The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About20090923_DQInspector's Daily Report Project Name Date Shift Sheet 1 of 3 day Weather AM PM Inspector IDR Report # No. No. 11 1 Laborer with CDB 6 13 2 2 1 650J John Deere Dozer 1 2 1 1 Photos/Videos taken today?x Yes No File: Inspector's Shift Hours From: To:Inspector's Signature Reviewed By Signs Barricades I-405/I-5 to SR169 Stage 2 - Widening and SR515 Interchange Project sunny, hi 74 low 53 Traffic Control Reviewed Subcontractor Number & Classification Plan SheetItem Quanity IDR Sheet Item Number Material / Item Description Major Equipment on Project CDB Number & Classification EX 270LC Hitachi excavator with hoepack water truck General Foreman with CDB Foreman with CTI Operators with CTI 350P John Deere offroad dump truck(1 idle today) D6 Cat dozers (1 idle today) Dynapac 16 ton vibratory roller sunny, hi 83 low 74 Daniel Quehl 20090923 DQ Operator with CDB Bid Items Inspected Today/Field Note Flaggers EX 450 Hitachi excavators (1 idle today) Location Structure#/Station (idle 1/2 day) Acceptable Date 6:00 AM Date 7:00 PM TR (9/25/2009) Laborers with CTI 9/23/009 September 23, 2009 Daniel Quehl Inspector's Daily Report Project Number Sheet 2 of 3 Inspector IDR Report # 20090923 DQ September 23, 2009 DateIDR Sheet Daniel Quehl I-405/I-5 to SR169 Stage 2 - Widening and SR515 Interchange Project Inspector's NotesToday' s activities listed for CDB at the Defoor site: Attended the CDB morning meeting. Attended the WSDOT training class for Excavation,Embankment, and Drainage. Performed observation and soil density testing on fill using common borrow over Miragrid 3XT and SF-20 Geogrid reinforcing and area east of Geogrid reinforcing from stations 10+35 to 15+95. Performed soil density testing at above locations per T310 and SOP 615 (Method 1) using a Troxler nuclear density gauge model 3440. The moisture density relationship value of 117.0 with a 12.1% optimum moisture was used per Mayes Testing lab number T-09082-24. The tests meet the 95% required compaction. The contractor was informed of test results. See attached Field Density Report and Density Work Sheet for results and locations. While the Geogrid Reinforcing was being installed from stations 10+35 to 15+95 the following was verified: 1. Checked to assure that the proper type of Geogrid reinforcing was being used and was not damaged. 2. Checked to assure the minimum embedment depth was attained according to approved plans&specs 3. Checked that Geogrid was attached together, with the subcontractor using twist ties placed at a 1' to spacing and overlapping the Geogrid 2 to 6 inches. 4. A total of 35 rolls of Miragrid 3XT and 4 rolls of SF-20 were placed today. 5. That fill being placed did not exceed 1'. The subcontractor is using a laser to check elevations on each lift. 6. That the Geogrid was laying flat and not bundled up prior to fill being placed. 7. The unused Geogrid was covered with black plastic to protect from the sun. Elevation 206 was completed with installation and inspection of the Secondary Geogrid reinforcing from stations 10+35 to 15+95. Fill was placed to elevations 207 and 208 with the installation and inspection of the Primary Geogrid reinforcing from stations 12+00 to 15+95. The Secondary Geogrid reinforcing had not been placed yet at elevation 208. The 2:1 slope from the ditchline and Geogrid reinforcing stations 10+35 to 15+95 elevation 191 to 207 was Hoepacked. The CTI subcontractor placed a total of 2,525 cubic yards from a total of 101 truck loads. There was a total of 5,082 cubic yards of common borrow transported today by the conveyor belt from a total of 231 truck loads. Performed observation of the fully loaded 350D offroad dump truck driving over the compacted areas and material appeared to be firm and unyielding. Was visited by Robert Patcheck with CDB, Allan Brown with CDB, and Andy Anderson with CDB to see the progress of the project. The Holding Point was reached at elevation 206. Rick Johnson the materials technician with WSDOT and myself spoke with Kevin the Foreman with CTI that all testing had been obtained and for them to continue. Rick Johnson the materials technician with WSDOT performed a soils density test per T310 and obtained a sample per SOP 615. Visited by Rod Blalock compliance inspector with WSDOT throughout the day. Inspector's Daily Report Project Number Sheet 3 of 3 Inspector IDR Report # IDR Sheet Date 20090923 DQ Inspector's Notes I-405/I-5 to SR169 Stage 2 - Widening and SR515 Interchange Project September 23, 2009 Daniel Quehl Personal used on the Defoor site: 1. Dan Lonsdale-General Foreman with CDB 2. Kevin Wicklund-Foreman with CTI 3.Mark Klinkhammer-Operator with CTI 4.Ken Hashon -Operator with CTI 5.Mark Furnier-Operator with CTI 6.Jay Knudtsen-Operator with CTI 7.Leo Dunn-Laborer with CTI 8. Robert Gamble-Operator with CTI 9.Mike Forest-Laborer with CTI 10.Mark Candee-Operator with CDB 11. Bill Smith-Laborer with CTI 12. Jim Davis-Laborer with CDB 13.Will Fletland-Operator with CTI Equipment used on the Defoor site: 1.Two 350P John Deere offroad dump trucks(1 idle today) 2.Two EX450 Hitachi excavators(1 idle today) 3. EX270LC Hitachi excavator(idle 1/2 day) 4. Two D6 Cat dozers(1 idle today) 5.Dynapac 16 ton vibratory roller 6.650J John Deere dozer 7.water truck Page of125.1****122.6123.0122.911Average12.111711712.1AverageDepth or Elevation (feet)Direct TransmissionDirect TransmissionCompaction %FieldMoisture Content %Dry Density (PCF)Backscatter / Direct TransmissionLaboratoryMax Dry Density (PCF)9510.41179620Tan silty sand with trace of oversize117MTE Nuclear Gauge No.:Wet Density (PCF)9.910.4ASTM D 693812.1Test #11a22a-25'below finishgrde-25'below finishgrde-21'below finishgrde-21'below finishgrdeLocationIn our opinion, fill generally meets specifications as indicated by test numbers:Soil Type DescriptionTan silty sand with trace of oversizeTan silty sand with trace of oversizeTan silty sand with trace of oversizeFill over Geogrid Reinforcing at Defoor site 75' east of ditchline at station 13+00Contractor AdvisedFull-time observationMethod of Adding Moisture:fire hose and water truck1 footComments: *See Attached Density Work Sheet for test #'s 1 thru 2Type and Number of Compaction units:Number of Passes:16 ton roller3to4Part-time observationDry Density: 10.4QC Sample:Test No.:Fill over Geogrid Reinforcing at Defoor site 75' east of ditchline at station 13+00Fill over Geogrid Reinforcing at Defoor site 125' east of ditchline at station 10+75Fill over Geogrid Reinforcing at Defoor site 125' east of ditchline at station 10+75Project No.:Tan silty sand with trace of oversizeType and Number of earth moving units:Dozer and ExcavatorASTM D 698 (Standard Proctor)ASTM D 1557 (Modified Proctor)Specification Compaction and Material :95%-T99 11Date: 9/23/009T09082WSDOT I405,I5 to SR169Daniel QuehlMoisture %:SoilFIELD DENSITY TEST REPORTTan silty sand with trace of oversize1a 111.4In our opinion, fill does not meet specifications as indicated by test numbers:Fill test meets compaction specificationsDirect TransmissionDirect TransmissionProject:Inspector:111.6111.4111.3112.7OMC %12.120225 Cedar Valley Road, Suite 110 Ph 425.742.9360 Lynnwood, WA 98036 Fax 425.745.1737 10029 S. Tacoma Way, Suite E-2 Ph 253.584.3720 Tacoma, WA 98499 Fax 253.584.3707 7911 NE 33rd Drive, Suite 190 Ph 503.281.7515 Portland, OR 97211 Fax 503.281.7579 MTE 1400-2C, Rev 2, 4/1/08 Project #:Date: 9/23/2009 Project :20 Inspector: Test Method: WSDOT FOP for AASHTO T310 123 10+35 to 15+95 10+35 to 15+95 T-09082-24 T-09082-24 13+00 10+75 N/A N/A Common Common -25 -21 0 degrees 111.6 111.3 90 degrees 111.4 112.7 average 111.5 112.0 0.0 0 degrees 9.9 10.4 90 degrees 10.4 11.0 average 10.2 10.7 0.0 11.15 12.25 0.00 0.00 11.15 12.25 0.00 0.41 0.34 0.00 0.00 0.41 0.34 0.00 4 3 #DIV/0! 96.34 97.27 #DIV/0! 117.0 117.0 95.3 95.7 #DIV/0! 12.1 12.1 12.1 12.1 12.1 12.1 #DIV/0! Thomas B Robinson (5) % Retained on #4 Sieve (% Oversize) = Mass Retained / Mass of Sample Mass of Sample (Dry or SSD) = (1) - (2) (3) Mass of Retained on #4 Sieve + Tare (4) Mass of Tare B Mass of Material Retained on #4 Sieve = (3) - (4) (1) Mass of Sample (Dry or SSD) + Tare (2) Mass of Tare A T-09082 Gradation Determination Optimum Moisture Content Corrected = ((6 x 7) + (5 x 8)) / 100 (6) % Passing #4 Sieve = (100 - % Retained) Density and Optimum Moisture Determination WSDOT T99 Percent Compaction (% of maximum) = (Dry Density / Corrected Maximum Density) x 100 Maximum Density (from Maximum Density Curve Table) (7) Optimum Moisture of Fine Material, passing #4 (from Maximum Density Curve Report) (8) Optimum Moisture of Coarse Material, retained #4 (from Maximum Density Curve Report) Average Moisture Content Reference to Centerline Moisture Content Average Dry Density lb/cu.ft. Gauge Readings Material Type Depth of Material Dry Density lbs/cu.ft. Reviewed By: Comments: Test Hole Number Soils Field Density Worksheet for WSDOT Projects (WSDOT SOP 615) Moisture Density Curve # Test Station Station to Station Worksheet used when Maximum Density is determined using WSDOT Method T99 Daniel Quehl WSDOT I405,I5 to SR169 MTE Nuclear Gauge #: