Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout20090930_DQInspector's Daily Report Project Name Date Shift Sheet 1 of 3 day Weather AM PM Inspector IDR Report # No. No. 11 1 Laborer with CDB 6 12 1 5 2 2 1 650J John Deere Dozer 1 1 1 1 1 1 Photos/Videos taken today?x Yes No File: Inspector's Shift Hours From: To:Inspector's Signature Reviewed By Laborers with CTI 9/30/009 September 30, 2009 Daniel Quehl 7:00 PM (TR 10.1.09) Acceptable Date 6:00 AM Date EX 450 Hitachi excavators(1 idle today) Location Structure#/Station Bid Items Inspected Today/Field Note Flaggers partly cloudy, hi 60 low 54 Daniel Quehl 20090930 DQ Operator with CDB Foreman with Terra Dynamics General Foreman with CDB Foreman with CTI Operators with CTI TC-9 Komatsu small dump crawler(idle) 350P John Deere offroad dump truck Laborers with Terra Dynamics D6 Cat dozers (1 idle today) Dynapac 16 ton vibratory roller IDR Sheet Item Number Material / Item Description Major Equipment on Project CDB Number & Classification EX 270LC Hitachi excavator with hoepack water truck 312C Cat Excavator(idle today) Subcontractor Number & Classification Plan SheetItem Quanity I-405/I-5 to SR169 Stage 2 - Widening and SR515 Interchange Project partly cloudy, hi 54 low 44 Traffic Control ReviewedSigns Barricades Inspector's Daily Report Project Number Sheet 2 of 3 Inspector IDR Report # IDR Sheet Daniel Quehl I-405/I-5 to SR169 Stage 2 - Widening and SR515 Interchange Project Inspector's Notes September 30, 2009 Date 20090930 DQ Today' s activities listed for CDB at the Defoor site: Attended the CDB morning activity meeting. Performed observation and soil density testing on fill using common borrow over Miragrid 3XT and SF-55 /Miragrid 3XT Geogrid reinforcing(remainder of used rolls being used in place of SF-20 Secondary Geogrid reinforcing) from stations 10+35 to 15+95 and area east of Geogrid reinforcing from stations 12+00 to 14+00(elevations 225 to 228). Performed soil density testing at above locations per T310 and SOP 615 (Method 1) using a Troxler nuclear density gauge model 3440. The moisture density relationship value of 115.9 with a 12.4% optimum moisture was used per Mayes Testing lab number T-09082-28. The tests meet the 95% required compaction. The contractor was informed of test results. See attached Field Density Report and Density Work Sheet for results and locations. While the Geogrid Reinforcing was being installed from stations 10+35 to 15+95 the following was verified: 1. Checked to assure that the proper type of Geogrid reinforcing was being used and was not damaged. 2. Checked to assure the minimum embedment depth was attained according to approved plans&specs 3. Checked that Geogrid was attached together, with the subcontractor using twist ties placed at a 1' to spacing and overlapping the Geogrid 2 to 6 inches. 4. Rolls of Miragrid 3XT/SF-55(remainder of the used rolls used in place of SF-20) for Secondary Geogrid reinforcing were placed today. 5. That fill being placed did not exceed 1'. The subcontractor is using a laser to check elevations on each lift. 6. That the Geogrid was laying flat and not bundled up prior to fill being placed. 7. The unused Geogrid was covered with black plastic to protect from the sun. Elevation 216 was completed with installation and inspection of the Secondary Geogrid reinforcing from stations 10+35 to 15+95. At elevation 217 the fill was placed and compacted but no Primary Geogrid reinforcing had been placed at this elevation yet. CTI placed a total of 1,775 cubic yards from 71 truck loads of common borrow being transported by the conveyor belt. There was 3,740 cubic yards transported from the conveyor belt today from 170 truck loads. Performed observation of the fully loaded 350D offroad dump truck and water truck driving over the compacted areas and material appeared to be firm and unyielding. Terra Dynamics placed along the 2:1 slope unwoven coconut matting from stations 10+35 to 15+95 and elevations 191 to 208. Visited by Roch Player the Engineer with CDB and Mr.Gary Merlino to see the progress of the project. Ken Viren the materials technician with WSDOT performed a soils density test per T310 and obtained a sample per SOP 615. Bob Pyle the compliance inspector with WSDOT visited the site throughout the day. The Holding Point was reached at elevation 216 and Ken Viren the Materials Technician with WSDOT along with myself spoke with Kevin Wicklund the Foreman with CTI that all testing had been obtained and that it was alright to continue. Tim Berstrom inspector for Mayes testing obtained a sample for a T-99 moisture density relationship from the stockpile at the conveyor belt. Inspector's Daily Report Project Number Sheet 3 of 3 Inspector IDR Report # Inspector's Notes I-405/I-5 to SR169 Stage 2 - Widening and SR515 Interchange Project September 30, 2009 Daniel Quehl IDR Sheet Date 20090930 DQ The stockpile of unsuitable material located on the northeast area of the site was transported to the non reinforcing area next to Cedar road from stations 12+00 to 14+00. A total of 1,175 cubic yards was transported from the stockpile from a total of 47 truck loads. 1. Dan Lonsdale-General Foreman with CDB 2. Kevin Wicklund-Foreman with CTI 3.Mark Klinkhammer-Operator with CTI 4.Ken Hashon -Operator with CTI 5.Mark Furnier-Operator with CTI 6.Jay Knudtsen-Operator with CTI 7.Bill Smith-Laborer with CTI 8. Robert Gamble-Operator with CTI 9.Mike Forest-Laborer with CTI 10.Mark Candee-Operator with CDB 11. Jim Davis-Laborer with CDB 12.Will Fletland-Operator with CTI 13. Robert Morales-Foreman with Terra Dynamics 14.Antonio Martinez-Laborer with Terra Dynamics 15. Nate Lane-Laborer with Terra Dynamics 16. Herman Garrido-laborer with Terra Dynamics 17.Manuel Garrido-Laborer with Terra Dynamics 18.Reginaldo Morales-Laborer with Terra Dynamics Equipment used on the Defoor site: 1.350P John Deere offroad dump truck 2.Two EX450 Hitachi excavators (1 idle today) 3. EX270LC Hitachi excavator with Hoepack 4. Two D6 Cat dozers (1 idle today) 5.Dynapac 16 ton vibratory roller 6.650J John Deere dozer 7.water truck 8. 312C Cat Excavator (idle today) 9. TC-9 Komatsu small dump crawler(idle today) Page of126.7****123.6124.7127.910.4115.9115.9115.912.412.4AverageOMC %12.412.410.6122.911.8113.1113.3Direct TransmissionCompaction %FieldMoisture Content %Dry Density (PCF)Backscatter / Direct TransmissionLaboratoryMax Dry Density (PCF)111.4111.6Tan silty sand with trace of oversize9613.1115.912.4 111.198115.9MTE Nuclear Gauge No.:Wet Density (PCF)10.911.8ASTM D 693812.4Depth or Elevation (feet)Direct Transmission23a2a3Test #11a-16'below finishgrde-16'below finishgrde-20'below finishgrde-20'below finishgrde-15'below finishgrde-15'below finishgrdeLocationIn our opinion, fill generally meets specifications as indicated by test numbers:Soil Type DescriptionTan silty sand with trace of oversizeTan silty sand with trace of oversizeTan silty sand with trace of oversizeFill over Geogrid Reinforcing at Defoor site 125' east of ditchline at station 12+30Fill over Geogrid Reinforcing at Defoor site 130' east of ditchline at station 13+00Contractor AdvisedFull-time observationMethod of Adding Moisture:fire hose and water truck1 footComments: *See Attached Density Work Sheet for test #'s 1 thru 3Type and Number of Compaction units:Number of Passes:16 ton roller&Hoepack3to4Part-time observationDry Density: 11.8QC Sample:Test No.:Fill over Geogrid Reinforcing at Defoor site 125' east of ditchline at station 12+30Fill over Geogrid Reinforcing at Defoor site 100' east of ditchline at station 15+00Fill over Geogrid Reinforcing at Defoor site 100' east of ditchline at station 15+00Fill over Geogrid Reinforcing at Defoor site 130' east of ditchline at station 13+00Direct Transmission122.8 111.2Type and Number of earth moving units:Dozer and ExcavatorASTM D 698 (Standard Proctor)ASTM D 1557 (Modified Proctor)Specification Compaction and Material :95%-T99 11Date: 9/30/009T09082WSDOT I405,I5 to SR169Daniel QuehlProject No.:Tan silty sand with trace of oversizeMoisture %:SoilFIELD DENSITY TEST REPORTAverageTan silty sand with trace of oversizeTan silty sand with trace of oversizeTan silty sand with trace of oversizeDirect TransmissionDirect TransmissionDirect TransmissionTan silty sand with trace of oversize115.9*Average*Project:Inspector:1a 111.696In our opinion, fill does not meet specifications as indicated by test numbers:Fill test meets compaction specifications2020225 Cedar Valley Road, Suite 110 Ph 425.742.9360 Lynnwood, WA 98036 Fax 425.745.1737 10029 S. Tacoma Way, Suite E-2 Ph 253.584.3720 Tacoma, WA 98499 Fax 253.584.3707 7911 NE 33rd Drive, Suite 190 Ph 503.281.7515 Portland, OR 97211 Fax 503.281.7579 MTE 1400-2C, Rev 2, 4/1/08 Project #:Date: 9/30/2009 Project :20 Inspector: Test Method: WSDOT FOP for AASHTO T310 123 10+35 to 15+95 10+35 to 15+95 10+35 to 15+95 T-09082-28 T-09082-28 T-09082-28 12+30 15+00 13+00 N/A N/A N/A Common Common Common -16 -20 -15 0 degrees 111.4 113.1 111.2 90 degrees 111.6 113.3 111.1 average 111.5 113.2 111.2 0 degrees 10.9 13.1 10.4 90 degrees 11.8 11.8 10.6 average 11.4 12.5 10.5 11.44 12.07 11.18 0.00 0.00 0.00 11.44 12.07 11.18 0.41 0.21 0.50 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.41 0.21 0.50 424 96.38 98.29 95.51 115.9 115.9 115.9 96.2 97.7 95.9 12.4 12.4 12.4 12.4 12.4 12.4 12.4 12.4 12.4 Thomas B Robinson Reviewed By: Comments: Soils Field Density Worksheet for WSDOT Projects (WSDOT SOP 615) Moisture Density Curve # Test Station Station to Station Worksheet used when Maximum Density is determined using WSDOT Method T99 Daniel Quehl WSDOT I405,I5 to SR169 MTE Nuclear Gauge #: Material Type Depth of Material Dry Density lbs/cu.ft. Test Hole Number Optimum Moisture Content Corrected = ((6 x 7) + (5 x 8)) / 100 (6) % Passing #4 Sieve = (100 - % Retained) Density and Optimum Moisture Determination WSDOT T99 Percent Compaction (% of maximum) = (Dry Density / Corrected Maximum Density) x 100 Maximum Density (from Maximum Density Curve Table) (7) Optimum Moisture of Fine Material, passing #4 (from Maximum Density Curve Report) (8) Optimum Moisture of Coarse Material, retained #4 (from Maximum Density Curve Report) (1) Mass of Sample (Dry or SSD) + Tare (2) Mass of Tare A T-09082 Gradation Determination Average Moisture Content Reference to Centerline Moisture Content Average Dry Density lb/cu.ft. Gauge Readings (5) % Retained on #4 Sieve (% Oversize) = Mass Retained / Mass of Sample Mass of Sample (Dry or SSD) = (1) - (2) (3) Mass of Retained on #4 Sieve + Tare (4) Mass of Tare B Mass of Material Retained on #4 Sieve = (3) - (4)