The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About20090928_DQInspector's Daily Report Project Name Date Shift Sheet 1 of 3 day Weather AM PM Inspector IDR Report # No. No. 11 1 Laborer with CDB 6 13 21 1 3 Laborers with Terra Dynamics 2 2 1 650J John Deere Dozer 1 1 1 1 1 1 Photos/Videos taken today?x Yes No File: Inspector's Shift Hours From: To:Inspector's Signature Reviewed By Laborers with CTI 9/28/009 September 28, 2009 Daniel Quehl 7:00 PM TR (9.28.09) Acceptable Date 6:00 AM Date EX 450 Hitachi excavators(1 idle today) Location Structure#/Station (idle today) Bid Items Inspected Today/Field Note Flaggers cloudy, hi 64 low 62 Daniel Quehl 20090928 DQ Operator with CDB Foreman with Terra DynamicsSurveyors with CDB General Foreman with CDB Foreman with CTI Operators with CTI TC-9 Komatsu small dump crawler 350P John Deere offroad dump truck Operators with Terra Dynamics D6 Cat dozers (1 idle today) Dynapac 16 ton vibratory roller IDR Sheet Item Number Material / Item Description Major Equipment on Project CDB Number & Classification EX 270LC Hitachi excavator with hoepack water truck 312C Cat Excavator Subcontractor Number & Classification Plan SheetItem Quanity I-405/I-5 to SR169 Stage 2 - Widening and SR515 Interchange Project sunny, hi 62 low 46 Traffic Control ReviewedSigns Barricades Inspector's Daily Report Project Number Sheet 2 of 3 Inspector IDR Report # IDR Sheet Daniel Quehl I-405/I-5 to SR169 Stage 2 - Widening and SR515 Interchange Project Inspector's Notes September 28, 2009 Date 20090928 DQ Today' s activities listed for CDB at the Defoor site: Attended the CDB morning activity meeting. Attended the WSDOT wall construction training class. Performed observation and soil density testing on fill using common borrow over Miragrid 3XT and SF-55 Geogrid reinforcing(being used in place of SF-20) from stations 10+35 to 15+95 and area east of Geogrid reinforcing from stations 12+00 to 14+00(elevations 217 to 220). Performed soil density testing at above locations per T310 and SOP 615 (Method 1) using a Troxler nuclear density gauge model 3440. The moisture density relationship value of 115.9 with a 12.4% optimum moisture was used per Mayes Testing lab number T-09082-28. The tests meet the 95% required compaction. The contractor was informed of test results. See attached Field Density Report and Density Work Sheet for results and locations. Verfied that Primary Geogrid reinforcing was placed longitudinal from the slope located on the north area of the site at station 15+95. This was per the conversation with Roch Player the Engineer with CDB. While the Geogrid Reinforcing was being installed from stations 10+35 to 15+95 the following was verified: 1. Checked to assure that the proper type of Geogrid reinforcing was being used and was not damaged. 2. Checked to assure the minimum embedment depth was attained according to approved plans&specs 3. Checked that Geogrid was attached together, with the subcontractor using twist ties placed at a 1' to spacing and overlapping the Geogrid 2 to 6 inches. 4. A total of 45 rolls of Miragrid 3XT and Miragrid 3XT/SF-55(remainer of used rolls used instead of the SF-20) were placed today. 5. That fill being placed did not exceed 1'. The subcontractor is using a laser to check elevations on each lift. 6. That the Geogrid was laying flat and not bundled up prior to fill being placed. 7. The unused Geogrid was covered with black plastic to protect from the sun. Elevations 213 and 214 were completed with installation and inspection of the Secondary and Primary Geogrid reinforcing from stations 10+35 to 15+95. There was fill placed over the Secondary Geogrid reinforcing at elevation 214 but this is the only fill placed at this elevation today. The CTI subcontractor placed a total of 1,875 cubic yards from 75 truck loads of common borrow being transported by the conveyor belt. There was 4,642 cubic yards transported from the conveyor belt today from 211 truck loads. Performed observation of the fully loaded 350D offroad dump truck and water truck driving over the compacted areas and material appeared to be firm and unyielding. Performed observation as Trail King side dumpers transported a total of 200 cubic yards of Type 2 compost being placed along the 2:1 slope between the ditchline and Geogrid reinforcing from stations 10+00 to 15+95 from elevations 191 to 208. Inspector's Daily Report Project Number Sheet 3 of 3 Inspector IDR Report # Inspector's Notes I-405/I-5 to SR169 Stage 2 - Widening and SR515 Interchange Project September 28, 2009 Daniel Quehl IDR Sheet Date 20090928 DQ CTI prepared the site for the upcoming rainfall this evening. Personal used on the Defoor site: 1. Dan Lonsdale-General Foreman with CDB 2. Kevin Wicklund-Foreman with CTI 3.Mark Klinkhammer-Operator with CTI 4.Ken Hashon -Operator with CTI 5.Mark Furnier-Operator with CTI 6.Jay Knudtsen-Operator with CTI 7.Bill Smith-Laborer with CTI 8. Robert Gamble-Operator with CTI 9.Mike Forest-Laborer with CTI 10.Mark Candee-Operator with CDB 11. Jim Davis-Laborer with CDB 12.Will Fletland-Operator with CTI 13. Robert Morales-Foreman with Terra Dynamics 14.Antonio Martinez-Operator with Terra Dynamics 15. Nate Lane-Laborer with Terra Dynamics 16. Herman Garrido-laborer with Terra Dynamics 17.Manuel Garrido-Laborer with Terra Dynamics 18. Josh Taylor-Surveyor with CDB 19. Eric Johnson-Surveyor with CDB Equipment used on the Defoor site: 1.350P John Deere offroad dump truck 2.Two EX450 Hitachi excavators (1 idle today) 3. EX270LC Hitachi excavator(idle today) 4. Two D6 Cat dozers (1 idle today) 5.Dynapac 16 ton vibratory roller 6.650J John Deere dozer 7.water truck 8. 312C Cat Excavator 9. TC-9 Komatsu small dump crawler Page ofDirect TransmissionDirect TransmissionProject:Inspector:110.1111112.7113.1OMC %12.4In our opinion, fill does not meet specifications as indicated by test numbers:Fill test meets compaction specificationsTan silty sand with trace of oversize113.1100Moisture %:SoilFIELD DENSITY TEST REPORTAverageTan silty sand with trace of oversize2aTan silty sand with trace of oversizeTan silty sand with trace of oversize11Date: 9/28/009T09082WSDOT I405,I5 to SR169Daniel QuehlProject No.:Tan silty sand with trace of oversizeType and Number of earth moving units:Dozer and ExcavatorASTM D 698 (Standard Proctor)ASTM D 1557 (Modified Proctor)Specification Compaction and Material :95%-T99 127.2*115.9*115.912.4Fill area east of Geogrid Reinforcing 65' west of Cedar Road at station 13+00Fill over Geogrid Reinforcing at Defoor site 40' east of ditchline at station 14+40Fill over Geogrid Reinforcing at Defoor site 40' east of ditchline at station 14+40Fill over Geogrid Reinforcing at Defoor site 40' east of ditchline at station 12+50Direct TransmissionDirect Transmission*See Attached Density Work Sheet for test #'s 1 thru 3Type and Number of Compaction units:Number of Passes:16 ton roller3to4Part-time observationDry Density: 9.6QC Sample:Test No.:Contractor AdvisedFull-time observationMethod of Adding Moisture:fire hose and water truck1 footComments:LocationIn our opinion, fill generally meets specifications as indicated by test numbers:Soil Type DescriptionTan silty sand with trace of oversizeTan silty sand with trace of oversizeTan silty sand with trace of oversizeFill area east of Geogrid Reinforcing 65' west of Cedar Road at station 13+00Fill over Geogrid Reinforcing at Defoor site 40' east of ditchline at station 12+50-22'below finishgrde-22'below finishgrde-18'below finishgrde-18'below finishgrde23a2a3Test #11a20Tan silty sand with trace of oversize*115.9MTE Nuclear Gauge No.:Wet Density (PCF)11.711.3ASTM D 693812.4969.6*115.912.4 114.498Compaction %FieldMoisture Content %Dry Density (PCF)10.2Depth or Elevation (feet)Direct TransmissionDirect TransmissionBackscatter / Direct TransmissionLaboratoryMax Dry Density (PCF)-14'below finishgrde-14'below finishgrde*115.9*115.912.4*123.0123.5123.5126.19.6Average12.4*10.3124****115.3Average20225 Cedar Valley Road, Suite 110 Ph 425.742.9360 Lynnwood, WA 98036 Fax 425.745.1737 10029 S. Tacoma Way, Suite E-2 Ph 253.584.3720 Tacoma, WA 98499 Fax 253.584.3707 7911 NE 33rd Drive, Suite 190 Ph 503.281.7515 Portland, OR 97211 Fax 503.281.7579 MTE 1400-2C, Rev 2, 4/1/08 Project #:Date: 9/28/2009 Project :20 Inspector: Test Method: WSDOT FOP for AASHTO T310 123 12+00 to 14+00 10+35 to 15+95 10+35 to 15+95 T-09082-28 T-09082-28 T-09082-28 13+00 14+40 12+50 N/A N/A N/A Common Common Common -14 -22 -18 0 degrees 110.1 112.7 115.3 90 degrees 111.0 113.1 114.4 average 110.6 112.9 114.9 0 degrees 11.7 9.6 10.3 90 degrees 11.3 9.6 10.2 average 11.5 9.6 10.3 13.46 10.95 11.94 0.00 0.00 0.00 13.46 10.95 11.94 0.50 0.53 0.69 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.50 0.53 0.69 456 96.26 95.14 94.22 115.9 115.8 115.7 95.4 97.5 99.3 12.4 9.2 9.2 12.4 9.2 9.2 12.4 9.2 9.2 Thomas B Robinson Reviewed By: Comments: Soils Field Density Worksheet for WSDOT Projects (WSDOT SOP 615) Moisture Density Curve # Test Station Station to Station Worksheet used when Maximum Density is determined using WSDOT Method T99 Daniel Quehl WSDOT I405,I5 to SR169 MTE Nuclear Gauge #: Material Type Depth of Material Dry Density lbs/cu.ft. Test Hole Number Optimum Moisture Content Corrected = ((6 x 7) + (5 x 8)) / 100 (6) % Passing #4 Sieve = (100 - % Retained) Density and Optimum Moisture Determination WSDOT T99 Percent Compaction (% of maximum) = (Dry Density / Corrected Maximum Density) x 100 Maximum Density (from Maximum Density Curve Table) (7) Optimum Moisture of Fine Material, passing #4 (from Maximum Density Curve Report) (8) Optimum Moisture of Coarse Material, retained #4 (from Maximum Density Curve Report) (1) Mass of Sample (Dry or SSD) + Tare (2) Mass of Tare A T-09082 Gradation Determination Average Moisture Content Reference to Centerline Moisture Content Average Dry Density lb/cu.ft. Gauge Readings (5) % Retained on #4 Sieve (% Oversize) = Mass Retained / Mass of Sample Mass of Sample (Dry or SSD) = (1) - (2) (3) Mass of Retained on #4 Sieve + Tare (4) Mass of Tare B Mass of Material Retained on #4 Sieve = (3) - (4)