No preview available
HomeMy WebLinkAboutFinal Agenda Packet-� CITY OF enton 0 AGENDA City Council Regular Meeting 7:00 PM - Monday, January 28, 2019 Council Chambers, 7th Floor, City Hall — 1055 S. Grady Way 1. CALL TO ORDER AND PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE 2. ROLL CALL 3. SPECIAL PRESENTATION a) Councilmember Ruth Perez Recognition by Association of Washington Cities (AWC) 4. PUBLIC HEARING a) Wolf Woods Annexation - 60% Petition & Zoning (A-17-002) S. ADMINISTRATIVE REPORT 6. AUDIENCE COMMENTS • Speakers must sign-up prior to the Council meeting. • Each speaker is allowed five minutes. • When recognized, please state your name & city of residence for the record. NOTICE to all participants: Pursuant to state law, RCW 42.17A.555, campaigning for any ballot measure or candidate in City Hall and/or during any portion of the council meeting, including the audience comment portion of the meeting, is PROHIBITED. 7. CONSENT AGENDA The following items are distributed to Councilmembers in advance for study and review, and the recommended actions will be accepted in a single motion. Any item may be removed for further discussion if requested by a Councilmember. a) Approval of Council Meeting minutes of January 14, 2019. Council Concur b) AB - 2309 Administrative Services Department submits a water leak adjustment request from Ping Lin, owner of the service address of 1531 N 3rd St, and recommends granting an adjustment in the amount of $5,004.53 for applicable water, sewer, and King County Metro charges in accordance with RMC 8-4-46 and 8-5-23. Refer to Finance Committee c) AB - 2314 Administrative Services Department submits a list of outstanding debts, and requests approval to write-off bad debt that cannot be collected in the amount of $20,278.27. Refer to Finance Committee d) AB - 2316 Administrative Services Department recommends approval to issue Limited -Tax General Obligation (LTGO) bonds generating approximately $8.5 million in project proceeds funded by a local option sales and use tax to fund public infrastructure in the South Lake Washington Revitalization Area. Refer to Finance Committee e) AB - 2308 Human Resources / Risk Management Department recommends adopting a resolution that 1) approves an administrative change to the City's deferred compensation 457(b) plan allowing members to rollover Roth contributions to the plan, and 2) authorizes the City's 457 Committee to make administrative revisions to the plan as long as they do not impact the City's budget. Council Concur f) AB - 2312 Transportation Systems Division recommends approval of an agreement with King County Metro Transit, in the amount of $126,352, for the purchase of ORCA Business Cards and ORCA Business Passport products in support of the City's Commute Trip Reduction (CTR) program. Refer to Transportation (Aviation) Committee g) AB - 2310 Transportation Systems Division recommends adoption of a Title VI Plan ensuring that the provision of benefits and services, and transportation decision making are conducted in a non-discriminatory manner. Refer to Transportation (Aviation) Committee h) AB - 2305 Transportation Systems Division submits CAG-16-049, Sunset Lane NE Improvements project, contractor Road Construction Northwest, and requests acceptance of the project after 60 days, subject to receiving all required certifications. Council Concur 8. UNFINISHED BUSINESS Topics listed below were discussed in Council committees during the past week. Those topics marked with an asterisk (*) may include legislation. Committee reports on any topics may be held by the Chair if further review is necessary. a) Planning & Development Committee: Recreation Uses in the UC Zone, Startup425 Interlocal Agreement* b) Utilities Committee: SE 172nd St. Stormwater Grant; Heather Downs Project Agreement; 16th & Jefferson Stormwater Agreement 9. LEGISLATION Resolutions: a) Resolution No. 4364: Amended 457(b) Plan (See Item 7J) b) Resolution No. 4366: Trails and Bicycle Master Plan Update (approved 111412019 via Planning & Development Committee Report) c) Resolution No. 4367: Startup 425 Interlocal Agreement (See Item 8.a) Ordinances for first reading: e) Ordinance No. 5919: Wolf Woods Annexation (A-17-002) f) Ordinance No. 5920: Wolf Woods Annexation Zoning (A-17-002) 10. NEW BUSINESS (Includes Council Committee agenda topics; visit rentonwa.gov/cityclerk for more information.) 11. ADJOURNMENT COMMITTEE OF THE WHOLE MEETING AGENDA (Preceding Council Meeting) CANCELLED Hearing assistance devices for use in the Council Chambers are available upon request to the City Clerk CITY COUNCIL MEETINGS ARE TELEVISED LIVE ON GOVERNMENT ACCESS CHANNEL 21 To view Council Meetings online, please visit rentonwa.gov/counciImeetings AWC Advanced Certificate of Municipal Leadership The Association of Washington Cities recognizes Councilmember Ruth Perez City of Renton for the successful completion of AWC's Certificate of Municipal Leadership training program. _, ASSOCIATION OF WASHINGTON 110 CiiiES Presented: 7/20/2018 e Don Britain, AWC President Proposed Annexation: Wolf Woods Zoning Public Hearing #2 January 28, 2019 ors � F1,4 .r 3I Petitioner Submits A Annexation Process 10% Petition Council Meets with � Notice of Intent to � Petitioner Boundary Review Board Council Authorizes Boundary Review Board ~ 60% Petition 45 Day Review Circulation Boundary Review Board Petitioner Submits Approval 60% Petition 2nd public Hearing for Petition Certified by Zoning King County Council Holds Public City Council Adopts Ordinance Hearing Purpose King County Boundary Review Board "Closing Letter for Completed Action" Issued November 6, 2018 The proposed annexation has been approved for final action Final action is ordinance adoption However, zoning annexation areas requires two public hearings *This is the 2"d of the two public hearings 1st was held June 24, 2018 �' ` . Kennydale Lake Washington p ti.+• � I Center 1 Hifl 1=., HighlandjFT s ne.._.., 96Ft y. .L-;Plateau Ceder- Rluir Benson a Ci Fairwood rC Ir 'Talbot >- 114 � uZ.. d Cl I NE 16rh Si, — i • 0 Is-m r\Y 0 •101.1.1O''.1• Slope City of Renton >15 <= .5° >25% & <=40° (Sensitive) .� >40% & <=90° (Protected) 0 >90 (Protected) � - f • 'k AD- E County Land Use Designation & Zoning • Urban Residential Medium • 4 — 12 Dwelling Units per Acre o R-4 zone n \ I Y 0 FNTO�J -r- L]p4m1 r 5131 2220 5301 - 5313 ! 10221 2229 2214 5307 2211 A 2208 1U22f 2219 1a2ia 2200 ! 10231 5120 2217 5326 2205 2262 ! 2122 5320 i 10241 10240 10239 2086 2472 5314 2106 1 5131 2084 ti 5321 54 i 10249 10250 1 0251+ 10224 2069 2064 5308 5504 2467 5510 19257 -64 2067 5315 ` 102 63 24$3 5302 2009 6j 1020 2060 5511 m! 760 5188.. 2054 3309 2003 5303 5501 irl 10274 10271 103:� 5565 1 �. 3 51a5 1912 1 10419 10415 10403 10404 j i0411 10403 Kesqt�tle,i CA ! #urn 1808 I 14423 Residential 10415 1 Q414 10415 190i sit' 1944 # Low ueirSI'Lr 104 1830 i 14702 10423 1825 ! 1041 1821 18261 14712 14431 1819 1822 1._.—.—._._.—._..`__._.,.� �.�s._..._.�._.�,_ _...._.�._ ^Renton M 1050. 1818 w! 1815 ! ! 1810 1807 1810 m 1815 1800 U 1806 1001 s 1804 10520 1731 v 1734 .r 1722 1732 � 17a5 1730 1727 -. 00 1753 � 10606 a Vol 1723 i718 770 1710 1 740 1723 - 1725 1 � 4 1715 1T3fi ! 10616 1722 1708 17271 a 1717 171917i1 1704 1731 MO 171H 5320 170 1725 1724 1 10624 1711 5308 5352 5358 — AMA Ah • Renton Land Use Designation & Zoning • Prezoned in 1997 Ordinance #4667 • City no longer has R-5 zoning • Zoning occurs with annexation process • 15t zoning public � hearing tonight • 2nd after BRB approval A n\1 Y o- + ~ �� Zoning Policy • Comprehensive Plan Policy LU 14 • Resource Conservation Zone (RC) — Land with significant environmental constraints, not appropriate for urban development, suitable for environmental conservation or restoration. One dwelling unit per ten acres. • Residential-1 Zone (R-1) — Land with significant environmental constraints, which may have the potential for development at an intensity that is compatible with that environment. One dwelling unit per acre. • Residential-4 (R-4) Zone —Land that is suitable for housing with large lots, compatible with the scale and density of the surrounding area. Four dwelling units per acre. —A �Fly30 Zoning Intent • R M C 4-2-020 • RC - Very low -density residential zone of land with extensive critical areas, promotes uses compatible with critical areas. It provides separation between areas of urban uses and critical areas or agricultural uses • R-1— Provides for residential use of land with pervasive critical areas where limited development will not compromise critical areas. Allows large lot and clustered single family • R-4 - Promotes single family use serviceable by utilities and containing open space amenities. Serves as a transition between rural zones and higher density residential zones. -'" Natural Features • Approximately 375 ft. of Greenes Creek runs through the site • Type Ns stream - does not contain fish or fish habitat, intermittent flows, seasonal non -habitat stream in which surface flow is not present for at least some portion of a year of normal rainfall • It is physically connected to May Creek, which is fish bearing • 50 foot buffer from the stream and an additional 15 foot structure setback beyond the buffer would be required of any future development M� • Approximately 200 ft. south is a wetland; most in protected tract — �, Y + • The category is unknown; buffer is unknown CIZ + '+e Natural Features g Zonina Proposal • There does not appear to be protected slopes (40% or greater) or other critical areas within or in close proximity to the annexation area • Presence of Type Ns stream and a wetland in close proximity do not constitute extensive or pervasive critical areas as characterized in the purpose and intent of the RC or R-1 zones • R-4 zoning is proposed ���60tj City Annexation Policies Recommendation • The Administration recommends: • Approve first reading of the Wolf Woods annexation ordinance, and • Approve first reading of the ordinance zoning the area R-4, consistent with the Residential Low Density designation L�Z yAN s �FNTc3I AGENDA ITEM #7. a) iCITY OF d- MINUTES City Council Regular Meeting 7:00 PM - Monday, January 14, 2019 Council Chambers, 7th Floor, City Hall — 1055 S. Grady Way CALL TO ORDER AND PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE Mayor Pro Tern Persson called the meeting of the Renton City Council to order at 7:00 PM and led the Pledge of Allegiance. ROLL CALL Councilmembers Present: Don Persson, Mayor Pro Tern Randy Corman Ryan Mclrvin Ruth Perez Armondo Pavone Ed Prince Carol Ann Witschi, Council President Pro Tern ADMINISTRATIVE STAFF PRESENT Robert Harrison, Chief Administrative Officer Shane Moloney, City Attorney Megan Gregor, Deputy City Clerk Cliff Long, Economic Development Director Gregg Zimmerman, Public Works Administrator Ellen Bradley-Mak, Human Resources and Risk Management Administrator Angie Mathias, Long Range Planning Manager Kim Gilman, Human Resources Labor Manager Police Chief Ed VanValey, Police Department Community Program Coordinator Cyndie Parks, Police Department Commander Dan Figaro, Police Department January 14, 2019 REGULAR COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES AGENDA ITEM #7. a) PROCLAMATION a) National Mentoring Month: A proclamation by Mayor Law was read declaring January 2019 to be National Mentoring Month in the City of Renton, in tribute to the many dedicated individuals who volunteer their time, compassion, and talents to mentor young people, encouraging all citizens to join in this special observance and to consider giving back to our community as mentors. Fawn Perkowsky, Operations Manager with Communities In Schools of Renton (CISR) accepted the proclamation with thanks. MOVED BY WITSCHI, SECONDED BY PAVONE, COUNCIL CONCUR IN THE PROCLAMATION. CARRIED. SPECIAL PRESENTATIONS a) Police: Camera Registration Program: Police Chief Ed VanValey introduced Cyndie Parks, who provided a brief presentation on a new crime prevention program that will allow residents and business owners to help solve crime and assist in lowering incidents of criminal activity, by registering external business or personal camera locations with the City of Renton. b) Police: Take Me Home Program: Cyndie Parks provided a brief presentation on the Take Me Home Program, a free location search service designed for individuals with autism, Down syndrome, developmental or cognitive disabilities, and senior citizens suffering from dementia or Alzheimer's who have gone missing. PUBLIC MEETING a) Bill Annexation (A-18-002): this being the date set and proper notices having been posted and published in accordance with local and State laws, Mayor Pro Tempore Persson opened the public meeting to consider the 10% Notice of Intent to Commence Annexation Proceedings for the proposed Bill Annexation. Long Range Planning Manager Angie Mathias reported that the proposed Bill Annexation site is at the eastern portion of City limits in the East Plateau Community Planning Area, and bordered to the north by a parcel line near SE 3rd St., at 154th Ave SE to the east, parcel lines at SE 139th Place to the south (if extended), and 152nd Ave SE to the west. She noted that the area has no regulated slopes or wetlands and streams in the immediate vicinity of the site. Ms. Mathias reported that if the site were to be annexed the fire authority, utilities, and school district would remain unchanged. Reviewing the site's zoning, Ms. Mathias stated that the area is designated in King County's Comprehensive Plan as Urban Residential Low with R-4 zoning. She reported that the City has designated the site as Residential Low Density which provides the City with the option to zone it as Resource Conservation (RC) allowing one dwelling unit per 10 acres, R-1 allowing one dwelling unit per acre, or R-4 allowing four dwelling units per acre. She specified that this site was pre -zoned in 2007 with R-4 zoning. Ms. Mathias reported that currently there are three dwellings on the site with an estimated eight residents. It is estimated there could be a total of twenty additional dwelling units with an estimated additional fifty-six residents, based on the current zoning standards. If annexed, a conservative estimate of the fiscal impacts are that there would be a 3.5% annual cost increase and a 2.5% annual revenue increase. January 14, 2019 REGULAR COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES AGENDA ITEM #7. a) Concluding, Ms. Mathias stated that a comment was received by a southern neighboring property that would also like to be included in the annexation area, and that the proponent is supportive of this addition. Additionally, the proposed annexation is generally consistent with City annexation policies and Boundary Review board objectives, and the City's best interests and general welfare would be served by this annexation. There being no public comment, it was MOVED BY PRINCE, SECONDED BY WITSCHI, COUNCIL CLOSE THE PUBLIC MEETING. CARRIED. Following Council discussion, it was MOVED BY PRINCE, SECONDED BY WITSCHI, COUNCIL AMEND THE ANNEXATION BOUNDARY AS REQUESTED AND AUTHORIZE CIRCULATION OF A 60% DIRECT PETITION TO ANNEX, SPECIFYING THAT PROPERTY OWNERS ACCEPT THE CITY'S ZONING AND ASSUME THEIR PROPORTIONAL SHARE OF THE CITY'S BONDED INDEBTEDNESS. CARRIED. ADMINISTRATIVE REPORT Chief Administrative Officer Robert Harrison reviewed a written administrative report summarizing the City's recent progress towards goals and work programs adopted as part of its business plan for 2019 and beyond. Items noted were: • The mayor's annual State of the City address is January 30 at 8:00 a.m. at Renton Pavilion Event Center. Tickets are $25 each or $200 for a table of 8 and can be purchased by calling 425-430-6616. AUDIENCE COMMENTS The following individuals spoke to Council regarding their concerns about the denial of grant funding for RenCon, a Renton City Comic Con, from the Lodging Tax Advisory Committee (LTAC) grants: • Andrew Bramund, Renton • Brian Morris, Renton • Jennifer Skelton, Kent • Sara Servin, Renton • Benjamin Andrews, Renton • Rose Skelton, Kent • Sam Granquist, Seattle • Abie Ekenezar, Burien • Emilio Morales, Bellevue • Rachael Furlong, Renton • Amdr Fakharzadeh, Kent, shared his feelings concerning the proposal to implement a RIO (Residential Inspection Ordinance). He remarked that his family owns multiple affordable housing properties in Renton, and that his concern is that an ordinance like this would initiate even more regulations which could, in turn, make it harder for smaller property landlords to keep and maintain rentals within Renton. January 14, 2019 REGULAR COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES AGENDA ITEM #7. a) • Patience Malaba, Renton, advocacy manager at the Housing Development Consortium of Seattle and King County expressed support regarding the implementation of a Rental Inspection Licensing ordinance. CONSENT AGENDA Items listed on the Agenda were adopted with one motion, following the listing. a) Approval of Council Meeting minutes of January 7, 2019. Council Concur. b) AB - 2298 City Clerk submitted King County Boundary Review Board Closing Letter regarding the proposed Wolf Woods Annexation, and recommended a public hearing be set on January 28, 2019 to consider finalizing the annexation and zoning for the proposed annexation. Council Concur; Set Public Hearing on 01/28/2019. c) AB - 2302 Community & Economic Development Department recommended approval of an interlocal agreement between the cities of Bellevue, Issaquah, Kirkland, Redmond, and Renton that formalizes the cooperative effort to support a robust entrepreneur and small business ecosystem on the Eastside, known as Startup 425, in the amount of $15,000 annually for 2019 and 2020. Refer to Planning & Development Committee. d) AB - 2294 Community & Economic Development Department requested setting a public hearing on February 4, 2019 to consider 1) authorizing the execution of Washington State Department of Transportation (WSDOT) documents for a Temporary Easement and Warranty Deed required as part of WSDOT's 1-405 & NE 44th St Interchange (Exit 7) project with compensation set at $20,000; and 2) authorize the disbursement of funds in the amount of $10,000 to King County as required repayment of grant funds for the King County Conservation Futures Levy. Refer to Transportation (Aviation) Committee; Set Public Hearing on 2/4/2019. e) AB - 2304 Community & Economic Development Department recommended establishing a work program to consider allowing outdoor recreation as part of mixed use projects in the Urban Center (UC) zone. Refer to Planning Commission and Planning & Development Committee. f) AB - 2288 Human Resources / Risk Management Department recommended approval of the 2019-2020 Renton Police Guild Commissioned Employees' contract, pending guild ratification of the contract. Council Concur. g) AB - 2303 Utility Systems Division submitted the Kennydale Lakeline Sewer Improvement Phase II project, CAG-18-110, with Ballard Marine Construction, LLC, and recommended acceptance of the project, and requested authorization to release the retainage bond after 60 days, once all required releases have been obtained. Council Concur. MOVED BY WITSCHI, SECONDED BY PRINCE, COUNCIL CONCUR TO APPROVE THE CONSENT AGENDA, AS PRESENTED. CARRIED. UNFINISHED BUSINESS a) Committee of the Whole Chair Persson presented a report concurring in the staff recommendation to approve the agreement for services between the Owner (City of Renton) and Architect (Baylis Architects) for $1,239,097.05 for the Family First Community Center. MOVED BY WITSCHI, SECONDED BY PRINCE, COUNCIL CONCUR IN THE COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATION. CARRIED. January 14, 2019 REGULAR COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES AGENDA ITEM #7. a) b) Committee of the Whole Chair Persson presented a report concurring in the staff recommendation to approve allocations for the 2019 Lodging Tax Fund as recommended by the Lodging Tax Advisory Committee as follows: • Renton Chamber of Commerce, Operation of Tourism Organization: $100,000 • City of Renton, Renton Community Marketing: $75,000 • International Assoc of Firefighters Local 864, 2019 Convention: $50,000 • Seattle TISI Sangam, Sangam Convention 2019: $30,000 • LTAC selected Community event sponsorships: $20,000 • Ravishing Women, Ravishing Women's Show: $15,000 • REEL Renton, Seattle Film Summit: $15,000 • City of Renton, Multicultural Festival: $10,000 • Coalition of Filipino American, Philippine Independence Day: $10,000 • NW Premier Jr. Football & Cheer, All Star weekend & Jamboree: $7,500 • City of Renton, Cruz the Loop: $5,000 • Renton Downtown Partnership, Wine Walks and Ladies Night: $5,000 Total Recommendation: $342,500 The Committee further recommended authorization for the Mayor and City Clerk to execute contracts with the successful applicants to expend budgeted funds on the proposed additional marketing initiatives. MOVED BY WITSCHI, SECONDED BY PRINCE, COUNCIL CONCUR IN THE COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATION. CARRIED. c) Finance Committee Chair Pavone presented a report concurring in the staff recommendation to enter into a Professional Services Agreement with MIG, Inc. to complete the six -year update to the Parks, Recreation and Natural Areas Plan, in the amount of $206,993 and be funded from the Capital Improvement Fund (Fund 316).The Committee recommended that the Mayor and City Clerk be authorized to execute the Agreement. MOVED BY PAVONE, SECONDED BY PRINCE, COUNCIL CONCUR IN THE COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATION. CARRIED. d) Finance Committee Chair Pavone presented a report concurring in the staff recommendation to approve the 2019 contract agreement with Davey Resource Group, Inc. in the amount of $139,360 for a Consulting Certified Arborist Inspector to assist with the Community Services Department - Urban Forestry Program tree requests' for service. MOVED BY PAVONE, SECONDED BY WITSCHI, COUNCIL CONCUR IN THE COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATION. CARRIED. e) Finance Committee Chair Pavone presented a report concurring in the staff recommendation to authorize the Community Services Department, Recreation and Neighborhood Division to increase the current 0.50 FTE Recreation Specialist focused on youth athletics, to 0.75 FTE. MOVED BY PAVONE, SECONDED BY PRINCE, COUNCIL CONCUR IN THE COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATION. CARRIED. f) Finance Committee Chair Pavone presented a report concurring in the staff recommendation to approve the King County Grant Agreement (Project #1134841/Contract #6032102 for $55,000 and King County Grant Agreement Project (#1134134/Contract 6024530) for $20,000 for the construction and installation of the Family First Community Center. January 14, 2019 REGULAR COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES AGENDA ITEM #7. a) MOVED BY PAVONE, SECONDED BY PRINCE, COUNCIL CONCUR IN THE COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATION. CARRIED. g) Finance Committee Chair Pavone presented a report concurring in the staff recommendation to approve the State of Washington Transportation Improvement Board Fuel Tax Grant Agreement for $500,000 for the Duvall Avenue NE Roadway Improvements Project, NE 9th Street to NE 10th Street. MOVED BY PAVONE, SECONDED BY PRINCE, COUNCIL CONCUR IN THE COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATION. CARRIED. h) Planning and Development Committee Chair Prince presented a report concurring with the staff and Planning Commission recommendation to amend the regulations regarding recreational uses in mixed use projects in the Urban Center zone be prepared and presented for first reading when it is complete. MOVED BY PRINCE, SECONDED BY PAVONE, COUNCIL CONCUR IN THE COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATION. CARRIED. NEW BUSINESS Please see the attached Council Committee Meeting Calendar. ADJOURNMENT MOVED BY PRINCE, SECONDED BY PAVONE, COUNCIL ADJOURN. CARRIED. TIME: 8:33 P.M. Jason A. Seth, CIVIC, City Clerk Megan Gregor, CIVIC, Recorder Monday, January 14, 2019 January 14, 2019 REGULAR COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES AGENDA ITEM #7. a) Council Committee Meeting Calendar January 14, 2019 January 21, 2019 NO MEETINGS Martin Luther King Holiday January 28, 2019 5:00 PM Planning & Development Committee, Chair Prince - Council Conference Room 1 . Recreation Uses in the UC Zone 2. Emerging Issues in CED 3. 2019 CED Work Program 4. Shoreline Master Plan Update 5. Startup425 Interlocal Agreement 6:00 PM Utilities Committee, Chair Perez - Council Conference Room 1. SE 1 72nd St. Stormwater Grant 2. Heather Downs Project Agreement 3. 16th & Jefferson Stormwater Agreement 4. Emerging Issues in Utilities CANCELLED Committee of the Whole, Vice Chair Witschi AGENDA ITEM #7. b) AB - 2309 C[TY OF -----wwwo�Renton uOo�" SUBJECT/TITLE: RECOMMENDED ACTION DEPARTMENT: STAFF CONTACT: EXT.: None Utility Leak Adjustment Refer to Finance Committee Administrative Services Department Kari Roller, Financial Services Manager X6931 The Finance Department received a request for a leak adjustment from Ping Lin, the owner of a multi -family housing at the service address of 1531 N 3rd St. This account receives water and sewer from the City as well as King County Metro services. The water leak was located in the main line water servicing the building and was identified sometime during September 2018 and the repairs were made 10/9/2018. A leak adjustment request was submitted October 2018. The requested adjustment covers the billing period of August and September 2018 and breaks down as follows: Water $ 754.23 Sewer $1,545.15 Metro $2,705.15 Total $5,004.53 A. Water Leak Adjustment Staff recommends an adjustment to this account in the amounts of $5,004.53 for the applicable water, sewer, and King County Metro portions of the bills in accordance with City Code 8-4-46 and 8-5-23. Leak Adjustment Calculation - Residential*, Duplex, MTF *Residential - Water Eligible Only Service Address: Account Type: Account # 1531 N 3RD ST MTF 47005 WATER (up to 50% eligible) Excess Month Billed Prior Year 1 Prior Year 2 Average Consumption Water Eligible TIER 1 TIER2 TIERS SEWER KC SEWER Sep-18 294 12 11 11.5 282.5 1 141.25 1 282.5 282.5 Rate per 100 ccf 3.29 3.411 4.30 3.37 5.90 Refund Formula Refund Amount 464.71 464.71 - - 952.03 1,666.75 Oct-18 189 15 11 13 176 1 88 176.00 176.00 Rate per 100 ccf Refund Formula Refund Amount 3.29 3.41 4.30 3.37 5.90 289.52 $ - 289.52 - 593.12 1.038.40 Adjustment Total: Water I Sewer I KC Sewer I Total: $ 754.23 $ 1,545.15 $ 2,705.15 $ 5,004.53 E Mettlin AGENDA ITEM #7. b) Tipnsaction Date I Post Date/Time I Tran Type I Adjustment Type I Total I, Batch; I Receipt Nc 10/30/2018 10/29/2018 4:07:3... Balance S5,204.18 OOOD3.10.2018 ODDOO L 10/30/2019 1.0/29/2018 4 07:2... Billing S2,432.81 00003.10.2018 DOOM Service I Rate Code I Tax Code I Fee Code I Detail Code I Amount I Budgeted Storm Drainage 345 Flat S36.76Ell • Water 113M Consumption S621.81 E' Water 113M Flat S17 6O L, fJ--.:CRyWastewater 207 Consumption S611.66 C' Level Cons GenurnpG 0 7.50 . 1 181.5D City Wastewater 207 Flat $29 91 (] _KC Wastewater 402 Consumption S1,070 85 Level I Consumption 0 7.50 1 181.50 PmLuiy/L nail Drag a column header here to group 6y that column. Transaction Date I.Post.Date/Tme - I Tran Type I Adjustment Type ( Total I Batch I Receipt Nc J 10/30/2018 10/29/2018 4:07:3... Balance S5.204.18 00003.10.2018 OM... r1Q130/2018 ..: ............. .................................. ........................ 1D/29/2018'4- ............................ Bing f$2.432c81 00003102018 .......................................................................... ......... - J 10/19/2018 10/19/201812:42:... Adjustment UC SO DO 40854.10.2018 00000 10/18/2018 10/19/2018 11:15: ... Adjustment RP (S330.24) 00618.10.2018 ODDDC UI J ; 10/16/2018 10/17/2018 8:44:5... Payment (S650 00) OD81610.2018 D0150 ' . 9/30/2018 9/28/241812:23:2... Balance S3,751.61 40DD3.09.2018 DOOM 9/30/2D18 9/28/201,812.23.1. Billing S3,751.61 OD003.09.2018 DOOM Service I, Rate Code I Tax Code I Fee Code I Detail Code I Amount I Budgeted Stone Drainage 305 Flat S36.76 L+ • Water 113M Consumption S967.26 Water 113M Flat $17.60FU (J City Wastewater 207 Consumption S%5.51 r Level ` I Consumption 0 7.50 1 286 50 City Wastewater 207 Flat S29.91 FP KC Wastewater 402 Flat S44.22FEI KC Wastewater 402 Consumption S1.690.35 Ci Level I CDnsurnption 0 7.50 1 286!50 Leak Adjustment Information By comaparison periods -Prior 2 years 1531 N 3RD ST 47005 0 LIN 010028 47005 19 1 1 1 113M I CONSUMPTION 2 1207 1 CONSUMPTION 4 1 402 1 CONSUMPTION 10 1 1 1 113M I CONSUMPTION Total Total 2 1207 1 CONSUMPTION 4 1 402 1 CONSUMPTION Billed Consumption Amounts and Consumption 2016 2017 2018 $36.19 $39.48 $967.26 11 12 294 $0.00 $14.58 $965.51 0 12 294 $0.00 $26.55 $1690.35 0 12 294 $36.19 $49.35 $621.81 11 15 189 $24.30 $611.66 $0.00 0 15 189 $0.00 $44.25 $1070.85 0 15 189 72 199 5927 22 81 1449 $ 72.00 $ 199.00 $ 5927.00 22 81 1449 Utility Rates 010028 47005-0 cons M rat%cf 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 Water 113M 3/4" MTF 1 .00 minimum 16.76 17.60 17.60 17.60 0.00 17.60 rate 3.13 3.29 3.29 3.29 0.00 3.29 Renton 207 MF/Comm/monthly 1 7.50 minimum 26.33 27.65 27.65 27.65 28.76 29.91 Sewer rate 2.97 3.12 3.12 3.12 3.24 3.37 7.50 minimum 40.95 40.95 42.61 42.61 44.22 44.22 KC Sewer 402 MF/Comm/monthly 1 rate 5.46 5.46 5.68 5.68 5.90 5.90 Leak Letters cust no cust sequence code request date req description 47005 0 4 INMJ 03-October-2018 Investigate Major Leak -now r 47005 0 4AMR 05-September-2018 LETTER -AMR Major Leak 47005 0 4 INMJ 04-September-2018 Investigate Major Leak-runnii 47005 0 4 STCK 06-June-2016 Stuck Meter?/Repair or Repl; 47005 0 4NCDR 06-May-2013 Encoder/loose con/cut wire AGENDA ITEM #7. b) CITY OF `Renton Waler Me liftimeW Requeg Form Date: ' 9 /4/-tk y City Account Number �"�— Ood n Service Address: % �� � �jG' . Wp Billing Period: J-/ � l l /;E ^ 9 l ? V/% d" Location Type: Single Family Residential - Vj Non -Residential - ❑ Leak Adjustment Policy (Ordinance 5600, 6-15-2011) ❑ The City will process and grant no more than one water billing adjustment for water leaks on the customers' side of the water meter per water service connection every five (5) years. Adjustments will be calculated over the billing periods when the water leak occurred, up to a maximum of two (2) regular meter reading cycles. Leak adjustments will be granted for service tines only between the meter and the foundation of the building. ❑ A written request for a water billing adjustment must be submitted to Utility Billing Customer Service within sixty (60) days of discovery of the water leak and/or sixty (60) days of receipt of a notice from the City regarding high water consumption and that a leak might have occurred. The written request must include the service address, billing periods over which the leak occurred, location of the leak and a copy of the repair receipt with a clear written description of the completed repair. Photos verifying the repair and the location of the leak are strongly recommended. Adjustment Methodology (Ordinance 5210, 6-5-06) L' The water portion of the bill will be adjusted by charging for only 50% of the excess consumption charge over the billing period(s) when the leak occurred Example of an adjusted water billing calculation: (0.50 X Consumption in excess of historical average for billing period) X Commodity Rate. Adjustments greater than $2,000 shall be submitted to the Finance Committee for approval or denial. There will be no adjustment of the Basic Monthly Charge or any other water charge. (Ord. 5210, 6-5-2006) ❑ For non-residential sewer accounts, a full adjustment of the sewer bill will be made for all leaked water that did not enter the sanitary sewer system. The adjustment will be determined by averaging normal water consumption from previous representative billing periods and charging wastewater volume rates based on this normal average volume. Adjustments greater than $2,000 shall be submitted to the Finance Committee for approval or denial. There will be no adjustment of the base charge or any other sewer charge. Date Leak was repaired: Location Type of �+ !` Leak Repaired By:__ L? et- ? o 1. -' P1 R, , 64 Property Owner Name:�L- 1 Contact Phone#: k0A qV - Property Owner Signature Date:/AL/-�-f Note. Attach repair receipts to this request form. A4asonent will not be processed without proof of repaiin Approved ❑ Denied ❑ Reason 10SSS GRADYWAY, RENTON WA 98057 PHONE. (425)-430-6852 FAX t425}430-68Z-ORD. 5658412312012 �7 Puget Sound Olumbing & Heating 11803 Des Moines Memorial Dr (206) 938-3219 Seattle, Washington 98168 dispatch@psph.biz roeA G DA g" # 7. b) T#6MM IF MAM MMMM PLUMING AND HONOR sound 5olutlon to ynur plumbina oroblens Service Address Billing Address Invoice# JOC46375 Ping Lin Ping Lin Service Date: 10109/1806:21 47 P+A ping.iin122ralyahoo.com ping.iin i 22 syahoo.com Technician: Cole Josh 1531 N 3rd St 15."i1 \ 3rd St Penton, Washington 98055 Renton, Washington 98055 q7Y task# Description Standard Rate 1 1 T.5O031 O Water Leak Rebuild in Ground Up To 2" Pipe 630.18 ,f: ,' Up To 1 Ft and 3 FT Deep Under Ground Good solution for water leak n underground is to rebjild the failed section. Does not inciude excavation f80OD12 Demo Digging Soft Soil 412.50 .� Topsoil or Sandy Soil Digging takes time so makinq sure it Is done efficiently is our goal Note 180 day warranty on mainline repairs. No warranty on existing piping. Recommend updating whole water service mainline. Invoice Totals Amount Standard Rate $1042.68 Tax 104.27 Invoice Amount $1146.95 Amount Due $0.00 Payments Da'e T pe Dmah Amount Applied ��IrYTr�kIr�lirl:I;Ju1 Card 8697 Total Payments Diagnosis Signature Approval Signature 01146.95 $1146.95 Acceptance Signature AGENDA ITEM #7. c) AB - 2314 C[TY OF -----wwwo�Renton uOo�" SUBJECT/TITLE: RECOMMENDED ACTION DEPARTMENT: STAFF CONTACT: EXT.: Bad Debt Write Off Refer to Finance Committee Administrative Services Department Kari Roller, Financial Services Manager x6931 The total value of debt submitted for write off is $20,278.27 As per City Policy & Procedure 220-03, the City Council's Finance Committee can recommend writing off bad debt over $100.00 that has been deemed uncollectable from the City's accounting records after approval. A detailed list of each account follows this memorandum. The total value of debt submitted for write off is $20,278.27. Finance staff reviews the outstanding debt and then turns these debts over to a collection agency. Periodically, finance staff reviews the uncollected outstanding debts with the collection agency to identify debts that cannot be collected for a variety of reasons. In the case of the attached report, the debt relates to utility billing customers who have filed bankruptcy. MR Approve the listed debts to be written off City's accounting records in the amount of $20,278.27. AGEN ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES M E M O R A N D U M DATE: January 17, 2019 TO: Don Persson, Council President Members of Renton City Council FROM: Jan Hawn, Administrative Services Administrator STAFF CONTACT: Kari Roller, Financial Services Manager SUBJECT: Bad Debt Write Off According to City Policy & Procedure 220-03, the City Council's Finance Committee can recommend writing off of bad debt over $100.00 that has been deemed uncollectable from the City's accounting records after approval. A detailed list of each account follows this memorandum. The total value of debt submitted for write off is $20,278.27 Finance staff reviews the outstanding debt and makes an attempt to locate the resident/business and collect payment. If unsuccessful the debt is turned over to a collection agency. After 12 months, Finance staff reviews the uncollected outstanding debts with the collection agency to identify debts that cannot be collected. In the case of the attached report, the debt relates to customers whose debt remains uncollectable based on the business closing, bankruptcy filed, or unable to locate the customer. Per policy 220-03 the debt held at the collection agency and still outstanding after one year should be written off. Finance staff requests the Council's approval to write off the listed debts from the City's accounting records. Cc: Robert Harrison, Chief Administrative Officer Jamie Thomas, Fiscal Services Director Jen Becht, Financial Services Supervisor #7. c) AGENDA ITEM #7. c) v .N ov Q� v� r@ v v 1n C L L O 0 a Z lu c Y CC v a 7h^ v0) vvu wv a; CU ar a a a, a w o u u u o cYa m mo U o0 o -0 o 0U O O O O O O O N O W C1 N aJ w a) aJ Qj c a c c a -0c a a a c v w M > j c c fO ro ro - 0 m m m R m m O Z) m 0 O m U O Z) H a,)a� w ai u LU Z Z Z ar ar v ai F- Ln Ln Ln V) Ln Ln .T. Z � Z: Y a C C C C C C C LU t 7 E 7 E t+ u 7 E 7 E 7 7 7 p a) v o a E E a) o o c E a E a, `- E E E E E E v IL LL a U U LL a LL U Il LL U D_ U U U Q Y al Y w Y Y V Z c Q W O N rz a � aj n O U N ra ro Qj c m v w ai aui U c c y c w L V (/i a a) m i O al J D 0 a a ULU N y Q y N _0 C (U C N L y ai L w L N aJ LU c 3 � 3 0 � U v LL E O aJ W C O m U C 7 C 7 C W c W m w y Y U w w 7 CL 7 m Z aJ J 0 Z F w d a1 E J C LL LL t LL.1 J LL t' 2 O LL LL al al O 0. J a-i d U Y rn m a E Q K $ $ rn $ S S S Ln o S S $ S o S O O m^ 00 e-I n p m N tD N Ln 01 O m N m l0 V1 QOl m N m -4- Cl)ti N 1 .�-I W U W 0) O "i m N .� 0) .--I .� N .� N .� N .� m ti m .� N .� N .� Ol N .-� -1 .� 0 - 0 0 8 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 8 aQ N \ O N \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ 0 \ 0 \ Z N O N \ \ M '-I N V Ln LO O In m O O m LD rcl rr LO O O m .--I m 00 L! \\ m m r, m V r\ <D n O \N m1-4 O N Ln O o O O O O O .--I O LLJ 00 01 N 0 W Z O rn O LLD W N N r. O N M U co 06 m m O Ol V r- V m D Ul N LO LD m -4 V Ol O r, m O M .-I O1 N W Ln Ln Ln m Ln m t\ O1 Ln LD Z N O V M V 00 m N N O " N Ql m l0 LD Ol n m 00 0) N m m N lD 0) m 0000 O LNf7 N N m m m rl N N N N M M N N .--I m N Ln ~w U W a H Z z � Ln z w u " Luj w z Z a ~ a > O W 2 o p a a a U W Y o o u a = Y In J Z QF U_ I- U� G w Z J J In Q d O Q N a Y O J Q` � > O- a p 3 a 3 3 0 cca o o O o W o O - o a m a 0_ v '-1 2 2 ] W a W O a a a m m m U u U QN W 2 W O m F Z Ln Ol Vl (n .-I N O1 rV N r\ Ln LD r\ m 0) m U lD w N Ln n N N N N fV r\ V m 1-1 m O m Ol LD m N N m It C m N m n V LO � n V 01 m r\ m O7 m r, V m t\ V m V AGENDA ITEM #7. c) m N L V VI 4J a C N 7 L O. al N al a1 aJ ` al al a) N al W y W V O u u u Y O O V O u U O p V 0 p Q m -0V u Q u p O u u O O o N o 0 0 - - o N o 0 o u v ai ai w — v ai v ar w v ar ai c @ m u c c c c a c C j C c C N j 0 C j C C j C j 00 u CO m m 7 co D m u u u u u u u u u ai VI a, V) w VI a, VI aj VI w VI a Ln w V) w N C C C C C C C C C 7 cu 7 7 7 7 ai 7 E 7 E 7 E 7 E E m E E E E ca u 0 c 0 0 0 0 E o o o o 0 u LL u u u u 11 LL u LL u u LL u 1 o ai 00 c � 0 C c o y o_ n 0 o a a n aE, c c `m oN o -Q c c ai ai a0i aaj aO ai w E a, E LL ai r w ac a) c N E O O w O O ii 0 'a+ yQj 0 ` 0 f0 O70 w L u 7 u C •7 a a a a)a N u n) u u V ~O W W aJ N al O J — a/ LL O N N Q O_ it LL E Fom ai Y u w w oj LL L 7 7 m m C c O la N w m u Q1 7 a0 0) V o w w o w E o u 8 VI oC ac � o Ln J ai CC m N a CL N w �0 0 N w J o a o m g S N $ o 0 S S S S S $ S 0 0) n o N o n v o 0 0 0 o n S m Ln O Ln n I,v + v Ln Ln v v ry v W m m m i n N m m N m 00 O O N N m CT) N N O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O N \ O fV \ N \ N \ N \ N \ N \ N \ N \ N \ N 00 N \ N \ N \ N \ c-I N N N m V1 N n a-i N N O .--I .--1 .--1 N N N N 00 N r4 N n O 0 l0 .-i \ O \ m \ n \ O 00 00 \ N \ C' \ m \ Ql \ V) \ O1 \ O1 \ n \ O \ m .-I O O .-1 O .-i O O O O O O O -1 O Ln CY) Ln a 00Ln O CD n N Ln Ln N m N N ti ail N 025 02 oa n cn N m NNn O O t O OlO V) n 00 00 00 m O Ln N V 00 m nO N N n 00 V) m Ol n V 00 O 00 m m N N m N N N N N N m .-1 m N C J u w w Z J Z a V) Y O _ u a w w 0 o C 0 s a 0 w m } ~ w a H z `^ O O a Z N zce O O Q Y V)i a a B C - 0 a g a w r 0 z r- w a o 0 0 0 Ln g 3 z 0 u o LLa i i = o z J ao o a , 0va u a ~ H > Oa F- m v 02S to 00 i m O V1 0 10 00 00 n m 0) n 00 m -1 �o Ln n N Lo o 00 m am -1 Ln m Lnrn m -q v 00 n w w V' R -It V 'cF V N rcf d' m "t a m C V AGENDA ITEM #7. d) AB - 2316 C[TY OF -----wwwo�Renton uOo�" SUBJECT/TITLE: RECOMMENDED ACTION DEPARTMENT: STAFF CONTACT: EXT.: Issuance of Local Revitalization Financing LTGO Bonds Refer to Finance Committee Administrative Services Department Jan Hawn, Administrative Services Administrator 6858 Debt service payments are funded by a credit against the State's portion of the local sales and use tax revenue generated within the revitalization area. The City Council approved Ordinance 5481 creating the South Lake Washington Revitalization Area on August 17, 2009. Staff submitted an application to the Washington State Department of Revenue and was approved for State funding through the Local Revitalization Financing program (LRF). The City requested the maximum annual state contribution of $500,000 for a period of not to exceed 25 years to assist in the funding for public infrastructure improvements. The primary stipulation to receiving the LRF funds, is that the City must prove that the revitalization area has generated incremental local sales and property tax revenue equal to or greater than the State's contribution to the City. The amount generated is cumulative and since the 2010 base reporting year, the RA has generated $13.7 million in incremental sales tax revenue through December 31, 2018. A. I P B. Ordinance Approve the issuance of LTGO bonds generating approximately $8.5 million in project proceeds funded by a local option sales and use tax to fund public infrastructure improvement South Lake Washington Revitalization Area. The bond ordinance will be presented for first reading on February 4, 2019 following a discussion with the Finance Committee that same evening and second reading and adoption on February 11, 2019. AGENDA ITEM #7. d) ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES M E M O R A N D U M DATE: January 24, 2019 TO: Don Persson, Council President Members of Renton City Council VIA: Denis Law, Mayor FROM: Jan Hawn, Administrative Services Administrator STAFF CONTACT: Jan Hawn, 6858 SUBJECT: Issuance of Local Revitalization Financing LTGO Bonds ISSUE Should the City issue Limited Tax General Obligation (LTGO) bonds generating approximately $8.5 million in project proceeds to fund public improvements in the South Lake Washington Revitalization Area funded by a local option sales and use tax? RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends approval of the issuance of LTGO bonds generating approximately $8.5 million in project proceeds funded by a local option sales and use tax to fund public infrastructure improvements. BACKGROUND In 2009 the Legislature adopted the Washington Community Revitalization Financing Act. Part of this program was the establishment of Local Revitalization Financing (LRF) which allowed for cities to establish revitalization areas (RAs). By doing so, cities could levy a credit against the State's portion of the local sales and use tax revenue generated in the RA. This levy can be used to fund public infrastructure including main thoroughfares, trail improvements, utility upgrades, and high -capacity bus rapid transit facilities located within the RA. The City Council approved Ordinance 5481 creating the South Lake Washington Revitalization Area on August 17, 2009. Staff submitted an application to the Washington State Department of Revenue and was approved for State funding through the Local Revitalization Financing program (LRF). The City requested the maximum annual state contribution of $500,000 for a period of not to exceed 25 years to assist in the funding for public infrastructure improvements. AGENDA ITEM #7. d) Ed Prince, Council President Members of Renton City Council Page 2 of 2 October 12, 2018 The primary stipulation to receiving the LRF funds, is that the City must prove that the revitalization area has generated incremental local sales and property tax revenue equal to or greater than the State's contribution to the City. The amount generated is cumulative and since the 2010 base reporting year, the RA has generated $13.7 million in incremental sales tax revenue through December 31, 2018. CONCLUSION Staff recommends the Council approve the issuance of LTGO bonds generating approximately $8.5 million in project proceeds funded by a local option sales and use tax to fund public infrastructure improvement South Lake Washington Revitalization Area. The bond ordinance will be presented for first reading on February 4, 2019 following a discussion with the Finance Committee that same evening and second reading and adoption on February 11, 2019. AGENDA ITEM #7. d) CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON LIMITED TAX GENERAL OBLIGATION BONDS ORDINANCE NO. AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON, AUTHORIZING THE ISSUANCE OF ONE OR MORE SERIES OF LIMITED TAX GENERAL OBLIGATION BONDS IN THE AGGREGATE PRINCIPAL AMOUNT OF NOT TO EXCEED $8,500,000 TO FINANCE COSTS RELATED TO PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS WITHIN THE CITY'S DESIGNATED LOCAL REVITALIZATION AREA AND TO PAY COSTS OF ISSUING THE BONDS; PROVIDING THE FORM, TERMS AND COVENANTS OF THE BONDS; DELEGATING AUTHORITY TO APPROVE THE FINAL TERMS OF THE BONDS; AND PROVIDING FOR OTHER MATTERS RELATING THERETO. PASSED FEBRUARY 11, 2019 PREPARED BY: PACIFICA LAW GROUP LLP Seattle, Washington 10018 00013 b0ft42ck AGENDA ITEM #7. d) CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON ORDINANCE NO. TABLE OF CONTENTS* Page Section1. Definitions................................................................................................................2 Section 2. Authorization of the Improvements........................................................................7 Section 3. Authorization and Description of Bonds.................................................................7 Section 4. Registration, Exchange and Payments....................................................................8 Section 5. Redemption Prior to Maturity and Purchase of Bonds.........................................13 Section6. Form of Bonds........................................................................................................18 Section7. Execution of Bonds................................................................................................18 Section 8. Application of Bond Proceeds; Project Fund.........................................................19 Section9. Tax Covenants........................................................................................................19 Section 10. Debt Service Fund and Provision for Tax Levy Payments.....................................21 Section11. Defeasance.............................................................................................................23 Section12. Sale of Bonds..........................................................................................................24 Section 13. Preliminary and Final Official Statements.............................................................26 Section 14. Undertaking to Provide Ongoing Disclosure.........................................................27 Section 15. Lost, Stolen or Destroyed Bonds...........................................................................27 Section 16. Severability; Ratification........................................................................................27 Section 17. Payments Due on Business Days...........................................................................28 Section 18. Corrections by City Clerk........................................................................................28 Section19. Effective Date.........................................................................................................28 Exhibit A: Form of Bond * This Table of Contents is provided for convenience only and is not a part of this ordinance. -1- 10018 00013 b0ft42ck 01 /22/ 19 AGENDA ITEM #7. d) CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON ORDINANCE NO. AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON, AUTHORIZING THE ISSUANCE OF ONE OR MORE SERIES OF LIMITED TAX GENERAL OBLIGATION BONDS IN THE AGGREGATE PRINCIPAL AMOUNT OF NOT TO EXCEED $8,500,000 TO FINANCE COSTS RELATED TO PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS WITHIN THE CITY'S DESIGNATED LOCAL REVITALIZATION AREA AND TO PAY COSTS OF ISSUING THE BONDS; PROVIDING THE FORM, TERMS AND COVENANTS OF THE BONDS; DELEGATING AUTHORITY TO APPROVE THE FINAL TERMS OF THE BONDS; AND PROVIDING FOR OTHER MATTERS RELATING THERETO. WHEREAS, pursuant to Ordinance No. 5481, passed by the City Council (the "Council") of the City of Renton, Washington (the "City"), on August 17, 2009, the City designated certain property, located within the City and identified as a "local revitalization area" within the meaning of chapter 39.104 RCW, as the South Lake Washington Revitalization Area (the "Revitalization Area") and specified certain proposed public improvements meeting the requirements of RCW 39.104.020 to be made therein (the "Improvements"); and WHEREAS, pursuant to chapter 39.104 RCW, the City is authorized to undertake a "local revitalization financing" within the meaning of chapter 39.104 RCW by using revenues received from a local option sales and use tax imposed pursuant to RCW 82.14.510 to pay the principal of and interest on bonds issued to finance such Improvements; and WHEREAS, pursuant to RCW 82.14.505 and RCW 82.14.510, the City has or will levy and imposed a local option sales and use tax (the "Local Option Sales and Use Tax") to generate revenues for such purposes in an aggregate annual amount of approximately $500,000 (the "Local Option Sales and Use Tax Revenue"); and AGENDA ITEM #7. d) WHEREAS, after due consideration the Council has determined that it is in the best interest of the City to authorize the issuance and sale of limited tax general obligation bonds to pay a portion of the costs of the Improvements; and WHEREAS, this Council wishes to delegate authority to the Mayor, the Chief Administrative Officer and the Administrative Services Administrator of the City (as further described herein, each a "Designated Representative"), for a limited time, to approve the interest rates, maturity dates, redemption terms and other terms of the Bonds within the parameters set by this ordinance; NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON DO ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. Definitions. As used in this ordinance, the following words and terms shall have the following meanings, unless the context or use indicates another or different meaning or intent. Unless the context indicates otherwise, words importing the singular number shall include the plural number and vice versa. Administrative Services Administrator means the City's Administrative Services Administrator or the successor to such officer. Beneficial Owner means any person that has or shares the power, directly or indirectly, to make investment decisions concerning ownership of any Bonds (including persons holding Bonds through nominees, depositories or other intermediaries). Bond Counsel means Pacifica Law Group LLP or an attorney at law or a firm of attorneys, selected by the City, of nationally recognized standing in matters pertaining to the tax-exempt nature of interest on bonds issued by states and their political subdivisions. -2- 10018 00013ia08ep42ck AGENDA ITEM #7. d) Bond Register means the registration books maintained by the Bond Registrar for purposes of identifying ownership of the Bonds or the nominee of each owner, and such other information as the Bond Registrar shall determine. Bond Registrar means, initially, the fiscal agent of the State, for the purposes of registering and authenticating the Bonds, maintaining the Bond Register, effecting transfer of ownership of the Bonds and paying interest on and principal of the Bonds. Bonds mean the limited tax general obligation bonds authorized to be issued in one or more series pursuant to this ordinance in the aggregate principal amount of not to exceed $8,500,000. Certificate of Authentication means the form of certificate of authentication included in the form of Bond attached hereto as Exhibit A. Certificate of Award means the certificate, if any, for the purchase of a series of Bonds awarding the Bonds to the initial purchaser for such Bonds as set forth in Section 12 of this ordinance. Chief Administrative Officer means the Chief Administrative Officer of the City or the successor to such officer. City means the City of Renton, Washington, a municipal corporation duly organized and existing under the laws of the State. City Clerk means the duly appointed and acting City Clerk of the City or the successor to the person fulfilling the duties of that office. Closing means the date of issuance and delivery of a series of Bonds to the applicable Underwriter. -3- 10018 00013ia08ep42ck AGENDA ITEM #7. d) Code means the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 as in effect on the date of issuance of the Tax -Exempt Bonds or (except as otherwise referenced herein) as it may be amended to apply to obligations issued on the date of issuance of the Tax -Exempt Bonds, together with applicable proposed, temporary and final regulations promulgated, and applicable official public guidance published, under the Code. Commission means the United States Securities and Exchange Commission. Continuing Disclosure Certificate means the written undertaking for the benefit of the owners and Beneficial Owners of the Bonds as required by Section (b)(5) of the Rule. Council or City Council means the Renton City Council, as the general legislative body of the City, as the same is duly and regularly constituted from time to time. Debt Service Fund means one or more funds, and accounts held therein, created pursuant to this ordinance for the purpose of paying debt service on a series of Bonds. Designated Representative means each of the Mayor, the Chief Administrative Officer and the Administrative Services Administrator of the City, any successors to the functions of such officers, and their designees. The signature of one Designated Representative shall be sufficient to bind the City. DTC means The Depository Trust Company, New York, New York, a limited purpose trust company organized under the laws of the State of New York, as depository for the Bonds pursuant to this ordinance. Fair Market Value means the price at which a willing buyer would purchase an investment from a willing seller in a bona fide, arm's-length transaction, except for specified investments as described in Treasury Regulation §1.148-5(d)(6), including United States 10018 00013ia08ep42ck AGENDA ITEM #7. d) Treasury obligations, certificates of deposit, guaranteed investment contracts, and investments for yield -restricted defeasance escrows. Fair Market Value is generally determined on the date on which a contract to purchase or sell an investment becomes binding, and, to the extent required by the applicable regulations under the Code, the term "investment" will include a hedge. Federal Tax Certificate means the certificate executed by a Designated Representative setting forth the requirements of the Code for maintaining the tax exemption of interest on any Tax -Exempt Bonds, and any attachments thereto. Government Obligations means those obligations now or hereafter defined as such in chapter 39.53 RCW constituting direct obligations of, or obligations the principal of and interest on which are unconditionally guaranteed by, the United States of America, as such chapter may be hereafter amended or restated. Improvements mean the public improvements within the Revitalization Area that are eligible for financing under chapter 39.104 RCW. Letter of Representations means the Blanket Issuer Letter of Representations given by the City to DTC, as amended from time to time. Local Option Sales and Use Tax means the local option sales and use tax levied and imposed by the City as authorized by RCW 82.14.505 and RCW 82.14.510. Local Option Sales and Use Tax Revenue means the Local Option Sales and Use Tax credit revenues received by the City in an aggregate annual amount of approximately $500,000. -5- 10018 00013ia08ep42ck AGENDA ITEM #7. d) Mayor or City Mayor means the elected Mayor of the City or the successor to the duties of that office. MSRB means the Municipal Securities Rulemaking Board or any successors to its functions. Official Statement means the disclosure documents prepared and delivered in connection with the issuance of a series of Bonds. Project Fund means the fund or account created pursuant to Section 8 of this ordinance. Record Date means the close of business for the Bond Registrar on the day that is 15 days preceding any interest and/or principal payment or redemption date. Registered Owner means the person named as the registered owner of a Bond in the Bond Register. For so long as the Bonds are held in book -entry only form, DTC or its nominee shall be deemed to be the sole Registered Owner. Revitalization Area means the South Lake Washington Revitalization Area designated by the City as a "local revitalization area" within the meaning of chapter 39.104 RCW as provided for in City Ordinance No. 5481. Rule means the Commission's Rule 15c2-12 under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as the same may be amended from time to time. State means the State of Washington. Taxable Bonds means any Bonds determined to be issued on a taxable basis pursuant to Section 12. In 10018 00013ia08ep42ck AGENDA ITEM #7. d) Tax -Exempt Bonds mean any Bonds determined to be issued on a tax-exempt basis under the Code pursuant to Section 12. Underwriter means any initial purchaser for a series of Bonds selected pursuant to Section 12. Section 2. Authorization of the Improvements. The Improvements, as they are to be more fully described in the plans and specifications prepared by and filed with the City, are hereby approved. The cost of all necessary appraisals, negotiation, closing, architectural, engineering, financial, legal and other consulting services, inspection and testing, demolition, administrative and relocation expenses and other costs incurred in connection with the foregoing capital improvements shall be deemed a part of the capital costs of such Improvements. Such Improvements shall be complete with all necessary equipment and appurtenances. The City will determine the exact specifications for the Improvements, and the components thereof, as well as the timing, order and manner of completing the components of the Improvements. The City may alter, make substitutions to, and amend the Improvements as it determines are in the best interests of the City and consistent with chapter 39.104 RCW. Section 3. Authorization and Description of Bonds. For the purpose of paying and/or reimbursing the City for costs of the Improvements and paying costs of issuance, the City is hereby authorized to issue and sell from time to time one or more series of limited tax general obligation bonds in an aggregate principal amount not to exceed $8,500,000 (the "Bonds") -7- 10018 00013ia08ep42ck AGENDA ITEM #7. d) The Bonds of each series shall be general obligations of the City and shall be designated "City of Renton, Washington, Limited Tax General Obligation Bonds, 2019" with additional series designation or other such designation as determined to be necessary by a Designated Representative. The Bonds of each series shall be dated as of the date of Closing for such series of Bonds; shall be fully registered as to both principal and interest; shall be in the denomination of $5,000 each, or any integral multiple thereof, within a maturity; shall be numbered separately in such manner and with any additional designation as the Bond Registrar deems necessary for purposes of identification; shall bear interest from their date payable on the dates and at the rates and commencing as provided in the applicable Certificate of Award; and shall mature on the dates and in the principal amounts set forth in the applicable Certificate of Award, as approved and executed by a Designated Representative pursuant to Section 12 of this ordinance. The Bonds authorized herein may be combined with other limited tax general obligation bonds of the City and sold as a single series and issue if determined to be in the best interest of the City. Section 4. Registration, Exchange and Payments. (a) Bond Registrar/Bond Register. The City hereby specifies and adopts the system of registration approved by the Washington State Finance Committee from time to time through the appointment of State fiscal agencies. The City shall cause the Bond Register to be maintained by the Bond Registrar. So long as any Bonds remain outstanding, the Bond Registrar shall make all necessary provisions to permit the exchange, registration or transfer of Bonds at its designated office. The Bond Registrar may be removed at any time at the option of the Administrative Services Administrator upon prior notice to the Bond Registrar and a In 10018 00013ia08ep42ck AGENDA ITEM #7. d) successor Bond Registrar appointed by the Administrative Services Administrator. No resignation or removal of the Bond Registrar shall be effective until a successor shall have been appointed and until the successor Bond Registrar shall have accepted the duties of the Bond Registrar hereunder. The Bond Registrar is authorized, on behalf of the City, to authenticate and deliver Bonds transferred or exchanged in accordance with the provisions of such Bonds and this ordinance and to carry out all of the Bond Registrar's powers and duties under this ordinance. The Bond Registrar shall be responsible for its representations contained in the Certificate of Authentication of the Bonds. (b) Registered Ownership. The City and the Bond Registrar, each in its discretion, may deem and treat the Registered Owner of each Bond of a series as the absolute owner thereof for all purposes (except as provided in a Continuing Disclosure Certificate), and neither the City nor the Bond Registrar shall be affected by any notice to the contrary. Payment of any such Bond shall be made only as described in Section 4(g), but such Bond may be transferred as herein provided. All such payments made as described in Section 4(g) shall be valid and shall satisfy and discharge the liability of the City upon such Bond to the extent of the amount or amounts so paid. (c) DTC Acceptance/Letters of Representations. The Bonds of a series initially shall be held in fully immobilized form by DTC acting as depository. The City has executed and delivered to DTC the Letter of Representations. Neither the City nor the Bond Registrar shall have any responsibility or obligation to DTC participants or the persons for whom they act as nominees (or any successor depository) with respect to the Bonds in respect of the accuracy of any records maintained by DTC (or any successor depository) or any DTC -9- 10018 00013ia08ep42ck AGENDA ITEM #7. d) participant, the payment by DTC (or any successor depository) or any DTC participant of any amount in respect of the principal of or interest on Bonds, any notice which is permitted or required to be given to Registered Owners under this ordinance (except such notices as shall be required to be given by the City to the Bond Registrar or to DTC (or any successor depository)), or any consent given or other action taken by DTC (or any successor depository) as the Registered Owner. For so long as any Bonds are held by a depository, DTC or its successor depository or its nominee shall be deemed to be the Registered Owner for all purposes hereunder, and all references herein to the Registered Owners shall mean DTC (or any successor depository) or its nominee and shall not mean the owners of any beneficial interest in such Bonds. (d) Use of Depository. (1) The Bonds shall be registered initially in the name of "Cede & Co.," as nominee of DTC, with one Bond of each series maturing on each of the maturity dates for the Bonds in a denomination corresponding to the total principal therein designated to mature on such date. Registered ownership of such Bonds, or any portions thereof, may not thereafter be transferred except (A) to any successor of DTC or its nominee, provided that any such successor shall be qualified under any applicable laws to provide the service proposed to be provided by it; (B) to any substitute depository appointed by the Administrative Services Administrator pursuant to subsection (2) below or such substitute depository's successor; or (C) to any person as provided in subsection (4) below. (2) Upon the resignation of DTC or its successor (or any substitute depository or its successor) from its functions as depository or a determination by the -10- 10018 00013ia08ep42ck AGENDA ITEM #7. d) Administrative Services Administrator to discontinue the system of book -entry transfers through DTC or its successor (or any substitute depository or its successor), the Administrative Services Administrator may hereafter appoint a substitute depository. Any such substitute depository shall be qualified under any applicable laws to provide the services proposed to be provided by it. (3) In the case of any transfer pursuant to clause (A) or (B) of subsection (1) above, the Bond Registrar shall, upon receipt of all outstanding Bonds together with a written request on behalf of the Administrative Services Administrator, issue a single new Bond for each maturity of that series then outstanding, registered in the name of such successor depository or such substitute depository, or their nominees, as the case may be, all as specified in such written request of the Administrative Services Administrator. (4) In the event that (A) DTC or its successor (or substitute depository or its successor) resigns from its functions as depository, and no substitute depository can be obtained, or (B) the Administrative Services Administrator determines that it is in the best interest of the Beneficial Owners of the Bonds that such owners be able to obtain physical bond certificates, the ownership of such Bonds may then be transferred to any person or entity as herein provided, and shall no longer be held by a depository. The Administrative Services Administrator shall deliver a written request to the Bond Registrar, together with a supply of physical bonds, to issue Bonds as herein provided in any authorized denomination. Upon receipt by the Bond Registrar of all then outstanding Bonds of a series together with a written request on behalf of the Administrative Services Administrator to the Bond Registrar, new -11- 10018 00013ia08ep42ck AGENDA ITEM #7. d) Bonds of such series shall be issued in the appropriate denominations and registered in the names of such persons as are requested in such written request. (e) Registration of Transfer of Ownership or Exchange; Change in Denominations. The transfer of any Bond may be registered and Bonds may be exchanged, but no transfer of any such Bond shall be valid unless it is surrendered to the Bond Registrar with the assignment form appearing on such Bond duly executed by the Registered Owner or such Registered Owner's duly authorized agent in a manner satisfactory to the Bond Registrar. Upon such surrender, the Bond Registrar shall cancel the surrendered Bond and shall authenticate and deliver, without charge to the Registered Owner or transferee therefor, a new Bond (or Bonds at the option of the new Registered Owner) of the same date, series, maturity, and interest rate and for the same aggregate principal amount in any authorized denomination, naming as Registered Owner the person or persons listed as the assignee on the assignment form appearing on the surrendered Bond, in exchange for such surrendered and cancelled Bond. Any Bond may be surrendered to the Bond Registrar and exchanged, without charge, for an equal aggregate principal amount of Bonds of the same date, series, maturity, and interest rate, in any authorized denomination. The Bond Registrar shall not be obligated to register the transfer of or to exchange any Bond during the 15 days preceding any principal payment or redemption date. (f) Bond Registrar's Ownership of Bonds. The Bond Registrar may become the Registered Owner of any Bond with the same rights it would have if it were not the Bond Registrar, and to the extent permitted by law, may act as depository for and permit any of its officers or directors to act as a member of, or in any other capacity with respect to, any -12- 10018 00013ia08ep42ck AGENDA ITEM #7. d) committee formed to protect the right of the Registered Owners or Beneficial Owners of Bonds. (g) Place and Medium of Payment. Both principal of and interest on the Bonds shall be payable in lawful money of the United States of America. Interest on the Bonds shall be calculated on the basis of a year of 360 days and twelve 30-day months. For so long as all Bonds are held by a depository, payments of principal thereof and interest thereon shall be made as provided in accordance with the operational arrangements of DTC referred to in the Letter of Representations. In the event that the Bonds are no longer held by a depository, interest on the Bonds shall be paid by check or draft mailed to the Registered Owners at the addresses for such Registered Owners appearing on the Bond Register on the Record Date, or upon the written request of a Registered Owner of more than $1,000,000 of Bonds (received by the Bond Registrar at least by the Record Date), such payment shall be made by the Bond Registrar by wire transfer to the account within the United States designated by the Registered Owner. Principal of the Bonds shall be payable upon presentation and surrender of such Bonds by the Registered Owners at the designated office of the Bond Registrar. If any Bond is duly presented for payment and funds have not been provided by the City on the applicable payment date, then interest will continue to accrue thereafter on the unpaid principal thereof at the rate stated on the Bond until the Bond is paid. Section 5. Redemption Prior to Maturity and Purchase of Bonds. (a) Mandatory Redemption of Term Bonds and Optional Redemption. The Bonds of each series shall be subject to mandatory redemption of term bonds to the extent, if any, set forth in the Certificate of Award and as approved by a Designated Representative pursuant to -13- 10018 00013ia08ep42ck AGENDA ITEM #7. d) Section 12. The Bonds of each series shall be subject to optional redemption on the dates, at the prices and under the terms set forth in the Certificate of Award approved by a Designated Representative pursuant to Section 12. (b) Selection of Bonds for Redemption. For as long as the Bonds of a series are held in book -entry only form, the selection of particular Bonds within a series and maturity to be redeemed shall be made in accordance with the operational arrangements then in effect at DTC. If the Bonds are no longer held by a depository, the selection of such Bonds to be redeemed and the surrender and reissuance thereof, as applicable, shall be made as provided in the following provisions of this subsection (b). If the City redeems at any one time fewer than all of the Bonds of a series having the same maturity date, the particular Bonds or portions of Bonds of such maturity to be redeemed shall be selected by lot (or in such manner as determined by the Bond Registrar) in increments of $5,000. In the case of a Bond of a denomination greater than $5,000, the City and the Bond Registrar shall treat each Bond as representing such number of separate Bonds each of the denomination of $5,000 as is obtained by dividing the actual principal amount of such Bond by $5,000. In the event that only a portion of the principal sum of a Bond is redeemed, upon surrender of such Bond at the designated office of the Bond Registrar there shall be issued to the Registered Owner, without charge therefor, for the then unredeemed balance of the principal sum thereof, at the option of the Registered Owner, a Bond or Bonds of like series, maturity and interest rate in any of the denominations herein authorized. -14- 10018 00013ia08ep42ck AGENDA ITEM #7. d) (c) Notice of Redemption. (1) Official Notice. For so long as the Bonds of a series are held by a depository, notice of redemption shall be given in accordance with the operational arrangements of DTC as then in effect, and neither the City nor the Bond Registrar shall provide any notice of redemption to any Beneficial Owners. The notice of redemption may be conditional. Unless waived by any Registered Owner of Bonds to be redeemed, official notice of any such redemption (which redemption may be conditioned by the Bond Registrar on the receipt of sufficient funds for redemption or otherwise) shall be given by the Bond Registrar on behalf of the City by mailing a copy of an official redemption notice by first class mail at least 20 days and not more than 60 days prior to the date fixed for redemption to the Registered Owner of the Bond or Bonds to be redeemed at the address shown on the Bond Register or at such other address as is furnished in writing by such Registered Owner to the Bond Registrar. All official notices of redemption shall be dated and shall state: (A) the redemption date, (B) the redemption price, (C) if fewer than all outstanding Bonds of such series are to be redeemed, the identification by series and maturity (and, in the case of partial redemption, the respective principal amounts) of the Bonds to be redeemed, (D) any conditions to redemption, (E) that unless conditional notice of redemption has been given and such conditions have either been satisfied or waived, on the redemption date the redemption -15- 10018 00013ia08ep42ck AGENDA ITEM #7. d) price shall become due and payable upon each such Bond or portion thereof called for redemption, and that interest thereon shall cease to accrue from and after said date, and (F) the place where such Bonds are to be surrendered for payment of the redemption price, which place of payment shall be the designated office of the Bond Registrar. On or prior to any redemption date, unless any condition to such redemption has not been satisfied or waived or notice of such redemption has been rescinded or revoked, the City shall deposit with the Bond Registrar an amount of money sufficient to pay the redemption price of all the Bonds or portions of Bonds which are to be redeemed on that date. The City retains the right to rescind any redemption notice and the related optional redemption of Bonds by giving notice of rescission to the affected Registered Owners at any time on or prior to the scheduled redemption date. Any notice of optional redemption that is so rescinded shall be of no effect, and the Bonds for which the notice of optional redemption has been rescinded shall remain outstanding. (2) Effect of Notice; Bonds Due. If notice of redemption has been given and not rescinded or revoked, or if the conditions set forth in a conditional notice of redemption have been satisfied or waived, the Bonds of such series or portions of Bonds to be redeemed shall, on the redemption date, become due and payable at the redemption price therein specified, and from and after such date such Bonds or portions of Bonds shall cease to bear interest. Upon surrender of such Bonds for redemption in accordance with said notice, such Bonds shall be paid by the Bond Registrar at the redemption price. Installments of interest due on or prior to the redemption date shall be payable as herein provided for payment of interest. -16- 10018 00013ia08ep42ck AGENDA ITEM #7. d) All Bonds which have been redeemed shall be canceled by the Bond Registrar and shall not be reissued. (3) Additional Notice. In addition to the foregoing notice, further notice shall be given by the City as set out below, but no defect in said further notice nor any failure to give all or any portion of such further notice shall in any manner defeat the effectiveness of a call for redemption if notice thereof is given as above prescribed. Each further notice of redemption given hereunder shall contain the information required above for an official notice of redemption plus (A) the CUSIP numbers of all Bonds being redeemed; (B) the date of issue of the Bonds as originally issued; (C) the rate of interest borne by each Bond being redeemed; (D) the series and maturity date of each Bond being redeemed; and (E) any other descriptive information needed to identify accurately the Bonds being redeemed. Each further notice of redemption may be sent at least 20 days before the redemption date to each party entitled to receive notice pursuant to the applicable Continuing Disclosure Certificate and with such additional information as the City shall deem appropriate, but such mailings shall not be a condition precedent to the redemption of such Bonds. (4) Amendment of Notice Provisions. The foregoing notice provisions of this Section 5, including but not limited to the information to be included in redemption notices and the persons designated to receive notices, may be amended by additions, deletions and changes in order to maintain compliance with duly promulgated regulations and recommendations regarding notices of redemption of municipal securities. (d) Purchase of Bonds. The City reserves the right to purchase any or all of the Bonds offered to it at any time at a price deemed reasonable by the Administrative Services -17- 10018 00013ia08ep42ck AGENDA ITEM #7. d) Administrator plus accrued interest to the date of purchase. Section 6. Form of Bonds. The Bonds shall be in substantially the form set forth in Exhibit A, which is incorporated herein by this reference, with such changes thereto as may be approved by the Designated Representative, consistent with the provisions of Section 12 hereof. Section 7. Execution of Bonds. The Bonds shall be executed on behalf of the City by the facsimile or manual signature of the Mayor and shall be attested to by the facsimile or manual signature of the City Clerk, and shall have the seal of the City impressed or a facsimile thereof imprinted or otherwise reproduced thereon. In the event any officer who shall have signed or whose facsimile signatures appear on any of the Bonds shall cease to be such officer of the City before said Bonds shall have been authenticated or delivered by the Bond Registrar or issued by the City, such Bonds may nevertheless be authenticated, delivered and issued and, upon such authentication, delivery and issuance, shall be as binding upon the City as though said person had not ceased to be such officer. Any Bond may be signed and attested on behalf of the City by such persons who, at the actual date of execution of such Bond shall be the proper officer of the City, although at the original date of such Bond such persons were not such officers of the City. Only such Bonds as shall bear thereon a Certificate of Authentication manually executed by an authorized representative of the Bond Registrar shall be valid or obligatory for any purpose or entitled to the benefits of this ordinance. Such Certificate of Authentication shall be conclusive evidence that the Bonds so authenticated have been duly executed, authenticated and delivered hereunder and are entitled to the benefits of this ordinance. 10018 00013ia08ep42ck AGENDA ITEM #7. d) Section 8. Application of Bond Proceeds; Project Fund. The Administrative Services Administrator is hereby authorized to create a fund or account (the "Project Fund"), and subaccounts therein as necessary, for the purposes set forth in this section. A portion of the proceeds of each series of Bonds, net of any Underwriter's discount and fees, shall be deposited in the Project Fund in the amounts specified in the closing memorandum prepared in connection with the issuance of such Bonds. Such proceeds shall be used to pay and/or reimburse the City for the costs of the Improvements and, unless otherwise provided by the City, to pay costs of issuance of such Bonds. The Administrative Services Administrator shall invest money in the Project Fund and the subaccounts contained therein in such obligations as may now or hereafter be permitted by law to cities of the State and which will mature prior to the date on which such money shall be needed, but only to the extent that the same are acquired, valued and disposed of at Fair Market Value. Any remaining Bond proceeds (including interest earnings thereon) may be used for other capital projects of the City or shall be transferred to the Debt Service Fund for the allocable series of Bonds. Section 9. Tax Covenants. The City will take all actions necessary to assure the exclusion of interest on any Tax -Exempt Bonds from the gross income of the owners of such Tax -Exempt Bonds to the same extent as such interest is permitted to be excluded from gross income under the Code as in effect on the date of issuance of such Tax -Exempt Bonds, including but not limited to the following: (a) Private Activity Bond Limitation. The City will assure that the proceeds of the Tax -Exempt Bonds are not so used as to cause the Tax -Exempt Bonds to satisfy the private -19- 10018 00013ia08ep42ck AGENDA ITEM #7. d) business tests of Section 141(b) of the Code or the private loan financing test of Section 141(c) of the Code. (b) Limitations on Disposition of Improvements. The City will not sell or otherwise transfer or dispose of (i) any personal property components of the Improvements other than in the ordinary course of an established government program under Treasury Regulation 1.141- 2(d)(4) or (ii) any real property components of the Improvements, unless it has received an opinion of Bond Counsel to the effect that such disposition will not adversely affect the treatment of interest on the Tax -Exempt Bonds as excludable from gross income for federal income tax purposes. (c) Federal Guarantee Prohibition. The City will not take any action or permit or suffer any action to be taken if the result of such action would be to cause any of the Tax - Exempt Bonds to be "federally guaranteed" within the meaning of Section 149(b) of the Code. (d) Rebate Requirement. The City will take any and all actions necessary to assure compliance with Section 148(f) of the Code, relating to the rebate of excess investment earnings, if any, to the federal government, to the extent that such section is applicable to the Tax -Exempt Bonds. (e) No Arbitrage. The City will not take, or permit or suffer to be taken, any action with respect to the proceeds of the Tax -Exempt Bonds which, if such action had been reasonably expected to have been taken, or had been deliberately and intentionally taken, on the date of issuance of the Tax -Exempt Bonds would have caused the Tax -Exempt Bonds to be "arbitrage bonds" within the meaning of Section 148 of the Code. -20- 10018 00013ia08ep42ck AGENDA ITEM #7. d) (f) Registration Covenant. The City will maintain a system for recording the ownership of each Tax -Exempt Bond that complies with the provisions of Section 149 of the Code until all Tax -Exempt Bonds have been surrendered and canceled. (g) Record Retention. The City will retain its records of all accounting and monitoring it carries out with respect to the Tax -Exempt Bonds for at least three years after the Tax -Exempt Bonds mature or are redeemed (whichever is earlier); however, if the Tax -Exempt Bonds are redeemed and refunded, the City will retain its records of accounting and monitoring at least three years after the earlier of the maturity or redemption of the obligations that refunded the Tax -Exempt Bonds. (h) Compliance with Federal Tax Certificate. The City will comply with the provisions of the Federal Tax Certificate with respect to a series of Tax -Exempt Bonds, which are incorporated herein as if fully set forth herein. The covenants of this Section will survive payment in full or defeasance of the Tax -Exempt Bonds. (i) Bank Qualification. In the Federal Tax Certificate executed in connection with the issuance of each series of Tax -Exempt Bonds, the City may designate such Bonds as "qualified tax-exempt obligations" under Section 265(b)(3) of the Code for investment by financial institutions if the City does not reasonably expect to issue more than $10,000,000 of qualified tax-exempt obligations in the calendar year in which such Tax -Exempt Bonds are issued. Section 10. Debt Service Fund and Provision for Tax Levy Payments. The City hereby authorizes the creation of one or more funds, and accounts held therein, to be used for the payment of debt service on each series of Bonds, designated as the "Limited Tax General -21- 10018 00013ia08ep42ck AGENDA ITEM #7. d) Obligation Bond Debt Service Fund" or other such designation selected by the City (the "Debt Service Fund"). No later than the date each payment of principal of or interest on the Bonds becomes due, the City shall transmit sufficient funds, from the Debt Service Fund or from other legally available sources, to the Bond Registrar for the payment of such principal or interest. Money in the Debt Service Fund may be invested in legal investments for City funds, but only to the extent that the same are acquired, valued and disposed of at Fair Market Value. Any interest or profit from the investment of such money shall be deposited in the Debt Service Fund. The City hereby irrevocably covenants and agrees for as long as any of the Bonds are outstanding and unpaid that each year it shall include in its budget and levy an ad valorem tax upon all the property within the City subject to taxation in an amount that will be sufficient, together with all other revenues and money of the City legally available for such purposes, to pay the principal of and interest on the Bonds as the same shall become due. The City hereby irrevocably pledges that the annual tax provided for herein to be levied for the payment of such principal and interest shall be within and as a part of the property tax levy permitted to cities without a vote of the electorate, and that a sufficient portion of each annual levy to be levied and collected by the City prior to the full payment of the principal of and interest on the Bonds will be and is hereby irrevocably set aside, pledged and appropriated for the payment of the principal of and interest on the Bonds. The full faith, credit and resources of the City are hereby irrevocably pledged for the annual levy and collection of such taxes and for the prompt payment of the principal of and interest on the Bonds when due. -22- 10018 00013ia08ep42ck AGENDA ITEM #7. d) The City hereby further irrevocably pledges all Local Option Sales and Use Tax Revenues to the portion of the Bonds allocable to the Improvements. The City further covenants to impose the Local Option Sales and Use Tax, collect the Local Option Sales and Use Tax Revenues under and in accordance with RCW 82.14.505 and RCW 82.14.510, and apply Local Option Sales and Use Tax Revenues to pay debt service on the portion of the Bonds allocable to the Improvements. In the event that the Bonds authorized herein are combined with other limited tax general obligation bonds of the City and sold as a single series, the Local Option Sales and Use Tax Revenues shall be pledged to the portion of the combined series of bonds allocable to the Improvements. Section 11. Defeasance. In the event that the City, in order to effect the payment, retirement or redemption of any Bond, sets aside in the Debt Service Fund or in another special account, cash or noncallable Government Obligations, or any combination of cash and/or noncallable Government Obligations, in amounts and maturities that, together with the known earned income therefrom, are sufficient to redeem or pay and retire such Bond in accordance with its terms and to pay when due the interest and redemption premium, if any, thereon, and such cash and/or noncallable Government Obligations are irrevocably set aside and pledged for such purpose, then no further payments need be made into the Debt Service Fund for the payment of the principal of and interest on such Bond. The owner of a Bond so provided for shall cease to be entitled to any lien, benefit or security of this ordinance except the right to receive payment of principal, premium, if any, and interest from the Debt Service Fund or such special account, and such Bond shall be deemed to be not outstanding under this -23- 10018 00013ia08ep42ck AGENDA ITEM #7. d) ordinance. The City shall give written notice of defeasance of any Bonds of a series in accordance with the applicable Continuing Disclosure Certificate. Section 12. Sale of Bonds. (a) Bond Sale. The Council has determined that it would be in the best interest of the City to delegate to the Designated Representatives, for a limited time, the authority to designate each series of Bonds as Tax -Exempt Bonds or Taxable Bonds and to approve the final interest rates, maturity dates, redemption terms and principal maturities for each series of Bonds. A Designated Representative may also determine to combine the Bonds authorized herein with other authorized limited tax general obligation bonds of the City and to sell such bonds as a single series and issue. (b) Competitive Sale. The Bonds of each series shall be sold by competitive public sale. A Designated Representative shall with respect to such series of Bonds: (1) establish the date of the public sale; (2) establish the criteria by which the successful bidder will be determined; (3) request that a good faith deposit accompany each bid; (4) cause notice of the public sale to be given; and (5) provide for such other matters pertaining to the public sale as he or she deems necessary or desirable. A Designated Representative shall cause the notice of sale to be given and provide for such other matters pertaining to the public sale as he or she deems necessary or desirable. The Bonds of such series shall be sold to the Underwriter pursuant to the terms of a Certificate of Award. (c) Sale Parameters. Subject to the terms and conditions set forth in this Section 12, each Designated Representative is hereby authorized to designate each series of Bonds as Tax -Exempt Bonds or Taxable Bonds and to determine the final interest rates, aggregate -24- 10018 00013ia08ep42ck AGENDA ITEM #7. d) principal amount, principal maturities, and redemption rights for each series of Bonds in the manner provided hereafter so long as: (1) the aggregate principal (face) amount of all Bonds issued under the authority granted in this ordinance does not exceed $8,500,000, (2) the final maturity date for the Bonds of each series is no later than December 1, 2044, (3) the aggregate purchase price for the Bonds of each series shall be no less than 98% of the aggregate stated principal amount of the Bonds of each series, (4) the true interest cost for the Tax -Exempt Bonds (in the aggregate for such series) does not exceed 5.00%, (5) the true interest cost for the Taxable Bonds (in the aggregate for such series) does not exceed 5.00%, and (6) the Bonds of each series otherwise conform to all other terms of this ordinance. Subject to the terms and conditions set forth in this section, each Designated Representative is hereby authorized to select the Underwriter and to execute the Certificate of Award on behalf of the City for each series of Bonds. The signature of one Designated Representative shall be sufficient to bind the City. Following the execution of the Certificate of Award, a Designated Representative shall provide a report to the Council describing the final terms of the Bonds sold pursuant to such Certificate of Award and approved pursuant to the authority delegated in this section. The authority granted to the Designated Representatives by this Section 12 shall expire one year -25- 10018 00013ia08ep42ck AGENDA ITEM #7. d) after the effective date of this ordinance. If a Certificate of Award for the Bonds has not been executed within one year after the effective date of this ordinance, the authorization for the issuance of the Bonds shall be rescinded, and the Bonds shall not be issued nor their sale approved unless such Bonds are re -authorized by ordinance of the Council. The ordinance re- authorizing the issuance and sale of such Bonds may be in the form of a new ordinance repealing this ordinance in whole or in part or may be in the form of an amendatory ordinance approving a Certificate of Award or establishing terms and conditions for the authority delegated under this Section 12. (f) Delivery of Bonds; Documentation. Upon the passage and approval of this ordinance and execution of the Certificate of Award, the proper officials of the City, including the Designated Representatives and the City Clerk, are authorized and directed to undertake all action necessary for the prompt execution and delivery of the Bonds of a series to the Underwriter and further to execute all closing certificates and documents required to effect the closing and delivery of the Bonds of a series in accordance with the terms of the Certificate of Award. Such documents may include, but are not limited to, documents related to a municipal bond insurance policy delivered by an insurer to insure the payment when due of the principal of and interest on all or a portion of a series of Bonds as provided therein, if such insurance is determined by a Designated Representative to be in the best interest of the City. Section 13. Preliminary and Final Official Statements. Each Designated Representative is hereby authorized to deem final the preliminary Official Statement relating to a series of Bonds for the purposes of the Rule. Each Designated Representative is further authorized to approve for purposes of the Rule, on behalf of the City, the final Official -26- 10018 00013ia08ep42ck AGENDA ITEM #7. d) Statement relating to the issuance and sale of a series of Bonds and the distribution of the final Official Statement in accordance with the Rule with such changes, if any, as may be deemed by him or her to be appropriate. Section 14. Undertaking to Provide Ongoing Disclosure. The City covenants to execute and deliver at the time of Closing of a series of Bonds a Continuing Disclosure Certificate. Each Designated Representative is hereby authorized to execute and deliver a Continuing Disclosure Certificate upon the issuance, delivery and sale of a series of Bonds with such terms and provisions as such officer shall deem appropriate and in the best interests of the City. Section 15. Lost, Stolen or Destroyed Bonds. In case any Bonds are lost, stolen or destroyed, the Bond Registrar may authenticate and deliver a new Bond or Bonds of like series, amount, date and tenor to the Registered Owner thereof if the Registered Owner pays the expenses and charges of the Bond Registrar and the City in connection therewith and files with the Bond Registrar and the City evidence satisfactory to both that such Bond or Bonds were actually lost, stolen or destroyed and of his or her ownership thereof, and furnishes the City and the Bond Registrar with indemnity satisfactory to both. Section 16. Severability; Ratification. If any one or more of the covenants or agreements provided in this ordinance to be performed on the part of the City shall be declared by any court of competent jurisdiction to be contrary to law, then such covenant or covenants, agreement or agreements, shall be null and void and shall be deemed separable from the remaining covenants and agreements of this ordinance and shall in no way affect the validity of the other provisions of this ordinance or of the Bonds. All acts taken pursuant to the -27- 10018 00013ia08ep42ck AGENDA ITEM #7. d) authority granted in this ordinance but prior to its effective date are hereby ratified and confirmed. Section 17. Payments Due on Business Days. If an interest and/or principal payment date for the Bonds is not a business day, then payment shall be made on the next business day and no interest shall accrue for the intervening period. Section 18. Corrections by Clerk. Upon approval of the City Attorney and Bond Counsel, the City Clerk is hereby authorized to make necessary corrections to this ordinance, including but not limited to the correction of clerical errors; references to other local, State or federal laws, codes, rules, or regulations; ordinance numbering and section/subsection numbering; and other similar necessary corrections. Section 19. Effective Date. This ordinance shall be effective upon its passage, approval, and thirty (30) days after publication. PASSED by the City Council this 11th day of February, 2019. Jason A. Seth, CIVIC, City Clerk APPROVED BY THE MAYOR this 11th day of February, 2019. Denis Law, Mayor Approved as to form: Pacifica Law Group LLP Bond Counsel Date of Publication: 10018 00013ia08ep42ck AGENDA ITEM #7. d) NO. Exhibit A Form of Bond [DTC LANGUAGE] UNITED STATES OF AMERICA STATE OF WASHINGTON CITY OF RENTON LIMITED TAX GENERAL OBLIGATION BOND, 2019[(Taxable)] INTEREST RATE: % MATURITY DATE: CUSIP NO.: REGISTERED OWNER: CEDE & CO. PRINCIPAL AMOUNT: The City of Renton, Washington (the "City"), hereby acknowledges itself to owe and for value received promises to pay to the Registered Owner identified above, or registered assigns, on the Maturity Date identified above, the Principal Amount indicated above and to pay interest thereon from , 20, or the most recent date to which interest has been paid or duly provided for until payment of this bond at the Interest Rate set forth above, payable on 1, 20, and semiannually thereafter on the first days of each succeeding and . Both principal of and interest on this bond are payable in lawful money of the United States of America. The fiscal agent of the State of Washington has been appointed by the City as the authenticating agent, paying agent and registrar for the bonds of this issue (the "Bond Registrar"). For so long as the bonds of this issue are held in fully immobilized form, payments of principal thereof and interest thereon shall be made as provided in accordance with the operational arrangements of The Depository Trust Company ("DTC') referred to in the Blanket Issuer Letter of Representations (the "Letter of Representations") from the City to DTC. The bonds of this issue are issued under and in accordance with the provisions of the Constitution and applicable statutes of the State of Washington and Ordinance No. , duly passed by the City Council on , 2019 (the "Bond Ordinance"). Capitalized terms used in this bond have the meanings given such terms in the Bond Ordinance. This bond shall not be valid or become obligatory for any purpose or be entitled to any security or benefit under the Bond Ordinance until the Certificate of Authentication hereon shall have been manually signed by or on behalf of the Bond Registrar or its duly designated agent. A-1 10018 00013 b0ft42ck AGENDA ITEM #7. d) This bond is one of an authorized issue of bonds of like series, date, tenor, rate of interest and date of maturity, except as to number and amount in the aggregate principal amount of $ and is issued pursuant to the Bond Ordinance to provide a portion of the funds necessary to pay the costs of certain public improvements meeting the requirements of RCW 39.104.020 and to pay costs of issuance. The bonds of this issue are subject to redemption prior to their stated maturities as provided in the Certificate of Award. The City has irrevocably covenanted and agreed for as long as the bonds of this issue are outstanding and unpaid that each year it shall include in its budget and levy an ad valorem tax upon all the property within the City subject to taxation in an amount that will be sufficient, together with all other revenues and money of the City legally available for such purposes, to pay the principal of and interest on the bonds of this issue as the same shall become due. The City has irrevocably pledged that the annual tax provided for to be levied for the payment of such principal and interest shall be within and as a part of the property tax levy permitted to cities without a vote of the electorate, and that a sufficient portion of each annual levy to be levied and collected by the City prior to the full payment of the principal of and interest on the bonds of this issue will be and is hereby irrevocably set aside, pledged and appropriated for the payment of the principal of and interest on the bonds of this issue. The full faith, credit and resources of the City have been irrevocably pledged for the annual levy and collection of such taxes and for the prompt payment of the principal of and interest on the bonds of this issue when due. The City has further irrevocably pledged all Local Option Sales and Use Tax Revenues to the portion of the bonds of this issue allocable to the Improvements. The City further covenanted to impose the Local Option Sales and Use Tax, collect the Local Option Sales and Use Tax Revenues under and in accordance with RCW 82.14.505 and RCW 82.14.510, and apply Local Option Sales and Use Tax Revenues to pay debt service on the portion of the bonds of this issue allocable to the Improvements. In the event that the Bonds are combined with other limited tax general obligation bonds of the City and sold as a single series, the Local Option Sales and Use Tax Revenues shall be pledged to the portion of the combined series of bonds allocable to the Improvements. It is hereby certified that all acts, conditions and things required by the Constitution and statutes of the State of Washington to exist and to have happened, been done and performed precedent to and in the issuance of this bond exist and have happened, and have been done and performed and that the issuance of this bond and the bonds of this issue does not violate any constitutional, statutory or other limitation upon the amount of bonded indebtedness that the City may incur. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the City of Renton, Washington, has caused this bond to be executed by the manual or facsimile signatures of the Mayor and the City Clerk and the seal of the City to be imprinted, impressed or otherwise reproduced hereon as of this day of A-2 10018 00013 b0ft42ck AGENDA ITEM #7. d) [SEAL] ATTEST: , 20 manual or facsimile City Clerk CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON By /s/ manual or facsimile Mayor The Bond Registrar's Certificate of Authentication on the Bonds shall be in substantially the following form: CERTIFICATE OF AUTHENTICATION Date of Authentication: This bond is one of the bonds described in the within -mentioned Bond Ordinance and is one of the Limited Tax General Obligation Bonds, 2019, of the City of Renton, Washington, dated 12019. WASHINGTON STATE FISCAL AGENT, as Bond Registrar A-3 10018 00013ia08ep42ck AGENDA ITEM #7. d) CERTIFICATE I, the undersigned, City Clerk of the City Council of the City of Renton, Washington (the "City"), DO HEREBY CERTIFY: 1. The attached copy of Ordinance No. (the "Ordinance") is a full, true and correct copy of an ordinance duly passed at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City held at the regular meeting place thereof on as that ordinance appears in the minute book of the City; and the Ordinance will be in full force and effect after its passage and publication as provided by law; and 2. That said meeting was duly convened and held in all respects in accordance with law, and to the extent required by law, due and proper notice of such meeting was given; that a legal quorum was present throughout the meeting and a legally sufficient number of members of the Council voted in the proper manner for the passage of said Ordinance; and that all other requirements and proceedings incident to the proper passage of said Ordinance have been fully fulfilled, carried out and otherwise observed. 3. That Ordinance No. has not been amended, supplemented or rescinded since its passage and is in full force and effect and that I am authorized to execute this certificate. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand this day of , 2019. City Clerk 10018 00013ia08ep42ck AGENDA ITEM #7. e) AB - 2308 C[TY OF -----wwwo�Renton uOo�" SUBJECT/TITLE: RECOMMENDED ACTION DEPARTMENT: STAFF CONTACT: EXT.: None Resolution approving revision to TIAA Deferred Compensation 457(b) plan document, and approve 457 Committee's authority to revise plan documents Council Concur Human Resources / Risk Management Department Ellen Bradley-Mak, Administrator 7657 In Resolution 4337 (signed April 2, 2018) Council adopted multiple documents governing the city's 457(b) deferred compensation program. The 457 Committee, whose members include staff from the City and the Renton Regional Fire Authority (RRFA), at their December 2018 meeting, voted in favor of allowing members to roll Roth contributions from prior employer plans into the Renton plan. This requires an amendment to one of the TIAA plan documents that Council adopted as part of Resolution 4337. The 457 Committee requests that Council approve this administrative change to the TIAA plan document. In addition, a Resolution is attached to grant the 457 Committee authority to make administrative changes to the plan documents, in the future, that do not impact the city's budget. A. Resolution Adopt Resolution that 1) approves an administrative change to the city's deferred compensation, 457(b) plan document from TIAA, to allow members to rollover Roth contributions into the Renton 457(b) plan, and 2) approves the authority of the city's 457 Committee to make administrative revisions to the deferred compensation plan documents in the future, if the revisions do not impact the city's budget. AGENDA ITEM #7. e) CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON, ADOPTING AN AMENDED SECTION 18, ROLLOVER CONTRIBUTIONS, OF THE ADOPTION AGREEMENT CONTAINED WITHIN THE CITY'S 457(b) DEFERRED COMPENSATION PLAN, AND AUTHORIZING THE 457(b) DEFERRED COMPENSATION PLAN COMMITTEE TO AMEND OR UPDATE THE CITY'S 457(b) DEFERRED COMPENSATION PLAN, PROVIDED THAT SUCH AMENDMENTS OR UPDATES DO NOT IMPACT THE CITY'S BUDGET. WHEREAS, Resolution No. 4221 granted the HRRM Administrator the authority to establish and maintain on behalf of the City an Investment Committee for the City's 457(b) Deferred Compensation Plan (hereafter "457 Deferred Compensation Plan Committee"); and WHEREAS, effective in 2016, the Renton Regional Fire Authority ("RRFA") elected to participate in the City of Renton 457(b) Deferred Compensation Plan, and via Resolution No. 4337 the City Council adopted an amended and restated 457(b) Deferred Compensation Plan as the City's and the RRFA's joint multi -employer plan (Exhibit A to Resolution No. 4337); and WHEREAS, Resolution No. 4337 also confirmed the 457 Deferred Compensation Plan Committee's updated Operating Guidelines which named the voting members of the 457 Deferred Compensation Plan Committee to include representatives of both the City and the RRFA; and WHEREAS, at its December 18, 2018 meeting, the 457 Deferred Compensation Plan Committee reviewed and approved an amendment to Section 18, Rollover Contributions, of the Adoption Agreement contained within the 457(b) Deferred Compensation Plan. The amendment consists of selecting Section 18's option "A" which permits the following (to the extent permitted 1 AGENDA ITEM #7. e) RESOLUTION NO. bylaw): "Rollovers to the Plan, including rollovers of Roth Elective Deferrals." Previously, Section 18's option "B" (excluding rollovers of Roth Elective Deferrals) had been selected; and WHEREAS, the City Council desires to ratify the 457 Deferred Compensation Plan Committee's amendment and, further, delegate authority to the 457 Deferred Compensation Plan Committee to make such subsequent amendments or updates to the 457(b) Deferred Compensation Plan as may be necessary or desired, provided that such amendments or updates do not impact the City's budget; NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON, DO RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS: SECTION I. The City Council hereby adopts an amended Section 18, Rollover Contributions, on page 7 of the Adoption Agreement contained within the City's 457(b) Deferred Compensation Plan, attached hereto as Exhibit A. All other portions of the 457(b) Deferred Compensation Plan adopted via Resolution No. 4337 remain in effect and unchanged; however, the City Council hereby authorizes the 457 Deferred Compensation Plan Committee to make such subsequent amendments or updates to the 457(b) Deferred Compensation Plan as may be necessary or desired, provided that such amendments or updates do not impact the City's budget. PASSED BY THE CITY COUNCIL this day of 12019. 2 Jason A. Seth, City Clerk AGENDA ITEM #7. e) RESOLUTION NO. APPROVED BY THE MAYOR this day of 12019. Approved as to form: Shane Moloney, City Attorney RES:1801:1/18/19:scr W Denis Law, Mayor AGENDA ITEM #7. e) RESOLUTION NO. EXHIBIT A PAGE 7 OF THE ADOPTION AGREEMENT CONTAINED WITHIN THE 457(b) DEFERRED COMPENSATION PLAN (C) [ ] Direct transfers from the Plan may not be made. 17. Transfers to Purchase Service Credits (Section 8.2) (Select one) If selected below, a Participant may request a transfer from this Plan to a defined benefit governmental plan to purchase service credit. [ X ] Yes, apply. [ ] No, do not apply. 18. Rollover Contributions (Section 3.10) (Select one) Note: An Eligible Governmental 457(b) Deferred Compensation Plan cannot accept rollovers of after-tax funds from another plan. If Roth Elective Deferrals are elected, an Eligible Governmental 457(b) Deferred Compensation Plan can accept rollovers of Roth Elective Deferrals from another Eligible Governmental 457(b) Deferred Compensation Plan, or as otherwise permitted under the Code. (A) [ ] Rollovers to the Plan, including rollovers of Roth Elective Deferrals, are permitted to the extent permitted by law. (B) [ ] Rollovers to the Plan, excluding rollovers of Roth Elective Deferrals, are permitted to the extent permitted by law. (C) [ ] Rollovers to the Plan are not permitted. 19.In-Service Distribution at Age 70'/z (Section 5.1(a)) (Select one) If selected below, a Participant may receive a distribution of all or a portion of his or her benefit upon attainment of age 70 '/2 prior to Severance from Employment. [ X ] Yes, apply. [ ] No, do not apply. 20. Unforeseeable Emergency (Section 5.5) (Select one) If selected below, a Participant may receive a distribution due to Unforeseeable Emergency prior to Severance from Employment. (A) [ X ] Yes, apply. If "Yes" is selected, please select who will be making the determination approving an Unforeseeable Emergency: 7 TIAA-CREF Financial Services Governmental 457(b) Deferred Compensation Plan Adoption Agreement 6/2013 AGENDA ITEM #7. AB - 2312 C[TY OF -----wwwo�Renton uOo�" SUBJECT/TITLE: 2019-2020 CIRCA Business Cards and Business Passport Products Agreement RECOMMENDED ACTION: Refer to Transportation (Aviation) Committee DEPARTMENT: Transportation Systems Division STAFF CONTACT: Dan Hasty, Transportation Planner EXT.: 7217 The total expenditure required is $126,352 and the total amount budgeted is $130,000 (003.000000.016.595.92.43.005). The ORCA Business Passport Program is a core element of the City's Commute Trip Reduction (CTR) Program for eligible City employees. This contract will continue Renton's participation in all elements until February 28, 2020. The ORCA Business Passport Program allows employers to buy annual passes in bulk at an extreme discount over the retail pricing. Included in the ORCA Business Passport Program are: 1. Unlimited rides by card holders on bus, light rail and commuter rail services provided by King County Metro, Pierce Transit, Sound Transit and others. 2. 100% vanpool and vanshare subsidies. 3. Guaranteed Ride Home Program for all registered participants which provides a free taxi ride home in the event of an emergency or illness up to 8 times per year. The adopted budget for this program in 2019 is $130,000. A. Issue Paper B. Agreement Authorize the Mayor and City Clerk to execute the agreement with King County Metro Transit for the purchase of ORCA Business Cards and ORCA Business Passport Products. AGEI PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT M E M O R A N D U M DATE: January 16, 2019 TO: Don Persson, Council President Members of Renton City Council VIA: Denis Law, Mayor FROM: Gregg Zimmerman, Public Works Administrator, ext. 7311 STAFF CONTACT: Dan Hasty, Transportation Planner, ext. 7217 SUBJECT: 2019-2020 ORCA Business Cards and Business Passport Products Agreement ISSUE: Should Council authorize the Mayor and City Clerk to execute the agreement with King County Metro Transit for the purchase of ORCA Business Cards and ORCA Business Passport Products? RECOMMENDATION: Authorize the Mayor and City Clerk to execute the agreement with King County Metro Transit for the purchase of ORCA Business Cards and ORCA Business Passport Products. BACKGROUND: In order to reduce congestion and improve air quality, Washington State passed a Commute Trip Reduction (CTR) Law in the early 1990s. The CTR law requires employers with 100 or more employees arriving to work between the hours of 6:00 and 9:00 a.m. to have transportation programs for their employees that encourage the use of alternatives to single occupancy vehicles. Under the CTR law the City of Renton is classified as a CTR affected employer. During the past 20 years the City has entered into annual agreements with transit agencies to purchase public transit passes in bulk at a reduced rate. These passes are provided to each regular City employee as a core fundamental piece of the City's CTR Program. This program is paid for out of the general fund. #7. 0 AGENDA ITEM #7. 0 Don Persson, Council President Members of Renton City Council Page 2 of 2 January 16, 2019 The ORCA Business Passport offers unlimited rides on Sound Transit, King County Metro Transit, Pierce Transit and others. It covers travel on buses, light rail and commuter rail. In addition it features 100% subsidies for vanpool and vanshare participants of King County Metro, Community, Kitsap and Pierce transit vehicles, as well as a Guaranteed Ride Home Program (free emergency taxi service for employees). The cost for the time period of March 1, 2019 to February 28, 2020 is $419.00 per eligible employee. This is a significant savings over buying the passes through King County Metro Transit outside of the ORCA Business Passport Program. If passes were purchased in lesser quantities each equivalent pass could cost as much as $2,484. Additionally these passes would not include other benefits of the ORCA Business Passport Program, such as Guaranteed Ride Home or the 100% vanpool and vanshare subsidies. This agreement allows for the purchase of 298 passes for use by eligible City employees for a total cost of $126,352.00. The number of passes being purchased in 2019 is an increase from the 281 purchased in 2018. cc: Jan Hawn, Administrative Services Administrator Ellen Bradley-Mak, Human Resources Risk Management Administrator Jim Seitz, Transportation Systems Director Vangie Garcia, Transportation Planning and Programming Manager Marc Gordon, Finance Analyst Pat Miller, Local 2170 AFSCME Union President Kelsey Marshall, Transportation Administrative Secretary I AGENDA ITEM #7. 0 rcaa Agreement for Purchase of ORCA Business Cards and ORCA Business Passport Products THIS AGREEMENT (hereinafter, "Agreement') is made and entered into by and among City of Renton ("Business Account') and King County Metro Transit ("Lead Agency") on behalf of any of the following agencies (collectively referred to as the "Agency" or "Agencies"). The Snohomish County Public Transportation Benefit Area ("Community Transit") The City of Everett ("Everett Transit") King County Department of Transportation, Metro Transit Division ("King County") The Kitsap County Public Transportation Benefit Area ("Kitsap Transit") The Pierce County Public Transportation Benefit Area Corporation ("Pierce Transit") The Central Puget Sound Regional Transit Authority ("Sound Transit") The State of Washington acting through the Washington State Department of Transportation, Washington State Ferries Division ("WSF") IN CONSIDERATION of the mutual covenants contained herein, the sufficiency of which is hereby acknowledged, the Parties agree as follows: 1.0 PURPOSE 1.1 This Agreement establishes the terms under which certain fare payment -related services, referred to herein as "ORCA Services," will be provided to the Business Account, including but not limited to the prices and terms under which the Business Account may purchase and distribute ORCA Business Cards loaded with a Business Passport Product to its Eligible Business Cardholders. Such ORCA Business Cards may be used to access certain Transportation Services of the Agencies. The specific ridership privileges applicable to the Business Passport Product provided under this Agreement are specified in Attachment 1, Products, Pricing and Terms, which is incorporated in this Agreement by this reference, and are subject to Sections 6 and 17 below. 1.2 Attachment 1 also establishes the terms under which specific optional products and services (e.g. use of an ORCA Business Card on vanpool; a guaranteed ride home program), if any, shall be provided by one or more individual Agencies. 1.3 This Agreement also enables the Business Account to purchase Business Choice Products from the Agencies, via the Business Account Website, at the prices and terms in effect at the time of purchase. 1.4 The Business Account understands and agrees that this Agreement applies to its use of ORCA Services including, but not limited to, its purchase of ORCA Business Cards and ORCA Products. This Agreement does not constitute a contract for transportation services. The Agencies have no obligation to the Business Account or any other entity or person to provide any particular level, frequency or routing of transportation service. 2.0 TERM OF AGREEMENT AND CONTACT PERSONS 2.1 This Agreement shall take effect upon the effective date specified in Attachment 1. Unless terminated in accordance with Section 13, this Agreement shall expire on the last day of the Program Term specified in Attachment 1, or an Amended Attachment 1 that has been signed by a person authorized to bind the Business Account. ORCA Passport Agreement City of Renton - BAID: 2480 Page 1 of 21 March 1, 2019 - February 29, 2020 AGENDA ITEM #7. 0 2.2 The Business Account shall designate a Primary Contact Person in Attachment 2, Designated Representatives, which is incorporated in this Agreement by this reference. This Primary Contact Person shall be responsible for managing the Business Account's roles and responsibilities under this Agreement. A Secondary Contact Person shall also be designated in Attachment 2. The Lead Agency may communicate with and rely upon either the Primary or Secondary Contact Person on matters relating to this Agreement. 3.0 DEFINITIONS 3.1 Business Account. The employer, educational or human services institution, government agency or other entity that has entered into this Agreement enabling it to purchase ORCA Business Cards and ORCA Products for distribution to their employees, students, clients or other constituency. 3.2 Business Account Website. The website used by the Business Account to manage its account, currently at orcacard.biz. 3.3 Business Choice Products. The ORCA Products that may be purchased at retail prices to supplement the ORCA Business Passport Product for one or more Business Cardholders (e.g. a WSF monthly pass) 3.4 Business Cardholder(s) or Cardholder(s). The individual(s) who are eligible to receive an ORCA Business Card from the Business Account. The eligibility requirements for Business Cardholders are more fully defined in Attachment 3, Eligible Business Cardholders, which is incorporated in this Agreement by this reference. 3.5 Business Passport Product. The ORCA Product loaded on the Business Account's ORCA Business Cards under this Agreement that provides the Business Cardholders an unlimited right -to -ride the regularly scheduled Transportation Services of, or operated by, certain Agencies to the extent specified in Attachment 1. 3.6 Card Block. An ORCA system process that culminates in invalidating an ORCA Business Card. 3.7 Lead Agency. The Agency that entered into this Agreement on behalf of itself and the other Agencies and that is responsible for administration of this Agreement on behalf of the Agencies, including invoicing, contract modifications and renewals, and ORCA system support. 3.8 ORCA. The trademarked name of the system that enables use of a common fare card on the public transportation services provided by any of the Agencies. 3.9 ORCA Business Card (or "Business Card'). An ORCA fare card issued to a Business Account to enable the loading of ORCA Products for use by a Cardholder to whom it was distributed by the Business Account to access Transportation Services as specified in Attachment 1. 3.10 ORCA Products. Any transit fare payment mechanism or electronic voucher offered for sale within the ORCA system by any of the Agencies. Examples include, but are not limited to, monthly or period pass, E-purse, and electronic voucher. 3.11 ORCA Services. The materials and services that may be provided, from time to time, under the ORCA program, including but not limited to the ORCA Business Cards, ORCA Products, ORCA Websites, data, information, and any equipment, systems and services related to the ORCA program. 3.12 Parties. The Business Account and the Agencies (which include the Lead Agency) may be collectively referred to as "Parties." 3.13 Primary Contact Person. The individuals identified as the primary contact points for the Lead Agency and the Business Account, as listed in Attachment 2 or as modified from time to time. ORCA Passport Agreement City of Renton - BAID: 2480 Page 2 of 21 March 1, 2019 - February 29, 2020 AGENDA ITEM #7. 3.14 Product Block. An ORCA system process that culminates in invalidating an ORCA Product without invalidating the card on which it is loaded. 3.15 Transportation Services. Those public transportation services provided by the Agencies that are specified in Attachment 1. 4.0 PRICES AND PAYMENT TERMS 4.1 The prices and payment terms applicable to this Agreement are specified in Attachment 1. Such terms shall include: (a) the amounts due for the Business Cards, Business Passport Product, and any other products, services and fees; (b) the timing of payments, and (c) the acceptable method of payment. Each order submitted by the Business Account for ORCA Business Cards and/or any ORCA Products will be subject to the provisions of this Agreement. 4.2 The Business Account's purchase of any Business Choice Products via the Business Account Website will be at the prices and terms in effect at the time of order. The Business Account is responsible for reviewing the prices in effect before submitting each order and shall be deemed to have agreed to the then -applicable prices by submitting the order. 4.3 Payment in full is due as specified in Attachment 1. 4.4 If for any reason payment in full is not received by the date due, if a payment is not honored due to non -sufficient funds (NSF) or if for any reason a payment is negated or reversed, the Lead Agency will notify the Business Account of the payment problem and, if full and clear payment is not received within ten (10) calendar days of such notification, the Lead Agency may: 4.4.1 refuse to process new orders for ORCA Business Cards and block the loading of new ORCA Products by or for the Business Account; 4.4.2 assess any late payment, NSF and collection fees to the maximum amount permitted by law; 4.4.3 initiate a Card Block or Product Block on the Business Cards issued to the Business Account, rendering them ineffective for use by the Cardholders, until such time as the Business Account pays the full amount due, including any late payment, NSF and fees, in a manner acceptable to the Lead Agency; and 4.4.4 suspend or terminate access rights to the Business Account's secured area of the website. 4.5 In addition to any other obligations it may have under this Agreement and at law, the Business Account agrees to pay to the Lead Agency any reasonable collection fees incurred in collecting amounts due from the Business Account. 5.0 PURCHASE, OWNERSHIP, DISTRIBUTION AND REPLACEMENT OF ORCA BUSINESS CARDS 5.1 Ordering ORCA Business Cards. The Business Account shall order ORCA Business Cards via the ORCA Business Accounts Website, in accordance with the directions provided on that website, and shall make payment as provided in Attachment 1,. If additional cards are required, the Business Account may be required to pay the standard card fee and other applicable fees as specified in Attachment 1. 5.2 Receipt and Ownership of ORCA Business Cards. Upon actual or constructive receipt of the ORCA Business Cards it has ordered, the Business Account shall become the owner of the ORCA Business Cards. The Business Account shall be deemed to have constructively received all ordered ORCA Business Cards unless it notifies the Lead Agency of any non -delivery or incorrect delivery within thirty (30) days after the order was placed. If the ORCA Passport Agreement City of Renton - BAID: 2480 Page 3 of 21 March 1, 2019 - February 29, 2020 AGENDA ITEM #7. Business Account notifies the Lead Agency that it has not received the ordered cards, the Lead Agency will ship a replacement order. If the Business Account subsequently receives the cards reported as missing, the Business Account is responsible for returning them to the Lead Agency. 5.3 Storage and Risk of Loss. The Business Account is responsible for the storage, distribution and use of the ORCA Business Cards issued to it. The Business Account bears the sole risk of any loss, damage, theft or unauthorized use of one of its cards, whether such card is held in its inventory or has been distributed for use. The Business Account is responsible for the cost of any use of its Business Cards until the effective date of a Card Block that may be initiated as provided below. 5.4 Distance Based Transit Fare. The Business Account is responsible for communicating to Cardholders that "distance based fares" are charged on some systems such as: Link light rail, and Sounder commuter rail systems. On distance based fare modes, when the Cardholder "taps on," the ORCA system will record the trip to the last stop on the line. When the Cardholder "taps off' at the end of the ride, ORCA will record the actual ride. The Business Account then will be charged the correct fare for the actual ride taken. If the Cardholder fails to "tap off', then ORCA will record a ride to the end of the line. The result of not "tapping off' is that the Business Account will be charged the largest fare for the ride even if a shorter ride was taken. 5.5 Distribution of ORCA Business Cards. The Business Account is responsible for distributing its Business Cards for use by its Eligible Business Cardholders. The Business Account remains the owner of all Business Cards it distributes but a cardholder may also purchase and load individual ORCA products on a Business Card and individually register the card. To enable Cardholders to register Business Cards as provided in Section 6 below, the Business Account may not register, or allow anyone other than the Cardholder to register, the Business Cards that are issued under this Agreement. The Business Account shall require that the Cardholder, as a condition of receiving a Business Card, is informed of the Cardholder Rules of Use, incorporated in this Agreement as Attachment 4 ORCA Business Cardholder Rules of Use, through your business' standard means of communicating policies. The Business Account understands and agrees that it is solely responsible for implementation and enforcement of the Cardholder Rules of Use. 5.6 Proof of payment. The Business Account is responsible for notifying Cardholders that proof of payment must be made by tapping the ORCA Card on the card reader in the manner required by each Agency; otherwise, the Cardholder may be subject to a fine if the ORCA Card is not tapped, and the Cardholder will be personally responsible for any fines that may be imposed. 5.7 Business Account Access to Personally Identifying Information. If an individual Cardholder opts to register one of the Business Cards issued to the Business Account, any personally identifying information provided to the ORCA System (e.g. name, address, telephone number, and credit card number) will not be accessible by the Business Account. If the Business Account collects any personally identifying information about individuals to whom it has distributed Business Cards, the Business Account is solely responsible for its collection, use, storage and disclosure of such information. 5.8 Card Blocks. In the event a Business Card is determined to be lost or stolen or if a Cardholder is determined by the Business Account to be no longer eligible to use the card, the Business Account may initiate a Card Block via the Business Account Website to invalidate the subject Business Card. The Lead Agency may also initiate a Card Block or a Product Block as to any of the Business Account's Business Cards at the request of the Business Account, or at the sole discretion of the Lead Agency in accordance with Section 4.4, or if it is suspected that a card has been altered, duplicated, counterfeited, stolen or used by an ineligible Cardholder. Once initiated, a Card Block must be processed in the ORCA system and downloaded to all reader devices throughout the region. Until that occurs, there is ORCA Passport Agreement City of Renton - BAID: 2480 Page 4 of 21 March 1, 2019 - February 29, 2020 AGENDA ITEM #7. the potential that the Business Passport Product and any E-purse value or other ORCA Products on the subject card will continue to be used. The Business Account, not the Agencies, remains responsible for all transactions, and any loss or costs arising there from, for forty-eight (48) hours after the Card Block was initiated. 5.9 Restoration of Value After Card Block. Following a Card Block, the Business Account may request the Lead Agency to restore value on a replacement of the blocked Business Card. An E-purse on a blocked card will be restored on the replacement card in approximately ten (10) calendar days after the replacement card is issued. The E-purse amount that remained on the lost or stolen card, forty-eight (48) hours after the Card Block was initiated in the ORCA system, will be restored to the replacement card via a remote revalue function. An E-purse on a blocked card will be restored on the replacement card on the eighth day after the card has been issued. The card must then be tapped to activate the E-purse value. 5.10 Card Replacement. The Business Account is responsible for ordering and paying for any new cards needed to replace Business Cards that for any reason cease to be available or suitable for use by the Cardholders under the program of the Business Account, including but not limited to, if the unavailability or unsuitability is caused by damage, abuse, loss, theft, Card Block, and end of useful life. Provided, however, and notwithstanding the exclusion of warranties in Section 14, if a Business Card malfunctions within twelve (12) months after it was delivered to the Business Account, it shall be replaced by the Lead Agency without additional charge to the Business Account if the malfunction was caused by a defect in design, material or workmanship and was not caused by misuse, an intentional act, negligence or damage, reasonable wear and tear excepted. The Business Account understands and agrees that to avoid the disruption and inconvenience caused by sporadic failures as its cards are used, it must plan for replacement of its Business Cards on a regular basis. As a condition of continuing under the Business Passport program, the Business Account agrees that: (a) it will retire all of its ORCA Business Cards at sometime within four years after they are issued by the Lead Agency to the Business Account; and (b) purchase replacement Business Cards at the then -applicable rate. 6.0 CARDHOLDER USE OF ORCA BUSINESS CARDS Cardholder Privileges. The Business Account understands and agrees that, although it remains the owner of ORCA Business Cards after distribution, the Cardholder has the following privileges in connection with the use of an ORCA Business Card. 6.1 The Cardholder may present an ORCA Business Card, loaded with a valid, applicable Business Passport or Business Choice Product, to an ORCA fare transaction processor as proof of payment of all or a portion of a required fare on a regular transportation service operated by one or more of the Agencies. (Provided, however, an ORCA Product that is not sufficient to fully pay a fare will not be accepted as partial payment by the Washington State Ferries.) In all cases, a Cardholder will be required to make other payment to the extent a fare is not covered by an ORCA Product. 6.2 The Cardholder may individually purchase ORCA Products and load them on the Business Card in addition to any ORCA Product loaded by the Business Account. Individual ORCA Products may be used to pay all or a portion of a required fare on a transportation service not covered by a Business Passport Product or Business Choice Product. (Provided, however, an ORCA Product that is not sufficient to fully pay a fare will not be accepted as partial payment by the Washington State Ferries.) In all cases, a Cardholder will be required to make other payment to the extent a fare is not covered by an ORCA Product. 6.3 The Cardholder may register his/her name and other contact information with the ORCA System and link such personal information to the serial number of the Business Card provided to him/her. Such registration does not give the Cardholder any ownership rights in the card but does give the Cardholder the right to access the ORCA Cardholder Website to view the card's transaction history and current stored value, to modify travel zone preferences, and to add retail products. ORCA Passport Agreement City of Renton - BAID: 2480 Page 5 of 21 March 1, 2019 - February 29, 2020 AGENDA ITEM #7. 6.4 The Cardholder's personally identifying information is generally exempt from disclosure under the Washington Public Records Act (Chapter 42.56 RCW) as more specifically outlined in RCW 42.56.330(5). 7.0 NO RETURNS OR REFUNDS Except as otherwise provided herein or in Section 13.2, the Business Account understands and agrees that its purchases of Business Cards, and Business Passport Products and Business Choice Products purchased for such cards, are final and it is not entitled to any refunds. Provided, however, the Business Account may request a refund of the E-purse value remaining on a Business Card if the card is surrendered by the Business Account to the Lead Agency. Upon surrender of the subject Business Card, the Lead Agency shall initiate a Card Block and the refund processed approximately ten (10) calendar days after the Card Block was initiated. The E-purse amount refunded will be that which remained on the surrendered card forty-eight (48) hours after the Card Block was initiated in the ORCA system. A processing fee of ten dollars ($10) may be payable by the Business Account to the Lead Agency for each refund that is processed, regardless of E-purse value or number of cards refunded. The Business Account, not the Lead Agency, is responsible for the refunding of such E-purse value, if any, to the individual Cardholder to whom the Business Card had been distributed. 8.0 BUSINESS ACCOUNT WEBSITE 8.1 The Business Account Website is the primary means by which the Business Account shall purchase ORCA Business Cards, Business Passport and Business Choice Products, manage its Business Cards and obtain information about the use of said cards. As a condition of participation in the Business Passport program, the Business Account agrees that it will use the Business Account Website when it is available and that each access and use of said website shall be subject to the Terms of Use and Privacy Statement that are in effect and posted on the Business Account Website at the time of such access and use. 8.2 The Business Account understands and agrees that uninterrupted access to and use of the Business Account Website is not guaranteed and agrees that it will contact its representative at the Lead Agency by email or telephone if the website is not available. 8.3 At the time the Business Account enters into the ORCA program, the Lead Agency will provide a single password to the Business Account's Primary Contact, as specified in Attachment 2, to enable user access to the Business Account's secured area of the Business Account Website. The Business Account is required to change the temporary password to one of its own creation. The Business Account shall be solely responsible for the number and identity of those employees with whom the Business Account's password is shared. The Business Account is also solely responsible for complying with the security standards specified in Attachment 5, ORCA Business Account Security Standards, which is incorporated in this Agreement by this reference. 9.0 INFORMATION PROVIDED BY THE AGENCIES AND THE ORCA SYSTEM 9.1 The Business Account understands and agrees that the data, reports or any information provided to it via the Business Account Website or otherwise, is and remains the sole property of the Agencies and nothing shall be construed as a transfer or grant of any copyright or other property interest in such data, reports or information. The Agencies hereby grant to the Business Account a non-exclusive license to use any data, reports or information provided by the Agencies, via the Business Account Website or otherwise, for any lawful purpose related to the administration of the transportation benefits program of the Business Account. 9.2 The ORCA System will record data each time an ORCA Business Card is presented to an ORCA device for fare payment and to load a product. Such transaction data includes, but is not limited to, the date, time, and location (or route) of the transaction. The Business Account may routinely access such transaction data related to its Business Cards to the extent provided via the Business Account Website. Said website and its reports do not provide the Business Account Business Card transaction data linked to card serial numbers. ORCA Passport Agreement City of Renton - BAID: 2480 Page 6 of 21 March 1, 2019 - February 29, 2020 AGENDA ITEM #7. 0 For the purpose of preventing fraud, the Primary Contact Person of the Business Account may submit a written request to the Lead Agency for transaction data related to a specific card number or for a card number linked to a specific transaction. Fraud is defined as intentional deception or misrepresentation by a person with knowledge that it will result in an unauthorized benefit to him, her, or some other person. The submittal is not intended to be used to request data for multiple cards or all cards managed by the Business Account. The written request shall include the following: 9.2.1 Card number or the date, time and other known details about the specific transaction for which a card serial number is being requested; 9.2.2 Detailed statement as to why the information is germane to the prevention of fraud; and 9.2.3 The signature of the Primary Contact Person. If the Lead Agency determines that the subject transaction(s) is linked to a Business Card issued to the Business Account, the Lead Agency will provide the Business Account with the card serial number linked to the requested transaction(s). The Business Account agrees that it will use such card serial number information only for purposes of enforcing the Rules of Use, as provided to the Cardholder. The Business Account must maintain its own records if it wishes to identify the card serial number issued to an individual. 10.0 PUBLIC RECORDS The Business Account understands and agrees that all records related to its participation in the ORCA System are public records under the Washington Public Records Act (Chapter 42.56 RCW) ("Act"), including but not limited to: (a) this Agreement and the sales activity hereunder; (b) the orders, communications, and any other information provided by the Business Account to the Lead Agency, the other Agencies or the ORCA System, whether provided via this website or otherwise and whether provided in hard copy or electronic form; (c) any communications, responses, requests, reports or information of any kind provided to the Business Account from the Lead Agency, the other Agencies or the ORCA System; and (d) all data, reports and information of any kind related to the loading of products on, and the use of, the Business Cards issued to the Business Account. As public records, these records will be made available for public inspection and copying upon request, unless the Lead Agency determines they are exempt from disclosure. 11.0 INDIVIDUAL USE OF BUSINESS CARD AFTER LEAVING A BUSINESS ACCOUNT The Business Account is encouraged to collect Business Cards from Cardholders who are no longer eligible for the Business Account's transportation benefits program. In any case, the Business Account is solely responsible for initiating a Card Block or Product Block in accordance with this Agreement to prevent any continued use of, and financial liability for, a card that had been distributed to a person who is no longer eligible. 12.0 ORCA SERVICES SUBJECT TO CHANGE The Agencies seek to continually improve and enhance the ORCA Services. With thousands of employers, schools, and other entities entering into business account agreements at varying dates in the year, the Agencies are unable to guarantee to each business account that the ORCA Services will not change during the term of its agreement. The Business Account understands and agrees that one or more ORCA Services may be changed, suspended or terminated from time to time without prior notice to, or agreement by, the Business Account, including but not limited to changes in the look, feel, content and functions of the Business Account Website. If the Business Account is dissatisfied with a change in the ORCA Services, however, it may terminate this Agreement for its convenience in accordance with the provisions of Section 13.2. 13.0 TERMINATION ORCA Passport Agreement City of Renton - BAID: 2480 Page 7 of 21 March 1, 2019 - February 29, 2020 AGENDA ITEM #7. 0 13.1 The Lead Agency may at any time terminate this Agreement if the Business Account fails to make timely and effective payment of all amounts due, or otherwise materially breaches the Agreement, or acts in manner indicating that it intends to not comply, or is unable to comply, with the Agreement. To effect such a termination for cause, the Lead Agency shall send email notice to the last known email address for the last known primary contact person of the Business Account describing the manner in which the Business Account is in default and the effective date of termination. If the basis for termination is a failure to perform that can be cured, the termination shall not take effect so long as the Business Account cures the default within ten (10) calendar days of the sending of the email notice. Upon the effective date of such termination, the Lead Agency may immediately terminate the website access privileges of the Business Account, block the Business Cards issued to the Business Account and decline to accept and fulfill any pending or new orders from the Business Account. In the event of such a termination for cause, the Business Account shall not be entitled to any refund of any amounts paid. 13.2 Either the Business Account or the Lead Agency may terminate the Agreement without cause and for its own convenience by sending the other party written or email notice at least thirty (30) days in advance of the effective date of the termination. Upon receipt of a notice of termination for convenience from the Business Account, the Lead Agency may, in its sole discretion, waive the advance notice period and immediately terminate the website access privileges of the Business Account, initiate a Card Block on the Business Cards issued to the Business Account, and decline to accept and fulfill any pending or new orders from the Business Account. In the event of such a termination for convenience and not cause, the amounts due under this Agreement shall be calculated by the Lead Agency. (The amounts due for the ORCA Passport Product and any optional products listed in Attachment 1 shall be the annual amounts due prorated for the number of months during which the Passport Product and optional products were valid for at least one day.) If the Business Account has not paid in full all of the amounts due under this Agreement as of the termination date, the Business Account shall immediately pay the remaining amount due. If the Business Account has paid more than all of the amounts due under this Agreement as of the termination date, the Business Account shall be entitled to a refund of the excess it has paid. 13.3 Notwithstanding any termination of the Agreement, the Business Account shall remain liable to satisfy and comply with all of its obligations under this Agreement and at law with regard to, or arising out of, any orders submitted or any of its acts or omissions occurring prior to the effective date of the termination, including but not limited to paying all amounts due or incurred prior to the effective date of the termination and any fees, charges, collection costs or other costs arising from a failure to make timely and effective payment. 14.0 EXCLUSION OF WARRANTIES 14.1 ALL ORCA SERVICES PROVIDED ARE PROVIDED ON AN "AS IS" AND "AS AVAILABLE" BASIS. ANY USE OF THE ORCA SERVICES IS AT THE BUSINESS ACCOUNT'S SOLE DISCRETION AND RISK. 14.2 BYWAY OF EXAMPLE, AND NOT LIMITATION, THE LEAD AGENCY AND EACH OF THE OTHER AGENCIES SPECIFICALLY DO NOT REPRESENT AND WARRANT THAT: A. THE BUSINESS ACCOUNT'S USE OF THE ORCA SERVICES WILL BE UNINTERRUPTED, TIMELY, FREE FROM ERROR AND OTHERWISE MEETING ITS REQUIREMENTS; B. ANY INFORMATION OBTAINED BY THE BUSINESS ACCOUNT AS A RESULT OF USING THE ORCA SERVICES WILL BE ACCURATE AND RELIABLE; AND C. ANY USE OF THE ORCA WEBSITES, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO THE CONTENT OR MATERIAL DOWNLOADED FROM SAID WEBSITES, WILL BE FREE OF DEFECTS, VIRUSES, MALWARE, HACKS OR POTENTIALLY HARMFUL INTRUSIONS. 14.3 TO THE EXTENT PERMITTED BYLAW, THE LEAD AGENCY AND EACH OF THE OTHER AGENCIES DISCLAIMS ALL WARRANTIES OF ANY KIND, EXPRESS OR IMPLIED, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO: ANY IMPLIED WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE; ANY ORCA Passport Agreement City of Renton - BAID: 2480 Page 8 of 21 March 1, 2019 - February 29, 2020 AGENDA ITEM #7. WARRANTIES OF QUIET ENJOYMENT OR NON -INFRINGEMENT; AND ANY WARRANTIES CREATED BY TRADE USAGE, COURSE OF DEALING, OR COURSE OF PERFORMANCE. 14.4 NO ADVICE OR INFORMATION, WHETHER ORAL OR WRITTEN, OBTAINED FROM THE AGENCIES OR THE ORCA SYSTEM SHALL REVISE OR CREATE ANY WARRANTY. 15.0 NOTICES 15.1 Any notice required to be given under the terms of this Agreement shall be directed either by email or regular mail to the Parties' Designated Representatives, as specified in Attachment 2, or to the last person and address provided by a Party in accordance with Section 15.2. 15.2 Each Party shall immediately notify the other Parties of any changes to its Designated Representatives' contact information. The Business Account shall also immediately notify the Lead Agency of any changes in any other information provided in its application. 16.0 FORCE MAJEURE The Agencies and each of them shall be relieved of any obligations under this Agreement to the extent they are rendered unable to perform, or comply with such obligations as a direct or indirect result of a force majeure event, or any other circumstance not within such party's control, including, but not limited to, acts of nature, acts of civil or military authorities, terrorism, fire or water damage, accidents, labor disputes or actions, shutdowns for purpose of emergency repairs, or industrial, civil or public disturbances. 17.0 APPLICATION OF AGENCY FARES AND OTHER POLICIES The purchase, distribution and use of Business Cards and ORCA Products by the Business Account and its Cardholders, and access to and use of the ORCA websites, shall be subject to all applicable federal, state and local law, regulations, ordinances, codes and policies, including but not limited to the ORCA Terms of Use and Privacy Statement (posted on the ORCA websites and available in printed form upon request to the Lead Agency), and the Agencies' respective fares, transfer rules, codes of conduct and other operating policies and procedures. 18.0 PROHIBITED DISCRIMINATION The Business Account shall not discriminate on the basis of race, color, sex, religion, nationality, creed, marital status, sexual orientation, age, or presence of any sensory, mental, or physical handicap in the administration of its transportation benefits program, the provision of ORCA Business Cards and ORCA Products, or the performance of any acts under this Agreement. The Business Account shall comply fully with all applicable federal, state and local laws, ordinances, executive orders and regulations which prohibit such discrimination. 19.0 COMPLIANCE WITH APPLICABLE LAW The Business Account shall be solely responsible for compliance with all applicable federal, state and local laws, regulations, resolutions and ordinances, including, but not limited to, any provisions relating to the Business Account's provision of compensation, benefits or services to employees or others (e.g. including, but not limited to, transportation fringe benefits) and any reporting, tax withholding, or other obligations related thereto. The Business Account expressly acknowledges and agrees that it has not relied on any representations or statements by the Agencies and will not rely on them to provide any legal, accounting, tax or other advice with regard to the Business Account's provision of compensation, benefits or services to employees or others (e.g. including, but not limited to, transportation fringe benefits) and any reporting, withholding or other obligations related thereto. 20.0 LEGAL RELATIONS ORCA Passport Agreement City of Renton - BAID: 2480 Page 9 of 21 March 1, 2019 - February 29, 2020 AGENDA ITEM #7. 0 20.1 No Partnership, Agency or Employment Relationship Formed. The Business Account and the Agencies are independent parties and nothing in this Agreement shall be construed as creating any joint venture, partnership, agency or employment relationship between and among them or their respective employees. Without limiting the foregoing, the Business Account understands and agrees that none of its employees or agents shall be deemed employees or agent, for any purpose, of any of the Agencies and the Business Account is solely responsible for the acts of its agents and employees and their compensation, wages, withholdings and benefits. 20.2 LIMITATION ON LIABILITY A. THE LEAD AGENCY AND EACH OF THE OTHER AGENCIES SHALL NOT BE LIABLE FOR, AND THE BUSINESS ACCOUNT HOLDS EACH AGENCY HARMLESS FROM, ANY LOSS OR DAMAGE ARISING OUT OF OR RELATED TO: 1. ANY RELIANCE PLACED BY THE BUSINESS ACCOUNT ON THE COMPLETENESS, ACCURACY OR EXISTENCE OF ANY INFORMATION PROVIDED TO THE BUSINESS ACCOUNT BY OR THROUGH THE ORCA SERVICES; 2. ANY CHANGES TO THE ORCA SERVICES OR THE TEMPORARY OR PERMANENT CESSATION OF ANY SUCH SERVICES (OR FEATURES WITHIN A SERVICE); 3. THE DELETION OF, CORRUPTION OF, OR FAILURE TO STORE, ANY INFORMATION MADE AVAILABLE TO THE BUSINESS ACCOUNT, OR GENERATED BY THE USE OF THE ORCA SERVICES UNDER THIS AGREEMENT INCLUDING, BUT NOT LIMITED TO, THE USE OF THE ORCA BUSINESS CARDS ISSUED UNDER THIS AGREEMENT; 4. THE BUSINESS ACCOUNT'S FAILURE TO PROVIDE THE LEAD AGENCY WITH ACCURATE ACCOUNT INFORMATION; AND 5. THE BUSINESS ACCOUNT'S FAILURE TO KEEP INFORMATION SECURE AND CONFIDENTIAL. B. THE LEAD AGENCY AND EACH OF THE OTHER AGENCIES SHALL NOT BE LIABLE FOR, AND THE BUSINESS ACCOUNT HOLDS EACH AGENCY HARMLESS FROM, ANY INDIRECT, INCIDENTAL, SPECIAL, CONSEQUENTIAL, OR EXEMPLARY DAMAGES INCURRED BY THE BUSINESS ACCOUNT UNDER ANY THEORY OF LIAIBILITY, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO LOSS OF USE, LOSS OF TIME, LOSS OF PROFITS, LOSS OF PRIVACY, LOSS OF DATA, LOSS OF GOODWILL OR BUSINESS REPUTATION, WHEN SUCH DAMAGES ARISE OUT OF, OR ARE RELATED TO, THIS AGREEMENT OR THE ORCA SERVICES, WHETHER OR NOT ONE OR MORE AGENCIES HAS BEEN ADVISED OF, OR SHOULD HAVE BEEN AWARE OF, THE POSSIBILITY OF ANY SUCH DAMAGES ARISING. C TO THE EXTENT ONE OR MORE OF THE AGENCIES INCURS ANY LIABILITY FOR A BREACH OF THIS AGREEMENT, OR ANY DUTY RELATED TO THE ORCA SERVICES, AND SUCH LIABILITY THAT IS NOT EXCLUDED UNDER THE TERMS OF THIS AGREEMENT, THE EXCLUSIVE, AGGREGATE REMEDY AGAINST THE LEAD AGENCY AND EACH OTHER AGENCY WILL BE, AT THE OPTION OF THE APPLICABLE AGENCIES: (A) THE CORRECTION, SUBSTITUTION OR REPLACEMENT OF ALL OR PART OF THE ORCA SERVICES GIVING RISE TO THE BREACH, OR (B) A REFUND OF THE AMOUNT PAID BY THE BUSINESS ACCOUNT FOR THE ORCA SERVICE CAUSING THE DAMAGE, THE AMOUNT OF WHICH WILL NOT EXCEED THE DAMAGES (OTHER THAN THOSE EXCLUDED ABOVE) ACTUALLY INCURRED BY THE BUSINESS ACCOUNT IN REASONABLE RELIANCE. THE DAMAGE EXCLUSIONS AND LIMITATIONS ON LIABILITY IN THE AGREEMENT SHALL APPLY EVEN IF ANY REMEDY FAILS FOR ITS ESSENTIAL PURPOSE. ORCA Passport Agreement City of Renton - BAID: 2480 Page 10 of 21 March 1, 2019 - February 29, 2020 AGENDA ITEM #7. 20.3 No Waiver. The Business Account agrees that if the Lead Agency does not exercise or enforce any legal right or remedy which is contained in the Agreement or under applicable law, this will not be taken to be deemed to be a waiver or modification of the Lead Agency's rights and remedies, and that those rights or remedies will still be available to the Lead Agency. 20.4 Governing Law and Forum. This Agreement and all provisions hereof shall be interpreted and enforced in accordance with, and governed by, the applicable law of the State of Washington and of the United States of America without regard to its conflict of laws provisions. The exclusive jurisdiction and venue for conducting any legal actions arising under this Agreement shall reside in either the Federal District Court or the State of Washington Superior Court, as applicable, that is located in the county in which the Lead Agency's primary administrative office is located. The Business Account hereby consents to personal jurisdiction and venue in said courts and waives any right which it might have to conduct legal actions involving the Agencies in other forums. 20.5 Attorneys' Fees and Costs. In the event of litigation between the parties related to this Agreement, the Court is authorized to award the substantially prevailing party its costs, fees and expenses including reasonable attorney fees to the extent authorized by the Court and permitted by applicable law. 20.6 Survival. Sections 4, 5, 9, 14 and 20 shall survive and remain effective notwithstanding any termination of this Agreement. 20.7 Use of ORCA name and logos. The Business Account understands and agrees that the "ORCA" name and logos are trademarked and that it will not copy or use them and any other trade names, trademarks, service marks, logos, domain names, and other distinctive features or intellectual property of the Agencies without written permission. The Agencies understand and agree the Business Account name and logo may be trademarked and that it will not copy or use them and any other trade names, trademarks, service marks, logos, domain names, and other distinctive features or intellectual property of the Business Account without written permission. 21.0 SUCCESSORS AND ASSIGNS This Agreement and all terms, provisions, conditions and covenants hereof shall be binding upon the parties hereto, and their respective successors and assigns; provided, however, no Party may assign or delegate the duties performed under this Agreement without the written agreement by the Lead Agency, the Business Account and the assignee. 22.0 ENTIRE AGREEMENT AND WRITTEN AMENDMENTS This Agreement constitutes the entire agreement between the Business Account and the Lead Agency, on behalf of all Agencies, related to the Business Account's use of and access to ORCA Services (but excluding any services which Lead Agency may provide under a separate written agreement), and completely replaces and supersedes any prior oral or written representations or agreements in relation to fare media consignment and sales or to ORCA Services. No oral agreements or modifications will be binding on the parties and any changes shall be effective only upon a written amendment being signed by the parties. 23.0 SEVERABILITY In the event any provision of this Agreement is determined by a court of competent jurisdiction to be unenforceable or invalid, then the meaning of that provision shall be construed, to the extent feasible, to render the provision enforceable, and if no feasible interpretation would save such provision, it shall be severed from the remainder of the Agreement which shall remain in full force and effect unless the provisions that are invalid and unenforceable substantially impair the value of the entire Agreement to any party. 24.0 AUTHORITY TO EXECUTE ORCA Passport Agreement City of Renton - BAID: 2480 Page 11 of 21 March 1, 2019 - February 29, 2020 AGENDA ITEM #7. 0 Each party to this Agreement represents and warrants that: (i) it has the legal power and authority to execute and perform this Agreement and to grant the rights and assume its obligations herein; and (ii) the person(s) executing this Agreement below on the party's behalf is/are duly authorized to do so, and that the signatures of such person(s) is/are legally sufficient to bind the party hereunder. 25.0 COUNTERPARTS This Agreement may be executed in two (2) counterparts, each one of which shall be regarded for all purposes as one original. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto, by their duly authorized representatives, have executed this Agreement as of the Effective Date. BUSINESS ACCOUNT LEAD AGENCY City of Renton BY: BY: Denis Law Christi Masi Mayor Program Manager DATE: DATE: ORCA Passport Agreement City of Renton - BAID: 2480 Page 12 of 21 March 1, 2019 - February 29, 2020 AGENDA ITEM #7. Attachment 1 PRODUCTS, PRICING AND TERMS — BUSINESS PASSPORT FLAT RATE Business Account: City of Renton Business Account Federal Tax ID #: 91-6001271 ORCA Business ID#: 2480 Agreement Type: Renewal Contract Program Term:March 01, 2019 - February 29, 2020 Business Passoort Flat Rate Products • Valid for full fare and unlimited rides on: o Regular bus services on Community Transit, Everett Transit, Kitsap Transit, Metro Transit, Pierce Transit, and Sound Transit • Regular service on Sound Transit Link light rail Regular service on Sound Transit Sounder commuter rail (including Rail Plus partnership with Amtrak Cascades) o Regular service on Seattle Streetcar o Regular service on King County Water Taxi (Vashon and West Seattle routes). • Regular service on Kitsap Local Ferries and Kitsap Fast Ferries. • Access Transportation service on Kitsap Transit and Metro Transit (Access -eligible riders only) • 100% vanpool fare subsidy on Community Transit, Kitsap Transit, Metro Transit, and Pierce Transit vanpool vans. • 100% vanshare fare subsidy on Community Transit, Kitsap Transit, Metro Transit and Pierce Transit vanshare vans. • Emergency guaranteed ride home service. (Up to eight rides per employee.) (See Attachment 6.) Passport Zone and Worksite Location Employees Annual Rate per Employee Cost King County Suburbs 298 $419.00 $124,862.00 1055 S Grady Way, Renton, WA 98057 New Card(s) 298 X $5.00 $1,490.00 Total 298 $126,352.00 Business Passport Flat Rate Payment Terms • Net 60 days from start of program term • Payment due per the above terms. Invoice will be sent by King County Finance. Additional Information Additional Card Orders During the agreement term additional cards can be ordered at the standard card fee only. Amount of Eligible Employee contribution (Note: employees may contribute up to 50% of the Annual Rate per Employee) 1055 S Grady Way, Renton, WA 98057 1=1 $0 Business Choice Products Choice Products purchased by the Business Account will be prepaid by check or credit card, at prevailing retail rates. ORCA Passport Agreement City of Renton - BAID: 2480 Page 13 of 21 March 1, 2019 - February 29, 2020 AGENDA ITEM #7. 0 Attachment 2 DESIGNATED REPRESENTATIVES BUSINESS ACCOUNT - Primary LEAD AGENCY - Primary Name John Dan Hasty Roland Bautista Title Transportation Planner Customer Services Coordinator Business Name City of Renton Address 1055 S Grady Way Renton City Hall-5th Flr 201 S Jackson St, KSC-TR-0326 Renton, WA 98057 Seattle, WA 98104 Telephone (425) 430-7217 (206) 477-5782 E-Mail jhasty@rentonwa.gov roland.bautista@kingcounty.gov BUSINESS ACCOUNT - Secondary LEAD AGENCY - Technical Support Name Denis Law Lead Agency Representative Title Mayor Business Name City of Renton Address 1055 S Grady Way Renton City Hall-5th Flr 201 S Jackson St, KSC-TR-0326 Renton, WA 98057 Seattle, WA 98104 Telephone (425) 430-6500 (206) 477-3700 E-Mail dlaw@rentonwa.gov business.leadagent@kingcounty.gov BILLING INFORMATION Name John Dan Hasty Title Transportation Planner Business Name City of Renton Address 1055 S Grady Way Renton City Hall-5th Flr Renton, WA 98057 Telephone (425) 430-7217 E-Mail jhasty@rentonwa.gov ORCA Passport Agreement City of Renton - BAID: 2480 Page 14 of 21 March 1, 2019 - February 29, 2020 AGENDA ITEM #7. 0 Attachment 3 ELIGIBLE BUSINESS CARDHOLDERS Definition and Number of Eligible Participants Definition of Eligible All benefit -eligible employees: Participants 1055 S Grady Way, Renton, WA 98057 Number of Eligible 298 Participants ORCA Passport Agreement City of Renton - BAID: 2480 Page 15 of 21 March 1, 2019 - February 29, 2020 AGENDA ITEM #7. 0 Attachment 4 ORCA BUSINESS CARDHOLDER RULES OF USE As a Business Account Cardholder, I agree to the following: 1. I understand that the ORCA Business Card is owned by the employer that provided it to me and it has been provided to me for my personal use only. I agree that I will not sell or transfer my assigned ORCA Card to another person. If I violate these terms of use, my ORCA Card may be blocked from further use. 2. 1 will keep my assigned ORCA Business Card secure and in good condition, and I will immediately report a lost, stolen, or damaged ORCA Business Card to my company's Transportation Coordinator. I understand an ORCA Business Card will be replaced at the fee charged by my company. 3. 1 will return my assigned ORCA Business Card upon request or when I leave my employment or otherwise do not meet the eligibility requirements of my company. If I do not return my ORCA Business Card, I understand that it may be blocked for further use. 4. 1 understand that my ORCA Business Card is valid for the following provided by the listed transportation Agencies. a. 100% of fares on regularly scheduled transportation service on Community Transit, Everett Transit, Kitsap Transit and Kitsap Ferries, King County Water Taxi, Metro Transit, Pierce Transit, Sound Transit, and Seattle Streetcar. b. 100% of vanpool and vanshare fares on vanpool services provided by Community Transit, Kitsap Transit, Metro Transit, and Pierce Transit. 5. 1 understand and will comply with policies of my employer or other institution that provided my ORCA Business Card. 6. 1 understand that the ORCA Business Card is not valid for fare payment on transportation services not specified in Section 4 and I am responsible for paying any additional fares required for services not covered, or not fully covered, by my assigned ORCA Business Card. 7. 1 understand that any additional ORCA Products I load onto my assigned ORCA Card will become the property of the company that owns my ORCA Business Card and the refund, if any, of such products will be made by the company according to its refund policy. 8. 1 understand in the event any ORCA Products I load onto my assigned ORCA Card must be replaced, I am responsible for any fares required during the replacement period. 9. 1 understand the ORCA system will record data each time I use my assigned ORCA Business Card. Data will include the date, time and location of the card when it is presented. I understand this data is owned by the transit Agencies and is accessible to the company that owns my ORCA Business Card. 10. 1 understand that the ORCA Card must be "tapped" on a card reader to show proof of fare payment or issuance of a valid fare. Merely showing the ORCA Card on a bus, train, ferry or light rail vehicle does not constitute proof of fare payment or issuance of a valid fare. I will be subject to a fine if the ORCA Card is not "tapped," and I understand I will be personally responsible for any fines that may be imposed. 11. 1 understand that for the correct fare to be recorded, I must "tap" off on a card reader when exiting some transit systems. For example, I must "tap" off when exiting from a Sounder train or Link light rail. ORCA Passport Agreement City of Renton - BAID: 2480 Page 16 of 21 March 1, 2019 - February 29, 2020 AGENDA ITEM #7. 1 acknowledge the receipt of my ORCA Business Card, and understand and agree to the terms stated above on using the ORCA Business Card. Employee's Signature / Date Employee's Printed Name / Date Transportation Coordinator Use Only — ORCA Card returned: Employee's Signature / Date ORCA Card Serial# ORCA Passport Agreement City of Renton - BAID: 2480 Page 17 of 21 March 1, 2019 - February 29, 2020 AGENDA ITEM #7. Attachment 5 ORCA BUSINESS ACCOUNT SECURITY STANDARDS 1.0 Application Security 1.1 At the time the Business Account enters into the ORCA program, the Lead Agency will provide a single Business Account user id and temporary password to the Business Account's Primary Contact (as specified in Attachment 2, Designated Representatives, to enable access to the Business Account's area of the Business Account Website. 1.2 The Business Account shall immediately change the temporary password to a strong password that meets the following criteria: a. Length - At least eight (8) characters in length or the maximum length permitted by the ORCA system, whichever is shorter. b. Elements - Contains one each of at least three (3) of the following four (4) elements: 1. English upper case letters (A, B, C...) 2. English lower case letters (a, b, c... ) 3. Westernized Arabic numbers: 0, 1, 2...9 4. Special characters: (@, #, %... ) 1.3 The Business Account shall restrict access to the ORCA Business Account Website by providing its user id and password to only the employee(s) who have a business "need to know" and who are authorized by the Business Account as "system user(s)". 1.4 Access to the ORCA Business Account Website is restricted to the purpose of authorized administrative support for the ORCA Business Account program 1.5 The Business Account's password shall be changed at least quarterly but also immediately upon (a) a system user leaving the Business Account's employment or otherwise losing his/her status as an authorized user; and (b) the Business Account learning that the password has been obtained by unauthorized persons or entities. 1.6 The Business Account's Primary Contact will review security policies and guidelines with system users at least quarterly. 2.0 Physical Security 2.1 The Business Account shall require system users, when not at their workstations, to log off the Business Account Website, or lock their screen using a password protected screen -saver in order to prevent unauthorized access. 2.2 ORCA card stock shall be kept in a secure/locked location with access limited to those administering the program. 2.3 The Business Account shall require its employees to keep printed reports containing account information in a secure location. 3.0 Incident Management 3.1 The Business Account shall report any security incident or suspected incident immediately to the Lead Agency. Examples of possible security incidents would be: introduction of computer viruses, unauthorized transactions or blocked cards, or lost or stolen card stock. ORCA Passport Agreement City of Renton - BAID: 2480 Page 18 of 21 March 1, 2019 - February 29, 2020 AGENDA ITEM #7. 0 Attachment 6 HOME FREE GUARANTEE PROGRAM Home Free Guarantee (hereinafter, "HFG") is a King County program that guarantees payment for taxi fares incurred by Eligible Employees who meet the eligible criteria, as set forth below, and taken in accordance with the terms set forth below. HFG is the emergency guaranteed ride home service mentioned in Attachment 1 of the ORCA Business Passport Agreement. 1.0 DEFINITIONS 1.1 Approved Commute Modes Eligible Employees must have commuted from their principal residence, transit center, or park & ride lot to the Business Account's worksite by one of the following modes: bus, train, carpool, vanpool, walk-on or bicycle -on ferry, bicycle, or walk. 1.2 Eligible Reasons For Using HFG The following are eligible reasons for using HFG: a. Eligible Employee's or family member's unexpected illness or emergency. b. Unexpected schedule change such that the normal commute mode is not available for the return commute to the starting place of their commute. Unexpected means the employee learns of the schedule change that day. c. Missing the employee's normal return commute to the starting place of their commute for reasons, other than weather or acts of nature which are beyond the employee's control, and of which they had no prior knowledge. For example, the employee's carpool driver left work or worked late unexpectedly. 1.3 Non -Eligible Reasons For Using HFG Reasons which are not eligible for HFG use include, but are not limited to, the following: a. Pre -scheduled medical or other appointments. b. To transport individuals who have incurred injury or illness related to their occupation. An HFG ride should NEVER be used where an ambulance is appropriate, nor should an HFG ride replace Business Account's legal responsibility under workers' compensation laws and regulations. c. Employee termination or reductions in force. d. Other situations where, in the opinion of the Business Account's Program Coordinator, alternate transportation could have been arranged ahead of time. 1.4 Eligible Destinations For An HFG Ride a. From the Business Account's worksite to the Eligible Employee's principal place of residence. b. From the Business Account's worksite to the Eligible Employee's personal vehicle, e.g. vehicle located at a transit center or park & ride lot. c. From the Business Account's worksite to the Eligible Employee's usual commute ferry terminal on the east side of Puget Sound. 1.5 Intermediate Stops Intermediate stops are permitted only if they are of an emergency nature and are requested in advance by the Eligible Employee and are authorized in advance of the HFG ride by the Business Account's Program Coordinator (i.e. pick up a necessary prescription at a pharmacy; pick up a sick child at school). 2.0 BUSINESS ACCOUNT RESPONSIBILITIES 2.1 HFG Program Payment ORCA Passport Agreement City of Renton - BAID: 2480 Page 19 of 21 March 1, 2019 - February 29, 2020 AGENDA ITEM #7. Business Account's payment for HFG services is accounted for in the base price of the ORCA Business Passport Agreement, as indicated in Attachment 1. 2.2 Program Coordinator Business Account shall designate as many Program Coordinators as necessary to administer and perform the necessary HFG program tasks as set forth in this Attachment. 2.3 Number Of HFG Rides Per Eligible Employee Business Account shall ensure that each Eligible Employee does not exceed eight (8) HFG rides per twelve (12) month period. 2.4 Access to Service Business Account shall make information about how to access HFG rides available to all Eligible Employees. 3.0 HFG PROGRAM TASKS 3.1 Process To access HFG rides, Eligible Employees shall contact the Program Coordinator. The Program Coordinator shall call directly an answering service provider, contracted for by King County. The phone number is 425-450-4555. Program Coordinator shall screen and obtain the following information from the Eligible Employee, and provide the information to the answering service provider as part of arranging the taxi ride for the Eligible Employee. a. Verify the Eligible Employee has commuted to the worksite by an eligible mode. b. Verify the Eligible Employee has an eligible reason and eligible destination for an HFG ride. 3.2 Reporting a. Once an Eligible Employee takes the emergency taxi ride, obtain from the Eligible Employee a completed receipt of the taxi trip. b. Business Account's Program Coordinator shall forward copies of such receipts to King County at the end of each month for record keeping and accounting purposes. 4.0 KING COUNTY RESPONSIBILITIES 4.1 Participating Taxi Business Account(s) Business Account agrees that neither King County nor answering service provider is responsible for providing transportation services under the HFG program. Business Account further agrees that King County makes no guarantee or warranty as to the availability, quality or reliability of taxi service, and that King County's sole obligation under the program is to make payment of the taxi provider for trips actually taken in accordance with the terms of this Agreement. Business Account agrees it shall make no claims of any kind or bring any suits of any kind against King County for damages or injuries of any kind arising out of or in any way related to the HFG program. Without limiting the foregoing and by way of example only, the Business Account agrees that King County shall not be liable for any injuries or damages caused by negligence or intentional acts occurring before, during or after a taxi ride or for any injuries or damages caused by failure of a taxi to provide a ride due to negligence, intentional acts or causes beyond the taxi's control, including but not limited to incidence of fire, flood, snow, earthquake or other acts of nature, riots, insurrection, accident, order of any court or civil authority, and strikes or other labor actions. 4.2 Payment Of Authorized HFG Taxi Fares King County shall pay the metered fare amount of a Business Account's Program Coordinator -authorized HFG ride, as defined in the DEFINITIONS section above, for a one-way distance of up to sixty (60) miles. Business Account or Eligible Employee taking the ORCA Passport Agreement City of Renton - BAID: 2480 Page 20 of 21 March 1, 2019 - February 29, 2020 AGENDA ITEM #7. HFG ride shall pay any fare for a one-way distance in excess of sixty (60) miles. King County shall not pay any taxi driver gratuity. Taxi driver gratuity will be at the sole discretion of Business Account or the Eligible Employee taking the HFG ride. 4.3 Reporting King County shall keep a complete record of all authorized HFG ride requests and provide a copy of this record to Business Account's designated Contact Person if requested. 4.4 Program Abuse King County reserves the right to investigate and recover costs from the Business Account of intentional abuse of the HFG program by Eligible Employees. Program abuse is defined as, but not limited to, taking more than the maximum eight rides per agreement period, taking trips for inappropriate reasons, unauthorized destinations and intermediate stops, and pre -scheduled appointments not defined in the DEFINITIONS section above. ORCA Passport Agreement City of Renton - BAID: 2480 Page 21 of 21 March 1, 2019 - February 29, 2020 AGENDA ITEM #7. g) AB - 2310 CITY OF enton SUBJECT/TITLE: RECOMMENDED ACTION: DEPARTMENT: STAFF CONTACT: EXT.: The Title VI Plan has no fiscal impact. Adoption of a Title VI Plan Refer to Transportation (Aviation) Committee Transportation Systems Division Heather Gregersen, Program Development Coordinator 7393 The City must comply with Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 and various non-discrimination laws and regulations in order to receive federal financial assistance. The Washington State Department of Transportation (WSDOT) administers the state's Title VI Plan and is required to obtain assurances from sub recipients of their compliance. Each local agency that receives federal funds through WSDOT is required to establish a Title VI Plan to ensure that the provision of benefits and services, and transportation decision making are conducted in a non- discriminatory manner. This Title VI Plan includes a requirement for local agencies to submit a plan specifying how it will implement their Title VI responsibilities. Agencies serving a population of 100,000 or more are required to have a Title VI Plan. Agencies serving a population less than 100,000 are able to use an abbreviated Title VI Plan Non-discrimination Agreement. The City's current population has exceeded the 100,000 person threshold and an updated plan document is required to be adopted and submitted to WSDOT. Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 prohibits discrimination based on race, color and national origin in the provision of benefits and services receiving federal financial assistance. The Civil Rights Restoration Act of 1987 clarified the broad institution -wide application of Title VI and other non-discrimination statues. The term "program or activity' means all of the operations of federal aid recipients, sub recipients and contractors, regardless of whether or not such programs and activities are federally funded. The Local Agency Guidelines Manual require local agencies to address environmental justice and limited English proficiency in their Title VI Plan. A. Title VI Plan B. WSDOT Local Agency Guidelines Title VI Program Chapter 28 C. Resolution Adopt the resolution and authorize the Mayor and City Clerk to execute the Title VI Plan. AGENDA ITEM #7. g) ,6 City of Renton TITLE VI PLAN City of Renton Federally Funded Transportation Program City of Renton Title VI Plan AGENDA ITEM #7. g) Table of Contents I. Policy Statement, Authorities and Citations.....................................................................3 II. Organization, Staffing and Structure.............................................................................4 III. Title VI Plan Implementation and Program Administration.........................................5 IV. NHI Education and Title VI Training...........................................................................7 V. Complaint Procedures — Allegations of Discrimination in Federally Assisted Programsor Activities.............................................................................................................8 VI. Sub -Recipient Review and Remedial Action Procedures...........................................10 A. Title VI Review of Sub -recipients of Federal -Aid Highway Funds ...........................10 B. Post -Grant Reviews.....................................................................................................11 C. Remedial Action..........................................................................................................11 VII. Title VI Implementation Activities in Special Emphasis Program Areas...................I I A. Planning & Location Activities...................................................................................I I B. Consultant Contracts Activities...................................................................................12 C. Design & Engineering / Environmental Activities......................................................13 D. Right-of-way Activities...............................................................................................14 E. Construction Activities...............................................................................................15 City of Renton Title VI Plan 2 AGENDA ITEM #7. g) I. Policy Statement, Authorities and Citations A. Policy of Nondiscrimination The City of Renton assures that no person shall on the grounds of race, color, national origin, or sex as provided by Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, and the Civil Rights Restoration Act of 1987 (P.L. 100.259) be excluded from participation in, be denied the benefits of, or be otherwise subjected to discrimination under any City sponsored program or activity. The City of Renton further assures every effort will be made to ensure nondiscrimination in all of its programs and activities, whether those programs and activities are federally funded or not. In the event the City of Renton distributes Federal aid funds to another entity, the City will include Title VI language in all written agreements and will monitor for compliance. Title VI compliance is a condition of receipt for Federal funds. Assurance of compliance, therefore, falls under the proper authority of the Mayor pursuant to its budgetary authority and responsibility. The Mayor, Public Works Administrator and Title VI Coordinator are authorized to ensure compliance with provisions of this policy and with the law, including the requirements of 23 Code of Federal Regulation (CFR) 200 and 49 CFR 21. Mayor Public Works Administrator Date Date Transportation Director & Transportation Title VI Coordinator Date B. Authorities Title VI of the 1964 Civil Rights Act provides that no person in the United States shall on the grounds of race, color, national origin, or sex be excluded from participation in, be denied the benefits of, or be otherwise subjected to discrimination under any program or activity receiving Federal financial assistance. The Civil Rights Restoration Act of 1987 broadened the scope of Title VI coverage by expanding the definition of terms "programs or activities" to include all programs or activities of Federal Aid recipients, sub -recipients, and contractors, whether such programs and activities are Federally assisted or not (Public Law 100-259 [S. 557] March 22, 1988). City of Renton Title VI Plan 3 AGENDA ITEM #7. g) Limited English Proficiency — Executive Order 13166 clarifies that individuals with Limited English Proficiency (LEP) are protected under the title VI nondiscrimination provisions related to national origin, and requires Federal Aid recipients, sub -recipients and contractors to take reasonable steps to provide meaningful access to programs, services and entities. These reasonable steps may include providing information, services and materials in languages other than English. Environmental Justice — Executive Order 12898 clarifies that Title VI requires Federal aid recipients, sub -recipients and contractors to conduct an equity assessment to ensure full and fair participation of minority and low-income communities and avoid disproportionately high or adverse human and environmental impacts from transportation projects. This Plan is created in coordination with the Washington State Transportation in its capacity of administrating the distribution of Federal Highway Administration dollars. The Policy is intended to apply primarily to programs funded by such dollars. Other departments, sections, and divisions of the City of Renton that receive non -highway federal funding may be bound to and/or follow different policies and procedures in order to comply with the above authorities and applicable requirements of the agencies responsible for distributing such federal funding. C. Additional Citations Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964; 42 USC 2000d to 2000d-4; 42 USC 4601 to 4655; 23 USC 109(h); 23 USC 324; DOT Order 1050.2; EO 12250; EO 12898; 28 CFR 50.3 u. Organization, Staffing and Structure A. Organizational Chart (See Appendix 4) B. Staffing and Structure Citv Administrator The Mayor is authorized to ensure compliance with provisions of the City's policy of non- discrimination and with the law, including the requirements of 23 CFR Part 200 and 49 CFR Part 21. The City's grants compliance function and Title VI coordination shall be performed under the authority of the Mayor. Title VI Coordinator The City of Renton has designated the position of Transportation Director to perform the duties of the Transportation Title VI Coordinator and ensure implementation of the City's Title VI Federally Funded Transportation Program. The Transportation Director has other duties and responsibilities in addition to Title VI. Although the Transportation Director is directly supervised by the Public Works Administrator, this position shall have an indirect reporting relationship and access to the Mayor. City of Renton Title VI Plan 4 AGENDA ITEM #7. g) Title VI Specialists Additionally, the Transportation Division has designated Title VI Specialists (Specialists) in Transportation Division's emphasis areas. The Specialists, designated below, shall work in concert with the Title VI Coordinator. These areas are subject to receiving Federal assistance through grants or other types of transportation related funding. The Specialists will work with the Coordinator to ensure their respective sections comply with Title VI regulations and assurances, meet the objectives of the Title VI Plan, meet Federal and state reporting requirements, and provide adequate training opportunities for applicable staff. Title VI Specialists will work with the Coordinator to ascertain Title VI compliance by contractors, subcontractors, consultants, suppliers and other sub -recipients under Transportation's Federally funded projects or programs. Specialists will ensure applicable Title VI provisions and requirements are included in contractual agreements to prime contractors and sub -recipients. Specialists will work with the Coordinator to obtain statistical data on race, color, national origin, handicap/disability, and sex of participants in, and beneficiaries of Federally funded City of Renton transportation programs. Each of the Specialists will maintain data relative to their respective special emphasis area, designated below. The Coordinator shall use the data to complete annual Title VI reports and for other administrative needs. Title VI Specialists - Emphasis Area and Job Title Transportation Design Design Manager Transportation Operations Operations Manager Transportation Planning Planning Manager Transportation Maintenance Maintenance Manager Transportation Administration Program Development Coordinator American with Disabilities Liaison Transportation Planner III. Title VI Plan Implementation and Program Administration Title VI Coordinator's Responsibilities and Program Administration As authorized by the Mayor, the Title VI Coordinator is responsible for initiating, monitoring, and ensuring the City of Renton's Transportation Division compliance with Title VI requirements as follows: A. Program Administration. Administer the Title VI program and coordinate implementation of the plan. Ensure compliance with the assurances, policy, and program objectives. Perform Title VI program reviews to assess administrative procedures, staffing, and resources; provide recommendations as required to the Public Works Administrator. B. Complaints. Review written Title VI complaints that may be received by the Transportation Division following the adopted procedural guidelines (see Section V — Complaint Procedures). Ensure City of Renton Title VI Plan 5 AGENDA ITEM #7. g) every effort is made to resolve complaints informally at the local or regional level. C. Data Collection. Review the statistical data gathering process performed by Title VI Specialists periodically to ensure sufficiency of data for meeting the requirements of Title VI program administration. (See Section VII - Special Emphasis Program Areas). D. Environmental Impact Statements. Ensure that available census data are included as a part of all Environmental Impact Statements/Assessments (EIS/EIA) conducted by the Transportation Division for projects receiving Federal Highway Administration or other Federal assistance. E. Training Programs. Conduct or facilitate training programs on Title VI issues and regulations for Transportation Division employees; and facilitate Title VI training for appropriate staff, contractors and sub - recipients. F. Title VI Plan Update. Review and update the City of Renton's Transportation Title VI Plan as needed or required. Present updated plan to the Public Works Administrator; submit amended Plan to WSDOT. G. Annual Accomplishment Report. Prepare an annual report of Title VI accomplishments and changes to the program in the preceding Federal fiscal year; identify goals and objectives for the upcoming year as required; and submit to WSDOT in a timely manner. H. Public Dissemination. Work to develop and disseminate Title VI program information to the Transportation Division staff and other City of Renton employees and sub -recipients, including contractors, subcontractors, consultants, and sub -consultants and beneficiaries, as well as the general public. Public dissemination may include Title VI language in contracts or other agreements, website postings, and annual publication of the City's Title VI Policy Statement in newspaper(s) having a general circulation. Ensure public service announcements or notices of proposed projects, hearings, meetings, or formation of public advisory boards, are posted in newspapers or other media reaching the affected community. Ensure the full utilization of available minority publications or media; and, where appropriate, provide written or verbal information in languages other than English. I. Elimination of Discrimination. Work with the City Attorney Department, Human Resources Department, and other City offices to establish procedures for promptly resolving deficiencies, as needed. Recommend procedures to identify and eliminate discrimination that may be discovered in any Transportation Division processes. J. Maintain Legislative and Procedural Information. City of Renton Title VI Plan 6 AGENDA ITEM #7. g) Federal laws, rules and regulations, WSDOT guidelines, the current City of Renton Title VI Plan, Annual Accomplishment Reports, and other resource information pertaining to the implementation and administration of the City's Title VI program will be maintained and updated by the Coordinator. Information will be made available to other City departments or the public as requested or required. IV. NHI Education and Title VI Training In keeping with adopted City of Renton policy of nondiscrimination, procedures will be established or followed for Transportation employees to have equal access to applicable educational and training opportunities. Transportation staff will maintain program administration documentation and data necessary for preparation of annual Title VI reports, and will routinely supply the necessary data to the Title VI Coordinator. A. National Highway Institute (NHI) Education The Coordinator will be notified when training for the National Highway Institute courses or workshops become available to City of Renton Transportation employees. The Transportation Director will establish a policy for the selection of participants interested in taking part in the National Highway Institute Training workshops to ensure that no one is denied participation or subjected to discrimination on the basis of race, color, national origin or sex. A report will be completed and forwarded to the Coordinator upon completion of each educational seminar or course throughout the course of the year, which shall include the name of each participant, their title, division, sex and ethnicity for use in completing the annual Title VI accomplishment report. B. Title VI Training The Transportation Title VI Coordinator is responsible for overall Title VI related training and staff development for Title VI Specialists and other City of Renton employees. The Coordinator will organize and facilitate the provision of Title VI training sessions for consultants, contractors, and subcontractors periodically. WSDOT's Office of Equal Opportunity Internal and External Civil Rights Branch and the Contract Compliance Office may be asked to provide applicable training. C. Selection of Instructors The Coordinator will collaborate with the City of Renton's Contracting Services to ensure City policy is followed in the selection of instructors for City of Renton Transportation training courses/ workshops, and ensure equal opportunity in the selection process for all training contracts. Per adopted policy, the City will provide accessibility to Minority/Women/Disadvantage Business Enterprise consulting and training firms to compete for training contracts. City of Renton Title VI Plan 7 AGENDA ITEM #7. g) V. Complaint Procedures — Allegations of Discrimination in Federally Assisted Programs or Activities A. Overview These procedures cover all complaints filed under Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 as amended, Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, Civil Rights Restoration Act of 1987, and the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990, relating to any program or activity administered by the City of Renton Transportation Division, as well as to sub -recipients, consultants, and contractors. These procedures apply to complaints filed against a program and/or activity funded by the Federal Highway Administration (FHWA). Intimidation or retaliation of any kind is prohibited by law. The procedures do not deny the right of the complainant to file formal complaints with other state or Federal agencies or to seek private counsel for complaints alleging discrimination. These procedures are part of an administrative process, which do not provide for remedies that include punitive damages or compensatory remuneration for the complainant. Every effort will be made to resolve complaints informally at the City and sub -recipient level. The option of informal mediation meeting(s) between the affected parties and a designated mediator may be utilized for resolution. B. Procedures Any individual, group of individuals, or entity that believes they have been subjected to discrimination prohibited by Title VI nondiscrimination provisions may file a written complaint with the Human Resources Department at the City of Renton. A formal complaint must be filed within 180 calendar days of the alleged occurrence. Complaint forms are available through the City's website or by contacting the Title VI Coordinator. The City will not officially act or respond to complaints made verbally. Allegations received by telephone will be reduced to writing and provided to the complainant for confirmation or revision before processing. A complaint form will be forwarded to the complainant for him/her to complete, sign, and return to the City of Renton for processing. 1. In order to be accepted, a complaint must meet the following criteria: • The allegation(s) must involve a covered basis such as race, color, national origin, gender, disability, or retaliation. • The allegation(s) must involve a program or activity of a Federal -aid recipient, sub -recipient, or contractor, or, in the case of ADA allegations, an entity open to the public. • The complaint must include the date of the alleged act of discrimination (date when the complainant(s) became aware of the alleged discrimination; or the latest instance of the conduct). City of Renton Title VI Plan 8 AGENDA ITEM #7. g) • The complaint must present a detailed description of the issues, including names and job titles of those individuals perceived as parties in the complained -of incident. The complainant(s) must accept reasonable resolution based on the City of Renton's administrative authority (reasonability to the determined by the City of Renton). 2. Upon receiving the written complaint, Human Resources, in consultation with the Title VI Coordinator will determine its jurisdiction, acceptability, need for additional information, and the investigative merit of the complaint. 3. If the complaint is against the City, the City will request the Washington State Department of Transportation (WSDOT) Office of Equal Opportunity to conduct the investigation. In the event WSDOT handles the investigation, they will follow their adopted procedures for investigating discrimination complaints, per their current State Title VI Plan. 4. If a complaint is against a sub -recipient, consultant, or contractor, under contract with the City, the appropriate Department and/or Division shall be notified of the complaint within 15 calendar days. The City will determine whether it will investigate the complaint or request WSDOT to conduct the investigation. 5. Once the City or WSDOT decides to accept the complaint for investigation, the complainant and the respondent will be notified in writing of such determination within five (5) calendar days. The complaint will be logged into the records of the Title VI Coordinator, and the basis for the allegation identified including race, color, national origin, handicap/disability, age or sex. 6. In cases where the City of Renton assumes investigation of the complaint, the City will provide the respondent with the opportunity to respond to the allegations in writing. The respondent will have ten (10) calendar days upon receipt, to furnish the City with his/her response to the allegations. 7. Within 40 calendar days of acceptance of the complaint, the City of Renton or WSDOT investigator will prepare a written investigative report for the Public Works Administrator and Mayor. This preliminary investigative report shall include a narrative description of the incident, identification of persons interviewed, findings and recommendations for disposition. 8. The investigator will discuss the report and recommendations with the Public Works Administrator and Mayor. There will be a period of 10 calendar days to discuss the report and any recommendations. The report will be modified as needed and made final for its release to the parties. 9. Once the investigative report becomes final, briefings will be scheduled with each party within 15 days. Both the complainant and the respondent shall receive a copy of the City of Renton Title VI Plan 9 AGENDA ITEM #7. g) investigative report during the briefings and will be notified of their respective appeal rights. 10. A copy of the complaint and City or WSDOT investigative report will be issued to WSDOT's External Civil Rights Branch (or the appropriate oversight agency) within 60 calendar days of the acceptance of the complaint. 11. If the complainant or respondent is not satisfied with the results of the investigation of the alleged discriminatory practice(s) he or she shall be advised of their rights to appeal the decision to WSDOT, U.S. Department of Transportation or U.S. Department of Justice. The complainant has 180 calendar days after the appropriate agency's final resolution to appeal to USDOT. Unless new facts not previously considered come to light, reconsideration of the final determination by the investigating agency will not be available. 12. The Title VI Coordinator will maintain an annual Log Of Complaints, which will contain the following information for each complaint filed: • The name and address of the person filing the complaint • The date of the complaint • The basis of the complaint • The disposition of the complaint • The status of the complaint Only qualified, well -trained investigators should conduct these investigations. No agency is allowed to investigate a complaint against itself. 13. A complaint may be dismissed for the following reasons: • The complainant requests the withdrawal of the complaint. • The complainant fails to respond to repeated requests for additional information needed to process the complaint. • The complainant cannot be located after reasonable attempts. V1. Sub -Recipient Review and Remedial Action Procedures A. Title VI Review of Sub -recipients of Federal -Aid Highway Funds. Transportation Title VI Specialists and the Title VI Coordinator will assist WSDOT to periodically conduct Title VI compliance reviews. Transportation Division staff will review select recipients of Federal -aid highway or other Federal funds, to ensure adherence to Title VI requirements (see Section VII). The Title VI Coordinator will work cooperatively to periodically confirm operational guidelines provided to consultants, contractors, and sub -recipients, including Title VI language, provisions, and related requirements, as applicable. City of Renton Title VI Plan 10 AGENDA ITEM #7. g) B. Post -Grant Reviews. The Coordinator will collaborate with Transportation staff to conduct periodic post grant reviews of select recipients of Federal highway funds or other Federal funds, for roads, sidewalks, bridges, municipal construction, etc. to ensure adherence to Title VI requirements (see Section VII). Appropriate staff will periodically confirm that operational guidelines provided to consultants, contractors and sub -recipients include Title VI language and provisions and related requirements, where applicable. C. Remedial Action. When irregularities occur in the administration of Federal -aid highway programs at either the City or sub -recipient levels, corrective action will be taken to resolve identified Title VI issues. The City of Renton will seek the cooperation of the consultant, contractor or other sub -recipient in correcting deficiencies found during periodic reviews. The City will provide technical assistance and guidance, upon request, to support voluntary compliance by the sub -recipient. When conducting Title VI compliance reviews, the City will reduce to writing any recommended remedial action agreed upon by the Transportation Division and sub -recipient, and provide a copy of the letter within a period not to exceed 45 days. Sub -recipients placed in a deficiency status will be given a reasonable time, not to exceed 90 days after receipt of the deficiency letter, to voluntarily correct deficiencies. When a sub - recipient fails or refuses to voluntarily comply with requirements within the allotted time frame, the City of Renton will submit to WSDOT and FHWA copies of the case file and a recommendation that the sub -recipient be found in noncompliance. A follow-up review will be conducted within 180 days of the initial review to ascertain if the sub -recipient has complied with the Title VI Program requirements in correcting deficiencies previously identified. If the sub -recipient refuses to comply, the City of Renton and WSDOT may, with FHWA's concurrence, initiate sanctions per 49 CFR 21. VII. Title VI Implementation Activities in Special Emphasis Program Areas A. Planning & Location Activities 1. Planning Process. The Transportation Planning Section has responsibility for providing long-range planning, program development, and capital programming necessary to provide efficient transportation services to City of Renton citizens. The City annually updates and coordinates its six -year plan for transportation improvement programs and projects. The update informs other City of Renton departments and neighboring jurisdictions of the current planning direction for transportation needs. Projects included in the update are the result of evaluation and prioritization of needs in various transportation areas. The evaluation process includes input from the City Title VI Coordinator, various departments, cities, local jurisdictions and organizations, citizen groups, and private individuals. All six -year plans are consistent with the adopted Comprehensive Plan approved under the State's Growth Management Act. City of Renton Title VI Plan 11 AGENDA ITEM #7. g) 2. Authorities. Renton City Code; 23 CFR 450; RCW 35.77; RCW 36; RCW 47.06 Statewide Transportation Planning; RCW 47.80 Regional Transportation Planning Organization (RTPO). 3. Public Involvement in Planning Activities & Title VI. a) The Transportation Division will invite participation of a cross section of the populace from social, economic, and ethnic groups in the planning process by disseminating written program information to minority media and ethnic organizations, and providing public service announcements for all local media, when forming citizen advisory committees or planning boards, and requesting involvement. b) Transportation Division staff will obtain demographic statistics at applicable community meetings and public hearings involving transportation planning sessions. Data will be gathered through use of a voluntary self -reporting form which includes race, gender, and national origin. Copies of the completed forms will be provided to Title VI Coordinator after each meeting. c) To ensure access to public meetings, evening meetings will be conducted in a variety of community buildings throughout the City, including those along transit routes. Staff will ensure translation services are available if anticipated, and ensure public meetings are held in predominantly minority communities when transportation projects will specifically impact those communities. B. Consultant Contracts Activities 1. Consultant Contracts Administration. The Design Section is responsible for recommending consultant firms to support Transportation Division activities. Project Managers participate in final selection, negotiation and award. Pursuant to City of Renton Purchasing, Bidding and Contracting Policy, the signing authority of the consultant contracts may be the Public Works Administrator or the Mayor. In coordination with project managers, the Design Section Manager administers awarded consultant contracts. 2. Authorities. City of Renton Code; WSDOT Local Agency Guidelines; 48 CFR 31; 23 CFR 172 3. Consultant Selection Process. Transportation staff or project management staff will request qualifications from consulting engineering firms specializing in various aspects of civil engineering which may relate to transportation projects and the development of construction plans and special provisions for roads and bridges, design work associated with structures, performing environmental studies or preparing NEPA or SEPA documents for transportation projects. Consultant selection from the certified list maintained by the MRSC adheres to Washington State regulations (RCWs) and is consistent with City of Renton vendor policies. 4. Title VI Assurances and Provisions Transportation Division staff will: City of Renton Title VI Plan 12 AGENDA ITEM #7. g) a) Include applicable Disadvantaged Business Enterprise (DBE) goals in designated projects, and seek to proactively achieve the goal(s). b) Include Title VI assurance and provision language in all Federally funded consultant contracts. Periodically review documents and language to ensure compliance with current laws and regulations. Provide a copy of the contract to the Title VI Coordinator, and any amendments or updates that may occur over time. c) Maintain updated demographic data on the utilization of women -and minority -owned consulting firms. As they occur, a copy of the award letter will be provided to the Title VI Coordinator for use in preparing the Annual Update Accomplishment Report. C. Design & Engineering / Environmental Activities 1. Capital Improvement Projects CIP): The Design Section is responsible for implementing the Capital Improvement Program (CIP) and environmental permitting for projects. Studies are performed to assess various environmental factors as they relate to the implementation of the City's transportation capital program, including evaluating demographic data. 2. Authorities. Renton City Code; Local Agency Guidelines - WSDOT- M36-63; Standard Plans For Road, Bridge and Municipal Construction-WSDOT; APWA - M21-01; Title 23, USC 109(d), 14(a), 217, 315 and 402(a); 23 CFR 1204.4; 23 CFR 771; EO 12898; 49 CFR 1.48(b)(33) and 1.48(c)(2; National Environmental Policy Act of 1969, 42 USC 4321; 40 CFR Part 1500; 49 CFR Part 622; WSDOT EPM M31-1; EO 12898 3. Design /Environmental Review Process and Title VI Transportation Division Staff will: a) Depending on the scope, complexity, and impacts of a project, a National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA), NEPA Categorical Exclusion, NEPA Environmental Assessment, State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA) checklist, SEPA Determination of Non Significance, or NEPA and/or SEPA Environmental Impact Statement will be completed. b) Monitor compliance with Title VI requirements in all aspects of conducting Environmental Impact Statements or Assessments. Provide a comprehensive summary of the demographic and environmental data elements to be considered by the EIS/EIA process to the Title VI Coordinator; including updated summary lists as applicable. c) Incorporate into the review process adequate time for the Coordinator to review and comment, as applicable, on the draft EIS/EIA to ensure there are no violations of the Federal Civil Rights Act, as amended, as a result of the City's Federal -Aid highway activities. d) In order to ensure dissemination of information and foster participation from affected populations, place public notices in applicable general and minority media; select accessible locations and times for public hearings or meetings, and arrange for translation services as needed; particularly in projects impacting predominantly minority City of Renton Title VI Plan 13 AGENDA ITEM #7. g) communities. Ensure the public has information pertaining to their rights to call or write the department to view plans and discuss environmental problems. e) Obtain demographic data at community meetings and public hearings pertaining to the transportation design phase. Data will be gathered through use of a voluntary sign-up form which includes race, gender, and preferred language to receive information. Copies of the voluntary self -reporting forms will be provided to the Title VI Coordinator after each meeting. f) Provide a copy of the Annual Construction Report to the Title VI Coordinator in or around August of each year. The Title VI Coordinator will work with the city's GIS Section to generate a map of the Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) funded transportation projects to include demographic data of the neighborhoods effected by the projects. D. Right-of-way Activities 1. Real Property Services. The Design Section, through consultants with expertise in right-of-way acquisition, manages and coordinates the appraisal and acquisition of real property and relocation assistance services for transportation projects. The right of way acquisition process entails appraisal of property, negotiation of terms and conditions for acquisition, and assistance in the relocation of displaced individuals, businesses, farm operations, nonprofit organizations, and property management. 2. Authorities. Right of Way Manual; 23 CFR 130; 49 CFR 24; RCW Chapter 47; WAC 46 8. 100 3. Right-of-way Activities and Title VI The Design Section staff will: a) Ensure equal opportunity in all aspects of procuring real estate service contracting and appraisal agreements. Follow adopted City of Renton vendor procurement policies in the acquisition of contracted services. b) Utilize current OMWBE directories identifying fee appraiser organizations and the Washington State Department of Transportation's list of certified fee appraisers when seeking services. Maintain data on awards to minority and female appraisers, and provide data to the Title VI Coordinator on a quarterly basis. c) Follow the guidelines in the Right of Way Manual for property acquisition as well as applicable laws and regulations, including Title VI and Section 504. d) Adhere to departmental policy of apprising affected property owners, tenants, and others involved in right-of-way acquisition of their rights and options regarding negotiation, relocation, condemnation and other aspects of the acquisition process. e) Provide copies of relocation assistance literature produced by WSDOT and a copy of the City of Renton Title VI Compliance brochure to all affected parties. City of Renton Title VI Plan 14 AGENDA ITEM #7. g) f) Incorporate Title VI language in all surveys of property owners and tenants. Coordinate the preparation of deeds, permits and leases to ensure the inclusion of the appropriate clauses, including Title VI Language. g) Ensure that appraised values and communications associated with the appraisal and negotiation operations result in equitable treatment. h) Ensure comparable replacement dwellings are available and assistance is given to all displaced persons and entities by the property acquisition process. i) Maintain statistical data including race, color, national origin, and sex on all relocatees affected by Transportation Federal Highway Administration funded projects, and provide detailed demographic data quarterly to the Title VI Coordinator. E. Construction Activities 1. Construction: -Design Section. The implementation of capital improvements projects is performed by the Design Section (mentioned above). This section is also responsible for administration of all new construction contracts and inspecting bridges. The Transportation Division is responsible for oversight and the administration of transportation construction projects, as set forth by policy decisions and supervision of the Public Works Administrator. 2. Authorities. City of Renton Standards, Construction Manual M41-01; Maintenance Manual M51-01; Local Agency Guidelines; Standard Specifications for Road, Bridge, and Municipal Construction. 3. Construction Activity and Title VI Transportation Division staff will: a) Review all Federal Highway Administration funded transportation projects for application of DBE goals. As appropriate, include DBE provisions in those projects with designated goals. Include Title VI language in bid announcements and applicable construction documents, as stipulated in the City's Title VI Policy Statement (p. 2) and Assurances (Exhibit 2, p. 18-19) herein. b) Award construction contracts on the basis of lowest responsive bidder, as well as meeting DBE requirements. Include Title VI language in prime contract award letters to encourage utilization of DBE subcontracts and vendors. c) Ensure that prime contractors with DBE requirements award contracted work to qualified DBEs which perform commercially useful functions. d) Monitor all construction operations to ensure nondiscrimination throughout all operations. e) Coordinate the gathering of construction information regarding DBE participation for the Annual Title VI Report; and provide to the Coordinator. City of Renton Title VI Plan is AGENDA ITEM #7. g) City of Renton Title VI Plan 16 AGENDA ITEM #7. g) Exhibit 1 — City of Renton Title VI Notice to the Public The City of Renton hereby gives public notice that it is the City's policy to assure full compliance with Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, the Civil Rights Restoration Act of 1987, and related statutes and regulations in all programs and activities. Title VI requires that no person shall, on the grounds of race, color, sex, or national origin be excluded from the participation in, be denied the benefits of, or be otherwise subjected to discrimination under any Federal Aid Highway program or other activity for which the City of Renton receives Federal financial assistance. Any person who believes they have been aggrieved by an unlawful discriminatory practice under Title VI has a right to file a formal complaint with the City of Renton. Any such complaint must be in writing and filed with the City of Renton Human Resources within one hundred, eighty (180) days following the date of the alleged discriminatory occurrence. Title VI Discrimination Complaint Forms may be obtained from the City's website (www.rentonwa.gov) or from the Human Resources office at no cost to the complainant by calling (425) 430-7655. City of Renton Title VI Plan 17 AGENDA ITEM #7. g) Exhibit 2 — City of Renton Title VI Assurances The City of Renton in the State of Washington, (hereinafter referred to as the "Recipient"), HEREBY AGREES THAT as a condition to receiving any Federal financial assistance from the U.S. Department of Transportation will comply with Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, 78 Stat. 252, 42 USC 2000d--42 USC 2000d--4 (hereinafter referred to as the Act), and all requirements imposed by or pursuant to Title 49, Code of Federal Regulations, Department of Transportation, Subtitle A, Office of the Secretary part 21, Nondiscrimination in Federally Assisted Programs of the Department of Transportation —Effectuation of Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 (hereinafter referred to as the Regulations), and other pertinent directives, to the end that in accordance with the Act, Regulations, and other pertinent directives, no person in the United States shall, on the grounds of race, color, sex, or national origin be excluded from participation in, be denied the benefits of, or be otherwise subjected to discrimination under any program or activity for which the Recipient receives Federal financial assistance through the Washington State Department of Transportation, including the U.S. Department of Transportation and Federal Highway Administration, and HEREBY GIVES ASSURANCE THAT it will promptly take any measures necessary to effectuate this agreement. This Assurance is required by Subsection 21.7(a)( 1 ) of the Regulations. More specifically and without limiting the above general assurance, the Recipient hereby gives the following specific assurances to its Federal Aid Highway Program: 1. That the Recipient agrees that each "program" and each "facility" as defined in Subsections 21.23(e) and 21.23(b) of the Regulations, will be (with regard to a "program") conducted, or will be (with regard to a "facility") operated in compliance with all requirements imposed by, or pursuant to, the Regulations. 2. That the Recipient shall insert the following notification in all solicitations for bids for work or material subject to the Regulations made in connection with the Federal Aid Highway Program, and in adapted form in all proposals for negotiated agreements: The City of Renton, in accordance with Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 and 78 Stat. 252, 42 USC 2000d --- 42 and Title 49, Code of Federal Regulations, Department of Transportation, Subtitle A, Office of the Secretary, part 21, Nondiscrimination in Federally assisted programs of the Department of Transportation issued pursuant to such Act, hereby notifies all bidders that it will affirmatively ensure that any contract entered into pursuant to this advertisement, minority business enterprises will be afforded full opportunity to submit bids in response to this invitation and will not be discriminated against on the grounds of race, color, sex, or national origin in consideration for an award. 3. That the Recipient shall insert the clauses of Appendix 1 of this Assurance in every highway contract subject to the Act and the Regulations. 4. That the Recipient shall insert the clauses of Appendix 2 of this Assurance, as a covenant running with the land, in any deed from the United States effecting a transfer of real property, structures, or improvements thereon, or interest therein for highway purposes. City of Renton Title VI Plan 18 AGENDA ITEM #7. g) 5. That where the Recipient receives Federal financial assistance to construct a facility, or part of a facility, the Assurance shall extend to the entire facility and facilities operated in connection therewith. 6. That where the Recipient receives Federal highway financial assistance in the form, or for the acquisition of real property, or an interest in real property, the Assurance shall extend rights to space on, over or under such property. 7. That the Recipient shall include the appropriate clauses set forth in Appendix 3 of this Assurance, as a covenant running with the land, in any future deeds, leases, permits, licenses, and similar agreements entered into by the Recipient with other parties: (a) for the subsequent transfer of real property acquired or improved under the Federal Aid Highway Program; and (b) for the construction or use of or access to space on, over or under real property acquired, or improved under the Federal Aid Highway Program. 8. That this Assurance obligates the Recipient for the period during which Federal financial assistance is extended to the program, or is in the form of, personal property, or real property or interest therein or structures or improvements there on, in which case the Assurance obligates the Recipient or any transferee for the longer of the following periods: (a) the period during which the property is used for a purpose for which the Federal financial assistance is extended, or for another purpose involving the provision of similar services or benefits; or (b) the period during which the Recipient retains ownership or possession of the property. 9. The Recipient shall provide for such methods of administration for the program as are found by the Secretary of Transportation, or the official to whom s/he delegates specific authority to give reasonable guarantee that it, other recipients, sub -grantees, contractors, subcontractors, transferees, successors in interest, and other participants of Federal financial assistance under such program will comply with all requirements imposed or pursuant to the Act, the Regulations, and this Assurance. 10. The Recipient agrees that the United States has a right to seek judicial endorsement with regard to any matter arising under the Act, the Regulations, and this Assurance. THIS ASSURANCE is given in consideration of and for the purpose of obtaining any and all Federal grants, loans, contracts, property, discounts or other Federal financial assistance extended after the date hereof to the Recipient by the U.S. Department of Transportation under the Federal Aid Highway Program and is binding on it, other recipients, sub -grantees, contractors, subcontractors, transferees, successors in interest and other participants in the Federal Aid Highway Program. The person whose signature appears below is authorized to sign this Assurance on behalf of the Recipient. Mayor Public Works Administrator City of Renton Title VI Plan Date Date 19 AGENDA ITEM #7. g) Appendix 1 — Title VI Assurances For Consultants, Contractors, Subcontractors, Suppliers, and Manufacturers The City of Renton will insert or add the following clauses into every highway contract subject to the Act and Regulations associated with the receipt of Federal financial assistance: During the performance of this contract, the contractor, for itself, its assignees and successors in interest (hereinafter referred to as the "contractor") agrees as follows: 1. Compliance with Regulations. The contractor shall comply with the Regulations relative to nondiscrimination in Federally assisted programs of the Department of Transportation (hereinafter DOT), Title 49, Code of Federal Regulations, part 21, as they may be amended from time to time, (hereinafter referred to as the Regulations), which are herein incorporated by reference and made a part of this contract. 2. Nondiscrimination. The contractor, with regard to the work performed during the contract, shall not discriminate on the grounds of race, color, sex, or national origin in the selection and retention of subcontractors, including procurement of materials and leases of equipment. The contractor shall not participate either directly or indirectly in the discrimination prohibited by Section 21.5 of the Regulations, including employment practices when the contract covers a program set forth in Appendix B of the Regulations. 3. Solicitations for Subcontracts, including Procurement of Materials and Equipment. In all solicitations either by competitive bidding or negotiations made by the contractor for work to be performed under a subcontract, including procurement of materials or leases of equipment, each potential subcontractor or supplier shall be notified by the contractor of the contractor's obligations under this contract and the Regulations relative to nondiscrimination on the ground of race, color, sex, or national origin. 4. Information and Reports. The contractor shall provide all information and reports required by the Regulations or directives issued pursuant thereto, and shall permit access to its books, records, accounts, other sources of information, and its facilities as may be determined by the City of Renton or the Washington State Department of Transportation to be pertinent to ascertain compliance with such Regulations, orders and instructions. Where any information required of a contractor is in the exclusive possession of another who fails or refuses to furnish this information, the contractor shall so certify to the City of Renton, or the Washington State Department of Transportation as appropriate, and shall set forth what efforts it has made to obtain the information. 5. Sanctions for Noncompliance. In the event of the contractor's noncompliance with the nondiscrimination provisions of this contract, The City of Renton and the Washington State Department of Transportation shall City of Renton Title VI Plan 20 AGENDA ITEM #7. g) impose such contract sanctions as it, or the Federal Highway Administration may determine to be appropriate, including, but not limited to: a) Withholding of payments to the contractor under the contract until the contractor complies, and/or; b) Cancellation, termination, or suspension of the contract, in whole or in part. 6. Incorporation of Provisions. The contractor shall include the provisions of paragraphs (1) through (6) in every subcontract, including procurement of materials and leases of equipment, unless exempt by the Regulations, or directives issued pursuant thereto. The contractor shall take such action with respect to any subcontractor or procurement as the City of Renton or the U.S. Department of Transportation, Federal Highway Administration, may direct as a means of enforcing such provisions including sanctions for noncompliance. Provided, however, that in the event a contractor becomes involved in, or is threatened with, litigation with a subcontractor or supplier as a result of such direction, the contractor may request the City of Renton enter into such litigation to protect the interests of the City and, in addition, the contractor may request the United States to enter into such litigation to protect the interests of the United States. City of Renton Title VI Plan 21 AGENDA ITEM #7. g) Appendix 2 - Granting and Habendum Clauses When the City of Renton is the recipient of real property, structures or improvements thereon, or interest therein from the United States for highway purposes, the following clauses shall be included in any and all deeds affecting or recording the transfer of property: GRANTING CLAUSE NOW, THEREFORE, the City of Renton, as authorized by law, will accept title to the lands and maintain the project constructed thereon, in accordance with Title 23, United States Code, the Regulations for the Administration of Federal Aid for Highways and the policies and procedures prescribed by the Federal Highway Administration of the Department of Transportation and, also in accordance with and in compliance with all requirements imposed by or pursuant to Title 49, Code of Federal Regulations, Department of Transportation, Subtitle A, Office of the Secretary, part 21, Nondiscrimination in Federally assisted programs of the Department of Transportation (hereinafter referred to as the Regulations) pertaining to and effectuating the provisions of Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 (78 Stat. 252:42 USC 2000d to 2000d--4) does hereby remise, release, quitclaim, and convey unto the City of Renton all the right, title, and interest of the Department of Transportation in and to said land described in Exhibit A attached hereto and made a part thereof. HABENDUM CLAUSE TO HAVE AND TO HOLD said lands and interests therein unto the City of Renton, and its successors forever, subject, however, to the covenants, conditions, restrictions and reservations herein contained as follows, which will remain in effect for the period during which the real property or structures are used for a purpose for which the Federal financial assistance is extended or for another purpose involving the provision of similar services or benefits and shall be binding on the City of Renton, its successors, and assigns. The City of Renton, in consideration of the conveyance of said lands and interests in lands, does hereby covenant and agree as a covenant running with the land for itself, its successors and assigns, that (1) no person shall on the grounds of race, color, sex, or national origin be excluded from participation in, be denied the benefits of, or be otherwise subjected to discrimination with regard to any facility located wholly or in part on, over, or under such lands hereby conveyed (,) (and)' (2) that the City of Renton, shall use the lands and interests in lands so conveyed, in compliance with all requirements imposed by or pursuant to Title 49, Code of Federal Regulations, Department of Transportation, Subtitle A, Office of the Secretary, part 21, Nondiscrimination of Federally assisted programs of the Department of Transportation -- Effectuation of Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, and as said Regulations may be amended (,) and (3) that in the event of breach of any of the above mentioned nondiscrimination conditions, the City shall have a right to reenter said lands and facilities on said land, and the above described land and facilities shall thereon revert to and vest in and become the absolute property of the Department of Transportation and its assigns as such interest existed prior to this instruction. I Reverter Clause and related language to be used only when it is determined that such a clause is necessary in order to effectuate the purposes of Title VI of Civil Rights Act of 1964. City of Renton Title VI Plan 22 AGENDA ITEM #7. g) Appendix 3 - Lease/Deed Provisions Upon receipt of Federal financial assistance to construct a facility or part of a facility for highway purposes, the Recipient agrees to include these clauses in all future deeds, licenses, leases, permits, or similar instruments entered into by the City of Renton pursuant to the provisions of Title VI Assurances, item 7: The LESSEE, for himself or herself, his or her heirs, personal representatives, successors in interest, and assigns, as a part of the consideration hereof, does hereby covenant and agree as a covenant running with the land that in the event facilities are constructed, maintained, or otherwise operated on the said property described in this lease, for a purpose for which a US Department of Transportation program or activity is extended or for another purpose involving the provision of similar services or benefits, the LESSEE shall maintain and operate such facilities and services in compliance with all other requirements imposed pursuant to Title 49, Code of Federal Regulations, U.S. Department of Transportation, Subtitle A, Office of the Secretary, part 21, Nondiscrimination in Federally assisted programs of the U.S. Department of Transportation -- Effectuation of Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as said Regulations may be amended. That in the event of breach of any of the above non-discrimination covenants, the City shall have the right to terminate the lease, and to reenter and repossess said land and the facilities thereon, and hold the same as if said lease had never been made or issued. The following shall be included in all deeds, licenses, leases, permits, or similar agreements entered into by the City of Renton pursuant to the provisions of Title VI Assurances, item 7. The LESSEE, for himself or herself, his or her personal representatives, successors in interest, and assigns, as a part of the consideration hereof, does hereby covenant and agree as a covenant running with the land that (1) no person, on the grounds of race, color, sex, or national origin shall be excluded from participation in, be denied the benefits of, or be otherwise subjected to discrimination in the use of said facilities, (2) that in the construction of any improvements on, over or under such land and furnishing of services thereon, no person on the grounds of race, color, sex, or national origin shall be excluded from participation in, denied the benefits of, or otherwise be subjected to discrimination, (3) that the LESSEE shall use the premises in compliance with all requirements imposed by or pursuant to Title 49, Code of Federal Regulations, U.S. Department of Transportation, Subtitle A, Office of the Secretary, part 21, Nondiscrimination in Federally assisted programs of the U.S. Department of Transportation --- Effectuation of Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, and as said Regulations may be amended. That in the event of breach of any of the above nondiscrimination covenants, the City of Renton shall have the right to terminate the lease, and to re-enter and repossess said land and the facilities thereon, and hold the same as if said lease had never been made or issued. City of Renton Title VI Plan 23 AGENDA ITEM #7. g) Appendix 4 — Organizational Charts CITY OF RENTON ADMIN6TRATIVE COMMDNRYRECONOMIC WMMDNKY SERVM:ES NDMAN R60RRCESR P6LICE PDBLIC WORKS S EINIC ES q1Y 0.110 RNEY DEVE IOPMENT E%ECDT IVE R6K MAPIAG EMENT RDMIN6TRIUOR Lily L�M1 asizvrn Lny Pnorrey RweloproMSe[Y l:a Nd N[tle F¢ra lSer�ires CM1iet Pm culirg Harney CG rk Emrom[c lbleleprmry Sr. R zisa nt Liry InEornstion pryorrty pla ry Tec M1robSy City of Renton Title VI Plan hbYOh dflce Rlsk Maraga m±n a-'P�IY CM1Iet I Tra rtpeaa,lan systiwrre o �,or weiie nfairs n ewetis suPao[xocent' rc Ln it rcY sY�a nc adminly E1m_rEerM' Hvn nRtafu[c� xrvie �u � �s5arom Malrnerarce �v eez Patrol SeN Ite: CiYil Servi ScecelOpe ration Lommis icn �+pu[Y CM1let Ma rase. Fleld (lpeietpr¢ Irvest$aabre Patrvl ole�a,lem AaG $¢rvlmz ' 24 AGENDA ITEM #7. g) `Transportation Operations Manager Engineering Specialist II Civil Engineer III PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT Transportation Systems Division "Transp artation Systems Director Admiiistrative5euetaryl Administrative 5ecretaryl Secretary II *Transportation T"Transportation "Transportation Maintenance Manager Design Manager Planning Manager 5ecretary II Signal/Electronic 5ystems Supervisor 5ignal/Electronic 5ystem Technician III Signal/Electronic System Technician II Traffic Signage & Marking Sup ervisor Traffic Maintenance Worker II Principal Civil Engineer Civil Engineer III *Individuals marked with an asterisk serve as a Title VI Specialist or Coordinator. "Transportation Planner `Program Develop men[ Coordinator I Civil Engineer III B City of Renton Title VI Plan 25 AGENDA ITEM #7. g) Chapter 28 28.1 General Discussion Title VI Program Local agencies, as recipients of Federal financial assistance, are required to comply with various nondiscrimination laws and regulations, including Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964. Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 prohibits discrimination based on race, color, and national origin in the provision of benefits and services. Additional nondiscrimination laws include the Federal -aid Highway Act of 1973, which added sex (gender) as a protected class; and Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act and the Americans with Disabilities Act, which prohibits discrimination on the basis of disability. The Civil Rights Restoration Act of 1987 clarified the broad institution -wide application of Title VI and other nondiscrimination statutes. The term "program or activity" means all of the operations of Federal -aid recipients, subrecipients, and contractors, whether such programs and activities are federally funded or not. Similar to WSDOT, local agencies are expected to comply with the U.S. Department of Transportation's (USDOT) Title VI regulations contained in 49 CFR Part 21, and the Federal Highway Administration's (FHWA) regulations contained in 23 CFR 200. In addition, local agencies are expected to address Environmental Justice and Limited English Proficiency consistent with the guidance provided by WSDOT. If local agencies receive Federal Transit Administration (FTA) funds, they should refer to FTA's Title VI Circular C4202.IB. These federal regulations require WSDOT to obtain assurances from their subrecipients that they agree to maintain records and submit reports on its programs and activities; that the subrecipient will comply with Title VI, and that the assurances provide a right to enforcement. Each local agency that receives Federal funds through WSDOT is required to establish a Title VI Program to ensure that the provision of benefits and services, and transportation decision -making are conducted in a nondiscriminatory manner. This Title VI Program includes a requirement for local agencies to submit a plan specifying how it will implement their Title VI responsibilities. Agencies serving a population of 100,000 or more are required to have a Title VI Plan. Agencies serving a population less than 100,000 may use an abbreviated Title VI Plan, a Nondiscrimination Agreement. 28.2 Title VI Plan Development A Title VI Plan is a legal document that imposes individual legal liabilities to the signatory agency that are not transferable. Each local agency must develop a Title VI compliance document that reflects its individual transportation program structure. WSDOT will provide each local agency the technical support it needs to develop a Title VI Plan, or a Title VI Nondiscrimination Agreement, for agencies with populations of less than 100,000. WSDOT Local Agency Guidelines M 36-63.29 Page 28-1 October 2015 Title VI Program a nENDA Yrn8ff7, g� 1. Plan Scope — The Title VI Plan describes how recipients of federal financial assistance will develop and implement their Title VI Program. 2. Plan Format — A specific format is not prescribed. Sample formats are contained in Appendix 28.71 and 28.72. Appendix 28.71 has an example Title VI Plan for large agencies serving a population of 100,000 or more. Large local agencies should use this example to prepare their plan that is to contain the categories listed in item C below (Key Points to Consider in Developing Plan). Appendix 28.72 has a boilerplate for small agencies serving a population of less than 100,000 to use in developing their Abbreviated Title VI Plan/ Nondiscrimination Agreement. If there are questions on these examples, please contact your Region Local Programs Engineer. Larger agencies (populations greater than 100,000) having a Title VI Plan already approved for a different federally funded program, have the option to submit the existing Title VI Plan for approval or create a new one. Agencies can submit their plans through the Region Local Program Engineer for review by WSDOT's OEO. The WSDOT OEO will review the plan in accordance with Federal requirements. If necessary, supplemental information will be requested prior to approval. 3. Key Points to Consider In Developing a Plan — These points are incorporated in the Nondiscrimination Agreement shown in Appendix 28.72 for cities under 100,000 population. a. Policy Statement — The policy statement reflects the agency's commitment to Title VI compliance, including all related Federal laws and regulations, and is signed by the agency's Chief Executive Officer (CEO). b. Authorities — This section cites all relevant Federal statutes, regulations, executive orders and other legislation. c. Organization and Staffing — This section identifies the Title VI Coordinator and program area Title VI Specialists within the organization directly responsible for the management and administration of the Title VI Program. The Plan is to include an organization chart that describes the reporting relationship between the designated Title VI Specialists within each program emphasis area and the designated agency Title VI Coordinator. d. Program Emphasis Areas — This section describes the federal aid transportation program areas (i.e., Planning, Research, Design, Education and Training, Right of Way, Construction, Maintenance), the areas' legal/ operational authorities, and assigns Title VI compliance monitoring responsibilities to each area. Page 28-2 WSDOT Local Agency Guidelines M 36-63.29 October 2015 Chapter 28 d rENM-IIM 7. g) e. Title VI Standard Assurances and Its Appendices (DOT 1050.2A) — The USDOT 1050.2A Standard Title VI Assurances (Appendix 28.77) must be completed and signed by the agency's Chief Executive Officer (CEO), and made a part of the agency's Title VI Program Plan/Nondiscrimination Agreement. The Appendices associated with the USDOT Assurances must be inserted into every contract/agreement (regardless of funding source) as described in the Assurances document. For consultant contracts, see Exhibit F of Appendix 31.79. The agency's CEO signs these assurances. f. Complaint Procedures — This section outlines the process for filing complaints and the investigative process. It also identifies the agency staff positions responsible for this process, and the time limits for the submission of complaints and completion of investigations (60 days per 23 CFR 200.9(b)(3)). g. Table of Contents — This section enables the reader to quickly locate particular sections of the Plan. 28.3 Reporting Requirements Local agencies are to provide the following reports and/or data to WSDOT related to their transportation program: Annual Title VI Update and Accomplishment Report All agencies with approved Title VI Plans or Nondiscrimination Agreements are to annually prepare a report of their Title VI Program implementation compliance activities. This report is due one year from the date of approval of the Title VI plan and then annually on that same date. This is to describe the transportation activities and any changes that occurred during the year, as well as planned efforts (goals) for the coming year. This Annual Title VI Update and Accomplishment Report is to be completed by each agency and forwarded to the Region Local Programs Engineer, who will forward it to Local Programs for transmittal to WSDOT's OEO for review and approval. If there has been a change in the agency's CEO, an updated Assurances document is required to be submitted with the Update report. Examples of Annual Reports are outlined in Appendix 28.73 for agencies over 100,000 population and Appendix 28.74 for agencies with population under 100,000. Revisions to the Local Agency's Title VI Plan or Nondiscrimination Agreement The Plan is to contain current information on names of staff and any other needed revisions. Agencies must submit substantial revisions to their Title VI Plan or Nondiscrimination Agreement to the Region Local Programs Engineer for transmittal to Local Programs for submittal to WSDOT's OEO as soon as they occur for review and approval. Substantial revisions may be the filing of the agency's new CEO signature, administrative changes in the agency's Title VI Program administrative structure and staffing, or changes to the plan's complaint procedures, etc. Local agencies only need to submit a revised Title VI document when program changes such as the ones described above take place. WSDOT Local Agency Guidelines M 36-63.29 Page 28-3 October 2015 Title VI Program a nENDA Yrn8ff7. g� 28.4 Title VI Complaint Investigations The local agency is responsible for investigating all Title VI discrimination complaints occurring within the federal aid transportation program or its activities, unless the complaint filed is against the local agency. Complaints naming a local agency as a respondent shall be forwarded to the Region Local Programs Engineer, who will in turn forward it to Local Programs. WSDOT's OEO will investigate these complaints. Each local agency's Title VI Plan will have External Complaint Procedures to assist them in conducting a timely, fair and impartial investigation. All Title VI investigations are to be completed within 60 days of acceptance of a complaint. A Log of Complaints must be maintained by each agency, and submitted annually as part of the agency's Title VI Annual Update. The Log of Complaints must contain the following information for each complaint filed: • The name and address of the person filing the complaint. • The date of the complaint. • The basis of the complaint. • The disposition of the complaint. • The status of the complaint. A Log of Complaints is shown in Appendix 28.75. Only qualified, well -trained investigators should conduct these investigations. No agency is allowed to investigate a complaint against itself. All findings from state or local investigations are preliminary and subject to the concurrence of FHWA Headquarters Civil Rights (HCR). FHWA HRC will render final decisions in all cases including those investigated by WSDOT. There are no administrative appeal forums in Title VI complaints. Once FHWA HCR issues its final agency decision (FAD), a complainant in disagreement with such determination may file an appeal with the appropriate US District Court. 28.5 Title VI Compliance Reviews WSDOT/FHWA will conduct periodic reviews of compliance with Federal Title VI regulations as follows: 1. Compliance Review — The WSDOT Title VI Coordinator will notify Local Programs and work through the Region Local Programs Engineers to make arrangements to conduct periodic compliance reviews of local agencies having approved Title VI Plans/Nondiscrimination Agreements. The compliance review will focus on how effectively the local agency has implemented Title VI. Documentation is gathered and individuals with Title VI responsibilities are interviewed as part of the review process. The local agency will be notified in writing of the scheduled date and the documents that will be required for the on - site review. Page 28-4 WSDOT Local Agency Guidelines M 36-63.29 October 2015 Chapter 28 d GEN-IIM 7. g) 2. Local Agency Found in Compliance — If no deficiencies are found during the on -site review, the local agency will be informed at the conclusion of the review, followed by a written notice of compliance. 3. Local Agency Found in Noncompliance — If deficiencies are identified during the review, the local agency will be apprised of them at the conclusion of the review, followed by written notice, and given 90 days to correct them. After an agency corrects deficiencies, it will be notified in writing that it is in compliance. If a local agency does not correct Title VI Program deficiencies identified by WSDOT or FHWA, it may be subject to sanctions including the suspension of FHWA funding. 4. Local Agency Responsibilities — Local agencies administering federal aid contracts are required to conduct on -site compliance reviews of prime contractors and subcontractors. Agencies needing assistance in conducting on -site reviews should contact their Region Local Programs Engineer. 28.6 Other Nondiscrimination Statutes Related to Title VI Limited English Proficiency — LEP (Executive Order 13166) — As noted above, one of the bases covered under Title VI is national origin. One type of national origin discrimination is discrimination based on a person's inability to speak, read, write, or understand English. The federal government and those receiving federal financial assistance (recipients, subrecipients, contractors) must take reasonable steps to ensure that LEP persons have meaningful access to the programs, services, and information those entities provide. This may require providing written and/or oral communications in a language other than English. More information regarding LEP responsibilities can be found at www.lep.gov/recipbroch.html and at www.usdoj. gov/crt/cor/lep/dotlep.htm. Environmental Justice (Executive Order 12898) — Procedures for addressing environmental justice may be found in Chapter 24 of this manual, as well as Chapter 458 of the Environmental Procedures Manual M 31-11. 28.7 Appendices 28.71 Title VI Plan for Agencies Over 100,000 Population 28.72 Nondiscrimination Agreement Population Under 100,000 28.73 Annual Report for Agency With Population Over 100,000 — Example 28.74 NDA Annual Report Population Under 100,000 — Example 28.75 Title VI Complaint Log 28.76 Title VI Compliance Review Questionnaire for Local Agencies 28.77 USDOT Standard Title VI Assurances WSDOT Local Agency Guidelines M 36-63.29 Page 28-5 October 2015 Title VI Program a nENna TrM7, g� Page 28-6 WSDOT Local Agency Guidelines M 36-63.29 October 2015 AGENDA ITEM #7. g) Appendix 28.71 Title VI Plan for Agencies Over 100,000 Population Title VI Plan for Agencies Over 100,000 Population Agency Federally Funded Transportation Program TITLE VI PLAN Agency Commissioners Agency Administrator Public Works Director Prepared by: Grants & Compliance Manager (Title VI Coordinator) Office of Budget and Information Services Appendix III Lease/Deed Provisions 18 February 2018 Page 1 WSDOT Local Agency Guidelines M 36-63.35 Page 28-7 March 2018 Appendix 28.71 Title Vl Plan for AgentPob6,'68Jpi7' g/ I. Policy Statement, Authorities, and Citations Page 2 A. Policy of Nondiscrimination — Agency assures that no person shall on the grounds of race, color, national origin, or sex as provided by Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, and the Civil Rights Restoration Act of 1987 (P.L. 100.259) be excluded from participation in, be denied the benefits of, or be otherwise subjected to discrimination under any Agency sponsored program or activity. Agency further assures every effort will be made to ensure non-discrimination in all of its programs and activities, whether those programs and activities are federally funded or not. In the event Agency distributes federal aid funds to another entity, Agency will include Title VI language in all written agreements and will monitor for compliance. Title VI compliance is a condition of receipt for federal funds. Assurance of compliance, therefore, falls under the proper authority of the Board of Agency Commissioners pursuant to its budgetary authority and responsibility. The Agency Administrator and Title VI Coordinator are authorized to ensure compliance with provisions of this policy and with the law, including the requirements of 23 Code of Federal Regulation (CFR) 200 and 49 CFR 21. Agency Administrator Date B. Authorities — Title VI of the 1964 Civil Rights Act provides that no person in the United States shall on the grounds of race, color, national origin, or sex be excluded from participation in, be denied the benefits of, or be otherwise subjected to discrimination under any program or activity receiving federal financial assistance. The Civil Rights Restoration Act of 1987 broadened the scope of Title VI coverage by expanding the definition of terms "programs or activities" to include all programs or activities of federal aid recipients, subrecipients, and contractors, whether such programs and activities are federally assisted or not (Public Law 100- 259 [S. 557] March 22, 1988). C. Additional Citations — Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964; 42 USC 2000d to 2000d-4; 42 USC 4601 to 4655; 23 USC 109(h); 23 USC 324; DOT Order 1050.2; EO 12250; EO 12898; 28 CFR 50.3 February 2018 Page 28-8 WSDOT Local Agency Guidelines M 36-63.35 March 2018 Title VI Plan for Agencies Over 100,000 Population AGEND4 jeT .-#7. g) II. Organization, Staffing, and Structure A. Organizational Chart — Reporting Relationships Board of County Commissioners Approves and Adopts Policy County Administrator Ensures Compliance With Policy Director, OBS Grants and Compliance Manager (Title VI Coordinator) Director, Human Resources Senior Human Resources Representative (Title VI Specialist) Director, General Services Purchasing Manager, Purchasing Division (Title VI Specialist) Director, Community Development Long Range Planning Manager (Title VI Specialist) Director, Public Works Environmental Services Division Operations Division Environmental Services Manager Deputy Director Public Works (Title VI Specialist) (Title VI Specialist) Design and Engineering Division Administrative Division Capital Improvement Program Manager Assistant to the Public Works Director (Title VI Specialist) (Title VI Specialist) B. Staffing and Structure Agency Administrator — The Agency Administrator is authorized to ensure compliance with provisions of the Agency's policy of nondiscrimination and with the law, including the requirements of 23 CFR Part 200 and 49 CFR Part 21. The Agency's grants compliance function and Title VI coordination shall be performed under the authority of the Agency Administrator. Title VI Coordinator — Agency has created a position of Grants and Compliance Manager to perform the duties of the Title VI Coordinator (Coordinator) and ensure implementation of the Agency's Title VI Federally Funded Transportation Program. The Grants and Compliance Manager has other duties and responsibilities in addition to Title VI. Although the Grants and Compliance Manager reports to the Director of the Office of Budget and Information Services (OBIS), their direct supervisor, this position shall have an indirect reporting relationship and access to the Agency Administrator. February 2018 Page 3 WSDOT Local Agency Guidelines M 36-63.35 March 2018 Page 28-9 Appendix 28.71 Title Vl Plan for AgentPob6,'68Jpi7' g/ Title VI Specialists — Additionally, the Agency has designated Title VI Specialists (Specialists) in departmental special emphasis program areas. The Specialists, designated below, shall work in concert with the Title VI Coordinator. These key programs or department areas are subject to receiving federal assistance through grants or other types of transportation related funding, or are responsible for implementing Agency directives and policies to ensure civil rights compliance and equal opportunity. The Specialists will work with the Coordinator to ensure their respective departments and programs comply with Title VI regulations and assurances, meet the objectives of the Title VI Plan, meet federal and state reporting requirements, and provide adequate training opportunities for applicable staff. Title VI Specialists will work with the Coordinator to ascertain Title VI compliance by contractors, subcontractors, consultants, suppliers and other subrecipients under federally funded projects or programs. Specialists will ensure applicable Title VI provisions and requirements are included in contractual agreements to prime contractors and subrecipients. Specialists will work with the Coordinator to obtain statistical data on race, color, national origin, handicap/ disability, age and sex of participants in, and beneficiaries of federally funded Agency transportation programs. Each of the Specialists will maintain data relative to their respective special emphasis program area, designated below. The Coordinator shall use the data to complete annual Title VI reports and for other administrative needs. Public Works Design and Engineering — Capital Improvement Program Manager Environmental Services Environmental Services Manager Operations — Deputy Director Public Works Administration —Assistant to the Public Works Director Community Development — Long Range Planning Manager Human Resources — Senior Human Resources Representatives General Services Purchasing — Purchasing Manager III. Title VI Plan Implementation and Program Administration Page 4 Title VI Coordinator's Responsibilities and Program Administration —As authorized by the Agency Administrator, the Title VI Coordinator is responsible for initiating, monitoring, and ensuring Agency's compliance with Title VI requirements as follows: A. Program Administration —Administer the Title VI program and coordinate implementation of the plan. Ensure compliance with the assurances, policy, and program objectives. Perform Title VI program reviews to assess administrative procedures, staffing, and resources; provide recommendations as required to the Agency Administrator and Director of OBIS. B. Complaints — Review written Title VI complaints that may be received by Agency following the adopted procedural guidelines (see Section V — Complaint Procedures). Ensure every effort is made to resolve complaints informally at the local or regional level. February 2018 Page 28-10 WSDOT Local Agency Guidelines M 36-63.35 March 2018 Title VI Plan for Agencies Over 100,000 Population AGEND4JeT .-#7. g) February 2018 C. Data Collection — Review the statistical data gathering process performed by Title VI Specialists periodically to ensure sufficiency of data for meeting the requirements of Title VI program administration. (See Section VII — Special Emphasis Program Areas.) D. Environmental Impact Statements — Ensure that available census data are included as a part of all Environmental Impact Statements/Assessments (EIS/EIA) conducted by Public Works (PW) for projects receiving Federal Highway Administration or other federal assistance. E. Training Programs — Conduct or facilitate training programs on Title VI issues and regulations for Agency employees; and facilitate Title VI training for appropriate staff, contractors and subrecipients. A summary of training conducted will be reported in the annual update. F. Title VI Plan Update — Review and update the Agency Transportation Program, Title VI Plan as needed or required. Present updated plan to the Agency Administrator for approval; submit amended Plan to WSDOT. G. Annual Accomplishment Report — Prepare an annual report of Title VI accomplishments and changes to the program in the preceding federal fiscal year; identify goals and objectives for the upcoming year as required; and submit by October 15. H. Public Dissemination — Work with Agency staff to develop and disseminate Title VI program information to Agency employees and subrecipients, including contractors, subcontractors, consultants, and subconsultants and beneficiaries, as well as the general public. Public dissemination may include postings of official statements, inclusion of Title VI language in contracts or other agreements, website postings, and annual publication of the Agency's Title VI Policy Statement in newspaper(s) having a general circulation, and informational brochures. Ensure public service announcements or notices are posted of proposed projects, hearings, meetings, or formation of public advisory boards, in newspapers or other media reaching the affected community. Ensure the full utilization of available minority publications or media; and, where appropriate, provide written or verbal information in languages other than English. I. Elimination of Discrimination — Work with the Public Works Department, Human Resources, and other Agency offices to establish procedures for promptly resolving deficiencies, as needed. Recommend procedures to identify and eliminate discrimination that may be discovered in any Agency processes. J. Maintain Legislative and Procedural Information — Federal laws, rules, and regulations, WSDOT guidelines, the current Agency Title VI Plan, Annual Accomplishment Reports, and other resource information pertaining to the implementation and administration of the Agency's Title VI program will be maintained and updated by the Coordinator. Information will be made available to other Agency departments or the public as requested or required. Page 5 WSDOT Local Agency Guidelines M 36-63.35 March 2018 Page 28-11 Appendix 28.71 Title Vl Plan for AgentPob6,'68Jpi7' g/ IV. NHI Education and Title VI Training Page 6 In keeping with adopted Agency policy of nondiscrimination, departmental procedures will be established or followed for Public Works employees to have equal access to applicable educational and training opportunities. Public Works staff will maintain program administration documentation and data necessary for preparation of annual Title VI reports, and will routinely supply the necessary data to the Title VI Coordinator. A. National Highway Institute (NHI) Education — The Coordinator will be notified when training for the National Highway Institute courses or workshops become available to Agency Public Works employees. The Director of the Department of Public Works will establish policy for the selection of participants interested in taking part in the National Highway Institute Training workshops to ensure that no one is denied participation or subjected to discrimination on the basis of race, color, national origin or sex. A report will be completed and forwarded to the Coordinator upon completion of each educational seminar or course throughout the course of the year, which shall include the name of each participant, their title, division, sex and ethnicity for use in completing the annual Title VI accomplishment report. B. Title VI Training — The Coordinator is responsible for overall Title VI related training and staff development for Title VI Specialists and other Agency employees. The Coordinator will organize or conduct a minimum of one internal Title VI training session annually. The Coordinator will organize and facilitate the provision of Title VI training sessions for consultants, contractors, and subcontractors periodically. WSDOT's Office of Equal Opportunity Internal and External Civil Rights Branch and the Contract Compliance Office may be asked to provide applicable training. C. Selection of Instructors — The Coordinator will collaborate with the Agency's Purchasing Division to ensure Agency policy is followed in the selection of instructors for Agency Public Works training courses/ workshops, and ensure equal opportunity in the selection process for all training contracts. Per adopted policy, the Agency will provide accessibility to Minority/Women/Disadvantage Business Enterprise consulting and training firms to compete for training contracts. February 2018 Page 28-12 WSDOT Local Agency Guidelines M 36-63.35 March 2018 Title VI Plan for Agencies Over 100,000 Population AGEND4JeT ._#7. g) V. Complaint Procedures —Allegations of Discrimination in Federally - Assisted Programs or Activities A. Overview — These procedures cover all complaints filed under Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 as amended, Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, Civil Rights Restoration Act of 1987, and the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990, relating to any program or activity administered by Agency, as well as to subrecipients, consultants, and contractors. Intimidation or retaliation of any kind is prohibited by law. The procedures do not deny the right of the complainant to file formal complaints with other state or federal agencies or to seek private counsel for complaints alleging discrimination. Every effort will be made to resolve complaints informally at the Agency and subrecipient level. The option of informal mediation meeting(s) between the affected parties and a designated mediator may be utilized for resolution. B. Procedures Any individual, group of individuals, or entity that believes they have been subjected to discrimination prohibited by nondiscrimination requirements may file a written complaint with Agency Human Resources, Public Works or Board of Agency Commissioners. A formal complaint must be filed within 180 calendar days of the alleged occurrence. The Agency will not officially act or respond to complaints made verbally. Upon receiving the written complaint, Agency will determine its jurisdiction, acceptability, need for additional information, and the investigative merit of the complaint. In some situations, the Agency may request the Washington State Department of Transportation (WSDOT) Office of Equal Opportunity conduct the investigation. In the event WSDOT handles the investigation, they will follow their adopted procedures for investigating discrimination complaints, per their current State Title VI Plan. 3. If the complaint is against a subrecipient, consultant, or contractor, under contract with the Agency the appropriate division and/or agency shall be notified of the complaint, within 15 calendar days. 4. Once the Agency decides its course of action, the complainant and the respondent will be notified in writing of such determination within five calendar days. The complaint will be logged into the records of the Title VI Coordinator, and the basis for the allegation identified including race, color, national origin, handicap/disability, age, or sex. 5. In cases where Agency assumes investigation of the complaint, the Agency will provide the respondent with the opportunity to respond to the allegations in writing. The respondent will have ten calendar days upon receipt, to furnish the Agency with his/her response to the allegations. February 2018 Page 7 WSDOT Local Agency Guidelines M 36-63.35 March 2018 Page 28-13 Appendix 28.71 Title Vl Plan for AgentPob6,'68jpi7' g/ Page 8 6. Within 60 days of receipt of the complaint, the Coordinator or WSDOT investigator will prepare a written investigative report for the Agency Engineer and Agency Administrator. The report shall include a narrative description of the incident, identification of persons interviewed, findings and recommendations for disposition. 7. The recommendation shall be reviewed by the Prosecuting Attorney's office (PA). The PA may discuss the report and recommendations with the Coordinator and other appropriate departmental staff. The report will be modified as needed and made final for its release to the parties. 8. Once the investigative report becomes final, briefings will be scheduled with each party within 15 days. Both the complainant and the respondent shall receive a copy of the investigative report during the briefings and will be notified of their respective appeal rights. 9. A copy of the complaint and Agency's investigative report will be issue to WSDOT's External Civil Rights Branch (or the appropriate oversight agency) within 60 calendar days of the receipt of the complaint. 10. If the complainant or respondent is not satisfied with the results of the investigation of the alleged discriminatory practice(s) he or she shall be advised of their rights to appeal the agency's decision to WSDOT, U.S. Department of Transportation or U.S. Department of Justice. The complainant has 180 calendar days after the appropriate agency's final resolution to appeal to USDOT. Unless new facts not previously considered come to light, reconsideration of the final determination by the investigating agency will not be available. 11. An annual Log of Complaints must be maintained by each agency. The Log of Complaints must contain the following information for each complaint filed: • The name and address of the person filing the complaint. • The date of the complaint. • The basis of the complaint. • The disposition of the complaint. • The status of the complaint. Only qualified, well -trained investigators should conduct these investigations. No agency is allowed to investigate a complaint against itself. February 2018 Page 28-14 WSDOT Local Agency Guidelines M 36-63.35 March 2018 Title VI Plan for Agencies Over 100,000 Population AGEND4jeT._#7. g) VI. Subrecipient Review and Remedial Action Procedures February 2018 A. Title VI Review of Subrecipients of Federal Aid Highway Funds — Public Works Specialists and the Coordinator will assist WSDOT to periodically conduct Title VI compliance reviews. Title VI Specialists and Public Works staff will review select recipients of federal aid highway or other federal funds, to ensure adherence to Title VI requirements (see Section VII). The Coordinator and Specialists will work cooperatively to periodically confirm operational guidelines provided to consultants, contractors, and subrecipients, including Title VI language, provisions, and related requirements, as applicable. B. Post -Grant Reviews — The Coordinator will collaborate with Specialists and Public Works staff to conduct periodic post grant reviews of select recipients of federal highway funds or other federal funds, for roads, sidewalks, bridges, municipal construction, etc. to ensure adherence to Title VI requirements (see Section VII). Appropriate staff will periodically confirm that operational guidelines provided to consultants, contractors and subrecipients include Title VI language and provisions and related requirements, where applicable. C. Remedial Action — When irregularities occur in the administration of federal aid highway programs at either the Agency or subrecipient levels, corrective action will be taken to resolve identified Title VI issues. Agency will seek the cooperation of the consultant, contractor or other subrecipient in correcting deficiencies found during periodic reviews. Agency will provide technical assistance and guidance, upon request, to support voluntarily compliance by the subrecipient. When conducting Title VI compliance reviews, the Agency will reduce to writing any recommended remedial action agreed upon by the Agency and subrecipient, and provide a copy of the letter within a period not to exceed 45 days. Subrecipients placed in a deficiency status will be given a reasonable time, not to exceed 90 days after receipt of the deficiency letter, to voluntarily correct deficiencies. When a subrecipient fails or refuses to voluntarily comply with requirements within the allotted time frame, Agency will submit to WSDOT and FHWA copies of the case file and a recommendation that the subrecipient be found in noncompliance. A follow-up review will be conducted within 180 days of the initial review to ascertain if the subrecipient has complied with the Title VI Program requirements in correcting deficiencies previously identified. If the subrecipient refuses to comply, Agency and WSDOT may, with FHWNs concurrence, initiate sanctions per 49 CFR 21. Page 9 WSDOT Local Agency Guidelines M 36-63.35 March 2018 Page 28-15 Appendix 28.71 Title Vl Plan for AgentPob6,'68Jpi7' g/ VII. Title VI Implementation Activities in Special Emphasis Program Areas Page 10 A. Planning and Location Activities Planning Process — The Agency Engineer has responsibility for providing long-range planning (through a service agreement with Community Development), program development, and capital programming necessary to provide efficient transportation services to Agency citizens. The Agency Engineer annually updates and coordinates Agency's six -year plan for transportation improvement programs and projects. The update also informs other Agency jurisdictions of the current planning direction for transportation needs. Projects included in the update are the result of evaluation and prioritization of needs in various transportation areas. The evaluation process includes input from various divisions in the department, cities, local jurisdictions and organizations, citizen groups, and private individuals. All six -year plans must be consistent with the adopted Comprehensive Plan approved under the State's Growth Management Act. Authorities — 23 CFR 450; RCW 35.77; RCW 36; RCW 47.06; RCW 47.80 3. Public Involvement in Planning Activities and Title VI Agency Code; a. Invite participation of a cross section of the populace from social, economic, and ethnic groups in the planning process by disseminating written program information to minority media and ethnic organizations, and providing public service announcements for all local media, when forming citizen advisory committees or planning board, and requesting involvement. b. Public Works staff will obtain demographic statistics at applicable community meetings and public hearings involving transportation planning sessions. Data will be gathered through use of a voluntary self - reporting form which includes race, gender, and national origin. Copies of the completed forms will be provided to Title VI Coordinator after each meeting. c. To ensure access to public meetings, evening meetings will be conducted in a variety of community buildings throughout the Agency, including those along transit routes, ensure translation services are available if anticipated, and ensure public meetings are held in predominantly minority communities when transportation projects will specifically impact those communities. February 2018 Page 28-16 WSDOT Local Agency Guidelines M 36-63.35 March 2018 Title VI Plan for Agencies Over 100,000 Population AGEND4JeT ._#7. g) B. Consultant Contracts Activities 1. Consultant Contracts Administration — The D&E Division is responsible for recommending consultant firms to the Agency Engineer for final selection, negotiation and award. The Division administers awarded consultant contracts. 2. Authorities — Agency Ordinance 90-81; WSDOT Local Agency Guidelines; 48 CFR 31; 23 CFR 172 3. Consultant Selection Process — Public Works staff will request qualifications from consulting engineering firms specializing in various aspects of civil engineering which may relate to public works projects and the development of construction plans and special provisions for roads and bridges, design work associated with structures, performing environmental studies or preparing NEPA or SEPA documents for public works projects. Consultant selection from the certified list maintained by the Purchasing Division adheres to Washington State regulations (RCWs) and is consistent with Agency vendor policies. 4. Title VI Assurances and Provisions a. Include applicable Disadvantaged Business Enterprise (DBE) goals in designated projects, and seek to proactively achieve the goal(s). b. Include Title VI assurance and provision language in all federally funded consultant contracts. Periodically review documents and language to ensure compliance with current laws and regulations. Provide a copy of the form of the contract to the Coordinator, and any amendments or updates that may occur over time. c. A Public Works Specialist will maintain updated demographic data on the utilization of women -and minority -owned consulting firms. As they occur, a copy of the award letter will be provided to the Coordinator for use in preparing the Annual Update Accomplishment Report. C. Design and Engineering/Environmental Activities 1. The Public Works Design and Engineering Division is responsible for the Capital Improvement Program (CIP) and environmental permitting for projects. Studies are performed to assess various environmental factors as they relate to the implementation of the Agency's Annual Road Program, including evaluating demographic data. 2. Authorities — Agency Ordinance; WSDOT Local Agency Guidelines; Standard Plans WSDOT/ APWA - M 21-01; Title 23, USC 109(d), 14(a), 217, 315 and 402(a); 23 CFR 1204.4; 23 CFR 771; EO 12898; 49 CFR 1.48(b)(33) and 1.48(c)(2; National Environmental Policy Act of 1969, 42 USC 4321; 40 CFR Part 1500; 49 CFR Part 622; Environmental Procedures Manual M 31-11; EO 12898 February 2018 Page 11 WSDOT Local Agency Guidelines M 36-63.35 March 2018 Page 28-17 Appendix 28.71 Title Vl Plan for AgentPob6,'68Jpi7' g/ Page 12 3. Design/Environmental Review Process and Title VI a. Depending on the scope, complexity, and impacts of a project, a National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA), NEPA Categorical Exclusion, NEPA Environmental Assessment, State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA) checklist, SEPA Determination of Non Significance, or NEPA and/or SEPA Environmental Impact Statement will be completed. b. Monitor compliance with Title VI requirements in all aspects of conducting Environmental Impact Statements or Assessments. Provide a comprehensive summary of the demographic and environmental data elements to be considered by the EIS/EIA process to the Coordinator; including updated summary lists as applicable. Incorporate into the review process, adequate. c. Time for the Coordinator to review and comment, as applicable, on the draft EIS/EIA to ensure there are no violations of the Federal Civil Rights Act, as amended, as a result of the agency's federal aid highway activities. d. In order to ensure dissemination of information and foster participation from affected populations, the Public Works staff will place public notices in applicable general and minority media; select accessible locations and times for public hearings or meetings, and arrange for translation services as needed; particularly in projects impacting predominantly minority communities. Ensure the public has information pertaining to their rights to call or write the department to view plans and discuss environmental problems. e. Public Works staff will obtain demographic data at community meetings and public hearings pertaining to the transportation design phase. Data will be gathered through use of a voluntary sign-up form which includes race, gender, and national origin. Copies of the voluntary self -reporting forms will be provided to the Coordinator after each meeting. £ Public Works staff shall provide a copy of the Annual Construction Report to the Title VI Coordinator in or around April of each year. The Coordinator shall work with the Agency GIS Department to generate a map of the federally funded transportation projects to include demographic data of the neighborhoods affected by the projects. D. Right of Way Activities 1. Real Property Services — The Local Programs Right of Way section oversees the appraisal and acquisition of real property and relocation assistance services for federally funded public works projects. The right of way acquisition process entails appraisal of property, negotiation of terms and conditions for acquisition, and assistance in the relocation of displaced individuals, businesses, farm operations, nonprofit organizations, and property management. The Real Estate Services Office is located in the Development Division. 2. Authorities —Right of Way Manual M 26-01; 23 CFR 130; 49 CFR 24; RCW 8.26; RCW 47; WAC 468-100 February 2018 Page 28-18 WSDOT Local Agency Guidelines M 36-63.35 March 2018 Title VI Plan for Agencies Over 100,000 Population AGEND4JeT ._#7. g) 3. Right of Way Activities and Title VI a. Ensure equal opportunity in all aspects of procuring real estate service contracting and appraisal agreements. Follow adopted Agency vendor procurement policies in the acquisition of contracted services. b. Utilize current OMWBE directories identifying fee appraiser organizations and the Washington State Department of Transportation's list of certified fee appraisers when seeking services. Maintain data on awards to minority and female appraisers, and provide data to the Title VI Coordinator on a quarterly basis. c. Follow the guidelines in the Right of Way Manual M 26-01 for property acquisition as well as applicable laws and regulations, including Title VI and Section 504. d. Adhere to departmental policy of apprising affected property owners, tenants, and others involved in right of way acquisition of their rights and options regarding negotiation, relocation, condemnation and other aspects of the acquisition process. e. Provide copies of the relocation assistance literature produced by WSDOT and a copy of the Agency Title VI Compliance brochure to all affected parties. £ Incorporate Title VI language and assurance statements in all brochures that are provided to property owners and tenants impacted by a highway transportation project. Monitor all program functions for compliance with Title VI provisions throughout real estate acquisition process. g. Ensure that appraised values and communications associated with the appraisal and negotiation operations result in equitable treatment. h. Ensure comparable replacement dwellings are available and assistance is given to all displaced persons and entities by the property acquisition process. i. Maintain statistical data including race, color, national origin, and sex on all relocatees affected by federally funded projects, and provide detailed demographic data quarterly to the Title VI Coordinator. E. Construction and Maintenance Activities 1. Construction Management Section — This section is located in the Design and Engineering Division, and is responsible for administration of all new construction contracts and inspecting bridges. The D&E Division is responsible for oversight and the administration of transportation construction projects, as set forth by policy decisions and supervision of the Agency Engineer. 2. Authorities —Construction Manual M 41-01; Maintenance Manual M 51-01; Local Agency Guidelines M 36-63; Standard Specifications for Road, Bridge, and Municipal Construction M 41-10. February 2018 Page 13 WSDOT Local Agency Guidelines M 36-63.35 March 2018 Page 28-19 Appendix 28.71 Title Vl Plan for AgentPob6,'68Jpi7' g/ 3. Maintenance — The Operations Division is responsible for the efficient program for maintaining Agency roads, bridges, and parks/grounds by economically utilizing the resources of contractors, equipment, and materials. 4. Authorities —Maintenance Manual M 51-01; Construction Manual M 41-01; Standard Specifications for Road, Bridge and Municipal Construction M 41-10; Clark Agency Road Standards 5. Construction and Maintenance Activities and Title VI a. Review all federally funded projects for application of DBE goals. As appropriate, include DBE provisions in those projects with designated goals. Include Title VI language in bid announcements and applicable construction documents, as stipulated in the Agency's Title VI Policy Statement (p. 2) and Assurances (Addendum 2, p. 14-15) herein. b. Award construction contracts on the basis of lowest responsive bidder, as well as meeting DBE requirements. Include Title VI language in prime contract award letters to encourage utilization of DBE subcontracts and vendors. c. Ensure that prime contractors with DBE requirements award contracted work to qualified DBEs which perform commercially useful functions. d. Monitor all maintenance and construction operations to ensure nondiscrimination throughout all operations. e. Coordinate the gathering of maintenance and construction information regarding DBE participation for the Annual Title VI Report; and provide to the Coordinator. Page 14 February 2018 Page 28-20 WSDOT Local Agency Guidelines M 36-63.35 March 2018 Title VI Plan for Agencies Over 100,000 Population AGEND4JeT .-#7. g) Exhibit 1 — Agency Title VI Notice to the Public Agency hereby gives public notice that it is the Agency's policy to assure full compliance with Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, the Civil Rights Restoration Act of 1987, and related statutes and regulations in all programs and activities. Title VI requires that no person shall, on the grounds of race, color, sex, or national origin be excluded from the participation in, be denied the benefits of, or be otherwise subjected to discrimination under any Federal Aid Highway program or other activity for which Agency receives federal financial assistance. Any person who believes they have been aggrieved by an unlawful discriminatory practice under Title VI has a right to file a formal complaint with Agency. Any such complaint must be in writing and filed with the Agency Title VI Coordinator within one hundred, eighty (180) days following the date of the alleged discriminatory occurrence. Title VI Discrimination Complaint Forms may be obtained from the Human Resources office at no cost to the complainant by calling xxx-xxx-xxxx. February 2018 Page 15 WSDOT Local Agency Guidelines M 36-63.35 Page 28-21 March 2018 Appendix 28.71 Title Vl Plan for AgentPob6,'68Jpi7' g/ Exhibit 2 — Agency Title VI Assurances The Agency of in the State of Washington, (hereinafter referred to as the "Recipient"), HEREBY AGREES THAT as a condition to receiving any federal financial assistance from the U.S. Department of Transportation will comply with Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, 78 Stat. 252, 42 USC 2000d-42 USC 2000d-4 (hereinafter referred to as the Act), and all requirements imposed by or pursuant to Title 49, Code of Federal Regulations, Department of Transportation, Subtitle A, Office of the Secretary Part 21, Nondiscrimination in Federally -Assisted Programs of the Department of Transportation --Effectuation of Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 (hereinafter referred to as the Regulations), and other pertinent directives, to the end that in accordance with the Act, Regulations, and other pertinent directives, no person in the United States shall, on the grounds of race, color, sex, or national origin be excluded from participation in, be denied the benefits of, or be otherwise subjected to discrimination under any program or activity for which the Recipient receives federal financial assistance through the Washington State Department of Transportation, including the U.S. Department of Transportation and Federal Highway Administration, and HEREBY GIVES ASSURANCE THAT it will promptly take any measures necessary to effectuate this agreement. This Assurance is required by Subsection 21.7(a)(1) of the Regulations. More specifically and without limiting the above general assurance, the Recipient hereby gives the following specific assurances to its Federal Aid Highway Program: 1. That the Recipient agrees that each "program" and each "facility" as defined in Subsections 21.23(e) and 21.23(b) of the Regulations, will be (with regard to a "program") conducted, or will be (with regard to a "facility") operated in compliance with all requirements imposed by, or pursuant to, the Regulations. 2. That the Recipient shall insert the following notification in all solicitations for bids for work or material subject to the Regulations made in connection with the Federal Aid Highway Program, and in adapted form in all proposals for negotiated agreements: Agency in accordance with Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 and 78 Stat. 252, 42 USC 2000d-4 and Title 49, Code of Federal Regulations, Department of Transportation, Subtitle A, Office of the Secretary, Part 21, Nondiscrimination in Federally -Assisted Programs of the Department of Transportation issued pursuant to such Act, hereby notifies all bidders that it will affirmatively ensure that any contract entered into pursuant to this advertisement, disadvantaged business enterprises as defined at 49 CFR Part 26 will be afforded full opportunity to submit bids in response to this invitation and will not be discriminated against on the grounds of race, color, national origin, or sex in consideration for an award. 3. That the Recipient shall insert the clauses of Appendix 1 of this Assurance in every contract subject to the Act and the Regulations. Page 16 February 2018 Page 28-22 WSDOT Local Agency Guidelines M 36-63.35 March 2018 Title VI Plan for Agencies Over 100,000 Population AGEND4JeT .-#7. g) 4. That the Recipient shall insert the clauses of Appendix 2 of this Assurance, as a covenant running with the land, in any deed from the United States effecting a transfer of real property, structures, or improvements thereon, or interest therein. 5. That where the Recipient receives federal financial assistance to construct a facility, or part of a facility, the Assurance shall extend to the entire facility and facilities operated in connection therewith. 6. That where the Recipient receives federal financial assistance in the form, or for the acquisition of real property, or an interest in real property, the Assurance shall extend rights to space on, over or under such property. 7. That the Recipient shall include the appropriate clauses set forth in Appendix 3 of this Assurance, as a covenant running with the land, in any future deeds, leases, permits, licenses, and similar agreements entered into by the Recipient with other parties: (a) for the subsequent transfer of real property acquired or improved under the Federal Aid Highway Program; and (b) for the construction or use of or access to space on, over or under real property acquired, or improved under the Federal Aid Highway Program. 8. That this Assurance obligates the Recipient for the period during which federal financial assistance is extended to the program, or is in the form of, personal property, or real property or interest therein or structures or improvements thereon, in which case the Assurance obligates the Recipient or any transferee for the longer of the following periods: (a) the period during which the property is used for a purpose for which the federal financial assistance is extended, of for another purpose involving the provision of similar services or benefits; or (b) the period during which the Recipient retains ownership or possession of the property. 9. The Recipient shall provide for such methods of administration for the program as are found by the Secretary of Transportation, or the official to whom s/he delegates specific authority to give reasonable guarantee that it, other recipients, subgrantees, contractors, subcontractors, transferees, successors in interest, and other participants of federal financial assistance under such program will comply with all requirements imposed or pursuant to the Act, the Regulations, and this Assurance. 10. The Recipient agrees that the United States has a right to seek judicial endorsement with regard to any matter arising under the Act, the Regulations, and this Assurance. THIS ASSURANCE is given in consideration of and for the purpose of obtaining any and all federal grants, loans, contracts, property, discounts or other federal financial assistance extended after the date hereof to the Recipient by the U.S. Department of Transportation under the Federal Aid Highway Program and is binding on it, other recipients, subgrantees, contractors, subcontractors, transferees, successors in interest and other participants in the Federal Aid Highway Program. The person whose signature appears below is authorized to sign this Assurance on behalf of the Recipient. February 2018 Page 17 WSDOT Local Agency Guidelines M 36-63.35 March 2018 Page 28-23 Appendix 28.71 Title Vl Plan for AgentPob6,'68Jpi7' g/ Exhibit 2A — , Agency Administrator Date 1— Title V1 Assurances For Consultants, Contractors, Subcontractors, Suppliers, and Manufacturers Agency will insert or add the following clauses into every contract subject to the Act and Regulations associated with the receipt of federal financial assistance: During the performance of this contract, the contractor, for itself, its assignees and successors in interest (hereinafter referred to as the "contractor") agrees as follows: 1. Compliance With Regulations — The contractor shall comply with the Regulations Relative to Nondiscrimination in Federally -Assisted Programs of the Department of Transportation (hereinafter DOT), Title 49, Code of Federal Regulations, Part 21, as they may be amended from time to time, (hereinafter referred to as the Regulations), which are herein incorporated by reference and made a part of this contract. 2. Nondiscrimination — The contractor, with regard to the work performed during the contract, shall not discriminate on the grounds of race, color, sex, or national origin in the selection and retention of subcontractors, including procurement of materials and leases of equipment. The contractor shall not participate either directly or indirectly in the discrimination prohibited by Section 21.5 of the Regulations, including employment practices when the contract covers a program set forth in Appendix B of the Regulations. 3. Solicitations for Subcontracts, including Procurement of Materials and Equipment — In all solicitations either by competitive bidding or negotiations made by the contractor for work to be performed under a subcontract, including procurement of materials or leases of equipment, each potential subcontractor or supplier shall be notified by the contractor of the contractor's obligations under this contract and the Regulations relative to nondiscrimination on the ground of race, color, sex, or national origin. 4. Information and Reports — The contractor shall provide all information and reports required by the Regulations or directives issued pursuant thereto, and shall permit access to its books, records, accounts, other sources of information, and its facilities as may be determined by Agency or the Washington State Department of Transportation to be pertinent to ascertain compliance with such Regulations, orders and instructions. Where any information required of a contractor is in the exclusive possession of another who fails or refuses to furnish this information, the contractor shall so certify to Agency, or the Washington State Department of Transportation as appropriate, and shall set forth what efforts it has made to obtain the information. Page 18 February 2018 Page 28-24 WSDOT Local Agency Guidelines M 36-63.35 March 2018 Title VI Plan for Agencies Over 100,000 Population AGEND4 jeT .-#7. g) 5. Sanctions for Noncompliance — In the event of the contractor's noncompliance with the nondiscrimination provisions of this contract, Agency and the Washington State Department of Transportation shall impose such contract sanctions as it, or the Federal Highway Administration may determine to be appropriate, including, but not limited to: a. Withholding of payments to the contractor under the contract until the contractor complies, and/or; b. Cancellation, termination, or suspension of the contract, in whole or in part. 6. Incorporation of Provisions — The contractor shall include the provisions of paragraphs (1) through (6) in every subcontract, including procurement of materials and leases of equipment, unless exempt by the Regulations, or directives issued pursuant thereto. The contractor shall take such action with respect to any subcontractor or procurement as Agency or the U.S. Department of Transportation, Federal Highway Administration, may direct as a means of enforcing such provisions including sanctions for noncompliance. Provided, however, that in the event a contractor becomes involved in, or is threatened with, litigation with a subcontractor or supplier as a result of such direction, the contractor may request Agency enter into such litigation to protect the interests of the Agency and, in addition, the contractor may request the United States to enter into such litigation to protect the interests of the United States. February 2018 Page 19 WSDOT Local Agency Guidelines M 36-63.35 Page 28-25 March 2018 Appendix 28.71 Title Vl Plan for Agen+'Pob6,'68Jpi7' g/ Exhibit 2B — Granting and Habendum Clauses When Agency is the recipient of real property, structures or improvements thereon, or interest therein from the United States, the following clauses shall be included in any and all deeds affecting or recording the transfer ofproperty: GRANTING CLAUSE NOW, THEREFORE, Agency, as authorized by law, will accept title to the lands and maintain the project constructed thereon, in accordance with Title 23, United States Code, the Regulations for the Administration of Federal Aid for Highways and the policies and procedures prescribed by the Federal Highway Administration of the Department of Transportation and, also in accordance with and in compliance with all requirements imposed by or pursuant to Title 49, Code of Federal Regulations, Department of Transportation, Subtitle A, Office of the Secretary, Part 21, Non -Discrimination in Federally - Assisted Programs of the Department of Transportation (hereinafter referred to as the Regulations) pertaining to and effectuating the provisions of Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 (78 Stat. 252:42 USC 2000d to 2000d--4) does hereby remise, release, quitclaim, and convey unto Agency all the right, title, and interest of the Department of Transportation in and to said land described in Exhibit A attached hereto and made a part thereof. HABENDUM CLAUSE TO HAVE AND TO HOLD said lands and interests therein unto Agency, and its successors forever, subject, however, to the covenants, conditions, restrictions and reservations herein contained as follows, which will remain in effect for the period during which the real property or structures are used for a purpose for which the federal financial assistance is extended or for another purpose involving the provision of similar services or benefits and shall be binding on Agency, its successors, and assigns. Agency, in consideration of the conveyance of said lands and interests in lands, does hereby covenant and agree as a covenant running with the land for itself, its successors and assigns, that (1) no person shall on the grounds of race, color, sex, or national origin be excluded from participation in, be denied the benefits of, or be otherwise subjected to discrimination with regard to any facility located wholly or in part on, over, or under such lands hereby conveyed(,) (and)11 (2) that Agency, shall use the lands and interests in lands so conveyed, in compliance with all requirements imposed by or pursuant to Title 49, Code of Federal Regulations, Department of Transportation, Subtitle A, Office of the Secretary, Part 21, Non -Discrimination of Federally -Assisted Programs of the Department of Transportation --Effectuation of Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, and as said Regulations may be amended (,) and (3) that in the event of breach of any of the above mentioned nondiscrimination conditions, the Agency shall have a right to reenter said lands and facilities on said land, and the above described land and facilities shall thereon revert to and vest in and become the absolute property of the Department of Transportation and its assigns as such interest existed prior to this instruction. Reverter Clause and related language to be used only when it is determined that such a clause is necessary in order to effectuate the purposes of Title VI of Civil Rights Act of 1964. Page 20 February 2018 Page 28-26 WSDOT Local Agency Guidelines M 36-63.35 March 2018 Title VI Plan for Agencies Over 100,000 Population AGEND4JeT ._#7. g) Exhibit 2C — Lease/Deed Provisions Upon receipt of federal financial assistance to construct a facility or part of a facility, the Recipient agrees to include these clauses in all future deeds, licenses, leases, permits, or similar instruments entered into by Agency pursuant to the provisions of Title VI Assurances, item 7: The LESSEE, for himself or herself, his or her heirs, personal representatives, successors in interest, and assigns, as a part of the consideration hereof, does hereby covenant and agree as a covenant running with the land that in the event facilities are constructed, maintained, or otherwise operated on the said property described in this lease, for a purpose for which a US Department of Transportation program or activity is extended or for another purpose involving the provision of similar services or benefits, the LESSEE shall maintain and operate such facilities and services in compliance with all other requirements imposed pursuant to Title 49, Code of Federal Regulations, U.S. Department of Transportation, Subtitle A, Office of the Secretary, Part 21, Non -Discrimination in Federally -Assisted Programs of the U.S. Department of Transportation --Effectuation of Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as said Regulations may be amended. That in the event of breach of any of the above nondiscrimination covenants, the Agency shall have the right to terminate the lease, and to reenter and repossess said land and the facilities thereon, and hold the same as if said lease had never been made or issued. The following shall be included in all deeds, licenses, leases, permits, or similar agreements entered into by Agency pursuant to the provisions of Title VI Assurances, Item 7. The LESSEE, for himself or herself, his or her personal representatives, successors in interest, and assigns, as a part of the consideration hereof, does hereby covenant and agree as a covenant running with the land that (1) no person, on the grounds of race, color, sex, or national origin shall be excluded from participation in, be denied the benefits of, or be otherwise subjected to discrimination in the use of said facilities, (2) that in the construction of any improvements on, over or under such land and furnishing of services thereon, no person on the grounds of race, color, sex, or national origin shall be excluded from participation in, denied the benefits of, or otherwise be subjected to discrimination, (3) that the LESSEE shall use the premises in compliance with all requirements imposed by or pursuant to Title 49, Code of Federal Regulations, U.S. Department of Transportation, Subtitle A, Office of the Secretary, Part 21, Non -Discrimination in Federally -Assisted Programs of the U.S. Department of Transportation --Effectuation of Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, and as said Regulations may be amended. That in the event of breach of any of the above nondiscrimination covenants, the Agency shall have the right to terminate the lease, and to re-enter and repossess said land and the facilities thereon, and hold the same as if said lease had never been made or issued. February 2018 Page 21 WSDOT Local Agency Guidelines M 36-63.35 March 2018 Page 28-27 Appendix 28.71 Title VI Plan for Agent�'�bNb0,'68dF�i7' g/ Page 28-28 WSDOT Local Agency Guidelines M 36-63.35 March 2018 AGENDA ITEM #7. g) Appendix 28.72 Nondiscrimination Agreement Population Under 100,000 Nondiscrimination Agreement Population Under 100,000 Washington State Department of Transportation and Name of Recipient Policy Statement The (Name of Recipient), hereinafter referred to as the "Recipient" assures that no person shall on the grounds of race, color, national origin, or sex, as provided by Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, and the Civil Rights Restoration Act of 1987 (P.L. 100.259) be excluded from participation in, be denied the benefits of, or be otherwise subjected to discrimination under any program or activity. The Recipient further assures every effort will be made to ensure nondiscrimination in all of its programs and activities, whether those programs and activities are federally funded or not. The Civil Rights Restoration Act of 1987, broadened the scope of Title VI coverage by expanding the definition of terms "programs or activities" to include all programs or activities of federal aid recipients, sub -recipients, and contractors/consultants, whether such programs and activities are federally assisted or not (Public Law 100259 [S.557] March 22, 1988). In the event the Recipient distributes federal aid funds to a sub -recipient, the Recipient will include Title VI language in all written agreements and will monitor for compliance. The Recipient's (Name of person/division), is responsible for initiating and monitoring Title VI activities, preparing reports and other responsibilities as required by 23 Code of Federal Regulation(CFR) 200 and 49 Code of Federal Regulation 21. Signature Title Date Title VI Program Organization and Staffing Pursuant to 23 CFR 200, (Name of Recipient) has designated a Title VI Coordinator who is responsible for Attachment 1, which describes the hierarchy for (Name of Recipient)'s Title VI Program, including an organization's chart illustrating the level and placement of Title VI responsibilities. April 2014 Page 1 WSDOT Local Agency Guidelines M 36-63.35 Page 28-29 February 2018 Appendix 28.72 Nondiscrimination Agreemer�fbEW-t W_ t % f I Assurances 49 CFR Part 21.7 Page 2 The (Name of the Recipient), hereby gives assurances: 1. That no person shall on the grounds of race, color, national origin, and sex, be excluded from participation in, be denied the benefits of, or be otherwise subjected to discrimination under any program or activity conducted by the recipient regardless of whether those programs and activities are federally funded or not. Activities and programs which the recipient hereby agrees to carry out in compliance with Title VI and related statutes include but are not limited to: • List all major Transportation programs and activities of the recipient and Title VI responsibilities for each one of them. Include information as Attachment 2 to this Nondiscrimination Agreement. 2. That it will promptly take any measures necessary to effectuate this agreement. 3. That each Transportation program, activity, and facility (i.e., lands change to roadways, park and ride lots, etc.) as defined at 49 CFR 21.23(b) and (e), and the Civil Rights Restoration Act of 1987 will be (with regard to a program or activity) conducted, or will be (with regard to a facility) operated in compliance with the nondiscriminatory requirements imposed by, or pursuant to, this agreement. 4. That these assurances are given in consideration of and for the purpose of obtaining any and all federal grants, loans, contracts, property, discounts or other federal financial assistance extended after the date hereof to the recipient by the Washington State Department of Transportation (WSDOT) under the federally - funded program and is binding on it, other recipients, subgrantees, contractors, sub -contractors, transferees, successors in interest and other participants. The person or persons whose signatures appear below are authorized to sign these assurances on behalf of the Recipient. 5. That the Recipient shall insert the following notification in all solicitations for bids for work or material subject to the Regulations and made in connection with all federally -funded programs and, in all proposals for negotiated agreements. The Recipient, in accordance with Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, 78 Stat. 252, 42 U.S.C. 2000d to 2000d-4 and Title 49, Code of Federal Regulations, Department of Transportation, Subtitle A, Office of the Secretary, Part 21, Nondiscrimination in Federally -Assisted Programs of the Department of Transportation issued pursuant to such Act, hereby notifies all bidders that it will affirmatively ensure that in any contract entered into pursuant to this advertisement, disadvantaged business enterprises as defined at 49 CFR Part 26 will be afforded full opportunity to submit bids in response to this invitation and will not be discriminated against on the grounds of race, color, national origin, or sex in consideration for an award. April 2014 r_ Page 28-30 WSDOT Local Agency Guidelines M 36-63.35 February 2018 Nondiscrimination Agreement Population Under 100,000 d nENI APP&M7. 6. That the Recipient shall insert the clauses of Appendix 1 of this Agreement in every contract subject to the Act and the Regulations. 7. That the Recipient shall insert the clauses of Appendix 2 of this Agreement, as a covenant running with the land, in any deed from the United States effecting a transfer of real property, structures, or improvements thereon, or interest therein. 8. That the Recipient shall include the appropriate clauses set forth in Appendix 3 of this Agreement, as a covenant running with the land, in any future deeds, leases, permits, licenses, and similar agreements entered into by the Recipient with other parties: (a) for the subsequent transfer of real property acquired or improved under a federal aid program; and (b) for the construction or use of or access to space on, over or under real property acquired, or improved under a federal aid program. 9. The Recipient agrees that the United States has a right to seek judicial enforcement with regard to any matter arising under the Act, the Regulations, and this agreement. Implementation Procedures This agreement shall serve as the recipient's Title VI plan pursuant to 23 CFR 200 and 49 CFR 21. For the purpose of this agreement, "Federal Assistance" shall include: 1. Grants and loans of federal funds. 2. The grant or donation of federal property and interest in property. 3. The detail of federal personnel. 4. The sale and lease of, and the permission to use (on other than a casual or transient basis), Federal property or any interest in such property without consideration or at a nominal consideration, or at a consideration which is reduced for the purpose of assisting the recipient, or in recognition of the public interest to be served by such sale or lease to the recipient. 5. Any federal agreement, arrangement, or other contract which has as one of its purposes, the provision of assistance. The recipient shall: April 2014 1. Issue a policy statement, signed by the head of the recipient, which expresses its commitment to the nondiscrimination provisions of Title VI. The policy statement shall be circulated throughout the recipient's organization and to the general public. Such information shall be published where appropriate in languages other than English. 2. Take affirmative action to correct any deficiencies found by WSDOT or the United States Department of Transportation (USDOT) within a reasonable time period, not to exceed 90 days, in order to implement Title VI compliance in accordance with this agreement. The head of the recipient shall be held responsible for implementing Title VI requirements. Page 3 r- WSDOT Local Agency Guidelines M 36-63.35 Page 28-31 February 2018 Appendix 28.72 Nondiscrimination Agreemer�fbEW-t W_ t % f I Page 4 3. Designate a civil rights coordinator who has a responsible position in the organization and easy access to the head of the recipient. The civil rights coordinator shall be responsible for initiating and monitoring Title VI activities and preparing required reports. 4. The civil rights coordinator shall adequately implement the civil rights requirements. 5. Process complaints of discrimination consistent with the provisions contained in this agreement. Investigations shall be conducted by civil rights personnel trained in discrimination complaint investigation. Identify each complainant by race, color, national origin or sex, the nature of the complaint, the date the complaint was filed, the date the investigation was completed, the disposition, the date of the disposition, and other pertinent information. A copy of the complaint, together with a copy of the recipient's report of investigation, will be forwarded to WSDOT's Office of Equal Opportunity (OEO) within 10 days of the date the complaint was received by the recipient. 6. Collect statistical data (race, color, national origin, sex) of participants in, and beneficiaries of the Transportation programs and activities conducted by the recipient. 7. Conduct Title VI reviews of the recipient and sub -recipient contractor/consultant program areas and activities. Revise where applicable, policies, procedures and directives to include Title VI requirements. 8. Attend training programs on Title VI and related statutes conducted by WSDOT OEO. 9. Prepare a yearly report of Title VI accomplishments for the last year and goals for the next year. This report is due one year from the date of approval of the Nondiscrimination Agreement and then annually on the same date. a. Annual Work Plan — Outline Title VI monitoring and review activities planned for the coming year; state by which each activity will be accomplished and target date for completion. b. Accomplishment Report — List major accomplishments made regarding Title VI activities. Include instances where Title VI issues were identified and discrimination was prevented. Indicate activities and efforts the Title VI Coordinator and program area personnel have undertaken in monitoring Title VI. Include a description of the scope and conclusions of any special reviews (internal or external) conducted by the Title VI Coordinator. List any major problem(s) identified and corrective action taken. Include a summary and status report on any Title VI complaints filed with the recipient. April 2014 r_ Page 28-32 WSDOT Local Agency Guidelines M 36-63.35 February 2018 Nondiscrimination Agreement Population Under 100,000 d nENI APP&#7. Discrimination Complaint Procedure April 2014 1. Any person who believes that he or she, individually, as a member of any specific class, or in connection with any disadvantaged business enterprise, has been subjected to discrimination prohibited by Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, the American with Disabilities Act of 1990, Section 504 of the Vocational Rehabilitation Act of 1973 and the Civil Rights Restoration Act of 1987, as amended, may file a complaint with the recipient. A complaint may also be filed by a representative on behalf of such a person. All complaints will be referred to the recipient's Title VI Coordinator for review and action. 2. In order to have the complaint consideration under this procedure, the complainant must file the complaint no later than 180 days after: a. The date of alleged act of discrimination; or b. Where there has been a continuing course of conduct, the date on which that conduct was discontinued. In either case, the recipient or his/her designee may extend the time for filing or waive the time limit in the interest of justice, specifying in writing the reason for so doing. 3. Complaints shall be in writing and shall be signed by the complainant and/or the complainant's representative. Complaints shall set forth as fully as possible the facts and circumstances surrounding the claimed discrimination. In the event that a person makes a verbal complaint of discrimination to an officer or employee of the recipient, the person shall be interviewed by the Title VI Coordinator. If necessary, the Title VI Coordinator will assist the person in reducing the complaint to writing and submit the written version of the complaint to the person for signature. The complaint shall then be handled according to the recipient's investigative procedures. 4. Within 10 days, the Title VI Coordinator will acknowledge receipt of the allegation, inform the complainant of action taken or proposed action to process the allegation, and advise the complainant of other avenues of redress available, such as WSDOT and USDOT. 5. The recipient will advise WSDOT within 10 days of receipt of the allegations. Generally, the following information will be included in every notification to WSDOT: a. Name, address, and phone number of the complainant. b. Name(s) and address(es) of alleged discriminating official(s). c. Basis of complaint (i.e., race, color, national origin, or sex) d. Date of alleged discriminatory act(s). e. Date of complaint received by the recipient. i A statement of the complaint. g. Other agencies (state, local, or federal) where the complaint has been filed. h. An explanation of the actions the recipient has taken or proposed to resolve the issue raised in the complaint. Page 5 r- WSDOT Local Agency Guidelines M 36-63.35 Page 28-33 February 2018 Appendix 28.72 Nondiscrimination Agreemer�fbEW-t W- t % f I 6. Within 60 days, the Title VI Coordinator will conduct an investigation of the allegation and based on the information obtained, will render a recommendation for action in a report of findings to the head of the recipient. The complaint should be resolved by informal means whenever possible. Such informal attempts and their results will be summarized in the report of findings. 7. Within 90 days of receipt of the complaint, the head of the recipient will notify the complainant in writing of the final decision reached, including the proposed disposition of the matter. The notification will advise the complainant of his/ her appeal rights with WSDOT, or USDOT, if they are dissatisfied with the final decision rendered by the Recipient. The Title VI Coordinator will also provide WSDOT with a copy of this decision and summary of findings upon completion of the investigation. 8. Contacts for the different Title VI administrative jurisdictions are as follows: Washington State Department of Transportation Office of Equal Opportunity, Title VI Program PO Box 47314 Olympia, WA 98466 360-705-7098 Federal Highway Administration Washington Division Office 711 Capitol Way South, Suite 501 Olympia, WA 98501 360-534-9325 Page 6 April 2014 r— Page 28-34 WSDOT Local Agency Guidelines M 36-63.35 February 2018 Nondiscrimination Agreement Population Under 100,000 d nENI IQp Nl7. Sanctions In the event the recipient fails or refuses to comply with the terms of this agreement, WSDOT may take any or all of the following actions: 1. Cancel, terminate, or suspend this agreement in whole or in part; 2. Refrain from extending any further assistance to the recipient under the program from which the failure or refusal occurred until satisfactory assurance of future compliance has been received from the recipient. 3. Take such other action that may be deemed appropriate under the circumstances, until compliance or remedial action has been accomplished by the recipient. 4. Refer the case to the Department of Justice for appropriate legal proceedings. WASHINGTON STATE DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION: Signature Director of the Office of Equal Opportunity Title Date NAME OF RECIPIENT: Signature Title Date April 2014 Page 7 I- WSDOT Local Agency Guidelines M 36-63.35 Page 28-35 February 2018 Appendix 28.72 Nondiscrimination Agreemer�fbEW-t W_ t % f I%• �� Appendix 1 Page 8 During the performance of this contract, the contractor/consultant, for itself, its assignees and successors in interest (hereinafter referred to as the "contractor") agrees as follows: 1. Compliance With Regulations — The contractor shall comply with the Regulations relative to nondiscrimination in federally -assisted programs of United States Department of Transportation (USDOT), Title 49, Code of Federal Regulations, Part 21, as they may be amended from time to time, (hereinafter referred to as the Regulations), which are herein incorporated by reference and made a part of this contract. 2. Nondiscrimination — The contractor, with regard to the work performed by it during the contract, shall not discriminate on the grounds of race, color, sex, or national origin in the selection and retention of sub -contractors, including procurement of materials and leases of equipment. The contractor shall not participate either directly or indirectly in the discrimination prohibited by Section 21.5 of the Regulations, including employment practices when the contract covers a program set forth in Appendix B of the Regulations. 3. Solicitations for Subcontracts, Including Procurement of Materials and Equipment — In all solicitations either by competitive bidding or negotiations made by the contractor for work to be performed under a sub -contract, including procurement of materials or leases of equipment, each potential sub -contractor or supplier shall be notified by the contractor of the contractor's obligations under this contract and the Regulations relative to nondiscrimination on the grounds of race, color, sex, or national origin. 4. Information and Reports — The contractor shall provide all information and reports required by the Regulations or directives issued pursuant thereto, and shall permit access to its books, records, accounts, other sources of information, and its facilities as may be determined by the contracting agency or the appropriate federal agency to be pertinent to ascertain compliance with such Regulations, orders and instructions. Where any information required of a contractor is in the exclusive possession of another who fails or refuses to furnish this information, the contractor shall so certify to WSDOT or the USDOT as appropriate, and shall set forth what efforts it has made to obtain the information. 5. Sanctions for Noncompliance — In the event of the contractor's noncompliance with the nondiscrimination provisions of this contract, the contracting agency shall impose such contract sanctions as it or the USDOT may determine to be appropriate, including, but not limited to: • Withholding of payments to the contractor under the contract until the contractor complies, and/or; • Cancellation, termination, or suspension of the contract, in whole or in part April 2014 Page 28-36 WSDOT Local Agency Guidelines M 36-63.35 February 2018 Nondiscrimination Agreement Population Under 100,000 d nENI APP&M7. 6. Incorporation of Provisions — The contractor shall include the provisions of paragraphs (1) through (5) in every subcontract, including procurement of materials and leases of equipment, unless exempt by the Regulations, or directives issued pursuant thereto. The contractor shall take such action with respect to any sub- contractor or procurement as the contracting agency or USDOT may direct as a means of enforcing such provisions including sanctions for noncompliance. Provided, however, that in the event a contractor becomes involved in, or is threatened with, litigation with a sub -contractor or supplier as a result of such direction, the contractor may request WSDOT enter into such litigation to protect the interests of the state and, in addition, the contractor may request the USDOT enter into such litigation to protect the interests of the United States. April 2014 Page 9 I- WSDOT Local Agency Guidelines M 36-63.35 Page 28-37 February 2018 Appendix 28.72 Nondiscrimination Agreemer�fbEW-t W_ t % f I Appendix 2 Page 10 The following clauses shall be included in any and all deeds affecting or recording the transfer of real property, structures or improvements thereon, or interest therein from the United States. GRANTING CLAUSE NOW THEREFORE, Department of Transportation, as authorized by law, and upon the condition that the state of Washington will accept title to the lands and maintain the project constructed thereon, in accordance with Title 23, United States Code, the Regulations for the Administration of Federal Aid for Highways and the policies and procedures prescribed by the United States Department of Transportation and, also in accordance with and in compliance with all requirements imposed by or pursuant to Title 49, Code of Federal Regulations, Department of Transportation, Subtitle A, the Department of Transportation WSDOT (hereinafter referred to as the Regulations) pertaining to and effectuating the provisions of Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 (78 Stat. 252: 42 USC 2000d to 2000d - 4) does hereby remise, release, quitclaim, and convey unto the state of Washington all the right, title, and interest of the Department of Transportation in and to said land described in Exhibit A attached hereto and made a part thereof. HABENDUM CLAUSE TO HAVE AND TO HOLD said lands and interests therein unto the state of Washington, and its successors forever, subject, however, to the covenants, conditions, restrictions and reservations herein contained as follows, which will remain in effect for the period during which the real property or structures are used for a purpose for which the federal financial assistance is extended or for another purpose involving the provisions of similar services or benefits and shall be binding on the state of Washington, its successors, and assigns. The state of Washington, in consideration of the conveyance of said lands and interests in lands, does hereby covenant and agree as a covenant running with the land for itself, its successors and assigns, that (1) no person shall on the grounds of race, color, sex or national origin, be excluded from participation in, be denied the benefits of, or be otherwise subject to discrimination with regard to any facility located wholly or in part on, over, or under such lands hereby conveyed (,)(and)* (2) that the state of Washington, shall use the lands and interests in lands so conveyed, in compliance with all requirements imposed by or pursuant to Title 49, Code of Federal Regulations, Department of Transportation, Subtitle A, Office of the Secretary, Part 21, Non -Discrimination of Federally -Assisted Programs of the Department of Transportation -- Effectuation of Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, and as said Regulations may be amended (,) and (3) that in the event of breach of any of the above mentioned nondiscrimination conditions, the department shall have a right to reenter said lands and facilities on said land, and the above described land and facilities shall thereon revert to and vest in and become the absolute property of the Department of Transportation and its assigns as such interest existed prior to this instruction. April 2014 Page 28-38 WSDOT Local Agency Guidelines M 36-63.35 February 2018 Nondiscrimination Agreement Population Under 100,000 d nENI APP&M7. Appendix 3 The following clauses shall be included in all transportation related deeds, licenses, leases, permits, or similar instruments entered into by (Recipient) pursuant to the provisions of Assurance 8. The LESSEE, for himself or herself, his or her heirs, personal representatives, successors in interest, and assigns, as a part of the consideration hereof, does hereby covenant and agree as a covenant running with the land that in the event facilities are constructed, maintained, or otherwise operated on the said property described in this lease, for a purpose of which a Department of Transportation program or activity is extended or for another purpose involving the provision of similar services or benefits, the LESSEE shall maintain and operate such facilities and services in compliance with all other requirements imposed pursuant to Title 49, Code of Federal Regulations, Department of Transportation, Subtitle A, Office of the Secretary, Part 21, Nondiscrimination in Federally -Assisted Programs of the Department of Transportation --Effectuation of Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as said Regulations may be amended. That in the event of breach of any of the above nondiscrimination covenants, the STATE shall have the right to terminate the lease, and to reenter and repossess said land and the facilities thereon, and hold the same as if said lease has never been made or issued. The following shall be included in all deeds, licenses, leases, permits, or similar agreements entered into by the Washington State Department of Transportation pursuant to the provisions of Assurance 8. The LESSEE, or himself or herself, his or her personal representatives, successors in interest, and assigns, as a part of the consideration hereof, does hereby covenant and agree as a covenant running with the land that (1) no person, on the grounds of race, color, sex, or national origin, shall be excluded from participation in, be denied the benefits of, or be otherwise subjected to discrimination in the use of said facilities, (2) that in the construction of any improvements on, over or under such land and furnishing of services thereon, no person on the grounds of race, color, sex, and national origin shall be excluded from participation in, denied the benefits of, or otherwise be subjected to discrimination, (3) that the LESSEE shall use the premises in compliance with all requirements imposed by or pursuant to Title 49, Code of Federal Regulations, Department of Transportation, Subtitle A, Office of the Secretary, Part 21, Nondiscrimination in Federally -Assisted Programs of the Department of Transportation --Effectuation of Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, and as said Regulations may be amended. That in the event of breach of any of the above nondiscrimination covenants, the STATE shall have the right to terminate the lease, and to reenter and repossess said land and the facilities thereon, and hold the same as if said lease had never been made or issued. Reverter Clause and related language to be used only when it is determined that such a clause is necessary in order to effectuate the purpose of Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964. April 2014 Page 11 i_ WSDOT Local Agency Guidelines M 36-63.35 Page 28-39 February 2018 Appendix 28.72 Nondiscrimination Agreemer�fbEW-t W- t % f I Page 28-40 WSDOT Local Agency Guidelines M 36-63.35 February 2018 AGENDA ITEM #7. g) Annual Report for Agency With Appendix 28.73 Population Over 100,000 - Example Annual Report for Agency With Population Over 100,000 — Example Section I Policy Statement A copy of Title VI Policy Statement is attached in Appendix of this report. Section II Organization, Staffing, and Structure A. Organization Outline your organization and how it works with your Title VI Policy. B. Staffing Describe your agency staff and how they interact in the program. C. Structure Describe the Structure of your program, the following is an example only. Your agency may have a different approach. Table II.C.1 shows Title VI Special Emphasis Program Area Liaisons within XYZ Agency. For this update, program area elements include planning, location, design, environmental services, real estate services (right of way), construction, and education and training. The program area liaisons work directly with the Title VI Specialist in the Office of the Title VI Coordinator. All liaison positions have been filled at this time. DOT 140-561 Page 1 of 17 10/2015 Table II.C.1 —Title VI Special Emphasis Program Area Liaisons Name Gender/ Ethnicity Title Program John Smith Male/Caucasian Managing Engineer Engineering/Planning/Design and (example only) Construction Mary Ramirez Female/Hispanic Project/Program Education/Training for Construction (example) Manager III Program Analyst IV Education/Training for Administration Program Analyst IV Education/Training for Maintenance Project/Program Manager III Education/Training for Construction Program Analyst IV Education/Training for Administration WSDOT Local Agency Guidelines M 36-63.29 October 2015 Page 28-41 Title VI Program Annual Report for Agency With Population Over 100,000 — Example AGENQpJ. W 7• g) Section III Title VI Monitoring and Review Process A. Actions to Promote Internal and External Compliance With Title VI List actions, meetings, scheduled events, etc., that help your agency promote both internal and external compliance with Title VI program. Internal — In detail explain your agency's activities and interaction within your organization in this area. External — Detailed explanation of your agency's activities outside the agency that promote your Title VI program. B. Title VI Compliance Reviews During This Report Period • List and bullet reviews conducted during the past year, name the reviewers and dates of the reviews. Section IV Title VI Complaints During This Report Period Either: "Received no complaints against the (Agency Name and Division) in the fiscal year 2003-2004." OR something like: "The two complaints alleged one incident of denial of bus services by the (Agency Name and Division). The complaints alleged discrimination based on race. (Agency Name) resolved these cases. Section V Accomplishment Report for Each Program Area The following information describes the location of the major program functions within (Your Agency Name) and identifies accomplishments, applicable operational guidelines, process, and responsibilities of the various sections. Appendix lists staff summarized by gender and race for the following Special Emphasis areas: Planning, Design, Construction, Maintenance Services, and Environmental. A. Planning Example — The Road Services Division is responsible for developing short and long-range plans that provide efficient transportation services to the citizens of (Agency Name). Division staff coordinates with other government agencies, private groups, and the public to develop comprehensive plans that meet the transportation needs of (Agency Name). The Division provides staff and technical assistance to regional transportation groups and serves as liaison for planning with the Puget Sound Regional Council. A.1 Number of Consultant Projects for Planning Awarded During This Reporting Period and Dollar Value — No consultant contracts for planning were awarded during FY 2004. A.2 Efforts Made to Utilize Minority and Female Consultants and Subconsultants in Federally -Assisted Contracts — It is the policy of (Agency Name) to comply with 49 Code of Federal Regulations, Part 26, to ensure that Disadvantaged Businesses, including minorities and women, have an equal opportunity to receive and participate in federally -assisted contracts. (Agency) does not exclude any person from participation in, deny any person the benefits of, or otherwise discriminate in connection with the award or performance of any contract covered by 49 CFR Part 26 on the basis of race, color, sex, or national origin. Efforts made to use minority and female consultants during FY 2004 include the following outreach activities: DOT 140-561 Page 2 of 17 10/2015 I� Page 28-42 WSDOT Local Agency Guidelines M 36-63.29 October 2015 Chapter 28 Appendix 28.73 Annual Report for Agency With PopulatlAQfe►r'1g 'd&v1ffr %. g/ • Disadvantaged Business Enterprise (DBE) Goals — As part of (Agency Name) outreach efforts to use minority and female consultants, when appropriate, proposals include a Disadvantaged Business Enterprise (DBE) goal. Certified DBE firms can encompass small, minority and women -owned firms. As a condition of award, the successful bidder must make good faith efforts to meet this DBE goal. The proposer establishes good faith efforts when it documents that it has obtained enough DBE participation to meet the DBE goal; or documents that it has made adequate efforts to do so although unsuccessful. • Consultants Selection Procedures — Consultants are selected according to the procedures outlined in the RCW, and Local Agency Guidelines procedures for federally -assisted projects. (Agency Name) encourages all consultant firms that are registered in Washington State to conduct business and who possess the requisite professional license(s) to present their qualifications for highway design projects. The (Agency Name) solicits firms for inclusion on the Architecture and Engineering, Professional Services, and the Construction Small Works Rosters in accordance with RCW 39.80 and (Agency Name) practices. (Agency Name) places an advertisement in various news media to include the (Names of Publications) and various minority newspapers that have existing contracts with the Agency. Advertisement is conducted a least twice during a year to encourage consultant firms to apply for placement on the rosters. • Public Pre -Proposal Meetings — Other outreach efforts to support the use of minority and female consultants include conducting public pre -proposal meetings to provide information concerning the scope of work and available subcontracting opportunities associated with projects. These meetings are open to all interested parties. A.3 Studies Conducted Which Provide Data Relative to Minority Persons, Neighborhoods, Income Levels, Physical Environments, and Travel Habits — The agency will continue to review all proposed projects for their potential to have a disproportionate impact on low-income and minority populations that are subject to additional consideration in accordance with applicable Title VI and Environmental Justice provisions. (Agency Name) unincorporated areas do not typically require substantial analysis to determine that the potentially affected areas do not meet thresholds for consideration as low-income or minority communities. However, (Specific Project name if applicable), does require such analysis. A.4 Hearings Held During the Report Period and Efforts Utilized to Ensure Citizen Participation, Particularly Minorities, and Women — The Number of These Individuals and the Capacity of Their Participation — No hearings were conducted in FFY 2004. There were seven community advisory group meetings and one other public meeting conducted. (Agency Name) continues to use the Washington State Department of Transportation (WSDOT) form for collecting data on public hearing and public meeting attendees for Title VI reporting requirements, per Title 23, Code of Federal Regulations, Part 200.9(b)(4). See Appendix for a copy of the form used by (Agency Name) at its public meetings. Appendix summarizes the forms collected during FFY 2004. B. Location DOT 140-561 10/2015 (Agency Name) emphasis over the past several years has been the improvement of existing Rights of Way and corridors. There has been no activity in the (Agency Name)'s Location Program. When future corridors are considered, the Location Program will be one of the tools used by the (Agency Name) to help determine their feasibility. BA Number of Complaints Filed —None during this report period. Page 3 of 17 r_ WSDOT Local Agency Guidelines M 36-63.29 October 2015 Page 28-43 Title VI Program Annual Report for Agency With Population Over 100,000 — Example AGENQpJ. X T g) B.2 Identification of Titles, Ethnicity, and Gender of Employees in the Location Program — Not applicable this reporting period. Agency Name currently has no staff assigned to location duties since there has been no activity in that area. B.3 Number of Environmental Impact Statements Reviewed During the Report Period, Including a Summary of Comments on EIS Where Minority, Handicapped, Elderly, Etc., Communities Were Adversely Impacted — None during this report period. BA Number of Consultants Contracts Involving Project Development Activities —None during this report period. B.5 Number of Public Hearings Held During the Report Period Concerning Location of a Project, Including How the Hearings Were Advertised and Notification to Minorities — None during this report period. B.6 Encouragement of Minority Leaders to Provide Suggestions and Ask Questions on Location of Highways — Not applicable during this report period. No new highways were located during this report period. B.7 Need to Use Bilingual Advertisements, Announcements, Notices, Etc., During the Report Period — None during this report period. C. Design Design activities are performed by (fill in appropriate information about your design process. C.1 Number of Consulting Firms With Design Contracts, Including the Number of These Contracts Held by Minority Firms and Women -Owned Firms/Dollar Value — For FFY 2004, 23 consulting firms were engaged in design contracts. For reporting purposes, work order and task order contracts that have multiple awards are considered contracts awarded. The accompanying tables summarize the number of contracts awarded, including work order and task order contracts, and the sum of those contract awards by prime and subconsultant. Table V.C.1 provides the number of contracts and total dollar value awarded to minority firms and women -owned firms as prime consultants with design contracts. Table V.C.1 —Design Contracts -Prime Name of Firm Certification Status Ethnicity #Contracts Awarded (includes work and task orders) Sum of Contract Awards (rounded to nearest thousand) Table V.C.2 —Minority, Women -Owned Firms With Consultant Subcontracts Name of Firm Certification Status Ethnicity # Contracts Awarded (includes work and task orders) Sum of Contract Awards (rounded to nearest thousand) Page 28-44 WSDOT Local Agency Guidelines M 36-63.29 October 2015 Chapter 28 Appendix 28.73 Annual Report for Agency With PopulatlAQfe►r'1g 'd&vJffr %. g/ C.2 Efforts to Increase Minority and Female Participation in Obtaining Consultant Contracts • Procurement Information System — (Agency Name) requests Letters of Interest, Statement of Qualifications and Proposals from all firms qualified and interested in providing professional services for contracts awarded by the (Agency Name). (Agency Name) posts information on current Requests for Proposals on its Internet Website. Proposals identify the types of sub consulting opportunities that may be available on the project for informational purposes. • Advertisement in Local Papers and Agency Procurement Website — (Agency Name) advertises Requests for Proposals for consulting services in local papers and on its Procurement Website. The scope, size and duration of these contracts vary in size to promote diversity in the number and size of firms competing for these awards. Some contracts are for complete design services on a single project. Others maybe for environmental reviews, traffic analysis, mediators or a wide range of professional services. (Agency Name) solicits some small A&E contracts (under $150K) from Consultants using its A&E Roster. • Advance Information on Upcoming Contract Opportunities — During Federal Fiscal Year 2004, (Agency Name) efforts to use minority and female consultants included providing advance information on upcoming contract opportunities to DBE's to include small, minority and women -owned businesses. Describe Agency involvement in this area. • Newsletter Distribution — Describe activities that may pertain to this type of information. • Grassroots Level Outreach Efforts — Describe any activities that your agency has conducted in this arena. • Office of Business Relations and Economic Development — Describe any activity this type of division may undertake in your community. • Collaboration With Other Local Governments — Description of activity. C.3 Public Hearings Held During the Design Phase of Any Highway — Description of any activity in this area. CA Employees in the Design Program Area, including Ethnicity and Sex, Including Efforts to Increase Minority and Female Representation Where (low, high?) — See Appendix for information on employees. During this report period, recruitment staff in the Design area actively participated in the following job fairs and forums: List participation if relevant. C.5 Complaints Filed in the Design Program Area — None during this report period. C.6 Significant Problem Areas, Accomplishments, and Actions to Take During the Ensuing Year — No significant problem areas were identified during this report period. D. Environmental Unit The Environmental Unit of the (Agency Name) works to ensure the promotion of environmental integrity in the design, construction, and maintenance of transportation systems that serve the needs of the Agency's various communities. This section responds to the requirements of the DOT 140-561 Page 5 of 17 10/2015 r_ WSDOT Local Agency Guidelines M 36-63.29 October 2015 Page 28-45 Title VI Program Annual Report for Agency With Population Over 100,000 — Example AGENQpJ. X T g) National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) and the State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA) to ensure that projects undertaken by (Agency Name) meet these provisions, as required by Washington State and the Federal Government. During FFY 2004, the (Agency Name, Division, Section) conducted ( ) NEPA and ( ) SEPA environmental reviews. The completed environmental reviews did not identify impacts to minority or economically disadvantaged communities. During FYE 2003 staff from (Agency Name) and WSDOT completed the technical studies pertaining to socio-economic impacts and Title VI/Environmental Justice considerations. The results from those studies have been incorporated into the draft review versions of the Draft EIS. Those initial drafts have been revised to clarify Title VI/Environmental Justice information and address specific comments from WSDOT. Following its approval by WSDOT and FHWA, (Agency Name) anticipates issuing the Draft EIS in 2005. See Appendix for the list of names for each project that was subject to an environmental review during FY 2004. A copy of the SEPA exemption determination and determination of nonsignificance is included for each project. E. Real Estate Services (Right of Way) DOT 140-561 10/2015 Describe your Agency Real Estate Services Responsibility in the Title VI Plan. The property acquisition process follows the Right of Way Manual M 26-01 and all applicable laws and regulations, including Title VI and Section 504. The acquisition process includes appraisal of property, negotiation of terms and conditions for acquisition, and relocation assistance, as well as property management. EA Civil Rights Complaints in the following Real Estate Services (Right of Way) Areas E. l.a. Appraisals —None during this report period. E.1.b. Negotiations — None during this report period. E. l.c. Relocation Assistance and Payments —None during this report period. E.l.d. Property Management —None during this report period. E.2 Number of Appraisers Utilized During the Reporting Period — During FFY 2004, four appraisers were utilized, two females, two males and no minorities. The appraisers are (Firm Name or Agency Name) employees. Decisions to obtain new appraisers are based on need and vacancies. There are no vacancies at this time. There were no contracts for appraisers during this reporting period. E.3 Number of Negotiations During the Report Period and Disparity in Contract Negotiations Between Minorities and Non -Minorities — There were negotiations during this report period. No disparity in contract negotiations was noted. EA Concerns Raised by Minorities or Women Regarding Their Options in the Negotiation Phase — None during this report period. E.5 Number of Relocations During the Report Period — There were no relocations during FFY 2004. E.6 Concerns Raised by Minorities or Women on Replacement Housing, Referral Housing, and Advisory Services — None. E.7 Opportunities for Minorities and Women to Obtain Contracts Awarded for Providing Relocation Assistance — In-house relocation assistance services are conducted according to the rules guidelines of the federal Uniform Relocation Act (CFR24), RCW 8.26, and the WSDOT Page 6 of 17 Page 28-46 WSDOT Local Agency Guidelines M 36-63.29 October 2015 Chapter 28 Appendix 28.73 Annual Report for Agency With PopulatlAQfe►r'1g 'd&v1ffr %. g/ relocation manual and LAG agreement. Staff attend project open houses to present relocation services and benefits, and later meet individually with affected relocatees to negotiate and finalize benefit awards. F. Construction and Maintenance Services The Construction Services Group provides guidance and oversight for the administration of transportation construction projects. The (Agency Name) Road Maintenance Operations Section is responsible for the preservation and upkeep of roads and bridges. F.1 Civil Right Complaints Involving Competitive Bidding Procedures — There were no complaints involving competitive bidding procedures during the reporting period. F.2 Summary of Efforts Made by the Title VI Coordinator to Encourage the Use of Minority Individuals, Firms, or Agencies to Obtain Maintenance Agreements or Contracts — Summarize your Agency's effort in this area. F.3 Procedures Reviewed to Assure Subcontract Agreements, First and Second Tier, Material Supply and Equipment Lease Agreements During the Report Period — Description of your Agency procedures. FA Significant Accomplishments and/or Action Items for the Ensuing Year — Continue monitoring disadvantaged, minority, women, and small business participation in (Agency Name) Road construction contracting. G. Education and Training GA During the Reporting Period, Efforts Made to Encourage Participation by Minorities and Women in the NHI's Educational Program — Description of this activity, if applicable G.2 Types of NHI Sponsored Programs and Number of (Agency Name) Participants, Including Minorities and Women — Description of activity in this area by your Agency. G.3 Identify Staff Responsible for Training by Job Title, Ethnicity, and Gender — Staff within (Agency Name) Office of Civil Rights (Agency Name) provides guidance to departments on their responsibilities and reporting requirements for Title VI. Table V.G.1 shows staff responsible for Title VI training to departments by job title, ethnicity, and gender. GA Civil Rights Complaints Filed Concerning Training and Educational Opportunities and any Corrective Actions Taken — No complaints were filed during this reporting period. H. Administration HA List of Employees by Ethnicity and Gender in Each of the Title VI Program Areas — Please refer Appendix for a summarization of the ethnicity and gender of employees in the respective program areas. H.2 Summarize All Activities Undertaken During the Reporting Period Which Provide for DOT 140-561 Page 7 of 17 10/2015 Table V.G.1 —Title VI Training Staff Within the Office of the Title VI Coordinator Name Job Title Ethnicity Gender Title VI Coordinator Caucasian Female Civil Rights Specialist African -American Male i_ WSDOT Local Agency Guidelines M 36-63.29 October 2015 Page 28-47 Title VI Program Annual Report for Agency With Population Over 100,000 — Example AGENQpJ. X T g) Assurances of Title VI Compliance With Contractors, and by Contractors (i.e., are Title VI compliance included in all contracts and consultant agreements; were reviews made to ensure contractors and consultants are adhering to Title VI requirements; are contractors and/or consultants appraised of Title VI implications and issues) — The following is a summary of activities undertaken during the reporting period that provide for assurances of Title VI compliance with contractors, and by contractors. • Title VI Training • Dissemination of (Agency Name) Title VI Policy Statement — (Agency Name) Title VI Policy Statement is included in a post award packet of informational materials that the Agency Name sends to prime contractors. The post award packet includes information on the (Agency Name) reporting requirements and is sent to all prime contractors for each contract that has been publicly bid and advertised. • Title VI Provisions in All (Agency Name) Federally Funded Contracts — All federally funded contracts administered by (Agency Name) contain Title VI provisions (FHWA form 1273). • Analysis Worksheet Reviews for All Advertised Construction Bids and Proposals — SAMPLE: "Contract Compliance Specialists located in the Business Development and Contract Compliance Office receive and review Subcontracting/Apprenticeship Availability Analysis Worksheets for projects advertised for construction bids. The worksheet identifies the specific scopes of work, if any, which may be available for performance by subcontractors. Specifications (FHWA form 1273) defining Title VI requirements are included in the contract documents with a requirement that these provisions be included in all amendments, supplements and lower tier contracts entered into by the contractor. (Contract documents also include GSP 01-07.11 language relating to the Requirements for Nondiscrimination.) Goals are established for the participation of Disadvantaged Business Enterprises, where applicable." • Public Pre -Proposal Meetings — No public pre -proposal meetings were held during this reporting period. • Inclusion of Goals on Federally -Assisted Contracts — Staff in the (Section of your Agency) review federally -assisted contracts for DBE goals. • Nondiscrimination Provisions in Contracts — All (Agency Name) contracts, including federally -assisted contracts, contain nondiscrimination provisions to ensure and heighten awareness that (Agency Name) will not tolerate discriminatory practices. H.3 Title VI Training During the Period — Table V.H.3 lists the FFY 2004 Title VI training/meetings and attendees. Table V. H.3 — Title VI Trainings/Meetings Date Type of Training Audience DOT 140-561 Page 8 of 17 10/2015 Page 28-48 WSDOT Local Agency Guidelines M 36-63.29 October 2015 Chapter 28 Appendix 28.73 Annual Report for Agency With PopulatlAQfe►r'1g 'd&vJffr %. g/ Appendix A Form — Title VI Compliance Statement for use in public meetings/hearings Voluntary Title VI Public Involvement Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 requires (Agency Name) to gather statistical data on participants and beneficiaries of the agency's federal aid highway programs and activities. (Agency Name) collects information on race, color, national origin and gender of the attendees to this public meeting to ensure the inclusion of all segments of the population affected by a proposed proj ect. (Agency Name) wishes to clarify that this information gathering process is completely voluntary and that you are not required to disclose the statistical data requested in order to participate in this meeting. This form is a public document. The completed forms will be held on file in (Agency Name) Department of Transportation. For further information regarding this process, please contact the Title VI Coordinator by phone at or email at Please respond to the following questions: Project Name Date Meeting Location Name (please print) Gender ❑ Male ❑ Female General ethnic identification categories (check one): ❑ Caucasian ❑ Hispanic American ❑ American Indian/Alaskan Native ❑ African American ❑ Asian/Pacific Islander ❑ Other Color National Origin After you complete this form, please fold it and place it inside the designated box on the registration table. Thank you for your cooperation! Appendix B The following table summarizes staff gender and race by the respective program areas. DOT 140-561 10/2015 Page 9 of 17 WSDOT Local Agency Guidelines M 36-63.29 October 2015 Page 28-49 Title VI Program AGENQ�W �• g) Annual Report for Agency With Population Over 100,000 — Example i Page 28-50 WSDOT Local Agency Guidelines M 36-63.29 October 2015 Chapter 28 Appendix 28.73 Annual Report for Agency With PopulatlAQfe►r'1g 'd&vJffr %. g/ WSDOT Local Agency Guidelines M 36-63.29 Page 28-51 October 2015 Title VI Program Annual Report for Agency With Population Over 100,000 — Example AGENQpJ. X T g) Appendix D (Agency Name) Title VI Implementation Plan Revised September 2004 1. Internal Dissemination Goal — To complete internal dissemination of (Agency Name)'s revised Title VI Plan and FFY 2004 Title VI Update Report before December 1, 2004. (Agency Name)'s Title VI Coordinator has distributed copies of its original Title VI Plan and assurances to Agency departments, (Agency Name) Council, (Agency Name) Civil Rights Commission, Department of Transportation Division Managers and the Office of the Prosecuting Attorney. Such distribution occurred on or before December 2000. The updated Plan dated September 2002 was disseminated in December 2002. The Plan as revised in 2004, along with the FFY 2004 Title VI Update Report will be circulated by December 1, 2004. The Title VI Specialist and Special Emphasis Area Liaisons (as defined in the plan) received copies of the original plan and will receive copies of the updates promptly for incorporation into operational manuals, guidelines, and procedures. 2. External Dissemination Goal — Public notification of (Agency Name)'s Title VI Plan will be on going. A. (Agency Name) will publicize (Agency Name)'s policy statement, as included in the Title VI Plan, in local minority and community -based newspapers. The (Agency Name)'s Title VI Plan will be made available to the public upon request. Additionally, the (Agency Name) Title VI Policy Statement and Complaint procedure may be found on the internet at B. The (Agency Name) will continue to distribute copies of the Title VI Plan to contractor organizations upon request. Additionally, the (Agency Name) will make copies of the plan available to all prime contractors, subcontractors, consultants and suppliers currently participating on (Agency Name) public works projects receiving federal financial aid upon request. The (Agency Name) will also make copies available to other firms providing goods and services to (Agency Name) upon their request. C. The (Agency Name) will include the appropriate Title VI nondiscrimination language and any implementing requirements FHWA may issue in all solicitations for competitive bidding or negotiated procurements with federal aid for construction, professional services and purchase of materials or equipment. 3. Training Goal —To ensure that (Agency Name) employees involved in the project management and the contracting practice are knowledgeable on potential Title VI issues (ongoing). A. Title VI Specialists and Liaisons are strongly encouraged to participate in training programs and workshops offered through Washington State Department of Transportation and others. Additionally, the Title VI Coordinator, in communicating with the Title VI Liaisons and Specialists, informs (Agency Name) employees of any new training opportunities upon notification from other external agencies. B. Additionally, Staff in conjunction with staff in the (Agency Name) Department of Transportation, Road Division, will continue to develop new training for (Agency Name) staff. DOT 140-561 Page 12 of 17 10/2015 Page 28-52 WSDOT Local Agency Guidelines M 36-63.29 October 2015 Chapter 28 Appendix 28.73 Annual Report for Agency With PopulatlAQfe►r'1g 'd&vJffr %. g/ C. The (Agency Name)'s Title VI Coordinator shall oversee training to include staff involved in (Agency Name)'s contracting processes. The Title VI Specialist will conduct the training. Training will occur throughout the year and will be specific to the Road Services and Contracting Divisions of (Agency Name) initially. This training will include information on: • The role of as the Title VI Coordinating agency. • Technical Assistance on Title VI matters. • Title VI reviews of program areas. • Procedures for the prompt processing of complaints of discrimination. • The necessity of updating the Title VI Plan to reflect organizational policy or implementation changes. The (Agency Name)'s Title VI Coordinator will request Department Directors and Managers to inform employees of new training opportunities upon notification from the Coordinator's office. Such opportunities may include courses offered by WSDOT, as well as from other outside agencies. D. The (Agency Name) will provide a training schedule to the Washington State Department of Transportation's Office of Equal Opportunity Title VI Coordinator. E. The (Agency Name)'s Title VI Coordinator shall maintain information gathered from training records for inclusion in annual report updates. 4. Information Collection for Annual Updates Goal — To establish and implement processes and procedures for collection of information required for inclusion in annual update report. A. The Title VI Specialist and Liaisons will assist the Title VI Coordinator in gathering and maintaining information on specific program areas and affected (Agency Name) departments. B. (Agency Name) will work with Liaisons and a designated Data Coordinator to collect and report on the information required by WSDOT for the Title VI Annual Update. C. Information for reports will be obtained from sources such as on -site compliance reviews (internal and external), checklists, review guides, questionnaires, public meeting sign in sheets, personnel inventory and employment utilization forms and inquires from the public. The Office of the Title VI Coordinator will compile this information for inclusion in the annual update reports as required. 5. Complaint Resolution Goal — To ensure that complaints are resolved in a professional and timely manner. The (Agency Name)'s Title VI Coordinator will investigate all complaints of Title VI violations as appropriate. The (Agency Name) will use procedures outlined in the Title VI Plan to investigate such complaints. The objective of the investigation will be to determine whether prohibited discrimination has occurred or could occur, and to take steps to remedy the situation. To accomplish this, the Title VI Coordinator shall coordinate the following: A. Identification of the basis for the complaint. B. Identification of sources of information. C. Fact finding interviews with aggrieved persons, witnesses and the alleged violator. DOT 140-561 Page 13 of 17 10/2015 r_ WSDOT Local Agency Guidelines M 36-63.29 October 2015 Page 28-53 Title VI Program Annual Report for Agency With Population Over 100,000 — Example AGENQpj. W 7• g) D. Development of a statement of finding -of -facts and information relevant to the issue/basis for the complaint. E. Informal dispute resolution. F. Report of findings in a manner that includes a conclusion and determination of future actions to take. G. Provision for possible appeal of the decision to the FHWA. The (Agency Name)'s Title VI Coordinator will consult with WSDOT before commencing investigations to determine which agency should properly investigate. 6. Annual Title VI Update Report Goal — To provide detailed information on activities performed in implementing (Agency Name)'s Title VI Plan and to document accomplishments. The Annual Title VI Update Report will include detailed information regarding the implementation activities related to (Agency Name)'s Title VI Plan and the (Agency Name)'s accomplishments. Specific areas that will be covered in the Annual Report include, but may not be limited to the following: A. Organization and Staff Profile B. Title VI Monitoring and Review Process C. Complaints and Investigations D. Special Emphasis Program Area Activities and Accomplishments E. Title VI Administration F. Training H. Accomplishments Report for Current Year DOT 140-561 Page 14 of 17 10/2015 Page 28-54 WSDOT Local Agency Guidelines M 36-63.29 October 2015 Chapter 28 Appendix 28.73 Annual Report for Agency With PopulatlAQfe►r'1g 'd&vJffr %. g/ Appendix E (Agency Name) Title VI Policy Statement (Agency Name) assures that no person shall on the grounds of race, color, national origin, or sex, as provided by Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 and as amended, and the Civil Rights Restoration Act of 1987 (P.I. 100.259) be excluded from participation in, be denied the benefits of, or be otherwise subjected to discrimination under any program or activity receiving Federal financial assistance from the Washington State Department of Transportation. (Agency Name) further assures every effort will be made to ensure nondiscrimination in all of its programs and activities, whether those programs or activities are federally funded or not. In the event (Agency Name) distributes federal aid funds to another governmental entity or other sub -recipient, (Agency Name) will include Title VI language in all written agreements and will monitor for compliance. (Agency Name)'s Office of the Title VI Coordinator is responsible for initiating and monitoring Title VI activities, preparing required reports and other (Agency Name) responsibilities as required by 23 CFR 200 and 49 CFR 21. (Agency Name) Executive Date DOT 140-561 Page 15 of 17 10/2015 r_ WSDOT Local Agency Guidelines M 36-63.29 October 2015 Page 28-55 Title VI Program Annual Report for Agency With Population Over 100,000 — Example AGENQpj. W 7• g) Appendix F Title VI Forms (Agency Name) provides Title VI forms to participants at public meetings (see Appendix A). In 2004 two forms were completed and turned in by participants. Title VI Public Involvement forms were made available at the (fill in appropriate information). Title VI Public Involvement forms were made available at the Sth Park Bridge EIS Community Advisory Group meetings on April 6, April 20, and May 4, 2004 at the Concord Elementary School Library, 723 S. Concord Street in Seattle, but no forms were submitted. Title VI Public Involvement forms were made available at the (Fill in the Name) on (Fill in the Date) at (Fill in location), but no forms were submitted. (OR: Two forms were submitted according to actual circumstance.) Title VI Public Involvement forms were made available at the (Fill in the Name) on (Fill in the Date) at (Fill in location), but no forms were submitted. (OR: Two forms were submitted according to actual circumstance.) Title VI Public Involvement forms were made available at the (Fill in the Name) on (Fill in the Date) at (Fill in location), but no forms were submitted. (OR: Two forms were submitted according to actual circumstance.) These forms are kept on file in the (Section of your Agency) and in the Office of the Title VI Coordinator. DOT 140-561 Page 16 of 17 10/2015 Page 28-56 WSDOT Local Agency Guidelines M 36-63.29 October 2015 Chapter 28 Appendix 28.73 Annual Report for Agency With PopulatlAQfe►r'1g 'd&vJffr %. g/ WSDOT Local Agency Guidelines M 36-63.29 Page 28-57 October 2015 AGENDA ITEM #7. g) NDA Annual Report Population Appendix 28.74 Under 100,000 - Example 1. Report any changes in the organizational structure since the last reporting period. Example: New Title VI Coordinator, new planning or public works directors, etc. • Report should identify the changes in the racial/gender composition of those persons involved in the transportation decision making, including planning and advisory staff. • If no changes have been made, please indicate that accordingly. 2. Using the most current data available (through Census or Washington State Office of Financial Management), describe the demographics within your jurisdiction. a. Describe any required Title VI activities and/or studies conducted that provided data relative to minority persons, neighborhoods, income levels, physical environment, and travel habits. b. How was the information utilized or Title VI provisions and needs applied in each study or activity? 3. List any Public outreach activities during the reporting period such as: Public announcements and/or communications for meetings, hearings, project notices. Include the following: a. How were special language needs assessed? List the special language needs assessments conducted. b. What outreach efforts did you utilize to ensure that minority, women, low- income, and LEP population groups were provided equal opportunity to participate in those outreach activities. (Examples: Provided materials in other languages, met with local social services agencies, advertised in a minority publications.) c. List the special language services provided. Note the professional language service provided including the name of the service, date provided, number of persons served, and any other relevant information. d. List any costs incurred for translations and interpreters for each activity. 4. List all the transportation related contracts (federal and others) that were executed during the reporting period. (Please include construction, consultant agreements for planning, design, engineering, environmental, research, maintenance, etc.) • Include dollar value of each. • Other than advertising in your local legal publication, what outreach was made to the DMWBE firms that a contracting opportunity existed within your agency? • Identify the DMWBE contracts that were awarded and their dollar amount. • Is there a Title VI Nondiscrimination statement included in all contracts and public notices? • How did your organization ensure that minority, women and disadvantaged firms were provided equal opportunity to participate in the contracting arena? Page 28-58 WSDOT Local Agency Guidelines M 36-63.29 October 2015 Chapter 28 Appendix 28.74 NDA Annual Report Populatidi�i l!►�kler•1U '6&vI ffV 7• g) 5. Summarize any transportation projects that identify potential impacts to minority and/or low-income Environmental Justice (EJ) populations, i.e., impacts such as displacements, increased noise, bisecting neighborhoods. Note the following: • How impacts were minimized/mitigated. • Also include a statement, if applicable, on projects that specifically benefit community cohesion such as: adding sidewalks, improving access to properties that improve access for EJ populations. 6. If ROW has been acquired for a transportation project, please describe: • Identify the number of minority, low-income, elderly and disabled persons affected. • The efforts that were made to address Limited English Proficiency issues (including use and cost of translators, outreach efforts for each reported activity). Describe any concerns raised by minorities and women regarding appraisals, negotiations, relocation assistance and payments. What actions were taken to resolve those issues? 7. List and describe any Title VI related complaints, as a result of transportation activities and projects. Include: What was the allegation or concern? • Procedures used. • Action taken. • Resolution. WSDOT Local Agency Guidelines M 36-63.29 Page 28-59 October 2015 AGENDA ITEM #7. g) Appendix 28.75 Title VI Complaint Log Page 28-60 WSDOT Local Agency Guidelines M 36-63.29 October 2015 AGENDA ITEM #7. g) Title VI Compliance Review Appendix 28.76 Questionnaire for Local Agencies Compliance Review Questionnaire for Local Agencies Local Agency: Click here to enter text. Date: Click here to enter text. Name/Title: Click here to enter text. 1. Administration a. Staff Composition and Program Administration i. Provide breakdown of your administrative staff by race, color, national origin, sex, and their positions. Click here to enter text. ii. How many federally funded projects have you managed during the last two years? Dollar amount? Click here to enter text. iii. Have you designated an EEO Officer or Title VI Coordinator? Provide name and time in the position. Click here to enter text. iv. Do you have a Title VI Policy, Assurances and Plan in place? Provide proof of public dissemination of your Title VI policy. Click here to enter text. b. Complaint Procedure i. Do you have a Title VI complaint procedure for external discrimination complaints? If so, please provide a copy. To what extent is the community aware of it? Click here to enter text. ii. Have you received any Title VI related complaints during the past two years? If so, how many? What were the outcomes? Where there any Title VI complaint lodged by beneficiaries or participants? If so, explain the issues involved. Click here to enter text. iii. Do you have a Title VI Notice to Public? If so, please provide copy. Click here to enter text. c. Training i. Has your staff received any training (formal or informal) regarding Title VI? Click here to enter text. ii. Are you considering scheduling Title VI training sometime soon? If so, when and who will present it? Click here to enter text. 2. Planning Activities a. Public Involvement i. Are minority members of the community invited to participate in public hearings? Click here to enter text. ii. How do you go about doing that? Click here to enter text. DOT 140-563 10/2015 Page 1 of 3 WSDOT Local Agency Guidelines M 36-63.29 Page 28-61 October 2015 Title VI Program Title VI Compliance Review Questionnaire for Local Agencies A GENQAJ . X T g) iii. Were accessible location, adequate time, and translation services considered or provided during the coordination of hearings? Click here to enter text. iv. Is the Hearing Coordinator keeping records in attendance? Is the information broken down by race, color, national origin, and sex (by visual identification)? Click here to enter text. v. Have planning manuals, directives, guidelines, and policies been reviewed for Title VI compliance purposes? Click here to enter text. 3. Consultant Contracts Activities a. Are Title VI assurances and provisions included on consultant contracts? Click here to enter text. b. Are DBE goals being included and met for consultant contracts? If not, what provisions have been taken to meet them? Click here to enter text. c. Have directives, operational procedures, guidelines, and policies been reviewed for Title VI compliance purposes? Click here to enter text. 4. Design/Environmental Activities a. Are minority members of the community invited to participate in public hearings? Click here to enter text. b. How do you go about doing that? Click here to enter text. c. Are accessibility of locations, adequate time, and translation services considered during the coordination of hearings? Was any other effort made to promote maximum attendance by those affected by the project, including member of minority communities? Click here to enter text. d. Is the Hearing Coordinator keeping records in attendance? Is the information broken down by race, color, national origin, sex, (by visual identification)? Click here to enter text. e. Have location and design manuals, directives, operational procedures, -guidelines, and policies been reviewed for Title VI compliance purposes? Click here to enter text. f. Is statistical data being collected on race, color, national origin, and sex on communities affected by a construction project? Click here to enter text. 5. Right of Way Activities DOT 140-563 10/2015 Page 2 of 3 Page 28-62 WSDOT Local Agency Guidelines M 36-63.29 October 2015 Chapter 28 �99#4 t/A V�A=n ff. g) Appendix 28.76 Title VI Compliance Review Ques o }� a �F a. Are DBE goals for real estate appraisers being met? If not, what provisions have been taken to help reach these goals? Click here to enter text. b. Is Title VI language being incorporated in all acquisition, negotiation, property management communications, and contracts? Click here to enter text. c. Are Title VI language and assurance statements being included in all surveys for property owners and tenants after the conclusion of all business? Click here to enter text. d. Are all values and communications associated with appraisals conducted in an equitable fashion? Click here to enter text. e. Do deeds, permits, and leases contain Title VI compliance clauses? Click here to enter text. f. Is statistical data being gathered on race, color, national origin, and sex for all relocates? Click here to enter text. g. Construction and Maintenance Activities a. Have contractor selection procedures been reviewed to determine uniformity in their application to minority and nonminority contractors? Click here to enter text. b. Are minority contractors and subcontractors being informed about contracting opportunities with your organization? Click here to enter text. c. Are construction rules and regulations being applied in an equitable fashion? Click here to enter text. d. Have you received any complaints within the last two years? Click here to enter text. e. Are Title VI assurances being included in all contracts, subcontracts, and material supply agreements? Click here to enter text. DOT 140-563 Page 3 of 3 10/2015 WSDOT Local Agency Guidelines M 36-63.29 Page 28-63 October 2015 Title VI Program Title VI Compliance Review Questionnaire for Local Agencies A GENQAJ . W 7• g) Page 28-64 WSDOT Local Agency Guidelines M 36-63.29 October 2015 AGENDA ITEM #7. g) Appendix 28.77 USDOT Standard Title VI Assurances 141W ra U.S. Department of DOT 1050.2A Transportation Office of the Secretary of Transportation SUBJECT: DOT STANDARD TITLE VI ASSURANCES AND NON-DISCRIMINATION PROVISIONS 1. PURPOSE. This order updates DOT 1050.2, Standard DOT Title VI Assurances. 2. SCOPE. This order applies to the Office of the Secretary and the operating administrations with regard to any program for which Federal financial assistance is authorized under a law administered by the U.S. Department of Transportation. 3. BACKGROUND. Section 21.7(a) of Title 49, Code of Federal Regulations, Department of Transportation, Subtitle A, Office of the Secretary, Part 21, Nondiscrimination in Federally -Assisted Programs of the Department of Transportation — Effectuation of Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, requires that all applications for Federal financial assistance from the Department of Transportation must contain Title VI Assurances. This order requires the Office of the Secretary and each operating administration to secure from applicants and recipients receiving Federal financial assistance the attached Standard DOT Title VI Assurances. The reverter clause in Appendices B and C of the assurances should be used only when it is determined that such a clause is necessary in order to make clear the purposes of Title VI. The assurances may be supplemented by additional paragraphs by the Office of the Secretary and operating administrations desiring to expand the assurances in order to make them more applicable to a particular program. All such changes or expansions shall be coordinated with the Departmental Office of Civil Rights, 4. RESPONSIBILITIES. a. The Departmental Director of Civil Rights will monitor compliance with this order, including review of any expansion or addenda to the Standard DOT Title VI Assurances and Non -Discrimination Provisions by the Assistant Secretary for Administration or an op ing administration. b. The Assistant Secretary for Administration, with respect t pr grams for which Feder ancial assistance is requested from the Office of the Secretary, sh as re that all application n ude the attached Standard DOT Title VI Assurances and Non is •imi tion Provisions. c. The Head of Each Operating Administration, wi r spec o pro rams for whic Fed •al financial assistance is requested from the operating administ t' ns, s 11 as that all ap teatio include the attached Standard DOT Order 1050.2, Standard T' I As uran and Non- rimi n Provisions. ® s WSDOT Local Agency Guidelines M 36-63.29 Page 28-65 October 2015 Title VI Program Title VI Compliance Review Questionnaire for Local Agencies AGENL AXMi #7• g) The United States Department of Transportation (USDOT) Standard Title VI/Non-Discrimination Assurances DOT Order No.1050.2A The (Title of Recipient) (herein referred to as the "Recipient"), HEREBY AGREES THAT, as a condition to receiving any Federal financial assistance from the U.S. Department of Transportation (DOT), through (Title o Modal Operating Administration), is subject to and will comply with the following: Statutory/Regulatory Authorities • Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 (42 U.S.C. § 2000d et seq., 78 stat. 252), (prohibits discrimination on the basis of race, color, national origin); • 49 C.F,R. Part 21 (entitled Non-discrimination In Federally -Assisted Programs Of The Department Of Transportation —Effectuation Of Title VI Of The Civil Rights Act Of 1964); • 28 C.F.R. section 50.3 (U.S. Department of Justice Guidelines for Enforcement of Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964); Modal Operating Administration may include additional Statutory/Regulatory Authorities here. The preceding statutory and regulatory cites hereinafter are referred to as the "Acts" and "Regulations, respectively. General Assurances In accordance with the Acts, the Regulations, and other pertinent directives, circulars, policy, memoranda, and/or guidance, the Recipient hereby gives assurance that it will promptly take any measures necessary to ensure that: "No person in the United States shall, on the grounds of race, color, or national origin, be excluded from participation in, be denied the benefits of, or be otherwise subjected to discrimination under any program or activity, "for which the Recipient receives Federal financial assistance from DOT, including the (Title of Modal Operating Administration). The Civil Rights Restoration Act of 1987 clarified the original intent of Congress, with respect to Title VI and other Non-discrimination requirements (The Age Discrimination Act of 1975, and Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973), by restoring the broad, institutional -wide scope and coverage of these non- discrimination statutes and requirements to include all programs and activities of the Recipient, so long as any portion of the program is Federally assisted. Modal Operating Administration may include additional General Assurances in this section, or reference an addendum here. Specific Assurances More specifically, and without limiting the above general Assurance, the Recipient agrees with and gives the following Assurances with respect to its Federally assisted (Name ofAppropriate Program): 1. The Recipient agrees that each "activity," "facility," or "program," as defined in § § 21.23 (b) and 21.23 (e) of 49 C.F.R. § 21 will be (with regard to an "activity") facilitated, or will be (with regard to a Page 28-66 WSDOT Local Agency Guidelines M 36-63.29 October 2015 Chapter 28 /AV Appendix 28.77 Title VI Compliance Review Ques�o 99#4 A=�ff. g) "facility") operated, or will be (with regard to a "program") conducted in compliance with all requirements imposed by, or pursuant to the Acts and the Regulations. 2. The Recipient will insert the following notification in all solicitations forbids, Requests For Proposals for work, or material subject to the Acts and the Regulations made in connection with all Name o Appropriate Program) and, in adapted form, in all proposals for negotiated agreements regardless of funding source: "The (Title of Recipient), in accordance with the provisions of Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 (78 Stat. 252, 42 U.S.C. §§ 2000d to 2000d-4) and the Regulations, hereby notifies all bidders that it will affirmatively ensure that any contract entered into pursuant to this advertisement, disadvantaged business enterprises will be afforded full and fair opportunity to submit bids in response to this invitation and will not be discriminated against on the grounds of race, color, or national origin in consideration for an award." 3. The Recipient will insert the clauses of Appendix A and E of this Assurance in every contract or agreement subject to the Acts and the Regulations. 4. The Recipient will insert the clauses of Appendix B of this Assurance, as a covenant running with the land, in, any deed from the United States effecting or recording a transfer of real property, structures, use, or improvements thereon or interest therein to a Recipient. 5. That where the Recipient receives Federal financial assistance to construct a facility, or part of a facility, the Assurance will extend to the entire facility and facilities operated in connection therewith. 6. That where the Recipient receives Federal financial assistance in the form, or for the acquisition of real property or an interest in real property, the Assurance will extend to rights to space on, over, or under such property. 7. That the Recipient will include the clauses set forth in Appendix C and Appendix D of this Assurance, as a covenant running with the land, in any future deeds, leases, licenses, permits, or similar instruments entered into by the Recipient with other parties: for the subsequent transfer of real property acquired or improved under the applicable activity, project, or program; and for the construction or use of, or access to, space on, over, or under real property acquired or improved under the applicable activity, project, or program. 8. That this Assurance obligates the Recipient for the period during which Federal financial assistance is extended to the program, except where the Federal financial assistance is to provide, or is in the form of, personal property, or real property, or interest therein, or structures or improvements thereon, in which case the Assurance obligates the Recipient, or any transferee for the longer of the following periods: a. the period during which the property is used for a purpose for which the Federal financial assistance is extended, or for another purpose involving the provision of similar services or benefits; or b. the period during which the Recipient retains ownership or possession of the property, 9. The Recipient will provide for such methods of administration for the program as are found by the Secretary of Transportation or the official to whom he/she delegates specific authority to give reasonable guarantee that it, other recipients, sub -recipients, sub -grantees, contractors, subcontractors, consultants, transferees, successors in interest, and other participants of Federal financial assistance WSDOT Local Agency Guidelines M 36-63.29 October 2015 Page 28-67 Title VI Program Title VI Compliance Review Questionnaire for Local Agencies AGENPA. �7• g) 1 1 under such program will comply with all requirements imposed or pursuant to the Acts, the Regulations, and this Assurance. 10. The Recipient agrees that the United States has a right to seek judicial enforcement with regard to any matter arising under the Acts, the Regulations, and this Assurance. Modal Operating Administration may include additional Speeiflc Assurances in this section. By signing this ASSURANCE, [Name of the recipient] also agrees to comply (and require any sub -recipients, sub -grantees, contractors, successors, transferees, and/or assignees to comply) with all applicable provisions governing the [insert Agency name] access to records, accounts, documents, information, facilities, and staff. You also recognize that you must comply with any program or compliance reviews, and/or complaint investigations conducted by the [insert Agency name]. You must keep records, reports, and submit the material for review upon request to [insert Agency here], or its designee in a timely, complete, and accurate way. Additionally, you must comply with all other reporting, data collection, and evaluation requirements, as prescribed by law or detailed in program guidance. [Name of Recipient] gives this ASSURANCE in consideration of and for obtaining any Federal grants, loans, contracts, agreements, property, and/or discounts, or other Federal -aid and Federal financial assistance extended after the date hereof to the recipients by the U.S. Department of Transportation under the Mme ofAppropriate Pro ram . This ASSURANCE is binding on [insert State], other recipients, sub -recipients, sub -grantees, contractors, subcontractors and their subcontractors', transferees, successors in interest, and any other participants in the (Name ofAppropriate Program). The person(s) signing below is authorized to sign this ASSURANCE on behalf of the Recipient. by (Name of Recipient) (Signature ofAuthorized Official) DATED 4 M Page 28-68 WSDOT Local Agency Guidelines M 36-63.29 October 2015 Chapter 28 /AV Appendix 28.77 Title VI Compliance Review Ques�o 99#4 A=�ff. g) APPENDIX A J During the performance of this contract, the contractor, for itself, its assignees, and successors in interest (hereinafter J referred to as the "contractor") agrees as follows: 1. Compliance with Regulations: The contractor (hereinafter includes consultants) will comply with the Acts and the Regulations relative to Non-discrimination in Federally -assisted programs of the U.S. Department of Transportation, (Title of Modal Operating Administration), as they may be amended { from time to time, which are herein incorporated by reference and made apart of this contract. 2. Non-discrimination: The contractor, with regard to the work performed by it during the contract, will not discriminate on the grounds of race, color, or national origin in the selection and retention of subcontractors, including procurements of materials and leases of equipment. The contractor will not participate directly or indirectly in the discrimination prohibited by the Acts and the Regulations, including employment practices when the contract covers any activity, project, or program set forth in Appendix B of 49 CFR Part 21. [Include Modal Operating Administration specific program requirements.] 3. Solicitations for Subcontracts, Including Procurements of Materials and Equipment. In all solicitations, either by competitive bidding, or negotiation made by the contractor for work to be performed under a subcontract, including procurements of materials, or leases of equipment, each potential subcontractor or supplier will be notified by the contractor of the contractor's obligations under i this contract and the Acts and the Regulations relative to Non-discrimination on the.grounds of race, color, or national origin. [Include Modal Operating Administration speefe program requirements.] 4. Information and Reports: The contractor will provide all information and reports required by the Acts, the Regulations, and directives issued pursuant thereto and will permit access to its books, records, accounts,other sources of information, and its facilities as may be determined by the Recipient or the (Title of Modal Ooerating Administration) to be pertinent to ascertain compliance with such Acts, Regulations, and instructions. Where any information required of a contractor is in the exclusive possession of another who fails or refuses to furnish the information, the contractor will so certify to the Recipient or the (Title of Modal Operating Administration), as appropriate, and will set forth what efforts it has made to obtain the information. 5. Sanctions for Noncompliance: In the event of a contractor's noncompliance with the Non- discrimination provisions of this contract, the Recipient will impose such contract sanctions as it or the (Title ofModal Operatin,eAdministration) may determine to be appropriate, including, but not limited to: a. withholding payments to the contractor under the contract until the contractor complies; and/or b. cancelling, terminating, or suspending a contract, in whole or in part. Incorporation of Provisions: The contractor will include the provisions of paragraphs one through six in every subcontract, including procurements of materials and leases of equipment, unless exempt by the Acts, the Regulations and directives issued pursuant thereto. The contractor will take action with respect to any subcontract or procurement as the Recipient or the (Title ofModal Operating Administration) may direct as a means of enforcing such provisions including sanctions for noncompliance. Provided, that if the contractor becomes involved in, or is threatened with litigation by a subcontractor, or supplier because of such direction, the contractor may request the Recipient to enter into any litigation to protect the interests of the Recipient. In addition, the contractor may request the United States to enter into the litigation to protect the interests of the United States. WSDOT Local Agency Guidelines M 36-63.29 October 2015 Page 28-69 Title VI Program Title VI Compliance Review Questionnaire for Local Agencies AGENPA. �7• g) APPENDIX B CLAUSES FOR DEEDS TRANSFERRING UNITED STATES PROPERTY The following clauses will be included in deeds effecting or recording the transfer of real property, structures, or improvements thereon, or granting interest therein from the United States pursuant to the provisions of Assurance 4: NOW, THEREFORE, the U.S. Department of Transportation as authorized by law and upon the condition that the (Title of Recipient) will accept title to the lands and maintain the project constructed thereon in accordance with (Name ofAvoropriate Le,�islativeAuthority), the Regulations for the Administration of Mamme o Appropriate Prozra—m , and the policies and procedures prescribed by the (77tde of Modal Operatinz Administration) of the U.S. Department of Transportation in accordance and in compliance with all requirements imposed by Title 49, Code of Federal Regulations, U.S. Department of Transportation, Subtitle A, Office of the Secretary, Part 21, Non-discrimination in Federally -assisted programs of the U.S Department of Transportation pertaining to and effectuating the provisions of Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 (78 Stat. 252; 42 U.S.C. § 2000d to 2000d-4), does hereby remise, release, quitclaim and convey unto the (Title of Recipient) all the right, title and interest of the U.S. Department of Transportation in and to said lands described in Exhibit A attached hereto and made a part hereof. (HABENDUM CLAUSE) TO HAVE AND TO HOLD said lands and interests therein unto (Title of Recipient) and its successors forever, subject; however, to the covenants, conditions, restrictions and reservations herein contained as follows, which will remain in effect for the period during which the real property or structures are used for a purpose for which Federal financial assistance is extended or for another purpose involving the provision of similar services or benefits and will be binding on the (Title ofReciplent), its successors and assigns. The (Title ofReclpdent), in consideration of the conveyance of said lands and interests in lands, does hereby covenant and agree as a covenant running with the land for itself, its successors and assigns, that (1) no person will on the grounds of race, color, or national origin, be excluded from participation in, be denied the benefits of, or be otherwise subjected to discrimination with regard to any facility located wholly or in part on, over, or under such lands hereby conveyed [,] [and]* (2) that the (77tde ofRecipdent) will use the lands and interests in lands and interests in lands so conveyed, in compliance with all requirements imposed by or pursuant to Title 49, Code of Federal Regulations, U.S. Department of Transportation, Subtitle A, Office of the Secretary, Part 21, Non- discrimination in Federally -assisted programs of the U.S. Department of Transportation, Effectuation of Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, and as said Regulations and Acts may be amended[, and (3) that in the event of breach of any of the above -mentioned non-discrimination conditions, the Department will have a right to enter or re-enter said lands and facilities on said land, and that above described land and facilities will thereon revert to and vest in and become the absolute property of the U.S. Department of Transportation and its assigns as such. interest existed prior to this instruction].* (*Reverter clause and related language to be used only when it is determined that such a clause is necessary in order to make clear the purpose of Title VI.) FM Page 28-70 WSDOT Local Agency Guidelines M 36-63.29 October 2015 Chapter 28 /AV Appendix 28.77 Title VI Compliance Review Ques�o 99#4 A=�ff. g) APPENDIX C CLAUSES FOR TRANSFER OF REAL PROPERTY ACQUIRED OR IMPROVED UNDER THE ACTIVITY, FACILITY, OR PROGRAM The following clauses will be included in deeds, licenses, leases, permits, or similar instruments entered into by the (Title of Recipient) pursuant to the provisions of Assurance 7(a): A. The (grantee, lessee, permittee, etc. as appropriate) for himself/herself, his/her heirs, personal representatives, successors in interest, and assigns, as a part of the consideration hereof, does hereby covenant and agree [in the case of deeds and leases add "as a covenant running with the land"] that: 1. In the event facilities are constructed, maintained, or otherwise operated on the property described in this (deed, license, lease, permit, etc.) for a purpose for which a U.S. Department of Transportation activity, facility, or program is extended or for another purpose involving the provision of similar services or benefits, the (grantee, licensee, lessee, permittee, etc.) will maintain and operate such facilities and services in compliance with all requirements imposed by the Acts and Regulations (as may be amended) such that no person on the grounds of race, color, or national origin, will be excluded from participation in, denied the benefits of, or be otherwise subjected to discrimination in the use of said facilities. B. With respect to licenses, leases, permits, etc., in the event of breach of any of the above Non-discrimination covenants, (Title of Recipient) will have the right to terminate the (lease, license, permit, etc.) and to enter, re-enter, and repossess said lands and facilities thereon, and hold the same as if the (lease, license, permit, etc.) had never been made or issued.* C. With respect to a deed, in the event of breach of any of the above Non-discrimination covenants, the (Title o Reci lent) will have the right to enter or re-enter the lands and facilities thereon, and the above described lands and facilities will there upon revert to and vest in and become the absolute property of the 77de o Recipient) and its assigns.* (*Reverter clause and related language to be used only when it is determined that such a clause is necessary to make clear the purpose of Title VI.) WSDOT Local Agency Guidelines M 36-63.29 Page 28-71 October 2015 Title VI Program Title VI Compliance Review Questionnaire for Local Agencies AGENPA. �7• g) APPENDIX D CLAUSES FOR CONSTRUCTION/USE/ACCESS TO REAL PROPERTY ACQUIRED UNDER THE ACTIVITY, FACILITY OR PROGRAM The following clauses will be included in deeds, licenses, permits, or similar instruments/agreements entered into by (Title efReclpient) pursuant to the provisions of Assurance 7(b): A. The (grantee, licensee, permittee, etc., as appropriate) for himself/herself, his/her heirs, personal representatives, successors in interest, and assigns, as a part of the consideration hereof, does hereby covenant and agree (in the case of deeds and leases add, "as a covenant running with the land") that (1) no person on the ground of race, color, or national origin, will be excluded from participation in, denied the benefits of, or be otherwise subjected to discrimination in the use of said facilities, (2) that in the construction of any improvements on, over, or under such land, and the furnishing of services thereon, no person on the ground of race, color, or national origin, will be excluded from participation in, denied the benefits of, or otherwise be subjected to discrimination, (3) that the (grantee, licensee, lessee, permittee, etc.) will use the premises in compliance with all other requirements imposed by or pursuant to the Acts and Regulations, as amended, set forth in this Assurance. B. With respect to (licenses, leases, permits, etc.), in the event of breach of any of the above Non- discrimination covenants, (Title of Recipient) will have the right to terminate the (license, permit, etc., as appropriate) and to enter or re-enter and repossess said land and the facilities thereon, and hold the same as if said (license, permit, etc., as appropriate) had never been made or issued.* C. With respect to deeds, in the event of breach of any of the above Non-discrimination covenants, (Title o Recipient) will there upon revert to and vest in and become the absolute property of (Title afRecipienb and its assigns.* (*Reverter clause and related language to be used only when it is determined that such a clause is necessary to make clear the purpose of Title Vl.) E Page 28-72 WSDOT Local Agency Guidelines M 36-63.29 October 2015 Chapter 28 /AV Appendix 28.77 Title VI Compliance Review Ques�o 99#4 A=�ff. g) APPENDIX E During the performance of this contract, the contractor, for itself, its assignees, and successors in interest (hereinafter referred to as the "contractor") agrees to comply with the following non-discrimination statutes and authorities; including but not limited to; Pertinent Non -Discrimination Authorities: • Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 (42 U.S.C. § 2000d et seq., 78 stat. 252), (prohibits discrimination on the basis of race, color, national origin); and 49 CFR Part 21. • The Uniform Relocation Assistance and Real Property Acquisition Policies Act of 1970, (42 U.S.C. § 4601), (prohibits unfair treatment of persons displaced or whose property has been acquired because of Federal or Federal -aid programs and projects); • Federal -Aid Highway Act of 1973, (23 U.S.C. § 324 et seq.), (prohibits discrimination on the basis of sex); • Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, (29 U.S.C. § 794 et seq.), as amended, (prohibits discrimination on the basis of disability); and 49 CFR Part 27; • The Age Discrimination Act of 1975, as amended, (42 U.S.C. § 6101 et seq.), (prohibits discrimination on the basis of age); • Airport and Airway Improvement Act of 1982, (49 USC § 471, Section 47123), as amended, (prohibits discrimination based on race, creed, color, national origin, or sex); • The Civil Rights Restoration Act of 1987, (PL 100-209), (Broadened the scope, coverage and applicability of Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, The Age Discrimination Act of 1975 and Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, by expanding the definition of the terms "programs or activities" to include all of the programs or activities of the Federal -aid recipients, sub -recipients and contractors, whether such programs or activities are Federally funded or not); • Titles II and III of the Americans with Disabilities Act, which prohibit discrimination on the basis of disability in the operation of public entities, public and private transportation systems, places of public accommodation, and certain testing entities (42 U.S.C. §§ 12131 — 12189) as implemented by Department of Transportation regulations at 49 C.F.R. parts 37 and 3 8; • The Federal Aviation Administration's Non-discrimination statute (49 U.S.C. § 47123) (prohibits discrimination on the basis of race, color, national origin, and sex); • Executive Order 12898, Federal Actions to Address Environmental Justice in Minority Populations and Low -Income Populations, which ensures discrimination against minority populations by discouraging programs, policies, and activities with disproportionately high and adverse human health or environmental effects on minority and low-income populations; • Executive Order 13166, Improving Access to Services for Persons with Limited English Proficiency, and resulting agency guidance, national origin discrimination includes discrimination because of limited English proficiency (LEP). To ensure compliance with Title VI, you —must take reasonable steps to -ensure that LEP persons have meaningful access to your programs (70 Fed. Reg. at 74087 to 74100); • Title IX of the Education Amendments of 1972, as amended, which prohibits you from discriminating because of sex in education programs or activities (20 U.S.C. 1681 et seq). WSDOT Local Agency Guidelines M 36-63.29 October 2015 Page 28-73 Title VI Program Title VI Compliance Review Questionnaire for Local Agencies AGENPA. �7• g) Page 28-74 WSDOT Local Agency Guidelines M 36-63.29 October 2015 AGENDA ITEM #7. g) CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON, ADOPTING THE CITY OF RENTON TITLE VI PLAN. WHEREAS, the federal government enacted Title VI of the 1964 Civil Rights Act which provided that no person in the United States shall on the grounds of race, color, national origin, or sex be excluded from participation in, be denied the benefits of, or be otherwise subjected to discrimination under any program or activity receiving Federal financial assistance; and WHEREAS, the Civil Rights Restoration Act of 1987 broadened the scope of Title VI coverage by expanding the definition of terms "programs or activities" to include all programs or activities of Federal Aid recipients, sub -recipients, and contractors, whether such programs and activities are federally assisted or not; and WHEREAS, Limited English Proficiency — Executive Order 13166 clarified that individuals with Limited English Proficiency are protected under the Title VI nondiscrimination provisions related to national origin, and requires Federal Aid recipients, sub -recipients and contractors to take reasonable steps to provide meaningful access to programs, services and entities. These reasonable steps may include providing information, services and materials in languages other than English; and WHEREAS, Environmental Justice — Executive Order 12898 clarified that Title VI requires Federal aid recipients, sub -recipients and contractors to conduct an equity assessment to ensure full and fair participation of minority and low-income communities and avoid disproportionately high or adverse human and environmental impacts from transportation projects; and 1 AGENDA ITEM #7. g) RESOLUTION NO. WHEREAS, the City created its Title VI Plan in coordination with the Washington State Department of Transportation in its capacity of administrating the distribution of Federal Highway Administration funds. The City's Title VI Plan is intended to apply primarily to programs funded by such funds; NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON, DO RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS: SECTION I. The City Council adopts by reference the City of Renton Title VI Plan, City of Renton Federally Funded Transportation Program, attached as Exhibit A and incorporated herein. PASSED BY THE CITY COUNCIL this day of 12019. Jason A. Seth, City Clerk APPROVED BY THE MAYOR this day of 12019. Approved as to form: Shane Moloney, City Attorney RES.1800:1/11/19:scr Denis Law, Mayor 2 AGENDA ITEM #7. g) City of Renton TITLE VI PLAN City of Renton Federally Funded Transportation Program City of Renton Title VI Plan AGENDA ITEM #7. g) Table of Contents I. Policy Statement, Authorities and Citations.................................................................... 3 II. Organization, Staffing and Structure............................................................................ 4 III. Title VI Plan Implementation and Program Administration ........................................ 5 IV. NHI Education and Title VI Training........................................................................... 7 V. Complaint Procedures — Allegations of Discrimination in Federally Assisted Programsor Activities............................................................................................................ 8 VI. Sub -Recipient Review and Remedial Action Procedures .......................................... 10 A. Title VI Review of Sub -recipients of Federal -Aid Highway Funds ........................... 10 B. Post -Grant Reviews.................................................................................................... 11 C. Remedial Action......................................................................................................... 11 VII. Title VI Implementation Activities in Special Emphasis Program Areas .................. 11 A. Planning & Location Activities.................................................................................. 11 B. Consultant Contracts Activities.................................................................................. 12 C. Design & Engineering / Environmental Activities..................................................... 13 D. Right-of-way Activities.............................................................................................. 14 E. Construction Activities.............................................................................................. 15 City of Renton Title VI Plan AGENDA ITEM #7. g) I. Policy Statement, Authorities and Citations A. Policy of Nondiscrimination The City of Renton assures that no person shall on the grounds of race, color, national origin, or sex as provided by Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, and the Civil Rights Restoration Act of 1987 (P.L. 100.259) be excluded from participation in, be denied the benefits of, or be otherwise subjected to discrimination under any City sponsored program or activity. The City of Renton further assures every effort will be made to ensure nondiscrimination in all of its programs and activities, whether those programs and activities are federally funded or not. In the event the City of Renton distributes Federal aid funds to another entity, the City will include Title VI language in all written agreements and will monitor for compliance. Title VI compliance is a condition of receipt for Federal funds. Assurance of compliance, therefore, falls under the proper authority of the Mayor pursuant to its budgetary authority and responsibility. The Mayor, Public Works Administrator and Title VI Coordinator are authorized to ensure compliance with provisions of this policy and with the law, including the requirements of 23 Code of Federal Regulation (CFR) 200 and 49 CFR 21. Mayor Public Works Administrator Date Date Transportation Director & Transportation Title VI Coordinator Date B. Authorities Title VI of the 1964 Civil Rights Act provides that no person in the United States shall on the grounds of race, color, national origin, or sex be excluded from participation in, be denied the benefits of, or be otherwise subjected to discrimination under any program or activity receiving Federal financial assistance. The Civil Rights Restoration Act of 1987 broadened the scope of Title VI coverage by expanding the definition of terms "programs or activities" to include all programs or activities of Federal Aid recipients, sub -recipients, and contractors, whether such programs and activities are Federally assisted or not (Public Law 100-259 [S. 557] March 22, 1988). City of Renton Title VI Plan 3 AGENDA ITEM #7. g) Limited English Proficiency — Executive Order 13166 clarifies that individuals with Limited English Proficiency (LEP) are protected under the title VI nondiscrimination provisions related to national origin, and requires Federal Aid recipients, sub -recipients and contractors to take reasonable steps to provide meaningful access to programs, services and entities. These reasonable steps may include providing information, services and materials in languages other than English. Environmental Justice — Executive Order 12898 clarifies that Title VI requires Federal aid recipients, sub -recipients and contractors to conduct an equity assessment to ensure full and fair participation of minority and low-income communities and avoid disproportionately high or adverse human and environmental impacts from transportation projects. This Plan is created in coordination with the Washington State Transportation in its capacity of administrating the distribution of Federal Highway Administration dollars. The Policy is intended to apply primarily to programs funded by such dollars. Other departments, sections, and divisions of the City of Renton that receive non -highway federal funding may be bound to and/or follow different policies and procedures in order to comply with the above authorities and applicable requirements of the agencies responsible for distributing such federal funding. C. Additional Citations Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964; 42 USC 2000d to 2000d-4; 42 USC 4601 to 4655; 23 USC 109(h); 23 USC 324; DOT Order 1050.2; EO 12250; EO 12898; 28 CFR 50.3 ii. Organization, Staffing and Structure A. Organizational Chart (See Appendix 4) B. Staffing and Structure City Administrator The Mayor is authorized to ensure compliance with provisions of the City's policy of non- discrimination and with the law, including the requirements of 23 CFR Part 200 and 49 CFR Part 21. The City's grants compliance function and Title VI coordination shall be performed under the authority of the Mayor. Title VI Coordinator The City of Renton has designated the position of Transportation Director to perform the duties of the Transportation Title VI Coordinator and ensure implementation of the City's Title VI Federally Funded Transportation Program. The Transportation Director has other duties and responsibilities in addition to Title VI. Although the Transportation Director is directly supervised by the Public Works Administrator, this position shall have an indirect reporting relationship and access to the Mayor. City of Renton Title VI Plan 4 AGENDA ITEM #7. g) Title VI Specialists Additionally, the Transportation Division has designated Title VI Specialists (Specialists) in Transportation Division's emphasis areas. The Specialists, designated below, shall work in concert with the Title VI Coordinator. These areas are subject to receiving Federal assistance through grants or other types of transportation related funding. The Specialists will work with the Coordinator to ensure their respective sections comply with Title VI regulations and assurances, meet the objectives of the Title VI Plan, meet Federal and state reporting requirements, and provide adequate training opportunities for applicable staff. Title VI Specialists will work with the Coordinator to ascertain Title VI compliance by contractors, subcontractors, consultants, suppliers and other sub -recipients under Transportation's Federally funded projects or programs. Specialists will ensure applicable Title VI provisions and requirements are included in contractual agreements to prime contractors and sub -recipients. Specialists will work with the Coordinator to obtain statistical data on race, color, national origin, handicap/disability, and sex of participants in, and beneficiaries of Federally funded City of Renton transportation programs. Each of the Specialists will maintain data relative to their respective special emphasis area, designated below. The Coordinator shall use the data to complete annual Title VI reports and for other administrative needs. Title VI Specialists - Emphasis Area and Job Title Transportation Design Design Manager Transportation Operations Operations Manager Transportation Planning Planning Manager Transportation Maintenance Maintenance Manager Transportation Administration Program Development Coordinator American with Disabilities Liaison Transportation Planner III. Title VI Plan Implementation and Program Administration Title VI Coordinator's Responsibilities and Program Administration As authorized by the Mayor, the Title VI Coordinator is responsible for initiating, monitoring, and ensuring the City of Renton's Transportation Division compliance with Title VI requirements as follows: A. Program Administration. Administer the Title VI program and coordinate implementation of the plan. Ensure compliance with the assurances, policy, and program objectives. Perform Title VI program reviews to assess administrative procedures, staffing, and resources; provide recommendations as required to the Public Works Administrator. B. Complaints. City of Renton Title VI Plan S AGENDA ITEM #7. g) Review written Title VI complaints that may be received by the Transportation Division following the adopted procedural guidelines (see Section V — Complaint Procedures). Ensure every effort is made to resolve complaints informally at the local or regional level. C. Data Collection. Review the statistical data gathering process performed by Title VI Specialists periodically to ensure sufficiency of data for meeting the requirements of Title VI program administration. (See Section VII - Special Emphasis Program Areas). D. Environmental Impact Statements. Ensure that available census data are included as a part of all Environmental Impact Statements/Assessments (EIS/EIA) conducted by the Transportation Division for projects receiving Federal Highway Administration or other Federal assistance. E. Training Programs. Conduct or facilitate training programs on Title VI issues and regulations for Transportation Division employees; and facilitate Title VI training for appropriate staff, contractors and sub - recipients. F. Title VI Plan Update. Review and update the City of Renton's Transportation Title VI Plan as needed or required. Present updated plan to the Public Works Administrator; submit amended Plan to WSDOT. G. Annual Accomplishment Report. Prepare an annual report of Title VI accomplishments and changes to the program in the preceding Federal fiscal year; identify goals and objectives for the upcoming year as required; and submit to WSDOT in a timely manner. H. Public Dissemination. Work to develop and disseminate Title VI program information to the Transportation Division staff and other City of Renton employees and sub -recipients, including contractors, subcontractors, consultants, and sub -consultants and beneficiaries, as well as the general public. Public dissemination may include Title VI language in contracts or other agreements, website postings, and annual publication of the City's Title VI Policy Statement in newspaper(s) having a general circulation. Ensure public service announcements or notices of proposed projects, hearings, meetings, or formation of public advisory boards, are posted in newspapers or other media reaching the affected community. Ensure the full utilization of available minority publications or media; and, where appropriate, provide written or verbal information in languages other than English. I. Elimination of Discrimination. Work with the City Attorney Department, Human Resources Department, and other City offices to establish procedures for promptly resolving deficiencies, as needed. Recommend procedures to identify and eliminate discrimination that may be discovered in any Transportation Division processes. City of Renton Title VI Plan 0 AGENDA ITEM #7. g) J. Maintain Legislative and Procedural Information. Federal laws, rules and regulations, WSDOT guidelines, the current City of Renton Title VI Plan, Annual Accomplishment Reports, and other resource information pertaining to the implementation and administration of the City's Title VI program will be maintained and updated by the Coordinator. Information will be made available to other City departments or the public as requested or required. IV. NHI Education and Title VI Training In keeping with adopted City of Renton policy of nondiscrimination, procedures will be established or followed for Transportation employees to have equal access to applicable educational and training opportunities. Transportation staff will maintain program administration documentation and data necessary for preparation of annual Title VI reports, and will routinely supply the necessary data to the Title VI Coordinator. A. National Highway Institute (NHI) Education The Coordinator will be notified when training for the National Highway Institute courses or workshops become available to City of Renton Transportation employees. The Transportation Director will establish a policy for the selection of participants interested in taking part in the National Highway Institute Training workshops to ensure that no one is denied participation or subjected to discrimination on the basis of race, color, national origin or sex. A report will be completed and forwarded to the Coordinator upon completion of each educational seminar or course throughout the course of the year, which shall include the name of each participant, their title, division, sex and ethnicity for use in completing the annual Title VI accomplishment report. B. Title VI Training The Transportation Title VI Coordinator is responsible for overall Title VI related training and staff development for Title VI Specialists and other City of Renton employees. The Coordinator will organize and facilitate the provision of Title VI training sessions for consultants, contractors, and subcontractors periodically. WSDOT's Office of Equal Opportunity Internal and External Civil Rights Branch and the Contract Compliance Office may be asked to provide applicable training. C. Selection of Instructors The Coordinator will collaborate with the City of Renton's Contracting Services to ensure City policy is followed in the selection of instructors for City of Renton Transportation training courses/ workshops, and ensure equal opportunity in the selection process for all training contracts. Per adopted policy, the City will provide accessibility to Minority/Women/Disadvantage Business Enterprise consulting and training firms to compete for training contracts. City of Renton Title VI Plan 7 AGENDA ITEM #7. g) V. Complaint Procedures — Allegations of Discrimination in Federally Assisted Programs or Activities A. Overview These procedures cover all complaints filed under Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 as amended, Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, Civil Rights Restoration Act of 1987, and the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990, relating to any program or activity administered by the City of Renton Transportation Division, as well as to sub -recipients, consultants, and contractors. These procedures apply to complaints filed against a program and/or activity funded by the Federal Highway Administration (FHWA). Intimidation or retaliation of any kind is prohibited by law. The procedures do not deny the right of the complainant to file formal complaints with other state or Federal agencies or to seek private counsel for complaints alleging discrimination. These procedures are part of an administrative process, which do not provide for remedies that include punitive damages or compensatory remuneration for the complainant. Every effort will be made to resolve complaints informally at the City and sub -recipient level. The option of informal mediation meeting(s) between the affected parties and a designated mediator may be utilized for resolution. B. Procedures Any individual, group of individuals, or entity that believes they have been subjected to discrimination prohibited by Title VI nondiscrimination provisions may file a written complaint with the Human Resources Department at the City of Renton. A formal complaint must be filed within 180 calendar days of the alleged occurrence. Complaint forms are available through the City's website or by contacting the Title VI Coordinator. The City will not officially act or respond to complaints made verbally. Allegations received by telephone will be reduced to writing and provided to the complainant for confirmation or revision before processing. A complaint form will be forwarded to the complainant for him/her to complete, sign, and return to the City of Renton for processing. 1. In order to be accepted, a complaint must meet the following criteria: • The allegation(s) must involve a covered basis such as race, color, national origin, gender, disability, or retaliation. • The allegation(s) must involve a program or activity of a Federal -aid recipient, sub -recipient, or contractor, or, in the case of ADA allegations, an entity open to the public. • The complaint must include the date of the alleged act of discrimination (date when the complainant(s) became aware of the alleged discrimination; or the latest instance of the conduct). City of Renton Title VI Plan 8 AGENDA ITEM #7. g) • The complaint must present a detailed description of the issues, including names and job titles of those individuals perceived as parties in the complained -of incident. The complainant(s) must accept reasonable resolution based on the City of Renton's administrative authority (reasonability to the determined by the City of Renton). 2. Upon receiving the written complaint, Human Resources, in consultation with the Title VI Coordinator will determine its jurisdiction, acceptability, need for additional information, and the investigative merit of the complaint. 3. If the complaint is against the City, the City will request the Washington State Department of Transportation (WSDOT) Office of Equal Opportunity to conduct the investigation. In the event WSDOT handles the investigation, they will follow their adopted procedures for investigating discrimination complaints, per their current State Title VI Plan. 4. If a complaint is against a sub -recipient, consultant, or contractor, under contract with the City, the appropriate Department and/or Division shall be notified of the complaint within 15 calendar days. The City will determine whether it will investigate the complaint or request WSDOT to conduct the investigation. 5. Once the City or WSDOT decides to accept the complaint for investigation, the complainant and the respondent will be notified in writing of such determination within five (5) calendar days. The complaint will be logged into the records of the Title VI Coordinator, and the basis for the allegation identified including race, color, national origin, handicap/disability, age or sex. 6. In cases where the City of Renton assumes investigation of the complaint, the City will provide the respondent with the opportunity to respond to the allegations in writing. The respondent will have ten (10) calendar days upon receipt, to furnish the City with his/her response to the allegations. 7. Within 40 calendar days of acceptance of the complaint, the City of Renton or WSDOT investigator will prepare a written investigative report for the Public Works Administrator and Mayor. This preliminary investigative report shall include a narrative description of the incident, identification of persons interviewed, findings and recommendations for disposition. 8. The investigator will discuss the report and recommendations with the Public Works Administrator and Mayor. There will be a period of 10 calendar days to discuss the report and any recommendations. The report will be modified as needed and made final for its release to the parties. 9. Once the investigative report becomes final, briefings will be scheduled with each party within 15 days. Both the complainant and the respondent shall receive a copy of the City of Renton Title VI Plan 9 AGENDA ITEM #7. g) investigative report during the briefings and will be notified of their respective appeal rights. 10. A copy of the complaint and City or WSDOT investigative report will be issued to WSDOT's External Civil Rights Branch (or the appropriate oversight agency) within 60 calendar days of the acceptance of the complaint. 11. If the complainant or respondent is not satisfied with the results of the investigation of the alleged discriminatory practice(s) he or she shall be advised of their rights to appeal the decision to WSDOT, U.S. Department of Transportation or U.S. Department of Justice. The complainant has 180 calendar days after the appropriate agency's final resolution to appeal to USDOT. Unless new facts not previously considered come to light, reconsideration of the final determination by the investigating agency will not be available. 12. The Title VI Coordinator will maintain an annual Log Of Complaints, which will contain the following information for each complaint filed: • The name and address of the person filing the complaint • The date of the complaint • The basis of the complaint • The disposition of the complaint • The status of the complaint Only qualified, well -trained investigators should conduct these investigations. No agency is allowed to investigate a complaint against itself. 13. A complaint may be dismissed for the following reasons: • The complainant requests the withdrawal of the complaint. • The complainant fails to respond to repeated requests for additional information needed to process the complaint. • The complainant cannot be located after reasonable attempts. vl. Sub -Recipient Review and Remedial Action Procedures A. Title VI Review of Sub -recipients of Federal -Aid Highway Funds. Transportation Title VI Specialists and the Title VI Coordinator will assist WSDOT to periodically conduct Title VI compliance reviews. Transportation Division staff will review select recipients of Federal -aid highway or other Federal funds, to ensure adherence to Title VI requirements (see Section VII). The Title VI Coordinator will work cooperatively to periodically confirm operational guidelines provided to consultants, contractors, and sub -recipients, including Title VI language, provisions, and related requirements, as applicable. City of Renton Title VI Plan 10 AGENDA ITEM #7. g) B. Post -Grant Reviews. The Coordinator will collaborate with Transportation staff to conduct periodic post grant reviews of select recipients of Federal highway funds or other Federal funds, for roads, sidewalks, bridges, municipal construction, etc. to ensure adherence to Title VI requirements (see Section VII). Appropriate staff will periodically confirm that operational guidelines provided to consultants, contractors and sub -recipients include Title VI language and provisions and related requirements, where applicable. C. Remedial Action. When irregularities occur in the administration of Federal -aid highway programs at either the City or sub -recipient levels, corrective action will be taken to resolve identified Title VI issues. The City of Renton will seek the cooperation of the consultant, contractor or other sub -recipient in correcting deficiencies found during periodic reviews. The City will provide technical assistance and guidance, upon request, to support voluntary compliance by the sub -recipient. When conducting Title VI compliance reviews, the City will reduce to writing any recommended remedial action agreed upon by the Transportation Division and sub -recipient, and provide a copy of the letter within a period not to exceed 45 days. Sub -recipients placed in a deficiency status will be given a reasonable time, not to exceed 90 days after receipt of the deficiency letter, to voluntarily correct deficiencies. When a sub - recipient fails or refuses to voluntarily comply with requirements within the allotted time frame, the City of Renton will submit to WSDOT and FHWA copies of the case file and a recommendation that the sub -recipient be found in noncompliance. A follow-up review will be conducted within 180 days of the initial review to ascertain if the sub -recipient has complied with the Title VI Program requirements in correcting deficiencies previously identified. If the sub -recipient refuses to comply, the City of Renton and WSDOT may, with FHWA's concurrence, initiate sanctions per 49 CFR 21. VII. Title VI Implementation Activities in Special Emphasis Program Areas A. Planning & Location Activities 1. Planning Process. The Transportation Planning Section has responsibility for providing long-range planning, program development, and capital programming necessary to provide efficient transportation services to City of Renton citizens. The City annually updates and coordinates its six -year plan for transportation improvement programs and projects. The update informs other City of Renton departments and neighboring jurisdictions of the current planning direction for transportation needs. Projects included in the update are the result of evaluation and prioritization of needs in various transportation areas. The evaluation process includes input from the City Title VI Coordinator, various departments, cities, local jurisdictions and organizations, citizen groups, and private individuals. All six -year plans are consistent with the adopted Comprehensive Plan approved under the State's Growth Management Act. City of Renton Title VI Plan 11 AGENDA ITEM #7. g) 2. Authorities. Renton City Code; 23 CFR 450; RCW 35.77; RCW 36; RCW 47.06 Statewide Transportation Planning; RCW 47.80 Regional Transportation Planning Organization (RTPO). 3. Public Involvement in Planning Activities & Title VI. a) The Transportation Division will invite participation of a cross section of the populace from social, economic, and ethnic groups in the planning process by disseminating written program information to minority media and ethnic organizations, and providing public service announcements for all local media, when forming citizen advisory committees or planning boards, and requesting involvement. b) Transportation Division staff will obtain demographic statistics at applicable community meetings and public hearings involving transportation planning sessions. Data will be gathered through use of a voluntary self -reporting form which includes race, gender, and national origin. Copies of the completed forms will be provided to Title VI Coordinator after each meeting. c) To ensure access to public meetings, evening meetings will be conducted in a variety of community buildings throughout the City, including those along transit routes. Staff will ensure translation services are available if anticipated, and ensure public meetings are held in predominantly minority communities when transportation projects will specifically impact those communities. B. Consultant Contracts Activities 1. Consultant Contracts Administration. The Design Section is responsible for recommending consultant firms to support Transportation Division activities. Project Managers participate in final selection, negotiation and award. Pursuant to City of Renton Purchasing, Bidding and Contracting Policy, the signing authority of the consultant contracts may be the Public Works Administrator or the Mayor. In coordination with project managers, the Design Section Manager administers awarded consultant contracts. 2. Authorities. City of Renton Code; WSDOT Local Agency Guidelines; 48 CFR 31; 23 CFR 172 3. Consultant Selection Process. Transportation staff or project management staff will request qualifications from consulting engineering firms specializing in various aspects of civil engineering which may relate to transportation projects and the development of construction plans and special provisions for roads and bridges, design work associated with structures, performing environmental studies or preparing NEPA or SEPA documents for transportation projects. Consultant selection from the certified list maintained by the MRSC adheres to Washington State regulations (RCWs) and is consistent with City of Renton vendor policies. 4. Title VI Assurances and Provisions Transportation Division staff will: City of Renton Title VI Plan 12 AGENDA ITEM #7. g) a) Include applicable Disadvantaged Business Enterprise (DBE) goals in designated projects, and seek to proactively achieve the goal(s). b) Include Title VI assurance and provision language in all Federally funded consultant contracts. Periodically review documents and language to ensure compliance with current laws and regulations. Provide a copy of the contract to the Title VI Coordinator, and any amendments or updates that may occur over time. c) Maintain updated demographic data on the utilization of women -and minority -owned consulting firms. As they occur, a copy of the award letter will be provided to the Title VI Coordinator for use in preparing the Annual Update Accomplishment Report. C. Design & Engineering / Environmental Activities 1. Capital Improvement Projects(CIP): The Design Section is responsible for implementing the Capital Improvement Program (CIP) and environmental permitting for projects. Studies are performed to assess various environmental factors as they relate to the implementation of the City's transportation capital program, including evaluating demographic data. 2. Authorities. Renton City Code; Local Agency Guidelines - WSDOT- M36-63; Standard Plans For Road, Bridge and Municipal Construction-WSDOT; APWA - M21-01; Title 23, USC 109(d), 14(a), 217, 315 and 402(a); 23 CFR 1204.4; 23 CFR 771; EO 12898; 49 CFR 1.48(b)(33) and 1.48(c)(2; National Environmental Policy Act of 1969, 42 USC 4321; 40 CFR Part 1500; 49 CFR Part 622; WSDOT EPM M31-1; EO 12898 3. Design /Environmental Review Process and Title VI Transportation Division Staff will: a) Depending on the scope, complexity, and impacts of a project, a National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA), NEPA Categorical Exclusion, NEPA Environmental Assessment, State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA) checklist, SEPA Determination of Non Significance, or NEPA and/or SEPA Environmental Impact Statement will be completed. b) Monitor compliance with Title VI requirements in all aspects of conducting Environmental Impact Statements or Assessments. Provide a comprehensive summary of the demographic and environmental data elements to be considered by the EIS/EIA process to the Title VI Coordinator; including updated summary lists as applicable. c) Incorporate into the review process adequate time for the Coordinator to review and comment, as applicable, on the draft EIS/EIA to ensure there are no violations of the Federal Civil Rights Act, as amended, as a result of the City's Federal -Aid highway activities. d) In order to ensure dissemination of information and foster participation from affected populations, place public notices in applicable general and minority media; select accessible locations and times for public hearings or meetings, and arrange for translation services as needed; particularly in projects impacting predominantly minority City of Renton Title VI Plan 13 AGENDA ITEM #7. g) communities. Ensure the public has information pertaining to their rights to call or write the department to view plans and discuss environmental problems. e) Obtain demographic data at community meetings and public hearings pertaining to the transportation design phase. Data will be gathered through use of a voluntary sign-up form which includes race, gender, and preferred language to receive information. Copies of the voluntary self -reporting forms will be provided to the Title VI Coordinator after each meeting. f) Provide a copy of the Annual Construction Report to the Title VI Coordinator in or around August of each year. The Title VI Coordinator will work with the city's GIS Section to generate a map of the Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) funded transportation projects to include demographic data of the neighborhoods effected by the projects. D. Right-of-way Activities 1. Real Property Services. The Design Section, through consultants with expertise in right-of-way acquisition, manages and coordinates the appraisal and acquisition of real property and relocation assistance services for transportation projects. The right of way acquisition process entails appraisal of property, negotiation of terms and conditions for acquisition, and assistance in the relocation of displaced individuals, businesses, farm operations, nonprofit organizations, and property management. 2. Authorities. Right of Way Manual; 23 CFR 130; 49 CFR 24; RCW Chapter 47; WAC 468. 100 3. Right-of-way Activities and Title VI The Design Section staff will: a) Ensure equal opportunity in all aspects of procuring real estate service contracting and appraisal agreements. Follow adopted City of Renton vendor procurement policies in the acquisition of contracted services. b) Utilize current OMWBE directories identifying fee appraiser organizations and the Washington State Department of Transportation's list of certified fee appraisers when seeking services. Maintain data on awards to minority and female appraisers, and provide data to the Title VI Coordinator on a quarterly basis. c) Follow the guidelines in the Right of Way Manual for property acquisition as well as applicable laws and regulations, including Title VI and Section 504. d) Adhere to departmental policy of apprising affected property owners, tenants, and others involved in right-of-way acquisition of their rights and options regarding negotiation, relocation, condemnation and other aspects of the acquisition process. e) Provide copies of relocation assistance literature produced by WSDOT and a copy of the City of Renton Title VI Compliance brochure to all affected parties. City of Renton Title VI Plan 14 AGENDA ITEM #7. g) f) Incorporate Title VI language in all surveys of property owners and tenants. Coordinate the preparation of deeds, permits and leases to ensure the inclusion of the appropriate clauses, including Title VI Language. g) Ensure that appraised values and communications associated with the appraisal and negotiation operations result in equitable treatment. h) Ensure comparable replacement dwellings are available and assistance is given to all displaced persons and entities by the property acquisition process. i) Maintain statistical data including race, color, national origin, and sex on all relocatees affected by Transportation Federal Highway Administration funded projects, and provide detailed demographic data quarterly to the Title VI Coordinator. E. Construction Activities 1. Construction: -Design Section. The implementation of capital improvements projects is performed by the Design Section (mentioned above). This section is also responsible for administration of all new construction contracts and inspecting bridges. The Transportation Division is responsible for oversight and the administration of transportation construction projects, as set forth by policy decisions and supervision of the Public Works Administrator. 2. Authorities. City of Renton Standards, Construction Manual M41-01; Maintenance Manual M51-01; Local Agency Guidelines; Standard Specifications for Road, Bridge, and Municipal Construction. 3. Construction Activity and Title VI Transportation Division staff will: a) Review all Federal Highway Administration funded transportation projects for application of DBE goals. As appropriate, include DBE provisions in those projects with designated goals. Include Title VI language in bid announcements and applicable construction documents, as stipulated in the City's Title VI Policy Statement (p. 2) and Assurances (Exhibit 2, p. 18-19) herein. b) Award construction contracts on the basis of lowest responsive bidder, as well as meeting DBE requirements. Include Title VI language in prime contract award letters to encourage utilization of DBE subcontracts and vendors. c) Ensure that prime contractors with DBE requirements award contracted work to qualified DBEs which perform commercially useful functions. d) Monitor all construction operations to ensure nondiscrimination throughout all operations. e) Coordinate the gathering of construction information regarding DBE participation for the Annual Title VI Report; and provide to the Coordinator. City of Renton Title VI Plan 15 AGENDA ITEM #7. g) Exhibit 1 - City of Renton Title VI Notice to the Public The City of Renton hereby gives public notice that it is the City's policy to assure full compliance with Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, the Civil Rights Restoration Act of 1987, and related statutes and regulations in all programs and activities. Title VI requires that no person shall, on the grounds of race, color, sex, or national origin be excluded from the participation in, be denied the benefits of, or be otherwise subjected to discrimination under any Federal Aid Highway program or other activity for which the City of Renton receives Federal financial assistance. Any person who believes they have been aggrieved by an unlawful discriminatory practice under Title VI has a right to file a formal complaint with the City of Renton. Any such complaint must be in writing and filed with the City of Renton Human Resources within one hundred, eighty (180) days following the date of the alleged discriminatory occurrence. Title VI Discrimination Complaint Forms may be obtained from the City's website (www.rentonwa.gov) or from the Human Resources office at no cost to the complainant by calling (425) 430-7655. City of Renton Title VI Plan 16 AGENDA ITEM #7. g) Exhibit 2 — City of Renton Title VI Assurances The City of Renton in the State of Washington, (hereinafter referred to as the "Recipient"), HEREBY AGREES THAT as a condition to receiving any Federal financial assistance from the U.S. Department of Transportation will comply with Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, 78 Stat. 252, 42 USC 2000d--42 USC 2000d--4 (hereinafter referred to as the Act), and all requirements imposed by or pursuant to Title 49, Code of Federal Regulations, Department of Transportation, Subtitle A, Office of the Secretary part 21, Nondiscrimination in Federally Assisted Programs of the Department of Transportation —Effectuation of Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 (hereinafter referred to as the Regulations), and other pertinent directives, to the end that in accordance with the Act, Regulations, and other pertinent directives, no person in the United States shall, on the grounds of race, color, sex, or national origin be excluded from participation in, be denied the benefits of, or be otherwise subjected to discrimination under any program or activity for which the Recipient receives Federal financial assistance through the Washington State Department of Transportation, including the U.S. Department of Transportation and Federal Highway Administration, and HEREBY GIVES ASSURANCE THAT it will promptly take any measures necessary to effectuate this agreement. This Assurance is required by Subsection 21.7(a)( 1 ) of the Regulations. More specifically and without limiting the above general assurance, the Recipient hereby gives the following specific assurances to its Federal Aid Highway Program: 1. That the Recipient agrees that each "program" and each "facility" as defined in Subsections 21.23(e) and 21.23(b) of the Regulations, will be (with regard to a "program") conducted, or will be (with regard to a "facility") operated in compliance with all requirements imposed by, or pursuant to, the Regulations. 2. That the Recipient shall insert the following notification in all solicitations for bids for work or material subject to the Regulations made in connection with the Federal Aid Highway Program, and in adapted form in all proposals for negotiated agreements: The City of Renton, in accordance with Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 and 78 Stat. 252, 42 USC 2000d --- 42 and Title 49, Code of Federal Regulations, Department of Transportation, Subtitle A, Office of the Secretary, part 21, Nondiscrimination in Federally assisted programs of the Department of Transportation issued pursuant to such Act, hereby notifies all bidders that it will affirmatively ensure that any contract entered into pursuant to this advertisement, minority business enterprises will be afforded full opportunity to submit bids in response to this invitation and will not be discriminated against on the grounds of race, color, sex, or national origin in consideration for an award. 3. That the Recipient shall insert the clauses of Appendix 1 of this Assurance in every highway contract subject to the Act and the Regulations. 4. That the Recipient shall insert the clauses of Appendix 2 of this Assurance, as a covenant running with the land, in any deed from the United States effecting a transfer of real property, structures, or improvements thereon, or interest therein for highway purposes. City of Renton Title VI Plan 17 AGENDA ITEM #7. g) 5. That where the Recipient receives Federal financial assistance to construct a facility, or part of a facility, the Assurance shall extend to the entire facility and facilities operated in connection therewith. 6. That where the Recipient receives Federal highway financial assistance in the form, or for the acquisition of real property, or an interest in real property, the Assurance shall extend rights to space on, over or under such property. 7. That the Recipient shall include the appropriate clauses set forth in Appendix 3 of this Assurance, as a covenant running with the land, in any future deeds, leases, permits, licenses, and similar agreements entered into by the Recipient with other parties: (a) for the subsequent transfer of real property acquired or improved under the Federal Aid Highway Program; and (b) for the construction or use of or access to space on, over or under real property acquired, or improved under the Federal Aid Highway Program. 8. That this Assurance obligates the Recipient for the period during which Federal financial assistance is extended to the program, or is in the form of, personal property, or real property or interest therein or structures or improvements there on, in which case the Assurance obligates the Recipient or any transferee for the longer of the following periods: (a) the period during which the property is used for a purpose for which the Federal financial assistance is extended, or for another purpose involving the provision of similar services or benefits; or (b) the period during which the Recipient retains ownership or possession of the property. 9. The Recipient shall provide for such methods of administration for the program as are found by the Secretary of Transportation, or the official to whom s/he delegates specific authority to give reasonable guarantee that it, other recipients, sub -grantees, contractors, subcontractors, transferees, successors in interest, and other participants of Federal financial assistance under such program will comply with all requirements imposed or pursuant to the Act, the Regulations, and this Assurance. 10. The Recipient agrees that the United States has a right to seek judicial endorsement with regard to any matter arising under the Act, the Regulations, and this Assurance. THIS ASSURANCE is given in consideration of and for the purpose of obtaining any and all Federal grants, loans, contracts, property, discounts or other Federal financial assistance extended after the date hereof to the Recipient by the U.S. Department of Transportation under the Federal Aid Highway Program and is binding on it, other recipients, sub -grantees, contractors, subcontractors, transferees, successors in interest and other participants in the Federal Aid Highway Program. The person whose signature appears below is authorized to sign this Assurance on behalf of the Recipient. Mayor Public Works Administrator City of Renton Title VI Plan Date Date In AGENDA ITEM #7. g) Appendix 1 - Title VI Assurances For Consultants, Contractors, Subcontractors, Suppliers, and Manufacturers The City of Renton will insert or add the following clauses into every highway contract subject to the Act and Regulations associated with the receipt of Federal financial assistance: During the performance of this contract, the contractor, for itself, its assignees and successors in interest (hereinafter referred to as the "contractor") agrees as follows: 1. Compliance with Regulations. The contractor shall comply with the Regulations relative to nondiscrimination in Federally assisted programs of the Department of Transportation (hereinafter DOT), Title 49, Code of Federal Regulations, part 21, as they may be amended from time to time, (hereinafter referred to as the Regulations), which are herein incorporated by reference and made a part of this contract. 2. Nondiscrimination. The contractor, with regard to the work performed during the contract, shall not discriminate on the grounds of race, color, sex, or national origin in the selection and retention of subcontractors, including procurement of materials and leases of equipment. The contractor shall not participate either directly or indirectly in the discrimination prohibited by Section 21.5 of the Regulations, including employment practices when the contract covers a program set forth in Appendix B of the Regulations. 3. Solicitations for Subcontracts, including Procurement of Materials and Equipment. In all solicitations either by competitive bidding or negotiations made by the contractor for work to be performed under a subcontract, including procurement of materials or leases of equipment, each potential subcontractor or supplier shall be notified by the contractor of the contractor's obligations under this contract and the Regulations relative to nondiscrimination on the ground of race, color, sex, or national origin. 4. Information and Reports. The contractor shall provide all information and reports required by the Regulations or directives issued pursuant thereto, and shall permit access to its books, records, accounts, other sources of information, and its facilities as may be determined by the City of Renton or the Washington State Department of Transportation to be pertinent to ascertain compliance with such Regulations, orders and instructions. Where any information required of a contractor is in the exclusive possession of another who fails or refuses to furnish this information, the contractor shall so certify to the City of Renton, or the Washington State Department of Transportation as appropriate, and shall set forth what efforts it has made to obtain the information. 5. Sanctions for Noncompliance. In the event of the contractor's noncompliance with the nondiscrimination provisions of this contract, The City of Renton and the Washington State Department of Transportation shall impose such contract sanctions as it, or the Federal Highway Administration may determine to be appropriate, including, but not limited to: City of Renton Title VI Plan 19 AGENDA ITEM #7. g) a) Withholding of payments to the contractor under the contract until the contractor complies, and/or; b) Cancellation, termination, or suspension of the contract, in whole or in part. 6. Incorporation of Provisions. The contractor shall include the provisions of paragraphs (1) through (6) in every subcontract, including procurement of materials and leases of equipment, unless exempt by the Regulations, or directives issued pursuant thereto. The contractor shall take such action with respect to any subcontractor or procurement as the City of Renton or the U.S. Department of Transportation, Federal Highway Administration, may direct as a means of enforcing such provisions including sanctions for noncompliance. Provided, however, that in the event a contractor becomes involved in, or is threatened with, litigation with a subcontractor or supplier as a result of such direction, the contractor may request the City of Renton enter into such litigation to protect the interests of the City and, in addition, the contractor may request the United States to enter into such litigation to protect the interests of the United States. City of Renton Title VI Plan 20 AGENDA ITEM #7. g) Appendix 2 - Granting and Habendum Clauses When the City of Renton is the recipient of real property, structures or improvements thereon, or interest therein from the United States for highway purposes, the following clauses shall be included in any and all deeds affecting or recording the transfer of property: GRANTING CLAUSE NOW, THEREFORE, the City of Renton, as authorized by law, will accept title to the lands and maintain the project constructed thereon, in accordance with Title 23, United States Code, the Regulations for the Administration of Federal Aid for Highways and the policies and procedures prescribed by the Federal Highway Administration of the Department of Transportation and, also in accordance with and in compliance with all requirements imposed by or pursuant to Title 49, Code of Federal Regulations, Department of Transportation, Subtitle A, Office of the Secretary, part 21, Nondiscrimination in Federally assisted programs of the Department of Transportation (hereinafter referred to as the Regulations) pertaining to and effectuating the provisions of Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 (78 Stat. 252:42 USC 2000d to 2000d--4) does hereby remise, release, quitclaim, and convey unto the City of Renton all the right, title, and interest of the Department of Transportation in and to said land described in Exhibit A attached hereto and made a part thereof. HABENDUM CLAUSE TO HAVE AND TO HOLD said lands and interests therein unto the City of Renton, and its successors forever, subject, however, to the covenants, conditions, restrictions and reservations herein contained as follows, which will remain in effect for the period during which the real property or structures are used for a purpose for which the Federal financial assistance is extended or for another purpose involving the provision of similar services or benefits and shall be binding on the City of Renton, its successors, and assigns. The City of Renton, in consideration of the conveyance of said lands and interests in lands, does hereby covenant and agree as a covenant running with the land for itself, its successors and assigns, that (1) no person shall on the grounds of race, color, sex, or national origin be excluded from participation in, be denied the benefits of, or be otherwise subjected to discrimination with regard to any facility located wholly or in part on, over, or under such lands hereby conveyed (,) (and)' (2) that the City of Renton, shall use the lands and interests in lands so conveyed, in compliance with all requirements imposed by or pursuant to Title 49, Code of Federal Regulations, Department of Transportation, Subtitle A, Office of the Secretary, part 21, Nondiscrimination of Federally assisted programs of the Department of Transportation -- Effectuation of Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, and as said Regulations may be amended (,) and (3) that in the event of breach of any of the above mentioned nondiscrimination conditions, the City shall have a right to reenter said lands and facilities on said land, and the above described land and facilities shall thereon revert to and vest in and become the absolute property of the Department of Transportation and its assigns as such interest existed prior to this instruction. I Reverter Clause and related language to be used only when it is determined that such a clause is necessary in order to effectuate the purposes of Title VI of Civil Rights Act of 1964. City of Renton Title VI Plan 21 AGENDA ITEM #7. g) Appendix 3 - Lease/Deed Provisions Upon receipt of Federal financial assistance to construct a facility or part of a facility for highway purposes, the Recipient agrees to include these clauses in all future deeds, licenses, leases, permits, or similar instruments entered into by the City of Renton pursuant to the provisions of Title VI Assurances, item 7: The LESSEE, for himself or herself, his or her heirs, personal representatives, successors in interest, and assigns, as a part of the consideration hereof, does hereby covenant and agree as a covenant running with the land that in the event facilities are constructed, maintained, or otherwise operated on the said property described in this lease, for a purpose for which a US Department of Transportation program or activity is extended or for another purpose involving the provision of similar services or benefits, the LESSEE shall maintain and operate such facilities and services in compliance with all other requirements imposed pursuant to Title 49, Code of Federal Regulations, U.S. Department of Transportation, Subtitle A, Office of the Secretary, part 21, Nondiscrimination in Federally assisted programs of the U.S. Department of Transportation -- Effectuation of Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as said Regulations may be amended. That in the event of breach of any of the above non-discrimination covenants, the City shall have the right to terminate the lease, and to reenter and repossess said land and the facilities thereon, and hold the same as if said lease had never been made or issued. The following shall be included in all deeds, licenses, leases, permits, or similar agreements entered into by the City of Renton pursuant to the provisions of Title VI Assurances, item 7. The LESSEE, for himself or herself, his or her personal representatives, successors in interest, and assigns, as a part of the consideration hereof, does hereby covenant and agree as a covenant running with the land that (1) no person, on the grounds of race, color, sex, or national origin shall be excluded from participation in, be denied the benefits of, or be otherwise subjected to discrimination in the use of said facilities, (2) that in the construction of any improvements on, over or under such land and furnishing of services thereon, no person on the grounds of race, color, sex, or national origin shall be excluded from participation in, denied the benefits of, or otherwise be subjected to discrimination, (3) that the LESSEE shall use the premises in compliance with all requirements imposed by or pursuant to Title 49, Code of Federal Regulations, U.S. Department of Transportation, Subtitle A, Office of the Secretary, part 21, Nondiscrimination in Federally assisted programs of the U.S. Department of Transportation --- Effectuation of Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, and as said Regulations may be amended. That in the event of breach of any of the above nondiscrimination covenants, the City of Renton shall have the right to terminate the lease, and to re-enter and repossess said land and the facilities thereon, and hold the same as if said lease had never been made or issued. City of Renton Title VI Plan 22 AGENDA ITEM #7. g) Appendix 4 — Organizational Charts CITY OF RENTON CURONCTIMI CHYCOek CR InCme µ ,pp}R1COilrt]tlD6E cerrueeinoeon CHFI Aa MkJ ISie n i1VFOii CiR City of Renton Title VI Plan 23 AGENDA ITEM #7. g) `Transportation Operations Manager Engineering Specialist II Civil Engineer III PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT Transportation Systems Division "Transp artation Systems Director Admiiistrative5euetaryl Administrative 5ecretaryl Secretary II *Transportation "Transportation "Transportation Maintenance Manager Design Manager Planning Manager 5ecretary II Signal/Electronic 5ystems Supervisor 5ignal/Electronic 5ystem Technician III Signal/Electronic System Technician II Traffic Signage & Marking Sup ervisor Traffic Maintenance Worker II Principal Civil Engineer Civil Engineer III *Individuals marked with an asterisk serve as a Title VI Specialist or Coordinator. City of Renton Title VI Plan "Transportation Planner `Program Develop men[ Coordinator I Civil Engineer III B 24 AGENDA ITEM #7. h) AB - 2305 C[TY OF -----wwwo�Renton uOo�" SUBJECT/TITLE: Project Acceptance: Sunset Lane NE Improvements Project; CAG-16- 049 with Road Construction Northwest RECOMMENDED ACTION: Council Concur DEPARTMENT: Transportation Systems Division STAFF CONTACT: Keith Woolley, Civil Engineer EXT.: 7318 The initial contract with Road Construction Northwest was for $4,704,215. Change orders increased the final amount 12% to $5,270,424. The total project budget was $7,535,416 and the final contract amount falls within the project budget. The project budget for the construction phase was $4,821,549 of City funds. This project constructed new roadway, raised intersections, paving, curb, gutter, sidewalk, street lighting, landscaping, storm drainage, franchise utility infrastructure and infrastructure for the city's stormwater, sanitary sewer and water utilities. The project started August 15, 2016 and was completed June 22, 2018. A total of 23 change orders were issued during the project. Change Order No. 8 alone accounted for 61% of the project increase, as it compensated the contractor $347,509.67 for delays due to a conflict with Puget Sound Energy (PSE) infrastructure. However PSE reimbursed the City for 92% of this delay change order. Taking into account this reimbursement by PSE, the overall increase in the project amount was 5.2%. The remaining change orders were due to minor revisions to all areas of work in the scope of the project. The project is completed and acceptance by Council is requested. A. Notice of Completion of Public Works Contract B. Final Contract Voucher Certificate C. Final Progress Payment No. 21 Authorize the Mayor and City Clerk to accept completion of the Sunset Lane NE Improvements Project CAG-16-049 with Road Construction Northwest, subject to receiving the required certifications. Date: AGENDA ITEM #7, h) a� Original Revised # 0 NOTICE OF COMPLETION OF PUBLIC WORKS CONTRACT Contractor's UBI Number: 602 286 010 Name & Mailing Address of Public Agency Department Use Only City of enton Assigned to: 1055 S Gradv Wav Renton, WA 98057 Date Assigned: URI Number: 177 000 094 Notice is hereby given relative to the completion of contract or project described helow Project Name Contract Number Job Order Contracting Sunset Lane NE Improvements Project CAG-16-049 ❑ Yes VNo Description of Work Done/include Jobsite Address(es) Project Location: Sunset Lane NE. Improvements include construction of new roadway, raised intersections, paving, curb and gutter, sidewalk, street lighting, landscaping, storm drainage, franchise utility, storm{ sewer, sanitary sewer, and water infrastructure. Federally funded transportation project? ElYes LYI No (if yes, provide Contract Bond Statement below) Contractor's Name I E-mail Address Affidavit ID* Road Construction Northwest info@rcnw.com 1830578 Contractor Address Telephone # P.O. Box 2228, Renton, WA 98056 (425) 254-9999 If Retainage is not withheld, please select one of the following and List Surety's Name & Bond Number. ❑ Retainage Bond ❑ Contract/Payment bond (valid for federally liinded transportation projects) Name: 113ond Number: Date Contract Awarded Date Work Commenced Date Work Completed Date Work Accepted June 27, 2016 August 15, 2016 June 22, 2018 January 28, 2019 Were Subcontracters used on this project? If so, please complete Addendum A. Yes ❑ No Affidavit ID* - No L&I release will be granted until all affidavits are listed. Contract Amount Additions ( + ) Reductions (- ) Sub -Total Sales Tax Rate 9.5 , 10.0 % (Ir various rates apply, please send a breakdown) Sales Tax Amount Comments: $ 4,704,215.56 $ 545,119.77 $ 128,820.95 $ 5,120, 514.38 149910.33 TOTAL $ 5,270,424.71 rvu r c: l nese rwo roans nursr ne Liquidated Damages $ 0.00 Amount Disbursed $ 5,014,398.99 Amount Retained $ 256,025.72 TOTAL $ 5,270,424.71 Note: The Disbursing Officcr must submit this completed notice immediately after acceptance ofthe work, done under this contract. NO PAYMENT SHALL BE MADE FROM RETAINED FUNDS until receipt of all release certificates. Submitting Form: Please submit the completed form by entail to all three agencies belox, Contact Name: Natalie wissbrod Email Address: nwissbrod@rentonwa.gov PCDepartment or Revenue Washington Skase Depxanmt of Public Works Section Labor & Industries (360} 704 5650 Contract Release PWC@dor.wa.gov (855) 545-8163. option # 4 ContraCiRelease@LN I. WA.GOV REV 31 0020c (10/26/15) 1`215-038-000 10-2014 Title: Accounting Asst IV Phone Number: 425-430-5919 Employment Security Department ment Registration, Inquiry, Standards & Coordination Unit (360) 902-9450 p u b l i cwo rks @ es d. w a, gav CONTRACT: CONTRACTOR: Contract Summary CITY OF RENTON Public Works Department CHANGE ORDER SUMMARY Sunset Lane NE Improvements Road Construction NW Original Contract: $ 4,704,215.56 Change Order No. 1 $ 30,000.00 Change Order No. 2 $ 94,434.26 Change Order No. 3 $ 13,051.22 Change Order No. 4 $ 7,010.40 Change Order No. 5 $ 9,200.50 Change Order No. 6 $ (4,497.90) Change Order No. 7 $ 13,183.06 Change Order No. 8 $ 347,509.67 Change Order No. 9 $ 5,149.20 Change Order No. 10 $ 12,650.00 Change Order No. 11 $ (7,307.52) Change Order No. 12 $ 33,000.00 Change Order No. 13 $ 5,500.00 Change Order No. 14 $ 10,000.00 Change Order No. 15 $ 11,500.59 Change Order No. 16 $ 14,505.70 Change Order No. 17 $ 16,500.00 Change Order No. 18 $ 12,012.50 Change Order No. 19 $ 22,000.00 Change Order No. 20 $ 15,500.00 Change Order No. 21 $ 448.00 Change Order No. 22 $ 19,875.00 Change Order No. 23 $ (115,015.53) Adjusted Total $ 5,270,424.71 A $ 566,209.15 12.04% CAG-16-049 description Construction Management Field Office Roadway Excavation Inc. Haul above 125% Century Link Revisions Class 4000 Concrete Park Utility Stubouts Sidewalk Removal (reduction) Sales Tax revision PSE Delay Claim (PSE Reimbursement - $318,666) Colpits catch basin upsize and cleanout Utilitiy Adjustments for Park Library Driveway Modification Library Sanitary Sewer Stubs Added Wall at Existing Light Pole Replace Park Stom Stub Illumination Revisions Water Revisions Sewer Revisions Civil Revisions Joint Utility Trench Revisions RHA site and project; and revised traffic control Landscape Revisions Various Revisions (Storm, S/W Sawcut, Temp ADA, Irrigation) Reconciliation Addendum A: Please List all Subcontractors and Sub -tiers Below This addendum can be submitted in other formats. Provide known affidavits at this time. No L&I release will he eranted until all affidavits are listed. Subcontractor's Name: UBI Number: (Required) Affidavit ID* American Surveying and Environmental LLC 603226051 784427 APPLY A LINE INC 600553941 813503 APPLY -A -LINE LLC 600553941 813500 BAG LADY INC, THE 601734719 747530 BEST PARKING LOT CLEANING INC 601901928 784641 Brundage Bone Concrete Pumping, Inc. 600630026 804578 Cadman Inc. 176000099 747423 CALIBER CONCRETE CONST INC 601156625 808059 CANNON CONSTRUCTION INC 601590363 777325 CORLISS RESOURCES INC 602237779 787502 GARY MERLINO CONST CO INC 600584952 809082 GRASS MASTER 601517336 810114 HD SUPPLY WATERWORKS LTD 602456211 833332 MCCANN TRUCKING & EXCAVATING 602286020 829585 Miles Sand & Gravel Company 171004760 811844 Mulier Construction LLC 603391521 734062 NORTHSHORE PAVING INC 600635278 815172 O M A CONSTRUCTION INC 601872128 790645 SALINAS SAWING & SEALING INC 601717158 785504 SILVERSTREAK INC 600432781 791136 Sunbelt Rentals Inc 602053709 729835 WEST COAST LANDSCAPE & DEV INC 601227266 810768 WEST COAST SIGNAL INC 603149602 812792 Western Crane Inc. 601713857 667980 For tax assistance or to request this document in an alternate format, please call 1-800-647-7706. Teletype (TTY) users may use the Washington Relay Service by calling 711. REV 31 0020e Addendum (10/26/15) F215-038-000 10-2014 h) AGENDA ITEM #7. h) URI Nkw Final Contract Voucher Certificate Contractor Road Construction Northwest Street Address P.O. Box 188 City State Zip Date Renton WA 98057 October 13, 2018 State Project Number Federal -Aid Project Number Highway Number n/a n/a n/a Contract Title Sunset Lane NE Improvements Project; CAG-16-049 Date Work Physically Completed Final Amount Including Sales Tax June 22, 2018 $ 5,270,424.71 Contractor's Certification I, the undersigned, having first been duly sworn, certify that I am authorized to sign for the claimant; that in connection with the work performed and to the best of my knowledge no loan, gratuity or gift in any form whatsoever has been extended to any employee of the City of Renton Washington nor have I rented or purchased any equipment or materials from any employee of the City of Renton; 1 further certify that the attached final estimate is a true and correct statement showing all the monies due me from the City of Renton for work performed and material furnished under this contract; that I have carefully examined said final estimate and understand the same and that I hereby release the City of Renton from any and all claims of whatsoever nature which I may have, arising out of the performance of said contract, which are not set forth in said estim te. X (4-1 on rap o igna ure Required Jeffrey M. Kanyer, President Printed Signature Name City of Renton Certification I certify the attached final estimate to be based upon actual measurements, and to be true and correct. Approved Date X /C-, - , Z I,- X Project ngineer rolec minis ra or Cp lure an o a io esign M&6ger Signature City of Renton Acceptance The City of Renton hereby accepts the completed contract, pursuant to Section 1-05.12 of the Contract Provisions. X Public Works Administrator Date 01 UouncilAcceptance Contractor's claims, if any, must be included, and the Contractor's Certification must be labeled indicating a claim attached. AGENDA ITEM #7. h) TO: FINANCE DIRECTOR Dale: IF111wmI� FROM: TRANSPORTATION DESIGN MANAGER CONTRACTOR: Road Construction Northwest P.O. Box 188, Renton, WA 98057 CONTRACT NO. CAG-16-049 ESTIMATENO. 21 PROJECT: Sunset Lane NE? Improvements 1. CONTRACTOR EARNINGS THIS ESTIMATE $ 15.211.29 2. SALES TAX @ 10.00% S 152.32 3. TOTAL CONTRACT AMOUNT THIS ESTIMATE S 15.363.60 4. EARNINGS PREVIOUSLY PAID CONTRACTOR $ 4,850,037.96 5. • EARNINGS DUE CONTRACTOR THIS ESTIMATE S 14,450.72 6. SUBTOTAL - CONTRACTOR PAYMENTS $ 4,964,488.68 7. RETAINAGE ON PREVIOUS EARNINGS $ 255,261.16 S. '• RETAINAGE ON EARNINGS THIS ESTIMATE $ 7%56 9. SUBTOTAL - RETAINAGE $ 256,025.72 10. SALES TAX PREVIOUSLY PAID S 149,758.01 1 I. SALES TAX DUE THIS ESTIMATE S 152.32 12. SUBTOTAL-SALESTAX S 149,910.33 ' (95%xLINEI) " (RETAINAGE: 5%) GRAND TOTAL: $ 5,270,424.73 FINANCE DEPARTMENT ACTION: _ PAYMENT TO CONTRACTOR (Lines 5 and 11): SCHEDULE A -ROADWAY IMPROVEMENTS ACCOUNT: 317.122122.0i 6.595.30.63.001 $8.666.75 SCHEDULE B - WATER IMPROVEMENTS ACCOUNT: 425.455605.018.594.34.63.000 SOAO TAX $0.00 SCHEDULE, C - SANITARY SEWER IMPROVEMENTS ACCOUNT: 426,465513.018.594.35.63,000 $0.00 TAX $0.00 SCHEDULE D - STORMWATER ItiIPROVEMENTS ACCOUNT: 427.475507.018,594.31.63.000 S4,336.93 SCHEDULE E - UTILITY UNDER GROIINDRIG IMPROVEMENTS ACCOUNT: 317.122122.016.595.30.63.001 51 447 04 TAX $i52.32 SCHEDULE F- PARK ILLUMINATION SYSTEM ACCOUNT: 317.122122.016.595.30.63.001 $0.00 TAX $0.00 RETAINED AMOUNT (Line 8): SCHEDULE A -ROADWAY IMPROVEMENTS ACCOUNT: 317,122122,016.595.30.63.001 $456,14 SCHEDULE B - WATER IMPROVEMENTS ACCOUNT: 425.455605.018.594.3C63.000 $0.00 SCHEDULE C - SANITARY SEWER IMPROVEMENTS ACCOUNT: 426.465513.018.594.35.63.000 SO 00 SCHEDULE D-STORMWATER IMPROVEMENTS ACCOUNT: 427.475507,018.594.31.63.1XID $228 26 SCHEDULE E - UTI TIY UNDERGROUNDING IMPROVEMENTS ACCOUNT: 317,122122,016.595.30.63.001 S76.16 SCHEDULE F - PARK ILLUMINATION SYSTEM ACCOUNT; 317.122122.016.595.30,63.001 SO.00 TOTAL THIS ESTIMATE: S15,363.60 CIIA RTER 116, t.A W S Of 1965 CITY OF RENTON CERTIFICATION I, THL IJNDERti1CrNli1) DO IFF,RF.IIY CERTIIY UNIIt:R 19iNALTY OI' I'EIURY. TIIATTIIE MATI?RtALV HAVE tsgEN )URNJ1iHEn. THE SERVILTS REND$RL-D OR THE JAROR I'IiRIURMIi) AS DUCRIRI:D HEREIN. AND TFInTiNE LT.AIM IS h JU1T. DUL' AND UNPAID OIII.IGAl10N A(iAINSTTHE CITY ON RENTON. AND THAT I AM AUTHORftlRI TO AUTHENTICATU AND CERTIFY TO SAID CLAIM SICKED, AGENDA ITEM #7. h) TO: FINANCE DIRECTOR Date: 09/10/2018 FROM: TRANSPORTATION DESIGN MANAGER CONTRACTOR: Road Construction Northwest P.O. Box 188, Renton, WA 980S7 CONTRACT NO. CAG-16.049 ESTIMATE NO. 21 PROJECT: Sunset Lane NE Improvements 1. CONTRACTOR EARNINGS THIS ESTIMATE S 15.211.28 2. SALES TAX @ 10.00% S 152.32 3. TOTAL CONTRACT AMOUNT THIS ESTIMATE S 15,363.60 4. EARNINGS PREVIOUSLY PAID CONTRACTOR S 4.850.037.96 5. • EARNINGS DUE CONTRACTOR THIS ESTIMATE S 14.450.72 6. SUBTOTAL - CONTRACTOR PAYMENTS S 4,864,488.68 7. RETAINAGE ON PREVIOUS EARNINGS S 255265.16 S. '• RETAINAGE ON EARNINGS THIS ESTIMATE $ 76056 9. SUBTOTAL- RETAINAGE S 256,025.72 10. SALES TAX PREVIOUSLY PAID S 149,758.01 11. SALES TAX DUE THIS ESTIMATE S 15232 12. SUBTOTAL - SALES TAX S 149,910.33 • (95%xUNE1) •• (RETA INAGE-5%) GRAND TOTAL: S $,270A24.73 FINANCE DEPARTMENT ACTION: PAYMENT TO CONTRACTOR (Lines 5 and 11): SCHEDULE A - ROADWAY IMPROVEMENTS ACCOUNT: 317.122122.016.595.30.63.001 S8,666.75 SCHEDULE B - WATER IMPROVEMENTS ACCOUNT: 425.455605.01859434.63.000 $0.00 TAX $0.00 SCHEDULE C - SANITARY SEWER IMPROVEMENTS S ACCOUNT: 426.465513.018.594.35.63.000 SCHEDULE D - STORMWATER IMPROVEMENTS ACCOUNT: 427.475507 018,594.31.63.000 SCHEDULE E - UTILITY UNDERGROUNDING IMPROVEMENT'S ACCOUNT: 317.122122.016.595.30.63.001 SCHEDULE F- PARK ILLUMWAT'ION SYSTEM ACCOUNT: 3 l 7.122122-016.595 3 0.63.001 RETAINED AMOUNT (Line 8): SCHEDULER-ROADWAYIMPROVEMENFS ACCOUNT: 317.122122.016595.30.63.001 SCHEDULE B- WATER IMPROVEMENTS ACCOUNT: 425.455605.018594.34.63.000 SCHEDULE C - SANITARY SEWER IMPROVEMENTS ACCOUNT: 426A65513.018.594.35.63 A00 D- STORKWATERIMPRO MF.NTS ACCOUNT: 427A75507.018594.31.63.000 SCHEDULE E - UTILITY UNDERGROUNDING IMPROVEMENTS ACCOUNT. 317.122122.016.595.30.63.001 SCHEDULE F - PARK ILLUMINATION SYSTEM ACCOUNT: 317.122122.016.595.30.63.001 CHARTER 116, IA WS OF 1%5 SO.00 TAX $0.00 $4,336.43 � V $1.447.04 TAX $152.32 $0.00 TAX $0.00 S456.14 $0.00 $0.00 S228.26 $76.16 SO.00 TOTAL THIS ESTIMATE: $15.363.60 CITY OF RENTON CERTIFICATION L THE UNDERSIGNED DO t"EDY CERTE Y UNDER PENALTY Cl PERJURY. THAT TICE MATERIALS HAVE DEEN FURNISHED. THL SERVICES RCNDLRED OR THE LAUOR 11E1e OXXtCD M OLSCRIOM HERFIN. AND THAT THE 0" LS A JUST. DUE AND UNPAID OnUGATION AGAIKS r THE OTY Or RFMON, AND TUT 1 AM AUTHORIZED TO ALMHU!N TICATC AND CERTIFY TO SNU CLAtM 5K.NLD: AGENDA ITEM #7, h) Progress Payment # 21 Curoff Da re. 61301201E Contractor: Road Construction Northwest PO Box 188 Renton, WA 98057 Contractor Reg # RCNW*CN978L6 Phone # 425-254-9999 PROGRESS PAYMENT SUMMARY ={% VhpERTEETNkav 505 Fthh Ave. S. Suite 300, Seattle, WA, 981051 P206.436.0515 Project; Sunset Lane NE Improvements CAG-16-049 Contracted Amount OriginalControci 5 4,704,215.56 Change Orders $ 681,224.68 Currently Contracted $ 5,385,440.24 Total Amount to bate Amount This Progress Payment Contract Bid Item Work Materials on Hand 5 5,120,514.37 $ 15,211.28 5 0.00 $ Sales Tax State DOR Rule 17) lncludedinunit bidpdcesinScheeduleAand D $ 149,910.3 $$ 152.32 Less Retainage (5%) $ (255,265.16) $ (760.56) Payment to Contractor $ 5,015,159,55 $ 14,603.04 Prepared 6y. Reviewed by.- {ESK r �erf (R�{dij'onsrrvenon NorhwerrJ � Reviewedby: to'r' Shn.Kt brry, rdcnr fngmeer (Pmreell Reviewedby: p r 11.!lM,rch !!, P. lecrMonog//er (Prledl Approvedby. � Krrrh W all , Prolrrr Monnger (C, of 1 Appro.ed by: Honsan, T rporrorronOrsignManoger(CryalR nronJ Dore. ( rq Dore'-7/ l� Dore. Dore t ( Rare: 0'7- l � N % 2etr y Dore: This progress payment estimate shot! nor be used m evidence of performance or quantities nor construed as acceptance of any work under the contract. This progress payment estimate serves only as a basis for the partial payment indicated herein. AGENDA ITEM #7, h) Prevailing Wage Certification Progress Payment 21 Contractor: Road Construction Northwest PO Box 188 Renton, WA 98057 Contractor Reg # RCNW*CN978L6 Phone # 425-254-9999 PERTEET 505 Filth Avenue South, Suite 3001 Seattle, WA 98104 I PH: 206.436.0515 FAX: 425.339,6018 Froject: Sunset Lone NE Improvements CAG-16-049 I certify that the prevailing wages have been paid in accordance with the prefiled statements) of intent to pay prevailing wages on file with the public agency. This statement covers the following period: 6/1/2018 6/30/2018 month/day/year to month/day/year The following subcontractors performed work on this project during this payment period: Subcontractor Name U814 West Coast Signal 603149602 This letter shall be signed by an authorized representative of the Contractor prior to payment persuant to RCW 39.12.040 Tricia Duncan Contractor Authorized Representative 9/7/ 18 Signature Date Prag,&-Payment A' 21 C .;fD.,r 6/302018 Progress Payment Derails PERTEET SOS RIM A. 5 S..m MD. Sant., WA 98IN I P706.436 0515 Canrrpered: Prev m7aralra Dore: Tn4 $rima,e- Taral,o Dou: m No. Dacdpuan Una, Qry� UNr pe. Con acd A- Previous Quanmy ro 0.1. P.enav, Tmol A--, To N.: Quonrlry Thh E,Irmar. Amavm Thi, E,llmme Qmnfl,y+o Dom Puc Complrfc 7o1a4 A,na„mI arc Schedule A - Rood-y Imprpvemenh A! L'no..url,cl s- Cr•ana., L5: I S 30,000D0 $ 30,000.00 10128,41 S 10.f26.41 2096.561 S 2.096 56 12224.97 41% S 12.224.97 A2 Raad..a S­y.nq LS I $ 56.900-00 S 56.900.00 1.00 E 56.900.00 0.001 S 1.00 100% S 5670.00 A3 R-d D,m., , {M,n, &d • S5.000) LS I S 5.500.00 S 5.500,00 0.80 S 4.400.00 0.00 S 0.80 60% S 4.400.00 A4 SPCC Ran L5 i S MO.= S 1,500.00 1.00 $ 1,500.00 0,00 S 1.00 100% $ 1.50000 A5 pmhalm EA 30 S 900.00 5 27,000.00 48.00 $ 43.200-00 0,00 S 48,00 160% S 43.200.00 A6 Type B P, ras (Mn.&d•$10.000) LS I S 14,000.00 S 14,000,00 1.00 S i4,000.00 0.00 S TOO 100% 5 14,000.00 A7 M6,1imuaa LS 1 $ 441,000.00 S 441.000.00 1.00 S 441,000.00 000 $ 1,00 100% $ 441.000.00 AB Pr -, Temp.,.,T,aR,c C-Ira LS I S 116.300.00 S 118,300.00 1.00 $ 118,300.00 0-00 S TOG 100% S 118.30000 A9 TwH,c Cannot Swermsar HR 1300 5 5500 S 82,500.00 98100 S 53.955.00 0,00 S 981.00 65% $ 53355.00 A10 W-6-d P.1-OR-, HR 60 S 10000 $ 6.000.00 66.00 S 6.600.00 0.00 S 66.00 110% 5 6.500.00 All P.d.smon T,.KF Comic: LS 1 $ 12.800.00 S 12.800.00 1.00 S 12.800.00 000 $ TOO 100% 5 12.80000 AI2 Ckpnn and Grubb,ng ACRE 1,4 S 36.200.00 5 50,680.00 0.55 $ 19,910.00 0-00 $ 0.55 39% S 19.91000 Ali RoadsideO-p EST I S 30.000,00 $ 30,000.00 6479.68 S 6.479,68 O.GO $ 6479.98 22% S 6,479.138 A14 R.moml al S.­,­ and Obn,ua,an LS 1 $ 37,00000 S 37.000-00 1.00 S 37.000.00 0.00 $ 1.00 100% $ 37. 00.00 A15 Sow C.,nm LF 1540 $ 3,00 S 4.629.00 549W $ 1,647.00 0.00 $ 549.00 35% S 1.64700 A16 R.mar,na Cement Coat, S,d,-Ik SY _ 2590 S 11.00 S 28,490.00 2027.50 S 27.30250 0.00 f 2027.50 78% S 22.302.50 AW P-N A.F.a, Cone. Sde..oh Sv 200 S 6,00 S 1,20000 170-50 S 72300 0.00 E 12050 60% $ 723.00 A18 PI C.-Ic-. Curbandc;,n.r LF 3,090 S 6.00 S 18.460.00 2245.00 S 13.470.00 000 S 2245,00 73% 5 13.470,00 A19 Re.,a­C-1 Canc. Cu,6 LF 1020 S 6.00 5 6,120.()0 956.00 5 h, 15600 0.00 $ 956-00 94% ' 5.73600 A20 R.mow A h.I,Caa Po,ern.m SY 10790 S 10.00 S 107,900.00 9790.60 5 97.90600 0.00 $ 9790,66 91% S 97,906,00 A21 Raadwa Excavouon lncl. Ho„1 CY 3.40C S 45.25 $ 157,25000 3400,00 S 157.25000 0.00 $ 3400.00 10014 $ 157,250.00 A22 G-el Do-lml. Had TON I,TOG S 2200. S 24100.00 91.30 $ 2,008.50 0.00 $ 91.30 8% $ 2.008.60 A23 Gushed Sudan Top C- TON 2.000 5 3625 $ 72,500.00 230279 $ 83476,14 0.00 $ 230279 115% S 8.-476.14 A24 HMACI. 1121n. PG64.22 TON 7600 S 90-00 $ 144,0D0.00 1529.47 E 137.652.30 0.00 S 1529.47 96% S i37 652.30 A25 HMA6 App.aach CI. V2 k PG 64-22 TON 60 S 15C.00 S 9,000.00 39.65 $ 5,947.50 0.00 $ 39.65 66% $ 5.94750 A25 A phah Cml R,c.Ad semen, CALC I S 4,370.00 S 4,37000 365.68 $ 365.59 000 $ 365,68 8% S 365.68 A27 Plan,n &rum-,Pwemem SY 230 E 30.00 S 6,900.00 540.00 S 16.200,00 0.00 S 540.00 255% S 16,20000 A28 C.m.m Cone Povemam SY 1340 $ 81.25 $ 108.675.00 1441.80 S 07,146.25 0.00 S 1441.80 106% $ 117.146.25 A29 Inlet Prmea,un FA 61 S 80.D0 S 4,B80,00 40D0 $ 3,200,Go 000 S 40.00 66% $ 3,20000 A30 S,1r Fence LF TT60 S 5.25 5 6,090,00 1232.00 $ 6,468.00 000 S 1232.00 106% $ 6,468,00 A31 H.W.bd, Fence LF 3700 S 3,25 S 12.025.00 3858.DO S 12,538.50 0,00 S 3858.DO 104% S 12.538.50 AK 6os�on/Worn Pa¢u„mC-I,.J E57 I S 100.00000 $ T00.000.00 6287648 S 62.876.48 0.00 S 62576,48 63% $ 62.87648 A33 Seed,na. Fe,rd,n ,and Mulehm SV 8310 S 115 $ 9.556.50 2980.30 S 342735 0.00 S 298030 36% S 3.42735 A34 Rom Sckcbon Frax,nw Amenrono/Autumn Purple Ash {3'CAL) EA 16 $ 560.00 S 8.960.00 16.00 S 8,960-00 0,00 S I6.00 100% $ 8,960.00 A35 PIon1$.Iecl,onA-G*iseum/Po.rbark Maple{I.FCAD EA ) $ 25000 $ 250-00 1.00 S 250.00 0.00 S 1.00 100% $ 250,00 A36 Fl-Sek i-Fo,hmgaleGardem,IN- kA,rD-4Boale&u,h(5GAL) EA 24 S 32.50 S 780.00 24.00 S 780.00 ODO S 24.00 100% $ 780-00 A37 Rom SeI.-Mahon,o Repen,/Crcepn M.h-(2 GAL) EA 36 $ 1725 $ 655.50 38.00 S 655.50 0.00 S 38.00 100% $ 655.50 AM PI-I5.1-1-Vocc,n,um 0.mum/Everrem H,.ddJ , 12 GAL) FA 35 $ 185: S 647.50 35.00 S 647.50 0.00 S 35.00 100% S 647.50 A34 Ram Selec,ux, Vac'-Owrum/Em r.en H,xldebn,y(5 GAL) EA IB $ 30.25 $ 54450 18.00 $ 544.50 0.00 $ 18.00 100% S 544.50 A40 Pt..,Selw-R..G mnocar o/D-,fNah.R..(2GAL) EA 33 S 14,00 $ 462.06 35.00 S 490.00 D.aG S 35-QO 106% S 490-00 A41 Ram S.IWa. Hoh, -., Dncola, / O-n,pray (2 GAL) EA 22 f 15.25 S 335.50 2200, S 335.50 0.00 S 22.00 100% $ 335.50 442 Ram S.lw-A.. halm DC/Pearl Ev Id ,,.n {2GAL) EA 114 E 23.75 S 2,707.50 118.00 S 2.802.50 0.00 E 118.00 104% S 2,802.50 A43 Rum Selecron Gouhhena 5hallpo/Sala1{2GAL) EA 16 S 17.25 1 $ 276.00 1 16,00 $ 276.00 0.00 $ 1 15.00 100% $ 276,00 Progrcsr Paymen7 P 2f C ro#Da+r.- 6/302018 Progress Payment Details PERTEET Nksov 505 F.% A. 5 5-,, 5C0. S.enl.. WA 961041 P206436 05T5 Convocr.d: P,eyieus Towale Doren Thir Eai-re- Total,. Dar.: Lam N.. Docdpaon U„as Q,y. Unie Pc. Canf+aered Amwnr Pr.vio,,. Qumriry re Dm e186.00 Prer:am Taal A-, T. Dan Q-tuy Thl, E.dnwr• A-.., Thi. Enimora. Q.... iry ro D.I. Per...: Campl.m Total Amount To Oar. A44 Plain 5elechon PIead-A r,drnum/ W..tern &ackenfe,n 0 GAL) EA 185 $ 25.0G S 4.650,00 S 4.650.00 0-00 f 186.00 100% $ 4,650.00 A45 PlontSele t-Amtoaaph o.0-Ury/3Gnn,kinn,ck(IGAL) EA 900 S 8,75 $ 7,875.00 1120.00 S 9,800.00 0.00 S 1120.00 124% S 9.800-00 A45 Plain 5elecuon Fro win C),damf.../Caasr S,,-b.,, II GAL) EA 800 S 6.75 S 7.000.00 920.00 S 8,050.00 0.00 S 920.00 115% S 8.050.00 A47 Roor Ban.., LF 170 S 8.00 $ 1,36D.DO 170.00 $ 1,360.00 0.00 $ 170.00 100% S 1,350.00 A48 Topw17 A CY 550 S 3575 S 19.662-50 38950 S 13.924.63 0-00 S 39950 71% $ 13,924.63 A49 Borer u Wo dChip Much CY 120 S 48.75 $ 5.850.00 65.10 S 3.173.63 0.00 S 5510 54% S 3173.63 A50 Ro ", R.srwm,en EST 1 S 40,000.OU $ 40,000.00 3771.55 S 3,771,55 0.00 S 3771,55 9% s 3.771.55 A51 Sw- LS 1 S 55,000,00 $ 55,000.00 L00 $ 55,000.00 0.00 $ I.CO 100% $ 55,000.00 A52 Cement Cone. T,afhc Cw6 and Guns, LF 2,050 % 25.5C $ 52,275.00 1881,00 $ 47.965,50 0-00 S 1581-00 92% $ 47.965.50 A53 Think.-d C.ra.at Cmc.Cu+b and G-, LF 1000 S 31,00 S 31.000.00 1260,00 S 39.060.00 0.00 S 1260.00 126% S 39,060-00 A54 C.m.m Cone Pedu,,-Curb LF 60 S 22.50 S 1.350.00 0.00 S 0.00 f 0.D0 0% $ A56 Evnuded Curb LF 110 S 16.25 $ 2,76250 125.00 S 2,03125 000 $ 12500 74% S 2,031.25 A56 Cement Canc.V.k Carb LF 270 $ 2350 S 6,34500 281 00 S 6,60350 0.00 S 28100 104% $ 6,603.50 A57 Cement Corcreie 0drewoy Ent.ano. TypeUB SY 610 S 45,00 S 27.450.00 632.30 $ 28.45550 000 f 632.30 104% S 28.453.50 A58 Recusr Sloped M-u ble Co.b LF 20 $ 60,00 f 1,200.00 000 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 016 S A59 Precasr Cemem C-. Whrel 51op EA 10 $ 155,00 5 1,650.00 10,00 S 1,650.00 0.00 S 10.00 100% $ 1,650.00 AGO Ra,srd Pov.menr M4 ke, Type1 MUND 0.5 $ 1100-00 S 550.00 0.50 $ 550.00 0.00 S _ 0.50 100% 1 550-00 A61 Rand Pov.mm, Maker Type 2 HUNP 0.1 $ 1.62500 S 162.50 010 S 162.50 000 S 010 100% s 162.50 A62 MPnamenr Core and Cover EA II s 1.625.00 5 17,875.00 1100 S 17,87500 0.00 S IIAO 100% S 17,87500 A63 Ad.,, E-I. M.,-, Case and Cove: EA 1 $ 52500 S 525.00 0001 S 0.00 $ 0.00 0% $ A64 Cement CancSid. Ik 5Y 17130 $ 40.50 S 72.090,00 1716.00 S 69498.00 0.00 S 1716.00 96% S 69.498,00 A65 Monol4h,c Cement Conc-Cwb.Gunrr. and Sde.,,o1k LF 750 $ 50.00 5 43,500.00 742.50 $ 43,065.00 0.00 S 742.50 99% s 43.06500 A66 Crmen, Cone, Curb Ramp Type Pe,p-d-w.,A SY 15 $ 115.00 S 1.725,00 21.10 S 2,42650 0.00 $ 2110 141% S 2.426.50 A67 Doecfobk W.,n,nq Su:{ace SF 440 $ 4B 75 S 71,450.00 462-00 S 22.522,50 0-00 S 462-00 105% 5 22522-50 A68 1nu,runahon Sy.tr+n LS I $ 297.60000 $ 297.600.00 100 S 297,600.00 000 S 1-00 100% S 297,600.00 A69 ROa ,. rm,nare LS 1 $ 4,500.00 S 4,500.00 0.00 S 0.00 S 000 0% 5 A70 T,alk S. ,wl Sriern Madfi o-n,F{uum roe Are. NE L5 1 $ 22,000.00 S 22,000,00 100 $ 22,000,00 0.00 $ 1.00 100% $ 22,000,00 A71 T,oRc Sr not stem Mad,f,cmloa, NE 101h51 LS I $ 22,000.00 S 22,000,00 ICQ S 22,000,00 000 $ 1.00 100% $ 227000 A72 Imneannen5,f-.Cam ter. L5 I $ 48.600.00 S 48,600,00 1.00 f 48.600,00 0.00 $ 1.00 100% S 48.600,00 A73 p­­t 5.9-q LS I S 15.500.00 $ 15.50000 1.00 $ 15,500,00 000 S wol 100% $ 15,500.00 A74 Pla.,,c 1- LF 680 S 2,25 1 1,530,00 637.00 $ 1,433.25 0.00 $ 537.00 94% S 1,43325 A75 RI.., C,os.valk L,na SF 970 $ 5,25 S 5.092-50 758-00 S 4137,00 0.00 S 738.00 51% $ 4,137-00 A76 Plaint Acc-Pa,6 Space Symbol EA 3 S 155.00 5 46500 3.00 S 46-CD ^0, S '71 00`> S 4550. corar,,,e vpo.ed g+egme rrotment 4 16.0000 2.20 Schedul 81 PI and Abandon Ex,st,ng Pie EA 32 S 260.00 S 8.320.00 a2.00 $ 21,320.00 0.00 f 82.00 256% s 21.320,00 92 Omdr hon Rw F« Watp Mn,n, CI.52,121n-Rom_rnh Pot op. lrid„d.N Revia-n LF 2350 s 88.00 $ 206,B00.00 2324.00 S 204,512.CO 0.00 S 2324.00 99% S 204,512,00 83 Sharma O, E.rra Er -.-Trench LS 1 z 3,000.00 S 3.000.00 1.00 $ 5.00000 O.OD $ 1.00 100% $ 3,000.00 B4 81-01I A.u,. bly.2-,nth EA 5 1,725.00 $ 8.625.00 SOO S 8.625.00 000 S 5.00 100% S 8,625,00 65 Ba„k Run G,orel Fa Leach B-0.11 TON - 10,00 S 28.000.00 134345 f 13.434.50 0.00 S 1343-45 48% $ 15.434-50 B6 Conn«non Ta 6a.hnq Waee, h&n EA i- i425,00 S 16.975.00 7.00 $ 16,975.00 0,00 S 7.00 100% S 16.975.00 B7 R.1-1 n.144-hRV.l-111, DCVAio, KCLS l,6,oryond Wafer Moos L5 I s 2,400.00 S 2.400.00 1.00 $ 2,40000 0,00 $ 1.00 100% $ 2,400.00 08 Cana... Th,wr Dockin and D-d-Mon A,-h., BI.,k-I CY 60 $ 410,00 $ 24600.00 28.50 $ 8 % 11,68500 GmeVala 121n ( 2 460 000 45.675.00B9 Progress Foyment A' 21 Cmel7Darr- 6/302018 Progress Payment Details PERTEET 505 F46 A.. S SMr.300, 5.a4e, WA.9A10A I P 206 aM 0515 Convoc+od: Pmv m7ptpl rp Dare: This Estimnre: To+alra Darr: Item No. D....... Vmn Qrr- U., Pdc. Con,recmd ".-I P--Q... r,ty rc bo, r P.e..o,n T-I Amount Ta Darn, Quremy TN, E.nmree A-, TN. 6xmpte: Qurnu,y n Dot. Pun.. Complete T... I AmoY n, To bm BIC Adjw E.,- V.6e B.. EA 9 $ 42500 S 3A25.00 14.00 S 5,950.00 0.00 $ 1400 156% $ 5.950.00 BII h6,,duol P,enme Rrduo-q V.I-lkn Dmm. En 7 $ 675,00 S 4.725.00 700 $ 4.72500 0.00 S 7.00 10011; S 4,725.00 612 Resrr+,nq E.an Hyd.am EA - 1.500,00 S 1500.00 100 S 15MOO 0.00 S 1.00 100X S 1,800.00 813 Hyd,wase.,.hly !A- 4,950.00 S 4455000 9.00 S 44.550,00 0.00 S 9.00 100% S 44,55000 BI4 I Rraw.e And Sp1„pge Hyd,pnr EA 50000 S 4.000.00 5.00 S 2,500,00 000 S 500 63% S 2.500.00 BI5 errce SConn.cean,l ln. D.-En - 1,775-00 E 14.200,00 7.00 S 12.425,00 000 S TOO 88% S 12,425.00 Schaduk C--San110 Sewerlmp.ovemrnu 5 3,300,00 2.00 $ 2.200.00 Q-1zM .I."1:^a �'-" �'I...dr !'A 1.100.00 0.00 S 2,00 67% S 2200.00 C2 4lonhole 4811,. U.- Type l EA i6 i 4,SO0 00 E 75,800,00 i6.00 S 76,800.00 0.00 S 15.00 100% S 76.800.00 C3 V-F,.Ie 60 4,. D- Ty,, t a EA 2 $ 12.500.00 E 25.000.00 2.00 S 25,000-00 000 S 2.00 100% S 25.000.00 C4 Manhole 601n. Gam -Type I Saddle EA I 5 10.500.00 S 10,500.00 I.00 $ 10.50000 000 S 1.00 IDO% S 10500.00 C5 Ma�l,ote Addnw+el M481n. Dwm. Type LF I3 225.00 c- 2.925-00 1C.00 S 2.25C.00 0.00 S 1000 T7% S 2250.00 C6 Manhrlr Adi:,.-1 Fkgh, 601n. D,am. T 1 D,op LF S 30000 S 2100-00 4.50 S I,350.00 0,00 S 4.50 64% S 1,350.00 C7 Ad,uet Mpahalr EA $ 52500 S 525.00 0.00 $ 0.00 S 0,00 0% b CB Ab.M- F.w..g Manhole EA IO S 875.00 11S 8,750.00 7.00 E 6,125.00 0,00 S 7,00 70Pn S 6,125.00 C9 C-r,rn ry Sonuo,ys-, 51-1 ,e EA 5 S 875.00 $ 4,375-00 4.00 $ 3,500.00 0.00 $ 4.00 a0% 5 3.500.00 C10 R and Ak-.d-E.vs P.- EA 34 $ 225.00 S 7.650.00 87.00 S 19,57500 0-00 S 87.00 E 19,575.00 Cii Shw,nq a Exra Exca.mwn Gan B 9° 21200 S 0.10 S 2.120.00 20215.00 S 2,02i 60 Goo S 20216.00 2,021.50 C12 Bank Rio G-46 Trench 8odh11 TO% 3900 S 1000 39.000.00 3865.22 S 38.652.20 0.00 S 366522 599: i 38.65220 C3 PVCSa-aa, Sr..e, Ppre€n.Dam. LF 130 $ 11400 14.82000 14600 S 16.644.00 0.00 S 146-00 112% S 16,644,00 C14 PVC So.,,,n,v Scwa Rpc 12!,, Oam '7'0 S 95,00 15?.y.EO CO 171300 152.M00 D00 S 171300 100°5 5 162.735.OD 550.00 7 :00 00 0 00 E 400 1001, E 2.200,00 Schedul. D-51.-w lm ro vemen,( _ _ 01 Remwm D..... ,_ EA 375.CO _ - - 000 5 19.00 IC5`5 S 7,125,00 1)2 Cf--,8k M., EA -00.00 C,- S 000 S 6.00 '�CO`i 5 3,000.00 DS Car ,ed Pd h r5ram 5- P,pe 81n, a- LF 100 E 68.00 S 6,800.00 254,00 S 17,272.00 0.00 S 254.00 254% S 17,272-00 D4 Sched.I.A Sram Sewer Rpr B ln. I)- LF 160 S 56.00 S 8,960,00 0-00 S 0.00 S 0.00 0% S D5 Schrd.4A Sram 5-Rpe121. D.- LF 490 5 61.00 c 29.090-00 461.00 S 28,121.00 0.00 S 461.00 94% $ 25,121.00 06 5ched.4A5rorm Sewer Rp,181n. Oam- LF 1440 E 97.00 S 139.600,00 1423.00 S 136,031.00 0.00 S 1423.00 99% $ 138,031.00 D7 Schcd.IeAS,-5-Rpe 241.. Dam. LF 120 S 138.00 S 161560,00 120-00 $ 16360.00 0.00 S 120.00 100% $ 16.550-00 D8 H= h,Dror<y NwIhykne (HDPE) Rpe 24 In. Qom. LF 180 S 17600 31.690-00 185.00 S 32.560.00 0M $ 185.00 103% S 32,550.00 D9 Bonk Run Gp He Trench Baeki.J TON 2870 $ 1000 E 28.700.00 2702.02 S 27.02020 27.55 $ 27550 2729,57 95% S 27,295.70 D10 Aba.,don E.,eu Manhoe EA 2 S 900.00 S 1.800.00 3.00 S 2.70000 0.00 S 300 150% $ 2,700-00 D1l Ad,.,, Cmch Ba" FA 14 5 525,00 S 7,350.00 700 S 3.675.00 0.00 S 7,00 50% S 3.675.00 D12 Cmch B.-T I EA 12 S 1,225,00 $ 14,70000 11.00 S 15.415.00 0.00 $ 11,00 92% S 15,475.00 D13 Cmch B- Type IL EA 5 i 1,425,00 $ 7.125.00 500 5 7,125.00 0-00 $ 5.00 100% S 7,125.00 D14 CatnhBp•mT 2481n.p-- EA 24 4,000,00 S 96,000.00 27t .+ E 88.00000 1.00 S 4.000.00 23,0C 96% $ 92.000-00 DI5 C--,-+ Ou,-Sxres,we EA 7 825.00 S 5,775.00 4,125.00 0.00 S 500 71% S 4,125.00 DIG SaSd Carch Born Ud and Frame "A 1 500.00 S 60000 600.00 0.00 $ 1.00 100%1 S 600.00 017 Broremnon Fdt,ctt-5tandord Um, 4 F,,.4 F- EA -S 1.3.900-00 S 135.200.00 8.OD 5 135200.00 0.00 $ 8.00 100% 5 135.200.00 U18 &aesrnr,pn Fdnaeon S+andp,d U-4 Fe. 6 F- En 19,400,00 S 19,400.00 1.00' S 19,400.00 000 S 1.00 IGO%I S 19400.00 0I4 Shwnnq., Evua E,cawouan Clau B 5F 010 7 I'm 00 1 S-'Rh c,^ F 1.381,05 0.00 $ 13810.50 76%1 S 1381.05 220 N. and Ab0ndo-L-unq Rpe LA 350.00 :' 14,350,00 I':I],! ;. 46.900.00 0.00 $ 134,00 327%1 S 46.900.00 Schedule E--U11(I y Under ,d..dI.lm rovemen+. Progress Payment 0 21 C ro&[w,: 6502018 Progress Payment Details pERTEET SOS hhh Am S Srerv300, 5--- 11 'AiO4 I P7064MMIS Commend: Pmv -Toro! ro Dine: This E,1-1.: Talal to Dofe: hem No. D-u pfion Unhs Q1y. Uri, Pnce Conlracled Amount P.ma�s Qua.riy ro acre P.es+osn T-it, awr To iinrv- Qao MY Th.. E.+,...a,e Ate, Thar E+rimarr. Qua>•f+ry ro Darr pacrnl Camplv+a Tarel Amain+ T. Dare El D-cfionol8o"n LF zAa E 165.00 $ 39.600.00 0.00 $ coo $ 0.00 0% $ E2 Bonk Run O,oval for T,cnch B.60 TON 1710 S 26.00 b 44,450.00 2037,55 S 52,975.30 0.00 S 2037.55 119% S 52,975.30 F3 Shann orEmollyd, Leach Erco.onw 5F 11400 S a.1D 5, 1,140.00 550.00 $ 5500 000 $ 550.00 5% S 55.00 E4 Urd,gr Trench Etta - CY 1770 S 137 D0 S 242490.00 2097.80 S 287.398,60 coo S 209780 119% S 267.396,60 E5 Bockl,81o. Sond Dwn, TON 820 S 3-s.50 S 28.290.00 1225.26 S 47.272.T6 0.00 S 1225.28 149% S 42,272.16 E6 C--..-Cardwf 2ln. Dom.-Imldl LF 23C $ 2.00 $ 460.00 160.00 S 320.00 0.00 $ 160.00 70% S 320.00 E7 Comcosr-Candmf4ln.D--lmmll LF 5640 2.50 S 14.100.00 5343.00 $ 13,35750 0.00 $ 5343.00 95% $ 13.357.50 E8 CemuryLink-Candor 4ln. Dram.- Ins,pU LF 3720 2,50 $ 9.30000 755.00 $ 1.91250 -340.a0 S (850,001 425.00 11% $ 1.062.50 E9 PSE-C-dmf 31n. Drom.-Inarod LF 70 2.00 S 14000 120.00 $ 240.00 0.00 S 120.00 171% S 240.00 EIC PSE-Condon 4ln. Dom. Imm11 LF 47B0 2.50 S 11,950.00 4504.00 S 11,260.00 0.00 $ 4504.00 94% 11260.00 Ell PSE-Ca..d-61n_Dmm.-Insrnli LF T550 $ 3.00 $ 4.650.00 1200,00 S 3.600001 0.00 S 1200.00 77% S 3,600-00 Ei2 Ca>•cosr-p,ecos+Vorrh-Ins+all EA 10 $ "00000 $ 20.000.00 10.00 S 20.000.00 0.00 S 10.00 100% S 2C.000.00 E13 Cenrur ink-Recosr Vouh=Ins10 EA 7 $ 2,000,00 S 14.000.00 1.00 S 2.000001 0.00 S 1.00 14% S 2,000.a0 E14 I F5E-Preease Vauh-immll SA 8 S 3,000.00 $ 24.000.ae 8,00 S 24000,00 0.00 $ Ell 100�6 $ 24,000,00 =15 P$E ihr,•�i•,•ir"-srnll EA $ 1,075.00 $ 1,075.00 1.00 $ 1,075.00 000 S 1.00 1004o S 1.07500 Schcd..:. F-Po,11a„ - n5 s m. Ccmcic*c 142,800.00 S 142.800.00 F00 S 142900VZ) CL0 c I col 10C% c 142.600.00 =•(p r) -- ore-(Oedurnanl 2,040,28 5 2.04028 2040.28 5 2.04028 0.00 S 2040.28 1005 S 2.040.28 •.W'-S ES z ,040.29 S (2.040,28} -2040.28 S (2.040,28) 0.00 $ •2040.28 IQO% 5 {2,04027 A6B W) E5T I d6.412.00 S 86412,00 86412.00 S 06,412.00 0.00 S 86412.00 100% $ 86,412.00 A68 Illurnmofwn Sysfem(Oeduceon) EST d 66,412.00 S (86,41200} .86412.00 S (86,412.00) 0.00 $ .8641200 100% $ (85.4T2.00) A69 Relocnre L--a (%rmem) EST 1 150.00 S 150.00 150-00 $ 30.00 0.00 $ 150.00 100% S 150.00 A69 Relocore Lommmre (Dedunlor+} EST A S 150.00 $ (150,06) 1150.00 S (150.001 0.00 S .150.00 100% $ (150.00) A72 Imerconnecl Sysrem,Complere(Paymem) EST I S 2.455.20 S 2.455.20 245520 S 2,455.20 0.00 S 2455.20 100% S 2.495. 00 A72 !--cornet+ sam. Compkre lDeducuon) 85T -I 2.455.20 S (2.455.201 .2455.20 $ (2,455.20) 000 S -2455.20 100% S 12455.20) 82 Ducnle 1- Ppe For Wottr Mwe. C1. 52.12 kr. Dom,. enh .op.lxluding Re.nwn, EST I - 35,731.T4 $ 35,731.14 35731 T4 S 35.731.14 000 S 35731.14 100% b 35,731.14 82 Dw,* Iron Pr. Fin W.I., Mom, CI.52,12 hr. Dam., vmh P op, Including Re.r .- EST -I $ 35.73114 S (35,7313A) -35731.14 $ (35,731.14) 0.00 b .35731,14 100% $ (35.731.14) 84 BI-Off Aaem61y, 2-mc+,(Po mere) EST 1 $ 1.581,99 S 1.581.99 1581.99 S 1,591.99 0.00 $ 15B1.99 100% $ 1,581. 99 84 Blow-011 Assemkdy, 2-mch(Dedue,on) EST .1 S 1,581,99 S (1,5BI.991 -15BI99 $ (158199) 0.00 S -15B1.99 100% S (1,581.99) 86 C-r,an To E-n Winer Mom (Po +) EST I S 7.222.96 $ 7222-96 7222 95 S 7.222.96 0.00 $ 7222.96 100% $ 7,222.95 B6 Con.+ccrwn Ta EssnngWorer Morn lOeducrwn] EST 4 $ 7222.96 S (7.222.96) -71:.' - (7222.96) 0-00 S .7222.96 100% $ (7222.96) 07 Rulxmr000l4.1-+PN,1-L+ch DCVAFm KCkSLAx,, and Worn Mnns( r) EST 1 S 71T50 S 711.50 71i.'. 711.50 0.00 $ 711,50 100% S 711.50 B7 R,I-.ionuf4-Inch PIV,I4ech DCVAFor KCL5U...,ypnd Wora Merms(Dedot,-: EST .1 7kf,50 $ (711.50) .78.5C = (111.50) 0.00 S -711,50 100% S (711.50) B8 Corcrefr Sh,u.+B«kr and Dmd Mon Anchor B«kr (Poy*nem) EST 1 51759 $ 517.59 517.59 's W.59 0.00 $ 51759 100% S 517.59 88 EST 4 517.59 S (517.59) -517.59 b (517.59) 0.00 $ -517.59 100% S (517.59) B9 Gole Valva 121n, (Poymerr) EST 1 21,52543 S 21,523.43 21523.45 S 21.523.43 0.00 $ 2552343 100% $ 2L52343 B9 Gole Vole 12 in,(0edvcreon} EST 21,523,43 S (21,523.43) .2152343 $ (21.523.43) 0-00 $ -21523,43 100% S (21.523.43) BII krdnmfuol Pleuu.e RedUd V6e.F1n. Dom. (Paymero EST 2.19510 S 7,18510 2185.10 S 2.185,10 0.00 S 218530 100% S 2,T95.10 B11 k.dmdunl Ressu,e Redocr Vat-T In. Dom. (Dedi honl EST 2.185.10 S (2.185,10) -2IB5.10 b (2,185.10) 0.00 S -2185.10 100% 5 Q.T85.10) B12 ReserI r Exrsrr Hydmm (Pa -f) EST 1 67.50 S 6750 57.50 S 6750 O.CO S 57-50 100% S 67.50 B12 Reren, Exnlrn H -,(Dedun,oe) EST -1 67.50 $ (6750) -5750 S (67501 0.00 $ -67.50 100% S E67.50) 013 Hyd-t Assemhly(Poymmr) EST I 5 4,506,34 S 4,608.34 4608,34 S 4,608.34 0.00 $ 4608.34 100% S A,60B.34 Bli 1 Hydronr Assembly lDrducfron) EST - r:G:154 S (4,608. 54) -460834 S (4.6C8.54) 0.00 % 1 .4508.34 100% $ (4,608.34j Progress Poy eor M 21 C rnNpare: 6/302018 Progress Payment Details PERTEET 505F,Ah Ax 5 5-500, S. , WA981041 P7064Ma515 Cantrvued� Prnwus Tvral ro D.,,- Thi, F„imer.: Tmv1 w D.te: Item N.. Dru,lp,i.n Uy+, Qly. UNI Pnce Cw, c«d/ au„r Predau, Quon,iry ,o Der. N.N.- Tmal A-, T. Odle: Q-i,y Thl, E,n - Amon, Thi, Eelima,e: Quami,y to Dale P,r-, Cornpk,e Tarel A..-, T.D.I. B15 Se,r,ce Conaec,mn, 11.. Orvm.{ menr) EST 1 $ 4,48i44 $ 448144 4481.44 $ 4.481,44 Goo S 448144 100% $ 4,481 44 BIB S-cc Connecuvn, I In. Dom,(Ded--) EST 1 $ 4481,44 S (4,481A4) .4481.44 S (4.48144) 0,00 $ -448144 600°* : {4,4BI 44} C3 Mco)To1e601n_D,om. Type!Drop lPv nr1 EST I S 492.78 S 492.78 492.78 S 492.78 0.00 S 492.7B 100% $ 492,78 C3 M.M.1, 6O in D,- Type l D,op EST I S 492.78 S (492,78) -492.78 S (492.78) 0.00 S -492.78 100% $ (492.7B} - S-,Cl--., [Pvymrnrl EST S 23B.90 $ 238.90 238.90 $ 238-90 coo S 23890 100% £ 238.90 = 5-. Ckvrww(Ded-,-) F57 $ 23890 S (238-90) -238,90 $ (238-9W 0.00 $ -238.90 T00% $ (238.90) 017 &c,e,eneon Fdrraf,on S,vndo,d Une4F,..4F,.(Pv,m.,) E57 S 70.800.00 $ 70.000.00 70B00.00 $ 70.800.00 0.00 S 70800.00 t00% $ 70.600.00 D17 Smre,enevnF,Irmr,on 5wne.,d V.., 4 F,,. 4 Fr.(peduu,on) EST S 70,800.00 $ (70,600.00) -70600.00 $ (70,800.00) 0.00 $ .70800.00 T00% $ (70,800.00} Dt8 3-e-ian FJrror,on S+o-dv,d Urn, 4 F,..6 F,. (P.,m 0 EST 13,300,00 $ 13,300.00 13300.00 $ 13,500.00 0.00 $ 13300 00 100% S 13,300.00 DI8 S-1-I- Fdl,vnvn 51-b,d Um, 4 Fr..6 F,. (04d�xuon7 E57 13,300 00 $ (13.300.00) -13300.00 S (13,300.00) 0.00 S -133052021 0.00 100% S (13.300,00) ES' ,. i 88.2BT.51 8RE 8EE 88.287.51 0.00 S 8828..51 100% $ 88.28751F FI 8B,2B751 S , -8828751 F00Xa.2 f {B8,7B7-5I} PROJECT TOTALS WITHOUT CHANGE ORDERS Sched,l.A S 2,611,850.04 1 S 2,398,46436 S 2,096,56 91.91% $ 2,400,560.94 Schedule B $ 423720,00 $ 399.275.51 S 94.23% S 399.276.50 Sakr 7o. tT 959.(W fC-m,*rdad$>rdBil76 m33147) S 29,091.13 j 29.D9201 S 100.003' $ 29,092.01 Sao, To. nY95%(Work Cnmprered8•Y 16re.'L3LllaurPoymn,.,.�.,de o. rromk,redalrel $ J (5 M.42 S Nit $ 15772.47 SNef 7n.�100.5 (Wale Crnykreda8er 4/i071 S 11,749.7fi f 1558071 $ 130.901 $ 15380.71 ScheduleC $ 362,515,00 $ 369.552.80 S - 101.94% S 369552.80 Sokr Ta.M95%(Work Covrp/efed vrrdPoo,d&276)o-1'107) $ 23,046.55 $ 13.04736 $ too 001% $ 2304736 Svkr To.0951(Work Coaplrr.d8'L'16ry 33747b.t., enrmode wrranslrrrrdolnl f f (15500 S - WA S (55501 Sale, T. M10 D.4(ty Ac-w4,rednhw 4'1i17) F 11,992.M f 15,,05,951 $ - 10898% S 13.06661 Sch.dul.0 S 576J3000 S 592.270.25 5 4.275.50 103.54% S 596.545.75 56cdulcE S 455,65500 $ 460.467.06 S (95000) 10087°. $ 459.617.06 So1e,T,C954 lwortCn,plerdardPoid&1,26+o3%3b,17) S 14.798.41 f 18.601.f0 5 - 12570.% S 76-501.10 flu T.0 9.5.R lWwk Complered8rL16ra3/3)i77b,upo)vnrnr mode ar rrnnsln,rclaknl S - S (30020) S - NIA $ 770020 5n10,To. 61100$(Work C.,91, edafw 47b17) S 25.98600 f 76782.61 5 (85170) 10274% $ 26,697.61 Schcd„ Ic F $ 142.800-00 S 142.820.00 S 100-00% S 142.800.00 Sak,To.hr954&vak ComplerrdondPod&11Kto.V5J } 5 1.116.48 S 111639 S - 99.999 S 1,11L1,139 SA,, S {8,3B732i S NA $ (8,387.32 Sale, F.. 4P 10.0%(W IC Arrednher4277) S 13,104,76 Is 219.060 1 16737% $ 21.91360 Total &dllemWork SSched.A+B+GD.E+F) S 4,572.670.00 Sde, Tn. GP95&"� kC,urlvkrrdw+dP,rdB?/I6 ra331/7T1 S 68,052.55 -Soler Ta.Ar9.547Wa.k Cwrpkr.d8�,76 ry 33L776wpvymenrmadrarmnrlrnedaNerJ S SWm Tar&10.0.b(W k C..Wredalter 411,77) S 6285252 Tara1 S 4,703.555.07 $ 4.703,555.07 11 S 4.362.831.00 $ 5.522.06 5 7( 856 86 j S 714874-05 S 5 77,,16553 S (8500 S 4.497.038.44 S 5.437,06 5 :,497,038.44 $ 5,437.06 95.53% S 4,36$353,06 105.59% $ 7185685 eDIV/D! $ (W.81495 1226834 S 77.08053 95.7244 S 4.502,475.50 $ 4,502,475.50 Progress Payment ♦ C rall0rr- 21 6y30RO18 �,R = r pERTEET Progress Payment Details Canrracred: pl"W-Tool re Dore: Th„ E4r�mme- A5 Fdrh A.. 5 $urr 300. Sear. WA, 9W4 r P206 436 P`i15 Torel ro Dmr: em No. oem,p,.o.. Un�n QW Unit P,�ee eom.op�d Amo��r Previsw, Quarrriry ra Dar, Preriaus imol Amor,nr T. Onm. Qummry Tls. EaEmore Amam+Thlr Ev+mau: Qr,onray.o Dare Pncenr Camplere T.I.IAmmm Te Dore Change Order 41 (E.rcwrdl �' -'' - -- - L�� 47 -G:. LI? '3 - - _ 52°., 5016158 C-ge O,dv X2 (E-W.d) Raad..ar Ea0wreo„lrel. Haul C, SE] :52i 5 -- J Z. _- 0.00 s 650.00 3.2.50 -C25.52 '. ��: A7? 'ZoA1. oy E.ccro,�an lnd-Na�iQ �am.rr ..,.-- :=-o.n�x, A-�.,.. '-v -•- - =535 5 ",i'76 .7p nc _ ' >-',,.2�.5 0.00 S I678.40 , A15 03 Rr=-a-a Cemm,r C:-Sd-lk 5v :0 5 11.00 S 110,00 1000 $ I1000 0,00 s 10,00 100% $ 110,00 Abe 03 Cement Comic. Sidewnik- f0 S 40.50 S 405,00 10.00 S 405.00 0,00 S 10,09 1001A 5 405.00 E203 Bank Run Qr 1tar Trench Backf. I -i 26.00 S (780.00) 0.00 $ 0.00 S 0,00 0% S E405 Urdr,r Trench E...w - CY $ 137.00 $ (4.110-00) 0.06 a 0.00 S 0.00 W. S E503 B-0,0In Sand Drams TOE 34.50 S (345.001 0 u ` 0-00 S 0.00 0% S E503 C-P-Condun21n.1)wm,.Inffo11 LF 2.00 S 20.00 29.00 0.00 s 10,00 100% S 20.00 E7.03 Camcm+-Condoa4k D,om:l.,.H LF - 2.50 S 825.00 3.-. 825.00 0.00 S 330.00 100% S 825,00 E803 Crnwr Un4-Cndorf 41. IN - - nod 2.50 8 (7.925.00) 0.00 $ 0.00 0% S E1005 Candwr 4ln. D,om.-�nsrol3 2.50 S 1,100.00 e�V 0.00 S 440.00 100% s 1,100,00 EM 05 PSE- C-da,r 6la. Qom.-3ro.0 LF 15C 3-00 $ 450-00 1 :. s 45C'. 0.00 s 150.00 100% S 450.00 E1503 C-n ,,Lrnk-'Pr-v V.,lt-I-WH EA 6 _7700 S 02,0O0.00) c S 0-00 $ 0.00 0% $ CO3-E16 TeIc-Condu,r4 ti. D- -Fv,rush LF 252C - $ 11.289.60 2298.00 S 10.29504 340.00 S 1.52320 2678.00 105% S 11,618,24 CO5-E17 Candmf 4ln. Dram,-4esfall LF 2520 5 6.300.00 2298.00 S 5.745,00 340-00 $ E50.00 2638.00 105% S 6.595,00 CO3-f18 Tdreom Prccasr Vavl+Furnish EA 4 8.624.00 5.00 s 10.760A0 0.00 S 5.00 125% S 10,780A0 CO3-EI9 Telecom - Prrcosr Vouh lns,.11 EA 4 s 8,000.00 400 S 6.00000 0.00 s 4.00 T00% $ a000,00 Progress Payment 0 21 C,roIf lu,, 6I30/20i8 Progress Payment Details PERTEET 50SF.MA. SSore300.S,m .WA, 98I04IP206 ♦360SIS r1215 Ppr Fo, W., V,,,,,. C15[,'2,,=�:,-.� ..��,, .-. �, w,,,u. h.d�d,�.o R—,o,',KEST �.��. i B800 S f2,288.M 0.0o S � 000 � 0.00 B915 G." V�, �� 121n, 5 2,175.00 S (6.525=) 0.00 S 000 S 0.00 0% 5 COIbBf7 P--:,p and 0e1ner 12'Cwre Vdres to the C,ryo4 Rensan Shoa S 6.000.00 S 6.000.00 5897.53 S 5.897.83 0.00 S M97.85 96% S 5.897.83 COIS818 Re,..... r �.t vn e[ the Ewen Cmcrew Thmu 81a1, m Hm, an Are NEaM NE I S 1,500.00 S 1.500.00 1204.43 S 1.204 43 0.00 S 1204.43 905 S 1,204.43 CO16B19 Ides+•, �!.e the Can31,cr be —the 2'Elbra Go•5—.-6 the Pr red S 8.000,00 S 8.000.00 7806.67 S 7,006.67 0.00 S 7806.67 98% S 7.806.67 C016-E0 Idr�*',..,-,1Rr,J,, theConfhcr between the AJ—d 1—diLd R"Slo,m Sc„cr Pigeon S 5,0000') Gf00^ coin qq < ;n^c y• ^, �^ r 4009.93 4,009.95 CD16.B21 R^u" 1-.�, -.IC „ c�S,de Sewer thm wo�Domoyed 0�„ny wme, ?Na,n in„nl.m� $ I,E,.:.. 1153,83 N LI53.83 a.P. , ,uecur-I Progress Poy»renr O 21 =� PERTEET � C-ffDve- 6/30/2018 505 FAA A.. 5 Sw,. 300, Swm.. WA 98104I P2054350515 Progress Payment DefoVs Commctrd: P,ev;oas Tao[ to Date: Thls Estrmare: Total ra Dore: P,avlos Q„onrry ro Preaem Toml Arn4aer7o Qaa+rrl+y TNr Peeeen I mvo Oesc.�pr,en Cr„,ir aiy lln'i, Pace Cv�+rocted Amvan r Owe Qote E.nmwe Am��.,r Th. Er„ma•r Q,. n...... Dare CamPlere T-i-1 -T.11- e.ea-J Rcpl­ Bacled So.. loyS-anGer-n.-d Ave NL ES" �,,iJ;]O.g0 $ 15.000.00 14069 rli S 14_vfi'J Sri - I:�•�'r-i. - r_rrc�+r honpcOrda, U&3EIlacssfad)..____...... COIB-A88 Rruake Swveyfo, G+ade RewPaes EST I000.00 I,000 CLP1457.30 5 '"75 S 359`4 ° 3,5B7.fi5 COl8-A89 Resecke Sarver Sw Carfi Rr-, EST 3,000,00 3,000 CO 5 - 0.D0 S `F0.00 W, 2.568.05 C016-A90 Gand the E. v. Asphab 2`- the West Hatf of G emwaod Am NE EST I 1,000.00 5 1.000.00 S 0.00 S 0% S COI&A91 Re rode NE l0,h ST E57 ! - 500.00 $ 500.00 S 4481E 0.00 $ 44813 90% $ 44813 AIS IS Saw Cau,n LP 125 S 3.00 $ 37500 S 22200 0.00 $ 74.00 59% 5 222A0 A2016 Remavin As hall Cana Pavement 5y 500 $ 10.00 S 51000.00 $ 4,57300 0.00 $ 45730 91% $ 4573.00 A5516 Extredrd Cr.rfiLF 7JT 5 1525 5 1,13750 S 1,040.00 0.0.1 t 91`6 5 1,040.00 C CO19-E22 Pra and lm,oll Temoora,y Pak lw Comcmr EST __ __ I 3 3,000.00 5 3000.00 26086E $ 2.608,68 0.00 $ - cF.: 5 2.608.68 C019.E73 Ruse Vaal, Wails ra Ali lastollatwn of Cond,ns w the Supplied Voal,s EST 1 2.000.00 $ 2,000.00 1494.80 S 1.49480 0.00 $ 75-, > 1494.80 C019'_I4 E....,,fa, Added 4"Condmtfmm PVal,o Cdp,wsh EST 1 5 2,000.00 5 2,000,00 144946 $ 1.44946 0.00 $ 1449.46 72P; 5 144946 C019-E25 E.covaie fo, Added 4'Gas Mom Coe w- at Gleenwood Ave NE EST 1 1.000-00 $ 1,000,00 575.70 $ 575.70 0.00 5 57570 58% $ 575.70 ME E26 1-11 Ped-- Acceseand 5.1,s uent3 Remove PSE Poiron the Eris 6ldenf Hann EST I $ 2.000.00 S 2,000,00 T641.03 $ 1.641.03 0-00 S J641,05 62% $ 1.641,03 COt9 E27 A,,.,,PSEm the lnsallwmn ola Cross in,he Gas Mdma Hprnnq+nry Ave NE(Nwth) EST I 5 3.500.00 $ 3,50000 3108.00 $ 3108.OD 0.00 5 3108,00 89% $ 3108.00 PSE�n+he lns+dlox: :C-,,.,he Goa AAama NE IOC.•'' �-d5anse,Loee EST ! 5 2,500.60 5 2.500.00 2107.23 S 2.1072E 0.00 5 2107.23 84% 5 2.107 3 , a .., mom. ^.d H,-. - nk-ae and T, 1' ac me Nl .. a� EST $ 2,50000 $ 2.500,00 2185.74 a 2.185.74 0.00 5 21R574 87'e S 2IS574 • - ..., - S T,500.00 $ 1,500.00 I420-g6 $ I,a2086 0,00 S I42u 85 5 1,420 gS Chon9e Order a20 lE acaredl - 001PA52 0.claca+e E.uu-Pork Frnm E57 $ 2.500,00 $ 2.500.00 2133.23 S 2,133,23 0.00 $ 2153.23 85% S 2.133.2E CO20-A93 Remove RHA Lumnoire Pales, Silt Fence.aed H,gh Vtb,6ry Fence EST S 2,500,00 $ 2.500-00 4851.51 $ 4,851.51 0.00 s 4851.51 194% $ 4,851.51 CO20-A94 Mmaam Esur, Asphalt Adacem to nccLxwyfw Pedes,nan Accessand R-wo EST $ 2.000.00 S 2.000.00 1846.03 S I,848.03 0.00 S 1848.03 92% S 1,848,03 CO20-AS3 Remove pnd Replace S�druul4+hat..,os Danw dMRHA E"ddLn Csen+aLrn,�Can+ro EST 3,000.00 $ 3000-00 270797 5 2.707.97 0.00 S 2707.97 90% S 2,707.97 CO20-A96 Ii and Rerrravr Terns-,,y Asphoh Wolksav A :"h Sale o[Sww Lane EST 3-000,00 S 3,000.00 2776.35 S I,776,35 0.00 $ 2778-35 93% S 2.778.35 C070-A97 Remove Spoils Lehavrr Lam the RHA R-dd,ng Ce-- - EST i 1,500.00 $ 1,500.00 101181 $ 1,013.81 0.00 S IOli81 68% 5 1,013.El CUtO-qyg a - "1:- 11 Temporary rr::"',: Aa- •. 1.000.00 $ 1,000.00 969.77 S 95977 0.00 $ 569 71 97.5 1 969.77 M30 Progress Payment jr 21 Cwal�Darr: fiMt 08 Progress Payment Details 0 ' PERTEET SDS Fd+h A. 5 S., MO. $ee 1 , W A, 98101 I P206436 0515 Commcred: P—i— Taeal ra Dare: This Estimme: T.W to Deft: R.No�. Qunneey ra P.d+or.i 7.r.l Amarmr To QoonNlr Thy. Pam.... Unu. Qry V-11P,+c. C.mr.uedA-- Dora Dou E.rmar< Amo.mThr.E.11-1.: QuannrFroDore Complete To1alAmo—ToDme ORDER TOTALS (EXECUTED . PROPOSED) Schedule A S 529.572.82 $ 545.208.11 S 7.02633 IO4,28% $ 552.23444 Schedule B $ 19,687-00 S 24.242.83 S 123,14% S 24,242.83 Sok.T �95%!1Y iCampJrxdandPa�dB�l'162o331.T7J S S S aLYs,0 S Sakr 1,742.77 S N/A S 1.742.77 Saks 7— 10.0%(W kC—W xdohe. 44,77) S 115000 $ ,58979 S 51-79X S 58979 Sch.d.l. C $ 45,000.00 S 38.837,25 $ 86.31% $ 3B.837.25 Saks F- 95%1Wnk CompkredurrdRs+d8rY16 rp 3/31/771 5 $ fi ap)VAN $ Soler 7.P+95$(Wa1 S S - $ - N/A S Sek. 7s6P70.0.%(Wwk C«nphmdofie.4L77) S $ 388373 S - alJwo, S 5,883.73 ScheduleD $ 5575770 S 39,169.53 $ 289.69 10735% S 39.459.22 Schedule E S 24,605 40 S 82.659,20 S 2,373.20 343-64% $ 85.242 40 5akrTorm95%(WWk (77995/ 5 204.82 $ - -7316.% S 204.82 Sakr tar kF95.%tWwk Compkxd&'L'16ra 3i37R76vrpaynn•.,rmackwrmnskr,rdalrn/ 5 - $ 2,97103 S - WA $ 2, 977 03 Sake T—O'100%NM C—,V,rd.6,4TY) S (2,03078) f 494391 $ ZT732 -Z5513$ S 5,115123 Schedule F S i2.I45.18 $ 12,14518 S - 100.00% S 12,14518 Soler T--4195$(W�l C—,,,rxd—dP-d8,P76ra 3.3117) S - J $ a171V'O.r S - 5okr7rpP9.5%(W.ECo,,,r,'errAB�l'16ro3�31/176arFvy..,rnfmodror nomk.redakrrJ S S S WA f 5.1rs7u.0110.056(714od 1 o.::n1rrcdal-J7,77) S $ 1274.51 $ apru O7 f 1,174 S1 T010l Chon9e0rderW«k(Sched. A+B+C.DE.F1 S 557.967.60 Saks)argP95%(Work CwnplrredandPad8rL76ro 3�SN71 J (27995 Saks 7a=4795!lWor4Canrrd&L76ru 3r31/llbarpvJ-men2madear ranrkrredaFrrl S Saks T-9100%(W11 C—pkledphrr 44,77) S IB8078) Tara[ S 666,805 87 S 666,806.87 11 PROIFCT TOTALS WITH C-HANC;F ORDFR5 S $S 742,472 8SSf 9.628397.232 S 20 47 061. 7580$ ,27 S 992654 $ 758,022.67 $ 9,926.SA 112.60% 5 752.I6L32 •7316% f 204,87 rDN/0! S 4.713.80 •R34,45% S 10,86921 115.17°:, $ 767,94921 5 767,94g.21 Schedule A S 3.141,422 82 S 2.943.672.49 $ 5,i22 a4 94.00% S 2,952,795.38 Schedule B $ 443,407.00 $ 423,519,34 S - 95.51% $ 423.519,33 Saks Tn. gP956fWo4Ca-npl rrdandP ,dBix•76 ra 3�srg7) $ 29091-13 S 29,092.01 S 10000's S 29,092A1 .Saks Tw pP9.56 (Wnk Ca pkxdB�L'16 ra331R76..rpaymenrn arks. rranakrrrda7rml S $ (4,029-65) S - AIA S (4,029.651 .Saks 7r fP1004 f1arari Cansyrxdahn 4.?•77) S 12,89976 S 15:970.50 S 123801, 5 15,97050 Schedule C S 407,515.00 S 408.390.05 S - 100,21% S 408.390.05 54s7.P95.%(Wak C—Wkxdw.dPa+d8'1116 ro 3r31-17) S 2304653 5 25,,047.36 $ 100.00.1. S 24047..36 Saks 7r$A95%(Wwk C'amampJrm/8iY76ro3/3d47bwpoy.»rnraadr o. rranslr.rrda7m/ S (35501) S N,s S f3'5501 Sder Tords1700%(Wark Compkxdalxr 4?r771 ! 11, 992,00 lC.s95234 S r!l364 5 16952.34 Schedule 0 1 $ 612,887201 631,439.78 1 $ 4.56519 i0377A 5 636.004.97 Progress Payment 0 21 =� (7 P E R T E E T b C ra#D0 .. 6/3012018 SOS FrhhJ 3S.r.300.S ".WA 9816a I PIMA MOM Progress Poyment Details Camrac+ed: P—i... T.wl fa Dan: This Eahma+e: Total m D.w N,,iw,r Qr ,,y eo P.e —T—i Amwmr T, Quo ov TNs Pweenr hem No annp+le^ Vr,[n Q1Y. Um. Nk. Camraered Amaanr ame aa+a� E+r�more A -.-,Thy. Eer'1morc: Qm.fii",. 0a�c Complete TelalAmoum To aura Sched,i. E $ 480,460.40 S 543.336.26 5 l.523.20 113.40% $ 544,859.46 Saks 7-0(95%(Wa1 CmpkrednndPuid8.1T6ra 33117) S 14.516..46 S 1d80591 S - 11953% S 1&805.91 Saks Tus95% SCand82761u.3�3L?lrwlp,at,+Krrrnwde wlonslerrrdohn/ $ S 1,67083 5 - ACA f 1,670B3 So<s 7— IO O.b (Wwk C—wkrada&-411,77) 5 1.i 95511 S 31.71651 s 15232 13308% S 3187864 Schedule $ 1549451El $ 154945.18 5 - I IM00%j $ 154.945.18 Saks 7or(3195%(WarlCa.nplecrdam9P�rvd&•L'fbra.�3L771 J 1,71648 5 1.11639 S 99991 S lllfi.39 Saks 7a.ru 95ti FCnr�olered6•L16+p1'31.]76✓rpurmmrnwde or Y.onrknedahnl S S (838731 S - NIAS (BM7..31 S,,+rr 7-0'100%(W-4C—ple.red i, 47,77) $ 73.10476 S 251-18Q S - 176644 S 1314812 ProjectTotnls Wilh Chonge Orders&hed. A+B+C+D+E) $ 5,240,637.60 $ 5.IC5.30310 $ 15.211,28 97.71% 5 5,120,514.38 Sa/eaT OP 954(W F C—pl,rrdandPmi&*76v J31.•17) S 67.T71 fi0 S 72..0b166 S 106-33% S 71,06168 Sutra Tnr09.5.%;(W kr—k+redahw) S S (10,10115r S aDWO! S r10101.15 Sa! 1--9P10. 0%(W I Comakr..folre: 4A47) S 6C9sL74 S 87.797.46 S 151.31 141.97% $ 9794980 Total 5 5,370,361.94 $ 5.255.06111 $ 15.363.60 98.14(1 5 5,270,424.71 5 6,370,3619n $ 5,265,061.11 5 5,363.fip 5 5,270,424.71 AGENDA ITEM # 9. a) CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON, ADOPTING AN AMENDED SECTION 18, ROLLOVER CONTRIBUTIONS, OF THE ADOPTION AGREEMENT CONTAINED WITHIN THE CITY'S 457(b) DEFERRED COMPENSATION PLAN, AND AUTHORIZING THE 457(b) DEFERRED COMPENSATION PLAN COMMITTEE TO AMEND OR UPDATE THE CITY'S 457(b) DEFERRED COMPENSATION PLAN, PROVIDED THAT SUCH AMENDMENTS OR UPDATES DO NOT IMPACT THE CITY'S BUDGET. WHEREAS, Resolution No. 4221 granted the HRRM Administrator the authority to establish and maintain on behalf of the City an Investment Committee for the City's 457(b) Deferred Compensation Plan (hereafter "457 Deferred Compensation Plan Committee"); and WHEREAS, effective in 2016, the Renton Regional Fire Authority ("RRFA") elected to participate in the City of Renton 457(b) Deferred Compensation Plan, and via Resolution No. 4337 the City Council adopted an amended and restated 457(b) Deferred Compensation Plan as the City's and the RRFA's joint multi -employer plan (Exhibit A to Resolution No. 4337); and WHEREAS, Resolution No. 4337 also confirmed the 457 Deferred Compensation Plan Committee's updated Operating Guidelines which named the voting members of the 457 Deferred Compensation Plan Committee to include representatives of both the City and the RRFA; and WHEREAS, at its December 18, 2018 meeting, the 457 Deferred Compensation Plan Committee reviewed and approved an amendment to Section 18, Rollover Contributions, of the Adoption Agreement contained within the 457(b) Deferred Compensation Plan. The amendment consists of selecting Section 18's option "A" which permits the following (to the extent permitted 1 AGENDA ITEM # 9. a) RESOLUTION NO. bylaw): "Rollovers to the Plan, including rollovers of Roth Elective Deferrals." Previously, Section 18's option "B" (excluding rollovers of Roth Elective Deferrals) had been selected; and WHEREAS, the City Council desires to ratify the 457 Deferred Compensation Plan Committee's amendment and, further, delegate authority to the 457 Deferred Compensation Plan Committee to make such subsequent amendments or updates to the 457(b) Deferred Compensation Plan as may be necessary or desired, provided that such amendments or updates do not impact the City's budget; NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON, DO RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS: SECTION I. The City Council hereby adopts an amended Section 18, Rollover Contributions, on page 7 of the Adoption Agreement contained within the City's 457(b) Deferred Compensation Plan, attached hereto as Exhibit A. All other portions of the 457(b) Deferred Compensation Plan adopted via Resolution No. 4337 remain in effect and unchanged; however, the City Council hereby authorizes the 457 Deferred Compensation Plan Committee to make such subsequent amendments or updates to the 457(b) Deferred Compensation Plan as may be necessary or desired, provided that such amendments or updates do not impact the City's budget. PASSED BY THE CITY COUNCIL this day of 12019. 2 Jason A. Seth, City Clerk AGENDA ITEM # 9. a) RESOLUTION NO. APPROVED BY THE MAYOR this day of 12019. Approved as to form: Shane Moloney, City Attorney RES:1801:1/18/19:scr W Denis Law, Mayor AGENDA ITEM # 9. a) RESOLUTION NO. EXHIBIT A PAGE 7 OF THE ADOPTION AGREEMENT CONTAINED WITHIN THE 457(b) DEFERRED COMPENSATION PLAN (C) [ ] Direct transfers from the Plan may not be made. 17. Transfers to Purchase Service Credits (Section 8.2) (Select one) If selected below, a Participant may request a transfer from this Plan to a defined benefit governmental plan to purchase service credit. [ X ] Yes, apply. [ ] No, do not apply. 18. Rollover Contributions (Section 3.10) (Select one) Note: An Eligible Governmental 457(b) Deferred Compensation Plan cannot accept rollovers of after-tax funds from another plan. If Roth Elective Deferrals are elected, an Eligible Governmental 457(b) Deferred Compensation Plan can accept rollovers of Roth Elective Deferrals from another Eligible Governmental 457(b) Deferred Compensation Plan, or as otherwise permitted under the Code. (A) [ ] Rollovers to the Plan, including rollovers of Roth Elective Deferrals, are permitted to the extent permitted by law. (B) [ ] Rollovers to the Plan, excluding rollovers of Roth Elective Deferrals, are permitted to the extent permitted by law. (C) [ ] Rollovers to the Plan are not permitted. 19.In-Service Distribution at Age 70'/z (Section 5.1(a)) (Select one) If selected below, a Participant may receive a distribution of all or a portion of his or her benefit upon attainment of age 70 '/2 prior to Severance from Employment. [ X ] Yes, apply. [ ] No, do not apply. 20. Unforeseeable Emergency (Section 5.5) (Select one) If selected below, a Participant may receive a distribution due to Unforeseeable Emergency prior to Severance from Employment. (A) [ X ] Yes, apply. If "Yes" is selected, please select who will be making the determination approving an Unforeseeable Emergency: 7 TIAA-CREF Financial Services Governmental 457(b) Deferred Compensation Plan Adoption Agreement 6/2013 AGENDA ITEM # 9. b) CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON, ADOPTING AN UPDATED RENTON TRAILS AND BICYCLE MASTER PLAN AND MAP. WHEREAS, Engrossed Substitute Senate Bill (ESSB) 5186, passed by the Washington State Legislature in April 2005, and effective July 24, 2005, made two amendments to Washington State's Growth Management Act (GMA) mandating the incorporation of bicycle and pedestrian planning into each jurisdiction's comprehensive plan, as well as the consideration of approaches that promote physical activity; and WHEREAS, the updated Renton Trails and Bicycle Master Plan and Map is a comprehensive update of the Renton Trails and Bicycle Master Plan, adopted in 2009. It represents a collaborative effort between the Transportation and Parks Divisions, and reflects the desire to create an interconnected trails, and non -motorized transportation network to accommodate both recreational and commuting uses, from pedestrians to cyclists; and WHEREAS, the updated Renton Trails and Bicycle Master Plan and Map creates and fosters opportunity within Renton and neighboring communities for people to move through the city and to access multiple local and regional destinations including schools, parks, businesses and residential areas; and WHEREAS, the updated Renton Trails and Bicycle Master Plan and Map was duly referred to the Planning Commission for investigation and study, and the matter was considered by the Planning Commission; and 1 AGENDA ITEM # 9. b) RESOLUTION NO. WHEREAS, the Planning Commission held a public hearing on December 5, 2018, considered all relevant matters, and heard all parties in support or opposition, and subsequently forwarded a recommendation to the City Council; and WHEREAS, the City Council considered all relevant matters, and heard all parties in support or opposition; NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON, DO RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS: SECTION I. The City Council does hereby adopt the updated Renton Trails and Bicycle Master Plan and Map, attached hereto as Exhibit "A" and incorporated by this reference, and asks that the Administration draw up a work program to begin implementing the plan. The updated Renton Trails and Bicycle Master Plan and Map shall remain in full force and effect until further revised, amended, or modified as provided by law. PASSED BY THE CITY COUNCIL this day of 12019. APPROVED BY THE MAYOR this Jason A. Seth, City Clerk day of 12019. Denis Law, Mayor 2 RESOLUTION NO. AGENDA ITEM # 9. b) Approved as to form: Shane Moloney, City Attorney RES:1798:1/18/19:scr AGENDA ITEM # 9. b) RESOLUTION NO. EXHIBIT "A" RENTON TRAILS AND BICYCLE MASTER PLAN AND MAP AGENDA ITEM # 9. b) AGENDA ITEM # 9. b) RENTON TRAILS AND BICYCLE MASTER PLAN January 2019 Adopted January 28, 2019 AGENDA ITEM # 9. b) AGENDA ITEM # 9. b) ACKNOWLEDGMENTS Executive Mayor Denis Law Chief Administrative Officer Robert Harrison City Council Members Don Persson, Council President Carol Ann Witschi, Council President Pro-tem Randy Corman Ryan Mclrvin Armondo Pavone Ruth Perez Ed Prince Parks Commission Cynthia Burns Al Dieckman Larry Reymann Tim Searing Shun Takano Troy Wigestrand Marlene Winter Planning Commission Angelina Benedetti, Commission Chair Jamian Smith, Commission Vice Chair Charles Seil, Commission Secretary Mara Fiksdal David Fleetwood Shannon Matson Michael O'Halloran Kevin Poole Robert Reeder Technical Advisory Committee Vicky Clarke, Cascade Bike Club Bob Elliot, Member, Renton Trails Advisory Committee Robert Foxworthy, King County Parks, Regional Trails Coordinator Rhubydee Laurencio, Youth advocate Pete Maas, Member, Renton Trails Advisory Committee Tim Moore, City of Renton, GIS Manager AGENDA ITEM # 9. b) Dai'Jana Perry, Youth advocate Mike Ullmer, King County Parks, Program/Project Manager Brian VanHouten, Renton Trails, Non -Profit Jean White, King County Parks, Regional Trails Program Manager Project Team Vangie Garcia, Transportation Planning Manager Leslie Betlach, Parks Planning and Natural Resources Director Angie Mathias, Long Range Planning Manager Aaron Raymond, GIS Analyst Consultants 2018-2019: BERK Consulting 2017: MacLeod Reckord, Fehr & Peers YOUR IDEAS — CONNECTING US TO OUR BEST FUTURE A special thank you to the many Renton community members who provided their time and thoughtful ideas to inspire this 2079 Trails and Bicycle Master Plan. AGENDA ITEM # 9. b) TABLE OF CONTENTS Executive Summary Introduction Why Plan? Benefits of Walking & Bicycling Relationship to Other Plans Plan Organization Plan Approval Process Trail & Bicycle Master Plan 1 Vision, Goals, & Objectives Introduction Vision — Renton Connection Goals & Objectives 2 Existing Conditions Trails & Bicycle System Characteristics Citywide Context Planning Area Profiles 3 Community Involvement Engagement Activities Open Houses Themes 4 Demand & Needs Analysis Gaps & Opportunities Benchmarks Level of Service 5 Trail & Bicycle System Plan Guiding Principles Network Recommendations Trail & Bicycle Facility Characteristics Shared Use Path Protected Bike Lane Buffered Bike Lane Striped Bike Lane Neighborhood Greenway iv iv 3 3 3 4 11 11 13 14 47 47 54 56 61 75 80 81 87 87 88 93 96 97 98 99 100 AGENDA ITEM # 9. b) Signed Shared Roadway Pedestrian Trails Facility Design Guidelines Projects & Priorities 6 Implementation Strategies Monitoring Phasing Partnership & Funding Opportunities Requirements & Incentives Community Education & Promotion Future Recommendations 7 References APPENDICES A. Community Engagement B. Regional Trail Design and Intersections C. Project Sheets D. Project Prioritization Documentation E. Adopting Resolution 101 102 103 110 121 121 121 122 124 126 127 133 AGENDA ITEM # 9. b) TABLE OF EXHIBITS Exhibit ES 1. Levels of Traffic Stress vii Exhibit ES 2. Level of Traffic Stress and Existing Network ix Exhibit ES 3. Level of Traffic Stress and Proposed Network x Exhibit ES 4. Existing and Proposed Trail Miles xi Exhibit ES 5. Proposed Increases in Regional and Local Trail Miles xi Exhibit ES 6. Proposed Regional and Local System Map xii Exhibit ES 7. Prioritization Process xiii Exhibit ES 8. Existing & Proposed Network and Project Map xv Exhibit 2-1 . Existing Trail Network Miles 1 1 Exhibit 2-2. Existing Trail Network 12 Exhibit 2-3. Citywide Demographic Characteristics 13 Exhibit 2-4. Existing and Proposed Network Miles by Community Planning Area 15 Exhibit 2-5. Community Planning Areas 16 Exhibit 2-6. Benson Hill Demographic Characteristics (within Renton City Limits) 17 Exhibit 2-7. Benson Hill Community Plan Area Characteristics 18 Exhibit 2-8. Benson Hill Planning Area Community Input 19 Exhibit 2-9. Cedar River Demographic Characteristics (within Renton City Limits) 20 Exhibit 2-10. Cedar River Community Plan Area Characteristics 21 Exhibit 2-1 1. Cedar River Planning Area Community Input 22 Exhibit 2-1 2. City Center Demographic Characteristics (within Renton City Limits) 23 Exhibit 2-13. City Center Community Plan Area Characteristics 24 Exhibit 2-14. City Center Planning Area Community Input 25 Exhibit 2-15. East Plateau Demographic Characteristics (within Renton City Limits) 26 Exhibit 2-16. East Plateau Community Plan Area Characteristics 27 Exhibit 2-17. East Plateau Planning Area Community Input 28 Exhibit 2-1 8. Highlands Demographic Characteristics (within Renton City Limits) 29 Exhibit 2-19. Highlands Community Plan Area Characteristics 30 Exhibit 2-20. Highlands Planning Area Community Input 31 Exhibit 2-21. Kennydale Demographic Characteristics 32 AGENDA ITEM # 9. b) Exhibit 2-22. Kennydale Community Plan Area Characteristics 33 Exhibit 2-23. Kennydale Community Planning Area Community Input 34 Exhibit 2-24. Talbot Demographic Characteristics 35 Exhibit 2-25. Talbot Community Plan Area Characteristics 36 Exhibit 2-26. Talbot Planning Area Community Input 37 Exhibit 2-27. Valley Demographic Characteristics 38 Exhibit 2-28. Valley Community Plan Area Characteristics 39 Exhibit 2-29. Valley Planning Area Community Input 40 Exhibit 2-30. West Hill Demographic Characteristics (within Renton City Limits) 41 Exhibit 2-31. West Hill Community Plan Area Characteristics 42 Exhibit 2-32. West Hill Community Planning Area Community Input 43 Exhibit 3-1. Walking Problems 49 Exhibit 3-2. Community Input Walking 51 Exhibit 3-3. Biking Problem Spots 52 Exhibit 3-4. Community Input Biking 53 Exhibit 3-5. Outreach Themes Table 56 Exhibit 4-1. Questionnaire 2017 Walking and Biking Frequency 61 Exhibit 4-2. Population Density and Existing Network 63 Exhibit 4-3. Job Density and Existing Network 64 Exhibit 4-4. Existing Trail Access to High -Density Residential and Job Nodes 65 Exhibit 4-5. Level of Traffic Stress Continuum 66 Exhibit 4-6. Level of Traffic Stress and Existing Network 67 Exhibit 4-7. Parks and Recreation and Existing Network 69 Exhibit 4-8. Low Income Census Tracts and Existing Network 71 Exhibit 4-9. PSRC Opportunity Index and Existing Network 73 Exhibit 4-10. Population Density and Proposed Network 76 Exhibit 4-1 1. Job Density and Proposed Network 77 Exhibit 4-12. Level of Traffic Stress with'/a Mile Service Area and Proposed Network 1/4 Mile Service Area LTS 1 & 2 78 Exhibit 4-1 3. PSRC Opportunity Index and Proposed Network 79 Exhibit 4-14. Miles of Trails per 1,000 Population - Renton and Peers 80 Exhibit 4-15. Miles of Trails per 1,000 (2018 - 2035) 81 Exhibit 4-16. Change LTS 1 &2 Trail Miles 82 Exhibit 4-17. Existing and Proposed Trail Miles by Community Planning Area 82 Exhibit 4-1 8. Percentage of Renton Residents within a Quarter Mile Service Area of LTS 1 & 2 Facilities 83 AGENDA ITEM # 9. b) Exhibit 5-1. Existing and Proposed Trail Miles 88 Exhibit 5-2. Regional and Local System Map 89 Exhibit 5-3. Existing and Proposed Regional Trail Miles 90 Exhibit 5-4. Regional Trail Alternatives 91 Exhibit 5-5. Regional and Local Trail Miles — Existing and Proposed 92 Exhibit 5-6. Regional and Local Trail Miles — Total Proposed Network 92 Exhibit 5-7. Facility Options by Roadway Characteristics 93 Exhibit 5-8. Existing and Proposed Network by Facility Type (Miles and Percent) 94 Exhibit 5-9. Existing and Proposed Trails by LTS Rating (Miles and Percent) 95 Exhibit 5-10. Shared -Use Path 96 Exhibit 5-1 1. Protected Bike Lane 97 Exhibit 5-12. Buffered Bike Lane 98 Exhibit 5-1 3. Striped Bike Lane 99 Exhibit 5-14. Neighborhood Greenway 100 Exhibit 5-15. Signed Shared Roadway 101 Exhibit 5-16. Pedestrian Trails 102 Exhibit 5-17. Renton Downtown Civic Core Wayfinding System 105 Exhibit 5-1 8. Bicycle Leaning Rail 107 Exhibit 5-1 9. Existing & Proposed Network and Project Map ill Exhibit 5-20. Prioritization Criteria and Indicators 1 1 3 Exhibit 5-21. Prioritization Process 114 Exhibit 5-22. Facility Types by Project Tiers (Miles) 115 Exhibit 5-23. Project Ranking 116 Exhibit 6-1. Potential Monitoring Measures and Targets 121 AGENDA ITEM # 9. b) THIS PAGE IS INTENTIONALLY BLANK 1 i s i R6.+ N 'T ': rS f r� Ivl �Cz �".R'� ?r� 4 �'-�+ _ �" ��•, 41 1; t l EXECUTIVE SUMMARY AGENDA ITEM # 9. b) RENTON TRAILS AND BICYCLE MASTER PLAN • CITY OF RENTON THIS PAGE IS INTENTIONALLY BLANK CITY OF RENTON • RENTON TRAILS AND BICYCLE MASTER PLAN AGENDA ITEM # 9. b) EXECUTIVE SUMMARY INTRODUCTION The City of Renton manages over 30 miles of regional and local trails and bicycle facilities. Most residents walk or bike in Renton in their neighborhoods. Yet existing trail and bicycle facilities serve only about one-third of Renton's population and about two thirds of employees. Many neighborhoods have limited and disconnected facilities. The City of Renton prepared a Trails and Bicycle Master Plan in 2009, one of few municipalities in Washington State addressing both pedestrian and bicycle modes in one plan. The 2009 plan steered several trail and bicycle lane extensions, and acquisitions for future extensions. (See sidebar.) Building on the prior plan, this Trails and Bicycle Master Plan will guide Renton's Trails and Bicycle system for the 2019-2025 timeframe. With the Plan, the City can seek funding and partnerships to invest in its historic neighborhoods as well as newer communities annexed with little trail and bicycle facility investments. Extensive community outreach has inspired this plan. By 2025 and beyond, this plan seeks to create one connected diverse system to support Renton's growing population and thriving economy. The system will increase comfort and encourage all ages and abilities to find destinations, recreate, and commute throughout Renton and the region. WHY PLAN? Eligibility for State Funding An update to this Plan is required every six years to maintain eligibility for grants administered by the Washington State Recreation and Conservation Office (RCO). RCO requires jurisdictional applicants to have a plan as a criterion for grant applications. This Plan is intended to comply with all RCO requirements. This plan can also serve as a foundation to seek other The City of Renton, alone and in partnership, implemented projects guided by the 2009 Trails and Bicycle Master Plan. Improvements ■ Cedar River Trail Turnback ■ Eastside Rail Corridor rail removal (King County lead) ■ Logan Ave Shared Use Trail ■ May Creek Trail construction (WRPA Trail and Outdoor Access Award 2015) ■ Springbrook Trail Boardwalk (WRPA Best Trail Project Award 2010) ■ Bike Lanes, e.g. NE 4th St and Duvall Ave ■ Signed Shared Roadways, e.g. Taylor Ave Acquisition & Funding ■ Lake to Sound Trail: interlocal agreement, construct segment along Black River Riparian Forest to Green River Trail in Tukwila ■ May Creek Trail Acquisitions: 6 parcels, 14.7 acres ■ May Creek Trail Property Donations: 4 parcels, 8.4 acres ■ Sam Chastain Waterfront Trail: Southport Easement, 4 of 4 ■ Tiffany/Cascade Connector acquisition: 1 parcel ■ Local grants totaling $1,624,500 ■ State Legislative Direct Appropriation: May Creek Trail, $500,000 JANUARY 2019 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY AGENDA ITEM # 9. b) RENTON TRAILS AND BICYCLE MASTER PLAN • CITY OF RENTON Current System The current system (yellow) serves the City Center, Cedar River, Springbrook Creek, May Creek, Honey Creek, and major arterials but does not cover most of the Renton's higher density population centers (blue). regional, state, and federal funding opportunities for non -motorized transportation improvements. Articulates a Vision that Directs Practices This plan includes a Vision for an accessible, diverse, and safe trail and bike system that offers places for active recreation, community connection, and equitable access to destinations and opportunities. This Vision is based on community input and inspired proposed projects intended to increase user comfort and reduce traffic stress to encourage walking and biking throughout the community. Efficiently Manages System This Plan is designed to efficiently manage the trail and bike system by: ■ Building on the existing regional and local system, ■ Providing a variety of facility types and phasing to maintain flexibility to respond to different route conditions and funding resources, ■ Connecting residents and employees with job centers, shopping, recreation, and services to advance economic and community development, and ■ Serving a diverse and growing population and addressing increased demands on the system. BENEFITS OF WALKING & BICYCLING Well -designed communities with recreation facilities can help Renton residents to lead more active lifestyles benefiting their health and well- being. The built environment can severely constrain routine avenues of physical activity. It is less attractive to walk or bike in areas with no facilities, high traffic, or long distances between origins and destinations. Communities designed for exercise can prevent 90 percent of type 2 diabetes, as well as 50% of heart disease, stroke, and site -specific cancers. There is a 50% increased likelihood that people who live near trails meet physical activity guidelines. (University of Minnesota. August 2007; Journal of Applied Physiology and Public Health Institute in Urban Land Institute 201 3) - JANUARY 20I9 •' -- EXECUTIVE SUMMARY AGENDA ITEM # 9. b) CITY OF RENTON • RENTON TRAILS AND BICYCLE MASTER PLAN Those participating in Renton's online questionnaires in 2017 participate in walking at a rate of about 85%, similar to state survey information. Improving facilities can help reinforce interest and participation. Parks and recreation facilities like trails, and access to centers and open spaces, provide economic value to a community by increasing property values, attracting long-term residents and employers, and supporting tourism. (American Planning Association 2001; Trust for Public Land, 2011 RELATIONSHIP TO OTHER PLANS This Renton Trails and Bicycle Master Plan is designed to implement Renton's Comprehensive Plan Land Use; Parks, Recreation, Natural Areas and Trails; and Transportation Elements. This Plan establishes the framework for future improvements and is a source of non -motorized project improvements for the City's Capital Facilities Plan Element, Six -year Capital Investment Program, and the Transportation Improvement Program. This Plan is a companion system plan to the Renton's Parks, Recreation, and Natural Areas Plan. This Plan is designed to be consistent with and leverage community plans such as the City Center Community Plan, Benson Hill Community Plan, and the Downtown Renton Civic Core Vision and Action Plan, and to implement the City Council's Policy Agenda. PLAN ORGANIZATION This plan is organized in seven sections building from a Vision to a Demand and Needs Analysis to a System Plan with prioritized projects. Community engagement and input informed each component of the plan. Implementation strategies complete the plan and identify monitoring and next steps. 1. Vision, Goals & Objectives 2. Existing Conditions 3. Community Involvement 4. Demand and Needs Analysis 5. Trail & Bicycle System Plan 6. Implementation Strategies 7. References 8. Appendices JANUARY 2019 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY AGENDA ITEM # 9. b) RENTON TRAILS AND BICYCLE MASTER PLAN • CITY OF RENTON 0 PLAN APPROVAL PROCESS Following extensive community and stakeholder outreach in 2017 where questionnaires and workshops were conducted, this Plan was reviewed and shaped by the Renton Parks Commission, Renton Planning Commission, and Renton City Council in 2018 and 2019. .71•Project M •Plan El TRAIL & BICYCLE MASTER PLAN This section highlights major elements of this Plan including the Vision and Goals, Community Involvement, Demand and Need, Level of Service, Network Recommendations, Projects and Priorities, and Implementation Strategies. For details see related Chapters. JANUARY 2019 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY AGENDA ITEM # 9. b) CITY OF RENTON • RENTON TRAILS AND BICYCLE MASTER PLAN Vision & Goals The Plan Vision and Goals and Objectives directed the development of the proposed network and projects included in this Master Plan and will continue to guide planning, funding, and implementing actions in the future. The Plan Vision describes Renton's ideal future Trails and Bicycle system: The Trails and Bicycle Master Plan fosters an integrated trail and bicycle system that connects the City's neighborhoods, community, and region. Residents, employees, and visitors can access a diverse system in urban and natural settings that are safe and comfortable for users of all ages and abilities. People can recreate, exercise, andlor commute for an active, healthy lifestyle. Reflecting the Vision, Goals describe desired results of this Plan: • Improving safety • Creating an accessible and connected system • Promoting physical and environmental health • Achieving equity • Enhancing the economy and community Community Involvement The City conducted an extensive public outreach and engagement process in 2017 to help form this Plan, including: ■ An online questionnaire with 340 full and partial responses ■ An interactive online mapping activity attracting 1,380-page views and 342 data points ■ Three in -person community open houses JANUARY 2019 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY AGENDA ITEM # 9. b) RENTON TRAILS AND BICYCLE MASTER PLAN • CITY OF RENTON ■ Three Technical Advisory Committee meetings, and with regional stakeholders ■ Two Interagency Regional Trails planning meetings with King County ■ Project briefings with the Parks Commission, Planning Commission, and the Renton City Council Based on outreach and engagement results, key findings include: 1. Recreation -based walking and biking is still a primary purpose. 2. Respondents preferred to walk shorter distances. 3. Respondents reported longer and more frequent bicycle trips. 4. Respondents preferred to walk and bike on formal facilities, as opposed to street shoulders. 5. The Cedar River Trail is the most heavily used trail. 6. Addressing pedestrian and bicyclist comfort is necessary to encouraging more travel and recreation by foot or bike. 7. Connection to transit is an important need. 8. Mountain biking and other more unique forms of bicycling are popular along lakes, streams, and rivers. 9. Equestrian use was not an identified need. See Chapter 3 and Appendix A for Community Engagement details. Demand & Needs for Trails and Bicycle Facilities To meet state requirements for planning, the City needs to define community needs and demand for trail and bicycle facilities. By understanding gaps and trends, the City can develop solutions like projects and actions. Particular needs and demands are highlighted below. Discontinuous Trail and Bicycle Network: Renton's current trail and bike routes serve several of the highest population and job density areas, though there are gaps particularly in the northeast and southeast parts of the city. Increased Growth and Demand: By 2035, the City has planned to add 16,700 housing units and over 31,000 jobs per the Renton Comprehensive Plan. The new residents and employees would increase the demand for all modes of travel including walking and biking. - JANUARY 20I9 •' -- EXECUTIVE SUMMARY AGENDA ITEM # 9. b) CITY OF RENTON • RENTON TRAILS AND BICYCLE MASTER PLAN Limited Low Traffic Stress Routes for Bicycles: Bicycle systems that provide low traffic stress and high connectivity attract wider usage. Bicycle routes can be rated based on the level of traffic stress (LTS) a user experiences. (Mineta Transportation Institute, 201 2) Exhibit ES 1 illustrates that lower LTS facilities serve a broader group of users because of increased comfort and safety. Renton has some LTS 1 & 2 routes, which are in Kennydale, Cedar River, and the Valley. Most of the community is not served by LTS 1 & 2 routes that offer off -road trails or dedicated and separated bicycle lanes. Exhibit ES 1. Levels of Traffic Stress Acceptable to ENTHUSED A CONFIDENT cyclists Increasing level of comfort, safety, and interest in bicycling for transportation Lwi r' Source: City of Renton, 201 8; BERK, 2018. Discontinuous Access to Destinations: Schools, parks, and employment centers are partially linked by trails and bicycle routes. There are missing links and gaps that deter non -motorized travel. Limited Access to Opportunities: The Puget Sound Regional Council (PSRC) has evaluated areas in terms of access to opportunities — education, economic, housing, transportation, and health/environment. The trail and bicycle network can increase opportunities by providing access for areas of lesser opportunity. The existing network is sparser in a few of the Community Planning Areas of Benson, Highlands, and West Hill (see sidebar and Chapter 2). JANUARY 2019 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY AGENDA ITEM # 9. b) RENTON TRAILS AND BICYCLE MASTER PLAN • CITY OF RENTON Community Planning Areas The City of Renton has defined 10 Community Planning Areas. Each have different characteristics and needs. See Chapter 2. Level of Service A "level of service" (LOS) refers to the amount and quality of trails and bicycle facilities that are necessary to meet current and future needs. A LOS helps establish a capital facility program. Costs and revenue can then be matched, and projects phased to help achieve the planned LOS. The City has developed a three-part LOS addressing quantity, quality, and distribution. 1. Quantity: Increase the miles of trails per 1,000 persons. 2. Quality: Increase the extent of LTS 1 and LTS 2 facilities to increase user comfort and participation. 3. Connectivity and Extent (Distribution): a. Reduce gaps and increase the coverage of facilities within all Renton community planning areas. b. Increase the share of residents and employees within a quarter mile of facilities. By implementing these levels of service, the City can close gaps and meet demands. For example, population and jobs in proximity to LTS 1 & 2 network shows nearly all areas of the community would have improved access. See Exhibit ES 2 and Exhibit ES 3. JANUARY 2019 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY CITY OF RENTON • RENTON TRAILS AND BICYCLE MASTER PLAN AGENDA ITEM # 9. b) Exhibit ES 2. Level of Traffic Stress and Existing Network u: rt, if F 000 N \ 0 0.5 1 Nines Source. City of Renton, 2018 JANUARY 2019 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY A 40 y Level of Traffic Stress (LTS) LTS (1 & 2) LTS (3 & 4) Quarter Mile Service Area LTS (1 & 2) U Community Center Library O Potential Transit Hub ® School AGENDA ITEM # 9. b) RENTON TRAILS AND BICYCLE MASTER PLAN • CITY OF RENTON Exhibit ES 3. Level of Traffic Stress and Proposed Network JANUARY 2019 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY AGENDA ITEM # 9. b) CITY OF RENTON • RENTON TRAILS AND BICYCLE MASTER PLAN Network Recommendations Renton's Trail and Bicycle System is an integrated system that will be expanded from about 30 miles to 127 miles within the city limits. This includes approximately 4 miles of existing trail facilities being upgraded or converted to different facility types. Another 8 miles of new, proposed trails are planned in areas immediately outside of Renton's city limits for an overall plan total of 135 miles. See Exhibit ES 4. Exhibit ES 4. Existing and Proposed Trail Miles Existing 30.20 30.20 Proposed 101.94 109.46 Source: City of Renton, 2018. The Trail and Bicycle System features a regional hub where the Cedar River trail, Lake to Sound Trail and the connection to the Eastside Rail Corridor connect in the City Center, and an expanded local network of trails. Regional trails connect Renton to other cities and regional destinations that lie to the north, east, south, and west. Local Connector routes tie together multiple Renton neighborhoods to one another and carry more non -motorized trips. Local Neighborhood routes connect destinations within the same neighborhood. See Exhibit ES 5 and Exhibit ES 6. Exhibit ES 5. Proposed Increases in Regional and Local Trail Miles Source: City of Renton, 2018; BERK, 2018. JANUARY 2019 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ---------------------------- AGENDA ITEM # 9. b) RENTON TRAILS AND BICYCLE MASTER PLAN • CITY OF RENTON Exhibit ES 6. Proposed Regional and Local System Map I 167 0 I Miles Sourcecity cidon, 2018 M da Trail Hierarchy Regional Local Connector Local Neighborhood Existing Trails Proposed Trail Community Center AA Library OPotential Transit Hub ® School - Parks & Open Space JANUARY 2019 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY AGENDA ITEM # 9. b) CITY OF RENTON • RENTON TRAILS AND BICYCLE MASTER PLAN Projects & Priorities Responding to gaps, needs, and community input, this plan promotes trail and bicycle facilities of all types across all Community Planning Areas. ■ Eighty proposed projects were identified and scored with the following Prioritization Criteria developed from Vision and Goals: Connectivity and Accessibility, Safety and Trail Experience, Equity, Economy and Community, Construction and Implementation. In addition, the City used two qualitative criteria to develop the Highest Priority Projects list (Tier 1 ): Partnership Commitments and Geographic equity. Since all proposed projects are important to the City, Tier 2 (High Priority) and Tier 3 (Medium) Priority were developed to distinguish the rest of the projects. See Exhibit ES 7 for the overall process. Exhibit ES 7. Prioritization Process Source: BERK, 2018. Once scored, three tiers of projects were developed with Tier 1 identifying the top priority projects for the City. The other two tiers spanned the natural breaks in the scores. Since some projects had identical scores, there were 27 projects in Tier 1, 26 projects in Tier 2, and 27 projects in Tier 3. These proposed projects added 1 01 .9 miles to the Trails and Bicycle network via multiple facilities types. JANUARY 2019 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY - - - - - ' . AGENDA ITEM # 9. b) AGENDA ITEMil 6w BOA v o zt o a� r 1 1 , al Lake Washington r "o''e Le Lakeridge Park m y r N N ova a ' « 9000Skyway u r a Park S 1 24thS m s • S �2gthst S 133rd St S 132nd St t or • N , > \ , c \ M, W Cedar River Trail Park N° am 1~ 1� 1 IZ 1 1 aVIP_r___7.' Way fy Cr reenway Newcas�leC/ub f Cougar rm 11 N 30th St Future � SW Athletic r♦ ® Complex • _ f ♦ � � ♦ a e d May ' 1 I 1 r 1 eek NS 24�h,St_ � • 1 1 � McA 'll-i ♦ 1 y.VL2.3;d PI 1 0_ W �•• 1 1 ; 1 Honey Creek m Z 1 1 ,� Greenway 1 a >u's /.L7 ♦ 1 I ♦� 1 �. UEJ 9th: at ID - a a 1 Gene Coulon >1 Memorial Beach 21 1 r ; , ��, �� �t 6 May Park 1 1 1 1-ri'H� 1 IValleyCounty 900 rr� `rf •a•(�• _i_ r__i�_ fJzr�St' 1 Park a ♦ I♦ 1♦ 1 ' I v ' I IT Moy v � 1� {,�♦ ��� � I � �4C{�193h�1i_�__L�EL4th�StJ plleyRd ♦ Cll Z ■ tea+ I c 1 Z Ia v� !�1 ZF ;IT, , N Sr ;Q cy 1 r 1 E 1� L >♦�3.wC �Ia ��fElUl�i. 1 1 o v 01 ' -fir I al = a' Ia> NE���t .. I Coaltfigld "'I r1:_.E, r� l0 1$t Sa•, �•►,ti'stjl., ■SF� .. NE I� I 1 St4' f y1 1IZ ;'.r SE 128th St IN,I Cedar Riverlo tN ® 1 > LakeSallfrAGThishl o�AveS�. r_a > At Cedar 1 h 1 �P CL' •-____�l v ��•, *River Ir ON • * 3 'a LT.1 900 +' ,•. Park l Maplewood 1 QI Foster rr O e \ GL7. 1 ) 1 Community Park I «I r Golf Course N Black River ,♦ 1 /fi{ ��LvO Propert I 10: Riparian • ��' j , 1 ^I ,'a, j Forest •��' rrrre• ■ 4T3 Riverview Park s Maplewood -- ��---•� �J-----_-_+_ HeightsPark •o w f S nth �t ♦ S 7th St I Cedar River Natural Area V r I �� t-_--�--_f___..__�C51 ate.... ® Maplewood s• mMetr I ♦ S 7th Sty Golf Course � ; 1 ., 1 Wat work ♦ ©-• / o Par Spri brook 14e1 1 ♦S r �-7 Fort Dent Trail d V.IaY S GTCI CH 1 BP • I� � 5 Gra Y � IN oo♦ ♦'>i m Imo 4, Ron Regis / O Park ; ♦� ♦ Iyk. ♦ GV r �y� SouthQenter Bl�a 1 I 1 m ♦N I e,Oa I ,�, ,���♦ Soosl4OtIl 1 3 •♦ I 1 p ; Creek and �ay Tukwila Pkwy N > '+' It Trail , -.,--�. Trail a ♦ 3 Panilher Creek I ; a♦ ' �.I �.rJ �,, 1�,, I a � w Wetlands T! __•�.� ♦ ♦___+�E,��Qi11+5 i-_-___ ' 1 w ¢ ; 'r ♦ ♦ r ; *1 Cascade ;ark ♦ 1 a 241 1 SW 271h St-• 1° ♦ 1 II - 1 Im 10 ♦ �O I I1 j 1 1 00 Gre 1 12 as ♦ Renton---------F--- R' er 1 ;> ♦ ♦ SE 168th St ail Wetlands 1 , 1a r� ♦ ,y N; r Re�tt4n Park SW thSt f1. (A�,7 A Iw AA ON QI j 1 1 � SW 41st St . j Edlund r•-LE PAtLPYltky."I_------•rr Y'Yr , Property 'oaC\ 1 I ♦, S 18 h.5t A r_-_ _ ,r� S 0 ; I 1 � V. ' 1 w 3A 1 j I w i-. SF.1 H4tIL§L r a o0e 1¢ ' I 1 1 I 1 1 I 1 1 41 / 1 SE 192nd St Cleveland / Richardson j Property __F Springbrook Watershed N r I N 0 0.5 1 Miles 167 a « N SE 183rd St N a Q SE 3ones Rd Cavanaugh Pond T Existing Trails Shared Use Path Striped Bike Lane Signed Shared Roadway Pedestrian Trail Proposed Trails •--- Shared Use Path •---• Protected Bike Lane Striped Bike Lane ---- Neighborhood Greenway Signed Shared Roadway Pedestrian Trail Parks & Open Space OCommunity Center Library O Potential Transit Hub r School Proposed Project Number, Name 17, Harrington Ave NE Neighborhood Greenway = 51, Pacific Railroad Trailhead & Trail 68, South Highlands Neighborhood Greenway 1, 1 16th Avenue SE Bike Lanes 18, Highlands Hillclimb 35, May Valley Trail 52, Panther Creek Trail 69, Springbrook Trail 2, 1 28th Avenue SE Bike Lanes 19, Hillcrest Neighborhood Greenway 36, Mill Avenue S Signed Shared Roadway 53, Powerline Trail 70, Springbrook Trail Extension 3, 156th Avenue SE Bike Lanes 20Honey Creek Trail Extensions 37, Monroe Avenue NE Bike Lanes 54, Puget Drive Bike Lanes & Signed Shared Roadway 71, Sunset Boulevard Hillclimb 4, Benson Drive S/108th Avenue SE Shared Use Pathji: Houser Way and Factory Avenue , N 4th Street Connector 4�lt` 55, Renton Connector 72, SW 16th Street Shared Use Path 5, Benson Neighborhood Greenway , Houser Way N Shared Use Path 39, N 6th Street Bike Lanes 56, Renton Park Neighborhood Greenway 73, SW 27th Street Connector 6, Benson Road/Main Avenue S Bike Lanes 23, Jericho Avenue NE Bike Lanes 40, N 8th Street Shared Use Path 57, S 2nd Street Protected Bike Lan 74, Talbot Road S Bike Lanes Wascade Waterline Spur Trail ' 24, Kennydale Neighborhood Greenway 41, Naches Avenue Shared U�lllll 58, S 3rd Street Signed Shared Roadway 75, Thunder Creek Trail 8, Cedar to Sammamish Trail 25, Kennydale Signed Shared Roadway 42, NE 3rd Street 59, S/SW 7th Street Transit Connector 76, Tiffany -Cascade Connector Trail 9, Duvall Avenue NE Bike Lan 26, Kenyon -Dobson Trail and Trailhead 43, NE 4th Street Bike Lanes 60, Sam Chastain Waterfront Trail 77, Tiffany Park Neighborhood Greenway 10, East Valley Road Shared Use Path , Lake to Sound Trail: East Segment 44, NE 1 2th Street Bike Lanes 61, SE 168Th Street Protected Bike Lanes 78, Tukwila Station Trail 11, Eastside Rail Corridor 28, Lake to Sound Trail: West Segment 45, NE 16th Street Signed Shared Roadway 62, SE 182nd & 184th Streets Neighborhood Greenway 79, Union Avenue NE Bike Lanes 12, Edmonds Avenue Connector 29, Lake Washington Loop Trail 46, NE Sunset Blvd Shared Use Path 63, SE Petrovitsky Road Shared Use Path 80, Wells Avenue S Signed Shared Roadway 13, Garden Avenue N Shared Use Path _ 30, Langston Road/SW 134th Street Hillclimb 47, Nile Avenue NE Bike Lanes 64, Seattle Waterline Spur Trail 14, Glencoe Neighborhood Greenway 31, Logan Avenue N Shared Use Path 48, North Highlands Neighborhood Greenway 65, Seattle Waterline Trail Highest Priorty Project 15, Grant Avenue Neighborhood Greenway 32, Maplewood Heights Neighborhood Greenway 49, North Southport Drive Shared Use Path 66, Shattuck to Airport Connector 16, Hardie Avenue Bike Lane & Shared Use Path 33, May Creek Hillclimb 50, Oakesdale Avenue Bike Lanes Soos Creek Trail AGENDA ITEM # 9. b) CITY OF RENTON • RENTON TRAILS AND BICYCLE MASTER PLAN AGENDA ITEM # 9. b) Implementation Strategies A plan is meaningful when it is implemented. This Master Plan identifies several strategies and future recommendations to develop a unified trail and bicycle system for the Renton community. Monitoring: The City will track its performance periodically to determine progress on plan implementation and to adaptively manage its resources. The Performance measures can potentially include: ■ Percentage of bicycle facility network completed in gaps, to schools, to parks. ■ Percentage increase in LTS 1 or 2 network. ■ Percentage of households within 1/a mile of network. Percentage increase in network serving children, elderly, households in poverty. ■ Percentage increase in access to high density residential or commercial zones, transit, or services. Percentage progress on Tier 1 Projects. ■ Projects programed and completed in six -year CIP. Phasing and Fee in Lieu: Renton may phase improvements and consider alternative trail and bicycle facility types and cross sections. The City could implement development requirements for trail or bicycle facilities or a fee in lieu. Partnerships: Continue existing and seek new partnerships to advance funding for design and construction of priority projects. Current and Future Funding: Continue existing funding sources and pursue other funding sources that would be dedicated to the provision of trails and bicycle facilities. Requirements: Update city regulations to reference this plan and adopt new regulations that require trail easements for areas where key local or regional trails have been identified in this plan. Eastside Rail Corridor in Renton, ceremonial spike -pulling event, Renton Reporter, October 2017 Incentives: Continue incentive programs, like Commute Trip Reduction programs by large employers develop incentives for developers when amenities for transit users, bicyclists, and pedestrians are included in their plans. JANUARY 2019 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY---------------------------- AGENDA ITEM # 9. b) RENTON TRAILS AND BICYCLE MASTER PLAN • CITY OF RENTON Events & Promotion: Promote community engagement and healthy lifestyles by: ■ Promoting awareness of the trail and bicycle system by advertising its system, ■ Marketing recreation and community events in association with trails and bicycle facilities including fun runs, races, and other activities, ■ Supporting guided walking and biking tours, and ■ Working in partnership with King County Metro on expanding its transit to trail program. Safety & Awareness: Develop traffic safety materials and pursue implementing design standards that help enforce safe and responsible for all traffic modes. Future Policy Explorations: There are many policies and trends the City can further explore, including but not limited to: ■ Multimodal transportation levels of service for use in transportation concurrency standards and mitigation fees. ■ Sidewalk plan integration with this Trails and Bicycle Plan to coordinate planning and implementation of its non -motorized system. ■ Whether and how to implement a Vision Zero program that sets a goal of zero traffic deaths or severe injuries through holistic, integrated action strategies. Renton will determine the best combination of monitoring and implementation strategies based on available resources and needs. - JANUARY 20I9 �' -- EXECUTIVE SUMMARY AGENDA ITEM # 9. b) CITY OF RENTON • RENTON TRAILS AND BICYCLE MASTER PLAN JANUARY 2019 AGENDA ITEM # 9. b) RENTON TRAILS AND BICYCLE MASTER PLAN • CITY OF RENTON THIS PAGE IS INTENTIONALLY BLANK AGENDA ITEM # 9. b) CITY OF RENTON • RENTON TRAILS AND BICYCLE MASTER PLAN 1 VISION, GOALS, & OBJECTIVES INTRODUCTION The Plan Vision, Goals, and Objectives describes the future the community aspires to achieve and how the City will act to achieve the Vision. The Vision articulates the ideal future the Plan wishes to achieve. Goals address outcomes encapsulated in the Vision. Objectives define specific actions that, if completed, will accomplish a certain goal. The Vision, Goals, and Objectives together provide a road map for the City to achieve Renton's best Trails and Bicycle facilities system. VISION - RENTON CONNECTION The Trails and Bicycle Master Plan fosters an integrated trail and bicycle system that connects the City's neighborhoods, community, and region. Residents, employees, and visitors can access a diverse system in urban and natural settings that are safe and comfortable for users of all ages and abilities. People can recreate, exercise, and/or commute for an active, healthy lifestyle. Source: City of Renton 3 JANUARY 2019 VISION, GOALS, & OBJECTIVES AGENDA ITEM # 9. b) RENTON TRAILS AND BICYCLE MASTER PLAN • CITY OF RENTON GOALS & OBJECTIVES Five goals and related objectives are stated in the following pages. Goal A: Improving safety Improve safety for non -motorized use and facilities. Objective A.1: Invest in the development and maintenance of high quality walking and bicycling infrastructure. Objective A.2: Promote bicycling and pedestrian safety through educational programs and community outreach. Objective A.3: Minimize obstructions and conflicts along high speed, high traffic streets that restrict the movement of non -motorized users. Objective AA Provide safe and convenient storage and parking facilities for non -motorized users. Objective A.5: Promote design and maintenance practices that deter crime including appropriate visibility and comfort through lighting, proper placement of plantings, access control, and other techniques. 6 �F L 7J, �ftk VISION, GOALS, & OBJECTIVES CITY OF RENTON • RENTON TRAILS AND BICYCLE MASTER PLAN AGENDA ITEM # 9. b) Goal B: Creating an accessible and connected system Develop an inter -connected trail network. Objective B.1: Enhance non -motorized connections between neighborhoods, schools, public transit, recreation facilities and other community destinations. Objective B.2: Complete the connections between the regional trails within Renton. Objective B.3: Continue to connect to non -motorized networks in adjacent jurisdictions. Objective BA Mitigate barriers in the non -motorized network, including freeways, busy intersections, steep slopes, railways, and waterways. Objective B.5: Fill in gaps and missing links. Objective B.b: Identify easily accessible trail head and access points throughout the network. Objective B.7: Coordinate with citywide planning efforts. Objective B.8: Balance new acquisition and development with the sustained maintenance of existing facilities. Objective B.9: Ensure Renton's codes and standards advance the implementation of the Trails and Bicycle Plan cross sections through appropriate requirements, phasing, and incentives. ,a1Cc WIWI IT }` `r JANUARY 2019 VISION, GOALS, & OBJECTIVES 0 AGENDA ITEM # 9. b) RENTON TRAILS AND BICYCLE MASTER PLAN • CITY OF RENTON Goal C: Promoting physical and environmental health Improve the health of the community through sustainable design and increase the rates of walking, running, and bicycling. Objective C.1: Increase access to the recreational and non -motorized trail network. Objective C.2: Promote non -motorized travel as a viable means of transportation and as an important method for maintaining overall health and fitness. Objective C.3: Provide facilities that accommodate users of all ages and abilities. Objective CA Utilize Complete Streets to provide increased opportunities for non -motorized access and use and promote improved air and water quality. Objective C.5: Increase awareness of the non -motorized and recreational trail network. Objective C.b: Support education and appreciation of the natural environment while protecting wetlands, streams, steep slopes, and cultural resources. Objective C.7: Minimize impacts to the environment by employing best management practices. VISION, GOALS, & OBJECTIVES CITY OF RENTON • RENTON TRAILS AND BICYCLE MASTER PLAN AGENDA ITEM # 9. b) Goal D: Achieving equity Ensure that all members of the community have equitable access to walking and bicycling facilities. Objective D.1: Employ strategies to include underserved populations in community outreach. Objective D.2 Invest in non -motorized facilities across the Renton community. Objective D.3: Develop the network to enable a diverse range of experiences and activities in natural and urban settings. Objective D.3: Support, encourage and promote active transportation for users across a wide range of age, income, and physical abilities. Objective DA Ensure signage and informational materials are accessible and comprehensible by a wide range of users. Objective D.5: Plan for land use densities and mixed -use development patterns that encourage walking, hiking, biking and other non -motorized uses and connectivity. Objective D.5: Implement a multimodal level of service that maximizes mobility. r smile i1i � � � � � � W � M '1 JANUARY 2019 VISION, GOALS, & OBJECTIVES 0 AGENDA ITEM # 9. b) RENTON TRAILS AND BICYCLE MASTER PLAN • CITY OF RENTON Goal E: Enhancing the economy and community Enhance the economy and vibrancy of the community by increasing walking and bicycling. Objective E.1: Support and promote a non -motorized transportation culture to attract more businesses and residents. Objective E.2: Leverage Renton's position at the convergence of regional trails to promote the economic vitality of the city. Objective E.3: Capitalize on the natural area trail systems to promote outdoor nature activities. Objective EA Implement improvements to promote Renton as a walkable community. Objective E.5: Provide secure bicycle parking at community destinations and incentivize provision of bicycle facilities in private development. Objective E.6: Continue to develop and nurture partnerships to leverage resources and implement projects, programs and activities that increase the reach and effectiveness of the bicycle and trail network. Objective E.7: Identify and secure a wide variety of funding sources. Cedar River Trail, City of Renton VISION, GOALS, & OBJECTIVES AGENDA ITEM # 9. b) CITY OF RENTON • RENTON TRAILS AND BICYCLE MASTER PLAN JANUARY 2019 AGENDA ITEM # 9. b) RENTON TRAILS AND BICYCLE MASTER PLAN • CITY OF RENTON THIS PAGE IS INTENTIONALLY BLANK AGENDA ITEM # 9. b) CITY OF RENTON • RENTON TRAILS AND BICYCLE MASTER PLAN 2 EXISTING CONDITIONS TRAILS & BICYCLE SYSTEM CHARACTERISTICS The City currently has approximately 30 miles of trails of different types — shared use paths that accommodate pedestrians and bicyclists, dedicated bike lanes, and dedicated pedestrian trails. See Exhibit 2-1. Trails are located chiefly along water bodies and major routes but are not fully connected and there are major population centers that are not currently being served. See Exhibit 2-2. Exhibit 2-1. Existing Trail Network Miles FACILITY EXISTING Shared Use Path 7.67 Protected Bike Lane - Protected Bike Lane - Two -Way Protected Bike Lane - Striped Bike Lane 9.70 Striped Bike Lane 9.70 Buffered Bike Lane - Neighborhood Greenway - Signed Shared Roadway 2.47 Pedestrian Trail 10.36 Boardwalk 0.26 Hard Surface Trail 6.32 Soft Surface Trail 3.79 Source: City of Renton, 2018. JANUARY 2019 EXISTING CONDITIONS - - - - - ' . AGENDA ITEM # 9. b) RENTON TRAILS AND BICYCLE MASTER PLAN • CITY OF RENTON Exhibit 2-2. Existing Trail Network JANUARY 2019 EXISTING CONDITIONS CITY OF RENTON • RENTON TRAILS AND BICYCLE MASTER PLAN AGENDA ITEM # 9. b) CITYWIDE CONTEXT The City of Renton has seen growth and change in the past three decades Population increased from 50,052 in 2000 to 104,100 in 2018, partly through annexations. The City added jobs in the same period, with employment growing from 55,519 jobs in 2000 to 61,920 in 2018. Median household income has risen to $66,050 today. As the City has grown the proportion of older and younger residents remained relatively constant, hovering at roughly 10% and 23% respectively. Rates of vehicle ownership have also remained steady citywide, with 90-95% of city households having access to a car. However, mirroring regional and national trends, the city has become more racially diverse. The proportion of non -white residents increased from 35% in 2000 to 54% in 2018. Exhibit 2-3. Citywide Demographic Characteristics Jobs Population Under 18 & 65 and Over 61,920 42% 23% 23% 55,519 10% 10% 54,050 NMI 10 10 1 2000 2070 2018 2000 2070 Median Household Income Race (2018) Two or More $61,819 $66,050 Races, 60/D $45,820 Non Native Hawaiian and Other Pacific •••., Islander, 2% 2000 2070 2018 Households with Vehicle Asian, 230/6 Hispanic or Latino, 12% 10% 2078 . • • White, d6% 94% 93% 141 =Mm ' 1W Black or African 2000 2070 2018 American, 10% Source: OFM, 2017; King County Assessor, 2017; PSRC, 2017; On The Map (OTM) (US Census), 2015; 2016 ACS (US Census), 5-Year Estimate; BERK, 2018. JANUARY 2019 EXISTING CONDITIONS ----------------------- AGENDA ITEM # 9. b) RENTON TRAILS AND BICYCLE MASTER PLAN • CITY OF RENTON PLANNING AREA PROFILES The City of Renton and its Potential Annexation Areas are comprised of many distinct communities, each with their own unique districts and neighborhoods. Given the need to plan effectively for this diverse set of communities, the City of Renton and its Potential Annexation Areas are divided into ten geographically distinct Community Planning Areas as shown in Exhibit 2-5. Community Planning Areas share community identity, schools, existing infrastructure, and physical features. Through the Community Planning process, residents, businesses, and other stakeholders develop a local vision and establish policies that address issues of growth, quality of life, design, and capital improvements in their respective planning area. Thus far, Community Plans have been adopted for two Community Planning Areas (City Center and Benson Hill) while others are planned for the future. Overall, existing trail miles in the city limits indicate a concentration of facilities in the City Center which includes a hub of regional trails like the Cedar River Trail, Lake to Sound Trail, connection to the Eastside Rail Corridor, and waterfront park pedestrian trails and bike lanes. An additional concentration of existing facilities is situated in the Valley where the Springbrook Trail is located. See Exhibit 2-4. Recognizing the need for geographic equity, and to address the County's limited historical investment in large annexation areas such as Benson Hill, this Trails and Bicycle Plan will increase trail miles in all Community Planning Areas. The greatest increases are planned in Benson Hill and Highlands Community Plan Areas — two areas that are currently largely underserved. The following section summarizes demographic and Community Planning Area Characteristics of nine Community Planning Areas within the City and places it in the context of the City as whole. Demographic data shown reflects only those portions of the respective Community Planning Areas that are located within Renton's city limits. As a result, the Fairwood planning area is excluded as it resides entirely outside the City. - JANUARY 2019 �' -- EXISTING; CONDITIONS AGENDA ITEM # 9. b) CITY OF RENTON • RENTON TRAILS AND BICYCLE MASTER PLAN Exhibit 2-4. Existing and Proposed Network Miles by Community Planning Area dKAWW K.W TL11 V`;�y WJKT "at Source: City of Renton, 2018. - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 15 JANUARY 2019 - EXISTING CONDITIONS '' - - - '. AGENDA ITEM # 9. b) RENTON TRAILS AND BICYCLE MASTER PLAN • CITY OF RENTON Exhibit 2-5. Community Planning Areas —IF I�,, rlsWNI 410: (\16j OWN y ■ 169 r 111 FA sis Renton City Limit Community Planning Areas Benson .. f � Cedar River milk �'�� City Center East Plateau ■ Fairwood 1 I 1� qi Highlands Kennydale Talbot 0 0.5 I AMiles 167 Valley Source: City of Renton, 2018 West Hill JANUARY 2019 EXISTING CONDITIONS CITY OF RENTON • RENTON TRAILS AND BICYCLE MASTER PLAN AGENDA ITEM # 9. b) Benson Hill Community Plan Area The Benson Hill Community Plan area is a predominantly residential area over four square miles in size. Population for the entire Community Planning Area is 25,140 people as of 2018. Benson Hill houses 24% of Renton's population, and 27% of its households. Exhibit 2-6 summarizes selected demographic characteristics of Benson Hill and places it in the context of the city as whole. Exhibit 2-7. summarizes key Community Plan Area Characteristics that influence travel patterns and mobility. Exhibit 2-6. Benson Hill Demographic Characteristics (within Renton City Limits) Jobs Population Under IS & 65 and Over 61,920 23 % 10% 2,350 Renton Benson Renton Median Household Income Race Hispanic or Latino, 14% $66,050 $62,907 Two or More Races, 7% Native Hawaiian Renton Benson and Other Pacific ....... Islander, 2% Households with Vehicle Asian, 20%---* 93% 95% 22% Benson 11% •White, 45% Black or African Renton Benson American, 11 Source: OFM, 2017; King County Assessor, 2017; PSRC, 2017; On The Map (OTM) (US Census), 2015; 2016 ACS (US Census), 5-Year Estimate; BERK, 2018. JANUARY 2019 EXISTING CONDITIONS - - - - - ' . AGENDA ITEM # 9. b) RENTON TRAILS AND BICYCLE MASTER PLAN • CITY OF RENTON Exhibit 2-7. Benson Hill Community Plan Area Characteristics Neighborhood Assets and Destinations Assets and destinations include: Tiffany Park, Cascade Park, and Renton Park (King County) provide walking trails, children's play areas, and recreational opportunities to area residents. Philip Arnold Park is immediately north of this planning area and is accessible to Benson residents via an unpaved road right- of-way owned by Seattle Public Utilities. The Cedar River Natural Area is along the northern boundary of the area. To the east, the Soos Creek Corridor (King County) and Boulevard Lane Park (King County park) offer large natural areas. ■ There is a future Family First Community Center on 1 16'h. ■ The commercial areas, including Cascade Village are key destinations. ■ The Renton School District operates seven schools in the area. ■ Several major utility corridors cross the area, providing informal trails, recreation links, and views. 1 16th Avenue SE is the central spine of Benson Hill, connecting neighbors to Cascade Village, Cascade and Benson Hill Elementary Schools, and several informal trail networks. 140th Ave SE (existing bike lanes), Benson Road South, and Talbot Road South are used for biking. Puget Drive SE and hiking/walking trails in Existing Cedar River Natural Zone, are heavily used routes. In addition, the City of Travel Routes Seattle water pipeline corridors provide walking routes in the area. Major transit routes are along 108th Ave SE, 1 16th Ave SE, Puget Drive SE, SE 168th Street, SE Carr Road, SR 169 Renton -Maple Valley Road, and Talbot Road South. Buses 169, 148, 102, and Dart 906 serve the area. Transit Routes Community input identified the need for walking improvements at the following problem spots for walking: 11 6rh Ave, SE 181 st St, SE 182nd St, near Soos Creek Park and trail, areas south of 108rh Ave SE south of SE Carr Road, and near Thunder Hill Creek Trail. Locations identified as bicycling problem spots include: Benson Road S, SE 192nd St, 108rh Ave SE. Finishing the Soos Creek Trail was also identified as a need. An area Community Input west of Benson Way S was identified as a popular location for mountain biking. See Exhibit 2-8. - JANUARY 2019 �' -- EXISTING; CONDITIONS AGENDA ITEM # 9. b) CITY OF RENTON • RENTON TRAILS AND BICYCLE MASTER PLAN Exhibit 2-8. Benson Hill Planning Area Community Input 515: • �' 0 8 0 b a 1 o - Q 1 � I SE 16811i St v Q � N 0 O N Q a N - N �O ^ SE Petrovitsky Rd 1� ` 0 1 SE Carr Rd O 1 a 1 r� 1 Benson Hill Planning • O �` w Area • O Existing Trails O v Q O Locations of Community o Feedback —` Community Center AA Library • ® School Parks & Open Space O Renton City Limit • v 0 0.25 0.5 11 5 Miles 5ource. Gty of Reinon, 2018 1 19 JANUARY 2019 EXISTING CONDITIONS AGENDA ITEM # 9. b) RENTON TRAILS AND BICYCLE MASTER PLAN • CITY OF RENTON Cedar River Community Planning Area The Cedar River Community Planning area is a predominantly residential area with a population of 4,210 people as of 2018. This is 4% of Renton's population, and 1 6% of its households. Exhibit 2-9 summarizes selected demographic characteristics and places the area in the context of the city as whole. Exhibit 2-10 summarizes key Community Plan Area Characteristics and community input around destinations, travel patterns, and overall mobility. Exhibit 2-9 Jobs 61,920 Cedar River Demographic Characteristics (within Renton City Limits) Population Under 18 & 65 and Over - 380 ' Renton Cedar River Median Household Income Race $83,459 $66,050 E 0 Renton Cedar River Households with Vehicle 93% 96% 23 % Renton Two or More Races, 8% Asian, 23°/cr " 23% 10% Hispanic or Latino, 7% 13% Cedar River -White, 54% Black or African Renton Cedar River American, 8% Source: OFM, 2017; King County Assessor, 2017; PSRC, 2017; On The Map (OTM) (US Census), 2015; 2016 ACS (US Census), 5-Year Estimate; BERK, 2018. - - JANUARY 2019 - - - - - EXISTING CONDITIONS AGENDA ITEM # 9. b) CITY OF RENTON • RENTON TRAILS AND BICYCLE MASTER PLAN Exhibit 2-10. Cedar River Community Plan Area Characteristics Neighborhood Assets and Destinations Assets and destinations include: ■ Maplewood Golf Course ■ Ron Regis Park ■ Cedar River Park (includes a non -motorized boat launch as well as other picnic and park facilities). ■ Renton Community Center ■ Henry Moses Aquatic Center ■ Carco Theatre The Cedar River Trail (CRT) follows the Cedar River from where it enters Lake Washington in the City of Renton upriver to Landsburg, the boundary of the City of Seattle's Cedar River Watershed. The trail follows a historic railroad route along State Route 169, and passes through the City of Renton, City of Maple Valley, and unincorporated King County. It offers views and access to Lake Washington, downtown Renton, Cedar River Park, Existing Travel Maplewood Golf Course, Ron Regis Park, Cedar Grove Park (King County Routes park), and Maple Valley. The CRT is popular with pedestrians, runners, bicyclists, and skaters and provides both recreational and non -motorized commuting opportunities. Maple Valley Highway is a bus route for Metro Transit 143, 102, and Dart 907. Transit Routes Community input identified the following locations as a walking problem spots: 154rh PI SE and unofficial dirt trails in the Cedar River Natural Zone. The following location was identified as a bicycling problem spot: 136'h Ave SE. An additional three locations along Maple Valley Highway were identified as walking and bicycling destinations. See Exhibit 2-1 1. Community Input JANUARY 2019 EXISTING CONDITIONS AGENDA ITEM # 9. b) RENTON TRAILS AND BICYCLE MASTER PLAN • CITY OF RENTON H Exhibit 2-1 1. Cedar River Planning Area Community Input 90 `I I v v NE 1/7 St o z Q v 0 _ > z i a Q w > > o a Q a -o N 4th St w NE 411i St --� N 3rd St SE 7 281h St �E gfd Ss ! °Ibq I —I 1�-----I L� 1 L—.i 16 1 1 I 1 p` ` • SE Jones Rd S Puget pr w m 0 1 A 1 r N -Cedar River Planning I a Area 68th St Lj Existing Trails w O Locations of Community a> #r Feedback Z 1 Community Center I1■ Library — SF Petro 0 Potential Transit Hub I kyR a School I ` Parks & Open Space ; Renton City Limit 40 SE 183rd St i- 0 /- 0.25 0.5 i A 515 —�TI—; Miles ' Source. City of Reixon, 2018 1 JANUARY 2019 EXISTING CONDITIONS AGENDA ITEM # 9. b) CITY OF RENTON • RENTON TRAILS AND BICYCLE MASTER PLAN City Center Community Planning Area The City Center Community Planning Area includes a population of 13,030 people as of 2018. This is roughly 1 3% of Renton's population, and 16% of its households. City Center is a major employment center for Renton with 27,850 jobs or roughly 45% of the city's employment. Exhibit 2-1 2 summarizes selected demographic characteristics and places the area in the context of the city as whole. Exhibit 2-1 3 summarizes key Community Plan Area Characteristics and community input around destinations, travel patterns, and overall mobility. Exhibit 2-12. City Center Demographic Characteristics (within Renton City Limits) Jobs Population Under 18 & 65 and Over 61,920 23% 18% 14% 27,850 10% Renton City Center Renfon City Center Median Household Income Race Two or More Races, 511/6 $66,050 $57,299 Native Hawaiian and Other Pacific ........ Islander, 2% Renton City Center Households with Vehicle Asian, 16%•'' Hispanic or Latino, 9% -White, 55% 93 % 8- Black or African r Renton City Center American, 1 3% Source: OFM, 2017; King County Assessor, 2017; PSRC, 2017; On The Map (OTM) (US Census), 2015; 2016 ACS (US Census), 5-Year Estimate; BERK, 2018. JANUARY 2019 EXISTING CONDITIONS - - - - - ' . AGENDA ITEM # 9. b) RENTON TRAILS AND BICYCLE MASTER PLAN • CITY OF RENTON Exhibit 2-13. City Center Community Plan Area Characteristics Neighborhood Assets and Destinations Existing Travel Routes Transit Routes Community Input ■ Downtown Renton with a traditional retail "main street" on S 3rd Street. ■ The Downtown Library, Senior Center, Renton Pavilion Event Center and Piazza Park are popular community gathering places. ■ A regional commercial cluster is located primarily in the southern portion of the City Center and serves as a retail hub. ■ Parks and destinations include Burnett Linear Park, Cedar River Trail, Gene Coulon Memorial Beach Park, Jones Park, Kiwanis Bicentennial Air Park, Liberty Park, Philip Arnold Park, Piazza Park, Downtown Park, Skate Park, Tonkin Park, Veterans Memorial Park, and the Renton Memorial Stadium. ■ Historic Renton High School and STEM -focused Sartori Elementary School are important to community identity. ■ The northern portion of this community planning area includes Renton Boeing manufacturing facilities, and mixed -use communities of the Landing and Southport. Major existing travel routes include: ■ Cedar River Trail ■ Lake Washington Blvd. ■ Logan Ave N. ■ Rainier Ave N. Currently, the Renton Transit Center existing in the center of downtown, but the South Grady Park and Ride will become the city's major transit center with future Sound Transit and WSDOT improvements. Metro Transit bus routes 101, 105, 106, 107 143, 148, 153, 167, 169, 240, 342, 907, 908, Sound Transit routes 560, 566, and Rapid Ride F route serves the area. There is also a Park & Ride at Fred Meyer. Community input identified the following locations as problem spots for walking: S 7th St, Houser Way S, near Logan Street bridge, Logan Avenue N, Lake Washington Blvd, and Burnett Avenue N. A connection from the Cedar River Boathouse to Coulon Park was also identified as a need. The following locations were identified as bicycling problem spots: SW 7r" St, Rainier Ave S, Houser Way S, Logan Ave N, N 6'" St, Lake Washington Blvd., and N Park Dr. A Boeing/Airport bypass trail connecting Coulon Park with Perimeter Road/Rainier and bike racks near stores in the Landing were identified ideas for the future. See Exhibit 2-14. - JANUARY 2019 �' -- EXISTING; CONDITIONS CITY OF RENTON • RENTON TRAILS AND BICYCLE MASTER PLAN AGENDA ITEM # 9. b) Exhibit 2-14. City Center Planning Area Community Input 0 LP �' S 133,d St S I32ncK ♦ City Center Planning Area Existing Trails O Locations of Community Feedback JCommunity Center Library Potential Transit Hub School Parks & Open Space Renton City Limit ` 0 A'� 0.25 0.5 Nines I. So�rc' CiT�� ty of ReiNon, 2018 JANUARY 2019 EXISTING CONDITIONS W oY 3 16th St v Q NE 7t/t St NE3d9 AGENDA ITEM # 9. b) RENTON TRAILS AND BICYCLE MASTER PLAN • CITY OF RENTON East Plateau Community Planning Area The East Plateau Community Planning Area includes a population of 9,770 people as of 2018. This is roughly 9% of Renton's population, and 9% of its households. Exhibit 2-15 summarizes selected demographic characteristics and places the area in the context of the city as whole. Exhibit 2-16 summarizes key Community Plan Area Characteristics and community input around destinations, travel patterns and overall mobility. Exhibit 2-15. East Plateau Demographic Characteristics (within Renton City Limits) Jobs Population Under 18 & 65 and Over 61,920 26% 23 % 14on Renton Fast Plateau Median Household Income $99,977 $66,050 Renton fast Plateau 10% No Renton Race Two or More Races, 6% Asian, 259/a•••.., Hispanic or Lafino, 8% 11% East Plateau •••.White, 56% Households with Vehicle 98% American Indian 93% and Alaska ............. Native, 1 Black or African Renton fast Plateau American, 4% Source: OFM, 2017; King County Assessor, 2017; PSRC, 2017; On The Map (OTM) (US Census), 2015; 2016 ACS (US Census), 5-Year Estimate; BERK, 2018. - JANUARY 2019 - - - - EXISTING CONDITIONS AGENDA ITEM # 9. b) CITY OF RENTON • RENTON TRAILS AND BICYCLE MASTER PLAN Exhibit 2-16. East Plateau Community Plan Area Characteristics Schools in the Planning Area include Hazen High School, Apollo Elementary, Maplewood Heights Elementary, Liberty High School, Maywood Middle School, and Briarwood Elementary. The one -acre Maplewood Park (King County park), Coalfield Park (King County park), and the Hazen Community Pool are other neighborhood assets and destinations. Neighborhood ■ NE 4'h St and Duvall have active commercial areas Assets and Destinations NE 4th Street, May Valley Road, and SR 900/Sunset Blvd are major travel corridors. 156rh Ave SE/154rh PI SE is important connector to SR 169 and Cedar River Trail. Existing Travel Routes NE 4th Street is a major bus route. King County Metro bus routes 1 1 1 and Dart 908 serve the area. Transit Routes Community input identified the following locations as problem spots for walking: along Hoquiam Ave NE, Nile Ave NE, along NE 2nd St, along Jericho Ave SE, along NE 4th St, along Duvall Ave NE, along 144rh Ave SE and along 156th Ave SE. The following locations were identified as problem spots for bicycling: Hoquiam Ave NE, NE 4th St and near 154rh PI SE. See Exhibit 2-17. Community Input ----------------------------- 27 JANUARY 2019 - EXISTING CONDITIONS '' - - - '. AGENDA ITEM # 9. b) RENTON TRAILS AND BICYCLE MASTER PLAN • CITY OF RENTON 0 Exhibit 2-17. East Plateau Planning Area Community Input `rF �4 Z • yL m 4�j Q � a a 0 • z • Q • sF o : MoY Volley Rd • • � soo _ � N • c • (�.�� • • ■ • • Sri, s, East Plateau Planning . Area • • Existing Trails O Locations of Community Feedback " n School �� ^ 1 • Parks & Open Space Renton City Limit SE es Rd o.s Source. Gty of Renton, 2018 JANUARY 2019 EXISTING CONDITIONS AGENDA ITEM # 9. b) CITY OF RENTON • RENTON TRAILS AND BICYCLE MASTER PLAN Highlands Community Planning Area The Highlands Community Planning Area includes a population of 29,800 people as of 2018. This is roughly 29% of Renton's population, and 30% of its households. Exhibit 2-1 8 summarize selected demographic characteristics and places the area in the context of the city as whole. Exhibit 2-1 9 summarizes key Community Plan Area Characteristics and community input around destinations, travel patterns, and overall mobility. Exhibit 2-18. Highlands Demographic Characteristics (within Renton City Limits) Jobs Population Under 18 & 65 and Over 61,920 23% 22% 10% 9% Renton Highlands Renton Highlands Median Household Income Race $66,050 $67,927 Two or More Races, 5% Hispanic or Latino, 18% Renton Highlands Native Hawaiian and Other Pacific ....... Islander, 1 % Households with Vehicle .•.•White, 46% 93% 95% Asian, 23%•'' Black or African Renton Highlands American, 71/6 Source: OFM, 2017; King County Assessor, 2017; PSRC, 2017; On The Map (OTM) (US Census), 2015; 2016 ACS (US Census), 5-Year Estimate; BERK, 2018. JANUARY 2019 EXISTING CONDITIONS - - - - - ' . AGENDA ITEM # 9. b) RENTON TRAILS AND BICYCLE MASTER PLAN • CITY OF RENTON Exhibit 2-19. Highlands Community Plan Area Characteristics Neighborhood Assets and Destinations ■ Schools in the Planning Area include McKnight Middle School, Highlands Elementary, Sierra Heights Elementary School, Meadowcrest Early Learning Center, Rainier Christian School, and Honeydew Elementary School. Open space and park assets include Honey Creek and May Creek Natural Areas, Sierra Heights King County), North Highlands and Meadowcrest Playground, and Glencoe Parks. Phase I of Sunset Park recently opened, Phase II will be completed in 2020. Community centers are also located on both sides of SR 900 at Highlands and North Highlands Parks. ■ The Renton Technical College, Kennydale Memorial Hall, and the Renton Highlands Library. ■ The Renton Sunset mixed -use neighborhood. ■ Sunset Blvd/SR 900 and NE 3rd St/NE 4Th St are main east -west routes. ■ Union Avenue NE and Edmonds Ave NE are key north -south routes. ■ Trails near Honey Creek connect to May Creek Natural Area Existing Travel Routes Sunset Blvd. and Duvall Ave NE are major transit routes King County Metro routes 240, 105, 1 1 1, and Dart 908 serve the area. Park & Rides are at St. Matthew's Lutheran Church and Renton Bible Church. Transit Routes Community input identified the following locations as problem spots for walking: SE 1 brh St, NE 20rh ST, SE 95rh Way, and an area near SE 104th St. The following locations were identified as bicycling problem spots: NE 3rd St, Sunset Blvd, and Duvall Ave N. Connections from Honey Creek to Lake Washington and to Union Ave were identified as ideas for the future. See Exhibit 2-20. Community Input - JANUARY 2019 �' -- EXISTING; CONDITIONS CITY OF RENTON • RENTON TRAILS AND BICYCLE MASTER PLAN AGENDA ITEM # 9. b) Exhibit 2-20. Highlands Planning Area Community Input r T a N 3rd St I - I .� 1 J 1 1 L� 16 1 1 1 I 1 _ Highlands Planning Area Existing Trails O Locations of Community Feedback OCommunity Center Library School Parks &Open Space I�L7j Renton City Limit N 0 0.25 0.5 Miles Source City of Renton, 2018 JANUARY 2019 EXISTING CONDITIONS AGENDA ITEM # 9. b) RENTON TRAILS AND BICYCLE MASTER PLAN • CITY OF RENTON Kennydale Community Planning Area The Kennydale Community Planning Area is a predominantly residential area that includes a population of 7,570 people as of 2018. This is roughly 7% of Renton's population, and 8% of its households. Exhibit 2-21 summarizes selected demographic characteristics and places the area in the context of the city as whole. Exhibit 2-22 summarizes key Community Plan Area Characteristics and community input around destinations, travel patterns and overall mobility. Exhibit 2-21. Kennydale Demographic Characteristics Jobs Population Under 18 & 65 and Over 61,920 23 % 18% 10% _ 1,010 - Renton Kennydale Renton Kennydate Median Household Income Race Hispanic or Latino, 8% $84,973 Two or More $66,050 Races, 6% Renton Kennydale Asian, 20%-... Households with Vehicle 93% 94% can Black orAfAmerican, American, 5% Renton Kennydale 12% ---White, 61% Source: OFM, 2017; King County Assessor, 2017; PSRC, 2017; On The Map (OTM) (US Census), 2015; 2016 ACS (US Census), 5-Year Estimate; BERK, 2018. - JANUARY 2019 - - EXISTING CONDITIONS AGENDA ITEM # 9. b) CITY OF RENTON • RENTON TRAILS AND BICYCLE MASTER PLAN Exhibit 2-22. Kennydale Community Plan Area Characteristics Neighborhood Assets and Destinations Assets and destinations include: ■ The Kennydale Elementary School ■ Kennydale Beach Park ■ Kennydale Lions Park ■ May Creek Natural Area and Trail ■ Eastside Rail Corridor ■ Lake Washington Loop Trail ■ Virginia Mason Athletic Center? (VMAC)/Seattle Seahawks Headquarters ■ Commercial area on NE 44rh St, just east of 1-405 Lake Washington Blvd., Park Ave. N, NE 30'h St, and NE 271h St are major travel routes. Existing Travel Routes Interstate 405 is a major transit route that serves King County Metro bus routes 1 1 1, 167, 342, 952, 567, and Sound Transit routes 560 and 566. A Bus Rapid Transit (BRT) station is planned for the NE 44Th St exit and there is an existing Park & Ride at Kennydale United Methodist Church. Transit Routes Community input identified the following locations as problem spots for walking: along N 30th St, N 33rd St, along Aberdeen Ave NE, and along Jones Ave NE. Locations along Lake Washington Blvd, along Lincoln Ave NE and along NE 27'h St were identified as bicycling problem spots. See Exhibit 2-23. The Eastside Rail Corridor will be the location of a new regional trail, and preferred alignments were discussed at public open Community Input houses and with King County. ------------------------ 33 JANUARY 2019 - EXISTING CONDITIONS '' - - - '. AGENDA ITEM # 9. b) RENTON TRAILS AND BICYCLE MASTER PLAN • CITY OF RENTON Exhibit 2-23. Kennydale Community Planning Area Community Input Newcastle Tr, 1 1 � 1 I U 1 1 1 1 Kennydale Planning Area Existing Trails O Locations of Community Feedback Library C' Potential Transit Hub CSchool Parks & Open Space Renton City Limit A Miles S..— Gty .f R..t. 2018 JANUARY 2019 EXISTING CONDITIONS CITY OF RENTON • RENTON TRAILS AND BICYCLE MASTER PLAN AGENDA ITEM # 9. b) Talbot Community Planning Area The Talbot Community Planning Area includes a population of 10,060 people as of 2015. This is roughly 10% of Renton's population, and 10% of its households. Exhibit 2-24 summarizes selected demographic characteristics and places the area in the context of the city as whole. Exhibit 2-25 summarizes key Community Plan Area Characteristics and community input around destinations, travel patterns and overall mobility. Exhibit 2-24. Talbot Demographic Characteristics Jobs Population Under 18 & 65 and Over 61,920 23 % 5,100 Renton Talbot Median Household Income $66,050 $75,719 E 0 Renton Talbot Race 10% Renton 23% Two or More Hispanic or Latino, 5% Races, 7% Native Hawaiian and Other Pacific - Islander, 5% Households with Vehicle 97% 9_ Renton Talbot Source: American Community Survey, 2015. Asian, 29%•' American I and Alaska• N ative, 1 % 12% Talbot Black or African American, 13% -White, 41 % JANUARY 2019 EXISTING CONDITIONS - - - - - ' . AGENDA ITEM # 9. b) RENTON TRAILS AND BICYCLE MASTER PLAN • CITY OF RENTON Exhibit 2-25. Talbot Community Plan Area Characteristics Neighborhood Assets and Destinations Assets and destinations include: ■ The Talbot Hill Elementary School. ■ Developed park assets include the 10-acre Thomas Teasdale Park and the public tennis and pickleball courts located at Talbot Hill Reservoir Park. ■ Panther Creek Wetlands ■ Valley Medical Center and surrounding area is major medical hub. ,,-r i ' Benson Drive South (SR 515) and SE Carr Road are major travel routes for this area. Existing Travel Routes King County Metro bus route 169 runs along Talbot Road S. and 108'h Ave SE. Metro Dart route 906 serves east -west to the Valley. Transit Routes Community input identified the following locations as problem spots for walking: the hill between SE Carr Rd and SE 200'h St. SE 200'h was also identified as a bicycling problem spot. Connecting City -owned park property to Panther Creek Wetlands, connecting Panther Creek Wetlands to the Springbrook Trail, and connecting to Strander Blvd in Tukwila on SW 27'h St were identified as ideas for the future. See Exhibit 2-26. Community Input - - - JANUARY 2019 �' -- EXISTING; CONDITIONS CITY OF RENTON • RENTON TRAILS AND BICYCLE MASTER PLAN AGENDA ITEM # 9. b) Exhibit 2-26. Talbot Planning Area Community Input G1adY way S WG SW 1 6th St 3 3 N N N W > a a m a a v w SW 27th St a O SW 34th St SW 41 st St � , 1 Oa ' O � 1 JANUARY 2019 EXISTING CONDITIONS r-artft.— SE 168th St m Q ,o SE Petrovitsky Rd Talbot Planning Area Existing Trails O Locations of Community Feedback �* Community Center School Parks & Open Space Renton City Limit N 0 0.25 0.5 Miles \67 Sovrce. Oty of Renton, 2018 AGENDA ITEM # 9. b) RENTON TRAILS AND BICYCLE MASTER PLAN • CITY OF RENTON Valley Community Planning Area The Valley Community Planning Area is a major employment center with 20,350 or roughly 33% of the city's jobs. The Valley Medical Center is located in this Planning Area. This is the least populated planning area with only a population of 180 people as of 2018. Exhibit 2-27 summarizes selected demographic characteristics and places the area in the context of the city as whole. Exhibit 2-28 summarizes key Community Plan Area Characteristics and community input around destinations, travel patterns and overall mobility. Exhibit 2-27. Valley Demographic Characteristics Jobs Population Under 18 & 65 and Over 61,920 23 % 24% 20,350 11 10% Renton Valley Renton Valley Median Household Income Race $66,050 $75,719 Two or More Races, 8a/a Renton Talbot Households with Vehicle Hispanic or Latino, 13% White, 28% 93% 9Asian, 230/v•"' — Black or African Renton Valley American, 27% Source: OFM, 2017; King County Assessor, 2017; PSRC, 2017; On The Map (OTM) (US Census), 2015; 2016 ACS (US Census), 5-Year Estimate; BERK, 2018. as_ �------------------------ - JANUARY 2019 — - - — EXISTING CONDITIONS CITY OF RENTON • RENTON TRAILS AND BICYCLE MASTER PLAN AGENDA ITEM # 9. b) Exhibit 2-28. Valley Community Plan Area Characteristics Neighborhood Assets and Destinations ■ There are no schools in this Community Planning Area. ■ Open space assets include the Black River Riparian Forest and the Springbrook Valley Wetlands. ■ Lake to Sound Trail ■ There are multiple commercial/employment providers in this area, including IKEA, Providence Health & Services, Boeing, and Kaiser Permanente. ■ Black River Trail and the Springbrook Trail. ■ Lake to Sound Trail will connect to the Interurban and Green River Trails in 2020. Existing Travel Routes SW Grady Way and SR 167 are main transit routes. King County Metro route 153 and Rapid Ride F route serves the area. Metro routes 952, and Sound Transit routes 566 and 567 run along I-167. The Tukwila Sounder Station is a key origin/destination for transit users in this area. Transit Routes Community input identified locations along SW 43rd St as problem spots for walking and biking. Specific locations identified along the street as problem spots for bicycling include: S 180r" St, SW Grady Way, Oakesdale Ave SW and SW 7'" St. A better connection between the Lake to Sound Trail and Interurban Trail and addressing gaps in trails due to private property (Springbrook Trail) were also identified as ideas for the Community Input future. See Exhibit 2-29. s ----------------------- 39 JANUARY 2019 - EXISTING CONDITIONS -' - - - '. AGENDA ITEM # 9. b) RENTON TRAILS AND BICYCLE MASTER PLAN • CITY OF RENTON Exhibit 2-29. Valley Planning Area Community Input S 1 33rd St S 132nd `` Renton Ave 5 10 � � oft� 0 a o N� S O t o • S4 7rh Sr 4 Grady `Nov • • __ SW 16th St I : Southceitet • Tukwila Pkwy S 180th St v a v 3 � N a v O a' a SW 271h StJ I SW 34th St • _ S W 41 st St. 1 SW 43rd St a A 0 a- N QValley Planning Area Existing Trails O Locations of Community Feedback Community Center Library Potential Transit Hub School Parks & Open Space Renton City Limit 1 0 0.25 0.5 A1 1M les Source. Oty of Renton, 2018 JANUARY 2019 EXISTING CONDITIONS AGENDA ITEM # 9. b) CITY OF RENTON • RENTON TRAILS AND BICYCLE MASTER PLAN West Hill Community Planning Area The West Hill Community Planning Area is a predominantly residential area with a population of 4,340 people as of 2018. This is roughly 4% of Renton's population, and 4% of its households. Exhibit 2-30 summarize selected demographic characteristics and places the area in the context of the city as whole. Exhibit 2-31 summarizes key Community Plan Area Characteristics and community input around destinations, travel patterns and overall mobility. Exhibit 2-30. West Hill Demographic Characteristics (within Renton City Limits) Jobs Population Under IS & 65 and Over 61,920 23% 24% 10% 10% Renton West Hill Renton West Hill Median Household Income Race Hispanic or Latino, 1 1 % #66,050 $53,361 Two or More Races, 7% Renton West Hill Households with Vehicle White, 25% Asian, 26°/v 93% 91% Black or African Renton West Hill American, 30% Source: OFM, 2017; King County Assessor, 2017; PSRC, 2017; On The Map (OTM) (US Census), 2015; 2016 ACS (US Census), 5-Year Estimate; BERK, 2018. JANUARY 2019 EXISTING CONDITIONS — — — — — ' . AGENDA ITEM # 9. b) RENTON TRAILS AND BICYCLE MASTER PLAN • CITY OF RENTON Exhibit 2-31. West Hill Community Plan Area Characteristics Schools in the Planning Area include Campbell Hill Elementary, Dimmitt Middle School, Bryn Mawr Elementary, Albert Talley High School and Lakeridge Elementary School Park assets and destinations include Earlington Park, Skyway Park (King County park), Lakeridge Park (King County park). Skyway Library is a key destination and asset. Neighborhood Assets and Destinations Rainier Avenue South along Lake Washington is a main travel corridor for the area. Renton Ave South runs through the heart of West Hill. SR 900, west of Rainier Ave S. is major city gateway from 1-5. Existing Travel Routes Renton Avenue South and SR 900 are bus routes. King County Metro bus routes 106, 107, 101, 102, and 143X serve the area. There is an existing Park & Ride at City View Church. Transit Routes Community input identified bicycling problem spots at the following locations: along S Sunnycrest Rd, and south of Sunset Blvd. A safe bicycling route connecting to Skyway and West Hill, along SW Langston Rd, was identified as an idea for the future. See Exhibit 2-32. Community Input - - - JANUARY 2019 �' -- EXISTING; CONDITIONS CITY OF RENTON • RENTON TRAILS AND BICYCLE MASTER PLAN AGENDA ITEM # 9. b) Exhibit 2-32. West Hill Community Planning Area Community Input West Hill Planning Area Existing Trails O Locations of Community Feedback Community Centel - Library OPotential Transit Hub School Parks & Open Space Renton City Limit 0 0,25 0.5 Nvles 5—ce Gty of Renton, 2018 JANUARY 2019 EXISTING CONDITIONS ,a00 AGENDA ITEM # 9. b) AGENDA ITEM # 9. b) CITY OF RENTON • RENTON TRAILS AND BICYCLE MASTER PLAN JANUARY 2019 AGENDA ITEM # 9. b) RENTON TRAILS AND BICYCLE MASTER PLAN • CITY OF RENTON THIS PAGE IS INTENTIONALLY BLANK AGENDA ITEM # 9. b) CITY OF RENTON • RENTON TRAILS AND BICYCLE MASTER PLAN 3 COMMUNITY INVOLVEMENT ENGAGEMENT ACTIVITIES The City conducted an extensive public outreach process, with an online questionnaire, an interactive mapping activity, and three in -person community open houses. Three meetings were organized with a Technical Advisory Committee. The City also met with regional stakeholders. Project briefings were presented to the Parks Commission, Planning Commission, and the Renton City Council. Results are summarized in this Chapter with more detailed information in Appendix A. Top Takeaways Based on the outreach the key takeaways include: 1. Recreation -based walking and biking is still a primary purpose. Commuting by bike and on foot is also occurring and could be encouraged more. 2. Respondents preferred to walk shorter distances, around their neighborhoods, mainly for recreation. Walking was not seen as a primary mode of transportation. 3. Respondents reported longer and more frequent bicycle trips. Bicyclists bike within and beyond their neighborhood to trails, work places or school, or civic or recreation facilities. 4. Respondents preferred to walk and bike on formal facilities such as sidewalks, streets, or paved trails. 5. The Cedar River Trail is the most heavily used trail. Not surprisingly, given its central location within the city and its length, respondents cited the Cedar River Trail as the most used non -motorized trail. Trails along other riparian corridors, such as the Springbrook Creek, Honey Creek, and May Creek were less frequently used. 6. Addressing pedestrian and bicyclist comfort is necessary to encourage more travel and recreation by foot or bike. Discontinuous or missing sidewalks, walking on roads with fast moving traffic, and difficulty crossing came up as top barriers to walking. Barriers to biking focused on the absence of biking facilities (e.g. paved JANUARY 2019 COMMUNITY INVOLVEMENT - - - - - ' . AGENDA ITEM # 9. b) RENTON TRAILS AND BICYCLE MASTER PLAN • CITY OF RENTON shoulders, bike lanes, shared use paths), dangerous crossings and streets with fast moving cars. The lack of wayfinding was also cited as a potential barrier. 7. Connection to transit is an important need. Transit is often accessed by walking and biking and connections to current and future transit is a key link. 8. Mountain biking and other more unique forms of bicycling are pursued by about a quarter of questionnaire respondents, who enjoy riding along lakes, streams, and rivers. 9. Equestrian use was not an identified need. The questionnaire included questions on horseback riding, but no respondents offered input. Questionnaire The City issued a questionnaire in summer 2017 for nearly three months and received 340 responses (131 full and 209 partial). Respondents are more able-bodied than Census reports for the city. The share of questionnaire respondents with children is similar to Census reports for Renton. Questionnaire respondents are more likely to commute by walking or bicycling than the city as a whole. Results showed: ■ Purpose of Walking/Biking: Walking, running, and biking activities tend to be more for recreation purposes rather than for transportation. ■ Frequency: Most respondents walk at least 2 times per week or more, and bike 1 day per week or less. ■ Destinations: Most respondents walk or bike around their neighborhood or to a public facility. In the case of bicyclists, they also frequently use trails. While respondents visited a wide number of Renton park, recreation, and civic facilities, the most well visited ones were along Lake Washington and the Cedar River. ■ Traffic Stress: Renton questionnaire respondents indicated that 25% were confident on any road, about 50% were comfortable with roads having some traffic but prefer those with wide shoulders or lanes or trails, and over 20% were concerned about traffic and other factors. ■ Barriers & Incentives - Walking or Running: Top barriers to running or walking included street crossings, traffic, discontinuous sidewalks, or locations along roads. Top improvements to encouraging walking or - - - JANUARY 2019 �' -- COMMUNITY INVOLVEMENT AGENDA ITEM # 9. b) CITY OF RENTON • RENTON TRAILS AND BICYCLE MASTER PLAN running, include more curb ramps, sidewalks, more shared -use trails, maintenance, and enforcement of traffic laws and biking. ■ Barriers & Incentives — Biking: Top barriers to biking include motor vehicle speed, lack of bicycle facilities, too many cars, and routes that are stressful or dangerous. Top improvements include safer intersections, wider shoulders on roads, more shared use trails, and street calming measures in residential areas. Interactive Maps An interactive online map was open to public input from June 10, 2017 to August 31, 2017. The interactive map site had 1,380-page views and 342 data points. Participants could identify areas where they walked or biked, and problem areas. Maps and summaries of comments follow. Walking Based on input received, walk problems included lack of sidewalks and connections as well as traffic, speeding, and other dangerous conditions. Most pedestrian problem spots were identified in the East Plateau, North Highlands, and mid-Kennydale Planning Areas. See Exhibit 3-1 and Exhibit 3-2. Exhibit 3-1. Walking Problems Source: Tag Word Cloud. ------------------------ 49 JANUARY 2019 - - COMMUNITY INVOLVEMENT - - - _ '. AGENDA ITEM # 9. b) RENTON TRAILS AND BICYCLE MASTER PLAN • CITY OF RENTON The range of comments included: ■ Nice walk, but would feel much safer with sidewalk (Kennydale area). ■ No sidewalk for most of this very busy road (Sunset area). ■ Need signage and wayfinding to connect to Cedar River trail. ■ Missing ADA ramp. ■ There is no way to get up and down the hill safely between Carr Rd. and SE 200th St.... That's a 1.25-mile sidewalk desert. Destinations included the Cedar River Trail and May Creek Trail. Many respondents reported walking in neighborhoods on the Renton plateau (East Plateau Community Planning Area), as well as in the valley near Springbrook Trail and Black River Trail (Valley Community Planning Area). - JANUARY 2019 r' COMMUNITY INVOLVEMENT CITY OF RENTON • RENTON TRAILS AND BICYCLE MASTER PLAN AGENDA ITEM # 9. b) Exhibit 3-2. Community Input Walking D 4o Qo �e 3 e 1P Bb o� 4a J S y?9th Si S 133rd St S 132, coed. Woy m Nowcostlo Go/f Ctub Ry \ Z + r a 0 0 40 '900� Q 1 2 II!T! Z ii o Q ? _ NE 7tb St a INE 4th S� / N 41h w N3rdSt Sr tlEgcdSt •� © ��. Atl S;y S:v 7th St Jet J v ;N e a s 180th 181� C o SW16th Sr ` H 05 a S Puger pr Q+ a o SW 7th St Y v O m i H SE 168th St SW 4th St j W (51 S W 41 st St sR6 S� Lor i f 0 0', 1 A1 1 1Ahles '.I c- Source Oty of Pernoo, 2018 JANUARY 2019 COMMUNITY INVOLVEMENT SE 192nd St © Walking Destination Walking Problem Spot Route that I Walk 001 Difficult Walking Route sE - Existing Trails AGENDA ITEM # 9. b) RENTON TRAILS AND BICYCLE MASTER PLAN • CITY OF RENTON Biking Community comments on biking problem spots were similar to comments about walking. Biking problems related to concerns about travel lanes and trails, and traffic and safety conditions. Based on comments, most bike problem spots follow future alignments of the regional trail system. See Exhibit 3-3 and Exhibit 3-4. Exhibit 3-3. Biking Problem Spots Source: Tag Word Cloud. Destinations included the Cedar River Trail, Green River Trail, Lake Washington Loop Trail, and other neighborhood locations. Comments addressed different connections or safety concerns such as: ■ Add bike trail between Cedar & Green river trails. ■ Need a safe bike route connecting to Skyway and West Hill. ■ Sunset Blvd provides the best grade for connectivity with Highlands, needs bike lanes. ■ Best bike route up Benson Hill is not clear. Probably old Benson Rd, but need bike lanes to continue. Consider road diet south of Puget. ■ Very narrow shoulder, difficult connection to Jones Road from Cedar River Trail. ■ Cars using wrong lane, conflicting with NB left turning bikes and cars. (Renton/Kent border) ■ 1 ride around this area as the bridge is too narrow and unsafe, I have nearly crashed many times on this bridge. (Renton/Tukwila Border) - JANUARY 2019 �' COMMUNITY INVOLVEMENT CITY OF RENTON • RENTON TRAILS AND BICYCLE MASTER PLAN AGENDA ITEM # 9. b) Exhibit 3-4. Community Input Biking cowl, WOY m Nowc°.fle Goff C/u8q ,C 3 tl o ti oho 1 •J �, Ob o00 A 0 ' oro 0 of b O !. 2 E0 0 0 ,r0 O0 • orJ oSo 1 Q o` SOo'he°nr°r el.d 1. 3 3 S P-9-1 Or y e o � —C77 a u c � • 6 p S W 2 St N i SE 168th St SW 4th Sr j H 3 — S 15; W Sw 41cr sr S 180th e 181 s{ �Su a � a 0 0.5 1 A�ITI� Kyles ' 167) Source City of Renton, 2018 SE 208+ JANUARY 2019 COMMUNITY INVOLVEMENT ■I 00 oSto - olo h Sp PO'rO�crr4 < YRtl v SE 192nd 51 Biking Destination Biking Problem Spot Route that I Bike cloy Difficult Biking Route SE 10p�tc Existing Trails AGENDA ITEM # 9. b) RENTON TRAILS AND BICYCLE MASTER PLAN • CITY OF RENTON OPEN HOUSES Three open houses were held in 2017. Input at the community open houses included neighborhood specific feedback on needed improvements, as well as preferred connections and routes. No input on equestrian facilities was received. -35 persons Preferred routes and facility types -Thoughts on potential routes -Problem spots -Wish list projects -Projects to complete -General concerns and ideas -26 persons •Regional Trail options -Preferences on network -Questions about facility designation -Plan Priorities -30 persons Regional Trail preferences -Final Network options -Facility type discussion Prioritization and project preferences Needed improvements included: ■ Intersection improvements along the Cedar River Trail downtown, Houser Way and Lake Washington Boulevard, and the NE 6th and NE 8th at Logan Avenue N. ■ Improvements for SW 7th to make it more bike -friendly ■ Sidewalk improvements across neighborhoods Preferred Connections and Routes included: ■ Completion of the proposed Sam Chastain trail segment and the Soos Creek Trail north of 1 92nd St. (King County responsibility) ■ Completion of Burnett Linear Park, South and North in Civic Core ■ Houser Way was cited by many as the preferred alignment of the Eastside Rail Corridor - - - JANUARY 2019 - - - - - COMMUNITY INVOLVEMENT AGENDA ITEM # 9. b) CITY OF RENTON • RENTON TRAILS AND BICYCLE MASTER PLAN King County Meetings Coordination with King County Parks and Recreation Division, Capital Projects Program, and Governmental Relations was essential to plan development with the convergence of four regional trails within Renton's Urban Growth Area: The Cedar River Trail (CR), Eastside Rail Corridor (ERC), Lake to Sound Trail (L2S), and the Lake Washington Loop Trail. The purpose of the meetings was to collaborate with King County representatives on possible and preferred routing for the regional trails through the City of Renton, discuss alternative facility types for these corridors, update on the status of the Civic Core planning effort and review proposed cross sections for the corridors in that plan, and review the status of other regional trails/routes. Two meetings were held to identify and agree upon the alignment and facility designation(s) for the regional trails. Detailed meeting summaries, route concepts, and cross -sections are included in Appendix B of this plan. Technical Advisory Committee Community members volunteered to participate in the Technical Advisory Committee for this plan which included additional background and educational discussions to provide feedback for plan development. Important considerations included: ■ The importance of connecting regional trails ■ The importance of the transit center as a destination ■ Recognition that trail users are not as aware of traffic control devices like Rectangular Rapid Flash Beacons (RRFB) or C-curbs; this lack of awareness should be addressed in design options ■ Cost considerations, and related "low hanging fruit" or easy wins are important to elevate as criteria The following trouble spots were identified primarily about bicycling except where noted: ■ Near Dimmitt Middle School the location of a pedestrian -vehicle crash ■ Crossing Sunset Blvd. near Harrington ■ NE Park Drive Freeway ramps ■ Gate on Houser Way at Kenworth JANUARY 2019 COMMUNITY INVOLVEMENT AGENDA ITEM # 9. b) RENTON TRAILS AND BICYCLE MASTER PLAN • CITY OF RENTON ■ NE 3rd street for bikes ■ Connection on Factory Ave. ■ Rainier Ave. and Hardy Ave. The following barriers were identified: ■ Lack of comfort in high speed/volume conditions ■ Lack of wayfinding TAC members were in agreement with the projects identified in the preliminary list and the conceptual plans for intersections. (See Appendix B of this plan.) THEMES Key themes emerged from the broad input received through outreach activities. The key themes and representative quotes are shown in the Exhibit 3-5. Exhibit 3-5. Outreach Themes Table Safety Safety is a high priority theme that benefits users across the board and encourages less experienced riders to use the trail network. The network should be designed to minimize intermodal conflicts, street crossings, and travel along high speed, high traffic streets. In addition to design features, education and enforcement can improve safety. "I am not willing to walk or ride a bike on the shoulder of a busy or slightly busy road, regardless of whether or not the shoulder is paved, because it is extremely dangerous due to vehicle driver distractions (talking and texting on phone)." "Major intersections can be nerve-racking for bicyclists." - - JANUARY 2019 - - - - - COMMUNITY INVOLVEMENT AGENDA ITEM # 9. b) CITY OF RENTON • RENTON TRAILS AND BICYCLE MASTER PLAN Connectivity "There is a lack of bike paths on the major roads that lead Connectivity to regional and to the most popular destinations. I prefer to bike, but it takes local destinations such as job longer than necessary because I find myself having to take centers, entertainment centers roundabout ways in order to stay safe." and transit, as well within "I would love to see our bike trails connect all around Seattle neighborhoods, is an important like the Sammamish Trail which connects to the Burke - feature of the network. Gilman, then down and around to the waterfront, to Alki, then back to Renton." "It is too difficult, and dangerous, to bicycle through Renton to connect to major trails leading north, south, and east (Lake Washington Trail, Rainer Ave, Green River Trail, Cedar River Trail." "The bike trail connection isn't the greatest when riding around Lake Washington and along 405. With the amount of hotels shopping parks in the area in North Renton it would be great to improve those connections to existing trails to the north for daily and recreational use." Continuity "I love the Cedar River Trail and ride it often from Continuity in the network downtown Renton to Maple Valley. However wish it were enables longer trips that are paved beyond Maple Valley - a road bike doesn't navigate useful for commuting or active well on gravel." recreation and a fluid "I commute from the Highlands to Kirkland. I'm an advanced experience. and confident road rider. Some wonderful improvements have been made to signage and other aspects of driving, but there is no safe way to go up to the Highlands from down in the valley by bike. I tend to go all the way around to Kennydale and climb that big hill to come back to the Highlands rather than risk Sunset." Comfort and Inclusivity "I think that all trails, walkways, paths, etc. should be This refers to the diversity of accessible to ALL." experiences the network will "I walk for health. I sold my bicycle a few years ago, and enable, reaching across a have never felt a need to get another one. I am retired, so broad range of activities, ages, do not need daily transportation." and abilities. "I want to bike and walk ... my car trips kill me literally and keep me isolated. I want an outdoor vibrant community." JANUARY 2019 COMMUNITY INVOLVEMENT AGENDA ITEM # 9. b) RENTON TRAILS AND BICYCLE MASTER PLAN • CITY OF RENTON Well -Maintained Trails wear out with time and need sufficient resources to conduct regular maintenance to offer a predictable, consistent experience for all users. Wayfinding and Awareness A comprehensive network of wayfinding signage elements tailored for walking and bicycling allows residents to easily navigate the network and make non -motorized and multi - modal trips. Innovative and Flexible Trail design optimizes for successful sharing of the network. Soft surface trails are a desired alternative to paved trails. "Surface maintenance is a MUST! Most importantly, keeping the shoulders trails clear of debris." "Safe, shared use is possible if ALL users are aware of and follow trail rules." "There needs to be better signage at all entrance points to the park and along walkways." "Make 2-person soft surface on both sides of national standard width trails so folks can run together." - - JANUARY 2019 - - - - - COMMUNITY INVOLVEMENT AGENDA ITEM # 9. b) CITY OF RENTON • RENTON TRAILS AND BICYCLE MASTER PLAN JANUARY 2019 AGENDA ITEM # 9. b) RENTON TRAILS AND BICYCLE MASTER PLAN • CITY OF RENTON THIS PAGE IS INTENTIONALLY BLANK AGENDA ITEM # 9. b) CITY OF RENTON • RENTON TRAILS AND BICYCLE MASTER PLAN 4 DEMAND & NEEDS ANALYSIS This Chapter reviews needs and trends including: ■ Walking and biking activities participation ■ Future growth and change ■ Level of traffic stress ■ Destinations such as transit, schools, and parks ■ Connection to the community's center and region Based on the needs and trends, gaps and opportunities are identified. The current and proposed system that closes gaps and addresses needs is benchmarked to peer communities. Level of service concepts are explored. Participation Walking and biking are important to Renton residents and visitors, and Renton's local activities match the similarly high participation in the region and state. Renton Mobility & Recreation Use & Performance Indicators Renton's parks and trail system attracts up to 2.5 million visitors each year. In the questionnaire for this Trails and Bicycle Master Plan, most respondents walk at least 2 times per week or more, and bike 1 day per week or less. At least 80% of the respondents walked or biked around the neighborhood, over two thirds walked on a trail and over three quarters biked on a trail. See Exhibit 4-1 and Appendix A. Exhibit 4-1. Questionnaire 2017 Walking and Biking Frequency Walking 65.6% Biking 38.7% Running 44% Source: City of Renton, 2017, BERK, 2018 JANUARY 2019 DEMAND & NEEDS ANALYSIS AGENDA ITEM # 9. b) RENTON TRAILS AND BICYCLE MASTER PLAN • CITY OF RENTON Renton monitors mobility and recreation performance indicators in its budget, and the 2017-2018 budget reported: ■ Increasing satisfaction with connectivity to local and regional centers via transit, sidewalks and trails from 52% in 2011 to 56% in 2015. ■ Relatively high but variable satisfaction with the level of trail connectivity and access at 74% to 83% during the 2012-2014 period. ■ Overall customer satisfaction ratings of good to excellent in cleanliness and appearance of Trail System, with 84%-93% satisfaction variably over the 2012-2015 period. State Trails Plan In 2017 a statistically valid participation rate survey across Washington found the top activity of all respondents consisted of walking in a park or trail setting at 84%. Participation equaled 89% considering the Seattle - King region alone. Walking was also the top activity at over 90% for families with or without children. State Comprehensive Outdoor Recreation Planning The 2017 State Comprehensive Outdoor Recreation Planning (SCORP) document considers participation in recreation activities across the state and in different regions. The report found the participation rates for walking was 94% statewide. Rates were 28% for biking mostly on streets and roads, and 23% for running (many locations). Across different ages, races, or incomes, the top recreation activity was consistently walking in a park or trail setting. About 89% of participants in the Seattle -King region participated in walking in a park or trail setting. Most participation locations occurred in a person's yard or neighborhood. Future Growth & Change Renton's current trail and bike routes serve several of the highest population and job density areas though there are gaps particularly in the northeast and southeast geographies. See Exhibit 4-2 and Exhibit 4-3 Dense population and job centers are associated with high -density residential and commercial/industrial zones. Over a 20-year planning period concluding in 2035, over 16,700 housing units and 31,000 jobs would be added per the Renton Comprehensive Plan. New residents and employees would increase demand for walking and biking. Much of the growth would occur in the high -density residential and commercial zones identified in Exhibit 4-4, particularly in the City Center. - JANUARY 2019 �' DEMAND & NEEDS ANALYSIS AGENDA ITEM # 9. b) CITY OF RENTON • RENTON TRAILS AND BICYCLE MASTER PLAN Exhibit 4-2. Population Density and Existing Network JANUARY 2019 DEMAND & NEEDS ANALYSIS AGENDA ITEM # 9. b) RENTON TRAILS AND BICYCLE MASTER PLAN • CITY OF RENTON Exhibit 4-3. Job Density and Existing Network t I • 1 MR lip.405 5 •sw 2,sw 515 1& Existing Trails Job Density Lower Job Density 0 0.5 1- Arr-1I1II� Miles - Sour<e. City of Renton, 2018; US Census 2015 -Higher Job Density JANUARY 2019 DEMAND & NEEDS ANALYSIS AGENDA ITEM # 9. b) CITY OF RENTON • RENTON TRAILS AND BICYCLE MASTER PLAN Exhibit 4-4. Existing Trail Access to High -Density Residential and Job Nodes .1 40 r 110 j�C�l. ��1r�✓� 9 Nip -i Ap lur :W� f .'S 1 5J 181 , Existing Trails Quarter Mile Service Area LTS (1 & 2) 0 0.s High Density Residential Sour<e. City of Renton, 2018 Commercial JANUARY 2019 DEMAND & NEEDS ANALYSIS AGENDA ITEM # 9. b) RENTON TRAILS AND BICYCLE MASTER PLAN • CITY OF RENTON Level of Traffic Stress Bicycle systems that provide low traffic stress and high connectivity attract wider usage: ...a bicycling network to attract the widest possible segment of the population, its most fundamental attribute should be low -stress connectivity, that is, providing routes between people's origins and destinations that do not require cyclists to use links that exceed their tolerance for traffic stress, and that do not involve an undue level of detour. (Mineta Transportation Institute, 20 7 2) Renton has some low stress routes usable by most adults and children. These are in Kennydale, Cedar River, and the Valley. Most of the community does not have low stress facilities within 114 mile. See Exhibit 4-5 and Exhibit 4-6. Exhibit 4-5. Level of Traffic Stress Continuum fi.ng f r ransporWtion Source: City of Renton, 2018: BERK, 2018. - - - JANUARY 20I9 •' - - DEMAND & NEEDS ANALYSIS CITY OF RENTON • RENTON TRAILS AND BICYCLE MASTER PLAN AGENDA ITEM # 9. b) Exhibit 4-6. Level of Traffic Stress and Existing Network Z. L 0 0.5 1 Miles Source. City of Renton, 2018 JANUARY 2019 DEMAND & NEEDS ANALYSIS Eli 40 Level of Traffic Stress (LTS) LTS (1 & 2) LTS (3 & 4) Quarter Mile Service Area LTS (1 & 2) OCommunity Center 4 Library O Potential Transit Hub ® School AGENDA ITEM # 9. b) RENTON TRAILS AND BICYCLE MASTER PLAN • CITY OF RENTON Schools Renton is served by the Renton School District, Issaquah School District, and Kent School District. There are numerous private school throughout the City. The Renton School District serves most of the Renton city limits. The district has 15 elementary schools, 4 middle schools, and 4 high schools. Renton's 2017 Trails and Bicycle Questionnaire found that children walk to a large list of local schools (1 2 schools), and to a lesser extent bike to them (6 schools). See Appendix A. Renton has a sidewalk rehabilitation and replacement program targeting places where curb, gutter, sidewalks, and curb ramps are needed. Many of the schools in the district identify "walk to school" route options, and improvements within those areas would benefit children and families. Parks & Recreation Facilities Renton's parks and recreation facilities include 32 developed public parks, 965 acres of public open space, an 1 8-hole public golf course, two lake- front beaches and a public boat launch. Many parks and recreation facilities are accessed along the Cedar River Trail and Springbrook Trail, as well as bike lanes and shared roadways. Pedestrian trails also connect to and through parks and recreation facilities. However, parks and recreation facilities are not fully connected by the trails and bicycle system. See Exhibit 4-7. - - - JANUARY 2019 �' DEMAND & NEEDS ANALYSIS AGENDA ITEM # 9. b) CITY OF RENTON • RENTON TRAILS AND BICYCLE MASTER PLAN Exhibit 4-7. Parks and Recreation and Existing Network 69 JANUARY 2019 DEMAND & NEEDS ANALYSIS AGENDA ITEM # 9. b) RENTON TRAILS AND BICYCLE MASTER PLAN • CITY OF RENTON Transit Dependent Populations Renton's City Center and Valley planning areas have the most frequent bus service. The Highlands and Benson neighborhoods have a few all -day routes. Other areas have less frequent service and sparser coverage of transit. The trail and bicycle network to transit facilities is discontinuous in areas outside the City Center. Areas with larger proportions of the elderly, the young, low-income individuals, and households without access to a car are often considered transit dependent. The first and last mile problem, one of the most complex challenges for public transit, refers to the beginning and end of a trip primarily made by public transit. Renton's Trails and Bicycle Questionnaire responses indicate that Renton residents use bicycles or walk to make short, local trips typically associated with the first and last mile problem. See Appendix A. Improving walking and biking infrastructure to appeal to a broad and diverse range of people — elderly, young, low income — can potentially help solve the first and last mile problem and thereby make it easier for more people to access transit. This would benefit one-third of the community that are younger than 18 and older than 65 years. See Exhibit 2-3 in Chapter 2. Those earning less than or equal to 80% of the area median income are concentrated in the City Center, Valley, Benson, and Highlands areas. See Exhibit 4-8. - JANUARY 20I9 •' - - DEMAND & NEEDS ANALYSIS AGENDA ITEM # 9. b) CITY OF RENTON ♦ RENTON TRAILS AND BICYCLE MASTER PLAN Exhibit 4-8. Low Income Census Tracts and Existing Network �t 10 900 405 1515 I8J Existing Trails Low Income Tracts - (< 80% Metro Area Median Income) 0 0.5 = Non -Low Income Tracts Hale: (> 80% Metro Area Source . City of Renton, 2018; US Census, 2016 Median Income) JANUARY 2019 DEMAND & NEEDS ANALYSIS AGENDA ITEM # 9. b) RENTON TRAILS AND BICYCLE MASTER PLAN • CITY OF RENTON Equity — Puget Sound Regional Council Opportunity Index The Puget Sound Regional Council (PSRC) has evaluated areas that provide access to opportunities — education, economic, housing, transportation, and health/environment. The current trail and bicycle network contribute to opportunities and access for persons of color, and diverse age groups in the City Center, Valley, and a few other Community Planning Areas. The existing network is sparser in areas of lesser opportunity in Benson, Highlands, and West Hill. Opportunity maps illustrate where opportunity -rich communities exist, assess who has access to those neighborhoods, and help to understand what needs to be remedied in opportunity -poor neighborhoods. Exhibit 4-9 displays the current trail and bicycle network against the latest PSRC Opportunity Index map. This map is a graphical representation of how this plan analyzed demand and need with an equity lens. - JANUARY 20I9 •' - - DEMAND & NEEDS ANALYSIS AGENDA ITEM # 9. b) CITY OF RENTON • RENTON TRAILS AND BICYCLE MASTER PLAN Exhibit 4-9. PSRC Opportunity Index and Existing Network JANUARY 2019 DEMAND & NEEDS ANALYSIS AGENDA ITEM # 9. b) RENTON TRAILS AND BICYCLE MASTER PLAN • CITY OF RENTON City Center and Regional Trails City Center Plan, Makers 2011 City Center Renton's City Center Planning Area contains the historic core of the community. It is a regional center for manufacturing and service jobs, and increasingly a mixed -use residential neighborhood offering cultural and commercial amenities. Many roads and regional trails converge in this hub. The Renton Library, City Hall, and other government facilities serve the community. Regional parks and trails provide gathering places and access to the Cedar River and other open spaces. Renton adopted a City Center Community Plan to guide the future growth and direction of the center. City Center Community Plan goals include increasing transportation connections for multiple modes, improving trail connections and reaching more destinations, and making civic amenities more accessible. Since the City Center is a multimodal crossroads to other neighborhoods, meeting City Center goals will also advance this Trails and Bicycle Master Plan. Goal 5: Provide better regional transportation connections for a range of transportation modes to improve access to and from the City Center. Goal 6: Provide better internal connections between areas within the City Center, especially Coulon ParklLake Washington, The Landing, North Renton neighborhood, Downtown, and the South Renton neighborhood. Goal 7: Connect regional trails in the City Center and build on these key connections as an economic development strategy. Goal 8: Protect and enhance the natural features and open space in the City Center and improve public access to and connections between the Lake Washington shoreline, the Cedar River, and the variety of parks and open spaces throughout the City Center. The City Center is designated in part a Regional Growth Center and is also slated to take most of Renton's residential and commercial growth in the next 20 years. Today, single -occupancy vehicles comprise 82% of trips in the City Center. The City's goal is to decrease drive alone work trips to below 75%. Improving opportunities to bike and walk to and through the City Center will help meet the needs of residents and employees across the Renton planning area. — — — JANUARY 2019 DEMAND & NEEDS ANALYSIS AGENDA ITEM # 9. b) CITY OF RENTON • RENTON TRAILS AND BICYCLE MASTER PLAN Regional Trails Regional trails in Renton include the Cedar River Trail, Soos Creek Trail, Lake to Sound Trail, and soon the Eastside Rail Corridor and the Lake to Sound Trail. When complete the Eastside Rail Corridor will provide 16.7 miles of new trail that will connect the cities of Renton, Bellevue, Kirkland, Redmond, and Woodinville. The Lake to Sound Trail, when completed by King County, will be a continuous 16-mile non -motorized, multi -use recreational trail from the south end of Lake Washington in Renton to the Puget Sound in Des Moines, connecting the cities of Renton, Tukwila, Sea-Tac, Burien, and Des Moines. King County has also planned other regional trail extensions with the Soos Creek Trail with the future goal of connection to the Cedar River Trail. See Chapter 5 for additional information on increases in Regional Trail miles. GAPS & OPPORTUNITIES Renton considered the gap analysis and community comments to identify opportunities to create a more connected system with capacity for current and future use. This plan encourages higher participation rates in walking and biking by better connecting users to destinations, reducing traffic stress, and anticipating greater demand from new housing and job growth: ■ The network increases the extent of facilities in both high population and high job density. See Exhibit 4-10 and Exhibit 4-1 1. ■ Nearly every gap is filled with a connecting route meeting LTS 1 or 2 criteria. See Exhibit 4-12. ■ The future network knits together all Community Planning Areas including those of low opportunity. See Exhibit 4-1 3. JANUARY 2019 DEMAND & NEEDS ANALYSIS AGENDA ITEM # 9. b) RENTON TRAILS AND BICYCLE MASTER PLAN • CITY OF RENTON Exhibit 4-10. Population Density and Proposed Network 0 JANUARY 2019 DEMAND & NEEDS ANALYSIS AGENDA ITEM # 9. b) CITY OF RENTON • RENTON TRAILS AND BICYCLE MASTER PLAN Exhibit 4-1 1. Job Density and Proposed Network 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 w ' 1■ 1 — -- 1 A♦ IE _ - ,-• Ins s N 4fhlSf � — — ^� 3rd sd ' r♦ 1 ' 1 1 1- � � � 5 7fh St ♦ � � 1 � 1 1 1 v,oV 1 Good 1 1 / SW 161h S1 If• I 11 1 1 1 900 pl SW %ih St �6 1 -15 Existing Trails Proposed Trails Job � SW 4fh St a� 1 Ian � ♦� g0 1 I I 1 1 I' 1 DensityLower b Density 0 0.5 Source City of Renton, 2018; US Census 2015 igher Jolb�. JANUARY 2019 DEMAND & NEEDS ANALYSIS AGENDA ITEM # 9. b) RENTON TRAILS AND BICYCLE MASTER PLAN • CITY OF RENTON Exhibit 4-12. Level of Traffic Stress with '/a Mile Service Area and Proposed Network '/a Mile Service Area LTS 1 & 2 o os 1 ail Miles S..— City of PeM-, 2018 0 A N d r — �r Level of Traffic Stress (LTS) LTS (1 & 2 ) LTS (3 & 4) Quarter Mile Service Area LTS (1 & 2) Community Center Library OPotential Transit Hub ® School JANUARY 2019 DEMAND & NEEDS ANALYSIS AGENDA ITEM # 9. b) CITY OF RENTON • RENTON TRAILS AND BICYCLE MASTER PLAN Exhibit 4-13. PSRC Opportunity Index and Proposed Network d � Z a' a o' � I r POM a al a a N 4ih6t o N 3rd a � r \ o i = SW 7th St /S 7th St / S� Gr•d W SW 16th St 3 a G SW 34 -■ , SW 41st St I SW 43rd St i t r r r 79 JANUARY 2019 DEMAND & NEEDS ANALYSIS AGENDA ITEM # 9. b) RENTON TRAILS AND BICYCLE MASTER PLAN • CITY OF RENTON BENCHMARKS Benchmarking compares Renton's trail miles to other agencies to assess Renton's performance relative to peer communities. Renton has the lowest miles per 1,000 population compared to surrounding communities and other major cities in south and east King County. See Exhibit 4-14. If only implementing the Highest Priority projects (Tier 1) in Chapter 5, the City's network will be in the middle of benchmark communities and increase its system length by over 65%. Exhibit 4-14. Miles of Trails per 1,000 Population — Renton and Peers Source: City of Renton, 2018. - JANUARY 2019 DEMAND & NEEDS ANALYSIS AGENDA ITEM # 9. b) CITY OF RENTON • RENTON TRAILS AND BICYCLE MASTER PLAN LEVEL OF SERVICE A "level of service" (LOS) refers to the amount and quality of trails and bicycle facilities that are necessary to meet current and future needs. A LOS helps establish a capital facility program. Costs and revenue can then be matched, and projects phased to help achieve the planned LOS. LOS policies or standards are locally established and up to each community to set. Levels of service are often related to a unit of population, e.g. miles of trail per 1,000 population. In addition to quantity -based LOS measures, communities often consider quality and extent (distribution). This Plan is designed to meet the following three LOS criteria: 1. Level of Service — Quantity: Increase the miles of trails per 1,000 persons. See Exhibit 4-15. Exhibit 4-15. Miles of Trails per 1,000 (2018 — 2035) The Plan will increase miles of trails per 1,000 residents in Renton from its current level of 0.29 miles/1,000 residents in 2018 to 0.44 miles/1,000 residents with the implementation of all highest priority projects and to 0.95 miles/1,000 residents with the implementation of all proposed projects by 2035. Source: City of Renton, 2018. JANUARY 2019 DEMAND & NEEDS ANALYSIS - - - - - ' . AGENDA ITEM # 9. b) RENTON TRAILS AND BICYCLE MASTER PLAN • CITY OF RENTON 2. Level of Service — Quality: Increase the extent of LTS 1 and LTS 2 facilities to increase user comfort and participation. See Exhibit 4-16. Exhibit 4-16. Change LTS 1 &2 Trail Miles The Plan will increase the total LTS 1 & 2 trail miles in Renton from 23.3 in 2018 to 1 13 in 2035 by adding 92.8 miles of new LTS 1 & 2 trails. ElEiklstir[p. ;1! pwpowd Source: City of Renton, BERK, 2018. 3. Level of Service — Connectivity and Extent (Distribution): a. Reduce gaps and increase the coverage of facilities across all Renton community planning areas. See Exhibit 4-17. b. Increase the share of residents and employees within a quarter mile service area of LTS 1 & 2 facilities. See Exhibit 4-1 8. Exhibit 4-17. Existing and Proposed Trail Miles by Community Planning Area Source: City of Renton, BERK, 2018. - JANUARY2019 - - - DEMAND & NEEDS ANALYSIS AGENDA ITEM # 9. b) CITY OF RENTON • RENTON TRAILS AND BICYCLE MASTER PLAN Exhibit 4-18. Percentage of Renton Residents within a Quarter Mile Service Area of LTS 1 & 2 Facilities Source: City of Renton, BERK, 2018. JANUARY 2019 DEMAND & NEEDS ANALYSIS - - - - - ' . AGENDA ITEM # 9. b) RENTON TRAILS AND BICYCLE MASTER PLAN • CITY OF RENTON - JANUARY 20I9 �' - - DEMAND & NEEDS ANALYSIS AGENDA ITEM # 9. b) CITY OF RENTON • RENTON TRAILS AND BICYCLE MASTER PLAN JANUARY 2019 AGENDA ITEM # 9. b) RENTON TRAILS AND BICYCLE MASTER PLAN • CITY OF RENTON THIS PAGE IS INTENTIONALLY BLANK AGENDA ITEM # 9. b) CITY OF RENTON • RENTON TRAILS AND BICYCLE MASTER PLAN 5 TRAIL & BICYCLE SYSTEM PLAN GUIDING PRINCIPLES Based on Chapter 1 Goals and Objectives, Chapter 3 Community Involvement results, and Chapter 4 Demand and Needs Analysis, following are guiding principles of the Trail and Bicycle System. The Guiding Principles are ideas that influenced the proposed network recommendations, design guidelines, and projects and priorities. Characteristics Renton's Trail and Bicycle System will be: 1 . Accessible, Connected to Destinations, and Continuous 2. Safe, Comfortable, and Inclusive 3. Easy to Navigate 4. Innovative and Flexible Benefits An improved Trail and Bicycle System will have positive effects for Renton's community by: 1. Achieving Equity 2. Increasing Awareness 3. Promoting Physical and Environmental Health 4. Enhancing the Economy and Community JANUARY 2019 TRAIL & BICYCLE SYSTEM PLAN - - - - - ' . AGENDA ITEM # 9. b) RENTON TRAILS AND BICYCLE MASTER PLAN • CITY OF RENTON NETWORK RECOMMENDATIONS Renton's Trail and Bicycle System is one integrated system that will be expanded from about 30 miles to 127 miles within the city limits. This includes approximately 4 miles of existing trail facilities being upgraded or converted to different facility types. See Exhibit 5-1 . Another 8 miles of new, proposed trails are planned in areas immediately outside of Renton's city limits for an overall plan total of 135 miles. Exhibit 5-1. Existing and Proposed Trail Miles Source: City of Renton, 201 8; BERK, 2018. The Trail and Bicycle System features a regional hub connecting in the Downtown Urban Center, and an expanded local network. Regional trails connect Renton to other cities and regional destinations that lie to the north, east, south, and west. Local Connector routes tie together multiple Renton neighborhoods to one another and carry more non -motorized trips. Local Neighborhood routes connect destinations within the some neighborhood. - - JANUARY 2019 - - - TRAIL & BICYCLE SYSTEM PLAN CITY OF RENTON • RENTON TRAILS AND BICYCLE MASTER PLAN AGENDA ITEM # 9. b) Exhibit 5-2. Regional and Local System Map fAf I a� 0 1 Miles Source . city cidon, 2018 M �i� da A If EL IC 909 Trail Hierarchy Regional Local Connector Local Neighborhood Existing Trails Proposed Trail Community Center AA Library OPotential Transit Hub ® School - Parks & Open Space JANUARY 2019 TRAIL & BICYCLE SYSTEM PLAN 89 AGENDA ITEM # 9. b) RENTON TRAILS AND BICYCLE MASTER PLAN • CITY OF RENTON Regional With the proposed network, regional trail miles will double in Renton under the Plan from approximately 9.2 miles today to 19.1 by 2035. Exhibit 5-3. Existing and Proposed Regional Trail Miles ■ Exbting ■ Proposed Source: City of Renton, 2018, BERK, 2018 Renton's Downtown Urban Center will become a hub where several regional trail connections that come together all linked to the Cedar River Trail. ■ The Eastside Rail Corridor will connect from the Cedar River Trail via the Renton Connector or Houser Way Bypass north towards Bellevue. ■ The Lake to Sound Trail will connect to the Cedar River Trail to the east and to the Green River Trail to the west. ■ The Lake Washington Loop Trail would connect from the Cedar River northwest along Lake Washington Blvd to Seattle. A series of trail alternatives were reviewed with King County and the City of Renton staff. See Exhibit 5-4. Based on the meetings with King County, concepts were developed for Preferred Lake to Sound and Eastside Rail Corridor routes. See Appendix B for preferred concepts and intersection improvements. Other regional trail improvements include the 1.2-mile Soos Creek Trail extension from SE 192nd St to Petrovitsky Road, considered a high priority programmed project in the King County Regional Trails Need Report and the 2014 - 2019 Capital Improvement Program. Other segments including the Petrovitsky Crossing, Renton Park Segment, and the Lindberg to Cedar River Trail, are considered programmed and identified as a Tier 3 priority. (King County, 2016) - JANUARY 2019 �' - - TRAIL & BICYCLE SYSTEM PLAN AGENDA ITEM # 9. b) CITY OF RENTON • RENTON TRAILS AND BICYCLE MASTER PLAN Exhibit 5-4. Regional Trail Alternatives Regional Trail Alternatives - Overall Network �r LEGEND Walrg7te11 e Ia(prefermd) *t. & 1•-�••�-•r—+ �i Thy Fe dffd. Aa1 C•niderr �i A �.. e•e e�•e� R.Wn.tl Rl Wrn�ur. Trall • (BASF Reu eorridpr rAered •. d. - .. ure hn.ma,h v:lh_"If .:•�y f....... ..... i Ahnrune Trd 1~ � IMdwrrl..<INy hail glb 4•• .. .... a rulflyyW •!'! —Idde [oil Corridor. R GI15rd LrWitwctlwr •� � ¢noted u.e froA lrt lnRe •� Wathingrpn ANd ROWI 3b •' Lwaad.xencerdder.- ... ••Y p,ppen Avenue ft th 3a - •lja mh d_"fl! �� fashlde RaftGeMdew. •? � �♦ 'r ha'ed wehaifJ •� •a•a •O •V y d4 - •� ISUafade RoRCo fnl 4••....••dd.AvuK.HASW.P elh tld•.allnk • Ir rcrs.cxcn BumetrT+ail �_ f (prererred) t.k. fD S.-d W. Lgm.nl0 L0. fa U µTd I.H.- pR n-W h-ReR in ANSI ROLM 9epme nl A' Ylvrm.d 42. 1.) a• eke fn —m RorL cr`��rarVa, i/ �, lHorwr Wbr 5. a*+ 1 ! nrerf ,��� ,••aket::::n: T+•raaa ..................r..2..............',.....•'�W"f �vU Lalu F. ueund rr•R jBu ff A CITY OF RENTON 1RUL5. e1CTCIF — Source: MacLeod Reckord, 2017; City of Renton, 2017. 0019000 91 JANUARY 2019 TRAIL & BICYCLE SYSTEM PLAN AGENDA ITEM # 9. b) RENTON TRAILS AND BICYCLE MASTER PLAN • CITY OF RENTON Local Connector & Local Neighborhood Community outreach results showed high participation in walking and biking in and around neighborhoods, and a desire to connect to the broader trail and bicycle network. The proposed network focuses on increasing and expanding the local network. Completing all proposed projects in the plan will increase Local Neighborhood miles by 475% and Local Connector miles by 41 2% and better connect local neighborhoods to the Regional trail network. See Exhibit 5-5 and Exhibit 5-6. Exhibit 5-5. Regional and Local Trail Miles — Existing and Proposed Source: City of Renton, 2018, BERK, 2018 Exhibit 5-6. Regional and Local Trail Miles — Total Proposed Network Source: City of Renton, 2018, BERK, 2018 42 _ ram----------------------- _ - - - JANUARY 2019 TRAIL & BICYCLE SYSTEM PLAN AGENDA ITEM # 9. b) CITY OF RENTON • RENTON TRAILS AND BICYCLE MASTER PLAN TRAIL & BICYCLE FACILITY CHARACTERISTICS Roadway Characterisitcs & Trail & Bicycle Options Renton's unified trail system is made up of different facilities meant to reduce level of stress given traffic volumes, speed, and number of lanes in each direction. Shared Use Paths are separated from roadways and have the most flexible use and are often implemented with Regional or Local - Connector facilities. Bicycle lanes may be protected, buffered, or striped on Local -Connector facilities. Local Neighborhood routes feature lower volume traffic and a range of Shared Roadways, Buffered Lanes, Neighborhood Greenways, or Soft Surface Trails. See Exhibit 5-7. Exhibit 5-7. Facility Options by Roadway Characteristics * LTS 2 maybe achieved with protected bike lanes if traffic volumes are less than 10,000-15,000. Source: City of Renton, 2018. JANUARY 2019 TRAIL & BICYCLE SYSTEM PLAN ----------------------- AGENDA ITEM # 9. b) RENTON TRAILS AND BICYCLE MASTER PLAN • CITY OF RENTON This Trails and Bicycle Plan will increase the miles of each trail type with an emphasis on Shared Use Paths that offer the most comfort and safety for all non -motorized modes. All other trail types will increase from present numbers. See Exhibit 5-8. Each trail and bicycle facility type is described in the following section with typical features and design considerations. Exhibit 5-8. Existing and Proposed Network by Facility Type (Miles and Percent) FACILITY Shared Use Path EXISTING 7.67 PROPOSED 40.03 EXISTING 25% PROPOSED 31 % Protected Bike Lane - 3.05 - 2% Protected Bike Lane - 0.39 - < 1 % Two -Way Protected Bike Lane - 2.66 - 2% Striped Bike Lane 9.70 32.03 32% 25% Striped Bike Lane 9.70 31.24 32% 24% Buffered Bike Lane - 0.79 - 1 % Neighborhood Greenway - 22.82 - 18% Signed Shared Roadway 2.47 10.31 8% 8% Pedestrian Trail 10.36 19.58 34% 15% Boardwalk 0.26 3.96 1 % 3% Hard Surface Trail 6.32 5.62 21 % 4% Soft Surface Trail 3.79 9.99 13% 8% Notes: Proposed trails include conversion of 4.34 miles of existing facilities to new facility types. Source: City of Renton, 2018. - - - JANUARY 2019 •' - - TRAIL & BICYCLE SYSTEM PLAN AGENDA ITEM # 9. b) CITY OF RENTON • RENTON TRAILS AND BICYCLE MASTER PLAN Low -Stress Network The City of Renton can select the facility type that most increases user comfort where feasible with local conditions. By increasing comfort and offering more buffered or protected facilities, there could be increased non -motorized facility usage. The Trails and Bicycle Plan increases the miles of trail and bicycle facilities that are suited for all or most users — LTS 1 and LTS 2. See Exhibit 5-9. These include facilities such as separated Shared Use Paths, Protected and Buffered Bike Lanes, and others. For a variety of reasons —physical conditions, design considerations, partner requirements, funding, and others — LTS 1 and 2 facilities are not feasible everywhere. When fully implemented, the plan increases LTS 1 & 2 facility miles from 23.34 to 1 12.97 miles, an increase of 398%. Additionally, the plan increases LTS 3 & 4 facility miles from 6.86 to 14.84 miles, an increase of 1 33%. Overall, the plan increases the ratio of LTS 1 & 2 miles to LTS 3 & 4. See Exhibit 5-9. Exhibit 5-9. Existing and Proposed Trails by LTS Rating (Miles and Percent) Existing 30.20 23.34 6.86 77% 23% Proposed 127.81 112.97 14.84 88% 12% Source: City of Renton, 2018. JANUARY 2019 TRAIL & BICYCLE SYSTEM PLAN AGENDA ITEM # 9. b) RENTON TRAILS AND BICYCLE MASTER PLAN • CITY OF RENTON SHARED USE PATH A shared -use path is physically separated from traffic by open space or a barrier and allows for two-way travel. A shared -use path can be used by bicyclists, pedestrians, skaters, wheelchair users, joggers, and other non - motorized users. Some common locations for shared -use paths are along rivers, streams, utility rights of way, and abandoned railroad rights of way and between parks as well as within existing roadway corridors. Example: Cedar River Trail. For the purposes of this plan, the Shared -Use Path standard measurements were used. Physical and financial cost constraints may lead to considering Side Paths, which separation and width would not be ideal. Regional Shared Use Paths, like the Cedar River Trail, were the most used by bicyclists and second -most used locations by walkers per questionnaire results. Route locations along natural areas and separated routes were particularly used and desired by off -road bicycle users such as mountain bikers, BMX users, and Cyclocross users as preferred locations in the questionnaire. See Chapter 3. The Washington State Department of Transportation's Design Manual suggests: When designing shared -use paths, the bicyclist may not be the critical design user for every element of design. For example, the crossing speeds of most intersections between roads and pathways should be designed for pedestrians, as they are the slowest users. Accommodate all intended users and minimize conflicts. Exhibit 5-10. Shared -Use Path Shared Use Path ■ Facility physically separated from traffic by open space or a barrier. ■ May be in the right-of-way or independent right-of- way. ■ 2-way travel. ■ May be used by bicyclists, pedestrians, skaters, wheelchair users, joggers, and other non -motorized users. ■ Width: O 10' minimum O 12' preferred + 2' shoulder on each side = 14' or 16' total ■ 5' minimum separated from roadway. ■ Surfacing varies. Renton, 2009; WSDOT Manual Chapter 1515 - - - JANUARY 2019 �' TRAIL & BICYCLE SYSTEM PLAN CITY OF RENTON • RENTON TRAILS AND BICYCLE MASTER PLAN AGENDA ITEM # 9. b) PROTECTED BIKE LANE A protected bike lane combines the user experience of a multi -use trail with a conventional bike lane. They provide space that is used for bicycles and are separated from motor vehicle travel lanes, parking lanes and sidewalks. Two-way protected bike lanes are physically separated cycle tracks that allow bicycle movement in both directions on one side of the road. This facility type will be newly implemented in the city and planning area. Exhibit 5-1 1. Protected Bike Lane ■ Configured as a protected cycle track —at street level with a parking lane or other barrier between the cycle track and the motor vehicle travel lane —and/or as a raised cycle track to provide vertical separation from the adjacent motor vehicle lane. ■ Require additional considerations at driveway and side - street crossings. ■ One-way lane width varies from 5-8 feet exclusive of the barrier. WSDOT Design Manual Exhibit 1520-1 1 AASHTO Bike Guide Two-Way Protected Bike Lane JANUARY 2019 TRAIL & BICYCLE SYSTEM PLAN---------------------------- AGENDA ITEM # 9. b) RENTON TRAILS AND BICYCLE MASTER PLAN • CITY OF RENTON BUFFERED BIKE LANE Buffered bike lanes are conventional bicycle lanes paired with a designated buffer space separating the bicycle lane from the adjacent motor vehicle travel lane and/or parking lane. The City does not yet have an example of a buffered bike lane. Exhibit 5-12. Buffered Bike Lane ■ Separated buffered bike lanes are at grade with the roadway, and they include a bike lane and a buffer area. ■ Buffer: Consider a 3-foot buffer strip whenever possible. Minimum width is 2 feet. ■ Bike Lane Width: 3 feet to 7 feet. o Minimum: 3 feet. o Recommended: 5 feet to enable passing maneuvers between cyclists o Increased: High cyclist volume locations should consider more width to facilitate mobility performance for this mode. WSDOT Design Manual: 1520.02(3) Buffered Bike Lane - - JANUARY 2019 TRAIL & BICYCLE SYSTEM PLAN CITY OF RENTON • RENTON TRAILS AND BICYCLE MASTER PLAN AGENDA ITEM # 9. b) STRIPED BIKE LANE The striped bicycle lane accommodates cyclists in a designated striped lane that is typically 5-feet wide. Example: Duvall Avenue NE, north of NE 4th Street Exhibit 5-13. Striped Bike Lane Bike Lane Shared Lane DownlBike Lane Up ■ 1-way facilities traveling in the direction of traffic, usually on both sides of roadway. ■ Exclusive use by bicyclists. ■ Width: 5' minimum to curb face or guardrail, 4' minimum without curb and gutter. ■ Lane and Parking Area Combined Width: 13 feet without curb face. 14 feet with a curb face. ■ Paved surface denoted with pavement markings: O 4" or 6" solid white line demarcating bike lane, bicycle lane symbol. O 4" solid white line demarcating parking area Bike lane symbol (6' high) and directional arrows should be painted on the far side of each intersection. Renton, 2009 JANUARY 2019 TRAIL & BICYCLE SYSTEM PLAN ---------------------------- AGENDA ITEM # 9. b) RENTON TRAILS AND BICYCLE MASTER PLAN • CITY OF RENTON NEIGHBORHOOD GREENWAY Neighborhood greenways are safer, calm residential streets. Neighborhood greenways are a large component of added trail and bicycle miles in the City Planning Areas, though no examples exist presently. Exhibit 5-14. Neighborhood Greenway ■ Typically, residential streets that parallel an arterial route providing a "lower stress" option.Low vehicle volumes and speeds through traffic calming treatments. ■ Safe and convenient crossings of arterial streets. ■ Signs and pavement markings. ■ Could include storm water facilities (low -impact development facilities). Neighborhood Greenway - - - JANUARY 2019 •' - - TRAIL & BICYCLE SYSTEM PLAN CITY OF RENTON • RENTON TRAILS AND BICYCLE MASTER PLAN AGENDA ITEM # 9. b) SIGNED SHARED ROADWAY When right-of-way widths and existing roadway conditions prohibit the addition of dedicated bicycle facilities, a roadway can be designated for shared use by motorists and bicyclists. Typically, this design solution is used on roadways with low traffic speeds and low levels of traffic or with wide curb lanes (i.e. 14 feet minimum). Signed shared roadways may provide a safer alternative to travel on busier parallel routes; direct cyclists toward particular destinations, such as parks, schools, shopping areas; or may serve as a link between discontinuous segments of dedicated bicycle facilities. Because signed shared roadways are often local streets, they may not necessarily be the most direct route. Ideally, signed shared roadways give bicyclists more priority in traffic maneuvers. Example: 1 7 6th Ave SE Exhibit 5-15. Signed Shared Roadway Signed Shared Roadway ■ Bicyclists share roadway with motorists for safety, wayfinding, or other purposes ■ No change to roadway configuration required, though routes are often designated with signage and other measures to give bicyclists priority or enhance their safety and comfort ■ Usually on lower volume, speed roadways/local streets. ■ Signage: every 1/a mile, or at every turn Renton, 2009 ------------------------------- tot JANUARY 2019 TRAIL & BICYCLE SYSTEM PLAN ----------------------- AGENDA ITEM # 9. b) RENTON TRAILS AND BICYCLE MASTER PLAN • CITY OF RENTON PEDESTRIAN TRAILS Pedestrian trails are dedicated facilities made of a variety of surfaces depending on environmental sensitivity and usage levels. Hard -surface trails can require less maintenance and accommodate more frequent use but are more expensive to construct and may not be sited where there are critical areas. Soft -surface trails can cost less when constructed but are typically not suited for heavy use and may require more maintenance. Boardwalks may be appropriate in wetlands or over water bodies. Exhibit 5-16. Pedestrian Trails Boardwalk Hard Surface Trail Soft Surface Trail Boardwalks Boardwalks are used to span unavoidable wet areas or depressions. It allows adequate drainage and impacts the fragile ecosystem less than other surface types. Example: Springbrook Trail south of SW 27th Street Hard Surface Trails Trails surfaced with asphalt, concrete, crushed stone, soil cement, or other pervious materials. Example: Thomas Teasdale to Cascade Park Trail Soft Surface Trail Trails surfaced with earth, woodchips, or other similar natural and pervious materials. Example: May Creek Trail ------------------------ - JANUARY 2019 �' - - TRAIL & BICYCLE SYSTEM PLAN CITY OF RENTON • RENTON TRAILS AND BICYCLE MASTER PLAN AGENDA ITEM # 9. b) FACILITY DESIGN GUIDELINES Intersection & Trail Crossing Guidelines Well -designed intersections and trail crossings are essential in creating a continuous trail and bicycle system that encourages walking and biking. There are limited pedestrian bridges and pedestrians must cross lanes of travel at intersections; bicyclists are often in the flow of vehicular travel between and at intersections. Separated trails like shared use paths may cross streets. See guidelines for different types of crossings below. Pedestrians at Intersections These intersections, where the paths of people and vehicles come together, can be the most challenging part of negotiating a pedestrian network. If pedestrians cannot cross the street safely, then mobility is severely limited, access is denied, and walking as a mode of travel is discouraged. (FHWA, Undated) Ensuring pedestrian safety and comfort follows these design principles: ■ Make pedestrians as visible as possible. ■ Make pedestrian actions as predictable as possible. ■ Slow vehicular traffic, particularly in central business districts or similar areas. (FHWA, Undated) Treatments at intersections include curb bulbs, curb ramps, signalization, crosswalks, pedestrian refuge islands. Bicyclists The principle objective when designing intersections for bicycle mobility and safety performance is to provide a visible, distinct, predictable, and clearly designated path leading to and through the intersection while managing potential conflicts between all other users and cyclists. (WSDOT Design Manual 2015) The National Association of City Transportation Officials (NACTO) suggests several methods for increasing bicyclists' comfort and reducing the risk of crashes: Bike Box A bike box is a designated area at the head of a traffic lane at a signalized intersection that provides bicyclists with a safe and visible way to get ahead of queuing traffic during the red signal phase. Crossing Markings Intersection crossing markings guide bicyclists on a safe and direct path through intersections, including driveways and ramps. Through Bicycle Lane Allows bicyclists an opportunity to position themselves to avoid conflicts with turning vehicles at an intersection. Source: NACTO JANUARY 2019 TRAIL & BICYCLE SYSTEM PLAN AGENDA ITEM # 9. b) RENTON TRAILS AND BICYCLE MASTER PLAN • CITY OF RENTON Transit as part of a Mobility Ecosystem King County Metro customers will soon be able to use new mobile apps to hail an on - demand shuttle to and from transit hubs throughout the region, starting at the county's largest park -and - ride.... Metro is creating a mobility ecosystem with transit at the center, moving large numbers of people over longer distances and along the busiest corridors in King County. (King County Metro, October 2018) Transit Integration Prioritizing bicycle routes to transit stops and stations, reducing traffic, and improving bicycle and transit integration (bike parking, bikes on -board capacity) is essential to getting transit customers out of their cars and on a bicycle for the first or last mile of travel. (American Public Transportation Association, September 2018) Bike Sharing Bike share stations can be co -located with transit stops to form mobility hubs. Wayfinding Bicycle wayfinding signage should be used to guide bicyclists to transit stops, especially for rapid services and other transit lines with significance for long trips. NACTO ■ Designs should heighten the level of visibility, denoting a clear right- of-way, and facilitating eye contact and awareness with competing modes. ■ Intersection treatments can resolve both queuing and merging maneuvers for bicyclists and are often coordinated with timed or specialized signals. ■ The configuration of a safe intersection for bicyclists may include elements such as color, signage, medians, signal detection, and pavement markings. See the sidebar for several design options. More options and details can be found in the WSDOT Design Manual 2015 and the NACTO Urban Bikeway Design Guide, Second Edition, 2014, and others. Trail Crossings Clearly define who has the right of way and provide sight distance for all users at shared use path and roadway intersections. (WSDOT Design Manual 2015) Two types of trail crossings are common: ■ Mid -block — preferably placed perpendicular to a road and with traffic right of way assignments; traffic control devices; sight distances for both bicyclists and motor vehicle operators; refuge island use; access control; and pavement markings ■ Adjacent Path Crossing — at an intersection where the trail crossing is placed within public intersection crosswalks In addition to standards in the WSDOT Design Manual for trail crossings, the City can consult standards and specifications developed by the National Park Service Handbook for Trail Design and Construction and Maintenance, and US Forest Service Standard Trail Plans and Specifications. Transit Stop Integration The first and last mile problem, one of the most complex challenges for public transit, refers to the beginning and end of a trip primarily made by public transit. Renton's questionnaire responses summarized in Chapter 3 and Appendix A indicate that residents use bicycles or walk - JANUARY 2019 •' - - TRAIL & BICYCLE SYSTEM PLAN AGENDA ITEM # 9. b) CITY OF RENTON • RENTON TRAILS AND BICYCLE MASTER PLAN to make short, local trips typically associated with the first and last mile to or from the destination. Improving walking and biking infrastructure to appeal to a broad and diverse range of people can help address the first and last mile problem and thereby make it easier for more people to access transit. This plan includes proposed projects that will improve access to high density residential or commercial zones, transit, or services. Likewise, there are many things that transit agencies can do to make transit use more convenient, including: ■ Allowing bikes on board ■ Providing bicycle parking at transit centers or stops ■ Providing for bike sharing ■ Wayfinding along bike routes ■ Ride sharing to transit hubs in low transit service areas ■ Avoid requiring assigned bike spaces Signage This plan promotes a connected system to take trail and bicycle facility users to everyday destinations. A wayfinding plan for signage can help them find their destination or discover a new one. The Renton Downtown Civic Core Vision and Action Plan provides a wayfinding system to link pedestrians and cyclists to parks, trails, and places in the Downtown. The wayfinding system advances the design and character of Downtown. The City anticipates a similar wayfinding approach citywide with variations unique to each neighborhood. Exhibit 5-17. Renton Downtown Civic Core Wayfinding System Source: City of Renton, 2018. JANUARY 2019 TRAIL & BICYCLE SYSTEM PLAN ----------------------- AGENDA ITEM # 9. b) RENTON TRAILS AND BICYCLE MASTER PLAN • CITY OF RENTON The City may develop route -specific signage and/or pavement markings to guide pedestrians and bicyclists to their destinations along preferred routes. Route designation and guide signs would be installed based on regional standards. Sign spacings may depend on the regional, neighborhood, and local destinations on the route. Bike route signs may be mounted to freestanding posts or to existing utility poles or light standards. In addition to wayfinding guidelines, this plan addresses roadway caution signage and pavement markings. Roadside caution signs and pavement markings follow the standards and guidelines of the Manual of Uniform Traffic Control Devices and the AASHTO Guidelines for the Development of Bicycle Facilities. King County promotes regional trail wayfinding elements through a general policy in its King County Open Space Plan: Parks, Trails, and Natural Areas: CIP-757 King County shouldIshall provide up-to-date mapping and consistent wayfinding throughout the regional trails network to enhance user navigation and travel. Trail wayfinding programs should be consistent with the USDOT MUTCD and regionally -accepted wayfinding programs. King County has also created a King County Regional Trails System (RTS) Arts Master Plan calling for improved signage standards consistent between the County and cities: The RTS needs an appropriate wayfinding approach to signage; this standard should be included in the RTS Design Guidelines. Consider improved signage standards consistent among King County and other jurisdictions, with an eye toward unifying alignments. For the Cedar River Tail in King County, the Art Master Plan calls for Gateway/Trailhead Wayfinding Projects, Elements, and Signage. Site Amenities Bike Parking Guidelines Bicyclists will seek to park as close as possible to their final destination. Per ASHTO guidance, bicycle racks should be located so that they: Are easily accessed from the street and protected from motor vehicles. rob _ ------------------------ - — — JANUARY 2019 �' — — TRAIL & BICYCLE SYSTEM PLAN AGENDA ITEM # 9. b) CITY OF RENTON • RENTON TRAILS AND BICYCLE MASTER PLAN ■ Are visible to passers-by to promote usage and enhance security. ■ Do not impede or interfere with pedestrian traffic or routine maintenance activities. ■ Allow reasonable clearance for opening of passenger -side doors of parked cars. ■ Are covered, if possible, where users will leave their bikes for a longer amount of time. Performance criteria for bike parking racks have been developed by the Association of Pedestrian and Bicycle Professionals, September 2015, in the Essentials of Bike Parking. Bike racks should be designed to: ■ Support bikes upright without putting stress on wheels ■ Accommodate a variety of bicycles and attachments ■ Allow locking of frame and at least one wheel with a U-lock ■ Be intuitive to use Bicycle Lean Rails The City of Renton may install bicycle lean rails at intersections allowing bicyclists to rest their arms and feet when waiting at intersections. They have been installed in Seattle along the Burke -Gilman Trail, together with a push button at the intersection to initiate a crossing phase. Exhibit 5-18. Bicycle Leaning Rail Source: City of Seattle. Trailheads and Amenities Trailheads serve as the designated entryways into trails and have clear signage. Features also include vehicle or bicycle parking, information ---------------------------- --- ion JANUARY 2019 TRAIL & BICYCLE SYSTEM PLAN - - - '. AGENDA ITEM # 9. b) RENTON TRAILS AND BICYCLE MASTER PLAN • CITY OF RENTON stations, informal recreation areas, seating and picnic areas, plazas or gathering spaces, and restrooms. For maintenance and emergency vehicle access, trailheads would be allowed occasional vehicle access. Trailheads may offer various levels of amenities depending on location, need, and expected user groups. Access should be provided and controlled so that ad hoc trails do not occur on private land or on public lands where access is not desired, e.g. environmentally sensitive areas. The following guidelines relate to the development and placement of trailheads and access points. ■ Trailhead Location: Trailheads should be placed at each terminus of a trail corridor, and any place where a large concentration of trail users is expected, such as at major parks along the trail. ■ Trailhead Features: Trailheads should at least include parking and a trail map. Trailheads may also include restrooms, drinking water, picnic facilities, benches, optional lighting, bike racks, and other recreational amenities. Site specific designs can also create or enhance neighborhood identity, incorporate public art, and/or provide cultural or environmental interpretation opportunities. ■ Trailhead Special Parking Designs: Trailheads associated with off - road biking trails or equestrians should provide parking and turn- around space for trailers. ■ Trailhead Accessibility: An accessible pathway should be developed that connects parking and other accessible elements to the trailhead. ADA access should be provided to as many site features as possible based on site conditions ■ Trail Access Points: Trail access points should be placed wherever trail access is expected, such as at schools, commercial areas, and parks. Trail access points should include signage identifying the trail and may include a map and drinking water. These access points serve to encourage neighborhood and local pedestrian and bicycle access to the trail system. They provide minimal amenities, most importantly trail system signs. They should be located at approximately one quarter - mile intervals along corridors, particularly along regional trail routes or other routes with large concentrations of uses. Entry nodes typically do not include parking facilities but could have a few standard size spaces depending on needs and circumstances. - JANUARY 2019 �' - - TRAIL & BICYCLE SYSTEM PLAN AGENDA ITEM # 9. b) CITY OF RENTON • RENTON TRAILS AND BICYCLE MASTER PLAN Landscaping: Typical landscape elements will include grass and trees or shrubs to buffer parking areas from the street. Trees may provide shade relief and accentuate amenities within the trailhead location, and alert trail users to the presence of a trailhead. Informal landscaped areas may offer recreation potential. Signs: Signs should include general and interpretive signs, location map, and rules/notices. Additional Design Guidance Resources AASHTO Guide for the Development of Bicycle Facilities This manual of design standards is recognized nationally as the "industry standard for development of bicycle facilities." All of the design guidelines included in the recommendations section of this plan will meet the minimum standards articulated in the AASHTO document. WSDOT Local Agency Guidelines This manual identifies specific design standards related to bicycle and pedestrian facility installations. These standards are referenced in the design guidelines. King County Regional Trails Guidelines King County Regional trail guidelines are closely aligned with the AASHTO guidelines but are intended to create and unify the regional network by standardizing regional trail design elements, based on the concerns of safety, convenience, aesthetic experience, and economical maintenance. Some King County regional trails see as many as 2,000 users a day. As such, the regional trail standards are designed to accommodating a large number and variety of users in a safe, efficient, and enjoyable manner. Other The City may also consult standards and specifications developed by the National Park Service Handbook for Trail Design and Construction and Maintenance, US Forest Service Standard Trail Plans and Specifications, or the United States Access Board, A Summary of Accessibility Standards for Federal Outdoor Developed Areas. JANUARY 2019 TRAIL & BICYCLE SYSTEM PLAN AGENDA ITEM # 9. b) RENTON TRAILS AND BICYCLE MASTER PLAN • CITY OF RENTON PROJECTS & PRIORITIES Projects Responding to gaps and needs and community input, and Guiding Principles, this plan promotes trail and bicycle facilities of all types across all Community Planning Areas. Eighty projects have been identified. Shared Use Path Pedestrian Trail Striped Bike Lane Protected Bike Lane JANUARY 2019 TRAIL & BICYCLE SYSTEM PLAN AGENDA ITEMil 6w BOA v o zt o a� r 1 1 , al Lake Washington r "o''e Le Lakeridge Park m y r N N ova a ' « 9000Skyway u r a Park S 1 24thS m s • S �2gthst S 133rd St S 132nd St t or • N , > \ , c \ M, W Cedar River Trail Park N° am 1~ 1� 1 IZ 1 1 aVIP_r___7.' Way fy Cr reenway Newcas�leC/ub f Cougar rm 11 N 30th St Future � SW Athletic r♦ ® Complex • _ f ♦ � � ♦ a e d May ' 1 I 1 r 1 eek NS 24�h,St_ � • 1 1 � McA 'll-i ♦ 1 y.VL2.3;d PI 1 0_ W �•• 1 1 ; 1 Honey Creek m Z 1 1 ,� Greenway 1 a >u's /.L7 ♦ 1 I ♦� 1 �. UEJ 9th: at ID - a a 1 Gene Coulon >1 Memorial Beach 21 1 r ; , ��, �� �t 6 May Park 1 1 1 1-ri'H� 1 IValleyCounty 900 rr� `rf •a•(�• _i_ r__i�_ fJzr�St' 1 Park a ♦ I♦ 1♦ 1 ' I v ' I IT Moy v � 1� {,�♦ ��� � I � �4C{�193h�1i_�__L�EL4th�StJ plleyRd ♦ Cll Z ■ tea+ I c 1 Z Ia v� !�1 ZF ;IT, , N Sr ;Q cy 1 r 1 E 1� L >♦�3.wC �Ia ��fElUl�i. 1 1 o v 01 ' -fir I al = a' Ia> NE���t .. I Coaltfigld "'I r1:_.E, r� l0 1$t Sa•, �•►,ti'stjl., ■SF� .. NE I� I 1 St4' f y1 1IZ ;'.r SE 128th St IN,I Cedar Riverlo tN ® 1 > LakeSallfrAGThishl o�AveS�. r_a > At Cedar 1 h 1 �P CL' •-____�l v ��•, *River Ir ON • * 3 'a LT.1 900 +' ,•. Park l Maplewood 1 QI Foster rr O e \ GL7. 1 ) 1 Community Park I «I r Golf Course N Black River ,♦ 1 /fi{ ��LvO Propert I 10: Riparian • ��' j , 1 ^I ,'a, j Forest •��' rrrre• ■ 4T3 Riverview Park s Maplewood -- ��---•� �J-----_-_+_ HeightsPark •o w f S nth �t ♦ S 7th St I Cedar River Natural Area V r I �� t-_--�--_f___..__�C51 ate.... ® Maplewood s• mMetr I ♦ S 7th Sty Golf Course � ; 1 ., 1 Wat work ♦ ©-• / o Par Spri brook 14e1 1 ♦S r �-7 Fort Dent Trail d V.IaY S GTCI CH 1 BP • I� � 5 Gra Y � IN oo♦ ♦'>i m Imo 4, Ron Regis / O Park ; ♦� ♦ Iyk. ♦ GV r �y� SouthQenter Bl�a 1 I 1 m ♦N I e,Oa I ,�, ,���♦ Soosl4OtIl 1 3 •♦ I 1 p ; Creek and �ay Tukwila Pkwy N > '+' It Trail , -.,--�. Trail a ♦ 3 Panilher Creek I ; a♦ ' �.I �.rJ �,, 1�,, I a � w Wetlands T! __•�.� ♦ ♦___+�E,��Qi11+5 i-_-___ ' 1 w ¢ ; 'r ♦ ♦ r ; *1 Cascade ;ark ♦ 1 a 241 1 SW 271h St-• 1° ♦ 1 II - 1 Im 10 ♦ �O I I1 j 1 1 00 Gre 1 12 as ♦ Renton---------F--- R' er 1 ;> ♦ ♦ SE 168th St ail Wetlands 1 , 1a r� ♦ ,y N; r Re�tt4n Park SW thSt f1. (A�,7 A Iw AA ON QI j 1 1 � SW 41st St . j Edlund r•-LE PAtLPYltky."I_------•rr Y'Yr , Property 'oaC\ 1 I ♦, S 18 h.5t A r_-_ _ ,r� S 0 ; I 1 � V. ' 1 w 3A 1 j I w i-. SF.1 H4tIL§L r a o0e 1¢ ' I 1 1 I 1 1 I 1 1 41 / 1 SE 192nd St Cleveland / Richardson j Property __F Springbrook Watershed N r I N 0 0.5 1 Miles 167 a « N SE 183rd St N a Q SE 3ones Rd Cavanaugh Pond T Existing Trails Shared Use Path Striped Bike Lane Signed Shared Roadway Pedestrian Trail Proposed Trails •--- Shared Use Path •---• Protected Bike Lane Striped Bike Lane ---- Neighborhood Greenway Signed Shared Roadway Pedestrian Trail Parks & Open Space OCommunity Center Library O Potential Transit Hub r School Proposed Project Number, Name 17, Harrington Ave NE Neighborhood Greenway = 51, Pacific Railroad Trailhead & Trail 68, South Highlands Neighborhood Greenway 1, 1 16th Avenue SE Bike Lanes 18, Highlands Hillclimb 35, May Valley Trail 52, Panther Creek Trail 69, Springbrook Trail 2, 1 28th Avenue SE Bike Lanes 19, Hillcrest Neighborhood Greenway 36, Mill Avenue S Signed Shared Roadway 53, Powerline Trail 70, Springbrook Trail Extension 3, 156th Avenue SE Bike Lanes 20Honey Creek Trail Extensions 37, Monroe Avenue NE Bike Lanes 54, Puget Drive Bike Lanes & Signed Shared Roadway 71, Sunset Boulevard Hillclimb 4, Benson Drive S/108th Avenue SE Shared Use Pathji: Houser Way and Factory Avenue , N 4th Street Connector 4�lt` 55, Renton Connector 72, SW 16th Street Shared Use Path 5, Benson Neighborhood Greenway , Houser Way N Shared Use Path 39, N 6th Street Bike Lanes 56, Renton Park Neighborhood Greenway 73, SW 27th Street Connector 6, Benson Road/Main Avenue S Bike Lanes 23, Jericho Avenue NE Bike Lanes 40, N 8th Street Shared Use Path 57, S 2nd Street Protected Bike Lan 74, Talbot Road S Bike Lanes Wascade Waterline Spur Trail ' 24, Kennydale Neighborhood Greenway 41, Naches Avenue Shared U�lllll 58, S 3rd Street Signed Shared Roadway 75, Thunder Creek Trail 8, Cedar to Sammamish Trail 25, Kennydale Signed Shared Roadway 42, NE 3rd Street 59, S/SW 7th Street Transit Connector 76, Tiffany -Cascade Connector Trail 9, Duvall Avenue NE Bike Lan 26, Kenyon -Dobson Trail and Trailhead 43, NE 4th Street Bike Lanes 60, Sam Chastain Waterfront Trail 77, Tiffany Park Neighborhood Greenway 10, East Valley Road Shared Use Path , Lake to Sound Trail: East Segment 44, NE 1 2th Street Bike Lanes 61, SE 168Th Street Protected Bike Lanes 78, Tukwila Station Trail 11, Eastside Rail Corridor 28, Lake to Sound Trail: West Segment 45, NE 16th Street Signed Shared Roadway 62, SE 182nd & 184th Streets Neighborhood Greenway 79, Union Avenue NE Bike Lanes 12, Edmonds Avenue Connector 29, Lake Washington Loop Trail 46, NE Sunset Blvd Shared Use Path 63, SE Petrovitsky Road Shared Use Path 80, Wells Avenue S Signed Shared Roadway 13, Garden Avenue N Shared Use Path _ 30, Langston Road/SW 134th Street Hillclimb 47, Nile Avenue NE Bike Lanes 64, Seattle Waterline Spur Trail 14, Glencoe Neighborhood Greenway 31, Logan Avenue N Shared Use Path 48, North Highlands Neighborhood Greenway 65, Seattle Waterline Trail Highest Priorty Project 15, Grant Avenue Neighborhood Greenway 32, Maplewood Heights Neighborhood Greenway 49, North Southport Drive Shared Use Path 66, Shattuck to Airport Connector 16, Hardie Avenue Bike Lane & Shared Use Path 33, May Creek Hillclimb 50, Oakesdale Avenue Bike Lanes Soos Creek Trail AGENDA ITEM # 9. b) AGENDA ITEM # 9. b) CITY OF RENTON • RENTON TRAILS AND BICYCLE MASTER PLAN Project Prioritization Methodology Eighty projects were scored with prioritization criteria addressing five categories: Connectivity and Accessibility, Safety and Trail Experience, Equity, Economy and Community, and Construction and Implementation. Each category was weighted with Connectivity and Accessibility and Safety and Trail Experience weighted more highly, Equity weighted moderately, and Economy and Community and Construction and Implementation weighted lower. For each category, indicators or variables were developed. For each indicator, project evaluation criteria were developed, and each rated on either a 3-part high, medium, or low range or a 5-part high, medium -high, medium, medium -low, and low range. See Exhibit 5-20 and Appendix D for detailed information. Exhibit 5-20. Prioritization Criteria and Indicators Connectivity and Does the project: Accessibility ■ Fill a gap between existing facilities, or Weight: 30% ■ Fill gap in area with no/few facilities, or ■ Remove pedestrian and/or bicycle barriers? Safety and Trail Experience Weight: 30% Equity Weight: 20% To what extent does this project improve pedestrian/bike access to schools? Does this project offer connections to parks, recreation, or natural areas? Does the project increase the extent of the low stress (LTS 1 or 2) network? Does the project enhance the natural environment experience? Does the project address a known issue regarding user experience (intersections, slope/terrain, lighting, wayfinding, formalize informal trail, etc.)? Does the project reach a large number of people and jobs? Does the project improve bicycle or pedestrian access for users older than Age 64 and/or users younger than Age 1 8? Does the project improve bicycle or pedestrian access for the city's Households in Poverty? JANUARY 2019 TRAIL & BICYCLE SYSTEM PLAN - - - - ' . AGENDA ITEM # 9. b) RENTON TRAILS AND BICYCLE MASTER PLAN • CITY OF RENTON Economy and Community Weight: 10% Construction and Implementation Weight: 10% Does the project leverage plans or priorities? Does the project improve access to high density residential or commercial zones, transit, or services? Does the project reflect public feedback? Is the project a strong candidate for possible grants? To what extent can the project be implemented with future construction? Is the project reasonably attainable? Is the cost reasonably balanced with potential benefits? Source: City of Renton, 201 8; BERK, 2018. Tiers & Results Once scored, three tiers of projects were developed: Highest Priority, High Priority, and Medium Priority. The City used two qualitative criteria in addition to prioritization scores to develop the Highest Priority projects list (Tier 1 ): partnership commitments and geographic equity. Thus, the top scoring projects include the highest scoring projects, plus projects with known commitments, and projects that are opportunistic, feasible in the near term, enhance connectivity across planning areas, or assist with geographic equity. Since some projects had identical scores, there were 27 projects in Tier 1, 26 projects in Tier 2, and 27 projects in Tier 3. The process is illustrated in Exhibit 5-21. Exhibit 5-21. Prioritization Process Source: BERK, 2018. Ira ___ ------------------------ — JANUARY 2019 •' — — TRAIL & BICYCLE SYSTEM PLAN AGENDA ITEM # 9. b) CITY OF RENTON • RENTON TRAILS AND BICYCLE MASTER PLAN Project tiers are nearly equal in length, but Tier 1 projects emphasize Shared Use Paths, and complete all Protected Bike Lanes. Striped Bike Lanes are also increased. Implementation of Neighborhood Greenways is initiated but is a smaller share than in later phases. Tier 2 continues to advance Shared Use Paths, adds Striped Bike Lanes, and adds Neighborhood Greenways, plus implements most Pedestrian Trails. Tier 3 completes the network with the emphasis on Neighborhood Greenways, as well as Striped Bike Lanes, and Shared Use Paths. See Exhibit 5-22. Exhibit 5-22. Facility Types by Project Tiers (Miles) Shared Use Path 16.5 6.4 Protected Bike Lane 3.0 - Protected Bike Lane 0.4 - Two -Way Protected Bike Lane 2.7 - Striped Bike Lane 7.0 8.2 Striped Bike Lane 7.0 7.5 Buffered Bike Lane - 0.8 Neighborhood Greenway 1.4 14.4 Signed Shared Roadway 1.6 5.2 Pedestrian Trail 3.0 0.5 Boa rdwa I k 0.2 - Hard Surface Trail - - Soft Su rfa ce Tra i 1 2.9 0.5 Total Miles 32.5 34.7 Note: Numbers are in miles and are rounded. Source: City of Renton, 201 8; BERK, 2018. The project list is provided in Exhibit 5-23. Project cut sheets are included in Appendix C. Details of the ranking process are provided in Appendix D. JANUARY 2019 TRAIL & BICYCLE SYSTEM PLAN AGENDA ITEM # 9. b) RENTON TRAILS AND BICYCLE MASTER PLAN • CITY OF RENTON Exhibit 5-23. Project Ranking 1 55 Renton Connector 0 0 0 0 4 1 28 Lake to Sound Trail: West Segment 0 0 0 0 4 3 57 S 2nd St Protected Bike Lanes 0 4 4 69 Springbrook Trail 0 0 4 5 11 Eastside Rail Corridor Q1 5 7 Cascade Waterline Spur Trail 0 0 4 4 7 29 Lake Washington Loop Trail 7 73 SW 27th St Connector 7 27 Lake to Sound Trail: East Segment 0 4 4 0 4 10 60 Sam Chastain Water Trail 10 46 NE Sunset Blvd Shared Use Path 10 12 Edmonds Ave Connector 0 4 4 10 67 Soos Creek Trail 14 20 Honey Creek Trail Extension 14 34 May Creek Trail 14 9 Duvall Ave NE Bike Lanes 14 80 Wells Ave S Signed Shared Roadway (I 0 14 43 NE 4th St Bike Lanes 19 21 Houser Way & Factory Avenue 0 4 0 4 19 22 Houser Way N Shared Use Path 4 0 0 4 19 13 Garden Ave N Shared Use Path 0 4 4 0 4 22 17 Harrington Ave NE Neighborhood Greenway 0 (10 4 0 4 22 61 SE 168th St Protected Bike Lanes 24 1 1 16th Ave SE Bike Lanes C) 4 0 0 4 24 59 S/SW 7th St Transit Corridor 24 38 N 4th St Connector 24 41 Naches Ave Shared Use Path - - - JANUARY 2019 •'9 - - TRAIL & BICYCLE SYSTEM PLAN �`--------------------- ----- AGENDA ITEM # 9. b) CITY OF RENTON • RENTON TRAILS AND BICYCLE MASTER PLAN 28 63 SE Petrovitsky Rd Shared Use Path a 28 64 Seattle Waterline Spur Trail 28 65 Seattle Waterline Trail 28 70 Springbrook Trail Extension 32 49 N Southport Dr Shared Use Path 32 53 Powerline Trail 32 76 Tiffany -Cascade Connector Trail 35 31 Logan Ave N Shared Use Path 35 6 Benson Rd/Main Ave S Bike Lanes 37 79 Union Ave NE Bike Lanes 37 78 Tukwila Station Trail 37 39 N 6th St Bike Lanes 0 O 37 8 Cedar to Sammamish Trail 41 26 Kenyon -Dobson Trail & Trailhead 41 51 Pacific Railroad Trailhead & Trail 41 74 Talbot Rd S Bike Lanes 0 4 C� 4 44 50 Oakesdale Ave Bike Lanes 4 0 4 44 66 Shattuck to Airport Connector 4 4 0 4 44 5 Benson Neighborhood Greenway 0 C) (10 C 47 48 North Highlands Neighborhood Greenway 4 47 19 Hillcrest Neighborhood Greenway 4 C 4 47 36 Mill Ave S Signed Shared Roadway 4 50 75 Thunder Creek Trail 4 4 50 37 Monroe Ave NE Bike Lanes 50 72 SW 16th St Shared Use Path 50 52 Panther Creek Trail JANUARY 2019 TRAIL & BICYCLE SYSTEM PLAN - '. AGENDA ITEM # 9. b) RENTON TRAILS AND BICYCLE MASTER PLAN • CITY OF RENTON 54 40 N 8th St Shared Use Path 4 (:j 4 4 55 16 Hardie Ave Bike Lane & Shared Use Path 0 4 4 55 30 Langston Rd/SW 134th St Hillclimb Co C 57 4 Benson Drive S/108th Ave SE Shared Use Path 0 4 4 (11 57 42 NE 3rd St 59 56 Renton Park Neighborhood Greenway 4 O 59 18 Highlands Hillclimb (10 59 58 S 3rd St Signed Shared Roadway (1 0 4 62 10 East Valley Rd Shared Use Path O 62 2 128th Ave SE Bike Lanes 0 4 62 68 South Highlands Neighborhood Greenway O 62 77 Tiffany Park Neighborhood Greenway 0 66 44 NE 12th St Bike Lanes O Q 66 45 NE 16th St Signed Shared Roadway 0 66 35 May Valley Trail 4 O 0 4 69 71 Sunset Blvd Hillclimb O 4 70 33 May Creek Hillclimb 0 0 70 23 Jericho Ave NE Bike Lanes 4 C) 0 0 O 72 62 SE 182nd & 184th Streets Neighborhood Greenway 0 0 73 15 Grant Ave Neighborhood Greenway O 0 74 32 Maplewood Heights Neighborhood Greenway 0 (1 0 0 75 54 Puget Dr Bike Lanes & Signed Shared Roadway 0 75 24 Kennydale Neighborhood Greenway 0 0 O 77 14 Glencoe Neighborhood Greenway O O 0 0 77 25 Kennydale Signed Shared Roadway O 0 0 79 47 Nile Ave NE Bike Lanes 0 O O 0 0 80 3 156th Ave SE Bike Lanes 0 0 0 O O - - - JANUARY 2019 •'9 - - TRAIL & BICYCLE SYSTEM PLAN --------------------- ----- AGENDA ITEM # 9. b) CITY OF RENTON • RENTON TRAILS AND BICYCLE MASTER PLAN JANUARY 2019 AGENDA ITEM # 9. b) RENTON TRAILS AND BICYCLE MASTER PLAN • CITY OF RENTON THIS PAGE IS INTENTIONALLY BLANK AGENDA ITEM # 9. b) CITY OF RENTON • RENTON TRAILS AND BICYCLE MASTER PLAN 6 IMPLEMENTATION STRATEGIES This chapter identifies actions the City can take to optimally implement the goals, objectives, and projects of this plan. It also identifies topics meant for further exploration. MONITORING The City intends to track its performance periodically to determine progress on implementation of this plan. Potential monitoring strategies are listed in Exhibit 6-1. Monitoring is recommended biennially in association with updates to the City budget and capital improvement program. Performance measurement is a useful strategy in requesting additional funding and resources. Exhibit 6-1. Potential Monitoring Measures and Targets Connectivity & Accessibility Percentage of bicycle facility network completed within quarter mile of schools and parks. Safety & Trail Experience Percentage increase in LTS 1 or 2 network. Equity Percentage of households within 1/4 mile of network Percentage increase in network serving children, elderly, households in poverty. Economy & Community Percentage increase in access to high density residential or commercial zones, transit, or services. Percentage progress on Tier 1 Projects. Construction & Implementation Projects programed and completed in six -year CIP. Source: City of Renton, 2018. PHASING Given local conditions on each route and available funding, Renton may phase improvements and consider alternative trail and bicycle facility types and cross sections. At the project design level, each project will be reassessed to determine the appropriateness of the suggested JANUARY 2019 IMPLEMENTATION STRATEGIES AGENDA ITEM # 9. b) RENTON TRAILS AND BICYCLE MASTER PLAN • CITY OF RENTON improvements, and to determine the available right-of-way, etc. When a project is in the development phase, a topographic and right-of-way survey will provide the first clear picture of the actual conditions of the route, and it may be necessary to implement a different design solution or combination of design solutions than are shown in this plan. In addition, there may be development of other capital projects or changes in funding strategies that dictate a different cross section or facility classification than the one currently identified. PARTNERSHIP & FUNDING OPPORTUNITIES Partnerships The City's trail and bicycle system is an integral part of the county and state transportation and park system. Key regional and state partners include: ■ Cities of Newcastle, Issaquah, Kent, Tukwila, and others ■ King County Parks ■ King County Metro ■ Renton, Issaquah, and Kent School Districts ■ Sound Transit ■ Washington State Department of Transportation The City has planned in partnership with these agencies to develop this plan, and these partners can advance implementation of this system through joint design, funding, and coordination. The City seeks to work with additional partners, such as Seattle -King County Public Health which is advancing a healthy communities program, and the Puget Sound Regional Council with a Regional Open Space Strategy. Funding The City of Renton includes non -motorized capital investments in the annual Six -Year Transportation Improvement Program (TIP). The TIP is adopted annually by the City Council. The 2019-2024 TIP has programmed funding - JANUARY 2019 •' -- IMPLEMENTATION STRATEGIES AGENDA ITEM # 9. b) CITY OF RENTON • RENTON TRAILS AND BICYCLE MASTER PLAN to implement some of the projects identified in the Trail and Bicycle Master Plan: ■ $1,450,000 Walkway program. ■ $1,850,000 Intersection Safety & Mobility Program. ■ Project level implementation of pedestrian and bicycle routes per this plan (e.g. Lake Washington Loop Trail). The funding can be used for planning, design, and construction phases of the projects as well as for local matches for state and federal grants. Although it may not be the primary purpose of a particular project or program, many TIP projects have the potential to assist in implementing projects within the Trails and Bicycle Master Plan. The Washington State Recreation and Conservation Office (RCO) provides matching grants for trail acquisition and development and is open to local and state agencies. Grant applications are received on even calendar years. Many funds require a comprehensive plan, such as this master plan. Funds that are open to local agencies include: ■ Aquatic Lands Enhancement Account (ALEA) - Provides funding to buy, protect, and restore aquatic lands habitat and to provide public access to the waterfront. Projects must be associated with navigable waters of the state. ■ Land and Water Conservation Fund (LWCF) - State Program. Provides funding to buy or develop public outdoor recreation areas and facilities. Grants support both acquisition and development of active and passive recreation areas and conservation lands. Public use is required. ■ Land and Water Conservation Fund (LWCF) - Outdoor Recreation Legacy Partnership Program. Provides funding to buy or develop public outdoor recreation areas and facilities in, or serving, urban areas with 50,000 or more people. Grants support both acquisition and development of active and passive recreation areas and conservation lands. Public use is required. ■ Washington Wildlife and Recreation Program, Trails Category (WWRP) - Provides funding to acquire, develop, or renovate pedestrian, equestrian, bicycle, or cross-country ski trails. Program is for non -motorized trails that provide connections to neighborhoods, communities, or regional trails. JANUARY 2019 IMPLEMENTATION STRATEGIES AGENDA ITEM # 9. b) RENTON TRAILS AND BICYCLE MASTER PLAN • CITY OF RENTON In 2007, King County voters approved Proposition 2, which included expanding the regional trail system over a six -year period, with the last distribution to cities ending in 2013. In 2013, King County voters approved a second, six -year levy (Proposition 1 ) which provides for trail acquisition and development; the last distribution will be in 2019. King County is considering placing a third levy on the ballot for voters to approve in 2019 which could also be used for trail acquisition and development. REQUIREMENTS & INCENTIVES Implementing Standards at Time of Development The City has enacted ordinances that give it authority to require developers to implement the trail and bicycle cross sections and projects in this plan. ■ Street Frontage and Off -site Street Improvements (RMC 4-6-060): To implement trail and bicycle standards, the City can require that facilities that are within the right of way are implemented with street frontage improvements consistent with the standards in this plan and the City's development regulations pertaining to streets. When offsite improvements are required to support new development, the City can require implementation of pedestrian and bicycle improvements as part of its street standards. ■ Shoreline Public Access Requirements (RMC 4-3-090): The Shoreline Master Program also requires shoreline public access when demand is created and is another regulatory program that can advance trails in shoreline jurisdiction. In the near -term, the City can amend its environmental review procedures (RMC 4-9-070) to include this plan in its SEPA Substantive Authority, and development that would impact the trail and bicycle system could be conditioned to mitigate impacts, such as implementing improvements that serve as mitigation. The City already adopts its Comprehensive Plan, Transportation Improvement Program, and Parks, Recreational, Natural Areas (PRNA) Plan, and this Trails and Bicycle Master Plan can be similarly included. The City can also adopt regulations that require trail easements when a development is located within an area identified for a local or regional trail system in this plan. rya ------------------------ — JANUARY 2019 �' -- IMPLEMENTATION STRATEGIES AGENDA ITEM # 9. b) CITY OF RENTON • RENTON TRAILS AND BICYCLE MASTER PLAN Incentives There are two types of incentives relevant to this plan: ■ Incentives for Individuals: The City can continue to require commute trip reduction programs by large employers, who can incentivize their employees to use non -motorized forms of commuting or transit. The City can also support and encourage federal and state tax incentives or subsidies to encourage bike and transit commuting. ■ The City can provide development incentives when amenities for transit users, bicyclists, and pedestrians are included and being implemented. Where improvements are not required for new development, but extension of trail or bike facilities is planned, the City could incentivize voluntary trail and bicycle project implementation such as through density or height bonuses for new development or allowing onsite density transfer from trail corridors to other developable parts of the site. Fee in Lieu The City could allow or require development to provide trail or bicycle facility improvements or pay a fee in lieu when it is not in the City's interest to have the improvement installed at the time of permit. This may occur when the expected improvement is a short segment of a longer trail improvement and the work should be done all at once. The City allows a fee in lieu of required street improvements in RMC 4-9-060. E-bike & Motorized Foot Scooters Electric bikes and motorized foot scooters are finding popularity in major cities across the country. These types of vehicles increase more use of trails and bicycle facilities because they assist with speed and sloped terrain. The State regulates motorized foot scooters and local communities may pass their own regulations. A motorized foot scooter is a device with no more than two 7 fl- inch or smaller diameter wheels that has handlebars, is designed to be stood or sat upon by the operator, and is powered by an internal combustion engine or electric motor that is capable of propelling the device with or without human propulsion. JANUARY 2019 IMPLEMENTATION STRATEGIES AGENDA ITEM # 9. b) RENTON TRAILS AND BICYCLE MASTER PLAN • CITY OF RENTON The City restricts motorized foot scooters in any park, trail, or sidewalk, or on streets with a maximum speed limit of 25 miles per hour, or any corridor marked "No non -motorized vehicles." Recently, the State passed SB 6434 in 2018 regulating different types of electric bikes and where they may be allowed on bike lanes or trails. Similar to Motorized Foot Scooters, the City could determine how to regulate E-Bikes as allowed under State law. COMMUNITY EDUCATION & PROMOTION Events & Promotion Renton can promote awareness of the trail and bicycle system by advertising its system in its recreation program, city newsletter, online, and elsewhere. The City can also continue providing online or print maps and other materials. The City could increase recreation and community events in association with trails and bicycle facilities including fun runs, races, and other activities to promote awareness and use of the system and promote health and fitness. The City could also support guided walking and biking tours illustrating key routes and how to access key destinations. Guides could be volunteers. The City can work in partnership with King County Metro on expanding its transit to trail program that was launched in the Issaquah Alps area. Safety & Awareness Trail and bicycle safety has many facets. Potential actions to increase safety include: ■ The City can provide user safety and etiquette tips and rules on how pedestrians and bicyclists share facilities. ■ The City can advertise and support other entities who are providing safety and awareness programs such as the School District. ■ The City can implement design standards that promote crime prevention through environmental design that influence landscaping, lighting, and location of facilities. - - - JANUARY 2019 �' IMPLEMENTATION STRATEGIES AGENDA ITEM # 9. b) CITY OF RENTON • RENTON TRAILS AND BICYCLE MASTER PLAN ■ Code enforcement officers and police officers can enforce City laws and reduce civil and criminal infractions. ■ Continue to expand Renton's Trail Ranger Program. FUTURE RECOMMENDATIONS Incorporate Trails and Bicycle Master Plan in Citywide Comprehensive Plan The City references the Trails and Bicycle Master Plan in the Transportation Element. The Comprehensive Plan could be updated to reflect the 2019 plan vision, goals, and policies. Explorations in Multimodal Transportation Levels of Service The City's Comprehensive Plan Transportation Element identifies a multimodal level of service addressing person trips by motor vehicles, transit, and non -motorized (bicycle and pedestrian) modes. Person trips are the number of persons making the same trip in the same mode of travel. Using person trips provides a common metric for use in concurrency and also impact or mitigation fees. Policy T-48: A. Citywide Person Trips: Based on the City's land use and growth strategy, establish a citywide level of person trips by mode, and support each mode with capital improvements and programs. The general mode categories include: motor vehicle trips, transit trips, and non -motorized trips. The City has established a person trip bank for motor vehicle trips. The City could establish a bank of non -motorized person trips and link it to capital improvements. Utilize Prioritization Criteria for Sidewalk Plan The City completed a Comprehensive Walkway Study in 2008 that prioritized needed sidewalk projects. Feedback through the community outreach included an emphasis on sidewalks and walkways. The City could incorporate the prioritization methods used in this plan in updating the Comprehensive Walkway Study for complete network integration. JANUARY 2019 IMPLEMENTATION STRATEGIES - - - - - ' . AGENDA ITEM # 9. b) RENTON TRAILS AND BICYCLE MASTER PLAN • CITY OF RENTON Vision Zero Started in Sweden in the 1990s, Vision Zero is an approach to traffic safety for all users that sets a goal of zero traffic deaths or severe injuries through holistic, integrated action strategies. As an approach, Vision Zero includes several fundamental principles that differentiate it from traditional approaches to road safety. The City can consider whether and how to implement a Vision Zero program. Implementing Vision Zero typically involves the following practices: ■ Build and sustain leadership, collaboration, and accountability: In addition to strong and visible commitment from the Mayor and Council, large-scale, cross -sector collaboration that includes transportation, public health, law enforcement, policy makers, elected officials, and community members is key to successful implementation. ■ Collect, analyze, and use data: Data should drive all stages of Vision Zero planning, from strategy development, to ongoing management, evaluation, and predictive planning. Collecting, analyzing, and using data will need coordination across city departments. Local knowledge and community input are also important to supplement quantitative data. ■ Prioritize equity and engagement. Vision Zero planning should include effective, meaningful community dialogue to gather input from diverse voices on the issue of road safety. ■ Lead with roadway design that prioritizes safety. ■ Manage speed to safe levels. This is a central tenet of Vision Zero and includes strategies such as designing roads for lower speeds, setting and communicating safe speed limits, and enforcing these limits. ■ Maximize technology advances, but don't overlook low -tech solutions. Over the longer term, innovation in automated vehicles and other technologies offer opportunities for improvements in safety. In the shorter term, relatively inexpensive, low -tech improvements such as the addition of side guards, cameras, and mirrors on large vehicles and trucks (since large vehicles are disproportionately involved in crashes) can save lives. - - - JANUARY 2019 •' -- IMPLEMENTATION STRATEGIES AGENDA ITEM # 9. b) CITY OF RENTON • RENTON TRAILS AND BICYCLE MASTER PLAN A foundational element to implement the Vision Zero approach is the creation of a Vision Zero Action Plan that operationalizes these principles. The Action Plan includes broad community input and lays out specific measurable action steps, priorities, with clear timelines for implementation. Increase Local Funding for Non -Motorized Facilities The City could pursue other funding sources dedicated to the provision of trails and bicycle facilities. One such source is to collect mitigation fees from new development that creates a demand for service, requiring mitigation to reduce adverse impacts on the built environment. The City could condition development if it has identified impacts in environmental documents prepared under the State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA). Impacts could be determined by measuring the number of person trips that development generates on bicycle and pedestrian facilities. To implement the SEPA mitigation fee, the City could develop and publish a study of expected demand and person trip rates, and then apply it to development subject to SEPA. Fees that are collected must be expended within 5 years of receipt. JANUARY 2019 IMPLEMENTATION STRATEGIES AGENDA ITEM # 9. b) AGENDA ITEM # 9. b) CITY OF RENTON • RENTON TRAILS AND BICYCLE MASTER PLAN JANUARY 2019 AGENDA ITEM # 9. b) RENTON TRAILS AND BICYCLE MASTER PLAN • CITY OF RENTON THIS PAGE IS INTENTIONALLY BLANK AGENDA ITEM # 9. b) CITY OF RENTON • RENTON TRAILS AND BICYCLE MASTER PLAN 7 REFERENCES American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials (AASHTO). (201 2) Guide for the Development of Bicycle Facilities. See: https://www.transportation.org/- City of Renton. (2015, June 22; amended November 2017). Comprehensive Plan. Available: https://rentonwa.gov/city_hall/community_and_economic_develop ment/long_range_planning. City of Renton. (201 1). Parks, Recreation, and Natural Areas Plan. r2.1"o r P-1M https://rentonwa.gov/city—hall/community—services/parks—plannin g_and_development/parks_recreation_and_natural_areas_plan King County (2016). King County Open Space Plan: Parks, Trails, and Natural Areas 2016 Update. Available: https://www.kingcounty.gov/services/parks- recreation/parks/about/open-space-plan.aspx. King County. (2016, November 22). Technical Appendix C2: Regional Trails Needs Report. Retrieved from kingcounty.gov: https://ww.kingcounty.gov/—/media/depts/executive/performanc e-strategy-budget/regional- planning/2016CompPlanUpdate/2016Adopted-KCCP/Appendix- C2-RegTrailsNeedsReport-2016KCCP-ADO-1 12216.ashx?la=en LaCivita, Leah. (2018, April 16). New Legislation Targets E-Bikes. Retrieved from Municipal Research and Services Center: http://mrsc.org/Home/Stay-Informed/MRSC-Insight/April- 2018/New-Legislation-Targets-E-Bikes.aspx. Mineta Transportation Institute. (2012, May). Low -Stress Bicycling and Network Connectivity. Retrieved from transweb.sisu.edu: https://transweb.sisu.edu/research/low-stress-bicycling-and- network-connectivity. National Association of City Transportation Officials. (2014, March). Urban Bikeway Design Guide, Second Edition. See: https://nacto.org/publication/urban-bikeway-design-guide/. JANUARY 2019 REFERENCES ' ' ' - - _ Q_' AGENDA ITEM # 9. b) RENTON TRAILS AND BICYCLE MASTER PLAN • CITY OF RENTON National Park Service (NPS) Requirements. Civil (Site) & Environmental Engineering Standards: NPS Management Policies 2006 - The Guide to Managing the National Park System. Available: https://www.nps.gov/dscw/ds-civil-environmental.htm. United States Access Board (2014, May). Outdoor Developed Areas: A Summary of Accessibility Standards for Federal Outdoor Developed Areas. Available: https://www.access- board.gov/guidelines-and-standards/recreation-facilities/outdoor- developed-areas/a-summary-of-accessibility-standards-for- federa l-outdoor-developed -areas. US Forest Service. (2014, November). Standard Trail Plans and Specifications. Retrieved from www.fs.fed.us: https://www.fs.fed.us/managing-land/trails/trail-management- tools/trailplans. Vision Zero Network, February 2017. Moving from Vision to Action. Available: https://visionzeronetwork.org/wp- content/uploads/2017/1 1 /VZN-Moving -from-Vision-to-Action.pdf. Vision Zero Network, December 2017. Vision, Strategies, Action: Guidelines for an Effective Vision Zero Action Plan. Available: https://visionzeronetwork.org/wp- content/uploads/2017/12/VZN_ActionPlan_FINAL.pdf. Washington State Department of Transportation (WSDOT). (2018, July) Design Manual. Available: http://www.wsdot.wa.gov/Publications/Manuals/M22- O l .htm#lndividualchapters. - - - JANUARY 2019 � ' REFERENCES 0 A D AGENDA ITEM # 9. b) AGENDA ITEM # 9. b) A. COMMUNITY ENGAGEMENT SUMMARY AGENDA ITEM # 9. b) AGENDA ITEM # 9. b) Public Outreach Results & Themes Renton Trails and Bicycle Master Plan I January 2019 Introduction........................................................................................................................................... 2 TopOutreach Takeaways..................................................................................................................... 2 PotentialThemes...................................................................................................................................2 OutreachResults................................................................................................................................... 4 1. Questionnaire......................................................................................................................................................4 2. Mapping Results...............................................................................................................................................10 3. Community Open Houses................................................................................................................................15 4. King County Meetings.....................................................................................................................................15 5. Technical Advisory Committee Meetings.....................................................................................................16 CommunityWalking and Biking Potential........................................................................................... 17 AGENDA ITEM # 9. b) Introduction Plan development included an extensive outreach process, with an online survey, an interactive mapping activity, and three in -person community open houses. Additional meetings were organized with a technical advisory committee, and with regional stakeholders. A broad range of input was gathered from these engagement activities. Comments from citizens and stakeholders are organized below. Clear themes relevant to the vision emerged from this feedback and are synthesized below as well. Top Outreach Takeaways 1. Recreation -based walking and biking is still a primary purpose. Commuting by bike and on foot is also occurring and could be encouraged more. 2. Respondents preferred to walk shorter distances, around their neighborhoods, mainly for recreation. Walking was not seen as a primary mode of transportation. 3. Respondents reported longer and more frequent bicycle trips. Bicyclists bike within and beyond their neighborhood to trails, work places or school, or civic or recreation facilities. 4. Respondents preferred to walk and bike on formal facilities such as sidewalks, streets, or paved trails. 5. The Cedar River Trail is the most heavily used trail. Not surprisingly, given its central location within the city and its length, respondents cited the Cedar River Trail as the most used non -motorized trail. Trails along other riparian corridors, such as the Springbrook Creek, Honey Creek, and May Creek trails were less frequently used. 6. Addressing pedestrian and bicyclist comfort is necessary to encourage more travel and recreation by foot or bike Discontinuous or missing sidewalks, walking on roads with fast moving traffic, and difficulty crossing came up as top barriers to walking. Barriers to biking focused on the absence of biking facilities (e.g. paved shoulders, bike lanes, shared use paths), dangerous crossings and streets with fast moving cars. The lack of wayfinding was also cited as a potential barrier. 7. Connection to transit is an important need. Transit is often accessed by walking and biking and connections to current and future transit is a key link. 8. Mountain biking and other more unique forms of bicycling are pursued by about a quarter of survey respondents, who enjoy riding along lakes, streams, and rivers. 9. Equestrian use was not an identified need. The survey included questions on horseback riding, but no respondents offered input. Potential Themes Key themes emerged from the broad input received through outreach activities. Themes and representative quotes are shown in the following matrix: ai11January 2019 Renton I Renton Trails and Bicycle Master Plan Public Outreach Results & Themes 2 AGENDA ITEM # 9. b) Exhibit 1. Outreach Themes Table Theme Representative Quote Safety. ........................ Safety is a high priority theme that benefits users across the board and encourages less experienced riders to use the trail network. The network should be designed to minimize intermodal conflicts, street crossings, and travel along high speed, high traffic streets. In addition to design features, education and enforcement can improve safety. Connectivity Connectivity to regional and local destinations such as job centers, entertainment centers and transit, as well within neighborhoods, is an important feature of the network. Continuity Continuity in the network enables longer trips that are useful for commuting or active recreation and a fluid experience. Comfort and Inclusivity This refers to the diversity of experiences the network will enable, reaching across a broad range of activities, ages, and abilities. "I am not willing to walk or ride a bike on the shoulder of a busy or slightly busy road, regardless of whether or not the shoulder is paved, because it is extremely dangerous due to vehicle driver distractions (talking and texting on phone)." "Major intersections can be nerve-racking for bicyclists." "There is a lack of bike paths on the major roads that lead to the most popular destinations. I prefer to bike, but it takes longer than necessary because I find myself having to take roundabout ways in order to stay safe." "I would love to see our bike trails connect all around Seattle like the Sammamish Trail which connects to the Burke -Gilman, then down and around to the waterfront, to Alki, then back to Renton." "It is too difficult, and dangerous, to bicycle through Renton to connect to major trails leading north, south, and east (Lake Washington Trail, Rainer Ave, Green River Trail, Cedar River Trail." "The bike trail connection isn't the greatest when riding around Lake Washington and along 405.With the amount of hotels Ishopping 1parks in the area in North Renton it would be great to improve those connections to existing trails to the north for daily and recreational use." "I love the Cedar River Trail and ride it often from downtown Renton to Maple Valley. However wish it were paved beyond Maple Valley - a road bike doesn't navigate well on gravel." "1 commute from the Highlands to Kirkland. I'm an advanced and confident road rider. Some wonderful improvements have been made to signage and other aspects of driving, but there is no safe way to go up to the Highlands from down in the valley by bike. I tend to go all the way around to Kennydale and climb that big hill to come back to the Highlands rather than risk Sunset." "1 think that all trails, walkways, paths, etc. should be accessible to ALL." "1 walk for health. I sold my bicycle a few years ago, and have never felt a need to get another one. I am retired, so do not need daily transportation." "I want to bike and walk ... my car trips kill me literally and keep me isolated. I want an outdoor vibrant community." :III January 2019 Renton I Renton Trails and Bicycle Master Plan Public Outreach Results & Themes AGENDA ITEM # 9. b) Theme Well -Maintained Trails wear out with time and need sufficient resources to conduct regular maintenance to offer a predictable, consistent experience for all users. Wayfinding and Awareness A comprehensive network of wayfinding signage elements tailored for walking and bicycling allows residents to easily navigate the network and make non -motorized and multi -modal trips. Innovative and Flexible Trail design optimizes for successful sharing of the network. Soft surface trails are a desired alternative to paved trails. Outreach Results 1. QUESTIONNAIRE Participants: 340 (131 full, 209 partial) Questionnaire High Points Demographics Representative Quote "Surface maintenance is a MUST! Most importantly, keeping the shoulders Itrails clear of debris." "Safe, shared use is possible if ALL users are aware of and follow trail rules." "There needs to be better signage at all entrance points to the park and along walkways." "Make 2-person soft surface on both sides of national standard width trails so folks can run together." Date: Advertisements: June 10 to August 31, 2017 Fliers, open house, emails, website Respondents are more able-bodied than Census reports for the city. The share of Questionnaire respondents with children is similar to Census reports for Renton. ■ Questionnaire respondents' percentage with limited mobility 4%, less than Census reports for city residents identifying an ambulatory disability at 6% (ACS 1 -Year 2016). ■ Households with children under 18 years that walk: 55 of 181 respondents or about 30%. Most respondents' children walk around the neighborhood (87.9%), to or along a trail (60.3%), to a park/library/public place (48.3%), and to school (24.5%), or other destinations (12.1 %). ■ The share of respondents with children that walk is similar to the share of City households with one or more persons under 18 at 29.6% (ACS 1-Year 2016) though the Census does not track how many children walk. Purpose and Frequency Walking, running, and biking activities tend to be more for recreation purposes rather than for transportation. Most respondents walk at least 2 times per week or more, and bike 1 day per week or less. :III January 2019 Renton I Renton Trails and Bicycle Master Plan Public Outreach Results & Themes 4 AGENDA ITEM # 9. b) Exhibit 2. Recreation Frequency: Walking and Biking Mode Respondents 2-7 days per week 1 day per Never week or less Walking 269 ........................................................ 65.6% 28.9% 5.60% Biking 269 38.7% 60.4% 0.9% Running 57 44% 56% -- Questionnaire respondents are more likely to commute by walking or bicycling than the city as a whole. ■ Questionnaire commuters that walk daily 1 1.1 %, greater than Census reports for city residents at 2.4%. ■ Questionnaire commuters that bike daily 9%, greater than Census reports for city residents at 0.1 %. WherelDestinations Most respondents walk or bike around their neighborhood or to a public facility. In the case of bicyclists, they also frequently use trails. Exhibit 3. Where do you walk or bike? Location Walk Bike Around the neighborhood 88.50% 80.20% Along a trail 67.80% 81.10% To a park, library or other public facility 50.30% 43.40% To transit 21.90% 20.80% To work (or school) 20.20% 40.60% Other destinations) 14.20% 22.60% Total respondents not known. Greatest number responding to a single option: 162 Walk, 86 Bike. As shown above in Exhibit 3, 88.5% of the Renton Questionnaire respondents walk around the neighborhood. This is consistent with findings in the 2017 State Comprehensive Outdoor Recreation Planning (SCORP) document. The SCORP considers participation in recreation activities across the state and in different regions. The report found the participation rates for walking was 94% statewide. Across different ages, races, or incomes, the top recreation activity was consistently walking in a park or trail setting. About 89% of participants in the Seattle -King region participated in walking in a park or trail setting. Most participation locations occurred in a person's yard or neighborhood. Renton's Questionnaire respondents have a higher rate of biking with up to 81.1 % biking on a trail and 80.2% biking around the neighborhood. In the SCORP, rates were 28% for biking mostly on streets and roads. The first and last mile problem, one of the most complex challenges for public transit, refers to the beginning and end of a trip primarily made by public transit. Questionnaire responses indicate that :III January 2019 Renton I Renton Trails and Bicycle Master Plan Public Outreach Results & Themes 5 AGENDA ITEM # 9. b) residents use bicycles or walk to make short, local trips typically associated with the first and last mile to or from the destination. Improving walking and biking infrastructure to appeal to a broad and diverse range of people can help address the first and last mile problem and thereby make it easier for more people to access transit. Areas with larger proportions of the elderly, the young, low-income individuals, and households without access to a car also benefit from improvements to non -motorized travel, since these population groups are often considered transit dependent. Facilities Used While respondents visited a wide number of Renton park, recreation, and civic facilities, the most well visited ones were along Lake Washington and the Cedar River. Exhibit 4. Which parks libraries or other public facilities cloyou walk or bike to? Gene Coulon Memorial Beach Park Cedar River Trail Park Cedar River Park Renton Public Library Walk Bike 58.90% 53.30% 55.60% 62.20% 50.00% 64.40% 46.70% 37.80% Total respondents not known. Greatest number responding to a single option: 53 Walk, 29 Bike. Most respondents use the Cedar River Trail (82.6%, 100, Walk; 97.6% of Bicyclists, 81), and to a lesser extent May Creek and Springbrook Trails. Children walk to a large list of local schools (1 2 schools), and to a lesser extent bike to them (6 schools). The School District identifies a walkshed for each school. Children also walk to a similar list of parks and facilities as for adults overall, and to shopping and other locations. The City's 2008 Sidewalk Assessment and approach to Safe Routes to Schools should be considered. Traffic Stress A May 2012 study by Mekuria and Furth, Mineta Transportation Institute', found that "[f]or a bicycling network to attract the widest possible segment of the population, its most fundamental attribute should be low -stress connectivity, that is, providing routes between people's origins and destinations that do not require cyclists to use links that exceed their tolerance for traffic stress, and that do not involve an undue level of detour." Renton Questionnaire respondents found nearly 25% were confident on any road, about 50% were comfortable with roads having some traffic but prefer those with wide shoulders or lanes or trails, and over 20% were concerned about traffic and other factors. ' See https://transweb.sisu.edu/research/low-stress-bicycling-and-network-connectivity. 11 January 2019 Renton I Renton Trails and Bicycle Master Plan Public Outreach Results & Themes 6 AGENDA ITEM # 9. b) This level of comfort or discomfort of Renton respondents based on traffic and road conditions is similar to a study of physiological reactions to different road conditions in Portland, Oregon: Results show that on the same route: (a) stress levels during peak -hour traffic are higher than during off-peak traffic; (b) signalized intersections are hotspots for cyclists' stress; and (c) average stress levels on on -street facilities are higher than on off-street facilities. Statistical tests clearly show that separated facilities are associated with lower stress levels than other types of facilities. (Caviedes, 2016) Exhibit 5. When you bicycle on the road, which of the following best describes you? Description Percentage Respondents I am very confident riding in mixed traffic on any type of road 23.1 % 24 I am comfortable riding on roads with some traffic, but prefer 50.0% 52 to ride on roads with wide shoulders or bike lanes, or on paved trails I ride occasionally or would like to ride, but am concerned 21.2% 22 about traffic, hills, distances and the weather I do not bicycle on the road and probably never will 5.8% 6 N=104 The results together with geospatial analysis will inform the Renton Trails and Bicycle Master Plan about where and how to reduce traffic stress. Barriers & Incentives Exhibit 6. Walking or Running Barriers & Incentives Top Barriers Top Improvements or Programs to Encourage (Extreme or Moderate 50%+ Respondents) Walking or Running (Essential or Very Important 50%+Respondents) ■ Crossing the street is dangerous or difficult ■ Too much car traffic ■ Sidewalks are discontinuous or missing ■ 1 have to walk or run along a road N=269 ■ More curb ramps ■ More sidewalks ■ More paved shared -use trails, such as the Cedar River Trail ■ Maintenance of sidewalks or trail surfaces, vegetation, debris ■ Better enforcement of laws related to people driving and biking :III January 2019 Renton I Renton Trails and Bicycle Master Plan Public Outreach Results & Themes 7 AGENDA ITEM # 9. b) Exhibit 7. Bicycling Barriers & Incentives Top Barriers (Extreme or Moderate 50%+ Respondents) ■ Motor vehicles travel too fast ■ No bicycle facilities (e.g. paved shoulders, bike lanes, shared use paths) ■ Too many motor vehicles ■ Parts of my route are too stressful or dangerous lam-I•J Unique Bicycle Users Top Improvements or Programs to Encourage Biking (Essential or Very Important 50%+Respondents) ■ Safer street intersections ■ Wide paved shoulders on roads ■ Off-street paved shared use paths, such as the Cedar River Trail ■ Calm residential streets that are designated and designed for biking (called "greenways" or "bicycle boulevards") ■ Safer trail crossings at streets ■ Shared roadway treatments, such as "share the road" signs and shared lane markings ■ Convenient and secure bike parking ■ Signs identifying bicycle routes and nearby amenities ■ Maintenance of sidewalks or trail surfaces, vegetation, debris ■ Bicycle route maps and information ■ Better enforcement of laws related to people driving and biking ■ Promotion of bicycling for transportation ■ Employer incentives for bicycling to work In terms of types of bicycling Questionnaire participants pursued in Renton: ■ 100% cycle on roads or paved trails ■ 23.6% pursue mountain biking ■ 16.4% cyclocross using a mix of on and off -road facilities ■ 0.9% use BMX or pump track vehicles Those who are interested in riding a mountain bike, cyclocross or BMX bike indicated they were most interested in riding on gravel, along lakes, rivers, and streams. Currently, their off-street locations include various natural areas and trails. :III January 2019 Renton I Renton Trails and Bicycle Master Plan Public Outreach Results & Themes 8 AGENDA ITEM # 9. b) Exhibit 8. At what off-street locations do you ride a mountain, cyclocross or BMX bike in Renton? ai11January 2019 Renton I Renton Trails and Bicycle Master Plan Public Outreach Results & Themes 9 AGENDA ITEM # 9. b) 2. MAPPING RESULTS An interactive online map was open to public input from June 10, 2017 to August 31, 2017. The interactive map site had 1,380-page views and 342 data points. Participants could identify areas where they walked or biked, and problem areas. Maps and summaries of comments follow. Walking Based on input walk problems included lack of sidewalks and connections as well as traffic, speeding, and other dangerous conditions. Most pedestrian problem spots were identified in the East Plateau, North Highlands, and mid-Kennydale Planning Areas. Exhibit 9. Walking Problems Word Cloud Source: Tag Word Cloud The range of comments included: ■ Nice walk, but would feel much safer with sidewalk (Kennydale area). ■ No sidewalk for most of this very busy road (Sunset area). ■ Need signage and wayfinding to connect to Cedar River trail. ■ Missing ADA ramp. ■ There is no way to get up and down the hill safely between Carr Rd. and SE 200th St.... That's a 1.25-mile sidewalk desert. �i11 January 2019 Renton I Renton Trails and Bicycle Master Plan Public Outreach Results & Themes 10 AGENDA ITEM # 9. b) Destinations included the Cedar River Trail and May Creek Trail. Many respondents reported walking in neighborhoods on the Renton plateau (East Plateau Community Planning Area), as well as in the valley near Springbrook Trail and Black River Trail (Valley Community Planning Area). Exhibit 10. Community Input Walking Newcastle Wny c„ Newcus ut SE - tle colt qob Ry h-,ye o-ea -,er cc Oy DO O O 900 Z Z m m NE 7th St a b o a Dlo F v . z W NE 4th St J y?9th St N 4th St � 5133 rd St 5132 t N3rd St� NE3 dst 0 4 5 180th :E+ 900 SW 7th 5t ® 169 N4a'I SW 16th St � Qa \a� 3 S Puget D' 1 ° W ( m n 7" a SW 7th St SE 168th St SW 4th St j f 515 W SW 4To St R6 SfPQ �o OJ O P a e 0 0.5 1 w Miles Source: City of Renton, 2018 SE 192nd St a SE Pones Rd © Walking Destination © Walking Problem Spot a - Route that I Walk ! o� Difficult Walking Route Seti°Aa - Existing Trails 208th St �71� January 2019 Renton I Renton Trails and Bicycle Master Plan Public Outreach Results & Themes 1 1 AGENDA ITEM # 9. b) Source: City of Renton 2018 Biking Community comments on biking problem spots were similar to comments about walking. Biking problems related to concerns about travel lanes and trails, and traffic and safety conditions. Based on comments, most bike problem spots follow future alignments of the regional trail system. Exhibit 11. Biking Problem Spots e v� N mmmil Source: Tag Cloud Comments addressed different connections or safety concerns such as: ■ Add bike trail between Cedar & Green river trails. ■ Need a safe bike route connecting to Skyway and West Hill. ■ Sunset Blvd provides the best grade for connectivity with Highlands, needs bike lanes. ■ Best bike route up Benson Hill is not clear. Probably old Benson Rd, but need bike lanes to continue. Consider road diet south of Puget. ■ Very narrow shoulder, difficult connection to Jones Road from Cedar River Trail. ■ Cars using wrong lane, conflicting with NB left turning bikes and cars. (Renton/Kent border) ■ 1 ride around this area as the bridge is too narrow and unsafe, I have nearly crashed many times on this bridge. (Renton/Tukwila Border) �i11 January 2019 Renton I Renton Trails and Bicycle Master Plan Public Outreach Results & Themes 12 AGENDA ITEM # 9. b) Destinations included the Cedar River Trail, Green River Trail, Lake Washington Loop Trail, and other neighborhood locations. Exhibit 12. Community Input Biking o �Mof raj �n oy '° 9L 9 es e o"9ef v � (S �z9th S1 S 133rd St 5 132 t 909w ® I Newca:Ne 4 Way ur SE Newm:tle G.If C116 Rtl B 1.1 oro� OSO °r °too �r °r NE 4th St Otp OSp Ol0 a Ljh`enter BIvA 3 a' S Puget D,. 11F v p SW2 St oa. _ SW 4th St > _ SW41etSt s 1 HOth St m ® c = a N 0 0.5 Miles ''�6 .®. Source: City of Renton, 2018 a SE 129th St Lra `n SE loner Rd % SE 168th St u, Sf h Pe}`ohr+k o y ky SE 192 nd St An Biking Destination Biking Problem Spot a Route that I Bike Difficult Biking Route SEti°Ate Existing Trails SE 208th St :111 January 2019 Renton I Renton Trails and Bicycle Master Plan Public Outreach Results & Themes 11 13 AGENDA ITEM # 9. b) Other Ideas Other ideas addressed potential trail routes in Kennydale, the Valley, and Benson areas. Exhibit 13. Other Community Input i l9� 9P P S J` Poc o�J 9L Q PS n S /29th St S 133rd St S 132n t L6 ^ '9P — S i. IV N O S 180th a v � 0 0.5 1 m Miles 67 Source: City of Renton, 2018 Newcastle W.1, m UJ SE Newcastle Golf SE 192nd St a P N SF PeJrO�JJr�y Ry Q 0 v e a v �o SE 128th St C _h SE Jones Rd �71� January 2019 Renton I Renton Trails and Bicycle Master Plan Public Outreach Results & Themes 14 AGENDA ITEM # 9. b) These other ideas included additional connections or linkages. 3. COMMUNITY OPEN HOUSES Input at the community open houses included neighborhood specific feedback on needed improvements, as well as preferred connections and routes. No input on equestrian facilities was received. •35 persons -Preferred routes and facility types -Thoughts on potential routes *Problem spots -Wish list projects *Projects to complete *General concerns and ideas •26 persons -Regional Trail options *Preferences on network -Questions about facility designation *Plan Priorities •30 persons -Regional Trail preferences *Final Network options -Facility type discussion •Prioritization and project preferences Needed improvements included: ■ Intersection improvements along the Cedar River Trail downtown, Houser Way and Lake Washington Boulevard, and the NE bth and NE 8th at Logan Avenue N. ■ Improvements for SW 7th to make it more bike -friendly ■ Sidewalk improvements across neighborhoods Preferred Connections and Routes included: • Completion of the proposed Sam Chastain trail segment and the Soos Creek Trail north of 192nd St. (King County responsibility) • Completion of Burnett Linear Park, South and North in Civic Core ■ Houser Way was cited by many as the preferred alignment of the Eastside Rail Corridor 4. KING COUNTY MEETINGS Coordination with King County Parks and Recreation Division, Capital Projects Program, and Governmental Relations was essential to plan development with the convergence of four regional trails within Renton's Urban Growth Area: The Cedar River Trail (CR), Eastside Rail Corridor (ERC), Lake to Sound Trail (M), and the Lake Washington Loop Trail. ai11January 2019 Renton I Renton Trails and Bicycle Master Plan Public Outreach Results & Themes 15 AGENDA ITEM # 9. b) The purpose of the meetings was to collaborate with King County representatives on possible and preferred routing for the (Eastside Rail Corridor, Lake To Sound, and Cedar River) regional trails through the City of Renton, discuss alternative facility types for these corridors, update on the status of the Civic Core planning effort and review proposed cross sections for the corridors in that plan, and review the status of other regional trails/routes (Soon Creek, Lake Washington Loop). Two meetings were held to identify and agree upon the alignment and facility designations) for the regional trails. Detailed meeting summaries, route concepts, and cross -sections are included as an appendix to the Renton Trails and Bicycle Master Plan. Highlights are provided below. ■ King County representatives were supportive of strong connections among the regional trails in the downtown core. There was also support for the alternative facility standard of protected bike lanes and sidewalks. There was consensus among the City and King County representatives on the preferred alignment of the ERC, L25, and CR trails through Renton. ■ King County representatives described the example of successful partnerships with the business community (Microsoft, Google, Swedish and others) and stakeholders along the ERC. Potential partners for the Plan include both employers and community organizations: 13 Eastside Greenway Alliance 13 Boeing 13 Paccar El Hyatt El Small technology companies new to the city El Rotary Club El Chamber of Commerce ■ Ferry (foot service) across Lake Washington was discussed as a potential complement to non - motorized connections. ■ King County continues to work on the challenges along the BNSF rail corridor pertinent securing to leases from BNSF for the Lake to Sound Trail and extending the ERC adjacent to Coulon Park within BNSF right of way. ■ King County representatives emphasized the importance of identifying and enhancing the connection from regional trails to the new Transit Center on Grady Way. King County representatives encouraged connecting the Burnett Trail to the relocated Transit Center. ■ King County representatives were in general agreement with the projects identified in the preliminary list. 5. TECHNICAL ADVISORY COMMITTEE MEETINGS Community members volunteered to participate in the Technical Advisory Committee for this plan which included additional background and educational discussions to provide feedback for plan development. ■ Important considerations included: 11 The importance of connecting regional trails ai11January 2019 Renton I Renton Trails and Bicycle Master Plan Public Outreach Results & Themes 16 AGENDA ITEM # 9. b) 11 The importance of the transit center as a destination Recognition that trail users are not as aware of traffic control devices like Rectangular Rapid Flash Beacons (RRFB) or C-curbs; this lack of awareness should be addressed in design options Cost considerations, and related "low hanging fruit" or easy wins are important to elevate as criteria ■ The following trouble spots were identified primarily about bicycling except where noted: ° Near Dimmitt Middle School the location of a pedestrian -vehicle crash 11 Crossing Sunset Blvd. near Harrington El NE Park Drive Freeway ramps El Gate on Houser Way at Kenworth 11 NE 3rd street for bikes ° Connection on Factory Ave. ° Rainier Ave. and Hardy Ave. ■ The following barriers were identified: 13 Lack of comfort in high speed/volume conditions 13 Lack of wayfinding ■ Questions focused on: Alignment with regional plans and comparison of the proposed network with other agency and city plans from entities such as the Puget Sound Regional Council (PSRC), King County, Seattle, Kent, Tukwila, and Newcastle. ° Connection of Honey Creek path alignment to Sunset Blvd. and May Creek Trail ° Connection of Thunder Hills Creek Trail to Cedar Avenue S. and Grant Avenue S. ° Opportunities for public to provide input on an ongoing basis after the planning process is complete ■ TAC members were in agreement with the projects identified in the preliminary list and the conceptual plans for intersections. Community Walking and Biking Potential A nationwide survey of sports and leisure preferences was conducted by GfK MRI in a nationally representative survey of U.S. households, and ESRI, a geospatial products company, has developed an analysis tool that compares the demographics of a community (e.g. City of Renton) to the relative likelihood that that community would have a greater likelihood to participate in the activity compared to the national average. A market potential index (MPI) of greater than 100 shows a greater likelihood than average to participate and an index of less than 100 shows a lesser likelihood. ai11January 2019 Renton I Renton Trails and Bicycle Master Plan Public Outreach Results & Themes 17 AGENDA ITEM # 9. b) Results show that Renton households (HH) or adults are more likely than the national average to walk, run/jog, or bike. Exhibit 14. City of Renton Sports and Leisure Market Potential 2017 Product/Consumer Behavior Number of Percent MPI Adults/HHs Renton Demographic Summary 2017 Population 104,157 Population 18+ 79,702 Households 40,306 Median Household Income $69,810 Data Note: An MPI (Market Potential Index) measures the relative likelihood of the adults or households in the specified trade area to exhibit certain consumer behavior or purchasing patterns compared to the U.S. An MPI of 100 represents the U.S. average. Source: These data are based upon national propensities to use various products and services, applied to local demographic composition. Usage data were collected by GfK MRI in a nationally representative survey of U.S. households. Esri forecasts for 2017. ai11January 2019 Renton I Renton Trails and Bicycle Master Plan Public Outreach Results & Themes 18 AGENDA ITEM # 9. b) B. REGIONAL TRAIL DESIGN & INTERSECTIONS AGENDA ITEM # 9. b) AGENDA CITY OF RENTON TRAILS & BICYCLE MASTER PLAN 0001DOO Renton Trails and Bicycle Master Plan Update King County/City of Renton Regional Trail Discussion #1 September 22, 2017 11:00amto2:00pm Renton City Hall Meeting Summary Participants King County Parks (KC) Kevin Brown, Director, Parks and Recreation Division Jean White, Government Relations Administrator Sujata Goel, Government Relations Administrator Frank Overton, Capital Projects Managing Supervisor Tri Ong, Capital Project Manager— Parks Engineer, PE Mike Ullmer, Project/Program Manager Jason Rich, Capital Project Manager City of Renton (COR) Vicki Grover, Transportation Planning & Programming Manager Leslie Betlach, Parks Planning and Natural Resources Director Angie Mathias, Long Range Planner Kelly Beymer, Community Services Administrator Jim Seitz, Transportation Systems Director Cailin Hunsaker, Parks and Golf Director Consultant Team (MR) Connie Reckord, MacLeod Reckord (MR) David Saxen, MacLeod Reckord (MR) Aaron Gooze, Fehr and Peers (FP) Purpose The purpose of this meeting was to collaborate with King County representatives on possible and preferred routing for the (Eastside Rail Corridor, Lake To Sound, and Cedar River) regional trails through the City of Renton, discuss alternative facility types for these corridors, update on the status of the Civic Core planning effort and review proposed cross sections for the corridors b) AGENDA ITEM # 9. b) in that plan, and review the status of other regional trails/routes (Soos Creek, Lake Washington Loop). This is the first of two planned meetings, with the expectation there will be resolution on the alignment and facility designation for the regional trails by the end of the second meeting. Discussion DESIGN CONCEPT • After introductions, and statement of purpose and goals, MacLeod Reckord presented the preferred and alternative alignments for the Eastside Rail Corridor (ERC), Lake to Sound (LTS), and Cedar River (CR) Trails through the City. Rationale was given for selection of the preferred route and there was general consensus on those routes early in the meeting. • The range of facility types for regional trails was presented by MacLeod Reckord and discussed. It was noted the KC standard of shared use path with gravel shoulders would not be appropriate in the urban segments of the corridors, and alternative standards showing a protected bike lane and sidewalk were discussed. • KC representatives stated support not only for making strong connections through the downtown core with the regional trail alignment, but also for alternative facility standards such as the protected bike lane and sidewalk cross section. SUPPORT FOR THE VISION • KC described the very successful partnerships that are being established with the business community and stakeholders along the ERC (Microsoft, REI, Google, Swedish named) through Redmond, Kirkland, Bellevue, and encouraged Renton to engage with the Eastside Greenway Alliance to work with third parties who could provide additional support for development of these trail corridors. KC offered to provide points of contact. Renton businesses mentioned as being important stakeholders in these discussions included Boeing, Paccar, Hyatt, and numerous smaller (new) tech companies (5300jobs) coming into the area. • The Rotary Club and the Chamber of Commerce were identified as potential stakeholders who could provide plan support and engage with businesses. • Ferry (foot) service to Lake Washington is in discussion and would be another benefit supporting improvements to the non -motorized system in the vicinity of the lake. • KC recommended the Redmond Central Connector powerpoint presentation as a good visual and marketing tool for promoting and securing businesses/stakeholders to support the concept of trail construction through the business core. • Pop-up events, simulations, visuals can be more compelling than simple identification of 'projects'. The prospect of a fuselage chugging through town on a flatbed was noted as highly unique and extraordinary by visitors (less so by locals); the idea of locating bleachers and posting schedules for its arrival was kicked around and not dismissed entirely. The overall message in this conversation was these are examples of some of the unique aspects of Renton that should be embraced, marketed, and displayed. 2 AGENDA ITEM # 9. b) BOEING • Boeing has developed segments of trail along the future proposed ERC corridor but the segments are private "behind the fence". Some opportunities to engage with Boeing to encourage them to collaborate with King County and the City of Renton on a public trail were identified: o There are employee groups (trail advocates) that are supportive of public/regional trail connections through this segment — identify and engage them. o Boeing likely has trip reduction requirements that need to be met as well as a regional trail facility in immediate proximity to their facility. • City of Renton clarified that Boeing's requirement for providing public trail access on their property is only a condition in the EIS once they are at full expansion. BNSF • The challenges along the BNSF corridor were discussed. KC had some success at one point getting BNSF to talk about the option of extending the ERC trail in the BNSF corridor adjacent to Coulon Park, but discussions ceased; since then there has been no response from the railroad. The City of Renton has had similar challenges. • In addition, KC has not yet obtained leases from BNSF for the Lake to Sound Trail connecting Tukwila to Renton. It would be desirable to extend the Lake to Sound Trail along the BNSF corridor to the east toward Rainier Avenue. Options discussed included approaching the private property owners to the south of the BNSF ROW (many have loading zones, parking areas in this area) to see if there is potential for a narrow area of acquisition. It was noted that there are several sidings that the adjacent property owners don't want to lose because they represent value or potential value to tenants. • The City of Renton confirmed that railroad use is on the average of one train per day for Boeing; Rabanco also uses the line as far as Hardie/Shattuck. WSDOT, SOUND TRANSIT, OTHER • There was discussion about the current status of the Transit Center funding, and the importance of identifying and enhancing connections from the regional trail to the new location at Grady Way. • KC noted that Sound Transit is (fiscally) supportive with projects providing access within mile of the station. • KC cited working in partnership with Redmond to lobby Sound Transit on particular issues related to ERC development/access. KC agreed to work with the City of Renton regarding Sound Transit project advancement. • The City of Renton noted that Sound Transit projects are opening up in 2024; future projects included Bus Rapid Transit implementation and (WSDOT) Bellevue to Renton Bus Rapid Transit development. • KC noted the ERC to Ripley Lane connection will happen in conjunction with WSDOT widening. KC will provide information to the City of Renton. 3 AGENDA ITEM # 9. b) rl\/Ir rnRF • Fehr and Peers provided background and input on the status of the Civic Core project, specifically focusing on the corridors identified for regional trail connections. The Civic Core process is moving ahead of the Trails Plan schedule, so it is imperative there is resolution on these issues and agreement between the two plans. • There was considerable discussion about the merits of the various cross sections and alternative configurations along the "Burnett Trail" segment. Specifically where, and whether transit and parking were to be provided; where the best location for raingardens and tree planting would occur; sidewalk, parking, and travel lane widths. • King County encouraged Renton to connect the Burnett Trail to the relocated Transit Center at Grady Way. • The City of Renton will provide Fehr and Peers with traffic count information in order to more fully evaluate Burnett Avenue north of Second Avenue and south of Third Avenue to 5t" Street. OTHER TRAIL CORRIDOR DESIGN ISSUES • Some design concepts that will be considered along the Burnett Trail include: o Reduction of travel lanes to 11'. o Possible elimination of center turn lane between Second and Third. o Configuring protected bike lane in a way that provides greater separation from travel lanes. o Ensuring walkway does not become 'cluttered', with effective width being constrained, with utility poles, mailboxes, light poles, benches/amenities, hydrants, etc. Provide adequate width and create pockets for these amenities/infrastructure. o Relocation of play area to accommodate trail through park. • Review opportunities for enhancing/celebrating the 3 nodes/points of the triangle where trails converge. • Identify and address other big challenge areas, one named in particular was the Logan and Burnett intersection. • The City of Renton noted there is potential for vacating parking on the south side of Houser — it has been discussed at Council level. • Be sure to include alternative alignments in preferred plan, as those routes may be used as interim routes. • The City of Renton will provide information being generated by Otak on the design of the Logan and Airport Way intersection. OTHER ISSUES • King County noted that the Soos Creek Trail connections are not off the table, just lower on the priority list for now. • The City of Renton noted that the one Trail the public desires the most is completing the Soos Creek Trail north of 192nd. 4 AGENDA ITEM # 9. b) Next Steps: The next meeting will include: o Formalizing the preferred option for connecting the ERC, Lake to Sound, and Cedar River Trail. o Identifying alternative routes for each of the three regional trails. o Identifying trail cross sections for varying segments of both the preferred and alternative routes. o Providing conceptual cross sections noting ROW width at strategic locations along the alignment, for purposes of identifying critical challenges that may be to be addressed by multiple parties. o Identifying how both the Trails plan and the Civic Core plan will show corresponding project improvements through the corridors identified for the regional trails. The second coordination meeting is scheduled for Tuesday, October 24, 2017, from 9:OOam to 11:OOam at Renton City Hall. 5 AGENDA CITY OF RENTON TRAILS & BICYCLE MASTER PLAN 0001DOO Renton Trails and Bicycle Master Plan Update Renton/King County Regional Trail Discussion #2 October 24, 2017 9:00 am to 11:00 am Renton City Hall Meeting Summary Participants King County Parks (KC) Kevin Brown, Director, Parks and Recreation Division Jean White, Government Relations Administrator, DNRP/Parks, Capital Planning and Land Management Sujata Goel, Government Relations Administrator Tri Ong, Capital Project Manager— Parks Engineer, PE Mike Ullmer, Project/Program Manager Jason Rich, Capital Project Manager City of Renton (COR) Vicki Grover, Transportation Planning & Programming Manager Jim Seitz, Transportation Systems Director Kelly Beymer, Community Services Administrator Leslie Betlach, Parks Planning and Natural Resources Director Angie Mathias, Long Range Planning Manager Cailin Hunsaker, Parks & Golf Course Director Consultant Team (MR) Connie Reckord, MacLeod Reckord (MR) David Saxen, MacLeod Reckord (MR) Aaron Gooze, Fehr and Peers (FP) Purpose The purpose of this meeting was to reconvene with King County representatives to discuss and resolve preferred routing for the (Eastside Rail Corridor, Lake to Sound, and Cedar River) regional trails through the City of Renton, identify the most likely facility type for each of the corridors identified in the route, discuss strategies for implementation, and provide an update b) AGENDA ITEM # 9. b) on the status of the Civic Core planning effort. This is the second of two planned meetings and is expected to result in decisions that will be carried forward in the final recommendations presented in the Renton Trails and Bicycle Master Plan Update. Discussion INTRODUCTION AND RECAP • After introductions, MacLeod Reckord provided an overview of what had been discussed and decided in the first meeting, held on September 22, 2017. Some discussion ensued regarding the schedule for review/approval and adoption of the Civic Core Plan and the importance of resolving solutions that would be consistent for both planning efforts. Currently the three regional trails do not connect and stop at or near the downtown core area. • MacLeod Reckord provided an explanation of the Regional Trail alignment graphics, noting the plan and sections identify two of the regional trail corridors — Lake to Sound Trail and Eastside Rail Corridor. The network shows connection to the existing Cedar River Trail but no extension of the Cedar River Trail was proposed. • The graphics also show alternative alignments, but without corresponding sections illustrating proposed facility types along those routes, the rationale being that the range of possible options was so great as to be difficult to determine the best facility type for the entire corridor (e.g.: was the alternative route a short-term or long-term option; would this be an interim route or the final route; what would the funding source be; what other likely development scenarios along the route would impact facility design; etc.) • The trail alignments include sections defined by distinctive attributes. Each section provides one or more options representing slightly different trail locations or optional facility types. See the boards (attached) for additional information on challenges and benefits of each option. LAKE TO SOUND TRAIL • SECTION 1—The western segment extending from the planned end of trail near Naches Ave SW to Hardie Ave SW. The recommended alignment is on the south side of the rail lines, with options to locate the trail high on the embankment (same elevation at the tracks and between the main and spur lines), or low on the embankment (removing the spur line). An optional alignment on the north side of the mainline is described. Major points of discussion among the group: o Whether the spur could in fact be vacated (need to coordinate with BNSF); understanding the volume/frequency of use of spur line; whether Rabanco still uses this line; and whether property acquisition (south) is possible if spur line cannot be vacated. o All options (n/s, high/low) may need to be put forth to BNSF for discussion and will be included as a record of the process (appendix items). o The new BNSF contact may be more receptive to discussion of a joint use of corridor. There was a recommendation to convene a meeting with local BNSF 2 AGENDA ITEM # 9. b) representative(s); King County would be the lead). A multi -jurisdictional approach may be more effective with an appeal to changing community needs — more non - motorized connectivity and increased rail/trail development nationwide. o Businesses in this corridor include an auto dealership, a strip mall, light industrial, a county health building, and office buildings. Security will continue to be a concern as there are transients. King County indicated there may be a possibility of an easement acquisition if businesses are willing. o The option showing the trail between the main line and spur line was determined most undesirable, as it would require numerous acute approaches to rail crossings and would be well inside the set back/clearance zone defined by BNSF for both the main and spur lines. • SECTION 2 —The middle -west segment located between Hardie Ave SW and Rainier Ave S. Recommended alignment is on the south side of the rail lines, again with options high on the embankment or low on the embankment. Optional north side of mainline was also considered. Major points of discussion included: o Show all options (n/s, high/low) when in discussion with BNSF; Hardie Ave crossing can be at grade; Rainier Ave S crossing would be better above grade. • SECTION 3 —The middle east segment located between Rainier Ave S and Burnett Ave S. Recommended alignment is on the south side with options high on the embankment or located in the Houser Way ROW as a shared street. Major points of discussion included: o High bank is preferred to maintain continuity to the west, especially if BNSF has approved high bank alignment further west. The Houser Way ROW shared street could be an inexpensive interim (or long term) solution. o A Woonerf concept was well received by the North Riverside Drive residents along the Cedar River Trail and may also be well received here. • SECTION 4 — The Houser Street corridor Recommended alignment is on the south side of the street, changing from shared use path to pedestrian/protected bike lanes configuration due to significant reduction in available space. Major points of discussion include: o North vs. south for non -motorized improvements will be an issue questioned by businesses along this segment and will require further evaluation of north vs south with pros/cons; state rationale for choice. o Some noted observations — south side leads directly to Cedar River Trail connection and Tonkin Park is on the south side. o There are concerns about the NACTO minimal width (8') shown for a 2-way protected bike lane; consider leaving a 6' walk and dedicating 10' (with lighting/amenities in this zone) for bikes. o There was considerable discussion and a variety of opinions about how and whether to delineate/separate uses to include providing a visual only barrier between pedestrians and bikes; providing no distinction between bikes and pedestrian users making it less like a bike facility; creating mixing zones at intersections; and providing some type of vertical separation between bikes and the rail. 3 AGENDA ITEM # 9. b) o A second option might include elimination of parking/vehicular. Eliminating parking would need to be promoted by characterizing options for a more 'interesting and attractive' street. o The high crown of the street will impact the street cross section, curbs and drainage as the rail segment is higher than the finish floor elevation of the adjacent businesses. The current section as shown is not possible. o Options for a connection to the Cedar River Trail were discussed and will be further evaluated in the conceptual study for the intersections of the regional trails (in the main body of the Trails Plan). EAST SIDE RAIL CORRIDOR • SECTION 1— N 61" Street to Park Avenue N The recommended solution is unclear and dependent upon further discussions with Boeing and having a better understanding of future road widening efforts. Major points of discussion include: o Limited space requires either construction outside existing ROW onto Boeing property through acquisition or easements, or rechannelization of existing roadway to accommodate a side path. o If the trail is located outside the existing ROW high level discussions will be required between the City and Boeing and in the future may involve the mayor and other regional leaders to include King County. Renton will coordinate with King County regarding this approach. o Accommodating a facility inside the existing ROW is likely a non -starter, as City has plans for lane expansion of Logan through this segment. Note: the existing ROW width will not accommodate the lane expansion without additional ROW acquisition. • SECTION 2 — Park Ave N to Garden Ave N Recommended side path on west side, where adequate room exists without requiring acquisition or making changes to existing roadway channelization. Major points of discussion include: o Logan/Park is already a level F intersection. o Existing bike lanes on both sides of roadway could be eliminated with the addition of side path on west side; question asked how bikes would access the landing from the ERC — crossings would have to occur at Garden Ave N or Park Avenue N; it was suggested that additional roadway width captured from dropping bike lanes could go to boulevard planting. CIVIC CORE PROJECT There was some discussion about the proposals being considered for the Civic Core Project ("Burnett Trail" segment), with acknowledgement that there would be coordination on final recommendations between the two projects. Discussion included: o Burnett Trail connecting at Houser Way. o Burnett Trail as the link to the relocated South Renton Transit Center 4 AGENDA ITEM # 9. b) o Burnett Trail extending north to the Cedar River Trail and crossing at Logan Avenue to the Lake Washington Loop Trail. PRODUCT FOR FINAL REPORT • Lake to Sound Trail Plan — show all discussed recommended alignments; redline alignment as currently shown, green line low bank, yellow line north side to make options clear. Show cross sections reflecting these options. Identify options that seem viable at this stage. • Eastside Rail Corridor — show connections through the Civic Core planning area, with reference to that planning effort. • Show alternative alignments on the plan so as not to eliminate them from consideration if preferred alignments cannot be achieved. • State pros/cons of all options. • These exhibits, including meeting notes, will be a standalone in the report appendix. Next Steps: • City/King County will continue to plan for discussions with BNSF and Boeing. • Plans will be coordinated with those being developed for the Civic Core project. • Cross sections will be further developed to reflect the additional options discussed for the segments noted above. These cross sections and revised plans will be included in the appendix of the final report. 5 AGENDA ITEM # 9. b) =vo _ a= w d w Q d¢ V 3N any uoiuN IN env uoiry - a, p [k O E y yD V L O O o W U W Y - Y^ jam UZ.° avv yarn mWxt •• oc '� w = l • 3 u as o'a • • ® ��♦♦ ..... ...................... y de�aY\L°::�;::♦ o y ' ♦ eto ° � : o'♦^ i I of v tc of ♦♦..•••..♦ ♦ may. •. ♦ 1 . It ~ m 3 Y a, Z k-oop ail m° n9t°n m �♦ N Nt In ■ /L y/ ♦ W O '3 p a, W ♦� Y 1 ; AL W 0 ° v Z Lu l Opia. a •M/ c 0 � NDA ITEM # 9. b) Q` 1 adF— OW C Im Z im U� a as W d W HU Z QO WU 0-0 a0 6yV�i EXISTING LOW BANK RAIL WITH TRAIL HIGH BANK RAIL WITH TRAIL HIGH BANK RAIL WITH TRAIL, NORTH SIDE AGENDA ITEM # 9. b) Shared Use Path • Requires removal of spur line • May be able to meet BNSF min. 30' setback from main line • No trail crossing of main line • Barrier fence on north side of trail • Less grading • Some retaining walls may be required • At -grade road crossings in three locations • Abandoned spurs could serve as access points be- tween the Naches Avenue connection and Burnett Avenue Shared Use Path • Proximity of trail to main line conflicts with BNSF's guidelines (min. 30' from track centerline) • Retains spur line • Pinch points between main line and spur line allow 12' to 13' for development • Requires crossing the spur line at an acute angle (or track removal at east end) • Retaining walls required • Barrier fence both sides of trail • No trail crossing of main line • Requires three new or retrofitted bridges • No access points between the Naches Ave connec- tion and Burnett Ave Shared Use Path • Proximity of trail to main line conflicts with BNSF's guidelines (min. 30' from track centerline) • High bank alignment until Shattuck Ave • Retains spur line • Requires crossing the main line • Wider and flatter grade at west end of segment • Barrier fence south side of trail • Requires at least one new or retrofitted bridge • Possible access points at SW 5th Place (north side), Hardie Avenue, and Shattuck Avenue. LAKE TO SOUND TRAIL - SECTION 1 REGIONAL TRAIL ALTERNATIVES ME EXISTING 100' ROW LOW BANK RAIL WITH TRAIL HIGH BANK RAIL WITH TRAIL Approx. Clearance required for train 16' Wide Trail AGENDA ITEM # 9. b) Shared Use Path • Moderate fill or structure required • Barrier rail/fence both sides of trail (structure de- pendent) • Less grading but potentially more structure • May be able to meet BNSF min. 30' setback from main line • Bridges may need to be higher than trail elevation to meet clearance requirements (Hardie Ave and Rainier Ave) Shared Use Path • Proximity of trail to main line conflicts with BNSF's guidelines (min. 30' from track centerline) • Significant fill or structure required • Possible encroachment on adjacent property • Barrier fence on north side of trail • Bridges at same elevation as trail HIGH BANK RAIL WITH TRAIL, NORTH SIDE Shared Use Path 16' Wide Trail 1� Irr • Proximity of trail to main line conflicts with BNSF's guidelines (min. 30' from track centerline) • High bank alignment until Shattuck Ave • Significant fill or structure required • Retains spur line • Requires crossing the main line • Wider and flatter grade at west end of segment • Barrier fence south side of trail • Requires at least one new or retrofitted bridge • Possible access points at SW 5th Place (north side), Hardie Avenue, and Shattuck Avenue. LAKE TO SOUND TRAIL - SECTION 2 ■ REGIONAL TRAIL ALTERNATIVES EXISTING CS' PMAI ICE RMA/ HIGH BANK RAIL WITH TRAIL Shared Use Path • Proximity of trail to main line conflicts with BNSF's guidelines (min. 30' from track centerline) • Makes use of existing maintenance of way road within BNSF right of way • Retains current function of Houser Way • Minimal grading • Barrier fence on north side of trail • Proximity to Main Line more problematic for BNSF AT -GRADE TRAIL Shared Street • Requires "Shared Street" treatment of Houser Way • Impacts access for 2-3 property owners • Minimal grading • No barrier fence required • Meets BNSF min. 30' setback from main line 9. b) LAKE TO SOUND TRAIL - SECTION 3 REGIONAL TRAIL ALTERNATIVES EXISTING 50' ROW Approx. clearance required for train i I i i TRAIL WITH SEPARATED MODES, SOUTH SIDE 8' 8' Bike Walk TRAIL WITH SEPARATED MODES, NORTH SIDE Shared Use Path - Separated Modes • Remove parking from the south side of Houser Way • Minimal buffer between trail envelope and trail • Maintain building access along sidewalk • Provide a two-way bicycle facility adjacent to the pe- destrian walkway/sidewalk • Separate bicycle and pedestrian traffic through pav- ing materials, a yellow tactile strip and/or a grade change • Separate the bike lanes and railroad tracks with some type of barrier, such as delineators, a curb or plant- ers, but provide locations where pedestrians can cross Houser Way freely • Intersections will require bicycle signals Shared Use Path - Separated Modes • Remove parking from the north side of Houser Way • Allows 2' buffer between trail envelope and trail • Maintain building access along sidewalk • Provide a two-way bicycle facility adjacent to the pe- destrian walkway/sidewalk • Separate bicycle and pedestrian traffic through pav- ing materials, a yellow tactile strip and/or a grade change • Separate the bike lanes and railroad tracks with some type of barrier, such as delineators, a curb or plant- ers, but provide locations where pedestrians can cross Houser Way freely • Intersections will require bicycle signals 9. b) LAKE TO SOUND TRAIL - SECTION 4 REGIONAL TRAIL ALTERNATIVES ME 9. b) EXISTING 56' ROW OUTSIDE CITY ROW WITHIN CITY ROW Side Path • Requires acquisition or easement from Boeing • Potential coordination with Boeing's trail • No change to Logan Ave travel lanes, turn lane or east side sidewalk Side Path • Entirely within the Logan Ave ROW • No impact to adjacent properties • Eliminates turn lane • No change to east side sidewalk EASTSIDE RAIL CORRIDOR TRAIL - SECTION 1 REGIONAL TRAIL ALTERNATIVES 9. b) EXISTING PROPOSED Side Path • No property acquisition required • Requires no change to travel lanes • Existing bike lanes remain EASTSIDE RAIL CORRIDOR TRAIL - SECTION 2 REGIONAL TRAIL ALTERNATIVES of AGENDA ITEM # 9. b) 12 0 O v L u m N C Ul L U O L N 3 1O v�i 3 0 w ° F O C Y u 01 Y O O N � N G1 d O 0 m Jf0 N `3 00 N J LL C -� Y N V C R >'n N Y u Z h O w 3 -Q u b o m C p) on c a v m v o c o v no ° y O > O p O o A C Q 3 -V a L 3 w 3oj E wcL g 0 '°' v E O i N 3 O O N c L on Y a a0 F co2 H 2 � IA u n' C J v) z= W ae 99 ! LLr� '.6 U.0 AGENDA ITEM # 9. b) 3 O N 6H w Y zo a� 0 O 6 w -2 w Y N J c O y co p Q o=n Y O m -O O a m w w 0 O R N w Nw Y a Y O_ w a3= Y oo uVi = on m 6c a o awi v to ° 'n w uw o °3 s O N 00-a`w as w ow a rv� pT m c a v a' °' a ° 3 >3o oL3 w uo� w 3 w O i N 3 a w 7 6 7 C p Apo E w w w 0 3= V 0 3 o v i w ` = v u oL._ m rm x Hxv. of in u 3 O S any Pauan8 v 0 I AGENDA ITEM # 9. b) a o� n v Q L -0 4t T N U N c 3 n c t i o r_ o n w N � c C c U 'F v is 6 n m o to N o J m o Y N L Y O O m N O N Z c u -o j n O ` OO -(u 0 u b0 3 m Y F w u 'O N L G d N c _ T 3 G p O` 7 0 j ' O '6 L N O- d N > N m Y N t m o 3 u c °' Y+ o O d p O m u�'i Q v C o m r H F UO m vLi •v AGENDA ITEM # 9. b) o v u 0 0 Z C a 0 a o J O C c N O O L C ` O L CL L d O O 41 bD C m C N v y O 6 C 6 O 'O U v > 1n V a) cz 3 a v '3 o � 3 o v W c-I � = W c-I �n =V W AGENDA ITEM # 9. b) v U N O O Z O t y pq co O 0 N C C O O s p v F O• L O fl L O_ O 7 OU m O U1 3 o a 6 y v o a v v > n u a16e � � f6 oc0e � m .. NO 3 0 w W e-I 10' = W ,Qq zz c vie u� ` otWe 020 m :o U:0 r c i 0 a O c� a� .i hit 1 PF AGENDA ITEM # 9. b) v 0 0 Z i c O CL O c� L O m aj m r_ aj Q G 1 Mo�i�^^ •^7 W O V �1 H L a, c CL V 0 AGENDA ITEM # 9. b) v O O Z c O d C C V N � m O Y _ 6 M i� c Au V L V1 M CL if O > CL 08 N N O s�0 m Y 2 . • `H y 10 o 'O to N L - O Y l0 U •6 s O Q L Y J V) Y • ' Y f0 f0 �+ V N N Y O O o a ca cu � O � 3 •3�m ♦- (V Y IIIIQ! 11111111 S @many II!W ! to v =_ o N y � J H C AGENDA ITEM # 9. b) C. PROJECT SHEETS AGENDA ITEM # 9. b) AGENDA ITEM # 9. b) C. PROJECT SHEETS INTRODUCTION The proposed trails and bicycle network comprises individual routes or segments that connect at intersections to form the low stress network. Most of the routes follow streets and are within the public right of way. Some existing and proposed segments are within private or quasi -public property, such as utility company property, and require agreements and/or easements to be im- plemented. Other network segments are within Renton Parks property. Projects are defined as contiguous segments of a route serving a neighborhood, connecting im- portant destinations, such as schools or transit stops, or completing gaps in regional trails. They are generally scaled to implementable in one or two phases. Most projects have one contiguous non -motorized facility type, but some have two or more facility types due to differing right of way characteristics or property constraints. The project sheets are arranged alphabetically. CONCEPTUAL COST ESTIMATES Project costs for bicycle and pedestrian facilities will vary greatly depending on right of way characteristics, cost of materials, the specific facility design and scope of the improvements. When available, an order of magnitude cost range is provided for each project. EXISTING CROSS-SECTION The existing cross-section description for each project includes the lane configuration, but not the dimensions of the lanes or curb -to -curb distance. The methodology employed in this plan uses the number of travel lanes as one of the factors that determines the level of traffic stress for a route. Travel lane width can affect vehicle speeds, and thus the bicycle level of traffic stress, but was not inventoried and is not documented on the project sheets. Cross-section information is for typical street segments and does not take into account turn lanes and additional through lanes that often occur at intersections. SPEED LIMIT Vehicle speeds are also one of the factors used to determine the existing level of traffic stress of a route. Where relevant, existing posted speed limits are provided for each project. FACILITY TYPES A range of facility types to achieve a low -stress trails and bicycle network are proposed in this plan. The facility types assigned to different projects are conceptual design guidelines and not specific to the exact dimensions and condition of each right of way or easement. In some cases, one or more alternate facility types are suggested that may provide more separation from traffic and result in a safer, more comfortable facility. Additional feasibility studies will be required to AGENDA ITEM # 9. b) verify the suitability of each facility prior to project implementation. These studies may address property acquisition, roadway channelization or widening, and on -street parking modification, among other issues. Each facility type also has design variations that will need to be considered upon design devel- opment of the project. For example, protected bike lanes can have a range of treatments for the barrier separating the bicycle facility from the vehicle travel lanes, such as delineator posts, planter boxes, or concrete barriers. Selection of a variant will generally depend on the safety, cost, and return on investment of the project. LOCATION MAPS Each location map shows the proposed project segment or segments. AGENDA ITEM # 9. b) PROJECT SHEET INDEX 1) 1 16th Avenue SE Bike Lanes.......................................................................................................................1 2) 128th Avenue SE Bike Lanes.......................................................................................................................2 3) 156th Avenue SE Bike Lanes.......................................................................................................................3 4) Benson Drive S/108th Avenue SE Shared Use Path...............................................................................4 5) Benson Neighborhood Greenway.............................................................................................................5 6) Benson Road S/Main Avenue S Bike Lanes..............................................................................................6 7) Cascade Waterline Spur Trail....................................................................................................................7 8) Cedar to Sammamish Trail..........................................................................................................................8 9) Duvall Avenue NE Bike Lanes......................................................................................................................9 10) East Valley Road Shared Use Path...................................................................................................... 10 1 1) Eastside Rail Corridor............................................................................................................................. 11 1 2) Edmonds Avenue Connector.................................................................................................................. 12 1 3) Garden Avenue N Shared Use Path.................................................................................................... 13 14) Glencoe Neighborhood Greenway..................................................................................................... 14 15) Grant Avenue Neighborhood Greenway........................................................................................... 15 1 6) Hardie Avenue Bike Lane & Shared Use Path................................................................................... 16 17) Harrington Avenue NE Neighborhood Greenway............................................................................ 17 18) Highlands Hillclimb.................................................................................................................................. 18 19) Hillcrest Neighborhood Greenway...................................................................................................... 19 20) Honey Creek Trail Extensions................................................................................................................ 20 21) Houser Way and Factory Avenue........................................................................................................ 21 22) Houser Way N Shared Use Path.......................................................................................................... 22 23) Jericho Avenue NE Bike Lanes............................................................................................................... 23 24) Kennydale Neighborhood Greenway................................................................................................. 24 25) Kennydale Signed Shared Roadway................................................................................................... 25 26) Kenyon -Dobson Trail and Trailhead.................................................................................................... 26 27) Lake to Sound Trail: East Segment....................................................................................................... 27 28) Lake to Sound Trail: West Segment..................................................................................................... 28 29) Lake Washington Loop Trail.................................................................................................................. 29 30) Langston Road/SW 134th Street Hillclimb........................................................................................ 30 31) Logan Avenue N Shared Use Path....................................................................................................... 31 32) Maplewood Heights Neighborhood Greenway................................................................................ 32 33) May Creek Hillclimb............................................................................................................................... 33 34) May Creek Trail....................................................................................................................................... 34 35) May Valley Trail...................................................................................................................................... 35 AGENDA ITEM # 9. b) PROJECT SHEET INDEX 36) Mill Avenue S Signed Shared Roadway............................................................................................. 36 37) Monroe Avenue NE Bike Lanes.............................................................................................................. 37 38) N 4th Street Connector........................................................................................................................... 38 39) N 6th Street Bike Lanes.......................................................................................................................... 39 40) N 8th Street Shared Use Path............................................................................................................... 40 41) Naches Avenue Shared Use Path......................................................................................................... 41 42) NE 3rd Street........................................................................................................................................... 42 43) NE 4th Street Bike Lanes........................................................................................................................ 43 44) NE 12th Street Bike Lanes..................................................................................................................... 44 45) NE 16th Street Signed Shared Roadway........................................................................................... 45 46) NE Sunset Boulevard Shared Use Path.............................................................................................. 46 47) Nile Avenue NE Bike Lanes.................................................................................................................... 47 48) North Highlands Neighborhood Greenway.......................................................................................48 49) North Southport Drive Shared Use Path.............................................................................................49 50) Oakesdale Avenue Bike Lanes.............................................................................................................. 50 51) Pacific Railroad Trailhead & Trail........................................................................................................ 51 52) Panther Creek Trail................................................................................................................................. 52 53) Powerline Trail.......................................................................................................................................... 53 54) Puget Drive Bike Lanes & Signed Shared Roadway........................................................................ 54 55) Renton Connector..................................................................................................................................... 55 56) Renton Park Neighborhood Greenway...............................................................................................56 57) S 2nd Street............................................................................................................................................. 57 58) S 3rd Street Signed Shared Roadway............................................................................................... 58 59) SSW 7th Street Transit Connector..................................................................................................... 59 60) Sam Chastain Waterfront Trail............................................................................................................. 60 61) SE 168th Street Protected Bike Lanes................................................................................................. 61 62) SE 182nd & SE 184th Streets Neighborhood Greenway............................................................... 62 63) SE Petrovitsky Road Shared Use Path................................................................................................. 63 64) Seattle Waterline Spur Trail................................................................................................................. 64 65) Seattle Waterline Trail........................................................................................................................... 65 66) Shattuck to Airport Connector............................................................................................................... 66 67) Soos Creek Trail....................................................................................................................................... 67 68) South Highlands Neighborhood Greenway.......................................................................................68 69) Springbrook Trail..................................................................................................................................... 69 70) Springbrook Trail Extension................................................................................................................... 70 AGENDA ITEM # 9. b) PROJECT SHEET INDEX 71) Sunset Boulevard Hillclimb..................................................................................................................... 71 72) SW 16th Street Shared Use Path........................................................................................................ 72 73) SW 27th Street Connector....................................................................................................................73 74) Talbot Road S Bike Route....................................................................................................................... 74 75) Thunder Creek Trail................................................................................................................................. 75 76) Tiffany -Cascade Connector Trail.......................................................................................................... 76 77) Tiffany Park Neighborhood Greenway.............................................................................................. 77 78) Tukwila Station Trail................................................................................................................................ 78 79) Union Avenue NE Bike Lanes................................................................................................................. 79 80) Wells Avenue S Signed Shared Roadway.......................................................................................... 80 AGENDA ITEM # 9.r r Lakeridge Park h"' J'S 124t a Q S N2gthst S 133rd St r r Lake Washington • N , > \ r� \ m Cedar River Trail Park N° 1 \m 1~ ,D 1� IZ 1 1 S 32nd St 'Po L6'lp-or- or r � � I I 1 , QI { Cougar Moun>n ) ..,,y....... o, re ay ildla _ al Lure o N 30th St Athletic �♦ 131 Complex •-\ CJ1 1 0ey d -€2.7�+Tt-� May 1 1 eek 1 N8 24th,S_ • 1 / McA �a-1-WL2.rfd Pl •-W -i 'IyT'• ; 1 1 Honey Creek m Z\04 1 1 �.r 1• Greenway , 1 i i; v -♦ , ; Q °� � . , k C1•/ 1 1 Gene Coulon 1 1 r----� 1 \vd 1 Memorial Beach 21 1 , ��, �� ¢t6 May Park 1 _ 1 , 1t,��-ri'H� I ,Valley County 900 ♦-- ■-� i- I'--i�-'in,tL?t.--y Q 1 Park ♦ //�}��� I • 1 IV i 1 1 1 ♦ ,rr �' ,t I � , , I ,♦ r , 1 I v 1 � \ 1 m e r z ; , NA St ;Q I 1 E 1� ' 7♦{ c. ' a „ , a, •�, CT = 1 -dyJ :--Gf}!= \Li�J_✓C, El rI l0 1 L7 1 1 St StjL� ESF. --�'-- 1* NHS- N3rdSt� d Z Cedar Rivert•i jQo LakeS}M1ish� � SE 128th St o"Ave S r m 0 - It 40 �o ' �e � _a > � Cedar 1 w 1� 1 �P CL' •--- 1 * River 1 �r Q `. * 3 •a{w el 900 •' ®° . Park Maplewood 1 LI Foster o r•r•,O .� \ GL7 1 1 Community Park arse �, Black River ; \ /fi{ Propert 1 Riparian = . LJ 'Aa,xtj Forest ��-�' rrrr� s go Riverview Park i Maplewood '---rr'♦ �J ......... a + Heights Park S 1 nth It S 7th St 1 Cedar River Natural Area ♦ s Metr �- It----�---•---"--� 515 S7th51 •-• ® Maplewood ■' Wat work • ; Golf Course �� •-,©-. De Den �oathcenter Bt�d' Tukwila Pkwy Par Spri brook 1401 \ rn Trail c" S Grady F G�J Iuy 5� Grady W lo IN eoco At At -----C/GT---- 1 , ,N 1 , eK 1 %0. ��w, Soos , i 1 3 •♦ 1 p , , r�eJo' O �, \ Creekk anc ' > , ♦ 1t-- 1 •c-�yl+-•rfi- Trail Q ♦ 3 Panther Creek GLY ♦'1•� � 1,%�y�� 7 1 o v Wetlands �T --•�.� ♦---+�EJAQW4--?i ----- - ; Q' ; ; r , ♦ , r ; Cascade ;ark ♦ , -� SW 27th Sr ; o t r Rentonlu�,, .5-68-h-----� ;-�---y----, m Wetlands , >Yk1 I Rerpt4n Park [{j SW th St 01 Al -•�---srEL I 1 1 I � � 1^ � n1 ,, •• SW 41 st St Edlund r•-}LE P&1&pyltg4"IF-*------•rr y�Y� 1 Propertyi;Rd I 1 1 •---rF. O S 18 h St SW�3r�--- 1/ I `� p 1 1 , ,O IQ 1 K � 1 1 � 1 1 1 SE 192nd ' 7 Cleveland / Richardson I S Property I Springbrook Watershed N m Q 0.5 1 Miles 167 N \ 14 o'I AA I r _] Ron Regis T Park / SE Jones Rd 169 C a J�J� Existing Trails Shared Use Path Striped Bike Lane Signed Shared Roadway Pedestrian Trail Proposed Trails •• Shared Use Path •---• Protected Bike Lane E 183rd St Striped Bike Lane • Neighborhood Greenway > Signed Shared Roadway Pedestrian Trail Parks & Open Space OCommunity Center Library N Q O Potential Transit Hub Q1 School Proposed Project Number, Name 17, Harrington Ave NE Neighborhood Greenway JF4, May Creek Trail A 51, Pacific Railroad Trailhead & Trail 68, South Highlands Neighborhood Greenway 1, 1 16th Avenue SE Bike Lanes libbinee, 18, Highlands Hillclimb 35, May Valley Trail 52, Panther Creek Trail �69, Springbrook Trail 2, 1 28th Avenue SE Bike Lanes 19, Hillcrest Neighborhood Greenway 36, Mill Avenue S Signed Shared Roadway 53, Powerline Trail 70, Springbrook Trail Extension 3, 156th Avenue SE Bike Lanes 20, Honey Creek Trail Extensions 37, Monroe Avenue NE Bike Lanes 54, Puget Drive Bike Lanes & Signed Shared Roadway 71, Sunset Boulevard Hillclimb 4, Benson Drive S/108th Avenue SE Shared Use Path 21, Houser Way and Factory Avenue 38, N 4th Street Connector Renton Connector 72, SW 16th Street Shared Use Path 5, Benson Neighborhood Greenway 62, Houser Way N Shared Use Path 39, N 6th Street Bike Lanes 56, Renton Park Neighborhood Greenway 73, SW 27th Street Connector 6, Benson Road/Main Avenue S Bike Lanes 23, Jericho Avenue NE Bike Lanes 40, N 8th Street Shared Use Path 57, S 2nd Street Protected Bike Lan 74, Talbot Road S Bike Lanes 7, Cascade Waterline Spur Trail 24, Kennydale Neighborhood Greenway 41, Naches Avenue Shared U 58, S 3rd Street Signed Shared Roadway 75, Thunder Creek Trail 8, Cedar to Sammamish Trail 25, Kennydale Signed Shared Roadway 42, NE 3rd Street 59, S/SW 7th Street Transit Connector 76, Tiffany -Cascade Connector Trail 9, Duvall Avenue NE Bike Lan 26, Kenyon -Dobson Trail and Trailhead 43, NE 4th Street Bike Lanes _A 60, Sam Chastain Waterfront Trail 77, Tiffany Park Neighborhood Greenway 10, East Valley Road Shared Use Path , Lake to Sound Trail: East Segment 44, NE 1 2th Street Bike Lanes 61, SE 168th Street Protected Bike Lanes 78, Tukwila Station Trail 11, Eastside Rail Corridor 28, Lake to Sound Trail: West Segment 45, NE 16th Street Signed Shared Roadway 62, SE 182nd & 184th Streets Neighborhood Greenway 79, Union Avenue NE Bike Lanes 12, Edmonds Avenue Connect 29, Lake Washington Loop Trail 46, NE Sunset Blvd Shared Use Path 11� 63, SE Petrovitsky Road Shared Use Path 00, Wells Avenue S Signed Shared Roadway 13, Garden Avenue N Shared Use Path _ 30, Langston Road/SW 134th Street Hillclimb 47, Nile Avenue NE Bike Lanes 64, Seattle Waterline Spur Trail 14, Glencoe Neighborhood Greenway 31, Logan Avenue N Shared Use Path 48, North Highlands Neighborhood Greenway 65, Seattle Waterline Trail ■ Identified Priority Project 15, Grant Avenue Neighborhood Greenway 32, Maplewood Heights Neighborhood Greenway 49, North Southport Drive Shared Use Path 66, Shattuck to Airport Connector 16, Hardie Avenue Bike Lane & Shared Use Path 33, May Creek Hillclimb 50, Oakesdale Avenue Bike Lanes 67, Soos Creek Trail 1) 1 16th Avenue SE Bike Lanes Project Description Build bike lanes along 1 16th Avenue SE. Consider buffered bike lanes where ROW width permits. Limits Puget Drive SE to SE 192nd Street (City Limits) (Start/End) Length 2.49 miles Destinations • Cascade Elementary School (North to South) I • Cascade Vista Athletic Club Ball Fields • Post Office • Benson Hill Elementary School • Family First Center (proposed) Connections I • Seattle Waterline Trail (proposed #65) (North to South) I • Puget Drive SE Bike Lanes (proposed #54) • Tiffany Park Neighborhood Greenway (proposed #77) • Cascade Waterline Spur Trail (proposed #7 ) • Benson Neighborhood Greenway (proposed #5) • SE 1 68th Street Protected Bike Lanes (proposed #61) • SE Petrovitsky Road Shared Use Path (proposed #63) • SE 182 & 1 84th Streets Neighborhood Greenway (proposed #62) Cost I $$$$ ($1.5M - $5M) Existing Cross- 1 lane in each direction, center turn lane where Section needed Speed Limit 30 MPH Considerations Recommendation consistent with the Benson Hill Community Plan. Location Map Facility Bike Lane Alternate Facility m Z V 0 Buffered Bike Lane tO r 2) 128th Avenue SE Bike Lanes Project Description Build bike lanes from SE 164th Street to SE Petrovitsky Road. Consider shared use path where sidewalks are missing. Limits SE 164th Street to SE Petrovitsky Road (Start/End) Length 0.71 miles Destinations • Lindbergh High School (North to South) • Renton Park Elementary School M Connections • Benson Neighborhood Greenway (proposed #5) (North to South) • SE 168th Street Protected Bike Lanes (proposed #61) • Renton Park Neighborhood Greenway (proposed #56) • SE Petrovitsky Road Shared Use Path (proposed #63) Cost $$$ ($500,000 - $1.5 M) Existing Cross- 1 lane in each direction Section Speed Limit 25 MPH Considerations The segment from SE 169th Place to SE Petrovitsky Road currently has shoulders that function as walkways. Sidewalks would need to be constructed for exclusive bike lanes to be feasible. Location Map Facility Bike Lane Alternate Facility Shared Use Path 3) 156th Avenue SE Bike Lanes Project Description Build bike lanes from NE 4th Street south along 156th Avenue SE to the intersection of SE 142nd Place and 154th Place SE (City Limits). Develop signed shared roadway on 156th Avenue SE and SE 144th Street to 160th Avenue SE (City Limits) Limits NE 4th Street and 155th Avenue SE to the intersec- (Start/End) tion of SE 142nd Place and 154th Place SE and the intersection of SE 144th Street and 160th Avenue SE. Length 1.46 miles (0.84 within Renton City Limits) Destinations Cedar River to Lake Sammamish Trail Site Park (North to South) Connections NE 4th Street Bike Lanes (existing and proposed (North to South) #43) • Cedar to Sammamish Trail (proposed #8) • Maplewood Heights Neighborhood Greenway M (proposed #32) Cost $$ ($100,000 - $500,000) Existing Cross- 1 lane in each direction, center turn lane Section Speed Limit 35 MPH Considerations Location Map Facility l G Bike Lane Alternate Facility a a o � o Signed Shared Roadway Signed Shared Roadway �?1 j 4) Benson Drive S/108th Avenue SE Shared Use Path Project Description Construct a shared use path on the west side of Benson Drive S from S Grady Way to SE Petrovitsky Road and on 108th Avenue SE from SE Petrovitsky Road to SE 1 92nd Street. Limits S Grady Way to SE 1 92nd Street (Start/End) Length 3.17 miles Destinations • City Hall (North to South) • Proposed Transit Center • Thomas Teasdale Park • Talbot Hill Elementary School Connections I • Renton Connector (proposed #55) (North to South) • SSW 7th Street Transit Connector (proposed #59) • Talbot Road S Bike Lanes (proposed #74) • Benson Neighborhood Greenway (proposed #5) • SE Petrovitsky Road Shared Use Path (proposed #63) • SE 1 82nd & 1 84th Streets Neighborhood Greenway (proposed #62) Cost $$$$$ (Over $5M) Existing Cross- Benson Drive: 2 lanes in each direction Section 108th Avenue SE: 2 lanes in each direction, center turn lane Speed Limit 40 MPH Considerations WSDOT jurisdiction (SR 515). Traffic volumes and speeds are too high and the roadway too con- strained for standard bike lanes. Location Map Facility m Z v a oP° Shared Use Path tO IM 5) Benson Neighborhood Greenway Project Description Develop a neighborhood greenway along S 23rd Street, S 27th Street, and SE 164th Street between Talbot Road S and the planned Soos Creek Trail. Limits Talbot Road S to 1 32nd Place SE (City Limits) (Start/End) Length 2.45 miles Destinations • Talbot Hill Elementary School (West to East) I • Thomas Teasdale Park • Renton Academy • Fred Nelsen Middle School • Cascade Elementary School • Cascade Park I• Lindbergh High School Connections Panther Creek Trail (proposed #52) (West to East) Talbot Road S Bike Lanes (proposed #74) • Benson Drive S/108th Avenue SE Shared Use Path (proposed #4) • Benson Road Bike Lanes (proposed #6) • 1 16th Avenue SE Bike Lanes (proposed #1) • Tiffany Park Neighborhood Greenway (proposed #77) • 1 28th Avenue SE Bike Lanes (proposed #2) • Seattle Waterline Trail (proposed #65) • Soos Creek Trail (proposed #67) Cost $$$ ($500,000 - $1.5M) Existing Cross- 1 lane in each direction Section I Speed Limit 25 MPH Considerations Location Map Facility Neighborhood Greenway 6) Benson Road S/Main Avenue S Bike Lanes Project Description Complete gaps in bike lanes between Houser Way S along Main Avenue S and Benson Road S to Benson Drive S. Where possible, narrow vehicle travel lanes to accommodate buffered bike lanes. Use delineators at corners and intersections. Limits Houser Way S to SE 168th Street (Start/End) Length 1.90 miles Destinations • Downtown (North to South) • City Hall • Renton Academy • Fred Nelsen Middle School Connections M • S 3rd Street Signed Shared Roadway (proposed (North to South) #58) • Lake to Sound Trail: East Segment (existing and proposed #27) • Powerline Trail (proposed #53) • Puget Drive Bike Lanes & Signed Shared Roadway (proposed #54) • Benson Neighborhood Greenway (proposed #5) • SE 168th Street Protected Bike Lanes (proposed #61) • Benson Drive S Shared Use Path (proposed #4) Cost $$$$ ($1.5M - $5M) Existing Cross- 1 lane in each direction; 2 lanes each direction Section Puget Drive S to S 27th Street Speed Limit 35 MPH Considerations Narrowing travel lanes and/or the center turn lane along Benson Road S appears possible, which will both slow traffic and provide space for a buffer. With Benson Drive S remaining a high volume/speed parallel route, Benson Road S should be a slower speed route providing local access and bicycle accom- modation. One of only 3 to 4 possible routes crossing 1-405 and connecting to the City Center. Consider lowering speed limit to 25 MPH. Location Map Facility IN Bike Lane Alternate Facility m `v D m Buffered Bike Lane t0 r 7) Cascade Waterline Spur Trail Project Description Develop a paved or soft -surface shared use path along the Cascade Waterline corridor between Puget Drive SE and the Seattle Water Pipeline. Path extends through powerline ROW and road ROW (SE 160th Street). Limits Puget Drive SE to SPU Water Pipeline Corridor (Start/End) Length 1.47 miles Destinations Cascade Elementary School (West to East) Cascade Park Connections M Grant Avenue Neighborhood Greenway (West to East) (proposed #15) • Puget Drive SE Bike Lanes (proposed #54) • 1 16th Avenue SE Bike Lanes (proposed #1) • Tiffany Park Neighborhood Greenway (proposed #77) • Seattle Waterline Trail (proposed #65) Cost $$$$ ($1.5M - $5M) Existing Cross- 30-foot wide utility corridor Section M Speed Limit N/A Considerations Requires coordination with utilities to establish agreement for non -motorized easement and facility. Location Map Facility Alternate Facility Shared Use Path Soft Surface Trail 8) Cedar to Sammamish Trail Project Description Develop a shared use path between 1 64th Avenue SE and Coalfield Park to Maple Valley Highway (SR 169) along SE 1 28th Street, 152nd Avenue SE, SE 142nd Street, 154th Avenue SE, and 154th Place SE. Limits 164th Avenue SE to Maple Valley Highway (SR (Start/End) 169) Length 2.68 miles (0.79 within Renton City Limits) Destinations • Coalfield Park (North to South) I • Maplewood Park • Ron Regis Park • Cedar River Trail Connections • NE 4th Street Bike Lanes (existing and proposed (North to South) 1 #43) • 156th Avenue SE Bike Lanes (proposed #3) • Maplewood Heights Neighborhood Greenway (proposed #32) • Jericho Avenue NE Bike Lanes (proposed #23) Cost King County is the lead agency Existing Cross- 1 lane in each direction 154th Avenue SE to Maple Section Valley Highway (SR 169) Speed Limit 25 and 35 MPH Considerations Connects to Cedar River Trail to East Plateau area. King County is lead agency. Location Map Facility Shared Use Path Alternate Facility m Z v n m Soft Surface Trail t0 IM) 9) Duvall Avenue NE Bike Lanes Project Description Complete gaps in bike lanes between NE Sunset Boulevard and NE 7th Place and NE 4th Street and NE 2nd Street. Limits SE May Valley Road (City Limits) to NE 2nd Street (Start/End) Length 0.94 miles Destinations • City of Newcastle (North to South) • May Valley and May Creek Trail • May Creek Park (McAskill) • Hazen High School Connections • May Valley Trail (proposed #35) (North to South) • Glencoe Neighborhood Greenway (proposed M #14) • NE Sunset Boulevard Bike Lanes (proposed #46) • North Highlands Neighborhood Greenway (proposed #48) • South Highlands Neighborhood Greenway (proposed #68) • NE 4th Street Bike Lanes (proposed #43) • Maplewood Heights Neighborhood Greenway (proposed #32) Cost $$$ ($500,000 - $1.5 M) Existing Cross- 2 lanes in each direction, center turn lane Section M Speed Limit 35 MPH Considerations Where possible, narrow vehicle travel lanes to ac- commodate buffered bike lanes. Use delineators at corners and intersections. Location Map Facility Alternate Facility m Z Bike Lane Buffered Bike Lane IRJ Ems. 10) East Valley Road Shared Use Path Project Description Construct a shared use path on the west side of East Valley Road from SW 16th Street to SW 43rd Street. Limits (Start/End) Length Destinations (North to South) Connections (North to South) Cost Existing Cross - Section Speed Limit Considerations SW 1 6th Street to SW 43rd Street 1.78 miles • Valley commercial area • SW 1 6th Street Shared Use Path (proposed I#72) • SW 27th Street Connector (proposed #73) • SE Petrovitsky Road Shared Use Path (proposed #63) $$$$$ (Over $5M) 1 lane in each direction, center turn lane 1 35 MPH Portions of this route must be shared sidewalk due to existing mature trees. Location Map Facility m Z v a oP° Shared Use Path tO IRJ Eol. 1 1) Eastside Rail Corridor Project Description Coordinate with King County Parks and BNSF on alignment and design of the Eastside Rail Corridor Trail between milepost 5 and Coulon Beach Park south entrance. Limits Milepost 5 (near Burnett Avenue N) to Lake (Start/End) Washington Blvd intersection) and Coulon Beach Park south entrance Length 16.70 miles (2.86 within Renton City Limits) Destinations I • Seahawks Training Facility (North to South) • Kennydale Beach Park • Kennydale Neighborhood • Gene Coulon Memorial Beach Park • The Landing I Connections Lake Washington Loop Trail (existing and (North to South) proposed #28) • Houser Way N Shared Use Path (proposed #22) • Logan Avenue N Shared Use Path (existing and proposed #31) • Logan Ave N Bike Lanes (existing) • North Southport Drive Shared Use Path (proposed #49) Cost King County is the lead agency. Existing Cross- 100-foot wide railroad corridor Section Speed Limit N/A Considerations King County is the lead agency. Location Map Facility Shared Use Path 12) Edmonds Avenue Connector Project Description Develop signed shared roadway on N 30th St from Park Ave N to 1-405. Transition to bike lanes on Kennewick PI NE/NE 27th St and continue southward on Edmonds Avenue NE to NE 3rd Street. M Limits Park Avenue N to NE 3rd Street (Start/End) Length 2.87 miles Destinations • Kennydale Neighborhood (North to South) • Kennydale Elementary School • Kennydale Lions Park • Honey Creek Trailhead • John McKnight Junior High School • Highlands Park and Neighborhood Center • Windsor Hills Park Connections Kennydale Neighborhood Greenway (proposed #24) (North to South) M • Pacific Railroad Trailhead (proposed #51 ) • Hillcrest Neighborhood Greenway (proposed #19) • NE 1 2th Street Bike Lanes (proposed #44) • North Southport Drive Shared Use Path (proposed #49) • South Highlands Neighborhood Greenway (proposed # 68) • Highlands Hillclimb (proposed #18) • Kennydale Signed Shared Roadway (proposed #25) Cost $$$ ($500,000 - $1.5 M) Existing Cross- 1 lane in each direction Section Speed Limit 30 MPH Considerations Additional study needed for NE 30th St where facility crosses at 1-405. Use delineators at corners and intersections. Parking capacity likely to be reduced when bike lanes implemented. Neighborhood sensitivity exists about retaining on -street parking. Location Map Facility Bike Lane Alternate Facility m Z o ° n of o � o m Signed Shared Roadway Two -Way Protected Bike Lc6 i 13) Garden Avenue N Shared Use Path Project Description Construct a shared use path on east side of Garden Avenue N from N 4th Street to Bronson Way N. Limits (Start/End) Length Destinations (North to South) Connections (North to South) Cost Existing Cross - Section Speed Limit Considerations N 4th Street to Bronson Way N 0.33 miles • The Landing • PACCAR • Liberty Park • Garden Avenue N Shared Use Path (existing) • N 4th Street Connector (proposed #38) $$$$ ($1.5M - $5M) 1 lane in each direction 25 MPH Bronson Way N connection will be challenging. Location Map Facility Shared Use Path 14) Glencoe Neighborhood Greenway Project Description Develop a neighborhood greenway from 1 26th Avenue SE to Nile Avenue SE (City Limits) via NE 19th Street, Anacortes Avenue NE, NE 24th Street, and NE 25th Street. Limits 1 26th Avenue NE to 148th Avenue SE/Nile Avenue (Start/End) SE (City Limits) Length 1.61 miles Destinations • Glencoe Park (West to East) • May Creek Park (McAskill) Connections • Honey Creek Extensions (proposed #20) (West to East) • Union Avenue Bike Lanes (proposed #79) • Duvall Avenue Bike Lanes (proposed #9) • Nile Avenue SE Bike Lanes (proposed #47) M Cost Existing Cross - Section Speed Limit Considerations $$$ ($500,000 - $1.5 M) 1 lane in each direction 25 MPH Location Map Facility Neighborhood Greenway Q m z 0 n m (0 ��1 j 15) Grant Avenue Neighborhood Greenway Project Description Develop a neighborhood greenway along Renton Avenue S and Grant Avenue S from I-405 to S Puget Drive. Limits Mill Avenue S to S Puget Drive (Start/End) Length 1.46 miles Destinations • Downtown (North to South) • Cedar River Trail M Connections • Lake to Sound Trail: East Segment (proposed (North to South) #27) • Seattle Waterline Trail (proposed #65) • Puget Drive SE Bike Lanes (proposed #54) • Cascade Waterline Spur Trail (proposed #7) Cost $$$ ($500,000 - $1.5 M) Existing Cross- 1 lane in each direction Section Speed Limit 25 MPH Considerations Requires easement for powerline property crossing and gate modification to allow pedestrian and bicycle access. Consider a two-way protected bike lane on the east side of Grant Avenue from the power line corridor to S Puget Drive, which would require consolidation of on -street parking on the west side of Grant Avenue. Parking on Grant Avenue appears to be under-utilized, but should be studied. Location Map Facility Neighborhood Greenway Alternate Facility m Z v Two -Way Protected Bike Lane m 16) Hardie Avenue Bike Lane & Shared Use Path Project Description Install bike lanes from SW Sunset Boulevard (SR 900) to SW 5th Place and a shared use path on the west side of Hardie Avenue between SW 5th Place and Rainier Avenue S. Limits SW Sunset Boulevard to Rainier Avenue S (SR 167) (Start/End) Length 0.55 miles Destinations • Fred Meyer Shopping Plaza (North to South) • Proposed Transit Hub M Connections • Hardie Avenue Shared Roadway (existing) (North to South) • Lake to Sound Trail: East Segment (existing and proposed #27) Cost $$$ ($500,000 - $1.5 M) Existing Cross- North of SW 5th Place: 1 lane in each direction Section South of SW 5th Place: 1 lane in each direction and a center turn lane Speed Limit 25 MPH Considerations Coordinate with Sound Transit on connection between SW 7th Street and the proposed transit center. Location Map Facility Z4 k NEW -- Bike Lane r "I 17) Harrington Avenue NE Neighborhood Greenway Project Description Route on Harrington Avenue NE that connects Meadow Crest Early Learning Center and Meadow Crest Accessible Playground, McKnight Middle School, Sunset Neighborhood Park, and Highlands Elementary School. Limits Harrington Circle NE to NE 7th St (Start/End) Length 1.39 miles Destinations • Meadow Crest Early Learning Center (North to South) • Meadow Crest Accessible Playground • McKnight Middle School • Sunset Neighborhood Park • Highlands Elementary School Connections • NE 1 2th Street Bike Lanes (proposed #44) (North to South) • NE 16th Street Signed Shared Roadway M (proposed #45) • NE Sunset Blvd Shared Use Path (proposed #46) • Hillcrest Neighborhood Greenway (proposed #19) • South Highlands Neighborhood Greenway (proposed #68) Cost $$$ ($500,000 - $1.5 M) Existing Cross- 1 lane in each direction Section Speed Limit 25 MPH Considerations Routing around Sunset Neighborhood Park, no direct routing through park. Route to cross NE Sunset Blvd Location Map Facility Neighborhood Greenway 18) Highlands Hillclimb Project Description Establish a route from Sunset Boulevard NE to the intersection of NE 3rd and 4th Streets, comprising a shared roadway on Bronson Way NE and bike lanes on NE 4th Street (Uphill bike lane/downhill shared lane marking west of Edmonds Avenue NE and bike lanes both sides east of Edmonds Avenue NE.) Limits (Start/End) Length Destinations (West to East) Connections (West to East) Cost Existing Cross - Section Speed Limit Sunset Boulevard NE to Jefferson Avenue NE 1.31 miles • North Renton • Renton Technical College • Sunset Boulevard Hillclimb (proposed #71) • Edmonds Avenue Connector (proposed #12) • NE 3rd Street Shared Use Path (proposed #42) • Hillcrest Neighborhood Greenway (proposed #19) $$ ($100,000 - $500,000) 1 lane in each direction N 25 MPH Considerations Study the feasibility of traffic calming measures, such as traffic circles at the Edmonds Avenue inter- section and the intersection of Bronson Way NE, Windsor Way NE and Grandey Way NE. Location Map Facility � d Bike Lane Q a Signed Shared Roadway Alternate Facility m Z v a n C - y m Two -Way Protected Bike L* 19) Hillcrest Neighborhood Greenway Project Description Develop a neighborhood greenway on NE 24th St from Jones Ave NE that connects to Kennydale Lions Park then crosses Edmonds Ave NE to connect to Meadow Crest Early Learning Center. The route would follow Kirkland Ave NE from NE 16th St southward to NE 4th St behind Renton Technical College. Limits Jones Avenue NE to NE 4th Street (Start/End) Length 2.72 miles Destinations • Kennydale Lions Park (North to South) • Meadow Crest Early Learning Center • Meadow Crest Accessible Playground • Renton Technical College Connections • Kennydale Neighborhood Greenway (proposed #24) (North to South) • Edmonds Avenue Connector (proposed #1 2) • Harrington Avenue NE Neighborhood Greenway (proposed #17) • NE 16th Street Signed Shared Roadway (proposed #45) • NE 1 2th Street Bike Lanes (proposed #44) • NE Sunset Boulevard Shared Use Path (proposed #46) • North Highlands Neighborhood Greenway (proposed #48) M • South Highlands Neighborhood Greenway (proposed #68) • Highlands Hillclimb (proposed #18) Cost $$$ ($500,000 - $1.5 M) Existing Cross- 1 lane in each direction Section Speed Limit 25 MPH Considerations Consider a 2-way protected bike lane on the east side of Kirkland Ave from Sunset Blvd to NE 4th Street. Crossing NE Sunset Blvd/1-900 will need more study. Location Map Facility Neighborhood Greenway Alternate Facility m Z a n Two -Way Protected Bike Lane (00 20) Honey Creek Trail Extensions Project Description Develop a soft surface trail along the east side of Honey Creek that connects the proposed May Creek Trail to existing Honey Creek Trail. On south end of the Honey Creek Trail, construct new trailhead on city -owned property and develop a soft surface trail that connects to NE 19th Street and NE Sunset Boulevard. Limits Proposed May Creek Trail to Honey Creek Trail (Start/End) M Length 1.17 miles Destinations Honey Creek Greenway (North to South) M Connections • Pacific Railroad Trailhead (proposed #51) (North to South) • May Creek Trail (existing and proposed #34) • Edmonds Avenue Connector (proposed #12 • Glencoe Neighborhood Greenway (proposed #14) • Honey Creek Trail • NE 16th Street Signed Shared Roadway (proposed #45) • NE Sunset Boulevard Shared Use Path (proposed #46) Cost M $$ ($100,000 - $500,000) Existing Cross- N/A Section Speed Limit N/A Considerations Property acquisitions or easements may be required to connect the May Creek Trail as well as a bridge over Honey Creek to connect trailhead at NE 21 st Street to NE 16th Street access. Connection to NE 19th Street requires property acquisition or easements. Connection to NE Sunset Boulevard is steep and constrained, but possible, and may require a small bridge across Honey Creek. Location Map Facility Soft Surface Trail 21) Houser Way and Factory Avenue Project Description Provide protected bike lanes along Houser Way from Mill Avenue to Bronson Way N. Develop a signed, shared roadway on Factory Ave N from Bronson Way N to N 4th Street. Limits N 4th Street to Mill Avenue S (Start/End) Length 0.68 miles Destinations • Liberty Park (North to South) • Cedar River Park • Cedar River Trail • Renton Library • Downtown Connections N 4th Street Connector (proposed #38) (North to South) NE 3rd Street Shared Use Path (proposed #42) • Lake to Sound Trail: East Segment (existing and proposed #27) • Grant Avenue Neighborhood Greenway (proposed #15) Cost $$$$ ($1.5M - $5M) Existing Cross- Factory Avenue: 1 lane in each direction Section Houser Way N: 3-4 lanes northbound Speed Limit 25 MPH Considerations Requires new or retrofitted bridge over the Cedar River (not included in cost estimate). Location Map Facility o v ° Q Signed Shared Roadway 22) Houser Way N Shared Use Path Project Description Develop a shared use path along the east side of Houser Way N from the Lake Washington Boulevard N to the existing Shared Use Path on N 8th Street. Develop shared use path on the west side of Houser Way Bypass from N 8th St to Sunset Blvd N by converting existing walkway. Coordinate with King County for Eastside Rail Corridor. Limits Lake Washington Boulevard N to N 4th Street (Start/End) Length 1.10 miles Destinations • Gene Coulon Memorial Beach Park (North to South) • The Landing Connections M • Eastside Rail Corridor (existing and proposed (North to South) #1 1 ) • Lake Washington Loop Trail (existing and proposed #29) M • North Southport Drive Shared Use Path (proposed #49) • N 8th Street Shared Use Path (proposed #40) Cost $$$$$ (Over $5M) Existing Cross- 1 lane in each direction Section M Speed Limit 25 MPH Considerations Study the feasibility of modifying existing parking on east side of Houser Way. Location Map Face►ty m Z v a oP° Shared Use Path tO r" 23) Jericho Avenue NE Bike Lanes Project Description Construct bike lanes south on Jericho Avenue NE from NE 4th Court to SE 142nd Street and then east on SE 142nd Street to 152nd Avenue. If sidewalks are missing, install shared use path. Serves Maplewood Heights Elementary School and future King County Maplewood Park. Limits NE 4th Court to SE 1 36th Street (Start/End) Length 1.45 miles (0.60 within Renton City Limits) Destinations • Maplewood Heights Elementary School (North to South) • Maplewood Community Park Connections • South Highlands Neighborhood Greenway (North to South) M (proposed #68) • NE 4th Street Bike Lanes (existing and proposed M #43) • Maplewood Heights Neighborhood Greenway (proposed #32) • Cedar to Sammamish Trail (proposed #8) Cost $$$ ($500,000 - $1.5 M) Existing Cross- 1 lane in each direction Section Speed Limit 30 MPH Considerations There is existing parking on east side within vicinity of Maplewood Heights Elementary School (NE 2nd Street to SE 2nd Place) that should remain. Requires a feasibility study for dropping a turn lane at the NE 4th Street intersection. Parking on the east side of 144th Avenue SE would need to be accommodated on the west side of the street. Location Map Facility Bike Lane Alternate Facility m Z a o�° Shared Use Path tp W1 24) Kennydale Neighborhood Greenway Project Description Develop a neighborhood greenway from Lake Washington Boulevard to Sunset Boulevard along N 40th Street, Park Avenue N, Jones Avenue NE, N 28th Street, NE 20th Street, Monterey Avenue NE, NE 1 2th Street and Aberdeen Avenue NE. Limits Lake Washington Boulevard N to Sunset Boulevard (Start/End) NE Length 2.58 miles Destinations • Kennydale Elementary School (North to South) I Connections • Lake Washington Loop Trail (existing and (North to South) I proposed #29) • Eastside Rail Corridor (proposed #1 1) • Edmonds Avenue Connector (proposed #1 2) • Hillcrest Neighborhood Greenway (proposed #19) • NE 1 2th Street Bike Lanes (proposed #44) • Sunset Boulevard Hillclimb (proposed #71) • South Highlands Neighborhood Greenway (proposed #68) I Cost $$$ ($500,000 - $1.5 M) Existing Cross- 1 lane in each direction Section I Speed Limit 25 MPH Considerations Connection west to east across 1-405 via Edmonds Avenue Connector (proposed #1 2) Location Map Facility m Z a v m Neighborhood Greenway t0 r 25) Kennydale Signed Shared Roadway Project Description Create a signed shared roadway along Burnett Avenue N from the intersection of Lake Washington Boulevard N and N 36th Street to the intersection of Lake Washington Boulevard N and Burnett Avenue N. Create an additional path along N 30th St from Burnett Avenue N to Park Avenue N . Limits Lake Washington Boulevard N to Park Avenue N (Start/End) Length 0.80 miles Destinations • Kennydale Beach Park (North to South) • Gene Coulon Memorial Beach Park Connections • Lake Washington Boulevard N Bike Lanes (North to South) • Lake Washington Loop Trail (existing and proposed #29) • Eastside Rail Corridor (proposed #1 1) • Edmonds Avenue Connector (proposed #12) • Kennydale Neighborhood Greenway (proposed #24) Cost $$ ($100,000 - $500,000) Existing Cross- 1 lane in each direction Section Speed Limit Considerations 25 MPH Location Map Facility m Z a � m Signed Shared Roadway tp ��1 j 26) Kenyon -Dobson Trail and Trailhead Project Description Develop a trailhead for Kenyon -Dobson Park and a trail connection to May Creek Trail in the City of Newcastle. Limits Kenyon -Dobson Park and the proposed City of (Start/End) Newcastle trail system Length 0.53 miles (0.24 within Renton City Limits) Destinations • City of Newcastle trail system (West to East) • Kenyon -Dobson Park • May Creek Trail Connections (West to East) Cost Existing Cross - Section Speed Limit Considerations • May Creek Hillclimb (proposed #33) $$ ($100,000 - $500,000) N/A I N/A Requires coordination with Newcastle and King County. Location Map Facility Soft Surface Trail r "I 27) Lake to Sound Trail: East Segment Project Description Develop a two-way protected bike lane along the north or south side of Houser Way between Burnett Avenue S and Mill Avenue S. Requires removal of parking on one side of Houser Way. Develop a shared roadway along the Cedar River Trail access road between Mill Avenue S and the Cedar River Trail trailhead. Limits Burnett Avenue S to the Cedar River Trailhead (Start/End) Length 0.45 miles Destinations • Renton Library (West to East) • Cedar River Trail • Narco Property • Cedar River Trail Connections • Lake to Sound Trail: West Segment (existing and (West to East) proposed #28) • Wells Avenue Signed Shared Roadway (proposed #79) • Renton Connector (proposed #54) • S 3rd Street Signed Shared Roadway (proposed #57) • Benson Road S/Main Avenue S Bike Lanes (proposed #6) • Mill Avenue S Signed Shared Roadway (proposed #36) • Houser Way & Factory Avenue (proposed #21) • Grant Avenue Neighborhood Greenway (proposed #15) Cost $$ ($100,000 - $500,000) Existing Cross- • Houser Way S: 1 lane in southbound direction Section • Cedar River Access Rd: 1 lane in each direction Speed Limit 25 MPH Considerations This segment is constrained where the Cedar River Trail access road abuts the 1-405 retaining wall with minimal clearance between the road and the BNSF RR tracks. Location Map Facility i b 7,71 VI OF; :rr Two -Way Protected Bike Lane a a Signed Shared Roadway 28) Lake to Sound Trail: West Segment Project Description Coordinate with King County and BNSF to develop a regional shared use path along the railroad right of way between Naches Avenue SW and Burnett Avenue S. Limits Eastern terminus of planned Lake to Sound Trail and (Start/End) Burnett Avenue S Length 2.26 miles (2.21 within Renton City Limits) Destinations • Green River Trail (West to East) M • Fort Dent Park • Black River Riparian Forest • Proposed Transit Hub • Downtown Connections Shattuck to Airport Connector (proposed #66) (West to East) Renton Connector (proposed #55) • Lake to Sound Trail: East Segment (existing and proposed #27) Cost $$$$$ (Over $5M) Existing Cross- 100-foot railroad right of way Section M Speed Limit N/A Considerations Alternate: Between Shattuck Avenue S and Burnett Avenue S, in lieu of a shared use path within the BNSF ROW, develop a shared roadway regional trail facility along Houser Way. Requires access study for parcels fronting Houser Way. Location Map Facility Shared Use Path Alternate Facility m Z a n m Signed Shared Roadway tO �10 LI 29) Lake Washington Loop Trail Project Description Provide a shared use path to connect the west side of Rainier Avenue N to the existing shared use path on the west side of Logan Avenue N along Airport Way. Coordinate with existing protected bike lanes on Airport Way and the Renton Airport Master Plan. Limits City Limits at Airport access road to Logan Avenue (Start/End) N Bridge Length 1.65 miles (1.34 within Renton City Limits) Destinations (North to South) Connections • Lake Washington Loop Trail (existing) (North to South) • Shattuck to Airport Connector (proposed #66) • Renton Connector (proposed #55) • Logan Avenue Shares Use Path (existing and proposed #31) • Cedar River Trail M Cost $$$$$ (Over $5M) Existing Cross- 2 lanes in each direction with a center turn lane Section Speed Limit Considerations N 35 MPH Location Map Facility r ��.. A �= N Shared Use Path Alternate Facility m Z ov° m Two -Way Protected Bike Lane (00 m1 1, 30) Langston Road/SW 134th Street Hillclimb Project Description South of S 1 32nd Street establish a signed shared roadway along S Langston Road, S 1 34th Street, and Stevens Avenue SW. Create bike lanes along SW Langston Road between Stevens Avenue SW and Hardie Avenue SW. Limits S 132nd Street to Hardie Avenue SW (Start/End) Length 0.79 miles Destinations • Renton Secondary Learning Center (West to East) • Eadington Park Connections • Hardie Avenue SW Signed Shared Roadway (West to East) (existing) • Hardie Avenue Bike Lane & Shared Use Path (proposed #16) Cost $ (Under $100,000) Existing Cross- 1 lane in each direction Section M Speed Limit 25 MPH Considerations On SW Langston Road, consider an uphill bike lane on the north side of the street and a downhill shared lane on the south side of the street. To accommo- date the bike lane, parking could be consolidated on the south side of the street. Location Map Facility Bike Lane Signed Shared Roadway 31) Logan Avenue N Shared Use Path Project Description Develop a shared use path on the west side of Logan Avenue N from N 6th Street to Garden Avenue N. Limits Garden Avenue N to N 6th Street (Start/End) Length 0.76 miles Destinations Coulon Memorial Beach Park (North to South) Southport • The Landing M Connections Houser Way N Shared Use Path (proposed #22) (North to South) Eastside Rail Corridor (proposed #1 1) • Lake Washington Boulevard N Bike Lanes • North Southport Drive Shared Use Path M (proposed #49) • N 8th Street Shared Use Path (proposed #40) • N 6th Street Bike Lanes (proposed #39) • Logan Avenue Shared Use Trail (existing) • Lake Washington Loop Trail (existing and proposed #29) M Cost $$$$$ (Over $5M) Existing Cross- 1-2 lanes southbound and 1 lane north bound with Section a center turn lane M Speed Limit 35 MPH Considerations Requires coordination and easements with Boeing. Location Map Face►ty m z v a oP° Shared Use Path tO r" 32) Maplewood Heights Neighborhood Greenway Project Description Develop a neighborhood greenway along NE 2nd Street from Union Avenue NE to 156th Avenue SE (City Limits). Limits Union Avenue NE and 156th Avenue SE (Start/End) Length 1.64 miles (1.51 within Renton City Limits) Destinations • Heritage Park (West to East) • Maplewood Heights Elementary School Connections • Union Avenue NE Bike Lanes (proposed #79) (West to East) • Duvall Avenue NE Bike Lanes (proposed #9) • Jericho Ave NE Bike Lanes (proposed #23) • Cedar to Sammamish Trail (proposed #8) • 156th Avenue SE Bike Lanes (proposed (#3) Cost $$$ ($500,000 - $1.5 M) Existing Cross- 1 lane in each direction Section N Speed Limit 25 MPH Considerations Location Map Facility m ;ONI Neighborhood Greenway tp �?1 j 33) May Creek Hillclimb Project Description Create a signed shared roadway on NE 44th Street, Lincoln Avenue NE and Monterey Place NE. Limits Lake Washington Boulevard N to SE 86th Place (Start/End) (City Limits) Length Destinations (North to South) 0.78 miles • Kenyon -Dobson Park Connections • Lake Washington Boulevard N Bike Lanes (North to South) • Lake Washington Loop Trail (existing and M proposed #29) Eastside Rail Corridor (planned #1 1) City of Newcastle proposed 11 2th Avenue Trail Cost $$ ($100,000 - $500,000) Existing Cross- 1 lane in each direction Section M Speed Limit 25 MPH Considerations Consider constructing an uphill climbing lane. Coordinate with WSDOT for interchange design. Location Map Facility Signed Shared Roadway Alternate Facility m Z Shared Lane DownlBike Lane Up TV j 34) May Creek Trail Project Description Extend the May Creek Trail from the existing trail west of 1-405, under 1-405, and connect to the City of Newcastle's May Creek Trail. Limits May Creek Trail at 1-405 to May Creek Trail at the (Start/End) City of Newcastle City Limits Length 1.58 miles (1.50 within Renton City Limits) Destinations • May Creek Greenway (North to South) Connections • May Creek Trail at 1-405 (North to South) • Pacific Railroad Trailhead and Trail (proposed #51) • Honey Creek Trail Extensions (proposed #20) • May Creek Trail at the City of Newcastle City Limits M Cost Existing Cross - Section N $$ ($100,000 - $500,000) N/A Speed Limit N/A Considerations Interagency coordination with King County and City of Newcastle. Requires bridge at May Creek crossing and property acquisition and/or WSDOT easements. WSDOT will be making the trail con- nection under 1-405 in 2024. Location Map Facility Soft Surface Trail Q n, m Boardwalk tp �?1 j 35) May Valley Trail Project Description Develop a soft surface trail between Duvall Avenue NE and NE 26th Street through May Creek Park and the Langley Ridge easement. Limits Duvall Avenue NE to NE 26th Street (Start/End) Length 0.49 miles Destinations • Honey Creek Neighborhood Greenway (West to East) Connections • Duvall Ave NE Bike Lanes (existing and proposed (West to East) #9) • May Creek/McAskill Park • Glencoe Neighborhood Greenway (proposed M #13) Cost TBD Existing Cross- N/A Section M Speed Limit N/A Considerations Possible easements required. Location Map Facility Soft Surface Trail �?1 j 36) Mill Avenue S Signed Shared Roadway Project Description Create a shared roadway on Mill Avenue S from Bronson Way N to Houser Way, extending along Bronson Way N bridge. This facility connects the N 2nd Street two-way protected bike lane with the Lake to Sound Trail and Cedar River Trail. Limits Houser Way S to Park Avenue N (Start/End) Length 0.19 miles Destinations • Liberty Park (North to South) • Renton Library M Connections Cedar River Trail (North to South) S 2nd Street Protected Bike Lanes (proposed #57) • Lake to Sound Trail: East Segment (proposed #27) • Houser Way and Factory Avenue (proposed #21) Cost $ (Under $100,000) Existing Cross- 1 lane in south direction and 2 lanes in north Section direction Speed Limit 25 MPH Considerations While a shared roadway is feasible on Mill Avenue, the transition to Bronson Way at the north end is problematic due to the higher traffic volumes and number of lanes. Most cyclists will not be confident turning onto or off of Bronson Way. The feasibility of a two-way protected bike lane on the east side of Mill Avenue and Bronson Way (across the bridge) should be studied. Location Map Facility Signed Shared Roadway r •I 37) Monroe Avenue NE Bike Lanes Project Description Develop bike lanes on Monroe Ave NE from NE 1 2th Street to NE 4th Street. Partner with Renton Technical College to establish a pedestrian and bicycle entry at the corner of NE 7th Street and Monroe Ave NE. Limits NE 1 2th Street to NE 4th Street (Start/End) Length 1.00 miles Destinations • Renton Technical College (North to South) Connections • NE 1 2th Street Bike Lanes (proposed #44) (North to South) • North Highlands Neighborhood Greenway (proposed #48) • South Highlands Neighborhood Greenway (proposed #68) • NE 4th Street Bike Lanes (existing and proposed M #43) Cost $$ ($100,000 - $500,000) Existing Cross- 1 lane in each direction, parking both sides Section M Speed Limit 30 MPH & 35 MPH Considerations A connection/entry to parking lot of Renton Technical College is needed at Monroe and NE 7th St. Location Map Facility Alternate Facility m Z m Bike Lane Two -Way Protected Bike Lane t0 r" 38) N 4th Street Connector Project Description Construct a two-way protected bike lane on the north side of N 4th Street between Logan Avenue N and Houser Way N. Limits Logan Avenue N to Houser Way N (Start/End) Length 0.60 miles Destinations • Renton Memorial Stadium (West to East) • Sartori Elementary Connections • Logan Avenue Trail Shared Use Path (existing and (West to East) proposed #31 ) • Garden Avenue N Shared Use Path (existing and proposed #13) • Houser Way and Factory Avenue (proposed #21) Cost $$$ ($500,000 - $1.5 M) Existing Cross- 4 lanes westbound one-way Section M Speed Limit 30 MPH Considerations Requires dropping the northernmost of four vehicle travel lanes on N 4th Street. Location Map Face►ty m z v v n Two -Way Protected Bike Lane 39) N 6th Street Bike Lanes Project Description Establish bike lanes along N bth Street from Cedar River Trail Park to Garden Avenue N. Limits Cedar River Trail Park to Garden Avenue N (Start/End) Length 0.57 miles Destinations • Cedar River Trail Park (West to East) • Cedar River Trail Connections • Logan Avenue Trail Shared Use Path (existing (West to East) M and proposed #31) • Garden Avenue N Shared Use Path (existing and proposed #13) Cost $$$ ($500,000 - $1.5 M) Existing Cross- 1 lane in each direction west of Logan Avenue N Section 2 lanes in each direction east of Logan Avenue N Speed Limit 25 MPH Considerations May require additional right of way. Location Map Facility m z Bike Lane 010 L 40) N 8th Street Shared Use Path Project Description Convert existing sidewalk on the south side to a shared use path on N 8th Street from Logan Avenue N to Garden Avenue N. Limits Logan Avenue N and Garden Avenue N (Start/End) Length 0.31 miles Destinations Boeing Plant (West to East) The Landing M Connections • Logan Avenue Trail Shared Use Path (existing (West to East) M and proposed #31) • Garden Avenue N Shared Use Path (existing and M proposed #13) Cost $$$ ($500,000 - $1.5 M) Existing Cross- 2 lanes in each direction with a center turn lane Section Speed Limit 25 MPH Considerations May require additional right of way. Location Map Facility Shared Use Path 41) Naches Avenue Shared Use Path Project Description Construct a shared use path along the west side of Naches Avenue SW from the end of the Lake to Sound Trail to Oakesdale Avenue SW (via SW 7th St). Convert existing sidewalk to a shared use path. Limits North end of Naches Avenue SW to Oakesdale (Start/End) Avenue SW Length 0.34 miles Destinations Black River Riparian Forest (North to South) M Connections • Lake to Sound Trail: West Segment (existing and (North to South) proposed #28) • Black River Trail M Cost $$$ ($500,000 - $1.5 M) Existing Cross- Naches Avenue SW: 1 lane in each direction, Section parking on both sides SW 7th Street: 2 lanes with a center turn lane Speed Limit 25 MPH on Naches Avenue SW 30 MPH on SW 7th Street Considerations Some portions of this alignment are constrained and default to sidewalks. Location Map Facility Shared Use Path 42) NE 3rd Street Project Description Establish a signed shared roadway on N Brooks Street and Houser Way N between Factory Avenue N and N 3rd Street. Construct a shared use path on uphill direction and a bike lane for downhill direction on NE 3rd Street from Sunset Boulevard N to Monroe Avenue NE. Limits Factory Avenue N and Monroe Avenue NE (Start/End) Length 0.98 miles Destinations (West to East) Connections Houser Way & Factory Avenue (proposed #21) (West to East) Edmonds Avenue Connector (proposed #1 2) • Hillcrest Neighborhood Greenway (proposed #19) • Monroe Avenue NE Bike Lanes (proposed #37) • NE 4th Street Bike Lanes (existing and proposed #43) Cost $$$$ ($1.5M - $5M) Existing Cross- 2 lanes in each direction with a center turn lane in Section places M Speed Limit 35 MPH Considerations Portions of this alignment are constrained. The section at Sunset Boulevard and 1-405 will be limited to the existing sidewalk, and the portion immediately east of 1-405 has steep banks on both sides, which may make construction of a Shared Use Path prohibitive. Travel lanes are 1 2-feet wide and could be narrowed to 1 1-feet wide to gain space. Consistent with NE 3rd/4th Corridor Study (2005). Location Map Facility Shared Use Path m Signed Shared Roadway,, i 43) NE 4th Street Bike Lanes Project Description Complete bike lanes on NE 4th Street between Monroe Avenue NE and 156th Avenue SE. Limits Monroe Avenue NE to 156th Avenue SE (Start/End) Length 0.87 miles Destinations (West to East) Connections Monroe Avenue NE Bike Lanes (proposed #37) (West to East) Union Avenue NE Bike Lanes (proposed #78) M • Duvall Avenue NE Bike Lanes (proposed #9) • Jericho Ave NE (proposed #23) • Nile Avenue Shared Roadway (proposed #47) • Cedar to Sammamish Trail (proposed #8) • 156th Avenue Se Bike Lanes (proposed #3) Cost $$ ($100,000 - $500,000) Existing Cross- 2 lanes in each direction with a center turn lane Section M Speed Limit 35 MPH Considerations This project completes a gap in the existing bike lanes, but does not meet a Level of Traffic Stress 2 standard. Consistent with NE 3rd Street/NE 4th Street Corridor Study (2005) Location Map Face►ty m Z 1_ Bike Lane 44) NE 12th Street Bike Lanes Project Description Construct bike lanes along NE 1 2th Street between Edmonds Avenue NE and Union Ave NE. Limits Edmonds Avenue NE to Union Avenue NE (Start/End) Length 0.98 miles Destinations John McKnight Junior High School (West to East) Connections Kennydale Neighborhood Greenway (proposed (West to East) #24) • Edmonds Avenue Connector (proposed #1 2) • Harrington Avenue NE Neighborhood Greenway (proposed #17) • Hillcrest Neighborhood Greenway (proposed 19#) • NE Sunset Boulevard Shared Use Path (proposed #46) • Monroe Avenue Bike Lanes (proposed #37) • Union Avenue Bike Lanes (proposed #79) Cost $$ ($100,000 - $500,000) Existing Cross- 1 lane in each direction Section M Speed Limit 25 MPH Considerations Construct a two-way protected bike lane on the north side of NE 12 Street between Sunset Boulevard and Edmonds Avenue, which would require removal of on -street parking on the north side of NE 12 Street between Sunset Boulevard and Edmonds Avenue NE. Location Map Facility Alternate Facility m Z Jr v m � e m Bike Lane Two -Way Protected Bike Lane r "I 45) NE 16th Street Signed Shared Roadway Project Description Develop a shared roadway along NE 16th Street between Edmonds Avenue and the Honey Creek Trail trailhead. Limits Edmonds Avenue NE to Kirkland Avenue NE (Start/End) Length 0.42 miles Destinations • John McKnight Junior High School (West to East) • Meadow Crest Early Learning Center • Meadow Crest Accessible Playground • North Highlands Neighborhood Center M Connections • Edmonds Avenue Connector (proposed #12) (West to East) • Harrington Avenue NE Neighborhood Greenway (proposed #17) M • Hillcrest Neighborhood Greenway (proposed #19) • Honey Creek Trail Extensions (proposed #20) Cost $$ ($100,000 - $500,000) Existing Cross- 1 lane in each direction Section M Speed Limit 25 MPH Considerations The Honey Creek Trail trailhead is currently not accessible via public property, easements may be required. Location Map Facility Signed Shared Roadway �r - j 46) NE Sunset Boulevard Shared Use Path Project Description Create a shared us path along NE Sunset Blvd between Edmonds Ave NE and Duvall Ave NE. Limits Edmonds Ave NE and Duvall Ave NE (Start/End) Length 1.75 miles Destinations • Sunset Neighborhood Park (West to East) I • Highlands Library Connections • Edmonds Avenue Connector (proposed #1 2) (West to East) 1 • Harrington Avenue Neighborhood Greenway (proposed #17) • North Highlands Neighborhood Greenway 1 (Proposed #48) • Hillcrest Neighborhood Greenway (proposed 1 #19) • NE 1 2th Street Bike Lanes (proposed #44) • Honey Creek Trail Extensions (proposed #20) • Union Avenue NE Bike Lanes (proposed #79) • Duvall Ave NE Bike Lanes ( existing and proposed #9) Cost $$$$$ (Over $5M) Existing Cross- 2 lanes in each direction Section Speed Limit 35 MPH Considerations Location Map Facility ON NO r-27", rri I Shared Use Path Alternate Facility m aj-i O y Bike Lane tO 47) Nile Avenue NE Bike Lanes Project Description Construct bike lanes on 148th Avenue SE/Nile Avenue NE from SE May Valley Road to NE 4th Street. Coordinate with bridge replacement/ expansion. Limits SE May Valley Road to NE 4th Street (Start/End) Length 1.94 miles (1.17 within Renton City Limits) Destinations • May Valley Park (North to South) • Apollo Elementary School I Connections • SE May Valley Road Signed Shared Roadway (North to South) I • Glencoe Neighborhood Greenway (proposed #14) • North Highlands Neighborhood Greenway (proposed #48) • South Highlands Neighborhood Greenway (proposed #68) • NE 4th Street Bike Lanes (existing and proposed #43) Cost $$$$$ (Over $5M) Existing Cross- 1 lane in each direction Section I Speed Limit 35 MPH Considerations Location Map Facility m Z L y m Bike Lane r 48) North Highlands Neighborhood Greenway Project Description Develop a neighborhood greenway along NE 1 Oth Street from Sunset Neighborhood Park to Nile Avenue NE. Limits Sunset Neighborhood Park to Nile Avenue NE (City (Start/End) Limits) Length 1.85 miles Destinations • Sunset Neighborhood Park (West to East) I • Highlands Library • Kiwanis Park • Honey Dew Elementary School • Hazen High School I Connections Hillcrest Neighborhood Greenway (proposed (West to East) #19) Monroe Avenue Bike Lanes (proposed #37) • Union Avenue Bike Lanes (proposed #79) • Duvall Avenue Bike Lanes (proposed #9) • Nile Avenue Bike Lanes (proposed #47) Cost $$$ ($500,000 - $1.5M) Existing Cross- 1 lane in each direction Section I Speed Limit 25 MPH Considerations Location Map Facility m Z amp � � m Neighborhood Greenway t0 IM 49) North Southport Drive Shared Use Path Project Description Convert the existing paved shoulder along North Southport Dr into a shared use path and extend it from Garden Avenue N to Edmonds Avenue NE. Limits Garden Avenue N to Edmonds Avenue NE (Start/End) M Length 0.84 miles Destinations The Landing (West to East) Southport • Gene Coulon Memorial Beach Park Connections M Logan Avenue Trail Shared Use Path (existing (West to East) and proposed #31) • Eastside Rail Corridor (proposed #1 1) • Houser Way N Shared Use Path (proposed #22) M• Kennydale Neighborhood Greenway (proposed #24) • Sunset Boulevard Hillclimb (proposed #70) • Edmonds Avenue Connector (proposed #12) • NE Sunset Boulevard Shared Use Path (proposed #46) Cost M $$$$ ($1.5M - $5M) Existing Cross- 2 lanes in each direction Section M Speed Limit 35 MPH Considerations WSDOT jurisdiction (SR 900). This route limited to sidewalk near to 1-405. Location Map Facility m Z a n P' p ep o � e m ,Q Shared Use Path tO 50) Oakesdale Avenue Bike Lanes Project Description Limits (Start/End) Length Destinations (North to South) Connections (North to South) Cost Existing Cross - Section Speed Limit Considerations Complete bike lanes on Oakesdale Avenue SW from SW 27th Street and S 180th Street (City Limits). SW 27th Street to S 1 80th Street (City Limits) M 1.00 miles • Renton Wetlands • SW 27th Street Connector (proposed #70) • Springbrook Trail $$$$$ (Over $5M) 2 lanes in each direction with a center turn lane 35 MPH This project extends the existing bike lanes, but may not meet an Level of Traffic Stress 2 standard. Location Map Facility m Z Bike Lane (00 51) Pacific Railroad Trailhead & Trail Project Description Construct a trailhead and trail from the end of NE 29th Street to the proposed May Creek Trail. Limits East end of NE 29th Street to the proposed May (Start/End) Creek Trail Length 0.30 miles Destinations • Kennydale Elementary School (West to East) Connections • Edmonds Ave Connector (proposed #1 2) (West to East) • May Creek Trail (proposed #34) Cost $ (Under $100,000) Existing Cross- N/A Section M Speed Limit N/A Considerations Property ownership has not been identified and will likely require going through reversionary rights process. Coordinate with King County. Trailhead parking may be limited to on -street parking along NE 29th Street and NE 29th Court. Location Map Facility Soft Surface Trail TV j 52) Panther Creek Trail Project Description Develop a boardwalk along the Panther Creek wetlands connecting to Lake Avenue S at the north end and S 192nd Street (via Auburn Easement) at the south end. Limits Lake Avenue S and S 15th Street intersection to S (Start/End) 192nd Street and Edlund Farm Length 3.52 miles Destinations • Panther Creek Wetlands (North to south) • Edlund Farm • Valley Medical Center Connections • Benson Neighborhood Greenway (proposed #5) (North to South) • Talbot Road S Bike Lanes (existing and proposed #74) • SW 27th Street Connector (proposed #73) • SE Petrovitsky Rd Shared Use Path (proposed #63) Cost Existing Cross - Section $$$$ ($1.5M - $5M) N/A Speed Limit N/A Considerations Requires some property acquisition or easements. Likely to have sensitive areas impacts and environ- mental constraints. Location Map Facility Soft Surface Trail � m Boardwalk t0 r 53) Powerline Trail Project Description Limits (Start/End) Length Destinations (West to East) Connections (West to East) Cost Existing Cross - Section Speed Limit Considerations Improve existing soft surface trail along Puget Sound Energy powerlines that provides a connection to the Cedar River. Need to formalize and secure easements for use. Benson Road S to both the Cedar River Trail and SE Royal Hills Drive. 1.56 miles • Cedar River Natural Area • Benson Road/Main Ave S Bike Lanes (proposed #6) • Thunder Creek Trail (proposed #75) • Seattle Waterline Trail (proposed #65) • Cedar River Trail $$ ($100,000 - $500,000) N/A N/A Location Map Facility Soft Surface Trail 54) Puget Drive Bike Lanes & Signed Shared Roadway Project Description Develop signed shared roadway on Puget Drive SE from Benson Road S to Grant Ave S. Construct buffered bike lanes from Rolling Hills Ave SE to 1 16th Avenue SE. Limits Benson Road S to 1 16th Avenue SE (Start/End) Length 0.99 miles Destinations (West to East) Connections • Benson Road/Main Ave S Bike Lanes (proposed (West to East) #6) • Grant Avenue Neighborhood Greenway (proposed #15) • Cascade Waterline Spur Trail (proposed #7) • Seattle Waterline Trail (proposed #65) • 1 16th Avenue Bike Lanes (proposed #1) Cost $$$ ($500,000 - $1.5M) Existing Cross- 1 lane in each direction Section Speed Limit 35 MPH Considerations A shared roadway is less desirable for lower Puget Drive, which is Level of Traffic Stress 3 and A. Buffered or protected bike lanes may be feasible on lower Puget Drive if a road diet is implement- ed from Benson Road S to Rolling Hills Avenue SE. Further study is required; consider narrowing vehicle travel lanes from 12' to 10' to accommodate buffered bike lanes. Location Map Facility "h. Bike Lane Signed Shared Roadway Alternate Facility m Z q � � Shared Use Path i 55) Renton Connector Project Description Develop a combination of shared use path and protected bike lanes along Burnett Avenue S and Burnett Place S in Downtown. Limits Airport Way to S 7th Street (Start/End) Length 0.59 miles Destinations • Memorial Stadium (North to South) • Cedar River Trail • Downtown • Renton High School • Piazza Park • Tonkin Park Connections Logan Avenue Trail Shared Use Path (existing (North to South) and proposed #31) • Lake Washington Loop Trail (existing and proposed #29) • S 2nd Street Protected Bike Lanes (proposed #57) • S 3rd Street Signed Shared Roadway (proposed #58) • Lake to Sound Trail: East Segment (proposed #27) • SSW 7th Street Transit Connector (proposed #59) • Benson Drive S/108th Avenue SE Shared Use M Path (proposed #4) Cost $$$$ ($1.5M - $5M) Existing Cross- 1 lane in each direction Section M Speed Limit 25 MPH Considerations The Renton Connector is an facility consistent with the Civic Core Plan. This project creates a critical connection between regional trails serving Renton. Location Map Facility Shared Use Path off° Two Way Protected Bike Lane 56) Renton Park Neighborhood Greenway Project Description Develop a neighborhood greenway south of SE 168th Street along SE 170th Place, SE 172nd Street and 1 30th Avenue SE to Renton Park where there are currently soft surface trails. Limits SE 1 68th Street to Renton Park (Start/End) Length 1.18 miles Destinations Renton Park (West to East) Renton Park Elementary Charles A Lindbergh High School Connections SE 1 68th Street Protected Bike Lanes (proposed (West to East) #61 ) • Tiffany Park Neighborhood Greenway (proposed #77) • 1 28th Avenue SE Bike Lanes (proposed #2) • Soos Creek Trail (proposed #67) I Cost $$$ ($500,000 - $1.5 M) Existing Cross- 1 lane in each direction Section I Speed Limit 25 MPH Considerations These streets already have some neighborhood greenway features, such as speed bumps. The proposed King County Soos Creek Shared Use Trail will likely be located through Renton Park. Location Map Facility Neighborhood Greenway 57) S 2nd Street Project Description Construct a two-way protected bike lane on the south side of N 2nd Street between Rainier Avenue S and Burnett Avenue S and create a signed shared roadway between Burnett Avenue S and Mill Avenue S. Limits Rainier Avenue S to Mill Avenue S (Start/End) Length 0.67 miles Destinations (West to East) Connections • Shattuck to Airport Connector (proposed #65) (West to East) • Renton High School • Renton Connector (proposed #54) • Piazza Park • Wells Avenue Signed Shared Roadway (proposed #79) • Mill Avenue S Signed Shared Roadway (proposed #35) • Renton Library Cost $$$ ($500,000 - $1.5 M) Existing Cross- 2 lanes in one direction (existing); Section 1 lane in each direction (proposed) Speed Limit M 25 MPH Considerations Study the feasibility constructing a shared use path through private property between Rainier Avenue S and Hardie Avenue SW to connect the S Second Street bike lanes to Hardie Avenue SW. Location Map Face►ty m Z v off° m Two Way Protected Bike Lane 58) S 3rd Street Signed Shared Roadway Project Description As a short-term facility prior to constructing the proposed S 2nd Street Protected Bike Lanes, designate S 3rd Street as a signed shared roadway. Limits Rainier Avenue S to Main Avenue S (Start/End) Length 0.62 miles Destinations Renton High School (West to East) • Piazza Park • Renton History Museum • Veterans Memorial Park • Renton Library Connections Shattuck to Airport Connector (proposed #66) (West to East) Renton Connector (proposed #55) • Wells Avenue S Signed Shared Roadway (proposed #80) • Lake to Sound Trail: East Segment (existing and proposed #27) Cost $$ ($100,000 - $500,000) Existing Cross- 2 lanes in one direction (existing); Section 1 lane in each direction (proposed) M Speed Limit 25 MPH Considerations The intersection at Main Avenue and Houser Way needs further study. Location Map Facility Signed Shared Roadway IM 59) S/SW 7th Street Transit Connector Project Description Develop a shared use path along the north side of SW 7th Street between Naches Avenue SW and Burnett Avenue S. Limits Naches Avenue SW to Burnett Avenue S (Start/End) Length 1.18 miles Destinations • Proposed Transit Hub (West to East) Connections • Naches Avenue Shared Use Path (proposed #41) (West to East) • Lake to Sound Trail: West Segment (proposed #28) • Hardie Avenue Bike Lane and Shared Use Path (proposed #16) • Shattuck to Airport Connector (proposed #66) • Lake to Sound Trail: East Segment (proposed #27) • Renton Connector (proposed #55) • Benson Drive S/108th Avenue SE Shared Use Path (proposed #4) Cost $$$$$ (Over $5M) Existing Cross- 2 lane in each direction (center turn lane near Section Rainier Ave S) Speed Limit 30 MPH Considerations Coordinate with Sound Transit and King County to ensure safe access into and out of proposed transit center. Alternate route for the Lake to Sound Trail. Location Map Facility m Z v e m a a � Shared Use Path tO IRJ 60) Sam Chastain Waterfront Trail Project Description Construct the planned Sam Chastain Waterfront Trail from the end of the existing water walk at the Cedar River Boathouse to the existing paved path at the south end of Gene Coulon Memorial Beach Park. Limits Cedar River Boathouse to Gene Coulon Memorial (Start/End) Beach Park Length 0.38 miles Destinations Cedar River Trail (West to East) Cedar River Boathouse • Lake Washington • Gene Coulon Memorial Beach Park Connections Existing Cedar River Trail (West to East) Cost $$$$$ (Over $5M) Existing Cross- N/A Section Speed Limit N/A Considerations The trail transitions between an over water boardwalk to soft surface trail and ultimately to a paved trail and requires easements. Location Map Facility Soft Surface Trail Boardwalk 61) SE 168th Street Protected Bike Lanes Project Description Provide a 2-way protected bike lane on the south side of SE 168th Street from 108th Avenue SE to 1 28th Avenue SE. Serves Lindbergh High School and Renton Park Elementary School. Access to proposed Soos Creek Trail. Limits 108th Avenue SE to 1 28th Avenue SE (Start/End) Length 1.26 miles Destinations Renton Park Elementary School (West to East) Lindbergh High School Connections Benson Road/Main Avenue S Bike Lanes (West to East) (proposed #6) • 1 16th Avenue SE Bike Lanes (proposed #1) • Renton Park Neighborhood Greenway (proposed #55) • Tiffany Park Neighborhood Greenway (proposed #77) • 1 28th Avenue SE Bike Lanes (proposed #2) • Soos Creek Trail (proposed #67) Cost $$ ($100,000 - $500,000) Existing Cross- 1 lane in each direction Section Speed Limit 30 MPH Considerations Study the feasibility of dropping a turn lane at the 1 16th Avenue SE and 108th Avenue SE intersections. Requires removal of three corner extensions and consolidation of parking on the north side of the street. Location Map Facility m Z v n Two Way Protected Bike Lane t0 r 62) SE 182nd & SE 184th Streets Neighborhood Greenway Project Description Develop a neighborhood greenway along SE 182nd Street and SE 184th Street. Limits 108th Avenue SE and the proposed Soos Creek (Start/End) Trail Length 1.12 miles Destinations (West to East) Connections Benson Drive S/108th Avenue SE Shared Use (West to East) Path (proposed #4) • 1 16th Avenue SE Bike Lanes (proposed #1) • Soos Creek Trail (proposed #67) Cost Existing Cross - Section Speed Limit Considerations $$$ ($500,000 - $1.5 M) 1 lane in each direction 25 MPH Location Map Facility m Z a n 1� m Neighborhood Greenway tp �r 1 j 63) SE Petrovitsky Road Shared Use Path Project Description Develop a shared use path converting existing sidewalk on the north side of SW 43rd St/S Carr Road/SE Petrovitsky Road from Tukwila City Limits to 1 34th Ave SE (City Limits). Limits Talbot Road S and 1 34th Avenue SE (City Limits) (Start/End) Length 3.82 miles Destinations Valley Medical Center (West to East) Edlund Farm Soos Creek Park Connections I • Talbot Road S Bike Lanes (proposed #73) (West to East) Panther Creek Trail (proposed #52) • Benson Drive S/108th Avenue SE Shared Use Path (proposed #4) • 1 16th Avenue SE Bike Lanes (proposed #1) • 1 28th Avenue SE Bike Lanes (proposed #2) • Soos Creek Trail (proposed #66) I Cost $$$$$ (Over $5M) Existing Cross- 2 lanes in each direction and a center turn lane Section I Speed Limit 35 MPH Considerations Location Map Facility m Z v a ew> 0� D e � m q � Shared Use Path tO 64) Seattle Waterline Spur Trail Project Description Improve existing soft surface trail from the Seattle Waterline Trail that provides a connection to the Cedar River. Limits SE Royal Hills Road to both the Cedar River and to (Start/End) SE 160th Street Length 1.39 miles Destinations • Cedar River (North to South) Connections • Seattle Waterline Trail (proposed #65) (North to South) I • Tiffany -Cascade Connector Trail (proposed #76) • Cascade Waterline Spur Trail (proposed #7) Cost $ (Under $100,000) Existing Cross- Soft surface trail Section I Speed Limit N/A Considerations Need to formalize and secure easements for use. Location Map Facility Soft Surface Trail 65) Seattle Waterline Trail Project Description Develop a signed shared roadway from S 7th St south via Beacon Way S to Puget Drive SE. Create a shared use path from Puget Drive SE to 1 32nd Place SE/the proposed Soos Creek Trail (City Limits). Limits S 7th Street to 1 32nd Place SE/Soon Creek Trail (Start/End) (City Limits) Length 2.06 miles Destinations • Phillip Arnold Park (North to South) I • Tiffany Park Elementary School • Tiffany Park • Hazen High School Connections • Grant Avenue Neighborhood Greenway (North to South) I (proposed #15) • Puget Drive SE Bike Lanes (proposed #54) • 1 16th Avenue SE Bike Lanes (proposed #1) • Tiffany Park Neighborhood Greenway (proposed #77) • Tiffany -Cascade Connector Trail (proposed #76) • Cascade Waterline Spur Trail (proposed #7) • Soos Creek Trail (proposed #67) • Benson Neighborhood Greenway (proposed #5) I Cost $$$$ ($1.5M - $5M) Existing Cross- Seattle Public Utilities corridor, varies from 60 to Section 1100-feet wide Speed Limit N/A Considerations Requires coordination with Seattle Public Utilities to establish agreement for non -motorized easement and facility. The shared use path segment from 1 16th Avenue SE and the City Limits could be an improved soft surface trail. Location Map Facility Shared Use Path 0 F Signed Shared Roadway Alternate Facility Soft Surface Trail 66) Shattuck to Airport Connector Project Description Connect Airport Way to S 7th Street with a signed shared roadway along Shattuck Avenue S, S Tobin Street, and Lake Avenue S. Limits Airport Way to S 7th Street (Start/End) Length 0.90 miles Destinations • Renton High School (North to South) I • Proposed Transit Hub Connections • Lake Washington Loop Trail (existing and (North to South) I proposed #29) • S 2nd Street Protected Bike Lanes (proposed #57) • S 3rd Street Signed Shared Roadway (proposed #58) • Lake to Sound Trail: West Segment (proposed #28) • Lake to Sound Trail: East Segment (proposed #27) • SSW 7th Street Transit Connector (proposed #58) Cost $$ ($100,000 - $500,000) Existing Cross- 1 lane in each direction Section Speed Limit 25 MPH Considerations Crossing at the intersection of S 2nd Street and Lake Avenue S needs further study. Coordinate with Renton Airport Master Plan. Location Map Facility m Z o n Signed Shared Roadway t0 r 67) Soos Creek Trail Project Description Coordinate with King County Parks on final design and construction of the Soos Creek Trail. Limits SR 169 to SE 1 92nd Street (Start/End) Length 4.00 miles (2.05 within Renton City Limits) Destinations • Cedar River Trail (North to South) I • Soos Creek Park • Lindbergh High School • Renton Park Elementary School • Renton Park • Boulevard Lane Park I• Meeker Middle School Connections • Seattle Waterline Trail (proposed #65) (North to South) I • Benson Neighborhood Greenway (proposed #5) • Renton Park Neighborhood Greenway (proposed #56) • SE Petrovitsky Road Shared Use Path (proposed #63) • SE 1 82nd & 1 84th Streets Neighborhood Greenway (proposed # 62) Cost Existing Cross - Section Speed Limit Considerations King County is the lead agency N/A N/A Location Map Facility o ff° P p o Shared Use Path 68) South Highlands Neighborhood Greenway Project Description Develop a neighborhood greenway along NE 7th Street, NE 5th Place, NE 6th Street, from Kirkland Avenue NE to the City Limits. Limits Sunset Boulevard NE to Shadow Avenue NE (City (Start/End) Limits) Length 3.35 miles Destinations • Highlands Park and Community Center (West to East) • Highlands Elementary School • Renton Technical College • Kiwanis Park I Connections • Sunset Boulevard Hillclimb (proposed #71) (West to East) • Edmonds Avenue Connector (proposed #1 2) • Harrington Avenue NE Neighborhood Greenway (proposed #17) • Hillcrest Neighborhood Greenway (proposed #19) • Monroe Avenue Bike Lanes (proposed #37) • Union Avenue NE Bike Lanes (proposed #79) • Duvall Avenue NE Bike Lanes (existing and proposed #9) • Jericho Avenue NE Bike Lanes (proposed #23) • Nile Avenue NE Bike Lanes (proposed #47) Cost $$$ ($500,000 - $1.5 M) Existing Cross- 1 lane in each direction Section Speed Limit 25 MPH Considerations I Location Map Facility m Z v a n m Neighborhood Greenway t0 69) Springbrook Trail Project Description Complete the Springbrook Trail. Limits SW 19th to SW 23rd Streets to SW 41 st to SW (Start/End) 43rd Streets Length 0.46 miles Destinations • Renton Wetlands (North to South) Connections • SW 27th Street Connector (proposed #73) (North to South) • Oakesdale Avenue Bike Lanes (existing and proposed #50) I Cost $$$$ ($1.5M - $5M) Existing Cross - Section Speed Limit Considerations Boardwalk, soft surface trail and hard surface trail N/A Location Map Facility m Z a p p \p o ha.M.Ep D W m � Shared Use Path tp 70) Springbrook Trail Extension Project Description Connect Springbrook Trail to Lake to Sound Trail with a shared use path adjacent to the existing sidewalk along Oakesdale Ave SE/Monster Road SW. Limits Monster Road SW to Black River Trail (Start/End) Length 0.48 miles Destinations Springbrook Trail (West to East) Monster Road SW Bike Lanes • Black River Riparian Forest • Metro Waterworks Gardens Park M Connections Lake to Sound Trail: West Segment (existing and (West to East) proposed #28) • Riparian Forest Trail • Black River Trail Cost Existing Cross - Section Speed Limit Considerations $$$$ ($1.5M - $5M) 2 lanes in each direction with a center turn lane 35 MPH Location Map Facility m Z a � Shared Use Path tp 71) Sunset Boulevard Hillclimb Project Description Install an uphill bike lane and downhill signed shared lane on Sunset Boulevard NE from N Southport Drive to 1-405. Limits NE Sunset Boulevard to 1-405 (Start/End) M Length 0.99 miles Destinations (North to South) Connections • North Southport Drive Shared Use Path (North to South) (proposed #49) M• Kennydale Neighborhood Greenway (proposed #24) • South Highlands Neighborhood Greenway (proposed #68) • Highlands Hillclimb (proposed #18) • Houser Way N Shared Use Path (proposed #22) Cost $$ ($100,000 - $500,000) Existing Cross- 1 lane in each direction with turn lanes at intersec- Section tions M Speed Limit 30 MPH Considerations Accommodation of uphill bike lane may require dropping the turn lanes. Crossing of freeway on and off -ramps needs further study to ensure safety. Location Map Facility Signed Shared Lane DownlBike Lane Up 72) SW 16th Street Shared Use Path Project Description Construct a shared use path on the south side of SW 16th Street. North side west of Lind Avenue SW, south side east of Lind Avenue SW. Limits Oakesdale Avenue SW to East Valley Road (Start/End) Length 0.59 miles Destinations (West to East) Connections • Springbrook Trail (West to East) • Oakesdale Avenue SW Bike Lanes • East Valley Road Shared Use Path (proposed M #10) Cost $$$$ ($1.5M - $5M) Existing Cross- 1 lane in each direction with a center turn lane Section M Speed Limit 35 MPH Considerations Portions of this route must be shared sidewalk due to existing mature trees. Location Map Facility m z 0 a � Shared Use Path tp 73) SW 27th Street Connector Project Description Develop a shared use path between Tukwila city limits and the proposed Panther Creek Trail as an east -west connection to Tukwila and Tukwila Sounder Station. Incorporate the existing shared use path on the south side of roadway between Naches Avenue SW and Oakesdale Avenue SW. Limits West City Limits to Panther Creek Trail (Start/End) Length 1.05 miles (0.94 within Renton City Limits) Destinations • Interurban Trail (West to East) • Tukwila Sounder Station • Renton Wetlands • Springbrook Trail M Connections • Tukwila Station Trail (proposed #78) (West to East) • Oakesdale Avenue SW Bike Lanes (existing and proposed #50) • Panther Creek Trail (proposed #52) Cost $$$$$ (Over $5M) Existing Cross- West of Lind Avenue SW: 2 lanes in each direction Section East of Lind Avenue SW: 1 lane in each direction with a center turn lane Speed Limit 35 MPH Considerations Shared use path construction adjacent to Renton Wetlands may be prohibitive due to potential wetland impacts. Crossing of SR 167 needs further study. Location Map Face►ty m Z e m a a � Shared Use Path tp 74) Talbot Road S Bike Lanes Project Description Create bike lanes on Talbot Road S between Benson Drive S and S Carr Road. Continue bike lanes from S 1 92nd St southward to S 200th Street. Limits Benson Drive S to S 200th Street (Start/End) Length 2.07 miles Destinations • Talbot Hill Elementary School (North to South) I • Edlund Farm • Valley Medical Center • Cleveland -Richardson Park I Connections • Benson Drive S Shared Use Path (proposed #A) (North to South) I • Benson Neighborhood Greenway (proposed #5) • Panther Creek Trail (proposed #52) • SE Petrovitsky Road Shared Use Path (proposed #63) Cost $$$ ($500,000 - $1.5 M) Existing Cross- North of Carr Road: 1 lane in each direction Section South of Carr Road: 1 lanes in each direction with a center turn lane Speed Limit 30 MPH Considerations Narrow shoulders in most locations north of Carr Road. Consider adding 2-foot wide buffers to the existing Talbot Road bike lanes from Carr Road to S 192nd Street by narrowing the vehicle travel lanes where possible. Location Map Facility Alternate Facility m Z I ZL v off° off° n m � Bike Lane Buffered Bike Lane r 75) Thunder Creek Trail Project Description Improve the surface of the Thunder Creek Trail. Extend the trail from the south end of Cedar Avenue S to the north end of the existing Thunder Creek Trail. Limits (Start/End) Length Destinations (North to South) Connections (North to South) Cost Existing Cross - Section Speed Limit Considerations Cedar Avenue S to the north end of the existing Thunder Creek Trail. 0.21 miles • Thunder Creek Trail • Grant Avenue Neighborhood Greenway (proposed #15) $$ ($100,000 - $500,000) Soft surface N/A The extension to Cedar Avenue requires an easement across the Puget Sound Energy powerline corridor. Location Map Facility Soft Surface Trail 76) Tiffany -Cascade Connector Trail Project Description Formalize the soft surface trail connecting Tiffany and Cascade Parks. Limits Tiffany Park to SE 160th Street (Start/End) Length 0.14 miles Destinations • Tiffany Park (North to South) • Cascade Park Connections • Seattle Waterline Trail (proposed #65) (North to South) • Tiffany Park Neighborhood Greenway (proposed #77) • Cascade Waterline Trail Spur (proposed #6) M Cost $ (Under $100,000) Existing Cross- N/A Section Speed Limit N/A Considerations Requires easements across Cascade Waterline. Location Map Facility Soft Surface Trail 77) Tiffany Park Neighborhood Greenway Project Description Develop a neighborhood greenway connecting the Tiffany Park and Renton Park neighborhoods. Limits 1 16th Avenue SE to SE 172nd Street (Start/End) Length 1.61 miles Destinations • Tiffany Park Elementary School (North to South) I • Tiffany Park • Cascade Park I Connections 1 16th Avenue SE Bike Lanes (proposed #1) (North to South) Seattle Waterline Trail (proposed #65) Cascade Waterline Spur Trail (proposed #7) • Benson Neighborhood Greenway (proposed #5) • SE 1 68th Protected Bike Lanes (proposed #61) • Renton Park Neighborhood Greenway (proposed #56) Cost $$$ ($500,000 - $1.5 M) Existing Cross- 1 lane in each direction Section I Speed Limit 25 MPH Considerations Location Map Facility Neighborhood Greenway 78) Tukwila Station Trail Project Description Develop a paved shared use path south of SW 16th Street along the east side of the BNSF right of way (City Limits) and Tukwila Station. Limits Longacres Drive SW to SW 27th Street (Start/End) Length 0.58 miles Destinations • Tukwila Sounder Station (North to South) Connections • SW 16th Street Bike Lanes (North to South) • SW 27th Street Connector (proposed #72) Cost $$$$ ($1.5M - $5M) Existing Cross- L N/A Section Speed Limit N/A Considerations Negotiation with BNSF, Sound Transit and possibly Boeing required. Trail must integrate with station access improvements on the east side of the track. Location Map Facility m z 0 a p p \p o ha.M.Ep D W m � Shared Use Path tp 79) Union Avenue NE Bike Lanes Project Description Construct bike lanes on Union Avenue NE. Limits NE 27th Place (City Limits) to SE 2nd Place (Start/End) Length 2.88 miles (2.43 within Renton City Limits) Destinations • May Creek Trail (North to South) I • Sierra Heights Elementary School • Honey Dew Elementary School • Kiwanis Park • Heritage Park Connections I • Glencoe Neighborhood Greenway (proposed (North to South) #1 4) • NE Sunset Boulevard Shared Use Path (proposed #46) • NE 12 Street Bike Lanes (proposed #44) • North Highlands Neighborhood Greenway (proposed #48) • South Highlands Neighborhood Greenway (proposed #68) • NE 4th Street Bike Lanes (existing and proposed #43) • Maplewood Heights Neighborhood Greenway (proposed #32) Cost $$$$ ($1.5M - $5M) Existing Cross- 1 lane in each direction Section I Speed Limit 25 MPH Considerations Where possible, narrow vehicle travel lanes to ac- commodate buffered bike lanes. Alternate: 2-way protected bike lane on the east side of Union. Location Map Facility v m 0 Bike Lane Alternate Facility m Z v v n Buffered Bike Lane t0 80) Wells Avenue S Signed Shared Roadway Project Description Limits (Start/End) Length Destinations (North to South) Connections (North to South) Cost Existing Cross - Section Speed Limit Considerations Develop a signed shared roadway on Wells Avenue. Bronson Way N to Houser Way S 0.66 miles • Jones Park • S 2nd Street Protected Bike Lanes (proposed #57) • S 3rd Street Signed Shared Roadway (proposed #58) M• Lake to Sound Trail: East Segment (existing and proposed #27) $ (Under $100,000) 1 lane in each direction 25 MPH Location Map Facility Signed Shared Roadway ); AGENDA ITEM # 9. b) D. PROJECT PRIORITIZATION DOCUMENTATION AGENDA ITEM # 9. b) AGENDA ITEM # 9. b) Project Prioritization January 2019 j Renton Trails and Bicycle Master Plan As part of outreach in fall 2017, the City of Renton drafted prioritization criteria with the community: ■ Safety and Trail Experience ■ Connectivity and Accessibility ■ Equity ■ Economy and Community ■ Construction and Implementation Eighty projects were scored with prioritization criteria. Each category was weighted with Connectivity and Accessibility and Safety and Trail Experience weighted more highly, Equity weighted moderately, and Economy and Community and Construction and Implementation weighted lower. For each category, indicators or variables were developed. For each indicator, project evaluation criteria were developed, and each rated on either a 3-part high, medium, or low range or a 5-part high, medium -high, medium, medium -low, and low range. The table below addresses the indicators and variables. The Attachment provides more detail and definition of the scoring. Exhibit 1. Prioritization Criteria and Indicators Connectivity and Does the project: Accessibility ■ Fill a gap between existing facilities, or Weight: 30% ■ Fill gap in area with no/few facilities, or ■ Remove pedestrian and/or bicycle barriers? Safety and Trail Experience Weight: 30% To what extent does this project improve pedestrian/bike access to schools? Does this project offer connections to parks, recreation, or natural areas? Does the project increase the extent of the low stress (LTS 1 or 2) network? Does the project enhance the natural environment experience? Does the project address a known issue regarding user experience (intersections, slope/terrain, lighting, wayfinding, formalize informal trail, etc.)? Equity Does the project reach a large number of people and jobs? Weight: 20% Does the project improve bicycle or pedestrian access for users older than Age 64 and/or users younger than Age 18? Does the project improve bicycle or pedestrian access for the city's Households in Poverty? :ill AGENDA ITEM # 9. b) Economy and Community Does the project leverage plans or priorities? Weight: 10% Does the project improve access to high density residential or commercial zones, transit, or services? Construction and Implementation Weight: 10% Does the project reflect public feedback? Is the project a strong candidate for possible grants? To what extent can the project be implemented with future construction? Is the project reasonably attainable? Is the cost reasonably balanced with potential benefits? Source: City of Renton, 2018; BERK, 2018. Tiers & Results Once scored, three tiers of projects were developed: Highest Priority, High Priority, and Medium Priority. The City used two qualitative criteria in addition to prioritization scores to develop the Highest Priority projects list (Tier 1 ): partnership commitments and geographic equity. Thus, the top scoring projects include the highest scoring projects, plus projects with known commitments, and projects that are opportunistic, feasible in the near term, enhance connectivity across planning areas, or assist with geographic equity. Since some projects had identical scores, there were 27 projects in Tier 1, 26 projects in Tier 2, and 27 projects in Tier 3. Exhibit 2. Prioritization Process Source: BERK, 2018. Project tiers are nearly equal in length, but Tier 1 projects emphasize Shared Use Paths, and complete all Protected Bike Lanes. Striped Bike Lanes are also increased. Implementation of Neighborhood Greenways is initiated but is a smaller share than in later phases. Tier 2 continues to advance Shared Use Paths, adds Striped Bike Lanes, and adds Neighborhood Greenways, plus implements most Pedestrian Trails. Tier 3 completes the network with the emphasis on Neighborhood Greenways, as well as Striped Bike Lanes, and Shared Use Paths. 'i11 January 2019 City of Renton I Project Prioritization 2 AGENDA ITEM # 9. b) Exhibit 3. Project Tiers by Project Type Shared Use Path 16.51 6.36 Protected Bike Lane 3.05 - Protected Bike Lane 0.39 - Two -Way Protected Bike Lane 2.66 - Striped Bike Lane 6.99 8.24 Striped Bike Lane 6.99 7.45 Buffered Bike Lane - 0.79 Neighborhood Greenway 1.39 14.42 Signed Shared Roadway 1.56 5.24 Pedestrian Trail 3.05 0.49 Boa rdwa I k 0.18 - Hard SurfaceTraiI - - Soft Surfa ce Tra i 1 2.87 0.49 Total 32.54 34.75 Source: City of Renton, 201 8; BERK, 2018. ATTACHMENT: RATING KEY AND RATING RESULTS �111 January 2019 City of Renton I Project Prioritization 3 30% 30% 20% 10% 10% Crosses a significant barrier Improves crossings or Improves crossings or Improves crossings or Project does not meet Medium GIS Data: Community Input Does the project: (freeway, waterway) or fully intersections or removes other intersections or removes other intersections or removes other Low criteria (Walking and Biking) Y > Fill a gap between existing facilities connects two existing facilities barriers along high volume major barriers along medium volume barriers along low volume local > Fill gap in area with no/few facilities arterials, or partially fills gap collector arterial, or extends street, , or extends current facility -0 > Remove pedestrian and/or bicycle between two existing facilities current facility over 1 mile less than 1 mile 01 u barriers? u a r --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- To what extent does this project Connections to 2 or more schools Connection to 1 school (within Improves more than 25% of Improves less than 25% of Project does not meet Medium GIS Data: LTS Service Area f0 improve ped/bike access to schools? (within 1/4 mile) 1/2 mile) barriers (sidewalk gaps or barriers within "walk to school" Low criteria (Existing and Proposed Trails) obstructions, missing curb ramps) route options within "walk to school" route u Does this project offer connections to Connections to 2 or more existing Connections to 2 or more existing Connections to 1 or more parks Fewer connections than Medium, Project does not meet Medium GIS Data: Existing and Proposed vparks, recreation or natural areas? developed parks or natural areas developed parks or existing (existing, undeveloped, proposed) or greater distances than Low criteria Trails (within 1/4 mile) natural areas (within 1/2 mile) or existing natural areas (within Medium, or connections to future 1/2 mile) parks and natural areas only w L Q. LU -0 a � N Does the project increase the extent of Project proposed is LTS 1 or 2 and the low stress (LTS 1 or 2) network? connects to an EXISTING LTS 1 or 2 facility ___ Does the project enhance the natural Project provides or has potential environment experience? to provide direct water access ----------------------------------------- Does the project address a known issue Intersects or connects to 2 or regarding user experience (intersections, more major/primary arterials OR slope/terrain, lighting, wayfinding, addresses > 2 known user formalize informal trail, etc.)? experience issues Intersects or connects to 1 or more major/primary arterials OR addresses 2 known user experience issues Project proposed is LTS 1 or 2 Project improves the user appreciation of the natural environment ---------------------------------------- Intersects or connects to 1 minor Addresses 1 known user arterial or collector and addresses experience within project limits 1 known user experience issue Project proposed is LTS 3 or 4 GIS Data: LTS Service Area (Existing and Proposed Trails) Project does not meet criteria for Internal Project Team High or Medium ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------- No known issues regarding user GIS Data and Parks Plan experience with the project limits Does the project reach a large number Project is within or connects Project is within or connects Project is within or connects Project is within or connects Project is within quarter mile of of people and jobs? within a quarter mile of census within a quarter mile of census within a quarter mile of census within a quarter mile of census census blocks or tracts with less tracts with greater than 15 tracts with greater than 15 tracts having 10-15 persons per tracts having 10-15 persons per than 10 persons per acre (existing GIS Data: Population Density persons per acre (existing or persons per acre (existing or acre (existing or planned) AND acre (existing or planned) OR or planned) and/or low job (Existing and Proposed Trails) planned) AND High Job Density planned) OR High Job Density Medium Job Density Medium Job Density density !r -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Does the project improve bicycle or Project connects 2 or more --------------------------------------- Project is within census tract or ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Project does not meet criteria for a pedestrian access for users older than census tracts with share of quarter mile of census tract with High or Medium W Age 64 and/or users younger than Age residents Age 64+ AND Age 18- g g share of residents Age 64+ OR g RCO Grant Application Data Tool 18? that is greater than city average Age 18- that is greater than city ---- __________________________________________________________________________________________L2iMP Does the project improve bicycle or Project is within or connects to 2 --------------- ________________ Project is within or connects to a _________________________________________ Project does not meet any of the pedestrian access for the city's or more low income census low income census tract. criteria for High or Medium. RCO Grant Application Data Tool Households in Poverty? tracts. Does the project leverage plans or Included in adopted Community Project aligns with community Project is not aligned with priorities? Plan, Subarea Plan, or Master priorities but requires community priorities Community Plans Plan, or City Council Goals or amendment of an adopted plan (Internal Project Team) other adopted plan or program 3 E ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Does the project improve access to high Project connects to location Project connects to location ---------------------------------------- Project connects to location Project connects to location ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Any employment location is more pdensity residential or commercial zones, within 1/4 mile, or connects to within 1/2 mile or to a Local within 3/4 mile within 1 mile than 1 mile from project. GIS Data: Trail Access (Existing U transit, or services? Regional Trail Primary Route and Proposed Trails) r Does the project reflect public Project received high number of Project received some Project did not receive particular Ofeedback? public requests/comments during requests/comments during plan stakeholder input � plan update, OR was update GIS Data: Community Input w recommended in a similar (Walking, Other Ideas or Issues) planning process, or was recommended by an Advisory Is the project a strong candidate for Potential for multiple grant High profile project if not high or medium possible grants? opportunities ---------------------------------------- ------ ------------------------------------------------------- Internal Project Team a - - - - ------------------------------------------------------------------------- To what extent can the project be Project is included in 6-year CIP Project is included in 6-year CIP Project is included in 7-20 year Project fits CIP criteria but Project is not included in current C implemented with future construction? with secured funding but with undetermined funding or project list requires CIP amendment CIP and cannot be implemented Cm can be implemented with other with other public or private Internal Project Team u W public or private development development ______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ T Is the project reasonably attainable? Is Project is feasible and practicable. Requires acquisition but no Minor adjustment to Modest adjustment to Requires the purchase or C£ the cost reasonably balanced with It does not require property existing building structure or use improvement or use, and site improvement or use, and site negotiation of ROW and affects C1 — potential benefits? acquisition. will be affected. continues to conform to City use, continues to conform to City use, existing building structures or Internal Project Team parking, and road standards. Less parking, and road standards. Less access to existing building than 10% of project cost. than 20% of project cost. structures (incl. a AGENDA ITEM # 9. b) Criteria Evaluation Ranking Project Number Project Name: Score: Connectivity and Accessibility Evaluation Safety and Trail Experience Evaluation Equity Evaluation Economy and Community Evaluation Construction and Implementation Evaluation 1 55 Renton Connector Lake to Sound Trail: West Segment 98% Is * . I. QO 1 28 98% . . . 3 57 S 2nd Street Protected Bike Lanes 93% . . . . 4 69 Springbrook Trail 91% . . . 5 11 Eastside Rail Corridor Cascade Waterline Spur Trail 89% . . . 5 7 89% . . 3 7 29 Lake Washington Loop Trail 87% . . I. 7 73 SW 27th Street Connector Lake to Sound Trail: East Segment 87% . 7 27 87% 84% . . I. . QO QO 10 60 Sam Chastain Water Trail 10 46 NE Sunset Blvd Shared Use Path 84% . 0 QO 19 12 67 Edmonds Avenue Connector Soos Creek Trail 84% 0 3 10 84% , . O 4 I. 14 20 Honey Creek Trail Extension 76% . O . 3 14 34 May Creek Trail 73% . 3 14 9 Duvall Ave NE Bike Lanes 67% . O O 14 80 Wells Avenue S Signed Shared Roadway 58% 0 3 . 14 43 NE 4th Street Bike Lanes 53% O , 3 19 21 22 Houser Way and Factory Avenue Houser Way N Shared Use Path 82% . QO QO 19 82% . 3 i QO 19 13 Garden Avenue N Shared Use Path 82% . Q . O 22 17 Harrington Ave NE Neighborhood Greenway 80% QO . QO 22 61 SE 168th Street Protected Bike Lanes 80% . 3 QO 24 1 116th Avenue SE Bike Lanes 78% . . QO 24 59 S/SW 7TH Street Transit Corridor 78% 3 . . QO 24 38 N 4th Street Connector 78% Q . 3 3 24 41 Naches Avenue Shared Use Path 78% QO . 3 28 63 SE Petrovitsky Road Shared Use Path 76% . . 3 28 64 Seattle Waterline Spur Trail 76% . QO O 28 65 Seattle Waterline Trail 76% . QO O 28 70 Springbrook Trail Extension 76% 3 32 49 North Southport Drive Shared Use Path 73% 3 32 53 Powerline Trail 73% QO O 32 76 Tiffany -Cascade Connector Trail 73% QO . O a 3 35 31 Logan Ave N Shared Use Path 71% 3 . 3 35 6 Benson Road/Main Avenue S Bike Lanes 71% . O 37 79 Union Avenue NE Bike Lanes 69% 69% . O . 3 . 3 3 37 78 Tukwila Station Trail 37 39 N 6th Street Bike Lanes 69% QO . O 37 8 Cedar to Sammamish Trail 69% . 0 QO 0 41 26 Kenyon -Dobson Trail and Trailhead 67% . 0 QO 3 41 51 Pacific Railroad Trailhead & Trail 67% 3 . 0 QO 3 41 74 Talbot Road S Bike Lanes 67% Is 0 QO . 44 50 Oakesdale Avenue Bike Lanes 64% QO O . 3 44 66 Shattuck to Airport Connector 64% QO ( . O 44 5 Benson Neighborhood Greenway 64% 62% 62% . QO QO ( ( 3 3 O 3 QO 0 3 0 47 48 North Highlands Neighborhood Greenway 47 19 Hillcrest Neighborhood Greenway 47 36 Mill Avenue S Signed Shared Roadway 62% QO 0 . 3 50 75 Thunder Creek Trail 60% 3 3 3 O 50 37 Monroe Avenue NE Bike Lanes 60% ( Q O 50 72 SW 16th Street Shared Use Path 60% O 50 52 Panther Creek Trail 60% 0 54 40 N 8th Street Shared Use Path 56% O 3 AGENDA ITEM # 9. b) Criteria Evaluation Ranking Project Number Project Name: Score: Connectivity and Accessibility Evaluation Safety and Trail Experience Evaluation Equity Evaluation Economy and Community Evaluation Construction and Implementation Evaluation 55 16 Hardie Avenue Bike Lane & Shared Use Path 53% 0 QO 0 0 55 30 Langston Road/SW 134th Street Hillclimb 53% ( o 0 o 57 4 Benson Drive S/108th Avenue SE Shared Use Path 51% 0 a (10 o 57 42 NE 3rd Street Renton Park Neighborhood Greenway Highlands Hillclimb 51% 0 0 3 o 59 56 18 49% o QO O 59 49% 3 3 3 O 0 59 58 S 3rd Street Signed Shared Roadway 49% 0 Q . o 62 10 East Valley Road Shared Use Path 47% 62 2 128th Ave SE Bike Lanes 47% 0 0 3 62 68 South Highlands Neighborhood Greenway 47% o 0 0 62 77 Tiffany Park Neighborhood Greenway 47% . 0 0 0 0 66 44 NE 12th Street Bike Lanes 44% o o (3 QO 3 66 45 NE 16th Street Signed Shared Roadway 44% 3 3 0 3 o 66 35 May Valley Trail 44% o 0 0 0 69 71 Sunset Boulevard Hillclimb 42% o o Q o 70 33 May Creek Hillclimb 38% 0 0 0 3 70 23 Jericho Avenue NE Bike Lanes 38% 0 0 0 0 72 62 SE 182nd & 184th Streets Neighborhood Greenway 33% o 3 0 0 0 73 15 Grant Avenue Neighborhood Greenway 31% o 0 0 0 0 74 32 Maplewood Heights Neighborhood Greenway 29% 0 0 0 3 75 54 Puget Drive Bike Lanes & Signed Shared Roadway 24% 0 0 (3 3 0 75 24 Kennydale Neighborhood Greenway 24% o 0 0 0 0 77 14 Glencoe Neighborhood Greenway 22% 0 0 0 0 3 77 25 Kennydale Signed Shared Roadway 22% 0 0 0 0 3 79 47 Nile Avenue NE Bike Lanes 18% 0 0 0 0 0 so 3 156th Avenue SE Bike Lanes 16% 0 0 0 0 0 AGENDA ITEM # 9. b) E. ADOPTING RESOLUTION AGENDA ITEM # 9. b) AGENDA ITEM # 9. c) CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON, AUTHORIZING THE MAYOR AND CITY CLERK TO ENTER INTO AN INTERLOCAL AGREEMENT WITH THE CITIES OF BELLEVUE, ISSAQUAH, KIRKLAND, AND REDMOND ENTITLED "INTERLOCAL AGREEMENT ESTABLISHING A COOPERATIVE EFFORT TO SUPPORT REGIONAL ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT (Startup 425)." WHEREAS, the City of Renton (the "City") and the Cities of Bellevue, Issaquah, Kirkland, and Redmond (collectively the "Parties") are authorized, pursuant to chapter 39.34 RCW, the Interlocal Cooperation Act, to enter into an interlocal government cooperative agreement; and WHEREAS, using such quantifiable metrics as new business formation, startup density and venture capital investment, it has been shown the Parties consistently rank among the highest in startup activity within their boundaries nationwide; and WHEREAS, in recognition of that fact, the Parties created an informal program known as Startup 425, whose operations and offerings are designed to support startups and early -stage companies within the jurisdictions of the Parties; and WHEREAS, the Parties have determined that formalizing their relationship by an interlocal agreement will further the goals of Startup 425, benefit the general public served by the Parties, and enable the Parties to provide financial support toward those ends; NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON, DO fN*To]10/ffeV12r011Us] ViTI� SECTION I. The Mayor and City Clerk are hereby authorized to enter into an interlocal agreement with the Cities of Bellevue, Issaquah, Kirkland, and Redmond entitled Interlocal Agreement Establishing a Cooperative Effort to Support Regional Economic Development 1 AGENDA ITEM # 9. c) RESOLUTION NO. (Startup 425), in a form that is the same or substantially similar to the version attached hereto as Exhibit "A" and incorporated by this reference. PASSED BY THE CITY COUNCIL this day of , 2019. Jason A. Seth, City Clerk APPROVED BY THE MAYOR this day of , 2019. Approved as to form: Shane Moloney, City Attorney RES.1791:12/6/18:scr Denis Law, Mayor 2 AGENDA ITEM # 9. c) RESOLUTION NO. EXHIBIT "A" INTERLOCAL AGREEMENT ESTABLISHING A COOPERATIVE EFFORT TO SUPPORT REGIONAL ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT (Startup 425) 3 AGENDA ITEM # 9. c) RESOLUTION NO. INTERLOCAL AGREEMENT ESTABLISHING A COOPERATIVE EFFORT TO SUPPORT REGIONAL ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT (Startup 425) This agreement ("Agreement") is entered into by and between the cities of Bellevue, Issaquah, Kirkland, Redmond and Renton, municipal corporations of the State of Washington, for the purpose of promoting economic development in each of their jurisdictions. WHEREAS, using such quantifiable metrics as new business formation, startup density and venture capital investment, it has been shown the cities of Bellevue, Issaquah, Kirkland, Redmond, and Renton ("Parties") consistently rank among the highest in startup activity within their boundaries nationwide; and WHEREAS, in recognition of that fact, the Parties created an informal program known as Startup 425, whose operations and offerings are designed to support startups and early -stage companies within the jurisdictions of the Parties; and WHEREAS, the Parties have determined that formalizing their relationship by this Agreement will further the goals of Startup 425, benefit the general public served by the Parties, and enable the Parties to provide financial support toward those ends; and WHEREAS, this joint undertaking is authorized pursuant to chapter 39.34 RCW, and has been authorized by the legislative body of each Party. NOW, THEREFORE, the Parties agree as follows: INCORPORATION OF RECITALS. The Recitals set forth above are an important and integral part of this Agreement and are hereby incorporated by reference. 2. PURPOSE. The purpose of this Agreement is to acknowledge the Parties' mutual interest to jointly participate in the administration, operation, and strategy setting for Startup 425. 3. ADMINISTRATION. No new or separate legal or administrative entity is created to administer the provisions of this Agreement. Instead, the City of Kirkland will function as the administrator of Startup 425 (the "Administrator"). If necessary to change the Administrator the Parties may transfer this function to another Party by agreement of the Parties. 4. POWERS. The Administrator shall have the power to: (1) develop and recommend a budget; (2) adopt procedures to administer StartUp 425; (3) make recommendations to the Parties concerning planning, policy, and funding for StartUp 425 projects; (4) establish polices for the expenditure of budgeted items; and 5) enter into contracts, provide accounting and legal services, and execute such other contracts, agreements or other legal documents necessary for StartUp425 to carry out its purpose. 5. SCOPE. This Agreement allows the following activities: A. Host, edit, and maintain the Startup 425 website. 21 AGENDA ITEM # 9. c) RESOLUTION NO. B. Coordinate provision of the Startup 425 free workshop series for early -stage entrepreneurs in partnership with a variety of outside partners. Actively participate in the Eastside startup and small business community to promote a vibrant ecosystem of entrepreneurs and small business owners. C. Engage in a long-range planning effort by the Parties in 2019 to chart a future course for Startup 425 for growth and success, including convening a business advisory committee to identify unmet needs, revenue generating activities and a sustainable operations model, to be followed by the implementation of strategies generated by the plan in 2020. The plan may result in a recommended new organizational structure. Regardless, the Parties will review management of Startup 425 at the end of 2020 and may determine to change out or amend the current management at that time. D. Quarterly updates for all Parties that cover customers served, services provided, budget, and other items as requested by the Parties. E. Other related programs as proposed by the Administrator or the other Parties. 6. TERM AND TERMINATION. This Agreement shall become effective ("Effective Date") when signed by all Parties and shall remain in effect until December 31, 2020. Thereafter, the Agreement shall renew automatically for one-year terms ending December 31 unless any Party gives notice 30 days before the end of the then existing term that it is withdrawing from the Startup 425 program. The Agreement shall thereafter remain in effect as to the remaining Parties unless the Administrator at its sole discretion determines the Startup 425 program is no longer viable without the Party withdrawing in which event the Administrator will give notice of the date that it is withdrawing from participation, and the Agreement will terminate on that date unless the Parties select another Administrator before that date. No jointly -owned property will be obtained under this Agreement, and any Party's real or personal property held by the Startup 425 program will be returned to that Party upon the Party's withdrawal or this Agreement's termination. 7. FINANCING. The cities of Bellevue, Issaquah, Redmond and Renton will each provide $15,000 annually for 2019 and 2020 to fund Startup 425 management and day-to-day operations. The first payment will be due 30 days after the Effective Date. Subsequent payments will be due by January 31 of each successive term. A deferred account will be established at the Administrator for funds received for Startup 425. The Administrator will contribute up to $40,000, to manage the Startup 425 program and its day-to-day operations, and provide accommodations including but not limited to office space, meeting space, and necessary equipment for its operation. 8. CONTACT PERSON For purposes of this Agreement, the following persons shall serve as contact persons for their respective jurisdictions: Bellevue: 5 RESOLUTION NO. AGENDA ITEM # 9. c) Issaquah: Kirkland: Redmond: Renton: 9. GENERAL MATTERS AND RECORDING. A. Entire Agreement. This Agreement is the complete expression of the terms hereof, and any representations or understandings, whether written or oral, not incorporated herein are excluded. B. Modification. This Agreement may only be modified in writing and must be signed by all Parties participating in Startup 425 at the time of the modification. C. No Assignment. No Party shall have the right to transfer or assign its rights or obligations under this Agreement without the prior written consent of all other Parties. D. Venue. Any action filed under or related to this Agreement must be brought in King County Superior Court. E. Recording. This Agreement shall be filed with King County Records by the City of Kirkland or otherwise made public in accordance with the Interlocal Cooperation Act. F. Dispute Resolution. If any dispute arises among the Parties which is not resolved by routine meetings or communications, the disputing parties agree to seek resolution of such dispute in good faith by meeting, as soon as feasible. If the disputing parties do not come to an agreement on the dispute, they may agree to pursue mediation through a process to be mutually agreed upon, with the parties to the dispute sharing equally the costs of mediation and assuming their own costs. G. No Third Party Beneficiaries. This Agreement is for the benefit of the Parties only, and no third party shall have any rights hereunder. H. Retained Responsibility and Authority. Except as expressly provided for herein, the Parties retain the responsibility and authority for managing and maintaining their own respective systems and programs related to economic development activities. Severability. The invalidity of any clause, sentence, paragraph, section, or portion thereof shall not affect the validity of the remaining provisions of the Agreement In the event the provision invalidated is necessary for any Party to continue to receive the benefit it was receiving under the Agreement before the invalidation, the Parties agree to amend the Agreement to provide a substitute provision that enables it or them to continue to receive that benefit. If that cannot be done, the Agreement will be deemed terminated as of any date required by the invalidation. 10. COUNTERPARTS. This Agreement may be signed in counterparts and, if so signed, shall be deemed one integrated agreement. 0 RESOLUTION NO. AGENDA ITEM # 9. c) Approved and executed of the dates indicated below. By: Name: Title: Date Signed: Attested to by: City Clerk Approved as to form: City Attorney By: Name: Title: Date Signed: Attested to by: City Clerk Approved as to form: City Attorney By: Name: Title: Date Signed: Jurisdiction: Bellevue Jurisdiction: Issaquah Jurisdiction: Kirkland 7 RESOLUTION NO. AGENDA ITEM # 9. c) Attested to by: City Clerk Approved as to form: City Attorney By: Name: Title: Date Signed: Attested to by: City Clerk Approved as to form: City Attorney By: Name: Title: Date Signed: Attested to by: City Clerk Approved as to form: City Attorney Jurisdiction: Redmond Jurisdiction: Renton 0 AGENDA ITEM # 9. e) CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON ORDINANCE NO. AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON, ANNEXING CERTAIN TERRITORY TO THE CITY OF RENTON (WOLF WOODS ANNEXATION; FILE NO. A-17-002). WHEREAS, under the provisions of RCW 35A.14.120, as amended, a written annexation petition was presented and filed with the City Clerk on or about July 24, 2017; and WHEREAS, prior to the filing and circulation of the petition for annexation to the City of Renton, pursuant to RCW 35A.14.120, the petitioning parties, comprised of property owners of not less than ten percent (10%) in value, according to the assessed valuation for general taxation of the area to be annexed, notified the City Council of their intention to commence the direct petition for annexation proceedings; and WHEREAS, after a public meeting, it was determined that the petitioning owners agreed to accept that portion of the City's Comprehensive Plan as it pertains to the territory including the applicable zoning regulation relating thereto; and WHEREAS, the King County Department of Assessments examined and verified the signatures on the petition for annexation on or about April 5, 2018, and determined that the signatures represent at least sixty percent (60%) of the assessed value (excluding streets) of the area to be annexed, as required by RCW 35A.14.120; and WHEREAS, the Department of Community and Economic Development of the City of Renton considered and recommended that the City of Renton annex the properties; and 1 AGENDA ITEM # 9. e) WHEREAS, consistent with RCW 35A.14.130, the City Council set June 24, 2018, in the City Council Chambers, City Hall, as the time and place for a public hearing on the petition with notice as required by law; and WHEREAS, pursuant to notice, the public hearing was held at the time and place specified, and the City Council considered all matters in connection with the petition and determined that all legal requirements and procedures applicable to the RCW 35A.14.120 petition method for annexation have been met; and WHEREAS, a "Notice of Intention," including all required information for review of the annexation, was transmitted to the King County Boundary Review Board and approved as of October 29, 2018; NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON, DO ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS: SECTION I. All requirements of the law in regard to the annexation by petition method, including the provisions of RCW 35A.14.120, 130, 140, and 150 have been met. It is further determined that the petition for annexation to the City of Renton of the property and territory described below is hereby approved and granted; the following described property being contiguous to the city limits of the City of Renton is hereby annexed to the City of Renton, and such annexation to be effective on and after the approval, passage, and thirty (30) days after publication of this ordinance; and on and after said date the property shall constitute a part of the City of Renton and shall be subject to all its laws and ordinances then and thereafter in force and effect; the property being described as follows: Pa AGENDA ITEM # 9. e) ,.:. ►e►.ra►ral See Exhibit "A" attached hereto and made a part hereof as if fully set forth herein [The proposed 8-acre Wolf Woods Annexation is located at the northeastern portion of the City limits. It is bordered by Northeast 20t" to the north, Nile Avenue Northeast to the east, a parcel line in proximity of Northeast 18t" St (if extended), and a parcel line near Ilwaco Avenue Northeast to the west. The boundaries to the north, south, and west are coterminous with existing City limits.] and the owners of the property within the annexation shall be subject to the City's Comprehensive Plan and Zoning Code. SECTION II. This ordinance shall be effective upon its passage, approval, and thirty (30) days after publication of a summary of this ordinance in the City's official newspaper. The summary shall consist of this ordinance's title. A certified copy of this ordinance shall be filed with the King County Council, State of Washington, and as otherwise provided by law. PASSED BY THE CITY COUNCIL this day of 12019. Jason Seth, City Clerk APPROVED BY THE MAYOR this day of 12019. Denis Law, Mayor 3 AGENDA ITEM # 9. e) C9:I ►e►Oraffie1 Approved as to form: Shane Moloney, City Attorney Date of Publication: ORD:2054:1/2/19:scr AGENDA ITEM # 9. e) ,.:. ►e►.ra►ra EXHIBIT "A" Wolf Woods Annexation Lots 1, 2, 3, and 4 of King County Short Plat Number S91S0034, Recorded under Auditor's file number 199711209002, King County Records, King County Washington. Together with Lots A and B of King County Boundary Line Adjustment Number LOSL0038, Recorded under Auditors file number 20080826900005, King County Records, King County Washington. Containing 354,765 square feet [8.114 acres] more or less. 5 Wolf Woods Annexation Exhibit 1. Vicinity Annexation Boundary Pa reels Cray Limits 6 ]75 156 AGENDA ITEM # 9. 0 CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON ORDINANCE NO. AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON, ESTABLISHING THE ZONING CLASSIFICATION OF CERTAIN PROPERTY ANNEXED WITHIN THE CITY OF RENTON FROM R-4 (URBAN RESIDENTIAL 4 DWELLING UNITS PER ACRE, KING COUNTY ZONING) TO R-4 (RESIDENTIAL 4 DU/AC; FOUR DWELLING UNITS PER ACRE, CITY OF RENTON ZONING) (WOLF WOODS ANNEXATION, FILE NO. A-17- 002). WHEREAS, under Section 4-2-020 of Chapter 2, Zoning Districts — Uses and Standards, of Title IV (Development Regulations) of the Renton Municipal Code, as amended, and the maps and reports adopted in conjunction therewith, the property hereinbelow described has not been zoned in the City of Renton; and WHEREAS, property owners petitioned the City of Renton for annexation and concurrent rezoning, which annexation having previously been approved and ordinance adopted which will annex the property to the City of Renton, and the City having held two public hearings in the matter of zoning, the first hearing being held on June 24, 2018, and the second hearing being held on January 14, 2019, and the zoning being in conformity with the City's Comprehensive Plan, as amended, and the City Council duly considered all matters relevant thereto, and all parties were heard appearing in support or in opposition; NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON, DO ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS: SECTION I. The following described property in the City of Renton is hereby zoned to R-4. The annual ordinance adopting the maps of the City's zoning ordinance is hereby amended to evidence the rezoning and the Administrator of the Community and Economic Development 1 AGENDA ITEM # 9. 0 ORDINANCE NO. Department is hereby authorized and directed to change the maps of the zoning ordinance, as amended, to evidence the rezoning, to wit: See Exhibit "A" attached hereto and made a part hereof as if fully set forth herein. [The property is located at the northeastern portion of the City limits. It is bordered by Northeast 20t" to the north, Nile Avenue Northeast to the east, a parcel line in proximity of Northeast 18t" St (if extended), and a parcel line near Ilwaco Avenue Northeast to the west. The boundaries to the north, south, and west are coterminous with existing City limits.] SECTION II. This ordinance shall be effective upon its passage, approval, and thirty (30) days after publication of a summary of this ordinance in the City's official newspaper. The summary shall consist of this ordinance's title. PASSED BY THE CITY COUNCIL this day of 12019. APPROVED BY THE MAYOR this Approved as to form: Shane Moloney, City Attorney Date of Publication: ORD:2055:1/3/19:scr Jason Seth, City Clerk day of , 2019. Denis Law, Mayor 2 ORDINANCE NO. AGENDA ITEM # 9. 0 EXHIBIT "A" Wolf Woods Zoning Lots 1, 2, 3, and 4 of King County Short Plat Number S91S0034, Recorded under Auditor's file number 199711209002, King County Records, King County Washington. Together with Lots A and B of King County Boundary Line Adjustment Number 1-081-0038, Recorded under Auditor's file number 2008C826900005, King County Records, King County Washington. Containing 354,765 square feet (8.114 acres) more or less. 3 Wolf Woods Annexation Area Exhibit A Renton Zoning Annexation Boundary Parcels City Limns Proposed Ioning - Rem—ti-1 _ A na 1 d er c r