HomeMy WebLinkAbout20090915_DQInspectors Daily Deport
IDR Sheet
Project Name 'Date
Shift
1-40511-5 to SR 169 Stage 2 - Widening
Sheet 1 of
and SR515 Interchange Project September 15, 2009
day
Weather
_
AM cloudy, hi 71 tow 60 PM sunny, hi 78 low 71
Inspector IDR Report
Daniel Qrrehl 20090915 DQ
Woftblsl
"tit" A 00tswitation
`, o.n
oxttrautcr;i�i bei lassifi atican
1
General Foreman with CDB —�
1
Foreman with GTI
— --
2
Surveyors with CDB
------- ---
6
Operators with GTI
- 3
Laborer with GT!
- -
-- 1
Foreman with Terra Dynamics
4
LLaborers with Terra Dynamics
e*
ql inr
rtt or► Project
2
EX 450 Hitachi excavators
D6 Gat dozer
1
1650) ,Icahn Deere Dozer
J
1
Dynafaac 16 ton vibratory roller
2
3500 Jahn Deere offroad dump tracks
--
1
EX 27OLC Hitachi excavator (idle toda}s)
�
--
1 I
torr trailer
-
— --
....
— -
- - -- — _.---
—
Bid 11proictec + do 11=ielri Note,
to Nurtt r M� taria(l rrt Aescri tit rt lw dors t uct r / tation Iters Quanity
I
� Ptan Sholif
Trak Control
Signs n Barricades flaogers, Reviewed
� Acceptable
Photos/Videos taken today? x yes No Pile:
i
Inspector's Shift Hours Daniel Quehl
From: 6:00 AM
September 15, 2009
To: 7:00 P 1--,"Inspector's nature
Date
jrl n
Review d I3
Gate
F#04�4
1-40511-5 to SR169 Stage 2 - Widening
Sheet 2 of 3 and SR515 Interchange Project
Inspector IDR Report
Daniel Quehl 20090915 DQ
Today's activities listed for CDB at the Defoor site:
September 15, 2009
Performed observation and soil density testing on fill using common borrow over SF -55, Miragird 3XT, and SF -20
Geogrid reinforcing from stations 10+75 to 15+95.
Performed soil density testing at above locations per T3 10 and SOP 615 (Method 1) using a Troxler nuclear
density gauge model 3440. The moisture density relationship value of 11 T 0 pcf with a 12. 1 % optimum moisture
was used per Mayes Testing lab number T-09082-24. The tests meet the 95% required compaction. The
contractor was informed of test results. See attached Field Density Report and Density Work Sheet for results
and locations.
The conveyor belt transported a total 3,740 cubic yards of common borrow today to the site from a total of 170
truck loads.
111011 IR 1 11 ST i HIN III! zzmm��
1. Checked to assure that the proper type of Geogrid reinforcing was being used and was not damaged.
2. Checked to assure the minimum embedment depth was attained according to approved plans&specs
3. Checked that Geogrid was attached together, with the subcontractor using twist ties placed at a Vto 2spaci . ng
and overlapping the Geogrid 2 to 6 inches,
4 A total of 14 rolls of SF -55, 6 112 rolls of SF -20, and 31 rolls of Miragrid 3XT were placed today,
5. That fill being placed did not exceed 1'. The subcontractor is using a laser to check elevations on each lift.
6 That the Geogrid was laying flat and not bundled up priorto fill being placed.
T The unused Geogrid was covered with black plastic to protect from the sun,
The CTI subcontractor placed a total of 2 lifts of fill over the Geogrid Reinforcing from a total of 168 truck loads
for a total of 4,200 cubic yards completing elevations 193,194, and 195. The Secondary Geogrid reinforcing was
placed and inspected at elevation 192 and the Primary Geogrid reinforcing at elevation 195 will be placed and
inspected tomorrow,
Was visited by Dan Lonsdale with CDB, Dave Zimmerman with CDB,Robert Patcheck with CDB,and Chad
Webley Field Eng. with CDB being informed that there Can be no vibration from the Dynapac 16 ton roller for
compaction. The compaction the rest of the day was obtained by static rolling of the Dynapac 16 ton roller and by
the fully loaded 350P offroad dump trucks driving over compacted areas. The material appeared to have no
deflection or yielding throughout the day.
The subcontractor with Terra Dynamics placed waddle along the 2:1 slopelditchline west of Geogrid reinforcing
bench between stations 10+00 to 15+95.
IDR Sheet Project Number Date
1-40511-5 to SRI 69 Stage 2 - Widening
Sheet 3 of 3 and SR515 interchange Project September 15, 2009
Inspector IDR Report?
Daniel Quehl 20090915 DQ
_____1mekecto!Ls Notes
Personal used on the Defoor site:
1, Dan Lonsdale -General Foreman with CDB
2. Kevin Wicklund-Foreman with CTI
3.Mark Klinkhammer-Operator with CTI
4.Will Fletland -Operator with CTI
5.Mark Furnier-Operator with CTI
6.Jay Knudtsen-Operator with CTI
7.Leo Dunn -Laborer /Operator with CTI
8. Robert Gamble -Operator with CTI
9.Mike o, •. with CTI
1 O.Stoney Kuck -Operator with CDB
11. Bill Smith-Operator/Laborer with CTI
12. Robert Morales -Foreman with Terra Dynamics
13. Herman Garrido -Laborer with Terra Dynamics
14. Nate Lane -Laborer with Terra Dynamics
15. Antonio Martinez -Laborer with Terra Dynamics
16.Manuel Garrido -Laborer with Terra Dynamics
17. Jim Davis -Laborer with CDB
19. Rich Park -Operator with CTI
20. Josh Taylor -Surveyor with CDB
21 . Eric Johnson -Surveyor with CDB
: Equipment used on the Defoor site:
1.Two 350P John Deere offroad dump trucks
2.Two EX450 Hitachi excavators
3. EX270LC Hitachi excavator
4. D6 Cat dozer
5.Dynapac 16 ton vibratory roller
6.650J John Deere dozer
7.water truck
& 1 ton trailer
T' Ti ENGINEERS, INC
- -,,F "
20225 Cedar Valley Road, Suite 110 Ph 425,7419360
Lynnwood, WA 98036 Fax 425.745,1737
10029 S. Tacoma Way, Suite E-2 Ph 253,584.3720
Tacoma, WA 98499 Fax 253,584.3707
7911 NE 33"" Drive, Suite 190 Ph 501281 .7515
Portland, OR 97211 Fax 503.281.7579
Soil
FIELD DENSITY TEST REPORT
ASTM D 6938
Page 1 of 2
Project No.: T09082 Date: 9/15/009
Project: WSDOT 1405,15 to SR169
Inspector: Daniel Quehl
MT E Nuclear Gauge No.: 20
i -in over ueogrid Heintorcing at Detoor site
-40'below
Direct
117 121
126A 1119 10.7
Tan silty sand with trace of
75' east of ditchline at station 13+55
Transmission
oversize
1 a
Fill over Geogrid Reinforcing at Defoor site
-40'below
Direct
117 12A
126.8 115�9 9A
Tan silty sand with traceof
7' east of ditchline at station 13+55
Transmission
oversize
Average 98
Tan silty sand withtraceoversize
2
Fill over Geogrid Reinforcing at Defoor site
73- 75 e —Io w
—Direct
Tan silty sand w-`Uth_trace _o ?__J1
40' east of ditchline at station 14+60
±UjaL2ELe
Transmission
117 12A
123.5 112.3 10
oversize
2a
Fill over Geogrid Reinforcing at Defoor site
-43'below
Direct
117 12A
121.9 111.3 9.6
Tan silty sand with —trace of
40' east of ditchline at station 14+60
Transmission
oversize
Average 96
Tan silty sand with trace of
oversize
3
Fill over Geogrid Reinforcing at Defoor site
7T7Io
9b e — w
—
Direct
— —
117 121
— — — _*
1224 1118 95
Tan silty sand with trace of
140' east of ditchline at station 12+00
Transmission
..,.
oversize
3a
Fill over Geogrid Reinforcing at Defoor site
-39'below
Direct
—
117 12.1
— --- — — *
124A 112.4 10.7
Tan silty sand with trace of
140'east of ditchline at station 12+00
Transmission
oversize
Average 96
Tan silty sand with trace of
oversize
4
Fill over Geogrid Reinforcing at Defoor site
4Zbelow
Direct
—
Tan silty sand with trace
60' east of ditchline at station 14+50
finish
finish rde
15475
Transmission-
117 12A
125 113.6 10
�0
oversize
4a
-FiTo-v-er7e-o-g-rj-d-Rein -For-ci-ng-a-t—De-fo-or site
ow
ow
Direct
117 12.1
124.5 113.4 9�8
Tan silty sand with trace 7
—
60' east of ditchline at station 14+50
finishgrde
Transmission
oversize
Specification Compaction and Material : 95%-T99
E-/]
In our opinion, fill generally meets specifications as indicated by test
numbers:
El ASTM D 1557 (Modified Proctor) —
El ASTM D 698 (Standard Proctor)
El
in our opinion, fill does not meet specifications as indicated by test numbers:
Type and Number of earth moving units: Dozer and Excavator
Type and Number of Compaction units: 16 ton vibe roller
❑
Fill test meets compaction specifications
Contractor Advised
Number of Passes: 3to4
1 foot
❑
Full-time observation
❑ Part-time observation
Method of Adding Moisture: fire hose and water truck
QC Sample: Test No.:
3a_ Dry Density: 112.4
Moisture %: 10.7
Comments: *See Attached Density Work Sheets for test #'s 1 thru 5
MTE 1400-2C, Rev 2, 411108
Specification Compaction and Material : 95%-T99
El ASTM ID 1557 (Modified Proctor)
0 ASTIVI D 698 (Standard Proctor)
Type and Number of earth moving units: Dozer and Excavator
Type and Number of Compaction units: 16 ton vibe roller
21 In our opinion, fill generally meets specifications as indicated by test numbers:
D In our opinion, fill does not meet specifications as indicated by test numbers:
Fill test meets compaction specifications
Contractor Advised
Number of Passes: -3to4 - 1 foot 0/Full-time observation El Part-time observation
Method of Adding Moisture: fire hose and water truck QC Sample: Test No.: 5a Dry Density: 114.3 Moisture %: 10.2
Comments: *See Attached Density Work Sheets for test Ws 1 thru 5
MTE 1400-2C, Rev 2, 411108
Page 2 of 2
7' 'T/ ENGINEERS , INC
-
20225 Cedar Valley Road, Suite 110 Ph 425.742.9360
Project No.:
T09082
Date: 9/15/009
Lynnwood, WA 98036 Fax 425.745.1737
Soil
10029 S. Tacoma Way, Suite E-2 Ph 253.584,3720
Project:
WSDOT
1405,15 to SR169
-
Tacoma, WA 98499 Fax 253,584.3707
FIELD DENSITY TEST REPORT
Inspector: Daniel Quehl
7911 NE 33"' Drive, Suite 190 Ph 503,281.7515
ASTM D 6938
Portland, OR 97211 Fax 501281.7579
MT E Nuclear Gauge No.:
20
D00'rh 9�
Rai�,kicatter I
LabOratory
Field,
Test# Location
leetiet
lrsct
MAX
Wet,I)e6sity'Dry Density Moisture
C ornpaction
Soil, Type Descron,
ffeet),-,,
Trpinsmission
ty 0
0001 MC %
(P&)
(PCF) Content %
%
(PC F)
Average
97
Tan silty sand with trace of
Fill over Geogrid reinforcing at Defoor site
5
:3_6below
-Direct
117 12A
123,6
112.8 9.6
oversize -
Tan silty sand with trace of
150' east of ditchline at station 11 +55
-rill
Transmission
oversize
over Geogrid reinforcing at Defoor site
5a
-36below
Direct
117 12A
125.9
114,3 10.2
Tan silty sand with trace of
150' east of ditchline at station 11x-55
Transmission
oversize
Average
97
Tan silty sand with trace of
oversize
Specification Compaction and Material : 95%-T99
El ASTM ID 1557 (Modified Proctor)
0 ASTIVI D 698 (Standard Proctor)
Type and Number of earth moving units: Dozer and Excavator
Type and Number of Compaction units: 16 ton vibe roller
21 In our opinion, fill generally meets specifications as indicated by test numbers:
D In our opinion, fill does not meet specifications as indicated by test numbers:
Fill test meets compaction specifications
Contractor Advised
Number of Passes: -3to4 - 1 foot 0/Full-time observation El Part-time observation
Method of Adding Moisture: fire hose and water truck QC Sample: Test No.: 5a Dry Density: 114.3 Moisture %: 10.2
Comments: *See Attached Density Work Sheets for test Ws 1 thru 5
MTE 1400-2C, Rev 2, 411108
MAYESTESTING ENGINEERS, INC.
Soils Fief Density Worksheet for WSDOT Projects (SDOT SCEP 615)
Project #: T-09082 Gate: 9115120109
Project: t1 SDOT 14015,15 to SR169 IVITE Nuclear Gauge 1#: 2
Inspector: Daniel Quehl TestMethod: WSDOT FOP for AASHTO T310
Worksheet use n Maximnrn npnqitv k ripfprminpri i inn ,,n( -1T Rfiafh^r1 Tats
Test Hole Number
0 degrees
2
112.3
Station to Stations
10+75 to 1+9
10+75 to 15+9
10+75 to 15+95
Moisture Density Curve #
T-09082-24
T-09082-24
T-09032-24
Test Station
13+55
14+60
12+00
Reference to Centerline
N/A
1A
/A
Material Type
Common
Common
Common
Depth of Material
-40
-43
-39
Dry Density lbstcu.ft.
0 degrees
113.9
112.3
111.8
0.00
00 degrees
115,9
111.3
112.4
Average Dry Density lbtou.ft.
average
114.9
111.8
112.1
Moisture Content
0 degrees
103.7
10.0
9.
00 degrees
9.4
9.6
10.7
,Average Moisture Content
average
10.1
9.8
10,1
Gradation Determination
013 Mass of Sample (Dry or SSD) + Tare 10.81
12.17
12.66
(2) Mass of Tare A 03.00
0.00
0.00
Mass of Sample (Dry or SSD) = (1) - (2) 10.81
12.17
12.66
(3) Mass of Retained on #4 Sieve + Tare 1.83
0.48
0,44
(4) Mass of Tare B 0,00
0.00
0.00
Mass of Material Retained on #4 Sieve = (3) - (4) 133
0.48
0,44
(5) % Retained on #4 Sieve (% Oversize) = Mass Retained f plass of Sample 12
4
(6) % Massing #4 Sieve = (100 - % Retained) 87.71
96.08
96.51
Density and Optimum Moisture Determination WSDOT T99
Maximum Density (from Maximum Density Curve Table)
117.0
117.0
117.0
Percent Compaction (% of maximum) = (Dry Density f Corrected Maximums Density) x 100
98.2
95.6
95.8
(7) Optimum Moisture of Fine Material, passing #4 (from Maximum Density Curve Report)
12.1
12.1
12.1
(8) Optimum Moisture of Coarse Material, retained #4 (from Maximum Density Curve Report)
12.1
12.1
12,1
Optimum Moisture Content Corrected = ((6 x 7) + (5 x 8)) # 100
12.1
12.1
12,1
R
Soils Field DensityWorksheet for WSDOT Projects (WSDOT SOP 615)
Project #: T-09082 Date: 9/15/2009
Project: W DOT 1405,15 to SR169 MTE Nuclear Gauge : 20
Inspector: Daniel Guehl TestMethod: WSDOT FOP for AA SHTO T310
Worksheet used when Maximum Densi!lfis determined usingT Method T99
rest Hole Number 1 1 2 3
atation to Station 110-+-7--5---to---15+9510+75 to 15+95
Moisture Density Curve #
T-09032-24
T-09082-24
Test Station
14+50
11+55
113.6
Reference to Centerline
/A
/A
90 degrees
Material Type
Common
Common
Average Dry Density lb/cu.ft.
Depth of Material
-42 1
-36
0.0
Gauge Readings
Dry Density lbs/cu.ft.
0 degrees
113.6
112.8
Optimum
90 degrees
113.4
114.3
Average Dry Density lb/cu.ft.
average
113.5
113.6
0.0
Moisture Content
0 degrees
10.0
9.6
90 degrees
9.8
10.2
Average Moisture Content
averagel
9.9
9.9
0.0
Gradation Determination
(1) Mass of Sample (Dry or SSD) + Tare
10.14
10.32
(2) Mass of Tare A
0.00
0.00
Mass of Sample (Dry or SSD) = (1) - (2)
10.14
10.32
0.00
(3) Mass of Retained on #4 Sieve + Tare
0.44
0.45
(4) Mass of Tare B
0.00
0,00
Mass of Material Retained on #4 Sieve = (3) - (4)
0,44
0.45
0.00
(5) % Retained on #4 Sieve (% Oversize) = Mass Retained 1 Mass of Sample
4
#DIV/OI
(6) % Passing #4 Sieve = (100 - % Retained)
95.66
95.64
#DIVfOI
Density and OptimumMoisture Determination WSDOT T99
Waximum Density (from Maximum Density Curve Table)
Optimum of
Optimum