The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About20090914_DQInspector's Daily Report Project Name Date Shift Sheet 1 of 3 day Weather AM PM Inspector IDR Report # No. No. 11 1 Foreman with CDB 8 43 21 51 4 Laborer with Terra Dynamics 2 2 1 650J John Deere Dozer 1 2 1 1 1 1 1 Photos/Videos taken today?x Yes No File: Inspector's Shift Hours From: To:Inspector's Signature Reviewed By Laborer with CTI September 14, 2009 September 14, 2009 Daniel Quehl 7:00 PM Acceptable Date 6:00 AM Date EX 450 Hitachi excavators Location Structure#/Station 1 ton trailer Bid Items Inspected Today/Field Note Flaggers cloudy , hi 71 low 67 Daniel Quehl 20090914 DQ Operators with CDB Foreman with Terra DynamicsLaborers wih CDB Flaggers General Foreman with CDB Foreman with CTI Operators with CTI 920 Cat bucket loader 350P John Deere offroad dump trucks Operators with Terra Dynamics D6 Cat dozer Dynapac 16 ton vibratory roller IDR Sheet Item Number Material / Item Description Major Equipment on Project CDB Number & Classification EX 270LC Hitachi excavator PC45 Komatsu small excavator 312C Cat excavator Subcontractor Number & Classification Plan SheetItem Quanity I-405/I-5 to SR169 Stage 2 - Widening and SR515 Interchange Project cloudy , hi 67 low 62 Traffic Control ReviewedSigns Barricades Inspector's Daily Report Project Number Sheet 2 of 3 Inspector IDR Report # IDR Sheet Daniel Quehl I-405/I-5 to SR169 Stage 2 - Widening and SR515 Interchange Project Inspector's Notes September 14, 2009 Date 20090914 DQ Today' s activities listed for CDB at the Defoor site: Attended the CDB morning meeting at 6:30am. Performed observation and soil density testing at the following locations on common borrow: Over SF-55 , Miragrid 3XT, and SF-20 Geogrid reinforcing from stations 11+50 to 15+95,fill along the 2:1 slope from stations 10+00 to 11+00, and Geogrid bench from stations 10+35 to 11+50. Performed soil density testing at above locations per T310 and SOP 615 (Method 1) using a Troxler nuclear density gauge model 3440. The moisture density relationship value of 117.0 with a 12.1% optimum moisture was used per Mayes Testing lab number T-09082-24. The tests meet the 95% required compaction. The contractor was informed of test results. See attached Field Density Report and Density Work Sheet for results and locations. The conveyor belt transported a total 4,730 cubic yards of common borrow today to the site from a total of 215 truck loads. While the Geogrid Reinforcing was being installed from stations 11+50 to 15+95 the following was verified: 1. Checked to assure that the proper type of Geogrid reinforcing was being used and was not damaged. 2. Checked to assure the minimum embedment depth was attained according to approved plans&specs 3. Checked that Geogrid was attached together, with the subcontractor using twist ties placed at a 1' to 2' spacing and overlapping the Geogrid 2 to 6 inches. 4. A total of 11 rolls of SF-55, 3 rolls of SF-20, and 28 rolls of Miragrid 3XT were placed today. 5. That fill being placed did not exceed 1'. The subcontractor is using a laser to check elevations on each lift. 6. That the Geogrid was laying flat and not bundled up prior to fill being placed. 7. The unused Geogrid was covered with black plastic to protect from the sun. The CTI subcontractor placed a total of 2 lifts of fill over the Geogrid Reinforcing from a total of 121 truck loads for a total of 3,025 cubic yards completing elevations 191 and 192. Performed observation as Trail King side dumpers transported a total of 380 cubic yards of Type 2 compost being placed along the 2:1 slope between the ditchline and Geogrid reinforcing from stations 10+00 to 15+95. Visited by Rod Blalock inspector with WSDOT, Chad Webley Field Eng. with CDB, and Alex Zimmerman with CSI Geosynthetics to see the progress of the project. The Holding Point was reached at elevation 191 for the Geogrid reinforcing. Rod Blalock the inspector with WSDOT and myself spoke with Kevin Wicklund that all testing had been obtained and that is was alright to continue. Observed the 350P offroad dump trucks driving over the compacted areas throughout the day with appearing to have no deflection or yielding. Today's activities listed for CDB at the Benson Bulb Out: Performed observation and soil denstiy testing on 1 1/4 CSBC being placed southwest of the Benson Bridge. Performed soil density testing at above location per T310 and SOP 615 (Method 1) using a Troxler nuclear density gauge model 3440. The moisture density relationship value of 142.9 with a 9.7% optimum moisture was used per Mayes Testing lab number T-09082-3. The tests meet the 95% required compaction. The contractor was informed of test results. See attached Field Density Report and Density Work Sheet for results and locations. Inspector's Daily Report Project Number Sheet 3 of 3 Inspector IDR Report # Inspector's Notes I-405/I-5 to SR169 Stage 2 - Widening and SR515 Interchange Project September 14, 2009 Daniel Quehl IDR Sheet Date 20090914 DQ Personal used on the Defoor site: 1. Dan Lonsdale-General Foreman with CDB 2. Kevin Wicklund-Foreman with CTI 3.Mark Klinkhammer-Operator with CTI 4.Rich Park -Operator with CTI 5.Mark Furnier-Operator with CTI 6.Jay Knudtsen-Operator with CTI 7.Leo Dunn-Laborer /Operator with CTI 8. Robert Gamble-Operator with CTI 9.Mike Forest-Laborer with CTI 10.Stoney Kuck-Operator with CDB 11. Bill Smith-Operator/Laborer with CTI 12. Robert Morales-Foreman with Terra Dynamics 13. Herman Garrido-Laborer with Terra Dynamics 14. Nate Lane-Laborer with Terra Dynamics 15. Antonio Martinez-Operator with Terra Dynamics 16.Manuel Garrido-Laborer with Terra Dynamics 17. Jim Davis-Laborer with CDB 18. Reginaldo Morales-Laborer with Terra Dynamics 19. Allan Osborn-Operator with CDB 20. Three Flaggers Equipment used on the Defoor site: 1.Two 350P John Deere offroad dump trucks 2.Two EX450 Hitachi excavators 3. EX270LC Hitachi excavator 4. Two D6 Cat dozers 5.Dynapac 16 ton vibratory roller 6.650J John Deere dozer 7.water truck 8. PC45 Komatsu small excavator 9. 920 Cat bucket loader 10. 312C Cat excavator 11. 1 ton trailer Personal present at the Benson Bulb Out: 1.Foreman with CDB 2.Four operators with CDB 3.Three laborers with CDB 4. Two flaggers Equipment used at the Benson Bulb Out: 1.D9N Cat Dozer 2.EX300 Hitachi Excavator 3.EX120 Hitachi Excavator 4. CS 683E Vibratory Roller 5.D6H LGP Cat Dozer 6.HM 300-2 Komatsu offroad Dump Truck 7.385 CL Cat Excavator Project #:Date: 9/14/2009 Project :20 Inspector: Test Method: WSDOT FOP for AASHTO T310 123 11+50 to 15+95 10+35 to 11+50 11+50 to 15+95 T-09082-24 T-09082-24 T-09082-24 13+25 11+00 15+50 N/A N/A N/A Common Common Common -42 Top of Bench -45 0 degrees 116.7 112.9 113.7 90 degrees 116.3 113.0 111.4 average 116.5 113.0 112.6 0 degrees 10.0 9.1 9.5 90 degrees 10.3 9.3 10.6 average 10.2 9.2 10.1 9.56 10.13 11.08 0.00 0.00 0.00 9.56 10.13 11.08 0.26 0.07 0.44 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.26 0.07 0.44 314 97.24 99.28 96.05 117.0 117.0 117.0 99.6 96.5 96.2 12.1 12.1 12.1 12.1 12.1 12.1 12.1 12.1 12.1 Test Hole Number Soils Field Density Worksheet for WSDOT Projects (WSDOT SOP 615) Moisture Density Curve # Test Station Station to Station Worksheet used when Maximum Density is determined using WSDOT Method T99 Reviewed By: Comments: Daniel Quehl WSDOT I405,I5 to SR169 MTE Nuclear Gauge #: Average Moisture Content Reference to Centerline Moisture Content Average Dry Density lb/cu.ft. Gauge Readings Material Type Depth of Material Dry Density lbs/cu.ft. Optimum Moisture Content Corrected = ((6 x 7) + (5 x 8)) / 100 (6) % Passing #4 Sieve = (100 - % Retained) Density and Optimum Moisture Determination WSDOT T99 Percent Compaction (% of maximum) = (Dry Density / Corrected Maximum Density) x 100 Maximum Density (from Maximum Density Curve Table) (1) Mass of Sample (Dry or SSD) + Tare (2) Mass of Tare A T-09082 (7) Optimum Moisture of Fine Material, passing #4 (from Maximum Density Curve Report) (8) Optimum Moisture of Coarse Material, retained #4 (from Maximum Density Curve Report) (5) % Retained on #4 Sieve (% Oversize) = Mass Retained / Mass of Sample Mass of Sample (Dry or SSD) = (1) - (2) (3) Mass of Retained on #4 Sieve + Tare (4) Mass of Tare B Mass of Material Retained on #4 Sieve = (3) - (4) Gradation Determination Project #:Date: 9/14/2009 Project :20 Inspector: Test Method: WSDOT FOP for AASHTO T310 123 28+00 to 34+06 28+00 to 34+06 T-09082-3 T-09082-3 31+90 30+65 N/A N/A 1 1/4 CSBC 1 1/4 CSBC Top of CSBC Top of CSBC 0 degrees 136.1 137.5 90 degrees 137.1 135.7 average 136.6 136.6 #VALUE! 0 degrees 7.1 7.5 90 degrees 7.4 7.3 average 7.3 7.4 #VALUE! 13.188 13.41 00 13.188 13.41 #VALUE! 9.6 8.06 00 9.6 8.06 #VALUE! 73 60 #VALUE! 27 40 #VALUE! 142.9 142.9 96 96 #VALUE! 9.7 9.7 9.7 9.7 9.7 9.7 #VALUE! (5) % Retained on #4 Sieve (% Oversize) = Mass Retained / Mass of Sample Mass of Sample (Dry or SSD) = (1) - (2) (3) Mass of Retained on #4 Sieve + Tare (4) Mass of Tare B Mass of Material Retained on #4 Sieve = (3) - (4) (1) Mass of Sample (Dry or SSD) + Tare (2) Mass of Tare A T-09082 Gradation Determination Optimum Moisture Content Corrected = ((6 x 7) + (5 x 8)) / 100 (6) % Passing #4 Sieve = (100 - % Retained) Density and Optimum Moisture Determination WSDOT T606 Percent Compaction (% of maximum) = (Dry Density / Corrected Maximum Density) x 100 Maximum Density (from Maximum Density Curve Table) (7) Optimum Moisture of Fine Material, passing #4 (from Maximum Density Curve Report) (8) Optimum Moisture of Coarse Material, retained #4 (from Maximum Density Curve Report) Average Moisture Content Reference to Centerline Moisture Content Average Dry Density lb/cu.ft. Gauge Readings Material Type Depth of Material Dry Density lbs/cu.ft. Test Hole Number Soils Field Density Worksheet for WSDOT Projects (WSDOT SOP 615) Moisture Density Curve # Test Station Station to Station Worksheet used when Maximum Density is determined using WSDOT Method T606 Daniel Quehl WSDOT I405,I5 to SR169 MTE Nuclear Gauge #: Reviewed By: Comments: Page of96*98147.8145.69.7142.9142.9 7.3Depth or Elevation (feet)Direct TransmissionCompaction %FieldMoisture Content %Dry Density (PCF)Backscatter / Direct TransmissionLaboratoryMax Dry Density (PCF)*Top of CSBCAverage135.720Tan silty sand with trace of oversizeDirect TransmissionMTE Nuclear Gauge No.:Wet Density (PCF)Average7.5ASTM D 6938Test #55aTop of CSBCLocationIn our opinion, fill generally meets specifications as indicated by test numbers:Soil Type DescriptionTan silty sand with trace of oversizeTan silty sand with trace of oversizeTan silty sand with trace of oversizeContractor AdvisedFull-time observationMethod of Adding Moisture:fire hose and water truck1 footComments: *See Attached Density Work Sheets for test #'s 1 thru 5Type and Number of Compaction units:Number of Passes:16 ton vibe roller3to4Part-time observationDry Density: 7.3QC Sample:Test No.:Fill at the Benson Bulb Out 10' west of Benson road at station 30+65Fill at the Benson Bulb Out 10' west of Benson road at station 30+65Project No.:Type and Number of earth moving units:Dozer ASTM D 698 (Standard Proctor)ASTM D 1557 (Modified Proctor)Specification Compaction and Material :95%-T60622Date: 9/14/009T09082WSDOT I405,I5 to SR169Daniel QuehlMoisture %:SoilFIELD DENSITY TEST REPORT5a 135.7In our opinion, fill does not meet specifications as indicated by test numbers:Fill test meets compaction specificationsProject:Inspector:137.5OMC %9.720225 Cedar Valley Road, Suite 110 Ph 425.742.9360 Lynnwood, WA 98036 Fax 425.745.1737 10029 S. Tacoma Way, Suite E-2 Ph 253.584.3720 Tacoma, WA 98499 Fax 253.584.3707 7911 NE 33rd Drive, Suite 190 Ph 503.281.7515 Portland, OR 97211 Fax 503.281.7579 MTE 1400-2C, Rev 2, 4/1/08