The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About20090916_DQInspector's Daily Report Project Name Date Shift Sheet 1 of 3 day Weather AM PM Inspector IDR Report # No. No. 11 1 Laborer with CDB 8 13 1 2 2 1 1 650J John Deere Dozer 1 2 1 1 Photos/Videos taken today?x Yes No File: Inspector's Shift Hours From: To:Inspector's Signature Reviewed By Laborer with CTI September 16, 2009 September 16, 2009 Daniel Quehl 7:00 PM (TR 9.17.2009) Acceptable Date 6:00 AM Date EX 450 Hitachi excavators Location Structure#/Station Bid Items Inspected Today/Field Note Flaggers (light rain later in evening) partly cloudy , hi 72 low 64 Daniel Quehl 20090916 DQ Operator with CDB Foreman with Terra Dynamics General Foreman with CDB Foreman with CTI Operators with CTI 350P John Deere offroad dump trucks Operators with Terra Dynamics D6 Cat dozer Dynapac 16 ton vibratory roller IDR Sheet Item Number Material / Item Description Major Equipment on Project CDB Number & Classification EX 270LC Hitachi excavator (idle today) water truck (For dispensing hydroseeding) Subcontractor Number & Classification Plan SheetItem Quanity I-405/I-5 to SR169 Stage 2 - Widening and SR515 Interchange Project partly cloudy , hi 72 low 60 Traffic Control ReviewedSigns Barricades Inspector's Daily Report Project Number Sheet 2 of 3 Inspector IDR Report # IDR Sheet Daniel Quehl I-405/I-5 to SR169 Stage 2 - Widening and SR515 Interchange Project Inspector's Notes September 16, 2009 Date 20090916 DQ Today' s activities listed for CDB at the Defoor site: Attended the weekly CDB safety meeting at 6:30am. Performed observation and soil density testing on fill using common borrow over SF-55 , Miragird 3XT, and SF- 20 Geogrid reinforcing from stations 10+75 to 15+95. Performed soil density testing at above locations per T310 and SOP 615 (Method 1) using a Troxler nuclear density gauge model 3440. The moisture density relationship value of 113.7 with a 13.2% optimum moisture was used per Mayes Testing lab number T-09082-22. The tests meet the 95% required compaction. The contractor was informed of test results. See attached Field Density Report and Density Work Sheet for results and locations. The conveyor belt transported a total 4,906 cubic yards of common borrow today to the site from a total of 223 truck loads. While the Geogrid Reinforcing was being installed from stations 10+75 to 15+95 the following was verified: 1. Checked to assure that the proper type of Geogrid reinforcing was being used and was not damaged. 2. Checked to assure the minimum embedment depth was attained according to approved plans&specs 3. Checked that Geogrid was attached together, with the subcontractor using twist ties placed at a 1' to 2' spacing and overlapping the Geogrid 2 to 6 inches. 4. A total of 14 rolls of SF-55, 3 1/2 rolls of SF-20, and 31 rolls of Miragrid 3XT were placed today. 5. That fill being placed did not exceed 1'. The subcontractor is using a laser to check elevations on each lift. 6. That the Geogrid was laying flat and not bundled up prior to fill being placed. 7. The unused Geogrid was covered with black plastic to protect from the sun. The CTI subcontractor placed a total of 2 lifts of fill over the Geogrid Reinforcing from a total of 178 truck loads for a total of 4,450 cubic yards completing elevations 196,and 197. The Secondary Geogrid reinforcing was placed and inspected at elevation 196 along with the Primary Geogrid reinforcing at elevation 195 as stated in my report yesterday. The Primary Geogrid reinforcing at elevation 197 will be placed and inspected tomorrow. Visited by Rod Blalock inspector with WSDOT throughout the day. The Holding Point was reached at elevation 196 for the Geogrid reinforcing. Rod Blalock and Rick Johnson with WSDOT were both contacted. Spoke with Kevin the Foreman with CTI that it was alright for CTI to continue but Rick Johnson would like to obtain a soil density test at this elevation on the next day. All tests were obtained by Mayes Testing at this elevation today and met denstiy requirments. Terra Dynamics placed Ecofibre hydroseeding along the 2:1 slope between stations 10+00 to 15+95. Spoke with Dave Zimmerman with CDB, Dan Lonsdale with CDB, and Chad Webley the Field Eng. with CDB that it was alright for CTI to vibrate part time using the Dynamic 16 ton roller. Inspector's Daily Report Project Number Sheet 3 of 3 Inspector IDR Report # Inspector's Notes I-405/I-5 to SR169 Stage 2 - Widening and SR515 Interchange Project September 16, 2009 Daniel Quehl IDR Sheet Date 20090916 DQ Personal used on the Defoor site: 1. Dan Lonsdale-General Foreman with CDB 2. Kevin Wicklund-Foreman with CTI 3.Mark Klinkhammer-Operator with CTI 4.Will Fletland -Operator with CTI 5.Mark Furnier-Operator with CTI 6.Jay Knudtsen-Operator with CTI 7.Leo Dunn-Laborer /Operator with CTI 8. Robert Gamble-Operator with CTI 9.Mike Forest-Laborer with CTI 10.Stoney Kuck-Operator with CDB 11. Bill Smith-Operator with CTI 12. Robert Morales-Foreman with Terra Dynamics 13. Herman Garrido-Operator with Terra Dynamics 14. Nate Lane- Operator with Terra Dynamics 15. Jim Davis-Laborer with CDB 16. Felix Villanueva-Laborer with CTI Equipment used on the Defoor site: 1.Two 350P John Deere offroad dump trucks 2.Two EX450 Hitachi excavators 3. EX270LC Hitachi excavator 4. D6 Cat dozer 5.Dynapac 16 ton vibratory roller 6.650J John Deere dozer 7.water truck 8. Hydroseeding dispensing truck Page ofDirect TransmissionDirect TransmissionProject:Inspector:109.9111.5108.7110.5OMC %*12.5In our opinion, fill does not meet specifications as indicated by test numbers:Fill test meets compaction specificationsTan silty sand with trace of oversize111.198Moisture %:SoilFIELD DENSITY TEST REPORTAverageTan silty sand with trace of oversize3aTan silty sand with trace of oversizeTan silty sand with trace of oversize11Date: 9/16/009T09082WSDOT I405,I5 to SR169Daniel QuehlProject No.:Tan silty sand with trace of oversizeType and Number of earth moving units:Dozer and ExcavatorASTM D 698 (Standard Proctor)ASTM D 1557 (Modified Proctor)Specification Compaction and Material :95%-T99 123.5113.7113.713.2Fill over Geogrid Reinforcing at Defoor site 50' east of ditchline at station 15+15Fill over Geogrid Reinforcing at Defoor site 110' east of ditchline at station 11+50Fill over Geogrid Reinforcing at Defoor site 110' east of ditchline at station 11+50Fill over Geogrid Reinforcing at Defoor site 45'east of ditchline at station 15+25Direct TransmissionDirect Transmission*See Attached Density Work Sheet for test #'s 1 thru 3Type and Number of Compaction units:Number of Passes:16 ton roller3to4Part-time observationDry Density: 11.3QC Sample:Test No.:Contractor AdvisedFull-time observationMethod of Adding Moisture:fire hose and water truck1 footComments:LocationIn our opinion, fill generally meets specifications as indicated by test numbers:Soil Type DescriptionTan silty sand with trace of oversizeTan silty sand with trace of oversizeTan silty sand with trace of oversizeFill over Geogrid Reinforcing at Defoor site 50' east of ditchline at station 15+15Fill over Geogrid Reinforcing at Defoor site 45' east of ditchline at station 15+25-35'below finishgrde-35'below finishgrde-40'below finishgrde-40'below finishgrde23a2a3Test #11a20Tan silty sand with trace of oversize*115.8MTE Nuclear Gauge No.:Wet Density (PCF)1110.8ASTM D 6938*12.59611.5113.713.2 111.196Compaction %FieldMoisture Content %Dry Density (PCF)11.3Depth or Elevation (feet)Direct TransmissionDirect TransmissionBackscatter / Direct TransmissionLaboratoryMax Dry Density (PCF)-41'below finishgrde-41'below finishgrde113.7*115.813.2*122123.5121.2123.610.6Average13.2*10.6122.2****111.7Average20225 Cedar Valley Road, Suite 110 Ph 425.742.9360 Lynnwood, WA 98036 Fax 425.745.1737 10029 S. Tacoma Way, Suite E-2 Ph 253.584.3720 Tacoma, WA 98499 Fax 253.584.3707 7911 NE 33rd Drive, Suite 190 Ph 503.281.7515 Portland, OR 97211 Fax 503.281.7579 MTE 1400-2C, Rev 2, 4/1/08 Project #:Date: 9/16/2009 Project :20 Inspector: Test Method: WSDOT FOP for AASHTO T310 123 10+75 to 15+95 10+75 to 15+95 10+75 to 15+95 T-09082-22 T-09082-22 T-09082-22 15+15 11+50 15+25 N/A N/A N/A Common Common Common -41 -35 -40 0 degrees 109.9 108.7 111.7 90 degrees 111.5 110.5 111.1 average 110.7 109.6 111.4 0 degrees 11.0 11.5 10.6 90 degrees 10.8 10.6 11.3 average 10.9 11.1 11.0 11.68 10.90 11.94 0.00 0.00 0.00 11.68 10.90 11.94 0.68 0.21 0.40 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.68 0.21 0.40 623 94.15 98.12 96.68 115.8 113.7 113.7 95.6 96.4 98.0 12.5 13.2 13.2 13.2 13.2 13.2 12.5 13.2 13.2 (5) % Retained on #4 Sieve (% Oversize) = Mass Retained / Mass of Sample Mass of Sample (Dry or SSD) = (1) - (2) (3) Mass of Retained on #4 Sieve + Tare (4) Mass of Tare B Mass of Material Retained on #4 Sieve = (3) - (4) (1) Mass of Sample (Dry or SSD) + Tare (2) Mass of Tare A T-09082 Gradation Determination Optimum Moisture Content Corrected = ((6 x 7) + (5 x 8)) / 100 (6) % Passing #4 Sieve = (100 - % Retained) Density and Optimum Moisture Determination WSDOT T99 Percent Compaction (% of maximum) = (Dry Density / Corrected Maximum Density) x 100 Maximum Density (from Maximum Density Curve Table) (7) Optimum Moisture of Fine Material, passing #4 (from Maximum Density Curve Report) (8) Optimum Moisture of Coarse Material, retained #4 (from Maximum Density Curve Report) Average Moisture Content Reference to Centerline Moisture Content Average Dry Density lb/cu.ft. Gauge Readings Material Type Depth of Material Dry Density lbs/cu.ft. Reviewed By: Comments: Test Hole Number Soils Field Density Worksheet for WSDOT Projects (WSDOT SOP 615) Moisture Density Curve # Test Station Station to Station Worksheet used when Maximum Density is determined using WSDOT Method T99 Daniel Quehl WSDOT I405,I5 to SR169 MTE Nuclear Gauge #: