Press Alt + R to read the document text or Alt + P to download or print.

No preview available

The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutReport 01r Jim Hanson Hanson Consulting 17446 Mallard Cove Lane Mt Vernon, WA 98274 tei: (360) 422-5056 eml: jchanson@verizon.net (applicant / contact) Mary Jo Carlson 215 NW 5th Street Renton, WA 98057 (party of record) Roland & Deloris Dewing 210 NW 5th Street Renton, WA 98057 (party of record) PARTIES OF RECORD TAYLOR LOT LINE ADJUSTMENT LUA08-016, LLA, ECF C Hanson LLC 17446 Mallard Cove Lane Mt Vernon, WA 98274 tel: (360) 422-5056 (owner) Roberta & Ronnie McDonald 216 NW 5th Street Renton, WA 98057 (party of record) Karen Walter Muckleshoot Indian Tribe Fisheries Dept. 39015 - 172nd Avenue SE Auburn, WA 98092 (party of record) Robert Rively 254 Seneca Avenue N* Renton, WA 9RO0 7 tei. (42�)'.�� (party of record) Bruce & Sue Gregg 207 NW 5th Street Renton, WA 98057 (party of record) Updated: 04/01/08 (Page 1 of ; CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON I APPROVAL DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT AND ENIPRONMENTAL SERVICES LOT LINE ADJUSTMENT APPROVED THIS ---- DAY OF 20-- DECLARATION KNOW ALL MEN BY TIrESE PRESENT ENAT NE rNE VNDERSx,'" OWNER(5) Or 7WIE LANK HERIE'TN OESCRiLID Do HEREBY MAKE A BOUNDARY LJN£ ADA6rAFEWE THEROF PURSLIWT M RCW 58. I7. 040 AND DECL4RE FHIS AOIU57WENT TO BE THE GRWHIC REPRESENTA770W Or THE suL-, AND rmr SAD AOJLISFMENT 6 U4DE W7M THE FREE CONSEW AND IN ACCORDOXF WITH rHE DESIRES OF THE OWNERS% eN WrrWSE WHEREOF WE HAVE SET OUR HANDS AND SE445 JJM Ri SDN, PARTNER W C 'MSOV LLG PROPERTY OWNtx STATE 0` WASWIAi ON lXVlN7Y O� ! cERIRY 7HAr r KNow 0R H A mzwAOrORr rokpEpxr TNSr JAY hAlm F SLONEO THIS A'SIRL%CNr MID ACXrpWi EDIGM 17 M BE HU TREE AND EWUNTW ACF FOR 71 USES AND PUAP73L$ NENWNEO rN THE "6rR17NENr. 6 w NOTARY PMX IN AND FOR ME SFAIE w ItlLVQOPrD IIY OOAprrssAJrF f puy$' srATE OF WASH TON COUNTY vc— ; CERREY 7FLAr r KNOW OR FIAYF SAMWADroNY EWXWf TWI _vOwD nws mcm%nyr AND Acmoftmav Ir TO BE (wx/1IEP) FRCF AND Y XUVTARr ACT PCP WE U= ANO PVR OMS MEW01N O M THE AcrRvdENr. 04TED Nt _y 'L IN AND FOP THE sTA7r p' WAS/,wiGrpy MY comossm EaNrREF RECOR.IUING CERTIFICATE f1EEV TOP RECORO 7W5 __— DAY OF ZOO , AT —__M. W BOOK _ Cf SUY4FrS AT PAGE — A r T REPf1EST OF —- __—. W N.M.FpY_ SZIPr. DF RfCO4Ds CITY OF RENTON LAND RECORD NUMBER LND- -` OIR>-GTOR DF PLANNING/BUILWNCFPUEILIC WORKS APPROVAL NOTES: RECORDING NO. VOL/PAGE THIS REQUEST QUALIFIES FOR ExEMPTION UNDER KCC 19A.28. IT DOES NOT GUARANTEE THAT THE LOTS WILL BE SUITABLE FOR DEVELOPMENT NOW OR IN THE FUTURE. THE LEGAL TRANSFER OF THE PROPERTY MUST BE DONE BY SEPARATE INSTRUMENT UNLESS ALL LOTS HEREIN ARE UNDER THE SAME OWNERSHIP. - KING COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF ASSESSMENTS PORTION OF EXAMINIFD k APPROVED THIS ___ DAY OF `__..._ 20w ljl mvc couN r ti$SEsQDSPLir RNp C6CNir ASSES R SR FE1/4, �w 1/4, SEC. _ 7_ 71YP 2-3 N., R 5_E., W.M. CITY OF RENTON FILE NUMBER LUA— ORIGINAL LEGAL DESCRIPTION' PAR= A' LnlaRx W A A00>r Lrd APpAOY nccvrpq fi TrIF rtA r IxR£if wEraSLYn w iALiPT n�in� or 9I• M T Tr//rL rgCM rNr a r[SI[rt[♦ maEr rx Wfor rP A ream rm.m wsuNr p[.wwN n.wc rrAr murrf+rrr PARCEL ARE„ AS RaAUAer ,r�a�1 TRax r7e .esr uvLrRrWr aawWR 7rR>Ra. AAARL a 6XT5TTNC RCYTSSD LO7r51 R AOpY A R �r ytp App�Av�l np'.plp/x ro nC R+r n,VErr YLYi'�'n w Al nx A'w rA, 94 w—Po '. nu WW1 PARG£L A: tE8i3 sF EWIAr iIF LWYIF]Pt r I lFF7 ]xElrrs'. Lor r: CJJ7l SF RlA1 PVrrKW' P' [OT 3 A[PIX A InWr Typ ADP�A a W(.- rp —PLAT 1r� PARCEL ID: li.@]St gr- A IK RIWMVx � KM(b'ir CA9rLlyv a'S�AU�or ;M O�Yr Clrf M AESh][v MAPS! Qr dnA7 tar. N A!Lr MwrNLM.r nxan M w01r ApVlrlA. NA- cY PARCEL L': sceee $i Lora r�znzS sr sAu 4PT CMrCIL SLOPr AREAS: F&)0 sF BASIS OF REARINGS M71 aP 11fE 945r5 or mcmwA'5 FLF 7N5 wAP rs RrymN I7Ar MO 'ovN IJSf SF MONAwEofty PI R r CENTERL4w OF NW 5w s7ftrr,, ar4Rwh - roM . 224 ± SF N7CId0RT PER PLAT OF WOXv GLEN A0017rOh: 47197-92 AS SHOWN. FAIL pry NEW EOT �1 CROSS REFERENCE: REr'EREACE S ALADE ro Re moW+we su^!F 3 fCR SCCTKXI 5lJBLNYISXFN ANO RE fiww Nr7Dn:' PLAT OF WgNY DEEM ADP'rrm IMLAWE 47. NOES 9J-92 PE4YwD Pr SIN ROM lmd PACE 104 REmm's OF JONC c"Tr *n "rcw LOr ADDRESSES: Lor I: ftPLACE AW REwJFTOI4L iVSNUNGrOA' AB/7SS Lor z' rAK OR AdM NW RENrav, AASANG7% 9COM VICINITY MAP f N7$ NOTES: -_ rXID AAfA.SLTREYENn r IMs 5� PFRFORNED WPH A 2' TOPCON MT& SrAT9X UgAW I m41•ERse gawaas nH r WET OR F7 aM Ar4VW'r REOLWCWNM CONr. WO W = 00.0S0 THE BDi My A ANO LAED pFS Ofti oVf r,.r5 00 ARF PER RT FO DTLE .. OW PAN r11DN AND REF'r rs GEED !AYES OBEY. 77r£Y BY NOT COURT ONr rd SNOw - OW1yERSMp EAYfs /NAr AWv OTMFrR115F BE AETfRAt/x£D BY A DOE/RT CE LAW 1I& 7D-QG PW AWGa'rY WN Pg JAFRETW WAS JYrgMX0 RY DnYERS ANO IS lmr ADED , .. . ONEY FOR O RFOLWIX M FOW Mr PCXKVBYS Or LOr L.TNr ACIIJS]MENr AND r4 dy WMOM FOR rWWEMM DF�" AD 77&N SI?P,f�ANY Of REOUIRFO FOR '.. ETYPNEERPC AND PL1WW PLYrP'asis ro MEET Rrou7RE0 OFSIGW 5rANLY4ROS FAR OR*%4w, Vrurks. D mw mo DAn* 7N0 SVR/R Ww5 PREPARED F W TIE EXnUSW USE OF THE CLENT A"ED fEREW rO BE USED ONLY FOR PC PURPOSE FON *Ncm fr WAS pQI WUAY W Zj,0L r. 1TS USE DOES NO7 EYrCm 70, AND Is Ntlr AuMMim FOR OSE VY AAR' WNAUED PERS OR FE'RS W. TMS _ F= -y S!/R42Y fS NqT TPANV MrAE TD A OT TR PARrr' W7r/q rH FXPRr P[N4WS AyD PFCERlfF] 7m RY ?w surwE W 10 A40rNER PAPTY '; ., COPrRX*6 Fr OR,M,ES r 4MC = U O PjRWydC EXCEPTIONS FROM TIME REPORT: LAND SURVEYOR'S CERTIFICATE THfS BOVNOARY LINE ADJUSTMENT CORRECTLY REPRESENTS A SURVEY MADE BY ME OR UNDR V7' IN CONFORMANCE WITH STATE AND COUNTY j� /�riaV4-c. f CRONES & ASSOC. — N LOT UNE ADJUSTMENT DIRECTION PR ,f1i l° Y A LAND SURVEYORS y pN,,. DT BAN GRD JANUARY, 200H No xAxgp-611-tAlElrwxARY Rl lto ................................. ............. s.TpuS iA>lli ACE sE rFNr, % stlCW (+Rl11A_ cRKc. By FIELn CRA DOD _ SHEET 1 GF 2 CERTIFICATE NO ..�95?�,,,,,, DATE DEVELOPMENT PLANNING CITY OF MENTON FEB 2 2 2008 RECEIVED CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON BOUNDARY LINE ADJUSTMENT NO. L A- - LNR f -� " 1 NygJ255 P)�N) FOUND loNLm 7F f \\ N7g=� MONUAIENr ti prKs) � 725 n�() a/a-) I` l �� 5Ttr STREET_ r �RM, � '91,ocx ApDrTrar -wOOgU E 47, PAGES 91_92 47 77 2e_ JM` S LQ. yy ` 29 d3Jh r � FOUcow-AVE 1 amAlEN7 R£N7DN fIONUMEM1•T /faD9 1 �.x \ N: bai9J.d49 �� \�-IT t, 'lam' PouNv MPNAfEw owr NF IN � � CA5'E WIrH K1N. \\ \\\\� ' �✓ ` •� [% \^n FOfJNO COFCRE'/F MONIINENI `_ F x0 9C.Ud AY ,:4w Mlrh Rma DETAIL OF RexrJw raw MExr /7e26 lul21O] , \ �N: F ]s53f26w CITY TIES THAT PORTION OF THE _SE 1/4, —�iw_1/4, SECTION _ 7 _ yOWNSHIP _23_ NORTH, RANGE __.EAST, W..m 2]Al0 1coYN ��. SE KF r, W om�1 r.:sJ FAY VOLJPAGE J v } GRAPHIC SCALE m ( IN FEET ) i inch - as rt. LEGEND: Jr FMND +ramLalEnr, As snowly • SEr RFB AMO G ZS 12327 'J FOVND RE6M, AS MOWN ® � S WMY SENCR &AWN LE PpWEq PocE ® WArFR M17E,R b WAFER VALIT P OwBox " AVPfT O WAY (N) 1NG'LHFEs Y VE NELD ITA4 rms SVRYFY (9) INVC = AIFAS[IAGD WMUF (P) IALiG1775 RECONP PER PLAT OF WOODY AER AE]Ixr (R) ma-WE5 REbRD PFR R '801104 LOT LINE ADR-MMENT Dw BY: 04TE JDEt V GRO JANUAkT. L906 HNi5�61r-0IaLIM,N'f aJ2) CHKO. BY; SCALE'. AiEET: GRA 2 or 2 DEVELOPMENT PLANNING CITY OF RENTON FEB 2 2 2008 RECEIVED bz \ 7C� v.\ V g 11 y �07•f 4 1 - 5 ,� A� - - TA>'LOR AVENUE NA mh �. �� Ap� g5-yqv§'•§�q"'qy M'-��§:-gg66c 6ggoe aq �I Il u -y lit o.<. By SI rf n AVMRA81Na 4 CNHANGCMENT PLAN Altme,m Oliver As LL47 MA — 5171! f LAN MrAG75 < MI TIOATION = TAYLOR PLA ! MA RENTON, WASRNQTON "" DEVELOPMENT PLANNlI+tG CITY OF RENTON FEB 2 2 2008 RECEIVED PIT 11111m g� f r� r M & n � A I p � U i i sY a- "u ej BUTTER AVERASINO t CNHANGBMENT PLAN PLANTING PLAN, PLANT SC+M ULsr, PL-rAIL5 t NOTES TAYL.OR PLAGG NW ICENTON, WA5HINOTON 4ltrnann Oliver Associates, LLC AQA — � " — DEV ELOPMeNT PLANNING CITY OF PfiENTON FEB 2 2 2008 RECEIVED s P v mull l �� s"T g A Hii " i v6iiij g Ya '�' ' g " `sg t ,� � Eij$ HIP I�e alit£^j aR� s a v�§£ �� s a £� s eI 65 $.=g= • aq a 4�- sg� � 5�- s• � � l,�,i,z $� g �ic'd' Sgs.�RRgFg� a e@� i'l Y p�gFg I- $" $j a" xd gY g q$r ll A ; 0 R1 lg j �.�� o �� , , I fl asP$$o 5 6 $ 3 P A gx[ �� xR 9� sg7�s �ji ypp;RR PRi�gR °g� ��R 11 1,a yy=s.a Rs9�R[k$k$511�°9 i y' SOgggg ��7 S d��a � d'R' ° 6a � gs fl qp A � a e �� €,�-� a P~ g €`fl Rr a �Y gig5� 4 4�f4s gg �$� ~ ,g� .� � �� $��A� u3�Y a 8 fl L Y jig, 11 �gs �lgB �Sl$�s.�EP�dj£$•jdR= !Y�d� g§ �Aad. g�foA,9 �o� x1g4�•'A 11 1 saNMI $ qA 'g I !Ill 6 i 1s1J € qA 4 og 11 iy Ilk omq $ 1a$ gR Ill NZIN_ q§ a'o11 831 � �ss� � '� �� o °��£ Y ��. �� s NNix •i 5 4�3d �:� 3$�e � � � ��$ �g g�� !� g�� J,5 q�s PAg$gg E#� gi§��o Yis dIT illg ° g $I 'ka �9 3 d2 a R s q Se y gg� 3 s S 5 �V 5 iigfi 77 -� q ilk g £ i lip N e � a� S P ` It _ ELPF:R AVERA&IN6 3 LNHANGiMENT PLAN GONSTRUkGTION $PEGIPIGATION5 TA,rLOR PLACE NW R&NTON, WASHINOTON Altmann ()liver Associates, LLC AOA _ YNn DEVELOPMENT PLANNNG CITY OF RENTON FEB 2 2 2008 RECEIVED Denis Law Mayor000000ar City of �y r� �. Community & Economic Development Department C.E."Chip"Vincent, Administrator January 5, 2015 Jim Hanson Hanson Consulting 17446 Mallard Cove Lane Mt. Vernon, WA 98274 Subject: Receipt of Fifth and Final Annual Maintenance and Monitoring Report Taylor LLA City of Renton File No. LUAOS-016 Dear Mr, Hanson: This letter is to inform you that I have accepted the fifth and final annual maintenance and monitoring report for the Taylor LLA mitigation project. Upon evaluation, it appears the project is in compliance with the established performance standards thereby satisfying the 5 year successful monitoring period requirement. I have initiated the paperwork to release the surety, in the amount of $5,462.50. If you have any general questions please contact me at (425) 430-721.9 or Stacy Tucker with questions in regards to the release of your surety at (425) 430-7282. Sincerely, wGf7:�%vFrest+ Rocale Timmons, Planner Current Planning Division cc: City of Renton File LUA 08-016 John Altmann - Altmann Oliver Associates, LLC Renton City Hall • 1055 South Grady Way . Renton, Washington 98057 • rentonwa.gov .......... DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY AND ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT M E M O R A N D U M DATE: January 5, 2015 TO: Stacy Tucker FROM: Rocale Timmons SUBJECT: Release of Assignment of Funds Taylor LLA Mitigation City of Renton File LUA08-016 Stacy, Please initiate the paperwork to release, the assignment of funds for the Taylor LLA mitigation project. The amount is for approximately $5,462.50. A copy of the paperwork should also go in the yellow file and to the City Clerk's office. Thank you! h.\red\planning\current planning\wetlands\taylor lla\release memo.dou Oct 13 10 09:32a jim hanson 3604228170 p.6 11 Business Flank Business I Persona] I Professional ASSIGNED SAVINGS ACCOUNT INFORMATION Business Name: C. ) �— Account Number: oacw 7 Amount of Account Being Held: 7Z/0 . so Name of Bank:j;j51rs.5 Bank Mailing Address: 6L)'-(L L\ �� _ 2 3 3 Depositor: (Print name) <::�i -Adstoli Signature of Depositor: 'V& 0 Tf>' Y1.0 J- PL ACCEPTANCE Date: O Said funds will be distributed only after u�S�_ 6�EsS � 0 k- has satisfied itseff that the work to be paid for has actually been performed to the satisfaction of the City of Renton. These funds set aside shall not be disbursed to the borrower, a contractor working for the borrower or any third party without the prior written approval of the City of Renton and this account shall not be terminated or all funds thereunder distributed without the prior approval of the City of Renton. In the event ef - =6� &J�QA) LL G fails to complete and pay for the improvements as required by the City of Renton, all funds remaining in said deposit shall be made available to the City of Renton to complete and pay for the cost of said improvements. Signature of Bank Officer:CL' -Of E'i itOl-1 Date: Bank Phone Number: Bank Officer: (Print name RC �I Titlei� _ �-��(f I"� j r Phone (360) 707-ZZ72 fcix (360) 707-2375 1 1854 South Burlington Boulevard I Burlington, WA 9SZ33 I %Yww.8usine8$SankWA-cont Oct 13 10 09:32a jim hanson 3604228170 p.7 11 Business Sank Business; Personal 1 Professional ASSIGNED SAVINGS ACCOUNT INFORMATION Business Name: C -"-) C Account Number: �jpO�Ci��o� _ G � Amount of Account Being Held: ? �` Name of Bank: t )cc5"'VASS x� Bank Mailing Address: :,gsy -5, 5U,I, Depositor: (Print name) Signature of Depositor: f u 7FE IT C 4T-YO &J ACCEPTANCE Date: /O —12 --J C; moiu/1al2rA/a Said funds will be distributed only after has satisfied itself that the work to be paid for has actually been performed to the satisfaction of the City of Renton. These funds set aside shall not be disbursed to the borrower, a contractor working for the borrower or any third party without the prior written approval of the City of Renton and this account shall not be terminated or all funds thereunder distributed without the prior approval of the City of Renton. In the event C_- 17 A•c sr "-' 'L (' C _ _ fails to complete and pay for the improvements as required by the City of Renton, all funds remaining in said deposit shall be made available to the City of Renton to complete and pay for the cost of said improvements. Signature of Bank Officer: Date: Bank Phone Number: 3 (c C) - -7 0-7 - ZZ 7Z Bank Officer: (Print name)D rC y � Title_l�l phonC (360) 707-2272 fax (360) 707-2375 1 1854 South Burlington Boulevard I Burlington, WA 138233 1 www.1Gus1nmI3ankWA_com Oct 13 10 09:30a jim Manson 3604228170 p.2 HANSON CONSULTING Jun Hanson 360-422-5056 October 9. 20 10 Rocale Timmons City of Renton 105 5 South Grady Way Renton WA 98057 Subject: Taylor LLA monitoring Dear Rocale: Thank you for reminding me of the monitoring requirements. Attached is: A revised contract with AOA for the monitoring. A proposal. from C. Hanson LLC for maintenance based on the bid from Picturesque Landscaping. (we will do it ourselves) ■ A set -aside from the bank for 1.25% of the monitoring cast and a set -aside for 1.25% of the maintenance cost. AOA will submit the monitoring report within the next few weeks. Please contact me if you have any questions. Th You: J' Hanson City, of Renton '�i�nn+n� I)iv+sicn Asir, 1 9 01 ir7��,��l�t► V 1Q) C Ranson LLC, 1.7446 Mallard Cove Lane, Mt Vernon WA 98274, JcBanson @ wavecable.com, 360422-5056 Oct 13 1 C 0931 a jim hanson 3604228170 p.5 C. HANSON LLC Jim Hanson 360-422-5056 October 9, 2010 Rocale Timmons City, of Renton 1055 South Grady Way Renton WA 98057 Subject: Taylor buffer landscaping maintenance Dear Rocale: C. Hanson LLC will be doing the maintenance work ourselves. We have based our estimate of costs on our bid from Picturesque Landscaping. The cost of the plant material was $1,700.00. The anticipated loss was %10 ($170.00). The yearly maintenance is S400.00. for a total of $570.00. We will submit a set -aside letter from the bank for 125% of the costs or $712.50. Thank You: un Hanson City of Renton t;lir! 1 '1. �Uli lfl Ell � � E,� � 1��' LU C Hanson LLC, 17446 Mallard Cove Lane, Mt Vernon WA 98274, JCHanson @ wavecable.com, 360-422-5056 Oct 13 10 09:31a jim hanson 3604228170 p.3 f) Altmann Oliver Associates, LLC AUA PO Pm)x _ 7.1; Uar'll:llicilk.IVA9,tipl-1 October 8, 2010 Officr {42-) -',!;_.43_5 i:.,\ {a'L'f1 :PT: 4-5)1K.i (;i-V,dot Rentovl Jim Hanson �'t ��l�l 1'I L 17446 Mallard Cove Lane U� !may r Mt. Vernon, WA 98274 Reference: 460 Taylor Place NW, Parcel #9564800136 Subject: Monitoring Contract Dear Jinn, EnviI-oninental Planning & L?ndscape A.1-chiteccure AOA 3257 Altmann Or'rver Associates, IlC (AOA) has prepared the following scope of services and cost estimate for five years of performance monitoring associated with the mitigation work completed on the Taylor Place project in Renton, WA. Construction of the project was approved by us on February 23. 2010- This proposal covers the required 5-year monitoring costs and does not include maintenance that I understand will be completed on a regular basis by a landscape contractor per the approved maintenance specifications detailed in our report and drawings. SCOPE OF SERVICES TaA l_ loMg&m A4oWtonng- $500for Qrrarter372-4 $5001 mar #mreafter Monitoring will be conducted for a,period of five growing season_ Monitoring will be completed now (as quarter 2), in late November (as quarter 3) and in February 2011 (as quarter 4, Year 1), then annually in February for Years 2-5. Monitoring will include an assessment of vegetation survival and weed control, " - Maintenance issues will be identified during the monitoring events and summarized in the report. This task includes .a plant mortality assessment at the end of Year 1 to determine the quantity of plants that died and may need to be replaced per the 100610 survival' requirement at Year I - Monitoring will include reports that urill be submitted to the City and you on a quarterly basis for the remaining portion of Year 1 and on an annual basis thereafter. Reports will include: photo documentation, treasures of success of the vegetation, maintenance recommendations, and an assessment of the success of the enhancement project overall. Oct 13 10 09,31a jim hanson 3604228170 p.4 Jim Hanson October 8, 2010 Page 2 of 2 TaskJ� Final Approval - $300 Escort City staff on a site review for final approval of the mitigation work (if deemed successful by the City at the end of the five year monitoring term)- This task includes correspondence with the City regarding sign -off and preparation of the final pertinent information relating to maintenance.. COST ESTIMATE Estimated costs to perform Tasks 1-2 are $3800. All work will be performed on the basis of tirne and materials according to our Standard Charges far professional Services (attached). If the scope of services and cast estimate are acceptable to you, please sign and return a copy of this letter as your authorization for us to proceed. We can have the 2� quarterly report to the City by the end of next week (October 151h)_ Thank you for the opportunity to continue work on this project_ We look forward to monitoring its success. If you have any questions, I can be reached via email at simore aelto';iver.comn or by phone at 425.333.4535- Sincerely. ALTMANN OLIVER ASSOCIATES, LLC Simone Oliver Project Manager Date Altmann Oliver Associates, LLC AOA POI�n\ >T8 (,alnafiInt.I1.11i'_�f;II OIfiI,�I1"-), 1-,,,-, I-.n I_',1-;';-1,f111 November 10, 2014 Rocale Timmons City of Renton Dept. of Community and 1055 South Grady Way Renton, WA 98057 Economic Development Reference: 460 Taylor Place NW, Parcel #956480-0136 Subject: Year 5 (4th Annual) Final Monitoring Report Dear Rocale: F]IN i1'()»11]('11f-111 I)li11111111ti [- I.ands('apc A ciiItccturc• AOA 3257 The buffer enhancement area at the Taylor Place NW site was installed in February of 2010 per the approved Buffer Averaging & Enhancement Plan dated February 7, 2008. The city -approved monitoring start date for the project is February 23, 2010, On October 21, 2014 we conducted a performance monitoring review of the mitigation area following the fifth growing season after installation. PERFORMANCE STANDARDS & CURRENT STATUS During our site review, we determined that the site continues to function well. Per the approved Stream Study, the performance standards for this project are as follows. Performance Standards for Objective A: Following every monitoring event for a period of at least five years, the enhancement area will contain at least 6 native plant species. In addition, there will be 100 % survival of all woody planted species throughout the enhancement area at the end of the first year of planting. Following Year 1, success will be based on an 80% survival rate or areal cover of planted or recolonized native species of 15% at construction approval, 20% after Year 1, 30% after Year 2, 40% after Year 3, 50% after Year 4 and 65% after Year 5. At the time of the October 21, 2014 field review, plant survival was very high and well above the 80% required survival rate. Since areal coverage within the enhancement area was estimated at about 80% and the area contained at least 6 native woody species, the site has met all of the performance standards for Objective A. R. '.� Rocale Timmons November 10, 2014 Page 2 Performance Standard for Objective B: After construction and following every monitoring event for a period of at least five years, exotic and invasive plant species will be maintained at levels below 10% total cover in all planted areas. These species include, but are not limited to, Himalayan and evergreen blackberry, reed canarygrass, morning glory, Japanese knotweed, English ivy, thistle, and creeping nightshade. At the time of the October 21, 2014 field review, the planting area had been maintained and no invasive species were observed. The site has therefore met the performance standard for Objective B. PHOTOS FROM PHOTO -POINT LOCATIONS The attached as -built drawing (Figure 1) depicts the location of photo -points for utilization during the 5-year performance monitoring period. The below photos were taken during the Year 5 review from the established photo - points. Photo Point 1: View looking west Rocale Timmons November 10, 2014 Page 3 Photo -Point 2. View looking east MAINTENANCE & SUMMARY Maintenance on the site has removed all invasive species from within the planting area and maintenance should now only continue on an as needed basis. All performance standards have been met and the site is functioning as designed. This concludes the performance monitoring on the site and we hereby request final sign -off from the City. If you have any questions, I can be reached at joh.npaltoliver.com or 425.333,4535. Sincerely, ALTMANN OLIVER ASSOCIATES, DYV�_� John Altmann Ecologist Attachment: Figure 1 cc: via email: Jim Hanson PLAN LEGEND _ offA J/ PROPERTY L I Nt — q GENTERLINE OF EXI5TIN6 STREAM - — — OHWM OF STREAM \ \ 35' STREAM BUFFER \ •\ AVERAGED BUFFER \ Z J SPLIT -RAIL FENCE 4 NGPA 516N5 \ LAlkiM.. APPROXIMATE LOCATION OF PHOTO -POINTS \ \ \ le f a1 577;; 4EA l I MPAGT LEGEND BUFFER REDUCTION 606 5F M I TI GATI ON LEGEND + + + + + BUFFER REPLACEMENT -700 5F BUFFER ENHANCEMENT 10&5 5F r f'' AREA OF GLEMATIS REMOVAL 2,166 5F GRAPHIC 5GALE N (IN FEET) 0 10 20 30 40 60 5GALE: 1: 20 r r 23�07f 5F FAR6EL 'sA o `.o PR 144.22' - D-A MPAGT5 AND MITI CHAT I ON PLAN PLANT 5GHEDULE SYM50L 5GIENTIFIG NAME COMMON NAME SPAGIN6 QTY. 51ZE (MIND AGER MAGROPf YLLUM BIG LEAF MAPLE AS 5HOWN 1 2 SAL. 4p CORYLU5 GORNUTA WESTERN HAZELNUT AS SHOWN 2 2 &AL. rz� ■ PSEUDOTSU 5A MENZ I ES I ! D006LA5 FIR AS SHOWN 2 2 SAL, ~� SYMBOL SCIENTIFIC NAME GOMMON NAME 5PAGING QTY. 517...E (MIN) 77`-cj�' - HOLOO15CU5 P15COLOR OCEAN SPRAY 5' O.G. 3 1 6AL. 14�4.22' MAHONIA AQUIFOLIUM ORE60N GRAPE 3' O.G. 22 1 6AL. RIBE5 5AN6UINEUM RED CURRANT 5' O.G. 4 1 6AL. ROSA NUTKANA NOOTKA R05E 3' O.G. 22 1 GAL. F7777-- f ` GRDUNDGOVER SYMBOL SCIENTIFIC NAME COMMON NAME 5PAGIN6 QTY. 51ZE (MIN) PLANTING PLAN POLY5TIGHUM MUNITUM SWORD FERN 3' O.G. 26 1 6AL. LC.1-1/7� I--,' 17,2g2 -� 3 Altmann Oliver Associates, LLC AOA PO Bo,..i 8 (AnIaliorl, WA 1)801 4 ()Ili(c ( 42.i) ,3A'�45Ii :S F;jx (42.51 TV1 4.)0,) November 23, 2013 ROcale Timmons City of Renton Dept. of Community and Economic Development 1055 South Grady Way Renton, WA 98057 Reference: 460 Taylor Place NW, Parcel #956480-0136 Subject: Year 4 (3rd Annual) Monitoring Report Dear Rocale: Environmental Manning & Landscape Ai-chiteclure The buffer enhancement area at the Taylor Place NW site was installed in February of 2010 per the approved Buffer Averaging & Enhancement Plan dated February 7, 2008. The city -approved monitoring start date for the project is February 23, 2010. On October 22, 2013 we conducted a performance monitoring review of the mitigation area following the fourth growing season after installation. PERFORMANCE STANDARDS & CURRENT STATUS During our site review, we determined that overall the site continues to function well. Per the approved Stream Study, the performance standards for this project are as follows. Performance Standards for Objective A: Following every monitoring event for a period of at least five years, the enhancement area will contain at least 6 native plant species. In addition, there will be 100 % survival of all woody planted species throughout the enhancement area at the end of the first year of planting. Following Year 1, success will be based on an 80% survival rate or areal cover of planted or recolonized native species of 15% at construction approval, 20% after Year 1, 30% after Year 2, 40% after Year 3, 50% after Year 4 and 60% after Year 5. At the time of the October 22, 2013 field review, plant survival was very high and well above the 80% required survival rate. Since areal coverage within the enhancement area was estimated at about 65% and the area contained at least 6 native woody species, the site is currently meeting all of the performance standards for Objective A. RE �.. Rocale Timmons November 23, 2013 Page 2 Performance Standard for Objective B: After construction and following every monitoring event for a period of at least five years, exotic and invasive plant species will be maintained at levels below 10 total cover in all planted areas. These species include, but are not limited to, Himalayan and evergreen blackberry, reed canarygrass, morning glory, Japanese knotweed, English ivy, thistle, and creeping nightshade. At the time of the October 22, 2013 field review the planting area had been maintained and no invasive species were observed. The site is therefore currently meeting the performance standard for Objective B. PHOTOS FROM PHOTO -POINT LOCATIONS The attached as -built drawing (Figure 1) depicts the location of photo -points for utilization during the 5-year performance monitoring period. The below photos were taken during the Year 4 review from the established photo - points. Photo -point 1. View looking west Photo -point 2. View looking east MAINTENANCE & SUMMARY Maintenance on the site has removed all invasive species from within the planting area and should continue on an on -going basis for the duration of the monitoring period. Both performance standards are currently being met and the site is functioning as designed. The next performance site review is scheduled for the fall of 2014. If the performance standards continue to be met, a finial summary report will then be submitted following the fall 2014 site review. Rocale Timmons November 23, 2013 Page 3 We look forward to monitoring this project's continued success. If you have any questions, I can be reached at john(@altoliver.com or 425.333.4535_ Sincerely, ALTMANN OLIVER ASSOCIATES, LLC John Altmann Ecologist Attachment: Figure 1 cc: via email: Jim Hanson rs PLAN LEGEND _ ,.Y„A F —— — PROPERTY LINES ._ o >0000 a N GENTERLINE OF EXI5TIN6 5TRF-AM — — — — — — — OHNM OF 5TREAM 35' 5TREAM BlFFER AVERAGED EkA9-':E-R \ \ 5PL I T-RAIL FENGE t NOPA 516N5 1 I y 1 pp-# APPROXIMATE LOGATION OF PHOTO -POINTS MPACT LEGEND 8U=F:FR REDUGTION 6O8 SF MIT16ATION LE6END + + + + + Buff=ER REPLACEMENT 100 5F I BUFFER ENHANGEMENT 10&5 5F AREA OF GLEMATI5 REMOVAL 2,06 SF 6RAPHIG SC ALE N (IN FEET) 0 10 20 30 40 60 5GAL.E: 1:20 /1 /GONE."= 1 ? FARGEL' IMPACTS ,AND MITI 6ATI DN PLAN 7 PLANT SCHEDULE O 'fir `� 16 � � � ~ /// z 11 Z Q -t�b °1924-17�— — — SYMBOL 50IE~NTIFIC NAME GOMMON NAME 5PACIN6 OTY. SIZE (MIN3 AGE=R MAGROPHYLLUM DO LEAF MAPLE A5 5HONN 1 2 &AL. GORYLU5 CA:) N A NE5TERN HAZELNUT A5 5H0NN 2 2 GAL. ■ P5E VOT5U6A MENZIE511 DOU6LAS FIR A5 5HOVN 2 2 GAL. di �� f■ ■ SHRUBS y �r '� r ■ 5YM130L 5G I FNTI F I G NAME COMMON NAME SPAG I N6 O-T Y. 51 M (MIN j HOLOD15GU5 D15COLOR OGF-AN SPRAY 5' O.G. 3 1 GAL. �144.}22, Q U M k NIA A )IFOLIUM OREOON GRAPE 3' O.G. 22 1 6AL. RIBF'5 SAN6,91NE UM READ CURRANT 5' O.G. 4 1 6AL. ROSA NUTKANA NOOTKA ROSE 3' D.G. 22 1 6AL. F777- � � 6ROUNDCOVER PLANTI N6 PLAIN 5YM50L 561FNT1FIG NAME COMMON NAME 5PAGIN6 QTY. SIZE (MIN) POL.Y5TIGHUM MUNITUM SWORD FERN 3' O.G. 26 1 &AL. Altmann Oliver Associates, LLc I'min)IIIn('111A I'ii1imil1ti K 11i.�11 s I t'[I lint' October 27, 2012 AOA 3257 Rocale Timmons City of Renton Dept. of Community and Economic Development 1055 South Grady Way Renton, WA 98057 Reference: 460 Taylor Place NW, Parcel #956480-0136 Subject: Year 3 (2nd Annual) Monitoring Report Dear Rocale: The buffer enhancement area at the Taylor Place NW site was installed in February of 2010 per the approved Buffer Averaging & Enhancement Plan dated February 7, 2008. The city -approved monitoring start date for the project is February 23, 2010. On October 15, 2012, we conducted a performance monitoring review of the mitigation area following the third growing season after installation. PERFORMANCE STANDARDS & CURRENT STATUS During our site review, we determined that overall the site continues to function well. Per the approved Stream Study, the performance standards for this project are as follows. Performance Standards for Objective A. - Following every monitoring event for a period of at least five years, the enhancement araa wit! -rnntaO at !past 6 native nlant q.nerieS. lr? ad lition. there. will be 100% survival of all woody planted species throughout the enhancement area at the end of the first year of planting. Following Year 1, success will be based on an 80% survival rate or areal cover of planted or recolonized native species of 15% at construction approval, 20% after Year 1, 30% after Year 2, 40% after Year 3, 50% after Year 4 and 60 % after Year 5. At the time of the October 15, 2012 field review, plant survival was very high and well above the 80% required survival rate. Since areal coverage within the enhancement area was estimated at about 60% and the area contained at least 6 native woody species, the site is currently meeting all of the performance standards for Objective A. Rocale Timmons October 27, 2012 Page 2 Performance Standard for Objective B: After construction and following every monitoring event for a period of at least five years, exotic and invasive plant species will be maintained at levels below 10% total cover in all planted areas. These species include, but are not limited to, Himalayan and evergreen blackberry, reed canarygrass, morning glory, Japanese knotweed, English ivy, thistle, and creeping nightshade. At the time of the October 15, 2012 field review the planting area had been maintained and no invasive species were observed. The site is therefore currently meeting the performance standard for Objective B. PHOTOS FROM PHOTO -POINT LOCATIONS The attached as -built drawing (Figure 1) depicts the location of photo -points for utilization during the 5-year performance monitoring period. The below photos were taken during the Year 3 review from the established photo - points. Photo -point 1. View looking west law Photo -point 2. View looking east MAINTENANCE R SUMMARY Maintenance on the site has removed all invasive species from within the planting area and should continue on an on -going basis for the duration of the monitoring period. Both performance standards are currently being met and the site is functioning as designed. The next performance site review is scheduled for the fall of 2013. A summary report will then be submitted following the fall 2013 site review. Rocale Timmons October 27, 2012 Page 3 We look forward to monitoring this project's continued success. If you have any questions, I can be reached at iohnRaltoliver.com or 425.333.4535. Sincerely, ALTMANN OLIVER ASSOCIATES, LLC John Altmann Ecologist Attachment: Figure 1 cc: via email: Jim Hanson PLAN LEGEND � PROPERTY L I NL — 1 GENTERLINE OF EXI5TIN5 STREAM - - OHWM OF STREAM \ .... _...... - 35' STREAM Mr-FER AVERA5ED BUFFER \ 5PLIT-RAIL FENGE t NGPA 51ON5 sm APPROXIMATE LOCATION OF PHOTO -POINTS MPAGT LEGEND BUFFER REDUCTION 608 5F MIT OA71 ON LEGEND + + + + + 8 ,FCEI : P�'aLAG1=N`1=�:T -TOO 5F BUFFER EN14ANCEMENT 1085 SF AREA OF CLEMAT15 REMOVAL 2,186 5F &RAPH I G 5GALE N (IN FEET) O 10 20 30 40 60 5GALE: 1: 20 r �! py�I�-fiNAP. � PUNTING PLAN i PROF05ED `----- Ht� 1 MPAC,T5 AND M I T I GAT I ON PLAN 7 PLANT 5GHEDULE TREES SYMBOL V lttr w --o 5- GTWFAM 144 SCIENTIFIC NAME COMMON NAME 5PAGING OT'f. 5iZE (MIN) AGER MAGROPHYLLUM B16 LEAF MAPLE AS 5HOHN 1 2 SAL. - GORYLUS CORNUTA AESTERN HAZELNUT A5 SHOWN 2 2 GAL. - P5R DOT5U6A MENZIE511 DOU5LA5 FIR AS SHOWN 2 2 GAL. 5HRUB5 SYMBOL 5GIENTIFIG NAME COMMON NAME 5PAGING G2TY. 51ZE (MIN) HOLOD15GU5 D150OLOR OCEAN 5PRAY 5' D.G. 3 1 GAL. U MAHONIA AQUIFOLIUM ORE60N GRAPE 3' O.G. 22 1 EAL. RIBE5 5AN6UINEUM RED GURRANT 5' O.G. 4 1 6AL. ROSA NUTKANA NOOTKA R05E 310.6. 22 1 OAL. C ROUNDGOVER 5YMBOL 5GIENTIFIG NAME COMMON NAME 5PAGING QTY. 51,ZE (MIN) POLY5TIGHUM MUNITUM SWORD FERN 3' O.G. 26 1 GAL. Aug 09 11 08;23a r jim hanson 3604228170 p.7 December 30, 2010 Rocale Timmons City of Renton Dept of Community and Economic Development 1055 South Grady Way Renton, WA 98057 Reference: 460 Taylor Place NW, Parcel #9564800136 Subject: 3rd Quarterly Monitoring Report Dear Rocale: AOA AOA 3257 As you know, the buffer enhancement area at the Taylor Place NW site was installed in February of 2010 per the approved Buffer Averaging & Enhancement Plana dated February 7, 2008. The city -approved monitoring start date for the project is February 23, 2010. On December 16, 2010, we conducted the third quarterly monitoring review of the mitigation area. PERFORMANCE STANDARDS & CURRENT STATUS During our site review we determined that overall the site continues to function well. Per the approved Stream Study, the performance standards far this project are as follows. Performance Standards for Objective A: Following every monitoring event for a period of at least five years, the enhancement area will contain at least 6 native plant species. In addition, there will be 100'/ survival of all woody planted species throughout the enhancement area at the end of the first year of planting_ Following Year 1, success will be based on an Swo survival rate or areal cover of planted or recolonized native species of 15% at construction approval, 20'% after Year 1, 30% after Year 2, 40'16 after Year 3, 50% after Year 4 and 60% after Year 5. At the time of the December 16, 201 D field review, all of the plantings that had died had been replaced and there is currently 100% survival. As part of the re -planting effort, the Douglas fir was replaced, 22 black twinberry were substibAed for the 22 Oregon -grape that had died, 3 Nootka rose were substituted for the 3 ocean spray that had died, and 8 sword fern were replaced. Since areal coverage within the enhancement area was estimated at about 25%, and the enhancement area Aug 09 11 08:24a jim hanson 3604228170 p.8 Rocaie Timmons December 30, 2010 Page 2 contained greater than 6 native woody species, the site is currently meeting all of the performance standards for Objective A• Performance Standard for Objective B: After construction and following every monitoring event for a period of at least five years, exotic and invasive plant species will be maintained at levels below 10% total cover in all planted areas_ These species include, but are not limited to, Himalayan and evergreen blackberry, reed canarygrass, morning glory, Japanese knotweed, English ivy, thistle, and creeping nightshade. At the time of the December 16, 2010 field review, the planting area contained no invasive species and the site is currently meeting the performance standard for Objective B. PHOTO FROM PHOTO -POINT LOCATIONS The attached as -built drawing (Figure 1) depicts the location of photo -points for utilization during the 5-year performance monitoring period. Here are photos taken during the 3rd quarterly review from the established photo - points. r. -7P A t - Photo -point 1. View looking west Photo -point 2. View looking east MAINTENANCE & SUMMARY Maintenance on the site has removed all invasive species from within the planting area and should continue on an on -going basis for the duration of the monitoring period. Both performance standards are currently being met and the site is functioning as designed. The next site review (4th Quarter) is scheduled for February 2011, after which a summary report will be sent to you. Aug 09 11 08:24a jim hanson 3604228170 p.9 Rocale Timmons December 30, 2Q10 Page 3 We look forward to monitoring this project's continued success. If you have any questions, I can be reached at or 425.333.4535. Sincerely, ALTMANN OLIVER ASSOCIATES, LLC John Altmann Ecologist Attachment: Figure 1 cc: via email: Jim Hanson i� C V has PL,4N LEGEND PRAFWtTY LINE • • CENTERLINE OF exar1NG 57REAM "' 5MP M d.PPGR p7 � � �� •� Av�AeC� CLTTdi � ` � � f � � d n SP'LIr-RAIL PeHc.e c NSPA 51GN5 pp-0 APPROXIMATE LOGAT7oN Or PHoTO•PoINPS-5 T M _ f�01. r� f MPAGT LE6ENb s` r--f— 1MATtR Mmuc eoe sF _ FARGEL 1TI c5AT_I N LEGEND 77 .25 �'3�� ' 7 L O r .2 p <r- DER R&�Lr'4cmeff 'rw or ti pick l�G � ° r7 q t sF C� allFFtR W+i+WrLF IoM sr o t Q ARLA vP duns ruara�AL 2JBa sF 1 HiOP05EP "�y t� + + . ' . + « r + + 1 + + + HOUeff RAP PP-1 M d b HIG 5GAL5 ' (IN FMT) 9Add d;) .t: " 4i-�(37t 5F 26,11. 1 OS � ■ 0 1�� PLANTIN PLAN MPACT J7 4 �m �1 4Nti MITIGATION f?�AN A PLANT SCH5DULg TRM O �YTiEOL SLIMMFI1G NA1� GOh1•tM NAdE AGI CITY. 5iZE ZF11U A" R MA49 POYLLw BIB LeA-r MAPLE A3 5tom I 2 SAL. c LaRYiJ1S GORNUTA i-ftTE RN FLAZa.M/f AS 5"OM 2 2 OAL. t i _ P6WXX r"A HMESI1 OWSLA5 F!R M *ivm 2 2 BAL. HCLOC I5CM$ DIOWLOR OCF-M `FRAY 9' Or,. 5 1 ON- --- MA}IONIA A(7I1tFpI_W OPCWK ORAP@ .5104. 22 i BAL. {�}1- RIBM SNftlNMPH RED WMANF S' O.G. 4 1 &AL. — - R05A HU ANA NWYKA PAW 9' O.G. 22 1 eAL, SYMBOL SCIIEN71M NAI-e C42440H K4V 5PACN8 0M SIZE WO POL'f5T1L -um KNITLM %imp PM44 6' OIL, 26 1 eAL, Denis Law Cl Of Mayor �° "f ► Y r rt"'� r� January 20, 2015 Community & Economic Development Department C.E. "Chi p"Vincent, Administrator Darcy Owings Martin Vice President Regional Sakes Manager Business Bank 1854 South Burlington Blvd Burlington, WA 98233 SUBJECT: RELEASE OF WETLAND BUFFER MITIGATION SURETY DEVICE ASSIGNMENT OF FUNDS #1700000027 & #1700000225 TAYLOR LOT LINE ADJUSTMENT LUA08-016 Dear Ms. Owings Martin: This letter will serve as authority to release the Assignment of Funds #1700000027 and #1700000225 issued October 12, 2010, to C. Hanson LLC in the amounts of $712.50 and $4,750.00 respectively, posted to the City of Renton on behalf of the Taylor Lot Line Adjustment. Enclosed is the documentation for your reference. If you have any questions, please contact the Project Manager, Rocale Timmons at (425) 430-7219. Sincerely, Jennifer T. Henning Planning Director CC Rocale Timmons, Planning City of Renton File LUA08-016 Enclosure(s): Business Bank Assignment of Funds #1700000027 & #1700000225 Renton City Hall . 1055 South Grady Way . Renton, Washington 98057 - rentonwa.gov 4-. 36^ ^?281 70 p,6 Cot'13 10 09:32a jim hanson --jo Business Sank Business I Personal I Professional ASSIGNED SAVINGS ACCOUNT INFORMATION Business Name: C A in ) �-- Z '- Account Number: 170Qc20 0 97 Amount of Account Being Held: :7 l0 • S-c) Name of Bank:v��s.� Bank Mailing Address: 1.gf� �-i !-I,•?J 1 Depositor: (Print name) C, AT Lz D, (:�� Signature of Depositor. LDate:_ 0 :L-C � �'V& p TR Y40 F - �L ,3 i- FCC R la 1 r•T,l & R 7-7 D 7-e ,v A ACCEPTANCE Said funds will be distributed only after A/ Jr- has satisfied itself that the work to be paid for has actually been performed to the satisfaction of the City of Renton. These funds set aside shall not be disbursed to the borrower, a contractor working for the borrower or any third party withoutthe prior written approval of the City of Renton and this account shall not be terminated or all funds thereunder distributed without the prior approval of the City of Renton. In the event of &2 A) ZZ- C-- fails to complete and pay for the improvements as required by the City of Renton, all funds remaining in said deposit shall be made available to the City of Renton �ttoo complete and pay for the cost of said improvements. Sig r<ature of Bank OfFicer: CI ; L� CL ® neyito Date: �.-� Bank Phone Number: Bank Officer. -(Print name)" Title 1��1 �� `f�� 5 �� r Phone (360) 707-ZZ72 ftrc (360) 707-2373 1 1834 South Burlington Boulevard I Burlington, WIA 98Z33 , Nvww.I3usinessSankWA-6;om Oct� 13 10 09:32a jim hanson 3 228170 p 7 -771 Business Bank Business ; Personal i Professional ASSIGNED SAYINGS ACCOUNT INFORMATION Business Name: 14A41 0 A-� /- /— C - Account Number: _T Q0<!::)C--,42J2:5- Amount of Account Being Held: z-/ 7 -� Name of Bank: r �cc5� _ SS e� A Sank Mailing Address: or- 6 d, �-, L-A'* '� 9-L3 -�D> Depositor: (Print name)..�,c_s�.�; c' Signature of Depositor: 9U r-r E � Z- -A4 r T i & 4 r-Jo nu ACCEPTANCE Date. IQ -!:?-1C3 Said funds will be distributed only after ' cL sl.��ts5 v9A-' has satisfied itself that the work to be paid for has actually been performed to the satisfaction of the City of Renton. These funds set aside shall not be disbursed to the borrower, a contractor working for the borrower or any third party without the prior written approval of the City of Renton and this account shall not be terminated or all funds thereunder distributed without the prior approval of the City of Renton. In the everrt C . fails to complete and pay for the improvements as required by the City of Renton, all funds remaining in said deposit shall be made available to the City of Renton to complete and pay for the cost of said improvements. Sig natureof Bank officer: / � �'; _ Date: f 2-/01 Bank Phone Number: 3 Coed - -7 D-7 - ZZ 7Z Bank Officer: (Print name) 1, -err �tigs i'�C� ,, 41 Title V is Phone (3613) 707-ZZ72 fax (3601 707-2375 1 1954 Soutli Burlington Boulevard I Burlington, 1+1.'A 9SZ33 d www.BusinessBankWA.Com Denis Law CityO Mayor August 3, 2011 Department of Community and Economic Development Alex Pietsch, Administrator Jim Hanson Hanson Consulting 17446 Mallard Cove Lane Mt. Vernon, WA 98274 Subject: Request for More Information - First Annual Monitoring Report Taylor LLA Stream Buffer Mitigation Project City of Renton File LUA 08-016 Dear Mr. Hanson: This letter is to inform you that on March 2, 20111 received the last of your quarterly monitoring report for the Taylor LLA stream buffer mitigation project. You were informed on September 3, 2011 if the surety device is received prior to October 15, 2010, the start of your monitoring program will be backdated to February 23, 2010. Otherwise, your monitoring program will begin on the date of receipt for the surety device. We have yet to receive two executed contracts (attached) along with a surety device for the following amount: Monitoring $6,800 Plant Replacement / Maintenance $1,750 TOTAL 1&550 @ 125 % $10,687.50 While you have begun the maintenance and monitoring without an official letter from the City we are willing to allow you to retain a start date of February 23, 2010 if you provide the information requested. Please provide the executed contracts and surety device prior to September 2 2011 in order to maintain your monitoring schedule. If you have any questions please feel free to contact me at (425) 430-7219. Sincerely, R ale Timmons, Planner Current Planning Division Cc: Simone Oliver, Altman Oliver Associates, LLC City of Renton File LUA08-016 Renton City Hall • 1055 South Grady way • Renton, Washington 98057 • rentonwa.gov Altmann Oliver Associates, LLC AOA I'f > 1, 7 � f-:1113,ifinn, WA 9811t I ( )I ficc ( 12.7p) 333-153®� i��:133-1 109 city Plan�rlin9 D tVtSt�� December 30, 2010 Rocale Timmons City of Renton Dept. of Community and 1055 South Grady Way Renton, WA 98057 Economic Development Reference: 460 Taylor Place NW, Parcel ##9564800136 Subject: 3rd Quarterly Monitoring Report Dear Rocale: I'.11x"11_011111ental Planning & Lanrlscapc Architecture AOA 3257 As you know, the buffer enhancement area at the Taylor Place NW site was installed in February of 2010 per the approved BufferAveraging & Enhancement Plan dated February 7, 2008. The city -approved monitoring start date for the project is February 23, 2010. On December 16, 2010, we conducted the third quarterly monitoring review of the mitigation area. PERFORMANCE STANDARDS & CURRENT STATUS During our site review we determined that overall the site continues to function well. Per the approved Stream Study, the performance standards for this project are as follows. Performance Standards for Objective A: Following every monitoring event for a period of at least five years, the enhancement area will contain at least 6 native plant species. In addition, there will be 100% survival of all woody planted species throughout the enhancement area at the end of the first year of planting. Following Year 1, success will be based on an 80% survival rate or areal cover of planted or recolonized native species of 15% at construction approval, 20% after Year 1, 30% after Year 2, 40% after Year 3, 50% after Year 4 and 60 % after Year 5. At the time of the December 16, 2010 field review, all of the plantings that had died had been replaced and there is currently 100% survival. As part of the re -planting effort, the Douglas fir was replaced, 22 black twinberry were substituted for the 22 Oregon -grape that had died, 3 Nootka rose were substituted for the 3 ocean spray that had died, and 8 sword fern were replaced. Since areal coverage within the enhancement area was estimated at about 25%, and the enhancement area r+. Rocale Timmons December 30, 2010 Page 2 contained greater than 6 native woody species, the site is currently meeting all of the performance standards for Objective A. Performance Standard for Objective B: After construction and following every monitoring event for a period of at least five years, exotic and invasive plant species will be maintained at levels below 10% total cover in all planted areas. These species include, but are not limited to, Himalayan and evergreen blackberry, reed canarygrass, morning glory, Japanese knotweed, English ivy, thistle, and creeping nightshade. At the time of the December 16, 2010 field review, the planting area contained no invasive species and the site is currently meeting the performance standard for Objective B. PHOTO FROM PHOTO -POINT LOCATIONS The attached as -built drawing (Figure 1) depicts the location of photo -points for utilization during the 5-year performance monitoring period. Here are photos taken during the 3rd quarterly review from the established photo - points. Photo -point 1. View looking west Photo -point 2. View looking east MAINTENANCE $ SUMMARY Maintenance on the site has removed all invasive species from within the planting area and should continue on an on -going basis for the duration of the monitoring period. Both performance standards are currently being met and the site is functioning as designed. The next site review (4th Quarter) is scheduled for February 2011, after which a summary report will be sent to you. Rocale Timmons December 30, 2010 Page 3 We look forward to monitoring this project's continued success. If you have any questions, I can be reached at iohnCa)_altoliver.com or 425.333.4535. Sincerely, ALTMANN OLIVER ASSOCIATES, LLC John Altmann Ecologist Attachment: Figure 1 cc: via email: Jim Hanson ` PLAN LEC7END - PROPERT' L. GENTERL I NE OF EX15TI N& STREAM �' \ _._ — — — — OHWM OF STREAM \ \ 35' STREAM SUFFER \ •\ AYERAE ED EUFFE-R \ \ SPLIT -RA! L FENCE 4 N&PA 516N5 Bm 1 I APPROXIMATE LOGATION OF PHOTO -POINTS I MP,4GT LEGEND I 1 ` �1Z \r BUFFER REDUCTION boa 5F 1, \ n MIT16ATION LEGEND + + + t + DER REPLAGEME'NT -too 5F BUFFER ENHANCEMENT 10b5 SF AREA OF GLEMATI5 REMOVAL 2,186 5F 6FIZAPH I G SCALE N (IN FEET) O 10 20 30 40 60 5GALE. 1: 20 PL4NT1 NC7 PLAN I MPAC-75 AND MITI &AT I ON PLAN ;T PLANT SCHEDULE TREES ' SYMBOL• \�o A .OF ri .,0 a ' 6; TP)=.a n�t SGIENTIFIG NAME GOMMON NAME 5PAGIN6 0-rY. 51ZE (MIND AGER MAGROPHYLLUM Bib LEAF MAPLE AS 5HOWN 1 2 GAL. - CORYLU5 GORNUTA k4E5TERN HAZELNUT A5 5HOWN 2 2 GAL. - P5EUDOT5UGA MENZIE-511 DOUGLA5 FIR A5 SHOWN 2 2 GAL. SHRUBS SYMBOL 5CIENTIFIG NAME COMMON NAME SPACING QTY. SIZE (MIN) HOLOO15CU5 D156OLOR OCEAN SPRAY 5' O.G. 3 1 6AL. MAHONIA AQUIFOLIUM OREGON &RAPE 3' O.G. 22 1 GAL. r� RI BE5 5AN6U I NEUM RFD GURRANT 5' O.G. 4 1 &AL. R05A NUTKANA NOOTKA R05E 3' O.G. 22 1 C6AL. GROUNV OVER SYMBOL 5GIENTIFIG NAME COMMON NAME 5PAGING QTY. 51ZE (MIN) POLY5TIGHUM MUNITUM 5W0RD FERN 3' O.G. 26 1 6AL. 0 Altmann Oliver Associates, LLC AOA N ) i;." _'7" {:,1lntunIll, 11 l'Itilll i February 28, 2011 Rocale Timmons [)]lil r 1 4";1I 11 I',IS I I'_' ,: �.,. I.0I'.I CitY Of Renton Planning Division MA1 - C £ul W �VED City of Renton Dept. of Community and Economic Development 1055 South Grady Way Renton, WA 98057 Reference: 460 Taylor Place NW, Parcel #9564800136 Subject: 4th Quarterly Monitoring Report Dear Rocale: F. I I virm IIIIc)I1A I.<<nriticapc� .1rr11i�crtlu�' AOA 3257 As you know, the buffer enhancement area at the Taylor Place NW site was installed in February of 2010 per the approved Buffer Averaging & Enhancement Plan dated February 7, 2008. The city -approved monitoring start date for the project is February 23, 2010. On February 7, 2011, we conducted the fourth quarterly monitoring review of the mitigation area. PERFORMANCE STANDARDS & CURRENT STATUS During our site review we determined that overall the site continues to function well. Per the approved Stream Study, the performance standards for this project are as follows. Performance Standards for Objective A: Following every monitoring event for a period of at least five years, the enhancement area will contain at least 6 native plant species. In addition, there will be 100% survival of all woody planted species throughout the enhancement area at the end of the first year of planting. Following Year 1, success will he based on an 80°% survival rate or areal cover of planted or recolonized native species of 15% at construction approval, 20% after Year 1, 30% after Year 2, 40% after Year 3, 50% after Year 4 and 60% after Year 5. At the time of the February 7, 2011 field review there was 100% survival of all planted material. Since areal coverage within the enhancement area was estimated at about 25% and the area contained greater than 6 native woody species, the site is currently meeting all of the performance standards for Objective A. Rocale Timmons February 28, 2011 Page 2 Performance Standard for Objective B: After construction and following every monitoring event for a period of at least five years, exotic and invasive plant species will be maintained at levels below 10% total cover in all planted areas. These species include, but are not limited to, Himalayan and evergreen blackberry, reed canarygrass, morning glory, Japanese knotweed, English ivy, thistle, and creeping nightshade. At the time of the February 7, 2011 field review, the planting area contained no invasive species and the site is currently meeting the performance standard for Objective B. PHOTO FROM PHOTO -POINT LOCATIONS The attached as -built drawing (Figure 1 ) depicts the location of photo -points for utilization during the 8-year performance monitoring period. Here are photos taken during the 4th quarterly review from the established photo - points. Photo -point 1. View looking west Photo -point 2. View looking east MAINTENANCE & SUMMARY Maintenance on the site has removed all invasive species from within the planting area and should continue on an on -going basis for the duration of the monitoring period. Both performance standards are currently being met and the site is functioning as designed. The next performance site review is scheduled for the spring of 2011. A summary report will then be submitted following the fall 2011 site review. Rocale Timmons February 28, 2411 Page 3 We look forward to monitoring this project's continued success. If you have any questions, I can be reached at john(@altoliver.com or 425.333.4535. Sincerely, ALTMANN OLIVER ASSOCIATES, LLC L ujl"-101� John Altmann Ecologist Attachment: Figure 1 cc: via email: Jim Hanson Easp-0T—ZZ—Za—T{gsa—d9ZS aasTn�x NOIGNIHGVM 'NOlN�N OI-ZZ-Zivov a�,=j ade�r rv�� aJva MN A9V—ld �O-LOV1 S1N:411'.+"WieiCi r-l.e-iiSo- ISLalamy VM oaxre of I szv�s N'd-id AN Wg'DNVHN3'4G=Hf1H AIng-5'd D77 `SOjl?l')OSSV IanTI() UUPL Tlid LSZ� OS NY-16 GNI1N'd7d 1-1102-GV '1# �JN091� 10RfO*da "We - \ I � r 9N/ 7 M3N 7'� �� Zla' I I / / .� 10 �I• + + — m N rt N Q + I_ Q a ry o¢o a � r ID / OL / ■ IQ r- o/ a } O ~ 7LU LU OL LLI J L_u-0"� UK- 0 4 Altmann Oliver Associates, LLC �AOA I'I ) I; ,, - A .111t.111,i1i %% % i�"„I I ( )!Ip � I I, . 1-. I.,% I" -. , 1-01,i GM OA p'tiv`sion oanni09 tiOV ' , 10 October 29, 2010 �r�' �� l�' � V 1� ;. Rocale Timmons City of Renton Dept. of Community and Economic Development 1055 South Grady Way Renton, WA 98057 Reference: 460 Taylor Place NW, Parcel #9564800136 Subject: 2^d Quarterly Monitoring Report Rocale, I'.IIx I I r I I I I I ICI I a l I.;tirl.r :yu� Alchily( [IIIc AOA 3257 The buffer enhancement area at the Taylor Place NW site was installed in February of this year per the approved BufferAveragrng & Enhancement Plan dated 2-7-2008. We submitted a certificate of installation to you on February 22nd that included the as -built plan. Since no prior monitoring was completed on this project, you submitted a letter to our client, Jim Hansen and a copy to us on September 13, 2010. In the letter you stated that the monitoring program had not begun since neither the monitoring nor maintenance contract had been signed and the surety device had not been posted. You also stated that if this was completed with receipts submitted to you by 10/15/2010, the monitoring start date would be back -dated to 2/23/2010. We understand from Mr. Hansen that the two signed contracts, along with the surety device were submitted to the City, therefore, the monitoring period began on 2/23/2010. On October 26t11, we completed the first monitoring review of the site, which would represent the 2^1 quarterly report, with the 3r,' due in late November of this year followed by the 4`1 / Year 1 report submitted by 2/23/2011. Since we are now under contract for completing this work, we will ensure it is done and submitted per this schedule here on out. PERFORMANCE STANDARDS & CURRENT STATUS During our site review, we determined that overall, the site is functioning well. Per the approved Stream Study prepared by us, dated 2/19/2008 the performance standards for this project are as follows. Rocale Timmons October 29, 2010 Page 2 of 3 Performance Standards for Objective A: Following every monitoring event for a period of at least five years the enhancement area will contain at least 6 native plant species. In addition, there will be 100% survival of all woody planted species throughout the enhancement area at the end of the first year of planting: Following Year 1, success will be based on an 80% survival rate or areal cover of planted or recolonized native species of 15% at construction approval, 201Y0 after Year 1, 30% after Year 2. 40% after Year 3. 50916 after Year 4 and 60% after Year 5. At the time of the 10/26/2010 field review, the enhancement area contained 6 native woody species, areal cover of woody species was approximately 18% and plant survival was at 62% due to mortality of all of the Oregon -grape and ocean spray, 1 Douglas fir and 8 sword fern. However, replanting occurred late this week. The Douglas fir was replaced, 22 black twinberry were substituted for the 22 Oregon -grape that had died, 3 Nootka rose was substituted for the 3 oceanspray that had died and 8 sword fern were replanted. Due to the plant replacements, the site is currently meeting all of the performance standards for Objective A. Performance Standard for Objective B: After construction and following every monitoring event for a period of at least five years exotic and invasive plant species will be maintained at levels below 101yo total cover in all planted areas These species include, but are not limited to, Himalayan and evergreen blackberry. reed canarygrass, morning glory, Japanese knotweed, English ivy, thistle, and creeping nightshade. At the time of the 10/26/2010 field review, the planting area contained no invasive species; therefore the site is currently meeting the performance standard for Objective B. PHOTO FROM PHOTO -POINT LOCATIONS The attached as -built drawing (Figure 1) depicts the installed location of plantings, and photo -points for utilization during the 5-year performance monitoring period. Here are photos taken during the 2"11 quarterly review from the established photo -points. Photo -point 1. View looking NW Photo -point 2. View looking NE Rocale Timmons October 29. 2010 Page 3 of 3 MAINTENANCE & SUMMARY Currently, no maintenance is necessary at the site. Both performance standards are currently being met. Our next site review (the 3^d Quarter) is scheduled for late November after which a summary report will be sent to you. We look forward to monitoring this projects continued success. If you have any questions, l can be reached at simone(Daltoliver.com or 425.333.4535. Sincerely, ALTMANN OLIVER ASSOCIATES. LLC Simone Oliver Landscape Architect Attachment: Figure 1 — As -built Planting Plan cc: via email: Jim Hanson PLAN LEGEND PROPERTY LINE CENTERLINI= OF EXI5TIN6 STREAM - — — ___ _._ - OHW OF STREAM ®� 35' 5TREAM BUFFER AVERA6ED DUPPER 5PL I T-RAIL FENCE 3 N6PA 516N5 * PP-# APPROXIMATE LOGATION OF PHOTO-POINT5 MPACT LEGEND MITISATION LEGEND + + + + + BUFFM REFI-AC.EMENT 'TOO 5F IIIIIIIIIII/11 = ---- - GR,4PH I G SGALE N (IN FEET) O 10 20 50 40 60 5GAL_E.1. 20 IMP y VV i F Q -5- z 13,2q2+ �F-- � Q ICE t t I \ f 7-7,-e2fj 1 o 144.22` ♦ 1 MIT16ATION PLAN PLANT SCHEDULE -110 5GIENTIFIG NAME COMMON NAME 5PAGIN6 QTY. SIZE tMIN) \� AGER MAGROPHYLLUM 1516 LEAF MAPLE A5 51 b1Nrl 1 2 GAL. GORYLU5 GORNUTA HE5TERN HAZELNUT A5 5HOHN 2 2 GAL. P5EiVOT5U6A MENZ11=51I DOU6LA5 FIR A5 5HOM 2 2 GAL. • ■ �` 5HRUE35 5YMBOL 5GIENTIFIG NAME COMMON NAME 5PAGIN6 QTY. SIZE (MIN) HOLO015GU5 D15C40LOR OCEAN SPRAY 5' D.G. 3 1 GAL. — 144.+2�2 r MAHONIA AQUIFOLIUM ORE60N GRAPE 3' O.C. 22 1 GAL. RIBE5 5AN6UINEUM RED CURRANT 5' O.G. 4 1 6AL. F17777P m - ROSA NUTKANA NOOTKA ROSE 3' O.G. 22 1 6AL. 6ROUNDGOVER 5YMBOL 5GIENTIFIC NAME C47MMON NAME 5PA(-IN6 QTY. 51ZE MIN) PLANTING PLAN POLY5TIGHUM MUNITUM 5HORD FERN 31 O.G. 26 1 GAL. LW AOAAltmann Oliver Associates, LLc .tII 11. 111��ii1 1 f Ii1'i� �_' i''1.; 1- F. klA I_'� i-('�I Y!� I'.11V'€I'1111 III c II1A �� RentO i�l:ln[llllti i� ] pN's�on ArchiIC(AIII'c arC February 22, 2010 ED AC)A 3257 Rocale Timmons City of Renton Dept. of Community and Economic Development 1055 South Grady Way Renton, WA 98057 Reference: 460 Taylor Place NW, Parcel #9564800136 Subject: Buffer Enhancement Sign -off & As -built Plan Rocale, The buffer enhancement area at the Taylor Place NW site has been installed per the approved Buffer A veraging & Enhancement Plan dated 2-7-2008 to our satisfaction. It is our understanding that maintenance will occur on an on -going basis per the approved plan specifications. Changes made to the plan included a slight reconfiguration of the buffer replacement and enhancement area that resulting in a little additional buffer area. The attached as -built drawing (Figure 1) depicts the installed location of plantings. and photo -points for utilization during the 5-year performance monitoring period. Here are photos taken during the baseline review from the established photo -points. Photo -point 1. View looking NW Kil C Photo -point 2. View looking NE Thanks so much for your assistance on this project. We look forward to monitoring its success. If you have any questions, I can be reached via email at simone(a?aIto] iver.com or by phone at 425.333,4535. Rocale Timmons February 22, 2010 Page 2 Sincerely, ALTMANN OLIVER ASSOCIATES, LLC t Simone Oliver Landscape Architect Attachment: Figure 1 — As -built Planting Plan cc: via email: Jim Hanson PLAN LE6END1 PRC)PERTY L CENTERLINE OF EXI5TIN6 5TREAM t� 1 - - - - - - - - oHWM OF STREAM \ \ — 35' STREAM BUFFER �• „�� AVERA6ED DLL \ \ 5PL I T-RAIL FENCE 4 N6PA 51645 pp-## APPROXIMATE LOGATION OF PHOTO -POINTS IMPACT LEGEND DER R DLrTION bob 5F MITIGATION LEGEND + + + + + I ELFfER REPLACEMENT -IOO 5F V;ZAPHIO SOALE N (IN FEET) O 10 20 50 40 60 50ALE:1: 20 Am" 144 22 PLANTI NCB PLAN I 2q I MPAOTS AND M I TI COATI ON PLANT SOHEDULE 0 N �1\ \�o 59 e .00 C— 377ZEAN IS f ° l7q2--i �F i77i'q" man So • ` rah\a\ � f TREES SYMBOL SG I ENTI F I G NAME COMMON NAME 5PAGIN6 OTY. 51 ZE (MIND AGER 1316 LEAP MAPLE A5 5HOM 1 2 SAL. CORYLU5 CORNJTA HESTERN HAZEL.NVT A5 5HOM 2 2 GAL. P5El1DOT5U6A MENZIE511 D006LA5 FIR AS SHOWN 2 2 GAL. 54 a)55 -SYMBOL SGIENTIFIG NAME COMMON NAME 5PAGIN6 07Y. SIZE (MINj HOLOD15GU5 D15COLOR OGEAN SPRAY 5' O.C. 3 1 GAL. MAHONIA A92UIFOLIUM ORE60N GRAPE 3' O.G. 22 1 6AL. �n RIDES 5ANGUINi31M REED CURRANT 5' OjG. 4 1 GAL. R05A NUTKANA NOOTKA ROSE 3' O.G. 22 1 GAL. SYMBOL 5CIENTIFIG NAME COMMON NAME SPAGIN6 OTY. S1ZE (MINA POLYSTIC+UM MUNITUM 5HORD FERN 3' O.G. 2b 16AL. UA vS - e0a Denis Law Mayor July 30, 2009 Jim Hanson Hason Consulting 17446 Mallard Cove Lane Mt. Vernon, WA 98274 City of Department of Community & Economic Development Subject: Remaining Steps for Proceeding with Taylor LLA Monitoring Project Dear Mr. Hanson; We reviewed and approved the final revised wetland mitigation plan/monitoring proposal for City in December of 2008. This letter serves as a reminder that the mitigation project shall be installed in conformance with the approved plan prior to the final inspection of foundation for building permit CP08124. Mitigation Installation and Approval: Once the stream buffer mitigation has been installed (plants, signage, fencing, etc.) pursuant to the approved plan, please have your wetlands specialist provide me with written verification that the installation is in conformance with the approved plan. The date the City receives this written confirmation will constitute the beginning of the minimum 5-year maintenance and monitoring period. As Built Plans for the Mitigation Area: A copy of the as -built plans of the approved mitigation plan, prior to the final inspection of foundation for building permit CP08124, shall be provided. Monitoring and Maintenance Surety Amount: In order to provide you with the amount of security necessary for the maintenance and monitoring of the stream buffer mitigation plantings, signage, and fencing, we will need a copy of the signed maintenance and monitoring contract for this work. A draft (followed by a final) maintenance and monitoring contract (or contracts) for our review prior to execution of the contract shall be provided. The draft contract language must ensure compliance with all performance standards of the approved Altmann Oliver Associates, LLC mitigation plan as well the maintenance and monitoring standards of the Renton Municipal Code, The scope of the contract must clearly_cover the cost of plant maintenance and replacement as well. The Ianguape in the contract must also guarantee that "structures, improvements, and mitigation perform satisfactorily for a period of 5 years" (e.g. add provisions for plant replacement and weed removal referencing compliance with the survival rates noted in the final approved wetland mitigation plan. The contract must include quarterly monitoring reports for the first year and annual reports thereafter. The draft contract must be followed up with a final signed contract once the City approves the draft version. Once the City approves the contract proposal, the applicant wilt need to provide a maintenance surety device (a fetter of credit or irrevocable set aside letter) set at an amount totaling 125% of the cost to guarantee satisfactory performance for a minimum of five years. Renton City Hail 9 1055 South Grady Way • Renton, Washington 98057 • rentonwa.gov Please send all revised wetland -related information/plans to my attention. Feel free to contact me at 425-430-7219 if you have any questions regarding this letter. Sincerely, Roc le Timmons Associate Planner cc: Simone Oliver, Altman Oliver Associates, LLC Jennifer Henning, Planning Manager LUA08-016 CITY OF RENTON DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY & ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT MEMORANDUM Date: July 11, 2008 To: City Clerk's Office From: Stacy Tucker Subject: Land Use File Closeout Please complete the following information to facilitate project closeout and indexing by the City Clerk's Office. Project Name: Taylor Lot Line Adjustment LUA (file) Number: LUA-08-016, LLA, ECF Cross -References: AKA's: Project Manager: Rocale Timmons Acceptance Date: March 10, 2008 Applicant: C Hanson LLC Owner: same as applicant Contact: Jim Hanson, Hanson Consulting PID Number: 9564800136; 9987690010; 9987690020 ERC Approval Date: March 31, 2008 / Amended Approval: April 14, 2008 ERC Appeal Date: April 21, 2008 / Amended Approval Appeal End Date: May 5, 2008 Administrative Approval: June 26, 2008 Appeal Period Ends: Public Hearing Date: Date Appealed to HEX: By Whom: HEX Decision: Date: Date Appealed to Council: By Whom: Council Decision: Date: Mylar Recording Number: 20080709900007 Project Description: The applicant is requesting Environmental (SEPA) Review and a Lot Line Adjustment to adjust the lot lines for three parcels on a .51 acre site into two lots for the future development of two single-family homes. The subject property is zoned Residential-8 (R-8), and is located in the 400 block of Talyor Place NW just south of NW 5th street. The current parcel size is 25,629 square feet and contains 2,545 square feet of critical areas on -site including a Category 4 stream and critical slopes. The proposed project would result in impacts to the stream buffer on site through proposed buffer averaging. Location: 453 Taylor Ave NW; 460 Taylor PI NW; Vacant Lot Comments: 4/14/08 - Secondary review of the ERC determination completed. ERC reissued an amended ERC determination. Appeal period ends 5/5/08. Y CITY )F RENTON ,.0 Denis Law, Mayor N June 30, 2008 Jim Hanson Hanson Consulting 17446 Mallard Cove Lane Mt Vernon, WA 98274 SUBJECT: Taylor Lot Line Adjustment File No. LUA08-016, LLA Dear Mr, Hanson: Department of Community and Economic Development Alex Pietsch, Administrator The City of Renton has approved the above referenced lot line adjustment and has forwarded the final mylars to King County for recording. Please note the recording of the lot line adjustment map alone does not transfer ownership of property. If necessary, prepare and record a deed transferring ownership of the portion of land depicted in the lot line adjustment map. We recommend that the legal description for this document be prepared by a surveyor. It is the applicant's responsibility to ensure this document is properly prepared and recorded with the County. If you have any further questions regarding this lot line adjustment, please contact me at (425) 430-7219. Sincerely, ocale Timmons Associate Plarmer cc: Yellow file 1055 South Grady Way - Renton, Washington 98057 SThis paper contains 50%a recycled material, 30 % post consumer RENTON AHEAD OF THE CURVE 'y *NF, �DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY & ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT ♦+�0,; M E M O R A N D U M DATE: June 30, 2008 TO: City Clerk's Office FROM: Rocale Timmons, Planning, x7219 SUBJECT: Taylor Lot Line Adjustment; File No. LUA08-016, LLA Attached please find two sets of the above -referenced mylar and three copies for recording with King County. Please have Champion Couriers take these documents via: Same -day service ($13.81)-10:00 AM deadline to City Clerk Attached is a check for the amount of $13.81 for the fee to Champion Couriers. According to Finance, the King County recording fees for this and all subsequent plat recordings should be charged to account #000/007.590.0060.49.00001.4. Please call me at xPlanner ext if you have any questions. Thank you. cc: Yellow file Property Services Jan Conklin C. Hanson LLC / Owner CITY OF RENTON PLANNING/BUILDING/PUBLIC WORKS MEMORANDUM DATE: June 25, 2008 TO: Sonja Fesser, Property Services FROM: Rocale Timmons, Current Planning, x7219 SUBJECT: Taylor Lot Line Adjustment, File No. LUA08-016, LLA, ECF Attached is the most recent version of the above -referenced lot line adjustment. if all Property Services concerns have been addressed and you are now able to recommend recording of the mylar, please initial this memo below and return to me as soon as possible. However, if you have outstanding concerns or require additional information in order to recommend recording, please let me know. Thank you. Property Services approval: Robert T. Mac Onie, Jr. PLS D to Sonja ess Dat CC' Yellow File H:1Division.slDevelop.ser\Dev&plan.inglPROJECT5108-016.Rocale\Approval Memo 08-016.doe I CITY OF RENTON PLANNING/BUILDING/PUBLIC WORKS MEMORANDUM DATE: May 12, 2008cV TO: Rocale Timmons M J FROM: Sonja J. Fesser' SUBJECT: Taylor Lot Line Adjustment, LUA-08-016-LLA Format and Legal Description Review Bob Mac Onie and I have reviewed the above referenced lot line adjustment submittal and have the following comments: Comments For the Applicant: Note the City of Renton land use action number and land record number, LUA-08-016- LLA and LND-30-0339, respectively, on the drawing. The type size used for the, land record number should be smaller than that used for the land use action number. Said numbers need be noted only once per drawing sheet (upper left-hand corner of each sheet). Indicate what has been set at the existing corners of the proposed lots. Note all easements, covenants and agreements of record on the drawing. Can the water easement, recorded under Rec. No. 4542262, be identified on the drawing (currently noted as Item No_ 2 under "EXCEPTIONS FROM THE TITLE REPORT" on Sheet .1 of 2)? The city will provide an address for proposed Lot Ias soon as possible. Note both addresses in the spaces provided on Sheet I of 2. On the final lot line adjustment submittal, remove all references to concrete, topog lines, trees, utilities facilities (on lot line adjustment drawing and "LEGEND") and other items not directly impacting the subdivision. The City of Renton Administrator of the Department of Public Works is the only city official who signs this lot line adjustment. Note the change in the title of said official. Pertinent King County approval blocks also need to be noted on the drawing. V I ARle SysILNIa - t end Subdivision & Surveying RecordslLND-30 - Lot Kane Adjustments1D3391RVOF80S 12.doc May 15, 2008 Page 2 Draw a horizontal line on said lot line adjustment separating the City's approval block from the county's approval block. All vested owner(s) of the subject lot line adjustment need to sign the final submittal. Include a corporate form of acknowledgment for the notary (not the individual form currently shown). Revise the title of the declaration block to: "OWNER'S DECLARATION". Note that if there are easements, restrictive covenants or agreements to others (City of Renton, etc.) as part of this lot line adjustment, they can be recorded concurrently with the lot line adjustment. The lot line adjustment submittal and the associated document(s) are to be given to the Project Manager as a package. The associated document(s) are to be referenced on the lot line adjustment submittal, with spaces provided for the recording numbers thereof. Remove the tree legend (Sheet 2 of 2). Change "BOUNDARY" to LOT in the block noted in the upper left-hand corner of Sheet 2 of 2. The last three paragraphs under the "NOTES" block (Sheet 1 of 2) do not directly impact the recording of this lot line adjustment — said paragraphs should be removed from the submittal. Remove the "APPROVAL NOTES" block (center top of Sheet 1 of 2) from the submittal "KCC 19A.28" does not apply to this lot line adjustment. Note the bearings and distances of the "old lot lines" on the lot line adjustment drawing (Sheet 2 of 2). See the attachments for circled items that need to be addressed Fee Review Comments: Lots within or affected by the lot line adjustment are subject to the city's special charges, if any. KT le 5ys%LND - Land Subdivision & Surveying Records\LND-30 - Lot Line AdjustInents%03391RV080512.docicor fA r_ r I\ 11-1 V f-%L i V V 1 L_ Q. F1 #1LIV-i VIV7 V7Y"i-t%-7i IItVV f VIV I DT LINE ADJUSTMENT D. J A- - - VD- - DECLARATION V BY THESE PRESENT THAT WE THE UNDERSIGNED THE LAND HEREIN DESCRIBED DO HEREBY MAKE A E ADJUSTMENT THEREOF PURSUANT TO RCW 58. 1 Z 040 THIS ADJUSTMENT TO BE THE GRAPHIC 7N OF THE SAME, AND THAT SAID ADJUSTMENT IS E FREE CONSENT AND IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE YE OWNER(S) IN WITNESS W14EREOF WE HAVE SET OUR E ALS. 'SON, MANAGING MEMBER OF C. HANSON LLC SH1�N AT I KNOW OR HAVE SATISFACTORY EVIDENCE THAT INSON INSTRUMENT AND ACKNOWLEDGED IT TO BE HIS FREE RY ACT FOR THE USES AND PURPOSE$ MENTIONED IN .NT. '_IC IN AND FOR THE STATE" OF WASHINGTON ON EXPIRES _ CITY OF RENTON PTMENT UBUC WORKS APPROVED THIS ---- DAY OF 20__. ADMINISTRATOR JC�.r Ci tt �C?Gn KING COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF ASSESSMENTS EXAMINED & APPROVED THIS ___ DAY OF _ _ __ . �, 20_ KING COUNTY ASSESSOR DEPUTY'. KING. COUNTY .-ASSESSOR I ': THIS REQUEST QUALIFIES FOR EXEMPTION UNDER K-C-C--1-9A.28. IT DOES NOT GUARANTEE THAT THE LOTS WILL 'BE S-UITABLE FOR DEVELOPMENT NOW OR IN THE FUTURE. THE LLGAL TRANSFER OF THE PROPERTY MUST BE DONE BY SEPARATE INSTRUMENT UNLESS ALL LOTS HEREIN ARE UNDER THE SAME OWNERSHIP. �1�'9'fiC OF"' REDf�Q�I F,Ib�_ NUIt�B�R ORIGINAL LEGAL DES'CRIPTION.• % G.x j�" �� S DU f 36 PARCEL A: LOT 8, BLOCK 4, WOODY GLEN ADDITION, ACCORDING TO THE PLAT THEREOF, RECORDED 1N VOLUME 47 OF PLATS, PAGE 91, IN KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON: EXCEPT THAT PORTION THEREOF LYING SOUTH OF A LINE RUNNING FROM THE MOST WESTERLY CORNER OF SAID LOT TO A POINT 120 FEET DISTANT (MEASURED ALONG THE SOUTHERLY BOUNDARY THEREOF) FROM THE MOST SOUTHERLY CORNER THEREOF. PARCEL B: LOT 9, BLOCK 4, WOODY GLEN ADDIRON, ACCORDING TO THE PLAT THEREOF RECORDED IN VOLUME 47 OF PLATS, PAGE 91, IN KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON; EXCEPT THE WESTERLY 120 FEET THEREOF-. PARCEL C.- THAT POR77ON OF LOT 5, BLOCK 4, WOODY GLEN ADDITION, ACCORDING TO THE PLAT THEREOF RECORDED IN VOLUME 47 OF PLATS, PAGE 91, IN KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON, L rNG SOUTH OF A LINE RUNNING FROM i-HE MOST EASTERLY CORNER OF SAID LOT TO A POINT ON THE WESTERLY MARGIN OF SAID LOT, 45 FEET NORTHERLY FROM THE MOST SOUTHERLY CORNER OF SAID LO r .BASIS OF BEARINGS. THE BASIS OF BEARINGS FOR THIS MAP 15- BETWEEN THE TWO FOUND MONUMENTS IN THE CENTERLINE OF NW 5TH STREET, BEARING = N78'29'08"E PER PLAT OF WOODY GLEN ADDITION, 47/91-92, AS SHOWN. CROSS REFERENCE., �7EPERENCE IS MADE TO THE FOLLOWING SURVEYS FOR SECTION SUBDIVISION AND PC, INFORMATION: -PLAT OF WOODY GLEN ADDITION, VOLUME 47, PAGES 91-92 -` RECORD OF SURVEY, BOOK 155, PAGE 104 RECORO OF KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON LOT ADDRESSES. LOT 1: rAYLOR PLACE NW RENTON, WASHINGTON 98055 LOT 2: TAYLOR AVENUE NW RENTON, WAS14INGTON 98055 NOTES: FIELD MEASUREMENTS FOR THIS SURVEY PERFORMED WITH A 2" TOPCON TOTAL STATION USING TRAVERSE METHODS THAT MEET OR EXCEED ACCURACY REQUIREMENTS CONTAINED IN WAC 332.130.090. EXISTING PARCEL A: 14, 87.5f SF PARCEL B: 90561- SF PARCEL C: 16871 SF PORTION OF PARCEL AREAS REVISE. LOT 1 B337f SF STREAM BUFFER 3505f Sr NET AREA 48321 SF NET S THE WHI THE BOUNDARY CORNERS AND LINES DEPICTED ON THIS MAP ARE PER RECORD TITLE INFORMATION AND REPRESENT DEED LINES ONLY. THEY DO NOT PURPORT TO SHOW OWNERSHIP LINES THAT MAY OTHERWISE BE DETERMINED BY A COURT OF LAW. i2� s� ST.:...:........ STREET fzlw 'o, bi. 30 30 13. LOCIC 4 lopil WDiT GLEN 1 91-9 -WOOpy pAGEs ;3C ttjgE 47 f.-. vo 12"CULVERT LIN t ro NP. -2, 1 -4� 32 0,u $1 29 C�l 7L `p FOUND CONCRETE MONUMENT IN CASE WITH TACK REWON MONUMENT #1899 N. 55495.649 E.• 395359-447' (VISITED 11104) �STBEET —4� ATE5 - -. ., ( �-4, V, STREW + + + + + + A 22 + + 7 + -4 bc 14 + + LOT 2 17,2921- SF LOT I BJJ7± SF a 12 144.22( 010------ Ar 8B Ln R GARAGE UX 6. 4, Jo, 10 2 1 B, ocfc 6 PARK,,," _01TION 1 U PACE 81 LEGEND: FOUND SET R1 �H TA, -4WER W -WAfT-.R -MAItBC RIW RIGHT (H) iNDICA'. (M) WDICA-, (P) INDICA', (P2) INDICA (R) )ND ICA CRITICI F:F� + 35' S7 City of Rer, ton Department of Community & Economic Development ENVIRONMENTAL & DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: COMMENTS DUE: MARCH 24, 2008 APPLICATION NO: LUA08-016, LLA, ECF DATE CIRCULATED: MARCH 10, 2008 APPLICANT: Jim Hanson PLANNER: Rocale Timmons ,,: , >... PROJECT TITLE: Taylor Lot Line Adjustment PLAN REVIEWER: Mike Dotson ,-ram s . SITE AREA: 25,269 square feet EXISTING BLDG AREA (gross): NIA V . LOCATION: 400 Block of Taylor Place NW PROPOSED BLDG AREA(gross) NIA WORK ORDER NO: 77872 SUMMARY OF PROPOSAL: The applicant is requesting Environmental (SEPA) Review and a Lot Line Adjustment to adjust the lot lines on a .51 acre site into two lots for the future development of two single-family homes The subject property is zoned Residential-8 (R-8), and is located in the 400 block of Talor Place NW just south of NW 5th street. The current parcel size is 25,629 square feet and contains 2,545 square feet of critical areas on -site including a Category 4 stream and critical slopes. The proposed project would result in impacts to the stream on site and their associated buffer areas. A. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT (e.g. Non -Code) COMMENTS Element of the Environment Probable Minor Impacts Probable Major Impacts More Information Necessary Earth Air Water Plants Land/Shoreline Use Animals Environmental Health Energyl Natural Resources B. POLICY -RELATED COMMENTS C. CODE-RELA TED COMMENTS Element of the Environment Probable Minor Impacts Probable Major Impacts More Information Necessary Housing Aesthetics Li htlGlare Recreabon Utilities Transportation Public Services HlstoriclCultural Preservation Airport Environment 10 000 Feet 14 000 Feet We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas in which we have expertise and have identified areas of probable impact or areas where additional information is needed to properly assess this proposal Signature of Director or Authorized Representative Date TAYLOR LOT LINE ADJUSTMENT CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL LUA 08-016 Project Condition Source of When Compliance Party Notes Condition is Required Res onsible A stream mitigation plan shall be submitted per RNIC 4 8- l 20. Administrator Prior to the issuance of Applicant The mitigation plan shall include a buffer enhancement plan building or construction usingnative vegetation that enhances or improves the functional permits, whichever corner attributes of the buffer. A maintenance and monitoring plan for first. a period no less than five years, shall also be provided in the mitigation plan. The final mitigation plan must be submitted to and approved by the Current Planning Division project manager. After the approval of the final mitigation plan, a performance Administrator Prior the issuance Applicant surety per RMC 4-1-230 must be paid to the City of Renton for building or construction the maintenance and monitoring period. permits, whichever comes first. A Temporary Erosion and Sedimentation Control Plan (TLSCP) FRC Prins to issuance of the Applicant designed pursuant to the State Department of Ecology's Erosion utility and and Sediment Control Requirements, outlined in Volume lI of buildinb permits. permits. the 2001 Storinwater Management Manual shall be submitted to ,,, and approved by the Development Services Plan Review staff. The applicant will be required to comply with the ERC Prior to issuance of :applicant recommendations found in the geotechnical report prepared by building permits. Bergquist Engineering Services. A covenant shall be placed on the face of the Taylor Lot Line Prior to the recording of Applicant Adjustment stating there be a 10-foot buffer between the edge of ERC the Lot Line Adjustment the footing for a new single family residence and the face of the steep slope on Lot 2. A Native Growth Protection Easement shall be placed over that Prior to issuance of Applicant part of the site encompassing the stream and buffer area, where ERC, building permits, not covered by the house, walkway, or driveway. Restrictive covenants shall also be placed on the lot to this affect. Ilaul hours are limited from 8:30 atn to 3:30 pm Monday Code During Project Applicant/ through Friday Construction Contractors Builder Taylor Lot Line Adjustment Short Plat Conditions of Approval Page 2 of 2 Within 30 days of completion of grading %vork the applicant Code During Project Applicant- shall hydroseed or plant appropriate vegetation. Construction Contractor, Builder Construction hours are from 7:00 am to 8:00 pm Monday Code During Project Applicant through Friday and 9:00 am to 8:00 pm on Saturday and no Construction Contractor/ work is allowed on Sundays. Builder CC: City of Renton File LUA 08-016 Mike Dotson, Plan Reviewer Neil Watts, Development Services Director C.E. Vincent, Planning Director Jennifer I Ienning. Current Planning Manager Larry Meckling, Building Official Kayren Kiltrick. Development Fngineer Supervisor STATE OF WASHINGTON, COUNTY OF KING } AMENDED NOTICE OF AFFIDAVIT OF PUBLICATION ENVIRONMENTAL. DETERMINATION ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COMMITTEE PUBLIC NOTICE RENTON, WASIIINGTON Linda M Mills, being first duly sworn on oath that she is the Legal The Environmental Review Committee has issued an Amended Determinalion Advertising Representative of the of Nun-Significance-Miligated For the following project under the authority of the Renton Municipal Code. Taylor Lot Line Adj ustment Renton Reporter LUA08-016, LLa, ECF Localion; 400 Blk of Taylor Place NW, Applicant requests a Lot Line Adjustment to adjust the lot lines for 3 parcels on a 0.5 [-acre site into 2 lots and a bi-weekly newspaper, which newspaper is a legal newspaper of Environmental (SEPA) Review for the general circulation and is now and has been for more than six months future development of 2 single-family prior to the date of publication hereinafter referred to, published in homes. The current parcel size is 25,629 square feet and contains 2,545 square the English language continuously as a bi-weekly newspaper in King feet of critical areas on -site including County, Washington. The Renton Reporter has been approved as a Class 4 stream and protected slopes. The project proposes to average' the a Legal Newspaper by order of the Superior Court of the State of stream buffer on site from 35 feet to a Washington for Kin County. g g y minimum width of 2i feet. Appeals of the environmental The notice in the exact form annexed was published in regular issues determination must be filed in writing of the Renton Reporter (and not in supplement form) which was on or before 5:00 PM on Mav 5. 2008. regularly distributed to its subscribers during the below stated period. Appeals must he filed in writing together with the required $75.00 application fee The annexed notice, a: with: Hearing Examiner, City of Renton, Public Notice t055 South Grady Way, Renton, WA 98057. Appeals to the Examiner are governed by City of Renton Municipal Code Section 4-8-t10.B. Additional information regarding the appeal process was published on April 19, 2008. p p may be obtained from the Renton City Clerk's Office, (425) 430-6510. Published in the Renton Reporter on April l9,2008.969082. The full amount of the fee charged for said foregoing publication is the sum of $105.00. �( DAB Linda M. Mills -� ass`°" Legal Advertising Representative, Renton Reporter - ejAR�_ �- Subscribed and sworn to me this 21 st day of April, 2008. = ° • N' to o 9j �L) 19'� ��+ft i OF WA Katy Dal - otary Public f6f the State of Washington, Residing in Covin n, Washington P. 0. Number: "-y a CITY F RENTON /+- Department of Community and ,.0 Economic Development Denis Law, Mayor Alex Pietseh, Administrator April 18, 2008 Jim Hanson Hanson Consulting 17446 Mallard Cove Lane Mt Vernon, WA 98274 SUBJECT: Taylor Lot Line Adjustment LUA08-016, LLA, ECF Dear Mr. Hanson: This letter is written on behalf of the Environmental Review Committee (ERC) to advise you that they have completed a secondary review of the subject project and have issued an amended threshold Determination of Non -Significance -Mitigated with Mitigation Measures. Please refer to the enclosed ERC Report and Decision, Part 2, Section B for a list of the Mitigation Measures. Appeals of the environmental determination must be filed in writing on or before 5:00 PM on May 5, 2008. Appeals must be filed in writing together with the required S75.00 application fee with: Hearing Examiner, City of Renton, 1055 South -Grady Way, Renton, WA 98057. Appeals to the Examiner are governed by City of Renton Municipal Code Section 4-8-110.B. Additional information regarding the appeal process may be obtained from the Renton City Cleric's Office, (425) 430-6510. If the Environmental Determination is appealed, a public hearing date will be set and all parties notified. The preceding information will assist you in planning for implementation of your project and enable you to exercise your appeal rights more fully, if you choose to do so. If you have any questions or desire clarification of the above, please call me at (425) 430-7219. For the Environmental Review Committee, lRoale Timmons Associate Planner Enclosure cc: Robert Rively, Mary Jo Carlson, Roberta & Ronnie McDonald, Bruce & Sue Gregg, Roland.& Deloris Dewing, Karen Walter /. Party(ies) of Record 1055 South Grady Way - Renton, Washington 98057 i V O AFIF.Ap OF THE CURVE l This paper contains 50%recydedmate6al,30%post consumer CITY F RENTON + + Department of Community and ..0 Economic Development Denis Law, Mayor Alex Pietsch, Administrator April 18, 2008 Washington State Department of Ecology Environmental Review Section PO Box 47703 OIympia, WA 98504-7703 Subject: Amended Environmental Determination Transmitted herewith is a copy of the Amended Environmental Determination for the following project reviewed by the Environmental Review Committee (ERC) on April 14, 2008: DETERMINATION OF NON -SIGNIFICANCE -MITIGATED PROJECT NAME: Taylor Lot Line Adjustment PROJECT NUMBER- LUA08-016, LLA, ECF LOCATION: 400 Block of Taylor Avenue NW DESCRIPTION: The applicant is requesting a Lot.Line Adjustment to adjust the lot lines for three parcels on a 0.51-acre .site into two lots and Environmental (SEPA) Review for the future development of two single-family homes. The subject property is. zoned Residential-8 (R-8), and is located in the 400 block of Taylor Place NW just south of NW 5th Street, The current parcel size is 25,629 square feet and contains 2,545 square feet of critical areas on -site including a Class stream and protected slopes. The project proposes, to average the stream buffer on site from 35 feet to a miuimuin width of 25 feet. Appeals of the environmental determination must be filed in writing on or before 5:00 PM on May 5, 2008. Appeals must be filedin writing together with the required $75.00 application fee with: Hearing. Examiner, City of Renton, 1055 South Grady Way, Renton, WA, 98057. Appeals to: the Examiner are governed by City of Renton Municipal Code Section 4-8-110.B_ Additional information regarding the appeal process may be obtained from the Renton City Clerk's Office, (425) 430-6510.. If you have questions, please call me at (425) 430-7219. For the Environmental Review Committee, Ro le Timmons Associate Planner Enclosure cc: King County Wastewater Treatment Division WDFW, Stewart Reinbold David F. Dietzman, Department of Natural Resources WSDOT, Northwest Region Duwamish Tribal Office Karen Walter, Fisheries, Muckleshoot Indian Tribe 1055 South Grady Way - Renton, Washington 98057 This paper contains 5G% reryeled material, 30%past consumer RENTON AHEAD OF THP, CURVE i AMENDED ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION ISSUANCE OF A DETERMINATION OF NON -SIGNIFICANCE -MITIGATED (DNS-M) POSTED TO NOTIFY INTERESTED PERSONS OF AN ENVIRONMENTAL ACTION PROD ECT NAME: Taylor Let[.in- Adjustment PROJECT NVMBER_ LUA08-015. LLA. ECP LOCATION: 41 Block of Taylor Avenue NW DESCRIPTION: Ti applicant is requesting a Lot Line Adjustment to adjust the lot hoes for three parcels n a 0.51-acre site into two loss and Environmental (SEPA) Review for the iuture development of two singletamily homes. The subject property is zoned Residential (R-61. and is located in the 400 Block of Taylor Place NW just south of NW 5lh Street. The —art parcel size is 25,529 square feet and contains 2545 square feet of crihcai areas on -site including a Class 4 stream and pnotecled slopes. The project proposes to average the stream buffer on site from 35 feet to a minimum width of 25 feet. THE CITY OF RFNTON ENVIRONMENTAL REVIFW COMMITTEE (i HAS DETERMINED THAT THE PROPOSED ACTION DOES NOT HAVE A SIGNIFICANT ADVERSE IMPACT ON THE ENVIRONMENT. Appeals of the—irenmental determination must be filed in writing on or hefore 5:00 PM on May 5, 2C08. Appeals ust be fled in writing together with the required S75.00 application fee with Hearing Examiner. City of Renton, 1055 South Grady way, Renton, WA 88057. Appeals to the Examiner are governed by City of Renton Municipal Code Section 4-8-110, 8. Additional information regarding the appeal process may he obtained tram the Renton City Clerk's Office, 14251 430-5510. IF THE ENVIRONMENTAL DETER10tNATION IS APPEALED, A PUBLIC HEARING WILL BE SET AND - I OtPl-1 S Kir%TIFIFTI FOR FURTHER INFORMATION, PLEASE CONTACT THE CITY OF RENTON, DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY E, ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT AT (425) 430-72l DO NOT REMOVE THIS NOTICE WITHOUT PROPER AUTHORIZATION Please include the project NUMBER when calling for proper file identification - CERTIFICATION I, 't icLv > > �c�t��c ` hereby certify that copies of the above docurt� NN were postedby me in conspicuous laces or nearby the described ro ert �� '� H�f� P Y P P Y P p Y_ "• � f� Z DATE: W i 1 ' f V Gt SIGNED: A� 4' % r w ATTEST: Subscribed and sworn before me, a Notary Public, in and for the State of Washington residing'/ on the E i day of t ~ — NOTARY PUBLIC SIGNA AMENDED ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION ISSUANCE OF A DETERMINATION OF NON -SIGNIFICANCE - MITIGATED (DNS-M) POSTED TO NOTIFY INTERESTED PERSONS OF AN ENVIRONMENTAL ACTION PROJECT NAME: Taylor Lot Line Adjustment PROJECT NUMBER: LUA08-016, LLA, ECF LOCATION: 400 Block of Taylor Avenue NW DESCRIPTION: The applicant is requesting a Lot Line Adjustment to adjust the lot lines for three parcels on a 0,51-acre site into two lots and Environmental (SEPA) Review for the future development of two single- family homes. The subject property is zoned Residential-8 (R-8), and is located in the 400 block of Taylor Place NW just south of NW 5th Street. The current parcel size is 25,629 square feet and contains 2,545 square feet of critical areas on -site including a Class 4 stream and protected slopes. The project proposes to average the stream buffer on site from 35 feet to a minimum width of 25 feet. THE CITY OF RENTON ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COMMITTEE (ERC) HAS DETERMINED THAT THE PROPOSED ACTION DOES NOT HAVE A SIGNIFICANT ADVERSE IMPACT ON THE ENVIRONMENT. Appeals of the environmental determination must be filed in writing on or before 5:00 PM on May 5, 2008. Appeals must be filed in writing together with the required $75.00 application fee with: Hearing Examiner, City of Renton, 1055 South Grady Way, Renton, WA 98057. Appeals to the Examiner are governed by City of Renton Municipal Code Section 4-8-110.B. Additional information regarding the appeal process may be obtained from the Renton City Clerk's Office, (425) 430-6510. IF THE ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION IS APPEALED, A PUBLIC HEARING WILL BE SET AND ALL PARTIES NOTIFIED, FOR FURTHER INFORMATION, PLEASE CONTACT THE CITY OF RENTON. DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY & ECONOMIC DFVELOPMENT AT (425) 430-720D. DO NOT REMOVE THIS NOTICE WITHOUT PROPER AUTHORIZATION Please include the Project NUMBER when calling for proper file identification. CITY OF RENTON AMENDED DETERMINATION OF NON -SIGNIFICANCE -MITIGATED ADVISORY NOTES APPLICATION NO(S): LUA08-016, LLA, ECF APPLICANT: Hanson Consulting; Jim Hanson PROJECT NAME; Taylor Lot Line Adjustment DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSAL: The applicant is requesting a Lot Line Adjustment to adjust the lot lines for three parcels on a 0.51-acre site into two lots and Environmental (SEPA) Review for the future development of two single-family homes. The subject property is zoned Residential-8 (R-8), and is located in the 400 block of Taylor Place NW just south of NW 5th Street. The current parcel size is 25,629 square feet and contains 2,545 square feet of critical areas on -site including a Class 4 stream and protected slopes. The project proposes to average the stream buffer on site from 35 feet to a minimum width of 25 feet. LOCATION OF PROPOSAL: .400 Block of Taylor Ave NW LEAD AGENCY: The City of Renton Department of Community & Economic Development Planning Division Advisory Notes to Applicant: The following notes are supplemental information provided in conjunction with the environmental determination. Because these notes are provided as information only, they are not subject to the appeal process for environmental determinations. Planning: 1. RMC section 4-4-030,C.2 limits haul hours between 830 am to 3:30 pm, Monday through Friday unless otherwise approved by the Development Services Division. The Development Services Division reserves the right to rescind the approved extended haul hours 'at any time if complaints are received.. 2. Within thirty (30) days of completion of grading work, the applicant shall hydroseed or plant an appropriate ground cover over any portion of the site that is graded or cleared of vegetation and where no further construction work will occur within ninety (00) days. Alternative measures such asmulch, sodding, or plastic covering as specified in the current King County Surface Water Management Design Manual as. adopted by the City of Renton may be proposed between the dates of November 1st and March 31st of each year_ The Development Services Division's approval of this work is required prior to final inspection and approval of the permit. 3. Commercial, multi -family, new single-family and other nonresidential construction activities shall be restricted to the hours between seven o'clock (7:00) a.m. and eight o'clock (8:00) p.m., Monday through Friday. Work on Saturdays shall be restricted to the hours between nine o'clock (9:00) a.m. and eight o'clock (8:00) p.m. No work shall be permitted on Sundays. 4. All landscaping shall be irrigated by an approved irrigation system prior to final occupancy permits. Fire: 1. Hydrants should be fully operational before combustible construction is allowed. 2. Both temporary and permanent addressing is to be visible from the public right of way. 3. A hammerhead turnaround should be provided on Taylor Ave NW. ERC Advisory Notes Page 1 of 1 CITY OF RENTON AMENDED DETERMINATION OF NOWSIGNIFICANCE-MITIGATED MITIGATION MEASURES APPLICATION NO(S): LUA08-016, LLA, ECF APPLICANT: Hanson Consulting; Jim Hanson PROJECT NAME: Taylor Lot Line Adjustment DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSAL: The applicant is requesting a Lot Line Adjustment to adjust the lot lines for three parcels on a 0.51-acre site into two lots and Environmental (SEPA) Review for the future development of two single-family homes. The subject property is zoned Residential-8 (R=8), and is located in the 400 block of Taylor Place NW just south of NW 5th Street, The current parcel size is 25,629 square feet and contains 2,546 square feet of critical areas on -site including a Class 4 stream and protected slopes. The project proposes to average the stream buffer on site from 35 feet to a minimum width of 25 feet. LOCATION OF PROPOSAL: 400 Block of Taylor Ave NW LEAD AGENCY: The City of Renton Department of Community & Economic Development Planning Division MITIGATION MEASURES: 1, The applicant will be required to submit a Temporary Erosion and Sedimentation Control Plan (TESCP) designed pursuant to the State Department of Ecology's. Erosion and Sediment Control Requirements, outlined in Volume 11 of.the 2001 Storrnwater Management Manual. The,plan must be submitted to and approved by the Development Services Plan Review staff prior to issuance of the utility construction and building permits. 2. The applicant will be required to comply with the recommendations found in the geotechnical report prepared by Bergquist Engineering Services prior to issuance of building permits. 3. A covenant shall be placed on the face of the Taylor Lot Line Adjustment stating there be a 10-foot buffer between the edge of the footing for a new single family residence and the face of the steep slope on Lot 2. 4. A Native Growth Protection Easement shall be,placed over that part of the site encompassing the stream and buffer area, where not covered by the house, walkway, or driveway. Restrictive covenants shall also be placed on the lot to this affect. The easement and restrictive covenants shall be recorded prior to issuance of building permits. ERC Mitigation Measures Page 1 of 1 CITY OF RENTON AMENDED DETERMINATION OF NON -SIGNIFICANCE (MITIGATED) APPLICATION NO(S): LUA08-016, LLA, ECF APPLICANT: Hanson Consulting; Jim Hanson PROJECT NAME: Taylor Lot Line Adjustment DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSAL: The applicant is requesting a Lot Line Adjustment to adjust the lot lines for three parcels on a 0.51-acre site into two lots and Environmental (SEPA) Review for the future development of two single-family homes. The subject property is zoned Residentiai-8 (R-8), and is located in the 400 block of Taylor Place NW just south of NW 5th Street. The current parcel size is 25,629 square feet and contains 2,545 square feet of critical areas on -site including a Class 4 stream and protected slopes. The project proposes to average the stream buffer on site from 35 feet to a minimum width of 25 feet. LOCATION OF PROPOSAL: 400 Block of Taylor Ave NW LEAD AGENCY: The City of Renton Department of Community & Economic Development Planning Division The City of Renton Environmental Review Committee has determined that it does not have a probable significant adverse impact on the environment. An Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) is not required under RCW 43.21C.030(2)(c). Conditions were imposed as mitigation measures by the Environmental Review Committee under their authority of Section 4-6-6 Renton Municipal Code. These conditions are necessary to mitigate environmental impacts identified during the environmental review process. Appeals of the environmental determination must be filed in writing on or before 5:00 PM on May 5, 2008. Appeals must be filed in writing together with the required $75.00 application fee with: Hearing Examiner, City of Renton, 1055 South Grady Way, Renton, WA 98057. Appeals to the Examiner are governed by City of Renton Municipal Code Section 4-8-110.B. Additional information regarding the appeal process may be obtained from the Renton City Clerk's Office, (425) 430-6510. PUBLICATION DATE: April 19, 2008 DATE OF DECISION: April 14, 2008 SIGNATURES: p P' / 16 regg Zi®rn,A min trator Dat I. David aniels, Fire Chief atePublic o Fire Department Terry Higashiyama, Administrator Date Alex Pietsch, Administrator Date Community Services Department of Community & Economic Development ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COMMITTEE MEETING NOTICE April 14, 2008 To: Gregg Zimmerman, Public Works Administrator Terry Higashiyama, Community Services Administrator 1. David Daniels, Fire Chief Alex Pietsch, CED Administrator From: Jennifer Henning, CED Planning Manager Meeting Date: Monday, April 14, 2008 Time: 3:00 PM Location: Sixth Floor Conference Room #620 Agenda listed below. Taylor Lot Line Adiustment -Amended CONSENT ITEM (Timmons) LUA08-016, LLA, ECF Location: 400 Block of Taylor Ave NW. Description: The applicant is requesting a Lot Line Adjustment to adjust the lot lines for three parcels on a 0.51-acre site into two lots and Environmental (SEPA) Review for the future development of two single-family homes. The subject property is zoned Residential-8 (R-8), and is located in the 400 block of Taylor Place NW just south of NW 5th Street. The current parcel size is 25,629 square feet and contains 2,545 square feet of critical areas on -site including a Class 4 stream and protected slopes. The project proposes to average the stream buffer on site from 35 feet to a minimum width of 25 feet.Project description from ERC report. Monopole l in Residential Zones Text Amendment (Lind) LUA08-025, ECF Location: Citywide. Description: The proposed amendment application would allow Monopole I structures on a one half acre lot with an Administrative Conditional Use Permit provided that they meet a one hundred feet (100') setback from residential, and create some additional flexibility within the code to allow a lesser setback with a Hearing Examiner Conditional Use Permit. In the public right-of-way, Monopole I would only be allowed on designated arterial roads. A Monopole I is defined as "A wireless communication support structure which consists of a freestanding support structure, less than sixty feet (60) in height erected to support wireless communications antennas and connecting appurtenances." The changes proposed are needed by wireless providers to continue providing service to Renton residents. DNR Dry Dock Removal (Wasser) LUA08-026, ECF, SM Location: Lake Washington, east of 4500 block of Lake Washington Boulevard. Description: The applicant is requesting environmental review (SEPA) and a Shoreline Substantial Development Permit for the removal of two abandoned, sunken dry docks. The dry docks are located on state-owned aquatic land within the harbor area of Lake Washington. The dry docks are each approximately 200 feet long, 65 feet wide, and 30 feet tali, including 20-foot tall wing walls. Removal would be accomplished in -water, using derrick barges, a crane, and a long -reach excavator. Two disposal barges would transport material away from the site. The work would occur over a 6-week period beginning mid -July. A silt curtain would be installed surrounding the area of work and would contain turbidity for an approximate 3 acre area. cc: D. Law, Mayor J. Covington, Chief Administrative Officer S. Dale Estey, CED Director D. Pargas, Assistant Fire Marshall N. Watts, Development Services Director C7 F. Kaufman, Tearing Examiner C. Duffy. Deputy Chief/Fire Marshal J. Medzegian. Council P, Hahn, Transportation Systems Director R. Lind, CED Planning Manager L. Warren, City Attorney ERG City of Renton Department of Community and Economic Development REPORT ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COMMITTEE REPORT (AMENDED) ERCMEETING DATE: (March 31, 2008) Revised April 14, 2008 Project Name: Taylor Lot Line Adjustment Owner: C, Hanson LLC; 17446 Mallard Cove Lane; Mt. Vernon, WA 98274 Applicant: Hanson Consulting; Jim Hanson; 17446 Mallard Cove Lane; Mt. Vernon, WA 98274 Contact: Hanson Consulting; Jim Hanson; 17446 Mallard Cove Lane; Mt. Vernon, WA 98274 File Number: LUA08-016, LLA, ECF Project :Manager: Rocale Timmons; Associate Planner Project Summary: The applicant is requesting a Lot Line Adjustment to adiust the lot lines for three parcels on a 0.51-acre site into two lots and Environmental (SEPA) Review for the future development of two single-family horses. The subject property is zoned Residential-S (R-8), and is located in the 400 block of Taylor Place NW j List south of NW 5th Street. The current parcel size is 25,629 square feet and contains 2,545 square feet of critical areas on -site including a Class 4 stream and protected slopes. The project proposes to average the stream buffer on site from 35 feet to a minimum width of 25 feet. Project Location: 400 Block of Taylor Ave NW Exist. Bldg, Area SF: NIA Proposed New Bldg. Area (footprint): N/A Proposed �Nlew Bldg. Area (gross): 4,500 sf .Site Area: 25,629 sf Total Building Area GSF: 4,500 sf STAFF Staff Recommends that the Environmental. Review Committee issue a RECO.UVENDATION: Determination of Nan -Significance - Mitigated (DNS-M). Project Location Map ERC Repon 08-016 doc City of Renton Department of'Comi y & Economic Development En mental Review Committee. Report TAYLOR LOT LEVi, ADJUSTMEVI _ LUA08-016, LLA, ECF Report of April 14, 2008 Page 2 of 5 PART ONE: PROJECT DESCRIPTION / BACKGROUND The applicant, Jim Hanson, is requesting Environmental (SEPA) Review for the future construction of two single-family residences. In addition to the Environmental Review a Lot Line .Adjustment has been requested. The vacant 0.51 acre site consists of three existing legal lots which would be consolidated into two lots with the proposed lot line adjustment. The site contains protected slopes and a Class 4 stream and 35-foot wide associated buffers. The site is undeveloped and is vegetated with a mix of deciduous trees and brush. The subject property is zoned Residential-8 (R-8), and is located in the 400 block of Talyor Place NW just south of NW 5th Street. Lot 1 would be approximately 9,360 square feet in size and Lot 2 would be about 12,855 square feet following the lot line adjustment. Access to Lot 1 will be gained from Taylor Place NW. Proposed access to Lot 2 would be gained from an extension of unimproved Taylor Avenue NW. Eventual project construction would require grading and excavation activities throughout the site for the installation of new building pads and utilities. A Class 4 stream has been identified and delineated on the project site. A Class 4 stream is a non-salmonid bearing intermittent stream and requires a minimum 35-foot buffer. The proposed project would reduce the 35-foot buffer to no less than 25 feet on Lot 1 to allow for a single family residence building pad. The total reduction of buffer is 608 square feet and will be replaced at a 1:1 ratio. Stream buffer enhancement is proposed as part of the buffer averaging which will result in the planting of native plants, Staff received comments from neighboring property owners regarding drainage concerns (Exhibit 4). Staff also received comments from the Muckleshoot Indian "Tribe Fisheries Division regarding classification of the stream on -site (Exhibit 6). PART TWO: ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW In compliance with RCW 43.21 C.240, the following environmental (SEPA) review addresses only those project impacts that are not adequately addressed under existing development standards and environmental regulations. A. Environmental Threshold Recommendation Based on analysis of probable impacts from the proposal, staff recommends that the Responsible Officials: Issue a DNS-M with a 14-day Appeal Period. B. Mitigation Measures 1. The applicant will be required to submit a Temporary Erosion and Sedimentation Control Plan (TFSCP) designed pursuant to the State Department of Ecology's Erosion and Sediment Control Requirements, outlined in Volume 11 of the 2001 Storinwater Management Manual. The plan must be submitted to and approved by the Development Services Plan Review staff prior to issuance of the utility construction and building permits. 2. The applicant will be required to comply with the recommendations found in the geoteclinical report prepared by Bergquist Engineering Services prior to issuance of building permits. 3. A covenant shall be placed on the face of the Taylor Lot Line Adjustment stating there be a 10-foot buffer between the edge of the footing for a new single family residence and the face of the steep slope on Lot 2. 4. A Native Growth Protection Easement shall be placed over that part of the site encompassing the stream and buffer area, where not covered by the house, walkway, or driveway. Restrictive covenants shall also be placed on the lot to this affect. The easement and restrictive covenants shall be recorded prior to issuance of building permits. F.RC Report 08-016.doc City of Renton Department of Comm & Economic Development Env rental Review Committee Report 7AYLOR LOT LIVE ADJUSTMENT LUA08-016, LLA, ECF Report of April 14, 2008 Page 3 of 5 C. Exhibits Exhibit l Lot Line Adjustment Plan Exhibit 2 Zoning Map Exhibit 3 Aerial Photograph Exhibit 4 [setter from Neighboring Property Owners Exhibit 5 Stream Buffer Averaging Approval Exhibit 6 Correspondence from the Muckleshoot Indian Tribe Fisheries Division D. Environmental Impacts L'he Proposal was circulated and reviewed by various City Departments and Divisions to determine whether the applicant has adequately identified and addressed environmental impacts anticipated to occur in conjunction with the proposed development. Staffreviewere have identified that the proposal is likely to have the following probable impacts: 1. Earth Impacts: The property consists of a terrace that slopes to the east with grades of 15 to 20 percent. On the northeastern portions of the site are two relatively steep areas sloping at gradients more than 40 percent (protected slopes), which are south of the stream on site. The site is covered with a thin layer of topsoil consisting of loose sandy silt. Underlying the topsoil there are intermittent layers of coarse grained soils including sand, gravel -sand, and sand -silt. The site is undeveloped and is vegetated with a mix of deciduous trees and brush. The applicant submitted a Geotecluilcal Engineering Study from Bergquist Frigineeritler Services (dated May 31, 2007). The report states that development of a new single-family house could be supported on conventional spread footing foundations. The report also recommends that there be a 10-foot buffer between the edge of the footing and the face of the steep slope on proposed Lot 2. The applicant's SEPA checklist indicates that earthwork activities associated with building single family residences will occur in order to create the appropriate grades for the installation of building pads and utilities. The most common form of instability on this slope would be related to erosion, and due to the relatively loose condition of existing, near surface soils and the granular nature of the material, erosion from surface water would be expected across much of the slopes area of the property. As a condition of approval the applicant will be required to submit a Temporary Erosion and Sedimentation Control Plan ('1 ESCP) designed pursuant to the State Department of Ecology's Erosion and Sediment Control Requirements, outlined in Volume 11 of the 2001 Stormwater Management Manual. The report also provided recommendations for slope stability, foundations, building floor support, fill soil considerations, site preparation and grading, underground utilities, building drains, exterior slabs, asphaltic pavements, structural fill, and seismic considerations. In order to limit impacts to the project site and neighboring properties that could occur during project construction, staff recommends as a mitigation measure that project construction comply with the recommendations found in the geotechnical report prepared by Bergquist Engineering Services. hn particular, the recommended 10-foot buffer between the edge of the footing and the face of the steep slope should be recorded on the face of the lot line adjustment tbr proposed Lot 2, Mitigation Measures: 1. The applicant will be required to submit a Temporary Erosion and Sedimentation Control Plan (TESCP) designed pursuant to the State Department of Ecology's Erosion and Sediment Control Requirements, outlined in Volume II of the 2001 Stormwater Management Manual. The plan must be submitted to and approved by the Development Services Division Plan Review staff prior to issuance of the utility construction and building permits and during construction. 2. The applicant will be required to comply with the recommendations found in the geotechnical report prepared by Bergquist Engineering Services prior to issuance of building permits. ERCReport 08-016.doc City afRenton Department of Cona y & Economic Development En mental Review Committee Report TAYLOR LOT LINE ADJUST1 E.Vt L UA08-016, LLA, ECF Report of April 14, 2008 Page 4 of 5 3. A covenant shall be placed on the face of the Taylor Lot Line Adjustment stating there be a 10-foot buffer between the edge of the footing for a new single family residence and the face of the steep slope on Lot 2 prior to the recording of the Lot Line Adjustment. Nexus: SEPA Environmental Regulations 2. Water a. Wetland, Streams, Lakes Impacts: A strearn has been identified, which flows west to east along the north border of the project site in a small ravine. The City's Streams and Lakes Map does not classify the stream. The applicant submitted a Stream Evaluation by Altmann Oliver Associates, LLC (dated February 19, 2008) delineating and classifying the stream on the project site as a Class 4 stream, A Class 4 stream is a non-salmonid bearing intermittent stream and requires a minimum 35-foot buffer. The stream was not observed during the dry season, so intermittence could not be confirmed. Comments were received from parties residing on NW 5"' Street, regarding stormwater runoff and the on -site stream_ The neighbors expressed concerti as to who would be responsible for the maintenance of the stream. They also questioned whether the proposal would increase flooding potential in the area. The maintenance responsibilities for the stream would be the responsibility of the property owners. As previously mentioned in Section 1 (Earth), the project would need to submit erosion control and sedimentation plans designed pursuant to the applicable Department of Ecology's requirements. Email correspondence was received from the Muckleshoot Indian Tribe Fisheries Division questioning the Class 4 stream designation applied to the subject property. Staff has determined that the Class 4 designation is the proper designation for the steam on site based on the hydrology of the drainage basin. The area is characterized by low lying bedrock, with little to no ability for the retention of groundwater to provide flows to the stnall drainage systems during the dry months of the year. This drainage system is largely culverted in the vicinity of the project site, including approximately 1,200+ feet of culvert downstream from the property. The section of stream that runs through this property is proposed to retrain .intact. Class 4 streams require a minimum 35-foot buffer; however the applicant has proposed a reduced buffer down to 25 feet through buffer averaging. The applicant has proposed to increase the buffer on certain portions of the site so there is no net loss. The reduced buffer would allow a small building pad on Lot 1 for a single family residence. The applicant indicated in the SEPA Checklist that approximately 608 square feet of stream buffer would be affected as a result of the proposed averaging. The applicant would create at) additional 608 square feet of stream buffer as part of the averaging proposal along with buffer enhancement. Stream buffer enhancerrient will result in the planting of native plants and the removal of dense Himalayan blackberry and Indian plum. A mitigation plan for the proposed stream buffer impacts was submitted with the project application. The applicant will be required to comply with RMC 4-3-050 Critical 1`lreas regulations to mitigate for any impacts permitted to the stream and its buffer. Staff will be recommending approval of the buffer averaging proposal subject to conditions. The decision for the buffer averaging proposal will be issued under a separate cover. Mitigation Measures: A Native Growth Protection Easement shall be placed over that part of the site encompassing the stream and buffer area, where not covered by the house, walkway, or driveway_ Restrictive covenants shall also be placed on the lot to this effect. The casement and restrictive covenants shall be recorded prior to issuance of building permits. Nexus: RMC 4-3-150.L_7 Critical Areas Regulations ERC Report 08-01 G.doc City of Renton Department of Comt y cue Economic Development En mental Review Committee Report TAYLOR LOT LINE ADJUSTUEA i L UA08-016, LLA, ECF Report of April 14, 2008 Page 5 of 5 E. Comments of Reviewing Departments The proposal has been circulated to City Department and Division Reviewers. Where applicable, their comments have been incorporated into the text of this report and/or "Advisory Notes to Applicant." ✓ Copies of all Review Comments are contained in the Official File and may be attached to this report. Environmental Determination Appeal Process Appeals of the environmental determination must be filed in writing on or before 5:00 PM, May 5, 2008. Renton Municipal Code Section 4-8-110.13 governs appeals to the hearing Examiner. Appeals must be filed in writing at the City Clerk's office along with a $75.00 application fee. Additional information regarding the appeal process may be obtained from the City Clerk's Office, Renton City Hall - 7th Floor, 1055 S. Grady Way, Renton WA 98057. AD VISOR YNOTES TO APPLICANT The following notes are supplemental information provided in conjunction with the administrative land use action. Because these notes are provided us information only, they are riot sul?ject to the appeal process for the land use actions. Planning: 1. RMC section 4-4-030.C.2 limits haul hours between 8:30 am to 3:30 pm, Monday through Friday unless otherwise approved by the Development Services Division. The Development Services Division reserves the right to rescind the approved extended haul hours at any time if complaints are received. 2. Within thirty (30) days of completion of grading work, the applicant shall hydroseed or plant an appropriate ground cover over any portion of the site that is graded or cleared of vegetation and where no further construction work will Occur within ninety (90) days, Alternative measures such as mulch, sodding, or plastic covering as specified in the current King County Surface Water Management Design Manual as adopted by the City of Renton may be proposed between the dates of November .Ist and March 31st ofeach year. "rhe Development Services Division's approval of this work is required prior to final inspection and approval of the permit. 3. Commercial. multi -family, new single-family and other nonresidential construction activities shall be restricted to the hours between seven o"clock (7:00) a.m. and eight o'clock (8:00) p.m., Monday through Friday. Work on Saturdays shall be restricted to the hours between nine o'clock (9:00) a.m. and eight o'clock (8:00) p.m. No work shall he permitted on Sundays. 4. All landscaping shall be irrigated by an approved irrigation system prior to final occupancy permits. Fire: 3 Hydrants should be fully operational before combustible construction is allowed. Both temporary and permanent addressing is to be visible from the public right of way. A hammerhead turnaround should be provided on Tavlor Ave NW, ER Report 08-016.doc CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON BOUNDARY LINE ADJUSTMENT NO. 111A- - - N71r FOM) O%'CRE7r )w WNLWD9 225, U '25.0,T) TRYET BLOCK 50 4 oopl,fi rLgN PAGES J4 LOT 2 0 8ml.* 'jl" A 4 S 4 REWEW WaWAMNT Or"* 's Br \.\.1(.L-�,`., 1,ATl9F'?j)DjTI0ll sT A 2 v6 oltr)fr, 18, MOVAIANr W w C�ff7m I- go, DETAIL OF r X= 6fj CITY TIES li/ Om= 1 zr/D4) CRONES & ASSOC. LAND SURVEYORS Af PORTION OF THE ?L1/4, SECTION _ 7_ TowNsillp _23_ NORTH, RANGE EAST, W.M. 12- Cm6cRt VOLIPAGE 6 GRAPHIC SCALE fN FM ) J-1. - 30 ft. LEGEND 164� FWW MAUMEM AS -WM 0 S"I ITOAR AME1 OAP Ll 2 7 MAW RMR, AS SHOWN %WfrARr SE*rfl "WAXE ROWE)? ME 8 HATER METER fa W7EP NLYE RIW McHr o my (H) JmwAms vUUr oiao ruR Phs sumvry (d) IMYCATEN wEA UREV YYLur (P) k4k34rM AMM PER "r A' WODr OUEN ADD;FWN (R) MaVAMN RECORD PER RCS 1881104 LOT LINE ADJUSTMENT DWNNHOJANV . Y GATE: NO SCAM --T'. r . 30 = I AM E S 1'14th_St. S 1'15th St. a .......... 115th_ Pl. _. St, 3 S St.., IMCP) _-117th S 17th Pl .......... St co ..�118th _ f i19th St i co C A .S 120th-St S W 120th St. S 121st _ St_ 121 st St : 1 S 121st S _ S 122nd St. S 122nd St. .. _.. S 123rd. St S 123rd St NW 7th St f r 1 S 123rd; Pi. m, c� S 124th St: _._ f �dthf � c+ :s —1 cA IMCP) Y ZONING + ± + PAVPW TPCHAiWAL ORVIC88 02/ZW07 - CA F3 - IS T23N RSE W 1J2 —.......-._ Ren4nn Clty Limi#d Sim EXHIBIT 2 March 16, 2008 City of Renton DCED Planning Division q Attention: Rocale Timmons, Assoc. Planner oZO Dear Sir: It seems that the city is slowly but surely letting business and residential people continue to chip away at our small hillside and what little is left of our green belt. We are most concerned about the environment and the current request for a property line adjustment to the 400 Block of Taylor Place NW, Land Use Number LUA08-106, LLA,ECF. We would like to know just who is responsible for the upkeep of the stream/water runoff area. This water comes from under Taylor Ave. and runs under Rainier Ave. Several trees have fallen (due to storms, ratting, etc.), in this green belt and to encroach even further into this area could perhaps cause some flooding problems. It looks like a driveway must be built along the side of the stream as the only entrance to this property. We would like the city to consider an environmental impact study and notify us to who is responsible for this stream. Also there was no date as to when a public hearing would be held. We would like to receive all information on this project. Thank you. Mary 10 Carlson — 215 NW 56 St — Renton, WA 98057 Roberta and Ronnie McDonald — 216 NW 5t' St — Renton, WA 98057C — Mr. and Mrs. Bruce Gregg— 207 NW 5"' St. — Renton, WA 98057 A. G R , KS U--� 5 W �) , al �p �-O+n-rvj Mr. and Mrs. Roland Dewing —210 NW 5t' ST—,.Renton, WA 98057 C o- A gam (The rest of the homes in this location are rentals) EXHIBIT 4 �tisY o CITY F RETON +z Department of Community and * # Economic Development Denis Law, Mayor Alex Pietsch, Administrator April 1, 2008 EXHIBIT 5 Jim Hanson Hanson Consulting 17446 Mallard Cove Lane Mt. Vernon, WA 98274 SUBJECT: Proposed Stream Buffer Averaging Taylor Lot Line Adjustment (LUA08-016, LLA, ECl~) 400 Block of Taylor Place NW Dear Mr. Hanson, This letter is sent in response to your request made as part of the Taylor Lot Line Adjustment (LUA08-016, LLA, ECF), dated February 22, 2008, to average a stream buffer on the project site. ,Summary of Request The applicant proposes to average the stream buffer for a Class 4 stream on the project site from 35 feet to a minimum width of 25 feet on proposed Lot 1, The averaging would allow area for a small single family residence building pad. The total reduction of buffer is 608 square feet and would be replaced at a 1:1 ratio. Stream buffer enhancemcrit is proposed as part of the buffer averaging proposal which will result in the planting of native plants. P,MC 4-4-050.L..5.d allows the Administrator' to approve buffer v, idth averaging f'or Class 4 streams where the buffer width is no less than 25 feet_. provided tlic applicant demonstrates all of the following criteria (pursuant to RMC 4-3-050.1-5.d.111): ifi. Criteria for Approval: Buffer width averaging may be ailowed by the Administrator only where the applicant demonstrates all of the following. - (a) The water body and associated riparian area contains variations in ecological sensitivity or there are existing physical improvements in or near the water body and associated riparian area; and (b) Buffer width averaging will result in no net loss of strearr►ilake;'riparian ecological function; and (e) The total area contained within the buffer after averaging is no less than that contained within the required standard buffer width prior to averaging; and (d) The proposed buffer standard is based on consideration of the best available science as described in WAC 365-195-905; or where there is an absence of valid scientific information, the steps in RMC 4-9-25OF are followed. 1055 South Grady Way - Renton, Washington 98057 This paper contains 50% recycledmateiial, 30% postconsumer RENTON AHEAD OE THE. CURVE Backl4round A stream has been identified on the subject site, which flows west to east along the north border of the project site in a small ravine. The City's Streams and Lakes Map does not classify the stream. The applicant submitted a Stream Evaluation by ,Altmann Oliver Associates, LLC (dated .February 19, 2008) delineating and classifying the str-cam oil the project site as a Class 4 stream. A Class 4 stream is a non-salmonid hearing intermittent stream and requires a minimum 35-foot buffer. The stream was not observed during the dry season, so intermittence could not be confirmed. 1 Class 4 streams require a minimum 35-foot buffer, however the applicant has proposed a reduction of buffer down to 25 feet through buffer averaging on certain portions of the site. The applicant has proposed to increase the buffer on other portions of tlic site so there is iio net loss The reduced buffer would provide for a small building pad on Lot 1 for a single family residence. The applicant indicated that approximately 608 feet of stream buffer would be affected as a result of the proposed averaging. A mitigation plan for the proposed stream buffer impacts was submitted with the project application. The applicant would create an additional 608 square feet of stream buffer as part of the averaging proposal a 1:1 ratio. In addition to the proposal for buffer replacement the applicant is proposing buffer enhancement. Stream buffer enhancement will result in the planting of native plants and the removal of dense Himalayan blackberry and Indian plum. The request for stream buffer averaging was made as part of the application for a Lot Line Adjustment to ad -lust the lot lines for three parcels on a 0.51 acre site into two lots and Fnvironiriental (SEPA) Review for the future development of two single-family residences. The subject property is zoned Residential-8 (R-8), and is located in the 400 block of Talyor Place NW just south of NW 5th Street. The current parcel size is 25,629 square feet and contains 2,545 square feet of critical areas on -site including the Class 4 stream and protected slopes. Analysis per RIV'[C 4-3-050.L.5.d.iii a) The ~eater body and associated riparian area contains variations in ecological sensitivity or there are existing physical improvements in or near the water body and associated riparian area The stream on the property is located within a well defined channel approximately two feet wide at the bottom of the ravine. The upstream portion of the site is culverted under Taylor Place NW and drains through an adjacent parcel before entering the subject property. Runoff within the stream then enters another culvert off -site to the east within the undeveloped right-of-way of Taylor Ave NW. Vegetation within the riparian corridor of the stream is forested and dominated by a canopy of big -leaf maple with an understory of Himalayan blackberry, Indian plum, sword fern, and English ivy. b) Buffer width averaging will result in no net loss of stream/lake/riparian ecological function The proposed buffer reduction area is currently dominated by dense Himalayan blackberry, scattered with hldian Plum. Due to the degraded condition of the proposed buffer replacement area, the applicant proposes to plant a variety of native trees and shrubs to increase the plant species and structural diversity of the buffer. In addition, all invasive urine within the sloped portion of the buffer is proposed to be removed. Implementation of the buffer averaging plan should increase the value of the buffer and would not detrimentally affect the ecological function of the stream. C) The total area contained within the buffer after averaging is no less (han that contained within the required standard buffer width prior to averaging The applicant proposes to reduce the stream buffer by 608 square feet in area. The applicant proposes to replace the stream buffer at a l : l ratio, or with 608 square feet of additional space. In no case would the buffer be reduced below 25 feet. The total area within the buffer after the averaging would he no less than that contained within the required standard buffer prior to averaging d) The proposed buffer standard is based on consideration of the best available science as described in WAC 365-195-905; or where there is an absence of valid scientific information, the steps in RNIC 4-9-250F are followed The C:ity's Streams and Lakes Map does not classify the stream. The applicant submitted a supplemental stream study by Altmann Oliver Associates, LLC (dated February 19, 2008) delineating and classifying the stream on the project site in accordance with standards outlined in RMC 4-8-120.D. Decision: Based on staff s analysis, I have determined the proposed revisions are within the parameters defined by the Renton Municipal Code. ThL:iWorc, the proposed stream buffer averaging is approved subject to the following conditions: 1. The applicant shall be required to submit a stream mitigation plan per RMC 4-8- 120. The mitigation plan shall include a buffer enhancement plan rising native vegetation that enhances or improves the functional attributes of the buffer. A maintenance and monitoring plan for a period no less than five years, shall also be provided in the mitigation plan. The final mitigation plan must be submitted to and approved by the Current Planning Division project manager prior to the issuance of building or construction permits, whichever comes first_ 2. After the approval of the final mitigation plan, a perfonnance surety per RMC 4- 1-230 must be paid to the City of Renton for the maintenance and monitoring period prior to the issuance of building or construction permits, whichever comes fi rs t. Appeal Process: Appeals of this administrative decision must be filed in writing on or before 5:00 p.m. April 15, 2008. Appeals mist he filed in writing, together with the required $75.00 application fee, with: Hearing Examiner; City of Renton, 1055 South Grady Way, Renton, WA 98055. Appeals to the Examiner are govemed by City of Renton Municipal Code Section 4-8-110.B. Additional information regarding the appeal process may be obtained from the Renton City Clerk's Office, (425) 430-6510. Should you have any questions regarding this determination or the requirements discussed in this letter, please contact Rocale Timmons, Associate Planner, at (425) 430-7219. Sincerely, I Neil Watts_ Director Dcvclopment Services Division cc Yellow Jetmifer Henning Rocale Timmons Party of Records Rocale Timmons - RE: Taylor Lot Line Adu,stment, LUA08-016, LLA, ECF, Revised Notice of Application and proposed Page 1 From: "Karen Walter" <Karen.Walter@muckleshoot.nsn.us> EXHIBIT 6 To: "Rocale Timmons" <RTimmons@ci.renton.wa.us> Date: 03/25/2008 3:39:43 PM Subject: RE: Taylor Lot Line Adjustment, LUA08-016, LLA, ECF, Revised Notice of Application and proposed Determination of Non -Significance [Scanned] Ms Timmons: The Muckleshoot Indian Tribe Fisheries Division has reviewed the threshold determination, environmental checklist and the stream study dated February 19 2008 for the above referenced project. Thank you very much for providing this study. Based on our review, there was insufficient information in the study and the checklist to support the stream classification for the onsite portion of unnamed stream indicated as a "Class 4 stream". The stream study report lacks sufficient detail and data to support the Class 4 water typing on the site. The study notes that the stream is approximately 2 feet in width on average and appears to be seasonal and is not mapped per Renton's water typing map. The study lacks details about stream gradient, existence of natural barriers and if any fish were observed during the field visit and what methodology was used. It may be unlikely that fish are using this stream and to our knowledge, it is likely that no one has conducted comprehensive fish surveys of the stream in question. Just the same, the stream lacks fish data, but not necessarily fish. Even though the onsite stream may go dry during some portion of some years, there is some possibility that salmonids use this stream for rearing if they have access to it. A new survey or additional data is needed for this stream to support the water typing as discussed below. As far as the existing culverts are concerned, please note that we do not consider culverts as the basis for determining salmonid-bearing from non-salmonid bearing waters as these culverts can and should be made fish passable as required by the Washington State's Hydraulic Code. Instead, we recommend that physical criteria and a survey of natural fish barriers be collected in instances where fish presence has not been established because accurately establishing fish absence would require comprehensive surveys over multiple water years. The physical criteria for streams we recommend is that used by Washington Department of Natural Resources under WAC 16-222-031 and the Forest Practices Board Manual 13 (http://www,dnr.wa.gov/forestpractices/board/manual/sectionl3.pdf) and King County's Public Rules for 21,A.24 regarding sensitive areas and presumption of salmonid use (http://www.metrokc.gov/ddes/pub_rule/acrobat/21A-24SAFinai.pdf). The data used to develop both of these rules is based on several surveys Rocale Timmons - RE: Taylor Lot Line Adh istment, LUA08-016, LLA, ECF, Revised Nr,ice of Application and proposed ... Page 2 conducted throughout Washington State, primarily in the commercial forest landscape. These physical criteria are similar to that found in Renton's critical areas ordinance (5137) under L1Ciii for unmapped streams. The critical areas report provided the stream width (2 feet on average in width), which meets the minimum 2 feet width standard; however, no other data is provided; therefore, we have insufficient information to determine if the portion of the stream can be used by salmonids. The necessary data to be collected is drainage basin size, stream width, stream gradient and the location of natural barriers at a minimum in the absence of comprehensive fish surveys conducted over multiple water years. If there is no conclusive data, then we would recommend that a new stream survey be conducted to collect physical data and fish data consistent with the recommendations above. In conclusion, if additional data is not collected, then the water typing for the portion of the unnamed stream on site may not be correctly typed for this project, thus the proposed buffers may not sufficiently protect salmon and their habitat. There may also be impacts associated with the stormwater discharge to this stream that are not considered and/or mitigated. Please contact me at 253-876-3116 should you have any questions. Again, thank you for the additional information and the opportunity to review this proposal. Karen Walter Watershed and Land Use Team Leader Muckleshoot Indian Tribe Fisheries Division 39015 172nd Ave SE Auburn WA 98092 -----Original Message ----- From: Rocale Timmons[mailto:RTimmons@ci.renton.wa.us] Sent: Tuesday, March 25, 2008 9:23 AM Rocale Timmons - RE: Taylor Lot Line Ad>l istment, LUA08-016, LLA, ECF Revised Notice of Application and proposed ... Page 3 To: Karen Walter Subject: FW: Taylor Lot Line Adjustment, LUA08-016, LLA, ECF, RevisedNotice of Application and proposed Det [Scanned] Hello Ms. Walter, Thank you for your inquiry. I apologize for the time it has taken me to respond to your email, I have been out of the office on vacation. Attached you will find the stream submitted with the application for the Taylor Lot Line Adjustment (FYI- the pages were scanned backwards). The Environmental Review Committee is scheduled to issue a determination on Monday March 31, 2008. 1 would be happy to accept any comments you have. Feel free to contact me if you have any further questions Rocale Timmons City of Renton Development Services 1055 S. Grady Way Renton, WA 98057 (425) 430-7219 (425) 430-7300 rtimmons@ci.renton.wa.us >>> "Karen Walter" <Karen.Walter@muckleshoot.nsn,us> 03/20/2008 5A4 PM Ms. Timmons, We apologize but we just discovered that the Tribe's Fisheries Division did receive the environmental checklist with the original notice of Rocale Timmons - RE: Taylor Lot Line Adel istment, LUA08-016, LLA, ECF, Revised Notice of Application and proposed ... Page 4 application for the above referenced project. Has the environmental checklist changed since the project was originally noticed on March 10? If not, then we don't need a copy of the checklist. However, we still need a copy of the stream report since it outlines potential project impacts and proposed mitigation-, two items that were not discussed in sufficient detail in the checklist dated February 20 2008. We will also need some time to review this report once we have received it. Thank you for your assistance with this matter. Karen Walter MITFD From: Karen Walter Sent: Thursday, March 20, 2008 3:28 PM To: 'rtimmons@ci.renton.wa.us' Subject: Taylor Lot Line Adjustment, LUA08-018, LLA, ECF, Revised Notice of Application and proposed Determination of Non -Significance Rocale Timmons - RE: Taylor Lot Line Adii istment, LUA08-016, LLA, ECF, Revised Notice of Application and proposed ... Page 5 Ms. Timmons, The Muckleshoot Indian Tribe Fisheries Division just received the notice of application/proposed MDNS for the above referenced project. We did not receive a copy of the environmental checklist for this proposal and should have per WAC 197-11-340 (2)(b). In addition to the environmental checklist, we would appreciate it if we could get a copy of the stream study since recommendations in this document is cited as the basis for the mitigation measures per the notice materials and the details may not be sufficiently discussed in the environmental checklist. Also, we will likely need an extension to the March 24 2008 5 pm comment deadline as we do not have a complete packet to review at this time, Finally, please make the Muckleshoot Indian Tribe Fisheries Division a party of record for this proposal. Please call me if you have any questions at 253-876-3116. Rocale Timmons - RE: Taylor Lot Line Adi, istment, LUA08-016, LLA, ECF, Revised Nntice of Application and proposed ... Page 6 Thank you very much, Karen Walter Watersheds and Land Use Team Leader Muckleshoot Indian Tribe Fisheries Division 39015 172nd Ave SE Auh] trn WA 98092 STATE OF WASHINGTON, COUNTY OF KING } AFFIDAVIT OF PUBLICATION PUBLIC NOTICE Linda M Mills, being first duly sworn on oath that she is the Legal Advertising Representative of the Renton Reporter a bi-weekly newspaper, which newspaper is a legal newspaper of general circulation and is now and has been for more than six months prior to the date of publication hereinafter referred to, published in the English language continuously as a bi-weekly newspaper in Ding County, Washington. The Renton Reporter has been approved as a Legal Newspaper by order of the Superior Court of the State of Washington for King County. The notice in the exact form annexed was published in regular issues of the Renton Reporter (and not in supplement form) which was regularly distributed to its subscribers during the below stated period. The annexed notice, a: Public Notice was published on April 5, 2008. The full amount of the fee charged for said foregoing publication is the sum of S 109.20. Linda M. Mills Legal Advertising Representative, Renton Reporter Subscribed and sworn to me this 7th day of April, 2008. Kathy DalsW, 14otary Public r the State of Washington, Residing in Covingt , Washington P. 0. Number: NOTICE OF ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COMMITTEE RENTON, WASHINGTON The Environmental Review Committee has issued a Determination of Non - Significance -Mitigated for the following project under the authority of the Renton Municipal Code. Taylor Lot Line Ad_justntent LUA08-016, LLA, ECF Location: 400 Blk of Taylor Place NW. The applicant is requesting a Lot Line Adjustment to adjust the lot lines for three parcel, on a 0.51-acre .site into two lots and Environmental (SEPA) Review for the future development of two single-family homes. The subject property is zoned Residential-8 (R-8), and is located in the 400 block of Taylor Place NW just south of NW 5th Street. The current parcel size is 25,629 square feet and contains 2,545 square feet of critical areas on -site including a Class 4 stream and protected slopes. The project proposes to average' the stream buffer on site from 35 feet to a minimum width of 25 feet. Appeals of the env i ronmental determination must be filed in writing on or before 5:00 PM on April 21, 2009. Appeals must he filed in writing together with the required $75.00 application fee with: Hearing Examiner, City of Renton, 1055 South Grady Way, Renton, WA 98057. Appeals to the Examiner are governed by City of Renton Municipal Code Section 4-8-110.13. Additional information regarding the appeal process may he obtained from the Renton City Clerk's Office, (425) 430-6510. Published in the Renton Reporter on April 5, 2008. 964293. C: �y DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY AND C� , ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT ��- M E M O R A N D U M DATE: April 4, 2008 TO: Rocale Timmons, Planner FROM: Mike Dotson, Utility Plan Review`'441 SUBJECT: Taylor Lot Line Adjustment LUA 08-016 We have reviewed the subject Environmental and Development application. The following are comments related to the environmental impacts, policy, and other code - related comments: Existing Conditions: WATER There are existing water mains surrounding and crossing the property. The current Fire flow available to the site is at least 1000 gpm. The proposed project is located within the 300Twater pressure zone. The static water pressure at the site is approximately 77 psi. SEWER The property is currently served by an 8" public sewer line. STORM Surface water conveyance facilities currently are serving this site. STREETS Portions of the site do have improved roadway with curb, gutter, sidewalk and street lighting. There are no code related comments for this Land Use Action. h:ldivision.sldevelop.serldev&plan.inglprojects108-016.rocaieltalor 1la gf.doc City of Renton Department of Community & Economic Development ENVIRONMENTAL & DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: COMMENTS COMMENTS DUE: MARCH 24, 2008 APPLICATION NO: LUA08-016. Li ECF DATE CIRCULATED: MARCH& 2008v1t)N APPLICANT: Jim Hanson PLANNER: Rocale Timmons PROJECT TITLE: Taylor Lot Line Adjustment PLAN REVIEWER: Mike DoMR 1 SITE AREA: 25,269 square feet EXISTING BLDG AREA LOCATION: 400 Block of Taylor Place NW PROPOSED BLDG AREA(gross) N/A WORK ORDER NO: 77872 SUMMARY OF PROPOSAL: The applicant is requesting Environmental (SEPA) Review and a Lot Line Adjustment to adjust the lot lines on a .51 acre site into two lots for the future development of two single-family homes.The subject property is zoned Residential-8 (R-8}, and is located in the 400 block of Tailor Place NW just south of NW 5th street. The current parcel size is 25,629 square feet and contains 2,545 square feet of critical areas on -site including a Category 4 stream and critical slopes. The proposed project would result in impacts to the stream on site and their associated buffer areas. A. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT (e.g. Non -Code) COMMENTS Element of the Environment Probable Minor Impacts Probable Major Impacts More Information Necessary Earth Air Water Plants Land/Shoreline Use Animals Environmental Neagh Energy/ Natural Resources B. POLICY -RELATED COMMENTS C. CODE -RELATED COMMENTS Element of the Environment Probable Minor Impacts Probable Major Impacts More Information Necessary Housing Aesthetics Li ht/Glare Recreation Utilitles Transportation Public Services Historic/Cultural Preservation Airport Environment 10, 000 Feet 14 000 Feet � ✓ ��..,�'-C� /ice-+'-�� -�,�' ``—"' L` � � �� L1 We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas in which we have expertise and have identified areas of probable impact or areas where additional inforrr}atr6i is needed to properly assess this proposal Signature of Direcior or Authorized Representative 3 Date City of Renton Department of Community & Economic Development ENVIRONMENTAL & DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: �r k COMMENTS DUE: MARCH 24, 2008 APPLICATION NO: LUA08-016, LLA, ECF DATE CIRCULATED: MARCH 10, 2008 APPLICANT: Jim Hanson PLANNER: Rocale Timmons PROJECT TITLE: Taylor Lot Line Adjustment (A I r UV REN I UN PLAN REVIEWER: Mike Dotson SITE AREA: 25,269 square feet EXISTING BLDG AREA (gross): NIA LOCATION: 400 Block of Taylor Place NW PROPOSED BLDG ARFA(gross) NIA WORK ORDER NO: 77872 BUILDING DIV1SIQ1v SUMMARY OF PROPOSAL: The applicant is requesting Environmental (SEPA) Review and a Lot Line Adjustment to adjust the lot lines on a .51 acre site into two lots for the future development of two single-family homes.The subject property is zoned Residential-8 (R-8), and is located in the 400 block of Talor Place NW just south of NW 5th street. The current parcel size is 25,629 square feet and contains 2,545 square feet of critical areas on -site including a Category 4 stream and critical slopes. The proposed project would result in impacts to the stream on site and their associated buffer areas. A. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT (e.g. Non -Code) COMMENTS Element of the Environment Probable Minor Impacts Probable Major Impacts More Information Necessary Earth Air Water Plants Land/Shoreline Use Animals Environmental Health Energyr Natural Resources A/o %r s��r «� - QXIJ771Jf ,&/. B. POLICY -RELATED COMMENTS C. CODE -RELATED COMMENTS Element of the Environment Probable Minor Impacts Probable Major Impacts More Information Necessary Housing Aesthetics Light/Glare Recreation Utilities Trans ortation Publie Services Historic/Cullurat Preservation Airport Environment 10,000 Feet 14, 000 Feet 31�,g We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas in which we have expertise and have identified areas of probable impact or areas where additional infpr-rna(on is needed to properly assess this proposal Signature of Director or Authorized Representative Date CITY )F RENTON �- # 'Department of Community and Economic Development Denis Law, Mayor Alex Pietseh, Administrator L April 1, 2008 Jim Hanson Hanson Consulting. 17446 Mallard Cove Lane Mt. Vernon, WA 98274 SUBJECT: Proposed Stream Buffer Averaging Taylor Lot Line Adjustment (LUA08-016, LLA, ECF) 400 Block of Taylor Place NW Dear Mr. Hanson, This letter is sent in response to your request made as part of the Taylor Lot Line . Adjustment (LUA08-016, LLA, ECF), dated February 22, 2008, to average a stream buffer on the project site. Summary of Request The applicant proposes to average the stream buffer for a Class 4 stream on the project site frorn 35 feet to a minimum width of 25 feet on proposed Lot 1. The averaging would allow area for a small single family residence building pad. The total reduction of buffer is 608 square feet and would be replaced at a 1:1 ratio. Stream buffer enhancement is proposed as part of the buffer averaging proposal which will result in the planting of native plants. RMC 4-4-050.L.5,d allows the Administrator t6 approve buffer w idth aN el -aging ror Class 4 streanis where the buffer width is no less than 2.5 feet, provided the applicant demonstrates all of the following criteria (pursuant to RMC 4-3-050.L.5.d.iii): iii. Criteria for Approval: Buffer width averaging may be allowed by the Administrator only where the applicant demonstrates all of the following: (a) The water body and associated riparian area contains variations in ecological sensitivity or there are existing physical improvements in or near the water body and associated riparian area; and (b) Buffer width averaging will result in no net loss of stream/lake/riparian ecological function; and (c) The total area contained within the buffer after averaging is no less than that contained within the required standard buffer width prior to averaging; and (cl) The proposed buffer standard is based on consideration of the best available science as described in WAC 365-195-905; or where there is an absence of valid scientific information, the steps in RMC 4-9-25OF are followed. 1055 South Grady Way - Renton, Washington 98057 R E N T O N A1TEAD OF THE CURVEThis paper contains 54°/ recycled material,34%posteonsvmer Back2round A stream has been identified on the subject site, which flows west to east along the north border of the project site in a small ravine. The City's Streams and Lakes Map does not classi fy the stream. The applicant submitted a Stream Evaluation by Altmann Oliver Associates, LLC (dated February 19, 2008) delineating and classifying the stream on the project site as a Class 4 stream. A Class 4 stream is a non-salmomd bearing intermittent stream and requires a minimum 35-foot buffer. The stream was not observed during the dry season, so intermittence could not be confirmed. 1 Class 4 streams require a minimum 35-foot buffer. however the applicant has proposed a reduction of buffer down to 25 feet through buffer averaging on certain portions of the site. The applicant has proposed to increase the buffer on other portions of the site so there is no net loss. The reduced buffer would provide fora small building pad on Lot l for a single family residence. The applicant indicated that approximately, 608 feet of stream buffer would be affected as a result of the proposed averaging. A mitigation plan for the proposed stream buffer impacts was submitted with the project application. The applicant would create an additional 608 square feet of stream buffer as part of the averaging proposal a 1:1 ratio. In addition to the proposal for buffer replacement the applicant is proposing buffer enhancement. Stream buffer enhancement will result in the planting of native plants and the removal of dense Himalayan blackberry and Indian plum. The request for stream buffer averaging was made as part of the application for a Lot. Line Adjustment to adjust the lot lines for three parcels on a 0.51 acre site into two lots and Environmental (SEPA) Review for the future development of two single-family residences. The subject property is zoned Residential-8 (R-8), and is located in the 400 block of Talyor Place NW just south of NW 5th Street. The current parcel size is 25,629 square feet and contains 2,545 square feet of critical areas on -site including the Class 4 stream and protected slopes. Analysis per RMC 4-3-050.1j.d.iii a) The water body and associated riparian area contains variations in ecological sensitivity or there are existing physical improvements in or near the water body and associated riparian. area The stream on the property is located within a well defined channel approximately two feet wide at the bottom of the ravine. The upstream portion of the site is culverted under Taylor Place NW and drains through an adjacent parcel bcforc entering the subject property. Runoff within the stream then enters another culvert off -site to the east within the undeveloped right-of-way of Taylor .Ave NW, Vegetation within the riparian corridor o f the stream is forested and dominated by a canopy of big -leaf maple with an understory of Himalayan blackberry, Indian plum, sword fern, and English ivy. b) Buffer width averaging will result in no net loss of stream/lake/riparian ecological function The proposed buffer reduction area is currently dominated by dense Himalayan blackberry, scattered with Indian Plum. Due to the degraded condition of the proposed buffer replacement area, the applicant proposes to plant a variety of native trees and shrubs to increase the plant species and structural diversity of the buffer. In addition, all. invasive vine within the sloped portion of the buffer is proposed to be removed. Implementation of the buffer averaging plan should increase the value of the buffer and would not detrimentally affect the. ecological function of the stream. c) The total area contained within the buffer after averaging is no less than that contained within the required standard buffer width prior to averaging The applicant proposes to reduce the stream buffer by 608 square feet in area. The applicant proposes to replace the stream buffer at a 1:1 ratio, or with 608 square feet of additional space. In no case would the buffer be reduced below 25 feet. The total area within the buffer after the averaging would he no less than that contained within the required standard buffer prior to averaging, d) The proposed buffer standard is based on consideration of the best available science as described in WAC 365-195-905; or where there is an absence of valid scientific information, the steps in RMC 4-9-250F are followed The City's Streams and Lakes Map.does not classify the stream. The applicant submitted a supplemental stream study by Altmann Oliver Associates, LLC (dated February 19, 2008) delineating and classifying the stream on the project site in accordance with standards outlined in RMC 4-8-120.D. Decision: Based on staff s analysis, I have determined the proposed revisions are within the parameters defined by the Renton Municipal Code. "l wi-J rre, the proposed stream buffer averaging is approved subjcd to the following conditions: The applicant shall be required to submit a stream mitigation plan per RMC 4-8- 120. The mitigation plan shall include a buffer enhancement plan using native vegetation that enhances or improves the functional attributes of the huffer. A maintenance and monitoring plan for a period no lcss than five years, Shall also be provided in the mitigation plan. The final mitigation plan must be submitted to and approved by the Current Planning Division project manager prior to the issuance of building or construction permits, whichever comes first. After the approval of the final mitigation plan, a performance surety per RMC 4- 1-230 must be paid to the City of Renton for the maintenance and monitoring period prior to the issuance of building or construction permits, whichever comes first. Appeal Process: Appeals of this administrative decision must be filed in writing on or before 5:00 p.m. April 15, 2008. Appeals must be filed in writing, together with the required $75.00 application fee, with: Hearing Examiner, City of Renton, 1055 South Grady Way, Renton, WA 98055. Appeals to the Examiner are governed by City of Renton Municipal Code Section 4-8-110.B. Additional infori-nation regarding the appeal process may be obtained from the Renton City Clerk's Office, (425) 430-6510. Should you have any questions regarding this determination or the requirements discussed in this letter, please contact Rocale Timmons, Associate Planner, at (425) 430-7219. Sincerely, Neil Watts, Director Development Services Division cc: Yellow Jennifer. Henning Rocale Timmons Party of Records ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION ISSUANCE OF A DETERMINATION OF NON -SIGNIFICANCE - MITIGATED (DNS-M) PCSTED TO NOTIFY INTERESTED PERSONS OF AN ENVIRONMENTAL ACTION PROJECT NAME: Taylor Lot Line Adjustment PROJECT NUMBER: LUA08-016, LLA, ECF LCCATION: 400 Biock of Taylor Ave NW OE SC RIPTION: The applicant is requesting a Lot Line Adjustment to adjust the lot lines for three parcels on a 0.51-acre sde into two lots and Environmental (SEPAj Review for the tuWre development of two single- family homes. The subject property is zoned Residential-8 IR-8), and is located in the 400 block of Taylor Place NW just south of NW 5th Street. The current parcel size is 25,622 square feet and contains 2,545 square feet of critical areas on -site including a Class 4 stream and protected slopesThe project proposes to average the stream buffer on site from 35 feet to a minimum width of 25 feet - THE CI I OF RENI ON ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COMMITTEE {ERC) HAS DETERNIJNED THAT THE PROPOSED ACTION DOES NOT HAVE A SIGNIFICANT ADVERSE IMPACT ON THE ENVIRONMENT. Appeals of the environmental determination must be filed in writing on or before 5:00 PM on April 21, 2008, Appeals must he filed in writing together with the required S75.00 application fee with: Hearing Examiner, City of Renton, 1055 South Grady Way, Renton, WA 98057. Appeals to the Examiner are governed by City of Renton Municipal Code Section 4-e-110-0. Additional information regarding the appeal process may be obtained from the Renton City Clerk's Office, (425) 430-6510. IF THE ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION IS APPEALED, A PUBLIC HEARING WILL BE SET AND ALL PARTIES NOTIFIED. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION, PLEASE CONTACT THE CITY OF RENTON, DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY & ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT AT (425) 430-7200 DO NOT REMOVE THIS NOTICE WITHOUT PROPER AUTHORIZATION Please iWude the 'project NUTABEft when calling fovIaroper file ltientifsatlon. CERTIFICATION A(,'X VD , hereby certify that 2^ copies of the above document were posted by me in conspicuous places or nearby the described property on�RY�i JJll 4 1~\} DATE: �J I f LI SIGNED:.Ufa �t.t .� ATTEST: Subscribed and sworn before me, a Notary Public, in and for the State of Washington residing i# U'�'., sir E2 —tL., on the ! day of NOTARY PUBL C SIGN �'+++ai��*'r ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION ISSUANCE OF A DETERMINATION OF NON -SIGNIFICANCE - MITIGATED (DNS-M) POSTED TO NOTIFY INTERESTED PERSONS OF AN ENVIRONMENTAL ACTION PROJECT NAME: Taylor Lot Line Adjustment PROJECT NUMBER: LUA08-016, LLA, ECF LOCATION: 400 Block of Taylor Ave NW DESCRIPTION: The applicant is requesting a Lot Line Adjustment to adjust the lot lines for three parcels on a 0.51-acre site into two lots and Environmental (SEPA) Review for the future development of two single- family homes. The subject property is zoned Residential-8 (R-8), and is located in the 400 block of Taylor Place NW just south of NW 5th Street. The current parcel size is 25,629 square feet and contains 2,545 square feet of critical areas on -site including a Class 4 stream and protected slopes. The project proposes to average the stream buffer on site from 35 feet to a minimum width of 25 feet. THE CITY OF RENTON ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COMMITTEE (ERC) HAS DETERMINED THAT THE PROPOSED ACTION DOES NOT HAVE A SIGNIFICANT ADVERSE IMPACT ON THE ENVIRONMENT. Appeals of the environmental determination must be filed in writing on or before 5:00 PM on April 21, 2008. Appeals must be filed in writing together with the required $75.00 application fee with: Hearing Examiner, City of Renton, 1055 South Grady Way, Renton, WA 98057. Appeals to the Examiner are governed by City of Renton Municipal Code Section 4-8-110.B. Additional information regarding the appeal process may be obtained from the Renton City Clerk's Office, (425) 430-6510. IF THE ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION IS APPEALED, A PUBLIC HEARING WILL BE SET AND ALL PARTIES NOTIFIED. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION, PLEASE CONTACT THE CITY OF RENTON, DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY & ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT AT (425) 430-7200. DO NOT REMOVE THIS NOTICE WITHOUT PROPER AUTHORIZATION Please include the project NUMBER when calling for proper file identification. CITY F RENTON � _ n Denis Law, Mayor April 3, 2008 Jim Hanson Hanson Consulting. 17446 Mallard Cove Lane Mt Vernon, WA 98274 SUBJECT: Taylor Lot Line Adjustment LUA08-016, LLA, ECF. Dear Mr. Hanson: Department of Community and Economic Development Alex Pietsch, Administrator This letter is written on behalf of the Environmental Review Committee (ERC) to advise you that they have completed their review of the subject project and have issued a threshold Determination of Non -Significance -Mitigated with Mitigation Measures. Please refer to the enclosed ERC Report and Decision, Part 2, Section.B for a list of the Mitigation Measures. Appeals of the environmental determination must be Bled in writing on or before 5:00 PM on April 21, 2008. Appeals must be filed in writing together with the required $7.5.00 application fee with: Hearing Examiner, City of Renton, 1055 South Grady Way, Renton, WA 98057. Appeals to the Examiner are governed by City of Renton Municipal Code Section 4-8- 110.13. Additional information regarding the appeal process may be obtained from the Renton City Clerk's Office, (425) 430-6510. If the Environmental Determination is appealed, a public hearing date will be set and all parties notified. The preceding information will assist you in planning for implementation of your project and enable you to exercise your.appeal rights more fully, if you choose to do so. if you have any questions or desire clarification of the above, please call me at (425) 430-7219. For the Environmental Review Committee, Ro ale Timmons Associate Planner Enclosure cc: Robert Rively, Mary Jo Carlson, Roberta & Ronnie McDonald, Bruce & Sue Gregg, Roland & Deioris Dewing, Karen Walter / Party(ies) of Record 1055 South Grady Way Renton, Washington 98057 - This paper contains50% recycled material, 30%postbansumer RENTON AHEAD OF THE CURVE Y *_n't-CITY1FRENTUN +♦Department of Community and Economic Development DenisLaw,Mayor Alex Pietsch, Administrator April 3, 2008 Washington State Department of Ecology Environmental Review Section PO Box 47703 Olympia, WA 98504-7703 Subject: Environmental Determination Transmitted herewith is a copy of the Environmental Determination for the following project reviewed by the Environmental Review Committee (ERC) on March 31, 2008_ DETERMINATION OF NON -SIGNIFICANCE -MITIGATED PROJECT NAME: Taylor Lot Line Adjustment PROJECT NUMBER: LUA08-016, LLA, ECF LOCATION: 400 BIock of Taylor Avenue NW DESCRIPTION: The applicant is requesting a Lot Line Adjustment to adjust the lot lines for three parcels on a 0.51-acre site into two lots and Environmental (SEPA) Review for the future development of two single-family homes. The subject property is zoned Residential-8 (R-8), and is located in the 400 block of Taylor Place NW just south of NW 5th Street. The current parcel size is 25,629 square feet and contains 2,545 square feet of critical areas on -site including a Class 4 stream and protected slopes. The project proposes to average the stream buffer on site from 35 feet to a minimum width of 25 feet. Appeals of the environmental determination must be filed in writing on or before 5:00 PM on April 21, 2008. Appeals must be filed in writing together with the required $75.00 application fee with: Hearing Examiner, City of. Renton, 1055 South Grady Way, Renton, WA 98057. Appeals .to the Examiner are governed by City of Renton Municipal Code Section 4-8-11OR Additional information regarding the appeal process may be obtained from the Renton City Clerk's Office, (425) 430-6510. If you have questions, please call me at (425) 430-7219. For the Environmental Review Conurittee, Ro ale Timmons Associate Planner Enclosure cc: King County Wastewater Treatment Division WDFW, Stewart Reinhold David F. Dietzman, Department of Natural Resources WSDOT, Northwest Region Duwamish Tribal Office Karen Walter, Fisheries, Muckleshoot Indian Tribe 1055 South Grady Way - Renton, Washington 08057 This paper contains50% recycledmaterial,3DY, post consumer RENTON AHEAD of THE CURVE CITY OF RENTON DETERMINATION OF NOWSIGNIFICANCE-MITIGATED MITIGATION MEASURES APPLICATION NO(S): LUA08-016, LLA, ECF APPLICANT: Hanson Consulting; Jim Hanson PROJECT NAME: Taylor Lot Line Adjustment DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSAL: The applicant is requesting a Lot Line Adjustment to adjust the lot lines for three parcels on a 0.51-acre site into two lots and Environmental (SEPA) Review for the future development of two single-family homes. The subject property is zoned Residential-8 (R-8), and is located in the 400 block of Taylor Place NW just south of NW 5th Street. The current parcel size is 25,629 square feet and contains 2,545 square feet of critical areas on -site including a Class 4 stream and protected slopes. The project proposes to average the stream buffer on site from 35 feet to a minimum width of 25 feet. LOCATION OF PROPOSAL LEAD AGENCY: MITIGATION MEASURES: 400 Block of Taylor Ave NW The City of Renton Department of Community & Economic Development Planning Division 1. The applicant will be required to submit a Temporary Erosion and Sedimentation. Control Plan (TESCP) designed pursuant to the State Department of Ecology's Erosion and Sediment Control Requirements, outlined in Volume 11 of the 2001 Stormwater Management Manual. The plan must be submitted to and approved by the Current Planning Division project manager prior to issuance of the utility construction and building permits. 2. The applicant will be required to comply with the recommendations found in the geotechnical report prepared by Bergquist Engineering Services prior to issuance of building permits. 3. A covenant shall be placed on the face of the Taylor Lot Line Adjustment stating there be a 10-foot buffer between the edge of the footing for a new single family residence and the face of the steep slope on Lot 2. 4. A Native Growth Protection Easement shall be placed over that part of the site encompassing the stream and buffer area, where not covered by the house, walkway, or driveway. Restrictive covenants shall also be placed on the lot to this affect. The easement and restrictive covenants shall be recorded prior to issuance of building permits. ERG Mitigation Measures Page 1 of 1 CITY OF RENTON DETERMINATION OF NON -SIGNIFICANCE -MITIGATED ADVISORY NOTES APPLICATION NO(S): LUA08-016, LLA, ECF APPLICANT: Hanson Consulting; Jim Hanson PROJECT NAME: Taylor Lot Line Adjustment DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSAL: The applicant is requesting a Lot Line Adjustment to adjust the lot lines for three parcels on a 0.51-acre site into two lots and Environmental (SEPA) Review for the future development of two single-family homes. The subject property is zoned Residential-8 (R-8), and is located in the 400 block of Taylor Place NW just south of NW 5th Street. The current parcel size is 25,629 square feet and contains 2,545 square feet of critical areas on -site including a Class 4 stream and protected slopes. The project proposes to average the stream buffer on site from 35 feet to a minimum width of 25 feet. LOCATION OF PROPOSAL: 400 Block of Taylor Ave NW LEAD AGENCY: The City of Renton Department of Community & Economic Development Planning. Division Advisory Notes to Applicant: The following notes are supplemental information provided in conjunction with the environmental determination. Because these notes are provided as information only, they are not subject to the appeal process for environmental determinations. Planning: 1 _ RMC section 4-4-030.C.2 limits haul hours between 8:30 am to 3:30 pm; Monday through Friday unless otherwise approved by the Development Services Division. The Development Services Division reserves the right to rescind the approved extended haul hours at. anytime if complaints are received. 2. Within thirty (30) days of completion of grading work, the applicant shall hydroseed or plant an appropriate ground cover over any portion of the site that is graded or cleared of vegetation and where no further construction work will occur within ninety (90) days. Alternative measures such as mulch, sodding, or plastic covering as specified in the current King County Surface Water Management Design Manual as adopted by the City of Renton may be proposed between the dates of November 1 st and March 31 st of each year. The Development Services Division's approval of this work is required prior to. final inspection and approval of the permit. 3. Commercial, multi -family, new single-family and other nonresidential construction activities shall be .restricted to the hours between seven o'clock (7:00) a.m. and eight o'clock (8:00) p.m., Monday through Friday. Work on Saturdays shall be restricted to the hours between nine o'clock (9:00) a.m. and eight o'clock (8:00.) p.m. No work shall be permitted on Sundays. 4. All landscaping shall be irrigated by an approved irrigation system prior to final occupancy permits. Fire: 1. Hydrants should be fully operational before combustible construction is allowed_ 2. Both temporary and permanent addressing is to be visible from the public right of way. 3. A hammerhead turnaround should be provided on Taylor Ave NW.. ERC Advisory !Votes Page 1 d 1 CITY OF RENTON DETERMINATION OF NON -SIGNIFICANCE (MITIGATED) APPLICATION NO(S): LUA08-016, LLA, ECF APPLICANT: Hanson Consulting-, Jim Hanson PROJECT NAME: Taylor Lot Line Adjustment DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSAL: The applicant is requesting a Lot Line Adjustment to adjust the lot lines for three parcels on a 0.51-acre site into two lots and Environmental (SEPA) Review for the future development of two single-family homes. The subject property is zoned Residential-8 (R-8), and is located in the 400 block of Taylor Place NW just south of NW 5th Street. The current parcel size is 25,629 square feet and contains 2,545 square feet of critical areas on -site including a Class 4 stream and protected slopes. The project proposes to average the stream buffer on site from 35 feet to a minimum width of 25 feet. LOCATION OF PROPOSAL: 400 Block of Taylor Avenue NW LEAD AGENCY: The City of Renton Department of Community & Economic Development Planning Division The City of Renton Environmental Review Committee has determined that it does not have a probable significant adverse impact on the environment. An Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) is not required under RCW 4321C.030(2)(c). Conditions were imposed as mitigation measures by the Environmental Review Committee under their authority of Section 4-6-6 Renton Municipal Code. These conditions are necessary to mitigate environmental impacts identified during the environmental review process. Appeals of the environmental determination must be filed in writing on or before 5:00 PM on April 21, 2008. Appeals must be filed in writing together with the required $75.00 application fee with: Hearing Examiner, City of Renton, 1055 South Grady Way, Renton, WA 98057. Appeals to the Examiner are governed by City of Renton Municipal Code Section 4-8-110.B. Additional information regarding the appeal process may be obtained from the Renton City Clerk's Office. (425) 430-6510. PUBLICATION DATE: April 5, 2008 DATE OF DECISION: March 31, 2008 SIGNATURES: Gregg Zimmerman, Administrator Date ADavidaniels, Fire Chief Date Public Works ireepartment kVUa16V_____\ Terry Higashiyama, Administrator Date ie Pietsch, Ad inistrator Date Community Services Department of Community & Economic Development ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COMMITTEE MEETING NOTICE March 31, 2008 To: Gregg Zimmerman, Public Works Administrator Terry Higashiyama, Community Services Administrator I. David Daniels, Fire Chief Alex Pietsch, CED Administrator From: Jennifer Henning, CED Planning Manager Meeting Date: Monday, March 31, 2008 Time: 3:00 PM Location: Sixth Floor Conference Room #620 Agenda listed below. Ram Short Plat Timmons LUA07-140, SHPL-H, ECF Application for Environmental Review for a 6-lot short plat in the R-8 zone. This project is also subject to short plat review by the Hearing Examiner. The underlying parcel is 44,503 SF and proposed density would be 7.48 dulacre_ The existing single-family home would be demolished. Street improvements would be required along Queen Ave. N_ and NE 6th St. and 9,581 SF would be dedicated for public right-of-way_ There are 29 significant trees onsite, of which the applicant proposes to retain none. There are no critical areas onsite. Key Plaza — Renton Highlands (Wasser) LUA08-013, SA -A, ECF The applicant is requesting Administrative Site Plan Review and Environmental (SEPA) Review for a proposed commercial development in the Commercial Arterial (CA) Zone. The proposed project consists of two commercial buildings with a combined floor area of 17,187 square feet on a 1.4 acre site. Seventy parking stalls are proposed to accommodate the proposed commercial uses. Taylor Lot Line Adjustment (CONSENT ITEM) (Timmons) LUA08-016, LLA, ECF The applicant is requesting a Lot Line Adjustment to adjust the lot lines for three parcels on a 0.51 acre site into two lots and Environmental (SEPA) Review for the future development of two single-family homes. The subject property is zoned Residential-8 (R-8), and is located in the 400 block of Talyor Place NW just south of NW 5th street. The current parcel size is 25,629 square feet and contains 2,545 square feet of critical areas on -site including a Class 4 stream and protected slopes. The project proposes to average the stream buffer on site to a minimum width of 25 feet. Boeing Hangar D Apron Bldq (CONSENT ITEM) _ (Dolbeej LUA08-022, ECF The applicant is requesting a 23,400 sq. ft. fabric -covered aircraft hanger building, on a 204.17-acre parcel, in the Urban Center North 2 zone, at 737 Logan Ave N. The City of Renton and The Boeing Co. entered into a development agreement that vested this site to land use regulations for ongoing Renton Plant operations and potential redevelopment, as such this project will be reviewed under Heavy Industrial (HI) zoning from 2002. The hanger is being placed over existing concrete pavement. The site is accessed by N 6th Ave. The subject parcel is adjacent to the Cedar River and Lake Washington. The subject location is 280 feet from the ordinary high water mark of the Cedar River and is approximately 3,900 feet from Lake Washington; therefore no studies were required. cc: D. Law, Mayor J. Covington, Chief Administrative Officer S. Dale Estey. CED Director U D. Pargas, Assistant Fire Marshall N. Watts, Development Services Director 7 F. Kaufman, Hearing Examiner C. Duffy, Deputy Chief/Fire Marshal J. Medzegian, Council P. Hahn, Transportation Systems Director R. Lind, CED Planning Manager L. Warren, City Attorney ERC City of Renton REPORT Department of Community and Economic Development ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COMMITTEE REPORT ERC MEETING DATE: March 31, 2008 Project Name: Taylor Lot Line Adjustment Owner, C. Hanson LLC; 17446 Mallard Cove Lane; Mt. Vernon, WA 98274 Applicant: Hanson Consulting; Jim Hanson; 17446 Mallard Cove Lane; Mt. Vernon, WA 98274 Contact: Hanson. Consulting; Jim 1 lanson; 17446 Mallard Cove Lane: Mt. Vernon, WA 98274 File Nurnher: LUA08-016, LLA, ECF Project iWanager: Rocale Timmons, Associate Planner Project Surnmary: The applicant is requesting a Lot Line Adjustment to adjust the lot lines for three parcels on a 0.51-acre site into two lots and Environmental (SFPA) Review for the future development of two single-family homes. The subject property is zoned Residential-8 (R-8), and is located in the 400 block of Taylor Place NW just south of NW 5th Street. The current parcel size is 25,629 square feet and contains 2,545 square feet of critical areas on -site including a Class 4 stream a.ud protected slopes. The project proposes to average the stream buffer on site from 35 feet to a minimum width of 25 feet. Project Location: 400 Block of Taylor Ave NW Exist, Bldg. Area SF: NIA Proposed New Bldg. Area (footprint): NIA Proposed Ncvt: Bldg. Area (gross): 4,500 sf Site Area: 25,629 sf Total Building Area GSF: 4,500 sf STAFF Staff Recommends that the Environmental Review Committee issue a RECOMMENDATION: Determination of Non -Significance - Mitigated (DNS-M). Project Location Map ERC Report 08-016-loc City of Renton DCED Division — CZ l Planning Department Enr,- zmcntcrl Review Committee Report TAYLOR LOT LINE ADJUSTMENT LUA08-016, LLA, ECF Report of March 31, 2008 �^ Pate 2 of 5 PART ONE: PROJECT DESCRIPTION / BACKGROUND The applicant, Jim ilanson, is requesting Environmental (SEPA) Review for the future construction oftwo single-family residences. In addition to the Environmental Review a Lot Line Adjustment has been requested. The vacant 0.51 acre site consists of three existing legal lots which would be consolidated into two lots with the proposed lot line adjustment. The site contains protected slopes and a Class 4 stream and 35-foot wide associated buffers. The site is undeveloped and is vegetated with a mix of deciduous trees and brush_ 'The subject property is zoned Residential-8 (R-8), and is located in the 400 block of Talyor Place NWjust south of NW 5th Street. Lot I would be approximately 9,360 square feet in size and I,ot 2 would be about 12,855 square feet following the lot line adjustment. Access to Lot 1 will be gained from Taylor Place NW. Proposed access to I,ot 2 would be gained from an extension of unimproved Taylor Avenue NW. Eventual project construction would require grading and excavation activities throughout the site for the installation of new building pads and utilities. A Class 4 stream has been identified and delineated on the project site. A Class 4 stream is a non-salmonid bearing intermittent stream and requires a minimum 35-foot buffer. The proposed project would reduce the 35-foot buffer to no less than 25 feet on Lot 1 to allow for a single family residence building pad_ The total reduction of buffer is {SOS square feet and will be replaced at a 1: l ratio. Stream buffer enhancement is proposed as part of the buffer averaging which will result in the planting of native plants. Staff received comments from neighboring property owners regarding drainage concerns (Exhibit 4). PART TWO: ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW In compliance with RCW 43.21C,240, the following enviroYrrnental (SEPA) review addresses only those project impacts that arc not adequately addressed under existing development standards and environmental regulations. A. Environmental Threshold Recommendation Based on analysis of probable impacts from the proposal, staff recommends that the Responsible Officials: Issue a DNS-M with a 14-dad' Appeal Period. B. Mitigation Measures I. The applicant will be required to submit a Temporary Erosion and Sedimentation Control Plan (TESCP) designed pursuant to the State Department of Ecology's Erosion and Sediment Control Requirements, outlined in Volume 11 of the 2001 Stormwater Management Manual. The plan must be submitted to and approved by the Current Planning Division project manager prior to issuance of the utility construction and building permits. 2. The applicant will be required to comply with the recommendations found in the geotechnical report prepared by Bergquist Engineering Services prior to issuance of building permits. 3. A covenant shall be placed on the Face of the Taylor Lot Line Adjustment stating there be a 10-foot buffer between the edge of the footing for a new single family residence and the face of the steep slope on Lot 2. 4. A Native Growth Protection Easement shall be placed over that part of the site encompassing the stream and buffer area, where not covered by the house, walkway, or driveway. Restrictive covenants shall also be placed on the lot to this affect. The casement and restrictive covenants shall be recorded prior to issuance of building permits. FRC Report 08-016.doc City of Renton DCED Division — Ct .t Planning Department Ent zmental Review Committee Report TAYLOR LOT LINE ADJUSTMENT L UA08-OI6, LLA, ECF Report of March 31, 2009 Page 3 of 5 C. Exhibits Exhibit 1 Lot Line Adjustment Plan Exhibit 2 Zoning Map Exhibit 3 Aerial Photograph Exhibit 4 Letter from Neighboring Property Owners Exhibit 5 Stream Buffer Averaging Approval D. Environmental Impacts The Proposal was circulated and reviewed by various City Departments and Divisions to determine whether the applicant has adequately identified and addressed environmental impacts anticipated to occur in conjunction with the proposed development. Stall"reviera%ers haA c identified thtit the proposal is likely° to have the following probable impacts: 1. Earth Impacts: The property consists of a terrace that slopes to the east with grades of 15 to 20 percent. On the northeastern portions of the site are two relatively steep areas sloping at gradients more than 40 percent (protected slopes), which are south of the stream on site. The site is covered with a thin layer of topsoil consisting of loss sandy silt. Underlying the topsoil there are intermittent layers of coarse grained soils including sand, gravel -sand, and sand -silt. The site is undeveloped and is vegetated with a mix of deciduous trees and brush. The applicant submitted a Geotechnical Engineering Study from Bergquist Engineering Services (dated May 31, 2007). The report states that development of a new single-family house could be supported on conventional spread footing foundations. The report also recommends that there be a 10-foot buffer between the edge of the footing and the face of the steep slope on proposed Lot 2. The applicant's SEPA checklist indicates that earthwork activities associated with building single family residences will occur in Girder to create the appropriate grades for the installation ol'building pads and utilities. The most common form of instability on this slope would be related to erosion, and due to the relatively loose condition of existing, near surface soils and the granular nature of the material, erosion from surface water would be expected across much of the slopes area of the property. As a condition of approval the applicant will be required to submit a Temporary Erosion and Sedimentation Control Plan (TESCP) designed pursuant to the State Department of Ecology's Erosion and Sediment Control Requirements, outlined in Volume 11 of the 2001 Stormwater Management Manual. The report also provided recommendations for slope stability, foundations, building floor support, fill soil considerations, site preparation and grading, underground utilities, building drains, exterior slabs, asphaltic pavements, structural fill, and seismic considerations. In order to limit impacts to the project site and neighboring properties that could occur during project construction, staff recommends as a mitigation measure that project construction comply with the reconunendations found in the geotechnical report prepared by Bergquist Engineering Services. In particular, the recommended 10-foot buffer between the edge of the footing and the face of the steep slope should be recorded on the face of the lot line adjustment for proposed Lot 2. Mitigation Measures: 1. The applicant will be required to submit a Temporary Erosion and Sedimentation Control Plan (TESCP) designed pursuant to the State Department of Ecology's Erosion and Sediment Control Requirements, outlined in Volume 11 of the 2001 Stormwater Management Manual. The plan rriust be submitted to and approved by the Current Planning Division project manager prior to issuance of the utility construction and building permits and during construction. 2. The applicant will be required to comply with the recommendations found in the geotechnical report prepared by Bergquist Engineering Services prior to issuance of building permits. ERC Report 0-016.doc City of Renton DCED Division — C t Planning Department En imental Review Committee Report TAYLOR LOT LINEADJUSTMENT LUA08-016, LLA, ECF Report of March 31, 2008 Page 4 of 5 3. A covenant shall be placed on the face of the Taylor Lot lane Adjustment stating there be a 10-foot buffer between the edge of the footing for a new single family residence and the face of the steep slope on Lot 2 prior to the recording of the Lot Line Adjustment. Nexus: SEPA Environmental Regulations 2. Water a. Wetland, Streams, Lakes Impacts: A stream has been identified, which flows west to east along the north border of the project site in a small ravine. The City"s Streams and Lakes Map does not classify the stream. The applicant submitted a Stream Evaluation by Altmann Oliver Associates, LLC (dated February 19, 2008) delineating and classifying the stream on the project site as a Class 4 stream. A Class 4 stream is a non-salmonid bearing intennittent stream and requires a minimum 35-foot buffer. The stream was not observed during the dry season, so intermittence could not be confznned. Class 4 streams require a minimum 35-foot buffer, however the applicant has proposed a reduced buffer down to 25 feet through buffer averaging. The applicant has proposed to increase the buffer on certain portions of the site so there is no net loss. The reduced buffer would allow a small building pad on Lot 1 for a single family residence. The applicant indicated in the SEPA Checklist that approximately 608 feet of stream buffer would be affected as a result of the proposed averaging. The applicant would create an additional 608 square feet of stream buffer as part of the averaging proposal along with buffer enhancement. Stream buffer enhancement will result in the planting of native plants and the removal of dense Himalayan blackberry and Indian plum. A mitigation plan for the proposed stream buffer impacts was submitted with the project applieation. The applicant will be required to comply with RMC 4-3-050 Critical Areas regulations to mitigate for any impacts permitted to the stream and its buffer. Staff will he recommending approval of the buffer averaging proposal subject to conditions. The decision for the buffer averaging proposal will be issued under a separate cover. Mitigation Measures: A Native Growth Protection Fasernent shall be placed over that part of the site encompassing the stream and buffer area, where not covered by the house, walkway, or driveway. Restrictive covenants shall also be placed on the lot to this effect. The easement and restrictive covenants shall be recorded prior to issuance of'building permits. Nexus: RMC 4-3-150.L.7 Critical Areas Regulations E. Comments of Reviewing Departments The proposal has been circulated to City Department and Division Reviewers. Where applicable, their comments have been incorporated into the text of this report and/or "Advisory Notes to Applicant." ✓ Copies of all Review Comments are contained in the Official File and may be attached to this report. Environmental Determination Appeal Process Appeals of the environmental determination must be filed in writing on or before 5:00 PM, April 21, 2008. Renton Municipal Code Section 4-8-1 10.13 governs appeals to the Hearing Examiner. Appeals must be filed in writing at the City Clerk's office along with a $75.00 applieation fee. Additional information regarding the appeal process may be obtained from the City Clerk's Office, Renton City Hall - 7th Floor, 1055 S. Grady Way, Renton WA 98057. F.RC Report 08-016.doc- City of Renton DC'ED Division — C i Planning Departmeni En nmental Review Committee Report TAYLOR LOT LINE AD.ILSTMEAY L UA08-016, LLA, ECF Report of March 31, 2008 T Page 5 of 5� ADVISORY NOTES TO APPLICANT The following notes are supplemental information provided in conjunction with the administrative land use action. Recause these notes tire provided as information only, they are not subject to the appeal process.for the land use actions. Planning._ 3 4, Fire: RMC section 4-4-030.C2 limits haul hours between 8:30 am to 3:30 pm, Monday through Friday unless otherwise approved by the Development Services Division. The Development Services Division reserves the right to rescind the approved extended haul hours at any time if complaints are received. Within thirty (30) days of completion of grading work, the applicant shall hydroseed or plant an appropriate ground cover over any portion of the site that is graded or cleared of vegetation and where no further construction work will occur within ninety (90) days. Alternative measures such as mulch, sodding, or plastic covering as specified in the current King County Surface Water Management Design Manual as adopted by the City of Renton may be proposed between the dates of November 1st and March 31st of each year. The Development Services Division's approval of this work is required prior to final inspection and approval of the. permit. Commercial, multi -family, new single-family and other nonresidential construction activities shall be restricted to the hours between seven o'clock (7:00) a.m. and eight o'clock (&00) p.m., Monday through Friday. Work on Saturdays shall be restricted to the hours between nine o'clock (9:00) a.m. and eight o'clock (8:00) p.m. No work shall be pennitted on Sundays. All landscaping shall be irrigated by an approved irrigation system prior to final occupancy permits. 1. Hydrants should be fully operational before combustible construction is allowed. 2. Both temporary and permanent addressing is to be visible from the public right of way. 3. A hammerhead turnaround should be provided on Taylor Ave NW. ERC Rcporl 08-016.doc CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON vOLJPAGE BOUNDARY LINE ADJUSTMENT NO. LUA- LN D-_- _ Nra'12'A E I�WU-4-1 fDUYo LVNwE7E I ,e e' A"PLE \ 1 F rill 2ss oav lR1 7 EEa' MAPLEII STFT r / WnP E BLOCK Afr 2 � �5 e a• Mawte r� � � u ♦ ` � a re- W+rpxE \ \\ ) r2• AMAPLE fa' MAPLE $A I\V� \ I Ja re• M6wtE 1 \ \ C� \ � ` i M ra• �+wtie \ \ \\\ 9 e-MAPLE \ \ r0 r2- AMAPL.-LE \\\1 � � ppITI©N \ ' s-.uwLE GLEN GES 9�-92 ,2 10• MAAPLE WOOp NE 47, PA 9j?a 10,2a . e \ \ \ •j9p6 - r6 sa- MAPLE f7 r2-AiWLE �.•.{{{jjjj of To ?2' MAPLE GRAPHIC SCALE 2r r2•"4PJE o q di p \ '�� , � i , r � ! $ �-[d" - ( y" ,"�-' •, JI as ,a• wPo.F \ ` 9TV: \a! ...'1 l Y2 i r ' • 1 ' ` ` `' 7 - r4 l ` Ypb, !jl 24 7a" YWLE A ]r s5?:"am - \ '(��{' jr`�1 _ �� w zs rs' u+oLE IN FLP; f 27 ?a `•'fd- "►�1 2e 1117—RE 7 0. E S 27 rY• UAPLE LOT 2 {I LOT i 2 77,2935 9F 1 sa rd uwr a (a) \ ZRGEND- .-.-".. 1 \ d l,t., , .. , A2•-- �,� fLYmrn ArL1vLUlvr7, As SJiaMH \ \ ' i :: ^Ci- � � -� -, � • SET REBAA AND GP 24 2952E \ \ • 9 \ ;�1 '. r• --.�� Q s'GCe'.7P RESAR AS SHOW SEMfA YA/tlOLE Pu'YE 0 WATER 4E7ER roumoE � %KwwWDRY \\ \\ � /3 2 W e � P Aa¢.eDx N; eei9ae�9 f _ M R! E. wff 447 w' RRAiT LM"MAYMs,rEv r 1/G+1 \` \� „d1 r ' HLOGK �{Ij r •. I 2za.Gr�n � r�c,rFs VALUEHELL) uE uRt DTIKE AGESTREET ION T rW 5VOLUME to, rf_!➢J ANVCAs AECOM PER PtA7 OF Y aLEM ADDI.ApN faLWo CD4CJPElE Nla'2pio9� (R) M VCA7ES RECDi7G PER RDS rdd/r0s Ar0.4uwrml rN— 1- (frSr7ED rr/G*) � �� \ \l M1 �� `1 ",-•�I :,., � T da 9rAld � ry � FOuvO GLYrCRE7F AeONLGrENr \` 1� DETAIL OF 2�� CITY TIES f. J9.2 D "J \ \\ CRONES ASSOC, LOT LINE ADJUSTMENT \ U A LAND SURVEYORS 'y Drw. ar DATE d(3 NO \ �� JANUARY. ?OOB MAyGiO-p+A�lf[ipwAki 9�aL.OMi 2]eoe rwn� AK. sr. kEwr, .a veo.a !us) ..0 THAT PORTION OF THE _S�_1f4. SW_1/4, SECTION ? TOWNSHIP _83_ NORTH, RANGE _ 5 _ EAST. W.M. 7-' @ sc"E- S e7FT.' _-... DATE f.RA 1- - �' 2 OF 2 ..... 113th..St; S ..114th St. _.. S 115th St. r �- S ...1.15th _ Pl.co CQ S i - _S 116th St. y' S 117th St.. IMCP) 117th PI. S.. 118th St. C ❑ _ S -' l9th SL co CA S.120th St 5. _ 120th St. S _ 121st fit_ . S 121st St '. S 121st S .S 122nd St S 122nd St. z S 123rd St S 123rd St. NW 7th St. R— R-e S 123rd P1 S 123rd' P1, S 124th St S 124th St. � R- 8 CA IM(P) 6 S 125th St. °° NW R— 8 R-8 UD RM—F ct rat cp CA > � R_8 NW 4th z. M-F F3 . 18 T23N R5E W 1/2 G� 70NiNG __ _ — _.. F Mton c� yea zo URnM EXHIBIT 2 olsm Sim A)N I NG MAP BO 4 92 93 455 j 456" 459 ; �` 461 i -- . . B 1 B 2 '.B3, B4 ..:. B'., : B6 :�i�'7 26 T24N R4E 25 T24N:R4E 30 T24N PSE �T24 �g'f24N R5 26 T24N iiSE 27.24N R5E : 26 T24N+Fi5E 81 94W 455W 457.._. 11 458 460 464 1 G2 C C'4' C5, C6 L -� 35 T24N'R4E 36 T24N R4E 31 T24N R5E 32T24N R5E 38+i 4N F -TF4M- 351�4N R5E 306 D1J� 307a88 �D D3 }309 �'D4 , 3 :- D 8 '� 801 D7 2 T23N POE , `l 23N F14E 6 T23N R5E T23N' R5E 4 T23N R5E 3 T23N R5E 2 T23N R5E 3.19 369 ' 805 806 _ t E2 3 E4',::: "�.E,5,. E:6;'T 7 1 T 3N ROE 12 T23N R4E T23N R5E 8 T23N R5E 9 T23N R5E 10 T23N R5E ; '" 11 T2 R5E 1 32 `� 326 - 27' .. 32'$ 370 810. . 80 .� 4 T23N Pt4E.:� � '� .13723N i=i4E 18 T23N R51 17 T23N R5E 16 T23N R5E 1 T23N R5E 14 T23N R5E: _ 1� 334 ",4335 336 337 371 815-- 816 f G 1 G3. r734 G6-3 T23N R4E 24 T23N R4E 19 T23N R5E 24 T23N R5E' 22 T23N R5E 23 T23N R5E 21 44 34 600 601 �: 602 820 ,_ 821 1'H2 H31,1H5, 1 �& H7... T23N R4E 25 T23 1 RdE 30 T23N R5E 29 ON R5E 28-T23N R5E .. 27 T23N R5E 26 T23N R5E 25 50 351�-__- 603 --�4_ 605 825 826 8 12 1.1 14 15..'6 1732T23N 3 E,.,. 36 T23N ROE 31 T231 R5E R5E- 33 T23N Rs�E _:. - .34 T23N R5E 35 T23N R5E 3E 607 608 610 632 833 1. �J_09 � 'PMTNF.F L4ILF " 2 J;7. 22N R4E 1. T22N 1`14E 6 T22N R5E 5 T22N RSE 4 T22N R5E 3 T22N R5E 2 T22N R5E 1 T2 RE3IDEKBAL MD(ED USE C NTE INDUSTRIAL Resource Conservation �• Ev Center Village In Industrial - Heavy RC ' .r R-1 Residential t du/ac r lJE-NI Urban Center - North 1 In Industrial - Medium IL Industrial - Light R-4 Residential 4 du/ac uC-N2 Urban Center - North 2 R-e I Residential B du/ac F-1-1 Center Downtown' (P) Publicly owned RRH Residential Manufactured Homes EDR Commercial/Office/Residential _---- Renton City Limits R-SG I Residential 10 du/ac 99MMEwrr"1. ---Adjacent Adjacent City Litnite a -la Residential to du/ne CA Commercial Arterial* � Book pages Boundary RM-F Residential Multi -Family cq Commercial Office* RN-T Residential Multi -Family Traditional CN Commercial Neighborhood TROLL PAGE Rn-11 Residential Multi-Famity Urban Center' PAGE# INDEX • May include Overlay Districts. See Appendix maps. For additional regulations in Overlay ` Districts, please see RMC 4-3. 5KT:7cwN.Nu=_ Printed by Print & Mail Services, City of Renton Renton -- Renton City Limits Parcels ® Renton Aerial 41* - ;--� -6--� ---� 100 0 Yn r. 44 Am -166 � . d'y r t ti w� SCALE 1 : 1,355 SiT 100 200 3oa FEET EXHIBIT 3 http://rentonnet.org/MapGuide/maps/Parcel-rnwf Wednesday, March 26, 2008 128 PM March 16, 2008 City of Renton DCED Planning Division Attention: Rocale Timmons, Assoc. Planner Dear Sir: It seems that the city is slowly but surely letting business and residential people continue to chip away at our small hillside and what little is left of our green belt. We are most concerned about the environment and the current request for a property line adjustment to the 400 Block of Taylor Place NW, Land Use Number LUA08-106, LLA,ECF. We would like to know just who is responsible for the upkeep of the stream/water runoff area. This water comes from under Taylor Ave. and runs under Rainier Ave. Several trees have fallen (due to storms, rotting, etc.), in this green belt and to encroach even further into this area could perhaps cause some flooding problems. It looks like a driveway must be built along the side of the stream as the only entrance to this property. We would like the city to consider an environmental impact study and notify us to who is responsible for this stream. Also there was no date as to when a public hearing would be held. We would like to receive all information on this project. Thank you. Mary Jo Carlson — 215 NW 5"' St -- Renton, WA 98057 Roberta and Ronnie McDonald — 216 NW 5"` St — Renton, WA 98057 Mr. and Mrs. Bruce Gregg -- 207 NW 5"' St. — Renton, WA 98057 4. GAe Zv .t tt Ltd b ., +�- " � " U'� A Mr. and Mrs. Roland Dewing —210 NW 5"' ST— enton, WA 98057 (The rest of the homes in this location are rentals) EXHIBIT 4 Y CITY )F RENTON _u +"R- �!j^�, ) * Denis Law, Mayor 1\T April 1, 2008 Department of Community and Economic Development Alex Pietsch, Administrator EXHIBIT 5 Jini llaiison Hanson Consulting 17446 Mallard Cove Lane Mt. Vernon, WA 98274 SUBJECT; Proposed Stream Buffer Averaging Taylor Lot Line Adjustment (LUA08-016, LLA, ECF) 400 Block of Tavlor Place NW Dear Mr. Hanson, This letter is sent in response to your request made as part of the Taylor Lot Line Adjustment (LUA08-016, LLA, ECF); dated February 22, 2008, to average a strearli buffer on the project site. Summary of Request The applicant proposes to average the stream buffer for a Class 4 stream can the project site from 35 feet to a minimum width of 25 feet on proposed Lot 1. The averaging 4z ould allow area for a small single family residence building pad. The total reduction of buffer is 608 square feet and would be replaced at a 1:1 ratio. Stream buffet' enhancerrrcnt is proposed as part of the buffer averaging proposal which wit] result in the plantinu of native plants. R.%,lC 4-4-050.L..5.d a I I o w s the Aiiministrator io Lip p1-0� C huil��I �� itltlI Li% Cr,I i11,! 1'01 CLs, 4 strearns where the buffer width is no less than 25 feet, prm itlM the applicant demonstrates all of the following criteria (pursuant to RMC 4-3-050. L.5.d.iii): iii. Criteria for Approval: Buffer width averaging may be allowed by the Administrator only where the applicant demonstrates all ofthc following: (a) The water body and associated riparian area contains variations in ecological sensitivity or there are existing physical improvements in or near the water body and associated riparian area; and (b) Buffer width averaging will result in no net loss oFstrearnllakc-riparian ecological function; and (c) The total area contained within the buffer after averaging is no less than that contained within the required standard buffer width prior to averaging, and (d) The proposed buffer standard is based on consideration of the best mailable science as described in WAC 365-195-905; or where there is an absence of valid scientific information, the steps in RMC. 4_9-25OF are followed. 1055 South Grady Way - Renton, Washington 98057 ® ThEs paper contains 5P. /, recycled materia:. WX, post consumer RENTON AIfP.2%D 0F THE CGRVh Backf4round A stream has been identified on the subject site, which flows west to east along the north border of the project site in a small ravine. The C ity's Streams and Lakes Map does not classify the stream. The applicant submitted a Stream Evaluation by Altmann Oliver Associates, LL.0 (dated February 19, 2008) delineating and classifying the strearn on the project site as a Class 4 stream. A Class 4 stream is a non-salmonid bearing intermittent stream and requires a minimum 35-foot buffer. The stream was not observed during the dry season, so intermittence could not be confirined. \ Class 4 streams require a minimum 35-foot buffer, however the applicant has proposed a reduction of buffer down to 25 feet through buffer averaging on certain portions of the site. "the applicant has proposed to increase the buffer on other portions of the site so there is no net loss. The reduced buffer would provide for a small building pad on Lot I far a family residence. The applicant indicated that approximately 608 feet of stream buffer would be affected as a result of the proposed averaging. A mitigation plan for the proposed stream buffer impacts,was submitted with the project application. The applicant would create an additional 008 square feet of stream buffer as part of the averaging proposal a l : i ratio. In addition to the proposal for buffer replacement the applicant is proposing buffer enhancement. Stream buffer enhancement will result in the planting of native plants and the removal of dense Himalayan blackberry and Indian plum_ The request for stream buffer averaging was made as part of the application for a Lot Line AdJUStnnent to adjust the lot lines for three parcels on a 0.51 acre site into two lots and Environmental (SEPA) Review for the future development of two single-family residences. The subject property is zoned Residential-8 (R-8), and is located in the 400 block of Talvor Place NWJust south of NW 5th Street. The current parcel size is 25,629 square feet and contains 2,545 square feet of critical areas on -site including the Class 4 stream and protected slopes. Analysis per RNIC 4-3-050.L.5.d.iii a) The water body and associated riparian area contains Variations in ecological sensitivity or there are existing physical improvements in or near the water body and associated riparian area The stream on the property is located within a well defined chaiincl approximately two feet wide at the bottom of the ravine. The upstream portion of the site is cuiverted tinder Taylor Place NW and drains through an adjacent parcel before entering the subject property. Runoff within the stream then enters another culvert off -site to the cast within the undeveloped right-of-way of Taylor Ave NW. y egetation within the riparian corridor of the stream is forested and dominated by a canopy of big -leaf maple with an understory ot'Himalayan blackberry, Indian plum, sword fens, and Lnglish ivy. b) Buffer width averaging will result in no net loss of streanvIakelriparian ecological function The proposed buffer reduction area is currently dominated by dense Himalayan blackberry, scattered with Indian Plum. Due to the degraded condition of the proposed buffer replacement area, the applicant proposes to plant a variety of native trees and shrubs to increase the plant species and structural diversity of the buffer. In addition, all invasive vine within the sloped portion of the buffer is proposed to be removed. Implementation of'the buffer averaging plan should increase the value of the buffer and would not detrimentally affect the ecological function of the stream. r) The total area contained "ithin the buffer after averaging is no less than that contained within the required standard buffer width prior to averaging The applicant proposes to reduce the stream buffer by 608 square feet in area. The applicant proposes to replace the stream buffer at a 1:1 ratio, or with 608 square feet of additional space. In no case would the bu#Ter be reduced below 25 feet. The total area within the buffer after the averaging would be no less than that contained within the required standard buf'(er prior to av eraginL,. d) The proposed buffer standard is based on consideration of the best available science as described in WAC 365-195-905; or where there is an absence of valid scientific information, the steps in R1VIC 4-9-250F are followed The City's Streams and Lakes Map does not classify the stream. The applicant submitted a supplemental stream study by Altmann Oliver Associates; LLC (dated February 19, 2008) delineating and classifying the stream on the project site in accordance with standards outlined in RMC 4-8-t20.1). Decision: Based on staffs analysis, I have determined the proposed revisions are within the parameters defined by the Renton Municipal Code. I'll ercforu, the proposed stream buffer averaging is apt)rM ed SUbject to the following conditions: The applicant shall be required to submit a stream mitigation plan per RNIG 4-8- 120. The mitigation plan shall include a buffer enllarnecnlent pion using nati%c vegetation that enhances or improves the functional attributes of the huffer. A maintenance and monitoring plan for a period no less than fi% e years, shall also he provided in the mitigation plan. The final mitigation plan must be submitted to and approved by the Current Planning Division project manager prior to the issuance of building or construction permits, whichever comes first. After the approval of the final mitigation plan, a performance surety per RNK' 4- 1-230 must be paid to the City of Renton for the maintenance and monitoring? period prior to the issuance of building or construction pen -nits, whichever comes first. Appeal Process: Appeals of this administrative decision must be filed in writing on or before 5:00 p.m. April 15, 2008. Appeals must be flied in writing, together with the required $75.00 application fee, with: Hearing Examiner, City of Renton, 1055 South Grady Way, Renton, WA 98055. Appeals to the Examiner arc governed by City of' Renton Municipal Code Section 4-8-110.B. Additional information regarding the appeal process may be obtained from the Renton City Clerk's Office, (425) 430-6510. Should you have any questions regarding this determination or the requirements discussed in this letter, please contact Rocale Timmons, Associate Plaruier, at (425) 430-7219. Sincerely, 1 Neil Watts, Director Development Services Division cc: yellow Jennifer Henning Rocale T'irrunons Party of Rccords City of Renton Department of Community & Economic Development ENVIRONMENTAL & DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET REVIEWING DFPARTMENT:&Onorn'iQCOMMENTS DUE: MARCH 24, 2008 APPLICATION NO: LUA08-016, LLA, ECF DATE CIRCULATED: MARCH 10, 2008 APPLICANT: Jim Hanson PLANNER: Rocale Timmons PROJECT TITLE: Taylor Lot Line Adjustment PLAN REVIEWER: Mike Dotson SITE AREA: 25,269 square feet EXISTING BLDG AREA (gross): N/A LOCATION: 400 Block of Taylor P#ace NW PROPOSED BLDG AREA(gross) NIA WORK ORDER NO: 77872 SUMMARY OF PROPOSAL: The applicant is requesting Environmental (SEPA) Review and a Lot Line Adjustment to adjust the lot lines on a .51 acre site into two lots for the future development of two single-family homes.The subject property is zoned Residential-8 (R-8), and is located in the 400 block of Talor Place NW just south of NW 5th street. The current parcel size is 25,629 square feet and contains 2,545 square feet of critical areas on -site including a Category 4 stream and critical slopes. The proposed project would result in impacts to the stream on site and their associated buffer areas. A. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT (e.g_ Non -Code) COMMENTS Element of the Environment Probable Minor Impacts Probable Major Impacts More Information Necessary Earlh Air Water Plants LandlShoreline Use Animals Environmental Heaith Fr;ergyl Natural Resources B. POLICY -RELATED COMMENTS C_ CODE -RELATED COMMENTS Element of the Environment Probable Minor Impacts Probable Major impacts More Information Necessary Housin Aesthetics Li hUGlare Recreation Utilities Transportation_ Public Services Historic/Cultural Preservation Airport Environment 10, 000 Feet 14, 000 Feet We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas in which we have expertise and have identified areas of probable impact or areas where additional information is needed to properly assess this proposal. k/t�� -31(6 7/ _ Signature of Director or Authorized Representative Date CITY - 1F R.ENTON +S ,v ♦ Department of Community and Economic Development March 25. 2008 Mr. and Mrs. Bruce Gregg 207 NW 5"' Street Renton, WA 98057 RL: Taylor Lot .Line Adjustment (LUA08-016) Dear Mr. and Mrs. Gregg: Thatik you for your comment letter regarding the Taylor Lot Line Adjustment. Your letter has been included in the official project file and you have been made a party of record. Your comments and questions will be considered by the revie«'ing official befOFe making a decision on this project, The proposed project requires a Lot Line Adjustment, a type H permit. anal Environmental Review, a type III permit. Type 11 and III permits do not require an open record public hearing, The Environmental Review Committee is scheduled to nIcct on March 31, 2008 to issue a threshold determination; this is not a public mectin�!. I-lowever. the threshold determination can be appealed to the Hearin, Examiner ' ithin 14 days of the decision. If you have any further questions regarding this project feel free to contact me at (425) I70-721 J. Sincerely, Rocale Timmons Associate Planner I055 South Grady Way - Renton, Washington 98057 eThis paper cnntavis 501A recydedjnaterial, 305o pesteonsurner RENTON A riLAD OF THE CURVE. p C� Denis Law, Mayor Vhirch 25, 200S Mary Jo Carlson 15 NNV 5`, Street Renton, WA 98057 RF: Taylor Lot Line Adjustment (LUA08-016) Dear '`GIs. Carlson: CITY 1F RENTON Department of Community and Economic Development Alex Pietsch, Administrator Thank you for your comment letter regarding the Taylor Lot Line Adjustment. Your letter has been included in the official project file and you have been rnade a party of record. Your comments and questions will be considered by the reviewing official before itiaking a decision on this project. The proposed project requires a Lot Line Adjustment, a type II permit, and Ens ironmental Review, a type III permit, Type 11 and III permits do not require an open record public hearing. The Environmental Review Committee is scheduled to meet on March 31. 2008 to issue a threshold determination; this is not a public meeting. However, the threshold detennination can be appealed to the Hearing Examiner within 14 days of the decision. If'you have any further questions regarding, this project feel free to contact me at (425) 470-7219. Sincerely, ' 1 If P,6cale'fimmons .Associate Planner 1055 South Grady Way - Renton, Washington 98057 eT`�is paper contains 50 % recycled material, 30°f post consumer RENTON 1HFAD 0il THE CURVF. Y CITY -1F RENTON N '; Denis Law,1.7ayor March 25, 2008 Mr. and Mrs. Roland Dc`,'ing 210 NE 5"' Street Renton, WA 98057 RE: Taylor Lot Line Adjustment (LUA08-016) Dear Mr. and Mrs. During: Department of Community and Economic Development Alex Pietsch, Administrator Fhank you for your comment letter regarding the Taylor Lot Line Adjustn7c11t. Your letter has been included in the official project file and you have been made a party of record. Your comments and questions will be considered by the reviewing official beforc snaking a decision on this project. The proposed project requires a Lot Line Adjustment, a type It permit, and Environmental Review, a type III permit. Type II and III permits do not require an open record public hearing. The Environmental Review Committee is scheduled to elect on March 31, 2008 to issue a threshold determination; this is not a public meeting. However, the threshold determination can be appealed to the Hearing. Examiner within 14 days of the decision. If you have any further questions regarding this project feel free to contact rrte at (425) 430-7219. Sincerely. �(" L Neale Timmons Associate Planner 1055 South Grady Way - Renton, Washington 98057 eThis paper contains 50% recyded material, 3fJ post consumer RENTON :11-1HA 11 01- THE CURVE K4 ��I�/ a Denis Law, Mayor March 25, 2008 Roberta and Rotuiie McDonald 216 NW 5 "' Street Renton. �,VA 98057 RE: Taylor Lot Line Adjustment (LUA08-016) Dear Mr. and Mrs. McDonald'. CITY )F RENTO Department of Community, and Economic Development Alex Pietsch, Administrator Thank you for your comment letter regarding the "Taylor Lot Line Adjustment. Your letter has been included its the official project file and you hay e been made a party o[ record. Your comments and questions will be considered by the rew itw-Ing official hefbrc making a decision on this project. The proposed project rcquires a Lot Line Adjustment, a type II permit, and Environmental Review, a type III permit, Type II and III permits do not require an open cecord public hearing. The E.nvironniental Review Committee is scheduled to meet on March 31, 2008 to issue a threshold determination, this is not a pus kc meetHIL, However, the threshold determination cats be appealed to the Hearing Examiner wvithin 14 days of the decision. If you have any further questions regarding this project feel free to contact me at (425) 430-7219. Sincerely, l�6cale "fimn1ons Associate Planner 1055 South Grady Way - Renton, Washington 98057 0 This papercurtains50%recydedmatenal.30%postconsumer RENTON AIIEAD OP T11E CUPVF, March 16, 2DD8 City of Renton DCED Planning Division Attention: Rocale Timmons, Assoc. Planner Dear Sir: 1.9 �.a It seems that the city is slowly but surely letting business and residential people continue to chip away at our small hillside and what little is left of our green belt. We are most concerned about the environment and the current request for a property line adjustment to the 400 Block of Taylor Place NW, Land Use Number LUA08-106, LLA,ECF. We would like to know just who is responsible for the upkeep of the stream/water runoff area. This water comes from under Taylor Ave. and runs under Rainier Ave. Several trees have fallen (due to storms, rotting, etc.), in this green belt and to encroach even further into this area could perhaps cause some flooding problems. It looks like a driveway must be built along the side of the stream as the only entrance to this property. We would like the city to consider an environmental impact study and notify us to who is responsible for this stream. Also there was no date as to when a public hearing would be held. We would like to receive all information on this project. Thank you. Mary Jo Carlson — 215 NW S"h St -- Renton, WA 98057 dv Roberta and Ronnie McDonald — 216 NW 5"' St — Renton, WA 98057 ram i t V F4 w Mr. and Mrs. Bruce Gregg — 207 NW 5"' St. — Renton, WA 98057 "' Ar C- -4 Mr, and Mrs. Roland Dewing —210 NW 5'' STMenton, WA 98057 (The rest of the homes in this location are rentals) 475-R), FIRE DEPARTMENT +M E M O R A N D U M DATE: 3/18/08 TO: Mike Dotson, Plan Reviewer CC: Rocale Timmons, Planner FROM: David Pargas, Assistant Fire Marshal SUBJECT: LUA08-016, LLA, ECF - TAYLOR LOT LINE ADJUSTMENT Fire Department Comments & concerns: 1. Please review comments and concerns noted in the November 1, 2007 Pre - Application meeting. See attached comments dated 10/24/07. The comments addressed in the November 1, 2007 meeting are still applicable to this project. 2. Hydrants to be fully operational before combustible construction is allowed. 3. ADDRESSING: Both temporary and permanent addressing is to be visible from the public way. 4. Provide Hammerhead turnaround as noted in tre Pre -Application. i:lcity memos'M final & prelim re0lua08-016,11a, cef taylor lot line adjustment.doc City of Renton Department of Community & Economic Dev—opment ENVIRONMENTAL & DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: F're P rey COMMENTS DUE: NiARI.H 24, 200$ APPLICATION NO: LUA08-016, LLA, ECF DATE CIRCULATED: MARCH 1 2008 APPLICANT: Jim Hanson PLANNER: Rocale Timmons MAR PROJECT TITLE: Taylor Lot Line Adjustment 2608 PLAN REVIEWER: Mike Dotson SITE AREA: 25,269 square feet EXISTING BLDG AREA r `ss : NIA LOCATION: 400 Block of Taylor Place NW PROPOSED BLDG AREA -- WORK ORDER NO: 77872 SUMMARY OF PROPOSAL: The applicant is requesting Environmental (SFPA) Review and a Lot Line Adjustment to adjust the lot lines on a .51 acre site into two lots for the future development of two single-family homes.The subject property is zoned Residential-8 (R-8), and is located in the 400 block of Talor Place NW just south of NW 5th street. The current parcel size is 25,629 square feet and contains 2,545 square feet of critical areas on -site including a Category 4 stream and critical slopes. The proposed project would result in impacts to the stream on site and their associated buffer areas. A_ ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT (e.g_ Non -Code) COMMENTS Element of the Environment Probable Minor Impacts Probable Major Impacts More Information Necessary Earth Air water Piants Land/Shoreline Use Animals Environmental Health Energy/ Natural Resources B. POLICY -RELATED COMMENTS C. CODE -RELATED COMMENTS 140 Element of the Environment Probable Minor Impacts Probable Major Impacts More Information Necessary Hcusin Aesthetics Light/Glare Recreation Utilities Trans ortafron Public Services Historic/Cultural Preservation Airport Environment 10.000 Feet 14.000 Feet We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas in which we have expertise and have identified areas of probable impact or areas where additional information is needed to properly assess this proposai. Signature of Director or Authorized Representative Date City of I on Department of Community & Economic Dev—opment ENVIRONMENTAL & DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET REVIEWING DEPARTMENT- In COMMENTS DUE: MARCH 24, 2008 APPLICATION NO: LUA08-016, LLA, ECF DATE CIRCULATED: MARCH 10, 2008 APPLICANT: Jim Hanson PLANNER: Rocale Timmons PROJECT TITLE: Taylor Lot Line Adjustment PLAN REVIEWER: Mike Dotson CiirUr r.rti,L)w SITE AREA: 25,269 square feet EXISTING BLDG AREA ross : N/A REGEIV D LOCATION: 400 Block of Taylor Place NW PROPOSED BLDG AREA(gross) NfA MAR 10 :-:!g WORK ORDER N0: 77872 RI Ili n1lo SUMMARY OF PROPOSAL: The applicant is requesting Environmental (SEPA) Review and a Lot Line Adjustment to adjust the lot lines on a .51 acre site into two lots for the future development of two single-family homes.The subject property is zoned Residential-8 (R-8), and is located in the 400 block of Talor Place NW just south of NW 5th street. The current parcel size is 25,629 square feet and contains 2,545 square feet of critical areas on -site including a Category 4 stream and critical slopes. The proposed project would result in impacts to the stream on site and their associated buffer areas. A. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT (e.g. Non -Code) COMMENTS Element of the Environment Probable Minor Impacts Probable Major Impacts More Information Necessary Earth Air Water plants Land/Shoreline Use Animals Fnvironmentai Health Energy/ Natural Resources B. POLICY -RELATED COMMENTS C. CODE -RELATED COMMENTS Element of the Environment Probable Minor Impacts Probable Major Impacts More Information Necessary Housing Aesthetics Light/Glare Recreation Utilities Transportation Public Se vices Historic/Cultural Preservation Airport Environment 10.000 Feet 14,000 Feet We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas in which we have expertise and have identified areas of probable impact or areasZheadditional information is needed toproperlyassess this proposal. nature of Directoor Authorized Representative Date City of on Department of Community & Economic Dev—opment ENVIRONMENTAL & DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: f aars COMMENTS DUE: MARCH 24, 2008 APPLICATION NO: LUA08-016, LLA, FCF DATE CIRCULATED: MARCH 10, 2008 APPLICANT: Jim Hanson PLANNER: Rocale Timmons PROJECT TITLE: Taylor Lot Line Adjustment PLAN REVIEWER: Mike Dotson SITE AREA: 25,269 square feet EXISTING BLDG AREA (gross): NIA LOCATION: 400 Block of Taylor Place NW PROPOSED BLDG AREA(gross) NIA WORK ORDER NO: 77872 SUMMARY OF PROPOSAL: The applicant is requesting Environmental (SEPA) Review and a Lot Line Adjustment to adjust the lot lines on a .51 acre site into two lots for the future development of two single-family homes.The subject property is zoned Residential-8 (R-8), and is located in the 400 block of Talor Place NW just south of NW 5th street. The current parcel size is 25,629 square feet and contains 2,545 square feet of critical areas on -site including a Category 4 stream and critical slopes. The proposed project would result in impacts to the stream on site and their associated buffer areas. A. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT (e.g. Non -Code) COMMENTS Element of the Environment Probable Minor Impacts Probable Major Impacts More Information Necessary Earth AIr Water Plants Land/Shoreline Use Animals Elmronmentai Health Energy/ Natural Resources B. POLICY -RELATED COMMENTS C. CODE -RELATED COMMENTS Element of the Environment Probable Minor Impacts Probable Major Impacts More Information Necessary Housin Aesthetics Light/Glare Recreation Utilities Trans ortation Pubiic Services Historic/Cultural Preservation Airport Environment 10, 000 Feet 14 060 Feel We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas in which we have expertise and have identified areas of probable impact or areas where a ditional information is e led to properly assess this proposal. Z /./Z) Z//) YL4�� / Signature of Director or Authorized Represe ative Dat CITY OF RENTON DCED DIVISION - CURRENT PLANNING DEPARTMENT AFFIDAVIT OF SERVICE BY MAILING On the 17th day of March, 2008, 1 deposited in the mails of the United States, a sealed envelope containing Revised Notice of Application documents. This information was sent to: Name Representing Agencies See Attached (Signature of Sender): STATE OF WASHINGTON ) SS COUNTY OF KING ) I certify that I know or have satisfactory evidence that Stacy Tucker signed this instrument and acknowledged it to be his/her/their free and voluntary act for the uses and purposes mentioned in the instrument. `—\\4Wk It Dated: 3 otary Public in an Notary (Print): �w.be r-- My appointment expires: _Vq_VC) Project Name: Taylor Lot Line Adjustment Project Number: LUA08-016, LLA, ECF the Sate of�� s ++, iF+ wnsO, template - affidavit of service by mailing Dept. of Ecology' Environmental Review Section PO Box 47703 Olympia, WA 98504-7703 WSDOT Northwest Region " Attn: Ramin Pazooki King Area Dev. Serv., MS-240 PO Box 330310 Seattle, WA 98133-9710 US Army Corp. of Engineers Seattle District Office Attn: SEPA Reviewer PO Box C-3755 Seattle, WA 98124 Boyd Powers * Depart. of Natural Resources PO Box 47015 Olympia, WA 98504-7015 AGENCY (DOE) LETTER MAILING (ERC DETERMINATIONS) WDFW - Larry Fisher* 1775 12th Ave. NW Suite 201 Issaquah, WA 98027 Duwamish Tribal Office . 4717 W Marginal Way SW Seattle, WA 98106-1514 Muckleshoot Indian Tribe Fisheries Dept. Attn: Karen Waiter or SEPA Reviewer 39015 — 172n" Avenue SE Auburn, WA 98092 _ Muckleshoot Cultural Resources Program Attn: Ms Melissa Calvert 39015 172ld Avenue SE Auburn, WA 98092-9763 KC Wastewater Treatment Division ' Office of Archaeology & Historic Environmental Planning Supervisor Preservation" Ms. Shirley Marroquin Attn: Stephanie Kramer 201 S. Jackson ST, MS KSC-NR-050 PO Box 48343 Seattle, WA 98104-3855 Olympia, WA 98504-8343 KC Dev. & Environmental Serv. Attn: SEPA Section 900 Oakesdale Ave. SW Renton, WA 98055-1219 City of Newcastle Attn: Mr. Micheal E. Nicholson Director of Community Development 13020 SE 72" Place i Newcastle, WA 98059 City of Kent Attn: Mr. Fred Satterstrom, AICP Acting Community Dev. Director 220 Fourth Avenue South Kent, WA 98032-5895 Metro Transit Puget Sound Energy City of Tukwila Senior Environmental Planner Municipal Liason Manager Steve Lancaster, Responsible Official Gary Kriedt Joe Jainga 6300 Southcenter Blvd. 201 South Jackson Street KSC-TR-0431 PO Box 90868, MS: XRD-01 W Tukwila, WA 98188 Seattle, WA 98104-3856 Bellevue, WA 98009-0868 Seattle Public Utilities State Department of Ecology Real Estate Services NW Regional Office Title Examiner 3190 160`h Avenue SE 700 Fifth Avenue, Suite 4900 Bellevue, WA 98008-5452 PO Box 34018 Seattle, WA 98124-4018 Note: If the Notice of Application states that it is an `Optional DNS", the marked agencies and cities will need to be sent a copy of the checklist, PMT's, and the notice of application. * template - affidavit of service by mailing REVISED NOTICE OF APPLICATION AND PROPOSED DETERMINATION OF NON -SIGNIFICANCE -MITIGATED (DNS-M) DATE: March 17 2008 LAND USE NUMBER: LUA08-016, LLA, ECF PROJECT NAME: Taylor Lot Line Adjustment PROJECT DESCRIPTION: The applicant is requesting Environmental (SEPA) Review and a Lot Line Adjustment to adjust the lot lines for three parcels on a .51 acre site into two lots for the future development of two single-family homes. The subject property is zoned Residential-8 (R-8), and is located in the 400 block of Taylor Place NW just south of NW 5th street. The current pamei size is 26,629 square feet and contains 2,545 square feet of critical areas on -site including a Category 4 stream and critical slopes. The proposed project would result in impacts to the stream buffer on site through proposed buffer averaging. PROJECT LOCATION: 400 Block of Taylor Place NW OPTIONAL DETERMINATION OF NON -SIGNIFICANCE, MITIGATED (DNS-M): As the Lead Agency, the City of Renton has determined that significant environmental impacts are unlikely to result from the proposed project Therefore, as permitted under the 1 43.21CA 10, the City of Renton is using the Optional DNS-M process to give notice that a DNS- M is likely to be issued. Comment periods for the project and the proposed DNS-M are integrated into a single comment period There will be no comment period following the issuance of the Threshold Determination of Nan -Significance - Mitigated (DNS-M}. A 14-day appeal period will follow the issuance of the DNS-M. PERMIT APPLICATION DATE: February 22, 2008 NOTICE OF COMPLETE APPLICATION: March 10, 2008 1 REVISED: March 17, 2008 APPLICANT/PROJECT CONTACT PERSON: Jim Hanson - Hanson Consulting; Tel: (360) 422-5056 Permits/Review Requested: Environmental ($EPA) Review, Lot Line Adjustment Other Permits which may be required: Construction and Building Permits Requested Studies: Stream Study and Geotechnical Report Location where application may be reviewed: Department of Community & Economic Development (CED) — Planning Division, Sixth Floor Renton City Hall, 1055 South Grady Way, Renton, WA 98057 PUBLIC HEARING: NIA CONSISTENCY OVERVIEW ZoninglLand Use: The subject site is designated Residential Single Family (RSF) on the City of Renton Comprehensive Land Use Map and Residential - 8 (1 dwelling units per acre on the City's Zoning Map. Environmental Documents that Evaluate the Proposed Project: Environmental (SEPA) Checklist Development Regulations Used For Project Mitigation: The project will be subject to the City's SEPA ordinance, Residential Zoning Development Standards RMC 4-2-120A and other applicable codes and regulations as appropriate. Proposed Mitigation Measures: The following Mitigation Measures will iikely be imposed on the proposed project These recommended Mitigation Measures address project impacts not covered by existing codes and regulations as cited above. The applicant shall follow the recommendations of the stream study submitted with the application. Comments on the above application must be submitted in writing to Rocale Timmons, Associate Planner, CED — Planning Division, 1055 South Grady Way, Renton, WA 98057, by 5:00 PM on March 24, 2008. If you have questions about this proposal, or wish to be made a party of record and receive additional notification by mail, contact the Project Manager Anyone who submits written comments will automatically become a party of record and will be notified of any decision on this project CONTACT PERSON: Rocale Timmons, Associate Planner; Tel (425) 430-7219; Emil rtimmons@ci.renton.wa.us PLEASE INCLUDE THE PROJECT NUMBER WHEN CALLING FOR PROPER FILE IDENTIFICATION If you would like to be made a party of record to receive further information on this proposed project, complete this form and return to: City of Renton, DCED — Current Planning Division, 1055 So. Grady Way, Renton, WA 98057. NamelF=lle No : Taylor Lot Line AdjustmentlLUA08-016, LLA, i MAILING ADDRESS - TELEPHONE i City of Renton Department of Community & Economic Dev—opment ENVIRONMENTAL & DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET RFVIEWING DEPARTMENT: COMMENTS DUE: MARCH 24, 2008 APPLICATION NO: LUA08-016. LLA, ECF DATE CIRCULATED: MARCH 10, 2008 APPLICANT: Jim Hansen_.__-..-----__--__.__ PLANNER: Rocale Ti _ PROJECT TITL Taylor Lot Line Adjustment PLAN REVIEWE : Mike Dotson SITE AREA: 25,269 square feet EXISTING BLDG AREA ross : NIA v LOCATION: 400 Block of Taylor Place NW PROPOSED BLDG AREA(gross) N/A WORK ORDER NO: 77872 PLEASE RETURN TO ROCALE TIMMONS IN CURRENT PLANNING 6TH FLOOR SUMMARY OF PROPOSAL: The applicant is requesting Environmental (SEPA) Review and a Lot Line Adjustment to adjust the lot lines on a .51 acre site into two lots for the future development of two single-family homes.The subject property is zoned Residential-8 (R-8), and is located in the 400 block of Tailor Place NW just south of NW 5th street. The current parcel size is 25,629 square feet and contains 2,545 square feet of critical areas on -site including a Category 4 stream and critical slopes. The proposed project would result in impacts to the stream on site and their associated buffer areas. A. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT (e.g. Non -Code) COMMENTS Element of the Environment Probable Minor Impacts Probable Major Impacts More Information Necessary Earth Air Water Piants Land/Shorefime Use Animals Environmental Health Fnergy/ Natural Resources B. POLICY -RELATED COMMENTS C. CODE -RELATED COMMENTS Element of the Environment Probable Minor Impacts Probable Major Impacts More Information Necessary Housing Aesthetics light/Glare Recreation utilities Transportation Public services Historic/Cultural Preservation Airport Environment 10.000 Feet 14.000 Feet We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas in which we have expertise and have identified areas of probable impact or areas where additional information is needed to properly assess this proposal. Signature of Director or Authorized Representative Date NOTICE OF APPLICATION AND PROPOSED DETERMINATION OF NON -SIGNIFICANCE -MITIGATED (DNS-M) DATE: LAND USE NUMBER: PROJECT NAME: March 10, 21 LUAD8.016, LLA. ECF t aylcr Lot Line Adjustment PROJECT DESCRIPTION: 'de applicant Is recuestil Environmental (SEPAi Review and a Lot Gne Adjustment to adjust the lot Imes on a 0.51 acre site into two lots for the future development of twe single family homes.The s.lbjecr propedy s zoned Residential-8 (R-8), and Is locates in the 400 block of Talon Place NW just south o: NW Sift street. The current Parcel size :s 25,629 square feet and contains 2,545 square feet of critical areas on -site oduding a Categcr/ 4 stream and critical slopes. The proposed project would result in impacts to the stream on site and their associated buffer areas. PROJECT LOCATICI 400 Elcck of Taylor Place NW OPTIONAL DETERMINATION OF NON -SIGNIFICANCE, MITIGATED (DNS-i As tie Lead Agency, the City at Renton has determines that sig�4ificanl env,ronmenla'. impacts are unlikely I. result from the proposed project Therefore, as permifled untler the RCW 43.21 C_110 the City of Renton is using the Optional DNS-M process to gi✓e IIrate DNS- M is nicely ;o be issued Comment periods for the project and the proposed DNS-M are inteorated into a single comment period There will he rio comment period following the issuance of me Threshold Deferminatior. of Non-Sigrndicance- Mitigated (DNS-M) A 14-day appeal period wig follow the issuance of t1-e DNS-M. PERMIT APPLICATION DATE: February 22, 2008 NOTICE OF COMPLETE APPLICATION: March 10, 2000 APPLICANTlPROJECT CONTACT PERSON: Jim Hanson -Hanson Consulting; Tel: (360) 422,5056 PermitslRevlew Requested: Environmental [SEPA} Review, Lot Line Adjustment Other Permits which may be required: Construction and Building permits Requested studies: Stream study and G-1—finical Report Location where application may be reviewed: PUBLIC HEARING; CONSISTENCY OVERVIEW: Zon[ngli-and Use: Environmental Documents that Evaluate the Proposed Project: Development Regulations Used For Project Mitigation: Department of Community & Economic Development (OCED)- Current Planning Division, Sixth Flaor Renton City Hall, 1055 South Grady Way, Renton. WA 98057 NIA The subject fire is designated Residential Single Family (RSF) on the City of Raritan Comprehensive Land U$e Map and Fesidental -8 (R-8i dwelling units pot acre on the City's Zonino Map. Environmental (SEPA) CheckLs! Proposed Mitigation Measures: The FOIIJ'wmg Mitigatcn Measures will likely be imposed cn Ole proposed project These iecommerded Mili,alion Measures address poled impacts not covered by eals11nc, codes aric reg ulahnns as ,red above • The app,a.w shah lopov Ire ac,,,,endat;ons ci the snr:arn study submitted wdn hie appf'catied. Comments on the above application must be submitted in writing to Rocale Timmons, Associate Planner, DCED - Current Planning Division, 1055 South Grady Way, Renton, WA III by 5:00 PM on March 24, 21 If you have queslions about this proposal or wish to he made a party of record and receive addi!unal netitication by mail, contact the Prnjec! Manager. Anyone wio submits written comments will automatically become a party of record and will be notified of any decision on Ih s proiecl CONTACT PERSON; Rocale Timmons, Associate Planner; Tel (4261420-7219; Ernl: rtimmonsgc€.henton.wa.us PLEASE INCLUDE THE PROJECT NUMBER WHEN CALLING FOR PROPER FILE IDENTIFICATION The project will he subject to the City's SEPA ordinance, Residential Zoning - - Develcpoen; Slandards RMC 4-2-120A and other applicable codas and If You would like to be made a party of record to receive further informsh. on this proposed project, complete regulations ss epprcpol this form and return to City of Renfro D:;ED - Current Planing Division, 1055 So. Grady Way, Renton. WA 56057. NameW le No . Taylor Lot Line Adiu5lmen9LUACS-1716. LLA, L" F NAME MAILING ADDRESS. I FLEPHONE NO.: CERTIFICATION I, �' )d- � " , C -,K— 1Aj vt , hereby certify that ^ S copies of the above document were posted by me in-3 conspicuous places or nearby the described rop on DATE: — r r D SIGNS :��r ATTEST: Subscribed and sworn before me, a Notary Public, in and for the State of Washington residing inAk ii .Jk�J on the i i�J *� day of �1C{ LHw4 f� 1ti�� NOTARY PUBLIC SIGN U (�+I 1k1111A��t i CITY OF RENTON DCED DIVISION - CURRENT PLANNING DEPARTMENT AFFIDAVIT OF SERVICE BY MAILING On the 10th day of March, 2008, 1 deposited in the mails of the United States, a sealed envelope containing Acceptance Letter, NOA, Environmental Checklist, Site Plan PMT documents. This information was sent to: Name Representing Agencies See Attached Jim Hanson Owner/Applicant/Contact C. Hanson LLC Owner Surrounding Property Owners See Attached (Signature of Sender STATE OF WASHINGTON ) SS COUNTY OF KING ) I certify that I know or have satisfactory evidence that Stacy Tucker signed this instrument and acknowledged it to be his/her/their free and voluntary act for` '�Ns and purposes mentioned in the instrument. � JWN �Vc fef Dated:�� Notary Public in an or the Satero V ' ington Notary (Print):_ 6y"b o r 4.�1tnrn � n `i UA My appointment expires: 11Wp�1',,`' Project Name: Taylor Lot Line Adjustment Project Number: LUA08-016, LLA, ECF template - affidavit of service by mailing AGENCY (DOE) LETTER MAILING (ERC DETERMINATIONS) Dept. of Ecology Environmental Review Section PO Box 47703 Olympia, WA 98504-7703 WSDOT Northwest Region " Attn Ramin Pazooki King Area Dev. Serv., MS-240 PO Box 330310 Seattle, WA 98133-9710 US Army Corp. of Engineers Seattle District Office Attn: SEPA Reviewer PO Box C-3755 Seattle, WA 98124 Boyd Powers * Depart. of Natural Resources PO Box 47015 Olymp . WA 98504-7015 KC Dev. & Environmental Serv. Attr- SEPA Section 900 Cakesdale Ave. SW Renton, WA 98055-1219 Metro Transit Senior Environmental Planner Gary Kriedt 201 South .Jackson Street KSC-TR-0431 _Seattle, WA 98104-3856 Seattle Public Utilities Real Estate Services Title Fxaminer 700 Fifth Avenue, Suite 4900 PO Box 34018 Seattle, WA 98124-4018 WDFW - Larry Fisher' 1775 12th Ave, NW Suite 201 Issaquah, WA 98027 Duwamish Tribal Office 4717 W Marginal Way SW Seattle, WA 98106-1514 KC Wastewater Treatment Division " Environmental Planning Supervisor Ms. Shirley Marroquin 201 S. Jackson ST, MS KSC-NR-050 Seattle. WA 98104-3855 City of Newcastle Attn: Mr. Micheal E. Nicholson Director of Community Development 13020 SE 72n� Place Newcastle, WA 98059 Puget Sound Energy Municipal Llason Manager Joe Jainga PO Box 90868, MS: XRD-01 W Bellevue, WA 98009-0868 State Department of Ecology NW Regional Office 3190 160`h Avenue SE Bellevue, WA 98005-5452 Muckleshoot Indian Tribe Fisheries Dept, Attn: Karen Walter or SEPA Reviewer 39015 — 172"Q Avenue SE Auburn, WA 98092 Muckleshoot Cultural Resources Program Attm Ms Melissa Calvert 39015 17Z" Avenue SE Auburn, WA 98092-9763 Office of Archaeology & Historic Preservation* Attm Stephanie Kramer PO Box 48343 Olympia, WA 98504-8343 City of Kent Attn: Mr. Fred Satterstrom, AICP Acting Community Dev. Director 220 Fourth Avenue South Kent, WA 98032-5895 City of Tukwila Steve Lancaster, Responsible Official 6300 Southcenter Blvd. Tukwila, WA 98188 Note: If the Notice of Application states that it is an "Optional DNS", the marked agencies and cities will need to be sent a copy of the checklist, PMT's, and the notice of application. * template - affidavit of service by mailing 420240033001 420240025007 420240124008 ANDEBRHAN TESFU BARNES ANGELA L BAUER EDDIE 413 MAPLE AVE NW 2733 34TH AVE 5 501 RAINIER AVE N RENTON WA 98055 SEATTLE WA 98144 RENTON WA 98055 956480013609 C HANSON LLC 17446 MALLARD COVE LN MOUNT VERNON WA 98274 956480014003 CARLSON MARY JO 215 NW 5TH RENTON WA 98055 420240130500 CHRISTOPHERSON R LEE 503 RAINIER AVE N RENTON WA 98055 956480016503 DEWING ROLLAND L 210 NW 5TH ST RENTON WA 98055 956480016008 GREGG BRUCE+SUE 207 NW 5TH ST RENTON WA 98055 420240039008 HEFLIN JUAN S 401 TAYLOR PL NW RENTON WA 98055 420240033506 JONES FOSTER+TRACEY E 421 MAPLE AVE NW RENTON WA 98055 420240025502 LAL RAJ ESHWAR+SHANKAR SHARM 426 LIND AVE NW RENTON WA 98057 420240038505 CAGE DANNY L 403 TAYLOR PL NW RENTON WA 98055 420240039503 CARMONA PAUL 206 NW 4TH RENTON WA 98055 956480013500 CONWELL ROY L+GAIL M 27028 140TH LN SE KENT WA 98042 420240037507 FERNANDEZ SERGIO+BERTHA A 407 TAYLOR PL NW RENTON WA 98055 420240035006 HARBOUR HARRY L 451 MAPLE AVE NW RENTON WA 98055 420240026609 JAMES EDWARD N JR 156 WHITMAN CT NE RENTON WA 98059 956480015000 KEBEDEATSEBHA 456 TAYLOR PL NW RENTON WA 98055 420240020503 CALSADO ERLINDA D 463 LIND AVE NW RENTON WA 98055 420240021907 CHERRY JOHNNY L+DELMUNDO GLORIA S 457 LIND AVE NW RENTON WA 98055 420240026500 DAVY JOHN A 420 LIND AVE NW RENTON WA 98055 420240023903 GOODFELLOW CLAYTON+BERTHA 12921 SE 247TH PL KENT WA 98030 420240036509 HECK JAMES+HELEN 461 TAYLOR PL NW RENTON WA 98057 956480011009 JDA GROUP LLC 95 S TOBIN ST #201 RENTON WA 98055 420240035501 KOPAVI JESSE & STEPHANIE 457 MAPLE AVE NW RENTON WA 98055 420240015909 956480012502 LAMOREAUX LISA M+INGRAM DAWN MCDONALD RONNIE M 216NW5TH 503 LIND AVE NW RENTON WA 98055 RENTON WA 98055 956480011504 420240022004 420240042002 MOLINE MICHELLE NGUYEN CAO NGUYEN HOANG 516 TAYLOR PL NW 453 LIND AVE NW 450 TAYLOR PL NW RENTON WA 98055 RENTON WA 98055 RENTON WA 98055 420240023507 956480014508OTIS SHURONDIA RENEE 956480012601 NUSS STEVEN G & KARLA D REEVES OLLIE MAE PAHM THAN VAN+THU-HUONG THI 12431 SE 160TH 304 NW 5TH ST RENTON WA 98058 211 NW 5TH ST RENTON WA 98055 RENTON WA 98055 420240034504 PENNELLTERRENCE C 425 MAPLE AVE NW RENTON WA 98055 420240021006 SAELEE KAO KWAI 459 LIND AVE NW SEATTLE WA 98055 420240125500 U-HAUL REAL ESTATE COMPANY DBA U-HAUL CO / WESTERN WA 701.49 PO BXO 29046 PHOENIX AZ 85038 420240024505 QUIROZ MICHAEL E 462 LIND AVE NW RENTON WA 98055 420240025403 SHANKAR RAIESHWAR LAL+SHARMILA R 452 LIND AVE NW RENTON WA 98055 420240142505 RIVILY ROBERT 254 SENECA AVE NW RENTON WA 98055 420240025106 THACHER H 454 LIND AVE NW RENTON WA 98055 NOTICE OF APPLICATION AND PROPOSED DETERMINATION OF NON -SIGNIFICANCE -MITIGATED (DNS-M) DATE: LAND USE NUMBER PROJECT NAME: March 10, 2008 LUA48-016, LLA, ECF Taylor Lot Line Ad}ustment PROJECT DESCRIPTION: The applicant is requesting Environmental (SEPA) Review and a Lot Line Adjustment to adjust the lot lines on a 0.51 acre site into two lots for the future development of two single-family homes.The subject property is zoned Residential-8 (R-8) and is located in the 400 block of Talor Place NW just south of NW 5th street. The current parcel size is 25,629 square feet and contains 2,545 square feet of criticai areas on -site including a Category 4 stream and critical slopes. The proposed project would result in impacts to the stream on site and their associated buffer areas. PROJECT LOCATION: 400 Slack of Taylor Place NW OPTIONAL DETERMINATION OF NON -SIGNIFICANCE, MITIGATED (DNS-M): As the Lead Agency, the City of Renton has determined that significant environmental impacts are unlikely to result from the proposed project Therefore as permitted under the RCVV 43.21C.110, the City of Renton is using the Optional DNS-M process to give notice that a DNS- M is likely to be issued. Comment periods for the project and the proposed DNS-M are integrated into a single comment period There will be no comment period following the issuance of the Threshold Determination of Non -Significance - Mitigated (DN5-M). A 14-day appeal period will follow the issuance of the DNS-M. PERMIT APPLICATION DATE: February 22, 2008 NOTICE OF COMPLETE APPLICATION: March 10 2008 APPLICANTIPROJECT CONTACT PERSON: Jim Hanson - Hanson Consulting; Tel: (360) 422-5056 Permits/Review Requested: Environmental (SEPA) Review, Lot Line Adjustment Other Permits which may be required: Construction and Building Permits Requested Studies: Stream Study and Geotechnical Report Location where application may be reviewed: Department of Community & Economic Development ill — Current Planning Division, Sixth Floor Renton City Hall, 1055 South Grady Way, Renton, WA 98057 PUBLIC HEARING: NIA CONSISTENCY OVERVIEW: Zoning/Land Use: The subject site is designated Residential Single Family {RSF) on the City of Renton Comprehensive Land Use Map and Residential - 8 (R-8) dwelling units per acre on the City's Zoning Map Environmental Documents that Evaluate the Proposed Project: Environmental (SEPA) Checklist Development Regulations Used For Project Mitigation: The project will be subject to the City's SEPA ordinance, Residential Zoning Development Standards RMC 4-2-120A and other applicable codes and regulations as appropriate. Proposed Mitigation Measures: The following Mitigation Measures will IikeEy be imposed on the proposed project These recommended Mitigation Measures address project impacts not covered by existing codes and regulations as cited above The applicant shall follow the recommendations cf the stream study submitted with the application. Comments on the above application must be submitted in writing to Rocale Timmons, Associate Planner, ACED — Current Planning Division, 1055 south Grady Way, Renton, WA 98057, by 5:00 PM on March 24, 2008. If you have questions about this proposal, or wish to be made a party of record and receive additional notification by mail, contact the Project Manager. Anyone who submits written comments will automatically become a party of record and will be notified of any decision on this project. CONTACT PERSON: Rocale Timmons, Associate Planner; Tel (425) 430-7219; Eml: rtimmons@ci.renton.wa.us PLEASE. INCLUDE THE PROJECT NUMBER WHEN CALLING FOR PROPER FILE IDENTIFICATION If you would like to be made a party of record to receive further information on this proposed project, complete this form and return to: City of Renton, DCED — Current Planning Division, 1055 So. Grady Way, Renton, WA 98057. Name/File No - Taylor Lot Line Adjustment/LUA08-016, LLA, EC>= NAME: MAILING ADDRESS: TELEPHONE NO.. CITY 3F RENTON ru De+ "R nis I,aw, Mayor March 10, 2008 . Jlrr1 Hanson Hanson Consulting 17446 Mallard Cove Lane MI Vernon. WA 98274 Subject: Taylor Lot Liine Adjustment LUA08-016, LLA, ECF Dear Mr. Hanson: Department of Community and Economic Development Alex Pietsch, Administrator The Planning Section of the City of Renton has determined that the subject application is complete according to submittal requirements and, therefore, is accepted for review. It is tentatively scheduled for consideration by the Environmental Review Committee on March 31, 2008. Prior to that review, you will be notified if any additional information is regUired to continue processing your application. Please contact me at (425) 430-7219 if you have any questions, Sincerely, R 'cale 'fimnions Associate Planner 1055 South Grady Way _ Renton, Washington 98057 This paper c?ntains 50% recycled material, 30%post consumer RENTON AElEAD of "THE CURVE � I )A 09 L q (I City of Renton LAND USE PERMIT FFIB zlm�, MASTER APPLICATION pECENFA PROPERTY OWNER(S) NAME: is , 14v->oAj ADDRESS: 17' 44:F )r1') f,R 17 Ld G� •:►� CITY: raj i rJe� R�;c.c; WA zIP: TELEPHONE NUMBER: 3e�o - 4 2- 2- Se) -s-4, APPLICANT (if other than owner) NAME: COMPANY (if applicable): ADDRESS: CITY: ZIP: TELEPHONE NUMBER CONTACT PERSON NAME: /4AAJS rr,10 COMPANY (if applicable): JtAAJ,0,0- C_0105" .tT?u ADDRESS: i ,94"44AP Lckja -Z-,j CITY: In W i4 ZIP: gN�Oq TELEPHONE NUMBER AND E-MAIL ADDRESS: 3-4 2 z -os,� PROJECT INFORMATION PROJECTOR DEVELOPMENT NAME: PROJECT/ADDRESS(S)1LOCATION AND ZIP CODE: 4t�D P Lk- T-Ay.�Ojt P&- Al uJ KING COUNTY ASSESSOR'S ACCOUNT NUMBER(S): q'Is; 6 49b o 13 (0 n9 EXISTING LAND USE(S): tkC-AA-01 �LCA-"5 PROPOSED LAND USE(S): 2 EXISTING COMPREHENSIVE PLAN MAP DESIGNATION: 6/.06LE 4AA I i-c1 PROPOSED COMPREHENSIVE PLAN MAP DESIGNATION (if applicable): 1-4 A EXISTING ZONING: A-9 PROPOSED ZONING (if applicable):j! 04 SITE AREA (in square feet): (o SQUARE FOOTAGE OF PUBLIC ROADWAYS TO BE DEDICATED: CD SQUARE FOOTAGE OF PRIVATE ACCESS EASEMENTS: •PROPOSED RESIDENTIAL DENSITY IN UNITS PER NET ACRE (if applicable): NUMBER OF PROPOSED LOTS (if applicable): NUMBER OF NEW DWELLING UNITS (if applicable): 2— Q:weblpw/devserv/forms/pianning/masterapp.doc 1 02/21/08 PR1 :CT INFOR NUMBER OF EXISTING DWELLING UNITS (if applicable): JAI A SQUARE FOOTAGE OF PROPOSED RESIDENTIAL BUILDINGS (if applicable): Am 4v5,9d SQUARE FOOTAGE OF EXISTING RESIDENTIAL BUILDINGS TO REMAIN (if applicable): 1v A SQUARE FOOTAGE OF PROPOSED NON-RESIDENTIAL BUILDINGS (if applicable): Jyf.-I- SQUARE FOOTAGE OF EXISTING NON-RESIDENTIAL BUILDINGS TO REMAIN (if applicable): N A7 NET FLOOR AREA OF NON-RESIDENTIAL BUILDINGS (if applicable): x �v NUMBER OF EMPLOYEES TO BE EMPLOYED BY THE NEW PROJECT (if applicable): r) MATION contin PROJECT VALUE: IS THE SITE LOCATED IN ANY TYPE OF ENVIRONMENTALLY CRITICAL AREA, PLEASE INCLUDE SQUARE FOOTAGE (if applicable): ❑ AQUIFER PROTECTION AREA ONE ❑ AQUIFER PROTECTION AREA TWO ❑ FLOOD HAZARD AREA sq. ft. ❑ GEOLOGIC HAZARD sq. k ❑ HABITAT CONSERVATION sq. ft. 1d SHORELINE STREAMS AND LAKES sq. ft. ❑ WETLANDS sq. ft. LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF PROPERTY I (Attach legal description on separate sheet with the following information included) SITUATE IN THE !�'r,(j QUARTER OF SECTION Z, TOWNSHIP fkkANGE-, IN THE CITY OF RENTON, KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON. TYPE OF APPLICATION & FEES List all land use applications being applied for: 1. L LA 3. 2. zx)oI AnAjAg�i9L RSV/E-t<j 4. Staff will calculate applicable fees and postage: $ I AFFIDAVIT OF OWNERSHIP I I, (Print Name/s) _6 AAA C5 C- YY7 1_)J7p .c� , declare that I am (please check one) the current owner of the property involved in this application or _>r__ the authorized representative to act for a corporation (please attach proof of authorization) and that the foregoing statements and answers herein contained and the information herewith are in all respects true and correct to the best of my knowledge and belief. certify that I know or have satisfactory evidence that d �rylli , tz I-1 �10 k! signed this instrument and acknowledged it to be hislher/their free and voluntary act for the uses and purposes mentioned in the instrument. �Jgnatwe Owner/Representative) of Owner/R1k1Q1011 My AppoIkNAl"M ExPires Ckw 111: 2011 '1 Not ry Public in and for the State of Washington Notary (Print) My appointment expires: ' : _..I Q iwcb/pw/devserv/forms/planning/m asterapp.doe 2 02/21 /08 CF,RTIFICATION OF AUTHORITY OF C. HANSON LLC FEB 2220 This LLC is managed by its members. The names and addresses of each of the current members of C. HANSON LLC, are listed below. Each of these persons has managerial authority of the LLC and is empowered to transact business on its behalf. Member name: Member address: James C. Hanson 17446 Mallard Cove Lane, Mount Vernon, WA. 98274 Jana Hanson 17446 Mallard Cove Lane, Mount Vernon, WA 98274 David J. Hanson 6917 Silent Creek Ave. SE, Snoqualmie, WA 98065 Kelly A. Hanson 6917 Silent Creek Ave. SE, Snoqualmie, WA 98065 Further, all four members identified above are specifically authorized to transact the following business on behalf of the LLC: Banking, including the establishment of new accounts and signing on any accounts in the name of C. HANSON LLC. Dated this j- of Marsh, 2006. C. HANSON LLC its member HANSON, its member DAVID J. HANSON, its member KELLY A. HANSON, its member MRR 14 ZOOS 3:50PM RES[ 'H IN MOTION FROM FRS to pea 34 2006 3t03M REOEORCH IM MOTIC" ATM flY Alit W 425-9: 3090 P. 1 Mair-. 14 2006 84:16PM Pi 4�fr-0�7-BD98 �. 1 � L%G 1s �� 7'O,� � �sw ■r1 ilrwraa�f�k�[i�+raMt�w�iirs dG 1L1t�RtILC. are Wei 1w{rw. S�ef lf�e�Aor � y d M • ILC �i�pa�rwwtla�i�s�lNln� aiMia�w ��r�airre Jw C_ V S 1w1i "Cw*Lsok Yarn! WA *W I=fhmw Yf4*MdWW*nlml hkWVW"% WA !n7d LWAG S. Etas= O!!7 �WsL�wtwrM. f4 iw�iNi� WA "NO WA MW heiw, gi /w ummi n w.riti dwm w foa deawso wo in *Now owb&*iaO blil�ar! ow<i�Mif o[1�s tLG BY�isiitaliiniawedto�oo�rraow�b� m�M�nwriabrr,ns etc. MAJOW f.UG ©OW 06A of mo* me c MAN" LLC 7Al�06 � HAt, �r darYr• Ow► �. r��uaK,ar�s� Z=YA.= is mom" CHICAGO TrrLE INSURANCE COMPANY STANDARD OWNER POLICY SCHEDULE A (Continued) Policy No.: 1234250 LEGAL DESCRIPTION PARCEL A: LOT 8, BLOCK 4, WOODY GLEN ADDITION, ACCORDING TO THE PLAT THEREOF, RECORDED IN VOLUME 47 OF PLATS, PAGE 91, IN KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON; EXCEPT THAT PORTION THEREOF LYING SOUTH OF A LINE RUNNING FROM THE MOST WESTERLY CORNER OF SAID LOT TO A POINT 120 FEET DISTANT (MEASURED ALONG THE SOUTHERLY BOUNDARY THEREOF) FROM THE MOST SOUTHERLY CORNER THEREOF. PARCEL B: LOT 9, BLOCK 4, WOODY GLEN ADDITION, ACCORDING TO THE PLAT THEREOF, RECORDED IN VOLUME 47 OF PLATS, PAGE 91, IN KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON; EXCEPT THE WESTERLY 120 FEET THEREOF. PARCEL C: THAT PORTION OF LOT 5, BLOCK 4, WOODY GLEN ADDITION, ACCORDING TO THE PLAT THEREOF, RECORDED IN VOLUME 47 OF PLATS, PAGE 91, IN KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON, LYING SOUTH OF A LINE RUNNING FROM THE MOST EASTERLY CORNER OF SAID LOT TO A POINT ON THE WESTERLY MARGIN OF SAID LOT, 45 FEET NORTHERLY FROM THE MOST SOUTHERLY CORNER OF SAID LOT. ALTAOPAS/RDA/0999 ^EVELOPMENT SERVICES DIVISION! ❑EV CI- d� R Np PLANNING WAIVER ..F SUBMITTAL REQUIRL...ENTS FOR LAND USE APPLICATIONS FEB 2 2 2M DECEIVED Irrigation Plan 4 Landscape Plan, Conceptual _egal Description 4 Mailing Labels for Property Owners a 1 j 1 1 Aaster Application Form 4 leiqhborhood Detail Map 4 his requirement may be waived by: Property Services Section Public Works Plan Review Section Building Section Development Planning Section PROJECT NAME: l xylDy I - LA DATE: Al?t' / rU 0:1WEBlPMDEVSERV1ForrnslPlanninglwaiverofsubmittalregs_9-06.xls 09106 DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DIVISION WAIVI OF SUBMITTAL REQUII MENTS FOR LAND USE APPLICATIONS Parking, Lot Coverage & Landscaping Analysis 4 f JF-I I Plat Name Reservation 4 IPreapplication Meeting Summary 4 1 1 I I Rehabilitation Plan 4 Site Plan 2 AND a [Stream or Lake Study, Supplemental 4 1 j j 1 Street Profiles 2 opography Map 3 (Tree Cutting/Land Clearing Plan 4 I I I f Utilities Plan, Generalized 2 Wetlands Mitigation Plan, Preliminary 4 1 1 1 J Wireless: Applicant Agreement Statement 2AND 3 Inventory of Existing Sites 2 AND 3 Lease Agreement, Draft 2AND.3 Map of Existing Site Conditions 2 AND 3 Map of View Area 2AND 3 . Photosimulations 2 AND 3 -his requirement may be waived by: Property Services Section PROJECT NAME: L� '. Public Works Plan Review Section Building Section DATE: _ Development Planning Section Q:IWEG\PWIDEVSERWormslPlanninglwaiverofsubmittalreg! ,_9-06.xls 09106 I rr DEVELOPMENT PLANNING CITY OF RENTON FEB 2 2 2008 Pre -application meeting for the RECEIVED Taylor Lot Line Adjustment PRE07-095 City of Renton Development Services Division November 1, 2007 Contact information Planner: Elizabeth Higgins, AICP, (425) 430-7382 Public Works Plan Reviewer: Mike Dotson, (425) 430-7304 Fire Prevention Reviewer: Corey Thomas (425) 430-7024 Building Department Reviewer; Craig Burnell, (425) 430-7290 Please retain this packet throughout the course of your project as a reference. Consider giving copies of it to any engineers, architects and contractors who work on the project. Pre-screening: When you have the project ready for submittal, have it pre-screened before making all of the required copies. The pre -application meeting is informal and non -binding. The comments provided on the proposal are based on the codes and policies in effect at the time of review. The applicant is cautioned that the development regulations are regularly amended and the proposal will be formally reviewed under the regulations in effect at the time of project submittal. The information contained in this summary is subject to modification and/or concurrence by official decision -makers (e.g., Hearing Examiner, Zoning Administrator, Public Works Administrator, and City Council). I Y o CITY OF RENTON rp FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU MEMORANDUM DATE: October 24, 2007 TO: Elizabeth Higgins, Senior Planner FROM: Corey Thomas, Plans Review Inspector SUBJECT: Comments for Taylor Lot Line Adjustment 1. The minimum fire flow required is 1,000 gpm for dwellings up to 3,600 square feet in area. One fire hydrant is required within 300-feet of the structure. For dwellings over 3,600 square feet minimum fire flow is 1,500 gpm and a minimum of two fire hydrants within 300-feet is required. (Square footage for dwellings include garage and basements areas.) There appears to be one existing fire hydrant within 300-feet of each proposed dwelling. The hydrant on the corner of NW 51h PI and Taylor PI NW needs to be equipped with a 5-inch storz fitting. 2. Fire apparatus access road of paved 20-feet width required on Taylor Avenue Northwest. Approved hammerhead turnaround is required. cT: ct taylorsp PLANNINGIBUILDINGI Ut�l PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT M E M O R A N D U M To: Elizabeth Higgins Frorn: Mike I)otson Date: October 31, 2007 Subject: PreApplieation Review Comments PREAPP No. 07-095 Taylor- 400-500 Taylor Ave NW VOTE ON PREI.IM]NARY REVIEW COMMENTS CONTAINED IN THIS REPORT: 'rhe following comments on development and permitting issues are based on the pre -application submittals made to the City of Renton b} the applicant. The applicant is cautioned that information contained in this summary May be subject to modification and/or coneu rrence by official decision rnaker-s (e.g_ Hearing Examiner, Boards of Adjustment, Board of Public Works nad Cit} Co:incil). Revie+i comments may also need to be revised based on site planning and other design changes required by the City or made by the applicant_ The following continents concern various utility and transportation issues that are associated with development of the subject site. WATER: 1. This project site is located in the 300 Water Pressure Zone. 2. There is an existing 1-inch `eater line bisecting the site. There are 8-inch and 10-inch lines around tiie perimeter of the site. Fire flow available is approximately 1000-1500 gallons per minute. The static water pressure at the street level is approximately 77 psi. 3. Water main improvements along Taylor five NW may be required for to meet the minimum hydrant spacing and domestic connections. 4. Water system development fees are $1,956 per new dwelling unit. SANJTARY SEWER: 1. There is an existing 8-inch sewer main in Taylor Place NW, 2. The Sewer Development Charges of S 1,017 per new dwelling unit are collected as part of the building construction pernrt. STREET INlPROVENCENTS: 1. Fully improved roadvvays with curb, gutter, sidewalk and street lighting already exist at the site. l.xisting site ingress arid egress is adequate. 2. A traffic mitigation fee of $75 per additional trip generated/day is required for the site. This fee is due at time of permit. 3. All new electrical, phone and cable services and lines must be underground. The construction of these franchise utilities must be inspected and approved by a City of Renton public works inspector prior to Occupancy. STORM DRAINAGE: 1. This site is located in the Sout'n Renton drainage basin. 2. Site drainage niust meet the requirements of the 1990 King County Surface Water Drainage Manual. 1:1Plan Review",.Plan Rcvio%�, 2007,`,Taylor .Ave pre-app 07-095.doc CITY OF RENTON PI annin g/Building/Pub lie Works MEMORANDUM DATE: November 1, 2007 TO: Pre -Application File No. PRE07-095 FROM: Elizabeth Higgins, Senior Planner, (425) 43 0-73 82 SUBJECT: Taylor LLAIShort Plat, Taylor Place NW General: We have completed a preliminary review of the above -referenced development proposal. The following comments on development and permitting issues are based on the pre -application submittals made to the City of Renton by the applicant and the codes in effect on the date of review. The applicant is cautioned that information contained in this summary may be subject to modification and/or concurrence by official decision -makers (e.g., Hearing Examiner, Zoning Administrator, Development Services Director, Planning,BuildingiPublie Works Administrator, and City Council). Review comments may also need to be revised based on site planning and other design changes required by City staff or made by the applicant. The applicant is encouraged to review all applicable sections of the Renton Municipal Code. The Development Regulations are available for purchase for $50.00 plus tax, from the Finance Division on the first floor of City Hall and are available on the City of Renton website (www.rentonwa,gov). Project Proposal: The subject property is located on the 400 block of Taylor Place NW, abutting the west side of the undeveloped right-of-way for Taylor Ave NW. The proposal is to adjust an underlying line within the 0.51 acre legal parcel to form 2 lots suitable for single- family residential development. The problem with this request is that there is currently one underlying legal lot (tax parcel). Adjustment of a line interior to this parcel would not, in and of itself, create 2 legal lots. If there were underlying legal lots with 2 tax identification numbers, such a line could be `adjusted." A short subdivision is required to create more than one tax lot. `r� �A / L' The property is zoned Residential 8 (R-8). The proposed lots would be 9,360 sf and 12,855 sf. The property is impacted by steep slopes, potential landslide areas, a stream or streams and is heavily wooded. Current Use: The 22,011 square foot parcel is currently vacant. It is in an area of single and multi -family development and has commercial uses (accessed from Rainier Ave) to the east. Comprehensive Plan Land Use Designation: The property is located within the Residential Single Family Comprehensive Plan land use designation. Zoning: The property is located in the Residential 8 zone. Single-family residential is the primary use in the R-8 zone. Development of one detached, single-family residence on each H-',Division.s',.i)cvelop.ser`,Dev&plan.ing',.CRH',Preapplication reports2007 Preapplicatiom\07-095 Tavior (R8, 2 5FR).doc Taylor LLA Preapplication Meeting November 1, 2007 Page 2 of 3 legal lot would be allowed. The density range in the R-8 zone is between a minimum of 4 dwelling units per net acre (du/a) and 8 du/a. "Net density" is a calculation of the number of housing units and/or lots that would be allowed on a property after critical areas, public rights -of -way, and legally recorded private access easements are subtracted from the gross area of the property. Environmental Review: Short plats of nine or fewer lots are exempt from Washington State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA) review unless critical areas are known to be on or near the site. Development of this particular property may be impacted by a nearby stream or streams, landslide hazards, and steep slopes. Therefore, a wetland/stream study, geotechnical report, and an environmental review by the City of Renton Environmental Review Committee would be required. Encroachments and Easements: If there are any encroachment issues with neighboring lots, we recommend that the applicant address these prior to commencing to develop the property. A property survey, which is required with the land use master application submittal, will indicate such encroachments. Density: The minimum housing density in the R-8 zone is 4 units per acre and the maximum is 8 units per acre. The 2 lot subdivision would have a net density of 7.5 dwelling units per net acre (du/a). Critical Areas: As stated above, the site may have critical areas present. It is the applicant's responsibility to ascertain whether critical areas will impact the proposed development. Development Standards: RMC 4-2-1 10A, "Development Standards for Single Family Zoning Designations" apply to new development on the site, A copy of these standards is being provided at the pre -application meeting. Lot size and dimensions - The proposed single-family development narrative indicates that the property will be subdivided into individual lots. The R-8 zone requires a minimum lot size of 5,000 sq. ft. for parcels less than one acre in size prior to subdivision. The minimum width is 50 feet for interior lots and 60 feet for corner lots. The minimum lot depth is 65 feet. The proposed lots would be irregularly shaped, due to the original lot configuration combined with the critical areas on the site. Although the steep slopes would create complications for development, the lots may be suitable for custom -designed houses. Verification of site stability would be required by means of the geotechmcal study. Lot coverage The R-8 zone allows a maximum building coverage of 35% or 2,500 sq. ft. on lots 5,000 sq. ft. or greater. Setbacks - Setbacks are the distance between the building and the property line or any private access easement. Setbacks are different for the front, side, and rear yards. The fapades fronting on the access street will be considered the front. The front yard setback is required to be a minimum of 15 feet for the primary structure and 20 feet for an attached garage accessed from the front or side yard street. The minimum rear yard setback is 20 feet. Taylor LLA Preapplication Meeting November 1, 2007 Page 3 of 3 Building height - Building height is restricted to 20 feet and 2 stories in the R-S zone. Landscaping: The development standards require that all pervious areas of the residential lots be landscaped. All landscape areas are to include an underground irrigation system. A conceptual landscape plan shall be submitted at the time of application. Access: Lot I would be accessed from Taylor Place NW. The second lot would be accessed from an as yet undeveloped public right-of-way (Taylor Ave NW). The applicant proposes paving a 20 foot wide road in the r-o-w, terminating approximately 445 feet north of the intersection of Taylor Place NW and Taylor Ave NW with a hammerhead turnaround. Driveway slopes cannot exceed fifteen percent (15%) without a variance from development standards. Driveways sloped eight percent (8%) or more must have slotted drains at the bottom of the slope. Permit Requirements: Two lot short plats are reviewed administratively. Following the environmental review, the Planning/Building/Public Works Administrator will approve, approve with conditions, or deny the short plat. If the preliminary short plat is approved, the applicant must complete the required improvements and satisfy any conditions of the preliminary approval before the plat can be recorded. The newly created lots may be sold only after the plat has been recorded. Fees: In addition to the applicable building and construction permit fees, the following mitigation fees would be required prior to the recording of the plat: A Transportation Mitigation Fee based on $75.00 per each new average daily trip attributable to the project. A fire mitigation fee of $488.00 per new unit (single-family) Please see the comments from the Fire Prevention plans reviewer and Public Works plans reviewer for a breakdown of the fees. A handout listing all of the City's Development related fees is also included with the preapplication package for reference. Expiration: The preliminary short plat approval is valid for two years with a possible one- year extension. In advance of submitting the full application package, applicants are strongly encouraged to bring in one copy of each application item for a pre-screening to the customer service counter to help ensure that the application is complete prior to making all copies. cc: Jeraiifer Henning Page 1 of 1 ,dim Hanson From: "Elizabeth Higgins" <Ehiggins@ci.renton.wa.us> To: "Jinn Hanson" <jchanson@vedzon.net> Sent: Tuesday, November 06, 2007 7:58 AM Subject. Taylor Lot Line Adjustment Waiver sheet sent yesterday. Yes, we still have the 15' exception for slopes (see note sent yesterday). If you say this can be done by the City of Renton, then I guess it can be done. The fact that I do not see how it can be done is probably a false impediment (I also do not understand why the lights go on when you flip the switch). You may proceed with your application submittal. If you require a formal letter of above let me know Elizabeth No virus found in this incoming message. Checked by AVG Free Edition. Version: 7.5.503 / Virus Database: 269.15.23/1113 - Release Date: 11/6/2007 10:04 AM 2/21 /2008 o �y 14A a �a.fv a a+iI 51 b N R•b p 4 AA v { iT ^ 9I- nea 8 � 10, n * 3 n = 4 12 v fig: t°14 t 7 5T n .°° , g a Ic 19 ti 3-86 t_GT R !7ftl i e� DER _ ,, ,CRO�V NO. MORTGAGOR PLATMAP AP Vol PG 46— row..._ .. r T 1 C xW t("y' t=GrN ^ RSV I? s Av : v s3,y kti* O teary 6 w 1 { 2 50 Otto `6CT a e° 15 ti '! a 6 b 2 f�9a'• p° Iss ty a,y A 5 _ bqL 9 es 13 +tip t 144 - � C2f 4 f`� • i �4 'g 6 � `} x to 0� N Vl +F" rid A o � IO $ a 27 +� , ,- t;, a - C g 91"t 51 • 4 cz 9 4 �pL dib 2g y° tt 4 y4Y. fhb' (- I .. n rn° 4 �1 r A P� tl /!D•dI Q tT• yPt° 22 ao w l}�odeast 2 ""'e'I5 3 L i ' • 4 21.4. tsJh nl .w\ � ryt3 �; = 3 t}� 14i =r3 tAv7 ' a 2 ° 4 13 M * 2 Fi 6 20 t, Gad°c? 09�5 p 9 a 3 h , �-• �{ i%� , _ 'i•' l� rF �--- G to Y •..t p....•. €_%tl..-._ f I �i 135./F \ I _ - � ti A�'� I �• }2s 5`r J • - __ _. _. _ ice.!-�,T.T_^=..,,.�i This mar roe4 Ylfif �)t1YCi�ri m show all hig'r,L;'ays, roads or easements affecting said nrnperttI; ov V G 1N Fie 2 z zoos WORKSHEET FkecP-1NE" City of Renton Development Services Division 1055 South Grady Way -Renton, WA 98055 Phone: 425-430-7200 Fax: 425-430-7231 1. Gross area of property: 1. (� square feet 2. Deductions: Certain areas are excluded from density calculations. These include: Public streets*" Private access easements Critical Areas* Total excluded area: 3. Subtract line 2 from line 1 for net area: 4. Divide line 3 by 43,560 for net acreage: 5. Number of dwelling units or lots planned: 6. Divide line 5 by line 4 for net density: square feet square feet Y:�Z square feet 2. _ .." ", - square feet `-.ti 3. square feet 4. _ acres 5. a units/lots 6. _ ^_ dwelling units/acre *Critical Areas are defined as "Areas determined by the City to be not suitable for development and which are subject to the City's Critical Areas Regulations including very high landslide areas, protected slopes, wetlands or floodways." Critical areas buffers are not deducted/excluded. "* Alleys (public or private) do not have to be excluded. hap://mntmwe-gm/upkmdWFilesMusimss MPW/DEVSERV/FQRMS_PLANNNG/dmity.dm I Last update[ HANSON CONSULTI NG MNG � c01 oV�rrKT° l Jim Hanson DEB Z�QB 360-422-5056 February 21, 2008 Development Services Division 1055 South Grady Way Renton WA. 98055 Subject: Application for the Taylor Ave Lot Line Adjustment and Environmental Review Taylor Ave NW Dear Staff: This proposal is for a Lot Line Adjustment to make three existing legal parcels into two lots. One house will be constructed on each lot. The three parcels were created prior to a requirement for a short plat. I have attached a deed showing the three parcels in 1961. Each of the parcels is made up of pieces of larger lots. Parcel A and B are of legal size to build on now but are not configured such that a house cannot be reasonably placed because of steep slopes and a creek. The proposed configuration will allow one small building pad on the new lot ## 1 fronting on Taylor PI N W and a larger building pad on lot #2 fronting on Taylor Ave NE. I have also enclosed an Environmental Checklist for the LLA and Building permits for each house. Attached is a geo-tech report that indicates that a building may be 10 feet from the regulated slope to the foundation. If the foundation is 4 feet deep then the setback would be 6 feet from the top of slope (10 feet from the face of slope). AOA has performed a stream study which is attached. The stream in question is a Class 4 stream requiring a 35 foot setback. We are proposing to average the buffer on lot #1. The minimum width of the buffer will be 25 feet which is allowed by the code for a class 4 stream. No trees will be removed as part of the LLA. When we apply for the Building Permit we will provide the required landscape plan and tree checklist. In any case no trees will be removed within the regulated slope areas or within the buffer area. Buffer enhancement is proposed as part of the buffer averaging which will result in planting significant native plants. (See attached mitigation plan) Each of the new lots will be over the minimum of 5,000 square feet required in the zone. Lot 1 will be approximately 9360 square feet and lot #2 will be about 12,855 square feet. Lot #1 averages 52.5 feet in width with 45 foot frontage on Taylor PI NW. If you have any questions please call me at 360-422-5056. T 7 You: im Hanson Taylor PI LLA/Building Permits Construction Mitigation Plan The following is a construction mitigation plan for the infrastructure associated with the Taylor PI LLA/Building Permits The proposed construction may begin as soon as the LLA and Building Permits are approved, summer of 2008, and will continue for about 6 months once started. The hours of operation will be per the City of Renton ordinance covering construction work in residential neighborhoods. Hauling will primarily be done from the existing Taylor Ave NW to the north or south and then to Rainier Ave S. Very little material will need to be hauled onto or off of the site. Excavation will be limited to the side sewer, water meters and foundations. Sweeping and or flushing depending on what is appropriate at the time will clean any dirt or mud coming from the site. Dust will be kept to a minimum by watering if needed. Excavated areas will be protected per the King County S WM manual as adopted by the City of Renton. A traffic control plan will be addressed at the time of the construction permits. ym:4114 �1 9 • Spy Ww"Mtr M*" THE GRA9T!'Ms Robert L. Edwards and Jane I- Edwards, his wife 2008 Sae and 0: OOcerddradas), t Ten is heed lrid, iR� , �- --^„ s ; No . mow; t�. - is fe George Tsutakawra and Aname Tsutaka the 405awft net ettase, iMseW >• flee Casty of 1�6 . ab" of W#thTa�oei: - (a j Lot 8, Bloch 4. Woody Coen Addition,' according to plat reco; ed in volume 47 of plats, page 91, in King County, Wa►Ahingtonj E7Cthat portion thereof lying south of -a line running frorc 'he most _ westerly corner of said lot to a paint "1b0 feet distant (measured along the southerly boundaary. therecd) from the a moot southerly cotaar thereof. : (b) Ldt 9. Black 4, Woody Glen Addition, acc-jrding to plat recorded in volume 47 of plats, page 91, in King County, Washington,, EXCEPT the westerly 1201e6t thereof- (c) That portion of lot 5, block 4. Woody Glen Addition, Iccarding to plat recorded in volume 47 of plats. page 91, in King County, 's Washington; lying south of lime running from the most easterly s corner of said lot to a point on the westerly margin of said lot 45 feet northerly from tUe most southerly corner of said fat. (d) Lot 11, Block 4, Woody Glen Addition. r. Ybr Gea pew s 1w themselves and Na their metres in istWrat do bf ttiwe pseva" eg Hwy boil the ememan of nee dead to than tataala arpeesad od seeped, .d ooreeesta a tw ir! arise by, Aste der or emir iaepiirades, gad da_ baee* esnwast fist Spild aR Veneer wiawro. I lipr t ! chino- w to s oiat by, eI er ssehe eeid Gcm* r mad an Mb toloe, they VM fsa wtas- ad defend flee Held dP r a teal arta�e Dew Ukh 5th dey of January . A D. 19 61 STATE OF WASMWGTON, Conat! of n"=' 04 this day Pareeatii a I bdwe no Robert L. Edwards sr.dl Jt,re 1. &iv:_rds to oat knot" T t l �wYo emedeaed tine rrifMie led a � )satrs.,etet. and °d ." Jteedac Ri their ttra sod fthmft q aft sad amid, tar the taai.>•a perpae� t MUH setdri my Mead! I 5th dr4 of Jnra!ar;f lfinl: fir+ lyaderj F*W is a W fir.iRlff of lbw"Wes. 09br U• Milr ism I • rrdo to jam is i owls 04. j ,j Ott gj b, /. •o i G tort car Lat .** lot 504is pt IM tte Wly - bou nawy .s s�1 36t 5. 45 rt Of ter ISly t *or of lot ft**%w*6 sly tm Lly m" ofOtt) po. 'so, J1olt*d 40%1 bs U01a Q* um"r fP 08*4 s, otblft.4" 1ivAi. SoA 4* ml to era" * I OAK v ISYAM PA(-iF- idb 02121 / 2000 14: 30 4254325933 GMES AND ASOC P: Pr� FdO� 0 whnp1H1MA kq0-MAWARCM C {d1 M4 tc Lot Closures - Prepared using Surveil/Civil Solutions for AutOCAD Searing Mode Date Prepared: 1/8/2008 Drawing: fLANSo-03A--PRELLHINARY SLA2. dwg Measur meet Units: feet ----------------------------------------------- JIM RANSON LOT LINE ADJUSTMENT RENTON PARCEL C (OLP) Searing Distance Northing/Lat 5091.769 N 89003'04" K 01.46 1.449 5093.21'7 5 30°00'54" E 45.00-38_965 5054.252 N 59059`06" E 15.00 31.517 5091.769 Closure in iat/Dep: 0.000 -------- Starting Point: 5091.769 Distance Error: S 99"S9.59" w 0.m Total Distance: 207.46 Acmracy Ratio: 1.51,866 Area: 2,687 ft2 0.039 Acres Easting/Dep 3406.578 Start (POB) --87.448 3319.130 22.510 3341.640 64.942 3406.582 -0.004 3406.578 02121 / 2M 14: 38 4254325933 CRDES AND ASSOC rpt,- n1 P:Wmjeft DAD Drow VAHWANSO-43APARCEL 8 IOLD)-Ptc Lot Closures - Prepared using Survey/Civil Solutions for AuteCAD Bearing Mode Date Prepared: 1/5/2008 Drawing: HANSO-03A-PRELIMINARY W A2.dwg Measu rewAnt Units: feet LOT LINE ADJUSTMENT RENTON PARCEL 8 (OLD) Bearing Distance Northing/Lat Vesting/Uep -------------- 5 59059.06" W 103.35 -51.698 3573-056 Start (POB) -89.490 5 30p00154" E 60.00 5045.005 -51.954 3485.566 30-014 S 30n00954" E 00.00 4993.051 -69.271 3515.500 40-018 N 89025216" E 21.21 4923-780 0.214 3555.598 21.209 N 00034144" W 172.72 4923.994 3576.807 172.711 -1.745 5096.705 3575.Q62 Closure in Lat/Dep: -0.002 -0.006 Starting Point: - 5096.703 - 3575.056 Distance Error: S 71033'54" W 0.006 Total Distance: 037.26 Accuracy Ratio: 1t69,140 Area: 9.066 it2 0.208 Acres 3 02/21/2088 14:30 4254325933 CRONES AND Aswu R:Ykojwft Fooff j#WbMwqp**4ANS0MAWARCEL A (OLD)-ptc rmur- Lot Closures - prepared using Survey/Civil solutions for AutoCAD Bearing Mode Date Prepared: 1/8/2008 Drawing: HMSO-03A-P(iELININARY BLA2-dwg Measurement Units: feet -_- ---------------------------------------------- JIM HMSON IAT LINE AD.7USW ENT RENTON PARCEL A (OLD) ------------ Bearing -- Distance Northing/16at Easting/Dep ------------- ------- ----------------------------- 5096.703 3575.056 Start (POB) N 00034144" W 91.06 91.856 -0.928 5198.559 3574.128 S 59"59106K w 193.50 -96.794 -167_550 5091.765 3406.570 S 59059,05" R 75.00 -37.517 -64-942 5054.248 3341.636 S 86019*24- E 144.22 -9.248 143.923 5045.000 3485.559 N 59059106" E 103.35 51-698 89.490 5096-690 3575.049 Closure in Lat/Dep: 0.005 0.007 Starting Point: ---~- ------ 5096.703 3515.056 Distance Error: N 54'27144" E 0.009 Total Distance: 607.94 Accuracy Ratio: I 70, 672 Area: 14,875 £t2 0:341 Acres 92/21/20W 14:30 4254325933 CRONM AND ASSIC P:Wp*ds FdWW&CAo )L0T 2-Pc rf � Zia Lot Closures - Prepared using Survey/Civil Solutions for AutoCAD Bearing Made Date Prepared: 1/8/2008 Drawing: HrANSO--03A-PRMIMIKARY BLA2-dwg Measurement Units: feet JIM HANSON LOT LINE ADJUSTMENT RENTON LOT 2 (NEW) - W Bearing 5 59°39'06" H South S 30600154" E s 30.00'54" Z N 09°25116" E Distance 102.28 92.40 60.00 80.00 21.21 N 00034144" N 264.58 C10sure in Lat/Dep: Starting Point: farthing/Lat 5188.563 -51.163 5137.400 -92,400 5045.000 -51- 954 4993.046 -69.272 4223.774 0.215 4923.989 264.566 5188.555 0.008 5188.563 Distance arror: N 26033'54" W 0.009 Total Distances 520.47 Accuracy Ratio: 1,69,370 Area: 17,292 ft2. 0.397 Acres Easting/Dep 3574.128 Start (POB) -88.563 3485.565 0.000 3495.565 30.0i3 3515,578 40.018 3555.596 21.209 3576.805 -2.673 3574.132 -0.004 3574.120 92/21/20M 14:30 4254325933 CRONES AND ASSOC PAGt 17[ P:kPro FjrjoCAD D vft* WANSO-O3AILOT 1.pW Lot Closures - Prepared using SurveytCioil Solati.ons for AutoCAD Searing Mode Date Prepared_ 1/8/2008 Drawing: HANSO-03A-PRELIMINASY b1 A2.dW9 Measurement Units: feet --------------------------------------------------- SIN! HANSON LOT LINE ADJUSTMENT FtENTON LOT 1 (NEW) ------------ Bearing Distance Northing/Lat Basting/Dep -3405 5137.399 563 Start (POB) S 59°99*OC" M 91.22 -45.631 -78.986 N 890031040 w 87.46 5091.768 1.448 3406.577 -87.445 S 30000.'540 E 45.00 5093.216 -38.965 3319.129 22.510 S 86`19124" E 144.22 5054.251 -9.248 3341.639 143.923 5045.003 3485.562 North 92.40 92.100 0.000 5137.403 3483.562 Closure in Lat/Dep: ------- -0.004 . 0.001 Starting Point. ""----- 5137.399 3485.563 Distance Errors 3 14°02111" E 0.004 Total Dist&uce: 460.30 Accuracy Ratio; 1:111,640 Area: 8,337 ft2 0,191 Acres Altman diver Associates, LLC IV 1 is -, c , n,r •,I,. l\ 1 <11' 1 February 19, 2008 Jim Hanson 17446 Mallard Cove Lane Mt. Vernon, WA 98274 i ll l.�.-I'.-.: _'', ;. I-'-• ��.��i" I-.Ilt I1S111111 ['lll.ki REt�N p�SID �E 1r� liilc•c liirr. AOA-3257 SUBJECT: Stream Study for Parcel 9564800136, Taylor Place NW, Renton, WA Dear Jim: On February 17, 20061 conducted a wetland and stream reconnaissance on the subject property utilizing the methodology outlined in the 1997 Washington State Wetlands Identification and Delineation Manual. The site is undeveloped and consisted primarily of a mix of deciduous trees and brush_ Although no wetlands were identified on the property, one small stream was observed flowing from west to east through the northern portion of the site (Drawing W1,1). The stream on the property is located within a well-defined channel (approximately two feet wide on average) at the bottom of a small ravine. A small surface flow was observed within the channel during the site visit and it is my understanding that the stream is seasonal and dry during the summer months. The upstream portion of the stream is culverted under Taylor Place NW and drains through Parcel 9564800185 before entering the subject property. Runoff within the stream then enters another culvert off -site to the east within the undeveloped right -of way for Taylor Ave. NW. Vegetation within the riparian corridor of the stream was forested and dominated by a canopy of big -leaf maple (Acer macrophyllum) with an understory of Himalayan blackberry (Rubes discolor), Indian plum (Oemleria cerasiformis), sword fern (Polystichum munitum), and English ivy (Hedera helix). The stream on the property is not mapped on the City of Renton's stream map (Figure 4-3-050Q4), but meets the criteria for a Class 4 stream since it does not contain salmonid habitat and is intermittent (RMC 4-3-050L.1a). Class 4 streams in the City of Renton require a standard 35-foot buffer from the ordinary high water of the stream channel (RMC 4-3-050L.5.a). Jim Hanson February 19, 2008 Page 2 Stream Buffer Averaging The project proposes to implement a buffer averaging and enhancement plan (Drawings W1.1, W2.1, and W2.2). Under this plan, 608 s.f. of stream buffer would be reduced and replaced with 608 s.f_ of additionaf stream buffer. In no case would the buffer be reduced below 25 feet. The proposed buffer reduction area is currently dominated by dense Himalayan blackberry, with scattered Indian plum. The proposed buffer replacement area consists primarily of a mix of periodically mowed lawn and blackberry. Due to the degraded condition of the proposed buffer replacement area, the area will be planted with a variety of native trees and shrubs to increase the plant species and structural diversity of the buffer. In addition, all clematis (an invasive vine) within the sloped portion of the buffer will be removed. Implementation of the buffer averaging plan should increase the value of the buffer over current conditions and should meet the buffer averaging criteria outlined in RMC 4-3-050L.5.d.iii. Fallowing implementation of the buffer enhancement plan, a split -rail fence would be installed along the buffer edge to prevent pedestrian intrusion. Goal, Objectives, and Performance Standards for Enhancement Area The primary goal of the enhancement plan is to increase the value of the buffer over current conditions. To meet this goal, the following objectives and performance standards have been incorporated into the design of the plan: Objective A: Increase the structural and plant species diversity within the enhancement area. Performance Standard. Following every monitoring event for a period of at least five years, the enhancement area will contain at least 6 native plant species. In addition, there will be 100% survival of all woody planted species throughout the enhancement area at the end of the first year of planting. Following Year 1, success will be based on an 80% survival rate or areal cover of planted or recolonized native species of 15% at construction approval, 20% after Year 1, 30% after Year 2, 40% after Year 3, 50% after Year 4 and 60% after Year 5_ Objective B: Limit the amount of invasive and exotic species within the enhancement area. Performance Standard. After construction and following every monitoring event for a period of at least five years, exotic and invasive plant species will be maintained at levels below 10% total cover in all planted areas. These species include, but are not limited to, Himalayan and evergreen blackberry, reed canarygrass, morning glory, Japanese knotweed, English ivy, thistle, and creeping nightshade. Construction Management Prior to commencement of any work in the enhancement area, the clearing limits will be staked and any existing vegetation to be saved will be clearly marked. A pre - construction meeting will be held at the site to review and discuss all aspects of the project with the landscape contractor and the owner. Jim Hanson February 19, 2008 Page 3 A consultant will supervise plan implementation during construction to ensure that objectives and specifications of the enhancement plan are met. Any necessary significant modifications to the design that occur as a result of unforeseen site conditions will be jointly approved by the City of Renton and the consultant prior to their implementation. Monitoring Methodology The monitoring program will be conducted for a period of five years, with quarterly reports during the first year and annual reports for Years 2 through 5. Based on the relatively small size of the enhancement area, the entire area will be reviewed. A record will be kept of all plant species found. Vegetation will be recorded on the basis of relative percent cover of the dominant species within the vegetative strata. Photo -points will be established from which photographs will be taken throughout the monitoring period. These photographs will document general appearance and progress in plant community establishment in the enhancement area. Review of the photos over time will provide a visual representation of success of the enhancement plan. Maintenance Plan Maintenance will be conducted on a routine, year round basis. Additional maintenance needs will be identified and addressed following periodic maintenance reviews. Contingency measures and remedial action on the site shall be implemented on an as - needed basis at the direction of the consultant or the owner. Weed Control Routine removal and control of non-native and other invasive plants (e.g., Himalayan and evergreen blackberry, Scot's broom, reed canarygrass, Japanese knotweed, English ivy, morning glory, thistle, clematis, and creeping nightshade) shall be performed by manual means whenever possible. Chemical means will only be Used if necessary. Undesirable and weedy exotic plant species shall be maintained at levels below 10% total cover within any given stratum at any time during the five- year monitoring period_ The following outlines treatment for specific species. Himalayan and Evergreen Blackberry Control Small patches (areas <3' x 3') need to be grubbed out, large areas (>3' x 3') need to be cut down. New shoots (approx. 6" in height) which reappear should be spot - sprayed with herbicide only if necessary and under the supervision of a consultant. General Maintenance Items Routine maintenance of planted trees shall be performed. Measures include resetting plants to proper grades and upright positions. Tall grasses and other competitive weeds shall be weeded at the base of plants to prevent engulfment. Weed control should be performed by; hand removal, installation of weed barrier cloth with mulch rings, or selective weed -whacking. If weed -whacking is performed, Jim Hanson February 19, 2008 Page 4 great care shall be taken to prevent damage to desired native species either planted or re -colonized. Woody plants shall only be pruned at the direction of the consultant or to remove pest infestations. Contingency Plan All dead plants will be replaced with the same species or an approved substitute species that meets the goal of the enhancement plan. Plant material shall meet the same specifications as originally -installed material. Replanting will not occur until after reason for failure has been identified (e.g., moisture regime, poor plant stock, disease, shade/sun conditions, wildlife damage, etc.). Replanting shall be completed under the direction of the consultant, City of Renton, or the owner. As -Built Plan Following completion of construction activities, an as -built plan for the enhancement area will be provided to the City of Renton. The plan will identify and describe any changes in relation to the original approved plan. If you have any questions please call me at (425) 333-4535. Sincerely, ALTMANN OLIVER ASSOCIATES, LLC YA_ awj-t� John Altmann Ecologist DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DIVISION ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST City of Renton Development Services Division y - p� RE CN 1055 South Grady Way, Renton, WA 98055 Phone: 425-430-7200 Fax: 425-430-7231 PURPOSE OF CHECKLIST: '�'�rF� The State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA), Chapter 43.21C RCW, requires all governmental agencies to consider the environmental impacts of a proposal before making decisions_ An Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) must be prepared for all proposals with probable significant adverse impacts on the quality of the environment. The purpose of this checklist is to provide information to help you and the agency identify impacts from your proposal (and to reduce or avoid impacts from the proposal, if it can be done) and to help the agency decide whether an EIS is required. INSTRUCTIONS FOR APPLICANTS: This environmental checklist asks you to describe some basic information about your proposal. Governmental agencies use this checklist to determine whether the environmental impacts of your proposal are significant, requiring preparation of an EIS_ Answer the questions briefly, with the most precise information known, or give the hest description you can_ You must answer each question accurately and carefully, to the best of your knowledge. In most cases, you should be able to answer the questions from your own observations or project plans without the need to hire experts. If you really do not know the answer, or if a question does not apply to your proposal, write "do not know" or "does not apply"_ Complete answers to the questions now may avoid unnecessary delays later. Some questions ask about governmental regulations, such as zoning, shoreline, and landmark designations. Answer these questions if you can. If you have problems, the governmental agencies can assist you_ The checklist questions apply to all parts of your proposal, even if you plan to do them over a period of time or on different parcels of land. Attach any additional information that will help describe your proposal or its environmental effects. The agency to which you submit this checklist may ask you to explain your answers or provide additional information reasonably related to determining if there may be significant adverse impact. USE OF CHECKLIST FOR NONPROJECT PROPOSALS: Complete this checklist for nonproject proposals, even though questions may be answered "does not apply." IN ADDITION, complete the SUPPLEMENTAL SHEET FOR NONPROJECT ACTIONS (part D). For nonproject actions (actions involving decisions on policies, plans and programs), the references in the checklist to the words "project," "applicant," and "property or site" should be read as "proposal," "proposer," and "affected geographic area," respectively. http:l/rentonwa.gOvIUPWdedFiles/BusinessIPBPWtDEVSERVIFORMS_PIANN I NGlenvo Ist. doc02104108 A. BACKGROUND 1. Name of proposed project, if applicable: TA Q( L�oR pL . L. L-A 2. Name of applicant: 4— ' /__ 4-C' 3. Address and phone number of applicant and contact person: F2 �G y>-, A D C,�i' 4. Date checklist prepared: Z, . q -o c3 5. Agency requesting checklist: C l TY F C tilTC�h� 6. Proposed timing or schedule (including phasing, if applicable): 5 pk A_Je-5 Z cDeD S 7. Do you have any plans for future additions, expansion, or further activity related to or connected with this proposal? If yes, explain. t_L A Z E?Ly,J TS 8. List any environmental information you know about that has been prepared, or will be prepared, directly related to this proposal. TR D �g, r'}T�c�,� 4 SQ F F-& R__ 6- R G- Po 1;;;,, T-, 9. Do you know whether applications are pending for governmental approvals of other proposals directly affecting the property covered by your proposal? If yes, explain. /JG 10. List any governmental approvals or permits that will be needed for your proposal, if known. FLzI4v'A'6, P'�RM I - 5 11. Give brief, complete description of your proposal, including the proposed uses and the size of the project and site. vfi5 ,-,v 7-o 2 177G R t= VV_rS - fib" STX" e T�df-J o f-Ivuses;, DA.'Z_�7 cAj t V Ew L-O t5. http://rentonwa_gov/uploadedFiles/Business/PBPWIDEVSERVIFORMS PLANNINGienvchlst.doe 2 12. Location of the proposal. Give sufficient information for a person to understand the precise location of your proposed project, including a street address, if any, and section, township, and range if known. If a proposal would occur over a range of area, provide the range or boundaries of the site(s). Provide a legal description, site plan, vicinity map, and topographic map, if reasonably available. While you should submit any plans required by the agency, you are not required to duplicate maps or detailed plans submitted with any permit applications related to this checklist. S co }% , 5 C '7, `t-oi a z- 3 V, F2, 5 L 1. n A. 1-4 1< A� "j, Rg� Aca--C_*0 . ✓\ 5 � � � rlc H I '25a4Z� B. ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS 1. EARTH a. General description of the site (circle one); at; oiling, hilly step eslldpes,, mountainous, other ?bp' ' C'x ar+� ls'� . - - � , T b. What is the steepest slope on the site (approximate percent slope?) C. What general types of soils are found on the site (for example, clay, sand, rave peat, muck)? If you know the classification of agricultural soils, specify them an note any prime farmland, ,� � _5 �i6Pc�r--T ,};Y,} d. Are there surface indications or history of unstable soils in the immediate vicinity? If so, describe. N,, r : , r,,E�- ,-Be,.-t- A Fe 01 C,c."-- s T if s A/o2:T ti . e. Describe the purpose, type, and approximate quantities of any filling or grading proposed. Indicate source of fill. , � � � ,, 4 f. Could erosion occur as a result of clearing, construction, or use? If so, generally describe. �/ T�v.�• �araez SiCrc� C,� f� L t' GoT,I 5=rr>^J�Aa7P5 CijtrL X I�Rc�u,��'a7. g. About what percent of the site will be covered with impervious surfaces after project construction (for example, asphalt or buildings)? l 3 /,' h. Proposed measures to reduce or control erosion, or other impacts to the earth, if any: http:Jlrentonwa.govluploadedFilesiBusinessIPBPW1DEVSERV/FORMS_PLANNING/envchist.doc 3 2. AIR a. What types of emissions to the air would result from the proposal (i.e., dust, automobile, odors, industrial wood smoke) during construction and when the project is completed? If any, generally describe and give approximate quantities if known.„�� b. Are there any off -site sources of emission or odor that may affect your proposal? If so, generally describe. C. Proposed measures to reduce or control emissions or other impacts to air, if any: Al Olo 15 3. WATER a. Surface Water: 1) Is there any surface water body on or in the immediate vicinity of the site (including year- round and seasonal streams, saltwater, lakes, ponds, wetlands)? If yes, describe type and provide names. If appropriate, state what stream or river it flows into. a N,4,4 .1 wD 2) Will the project require any work over, in, or adjacent to (within 200 feet) the described waters? If yes, please describe and attach available plans. ;4 �-5. No uJor,,k 3) Estimate the amount of fill and dredge material that would be placed in or removed from surface water or wetlands and indicate the area of the site that would be affected. Indicate the source of fill material. AJ O " 4:5 4) Will the proposal require surface water withdrawals or diversions? Give general description, purpose, and approximate quantities if known. /JO 5) Does the proposal lie within a 100-year flood plain? If so, note location on the site plan. IK4a 6) Does the proposal involve any discharges of waste materials to surface waters? If so, x describe the type of waste and anticipated volume of discharge. /'4a http: //rentonwa, gov/upioadedFiiestBusines$IPBPWIDE VSERVtFORMS_PI ANNINGlenvr-hlst.doe 4 b. Ground Water: 1) Will ground water be withdrawn, or will water be discharged to ground water? Give general description, purpose, and approximate quantities if known. Na 2) Describe waste material that will be discharged into the ground from septic tanks or other sources, if any (for example: Domestic sewage; industrial, containing the following chemicals...; agricultural; etc.). Describe the general size of the system, the number of such systems, the number of houses to be served (if applicable), or the number of animals or humans the system(s) are expected to serve. Iq 0 /U ►E C. Water Runoff (including storm water): 1} Describe the source of runoff (including storm water) and method of collection and disposal, if any (include quantities, if known). Where will this water flow? Will this water flow into other waters, If so, describe. 5-Tart „-, w ;?-- w I L i- 3E= jti'rr&-rE-p ins S'J^t'Z�!. �rcr► i�ucs s f�'rz�� wf��5. 2) Could waste material enter ground or surface waters? If so, generally describe. AJG d. Proposed measures to reduce or control surface, ground, and runoff water impacts, if any: /V;,.0 a 4. PLANTS a. Check or circle types of vegetation found on the site: k deciduous tree: alder ap aspen, other evergreen tree fi ceda pine, other shrubs rass pasture crop or grain wet soil plants: cattail, buttercup, bullrush, skunk cabbage, other water plants: water lily, eel grass, milfoil, other other types of vegetation b. What kind and amount of vegetation will be removed or altered? / N -t 14 e= A-JZ s,A5 ;-a pz JU C--w C. List threatened or endangered species known to be on or near the site. AAG A-) a d. Proposed landscaping, use of native plants, or other measures to preserve or enhance vegetation on the site, if any: 3 a'r- L D r r- c, T C http:Nrentonwa.govluploadedFilesiBusinesstPBPW/DEVSERVIFORMS—PLANNING/envehist.doc 5 5. ANIMALS a. Circle any birds and animals which have been observed on or near the site or are known to be on or near the site: Birds: hawk, heron, eagle, songbirds they Mammals: deer, bear, elk, eaver, other Fish: bass, salmon, trout, herring, shellfish, other b. List any threatened or endangered species known to be on or near the site. JU ej .v c C. is the site part of a migration route? If so, explain /at-- d. Proposed measures to preserve or enhance wildlife, if any: 140 6. ENERGY AND NATURAL RESOURCES a. What kinds of energy (electric, natural gas, oil, wood stove, solar) will be used to meet the completed project's energy needs? Describe whether it will be used for heating, manufacturing, etc. �,c.�k� sue- r, 4,,v r e5 I"-�&-,er5 b. Would your project affect the potential use of solar energy by adjacent properties? If so, generally describe. ,jc, C. What kinds of energy conservation features are included in the plans of this proposal? List other proposed measures to reduce or control energy impacts, if any: r. /fs/v. S7RT.z= -0 UZ5- 7. ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH a. Are there any environmental health hazards, including exposure to toxic chemicals, risk of fire and explosion, spill, or hazardous waste, that could occur as a result of this proposal? If so, describe. ILfE,,�,aF 1) Describe special emergency services that might be required_ r Jo.0 -a 2) Proposed measures to reduce or control environmental health hazards, if any: IVO A-1 kE http:llrentonwa.govluploadedFilesIBusinessIPBPW/DEVSERVIFORMS PLANNING/envchist.doc 6 b. Noise 9) What types of noise exist in the area which may affect your project (for example: traffic, equipment, operation, other)? �F ,G �q,J �,uc� ��, � Al e- f } 1 �+ P a a `i, 2) What types and levels of noise would be created by or associated with the project on a short-term or a long-term basis (for example: traffic, construction, operation, other)? Indicate what hours noise would come from the site. ,,Ir 3) Proposed measures to reduce or control noise impacts, if any: ado A_, 8. LAND AND SHORELINE USE a. What is the current use of the site and adjacent properties? If f3C.�i�y" b. Has the site been used for agriculture? If so, describe. rkj c, C. Describe any structures on the site. lu o,v d. Will any structures be demolished? If so, what? Nov � e. What is the current zoning classification of the site? A-G f. What is the current comprehensive plan designation of the site? g. If applicable, what is the current shoreline master program designation of the site? IV 44 h. Has any part of the site been classified as an "environmentally sensitive" area? If so, specify. Step_ tr A>,-L i_ Approximately how many people wouldresideor work in the completed project? A/ A 3 Z / �GP ri 1 ] http://rentonwa.gov/uploadedFilesIBusinewPBPW/DEVSERVIFORMS PLANNINGlenvchist,doc 7 j. Approximately how many people would the completed project displace? Al c�.0 k. Proposed measures to avoid or reduce displacement impacts, if any: NCA-,45 1_ Proposed measures to ensure the proposal is compatible with existing and projected land uses and plans, if any: �,,��* C rTc, cc,�:) 5 9. HOUSING a. Approximately how many units would be provided, if any? Indicate whether high, middle, or low-income housing. z. " A-P rt5 a n zm e & / xJe�wwr ,O -4 5 b. Approximately how many units, if any, would be eliminated? Indicate whether high, middle, or low-income housing. /J c. Proposed measures to reduce or control housing impacts, if any: 01'o - 10. AESTHETICS a. What is the tallest height of any proposed structure(s), not including antennas, what is the principal exterior building material(s) proposed. Z.3,, - e ;:pr�' b. What views in the immediate vicinity would be altered or obstructed? /k;00_,.e c. Proposed measures to reduce or control aesthetic impacts, if any: sV'0A) C 11. LIGHT AND GLARE a. What type of light or glare will the proposal produce? What time of day would it mainly occur? /UD jU,�F b. Could light or glare from the finished project be a safety hazard or interfere with views? A/0 http:/lrentonwa.gov/uploadedFiles/BusineWPBPW/DEVSERV/FORMS_PLANN I NG/envehist. doc 8 C. What existing off -site sources of light or glare may affect your proposal? A' cw.o-z_- d. Proposed measures to reduce or control light and glare impacts, if any: /"/o'U'�_:: 12. RECREATION a. What designated and informal recreational opportunities are in the immediate vicinity? Xl&ivy b, Would the proposed project displace any existing recreational uses? If so, describe. Ili if> C. Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts on recreation, including recreation opportunities to be provided by the project or applicant, if any: �)(-)r,�6� 13. HISTORIC AND CULTURAL PRESERVATION a. Are there any places or objects listed on, or proposed for, national state, or local preservation registers known to be on or next to the site? If so, generally describe. Alp b. Generally describe any landmarks or evidence of historic, archaeological, scientific, or cultural importance known to be on or next to the site. C. Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts, if any: 14. TRANSPORTATION a. Identify public streets and highways serving the site, and describe proposed access to the existing street system. Show on site plans, if any. ,�-t- / ' �O f5 eAl ray n P4. Nw 1--Rox-, / 1. T �z l C.caf3 ,OE" "Ou R/v b. Is site currently served by public transit? If not, what is the approximate distance to the nearest transit stop? y C 5 C. How many parking spaces would the completed project have? How many would the project eliminate? Z Fj�,A _.,=ACt4 http:llrentonw2.govluploadedFilesIBusinessiPBPWiDEVSERV/FORMS PLANNINGlenvchlst,doc 9 Will the proposal require any new roads or streets, or improvements to existing roads or streets, not including driveways? If so, generally describe (indicate whether pblic or private? VA)1_c1 A *FL,)Ri vc cv c� r.t1 tt A IA-3 7-He lYOu c. _FAcl t-Pra /70 ,ez- FA Fi e. Will the project use (or occur in the immediate vicinity of) water, rail, or air transportation? If so, generally describe. V,, How many vehicular trips per day would be generated by the completed project? If known, indicate when peak volumes would occur. q, •;� Fc„e EAcc �4 I-1L'K't�'-"—� g. Proposed measures to reduce or control transportation impacts, if any: "wArC Is. PUBLIC SERVICES a. Would the project result in an increased need for public services (for example: fire protection, police protection, health care, schools, other)? If so, generally describe. TWO Proposed measures to reduce or control direct impacts on public services, if any. 16. UTILITIES a. Circle-uWties curr'eM4-available at the site: lectrici natural ga water refuse service, telephon anitary sewer, lrseptic system, other. Describe the utilities that are proposed for the project, the utility providing the service, and the general construction activities on the site or in the immediate vicinity which might be needed. 4OL-_Y,1zE- C. SIGNATURE 1, the undersigned, state that to the best of my knowledge the above information is true and complete, It is understood that the lead agency may withdraw any declaration of non -significance that it might issue in reliance upon this checklist should there be any willful misrepresentation or willful lack of full disclosure on my part. Proponent: Name Printed:' Date: 2- - -2-. O -- 0.8 http://rentonwa.govluploadedFilesIBusinessJPBPWIDEVSERVIFORMS PLANNINGlenvchlst.doc 10 SUBSURFACE EXPLORATION and GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING RECOMENDATIONS PROPOSED SINGLE-FAMIILY RESIDENCE TAYLOR PLACE NW PROPERTY RENTON, WASHINGTON KING CO. TAX PARCEL NO.: 9564800136 prepared for: MR. JAMES HANSON 17446 MALLARD COVE LANE MT. VERNON, WASHINGTON by: BERGQUIST ENGINEERING SERVICES BES PROJECT NUMBER. 200717-REPORT 1 May 31, 2007 Bergqu:ist Engineering Service's Bergquist Engineering Services 27207 8th Avenue S RO. Box 13309 Des Moines, Washington 98198 Des Moines, Washington 98198 Phone: 253.941 .9399, Fax: 253,941 .9499, e-mail: RBergqu5l0�aol.com May 31, 2007 Mr. James C. Hanson 17446 Mallard Cove Lane Mt. Vernon, Washington 98274 Re: Subsurface Exploration and Geotechnical Engineering Recommendations Proposed Single -Family Residence Taylor Place NW Property Renton, Washington King County Tax Parcel Numbers: 9564800136 BES Project Number: 200717, Report 1 DearJim: Bergquist Engineering Services is pleased to provide this report of the geotechnical exploration and engineering analysis for the referenced project. The attached report summarizes proiect and site data, describes the services we performed, and presents analysis of the stability of the steep slopes, recommendations for: steep -slope buffers, building foundations, lateral earth pressures, and earthwork. Appendix A presents a map and site plan drawing showing the location of the project and of the test boring followed by explanatory aids. Appendix B presents the computer printouts of the slope stability analysis. We appreciate the opportunity to be of service to you. If you have any questions concerning this report, or if we may be of additional service, please contact us. A. BrRC WASw%Vt`is. _ 5/ li W0377 r�4 do £G1STIE s"lo N A G NCB) EXPIRES: July 1 S Copies to: Addressee (5) Sincerely, Bergquist Engineering .Services Richard A. Bergquist, P.E. Principal GFGTFCHNrrA, FNGINFFRlNG AND CGN+STRUCDON NNSPLCTION TABLE OF CONTENTS )' ` ]. INTRODUCTION .......... .............................................................. ...................... I � 2 ' ' P�[�|�[]' [}��{��PT�� . . —~ ' ----�--'�—' --'�----�----'--�'—^'��--'� 2 / 3. SCOPE OF SERVICES ................................... 2 ) 4. SITE CHARACTERIZATION ................................................................... .............. 2 ' 4.1 Site Classification ................ ....................................................................... 3 \ 4.2 ' —''—'�—'�-------'�------'�—''�--�----''--'��--'�� 3 4.3 Subsurface Soil and Gnoundwmhar—..---.----------------.. 4 / 5. { DISCUSSION .................................................................................................... .. 4 6. RECOMMENDATIONS ..................................................... .................................. 5 ' �) 6.1 Slope Stability ....................................................................... ' 5 / 6.1.1 Stability of Slopes mtthe Time Foundations are Excavated ------ 5 6.1.2 Stability pfSlopes at Completion of the Building ............................... 6 6'2 Foundations ................................................................................................ 6 6.3 Lateral Earth Prmsauras----------------------.----.. 7 � 6.4 S/"b"-pn-Gnode-------..—...—.--....--------.-------. 8 6.5 Eorth"""~k.................................................................................................. 8 6.5.1 Site Clearing ....-----.-------------..--..---- 8 6.5.2 Excovotipn----'----^------.—.---------^—.. g 6.5.3 Foundation Pnaponation----..—.--------.-------- 9 6.5.4 Materials ....................................................................... ............... 9 6.5.5 Placement and Cornpuctkzn..-------------..----- 10 6.6 Drainage ......................................................................... ......................... 11 6.7 Gnzundvvuter-------.----^--------'-----.----.. ] ] 6.8 Erosion---------------------------------- ] ] 6.9 Construction Observation and Teoting.--------.---'--.---- 12 | 7. REPORT LIMITATIONS --..------.—^--------^--------..— 12 APPENDIX VicinityMap ................ ................................................................................ ...... —f\l SitePlan ................. —..... .......... ... ............... ........... ................ —............ A2 TABLE OF CONTENTS BoringLog ........................................................................................................ A BoringLog Notes....................................................................................................... A4 Unified Soil Classification System .......... Schematic of Perimeter Drain...................................................................................... A7 APPENDIX B Computer Printouts of Slope Stability Analyses.............................................................. Bl Notes .. B23 SUBSURFACE EXPLORATION and GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING RECOMENDATIONS PROPOSED SINGLE-FAMIILY RESIDENCE TAYLOR PLACE NW PROPERTY RENTON, WASHINGTON KING CO. TAX PARCEL NO.: 9564800136 prepared for: MR. JAMES HANSON 17446 MALLARD COVE LANE MT. VERNON, WASHINGTON 98274 by: Y BERGQUIST ENGINEERING SERVICES BES PROJECT NUMBER: 200717-REPORT i May 31, 2007 1. INTRODUCTION This report presents the results of our geotechnical evaluation for the proposed single-family residence on the roughly 0.51 acre lot at about 456 Taylor Place NW. The site is situated between Taylor Place NW and an unpaved extension of Taylor Avenue NW. The location of the project site is shown on the Vicinity Map on page Al in Appendix A of this report. This report is intended to provide information or recommendations regarding: • Stability of the steep slopes during construction and at completion of the project, • seismic design considerations including liquefaction potential, allowable bearing capacity and depth of suitable foundation systems with estimated settlements, + lateral earth pressures and friction coefficients, influence of groundwater on the development, a drainage, • site preparation, earthwork, and excavation -slope considerations. Proposed Taylor Noce Single-F iiy Residence B oject Number. 200717, Report 1 Renton, Washington May 31, 2007 Mr. James Hanson authorized our work based on BES Proposal Number 1172007 dated March 22, 2007. 2. PROJECT DESCRIPTION The development includes construction of a two story, wood -framed, single-family residence near the southeast corner of the property. Access to the house will be provided from the west off of Taylor Place NW. Actual wall and column loads were not available at this time, therefore, I have assumed a maximum wall load of 4 kips per lineal foot and a maximum column load of 100 kips. If the actual foundation loads are greater than those stated herein, the geotechnical engineer must be notified to determine whether the recommendations presented herein require revision. 3. SCOPE OF SERVICES The scope of services included a reconnaissance of the site by the geotechnical engineer; a review of readily available geologic literature; drilling, logging, and sampling one test boring; laboratory testing of the soil samples; engineering analysis; and preparation of this report. The approximate location of the one boring is shown on the SITE PLAN presented on page A2 in Appendix A of this report. Soil samples were taken at the intervals noted on the individual boring log, which is presented on page A3 in the Appendix of this report. The soil samples were returned to our laboratory for analysis that included visual classification of each sample. The field and laboratory data were then evaluated by the geotechnical engineer relative to the proposed construction. The engineering recommendations and advice presented in this report have been made in accordance with generally accepted geotechnicol-engineering practices in the area. 4. SITE CHARACTERIZATION The information presented in this section was gathered by BES personnel for geotechnical engineering purposes only. This site characterization was not intended to address the presence or likelihood of contamination on or around the site. Specialized methods and Bergquist Engineering Services Page 2 of 12 Proposed Taylor Place Single-i ily Residence f " roject Number. 200717, Report 1 Renton, Washington May 31, 2D07 procedures, which were not a part of this scope of services, are required for an adequate environmental site assessment. 4.1 Site Classification A small portion of the very northeast corner of Parcel Number 9564800136 is designated as an "erosion hazard area" by King County. The extreme west side of the site is mapped as ❑ moderate landslide hazard and the east side of the site is mapped as an erosion hazard by the City of Renton. The City of Renton Hazard Maps do not show any coal mining activity at the site. According to Table 1615.1.1 of the IBC (International Building Code), soils underlying the terrace remnants meet the criteria outlined for Site Class D1 (International Code Council, 2003b). In these areas, seismically induced settlement of the foundation soils may occur; however, such settlement will be minimal and will probably affect relatively large areas, so that differential settlements over the short foundation distances associated with this project will likely be small. Due to the grain size distribution, relative density, and lack of groundwater, the subsurface soils in these areas are not susceptible to liquefaction. 4.2 Surface There is approximately 50 feet of vertical relief on the property, from a low elevation of approximately 85 feet MSL (mean sea level) at the bottom of the drainage near the northeast corner of the property, to a high elevation of approximately 130 feet MSL near the northwest corner of the property, based on the topographic map that you provided. The property consists of a bench (terrace) that slopes gently to the east at an inclination of approximately 15 to 20 percent. The bench slopes down to a drainage channel that runs along the north boundary of the property. Channel side slopes generally range in inclination from 55 to 60 percent. Water was flowing in the north channel at the time of drilling. Slopes on the property are generally planar. Bergquist Engineering Services Page 3 of 12 Proposed Taylor Place Single-F �ly Residence B oject Number: 200/17, Report 1 Renton, Washington May 31, 2D07 4.3 Subsurface Soil and Groundwater The subsurface soil and groundwater conditions at this site are described in the following paragraphs and are presented graphically on the boring log attached to this report. The stratification lines, indicated on the boring log, represent the approximate boundaries between soil types. Actual boundaries may be gradual and the transitions may not be easily discernible during site excavation. In general, the site is covered with a thin (about four inches thick) layer of topsoil consisting of brown to dark brown, loose Sandy -SILT (SM) with organic matter. Underlying the topsoil, intermittent layers of predominantly coarse -grained soils were encountered that consist of SAND j (SP), GRAVEL -SAND (GP), and SAND -SILT (SM). The relative density of these soils ranges from medium dense to very dense as indicated by the Standard Penetration Tests (N-Values). r Groundwater was not encountered in the boring. Note that groundwater readings in granular soils, such as those encountered on this site, ore generally accurate even after short periods of observation. Whereas, the groundwater level in fine-grained (silt and clay) soils may require several days of observation before it becomes stable and accurate. 5. DISCUSSION The recommendations presented in this report are based on our understanding of the project as presented in the Project Description Section and on the assumption that the subsurface conditions encountered in the boring adequately represent conditions elsewhere on -site. Because project conditions regarding type and location of structures and foundation loads can change and because subsurface conditions are not always similar to those encountered in the borings, the geotechnical engineer must be contacted for review and possible revision of the I recommendations if discrepancies are noticed. IBergquist Engineering Services Page 4 of 12 Proposed Taylor Place Single-F ' y Residence Renton, Washington BF_ - )led dumber, 200717, Report 1 May 3l , 2007 6. RECOMMENDATIONS Challenges for this project include the relatively small building pad caused by the steep slopes that flank the proposed building site. The following sections present the evaluation of the steep slopes on the site and recommendations for the foundations, lateral earth pressures, slabs -on -grade, and for earthwork, excavations, drainage, and groundwater. 6.1 Slope Stability The following sections present the estimated factors of safety of the existing slopes in their condition during the excavation for the footings, with and without earthquake loads, and after construction, with and without earthquake loads. A horizontal acceleration of 0.20g was used in the analyses when earthquake loads were considered. The engineering properties of the subsurface soils used in the stability analysis are presented in Table 6.1. These values are based on the results of the Standard Penetration Tests, visual classification, laboratory tests, the geotechnicai engineer's experience, and on the publication entitled Geotechnical Properties of Geologic Materials by .ion W. Koloski, Sigmund D. Schwartz, and Donald W. Tubbs. TABLE 6.1: ENGINEERING PROPERTIES USED IN STABILITY ANALYSIS CROSS SECTION AA", THROUGH BORING 1, AZIMUTH 1820 Depth Range of Moist Unit Saturated Angle of Internal SOIL Cohesion (C) Soil Unit Weight Unit Weight Friction (0) UNIT ( PA (ft) (pcf) (pcf) (degrees) 1 B 1, 0-3 1/2 125 134 0 35 2 B 1, 3112-7 135 140 0 41 3 B 1, 7-16 133 139 0 39 4 B 1, 16-26 135 140 0 41 6.1.1 Stability of Slopes at the Time the Foundation Excavations are Completed: Stability analyses were performed on a cross section through Boring 1 on an azimuth of 182 degrees. The estimated minimum factors of safety for the existing slope are summarized below in Table Bergquis# Engineering Services Page 5 of 12 Proposed Taylor Place Single-F, - y Residence B r ;ject Number. 200717, Report 1 Renton, Washington May 31, 2007 6.2 and the computer printouts are presented on pages B1 through 1310 in Appendix B of this report. TABLE 6.2: ESTIMATED MINIMUM FACTORS OF SAFETY DURING CONSTRUCTION Cross Section Without Earthquake Loads With Earthquake Loads A -A' Through B1, 1,938 1.215 Azimuth 182° 6.1.2 Stability of Slopes at the Completion of the Building: The slope was modeled at the completion of the building with, and without earthquake loads using a 600 psf load over the footprint of the proposed two-story home building. The program was instructed to calculate the FOS for 1600 potential shear surfaces during each iteration -� using one of the described methods. The attached input data and graphs (See pages 1311 through B22) show the locations of the weakest surface analyzed within the slope segment selected for analysis, with the surface having the lowest FOS highlighted. The estimated factors of safety are summarized below in Table 6.3. TABLE 6.3: ESTIMATED MINIMUM FACTORS OF SAFETY AT COMPLETION OF THE BUILDING Cross Section Without Earthquake Loads With Earthquake Loads A -A' Through B1, 1.938 1.215 Azimuth 182° Conservative shear strength values were used in the analysis resulting in acceptable estimated safety factors. Accordingly, the site is suitable for the planned development. A minimum buffer of 10 feet between the edge of the footing and the face of the steep slope is recommended. 6.2 Foundations Conventional spread footing foundations may be used to support the proposed single-family residence. Spread footing (continuous wall and individual column) foundations may be dimensioned using a net allowable bearing capacity of up to 3,000 psf if they are placed in organic -free, undisturbed, medium dense to dense SAND (SP) or GRAVEL -SAND (GP) encountered at a depth greater than two feet below existing grade. IBergquist Engineering Services Page 6 of 12 Proposed Taylor Place Singie-r ly Residence B olect Number. 200717, Report 1 Renton, Washington May 31, 2007 The recommended minimum dimension for continuous wall footings is 18 inches and for individual column footings, the recommended minimum dimension is 24 inches. All perimeter footings must be placed at least 18 inches below finished grade for frost protection. All interior footings shall be embedded at least 12 inches below the adjacent grade. The allowable bearing capacities may be increased by one-third for wind and seismic loads. If the recommendations in this report are followed, total post construction settlement of the foundation will be less than one inch (i inch) with differential settlements of less than three- quarters of an inch (3/4-inch). 6.3 Lateral Earth Pressures Any below -grade, foundation or retaining walls with unbalanced backfiil will be subjected to lateral earth pressures. All backfiil soils shall be free -draining, granular soils and the walls shall be well -drained with a perimeter drain system to prevent development of hydrostatic pressures. Lateral earth pressures for design of foundations, stem walls, and short retaining walls with level backfiil and without hydrostatic pressures or surcharge loads, may be calculated using the equivalent fluid pressures presented below. The seismic loads must be combined with the static loads for design for earthquake events: STATIC Acting H/3 up From Bottom Active: Undisturbed subsoils 35 psf/ft Compacted granular soils 45 psf/ft STATIC Passive: Continuous footings 360 psf/ft. Column footings 360 psf/ft. SEISMIC Acting 0.6H up From Bottom 22 psf/ft. 23 psf/ft. SEISMIC At Rest: Compacted granular soils 65 psf/ft. 33 psf/ft. Note: Use at -rest pressures if the rotation of the wall is restricted to 0.002 times its height or less. Bergquist Engineering Services Page 7 of 12 Proposed Taylor Noce Single-i y Residence BF )iect Number: 200/ 1 1, Report 1 Renton, WasNngion May 31, 2007 A coefficient of friction between footings and bearing soils of 0.35 may be used to resist lateral foundation loads. If passive earth pressures are used in conjunction with base friction to resist lateral loads, reduce the ultimate coefficient of friction to 0.30. Footings, stem walls, below -grade walls, and retaining walls must be reinforced to reduce the potential for distress caused by differential foundation movements. A qualified engineer must determine the size, quantity, and location of reinforcement. The geotechnicaI engineer shall inspect all footing excavations at this site prior to placement of construction forms and reinforcement steel. 6.4 Slabs -on -Grade Slabs -on -grade should be supported on a minimum four -inch thick, free -draining sand or f gravel base that follows gradation and compaction recommendations provided in Table 6.5 of this report. All concrete, especially slabs -on -grade, should be placed at minimum water - cement ratios on moistened surfaces and properly cured to minimize shrinkage, cracking, warping, and curling. Concrete slabs should be allowed to cure adequately before subjecting them to full design loads. Any concrete that will be exposed to the elements should be entrained with four to six percent air to minimize damage from freeze -thaw cycles Place heavy polyethylene sheeting on the granular base to act as a vapor retarder beneath interior, concrete slobs -on -grade. A two- to four -inch thick layer of sand maybe placed over the vapor barrier to improve concrete curing. If provided, floor coverings should not be placed until the concrete floor has cured sufficiently. 6.5 Earthwork The recommendations presented in this report are predicated on fulfillment of the following earthwork recommendations. 6.5.1 Site Clearing: Within the construction area, remove trees, tree stumps, shrubs, ground cover, and topsoil to a sufficient depth to remove roots in excess of one-half inch in diameter. Shape the site to a flat, near -level surface with a slight gradient to allow surface runoff. Excavate and remove any soft or loose areas and replace with structural backfill approved by the geotechnical engineer. Bergquisi Engineering Services Page 8 of 12 Proposed Taylor Pioce Single-i= 'ly Residence B-r " oled Number. 200717, Report 1 Renton, Washington May 31, 2007 6.5.2 Excavation: Conventional -excavating equipment should be suitable for the proposed excavations. Shallow excavations (up to four feet in depth) will stand open for short periods of time with vertical side slopes for short durations; however, according to Chapter 296-155- 66401 of the Sate Standards for Construction Work in the State of Washington, the site soils classify as Type C. Therefore, side slopes of excavations deeper than four (4) feet must be no steeper than one to one (1.5H:1V)_ If the dimensions of the site prevent the use of maximum slopes of 1.5H:1V, the slopes must be stabilized or shored to facilitate safe excavations_ The geotechnical engineer must be contacted for additional recommendations if such techniques are going to be employed. Because of the granular nature of the site soils, rockeries in excess of four feet in height with level back -slopes are not recommended. ' 6.5.3 Foundation Preparation: Specialized treatment of the foundation soils is not anticipated. All foundation excavations must be made carefully so as not to disturb the bearing soils. Preferably, the footing excavations shall be completed with a toothless bucket on the excavator. If unsuitable soils are encountered at the footing elevation, contact the geotechnical engineer for evaluation. 6.5.4 Materials: The on -site soils within anticipated excavation depths are predominantly SAND and GRAVEL -SAND. These soils are generally suitable for use as structural fill and structural backfill. Any organic -rich soils encountered on -site may only be used in landscape or non-structural areas. If additional soil is needed for structural fill or backfill to meet design grades, it shall be imported and conform to the gradation presented in Table 6.5 and be approved by the geotechnical engineer prior to use. Samples must be submitted to the geotechnical engineer at least 72 hours before approval is required and before the materials are used. Gravel base and select materials for pavement subgrade must conform to local governmental standards, such as City of Renton, King County, State of Washington, or other suitable specifications approved by the geotechnical engineer. Bergquist Engineering Services Page 9 of 12 i'roposed I ayior Place Jingle-r y Residence b ' oject Number: 200/ l I, Report I Renton, Washington May 3l , 2007 TABLE 6.5 GRADATION RFQIJIRFMENTS FOR STRl1CTURAI FII I U.S. Standard Sieve Percent Passing 3-inch 100 3/4-inch 50-100 '/d-inch 25-75 No. 10 10-50 No. 40 0-20 No. 200 0-5* -Note: I he percent passing the No. 2UU sieve is based on the weight of the material passing the 3/4-inch sieve. If building construction is performed during the wet season, a granular base or work blanket will be required at the entrance and egress areas of the site. Granular materials used as a work blanket should conform to the gradation presented in Table 6.6, and be approved by the geotechnical engineer prior to use. TABLE 6.6 GRADATION RFQl1IRFMFNT., FOR WOPI( l31 ANICFT U.S. Standard Sieve Percent Passin 4-inch 100 3/4-inch 20 No. 200 5 maximum* *Note: The percent passing the No. 200 sieve is based on the weight of the material passing the 3/4-inch sieve. 6.5.5 Placement and Compaction: Except for backfill behind retaining walls, all other structural fill and structural backfill materials shall be placed in relatively horizontal loose lifts I not exceeding10 inches in thickness and compacted to at least 95 p percent of the modified Proctor (ASTM D1557) maximum density at moisture contents within two (2) percent of optimum. The specified compacted density and moisture content of each lift must be verified r by test, prior to placement of subsequent lifts. Backfill behind retaining walls should be compacted as described above to only 90 percent ! of the maximum dry density as determined by ASTM D1557. Bergquist Engineering Services Page 10 of 12 Proposed Taylor place Single-F ' y Residence B ojed Number. 200717, Report i Renton, Washington May 31, 2007 All structural fill/backfill must be placed under the full-time observation of a representative of the geotechnical engineer, and the specified compacted density and moisture content of each lift must be verified by test, prior to placement of subsequent lifts. Placement on frozen ground must not be attempted. 6.6 Drainage s Good drainage is critical to the performance of earth -supported structures such as foundations and retaining walls. Therefore, construction grades and final site grades must be designed to prevent water from ponding in areas on or adjacent to foundations, slabs -on - grade, and pavements. Infiltration of water into foundation and utility excavations shall be prevented during construction and throughout the life of the project. A perimeter footing drain -system consisting of rigid, perforated pipe surrounded by at least six inches of s/e- to s/,-Inch, washed gravel shall be installed. The washed gravel must be separated from the surrounding soil by a filter fabric such as Mirafi' 140N. The collected water shall be tight -lined away from the building to a suitable discharge point. Roof and surface drains must be provided but they not must be connected to the footing -drain system. l Roof drains must also be discharged into suitable discharge point. At no time, either during i or after construction, should water be discharged onto the slopes at this site. A schematic of 1 a perimeter footing drain is presented in Appendix A of this report. Where pavement does not immediately abut structures, slopes, with an outfall of at least three (3) percent for a minimum distance of five (5) feet from exterior footings, must be provided. 6.7 Groundwater Groundwater was not encountered in the boring at the site. Therefore, no difficulties during or after construction due to groundwater are anticipated. 6.8 Erosion The upper -most soils at this site classify as Sandy SILT according to the Unified Soil Classification System. These soils are moderately erodable, therefore, water shall not be permitted to run unimpeded off the surface of the site. Properly placed silt fences and straw bales shall be used temporarily to prevent surface water runoff and erosion during construction. Bergquist Engineering Services Page 11 of 12 Proposed Taylor Place Singfe-F " y Residence B oject Number. 2DO717, Report 1 Renton, Washington May 31, 2Q07 6.9 Construction Observation and Testing The recommendations presented in this report rely on adequate observation and testing of construction materials and procedures by the geotechnical engineer or his qualified representative. At a minimum, the testing program must include: • Observation and review of site clearing and review of all foundation excavations to evaluate whether actual conditions are consistent with those encountered during exploration. • Observation and testing of placement and compaction of oll' fill and backfill materials to evaluate compliance with specifications. f Field inspection and laboratory testing of materials and field inspection of methods as required by the appropriate Building Code. Typically, this includes inspection of placement of reinforcing steel; inspection and testing of portland cement concrete to evaluate compliance with specifications regarding slump, temperature, air content, and strength. 7.0 REPORT LIMITATIONS The recommendations presented in this report are for the exclusive use of James Hanson for the proposed single-family residence to be constructed on King County tax parcel number 9564800136 in Renton, Washington. The recommendations are based on subsurface information obtained by Bergquist Engineering Services (BES), design details and a topographic map provided by James Hanson. If there are any revisions to the plans or if deviations from the subsurface conditions noted in this report are encountered during construction, BES must be notified immediately to determine whether changes to the foundation recommendations are required. After the plans and specifications are more complete, the geotechnical engineer must be provided the opportunity to review them to check that these engineering recommendations have been interpreted properly. re• Sergquist Engineering Services Page 12 of 12 T �- 0 cn Z crs a� W w 0 U Z > L LJ 0 W m Z Z LU �— Q 0 0 °— Z � N � 0 t C W V) E a O 0 0 Z T aD C ckf + O O O `O • r 7 TAILOR AVE ALW. �� I 1.__ I �� •r �`S 00-3444E� r I E VW 5�� 1 'T/ 11 l l I J \ I l l l�� 71 1 1 1 ..�/l/l� qp s CP ` l r , � � '�" � / � / tie_ �• , . . • / if r J -� � �/ � � :. . -.. ', . •• ' ••�N,.:.'.•. ••.' . • ,�. low 0 C 0 Q7 E O E D Z U O V) W m 0 CD Cll� m Q X Z W d Q $, id'4� � �"' !� j4 �1f1U77 'i5 •, - r -' - �ek� �fpek .: SEATTLE ., �... p V W � i ok�e Washi ngtb' , PI TON r r4 c i ' a5i� 1 TT 1 s' P r.- 1,V .bra � 't � 1 �, �..-•=�--i da Lwrer' l a If ti� ■� , �LI-405 1 N, } k PROJECT SITE] o-Ili`" �., 'S•'" I I �7 �" _fir _.. - M �` C� 4 <� r -i• i_-� r i * Ir `,' -- I F,�.TI= u •• lGr Ij•! �c`ti '-�.YHck /f •i + ! i �.t JIM )11 �' PY_mpin *;� P lipj kT a 7 �— 2Me� . �.-n'i' y.d `1. :+1' 11✓4 i I. L'•'1 .r111, T. U'A IN ilr ate'_ - Ii1 Is VICINITY MAP Project Name: Ta for Place NW Property Bergquist Engineering For: dames Hanson Location: Kenton, Washington Services BES Project Number: 20071 7-1 Date: Mav 31. 2007 Al Bergquist Engineering Services Log of Boring 1 Project: Taylor Ploce NW Property Drilling Rig: Track -mounted Mitsubishi M45 Location: Renton, Washington Boring Site: $"/HSA BES Project No.. 200717, Report 1 Drilled By: Boretec, Inc. Date Drilled: April 24, 2007 Logged By: R. A. Bergquist, PE Approximate Ground Surface Elevation: 104' Depth (feet) Sarnpfe Number and Type N-Value Blows per six inches (Blows/Foot) Water Content N Description and USCS Classification —5 -- 10 _ 15 20 — — 25 1 AU 6,14,11 (25) 14,26,22 (48) 11,14,16 (30) 26,35,50/5 (85/11') 38,50/6,-(50/6") 17,21,32 (53) 27,50/6 50/6" NR - - - - - -Dah bcawri, lose Sandy 51LL(MIJ (Topsaill ------------- Brown, medium dense SAND (SP) with gravel - ------------------------------------------------ _ Brown, dense GRAVEL -SAND (GP) ------------------------------------------------ _10 _ Brown, medium dense to very dense SAND -SILT fSM) occasional gravel _15 ------------------------------------------------ _20_ Brown, very dense, fine- to medium -grained SAND (SP) Difficult Drilling, Probable Gravel Layer 25 25S 35S 45S 555 6SS 755 BSS 30 35 END OF BORING _ _30 35 A3 BORING LOG NOTES These notes and boring log are intended for use with this geotechnical report for the purposes and project described herein. The boring log depicts BES's interpretation of subsurface conditions at the location of the boring on the date noted. Subsurface conditions may vary, and groundwater levels may change because of seasonal or numerous other factors. Accordingly, the boring log should not be made a part of construction plans or be used to define construction conditions. The approximate location of the boring is shown on the Site Plan. The boring was located in the field by Mr. Bergquist and Mr. James Hanson by estimating distances from site features. Elevations on the boring logs were interpolated from a Topographic Survey provided by James Hanson. "Boring Size/Type" refers the diameter and type of auger used. "HSA" denotes hollow -stem auger. "SSA" denotes solid -stem auger. "BA" denotes bucket auger. "Sample Type" refers to the sampling method and equipment used during exploration where: • "AU" indicates a bulk sample taken from the ground surface or from the auger flights. • "SS" indicates split -spoon sampler with 1-3/8" inside diameter and 2" outside diameter. "N-Value (Blows/Foot)" refers to the number of blows from a 140-pound hammer falling 30 inches required to advance a standard sampler one -foot or a specified distance. Refusal is 50 blows for less than six inches or 25 blows without advancing the sampler. "Moisture Content" refers to the moisture content of the soil expressed in percent by weight as determined in the laboratory. "Description and Classification" refer to the materials encountered in the boring. The descriptions and classifications are generally based on visual examination in the field and laboratory. Where noted, laboratory tests were performed to determine the soil classification. The terms and symbols used in the boring logs are in general accordance with the Unified Soil Classification System. Laboratory tests are performed in general accordance with applicable procedures described by the American Society for Testing and Materials. "Qp" An estimate of the unconfined compressive strength of the soils sample in tons per square -foot using a factory calibrated, spring -loaded, pocket penetrometer. "V" Indicates location of groundwater at the elapsed time after drilling. A4 BORING LOG NOTES continued TERMS for RELATIVE DENSITY of NON -COHESIVE SOIL Term Standard Penetration Resistance "N" Very Loose 4 or less Loose 5 to 10 Medium Dense 1 1 to 30 Dense 31 to 50 Very Dense Over 50 blows/foot TERMS for RELATIVE CONSISTENCY of COHESIVE SOIL Term Unconfined Corn ressive Strength Q Very Soft 0 to 0.25 tons/square-foot (tsf) Soft 0.25 to 0.50 tsf Medium Stiff 0.50 to 1.00 tsf Stiff 1.00 to 2,00 tsf Very Stiff 2.00 to 4.00 tsf Hard Over 4.00 tsf DEFINITION of MATERIAL by DIAMETER of PARTICLE Boulder 8-inches+ Cobble 3 to 8 inches Gravel 3 inches to 5mm Coarse Sand 5mm to 0.6mm Medium Sand 0.6mm to 0.2mm Fine Sand 0.2mm to 0.074mm Silt 0.074mm to 0.005mm Clay less than 0.005mm A5 UNIFIED SOIL CLASSIFICATION SYSTEM (USCS) COARSE GRAINED SOILS (Less than 50% fines. Fines are soils passing the # 200 sieve.) GROUP SYMBOL DESCRIPTION MAJOR DIVISIONS GW------------------ Well -graded GRAVELS or GRAVEL -SAND mixtures, less than 5%fines. ----- ---- GPPoorly --- graded GRAVELS or GRAVEL -SAND' mixtures, less than 5%fines. GRAVELS --— More than half of coarse fraction is larger Silty GRAVELS, GRAVEL- SAND -SILT mixtures, more' GM than No. 4 sieve. than 12%fines. GC I Clayey GRAVELS, GRAVEL- SAND -CLAY mixtures, more than 12% fines. SW Well -graded SANDS or Gravelly SANDS mixtures, less than 5%fines. SP Poorly graded SANDS or Gravelly SANDS mixtures, less than 5%fines. SANDS Silty SANDS, SAND -SILT mixtures, more than 12% More than half of coarse fraction is smaller SM fines than No. 4 sieve. SC Cioyey SANDS, SAND -CLAY mixtures, more than 12% fines Note: Coarse -grained soils receive dual symbols if they contain between 5 and 12 percent fines. FINE-GRAINED SOILS _ (More than 50% fines. Fines are materials passing the # 200 sieve) GROUP SYMBOL DESCRIPTION j MAJOR DIVISIONS MIL Inorganic SILTS, very fine SANDS, ROCK FLOUR, j Silty or Clayey SANDS Inorganic CLAYS of low to medium plus#city, SILTS and CLAYS CL Gravelly CLAYS, Sandy CLAYS, Silty CLAYS, Lean Liquid limit less than 50 CLAYS GL Organic SILTS, or organic Silty CLAYS of low plasticity MH Inorganic SILTS, Micaceous or Diatomaceous fine j SANDS or SILTS, Elastic SILTS SILTS and CLAYS CH Inorganic CLAYS of high plasticity, fat CLAYS Liquid limit greater than 50 OH Organic CLAYS of medium to high plasticity PT PEAT, MUCK, and other highly organic soils Highly organic soils Note: Fine-grained soils receive dual symbols if their limits plot left of the "A" Line and have a plasticity index (PI) of 4 to 7 percent. UNIFIED SOIL CLASSIFICATION SYSTEM j Bergquist Engineering Services A6 A7 9 TAYLOR8N 5-30-07 15:39 140 120 v 100 M x a 80 R 40 Taylor Place NW Property 10 most critical surfaces, MINIMUM BISHOP FOS = 1.938 0 20 40 60 80 100 X-AXIS (feet) 120 140 -1 160 XSTABL File: TAYLOR8 5-30-07 15:39 * X S T A B L * Slope Stability Analysis * using the * Method of Slices * * * Copyright (C) 1992 - 99 * Interactive Software Designs, Inc. * Moscow, ID 83843, U.S.A. * * * All Rights Reserved * * * Ver. 5.204 96 - 1760 ****************************************** Problem Description : Taylor Place NW Property ----------------------------- SEGMENT BOUNDARY COORDINATES ----------------------------- 21 SURFACE boundary segments Segment x-left y-left x-right y-right Soil Unit No. (ft) (ft) (ft) (ft) Below Segment 1 .0 80.0 25.0 80.0 4 2 25.0 80.0 32.8 84.0 4 3 32.8 84.0 35.4 86.0 4 4 35.4 86.0 40.0 88.0 4 5 40.0 88.0 40.3 88.0 3 6 40.3 88.0 45.0 90.0 3 7 45.0 90.0 49.3 92.0 3 8 49.3 92.0 51.4, 94.0 3 9 51.4 94.0 59.8 96.0 3 10 59.8 96.0 62.5 97.0 3 11 62.5 97.0 65.0 98.0 2 12 65.0 98.0 70.2 100.0 2 13 70.2 100.0 72.0 100.5 2 14 72.0 100.5 75.4 102.0 1 15 75.4 102.0 80.3 104.0 1 16 80.3 104.0 85.0 104.0 1 17 85.0 104.0 85.1 101.0 1 18 85.1 101.0 87.0 101.0 1 19 87.0 101.0 87.1 104.0 1 20 87.1 104.0 115.3 104.0 1 21 115.3 104.0 140.0 104.0 1 3 SUBSURFACE boundary segments Segment x-left y-left x-right y-right R� Soil Unit` No. (ft) (ft) (ft) :) Below Segment 1 72.0 100.5 140.0 100.5 2 2 52.5 97.0 140.0 97.0 3 3 40.0 88.0 140.0 88.0 4 -------------------------- ISOTROPIC Soil Parameters -------------------------- 4 Soil unit(s) specified Soil Unit Weight Cohesion Friction Pore Pressure Water Unit Moist Sat. Intercept Angle Parameter Constant Surface No. (pcf) (pcf) (psf) (deg) Ru (psf) No. I 125.0 134.0 .0 35.00 .000 .0 0 2 135.0 140.0 .0 41.00 .000 .0 0 3 133.0 139.0 .0 39.00 .000 .0 0 4 135.0 140.0 .0 41.00 .000 .0 1 1 Water surface(s) have been specified Unit weight of water = 62.40 (pcf) Water Surface No. 1 specified by 2 coordinate points PHREATIC SURFACE, Point x-water y-water No. (ft) (ft) 1 .00 79.00 2 140.00 79.00 ------------------------------------------------------------- BOUNDARIES THAT LIMIT ------------------------------------------------------------- SURFACE GENERATION HAVE BEEN SPECIFIED UPPER limiting boundary of 2 segments: Segment x-left y-left x-right y-right No. (ft) (ft) (ft) (ft) 1 72.0 100.5 75.4 102.0 2 75.4 102.0 80.3 104.0 A critical failure surface searching method, using a random technique for generating CIRCULAR surfaces has been specified. B3 1600 trial sur"- es will be generated and alyzed. 40 Surfaces initiate from each of 40 points equally spaced along the ground surface between x = 2.0 ft and x = 60.0 ft Each surface terminates between x = 60.0 ft and x = 100.0 ft Unless further limitations were imposed, the minimum elevation at which a surface extends is y = .0 ft * * * * * DEFAULT SEGMENT LENGTH SELECTED BY XSTABL * * * * * 3.0 ft line segments define each trial failure surface. --------------------- ANGULAR RESTRICTIONS --------------------- The first segment of each failure surface will be inclined within the angular range defined by : Lower angular limit -45.0 degrees Upper angular limit (slope angle - 5.0) degrees ************************************************************************ ERROR # 29 ************************************************************************ ************************************************** *** The above error occurred in attempting *** *** to generate surface # 1 from the *** *** initiation point located at x = 72.00 *** ************************************************** Factors of safety have been calculated by the * * * * * SIMPLIFIED BISHOP METHOD The most critical circular failure surface is specified by 18 coordinate points Point c-surf y-surf No. (ft) (ft) 1 26.00 80.51 2 28.87 81.37 3 31.73 82.28 4 34.58 83.23 5 37.41 84.23 6 40.22 85.28 7 43.01 86.37 8 45.79 87.50 9 48.55 88.68 10 51.29 89.90 11 54.01 91.17 12 56.71 92.48 13 59.39 93.83 14 62.04 95.23 15 64.67 96.67 16 67.28 98.15 17 69.87 99.67 18 70.56 100.10 **** Simplified BISHOP FOS = 1.938 **** The following is a summary of the TEN most critical surfaces Problem Description : Taylor Place NW Property FOS Circle Center Radius Initial Terminal Resisting (BISHOP) x-coord y-coord x-coord x-coord Moment (ft) (ft) (ft) (ft) (ft) (ft-lb) 1. 1.938 -25.98 259.31 186.20 26.00 70.56 1.781E+06 2. 1.954 24.55 158.58 72.01 42.00 60.75 1.330E+05 3. 1.963 5.59 189.56 109.21 32.00 65.28 7.012E+05 4. 1.973 11.59 191.91 107.58 42.00 61.58 1.766E+05 5. 1.975 -110.66 477.70 419.73 28.00 80.44 3.549E+06 6. 1.979 24.25 129.49 49.01 26.00 60.12 6.345E+05 7. 2.005 -161.25 616.19 567.15 28.00 82.32 5.580E+06 8. 2.009 1.00 219.09 137.05 38.00 65.66 3.524E+05 9. 2.011 8.23 185.90 106.22 28.00 70.99 1.340E+06 10. 2.015 10.93 180.92 100.18 30.00 69.73 1.055E+06 * * * END OF FILE * * * TAYLOR8E 5-30--07 15:40 140 120 100 0 X Q 80 40 Taylor Place NW Property 10 most critical surfaces, MINIMUM BISHOP FOS = 1.215 0 20 40 60 80 100 120 140 X—AXIS (feet) 1 160 XSTASL File: TAYLOR[ 5-30-07 15:40 * X S T A B L * * * Slope Stability Analysis * using the * Method of Slices i * * * Copyright (C) 1992 - 99 * Interactive Software Designs, Inc. * Moscow, ID 83843, U.S.A. * * * All Rights Reserved i * * * Ver. 5.204 96 - 1760 Problem Description : Taylor Place NW Property ----------------------------- SEGMENT BOUNDARY COORDINATES ----------------------------- ! 21 SURFACE boundary segments Segment x-left y-left x-right y-right Soil Unit No. (ft) (ft) (ft) (ft) Below Segment i ' 1 .0 80.0 25.0 80.0 4 2 25.0 80.0 32.8 84.0 4 ' 3 32.8 64.0 35.4 86.0 4 4 35.4 86.0 40.0 88.0 4 5 40.0 88.0 40.3 88.0 3 6 40.3 88.0 45.0 90.0 3 7 45.0 90.0 49.3 92.0 3 8 49.3 92.0 51.4 94.0 3 9 51.4 94.0 59.8 96.0 3 10 59.8 96.0 62.5 97.0 3 11 62.5 97.0 65.0 98.0 2 12 65.0 98.0 70.2 100.0 2 13 70.2 100.0 72.0 100.5 2 14 72.0 100.5 75.4 102.0 1 15 75.4 102.0 80.3 104.0 1 16 80.3 104.0 85.0 104.0 1 17 85.0 104.0 85.1 101.0 1 18 85.1 101.0 87.0 101.0 1 19 87.0 101.0 87.1 104.0 1 20 87.1 104.0 115.3 104.0 1 21 115.3 104.0 140.0 104.0 1 3 SUBSURFACE boundary segments Segment x-left y-left x-right y-right Soil Uni%7 No. (ft) (ft) (ft) ' `t) Below Segment 1 72.0 100.5 140.0 100.5 2 2 62.5 97.0 140.0 97.0 3 3 40.0 88.0 140.0 88.0 4 -------------------------- ISOTROPIC Soil Parameters -------------------------- 4 Soil unit(s) specified Soil Unit Weight Cohesion Friction Pore Pressure Water Unit Moist Sat. Intercept Angle Parameter Constant Surface No. (pcf) (pcf) (psf) (deg) Ru (psf) No. 1 125.0 134.0 .0 35.00 .000 .0 0 2 135.0 140.0 .0 41.00 .000 .0 0 71 3 133.0 139.0 .0 39.00 .000 .0 0 4 135.0 140.0 .0 41.00 .000 .0 1 1 Water surface(s) have been specified Unit weight of water = 62.40 (pcf) Water Surface No. 1 specified by 2 coordinate points PHREATIC SURFACE, j Point x-water y-water No. (ft) (ft) 1 .00 79.00 2 140.00 79.00 A horizontal earthquake loading coefficient of .200 has been assigned A vertical earthquake loading coefficient of .000 has been assigned ------------------------------------------------------------- BOUNDARIES THAT LIMIT SURFACE GENERATION HAVE BEEN SPECIFIED ------------------------------------------------------------- I UPPER limiting boundary of 2 segments: Segment x-left y-left x-right y-right No. (ft) (ft) (ft) (ft) 1 72.0 100.5 75.4 102.0 B8 2 7-' 4 102.0 80.3 104.0 A critical failure surface searching method, using a random technique for generating CIRCULAR surfaces has been specified. 1600 trial surfaces will be generated and analyzed. 40 Surfaces initiate from each of 40 points equally spaced along the ground surface between x = 2.0 ft and x = 80.0 ft Each surface terminates between x = 60.0 ft and x = 100.0 ft Unless further limitations were imposed, the minimum elevation at which a surface extends is y = .0 ft * * * * * DEFAULT SEGMENT LENGTH SELECTED BY XSTAEL * * * * * 3.0 ft line segments define each trial failure surface. --------------------- ANGULAR RESTRICTIONS --------------------- The first segment of each failure surface will be inclined within the angular range defined by : Lower angular limit -45.0 degrees Upper angular limit (slope angle - 5.0) degrees ************************************************************************ ERROR # 29 ************************************************************************ *** The above error occurred in attempting *** *** to generate surface ## 1 from the *** *** initiation point located at x = 72.00 *** ************************************************** Factors of safety have been calculated by the : B9 * * * * * SIM FIED BISHOP METHOD The most critical circular failure surface is specified by 8 coordinate points Point x-surf y-surf No. (ft) (ft) 1 42.00 88.72 j 2 44.89 89.51 3 47.75 90.42 4 50.57 91.44 5 53.35 92.59 6 56.07 93.84 7 58.74 95.21 8 60.75 96.35 **** Simplified BISHOP FOS = 1.215 **** The following is a summary of the TEN most critical surfaces Problem Description : Taylor Place NW Property 3 I FOS Circle Center Radius Initial Terminal Resisting (BISHOP) x-coord y-coord x-coord x-coord Moment (ft) (ft) (ft) (ft) (ft) (ft-lb) 1. 1.215 24.55 158.58 72.01 42.00 60.75 1.227.E+05 2. 1.217 -25.98 259.31 186.20 26.00 70.56 1.629E+06 3. 1.222 11.59 191.91 107.58 42.00 61.58 1.622E+05 4. 1.228 -110.66 477.70 419.73 28.00 80.44 3.252E+06 5. 1.231 5.59 189.56 109.21 32.00 65.28 6.430E+05 6. 1.239 1.00 219.09 137.05 38.00 65.66 3.243.E+05 7. 1.239 -161.25 616.19 567.1.5 28.00 82.32 5.122E+06 8. 1.251 -63.98 383.27 315.05 30.00 81.84 3.044E+06 9. 1.256 24.67 159.45 73.54 38.00 65.12 2.593E+05 10. 1.257 -43.79 334.54 262.56 30.00 61.85 2.781E+06 * * * END OF FILE * * * 4. TAYLOR9N 5-30-07 15:35 I'e. 120 a) 100 a) 0 x a so i 40 Taylor Place NW Property 10 most critical surfaces, MINIMUM BISHOP FOS = 1.938 0 20 40 60 so 100 120 140 X-AXES (feet) 160 w XSTABL File: TAYLOR9 5-30-07 15.35 * X S T A B L * Slope Stability Analysis * using the * Method of Slices * * * Copyright (C) 1992 - 99 * Interactive Software Designs, Inc. * Moscow, ID 83843, U.S.A. * * * All Rights Reserved * * * Ver. 5.204 96 - 1760 ****************************************** Problem Description : Taylor Place NW Property ----------------------------- SEGMENT BOUNDARY COORDINATES ----------------------------- 21 SURFACE boundary segments Segment x-left y-left No. (ft) (ft) 1 .0 80.0 2 25.0 80.0 3 32.8 84.0 4 35.4 86.0 5 40.0 88.0 6 40.3 88.0 7 45.0 90.0 8 49.3 92.0 9 51.4 94.0 10 59.8 96.0 11 62.5 97.0 12 65.0 98.0 13 70.2 100.0 14 72.0 100.5 15 75.4 102.0 16 80.3 104.0 17 85.0 104.0 18 85.1 101.0 19 87.0 101.0 20 87.1 104.0 21 115.3 104.0 x-right y-right Soil Unit (ft) (ft) Below Segment 25.0 80.0 4 32.8 84.0 4 35.4 86.0 4 40.0 88.0 4 40.3 88.0 3 45.0 90.0 3 49.3 92.0 3 51.4 94.0 3 59.8 96.0 3 62.5 97.0 3 65.0 98.0 2 70.2 100.0 2 72.0 100.5 2 75.4 102.0 1 80.3 104.0 1 85.0 104.0 1 85.1 101.0 1 87.0 101.0 1 87.1 104.0 1 115.3 104.0 1 140.0 104.0 1 3 SUBSURFACE boundary segments Segment x-left y-left x-right y-right Soil Uz$i)t2 No. (ft) (ft) (ft) ' -t) Below Segment 1 72.0 100.5 140.0 100.5 2 2 62.5 97.0 140.0 97.0 3 3 40.0 88.0 140.0 B8.0 4 -------------------------- ISOTROPIC Soil Parameters -------------------------- 4 Soil unit(s) specified Soil Unit Weight Cohesion Friction Pore Pressure Water Unit Moist Sat. Intercept Angle Parameter Constant Surface No. (pcf) (pcf) (psf) (deg) Ru (psf) No. 1 125.0 134.0 .0 35.00 .000 .0 0 2 135.0 140.0 .0 41.00 .000 .0 0 3 133.0 139.0 .0 39.00 .000 .0 0 4 135.0 140.0 .0 41.00 .000 .0 1 1 Water surface(s) have been specified Unit weight of water = 62.40 (pcf) Water Surface No. 1 specified by 2 coordinate points PHREATIC SURFACE, ********************************** Point x-water Y-water No. (ft) (ft) 1 .00 79.00 2 140.00 79.00 --------------- BOUNDARY LOADS --------------- 2 load(s) specified Load x-left x-right Intensity Direction No. (ft) (ft) (psf) (deg) 1 85.1 87.0 2000.0 .0 2 87.0 135.0 500.0 .0 NOTE - Intensity is specified as a uniformly distributed force acting on a HORIZONTALLY projected surface. B13 BOUNDARIES THAT 1IT SURFACE GENERATION HA BEEN SPECIFIED ------------------------------------------------------------- UPPER limiting boundary of 2 segments: Segment x-left y-left x-right y-right No. (ft) (ft) (ft) (ft) 1 72.0 100.5 75.4 102.0 2 75.4 102.0 80.3 104.0 A critical failure surface searching method, using a random technique for generating CIRCULAR surfaces has been specified. 1600 trial surfaces will be generated and analyzed. 40 Surfaces initiate from each of 40 points equally spaced along the ground surface between x = 2.0 ft and x = 80.0 ft Each surface terminates between x = 60.0 ft and x = 100.0 ft Unless further limitations were imposed, the minimum elevation at which a surface extends is y = .0 ft * * * * * DEFAULT SEGMENT LENGTH SELECTED BY XSTABL * * * * * 3.0 ft line segments define each trial failure surface. --------------------- ANGULAR RESTRICTIONS --------------------- The first segment of each failure surface will be inclined within the angular range defined by : Lower angular limit -45.0 degrees Upper angular limit (slope angle - 5.0) degrees ERROR # 29 ****************************** *********** ******* B14 *** The a' ve error occurred in atte ting *** * * * to aerate surface # 1 fro ;he *** initiation point located at x = 72.00 *** Factors of safety have been calculated by the * * * * * SIMPLIFIED BISHOP METHOD The most critical circular failure surface is specified by 18 coordinate points Point x-surf y-surf No. (ft) (ft) 1 26.00 80.51 .m 2 28.87 81.37 3 31.73 82.28 4 34.58 83.23 5 37.41 84.23 6 40.22 85.28 7 43.01 86.37 8 45.79 87.50 9 48.55 88.68 10 51.29 89.90 11 54.01 91.17 12 56.71 92.48 13 59.39 93.83 14 62.04 95.23 15 64.67 96.67 16 67.28 98.15 17 69.87 99.67 18 70.56 100.10 **** Simplified BISHOP FOS = 1.938 **** f The following is a summary of the TEN most critical surfaces 1 Problem Description : Taylor Place NW Property FOS Circle Center Radius Initial Terminal Resisting (BISHOP) x-coord y-coord x-coord x-coord Moment (ft) (ft) (ft) (ft) (ft) (ft-lb) 1. 1.938 -25.98 259.31 186.20 26.00 70.56 1.781E+06 2. 1.954 24.55 158.58 72.01 42.00 60.75 1.330E+05 3. 1.963 5.59 189.56 109.21 32.00 65.28 7.012E+05 4. 1.973 11.59 191.91 107.58 42.00 61.58 .766E+05 5. 1.975 _110.66 477.70 419.73 28.00 80.44 .1549E+06 6. 1.979 `' .25 129.49 49.01 -.00 60.12 6.345E+05 7. 2.005 -1 .25 616.19 567.15 .00 82.32 5.580E+06 8. 2.009 1.00 219.09 137.05 38.00 65.66 3.524E+05 9. 2.011 8.23 185.90 106.22 28.00 70.99 1.340E+06 10. 2.015 10.93 180.92 100.18 30.00 69.73 1..055E+06 * * * END OF FILE * * * TAYLOR9E 5-30-07 15:33 140 120 �u 100 U) x Q 80 We 40 Taylor Place NW Property 10 most critical surfaces, MINIMUM BISHOP FOS = 1.215 0 20 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 X—AXIS (feet) a XSTABL File: TAYLOR 5-30-07 15:33 * X S T A B L * * * Slope Stability Analysis * using the * Method of Slices * * * Copyright (C) 1992 - 99 * Interactive Software Designs, Inc. * Moscow, ID 83843, U.S.A. I * * * All Rights Reserved } * * * Ver. 5.204 96 - 1760 ****************************************** Problem Description : Taylor Place NW Property SEGMENT -BOUNDARY -COORDINATES - 21 SURFACE boundary segments Segment x-left y-left x-right y-right Soil Unit No. (ft) (ft) (ft) (ft) Below Segment 1 .0 80.0 25.0 80.0 4 2 25.0 80.0 32.8 84.0 4 3 32.8 84.0 35.4 86.0 4 4 35.4 86.0 40.0 88.0 4 5 40.0 88.0 40.3 88.0 3 6 40.3 88.0 45.0 90.0 3 7 45.0 90.0 49.3 92.0 3 8 49.3 92.0 51.4 94.0 3 9 51.4 94.0 59.8 96.0 3 10 59.8 96.0 62.5 97.0 3 11 62.5 97.0 65.0 98.0 2 12 65.0 98.0 70.2 100.0 2 13 70.2 100.0 72.0 100.5 2 14 72.0 100.5 75.4 102.0 1 15 75.4 102.0 80.3 104.0 1 16 80.3 104.0 85.0 104.0 1 17 85.0 104.0 85.1 101.0 1 18 85.1 101.0 87.0 101.0 1 19 87.0 101.0 87.1 104.0 1 20 87.1 104.0 115.3 104.0 1 21 115.3 104.0 140.0 104.0 1 3 SUBSURFACE boundary segments j Segment x-left y-left x-right y-right Soil. UA1tB No. (ft) (ft) (ft) ) Below Segment 1 72.0 100.5 140.0 100.5 2 2 62.5 97.0 140.0 97.0 3 3 40.0 88.0 140.0 88.0 4 -------------------------- ISOTROPIC Soil Parameters -------------------------- i 4 Soil unit(s) specified Soil. Unit Weight Cohesion Friction Pore Pressure Water Unit Moist Sat. Intercept Angle Parameter Constant Surface No. (pcf) (pcf) (psf) (deg) Ru (psf) No. 1 125.0 134.0 .0 35.00 .000 .0 0 2 135.0 140.0 .0 41.00 .000 .0 0 3 133.0 139.0 .0 39.00 .000 .0 0 4 135.0 140.0 .0 41.00 .000 .0 1 1 Water surface(s) have been specified Unit weight of water = 62.40 (pcf) Water Surface No. 1 specified by 2 coordinate points PHREATIC SURFACE, Point x-water y-water No. (ft) (ft) 1 .00 79.00 2 140.00 79.00 A horizontal earthquake loading coefficient of .200 has been assigned A vertical earthquake loading coefficient of .000 has been assigned - BOUNDARYLOADS 1 ----2 load(s) sP ecified Load x-left x-right Intensity Direction No. (ft) (ft) (psf) (deg) B19 1 85 87.0 2 8' 135 . 0 2000. .0 500. .0 NOTE - Intensity is specified as a uniformly distributed force acting on a HORIZONTALLY projected surface. ------------------------------------------------------------- BOUNDARIES THAT LIMIT SURFACE GENERATION HAVE BEEN SPECIFIED ------------------------------------------------------------- UPPER limiting boundary of 2 segments: Segment x-left y-left x--right No. (ft) (ft) (ft) 1 72.0 100.5 75.4 2 75.4 102.0 80.3 y-right (ft) 102.0 104.0 A critical failure surface searching method, using a random technique for generating CIRCULAR surfaces has been specified. 1600 trial surfaces will be generated and analyzed. 40 Surfaces initiate from each of 40 points equally spaced along the ground surface between x = 2.0 ft and x = 80.0 ft Each surface terminates between X = 60.0 ft and x = 100.0 ft Unless further limitations were unposed, the minimum elevation at which a surface extends is y = .0 ft * * * * * .DEFAULT SEGMENT LENGTH SELECTED BY XSTABL * * * * * 3.0 ft line segments define each trial failure surface. ---------------------- ANGULAR RESTRICTIONS --------------------- The first segment of each failure surface will be inclined within the angular range defined by : Lower angular limit -45.0 degrees Upper angular limit (slope angle - 5.0) degrees B20 ERROR # 29 ************************************************** *** The above error occurred in attempting *** *** to generate surface # 1 from the *** *** initiation point located at x = 72.00 *** ************************************************** Factors of safety have been calculated by the * * * * * SIMPLIFIED BISHOP METHOD The most critical circular failure surface is specified by 8 coordinate points Point x-surf y-surf No. (ft) (ft) 1 42.00 88.72 2 44.89 89.51 3 47.75 90.42 4 50.57 91.44 5 53.35 92.59 6 56.07 93.84 7 58.74 95.21 8 60.75 96.35 **** Simplified BISHOP FOS = 1.215 **** The following is a summary of the TEN most critical surfaces Problem Description : Taylor Place NW Property FOS Circle Center Radius Initial Terminal Resisting (BISHOP) x-coord y-coord x-coord x--coord Moment (ft) (ft) (ft) (ft) (ft) (ft-lb) 1. 1.215 24.55 158.58 72.01 42.00 60.75 1.221E+05 2. 1.217 -25.98 259.31 186.20 26.00 70.56 1.629E+06 3. 1.222 11.59 191.91 107.58 42.00 61.58 1.622E+05 4. 1.228 -110.66 477.70 419.73 28.00 80.44 3.252E+06 5. 1.231 5.59 189.56 109.21 32.00 65.28 6.430E+05 6. 1.239 1.00 219.09 137.05 38.00 65.66 3 )41E+05 7. 1.239 -161.25 61.6.19 567.15 28.00 82.32 �U122E+06 1.251 - .98 383.27 315.05 .00 1.256 .67 159.45 73.54 .00 1.257 -43.79 334.54 262.56 30.00 * * * END OF FILE * 81.84 3.044E+06 65.12 2.593E+05 81.85 2.781E+06 B22 NOTES B23 Printed: 02-22-2008 Payment Made CITY OF RENTON 1055 S. Grady Way Renton, WA 98055 KANNING G" OF KN ON Land Use Actions RECEIPT Permit#: LUA08-016 02/22/2008 10:10 AM Total Payment: 1,225.00 Current Payment Made to the Fallowing Items: FEB 2 2 2008 V EMINIED Receipt Number Payee: Hanson Consulting Trans Account Code Description Amount ---------------- ------ 5010 ------------------ 000.345.81.00.0007 ------------------------------- Environmental Review 1,000.00 5015 000.345.81.00.0012 Lot Line Adjustment 225.00 Payments made for this receipt Trans Method Description Amount Payment Check 2266 1,225.00 Account Balances Trans Account Code Description 3021 303.000.00.345.85 Park Mitigation Fee 5006 000.345.81.00.0002 Annexation Fees 5007 000.345.81.00.0003 Appeals/Waivers 5008 000.345.81.00.0004 Binding Site/Short Plat 5009 000.345.81.00.0006 Conditional Use Fees 5010 000.345.81.00.0007 Environmental Review 5011 000.345.81.00.0008 Prelim/Tentative Plat 5012 000.345.81.00.0009 Final Plat 5013 000.245.81.00.0010 Pun 5014 000.345.81.00,0011 Grading & Filling Fees 5015 000.345.81.00.0012 Lot Line Adjustment 5016 000.345,81.00,0013 Mobile Home Parks 5017 000.345.81.00,0014 Rezone 5018 000.345.81.00.0015 Routine Vegetation Mgmt 5019 000.345.81.00.0016 Shoreline Subst Dev 5020 000.345.81.00.001'7 Site Plan Approval 5021 000.345.81.00.0018 Temp Use, Hobbyk, Fence 5022 000.345.81.00.0019 Variance Fees 5024 000.345.81.00.0024 Conditional Approval Fee 5036 000,345,81.00.0005 Comprehensive Plan Amend 5309 000.341.60.00.0024 Booklets/EiS/Copies 5941 000.341.50.00.0000 Maps (Taxable) 5954 650.237.00.00.0000 Special Deposits 5955 000.0.519.90.42.1 Postage 5998 000.231.70.00.0000 Tax Balance Due .ao .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 .00 .00 .00 00 00 CO 00 00 .ao R0800838 Remaining Balance Due: $0.00 A `y II 05 11 — �78 p2)O FOUND 10�( i� �� 2� — GONGRET w�� MONUMENT / I � � 5) �•a� �� 22 to NISITED C /OI) PLAN Lr=61= D"NP 0010kn 22 ,E» PROPERTY L I NE m GENTERL I NE OF EX I ST I NC STREAM .►r — — — — ._.. — — — _ OHWM OF STREAM .\ WOW 35 STREAM BUFFER �0 Imemo AVERA65ED BUFFER M —-- -♦ � --- S 1 LT FENCE t SPLIT -RAIL FENCE AND NC PA ' U M , \ I kn 51CN5 AL.ONO AVERAC►ED WETLAND BOUNDARY Q �, o ♦ I � 30 I MPACT LESENC) _ :.,BUFFER REDUCTION bob SE Q t U T..z -- -.. - r 1 k a.F q\. by Y, Yi 'S ens •.e . C. 000��E�� IONITI- T D ♦ a \ .. + + + + + BUFFER REPLACEMENT 608 SF BUFFER ENHANCEMENT qa8 Slr a AREA OF CLEMATIS REMOVAL. 21186 5F d t \r 1 SITE PLAN MITIGATION N OR,4PH I G SCALE (IN PST) 0 10 20 30 40 5GALE:1: 20 XISTINrw I S" MAPLE IA S" MAPLE 15 W MAPLE 2 6" MAPLE 3 8" MAPLE 4 15" MAPLE 5 W MAPLE 6 W' MAPLE 7 12" MAPLE 8 18" MAPLE &A IS" MAPLE 8B 10" MAPLE g 6" MAPLE 10 12" MAPLE 11 24" MAPLE 12. 10" MAPLE 13 12" MAPLE 14 6" MAPLE 15 &" MAPLE (2) - 16 36" MAPLE 17 12" MAPLE I & W MAPLE Ig 12" MAPLE 20 W MAPLE 21 12 MAPLE 22 10" MAPLE 23 6" MAPLE 24 10" MAPLE 25 12" MAPLE 26 W' MAPLE 27 12" MAPLE 28 15" MAPLE (2) 2g W' MAPLE SHEI SHEET H1.1 w2.i w2.2 ES NUMBER SHEET TITLE 51TE PLAN IMPACTS 4 MITIGATION PLANT I NC PLAN, PLANT SCHEDULE, DETAIL. 4 NOTES CONSTRUCTION SPEC I E I CAT I ON5 Cd 2 Working Days Before You Dip 1-800-424-5555, UWH@m Underground Loca*m Center NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION THESE PLANS HAVE BEEN SUBMITTED TO THE APPROPRIATE ACENCI E5 FOR REVIEW AND APPROVAL. UNTIL APPROVED, THESE PLANS ARE: SUBJECT TO REVISION 2. OTES SURVEY PROVIDED BY GRONE5 $ A55OGIATE5, 23806 (BOTH AVE., 5E, KENT, WA, g80421(425) 432-5g30. SOURCE DRAIN I NC WAS MOD I P I ED BY AOA FOR V15UAL ENHANCEMENT. APPROVED FOR CONSTRUCTION BY: CITY OF RENTON DEPARTMENT OF PLANN I NC DATE: 4:1 4J A T O Date •r�•�ra•1:. Scale 6s ►• i I Sheet # ALI M., o� 400 5TJEAM 21 O I PLANT SCHEDULE TREES SYMBOL r HOUSE EI - I 24 � U 5 BOL T olror 261 C�4RAOE Idle 1-00 PLANT I NS PLAN GRAPHIG SGALE (ix Fee-r) 0 10 20 30 40 50ALE:1: 20 SET TREE 5TRA16HT , ROOTBALL ON SOLID OR ON COMPACTED I BAGKFILL PLANTING FULL WITH NATIVE 5G SOIL TO STABILIZE ROOTBALL. GUT AK 5TRIi9, AND BURLAF BAGKFILL REMAINIM PLANTING HOLE PER SPEGIFIGATION5. Ah BAGKFILL AS NOTED INSTALLATION NOTES 1 545 TREE P SGALE: MS N ROOT BALL DIAMETER ANTINr= (T) 2"x2' HEMLOGK/FIR STAKES, LOCATED OUT5IDE OF ROOTBALL. FASTEN WCHAINLOCK TIES. STAKE WITH NO EXPOSED WIRE ENDS. NEITHER 5TAKE OR WIRE MAY TOUCH TREE TRUNK. STAKE HEIGHT MUST BE AT LEAST 5' FROM FINISHED GRADE. PLACE 5" OF BARK MULGH IN 5AUGER TO WITHIN 3" OF THE TRUNK. REMOVE CONTAINER OR COMPLETELY REMOVE BURLAP AND ALL TWINE FROM ROOTBALL PRIOR TO PLACEMENT IN PLANTING PIT. FORM TEMPORARY 5" HT. WATER DAM AROUND TREE WITH SOIL TO HOLD WATER. REMOVE WITH FINE GRADE (TYP) SCARIFY 51DE5 OF PLANTIN6 HOLE. MAKE SURE HOLE HAS 600D DRAINA6E. EXI5TIN6 NATIVE SOIL OR — NEWLY PLACED TOPSOIL. LJ 4H 12 SCIENTIFIC NAME COMMON NAME SPAG I NG QTY. SIZE (MIN) NOTES �- ACER MAGROPHYLLUM B16 LEAF MAPLE AS SHOWN 1 2 CAL. SINGLE TRUNK, WELL BRANGHED -CORYLUS GORNUTA WESTERN HAZELNUT A5 SHOWN 2 2 CAL. MULTI ---STEM (3 MIN.) P5EUDOT5U6 A MENZ I E511 DOU6 LA5 FIR. A5 SHOWN 2 2 CAL. 545, FULL 4 BUSHY SG I ENT I F I C NAME Hof -no I SGUS o I SGOLOfiZ POLYSTIGHUM MUNITUM G .. G11 C-MI 1-r -=MAD a�-r COMMON NAME OGEAN SPRAY ORE OON GRAPE RED CURRANT NOOTKA R05E COMMON NAME SWORD FERN P05T CONNECTION SPLIT-RAIL PENCE SGALE: N.T.S. 3 TIMES ROOT BALL DIAMETER 5PAGIN6 QTY. SIZE (MIN) NOTES 5' O.G. 3 1 GAL. MULTI -CANE (3 MIN) 3' O.G. 22 1 GAL. FULL 4 BUSHY 5' O.G. 4 l GAL. MULTI -CANE (3 MIN.) 510.0. .22 I GAL. MULTI -GANE (3 MIN) 5PAG I N6 QTY. 51 ZE (MIN) NOTES 26 1 GAL. FULL 4 BUSHY INFORMATIVE 516N DETAIL �k GHAMFER TOP OF P05T 45 DECREES TO A DEPTH OF 1" ON ALL.. FOUR SIDES. �i- I ATTACH PREPRINTED METAL 516N TO POST WITH, TWO 5/6" DIA. 6ALV. 1 u� 6ALV. CARRIAGE BOLTS. k 516N DETAIL +000 DISTANCE �-- o 0 O O O . w.,. ._... --- .._ -. _' ..+its" .. E.. .. _ ..• rn. ... � ti SET SHRUB STRAIGHT AND PLACE ROOTBALL ON 50LID 6ROUND OR ON COMPACTED BAGKFILL. BAGKFILL PLANTING HOLE 1/2 FULL WITH NATIVE SOIL, TAMP 501L TO STABILIZE ROOTBALL. DO NOT DISTURB ROOTBALL. BAGKFILL REMAINING PLANTING HOLE PER SPECIFICATIONS. AMEND BAGKFILL AS NOTED IN THE INSTALLATION NOTES. MULCH 24' DID FINAL 6RADE. 5GARIFY 51DE5 OF PLANTING HOLE. MAKE SURE HOLE HAS GOOD DRAINAGE. EXI5TIN6 NATIVE SOIL. ROOT BALL DIAF£l[R CONTAINER SHRUB PLANTIN6 SCALE: NTS MULC+ 24" D I it1 BARE -ROOT � SLALE: NTS GROUNDCOVER PLANT. SEE PLANT L15T 2' DEPTH BARK MULGH TOPSOIL DEPTH AND TYPE A5 5PEGIFIED EXI5TIN6 E CROUNDCOVER PLANT 5PAGIN6 A5 INDICATED ON PLANT LIST (TYPIGAL.) EDGE OF PLANTER ;16ROUNDGOVER PLANTINC7-- (TYP 1 � SCALE, NTS TlyoP BAGKFILL PLANTING HOLE 1/2 FULL WITH NATIVE SOIL, LIGHTLY COMPACT SOIL AROUND ROOTS AND ALLOW WATER TO SETTLE. DO NOT LEAVE AIR POCKETS. BAGKFILL REMAINING PLANTING HOLE PER SPECIFICATIONS. AMEND BAGKFILL AS NOTED IN THE INSTALLATION NOTES. SCARIFY 51DE5 OF PLANTING HOLE. MAKE SURD HOLE Hf15 GOOD DRAINAGE. FOR BARE ROOT PLANTING ON SLOPES, INSTALL PLANT UPRI61iT ON LEVEL 501E TO A55URE COVER OF i200T5 ON DOWNHILL SIDE OF PLANT. COMPACT 50(L UNDER ROOT MPt55 EXI5TIN6 NATIVE SOIL. �HRUB PLANTINS T**eP.2 rvENERAL PLANTIN6 INSTALLATION NOTES I. PLANT TREE $ /OR SHRUB 1/2 " HI GHER THAN DEPTH 6 ROWN AT NURSERY. 2. FOR CONTAINER TREES $/OR -SHRUBS, SCORE FOUR 51DE5 OF ROOTBALL PRIOR TO PLANT I N6 . BUTTERFLY ROOTBALL IF ROOT G I RGL I NC 15 EVIDENT. 3. AFTER PLANTING, STAKE TREES ONLY IF NECESSARY (LEANING OR DROOPING) OR IN EXPOSED AREAS. 4. TREE STAKES TO BE VERTICAL, PARALLEL, EVEN -TOPPED, UN5GARRED AM:? DRIVEN INTO UNDISTURBED 506RADE. REMOVE AFTER ONE YEAR. 5. WATER IMMEDIATELY AND THOROUGHLY, HEAVIER AT F I R5T, 2 OR 3 TIMES PER WEEK THROUGH THE DRY SEASON, THEN LE55 UNTIL ESTABL 1 SHED. b. FERTILIZE ALL TREES AND SHRUBS KITH AN APPROVED SLOW RELEASE FERTILIZER APPLIED AT MANUFAGTURER'5 5U6GE5TED RATES. I. ALL PLANTI N6 P I T5 SHALL BE AMENDED WITH A SO 1 L MO 15TURE RETENTION A6 ENT TO A551 ST IN KEEPI NC THE 501 L MOIST DURING THE DRY SEASON. Ca12 WorkiV Days Before You Did 1-800-424-5555 oD,WrrD,aP,w,v NOT FOR 0ON5TRUGT I ON THESE PLANS HAVE BEEN SUBMITTED TO THE APPROPRIATE AGENG I E5 FOR REVIEW AND APPROVAL. UNTIL APPROVED, THESE PLANS ARE: 5UBJEGT TO REV 15 i ON 1. SURVEY PROVIDED BY CRONES 4 A55OG I ATE5, 23806 MOTH AVE., SE, KENT, WA, a8042, (425) 432-5a30. 2. SOURCE DRAHI NC WAS MODIFIED BY AOA FOR VISUAL ENHANCEMENT. APPROVED FOR CONSTRUCTION BY: G I TY OF RENTON DEPARTMENT OF PLANKING DATE: cr3 b waa M d' n � w M • r"'I M cn U ^ 4 � o 4� CD CD Q � U o0 a 0 Lltc'Ej • F4 o c Date 02-07-08 Scale AS NOTED Project# 3251 co rQ .� CQ I H Sheet # o 04 OIn ON PECIFICATIONS AR - GENE I , GONE? I TI D GENERAL SITE CON21IION5 Contractor shall give AOA a minimum of ten (10) days notice prior to entention to proceed with construction. No construction work shall commence until there is a meeting between the client, AOA, General, Clearing, and/or Earthwork Contractors, and participating Contractor. The approved plans and specifications shall be reviewed to allow partle5 Involved to understand the intent and the speclfic details related to the construction documents, specifications, and site constraints. Locations of existing utilities have been established by field survey or obtained from available records and should be considered approximate only and not necessarily complete. It is the sole responsibility of the Gontractor to: (1) independently verify the accuracy of utility locations and (2) discover and avoid any utilities within the mitigation area(s) not shown, which may be affected by Implementation of this plan. Such orea(s) are to be clearly marked In the field. AOA shall resolve any conflicts with the approved plan prior to start of construction. A copy of the approved plans must be on site whenever construction Is In progress and shall remain on site until project completion. -� Go structlon _must be performed in accordance with Agency standards, codes, permit conditions, and other applicablordinances and policies. Th applicant Is responsible for obtaining any other related or required p mi sp prior to the start of construction. A �Luolifled wetland consultant shall be on site, as necessary, to monitor construction and approve minor revisions to the plan. At minimum, the following inspections and oversight by AOA or another qualified wetland professional Is needed: a. An initial pre -construction meeting with the contractor and sub -contractors, b. Immediately following survey stake placement, c. Twice during clearing operations, d. Inspect woody debris selection, stockpiling and placement, e. Inspect and approve or reject delivered plant material, f . Inspect planting layout, . Final as -built ins ection and punch -list walkthrou h with the contractor. p p g SURVEY/STAKEE&LAQ LIMITS OF G EAR I NC Prior to any construction, a licensed surveyor shall survey, stake, and flog the silt fence and buffer boundaries. Clearing limits are depicted on Drawing Wl.l as the averaged buffer. AOA shall review and approve flagging prior to any vegetation removal. Gontractor shall be res onslble for avoiding disturbance to all significant trees and nave shrubs located within the mitt ation/cIcarin area. No removal of an native vegetation shall occur without prior g approval I AOA. Gontractor shall exercise care to protect from injury pp � p J y to trunk, roots, or branches, of any trees or shrubs that are to remain. Any living woody plant that 15 damaged during construction !shall be treated within 24-hours of occurrence. AOA shall be notified immediately of Incident. Wound shaping treatment shall be done. Wound shaping Includes, but is not limited to: evenly cutting broken branches, exposed roots and damaged tree bark Immediately aof ter damage e occurs. Injured plants shall be thoroughly watered and additional measures shall e taken, as appropriate, to old in plant survival. EROSION CONTROL MEA5URE5 Gontractor shall install 511t-fencing per local completion a ency standards as depicted on DrawingWl.l,prior to any constructlon activity. Contrac tor shall maintain erosion control facilities until com letion of construction. AOA to verifylocations of erosion control measures rior to site u p clearing. Site areas exposed during clearing and construction must be covered with wood chip mulch (maximum depth of straw to be 39, erosion control netting, plast[c sheeting, or permanent erosion control within 4& hours of disturbance on s lopes steeper than 33 percent (3:1). Gontractor shall maintain erosion control measures during implementation of the mitigation plan. These measures sha l I remain in place until authorization Is given by AOA for removal .or location adjustment. It is the responsibility of the Gontractor to remove a I I erosion control measures adjacent to sensitive areas when authorized by AOA. As construction ro resses and seasonal conditions dictate, erosion control facilities shall be maintained and/or" altered as � required req, AOA to ensure continued erosion/sedimentation control. where possible, natural ground cover vegetation shall be maintained for silt control. 51 TE LO6C1 NO During site logging, any non -marketable debris (small trees, branches, etc) not being exported for sale shall be ground up into course wood chips for later use as mulch around planted trees and shrubs. Gontractor shall determine stockpile location for ground up wood chips. Excess slash can also be placed as brush piles, If available. AOA shall designate brush pile locations. CLEAR AND GRUB Gontractor shall clear and grub areas within the clearing limits of the mitigation area with the exception of flagged existing vegetation to remain. In areas of existing vegetation, Gontractor shall remove blackberry and other invasive species by hand, with minimal disturbance to the existing vegetation. Cleared and grubbed vegetation shall be exported from the site. Particular care must be given to ensure complete removal of tops and roots of reed canarygrass plants and any other Invasive/exotic plant species. AOA to designate any additional plant species to be removed/treated prior to construction. SOIL 5TABILIZATION If there is a delay in construction for any reason, Gontractor, unless otherwise stated in writing, shall be responsible for maintenance of erosion control measures, drainage and tem orar drip Irrigation during g p y p g g construction delay period. Disturbed land areas in which construction activities would be suspended for 50 days or more shall be immediately hydroseeded with the mixes specified in the Plant Schedule (see Drawing W2.0. Seeded areas shall be Irrigated and maintained until acceptable seed germination has been determined by AOA. Upon construction completion, Gontractor shall re -seed by hand, all exposed ground with the seed mixes specified in the Plant Schedule. WARRANTY Gontractor shall ensure that construction related activities do not damage off -site features or adjacent vegetation. AOA shall be notified immediately if accidental damage occurs. Contractor shall ensure that adjacent roads are maintained and clear of soil and/or other debris at all times during construction. Contractor shall comply with the City Of Renton codes regarding street maintenance/cleaning during construction. Any changes or modifications to this plan must receive prior approval from AOA. PART 2 - PLANTIN& GENERAL CONDITIONS In the mitigation area, the Contractor shall remove weedy or exotic Invasive species (e.g., 5cot's broom, English ivy, Himalayan and evergreen blackberry, reed canarygrass, purple loosestrlfe, hedge bindweed (morning glory), Japanese knotweed, Ganado thistle, and creeping nightshade) prior to plant installation. Gontractor shall verify that plant installation conditions are suitable within the mitigation area. Any unsatlsfactory conditions shall be corrected prior to start of work. When conditions detrimental to plant growth are encountered, such as rubble fill, adverse drainage conditions, significant vegetation, or obstructions, Gontractor shall notify AOA prior to planting. Beginning of work constitutes acceptance of conditions as satisfactory. Plants Installed in undisturbed areas shall be lntegr°ated with existing native vegetation, and planted In a random, naturalistic pattern. CONTRACTOR TD YERI FY_PLANT SCHEDULE WITH PLAN_ Gontractor is responsible to verify plant locations and quantities of plants on the Plant Schedule with those represented on the plan. Actual plant quantities shown on plans are to prevail over quantities shown on the Plant Schedule In the event of a discrepancy. L.OGATE/5TAKE/VERI EY PLANTI NC AREAS Gontractor shall field locate, stake, and verify planting areas and configurations prior to planting. AOA shall review and approve locations prior to planting. Proposed locations of trees and shrubs shall be staked and Identified with an approved coding system or by placement of the actual plant material. For large groupings. of a single species of shrub, Gontractor may stake the planting boundaries. AOA shall review and approve locations of all plants and plant groupings prior to planting. APPROVE P ANT I NC LOGATION5 AND SPAG I N6 Planting locations shown on planting plans are approximate, based on anticipated site conditions. Actual planting locations may vary from those shown due to final site conditions and locations of existing vegetation. Nevertheless, any variations from the planting plan will require prior approval by AOA. Plant spacing for species listed Is to be random (naturalistic), and not In a regular grid pattern. On -center spacing called out on plant list indicates an average spacing dimension. For example, when the plan calls for 36" O.G., spacing shall vary from 30"-42" O.G., with an average spacing of 36 inches. AOA shall review planting locations and spacing prior to plant installation. PART 3 -- PLANT MATERIAL 5TANDARD5 PLANT MATERIALS AOA shall examine plant material prior to planting. Any material not meeting the required specifications shall be immediately removed from the site and replaced with like material that meets the required standards. Plant material shall meet the requirements of State and Federal laws with respect to plant disease and infestations. Inspection certificates, required by law, shall accompany each and every shipment and shall be submitted to AOA upon Contractor's receipt of plant material. Plant materials shall be locally grown (western WA, .western OR, or western BG), healthy, bushy, in vigorous growing condition, and be guaranteed true to size, name, and variety. If replacement of plant material is necessary due to construction damage or plant failure within one year of installation, the sizes, speoles, and quor�ltles shall be equal to specified plants, as indicated on the plans. Plants shall be nursery grown, well -rooted, of normal growth and habit, and free from disease or infestation. AOA reserves the right to require replacement or substitution of any plants deemed unsuitable. Trees shall have uniform branching, single straight trunks, (unless specified as multi -stemmed), and the central leader intact and undamaged. Balled and burlapped stock shall have been root -pruned at least once within the previous two years, and the plant stock shall have been grown in a container for at least one full growing season. Container stock shall be fully rooted but not root -bound. Plant material with damaged root zones or broken root balls will not be accepted. Coniferous trees shall be nursery grown, full and bushy, and with uniform branchin and a natural non -sheared form. Original central leader must be healthy and undamaged. Maximum a between branchin shall not exceed cl" and length of to leader gap not exceed Q ". g j 9 p Shrubs shall have a minimum of three stems and shall be a minimum height of IS inches. Gontractor shall submit documentation that specified plant materials have been ordered and secured. A list of supp I ier names, addresses, phone numbers and the storage/growing location of 'tithe materials shall be submitted to AOA within 30 days of contract award. SUB5TI TUTI ON5 Substitutions of specified plant species, size, or condition will be allowed only if prior written approval Is obtained by AOA and regulatory agencies prior to ordering material. Bareroot stock of equal size to specified container or 646 plantings may be substituted for deciduous container or 54B plantings when available, with the exception of Acer, Rubus, Ribes 4 5ambucus species. Evergreen plant material shall be container or B45 VERIFY NURSERY STOCK CONDITION AOA shall Inspect plant material at the job site, including previously tagged trees, for compliance with required standards for plant size and qualityprior to planting. This includes, but is not limited to, size and condiion of rootballs and roots stems presence of insects latent y ,p , injuries and defects. Trees must be untied and separated for inspections. AOA reserves the right to refuse an /all plant material any time prior to final acce tance If it 15 determined that such material does not eet the specifications ons as described herein. Rejected material p � shall be Immediately removed from project site. VERIFY 5TORA6E 51 TE AND METHOD Plants shall be stored in a manner necessary to support their horticultural requirements. Plant material stored on -site shall be protected from weather damage, construction activity and the public. Balled and burlapped material which cannot be installed Immediately shall be "heeled -in" to prevent desiccation prior to planting. Rootballs shall be protected by covering with moist soli, wood chip mulch and watered as necessary. Plant specimens shall be kept moist and shaded until the actual time of plant installation. Immediately after planting, soils in the planting area shall be saturated to prevent capillary stress. AGA shall approve planting locations. If Items are to be corrected, a punch list shall be prepared by AOA and submitted to the Contractor for completion. After punch list items have been completed, AOA shall review the project for final acceptance of plan implementation. The date of final acceptance shall constitute the beginning of the one-year plant guarantee period. MAINTENANCE Contractor shall review landscape maintenance recommendations with a qualified wetland biologist from AOA who is familiar with the stated goals and objectives of the mitigation plan. PART 4 - PLANT INSTALLATION Contractor shall be responsible for watering plants Immediately upon installation, and again over the entire planting area upon completion of SOIL PREPARATION/AMENDMENTS landscape Installation. Irrigation is required within the mitigation areas) Prior to installation of plantings, all construction debris and any other for at least three growing seasons following planting to ensure non-native material shall be removed from the mitigation area. Trees adequate plant establishment. and shrubs shall be pit planted as shown in details on Drowings' w2.1. A soil moisture retention agent (polymer) shall be Included In planting Gontractor shall remove tree stakes and guy wires two years after backfill per manufacturer's specification (see General Planting installation unless receiving written permission from AOA to remove Installation Notes on Drawing W2.1). •.. stakes and guy wires one year after installation. jA Plantingits shall be backfllled with a 30/`70 mixture of lm ort d,� - p p Gontractor shall correct erosion and drainage problems as required. g q weed -free topsoil and the native soil from the planting pit.a Gontractor shall remove irrigation system 3-years after In all planting areas, Gontractor shall loosely tie a 2' piece of pink v flogging to the to portion of all planted vegetation to facilitate `3.0 on completion of the one year maintenance, an inspection by AOA shall gg g p p p g p, ,: post -construction performance and maintenance review by AOA and be conducted to confirm that the mitigation area was properly regulatory agencies. maintained. if items are to be corrected, a punch list shall be prepared by and submitted to the Gontractor for correction. Upon correction of SOIL MOISTURE RETENTION AGENT :. the punch I ist items, the pro ect sha i I be reviewed AOA for f Ina I p p j � So1lMolst or equivalent shall be added to the topsoil backfill of all closeout of plan implementation. planting pits. The 5oilMoi5t shall be hydrated before being added to topsoil backf i l l . Manufacturers recommended application rates and usage shall be followed. MULCH A 3" layer of wood chip mulch from ground on -site slash shall be placed around the base of each new tree (36" dia. ring) and shrub planting (24" dia. ring) for erosion, weed control, and moisture retention. STAK I NC Trees shall be staked with at least one stake and attached at a height of a proximately 3/4 the height of the tree (see tree detail on Drawing W2.1 If deemed necessary by the Gontractor and AOA. Contractor shall remove stakes at the end of the one-year guarantee period, unless otherwise directed by AOA. PART 5 - IRRIGATION. 51CN5, AND GLEAN UP TEMPORARY DRIP I RR I CATION SYSTEM Gontractor shall design build an above ground temporary drip irrigation system capable of providing 1/2" of flow to each newly installed plant. Client shall provide water and electricity for the system. Irrigation is required within the mitigation area for at least three growing seasons following planting to ensure adequate establishment of plant material. The Maintenance Gontractor Shall be responsible to activate, winterize, maintain, and to continually verify adequate operation of the temporary drip irrigation system. System function (including electronic valve and controller function) shall be Inspected for operation and full coverage of all planted areas during each maintenance visit. The system shall be repaired immediately if found to be damaged or malfunctioning. The system shall be activated by June 15 and winterized by October 15. If hot dry weather occurs either before or after these dates, the irrigation system shall be activated earlier In the season or remain active later into the fall. During the first year after installation, the Irrigation system shall be programmed to provide ,�" of water every three days. Irrigation rates may be increased as necessary during prolonged periods of hot, dry weather to prevent plant mortality. During the second year after installation, irrigation shall be programmed to provide)" of water once a week. However, if more than 10% of lant replacement occurs, watering rates will be maintained at a rate of 2 of, water every three days for the duration of the monitoring perlod, The irrigation bid shall include a one-year warranty against defects in materials and workmanship from the date of final project acceptance. The warranty shall include system activation and winterization for the first year and immediate repair of the system If It Is observed to be malfunctioning. INSTALL SPLIT -RAIL -FENCE AND S 16 N5 Gontractor shall construct split --rail fence per Detail I on Drawing W2.1 along the buffer boundary. AOA shall approve fence location prior to construction. Gontractor shall Install Gity of Renton Native Growth Protection Area (NCPA) signs at -15' spacing along the fence. RESEED D 15TURBED AREAS Gontractor shall re -Seed (and thoroughly water) exposed soll5 with the seed mixes specified In the Plant 5chedule following planting installation. RESTORE EXISTING NATURAL OR LANDSCAPED AREAS Existing natural or landscaped areas that are damaged during construction shall be restored to their original condition, unless improvements or modifications are specified for those areas. GLEAN -UP Gontractor shall be responsible for the removal of construction materials and debris on the site following installation of plant materials. PART 6 - FINAL ACCEPTANCE PLANT WARRANTY Contractor's warranty shall include replacement of plants (same size and species shown on the drawings) that prove either to be mislocated or unsuitable as to plant material standards. Except for loss due to excessively severe climatological conditions (substantiated by 10-year recorded weather charts), installed plant materials are required to be guaranteed for one year against defects and un5atlsfactory growth, except for cases of neglect by Owner or abuse/damage by others. Plants replaced shall be reinitiated under plant guarantee conditions. Any changes or modifications to this plan must. receive prior approval from AOA. FINAL ACCEPTANCE Upon completion of planting, the Gontractor shall provide AOA with a set of clearly marked prints designating the actual locations of plantings within the mitigation area. Gontractor shall keep a complete set of prints at the job site during construction for the purpose of "red -lining" changes or modifications to the approved plans and shall update said Information on a daily basis. t Ca12 Warkirp Days Before You DID 1-800-424-5555 UMes Undarpromd Locailon Center 0D,MTJ'D.0KWN NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION THESE PLANS HAVE BEEN SUBMITTED TO THE APPROPR I ATE A6 ENG I E5 FOR REV I EN AND APPROVAL. UNTIL APPROVED, THESE PLANS ARE: SUBJECT TO RE\1151ON NOTES 1. SURVEY PROVIDED BY GRONE5 4 ASSOCIATES, 23806 MOTH AVE., 5E, KENT, WA, Q80421(425) 432-56130. 2. SOURCE DRAHI NG WAS MODIFIED BY AOA FOR V15JAL ENHANCEMENT. APPROVED FOR CONSTRUCTION BY: G I TY OF RENTON DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING DATE: a� A 0 W Sheet # m OL ► • a CQ Q 101 UN ��'594 o� U � C o0 CITY. OF RENTON, WASHINGTO LOT LINE ADJUSTMENT NO. LUA-08-016-LLA. LND-30-0339 OWNER'S DECLARATION KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENT THAT WE THE UNDERSIGNED OWNER(S) OF THE LAND HEREIN DESCRIBED 00 HEREBY MAKE A BOUNDARY LINE ADJUSTMENT THEREOF PURSUANT TO RCW 58. 17 6 AND DECLARE THIS ADJUSTMENT TO BE THE GRAPHIC .REPRESENTATION OF THE SAME, AND THAT SAID ADJUSTMENT /5 MADE WITH THE FREE CONSENT- AND IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE DESIRES OF THE OWNER(S) IN WITNESS WHEREOF WE HAVE SET HANDS AND SEALS. A oe JAM C. HANSON, MANAGING MEMBER OF C. HANSON LLC STATE OF WASHINGTON) COUN TY OF ON THIS DAY PERSONALLY APPEARED BEFORE ME JAMES C. HANSON, TO ME KNOWN TO BE THE MANAGING MEMBER, OF THE CORPORA 770N DESCRIBED IN THE FOREGOING INSTRUMENT AND. ACKNOWLEDGED, .7�+� SAID INSTRUMENT TO BE THE FREE AND VOLUNTARY, ACT�,A V I DI E A�qy-12, k, AND ON OA TH S TA TED THA T HE WAS A U THORIZED TO EXECUTE 'THE SA IC INS TRUMEN T ON BEHALF OF THE CORPORA 770N. MY HAND AND SEAL THIS DAY OF JUid 2008. GIVEN HOER NOT #,��,7�wbCIN AND FtW TN STATE OF WASHINGTON EXPIRES EX MY COMMISSION RESIDING' A T, All 14 qs tj -�v 4f l(k c PRINTED NAME qw WAS RECORDING CERTIFICATE FILED. FOR RECORD THIS DAY OF -------- - - 200- AT IN BOOK ----- OF SURVEYS AT PAGE ___, AT THE REQUEST OF --------------- MANAGER ------------ - SUPT. OF RECORDS N APPROVAL CITY OF RENTON DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS. APPROVED THIS — — — — DAY OF — — — — — — - 20__- ----------------- ------------- — ADMINISTRATOR, PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT KING COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF ASSESSMENTS EXAMINED & APPROVED THIS DAY 0 F -------- 20-- ---------- ------- ------------------ KING COUNTY ASSESSOR DEPUTY KING COUNTY ASSESSOR 40 ORIGINAL LEGAL DESCRIPTION: (TAX LOT 9564800135) OUR PARCEL A: LOT 8, BLOCK 4, WOODY GLEN ADDITION, ACCORDING TO ThE PLAT THEREOF, RECORDED IN VOLUME 47 Or PLATS, PAGE 91, IN KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON, EXCEPT THAT PORTION THEREOF LYING SOUTH OF A LINE R,JNNING FROM THE MOST WES TERL Y CORNER OF SAID L 0 T TO A POINT 120 FEET DIS TA N T (MEASURED A L ONG THE SOUTHERLY BOUNDARY THEREOF) FROM THE MOST SOUTHERLY CORNER THEREOF PARCEL B: LOT 9, BLOCK 4, WOODY GLEN ADDITION, ACCORDING TO Tl--,.T PLAT THEREOF RECORDED IN VOLUME 47 OF PLATS, PAGE 91, IN KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON; EXCEPT THE WESTERLY 120 FEET THEREOF. PARCEL C. THA T POR TION OF L 0 T 5, BL OCK 4, WOODY GLEN ADDITION, ACCORDING TO THE PLAT THEREOF RECORDED IN VOL LIME 47 OF PLA TS, PAGE 91, IN G COUNTY, WASHING TON, L)lNG SOUTH OF A LINE RUNNING FROM THE MOST EASTERLCORNER OF SAID LOT TO A POINT ON THE WESTERLY MARGIN OF SAID LOT, 45 FEET NC-i"i'THERLY FROM THE MOST. SOUTHERLY CORNER OF SAID LOT BASIS OF BEARINGS: THE BASIS OF BEARINGS FOR THIS MAP IS BETWEEN THE TV'O FOUND MONUMENTS IN THE CENTERLINE OF NW 5TH STREET, 8E4Rh'IG N78"29'08"E PER PLAT OF WOODY GLEN ADDITION, 4 719 1 62, AS SHOWN. CROSS REFERENCE: REFERENCE 70 IS MADE TO THE FOLLOWING SURVEYS FOR SEC"' N SUBDIVISION AND TIE INFORMATION, PLAT OF WOODY GLEN ADDITION, VOLUME 47, PAGES 91-92 RECORD OF SURVEY, BOOK 188, PAGE 104 RECORDS..,OF KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON LOT ADDRESSES: LOT 1; 460 TAYLOR PLACE NW RENTON, WASHINGTON 98055 LOT 2. 453 TAYLOR AVENUE NW RENTON, WASHINGTON 98055 S UR VE YOR'S NOTES: FIELD MEASUREMENTS FOR THIS SURVEY PERFORMED WITH A 2" TOPCON TOTAL STATION USING TRAVERSE METHODS THAT MEET OR EXCEED ACCURACY REQUIREMENTS CONTAINED IN WAC 332. I JO. 090. THE TIES AS SHOWN TO THE CITY OF RENTON CONTROL MONUMENTS WERE NOT USED IN THE T DE ERMINATION OF THE BOUNOARY LINE LOCATIONS. THE LAiNGUAGE IN THE LEGAL DESCRIPTION TOGETHER WITH THE PLATS AND THEIR ASSOCIATED CONTROL MONUMENTS WERE USED EXCLUSIVELY FOR THE DETERMINATION OF T14E BOUNDI;RY LINES OF T141S LOT LINE ADJUSTMENT THIS SURVEY WAS PREPARED FOR THE PURPOSES OF A LOT LINE ADJUSTMENT BETWEEN LOT ONE AND LOT TWO AS SHOWN HEREON AND SHOULD ONLY BE USED FOR SAID PURPOSES. EXCEPTIONS FROM TITLE REPORT. 1. COVENANTS, CONDITIONS, RESTRICTIONS, EASEMENTS, NO�ES, DEDICATIONS AND SETRACKS, IF ANY, FROM PLAT 2. EASEMENT FOR WATER LINE AFFECTING NORTHERLY PORi'�Om OF LOT 8, RECORDED APRIL 5, 1955, AF 4542262 LAND SURVEYOR'S CERTIFICATE THIS BOUNDARY LINE ADJUSTMENT' CORRECTLY REPRESENTS A SURVEY MADE BY ME OR UNDR MY DIRECTION IN CONFORMANCE WITH STATE AND COUNTY STATUTES IN JANUARY, OF 2008. .............. .. CERTIFICATE NO. ..2..........9537 ....... RECORDING NO. PORTION OF _SE 1/4, 0K1/4, SEC. -.7- TWP. ZIN., R -5-E., W.M. PARCEL AREAS EXISTING REVISED PARCEL A: 14,8751- SF LOT 1LOT SF. 8JJ7- 2 17,292.± SF TOTAL STREAM BUFFER - 3505± SF 12,862-+ SF NET PARCEL B. .9066-+ SF NET AREA 4832.± SF PARCEL C: 1687-+ SF 1604± SF 75 7.± SF TOTAL=2361± SF NET STREAM BUFFER 2069± SF STREAM BUFFER 33551 SF, OF WHICH 2069--t IS OUTSIDE OF CRI77CAL SLOPE AREA CRONES & ASSOC. LAND SURVEYORS 23606 190TH AVE. S.E. KENT, WA 98042 (425) 432-5930 FAX 425-432-5933 COPYRIGHT BY CRONES & ASSOCIATES LAND SURVEYING. VICINITY MAP NTS ...... ... X ............... ........... . ........................ ........... ... ............. . . . . .. ........... .............. ............ ......... FY ...... . ........... ............. ........... W, W .............. .. .... ....... ........ ........... .......... . .......... ............ . ........... ............ ............ ........... .......... ...... ... ...... ....... .... . r. .............. ...... . .... . .... .. i is ........................ :::: ............... ..................... ...... .... .. ...... ..... ....... .......... .......... ............. . ...... ............ ................ A ............. . . ........ .............. ................ . . ............ ........... ........... ....... ............ .......... ...... ..... ...... ....... .......... ............... ....... .......... ............... ......... .......... ................. .......... .......... 5 ........... ....................... ..... ...... ...................... ............ ....... I ........ ...... ................... .. ..... ............. _ . .......... ............ .......... ................ .......... .............. ....... ..... % ............ ........... ........ ..... ......... . . . ...................... .. ....................... . ......... .......... ........... .............. ......... ......... ............... ...... ...................... ......... ............. ........ ....... .......... ........................ . ......... ........... ...... ............. ....... ....... ............................ % ..................... ......................... ......... . .. ...... . ....... ........... too ..................... ..................... .. ........... .......... .............. ............ TAYLOR PLACE LOT LINE ADJUSTMENT OWN. BY DATE JOB NO. ORO MAY, 2008 HANS0-03A-8LA.l.DWG CHkD. BY SHEET GRA 1 OF. 2 CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON � LOT LINE ADJUSTMENT NO. LUA-08-016-LLA. LNDoo-noon ,2 ,3Z'55"E(?) N78 ''�(P)(H) FOUND CONCRETE •o ; ��- N7829 08(R) MONUMENT �,4� • 04,(M) (VISITED 6101) , BA,515 OF E ZZ5 00,(p) ST 5TI4 P/w • O��.O �Zf A� „ LO CIS 4 ITION B ADD C, QDY �,Ggs 9;? riv pLpf 06 00 W � SLTREAM � N69'03'04 "W o _59 01- <4 o � b . r.rr r . �✓ p J `r ptiD 1-/9 - LOT 1 8337t SF X14 L O 1 144.22 17, 292t SF S86' 19'24 "E . r rr I' r r j oo FOUND CONCRETE MONUMENT, IN CASE WITH. TACK RENTON MONUMENT # 1899 N. 55495.849 E. 395359. 447 6 �PARK (VISITED 11/04) BLS AE L l f0 rwp%S � DIT. 63 1 p) Al �� 21.21 (P2) ea4' M)( `. � N69 25 16 E P 225.0 ( , VoLtJM i 1 t f; " (Ft) FOUND CONCRETE 78,29 08 r(P) I MONUMENT IN N 155 EO \ CASE WITH NAIL. -I- (VISITED N7�'32 11/04) �,� oc� , � \ 2p oo cp., C,r FOUND CONCRETE MONUMENT 5.9159 . NO SCALE IN CASE WITH REBAR DETAIL OF RENTON MONUMENT 11896 30 GRAPHIC SCALE - 0 15 30 60 ( IN FEET ) .. 1 inch = 30 Ift. LEGEND: -� FOUND MONUMENT, AS SHOWN • SET REBAR AND CAP LS 29527 O FOUND REBAR AND CAP LS 18898, ON PROPERLY CORNER R/W RIGHT OF WAY (H) INDICATES VALUE HELD FOR THIS SURVEY (M) INDICATES MEASURED VALUE (P) INDICATES RECORD PER PLAT OF WOODY GLEN ADDITION (47/91-92) (P2) INDICATES RECORD PER. PLAT OF LATIMER S LAKE PARK ADDITION (18/63) (R) INDICATES RECORD PER ROS 188/104 -46 N 55212.103 � CITY TIES �% E� 395512.663 (VISITED 11/04) D of Xe f CRONES & ASSOC@ b02 xx �o 0 LAND-S-URVEYORS 37�4 \ 23806 190TH AVE. S.E. KENT, WA 98042 (425) 432-5930 EXPIRES: �•-Z T - E SE SECTION 'T WNSHTP _.3.r NORTH RANGE �._� ._ EAST, W.M. FAX 425-432�5s33 ` THAT F�JRT�UN OF Tk�E _....�.��.� ��1 �..��..� /�r Q�. ,..:.., , z� d TAYLOR PLACE LOT LINE ADJUSTMENT OWN. BY: DATE: JOB NO.: GRO MAY, 2008 HANSO-03A-BLA2.DWG CHKD. BY: SCALE: SHEET: GRA 1" _' 30 2 O,F 2