The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About20090919_DQInspector's Daily Report Project Name Date Shift Sheet 1 of 3 day Weather AM PM Inspector IDR Report # No. No. 11 1 Laborer with CDB 7 13 2 2 1 650J John Deere Dozer 1 2 1 1 Photos/Videos taken today?x Yes No File: Inspector's Shift Hours From: To:Inspector's Signature Reviewed By Signs Barricades I-405/I-5 to SR169 Stage 2 - Widening and SR515 Interchange Project cloudy, hi 68 low 54 Traffic Control Reviewed Subcontractor Number & Classification Plan SheetItem Quanity IDR Sheet Item Number Material / Item Description Major Equipment on Project CDB Number & Classification EX 270LC Hitachi excavator water truck General Foreman with CDB Foreman with CTI Operators with CTI 350P John Deere offroad dump truck(1 idle) D6 Cat dozers Dynapac 16 ton vibratory roller cloudy, hi 82 low 68 Daniel Quehl 20090919 DQ Operator with CDB Bid Items Inspected Today/Field Note Flaggers EX 450 Hitachi excavators(1 idle today) Location Structure#/Station Acceptable Date 8:30 AM Date 7:00 PM (TR 9.21.09) Laborers with CTI September 19, 2009 September 19, 2009 Daniel Quehl Inspector's Daily Report Project Number Sheet 2 of 3 Inspector IDR Report # 20090919 DQ September 19, 2009 DateIDR Sheet Daniel Quehl I-405/I-5 to SR169 Stage 2 - Widening and SR515 Interchange Project Inspector's Notes Today' s activities listed for CDB at the Defoor site: Performed observation and soil density testing on fill using common borrow over Miragird 3XT and SF-20 Geogrid reinforcing from stations 10+35 to 15+95. Performed soil density testing at above locations per T310 and SOP 615 (Method 1) using a Troxler nuclear density gauge model 3440. The moisture density relationship value of 114.5 with a 12.9% optimum moisture was used per Mayes Testing lab number T-09082-26. The tests meet the 95% required compaction. The contractor was informed of test results. See attached Field Density Report and Density Work Sheet for results and locations. While the Geogrid Reinforcing was being installed from stations 10+35 to 15+95 the following was verified: 1. Checked to assure that the proper type of Geogrid reinforcing was being used and was not damaged. 2. Checked to assure the minimum embedment depth was attained according to approved plans&specs 3. Checked that Geogrid was attached together, with the subcontractor using twist ties placed at a 1' to spacing and overlapping the Geogrid 2 to 6 inches. 4. A total of 4 rolls of SF-20 and 53 rolls of Miragrid 3XT were placed today. 5. That fill being placed did not exceed 1'. The subcontractor is using a laser to check elevations on each lift. 6. That the Geogrid was laying flat and not bundled up prior to fill being placed. 7. The unused Geogrid was covered with black plastic to protect from the sun. CTI placed a total of 3 lifts of fill over the Geogrid reinforcing which was also inspected between stations 10+35 to 10+75 and elevations 199 to 202. A total of 1 lift of fill was placed over the Geogrid reinforcing which was also inspected from elevations 201 to 202 between stations 10+75 to 15+95. CTI placed a total of 2,225 cubic yards today from a total of 89 truck loads. Visited by Rod Blalock compliance inspector with WSDOT throughout the day. Inspector's Daily Report Project Number Sheet 3 of 3 Inspector IDR Report # IDR Sheet Date 20090919 DQ Inspector's Notes I-405/I-5 to SR169 Stage 2 - Widening and SR515 Interchange Project September 19, 2009 Daniel Quehl Personal used on the Defoor site: 1. Dan Lonsdale-General Foreman with CDB 2. Kevin Wicklund-Foreman with CTI 3.Mark Klinkhammer-Operator with CTI 4.Rick Larson -Operator with CTI 5.Mark Furnier-Operator with CTI 6.Jay Knudtsen-Operator with CTI 7.Leo Dunn-Laborer /Operator with CTI 8. Robert Gamble-Operator with CTI 9.Mike Forest-Laborer with CTI 10.Mark Candee-Operator with CDB 11. Bill Smith-Laborer with CTI 12. Ken Hashon-Operator with CTI 13. Jim Davis-Laborer with CDB Equipment used on the Defoor site: 1.Two 350P John Deere offroad dump trucks(1 idle today) 2.Two EX450 Hitachi excavators(1 idle today) 3. EX270LC Hitachi excavator 4. Two D6 Cat dozers 5.Dynapac 16 ton vibratory roller 6.650J John Deere dozer 7.water truck Page of122.3****127.6125.5123.211114.5114.5*117.8*12*12AverageOMC %*11.812.910.5126.510111.7111.2Direct TransmissionCompaction %FieldMoisture Content %Dry Density (PCF)Backscatter / Direct TransmissionLaboratoryMax Dry Density (PCF)112.3111.5Tan silty sand with trace of oversize9510.3*117.412.9 114.595*117.8MTE Nuclear Gauge No.:Wet Density (PCF)13.612.6ASTM D 6938*11.8Depth or Elevation (feet)Direct Transmission23a2a3Test #11a-31'below finishgrde-31'below finishgrde-34'below finishgrde-34'below finishgrde-28'below finishgrde-28'below finishgrdeLocationIn our opinion, fill generally meets specifications as indicated by test numbers:Soil Type DescriptionTan silty sand with trace of oversizeTan silty sand with trace of oversizeTan silty sand with trace of oversizeFill over Geogrid Reinforcing at Defoor site 90' east of ditchline at station 12+00Fill over Geogrid Reinforcing at Defoor site 100' east of ditchline at station 11+30Contractor AdvisedFull-time observationMethod of Adding Moisture:fire hose and water truck1 footComments: *See Attached Density Work Sheet for test #'s 1 thru 3Type and Number of Compaction units:Number of Passes:16 ton roller3to4Part-time observationDry Density: 12.6QC Sample:Test No.:Fill over Geogrid Reinforcing at Defoor site 90' east of ditchline at station 12+00Fill over Geogrid Reinforcing at Defoor site 40' east of ditchline at station 14+30Fill over Geogrid Reinforcing at Defoor site 40' east of ditchline at station 14+30Fill over Geogrid Reinforcing at Defoor site 100' east of ditchline at station 11+30Direct Transmission126.1 113.6Type and Number of earth moving units:Dozer and ExcavatorASTM D 698 (Standard Proctor)ASTM D 1557 (Modified Proctor)Specification Compaction and Material :95%-T99 11Date: 9/19/009T09082WSDOT I405,I5 to SR169Daniel QuehlProject No.:Tan silty sand with trace of oversizeMoisture %:SoilFIELD DENSITY TEST REPORTAverageTan silty sand with trace of oversizeTan silty sand with trace of oversizeTan silty sand with trace of oversizeDirect TransmissionDirect TransmissionDirect TransmissionTan silty sand with trace of oversize*117.4*Average*Project:Inspector:1a 111.5100In our opinion, fill does not meet specifications as indicated by test numbers:Fill test meets compaction specifications2020225 Cedar Valley Road, Suite 110 Ph 425.742.9360 Lynnwood, WA 98036 Fax 425.745.1737 10029 S. Tacoma Way, Suite E-2 Ph 253.584.3720 Tacoma, WA 98499 Fax 253.584.3707 7911 NE 33rd Drive, Suite 190 Ph 503.281.7515 Portland, OR 97211 Fax 503.281.7579 MTE 1400-2C, Rev 2, 4/1/08 Project #:Date: 9/18/2009 Project :20 Inspector: Test Method: WSDOT FOP for AASHTO T310 123 10+35 to 15+95 10+35 to 15+95 10+35 to 15+95 T-09082-26 T-09082-26 T-09082-26 12+00 14+30 11+30 N/A N/A N/A Common Common Common -31 -34 -28 0 degrees 112.3 111.7 113.6 90 degrees 111.5 111.2 114.5 average 111.9 111.5 114.1 0 degrees 13.6 10.3 11.0 90 degrees 12.6 10.0 10.5 average 13.1 10.2 10.8 15.98 12.65 13.38 0.00 0.00 0.00 15.98 12.65 13.38 1.39 1.04 0.60 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.39 1.04 0.60 984 91.33 91.79 95.51 117.8 117.4 114.5 95.0 94.9 99.6 11.8 12.0 12.9 11.8 12.0 12.9 11.8 12.0 12.9 Thomas B Robinson (5) % Retained on #4 Sieve (% Oversize) = Mass Retained / Mass of Sample Mass of Sample (Dry or SSD) = (1) - (2) (3) Mass of Retained on #4 Sieve + Tare (4) Mass of Tare B Mass of Material Retained on #4 Sieve = (3) - (4) (1) Mass of Sample (Dry or SSD) + Tare (2) Mass of Tare A T-09082 Gradation Determination Average Moisture Content Reference to Centerline Moisture Content Average Dry Density lb/cu.ft. Gauge Readings Optimum Moisture Content Corrected = ((6 x 7) + (5 x 8)) / 100 (6) % Passing #4 Sieve = (100 - % Retained) Density and Optimum Moisture Determination WSDOT T99 Percent Compaction (% of maximum) = (Dry Density / Corrected Maximum Density) x 100 Maximum Density (from Maximum Density Curve Table) (7) Optimum Moisture of Fine Material, passing #4 (from Maximum Density Curve Report) (8) Optimum Moisture of Coarse Material, retained #4 (from Maximum Density Curve Report) Material Type Depth of Material Dry Density lbs/cu.ft. Test Hole Number Soils Field Density Worksheet for WSDOT Projects (WSDOT SOP 615) Moisture Density Curve # Test Station Station to Station Worksheet used when Maximum Density is determined using WSDOT Method T99 Daniel Quehl WSDOT I405,I5 to SR169 MTE Nuclear Gauge #: Reviewed By: Comments: