Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
LUA-09-028 - NGY Short Plat Report 1
TY v v V` a LOG File Name:-61C LP File No: /-pM Activity (Note names, type of - resolution) Ovid mm 1 i � � I , I.—M. .'— W-0 �jAct i+yty. Log�July 9V/�+1 �r+-]:'.+4ian!c!7 r4,wd /} /j�� 1 5�0 (/i v V'a�.�''EJ,,.�j/ 1J L03SO031 Activity Log File Nmer^- NGY 3 LOT SP — Activity (Note names, type of contact, issue, resolution) iIMP ,,� 101 wwamm' I i tom': - �►� .rl.�.� �_ . - �, ' / / e m / -, a r I �.1 • .� i _ -%I �M M i , r FORMS/FORMS95/ERS/ACTLOG.SUB,DOC 12/30/98 C C �� r / 3 —/V '�XCA). (foil' "rat, King County Department of Development and Environmental Services 900 Oakesdale Avenue Southwest Renton, WA 98055-1219 June 18, 2004 Teng Ngy 5563 1561h Avenue SE Bellevue, WA 98006 RE: Preliminary Approval for Short Subdivision No.L03S0031_ Dear Mr. Ngy: The Land Use Services Division (LUSD) has completed review of the short subdivision application captioned above. The LUSD finds that the proposed short subdivision complies with the King County Land Segregation Code (Title 19A), Zoning Code (Title 21A), and other applicable codes as specified in King County Code (KCC) 19A.08.060. The short subdivision is granted preliminary approval subject to the Conditions of Preliminary Approval attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference. Any aggrieved party may appeal this decision by the appeal deadline, which is July 6, 2004. The appeal procedure is enclosed for your information. The preliminary approval is valid'for a period of 60 months from the date of this letter, unless an appeal is filed. In the event that an appeal is filed, the preliminary approval is valid for a period of 60 months from the date of the appeal decision. Enclosed are the following: G Notice of Decision o Conditions of Preliminary Approval o Appeal Procedure If you have any questions regarding this letter, please contact Fereshteh Dehkordi, Program Manager, at (206) 296-7173 and Curt Foster, Engineer, at (206) 296-7106. Sincerely, ,/' x 7D7 "-z'� Curt Foster, P.E., Senior Engineer Engineering Review Section, LUSD Enclosures cc: Applicant File Mark Olson, Consulting Engineer Tom Tuma, Consulting Surveyor c' Rich Hudson, Senior Planner Current Planning Section, LUSD Letter,Frm/Covert/ r2000.SP.doc 3/9/00 Department of Development and Environmental Services 900 Oakesdale Avenue SW Renton, WA 98055-1219 CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL File No. L03SO031 File Name: Ngy Short Plat Application Date: November 14, 2003 Revision Date: None This short subdivision received November 14, 2003 is granted preliminary approval subject to the following Conditions of Approval. These conditions are based on a field visit and current information the applicant has provided about the short subdivision property. Occasionally, in -satisfying the Conditions of Approval, a more definitive land use limitation of the property may be revealed. New information (such as final Health approval or sensitive areas review) may require additional conditions and may reduce the number of lots. Final approval will be granted after compliance with the Conditions of Approval. Key codes and guidelines have been noted to provide guidance in preparing the required plans and other documents. Compliance with some of the following conditions will require that engineering plans be prepared by a professional civil engineer licensed in the State of Washington. 1. Title 19A A. The short subdivision shall comply with all provisions of Title 19A. B. The final review process must be completed prior to recording of the short subdivision. The Department of Development and Environmental Services (DDES) strongly recommends the Final Short Plat be submitted at least one year prior to the expiration date of the project. The Final Short Plat submittal package includes: 1. A surveyed map page (four sets) including lot area closure calculations; 2. Final health approval from the King County Health Department (different from preliminary health approval); 3. A current short plat certificate and supporting documents (easements, etc.); 4. Payment of the Final Short Plat submittal fee; 5. A copy of this letter (preliminary approval letter). A licensed land surveyor shall be hired to prepare the final short subdivision documents. These documents shall comply with all of the following conditions for final approval: C. All persons having an ownership interest in the subject property are required to sign the final short subdivision. D. If modifications to the approved preliminary site plan (Attachment 1) are needed to accomplish engineering design or final short plat, then a revised preliminary site plan shall be submitted to DDES for review and approval. The revised site plans shall be submitted with the engineering plans or the final short plat submittal. 2. Surface Water Management (KCC 9) 1998 King County Surface Water Design Manual (SWDM) A. This short subdivision proposal is subject to Full Drainage Review (Section 1,1.2.3). Final short subdivision approval shall require full compliance with drainage provisions and storm drainage requirements of this section. Compliance may result in reducing the number and/or location of lots shown on the approved preliminary short subdivision. The conditions outlined below are site -specific drainage conditions: (1) Core Requirement #1 - Discharge at the Natural Location Note: A drainage adjustment is required to pump drainage from the southwest corned to the ditch along 105`h Avenue Southeast (SWDM Section 1.2.4.3). Approval is anticipated. (2) Core Requirement #2 - Off -Site Analysis (3) Core Requirement #3 - Flow Control (4) Core Requirement #4 - Conveyance System Notes: 1) Drainage easements are required across Lot 2 allowing a minimum undisturbed flow path of 25 feet for BMP's located on Lots 1 and 3. 2) Additionally, an easement is required across Lots 2 and 3 for the drainage pumped back to 105`1' Avenue SE (5) Core Requirement #S - Erosion & Sedimentation Control (6) Core Requirement #6 - Maintenance and Operation (7) Core Requirement #7 - Financial Guarantees & Liability (8) Core Requirement #8 - Water Quality (S 1) Special Requirement #1 - Other Adopted Requirements Notes: 1) KCC 16.82.150 D (Seasonal Clearing Restriction) 2) SC-P3 (Clearing and Grading) 3) SO-220 (Significant Trees) B. A professional civil engineer licensed in the State of Washington shall prepare a Technical Information Report and/or engineering plans per Chapter 2, of the 1998 King County Surface Water Design.Manual. 3. Health (KCC 13) This project is exempt from further King County Heath Department review. However, if improvements are required from the Sewer and/or the Water District, then verification shall be required from said District(s) that the improvements have been bonded and/or installed, prior to final recording of the short plat. 4. Road Standards (KCC 14) 1993 King County Road Standards, Ordinance 11187 Final short subdivision approval shall require full compliance with the provisions set forth in the King County Road Standards including engineering plans for all road improvements. The engineering plans shall be prepared by a professional civil engineer licensed in the State of Washington. DDES strongly recommends the engineering plans be submitted at least two years prior to the expiration date of the rp o c . The following conditions are road requirements for this short subdivision and shall be satisfied, unless a variance is obtained or unless otherwise approved by DDES (Section 1.03). A. That portion of the west half of 105`h Avenue SE adjoining the subject property shall be improved with curb gutter and sidewalk (urban subaccess standard, KCRS Section 2.03). B. The on -site road (serving more than 2 lots) shall be constructed to private minor access standards (KCRS Section 2.06). The tract shall be extended into the property to the point that adequately serves the front lots (20 foot minimum). The road shall be located in a private access tract (PAT) with undivided ownership to the lots it serves, and the lot owners shall be responsible for its maintenance. A panhandle may be extended from Lot 2 to the PAT. C. The following notes shall be shown on the final recorded short subdivision: (1) Warning: King County has no responsibility to build, improve, maintain or otherwise service the private roads contained within or providing service to the property described in this short subdivision. (2) All private easements and/or tracts to be maintained, repaired, and/or rebuilt by the owners of the parcels having legal access therefrom and their heirs, assigns or successors, unless and until such roads are improved to King County standards and are dedicated and accepted by King County for maintenance. D. All restrictions, easements, tracts, and their purpose shall be shown on the final recorded short subdivision. 5. Building and Construction Standards (Title 16) Grading. The applicant shall comply with all applicable provisions of KCC 16.82. 6. Fire Code (KCC 17) Section 902 of the 1997 Edition of Uniform Fire Code The Fire Engineering approval has been granted with no additional conditions 7. Zoning Code (KCC 21A) A. Density and Dimensions (KCC 21A.12) All lots shall meet the density and dimensions requirements of the R-8 zone classification or shall be as shown on the face of the approved preliminary short subdivision, whichever is larger. Minor revisions to the short subdivision, which do not result in substantial changes and/or do not create additional lots may be approved at the discretion of LUSD. The existing House must meet the setback requirements per KCC 2 IA. 12. 030. D. Street Trees (KCC 2IA. 16) Street trees shall be provided along that portion of the right-of-way for 1051h Avenue SE abutting the subject property, pursuant to the provisions of KCC 21 A. i 6.050(E) and KCC 21 A.16.190, unless existing trees are shown to be equivalent to the requirement of Code. See note below. The required street trees shall be designed as to location and spacing on the final plan submittal. The street trees must be installed and inspected, or a performance bond posted, prior to recording of the plat. If a performance bond is posted, the street trees must be installed and inspected within one year of recording of the plat. At the time of inspection, if the trees are found to be installed per the approved plan, a maintenance bond must be submitted, or the performance bond replaced with a maintenance bond, and held for one year. After one year, the maintenance bond may be released after DDES has completed a second inspection and determined that the trees have been kept healthy and thriving. NOTE: A. KCC 21A.16.050 Landscaping - street frontages, The average width of perimeter landscaping along street frontages shall be provided as follows: For single-family subdivisions: 1. Trees shall be planted at the rate of one tree for every 40 feet of frontage along a neighborhood collector street or arterial street. 2. The trees shall be: a: Located within the street right-of-way if permitted by the custodial state or local agency; b. No more than 20 feet from the street right-of-way line when located within a lot; c. Maintained by the adjacent landowner unless part of a County maintenance program; and d. A species approved by the County if located within the street right-of-way and compatible with overhead utility lines. 3. The trees may be spread at irregular intervals in order to accommodate sight distance requirements for driveways and intersections. B. KCC 21A.16.190 Financial guarantees. Financial guarantees shall be required consistent with the provisions of Title 27A. 9. Road Mitigation Payment System The applicant shall comply with Road Mitigation Payment System (MPS), by paying the required MPS fee as determined by King County Department of Transportation, plus an administrative fee. The applicant has an option to either: 1. Pay the MPS fee at final short subdivision recording and the MPS administrative fee at final short subdivision application, or 2. Pay the MPS fee at building permit issuance and the MPS administrative fee at the time of building permit application. If option I is chosen, then the following note shall be shown on the final short plat: MPS FEE NOTICE: Ali fees required by King County code 14,75, Mitigation Payment System (MPS) have been paid. If option 2 is chosen, then the following note shall be shown on the final short plat: MPS FEE NOTICE: This short plat is'subject to King County Code No. 14.75, King County Road Mitigation Payment System (MPS). The MPS fees plus the MPS administrative fee shall be paid at the time of building permit application at the rate in effect at that time. 10. State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA) This short subdivision was exempt from the provision of the State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA). 11. Other Considerations Preliminary approval of this application does not limit the applicant's responsibility to obtain any required permit or license from the State or other regulatory body. This may include obtaining a forest practice permit from the Washington State Department of Natural Resources for tree removal. t D� DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPNLNt ANU tnWtui+Nen�w aen n�.ca - 4.M.N Dr _.,,._ dry of 22r IXW4ne apa d uJ. T 14y of .. �0� x I �•�`� SCAU E:- _ a U. ew+tor ai..wn wr+o, .. - PORTION OF . E." ,.,„ , w.., 00e700-01ew NE 1/4 OF SW 1/4 of SEC 29.rft 23 N.RG 5 L AK I HOUSE � 31l s aeTeii•4a•E --7'"'� . SE 1721�f0 $'TREE7 1 SURVEY NOTES 114➢ UWP.. 1AKON TOTAL STAIM OTWIOWA ,y9u1lY 1T I `. I ft METHOD U5Fgi � McAUREonICHTSS AD AN= SAC W2-130-000 DATE OF SURAE'd APItl, 2003 m= or eEr18Na Npew•flt SE irle swm MT OF AID" FAN H(L 5 4 ', T T •.�� F II �', .I I •• -e ARlf: Im t I III leaf REY,- Roo-% (Sow WODO 1 7,610. .4R ' ..... .I 'i OWNER/DEVELOPER 1 1 • I IIE" NOY AND MORENY NCY s5o3 T5sth AVE SE BFLW6 0006 3nr�42& - bi I )i r r_ snow IF LAND SURV�YQR ,`'�•, '�` . ' � •'�' ••TWMA ENWEERS*!AID SURVEYORS -SUITE I t m I W32 3 191.t PLACE E-ID2' I .3 1 t I •� S L I I KEN-. 51-0665TON .08032 _ ,- _ _ _ _ 1 i •�--._ i aaTO'4r \ 1. '11 ZONING INFORMATION . t t W • r' $ 2iy TOTAL ACREAGE 0.41 'ACRES WTS 3 LOTS �� f ZOrll; RE50l . Ifi ROAD AREA 0 !<,OT 1 8 I H 91TTI'4d' I4 j, SMALLEST LOT 3410 IF PAOI USE SINGLE HOME i SOL TYPE SOE. TYPE ALOEftOMD00 A G DOD 9. F e.62i .q.R . - I ORNNAGE WELL DRAIIED YEGE7A:ON GRASS . 0.15: t } 1 1 I �y,! LEGENo . •v f j. ,.i j • I I g I e { 0 00 (TYPE 1) ° TELEPHONE TIW I� .. I I _.: 3.cIk...I. $0 %WTAKY =WER MH S1GN ��TREE H WATER VALVE �. ;' I J, •-"��� RW aeFa', I I ! ;C7� WATER METER/sEAWCF DECIDUOUS -IRE . ` _ '', � ~' -'_- FIRE K%aRAKT 'o MAR DO% a UTNTY POLE - M6BT6• 12-7 _ PI' y ® + FK NAIL F GUY TKRC (I) ArgN IN Gl�/ 3' WATER —^ MAW kA57]IElR f NO.4513s'15 ^, �}I' � �, I , Y so, .RomRECCR0ING -' • ...._ AS NOTED / E .. Ex HOUSE I I LEGAL. DESCRIPTI LOft AS PER NIOVWXE CP ATS, Pam � 411 1 �ll �Y� 4 ".. PLAT40 PLAOF P@ s.OF CIXAf1Y 1 V1 ATE IN THE ODUHTY OF KNO, STATE OF' W/SIANGTON. ..... $e IWO $ _ - - 6 - K a DF.E3, . . .. il wtY$Y E. ice' ls' 0j/YOl10) • .1 LAND SURVEYOR'S CER [IF)CATE NGY SHORT PLAT � PW s P{at c°rr.atly r.prsN t$ a .t..,.y mae. py �TOUAIA ENc1 17003 105t AVE SE.15 f,m. er undx my de- Al oanfort110110. Alth th• dt:rL.4ND STIR RENTON WA. 98055 Inquimm.nts eT the pp,.p,l.t. St°t. 'and County Statub and tl7 .- I 00.T ...4 99utM "m YLaq- Scram [-tOR • .D.G W DNN. GY DATE JOD H0. 0 77 .,rpht.4:.i.•: �70`ioi./So'{�/V �� RANT FEBRDARY SDOS a3i-Q0,_Q7t ow cNRn. OY SCALE SHEET CwilReol. No. ...._.......... uNT 1' _ 21Y t aP t e ATT�AG i 9 E T . Transmitted to the following Parties of Record for short plat L03SO031: James Donaldson 17003 105`I' Ave SE Renton, WA 98055 Rebecca Lind, City of Renton 1055 S. Grady Way Renton, WA 98055 Tim McCannon 17007 105`h Ave SE Renton, WA 98055 Tom Touma, Touma Engineers 6632 191" Place, #E-102 Kent, WA 98032 Fereshteh Dehkordi, Project Manager I1, DDES Land Use Services Division Curt Foster, Sr. Engineer, DDES Land Use Services Division Rich Hudson, Program Manager III, DDES Land Use Services Division ATTACHMENT A RIGHT TO APPEAL This action may be appealed in writing to the King County Hearing Examiner, with a fee of $250.00 (check payable to King County Office of Finance). As required by KCC 20.20.090 and 20.24.090, the appeal period shall be fourteen (14) calendar days and shall commence on the third day after the notice of decision is mailed. Filing an appeal requires actual delivery to the King County Land Use Services Division prior to the close of business (4:30 p.m.) on the date due. Prior mailing is not sufficient if actual receipt by the Division does not occur within the applicable time period. The Examiner does not have authority to extend the time period unless the Division is not open on the specified closing date, in which event delivery prior to the close of business on the next business day is sufficient to meet the filing requirement. If a timely Notice of Appeal has been filed, the appellant shall file a statement of appeal within a 21-day calendar period commencing three days after the notice of decision is mailed. The statement of appeal shall identify the decision being appealed (including file number) and the alleged errors in that decision. The statement of appeal shall state: 1) specific reasons why the decision should be reversed or modified; and 2) the harm suffered or anticipated by the appellant, and the relief sought. The scope of an appeal shall be based on matters or issues raised in the statement of appeal. Failure to timely file a notice of appeal, appeal fee, or statement of appeal deprives the Examiner of jurisdiction to consider the appeal. Appeals must be submitted to the Department of Development and Environmental Services, addressed as follows: LAND USE APPEAL Land Use Services Division Department of Development and Environmental Services BlackRiver Corporate Park 900 Oakesdale Avenue Southwest Renton, WA 98055-1219 A request for a pre -hearing conference may be made by any party. For more information regarding appeal proceedings and pre -hearing conferences, please contact the Office of the Examiner for a Citizens' Guide to the Examiner hearings and/or read KCC 20.20 and 20.24. LU j O IF YA "X- 1 X N BB'18'48• W 12831' ki I 274r + I OT I \ I I 1 3 I sa TOTAL 74 SQ FT (DA7 Aq I f II S B 1 � I - - � r I - NBB'18'4B'YY - I RA I 11 8ET6AL}L f I it�---------- I� ,I 6 ; I r I a $ETBM AaT _ _ - _ _ I _ _ _ - _ _ _ - - - - it ��I II I � ��• - - N 178.38' 'B�C4W - --1------ , - - co-w - w f ATER FORCE MAIN N 88'16.48• A1EIt #UUTL EASEll ' r I - - - - - -,Y- - - - - -A _ rAL1207 SO • (0.L SETBAM I I TOTAL 558750 FT {O.1 ) I � � I I II I I Si C4r0lIfROI OLE OITTTAIL `� B I 1 IiII I rCATCHLVISIN ►o NORWEED OUPLE70D PDMPINO STATION MODEL SCIM I I i TOTAL 4970 SO FT (0. AC7 1 I r 1 ++I I I I r (WCLUDWG P.kT. L --——— _ — — — —— �i I 1 � I1 3 -L-- - -- - - -- -- -- - -- b BJ 64 LF. OF BSALV u� METAL OETELfI1l1N P0�E r rr'r r r rrrr rirrrr r r r VAULT WO{21 b' PORTS 3 HOUSE ' ' DRAINAGE SITE PLAN 2W4SCA E- 1`MTT 11z17SC4LE 1 p-0 0' 1v 20' gap _ 00.E-2X(Tt E E.•1959, SEE SHEET C-2 — canes TnArrsLrlaN TO T Sff TYP. EA OF PROPL�IY RIM EL 710'M fsOn� fREH4 I 1 �— I Ir-01 PROPOWD CONCRETE SMWAK' TRAm%nM SEE SHEET III 1I1 POP.D CONCRETE SIDEWALK RMAGE liII F _1L II �qt I I III pp � I -T(E)r II II II I II II F I � NEW ASPHALT IN-FLL I I SEE SHEETG3 II ` I I NEW ORNEMY Timm* N, I I sm SHEET o3 \ f 11 I P WATER SUPPLY II { II II II I wATERSLIPxY II � II II II II II II +I II II I I PROPOSED SANfTARY SEWER it MANHOLE II I! II II I I M C& TYPE 1 I I RIM. L�.�2HSV I I � N.lE�199.�{f27 + I s.IE�I9eaT{72) ICI E W-.I 29' (4j BOT. EL-19T.0 - M SANRAr1r SEWER or COW{I1CvATE D II HIE � II I I (E) CB -TYPE 1 RI4. E l I I E E•79T.99{4y WAE-197.57(NEW 12) (E) 4• CoRtI l�EO II HOPE 1 II I II !I I1 II I ICI II \ �I I (q OPEN DTra! II II � �u OWNER / DEVELOPER TENG AND MOONY NGY 55M 15M AVE SE BELLEVUE, WA 96006 206.351.1994 LAND SURVEYOR TOUMA ENGINEERS AND LAND SURVEYORS SS32 S Ill PLACE SURE E-102 KENT, WAW= 425.251.0665 OFFICE ENGINEER CORNERSTONE ENGINEERING INC. 10M DENNY WAY SUITE S00 SEATTLE, WA 98109 208.250.7306 OFFICE 20SA94.11MFAA ZONING INFORMATION TOTALACERAGE 0A1 ACRES TOTAL LOTS 3 LOTS ZONE RBSO ROAD AREA B SMALLEST LOT 970 $.F, (0,11 AC) PROPOSED USE SOIL TYPE ALDERWOOD ApC DRAINAGE WELL DRAINED VEGETATION GRASS PARCEL NUMBER 00870DO133 SECTION, TOWNSHIP, AND RANGE PORTIpI OF NE L4 c SN lA/ of S. 29 T.;23 N. Ill W-M. WATER & SEWER UTILITY SOOS GiEEK WATER A SEWER DISTRICT 14616 SE 1921ND $T. RENTON WA O%rA (M) MD40M BASIS OF BEARING Hill lr E. SE 172W STREET PLAT OF AKER'S FARM N0. 5 BENCHMARK S91i1 AT SE CORNER OF PROPERTY ROM ELEV . 200.39 ISOOS CREEK) OCT o s 2306 K.C. D.D.E.S. mull NGY S, ! SITE IMP, PLC 17003105TH AVr - RENTON. WA Sill KING COUNTY I ISSUED F-0R ISSUED FOR DDES REVIEW :PLANS PREPARED BY: LyC tOFRNEFi3TQr4p- I4207IEWMST.Stll PHDIE42S4IIf.1732 WOMMILI WA9A072 FAIL- 4MV.17M L34AL c4lpmmemwlprml :DHAWNSY:=CHK.: APV.: IRA SUC MWO :EQUIPMENT: =ENSURE: MRATANG TITLE: CONCEPTUAL DRAINAGE SITE PLAN :DRAWING INFORMATION: DO NOT SCALE DRAWINGS. CONTRACTOR MUST VERIFY ALL DIMENSIONS AND ADVISE CONSULTANTS OF ANY ERRORS AND OMISSIONS. ALL PREVIOUS ISSUES OF THIS DRAWING ARE SUPERSEDED BY THE LATEST REVISION. THE INFORMATION CONTAINED IN THIS SET OF DOCUMENTS IS PROPRIETARY BY NATURE ANY USE OR DISCLOSURE OTHER THAN WHICH IS RELATED TO NAMED CLIENT STRICTLY PROHIBREo. 'DMTMNc ONUMMBER REVISON: O IV 4' CEMENT CONCRETE CEMENT CONCRETE CURB 6 GUTTER SEE DWG. NO.34)02 BDEWALK 5` NOTE 3 GAS LINES ON SOUTH 6 WEST SIDE OF STREET. SEE SEC. 8.OZA PAVEME! rt WIDTH NOTE4 SM. SEWER ON SOUTH a WEST SIDE OF STREET. SEE SEC. 8.02C sa' ,..�. \SUBGRADE SLOPE 0.02 FTJFT. ADDITIONAL TREATMEM MAYBE REOIJQRED DEPENDING ON SOIL CONDITIONS. SEE SEC. 4.02 5 4.C3 CRUSHED SURFACING BASE COURSE MOTET CRUSHED SURFACING TOP COURSE NOTE 1 CLASS B ASPHALT CONCRETE NOTE 1 1. THIS DRAWING ILLUSTRATES ATYPICAL ASPHALT CONCRETE ROAD SECTION, ALTERNATIVE It ACTUAL SURFACING DESIGN FOR ARTERIALS AND COMMERCIAL ACCESS STREETS SHALL BE BASED ON SOILS AND TRAFFIC ANALYSIS PER SEC. 4,03. DESIGN FOR RESIDENTIAL ACCESS SMALL BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH SECS. 4.01 AND 4.02- 2. GRADES: MINIMUM 0.5% MAXIMUM SEE SECS. 202, 203, 2DO, AND 2.11. 3. SIDEWALKS SHALL BE 5 FF. WIDE IN BUSINESS DISTFJM AND 5.5 FT. WIDE ON ARTERIALS ff NEXT TO TRAFFIC LANE, 5 FT. WIDE IF NEXT TO PARKING OR BIKE LANE, OR BEHIND P ANTWG STRIP SEE SECTION 3.=. 4. FOR WIDTHS OF PAVEMENT, SHOULDER AND RIGHT-OF-WAY, SEE SECS. 202, 2.03. AND 204. 5. FOR CLEARANCE OF UTILITY POLES SEE SEC. 8.020 AND DWG, NO.6A01. S. SEE CHAPTER 7 FOR CATCH BASIN ADD STORM SEWER LOCATIONS, 7. SEE SEC. 5.02 FOR SIDE SLOPE REOUI2EiMENTS. ROADISIDEWALK SECTION a PLANTING STRIP DUMMY JOINT o❑ U 1114"V' GROOVE DUMMY JOINT @ MAX. IS C-C -- EXPANSION JOINT ALONG CURB 114' N' GROOVE @ MAX. S C-C B VERTICAL CURB & SIDEWALK EXPANSION JOINT �I SECTION B-B CURB & SIDEWALK JOINTS Sfi TO" Y�UD FRAME MA GRATE NOTE 3 SEE SEC. 7.06 AND APPLICABLE UAW. UTILITY POLES PLACED BACK OF SIDEWALK - NOTE 5 MIN ir A 5• RISER SECTION 15' •• i gMw�m WATER LINES ON NORTH d EAST �A w SIDE OF ROAD, SEE SECB.02A c a CATCH BASIN a STORM SEWERS ITYP.) f NOTE 6 it 12RISER SECTION 1 xnwewae B EXPANSION JOINT DUMMY JOINT 3-001 iva�pi GUTTER CATCH BASIN SECTION A -A 'RECAST BASE SECTION MEASUREMENT AT THE TOP OF THE BASE) PLAN NOTES: 1, SET TO GRADE AND CONSTRUCT ROAD AND GUTTER TO BE FLUSH WITH FRAME 2. SEE SEC. 3.04 FOR JOINT REQUIREMENTS. NOTES: 1. CURB INLET TO BE CONSTRUCTED IN ACCORDANCE WITH AM C475 5 C890 UNLESS OTHERWISE SHOWN ON PLANS OR NOTED IN THE WSDOTIAPWA STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS. 2. AS AN ACCEPTABLE ALTERNATIVE TO REBAR, WELDED WIRE FABRIC FIAV NG A MIN. AREA OF 0.12 SQUARE INCHES PER FOOT MAY BE USED. WELDED WIRE FABRIC SHALL COMPLY TO ASTM PA07 W.SHTTO M 221). WIRE FABRIC SHALL NOT BE PLACED IN KNOCKOUTS. 3. ALL REINFORCED CAST -IN -PLACE CONCRETE SMALL 5E CLASS 4000. 4. PRECAST BASES SHALL BE FURNISHED WITH CUTOUTS OR KNOCKOUTS, KNOCKOUTS SHALL HAVE A WALL THICKNESS OF 2• MIN. ALL PIPE SHALL BE INSTALLED IN FACTORY PROVIDED KNOCKOUTS. UNUSED KNOCKOUTS NEED NOT BE GROUTED IF WALL IS LEFT INTACT. 5. KNIOCKOLII OR CUTOUT HOLE SIZE IS EQUAL TO PIPE OUTER DIAM. PLUS CATCH BASIN WALL THICKNESS. e. ROUND KNOCKOUTS MAY BE ON ALL 4 SIDES WITH MAX. OMM. OF 17'. 7. THE MAX, DEPTH FROM THE FINISHED GRADE TO THE PIPE INVERT IS S� 5. THE TAPER ON THE SIDES OF THE PRECAST BASE SECTION AND RISER SECTION SWILL NOT EXCEED lrZIFT. 8. CONCRETE INLET FRAME AND GRATES SHALL BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS AND MEET THE STRENGTH REQUIREMENTS OF FEDERAL SPECIFICATION RR-F40D. MATING SURFACES SHALL BE FINISHED TO ASSURE NON -ROCKING FIT WITH ANY COVER POSITION. 10. FRAME AND GRATE MAY BE INSTALLED WITH FLANGE DOWN OR CAST INTO RISF - CURB INLET CURB GUTTER SECTION B-B THROUGH -CURB INLET FRAME & GRATE WITH VERTICAL CURB INSTALLATION 2-012 DUMMY JOINTS CATCH BASIN 2-017 PROJECT INFORMATION: NGY SHORT PLAT SITE IMPROVEMENT PLAN 17003 105TH AVE SE RENTON, WA 99055 KING COUNTY ISSUED FOR CISSUED FOR DDES REVIEW REV: =DATE:=DESCRIPTION: B 1010A l0! WUEDFM - M1I1D RFVWW A 04l02104 - Mm DDES R� PLANS PREPARED BY: CORNC�151roNE EO k= HE W M ST, WM 2D0 MCW1 ,!EA!7.1M MIDODWALL RANI1 TAX'' 4M4I.D34 D4AIl al�,gr<ga.qpmn IDRAWNBY:.=C,HK.:----=APV.: DRA SUC MIND EQUIPMENT: r I - - - - -7]l LK:ENSIARE: �yY, W. O< Jt vm �D � S � o 1ZZD4 FB Aa,�4, E]PIaES 07115M DRAWING TIRE: DRAINAGE DETAILS DRAWING INFORMATION: DO NOT SCALE DRAWINGS, CONTRACTOR MUST VERIFY ALL DIMENSIONS AND ADVISE CONSULTANTS OF ANY ERRORS AND OMISSIONS. ALL PREVIOUS ISSUES OF THIS DRAWING ARE SUPERSEDED BY THE LATEST REVISION. THE INFORMATION CONTAMM IN THIS SET OF DOCUMENTS IS PROPRIETARY BY NATURE ANY USE OR DISCLOSURE OTHER THAN WHICH IS RELATED TO NAMED CLIENT IS STRICTLYPROHBDED. DRAWING NUMBER REVjlISI��ON: C - 2V co V CEMENT CONCRETE B'-0" 'IDEWALK AND RAMP MIN MATCH EXISTING OR 12 PROPOSED SURFACE ASPHALT SECTION A -A RESIDENTIAL 10'-0' MtN. 20'GU' MAX. COMMJINDUSTR. 25.0' MIN. 35'-0' MAX. NOTES: 1. FOR WIDTHS OF SIDEWALK SEE SEC. 3.02 2. FOR WIDTHS OF PAVEMENT AND SHOULDER SEE SECS. 2.02.203, AND 2.04. 3. SHOULDER SHALL BE SURFACED AS REQUIRED BY SECTIONS 3.07 AND 4.01. IF PAVED, SHOULDER SLOPE SHALL MATCH CROWN SLOPE OR .02 FTJFF. 4. FOR CURB AND SIDEWALK JOINTS SEE DWG. NO.3-001. 5. TRANSITION RAMP SHALL BE TEXTURED BY IMPRINT OF METAL GRID WrrH 112' SPACING. CEMENT CONCRETE SIDEWALK TRANSITION TO ASPHALT SHOULDER 6, VARIES 5-Er VARIES RIGHT OF WAY LINE MATCH EXISTING DRIVEWAY GRADE �-- CEMENT CONCRETE DRIVEWAY 5' THICK SECTION A -A 4-004 SIDEWALK PLANTING STRIP, IF ANY NOTES: 1. COMMERCUUJINDUSTWAL DRIVEWAYS WIDER THAN W MAY BE APPROVED BY THE ENGINEER CONSIDERING TRAFFIC SAFETY AND NEEDS OF THE ACTIVITY SERVED. ALL COMMERCIALANDUSTRIAL DRIVEWAYS SHALL HAVE AN EXPANSION JOINT LOCATED MID -WIDTH. SEE SEC. 3.04. 2. SEE SECTION 3.01. 3. SEE SEC- 4.01 FOR SURFACING REQUIREMENTS. CURB & GUTTER SECTION DRIVEWAY 3-004 PROJECT WFORMATION: NGY SHORT PLAT SITE IMPROVEMENT PLAN 17003 105TH AVE SE RENTON, WA9M KING COUNTY ISSUED FOR CISSUED FOR DOES REVIEW REV. =DATE: DES('.RIPTION: �BY:=CK Q101 m1m ��W A wr1¢ra ��W — Ilno PLANS PREPARED BY: Si:rONERnTTT�COVE 14I011¢UMST,%m210 pn w4254T.IT32 M 00MVIIE. WA NM FAX 47S4T.1734 DAw w*cvwwm4 = DRAWN BY: =CHC: APV.: ORA &UC MWO EOUI'RIENT: 11 LIOENSIIRE: W. 0; '?ray, S =s q 'FVO� .pn lIs ?�4. F�84)NAL fN� EXPIRES 071159E DRAWING TITLE: DRAINAGE DETAILS DRAWING IWORMATION: DO NOT SCALE DRAWINGS. CONTRACTOR MUST VERIFY ALL DWIENSMKS AND ADVISE CONSULTANTS OF ANY ERRORS AND OMISSIONS. ALL PREVIOUS&WES OF THIS DRAWING ARE SUPERSEDED BY THE LATEST REVAION. THE INFORMATION OOKTARIED IN THIS SET OF DOCLVAEN S IS PROPRIEYARY BY NATURE, ANY USE OR DISCLOSURE OTHER THAN WHICH IS KELATED TO NAMED CLIENT IS STRICTLY PROHIBITED. DRAWING NUMBER REV(1ISKOM: Co3 V L" CEMENT CONCRETE B -0' 'SIDEWALK AND RAMP MIN MATCH EXISTING OR PROPOSED SURFACE 12 —�1 ASPHALT SECTION A -A RESIDENTIAL 10'-0" MIN. 20'-0" MAX COMMAINDUSTR- 25'-O' MIN. 35'-(" MAX. Iz NOTES: 1. FOR WIDTHS OF SIDEWALK SEE SEC. 3.02- 2. FOR WIDTHS OF PAVEMENT AND SHOULDER SEE SECS. 2.02. 203. AND 2.04. 3. SHOULDER SHALL BE SURFACED AS REQUIRED BY SECTIONS 3.07 AND 4.01. IF PAVED, SHOULDER SLOPE SHALL MATCH CROWN SLOPE OR.02 FTJFf. 4. FOR CURB AND SIDEWALK JOINTS SEE DWG, NO. 3-001. 5. TRANSITION RAMP SHALL BE TEXTURED BY IMPRINT OF METAL GRID WITH 1f2'SPACING. CEMENT CONCRETE SIDEWALK TRANSITION TO ASPHALT SHOULDER RIGHT OF WAY LINE CUTAPER 6 VARIES 5,$, VARIES RIGHT OF WAY LINE MATCH EXISTING DRIVEWAY GRADE CEMENT CONCRETE DRIVEWAY 5 THICK SECTION A -A CURB TAPER . . ' .' 4-004 SIDEWALK PLANTING STRIP, IF ANY NOTES: 1. COMMERCWIINDUSTRIAL DRIVEWAYS WIDER THAN 35 MAY BE APPROVED BY THE ENGINEER CONSIDERING TRAFFIC SAFETY AND NEEDS OF THE ACTIVITY SERVED, ALL COMMERCLAL)INDUSTRIAL DRIVEWAYS SHALL HAVE AN EXPANSION JOINT LOCATED MID -WIDTH. SEE SEC. 3.04. 2. SEE SECTION 3.01. 3. SEE SEC. 4.01 FOR SURFACING REQUIREMENTS, CURB & GUTTER SECTION DRIVEWAY 3-004 PROJECT NFORMATTON: NGY SHORT PLAT SITE IMPROVEMENT PLAN 17003 105TH AVE SE RENTON. WA 98M KING COUNTY Ll ISSUED FOR CISSUED FOR DDES REVIEW REV:DAM DESCRIPTION::=CK B tOrmrm D �W — MwO p ara¢ror ISSUED — MM7 OW OES REVIE PLANS BY: ///PREPARED �COFUVEPll1T'ONE �O cnol.+cEa�wc. �wc. i M!E 210Tx ST, WIE 2W RM 42i4A-1T32 MD0DKdif,NACI n FAX 4E.462.11U IAWL' alQarmm"Va M=CHK,: APV.: IDRAWN DRA SUC MWO EWIPMENT: LICENSLRTE: K W.<s oy 4 �O^p ,p, 4irg�TT?ti� �`6V. �a NAi ENa E—WS OR115dB DRAWING TILE- DRAINAGE DETAILS DRAWING INFORMATION: DO NOT SCALE DRAWINGS. CONTRACTOR MUST VERIFY ALL OIMENSKINS AND ADVISE CONSULTANTS OF ANY ERRORS AND OMISSKWS. ALL PREVIOUS ISSUES OF THIS DRAWING ARE SUPERSEDED BY THE LATEST REVISKIN,THE INFORMATION CONTAINED IN THIS SET OF DOCUMENTS IS PROPRIETARY BY NATURE. ANY USE OR DISCLOSURE OTHER THAN WHICH IS RELATED TO NAMED CLIENT 99 STRICTLY PROH®RED. DRAWING NUMBER REVISION: C-3 B GENERAL NOTES 1. ALL CONSTRUCTION SHALL BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE KING COUNTY CODE (KCC), KING COUNTY ROAD STANDARDS (KCRS), KING COUNTY SURFACE WATER DESIGN MANUAL (KCSWDM) AND THE CONDITIONS OF PRELIMINARY SUBDIVISION APPROVAL. IT SHALL BE THE SOLE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE APPLICANT AND THE PROFESSIONAL CIVIL ENGINEER TO CORRECT ANY ERROR, OMISSION, OR VARIATION FROM THE ABOVE REQUIREMENTS FOUND IN THESE PLANS. ALL CORRECTIONS SHALL BE AT NO ADDITIONAL COST OR LIABILITY TO KING COUNTY. 2. THE DESIGN ELEMENTS WITHIN THESE PLANS HAVE BEEN REVIEWED ACCORDING TO THE KING COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT AND ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES (DOES) ENGINEERING REVIEW CHECKLIST, SOME ELEMENTS MAY HAVE BEEN OVERLOOKED OR MISSED BY THE DOES PLAN REVIEWER. ANY VARIANCE FROM ADOPTED STANDARDS IS NOT ALLOWED UNLESS SPECIFICALLY APPROVED BY KING COUNTY PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION. 3. APPROVAL OF THIS ROAD, GRADING, AND DRAINAGE PLAN DOES NOT CONSTITUTE AN APPROVAL OF ANY OTHER CONSTRUCTION (E.G., DOMESTIC WATER CONVEYANCE, SEWER CONVEYANCE. GAS. ELECTRICAL, ETC.). 4. BEFORE ANY CONSTRUCTION OR DEVELOPMENT ACTIVITY, A PRECONSTRUCTTON MEETING MUST BE HELD BETWEEN THE DOES LAND USE INSPECTION SECTION, THE APPLICANT. AND THE APPLICANTS CONSTRUCTION REPRESENTATIVE. 5. A COPY OF THESE APPROVED PLANS MUST BE ON THE JOB SITE WHENEVER CONSTRUCTION IS IN PROGRESS. 6. CONSTRUCTION NOISE SHALL BE LIMITED IN ACCORDANCE WITH KING COUNTY CODE (SECTION 12.88): NORMALLY, THIS IS 7A.M, TO 10 P.M. ON WEEKDAYS AND 9 AM. TO W P.M. ON WEEKENDS. 7. IT SHALL BE THE APPLICANITSICONTRACTOKS RESPONSIBILITY TO OBTAIN ALL CONSTRUCTION EASEMENTS NECESSARY BEFORE INITIATING OFF -SITE WORK WITHIN THE ROAD RIGHT-OF-WAY. 8. FRANCHISED UTILITIES OR OTHER INSTALLATIONS THAT ARE NOT SHOWN ON THESE APPROVED PLANS SHALL NOT BE CONSTRUCTED UNLESS AN APPROVED SET OF PLANS THAT MEETS ALL REQUIREMENTS OF KCRS CHAPTER 8 IS SUBMITTED TO THE DOES LAND USE INSPECTION SECTION THREE DAYS PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION. 9. DATUM SHALL BE NAVD 1988 UNLESS OTHERWISE APPROVED BY DDES. 10. GROUNDWATER SYSTEM CONSTRUCTION SHALL BE WITHIN A RIGHT-OF-WAY OR APPROPRIATE DRAINAGE EASEMENT, BUT NOT UNDERNEATH THE ROADWAY SECTION, ALL GROUNDWATER SYSTEMS MUST BE CONSTRUCTED IN ACCORDANCE WITH SECTION B1 3.02 OF THE APWA STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS. 11. ALL UTILITY TRENCHES SHALL BE SACKFILLED AND COMPACTED TO 95 PERCENT DENSITY. 12. ALL ROADWAY SUBGRADE SHALL BE BACKFILLED AND COMPACTED TO 95 PERCENT DENSITY (WSDOT 2-06.3). 13. OPEN CUTTING OF EXISTING ROADWAYS IS NOT ALLOWED UNLESS SPECIFICALLY APPROVED BY DOES AND NOTED ON THESE APPROVED PLANS. ANY OPEN CUT SHALL BE RESTORED IN ACCORDANCE WITH KCRS 8.03(B)3. 14. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR PROVIDING ADEQUATE SAFEGUARDS, SAFETY DEVICES, PROTECTIVE EQUIPMENT, FLAGGERS, AND ANY OTHER NEEDED ACTIONS TO PROTECT THE LIFE, HEALTH, AND SAFETY OF THE PUBLIC, AND TO PROTECT PROPERTY IN CONNECTION WITH THE PERFORMANCE OF WORK COVERED BY THE CONTRACTOR. ANY WORK WITHIN THE TRAVELED RIGHT-OF-WAY THAT MAY INTERRUPT NORMAL TRAFFIC FLOW SHALL REQUIRE AT LEAST ONE FLAGGER FOR EACH LANE OF TRAFFIC AFFECTED. SECTION 1-07.23, -TRAFFIC CONTROL.- OF THE WSDOT STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS SHALL APPLY IN ITS ENTIRETY. DRAINAGE NOTES 1. PROOF OF LIABILITY INSURANCE SHALL BE SUBMITTED TO ODES PRIOR TO THE PRECONSTRUCTION MEETING (KCC 9.04.100.13). 2. ALL PIPE AND APPURTENANCES SHALL BE LAID IN ACCORDANCE WITH WSDOT 7-08. THIS SHALE. INCLUDE LEVELING AND COMPACTING THE TRENCH BOTTOM, THE TOP OF THE FOUNDATION MATERIAL AND ANY REQUIRED BEDDING TO A UNIFORM GRADE SO THAT THE ENTIRE DRAINAGE FACILITY IS SUPPORTED BY A UNIFORMLY DENSE UNYIELDING BASE. 3. STEEL PIPE SHALL BE GALVANIZED AND HAVE ASPHALT TREATMENT #1 OR BETTER INSIDE AND OUTSIDE (KCRS 7.03). 4. ALL DRAINAGE STRUCTURES, SUCH AS CATCH BASINS AND MANHOLES, NOT LOCATED WITHIN A TRAVELED ROADWAY OR SIDEWALK SHALL HAVE SOLID LOCKING LIDS. ALL DRAINAGE STRUCTURES ASSOCIATED WITH A PERMANENT RETENTIONIDETENTION FACILITY SHALL HAVE SOLID LOCKING LIDS (KCRS 7.05). 5. ALL CATCH BASIN GRATES SHALL CONFORM TO KCRS DRAWING NUMBERS 2-013, 2-018.2-019, OR 2-020, AND SHALL INCLUDE THE STAMPING -OUTFALL TO STREAM, DUMP NO POLLUTANTS" AND -PROPERTY OF KING COUNTY" (KCRS 7.05). 6. ALL DRIVEWAY CULVERTS LOCATED WITHIN KING COUNTY RIGHT-OF-WAY SHALL BE OF SUFFICIENT LENGTH TO PROVIDE A MINIMUM 3:1 SLOPE FROM THE EDGE OF THE DRIVEWAY TO THE BOTTOM OF THE DITCH. CULVERTS SWILL HAVE BEVELED END SECTIONS TO MATCH THE SIDE SLOPE (KCRS 7.03(L), DRAWING NO.2-001). 7. ROCK FOR EROSION PROTECTION OF DITCHES. WHERE REQUIRED, MUST BE OF SOUND QUARRY ROCK, PLACED TO A DEPTH OF ONE FOOT (1'), AND MUST MEET THE FOLLOWING SPECIFICATIONS: 100 % MUST PASS THE 8' SIEVE, 40% MAXIMUM CAN PASS THE 3" SIEVE AND 10% MAXIMUM CAN PASS THE 3J4' SIEVE. INSTALLATION SHALL BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH KCRS 7.02(B), DRAWING NO.2-024. B. DRAINAGE OUTLETS (STUB -OUTS) SHALL BE PROVIDED FOR EACH INDIVIDUAL LOT, EXCEPT FOR THOSE LOTS APPROVED FOR INFILTRATION BY KING COUNTY. STUB -OUTS SHALL CONFORM TO THE FOLLOWING: A) EACH OUTLET SHALL BE SUITABLY LOCATED AT THE LOWEST ELEVATION ON THE LOT, SO AS TO SERVICE ALL FUTURE ROOF DOWNSPOUTS AND FOOTING DRAINS, DRIVEWAYS, YARD DRAINS, AND ANY OTHER SURFACE OR SUBSURFACE DRAINS NECESSARY TO RENDER THE LOTS SUITABLE FOR THEIR INTENDED USE. EACH OUTLET SHALL HAVE FREE -FLOWING, POSITIVE DRAINAGE TO AN APPROVED STORMWATER CONVEYANCE SYSTEM OR TO AN APPROVED OUTFALL LOCATION. B) OUTLETS ON EACH LOT SHALL BE LOCATED WITH A FIVE -FOOT -HIGH, 2' X 4- STAKE MARKED -STORM- OR -DRAIN-. THE STUB OUT SHALL EXTEND ABOVE SURFACE LEVEL. BE VISIBLE, AND BE SECURED TO THE STAKE. C) PIPE MATERIAL SHALL CONFORM TO UNDERDRAIN SPECIFICATIONS DESCRIBED IN KCRS 7,04. IF NON-METALLIC, THE PIPE SHALL CONTAIN WIRE OR OTHER ACCEPTABLE DETECTION. D) DRAINAGE EASEMENTS ARE REQUIRED FOR DRAINAGE SYSTEMS DESIGNED TO CONVEY FLOWS THROUGH INDIVIDUAL LOTS. E) THE APPLICANTICONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR COORDINATING THE LOCATIONS OF ALL STUB -OUT CONVEYANCE LINES WITH RESPECT TO UTILITIES (E.G.. POWER, GAS, TELEPHONE, TELEVISION, ETC.). F) ALL INDIVIDUAL STUB -OUTS SHALL BE PRIVATELY OWNED AND MAINTAINED BY THE LOT HOMEOWNER. EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL NOTES 1. APPROVAL OF THIS EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL (ESC) PLAN ]IDES NOT CONSTITUTE AN APPROVAL OF PERMANENT ROAD OR DRAINAGE DESIGN (E.G., SIZE AND LOCATION OF ROADS, PIPES, RESTRICTORS, CHANNELS, RETENTION FACILITIES, UTILITIES, ETC.). 2. THE IMPLEMENTATION OF THESE ESC PLANS AND THE CONSTRUCTION, MAINTENANCE, REPLACEMENT, AND UPGRADING OF THESE ESC FACILITIES IS THE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE APPLICANTIESC SUPERVISOR UNTIL ALL CONSTRUCTION IS APPROVED. 3, THE BOUNDARIES OF THE CLEARING LIMITS SHOWN ON THIS PLAN SHALL BE CLEARLY FLAGGED BY A CONTINUOUS LENGTH OF SURVEY TAPE (OR FENCING, IF REQUIRED) PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION. DURING THE CONSTRUCTION PERIOD, NO DISTURBANCE BEYOND THE CLEARING LIMITS SHALL BE PERMITTED, THE CLEARING LIMITS SHALL BE MAINTAINED BY THE APPLICANT/ESC SUPERVISOR FOR THE DURATION OF CONSTRUCTION. 4. THE ESC FACILITIES SHOWN ON THIS PLAN MUST BE CONSTRUCTED PRIOR TO OR IN CONJUNCTION WITH ALL CLEARING AND GRADING SO AS TO ENSURE THAT THE TRANSPORT OF SEDIMENT TO SURFACE WATERS, DRAINAGE SYSTEMS. AND ADJACENT PROPERTIES IS MINIMIZED. 5. THE ESC FACILITIES SHOWN ON THIS PLAN ARE THE MINIMUM REQUIREMENTS FOR ANTICIPATED SITE CONDITIONS. DURING THE CONSTRUCTION PERIOD, THESE ESC FACILITIES SHALL BE UPGRADED AS NEEDED FOR UNEXPECTED STORM EVENTS AND MODIFIED TO ACCOUNT FOR CHANGING SITE CONDITIONS (E.G., ADDITIONAL SUMP PUMPS, RELOCATION OF DITCHES AND SILT FENCES, ETC.). 6. THE ESC FACILITIES SHALL BE INSPECTED DAILY BY THE APPLICANTIESC SUPERVISOR AND MAINTAINED TO ENSURE CONTINUED PROPER FUNCTIONING. WRITTEN RECORDS SHALL BE KEPT OF WEEKLY REVIEWS OF THE ESC FACILITIES DURING THE WET SEASON (OCT. 1 TO APRIL 30) AND OF MONTHLY REVIEWS DURING THE DRY SEASON (MAY 1 TO SEPT. 30). 7. ANY AREAS OF EXPOSED SOILS, INCLUDING ROADWAY EMBANKMENTS, THAT WILL NOT BE DISTURBED FOR TWO DAYS DURING THE WET SEASON OR SEVEN DAYS DURING THE DRY SEASON SHALL BE IMMEDIATELY STABILIZED WITH THE APPROVED ESC METHODS (E.G., SEEDING, MULCHING, PLASTIC COVERING, ETC.). 8. ANY AREA NEEDING ESC MEASURES NOT REQUIRING IMMEDIATE ATTENTION SHALL BE ADDRESSED WITHIN FIFTEEN (15) DAYS. 9. THE ESC FACILITIES ON INACTIVE SITES SHALL BE INSPECTED AND MAINTAINED A MINIMUM OF ONCE A MONTH OR WITHIN FORTY-EIGHT (48) HOURS FOLLOWING A STORM EVENT. 10. AT NO TIME SHALL MORE THAN ONE (1) FOOT OF SEDIMENT BE ALLOWED TO ACCUMULATE WITHIN A CATCH BASIN. ALL CATCH BASINS AND CONVEYANCE LINES SHALL BE CLEANED PRIOR TO PAVING. THE CLEANING OPERATION SHALL NOT FLUSH SEDIMENT -LADEN WATER INTO THE DOWNSTREAM SYSTEM. 11. STABILIZED CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCES AND ROADS SHALL BE INSTALLED AT THE BEGINNING OF CONSTRUCTION AND MAINTAINED FOR THE DURATION OF THE PROJECT. ADDITIONAL MEASURES. SUCH AS WASH PADS, MAY BE REQUIRED TO ENSURE THAT ALL PAVED AREAS ARE KEPT CLEAN FOR THE DURATION OF THE PROJECT. 12. ANY PERMANENT FLOW CONTROL FACILITY USED AS A TEMPORARY SETTLING BASIN SHALL BE MODIFIED WITH THE NECESSARY EROSION CONTROL MEASURES AND SHALL PROVIDE ADEQUATE STORAGE CAPACITY. IF THE FACILITY IS TO FUNCTION ULTIMATELY AS AN INFILTRATION SYSTEM, THE TEMPORARY FACILITY MUST BE GRADED SO THAT THE BOTTOM AND SIDES ARE AT LEAST THREE FEET ABOVE THE FINAL GRADE OF THE PERMANENT FACILITY. 13. WHERE STRAW MULCH FOR TEMPORARY EROSION CONTROL IS REQUIRED, IT SHALL BE APPLIED AT A MINIMUM THICKNESS OF 2 TO 3 INCHES. 14. PRIOR TO THE BEGINNING OF THE WET SEASON (OCT. 1). ALL DISTURBED AREAS SHALL BE REVIEWED TO IDENTIFY WHICH ONES CAN BE SEEDED IN PREPARATION FOR THE WINTER RAINS. DISTURBED AREAS SHALL BE SEEDED WITHIN ONE WEEK OF THE BEGINNING OF THE WET SEASON. A SKETCH MAP OF THOSE AREAS TO BE SEEDED AND THOSE AREAS TO REMAIN UNCOVERED SHALL BE SUBMITTED TO THE ODES INSPECTOR. THE ODES INSPECTOR CAN REQUIRE SEEDING OF ADDITIONAL AREAS IN ORDER TO PROTECT SURFACE WATERS, ADJACENT PROPERTIES, OR DRAINAGE FACILITIES. STRUCTURAL NOTES 1. THESE PLANS ARE APPROVED FOR STANDARD ROAD AND DRAINAGE IMPROVEMENTS ONLY. PLANS FOR STRUCTURES SUCH AS BRIDGES, VAULTS, AND RETAINING WALLS REQUIRE A SEPARATE REVIEW AND APPROVAL BY DOES PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION (KCC 16.04. 16.70. 1420). 2. ROCKERIES ARE CONSIDERED TO BE A METHOD OF BANK STABILIZATION AND EROSION CONTROL. ROCKERIES SHALL NOT BE CONSTRUCTED TO SERVE AS RETAINING WALLS. ALL ROCKERIES IN COUNTY ROAD RIGHT-QF-WAY SHALL BE CONSTRUCTED IN ACCORDANCE WITH KCRS DRAWING NUMBERS 5-004, S-005, 5-0D8, AND 5-007. ROCKERIES OUTSIDE OF ROAD RIGHT-OF-WAY SHALL BE CONSTRUCTED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE UNIFORM BUILDING CODE. RECOMMENDED CONSTRUCTION SEQUENCE 1. PRE -CONSTRUCTION MEETING. 2. FLAG OR FENCE CLEARING LIMITS. 3. POST NOTICE OF CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITY SIGN WITH NAME AND PHONE NUMBER OF ESC SUPERVISOR, 4. INSTALL CATCH BASIN PROTECTION IF REQUIRED. 5. GRADE AND INSTALL CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE($). 6. INSTALL PERIMETER PROTECTION (SILT FENCE, BRUSH BARRIER, ETC.). 7. CONSTRUCT SEDIMENT PONDS AND TRAPS. 8. GRADE AND STABILIZE CONSTRUCTION ROADS, 9. CONSTRUCT SURFACE WATER CONTROLS (INTERCEPTOR DIKES, PIPE SLOPE DRAINS, ETC.) SIMULTANEOUSLY WITH CLEARING AND GRADING FOR PROJECT DEVELOPMENT. 10. MAINTAIN EROSION CONTROL MEASURES IN ACCORDANCE WITH KING COUNTY STANDARDS AND MANUFACTURER'S 11. RELOCATE SURFACE WATER CONTROLS AND EROSION CONTROL MEASURES OR INSTALL NEW MEASURES SO THAT AS SITE CONDITIONS CHANGE THE EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL IS ALWAYS IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE KING COUNTY EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL STANDARDS. 12, COVER ALL AREAS THAT WILL BE UNWORKED FOR MORE THAN SEVEN DAYS DURING THE DRY SEASON OR TWO DAYS DURING THE WET SEASON WITH STRAW. WOOD FIBER MULCH, COMPOST, PLASTIC SHEETING OR EQUIVALENT. 13. STABILIZE ALL AREAS THAT REACH FINAL GRADE WITHIN SEVEN DAYS. 14. SEED OR SOD ANY AREAS TO REMAIN UNWORKED FOR MORE THAN 30 DAYS. 15. UPON COMPLETION OF THE PROJECT, ALL DISTURBED AREAS MUST BE STABILIZED AND BEST MANAGEMENT PRACTICES REMOVED IF APPROPRIATE. PROJECT LhFORMATION. NGY SHORT PLAT SITE IMPROVEMENT PLAN 17M 105TH AVE BE R'ENTON. WAOM ViNG COUNTY ISSUED FOR., IISSUED FOR DDES REVIEW REV:=DATE=DESCRIPTION.MSLKD �BY.=CAC B 1/10/101 �FOR _ Um A 04rI127w MMEDOR - mm DDES REVEEW PLANS PREPARED BY: �O COFINEr75-mNE 1401 NE WN ST, SURE 200 AVI E@5A97.1732 NOODNWLE WAIBOR FAX, 425.407.17A BAIL moww>di 4wy DRAWNBY:=CI,K: APV_ DRA [EQUIPIMENT: 5UC MWO IF LICENSURE: PK W. 0[ � y c z Is��p v4 88bNAL E E709RFS OZ'1506 DRAVVING TRLE: NOTES DRAWING INFORMATION; DONOTSCALEDRAWINGS. CONTRACTOR MUST VERIFY ALL DIMENSIONS AND ADVISE CONSULTANTS OF ANY ERRDRS AND OMISSIONS. ALL PREVIOUS ISSUES OF THIS DRAWING ARE SUPERSEDED BY THE LATEST REVISION. THE INFORMATION CONTA.P® IN THIS SET OF DOCUMENTS IS PROPRIETARY BY NATURE ANY USE OR DISLLOSURL OTHER T}IAN WHICH IS RELATED To NAMED CLIENT M STRICTLY PP)MMITED, DRAWNG NUMBER: f� REVISION: C - ]l D NOTE: PERMANENT SOIL STABILIZATION: ALL DISTURBED SOILS SHALL BE SEEDED AND MULCHED AT CONSTRUCTION FINIS. EROSION CONTROL MEASURES SHALL REMAIN IN PLACE UNTIL VEGETATION HAS ESTABLISHED IF NECESSARY. R= 2S MIN. 12- MIN. DEPTH (6' MIN. FOR RESIDENTIAL SINGLE FAMILY LOTS) 4- TO 6- QUARRY SPALLS (4- TO 6' FOR RESIDENTIAL SINGLE FAMILY LOTS) PROVIDE FULL WIDTH OF INGRESS/EGRESS AREA ou �M1 7 rib, O4'i wAr 2 CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE ROCK PAD 2204 NTS Nxl7SCALE: NTS FILTER FABRIC MATERIAL IN CONTINUOUS ROLLS USE STAPLES OR WIRE RINGS TO ATTACH FABRIC TO WIRE BURY BOTTOM OF FILTER MATERIAL WIRE MESH SUPPORT FENCEA IN 8'X1Z' TRENCH FOR FILTER FABRIC GROUND N SURFACE IRA u 6'-0' MAX. iv 2x4 WOOD POSTS, STD. OR BETTER OR EQUIVALENT FRONT VIEW WIRE MESH SUPPORT FENCE OR WOOD POSTS, STD, FOR FILTER FABRIC 1 �REI`TER OR EQUIVALENT FILTER FABRIC MATERIAL H PROVIDE 3/4' - 3' WASHED o GRAVEL BACKFILL IN H z TRENCH AND ON BOTH SIDES OF FILTER FENCE FABRIC ON THE SURFACE 8" BURY BOTTOM OF FILTER 'Lj MATERIAL IN 8'X12' TRENCH SIDE VIEW SILT FENCE DETAIL 22r94 SCALE: NTS ilxl7 SCALE: NTS PROJECT INFORMATION: NGY SHORT PLAT SITE IMPROVEMENT 1 NM RST�L�iIAVE SE RENTON, WA BMW KING COUNTY ISSUED FOR CISSUED FOR DDES REVIEW REV. =DAT2DESCRPTION: �BY:CCK: B I0101116 OFN — Nino q arazra FOR �Fw _ INTO PLANS PREPARED BY: COr�NEr�STQNE EO V= NE 2ZM ST, MAM20D PME 45A17IM �lN W0l1E,T9 9ii FAIL 42MLITM B4 E ° DRAWN BY: =CHK.: APV.: FDRA Sl1C EQUIPMENT: UCENSuFE: W. Oi 8 oy e FBBp LgTLA E%RRES WSW DRAWING MILE: DETAILS DRAWING INFORMATION: DO NOT SCALE DRAWINGS. CONTRACTOR MUST VERIFY ALL DIMENSIONS AND ADVISE CONSULTANTS OF ANY ERRORS AND OMISSIONS. ALL PREVIOUS ISSUES OF THIS DRAWING ARE SUPERSEDED BY THE LATEST REVISION. THE NidANT1ON CONTAINED N THIS SET OF DOCL94EM IS PROPRIETARY BY NATURE. ANY USE OR DISCLOSURE OTHER THAN WHICH IS RELATED TO NAMED CLIENT IS STRICTLY PROHeBRFD. DRAri7NG NUMBER REVISION: �4� 11 �Lu 0 0 w 5 4 x —41 p i I LOT 1 i 4 P, $ I TOTAL i8l O 50 FT (0.17 AC) \ EST. IMPER IOLIS 3200 SQ FT SEf.. / �°K I 1 w r + I, o UU SETBACK 1 r✓ Ix ! I� ) s-0^ �1/_lll _11—/1/l1�/L� I ILI � � X-V 6L=TSACK + I �I I I �1 T ^I PERFERATED71GHTLRE 4 CONNECTION L 1 I (Q SANITARY SEVER I� I If � � � � f Cj .1/ I I $ I T li 86',6'4Ii W .� — , •, — — � r�i� DIY IV1/ 5 I I�� x I (E) CLEM OUT 1 Ix i I LOT II I TOTAL 6826 SO Fr (0.\5 AC) I I I -- — L I I I EST, IMPERVIOUS 2600 So F F f I I I ' ; I iI. L 3 TOTAL 3410 SD FT (0. C) EST, IMPERVIOUS 1400 FT 9' CATCH R"N DUPLE7ED PUMPING STATION x f IS. i �� I---- - - - - - - - - - -- �I II SETBACK �( _ _ I / 1 -------�--- — — --F— rF.KL — f --- _ ----- --- ` NB8 °16'40�Af 128.41' I — E-E: 19A9. SEE•••••� SHEET C-2 i \ I I PROPOSED CONCPEfE SIDEWALK TRANSITION, SEE SHEET C3 ll 5 PRO 410 CONCRETE sTLEWRLK f cURBA1 AND CUTTER. SHEET G2 — I! II W-WR(W II f I1 I II E Ova � zq7 II — I pp - �, 1 � ) I ASPFlALT II II f i II If II s I I I NEW ASPHALT IN -Fill, I I SEE SHEET II I I NEW TURNDOWN, SE SHEET SIP a� IN w Lu I LI I IT IQw T F II ��IM1 $ rosr`�'�E7p, I'Z EX. HOUSE CONIC TRANS" If/ TO ABPHISLT SHOJ OF PPDPERTY— OFPROPERTY—' P'-( CREEK) I ! DRAINAGE SITE PLAN WSC$107SCu� I-S- F1afT5GILE: 1"-20'-0' Or to 20' I i f li \ F (E7 WATER SUPPLY II j f I I E Ii WATER SUPPLY II � I) it I I l , II II II fl II II II 11 II PROPOSED SANITARY SAYER MANRO E I( OWNER 1 DEVELOPER TEND AND MORENY NOY 550 16M AVE SE BELLEVUE, ViA 98006 206.351.1%4 LAND SURVEYOR TOUMA ENGINEERS AND LAND SURVEYORS 6832 S 19151 PLACE SURE E-102 KENT, WA 98032 425.251.08850FFICE ENGINEER CORNERSTONE ENGINEERING INC. 1000 DENNY WAY SUITE 800 SEATTLE, VVA W109 206.250.73% OFFICE 208.494.9480 FAX ZONING INFORMATION TOTALACERAGE 0.41 ACRES TOTAL LOTS 3 LOTS ZONE R850 ROAD AREA OSF. SMALLEST LOT 3410 S.F. (0.07 AC) PROPOSED USE SINGLE FAMILY SOIL TYPE ALDERWOOD ApC DRAINAGE VIELL DRAINED VEGITATMN GRASS PARCEL NUMBER 0037000133 SECTION, TOWNSHIP, AND RANGE PORTION OF NE 114 of SW 114 of 6- 29 T. 23 IN R_ 5 E. W.M. WATER & SEVVER UTILITY BOOS CREEK WATER 9 SEWER DISTRICT 14616 SE 192ND ST, RENTON WA WOO 1250)830-9900 BASIS OF BEARING NW 03 IS E, SE 1T2W STREI: I PLAT OF AKER'S FARM NO.5 -Zk- BENCHMARK SSMH AT $E CORNER OF PROPERTY ROM ELFV = 200 39 {800SCREEK) r (E) CB- TYPE 1 I I RIM. a -M 50 I I R. E=199,9Z(121 I i S. E.=190M (121 113 E E-=19979' (4') I DOT. EL=197.87 �{ L I (EI SANTARY SEWER (E)RE.0RW— �D H!I I (E) M TYPE 1 f l RIM EL=2W.50 I � S. 1E.=197,92(17j l E. E. 197.97 (4) I W. E: 197.50 (EW 12') 4'OORRUGATED II HOPE II II I, ,k �II I I �,I I III iIl II til �I I (E) OPEN DITCH {I I.1 �I 1r I �! �0�31 PROJECT INFORMATION. NGY SHORT PLAT SITE IMPROVEMENT PLAN 170031 OSTH AVE. SE RENTON. WA 08055 KING COUNTY ISSUED FOR ISSUED FOR DOES REVIEW I REV:=DATE: =DESCRIPTION: :=CK: Qalatla �� — MVq Y PLAN $ PREPARED BY: l7G a Or�W 5 T ONE 10p00ENT1' WAY SORE f�SEATII� WA 98SW PHOLE.7A615p.T906 Fa M&m SW EWIL' mg=rm*wwv' n BY:=CKC: AP'Y.: -DRANM — SUC MVYC EQUIPMENT: LICENSURE: W. 0( __✓ v � 1 3zzL 2� 1 IS J,p ss:s Li.1 � f EXPIRES 02r15Ai8 DRANANG TITLE: CONCEPTUAL DRAINAGE SITE PLAN DRAIMNG INFORMATION[ DO NOT SCALE ORAYRNGS. CONTRACTOR MUST VERIFY ALL DIMENSIONS AND ADVISE CONSULTANTS OF ANY ERRORS AND OMISSIONS- ALL PREVIOUS *WE$ OF THIS DRAW NG ARE SUPERSEDED BY THE LATEST REVISION. THE INFORMATION CONTAINED IN THIS BET OF DOCUMENTS IS PROPRIETARY BY NATURE ANY USE OR DISCLOSURE OTHER THAN WHICH IS RELATED TO NAMED CLEW IS STRICTLY PROHIBITED. DRAVI1NGNUMBER RfMISXft C-1 A PAVEMENT WIDTH SIN. SEWER ON SOUTH 8 WEST SIDE OF STREET. SEE SEC, 8.02C SIDEWALK 6" ` V-47 . NOTE 3 1 4' CEMENT CONCRETE - if I V \ \ \ I SUBGRADE SLOPE 0.02 CEMENT COW -METE CURB 8 19'I _ MAY AYBE REQUIRED DEPENDINTIONAL TREATMENT G NC GUTTER SEE DWG. 140.34M L/ ON SCIL CONDITIONS. GAS LINES ON SOUTH 8 WEST SIDE SEE SEC. 4.02 8 4.03 OF STREET. SEE SEC. 6.07A CRUSHED SURFACING BASE COURSE NOTE 1 CRUSHED SURFACING TOP COURSE NOTE 1 CUSS B ASPHALT CONCRETE NOTE 1 1. THIS DRAWING ILLUSTRATES A TYPICAL ASPHALT CONCRETE ROAD SECTION. ALTERNATIVE II. ACTUAL SURFACING DESIGN FOR ARTERIALS AND COMMERCIAL ACCESS STREETS SHALL BE BASED ON SCILS AND TRAFFIC ANALYSIS PER SEC. 4,03. DESIGN FOR RESIDENTIAL ACCESS SHALL BE IN ACCORDANCE WRTH SECS. 4.01 AND 4.02 2. GRADES: MINIMUM 0.5% MAXIMUM SEE SECS.2.0Z 2.03. ZC4. MIDZ11. 3. SIDEWALKS SHALL BE 6 FT. WADE IN BUSINESS DISTRICTS AND 6.S FT. WIDE ON ARTERIALS IF NEXT TO TRAFFIC LANE, 5 FT. WIDE IF NEXT TO PA.RI3NG OR BIKE LANE. OR BEHIND PLANTING STRIP SEE SECTION &026. 4. FOR WIDTHS OF PAVEMENT, SHOULDER AND RI(3HR-0E-WAY, SEE SECS. 202, 2.03, AND 2.04. S. FOR CLEARANCE OF UTILITY POLES SEE SEC. 8.02G AND DWG. NO- 5-M. 6. SEE CHAPTER 7 FOR CATCH BASIN AND STORM SEWER LOCATIONS. 7, SEE SEC. 5.02 FOR SIDE SLOPE REQUIREMENTS. ROADISIDEWALK SECTION ¢ PLANTING STRIP DUMMY JOINT - �Om 1T 114""Nr GROOVE DUMMY JOINT @ MAX. 15' C-C EXPANSION JOINT ALONG CURB 114"V' GROOVE @ MAX. 5 C-C B VERTICAL CURB & SIDEWALK EXPANSION JOINT aI T I SECTION B-B CURB & SIDEWALK JOINTS 647 TO 6A' o Q n V FRAME AND GRATE NOTE 3 d SEE SEC, 7.05 AND d APPLICABLE DINGS. UTILITY PCLES PLACED BACK OF SIDEWALK - NOTE 5 T2` MIN 1 : C 0.02 FT z1,,, i i 6' RISER SECTION Islam, \\ WATER LINES ON NORTH 8 EAST SIDE OF ROAD. SEE SEC.8.02A a f CATCH BASIN 8 STORM SEWERS TTYP.) i NOTE 6 ,z 17 RISER SECTION 3gfW1,g06 B EXPANSION JOINT DUMMY JOINT 3-001 ua�,t .a:unw PRECAST BASE SECTION * EASUREIAENT AT THE TOP OF THE BASE) PLAN NOTES: I. CURD INLET TO BE CONSTRUCTED IN ACCORDANCE WITH ASTM GI78 8 CM UNLESS OTHERWISE SHOWN ON PLANS OR NOTED IN THE WSDOT/APWA STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS. 2, AS AN ACCEPTABLE ALTERNATIVE TO REBAR. WELDED WIRE FABRIC HAVING A MIN. AREA OF 0.12 SQUARE INCHES PER FCOT MAY BE USED. WELDED WIRE FABRIC SHALL COMPLY TO AWM A447 (AASHTO M 221). IAiRE FABRIC SHALL NOT BE PLACED IN KNOCKOUTS. 3. ALL REINFORCED CAST4N-PLACE CONCRETE SHALL BE CUSS 4000. 4. PRECAST BASES SWILL BE FURNISHED WITH CUTOUTS OR KNOCKOUTS. KNOCKOUTS SHALL HAVEA WALL THICKNESS OFT MIN, ALL PIPE SHALL BE INSTALLED IN FACTORY PROVIDED KNOCKOUTS. UNUSED KNOCKOUTS NEED NOT BE GROUTED IF WALL IS LEFT INTACT. 5. KNOCKOUT OR CUTOUT HOLE SIZE 1.5 EQUAL TO PIPE OUTER DLAM. PLUS CATCH BASIN WALL THICKNESS. 6. ROUND KNOCKOUTS MAY BE ON ALL 4 SIDES WITH MAX. DIAM. OF 17-. 7. THE MAX- DEPTH FROM THE FINISHED GRADE TO THE PIPE 04VEK JS 54T 8. THE TAPER ON THE SIDES OF THE PRECAST BASE SECTION AND RISER SECTION SHALL NOT EXCEED 1!71FT. 4. CONCRETE INLET FRAME AND GRATES SHALL BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS AND FEET TFE STRENGTH REQUIREMENTS OF FEDERAL SPECIFICATION RR-F-=D. MATING SURFACES SHALL BE FINISHED TO ASSURE NON -ROCKING FIT WITH ANY COVER POSITION. 10. FRAME AND GRATE MAY BE INSTALLED WITH FLANGE DOVM OR CAST INTO RISER CURB INLET GUTTER GU CATCH BASIN -/ S" SECTION A -A NOTES: 1. SET TO GRADE AND CONSTRUCT ROAD AND GUTTER TO BE FLUSH WITH FRAME. 2. SEE SEC. 3.04 FOR JOINT REQUIREMENTS. SECTION B-B THROUGH -CURB INLET FRAME & GRATE WITH VERTICAL CURB INSTALLATION 2-012 )IN 1 S IACIN 2-017 PROJECT INFORMATION: NGY SHORT PLAT SITE IMPROVEMENT PLAN 17001 105THAVE SE RENTON. WA SO= TONG COUNTY ISSUED FOR: ISSUED FOR DDES REVIEW REV:= DATE= DESCRIPTION: K Q0/)0210R - LIIWO ODF= PLANS PREPARED BY: Ea eOc,NeewSa�IVE 1®0@NYIYAYaW illM SEATIIE 1WA III07 PFIOIE 2Mffi7S6 FAX 31IAN-40 $ALL Rl= DRAWN BY:=CHIC: APV_ DRA C SUC MWO EQUIPMENT: IF LICENSUiE: PX W. � pF py t O 2 � P e'�s`ror�T� pia /jfD c '7► EXPIRES 02115V6 DRAWNG TITLE: DRAINAGE DETAILS DRAWING INFORMATION: DO NOT SCALE DRAWINGS. CONTRACTOR MUST VERIFY ALL DIMENSIONS AND ADVISE CONSULTANTS OF ANY ERRORS AND OMISSIONS. ALL PREVIOUS ISSUES OF THIS DRAWING ARE SUPERSEDED BY THE UYEST REVISION. THE INFORMATION CONTAINED IN THIS Sty OF DOCUMENTS IS PROPRIETARY BY NATURE. ANY USE OR DISCLOSURE OTHER THAN WHICH IS RELATED TO NAMED CLIENT IS STRICTLY PROHIBITED. DRAW NO NUMBER RENSION: C-2 A "CEMENT CONCRETE iDEWALK AND RAMP MIN MATCH EXISTING OR 12 PROPOSED SURFACE 1 ASPHALT u= um NOTES: 1. FOR WIDTHS OF SIDEWALK SEE SEC. 3.02. 2. FOR WIDTHS OF PAVEMENT AND SHOULDER SEE SECS.2.02. 2.03. AND 2.0C 3. SHOULDER SHALL BE SURFACED AS REQUIRED BY SECTIONS 3.07 AND 4.01. IF PAVED. SHOULDER SLOPE SHALL MATCH CROWN SLOPE OR.02 FTJT. 4. FOR CURB AND SIDEWALK JOINTS SEE DWG. NO. 3-001. 5. TRANSITION RAMP SHALL BE TEXTURED BY IMPRINT OF METAL GRID WITH 11T SPACING. CEMENT CONCRETE SIDEWALK TRANSITION TO ASPHALT SHOULDER J� g RIGHT OF WAY LINE • CURB TAPER RESIDENTIAL 10'-0" MIN. 20-V MAX. lz`m COMM.ANDUSTR. 25'4" MIN, 36-0" MAX 4 r� 6 VARIES 51-0 VARIES RIGHT OF WAY LINE MATCH EXISTING DRIVEWAY GRADE CEMENT CONCRETE DRIVEWAY 5' THICK SECTION A A P CURB TAPER 4-004 SIDEWALK PLANTING STRIP, IF ANY NOTES: 1. COMMERCIALANDUSTRIAL DRIVEWAYS WIDER THAN 35MAY BE APPROVED BY THE ENGINEER CONSIDERING TRAFFIC SAFETY AND NEEDS OF THE ACTIVITY SERVED. ALL COMMERCIALANDUSTRIAL DRIVEWAYS SHALL HAVE AN EXPANSION JOINT LOCATED MID -WIDTH. SEE SEC. 3.04. 2. SEE SECTION 3.01. 3. SEE SEC. 4.01 FOR SURFACING REQUIREMENTS. CURB & GUTTER SECTION DRIVEWAY 3-004 PROJECT INFORMATION: NGY SHORT PLAT SITE IMPROVEMENT PLAN 170M 1057H AVE SE RENTON. WA SWO KING COUNTY ISSUED FOR: 1REV:=oATE-=DESCRFlnON:= ISSUED FOR DDES REVIBY:=CK IF Qb17021a D- VM PLANS PF"ARED BY: �F[7RN ERSVC7NE �O Oi�lllM iu P. � 10M WW*AY &M tlf00 SEAM WA W09 NBNE100750A700 FAX=,494NW F3NL p�rarnrtlpneip�om DRAWN FIY:�CHK» AFry.. DRA SUC MWO EGUIPIAEM: LICENSUFE W. K W. O of NusH oy e j 3226�ap � ISTEt"d4", 8 sg�pw4kL EqG v EXPIRES 0Zi5N6 DRAVANGTITLE: DRPJNAGE DETAILS DRAMANGINFORMATION: DO NOT SCALE DRAWNGS. CONTRACTOR RUST VERIFY ALL DIMENS40NS AND ADVISE CONSULTANTS OF ANY ERRORS AND OMISSIONS. ALL PREVIOUS ISSUES OF THIS DRAWNC ARE SUPERSEDED BY THE LATEST REVISIOFL THE INFORMATION CCNTARED N TH15 SET OF OOCUMENT3IS PROPRIETARY BY NATURE ANY USE OR DISCLOSURE OTHER THAN WHICH IS RELATED 7O NAMED CLENT IS STRICTLY PROH[BrTED. DRAVANG NUMBER RENSIcwo C-3 A � I t x —---�1-_ X ,ees• w ,zea,• x \ F� I — — ---- _ � if LOT 1 �f I 44}} I � I TOTAL 7810 SO FT (0.17 AC) ` EST. IMPERVIOUS 3200 SO FT % 1 w / w L---- -- --- �� � --� jI P1 — -� I PROPOSED SIT � I 1,- - IF 1 J 4:1 ALL EXPOSED SIRS SHALL BE MULCHED lArliH STRAW AND J vi O ( CHIPPED SITE VEGETATION WHEN I I I — — ALLDPoVE4YAY57O IE g I I NOT BEAD WORKED \ I - — GONSTRjJCTEp ANo GRAVEIID 111 PRIOR TD SITE CLEMIN6 - - A ACTI1rti3 I1J � N�I I ��•16'�W •l i 1 17R1VE r Ix j r I E - 1 LOT -- �,II r I TOTAL 5828 Sq F�(D AC} I I {- — ESTIMPERVIOUS — — • —, I IMPERVIOUS 2800 SC! FT - - - - - - - i of rs 3 I J I a--------------6 I 1 II jj I g e I TOTAL 34IO SO FT (OA C} I (p\ 8 EST. IMPERvIOUS 1400 FT I I I I h lI I I CATCH BASIN I I I II DUPIEIED PUMPING STATION I J I I ` C�-- - — — --- -I ---- - - - --- --- I-- I2L— � NBS',6.128.41' / CURB WIET TOG. f09.0: /E. E: 1919 fl.5', SEE f/ � SLEET C-2 — - / IEI0.EUI / EX. HOUSE 1 SA6/ I coNG TRANSITION 7O AS TY / i SEE C3 TYP.EA :N J / OF PROPERTY m Rq1! '900f 4TEDlY lb R m I{ EROSION SEDIMENT CONTROL PLAN 22s34SfJLE: 1 1J-0 I 11Xi75fhIP 1'=21f� a 1a 2a I \ PROPOSED CONCRETE SIDEWALK �^ TRNtslrnN. S(E SIfET G3 II S \ ' PROPOSED CONCRETE SIDEWAU( CURB AND GUTTER SEE SLEET G2 R" II I! I II II 1 II I III -rr �kl ! ASPHALT II II I 1I f I' I NEW ASRIALT INfLL I SEE SLEET c3 I I II ANEW TURFOOWN' SEE SLEET C3Y � tl I I I (E) WATER SUPPLY II I' 11 I ! _= WATER SUPPLY 3 `aF me II �� II nn II N I II PROPOSED SANITARY EVER 1 UAWOLE w II 1 it II II �I �ulf el I OMER I DEVELOPER TENG AND MDRENY NGY 55M 15M AVE SE BELLEVUE, WA M W 206.351A994 LAND SURVEYOR TOUMA ENGINEERS AND LAND SURVEYORS WU $ 191st PLACE SUITE E-102 KENT, WA 9WU 425251.0665 OFFICE ENGINEER CORNERSTONE ENGINEERING INC. 1000 DENNY WAY SUITE WO SEATTI.E. WA 98109 2052W T3W OFFICE 206AS4.94M FAX ZONING INFORMATION TOTAL ACJiAGE 0.41 ACHES TOTALLOTS 3LOTS ZONE ROW ROADAREA 05.F. SMALLEST LOT 3410 S.F. (0.07AC) PROPOSED USE SNGLE FAMILY SOILTYPE ALDERWOOD ApC DRAINAGE WELL DRAINED VEGITATION GRASS PARCEL NUMBER OD070DO133 SECTION, TOWNSHIP, AND RANGE PORTION OF NE 1/4 at Sw V4 at S. 29 T. 2311 R 5 E_ W.M. WATER & SEWER UTILITY SOOS CREEL( WATER S SEWER DISTRICT 14616 SE 1922NO ST, PENTON WA 98MB a") 63D' 9 BASIS OF BEARING NW OT 12'LL $E 172W STREET PLAT OF AXER°S FARM NO. 5 `- BENCHMARK SSW AT SE CORNER OF PROPERTY RIM ELEV.=200.39 (SODS CREEK) I I I LOOTS OF CLEARING FOR ODNSTRDDTM I ! OF SDEWAL(. CURB, GUTIETLAW WOW I I DRAIN IN ASSOGATION WITH SEPARATE STREET RIW-CF-WAY USE PERMIT LEGEND I II I I i DENOTESAPPROxIMATECLEARING LOMI'T BOUNDARY li � (E)CB-TYFEt RW, EL-X)tW —o- -DENOTES APPRO)"TE LIMITS OF SILT N.E?199.92(12) FENCE E. E.=t992F (I) Qp-(�y'Qy' x-�,y LIMITS OF ROCK CONSTRUCTION I I BIT. EL=IWM BM ENTRANCE {E}4'COPRUGAIED }SANRARl gWEF LIMITCONSCONSTRLUCTOF TIRAVI(ONAAGDRTVEWAYS PRIOR TO 1I TIVITY HDFE I! V I 4Ei C& TYRE 1 ry11 RIM,EL-�Os 0.57 N. E.=1W.95 (171 ° 4 I E. E=197.W (4) MCR��W. E: 197.500EW 171 CSE} V CORRUGATED IFEPE � II II \ tl II II ) I � III API �I I �I I OPEN DITCH II II u �Yt f -c I I Iz► PROJECT WF ORMAT1ON: NGY SHORT PLAT SITE IMPROVEMENT PLAN 17003 10 -M AVE SE RENTON, WAMM IONG COUNTY ISSUED FUR: ISSUED FOR DDES REVIEW L REV.=DATE:=DESCRIPTION: = BY:=CK; Qq ata2Ya ISWOFOR - IArG DMRB" PLANS PREPARED BY: Eo :Oo�wcewSla ONE IO1700@IIYWAYSUTEMSFATTL WA9hW PHOIE MMM FAX: M404.91W awM .wvmm ^DRAVYN BY:=CW_' AW- kEIL pRq SUG MIND EQUIPMENT. LICENSURE- x Ty .f D oP ZlF�74TEt�` M1r� pr'I'L EpG .. E1wIFZEs ay15v0 DRAWING TTRE: SEDIMENT CONTROL PLAN E DRAWING INFORMATIONt DO NOT SCALE DRAWINGS. CONTRACTOR MUST VERIFY ALL DIMENSIONS AND ADVISE CONSULTANTS OF ANY ERRORS AND OMISSIONS. ALL PREVIOUS ISSUES OF THIS DRAWN• ARE SUPERSEDED BY THE LATEST REVISION THE INFORMATION CONTAINED IN THIS SEI OF DOCUMENTS IS PROPRIETARY BY NATURE ANY USE OR DISCLOWURF OTHER THAN WHICH IS RELATED TO NAMED CLENT IS STRICTLY PROHIBITED. DRAWING NUMBER REVISION: C-4 r% DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT AND ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES LAND USE SERVICES DIVISION REPORT TO THE HEARING EXAMINER PUBLIC HEARING NOTICE — September 15, 2004 at 1:00 P.M. DDES Hearing Room 900 Oakesdale Avenue SW Renton, WA (Hearings are sometimes postponed or canceled. Call 296-6640 to confirm hearing date, time, and place. Parties and interested persons who have requested notification about this proposal will be notified of the time and date of the rescheduled hearing. Any questions about postponements and rescheduling can be directed to the Hearing Examiner's Office at (206) 296-4660. Appeal of a Short Plat Preliminary decision FILE No. L03SO031 A. GENERAL INFORMATION: Project: Short subdivision of approximately .41 acre parcel into three residential lots in R-8 zone. Applicant: Teng Ngy 5563 156�' Avenue SE Bellevue, WA 980006 (206) 351-1994 Appellants: Tim McCannon and Bonnie Bottesch 17007 1051h Place Southeast Renton, WA 98055 (425) 277-9569 Location: 17003 105"' Avenue Southeast STR: SW '/4 29-23-05 Zoning: Residential 8 dwelling unit per an acre R-8 B. History and Background: On November 14, 2003 the applicant Mr. Ngy applied for a short subdivision permit to subdivide a .42 acre into three residential lots in a residential zone with density of eight dwelling unit per acre. APPEAL OF SHORT PLAT DECISION FILE: L04AP0010 NGY Short Plat, KC File No. L03SO031 Mr. Ngy had already applied for a building permit to remodel and expand the existing house on the site on February 7, 2003. The building permit was issued on April 4, 2003. On June 18, 2004 DDES issued a preliminary approval subject to conditions for the proposed three -lot short subdivision. This decision was timely appealed by the neighbors on July 6, 2004. An statement of appeal was submitted by the appellants on July 12, 2004. C. SEPA APPEAL: On July 6, 2004 a timely appeal was filed with the Department of Development and Environmental Services (DDES) by number of neighbors (Exhibit ) represented by Mr. McCannon and Bonnie Bottesch. The appeal raised number of issues (Exhibit ). A pre -hearing conference was held by the King County Hearing Examiner's Office on August 19, 2004. A Pre -Hearing Order issued by the Hearing Examiner on August 20, 2004 identified the issues relevant to the short Plat proposal: 1. Would failure of the Applicant's proposed drainage pump system harm surrounding residential properties? Should a backup system be required to mitigate for potential pump failure? 2. Does proposed lot 3 within the short plat at an area of 3410 square feet violate zoning density or lot area requirements? Can three lots be platted on the property consistent with applicable density and lot area standards? 3. Will the plat requirement to plant street trees create a risk to drainage or sewage facilities from tree root growth? 4. Will the short plat, as designed, adequately provide for required off-street parking? D. SCOPE AND STANDARD OF REVIEW The proposed short subdivision is governed by 1994 King County Comprehensive Plan which designates this area as Urban. The proposal is reviewed under the provision of King County Short Subdivision Code, Title 19A. 08. King County Zoning Code, Title 21 A, Surface Water Design Manual under the King County -Title 9, and Road Standards under the King County Title 14. Standards and requirements applied by these codes assure proper subdivision of land in accordance with the state and county laws and protects public health safety and welfare. E. APPEAL ISSUES DISCUSSION P4 APPEAL OF SHORT PLAT DECISION FILE: L04APOOIO NGY Short Plat, KC File No. L03S0031 1. Would failure of the Applicant's proposed drainage pump system harm surrounding residential properties? Should a backup system be required to mitigate for potential pump failure? 2. Does proposed lot 3 within the short plat at an area of 3410 square feet violate zoning density or lot area requirements? Can three lots be platted on the property consistent with applicable density and lot area standards? Per KCC 21A.12.070 allowable number of lots are computed -by multiplying the site area specified in KCC 2 ] A.12.080 by the applicable residential base density number. KCC 2IA. 12.080 —Calculations-Site area for base density and maximum density floor calculations allows that all site areas to be used in calculation of base allowed residential density with the exception of areas within the site characterized as submerged lands. Per KCC 21A.12.080 B. submerged lands cannot be credited toward base density. The site does not include any submerged land. KCC 21 A.06.1273 defines submerged land as any land at or below the Ordinary High Water Mark (OHWM). The subject site is zoned R-8 and is approximately .41 acre. Multiplying the site area, .41 acre by the zone density 8, the allowed density of site is 3.36 or a total of three lots. The driveway tract does not get subtracted from the lot area. The proposed three lot subdivision meets the density and lot dimension requirements of R-8 zone. 3. Will the plat requirement to plant street trees create a risk to drainage or sewage facilities from tree root growth? KCC 21A.16.050 E requires street trees along the streets fronting all residential subdivisions. The street trees must be installed in accordance with the King County Road Standards Drawing No. 5-009. The street trees must be selected from the approved street tree list by the King County Council. The trees are carefully selected with least and no damage to public infrastructure and utilities. APPEAL OF SHORT PLAT DECISION FILE: L04AP0010 NGY Short Plat, KC File No. L03SO031 4. Will the short plat, as designed, adequately provide for required off-street parking? KCC 21A.18.030 requires two off-street parking spaces be provided on site per each single family residence. Each lot must provide a minimum two off-street parking spaces on site. This will be reviewed during the building permit process for each lot. Per the required density lot area dimension, each lot will be large enough to accommodate two off-street parking spaces. The frontage street is a minor access road and it is expected that occasional guest parking may occur along the street. Two additional lots will not create parking congestion in the area. F. CONCLUSIONS: This proposal is not in conflict with the policies of the Comprehensive Plan. Further the subject short subdivision will comply with the goals and objectives of the King County Comprehensive Plan and will comply with the requirements of the Subdivision and Zoning Codes and other official land use controls of King County, based on the conditions of the short plat preliminary approval. G. RECOMMENDATION: Deny the appeal. 4 41 August 26, 2004 OFFICE OF THE HEARING EXAMINER KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON 400 Yesler Way, Room 404 Seattle, Washington 98104 Telephone (206) 296-4660 Facsimile (206) 296-1654 NOTICE OF RESCHEDULED HEARING SUBJECT: Department of Development and Environmental Services File No. L03SO031 NGY SHORT PLAT Short Plat Appeal Location: 17003 — 105th Avenue Southeast Appellants: Tim McCannon & Bonnie Bottesch 17007 — 105th Place Southeast Renton, Washington 98055 Telephone: (425) 277-9569 Applicant: Teng' Ngy 5563 — 156th Avenue Southeast Bellevue, Washington 98006 (206) 351-1994 King County: Department of Development and Environmental Services represented by Fereshteh Dchkordi and Curt Foster 900 Oakesdale Avenue Southwest Renton, Washington 98055 Telephone: (206) 296-7173 and 296-7106 Facsimile: (206) 296-7051 At the request of DDES staff and agreement by all parties, the public hearing on the above -referenced appeal originally scheduled for 1:00 p.m. on September 10, 2004, has been rescheduled for the following time and place: 1:00 P.M. Wednesday — September 15, 2004 Department of Development and Environmental Services Hearing Room 900 Oakesdale Avenue SW Renton, Washington L03SO031 — Ngy Short Plat Page 2 of 3 ORDERED this 26th day of August, 2004. Stafford L. Smith King County Hearing Examiner TRANSMITTED this 26th day of August, 2004, to the following parties and interested persons: Christopher & Michele Binkley Hank & Eulaine Blumenthal Javier & Lymara Casio 17032 - 104th Ave. SE 16830 - 105th Ave. SE 17031 - 105th Ave. SE Renton WA 98055 Renton WA 98055 Renton WA 98055 Heath & Miyumi Conner Cornerstone Engineering Barry Crampton 17010 - 104th Ave. SE Mark Olson 16820 - 105th Ave. SE Renton WA 98055 1000 Denny Way, #800 Renton WA 98055 Seattle WA 98109 James Donaldson Jeff & Lynn Howard Anthony & Patricia Juarez 17003 - 105th Ave. SE 17014 - 104th Ave. Se 16663 - 105th Ave. SE Renton WA 980 Renton WA 98055 Renton WA 98055 Margaret King Rebecca Lind Bonnie Bottesch & Tim McCannon 16829 - 105th Ave. SE City of Renton, EDNSP 17007 - 105th Ave. SE Renton WA 98055 1055 S. Grady Way Renton WA 98055 Renton WA 98056 Robert & Marjorie Midgett Reggie Newman Teng Nyg 17012 - 105th Ave. SE 17013 - 105th Ave. SE 5563 - 156th Ave. SE Renton WA 98055 Renton WA 98055 Bellevue WA 98006 Eugene Riske Jay Seo Darren & Bonnie Sweaney 16821 - 105th Ave. SE Cornerstone Engineering 17004 - 105th Ave. SE Renton WA 98055 1000 Denny Way, #800 Renton WA 98055 Seattle WA 98109 Tom Touma David & Wendy Yadock Fereshteh Dehkordi Touma Engineers 17020 - 104th Ave. SE DDESILUSD 6632 S 191 st PI, #E-102 Renton WA 98055- Current Planning Kent WA 98032 MS OAK-DE-0100 Lisa Dinsmore Curt Foster Rich Hudson DDES/LUSD DDES/LUSD DDESILUSD MS OAK-DE-0100 Engineering Review Section Current Planning MS OAK-DE-0100 MS OAK-DE-0100 Foster, Curt From: Deraitus, Elizabeth Sent: Thursday, August 19, 2004 3:32 PM To: Moore, Bernard Cc. Hudson, Richard; Foster, Curt; Dehkordi, Fereshteh; Malone, Patricia Subject: RE: !7003 105th Avenue SE, Bo3M0225/1-03S0031 Bernard, If after inspection it is found that these issues are not related to the permit, please let Patricia Malone know and she will have a case opened. Thanks -----Original Message ----- From: Dehkordi, Fereshteh Sent: Thursday, August 19, 2004 3:31 PM To: Moore, Bernard Cc: Deraitus, Elizabeth; Hudson, Richard; Foster, Curt Subject: !7003 105th Avenue SE, Bo3M0225/1-03S0031 Bernard: There is currently a building permit application for construction of a building on this site (KC File B03M0225). The applicant is Teng Ngy. He has also submitted a short plat application (KC File No. L03SO031) to create two additional lots on his site. The short plat preliminary approval was issued on June 18, 2004 and was appealed by neighbors. The appeal statement describes multiple violations such as grading which has contributed to drainage problems on neighbor's properties and other violations such as untidy construction site, work without the permit, etc. additionally they complained about the lack of a "port a potty" on the site which has resulted in the workers using the yard. The neighbors also expressed frustration with lack of response by DDES Building Services Division. In the prehearing conference, the Examiner determined that the current problems as described by the neighbors should be dealt with through the current building permit or a code enforcement process and since they are not shortplat issues, they are not issues with the shortplat appeal. Please have your inspector visit the site to investigate any violations and open a code violation case if necessary. Please let me know if I need to pursue other process so the neighbors can get some of their questions answered. Thank you. Fereshteh 1000 Denny Way, Suite 800 Phone: (206) 250-7306 C0FtNEr,R5irONr= Seattle, WA 98109 (206) 380-4231 E N n 1 N E E R I N G, 1 N C. Email: cei@cornerstone-engr.com Fax: (206) 494-9460 CIVIL # STRUCTURAL # SURVEY Web: www.comerstone-engr.com (425) 984-0388 April 01, 2004 King County Dept. of Development and Environmental Services Land Use Service Division ATTN: 1=ereshteh Dehkordi, Current Planning Section 900 Oaksdale Avenue Southwest Renton, WA 98055-1219 RE: Response to "Notice of Request for Additional Information or Studies" Ngy Short Plat Application No. L03S0031 Dear Ms. Dehkordi, Mr. Teng Ngy has obtained Cornerstone Engineering, Inc. (CEI) to act as the owners representative and provide engineering solutions to aide in the successful completion of the aforementioned proposed short plat application.. Mr. Ngy has been out of the country for an extended period of time and asked that all future correspondence be copied to the offices of CEI as shown above for timely response. This letter is intended to address the items of concern as outlined in the "Notice of Request for Additional Information or Studies", from DDES dated February 10, 2004. Please note that Mr. Ngy had applied for and was granted an extension to the original deadline for submittal from the original date of March 10, 2004 to May 10, 2004. The response to the items of concern are as follows: Item A — Access & Traffic — KCRS C Although no action is required at this time, new concrete curb, gutter and sidewalk along the frontage property are proposed in conformance with 1993 KCRS, section 2.03 and as a storm water drainage control measure in an effort to divert the offsite flow onto the subject property from 105t' Avenue SE. See item B.1. 7 ti Item B -- Drainage — King County SWDM 1. A drainage diversion adjustment is desired in an effort to divert the surface water from entering the property from 105`h Avenue SE and into the existing County storm water drainage facilities on the west side of 105'h Avenue SE per the attached Drainage Site Plan. Preliminary discussions with LUSD staff member Curt Foster indicated that such a diversion adjustment may be available and desirable. 2. Please see the attached Conceptual Drainage Plan showing the proposed mitigation to the storm water ponding problem at the southwest corner of the property. a) Mr. Ngy was unsuccessful in obtaining drainage easements from downstream property owners which would allow for a drainage conveyance system for concentrated runoff to run across the adjacent properties to the open ditch discharge at 106' Avenue SE as the first option. b) We propose diversion of the upstream flow currently entering the property with the approval of the drainage diversion adjustment and the installation of the proposed sidewalk, curb and gutter. This is expected to eliminate the storm water ponding issue at the southwest property corner. Comprehensive Design Solutions for Your Project Success! 3. Please see the attached Drainage assessment letter and Erosion and Sediment Control Plan for compliance with the Small Site BMP requirements which has been prepared, stamped, and signed by a professional engineer licensed in the State of Washington. 4. Please see the attached Conceptual Drainage Plan which has been prepared, stamped, and signed by a professional engineer licensed in the State of Washington. Please contact me at any time if you have comments or questions about any of the drainage or ESC issues relating to this project. Sincerely, Mark W. Olson, P.E. Principal Cornerstone Engineering, Inc. 1000 Denny Way, Suite 800 Phone: (206) 250-7306 Seattle, WA 98109 (206) 380-4231 Email: cei@cornerstone-engr.com CO�NERSIrONE Fax: (206) 494-9460 4EO� Web: www.cornerstone-engr.com (425) 984-0388 1000 Denny Way, Suite 800 Phone: (206) 250-7306 C©RNEr-qs"irONE Seattle, WA 98109 (206) 3804231 "G E N G I N E E R i N G, I N U. Email: cei@cornerstone-engr.com Fax: (206) 494-9460 Web: www.comerstone-engr.com (425) 984-0388 CIVIL # .S7"RUCTURAL r SURVEY April 01, 2004 Drainage Assessment Ngy Short Plat KC Permit #L03SO031 The project is located at 17003 1051h Avenue SE in Renton on a 0.41 acre lot. The project proposes to divide the existing parcel into 3 lots. The site is gently sloped from 105th Avenue SE to the southwest property corner and adjacent existing residential lots. The parcel has an existing home in the northeast corner (proposed Lot 1) which is currently undergoing upgrades under a separate permit. Upstream contributions of flows are currently entering the property as sheet flow from the east via 105th Avenue SE. The existing land cover consists of natural grass and pasture -like ground cover. Site drainage consists of sheet flow dispersed through vegetation and exiting the parcel at the natural low point along the southeast property line onto the adjacent residential properties. Downstream flow continues through the adjacent residential grass covered parcels and into an open drainage ditch along 106th Avenue SE where it flows south toward the ditch system at Benson Road. Lot 1 (with the existing house) is proposed to be 7810 square feet with approximately 3200 square feet of total impervious area. Lot 2 is proposed to be 6826 square feet with approximately 2800 square feet of total impervious area and contains the common driveway for all three lots. Lot 3 is proposed to be 3410 square feet with approximately 1400 square feet of total impervious area. Both Lot 2 and Lot 3 are expected to contain a 2500 square foot house/garage. The total amount of impervious surface proposed will be approximately 7400 square feet, which is less than the 10,000 square foot limit for small site drainage review. Engineering Drainage and Erosion and Sediment Control Plans are being prepared by Cornerstone Engineering, Inc. for the short plat drainage and frontage improvements along 105th Avenue SE. There are no sensitive areas or permanent drainage systems on site. On -site soils are shown to be Alderwood AgC although no soils analysis has been provided for this parcel. Downspouts draining roofs are to employ a downspout dispersion trench and sheet flow over vegetated flow paths to the natural site discharge point in the southwest corner of Lot 2. The driveway at the existing home on Lot 1 shall have a 2% minimum cross slope away from the house and drain into a perforated tight line connection into the downspout drainage system. All other driveways shall be sloped to sheet flow drain into a minimum 10- foot vegetation buffer. All directed and natural flow storm water is to be collected in the south west corner of Lot 1 by an area drain catch basin which will gravity drain to a pumping station chamber. The flow will then be pumped via a 2" force main back up to the new catch basin curb inlet near the south end of the new sidewalk and then gravity drain to the existing catch basin county drainage facility on the east side of 105'h Avenue SE. The pump station will be a complete packaged domestic duplexed pumping station as manufactured by Norweco Equipment Company or approved equal. The following BMP's will be used as shown on the ESC plan: o Clearing limits will be marked by construction fencing or other means on the ground. o The driveways will be constructed and graveled immediately. Areas accepting sheet flow from the driveway will be seeded and mulched where existing native vegetation is disturbed. o Silt fencing will be placed along down slope sides of building sites and cleared areas. o A rock construction entrance will be placed at the end of the driveway. o Straw and chipped site vegetation mulch will be spread over all cleared areas of the site when they are not being worked. The final recording documents will include a statement that the approved small site drainage plan will be used for any future building permits or other site alterations. Comprehensive Design Solutions far Your Project Success! King Count%,j Department of Development and Environmental Services 900 Oakesdale Avenue SW Renton, WA 98055-1219 February 10, 2004 Teng Ngy 5563 156`h Avenue SE Bellevue, WA 98006 RE: Notice of Request for Additional Information or Studies Application No. L03SO031 Date Filed: November 14, 2003 Date of Complete Application: December 11, 2003 Dear Mr. Ngy: The purpose of this letter is to notify you pursuant to Ordinance 12196 that the Land Use Services Division is requesting additional information and/or studies to complete the review of your project. The information is described on the enclosed plat screening transmittal. When submitting the requested information, include a copy of the plat screening transmittal and retain a copy for your records. Provide a cover letter which lists how each item was addressed. Any clarification or explanation of the submittal can also be included in the cover letter. Please submit the information to: King County Dept. of Development and Environmental Services LAND USE SERVICES DIVISION ATTN-. Fereshteh Dehkordi, Current Planning Section 900 Oakesdale Avenue Southwest Renton, WA 98055-1219 If the submittal is hand delivered, submit it at the address above. Your application is on "hold" from the date of this notice, until the date you are advised that the additional information satisfies this request, or 14 days after the date the information has been provided. You will be notified if the Division determines that the information is insufficient. Please note that the supplemental information required after vesting of a complete application shall not affect the validity of such application. The deadline for the submittal of the necessary information is March 10, 2004. In the event you feel extenuating circumstances exist which may justify an extension of this date, you may submit such request, in writing, for consideration by this department. Failure to meet the deadline shall be cause for the Department to cancel or deny the application. If you have any questions regarding the additional information or the submittal deadline, please call me at (206) 296-7173. Sincerely, Fereshteh Dehkordi, Project/Program Manager Current Planning Section, Land Use Services Division cc: Tom Tuma, Tuma Engineers and Land Surveyors Curt Foster, Senior Engineer, Engineering Review Section Application File Short Plat Screening Transn.._.al King County LUSD File No. L03SO031 Department of Development Date of Information Request: February 10, 2004 and Environmental Services Land Use Services Division Deadline for Submittal of Information: March 10, 2004 900 oakesdale Avenue Southwest Renton, Washington 98055-1219 A. Access & Traffic- King County Road Standards (KCRS): 1051h Avenue Southeast is classified as urban local access. 1993 King County Road Standards Section 2.03 requires curb gutter and sidewalk along the property frontage unless a variance is obtained. No action is required at this time. B. Drainage- King County Surface Water Design Manual (SWDM): 1. Surface water drainage appears to flow across the property off 105" Avenue Southeast. A drainage easement for this flow shall be provided prior to engineering plan approval unless a diversion adjustment is approved (SWDM Section 1.2.1), allowing the flow to be conveyed along 1051h Avenue Southeast. No action is required at this time unless an adjustment is desired. 2. Neighbors have complained about storm water ponding at the SW property corner. A conceptual drainage plan shall be provided (SWDM Section 1.1.4) which mitigates the flooding problem. (a) A drainage conveyance system may be provided to convey concentrated runoff across the down -slope properties to an acceptable discharge point. Drainage easements for this conveyance system must be secured from downstream property owners and recorded prior to engineering plan approval (SWDM Section 1.2.1.1c). Letters of intent shall be included with the next submittal. (b) Alternatively, you may propose a diversion of the flow entering the property (off 105ih) and conveying it to an acceptable discharge location. The conceptual drainage plan failed to demonstrate compliance with the small site BMP's (SWDM Appendix Q. Verification of compliance shall be included in the conceptual drainage plan. 4. _ Conceptual Drainage Plan: Submit 3 copies of a conceptual drainage plan, which is prepared, stamped, and signed by a professional engineer licensed in the State of Washington. Note: A meeting with L �' g USD staff is recommended prior to the next submittal. Please �OAqcontact Curt Foster at (206) 296-7106 to request a meeting. 9Cr 1,r/P1;IrRf:R.Rnh JI?4/9R nlr: Please submit the following by March 10, 2004: Four copies of a conceptual drainage plan prepared, stamped, and signed by a professional engineer licensed in the State of Washington. 2. Letter of intent from the property owners showing willingness to grant a drainage easement. I A drainage diversion request fro SWDM requirements (if desired). . SCE' I.F/P1 aYSCR_S�ih 9/94/9R r,lr. King County Department of Development and Environmental Services 900 Oakesdale Avenue SW Renton, WA 98055-1219 July 23, 2004 TO: Stafford Smith, King County Hearing Examiner FM: Fereshteh Dehkordi, Project Manager, LUSD RE: Notice of Appeal of Short Plat Decision Appeal File No. L04APO10 The short plat decision for the following project has been appealed. Attached are the relevant documents. Project Name: Ngy Short Plat Project number: L03SO031 Necessary Staff: Curt Foster, Fereshteh Dehkordi Principal issues: Drainage, Zoning Community interest (low) 1 1 3 4 5 (high) Prehearing Conference: 0 Yes ❑ No If yes, suggested earliest date: August 10, 2004 or soon after Time needed for hearing: % a day Suggested earliest hearing date: To be determined later Please call me at (206) 296-7173 if you have questions or need additional information. Attachments cc: Mark Olson, Consulting Engineer Teng Ngy, Applicant Curt Foster, Engineer DDES CRIER Qvu P" CV-7 lob f�•v� 5 o%A � a� fe 7 l4` aOo 4 It is our contention that the allowance of a short plat at the above address will directly impact the neighborhood in a detrimental way. In surrounding lots, there is one home per lot and the building of three large homes on small plats would not retain the character of the area. There has also been significant impact on surrounding homes with surface water runoff since the re -grading of the property has taken place. Our specific concerns are as follows: 2. Surface Water Management (KCC9)- 5. Core Requirements#5--Erosion & Sedimentation Control a) Basis for appeal- impact on surrounding properties b) Harm suffered -runoff going through surrounding yards and draining in septic c) Relief sought -proper control of erosion and sedimentation throughout construction, ongoing inspections to ensure this, proof of proper abandonment of existing septic, Surrounding properties have been adversely impacted with runoff from the Ngy property. In past years there has been minimal rain water during the rain season but never before has there been effluence present. It had left a layer of black, foul smelling goo LO 4AS1 .D 0 10 JUL 12 2004 K.C. D.D.E.S. in our backyard that our dogs track inside the home. This sewer smelling black substance has been dragged into our carpeting necessitating steam cleaning of All carpets at least monthly. There are also health issues to the dogs and humans coming into contact with this matter. Approximately one third of our backyard was underwater at some points this past rain season. We lost fruit bearing trees and -had to have our topsoil -scraped and hauled away at our expense. There is a well -documented history of sewage bubbling into surrounding properties. This is why the previous owner was compelled_to hook up to the city sewer. We believe Mr. Ngy should have been compelled to submit an erosion sedimentation control plan. Until this has been taken care of and actions have been taken to prevent further damage to surrounding properties, we feel his abilities to further develop this site should be terminated. He should also be required to return surrounding properties to the condition before his work began. It is our contention that the effluence is directly coming from the abandoned on site septic system used by the previous owner. We do not believe it was abandoned according to�,the-requirend-pro edure as set forth by �------the Health Department . We can find no f pape-rwer�c--to conf irm or deny this allegation. R & R No 99-01 2 (part) 3- 19-99. We never saw evidence of work done on that property regarding the digging up of the cover, filling in of the tank or crushing of the lid. The water table on the north end of the .property has been changed significantly so that the neighbor on that side is losing trees and shrubs due to lack of.water. Sufficient amounts of the front and north side yards were removed and replaced with questionable retaining wall. We are also concerned that Mr Ngy attempted to coerce one of his contractors to connect to the Howard's drainage system without their consent. He also used unscrupulous tactics when he persuaded a King county engineer to try and negotiate with the Howards in hopes of allowing him do. t bi s•� We have contacted our King County councilman responsible for this area regarding this . 0 to We feel that Mr. Ngy should at the very least present engineering plans that include a technical information report (TIR), a site improvement plan, and an erosion sediment control (ESC) ._plan. In addition, a landscape management plan should be required to comply with Core Requirement #8. (see Section 12.8) "Drainage/erosion control is.required year- round during the construction phase," as stated in your residential Building Permit Process, DDES Information Bulletin #12. If drainage and erosion control is installed by the applicant (Mr. Ngy) inspection is required BEFORE foundation inspection and will be checked by DDES on each subsequent inspection. If there is a problem , a "STOP WORK" Order may be issued until the. problem is resolved. 6. Core Requirement#6. Maintenance and Operation a) Basis for Appeal- we have seen no.printed plans for the sump pump drainage and are not sure it will address the problem. We also are concerned about the lack of a back up system in case of mechanical failure. b) Harm Suffered- there has been contaminated water running.through surrounding yards. We want to make sure this does not enter the storm drain system. c) Relief sought -We would like an independent engineer to oversee this drainage solution. We also do not see where on the property the catch basin will be placed to catch the maximum run off to remove it from the property before affecting surrounding properties. Collectively, the neighbors are concerned about the proposed drainage solution Mr. Ngy has to put in place and what happens to the surrounding properties if the mechanics of this sump system fail. We would like to see a backup system in,place. Also, after the drainage system is in .place and working, we would like it tested.during a season of persistent and sufficient volume where the ground is saturated. We also want to make sure that the run off that is going to be..pumped into the storm. drain system across 105t" Ave does not contain any of the contaminates that are flowing into our yard. ,Not only do we want to prevent erosion and sedimentation, we also want to prevent and mitigate habitat loss,, enhance ground water discharge and prevent water quality degradation. 8. Core Requirements #8 Water Quality a) Basis for appeal- we feel the water is not just rain run off that is entering our surrounding yards, therefore the pump system will be sending contaminated waters to the storm drain system. b) Harm suffered -we do not want contaminated waters polluting the salmon streams and other biotic resources. c) Relief sought -assure the quality of the water draining through the property and make sure the septic has been abandoned properly. We are concerned that tests for the quality of water take place so that the run off does not become a source for water contamination and end up in salmon streams and other biotic resources, along with erosion control and the recreational impact on the environment (Sl) Special Requirement #1 — Other Adopted Requirements 1)KCC 16.82.150 D (Seasonal Clearing Restriction) 2)SC--P3 (Clearing and Grading) a) Basis for appeal -we believe that clearing and grading permits should have been established prior to excavating and clearing the property. He also began this project during the rainy season. b) Harm suffered- we are experiencing erosion and sedimentation into our yards. We have had to have our topsoil scraped and removed due -to sewerage left on.the topsoil. There are several people in surrounding homes that -have been experiencing acute asthma and allergy attacks because the property has not been properly seeded/regarded to prevent dust, weeds and long unkempt grass. c) Relief sought -lawn should be maintained in the areas not directly involved in the construction process. With the possible addition, if approved, of two more lots, this mess will continue for years to come. We believe this property was cleared prior to April 3oth but after October 19t, as stated in the Surface Water Design Manual. He also graded the property with the excavated fill when he dug out the foundation. We have not found evidence of permits for either grading or clearing of the property. There is a history of the side lot on the north side of retaining water for months. With the added run off from lack of vegetation, much more runs through that open space and into surrounding yards. For the first rainy season, 104th Ave SW was closed to all traffic due to being totally overwhelmed with water ... in other words, flooded. The only change in the surrounding area was the -changes made on 17003 105th Ave SE. We also saw Mr. Ngy siphoning water out of his foundation area this past rain season. We witnessed him siphoning this water towards Jeff and Lynn Howard's property (the property west of Ngy's). There was standing water on the entire property through May. We also saw kids playing near a large pit filled with excess water. We were grateful that no one was ever hurt. Once again, Ngy did nothing to.prevent this from being a. hazard. In DDES Customer Bulletin #28 it states: "Whether or not a permit is required, all clearing, filling, or grading must conform to King County Code requirements and must control erosion and protect adjacent properties." "When is a Clearing and Grading Permit Necessary? 1. Accumulative filling and /or excavation exceeding 100 cubic yards; 2. Filling to a depth of three feet or more in any one location; 3. Excavating to a depth of five feet of more in any one location." We feel all three of these requirements have been overlooked at this project. He should have been required to show temporary control facilities such as silt fence, mulching, netting, designed to control runoff during clearing and grading. 3.Health (KCC13) a) Basis for appeal -as mentioned above, there are several neighbors that have been struggling with asthma and allergy symptoms that have either developed or worsened over the past 24 months which the period in which the property has not been maintained in character with surrounding properties. There have been rats in the past few months which we believe if from the food garbage left by the workers and the general condition of the overall piece of property. b) Harm suffered- we have had to have extensive plumbing repairs done to waterlines in the home due to rodent damage. We are being harassed with rodents on our property digging under our foundation and getting under our skirting. We have toy dogs that have been endangered by the running of rodents on the property. c) Relief sought -we want the property kept in the condition characteristic of the neighborhood. We want Mr. Ngy to clean up after his workers to ensure that food garbage containers are not left on s the property. We want Mr. Ngy to supply a port-o--potty for his workers to relieve themselves. We feel that certain health issues have become aggravated during the past few months since.the construction began. At this time, there also has been an abandonment of routine care of the property resulting in long grass, numerous weeds, and added dust and other airborne aggravants. Several neighbors have had serious asthma and allergy conditions.. This property was always cared for with the previous owner. We expect the same care taken by the new owner. 4.Road Standards (KCC 14) a) Basis for appeal- we do not believe a curb is needed on the inside of a piece of property. b) Harm suffered- if there is a curb and sidewalk on the west portion of the lot, it will cause damming of water and divert even more of it to the yard directly south of the Ngy property. c) Relief sought- place the curb and sidewalk on the east side of the property that abuts 105th Ave SE A. "That portion of the west half of 105th Avenue SE adjoining the subject property shall be improved with curb gutter and sidewalk (urban sub access standard, KCRS Section 2.03" We feel a curb gutter and sidewalk on the west half would not be beneficial and recommend that the aforementioned curb gutter and sidewalk be improved on the EAST side of the roperty. 5.Building and Construction Standards (Title 16) a) See S-1 above b) See S-1 above c ) See S-1 above As previously mentioned, grading is a major issue for the surrounding properties. citing KCC .09.04.050 "shall not create a significant adverse impact to downhill properties". We also believe that one of the prohibited discharges is toilet sewerage. We are getting remnants of sewerage in our yards during heavy rain seasons. We feel there have not been sufficient measures to ensure that the sediments and erosion remains on Mr. Ngy's property through use of barriers and seeding. 6.Zoning Code (KCC 21A) A.Density and Dimensions (KCC21A.12) a) Basis for appeal-3410 square feet is not sufficient for an R-8 lot. It is less than 1/16th of an acre. With taking out the PAT acreage, it allows 15,060 square feet which allows 2.76 du/ac. b) Harm suffered- this will devalue surrounding properties. c) Relief sought -allowance of 2 homes on this .4lacre with the needed access road. If allowed, we want Mr. Ngy to extend our fence from the mid point to the front of the yard on the south side of his property to prevent damage to our home and property with his blatant disregard for the codes necessary to build. If allowed, the second and third homes will be built within 12 feet of our home. This would help reduce the noise, dust and dirt while construction is taking place. we believe that 3410 sq ft. does not fulfill the requirements for an R-8 short plat subdivision. "All lots shall meet the density and dimension requirements of the R- 8 zone classification or shall be shown on the face of the approved preliminary short subdivision, whichever is larger." KCC 12A.12 states the "minimum lot area for detached dwellings is 3500 sq. ft. ". Most similar communities require 5400 — 8000 sq ft per lot for R-8 zoning. According to BuySellCyprus.com, " A critical factor in lot valuation is the size and character of typical lots in the area." we feel this over -development of our area would affect the value of our homes adversely. Using the formula set forth on your faq website..."Can my lot be subdivided? For example, property in unincorporated King County zone R-4 and one acre in size can be divided into 4 lots. 43,560 sq ft divided by 4 base density per unit equals 10,890 sq, ft per lot." Taking this one step further, therefore 43, 560 sq ft. divided by 8 for an R-8 zone would equal 5,445. Not anywhere near the 3,410 sq.ft. Mr. Ngy is trying to subdivide to. The private access tract (PAT) for the three plats is approximately 1,800 sq ft. That . property is non --developable so it should be subtracted from the 17,860 sq ft that Mr. Ngy has at this site. We now have 15,060 sq ft. multiplied by 8 as the base density and there should be an allowable amount of 2.76 houses on his lot, not 3. With a lot approved of only 0.07 acre, how is it possible to have only 75% of the lot impervious? B.Street Trees (KCC 21A.6) a) Basis of appeal- none b) Harm suffered- if trees are planted too near to drainage pipes the roots will grow into the pipes and cause possible damage to the sump system. c) Relief sought -management and landscape plan submission Mr.. Ngy should not be able to plan trees in the area of the proposed drainage system or septic pump lines so that roots grow into the lines and make them unserviceable. Other; a) Basis of appeal- none b) Harm suffered- we are experiencing difficulties with passing on the street in front of 17003 10 5th Ave SE and have not been receiving mail or waste collection due to the areas being blocked by Mr. Ngy or his representatives. c) Relief sought- assurance that the parking areas and garage areas will be used and that proper rocking was done for access to the construction site prior to commencing construction to allow work vehicles to park on the property and not in the street. We feel that on street parking will be an .issue. We have spoken to Mr. Ngy about he and his workers parking in the street blocking our mailboxes and trash collection. They are parking with half the vehicles in the road and it has been hard for metro/access buses to get through as well as school district busses. I can only imagine when emergency vehicles need to pass. We do have older citizens in the area and a group home with severely multi -handicapped residents. By Ngy's own admission, he is planning on having the first house be a multi generational house with possibly up to six drivers. Has a two- car garage. We've seen his Bellevue residence, and noted he is parking in the street. That may work there, but on a 19 footwide road (this is the width in front of his property) could block or impede traffic. The neighbors have spoken to Mr.-Ngy about this issue and he said he plans on parking in the street and if we don't like it, we should take it up with King County. He even went so far as to say he would park in front of other's homes. To ensure that the sump system works , King County Code 09.04.100 requires liability insurance that names King County as an additional insured to protect King County from liability. Currently, this amount must not be less than $1,000,000.00 for property damage, any accident, negligence, failure of the facility, or any other liability relating to the construction or maintenance of drainage facilities required by King County Code 09.04.050. The signatures below of residents of 104th Ave SE, 105th Ave SE and 106th Ave SE, are interested in seeing just two homes NO on the property of 17003 105th AveSE. We will take whatever legal mesasures are available to us to make sure #hat over development in our neighborhood does not take place. We also want the property managed in a condition similar to the other properties in the general area. We want the trash cleaned up, the lawn maintained, cars paned on the property instead of in front of neighborring homes and mail boxes. Just to name a few concerns: Name A. Mdrms 1 ? 031 - /OS /70/1 17 e ° `f ry 5fi"k A�� S 17 �d57Y,-d, s� ) �.. I -es -5t-k G-J�'� l 1"'Y z4 10�-44UR� 5 4 i7 Om 7 i -1 o Z A JUL 12 2004 J-1t-702-6 1 b` S,E. K.C. D.D.E.S. �7ULv tv�-�` Avg 3� Al"'k. �qp� • Name Adds-e�as 17006 1n4N +FSC loop' �o - -tl -A-tAe s6 l 1 70 3a /a E; 16►cY2-1 105 t-4v S 4 . Pa�ky o � R'P' C o r 8 Statement of Appeal File No. L03SO031 17003 105' Ave SE Renton, WA Appellants: Timothy A. Mc Cannon Bonnie Bottesch 17007 105th Ave SE Renton, WA 98055 425-277-9569 Christopher H. L. Binkley Michele D. Binkley 17032 1040 Ave SE Renton, WA 98055 425-227-8103 Jeff Howard Lynn Howard 17014 104' Ave SE Renton, WA 98055 425-430-2830 Darren Sweaney Bobbie Sweaney 17004 1051h AVE SE Renton, WA 98055 42 5-277-9204 David Yadock Wendy Yadock' 17020 104th Ave SE Renton, WA 98055 42 5-226-7518 on) JUL 111004 K.C. D.D.1=.S, Heath Conner Miyumi Conner 17010 104th Ave SE Renton, WA 98055 Margaret King 16829 105th Ave SE Renton, WA 98055 TO I Q, T ,.31n r ;�"a�"}li 'I�t4 1�' } 11` � k ts• � °� "R 41 �hII I rd :I; ifs'!. h ' II M{ ,�'W�.A a i i h •.b A -N I Ft �I � ISY} r l3r�� a14�LL� r rr) ^ I Y• 1 r r e i + y i-^at� i Yi 1,• h I w nV,�'h�.d�,r•'.IM! > e i � x I 'r '� f } '- �`� � R 4b rt�" a M k � !3 �u�,�iu� {.b „L";£x'kk ��•'a * }� �' '��� 1 ! 7ty�rl tff �_,�� � ,v'� �.IY"' Y.r } � r r. r� :CN I ti.,F sf _'. z '?�J �j i..�A�:�'• I vt� '. �� q�l,r�' L 'I s , ry ry9ey� � �i ;.�'� � y� r •G 'Tsy.�5 .� � {au "A �f IF't i" ;7 �, '# n q � 44 � r '. u`ri" .t l ,`�•.^ W �"R6 � �"' -., ,r 99 1 }. f• 1 7 S I� r ,M'R 3 �$' u% � r)-�f �hxU �' ,.atr -.5 I i �� y�r,. Y ,,, I � �' �• ;�iM °rk�Y" r 4 �f hr A r All j�y 1;� r.1 ,M I it l 4ya ..' r wf } '�'nry�'tyJ4y' • �. 7, ' lil,�' 4 ?♦. 'FS' :kl I. j''�'� Y-'✓, I bra"•Y :; 0 F- . C= !9 0 L.- ujjo C= 0 b m cz -F cn 9N.,. SOC Page 1 of I DUDES King County Department of Development and Environmental Services 900 OAcsdale Ave SW kenton, Washington 98055-1219 July 8, 2004 !Y 3U111111 al .Ut V'-Uar es anu rd ments Applicant: MC CANNON, TIMOTHY A. Activity Number: L04AP010 17007 105TH AVE SE Project Number: L03SO031 RENTON, WA 98055 Development Number: Permit Type: APPEAL-L 206-277-9569 Status: FILED Charges Description Amount Appeals $250.00 SUB TOTAL CHARGES: S250.00 PaMents -- _ Description Check # Checklogid Payee Date Entered Amount SUB TOTAL PAYMENTS: $0.00 BALANCE: $250.00 The fees shown above represent current charges as of this date and are an estimate based on the information provided to DDES at the time of application. For services that are rendered on an hourly basis, the cost of those services will be based on the actual hours worked. Hourly fees are charged at the rate in effect at the time of service, and will be billed monthly, along with any other outstanding fees. Fees that have been posted prior to permit Issuance will be collected at that time. Fees subsequently posted will be billed to the applicant All fees must be paid in full before DDES i*sues Final Approval, T.C.O. or C.O. 1� 2. Surface Water Management (KCC 9) 1998 King County Surface Water Design Manual (SWDM) A. This short subdivision proposal is subject to Full Drainage Review perfS ection 1.1.2.3). Final short subdivision approval shall require full compliance with drainage provisions and storm drainage requirements of this section. Compliance may result in reducing the number and/or location of lots shown on the approved preliminary short subdivision. The conditions outlined below are site -specific drainage conditions: (1) Core Requirement #1 - Discharge at the Natural Location Note: A drainage adjustment is required to pump tkedrainage from the southwest corned to the ditch along 105`h Avenue Southeast (SWDM Section 1.2.4.3). Approval is anticipated. (2) Core Requirement #2 - Off -Site Analysis (3) Core Requirement #3 - Flow Control (4) Core Requirement #4 - Conveyance System Notes: 1) Drainage easements are required across Lot 2 allowing a minimum undisturbed flow path of 25 feet for BMP's located on Lots 1 and 3. 2) Additionally, an easement is required across Lots 2 and 3 for the drainage pumped back to 105`' Avenue SE (5) Core Requirement #5 - Erosion & Sedimentation Control (6) Core Requirement #6 - Maintenance and Operation (7) Core Requirement #7 - Financial Guarantees & Liability (8) Core Requirement #8 - Water Quality (S 1) Special Requirement #1 - Other Adopted Requirements Notes: 1) KCC 16.82.150 D (Seasonal Clearing Restriction) 2) SC-P3 (Clearing and Grading) 3) SO-220 (Significant Trees) B. A professional civil engineer licensed in the State of Washington shall prepare a Technical Information Report and/or engineering plans per Chapter 2, of the 1998 King County Surface Water Design Manual. 4. Road Standards (KCC 14) 1993 King County Road Standards, Ordinance 11187 Final short subdivision approval shall require full compliance with the provisions set forth in the King County Road Standards including engineering plans for all road improvements. The engineering plans shall be prepared by a professional civil engineer licQnsed in the State of Washington. DDES strongly recommends the /� ii i�ic�iii► ,ai,� v� AUVI[lll6HU uc ,� uo< <.,v vu. a ..v. -•-- rp oject. The following conditions are road requirements for this short subdivision and shall be satisfied, unless a variance is obtained or unless otherwise approved by DDES (Section 1.03). cam_ That portion of the west half of 1051h Avenue SE adjoining the subject property shall be improved with curb gutter and sidewalk (urban subaccess standard, KCRS Section 2.03). ,_—B. The on -site road (serving more than 2 lots) shall be constructed to private minor access standards (KCRS Section 2.06). The tract shall be extended into the property to the point that adequately serves the front lots (20 foot minimum). The road shall be located in a private access tract (PAT) with undivided ownership to the lots it serves, and the lot owners shall be responsible for its maintenance. A panhandle may be extended from Lot 2 to the PAT. C. The following notes shall be shown on the final recorded short subdivision: (1) Warning: King County has no responsibility to build, improve, maintain or otherwise service the private roads contained within or providing service to the property described in this short subdivision. (2) All private easements and/or tracts to be maintained, repaired, and/or rebuilt by the owners of the parcels having legal access therefrom and their heirs, assigns or successors, unless and until such roads are improved to King County standards and are dedicated and accepted by King County for maintenance. D. All restrictions, easements, tracts, and their purpose shall be shown on the final recorded short subdivision. Foster, Curt From: Foster, Curt Sent: Thursday, ,July 22, 2004 11:34 AM To: Dehkordi, Fereshteh; Arkills, Chris Subject: RE: Ngy Short Plat LO3S0031 Hi Chris, In regards to the drainage issue, there is an existing water ponding problem located just off -site near the southwest property corner. The bulk of this water appears to be the result runoff coming from 105th Avenue Southeast (no ditch). The developer proposes to install a curb along the edge of the road to collect this runoff and pipe it to the ditch along the east side of the road. This will eliminate off -site road runoff from entering the property and the problem area. KCSWDM 1.2.2.2 states "a development must not significantly aggravate existing downstream problems or create new problems as a result of developing the site". We believe that the developer has proposed adequate mitigation in an effort to resolve the ponding problem. Concerning the easement issue, yes I did write a letter to the neighbor asking if he would grant Mr. Ngy a drainage easement for the purpose of piping the ponded water down slope to 104th Avenue Southeast. The neighbor declined. I did this in an effort to resolve the drainage issue and do not believe it was a conflict ofinterest. Curt Foster -----Original Message ----- From: Dehkordi, Fereshteh Sent: Wednesday, July 21, 2004 3:28 PM To: Arkills, Chris Cc: Foster, Curt Subject: RE: Ngy Short Plat L03S0031 Chris This short plat received a preliminary approval on June 18th with conditions to improve the site's frontage and comply with the SWDM standards for drainage. The area is R-8 and based on the site's area, it meets the density for creating three lots. Currently, there is a house being constructed on the parent parcel. Please see the attached conditions of approval. Neighbors have recently appealed our decision and I have asked the Examiner's Office to schedule a pre -hearing conference. Curt Foster is the reviewing engineer who can help you with the engineering conditions. We feel that the proposed short subdivision will comply with the applicable codes provided all the conditions of the preliminary approval are met. Regardless we will go ahead with appeal hearing process so the neighbors can voice out their concerns before the Hearing Examiner. Any questions, please contact me again. Fereshteh Dehkordi -----Original Message ----- From: Arkills, Chris Sent: Friday, June 25, 2004 4:39 PM To: Dehkordi, Fereshteh; Foster, Curt Subject: FW: 20 lbs of s*** in a 10 lb bag... Hello-- I would like to have a chan4- to discuss the situation below—ith either/both of you to get a better.understanding of the situation. Chris Arkills Legislative Aide to Councilmember Dwight Pelz District Five (206) 296-1637 mailto:chris.arkills@metrokc.gov -----Original Message ----- From: Pelz, Dwight Sent: Tuesday, June 22, 2004 10:04 AM To. 'tim' Cc: Arkills, Chris Subject: RE: 20 1bs of s*** in a 10 lb bag... I will have my aide Chris Arkills look into your concerns. -----Original Message ----- From: tim [mailto:timamcc@earthlink.net] Sent: Monday, June 21, 2004 5:38 PM To: dwight.pelz@metrokc.gov Subject: 20 lbs of s*** in a 10 lb bag... Hello Mr Pelz: My name is Tim McCannon. I live in an area of primarily single family dwellings on lots that are around .2 or .4 acres on average. Recently, we've had the lot next door to us purchased by Teng Ngy who is planning on cramming 3 houses on a .41 acres. The proposed parcels are 7,810 sq ft, 6,826 sq ft and 3,410 sq ft. The last one seems to be much tinier than one would expect would be permissible. It is surveyed at .07 acres. With a house and a driveway, this will leave very little else. This also doesn't fit into the character of the neighborhood, which as I mentioned is one house per lot, not three. We realize that the area is zoned R8, but our understanding is that the lots should be of more or less equal,size. If it helps you, the file number is L03S0031, the property address is 17003 105th Ave SE, Renton. It has unfortunately been approved by the DDES planner, but we are planning to appeal the decision. We have a few concerns, not the least of which is a huge drainage problem. DDES has said they are satisfied with Ngy's proposed solution, but it seems vague at best. We are also concerned that Ngy has been able to get King County personnel to try and negotiate easements for him with our neighbors to help him with his drainage problem. This seems like a conflict of interest to us. Thank you, Tim McCannon 17007 105th Ave SE Renton, Wa 98055 (425)277-9569 (425)830-8421 (cell) ,,3()� Ao--VM035 March 8, 2004 L-OVs0034 Teng Ngy 5563 156`h Avenue SE Bellevue, WA 98006 Dear Mr. Ngy: This letter is in response to your letter dated February 25, 2004 (enclosed), in which you are requesting an easement be granted onto our property for the purpose of water drainage. We are denying your request for the easement. The size of your property is large enough for a drain field to be constructed, thus no easement is necessary. Sincerely, Jeffrey S. Howard v--cc: Feres�e,+-e-LA enclosure � f <'O r'O( 1 Lynn K. Howard King County Department of Development and Environmental Services To f Eff6 12 V 4 4 t// //,/ low Alz V . 17014 T K� �/, :�;t .� To PHONE 12�7' /r �' � ��!' ��S � SUBJECT l�ip�q i� d�4{,t !� 2G !� f f i'1 /t r Ya f/1 �%�U JL T DATE 7 714- MESSAGE 117 /z f' 17''v 7-1-1414 71/,6 p& VE GOA7FA lAqi_ 's 7 .5&/)/L7 r (,l r 11111 ja Vlal� /L ell-W 73 04. t/t fi lle,11- 7o /G/ii ✓ 1 4 ZA4�4 1A,/� 6 6 i% 70 Z)d 7141C plol'K ? /���use- c,tt<. XjC . T v.STf. Dv - SIGNED (REPLY SIGNED DATE F-386 PINK COPY FOR FILE 4 /87 YELLOW COPY FOR REPLY ed. w 9 UA King County Department of Development and Environmental Services 900 Oakesdale Avenue SW Renton, WA 98055-1219 March 4, 2004 Teng Ngy -5563 156'' Avenue Southeast Bellevue, WA 98006 RE: Application for the Prelimina Short Plat DDES File No. L03S0031 Dear Mr. Ngy: Thank you for your request for an extension of the deadline for the submittal of the additional information required to process your preliminary short plat application. The request for additional information stops all processing of the plat application until the required information is received. The time spent waiting for information to be submitted is not counted toward any time limit requirements of the plat application process. The February 10, 2004 letter provided a deadline of March 10, 2004 for the submittal of the requested information. We are granting a final extension to this deadline. If the Land Use Services Division of DDES does not receive the necessary information requested to process your application by May 10, 2004, your application may be canceled or denied. If you have any questions regarding this matter, please call me at (206) 296-7173. Sincerely, Fereshteh Dehkordi, Project/Program Manager Current Planning Section, Land Use Services Division CC: Curt Foster, Senior Engineer, Engineering Review Section File February 25, 2004 Ferehteh Dehkordi Project Manager Department of Development And Environment Services 900 Oakesdale Ave SW Renton, Wa 98055-1219 Dear Ms Dehkordi: Persuant to your letter dated 02/10/04, I would like to ask for the extensio of 60 da s. The reason is I sun into the problem solving the drainage related question 1. Once before my backyard neighbor v..cftlly_give me the easement to tie the'drainage to.,their system. Now they change the mind. 2. I have talked to Curt that I am willing to pay for the asphalt berm along the edge of the roadway to the intersection so the water can run off to the ditch for the water on the 1051h Ave SE.. I will do the curb, gutter and sidewalkin front of my property after the short plat is approved, Please let me know and thank you for your cooperation. Sincerely, or Teng Ngy 5563-156'h Ave SE Bellevue, WA 99006 King County Department of Development and Environmental Services 900 Oakesdale Avenue SW Renton, WA 98055-1219 LAND USE SERVICES DIVISION ROUTING / TRANSMITTAL FORM February 10, 2004 TO: Kim Claussen, Planner III, Current Planning Section FM: Ray Florent, Engineer 1I1, Engineering Review Section Steve Van Patten, PLS Engineer II RE: Proposed NGY Short Plat LUSD File No. L03SO031 We have concluded our preliminary review of the boundary and survey issues for the proposed short plat and include our findings as follows: 1. The legal description for this project is the East half of Lot 10 of Akers Farm No. 5. The legal for the westerly adjoiner appears to be described as the "West half of Lot .10", which creates more then one possible location for the west line of this project. The Surveyor for this project has calculated said west boundary line by the split of the north and south lines of the underlying Lot 10 —'rather then a split by area. Based on the above observations, we have the following boundary concerns that must be addressed at final Short Plat approval: 1) The Surveyor should verify the dimensions for the north and south boundary lines. A record of survey under recording number 8908099011 was filed for Lot 9 (the adjoiner to the north) and a record of survey under recording no 9110219022 was filed for Lot I 1 (the adjoiner to the south) both of which suggest shorter lengths. Note that the shorter lengths create a better fit to the existing fence; 2) The Surveyor should be prepared to .demonstrate how his west line will fit alternative lines as established by area, at time of final review; 3) The surveyor should add a "Surveyors Note" to the Final Short Plat document summarizing his methodology for establishing the west boundary line, including mention of the methodology of previous surveys in the area and how. his methodology fits the existing fence; 2. Additional survey control and survey procedure may be requested and reviewed at time of final plat approval, including issues of proration and fit to road centerline monumentation from previous record. 3. Pursuant to KCC 19A.08.150, add a statement to the preliminary plan that the contours are based on an actual field survey. 4. Pursuant to KCC 19A.08.150, please add one more temporary bench mark for a total of two temporary bench marks. 5. Pursuant to KCC 19A.08.130, the vertical datum should be NAVD 88. Please revise the "SOOS CREEK" based elevations to NAVD 88 and show the benchmark used on the plans, unless the requirements of KCC 19A.08.130 regarding the allowable use of an alternative vertical datum applies -- in which case add a note to the plan stating that an alternative vertical datum was used pursuant to the criteria contained in KCC 19A.08.130. Cc: Curt Foster King County Department of Development and Environmental Services 900 Oakesdale Avenue SW Renton, WA 98055-1219 February 10, 2004 Teng Ngy 5563 156`h Avenue SE Bellevue, WA 98006 RE: Notice of Re uest-fnrnUli— 3hal Information or Studies Applicatiop . LWS003 Date Filed: Nov mkt` i4, 2003 Date of Complete Application: December 11, 2063 Dear Mr. Ngy: The purpose of this letter is to notify you pursuant to Ordinance 12196 that the Land Use Services Division is requesting additional information and/or studies to complete the review of your project. The information is described on the enclosed plat screening transmittal. When submitting the requested information, include a copy of the plat screening transmittal and retain a copy for your records. Provide a cover letter which lists how each item was addressed. Any clarification or explanation of the submittal can also be included in the cover letter. Please submit the information to: King County Dept. of Development and Environmental Services LAND USE SERVICES DIVISION ATTN: Fereshteh Dehkordi, Current Planning Section 900 Oakesdale Avenue Southwest Renton, WA 98055-1219 If the submittal is hand delivered, submit it at the address above. Your application is on "hold" from the date of this notice, until the date you are advised that the additional information satisfies this request, or 14 days after the date the information has been provided. You will be notified if the Division determines that the information is insufficient. Please note that the supplemental information required after vesting of a complete application shall not affect the validity of such application. The deadline for the submittal of the necessary information is March 10, 2004. In the event you feel extenuating circumstances exist which may justify an extension of this date, you may submit such request, in writing, for consideration by this department. Failure to meet the deadline shall be cause for the Department to cancel or deny the application. If you have any questions regarding the additional information or the submittal deadline, please call me at (206) 296-7173. Sincerely, Fereshteh Dehkordi, Project/Program Manager Current Planning'Section, Land Use Services Division cc: Tom Tuma, Tuma Engineers and Land Surveyors Curt Foster, Senior Engineer, Engineering Review Section Application File 0 - Short Plat Screening Transmi«al King county LUSD File No. L03SO031 Department of Development Date of Information Request: February 10, 2004 and Environmental Services Land Use Services Division Deadline for Submittal of Information: March 10, 2004 900 Oakesdale Avenue Southwest Renton, Washington 98055-1219 ►v B. Access & Traffic- King County Road Standards (KCRS): 105`h Avenue Southeast is classified as urban local access. 1993 King County Road Standards Section 2.03 requires curb gutter and sidewalk along the property frontage unless a variance is obtained. No action is required at this time. Drainage- King County Surface Water Design Manual (SWDM): Surface water drainage appears to flow across the property off 105`h Avenue Southeast. A drainage easement for this flow shall be provided prior to engineering plan approval unless a diversion adjustment is approved (SWDM Section 1.2.1), allowing the flow to be conveyed along 1051h Avenue Southeast. No action is required at this time unless an adjustment is desired. 2. Neighbors have complained about storm water ponding at the SW property corner. A conceptual drainage plan shall be provided (SWDM Section 1.1.4) which mitigates the flooding problem. (a) A drainage conveyance system may be provided to convey concentrated runoff across the down -slope properties to an acceptable discharge point. Drainage easements for this conveyance system must be secured from downstream property owners and recorded prior to engineering plan approval (SWDM Section 1.2.1.1c). Letters of intent shall be included with the next submittal. (b) Alternatively, you may propose a diversion of the flow entering the property (off 105`h) and conveying it to an acceptable discharge location. The conceptual drainage plan failed to demonstrate compliance with the small site BMP's (SWDM Appendix Q. Verification of compliance shall be included in the conceptual drainage plan. 4. Conceptual Drainage Plan: Submit 3 copies of a conceptual drainage plan, which is prepared, stamped, and signed by a professional engineer licensed in the State of Washington. Note: A meeting with LUSD staff is recommended prior to the next submittal. Please contact Curt Foster at (206) 296-7106 to request a meeting. .scr IY/P1at.SC:R.Siih 7/74/4R rrlr, Please submit the following by March 10, 2004: Four copies of a conceptual drainage plan prepared, stamped, and signed by a professional engineer licensed in the State of Washington. 2. Letter of intent from the property owners showing willingness to grant a drainage easement. 3. A drainage diversion request fro SWDM requirements (if desired). s'r T.F/PI AtSCR,.4uh 7/7.4/9R r.lr. Ct: Lu to z UJ ue a O tJ 0 LU U King County . Department of Development and Environmental Services 900 Oakesd ale Avenue soul hwest Renton, WA 98055-1219 MEMORANDUM FROM: Site Investigator S TO: Engineer GufZT Fos ER (m 1 RE: Field Check Observations I. PROJECT NUMBER j_ NAME Address / Location Related Project # / l Date I ~ 8 - 3 Thomas Map Page (new)_ (D t2(0 U(0 Thomas Guide Page (old) 2. SYNOPSIS OF PROPOSAL lei 7 _.I♦ 3. SIERRA FILE INFORMATION Parcel #(s) Kroll Map -LODI W _Acres / Feet? o. Li j A Cu Community Plan Comprehensive Plan S-T-R 5W _29 - 2-3_ ._05 Zoning Q- gj- Sd Limited Text Entry 2-SUFF I ?L _ l<C_Cr (��_, �Z. So D . 5.c- P3 , So - 220 PAGE 1 IG'i� 4. SENSITIVE AREAS INFORMATION MAP FOLIO PAGE## SITECONTAINS YES NO SITE ABUTS YES NO COMMENTS • Wetlands ❑ ® ❑ Wetland # Wetland Class Drainage Basin Sub Basin C Critical Basin? • Streams ❑ ® ❑ R Stream Class Stream Name • 100-year Floodplain _❑ ®_ _ ❑ • Erosion Hazard ❑ ® -_.❑ M • Landslide Hazard ❑ & ❑ M • Seismic Hazard ❑ • Coal Mine Hazard �❑ • Other known SA's —❑ ao Class I or 2 Stream or Class I Wetland within one mile downstream of project site? �S FEMA FIRM number ' * In FEMA Floodplain? ❑Y 0 Soils Mapped ' ' At 'C, Map # I l Best available Topographical Map C I r Y O O +r U 1 S. SITE DESCRIPTION MATCHES T.I.R, DESCRIPTION? 17-HE...SQUARE: HI -ACRE r r ■ L [o aR r r 1 r \ ►1i� p_m C20E2 r ip w • I ! • isr 1 ■■ ■h PAGE 2 G. EXISTING SITE FEATURES Unmapped Sensitive Areas: NON dF- SEIFM Soils types seen and evidence of soil movement, slides, slumps, erosion, or deposition: -Ground?,ALip'_ Existing Utilities (hydrants, signs, poles, etc.) shown on site plan? YES _ Wildlife and habitats: N01_1.1E_ SEEM Water Wells: Work started on site? HVQSE LA-10 Z Closed depression >5000 feee? ❑r Steep slopes? 7.• DRAINAGE Drainage complaint records 19 5-031'05 (M Proposal will add >5000ft2 of new impervious surface? © ® Approximate Area Proposal will collect and concentrate surface and storm water runoff from an upland and site drainage area of over 5000 ft.2? © ® Approximate Area I Upland Drainage Basin (draining directly onto site): CS �s Lot7 fi EAST 54'OE dF S E v hA E re—DA-P 5L/aEACC ZI&LOFF NL 1 !. !�..1�. • ■■ M may_ Downstream Draina e (minimum 114 mile distance): - Q_RMhAA'bE n-ows AcpzcsS r , o1 _(M A'YRIE Q9 P?-Wl Q1• • r r i- + a1 r g3 PAGE 3 S. EXISTING ROAD NETWORK On -site Roads ] 1 eT DRIVE Adjacent Roads L_LCST i A",VC SC P L_o C-i n5-1- Soo - 2_0' Val I U Closest Transit Stop 8. ESTIMATE OF PROJECT IMPACTS ON SOIL AND WATER 9. ADDITIONAL COMMENTS �[ 1 IA E-c r- t..LI L1 C-A G _ � _ r�-1 AT_ FW (WS A �+ UQ092 BEMSOW RD J. _ &JD ElOW 500-11 r t-1 ` HT W rST S lDE bF PAGE 4 10 CONSTRUCTION SIGNS WITHIN 500 FEET AND ADJACENT USE 1 1 NUMBER OF PHOTOGRAPHS TAKEN a PAGE 5 ATTACHMENT TO MEMORANDUM PROJECT NUMBER: FIELDIOFFICE SKETCH WORK: Drainage systems, features, channels within the upland site plan areas, on the development site, and in the downstream receiving areas; SKETCHED BY: SCALE Notes: PAGE 6 ^T � '^"v^`y`! � ' ' 4a �-' 1 l A!r Y .,�• a fP ,� ,. ,� rw,w».y„W.............•,._.,...� ...,�,. y EA.,, .ors„` .. PI,iinrG fkdr fVa D'u ! Street Namw City.ld: FKC ,Si{�tdwrsrarr:;, ` ress 17003 105TH AVE SE �� Lot: re Area: 17.935.06„Acie 0 41, y Zoning:` R-8' 17003105TH AVE SF ! Census Tlact- Pgrriiary O'wnel-�I_nforrnstro� X!Cnord: Y Co��rc�91� _ Add f ,F Lea pmriation Parcel done:. DONALDSON JAMES S� #&1; 17003 1057 H AVE SE re RENTON WAS— e � °s n tj }, 9 , !P 98055 i r i A �y C� o 1 ,.. PhonPhonee 1: _ � ux . � a � Tom. �F. < Status: ACTIVE Notation: ±TQO - Ni wKING COlYA Veron:v',47,24n r AV JI. „ , .. .,. . �..,� ... Friday. Dec 05, 2003 03:02 PM ;Parcel 6t�;�a ,.# IT "Nome Isom f'li: ual1, 008700.0133 B03MO225 ADDIMPF REST A 02/0712003 ISSUED NGY TENG 008700.0133 BOW803 ADDIMPF RESI A 09/11/2003 ISSUED NGY TEND & MORANY 008700.0133 996A1384 ACCESSf I ACCESSRY IP A 05/03/1996 1 EXPIRED NESSAHN 008700.0133 L03SO031 PRE-SP PRE-SP 11114/2003 JAPPLIED NYG, TENG v ro� Record: 1 of 5 MA . s .7177,777,., ..� . a "' `•s'atC, e.: .'vFi:S��, 4d§a,Eiaii' $!'�5tr?�b.zzPs` "`.;:: " a.(',,, " �,� �3 . o• i ., i", r-3'pY`L." ,I Q 000700-0133 � W. �i �k "�: �a�i;�;;,SF,� a '� tS�leet°Multrples °'Set u�'Q F v,�``, _, f �Iters. c rq Show Address AttacFim is13 Status:. `Su5T3ipe: Back" Stop_ J i ---'''` _ S,E~riter Beti v �= ,d#Date s '... ', ,a .,• .,.- e „ -c C.. rt.e Y -J-7717 ::°_ r 0ider — X �•. p11 ' �' a '� eY'a" ' E, o''- :fir• e ; 6 . ,, t '� t Friday, Dec 05, 2003 03:03 PM ° � j` �/I j�J./11 •qy�a� !{/e. i kQ'r'� �'E�s-f ,.. V 3 �yi r ;� 1� a M.\jwli\1 .lPI' !'Y •. ' �§N���- �: K31'PnyaV •VEll, 1FIR I tRar6el Number., Ll.. E !., „apa 0 17003105TFk AVE SE i rlUr(Ik'itr S�ts,ddres KC Pt st i Ciky,' K� ` gyp i�ac e: ? e l �• 11124/1�998 t - -- Qwrwt dame [1 �L:estUpdate rt 09�9/1512000 'Y � „ a, LL w a� r"�.'i � e gs l °, n 4 j •� � `(� �a 'e�x,=`+.` g`:` x 'i , ° ««<Location fn#ormakiQrti>» ''«C c<Oevel merti lnfcimat%on>'>»> 114-Sec-Twp-Rng SW 29 23 05 tBef.No. Zone 1 R-8-SO -- _ `PlafName . AKERS FARMS NO. 05 —] Zone'2. Lot N©. 10 —� r ;Blk, No. Zone 3 -,� _ Acres 0.41 _� ,;.°Ft.: 17,935 Zoninffective0ate:..� . Ktcll Pg 601_j r' �p Via' _ hand Use.Co, e ' --- �e Fi uTaficMt. lane; Cpmprensi aFi0l`i7isttick 403RRen7ton)Coriniuriityf?lan�yy"mCC��'' %.,° SoosCre42 >. 40mt'v#�°`��° ; Y I 1i►'j1eF .y,+.,.�-t�f9� 1i1 ,.+cN.:7 3, a ' pc`�s'#: iyv 41i4Ft .1� FY SY sm�r4 Vll� .Kid '", kfl �r � q' V pK r� �• �bia�v. �6F,s 4� ^14v1, iA Y.kic $F Y7e'l�, AI TBe�,„i 'F _ e�a°e, [ 3$f.�E r a"� Fu j`�?s �2' $'• °q-� 8yo z Yi Yt t, ��.... �..�. � — �'R .�'`$� # °'� +Pp "i ti,, �° L '' 'S "¢...�,�, k I,� .��x a � ( �,n�k3�• �g�p,'ZYY $ewer b"tfii t' Soos Creeks cF -aS t, a E J'tz� Friday, Dec 05, 2003 03:03 PM BDOA KING COUNTY DEPT OF ASSESSMENTS BDO1 PAI11280-S1 REAL PROPERTY LEGAL DESCRIPTION 12/05/03 15:05:30.8 ACCOUNT: 008700-0133-0 SITUS: 17003 105TH AV SE 98055 TAXPAYER: NGY TENG QSTR: SW 29 23 05 JURS: KING CO LEGAL DESCRIPTION - PAGE 1 LOT 10 BLOCK 2 PLAT: AKERS FARMS NO. 05 AKERS FARMS # 5 E 1/2 * END OF LEGAL DESCRIPTION * ( 0j) CHOOSE ONE OPTION: PRESS <PRINT> TO PRINT SCREEN, <ENTER> FOR MORE LEGALS, <PF2> FOR CHARACTERISTICS, <PF6> FOR HISTORY, <PF7> FOR TAXES OR <PF8> TO END. BDOA ACCOUNT: 008700-0133-0 TAXPAYER: NGY TENG LOT: 10 BLK: 2 KING COUNTY DEPT OF ASSESSMENTS BD01 . PA111270-Sl REAL PROPERTY HISTORY 12/05/03 15:05:59,2 SITUS: 17003 105TH AV SE 98055 QSTR: SW 29 23 05 PLAT: AKERS FARMS NO. 05 * A S S E S S E D, V A L U E H I S T O R Y YEAR LAND IMPS DATE REASON 04 61,000 116,000 07/03 REVALUE 03 59,000 108,000 09/02 REVALUE 03 57,000 100,000 04/02 SR CIT CHANGE 02 57,000 100,000 04/02 SR CIT CHANGE 02 28,000 50,600 07/01 REVALUE O1 28,000 50,600 05/00 REVALUE 00 28,000 50,600 08/99 REVALUE 99 28,000 50,600 10/98 REVALUE 99 40,000 50,000 04/98 EXTENSION 98 28,000 50,600 11/97 S.C. FROZEN V 98 40,000 50,000 09/97 REVALUE * * * CONTINUED CHOOSE ONE OPTION: PRESS <PRINT> TO PRINT SCREEN, <PF2> FOR CHARACTERISTICS, <PF4> FOR LEGAL, <PF' JURS: KING CO * S A L E S H I S T 0 R Y DATE SALES PRICE REMARKS 03/02 145,000 DEED * END OF SALES HISTORY ( - 0.8) _- <ENTER> FOR MORE HISTORY, �> FOR TAXES OR <PFS> TO END. BDOA ACCOUNT: 008700-0133-0 TAXPAYER: NGY TENG LOT: 10 BLK: 2' * A S S E S S E D YEAR LAND 97 28,000 97 28,000 95 28,000 93 32,700 91 30,000 89 89 23,900 87 22,500 85 21,000 83 21,000 KING COUNTY DEPT OF ASSESSMENTS BDOI PAI11270-S1 REAL, PROPERTY HISTORY 12/05/03 15:06:03.8 SITUS: 17003 105TH AV SE 98055 QSTR: SW 29 23 05 PLAT: AKERS FARMS NO. 05 V A L U E H I S T O R Y IMPS DATE REASON 50,600 11/96 S.C. FROZEN V 50,600'09/96 REVALUE 50,600 10/94 REVALUE 41,600 03/92 REVALUE 36,200 07/90 REVALUE 02/88 LEVY CODE CHN 23,200 01/88 REVALUE 18,600 07/86 REVALUE 19,200 04/84 REVALUE 19,200 05/82 REVALUE JURS: KING CO * S A L E S H I S T O R Y DATE SALES PRICE REMARKS 03/02 145,000 DEED * END OF VALUE HISTORY * * END OF SALES HISTORY ( 5.4) CHOOSE ONE OPTION: PRESS <PRINT> TO PRINT SCREEN, <PF2> FOR CHARACTERISTICS, <PF4> FOR LEGAL, <PF7> FOR TAXES OR <PF8> TO END. Parcel Number. 0087000133 Taxpayer NGY TENG Annexation: NIA Jurisdiction: Unincorporated Fling County Situs Address: 17003 105TH AVE SE Postal City: Renton, 98055 Plat Name: AKERS FARMS NO. 05; Rec: nil Lot: 10; Block: 2 Kroll Page: 601 W Thomas Bros. Page: 656 1/4-S-T-R: SW-29-23-5 Acres: 0.41 (17935 SgFt.) Current Zoning: R-8-SO Potential Zoning: Comp. Plan land Use: um Assessor's Open Space: NIA Commercial Use: NIA Number of Units: NIA Mobile Home: N Appraised Land Value: 59000 (2003), 61000 (2004) Appraised Improvements Value: 108000 (2003), 116000 (2004) Community Plan Area: Soos Creek Unincorporated Area Council: WA School District: Renton School District 403 Fire District: 40 Roads MPS Zone: 334 ($1770.00) Waterfront: Water Service: Water Service Planning Area: Soos Creek Water And Sewer District Sewer Service: Airport Noise Remedy Program: NIA Bald Eagle Flag: WA Council District (1996-2001): 6 Rob McKenna (R) Council District (2002): 5 Dwight Pelz Drainage Basin: Black River, WRIA 9 Police: King County, Pct: 3, Dist: F3 Service/Finance Strategy Area: Full Service wfrransit Priority Snowload Zone: Standard Agricultural Production District: N Forest Production District N Rural Forest Focus Area: N TDR Type: WA TDR Status: NIA TDR Permit Number. WA Building Inspection Area: Cleo Rubalcaba Clearing Inspection Area: Jim Ballweber Code Enforcement Inspection Area: DenoBe Olegba ESA Inspection Area: Kathy Newborn Grading Inspection Area: Ramon Locsin Land Use Inspection Area: Jae Huh Sens. Areas Notice(s) on Title: Parcel Number 0087000133 Taxpayer. NGY TENG Annexation: NIA Jurisdiction: Unincorporated King County Situs Address: 17003 105fH AVE SE Postal City: Renton, 98055 Plat Name: AKERS FARMS NO. 05; Rec: nil Lot:10; Block: 2 Kroll Page: 601 W Thomas Bros. Page: 656 1/4-S-T-R: SW-29-23-5 Acres: 0.41 (17935 SgFt.) Current Zoning: R-8-SO Potential Zoning: Comp. Plan Land Use: um Assessor's Open Space: NIA Commercial Use: NIA Number of Units: NIA Mobile Home: N Appraised Land Value: 59000 (2003). 61000 (2004) Appraised Improvements Value: 108000 (2003),116000 (2004) Community Plan Area: Soos Creek Unincorporated Area Council: NIA School District: Renton School District 403 Fire District: 40 Roads MPS Zone: 334 ($1770.00) Waterfront: Water Service: Water Service Planning Area: Soos Creek Water And Sewer District Sewer Service: Airport Noise Remedy Program: NIA Bald Eagle Flag: NIA Council District (1996-2001): 6 Rob McKenna (R) Council District (2002): 5 Dwight Pelz Drainage Basin: Black River, WRIA 9 Police: King County, Pct: 3, Dist: F3 ServicelFinance Strategy Area: Full Service wlTransit Priority Snowload Zone: Standard Agricultural Production District: N Forest Production District: N Rural Forest Focus Area: N TDR Type: NIA TDR Status: NIA TDR Permit Number. NIA Building Inspection Area: Cleo Rubalcaba Clearing Inspection Area: Jim Ballweber Code Enforcement Inspection Area: DenoBe Olegba ESA Inspection Area: Kathy Newborn Grading Inspection Area: Ramon Locsin Land Use Inspection Area: Jae Huh Sens. Areas Notices) on Title: file IIedlt $i PIIfifiGiV4! . r•{ 3�,.. - I� '£ d �, ��' � '�� t �F.SW �, n(.ea a:"�.. �( � � � 9�q� �v.3 li, w,., #; I� aIn «j 'ET �C•^!l R%� _ '® iiF:� ,1 ;of ?Sglected' Z 't` ► ,, � $� I#, ,l,i � X p� `I7',f!>ip',•,..-.,.'r. ,,,s.. x'w�►Ca'r,'?%• :r3,.,w B96AI384 AGGESSf ACCE55 A ; 9601 Building Residenti I EXPIRED LOT 10 BLK 2 AKERS FARMS19960503. 19960712 € .............................................,...._......................._............................._.._......................................................................_..................................................................................jj..._.............................., .-,.,.......2DIMPFIRESt A03PMp35 2030 Administrative Servi PENDIN NGY SHORT PLAT PRE AP •:200305281 3B03M0225 ' A = 2030 Permit Re ISSUED NGYADDITION (mach incq_ 20030207I 2(3030303�200idZ0 20EI ; 803M1803 1 ADDIMP REST A ,Buildin 12030 Buildin Permit Re ISSUED 120030911 1 20031031 i20031031 201� �� Tt 1 r� •YF •i���,.,4, e'��•"� 'i. �' �A=-,'�i11�!g�`s.'7711'�7'-. ,�.;1�. '. f:: 4 ,{^, p.� i`t�e`r ro; r , .ter FI"a_= i "' 1 _.�i�� $f C�i ' L it L InbO f 1�rtOsgFt a GCEJ ]IJ Base Cr " 'FER.f IIT_' ��I I Y 11 ?i.s�.�'yr,%1?P•��n�Jkl?' . Friday, Dec 05, 2003 10:03 AM \ I I III 1 1 E{ �{ l I �� Y 4 \t 1 7f lf7 \ 1. I ' i ; i ; II l y 3f.1 it w is: }lµ'jii 1 4 \Illlikll It f l f l I I I I I l y 1 i r j vr'•79� 1 \�J // I I zags• i I j i ! I ! rra•rrl 1f r� 05 1 1 1 tJIItlllltll;l, l f l l{ E I f} f 1 j t f I R'as , r Lcy s c�sp:1 1 1 ! IIIIFI1lItktllt I I f I! j } 11 1t� t ilk 1 l 1 1 ! J !f I Jf jl l\ 1 rn o•� ' j ''r .'r �i 3FIIIiIllliljlll } 1 r f j!} i { 1 4 t\ .eat: w`ry i l l l i l l r l l f l I i 1 i JI 1! f t 1 I E I I t j I I j I l l l l! I I 11! I r I 5l _ zai \I I ;\`^` If it 1!*!♦ 1 j \ t f t.;"�;Y `\ �♦ u:val 1 n 11 1 iIr 11 55 t\ \\ t5 f 1 as It \ j 1\ ,;, ! [vwsy ! ♦�♦�. _ rrr11%\�_` tr I {1 \ � l . ♦ 1 \I \``` ��ti ``\`\`�"♦\N♦\tlh 1�`� t ♦ � �\.\♦1 1 F ] i rys•''4y 1 .q.� Su nY/ I /, / c r7l — \ 5 \ ! l S i 1 \ —1 t 1 5 4 1 1,y ; •1hV\ l i h 1 \♦.uu.yy�11�\\ 1 .k \ l I ` / // �` / t f ,r.B 1 i\ 4. y 1 `q\ IIb1151 ( \ l 1 11 / f l 1 l t 11 ft l l \131t h111 \ q>?nl1 ;Jlx:- 5 I I / J I l S Il ti\tI`ly1tj11Y` t 1 i t i 1Y �'L11\ I \ Cam,' tl7y ! 1 f ! 1 l 4 I 1 11 1 T 111 Ott\I; �\\\11 \t t W t1 tt C7 I 1 f 1 I It 5 y I I S t S f} r1155t115\1 ii T•FS Y I I I ;:'rn 1 I t Sl I 1 111tt 11\It tIS1 S11 I1 I I Ifni l \ ♦� \\ \\ \\ It 1 Iri 1:7s, , f l I 1 I, l 3 l \\ 1 11 l l 1 l it k l l{ 1 I !Jilt\ 1\ \\ \ \ • `♦ \\'•,:>>S S 1 / ♦ds/l .'T�:CI f s'iJi 11 r :� ., ! i f II F I \ t I I 1 5 t f! l i 11 1! 1 f/i •y.5— i 4! 1\ V\ \\ \\ \\ `♦ \` \\ \1 S I J / ! :i l I// v_�'/ 'Ji J J I i 1 l i i i I f (—���/ 5\\ \ \ t � ♦1 t 1 /, \\, in .:. y,s ;;:: J: • / rl / r rr` / ///! 1 I f r fr! f (!J If (11! 15 11 \\\♦ f f ! \ \ \\ ty \\ �\ 1 t\ Y l ! f 1 I ! ! 1 01 tlt�..�_� —� _� \�\ \\ f 1 11 \\ a41 �.�' ` , t 11 \\t♦\ \ 1 r, a �,�'�__ ! �' JJI ! ! J! 1 1 / h •t,t S}S _ _— r ` . 1 `�♦11jj \\ q.'i.l `I \\ — r r;: i:;/ ! 4 \ `♦♦It1 Syr +I/ \� `l Ly Y)l I rl/I �i /� f'1 1 ` 1 J r♦ 1 ! ! t x _ ( ,i 1! I i ( I l 1 _ l I l l 11 :.: L.s. \ . \ \� �'`•"ti _ l t Y l 1 J` � r / / 1 1 Y ! / I ��\ / t I `�♦ I \ t I + I Y 1 1 I I l i f l l f i '// i fJ I+ I t I It ~\ It ^ l: y:'9'}; t i\\1 11\\ \♦ l* 5 J I � � � 4 1 l I� S I i tl 4 1\♦ 't\ \\t \� ``,\ f i ... { ♦ :r: ,':: _ CL';c: 1 5t 1t 1 1 \ \ \\1{�1 �JI 1 j I f S 1 11 � tl y I tS \ `\ 1 5t i � �'\ r°? � t` It S i 1 i \ 1"•� \�t284 '\ t �\1 "'.'\ l °"'� 's t' 1 ♦ 1 1 1 �11�1/J/I� 111 t 11 l kt II 11 I 1 1 I{ I i It l S 1 +�� �— \\\ \♦ f I S t i JJlJr � Ir j�!! I � i 1 tt f I I I I j I r f �\ \♦.,, `,1�`'\l 1 SI \`"^s:4•�s ` a tt t f \Y I l i J'� r 1 1 1! 1 r I 1 11 1 h l S j I 1 l\ \t �\ `t k\ \� ♦ }Ju"� _ y 1 } I !!/ ! 1 1 1 1 S S 1 1 1 I. I \\ St 1 5\ \1 ♦ \ er I t } 1 i_i. tlIt ! 1 t 1 h 1 \1 \ \\ \1 ! I l l Il{ •. 5� i f r t k l ! l 4 I I S l l 1 1 1 1 \ ;.a \tll j!!! 1FI+ V lj If1 j1 f t 1 f 1 S 1 1 I I �J S; V t I. F! l 1 l S 4 y 1 IIj135, it ES Stt /(! i 1 S l t\ 1 I I I I 11 If l l 1 1j r 1 1 J f V\ \ f\ L 1 \ l It 1 It 1 1 t ' \5 Il \t \t `y 1t It tt 1 S\ ` It 1 t`\ \♦ 1:;sa i�� `�� _ lt1 4 Ill1 I I 1 1 1 1 ! � S t \ l 1 l \\ ♦ \ 5 \\ t\ `♦ l\ i ` 1\ l IFI I tl k 1 ( l ? �/ I \\ �� ♦ `\ vG ,3.•} t�� ^\_ SI�a} r "liiilllll + 1 ! k!r ! \•_ . JII�• n. Mils^\I y*�= L-17,TI.�T: \ .5 \♦ I I yl11 l t♦ f Q \\lstkl { 5 Y fJ !\ ` Vll yllt tt , S I I,,. ;t i l l ! It , , I f ! _ 1j � � s li j 5l1 y 1 lV e.l.; y1t\\\♦ 1V \ Il i I l .9'x5 CD M1 -�cl I — it _ [ ! f \ ♦� �\ 1 •, t t t 5 1 1 ! : k ! I Q 1 V = 1 �1l l I, 1 0 1 -{'c I 1 t I111 1 1 S 1 1 f ! ( f I! I (��♦�. \\tit hS k 11Y1 k kl , I+ t \ j \ \ < t \\ _ � 1� t \�'iti� l - � \ F ;1 {17� ♦ ♦ 1 llll h Yh}kl S I `♦ \ \ t l } :a'i:•., 1 S \ tt •, �\ � 1 t cs s: 7l!I "5�_� � 1 4 111 l 1 i 41 5 l \ ♦ 1 1 l h 1 "N•7: � <.'r':, \\ l lt1 f l s 1 5 4 1 tl t\ \ 5 1I *-:''4.: • ff \ , r ( F / 1 • \ 1 I4 k 5 tI 11 \ \ \ 1 h 1 \ 1 I �... I I I I 1 4 + t 1 ! I it I ��\ t! ` r \ / ^ \ `I fir i i 1 r/ice`i'• �_ ij//� . Se t\\\t \ I I r / / { r f`L 1 \ , �'� It l I it i 1 1 1 4 1 ill ,� y�,� ` i\`�\ �����♦ ttl ♦..\ tlttll f 1 1 \_ 1„1, — \'*`\.♦ �;:\\j155t 1\\.illy!! 1 I IfJ / \ \ \♦ \\\t 5 f > // / ♦ \t t, \ I l 1\I\555 5 5\l \\ ! 1N 1 \l yl l 115I\tt\Ill! 1 I ! !!J/! 1 ic,.5. ^i\1�k qt l ItSl�Sl t\ltltllVV It�j4 + I i11 l ey 1 4 f ! f l !f!1 I r 141 111Y1 1 1 .1 \1µ151 !' t ••rc ' I \ 4 1 _151it \tSSStI t I\\\\\ V ! 1 J ct 1 t J f J! �``\t r 1 1145 t1 t1lit StV tt' t t 11 ♦ t 1 1 IIYI tS \l\ISl1{111111 4 I15S5 ti \\tVtt\\1t\\4'tt SyV l t `� r \ a s'" ♦♦ \ 4 ' aCs: f l♦ ♦ 1 \\\ t �` \.���� 1t I1S111 t\1 11t` 5ti 5111 \ y` �.-c .. Yr`�� +•:.c `� I ti — �� �� ♦ l i \ � l 1 \1 �1lS Sty lI l — Z:. „•. 1 ! 1 \ — ` lt}lltt{tt 11 Y5411Yt; tt\1tt t\ �� rf - t \\t\` —_"'1 ` \t SItit51tt1 ttyttl`Yi\SS ��SSS55 IMI ; ' 'tr `i'} r' n,:r'•-r'----, r� l \ \♦ ' 1tj15514 11155115t 11 ` 5\t 51 tt11\\ t\tl 1 t k l S Stlff,,l��1\ t\ \ ~t „Z: lit r• I 4 S 1 tSlt4 4 1` :>7 \Il1Yl4k1Il I 1 -' — ri� 1 1 4i•r: I ySl ;n jy1l 1 '' I111141\ 11q:•±c Slf 1 I tt1t1\\ti��1 \5 t - \ l�-. ` � \ ♦ � � �. � � I l �"+ C f 4 �i�,\1 It , y S \tSV l h l 1 S k f tlll}111_ 1.,.c ~r 1 1 1 lttl`ttt� 1111.t'\511t 1\\jyt\ \ 51I�1 C3 ;1 � i Il�\tPt1t }1151k;t \`41tit11 `il `\ // l 1 I lhl l 1 5 tt fsttllt '�ti it 4 S 5t ttl{t t\ll t \t\ -\ I I 't I V Ilj 4f 1 t 51klStIYl V%tt5 \ I\\\I1\\ V\ 1 rt 1\I l ih;'' I � / 14 13 1111 tI ll \tilt _ j J I I t ;III IY1SshI1 Sl1 CAI, 0, t5 lit tt 1 1 '^ _ I+r .� _. 1S ki l44 h Sttlht \tytl tttl! VIt\tl '�•`♦ k !I 1 1 j �\ ltl jl lYli t511111YV r7'\ 1\tt}V\�tSS 5l \1 \.'.: �••� L yil., 1(T1�Jj (1T� V St llltth tlklf 11 !\ \1\t\\t ♦ ♦ \ � :r a= .•;" ; .t-„y (J/Jii I }}t / r / r �, I It Ill�ll�yt�lt,t al,tltt � \ 1 ! {,'•!r 1 l r I/ !r I It tll h l 5t't 1 - ,,. _ (`r '•t I jfll \ 1 I t ti 1J \ 1 L I ♦�.? I 1 l t } 11 ) 1 lS 1111S 1iS 15 .\\1\\\1 ! J•/ x I \ \h f / f I I i5 I I 1 f l ! �" l / { } t V tl Ili! \ \ - \ ! \ I I I 4 .I 1 I ♦4\ �r? \ 5 t f IIy154 I lS 1 { 1\1\\Sit \�\♦y]J r r ^ II 1%I'V t tl l tt tt\ 1S 1✓ ��5 I- f \ t L I I t t { � II Itt\\tll y \\ \h5 t1 ♦ ! I j l l 5 t S l 1 I111 (:f. 5j llyl i tt,+I 5 \1�1ttt\1! ♦ y I 1 1 t { ! i I l l� k 15141f/1J 11 t t 1\1 t1\l1Vl\\♦y ��aLt `� :':'z_:I f \♦♦ �—tom— � ��/ Y a 1 l��i Y 1 1• Pre -Application Check List (En ing eerin Issues) Updated: October 2, 1998 Roads (1993_KCRS): 16 Av6 s� V Road classification abutting property, KCRS 2.02, 2.03 ►�' Type of frontage improvements, KCRS 1.03, 2.02, 2.03 a On -site access to all Into Y(drivewa J oint-use-drwa iveor road) Y Off-site improvements, KCRS 1.03 ? Enter sight distance, KCRS 2.13 V Stopping sight distance, KCRS 2.12 15 0 _ Cul-de-sac bulb, KCRS 2.08 G Minimum pavement width, KCRS 2.02, 2.03 T Minimum right-of-way or private tract width, KCRS 2.02, 2.03, 2.09, 3.01 Public vs. private road requirement, KCRS 2.06.B.7 Intersection spacing, KCRS 2.10.B�j�T - - - - - �Z5 _ Intersection angle, KCRS 2.10 _ Minimum radii, KCRS 2.10 or _ Landing requirements, KCRS 2.10.0 Maximum T I road grades, KCRS 2.02, 2.03, 2.11 m �s Access and circulation (100-lot max.), KCRS 2.20, Separate walkways, bikeways, and trails, KCRS 3.08 lr Roadside obstacles, KCRS 5.11 1r Road variance procedure, KCRS 1.08 Drainage (1998 SWDAD: Determine if drainage review is required, is so, which of four type Contributing off -site flows onto property Downstream conveyance to acceptable system-� Drainage easements Runoff control, retention/detention Water quality requirement Community plan drainage requirements Basin plan drainage requirements P-suffix drainage requirements 100-year floodplain analysis Existing drainage problems Miscellaneous: Eagle habitat _ Fire Marshall requirements Existing wells _ Moratoriums Adverse neighbor concerns _ Violations Min. lot size for wells — Tracts segregate parcels? Sign. Trees _ Shoreline Geo. Study Wet. Study K I -N C C 0 U N T Y :1 " K N G C, 0 U N F Y k WA' y�. .gj ............... ..... ... .............. . ................ .... ....... ... ...... .. . ....................... ................ ........... :.l.: . .... . . ... .......... ........... K I N G c 0 u rl' T Y. in It r- I I'M Lx.qkN—kVW---J qb .. . ... .... owl. zi. . ...... 727. maps;:-. SIM, gay.:. s K I N G C O U N T Y BDOC ACCOUNT: 008700-0133-0 TAXPAYER: NGY TENG LOT: 10 BLK: 2 KING COUNTY DEPT OF ASSESSMENTS BDO1 PAI11270-51 REAL PROPERTY HISTORY 09/18/03 11:38:58.1 SITUS: 17003 105TH AV SE 98055 QSTR: SW 29 23 05 PLAT: AKERS FARMS NO. 05 * A S S E S S E D V A L U E H I S T O R Y YEAR LAND IMPS DATE REASON 04 61,000 116,000 07/03 REVALUE 03 59,000 108,000 09/02 REVALUE 03 57,000 100,000 04/02 SR CIT CHANGE 02 57,000 100,000 04/02 SR CIT CHANGE 02 28,000 50,600 07/01 REVALUE 01 28,000 50,600 05/00 REVALUE 00 28,000 50,600 08/99 REVALUE 99 28,000 50,600 10/98 REVALUE 99 40,000 50,000 04/98 EXTENSION 98 28,000 50,600 11/97 S.C. FROZEN V 98 40,000 50,000 09/97 REVALUE * * * CONTINUED CHOOSE ONE OPTION: PRESS <PRINT> TO PRINT SCREEN, <PF2> FOR CHARACTERISTICS, <PF4> FOR LEGAL, <PF' JTUTRS : KING CO * S A L E S H I S T O R Y DATE SALES PRICE REMARKS 03/02 145,000 DEED * END OF SALES HISTORY 0.6) <ENTER> FOR MORE HISTORY, i> FOR TAXES OR <PF8> TO END. BDOC KING COUNTY DEPT OF ASSESSMENTS BD01 PAII1260-S1 REAL PROPERTY CHARACTERISTICS 09/18/03 11:36:29.4 ACCOUNT: 008700-0133-0 SITUS: 17003 105TH AV SE 98055 TAXPAYER: NGY TENG QSTR: SW 29 23 05 LOT: 10 BLK: 2 PLAT: AKERS FARMS NO. 05 JURS: KING CO * L A N D D A T A * j** B U I L D I N G D A T A ** BLDG 1 OF 1 ZONE ACTUAL BLDG SQ FOOTAGE DATA MISC BLDG INFO JURISDICTION KING CO FIRST FLOOR 850 YEAR BUILT 1948 SQUARE FEET 17935 + 1/2 FLOOR #STORIES 1.0 WATER SYSTEM WTR DIST ' 2ND FLOOR #LIVING UNITS 1 SEWER PRIVATE i UPPER FLOOR DAYLIGHT BSMT VIEW NO TOTAL BSMT HEAT SOURCE GAS OPEN SPACE FIN BSMT HEAT SYSTEM FLR-WAL BSMT GARAGE ACCESSORY IMPS TIDELANDS , TOTAL LIVING AREA 850 POOL AREA WATERFRONT FEET I ATTACHED GARAGE POOL CONSTR WFT LOCATION I DET GARAGE AREA WFT BANK I ROOMS CARPORT AREA WFT RIGHTS ONLY I BEDROOMS 2 MOBILE HOME 0.2) CHOOSE ONE OPTION: PRESS <PRINT> TO PRINT SCREEN, <PF4> FOR LEGAL, <PFG> FOR HISTORY, <PF7> FOR TAXES OR <PF8> TO END. 5 J6 f ol ar' r er. %,11 f!p, ip �0 f7 d ILI 'AR9 'C tk f 11mai "Dirs IN N b,,,,,% A, -Y�60�( Ofi*, mb p,yvibn, bd' ;'It" 'j ot'. 41 rox �W- V, Arei, 17.9 3E5-0:0 Av,;IA 0.41 li L:1Aq YwAr P R-8 �r-�d�41"Hm'���„`I'�f'�i1 117003 10 TH AVE SE "Til I, lilt 4�f NL. , ZA. DONALDSON JAMES S 17003 1 05T H AVE SE Ir"41 I"' . .... ............ rAdd;eU,,3-,t 9805 Aa 'T Thdhd 2� V-1 0*1 5 ,ff: Wi �Pl se,Vbddj Vol" XiiCT IVE Lid Thursday, Sep 18, 2003 11:35 AM King County - DDES r r W 2— 4 - %Npf,� I Pjr, Pf ic. awn 008700-0133 B03MO225 JADDIMPFIRESI ]A 102/07/2003 1 ISSUED INGYTENG 008700-0133. B03MI803 JADDIMPFIRESI A 109)11/2003 1 PENDING I NGY TEND & MORANY 008700.0133 B96A1384 IACCESSFIACCESSRY I A 105Y03/1996 1 EXPIRED I NESS, JOHN Sleled P6rol Pters, Record: 1 of 4 'hack S tbo°'.o -Til 1, 1 fir,: - v - —T —4 VYgfrit . V, , .1� 0 - , . , , , ir"07'diipA 'Jn All X ;4; 'h J, . ...... 08700-013 Activity rlFtN4 A. 0 '0.4Set Add(0si,-At6chments,. J, LL4 4D, lis@66t,llu 7 Thursday, Sep 18, 2003 11:35 AM King County - DDES t l"1 . .i'', , ' dt il1OU1 " A ,- ""�A A )P4f4110.0 i. 4;A10rt IMt4piP ,1,C 1I 11,Cxi It"!4� Balk ? , j" &I,A, t-In d1JP 4 Paidol'NUmbeT vo" a 1# IA,A '4t ':fth f4wo Addfbii,'#, N, 061 17003105TH AVE SE jurisdicti c V1,111. U 71's 7F 7-70, TarOW`-ll,@�a n1pre 11 /24/1998 te E 'Y P, DON"' D Nj W, pejs Name AL S A A)"e, "t"i Ole q. :Aq. �j, �J.` J4 'Ot 4 ht 16fdb6ti6n>>>>> ck<Do 10 lion" 'o, jit, :',14 A, 4004 il�� A;.; CSNA -23-05 R -8-S 0 AKE R S FAR M S N 0. 05 0 w .4111, !�yll' A. wr it W1, o. 10 i. Blk Nb.; 2 n1hg E I 4P1 P i POP' ffective Date:1V 0.41 -Sq.. Ft. 17,935 , 4�:Y#� , -, - " "I A to wl! l,)� ... .. ... r , 1 1 , �,j A -i 10"A 77 7"PT, Ali d - - , , E. ;J, � 4 , Lan We, 0 e, 601 Lan, III :Jj�Ap,;T.iL j1 334 Plant um 040/027 'CumixichurINIV14 •ti07 0"—, 1 1 1 vWq -, `14A J 4 81; IMP �oos Cjre� 403 (Renton) Comi�uqj y, an , :. 'a I . V'�rR '9 41! � iM"', 'RY fire biitrldit,"� 40 P Ail. A lq Wbter Ristuct' POU16"S"dwer, vai rr L. �,` Soos Creek A 12 w 901,11; Soos Ueek 'vIa ?S ve , �.- I" . q to' 4 "0 it ( t A: w) n41 . ;41 AII ,,Pf, " 0I j A I R", Ei A, 1 14 11 o Y11 4, Thursday, Sep 18, 2003 11:35 AM King County - DDES BDOC KING COUNTY DEPT OF ASSESSMENTS REAL PROPERTY LEGAL DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT: 008700-0133-0 SITUS: 17003 105TH AV SE 98055 TAXPAYER: NGY TENG LEGAL DESCRIPTION - PAGE 1 LOT 10 BLOCK 2 PLAT: AKERS FARMS NO. 05 AKERS FARMS # 5 E 1/2 BDO1 PA111280-S1 09/18/03 11:38:34.7 QSTR: SW 29 23 05 JURS: KING CO * END OF LEGAL DESCRIPTION * I 0.1) CHOOSE ONE OPTION: PRESS <PRINT> TO PRINT SCREEN, <ENTER> FOR MORE LEGALS, <PF2> FOR CHARACTERISTICS, <PF6> FOR HISTORY, <PF7> FOR TAKES OR <PF8> TO END. BDOC ACCOUNT: 008700-0133-0 TAXPAYER: NGY TENG LOT: 10 BLK: 2 * A S S E S S E D YEAR 97 LAND 28,000 97 28,000 95 28,000 93 32,700 91 30,000 89 89 23,900 87 22,500 85 21,000 83 21,000 KING COUNTY DEPT OF ASSESSMENTS BDOI PAI11270-S1 REAL PROPERTY HISTORY 09/18/03 11:39:03.2 SITUS: 17003 105TH AV SE 98055 QSTR: SW 29 23 05 PLAT: AVERS FARMS NO. 05 JURS: KING CO V A L U E H I S T O R Y *'* S A L E S H I S T O R Y IMPS DATE REASON DATE SALES PRICE REMARKS 50,600 11/96 S.C. FROZEN V ` 03/02 145,000 DEED 50,600 09/96 REVALUE 50,600 10/94 REVALUE 41,600 03/92 REVALUE 38,200.07/90 REVALUE j 02/88 LEVY CODE CHN 23,200 01/88 REVALUE 18,.600 07/86 REVALUE 19,200 04/84 REVALUE 19,200 05/82 REVALUE * END OF VALUE HISTORY * * END OF SALES HISTORY ( 5.7) CHOOSE ONE OPTION: PRESS <PRINT> TO PRINT SCREEN, * GPF2> FOR CHARACTERISTICS, [PF4> FOR LEGAL, <PF7> FOR TAXES OR ¢PF8> TO END. SOC Page 1 of 1 King County s1111111111 Inz!' _ i 1 Parcel Number: 0087000133 Listed below are both Post -Conversion and Pre -Conversion development conditions which are associated with the parcel you entered. To view text for a development condition, choose a condition code in either box below and click on a Get Text button. Otherwise click on 'New Quey at the bottom of this page to perform another parcel search. Post -Conversion Conditions (Effective August 18, 1997) KCC-16.82.150D SC-P3 SO-220 Pre -Conversion Conditions (Prior to August 18, 1997) SCP-P3 SCP-P7 �a�Gek,'�Text �r� r` a L',qp 1i., r^I %�'s',rrloriirier'inliycllsplay Ii, �r Updated: December 29, 1998 King County I DDES Page f DDESIGIS Page I New Querx I News I Services I Comments Search Links to external sites do not constitute endorsements by King County. By visiting this and other King County web pages, you expressly agree to be bound by terms and conditions of the site. The details. Parcel Number: 0087000133 Taxpayer: NGY TENG Annexation: NIA Jurisdiction: Unincorporated King County Situs Address: 17003105TH AVE SE Postal City: Renton, 98055 Plat Name: AKERS FARMS NO.05; Rec: nil Lot: 10; Block: 2 Kroll Page: 601 W Thomas Bros. Page: 656 114-S-T-R: SW-29-23-5 Acres: 0.41 (17935 SgFt.) Current Zoning: R-B-SO Potential Zoning: Camp. Plan Land Use: um Assessor's Open Space: NIA Commercial Use: NIA Number of Units: NIA Mobile Home: N Land Value: 59000 Improvements Value: 108000 Community Plan Area: Soos Creek Unincorporated Area Council: NIA School District: Renton School District 403 Fire District: 40 Roads MPS Zone: 334 ($1770.00) Waterfront: Water Service: Water Service Planning Area: Soos Creek Water And Sewer District Sewer Service: Airport Noise Remedy Program: NIA Bald We Flag: WA Council District (1996-2001): 6 Rob McKenna (R) Council District (2002): 5 Dwight Pelz Drainage Basin: Black River, WRIA 9 Police: King County, Pct: 3, Dist: F3 Service/Finance Strategy Area: Full Service wfrransit Priority Snowload Zone: Standard Agricultural Production District: N Forest Production District: N Rural Forest Focus Area: N TDR Type: WA TDR Status: NIA TDR Permit Number: NIA Building Inspection Area: Cleo Rubalcaba Clearing Inspection Area: Jim Ballweber Code Enforcement Inspection Area: DenoBe Olegba ESA Inspection Area: Kathy Newborn Grading Inspection Area: Ramon Locsin Land Use Inspection Area: Jae Huh Sens. Areas Notice(s) on Title: L03SO031 Curt Foster DDES/LUSD Engineering Review Section MS OAK-DE-0100 OFFICE OF THE HEARING EXAMINER KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON 400 Yesler Way, Room 404 Seattle, Washington 98104 Telephone (206) 2964660 Facsimile (206) 296-1654 REPORT AND DECISION September 17, 2004 SUBJECT: Department of Development and Environmental Services File No. L03SO031 NGY SHORT PLAT Short Plat Appeal Location: 17003 — 105th Avenue Southeast Appellants: Tim McCannon & Bonnie Bottesch 17007 — 105th Place Southeast Renton, Washington 98055 Telephone: (425) 277=9569 Applicant: Teng Ngy represented by Mark Olson Cornerstone Engineering 1000 Denny Way, #800 Seattle, WA 98109 Telephone: (206) 250-7306 Facsimile. (206) 494-9460 King County: Department of Development and Environmental Services represented by Fereshteh Dehkordi and Curt Foster 900 Oakesdale Avenue Southwest Renton, Washington 98055 Telephone: (206) 296-7173 and 296-7106 Facsimile: (206) 296-7051 SUMMARY OF DECISION/RECOMMENDATION: Department's Preliminary Recommendation: Department's Final Recommendation: Examiner's Decision: Deny appeal Deny appeal Appeal denied 03SO031 — Ngy Short Plat EXAMINER PROCEEDINGS: Hearing Opened: Hearing Closed: 1 Page 2 of 5 September 15, 2004 September 15, 2004 Participants at the public hearing and the exhibits offered and entered are listed in the attached minutes. A verbatim recording of the hearing is available in the office of the King County Hearing Examiner. FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS & DECISION: Having reviewed the record in this matter, the Examiner now makes and enters the following: FINDINGS: On June 18, 2004, the King County Department of Development and Environmental Services issued a preliminary approval to Teng Ngy to short plat .41 acres in the R-8 zone into three lots for a single-family residential development. The property located at 17003 — 105th Avenue Southeast currently contains an existing residence that is being remodeled under a separate building permit. The three lots are proposed to be accessed from 105th Avenue Southeast via a common private driveway. The preliminary approval requires the Applicant to obtain a drainage adjustment to pump runoff uphill from the lots to a ditch that runs along 105th Avenue Southeast. A timely appeal of the short plat approval was filed by Tim McCannon and Bonnie Bottesch, representing themselves and other neighborhood residents. A pre -hearing conference on the appeal was held by the King County Hearing Examiner's Office on August 19, 2004, and a pre - hearing order was issued on August 20, 2004. The appeal issues identified within the pre- heating order concern the potential for failure within the Applicant's proposed drainage pump system, the allegation that the proposed short plat violates density and lot area requirements, and questions concerning the consistency of a street tree requirement with the installation of utility facilities and the adequacy of off-street parking for the lots. Certain other issues raised by the Appellants appeared to be more related to perceptions regarding the sloppiness of the work being done by the Applicant pursuant to his building permit for remodeling the existing residence, and DDES staff was requested to facilitate site inspections with respect to such issues. A summary of these inspection activities appears in the record as exhibit 9. 3. The DDES supplemental staff report (exhibit 4), as elaborated at the public hearing by the staff testimony, is responsive to the appeal issues. As indicated by staff, the drainage adjustment required of the Applicant for diversion of site runoff uphill to 105th Avenue Southeast will implement Surface Water Design manual requirements for dual alternating pumps, an alarm system for pump failure, and possibly a requirement for extra sump capacity sufficient to retain drainage flows when there is a temporary electrical power outage. These measures all need to be adequately described and documented by the Applicant prior to final engineering approval. In like manner, street trees to be planted on the site must be derived from an approved list of landscaping vegetation that has been selected for compatibility with utility development, and the Applicant will need to provide two off-street parking spaces on each lot consistent with code requirements. If L03SO031 — Ngy Short Plat Page 3 of 5 4. The record also demonstrates that the short plat application meets existing zoning code requirements for density within the R-8 zone. Based on a parcel size of approximately 18,000 square feet and no deduction for submerged lands, the property supports development at approximately 3.3 units, thus warranting a three -lot plat with some square footage to spare. The only contention raised by the Appellants that the staff report does not discuss in detail is the suggestion that proposed lot no. 3 at 3,410 square feet may be undersized. Because the zoning code now regulates development on the basis of overall density rather than minimum lot size, only minimal dimensional requirements must be met. KCC 21 A.12.030 requires that any new lot created have a minimum width of at least 30 feet, and KCC 21A.12.100 mandates in urban residential zones a minimum lot area of 2500 square feet. All lots within the proposed short plat meet these minimum dimensional requirements. 6. Finally, while staff has no authority to impose upon an applicant development requirements in excess of those contained in County regulations, one nonetheless observes that the Ngy Short Plat is not as radical a departure from existing neighborhood patterns as argued by the Appellants. On the block bounded by 105th Avenue Southeast on the east and 104th Avenue Southeast on the west, and lying between Southeast 166th Street and SR 515, there appear currently to be 11 parcels (including the subject application) containing between 16,000 and 18,000 square feet. There are, however, another 18 lots that are half this size due to prior short platting activity. Thus the net effect of the current short plat application under R-8 zoning will be to create 3 lots on 18,000 square feet, instead of 2 lots within the same area as was permitted by prior zoning. CONCLUSIONS: The Appellants have not met their burden of proof to demonstrate that the preliminary approval conferred by DDES on June 18, 2004, for the Ngy ShortPlat violated county platting or zoning requirements. The appeal therefore must be denied. DECISION: The appeal is DENIED. ORDERED this 17th day of September, 2{ King County Hearing Examiner L03SO031 — Ngy Short Plat Page 4 of 5 TRANSMITTED this 17th day of September, 2004, to the parties and interested persons of record: Christopher & Michele Binkley 17032 - 104th Ave. SE Renton WA 98055 Heath & Miyumi Conner 17010 - 104th Ave. SE Renton WA 98055 Jeff & Lynn Howard 17014 - 104th Ave. Se Renton WA 98055 Rebecca Lind City of Renton, EDNSP 1055 S. Grady Way Renton WA 98056 Reggie Newman 17013 - 105th Ave. SE Renton WA 98055 Jay Seo Cornerstone Engineering 1000 Denny Way, #800 Seattle WA 98109 David & Wendy Yadock 17020 - 104th Ave. SE Renton WA 98055 Lisa Dinsmore DDES/LUSD MS OAK-DE-0100 Carol Rogers DDES/LUSD MS OAK-DE-0100 1-lank & Eulaine Blumenthal 16830 - 105th Ave. SE Renton WA 98055 Cornerstone Engineering Mark Olson 1000 Denny Way, #800 Seattle WA 98109 Anthony & Patricia Juarez 16663 - 105th Ave. SE Renton WA 98055 Javier & Lymara Casio 17031 - 105th Ave. SE Renton WA 98055 Barry Crampton 16820 - 105th Ave. SE Renton WA 98055 Margaret King 16829 - 105th Ave. SE Renton WA 98055 Bonnie Bottesch & Tim McCannon Robert & Marjorie Midgett 17007 - 105th Ave. SE 17012 - 105th Ave. SE Renton WA 98055 Renton WA 98055 Teng Nyg 5563 - 156th Ave. SE Bellevue WA 98006 Darren & Bonnie Sweaney 17004 - 105th Ave. SE Renton WA 98055 Mark Bergam DDES/LUSD Engineering Review MS OAK-DE-0100 Curt Foster DDES/LUSD Engineering Review Section MS OAK-DE-0100 Eugene Riske 16821 - 105th Ave. SE Renton WA 98055 Tom Touma Touma Engineers 6632 S 191 st P1, #E-102 Kent WA 98032 Fereshteh Dehkordi DDES/LUSD Current Planning MS OAK-DE-0100 Rich Hudson DDES/LUSD Current Planning MS OAK-DE-0100 103S0031 — N'gy short Plat NOTICE OF RIGHT TO APPEAL Page 5 of 5 The action of the hearing examiner on this matter shall be final and conclusive unless a proceeding for review pursuant to the Land Use Petition Act is commenced by filing a land use petition in the Superior Court for King County and serving all necessary parties within twenty-one (21) days of the issuance of this decision. The Land Use Petition Act defines the date on which a land use decision is issued by the Hearing Examiner as three days after a written decision is mailed. MINUTES OF THE SEPEMBER 15, 2004, PUBLIC HEARING ON DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT AND ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES FILE NO. L03SO031. Stafford L. Smith was the Hearing Examiner in this matter. Participating in the hearing were Fereshteh Dehkordi, Mark Bergam and Curt Foster, representing the Department; Tim McCannon, Bonnie Bottesch, the Appellants; Mark Olson, representing the Applicant and Jeff Howard. The following Exhibits were offered and entered into the record: Exhibit No. I DDES File Nos. L03S0031 & L04APO10 Exhibit No. 2 Preliminary approval letter, dated June 18, 2004 Exhibit No. 3 Application received November 14, 2003 Exhibit No. 4 DDES staff report for September 15, 2004, appeal hearing Exhibit No. 5 Site Plan received November 14, 2003 Exhibit No. 6 Field Report dated January 8, 2003 Exhibit No. 7 Level One Drainage Report dated November 13, 2003 Exhibit No. 8 Appeal Statement received July 12, 2004 Exhibit No. 9 Memo from Fereshteh Dehkordi to Stafford Smith dated September 2, 2004 SLS:ms L03SO031 RPT A14 !lF�iJ�'d� i��1 ,1`� i � i�R�sT s' zn" fa' �'tr ei�r "�� ? o v ,� ' � ° a 5 i r �l.:0 a gw4stAt�Im. rA wn, a A'a a a w BaI1rEiMIil e` � a mil'»` IMMUNE 'ii~ �ifv''�• a I. f*'" �S-iR�7EYsz3 lm Usm B 22 114 �; l ' ,. Nil' ?i�� `� _ t .�. f � � � � _ _' /i'• • S 'tarp -a'• �: ����3 � 4M/G.�iy.,+;�j�er�Cyyl��� �sm � '�+ � �� �j��1'�:'i�'��'R�@��ar�9fl0��p��y'`._1"�•O`�u"'a"�. � �...aw,'?��f�a3�•"" �� � �azi- � ;' � -,'..� � �. "�}}' .�anec�.�. _ "! _5� -- 0�� � . �•q.,�ij -�' - � � __' ••s6� �:'�----.11. =�x��.�-� -tA`:"}'� .;n Sm5. !-.'f►i?Y' F fik..be�'"- ::._,' "' xTa.a,:2 .- ' _ NO ma it Ak- A kTS� —•>fllip, R I. M I gmaibO IRS � ���� �� � _^'".,*�-. • w•,' � �• '�l� ���1+�%��''_:L.i� ...�I�-�ilnti� ��� r � II ••tea _ � ������i�i�+.'. a .�t• , 1 3.i { -- .\ � ■ •1 � fir`{�a 3'.. '�{p■'; Y Ar 7 moo/ �r r IL eoeloo" 5 1 i aw :. AL- 1 wo 0 Q U) co 9 LU U3 K z CIO Ix ui He K I N G C a U N T Y P r41ji ©-40 oKn, a ► !� i I N C, C 0 U N T Y ----------------------- oil L03SO031 NGY DRAINAGE COMPLAINTS Nrepo5 C4 zo N100 NRth and Ditch Data Bald Eagle Nasfs NTparsNp Lines 4p YJYd9Fe Network QSUES CND NTM'p' "ems $4QSV�m /%cyzs 2 n/u Io SAO wetland Co SAO Lar d 0ft JE8 SA0 Coal Mine ED SAO Selvnit: aSAO Emalon water Bodies p WLRD Dratflage Corepfatnfs oPwmh Pamela near Eaoe fi9M WDFW 1 WDFw2 DR TREESI WDFW2 OR TREES3 A(FEA A Cron Sections, 'AA FloOCiAW [� FEAA 100-yr. Fic odplaln Cities 0 100 2W 3W Feel = 300 Feet King County 1r. klarnnbn Inalehd.d on ih. mop bes bean winged by Kirp hutY hen • varlNy of soon. arrn 4 acq to rhea. mow note. Kty q., rr.14s m npaaxanbns a rrereah.., eV— a rrOW, a to t. .mrary. daepal.rom urn/kw., a Mom to th. us. d WM 4ymn.bon. KSn Cmwy &hell rat bo #able for ey wwaL aped✓✓, ON;Zr Ir m"al, a W-mir.t m drrap.a h¢Aanp. Wf not lbrWW b, bal m a Ian pohb ✓matt V Fan frw m a rria m of o. I aratbn oorhtea+sd on dNa rthap. My We dlhk meda lrlamabn m 4se map b aaf+6ked ucWt W rftQw- parmhaicn o1 Kiro cmxtY. Plot date: Dec 5, 20D3;1htlda4W 15)m11 Si ay_deOon4ec Nme2,apr l� I ' L03S0031 NGY SP 4 � # I ZONING Trails 4 ;�' , - ij Scheelsrsd+od Fadlium 1TownsNpLines S• �R C� QSUNES ; �� SECLINES TWPU�►"'P►� :SBTH• " 5E=79Tii�ST t . f �Strom NEs Vol Water Boom Road able-d-way BOTH" +j p Dance _ I j�_.rj T - �....�_`C•T_�11 � , a�$Z„a�� i��:�----x� - ----- 14to cvlltaal.one DU to acres --D,PLFord, we DU per 36 Bass RA 2Z5 - Rural Area. om DU per 5 acres " - J RA-5 - Rums Arm, one DU 5 acres i �, , • �- � f _SE:9 697" PI. SE 1.GT#1-ST RA-10 - Rural Area am DU p n acres 1 2 D•ST \ t0 a? peprer5aaes $ \ L1R -Urban Reserve, orre OU a, .- SE I R-1 - Resldartial, me acre T 1 .�1�1 - T u -r R-A - Resldentlai, 4 DU _ l¢� `' ' R-9 - Residential. a DU acre _S, - -+' a ' R-1 - Rasidential. , DU Per acre . M I n R•12 - Residenflal. 12 DU per acre f is5 — ED R-24 ,: z4 l �a� 0� .rr!- Q R48- Rmicimliai, 48 DU per acm E 9 ND ST t _e` L i NS- NeWborhood Business r - _ o ca- y �tfA C _— .1 1 pj OR80ffice Busirreas tp 5 -i I - Industrial sm�sr � � �.S■ �*moo-sr -, ivanrriea Sr = ; -�° a - f �BTH,CT'L- r T i _1:1 '�+r h r r -f �� � �� ■�` �� �ww lad ■11 MM Cara: Dec 6. 2QW: dea001UNt�pls4av_da+�Preiects4tat4e2.apr 71w,I a Ur Elu a • {! ,i79r * * k i �Afig8Cr2d7 j j f' . `w i y ry .: i• _ - `� d S ` �i :j1 I w. 4 ••• 515 ' i' ;,'�� Py, 1�u yLr,F s `•e`•r' ui •6OC • 4 J' ii610 Ur' '; c _ r .c '� ;fir -'�;•d Al ',ii "`4 ' `•�,, :..' i �,' o� �. r A M 11 TreCk .I I a'r w, _ '11$ `�-, , •` " _ _ Itiltr Ng; r< �Y' ' d 5 rvOsr--''.+a�G aw � 4 '� i �°�°',..• r, ��txsrr �;:dl�•( "�• ..�i ai'>�'��, `.. 1. ;� Py. IT i Z may- � �L �y9 - 1 k4l � id':` 1� ' W .� � �.• • f� i -'iL r� r-L • f , L;. -9 ` !.;t W {- .''�-.. 4.ri^ s p °.;• '' .Lwi.r y� �4. ,K 1� F � ray d � r�'ti , °�,. � ,� �• ,� i°,{iN0 s i �ji,,T' - _: T'R, j ��d� �r�, ' ■ gs�i '+ ,'•��^�R,.s � ;};r 4•,� .3� f• 4 •� y �' sl�Ff "� h Fi'$ � '• r1 � _ ft ` ., t' - �, ' , SOz,+, � ; " , fl'�yl �` 7 + 4�•;"Fi • si' r7'glr � ,ii� •.,¢,,;r' y;.fa•—'F=° � 4 ir':t•+�.,�: '� � ;r . T'•`` 7 <k.<. Wb s3{'d' ,fir fr;'.,Y. 'iY .M .� �P. • -� , �194 I n „ }et j'j a 3s r • a �' Y. r?,tw?. ,5s"}ia�, :±Yy.iV,�-' .a�y'Zp, _ };y,, � � �.. •'- •' , .. � � `�1 Ur'::�, I ":�x,"', c"� ,�a' I �3 •i iT. •'• e.. S. Y7 . Ng, �'-�'7ayi:�z6:,' ��- •• Br F}'e' ' > „ r ''�,.' it ��, e ' _,. � ��d ..a.�� af'. :.�; � ; .•. Wq C �c } ± k + t — T i ; • ti,.kir. wg � �. -.r t;`�. i' -�� �A �, Er r _� .: ■ t F t r'� c�, y„ f v 1 Pu•:;. 1. Ur [ riveLI •I !� • r t r'Ng fPc r �i'. 1 n .r. 1�" B,I•. N '' k 1' �, ��,- �1' .�3 f _ •,t'�.'. •Wok �. AgC S. r e .s: zrri ■ r ;eAm / �� r hi.; ¢; ,+ ,��•5 Uri (� .'^: C„"'t�,+: is • y� ' «. .•.'.'�-�' 3'` yi,r,-.�;.. ivo gq Ur 6 7 s '�.� _ _ � �•1 O •� .r..' Ur AgC hr A Ic i ¢ 4'�.Y` l myrr r AgJ rY: ,r.pu �"t , �` •cad; `'�' .' : �"•r'.•."_ ,• � ' a r - 4 . + ,` ABA; • AfY1G.'F°, 4; ' Wls•. pY n I , M'�'' eta ,q •• , .,E�s`' si � t f`• Ir Os it BYa,', : }� • d: _ - Z. . 'sz. N •`ta.' 'y.._, xe x , I I i�, ' fr. Dev. Cond. Query Result - DDES, King County Washington Page 1 of 1 III�.-iriipiiiiiiiii�i iq�pqiqiiiiirii a. Parcel Number: 0087000133 Listed below are both Post -Conversion and Pre -Conversion development conditions which are associated with the parcel you entered. To view text for a development condition, choose a condition code in either box below and click on a Get Text button. Otherwise click on 'New Query' at the bottom of this page to perform another parcel search. Post -Conversion Conditions Pre -Conversion Conditions (Effective August 18, 1997) (Prior to August 18, 1997) KCC-16.82.150D SCP-P3 SC-P3 SCP-P7 SO-220 Updated: December 29, 1998 King Counly I ODES Page I DDES/GIS Page I New Query I News [ Services I Comments Search Links to external sites do not constitute endorsements by King County. By visiting this and other King County web pages, you expressly agree to be bound by terms and conditions of the site. Thee -details, http://appsOI.metrokc.gov/www6/ddes/new—direct.cfin 12/05/2003 Parcel Number. 0087000133 Taxpayer. NGY TENG Annexation: NIA Jurisdiction: Unincorporated King County Situs Address: 17003 105TH AVE SE Postal City, Renton, 98055 Plat Name: AKERS FARMS NO. 05; Rec: nil Lot: 10; Block: 2 Kroll Page: 601 W Thomas Bros. Page: 656 1/4-S-T-R: SW-29-23-5 Acres: 0.41 (17935 SgFt.) Current Zoning: R-B-SO Potential Zoning: Comp. Plan Land Use: um Assessor's Open Space: NIA Commercial Use: N/A Number of Units: N/A Mobile Home: N Appraised Land Value: 59000 (2003). 61000 (2004) Appraised improvements Value: 108000 (2003), 116000 (2004) Community Plan Area: Soos Creek Unincorporated Area Council: N/A School District: Renton School District 403 Fire District: 40 Roads MPS Zone: 334 ($1770.00) Waterfront: Water Service: Water Service Planning Area: Soos Creek Water And Sewer District Sewer Service: Airport Noise Remedy Program: N/A Bald Eagle Flag: N/A Council District (1996-2001): 6 Rob McKenna (R) Council District (2002): 5 Dwight Pelz Drainage Basin: Black River, WRIA 9 Police: ling County, Pct.- 3, Dist: F3 Service/Finance Strategy Area: Full Service w/Transit Priority Snowload Zone: Standard Agricultural Production District: N Forest Production District: N Rural Forest Focus Area: N TDR Type: N/A TDR Status: N/A TDR Permit Number. N/A Building Inspection Area: Cleo Rubalcaba Clearing Inspection Area: Jim Ballweber Code Enforcement Inspection Area: DenoBe Olegba ESA Inspection Area: Kathy Newborn Grading inspection Area: Ramon Locsin Land Use Inspection Area: Jae Huh Sens. Areas Notice(s) on Title: BDOA KING COUNTY,DEPT OF ASSESSMENTS BD01 PA111260-S1 REAL PROPERTY CHARACTERISTICS 12/05/03 15;05:26.5 ACCOUNT: 008700-0133-0 SITUS: 17003 105TH AV SE 98055 TAXPAYER: NGY TENG QSTR: SW 29 23 05 LOT: 10 BLK; 2 PLAT: AKERS FARMS NO. 05 JURS: KING CO * L A N D D A T A * ** B U I L D I N 0 D A T A ** BLDG 1 OF 1 ZONE ACTUAL BLDG'SQ FOOTAGE DATA MISC BLDG INFO JURISDICTION KING CO FIRST FLOOR 850 YEAR BUILT 1948 SQUARE FEET 17935 1/2 FLOOR #STORIES 1.0 WATER SYSTEM WTR DIST 2ND FLOOR #LIVING UNITS 1 SEWER PRIVATE UPPER FLOOR DAYLIGHT BSMT VIEW NO I TOTAL BSMT HEAT SOURCE GAS OPEN SPACE FIN BSMT HEAT SYSTEM FLR-WAL BSMT GARAGE ACCESSORY IMPS TIDELANDS TOTAL LIVING'AREA 850 POOL AREA WATERFRONT FEET ATTACHED GARAGE POOL CONSTR WFT LOCATION DET GARAGE AREA WFT BANK ROOMS CARPORT AREA WFT RIGHTS ONLY BEDROOMS 2 MOBILE HOME 0.21 -- CHOOSE ONE OPTION: PRESS <PRINT> TO PRINT SCREEN, <PF4> FOR LEGAL, <PF6> FOR HISTORY, <PF7> FOR TAXES OR <PF8> TO END. 08I?�ECf:: L03S00_31 4 ioc tro ° SW 114 291 StottAPPLIED_ `-P tUtA�V:C� NYG, TENG to., 1ll1412003 " ISHIP 23 RANGE 5 EAST W.M. -71 ffl�Ds e.0 Statur,Gdrttpl�t caV+i Y'E E#aal� I PI fa:, NGY SHORT PLAT Des& � � � � _ � ,�� ied` 11 A 44/2003� 0, � id� a:pation` SW ll4 29 TOWNSHIP 23 RANGE 5 EAST W.M. ` .,. "el". ";17ttf: I ! Co' zip..#0; y •m.Fi s' —rn ' DONAL— ARp P - ...�,v, � � � 1a �'� . `�s ''�.d•.' .. a - � . % �f�pen �'�8$liiiY�; �! ! ' � ` � C li'..y oaii i* FDEH "rp r R a6rdeii _! ! - — fie�.�itigrs; CFOS 1_ o ;Goneple4a: _! l 4 ObcUpargy: , o Aincunt'Pai� �elar►ce•Di�,° �.i .N • - ,ta�4��tusClia�rrge. .. - + ty1y i��{` dM- DeW F., . ' •� �.; . ' j �..,� + . _ " .� {' : r - °,' e . " i '.r' ., yEtslcn•V,':�,7.2d , ._...W ':- ���' �+� .'�� . " � �:t F•.,, fir ��'low, Friday, Dec 05, 2003 03:01 PM p _ I c a �"G• _4 �``� ����— i 1 q-P is i 2 r R�Pr Rt y. I a _; g �" H, ^� 60 / m a J w II_ fro. .f p 39 I. 9 1 A - L � 'A i 1� 1 o P I� I � 1d4161 j .. 0 21Fy7 r S' ST 2 ,? to oo 11s1y p10 of °�2 '.•� .7. _ �PP 4 H ,�0 150 _ 4\;` \s ,Q;,Eb 2. 60 , � df5D2 _ a I m' I' - II Wor l � f I�, -. -- - - - - a., III 0 � 37 g 11 o 1 V a I! I _a.-� . �0 �% 1j �' 9. �a.J j jb „r t- ❑ 30 - - �jr i8 dr rII i I 140 r� 2VI si l d� !66 i _ _Jro :. 29 m l'97 W li -_ M _R2 ,1M \ C II N, I \�--- — -- 1 127.72 4071e 21 _1 \` r �40 — ••• TINY 2a /! �a: �►- �o I law �._ a1 occ v- g 7 1 � 1 rn h "� I' 150 1 - z-! 5 I �.e BOD .'163,03$ S.P 279437 . {. 20 / �, / 16 o I v3f3 _ / ��'�� 1 , �21.48 1� � '�l .I rig•• isw:lY7- 13 Y dI —_ _ IFJr�CJi� ftp�y(� f.- ►t,! 'o= ��" (9� 1 = �,. -F-� _...� ; a lld ad43'" ---- _., _ - �'•_ g . MOUE / ! r 7 ! f f i27.15.J N fgP, I / i/i ur• L� CyAQ - e I 6 100 '1 200r�gf3 l 0 04 LJ p _ 21- ©_ - 7; 2 A r 8624 ram- too �r99 a ,hack K. Eastey --`- 168TH PL. I e W * r of LLIrJ 4eg 1 a � ` .r Q $ W s+ Is �• I C ___ 300 100 I zoo — — — 7 laa.82 ri,8.ea0s fW 31 _ I rival 16E I O.t;p--���-�� _I Carr.•! cs I s; G v I Ac[- _ I CJ = 6 �L � 17.415 tt7.ars lj) .� t5a I ISO - I 4 TRAC 8a y M I C7' o I 1 0 L98S0004 > Qi o-1N. PARISI l U2S.P R577051 IN I - r,y p� j .r 'I 5i - u ss rn '." I I /7j �, I 1 J 0 I GAR 170Y5� e ^ . 475 "Cu1 _ 7E f' . 10 ,TTTfff 17 u. 2 17 R ---- 0 cr 170Q o C__ _ I I r� iy 11 2 M� (3) III----n zz III / 23!! ------Ip1� 17 4.99'AC- I 3 y3.4c.N I \ o _ '17 {rn� - v_ �_ i ,.� _- I..—] ^� 3._ p •`�C?f�r1� I) _ _ m I u+ 300 '� .rf� 60� 140 f,"a1 I - 8090 (2) r •�, Dag I I VrrG, 14 P � oo.ez ..... 5.06 AC• (I) Z48/Ic o ° �3 r�/3Cir 13 CS. - E �$ 172fV D - 30= ST.s r �3 r2 ji.. SL=n _ _ 15G ftl -- S.P. 2T5022 R 500> - APC CaR � � w __ _ .,, Il�'.t; Wiz:. •[y�J-`" ;:�,., 131 .9 IJ fi 0.2 C El r.., CAR A,' An I air` ., .. -4I e 1 I L 'pi 11 'li. i I'Sw..• JI n 0 _• 41 II i li 4' ,i L ` - 'di �'' *�9'(,. ytU?. ''.A n�qII---- � I �u1.4 ,.,. �v14o�I"-•`L'Y.55� '� (�]�Q.J� :{i f obi y 4 W (� 1 l �y � 24R `R k' J`Jl"74wY...,' 80: r 89 `" ► r4 55 APTts` 1�1 f4ti .+ : :.°' ', '2n _ -/` i � ,. Airt�'i<j�M!r• \ - � ' � •2�Aj� .r- ._w• ---"-:'mot• ::i�. �`� 'Q '-_,'' 4Att lS(3 r •�5�,•,r'. %`p'tfr 1.53 {xr =.`� i` .... kn Hery Henry 0',/{ �Ato -- - -. 'Z_, 51 :J �ND, H54 RL �-*�_' /1 �ff ! N G I r�'. *iC]. �•--.-_.. i 340.00' S 8816'46" E SE 9 i2 D STREET I `P� EX. HOUSE 'po lon► ', 10 aD i SURVEY NOTES C I INSTRUMENT: NIKON TOTAL STATION DTMAIOLG METHOD USED: FIELD TRAVERSE WITH ACTUAL FIELD MEASUREMENTS AND ANGLES 4D2' .� .—.�—.�.�:-�- p --y`� 1; 30' 1 ���, 30' WAC 332-130-090 q I I DATE: OF SURVEY: APRIL. 2003 BASIS OF BEARING: N88'03'12-E, SE 172ND STREET S FARM NO. 5 /jo�zur MH AT SE CORNERPLAT OF , OF PROPERTY BENCHMARK: SST RIM ELEV = 200.39 (SOOK CREEK) R _DEiiELOpER 7,810. sq.ft. 0.17 acres r J , - ` I TENG NGY AND MORENY NGY r I + ', I 5563 156th AVE SE ��� y I tit � I � BELLEWE, WA 9$006 �L � 425-653-3402 lam, ---__� -•` Jai G�JG `� I i E,,` � so.0o I I +t LAND SURVEYOR C N 88116 46 _ `, 3 f v I ', ! I TOOMA ENGIN EERS''& 'LAND SURVEYORS r - - 71 4 I I �a ; I + + ! 6fi32 S 191 st PLACE SUITE E-102 00 Q ! I f J �rG I ; +� r I ` KENT, WASHINGTON 98032 - w- r',n�i I 1 I ' '`, I i I 425-251-0665 o - s i` I! II tI9 ••-+ II I I I I TION ZONING INFORMA 78 36' A " 204 TOTAL ACREAGE 0, 41 ACRES x 03 88`t6 W . `' TOTAL LOTS 3LOTS :- ZONE R8SO �'I f D ROAD AREA 0 C' SMALLEST LOT 3410 S.F gg,, 4 I` PROPOSED USE SINGLE FAMILY HOME �) LOT I N s8-Is460 \ SOIL TYPE ALDERDWOOD'-AgC �, ` � ' � E I ,-�� _ - - _ - _ _ - _ 'r--, DRAINAGE WELL DRAINED + I 2 I _ I ,� VEGETATION GRASS t, 6,826. sqft,. I 'cril LEGEND f +o .� I 0.�15 acres � I .,\ I � � f � _ . I I ``,I�\ 0 TELEPHONE 'CABINS CB (TYPE 1) �}¢T �, g i SIGN I o ;q I � tiw�` G , I i SANITARY SEWER MH I I u' I of F� �S I 13 I C� - CONIFER TREE o ti �sn - �a WATER VALVE ,y DOWf�S11A'Mr� I I P'`' 3 I r I O O DECIDUOUS TREE AWN(,' 10` TH A�16 sl; � I k I I - 3,410. sq.ft. I I v� j,NJ 20 ® WATER METER/SERVICE 0.07 acres I le 2 o MAIL BOX � � FIRE HYDRANT L- - ; =- - : - ,' Ion `'-4 UTILITY POLE + PK NAIL _ _ 68LW 7 7,nc, I ��°�fi'�G� 72�.4Y I ,� ,• � 1 � � L a GUY WIRE 1 ® E ON IN REBARASEPIPE o / ' UI A + NT i 30' WW WEE'"� f7'+, S NOTED 3' WATER MAIN EASEME ! . I 30 l' RECORDING NO. ,4513645 REC J EX. HOUSE J J r i r I D W►TE.1? . }. - C Ct's1r;D B 2''..BW.......... . #� A r- '77/6�4, Dept. of Development and Environmental Services Corrected or Additional Land Use owivision Information or Studies List 900 Oakesdale Avvenueuesouthwest Renton, Washington 98055-1219 Application No: L03SO031 (NGY SP) Filed on: Please provide the following information. Please submit the same number of revised documents as the number of copies required with your initial application, and a minimum of 3 copies of each special study. B. Access and Traffic, King County Road Standards (KCRS): 105"' Avenue SE is classified as urban local access. 1993 King County Road Standards Section 2.03 requires curb gutter and sidewalk along the property frontage unless a variance is obtained. No action is required at this time. C. Drainage, King County Surface Water Design Manual (SWDM): 1. Surface water drainage appears to flow across the property off 105`h Avenue Southeast. A drainage easement for this flow shall be provided prior to engineering plan approval unless a diversion adjustment is approved (SWDM Section 1.2.1), allowing the flow to be conveyed along 105`h Avenue Southeast. No action is required at this time unless an adjustment is desired. 2. Neighbors have complained about storm water ponding at the SW property corner. A conceptual drainage plan shall be provided (SWDM Section 1.1.4) which mitigates the flooding problem. (a) A drainage conveyance system may be provided to convey concentrated runoff across the down -slope properties to an acceptable discharge point. Drainage easements for this conveyance system must be secured from downstream property owners and recorded prior to engineering plan approval (SWDM Section 1.2.1.1c). Letters of intent shall be included with the next submittal. (b) Alternatively, you may propose a diversion of the flow entering the property (off 105") and conveying it to an acceptable discharge location. 3. Letters of Intent: Provide a letters from down -slope property owners [option 2. (a)] indicating a willingness to grant an easement for future drainage flows crossing their properties (to include the 100-year overflow). 4. The conceptual drainage plan failed to demonstrate compliance with the small site BMP's (SWDM Appendix Q. Verification of compliance shall be included in the conceptual drainage plan. 5. Conceptual Drainage Plan: Submit 3 copies of a conceptual drainage plan, which is prepared, stamped, and signed by a professional engineer licensed in the State of Washington. Note: A meeting with LUSD staff is recommended prior to the next submittal. Please contact Curt Foster at (206) 296-7106 to request a meeting. F96\sprs\InfoStdy.L8t 2/10/98 c1c Page I f\ 0 Date: � ' tP ' S APPROVED fps s�oo '- JAN ICING COUNTY FIRE ENGINEERING �6�1 TO: Fire Engineering FM: 3 The following conditions were observed during a recent field inspection of the subject property. I understand that any of these conditions are not acceptable for access roads which could serve more than two lots. Roadway surface is less than 20 feet in width. Roadway surface is not an all --weather surface capable of supporting 25 tons. (Gross vehicle weight) Minimum overhead clearance is less than 13-feet, 6 inches. Maximum roadway grade exceeds 15 percent. Roadway exceeds 150 feet in length and dead -ends. Bridge(s) do not appear to meet the same ! requirements as for access roads. y None of the above. do F7eV—o/3 3 •5P/FieldRpt.Frm 04/12/90 9p 'a t } l , 1 .� ]-J /,.f.2' Li cn n 0 s w 14 DOwI�STI��[ ALONG I04TVI DNE SE I EJRVEY NOTES STRUMENT: NIKON TOTAL STATION DTMAtOLG ZZ==THOD USED: FIELD TRAVERSE WITH ACTUAL i 1 FIELD MEASUREMENTS AND ANGLES �' -- WAC 332-130-090 I % ATE OF SURVEY: APRIL, 2003 I t +SIS OF BEARING: N88 03'12"E, SE 172ND STREET i PLAT OF AKER'S FARM NO. 5 a 1 �NCHMARK: SSMH AT SE CORNER OF PROPERTY f .-206 RIM ELEV = 200.39 (SOOK CREEK) I/� f 50.00' N 8816'46" r-- - - - - OWNER/DEVELOPER TENG NGY AND MORENY NGY 5563 156th AVE SE BELLEVUE, WA 98006 425-653-3402 LAND SURVEYOR TOUMA ENGINEERS '& LAND SURVEYORS 6632 S 191st PLACE SUITE E-102 KENT, WASHINGTON 98032 425-251-0665 ZONING INFORMATION TOTAL ACREAGE TOTAL LOTS I ZONE ROAD ROAD AREA LOT LOT I PROPOSED USE 2 6,826. SOIL TYPE I sq.ft� DRAINAGE I 01 S acres I VEGETATION ND :B (TYPE 1) L/ �ATER ANITSEWER MH VALVE } 1 3' WATER MAIN EASES ENT. RECORDING NO. 4513645 , 0.41 ACRES 3 LOTS R8SO 0 3410 S. F SINGLE FAMILY HOME ALDERDWOOD ' -AgC WELL DRAINED GRASS ° TELEPHONE -CABI ,VATER METER/SERVICE SIRE HYDRANT o li-nuTY POLE 3UY WIRE SIGN CONIFER TREE DECIDUOUS TREE MAIL BOX PK NAIL MON IN CASE/ r - -- o EX REBAR /PIPE k01 ``'�'° ►t AS NOTED ' `1� This certificate provides h7f0rrp8ti0n necessary to evaluate development proposals. SODS CREEK WATER AND SEWER DISTRICT CERTIFICATE OF WATER AVAILABILITY Type: Short SubDivision : Applicant's Name: Teng Ngy Proposed Use: 3 Single Family Residences Location: Lot:10 Block: 2 Development: AKERS FARMS NO 5 Parcel: 008700 0133 Address: 17003 105TH AVE SE, RENTON Information: WATER PURVEYOR INFORMATION 1. a ❑ Water will be provided by service connection only to an existing Null inch water main, Null feet from the site. And / Other h Water service will require an improvemnt to the water system of: Water service to the proposed short plat will require the installation of approximately 125 If of water main, layout and route to be determined based on final site plans. All plans must be approved by and meet the requirements of the King County Eire Marshal and Soos Creek Water and Sewer District. 2, a ® The water system is in conformance with a County approved water comprehensive plan. b ❑ The water system improvement will require a water comprehensive plan amendment. 3" 'a ® The proposed project is within the corporate limit§, of the district, or has been granted Boundary Review Board approval for extension of service outside the district or city, or is within the County approved service area of a private water purveyor. b ❑ Annexation or Boundary Review Board approval will be necessary to provide service. 4. a ® Water is/or will be available at the rate of flow and duration indicated below at no less than 20 psi measured at the nearest fire hydrant 66 feet from the building/property (or as marked on the attached map): Rate of Flow; 1,000 gpm Duration: 2 hours or More b ❑ Water systems is not capable of providing fire flow. Cross Connection Control devices must be in conformance with state laws. Serv,'.ce is subject to the applicants agreement to comply and perform to make such installation and/or connections to the standards, regulations, requirements and conditions of this District and such other agency or agencies having jurisdiction. This District is not representing that it's facilities will be extended or otherwise modified to make such service available to the applicant. It is the responsibility of the applicant to make any required extension of facilities to serve their property. I hereby certify that the above water purveyor information is true. This certification shall be valid for one year from date of signature. SOOS CREEK.WATER & SEWER DISTRICT Lori Bergstrom 10/ ' Agency Name Signatory Name Date Development Coordinator Title Sow CreekWner k Sawa Diatrid "rpfAv&U1n&tcPArec1AcWWata" 2/&N L 0 Q0 'N 0 %, —�-% ZI alure ❑ � ot� D NOV 14 2003 K.C. D.D.E.S. FILE NO. 839-001-021 PREPARED BY TOUMA ENGINEERS 6632 SOUTH 191 ST PLACE, SUITE E-102 KENT, WA. 98032 (425) 251-0665 November 13, 2003 u ' Y A:i V' . s� K.C. D.D.E,S. TABLE OF CONTENTS I. PROJECT OVERVIEW & FIGURES II. CORE A& SPECIAL REQUIREMENTS III. OFF -SITE ANALYSIS IV. STORM WATER V. CONVEYANCE SYSTEM ANALYSIS VI. SPECIAL REPORTS & STUDIES VI1. BASIN & COMMUNITY PLANNING AREAS VIII, OTHER PERMITS IX, EROSION/SEDIMENTATION CONTROL DESIGN X. BOND QUANTITIES WORKSHEET XI, MAINTENANCE & OPERATIONS MANUAL. tdl/ I 6 KIWIS a iui I,ray A19 I" 6TH ST 114, ST UM Will 4 — o,lo n 14 ST 'j, on CT I rl sir ST IILIU 1, 1 Oil t �ml I cc m 0 w m 3RD S, I 1 .1 UIAD 1 1 RfNTON AIR11ORT ORT Wy s A Er _1 N 1 R S 1 t 0 2! 5 TILLIUM _sr s rM fCm ST 1100 S S S VICIORf TOWN Iw, -18 Hs 17.4 N LM C, - X-tv. xr S 3RD ST VL Ix FRED six ZINO, 5 5MF)( S ITH Sw 7TH IT TH s 5 1z gg s TH T E 1p a4 FE Rr NrM VIUA" CENTERwtT! p Ayi S- VILLAGE RENTON CQI?, 2 0 16TH ST IfiTH 4 7 ST 5 16TH ST E PR 16TH ST 14 A9 I9:sT ST P LL 1 •T ST Icr 'FT 211T, A r2m, PL s je St ZLST ST SW43RD ST'r 23RD ST S 6?Nlf 5 .1 . M. S 21TH st 1 � 40 S1U19110 cl if! "t Midi, St 30 If Win ST ST e.9W 3RD . . . . . 33RD St psi ItMH I 1.1pilt sl ;E L W1111 M Si T s , 16 FS 1 5? SW 4TH," ARE,, ST s sl a.v sA 51 BTH mmA A.; sr i, fill W, Wdil sw sj: Si W 41ST V. liffill. vl k, iAkF r u Ur "'AW, AkF am Inc ArC M 37 OF AlW' Inc R Py Subst" i AgG at) ABD 20 9 455 Akl Age AkF A pu r5 15) ApC C (Ag ROD yj) M 2 416' [7, Age :1 It _ E BM& Sk AgC NSD t 7, 428 �i Ai I a I Or 7 am 29 . , 11I. " , ;�, 12 A 160 Sk in- S 01 7 Al !Y ASS 1,34 v. Age 'k J..,• AlIL114 ..,,II!T_F VIA•; , I AgCO 'R, k Sk • Sk M , Ur 476 It % 3 A - , �,: " . !%- 'APB' 4 It. C • Age 5. Agu *a W" '. V., , I .IL 4AgTank- e, - - '• ,,. !If : I Sk`{... oh Age.) AgR 7 4• ;3 ;2 Sk AgB N Eva MD A PL, N.0 k Ago A C W, A 1Arn!3- Sk • InC IAfR• Agb A El Age A I,. C KC 1 3 SW29-� ,j lai� I �h 7 A vi i-b �C IA: 'JA p 18 bOUNGARY L ep y 22 —o.'y LOW I It JA WO W A A. rl 18 "TI 77 0 BoUMk7ARY A.-f !2-3— ;Pip . '3iiii 1. 04 A C�l 6 N/A�4 1,Lie L lu Is ICI ST m i 1 x.Y" :�� n�� mil,• 4 N .`• _ _ _ _ — .•� _ _E _ _ _ 1 r rncr � rYl _pQ LAI ILI cc .0 EL 4rn 174 f^' ; /' I I �I / r •} c :'� III ^r� � '� � '� Cot OAR 4' At --Tr I I ' ; r T1 gE t f ' 1 I 7,810. sq. ft. I '•, 0.17 acres I ' , L - - -- _ 1 50.00' I N 88'16'46' IN , `, 3 r in r----^---:� IEll, N I r I I 4l I � r 8816'46" W , I LOr N 88'16'46`'N 2 6,626. aq.ft. I I 0.15 acres I ♦I I t ,LOT-,3 C; r , 3 3,410. sq.ft. �' 0,07 acres --^ — -^ ----Ulu' y ; N8O'i 6'�L6"V 3' WATER MAIN EASEJENT 'r RECORDING NO. 45136'45 � r , r r l q � LEGAL DESCRIPTION EAST PLAT RECORDED INOF LOT IVOLUME 40 OFOPLATSR AGE 27NRECORDS OF KING COUNTY; SITUATE IN THE COUNTY OF KING, STATE OF WASHINGTON. 128.41' I - I r ' O93 r I I I I i r I YI 30' EX. DOUSE ' I , r 1 r SE 172ND SIREN 8BN 'O3'12" E (BASIS OF BEARINO) SWM CORE REQUIREMENTS CORE REQUIREMENT #I: DISCHARGE AT THE NATURAL LOCATION The allowable outflow from the site will be discharged to its natural location. The lowest elevation on the site is approximately 188.00. Refer to topography map prepared for the site. CORD. REQUIREMENTS 42: OFF -SITE ANALYSIS Refer to off -site analysis on subsequent pages. CORE REQUIREMENTS #3: RUNOFF CONTROL Roof top, driveway, landscape, and grassed areas will be added to the existing drainage basin from the proposed two new lots. The roof drains from the new homes will be built upon completion of the short plat. The difference of peak runoff between -pre - development and post -development for a 100-year storm is less t an , l" cfs. ` lease refer to calculations on following pages of this report. Water quality control will not be required since the new impervious surfaces subject to tragic or automobiles will be less than 5000 square feet for these 2 lots. 6 to CORE REQUIREMENTS #4: CONVEYANCE SYSTEM Do not anticipate conveyance system to be installed. CORE REQUIREMENTS #5: EROSION/SEDIMENTATION CONTROL. PLAN The Erosion/Sedimentation control facilities will consist of filter fabric fences to be placed along; the north and east boundary of the site. CORE REQUIREMENTS #b NIA CORE REQUIREMENTS #7 NIA CORE REQUIREMENT'S #8 N/A MAINTENANCE AND OPERATIONS FINANCIAL GUARANTEES WATER QUALITY SPECIAL REQUIREMENTS Other Adopted Area Specific Requirements — NIA 2, Flood Plain Delineation — N/A Flood Protection Facilities — NIA 4, Water Quality Source Control — NIA 5. Oil Control — NIA 111. OFF -SITE ANALYSIS Resource Review Vicinity Map Site Topo King County Sensitive Areas Folio 1. UPSTREAM The site is the situated within a small drainage basin encompassing the site area. There is no appreciable off site runoff observed. The property falls within a Level 2 drainage basin feeding into the Duwamish River several miles downstream of the site. 2. DOWNSTREAM Surface runoff from the site areas eet flows west across a similar lot situated immediately west of the property. The runoff is then intercepted by open ditches on 105' Avenue SE and directs the _flow south to connect to existing storm system in SR 515. The surface runoff is directed north on SR 515 for approximately one mile to a crossing on "falbot Road South which then it directs the drainage to the west and eventually to SR 167 storm system. No downstream erosion has been noted. KCRTS Command ------------- CREATE a new Time Series ------------------------ Production of Runoff Time Series Project Location Sea-Tac Computing Series : pre-dev.tsf Regional. Scale Factor : 1.00 Data Type Reduced Creating Hourly Time Series File Loading Time Series File:C:\KC_SWDM\KC_DATA \STTG60R.rnf ,'fill Grass 0.35 acres Loading Time Series File:C:\KC_SWDM\KC_DATA \STE160R.rnf Impervious 0.06 acres -------------- Total 41 acres Peak Discharge: 0.102 CF at 6:00 on Jan 9 in Year 8 Storing Time Series File:pre- dev.tsf Time Series Computed KCRTS Command ------------- CREATE a new Time Series ------------------------ Production of Runoff Time Series Project Location : Sea-Tac Computing Series post-dev.tsf Regional Scale Factor 1.00 Data Type Reduced Creating Hourly Time Series File Loading Time Series File:C:\KC_SWDM\KC—DATA \STTG60R.rnf `Pill Grass 0.25 acres Loading Time Series File:C:\KC SWDM\KC_DATA \STE160R.rnf Impervious 0.16 acres Total -------------- A 41 acres Peak Discharge: 0.:128 CFS a 6:00 on Jan 9 in Year 8 Storing Time Series File:post- dev.tsf SIII FIGURE III-2. RAINFALL REGIONS AND SCALE FACTORS } ST 1.0/ ST 1.0 LA 0.8 LA 0.9 LALA 1.2 ST 1.1;1 ,1.0 MLN cuYNTT t / PNV.L M NINO 40UNT go: rA- rm y .JL`.ri i�d i x,., f jl �� �� `4. i...1�:1.. '•�;1 '':+' , y 1 ` ,' 1<; ST 1.1 J.1l RCF COUNTY - ST 1.0 v i� ST 1.01 Rainfall Regions and LA 0.8 Regional Scale Factors LA 0.9 EZ, 41 Incorporated Area LA 1.0 LA 1.2 —am River/Lake Major Road 111-4 KCRTS User's Guide December 15, 1995 t LAND USE SERVICES DIVISION ROUTING/TRANSMITTAL FORM Date: 0 -'3 G cr�l�i� i/�/54�� 3 J TO: «Name», «JobTitle» «Section», «Division» G &e1-e 7— FM: Rich Hudson, Planner III, Current Planning Section RE: Proposed Short Plat of LUSD File No. L O Screening Meeting: Location: Planner: Attached are the following items for your review: 0. Site Plan c--- 2,? pg'�� 7--0 A-7 «2. Specific Studies X ,C5C,-157 C— / ) «3. Legal Description/Assessor Map _ _ L� L dj ',X If you have any questions regarding the meeting, please contact the assigned planner. If you are unable to attend the meeting, please forward written comments, requests for additional info to the planner, prior to this meeting. Thanks. Attachments cc: Curt Foster File _ x> �i��i".�;t'��§l°"iiiit�,i;�,� ""_"���� $°i �iifl��=== q sT��i�' �g •` �g�j}j;�� e g � �19£�• 3s,�§�,,;I�i��;���Y,"��fl, #:'=sS•"i� �?� L` �'° y_ 9 4? �" �¢si"."ie3auaa i�}p a £ s(i°E xx %¢ � °7 B §� :EEt.l �§g �� ,cy�S S'• £>t ¢+�j$�$ E=(8�pf$t§�s�{[?Y {£=[u iir:x �+"n�a�7j� King County Alternative formats available Department of Development and Environmental Services Land Use Services Division upon request 900 Oakesdale Avenue Southwest Renton, Washington 98055-1219 (206) 296-6600 TTY (206) 296-7217 File No. �J§itN�",__;.....,:. e Owner's Name / Street city Zip Phone Agents Name Street City Zip Phone c54tliP� QS' 01 114o' Address/Location of Property Size of Property No. of Lots 1/4 1/4 SEC TWP RGE Legal Description Tax Account No. �5 9N� 2f 23 5' 2©CLo/ /d 1AI &.4 at ,grC2e1s ;? No. S,,�.s�e > Signature Owner uthorized Agent Date,, (I certify that the info���Iatio r ded by me is true and correctQ) the e f my knowledge) **************** *******************p0 NOT WRITE BELOW THIS LINE ****************************** Date: Technician: Kroll: Zoning: Min. Lot Area Restrictions: Min. Lot Width Community Planning Area: Comprehensive Plan Designation: Shorelines: Env: Sensitive Areas Map No.: Landslide Floodplain Fish Bearing Wetland Erosion Coal Mine Seismic Steep Slope Streams, Class: Known Unmapped Sensitive Areas: Critical Drainage Basin: SWM Variance Requested? CIP Project? Access: Proof of Access Required? Yes Row Use Permit Required? Street Road Variance Requested? CIP Project? Sensitive Area Variance Requested? Certificate of Water Availability Required? Certificate of Sewer Availability Required? Health Department Approval Required? SEPA Required? fro (SA, 2ndG,P.B.) FEES State Highway? Yes No Cities within 3 miles? City Utilities? Critical Corridor? Yes No Bald Eagle Nest Buffer? Yes No Bald Eagle Habitat Area? Yes No Forest Dist. AG Dist. I RELATED FILES: 4�� . tlt /�O� r R E C � � V E 0 NOV 14 2003 K.C. D.D.E.S. Proof of Legal Lot Required? Other: Short Plat Application lc-app-shplat 11/05/01L 0 U 0®� I 1 of 2 Z dO Z a6ed TO/SO/TT zeldys-dde.-ni ualleallft leld VO4S # 0 L mea 4 ol.si. a-d :94 e(] de�; ®��avdo:�-fie a� Application'for Land Use,,,, Permits King County Department of Development and Environmental Services ` Land use services Division Alternative formats available 900 Oakesdale Avenue Southwest upon requestRenton. Washington 98055.1219 (206) 2964606, - TTY (206) 296.7217 s , Application Number(s): . LG SO . 013 n W� NOV 14 Z003 K.C. D.D.E.S. Date Received: (Starr ' DO NOT WRITE ABOVE THIS DIVIDER I (We) request the following permits) or approval(s): ❑ Building'Permit �,Q 3``Shoreline Substantial Development Permit 0'r' : Clearing $,Grading Permit Shoreline Conditional Use Permit ❑: .,y:;Terrtporary Use Permit ��: ,,,;':0 . Shoreline Variance ❑ Binding Site,,Plan' ? "}' Q Shoreline Redesignation ❑ . ,'bite-0i7eveivpment Permit `, O Zoning Variance ❑ s;86uhda y Line Adjustment' Conditional Use Permit " 5i'iort:Siabdiv,ision ' . ' . '"" 'r'Y'' a Reuse of Public Schools ❑ . Formai:Subdivision ; `.a' Special Use Permit ❑ ,Urban.Planned Development . ;; 0 ..Zone Reclassification ❑ Plat Alteration',- Site Specific Comprehensive Plan Amendmen'� ❑ Plat Vacation `" ❑ P-Suffix Amendment ❑ Road.Varlance ❑ Special District Overlay Removal . ❑ Drainage Variance or Adjustment ❑ Reasonable Use Exception Q Right -of -Way Use Permit „'Q . Public Agency & Utility Exception ❑ Shoreline Exemption ❑, Period Review for Mining Sites "� I, %cry 2. being duly sworn, state that I am the owner or (print name) officer of the corporation owning propertyidescribed in the legal description filed with this application and that I have reviewed the rules and reguiations-of the Department of Development and Environmental Services (ODES) regarding the1':pre.1 t- ;-- find,:filing of this application and that all statements,, an:;wers and information submitted with: this,, pp01oation`,,are, In all respects true, accurate and complete to th j best of.my knowledge and belief.f��� During the review of this application,fit'h)ay,,be-.necessary for DDES staff to make one or more site,visits. By signing this application form, you 'areigiv._irtg.permission for these visits. If it is rental property,'d,e owner hereby agrees to notify tenants'of'possible site :visits, printed name sig t mailing address, `_ '' corporation or company name, . city state telephone zrp," : If applicable, state below, the name; -address -and telephone number of the authorized applicant for'this application as shown on the Certification'and';Transfer;of�Application Status form filed with this, application, name mailing address telephone _ . r . city stare zip Application fpr Land Use Permit(s) I, Ic.,app;iuper 2111l02 Page 1 of 2 Page 1 of 2 Dye, Petev MMµ From: Dye, Pete o Sent: Friday, August 03, 2007 4:30 PM To: 'mark olson' Subject: RE: Ngy Short Plat L03SO031 Sounds like your project is still not ready to proceed. For now, we have decided to cancel the engineering activity. Let me know in the future when your client is better prepared and we will accept a new application to continue the engineering review process. From: mark olson [mailto:mark@cornerstone-engr.com] Sent: Tuesday, July 31, 2007 2.19 PM To: Dye, Pete Subject: RE: Ngy Short Plat L03SO031 Mr. Dye, Concerning the final short plat application, activity number L06SR054, as a representative of Mr Ngy I have been unable to obtain professional engineering services to complete the engineering plans for the re -submittal to date. As you may know there is a lack of professional services available for this size of project and all engineers and firms we have spoken with are a minimum of 4 weeks out to get these completed. My question is if Mr. Ngy were to come in to DDES and submit the signed budget agreement and the permit fees if we could continue to keep the file actively open until the engineering plans can be completed and re -submitted. Additionally, if you happen to know of an engineering resource that could complete the engineering plans in a reasonable time frame, we would welcome the reference. Thank you in advance for your consideration, Mark W. Olson, P.E. Principal / Owner Cornerstone Engineering, Inc. 14201 NE 200th Street, Suite 200 . Woodinville, WA 98072 Ph: 206.250.7306 Fax: 425.487.1734 www. cornerstone�eng!. com -----Original Message ----- From: Dye, Pete [ma ilto:Pete. Dye@METROKC. GOV] Sent: Thursday, June 28, 2007 2:39 PM To: mark olson Subject: RE: Ngy Short Plat L03SO031 will keep the file open through July. When you submit, be sure to address all items outlined in my attached correspondence from Oct. 06, including a signed budget agreement from the applicant and payment of fees. don't recall requesting any soils report? From: mark olson [mailto:mark@cornerstone-engr.com] Sent: Thursday, June 28, 2007 1:32 PM To: Dye, Pete Subject: Ngy Short Plat L03SO031 Mr Dye, i am the engineer of record for the above referenced short plat for Teng Ngy located at 17003 10511 Ave SE, 08/03/2007 Jan Illian From: Laureen M. Nicolay Sent: Thursday, July 02, 2009 8:40 AM To: Carrie Olson; Kayren K. Kittrick Cc: Jan Illian Subject: RE: Correction -- Ngy Short Plat--Engineering/recording stage Yes, Jan Illian is working on this one. She now has the file. I told the applicant that I was working on a time extension for him and that Jan would be looking into getting his unexpended County fees refunded. Laureen Nicolay, Senior Planner City of Renton Development Planning 1055 S. Grady Way Renton, WA 98057 (425) 430-7294 phone (425) 430-7231 fax Inicolay_@lentonwa.gov From: Carrie Olson Sent: Wednesday, July 01, 2009 2:05 PM To: Kayren K. Kittrick; Laureen M. Nicolay Subject: RE: Correction -- Ngy Short Plat--Engineering/recording stage I think the $10,548 are for King County fees. I have not received this project for review or recording and King County has not recorded it. Has there been a plan reviewer assigned to this project who could contact the applicant to guide him forward to review and recording? From: Kayren K. Kittrick Sent: Monday, June 29, 2009 9:48 AM To: Carrie Olson Subject: FW: Correction -- Ngy Short Plat--Engineering/recording stage Hi Carrie, Do you have this already by any chance? If not, would you please look into it. Thanks! Kayren K. Kittrick Development Engineering Supervisor Inspections & Permits From: Laureen M. Nicolay Sent: Monday, June 29, 2009 9.43 AM To: Kayren K. Kittrick Subject: FW: Correction -- Ngy Short Plat--Engineering/recording stage Hi Kayren, R Mr. Ngy has been calling about the status of his project and about a refund of his (evidently) unexpended fees. Who will be processing this please? Laureen Nicolay, Senior Planner City of Renton Development Planning 1055 S. Grady Way Renton, WA 98057 (425) 430-7294 phone (425) 430-7231 fax Inicolay@rentonwa.gov From: Laureen M. Nicolay Sent: Tuesday, June 23, 2009 2:01 PM To: Kayren K. Kittrick Subject: FW: Correction -- Ngy Short Plat--Engineering/recording stage Found it. Now we need someone assigned to finalize it. It appears it may be due to expire this September if we don't extend it. He also would like a determination regarding whether he can reclaim his $10,500 that the County transferred to us. Laureen Nicolay, Senior Planner City of Renton Development Planning 1055 S. Grady Way Renton, WA 98057 (425) 430-7294 phone (425) 430-7231 fax Inicolav rentonwa.gov From: Jan Illian Sent: Tuesday, June 23, 2009 12:57 PM To: Laureen M. Nicolay; Jennifer T. Henning; Carrie Olson; Michael D Dotson; Kayren K. Kittrick; Michael D Dotson; Richard Moreno; Arneta J. Henninger; Neil R. Watts Subject: RE: Correction -- Ngy Short Plat We do have NGY From: Laureen M. Nicolay Sent: Tuesday, June 23, 2009 11:24 AM To: Jennifer T. Henning; Jan Illian; Carrie Olson; Michael D Dotson; Kayren K. Kittrick; Michael D Dotson; Richard Moreno; Arneta J. Henninger; Neil R. Watts Subject: RE: Correction -- Ngy Short Plat Name is Officially Ngy Short Plat. As it turns out, the County permit records show they closed out one of these files, so we are only needing to find L06FRO48 Laureen Nicolay, Senior Planner City of Renton Development Planning 1055 S. Grady Way Renton, WA 98057 (425) 430-7294 phone (425) 430-7231 fax Inicolay@rent_onwa.goy From: Jennifer T. Henning Sent: Tuesday, June 23, 2009 11:03 AM To: Laureen M. Nicolay; Jan Iilian; Carrie Olson; Michael D Dotson; Kayren K. Kittrick; Michael D Dotson; Richard Moreno; Arneta J. Henninger; Neil R. Watts Subject: RE: Fay Lee Short Plats I have not seen this one .... has anyone checked the boxes that Ken has on the south side of this floor? From: Laureen M. Nicolay Sent: Tuesday, June 23, 2009 10:53 AM To: Jennifer T. Henning; Jan Illian; Carrie Olson; Michael D Dotson; Kayren K. Kittrick; Michael D Dotson; Richard Moreno; Arneta J. Henninger; Neil R. Watts Subject: Fay Lee Short Plats King County just told this applicant that we have his two pending short plats, but I find no trace. The customer wonders what still needs to be done to record them. The only Permits Plus documentation is a King County check for $10,548.70 processed by Holly as a MISC receipt. I am afraid to call and ask the County since I am not certain that we don't have them. Anyone seen King County file number L06FR054 or? Laureen Nicolay, Senior Planner City of Renton Development Planning 1055 S. Grady Way Renton, WA 98057 (425) 430-7294 phone (425) 430-7231 fax Inicolay@rentonwa.gov ►) E N is I N E E R I N ©, I N C. CIVIL # STRUCTURAL s SURVEY Prepared For: 14201 NE 200`s Street, Suite 200 Woodinville, WA 98072 Email: cei@comerstone-engr.com Web: www,cornerstone-engr.cwm (King County Short Subdivision No. L03S0031) 17003 105th Avenue Southeast Renton, WA 98055 King County Mr. Tong Ngy 5563 156th Avenue SE Bellevue, WA 98006 Prepared By: Mark W. Olson, P.E. Prepared Date: September 23, 2006 CEI Project No.: 04-32001 Revision No.: 00 EXPIRES: 02-1: Phone: (425) 487-1732 (206)250-7306 Fax:(425) 487-1734 OCT 0 9 Pr. D Comprehensive Design Solutions for Your Project Success! K.C. p.p.E.S. Project: Ngy Short Plat Date: September 23, 2006 Client: Teng Ngy Prepared By: M. Olson CEI No.: 04-32001 Page , Section Title 1. Project Overview 2 2. Conditions & Requirements Summary 20 3. Offsite Analysis 21 4. Flow Control & Water Quality Facility Analysis and Design 26 5. Conveyance System Analysis and Design 34 6. Special Reports and Studies 36 7. Other Permits 37 8. Erosion and Sediment Control Analysis & Design 38 9. Bond Quantities, Facility Summaries & Declaration of Covenant 52 10. Operations and Maintenance Manual 62 14201 NE 200`' Street, Suite 200 Woodinville, WA 98072 Email: cei@cornerstone-engr.com Web: www.comersione-cngr.com CGR NErR5irON E (E- a- NEE R I N O. I N C. Phone: (425) 487-1732 (250) 250-7306 Fax: (425) 487-1734 Project: Ngy Short flat Client: Teng Ngy CEI No.: 04-32001 Date: September 23, 2006 Prepared By: M. Olson Pave tl/ 1.0 PROJECT OVERVIEW Ngy Short Plat proposes the construction of a 3-lot single family development short plat within the King County jurisdiction. Creation of this development is performed under King County's short plat building permit application number L03S0031. The project is located at 17003 105" Avenue Southeast, Renton WA 98055. The legal description for the property indicates that it consists of the east '/z of the lot 10 in block 2 of Aker's Farm No. 5, as per plat recorded in Volume 40 of Plats, Page 27, Records of King County; Situate in the County of King, State of Washington. The location of the property is illustrated in Figure 2. The subject property has a total area of approximately 0.41 acres. The project calls for the construction of 2 detached single family units within 3 individual lots. Lot 1 contains an existing single family dwelling. The two proposed sigle family dwellings are to be constructed on Lots 2 & 3. A private access tract is also planned to facilitate access to all three lots. The private access tract will be part of the total area of proposed Lot 3. Figure 3 provides an illustration of the site characteristics. The SCS Soil Survey for King County indicates that the site is underlain by Alderwood Gravelly Sandy Loam (AgC), as illustrated in Figure 4. This soil type has a slow to moderate runoff potential. Slopes on the project site range from two to sixteen percent. Generally speaking, existing runoff from the site flows to the southwesterly corner of the property and onto the adjacent residential property. The proposed flow control for the site will be achieved by collecting the runoff into a detention vault located near the natural discharge location and then pumped back up to the municipal owned drainage facilities (ditches and culverts) along 1051h Avenue South. 14201 NE 20& Street, Suite 200 Phone: (425) 487-1732 Woodinville, WA 98072 (250) 250-7306 Email: cei@cornerstone-engr.com COr7Ner'151rN E E R I N 6, I N C.ONE Fax: (425) 487-1734 E N 6 1 Web: www.carnerstone-engr.com EO l KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON, SURFACE WATER DESIGN MANUAL TECHNICAL INFORMATION REPORT (TIR) WORKSHEET Part 1 PROJECT OWNER AND PROJECT ENGINEER Project OwnerTEIJQ t46V Ago 'QgENY y Phone 12D - 351--19'i¢ Address 55fa3 t GTA A* Se_ Project Engineer tAAja►L W. OL-ScrV , P.1E, Company GP-1JEPcff..hWe� �J IJOEELZ-104� Phone Part S TYPE OF PERMIT APPLICATION L'2 Landuse Services Subdivison / ShortSubd. I UPD ® Building Services M/F 1 Commerical 1 SFR U Clearing and Grading U Right -of -Way Use ® Other Part 2 PROJECT LOCATION AND DESCRIPTION Project Name Neil Srr per DDES Permit # I.4D350p3 1 Location Township 23 V4 Range oS E Section 29 Site Address 1:1003 105TM A V _SE— lzlel►rb-el, WA qs Part 4 OTHER REVIEWS AND PERMITS DFW HPA Shoreline COE 404 Management DOE Dam Safety L] Structural ® Floodplain Rockery/Vault/ FEMA � ESA Section 7 COE Wetlands Other Part 5-PLAN'AND REPORT INFORMATION Technical information Report Site Improvement Plan (Engr. Plans) Type of Drainage ReviewcISD Targeted I Type (circle one): Full Modified (circle): Large Site mall Site Date (include revision 09%74/04o QEV, O Date (include revision Qg1273%0(o R$V 0% dates): dates): Date of Final: Date of Final: Part 6 ADJUSTMENT APPROVALS Type (circle one): Standard 1 omplex 1 Preapplication 1 Experimental/ Blanket Description: (include conditions in TIR Section 2) Date of 2005 Surface Water Design Manual 1 111105 - r1'r.'�1 KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON, SURFACE WATER DESIGN MANUAL TECHNICAL INFORMATION REPORT (TIR) WORKSHEET Part,7 MONITORING REQUIREMENTS Monitoring Required: Yes 16�) Describe: Start Date: Completion Date: Part 8 SITE COMi 'U"'mTY-AND DRAINAGE BASIN Community Plan : CtT'`I aF QENTarI— GAL Special District Overlays: Drainage Basin: F3LAC — QVE� Stormwater Requirements: Part 9- ONSITE AND -ADJACENT SENSITIVE AREAS L3 River/Stream Steep Slope El Lake J Erosion Hazard Ll Wetlands Ll Landslide Hazard ® Closed Depression Ll Coal Mine Hazard ® Floodplain Ll Seismic Hazard Ll Other ® Habitat Protection El f Part 10 SOILS I Sail Type G WZArwarJ Slopes 2 - 14, 96 ® High Groundwater Table (within 5 feet) Q Sole Source Aquifer Other ® Seeps/Springs ® Additional Sheets Attached Erosion Potential 2005 Surface Water Design Manual 2 111105 T-tUVIe I 60A-r) S KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON, SURFACE WATER DESIGN MANUAL TECHNICAL INFORMATION REPORT (TIR) WORKSHEET Part 11 "DRAINAGE; DESIGN LIMITATIONS t .. REFERENCE LIMITATION 1 SITE CONSTRAINT 13 Core 2 - Offsite Analysis ® Sensitive/Critical Areas U SEPA ® Other nn ® Additional Sheets Attached Part 12, TIR SUMMARY SHEET rovide one TIR Summary Sheet per Threshold Dischar a Area Threshold Discharge Area: 5%w, To W COLAR4=0 DN-SITe A Pt"PEP lb t�-)LtS'nN4 MW1J4GcpAL name or description) SW. CoNvG AAACE G"06104 CDITN+ I CULVE*TSP4 IDS'" hV unl . Core Requirements (all 8 apply) Discharge at Natural Location do Number of Natural Discharge Locations: o l Offsite Analysis ✓ Level: (1y 2 / 3 dated: {(;23 oh Flow Control Level: 1 2 / 3 or Exemption Number Incl. facility summary sheet Small Site BMPs Conveyance System Spill containment located at: Erosion and Sediment Control ESC Site Supervisor: Contact Phone: After Hours Ph Maintenance and Operation Responsibilit Privat / Public If Private, Maintenance Log Required: Yes No Financial Guarantees and Provided: Yes /cNa Liability Water Quality Type: asic Sens. Lake 1 Enhanced Basicm I Bog (include facility summary sheet) or Exem o. Landscape Management Plan: Yes / No Special Requirements as applicable)_ Area Specific Drainage Type: CDA 1 SDO / MDP / BP 1 LMP / Shared Fac.1 one Requirements Name: Floodplain/Floodway Delineation Type: Major 1 Minor 1 Exemption 1 one 100-year Base Flood Elevation (or range): Datum: Flood Protection Facilities Describe: Source Control Describe landuse: (comm./industrial landuse) Describe any structural controls: l 2005 Surface Water Design Manual 3 111/05 KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON, SURFACE WATER DESIGN MANUAL 61 STORMWATER FACILITY SUMMARY SHEET DDES Permit Number—L-0 SCO51 (provide one Stormwater Facility Summary Sheet per Natural Discharge Location) Overview: Project Name 6 A?T ate__ g /LJ3 AaC- Downstream Drainage Basins Major Basin Named Q002 Immediate Basin Name Flow Control: Flow Control Facility Name/Number dnEZE61720A.1 V,*V4.7' Facility Location D4.J Si TE If none, Flow control provided in regional shared facility (give location) No flow control required Exemption number General Facility Information: Type/Number of detention facilities: ponds vaults tanks Control Structure Location Type of Control Structure Size of Orifice/Restriction: No. 1 No. 2 No. 3 No. 4 Flow Control Performance Standard Live Storage Volume Number of Acres Served ¢l Number of Lots .3 Type/Number of infiltration facilities: ponds tanks trenches Depth Number of Orifices/Restrictions Volume Factor of Safety Dam Safety Regulations (Washington State Department of Ecology) Reservoir Volume above natural grade _ Depth of Reservoir above natural grade Facility Summary Sheet Sketch All detention, infiltration and water quality facilities must include a detailed sketch. 01 "x17" reduced size plan sheets may be used) 2005 Surface Water Design Manual 1/1/05 KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON, SURFACE WATER DESIGN MANUAL Water Quality: Type/Number of water quality facilitiesBMPs: biofiltration swale (regular/wet/ or continuous inflow) combined detention/wetpond (wetpond portion basic or large) combined detention/wetvault filter strip flow dispersion farm management plan landscape management plan oil/water separator (baffle or coalescing plate) catch basin inserts: Manufacturer sand filter (basic or large) sand filter, linear (basic or large) sand filter vault (basic or large) sand bed depth (inches) stormwater wetland storm filter wetpond (basic or large) wetvault Is facility Lined? If so, what marker is used above Liner? pre -settling pond pre -settling structure: Manufacturer high flow bypass structure (e.g., flow-splitter catch basin) source controls Design Information Water Quality design flow Water Quality treated volume (sandfilter) Water Quality storage volume (wetpool) Facility Summary Sheet Sketch All detention, infiltration and water quality facilities must include a detailed sketch. (l Vx 17" reduced size plan sheets may be used) 111105 2 2005 Surface Water Design Manual Flc-'UP-0 1 (&rxc) R3 KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON, SURFACE WATER DESIGN MANUAL TECHNICAL INFORMATION REPORT (TIR) WORKSHEET Oil Contro Treatment BMP: Maintenance Agreement: Yes No with whom? Other Drainage Structures Describe: WjAp 5TA'TI ON To 'FRaNA �' e-MNT1o1%l VP t1'T `ra t N to pw�Ea M41"A4a PW—tLATy p-T `C5TM We GOUr++j?A51' Part 13' EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL REQUIREMENTS MINIMUM ESC REQUIREMENTS MINIMUM ESC REQUIREMENTS DURING CONSTRUCTION -Clearing Limits AFTER CONSTRUCTION lam!/ Stabilize Exposed Surfaces Er Cover Measures �F3emove and Restore Temporary ESC Facilities 2 PPerimeter Protection Clean and Remove All Sift and Debris Ensure 2 Traffic Area Stabilization Operation of Permanent Facilities 4� Sediment Retention Flag Limits of SAO and open space ® Surface Water Control preservation areas ® Other ® Dust Control ® Construction Sequence Part 14� STORMWATER FACILITY DESCRIPTIONS Note: Includefacility Su mary and Sketch Control Type/ Descri tion Water QualityType/Description ,Flow E Detention ® Infiltration ® Regional Facility ® Shared Facility El Small Site BMPs L3 Other VPrVq El Biofiltration L3 Wetpool El Media Filtration El Oil Control El Spill Control LJ Small Site BMPs ® Other 2005 Surface Water Design Manual 4 111105 FtC-.uler-- 1 (CoNT) KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON, SURFACE WATER DESIGN MANUAL M TECHNICAL INFORMATION REPORT (TIR) WORKSHEET Part 15 EASEMENTS/TRACTS Part 16 STRUCTURAL ANALYSIS a -Drainage Easement 2 Access Easement Cast in Place Vault L) Retaining Wall Q Native Growth Protection Covenant L3 Rockery > 4' High ® Tract L) Structural on Steep Slope Other ® Other Part.17. SIGNATURE OF_.PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER ., 1, or a civil engineer under my supervision, have visited the site. Actual site conditions as observed were incorporated into this worksheqLaQd the attached Technical Information Report. To the best of my knowledge the inPrmatiopj06vi here is accurate. ?:Lll G SlghadlDate 2005 Surface Water Design Manual 1/1/05 F, c t, I,rz 1 (Cpt-AT; 54OF7r FLAT 10 PLA 1.94' HEL 1,0"0 B' � 20.81' o �LOT Er N«!S 7.420_ S. f. 6.50' m � N 8876'W W LOT 7a3s• 5.a0 N 8878'46" W 110" STORM I 15' STORM L- EASEMENT ! AND U71LI71ES EASEMENT 20' STORM 4 AND UTIL177ES • EASEMENT .a LOT J 5,040. S. t i I i to' STORM 6 EASEMENT "_--_---- --� 58.2070.21' 1�41' AS' FI URE cn C-1 Engineering Properties King County Area, Washington Classification Fragments Percent passing sieve number — Map symbol Depth USDA texture Liquid Plasticity and soil name Unified AASHTO >10 3-10 4 10 40 j 200 limit index Inches Inches In AgG: Alderwood 0-12 Gravelly sandy loam 12-27 Very cobbly sandy loam, Very gravelly loam, Very gravelly sandy loam 27-60 Very gravelly sandy loam USDANatural Resources Conservation Service Pct Pet Pcf GM, A-1, 0 0-5 55-70 50-65 35-55 20-30 15-25 NP-5 SM A-2 GM, A-1, 0 0-35 40-70 35-60 20-50 10-35 15-25 NP-5 SM A-2 GM, A-1, 0 0-35 40-70 35-60 20-50 10-35 15-25 NP-5 SM A-2 Tabular Data Version: 2 Tabular Data Version Date: 12/21/2005 This report shows only the Major soft in each map unit Others may wst Pagel of 1 13 Map Unit Description King County Area, Washington AgC Alderwood gravelly sandy loam, 6 to 15 percent slopes Setting Elevation: 50 to 800 feet Mean annual precipitation: 25 to 60 inches Mean annual air temperature: 48 to 52 degrees F Frost -free period: 180 to 220 days Composition Alderwood and similar soils: 95 percent Minor components: 5 percent Description of Alderwood Properties and Qualities Slope: 6 to 15 percent Depth to restrictive feature: 24 to 40 inches to Dense material Drainage Gass: Moderately well drained Capacity of the most limiting layer to transmit water (Ksat): Very low or moderately low (0.00 to 0.06 inlhr) Depth to water table: About 24 to 42 inches Frequency of flooding: None Frequency of ponding: None Calcium carbonate maximum: 0 percent Gypsum maximum: 0 percent Available water capacity: Very low (about 2.5 Inches) Interpretive Groups Land capability (non irrigated): 4s Typical Profile 0 to 12 inches: gravelly sandy loam 12 to 27 inches: very gravelly sandy loam 27 to 60 inches: very gravelly sandy loam Minor Components Norma Percent of map unit: 1 percent Landform: Depressions Bellingham Percent of map unit: 1 percent Landform: Depressions Seattle Percent of map unit: 1 percent Landform: Depressions Tukwila Percent of map unit: 1 percent Landform: Depressions Shalear Percent of map unit: 1 percent Landform: Depressions USA Natural Resources Tabular Data Version: 2 ��— Conservation Service Tabular Data Version Date: 12/21/2005 Page 1 of 2 This section dascrl:ss the soil series and map- ping units in the Kinq Coun,•1 1-e1. Each soil re Se asiumea teat what is stated about the soil series holds true for the mapping units in that series. Thus, to get full information about any one mapping unit, it is necessary to read 'both the description of the mapping unit and the description of -the soil series to which it belongs. An important part of the description of each soil series is the soil profile, that is, the sequence of layers from the surface downward to rock or other underlying material. Each series contains two descriptions of this profile. The first is brief and in terms familiar to the layman. The second, detailed and in technical terms, is for scientists, engineers, and others who need to make thorough and precise studies of soils. Unless it is otherwise stated, the colors given in the 'descriptions are thoso'of a moist soil. As mentioned in the section "How This Survey Was Made," not all mapping units are members of a soil series. Urban land, for example. does not belong to a soil series, but nevertheless, is listed in alphabetic order along with the soil series. Following the name of each mapping unit is a symbol in parentheses. This symbol identifies the mapping unit on the detailed soil map. Listed at the and of each description of a mapping unit is the capability unit and woodland group in which the mapping unit has been placed. The woodland desig- nation and the page for the description of each capability unit can be found by referring to the "Guide -to Mapping Units" at the back of this survey. The acreage and proportionate extent of each mapping unit are shown in table 1. Many of the terms used in describing soils can be found in the Glossary at the end of this survey, and more de- tailed information about the terminology and methods of soil mapping can be obtained from the Soil Survey Manual (19). Alderwood Series The Alderwood series is made up of moderately well drained soils -that have a weakly consolidated to strongly consolidated substratum at a depth of 24 to 40 inches. These soils are on uplands. They formed under conifers, in glacial deposits. Slopes are 0 to 70 percent. The annual precipitation is 3S to 60 inches, most of which is rainfall, between October and May. The mean anmsal air temperature is about 500 F. The frost -free season is ISO to 200 days. Elevation ranges from 100 to 800 feet. In a representative profile, the surface layer and subsoil are very dark brown, dark -brown, and grayish -brown gravelly sandy loam about 27 inches thick. The substratum is grayish -brown, weakly consolidated to strongly consolidated glacial till that extends to a depth of 60 inches and more. Alderwood soils art used f;r t_mbe-, pas.-r:, b:--:es. r n4 --r?s i-'. 4r' —t : t z!._. ''' • - Alderwood gravelly sandy loam 6 to I5 percent FA s��lo es . --This so s ro ng, as are ii;eglu ar in shape and range from 10 to about 600 rl .acres in size. Representative profile of Alderwood gravelly sandy loam, 6 to 1S percent slopes, in woodland, 450 feet east and 1,300 feet south of the north quarter corner of sec. 15, T. 24 N., R. 6 E.: Al--0 to 2 inches, very dark brown (10YR 2/2) gravelly sandy loam, dark grayish brown (10YR 4/2) dry; weak, fine, granular struc- ture; slightly hard, friable, nonsticky, nonplastic; many roots; strongly acid; abrupt, wavy boundary. 1 to 3 inches thick. 682--2 to 12 inches, dark -brown (10YR 4/3) gravelly sandy loam. brown (10YR 5/3) dry; moderate, medium, subangular blocky structure; slightly hard, friable, nonsticky, nonplastic; many roots; strongly acid; clear, wavy boundary. 9 to 14 inches thick. 83--12 to 27 inches, grayish -brown (2.SY S/2) gravelly sandy loam, Iight gray (2.SY 7/2) dry; many. medium, distinct mottles of Iight olive brown (2.SY 5/6); hard, friable, non - sticky, nonplastic; many roots; medium acid; abrupt, Wavy boundary. 12 to 23 inches thick. IIC--27 to 60 inches, grayish -brown (2.SY S/2), weakly to strongly consolidated till, light gray (2.SY 7/2) dry; common, medium, distinct mottles of light olive brown and yellowish brown (2.SY 5/6 and IOYR S/6); massive; no roots; medium acid. Many feet thick. The A horizon ranges from very dark brown to dark brown. The 8 horizon is dark brown, grayish brown, and dark yellowish brown. The consolidated C horizon, at a depth of 24 to 40 inches, is mostly grayish brown mottled with yellowish brown. Some layers in the C horizon slake in water. In a few areas, there is a thin, gray or grayish -brown A2 horizon. In most areas. this horizon has been destroyed through logging operations. Soils included with this, soil in mapping make up no more than 30 percent of the total acreage. Some areas are up to 3 percent the poorly drained Norma, Bellingham, Seattle, Tukwila, and Shalcar soils; some are up to S percent the very gravelly Everett and Neilton soils; and some are up to 1S percent Alderwood soils that have slopes more gentle or steeper than 6 to 15 percent. Some areas in New; castle Hills are 2S percent Beausite soils, some northeast of Duvall are as much as 25 percent OvaIl soils, and some in the vicinity of Dash Point are 10 percent Indianola and Kitsap soils. Also included are small areas of Alderwood soils that have a gravelly loam surface layer and subsoil. ... ,_.. rn . .m UT, aoct3 pone :racs a___-,' :.:a ; r.-)1.za..- s.:os:_.- rum where they tend to mat on the surface. Some roots enter he s-1 st-:%= throuw- crack:. Wa_or and the hazard of erosion is moderate. This soil is used for timber, pasture, berries, and row crops, and for urban development. Capability unit IVe-2; woodland group 3dl. Alderwood eravellv.sandy loam. 0 to 6 aercent slvpvai IL^50) .--ZAls DW&A as i,G4LtY ivrci o,a.. un u sting. it is similar to Alderwood gravelly sandy loam, 6 to 1S percent slopes, but in places its surface layer is 2 to 3 inches thicker. Areas are irregular in shape and range from 10 acres to slightly more than 600 acres in size: Some areas are as much as is percent included Norma, Bellingham, Tukwila, and Shalcar soils, all of which are poorly drained; and souse areas in the vicinity of Enumclaw are as much as 10 percent Buckley soils. Runoff is slow, and the erosion hazard is slight. This Alderwood soil is used for timber, pasture, berries, and row crops, and for urban development. Capability unit IVe-2; woodland group W . Alderwood gravelly sandy loam 15 to 30 Rercent slopes gD) .--Depth to the substratum in trils s8 vwithin short distances, but is commonly about 40 inches. Area's are elongated and range from 7 to about 250 acres in size. Soils included with this soil in mapping make up no more than 30 percent of the total acreage. Some areas are up to 25 percent Everett soils that have slopes of Ato 30 percent, and some areas are up`tq 2 percent Bellingham, Norma, and Sebttle soils, which are in depressions. Some areas, especially on Squak'Mountain, in Newcastle Hills, and north of Tiger Mountain, are 2S percent Beausite and Qvall soils. Beausite soils are underlain by sandstone, and Ovall soils by andesite. Runoff is medium, and the erosion hazard is severe. The slippage potential is moderate, This Alderwood soil is used mostly for timber. Some areas on the lower parts of slopes are used for pasture. Capability unit Vie-2; woodland group 3d1. Alderwood and Kitsap soils very ste (AkF).-- This mapping unit is about 50 percent Alderwood gravelly sandy loam and 25 percent Kitsap silt loam. Slopes are 2S to 70 percent. Distribution of the soils varies greatly within short distances. About 15 percent of some mapped areas is an included, unnamed, very deep, moderately coarse textured soil; and about 10 percent of some areas is a very deep, coarse -textured Indianola soil. Drainage and permeability vary. Runoff is rapid to very rapid, and the erosion hazard is severe to very severe. The slippage potential is severe. These soils are used for timber. Capability unit VIle-1; woodland group 2dl. 10 Arents, Alderwood material consists a: 3ife -,;od soils that have been so i ° sturbad vhrouin many similar features. The upper part of the soil, to a depth of 20 to 40 inches, is brown to dark - brown gravelly sandy loam. Below this is a grayish - brown, consolidated and impervious substratum. Slopes generally range from 0 to 15,percenr. These soils are used for urban development. Arents Alderwood material. 0 to 6 rcent slopes (Am . -- n many areas s soil is level , as a result of shaping during construction for urban facilities. Areas are rectangular in shape and range from 5 acres to about 400 acres in size. Representative profile of Arents, Alderwood material, 0 to 6 percent slopes, in an urban area, 1,300 feet west and 350 feet south of the northeast corner of sec, 23, T. 25 N., R. S E. 0 to 26'Anches, dark -brown (10YR 4/3) gravelly sandy loam, pale brown (10YR 6/3) dry; massive; slightly hard, very friable, non - sticky, nonplastic; many roots; medium acid; abrupt, smooth boundary. 23 to 29 inches thick. 26 to 60 inches, grayish -brown (2.SY S12) weakly consolidated to strongly consolidated glacial till, light brownish gray (2.5Y 6/2) dry; common, medium, prominent mottles of yellowish brown (10YR 5/6) moist; massive; no roots; medium acid. Many feet thick. The upper, very friable part of the soil extends to a depth of 20 to 40 inches and ranges from dark grayish brown to dark yellowish brown. Some areas are up to 30 percent included soils that are similar to this soil material, but either shallower or deeper over the compact substratum; and some areas are s to 10 percent very gravelly Everett soils -and sandy Indianola soils. This Arents, Alderwood soil is moderately well drained. Permeability in the upper, disturbed soil material is moderately rapid to moderately slow, depending on its compaction during construction. - The substratum is very slowly permeable. Roots penetrate to and tend to mat on the surface of the consolidated substratum. Some roots enter the substratum through cracks, water moves on top of the substratum in winter. Available water capacity is low. Runoff is slow, and the erosion hazard is slight. This soil is used for urban development. Ca- pability unit IVe-2; woodland group 3d2, Arents, Alderwood material, 6 to 15 percent slopes s soil has convex slopes. Areas are rectangular in shape and range from 10 acres to about 450 acres in size. U U It UO U6/3U/ZU06 IU:U3 FAA ZU5J3U5lUU YK1NUEbS TUUMS 42JUIU Account Number 008700=0133-01 it Engineer FND COtJC MON fND CON tN CASE 0.69 N SE 166TH ST WID C � a65 w OF PLAT Loct� w/o ca {4/2003) N 887$'46" W if4.23(P) {4/2003 PLA 1.54' HEL N Max# im—Loa-T— 5.01' I LOT' , EX. HOUSE 7,420. S. f. 6.50' I I N 8876'46' W LOT 2 5.586. S. f. k 10" STORM I EASEMENT I I I . I 10• STORM I EASEMENT 5&20' 20.81' CIO f I I fA A N W76 46 W 1 1.5 STORM L ._ AND U IX I DES EASEMENT 3 LOT .3 7a21' 5.00' _ 20STORM AND UTIL177ES '~ EASEMENT 08/30/2006 10:02 FAX 206336610 PRINCESS 7•UUKS QU11 !.7 NGY SHORT PLAT LOT CLOSURES Lot name! 1 August 28, 2006 North: 9968.9184 East: 50311.8241 Line Course: N 88-16-46 W Length: 129,.31 North: 9972.7709 East: 50243.5720 Line Course: S 01-45-38 W Length: 40.60 North: 9932.1901 East: 50242.3246 Line Course: S 88-16-46 E Length: 50.00 North: 9930.6688 East: 50292.3021 Line Course: S 01-45-38 W Length: 29.21 North: 9902.4921 East: 50291.4354 Line Course: S 8B-16-46 E Length: 7B.36 North: 9900.1394, East: 50369.7601 Line Course: N 01-43-14 E Length: 68.81 North: 996B.9184 East: 50371.8261 Perimeter: 394.29 Area: 7,420. s.f. 0.17 acres Mapcheck Closure - (Uses listed courses, radii, and deltas) Error Closure: 0.0020 Course: S 88--46-09 E Error North;-0.00004 East: 0.00196 Precision 1.: 201,000.88 Lot name: 2 North: 9930.6889 East: 50292.2992 Tine Course: N 98-16-46 W Length: 50.00 North: 9932.1902 East: 50242.3211 Line Course: 5 01-45-30 W Length: 100.00 North: 9832.2374 East: 50239.2495 Line Course: S 88-16-46 E Length: 58.20 North: 9830.4899 - East: 50297.4232 Line Course: N 01-43-14 E Length: 71.79 North: 9902.2475 East: 50299.5787 Line Course: N 88-16-46 W Length:-8.15 North: 9902.4922 East: 50291.4324 Line Course: N 01-45-38 E Length: 26.21 North: 9930.6809 East: 50292.2991 Perimeter: 316.35 Area: 5,586. s.f. 0.12 acres Mapcheck Closure - (Uses lasted courses, radii, and deltas) Error Closure: 0.0001 Course: N 79-54-25 W Error North: 0.00002 East:=0.00012 Precision 1: 2,632,931.91 Page 1 of 2 9 073/30/2006, 10„ 02 FAX 20633UdIUU _ _ _ rKjRktsba iuumb NGY SHORT PLAT LOT CLOSURES ---------------------------------- August 28, 2006 Lot name: 3 North: 9902.2475 East: 50299.5798 Line Course: 3 01-43-14 W Length: 71.79 North: 9B30.4899 East: 50297.4243 Line Coursei S 88-16-46 E Length: 70.21 North: 9B28.3818 East: 50367.6026 Line Course: N 01-43-14 E Length: 71.79 North: 9900.1394 East.: 50369.7581 Line Course: N 88-16-46 W Length: 70.21 North: 9902.2415 East: 50299.5790 Perimeter: 284.00 Area: 5,040. s.f. 0.11 acres Mapcheck Closure - (Ekes listed courses, radii, and deltas) Error Closure: 0.0000 Course: S 90-00-00 E Error North: 0.00000 East: 0.00000 Precision 1: 204,000,000.00 Lot name: TOTAL North: 9972.7710 East: 50243.5690 Line Course: 5 01-45-38 W Length: 140.60 North: 9832.2374 East: 50239.2494 Line Course: S 88-16-46 E Length: 128.41 North: 9028.3819 East: 50367.6015 Line Course: N 01-43-14 E Length: 140.60 North: 9968.9185 East: 50371.6230 Line Course: N 88-16-46 W Length: 126.31 North: 9972.7710 East: 50243.5708 Perimeter: 537.92 Area: 18,047. s.f. 0.41 acres Mapcheck Closure -- (Uses listed courses, radii, and deltas) Error Closure: 0.0018 Course: 9 69-20-41 E Error North:--0.00002 East: 0.00104 Precision 1: 291,670.46 Page 2 of 2 Project: Ngy Short Plat Client: Teng Ngy CEI No.: 04-32001 Not to scale IL�l�J��`�� Date: September 23, 2006 Prepared By: M. Olson Page q 14201 NE 200`h Street, Suite 200 Phone: (425) 487-1732 Woodinville, WA 98072 (250) 250-7306 Email: cei@cornerstone-engr.com (EO )CRi7 NeRsirONE Fax: (425)487-1734 N E E R I N 6, I N C. Web: www,comerston"ngr.corn M Project: Ngy Short Plat Date: September 23, 2006 Client: Teng Ngy Prepared By: M. Olson CEl No.: 04-32001 Page IV 2.0 CONDITIONS AND REQUIREMENTS SUMMARY Ngy Short Plat lies within the King County jurisdiction, and therefore is subject to the King County design standards. Preliminary short plat approval was granted by King County on June 18, 2004, with final short plat approval contingent upon the following requirements per the conditions of preliminary approval: 1) Compliance with Title 19A. 2) Surface Water Management (KCC 9). Full drainage review (Section 1,1,2,3 SWDM). 3) Health (KCC 13) — Exempt from KCHD review, but subject to requirements of sewer/water district. 4) Road Standards (KCC 14) — Full compliance with 1993 KC Road Standards, Ordinance 11187. 5) Building & Construction Standard (Title 16) — Grading — comply with KCC 16.82. 6) Zoning Code (KCC 21A) — Density & Dimensions, street trees, landscaping & financial guarantees. 7) Road Mitigation Payment System fee must be paid. 8) Subdivision is exempt from SEPA. 9) Fire engineering approval has been granted with no additional conditions. A drainage adjustment is required to pump storm water discharge from the southwest corner of the property to the open ditch along 105'' Avenue Southeast as a King County Recommendation. 14201 NE 20CP Street, Suite 200 Phone: (425) 487-1732 Woodinville, WA 98072 (250) 250-7306 Email: cei@comerstone-engr.com (E�� Nr=; S9r'ONB Fax: (425) 487-1734 N pINEE HIN G. INC- Web: www.cornerstone-engr.com Project: Ngy Short Plat Date: September 23, 2006 Client: Teng Ngy Prepared By: M. Olson CEI No.: 04-32001 Page 'M 3.0 OFFSITE ANALYSIS On Wednesday November 03, 2004, an Upstream and Downstream Analysis were performed for the site. The weather was partly cloudy and approximately 55° F. No rainfall had occurred in the previous 24-hours and no runoff was observed leaving the site. . 3.1 Upstream Analysis From site visits, USGS mapping and King County MAP — Stormwater mapping for the area, it is apparent that what was once the tributary upstream area for the site is now separated from it by 105th Avenue SE and the municipal ditch/culvert drainage system along the east (uphill) side of the road. Therefore an upstream basin for the site no longer exists other than the minor runoff from the western half of 105th Avenue SE. 3.2 Downstream Analysis Current site drainage consists of southwesterly sheet flow from 105'h Avenue SE dispersed through vegetation and exiting the parcel at the natural low point along the southwest property line onto the adjacent residential properties. Downstream flow continues through the adjacent residential grass covered parcels and into an open drainage ditch along 104th Avenue SE where it flows south toward the municipal closed pipe system at Benson Drive South. Because the current site drainage at the natural discharge location in the southwest corner of the property is undesirable, the county has requested a drainage adjustment to collect the storm water runoff from the site in the southwest corner and pump it back up to the county owned ditch system along 105th Avenue SE as part of the preliminary short plat approval. The drainage adjustment would consist of an on -site underground detention vault with restricted outflow to a pump station where the runoff would be pumped up to a new curb inlet as part of the right of way curb and gutter street improvements required for the project. The curb inlet would drain from a new 12-inch concrete pipe culvert across 105th Avenue SE to an existing King County catch basin and into the series of open ditches and 12-inch culverts at five driveways in a south direction for approximately 435-feet to a large open grated manhole structure near the intersection of 105`h Avenue SE and SE 172"d Street. The manhole outfall appears to drain south approximately 130-feet into a closed conduit storm drain system that runs along Benson Drive South (Highway 515). The field inspection was terminated at the intersection of 105th Avenue SE and SE 172"d Street. 14201 NE 200'h Street, Suite 200 Phone: (425) 487-1732 Woodinville, WA 98072 (250) 250-7306 Email: cei@cornerstone-engr.com (EO CC]r-iNErFt5lr'ONE Fax: (425) 487-1734 6 N I N C E R I N Q, I N C. .c Web: wwwomerstone-engr,aom y4- .oLl � kTA pa vtA Ayr-_, rip VA . bt;-� WN �.� :2�■a'.` �■;R��■'/� f�|��■'! .: ►■`¥�fk �/;`��■:`§ . 9 :�■;~a��� z �44`��■��Q .�; � 2 a�t`�¥,1\■ \ �! :��, . . \ \ i �} | \ / \ a�f2��■1`£ }�*�J�■a�` - .�42��■:�\ '�a; ) , \ '*}y . ; j � � }f\�■).§ � ! / `� - : \ }4J «£■:�z ) J2 K:2^� - ��■\) ! �K � ¥4 �#■�%. - ' .. / � Project: Ngy Short Plat Client: Teng Ngy CEI No.: 04-32001 Date: September 23, 2006 Prepared By: M. Olson Page 1W 4.0 FLOW CONTROL & WATER QUALITY FACILITY ANALYSIS & DESIGN The flow control and water quality requirements are per the 1998 King County Surface Water Design Manual (KCSWDM). Although the site is located within a Level 2 Flow Control Area as defined by the Flow Control Applications Map, it does not meet the threshold for application of the Level 2 flow control standard as shown on page 1-33 of the manual. Therefore the project will be designed for the "Level One" flow control standard. 4.1 Existing Site Hydrology There is currently one single family home on the Teng Ngy short plat site that will remain on the proposed Lot #1 as shown on the plat drawings. The slightly sloped parcel land cover consists of natural grass and pasture -like ground cover. Existing site drainage consists of sheet flow dispersed through vegetation to the natural discharge location in the southwest corner of the parcel. Existing Site Statistics: Impervious Area = 0.044 Acres Pervious Area = 0.366 Acres Total Site Area = 0.41 Acres 4.2 Developed Site Hydrology In the developed condition, the property will provide 3 detached single family dwelling units, with associated access driveways and utilities. The single family units will contain roof and footing drain systems, which will be connected to an underground storm drainage system. Yard drainage will flow overland to a catch basin at the natural discharge location near the southwest corner of the property and enter the underground storm drainage treatment and detention system. All storm water will be collected through the catch basin structure which will contain a filtration devise prior to entering the detention vault for temporary storage and released via an orifice sized to control the outflow rate to the existing plus the 10-year detained flow to the duplex pumping station. The storm water will then be pumped to a curb inlet near the southeast corner of the property along 1051" Avenue SE and into the municipal drainage system via a new 12-inch concrete culvert pipe across the road. 14201 NE 20& Street, Suite 200 Phone: (425) 487-1732 Woodinville, WA 98072 (250) 250-7306 Email: cei@cornerstone-engr.com COe�NErRN 6Ek 1N [3. 1N C.S-ihONE Fax: (425) 487-1734 E NGI Web: www,cornerstone-engr,com (EO Project: Ngy Short Plat Date: September 23, 2006 Client: Teng Ngy Prepared By: M. Olson CEl No.: 04-32001 Page _ !-'' Developed Site Statistics: Lot #1 Impervious Area = Lot #1 Pervious Area = Lot #2 Impervious Area = Lot #2 Pervious Area = Lot #3 Impervious Area = 0.06 Acres 0.11 Acres 0.10 Acres 0.03 Acres 0.08 Acres (includes the Private Access Tract) Lot #3 Pervious Area = 0.03 Acres Total Site Area = 0.41 Acres 4.3 Design Standards for Water Quality Stonnwater treatment features for this project site are to be selected using the KCSWDM Basic Water Quality Treatment Menu per the King County Water Qualifications Applications Map. Per "Exemptions from Core Requirement #8" page 1-50 of the KCSWDM, this project is exempt from the requirement to provide a formal water quality facility under the Surface Area Exemption because the property is: a.) Adding less than 5000 S.F. of new PGIS. b.) Creating less than 5000 S.F. of continuous PGIS in any combination as part of the redevelopment project. c.) Adding or modifying less than 1 acre of continuous PGPS. This project proposes to add approximately 2500 S.F. of total PGIS including the PAT and driveways. The total site area is 0.41 acres; therefore the total area of continuous PGPS is less than 1 acre. 4.4 Flow Control System Level One Flow control for the project will be achieved through the use of a riser type flow restrictor devise at the detention vault outfall control structure to limit the outfall to 2 and 10 year peak pre - developed condition flow rates. The structure will be sited near the natural site outfall location, although the outfall will be pumped to an existing drainage system at 105tt' Avenue through a proposed drainage adjustment as part of this application. The hydrological model, and detention facility design was performed as follows: Step 1: Determine the target release rate for the entire site: The entire project site was modeled in the pre -developed condition to estimate the total allowable runoff from the downstream point of compliance. The existing conditions were entered into KCTRS, and peak flows were generated. This was used to ensure compliance with Level 1 flow control standards. 14201 NE 2000 Street, Suite 200 Phone: (425) 487-1732 Woodinville, WA 98072 (250) 250-7306 Email: cei@cornerstone-engr.com (EO CORIVER5IrONE Fax: (425) 487-1734 Web: www.cornerstone-cDgr.com E N 6 N E E R, N O. 1 N G. Project: Ngy Short Plat Date: September 23, 2006 Client: Teng Ngy Prepared By: M. Olson CEI No.: 04-32001 Page Step 2: Determine the developed runoff rates: The developed runoff rates for this basin were calculated so they could be routed through the proposed detention structure. Step 3: Design the detention facility to provide adequate amount of detention volume required: A detention structure was sized to provide the adequate storage necessary to meet the discharge requirements. Step 4: Size the detention system orifice restrictor plate: A detention structure outfall restrictor plate was sized based on the allowable outfall flows to comply with the Level 1 standards. 14201 NE 20e Street, Suite 200 Phone: (425) 487-1732 Woodinville, WA 98072 (250) 250-7306 Email: cei@comerstone-engr.com p COaNEFtSVONE Fax: (425) 487-1734 EN Gl NEE"I 1413. 1 N C. Web: www.commtone-engr.com Project: Ngy Short Plat Date: September 23, 2006 CIient: Teng Ngy Prepared By: M. Olson CEI No.: 04-32001 Page , I I i EYE@] 14201 NE 201r Street, Suite 200 Phone: (425) 487-1732 Woodinville, WA 98072 (250) 250-7306 Email: cei@cornerstone-engr.com �O CORNER5VONE Fax: (425) 487-1734 EN GIN [ L R I Nil, IHG. Web: www.comerstone-engr.com Project: Ngy Short Plat Date: September 23, 2006 Client: Teng Ngy Prepared By: M. Olson CEI No.: 04-32001 _ page .,�__... 3' Step 1: Determine the target release rate for the entire site: Pre -Developed Site — Input Parameters �� 1CCRTS Till Forest 8.00 acres Till Pasture 0'.41 acres Till Grass 8.88 acres Outwash Forest 0.00 acres- Outwash Pasture 8.88 acres Outwash Grass 0.08'acres Wetland 0.08 acres Impervious 8.80 acres Total Area 0.41 acres Scale Factor 1.08 Hourly Reduced Time Series: Compute Time Series Modify User Input Pre -Developed Site — Flow freguencA Analysis 14201 NE 20CP Street, Suite 200 Phone: (425) 487-1732 Woodinville, WA 98072 (250) 250-7306 Email: cei@cornerstone-engr.com (EO �FaF� NEr�5irC3NE Fax: (425) 487-i734 N E EA 1 V4 a. INC. Web: www.cornerstone-engr.com Project: Ngy Short Plat Date: September 23, 2006 Client: Teng Ngy Prepared By: M. Olson CEI No.: 04-32001 Page 38 Step 2: Determine the developed runoff rates: Develo ed Site — Input Parameters KCR7S —bane use Nummary Till Forost 0.00 acres Till Pasture. 0.00 acres Till Grass 0:17 acres Outwash�Forest 0.00 acres Outwash Pasture 0.00 acres Outwash Grass 0.00 acres Wetland 8AM acres Imperuious 0.24 acres Total Area 0.41 acres Scale Factor : 1.00 Hourly Reduced Time Series: compute Tine series Modify User Input Developed Site — Flow frequenga Anal sis 14201 NE 20e Street, Suite 200 Phone: (425) 487-1732 Woodinville, WA 98072 (250) 250-7306 Email: cei@cornerstone-engr.com (EO )cm NsaS'VONE Fax: (425) 487-1734 N CCAING, INC. Web: www.comerstone-engr.com l ir�� 7 ,try 11h�rutnt6nl r,(:i,on f } ti_ i 1 1;y: Ai grn1: i,iin I` rnlc TAnlc 1,�ri1�iL_'1i: G4 _ #�1; }J'Ircti;yt '',fri}•��Ic: ll�j,Lli: f:.k1F1 1'1; Se �y�: E1 F'Ir:�al;i,t,lti: F3.[3N fe 51;o1.Zrlt: UultgT1e 2605. c:tt. ft: Riscl D allmevcr' 1.2.00 in[:ltc:; Numl�c;r rif ni,i,l'r.e: : � ... Fit1.1, 141-'ad Y.ilit, OI .i,l`;.r <: 11 Ht:;i,yltt: I) .;jJgi;t r,l Di,;;clt tryE: }li.rtnct;cr Cfl;) Cin CCR i 11.1i1.1 N.:;1 U.Ilt,t 2 5.m;6 11_! 11 N.OW? 4-11 Tnp.Nutr11 Ue.j.r: Nollc itt Q:f lt2ii' H t.i.roy cktryo None E R,C 11, 1,1; DUf t:InlL flt Z.1v iQ 11 U,NI_ t1.111 W_ 11_ool II.t"M; N_1141 "..W Ulu?. 41. U_NOW N_UM 0.00 UM N . J 13 . N MOO 0 Ei111, N _ 00 0.114 U.N4 .. Ft. F1_NE�N t [1:0 F _NN ONN.1,4� N. TWO MAD? N_11FA 11.26 006 0. 0-000 N.I104 N_N0 N. 17 pj? N. N_Noo FC004 Fj_oFI F1A8 QAw 0. 0-000 U_11Uti 0.014 0.50 U,!;Ef 0. U..0110 N_ous 6.60 11_ I N_61 50. 1•i.1101 14-I1fif {i_N11 U,72 IOU. 0.002 TOM V1_UFI 11.ii3 11..8 f3 1, ,f . "Am 11_011G 11.111'I 0.9h 2.N;3. 0_00!1 N_41Fi7 woo l;.11!i 1..t1'i 25 , (1.t1kc 0.,fjov F1.Nb 1,,;16 509- U•U07 N_F11iH 0.00 L -. 1 _ ! •1 _ _ -., _ .: 1•_ -fi• :1;,ci�� - .y �j,U,. 91`f.- 1,..17 ;I,.49 471 _ 0.011 11,009 11.�10 J,.09 1..Gq 50. !_1_0i,l 0-009 11.NN 1 .'11, 1, _ m S $1, . 0.013 0.009 0,00 1..t, Ili%. fy;1?. 0.015 N.UI:U 0-01 1 _'13 1, O') 3 . 4i . (11,G 0 t 01. U 41, 0" 1.04 l _'t1l 2141). Ni.i11.-7 11,N1.11 11.111i $116. k#.01'8 U, 1010 11,N11 146 1.?{; i1f3'l.. 41.F12N 0.911, N.NN N_N2_,1 li,t%IJ 11.f111 1.4R ?.._4H 776- It_N2.2 11_111.1, 0. MI `l ' 5' A Wli2_ 11-U14 U_111"1, 0.011 2,yo 2-Al Jmg. 0.U2`-, U.01.2 y.c1N l _ul 1... ,} 1:I,4!-,. N_N'l.f 11.012 41_00 ?.91 2.92 1`I.N2_ li_0aH 0."12 WHO 1 '2. s N . U - N 1'1 0.012 0.110 3..14 3.1.4 1311. 0.1130 11.Ili3 !1_UFI Hq; UM 1370. N_U=1.1, 0,41 3 0.00 �.. 1.-.tlf .. _.. I .<If5_. __.... _112.G-._...... 7� 7 'fl.: ;i A Oil 013 no U. M 3.69 3.6v 0.03E 0.014 3 .81 3.81 1649. M-018 TOM 4.00 9A2 3.92 1702. 0-019 PAU11 0.011 4.M3 1755. 0.040 PLOT W."O AM 1007- 0.041 0,011 0100 US ins". W.043 W MI 5 W. 00 4.36 (1-014 kmlls @.no 4., 47 4. 47 045 FLPQ OW MY 0 046 P 400 Woo 43V my. M147 Vq 01 S M.No 100 4-00 2100 WHIM IMS WHO 4.91 4.91 2119. 0.019 0.01E RAO 510? 9102 MY& 0.050 U_ Oj 6 W.Wo S.11 SA3 2236. MASI W01,6 0-00 5.24 501 227H. 0=2 W MI 6 0.00 5AS WS 231 n. 0 - 0.00 s .4(, !". 46 2357. O."Sl 0.016 MAH FXH 5.50 2371. 0-054 0017 11-09 S.51 I.St 1374- 0.0177 0. mo S-51 QS2 1379. owss o.vto Won vp 5.53 23PI. 0.005 0.010 WHO 554 S&I 2305- 0.05S w"J" 0-00 QNS SAS 23813. moss 0.019 myo S.66 5.16 2424. M.USG O.Mmo U-00 I ; - ?? !" . ? 0 W.; (i 5i - 8 8 Ay '?489. R.023 11 on 5.99 99 2!')1.8 0 - 8: 0 - 0 -1 0. On I'l, 2 5 4.(, 0 K8 0 - W1S �.22 0.?2 2S69_ 0!;9 0 - 92�; 0.00 GA3 6.33 Any. 0.059 0-026 0.00 6.14 6.11 Mul. 0.060 M.427 TOO 6-50 G.50 2605. U.Mcm 11.02Y HMO GAH 1166 2605- 0-060 0-336 0.011 ,.py 600 0051 0.001 gAgg N,011 ,A-. -6 An VAR .2 M , _... -•11 . H C, 0 __�,j 1. G't 6 1 ti 17 ,111V V �.-o I i 'ago Wout Calc hunge Elev <Q;-Ft) (WIT) 0 � is0.11. 6. 53 6.0 260s. 0.069 0 7Op 0..9 ') 6.51 6-51 205. . 0-060 3 0 wo? 0-M 0.03 (.41, 6. 41 2S97. MAGO 6. (in �-w N m w 0M2 Is f; 6 !_) . G Ch 2423. 0 05C) 11 - F11!' A."xAx-?l 0.02 .1) 29 s . 2 9 mn H HO 0.05 0.01 0.01. 1150 YSH IS37, 0 0 3 'U" 0; 06 0.01. &V 2.41 q4t. P. Uzi). t.196 0 - 0 t I _W 1 . q!; 704 4116 _'.PE-1 i (1 :m f ..I Me K it 1�1"'_. a. nt'.- _'� ; 1"i1 l 1k'tl0 pip" ' "cid ie Dimiacter Di;�,clmrju 1) j c% fv_� t, t, v g'P5 04o ( (e 1:"" 7 < i(s) 0 A1.0 N,57 0 m 91b, "�' ' $ 0_039 _14. 0 k, 0I NMI SUBMERSIBLE PUMP i='\11�Iil �s CONTROL CENTER •, TIME COMPLETE ANSWER TO YOUR DOMESTIC PUMPING REQUIREMENTS... Norweco's versatile and economical line of pumping stations hold the key to your domestic fluid handling needs. Designed and manufactured with the highest degree of reliability, these pre-engineered pumping stations are the ideal answer for influent pumping, effluent pumping, timed dosing, volume dosing, pressure sewers, collection systems or distribution systems. Available with a comprehensive list of options, simplex and duplex pumping stations combine ease of installation with single -source convenience. Homeowners, engineers, designers, contractors and public health officials recognize Norweco pumping stations as the most dependable and cost-effective solution for domestic wastewater and stormwater applications. MULTIPLE CONTROL OPTIONS FOR A WIDE RANGE OF PUMPING APPLICATIONS... A variety of pre -wired electrical controls can be supplied for use with each pumping station. ' To increase functionality and insure compliance with local regulations, timed and volume dosing options are available with various alarm and component configurations. Control centers include a clearly labeled terminal strip with individual connections for all system wiring. The controls are manufactured entirely from UL listed or recognized components and are contained within a NEMA rated, weatherproof enclosure. DESIGN AND INSTALLATION FLEXIBILITY TO ACCOMMODATE ANY SITE CONDITION... To simplify installation, the corrosion resistant, polyethylene basin is supplied with the outlet connection factory installed. The inlet connection is field installed with a sealing grommet to secure a watertight connection of the piping. The location of the inlet connection can be positioned to accommodate variable sewer line depths and site specific conditions. For deeper installations, riser sections can be installed with a sealing gasket and compression clamp to increase basin height and maintain access from grade. Ring sections can be'installed below the inlet connection to increase holding capacity. This flexibility makes Norweco pumping stations ideal for new installations or to retrofit existing systems. The simplex pumping station is an economical and reliable solution to numerous low flow wastewater or stormwater requirements. Offering a complete equipment package to contractors and homeowners, the basic model is a low cost, easily installed pumping station that requires minimal maintenance. Typical applications for the simplex pumping station include septic tank effluent pumping (STEP) systems, community systems, cluster systems, sand filters, dosed or pressurized disposal fields, drainage sumps and other residential or small commercial systems. o Quick and easy to install — the complete equipment package including basin, pump, electrical controls and pre-cut piping can be easily delivered to the jobsite for fast and efficient installation. a Simplified single float control — dependable mechanical float switch activates the pump cycle at a predetermined liquid level and de -energizes the pump when the cycle ends. a Heavy-duty, energy efficient pump — corrosion resistant design provides reliable, long-term performance, even in the harshest environments. O Optional audible and visual alarms provide system protection — in the event of High water within the basin, an alarm light and buzzer are automatically activated. �. i•VA 'd�'" 4. `yn-,. -aor a r .%4�'`r•^'.' ?a:'J., DUPAL : P ` MP E-QIPMVIENI E The duplex pumping station handles the demands of increased flow and high capacity applications while providing the enhanced reliability of a second pump. Both pumps are controlled by a standard control center and discharge through a single outlet connection. Multiple control center configurations and electro-mechanical options are available to meet a variety of pumping requirements. Typical applications for the duplex pumping station include domestic wastewater, stormwater, pressure sewers, sequential dosing or small municipal collection systems. o Exceptional performance and protection — duplex pumps increase pumping station delivery in response to surge flows, while providing the security of a backup pump. o Durable and easily installed control center— automatically alternates lead and lag pump operation, providing equal pump wear and enhanced reliability. 0 Fully accessible from grade — all equipment and controls can be safely maintained without entering the basin. Routine maintenance takes only a few minutes and requires no special tools or confined space entry equipment. 0 Adjustable dose control with automatic backup — two float switches interface to initiate a predetermined dose at each pump cycle. Additional float switches are provided to automatically activate the backup pump and high water alarm. SCI 03 113 HP effluent pump for low flow t residential pumping applications. �k 0 66 GPM max., 32 ft. TDH max. �- 0 115 volt, single phase MODEL SC104 � 4110 HP effluent pump for higher volume residential and commercial applications. } ` 0 80 GPM max. 32 ft. TDH max. 0 115 volt, single phasefeff In - - MODEL I=I8'I Q5 4 112 HP multi -stage pump for pressurized disposal of filtered effluent. a a 28 GPM max., 125 ft. TDH max. o 115 volt, single phase 'C C MODEL SC105 112 HP effluent pump for high head, r stormwater or STEP applications. t o 57 GPM max., 80 ft. TDH max. -` 0 115 volt, single phase MODEL G8320 2 HP grinder pump for raw wastewater or pressure sewer systems. 0 40 GPM max., 105 ft. TDH max. 0 230 volt, single phase ■n�r�..�■■■■■■■■■■■■ ■■■■■■■�►���■■■■■■ ■■■■■■■■■�--._■■ ■` ■■■■■■■■■■■�\ ■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■ L------------ SUPERIOR FLUID HANDLING SOLUTIONS FOR ANY JOB... A complete pump line is available to meet all your domestic pumping requirements. Submersible effluent pumps may be supplied to distribute treated wastewater to pressurized disposal fields, spray systems, drip systems and high head applications. Grinder pumps are available for pressure sewer or other raw wastewater installations. Each pump is carefully engineered to deliver maximum performance in its chosen application, providing exceptional value and years of trouble -free service. L U.S. Gotions per Minute �, a. '4�a�% � h� - .• o c•i' n .c��;.Q .U�v �. .a Sv. t�,,��7tx.,: ' ,OTHER EQUMENT ROM! MOR"dii71. . �r A" _ SINGUI Alir*HDME,TEAT'MENT,'O Aii, " * k Y s II Iridlvirfual'ttorri+swast6t am*e'ttiethwntisyatems:fonuseiininon-s&mred;suburbanAndniral,an f+torwlaaa tiN�Ul?iIR� plants.autamattCalty reduebfall:fitiusefwld wastawateeto aldear, odorless, . effluant,Ip ji is :,hours. �ireatirient ca(iei%W `upito 1,5D01GPD. r ODUL'A�R WASTEWA�iERTREA7�111EwPLANTS Far semi mer 61,appjicalj*ns1;50D4o,100,0001GPDi Tankware,precast commle.o6veredi n_t ; &hvatvantxedmi tat gratingI MODutAIR'eQuipm nt ls�factoryfassembled a6dlested; Idea1',far -small sutidiiiisions., isCtoiies, aci Dafs,'shoppind;cent8n3, etC: v r TRAVALAIW WASTEWAT,ER7REATmttt ' PLA-oTs FeatridnglNbrweeos'exdusivelTRAVAL-AIR.scudge,retum and-surfar skiirrOiing system. Fle) iblw lnl"iljn-.cdpable of/servno:COMY6uhfts,of`10PDO•people, ,Automatic.sludge,cDlletxion snit` - ietulnt,0T iplit0y:Wirr 1hWelhapper S&4p- i ' 11121I04CIN0C'9'i►9iSTEWJd►TERMAWA'GEME NTSYSTfM' R. - �* ' • 'fxie�esiutlon;to�managirrg;onsite�treatmenl�yatarripertormenoe thetmeiiee,any,septie�ys#em;:tllei :: ;' field'or ftkerbedw�nrkaietter`andllast�lar>igsr...Protacts sand�ftlters; nwur►dis ; liifgataorrsysteri+s;"- constiucFedfvretlairdsarranyreftiuent'dlspgsalldevice::Tnaatmierrt'dapacflie��upao�.2;00(1'GPD6.,: - a LOW SYSTEM MAINTENANCE FOR RELIABLE, SAFE AND AFFORDABLE OPERATION... The advanced design of Norweco pumping stations greatly reduces the amount of time required for installation and maintenance. Pumps and controls comply with the most stringent industry design standards, resulting in maximum energy efficiency, minimum service requirements and long life. All routine maintenance to the pumping station is performed from grade. Each pump can be removed by a single service technician without entering the basin. This feature eliminates the need for confined space entry equipment required by OSHA regulations. Each pumping station is protected by a heavy-duty access cover, available in either black or green. The cover is secured to the basin by a lockable, corrosion resistant compression clamp that prevents unauthorized entry. A safety/service guard is installed beneath the cover to prevent accidental entry into the basin and also functions as a self -draining service platform during routine maintenance. These features and benefits combine to make Norweco domestic wastewater pumping stations the most economical, reliable and convenient answer to any pumping application. �O© NORWALK WASMWATrR 4GVIPPAMNT COMPANY 220 REPUBLIC STREET NORWALK, OHIO, USA 44857-1196 TELEPHONE (419) 668-4471 FAX (419) 663-6440 www.norweco.com EQUIPMENT PACKAGE ARID COMPONENTS BACKED BY A COMPREHENSIVE LIMITED WARRANTY... Norweco pumping stations are designed, manufactured and tested to provide the most effective performance for domestic wastewater applications. All pumps are constructed to maximize the operational life of the system, including cast iron or stainless steel motor housings to dissipate heat and resist corrosion. Oil -filled motors insure continuous bearing lubrication, while thermal overload protection prevents damage from high temperatures. An automatic reset feature eliminates the need to manually reset the pump after an electrical overload condition. Every Norweco domestic wastewater pumping station is backed by a comprehensive one-year limited warranty. The limited warranty protects system owners from defects in material and workmanship under normal use and service for a period of one year from the date of purchase. The limited warranty provides secure, single -source protection to system owners and covers all components of the pumping station. Detailed warranty information is available from your authorized Norweco distributor or dealer. DISTRIBUTED LOCALLY BY: OMMII NORWECO, INC. ©m NCIIWALK WASTEYVATER EQUIPMENT COMPANY GENERAL SPECIFICATIONS The contractor shall furnish and install one complete duplex model domestic pumping station, including all applicable equipment, as described in the following specifications. The duplex pumping station shall collect wastewater or stormwater and transfer it to downstream processes or locations while providing reserve pumping capacity and extended pump life. The duplex pumping station shall be engineered to be readily serviceable from grade and shipped to the jobsite as a unitized, factory -built assembly to simplify installation. Principal items of equipment supplied shall include a duplex polyethylene pump basin, lockable access cover, compression clamp, safetylservice guard, inlet and outlet pipe sealing grommets, two (2) submersible centrifugal pumps, electro-mechanical float switches, waterproof junction box, electrical control center, prefabricated discharge piping assembly, ball check valves, pump disconnect fittings, throttling ®' valve, pump lifting cables and all other necessary internal piping and fittings. r1 OPERATING CONDITIONS The duplex model domestic pumping station shall be an integral part of the overall wastewater or stormwater treatment and disposal system. The pumping station shall accumulate and temporarily retain flow in the pump basin until sufficient volume is collected to actuate a submersible pump, as determined by the elevation of the float switches. Design of the pump basin shall allow the discharge piping to be installed at the standard elevation, orwhen required, below the frost line with added weep holes. The specific pump model furnished shall be selected to have sufficient delivery characteristics at the total dynamic head and solids handling capability required by the specific application. During operation, each submersible pump shall be capable of delivering gallons per minute (GPM) against a total dynamic head (TDH) of feet with a solids passage size of inches. Use of the duplex domestic pumping station, when installed by an authorized agent, shall be approved by the local governing regulatory agency. DUPLEX PUMP BASIN The pumping station shall be enclosed within a specifically designed and engineered basin to secure the pump, piping and internal electrical equipment. The basin shall be an integrally molded, heavy duty, one-piece unit, constructed of corrosion resistant, UV stabilized polyethylene for maximum strength and durability. The basin shall be designed and manufactured to be watertight at burial depths up to 12 feet. For discharge below the frost line, the pump basin shall be constructed with an alternate adjustable discharge location. A molded, one-piece, heavy duty, removable access cover with moisture drip lip shall secure the basin and internal components during normal operation. The cover shall be installed with the moisture drip lip 3" above finished grade and secured to the pump basin by a compression clamp with lock tab to prevent unauthorized access. The basin shall be equipped with a safety/service guard installed below the access cover to prevent accidental entry into the pump basin. The safety/service guard shall rest on the upper most internal rib of the pump basin and shall be securely connected to the basin by a stainless steel retainer cable to prevent loss or theft. Optional extension risers shall extend the access cover to grade for deeper installations. Optional ring sections, installed below the basin inlet, shall increase the liquid storage capacity of the pumping station for applications where additional capacity is required. The entire pump basin shall also be available in segmented sections for shipment via parcel delivery service. Field assembly of the individual sections shall allow use of the duplex pumping station in a variety of installations, including remote locations. Each joint within the segmented pump basin, extension risers or ring sections shall be sealed watertightwith a DUPLEX MODEL polyisoprene gasket and compression clamp secured with bolted lock tab. DOMESTIC PUMPING STATION DUPLEX ELECTRICAL CONTROLS The duplex electrical controls shall provide for automatic operation of the submersible pumps in proportion to the hydraulic flow. The controls shall alternate pump operation to assure equal wear and provide lag pump activation when flow conditions require. A rising liquid level within the basin shall cause the "on" float to initiate a lead pump cycle. Lowering of the liquid level by the lead pump shall cause the "off' float to end the pump cycle. Automatic pump alternation shall occur wit" each pump cycle. In the event of excessive incoming flow, a third float switch shall activate the lag pump to increase the pump station output. Afourth float switch shall activate a high water alarm if the liquid level rises to within 6" of the basin inlet invert. Control center options shall include a programmable timer for pump operation. The electrical control center shall be provided in a grounded NEMA 4 enclosure for mounting in the vicinity of the pumping station to allow ready access during service. The control center shall include a clearly labeled terminal strip with individual connections for all field wiring. All duplex electrical control centers shall be manufactured entirely from UL Listed or Recognized components. When the duplex pumping station is installed in conjunction with a Singulair Bio-Kinetic wastewater treatment system, pumping station electrical controls shall be combined with the aerator controls of the Singulair system. The use of Integrated System a,�.� QM.,. a.r.a.wo. Controls shall provide simplified and consolidated wiring of ELECTRICAL CONTROL CENTER all electrical controls into a single enclosure. DUPLEX SUBMERSIBLE PUMPS (Reference Data Chart Below) ❑ SUMP AND EFFLUENT PUMPS Two Norweco Model pumps wired for 115 volt, single phase, 60 cycle operation shall be installed in the duplex domestic pumping station. Each pump motor shall be horsepower, operating at RPM. All openings in the flow path of the submersible pumps shall be of sufficient size to permit the passage of a diameter sphere. The submersible pump motors shall contain moisture resistant windings and shall be securely mounted inside oil -filled, watertight housings for maximum pump life. Each pump shall be designed to be non -overloading throughout the entire pump curve. The stator housing casings and oil housing casings shall be of high grade cast iron or thermoplastic construction. The impellers shall be non -clog, recessed or enclosed type of cast iron, bronze or thermoplastic construction and all external fasteners shall be stainless steel. Each pump shall be provided with a rotating mechanical shaft seal, consisting of one stationary and one rotating ring held in contact by a spring. ❑ HIGH HEAD EFFLUENT PUMPS Two Norweco Model pumps wired for 115 volt, single phase, 60 cycle operation shall be installed in the duplex domestic pumping station. Each pump motor shall be horsepower, operating at RPM. All openings in the flow path of the submersible pumps shall be of sufficient size to permit the passage of a diameter sphere. Each pump cord shall be ten feet long and carry a SJOW designation, as recognized by UL and CSA for use in wastewater applications. The pump motors shall contain built-in overload and electrical surge protection with waterproof epoxy potted windings and shall be in compliance with IP58 (protected against dust and continuous submerging) of the IEC34 Standard. When operating between the rated horsepower and service factor horsepower, each motor speed shall be not less than the rated synchronous speed. The high head effluent pumps shall be capable of operating continuously in a total submerged condition at the rated load. Each motor assembly shall have corrosion resistant, stainless steel exterior construction. Q HIGH HEAD GRINDER PUMPS Two Norweco Model pumps wired for 230 volt, single phase, 60 cycle operation shall be installed in the duplex domestic pumping station. Each pump motor shall be horsepower, operating at RPM. The submersible grinder pumps shall be designed to reduce all materials found in normal domestic and light industrial sewage into a finely ground slurry. The submersible pump motors shall contain moisture resistant windings and shall be mounted in oil -filled, watertight housings. Each pump shall be designed to be non -overloading throughout the entire pump curve. The stator housing casings and oil housing casings shall be of high grade cast iron construction. Each pump impeller shall have recessed construction for increased bearing life. The grinder impellers and shredding rings of the pumps shall be constructed of hardened 440 stainless steel for maximum durability. Each grinder pump shall be provided with double tandem mechanical shaft seals in an oil -filled seal chamber for continuous lubrication. An optional seal leak probe shall detect water in each seal chamber and activate a seal failure indicator in the electrical control center. DATA CHART (Reference Individual Specifications) PUMP PUMP SOLIDS DISCHARGE MAXIMUM MAXIMUM TYPE MODEL VOLTAGE HP RPM PASSAGE SIZE DELIVERY TDH SIZE (NPT) (GPM) (FT) Sump and Effluent SC103 115 1/3 1550 3/4" 1 1/2" 66 32 Sump and Effluent SC104 115 4110 1600 3/4" 1 1/2" 80 32 High Head Effluent HB105 1i5 1/2 1 3450 1/16" 1 1/411 28 125 Sump and Effluent SC105 115 1/2 3450 3/4" 1 1/2" 57 80 High Head Grinder GB320 230 2 3450 Not Applicable 1 1/4" 40 105 DISCHARGE PIPING AND REMOTE REMOVAL SYSTEM The pump discharge piping shall be constructed of solvent welded schedule 80 PVC pipe and fittings. A ball check valve and a threaded disconnect fitting shall be provided downstream of each pump discharge. Downstream of the disconnect fittings, one schedule 80 PVC throttling valve shall be installed to throttle the pump discharge rate or isolate the downstream piping in the event either pump must be removed for service. The disconnect fittings and throttling valve shall be installed in the discharge line near the top of the pump basin for easy access and service, eliminating the need for entry into the wet well. An EPDM sealing grommet shall be utilized to seal the openings in the pump basin for both the discharge and inlet piping. EXTENSION RISERS AND RING SECTIONS For installations where the inlet invert of the pump basin is more than 34" below finished grade, optional extension risers shall be installed. When a riser is used, the internal safety/service guard shall be mounted in the uppermost rib of the riser, directly below the access cover. If additional basin capacity is required, ring sections shall be available for installation below the inlet invert. Risers and rings shall be available in 6" increments from 6" to 72" height. Extension risers and ring sections shall be constructed of corrosion resistant, UV stabilized polyethylene and shall be of the same design and structural characteristics as the pump basin. To form a watertight connection, all extension risers and ring sections shall be connected to the pump basin and sealed with a polyisoprene gasket and injection molded compression clamp secured with bolted lock tab. ONE YEAR LIMITED WARRANTY The manufacturer shall provide a limited warranty against defects in material and workmanship under normal use and service for a period of one year. The limited warranty shall cover all components of the pumping station purchased from the manufacturer, including pump basin, safety/service guard, access cover, compression clamp, optional extension risers, optional ring sections, submersible pumps and electrical controls. A detailed copy of the warranty shall be provided to the regulatory agency, contractor or customer as required. EQUIPMENT MANUFACTURER The equipment specified herein shall be the product of a manufacturer having a minimum of seven years experience in the construction of prefabricated wastewater treatment equipment and systems. Bids shall be prepared on the basis of the equipment and material specified herein for purposes of determining the low bid. This is not done, however, to eliminate other products of equal quality and efficiency. If equipment is to be substituted, approval of such substitution must be made prior to the execution of any order. It is assumed that substitution shall result in a reduction of cost to the contractor and that if accepted, these savings shall be passed along by a reduction in the base bid. DISTRIBUTED LOCALLY BY: q NORWALK WASTCWAL'Ol11PMPNT COMPANY 220 REPUBLIC STREET NORWALK, OHIO, USA 44857-1196 TELEPHONE (419) 668-4471 FAX (419) 663-6440 www.norweco.com Singulalr®, ModulairO, Travalalr°, Lift-RallO, Microsonle, NorwecoO, Bio-DynamicO, BloSanitizerO, Bio-Neutrallze&, Bio-Kinetic®, Bio-Static°, Bio-Gem®, Blue Crystal®, Crease Busterm and "BUSTER" logo° are registered trademarks of Norwalk Wastewater Equipment Company, Inc. CMM111 NORWECO, INC. Projeet: Ngy Short Plat Date: September 23, 2006 Client: Teng Ngy Prepared By: M. Olson CEI No.: 04-3200I Page 5.0 CONVEYANCE SYSTEM ANALYSIS and DESIGN Due to the size of the site and the limited flows from the site, the 100 year storm flow of 0.149 US was compared to a 12-iinch pipe at a slope of 0.5% for a worst case capacity analysis to simulate the proposed culvert at 105th Avenue SE. The 12-inch pipe has a capacity of 2.74 US which is much greater than the 100 year storm requirement. See attached hydraulic capacity calculation. 14201 NE 2001h Street, Suite 200 Phone: (425) 487-1732 Woodinville, WA 98072 (250) 250-7306 Email: cei@comerstone-engr.com (E�- NEa57rONE Fax: (4255) 487-1734 N G 1 Nt ER1N n, INC. Web: www.cornerstone-engr.com Open Channel Flow Calculator For Circular Pipes 14201 NE 200th St., #'W Woodinville, WA 98072 Project Name: wax _ Project No.: Description: Stormwater Conveyance Date: Ca{c. By: Pipe Diameter (D) = 12 in T Pipe Slope (S) _ 0.50 % Flow Depth (y) = 1.00 ft lF�i�in►Fate�t't?.1' _�¢�t��, e"����.;�74-��x;��F;}:.cfs,�:� Mannings Coeff. (n) = 0.012 D Theta Angle (0) = _ 6.28 rad 9 Y Wetted Area (A) = 0.79 ft2 Wet. Perimeter (P) = 3.14 ft Hydraulic Radius (R) = 0.25 ft Top Width (T) = 0.00 ft Flow Velocity = 3.48 fps Formulas: Theta Angle (0): if y _ r : 0 = 2Tr — 2a cos( y----r } r Ify<_r: B = 2acos( r^'Y) r Wetted Area (A): A = $ (B — sin O)d 2 Wetted Perimeter (P): P = 1 Od 2 Hydraulic Radius (R): R = A P Top Width (T): T = sin (%� where: r = Pipe Radius where: r = Pipe Radius Project: Ngy Short Plat Client: Teng Ngy CE] No.: 04-32001 Date: September 23, 2006 Prepared By: M. Olson Page 'tea 6.0 SPECIAL REPORTS and STUDIES No special reports or studies are required. 14201 NE 2001b Street, Suite 200 Phone: (425) 487-1732 Woodinville, WA 98072 (250) 250-7306 Email: cei@comerstone-engr.com (EO )r—ap� NEF:tsir �]NE Fax: (425)487-1734 N K[ R I N 13, 1 N C. Web: www.cornerstone-engr.com Project: Ngy Short Plat Client: Teng Ngy CEI No.: 04-32001 Date: September 23, 2006 Prepared By: M. Olson Page 7.0 OTHER PERMITS The permits required for this project consist of the following: Residential Building Permit Grading Permit Right of Way use Permit Utility permit Application to be prepared by the legal land owner for all permits listed above. 14201 NE 200`' Street, Suite 200 Phone: (425) 487-1732 Woodinville, WA 98072 (250) 250-7306 Email: cei@cornerstone-engr.com COr"�INr=FRs1r'ONE NEC R 1 N IN. I N C. Fax: (425)487-1734 vr (EO £ N O I Web: ww.cornerstone-engr.com Project: Ngy Short Plat Date: September 23, 2006 Client: Teng Ngy Prepared By: M. Olson CEI No.: 04-32001 Page 3$ 8.0 EROSION and SEDIMENT CONTROL ANALYSIS and DESIGN Clearing of the project site is limited to the area required to construct the proposed roadway improvements, conveyance system, and ESC facilities. Protection of downslpe areas will be provided by a combination of silt fencing and sedimentation facilities. Silt fencing will be provided for all downstream boundaries as necessary. All ESC elements are shown on the Temporary Erosion and Sediment Control (TESC) plan included in the plan set. Standard details and/or descriptions of the proposed BMP's have been included where necessary. 14201 NE 200i° Street, Suite 200 Phone: (425) 487-1732 Woodinville, WA 98072 (250) 250-7306 Email: cei cornerstone -en com Cfa�NEpt51-1rONE @ �' �f0 eNn1NECR1Nfl, INC. Fax: (425) 487-1734 Web: www.comerstone-engr.com BMP C103: High Visibility Plastic or Metal Fence Purpose Fencing is intended to: (1) restrict clearing 'to approved limits; (2) prevent disturbance of sensitive areas, their buffers, and other areas required to be left undisturbed; (3) limit construction traffic to designated construction entrances or roads; and, (4) protect areas where marking with survey tape may not provide adequate protection. Conditions of Use To establish clearing limits, plastic or metal fence may be used: • At the boundary of sensitive areas, their buffers, and other areas required to be left uncleared. • As necessary to control vehicle access to and on the site. Design and a High visibility plastic fence shall be composed of a high -density Installation polyethylene material and shall be at least four feet in height. Posts Specifications for the fencing shall be steel or wood and placed every 6 feet on center (maximum) or as needed to ensure rigidity. The fencing shall be fastened to the post every six, inches with a polyethylene tie. On long continuous lengths of fencing, a tension wire or rope shall be used as a top stringer to prevent sagging between posts. The fence color shall be high visibility orange. The fence tensile strength shall be 360 lbs./ft. using the ASTM D4595 testing method. o Metal fences shall be designed and installed according to the manufacturer's specifications. o Metal fences shall be at least 3 feet high and must be highly visible. o Fences shall not be wired or stapled to trees. Maintenance If the fence has been damaged or visibility reduced, it shall be Standards repaired or replaced immediately and visibility restored. 4-6 Volume It — Construction Stormweter Pollution Prevention August 2001 BMP C120: Temporary and Permanent Seeding Purpose Seeding is intended to reduce erosion by stabilizing exposed soils. A well -established vegetative cover is one of the most effective methods of reducing erosion. Conditions of Use Seeding may be used throughout the project on disturbed areas that have reached final grade or that will remain -unworked for more than 30 days. Channels that will be vegetated should be installed before major earthwork and hydroseeded with a Bonded Fiber Matrix. The vegetation should be well established (i.e., 75 percent cover) before water is allowed to flow in the ditch. With channels that will have high flows, erosion control blankets should be installed over the hydroseed. if vegetation cannot be established from seed before water is allowed in the ditch, sod should be installed in the bottom of the ditch over hydromulch and blankets. ° Retention/detention ponds should be seeded as required. • Mulch is required at all times because it protects seeds from heat, moisture loss, and transport due to runoff. • All disturbed areas shall be reviewed in late August to early September and all seeding should be completed by the end of September. Otherwise, vegetation will not establish itself enough to provide more than average protection. ° At final site stabilization, all disturbed areas not otherwise vegetated or stabilized shall be seeded and mulched. Final stabilization means the completion of all soil disturbing activities at the site and the establishment of a permanent vegetative cover, or equivalent permanent stabilization measures (such as pavement, riprap, gabions or geotextiles) which will prevent erosion. Design and Seeding should be done during those seasons most conducive to Installation growth and will vary with the climate conditions of the region. Specifications Local experience should be used to determine the appropriate seeding periods. ° The optimum seeding windows for western Washington are April 1 through June 30 and September 1 through October I . Seeding that occurs between July 1 and August 30 will require irrigation until 75 percent grass cover is established. Seeding that occurs between October 1 and March 30 will require a mulch or plastic cover until 75 percent grass cover is established. • To prevent seed from being washed away, confirm that all required surface water control measures have been installed. August 2001 Volume II -- Construction Stormwater Pollution Prevention 4-13 M e The seedbed should be firm and rough. All soil should be roughened no matter what the slope. If compaction is required for engineering purposes, slopes must be track walked before seeding. Backblading or smoothing of slopes greater than 4:1 is not allowed if they are to be seeded. Y New and more effective restoration -based landscape practices rely on deeper incorporation than that provided by a simple single -pass rototiiling treatment. Wherever practical the subgrade should be initially ripped to improve long-term permeability, infiltration, and water inflow qualities. At a minimum, permanent areas shall use soil amendments to achieve organic matter and permeability performance defined in engineered soil/landscape systems. For systems that are deeper than 8 inches the rototilling process should be done in multiple lifts, or the prepared soil system shall be prepared properly and then placed to achieve the specified depth. e Organic matter is the most appropriate form of "fertilizer" because it provides nutrients (including nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium) in the least water-soluble form. A natural system typically releases 2-10 percent of its nutrients annually. Chemical fertilizers have since been formulated to simulate what organic matter does naturally. In general, 104-6 N-P-K (nitrogen -phosphorus -potassium) fertilizer can be used at a rate of 40 pounds per acre. Slow -release fertilizers should always be used because they are more efficient and have fewer environmental impacts. it is recommended that areas being seeded for final landscaping conduct soil tests to determine the exact type and quantity of fertilizer needed. This will prevent the over -application of fertilizer. Fertilizer should not be added to the hydromulch machine and agitated more than 20 minutes before it is to be used. If agitated too much, the slow -release coating is destroyed. 0 There are numerous products available on the market that take the place of chemical fertilizers. These include several with seaweed extracts that are beneficial to soil microbes and organisms. If 100 percent cottonseed meal is used as the mulch in hydroseed, chemical fertilizer may not be necessary. Cottonseed meal is a good source of long-term, slow -release, available nitrogen. a Hydroseed applications shall include a minimum of I,500 pounds per acre of mulch with 3 percent tackifier. Mulch may be made up of 100 percent: cottonseed meal; fibers made of wood, recycled cellulose, hemp, and kenaf; compost; or blends of these. Tackifier shall be plant - based, such as guar or alpha plantago, or chemical -based such as polyacrylamide or polymers. Any mulch or tackifier product used shall be installed per manufacturer's instructions. Generally, mulches come in 40-50 pound bags. Seed and fertilizer are added at time of application. 4-14 Volume 11 - Construction Stormwater Pollution Prevention August 2001 I'm Mulch is always required for seeding. Mulch can be applied on top of the seed or simultaneously by hydroseeding. On steep slopes, Bonded Fiber Matrix (BFM) or Mechanically Bonded Fiber Matrix (MBFM) products should be used. BFMIMBFM products are applied at a minimum rate of 3,000 pounds per acre of mulch with approximately 10 percent tackifier. Application is made so that a minimum of 95 percent soil coverage is achieved. Numerous products are available commercially and should be installed per manufacturer's instructions. Most products require 24-36 hours to cure before a rainfall and cannot be installed on wet or saturated soils. Generally, these products come in 40-50 pound bags and include all necessary ingredients except for seed and fertilizer. BFMs and MBFMs have some advantages over blankets: • No surface preparation required; • Can be installed via helicopter in remote areas; On slopes steeper than 2.5:1, blanket installers may need to be roped and harnessed for safety; n They are at least $1,000 per acre cheaper installed. In most cases, the shear strength of blankets is not a factor when used on slopes, only when used in channels. BFMs and MBFMs are good alternatives to blankets in most situations where vegetation establishment is the goal. When installing seed via hydroseeding operations, only about 1/3 of the seed actually ends tip in contact with the soil surface. This reduces the ability to establish a good stand of grass quickly. One way to overcome this is to increase seed quantities by up to 50 percent. 0 Vegetation establishment can also be enhanced by dividing the hydromulch operation into two phases: 1. Phase l- Install all seed and fertilizer with 25-30 percent mulch and tackifier onto soil in the first lift; 2. Phase 2- Install the rest of the mulch and tackifier over the first lift. An alternative is to install the mulch, seed, fertilizer, and tackifier in one lift. Then, spread or blow straw over the top of the hydromulch at a rate of about 800-1000 pounds per acre. Hold straw in place with a standard tackifier. Both of these approaches will increase cost moderately but will greatly unprove and enhance vegetative establishment. The increased cost may be offset by the reduced need for: 1. Irrigation 2. Reapplication of mulch 3. Repair of failed slope surfaces August 2001 Volume /I — Construction Stormwater Pollution Prevention 4-15 This technique works with standard hydromulch (1,500 pounds per acre minimum) and BFM/MBFMs (3,000 pounds per acre minimum). i Areas to be permanently landscaped shall provide a healthy topsoil that reduces the need for fertilizers, improves overall topsoil quality, provides for better vegetal health and vitality, improves hydrologic characteristics, and reduces the need for irrigation. This can be accomplished in a number of ways: Recent research has shown that the best method to improve till soils is to amend these soils with compost. The optimum mixture is approximately two parts soil to one part compost. This equates to 4 inches of compost mixed to a depth of 12 inches in till soils. Increasing the concentration of compost beyond this level can have negative effects on vegetal health, while decreasing the concentrations can reduce the benefits of amended soils. Please note: The compost should meet specifications for Grade A quality compost in Ecology Publication 94-038. Other soils, such as gravel or cobble outwash soils, may require different approaches. Organics and fines easily migrate through the loose structure of these soils. Therefore, the importation of at least 6 inches of quality topsoil, underlain by some type of filter fabric to prevent the migration of fines, may be more appropriate for these soils. Areas that already have good topsoil, such as undisturbed areas, do not require soil amendments. Areas that will be seeded only and not landscaped may need compost or meal -based mulch included in the hydroseed in order to establish vegetation. Native topsoil should be re -installed on the disturbed soil surface before application. Seed that is installed as a temporary measure may be installed by hand if it will be covered by straw, mulch, or topsoil. Seed that is installed as a permanent measure may be installed by hand on small areas (usually less than L acre) that will be covered with mulch, topsoil, or erosion blankets. The seed mixes listed below include recommended mixes for both temporary and permanent seeding. These mixes, with the exception of the wetland mix, shall be applied at a rate of 120 pounds per acre. This rate can be reduced if soil amendments or slow - release fertilizers are used. Local suppliers or the local conservation district should be consulted for their recommendations because the appropriate mix depends on a variety of factors, including location, exposure, soil type, slope, and expected foot traffic. Alternative seed mixes approved by the local authority may be used. 4-16 Volume ll— Construction Stormwater Pollution Prevention August 2001 0 Table 4.1 represents the standard mix for those areas where just a temporary vegetative cover is required. Table 4.1 Temporary Erosion Control Sees! Mix % Weight % Purl % Germination Chewings or annual blue grass 40 •98 90 Festuca nibra var, cominutata or Poa anna Perennial rye - 50 98 90 Lolium erenne Redtop or colonial bentgrass 5 92 85 A rostis albs or A ostis tennis White dutch clover 5 98 90 Tri olium re ens Table 4.2 provides just one recommended possibility for landscaping seed. Table 4.2 Landsca In Seed Mix % Weight % Puri % Germination Perennial rye blend 70 98 90 Lolium erenne Chewings and red fescue blend 30 98 90 Festuca nibra var. commutate or Festuca nibra This turf seed mix in Table 4.3 is for dry situations where there is no need for much water. The advantage is that this mix requires very little maintenance: Table 4.3 Low-Growin Turf Seed Mix % Weight % Purl! % Germination Dwarf tali fescue (several varieties) 45 98 90 Festuca anindinacea var. Dwarf perennial rye (Barclay) 30 98 90 Lolium erenne var. barcla>> Red fescue 20 98 90 Festuca nibra Colonial bentWass 5 98 90 A rostis tenuis Table 4.4 presents a mix recommended for bioswales and other intermittently wet areas. Table 4.4 Bioswale Seed Mix* % Wei ht % Puri % Germination Tall or meadow fescue 75-80 98 90 Festuca arundinacea or Festuca elador Seaside/Creeping bentgrass 10-15 92 85 .9 rostis ahistris Redtop bentgrass 5-10 90 80 A rostis alba or A rostis &i antea * Modified Briargreen, Inc. Hrdroseeding Guide Wetlands Seed Aix August 2001 Volume 9 — Construction Stormwater Pollution Prevention 4-17 The seed mix shown in Table 4.5 is a recommended low -growing, relatively non-invasive seed mix appropriate for very wet areas that are not regulated wetlands. Other mixes may be appropriate, depending on the soil type and hydrology of the area. Recent research suggests that bentgrass (agrostis sp.) should be emphasized in wet -area seed mixes. Apply this mixture at a rate of 60 pounds per acre. Table 4.5 Wet Area Seed Mix* % Wei ht % Puri % Germination Tall or meadow fescue 60-70 98 90 Festuca antridinacea or Festuca elatior Seaside/Creeping bentgrass 10-15 98 85 Agrostis palustris Meadow foxtail 10-15 90 80 Ale ocurus pratensis Alsike clover 1-6 98 90 Tri olium h bridum Redtop bentgrass 1-6 92 85 A rostis alba "Modified Briargreen. Inc. Hydroseedirrg Gide Wetlands Seed Mix The meadow seed mix in Table 4.6 is recommended for areas that will be maintained infrequently or not at all and where colonization by native plants is desirable. Likely applications include rural road and utility right- of-way. Seeding should take place in September or very early October in order to obtain adequate establishment prior to the winter months. The appropriateness of clover in the mix may need to be considered, as this can be a fairly invasive species. if the soil is amended, the addition of clover may not be necessary. Table 4.6 Meadow Seed Mix % Weight % Purity % Germination Redtop or Oregon bentgrass 20 92 85 Agros& alba or A rostis ore onensis Red fescue 70 98 90 L Festrica rubra White dutch clover 10 98 90 Tri olium re ens Maintenance o Any seeded areas that fail to establish at least 80 percent cover (100 Standards percent cover for areas that receive sheet or concentrated flows) shall be reseeded. If reseeding is ineffective, an alternate method, such as sodding, mulching, or nets/blankets, shall be used. If winter weather prevents adequate grass growth, this time limit may be relaxed at the discretion of the local authority when sensitive areas would otherwise be protected. 4-18 Volume 11— Construction Stormwater Pollution Prevention August 2001 M • After adequate cover is achieved, any areas that experience erosion shall be reseeded and protected by mulch. If the erosion problem is drainage related, the problem shall be fixed and the eroded area reseeded and protected by mulch. • Seeded areas shall be supplied with adequate moisture, but not watered to the extent that it causes runoff. August 2001 Volume 11- Construction Stormwater Pollution Prevention 4-19 41 BMP C123: Plastic Covering Purpose Plastic covering provides immediate, short-term erosion protection to slopes and disturbed areas. Conditions of a Plastic covering may be used on disturbed areas that require cover Use measures for less than 30 days, except as stated below. • Plastic is particularly useful for protecting cut and fill slopes and stockpiles. Note: The relatively rapid breakdown of most polyethylene sheeting makes it unsuitable for long-term (greater than six months) applications. • Clear plastic sheeting can be used over newly -seeded areas to create a greenhouse effect and encourage grass growth if the hydroseed was installed too late in the season to establish 75 percent grass cover, or if the wet season started earlier than normal. Clear plastic should not be used for this purpose during the summer months because the resulting high temperatures can kill the grass. • Due to rapid runoff caused by plastic sheeting, this method shall not be used upslope of areas that might be adversely impacted by concentrated runoff. Such areas include steep and/or unstable slopes. • While plastic is inexpensive to purchase, the added cost of installation, maintenance, removal, and disposal make this an expensive material, up to $1.50-2.00 per square yard. a Whenever plastic is used to protect slopes, water collection measures must be installed at the base of the slope. These measures include plastic -covered berms, channels, and pipes used to covey clean rainwater away from bare soil and disturbed areas. At no time is clean runoff from a plastic covered slope to be mixed with dirty runoff from a project. O Other uses for plastic include: 1. Temporary ditch liner; 2. Pond liner in temporary sediment pond; 3. Liner for bermed temporary fuel storage area if plastic is not reactive to the type of fuel being stored; 4. Emergency slope protection during heavy rains; and, 5. Temporary drainpipe ("elephant trunk") used to direct water. 4-26 Volume II -- Construction Stormwater Pollution Prevention August 2001 Design and Plastic slope cover must be installed as follows: Installation 1. Run plastic up and down slope, not across slope; Specifications 2. Plastic may be installed perpendicular to a slope if the slope length is less than 10 feet; 3. Minimum of 8-inch overlap at seams; 4. On long or wide slopes, or slopes subject to wind, all seams should be taped; 5. Place plastic into a small (12-inch wide by 6-inch deep) slot trench at the top of the slope and backfill with soil to keep water from flowing underneath; 6. Place sand filled burlap or geotextile bags every 3 to 6 feet along seams and pound a wooden stake through each to hold them in place; 7. Inspect plastic for rips, tears, and open seams regularly and repair immediately. This prevents high velocity runoff from contacting bare soil which causes extreme erosion; 8. Sandbags may be lowered into place tied to ropes. However, all sandbags must be staked in place. Y Plastic sheeting shall have a minimum thickness of 0.06 millimeters. If erosion at the toe of a slope is likely, a gravel berm, riprap, or other suitable protection shall be installed at the toe of the slope in order to reduce the velocity of runoff. Maintenance o Torn sbeets must be replaced and open seams repaired. Standards If the plastic begins to deteriorate due to ultraviolet radiation, it must be completely removed and replaced. O When the plastic is no longer needed, it shall be completely removed. O Dispose of old tires appropriately. August 2001 Volume 11- Construction Stormwater Pollution Prevention 4-27 41 BMP C140: Dust Control Purpose Dust control prevents wind transport of dust from disturbed soil surfaces onto roadways, drainage ways, and surface waters. Conditions of Use In areas (including roadways) subject to surface and air movement of dust where on -site and off -site impacts to roadways, drainage ways, or surface waters are likely. Design and O Vegetate or mulch areas that will not receive vehicle traffic. In areas Installation where planting, mulching, or paving is impractical, apply gravel or Specifications landscaping rock. 0 Limit dust generation by clearing only those areas where immediate activity will take place, leaving the remaining area(s) in the original condition, if stable. Maintain the original ground cover as long as practical. o Construct natural or artificial windbreaks or windscreens. These may be designed as enclosures for small dust sources. 0 Sprinkle the site with water until surface is wet. Repeat as needed. To prevent carryout of mud onto street, refer to Stabilized Construction Entrance (BMP C 105). 0 Irrigation water can be used for dust control. Irrigation systems should be installed as a first step on sites where dust control is a concern. 4 Spray exposed soil areas with a dust palliative, following the manufacturer's instructions and cautions regarding handling and application. Used oil is prohibited from use as a dust suppressant. Local governments may approve other dust palliatives such as calcium chloride or PAM. PAM (BMP C 126) added to water at a rate of 0.5 lbs. per 1,000 gallons of water per acre and applied from a water truck is more effective than water alone. This is due to the increased infiltration of water into the soil and reduced evaporation. In addition, small soil particles are bonded together and are not as easily transported by wind. Adding PAM may actually reduce the quantity of water needed for dust control, especially in eastern Washington. Since the wholesale cost of PAM is about $ 4.00 per pound, this is an extremely cost- effective dust control method. Techniques that can be used for unpaved roads and lots include: G Lower speed limits. High vehicle speed increases the amount of dust stirred up from unpaved roads and lots. C Upgrade the road surface strength by improving particle size, shape, and mineral types that make up the surface and base materials. 4-40 Volume Il — Construction Stormwater Pollution Prevention August 2001 E • Add surface gravel to reduce the source of dust emission. Limit the amount of fine particles (those smaller than .075 mm) to 10 to 20 percent. • Use geotextile fabrics to increase the strength of new roads or roads undergoing reconstruction. • Encourage the use of alternate, paved routes, if available. • Restrict use by tracked vehicles and heavy trucks to prevent damage to road surface and base. • Apply chemical dust suppressants using the admix method, blending the product with the top few inches of surface material. Suppressants may also be applied as surface treatments. • Pave unpaved permanent roads and other trafficked areas. • Use vacuum street sweepers. • Remove mud and other dirt promptly so it does not dry and then turn into dust. • Limit dust -causing work on windy days. • Contact your local Air Pollution Control Authority for guidance and training on other dust control measures. Compliance with the local Air Pollution Control Authority constitutes compliance with this BMP. Maintenance Respray area as necessary to keep dust to a minimum. Standards August 2001 Volume H — Construction 5tormwater Pollution Prevention 4-41 Project: Ngy Short Plat Client: Teng Ngy CEI No.: 04-32001 Date: September 23, 2006 Prepared By: M. Olsgn pAQP 10.0 OPERATIONS and MAINTENANCE MANUAL Please see the attached Operations and Maintenance Manual in Appendix 90-A. 14201 NE 200`b Street, Suite 200 Phone: (425) 487-1732 Woodinville, WA 98072 (250) 250-7306 Email: cei cornerstone -en com ?RF!t Nr=FRS r0NE@ �• �� N £ E R ! N o, i N o. Fax: (425) 487-1734 Web: www.cornerstone-engr.com Site Improvement Bond Quantity Worksheet Web date: 11/21/2005 Q King County Department of Development & Environmental Services 900 Oakesdale Avenue Southwest Renton, Washington 98055-1219 For alternate formats, call 206-296-6600. 206-296-6600 TTY 206-296-7217 Project Name: Ngy Short Plat Date: 10/9/2006 Location: 17003 105th Avenue SE, Renton WA 98055 Project No.: L03SO031 Activity No.: Clearing greater than or equal to 5,000 board feet of timber? yes X no If yes, Forest Practice Permit Number: (RCW 76.091 Page 1 of 9 BOND.xIs Note: All prices include labor, equipment, materials, overhead and profit. Prices are from RS Means data adjusted for the Seattle area or from local sources if not included in the RS Means database. Unit prices updated: 02/12/02 Version: 04/22f02 Report Date: 10/9/2006 Site Improvement Bond Quantity Worksheet Web date: 11/21/2005 Ekeferencel Price Unk . Quan - i6 ions Coat ERO DIL�IENT N� L SIONISE CD TRH ' .' ' :..:.. N m r u b-e Backfill.& compaction -embankment ESCA $ 5.62 CY Check dams, 4" minus rock ESC-2 SWDM 5.4.6.3 $ 67.51 Each Crushed surfacing 1 1/4" minus ESC-3 WSDOT 9-03.9(3) $ 85.45 CY 5 1 427 Ditching___ESC-4 $ 8.08 CY 5 1 40 Excavation -bulk ESC-5 $ 1.50 CY Fence, silt ESC-6 SWDM 5.4.3.1 $ 1.38 LF 190 1 262 Fence, Temporary (NGPE) ESC-7 $ 1.38 LF Hydroseeding ESC-8 SWDM 5.4.2.4 $ 0.59 SY Jute Mesh ESC-9 SWDM 5.4.2.2 $ 1.45 SY Mulch, by hand, straw, 3" deep ESC-10 SWDM 5.4.2.1 $ 2.01 SY Mulch, by machine, straw, 2" deep ESC-11 SWDM 5.4.2.1 $ 0.53 SY Piping, temporary, CPP, 6" ESC-12 $ 10.70 LF Piping, temporary, CPP, 8" ESC-13 $ 16.10 LF Piping, temporary, CPP, 12" ESC-14 $ 20.70 LF Plastic covering, 6mm trick, sandbagged ESC-15 SWDM 5.4.2.3 $ 2.30 SY Rip Rap, machine placed; slopes ESC-16 WSDOT 9-13.1(2) $ 39.08 CY Rock Construction Entrance, 50'x15'x1' ESC-17 SWDM 5.4.4.1 $ 1,464.34 Each 1 1 1464 Rock Construction Entrance, 100'x15'x1' ESC-18 SWDM 5.4.4.1 $ 2,928.68 Each Sediment pond riser assembly ESC-19 SWDM 5.4.5.2 $ 1,949.38 Each Sediment trap, 5' high berm ESC-20 SWDM 5.4.5.1 $ 17.91 LF Sed. trap, 5' high, riprapped spillway berm section ESC-21 SWDM 5.4.5.1 $ 68.54 LF Seeding, by hand Sodding, 1" deep, level ground ESC-22 SWDM 5.4.2.4 $ 0.51 SY 1100 1 561 ESC-23 SWDM 5.4.2.5 $ 6.03 SY Sodding, 1" deep, sloped ground ESC-24 SWDM 5.4.2.5 $ 7.45 SY TESC Supervisor IESC-26 ESC-25 $ 74.75 HR 80 1 5980 Water truck, dust control SWDM 5.4.7 $ 97.75 HR 20 1 1955 WRITE -IN -ITEMS "** see e g Each ESC SUBTOTAL: $ 10,690.19 30% CONTINGENCY & MOBILIZATION: $ 3,207.06 ESC TOTAL: $ 13,897.25 COLUMN: A Page 2 of 9 Unit prices updated: 02/12/02 Version: 04/22/02 BOND.As Report Date: 10/9/2006 'J"N �It— Site Improvement Bond Quantity Worksheet Web date: 11/21/2005 r ' - . Right-iT UY Road Emproveim riti &°IDral Eadlidas - lenprarrements • '� r (Bond kWiscUon}" QuanL C ;'Cost : E1nit Price • � Unit a QiaariL Cast Quant Gast Quant Cost �, GENERAL #TEMS Backfill & Compaction- embankment GI - 1 $ 5.62 CY Backfill & Compaction, trench GI - 2 $ 8.53 CY 35 298.55 180 1,535.40 Clear/Remove Brush, b hand GI - 3 $ 0-36 SY Clearin /Grubbin !Tree Removal GI - 4 $ 8,876.16 Acre 0.25 2,219.04 Excavation - bulk GI - 5 $ 1.50 CY 450 675.00 Excavation - Trench GI - 6 $ 4.06 CY 35 142.10 180 730.80 Fencing, cedar, 6' hi h GI - 7 $ 18.55 LF Fencing, chain link, vi!y coated, 6' hi h GI - 8 $ 13.44 LF Fencing, chain link, ate, vinylcoated, 2 GI - 9 $ 1,271.81 Each Fencing, split rail, 3' hi h GI - 10 $ 12.12 LF Fill & compact - common barrow GI - 11 $ 22.57 CY Fill & compact - gravel base GI - 12 $ 25.48 CY 25 637.00 Fill R compact - screened topsoil Gl - 13 $ 37.85 CY 50 1,892,50 Gabion, 12" deep, stone filled mesh GI - 14 $ 54.31 SY Gabion, 18" deep, stone filled mesh GI - 15 $ 74.85 SY Gabion, 36" deep, stone filled mesh GI - 16 $ 132.48 SY Grading, fine, by hand GI - 17 $ 2.02 SY Grading. fine, with grader GI - 18 $ 0,95 SY Monuments, Y Ion GI - 19 $ 135.13 Each 4 540.52 Sensitive Areas Sin Gi - 20 $ 2.88 Each Sodding, 1"deep, slo round GI - 21 $ 7.46 SY Surve n , line 8 2tade GI - 22 $ 788.26 Da Surveying, lot location/lines GI - 23 $ 1,556.64 Acre 0.4 622.66 Traffic control crew 2 fla gers) GI - 24 $ 85.18 HR 20 1,703,60 Trail, 4" chied wood GI - 25 $ 7.59 SY Trail, 4" crushed cinder GI - 26 $ 8.33 SY Trail, 4�'top course GI - 2 $ 8.19 SY Wail, retaining, concrete GI - 28 $ 44.16 SF Wall, rockery GI - 29 $ 9.49 SF Page 3 of 9 SUBTOTAL 1,077.65 9,919.52 Unit prices updated: 02112J02 *KCC 27A authorizes only one bond reduction. Version: 4/22/02 BOND.)ds Report Date: 10/8/2006 Site Improvement Bond Quantity Worksheet Web date: 11/21/2005 ' ' R11ght-0f • ' lFiMiie P.ulilk Road,lmproyesnsnfs & DMIMW Eedill"M lmprorremeatts - Qaant. C am Cost_. UhgPrkel Unit Quant. -Cost Quint. Cost - sQuartt: `Cost= - �HAAD IMPROVEMENT � "IVO. r { s. :,. a v - _ �. _ wL ,� , � d. +•i. y �:. AC Grinding, 4' wide machine c 1000s RI - 1 $ 23.00 SY 60 1,380.00 AC Grinding, 4' wide machine 1000-200 RI-2 $ 5.75 SY AC Grinding, 4' wide machine > 2000s RI - 3 $ 1.38 SY AC RemovallDis osal/Re air RI - 4 $ 41.14 SY 60 2,466.40 Barricade, type I Rl - 5 $ 30.03 LF Barricade, type III f Permanent R1 - 6 $ 45.05 LF Curb & Gutter, rolled RI-7 $ 13.27 LF Curb & Gutter, vertical RI-8 $ 9.69 LF 140 1,356.60 Curb and Gutter, demolition and disposal RI - 9 $ 13.58 LF Curb, extruded asphalt RI - 10 $ 2.44 LF Curb, extruded concrete RI - 11 $ 2.56 LF Sawcut, asphalt, 3" depth RI - 12 $ 1.85 LF 300 555.00 Sawcut, concrete, per 1" depth RI - 13 $ 1.69 LF Sealant, asphalt RI -14 $ 0.99 LF 300 s 297.00 Shoulder, AC, ( see AC road unit price } RI - 15 $ - SY Shoulder, gravel, 4" thick RI -16 $ 7.53 SY Sidewalk, 4" thick RI - 17 $ 30.52 SY 80 2,441.60 Sidewalk, 4" thick, demolition and dis s Rf - 18 $ 27.73 SY Sidewalk, 5" thick Rl - 19 $ 34.94 SY Sidewalk, 5" thick, demolition and dispos RI - 20 $ 34.65 SY Sign, handicap RI - 21 $ 85.28 Each Striping, r stall RI - 22 $ 5.82 Each Striping, thermoplastic, for crossn2 LRL RI - 23 $ 2.38 SF Striping, 4" ref ectorized line RI - 24 $ 0.25 LF Page 4 of 9 SUBTOTAL 8,498.60 Unit prices updated: 02/12/02 "KCC 27A authorizes only one bond reduction. Version: 4/22102 BoND.xls Report Date: 10/9/2006 Site Improvement Bond Quantity Worksheet web date: 11/21/2005 zi= F.iAUii:Pu61k '' Road tmproysments &kDralrl8 Faciii#les Pftatb ttntsrowainerits -6on`d'Reduetion" Quanl Carts to : -Cost] E r =y " ` -` Uni#Pnce Unit` ' QS18nL Cast Quarts. • Cam# 'Quart t Cost RDAD SEJRFACENG (4" Rock = 25 base & 1 ter` tap course) ;Far'99 KCRS.(.6.5"• Rock= 5" beise`8.1:5" t •coSe For KCRS '93, (additional 2.5" base) add RS - 1 $ 3.60 SY C Overlay, 1.5" AC RS-2 $ 7.39 SY AC Overla , 2" AC RS-3 $ 8.75 SY AC Road, 2", 4" rock, First 2500 SY RS-4 $ 17.24 SY 300 5,172.00 80 1,379.20 AC Road, 2", 4" rock, . over 2500SY RS - 5 $ 13.36 SY AC Road, 3", 4" rock, First 2500 SY RS - 6 $ 19,69 SY AC Road, 3", 4" rock, - over 2500 SY RS - 7 $ 15.81 SY AC Road, 5", First 2500 SY . RS-8 $ 14.57 SY AC Road, 5", Qty. Over 2500 SY RS - 9 $ 13.94 SY AC Road, 6", First 2500 SY RS - 1 $ 16,76 SY AC Road, 6", (2ty, Over 2500 SY PRS - 1 $ 16.12 SY Asphalt Treated Base, 4" thick RS - 1 $ 9.21 SY Gravel Road, 4" rock, First 2500 SY RS - 1 A $ 11.41 SY Gravel Road, 4" rock, Qty. overd25WOOSYS-1 $ 7.53 SY PCC Road, 5", no base, over 25S-1 $ 21.51 SY PCC Road, 6", no base, over 2S - 1 $ 21.87 SY Thickened Edge S - 1 $ 6.89 LF Page 5 of 9 SUBTOTAL 5,172.00 1,379.20 Unit prices updated: 02/12/02 "KCC 27A authorizes only one bond reduction. Version: 4122/02 BOND.)ds Report Date: 10/9/2006 Site improvement Bond Quantity Worksheet Web date: 1112112005 s _ Eulating . Right-ofxrey, -� . :t Fup,re Puiitk , _ Road,imprrnre &.0rainalpFaclildbe - Privates ` lrrilir+o arrrsilt8 _Bond RNticilari` .y' I i]uant: Com ' Cw68t - Unrd Phoe Urdt 'Qtiard Cost ;Quart Cosk Quart. Cost r I]RAi�At`aE (CFF' = Comrgated Piastic'PipB; N12 Or i=gtdValeM) ' - e F Culvert priew, A of 4'-wverwas.easumed: ilas pertotated PVC is eariie ioe'as sotld pe `- �' 4 Access Road, R/D D - 1 1 $ 16.74 1 SY Bollards - fixed D - 2 $ 240.741 Each Bollards - removable D - 3 $ 452.341 Each " (CBs include frame and lid) CB T I D - 4 $ 1,257.64 Each CB Type IL D - 5 $ 1,433.59 Each 1 1,433.59 CB Type 11, 48" diameter D - 6 $ 2,033.57 Each 2 4,067.14 for additional depth over 4' D - 7 $ 436.52 FT CB Type 11, 54" diameter D - 8 $ 2,192.54 Each For additional depth over 4' D - 9 $ 486.63 FT CB Type 11, 60" diameter D - 10 $ 2,351.52 Each for additional depth over 4' D - 11 $ 536,54 FT CB Type 11, 72" diameter D - 12 $ 3,212.64 Each for additional depth over 4' D - 13 $ 692.21 FT Through -curb Inlet Framework (Add) D - 14 $ 366.09 Each 1 366.09 Cleanout, PVC, 4" D - 15 $ 130,55 Each Cleanout, PVC, 6" D - 16 $ 174.90 Each Cleanout, PVC, 8" D - 17 $ 224.19 Each Culvert, PVC, 4" D - 18 $ 8.64 LF 280 2,419.20 Culvert, PVC, 6" D - 19 $ 12,60 LF Culvert, PVC, 8" D - 20 $ 13.33 LF Culvert, PVC, 12" D - 21 $ 21,77 LF Culvert, CMP, 8" D - 22 $ 17.25 LF Culvert, CMP, 12" D - 23 $ 26.45 LF Cutvert, CMP, 15" D - 24 $ 32.73 LF Culvert, CMP, 18" D - 25 $ 37,74 LF Culvert, CMP, 24" D - 26 $ 53.33 LF Cutvert, CMP, 30" D - 27 $ 71.45 LF Cutvert, CMP, 36" D - 28 $ 112.11 LF Culvert, CMP, 48" D - 29 $ 140.831 LF Culvert, CMP, 60" D - 30 $ 235.45 1 LF Culvert, CMP, 72" D - 31 $ 302.58 1 LF Page 6 of 9 SUBTOTAL 366,09 7,919.93 Unit prices updated: 02/12/02 'KCC 27A authorizes only one bond reduction. Version: 4/22/02 ' BOND.)ds Report Date: 10/9/2006 Site Improvement Bond Quantity Worksheet Web date: 11/21/2005 �RAl1�AGE cohrr�� Eo _Fxlatlr!9' itighE�ofaaay' Roadlrripro ement9 a8`Dralnags Fetllltles ImprorertierNs'A $ ; A E 1' - Y 4]uarit Coat to s , ,., GOst y. No. iJnd Pri©e Urui QuaFrt ` "" COst Quanf ' b Cost ' t111arIL Cost" Culvert, Concrete, 8" D - 32 $ 21.02 LF Culvert, Concrete, 12" D - 33 $ 30.05 LF 40 1202 Culvert, Concrete, 15" D - 34 $ 37.34 LF Culvert, Concrete, 18" D - 35 $ 44.51 LF Culvert, Concrete, 24" D - 36 $ 61.07 LF Culvert, Concrete, 30" D - 37 $ 104.18 LF Culvert, Concrete, 36" D - 38 $ 137.63 LF Culvert, Concrete, 42" D - 39 $ 158.42 LF Culvert, Concrete, 48" D - 40 $ 175.94 LF Culvert, CPP, 6" D - 41 $ 10,70 LF Culvert, CPP, 8" D - 42 $ 16.10 LF Culvert, CPP, 12" D-43 $ 20.70 LF Culvert, CPP, 15" D - 44 $ 23-00 LF Culvert, CPP, 18" D - 45 $ 27.60 LF Culvert, CPP, 24" D - 46 $ 36.80 LF Culvert, CPP, 30" D - 47 $ 48.30 LF Culvert, CPP, 36" D - 48 $ 55.20 LF Ditching D - 49 $ 8.08 CY Flow Dispersal Trench 1,436 base+) D - 54 $ 25.99 LF French Drain 3' depth D - 51 $ 22.60 LF Geotextile, laid in trench, o ro ene D - 52 $ 2.40 SY Infiltration pond testing D - 53 $ 74.75 HR Mid -tank Access Riser, 48" dia, 6' dee D - 54 $ 1,605.40 Each Pond Overflow Spit" D - 55 $ 14.01 SY Restrictor/01 Separator, 12" D - 56 $ 1,045.19 Each Restrictor/Oil Separator, 15" D - 571 $ 1,095.66 Each Restrictor/Oil Separator, 18" D - 56 $ 1,146.16 Each Riprap, placed D - 59 $ 39.08 CY Tank End Reducer 36" diameter D - 60 $ 1,000.50 Each Trash Rack, 12" D - 61 $ 211.97 Each Trash Rack, 15" D - 62 $ 237.27 Each Trash Rack, 18" D - 63 $ 268.89 Each Trash Rack, 21" 1 D_- 64 $ 306.84 1 Each Page 7 of 9 SUBTOTAL 1202 Unit prices updated: 02/12/02 'KCC 27A authorizes only one bond reduction. Version: 4/22/02 BoND-xls Report Date: 10/9/2006 Site Improvement Bond Quantity Worksheet Web date: 1112i/2005 ? F �' #RlgM;= f-v-W �, �.. Fdtiire Publk w . cRoad ImpmenwMs . - IS,Diat Facilltles t?`r[daEa .: - Improve_meMs d, Boeirf liaduetlon* - - 1 Qttar�t. Corn Cdst " Uttd PrWe Unit :Quart:. i?rir�. Quart= Casty Qaard. cost- PAPJUNQ L9T.jLUFtFACj G z, . .. _ - .., .: No. 2" AC, 2" top course rock & 4" borrow PL - 1 $ 15.84 SY 2" AC, 1.5" top course & 2.5" base rour PL - 2 $ 17,24 SY 4" select borrow PL - 3 $ 4.55 SY 1.5" top course rock & 2.5" base course PL-4 $ 11.41 SY - r Such as detentiontwater ual' vaults. No - Detention Vault WI - 1 Each 1 20,000.00 WI-2 SY WI-3 CY WI-4 LF wl - 51 FT WI-6 WI-7 WI-8 WI-9 W-10 SUBTOTAL SUBTOTAL (SUM ALL PAGES): 16,316.34 30% CONTINGENCY & MOBILIZATION: 4,894.90 GRANDTOTAL: 21,211,24 COLUMN: B Page 8 of 9 C 20,000.00 39,218.65 11,765.59 50,984.24 D E Unit prices updated: 02/12/02 *KCC 27A authorizes only one bond reduction. Version: 4/22/02 BoND.As Report Date: 10/9/2006 Site Improvement Bond Quantity Worksheet Original bond computations prepared by: Name: Ngy Short Plat PE Registration Number: Firm Name: Cornerstone Engineering, inc. Address: 14201 NE 200th Street, Suite 200 Stabilization/Erosion Sediment Control (ESC) Existing Right -of -Way Improvements Future Public Road Improvements & Drainage Private Improvements Calculated Quantity Completed Total Right -of Way and/or Site Restoration Bond*/** (First $7,500 of bond* shall be cash.) Performance Bond* Amount (A+B+C+D) = TOTAL Reduced Performance Bond* Total *** Maintenance/Defect Bond* Total NAME OF PERSON PREPARING BOND* REDUCTION: (A) (B) Web date: 11 /21/2005 Date: 10/9/2006 Tel. #: 425-487-1732 Project No: L03SO031 ROAD IMPROVEMENTS & DRAINAGE FACILITIES FINANCIAL GUARANTEE REQUIREMENTS PERFORMANCE BOND* PUBLIC ROAD & DRAINAGE AMOUNT BOND* AMOUNT MAINTENANCE/DEFECT BOND* REQUIRED AT RECORDING OR $ 13,897.2 TEMPORARY OCCUPANCY'** $ 21,211.2 (C) $ (D) $ 50,984.2 (A+B) $ 35,108.5 (T) $ 86,092.7 Minimum on amount is $1000. (E) $ x 0.30 $ 25,827.8 OR (T-E) $ 86,092.7 Use larger o 0 or Date: (B+C) x 0.25 = $ 5,302.8 * NOTE: The word "bond" as used in this document means any financial guarantee acceptable to King County. ** NOTE: KCC 27A authorizes right of way and site restoration bonds to be combined when both are required. The restoration requirement shall include the total cost for all TESC as a minimum, not a maximum. In addition, corrective work, both on- and off -site needs to be included. Quantities shall reflect worse case scenarios not just minimum requirements. For example, if a salmonid stream may be damaged, some estimated costs for restoration needs to be reflected in this amount. The 30% contingency and mobilization costs are computed in this quantity. `** NOTE: Per KCC 27A, total bond amounts remaining after reduction shall not be less than 30% of the original amount (T) or as revised by major design changes_ SURETY BOND RIDER NOTE: If a bond rider is used, minimum additional performance bond shall be $ 50,984.2 (C+D)-E REQUIRED BOND* AMOUNTS ARE SUBJECT TO REVIEW AND MODIFICATION BY DOES Page 9 of 9 Unit prices updated: 02/12/02 Check out the DDES Web site at.www.metrokc.-ao Version: 4/22/02 BoND.XIs Report Date: 10/9/2006 Project: Ngy Short Plat Date: September 23, 2006 Client: Teng Ngy Prepared By: M. Olson CEI No.: 04-32001 Page worp OOP'' , 1 1 :��• �MIX1��[M!1111N� 14201 NE 200i° Street, Suite 200 Phone: (425) 487-1732 Woodinville, WA 98072 (250) 250-7306 Email: cei cornerstone -en com NEFISVONE @ �' �' O�Fa� N E E F I N a, � N 6. Fax: (425) 487- 3 734 Web: www.comerstone-engr.com 0- APPENDIX A MAINTENANCE STANDARDS FOR PRIVATELY MAWTAINED DRAINAGE FACILMES NO.3 - CLOSED DETENTION SYSTEMS (PIPESNANKS) Maintenance Defect Conditions When Maintenance Is Noodod Rosults Expectad Whon Component Maintenance is Performed Storage Area Plugged Air Vents One-half of the cross section of a vent Is blocked at Vents free of debris and any point with debris and sediment sediment Debris and Accumulated sediment depth exceeds 10% of the All sediment and debris Sediment diameter of the storage area for % length of storage removed from storage area. vault or any point depth exceeds 159E of diameter. Example: 72-Inch storage tank would require cleaning when sediment reaches depth of 7 Inches for more than % length of tank. Joints Between Any crack allowing material to be transported Into All joint between tank /pipe Tanklfte Section facility sections are sealed Tank Pipe Bent Any part of tank/pips is bent out of shape more than Tank/ pipe repaired or replaced Out of Shape 10% of it's design shape to design. Manhole Cover Not In Place Cover is missing or only partially in place. Any open Manhole Is dosed. manhole requires maintenance. Locking Mechanism cannot be opened by one maintenance Mechanism opens with proper Mechanism Not person with proper tools. Botts into frame have lose toots. Working than 16 Inch of thread (may not apply to self-locking lids.) Cover Difficult to one maintenance person cannot remove lid after Cover can be removed and Remove applying 801bs of lift. intent Is to keep cover from reinstalled by one maintenance sealing off access to maintenance. person. Ladder Rungs King County Safety Office and/or maintenance person Ladder meets design standards Unsafe judges that ladder Is unsafe due to missing rungs, allows maintenance person safe misalignment, rust, or cracks. atxess. Catch Basins See "Catch Basins" Standards No. 5 See "Catch Basins" Standards No. 5 1998 Surface Water Design Manual A-3 9/l/98 APPENDIX A MAINTENANCE STANDARDS FOR PRNATELY MAINTAINED DRAINAGE FACUITIES NO.4 - CONTROL STRUC71JRE19FLOW RESTRICTOR Maintenance Defect Condition When Maintenance Is Needed Hosults Expected Whon Component Maintenance Is Performed General Trash and Debris Distance between debris build-up and bottom of AN trash and debris removed. (Includes Sediment) orifice plate is teas than 1-112 feet. Structural Damage Structure is not securely attached to manhole well Structure securely attached to and outlet pipe structure should support at least wall and outlet pipe. 1,000 ibs of up or down pressure. Structure Is not In upright position (allow up to Structure In correct position. 10% from plumb). Connections to outlet pipe are not watertight and Connections to outlet pipe are show signs of rust. water tight; structure repaired or replaced and works as designed. Any holes —other than designed holes —in the Structure has no hates other structure, than designed holes. Cleanout Gate Damaged or Missing Cleanout gate is not watertight or Is missing. Gate is watertight and works as designed. Gate cannot be moved up and down by one Gate moves up and down easily maintenance person, and is watertight. Chain leading to gate Is missing or damaged. Chain is In place and works as designed. Gate is rusted over 50% of its surface area. Gate is repaired or replaced to meet design standards.. Orifice Plate Damaged or Missing Control device is not working property due to Plate Is in place and works as missing, out of place, or bent orifice plate. designed. Obstructions Any trash, debris, sediment, or vegetation Plate is free of all obstructions blocking the plate. and works as designed. Overflow Pipe Obstructions Any trash or debris blocking (or having the Pipe Is tree of all obstructions potential of blocking) the overflow pipe. and works as designed. Manhole See "Closed Detention Systems' Standards No. 3 See "Closed Detention Systems' Standards No. 3 Catch Basin See "Catch Basins" Standards No. 5 See 'Catch Basins" Standards No, 5 911198 1998 Surface Water Design Manual A-4 APPENDIX A MAINTENANCE STANDARDS FOR PRIVATELY MAINTAINED DRAINAGE FACiL. MS l01� NO. 5 - CATCH BASINS Maintenance Defect Conditions Whon Maintenance Is Needed Results Expoctod Whon Component Maintenanco is performed General Trash & Debris Trash or debris of more than 1/2 cubic foot which is No Trash or debris located (Includes Sediment) located immediately in front of the catch basin immediately In front of catch opening or Is blocking capacity of the basin by basin opening. more than 10% Trash or debris (in the basin) that exceeds 1/3 the No trash or debris In the catch depth from the bottom of basin to invert the lowest basin. pipe into or out of the basin, Trash or debris in any inlet or outlet pipe blocking Inlet and outlet pipes free of more than 1/3 of its height trash or debris. Dead animals or vegetation that could generate No dead animals or vegetation odors that could cause complaints or dangerous present withtn the catch basin. gases (e.g., methane). Deposits of garbage exceeding 1 cubic foot In No condition present which volume would attract or support the breeding of Insects or rodents. Structure Damage to Comer of frame extends more than 3/4 Inch past Frame'ls even with curb. Frame and/or Top Slab curb face into the street (If applicable). Top slab has holes larger than 2 square inches or Top slab Is free of holes and cracks wider than 1/4 Inch (intent is to make sure cracks, all material Is running Into basin). Frame not sitting flush on top stab. i.e., separation Frame is sitting flush on top of more than 3/4 Inch of the frame from the top slab. slab. Cracks In Basin Walls/ Cracks wider than 1/2 inch and longer than 3 feet, Basin replaced or repaired to Bottom any evidence of soil particles entering catch basin design standards. through cracks, or maintenance person judges that structure is unsound. Cracks wider than 112 inch and longer than 1 foot No cracks more than 114 Inch at the joint of any inlet/ outlet pipe or any evidence wide at the Joint of inletloutlet of soil particles entering catch basin through pipe. cracks. Sediment/ Basin has settled more than 1 inch or has rotated Basin replaced or repaired to Misalignment more than 2 inches out of alignment. design standards. 1998 Surface WaterlDesign Manual 9/1/98 A-5 APP MD( A MAINTENANCE STANDARDS FDR PRIVATELY MAiNTAW® DRAINAGE FACMr [ES 440 NO.5 - CATCH BASINS (COflMNUED) Maintenanco Defect Conditions When Maintenance Is Noodod Rosutta Expected When Componont Maintonanco In porformod Fire Hazard Presence of chandcals such as natural gas, oil and No flammable chemicals gasoline, present. Vegetation Vegetation growing across and blocking more than 10% of the basin opening. Vegetation growing in InleUoudet pipe joints that Is more than six inches tali and lase than six Inches apart. Polkutlon Nonflammable chemicals of more than V2 cubic toot per three feet of basin length. Catch Basin Cover Cover Not In Place' Cover is missing or only partially In place. Any open catch basin requires maintenance. Locking Mechanism Mechanism cannot be opened by on maintenance Not Working person with proper tools. Bolts Into frame have two then 1/2 inch of thread. Cover Difficult to One maintenance person cannot remove Rd after Remove applying 80 be. of W, intent is keep cover from sealing off access to maintenance. Ladder Ladder Rungs ladder Is unsafe due to missing rungs, misalignmen% Unsafe rust cracks, or sharp edges. Metal Grates Grate with opening wider than 7/8 Inch. (If Applicable) Trash and Debris Trash and debris that Is blocking more than 20% of grate surface. Damaged or Grate missing or broken members) of the grate. Missing. No vegetation blocking opening to basin. No vegetation or root growth present No pollution present other than surface film. Catch basin cover Is closed Mechanism opens with proper tools. Cover can be removed by one maintenance person. Ladder meets design standards and allows maintenance person safe access. Grate opening meats design standards. Grate free of trash and dettds. Grate Is In place and meets design standards. 9/1/98 1998 Surface Water Design Manual A-6 t47 APPENDIX A MA1NTPNANCE STANDARDS FOR PRIVATELY MAINTAINED DRAINAGE FACUTIES NO.10 - CONVEYANCE SYSTEMS (PIPES & DITCHES) Maintenance Detect Conditions When Maintenance M Noeded Results Expoctod When Component Maintenance is Performed Pipes Sediment & Debris Accumulated sediment that exceeds 20% of the Pipe cleaned of all sediment diameter of the pipe. and debris. Vegetation Damaged Open Ditches Trash & Debris Sediment Vegetation Erosion Damage to Slopes Rock lining Out of Place or Missing (If Applicable). Catch Basins Debris Barriers (e.g., Trash Rack) Vegetation that reduces free movement of water AN vegetation removed so water through pipes, flows freely through pipes. Protective coating is damaged; rust is causing Pipe repaired or replaced. more than 50% deterioration to any part of pipe. Any dent that decreases the cross section area of Pipe repaired or replaced. pipe by more than 20%. Trash and debris exceeds 1 cubic foot per 1,000 square feet of ditch and slopes. Accumulated sediment that exceeds 20 % of the design depth. Vegetation that reduces free movement of water through ditches. See 'Ponds" Standard No. 1 Trash and debris cleared from ditches. Ditch cleaned/ flushed of all sediment and debris so that it matches design. Water flows freely through ditches. See "Ponds* Standard No. f Maintenance person can see native soil beneath Replace rocks to design the rock lining. standards. Sea "Catch Basins; Standard No. 5 See "Debris Barriers" Standard No.6 See 'Catch Basins" Standard No. 5 See 'Debris Barters" Standard No. 6 NO. 11- GROUNDS (LANDSCAPING) Maintenance Defect Conditions When Maintenance is Needed Results Expected When Component Maintenance is Performed General Weeds Weeds growing In more than 20% of the landscaped Weeds present In less than 5% (Nonpoisonous) area (trees and shrubs only). of the landscaped area. Safety Hazard Trash or Litter Trees and Shrubs Damaged Any presence of poison ivy or other poisonous No poisonous vegetation vegetation. present in landscaped area. Paper, cans, bottles, totaling more than f cubic foot Area clear of titter. within a landscaped area (trees and shrubs only) of 1,000 square feet. Limbs or parts of trees or shrubs that are split or broken which affect more than 25% of the total foliage of the tree or shrub. Trees or shrubs that have been blown down or knocked over. Trees or shrubs which are not adequately supported or are leaning over, causing exposure of the roots. Trees and shrubs with less than 50/16 of total foliage with split or broken limbs. Tree or shrub in place free of Injury. Tree or shrub in place and adequately supported; remove any dead or diseased trees. 1998 Surface Water Design Manual 911199 A-9 APPENDIX A MAINTENANCE STANDARDS FOR PIUVATELY MAINi'AKM DRAINAGE FACI]LIT MS r+ NO. 12 - ACCESS ROADS/ EMEME M Maintenance Defeat Condition When AMaintononco Is Hoodod Results F.xpoctod Whom Component Maintenance Is Performed General Trash and Debris Trash and debris exceeds 1 cubic toot per 1,000 Roadway tree of debris which square feet I.e., trash and debris would fill up could damage Brea. one standards size garbage can. Blocked Roadway Debris which could damage vehicle time (glass Roadway free of debris which or metal). could damage tires. Any obstruction which reduces clearance above Roadway overhead dear to 14 feet road surface to less than 14 feet. high. Any obstruction restricting the access to a 10 to Obstruction removed to allow at 12 foot width for a distance of more than 12 feat least a 12 foot access. or any point restricting access to less than a 10 foot width. Road Surface Settlement, Potholes, When any surface defect exceeds 6 inches In Road surface uniformly smooth Mush Spots, Ruts depth and 6 square feet in area. In general, any with no evidence of settlement, surface defect which hinders or prevents potholes, mush spots, or ruts. maintenance access. Vegetation in Road Weeds growing in the road surface that are Road surface tree of woods taller Surface more than 6 Inches tall and less than 6 inches than 2 Inches. tali and less than 6 Inches apart within a 400- square foot area. Modular [arid Build-up of sediment mildly contaminated with Removal of sediment and disposal Pavement petroleum hydrocarbons, in keeping with Health Department recommendations for mildly contaminated soils or catch basin sediments. Shoulders and Erosion Damage Erosion within 1 foot of the roadway more than a Shoulder free of erosion and Ditches Inches wide and 6 inches deep.: matching the surrounding road. Woods and Brush Weeds and brush exceed is Inches in height or Weeds and brush out to 2 Inches hinder maintenance access. in height or cleared In such a way as to allow maintenance access. 911198 1999 Surface Water Design Manual A-lti r APPENDIX A MAINTENANCE STANDARDS FOR PRIVATELY MAINTAINED DRAINAGE FACf7.TM y LLWOU NO.13 - WATER QUALITY FACILITIES (CONTINUED) F.) Leaf Compost Filters Maintonenco Defect - Conditions When Maintenance Is Needed Results Expected When Component Maintenance is Performed Above (around Sediment Sediment depth exceeds 0.25-inches. No sediment deposits on fabric Open Swale accumulation on Goo- layer which would Impede Textile/ media permeability of the fabric. Trash and debris Trash and debris accumulated on compost filter Trash and debris removed from accumulations bad, compost filter bed. Sediment/ debris In When the yard drain CB's and dean -outs become Remove the accumulated draw yard drains/ full of sediment and/ or debris. material from the facility. clean -outs. Vegetation Vegetation Impending flow through section, or Vegetation is mowed or encroaching into compost media. eradicated such that flow is no longer impeded. Leaf Compost Media Drawdown of water through the feat compost, Replace media with new to takes longer than 12-hours, and/ or flow through design specifications, in addition the overflow pipes occurs frequently. to replacing fabric. Short -Circuiting When Channeled flow occurs over the leaf media; Flow is uniform over the entire and where flow perks through the media at the width of the media section, and baffles. concentrated percolation does not occur at the battle walls. Media needs to be graded and re -set at the baffles to form a seal. Weir plate may need to be adjusted in addition, Erosion Damage to Eroded damage over 2-Inches deep where cause Slopes should be stabilized by Slopes of damage is prevalent or potential for continued using proper erosion control erosion Is prevalent. measures. Damaged Goo -Textile When fabric is torn, deteriorated, reveled, ate. Fabric replaced as necessary. Fabric. Rock Pad Missing or Soil beneath the pad Is visible. Replace or rebuild the rock pad out of place to design standards. Damaged Pipes Any part of the pipe system that Is crushed, Pipe repaired or replaced. damage due to corrosion, and/ or settlement. V-Notch Weir Flow is not being uniformly spread over filter Clean, repair or replace the weir Assemblies media. systems. Below Ground Sediment Sediment depth exceeds 0.25-inches. No sediment deposits on fabric Vault Accumulation on Goo- layer which would Impede Textile/ Media. permeability of the fabric and compost media. Sediment Sediment depth exceeds 64nches in first chamber. No sediment deposits in vault Accumulation in Vault bottom of first chamber. Trash/ Debris Trash and debris accumulated on compost filter Trash and debris removed from Accumulation bed. the compost filter bed. Sediment in Drain When drain pipes, clean -outs, yard drains become Remove the accumulated Pipes/ Yard Drains/ full with sediment and/ or debris. material from the facilities. Clean -Outs 9/1198 1998 Surface Water Design Manual A-16 -7A APPENDIX A MAINTENANCE STANDARDS FOR PRIVATELY MAINTAINED DRAINAGE FACII.ITIFS NO.13 - WATER QUALITY FACILMES (CONTINUED) F. Leaf Compost Filter Continued Maintenance Defeat Condition When Maintenance Is Needed Results Expected When Component Maintenance Is Performed Below Ground Leaf Compost Media Drawdown of water through Me leaf compost, takes Replace media with new longer than 12-hours, and/ or overflow occurs compost to specifications, in frequently. addition to replacing fabric. Short Circulting When seepage occurs along the vault wall and Percolation of water occurs comers occur. along the walls and comers and not through the media section. Media needs to be reset along the vault well and comers to form a semi -seal. Plugged/ Damaged Flow tends to backup unusually high in the first Clean out the elbow fittings and/ Elbows chamber of the vault. or replace It damaged. Damaged Goo -Textile Fabric is tom, deteriorated, raveled, etc. Fabrfc replaced as necessary. Fabric Rock Pad Missing or Soil beneath the pad is visible. Replace or rebuild the rock pad Out of Place to design standards. Damaged Pipes Any part of the pipes that are crushed, damaged Pipe repaired and/ or replaced. due to corrosion and/ or settlement. Access Cover Cover cannot be opened, one person cannot open Cover repaired to proper Damaged/Prot the cover, corrosion/ deformation of cover. working specifications or Working replaced. V-Notch Weir Flow does not spread uniformly over filter media by Clean, repair and/ or replace the Assemblies weir section. weir plate section, or adjust height. Vault Structure Cracks wider than 1/2-inch and any evidence of soil Vault replaced or repaired to Includes Cracks in particles entering the sVucture through the cracks, design specifications. Wall, Bottom, or maintenancei inspection personnel determines Damage to Frame that the vault is not structurally sound. and/ or Top Slab Baffles Baffles corroding, cracking warping, and/ or showing Repair or replace baffles to signs of failure as determined by maintenanosJ specification. inspection person. Access Ladder Ladder is corroded or deteriorated, not functioning Ladder replaced or repaired and Damaged properly, missing rungs, cracks, and misaligned. meets specifications, and Is safe to use as determined by inspection personnel. Cracks wider than 1/24nrh at the joint of any No cracks more than 1/4-inch inlet/outlet pipe or any evidence of soil particles wide at the joint of the inletl entering the vault through the walls. outlet pipe. 1998 Surface Water Design Manual 9/1/98 A-17 1\1 �j 33 0r "te: 77 ............ 4 �d J 06SR054 Routed to Pete Dye, PM Joi Fee Est. Deposit is okay. Ce;t Df Applicant .j'!C --'L L"-'L-"'L L'�� . ................ ..... .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. ........ 06S Comment Routed to Pete Dye, 10 copies of sewer main extension for Ng, short L065RO54 Comment Routed to Pete Dye, letter from Tong Ngy, regarding Fee Est letter. J`l� MM C result of a claim filed under the Tiger Mtn L A. a ie!u ...... IZINJ 7, lr," !W"'N' W4 Pn Comment 7jr. ikdd 6644611piwellfa'dCp i-, ,`,Type expf 0f yp, SAN DE RSJ changed status to CAKE LE D on 05/06/2008 (added by script) M old than 1 -1 l2 years LJ14"I 'd have past Since the fee est. Wier was sent. Neither the consultaN or appicant;esponded to the requirements to acknowledged or pay the fee. Pursuant to our practices and financial policies (estimates,,"j,o d. "'Y Y, are good for 180 days), the applicant wwit!�e required to re -submit for a re -estimate i 77 -A� 12/31/21311 5/6/2008 0 fir E W '�r'q`. '40T BI IaNEl E;6 0, .' M CD ru.On,*tid�d v,..4.7,77f k 121 'e'2;;36'PM'] Thursday, Jan 22, 2009 02:36 PM User: carlsonj Computer: DE242927 Os: Windows NT Version: 5.1 -07da 'p W-ROM A Lo ry SW 114'23 TOWNSHIP 23RANGE "5EAST Y..M.. . ......... DW:PFJ-7-412D03 •'Annex�d to [hp CWfEfntonel4-ctiveMach I2Q j aack§�Op l jq, Ilk: 'dq; I Iq "P 1q, v J;lBi rg, Nam;,]NGY SHORT PLAT Otcr. 21OT5S Applied-M102003 I ..... ..... � alce 'Wic 12/11 vi I —SW 114 29 TOWNSHIP 23 RANGE 5 EAST WM. .11 14/2003:,Ij;3 41S A 'A' f' f /A SIE q0 PA �PO V 09/1 )2004 tf),.r)ViA�plicaN:jNYq, Y1j, i j'j, U 1j '4• a=cld: 1�� TI I — C 00 Aibutit PAid- $6gEj 50, 6 50 1 Y� "y" Er�e* by; 'J>'gb'&6'Eh'te';& 11 14)2, 'J' �jq'q t1' Ilk '�L I Sprial Niinbqr: 6138`i Uietv 150elsv.43.77 s PFject ... M: Wc 1 2:21 PM, Thursday, Jan 22, 2009 02:21 PM User: carisonj Computer: DE242927 Os: Windows NT Version: 5,1 Web date: 09/0912005 9 CER q]F ►TI,O,N'&:°T°; „`NS:F,ER; ,Rs� .'hrdt; a;::` ,4F;AP�P< I;CANT ShATUS;�� King Countyl Department of Development and Environmental Services 900 Oakesdale Avenue Southwest Renton, Washington 98055-1219 For alternate formats, call 206-296-6600. 206-296-6600 TTY 206-296-7217 Permit Number: FOR CURRENT OWNER: 1, (print name) hereby certify that I am an/the owner of the property which is the subject of this application for permit or approval. If I am not the sole owner of the property, I certify that I am authorized by any and all other owners of the property to make this certification and transfer any an all rights I/we have to apply for this permit or approval to the person listed below. 1, therefore certify that (print name) is the "applicant" for this permit or approval and shall remain the "applicant" for the duration of this permit or approval unless "applicant" status is transferred in writing on a form provided by this department. By being the "applicant," that individual assumes financial responsibility for all fees and will receive any refunds paid. I certify under penalty of perjury under the laws of the State of Washington that the foregoing is true and correct Signature of Owner Date Signed FOR INDIVIDUALS: I, (print name) hereby certify that 1 am the "applicant" for this permit or approval. I shall remain the "applicant" for the duration of this permit or approval unless "applicant" status is transferred in writing on a form provided by this department. I accept financial responsibility for all fees associated with this permit or approval and will receive any refunds. My mailing address is: I certify under penalty of perjury under the laws of the State of Washington that the foregoing is true and correct. Signature of Applicant Date Signed OR FOR CORPORATIONS/BUSINESS ASSOCIATIONS: 17, z 1A q n—EnR , (print name) hereby certify that I am an authorized ages# of �— , a corporation or other business association aut orized in the fate of Washington and th t this business association is the "applicant" for this permit or approval and is financially responsible for all fees and will receive any refunds paid. This association shall remain the "applicant" for the duration of this permit or approval unless "applicant" status is transferred in writing on a form provided by this department. The mailing address of this business association is: E 4 2 f7 i Ku:-- -21-Y1-M c,-T . C► t t -n-- ?can I c nder natty of erjury under the of the State of Washington that the foregoing is true and correct. 1 Signature of Appli XVDDate Signed CeM91iTr sf A p a�as g c4apstat.pdf 0&! 41i008 9 2-3D6 Page 1 of 2 K.C. D.D.E.S. NOTICE TO APPLICANTS: By law, this department returns alf engineering and other plans to the applicant. If, however, you wish to authorize the department to return engineering and other plans directly to the engineer, architect, or other consultant for the limited purpose of making corrections, please designate below: ❑ 1 authorize this department to return plans directly to my consultant(s) for the limited purpose of making corrections, as designated on this form. CONSULTANTS: Check out the DDES Web site at www.metrokc.gov/ddes CertAndTransferApplicanlStatusFQRtvI doc tc-car-trapstat.pdf 0910912005 Page 2 of 2 NO King County vncN.lnL—iv i Department of Development and Environmental Services 1998 Surface Water Design Manual Land Use Services Division 1993 King County Road Standards 900 Oakesdale Avenue Southwest Renton, WA 98055-1219 206-296-6600 TTY 206-296-7217 For alternate formats, call 206-296-6600. PROJECT INFORMATION Project Name Activity Number Project Number Development Number DDES Review Engineer Notes M ❑ Hearing Examiner's Report ........ Date Revised Report ... ❑ Plat Ordinance Number Date ❑ Preliminary Plat Map .......... Date Approved by Hearing Examiner ❑ Revised Preliminary Plat Map ....... Date Approved by DDES ❑ 5-year Expiration ....... Date OK ❑ Wetland Report / Plans Date Date (Show on engineering cover sheet) ROUTING TO OTHER KING COUNTY SECTIONS Route Date Response Date ❑ Geotechnical Report I Plans Route Date Response Date ❑ Grading Report / Plans Route Date Response Date ❑ Structural Designs / Calculations / Civil Plans I Soils Report (Vaults, Retaining Walls, Bridges) Route Date Response Hate ❑ Landscape / Recreation / Street Tree / Plan Route Date Response Date EngineeringReviewChecklistFORM.doc le-ckkercheck.pdf 10/10/2005 1 of 16 (Continued) ❑ Traffic Improvement Plan / Report Route Date ❑ Tree Retention / Forestry / Plan Route Date ❑ Other Report / Plan Route Date ❑ All required routing stations shown and updated on PRMS OK Activity Number: LD Le V4 Response Date Response Date Response date GENERAL SUBDIVISION REQUIREMENTS ❑ Site plan'layout matches preliminary plat approved by Hearing Examiner (Check for same lot count, tract configuration, road alignments, etc.) ❑ Compliance with conditions of preliminary approval ❑ Compliance with Mitigated Determination of Non -Significance ❑ Tract Table if three or more tracts. Identify, name, size and purpose. ❑ Show and label all SAO tracts, buffers, and 15' BSBL. ❑ Review maximum height of 6-feet for rockeries and retaining walls per KCC 21A.12.030, 110-170, 220) Also show standard note per policy on Web site. ❑ Use updated cover sheet showing designation for highly critical sites per Appendix, D44. ❑ Determine if HPA fisheries permit required — contact CAO staff. ❑ Tree Retention Plans - Show standard plan note (see section policies). SURFACE WATER DESIGN MANUAL (1998) CORE AND SPECIAL REQUIREMENTS OK SWDM ❑ 1.2.1 Core #1 — Evaluate diversion of drainage within subbasins and/or tightline requirements for landslide hazard drainage areas. ❑ 1.22 Core #2 — Off -site analysis. Evaluate adequacy and conclusions. ❑ 1.2.3 Core #3 — Flow control. Determine design standard based upon mapping and/or off -site analysis. Evaluate exemptions from flow control if applicable. ❑ 1.2.6 Core #6 —All drainage facilities and road access shall be located in public tracts, right-of-way and/or drainage easements dedicated to King County. For private facilities, specify the required Declaration of Covenant and drainage easements for final recording. ❑ 1.2.8 Core #8 — Water Quality. Determine design standard based upon mapping and/or off -site analysis. Evaluate exemptions if applicable and untreated areas per page 1-57. ❑ 1.3.1 Special #1 — Area specific requirements. Perform P-suffix search on computer, evaluate grading code restrictions, and review for shared facility drainage plan. ❑ 1.3.2 Special #2 — Floodplain boundaries shown on plans. Engineering ReviewChecklistFORM.doc le-ckkercheck.pdf 10/10/2005 2 of 16 Activity Number: DRAINAGE VARIANCES OK SWDM ❑ 1.4 Activity No. Approval Date Design Issues TECHNICAL INFORMATION REPORT OK SWDM ❑ 2.3.1.1 ❑ Section 1 — Project Overview ❑ Figure 1: TIR Worksheet ❑ Figure 2: Site Location ❑ Figure 3: Drainage Basins ❑ a. Acreage of subbasins ❑ b. Identify all site characteristics ❑ c. Show existing discharge points to and from the site ❑ d. Show routes of existing, construction, and future flows at ail discharge points and downstream hydraulic structures. ❑ e. Use a minimum USGS 1:2400 topographic map as a base ❑ f. Show and cite the length of travel from the farthest upstream end of a proposed storm system in the development to any proposed flow control facility. ❑ Figure 4: Soils ❑ a. Show the project site ❑ b. The area draining to the site ❑ c. The drainage system downstream for the distance of the downstream analysis ❑ Section 2 — Preliminary Conditions Summary with responses ❑ Section 3 — Off -Site Analysis ❑ Section 4 — Flow Control and Water Quality Facility Analysis and Design ❑ Existing Site Hydrology (Part A) ❑ Developed Site Hydrology (Part B) ❑ Performance Standards (Part C) ❑ Flow Control System (Part D) ❑ Water Quality System (Part E) ❑ Section 5 — Conveyance System Design and Analysis ❑ Section 6 — Special Reports and Studies — Geo, Wetlands, Floodplain analysis (4.4.2) ❑ Section 7 — Other Permits (HPA, Special Use, WSDOT, etc.) ❑ Section 8 — Erosion 1 Sedimentation Control Design ❑ Section 9 — Bond Quantities Worksheet and R1D Facility Summary ❑ Section 10 — Maintenance and Operations Manual (Section 10 for privately maintained or special non-standard features Engineering ReviewChecklistFORkdoc le-ckl-ercheck.pdf 10/10/2005 3 of 16 Activity Number: SITE IMPROVEMENT PLANS OK SWDM ❑ 2.3.1.2 ❑ Vertical Datum NAVD 1988 — show benchmark ❑ Horizontal Control NAD 1983/91 ❑ 2.3.1.2 General Plan Format ❑ (1) Sheet size 24" x 36"; quality reproducibles ❑ (2) King Co. Standard Map Symbols; existing 1 proposed (Reference 7A) ❑ (3) Project Information 1 Cover Sheet ❑ a. Title: Project name and DDES file number ❑ b. Table of Contents if more than 3 plan sheets ❑ c. Vicinity Map ❑ d. Name & Phone of Utility field contacts and One Call Number: 1-800-424-5555 (water, sewer, gas, power) ❑ e. Preconstruction 1 Inspection notification requirements ❑ f. Name & Phone of erosion control supervisor ❑ g. Name & Phone of Surveyor ❑ h. Name & Phone of Owner 1 Agent ❑ i. Name & Phone of Applicant ❑ j. Legal description ❑ k. Plan approval block for DDES ❑ I. Name & Phone of engineering firm preparing plans ❑ m. Fire Marshal's approval stamp (if required) ❑ n, Mailbox location approval by U.S. Postal Service ❑ o. List of conditions of preliminary approval on all site improvements ❑ (4) An overall site plan if more than three plan sheets are used ❑ a. The complete property area development ❑ b. Right-of-way information ❑ c. Street names and road classification ❑ d. All project phasing and proposed division boundaries ❑ e. All natural and proposed drainage collection and conveyance systems with catch basin numbers shown ❑ (5) Each sheet and TIR is stamped, signed, and dated by a Professional Engineer licensed in Washington State ❑ (6) Detail Sheets Provided ❑ (7) Title block on each sheet ❑ a. Development title ❑ b. Name, address and phone number of engineering firm ❑ c. Revision block ❑ d. Page numbering ❑ e. Sheet title (e.g., road and drainage, grading, etc.) ❑ (8) King County approval block on each plan sheet ❑ (9) The location and label for each section or other detail shall be provided ❑ (10) Critical Area Setbacks per K.C.C. 21A.24 ❑ (11) All match lines correspond to the sheet reference ❑ (12) Division phase lines with limits of construction Cl (13) Standard Plan Notes -- General, Drainage & Structural notes (Reference 7B) ❑ (14) Survey control plan sheet stamped by licensed PLS in Washington State EngineeringRoviewChecklistFORM.doc le-ckkercheck.pdf 10/10/2005 4 of 16 Activity Number: SITE IMPROVEMENT PLANS (continued) OK SWDM ❑ 2.3.1.2 Plan View: Site Plan and Roadway Elements ❑ (1) Property Lines, RAW lines, roadway widths shown ❑ (2) Existing 1 Proposed road features; CL, edge pavement, edge shoulder, ditches, curb, sidewalk & access pts ❑ (3) Existing 1 Proposed topographic contours @ 2% 5515% slope, 10-'>40% slope ❑ (4) All affected utilities are shown; utility poles marked ❑ (5) All roads and adjoining subdivisions identified ❑ (6) Existing A Proposed RAW dimensioned and shown ❑ (7) Existing 1 Proposed surfacing shown ❑ (8) Scale generally 1"=50' (1"=100' far lots >1 Acre) ❑ 2.3.1.2 Plan View: Drainage Conveyance ❑ Sequentially number all catch basins and curb inlets ❑ Show length, diameter, and material for all pipes, culverts, and stubouts ❑ Label catch basin size and type Cl Show stubout locations for roof drains ❑ Label all drainage easements, access easements, tracts, and building setbacks ❑ Provide flow arrows for drainage direction ❑ 2.3.1.2 Plan View: Other ❑ Show all buildings, property lines, streets, alleys, and easements ❑ Verify condition of public right-of-way ❑ Show structures on abutting properties within 50 feet ❑ Identify fencing for drainage facilities ❑ Provide section details of all retaining walls and rockeries ❑ Show all wells on -site and within 100-feet of site. For well abandonment, include notes referencing DOE procedures. ❑ 2.3.1.2 Profiles: Roadway and Drainage ❑ Existing 1 proposed roadway centerline (CL) at 50' stations increasing, reading from left to right. Show stationing of points of smooth vertical curve, with elevations ❑ Show vertical curve data including stopping sight distance ❑ Show all pipes and detention tanks with slope, length, size and type ❑ Show all pipe inverts and elevations of catch basins or lids ❑ Minimum cover dimensions if less than 2.0' ❑ Indicate roadway stationing and offset for all catchbasins ❑ Show vertical and horizontal scales (vertical 1"=5') ❑ Label all profiles with street names and reference numbers to plan sheet ❑ Show all property boundaries and match line locations ❑ Provide profiles for conveyance systems of 12" and larger pipes or channels other than roadway ditches ❑ Catch basin lids are flush with ground line EngineeringReviewChecklislFORM.doc le-ckkercheck.pdf 10/10/2005 5 of 16 Activity Number: SITE IMPROVEMENT PLANS (continuedl OK SWDM ❑ 2.3.1.2 Plan Details ❑ Provide scale drawing of each pond, vault, or water quality facility. Include all pipe details for size, type, slope, length, etc. ❑ Show existing and final grade contours at 2-foot intervals. Show maximum design water elevation. ❑ Dimension all berm widths ❑ Provide two cross sections through pond, including one section through restrictor ❑ Specify soils and compaction requirements ❑ Show location and detail of emergency overflows, spillways, and bypasses ❑ Specify rock protection 1 energy dissipation details ❑ Provide inverts for all pipes, grates, etc., and spot elevations on pond bottom ❑ Show location of access roads to control manholes and pond 1 forebay bottoms ❑ Provide plan and section views of all energy dissipaters. Specify size and thickness of rock. ❑ Show bollard locations (Typically at entrance to drainage facility and walking trails) ❑ Restrictor and control structures must have section and plan view drawn to scale ❑ 2.3.1.2 Structural Plan Details ❑ Verify that designer is a licensed structural P.E. for vaults or bridges EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL (SWDM Appendix D OK SWDM ❑ 2.3.1.3 General Specifications ❑ Separate plan sheet showing entire site wlfeatures ❑ Show critical areas and buffers in separate tracts ❑ Show existing contours and final grades if scope or work includes grading ❑ Pertinent information from soils report is added to plans ❑ Drainage features identified (streams, wetlands, bogs, springs, seeps, swales, ditches, pipes & depressions) ❑ Utility corridors other than roads shown ❑ Show drainage divides and flow directions ❑ Specify best management practices ❑ Show cut and fill slopes with catch lines indicated ❑ Sufficient conceptual details to convey design intent ❑ Standard ESC plan notes shown on plans (Page D-69) ❑ For grading and structural fill within lot areas — show standard notes for geo hazards (see section policies for geo notes) ❑ D.4.1 Clearing Limits ❑ (1) Delineate clearing limits— colored survey tape maybe used. Critical areas require plastic/ metal safety fence or stake and wire fences. ❑ (2) Provide detail of fencing EngineeringReviewChecklistFORM.doc le-ckl-ercheck.pdf 10/10/2005 6 of 16 Activity Number: uc)k, �:�EDaA 2.3.1.3 EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL (SWDM Appendix D) (continued] leL'�%►Lola ❑ D.4.2 Cover Measures ❑ (1) Specify the type and location of temporary and permanent cover measures. (Mulch, erosion control nets, blankets, plastic, seeding and sodding) ❑ (2) Specify the seed mixes,- fertilizers and soil amendments to be used and application rates ❑ (3) Areas receiving special treatment are specified Qute netting, rock lining or sod) ❑ (4) Soil cover practices and locations of disturbed areas ❑ D.4.3 Perimeter Protection ❑ (1) Specify the location and type of perimeter protection to be used — silt fence, brush barriers, and/or vegetated strips ❑ (2) Provide details and specify type of fabric for silt fence ❑ D.4.4 Traffic Area Stabilization ❑ (1) Show construction entrance with detail (Figure D.4.G) ❑ (2) Show proposed construction roads and parking areas. Specify details for stabilization. ❑ D.4.5 Sediment Retention ❑ (1) Show location of sediment pond or sediment trap. Very small areas can be treated with only perimeter protection (see D.4.3). ❑ (2) Sediment Trap — Can be used for drainage areas of 3 acres or less. Calculate surface area using 2-year design storm. Show detail per Figure DA.H. ❑ (3) Sediment Pond -- Determine pond geometry and show details on plan for required storage, depth, length and width ❑ (4) Show sediment pond cross section and detail (Figures DA.J and K) ❑ (5) Provide details of cell dividers and stabilization techniques for inlet / outlet ❑ (6) Specify mulch or recommended cover of berms & slopes ❑ (7) Specify the 1-foot marker for sediment removal ❑ (8) Indicate catch basins for protection and show design details (Figures D.41 and M) ❑ D.4.6 Surface Water Control ❑ .(1) Show conveyance of all surface water to a sediment pond or trap ❑ (2) Discharge location shall be downslope from disturbed areas ❑ (3) Show details for conveyance with interceptor dike, swales (Figures 0.4.0, P). ❑ (4) For ditches, determine capacity for 10-year storm with 0.5 feet freeboard. Show details for check dams (Figure DA.R). Determine check dam spacing and as needed, show inverts and minimum slopes of open channels. Also show direction of open channel flow. ❑ (5) For pipe slope drains, determine capacity for 10-year storm. Show details per Figure D.4.Q. ❑ (6) Determine level of protection for outlet (rock pad, outfall design, or level spreader). See requirements in D-38 through D-40. ❑ (7) Evaluate off site flows entering the site and assure bypass of disturbed areas EngineedngReviewChecklislFORM.doc le-ckkercheck.pdf 10/10/2005 7 of 16 Activity Number: 2.3.1.3 EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL SWDM Appendix D continued OK SWDM ❑ D.5.1 ESC Report ❑ (1) Show detailed construction sequence (page D-70) ❑ (2) All required calculations and soils reports contained in TIR ❑ D.5,2 Wet Season Requirements ❑ (1) Provide a list of all applicable wet season requirements (details on page D-42) ❑ D.5.3 Critical Area Restrictions ❑ (1) Consider phased construction during the dry season. See special recommendations on page D- 43. ❑ D.5.4 Maintenance ❑ (1) Plans shall list the name, address and phone number of the ESC Supervisor. A sign shall also be posted on the construction site with information for contacting the ESC supervisor, ❑ (2) Determine if site is Highly Critical (Soil Types C or D, 5 acres of disturbance, large areas with slopes >10%, proximity to streams, wetlands, or lakes) ❑ (3) On cover sheet of engineering plans, designate if highly critical site ❑ D.5.7 NPDES Requirements ❑ (1) Determine if project will disturb more than 5 acres ❑ (2) If disturbed area is greater the 5 acres, show the following note on the plans: "No construction or site disturbance for this project may begin before the applicant first obtains a General Permit to Discharge Stormwater Associated with Construction Activity permit from the Washington State Department of Ecology (DOE). For more information or application form, please visit DOE's website at http:Nwww.ecy.wa.gov/biblio/ecy02085.html" ❑ 0.5.8 Forest Practices Permit ❑ (1) Determine if project needs FPA permit. Contact DDES grading section. ❑ (2) Provide a reference note on the cover sheet indicating whether or not an FPA permit has been obtained. ❑ Early Start Plan Review ❑ (1) Standard cover sheet included with Title for Phased Early Start ❑ (2) List the scope of work for early start (scope of work will vary for each project — evaluate clearing, grading for roads, lot grading, utility installation, vault construction, off -site work) ❑ (3) Update the sheet index to identify all plans with updated page numbers ❑ (4) Include standard ESC plan prepared in accordance with all requirements listed above for erosion and sediment control ❑ (5) Include detailed construction sequence and identify ESC supervisor ❑ (6) Show standard erosion control notes ❑ (7) Show early start activity number on all plain sheets Engineering ReviewChecklistFOWdoc le-ckkercheck.pdf M10l2005 8 of 16 Activity Number: DESIGN REQUIREMENTS OK SWDM ❑ 3.2 Runoff Computation ❑ Rational Method required for on -site conveyance (See Table 3.2) ❑ KCRTS used for flow control design ❑ Evaluate correct data: Rainfall region, scale factor, time step, record type, acreages, soil cover groups, and percent impervious ❑ 3.27 For urban areas, unprotected forest modeled as pasture or grass ❑ For rural areas, unprotected forest assumes 50% grass, 50% pasture ❑ All pre -developed grassland modeled as pasture ❑ All post developed grassland modeled as grass ❑ Impervious coverage calculated based upon specific project — clearly summarize types and amounts of impervious ❑ For urban development, impervious for each lot, >= 4,000 sq ft or maximum allowed in zoning code ❑ For rural development, impervious for each lot, >= 8,000 sq ft or maximum allowed in zoning code ❑ Evaluate requirements for modeling with effective impervious area ❑ 3.3.6 Point of compliance — evaluate for on -site bypass and off -site closed depression ❑ 3.3.7 On -site closed depressions and ponding areas ❑ 4.0 Conveyance System Analysis and Design ❑ Conveyance systems are in easements with BSBLs ❑ Off -site easements must be recorded using standard forms (Reference 8H) ❑ Determine which easements are public and private, label and dimension ❑ Pipes are parallel to and alongside property lines ❑ 4.5 Minimum pipe size 12-inch, for private systems may allow 8 inch ❑ Easements for pipes outside of right of way ❑ 4.7 For connecting pipes at structures, match crowns, 80% diameter, or inverts ❑ 4.9 Minimum velocity at full flow 3.0 feet per second ❑ 4.9 Minimum cover for pipes 2 feet ❑ 4.10 Debris barrier for pipes 18-36 inch ❑ 4.27 Outfall design criteria ❑ Surcharges (backwater analysis may be required) ❑ 4.35 Maximum headwater allowed for culverts ❑ 4.51 Bridge, design ❑ 4.69 Floodplain analysis ❑ 4.53 Open channels ❑ 5.0 Flow Control Design ❑ 5.3 Mandatory requirements for roof downspouts in order of preference. Must evaluate feasibility of each. o Infiltration o Dispersion o Perforated stubouts ❑ 5.9 Dispersion system criteria including vegetated flow path ❑ 5.11 Perforated stub out, if used show detail per Fig. 5.1.3.A Enginee ringReviewChecklistFORMAoc le-CM-ercheck.pdf 10/1012005 S of 16 Activity Number: DESIGN REQUIREMENTS (continued) OK SWDM ❑ 5.14 Forested open space flow control BMPs o Show tracts or easements for FOS o Show required notes on plan for plat recording ❑ 5.15 roadway dispersion BMPs, check design criteria ❑ 5.17 BMPs for reducing facility size. Note: Facility sizing credit allowed for dispersion only if fiowpath from roofs ultimately drain to RID facility. ❑ 5.3 Detention Facilities ❑ Emergency overflow— Evaluate flow path for safe and adequate conveyance ❑ Setbacks ❑ Flow -through system ❑ 5.3.1 Detention Ponds ❑ Dam Safety Compliance ❑ Two cross -sections through pond (one x-section to include control structure) ❑ Review pond details in Figures 5.3.1.A and B ❑ Designed as flow -through system ❑ Side slopes interior 3H:1 V or fenced ❑ Vertical interior retaining walls Stamped by licensed structural civil engineer ❑ For pond walls, min. 25% of perimeter vegetated and no steeper than 3:1 ❑ Berms greater than 4 feet require key excavation ❑ Minimum berm width of 6 feet ❑ Primary overflow (control structure with riser). ❑ Secondary Inlet to the control structure ❑ Emergency Overflow Spillway, 100 year developed peak flow ❑ Soil and compaction requirements described (95% modified proctor) ❑ Access road min, turning radius, maximum grade, min. width, fences or gates ❑ Pond sign (Figure 5.3.1.0) ❑ Fencing and planting requirements ❑ Setbacks — 5 feet from tow of exterior slope or 5 feet from water surface for cut slope ❑ 5.3.2 Detention Tanks ❑ Flow -through system required ❑ 6" of dead storage in tank bottom ❑ Minimum pipe diameter of 36" ❑ Materials and structural stability ❑ Control structure per Section 5.3.4 ❑ Buoyancy ❑ Access risers and CBs are spaced properly with max. depth from finished grade to tank invert shall be 20 feet and accessible by maintenance vehicles EngineeringReviewChecklislFORM.doc le-ckkercheck.pdf 10/10/2005 10 of 16 Activity Number: DESIGN REQUIREMENTS iCGntlnued) OK SWDM ❑ 5.3.3 Detention Vaults ❑ Structural package submitted for approval ❑ Flow -through system required ❑ Review design details per Fig. 5.3.3.A. Note: Grate over sump with 2' x 2' hinged access door ❑ Access positioned a maximum of 50 feet from any location. (if over 3 foot cover use cone riser) ❑ Access required to inlet pipe and outlet ❑ Removable 5x10 panel if vault greater than 1250 sq. ft. floor area ❑ Maximum depth from finished grade to vault invert to be 20 feet ❑ Minimum internal height shall be 7 feet, min. width shall be 4 feet min ❑ Ventilation pipes provided in all four corners ❑ 5.3.4 Control Structures ❑ Section and plan view shown to scale ❑ Orifice size and elevation on plans match calculations. Minimum orifice 0.5". (Note: Information Plate details are no longer required — see policy on Web site.) ❑ 5.4 Infiltration Facilities ❑ Appropriate soils logs and testing procedures in TIR ❑ Pond bottom at least 3 feet above seasonal high water ❑ Permeable soil extends minimum 3 feet below bottom of pond ❑ Geotechnical report states suitability and determines design infiltration rate ❑ Overflow route identified with 100-yr overflow conveyance ❑ Spill Control device upstream of facility ❑ Presettling ❑ Review setback requirements, page 5-60. Design water surface setback of 20 feet from external tract, easement or property lines ❑ Show the standard note regarding public rule for in operation facility (see section policies) ❑ 6.0 Water Quality Design ❑ 6.1 Water Quality Menus ❑ 6.2 Water Quality facilities ❑ 6.2.2A Water Quality Sequencing ❑ 6.2.3 Setbacks, slopes and embankments ❑ 6.2.4 Facility Liners ❑ 6.2.5 Flow Splitter Designs ❑ 6.3 Biofiltration Facility ❑ 6.3.1 Biofiltration swales and soil amendments ❑ 6.3.1.1 Methods of Analysis ❑ 6.3.1 Swale geometry, plantings, flow conveyance, high flows, velocity ❑ Road access requirements, page 6-43 ❑ 6.3.4 Filter strip geometry (slopes) EngineedngReviewChecklistFORMAOC le-ckkercheck.pdf 10/10/2005 11 of 16 Activity Number: DESIGN REQUIREMENTS (continued) OK SWDM ❑ 6.4 Wetpool Facility Designs ❑ Wetpool geometry, 2 cells, minimum depth of first cell 4 feet ❑ Flowpath length to width ratio 3:1. Note: If flow path achieved with berms or walls, top of berm must be at 2-year water surface elevation. ❑ 6.4.1.2 Berms, Baffles, Slopes ❑ Inlet/Outlet Design ❑ 6.4.1.1 Access, setbacks, and plantings ❑ 6.4.2 Wetvaults ❑ 6.4.1.1 Sizing basic or large ❑ 6.4.1.1 Berms, Baffles, Slopes ❑ 6.4.2.2 Two cells separated by wall or removable baffle ❑ Vault bottom forms a broad "V" with 5% sideslopes ❑ Inlet is submerged and outlet pipe designed for 100-year overflow ❑ Gravity drain provided if grade allows ❑ Minimum 50 square feet of grate over second cell ❑ 6.4.3 Stormwater Wetlands ❑ 6.4.3.1 Methods of Analysis ❑ 6.4.3.2 Design Criteria - Wetland geometry, liners, access, plantings ❑ 6.4.4 Combination Detention and Wetpool facilities ❑ 6.4.4.1 Methods of Analysis ❑ 6.4.4.2 Design Criteria - Detention and wetpool geometry, berms, baffles, slopes ❑ 6.4.4.2 Access and plantings ❑ 6.5 Media Filtration Facility Designs ❑ 6.5.1 Presettling/pretreatment ❑ 6.5.2 Sandfilters — Basic and Large ❑ 6.5.2.1 Methods of analysis ❑ 6.5.2.2 Design Criteria — Geometry, overflow/bypass, underdrain, and access ❑ 6.5.3 Sandfilter Vaults ❑ 6.5.3.2 Design Criteria — geometry, pretreatment, flow -spreading, energy dissipation ❑ 6.5.3.2 Overflow/bypass, underdrain and access Notes: Enginee ringReviewChecklistFORM.doc le-ckl-ercheck.pdf 10/10/2005 12 of 16 Activity Number:J� KING COUNTY ROAD STANDARDS (1993) GENERAL REgUIREMENTS KCRS 1.03 A, B Off -site and frontage improvements determined by reviewing agency (Vote: For grading permits, the required extent of road improvements must be determined during engineering review. For subdivisions, the requirements are determined during preliminary review. 1.03 D Subdivisions must have recorded public access except for private roads DESIGN REgUIREMENTS 1.08 Road Variances Activity No. Design Issues Approval Date ROAD CLASSIFICATION TABLE Name of Roadway_KCRS Classification OK KCRS ❑ 2.03C Maximum Superelevation (2.05) ❑ 2.03D Horizontal curvature (2.05) ❑ 2.03E Maximum grade (2.11) ❑ 2.03F Stopping Sight Distance (2.05, 2.12) ❑ 2.03G Entering Sight Distance (2.05, 2.13) Engineering ReviewChocklistFORM.doc le-cki-ercheck.pdf 10/10/2005 13 of 16 Activity Number: KING COUNTY ROAD STANDARDS (1993) DESIGN REQUIREMENTS (continued) OK KCRS ❑ 2.03H Minimum pavement width (Note: Footnote 9 - Neighborhood collectors require 36-feet at approach to intersections with arterials) ❑ 2.031 Minimum roadway width ❑ 2.03J Minimum RAW width ❑ 2.03.1 Min. RIW width (Footnote 12 and 2.19B - include 1 foot extra ROW behind curb or sidewalk) ❑ 2.03K Curb or shoulder type road (2.01) ❑ 2.03L Minimum Half -Street width ❑ 2.06 Private Street Design Standards ❑ 2.0667 Verify maximum potential of 16 lots ❑ 2.07 Half Streets ❑ 2.08A Minimum Cul-de-Sac diameters ❑ 2.0813 Maximum Cul-de-Sac length ❑ 2.08E Maximum Cross Slope 6% ❑ 2.08F Bulb island shall be offset 2-feet ❑ 2.09 Alleys ❑ 2.09B Private Access Tracts (Note: Must meet all standards for minor access street, except curb cut driveway design is allowed with property line radii dedication) ❑ 2.10A Angle of intersection between 85 and 95 degrees ❑ 2.10A Intersection curb radius ❑ 2.10A Intersection right-of-way radius ❑ 2.10B Intersection spacing ❑ 2.10C Intersection landing ❑ 2.10E Low Speed Curves ❑ 2.11A Maximum Grade - Use AC for grades >12%, Use PCC for grades >20% ❑ 2.11 B Grade Brakes — maximum 1 % at intersections ❑ 2.12D Intersection stopping sight distance (125' SSD allowed for local access streets) ❑ 2.16 Bus zones - For arterials and neigh. collectors, the designer shall contact metro ❑ 2.18 Intersections with State Highways ❑ 2.20 Single access serving more than 100 lots ❑ 3.01 Driveways ❑ 3.01 Joint Use Driveways ❑ 3.02A Sidewalks (both sides for subcollectors and higher classification) ❑ 3.02B Location and width ❑ 3.05 Handicapped access ramp (Use updated detail from KC Road Engineer, 3/26/04) EngineeringReviewChecklistFORM.doc le-ckl-ercheck.pdf 10/10/2005 14 of 16 Activity Number: KING COUNTY ROAD STANDARDS (1993) DESIGN REQUIREMENTS Lontinuedl OK KCRS ❑ 3.09 School Access - asphalt walkway, sidewalk, or delineated shoulder ❑ 3.10 Bikeways ❑ 3.11 Equestrian Facilities ❑ 4.01 Road Section and Surfacing (drawings 1-001 -. 1-006) Note: Neighborhood collectors require 3-inch asphalt concrete. ❑ 4.01 F Perform saw cut of pavement at fog line ❑ 4.01 F Pavement overlay for widening and channelization (show special note as approved by Development Engineer - see section policies) ❑ 4.02 Residential street design ❑ 4.02 Poor subgrade evaluation ❑ 4.03 Arterial pavement design ❑ 4.05 Pavement markings, channelization, and tapers (Requires DOT review) ❑ 5.01 Rock facings (Dwg. Nos. 5-004 -- 5-007) ❑ 5.02 Side slopes, generally 2HA V ❑ 5.03 Street trees and landscaping ❑ 5.04 Mail boxes (Dwg. Nos. 5-010 — 5-012) ❑ 5.05 Street illumination ❑ 5.06 Survey Monuments to be disturbed are shown ❑ 5.07 Roadway Barricades ❑ 5.08 Bollards for walkways or maintenance roads ❑ 5.11 Roadside obstacles (Note: If variance required for utility pole, the utility company must apply for the variance.) ❑ 6.00 Bridges (minimum width 28-feet) ❑ 7.02A-D Grass -lined, pipe or rock lined, special designed ditch ❑ 7.03A Minimum pipe size 12-inch diameter ❑ 7.03L Beveled ends for culverts in ROW ❑ 7.04A Maximum spacing between catch basins ❑ 7.04E CBs taller than 5' (grate to invert) are Type 11, Max. depth 12-feet per Dwg. 2-005 ❑ 7.05A Vaned grates ❑ 7.05B Through curb inlet frames for sag curves and intersections > 4%. Notes: a) Through curb inlet not used on rolled curb b) See section policies for policy on three flanking inlets ❑ 7.05E All covers and grates shall be locking ❑ 8.02 Utility pole locations and other obstacles ❑ 8.03B Open cuts on existing roadways, patch requirements Engineering ReviewChecklistFORMA0C le-ckl-ercheck.pdf 10/10/2005 15 of 16 Project: Ngy Short Plat Date: September 23, 2006 Client: Teng Ngy Prepared By: M. 09Pn ' CEl No.: 04-32001 Page BOIL® QUANTITIES, FACILITY SUMMARIES & DECLARATION of COVENANT Please see the attached Bond Quantities worksheet, 14201 NE 2000 Street, Suite 200 Phone: (425) 487-1732 Woodinville, WA 98072 (250) 250-7306 Email: cei cornerstone -en com G©aNErR5VONE '^ �� �0 @ N O I N E E R I N [i. I N G. Fax: (425) 487-1734 Web: www.comemtone-engr.com *I 7 3- .qr ri, i -vo r 'i MAJ 1 0 R vas k 0 NOTICE OF PROPOSED LAND USE ACTION King Coanty Departmen! al Development and tnvironmentai Services Land Use Services oi�s n 900 Oakesdale Aren�m:kw , Renton. Washington 9W55.12119 Call 1206j 296.6640 0r (206) 29&72T7 (TTY) Type of Action: Short Subdivision Proposal: Subdivision of a .41 acre lot into 3 residential lots in the R-8 Zone File No.:1.0350031 low F ' ""J �'y ..<i a a;1 It L03SO031 King County Dept. of Development and Environmental Services (DDES) Land Use Services Division (LUSD) 900 nakesdale Av. SW Renton Washington 98055-1219 TYPE 2 FILE CONTENTS 1 LOG -IN SHEET (For Variances, Conditional Uses, Reasonable Uses, Short Plats, Shoreline SD / VA, Binding Site Plan) FILE NO.: L03S0031, PROJECT / FILE NAME: Ngy Short Plat REVIEW PLANNER: Fereshteh Dehkordi REVIEW ENGINEER: Curt Foster APPLICATION FILED: November 14, 2003 A. FV C l7 OWNER(S): Ten Ngy AGENT(S): % COMPLETE APPLICATION DATE: la . 64 PRELIMINARY. FINAL AND RECORDED ACTIONS 1. Notice of Decision Date: 1111,7 f 2. Preliminary Approval Date: 3. Revision: 4. Recording No.: HEARING EXAMINER'S ACTIONS (If Applicable.) If Appeal Filed: `8!(recvd date): Q Appeal Receipt - y . j Pre -Hearing & Hearing Date(s): f/ " q1 15 U Examiner's Action and date signed: reHearing Notice, dated: PreHearing Order, dated: ' 2. Cont' uation, dated: . xaminer's Report, dated: 5. Reconsideration, dated: 6. Appeal Summary, dated: 7 7 z1 ?/'z 2 DDES RECOMMENDATION LETTER NOTICE AND STAFF REPORTS ecommendation Letter: ppeal Report. Addendum Report: S.E.P.A. Requirements if applicable) - EXEM p 1 1. Threshold Determination Type: (DNS / MDNS / DS) 2. Date Determination Issued: 3, 500' Owners / SD / or Agencies Mailing Sent: 4. Appeal Filed on Determination: ❑ - No; ❑ - Yes 5. Appeal Statement(s): From: Date recvd: 6. Appeal Response(s): From: Date sent: NOTICE REQUIREMENTS Notice of Application j a. Affidavit of Posting sent: la Recvd: 3 b. Legal Ads: Seattle Times Date Publishe . 3 Local Dat Published: a C. 500' owners' / SD / agenci s' mai ings sent: Notice of Decision a. 500' owners' / SD / agencies' mailings sent: (, "gv Page I of 3 L03SO031 F. COMPLETE APPLICATION ITEMS 1. 2. ,/3. 4. 8. 9. ,�l•1 ,A2 ,43 14 15 ,47 Date Received: November 14, 2003 Intake Checklist, Application Application Fee Info. Applicant Designation Form: Legal Description Assessor's Maps: Certificate of Water Availability Certificate of Sewer Availability Preliminary Health Approval Certificate of Future Connection Fire District Receipt Site Plan (Platting) Map Legal Lot Proof Sensitive Areas Compliance Affidavit Environmental Checklist Transportation Concurrency Level One Drainage Analysis Other(s): a. ,Q/!/SIT�GG b. , C. 18. Waiver(s): a. , b. IF APPLICABLE TO FILE BEING REVIEWED: G In 19, 20. 21. 22. 23. Right -of -Way Use Permit, File No.: Variance, File No.: Rezone, File No.: Shoreline File No. Others - File No(s). ADDITIONAL PLANS 1 MAPS 1. 2. 3. Conceptual Drainage Plan Wetland Mitigation Plan Other Map(s) a) b) c) d) SPECIAL STUDIES 1. Wetland / Stream Report: 2. GeoTechnical Report: _ 3. Traffic Study: 4, Wildlife Study: 5. Other(s): Page 2 of 3 L03SO031 I. GENERAL CORRESPONDENCE 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. 10. 11. 12. B. 14. 15. 16. 17. 18. 19. 20. 21. 22. 23. 24. 25. 26. 27. 28. 29. 30. 31. 32. 33. 34. 35. 36. 37. 38. 39. 40. 41. 42. 43. 44. 45. Page 3 of 3 King County Department of Development and Environmental Services 900 Oakesdale Avenue Southwest Renton, WA98055-1219 June 18, 2004 Teng Ngy 5563 156`h Avenue SE Bellevue, WA 98006 RE: Preliminary Approval for Short Subdivision No.L03SO031 Dear Mr. Ngy: The Land Use Services Division (LUSD) has completed review of the short subdivision application captioned above. The LUSD finds that the proposed short subdivision complies with the King County Land Segregation Code (Title 19A), Zoning Code (Title 21A), and other applicable codes as specified in King County Code (KCC) 19A.08.060. The short subdivision is granted preliminary approval subject to the Conditions of Preliminary Approval attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference. Any aggrieved party may appeal this decision by the appeal deadline, which is July 6, 2004. The appeal procedure is enclosed for your information. The preliminary approval is valid for a period of'60 months from the date of this letter, unless an appeal is filed. In the event that an appeal is filed, the preliminary approval is, valid for a period of 60 months from the date of the appeal decision. Enclosed are the following: C Notice of Decision Conditions of Preliminary Approval Appeal Procedure If you have any questions regarding this letter, please contact Fereshteh Dehkordi, Program Manager, at (206) 296-7173 and Curt Foster, Engineer, at (206) 296-7106. Sinc erely, 7 x 7p-� Curt Foster, P.E., Senior Engineer Engineering Review Section, LUSD Enclosures cc: Applicant File Mark Olson, Consulting Engineer Tom Tuma, Consulting Surveyor ARic Hudson, Senior Planner Current Planning Section, LUSD Letter.trm/CoverUr2000.SP.doc 3/9/00 King County Department of Development and Environmental Services 900 Oakesdale Avenue SW Renton, WA 98055-1219 CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL File No. L03SO031 File Name: Ngy Short Plat Application Date: November 14, 2003 Revision Date: None This short subdivision received November 14, 2003 is granted preliminary approval subject to the following Conditions of Approval. These conditions are based on a field visit and current information the applicant has provided about the short subdivision property. Occasionally, in'satisfying the Conditions of Approval, a more definitive land use limitation of the property may be revealed. New information (such as final Health approval or sensitive areas review) may require additional conditions and may reduce the number of lots. Final approval will be granted after compliance with the Conditions of Approval. Key codes and guidelines have been noted to provide guidance in preparing the required plans and other documents. Compliance with some of the following conditions will require that engineering plans be prepared by a professional civil engineer licensed in the State of Washington. 1. Title 19A A. The short subdivision shall comply with all provisions of Title 19A. B. The final review process•must be completed prior to recording of the short subdivision. The Department of Development and Environmental Services (DDES) strongly recommends the Final Short Plat be submitted at least one year prior to the expiration date_ ofthe _project. The Final Short Plat submittal package includes: 1. A surveyed map page (four sets) including lot area closure calculations; 2. Final health approval from the King County Health Department (different from preliminary health approval); 3. A current short plat certificate and supporting documents (easements, etc.); 4. Payment of the Final Short Plat submittal fee; 5. A copy of this letter (preliminary approval letter). A licensed land surveyor shall be hired to prepare the final short subdivision documents. These documents shall comply with all of the following conditions for final approval: C. All persons having an ownership interest in the subject property are required to sign the final short subdivision. D. If modifications to the approved preliminary site plan (Attachment 1) are needed to accomplish engineering design or final short plat, then a revised preliminary site plan shall be submitted to DDES for review and approval. The revised site plans shall be submitted with the engineering plans or the final short plat submittal. 2. Surface Water Management (KCC 9) 1998 King County Surface Water Design Manual (SWDM) A. This short -subdivision proposal is subject to Full Drainage Review (Section 1.1.2.3). Final short subdivision approval shall require full compliance with drainage provisions and storm drainage requirements of this section. Compliance may result in reducing the number and/or location of lots shown on the approved preliminary short subdivision. The conditions outlined below are site -specific drainage conditions: (1) Core Requirement #1 - Discharge at the Natural Location Note: A drainage adjustment is required to pump drainage from the southwest corned to the ditch along t05'h Avenue Southeast (SWDM Section 1.2.4.3). Approval is anticipated. (2) Core Requirement #2 - Off -Site Analysis (3) Core Requirement #3 - Flow Control (4) Core Requirement #4 - Conveyance System Notes; 1) Drainage easements are required across Lot 2 allowing a minimum undisturbed flow path of 25 feet for BMP's located on Lots 1 and 3. 2) Additionally, an easement is required across Lots 2 and 3 for the drainage pumped back to 105'h Avenue SE (5) Core Requirement #5 - Erosion & Sedimentation Control (6) Core Requirement #6 - Maintenance and Operation (7) Core Requirement #7 - Financial Guarantees & Liability (8) Core Requirement #8 - Water Quality (S 1) Special Requirement #1 - Other Adopted Requirements Notes: 1) KCC 16.82.150 D (Seasonal Clearing Restriction) 2) SC-P3 (Clearing and Grading) 3) SO-220 (Significant Trees) B. A professional civil engineer licensed in the State of Washington shall prepare a Technical Information Report and/or engineering plans per Chapter 2, of the 1998 King County Surface Water Design.Manual. 3. Health (KCC 13) This project is exempt from further King County Heath Department review. However, if improvements are required from the Sewer and/or the Water District, then verification shall be required from said District(s) that the improvements have been bonded and/or installed, prior to final recording of the short plat. 4. Road Standards (KCC 14) 1993 King County Road Standards, Ordinance 11187 Final short subdivision approval shall require full compliance with the provisions set forth in the King County Road Standards including engineering plans for all road improvements. The engineering plans shall be prepared by a professional civil engineer licensed in the State of Washington. DDES strongly recommends the engineering plans be submitted at least two years prior to the exn_iration date of the rp oLet. The following conditions are road requirements for this short subdivision and shall be satisfied, unless a variance is obtained or unless otherwise approved by DDES (Section 1.03). A. That portion of the west half of 105`'' Avenue SE adjoining the subject property shall be improved with curb gutter and sidewalk ('Urban subaccess standard, KCRS Section 2.03). B. The on -site road (serving more than 2 lots) shall be constructed to private minor access standards (KCRS Section 2.06). The tract shall be extended into the property to the point that adequately serves the front lots (20 foot minimum). The road shall be located in a private access tract (PAT) with undivided ownership to the lots it serves, and the lot owners shall be responsible for its maintenance. A panhandle may be extended from Lot 2 to the PAT, C. The following notes shall be shown on the final recorded short subdivision: (1) Warning: King County has no responsibility to b«iid, improve, maintain or otherwise service the private roads contained within or providing service to the property described in this short subdivision. (2) All private easements and/or tracts to be maintained, repaired, and/or rebuilt by the owners of the parcels having legal access therefrom and their heirs, assigns or successors, unless and until such roads are improved to King County standards and are dedicated and accepted by King County for maintenance. D. All restrictions, easements, tracts, and their purpose shall be shown on the final recorded short subdivision. 5. Building and Construction Standards (Title 16) Grading. The applicant shall comply with all applicable provisions of KCC 16.82. 6. Fire Code (KCC 17) Section 902 of the 1997 Edition of Uniform Fire Code The Fire Engineering approval has been granted with no additional conditions 7. Zoning Code (KCC 21A) A. Density and Dimensions (KCC 21A.12) All lots shall meet the density and dimensions requirements of the R-8 zone classification or shall be as shown on the face of the approved preliminary short subdivision, whichever is larger. Minor revisions to the short subdivision, which do not result in substantial changes and/or do not create additional lots may be approved at the discretion of LUSD. The existing House must meet the setback requirements per KCC 21A. 12. 030. D. Street Trees (KCC 2IA. 16) Street trees shall be provided along that portion of the right-of-way for 105`h Avenue SE abutting the subject property, pursuant to the provisions of KCC 2IA. 16.050(E) and KCC 21 A,16.190, unless existing trees are shown to be equivalent to the requirement of Code. See note below. The required street trees shall be designed as to location and spacing on the final plan submittal. The street trees must be installed and inspected, or a performance bond posted, prior to recording of the plat. If a performance bond is posted, the street trees must be installed and inspected within one year of recording of the plat. At the time of inspection, if the trees are found to be installed per the approved plan, a maintenance bond must be submitted, or the performance bond replaced with a maintenance bond, and held for one year. After one year, the maintenance bond may be released after DDES has completeda. second inspection and determined that the trees have been kept healthy and thriving. NOTE: A. KCC 21A.16.050 Landscaping - street frontages. The average width of perimeter landscaping along street frontages shall be provided as follows: For single-family subdivisions: 1. Trees shall be planted at the rate of one tree for every 40 feet of frontage along a -neighborhood collector street or arterial street. 2. The trees shall be: a. Located within the street right-of-way if permitted by the custodial state or local agency; b. No more than 20 feet from the street right-of-way line when located within a lot; c. Maintained by the adjacent landowner unless part of a County maintenance program; and d. A species approved by the County if located within the street right-of-way and compatible with overhead utility lines. 3. The trees may be spread at irregular intervals in order to accommodate sight distance requirements for driveways and intersections. B. KCC 21A.16.190 Financial guarantees. Financial guarantees shall be required consistent with the provisions of Title 27A. 9. Road Mitigation Payment System The applicant shall comply with Road Mitigation Payment System (MPS), by paying the required MPS fee as determined by King County Department of Transportation, plus an administrative fee. The applicant has an option to either: l . Pay the MPS fee at final short subdivision recording and the MPS administrative fee at final short subdivision application, or 2. Pay the MPS fee at building permit issuance and the MPS administrative fee at the time of building permit application. If option i is chosen, then the following note shall be shown on the final short plat: MPS FEE NOTICE: All fees required by King County code 14.75, Mitigation Payment System (MPS) have been paid. If option 2 is chosen, then the following note shall be shown on the final short plat: MPS FEE NOTICE: This short plat is'subject to King County Code No. 14.75, King County Road Mitigation Payment System (MPS). The MPS fees plus the MPS administrative fee shall be paid at the time of building permit application at the rate in effect at that time. 10. State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA) This short subdivision was exempt from the provision of the State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA). 11. Other Considerations Preliminary approval of this application does not limit the applicant's responsibility to obtain any required permit or license from the State or other regulatory body. This may include obtaining a forest practice permit from the Washington State Department of Natural Resources for tree removal. t DEPARAAFHT or DMOPMLNI ANY WvNl..we.1�w x•nua _ . E—In and W..d d y.f. tx. EapMnN aw aF-4 0.1 .f 20— x M.• , L d u« 6� ok� SCALE:. - - 4-A.d and .P ;. M W. _ a•y N o"H Auu.r PORThON OF n..0.9-4 V.0 r w... l N M. ooe7D5—m 3—o, NEJ%4 OF. SW 1/4 of SEC 2 I.TW 23 N.RG 5 E. W.K ik ty . T T r 7,614 pR I . 0,17 Qo $mw - - - N Ea1d4e• W + +' NB8lmu .... Y WATER uAW EAmII n AECORORLC NO, 45136X5 I# LEGAL. DESMPT10fi . EAST 1/Z OF LOT 10 1N E' = 2 OF AKER'S FAW HR 0. AS PER '. PLAT REGCROEO IN YMUHE 40 CF PLATS PACE 27 REDOIES Or I,= COUHM, . . . eSITUATE s1 THE ODIPITY Or K0{0. STATE OF WASKHVM. Ex. HwsE ° +J1 _ 3raw• s '51846' E SE i721�D STREET + 'T`== I +Fa. SURVEY NOTES EISII usm WKON TOTAL VAT" 071LA10L0 IhiHOO u5EE' ✓ TRA+IFAL � TS AH GLE3 dl m-000 { I JO' VAC 332-13D-080 DATE OF xUR1i11 AP13. 2003 1 BAm OF iEA 44 Rp51lJ1Y•E• SE "'. SIm, ALAT OF AIOA'S FARL H0. 5 0 CMAIR0 MM A7 SE MRFIER OF PROPERTY RW a" - 200m (soak ORMO k •; .. 1 . , OWNER 10,0 OPER TE)rp NOY ANO WOREHY NOY 963 156th AYE Si 1 9L IZVUE, WA 98006 425-013-3402 4 LAND SURVEYQR •TOUEASURVEYORS E32S IRIt PLACE SUITE E-102- SHINOTIXJ 98032 425-25I-GS6i ZONING INFORMATION ISalV4r Wf y�y� F ... •7M TTTGQpTALlC FACE ] 41'ACRES ZONE LOTS RBSO' . ROAD AREA 0 10. +111 SMALLEST LOT 3410 S.F N g�d�• _ I PROPOSED USE SINM.0 FAMILY HOME •�� . SOIL TYPE ALDERDWOOD APC 1 - +,• DRAINAGE MELL DRAINED rrr���3��� 4ECETAtt0N GRAM I k, r LE END 1 g Q CS {TYPE 1) o TELEPHONE CAM I 9 S� SANITARY !EWER MH 9PN I 3.410. aq.fl .1 - I [$ �, w WATER HALVE CONIFER TREE I`.•_• A07 ocin', I , + w 1 10p� WATER WCTER/SERVICE O 0Ed0V0l1S 1RE€ PRE HYDRANT MAL DOM UTRITY POLE + PK NAIL 12$41' 1 -.l y ® F-- WY WIRE g HON IN CASE/ T� 3tY t • y �. . _ ... - P REDA/ PIPE WEX Ex HSE � I � . I. ct0® S£ 772ND 57R£ _ _ _ a �_ H 56b3'1E. IeVS OF 0i EARHO)' LAND SURVEYOR'S CERTIFICATE NGY SHORT PLAT AVE SE k Snort P1.1 car uy r.pre..nla o _n y mv44 by roUMA EN'M 003 105th -� under my dlro"- 0 conlormanp with the & LAND SUR WA. 98055 -Uk"entn o1 the apprpriet. Stcle Pnd Cwnty,h2003 + rnfr.A1A2 arlce—wr• ur,+a 4Y ws "� 7 kjRENTON, PATEIl1� FERRUARY 2002 "%-001-031 S0031 ATTACHMENT { R i I Transmitted to the following Parties of Record for short plat L03SO031: James Donaldson 17003 105`' Ave SE Renton, WA 98055 Rebecca Lind, City of Renton 1055 S. Grady Way Renton, WA 98055 Tim McCannon 17007 105`h Ave SE Renton, WA 98055 Tom Touma, Touma Engineers 6632 1915` Place, #E-102 Kent, WA 98032 Fereshteh Dehlcordi, Project Manager 11, DDES Land Use Services Division Curt Foster, Sr. Engineer, DDES Land Use Services Division Rich Hudson, Program Manager III, DDES Land Use Services Division ATTACHMENT A RIGHT TO APPEAL This action may be appealed in writing to the King County Hearing Examiner, with a fee of $250.00 (check payable to King County Office of Finance), As required by KCC 20.20.090 and 20.24.090, the appeal period shall be fourteen (14) calendar days and shall commence on the third day after the notice of decision is mailed. Filing an appeal requires actual delivery to the King County Land Use Services Division prior to the close of business (4:30 p.m.) on the date due. Prior mailing is not sufficient if actual receipt by the Division does not occur within the applicable time period. The Examiner does not have authority to extend the time period unless the Division is not open on the specified closing date, in which event delivery prior to the close of business on the next business day is sufficient to meet the filing requirement. If a timely Notice of Appeal has been filed, the appellant shall file a statement of appeal within a 21-day calendar period commencing three days after the notice of decision is mailed. The statement of appeal shall identify the decision being appealed (including file number) and the alleged errors in that decision. The statement of appeal shall state: 1) specific reasons why the decision should be reversed or modified; and 2) the harm suffered or anticipated by the appellant, and the relief sought. The scope of an appeal shall be based on matters or issues raised in the statement of appeal. Failure to timely file a notice of appeal, appeal fee, or statement of appeal deprives the Examiner of jurisdiction to consider the appeal. Appeals must be submitted to the Department of Development and Environmental Services, addressed as follows: LAND USE APPEAL Land Use Services Division Department of Development and Environmental Services B1ackRiver Corporate Park 900 Oakesdale Avenue Southwest Renton, WA 98055-1219 A request for a pre -hearing conference may be made by any party. For more information regarding appeal proceedings and pre -hearing conferences, please contact the Office of the Examiner for a Citizens' Guide to the Examiner hearings and/or read KCC 20.20 and 20.24. ti CITY OF RENTON DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY & ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT MEMORANDUM Date: November 6, 2009 To: City Clerk's Office From: Stacy M. Tucker Subject: Land Use File Closeout Please complete the following information to facilitate project closeout and indexing by the City Clerk's Offire_ Project Name: NGY SHORT PLAT LUA (file) Number: LUA-09-028 Cross -References: AKA's: KC File# L03SO031 Project Manager: Acceptance Date: December 11, 2003 Applicant: Teng Ngy Owner: Teng Ngy Contact: Teng Ngy PID Number: 008700133 ERC Decision Date: ERC Appeal Date: Administrative Approval: 11/14/2003 Appeal Period Ends: Public Hearing Date: Date Appealed to HEX: By Whom: HEX Decision: KC Date: September 17, 2004 Date Appealed to Council: By Whom: Council Decision: Date; Mylar Recording Number: Project Description: Subdivision of a .41 acre parcel into 3 residential single-family lots in the R-8 zone. 0 Location: 17003 -1051h Ave SE Comments: ' J 140' DEPARiMW OF DEJ�LbpuW1 ANt+wvucvrvNcnirti acn M.•�.. Eran,wke aw'cavrow!\�iBS d°r 20_.__ uaaq.r, Law U.. DIM.ip,� Ea k..d and '+P;-4 20— LEGAL. DESCRIF FAST 1/2 OF LOT 10 IN PLAT RECORDED 1N VOt� Mm COUNTY, ERMbOd and aPP—d MI. __ day nr --- _Y...�� 20 A� SCALE: Daub Am" PORTION OF Aa.ount Numb. 005700-0133-ot INC 1/4 OF SW 1/4 of SEC 29.TM 23 NAG 5 E. WJA 2 OF AKER•S FARM No. 5, AS PER OF PLATS, PACE 27, RECARDS OF I Fx HOUSE J 19B S 58Ta'ra• E: . S£ 172lID SIRED I 1 i SURVEY NOTES. L I f INSTRUMENT: NIXON TOTAL STATION OTMAIOLG I '' ! METHOD USED: FM.D TRAVERSE MTN ACTUAL 30' I f I FMA MEAMJR 3AENM AND ANGLES + 30• WAC 332-130--090 'I DATE OF SURVEY` APRt• =3 SA5T5 OF BEFRiNQ N6fltL)WL SE t724D STREET I PLAT OF AKER'S FARM N0. 5 BENCHMARK: SSMN AT SE CORNER OF PROPERTY ' 1 f Ir `` 06 RIM ELEV - 200.39 (SOOTS CREDO) + I.. I 0 ER/DMOPER NOY AND MORENY NGY t., 56 156th AVE S£ WA 98006 53-3402 D SURVEYOR f MAF7iCINEERg:iEtA•a1ND Sl1RVEYO "f i� m 1 1 ,, 2 S 191irt PLACE SUITE E-102" pp WASHINCTT3Ff 98032 � c .!I �'-' I' • .. .. 425-251-OBfiS `�`' ING INFORMATION I 1 2D4 ToACREAGE O.41 ACRES �J I T LOTS_ 3 LOTS 01 I ZONES R8S0 I� FWL4DAREA 0 LOT 3410 S.F OPOSED USE SINGLE j FAMILY HOME TYPE ALDERDWOOD AgC ORA OE WELL ORAINEp ATION CRASS ! �u I LEGEND 111 ` ® C8 (7YPE 1) TELEPHONE CABIN ARY SEWER MH j SIGN WA ALVE CONIFER TREE f WA /SERVICE a DECIDUOUS TREE +I RANT o' MAIL BOX - o U PCRf + PK NAIL ! y ® E— GUY fD MON IN CASE/ aw 1 I o EX REBAR / PIPE 30' .... AS NOTED qryplatmailing 06/15/2009 LOW � �Y, i v", �77 17001. 105TH AVE SE NGY SHORT PLAT 17003— 105TH AVE SE_ WG-7§-H—&-R—T PLAT 17005 105TH AVE SE... 'NGY SHORT PLAT Page 1 1 p a� °f Rent 14-Jul-07 nnIng plvr5jon City of Renton jut 16 200E Department of Community & Economic Development n Jennifer Henning u�a Planning Manager ��4jj/�/L io Subject:17003 105th Ave Snort plat LRenton File No:LUA 09-028-- Dear Jennifer: I would like to ask the City of Renton to send me the money I have left in the acount. This money was sent from King Co fwhen the county transferred the file to the City of Renton. Please email me at .tengngy@comcast.net or call me at 206-351-1995 Best regards Teng g N 17003 105th Ave SE Renton, WA 98055 King County Department of Development and Environmental Services 900 Oakesdate Avenue Southwest Renton, WA 98055-1219 .Tune 18, 2004 Teng Ngy 5563 1561h Avenue SE Bellevue, WA 98006 RE: ' Preliminaryy Approval for Short Subdivision No.LWS0031 Dear Mr. Ngy: The Land Use Services Division (LUSD) has completed review of the short subdivision application captioned above. The LUSD finds that the proposed short subdivision complies with the King County Land Segregation Code (Title 19A), Zoning Code (Title 21 A), and other applicable codes as specified in King County Code (KCC) 19A.08.060. The short subdivision is granted preliminary approval subject to the Conditions of Preliminary Approval attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference. Any aggrieved party may appeal this decision by the appeal deadline, which is July 6, 2004. The appeal procedure is enclosed for your information. The preliminary approval is valid for a period of 60 months from the date of this letter, unless an appeal is filed. In the event that an appeal is filed, the preliminary approval is valid for a period of 60 months from the date of the appeal decision. Enclosed are the following: G Notice of Decision o Conditions of Preliminary Approval e Appeal Procedure If you have any questions regarding this letter, please contact Fereshteh Dehkordi, Program Manager, at (206) 296-7173 and Curt Foster, Engineer, at (206) 296-7106. Sincerely, Curt Foster, P.E., Senior Engineer Engineering Review Section, LUSD Enclosures cc: Applicant File Mark Olson, Consulting Engineer Tom Tuma, Consulting Surveyor Letter.Erm/CoverLtr2000.9P.doc 3/9/00 Rich Hudson, Senior Planner Current Planning Section, LUSD FILE Copy aA� � d King County Department of Development and Environmental Services 900 Oakesdale Avenoe SW Renton, WA 98055-1219 CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL File No. L03SO031 File Name: Ngy Short Plat Application Date: November 14, 2003 Revision Date: None This short subdivision received November 14, 2003 is granted preliminary approval subject to the following Conditions of Approval. These conditions are based on a field visit and current information the applicant has provided about the short subdivision property. Occasionally, in'satisfying the Conditions of Approval, a more definitive land use limitation of the property may be revealed. New information (such as final Health approval or sensitive areas review) may require additional conditions and may reduce the number of lots. Final approval will be granted after compliance with the Conditions of Approval. Key codes and guidelines have been noted to provide guidance in preparing the required plans and other documents. Compliance with some of the following conditions will require that engineering plans be prepared by a professional civil engineer licensed in the State of Washington. 1. Title 19A A. The short subdivision shall comply with all provisions of Title 19A. B. The final review process must be completed prior to recording of the short subdivision. The Department of Development and Environmental Services (DDES) strongly recommends the Final Short Plat be submitted at least one year prior to the expiration date of the project. The Final Short Plat submittal package includes: 1. A surveyed map page (four sets) including lot area closure calculations; 2. Final health approval from the King County Health Department (different from preliminary health approval); 3. A current short plat certificate and supporting documents (easements, etc.); 4. Payment of the Final Short Plat submittal fee; 5. A copy of this letter (preliminary approval letter). A licensed land surveyor shall be hired to prepare the final short subdivision documents. These documents shall comply with all of the following conditions for final approval: C. All persons having an ownership interest in the subject property are required to sign the final short subdivision. D. If modifications to the approved preliminary site plan (Attachment 1) are needed to accomplish engineering design or final short plat, then a revised preliminary site plan shall be submitted to DDES for review and approval. The revised site plans shall be submitted with the engineering plans or the final short plat submittal. 2. Surface Water Management (KCC 9) 1998 King County Surface Water Design Manual (SWDM) A. This short subdivision proposal is subject to Full Drainage Review (Section 1,1.2.3). Final short subdivision approval shall require full compliance with drainage provisions and storm drainage requirements of this section. Compliance may result in reducing the number and/or location of lots shown on the approved preliminary short subdivision. The conditions outlined below are site -specific drainage conditions: (1) Core Requirement #1 - Discharge at the Natural Location Note: A drainage adjustment is required to pump drainage from the southwest corned to the ditch along 105'h Avenue Southeast (SWDM Section 1.2.4.3). Approval is anticipated. (2) Core Requirement #2 - Off -Site Analysis (3) Core Requirement #3 - Flow Control (4) Core Requirement #4 - Conveyance System Notes: 1) Drainage easements are required across Lot 2 allowing a minimum undisturbed flow path of 25 feet for BMP's located on Lots 1 and 3. 2) Additionally, an easement is required across Lots 2 and 3 for the drainage pumped back to 105`h Avenue SE (5) Core Requirement #5 - Erosion & Sedimentation Control (6) Core Requirement #6 - Maintenance and Operation (7) Core Requirement #7 - Financial Guarantees & Liability (8) Core Requirement #8 - Water Quality (S 1) Special Requirement #1 - Other Adopted Requirements Notes: 1) KCC 16,82.150 D (Seasonal Clearing Restriction) 2) SC-P3 (Clearing and Grading) 3) SO-220 (Significant Trees) B. A professional civil engineer licensed in the State of Washington shall prepare a Technical Information Report and/or engineering plans per Chapter 2, of the 1998 King County Surface Water Design.Manual. 3. Health (KCC 13) This project is exempt from further King County Heath Department review. However, if improvements are required from the Sewer and/or the Water District, then verification shall be required from said District(s) that the improvements have been bonded and/or installed, prior to final recording of the short plat. 4. Road Standards (KCC 14) 1993 King County Road Standards, Ordinance 11187 Final short subdivision approval shall require full compliance with the provisions set forth in the King County Road Standards including engineering plans for all road improvements. The engineering plans shall be prepared by a professional civil engineer -licensed in the State of Washington. DDES strongly recommends the engineering _ _plans be submitted at least two years prior to the expiration date of the project. The following conditions are road requirements for this short subdivision and shall be satisfied, unless a variance is obtained or unless otherwise approved by DDES (Section 1.03). A. That portion of the west half of 105°' Avenue SE adjoining the subject property shall be improved with curb gutter and sidewalk (urban subaccess standard, KCRS Section 2.03). B. The on -site road (serving more than 2 lots) shall be constructed to private minor access standards (KCRS Section 2.06). The tract shall be extended into the property to the point that adequately serves the front lots (20 foot minimum). The road shall be located in a private access tract (PAT) with undivided ownership to the lots it serves, and the lot owners shall be responsible for its maintenance. A panhandle may be extended from Lot 2 to the PAT. C. The following notes shall be shown on the final recorded short subdivision: (1) Warning: King County has no responsibility to build, improve, maintain or otherwise service the private roads contained within or providing service to the property described in this short subdivision. (2) All private easements and/or tracts to be maintained, repaired, and/or rebuilt by the owners of the parcels having legal access therefrom and their heirs, assigns or successors, unless and until such roads are improved to King County standards and are dedicated and accepted by King County for maintenance. D. All restrictions, easements, tracts, and their purpose shall be shown on the final recorded short subdivision. 5. Building and Construction Standards (Title 16) Grading. The applicant shall comply with all applicable provisions of KCC 16.82. 6. Fire Code (KCC 17) Section 902 of the 1997 Edition of Uniform Fire Code The Fire Engineering approval has been granted with no'additional conditions 7. Zoning Code (KCC 21A) A. Density and Dimensions (KCC 2IA. 12) All lots shall meet the density and dimensions requirements of the R-8 zone classification or shall be as shown on the face of the approved preliminary short subdivision, whichever is larger. Minor revisions to the short subdivision, which do not result in substantial changes and/or do not create additional lots may be approved at the discretion of LUSD. The existing House must meet the setback requirements per KCC 21 A. 12. 030. D. Street Trees (KCC 21 A.16) Street trees shall be provided along that portion of the right-of-way for 105'h Avenue SE abutting the subject property, pursuant to the provisions of KCC 21 A.16.050(E) and KCC 21 A.16.190, unless existing trees are shown to be equivalent to the requirement of Code. See note below. The required street trees shall be designed as to location and spacing on the final plan submittal. The street trees must be installed and inspected, or a performance bond posted, prior to recording of the plat. If a performance bond is posted, the street trees must be installed and inspected within one year of recording of the plat. At the time of inspection, if the trees are found to be installed per the approved plan, a maintenance bond must be submitted, or the performance bond replaced with a maintenance bond, and held for one year. After one year, the maintenance bond may be released after DDES has completed a second inspection and determined that the trees have been kept healthy and thriving. NOTE: A. KCC 21A.16.050 Landscaping-- street frontages. The average width of perimeter landscaping along street frontages shall be provided as follows: For single-family subdivisions: I , Trees shall be planted at the rate of one tree for every 40 feet of frontage along a neighborhood collector street or arterial street. 2, The trees shall be: a. Located within the street right-of-way if permitted by the custodial state or local agency; b. No more than 20 feet from the street right-of-way line when located within a lot; c. Maintained by the adjacent landowner unless part of a County maintenance program; and d. A species approved by the County if located within the street right -of --way and compatible with overhead utility lines, 3. The trees may be spread at irregular intervals in order to accommodate sight distance requirements for driveways and intersections. B. KCC 21A.16.190 Financial guarantees. Financial guarantees shall be required consistent with the provisions of Title 27A. 9. Road Mitigation Payment System The applicant shall comply with Road Mitigation Payment System (MPS), by paying the required MPS fee as determined by King County Department of Transportation, plus an administrative fee. The applicant has an option to either: 1. Pay the MPS fee at final short subdivision recording and the MPS administrative fee at final short subdivision application, or 2. Pay the MPS fee at building permit issuance and the MPS administrative fee at the time of building permit application. If option 1 is chosen, then the following note shall be shown on the final short plat: MPS FEE NOTICE: All fees required by King County code 14.75, Mitigation Payment System (MPS) have been paid. If option 2 is chosen, then the following note shall be shown on the final short plat: MPS FEE NOTICE: This short plat is'subject to King County Code No. 14.75, King County Road Mitigation Payment System (MPS), The MPS fees plus the MPS administrative fee shall be paid at the time of building permit application at the rate in effect at that time. 10. State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA) This short subdivision was exempt from the provision of the State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA). 11. Other Considerations Preliminary approval of this application does not limit the applicant's responsibility to obtain any required permit or license from the State or other regulatory body. This may include obtaining a forest practice permit from the Washington State Department of Natural Resources for tree removal. L DEPARTMENT OF DEYELGPMwI mo F�ya4pN aJ'rpwW bM Nd N E°•« E-114 pry row-4 :hh d°y N �--�- Nu:•nr. IMrN UM 4v,lew 4hbNn ;a�Mur-- -- .- _.—_ • Jvf4.C. O�IrA«� PORTION OF "-p—ri F.04. w l ++ww., GDa7Go-m o1 NE' 1/4 OF. SW 1/4 of SEC 4SYM. 23 N,RG 5 E, WA 4 . • 7� � Y i °' +f 1 EY N W I 1 i / 1, ' � f � 7a10. •4rL ! � 77 Ii 1.:7 -.. , I. I .1,g 7.1. I A, 1 . f f IM414r y LOT �' '2 et _ + 1• { 0.15:°pq yI + i i g� r LdaC,3 I . olY sr f I ,t SURVEY NOTES �` IL•, INTI ILL TOTAL STA1 I METH US FV IIEIIL4D USEyc FIELD TRAVERSE TMT11 ACTUAL WI ACTUAL 30' F1F1D IF1l1S AND ANGLES MAc 200-400 DATE CF SURViN MM.M.20D3 I 11ASIS OF ElENaN@ NASA rL SE 172M STAFFS r .! I PLAT OF AIWS FARM N0. 5 J-W BERCNNAIK FSIM1 AT SE OOFOIEA OF PROPERTY I 1 --`Iw PLM E1FY.- 205-'% (SON CF DO k •. .. .I OWNER/DEVEI.OPER I TRIO NOY ANO MORENY NCY I. 1 5503 ISBth AVE SE r LAND SUR.VF2k •-MUMA ENCItiEEA : .4AMO SURVEYORS 1 ! I FM 5 19t•t PLACE SIM E-102' RENT, WASISNGTDN 98032 425-251-0e55 . I j , ZONING INFORMATION 1 I Y TOTAL ACREAGE 0.41 'ACRES• TKT L LOTS 3 LOTS �.1 + - Z 1 Paso• . +G J n 1 ROAD AREA 0 SMALLEST LOT 3410 Sr PROPOSED USE SINGLE FAMILY HOME SM TYPE ALDERDw000 AOC D"NAGE MEIl. DRANO . I VEGEFARDN GRASS r LEGEND GCB (TYPE 1) d TELEPHONE CA& SANITARY WVM MN SICK WATER HALVE CONIFER TREE 1 + WA TER kETER/"„ERVICE DECIDUOUS T U '� T 'n MAL BOX' UTILITY POLE + Px NAIL . Nf3�T 11 12f3:41 I G I� F GUY TMRE 0 MQN IN CASE/ J WATER MAN EASE];D![ i . RECORDING RO T - 30 r 9 �. . _ ... - ° N / PIPE EX NOOSE• EY .. I OTEO ,p .. -.. AR LEGAL DESCRIPTION 'r� �. .. '..,.EAST IAGF LOT 14 IN aLoaL 2 OF M�R'S FARM Na4 A3 PER .. I .: PUT RDXRR0'ED IN V00, E 40 OF PLATS, PAW 27. RECDRDS.or NO'i 1 S 7D0.1 w �VillAtE N COLIM*PN THE TY Or STATE OF WASIANG79IL Sr 1711'1D O.D,Es, ; '^' " 'Ii rts'pYtY c,ieun ar13EIwT+a>' ' LAND SURVEYOR'S CERTIFICATE NGY SHORT PLAT b Short Plal rr4ctLY rapr4..nb ° Y mad4 br TOIJAM EN °' 17003 105th AVE SE c°- °M• a —d- my dlr•etr°n h o°ntormma. *$th th. � LA4ND sf1R RENTON WA. 9$055 •o v mta °1 the opproprfat° Stuto'and C°Unty, ' Slotut• and Inane• PT� SwIw/YAOtd' �tTl-GVil 3vrr r- k vt D1Mv. OY DAN T �� 2602 JOB 439-: G1-031 L03.SQQ3 NARY u 64 '��A , a4c0. BY SCALE ' .. ... . SHEET C°rlllkati N. _ MHT f' 20, 1 OF I L'. ATTACHMENT I . Transmitted to the following Parties of Record for short plat L03SO031: James Donaldson 17003 105"' Ave SE Renton, WA 98055 Rebecca Lind, City of Renton 1055 S. Grady Way Renton, WA 98055 Tim McCannon 17007 105'h Ave SE Renton, WA 98055 Tom Touma, Touma Engineers 6632 191" Place, #E-102 Kent, WA 98032 Fereshtch Dehkordi, Project Manager I1, DDES Land Use Services Division Curt Foster, Sr. Engineer, DDES Land Use Services Division Rich Hudson, Program Manager III, DDES Land Use Services Division ATTACHMENT A RIGHT TO APPEAL This action may be appealed in writing to the King County Hearing Examiner, with a fee of $250.00 (check payable to King County Office of Finance). As required by KCC 20.20.090 and 20.24.090, the appeal period shall be fourteen (14) calendar days and shall commence on the third day after the notice of decision is mailed. Filing an appeal requires actual delivery to the King County Land Use Services Division prior to the close of business (4:30 p.m.) on the date due. Prior mailing is not sufficient if actual receipt by the Division does not occur within the applicable time period. The Examiner does not have authority to extend the time period unless the Division is not open on the specified closing date, in which event delivery prior to the close of business on the next business day is sufficient to meet the filing requirement. If a timely Notice of Appeal has been filed, the appellant shall file a statement of appeal within a 21-day calendar period commencing three days after the notice of decision is mailed. The statement of appeal shall identify the decision being appealed (including file number) and the alleged errors in that decision. The statement of appeal shall state: 1) specific reasons why the decision should be reversed or modified; and 2) the harm suffered or anticipated by the appellant, and the relief sought. The scope of an appeal shall be based on matters or issues raised in the statement of appeal. Failure to timely file a notice of appeal, appeal fee, or statement of appeal deprives the Examiner of jurisdiction to consider the appeal. Appeals must be submitted to the Department of Development and Environmental Services, addressed as follows: LAND USE APPEAL Land Use Services Division Department of Development and Environmental Services BlackRiver Corporate Park 900 Oakesdale Avenue Southwest Renton, WA 98055-1219 A request for a pre -hearing conference may be made by any party. For more information regarding appeal proceedings and pre -hearing conferences, please contact the Office of the Examiner for a Citizens' Guide to the Examiner hearings and/or read KCC 20.20 and 20.24. OFFICE OF THE HEARING EXAMINER KING COUNTY, WASMNGTON 400 Yesler Way, Room 404 Seattle, Washington 98104 Telephone (206) 2964660 Facsimile (206) 296-1654 REPORT AND DECISION September 17, 2004 SUBJECT: Department of Development and Environmental Services File No tiO3S0031`1 �NGY_SHORT PLAT-_ Short Plat Appeal Location: 17003 — 105th Avenue Southeast Appellants: Tim McCannon & Bonnie Bottesch 17007 — 105th Place Southeast Renton, Washington 98055 Telephone: (425) 277-9569 Applicant: Teng Ngy represented by Mark Olson Cornerstone Engineering 1000 Denny Way, #800 Seattle, WA 98109 Telephone: (206) 250-7306 Facsimile: (206) 494-9460 King County: Department of Development and Environmental Services represented by Fereshteh Dehkordi and Curt Foster 900 OakesdaIe Avenue Southwest Renton, Washington 98055 Telephone: (206) 296-7173 and 296-7106 Facsimile: (206) 296-7051 SUMMARY OF DECISION/RECOMMENDATION: Department's Preliminary Recommendation: Department's Final Recommendation: Examiner's Decision: Deny appeal Deny appeal Appeal denied MAIN FILE COPY N F1 I.03S0031 — Ngy Short Plat EXAMINER PROCEEDINGS: Hearing Opened: Hearing Closed: Page2Of5 September 15, 2004 September 15, 2004 Participants at the public hearing and the exhibits offered and entered are listed in the attached minutes. A verbatim recording of the hearing is available in the office of the King County Hearing Examiner. FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS & DECISION: Having reviewed the record in this matter, the Examiner now makes and enters the following: FINDINGS: 1. On June 18, 2004, the King County Department of Development and Environmental Services issued a preliminary approval to Teng Ngy to short plat .41 acres in the R-8 zone into three lots for a single-family residential development. The property located at 17003 — 105th Avenue Southeast currently contains an existing residence that is being remodeled under a separate building permit. The three lots are proposed to be accessed from 105th Avenue Southeast via a common private driveway. The preliminary approval requires the Applicant to obtain a drainage adjustment to pump runoff uphill from the lots to a ditch that runs along 105th Avenue Southeast, 2. A timely appeal of the short plat approval was filed by Tim McCannon and Bonnie Bottesch, representing themselves and other neighborhood residents. A pre -hearing conference on the appeal was held by the King County Hearing Examiner's Office on August 19, 2004, and a pre - hearing order was issued on August 20, 2004. The appeal issues identified within the pre - hearing order concern the potential for failure within the Applicant's proposed drainage pump system, the allegation that the proposed short plat violates density and lot area requirements, and questions concerning the consistency of a street tree requirement with the installation of utility facilities and the adequacy of off-street parking for the lots- Certain other issues raised by the Appellants appeared to be more related to perceptions regarding the sloppiness of the work being done by the Applicant pursuant to his building permit for remodeling the existing residence, and DDES staff was requested to facilitate site inspections with respect to such issues. A summary of these inspection activities appears in the record as exhibit 9. The DDES supplemental staff report (exhibit 4), as elaborated at the public hearing by the staff testimony, is responsive to the appeal issues. As indicated by staff, the drainage adjustment required of the Applicant for diversion of site runoff uphill to 105th Avenue Southeast will implement Surface Water Design manual requirements for dual alternating pumps, an alarm system for pump failure, and possibly a requirement for extra sump capacity sufficient to retain drainage flows when there is a temporary electrical power outage. These measures all need to be adequately described and documented by the Applicant prior to final engineering approval. In like manner, street trees to be planted on the site must be derived from an approved list of landscaping vegetation that has been selected for compatibility with utility development, and the Applicant will need to provide two off-street parking spaces on each lot consistent with code requirements. L03SO031 — Ngy Short Plat Page 3 of 4. The record also demonstrates that the short plat application meets existing zoning code requirements for density within the R-8 zone. Based on a parcel size of approximately 18,000 square feet and no deduction for submerged lands, the property supports development at approximately 3.3 units, thus warranting a three -lot plat with some square footage to spare. 5. The only contention raised by the Appellants that the staff report does not discuss in detail is the suggestion that proposed lot no. 3 at 3,410 square feet may be undersized. Because the zoning code now regulates development on the basis of overall density rather than minimum lot size, only minimal dimensional requirements must be met. KCC 21A.12.030 requires that any new lot created have a minimum width of at least 30 feet, and KCC 21 A.12,100 mandates in urban residential zones a minimum lot area of 2500 square feet. All lots within the proposed short plat meet these minimum dimensional requirements. 6. Finally, while staff has no authority to impose upon an applicant development requirements in excess of those contained in County regulations, one nonetheless observes that the Ngy Short Plat is not as radical a departure from existing neighborhood patterns as argued by the Appellants. On the block bounded by 105th Avenue Southeast on the east and 104th Avenue Southeast on the west, and lying between Southeast 166th Street and SR 515, there appear currently to be 11 parcels (including the subject application) containing between 16,000 and 18,000 square feet. There are, however, another I8 lots that are half this size due to prior short platting activity. Thus the net effect of the current short plat application under R-8 zoning will be to create 3 lots on 18,000 square feet, instead of 2 lots within the same area as was permitted by prior zoning. CONCLUSIONS: The Appellants have not met their burden of proof to demonstrate that the preliminary approval conferred by DDES on June 18, 2004, for the Ngy Short Plat violated county platting or zoning requirements. The appeal therefore must be denied. DECISION: The appeal is DENIED. ORDERED this 17th day of September, 2( King County Hearing Examiner L03SO031 — Ngy Short Plat Page 4 of 5 TRANSMITTED this 17th day of September, 2004, to the parties and interested persons of record: Christopher & Michele Binkley 17032 - 104th Ave. SE Renton WA 98055 Heath & Miyumi Conner 17010 - 104th Ave. SE Renton WA 98055 Jeff & Lynn Howard 17014 - 104th Ave. Se Renton WA 98055 Rebecca Lind City of Renton, EDNSP 1055 S. Grady Way Renton WA 98056 Reggie Newman 17013 - 105th Ave. SE Renton WA 98055 Jay Seo Cornerstone Engineering 1000 Denny Way, #800 Seattle WA 98109 David & Wendy Yadock 17020 - 104th Ave. SE Renton WA 98055 Lisa Dinsmore DDES/LUSD MS OAK-DE-0100 Carol Rogers DDES/LUSD MS OAK-DE-0100 Hank & Eulaine Blumenthal 16830 - 105th Ave. SE Renton WA 98055 Cornerstone Engineering Mark Olson 1000 Denny Way, #800 Seattle WA 98109 Anthony & Patricia Juarez 16663 - 105th Ave. SE Renton WA 98055 Javier & Lymara Casio 17031 - 105th Ave. SE Renton WA 98055 Barry Crampton 16820 - 105th Ave. SE Renton WA 98055 Margaret King 16829 - 105th Ave. SE Renton WA 98055 Bonnie Bottesch & Tim McCannon Robert & Marjorie Midgett 17007 - 105th Ave. SE 17012 - 105th Ave. SE Renton WA 98055 Renton WA 98055 Teng Nyg 5563 - 156th Ave. SE Bellevue WA 98006 Darren & Bonnie Sweaney 17004 - 105th Ave. SE Renton WA 98055 Mark Bergam DDES/LUSD Engineering Review MS OAK-DE-0100 Curt foster DDES/LUSD Engineering Review Section MS OAK-DE-0100 Eugene Riske 16821 - 105th Ave. SE Renton WA 98055 Tom Touma Touma Engineers 6632 S 191st Pl, #E-102 Kent WA 98032 Fereshteh Dehkordi DDES/LUSD Current Planning MS OAK-DE-0100 Rich Hudson DDES/LUSD Current Planning MS OAK-DE-0100 r L03SO031 — Ngy Short Plat NOTICE OF RIGHT TO APPEAL Page 5 of 5 The action of the hearing examiner on this matter shall be final and conclusive unless a proceeding for review pursuant to the Land Use Petition Act is commenced by filing a land use petition in the Superior Court for King County and serving all necessary parties within twenty-one (21) days of the issuance of this decision. The Land Use Petition Act defines the date on which a land use decision is issued by the Hearing Examiner as three days after a written decision is mailed. MINUTES OF THE SEPEMBER 15, 2004, PUBLIC HEARING ON DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT AND ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES FILE NO. L03SO031. Stafford L. Smith was the Hearing Examiner in this matter. Participating in the hearing were Fereshteh Dehkordi, Mark Bergam and Curt Foster, representing the Department; Tim McCannon, Bonnie Bottesch, the Appellants; Mark Olson, representing the Applicant and Jeff Howard. The following Exhibits were offered and entered into the record: Exhibit No, I DDES File Nos. L03S0031 & L04APOI0 Exhibit No. 2 Preliminary approval letter, dated June 18, 2004 Exhibit No. 3 Application received November 14, 2003 Exhibit No. 4 DDES staff report for September 15, 2004, appeal hearing Exhibit No. 5 Site Plan received November 14, 2003 Exhibit No. 6 Field Report dated January 8, 2003 Exhibit No. 7 Level One Drainage Report dated November 13, 2003 Exhibit No. 8 Appeal Statement received July 12, 2004 Exhibit No. 9 Memo from Fereshteh Dehkordi to Stafford Smith dated September 2, 2004 SLS:ms L03SO031 RPT DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT AND ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES LAND USE SERVICES DIVISION REPORT TO THE HEARING EXAMINER PUBLIC HEARING NOTICE — September 15, 2004 at 1:00 P.M. DDES Hearing Room 900 Oakesdale Avenue SW Renton, WA (Hearings are sometimes postponed or canceled. Call 296-6640 to confirm hearing date, time, and place. Parties and interested persons who have requested notification about this proposal will be notified of the time and date of the rescheduled hearing. Any questions about postponements and rescheduling can be directed to the Hearing Examiner's Office at (206) 296-4660. Appeal of a Short Plat Preliminary decision FILE No. L03SO031 A. GENERAL INFORMATION: Project Short subdivision of approximately .41 acre parcel into three residential lots in R-8 zone. Applicant: Teng Ngy 5563 1561h Avenue SE Bellevue, WA 980006 (206) 351-1994 Appellants: Tim McCannon and Bonnie Bottesch 17007 1051h Place Southeast Renton, WA 98055 (425)277-9569 Location: 17003 105`h Avenue Southeast STR: SW '/4 29-23-05 Zoning: Residential 8 dwelling unit per an acre R-8 B. History and Background: On November 14, 2003, the applicant Mr. Ngy applied for a short subdivision permit to subdivide a .42 acre parcel into three residential lots within a residential zone with a density of eight dwelling unit per acre. Mr. Ngy had already applied for a building permit on February 7, 2003 to remodel and expand the existinghouse on the site. The buildin rmit was issued on April 4, 2003. j Exhibit No. g�....-- p Item No. IN FILE COPY Received C King Court.HearN� F.xamiller APPEAL OF SHORT PLht DECISION FILE: L04AP0010 NGY Short Plat, KC File No. L03SO031 On June 18, 2004 DDES issued a preliminary approval subject to conditions for the proposed three -lot short subdivision. This decision was timely appealed by the neighbors on July 6, 2004. An statement of appeal was submitted by the appellants on July 12, 2004. C. SERA APPEAL: On July 6, 2004, a timely appeal was filed with the Department of Development and Environmental Services (DDES) by number of neighbors represented by Mr. McCannon and Ms. Bonnie Bottesch. The appeal raised number of issues. A pre -hearing conference was held by the King County Hearing Examiner's Office on August 19, 2004. A Pre -Hearing Order issued by the Hearing Examiner on August 20, 2004 identified these issues relevant to the short plat proposal: 1. Would failure of the Applicant's proposed drainage pump system harm surrounding residential properties? Should a backup system be required to mitigate for potential pump failure? 2. Does proposed lot 3 within the short plat at an area of 3410 square feet violate zoning density or lot area requirements? Can three lots be platted on the property consistent with applicable density and lot area standards? Will the plat requirement to plant street trees create a risk to drainage or sewage facilities from tree root growth? 4. Will the short plat, as designed, adequately provide for required off-street parking? D. SCOPE AND STANDARD OF REVIEW The proposed short subdivision is governed by the, 1994 King County Comprehensive Plan which designates this area as Urban. The proposal is reviewed under the provision of King County Short Subdivision Code, Title 19A. 08.; King County Zoning Code, Title 21A; Surface Water Design Manual under the King County Title 9; and Road Standards under the King County Title 14. Standards and requirements applied by these codes assure proper subdivision of land in accordance with state and county laws and protects public health safety and welfare. E. APPEAL ISSUES DISCUSSION Would failure of the Applicant's proposed drainage pump system harm surrounding residential properties? Should a backup system be required to mitigate for potential pump failure? 2 APPEAL OF SHORT PLA i DECISION FILE: L04AP0010 NGY Short Plat, KC File No. L03SO031 When downstream property owners do not agree to provide a drainage easement to convey drainage flow across their property, a drainage adjustment to divert developed flows from the natural discharge location will be required per the KCSWDM Core Requirement #1. Drainage adjustments are reviewed on a case by case basis and are granted based on their merits. Through the review process for the drainage adjustment, the potential need to mitigate for downstream conveyance issues can be addressed through higher levels of flow control. KCSWDM, Section 4.2.3.1 requires dual pumps with external alarm in case of pump failure. Additionally, sump capacity can be enlarged to retain flows to their pre -developed levels. The Adjustment conditions of approval take into account the potential harm to surrounding (downstream) property owners. The applicant is required to apply for a drainage adjustment from The KCSWDM Core Requirement #1. The adjustment request must be reviewed and granted approval by the DDES Drainage Adjustment Committee subject to appropriate conditions prior to the engineering plan approval. 2. Does proposed lot 3 within the short plat at an area of 3410 square feet violate zoning density or lot area requirements? Can three lots be platted on the property consistent with applicable density and lot area standards? Per KCC 21A.12.070, the allowable number of lots are computed by multiplying the site area specified in KCC 2IA. 12.080 by the applicable residential base density number. KCC 21A.12.080- Te site area for base density and maximum density floor calculations allows that all site areas to be used in calculation of base allowed residential density with the exception of areas within the site characterized as submerged lands. Per KCC 21A.12.080 B., submerged lands cannot be credited toward base density. The site does not include any submerged land. KCC 21 A.06.1273 defines submerged land as any land at or below the Ordinary High Water Mark (OHWM). The subject site is zoned R-8 and is approximately .41 acre. Multiplying the site area, .41 acre by the zone density 8, the allowed density of site is 3.36 or a total of three lots. The driveway tract does not get subtracted from the lot area. The proposed three -lot subdivision meets the density and lot dimension requirements of R-8 zone. 3. Will the plat requirement to plant street trees create a risk to drainage or sewage facilities from tree root growth? KCC 21A.16.050 E requires street trees along the streets fronting all residential subdivisions. The street trees must be installed in accordance with the King 3 APPEAL OF SHORT PLA it DECISION FILE: L04APOOIO NGY Short Plat, KC File No. L03S0031 County Road Standards Drawing No. 5-009. The street trees must be selected from the approved street tree list by the King County Council. The trees are carefully selected with least and no damage to public infrastructure and utilities. 4. Will the short plat, as designed, adequately provide for required off-street parking? KCC 2IA. 18.030 requires two off-street parking spaces be provided on site per single family residence. Each lot must provide a minimum two off-street parking spaces on site. This will be reviewed during the building permit process for each lot. Per the required density lot area dimensions, each lot will be large enough to accommodate two off-street parking spaces. The frontage street is a minor access road and it is expected that occasional guest parking may occur along the street. Two additional lots will not create parking congestion in the area. F. CONCLUSIONS: This proposal is not in conflict with the policies of the Comprehensive Plan. Further the subject short subdivision will comply with the goals and objectives of the King County Comprehensive Plan and will comply with the requirements of the Subdivision and Zoning Codes and other official land use controls of King County, based on the conditions of the short plat preliminary approval. G. RECOMMENDATION: Deny the appeal and approve the short subdivision subject to conditions. 0 Transmitted to the following Parties of Record for short plat L03S0031: Binkley, Christopher & Michele 17032 104`h Ave SE, Renton, WA 98055 Blumenthal, Hank & Eulaine 16830 105`h Ave SE, Renton, WA 98055 Bottesch, Bonnie & McCannon Timothy 17007 105`h Ave SE, Renton, WA 98055 Casio, Javier & Ly Mara 17031 105`h Ave SE, Renton, WA 98055 Courier, Heath & Miyumi 17010 104th Ave SE, Renton, WA 98055 Crampton, Barry 16820 105th Ave SE, Renton, WA 98055 Donaldson, James 17003 105`h Ave SE, Renton, WA 98055 Howard, Jeff & Lynn 17014 104th Ave SE, Renton, WA 98055 Juarez, Anthonly & Patricia 16663 1051h Ave SE, Renton, WA 98055 King, Margaret 16829 105`h Ave SE, Renton, WA 98055 Lind, Rebecca, City of Renton, EDNSP 1055 s. Grady Way, Renton, WA 98055 Midgett, Robert & Marjorie 17012 105`h Ave SE, Renton, WA 98055 Newman, Reggie 17013 105th Ave SE, Renton, WA 98055 Nyg, Teng 5563 156th Ave SE, Bellevue, WA 98006 Olson, Mark, Cornerstone Engineering 100 Denny Way, Suite 800, Seattle, WA 98109 Riske, Eugene 16821 105th Ave SE, Renton, WA 98055 Sweaney, Darren & Bonnie 17004 1051h Ave SE, Renton, WA 98055 Touma, Tom, Touma Engineers 6632 S. 191" Place #E-102, Kent, WA 98032 Yadock, David & Wendy 17020 104`h Ave SE, Renton, WA 98055 Fereshteh Dehkordi, Project Manager 11, DDES Land Use Services Division Curt Foster, Sr. Engineer, DDES Land Use Services Division Rich Hudson, Program Manager III, DDES Land Use Services Division Lisa Dinsmore, Current Planning Supervisor, DDES Land Use Services Division Carol Rogers, Office Technician II, DDES Land Use Services Division Ding County Department of Development and Environmental Services 900 Oakesdale Avenue SW Renton, WA 98055-1219 September 2, 2004 TO: Stafford Smith King County Hearing Examiner 400 Yesler Way, Room 404 Seattle, WA 98104 From: Fereshteh Dehkordi, Project Manager Current Planning Section RE: Np-v Short Plat Appeal, L04APO10 Short Plat File No. L03SO031 This is to inform you that I requested the Building Services Division of King County Department of Development and Environmental Services (DDES) to perform a building inspection to identify any code violations on the site. Mr. Bill Scharer inspected the site on August 31, 2004. Mr. Scharer can be reached at (206) 296-6775, I also inspected the site on August 24, 2004. The following were observed. The appellant is advised to contact the staff mentioned below regarding any specific complaint: o There is currently a building permit for remodeling/expanding the existing house on the site (KC File B03M0225). The building permit has been issued but a certificate of occupancy has not been issued. In an attempt to divert street runoff from his property, a low curb has been placed by the applicant along a portion of site's frontage. The curb appears to be within the right-of-way and must be removed. Cleo Rubalcaba'is the building permit inspector for the building permit on this site. The applicant has agreed to remove the curb and provide permanent erosion control per KCSWDM-priorto issuance of a certificate of occupancy. The appellant are advised to contact Mr. RubaIcaba at (206) 296-7052 regarding this matter. The staff observed that runoff from the road enters the site and may have contributed to the drainage problem on the site and on neighboring properties to the�south and west. While the construction of the curb and sidewalk required by the short plat will help this situation, the appellants are encouraged to contact the Department of Natural Resources, Surface Water Management, Drainage Complaints at (206) 296 1900 or Exhibit No.La� Item No. MAIN FILE COPY Received n King County Hearing aminer n Gerry Arnston at (206) 8149 for further investigation regarding the drainage problem in the area . The construction site appeared to be cleaned during the recent field visit. A small amount of construction debris was observed. It should be noted that it is common for construction debris to accumulate during the construction period, however the applicant is required to keep the construction site in a safe and managed condition. As part of the certificate of occupancy, the applicant will be required to remove the construction related debris from the site. The appellants are advised to contact Mr. Rubalcaba at (206) 296-7052 regarding this matter. The house is currently served by public sewer managed by Soos Creek Sewer and Water District. Jarone Baker of the King County Health Department indicated that to abandon an old septic system, the Health Department normally requests that the property owner pump out the septic tank and back fill the tank area with crushed rocks and back fills. Once this is done the property owner fills out an abandonment form and submits it to the Health Department The Health Department record does not show any record of a septic tank "as built" on the site. The appellants are advised to contact Jarone Baker, Environmental Health Specialist at (206) 296-9738 regarding any improperly abandoned septic system. o No grading violation was observed on the site. A grading permit will be required if 500 cubic yards of fill is excavated or is placed on the site. Since less than 500 cubic yards was excavated, no grading permit was required as part of the building permit. O Carol Coombs, the King County Health Department Investigator investigated the site for the presence of rodents on the site. She has not found evidence of rodents on the site. She can be reached at (206) 296-4736 for any further questions regarding this matter. If you have any questions please feel free to contact me at (206) 296-7173. Cc: Tim McCannon & Bonnie Bottesch, Appellants Bill Scharer, Assistant Supervisor, Building Inspection Attn: Cleo Rubalcaba, Building Inspector Rich Hudson, Senior Project Manager, Current Planning Section L03SO031 Carol Rogers DDESILUSD MS OAK-DE-0100 OFFICE OF THE HEARING EXAMINER KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON 400 Yesicr Way, Room 404 Seattle, Washington 98104 Telephone (206) 2964660 Facsimile (206) 296-1654 August 26, 2004 NOTICE OF RESCHEDULED HEARING SUBJECT: Department of Development and Environmental Services File No. L03SO031 NGY SHORT PLAT Short Plat Appeal Location: 17003 — 105th Avenue Southeast Appellants: Tim McCannon & Bonnie Bottesch 17007 — 105th Place Southeast Renton, Washington 98055 Telephone: (425) 277-9569 Applicant: Teng Ngy 5563 — 156th Avenue Southeast Bellevue, Washington 98006 (206) 351-1994 King County: Department of Development and Environmental Services represented by Fereshteh Dehkordi and Curt Foster 900 Oakesdale Avenue Southwest Renton, Washington 98055 Telephone: (206) 296-7173 and 296-7106 Facsimile: (206) 296-7051 At the request of DDES staff, and agreement by all parties, the public hearing on the above -referenced appeal originally scheduled for 1:00 p.m. on September 10, 2004, has been rescheduled for the following time and place: 1:00 P.M. Wednesday — September 15, 2004 Department of Development and Environmental Services Hearing Room 900 Oakesdale Avenue SW Renton, Washington mN N Fll_F Copy L03SO031 — Ngy Short Plat Page 2 of 3 ORDERED this 26th day of Augusl --b v..v —.7 f14Ui���b LA"JILJIIlI TRANSMITTED this 26th day of August, 2004, to the following parties and interested persons: Christopher & MicheIe Binkley Hank & Eulaine Blumenthal Javier & Lymara Casio 17032 - 104th Ave. SE 16830 - 105th Ave. SE 17031 - 105th Ave. SE Renton WA 98055 Renton WA 98055 Renton WA 98055 Heath & Miyumi Conner Cornerstone Engineering Barry Crampton 17010 - 104th Ave. SE Mark OIson 16820 - 105th Ave. SE Renton WA 98055 1000 Denny Way, #800 Renton WA 98055 Seattle WA 98109 James Donaldson Jeff & Lynn Howard Anthony & Patricia Juarez 17003 - 105th Ave. SE 17014 - 104th Ave. Se 16663 - 105th Ave. SE Renton WA 980 Renton WA 98055 Renton WA 98055 Margaret King Rebecca Lind Bonnie Boesch & Tim McCannon 16829 - 105th Ave. SE City of Renton, EDNSP 17007 - 105th Ave. SE Renton WA 98055 1055 S. Grady Way Renton WA 98055 Renton WA 98056 Robert & Marlorie Midgett Reggie Newman Teng Nyg 17012 - 105th Ave. SE 17013 - 105th Ave. SE 5563 - 156th Ave. SE Renton WA 98055 Renton WA 98055 Bellevue WA 98006 Eugene Riske Jay Seo Darren & Bonnie Sweaney 16821 - I05th Ave. SE Cornerstone Engineering 17004 - 105th Ave. SE Renton WA 98055 1000 Denny Way, #800 Renton WA 98055 Seattle WA 98109 Tom Touma David & Wendy Yadock Fereshteh Dehkordi Touma Engineers 17020 - 104th Ave. SE DDES/LUSD 6632 S 191 st PI, #E-102 Renton WA 98055 Current Planning Kent WA 98032 MS OAK-DE-0100 Lisa Dinsmore Curt Foster Rich Hudson DDES/L.USD DDES/LUSD DDES/LUSD MS OAK-DE-0100 Engineering Review Section Current Planning MS OAK-DE-0100 MS OAK-DE-0100 i L03SO031 — Ngy Short Plat Page 3 of 3 Carol Rogers DDES/LUSD MS OAK-DE-0I00 NOTE: If the Renton School District announces a district -wide school closure due to adverse weather conditions or similar area emergency, the public hearing on this matter will be postponed. Parties of record will be notified of the time and date of the rescheduled hearing. Any questions regarding postponements and rescheduling can be directed to the Hearing Examiner's Office at (206) 2964660. Sign language and communication material in alternate formats can be arranged �� given sufficient notice at 296-1000 (TDD number 296-1024). Y7=C0 eoee aooao SLS:ms L03SO031 NOT DIRECTIC; TO DDES HEARING R0014"� 900 OAKESDALE AVE SW, RENTON SORTHBOUND I-5 • EXIT 157 — Marting Luther King Way • Turn RIGHT onto 6e Ave. S. 6e Ave. S becomes MONSTFR RD. SW Monster Rd. turns into OAKESDALE A VE SW DDES is on your left (building 900) NORTHBOUND 1-5 • EXIT 154 to I-405/WA-5IS/Burien/Renton • Stay right to I405/Renton/Bellevue I-405 EXIT I to WA- 181/W. Valley Hwy. • LEFT onto W. Valley Hwy/SR 181 • RIGHT onto East Grady Way LEFT onto Oakesdale Ave. SW DDES is on your right (building 900) NORTHBOUND SR 167 Northbound under the I-405 overpass • LEFT at SW 7' St. (2°" light) • LEFT onto Oakesdale Ave. SW DDES is on your left (building 900) SOUTIMOUND I-405 • EXIT 2 to WA-167/Auburn/Rainier Ave. • Follow to SR-167 (Valley Fwy.) north • LEFT onto SW Grady Way • RIGHT onto Oakesdale Ave. SW DDES is on your right (building 900) NORTIBOUND I-405 • EXIT I to Interurban Ave. S/West Valley Hwy • LEFT at light at ramp bottom (north under IA05) • RIGHT onto SW Grady Way • LEFT onto Oakesdale Ave. SW DDES is on your right (building 900) SW 7TM STREET H 0 sW GRADY WAY S 4 G:\workingWiscV {exV)D1>S directions.doc j� L03SO031 Carol Rogers DDESILUSD MS OAK-DE-0100 OFFICE OF THE HEARING EXAMINER KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON 400 Yesler Way, Room 404 Seattle, Washington 98104 Telephone (206) 296-4660 Facsimile (206) 296-1654 August 20, 2004 PRE -HEARING ORDER AND NOTICE OF HEARING SUBJECT: Department of Development and Environmental Services File No. L03SO031 NGY SHORT PLAT Short Plat Appeal Location: 17003 -- 105th Avenue Southeast Appellants: Tim McCannon & Bonnie Bottesch 17007 — 105th Place Southeast Renton, Washington 98055 Telephone: (425) 277-9569 Applicant: Teng Ngy 5563 —156th Avenue Southeast Bellevue, Washington 98006 (206) 351-1994 King County: Department of Development and Environmental Services represented by Fereshteh Dehkordi and Curt Foster 900 Oakesdale Avenue Southwest Renton, Washington 98055 Telephone: (206) 296-7173 and 296-7106 Facsimile: (206) 296-7051 A pre -hearing conference on the above -referenced appeal was held by the King County Hearing Examiner's Office on August 19, 2004. Representing the parties were Tim McCannon and Bonnie Bottesch for the Appellants, Teng Ngy and Jay Seo for the Applicant, and Feresbteh Dehkordi and Curt Foster for King County Department of Development and Environmental Services. 2. ' The issues on appeal are as follows: A. Would failure of the Applicant's proposed drainage pump system harm surrounding residential properties? Should a backup system be required to mitigate for potential pump failure? B. Does proposed lot 3 within the short plat at an area of 3410 square feet violate zoning density or lot area requirements? Can three lots be platted on the property consistent with applicable density and lot area standards? MAIN PILE COPY L03SO031 — Ngy Short Plat Page 2 of 3 N C. Will the plat requirement to plant street trees create a risk to drainage or sewage facilities from tree root growth? D. Will the short plat, as designed, adequately provide for required off-street parking? The appeal statement also alleges the failure of an existing septic system, site clearing and grading without a grading permit and without adequate erosion and sedimentation control, and garbage and rodents on the property. These appear to be potential code and building permit enforcement issues rather than short plat questions, and Ms. Dchkordi has offered to assist the Appellants in bringing these matters to the attention of the appropriate inspection and enforcement officials. Ms. Dehkordi is requested to provide to the Examiner within two weeks of the date of this order a brief written report describing this referral process. The following deadline has been established for the pre -hearing procedures described below: August 27, 2004. Deadline for disclosing to the other parties and to the Hearing Examiner, the name, address, telephone number and expert qualifications, if any, of each witness who is expected to testify at the hearing. If any party proposes to offer at the hearing studies or reports containing new analysis, factual information, or graphic representations of a site - specific nature, such materials shall also be provided to the other parties and to the Examiner by this disclosure date. The parties are presumed to be aware of materials in the DDES files for this proceeding that were available for public inspection on the date of this order. The above deadline also applies to filing of any supplemental DDES staff report. 4. The public hearing on the appeal is scheduled to open at the following time and place: 1:00 P.M. Friday — September 10, 2004 Department of Development and Environmental Services Hearing Room 900 Oakesdale Avenue SW Renton, Washington The order of presentation at the public hearing shall be as follows: A. Introduction of DDES file exhibits B. Appellant testimony in support of the appeal. C. Applicant testimony in opposition to the appeal D. DDES staff testimony E. Rebuttal testimony in the same sequence as initial presentation F. Closing arguments 6. The representatives of the parties for the purposes of service and exchange of documents and information are those identified in bold face at the beginning of this pre -hearing order. 7. While oversized displays may be used at the public hearing for demonstrative purposes, smaller copies thereof sized to fit within an 8 '/s by 14 '/2-inch file should be submitted to the hearing record as exhibits. Also please note that pre -hearing exchange of documents among the parties does not eliminate the need to offer separate copies of such documents at the hearing as exhibits. 8. Regarding exhibits that have not been previously disclosed, the parties are directed to bring to the public hearing a copy for each primary party, as well as the original document to be submitted to the hearing record. J L03S0031—Ngy Short Plat Page 3 of 3 ORDERED this 20th day of August, 201 TRANSMITTED this 20th day of August, 2004, to the following parties and interested persons: Christopher & Michele Binkley Hank & Eulaine Blumenthal Javier & Lymara Casio 17032 - 104th Ave. SE 16830 - 105th Ave. SE 17031 - 105th Ave. SE Renton WA 98055 Renton WA 98055 Renton WA 98055 Heath & Miyurni Conner Cornerstone Engineering Barry Crampton 17010 - 104th Ave. SE Mark Olson 16920 - 105th Ave. SE Renton WA 98055 1000 Denny Way, #900 Renton WA 98055 Seattle WA 98109 James Donaldson Jeff & Lynn Howard Anthony & Patricia Juarez 17003 - 105th Ave. SE 17014 - 104th Ave. Se 16663 - 105th Ave. SE Renton WA 980 Renton WA 98055 Renton WA 98055 Margaret King Rebecca Lind Bonnie Bottesch & Tim McCannon 16829 - 105th Ave. SE City of Renton, EDNSP 17007 - 105th Ave. SE Renton WA 98055 1055 S. Grady Way Renton WA 98055 Renton WA 98056 Robert & Marjorie Midgett Reggie Newman Teng Nyg 17012 - 105th Ave. SE 17013 - 105th Ave. SE 5563 - 156th Ave. SE Renton WA 98055 Renton WA 98055 Bellevue WA 98006 Eugene Riske Jay Seo Darren & Bonnie Sweaney 16821 - 105th Ave. SE Cornerstone Engineering 17004 - 105th Ave. SE Renton WA 98055 1000 Denny Way, 4800 Renton WA 98055 Seattle WA 98109 Tom Touma David & Wendy Yadock Fereshteh Dehkordi Tourna Engineers 17020 - 104th Ave. SE DDES/LUSD 6632 S 191 st PI, #E-102 Renton WA 98055 Current Planning Kent WA 98032 MS OAK-DE-0100 Lisa Dinsmore Curt Foster Rich Hudson DDES/LUSD DDES/LUSD DDES/LUSD MS OAK-DE-0100 Engineering Review Section Current Planning MS OAK-DE-0100 MS OAK-DE-0100 L03SO031 — Ngy Short Plat C (6 Page 4 of 3 �. Carol Rogers DDES/LUSD MS OAK-DE-0100 NOTE: If the Renton School District announces a district -wide school closure due to adverse weather conditions or similar area emergency, the public hearing on this matter will be postponed. Parties of record will be notified of the time and date of the rescheduled hearing. Any questions regarding postponements and rescheduling can be directed to the Hearing Examiner's Office at (206) 296-4660. Sign language and communication material in alternate formats can be arranged t given sufficient notice at 296-1000 (TDD number 296-1024). 1000001 AA°°°° a°°o° SLS:ms L03SO031 PHO Attachment I/ ATTACHMENT A (Excerpt from Examiner's Rules, effective March 31, 1995) XLB CONDUCT OF HEARING: Presentation of Evidence ... 2. Admissibility of Evidence a. Except as otherwise provided by these rules, evidence will not be limited by the Washington Rules of Evidence (ER). Any trustworthy oral or documentary evidence may be received, including reliable hearsay. However, the examiner shall exclude testimony or evidence which is unreliable, unduly repetitive, irrelevant, immaterial or privileged, and may use ER as a guide when making evidentiary rulings. b. Opinions of lay witnesses on matters normally within the purview of qualified experts ordinarily will not be excluded, but lack of qualification shall be considered when giving weight to such opinions. c. The examiner may admit excerpts from public documents or from books, studies or reports when the remainder of such material is either irrelevant or unnecessary for an adequate understanding of the issue. d. Copies of documents may be accepted as evidence, provided, that the examiner may exclude copies when there is reasonable doubt as to authenticity. e. In proceedings where a penalty, forfeiture or similar divestiture of legally cognizable rights is sought by King County, the examiner may apply the Washington Rules of Evidence to govern the admissibility of evidence, and may require adherence to other rules applied in the Superior Court for King County to assure that due process of law is afforded to the parties. 3. Exhibits a. Copies of documents submitted as exhibits must be legible. b. A rare or one -of -a -kind exhibit which is held by a King County agency, and which cannot be conveniently reproduced, may be entered in the hearing record by reference. Examples of such exhibits include, but are not limited to, official zoning, land use or community plan maps or aerial photographs. If practical, duplicate reduced copies should be provided as an exhibit when possible to do so without excessive cost. c. Physical evidence may be excluded by the examiner, even though relevant, on the basis of an unreasonable custodial burden if other relevant evidence having equivalent probative value is available. The examiner also may require the substitution of photographs or reduced size copies for exhibits which are difficult to store, and written or oral descriptions of water, rocks, dirt, or other objects, instead of the actual items. Photographs, maps, charts, illustrations or similar materials which are mounted for presentation purposes shall be removable from their mounting and capable of being stored within a legal size filing cabinet drawer, unless reasonable need for submission of an exhibit not susceptible to reduction is demonstrated to the satisfaction of the examiner. (For charts, photo montages, and similar materials, a common method to meet the requirements of this rule is to attach the item(s) presented to a plain paper backing prior to mounting on poster -board, so that the evidence can be readily removed from the poster board for storage.) d. Exhibits accepted into the record shall not normally be returned to parties, except that the responsible county agency may act as the official custodian of the case file. The examiner may order the return of an exhibit when there is no public or private need for retention by the examiner or responsible County agency. DIRECTION TO DDES HEARING ROOM 900 OAKESDALE AVE SW, RENTON SORTHBOUND I-5 EXIT 157 — Marting Luther King Way • Turn RIGITF onto 68'' Ave. S. 68'h Ave. S. becomes MONSTER RD. SW Monster Rd. turns into OAKESDALE AYE SW DDES is on your left (building 900) NORTIBOUND 1-5 • EXIT 154 to I-405/WA-5I8/13urien/Renton Stay right to I-405/Renton/Bellevue I-405 EXIT 1 to WA-l8l/W. Valley Huy. LEFT onto W- Valley Hwy/SR 181 • RIG14T onto East Grady Way • LEFT onto Oakesdale Ave. SW DDES is on your right (building 900) NORTHBOUND SR 167 • Northbound under the 1-405 overpass LEFT at SW 7"' St- (204 light) • LEFT onto Oakesdale Ave- SW DDES is on your left (building 900) SORTHBOUND I405 • EXIT 2 to WA-167/Auburn/Rainier Ave- • Follow to SR-167 (Valley Fwy) north • LEFT onto SW Grady Way • RIGHT onto Oakesdale Ave- SW DDES is on your right (building 900) NORTHBOUND I-405 • EXIT I to Interurban Ave. S/West Valley Hwy • LEFT at light at ramp bottom (north under I-405) RIGHT onto SW Grady Way • LEFT onto Oakesdale Ave. SW DDES is on your right (building 900) sw 7�nl H H SW GRADY WAY E S l G.Xworking\Miscltiex\DDES directions.doc July 27, 2004 OFFICE OF THE HEARING EXAMINER KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON 400 Yesler Way, Room 404 Seattle, Washington 98104 Telephone (206) 296-4660 Facsimile (206) 296-1654 NOTICE OF PRE -HEARING CONFERENCE SUBJECT: Department of Development and Environmental Services File No. L03SO031 NGY SHORT PLAT Short Plat Appeal Location: 17003 — 105th Avenue Southeast Appellants: Tim McCannon & Bonnie Bottesch 17007 — 105th Place Southeast Renton, Washington 98055 Telephone: (425) 277-9569 Applicant: Teng Ngy 5563 — 156th Avenue Southeast Bellevue, Washington 98006 King County: Department of Development and Environmental Services, represented by Fereshteh Dehkordi 900 Oakesdale Avenue Southwest Renton, Washington 98055 Telephone: (206) 296-7173 Facsimile: (206) 296-705I On August 19, 2004, at 1:00 p.m., in the Department of Development and Environmental Services Hearing Room, 900 Oakesdale Avenue SW, Renton, Washington, a pre -hearing conference on this appeal will be opened for the purposes of: o Identifying issues; o Considering the need for discovery; a Scheduling hearing dates and times; and o Addressing such other procedural matters as will assist in the efficient conduct of the hearing. Mediation of disputes is available pursuant to King County Code Section 20.24.330 and Rules of Mediation. If you are interested in mediation, please contact the Office of the Hearing Examiner for a copy of the Rules, or obtain the Rules by visiting our web site at ww.metrokc.gov/mkcc/hearingexaminer. MAIN FILE COPY ( D L03SO031 — Ngy Short Plat Page 2 of 2 The Hearing Examiner's Office has attempted to schedule the initial pre -hearing conference at a convenient time that is within the ordinance -mandated procedural time limits for the opening of a case. Any primary party wishing to reschedule the pre -hearing conference for a different time or location must make a request in writing to that effect and must obtain the written concurrence of all other primary parties, which shall be submitted to the Hearing Examiner's Office at the above address within 7 days of the date of this notice. Primary parties include the appellant, intervenors, and responsible County agencies. Agreement to reschedule this proceeding shall constitute waiver by the parties of procedural time limits for its occurrence. ORDERED this 27th day of July, 2004, O'Connor my Hearing Examiner pro tem TRANSMITTED this 27th day of July, 2004, to the following parties and interested persons: Christopher & Michele Binkley Hank & Eulalne Blumenthal Javier & Lymara Casio 17032 - 104th Ave. SE 16830 - 105th Ave. SE 17031 - 105th Ave. SE Renton WA 98055 Renton WA 96055 Renton WA 98055 Heath & Miyumi Conner Comerstor► Engineering Barry Crampton 17010 - 1041h Ave. SE Mark Olson 16820 - 105th Ave. SE Renton WA 98055 100 Denny Way, #800 Renton WA 98055 Seattle WA 98109 James Donaldson Jeff & Lynn Howard Anthony & Patricia Juarez 17003 - 105th Ave. SE 17014 - 104th Ave. Se 16663 - 105th Ave. SE Renton WA 980 Renton WA 98055 Renton WA 98055 Margaret King Rebecca Lind Bonnie Bottesch & Tim McCannon 16829 - 105th Ave. SE City of Renton, EDNSP 17007 - 105th Ave. SE Renton WA 98055 1055 S. Grady Way Renton WA 98055 Renton WA 98056 Robert & Marjorie Midgett Reggie Newman Teng Nyg 17012 - 105th Ave. SE 17013 - 105th Ave. SE 5563 - 156th Ave. SE Renton WA 98055 Renton WA 98055 Bellevue WA 98006 Eugene Riske Darren & Bonnie Sweaney Tom Touma 16821 - 105th Ave. SE 17004 - 105th Ave. SE Touma Engineers Renton WA 98055 Renton WA 98055 6632 South 191st Place, #E-102 Kent WA 98032 David & Wendy Yadock Fereshteh Dehkordl Lisa Dinsmore 17020 - 104th Ave. SE DDESILUSD DDESILUSD Renton WA 98055 Current Planning MS OAK-DE-0100 MS OAK-DE-0100 Curt Foster Rich Hudson Carol Rogers DDESILUSD DDESILUSD DDESILUSD Engineering Review Section Current Planning MS OAK-DE-0100 MS OAK-DE-0100 MS OAK-DE-0100 L03SO031 — Ngy Short Plat Page 3 of 2 NOTE: If the Renton School District announces a district -wide school closure due to adverse weather conditions or similar area emergency, the public hearing on this matter will be postponed. Parties of record will be notified of the time and date of the rescheduled hearing. Any questions regarding postponements and rescheduling can be directed to the Hearing Examiner's Office at (206) 296-4660. Sign language and communication material in alternate formats can be arranged fjF277z given sufficient notice at 296-1000 (TDD number 296-1024). .JNOC:gao L03SO031 PHC Attachment U RULES OF PROCEDURE OF THE KING COUNTY HEARING EXAMINER Rule VIII. PRE -HEARING CONFERENCES A. Purpose and Initiation Pre -hearing conferences promote efficient case management by providing an informal process for early identification of issues and resolution of procedural matters in complex cases. Evidence generally will not be received at a pre -hearing conference, except when required in order for the examiner to rule on a motion. (Pre -marking and introduction of exhibits to which there is no objection may occur at the discretion of the examiner.) The examiner, on motion of any party or upon his/her own motion, may convene a pre -hearing conference to: 1. Identify, clarify, limit or simplify issues. 2. Hear and consider pre -hearing motions. 3. Schedule hearings, identify parties and witnesses, determine the order of and limits upon testimony, obtain stipulations as to facts and law, identify and admit exhibits, order discovery, and consider and act upon any other matter which may aid in the efficient disposition of the hearing. B. Requests for Conference A motion to convene a pre -hearing conference shall be made to the examiner as soon as the need for a conference is recognized by the moving party (at least 21 days prior to the scheduled hearing date), and shall state the reasons for the request, including any motions to be presented. For good cause stated in the motion, the examiner may consider a request that fails to meet the 21-day requirement. For hearings authorized under KCC 20.24.080, a motion by any party for a pre -hearing conference shall be granted if timely. However, unless consented to by all parties or otherwise ordered for good cause by the examiner, no pre -hearing conference on an appeal can be convened later than 45 days after receipt of the statement of appeal by the hearing examiner's office. C. Proceedings at Conference A parry who has received timely notice of a pre -hearing conference shall identify at the conference any pre -hearing motions not previously made which he/she intends to make. Parties or interested persons may also file timely written pre -hearing motions for consideration at the pre - hearing conference. Failure to make or disclose a motion which was available to the parry at the time of the conference may be grounds for its denial if subsequently made. D. Pre -hearing Order Following a pre -hearing conference, the examiner shall issue an order specifying all items determined at the conference. The order shall be binding upon all parties and interested persons who received timely notice of the conference. Revised March 31, 1995 i DIRECTIONS TO DDES HEARING ROOM 900 OAKESDALE AVE SW, RENTON SOUTHBOUND 1-5 • EXIT 157 — Marling Luther King Way . Turn RIG14T onto 6e Ave. S. 6e Ave_ S. becomes MONSTER RD. SW Monster Rd turns into OAKESDALE AYE SW DDES is on your left (building 900) NORTIBOUND 1-5 • EXIT 154 to I405/WA-518Burien[Renton • Stay right to I-405/Renton/Bellevue • 1-405 EXIT 1 to WA- 181/W. Valley Hwy_ LEFT onto W. Valley Hwy/SR 181 RIGHT onto East Grady Way • LEFT onto Oakesdale Ave. SW DDES is on your right (building 900) NORTIBOUND SR 167 Northbound under the IA05 overpass • LEFT at SW 7"' St_ (2"" light) • LEC'T onto Oakesdale Ave. SW DDES is on your left (building 900) SOUTHBOUND I-405 . EXIT 2 to WA-167/AuburrE/Rainier Ave. Follow to SR-167 (Valley Fwy_) north LEFT onto SW Grady Way RIGHT onto Oakesdale Ave_ SW DDES is on your right (building 900) NORTHBOUND 1-405 EXIT I to Interurban Ave. S/Wcst Valley Hwy • LEFT at light at ramp bottom (north under IA05) • RIGHT onto SW Grady Way LEI- l' onto Oakesdale Ave_ SW DDES is on your right (building 900) SW 7' STEEE r CID SW GRADY WAY F a GAworking\MiscUtexIDDES directions_doc . .S Tad _r+, e✓�P a� 1" It is our contention that the allowance of a short plat at the above address will directly impact the neighborhood in a detrimental way. In surrounding lots, there is one home per lot and the building of three large homes on small plats would not retain the character of the area. There has also been significant impact on surrounding homes with surface water runoff since the re -grading of the property has taken place. Our specific concerns are as follows: 2. Surface Water Management (KCC9)- 5. Core Requirements#5-Erosion.& Sedimentation Control a) Basis for appeal- impact on surrounding properties b) Harm suffered -runoff going through surrounding yards and draining in septic c) Relief sought -proper control of erosion and sedimentation throughout construction, ongoing inspections to ensure this, proof of proper abandonment of existing septic, Surrounding properties have been adversely impacted with runoff from the Ngy property. In past years there has been minimal rain water during the rain season but never before has there been effluence present. It had left a layer of blacz, foul smelling goo Exhibit No Item No. L g V D Received —/6770 JUL 12 2004 L04APOIO King County Hearing iner K.C. D.D,E.S_ in our backyard that our dogs track inside the home. This sewer smelling black substance has been dragged into our carpeting necessitating steam cleaning of all carpets at least monthly. There are also health issues to the dogs and humans coming into contact with this matter. Approximately one third of our backyard was underwater at some points this past rain season. We lost fruit bearing trees and had to have our topsoil -scraped and hauled away at our expense. There is a well -documented history of sewage bubbling into surrounding properties. This is why the previous owner was compelled to hook up to the city sewer. We believe Mr. Ngy should have been compelled to submit an erosion sedimentation control plan. Until this has been taken care of and actions have been taken to prevent further damage to surrounding properties, we feel his abilities to further develop this site should be terminated. He should also be required to return surrounding properties to the condition before his work began. It is our contention that the effluence is directly coming from the abandoned on site septic system used by the previous owner. We do not believe it was abandoned according to the required procedure as set forth by the Health Department. We can find no evidence of paperwork to confirm or deny this allegation. R & R No 99-01 2 (part) 3- 19-99. We never saw evidence of work done on that property regarding the digging up of the cover, filling in of the tank or crushing of the lid. The water table on the north end of the property has been changed significantly so that the neighbor on that side is losing trees and shrubs due to lack of water. Sufficient amounts of the front and north side yards were removed and replaced with a questionable retaining wall. We are also concerned that Mr Ngy attempted to coerce one of his contractors to connect to the Howard's drainage system without their consent. He also used unscrupulous tactics when he persuaded a King county engineer to try and negotiate with the Howards in hopes of allowing him to do this. We have contacted our King County councilman responsible for this area regarding this . We feel that Mr. Ngy should at the very least present engineering plans that include a technical information report (TIR), a site improvement plan, and an erosion sediment control (.ESC) .plan. In addition, a landscape management plan should be required to comply with Core Requirement #8. (see Section 12.8) "Drainage/erosion control is.required year- round during the construction phase," as stated in your residential Building Permit Process, DDES Information Bulletin #12. If drainage and erosion control is installed by the applicant (Mr. Ngy) inspection is required BEFORE foundation inspection and will be checked by DDES on each subsequent inspection. If there is a problem , a "STOP WORK" Order may be issued until the problem is resolved. 6. Core Requirement#6. Maintenance and Operation a_) Basis for Appeal- we have seen no _printed plans for the sump pump drainage and are not sure it will address the.problem. We also are concerned about the lack of a back up system in case of mechanical failure. b) Harm Suffered- there has been contaminated water running through surrounding yards. We want to make sure this does not enter the storm drain system. c_) Relief sought --We would like an independent engineer to oversee this drainage solution. We also do not see where on the property the catch basin will be placed to catch the maximum run off to remove it from the property before affecting surrounding ..pro_perties . Collectively, the neighbors are concerned about the proposed drainage solution Mr. Ngy has to put in place and what happens to the surrounding properties if the mechanics of this sump system fail. We would like to see a backup system in.place. Also, after the drainage system is in.place and working, we would like it tested during a season of persistent and sufficient volume where the ground is saturated. We also want to make sure that the run off that is going to be_pumped into the storm. drain system across 105th Ave does not contain any of the contaminates that are flowing into our yard. Not only do we want to prevent erosion and sedimentation, we also want to prevent and mitigate habitat loss; enhance ground water discharge and prevent water quality degradation. 8. Core'Requirements #8 Water Quality a) Basis for appeal- we feel the water is not just rain run off that is entering our surrounding yards, therefore the pump system will be sending contaminated waters to the storm drain system. b) Harm suffered -we do not want contaminated waters polluting the salmon streams and other biotic resources. c) Relief sought -assure the quality of the water draining through the property and make sure the septic has been abandoned.properly. We are concerned that tests for the quality of water take -place so that the run off does not become a source for water contamination and end up in salmon streams and other biotic resources, along with erosion control and the recreational impact on the envi.ronme_nt . (S1) Special Requirement #1 — Other Adopted Requirements 1)KCC 16.82.150 D (Seasonal Clearing Restriction) 2)SC-P3 (Clearing and Grading) a) Basis for appeal -we believe that clearing and grading permits should have been established prior to excavating and clearing the property. He also began this project during the rainy season. b) Harm suffered- we are experiencing erosion and sedimentation into our yards. We have had to have our topsoil scraped and removed due -to sewerage left on the topsoil. There are several people in surrounding homes that -have been experiencing acute .asthma and allergy attacks because the property has not been properly seeded/regarded to prevent dust, weeds and long unkempt grass. c) Relief sought -lawn should be maintained in the areas not directly involved in the construction process. With the possible addition, if approved, of two more lots, this mess will continue for years to come. We believe this property was cleared prior to April 30th but after October 1st, as stated in the Surface Water Design Manual. He also graded the property with the excavated fill when he dug out the foundation. We have not found evidence of permits for either grading or clearing of the property. There is a history of the side lot on the north side of retaining water for months. With the added run off from lack of vegetation, much more runs through that open space and into surrounding yards. For the first rainy season, 1041h Ave SW was closed to all traffic due to being totally overwhelmed with -water ... in other words, flooded. The only change in the surrounding area was the changes made on 17003 105th Ave SE. We also saw Mr. Ngy siphoning water out of his foundation area this past rain season. We witnessed him siphoning this water towards Jeff and Lynn Howard's property (the property west of Ngy's). There was standing water on the entire property through May. We also saw kids playing near a large pit filled with excess water. We were grateful that no one was ever hurt. Once again, Ngy did nothing to prevent this from being a hazard. In DDES Customer Bulletin #28 it states: "Whether or not a permit is required, all clearing, filling, or grading must conform to King County Code requirements and must control erosion and protect adjacent properties." "When is a Clearing and Grading Permit Necessary? 1. Accumulative filling and /or excavation exceeding 100 cubic yards; 2. Filling to a depth of three feet or more in any one location; 3. Excavating to a depth of five feet of more in any one location." We feel all three of these requirements have been overlooked at this project. He should have been required to show temporary control facilities such as silt .fence, mulching, netting, designed to control runoff during clearing and grading. 3.Health (KCC13) a) Basis for appeal -as mentioned above, there are several neighbors that have been struggling with asthma and allergy symptoms that have either developed or worsened over the past 24 months which the period in which the property has not been maintained in character with surrounding properties. There have been rats in the past few months which we believe if from the food garbage left by the workers and the general condition of the overall piece of property. b) Harm suffered- we have had to have extensive plumbing repairs done to waterlines in the home due to rodent damage. We are being harassed with rodents on our property digging under our foundation and getting under our skirting. We have toy dogs that have been endangered by the running of rodents on the property. c) Relief sought -we want the property kept in the condition characteristic of the neighborhood. We want Mr. Ngy to clean up after his workers to ensure that food garbage containers are not left on the property. port-o-potty themselves. We want Mr. Ngy to supply a for his workers to relieve We feel that certain health issues have become aggravated during the past few months since the construction began. 'At this time, there also has been an abandonment of routine care of the property resulting in long grass, numerous weeds, and added dust and other airborne aggravants. Several neighbors have had serious asthma and allergy conditions. This property was always cared for with the previous owner. We expect the same care taken by the new owner. 4.Road Standards (KCC 14) a) Basis for appeal- we do not believe a curb is needed on the inside of a piece of property. b) Harm suffered- if there is a curb and sidewalk on the west portion of the lot, it will cause damming of water and divert even more of it to the yard directly south of the Ngy property. c) Relief sought- place the curb and sidewalk on the east side of the property that abuts 105th Ave SE A. "That portion of the west half _ of 105th Avenue SE adjoining the subject property shall be improved with curb gutter and sidewalk (urban sub access standard, KCRS Section 2'.03" We feel a curb gutter and sidewalk on the west half would not be beneficial and recommend that the aforementioned curb gutter and sidewalk be improved on the EAST side of the property. 5.Building and Construction Standards (Title 16) a) See S-1 above b) See S-1 above c ) See S-1 above As previously mentioned, grading is a major issue for the surrounding properties. Citing KCC. .09.04.050 "shall not create a significant adverse impact to downhill properties". We also believe that one of the prohibited discharges is toilet sewerage. We are getting remnants of sewerage in our yards during heavy rain seasons. We feel there have not been sufficient measures to ensure that the sediments and erosion remains on Mr. Ngy's property through use of barriers and seeding. 6.Zoning Code (KCC 21A) A.Density and Dimensions (KCC21A.12) a) Basis for appeal-3410 square feet is not sufficient for an R-8 lot. It is less than 1/16th of an acre. With taking out the PAT acreage, it allows 15,060 square feet which allows 2.76 du/ac. b) Harm suffered- this will devalue surrounding properties. c) Relief sought -allowance of 2 homes on this .4lacre with the needed access road. If allowed, we want Mr. Ngy to extend our fence from the mid point to the front of the yard on the south side of his property to prevent damage to our home and property with his blatant disregard for the codes necessary to build. If allowed, the second and third homes will be built within 12 feet of our home. This would help reduce the noise, dust and dirt while construction is taking place. we believe that 3410 sq ft. does not fulfill the requirements for an R-8 short plat subdivision. "All lots shall meet the density and dimension requirements of the R- 8 zone classification or shall be shown on the face of the approved preliminary short subdivision, whichever is'larger." KCC 12A.12.states the "minimum lot area for detached dwellings is 3500 sq. ft..". Most similar communities require 5400 — 8000 sq ft per lot for R-8 zoning. According to BuySellCyprus.com, " A critical factor in lot valuation is the size and character of typical lots in -the area." We feel this over -development of our area would affect the value of our homes adversely. Using the formula set forth on your faq website... "Can my lot be subdivided? For example, property in unincorporated King County zone R-4 and one acre in size can be divided into 4 lots. 43,560 sq ft divided by 4 base density per unit equals 10,890 sq, ft per lot." Taking this one step further, therefore 43, 560 sq ft. divided by 8 for an,R-8 zone would equal 5,445. Not anywhere near the 3,410 sq.ft. Mr. Ngy is trying to subdivide to. The private access tract (PAT) for the three plats is approximately 1,800 sq ft. That property is non -developable so it should be subtracted from the 17,860 sq ft that Mr. Ngy has at this site. We now have 15,060 sq ft. multiplied by 8 as the base density and there should be an allowable amount of 2.76 houses on his lot, not 3. With a lot approved of only 0.07 acre, how is it possible to have only 75% of the lot impervious? B.Street Trees (KCC 21A.6) a) Basis of appeal-- none b) Harm suffered- if trees are planted too near to drainage pipes the roots will grow into the pipes and cause possible damage to the sump system. c) Relief sought -management and landscape plan submission Mr.. Ngy should not be able to plan trees in the area of the proposed drainage system or septic pump lines so that roots grow into the lines and make them unserviceable. Other: a) Basis of appeal- none b) Harm suffered- we are experiencing. difficulties with passing on the street in front of 17003 10 5th Ave SE and have not been receiving mail or waste collection due to the areas being blocked by Mr. Ngy or his representatives. c) Relief sought- assurance that the parking areas and garage areas will be used and that proper rocking was done for access to the construction site prior to commencing construction to allow work vehicles to park on the property and not in the street. We feel that on street parking will be an issue. We have spoken to Mr. Ngy about he and his workers parking in the street blocking our mailboxes and trash collection. They are parking with half the vehicles in the road and it has been hard for metro/access buses to get through as well as school district busses. I can only imagine when emergency vehicles need to pass. We do have older citizens in the area and a group home with severely multi -handicapped residents. By Ngy's own admission, he is planning on having the first house be a multi generational house with possibly up to six drivers. Has a two- car garage. We've seen his Bellevue residence, and noted he is parking in the street. That may work there, but on a 19 footwide road (this is the width in front of his property)'could block or impede traffic. The neighbors have spoken to Mr. Ngy about this issue and he said he plans on parking in the street and if we don't like it, we should take it up with King County. He even went so far as to say he would park in front of other's homes. To ensure that the sump system works , King County Code 09.04.100 requires liability insurance that names King County as an additional insured to protect King County from liability. Currently, this amount must not be less than $1,000,000.00 for property damage, any accident,.negligence, failure of the facility, or any other liability relating to the construction or maintenance of drainage facilities required by King County Code 09.04.050. The signatures below of residents of 104th Ave SE, 105th Ave SE and 106th Ave SE, are interested in seeing just two homes built on the property of 17003 105th AveSE. We will take whatever legal mesasures are available to us to make sure that over development in our neighborhood does not take place. We also want the property managed In a condition similar to the other properties In the general area. We want the trash cleaned up, the lawn maintained, cars parked on the property instead of in front of neighborring homes and mail boxes. Just to name a few concerns. "acre AN (1Y Cq si o f///y'r/j ('a'�M, ,7 n Address �r f 17 03! /aS A. �-tr�•' /7o/z I70 ,'z /OSrf /tuP SE o Y r v S"'` /7V-1e,y--d° SLR' J4� /'gfs st-k <3-� ��. /b8ZQ 10!�-4'¢Ur S'2 17 00 7 / O S4:S � ' ��' JUL 12 2004 1z00 Z 10 slk kb-,AaL sl� 7 o Zca t a' aft—" Ao+.- S• t t7ULJ i0�-+ AVd 3LC • Nttme Address 17om ioq -N 4ve -43 c j 7ono %0 _ fl e s /(.9cY2-1 10 11-4vj- S 4 . P�4y o� R�o�b Statement of Appeal File No. L03SO031 17003 10511 Ave SE Renton, WA Appellants: Timothy A. Mc Cannon Bonnie Bottesch 17007 1051" Ave SE Renton, WA 98055 42 5-277-9569 Christopher H. L. Binkley Michele D. Binkley 17032 104th Ave SE Renton, WA 98055 4 2 5-2 2 7-810 3 ! e ff Howard Lynn Howard 17014 10411 Ave SE Renton, WA 98055 425-430-2830 Darren Sweaney Bobbie Sweaney 17004 105" AVE SE Renton, WA 98055 425-277-9204 David Yadock Wendy Yadock 17020 104th Ave SE Renton, WA 98055 42 5-226-7518 k lj� wti,)tj ng(�RIM D p D JUL 12 ZOOq K.C. D.D.E. Heath Conner Miyumi Conner 17010 10411 Ave SE Renton, WA 98055 Margaret King 16829 1051h Ave SE Renton, WA 98055 oV 3 SI jv '}..y! tilo ''Jfiy, c �Y 11.,: r citk, f ���16,tr t v,yr t Nm 1: Nis �+ "�•"j,�F1l 5 J i 4 'p v 71Y.j?•tY 'V ''A" y/N v'�t a"�'fi;�i:4 '144" hAzi iiis, rA i F�IF .3 1 � "+5��' �N✓� �dr � q WKv'li�f��{ g1�P. 5 �es , tYV �.l! is ,t�""!'µAl![�R� w DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMblF ANV LNvdturimtmtr xesvu Em tn" and'approwd thl. day of 20 _ Manayar, Land Um Sarriau DMMon -- -' Owmaod and approved this day of 20— D-Oaannwrt Eri&gw -1.9602' Extrnhod and apprevad this — day of 20— as a io so a w' - Aa�r SCALE: 11 Ranh : 80 Zt Deputy Ap.awr PORTION OF Almnl Wnib. DDe7DD-Dr33-Dt NE 1/4 OF- SW 1/4 of SEC ?.& rAK 23 KRG S Ir xm. LEX.3w � ` Los, ! 7,810, aq.(t. I 0.17 acres I ' L__ OD I � I I I LOT +' 2 1' 6,826, aq-ft I:, , 0.15: awns .I I I 1 i I � I N8816 3' WATER MAIN EpSF1�EtJT r RECORDING Na 4513W o. 7N elTB'46' I ! i:;ny G 3 . I 3,410. aq.fL �,- 0.07 a&ea'. I ' EX HOUSE iI $ _ I 340.00' S 88'i6'46' E SE 122 D STREET �a J4 €� SURVEY NOTES. 11` I INSTRUMENT! NIKON TOTAL STATION DTMA1@.G I 30, METHOD USED: FIELD TRAVERSE WITH ACTUAL FIELD MEASUREMENTS AND ANGLES ' WAG 332-130-020 DATE OF SURVEY. APWL. 2OD3 BASIS OF BEARING: NB8ti3 Zt SE 172M STREiT i J I I PLAT OF AKERS FARM N0. 5 "" SSMH AT SE CORNER OF PROPERTY r' i ! _BENCHMARK: -�7pg ,Rill E1EV � 200.39 (BOOK CfiEEK) � OWNER/bEVELOPER i I I TE NG NOY AND MORENY NGY I I 5563 1$6th AVE SE f I BELLEVUE, WA 98006 425-653-3402 LAND SURVEYOR .,I TOUMA, ENGNEERs 8 4AND SURVEYORS . 6632 S 1919t PLACE' SUITE' E-102' . fff KENT, WASHINGTON 98032 425•-251-DB65 + ZONING INFORMATION .. l `•• "�$ TTpOTAL ACREAGE 0.41 ACRES a,l .. ZONE r Paso J to 1 ROAD AREA 0 vk t, I SMALLEST LOT 34io S•F ' PROPOSED USE SINGLE FAMILY HOME f SOIL TYPE ALDERDWOOD A90 s I DRAINAGE WELL DRAINED - VECEYA730N GRASS LEGEND I Q ®G� (TYPE 1) d TELEPHONE CAE.JIN,� (S) SANITARY SEWER MH SON CONIFER TREE f � ® M WATER 'VALVE I . 202T9 WATER METER/SERVICE Q DECIDUOUS TRH 'r I -& FIRE HYDRANT b' MAIL BOX ! _ I b UTILITY POLE + PK NAIL y ® F Guy WIRE 6 MON IN CASE/ ` 3A' I ' l ' ..., o EX REBAR / PIPE 430 'I . I ... _ - .. AS NOTED i LEGAL. DESCRIPTI04 ' FAST 1/2 OF LOT 10 IN BLOCK 2 OF AKER'S FARM NO. 5, AS PER fLAT REDORDED IN VOLUME 40 OF PLATS, PAGE 27, RECORDS OF KING CDusm: �.,�Nov t 4 2M SITUATE IN THE COUNTY OF KINO STATE OF WASHINGION. 1' D S ''E _ -- - — - K,C. D.D.E.S, �L N 88'O3le E (BASIS OF'BEAM(;)' 711 LAND SURVEYOR'S CERTIFICATE NGY SHORT PLAT Is Short Plat correctly represents a survey mode byTouMA ENGI�I'`' 9 TOOT 105th AVE SEA .ma or under my direction In conformance with the ? :t4' D SURw� ` RENTON, WA. 98055 M'equtrement, of the appropriate State 'and County- - Statute and 9rdInonCe ipHI`200.5MM "N r°Lsr.Plwr.�'swli[ epp' fin¢ mgpaaiz DWN. BY GATE JOB N0. ` PNOW rZ 2M-0W W {-7-0251 DAN T FEIRRUARY 2002 839-001-O3t 4rbA�ic4l+ 9470 CHKO. BY SCALE SHEER Cartificats Na iJ r m MHT 1' 20 1 OF 1 ATTA ENT ' l --.r f Department of Development and Environmental Services Land Use Services Division 900 Oakesdale Avenue Southwest Renton, Washington 98055.1219 Notice • =, — • (Type 2) File No.: L03SO031 File Name: Ngy Short Plat DDES Planner: Fereshteh Dehkordi DDES Planner Telephone No.: (206) 296-7173 Applicant: Teng Ngy 5563 156" Avenue SE Bellevue, WA 98006 Project Location: 17003 105" Avenue SE, Renton Project Description: Subdivision of a .41 acre parcel into three residential lots in R-8 zone Permits Requested: Short Subdivision Department Decision: Approved with conditions SEPA Threshold Determination- NA Appeal Procedure: Except for shoreline permits which are appealable to the State Shorelines Hearings Board, this decision may be appealed in writing to the King County Hearing Examiner. A notice of appeal must be filed with the Land Use Services Division at the address listed below prior to 4:30 p.m, on July 5, 2004, and be accompanied with a filing fee of $250.00 payable to the King County Office of Finance. If a timely Notice of Appeal has been filed, the appellant shall also file a Statement of Appeal with the Land Use Services Division at the address listed below prior to 4:30 p.m. on July 12, 2004. The Statement of Appeal shall identify the decision being appealed (including the file number) and the alleged errors in that decision. Further, the Statement of Appeal shall state: 1) specific reasons why the decision should be reversed or modified; and 2) the harm suffered or anticipated by the appellant, and the relief sought. The scope of an appeal shall be based on matters or issues raised in the Statement of Appeal. Failure to timely file a Notice of Appeal, appeal fee or Statement of Appeal, deprives the Hearing Examiner of jurisdiction to consider the appeal: Appeals must be submitted to the Department of Development and Environmental Services (DDES) at the following address: DDES--Land Use Services Division Attn: Permit Center 900 ®akesdale Avenue Southwest Renton, Washington 98055-1219 ergo ate ai e If you have any questions regarding the appeal procedures, please contact the Land Use Services Division at (206) 296-6640. If you require this material in braille, audio cassette, or large print, call (206) 296-6640 (voice) or (206) 296-7217 (TTY). MAIN FILE COPY F96\spr3\Notice of Deci•ion.Type2.doc 7/27/99 cic If you wish to receive a copy of the DDES report and decision of this application, complete and return this portion of the notice to the Land Use Services Division at the address listed above. Flee No. ( Pleas Name: Addre: L03SO031 Telephone No.: s's ® C3iTY OF R EN'l ON Economic Development, Neighborhoods and Strategic Planning `1 U55 South Grady Way - Renton Washington 98055 ADDRESS SERVICE REQUESTED DDES Land Use Services Division 900 Oakesdale Avenue SW Renton, WA 98055-1219 IIFIII III h 1111I11111111f1E11i1111I1EEI t ilElrfllifli E1ldi King County Department of Development and Environmental Services Land Use Services Division 900 Oa&esdale Ave SW Renton, WA 98055-1219 L03SO031 — Ngy Short Subdivision DDES Project Number r, �«.�.e. AFFIDAVIT OSTING hereby affirm that I have posted the following: (print name) I X Notice of Permit Application ❑ Other on the "Z-- 3 day of D.,c---- 2003, in accordance with the Department of Development and Environmental Services' requirements. I further affirm that the notice will remain in place and visible during the full required notice period. Notice was provided at the following location(s): 1) 2) 3) C I hereby affirm that the above is a true and correct statement. "—Al r -LA Signature This affidavit must be co pleted and returned to the Land Use Services Division within 7 days of posting. Improper posting or failure to return the affidavit within 7 days shall be cause for the final decision regarding your permit to be postponed. CPSFORMS/AFFIDAVIT OF POSTING.DOC 7/27/99 MA1M W:aLF- coPv 9 ® Department of Development and Environmental Services LJ OAK-€1E-0100 900 Oakesdale Avenue Southwest King County Renton, WA 98055 cFn 23 DEC rGo King County -- Department of Development and Environmental services 900 Oakesdaie Avenue n 98055 219 Southwest Renton, Washington "5bg4s'sif z lift] 1111111111111111111i11}1'I}ISl�elt�i�littlEilE 11}11l�EII King County Department of Development and Environmental Services Land Use Services Division 900 Oakesdale Ave 5W Renton, WA 98055-1219 December 12, 2003 Notice Board & Posting Procedures Instruction Package Notice of Application In accordance with King County Code Section 20.20.060, enclosed you will find instructions, specifications, and materials in order to meet the notice of application posting requirements of the County. Please read these instructions carefully and take action quickly to order your notice board sign. Your notice board sign can be ordered through a sign painter, using the information supplied on page 2 of the enclosed "Notice Board Requirements." The cost of the sign is the responsibility of the applicant. Further processing of your application is dependent upon fulfilling the notice of application posting requirement. When your sign is in place, attach the colored laminated notice of application along with the plastic envelope (containing extra copies of the notice of application) to the notice board as depicted on page 1 of the instructions. Maintain a supply of notices within the plastic envelope throughout the comment period. The posting sign/notice board must remain in place throughout the duration of your application. Immediately u on completion of the above instructions complete the enclosed affidavit of postinp, and return to the Department of Development and Environmental Services, Land Use Division Current Planning Section at the address shown above(envelo e enclosed). Failure to co!nply with posting requirements may be cause for a delay in the processing of your application. If you have any questions, please call the Land Use Services Division at (206) 296-6600. Enclosures: Notice Board Requirements -Application Laminated Notice of Application Waterproof Vinyl Envelope containing copies of the Notice of Application Affidavit of Notice of Application Posting form/LUSD return envelope Notice Board & Posting Procedures instruction Pkg.-NOA 818I01 MAN RLE COPY 101 King County Department of Development and Environmental Services Land Use Services Division 900 Oakesdale Ave SW Renton, WA 98055-1219 L03SO031— N2Y Short Subdivision DDES Project Number 1,� &, 1% IT""; ll!'�,ak 3.•'AFFIi,A�'vIT ' Off' POSTING hereby affirm that I have posted the following: (print name) X Notice of Permit Application ❑ Other on the day of , 2003, in accordance with the Department of Development and Environmental Services' requirements. I further affirm that the notice will remain in place and visible during the full required notice period. Notice was provided at the following location(s): I) 2) 3) I hereby affirm that the above is a true and correct statement. Signature This affidavit must be completed and returned to the Land Use Services Division within 7 days of posting. Improper posting or failure to return the affidavit within 7 days shall be cause for the final decision regarding your permit to be postponed. CPSFORMS/AFFIDAVIT' OF POSTING.DOC 7/27/99 NOTICE BOAR® REQUIREMENTS - NOTICE OF APPLICATION King County Dept. of Development and Environmental Services Land Use Services Division 900 Oakcsdale Avenue Southwest Renton, Washington 98055-1212 Per King County Code Section 20,20.060, a notice board must be prepared and posted for your land use application. Please prepare and post in the following manner: Notice Board Size and Text Specifications The notice board shall be constructed to the specifications described below. The notice board shall display the information shown in the figure. Board Construction: The notice board shall be constructed with 4' x 4' plywood. Professionally prepared plastic notice board overlays, permanently affixed to the board are permissible. Notice boards may be reused but they must be clean and show no evidence of former wording. Lettering style: Helvetica or similar standard typeface 2. Lettering size: Title should be 3" capital letters (NOTICE OF PROPOSED LAND USE ACTION). Other letters should be 2" letters except on the 8'/," x 14" laminated paper providing the details of the proposal. See illustration below for use of capital and lower case letters, and placement of laminated paper and vinyl jacket. 3. Lettering: Black (permanent ink or silk-screen) 4. Background Color: White 5. Logo: King County emblem, in black 6. Laminated Notice of Application on a legal size sheet which provides information regarding the proposed land use application. TO BE SUPPLIED BY Land Use Services Division (LUSD) (see enclosed). 7. Legal size waterproof vinyl jackets with a fold flap, and wrap string. TO BE SUPPLIED BY LUSD (see enclosed). The applicant must make copies of the Notice, place them in the vinyl jacket, and maintain a supply of copies throughout the posting period. 4 FT NOVICE OF PROPOSED LAND USE ACTION King County Department of Development and Environmental Services Land Use Services Division 900 Oakesdale Avenue Southwest Renton, Washington 98055-1219 Call (206) 296-6600 Type of Action: Proposal: File No.: NOTICE OF APPLICATION 8.5" X 14" LAMINATED 4 FT EXAMPLE COPIES OF NOTICE OF APPLICATION IN VINYL JACKET Notice Board Requirements-NOA 8/8/01 Pg 1 ,4" . Sta da ds o o a E n r ,f r L c ting and' Installing'iVoti°ce'13 d The notice board shall be located and installed to the specifications described below. Number of Notice Boards required for this application: ONE Special Instructions: Notice board shall be located: Place the sign facing 105th Ave SE • Midpoint on the site street frontage or as otherwise directed by LUSD staff to maximize visibility. • At a location 5 feet inside from the street property line; a notice board structurally attached to an existing building shall be exempt from the setback provisions, provided that no notice board is located not more than 5 feet from the property line without approval from LUSD staff. • So that the top of the notice board is between 7 to 9 feet above grade. • So that it is easily accessible and totally visible to pedestrians. The applicant shall erect the notice board by solidly setting the post 12 to 18 inches into the ground; or structurally attached it to an existing building. Two 4" x 4" 8-foot-long (minimum) posts and four washers, bolts and nuts (3/8-inch diameter and bolts are 5-inches long) shall be used to install the notice board. Installation Certification The notice board(s) must be installed within 14 days after Land Use Services Division has determined that the application is complete. The enclosed "Affidavit of Posting" must be signed, and returned to the Land Use Services Division within 7 days following the date of posting. Maintenance and Removal of the Notice Board The applicant shall maintain the notice board in good condition throughout the application review period, which shall extend through the time of the final county decision on the proposal and the expiration of any applicable appeal periods. If the notice board is removed, LUSD review of the land use application may be discontinued until the notice board is replaced and has remained in place for the required period of time. TO BE FILLED OUT BYLUSD STAFF NOTICE BOARD TEXT INFORMATION (To Be Given to the Sign Painter) Type of Action: Short Subdivision Proposal: Subdivision of a .41 acre lot into 3 residential lots in the R-8 zone. File No.: L03SO031 NOTE: If you require this material in braille, audio cassette, or large print, please call 206-296-6600 (voice) or for hearing impaired 206-296-7217. Notice Board Requirementa-NOA 8/8/01 P9 2 Rogers, Carol From: Dehkordi, Fereshteh Sent: Thursday, December 11, 2003 1:57 PM To: Rogers, Carol Subject: L03S0031, NOA, Revised Here is a better copy. I changed the address. t.03S0031noa.doc (49 KB) Tha:riks -----Original Message ----- From: Dehkordi, Fereshteh Sent: Thursday, December 11, 2003 1:53 PM To: Rogers, Carol Subject: L03S0031, NOA Carol Could you please mail this tomorrow'? Please have the applicant install one sign facing 105th Avenue SE. Thanks Fereshteh 1 Ro ers, Carol From: Rogers, Carol Sent: Friday, December 12, 2003 2:24 PM To:'leg als.bellevue@kingcountyjournal.com'; 'legals@seattletimes.com' Subject: Legal ads for publ. on Wed., 12117 Please confirm recelnt. Please publish the accompanying, legal notice in your newspaper on WEDNESDAY, December 17, 2003, which will meet our minimum legal notice requirement. Should this not be possible, please call or fax me immediately. Submit your invoice and 3 copies of the affidavit of publication to Accounts Payable, as soon after publication as possible, in order for us to enter legal proof of publication in our file records, and so that we may process same for payment. Attachment: Legal Notice KING COUNTY DEPT. OF DEVELOPMENT & ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES (DDES) 900 Oakesdale Ave SW, Renton, WA 98055-1219 NOTICE OF LAND USE PERMIT APPLICATIONS REQUEST: SHORT SUBDIVISION File: L03SO030 File Name: Megale Short Plat Applicant: Joe Megale Location: Located at 11017 261" Ave SW. Proposal: To subdivide .45 acre lot into 2 residential lots. Project Planner: Fereshteh Dehkordi, (206) 296-7173 COMMENT PROCEDURES: DOES will issue a decision on this application following a 21-day comment period ending on January 22, 2004. Written comments and additional information can be obtained by contacting DOES at the address above or by phoning 206-296-6600. REQUEST: SHORT SUBDIVISION File: L03SO031 File Name: Ngy Short Plat Applicant: Teng Ngy Location: Located at 17003 1051" Ave SE, Renton. Proposal: To subdivide a .41 acre lot into 3 residential lots in the R-8 zone. Project Planner: Fereshteh Dehkordi, (206) 296-7173 COMMENT PROCEDURES: DOES will issue a decision on this application following a 21-day comment period ending on January 20, 2004. Written comments and additional information can be obtained by contacting DOES at the address above or by phoning 206-296-6600. Published this 17", day of December, 2003. cc: Accounts Payable, Administrative Services Division, DOES Application File(s): L03S0030; Megale short plat application notice. L03S0031; Ngy short plat application notice. MAIN FILE COPY Eile Edit Vied Insert Fgrmat Tools Actions Helpse.he l• M; Reply Reply to All I (�Iq Forward i, � P3 x ,6- Q, • ,�, From: Tom Meagher[tom.meagher@)eastsidejournal.com] Sent. Fri 1211212003 2:41 PM To: Rogers, Carol Cc: Subject: RE: Legal ads for publ. on Wed., 12117 Hi, Carol... Happy Friday! have received your email, and will publish the notice (Re/File Nos. W3SO030 and LJ73S0031) in the 12/17/03 edition of the Kng County Journal. Thanks a lot, Carol... have a wonderful weekend! Tom Meagher Legal Advertising Representative King County Journal Newspapers Phone: 425-453-4296 or 253-872-6725 Fax: 425-635-0602 --original Message ---- From: Rogers, Carol[mailto:Cerol.Rogers@METROKC.GOV] Sent: Friday, December 12, 2M3 2:24 PM To:'legals.bellevue@1dngcountyjournal.com';'legals c@seatiletimes.com' Subject: Legal ads for publ. on Wed., 12117 r � 'PIEZWMJOS PILQ W Mtcro5of Friday, Dec 12, 2003 02:43 PM User: plane rog Computer: DE217953 Os: Windows NT Version: 5.1 Legal ads for publ. on Wed., 12/17 Page 1 of 2 Rogers, Carol From: Legals [legals@seattletimes.com] Sent: Friday, December 12, 2003 2:44 PM To: Rogers, Carol Subject: RE: Legal ads for publ. on Wed., 12117 Thanks. -----Original Message ----- From: Rogers, Carol[mailto:Carol. Rogers@METROKC.GOV] Sent: Friday, December 12, 2003 2:24 PM To:'legals.bellevue@kingcountyjournal.com'; Legals Subject: Legal ads for publ. on Wed., 12/17 Please confirm receipt. Please publish the accompanying, legal notice in your newspaper on WEDNESDAY December 17, 2003, which will meet our minimum legal notice requirement. Should this not be possible, please call or fax me immediately. Submit your invoice and 3 copies of the affidavit of publication to Accounts Payable, as soon after publication as ossible, in order for us to enter legal proof of publication in our file records, and so that we may process same for payment. Attachment: Legal Notice KING COUNTY DEPT. OF DEVELOPMENT & ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES (DDES) 900 Oakesdale Ave SW, Renton, WA 98055-1219 NOTICE OF LAND USE PERMIT APPLICATIONS REQUEST: SHORT SUBDIVISION File: L03SO030 File Name: Megale Short Plat Applicant: Joe Megale Location: Located at 11017 261h Ave SW. Proposal: To subdivide .45 acre lot into 2 residential lots. Project Planner: Fereshteh Dehkordi, (206) 296-7173 COMMENT PROCEDURES: DDES will issue a decision on this application following a 21-day comment period ending on January 22, 2004. Written comments and additional information can be obtained by contacting DDES at the address above or by phoning 206-296-6600. REQUEST: SHORT SUBDIVISION File: L03SO031 File Name: Ngy Short Plat Applicant: Teng Ngy Location: Located at 17003 10V1 Ave SE, Renton. Proposal: To subdivide a .41 acre lot into 3 residential lots in the R-8 zone. Project Planner: Fereshteh Dehkordi, (206) 296-7173 COMMENT PROCEDURES: DDES will issue a decision on this application following a 21-day comment period ending on Jam 20, 2004. Written comments and additional 12/12/2003 Legal ads for publ. on Wed., 12/17 Page 2 of 2 information can be obtained by contacting DDES at the address above or by phoning 206-296-6600. Published this 17th day of December, 2003. cc: Accounts Payable, Administrative Services Division, DDES Application File(s): 1-03S0030; Megale short plat application notice. t_03S0031; Ngy short plat application notice. l 2/ 12/2003 A Affidavit of Publication 2415558 / 2 State of Washington, Counties of King and Snohomish, Daniel S. O'Neal being duly sworn, says that he/she is the Authorized Agent of Seattle Times Company, publisher of The Seattle Times and representing the Seattle Post-Intelligencer, separate newspapers published daily in King and Snohomish Counties, State of Washington: that they are newspapers of general circulation in said Counties and State; that they have been approved as legal newspapers•by orders of the Superior. Court.of King -and Snohomish Counties; that the annexed, being a classified advertisement, was published in: Newspfi er ► Ptt11 t1Q4-Date . The Seattle Times 12/17/03 And not in a supplement thereof, and is a true copy of the notice as it was printed and/or distributed in the regular and entire issue of said paper or papers during all of said period, and that said newspaper or newspapers were regularly distributed to its subscribers during all of said period. Xs. Subscribed and sworn to before me this 18th day of December, 2003 M004 amm Notary Public in d for the State of Washington residing at Seattle .i!.0404 shah Plug ;rXalAp;p( 11017 26th � oeHORT. ' iION': 110�#�.h1114Q3�q ih net,- 1,91fi, 49Y of . MAN ALE COPY i1 lam" M 0 0 .a -t STATE OF WASHINGTON, COUNTY OF KING } AFFIDAVIT OF PUBLICATION .PUBLIC NOTICE Lily Nguyen, being first duly sworn on oath that she is a Legal Advertising Representative of the King County Journal a daily newspaper, which newspaper is a legal newspaper of general circulation and is now and has been for more than six months prior to the date of publication hereinafter referred to, published in the English language continuously as a daily newspaper in King County, Washington. The King County Journal has been approved as a Legal Newspaper by order of the Superior Court of the State of Washington for King County. The notice in the exact form annexed was published in regular issues of the King County Journal (and not in supplement form) which was regularly distributed to its subscribers during the below stated period. The annexed notice, a Notice of Building Permit Application was published on Wednesday, 12/17/03 The full amount of the fee charged for said foregoing publication is the sum of $172.75 at the rate of $29.00 per inch for the first publication and N/A per inch for ea subsequent in rtion. e. Lily guyen Legal Adveyfising Representative, King County Journal Subscribed hnd sworn to me this 1711 day of December, 2001. . Tom A. Meagher �� �1` • _,:No �xp;••.� Notary Public for the State of Washington, Residing in Redmond, Wi§l;4VtPn ARYre' '• Ad Number: 844931 P.O. Number: _ : o �0 © Cost of publishing this notice includes an affidavit surcharge. ��, O ' o' % Or OF KING COUNTY DEPT. OF DEVELOPMENT & ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES (DDES) 900 Oakesdale Ave SW, Renton WA 98055-1219 NOTICE OF LAND USE PERMM REQUEST; SHORT aonms . . File: 1JR3S0030 File Name: Megale Short Plat Applicant: Joe Megale - Location: Located at 11017 26th Ave SW. Proposal. To subdivide .45 acre lot into 2 residential lots. Project Planner: Fereshteh Dehkordi, (206)296-7173 COMMENT PROCEDURES: DDES will issue , a decision on this appli- cation following a 21-day comment period ending on January 22. 2004, Written' comments and additional information can be obtained by con- tacting DDES at the address above or by phoning 206-296-6600, REQUEST':. SHORT SUBDIVIS1 File:IMS0031 File Name: Ngy Short Plat Applicant: Teng Ngy Location: Located at 17003 105th Ave SE, Renton. Proposal: To subdivide a .41 acrelot into 3 residential lots in the R-8 zone. Project Planner: Fereshteh Dehkordi, (206)296-7173 COMMENT PROCEDURES: DDES Will issue a decision on this appli- cation following a 21-day comment period ending on 2 Written comments and additional information can be obtained by con- tacting DDES at the address above or by phoning 206-296-6600. Published . in the Ding County Journal December 17, 2003. #844931 E0971ulo, Department of Development and Environmental Services Land Use Services Division 900 Oakesdale Avenue Southwest Renton, Washington 98055-1219 N ice of A���lic�tion (Type 2) The Department of Development and Environmental Services (DDES) will issue a decision on this application following a 21-day public comment period which ends on January 20, 2004. Written comments on this application must be submitted to DDES at the address below. A public hearing is not required for this application prior to the DDES decision. However, the DDES decision may be appealed to the King County Hearing Examiner, who would conduct an appeal hearing prior to making a decision on the appeal. Details of the appeal process will be included in the notice of decision. Any person wishing additional information on this proposed project should contact planner at the phone number listed above. You may review the application and any environmental documents or studies in our Renton office. NOTE: If you require this material in braille, audio cassette,.or large print, please call (206) 296-6600 (voice) or (206) 296-72I7 (TTY). Department of Development and Environmental Services Land Use Services Division 900 Oakesdale Avenue Southwest Renton, Washington 98055-1219 Date of Mailing. December 26, 2003 If you wish to receive a copy of the DDES report and decision of this application, complete and return this portion of the notice to the Land Use Services Division at the address listed above. File No. L03SO031 ( Please print ) Name: Address: Telephone No.: 1 MAIN FILE COPY 1 DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPM2N1 AND tNVlmmmLnoI i n—I E.M,M*d Old aypro,W t* _ day of 20— W—W. LaW V. 5.1k.e DM.. ► =bW and a!prerrd Oft — MY of 2(L, DrnWwmwt D'I*W . Jab �.9102' LKamkW end appr.Wd thl. day of . 20— A— Wouty Ano..dr r Ao.nunt N~ DOa7DO-0133-01 EX. HOUSE 4 I, I 0.17 arras ; 50.00' I' II ,1+ 4 �t— I .r I 8 "6'4a' W car I .2 6.826. sq.fL 0.15:acres •', N88'IB'•$6 3' WATER MAIN EASFt, ' RECARDwG N0. 4513645 , --. LEGAL DESCRIPTI' �EAST 1/2 OF LOT 10 IN BLOCK 2 OF AKEWS FARM N0. 5, AS PER •. fLAT RECORDED IN VOLUME 40 OF PLATS, PACE 27, RECORDS OF KING COUNTY: SITUATE IN THE COUNTY OF KING, STATE OF WASHINGTON. BB96'46' I � . I I � SI 30�.,4�010.3 e.gJt .7 cs -_� tr: - W 1YAL41- I EX. HOUSE SCALE. 1pOR-nON OF NE 1/4 OF SYdI 1/4 of SEC 29 rMIL 23 N.RG 5 E. 1Lki 34MOO' S 88T6'I6.7 SE 172tD S7)?EET I I i . I • I SURVEY NOTES. INSTRUMENT! MKON TOTAL STATION OTLAIOLO METHOD USED: FIELD TRAVERSE WITH ACTUAL — "30' 1 3(y i+ MEASUREMENTS AND ANGLES WRELD 32 I 090 GATE OF SURVEY APRIL, 2003 BASIS OF BEARINQ NBBW12'E, SE 172ND STREET PLAT OF AKER S FARM N0. 5 BENCHMARK: SSMH AT SE OOWIER OF PROPERTY `-08 RIM 8" - 200.39 (SOOK GREiK) OWNER/DEVELOPER TEND NGY AND MORENY NGY i i I 5563 156th AVE SE I I I BETI VUF, WA 98006 p, I 425-053-3402 0 LAND SURVEYbR i I ^TOUMA• SURVEYORS 8632 S 191st PLACE SUITE E-102' ' KENT. WASHINGTON 98032 `i 425-251-0965 I 1 a ZONING INFORMATION • �.-.r•.. b I r �. 204 TOTAL ACREAGE 0.41 ACRES TOTL LOTS A3 LOTS •IIEi ... f ZiMtE R8S0' ROAD AREA ' 0 SMALLEST 40T 3410 S.F PROPOSED � I ' USE SINGLE FAW{LY HOME SOIL TYPE ALDERDWOOD A9C , ' •' DRAINAGE WELL DRAINED •,` rVEOEUT10N GRASS ' I • LEGEND f ' I 'K ® OB (TYPE 1) a TELEPHONE CABIN r SANITARY SEMR MH M13N I ® N WATER 'VALVE CONIFER TREE .. I' 20 WATER METER/SERVICE DECIDUOUS TREE I'• I 2b FIRE HYDRANT c' MATL BOX , UTILITY POLE + PK NAIL (-- GUY WIRE ® MON IN CASE/ 30' ,I •. v ° EX REBAR / PIPE �, , . AS NOTED I• ! i��vC N0Y 1114 M03 � w SE 1MD S — K,C D.D.E S. T^ r — . 'W 68'03'12' E (BASIS Or BEARING) J LAND SURVEYOR'S CERTIFICATE tx� NGY SHORT PLAT s Short Plat correctly reprevents a survey mode Dy gTOUMA FNGIN74°' 7043 1 G5th AVE SE'� I', Me or under my direction in conformance with the do -LAND SURVEYORS RENTON, WA. 98055 [requirements of the appropriate State'and CountyStatute OWN. BY T DATE FEWUARY2002 Joe No. 632-001-031 and dlnanee i 2OW eW 501+P+ +nST RAM Sr W C—%W • AZW. W fMICAR IfOa7oDAN _ CHKD. 8Y SCALE SHEET Certificate No. !fl........ MHT 7' - 20. 1 OF 1 ti'y Department of Development and Environmental Services Land Use Services Division 900 Oakesdale Avenue Southwest Renton, Washington 98055-1219 (Type 2) Applicant: Teng Ngy File NO.: L03SO031 5563 156" Avenue SE Bellevue, WA 98006 DDES Planner: Fereshteh Dehkordi DDES Planner Telephone No. (206) 296-7173 e-mail: fereshteh.dehkordi@mctrokc.l;oy Date Application Filed: November 14, 2003 Date Determined Complete: December 11, 2003 Project Location: 17003 105'" Avenue SE, Renton Project Description: Short subdivision of a .41 acre lot into three residential lots in R-8 zone. Permits requested in this application: Short Subdivision Relevant environmental documents are available at the above address: ❑ Yes ❑ Not Applicable Development regulations to be used for project mitigation, known at this time: KCC19 (Subdivision Code); KCC 21A (Zoning); KCC 14 (Road Standards); KCC 9 (SWDM) Consistency with applicable County plans and regulations: This proposal will be reviewed for compliance with all applicable King County codes including Roads Standards, Surface Water Design Manual, and Sensitive Areas Codes. Other permits not included in this application, known at this time: NA The Department of Development and Environmental Services (DDES) will issue a decision on this application following a 21-day public comment period which ends on January 20, 2004. Written comments on this application must be submitted to DDES at the address below. A public hearing is not required for this application prior to the DDES decision. However, the DDES decision may be appealed to the King County Hearing Examiner, who would conduct an appeal hearing prior to making a decision on the appeal. Details of the appeal process will be included in the notice of decision. Any person wishing additional information on this proposed project should contact planner at the phone number listed above. You may review the application and any environmental documents or studies in our Renton office. NOTE: If you require this material in braille, audio cassette, or large print, please call (206) 296-6600 (voice) or (206) 296-7217 (TTY). Department of Development and Environmental Services Land Use Services Division 900 Oakesdale Avenue Southwest Renton, Washington 98055-1219 Date of Mailing: December 26, 2003 If you wish to receive a copy of the DDES report and decision of this application, complete and return this portion of the notice to the Land Use Services Division at the address listed above. File No. L03SO031 ( Please print ) Name: Address: Telephone No.: B DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOFMLNI ANtr LIVv,KurWr jl acts wr co C* 1e .d and apiw*r d WS _ pay of 20— Mawq.r, Land Ur. SAc_ Dw4ion Elr h6d Wd appmwd thb T„ day of 20_ 0n'popmwrt Enginw 190 __j._W2' 'II Err b.d and eppre»d this — day of — 20— AmM Deputy A-n -, Aaeaunt N.,M. OD8700-0133-01 a � LOU!_� 1 - ---- - - I 4 I T 1 i +; 1 , 0.17 acres I. I ` r_, 8818�48'W a1 I ' I 7&36' - - I BB'18'48` W V- I , I ' LOT I' 2 I 01826. sq.ft K 0.15:acres I' 1 .. I 1 I `I _ _ '� utaa�r -. 3' WATER MAIN 45136ENT-..:-J RECORDING N0, 4513Fi45 Ij R LEGAL. DESCRIPT104 ` ..:EAST 1/2 OF LOT 10 IN BLOCK 2 OF AKER'S FARM NO. 5, AS PER ". PLAT RECORDED IN VOLUME 40 OF PLATS. PAGE 27, RECORDS OF KING COUNTY; ' SITUATE IN THE COUNTY OF KING, STATE OF WASHINGTON. �1 •` I -I- -3,4f0. I 14k ---'` 0.07 acres'. i i28:41' + EK HOUSE SCALE: PORTION OF NE 1'/4 OF SW 1/4 of SEC 29.TWN. 23 N.RG $ E. W.M. SE 172f D SIREFT F j SURVEY NOTES I INSTRUMENT. NIKON TOTAL STATION DTMAioUG METHOD USED,. FED TRAVERSE WITH ACTUAL FIELD MEASUREMENTS AND ANGLES 30 WAC 332-130-090 DATE OF SURVEYAPRIL, 2003 1 I BASES OF BEARNG: NBBD,T'127- SE 172ND STREET l PLAT OF AKER'S FARM NO. 5 BENCHMARK: SSMH AT SE CORNER OF PROPERTY I I ---20S RIM ELEV . 200.39 (SODK CREEK) i 1 ..I... I OWNER/DEVELOPER I I TENG NGY AND MORENY NGY I 1 5583 156th AVE SE I I I 1 BELUWE, WA 98006 425-653-3402 - '1 r LAND SURVEYOR +' . ' I `,• I ENGINEERS r 6632 S 91stPLACE SUITE E-1 2' KENT, WASHINGTON 98032 425-251-D665 x I I # k `11-204 ZONING INFORMATION TOTAL ACREAGE 0.41 ACRES TOTAL LOTS 3 LOTS +I `d IS rn J ZONE R650 ' ROAD AREA 0 lI SMALLEST LOT 3410 S.F PROPOSED USE SINGLE FAMILY HOME + t SOIL TYPE DRAINAGE ALDEROW00D AgC . WELL DRAINED VEGETATION LEGEND CRASS �r r i 1 Q I ® G C8 (TYPE 1) SANITARY SEWER MH N WATER VALVE TB WATER METER/SERVICE ♦ 201 FIRE HYDRANT 4 TELEPHONE CABINE SIGN �Y"'�r CONIFER TREE 0 DECIDUOUS TREE 0' MAIL BOX - I e ® �. 0- UTILITY POLE F— GUY WIRE PK NAIL s MON IN CASE/ 30. I Y I .... o IX FiEBAR /PIPE AS NOTED li ll NOV 14 2003 li+ SE }r%ZVD Jr K.C. D.D.ES. � N 88T If E (BASIS OF BEARING)' J URVEYOR'S CERTIFICATE represents a survey made by Li'76SO-runder my direction ir1 conformance with the of the appropriate State 'and County and dlrtance i 2003 Certificate NO. �TOUMA ENGINEAEMS & .LAND SURICYGRS ' ew SWW rerST ALMOE stm f-rar • AEVE W40mv;OWN. L03.S4®31- �T;Hr .,�CHKp. NGY SHORT PLATcorrectly 17003 105th AVE SE� RENTON, WA. 98055 BY T DATE FEBRUARY 2002 JOB NO.-°�70DAN 839-001-031 BY MHT SCALE � 4- 20' SHEET 1 OF 1 I DONALDSON, JAMES L03SO031 17003 105TH AVE SE RENTON, WA 98055 NYG, TENG L03SO031 5563 156TH AVE SE BELLEVUE, WA 98006 TOM TOUMA L03SO031 TOUMA ENGINEERS 6632 S. 191 ST PL #E-102 KENT, WA 98032 0087000147/1,03S0031 2923059046/1,03S0031 AMIRI ALI R ANDERTON LUCILLE L 9485747777/1,03S0031 4219 86TH AV SE 3251 CEDAR AV S MERCER ISLAND WA 98040 RENTON WA 98055 2923059189/1,03S0031 9485740030/1-03S0031 0087000188/1,03S0031 ANDERTON LUCILLE L AQUINO NOEL L+CHIN MEI CHI RARNES JAMES 3251 CEDAR AV S 1226 S 35TH ST 16839 106TH AV SE RENTON WA 98055 RENTON WA 98055 RENTON WA 98055 0087000142/1,03S0031 0087000196/L03S0031 9485740040IL03SO031 BINKLEY CHRISTOPHER HL+MICH BLUMENTHAL G H BRADSHAW DONALD W+LEIGH D 17032 104TH AV SE 16830 105TH AV SE 1220 S 35TH ST RENTON WA 98055 RENTON WA 98055 RENTON WA 98055 0087000132/L03S0031 0087000180/1,03S0031 0087000182/L03S0031 BRAUNSCHWEIG RICHARD D+CARO BUNKER ARNOLD J BUNKER ARNOLD J 16842 104TH AV SE 16804 105TH S E 16804 105TH S E RENTON WA 98055 RENTON WA 98055 RENTON WA 980S5 0087000114/1,03S0031 008700015 1 /L03S0031 9485740200/L03S0031 BUSKIRK TAMIKO M VAN CASIO JAVIER AGOMEZ+LUZ MARIA CHAU ALEX+VIEN R1 M 16803 105TH AV SE 17031 105TH AV SE 3130 MAIN AV S RENTON WA 98058 RENTON WA 98055 RENTON WA 98055 008700018GIL0350031 PL33/L03S0031 PL50/L03S0031 C 870001ANSON DA1 B CITY OF RENTON CITY OF RENTON 16815 TIAN AV D ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT DIVISION DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DIVISION RENTON 106TH WA 98SE 1055 SOUTH GRADY WAY 1055 SOUTH GRADY WAY RENTON WA 98055 RENTON WA 98055 0087000130/L03S0031 0087000192/L03S0031 9485740010/1,03S0031 CONNER HEATH E+MAYUMI CRAMPTON BARRY+DAWN L DACQUEL DANILEE S 17000 104TH AV SE 16820 105TH AV SE 1238 S 35TH ST RENTON WA 98055 RENTON WA 98055 RENTON WA 98055 PL18/1-03S0031 0087000121/1-03S0031 2923059010/L03S0031 EDWARD WHITE DEJESUS ISAGANI M+CECILIA L EASTEY RICHARD F KENT ENGINEERING DEPT 16828 104TH AVE S E 9275 42ND AV S 220 4TH AVE S RENTON WA 98055 SEATTLE WA 98118 KENT WA 98032 0087000118/1,03S0031 0087000146/1-03S0031 0087000283/L03S0031 FALLGREEN BRUCE W JR GOOD SHEPHERD OF WA HEADLAND GREGGORY A+LISA MARIE 16817 105TH AV SE 119 N MAIN ST 17030 106TH AV SE RENTON WA 98055 PORTERVILLE CA 93257 RENTON WA 98055 0087000183/1-03S0031 0087000184/1,03S0031 2923059161/1,03S0031 HEISE ROBERT E HEISE ROBERT HIPP JOHN L+KATHI L 16818 105TH AV SE 16818 105TH AV SE 3451 CEDAR AV S RENTON WA 98055 RENTON WA 98055 RENTON WA 98055 0087000211/L03S0031 0087000119/L03S0031 0087000134/L03S0031 HIRANAKA GARTH L+SUSAN R HODGE JERRY G+GINA L HOWARD JEFFREY S & LYNN K 10636 SE 166TH ST 16815 105TH AV SE 17014 104TH AV SE RENTON WA 98055 RENTON WA 98055 RENTON WA 98055 948574021011.03S0031 94857404801L03S0031 9485740460/1,03S0031 JEFFERSON BENJAMIN A+BREGEI KARTES CYNTHIA KARTES CYNTHIA 3124 MAIN AV S 3401 BENSON DR S 3401 BENSON DR S RENTON WA 98058 RENTON WA 98055 RENTON WA 98055 0087000256/1,03S0031 PL19/L03S003I 008700013111-03S0031 KELLY MELVIN G KENT PLANNING DEPT KING MARGARET J 16836 106TH AV SE 220 4TH AVE S 16829 105TH AVE S E RENTON WA 98055 KENT WA 98032 RENTON WA 98055 0087000203/1,03S0031 008700020811-03S0031 0087000207/1-03S0031 KOGER DANIEL+PHYLLIS KUHLMANN DOUGLAS D & GAIL J KUHLMANN DOUGLAS D & GAIL J 17023 106TH AV SE 1529 E OCEAN SHORES BL SW 1529 E OCEAN SHORES BL SW RENTON WA 98055 OCEAN SHORES WA 98569 OCEAN SHORES WA 98569 0087000115/1,03S0031 0087000214/L03S0031 0087000138/1-03S0031 LITTLEFIELD HEATHER L MARAGH DEIGHTON S MCCANNON TIM 16809 105TH AV SE 10526 SE 172ND ST 17007 105TH AV SE RENTON WA 98055 RENTON WA 98055 RENTON WA 98058 0087000205IL03SO031 2923059103/1,03S0031 0087000198/L03S0031 MIDGETT ROBERT L JR MILLER THOMAS MILLER WILLIAM R 17012 105TH ST SE 3507 CEDAR AV S PO BOX 75 RENTON WA 98055 RENTON WA 98055 RENTON WA 98055 0087000116/1-03S0031 0087000139/1-03S0031 0087000260/1,03S0031 NELLIS DARIC C NEWMAN REGGIE L NEWTON JAY N 16814 104TH AV SE 17013 105TH AV SE 17006 106TH AV SE RENTON WA 98055 RENTON WA 98055 RENTON WA 98055 0087000255/1-03S0031 9485740220/L03S0031 008700013311-03S0031 NEWTON JEFFRY M+JAY H NGUYEN TRUC DINH NGY TENG 16838 106TH AV SE 31 IS MAIN AV S 5563 156TH AV SE RENTON WA 98058 RENTON WA 98055 BELLEVUE WA 98006 SDI3/1,03S0031 0087000250/L03S0031 0087000194/1-03S0031 R. STRACKE, FACILITIES & PLANNING OLLIVER MARTYN J PITTS GARFIELD W RENTON SCHOOL DISTRICT #403 321 BURNETT AV S 17013 106TH S E 1220 N 4TH ST RENTON WA 98055 RENTON WA 98055 RENTON WA 98055 0087000275/1-03S0031 0087000181/L03SO031 0087000126/1-03S0031 RADTKE MICHAL THOMAS RAGLE ROBERT L RISKE EUGENE L 17024 106TH AV SE 16805 106TH AV SE 16821 105TH AV SE RENTON WA 98055 RENTON WA 98055 RENTON WA 98055 0087000148/LO3SO031 0087000152/LO3SO031 STATE OF WASHINGTON STATE OF WASHINGTON 0087000265/LO3SO031 0087000270/LO3SO031 SUBIC FRANCES SANDERS SUBIC GEORGE & FRANCES PO BOX 89 PO BOX 89 RENTON WA 98057 RENTON WA 98057 0087000125/1-03SO031 0087000120/1,03SO031 SWEET BILL T+MAI MARILEE K TATRO DON L 16832 104TH AV SE 3211 TALBOT RD S RENTON WA 98055 RENTON WA 98055 9485740230/LO3S0031 9485740150/1-03SO031 VONG CON V VUONG KEVIN+JANIE WONG 3112 MAIN AV S 1129 S 34TH ST RENTON WA 98055 RENTON WA 98055 9485740190/1,03S0031 0087000143/1,03S0031 WORSHAM PAUL A YADOCK WENDY & DAVID. 3136 MAIN AV S 17020 104TH AV SE RENTON WA 98055 RENTON WA 98055 9485740050IL03SO031 ZARATE JOSE MARI S+ESTRELLI 1214 S 35TH ST RENTON WA 98055 0087000150/1,03SO031 STATE OF WASHINGTON 0087000201/1,03SO031 SWEANEY DARREN+BOBBIE 17004 105TH AV SE RENTON WA 98055 9485740020/1-03SO031 TRUONG THOMAS+AMANDA 1232 S 35TH ST RENTON WA 98058 0087000153/L63SO031 WA STATE DEPRT OF TRANSPORT M & 0 FACILITIES OFFICE ATT: THANH NGUYEN MS47328 OLYMPIA WA 98504 0087000213/1,03S0031 YOST DAVID 17029 106TH AV SE RENTON WA 98055 Department of Development and Environmental Services Lund Use Services Division 900 Oakesdale Avenue Southwest Renton, Washington 98055-1219 File No.: L03SO031 DDES Planner: Fereshteh Dehkordi DDES Planner Telephone No.: (206) 296-7173 Applicant: Teng Ngy 5563 156"' Avenue SE Bellevue, WA 98006 Project Location. 17003 105" Avenue SE, Renton N('dce 13 f D 'e, k; I --J) 10 9,0 File Name: Ngy Short Plat (Type 2) Project Description: Subdivision of a .41 acre parcel into three residential lots in R-8 zone Permits Requested: Short Subdivision Department Decision: Approved with conditions SEPA Threshold Determination: NA Appeal Procedure: Except for shoreline pen -nits which are appealable to the State Shorelines Hearings Board, this decision may be appealed in writing to the King County Hearing Examiner. A notice of appeal must be filed with the Land Use Services Division at the address listed below prior to 4:30 p.m. on July 6, 2004, and be accompanied with a filing fee of $250,00 payable to the King County Office of Finance. If a timely Notice of Appeal has been filed, the appellant shall also file a Statement of Appeal with the Land Use Services Division at the address listed below prior to 4:30 p.m. on July 13, 2004. The Statement of Appeal shall identify the decision being appealed (including the file number) and the alleged errors in that decision. Further, the Statement of Appeal shall state: 1) specific reasons why the decision should be reversed or modified; and 2) the harm suffered or anticipated by the appellant, and the relief sought. The scope of an appeal shall be based on matters or issues raised in the Statement of Appeal. Failure to timely file a Notice of Appeal, appeal fee or Statement of Appeal, deprives the Hearing Examiner of jurisdiction to consider the appeal. Appeals must be submitted to the Department of Development and Environmental Services (DDES) at the following address: DDES--Land Use Services Division Attn: Permit Center 900 ®akesdale Avenue Southwest Renton, Washington 98055-1219 Date Mailed: June 18, 2004 If you have any questions regarding the appeal procedures, please contact the planner at the phone number listed above. if you require this material in braille, audio cassette, or large print, call (206) 296-6600 (voice) or (206) 296-7217 (TTY). MAIN FILE COPY DE-HKORDI,FERESHTEH PROJECT MANAGER It DDES/LUSD DONALDSON, JAMES 17003 105TH AVE SE RENTON, WA 98055 FOSTER, CURT SR. ENGINEER DDES/LUSD LIND, REBECCA CITY OF RENTON EDNSP I055 S. GRADY WAY RENTON, WA 98055 MCCANNON, TIM 17007 105TI1 AVE SE RENTON, WA 98055 RENTON, WA 98055 NYG, TENG 5563 156TH AVE SE BELLEVUE, WA 98006 TOM TOUMA TOUMA ENGINEERS 6632 S. 19IST PL NE-102 KL'NT, WA 98032 L03S0031 s L03SO031 L03S0031 L03S0031 L03S0031 L03S0031 L03S0031 �\ 0087000147/1-03S0031 9485747777IL03SO031 ` AMIRI ALI R 4219 86TH AV SE MERCER ISLAND WA 98040 2923059189/L03S0031 9485740030/L03S0031 ANDERTON LUCILLE L AQUINO NOEL L+CHIN MEI CHI 3251 CEDAR AV S 1226 S 35TH ST RENTON WA 98055 RENTON WA 98055 0087000142/1,03S0031 BINKLEY CHRISTOPHER HL+MICH 17032 104TH AV SE RENTON WA 98055 0087000132/1,03S0031 BRAUNSCHWEIG RICHARD D+CARO 16842 104TH AV SE RENTON WA 98055 0087000114/1-03S0031 BUSKIRK TAMIKO M VAN 16803 105TH AV SE RENTON WA 98058 0087000186IL03SO031 CHRISTIANSON DAVID B 16815 106TH AV SE RENTON WA 98055 0087000130/1.03S0031 CONNER HEATH E+MAYUMI 17000 104TH AV SE RENTON WA 98055 0087000121/1-03S0031 DEJESUS 1SAGANI M+CECILIA L 16828 104TH AVE S E RENTON WA 98055 0087000118/L03S0031 FALLGREEN BRUCE W JR 16817 105TH AV SE RENTON WA 98055 0087000196/L03S0031 BLUMENTHAL G H 16830 105TH AV SE RENTON WA 98055 0087000180/1-03S0031 BUNKER ARNOLD J 16804 105TH S E RENTON WA 98055 0087000151/L03S0031 CASIO JAVIER AGOMEZ+LUZ MARIA 17031 105TH AV SE RENTON WA 98055 PI.33/1,03 S0031 CITY OF RENTON ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT DIVISION 1055 SOUTH GRADY WAY RENTON WA 98055 0087000192/L03S0031 CRAMPTON BARRY+DAWN L 16820 105TH AV SE RENTON WA 98055 2923059010/1-03S0031 EASTEY RICHARD F 9275 42ND AV S SEATTLE WA 98118 0087000146/L03S0031 GOOD SHEPHERD OF WA 119 N MAIN ST PORTERVILLE CA 93257 2923059046/L03S0031 ANDERTON LUCILLE L 3251 CEDAR AV S RENTON WA 98055 0087000188/L03S0031 BARNES JAMES 16839 106TH AV SE RENTON WA 98055 9485740040/L03S0) BRADS ON L GH D 1220 S 3 RENTON 98055 0087000182/L03S0031 BUNKER ARNOLD J 16804 105TH S E RENTON WA 98055 9485740200/1,03S0031 CHAU ALEX+VIEN Rl M 3130 MAIN AV S RENTON WA 98055 PL50/1,03S0031 CITY OF RENTON DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DIVISION 1055 SOUTH GRADY WAY RENTON WA 98055 9485740010/L03S0031 DACQUEL DANILEE S 1238 S 35TH ST RENTON WA 98055 PL181L03SO031 EDWARD WHITE KENT ENGINEERING DEPT 220 4TH AVE S KENT WA 98032 0087000283/L03S0031 HEADLAND GREGGORY A+LISA MARIE 17030 106TH AV SE RENTON WA 98055 0087000183/L03S0031 0087000184/1-03S0031 2923059161/1,03S0031 HEISE ROBERT E HEISE ROBERT HIPP JOHN L+KATHI L 16818 105TH AV SE 16818 105TH AV SE 3451 CEDAR AV S RENTON WA 98055 RENTON WA 98055 RENTON WA 98055 0' 0087000211/L03S0031 0087000119/1,03S0031 0087000134/L03SO031 HIRANAKA GARTH L+SUSAN R HODGE JERRY G+GINA L HOWARD JEFFREY S & LYNN K 10636 SE 166TH ST 16815 105TH AV SE 17014 104TH AV SE RENTON WA 98055 RENTON WA 98055 RENTON WA 98055 9485740210/LO3SO031 9485740480IL03SO031 9485740460/1-03SO031 JEFFERSON BENJAMIN A+BREGEI KARTES CYNTHIA KARTES CYNTHIA 3124 MAIN AV S 3401 BENSON DR S 3401 BENSON DR S RENTON WA 98058 RENTON WA 98055 RENTON WA 98055 0087000256/LO3SO031 PL19/L03S0031 0087000131/1,03SO031 KELLY MELVIN G KENT PLANNING DEPT KING MARGARET J 16836 106TH AV SE 220 4TH AVE S 16829 105TH AVE S E RENTON WA 99055 KENT WA 98032 RENTON WA 98055 0087000203/1,03SO031 0087000208/LO3SO031 0087000207/1,03SO031 KOGER DANIEL+PHYLLIS KUHLMANN DOUGLAS D & GAIL J KUHLMANN DOUGLAS D & GAIL J 17023 106TH AV SE 1529 E OCEAN SHORES BL SW 1529 E OCEAN SHORES BL SW RENTON WA 98055 OCEAN SHORES WA 98569 OCEAN SHORES WA 98569 0087000115/1-03SO031 0087000214/LO3S0031 008700013811,03S0031 LITTLEFIELD HEATHER L MARAGH DEIGHTON S MCCANNON TIM 16809 105TH AV SE 10526 SE 172ND ST 17007 105TH AV SE RENTON WA 98055 RENTON WA 98055 RENTON WA 98058 0087000205/L03S0031 2923059103/LO3SO031 0087000198IL03SO031 MIDGETT ROBERT L JR MILLER THOMAS MILLER WILLIAM R 17012 105TH ST SE 3507 CEDAR AV S PO BOX 75 RENTON WA 98055 RENTON WA 98055 RENTON WA 98055 0087000116/1-03S6031 0087000139/LO3SO031 0087000260/1-03SO031 NELLIS DARIC C NEWMAN REGGIE L NEWTON JAY N 16814 104TH AV SE 17013 105TH AV SE 17006 106TH AV SE RENTON WA 98055 RENTON WA 98055 RENTON WA 98055 0087000255/1,03SO031 9485740220/LO3SO031 0087000133/1,03SO031 NEWTON JEFFRY M+JAY H NGUYEN TRUC DINH NGY TENG 16838 106TH AV SE 3118 MAIN AV S 5563 156TH AV SE RENTON WA 98058 RENTON WA 98055 BELLEVUE WA 98006 0087000250/LO 0 3k 0087000194/L03S0031 SD13/L03S0031 OLLI R PITTS GARFIELD W R. STRACKE, FACILITIES & PLANNING 321 B S 17013 106TH S E RENTON SCHOOL DISTRICT#403 REN F 98 55 RENTON WA 98055 1220 N 4TW ST RENTON WA 98055 0087000275/L03S0031 0087000181IL03SO031 0087000126/1,03S0031 RADTKE MICHAL THOMAS RAGLE ROBERT L RISKE EUGENE L 17024 106TH AV SE 16805 106TH AV SE 16821 105TH AV SE RENTON WA 98055 RENTON WA 98055 RENTON WA 98055 0087000148/1-03S0031 0087000152/L03S0031 0087000150/1,03S0031 STATE OF WASHINGTON STATE OF WASHINGTON STATE OF WASHINGTON 0087000265/1,03S0031 0087000270/1,03S0031 0087000201/L03S0031 SUBIC FRANCES SANDERS SUBIC GEORGE & FRANCES SWEANEY DARREN+BOBBIE PO BOX 89 PO BOX 89 17004 105TH AV SE RENTON WA 98057 RENTON WA 98057 RENTON WA 98055 0087000125/1,03S0031 0087000120/L03S0031 94857400201L03S0031 SWEET BILL T+MAI MARILEE K TATRO DON L TRUONG THOMAS+AMANDA 16832 104TH AV SE 3211 TALBOT RD S 1232 S 35TH ST RENTON WA 98055 RENTON WA 98055 RENTON WA 98058 9485740230/L03S0031 9485740150I1,03S0031 0087000153/L03S0031 VONG CON V VUONG KEVIN+JANIE WONG WA STATE DEPRT OF TRANSPORT 3112 MAIN AV S 1129 S 34TH ST M & O FACILITIES OFFICE RENTON WA 98055 RENTON WA 98055 ATT: THANH NGUYEN MS47328 OLYMPIA WA 98504 9485740190IL03S0031 0087000i431L03S0031 0087000213/L03S0031 WORSHAM PAUL A YADOCK WENDY & DAVID YOST DAVID 3136 MAIN AV S 17020 104TH AV SE 17029 106TH AV SE RENTON WA 98055 RENTON WA 98055 RENTON WA 98055 9485740050/L03S0031 ZARATE JOSE MARI S+ESTRELLI 1214 S 35TH ST RENTON WA 98055 King County Department of Development and Environmental Services Land Use Services Division 900 Oakesdate Avenue Southwest Renton, Washington 98055-1219 (206) 296.6600 'ITY (206) 296-7217 Application NUMbe ): Application for Land Use - Permits Alternative formats available upon request 4 2443 . U �C.G, D,D.�.S•_ Date Received: (Sta DO NOT WRITE ABOVE THIS DIVIDER I (We) request the following permit(s) or approval(s): ❑ Building Permit ❑ Shoreline Substantial Development Permit ❑ Clearing & Grading Permit ❑ Shoreline Conditional Use Permit ❑ Temporary Use Permit ❑ Shoreline Variance ❑ Binding Site Plan ❑ Shoreline Redesignation ❑ Site Development Permit CI Zoning Variance ❑ Boundary Line Adjustment ❑ Conditional Use Permit Short Subdivision ❑ Reuse of Public Schools ❑ Formal Subdivision ❑ Special Use Permit ❑ Urban Planned Development ❑ zone Reclassification Q Plat Alteration ❑ Site Specific Comprehensive Plan Amendment ❑ Plat Vacation ❑ P-Suffix Amendment ❑ Road Variance ❑ Special District Overlay Removal ❑ Drainage Variance or Adjustment ❑ Reasonable Use Exception ❑ Right -of -Way Use Permit ❑ Public Agency & Utility Exception ❑ Shoreline Exemption ❑ Period Review for Mining Sites T� h q //9 v . being dulv sworn. state that I am the owner or (print name) officer of the corporation owning property described in the legal description filed with this application and that I have reviewed the rules and regulations of the Department of Development and Environmental Services (DDES) regarding the preparation and filing of this application and that all statements, answers and information submitted with this application are in all respects true, accurate and complete to the best of my knowledge and belief. During the review of this application, it may be necessary for DDES staff to make one or more site. visits. By signing this application form, you are giving permission for these visits. If it is rental property, the owner hereby agrees to notify tenants of possible site visits, -7e,1-1 # printed name ss� 3 /�� A 411e S� mailing address A 1AIA 1 0,eo city state zip corporation or company name - 2YO2-- telephone If applicable, state below, the name, address and telephone number of the authorized applicant for this application as shown on the Certification and Transfer of Application Status form filed with this application, name telephone Application for Land Use Permit(s) lc-app-leper Exhibjt N mailing add6ftAly4 Item No. state zip King Countyy Hearing Examiner 2111102 Page 1 of 2 h �I For Formal Subdivisions only: Name of Subdivision Registered Land Surveyor Engineer Developer i Land Surveyor's Certification 1 hereby certify that the accompanying plat has been inspected by me and conforms to all rules and regulations of the platting resolution and standards for King County, Washington Signed: Date: Name Address and Zip Telephone'Number Name Address and Zip Name Address and Zip Telephone Number Land Surveyor Seal Note: Application forms and submittal requirements are subject to revision without notice. Application for Land Use Permit(s) Ic-app-luper 2/11102 Page 2 of 2 �.if ;,..E- f� ,..�'_ CI •T_,•; rn�;•a;c.:,: .N,rr. E�..; b,._. T:TV l� � . 'xr � dp ¢:kt i r� �i•W�� tet ;#T King County Departinent of Development and Environmental Services Alternative formats availablt. Land Use Services Division upon request 900 Oakesdale Avenue Southwest Renton, Washington 98055-1219 (206) 296-6600 T 1'Y (206) 296-7217 File No. °�v }� ,� a%� E� ;yy���9i s a j� 1{if��q {{.11 �+FF I�,� {{,.. //��Ah1 A.�jj A �i[+t � ", 1 E, �•3. �ki�a{F.d- •d.,x i�. ���, �,",§ ��tn ;.�i¢ r.t•;= i•7�6 .. ,S�¢TAIISaSeC6�QI�e�Q Ueb1+Q m�Re e4C<-�, iex�1'x 4:Ii C'.8 rtlt'v:.li� E�it iiii e.2i€3�Ytkw'1r •:�:b'��ir'•b i T,nh a'e ''E. r' M� Owner's Name Street City Zip Phone Agent's Name Street City Zip Phone Address/Location of Property Size of Property No. of Lots /7063 ILS-' ,d0G "lAcre . 9 1/4 1/4 SEC TWP RGE Legal Description Tax Account No. Z7 23 5' E�%2 �5 YNI o�Lo� /d /N,GL'9 or ,ALA �s 4�^rrI f/a. S, *SAC % v % /266G6- x) AdnA7S 8 Signature Q!!!!yAuthorized Agent )a e/ {I certify that the Info' atio ro ded by me is true and correct the e I f my knowledge) ************************************DO NOT WRITE BELOW THIS LINE Date: Technician: Kroll: Zoning: Min. Lot Area Restrictions: Min. Lot Width Community Planning Area: Comprehensive Plan Designation: ShnrPlinPt- Fnv- Sensitive Areas Map No.: Landslide Floodplain Wetland Erosion Seismic Steep Slope Streams, Class: Known Unmapped Sensitive Areas: Critical Drainage Basin- SWM Variance Requested? CIP Project? Access: Proof of Access Required? Yes Row Use Permit Required? Street Road Variance Requested? CIP Project? Sensitive Area Variance Requested? _ Certificate of Water Availability Required? Certificate of Sewer Availability Required? Health Department Approval Required? SEPA Required? Proof of Legal Lot Required? Other: Short Plat Application Fish Bearing Coal Mine No (SA, 2ndG,P.B.) Ic-app-shplat FEES State Highway? Yes No Cities within 3 miles? City Utilities? Critical Corridor? Yes No _ T Bald Eagle Nest Buffer? Yes No Bald Eagle Habitat Area? Yes No Forest Dist. AG Dist. RELATED FILES: E C E � W F 0 Nov 14 z003 ®P 11/05/01 Pag . 1 of 2 k h. As a result of deeding land to a public body after April 3, 1977, and that is consistent with King County zoning code, access and board of health requirements so as to qualify as a building site pursuant to Section 8 of this ordinance; or i. By a partial fulfillment deed pursuant to a real estate contract recorded prior to October 1-, 1972, and no more than four lots were created per the deed. r-J-Plit Densit '.'and Dirrien'slon Worksh'eet- Complete applicable sections of the Subdivision Density and Dimension Calculations worksheet and turn in the completed form and two copies. ,Short:P.lat Alteratioris.; r,, . ,;':. Only the owner of the original short plat may submit a short plat alteration for the creation of additional lots. Property owners or their designated agents may submit all other short plat . aite lion requests. Itle„Reoort, "..i Submit a title report issued within 30 days of application, showing all persons having an ownership interest, a legal description describing exterior boundary of application site, and listing all encumbrances affecting the site. Ma- Pa a Minimum, p6g6'siie of 8,,,'/2°ihcheeb'.14'incKds OroVIde;5 cd"165 Provide a map prepared by a land surveyor showing the following: 1. Location of all physical and legal description encroachments affecting the boundary between the application site.and the adjoining parcels. Encroachments may be from the application site onto the adjoining parcels or from the adjoining parcels onto the application site; 2. Contours based upon topographic field survey. For land inside the urban growth boundary, contour intervals shall be at two -foot intervals when slopes are 15 percent or less and five-foot intervals for slopes exceeding 15 percent. The preliminary map shall contain notes indicating that contours are based upon field survey. A field topographic base map shall accompany the application. If approved by the department, field survey may be waived for large areas of open space or extensive sensitive area tracts. Two temporary benchmarks must be shown within the application site along with the appropriate elevation and datum; 3. A legal description of application site as shown in the title report, and the Assessor's Parcel Number(s); 4. The proposed layout of lots, tracts, right-of-way and easements, along with existing utilities and areas of proposed dedications; 5. The purpose of any tracts and dedications proposed within the application site; 6. All easements, listed in the title report, capable of being plotted on the map; 7. Field -verified survey of location of all known sensitive areas, including the required buffers, and building setback lines per K.C.C. 21A.24. Sensitive areas include, but are not limited to, streams, wetlands, and steep slopes that may affect the proposal. Show the approximate 100-year floodplain of sensitive areas, where applicable; 8. Name and address of proposal; 9. North arrow, scale, and date of map and revisions when applicable; 10. Location of adjoining parcels and buildings within 100 feet of the site shall be shown and delineated by dashed lines. The zoning of the subject parcel and adjoining property shall also be identified; 11. Name and location of all existing adjoining right-of-way along with the name and location of any adjoining or internal right-of-way proposed to be vacated with the proposal; 12. A vicinity map; 13. The name, address and phone number of the Applicant and the Owner(s); 14. An engineered preliminary drainage plan. Check out the DDES Web site at www.mehokc.aov/ddes Short Subdivision Submittal Requirements Checldlst It•chl•shortsubppdf 0WSM3 Page 2 of 4 .N61, ►' _ d (2r,p__,-tpp -A �,�i I � 4 r D D 3 pitV1 3 � Short Subdivision Submittal Requirements Checklist King County Department of Development and Environmental Services (J Land Use Services Dlvlsion Alternative formats avails e 900 oakesdaie Avenue Southwest Renton, WA 98055-1219 upon request 206-296-6600 TTY 206.296-7217 Please provide all information requested and return the original forms to this office. Incomplete applications cannot be processed. All information other than the signature should be typewritten or neatly printed. Steps Needed to Complete Application Package and Use Aeellcation Complete Application for Land Use Permits as required. Please provide signed original plus five es. Le IShort Plat A lication �emplete Short Plat Application as required. Please provide signed original plus five copies. �//Date of Se re atlon The date of segregation is the date that the total parcel was created. If created by a recorded short plat, a minimum of five years must elapse from the date of recording before a new short plat application can be submitted. A lot is considered by the Department of Development and Environmental Services to be a legal lot if it was created in compliance with applicable state and local land segregation codes in effect at the time the lot was created, including demonstrating that the lot was created: Prior to June 9, 1937, and the lot has been. a. Provided with approved sewage disposal or water systems or roads, or b. Conveyed as an individually described parcel to separate, noncontiguous' ownerships through a fee simple transfer or purchase prior to October 1, 1972; c. Recognized prior to October 1, 1972, as a separate tax lot by the county assessor. 2. Through a review and approval process recognized by the county for the creation of four lots or less from June 9, 1937, to October 1, 1972, or the subdivision process on or after June 9, 1937; 3. Through the short subdivision process on or after October 1, 1972; or 4. Through the following alternative means allowed by the state statute or King County Code: a. For the raising of agricultural crops or livestock, in parcels greater than 10 acres, between September 3, 1948; and August 11, 1969; b. For cemeteries or other burial plots, while used for that purpose, on or after August 11, 1969; c. At a size five acres or greater, recorded between August 11, 1969, and October 1, 1972, and did not contain a dedication; d. At a size 20 acres or greater, recognized prior to the effective date of this title provided, however, for remnant lots not less than 17 acres and no more than one per quarter section; e. Upon a court order entered between August 11, 1969, to July 1, 1974; f. Through testamentary provisions or the laws of descent after August 10, 1969; g. Through an assessor's plat made in accordance with RCW 58.18.010 after Au11MIA gLE Copy 10, 1969; 11 MIA out the DDES Web site at www.metrokc.sgov/ddes Short Subdivision Submittal Requirements Checkllsl k-chl-shonsub.pdf 05128M Page 1 of 4 �/ Preliminary approval for the creation of a new water system in accordance with the provisions of the applicable Coordinated Water System Plan, or for connection with a private well from the Seattle -King County Department of Public Health; or The attached form concerning water availability to the site must be given to the appropriate existing water purveyor to complete (water district; city; water association) and then returned with this application. At the top of the form, a space is provided for a description of the site. In this space, the legal description of the site should be inserted or attached on a separate sheet if it is too lengthy. Sites located in the Service Planning Area of the Urban Growth Area, that are not proposing to be served by an existing or new Group A water system at the time of construction must provide a completed Certificate of Future Connection from the appropriate Group A water Ce'rtificate1=Orl i�p hhl and two,6oples.' Preliminary approval for individual or community on -site sewage disposal systems from the Seattle -King County Department of Public Health must be submitted with this application, or the attached form concerning sewer availability to the site must be given to the appropriate agency to complete (sewer district) and then returned with this application. At the top of the form a space is provided for a description of the site. In this space, the legal description of the site should be inserted or attached on a separate sheet if it is too lengthy. NOTE: If a site is located within the Urban Growth Area, interim on -site sewage disposal Is not permitted. Prelimina d'Health De artmerit A i dval if on;Se tick.: three copies (Valid for one year from date of signature.) (Submit health department approval map, which includes test holes and identification of drain ld•areas). Level 1 Dralnage{Analysis Submit eight copies prepared by Professional Engineer (see handout) nvfronmental'Checklist°�',;4 Submit 13 copies of the checklist A short plat is subject to review under the State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA) when the lot includes "lands covered by water" (WAC 197-11-756), or the lot was short subdivided within a subdivision previously exempted under SEPA (WAC 197-500(6)(a)). FireDist'rict•Recei t = .; (must apply for short plat within 30 days of the fire district's signature) J--.'Pe6i1mIniaDL A Iication.,Fees', : ' Return completed application materials to this office to apply for your subdivision. Consult the current fee schedule for the appropriate fees to be paid at the time of application. ( Oiie?Set of. Current Assessor's Maps:showhig:",-a., 1. Property to be subdivided outlined in red. 2. Adjoining properties under the same ownership outlined in yellow. 3. All properties within 500 feet of the subdivider's ownership. 4. If assessor maps are stamped "See enlargement," the enlargement must be submitted. Check out the DDES Web site at Www.metrokc.gov_/ddes Short Subdivision Submittal Requirements Checklist toohl-shortsub.pdf 0512=3 Page 3 of 4 f liAffidavitlCertificate of SAO Compliance: Affidavit Concerning Sensitive Areas Compliance signed by owner at Department of Development and Environmental Services or notarized. �' S eclat Studies o tlonal Submit eight copies of any special studies (i.e., wetland report, geotechnical analysis, traffic study, etc.). Certificate of Trans orkation Concurrenc Submit three copies Note: Not required for short subdivisions in the Urban Growth Area. t A ' Itcarit'Statlas Forme Submit one completed copy of Certification of Applicant Status c Co les otVariance Decisions Re uired: er K.C.C. Titie'21A .71 A List of Other Issued or. Pending Permits or Decisions ' ; This category includes, but is not limited to, Road Standards Variances and Surface Water Design Manual Variances. Please note that a decision on the Short Subdivision application cannot be issued until all pending permits or decisions have been issued. Check out the DDES Web site at www.metrokc.aov/ddes Short Subdivision Submittal Requirements Checklist lc-01-shortsub.pdf OMBM Page 4 of 4 • King -County Department of Development and Environmental Services 900 Oakesdale Avenue Southwest Renton, Washington 98055-1219 206-296-6600 TTY 206-296-7217 Certification Of Applicant Status Alternative formats available upon request Permit Number: FOR INDIVIDUALS: (print name) hereby certify that I am an/the owner of the pr perty which is the subject of this application for permit or approval. If I am not the sole owner of the property, I certify that I am authorized to apply for this Permit or approval by any and all other owners of the property. My mailing address is: S S e 1 further certify that I am the "applicant" for this permit or approval and am financially rasponsible for all fees and will receive any refunds paid. I shall remain the "applicant" for the duration of this permit or approval unless I transfer my "applicant" status in writing on a form provided by this department. By being the "applicant," that individual assumes financial responsibility, for all fees and will receive refunds paid. - Signature IAp 'c t Date Signed OR FOR CORPORATIONSIBUSINESS ASSOCIATIONS: 1, , (print name) hereby certify that I am an authorized agent of , a corporation, or other business association authorized to do business in the State of Washington which is the subject of this application for permit or approval. If this business association is not the sole owner of the property, I certify that this business association is authorized to apply for the permit or approval by any and all other owners of the property. The mailing address of this business association is: I further certify that the above -named business association is the "applicant" for this permit or vpproval and is financial!y responsible for all fees and will receive any refunds paid. This association shall remain the "applicant" for the duration of this permit or approval unless it transfers its "a licant" status in writing or on a form provided by this department. 1 certify under penalty of perjury under the laws of the State of Washington that the foregoing is true and correct. Signature of Applicant Date Signed Check out the DDES Web site at www.metrokc. ov/dde Certification of Applicant Status lc-cer-apstat.pdf 05121103�i� FILE C EE V E NR91' 41003 K.C. D.D.E.S. �� NOTICE TO APPLICANTS: By law, this department returns all engineering and other plans to the applicant. If, however, you wish to authorize the department to return E'.1gineering and other plans directly to the engineer, architect, or other consultant for the li,nited purpose of making corrections, please designate below: Np I authorize this department to return plans directly to my consultant(s) for the limited purpose of making corrections as designated on this form. CONSULTANTS: Check out the DDES Web site at www.metrokc.govlddes C x1ification of Applicant Status lc-cer-apstat.pdf 05/21103 Page 2 of 2