HomeMy WebLinkAboutAnnexation Handouts ANNEXATION POLICY
Background:
• The City of Renton approved three large Potential Annexation Areas(PAAs) incorporated in the
City Comprehensive Plan and King County Countywide Planning Policies.The three PAAs are
divided between three large geographical areas: East Renton (approx. 6,500 pop.), West Hill
(approx. 14,000 pop.), and Fairwood (approx. 23,000 pop.) (PAA map attached)
• Since 1990,the City has completed 66 annexations totaling 4,886 acres and these annexations
have significantly changed the size and character of the City. (Map attached)
• Also during that same period of time, population in the City has gone from 41,688 to 104,100
today.
• In 2016,the City resumed charging a fee for annexations; $2,500 for annexations larger than 10
acres and $5,000 for annexations smaller than 10 acres.
Currently:
• All annexations currently in process are small annexations using the property owner driven 60%
Assessed Value method. These annexations range in size from 8-acres with an estimated 8
residents to 20-acres with an estimated 118 residents.
• The City uses a fiscal analysis model that was developed by an interdepartmental group and
includes costs that increase at a faster rate than revenue. The analysis evaluates current
conditions and anticipated conditions in 10 years.
o Since the model was developed in 2011, all proposed annexations are evaluated with
this fiscal analysis and the vast majority have been either revenue neutral or a slight
revenue gain to the City.
o However, much of the gain is based on new housing development which over time
declines, depending on the assessed valuation of the improvements, in regards to
positive fiscal contributions and fiscal implications still merit consideration given
changes in the economy in general and the long term impacts new residents have on
City resources.
• Many County annexed areas have presented challenges for the City in terms of vested
residential development projects that the City must usher through the development process.
The rural street standards also present challenges for the City.
o In response to this, the Council adopted a Resolution asking King County to develop an
Interlocal Agreement that ensures greater consistency between the County and the City
within the PAA.
■ To date,the County has not acted on this request by the City.
• Significant consideration is given to annexation requests that are within the Renton School
District boundary(map attached).
• When properties annex,the City benefits from ensuring new development occurs with Renton
development regulations. If properties don't annex, new development will still occur, but using
King County development regulations. In East Plateau,where the City is the sewer provider, new
development is limited by requirements for septic systems.
• Only areas within Renton's PAA's can be annexed.These areas were designated in 1994 and
have not been reviewed or amended since.
• Until January 1, 2015, state law supported annexations of populations over 10,000 by offering a
"credit" against the state portion of the sales tax to offset transition costs and some of the
deficits to serve the areas over 10 years.This funding helped cities close some of the gap
between service costs and revenues.
o Without this supportive funding from the state,the city faces financial challenges with
annexing the PAA's.
■ In the absence of support from the State, it seems appropriate to no longer
accept large annexations of Renton's PAA's.
• Recently,the City has had some property owners not honor covenants to annex that were
signed as part of extending sewer to their property. A sewer service area (map attached).
Future:
• The appropriateness and consistency with current goals and responsibilities of the City in
maintaining all the three PAA's as areas that could be annexed to the City should be evaluated.
o Small annexations that help make the City boundary more logical and balanced
("cleaned up")seem appropriate.
• Should the City reconsider the extent of the City's future city limits as defined by the PAA?
• Should the City review and consider revising the sewer service area boundary to be coterminous
with existing City limits and amend the sewer service area boundary only after an area annexes?
• Consider requesting, again,that King County develop a joint planning agreement to address
consistency of developments with Renton's standards through an inter-local agreement.
I
SIDEWALK CONSTRUCTION AND MAINTENANCE FUNDING
Background:
• Sidewalks and walkways in the public right-of-way have long been a priority for the City.
• The City's Street Standards require frontage improvements be installed with new subdivisions at
the time they are developed.
• Nevertheless, many arterial and local streets were constructed in Renton prior to the current
standards and lack sidewalks on either one or both sides.
• Additionally, annexations have incorporated new neighborhoods into the city that were
developed under King County development standards.The newer neighborhoods have
sidewalks per current King County Road Standards, but older neighborhoods may have been
developed without sidewalks under older King County Road Standards.
• An assessment of sidewalk needs were last addressed in the City of Renton—Comprehensive
Citywide Walkway Study(March 2008), which did not include most of the Benson Hill
annexation (2008).
• That Study estimated that of the 463 miles of street edge in the City, only 266 miles of sidewalk
were in place, and that the minimum cost per linear mile of installing sidewalk to city standards
was$700,000.
• The City's current budget for the Walkway Program (the program that provides for the design
and construction of high-priority sidewalks (i.e., "missing links")) is$200,000 for 2019, and
$250,000 for each year after until 2024.
Methods of funding construction and maintenance programs:
A variety of sources are available to fund sidewalk construction and maintenance programs. In general,
funding strategies can be split into two categories: (1) programs that are funded by abutting property
owners, and (2) programs funded by community taxes,funds and fees.
General Fund
Sidewalk repair and replacement is commonly paid for through the general fund, which is typically
funded by property and sales tax revenues. Sidewalk repair and replacement projects often compete
with other projects and funding obligations.
Community-Paid Repair and Maintenance Programs
Many communities treat sidewalks as a community-wide asset,and fund their repair and maintenance
directly. Typically, these funds come from a municipality's general fund or transportation fund. A
community-paid program eases administrative costs compared to assessment programs and spreads
the costs for pedestrian facility maintenance over the entire community. The primary concern with
community-paid maintenance programs is that funds must be budgeted for the program. Fees and
taxes that are commonly used to fund pedestrian facility maintenance programs are briefly discussed
in the example below.
Communitywide Assessments:
Ann Arbor, Michigan
The City of Ann Arbor, Michigan, has a voter-approved sidewalk millage tax (i.e., property tax) that
generates$560,000 or more per year for sidewalk repair and replacement. The tax was proposed by
city officials as a means to address significant sidewalk maintenance that was not being adequately
addressed through the city's code requirements, which assigns the responsibility of sidewalk
maintenance to the adjacent property owner. The special millage was seen as a more equitable and
effective means to address the city's sidewalk maintenance needs and was approved by over 60%of
voters. As a result of the 0.125-mill, the average household pays an additional $13 per year in local
taxes.
Improvement Districts
Many communities have downtown or other business district areas that (i.e. Business Improvement
Districts, Community Improvement Districts, Business Improvement Area, transportation
improvement districts, etc.) have assumed responsibility of sidewalk maintenance. These special
districts may fund sidewalk maintenance through their general funds or may assess local property
owners for general sidewalk maintenance as well as necessary repairs and replacements.
Utility Fees
Utility fees are used by some municipalities to fund street and sidewalk maintenance.Often such fees
are voter-approved. Typically the utility fee an individual household pays is relatively small, but the
steady funding source enables municipalities to plan and execute maintenance activities in a
systematic way. Utility fees may be specific line items, such as a sidewalk maintenance fee collected
directly by the municipality, or may be a tax on electric or natural gas service collected by the utility.
Utility Fees
Corvallis, Oregon
Corvallis,Oregon, includes a sidewalk maintenance fee as part of residents' monthly City Services bill,
which also includes water and sewer charges. The $0.80 monthly fee was determined by taking the
average yearly cost to repair defective sidewalks ($150,000) divided by the number of utility
customers divided by 12. Prior to the imposition of the utility fee, property owners paid for repairs to
sidewalks in the public right-of-way along their property. Now, the City will use the money raised by
the fee to pay for repairs to defects on public sidewalks.
Cheney, Washington
Cheney, Washington, uses a voter-approved tax on electrical and natural gas services to fund
maintenance of residential streets and sidewalks. The 4% electric and natural gas tax generates
roughly $380,000 annually. This dedicated funding paid for the repair of nearly 18 miles of existing
residential streets and nearly 6 miles of existing residential sidewalks throughout the city over 14
years.
Sales Tax
Many communities indirectly use sales tax revenues to fund pedestrian facility maintenance by way
of the general fund.Additionally, many states allow local municipalities or counties to impose a small
local sales tax that could be earmarked for pedestrian facility maintenance. Sales tax revenue, direct
or indirect, is a common source of funding for street maintenance and there are communities that
use these revenues to also fund sidewalk repair and replacement programs.
Shoreline, Washington
The City of Shoreline established a voter-approved sales and use tax of 0.2%, for a term of 20 years,
to fund sidewalk transportation improvements. The tax will repay indebtedness issued from time to
time to construct, maintain, rehabilitate, repair and/or preserve sidewalks and pedestrian
improvements.
Next Steps:
Refer this matter to the Transportation/Aviation Committee and direct staff of the Department of
Public Works to explore implementation of one or more of the above funding sources.
Ammih,
Potential Annexation Areas
. ,
Ei7; %144
111/
)
4—
Bellevue
rin1,11_ 1
- ..,,
, ' IN 6vir z L-
1350 i
-.` Mercer Island j
_1
-._ i
I I
,0 z•Z.r
—(
— 1_i
Newcastle \
51/ Pilfi /
ia.--
OEM I--1
-.
-1,1 1 - AIIIIIIIIIM
In 1 1211=." 4,15 -------___.,
IIIIIIIINIIIII I
Seattle
1=1111=1111.
TIMM g i
.41MI bits. '''',Iralk I , ___.
;.,. . ., t, .1....t.„._-• II=
_
- 111111
111111111iviFino-;it, 1.1rar
-,-,
,, , ......... ..... , •
aisir-7-41
Am Unincorporated King County
I ' , . Milligranilif ' ,-'11111Wiiii.1--\PI 4 Ill_rallididallia "ati _alio ; INNERA' ...mktilliku....m.-..411r1 fig 900
MINN V 11.22." 11IM ris iftliproi owl
,..„ 1 int ..... .,,e_L
, ... .....i ago aim NNE 1 ,
.. . ,
5,\\\ Ildramar West Hill Mar. 11111 PVIalitigiliitli IMIla a In " III
).---,. l.ftgr- ..-AvIlmtil, , !Am -) 0 livadreirito I Alija"'
ri1 datieh.%,. ._ , i 1 _ i,. - kr • i L 11 alIr.
(I' ' ';.1b,Ironf PION.--, IF t \ 11:11111IIIKT/OW'll'illi AMIKERILTIValgr ,--"ism
.., . .....,
- --.14migiii 01._,,__Mlii liopilf# - I 1 17. "i bWILIRIAmilifignt,-4 I "ittlg
'-q11.11111414.1, --- 1011111114 (-! '
Aim° -- /17-24 aana-nuu i -
c4)p
lig A.UP ilr. IR
ig nun I i
...., ....r....... Ina vim __..)
gp
••ier,etomitirgosil K4 aro fir , . 1 ,
-cmzettvilowni, lk t*,
et. , ou laminp igh , -..p.
11illme -7-',...,.. ET East Plateau
MI
vrillingt, Aiyintro oi _ 0. ,,,,
.11011....t...1,000. Ilktimp.. on a- an n ,
_,, g. ci
• wriiii11111 fil 11 11116,4
.:_,„„,....mir ..R.,0 ,..„44. %.`4..'
• ,,,
-., .
v.: I All".17154
v
53 1: ,.,...,*
allr 1111!al Inums i‘teidli ii. 4 otil - "S.iraillibk'S. 41116"R' '
Tukwila Ali . :, 41 ....... .... ..,.........z...7;;411,
Pill IF ilio- 64311.46
( .4 %ill ' '' jilr1.11Thrillr& IF att rgi
eirtml
11111 'lib theirkillirlria"3-4 I, wki
r 111114M1 17=-7 '-
0.1....... „v., 1.71
_____Iitt,, Fasirwood a ainli;fr
. 1:44‘11%;•=il _11111 %PO
0 1/11f go i Ph; Bianaidkitih- I edi
gr k.,
c ne . 4.411F Ili I .1'1111 - r. %dr
1 A.K0 141/11111 ' k- '1143') 4 141 1
NIV tritifoXin" i
) \.) 1 41 lendmit'lII
\gj
- mu
_UM ao-4-"' miki g 22
:rig ills'. V
/
Aft' n-k
I i 1 MI
) ..- il 1
41_ 1
0
CI"1 I
Kent .
id 1 I -E*r I
Unincorporated King County
,-I
.1111 Renton City Limits
1
(31 o ,
0.5 1
I Renton Potential
I I Miles is) I Annexation Areas (PAA)
Source:City of Renton,2019
•
Annexations Since GMA (April, 1 990)
1
Bellevue -1
' Mercer Island ( �)-J
/
y Newcastle \
I i
4275 r----,,
I
L_-1
I
Seattle 5318 I
5543 N
,� 5138 O
P o
h
M
w
506
5 Unincorporated King County
r
0 481 sue
5147\
4383 5161 0
.o
^
West Hill r 5203 5459 ••
t;` 4924
4760
r ..
5484 m sns
5073163 4ml$•
4891 456454 454 5140 R
sn 5722
East Plateau
t.
5398
5243 QI----L-4 /--L
Tukwila
565 ik
5373
I
7
I....
`_ a Fairwood
5327
C1 �--
SeaTac II Unincorporated King County
I
s2os
I
i 5301._+r
� Kent �1 ce-SII
%A \-L1
IICIRenton,2Ol95
D City Limits •4642,11/27/1996,Hughes WS 5074,5/26/2004,Carlo MI 5236,5/24/2007,Hudson IN 5484,10/14/2009,Earlington
Q Potential Annexation Areas(PAA) •4684,11/5/1997,Hoffman •5092,9/22/2004,Tydico MI 5243,1/14/2007,Maplewood Addition MI 5488,10/30/2009,Duvall South
4760,4/21/1998,East Renton Plateau NI 5096,11/2/2004,Johnson 5261,3/15/2007,Perkins 11111 5543,8/1/2010,Sierra Heights Elementary
Annexation History(Since GMA Adoption) IIII 4780,5/19/1999,Davis NI 5138,6/1/2005,Honey Creek III 5283,6/11/2007,Leitch I■5545,8/1/2010,Maplewood Heights Element,
Ordinance Nbr,Effective Date,Annexation III 4819,1 2/15/1999,Smith III 5140,6/1/2005,Maplewood East 5293,7/30/2007,Aster Park 111 5552,11/7/2010,Kendall
3163,10/24/1997,18F Investment 4829,2/16/2000,Morrison 5142,6/1/2005,Merritt I IN 5301,10/22/2007,Anthone 1111 5631,11/13/2011,Tess
4275,7/29/1990,Duncan IIII 4876,12/13/2000,Knight IN 5147,7/4/2005,Wedgewood Lane M 5315,12/24/2007,Marshall Ell 5632,11/20/201 1,Gaile
I.4318,7/21/1991,Shurgard IIIII 4891,2/21/2001,Merlin Empire Estates 5161,11/27/2005,Pork Terrace IIII 5318,4/16/2008,Merrit II 5655,4/1/2012,Fairlane Woods
4337,1/25/1992,Honey Creek Ridge 4918,10/24/2001,Lee •5171,1/8/2006,Mosier II 5327,3/1/2008,Benson Hill IIII 5665,7/4/2012,Windstone V
•4383,12/16/1992,Senescu •4924,12/5/2001,Piele III 5175,12/21/2005,Lindberg IIII 5373,6/9/2008,AQUA BARN I♦571 3,4/30/2014,Maertins
•4476,10/26/1994,Winsper IIII 5012,6/18/2003,Vuong 5203,5/3/2006,H uiam oq li 5398,8/11/2008,liberty IN 5719,8/17/2014,Alpine Nursery
In 4510,5/3/1995,Stonegate lid 5041,12/10/2003,Falk 5205,5/3/2006,Falk II 1111 5447,4 10 2009,S brook Terrace
M 4564,1 2 1 1 1995,Holman / / p^ng � 5722,9/24/2014,Trace Matthew
/ / •5064,3/24/2004,Bales •5208,6/18/2006,Akers Farms 5456,5/31/2009,MacKay IIII 5857,10/15/2017,Tim D
4579,2/14/1996,Anmarco iN 5068,4/28/2004,Stoneridge N 5223,11/19/2006,Querin II IM 5459,7/5/2009,Shamrock 5879,4/8/2018,Eric Reeler II
(IiIID Potential Annexation Areas & School Districts
Bellevue School i
District Bellevue _
-ri
Mercer Island ' —� L,
School District
Mercer Island I r( ) _ J
l �- Iii
Newcastle — `
a -
" inIN I
21 -
t ill S os 1
i
Seattle
1108
- vl PAINz I: _7 District
74/kI Issaquah School
.i—ji.-
Seattle School +�
\ IriI�l�1p,,., �1 1�1 ' -1 imrt.�� District
er,
f Iwo
�`_■� C v }it 1�•: i P
r
?,,, .. �`® Unincorporated King County
14,-,•_.„.„:„,„,,_ ... i, ,. , \ ,4i�i �.1111/,..27141, NI" Klima _ li
>� ' At
lillll'— _ lr '1111=� / - ✓ � e `ilE 11nutLI il ILL
i�./i01111 U. - C in ��
4t1 . 4ehtonSchoo �District ~' 1 1
cam`trill I 4 — --
Tukwila T pnew �����inn 1 —iii ( —
41,
tavivillimpriow,. / 11111 - ,.. -x
Il -silk" r r: IMIlirIg
...�■ ,.r.1111 1 �� �(I �...
Tukwila School I� „'C Ftt_. �`A
���
District — r 1 � .■• �'•^ om• • shoo
��'' �'�(i"'al �r� �� District
it 1.6.111112,3,,e,i, , , , _,
. _
) L... , 'I ail `JIlE "\ .Irwaa• . t
IIP NI F_ : l �
-, r, 1 i JE---L---34iviows't
,, A .
...41.,,, I
; ! . \,..... 1.,a
hn— I . i'
1 - -?1- 1 , !!
' ul "1 �
' IL
co • Unincorporated King Co,;ntI
,4 1 ^ I Kent School "
District
Ilill Renton City Limits
Kent Renton Potential
Annexation Areas (PAA)
Oo o.s 1 0 i Renton School District
I I I Miles , NMOther School Districts
Source:City of Renton,2019
Potential Annexation Areas & Sewer Districts
I*sor
at 1130
4 pBellevue -
a �C ,� L I rcll�I_ I
Wilt 11 L,
Mercer Island ]
IA Newcastle
r-
i All - Coal Creek
,. ....i. _i,
L
Seattle �� aos
l"ibI1tlA i‘l'lj0 f1ii111t1nk.5l-Il1i1-1 fid1i'LiE,lf-r1_11Ail4kmMC1,il i 4g1.lr.-.*.•1roffRie11 1a1l11tr1y fii.r1lj6 �XP w,k'iM1 r e��
viMrIi"bulaii,,lVi r;piI,tN4.ftr1N_1a1 iiii 1Ik1:Nrdo iiO4lb%fiil.1osi
dirt:.„
• �� '.,, �� �� e. Unincorporated Kin Couni
ale z. ars* +rA�', wi 900
ai
IilM
;•_!�����..! -- ' ; � ` li1111111�IIII_•.+7s�`' ����ie �'A _ ,lE� �..
,t.g.e,-, ,4,,,k eo,1 l7nekw0w4 A9i=401
pm))i.t4 l.g*c4..."a‘:4•u1•,N u„l ii,rr&g
nt ill a,ttgiNsi.Ni.....r R34El'A a.L E:.o.,l.l2L,0
v:1..iiE k,
'o pt. . 1101IIII111111= r�� t -. ��ri" . 1 r1 2r
;t.,11,
un_Ii
Tukwila i T� `` w,�/llull2 m IPpii%.t0fIo)1k,3 4 0."t0,\gPi.)-"
,:L 17
: ll
; AK.
II5414
-'14010-:0111110.41&P' ' L Iv iiik „4,.., ifk•
12 Tukwila • • ` : `-I / _ ® y.
233j4 aq v
IAA
t Y _
) II
,,„
T r:ntit�'Ir : 1 ;4
Air ir,„ 0 - ... "614 � llijlij' 7
.i+ "lee r
■ r' j' MI
9it�� �1� �t��yy
Ai
"is
CD
?I L` , 'pil
,` it�i
�,�1, � i
' Soos Cre k Unincorporated King * unty
a ‘ k, ,Kent . °��
/ Renton City Limits
Na Kent Renton Potential
Annexation Areas (PAA)
O 0 0.5 1 ® IIM Renton Sewer District
I I Miles
I= Other Sewer Districts
Source:City of Renton,2019
PLANNED GROWTH
Background:
• The City's Business Plan states that the city supports planned growth by fostering development of
vibrant, sustainable, attractive, mixed-use neighborhoods in urban centers.
• The City has accepted responsibility for planning for 14,050 new household and 28,755 new jobs by
2035 as identified in the King County household and employment growth targets(attached).
• According to Buildable Lands analysis (attached), which evaluates the number of households the
City can accommodate based on current zoning, the City has the capacity to accommodate 15,351
new households.
• Recent projections from the Puget Sound Regional Council (PSRC) indicate the region needs to plan
for 1.8 million more people and 1.2 million more jobs by 2050.
• Since the adoption of Growth Management Act(GMA),the State has put significant limitations on
the authority of cities to tax residential development.
o Generally, residential growth no longer pays in taxes the cost it requires for facilities and
services.
• When the GMA was adopted,there was an expectation that the State would provide additional
funding for infrastructure to ensure adequate facilities were in place at the time of development.
This has not occurred.There have been mixed results with state investments.
Comprehensive Plan Update and Development Regulations Amendments:
• The City has adopted several amendments to the development regulations that are impacting
the look and feel of density, in single family residential zones in particular. In some cases,the
amendments have reduced the number of lots a parcel can be subdivided into. These items
include:
o Tree retention.Trees that are retained as part of a subdivision that are not located on a
residential lot are required to be placed in tracts. This is a new requirement. It has in some
cases reduced the number of lots developed because tracts are not a buildable area.
o Minimum lot sizes and setbacks. In the R-4 zone, minimum lot size was increased from
8,000 to 9,000 square feet. Additionally, the side setback was increased from 5 feet to a
combined 20 feet. In the R-8 zone, the minimum lot size was standardized to 5,000 square
feet. Previously, subdivisions of parcels larger than 1 acre were allowed 4,500 square foot
minimum lot sizes. Additionally, in the R-8 zone the front setback increased from 15 feet to
20 feet and the side setback increased from 5 feet to a combined 15 feet. In these two
zones,these standards, in particular the increased minimum lot size in R-4, have in some
cases reduced the number of lots that can be developed in a subdivision.
• A new single-family residential zone was created, R-6.This zone improved the range of options
available for zoning (previously zoning went from R-4 to R-8, a doubling of density). It also
serves as a transition between the lower density residential zones and the smaller lot
development that is associated with R-8 development. Many areas(portions of Kennydale,
Highlands, and Cascade neighborhoods)that are largely built out with R-6 zone lot sizes (7,000
square feet)were rezoned from R-8 to R-6.
• In response to community desire to preserve single-family character, rezoned much of South
Renton from RMT(Residential Multi-Family Traditional)—35 dwelling units per acre, RMU
(Residential Multi-Family Urban)—75 dwelling units per acre, and/or CD (Center Downtown)—
100 dwelling units per acre to R-14.
• RMF zoned areas without existing multi-family development or with predominant multi-family
development in the area were rezoned to lower density zones (R-8 or R-10). Several areas with
CA zoning were rezoned to lower density zones; and the maximum density in East Plateau and
Kennydale were reduced to 30 dwelling units per acre. Multi-family residential development is
no longer allowed in the CA zone in Benson and Talbot.
• With these changes, high density multi-family has been focused into areas where: 1) adequate
planning and infrastructure exist or have been planned for and 2) where it will leverage
redevelopment of existing antiquated housing or commercial buildings.
• The CO (Commercial Office) zone was amended to allow multi-family development when it is in
close proximity to significant transportation infrastructure (for example, in the Longacres area
near the Sounder station). This creates an opportunity to create Transit Oriented Developments
where significant employment areas also have housing.
• Bonus density criteria were amended to only allow density bonuses for providing affordable
housing.
Next Steps:
• Coordinate with King County to evaluate the Buildable Lands available in Renton.
• Participate in Countywide assessment and designation of Housing and Employment Growth
Targets.
• Continue to monitor land availability data.
• As Community Plans are developed, review zoning and land uses in the Plan area with the
community.
• Continue to plan and construct Capital Facilities and Transportation infrastructure in areas
where density is planned.
• Continue to coordinate with and represent Renton on the King County Growth Management
Policy Board, the PSRC, and the Sound Cities Association.
• Review and possibly comment on PSRC SEPA (attached).
• Participate in State (Legislature), regional (PSRC), and countywide planning bodies (SCA, GMPB)
to insure Renton vision for growth and development are consistent with the work products of
these bodies/organizations.
7--- 3 3 Cn` Cl) 71 -1:1
CD O D r ' j
13 pAw o = vcnwo &'i .icnwoFi? 3 p u) m = N3 x1
�, 3 w CO W c�' i i i (D 1 i 1 1 m d 7 CD 7. w N a m
I J ,7 CD + 1 1 1 _, O 3 �* O CO J Cr W Jr, O CO CO �7 CT co CD x CD O CO Q 0 7 N (n
• O
W f2 _ Q Q Q Q �7 O Q Q Q Q p C1 Q Of C C OJ O O
g N a Q a Q cow -0 0 nc�i `v a) w - o d v w c a d v O u =' P3c . m
- (D o E C C o -, O - Fd C) C) o o `� n n n n CD () 7 (D NCO CD 7 ° Z
�' m fD m m m m m m m m m m a �'• a - 7 No
2 CD O —
m m m m Fif V a° Nov ° < NJ D
_ r
N Fif 41 (D - 7 j (D 3 0
C 7 _ Duo • m m ° cD m
N CA N Cl
O:`W O. >y O N O) O CD Oy n .l a) C a G
O �I V �'.N O CD V CA O CT 0 C7 N ' Q ,� m
N
N U1 CD 'co 01 A Q W N CD -I 7
I-
, S U (DQ- 00
CD
_ _
O O W O D W CO CO W O y y y O a 7 (D 0 m
A O O -, W O -o C) (O -, CO �7 O CD Q 7
_O IV 0 Z
n S7 XI O n
_ (D !n
7 N n Q O O - 1 C
6 CC Cr 7 (p
�D -, 0 ,J00 CD p 3 < (n. N lD O
N W O A CJl O 03 V y 2 Cp 7 -0
0 Q) (n CD
sv c.71 O (O 3
7 o -I C
Cfg
' A O- OO -, O o A O v CyO ; 9
6 °a 0 O 0D O CD
7C N
- p) O O-'< O y
9 w � U) — Cl CD CD fn Q 7 (D
ed C71 N.) N G7 V 03 O W (J) /� 0 A Cn V 0 0 O CD N CO CO CO (n (Il N A W y C7 'Y O Q
•• 0o Co V A A A CA O W A Oo CA 0 V -, O j 0
a
ii
N !� Cr Ca) o
r" C'cri nN) OD V14 rnN rnLIiI
III c o&i CC • o m
V Ca) CO 10>N A W CA CT CO A A Fn' N (.0 '' 7
O Z
a C v n) y
7 �, 0
'C 1 7 it 7 O NCD ° Z
3 y
O� N A O N Co T O O CT O CO Co CA U1 -> SU C7 . K W 7 fA
CD �1 i 'co Co W CA C. Cn W (J1 A O �7 N W — -, a ='
N (O
O 7"O N C
(nv z z -o Z z Z Z z i 0 . 7) -o 77 ■ C N N N • 7
(D (D CD CCD (D C'D (D O O C N C/)
3 '•► •* Cn = C O O. 0 CA 0 OO 0
7. (D N.
�• Q a D N CD (D (D SC, O• cc N I) N C) pOj CO N
S.
• 7 ^► C � v CD
C C 7 �2 CO n7 D x 7 N W iZ
C co
(c I L� 1/3 �' y (gyp a
(D CD , W U) C C a O 3 < 2 fl O 07 -< N• . (D
0 7 � • tQ C C a CD
C ,� D NO j in N ,�� C 7 ' O. (D co su °
;�, O O (D 0 7 71 O t1 }� a -0 7
N V N -1 N X N N of - to N 11 • p7 X O
0 w o D 3 . o coO a 3 N o) c 1 a) - v
N co CD O N N r. k �"r• O 0 -, W .YO O, O -°
N r4. mi. .-o N N CD N N CD Q 0o O co (.T V - 7
O O- o CD ' O w (D �.
Q
N v 0)
°) co o v7 s
� . N 3 0oW - V O $ O
N W 0 CD "co Ui N 3 C . O (a C
N Oo (J) n Q Cn 0D V ti 7 fl) = S .
CO W N (� Co 0 O p N K • a 7
....... A (Ji C...) 0) N C D a CO
e CD 0 .......a....... ......� _
i
115.
i t 11 NC 7 0
.a- N A co N co- C co
3 A 0 O O C. V {G
fa N ci, 33� 3 3
3
CM
A 0 Co V CD CD CD
0 CO CO CO 7
.) 3 3 3
O)i CD &O M co CD
' -'U) a0 e- .-• en
> N'M CD v O '4) r coO N M N N N
!' N CA t co 0) CC) CO CO O
CM d' 0.0
.- CD v CC) di CV O U5 Ct
W (aC U •
i+
O z >
o
i fa •
O O
U E �; s- o a
y y i M?en O , E
,-1- C
a)
• i 7 N
i N Iin N co N- !t e- �D Cp ti M O m
o COIN Cb J CO r` tD N M Co N co N
I-'N �O�pp) ,— ')1 Q M N OC') 03 It) CO 'X cc,
�4 y N CCO O l N 0 CO >
> U i ,- Y
Q QI o rS > > N
Z V
ro
a) ,al LA N _ MI
o o 0 0 0 0 0 E •E O 40 '� X
O CC) O lC) 0 Lf) O N O -C C 3
U a—ia—
N 0 C iA 2 2
lL I ■ ■ ■
C
Y0
Q
o ti
c o
j _ o v v
CO p Ci.
U 'NIO � CO O8 cc a0 > 7 a�
Ili Mi a) i (4
y i O ,- O ci O a) L 6
N
CL 7 '�iN N N O N X 'b
05 Q O : : 0_ C cc
> 0- 0 i 6 of ' as -
........... ... I p �p Z to CO 0 "O
8usul CO N g 8 O I A coO N- ca O COM COi v oZS
a) s- p0�) O O) O O ci co C`') O C'') C) CO S C
N CO C o N CO N N N u ++ +' 70 3
ut
R a) CC CO CDU
O N O C i^ o
O c co o a) X �O CO O O .
U cc a) m a-. -a m bC
No w `N- i `C C O) CO 0chi O) �i °�
CC(�) �pIn
U N i W (V N CC) r� Oi N O N cM Oi CV M Cn i 0) c00 O CA O
d , co 1 co_O 00 co rn a0 uo T C'.J C� N i (� M co
Q U CA i ,- N CV r N CV ( t M
° 0O O
0 z I a
i-. i
a = c < o 0
n- 3 rc m c N
o c
a `•' O • N
c O
la a a o Oo Fo- K Oo C id 0 d
c z. c
Q , U ".En 7 (n 7 o c co 7 o j N •.c x .0 Y
co o (J) rn l—
c _ o L`
C > C > _�C > c > O Cp a co col U ' V C6
J O C lL co a) — '- CO a) — p Ca a) — •y CC N rV C.) a)i Q a) C ~ a
Q U 2 c U � .0 c U -o 7 o c; c CL
-Ow olawoaamooz aCao0 oma) .a.,.a, 10 o VcU
W s'l— ( in 2 z a H N 3.Ci )i .E 2.i E D D y V d
0 --I6 d� ww pi i = a p o
7 = C7) Q) i a) 'C C6 .s .0 N
W C C 7i 7 .x ._ CO V .0 7 M
spooyaogg6io ash paxiw ls;ol�(;iO a . (n in 212 z 2 y�� T° pi Q N
'N Cr 0 0, �{ iH feed) o
...........
C) 1 I 0 K E K K Z z ...ni z < z ci ct) -n C....)
•--. x 1 I ,.. : T.< x i R (D CD
0 k) 0 CD CT -• -,
a)
1.) ai m r, co lo
0
0- 0- 0. CL. ; s• = ".. . 5 K 0 l , 3 cp 0 3
,s0 sr I co-I g. 30 ...0 c c ,- . cr 0_ 0 0.• X 0., 0- o 1 R.: a) c A".1 -
t...)
CI) CA • 0 c 3 0 cs,.. o c 5 3 i I ?.< 0 CD 0 cr Nj 0
o ... m = ca r.
4- ,i a) !,„•- , -I X <;--. 0 a) -, 0 Z ou yi. C -, ,ca
0
: sT CD . CL 0 0 7 W 0 [CLI ""••• CD Z M
Eu- aj a o i C a) --). 0. m'. 73
5
(1).i ! ..." .. ; NJ
< = ;..., -i CD .=.• 0- 0 CD 0
r ,gll ET ,..,Z 0 • .-• h< I--
CD i := (.0 •-• c) 5
...o. ET
..• CD- 1 0 - I-
t- ,g* r-- - Q. Z ri) -
•• 1= Z -. I
:..-.
.•'
• ::-* ,., CD IN3 AN •,.. G) g) (1) W 5 Z
. I CD W D a)
-I I ! • 0 i 0 .."- -1 --1
Cl)
- .4. 0) 1•3 - N.3 , -1 0 1 CL
CA 0111\3 -NI NJ 01 01 -NI _a CD 43 CD 01 i CCD0. ,.
: 0) N3 ''< 0 C
CO i CO I--.1 43 ••4 OD CO 1 00 63 :74: D •-• 0 01 0) 03 I u) 0.) 6,1 ,„‹ 7- Cl) 04: cn
CD I 43'--& A -, 4), 00, CA.) -A ..--- 0_ 43 CO --. CP [
: I W--0 '.. '"I
.PPP o •- o 1 P P > „......
(t) 1 so > p
_, (,) _,
-, CT .CA) . . '
E- C2 -1. -,
NI cn V) -h =: 5
_.... - > _. i 0 '.1 (D r--.`..< (D
i 0 i 0 -t -IL -Li o el 7-
•-••4 ry o.)
co Er
.P. CD 0 C..) i cc) ri) a,
i.....1 1 cr) co 0) 0) 0)I ••••.1 Co (D
...._, ! 0_ .4). C) io 'o) i - -. o 0
. h C)
a) n M
o o 5 . iti M
a) FL; Eu. m
•• • • I o tj o • 5
co :iv C.0 CI) CD CO 1•3 0) 9 a)-• i -I .....
0') ,0) -•‘• CD _, -u CD CD `.< > o_ 0
•. - :a. O :D. O ; (7). u) -•
.... -0
• 0 °
..•
..• m <7,
1:5 o a) c 13
i 0 -I c ry w
-0 - m
0 :
• Co , o--, 0 -•
CrQ :
. " D Z
:• - PP
n :
• Co izo 6 o 1 I ea - m-
O ..•
•. -• a) 5-_-). 73 a)
>
0 i
: 1 5 1". W (1) D.' Z
0 •'i I 7 E 0) CL) D
N.) I•3 0 cn '0 > Z - ,-, 0 D
0::I A i-‘•I DJ CD 0)CY) •-• A -, 0 -° ho ("I •-,i co c!D co CD
-• •• • 0') 0 • • .-1. Cll 0 M
8 co ..:_, • • • 0_ , - g
- 0 a)i 0) ry iv 0 " 00 0 I
C'TI:. .-•
. '
I I • M 0)
Fo ! 1 iv N.) IV N.) r...)! N.) 3 4) "
cr ; !cri cn al a. a, ol 9 0 °I a) E 0
,--J,. . . 0 01 -..., 0 -0 _., -.., ,:. ,1 go." 0
r-r ,,:0,....... ....... 0 - 5' - 0 -I
i 0!-1)• -1=- 4). 0 -I'• m. x- cD "0 (1) "<
__. _. _....
0 0 0 0 0, 0 ."< -0 n) (1)
w i o o o o o o to o oil cn CT 0 cD
I! It a) -, c' .?g " .- -0. 0 (D E
0.• [ a) ‘.< W m
• I Z
Cl)
5. 0 7
-I
n ", •
. .
'7 a) ry -- I CO I\-) CO CO .-..,i 0) -. N.) Co 0 1 _ I 4. .-. t -). -I . . 3 Cl)
o -0 P.rim ra) -.4 C) -, ! co ln 41. 0 Cr al c.,,) cr.) o) I a) a) 5
1-t CD o.)!-s•!CI) -,1 0) --.I CD1 CO ••-• --4 "4 h..) 03 0 CO I 141/ a 0 Fp, ..z
,
cD --.1 01 i.D.. 03 al N.) cia 1 CD 0') C.) CD io :a. crt 1 '
k.) c 0
A
z 1- 1-
13 4.... c- 0 . I 1 1 rn CO u)
c 5 i fo, o c'D cD cD ci 0 --1 5' II --, N...) •
" so !c " ,-. cr cr 0 Cl psj • ! 0 p CD 0)
-0 - cn 1%.1 > , 0 0
E n3 i 3 -.a 6 0 G.)
(I) CA i 0 C .-.
7-• N.) c P..) 0 < CD
-1.!(D 0- 5. u., c CT cr i m Z•• -1 ED cn 0 " MI ''C ai 0 cp
0
0 ....
=*1 ,.,c-i FS Cu -I 66. cu. 91 r4) 'a ra-• ' (D C- 7' I CD 0_
! -0 go D 0'-'t O, ( = 7 3 -•
5 5 ="- •• =- . C... ,-.• O) I
ri. (D =h Cl)
5 1 g. > 5 I I> n) -I (1)
0 Fp p: cD 0 ! !, p a) c-4. c
-h cr u) tO !61 Q n o D
e•-•,- M .-..-
co 2) i CD ,-1. ....1 p„, Q "I '0
c-) 0 ID 0
i0. ..... w -g. 0 i a) a,-„„
Ct) )13 :.. - I).) -, -1 CD i I :4, . E
.-• ci si)
:-I at
0 c- --- -i: 0(.0 a,) ., a)la) K.)..,...... Q. 3- n-
-• A:I o -). a) -8 re,•-• D.,-, cz K., a) CY 7
hi •-...
.•:‹+ %.< I 3 t) (0 0 0_ (13 ,, p (Di' -1 $.11 cji CD 0 I r-- 0
• -
I ED 1•3 CD ra c< i cD .., a
o
'''1 .... -.D. --4 Cr I I N) 0 W X
I cr o cr) r.) = co --.1 (3) -, Ci) cz)
0 w c 43 I'.3 0 cn oo r‘) 0) CD
o CO E 0_
- -1 ,-. I + 0)
• o ...... o co 2 - :
• DI , ,-.-
,
-x 0) o IV - ,-* 0 0 7- 0
=, I • •••-•• ,ry , - CD
61 . c.ri a 0 .
. , 1 co ,,,1 oc-1 a 1%3°
cr!c m c
u) (I) co
•P -• CD i 03 N.) - 0 I.- C.) NI' u) :u) 0 u) 0 CD
V
CD 0 co 1 0 * (0 '0 (...) --4 * ri• ...). -. < n
43 K3
...i • 0) co 0 to 0
--, o
tv if') M o -• = -11
0
0) 3 , (1) i Zi
K) o
CD
CD Z 1 a) = m
ID iD - N.)co cri c
- co r.
so 0.1 cr) 0
C.I1 Is.) .< ,,-,. 5 co ED Z
w co w co K.) -4).Ofq L;p o 0 CO, -,1 7 K.) Ko -NI II.
CD 0 0 (/) CO '03 C.0 tO 6 i ID
0
o 7 ••••/ 0 •••1 CO 0 0
---1 1 7 •-•.,
-I=. ,-o Z
Exhibit 2. King County Growth Targets (2006-2031) Compared to 2007 Capacity
Regional Geography PAA Housing Housing +/- Employment PAA Emp. Employment +/-
City/Subarea Housing Target Target Capacity ? Target Target Capacity ?
Net New Units Net New lints Net New Units Net New Jobs Net New Jobs Net New Jobs
2006-2031 2006-2031 2006,from BLR 2006-2031 2006-2031 2006,from BLR
Metropolitan Cities
Bellevue 17,000 290 13,670 53,000 49,100 -
Seattle 86,000 128,900 111 146,700 254,900 If
Total 103,000 142,570 199,700 304,000
Core Cities
Auburn 9,620 9,190 - 19,350 - 17,760 -
Bothell 3,000 810 2,860 - 4,800 200 6,040 4
Burien 4,440 3,170 4,960 3,260
Federal Way 8,100 2,390 5,670 . 12,300 290 8,860
Kent 9,270 90 9,080 - 13,280 210 12,540 111
Kirkland 8,570 - 6,380 20,850 - 12,600
Redmond 10,200 640 8,99041 23,000 25,075 111
Renton 14,835 3,895 16,250 29,000 470 29,550
SeaTac 5,800 5,240 - 25,300 17,730
Tukwila 4,800 50 3,490 . 15,500 2,050 16,200
Total 78,635 70,320 168,340 149,615
Larger Cities
Des Moines 3,000 3,300 3 5,000 3,950
Issaquah 5,750 290 6,900 3I 20,000 19,100
Kenmore 3,500 5,020 ;`4t 3,000 3,050
Maple Valley 1,800 1,060 2,380 Y 2,000 3,770 II
Mercer Island 2,000 1,760 = 1,000 820
Sammamish 4,000 350 3,740 - 1,800 -
Shoreline 5,000 6,890 . 4 5,000 3,490
Woodinville 3,000 _ 2,1401l 5,000 3,770
Total 28,050 32,130 42,800 37,950
Small Cities
Algona 190 320 4 210 580 4 I
Beaux Arts 3 5 4 3 - ?
Black Diamond 1,900 4,270 'V 1,050 4,700 4
Carnation 330 800 4 370 1,570 4
Clyde Hill 10 25 4 - - 4
Covington 1,470 3,300 4 1,320 3,330 4
Duvall 1,140 2,650 J 840 1,600 4
Enumclaw 1,425 3,250 4 735 1,790 4
Hunts Point 1 1 4 - - d
Lake Forest Park 475 675 ' 4 210 380 4
Medina 19 40 3 - - 4
Milton 50 90 420 4 160 2,470 4
Newcastle 1,200 1,500 I/ 735 870
Normandy Park 120 275 4 65 170 4
North Bend 665 1,600 4 1,050 7,760 4
Pacific 285 135 560 11 370 350 -
Skykomish 10 35 41 - -
Snoqualmie 1,615 3,480 4 1,050 900
Yarrow Point 14 35 11 - -
Total 10,922 23,241 8,168 26,470
Urban Unincorporated
Total 12,470 20,190 4 9,060 9,200 4 I
King County UGA Total 233,077 288,451 428,068 527,235
The base year for these Targets is 2006.As cities annex territory,PAA targets Key: Sufficient capacity 4 'capacity in 2007 BLR
shift into Targets column. meets target
Adjustments to Burien,Kent&Kirkland targets have been made to account for Slight shortfall - less than 10%short
2010 and 2011 annexations. of target
King County Growth Targets Committee,Growth Management Pbnnng Councl,August Substantial shortfall-more than 10%short
2009.Adjusted June2011 of target
July 23, 2014 King County Buildable Lands Report 2014 Page 13
a
S 0 C
•
•
� ✓ .
, ••y
k
, •
• �
Draft SEIS Open Houses
We need your input! PSRC will be seeking comments in March 2019 on the Draft Supplemental
Environment Impact Statement (SETS) for VISION 2050, the region's long-range plan to keep the central
Puget Sound region healthy and vibrant as it grows.
The SEIS reviews the environmental effects of three regional growth alternatives that distribute growth
in unique patterns throughout the region.
Drop in to an open house to learn more about the alternatives and join the regional conversation:
Tuesday, March 12 / 4-6PM / Edmonds City Hall
121 5'h Avenue N, Edmonds, 98020
Wednesday, March 13 / 4-6PM / South Tacoma Public Library As the region prepares
3411 S 56'h Street, Tacoma, 98409 to add more people and
Monday, March 18 / 4-6PM / Bothell Police Community Room more jobs in the coming
18410 1015'Avenue NE, Bothell, 98011 decades — about 1.8
Tuesday, March 19 / 4-6PM / Bremerton City Council Chambers million more people by
345 6'h Sreet, #600, Bremerton, 98377 2050 —VISION 2050
Thursday, March 21 / 12-2PM/ PSRC Boardroom
1011 Western Avenue, Suite 500, Seattle, 98104 will provide a guide for
sustaining a healthy
Can't attend an open house in person? Participate online environment, thriving
at https://www.psrc.oro/.
communities, and a
For more information, please email VISI0N2050@psrc.org, strong economy.
call 206-464-7090, or visit https://www.psrc.ora/vision. I -'
Puget Sound Regional Council 1011 Western Avenue,Suite 500 * Seattle,WA 98104-1035 . 206-464-7090 psrc.org • January 2019
Renton
VISION MISSION The City of Renton, in partnership and communication
with residents, businesses, and schools, is dedicated to:
Renton:The center
of opportunity in Providing a safe, healthy, welcoming atmosphere where people choose to live
the Puget Sound Promoting economic vitality and strategically positioning Renton for the future
Region where Supporting planned growth and influencing decisions that impact the city
families and
businesses thrive Building an inclusive informed city with opportunities for all
Meeting service demands through high quality customer service, innovation,
a positive work environment, and a commitment to excellence
2019-2024 GOALS
ff
,4\„.v , i 0 .t - w- , I tr itz *_...,
a:
i
_ _ _1.! -- _ --, 1 lillf • A
Provide a safe, Promote economic Support planned Building an inclusive Meet service demands
healthy,vibrant vitality and strategically growth and influence informed city with and provide high
community position Renton for decisions that impact opportunities for all quality customer
• Promote safety,health, the future the city service
Y • Improve access to city
and security through • Promote Renton as the • Foster development services,programs and ■ Plan,develop,and
effective communication progressive,opportunity- of vibrant,sustainable, employment,and make maintain quality services,
and service delivery rich city in the Puget attractive,mixed-use residents and businesses infrastructure,and
• Facilitate successful Sound region neighborhoods in urban aware of opportunities amenities
neighborhoods through • Capitalize on centers to be involved with their • Prioritize services at
community involvement opportunities through • Uphold a high standard community levels that can be sustained
• Encourage and partner bold and creative of design and property ■ Build connections with by revenue
in the development of economic development maintenance ALL communities that
strategies reflect the breadth and • Retain a skilled
quality housing choices ■ Advocate Renton's workforce by making
for people of all ages and richness of the diversity
p P 9 ■ Recruit and retain interests through state and in our cit Renton the municipal
income levels businesses to ensure federal lobbying efforts, y employer of choice
• Promote a walkable, a dynamic,diversified regional partnerships and ■ Promote understanding
pedestrian and bicycle- employment base other organizations and appreciation of ■ Develop and maintain
our diversit throu h collaborative partnerships
friendly city with complete ■ Nurture ■ Pursue transportation y g and investment strategies
celebrations and festivals
streets,trails,and
entrepreneurship and other regional that improve services
connections between and foster successful improvements and services • Provide critical and
neighborhoods and relevant information on a • Respond to growing
g partnerships with that improve quality of life
community focal points businesses and timely basis and facilitate service demands through
• Balance development partnerships,innovation,
• Provide opportunities community leaders with environmental two-way dialogue between and outcome management
city government and the
for communities to be g
■ Leverage public/ protection community
better prepared for private resources to
emergencies focus development
on economic centers •
RENTON. AHEAD OF THE CURVE.