Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout20090929_DQInspector's Daily Report Project Name Date Shift Sheet 1 of 3 day Weather AM PM Inspector IDR Report # No. No. 11 1 Laborer with CDB 6 12 1 2 4 Laborers with Terra Dynamics 2 2 1 650J John Deere Dozer 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 Photos/Videos taken today?x Yes No File: Inspector's Shift Hours From: To:Inspector's Signature Reviewed By Signs Barricades I-405/I-5 to SR169 Stage 2 - Widening and SR515 Interchange Project cloudy, hi 55 low 48 Traffic Control Reviewed Subcontractor Number & Classification Plan SheetItem Quanity IDR Sheet Item Number Material / Item Description Major Equipment on Project CDB Number & Classification EX 270LC Hitachi excavator with hoepack water truck 312C Cat Excavator(idle today) General Foreman with CDB Foreman with CTI Operators with CTI TC-9 Komatsu small dump crawler(idle) 350P John Deere offroad dump truck Operators with Terra Dynamics D6 Cat dozers (1 idle today) Dynapac 16 ton vibratory roller cloudy, hi 61 low 55 Daniel Quehl 20090929 DQ Operator with CDB Foreman with Terra Dynamics Bid Items Inspected Today/Field Note Flaggers EX 450 Hitachi excavators(1 idle today) Location Structure#/Station water truck(for dispensing hydroseeding) Acceptable Date 6:00 AM Date 7:00 PM TR (9.30.09) Laborers with CTI 9/29/009 September 29, 2009 Daniel Quehl Inspector's Daily Report Project Number Sheet 2 of 3 Inspector IDR Report # 20090929 DQ September 29, 2009 DateIDR Sheet Daniel Quehl I-405/I-5 to SR169 Stage 2 - Widening and SR515 Interchange Project Inspector's NotesToday' s activities listed for CDB at the Defoor site: Attended the CDB morning activity meeting. Performed observation and soil density testing on fill using common borrow over Miragrid 3XT and SF-55 /Miragrid 3XT Geogrid reinforcing(remainder of used rolls being used in place of SF-20) from stations 10+35 to 15+95 and area east of Geogrid reinforcing from stations 12+00 to 14+00(elevations 220 to 225). Performed soil density testing at above locations per T310 and SOP 615 (Method 1) using a Troxler nuclear density gauge model 3440. The moisture density relationship value of 115.9 with a 12.4% optimum moisture was used per Mayes Testing lab number T-09082-28. The tests meet the 95% required compaction. The contractor was informed of test results. See attached Field Density Report and Density Work Sheet for results and locations. Verfied that Primary Geogrid reinforcing was placed longitudinal from the slope located on the north area of the site at station 15+95. This was per the conversation with Roch Player the Engineer with CDB. While the Geogrid Reinforcing was being installed from stations 10+35 to 15+95 the following was verified: 1. Checked to assure that the proper type of Geogrid reinforcing was being used and was not damaged. 2. Checked to assure the minimum embedment depth was attained according to approved plans&specs 3. Checked that Geogrid was attached together, with the subcontractor using twist ties placed at a 1' to spacing and overlapping the Geogrid 2 to 6 inches. 4. A total of 49 rolls of Miragrid 3XT were placed today. 5. That fill being placed did not exceed 1'. The subcontractor is using a laser to check elevations on each lift. 6. That the Geogrid was laying flat and not bundled up prior to fill being placed. 7. The unused Geogrid was covered with black plastic to protect from the sun. Elevation 215 was completed with installation and inspection of the Primary Geogrid reinforcing from stations 10+35 to 15+95. At elevation 216 fill was placed from same previous station numbers but no Secondary Geogrid reinforcing was placed today at this elevation. CTI placed a total of 2,925 cubic yards from 117 truck loads of common borrow being transported by the conveyor belt. There was 4,972 cubic yards transported from the conveyor belt today from 226 truck loads. Performed observation of the fully loaded 350D offroad dump truck and water truck driving over the compacted areas and material appeared to be firm and unyielding. Terra Dynamics placed along the 2:1 slope Ecofibre hydroseeding and waddle from stations 10+00 to 15+95,and unwoven coconut matting from stations 10+00 to 10+35 from elevations 191 to 208. Visited by Chad Webley the Field Eng. with CDB,Allan Brown with CDB, and Robert Patcheck with CDB to see the progress of the project. Ken Viren the materials technician with WSDOT performed a soils density test per T310 and obtained a sample per SOP 615. Bob Pyle the compliance inspector with WSDOT visited the site throughout the day. Performed observation as the quarry spalls along the bottom of the access road leading into the site were incorporated into the common borrow while placing fill at station 14+25 in non reinforcing area. Inspector's Daily Report Project Number Sheet 3 of 3 Inspector IDR Report # IDR Sheet Date 20090929 DQ Inspector's Notes I-405/I-5 to SR169 Stage 2 - Widening and SR515 Interchange Project September 29, 2009 Daniel Quehl The Holding Point was reached at elevation 216 and Ken Viren the Materials Technician with WSDOT and myself spoke with Kevin Wicklund the Foreman with CTI that soils density testing for WSDOT at this elevation will be obtained tomorrow morning . Personal used on the Defoor site: 1. Dan Lonsdale-General Foreman with CDB 2. Kevin Wicklund-Foreman with CTI 3.Mark Klinkhammer-Operator with CTI 4.Ken Hashon -Operator with CTI 5.Mark Furnier-Operator with CTI 6.Jay Knudtsen-Operator with CTI 7.Bill Smith-Laborer with CTI 8. Robert Gamble-Operator with CTI 9.Mike Forest-Laborer with CTI 10.Mark Candee-Operator with CDB 11. Jim Davis-Laborer with CDB 12.Will Fletland-Operator with CTI 13. Robert Morales-Foreman with Terra Dynamics 14.Antonio Martinez-Operator with Terra Dynamics 15. Nate Lane-Laborer with Terra Dynamics 16. Herman Garrido-laborer with Terra Dynamics 17.Manuel Garrido-Laborer with Terra Dynamics 18.Reginaldo Morales-Laborer /Operator with Terra Dynamics Equipment used on the Defoor site: 1.350P John Deere offroad dump truck 2.Two EX450 Hitachi excavators (1 idle today) 3. EX270LC Hitachi excavator with Hoepack 4. Two D6 Cat dozers (1 idle today) 5.Dynapac 16 ton vibratory roller 6.650J John Deere dozer 7.water truck 8. 312C Cat Excavator (idle today) 9. TC-9 Komatsu small dump crawler(idle today) 10. water truck(for dispensing the hydroseeding) Page of124.1****122.7124.1124.710.9*115.7*115.7115.9*9.2*9.2AverageOMC %12.4*9.211124.511.3111.9111.4Direct TransmissionCompaction %FieldMoisture Content %Dry Density (PCF)Backscatter / Direct TransmissionLaboratoryMax Dry Density (PCF)112.2112.5Tan silty sand with trace of oversize9711.4*115.7*9.2 112.297115.9MTE Nuclear Gauge No.:Wet Density (PCF)9.410.3ASTM D 693812.4Depth or Elevation (feet)Direct Transmission23a2a3Test #11a-9'below finishgrde-9'below finishgrde-21'below finishgrde-21'below finishgrde-15'below finishgrde-15'below finishgrdeLocationIn our opinion, fill generally meets specifications as indicated by test numbers:Soil Type DescriptionTan silty sand with trace of oversizeTan silty sand with trace of oversizeTan silty sand with trace of oversizeFill area east of Geogrid Reinforcing 35' west of Cedar Road at station 12+80Fill over Geogrid Reinforcing at Defoor site 125' east of ditchline at station 11+50Contractor AdvisedFull-time observationMethod of Adding Moisture:fire hose and water truck1 footComments: *See Attached Density Work Sheet for test #'s 1 thru 3Type and Number of Compaction units:Number of Passes:16 ton roller&Hoepack3to4Part-time observationDry Density: 10.3QC Sample:Test No.:Fill area east of Geogrid Reinforcing 35' west of Cedar Road at station 12+80Fill over Geogrid Reinforcing at Defoor site 65' east of ditchline at station 14+70Fill over Geogrid Reinforcing at Defoor site 65' east of ditchline at station 14+70Fill over Geogrid Reinforcing at Defoor site 125' east of ditchline at station 11+50Direct Transmission125.9 113.5Type and Number of earth moving units:Dozer and ExcavatorASTM D 698 (Standard Proctor)ASTM D 1557 (Modified Proctor)Specification Compaction and Material :95%-T99 11Date: 9/29/009T09082WSDOT I405,I5 to SR169Daniel QuehlProject No.:Tan silty sand with trace of oversizeMoisture %:SoilFIELD DENSITY TEST REPORTAverageTan silty sand with trace of oversizeTan silty sand with trace of oversizeTan silty sand with trace of oversizeDirect TransmissionDirect TransmissionDirect TransmissionTan silty sand with trace of oversize*115.7*Average*Project:Inspector:1a 112.598In our opinion, fill does not meet specifications as indicated by test numbers:Fill test meets compaction specifications2020225 Cedar Valley Road, Suite 110 Ph 425.742.9360 Lynnwood, WA 98036 Fax 425.745.1737 10029 S. Tacoma Way, Suite E-2 Ph 253.584.3720 Tacoma, WA 98499 Fax 253.584.3707 7911 NE 33rd Drive, Suite 190 Ph 503.281.7515 Portland, OR 97211 Fax 503.281.7579 MTE 1400-2C, Rev 2, 4/1/08 Project #:Date: 9/29/2009 Project :20 Inspector: Test Method: WSDOT FOP for AASHTO T310 123 12+00 to 14+00 10+35 to 15+95 10+35 to 15+95 T-09082-28 T-09082-28 T-09082-28 12+80 14+70 11+50 N/A N/A N/A Common Common Common -9 -21 -15 0 degrees 112.2 111.9 113.5 90 degrees 112.5 111.4 112.2 average 112.4 111.7 112.9 0 degrees 9.4 11.4 10.9 90 degrees 10.3 11.3 11.0 average 9.9 11.4 11.0 13.10 10.95 11.94 0.00 0.00 0.00 13.10 10.95 11.94 0.43 0.53 0.69 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.43 0.53 0.69 356 96.70 95.14 94.22 115.9 115.7 115.7 96.9 96.5 97.5 12.4 9.2 9.2 12.4 9.2 9.2 12.4 9.2 9.2 Thomas B Robinson (5) % Retained on #4 Sieve (% Oversize) = Mass Retained / Mass of Sample Mass of Sample (Dry or SSD) = (1) - (2) (3) Mass of Retained on #4 Sieve + Tare (4) Mass of Tare B Mass of Material Retained on #4 Sieve = (3) - (4) (1) Mass of Sample (Dry or SSD) + Tare (2) Mass of Tare A T-09082 Gradation Determination Optimum Moisture Content Corrected = ((6 x 7) + (5 x 8)) / 100 (6) % Passing #4 Sieve = (100 - % Retained) Density and Optimum Moisture Determination WSDOT T99 Percent Compaction (% of maximum) = (Dry Density / Corrected Maximum Density) x 100 Maximum Density (from Maximum Density Curve Table) (7) Optimum Moisture of Fine Material, passing #4 (from Maximum Density Curve Report) (8) Optimum Moisture of Coarse Material, retained #4 (from Maximum Density Curve Report) Average Moisture Content Reference to Centerline Moisture Content Average Dry Density lb/cu.ft. Gauge Readings Material Type Depth of Material Dry Density lbs/cu.ft. Reviewed By: Comments: Test Hole Number Soils Field Density Worksheet for WSDOT Projects (WSDOT SOP 615) Moisture Density Curve # Test Station Station to Station Worksheet used when Maximum Density is determined using WSDOT Method T99 Daniel Quehl WSDOT I405,I5 to SR169 MTE Nuclear Gauge #: