Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
K.C. County-wide Planning Volume 2 (8/10/1992)
*re •ftwa CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON RESOLUTION NO. 3952 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON, RATIFYING AN AMENDMENT TO THE COUNTYWIDE PLANNING POLICIES TO ADOPT THE 2007 BUILDABLE LANDS REPORT. WHEREAS, the Growth Management Act, RCW 36.70A.210 mandates the development and adoption of Countywide Planning Policies for King County; and WHEREAS, King County, the City of Seattle, the City of Bellevue, and the Suburban Cities of King County have met jointly as the Growth Management Planning Council (GMPC) to develop and recommend Countywide Planning Policies; and WHEREAS, the City of Renton has ratified the Countywide Planning Policies and subsequent amendments; and WHEREAS, Countywide Planning Policy FW-1 Step 9 provides for an amendment process to change the Planning Policies as may be necessary from time to time; and WHEREAS, on April 14, 2008, the Metropolitan King County Council adopted Ordinance 16056 ratifying the proposed amendment to the King County Countywide Planning Policies which recognizes the 2007 King County Buildable Lands Report and its findings; and WHEREAS, the City of Renton has completed a review and evaluation of Buildable Lands consistent with the requirements of RCW 36.70A.215; and WHEREAS, the findings of the review and evaluation for the City of Renton have been published in the 2007 King County Buildable Lands Report; and WHEREAS, the findings of the 2007 Buildable Lands Report indicate that the City of Renton has sufficient capacity, based on actual densities achieved during the most recent 5-year 1 111.9 RESOLUTION NO. 395740110 review period, to accommodate household and job growth targeted for the remainder of the current 20-year planning period; NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON, DOES RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS: SECTION I. The above findings are true and correct in all respects. SECTION II. The Findings of King County Ordinance 16056 pertinent to the 2007 Buildable Lands Report are adopted by reference. SECTION III. Motion 07-03 of the Growth Management Planning Council of King County is hereby ratified. SECTION IV. With this ratification, the 2007 King County Buildable Lands Report is recognized as complete in meeting the countywide and city reporting requirements of RCW 36.70A.21 5 and its findings are recognized as the basis for any future measures that the City of Renton may need to adopt in order to comply with this section. PASSED BY THE CITY COUNCIL this 16th day of June , 2008. l624-4 Z),CZg ) Bonnie I. Walton, City Clerk APPROVED BY THE MAYOR this 16th day of June , 2008. Dents Law, Mayor 2 „�,,► RESOLUTION NO. 3 95 2 v.e Approved as to form: Lawrence J. Warren, City Attorney RES.1346:6/2/08:scr • Jun (16,2008 err'' Renton City Council Minutes Nod Page 200 • Council Meeting Minutes of Approval of Council meeting minutes of 6/9/2008. Council concur. 6/9/2008 AJLS: City of Renton Business Administrative,Judicial, and Legal Services Department recommended Plan, 2009-2014 acceptance of the 2009-2014 City of Renton Business Plan. Council concur. (See page 202 for resolution.) CAG: 08-068, North City Clerk reported bid opening on 5/28/2008 for CAG-08-068,North Highlands Neighborhood Highlands Neighborhood Center Roof Replacement project; eight bids; Center Roof Replacement, engineer's estimate$139,000; and submitted staff recommendation to award the Olympic Roofing& Remodel contract to low bidder, Olympic Roof& Remodel, LLC, in the amount of $74,556. Council concur. Community Services: Ron Community Services Department requested authorization to apply for a Regis Park, Washington $500,000 matching grant from the Washington Wildlife Recreation Program for Wildlife Recreation Program capital improvements at Ron Regis Park. Refer to Finance Committee. Grant Human Resources: New Human Resources and Risk Management Department requested approval to hire Administrative Assistant a new Administrative Assistant position, and approval of the related 2008 Position Budget amendment. Refer to Finance Committee. Transportation: I-405 (at Transportation Systems Division recommended approval of a memorandum of Talbot Rd S) Cooperative understanding with the Washington State Department of Transportation Traffic Signal Operation, regarding the cooperative operation of traffic signals at the I-405 ramp located WSDOT at Talbot Rd. S. Refer to Transportation(Aviation)Committee. MOVED BY PALMER, SECONDED BY PERSSON, COUNCIL APPROVE THE CONSENT AGENDA AS AMENDED TO REMOVE ITEM 6.d. FOR SEPARATE CONSIDERATION. CARRIED. Separate Consideration Item City Clerk reported bid opening on 5/28/2008 for CAG-08-071, City Shops 6.d. Buildings A-2, B, and C Roof Replacement project; seven bids; engineer's CAG: 08-071, City Shops estimate $220,000; and submitted staff recommendation to award the contract to Buildings A-2, B, &C Roof low bidder, Krueger Sheet Metal, Co., in the amount of$246,810.88. Refer to Replacement, Krueger Sheet Finance Committee for discussion of funding. Council concur. Metal Noting that the contract amount is approximately $1,800 over budget, Councilmember Persson stated that the item did not need to be referred to the Finance Committee. MOVED BY PERSSON, SECONDED BY BRIERE, COUNCIL CONCUR IN CONSENT AGENDA ITEM 6.d. CARRIED. UNFINISHED BUSINESS Transportation(Aviation) Committee Vice-Chair Persson presented a report Transportation (Aviation) recommending concurrence in the staff recommendation to authorize the Mayor Committee and City Clerk to execute the proposed construction agreement with Puget Transportation: Duvall Ave Sound Energy in the amount of$170,240, to provide underground utility NE Reconstruction Utility conversion on the Duvall Ave. NE Widening Project. MOVED BY PERSSON, Conversion, Puget Sound SECONDED BY ZWICKER, COUNCIL CONCUR IN THE COMMITTEE Energy REPORT. CARRIED. Planning & Development Planning and Development Committee Chair Parker presented a report Committee recommending concurrence in the staff recommendation to adopt a resolution Planning: 2007 Buildable ratifying the Growth Management Planning Council Motion 07-03. Motion 07- Lands Amendment, 03 amends the Countywide Planning Policies by including the Buildable Lands Countywide Planning Policies Report as an appendix, recognizes the completion of the 2007 King County Buildable Lands Report,and notes its findings. MOVED BY PARKER, SECONDED BY ZWICKER, COUNCIL CONCUR IN THE COMMITTEE REPORT. CARRIED. (See page 202 for resolution.) APPROVED BY CITY COUNCIL Date 6-/6-aoor PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT COMMITTEE COMMITTEE REPORT June 16,2008 Amendment to King County Countywide Planning Policies (Referred June 9, 2008) The Planning and Development Committee recommends concurrence in the staff recommendation to adopt a resolution ratifying the Growth Management Planning Council Motion 07-03. Motion 07-03 amends the Countywide Planning Policies by including the Buildable Lands Report as an appendix, recognizes the completion of the 2007 King County Buildable Lands Report and notes its findings. mg arker, Chair Rich Zwicker, Vice air Greg Taylor, Member cc: Alex Pietsch Rebecca Lind June 16,2008 Renton City Council Minutes Page 202 Responding to an inquiry by Councilmember Briere, Community and Economic Development Administrator Pietsch stated that produce sales are specifically exempted from local zoning by the State legislature, cannot be regulated at the local level, and are allowed throughout the City. *MOTION CARRIED. Community Services Community Services Committee Chair Briere presented a report recommending Committee concurrence in the staff recommendation to approve Mayor Law's appointment Appointment: Knickerbocker, of Jennifer Knickerbocker to the Advisory Commission on Diversity to fill an Advisory Commission on unexpired term expiring on 12/31/2009 (position previously held by Erica Diversity Rehberg).* Councilmember Briere introduced Ms. Knickerbocker, who was present in the audience, noted her impressive résumé, and remarked that all Advisory Commission on Diversity positions are filled. Mayor Law thanked Ms. Knickerbocker for her willingness to serve on the commission. *MOVED BY BRIERE, SECONDED BY ZWICKER, COUNCIL CONCUR IN THE COMMITTEE REPORT. CARRIED. RESOLUTIONS AND The following resolutions were presented for reading and adoption: ORDINANCES Resolution #3951 A resolution was read adopting the 2009-2014 City of Renton Business Plan. AJLS: City of Renton Business MOVED BY PALMER, SECONDED BY PERSSON, COUNCIL ADOPT Plan, 2009-2014 THE RESOLUTION AS READ. CARRIED. Resolution #3952 A resolution was read ratifying an amendment to the Countywide Planning Planning: 2007 Buildable Policies to adopt the 2007 Buildable Lands report. MOVED BY PARKER, Lands Amendment, SECONDED BY ZWICKER, COUNCIL ADOPT THE RESOLUTION AS Countywide Planning Policies READ. CARRIED. The following ordinances were presented for first reading and referred to the Council meeting of 6/23/2008 for second and final reading: Planning: Development An ordinance was read amending Chapter 2, Zoning Districts- Uses and Regulations (Title IV) 2006 Standards; and Chapter 11, Definitions, of Title IV(Development Regulations) Docket Review of City Code to amend the regulations regarding fast food restaurants and office and conference uses; and adding a definition of fast food restaurant and amending the definition of drive-in/drive-through retail or service. MOVED BY PARKER, SECONDED BY ZWICKER, COUNCIL REFER THE ORDINANCE FOR SECOND AND FINAL READING ON 6/23/2008. CARRIED. Rezone: Hudson Annexation An ordinance was read changing the zoning classification of certain property Property, R-10 to CN (formerly the Hudson Annexation area)within the City of Renton from Residential Ten Dwelling Units per acre (R-10)to Commercial Neighborhood (CN). MOVED BY PARKER, SECONDED BY ZWICKER, COUNCIL REFER THE ORDINANCE FOR SECOND AND FINAL READING ON 6/23/2008. CARRIED. Rezone: Hudson Annexation An ordinance was read changing the zoning classification of certain property Property, R-10 to R-14 (formerly the Hudson Annexation area) within the City of Renton from Residential Ten Dwelling Units per acre (R-10) to Residential Fourteen Dwelling Units per acre (R-14). MOVED BY PARKER, SECONDED BY ZWICKER, COUNCIL REFER THE ORDINANCE FOR SECOND AND FINAL READING ON 6/23/2008. CARRIED. CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON RESOLUTION NO. 3 8 8 6 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON RATIFYING AMENDMENTS TO THE COUNTYWIDE PLANNING POLICIES. WHEREAS, the Growth Management Act, RCW 36.70A.210 mandates the development and adoption of Countrywide Planning Policies for King County; and WHEREAS, King County, the City of Seattle, the City of Bellevue and the Suburban Cities of King County have met jointly as the Growth Management Planning Council (GMP) to develop and recommend Countywide Planning Policies; and WHEREAS, the City of Renton has ratified the Countywide Planning Policies and subsequent amendments, and WHEREAS, Countywide Planning Policy FW-1 Step 9 provides for an amendment process to changer the Planning Policies as may be necessary from time to time, and WHEREAS, On April 9, 2007, the Metropolitan King County Council took action ratifying the proposed amendments to the King County Countywide Planning Policies including: 1) GMPC Motion 06-01 Amendment to the Potential Annexation Area Map by including the area known as West Hill within the Potential Annexation Area of the City of Renton PAA and adding this area to the City of Renton's PAA. 2) GMPC Motion 06-02 Amendment to the Countywide Planning policies revising existing policy LU-25b to allow adjustment of househhold and employment targets if a new municipal incorporation occurs within a designated Potential Annexation Area(PAA). 1 4sisminw IV RESOLUTION NO. 3886 3) GMPC Motion 06-03 Amendment to the Countywide Planning Policies by designating the Overlake area of Redmond as an Urban Center. WHEREAS, the amendment process requires ratification of the proposed amendments by at least 30 percent of the City and County governments representing 70 percent of the population in King County, NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON, DOES RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS: SECTION I. The above findings are true and correct in all respects. SECTION H. The best interests and general welfare of the City of Renton would be served by ratification of Ordinance 15709 (GMPC Motions 06-012, 06-02, and 06-03) as approved by the King County Council and the Growth Management Planning Council. PASSED BY THE CITY COUNCIL this 25th day of June , 2007. a `- Bonnie I. Walton, City Clerk APPROVED BY THE MAYOR this 25th day of June , 2007. Toni Nelson , ayor Pro Tempore Approved as to form: Lawrence J. Warren, City Attorney RES. 1279:06/20/07:ch 2 June 25, 2007 Renton City Council Minutes Page 222 *Pe '4100e recommended that the ordinance amending the 2007 Budget be presented for first reading. MOVED BY CLAWSON, SECONDED BY BRIERE, COUNCIL CONCUR IN THE COMMITTEE REPORT. CARRIED. (See page 222 for ordinance.) RESOLUTIONS AND The following resolutions were presented for reading and adoption: ORDINANCES Resolution#3886 A resolution was read ratifying amendments to the Countywide Planning Planning: 2006 Countywide Policies. MOVED BY BRIERE, SECONDED BY CORMAN, COUNCIL Planning Policies Amendments y ADOPT THE RESOLUTION AS READ. CARRIED. Resolution#3887 A resolution was read authorizing the Mayor and City Clerk to enter into an Transportation: Commute Trip interlocal cooperative agreement with the Washington State Department of Reduction Program Grant, Transportation authorizing release of State funds in the amount of$44,355.10 WSDOT for implementation of the Citywide Commute Trip Reduction program. MOVED BY CORMAN, SECONDED BY PALMER, COUNCIL ADOPT THE RESOLUTION AS READ. CARRIED. Resolution #3888 A resolution was read authorizing the Mayor and City Clerk to enter into an Transportation: Commute Trip agreement with King County for implementation of the Citywide Commute Trip Reduction Program Services, Reduction program in the amount of$38,060 to support activities of the City of King County Renton as required under the State of Washington Commute Trip Reduction Law. MOVED BY CORMAN, SECONDED BY PALMER, COUNCIL ADOPT THE RESOLUTION AS READ. CARRIED. Resolution#3889 A resolution was read authorizing the temporary street closures of Shattuck Streets: Rainier Ave S & Ave. S., Rainier Ave. S., and Hardie Ave. SW. MOVED BY LAW, Shattuck Ave S & Hardie Ave SECONDED BY CORMAN, COUNCIL ADOPT THE RESOLUTION AS SW Closures for RR Bridge AMENDED TO CORRECT THE FOLLOWING UNDER SECTION II: Replacements CHANGE THE RAINIER AVENUE CLOSURE DATE TO STATE "August 11, 2007, to August 15, 2007," AND CHANGE THE WORDS "The Mayor and City Clerk" TO "The City Council." CARRIED. Resolution #3890 A resolution was read authorizing the Mayor and City Clerk to enter into an Transportation: 1-405, (1-5 to interlocal cooperative agreement with the Washington State Department of SR-169) Stage 1 Widening, Transportation concerning funding of a project coordinator for the I-405, I-5 to WSDOT SR-169 Stage 1 Widening Project. MOVED BY PALMER, SECONDED BY PERSSON, COUNCIL ADOPT THE RESOLUTION AS READ. CARRIED. The following ordinances were presented for first reading and referred to the Council meeting of 7/2/2007 for second and final reading: Utility: SW 34th St Culvert An ordinance was read amending the 2007 Budget by transferring$150,000 Replacement Project Fund from the Lake Ave. S./Rainier Ave. S. Storm System Replacement Project Transfer, Budget Amend expenditure account to the SW 34th St. Culvert Replacement Project expenditure account. MOVED BY CLAWSON, SECONDED BY BRIERE, COUNCIL REFER THE ORDINANCE FOR SECOND AND FINAL READING ON 7/2/2007. CARRIED. Development Services: An ordinance was read amending Sections 4-5-040, 4-5-050,4-5-055,4-5-090, Standard Codes Adoption 4-5-100, and 4-5-110 and adding Section 4-5-051 of Chapter 5, Building and Fire Prevention Standards, of Title IV(Development Regulations) of City Code by adopting the 2006 International Building, Residential, Mechanical, The Washington State Energy Code, and Fuel Gas Codes; the 2005 National Electrical Code, the 2006 Washington State Ventilation and Indoor Air Quality June 25,2007 Renton City Council Minutes Page 219 extending from the Renton/Tukwila boundary to the SR-167 interchange. Work begins July 2, with some construction occurring in the Oakesdale vicinity in August and the overall project is expected to be completed by the end of 2009. AUDIENCE COMMENT Dave McCammon, 17221 125th Ave. SE, Renton, 98058, encouraged Council Citizen Comment: McCammon to support the Benson Hill Communities Annexation, and announced that the - Benson Hill Communities Benson Hill Communities Progress Group will hold an open public information Annexation, S 200th St& meeting on the proposed annexation at Renton Park Elementary School on July 128th Ave SE 19, from 6:30 p.m. to 8:30 p.m. CONSENT AGENDA Items on the consent agenda are adopted by one motion which follows the listing. At the request of Councilmembers, items 6.d. and 6.i. were removed for separate consideration. Council Meeting Minutes of Approval of Council meeting minutes of 6/18/2007. Council concur. 6/18/2007 Annexation: Benson Hill Administrative, Judicial and Legal Services Department recommended adoption Communities, S 200th St& of a resolution accepting the Boundary Review Board-amended boundaries for 128th Ave SE the Benson Hill Communities Annexation, amending the ballot title, and calling for King County to hold a special municipal election for placement on the 11/6/2007 ballot reflecting these changes. Refer to Committee of the Whole. Development Services: Development Services Division recommended adoption of the following: 2006 Standard Codes Adoption International Code Series; 2006 Washington State Energy Code; 2006 Washington State Ventilation and Indoor Air Quality Code; 2006 International Plumbing Code; and 2005 National Electrical Code. Council concur. (See page .222 for ordinance.) Planning: 2006 Countywide Economic Development,Neighborhoods and Strategic Planning Department Planning Policies Amendments recommended adoption of a resolution ratifying the 2006 amendments to the Growth Management Planning Council's Countywide Planning Policies. Council concur. (See page 222 for resolution.) Transportation: Oakesdale Ave Transportation Systems Division recommended approval of an agreement in the SW Wetland Ph I & II amount of$29,294.10 with Teufel Nursery, Inc. for Oakesdale Ave. SW Landscape Maintenance, Wetland Phase I and II landscape maintenance. Council concur. Teufel Nursery Transportation: Commute Trip Transportation Systems Division recommended approval of an agreement with Reduction Program Grant, Washington State Department of Transportation to accept funds in the amount WSDOT of$44,355.10 for the Commute Trip Reduction program. Council concur. (See page 222 for resolution.) Transportation: Commute Trip Transportation Systems Division recommended approval of an agreement in the Reduction Program Services, amount of$38,060 with King County Department of Transportation to provide King County Commute Trip Reduction services to 24 affected employers in the City of Renton for 2007-2008. Council concur. (See page 222 for resolution.) Utility: Surveying Services Utility Systems Division recommended approval of the Surveying Services Roster, 2007-2008 Roster, valid from July 2007 to July 2008, listing 11 professional land surveyors. Council concur. MOVED BY LAW, SECONDED BY CLAWSON,COUNCIL APPROVE THE CONSENT AGENDA AS AMENDED TO REMOVE ITEMS 6.d. AND 6.i. FOR SEPARATE CONSIDERATION. CARRIED. Chow,OF RENTON COUNCIL AGENDA .L AI#: 6, -" • Submitting Data: For Agenda of: June 25, 2007 Dept/Div/Board.. Economic Development, Neighborhoods and Strategic Planning Staff Contact Rebecca Lind(ext. 6588) Agenda Status Consent Subject: Public Hearing.. Correspondence.. Ratification of the 2006 Amendments to the Ordinance Countywide Planning Policies Resolution X Old Business Exhibits: New Business Issue Paper Study Sessions Resolution Information King County Correspondence King County Signature Reports with attached GMPC Motion Reports and King County Staff Reports Recommended Action: Approvals: Council Concur. Legal Dept X Finance Dept Other Fiscal Impact: NA Expenditure Required... Transfer/Amendment Amount Budgeted Revenue Generated Total Project Budget City Share Total Project.. SUMMARY OF ACTION: The Growth Management Planning Council (GMPC) and Metropolitan King County Council completed review of amendments to the Countywide Planning Policies (CPP) in April 2007. These amendments are now presented to the Renton City Council for ratification. Three issues are addressed in the 2006 CPP Amendments. • Motion 06-01 designates West Hill as part of Renton's Potential Annexation Area. • Motion 06-02 amends existing Countywide Planning Policy LU-25b to allow adjustment of household and employment targets of a new municipal incorporation occurs within a designated Potential Annexation Area. • Motion 06-03 designates the Overlake area of Redmond as an Urban Center. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Adopt a Resolution supporting GMPC Motions 06-01, 06-02, 06-03 to amend the Countywide Planning Policies. H:\EDNS P\Regional Issues\GMPC\CPPs\06CPPAmendmentAgendabilldoc.doc � ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT, � A; ® NEIGHBORHOODS, AND STRATEGIC • • PLANNING DEPARTMENT MEMORANDUM DATE: June 15, 2007 TO: Toni Nelson, Council President Members of the Renton City Council VIA: JKathy Keolker, Mayor FROM: Alex Pietsch, Administrator OP, STAFF CONTACT: Rebecca Lind, Long Range Planning Manager(ext. 6588) SUBJECT: Ratification of 2006 Amendment to the Countywide Planning Policies ISSUE: Should the City Council ratify the 2006 amendments to the Countywide Planning Policies (CPPs) as proposed by the Growth Management Planning Council (GMPC)? RECOMMENDATION: Adopt a resolution ratifying the amendments. BACKGROUND SUMMARY: The action before the City Council is the annual ratification of amendments to the CPPs that occurred in the last calendar year. The GMPC approved these amendments in September 2006, and the Metropolitan King County Council adopted and ratified them on behalf of unincorporated King County on April 9, 2007. To become effective, amendments must be ratified by at least 30 percent of the city and county governments representing 70 percent of the population of King County. Jurisdictions opposing the amendments are required to deny the ratification by July 8, 2007. If the City of Renton opposes the amendments, it is likely that they would still receive the necessary support from other jurisdictions to achieve ratification. Failure to act is deemed the equivalent of ratification. The CPPs are intended to provide a policy framework for all jurisdictions' comprehensive plans in order to provide the regional planning and coordination among local governments required by the Growth Management Act(GMA). The CPPs set forth guidance for the location of growth and infrastructure investment in the region and establish specific employment and housing targets for each jurisdiction. Jurisdictions must adopt land use and zoning to accommodate these H:\EDNSP\Regional Issues\GMPC\CPPs\2006 Ratification Issue Paper.doc Toni Nelson 111111e *if Page 2 of 2 June 15,2007 targets in their respective plans and development regulations. Several 2006 amendments specifically affect Renton. • Motion 06-01 adds the West Hill to Renton's PAA and was initiated at the City's request after the City Council amended the boundary on December 12, 2005. • Motion 06-02 was also proposed by the City or Renton, and offers a clarification of existing Countywide Planning Policy(CPP) LU-25b to allow adjustment of household and employment targets if a new municipal incorporation occurs within a designated Potential Annexation Area. This amendment is particularly important for the City because it provides a mechanism to insure that a future incorporated City of Fairwood would be responsible for accommodating its share of the regional growth target. At the present time CPP Policy LU-25b provides that growth targets shall be adjusted for annexations only. The new language adds incorporations to the policy statement. The proposed language of LU25b reads as follows: As annexations or incorporations occur, growth targets shall be adjusted. Household and employment targets for each jurisdiction's potential annexation area, as adopted in Table JU- 1, shall be transferred to the annexing jurisdiction or newly incorporated city as follows: a. King County and the respective city will determine new household and employment targets for areas under consideration for annexation prior to the submittal of the annexation proposal to the King County Boundary Review Board; b. b. A city's household and employment targets shall be increased by a share of the potential annexation area's development capacity located within the area annexed. In the case of incorporation, an equivalent formula shall be used to establish household and employment targets for the new city. Each city will determine how and where within their corporate boundaries to accommodate the target increases; c. The County's target shall be correspondingly decreased to ensure that overall target levels in the county remain the same; d. The household and employment targets in Table LU-1 will be updated periodically to reflect changes due to annexations or incorporations. These target updates do not require adoption by the Growth Management Planning Council. CONCLUSION The proposed 2006 amendments to the CPP are consistent with the GMA and support Renton's policy positions on the West Hill and on equitable assumption of growth targets in the Soos Creek portion of the PAA. Ratification of the amendment package is recommended. While it is not necessary to take formal action, passage of a resolution puts Renton on the record as supporting the amendments and provides a way to track Renton's position in the future. h:\ednsp\regional issues\gmpc\cpps\2006 ratification issue paper.doc CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON RATIFYING AMENDMENTS TO THE COUNTYWIDE PLANNING POLICIES. WHEREAS, the Growth Management Act, RCW 36.70A.210 mandates the development and adoption of Countrywide Planning Policies for King County; and WHEREAS, King County, the City of Seattle, the City of Bellevue and the Suburban Cities of King County have met jointly as the Growth Management Planning Council (GMP) to develop and recommend Countywide Planning Policies; and WHEREAS, the City of Renton has ratified the Countywide Planning Policies and subsequent amendments, and WHEREAS, Countywide Planning Policy FW-1 Step 9 provides for an amendment process to changer the Planning Policies as may be necessary from time to time, and WHEREAS, On April 9, 2007, the Metropolitan King County Council took action ratifying the proposed amendments to the King County Countywide Planning Policies including: 1) GMPC Motion 06-01 Amendment to the Potential Annexation Area Map by including the area known as West Hill within the Potential Annexation Area of the City of Renton PAA and adding this area to the City of Renton's PAA. 2) GMPC Motion 06-02 Amendment to the Countywide Planning policies revising existing policy LU-25b to allow adjustment of househhold and employment targets if a new municipal incorporation occurs within a designated Potential Annexation Area(PAA). 1 A RESOLUTION NO. 3) GMPC Motion 06-03 Amendment to the Countywide Planning Policies by designating the Overtake area of Redmond as an Urban Center. WHEREAS, the amendment process requires ratification of the proposed amendments by at least 30 percent of the City and County governments representing 70 percent of the population in King County, NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON, DOES RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS: SECTION I. The above findings are true and correct in all respects. SECTION II. The best interests and general welfare of the City of the City of Renton would be served by ratification of Ordinance 15709 (GMPC Motions 06-012, 06-02, and 06-03) as approved by the King County Council and the Growth Management Planning Council. PASSED BY THE CITY COUNCIL this day of , 2007. Bonnie I. Walton, City Clerk APPROVED BY THE MAYOR this day of , 2007. Kathy Keolker-Wheeler, Mayor Approved as to form: Lawrence J. Warren, City Attorney RES. 1279:06/20/07:ch 2 King County APR 3 0 2007 April 27, 2007 The Honorable Kathy Keolker City of Renton 1055 South Grady Way Renton, WA 98055 Dear Mayor I lker/ Ar �T We are pleased to forward for your consideration and ratification the enclosed amendments to the King County Countywide Planning Policies (CPP). On April 9, 2007, the Metropolitan King County Council approved and ratified amendments on behalf of unincorporated King County. Copies of the King County Council staff report, ordinance and Growth Management Planning Council motions are enclosed to assist you in your review of these amendments. • Ordinance No. 15709, GMPC Motion Nos. 06-1, 06-2 and 06-3 amending the Countywide Planning Policies by amending the interim Potential Annexation Area map in the Countywide Planning Policies; revising existing policy LU-25b to allow adjustment of household and employment targets if a new municipal incorporation occurs within a designated Potential Annexation Area; and designating the Overlake area of Redmond as an Urban Center, Overlake is added to the list of Urban Centers following Countywide Planning Policy LU-39. In accordance with the Countywide Planning Policies, FW-1, Step 9, amendments become effective when ratified by ordinance or resolution by at least 30 percent of the city and county governments representing 70 percent of the population of King County according to the interlocal agreement. A city will be deemed to have ratified the amendments to the Countywide Planning Policies unless, within 90 days of adoption by King County, the city takes legislative action to disapprove the amendments. Please note that the 90-day deadline for this amendment is July 8, 2007. Noe If you adopt any legislation relative to this action, please send a copy of the legislation by the close of business, July 9, 2007, to Anne Noris, Clerk of the Council, W1039 King County Courthouse, 516 Third Avenue, Seattle, WA 98104. If you have any questions about the amendments or ratification process, please contact Paul Reitenbach, Senior Policy Analyst, King County Department of Development and Environmental Services, at 206-296-6705, or Rick Bautista, Council Staff, King County Council, at 206-296-0329. Thank you for your prompt attention to this matter. Sincerely, 4 Larry Gossett, Chair - ms Metropolitan King County Council King County Executive Enclosures vcc: King County City Planning Directors Suburban Cities Association Stephanie Warden, Director, Department of Development and Environmental Services (DDES) Paul Reitenbach, Senior Policy Analyst, DDES Rick Bautista, Council Staff, Growth Management & Natural Resources Committee (GM&NR) KING COUNTY 1200King County Courthouse 516 Third Avenue Seattle,WA 98104 Signature Report King County April 10, 2007 Ordinance 15709 Proposed No. 2006-0578.1 Sponsors Phillips 1 AN ORDINANCE adopting amendments to the 2 Countywide Planning Policies; amending the interim 3 potential annexation areas map and ratifying the amended 4 Countywide Planning Policies for unincorporated King 5 County; and amending Ordinance 10450, Section 3, as 6 amended, and K.C.C. 20.10.030 and Ordinance 10450, 7 Section 4, as amended, and K.C.C. 20.10.040. 8 9 10 BE IT ORDAINED BY THE COUNCIL OF KING COUNTY: 11 SECTION 1. Findings. The council makes the following findings: 12 A. The metropolitan King County council adopted and ratified the Growth 13 Management Planning Council recommended King County 2012 - Countywide Planning 14 Policies (Phase I) in July 1992, under Ordinance 10450. 15 B. The metropolitan King County council adopted and ratified the Phase II 16 amendments to the Countywide Planning Policies on August 15, 1994, under Ordinance 17 11446. 1 Ordinance 15709 18 C. The Growth Management Planning Council met on April 26, 2006 and 19 September 20, 2006 and voted to recommend amendments to the King County 20 Countywide Planning Policies, amending the interim potential annexation areas map as 21 shown in Attachment A to this ordinance and designating Overlake an Urban Center as 22 shown on Attachment B to this ordinance. The Growth Management Planning Council 23 also approved an amendment to Countywide Planning Policy LU-25b to allow 24 adjustments of growth targets as municipal incorporations are approved. 25 SECTION 2. Ordinance 10450, Section 3, as amended, and K.C.C. 20.10.030 are 26 each hereby amended to read as follows: 27 Phase II. 28 A. The Phase II Amendments to the King County 2012 Countywide Planning 29 Policies attached to Ordinance 11446 are hereby approved and adopted. 30 B. The Phase II Amendments to the King County 2012 - Countywide Planning 31 Policies are amended, as shown by Attachment 1 to Ordinance 12027. 32 C. The Phase II Amendments to the King County 2012 - Countywide Planning 33 Policies are amended, as shown by Attachment 1 to Ordinance 12421. 34 D. The Phase II Amendments to the King County 2012-Countywide Planning 35 Policies are amended, as shown by Attachments 1 and 2 to Ordinance 13260. 36 E. The Phase II Amendments to the King County 2012 - Countywide Planning 37 Policies are amended, as shown by Attachments 1 through 4 to Ordinance 13415. 38 F. The Phase II Amendments to the King County 2012 - Countywide Planning 39 Policies are amended, as shown by Attachments 1 through 3 to Ordinance 13858. 2 • Ordinance 15709 'oar* 40 G. The Phase II Amendments to the King County 2012—Countywide Planning 41 Policies are amended, as shown by Attachment 1 to Ordinance 14390. 42 H. The Phase II Amendments to the King County 2012 —Countywide Planning 43 Policies are amended, as shown by Attachment 1 to Ordinance 14391. 44 I. The Phase II Amendments to the King County 2012 —Countywide Planning 45 Policies are amended, as shown by Attachment 1 to Ordinance 14392. 46 J. The Phase II Amendments to the King County 2012 - Countywide Planning 47 Policies are amended, as shown by Attachment 1 to Ordinance 14652. 48 K. The Phase II Amendments to the King County 2012 - Countywide Planning 49 Policies are amended, as shown by Attachments 1 through 3 to Ordinance 14653. 50 L. The Phase II Amendments to the King County 2012 - Countywide Planning 51 Policies are amended, as shown by Attachment 1 to Ordinance 14654. 52 M. The Phase II Amendments to the King County 2012 - Countywide Planning 53 Policies are amended, as shown by Attachment 1 to Ordinance 14655. 54 N. The Phase II Amendments to the King County 2012 - Countywide Planning 55 Policies are amended, as shown by Attachments 1 and 2 to Ordinance 14656. 56 O. The Phase II amendments to the King County 2012 —Countywide Planning 57 Policies are amended, as shown by Attachment A to Ordinance 14844. 58 P. The Phase II Amendments to the King County 2012 - Countywide Planning 59 Policies are amended as shown by Attachments A, B and C to Ordinance 15121. 60 Q. The Phase II Amendments to the King County 2012 - Countywide Planning 61 Policies are amended, as shown by Attachment A to Ordinance 15122. 3 Ordinance 15709 1610 ISO 62 R. The Phase II Amendments to the King County 2012 - Countywide Planning 63 Policies are amended, as shown by Attachment A to Ordinance 15123. 64 S. Phase II Amendments to the King County 2012 - Countywide Planning 65 Policies are amended, as shown by Attachments A and B to Ordinance 15426. 66 T. Phase II Amendments to the King County 2012 - Countywide Planning 67 Policies are amended, as shown by Attachments A, B and C to this ordinance. 68 SECTION 3. Ordinance 10450, Section 4, as amended, and K.C.C. 20.10.040 are 69 each hereby amended to read as follows: 70 Ratification for unincorporated King County. 71 A. Countywide Planning Policies adopted by Ordinance 10450 for the purposes 72 specified are hereby ratified on behalf of the population of unincorporated King County. 73 B. The amendments to the Countywide Planning Policies adopted by Ordinance 74 10840 are hereby ratified on behalf of the population of unincorporated King County. 75 C. The amendments to the Countywide Planning Policies adopted by Ordinance 76 11061 are-hereby ratified on behalf of the population of unincorporated King County. 77 D. The Phase II amendments to the King County 2012 Countywide Planning 78 Policies adopted by Ordinance 11446 are hereby ratified on behalf of the population of 79 unincorporated King County. 80 E. The amendments to the King County 2012 - Countywide Planning Policies, as 81 shown by Attachment 1 to Ordinance 12027 are hereby ratified on behalf of the 82 population of unincorporated King County. 4 Ordinance 15709 *1100. woe 83 F. The amendments to the King County 2012 - Countywide Planning Policies, as 84 shown by Attachment 1 to Ordinance 12421, are hereby ratified on behalf of the 85 population of unincorporated King County. 86 G. The amendments to the King County 2012 - Countywide Planning Policies, as 87 shown by Attachments 1 and 2 to Ordinance 13260, are hereby ratified on behalf of the 88 population of unincorporated King County. 89 H. The amendments to the King County 2012 - Countywide Planning Policies, as 90 shown by Attachment 1 through 4 to Ordinance 13415, are hereby ratified on behalf of 91 the population of unincorporated King County. 92 I. The amendments to the King County 2012 - Countywide Planning Policies, as 93 shown by Attachments 1 through 3 to Ordinance 13858, are hereby ratified on behalf of 94 the population of unincorporated King County. 95 J. The amendments to the King County 2012 - Countywide Planning Policies, as 96 shown by Attachment 1 to Ordinance 14390, are hereby ratified on behalf of the 97 population of unincorporated King County. 98 K. The amendments to the King County 2012 - Countywide Planning Policies, as 99 shown by Attachment 1 to Ordinance 14391, are hereby ratified on behalf of the 100 population of unincorporated King County. 101 L. The amendments to the King County 2012 - Countywide Planning Policies, as 102 shown by Attachment 1 to Ordinance 14392, are hereby ratified on behalf of the 103 population of unincorporated King County. 5 Aiomommmrimoir Ordinance 15709 NigiO 104 M. The amendments to the King County 2012 - Countywide Planning Policies, as 105 shown by Attachment 1 to Ordinance 14652, are hereby ratified on behalf of the 106 population of unincorporated King County. 107 N. The amendments to the King County 2012 - Countywide Planning Policies, as 108 shown by Attachments 1 through 3 to Ordinance 14653, are hereby ratified on behalf of 109 the population of unincorporated King County. 110 O. The amendments to the King County 2012 -Countywide Planning Policies, as 111 shown by Attachment 1 to Ordinance 14654, are hereby ratified on behalf of the 112 population of unincorporated King County. 113 P. The amendments to the King County 2012 - Countywide Planning Policies, as 114 shown by Attachment 1 to Ordinance 14655, are hereby ratified on behalf of the 115 population of unincorporated King County. 116 Q. The amendments to the King County 2012 -Countywide Planning Policies, as 117 shown by Attachments 1 and 2 to Ordinance 14656, are hereby ratified on behalf of the 118 population of unincorporated King County. 119 R. The amendments to the King County 2012—Countywide Planning Policies, as 120 shown by Attachment A to Ordinance 14844, are hereby ratified on behalf of the 121 population of unincorporated King County. 122 S. The amendments to the King County 2012 - Countywide Planning Policies, as 123 shown by Attachments A, B and C to Ordinance 15121, are hereby ratified on behalf of 124 the population of unincorporated King County. 6 Ordinance 15709 Noe Nuie 125 T. The amendments to the King County 2012 - Countywide Planning Policies, as 126 shown by Attachment A to Ordinance 15122, are hereby ratified on behalf of the 127 - population of unincorporated King County. 128 U. The amendments to the King County 2012 - Countywide Planning Policies, as 129 shown by Attachment A to Ordinance 15123, are hereby ratified on behalf of the 130 population of unincorporated King County. 131 V. The amendments to the King County 2012 - Countywide Planning Policies, as 132 shown by Attachments A and B to Ordinance 15426, are hereby ratified on behalf of the 133 population of unincorporated King County. 134 W. The amendments to the King County 2012 - Countywide Planning Policies, 7 Amormir Ordinance 15709 111W NW 135 as shown by Attachments A, B and C to this ordinance, are hereby ratified on behalf of 136 the population of unincorporated King County. 137 Ordinance 15709 was introduced on 2/5/2007 and passed by the Metropolitan King County Council on 4/9/2007, by the following vote: Yes: 9 - Mr. Gossett, Ms. Patterson, Ms. Lambert, Mr. von Reichbauer, Mr. Dunn, Mr. Ferguson, Mr. Phillips, Ms. Hague and Mr. Constantine No: 0 Excused: 0 KING COUNTY COUNCIL KING COUNTY,WASHINGTON . /..;:ifieit Larry Gossett, Chair ATTEST: j'IWk ' r r Anne Noris,Clerk of the Council .. .' r' -; ':t-r (.... :7.:-t‘ -T.!? ,---: APPROVED this 13 day of APR.-«- ,2007_ 1 CJ ! r; LO Ron Sims,County Executive Attachments A.Motion No.06-1--Dated April 26,2006, B. Motion No.06-2--Dated April 26, 2006, C. Motion No.06-03--Dated September 20,2006 8 : 557O9 2006578 4/26/06 Attachment A Sponsored By: Executive Committee /pr 1 MOTION NO. 06-1 2 A MOTION to amend the interim Potential Annexation Area 3 map in the Countywide Planning Policies. 4 5 6 7 WHEREAS,Countywide Planning Policies LU-3 1 and LU-32 anticipate the collaborative 8 designation of Potential Annexation Areas(PAA) and the eventual annexation of these 9 areas by cities. 10 11 WHEREAS,the attached PAA map amendment removes one of the largest unincorporated 12 urban areas not within the PAA of any city and adds this area to the City of Renton PAA. 13 14 WHEREAS, the attached PAA map amendment is supported by the City of Renton and 15 King County. 16 17 BE IT RESOLVED THAT THE GROWTH MANAGEMENT PLANNING COUNCIL OF 18 KING COUNTY HEREBY MOVES AS FOLLOWS: 19 20 21 1. Amend the Interim Potential Annexation Area Map by including the area known as • 22 West Hill,shown on attachment A of this motion,within the Potential Annexation 23 Area of the City of Renton. 24 25 2. This amendment is recommended to the Metropolitan King County Council and the 26 Cities of King County for adoption and ratification. • 27 28 ADOPTED by the Growth Management Planning Council of King County on 29 April 26, 2006 in open session and 'a ed by the chair of the GMPC. 30 31 32 &r .>4 33 Ron ims,Chair, Growth Man.gement Planning Council 34 - 1 - Neo tillif 5709 Attachment A N Interim PAA Amendment 0 King County TY H.r.YfY.Itl.dd FM mW h.f b.w.a..p3.d W d3..i n'' Km C.'4 n+toc w. nps''a' ....r ..n.o''""", r.o se a t.14 in.r,mnpld..�., 3•-�•�- �p•�•d PAA Boundary ..onus a,.d Info..d.,4 i.m s. ...44.411 d M ,r4•44i44040.0...mk..N.n tlb n.p. My uN d FII .i M.m.famq 4pdp3.d.I..d Wr,k..P•m'V.nd f���:' n t______; Incorporated Areas OS a a Mks wO N.CWM7a1tl1tal..� dIMr�OZLVMId IfI�{,y��yr.�. I� kia-E--.„_,,,.:i,- iy, 14.6oill.416._,a-... 'T "till W -.1,0w . ts-r,..:-':',,. .,. . ::::..-;: -,..„„,-.,..,-....,.. ,,. -:,. .,..,,,:.. .,,,,., ' -s-' a'-'''''': - - It r ,, . ,,,,,,,,, f - i "�i. olone . .,,ia, : ...is, : . .110 iv,.. , 6.1 - i16wq_ _:,_. . ,....„, :414. i fmit tq.� , i. v11.# tiiit.:,,..,.: .. :, „,.:„.,.:. i tiANing_ok S S,I p + _ -:,,,.:::-.-riNiT,I.7 - I �4 J:x_ `.fop . EEIII f1f4fiA 1.tlS�mi maibil � < s y :r:::,.:-.:.:.:11-..1..:. ��r = i " ::;: ;:,:7'; .1"1::'-'-0,17.4-1.:._4-1::!..1.::5:.i.ii.:_;:: lg®�w.'I" Z 1"‘" "VI r■Q*r�irisnr Area to be added to - i' rf=� = r T City of Renton's PAA `;�� , „.,,,_,,,:c:,:„,,,,i::::::,...::____zzi„.„.,...,,,,Iii,„::=1,..,„;,....,:.,..i..,,,,,,t......,r!"! S 1.60 PIR r , �� �., _ dpif - M., lia- .. --..1.{: : ::='::.'1::.1._-::".i.7..j:::::k".' ;:::',":4.,_, _ -' _- .:r: S4. iklialliWi!ilik' fir 1mmaii _ --::12 , kk-:*4:Et '----.1.1_: 14ak 's' rw. ' labillholMilkliftlinLMA : 14 & $ gyp. k.II f �� „_: ..: .,:.z4,.-, 4 E �i 5 ]MY vr-= N),‘ '1 , iffeA-_ ...7,:_;'.: \:".z: t,4_!,1.,:„-_,..,!__-_,_7::::::_1:,:.:.-. ..-,..N,.:_,....;:v.1-:=.1,i7:,-.*.--Tit„:,_77:::4,1iicr_!_-!:' �. ro ! -: c-: • :‘.„::-=-1,.f.,"''IVIi-N.:,..415irE 1, -:;,:',A=- 3_;i:,_"-tirte!-='117;,.M1*-IL7 i rH p ` _ .' j - 11 I®i� .... = .M,.SW g4t 77 ! _ {_ rip _ - - . - sw)fhh :. rrn _i ) 5 7 0 9 , ® � 6 5 7 8 Attachment B April 26,2006 Sponsored By: Executive Committee /pr 1 MOTION NO. 06-2 2 A MOTION by the Growth Management Planning Council of King 3 County recommending the amendment of the Countywide Planning 4 Policies by revising existing policy LU-25b to allow adjustment of 5 household and employment targets if a new municipal incorporation 6 occurs within a designated Potential Annexation Area(PAA). 7 8 "WHEREAS, in accordance with the Growth Management Act(GMA),the Countywide 9 Planning Policies establish a household and employment target for each city and to for unincorporated Urban designated King County through 2022; and 11 12 WHEREAS, Countywide Planning Policy LU-25b states that the adopted household and • 13 employment targets shall be adjusted as annexations occur within a Potential Annexation 14 Area,but no similar provision is made if a municipal incorporation occurs within a PAA. 15 THE GROWTH MANAGEMENT PLANNING COUNCIL OF KING COUNTY 16 HEREBY MOVES AS FOLLOWS: 17 . 18 Amend Sections III. C. of the King County Countywide Planning Policies as follows: 19 20 21 LU25b As annexations or incorporations occur, growth targets shall be adjusted. 22 - Household and employment targets for each jurisdiction's potential 23 annexation area, as adopted in Table LU-1, shall be transferred to the 24 annexing jurisdiction or newly incorporated city as follows: 25 26 a. King County and the respective city will determine new household 27 and employment targets for areas under consideration for 28 annexation prior to the submittal of the annexation proposal to the 29 King County Boundary Review Board; 30 b. A city's household and employment targets shall be increased by a 31 share of the target for the potential annexation area proportionate to 32 the share of the potential annexation area's development capacity 33 located within the area annexed. In the case of incorporation, an 34 equivalent formula shall be used to establish household and 35 employment targets for the new city. Each city will determine how 36 and where within their corporate boundaries to accommodate the 37 target increases; - 1. - *111111 57Ø9 t c. The County's target shall be correspondingly decreased to ensure 2 that overall target levels in the county remain the same; 3 d. The household and employment targets in Table LU-1 will be 4 updated periodically to reflect changes due to annexations or s incorporations. These target updates do not require adoption by the 6 Growth Management Planning Council. 7 8 9 ADOPTED by the Growth Management Planning Council of King County on April 246 to 20026 in open session. 1 12 • 13 14 15 R Sims, Chair, Growth Management Planning Council 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 - 2 - 15709 2OO657 .:• 9/20/06 Attachment C Sponsored By: Executive Committee /pr 1 MOTION NO. 06-03 2 A MOTION to amend the Countywide Planning Policies by 3 designating the Overtake area of Redmond as an Urban 4 Center. Overtake is added to the list of Urban Centers 5 following Countywide Planning Policy LU-39. 6 7 8 9 WHEREAS,a goal of the Growth Management Act is to encourage development in Urban 10 Areas where adequate public facilities exist or can be provided in an efficient manner; 11 12 WHEREAS,Policy LU-39 of the Countywide Planning Policies of King County describes 13 the criteria for Urban Center designation; 14 15 WHEREAS,Policy LU-40 of the Countywide Planning Policies of King County describes 16 standards for planned land uses within Urban Centers; 17 18 WHEREAS,the City of Redmond has demonstrated that Overtake meets the criteria for 19 designation as an Urban Center;and 20 21 WHEREAS,King County Comprehensive Plan Policy U-108 supports the development of 22 Urban Centers to meet the region's needs for housing,jobs,services,culture and recreation 23 and to promote health. 24 25 BE IT RESOLVED THAT THE GROWTH MANAGEMENT PLANNING COUNCIL OF 26 KING COUNTY HEREBY MOVES AS FOLLOWS: 27 28 29 1. The Overtake area of Redmond is designated as an Urban Center. The list of Urban 30 Centers following Countywide Planning Policy LU-39 is modified to include Overtake. 31 32 2. This amendment is recommended to the Metropolitan King County Council and the 33 Cities of King County for adoption and ratification. 34 35 36 - 1 - tar 1 5 71) 9 7 1 ADOPTED by the Growth Management Planning Council of King County on 2 September 20,2006 in open session and signed by the chair of the GMPC. 3 4 5 6 on , air,Growth Manag ent Planning Council 7 • - 2 - 'Nor 0 O A ,.. . 157O9 . . • IDleuer: ii; •;•�ab.�rifiga pia^'ay9 i _ aye:111 goon..nt::: 9� me2..♦♦ •ilea ::::,.�'s ri log OE IP, to„v.-„3 -.(s.c &tiro xi-I, '• • -. Or �;•NE51STST fd ! lln le l■� � jte..er tu (1) r WI � Aii'' ., IL ilk.�i ; . w Vx ...r „, MI No m 111 t-.. ■��li■11 ll►!�t AAPalAri■Il� a4�' :iii j1U�11111 I' -fir11 ■JA4L$ �_ ■ \ •111111 II\� •'' .... N „�a- • -. -r NE40THST ..--.. tP\Q\ �rfi ■�Auo.aarf a Ojiiiia'�'Y�; /.a ■.Ala unat St ��.- NE 40TH ST ru. `�- NE40TH$T . a— oseimi. 111111v, II' Oi �Z 2 p igirlegivittim •ntuu�• ..tea, 11111111 Ali: .r.■ •MIN 1 EMU 111 �/aE !!!� ` \ sir■gnll �..r• ;.nt ♦ �� MOW Millin.___. to-' * to- N P'Arifill./ f•Ivitig im ! inaal : i liiti t •s� •aign• �t1� /\.-.. .'� ` • Amigo �t�nri.it p� at �N a�.■a►a■ ,,=,_ �`v� .:r•'\�\\ Nil \ ••v..• =—,t:■r ne•aunn/r t:rit 111.i •LIr/ p' \\�\ ��1'\ \\���I� :..■0.fi...► ..ate►• gallu� ♦ :.ai:■:a ���rp::' .tp:.rrj"d111 ►a t r' \\\�\h.Q��\ `\`` ••uvlllh1111�•,fn.•.. ■ _,. Jite• ��. . \\\\ •• .I�11■1■. ► 1 i roes ice. �il/ID% �� 1 \r... ■ ��.Ciaallllllni!i r'•�nl■! •�u•nr. • IIII/1 � 5 •••1 O11 ��■:flingf Iiiffil ili.: • ��I •••'`'..lim. ua1,"1, c __, 1U111�� � ` ` \\\\ 0 �11r�1:IMP'•111.5 1: '4rt"' ':el.• 1/��-'. 'r 1� ..r/ 1�r�' V1 \ \�\� �t i.�I�.�a•11111•I� �����III!: ►�♦♦•�• ice` =:jiff `- ,, . \ \\\.:\\\\\\\\`'7\7-:,411��1��,Li Li!GG nlll:l': i•♦sii i .t�i 1- lll�[w.1S1,T LI/ wNE24THSTZ F. <MI NI" ■r•�• .•d " alit.�111I11�..d �'''�' I �� HO ftu■t r i �..aauurgq�.r�Nn• r* �1I�� ■1; o gill ! -.RTy� .. v. ilt�■■■•qa r•��!:s, fie:i=�12 1��..�1} lRE9�/ MINI -1Ygy i r utar�dr►�•• .•� •.:i LUX f••: 86 �� ■ . �.. ►■■.slot■■/1.•••i••• •r. .:tee: •■- ',- ■ fa •� 1. Itl1.MS ••IU•�.i•. .,�j—■1;loI. :+....9„. IIMIMI : 11 f•.!+ it rn� :l-.%Molly ,l it%%. :o 1. �7,441, _21♦1�■■■ i Ph t� rr:,` v ifla�`at ■\pap7 4■111�' r -m,aim . -,,;t`!���:� =..►�:Iltl■:���!gill IIIJ._�■�ni 11rlualr i r- bli (,i♦♦a:b , ►�t1/■I.1111 it ....L II.►... ,......ni ii '�� ■ •' ►♦h�,n. i�ar:••gl it I18,%ilHn■- ■nldl ■Iu I—11 Ira ••'' r.��r;1 ., _ I.I l tit Legend . • �.°• .• �,41,let /% Center ,° Overtake Urban Center LiJIIIIn:l City Boundary "'�`` Redmond, WA i 1 Parcel Boundaries alrr' .tom r\ `- 1‘ Jr '-� l fir . King County ^'' " . ^; �f, 1. n t Ron Sims KingCountyExecutive r( « ��:: ram,: 701 Fifth Avenue,Suite 3210 • Seattle, WA 98104 206-296-4040 Fax 206-296-0194 TTY Relay: 711 2 0 0 6 INK 5 7 8 www.metrokc.gov November 20, 2006 Cak.MAIrldeck The Honorable Larry Phillips (LULL Chair, King County Council Room 1200 COURTHOUSE Dear Councilmember Phillips: I am pleased to submit to you an ordinance that will adopt motions that have been approved by the Growth Management Planning Council (GMPC). Under the interlocal agreement that established the GMPC, a motion is first approved by GMPC. King County Council must then approve the motion and ratify it for the unincorporated area. Finally, the motion is sent to all of the cities in King County for ratification. There are no fiscal impacts to King County government as a result of these motions_ The attached three motions are the result of regional cooperation. Each received unanimous approval by the Growth Management Planning Council. One of these motions amends the Countywide Planning Policies interim potential annexation areas (PAA) map to add the area known as West Hill to the PAA for the city of Renton. The annexation of the West Hill area is one of the highest priorities of the King County Annexation Initiative. In 2005, King County supported a community governance study that resulted in a recommendation by area residents to join Renton_ Earlier this month, I transmitted to you an interlocal agreement(ILA) between King County and Renton that establishes the goal to have the nearly 15,000 residents that live in the West Hill area annexed by Renton before January 2009. The fiscal impact of this action was analyzed in a fiscal note attached to the legislation authorizing the ILA_ The second motion makes a correction to Countywide Planning Policy LU-25b to allow adjustment of growth targets as new incorporations occur in King County. The third motion amends the Countywide Planning Policies by designating Overlake as an Urban Center, recognizing Redmond's efforts to plan for future redevelopment under the Growth Management Act. i570 9 King County is an Equal Opportunity/Affirmative A61duti Employer # •/( No 120zu and complies with the Americans with DiVtAi ties Act The Honorable Larry Phi *se November 20, 2006 Page 2 My staff is available to assist the council in its review of these GMPC motions. Please contact Stephanie Warden, Director, Department of Development and Environmental Services (DDES), at 206-296-6700, for further information regarding this transmittal. Sincerely, on Sims King County Executive Enclosures cc: King County Councilmembers ATTN: Ross Baker, Chief of Staff Shelley Sutton, Policy Staff Director Anne Noris, Clerk of the Council Bob Cowan, Director, Office of Management and Budget Stephanie Warden, Director, Department of Development and Environmental Services Paul Reitenbach, Senior Policy Analyst, Department of Development and Environmental Services 0 Nftie Metropolitan King County Council Growth Management and Natural Resources Committee Staff Report Agenda Item: 3 Name: Rick Bautista Proposed Ord: 2006-0578 Date: February 27, 2007 Adopting GMPC Motions 06-1, 06-2 and 06-3 Attending: Paul Reitenbach, DDES SUBJECT: Adopting amendments to the Countywide Planning Policies to adjust the potential annexation area (PAA)for the city of Renton, adjust growth targets as a result of incorporations within existing city PAAs, and to designate the Overlake area of Redmond as an Urban Center. BACKGROUND: The Growth Management Planning Council and Countywide Planning Policies The Growth Management Planning Council (GMPC) is a formal body comprised of elected officials from King County, Seattle, Bellevue, the Suburban Cities, and Special Districts. The GMPC was created in 1992 by interlocal agreement, in response to a provision in the Washington State Growth Management Act (GMA) requiring cities and counties to work together to adopt Countywide Planning Policies (CPPs). Under GMA, countywide planning policies serve as the framework for each individual jurisdiction's comprehensive plan, and ensure countywide consistency with respect to land use planning efforts. As provided for in the interlocal agreement, the GMPC developed and recommended the CPPs, which were adopted by the King County Council and ratified by the cities. Subsequent amendments to the CPPs follow the same process: recommendation by the GMPC, adoption by the King County Council, and ratification by the cities. Amendments to the CPPs become effective when ratified by ordinance or resolution by at least 30% of the city and county governments representing at least 70% of the population of King County. A city shall be deemed to have ratified an amendment to the CPPs unless, within 90 days of adoption by King County, the city by legislative action disapproves it. SUMMARY: Proposed Ordinance 2006-0578 would adopt the following three motions (06-1, 06-2 and 06-3) approved by the GMPC in April and September 2006: • GMPC Motion 06-1 would amend the interim Potential Annexation Area (PAA) for the City of Renton. • GMPC Motion 06-2 would make a correction to CPP Policy LU-25b to allow adjustment of growth targets if new municipal incorporations occur within designated PAAs. • GMPC Motion 06-3 would amend the CPP Policy LU-39by adding Overlake to the list of Urban Centers. The ordinance would also ratify the change on behalf of the population of unincorporated King County, as required by Countywide Planning Policy FW-1, Step 9. GMPC MOTION 06-1 (MAP,j ENDMENT: CITY OF RENTON PAA) 400 The unincorporated urban area of"West Hill" is located between the cities of Renton, Seattle and Tukwila and is currently located outside of the mapped PAA of any of these three cities. Over the course of the past ten years, the West Hill community has been exploring governance options, which have included annexation into one or more of the three adjacent cities or incorporation as a new city. King County has conducted two governance studies during that period to analyze financial and service delivery issues for each of the governance options. Ultimately, both studies concluded that annexation was the most viable future governance option. However, until recently none of the cities had expressed strong interest in moving forward with annexation of the area. In the past year, the Renton City Council has taken action to include the West Hill area within their PAA, thus resolving the quandary of what to do with one of the largest unincorporated urban areas remaining outside of a city PAA. Approval of Motion 06-1 would recognize the action of the Renton City Council and is consistent with the Growth Management Act, applicable Countywide Planning Policies, the King County Comprehensive Plan, and the City of Renton Comprehensive Plan. GMPC MOTION 06-2 TARGET ADJUSTMENTS FOR INCORPORATIONS WITHIN PAAS) The Countywide Planning Policies (CPPs) establish household and job growth targets for cities, Potential Annexation Areas (PAAs), and unclaimed urban unincorporated areas. Anticipating the eventuality of changing jurisdictional boundaries in King County, particularly the shifting of unincorporated urban areas to city jurisdiction, the CPPs contain policies such as LU- 25b which specifically establishes a formula for adjusting growth targets upon annexation of urban unincorporated areas by cities. The formula is based on a proportionality of land use capacity in annexed areas, and ensures that cities take on additional target levels commensurate with the capacity to accommodate jobs and housing in the areas that are annexed. Given the frequency of annexations and the formula-based target adjustment called for, LU-25b also makes the adjustment process an administrative rather than a legislative action. The city of Renton had initiated the proposed revision to LU-25b to make explicit that the policy applies equally to new incorporations (versus just annexations), in large measure because the Renton PAA contains the Fairwood area, which had been under study for potential incorporation. Since that time, the proposed incorporation failed to be approved by voters of the proposed city. Although the incorporation of the Fairwood area ultimately failed, the revision to LU-25b would ensure that, in any case where a new city incorporation occurs within the PAA of an existing city, the growth targets for the existing city would be adjusted commensurate with land use capacity for lands remaining in the PAA of the existing city GMPC MOTION 06-3(URBAN CENTER DESIGNATION:OVERLAKE) The City of Redmond initiated the request to amend the CPP LU-39 to add its Overlake area to the list of Urban Centers. The city has followed the process for obtaining such a designation, starting with amending its own plans, policies and capital improvement programs, and secured the recommendation of approval for Motion 06-3 on September 20, 2006 by the Growth Management Planning Council. A complete analysis of the city's proposal as presented to the GMPC is included as Attachment 2 to this staff report. The CPPs describe Urban Centers as areas of concentrated employment and housing, with direct service by high-capacity transit and a wide range of other land uses. Collectively, they are expected to account for uG one half of King County's employmer owth and one quarter of household growth over the/Text 20 years. The list of Urban Centers in Countywide Planning Policy LU-39 currently includes: • Bellevue CBD • Downtown Auburn • Downtown Burien • Federal Way CBD • Kent CBD • Redmond CBD • Renton CBD • Seattle CDD • Seattle Center • First Hill/Capitol Hill • University District • Northgate • SeaTac CBD • Tukwila CBD • Totem Lake • South Lake Union In order to be designated as an Urban Center,jurisdictions must meet specific criteria in the Countywide Planning Policies, including having planned land uses to accommodate: • A minimum of 15,000 jobs within one-half mile of a transit center; • At a minimum, an average of 50 employees per gross acre; and • At a minimum, an average of 15 households per acre. In addition to these requirements, Policy LU-40 states that fully realized Urban Centers shall be characterized by the following: • Clearly defined geographic boundaries; • An intensity/density of land uses sufficient to support effective and rapid transit; • Pedestrian emphasis within the Center; • Emphasis on superior urban design which reflects the local community; • Limitations on single-occupancy vehicle usage during peak commute hours; • A broad array of land uses and choices within those land uses for employees and residents; • Sufficient public open spaces and recreational opportunities; and • Uses which provide both daytime and nighttime activities in the Center. Specific factors leading to the GMPC action are that: • Overlake is well positioned within the regional transportation network, adjacent to SR-520 and within 3 miles of 1-405 and can support extension of high capacity transit across Lake Washington on both 1-90 and SR 520 with service to urban centers in Downtown Bellevue, Overlake and Downtown Redmond, specifically: • The proposed Overlake Urban Center includes a transit center at SR 520 and NE 40th Street and at 152nd Avenue NE and NE 26th Street. METRO, Sound Transit and Community Transit provide service to the area via these transit centers. • Sound Transit's long range plan identifies a fixed-guideway transit system extendin " across Lake Washington on both 1-90 and SR 520 with connections to Bellevue, Overlake and Downtown Redmond. For purposes of the initial Phase 2 financiak analysis, Sound Transit is using a representative alignment that includes the 1.=90 crossing and then through Bellevue to Overlake and to Downtown Redmond. Within Overlake, the representative alignment extends along 152nd Avenue NE and SR 520, with stations at or in the vicinity of the existing Overlake transit centers. These station locations would reinforce the vision for mixed-use development in the area, significantly improve travel opticior people who work or live in the arend help spur redevelopment in thh verlake shopping center area. • Redmond has a strong Commute Trip Reduction program. Overlake includes 18 companies that are affected by the Commute Trip Reduction (CTR) law, and they are already achieving the City's goal for use of modes other than driving alone. Currently, 25 percent of people who work for these employers use modes other than driving alone, which is on track to meet the 2012 goal of 30 percent non-single occupant vehicle (SOV)_ Employers use a variety of methods to improve the non-SOV mode share including private shuttles, reserved parking for carpools and vanpools, transit and vanpool subsidies, bicycle parking and flexible work schedules. • The City's Transportation Master Plan provides clear direction and standards for improving the environment for pedestrians and bicyclists accessing the Overlake Urban Center. The TMP also sets out the strategy for funding these improvements and for monitoring progress. • Overlake is recognized regionally as a growth center and when compared to urban centers in King County, is second for total employment only to three Seattle urban centers: Downtown, 1Sc Hill/Capitol Hill, and University District (based on King Count 2005 Benchmarks Report). In terms of existing multi-family dwellings, Overlake compares favorably to a number of the designated urban centers in the central Puget Sound region. • As of 2004, an estimated 36,600 people worked within the proposed Overlake Urban Center, which equates to 72 jobs per gross acre. Under the Microsoft Development Agreement, an additional 1.5 million square feet of commercial floor area (net) will be constructed east of SR 520 within the Overlake Urban Center. With this development, the number of people working in the Overlake Center is expected to reach 44,800 by 2022, or 87 jobs per gross acre. Based on the current rate of employment growth, Redmond expects to reach this employment level earlier than 2022. • As of 2005, the Overlake Urban Center contained nearly 770 dwelling units. Redmond has the capacity under current zoning to accommodate the urban center criteria of 15 households per acre and has based its adopted growth targets on increasing the amount of housing in this area to nearly 2,300 dwellings by 2022. This future density is within the range of long-range densities planned for other designated urban centers in the central Puget Sound region. • Redmond's Comprehensive Plan, development standards, and capital improvement plans address a number of the other strategies listed in CPP LU-45. The City's policies and standards emphasize the importance of designing buildings and sites to not only be attractive but also to encourage walking and bicycling. • Redmond's Plan also recognizes that providing open spaces and recreational opportunities within the Overlake shopping area is a high priority. Finally, Redmond has also worked closely with Bellevue through the Bel-Red Overlake Transportation Study(BROTS) in order to identify and implement needed transportation improvements to improve mobility in the verlake area. ATTA ENTS: 1. Prop ed Ordinance 2006-0074 with attached GMPC Motions 2. GMPC ff reports for Motions 06-1, 06-2 and 06-3 low CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON RESOLUTION NO. 3824 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON, RATIFYING AMENDMENTS TO THE COUNTYWIDE PLANNING POLICIES. WHEREAS, the Growth Management Act, RCW 36.70A.210 mandates the development and adoption of Countywide Planning Policies for King County; and WHEREAS, King County, the City of Seattle, the City of Bellevue and the Suburban Cities of King County have met jointly as the Growth Management Planning Council (GMPC) to develop and recommend Countywide Planning Policies; and WHEREAS, the City of Renton has ratified the Countywide Planning Policies and subsequent amendments; and WHEREAS, Countywide Planning Policy FW-1, Step 9, provides for an amendment process to change the Planning Policies as may be necessary from time to time; and WHEREAS, on April 24, 2006, the Metropolitan King County Council ratified the proposed amendments to the King County Countywide Planning Policies, including: 1) GMPC Motion 05-01, Amendment to the Potential Annexation Area Map correcting an error on the interim PAA map by deleting a 30.3 acre area from the City of Tukwila's PAA and adding this area to the City of Kent's PAA; and 2) GMPC Motion 05-02, Amendment designating the South Lake Union area of Seattle as an Urban Center as defined in the CPPs; and liar RESOLUTION NO. 38240 WHEREAS, the amendment process requires ratification of proposed amendments by at least 30 percent of the City and County governments representing 70 percent of the population in King County; NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON, DOES RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS: SECTION I. The above findings are true and correct in all respects. SECTION II. The best interests and general welfare of the City of Renton would be served by ratification of Ordinance 15426 (GMPC Motions 05-01 and 05-02), as approved by the King County Council and the Growth Management Planning Council. PASSED BY THE CITY COUNCIL this 26th day of June , 2006. 6 71i41-1 ( )U1 to d Bonnie I. Walton, City Clerk APPROVED BY THE MAYOR this 26th day of June , 2006. -6041 1� Kathy Keol er, Mayor Approved as to form: C2eW0"114Piti Lawrence J. Warr , City Attorney RES.1199:6/21/06:ma • June 26, 2006 *too' Renton City Council Minutes `Not Page 226 Human Resources: 2006 Finance Committee Chair Persson presented a report recommending Group Health Cooperative concurrence in the staff recommendation to approve the annual renewal of the Medical Coverage Contracts Group Health Cooperative medical coverage agreements as follows: LEOFF 1 (Law Enforcement Officers and Fire Fighters)employees(Contract No. 0390400); LEOFF I Retirees (Contract Nos. 0057500 and 4057500); and all other City of Renton covered employees(Contract No. 1162600). Funding was previously approved by Council in the 2006 Budget. The revisions are applicable to all four of the renewal contracts. As in prior years, Group Health does not send confirming contracts for signature until mid year. The Committee further recommended that the Mayor and City Clerk be authorized to execute the contracts. MOVED BY PERSSON, SECONDED BY LAW, COUNCIL CONCUR IN THE COMMITTEE REPORT. CARRIED. CAG: 05-164,Henry Moses Finance Committee Chair Persson presented a report regarding the bid award Aquatic Center Lighting for the Henry Moses Aquatic Center Lighting Improvements Project. The Improvements, Scott's Electric Committee recommended concurrence in the staff recommendation to declare Service T. Miller Construction's bid as non-responsive,and award the project to the second lowest bidder, Scott's Electric Service, LLC, in the amount of $239,344.77. The Committee further recommended that the Mayor and City Clerk be authorized to sign the contract. MOVED BY PERSSON, SECONDED BY LAW, COUNCIL CONCUR IN THE COMMITTEE REPORT. CARRIED. RESOLUTIONS AND The following resolutions were presented for reading and adoption: ORDINANCES Resolution#3823 A resolution was read approving the Ridgeview Court Final Plat; approximately Plat: Ridgeview Court, 2.4 acres located in the vicinity of 327 Bremerton Ave. NE. MOVED BY Bremerton Ave NE, FP-06-012 BRIERE, SECONDED BY CLAWSON, COUNCIL ADOPT THE RESOLUTION AS READ. CARRIED. Resolution#3824 A resolution was read ratifying the amendments to the Countywide Planning Planning: 2005 Countywide Policies. MOVED BY BRIERE, SECONDED BY CLAWSON, COUNCIL Planning Policies Amendments ADOPT THE RESOLUTION AS READ. CARRIED. Resolution#3825 A resolution was read authorizing the Mayor and City Clerk to enter into an Transportation: Hardie Ave interlocal cooperative agreement with the Washington State Department of SW Improvements, WSDOT Transportation to accept grant funds under a highways and local program State Grant funding agreement for the SR-900—Hardie Ave. SW to Rainier Ave. Project, for pedestrian and bicycle improvements. MOVED BY PALMER, SECONDED BY PERSSON, COUNCIL ADOPT THE RESOLUTION AS READ. CARRIED. Resolution#3826 A resolution was read authorizing the Mayor and City Clerk to enter into an Transportation: Rainier Ave interlocal cooperative agreement with the Washington State Department of (4th to 2nd) Improvements, Transportation to accept grant funds under a highways and local program State WSDOT Grant funding agreement for Rainier Ave. pedestrian and bicycle improvements. MOVED BY PALMER, SECONDED BY PERSSON, COUNCIL ADOPT THE RESOLUTION AS READ. CARRIED. The following ordinance was presented for second and final reading and adoption: IOW %NO June 26,2006 Sire Renton City Council Minutes' Page 223 ADMINISTRATIVE Chief Administrative Officer Jay Covington reviewed a written administrative REPORT report summarizing the City's recent progress towards goals and work programs adopted as part of its business plan for 2006 and beyond. Items noted included: * Red,white, and blue decorations will adorn Gene Coulon Memorial Beach Park and spectacular fireworks will reflect off Lake Washington for the 2006 Freddie's Club of Renton Fabulous Fourth of July. The schedule of events kicks off mid-morning with the Chrome Classic July 4th Car Show, and culminates with a public fireworks display at 10:15 p.m. * The City will begin construction of the roadway and infrastructure improvements in support of The Landing project in July, with construction expected to be substantially completed by September 2007. * Over 50 Waste Management garbage trucks rolled through Renton neighborhoods last Saturday collecting everything from mattresses and furniture, to scrap wood and carpeting. This week, over 100 residents will have their appliances picked up at the curbside and recycled. Solid Waste: Clean Sweep Councilwoman Nelson noted the comments she received regarding the success Program of the garbage collection event last Saturday, and she thanked everyone involved for continuing the Clean Sweep program. In response to Councilman Clawson's inquiry regarding the scheduled curbside recycling of appliances, Planning/Building/Public Works Administrator Gregg Zimmerman indicated that the deadline for residents to sign up and arrange for their appliances to be picked up was last week. He offered his contact information, saying that he would find out if any after-deadline requests could be accommodated. CONSENT AGENDA Items on the consent agenda are adopted by one motion which follows the listing. Council Meeting Minutes of Approval of Council meeting minutes of 6/19/2006. Council concur. 6/19/2006 Plat: Ridgeview Court, Development Services Division recommended approval, with conditions, of the Bremerton Ave NE, FP-06-012 Ridgeview Court Final Plat; 20 single-family lots on 2.4 acres located at Bremerton Ave. NE (FP-06-012). Council concur. (See page 226 for resolution.) Planning: 2005 Countywide Economic Development, Neighborhoods and Strategic Planning Department Planning Policies Amendments recommended adoption of a resolution ratifying the 2005 amendments to the Growth Management Planning Council's Countywide Planning Policies. Council concur. (See page 226 for resolution.) Plat: Highlands Park, Vesta Hearing Examiner recommended approval, with conditions, of the Highlands Ave SE,PP-05-124 Park Preliminary Plat; 73 single-family lots on 18.13 acres located at 115 Vesta Ave. SE(PP-05-124). Council concur. CAG: 05-144, Benson Rd S, Transportation Systems Division submitted CAG-05-144,Benson Rd. S. (Main Dennis R Craig Construction Ave. S. to S. 26th St.); and requested approval of the project, authorization for final pay estimate in the amount of$121,479.87, commencement of 60-day lien period, and release of retainage in the amount of$24,271.05 to Dennis R. Craig Construction, Inc., contractor, if all required releases are obtained. Council concur. elseY OF RENTON COUNCIL AGENDAI'AILL AI#: c:1,1 , ' . Submitting Data: For Agenda of: June 26, 2006 Dept/Div/Board.. Economic Development, Neighborhoods and Strategic Planning Staff Contact Rebecca Lind(ext. 6588) Agenda Status Consent Subject: Public Hearing.. Correspondence.. Ratification of the 2005 Amendments to the Ordinance Countywide Planning Policies Resolution X Old Business Exhibits: New Business Issue Paper Study Sessions Resolution Information King County Correspondence King County Signature Reports with attached GMPC Motion Reports and King County Staff Reports Recommended Action: Approvals: Council Concur. Legal Dept X Finance Dept Other Fiscal Impact: NA Expenditure Required... Transfer/Amendment Amount Budgeted Revenue Generated Total Project Budget City Share Total Project.. SUMMARY OF ACTION: The Growth Management Planning Council (GMPC) and Metropolitan King County Council completed review of amendments to the Countywide Planning Policies (CPP) in April 2006. These amendments are now presented to the Renton City Council for ratification. Two issues are addressed in the 2005 CPP Amendments. • Motion 05-01 designates South Lake Union as an Urban Center. • Motion 05-02 corrects an error in mapping a 30.3 acre area within the Kent PAA that was inadvertently shown as part of the City of SeaTac PAA. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Adopt a Resolution supporting GMPC Motions 05-01 and 05-02. Amend the Countywide Planning Policies. H:\EDNSP\Regional Issues\GMPC\CPPs\05CPPAmendmentAgendabilldoc.doc (VY 0 ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT, %, + NEIGHBORHOODS, AND STRATEGIC PLANNING DEPARTMENT MEMORANDUM DATE: June 16, 2006 TO: Randy Corman, Council President Members of the Renton City Council VIA: 40-Kathy Keolker,Mayor FROM: A P Alex Pietsch, Administrator STAFF CONTACT: Rebecca Lind(ext. 6588) SUBJECT: Ratification of 2005 Amendment to the Countywide Planning Policies ISSUE: Should the City Council ratify the Growth Management Council's ratification of the Growth Management Planning Council(GMPC)proposed 2005 amendments to the Countywide Planning Policies (CPPs). RECOMMENDATION: Adopt a resolution ratifying the amendments. BACKGROUND SUMMARY: The CPPs are intended to provide a policy framework for all jurisdictions' comprehensive plans in order to provide the regional planning and coordination among local governments required by the Growth Management Act(GMA). The CPPs set forth guidance for the location of growth and infrastructure investment in the region and establish specific employment and housing targets for each jurisdiction. Jurisdictions must adopt land use and zoning to accommodate these targets in their respective plans and development regulations. The 2005 amendments do not affect Renton, but do facilitate Growth Management planning in other jurisdictions through the Countywide Planning Policies (CPP). The GMPC approved these amendments in September 2005 and the Metropolitan King County Council adopted and ratified them on behalf of unincorporated King County, May 3, 2006. To become effective, amendments must be ratified by at least 30 percent of the city and county governments representing 70 percent of the population of King H:\EDNSP\Regional Issues\GMPC\CPPs\2005 Ratification Issue Paper.doc Randy Corman *no ,ti por Page 2 of 2 June 16,2006 County. Jurisdictions opposing the amendments are required to deny the ratification by July 24, 2006. Failure to act is deemed the equivalent of ratification. CONCLUSION The proposed 2005 amendments to the CPP are consistent with the GMA. Ratification of the amendment package is recommended. While it is not necessary to take formal action, passage of a resolution puts Renton on the record as supporting the amendments and provides a way to track Renton's position in the future. h:\ednsp\regional issues\gmpc\cpps\2005 ratification issue paper.doc CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON, RATIFYING AMENDMENTS TO THE COUNTYWIDE PLANNING POLICIES. WHEREAS, the Growth Management Act, RCW 36.70A.210 mandates the development and adoption of Countywide Planning Policies for King County; and WHEREAS, King County, the City of Seattle, the City of Bellevue and the Suburban Cities of King County have met jointly as the Growth Management Planning Council (GMPC)to develop and recommend Countywide Planning Policies; and WHEREAS, the City of Renton has ratified the Countywide Planning Policies and subsequent amendments; and WHEREAS, Countywide Planning Policy FW-1, Step 9, provides for an amendment process to change the Planning Policies as may be necessary from time to time; and WHEREAS, on April 24, 2006, the Metropolitan King County Council ratified the proposed amendments to the King County Countywide Planning Policies, including: 1) GMPC Motion 05-01, Amendment to the Potential Annexation Area Map correcting an error on the interim PAA map by deleting a 30.3 acre area from the City of Tukwila's PAA and adding this area to the City of Kent's PAA; and 2) GMPC Motion 05-02, Amendment designating the the South Lake Union area of Seattle as an Urban Center as defined in the CPPs; and wr RESOLUTION NO. WHEREAS, the amendment process requires ratification of proposed amendments by at least 30 percent of the City and County governments representing 70 percent of the population in King County; NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON, DOES RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS: SECTION I. The above findings are true and correct in all respects. SECTION II. The best interests and general welfare of the City of Renton would be served by ratification of Ordinance 15426 (GMPC Motions 05-01 and 05-02), as approved by the King County Council and the Growth Management Planning Council. PASSED BY THE CITY COUNCIL this day of 2006. Bonnie I. Walton, City Clerk APPROVED BY THE MAYOR this day of 2006. Kathy Keolker, Mayor Approved as to form: Lawrence J. Warren, City Attorney RES.1199:6/21/06:ma 2 iit King County May 15, 2006 MAY 1 7 406 The Honorable Kathy Keolker Wheeler City of Renton ir ` NC _I 1055 South Grady Way 1` $�� Renton, WA 98055 Dear M Ke I - / heeler: We are pleased to fo, and for your consideration and ratification the enclosed amendments to - .ing County Countywide Planning Policies (CPP). On April 24, 200. a Metropolitan King County Council approved and ratified amendments on behalf of unincorporated King County. Copies of the King County Council staff report, ordinance and Growth Management Planning Council motions are enclosed to assist you in your review of these amendments. • Ordinance No. 15426, GMPC Motion Nos. 05-1 and 05-02, amending the Countywide Planning Policies by amending the interim potential annexation areas map and ratifying the amended Countywide Planning Policies for unincorporated King County. In accordance with the Countywide Planning Policies, FW-1, Step 9, amendments become effective when ratified by ordinance or resolution by at least 30 percent of the city and county governments representing 70 percent of the population of King County according to the interlocal agreement. A city will be deemed to have ratified the amendments to the Countywide Planning Policies unless, within 90 days of adoption by King County, the city takes legislative action to disapprove the amendments. Please note that the 90-day deadline for this amendment is July 24, 2006. If you adopt any legislation relative to this action, please send a copy of the legislation by the close of business, July 24, 2006, to Anne Noris, Clerk of the Council, W1039 King County Courthouse, 516 Third Avenue, Seattle, WA 98104. If you have any questions about the amendments or ratification process, please contact Paul Reitenbach, Senior Policy Analyst, King County Department of Development and Environmental Services, at 206-296-6705, or Rick Bautista, Council Staff, King County Council, at 206-296-0329. Thank you for your prompt attention to this matter. Sincerely, ar Phillip: I hair Ron Sims - ropolit. ng County Council King County Executive Enclosures c ing County City Planning Directors Suburban Cities Association Stephanie Warden, Director, Department of Development and Environmental Services (ODES) Paul Reitenbach, Senior Policy Analyst, DOES Rick Bautista, Council Staff, Growth Management & Natural Resources Committee (GM&NR) KING COUNTY 1200 King County Courthouse 516 Third Avenue Seattle,WA-98104 Signature Report April 24, 2006 Ordinance 15426 Proposed No. 2006-0074.1 Sponsors Constantine 1 AN ORDINANCE adopting amendments to the 2 Countywide Planning Policies; amending the interim 3 potential annexation areas map and ratifying the amended 4 Countywide Planning Policies for unincorporated King 5 County; and amending Ordinance 10450, Section 3, as 6 amended, and K.C.C. 20.10.030 and Ordinance 10450, 7 Section 4, as amended, and K.C.C. 20.10.040. 8 9 10 BE IT ORDAINED BY THE COUNCIL OF KING COUNTY: 11 SECTION 1. Findings. The council makes the following findings: 12 A. The metropolitan King County council adopted and ratified the Growth 13 Management Planning Council recommended King County 2012 - Countywide Planning 14 Policies (Phase I) in July 1992, under Ordinance 10450. 15 B. The metropolitan King County council adopted and ratified the Phase II 16 amendments to the Countywide Planning Policies on August 15, 1994, under Ordinance 17 11446. 1 Ordinance 15426 **.r° `"" 18 C. The Growth Management Planning Council met on September 21, 2005 and 19 voted to recommend amendments to the King County Countywide Planning Policies, 20 amending the interim potential annexation areas map as shown in Attachment A to this 21 ordinance and designating South Lake Union an Urban Center as shown on Attachment B 22 to this ordinance. 23 SECTION 2. Ordinance 10450, Section 3, as amended, and K.C.C. 20.10.030 are 24 each hereby amended to read as follows: 25 Phase IL 26 A. The Phase II Amendments to the King County 2012 Countywide Planning 27 Policies attached to Ordinance 11446 are hereby approved and adopted. 28 B. The Phase II Amendments to the King County 2012 -Countywide Planning 29 Policies are amended, as shown by Attachment 1 to Ordinance 12027. 30 C. The Phase II Amendments to the King County 2012 - Countywide Planning 31 Policies are amended, as shown by Attachment 1 to Ordinance 12421. 32 D. The Phase II Amendments to the King County 2012 - Countywide Planning 33 Policies are amended, as shown by Attachments 1 and 2 to Ordinance 13260. 34 E. The Phase II Amendments to the King County 2012 - Countywide Planning 35 Policies are amended, as shown by Attachments 1 through 4 to Ordinance 13415. 36 F. The Phase II Amendments to the King County 2012 - Countywide Planning 37 Policies are amended, as shown by Attachments 1 through 3 to Ordinance 13858. 38 G. The Phase II Amendments to the King County 2012—Countywide Planning 39 Policies are amended, as shown by Attachment 1 to Ordinance 14390. 2 Ordinance 15426 .1 40 H. The Phase II Amendments to the King County 2012—Countywide Planning 41 Policies are amended, as shown by Attachment 1 to Ordinance 14391. 42 I. The Phase II Amendments to the King County 2012—Countywide Planning 43 Policies are amended, as shown by Attachment 1 to Ordinance 14392. 44 J. The Phase II Amendments to the King County 2012 - Countywide Planning 45 Policies are amended, as shown by Attachment 1 to Ordinance 14652. 46 K. The Phase II Amendments to the King County 2012 -Countywide Planning 47 Policies are amended, as shown by Attachments 1 through 3 to Ordinance 14653. 48 L. The Phase II Amendments to the King County 2012 - Countywide Planning 49 Policies are amended, as shown by Attachment 1 to Ordinance 14654. 50 M. The Phase II Amendments to the King County 2012 - Countywide Planning 51 Policies are amended, as shown by Attachment 1 to Ordinance 14655. 52 N. The Phase II Amendments to the King County 2012 - Countywide Planning 53 Policies are amended, as shown by Attachments 1 and 2 to Ordinance 14656. 54 O. The Phase II amendments to the King County 2012—Countywide Planning 55 Policies are amended, as shown by Attachment A to Ordinance 14844. 56 P. The Phase II Amendments to the King County 2012 - Countywide Planning 57 Policies are amended as shown by Attachments A, B and C to Ordinance 15121. 58 Q. The Phase II Amendments to the King County 2012 - Countywide Planning 59 Policies are amended, as shown by Attachment A to Ordinance 15122. 60 R. The Phase II Amendments to the King County 2012 - Countywide Planning 61 Policies are amended, as shown by Attachment A to Ordinance 15123. 3 Ordinance 15426 sir°'` 62 S. Phase II Amendments to the King County 2012 - Countywide Planning 63 Policies are amended, as shown by Attachments A and B to Ordinance xxx. 64 SECTION 3. Ordinance 10450, Section 4, as amended, and K.C.C. 20.10.040 are 65 each hereby amended to read as follows: 66 Ratification for unincorporated King County. 67 A. Countywide Planning Policies adopted by Ordinance 10450 for the purposes 68 specified are hereby ratified on behalf of the population of unincorporated King County. 69 B. The amendments to the Countywide Planning Policies adopted by Ordinance 70 10840 are hereby ratified on behalf of the population of unincorporated King County. 71 C. The amendments to the Countywide Planning Policies adopted by Ordinance 72 11061 are hereby ratified on behalf of the population of unincorporated King County. 73 D. The Phase II amendments to the King County 2012 Countywide Planning 74 Policies adopted by Ordinance 11446 are hereby ratified on behalf of the population of 75 unincorporated King County. 76 E. The amendments to the King County 2012 -Countywide Planning Policies, as 77 shown by Attachment 1 to Ordinance 12027 are hereby ratified on behalf of the 78 population of unincorporated King County. 79 F. The amendments to the King County 2012 - Countywide Planning Policies, as 80 shown by Attachment 1 to Ordinance 12421, are hereby ratified on behalf of the 81 population of unincorporated King County. 82 G. The amendments to the King County 2012 - Countywide Planning Policies, as 83 shown by Attachments 1 and 2 to Ordinance 13260, are hereby ratified on behalf of the 84 population of unincorporated King County. 4 Ordinance 15426 85 H. The amendments to the King County 2012 - Countywide Planning Policies, as 86 shown by Attachment 1 through 4 to Ordinance 13415, are hereby ratified on behalf of 87 the population of unincorporated King County. 88 I. The amendments to the King County 2012 - Countywide Planning Policies, as 89 shown by Attachments 1 through 3 to Ordinance 13858, are hereby ratified on behalf of 90 the population of unincorporated King County. 91 J. The amendments to the King County 2012 - Countywide Planning Policies, as 92 shown by Attachment 1 to Ordinance 14390, are hereby ratified on behalf of the 93 population of unincorporated King County. 94 K. The amendments to the King County 2012 -Countywide Planning Policies, as 95 shown by Attachment 1 to Ordinance 14391, are hereby ratified on behalf of the 96 population of unincorporated King County. 97 L. The amendments to the King County 2012 -Countywide Planning Policies, as 98 shown by Attachment 1 to Ordinance 14392, are hereby ratified on behalf of the 99 population of unincorporated King County. 100 M. The amendments to the King County 2012 - Countywide Planning Policies, as 101 shown by Attachment 1 to Ordinance 14652, are hereby ratified on behalf of the 102 population of unincorporated King County. 103 N. The amendments to the King County 2012 - Countywide Planning Policies, as 104 shown by Attachments 1 through 3 to Ordinance 14653, are hereby ratified on behalf of 105 the population of unincorporated King County. 5 Ordinance 15426 ,,ir 106 O. The amendments to the King County 2012 - Countywide Planning Policies, as 107 shown by Attachment 1 to Ordinance 14654, are hereby ratified on behalf of the 108 population of unincorporated King County. 109 P. The amendments to the King County 2012 - Countywide Planning Policies, as 110 shown by Attachment 1 to Ordinance 14655, are hereby ratified on behalf of the 111 population of unincorporated King County. 112 Q. The amendments to the King County 2012 -Countywide Planning Policies, as 113 shown by Attachments 1 and 2 to Ordinance 14656,are hereby ratified on behalf of the 114 population of unincorporated King County. 115 R. The amendments to the King County 2012—Countywide Planning Policies, as 116 shown by Attachment A to Ordinance 14844, are hereby ratified on behalf of the 117 population of unincorporated King County. 118 S. The amendments to the King County 2012 -Countywide Planning Policies, as 119 shown by Attachments A, B and C to Ordinance 15121, are hereby ratified on behalf of 120 the population of unincorporated King County. 121 T. The amendments to the King County 2012 -Countywide Planning Policies, as 122 shown by Attachment A to Ordinance 15122, are hereby ratified on behalf of the 123 population of unincorporated King County. 124 U. The amendments to the King County 2012 - Countywide Planning Policies, as 125 shown by Attachment A to Ordinance 15123, are hereby ratified on behalf of the 126 population of unincorporated King County. 6 Ordinance 15426 {rw __r 127 V. The amendments to the King County 2012-Countywide Planning Policies, as 128 shown by Attachments A and B to Ordinance xxx, are hereby ratified on behalf of the 129 population of unincorporated King County. 130 Ordinance 15426 was introduced on 3/6/2006 and passed by the Metropolitan King County Council on 4/24/2006, by the following vote: Yes: 8 -Mr. Phillips,Mr. von Reichbauer,Ms. Lambert, Mr. Dunn, Mr. Gossett,Ms. Hague, Ms. Patterson and Mr. Constantine No: 0 Excused: 1 - Mr. Ferguson KING COUNTY COUNCIL KING COUNTY, WASH N Larry Philli ,Chair ATTEST: T C-- 6,. ..)„‘&.),,,vce,:u Anne Noris,Clerk of the Council "‹ ,-" z:- c,.) : APPROVED this day of 2006. `` ' ' ' 4 ...'Ron Sims,County Executive Attachments A.Motion No.05-1 and Map,B.Motion No.05-2 and Map 7 15426 6 2006 ... 074 4 9/21/05 Attachment A Sponsored By: Executive Committee /pr 1 MOTION NO. 05-1 2 A MOTION to amend the interim Potential Annexation Area 3 map in the Countywide Planning Policies. 4 5 6 7 WHEREAS,Countywide Planning Policies LU-31 and LU-32 anticipate the collaborative 8 designation of Potential Annexation Areas(PAA)and the eventual annexation of these 9 areas by cities. 10 11 WHEREAS,the attached PAA map amendment corrects an error on the interim PAA map 12 by deleting a 30.3 acre area from the City of Tukwila's PAA and adding this area to the 13 City of Kent PAA. 14 15 WHEREAS,the attached PAA map amendment is supported by the City of Tukwila and 16 the City of Kent. 17 18 BE IT RESOLVED THAT THE GROWTH MANAGEMENT PLANNING COUNCIL OF 19 KING COUNTY HEREBY MOVES AS FOLLOWS: 20 21 22 1. Amend the Interim Potential Annexation Area Map by including the 30.3 -acre area in 23 the Potential Annexation Area of the City of Kent. 24 25 2. This amendment is recommended to the Metropolitan King County Council and the 26 Cities of King County for adoption and ratification. 27 28 ADOPTED by the Growth Management Planning Council of King County on 29 September 21,2005 in open session and signed by the chair of the GMPC. 30 31 32 33 Ron Sims,Chair, Growth Management Planning Council 34 - 1 - ....... „ 1 5 42 6 . ,.... • , _,...... 2 0 C it.---) •_, • 7 4chment A Proposed Amendment ... D Interim PM Map Amendment lung countY H .., =I Proposed Area Th.. • ,,,,, ..Pa...t. •.,...... " gol*. "1..."7..„,„Wk.*... ****reio. - C.".** :17: ,,Z irodk.14„: 1,7-7.71 Incorporated Areas .gt b.Irobb 1.,Wei P.....4 i., n, 0...a,,, ft. .. 1:- .-! .............., d.,....ft:W.1_.....„....a -------.76,1..aft ftftaft•...,..,,,,a aft ft,. ......aft „„ii.may. or *f*****......i.d_ •...„,,,,,*a.. infonm147 MO map. ..., 0 1,000 2A° :WO 500 freet Wag 6111117:*M w,..,r•Sielig...,...,„en t I Him/ --,L:-.Y.''-:.'our an 11111 ..:• ---•:±,!,..Lit''...'''''",'''(`-' g_....„„.._ tia P.;;::71 ,i,,1:,'L.,-,,,p li NM ... • ommi I= :.?..111/...g, I :MI -- / I .....r.14rijra..-:-,_ .... ..mi_ 1( UtIRIP:;'%i;:; fi :,i'VE ifiV44-.;'.---'',42geri''"- ... _._.. .,..,L.-....,E.:•.•,•.r -• ,,,. ..10:virilk.:E.:,,!-: §E! wer:t2.?•iu:.zialaliNttir ... .. ..- ,:_.-.7...zr.,:zfiglitiexti 1.4.411iiitii fe't,'51 Vt,-1t111^ $ .v, .....,,7--p-f, - ,''.,.'I,48"."‘i "4•#4,'41.Ilti 2.„.-,,7;,-, ' - —_ :•;!..4.5:,:,.! ,.4..si,::;:o..,: -.:-Z SE morif."-:;:rNiVr,_ Man .Ltt:':.gPA.,..,?f•eilz''.•-,:. .::-:i--.-f.g..,tri.71-0-<ilkW.do---..,. .,,,,,I,L.' r f'i,-4:: ':•,-,117:-'.:' . AIL' it'BE IS1 a 1;;--;'4-"irfi 11'AI i I-; •.''-:4::2'r;:iiitiK.ti trfliat0- ' L:.•---. ..:.:,",.;:3:7..,:.;,...-: ;:.: a F.:.__Ii,IT ,:„Iii,..,..,...i:.: 11.roilw!..•.:„,,,,,,,,iw:!;. stireciAliti ,:....:7,-1.-_,,,..,--I, •- 4; tw_,-•-:---,E,lip.z,-•,,a,1...liok.12 • sEt.,rfl ,, ,,,:. .i..47.- -I-.._IT .-„,-.;5,-; .,:,,,,,,Elig,;.F.I EN, MITA,,,,:hi ...a:-._ :•••- _..a'4,27',1: , .i.-_lir.i:::-..,:!:•:,,,.,,,.:,Ear,•• .-.,..-: ".y.7,11:;',. ., .:,: lsrll.-:' , AP ilitHE ...f,,, .::;.. .-,,,....,:-.,L. .:;.i.L. . ::-. ••• ,'.' ;, ..t1p7,1:-:17-4474,ts--A4i....,._..,..7- .-iok ._ , / 1 t; am=NI ...._I aft I folliiilik-IM. s _:Wfc-:--r- :47:4- -7rj.T1, 4: ::c":7• -t--Ti;':ite ••4•a.gm -:,- k.E4FA. .f. .,,,U,, ik.;4-*-1i.L',Z. .-•.:1!.TJAlikoi!-Ii,:.:,..,4:-Ii.,.:: wpwla jr,,,i,i,:..:,:,..,...w ,..iter."r......A E.fr.'$0510P4' MI.--., K\,2.--.:'./Mitiles„1:.., f1:MIM'ill .-..-4.1.!:!! ::: . '\ .._ *,L.,:..,,mi 1 ity VP/A. ltilinff,•"--1! ,H.•,7" .__ gits:iii_0,11n „._,_,-. 111.7,7.-•le,7,- -i3,: ,•,,,-ziv: :.. -----..,, ,..----::vginfiringati : :F. ,'-:.;.::,i-:: , , .,--: 1 .. amm ,...01:-='if:!;.!s:v4ims..::*,.., -,,. •::: ::- ,41.fili:g t0. ' -...'.-..i:WSW** ,._. . ..-_,....-_.•, „:• -:• ,:,-L.,- --._.L.,, - i:) ' IIIII I 1.1431mattErt Mal jfr;::,ful.il!I „,::.LL i.-.:: .64,,,,J'.. ..::ilappingir •:01,igta riMate:' i'a.1,1111111111111PE i ":12.2]:?-4: 412171 0,_---;Lia: '41VGIM'ME& 1114111"1.' •' III. 7k2a: , .,...„1111410//iitt •",.-..:.'. :- ==.-------. i..-":i'.', •: I 1' ''''-r-111111Vinian'Lgla:.-''''.. • - - -:.F41;:;, ii"'"''''''''''L` ... . ,!.ov..-7,RBREINFI me nal 0,.....V3",•.''7:., .,-.„NI,_.:•:-, ,t-,:•"-,--:,11,-.'•L'::'7,7)—• ,•.-... - 41PVIAM: ..,......--,..'aim' . . inF. 4r. •• .. • ....---.:,,,_:.2.,„±:::.=:.,,---,7,..,--.: -'•i..-marg-74 40.:.1;4171ilt• ' Iffinsti _.•..-- • '...-.' rori,, •Ai, ::::,: ....- ii k...-::::Li-,:.;.:7„;•„-.-4.,,,,•El ..,..:.._. L.„'...-:70 ill I, JI,lit •- ea..: : . 1161,,,,WE , ' 1111i1. ,,,,, 4... . All . I"MI'15 . tr'191111111/1#111:j1 hIT'Ll. .--'.::4:4 \9t ,-;:: 117:': lig _'''-'7_1Erlitili;t.tti''' . .:--i]_ ia-illg---•45/M:,..„,„:,,,t„titil it : ::in._ . ..ii.,., , 4.,..„,,„„._. it( . ... ... ..- A r-4--g: 1,: Agew.::-.::,,.: i.wa..f. .,.a., tE14191 HIPPief-:4..' : 1 N' ilr' ... 1,.:,::'Ansivms° Aiti-JZ;z.:t.:: ,•:.':_I--47:::::,'g 17,_4±=• .-:.:_:.;,,'.• :•-'!.:41•••:-j:11 en OR.:itz A0w:i :;..,: :2: .,,,,,,, .' MialliMr ."."''. We.iit;2.-,. tr.pi MCI FIN 1 i g,imp,::.-'q.47 Ir:41: . ..' Wir 1 — .,., • ... — •- ,d-,1 ' 'ft,-....-,.:,.-.=,-- .. ,-...-..........- r.. • •:. . .. .,..,3M. . —7..-....,'7. ... ' ---.....--: ...—.. .. `.n----"L.-_.... ..,'',._.„I,,.:.,. ._': z,,,,,,,..•_-:L.- in' Pi g•a'j'11-E-iiii.m4,7 4. 1.,r74*-: ,91-040 , . _ • .,• -.:.,-.4..:-,, . . , NIB.,•.':,::,-;::::,,t .,!:".1-ati,.-" A .,,iir..,7N:_er..i...;7::! ..._, _ :,.,,:..„::,•...._::.,7:;::57:1.:.:.„7,:, „T...•,",„.,.::,,,,L„,,.:.:,4..„/ :::::,:is,_,t,.:7._;-:4:11.07,,,,,1::.::.2.:::::: :7.:-:::.:,.f____::;:.,.. ,:,=131:,;:. :. .„.:•:.,... inir:REL -...---;„,I-11.1! -,7Ir2:4alW7 m--W:m'iil11a e§iglarl11.n62r.-.rl.ie-7"fia.,f t-tWJtl4N 2 4i1it.*1!,g41:•,:,:-41t„-,-t.1r-7'ii,.4'.!,a..0-"..1..,•!'.:-15',1:M4_.im-2t1,•=F.--„—.1..1=,3 l 1i.,„r'm--..---:.,-,•-,---:-:.m-!l,j'f:,i.•:,r.---.::- ':,,.-.,.:1,i:.s_,-:.•-„L,e.:I..'_.. i.aP.,m,.&:'iR.:i,I•':,.g'::.:-ef•:'.•::-:--.:.-.•..-L:;I.:.:;:,::':!,-N:::.,E-i-Z.':•-::,:.:L;i.•:•,:,,,-;:P-;:4:i..2-i14::,1i.':,'';1,t-'-4A•'-:'',',2:,'-fd:-:.:i,-!t.:.11dof*4:f:;,:nk•!°K:-.i,:::;i'::1,e-:fu..1„tg!7nt7i,r4.fiqi-riian.F.s:'alEZe'-4.tM.P'r• mmAF1iAMp—i..--::A:',:-lFt::-a.l;1_k:.;1.--7A‘`..ii:.g,',.,.,.:Tt'L-o:-ff:k::L-.':-:P'-:_:--,N.:7:--:!,.,1:‘:..':.l:::"'i,',\:,.1::.2--.•,:30.::,,:::4:.-,-„•i::::::=h,•g.f.Z...'.:--.'::7N-::O:;.)1.-,:k:..:1.;•,„.•,.L:.,Er:'•.,-4i:;-..-..::2.-;..°1.1,i,.-,.;.!.,..-.,,7...:---...1..:_.V..__-..:-,f-,:_?i.i7..*-..:.,,,:1•.•-::-:,.;„i.i..,J:-'1".-•',..i..-4L!.7.!i•,•r•;1:;r..i-•:;'1-:••.:-::.•':..:'i,:.:::-'i:,.0.;:N:.:.i:1-11:1,,1.4•7::7•:I:t:1L.lM,•.e-e2--:=11-i''•L'1..;,•:.-i; . e = - l ""1:10 -. 1,5:.::',74'-1•,ai;,•:-i;•tL::M'-t'.''7:',:.-O.:.•:::'r--:.ST:.7,-2.:H:.-, :6S•=.•-.:H•..- ..H,•,i:: .r,:,11.1.-,7,,,;,T0i.•7,1:,,'.'1,„,.'''-'21-. :.•"-':::'";' -'.... ;''41..:..'-''''-$'1i•'.-V':i:r7...:'1:'.--iiiiiiiiife•.','.,-'.V7i1.'s.:7r,'•.:Q.:;::' -]',L,4:LitillaIR4 L, ii2-7.,, ,::.;,:f,-.:..:.:i„ffi 10:3Nig,44,,-itritINJ!_I-DAt.._,=3::'::--Le.-_:=-,' .::•-•:",'.-*....:,::•7..!•::„-•,..,.. -:- '.,.. -*.''''''''''.ii.--::::,;-:-.#i:,-._.:::i.•J'i,j.:i. :11:21114M.;.,:::',4:1--•.-'•:,!::-'.11 . Mal/Ma.7/ED:irii-,-.:A4 ix r,:r,,m,-.'..::••....--..,,:,L-2:,i::i,.,.._, i:;.?:!:-4-..:L:4-..,Ltv,..g L:A:z.,:;:up.5g,..:.:L ,,i.,oT.:;:f.L.:-,. .;.I:iT..._i:,.!.,4:,-..7iT_,:gi Li I.--7..—,,all.;-.-::L.:-,:..L,.... a 1:1117:P..:Z1.1 41:7 39 7 lil..;1.'-•--7 IF iii I'i:i'ji Ffitlirlik"" :r• :-. .. :.:71 •1".i......7'1:'-'. • . • :I:'•-:;'• '-':!L'::-'• .-...!Nil Mint 51 ) IVIIIIIE Ell:Ect VI rurid. i:::.'-f: • ',.1!! '''''''''L' '''.4';,:.,,,,:,: ii:E'•••::::..2F-';.!:*.g i!:;' '."-;-;_'.',:•:.!•2;q.:.:4!,.•.:.1--.Li,•::•.'L-.:,.L. .-5,.':*4:5-!1..::1%.:,',4' ..Tt -— ......,,,LI", j::17,111.1 L.''q.•• VAL1.4VE.'.:j:13;: l.TIYYZ..,!Z:'....• '.:'''''''-'''''''''''''' : . - * - -.: fiiilf:inf;•,•,:-;ifsafaillits m611,,,,,,Emin! ygisq.:::„;:: ..o.ii.m.',1 .,,,,:41.%.% rh r :1 ,:.,4 :,.4.0* ::,,, :illt„,,...,7::,Imin.vi.,„..._,,.,:_li !.....t.s. ;.4.,;:ii..;:,,...7 ,71a, tk lifit:Orkd itALITriAaNikttlatp_. . -.,,, --.•-- ..1:-'.,. :,-_:1!'.077.,..1_:4-rtl:';'1:77;..7 ,-- .: -L.. tglifira .1.ta-Z-r,--' '1-2 lga lir gr •4 n:iii''''741 7.'..:::::•:'-: :_.`•,- .:-.-::.•:ig:..,:.,•:, :,.•!:,,:i.fi'..1:. :'!..',:',iF::' .::'-.•j:..:.-7gi•rii'. ..L-- —- • t-- :, - • • , 1 iii.IF,le Pirlir ., •_.,F-i..„-.4, -...,--,..,!-. - - - . '''! '7' .-..-••r-211 se,...., .., ,.„ . 15426 2i (Y6 9/21/05 Attachment B Sponsored By: Executive Committee /th 1 MOTION NO. 05-02 2 A MOTION to amend the Countywide Planning Policies by 3 designating the South Lake Union area of Seattle as an Urban 4 Center. South Lake Union is added to the list of Urban 5 Centers following Countywide Planning Policy LU-39. 6 7 8 9 WHEREAS, a goal of the Growth Management Act is to encourage development in Urban I0 Areas where adequate public facilities exist or can be provided in an efficient manner; 11 12 WHEREAS,Policy LU-39 of the Countywide Planning Policies of King County describes 13 the criteria for Urban Center designation; 14 15 WHEREAS, Policy LU-40 of the Countywide Planning Policies of King County describes 16 standards for planned land uses within Urban Centers; 17 18 WHEREAS, the City of Seattle has demonstrated that South Lake Union meets the criteria 19 for designation as an Urban Center, and 20 21 WHEREAS,King County Comprehensive Plan Policy U-108 supports the development of 22 Urban Centers to meet the region's needs for housing,jobs, services,culture and recreation 23 and to promote health. 24 25 BE IT RESOLVED THAT THE GROWTH MANAGEMENT PLANNING COUNCIL OF 26 KING COUNTY HEREBY MOVES AS FOLLOWS: 27 28 29 1. The South Lake Union area of Seattle is designated as an Urban Center_ The list of 30 Urban Centers following Countywide Planning Policy LU-39 is modified to include 31 South Lake Union. 32 33 2. This amendment is recommended to the Metropolitan King County Council and the 34 Cities of King County for adoption and ratification. 35 36 - 1 - 1 54 2 6 1 ADOPTED by the Growth Management Planning Council of King County on 2 September 21,2005 in open session and signed by the chair of the GMPC. 3 4 5 6 Ron Sims, Chair, Growth Management Planning Council 7 - 2 - 15 2OO6O74 South Lake Union Boundaries Lake Union o: • Uptown/ - Seattle Center Mercer Street Urban Center • South Lake Union Urban Center . 1st Hill — capitol Hill Urban Center _ • Denn Wa Downtown Seattle" • Urbai Center... Parcels Urban Center Boundary City of Seattle-DPD May 19,2005 Park Metropolitan King County Council Growth Management and Unincorporated Areas Committee Revised Staff Report Agenda Item: 5 Name: Rick Bautista Proposed Ord: 2006-0074 Date: March 21, 2006 (Adoption of GMPC Motions 05-1 and 05-2) Attending: Paul Reitenbach, DDES SUBJECT: Adopting amendments to the Countywide Planning Policies to correct a mapping error that affects 30 acres of the potential annexation area (PAA)for the City of Kent and to designate South Lake Union as an Urban Center. BACKGROUND: The Growth Management Planning Council and Countywide Planning Policies The Growth Management Planning Council (GMPC) is a formal body comprised of elected officials from King County, Seattle, Bellevue, the Suburban Cities, and Special Districts. The GMPC was created in 1992 by interlocal agreement, in response to a provision in the Washington State Growth Management Act (GMA) requiring cities and counties to work together to adopt Countywide Planning Policies (CPPs). Under GMA, countywide planning policies serve as the framework for each individual jurisdiction's comprehensive plan, and ensure countywide consistency with respect to land use planning efforts. As provided for in the interlocal agreement, the GMPC developed and recommended the CPPs, which were adopted by the King County Council and ratified by the cities. Subsequent amendments to the CPPs follow the same process: recommendation by the GMPC, adoption by the King County Council, and ratification by the cities. Amendments to the CPPs become effective when ratified by ordinance or resolution by at least 30% of the city and county governments representing at least 70% of the population of King County. A city shall be deemed to have ratified an amendment to the CPPs unless, within 90 days of adoption by King County, the city by legislative action disapproves it. SUMMARY: Proposed Ordinance 2006-0074 would adopt the following two motions (05-1 and 05-2) approved by the GMPC in September 2005: • GMPC Motion 05-1 would correct a mapping error that affects 30 acres of the PAA for the City of Kent. • GMPC Motion 05-2 would amend the CPP Policy LU-39by adding South Lake Union to the list of Urban Centers. The ordinance would also ratify the change on behalf of the population of unincorporated King County, as required by Countywide Planning Policy FW-1, Step 9. IOW 4411110 GMPC MOTION 05-1 (CORRECTION TO CITY OF KENT PAA MAP): In 2004, the Interim PAA Map in the Countywide Planning Policies document was amended to reflect the resolution of a disputed portion of the PAA between the cities of SeaTac and Tukwila, wherein the PAAs of each city overlapped. With the adoption of GMPC Motion 04-1, the entire previously disputed area was included within the PAA of the city of Tukwila. However, after the PAA map was amended and in the process of being ratified, the city of Kent pointed out a mapping error at the south margin of the previously disputed area. A 30.3-acre area that is actually within the PAA of the city of Kent was inadvertently shown as part of the city of SeaTac PAA.. The Tukwila Planning Director and Kent Planning Manager agree that this 30.3-acre area should be included in Kent's PAA. Motion 05-1 adds the 30.3 acre area to the city of Kent PAA. and the remainder of the previously disputed area remains within Tukwila's PAA. GMPC MOTION 05-2 (SOUTH LAKE UNION URBAN CENTER DESIGNATION): The City of Seattle requests that the King County Council amend the Countywide Planning Policies to add its South Lake Union area to the list of Urban Centers in Policy LU-39. The city has followed the correct process for obtaining such a designation, starting with amending its own plans, policies and capital improvement programs, and also by securing the recommendation of the Growth Management Planning Council, which indicated its approval through the unanimous adoption of GMPC Motion 05-2 on September 21, 2005. The final steps in the center designation process are approval by the King County Council and ratification by the cities (see background section for an explanation of the ratification process). Requirements for Urban Center Designation The Countywide Planning Policies describe Urban Centers as areas of concentrated employment and housing, with direct service by high-capacity transit and a wide range of other land uses. Collectively, they are expected to account for up to one half of King County's employment growth and one quarter of household growth over the next 20 years. The list of Urban Centers in Countywide Planning Policy LU-39 currently includes: • Bellevue CBD • Downtown Auburn • Downtown Burien • Federal Way CBD • Kent CBD • Redmond CBD • Renton CBD • Seattle CDD • Seattle Center • First Hill/Capitol Hill • University District • • • Northgate • SeaTac CBD • Tukwila CBD • Totem Lake In order to be designated as an Urban Center,jurisdictions must meet specific criteria in the Countywide Planning Policies, including having planned land uses to accommodate: • A minimum of 15,000 jobs within one-half mile of a transit center; • At a minimum, an average of 50 employees per gross acre; and • At a minimum, an average of 15 households per acre. In addition to these requirements, Policy LU-40 states that fully realized Urban Centers shall be characterized by the following: • Clearly defined geographic boundaries; • An intensity/density of land uses sufficient to support effective and rapid transit; • Pedestrian emphasis within the Center; • Emphasis on superior urban design which reflects the local community; • Limitations on single-occupancy vehicle usage during peak commute hours; • A broad array of land uses and choices within those land uses for employees and residents; • Sufficient public open spaces and recreational opportunities; and • Uses which provide both daytime and nighttime activities in the Center. GMPC Recommendation The GMPC, through the adoption of Motion 05-1, has declared that the City of Seattle has demonstrated its commitment to developing a fully realized Urban Center at South Lake Union as envisioned in the Countywide Planning Policies. A complete analysis of the city's proposal as presented to the GMPC is included as Attachment 4 to this staff report. Specific factors leading to the GMPC action are that South Lake Union: • Is adjacent to three of Seattle's existing urban centers, and together with those other centers, forms the geographic basis of the City's Center City strategy. This strategy aims to attract and accommodate high-quality urban development serving both the region's and the City's goals. • Is in a key location within the regional transportation system, between 1-5 and SR99. • Contains a wide mix of uses, including major employers like the Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, the Seattle Times, and PEMCO Insurance, along with a growing amount of residential uses. • Already exceeds the CPPs' employment criteria, for both the number and density of jobs. The area currently has over 19,000 jobs, which is about 57 jobs per acre, compared to the criteria of 50 jobs per acre. The City has established a growth target for South Lake Union of 16,000 additional jobs over the next 20 years, which would increase the density to over 100 jobs per acre. • Is being planned to accommodate an additional 8,000 housing units over the next 20 years, producing a density of 27 housing units per acre within the Center, compared to the criteria that calls for 15 units per acre. • Exceeds PSRC's criteria for a regional growth center. There are currently 60 activity units (population + employment per gross acre) in South Lake Union, while the PSRC criteria call for 4800 an ability to achieve 45 activity units. With the City's plans, South Lake Union would reach 127 activity units by the year 2024. • Is being supported as an Urban Center through a coordinated set of City plans, policies, and investments. Seattle's Comprehensive Plan designated the Urban Center, and the City is currently updating the neighborhood plan for South Lake Union to meet the CPP criteria. The neighborhood plan includes transportation, parks and other capital improvement plans, as well as a historic building inventory and guidance for the provision of human services and public safety. • Has zoning and neighborhood-specific design guidelines that encourage pedestrian-oriented, mixed-use development. • Will have a new streetcar connection to Downtown Seattle, funded largely by property owners in the neighborhood. Council staff concurs that the city proposal meets the requirements in the Countywide Planning Policies for designation as an Urban Center. ATTA MENTS: 1. Pro •sed Ordinance 2006-0074 2. GM' Motion 05-1 3. GMPC -otion 05-2 4. GMPC S f report for Motion 05-2 rr CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON RESOLUTION NO. 3744 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON, RATIFYING AMENDMENTS TO THE COUNTYWIDE PLANNING POLICIES. WHEREAS, the Growth Management Act, RCW 36.70A.210, mandates the development and adoption of Countywide Planning Policies for King County;and WHEREAS, King County, the City of Seattle, the City of Bellevue and the Suburban Cities of King County have met jointly as the Growth Management Planning Council (GMPC)to develop and recommend Countywide Planning Policies; and WHEREAS, the City of Renton has ratified the Countywide Planning Policies and subsequent amendments; and WHEREAS, Countywide Planning Policy FW-1, Step 9, provides for an amendment process to change the Planning Policies as may be necessary from time to time; and WHEREAS,on February 14,2005,the Metropolitan King County Council ratified the proposed amendments to the King County Countywide Planning Policies,including: 1) GMPC Motion 04-01,Amendments to the Potential Annexation Area Map affecting lands within Tukwila,Redmond,Enumclaw,Bellevue,Kirkland,and Bear Creek Urban Planned Development within the existing urban growth area,and designating a new Urban Separator in Redmond; 2) GMPC Motion 04-02,Amendments to the Urban Growth Area map,adding lands in Issaquah and Renton PAAs to the Urban Growth Area and amending the Urban Growth Boundary; 1 moimmorimmirmir ' RESOLUTION NO. 3744 3) GMPC Motion 04-03,Amendment designating the Burien downtown as an Urban Center as defined in the CPPs; 4) GMPC Motion 04-04,technical corrections to growth targets for the West Hill unincorporated area,Tukwila,Kent,Pacific and Auburn;and 5) GMPC Motion 04-05,Map amendments changing the Urban Growth Areas Map and Urban Growth Area Boundary to add a 29-acre area to the Covington PAA;and WHEREAS,the amendment process requires ratification of proposed amendments by at least 30 percent of the City and County governments representing 70 percent of the population in King County; NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON,DOES RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS: SECTION I. The above findings are true and correct in all respects. SECTION IL The proposed amendments to the Countywide Planning Policies are consistent with the adopted City Comprehensive Plan and the adopted City Business Plan. SECTION III. The best interests and general welfare of the City of Renton would be served by ratification of Ordinance 15121, 15123, and 15122 (GMPC Motions 04-01,04-02, 04-03, 04-04, 04-05) as approved by the King County Council and the Growth Management Planning Council. PASSED BY THE CITY COUNCIL this 21 s t day of March ,2005. 16367t,0,“ k/GLt Bonnie I.Walton,City Clerk 2 '`'"` RESOLUTION NO. 3744 '°`e. APPROVED BY THE MAYOR this 21 s t day of March ,2005. 7riaLy 4fi-ekti Gt7� _ Kathy K olker-Wheeler,Mayor Approv to form: QM� wrence J. Wane , ity Attorney RES.l 100:3/14/05:ma 3 March 21,2005 See Renton City Council Minutes 'sm.'? Page 99 • Inform the public of the closures and detour routes through mail flyers, community meetings and events, and local news media. • Coordinate closures with affected businesses such as PACCAR and the Renton School District. The Committee further recommended that the resolution regarding this matter be presented for reading and adoption.* Councilwoman Palmer stated that the closures are for infrastructure improvements for the Highlands area, and information about the closures is being dispersed throughout the community. *MOVED BY PALMER, SECONDED BY PERSSON, COUNCIL CONCUR IN THE COMMITTEE REPORT. CARRIED. (See page 100 for resolution.) Utilities Committee Utilities Committee Vice Chair Clawson presented a report regarding the Public Works: Cedar River broodstock collection facility. The Committee recommended concurrence in Broodstock Collection the recommendation to approve the I-405 site as the best location for a (Sockeye Hatchery)Facility, broodstock collection facility within Renton City limits provided that the Seattle Public Utilities Project following issues can be negotiated to the satisfaction of the City: • Seattle Public Utilities (SPU)provides adequate mitigation for impacts of construction and operation of the broodstock facility on City lands and activities, including,but not limited to, impacts on spawning behavior, parks use, aesthetics, surface water,recreation, public safety, riparian habitat,Parks Master Plan, and Narco Rd. maintenance. • Washington State Department of Fish and Wildlife modifies the Hydraulic Project Approval for the dredging project to address potential impacts from the broodstock facility on the City's mitigation requirements. • SPU supports future maintenance dredging and provides monitoring for fish activity at and below the broodstock facility. Upon Council concurrence with this recommendation, staff will pursue negotiations with SPU regarding permitting and construction of the broodstock facility at the I-405 site. MOVED BY CLAWSON, SECONDED BY PERSSON, COUNCIL CONCUR IN THE COMMITTEE REPORT. CARRIED. RESOLUTIONS AND The following resolutions were presented for reading and adoption: ORDINANCES Resolution#3742 A resolution was read setting a public hearing date on 4/18/2005 to vacate a Vacation: Walkway,.NW 6th ten-foot wide platted walkway approximately 187 feet in length,connecting St&Rainier Ave N, VAC-05- NW 6th St. to Rainier Ave. N. (Jack D. Alhadeff,JDA Group; VAC-05-002). 002 MOVED BY CLAWSON, SECONDED BY PALMER, COUNCIL ADOPT THE RESOLUTION AS READ. CARRIED. Resolution#3743 A resolution was read approving the Laurelhurst Phase 1 Final Plat; Plat: Laurelhurst Phase 1, approximately 15.7 acres located in the vicinity of Duvall Ave. NE, west of NE Duvall Ave NE,FP-04-160 2nd St. (FP-04-160). MOVED BY CLAWSON, SECONDED BY PALMER, COUNCIL ADOPT THE RESOLUTION AS READ. CARRIED. Resolution#3744 A resolution was read ratifying the 2004 amendments to the Growth Planning: 2004 Countywide Management Planning Council's Countywide Planning Policies. MOVED BY Planning Policies Amendments BRIERE, SECONDED BY PERSSON, COUNCIL ADOPT THE w M f RESOLUTION AS READ. CARRIED. March 21,2005 Renton City Council Minutes rr'" Page 97 Council Meeting Minutes of Approval of Council meeting minutes of March 14, 2005. Council concur. March 14, 2005 Appeal: Ridgeview Court City Clerk reported appeal of Hearing Examiner's recommendation on the Preliminary Plat, Cliff Ridgeview Court Preliminary Plat (PP-04-131); appeal filed by Sean K. Howe, Williams,PP-04-131 524 2nd Ave., Suite 500, Seattle,98104,representing Cliff Williams of Ridgeview Court,LLC on 3/7/2005, accompanied by required fee. Refer to Planning and Development Committee. Vacation: Walkway,NW 6th City Clerk submitted petition for vacation of portion of unimproved road St&Rainier Ave N, VAC-05- (walkway)between NW 6th St. and Rainier Ave. N.;petitioner Jack D. 002 Alhadeff,95 S.Tobin St.,#201,Renton,98055 (VAC-05-002). Refer to Planning/Building/Public Works Administrator; set public hearing on 4/18/2005 to consider the petition. (See page 99 for resolution setting public hearing.) Community Services: Henry Community Services Department recommended approval of an ordinance Moses Aquatic Center Fees setting new fees and increasing fees at the Henry Moses Aquatic Center. Council concur. (See page 100 for ordinance.) Community Services: Heather Community Services Department recommended approval of a contract in the Downs Park Development amount of$167,148 with J.A. Brennan Associates, PLLC for Heather Downs Architectural Services,JA Park development architectural design services. Council concur. Brennan Associates Lease: Eoscene,200 Mill Community Services Department recommended approval of an amendment to Building(4th &6th Floors), the lease with Eoscene Corporation(LAG-02-003) for space of the 4th and 6th LAG-02-003 floor of the 200 Mill Building for additional space and a lease term extension through 6/30/2010. Refer to Finance Committee. Plat: Laurelhurst Phase 1, Development Services Division recommended approval,with conditions,of the Duvall Ave NE,FP-04-160 Laurelhurst Phase 1 Final Plat; 69 single-family lots on 15.7 acres located on the west side of Duvall Ave.NE at NE 2nd St. (FP-04-160). Council concur. (See page 99 for resolution.) Planning: 2004 Countywide Economic Development,Neighborhoods and Strategic Planning Department Planning Policies Amendments recommended adoption of a resolution ratifying the 2004 amendments to the iA 41P�t( Growth Management Planning Council's Countywide Planning Policies. t Council concur. (See page 99 for resolution.) Annexation: Maplewood Economic Development,Neighborhoods and Strategic Planning Department Addition,Maple Valley Hwy submitted 60% Notice of Intent to annex petition for the proposed Maplewood Addition Annexation, and recommended a public hearing be set on 4/4/2005 to consider the petition and R-8 zoning; 60.5 acres bounded by Maple Valley Hwy. and the Cedar River. Council concur. Plat: Barbee Mill,Lake Hearing Examiner recommended approval, with conditions, of the Barbee Mill Washington Blvd N,PP-02- Preliminary Plat; 115-lot subdivision on 23 acres intended for townhouse units 040 located at 4201 Lake Washington Blvd. N. (PP-02-040). Council concur. Solid Waste: Garbage Legal Division recommended approval of revisions to the garbage ordinance to Ordinance Revisions clarify and add definitions, to make garbage collection mandatory with certain limited exceptions, to add and clarify violations, and to criminalize violations. Refer to Utilities Committee. MOVED BY BRIERE, SECONDED BY PALMER,COUNCIL APPROVE THE CONSENT AGENDA AS PRESENTED. CARRIED. r CA., OF RENTON COUNCIL AGENDALL AI#: �h Submitting Data: For Agenda of: March 21, 2005 Dept/Div/Board.. Economic Development, Neighborhoods and Strategic Planning Staff Contact Rebecca Lind(ext. 6588) Agenda Status Consent Subject: Public Hearing.. Correspondence.. Ratification of the 2004 Amendments to the Ordinance Countywide Planning Policies Resolution X Old Business Exhibits: New Business Issue Paper Study Sessions Resolution Information King County Correspondence Letter from City of Burien King County Signature Reports with attached GMPC Motion Reports and King County Staff Reports Recommended Action: Approvals: Council Concur. Legal Dept...x Finance Dept Other Fiscal Impact: NA Expenditure Required... Transfer/Amendment Amount Budgeted Revenue Generated Total Project Budget City Share Total Project.. SUMMARY OF ACTION: The 2004 Countywide Planning Policy (CPP) amendments were approved by the Growth Management Planning Council September 15, 2004, and ratified by the Metropolitan King County Council on behalf of unincorporated King County on February 14, 2005. Amendments to the CPPs must be ratified by at least 30 percent of the city and county governments representing 70 percent of the population of King County. A city will be deemed to have ratified the amendments unless within 90 days of adoption by King County, the city takes legislative action to disapprove the amendments. There are five issues addressed in the 2004 CPP Amendments. 1) Motion 04-01 Amendments to the Potential Annexation Area (PAA)Map affecting lands within multiple cities (Tukwila, Redmond,Enumclaw, Issaquah) within the existing urban growth area (UGA) and designating a new Urban Separator in Redmond. Lands within the Renton PAA are not included in this action. 2) Motion 04-02 Amendments to the UGA map. One amendment is in Renton's PAA at SE H:\EDNS P\Regional Issues\GMPC\CPPs\04CPPAmendmentAgendabilldoc.doc 184th St. in the Lake Dew neighborhood. This amendment adds existing Renton Christian Center to the UGA. 3) Motion 04-03 Amendment designating the Burien downtown as an Urban Center as defined in the CPPs. The City of Burien is requesting support of this amendment. 4) Motion 04-04 Technical corrections to growth targets for the West Hill unincorporated area, Tukwila, Kent, Pacific and Auburn. The West Hill unincorporated area was mistakenly not assigned a household target during the last round of updates. A household target of 592 units and capacity of 1,913 units is assigned to the West Hill by this action. 5) Motion 04-05 Map amendments changing the PAA of several jurisdictions. Renton is not affected by these changes. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Adopt a Resolution supporting GMPC Motions 04-01,04-02, 04-03, 04-04 and 04-05 amending the Countywide Planning Policies. H:\EDNSP\Regional Issues\GMPC\CPPs\04CPPAmendmentAgendabilldoc.doc law CITY OF RENTON ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT, NEIGHBORHOODS, AND STRATEGIC PLANNING MEMORANDUM DATE: March 14, 2005 TO: Terri Briere, Council President Members of the Renton City Council VIA: . ' Mayor Kathy Keolker-Wheeler FROM: Alex Pietsch, Administrator k1AAP STAFF CONTACT: Rebecca Lind (ext. 6588) SUBJECT: Ratification of 2004 Amendment to the Countywide Planning Policies ISSUE: Ratification of the Growth Management Planning Council (GMPC) proposed amend- ments to the Countywide Planning Policies (CPPs). RECOMMENDATION: Adopt a resolution ratifying the amendments. BACKGROUND SUMMARY: The CPPs are intended to provide a policy framework for all jurisdictions' comprehensive plans in order to provide the regional planning and coordination among local govern- ments required by the Growth Management Act(GMA). The CPPs set forth guidance for the location of growth and infrastructure investment in the region and establish specific employment and housing targets for each jurisdiction. Jurisdictions must adopt land use and zoning to accommodate these targets in their respective plans and development regulations. The GMPC approved these amendments September 15, 2004, and the Metro- politan King County Council adopted them and ratified on behalf of unincorporated King County,February 14, 2005. To become effective, amendments must be ratified by at least 30 percent of the city and county governments representing 70 percent of the population of King County. Jurisdictions opposing the amendments are required to deny the ratification by May 16, 2005. Failure to act is deemed the equivalent of ratification. Renton staff monitored the GMPC review throughout the process. Two of the amend- ments affect Renton. H:\EDNSP\Regional Issues\GMPC\CPPs\2004Amends Ratification Issue.doc Nome ',owe ti 1) Motion 04-02 adds the six-acre Renton Christian Center, located at SE 184th St. to the Renton Potential Annexation Area (PAA), and amends the Urban Growth Boundary to accommodate this change. The City will also be required to amend its Comprehensive Plan in 2005 to reflect this change. The six-acre site is located in the Lake Desire area, and is also included within the proposed Fairwood Incorporation. Property owners requested inclusion in the urban growth boundary to facilitate expansion of the church and school at that location. The map of the affected area is attached to this issue paper as Exhibit 2. King County staff coordinated with Renton staff in the early review of this application. 2) Motion 04-04 is a technical correction to the Household and Growth Targets adopted in 2002. The most significant change is the addition of a 592-unit household target and a reduction in the Renton PAA household target of 237 units. There is also a 1,913-unit household capacity increase listed for the West Hill (identified as Unincorporated King County on Exhibit 1). In 2002, GMA-mandated growth targets were distributed based on four subareas: South County, East County, Sea-Shore, and Rural. Each subarea was assigned a proportional share of total County growth. The West Hill target was inadvertently omitted from the 2002 target distribution. The South County target is 4,935 units for the period 2001- 2022. Identification of a target for the West Hill area resulted in a reallocation of PAA targets through out the South County, but not a change in the total South County target. All other PAA targets were reduced based on the proportional size of each area. The Renton PAA target of 1,976 units was reduced to 1,739 units. Auburn, Des Moines, Federal Way, Kent, Milton. SeaTac and Tukwila also had reductions in PAA targets (see Exhibit 1). The Renton city target is not affected. The West Hill area land capacity was also not accounted for in the 2002 studies. Capacity is the calculation of the amount of growth that could occur based on zoning and market factors for each unique area and does not reflect any negotiated distribution of growth. The addition of capacity for 1,913 units in the West Hill increased South County capacity from 14,039 units to 15,952 units. Other Amendments: The remaining CPP amendments do not affect Renton and provide needed adjustments to facilitate Growth Management Planning in other jurisdictions. A notable change is the designation of Downtown Burien as an Urban Center. The City of Burien demonstrated its commitment to developing an Urban Center consistent with the CPP, and requests support and ratification of the amendment 04-03, designating Downtown Burien an Urban Center. CONCLUSION The proposed 2004 amendments to the CPP are consistent with the GMA and, where there is a direct impact on the City, the amendments support the Vision for Renton identified in its Comprehensive Plan. Ratification of the amendment package is recommended. While it is not necessary to take formal action, passage of a resolution puts Renton on the record as supporting the amendments and provides a way to track Renton's position in the future. H:\EDNSP\Regional Issues\GMPC\CPPs\2004Amends Ratification Issue.doc Unincorporated King County with" the Exhibit 1 South King County column 2004 Revised Table includes only the West Hill area Revised Table LU-1:King County 2001-2022 Household and Employment Targets Housing Household PAA HH Job Capacity in PAA Job Subareas Capacity in Job Target Target PAA* Target PAA Target South King County Algona 298 108 Auburn 6,003 2,635 815 6,084 252 252 Black Diamond 1,099 2,525 Burien 1,552 1,712 Covington 1,373 900 Des Moines 1,576 5 2 1,695 Federal Way 6,188 3,754 1,161 7,481 134 134 Kent 4,284 1,763 546 11,500 287 287 Milton 50 106 33 1,054 Maple Valley 300 804 Normandy Park 100 67 Pacific 721 127 39 103 ---4. Renton 6,198 G,62-4 QZ3D 27,597 458 458 SeaTac 4,478 0 0 9,288 0 0 Tukwila 3,200 7 8 16,000 993 993 �i Unincorp King County 4,935 1,913 <592) 2,582 458 458 Total 42,355 ,• 4,935 89,500 2,582 2,582 East King County Beaux Arts Village 3 - Bellevue 10,117 184 178 40,000 27 27 Bothell 1,751 603 584 2,000 174 174 Clyde Hill 21 - Hunts Point 1 - Issaquah 3,993 827 802 14,000 1 1 Kenmore 2,325 2,800 Kirkland 5,480 770 747 8,800 221 221 Medina 31 - Mercer Island 1,437 800 Newcastle 863 1 1 500 Redmond 9,083 402 390 21,760 21 21 Sammamish 3,842 1,230 Woodinville 1,869 2,000 Yarrow Point 28 - Unincorp King County 6,801 **4,222 **4,099 4,637 **4,193 **4,193 Total 47,645 7,009 6,801 98,527 4,637 4,637 Sea-Shore Lake Forest Park 538 455 Seattle 51,510 92,083 Shoreline 2,651 2,618 Unincorp King County*** 1,670 1,670 1,670 694 1,544 694 Total 56,369 1,670 1,670 95,850 1,544 694 Rural Cities**** Carnation 246 75 Duvall 1,037 1,125 Enumclaw 1,927 1,125 North Bend 636 1,125 Skykomish 20 - Snoqualmie 1,697 1,800 Total 5,563 5,250 King County Total 151,932 289,127 *PAA:Potential Annexation Area in Unincorporated King County Urban Area;**Bear Creek UPD;***North Highline ****The Rural Cities'targets are for the current city limits and rural expansion area for each city. Thus the methodology for adjusting targets as annexations occur is not applicable to the rural cities. Editor's Note: Source for 2001 housing and job capacity figures for PAAs is the 2002 King County Buildable Lands evaluation. Subarea unincorporated targets were allocated to PAAs based on proportional capacity. Revised per Motion 04-4,Sept.2004. 2002 Adopte fable 9,410 Subareas Household HH Capacity PAA HH Job TargetJob Capacity PAA Job Target in PAA* Target in PAA Target South King County Algona 298 Auburn 5,928 2,635 926 Black Diamond 1,099 Burien 1,552 Covington 1,173 Des Moines 1,576 5 2 Federal Way 6,188 3,754 1,320 Kent 4,284 1,763 619 Milton 50 106 37 Maple Valley 300 Normandy Park 100 Pacific 996 127 45 Renton 6,198 5,622 1,976 SeaTac 4,478 14 5 Tukwila 3,200 13 5 Unincorp King County 4,935 Total 42,355 14,039 4.935 East King County Beaux Arts Village 3 Bellevue 10,117 184 178 Bothell 1,751 603 584 Clyde Hill 21 Hunts Point 1 Issaquah 3,993 827 802 Kenmore 2,325 Kirkland 5,480 770 747 Medina 31 Mercer Island 1,437 Newcastle 863 1 1 Redmond 9,083 402 390 Sammamish 3,842 Woodinville 1,869 Yarrow Point 28 Unincorp King County 6,801 **4222 **4099 Total 47,645 7,009 6,801 Sea-Shore Lake Forest Park 538 Seattle 51,510 Shoreline 2,651 Unincorp King County*** 1,670 1,670 1,670 Total 56369 1.670 1.670 Rural Cities Carnation 246 Duvall 1,037 Enumclaw 1,927 North Bend 636 Skykomish 20 Snoquahnie 1,697 Total 5,563 King County Total 151,932 *PAA:Potential Annexation Area in Unincorporated King County Urban Area;**Bear Creek UPD;***North Highline The Rural Cities'targets are for the current city limits and rural expansion area for each city.Thus the methodology for adjusting targets as annexations occur is not applicable to the rural cities. 1 2 UGMPC/02GMPC/Mot02-2.doc - 2 - Exhibit 2 1 5 - Attachment 2 N Proposed Land Use Amendment + .. Renton Christian Center - UGA Amendment In..:.e..ylka,inc..e a....or.._ rp*so.•aw a to..•o•.,woes w shw a o*Agra .e,.0 Mop Coin.,sulks wv..lo a:a,s 1 .:.awe.,...so a+,.Rees as r.a.,+a- .. „= . i:.:..:.r<..:gt:a..:.toe at v:�:4•ww••.:•. w-,G-,+ '" .x• Urban Growth Boundary r r Rural Residential fW.a M b.b 1a M 1sso:wt loaf.._.*Fat i,ue•ast a emura.a,fa s .wf,iy .,w as.:•i,al is. we ono es or a+odes.u.q wow we a«*owe w we ..aws,a.:::*:a. ._.aa'I.`.m r .,••' GrowthBd Urban ,R.G..,- Growth Boundary U m Urban Residential,medium,4-12 du/ac 1 .00 zoo o t .00 eoo King County Owned Fee, Study Area o S Open Space/Recreation �T.NwYYY rY a..e� .....„ .....w..,..„. a oe Y v---.... - r••.... _a _�•� �SIiMRY'r-iir_r•••,va...aI . t jreti� �� ;\ •C�"7-, }low.r • q„� ; �Tr-` i—• ~ ,r 1-- _ \ -- y. om, _. • z, 'ice_,�,• r='„'C>sW.9 -__ • `". i W y:, 0 S l r i -- _- �x j ` l ij,� lj V•ai - r' _': \i-_ i -. Um i t \ . Yvl ,�. � ' -` . Pe f C 1 '! 1.� ��'1 1 z, I \ \ ufn _ �f — i i rr--\'ram'-���.��:—i 1 7''1,•,`, I , 1 ey?l u •via mas'- \.+ ..yrs § `�N,..y� �`'i} _ __.—_.__.—_..____.— --_____._ 1 $ _! ,�'\ \ � . • I t-;:::,;'.-::---IM4''---'''."''- - - Itbi. r•-•4_,,..,-,,NT": , ...;r,or,.. ,.., ,_.,,,.......„.„...,„.„..,,,.....„_...... , ., _„...,... .___,,, . ,,, . _____„,...„ ....„,..,_,,,...„,...._, —Tx3'r �y,r-� .... .s�..c g �v-.' y 7 i sir.w'r ^r _ Pc. e y v �., ,r-a y - A y • " -� k — Niaie CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON, RATIFYING AMENDMENTS TO THE COUNTYWIDE PLANNING POLICIES WHEREAS, the Growth Management Act, RCW 36.70A. 210 mandates the development and adoption of Countywide Planning Policies for King County, and WHEREAS, the King County, the City of Seattle, the City of Bellevue and the Suburban Cities of King County have met jointly as the Growth Management Planning Council (GMPC) to develop and recommend Countywide Planning Policies; and WHEREAS, the City of Renton has ratified the Countywide Planning Policies and subsequent amendments, and WHEREAS, Countywide Planning Policy FW-1 Step 9 provides for an amendment process to change the Planning Policies as may be necessary from time to time, and WHEREAS, On February 14, 2005, the Metropolitan King County Council took action ratifying the proposed amendments to the King County Countywide Planning Policies including: 1) GMPC Motion 04-01 Amendments to the Potential Annexation Area Map affecting lands within Tukwila, Redmond,Enumclaw, Bellevue, Kirkland, and Bear Creek Urban Planned Development within the existing urban growth area and designating a new Urban Separator in Redmond. 2) GMPC Motion 04-02 Amendments to the Urban Growth Area map adding lands in Issaquah and Renton PAAs to the Urban Growth Area and amending the Urban Growth Boundary. 3) GMPC Motion 04-03 Amendment designating the Burien downtown as an Urban Center as defined in the CPPs. 4) GMPC Motion 04-04 Technical corrections to growth targets for the West Hill unincorporated area,Tukwila, Kent, Pacific and Auburn. 5) GMPC Motion 04-05 Map amendments changing the Urban Growth Areas Map and Urban Growth Area Boundary to add a 29-acre area to the Covington PAA. RESOLUTION NO. Noe WHEREAS, the amendment process requires ratification of proposed amendments by at least 30 percent of the City and County governments representing 70 percent of the population in King County, and NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON, DO RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS: SECTION I. The above findings are true and correct in all respects. SECTION II. The proposed amendments to the Countywide Planning Policies are consistent with the adopted City Comprehensive Plan and the adopted City Business Plan. SECTION III. The best interests and general welfare of the City of Renton would be served by ratification of Ordinance 15121, 15123, and 15122 (GMPC Motions 04-01, 04-02, 04-03, 04-04, 04-05) as approved by the King County Council and the Growth Management Planning Council. PASSED BY THE CITY COUNCIL this day of , 2004. Bonnie I. Walton, City Clerk APPROVED BY THE MAYOR this day of , 2004. Kathy Keolker- Wheeler, Mayor 2 `ORES OLUTION NO. 'N✓' Approved as to form: Lawrence J. Warren, City Attorney 3 err' 'w✓ RECEIVED King County MAR 7 2005 ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT, NEIGHBORHOODS, AND STRATEGIC PLANNING March 4, 2005 The Honorable Kathy Keolker-Wheeler City of Renton 1055 South Grady Way Renton, WA 98055 Dear Mayor Keolker-Wheeler: We are pleased to forward for your consideration and ratification the enclosed amendments to the King County Countywide Planning Policies (CPP). On February 14, 2005, the King County Council approved and ratified amendments (listed below) on behalf of unincorporated King County. Copies of the King County Council staff reports, ordinances and Growth Management Planning Council motions are enclosed to assist you in your review of these amendments. • Ordinance No. 15121, GMPC Motion Nos. 04-1, 04-2, 04-5, amending the Countywide Planning Policies by amending the urban growth boundary map, the interim potential annexation areas map and the urban separator map. • Ordinance No. 15122, GMPC Motion No. 04-4, amending the Countywide Planning Policies by revising targets for new household and job growth for the period 2002-2022. • Ordinance No. 15123, GMPC Motion No. 04-3, amending the Countywide Planning Policies by designating Downtown Burien as an Urban Center. In accordance with the Countywide Planning Policies, FW-1, Step 9, amendments become effective when ratified by ordinance or resolution by at least 30 percent of the city and county governments representing 70 percent of the population of King County according to the interlocal agreement. A city will be deemed to have ratified the amendments to the Countywide Planning Policies gic9 unless, within 90 days of adoption by King County, the city takes legislative action to disapprove the amendments. Please note that the 90-day deadline for this amendment is May 16, 2005. If you have any questions about the amendments or ratification process, please contact Paul Reitenbach, Senior Policy Analyst, King County Department of Development and Environmental Services, at 206-296-6705, or Lauren Smith, Lead Staff, King County Council, at 206-296-0352. If you adopt any legislation relative to this action, please send a copy of the legislation by the close of business, May 16, 2005, to Anne Noris, Clerk of the Council, W1039 King County Courthouse, 516 Third Avenue, Seattle, WA 98104. Thank you for your prompt attention to this matter. Sincerely, Larry Phillips, Chair Ron Sims King County Council King County Executive Enclosures cc Ong County City Planning Directors Suburban Cities Association Stephanie Warden, Director, Department of Development and Environmental Services (DDES) Paul Reitenbach, Senior Policy Analyst, DDES Megan Smith, Lead Staff, Growth Management & Unincorporated Areas Committee (GMUAC) Lauren Smith, Lead Staff, Committee of the Whole fire Letter from City of Burien requesting support will be sent next week We should receive it by e-mail by the 15th, and the Mayor's office should receive it by the 17t. KING COUNTY �✓1200 King County Courthouse 516 Third Avenue /// Seattle,WA 98104 Signature Report February 14, 2005 Ordinance 15121 Proposed No. 2005-0045.1 Sponsors Constantine 1 AN ORDINANCE adopting amendments to the 2 Countywide Planning Policies; amending the urban growth 3 boundary map, the interim potential annexation areas map 4 and the urban separator map; ratifying the amended 5 Countywide Planning Policies for unincorporated King 6 County; and amending Ordinance 10450, Section 3,as 7 amended, and K.C.C. 20.10.030 and Ordinance 10450, 8 Section 4, as amended, and K.C.C. 20.10.040. 9 10 11 BE IT ORDAINED BY THE COUNCIL,OF KING COUNTY: 12 SECTION 1. Findings. The council makes the following findings: 13 A. The metropolitan King County council adopted and ratified the Growth 14 Management Planning Council recommended King County 2012 -Countywide Planning 15 Policies (Phase I) in July 1992, under Ordinance 10450. 1 Ordinance 15121 16 B. The metropolitan King County council adopted and ratified the Phase II 17 amendments to the Countywide Planning Policies on August 15, 1994, under Ordinance 18 11446. 19 C. The Growth Management Planning Council met on September-15, 2004, and 20 December 7, 2004, and voted to recommend amendments to the King County 21 Countywide Planning Policies amending the urban growth boundary map, the interim 22 potential annexation areas map and the urban separator map, as shown in Attachments A, 23 B and C to this ordinance. 24 SECTION 2. Ordinance 10450, Section 3,as amended, and K.C.C. 20.10.030 are 25 each hereby amended to read as follows: 26 Phase II. 27 A. The Phase II Amendments to the King County 2012 Countywide Planning 28 Policies attached to Ordinance 11446 are hereby approved and adopted. 29 B. The Phase II Amendments to the King County 2012 - Countywide Planning 30 Policies are amended, as shown by Attachment 1 to Ordinance 12027. 31 C. The Phase II Amendments to the King County 2012 -Countywide Planning 32 Policies are amended, as shown by Attachment 1 to Ordinance 12421. 33 D. The Phase II Amendments to the King County 2012 - Countywide Planning 34 Policies are amended, as shown by Attachments 1 and 2 to Ordinance 13260. 35 E. The Phase II Amendments to the King County 2012 -Countywide Planning 36 Policies are amended, as shown by Attachments 1 through 4 to Ordinance 13415. 37 F. The Phase II Amendments to the King County 2012 - Countywide Planning 38 Policies are amended, as shown by Attachments 1 through 3 to Ordinance 13858. 2 Ordinance 15121 'r..✓ Noe 39 G. The Phase H Amendments to the King County 2012—Countywide Planning 40 Policies are amended, as shown by Attachment 1 to Ordinance 14390. 41 H. The Phase II Amendments to the King County 2012—Countywide Planning 42 Policies are amended,as shown by Attachment 1 to Ordinance 14391. - 43 I. The Phase II Amendments to the King County 2012—Countywide Planning 44 Policies are amended, as shown by Attachment 1 to Ordinance 14392. 45 J. The Phase II Amendments to the King County 2012-Countywide Planning 46 Policies are amended, as shown by Attachment 1 to Ordinance 14652. 47 K. The Phase II Amendments to the King County 2012-Countywide Planning 48 Policies are amended, as shown by Attachments 1 through 3 to Ordinance 14653. 49 L. The Phase II Amendments to the King County 2012- Countywide Planning 50 Policies are amended, as shown by Attachment I to Ordinance 14654. 51 M. The Phase II Amendments to the King County 2012- Countywide Planning 52 Policies are amended, as shown by Attachment 1 to Ordinance 14655. 53 N. The Phase II Amendments to the King County 2012-Countywide Planning 54 Policies are amended, as shown by Attachments 1 and 2 to Ordinance 14656. 55 O. The Phase II amendments to the King County 2012—Countywide Planning 56 Policies are amended, as shown by Attachment A to Ordinance 14844. 57 P. The Phase II Amendments to the King County 2012 -Countywide Planning 58 Policies are amended, as shown by Attachments A, B and C to this ordinance. 59 SECTION 3. Ordinance 10450, Section 4, as amended, and K.C.C. 20.10.040 are 60 each hereby amended to read as follows: 61 Ratification for unincorporated King County. 3 1 101119 NNW Ordinance 15121 62 A. Countywide Planning Policies adopted by Ordinance 10450 for the purposes 63 specified are hereby ratified on behalf of the population of unincorporated King County. 64 B. The amendments to the Countywide Planning Policies adopted by Ordinance 65 10840 are hereby ratified on behalf of the population of unincorporated King County. 66 C. The amendments to the Countywide Planning Policies adopted by Ordinance 67 11061 are hereby ratified on behalf of the population of unincorporated King County_ 68 D. The Phase II amendments to the King County 2012 Countywide Planning 69 Policies adopted by Ordinance 11446 are hereby ratified on behalf of the population of 70 unincorporated King County. 71 E. The amendments to the King County 2012-Countywide Planning Policies, as 72 shown by Attachment 1 to Ordinance 12027 are hereby ratified on behalf of the 73 population of unincorporated King County. 74 F. The amendments to the King County 2012-Countywide Planning Policies, as 75 shown by Attachment 1 to Ordinance 12421, are hereby ratified on behalf of the 76 population of unincorporated King County. 77 G. The amendments to the King County 2012 -Countywide Planning Policies, as 78 shown by Attachments 1 and 2 to Ordinance 13260, are hereby ratified on behalf of the 79 population of unincorporated King County. 80 H. The amendments to the King County 2012-Countywide Planning Policies,as 81 shown by Attachment 1 through 4 to Ordinance 13415, are hereby ratified on behalf of 82 the population of unincorporated King County. 4 Ordinance 15121 41.r Nort 83 I. The amendments to the King County 2012 -Countywide Planning Policies, as 84 shown by Attachments 1 through 3 to Ordinance 13858, are hereby ratified on behalf of 85 the population of unincorporated King County. 86 J. The amendments to the King County 2012 -Countywide Planning Policies, as 87 shown by Attachment 1 to Ordinance 14390, are hereby ratified on behalf of the 88 population of unincorporated King County. 89 K. The amendments to the King County 2012-Countywide Planning Policies, as 90 shown by Attachment 1 to Ordinance 14391,are hereby ratified on behalf of the 91 population of unincorporated King County. 92 L. The amendments to the King County 2012 -Countywide Planning Policies, as 93 shown by Attachment 1 to Ordinance 14392, are hereby ratified on behalf of the 94 population of unincorporated King County. 95 M. The amendments to the King County 2012 -Countywide Planning Policies, as 96 shown by Attachment 1 to Ordinance 14652, are hereby ratified on behalf of the 97 population of unincorporated King County. 98 N. The amendments to the King County 2012 -Countywide Planning Policies, as 99 shown by Attachments 1 through 3 to Ordinance 14653, are hereby ratified on behalf of 100 the population of unincorporated King County. 101 O. The amendments to the King County 2012 - Countywide Planning Policies, as 102 shown by Attachment 1 to Ordinance 14654, are hereby ratified on behalf of the 103 population of unincorporated King County. 5 • Ordinance 15121 104 P. The amendments to the King County 2012 - Countywide Planning Policies, as 105 shown by Attachment 1 to Ordinance 14655,are hereby ratified on behalf of the 106 population of unincorporated King County. 107 Q. The amendments to the King County 2012-Countywide Planning Policies, as 108 shown by Attachments 1 and 2 to Ordinance 14656, are hereby ratified on behalf of the 109 population of unincorporated King County. 110 R. The amendments to the King County 2012—Countywide Planning Policies, as 111 shown by Attachment A to Ordinance 14844, are hereby ratified on behalf of the 112 population of unincorporated King County. 113 S. The amendments to the King.County 2012 -Countywide Planning Policies, as 6 Ordinance 15121 '"re 114 shown by Attachments A, B and C to this ordinance, are hereby ratified on behalf of the 115 population of unincorporated King County. 116 Ordinance 15121 was introduced on 1/31/2005 and passed by the Metropolitan King County Council on 2/14/2005, by the following vote: Yes: 12 - Mr. Phillips, Mr. von Reichbauer, Ms. Lambert, Mr. Pelz,Mr. Dunn, Mr. Ferguson, Mr. Hammond, Mr. Gossett, Ms. Hague, Mr. Irons, Ms. Patterson and Mr. Constantine No: 0 Excused: 1 -Ms. Edmonds KING CO0g Y CO L ICING Y,W RING ON `V ,Larry Phillips,Chair pakii I =fJou a'.- ATTEST: C.y. .),, ..)„..:4, . Anne Noris,Clerk of the Council APPROVED this Aday of 2005. 0 Ron Sims,C unty Executive -7-1 ra Attachments A. Motion No.04-1,B.Motion No.04-2,C. Motion No.04-51_0 I c C")• Cat 7 _ _ _ _ �rrr' 2OO5O45 15121 09/15/04 Attachment A Sponsored By: Executive Committee /pr - 1 MOTION NO. 04-1 2 A MOTION to amend the Urban Growth Area of King 3 County. This Motion also modifies the Potential Annexation 4 Area map in the Countywide Planning Policies and 5 designates a new Urban Separator. 6 7 8 WHEREAS, the Washington State Growth Management Act,RCW 36.70A_110 requires 9 counties to designate an urban growth area or areas within which urban growth shall be 10 encouraged and outside of which growth can occur only if it is not urban in nature; and 11 12 WHEREAS,Countywide Planning Policy FW-1 Step 8 recognizes that King County may 13 initiate amendments to the Urban Growth Area; and 14 15 WHEREAS, the King County Executive and the Metropolitan King County Council 16 requests the Growth Management Planning Council consider the attached amendments to 17 the Urban Growth Area for eventual adoption by the Metropolitan King County Council 18 and ratification by the cities; and 19 20 WHEREAS,the Growth Management Planning Council has directed the interjurisdictionaI 21 staff team to review additional Urban Separators and present them for GMPC 22 consideration, and 23 . 24 WHEREAS,Countywide Planning Policies LU-31 and LU-32 anticipate the collaborative 25 designation of Potential Annexation Areas and the eventual annexation of these areas by 26 cities. The attached amendments are supported by the affected city. 27 28 BE IT RESOLVED THAT THE GROWTH MANAGEMENT PLANNING COUNCIL OF 29 KING COUNTY HEREBY MOVES AS FOLLOWS: 30 31 1. Amend the Urban Growth Area as designated by the Urban Growth Areas Map in the 32 Countywide Planning Policies, the Potential Annexation Area map,and the Urban 33 Separator map as depicted on the following attached maps: 34 35 36 - 1 - 15 12 ` 1 Attachment 1, a map showing the removal of the red"overlap"designation for the 2 unincorporated Urban area between SeaTac and Tukwila and including this area in 3 Tukwila's PAA; 4 5 Attachment 2, a map showing the redesignation of Perrigo Park from Rural to 6 Urban and including this property within Redmond's PAA; - 7 8 Attachment 3, a map showing the redesignation of the Enumclaw Golf Course from 9 Rural to Urban and including this property within Enumclaw's PAA; 10 . 11 Attachment 4, a map showing the redesignation of a.6 of an acre parcel on Cougar 12 Mountain from Rural to Urban and including this property within Bellevue's PAA; 13 14 Attachment 5, a map showing the redesignation of 120 acres of the Bear Creek 15 Urban Planned Development from Urban to Rural; 16 17 Attachment 6, a map showing the redesignation of approximately 128 acres in the 18 Willows Road area from Rural to Urban and including this area within Kirkland's 19 PAA. Approximately 70 acres of this area is designated as an Urban Separator. 20 21 2. Amend the Interim Potential Annexation Area Map by including any additional 22 unincorporated urban land created by these UGA amendments in the Potential 23 Annexation Area of the adjoining city. 24 25 3. Amend the Urban Separator map by adding the new Urban Separator as shown on 26 attachment 6. 27 28 4. These amendments are recommended to the Metropolitan King County Council and the 29 Cities of King County for adoption and ratification. 30 31 32 33 ADOPTED by the Growth Management Planning Council of King County in open session 34 on September 15,2004 and si chair of the GMPC. 35 36 37 38 on 'ms, hair,Gro h Management Planning Council 39 40 . - 2 - 15 Attachment 1 • Proposed Amendment Interim PAA Map Amendment n..ay.... swam or ass en.nu boon eo,aaa by Ka,Ca u sun.arn a ran.,.a0.,0.and is a.q.,-o w.qr K••. Ca.,, rnabes no ragarosenr.e. ea ...Ms_op..or.0..as to accuracy....rtebess w..�....or.laws eo»ra........loon.. If.,Coon, Proposed Area area be was tor any oar,..-spec.t ee.i.�....,a .o...a�,.a d.....a :...L.,. m a.:..a . .a. aes•or a al ate __ ..,ea..ma«, » ia.n e.. u.on*.mp a wo vf re a.4. e. ps. ..,mission a ! __' ain.Co �• L_ _, Incorporated Areas 1.000 500 0 1.000 2,000 I ilFeet awcwa.r.ewa.n...uaa:wae..-...r_ss.•+.-._....4 r+..._.nn.a. • I. _1 1�� �Fin:g - �L + L41j4Jt4Lt11j 1 1 LJ'{...,I t-'__ �i t` ' 1 ;—I 1 I I'� 1 'F `LIEt / ' 4 j ` �t5f tr�r_� I 1(—j_-- / J P. gig 1 r �.3 -,—Ty� ice:...., ram— 1' I' i �,b1.1,� �i �-3 � �— G ;E tI t t ip—41=1 / i ► � �; �, '., / v=5 ___. ��J Si Jrl G .,�V G�I ((l Il }��(: S j�7`` 9 i' �'�- d,\ i �� F"-'�Ea-r tT R1C �.! /^_--,/ TuXmla i ,` �! -1, r r !• '; r /(� r44-- Qri J ' :.J---._—i ":-r.7 / �� ,-' �, , '. t ` -`' -- i ca ' 1 t ` SeaTac , l \i l z "—'r •—1 {' ^V� ! t i, •err i>\��. %,I }r, ,,: -- ;.-- } 7— • I _ . r=-,F :tom\� `v';•i"'ter ` —j_�'- 'L- i fir —i7 . r+ . y ! ' - ,- :— �-4 :I!'qt ¢`+ate' I ii:3;e- �#__z1—1i/" / '1 - ', ! r i, i T t r y. 11} �_ ' / �` I jL�L_a_...__; 1. ! .I h fy F-s Sir �Y.`-_a / ./ 7% 1 r X I t A.---. i�a s�'`� " w .ev ;y ' /NN j ! �'�- j -�/j Ij 1 — i 1 1 11 .7 1._A .�\s-0, = d 'lrt It t r y i r Ii/'' ;1 ;Kent , !i ! !3 1 n!'`' I /i I :._ /` I 1111.. b 1 I °' '.\�,��/" I l I 1 •`-'!y ' '� _!77-2_-,__;•!-—.„1,, tl`h;t-i rf-f-• j '1,r `.—_r 3 .=z-: —w.,s!_,— �\\`��'±' 1 ' _JLJ , ; f Tit I ' --z:" -- t i t .�� is .J -- / i t 'i fit: --_1-1 •7 • r'r� t /'�_' 1 - `— 1! `- ` ° � [ r'� Add Outlined Area 11 i i' ass=` -' rl. ., - `� —i i i l � r 1 _� Sri eY I �� is ,._; ---.,-----k.e.--• .--<-;,..,4- —1,----- T. i ; : -_,,__ ,, a.a— __— — ;l rL1 ri�� `/ -4 r—j 1-- i l—_i r - -,E . •-n. l Ili a +1.ar .%1 4 <`,,3 %. pt, ---1 I , . ______ %iv ji. 5 21. . Attachment 2 N Proposed Amendment City of Redmond Perrigo Community Park Site -UGA Amendment Ilse.+.. ....d.e.a... map.a,4.e0 al,by ,4y County sva 4oa.ran,ofsowces m.0.500.0010 cage ...,w..a - C0.0,as .o AS,1141,041k3M3 0, e...ss a k.d•..a:b..d+cr..•••v..s..a. M::,�:a yr b h u J ...Imo* Kong 0...1, *.V Urban Growth Boundary - p p Other Parks I Wilderness seta.a 4e 4a4b a any y�wr.sp..w.a.....a.iae..J�a crossa....s ...a9.. :.e.,a g. n. a.:w b. Ws.pow rair 9, 4o,n..e uz e.amaOMr :w.:..apmaae.ea a,w:e.y_ b,sale d...,sap o. ♦♦ ♦ Proposed Urban a.* oa• :e..eoe. o.III...............o. ♦ . s4wq Ca Growth Boundary rr Rural Residential 400 200 0 400 800 1 �Feet [ J Incorporated Areas • ='te ri, '.. _ j� a mak. a1 I I I i i 1 F-' te., ..\/it 1 I ! b 'k ii EPt---_ -",_:_fr. , 1 ____, , 44, I i I ♦ rra -i��. ,1 rr I j 1 • Ail. 0 .1 r 1 r ii \ ,,---1 . ij I <-%?.,:.:_:;.%•,--:,:- y_ --Ara 7}�� , i___i \ I I i; Ili(N I ! z--- i rr f/ Glee1 1 li II • I pot i ll RE MOND i II 1 #' t 1 I rr I I I Eva is Cre.k �; I� I-I I lr fY--3 • .4: w , ,... \_, \-/ I 1 4 C___! 11 1 - I � I i L1 [fs� —� i i j i ( ' \ - I 1 o 1ijI ; \\ I 5 _0 ,4,„ii2 1 Attachment 3 iv • Proposed Amendment + . Enumclaw Golf Course - UGA Amendment iho inmmatioa inducled on Om nap has Dom scamkal 1, aft,. • Kfm Comfy sled hon.a misty of'moors and.1 solY.110 dfansp 1 ,A,_ Urban Growth Boundary......., mace Mfg Comfy maim a* repessontsams of rx Rural City UGA ammeas.famms.Moff.&as fa aocamy.comafferms_ andmoss.of fights lo la me al such...alio. Kim Comfy Mal nof bo liable kw any gam..SoMal Mi.(Wider..ot e 4 # Proposed Urban cons...Sal [Imams inducing. bol a. Safkoa M. Ma mom.of kaa profits mullirig lam Itto vs*of Masao of Ma # • Growth Boundary rr Rural Residential infoomlion coMans0 on Ns enap My MG Of Mis arm a infona.iman Ibis rasp is polfafibfa me.toy*en monism:on of I MO Omar - Proposed Forest Production i soo 250 0 . 500 1,000 V District Boundary f Forest i iiii Feet I y r-----, • •••.-r.;-i..;....;_3/or..N.;.........d.•....,,,.,..4.*...,,,,,.,,,„. L ; incorporated Areas am samoMMISMemoaMMOIMas_asso ty......,2110.0.•_••saftela,,,411_1"._141.,40 ! ! 1------------------\; . . ! I : L-111 V\ I , I . I!I i 14 i I 1 J• 1---;i--- •I • s . . i . . i . . • . . , ,,, , ,,...-- - '.... 4; i •. . r , ENUMCLAW t . . •-_ .—_ . . • • ' i . . ; 1. f i • ! i 0 ; I------i 7 : j • , .", . , • I : • .?". • ; •---- , , I i i 1 --4, I _ !iF ,1 ! , ,I ! 1 —1:---- 1----"1 I 1------i J i I t ''.... rr f . I : • i 1, ; i •• i ;: !• i i .i A j !i i i 1,-....-..-.; i :1 i.,• : t a t i; : !------H i t . • • . : —-- .--:._—‘..-..1_-.•1.--2--,'----_i'._.--i-----' i i i I ...—- ..-............-.... A ' ,-----—I ,.• : ! .-11--: f-------i i-----u-s----;i:_..,, -,,-, -„'•.;. -4.,,,_„,,,...e.„„.,,,.,,,,__.,,,.,._...,4,._,._,,,,,__.,-,-7,,,,,,,-----.:- ____ ,,,,_ . . :! : .::. %. _ _. .,_ __ _ •N , . • , ! t'.-- • N. . . i:.-- ---• --7—iirl -- ,1 -. . ) 1 . I f : . I a; rx \\'N rr 1. 7-st....,.......1____ - i ------- qr. - "..---6-4 i.:K. . L 1 ,...,.! . . i r---------; i I rx f I "V . . ., le . , .. . ... , >.K I . . , . i . • • ; . ag : • • ; . . 'i I• 0I, - i. •.-.. ! ! • : I rr \ • :t --...._AM I \ • '...----.- rr— -----,-_—_,_ ,. . : • i ,. ..:---- ,,,, , ...._ • ---.N .., • , ,.-: e :-,:t...,.-, ., -/\ : • .., .. • ______, _ 1 _ • : kW 1 5 1 1 Attachment 4 iProposed Amendment I Cougar Mountain - UGA Amendment The..am,,0o....a=...Os Sys'map was...n no-pad by K..y C....T sap w..a nasty a saunas area...two to Stop ..s..ts e.t.a. rag co...r mates o.so+a..aca.s a a.y.ae-.s a am..ary.co.o.. *. a...s...a a aya.a,.use a such.....aa w.p cawr Saas...t w an..to..s Y0••'i.w.or...a..a-.s;e.....a .sasea.Sial m..ain a.Mtl.O. ... anal Ga.. b hal k- . „21. ..a....sin...a a.b,..a Cra Urban Growth Boundary r r Rural Residential aka...caw.w a...o.... A,r rill¢•...a a.a..ura..T.:w=..a....s..00.ws•••a.•....csa.e •wCamay •8 • Proposed Urban U! Urban Residential,low,1 du/ac 300 150 0 300 soo • • Growth Boundary r Study Area ...c,.......wsa.....as.s.w._.w.....sra.n_e..._a.....,_.m.....r i 1 pi i To ri x i 1,,A417Ap, . IL I d c_____, 411161 lbr ri I I 111 al a Illimik LI 1 ,----- i/ ait B LL V 1 I lib Wialiilelie No 1100, Alp. ; I 1 Una #P __ ___IL.--;.2,---, : 111 .k. Willannalliln. c,, • 1. I 141.11141/, alb N4 Ai limmiormumils. •- allnaL11161. ---I, !Wilk ♦ IIIi [ amm NOWELL gbillikageftilli l' ....„,..5r,--._,--y,r7r- X 1 I 114 Pi 171 I I I 14Anil I I:M" us i L14p VIIIV 1 fy,rc_ p ,\ ! N rr I r 1 11 ii - '44.110e Attachment 5 ri Proposed Amendment + 1 Redmond Ridge - UGA Amendment The nnennahon anclucha0 on Ohs nap has been canopied by _ Kap Cows,start Moto a iaiory ol hoer and ra sot*.is change ie.. sok. rarest Copan"snakes re isprosseviatiais or wan arsiac Sates..ea*pied.as IS amaracy.compisteness. ionstearss.s•tigids 10 the us*at aucti Into-mail,..Kiria Cp..y shalt no.to iiatits ke toy vonetal,sosirial.i.e..inodsnial.or csnowliassiot rlassaipe iefecing. Isai sot frisisid to. lost reeemoss Of bil patties isaadliava Wan eis see so*suss al eis Urban Growth Boundary r r Rural Residential inismsatior.sionlioset on tl.;map Any sale ot eis nap of - ntornialios so Itis map is seshitillsif swept Imr*isles ponviisaion ol Mang County ** # Proposed Urban upd Urban Planned Development • • 750 375 0 750 1.500 Growth Boundary In !iiiiiT! !9 Feet IIIII Change Area a magegi.j.-0200,0:CCPpysaal.todsliM1,5,..........4•4,.....)......• ANC Leis710.3........1.41.20114_40,•19...,,2•0.1126,NAnsul....e_1.14,14.11....111 -.: .....,.. ,..,,,,___..:, ,__....... • , ,.....• ....„. :v.:. • ..• , , ..4,,,l - \ ..• ., \\ ',...7.- `-'-.-----____4_ -4..,!---- ,f, ; -_ • ; ------,---.,'•' '. -- . . i ,-,•• .-.... .Vr - ---i 7 : • .--4-' • . I •'''ai- ' . . \... __!--------i------ -_,./. 4 i , ,,' e!,..- _-. !-,s••`.:_•• . .• II . • I \ ..... • \ --- ‘"?Z•-'!-ti. ., • • _ ...______J__ 11 • - \--.,-- -ec . _ • , — r , • , 1 , . , , e ...,— Y,..-_•zif), . • •-•-.....,. \ PO ___ -, 7 :VIr r :•-- •- ' -1 ' • ' \\ . . . \ : -.:•-_,I: • ! , 1 2 I .• „ , , , , \: .1,,_,,i, • r;fyi , ....., . atc„....., ,..._ \ ... , . .... . ....-' I \ ,ziz ...,..„ _______ =L._L__i ;-• ---- ----- ....-- __________ • ,,- ...) _.•--- - ; ---•• •.,.-4,.:,_%-i,g1::-. _1-••:._.,_:\----,. ..-- \\, • -n;i,e--_--,:_,..„ :„.. _..- .,1 i I- r-- -T-- ___._- \ , . .•..-, s\\ 7-7.1 7...-.f.-_-•,f-.,,i .'4-et—I ,-----11----___L_..._I F------' \ : • __. -----\- ' • ,.. . •. . • ..- •: • • : • _,.....„..... ...„..........._,_...._____ ;------ • I upd • a . . . .... •__. l''''' •lit . 'N. • ' h• ! i . ! .---___ ---- ., ------- -----1 .. ..._ . .! J .-, • • • . . . I ! • .. . ! ------_:;_i --:-----_-- i.--_ i • ,. _ E -- -- ; .., , 1- • '• -, • : . ;!___ , i . , . . , _.• ! i .;-- :_ : . —--, , —1, ---- — • • i , rf 1 ..,___ i, ,• 0 - ...._._.., •,-- . __i • , . • , • ••, ; i !____,__ ; , _ . . • , , • . . , , k--------. . '......,, 4.• : . I I 1 . i I i , ____ __..',.__ _.__j' \ . ›-..• , . ...--, . " t • -------! i .. . , . :' ' , ---ff • i--=;---- ----; 1 • ----1---- : . ; . t ________ :.- . I ..;.„-' : e -, , , .: --..----.—__..,„----•____ , 1 i i 1 : , i • , ., I , --------1:___----7- 1 . 1. P L_1 • ' - 1 --, -• '. t ,,,, ,, • . ' I . ! . ' ! . • 1 . . - I i • I i! it- ! t i • ,,----,---"----------_. ' 6 --\ -4----!--- -----ir-_ _i i I - -,1 --,‘..,.---...\ -- I • - - ! --, • , ! ,, -, - - i I , i I - •-- - -- ---i V.:'\V-I---- I , , I ...__. . •, ___-: i : !I i -."".' -7, ---- I ------.________. ' ;---!:,--NP-;',----.' i i----!----__l_____4___ • , 1 .,--r. . ._ . ' • i'--..i ,',-,_, --,________ ! . . ; i' f, ..._ !, : • < f ! i i . • . . ___.--I! :. -'-'-',-1 . ... , ! • I 1 ------..,, ,,.,,: ',"------- ...;''F'S. i'-----. . . ..,_ L__ , / • --- -- --!-- •!!- -,:- .,••::-,(-----z-__,::---: '74, • . ' I ‘' I ---I • " • ._.' • : - ' " ' : ----i.-____ , ' - i ! . I ------4____, : , i :-'-',.(:,...------: ———. --___ ‘1111, *tit. 5 12 1. , Attachment 6 "4 Proposed Amendment Willows Road Subarea Plan - UGA Amendment rn.......ffo.Mad..en fins ma/..>•me..imnpn.ffy ••'^/C...l,s.al ffen a.si.a at solo.a. is sagas t...a. K"Y Ca..,...Ms m•s/•....ons. . ...a.e...es•..s. ..MO .an in ma m wi.s so , r.ds. -..: ...ails=_co .�.d.:� .....a so.;ua.,.a... C..., Urban Growth Boundary g b Greenbelt/Urban Separator M.a/tl b baffle tr ay q....r/..g..cl.in......6e.aa1,. ......l,* mannan i.0a4y. but .al ff..W Am last off.0/labs fem.,M M.Me maor.loss.a/.. Mumma.•o•1 ..Pi• ad .�. ,♦f * Proposed Urban Wcwwa urn Urban residential,medium,4-12 dulac u..e..f.map /ra:ffiN.cg.My probs.d Caner • •i,Caner Growth Boundary f r Rural residential 400. 200 0 400 &)0 ___ Feel ` .. Incorporated Areas L __, Po Change Area ...C.ws1..GlL..v.aaYVUtM._.a._./e......%W4.�....._.e..-..ftM.N -T . '— WOODINVILLE IC it-: . • . . , , " Z. i lj . r: r , r • e . y) eI ! s L� "•—•M...�.� i L / g b 1,7 7. i —_i t 1, i _ - --- — . .0 NE 132nd Sr ,- ---------- u • f` gr i r. 77�-.I./ `i 7 5; y. I Y > 1 F 1i f. Z i r. -- _— -- i - — 1. e 3— _ a / 0 3 k KIRKLAND / k t } - % 1 Jam' --L-'.. �" •'�• - - . .'-':., 121 2OO5O45 09/15/04 - Attachment B Sponsored By: Executive Committee /pr 1 MOTION NO. 04-2 2 A MOTION to amend the Urban Growth Area of King 3 County. This Motion also modifies the Potential Annexation 4 Area map in the Countywide Planning Policies. 5 6 7 WHEREAS,the Washington State Growth Management Act, RCW 36.70A.110 requires 8 counties to designate an urban growth area or areas within which urban growth shall be 9 encouraged and outside of which growth can occur only if it is not urban in nature; and 10 11 WHEREAS,Countywide Planning Policy FW-1 Step 8 recognizes that King County may 12 initiate amendments to the Urban Growth Area; and 13 14 WHEREAS, the King County Executive and the Metropolitan King County Council 15 requests the Growth Management Planning Council consider the attached amendments to 16 the Urban Growth Area for eventual adoption by the Metropolitan King County Council 17 and ratification by the cities; and 18 19 WHEREAS,Countywide Planning Policies LU-31 and LU-32 anticipate the collaborative 20 designation of Potential Annexation Areas and the eventual annexation of these areas by 21 cities. The attached amendments are supported by the affected city. 22 23 BE IT RESOLVED THAT THE GROWTH MANAGEMENT PLANNING COUNCIL OF 24 KING COUNTY HEREBY MOVES AS FOLLOWS: 25 26 1. Amend the Urban Growth Area as designated by the Urban Growth Areas Map in the 27 Countywide Planning Policies and the Potential Annexation Area map as depicted on 28 the following attached maps: 29 30 Attachment 1, a map showing the redesignation of an area adjoining the Issaquah 31 Spar Road from Rural to Urban and including this property within lssaquah's's 32 PAA. There is also a very small (approximately.2 acre) redesignation from Urban 33 to Rural to correct a likely mapping error. 34 35 Attachment 2, a map showing the redesignation of approximately 6 acres from 36 Rural to Urban and including this property within the City of Renton's PAA; - 1 - %,„„, 15121 12 1 2 3 2. Amend the Interim Potential Annexation Area Map by including any additional 4 unincorporated urban Iand created by these UGA amendments in the Potential 5 Annexation Area of the adjoining city_ 6 7 3. These amendments are recommended to the Metropolitan King County Council and the 8 Cities of King County for adoption and ratification. 9 10 11 12 13 ADOPTED by the Growth Management Planning Council of King County in open session 14 on September 15,2004 and signed by the chair of the GMPC 15 16 17 18 Ron , hair, Growth Management Planning Council 19 20 - 2 - • _ &1 #Ienti N Proposed Amendment Issaquah Spar Road UGA Amendment ,,....so.a.o.waxen m be noo bay boon mooed by bop C.^Y sW bo a bobby of saes bolts seed b donee soon.,;ca p "County"'`^, :y' Urban Growth Boundary ••° Proposed,cm e<evoke.as Co • Pro sed Urban b...s..r retie a etbe ofsue ner acre Wee we, • nab re.r nb e.b woo w.rat oboe net L wsee 0, I o. North Fork Issaquah Creek lor oroos000nbrGrowth Boundary ce reer.too or""°""""'""°"""Ono tor co^"'w"°' (approximate location) A°°c N-Spar(approximate location) .eo..aeo,renewer a k nu. NI sob a.era Me or ....oboerea:s n op b.a.ebe e.ug h...atwn.......a r___1 `'c."" L . Incorporated Areas o 75 150 300 450 600 IT Rural Residential am in ��� = minemi Feet Q Change Area UI Urban Low,1 du/ac .,K b e•_m k "-..-noon._.._n_euo, _reco„odecio.}eubeS,...b_orte•ye / \ 1, 14 \ ''::-. \ is t h 1 SE 56thStki ,, } ir A yt ________-7------71.17 • —7----- -Q" all 1"y -8/ . •s • ,gq _,...,, 1 5 121 Attachment 2 N + Proposed Land Use Amendment . , Renton Christian Center - UGA Amendment ...111100•M11.01.1 wefues•co les Aao As AA scoelood by Kno Coo-sy AA A.•prosy al Autos ar.ts Abs.A AA.. . ..... wo•co As;Corwoly•......A Asorso.orons ow I ...Atom....2•5.0 0....eet,itt lo swevs•cy.......... .:-.. A.A.ow..shts to alt•owe ow Ad.Atornaoso. WA Cowen. -"';'C'.'I' b Uran Growth Boundary - ---,- r r Rural Residential sna•now A Able lo.am......A.sp.._inAost ocklowsal.A cooseo...* wo.o.tows loslowAs but oat AAA O. toe - mArowes A tmt AAA AAP.lobthe we A Asus•of Vas AA*.AMA.A no sop My sAe of 11.moo or 0 ' Proposed Urban Aton......or.As awa.is A.A..AAA twy'AAA PA...AA A • 4'. Growth Boundary urn Urban Residential,medium,4-12 du/ac ors.CA.. 400 200 0 400 aoo King County Owned — Stud y Area Feet 111111 - OS Open Space/Recreation --•,............,...,...—................._........_............_...,_........... -s.. •,, ,,,\‘7),7\,•y_.;,7-•-i:.,,i-r--------- -...--FR-,L:-*„. ..____- .._ , ._,, • 1._ i ', ‘;,-"...;•N`\- -...-- -__I r.--'::. 1! ,i ..-..„,,,. ,-,-_,- ....,:‘ .4,,,,E,.-.._,I,,,---...,;.. :j: • , -[- \'N'\\'i'''n r"--1,-,'•-—N.>- N1--t-t-i•" .."' . - '7-c--"--,--,:"., 14-N31*-1:•;-:"---,,,Z,,,'--",// - "7-.\,7 / ,/;,-;.1:17-i(-.1•-••_-'-:-". t ; ; f \ ,.., j,,-.......,_-- _ • ..4,1-e=.V.:-.-7,i--- --..,x,-,--". , //---------—_-_-. -,"----4:ci-A-4,.:•.----„5-,-,•,--. - .: ! , : • , : • • - • : 1; --,...• -,,--- .-----.-% .,..• i L--•,:. 1 •, ---::r& ,:?--t-:.-1 • . ..k•--- --- ‘ . , ; ' : 1 . . 1 ':I•-:-`-..---,-; --.--:-:,-!,-,- ... t•-...,6 •.,...-.P,... . ----,-.•fts...,,- ., :......,,...,..r.4.,..-..1:,....-:-s. 1.:-....._ ---- ,.A.:i.. 1-.,--.,..,.-,!,,,,,,!..; , - •:.„.,J...-..-,--_ _u_k_2_..- .,1. ! , :!___-7-,.....- ---5-,c•--,,, ,,,,,T., • -,--TI ...... ...1. --- itt:r... _.,.. ...,,t,-,-,,;:":„..1...i. -'':----"--?-j• - . : :' .J_3..- J."' \ r --''''''.'f'-..---.,'-'4-..'" ;.-=1::::,.•;,'; _ --'''\‘---•-`-'-i--'-"'i'-'• ;- —---i-';,---' )-1,-..---+-j,c- ''/ \ C_____.- _•-,- ------- ./V7';,.-.7e-- '' ---:'-- . . . ..•i 1 :-- -'0..-'-'-"4,;_- ytt=iii,14 -1 = :1 ‘.',;,-,7,;,-5',7‘;!:,,,,1::;r;?•:'..",.f,-,, i ,- -,- _ 1.4".e•Vr•.,,,,!Z": - ., . ; -4,...." ::,,,:-.--.4A71.•`::•,..r..;•,;;:, • - - -•-• . • ... • - , - --6- ! -- --'-'714-..1.04-'•'=.-"t•-17.-_--: - --,,; 414-,, • -4--'7''''''' -- -I.--,---,,-:- --..,... r", : : - - __ - .."‘ ..."..:7,2,',,,,...•..". .. _! , -----,,'i;.''.--,---7:s''.1-•:\\--' ; -\-- ------ -_--'-%-4:1-i-t.1-- - -,-- i . .....-_, . . . . . , . ... : --•-•-•-'--;-----v---!!„-___c_..2t----t---i : .., _,.._- , - ,.•-....,/-y-- -ss.. .--,.,1-.„- ---4,----- •;_------___;_-4---,-„-; I ,/A.,-- _--- - •-.. K.,.:,,,---.-,..- -t4-..3-t-ty.s,_•••• .. _._ --4:-..--4---1=-1 -- --.1,-..---+ :--c--;I , c,.- / •••••-• ------ .--..- --:F----'• ---7.-;•-•."--•---‘i---Y-- "....""----- --' . '''-,-4*-3:; .".4t.343:1‘t;-;.?"--' ... --, i OS/ . ''''''' s• ___,---i-:'\5‘,/;-- ----1-' "' ‘• :A:7_ --=--:'-171-1( //,;..-t;':i,..'--4.- .-- --...---,„ ,_•,! i--==‘,..:=_, ,\ ; ,; , , \i ,., ..„,/„- ,-".'r 11.t-" -.;•t' ,, N.•• •-- • . __:,.• .IN,., ....,:---, ---,...."---_i__\!- _-,-----_,,__: .-, urn : .. i , • ,. v.-„, ..,_1,-.,.../. ,-.1 ...,-„,..., 7.----...- ..ci• - -,-----r--„-- \.. ..; / cis ! .‘ ....% — . . ....-...-\‘ ,-2......-1,_ ,--.. .._—__._...-----_. , -, -• • rr \ •-- •- ----ii•k- ')-k-i K/` '/'-,',.-, -zi ---- L.';',:, -..._ti. _!_:_uri. '•'--1 7 ' - - - -—- - . • : • ; ••••:,\ • X i---‘,-;\, ,---,--<--„•.--: ::-. . .\ , ._- .....-. urn ,---• , - ---\-•,. ..--\-',- --.c; - • ' 1'.‹..,! -. --•••• -;--,,,,....• -:--,-, •••••'-,, ._.:"-'7 . -...- . . / i ' ' v...\r--1.----i __:7,! • i !'''-, ,,-,X i U M .1--,:filt ;\,,...,,,,-,,!..., I . r--11.p_ --_-7- i ! \ . ..-. ..• --,:•\ . '.-;',..,‘ /./,,, ,„,_)-_,-_, ,-•-_,,,,,,,,,:_,!_il. . . .„ •,-, , y__,•_ ! i-•( :-.) -k - /. ,,,,...••_., „_•,..---: : :.....•,_. •:.• aim-• --___. i !, ,,,,7,_,•,,,,..-, , 7......)„ .--„,- ; • , ', -•.,• ., , , •., , • - , : , • , , . 1 • ; • • , ,, , _. , . • . . . • •„•. • ..,. . . • . .• . . : :-„..,••. ____, - . : -2--fg-- . . ..,,,:„ '' \ :',=-*?-f.%.,:cFS*.- .'"•'-:.",' "-A-'--;' ,E.:,,,":, 7,."-: . . 4 1.71,,,.,.....743 •,V,-.....r;9-.•fz:)•=.s•••1--•-------A--,- ; ; : ',... • ... _-4 • . j...,,,...-„,...4....1,--4 -,..----,n.........--••••--=•-.--,_•.„.-_,..4-4 . ".•,:,--•••::•••-511.•-g -4-='; - i:---------.37 k-wi---4*04. . . i.1.4,s_-.-i.---74-,:-; 3. -. -.,,.73•••;.-t".. .F.f. .. : 7t. : ',..-....r.,-.- .A ,,,---.:-.-.-:%---v---A,±3.-- - nr -4,,--,h,,,','-- A,-,.*" a- x".•. . . . ..t . . -,..":'...'.7*-tkv..fr..1.'-kt-W.-7...4;,,.-• '' -:,...,.. - :•*---4.'_:i•- --- .W-Zz.-'' --.21..-- ,. , A' \ ' ,..., ..-;...-4-..0... . _,..... „, ..,.4„ .. ' T- N ,, ,.."-: -z-T•ift,_,-f.C.'”---.4‹. 0 . . ----''Vit..- .-.--'-' -4. :' •""ft "4-V,-- i 7-":.'' --- '.--.44."5- --14X-%.K4',P....t...:1"....,41f.....--1 •.1.-:::'-•:.".....";,-P7„..-.:.. ,...."4"- -_,.-,e.- -I,•-t-'4-:-:• --,...,- . -!;',-.f,..!"--,:i51-;•11';,3.....P'.,".,..?y,,,,- _."-,:'- . --., ..-,;, •-4,.1',,,,,tt,,' '' . ,-: __,-,Yr,-TE-,%..44C-Tel-Pre-C,40,...,..7."74t-T, _ 3..,...„...„.._!...4..;..,,v-...Ay.....'1,-,•-•±,,,, .., e ...44...t ...z.--., ----v...- ",,,..,..-zz.,,.▪,.41--..,.... --k ;:g..,..1.-., ,:..f. ,4,-.:-775....----.5-7.:-.1. .:-.--.-..,,,--n. .-z-2'7:-...--t.,.T"•-eR.L'..! ..--vt, .-- 2,...1."._%, , • Z.11'..(0'''''_ ,,,'*4.-;--.7.,_'/a-t.,-,i,, -;'.:4,,k,?,-,__Z:•- ,..-;.:.•:,:4.-g./.:::‹.,,,, ,. ..1.,,, / ,..:•;•14%.;,„.-. in.:,,..1,,,,,.,.--._:,,'-:.-.,q,..,,,,i.__2„.,-,;...,,,-.7.,.. .,_ 1,..-'' 'i ..1 .;,•-'-,; ... I.'74:7: , ,..t•-•,,,, , 11 ''...isc // ' !1 It!'..:;.i.: - \\'..I, .........e , ,,,... „).....'"4..,-.."-.'-,'"..-±zs-...-_'. '-.•:V.,,.:7,,..i:',..7i-,.. 7- -..:-:--:,--'1. .<e•;t 4.:-."'-!-:: t-•-,::---,‘•--,-,=,."7-:: ::-',"-•'-,:--a'----r•---;--.=,-,•=s;:.''',7.-... ;-' / i i i ---,7,11:---:•, :\•,- _--- -'Y.-/-.----v-V4.4,:_--i.V.-iw,1*-•e.---7,--?,---I'-•-..t--•••, • •;-.--,„,---',,, ,,:•-,.,,----,-,:••,., '''.. . i / 1 N---,- .,..--' : ,...," -`,. •----i.' : . . • . • ' 1_ 5 12 1. 21) O5O45 12/07/04 Attachment C Sponsored By: Executive Committee /pr 1 MOTION NO. 04-5 2 A MOTION to amend the Urban Growth Area of King 3 County. This Motion also modifies the Potential Annexation 4 Area map in the Countywide Planning Policies. 5 6 7 WHEREAS,the Washington State Growth Management Act, RCW 36.70AJ 10 requires 8 counties to designate an urban growth area or areas within which urban growth shall be 9 encouraged and outside of which growth can occur only if it is not urban in nature; and 10 11 WHEREAS,Countywide Planning Policy FW=1 Step 8 recognizes that King County may 12 initiate amendments to the Urban Growth Area; and 13 14 WHEREAS,the King County Executive and the Metropolitan King County Council 15 requests the Growth Management Planning Council consider the attached amendment to 16 the Urban Growth Area for eventual adoption by the Metropolitan King County Council 17 and ratification by the cities; and 18 19 WHEREAS,Countywide Planning Policies LU-3I and LU-32 anticipate the collaborative 20 designation of Potential Annexation Areas and the eventual annexation of these areas by 21 cities. 22 23 WHEREAS,the attached amendment is supported by the City of Covington, which has 24 taken steps to insure that the area known as Covington Park will remain in park use in 25 perpetuity. 26 27 BE IT RESOLVED THAT THE GROWTH MANAGEMENT PLANNING COUNCIL OF 28 KING COUNTY HEREBY MOVES AS FOLLOWS: 29 • 30 1. Amend the Urban Growth Area(UGA)as designated by the Urban Growth Areas Map 3.1 in the Countywide Planning Policies to include the 29-acre area known as Covington 32 Park in the UGA, as shown on the map attached to this Motion. 33 34 35 - 1 - 15121 1 2. Amend the Interim Potential Annexation Area Map by including the 29-acre area 2 known as Covington Park in the Potential Annexation Area of the City of Covington. 3 4 3. This amendment is recommended to the Metropolitan King County Council and the 5 Cities of King County for adoption and ratification_ 6 7 8 9 10 ADOPTED by the Growth Management Planning Council of King County on 11 December 7,2004 in open session and signed by the chair of the GMPC. 12 13 14 15 Ron ims, air, wth Management Planning Council 16 17 2 • Itai '`` - 1 I Att>achrn nt 1 Proposed Amendment Covington Park Site - UGA Amendment Tne*mom horded on Ms woo vas keen mooted by Wore Goode loaf ne m a variety a e.wees and is s..e,ss to Orange: - e•'"se'remarks. t'eng Coun makeS ne•ea.«nndae =='�,,s ry Urban Growth Bounda ff Rural Residential mom"or Mdied.as In aceoreey.comeleeness k.wde.....iv.le Ire use ol wdr'..mnw,km. Key Coon" Mad ng ee save tr My general_sane..inb.X e adder..et e damage :minting °i was tout`. a` leas • •• Proposed Urban 'oa ae" eA"wg ken ere use Mouse d we ♦ •♦ o P Other Parks/Wilderness *wagon eo a.ed...a Sole w"` Growth Boundary .dormakaw ow IIM meek va..wked exam by on..panning..ol - 500 250 0 500 1•000 Study Area ` Incorporated Areas 1 ��Feet • L.__a rlCOrpOr wv.CWeJSOG6aweeeaGODSaamoa-Ism_wdMed..e_200m112S.a+9aewJeet_uen_aM.aa ! �i I • '-___" - •i-. • —_r I I I I __. 7 I . `` --• I }, I ,' _---I- j • 1 . -- ; 1 _ I • . _ _ if - - 4 :� _ - a b. __ _ __ L _; rat • 6 ry S 7dq'A • r 'r ._.-_.: _ ._. I___ - _ — i rr orX I 1 [- —1F '-1 { 1 ( I , 1 I: - i i , 'r 1 a --1 — � — �_ I— J __ t-- �— ' ' P 1 I I ; i I If--• ; 1 I I l t —f I I ' I i L I ii ' ; I — - - .,— — --ti 1 I 1 lqi . , i I 1 1 i l i '� C lNG, SON -1a---,� se \ S J��iJ/t i •• k _ � , �� i ,I 'Ir'r \ t 1. I 4,, .1 jJ (t } ' 1 ._`5t_Vg µe.'_ i ___ . ,...., ...., , ,„, i ,,- . ems" p '� _ : - I-_�-I : tom- . . ,1:._. • :/i,U pp.;±`^ I I I 1 1 H i -I f_J I.i I. ;1 I 1 1 1 I ThI I I I (1_I I i 41 i -1., d , i/re i 411104 100 sue Noe Metropolitan King County Council Growth Management and Unincorporated Areas Committee Revised Staff Report Agenda Item: 5 Name: Lauren Smith Proposed Ord: 2005-0045 Date: February 8, 2005 Attending: Paul Reitenbach, Senior Policy Analyst, DDES SUBJECT: Adopting amendments to the Countywide Planning Policies; amending the urban growth area boundary map, the interim potential annexation areas map, and the urban separator map. BACKGROUND: The Growth Management Planning Council (GMPC) is a formal body comprised of elected officials from King County, Seattle, Bellevue, the Suburban Cities, and Special Districts. The GMPC was created in 1992 by interlocal agreement, in response to a provision in the Washington State Growth Management Act (GMA) requiring cities and counties to work together to adopt Countywide Planning Policies (CPPs). Under GMA, countywide planning policies serve as the framework for each individual jurisdiction's comprehensive plan, and ensure countywide consistency with respect to land use planning efforts. As provided for in the interlocal agreement, the GMPC developed and recommended the Countywide Planning Policies, which were adopted by the King County Council and ratified by the cities. Subsequent amendments to the CPPs follow the same e process: recommendation by the GMPC, adoption by the King County Council, and ratification by the cities. Amendments to the CPPs become effective when ratified by ordinance or resolution by at least 30% of the city and county governments representing at least 70% of the population of King County. A city shall be deemed to have ratified an amendment to the CPPs unless, within 90 days of adoption by King County, the city by legislative action disapproves it. SUMMARY: Proposed Ordinance 2005-0045 would amend the Countywide Planning Policies by making adjustments to the Urban Growth Area, Potential Annexation Area, and Urban Separator maps. As part of the 2004 Comprehensive Plan Update, the King County Council made several changes to the urban growth area boundary. Because the GMA requires the County's comprehensive plan to be consistent with the Countywide Planning Policies, these amendments necessitate changes to the Urban Growth Area map in the countywide planning document. The county's redesignation of lands from rural to urban also requires changes to the Potential Annexation Area map, since urban areas are to eventually be annexed by cities. In one instance, a County amendment would require a change to the Urban Separator map. Because the Council had already made the policy decision(s) to amend the Urban Growth Area in the 2004 Comprehensive Plan Update, a detailed discussion of the individual map amendments is not included in this staff report. Instead, brief descriptions of each of the proposed changes are included below: Q:\COMMITTEE GM-2D05\FINAL Staff Reports12005-0045 CPPs-Map Changes REVISED.doc 2/9/2005 3:03 PM Amendments to the countywide Urban Growth Area Boundary map: • Redesignation of Redmond's Perrigo Park from rural to urban. • Redesignation of the Enumclaw Golf Course from rural to urban. • Redesignation of a small parcel on Cougar Mountain from rural to urban. • Redesignation of about 120 acres of the Bear Creek Urban Planned Development from urban to rural. • Redesignation of approximately 128 acres east of Kirkland (described as Willows Road) from rural to urban. • Redesignation of Covington Park from rural to urban. • Redesignation of about 6 acres including the Renton Christian Center and some land owned by King County from rural to urban. • Redesignation of about 9 acres adjacent to the Issaquah Spar Road from rural to urban, as well as the redesignation of a small (less than 3/4 acre) parcel in the same area from urban to rural. Amendments to the countywide Potential Annexation Areas map: • • Inclusion of Perrigo Park in Redmond's potential annexation area. • Inclusion of the Enumclaw Golf Course in Enumclaw's potential annexation area. • Inclusion of the Willows Road area in Kirkland's potential annexation area. • Inclusion of Covington Park within Covington's potential annexation area. • Inclusion of about 6 acres including the Renton Christian Center and some land owned by King County within Renton's potential annexation area. • Inclusion of about 9 acres adjacent to the Issaquah Spar Road within Issaquah's potential annexation area. • Resolution of a potential annexation area that was formerly claimed by both Sea Tac and Tukwila; this area is now within Tukwila's potential annexation area'. Amendments to the countywide Urban Separator map: • Creation of a new urban separator in the Willows Road area. Proposed Ordinance 2005-0045 would also ratify these changes on behalf of the population of unincorporated King County, as required by Countywide Planning Policy FW-1, Step 9. STAFF ANALYSIS: Council staff, through its participation on the GMPC's interjurisdictional staff team, has had an opportunity to review the proposed CPP map amendments, and concurs that they are the same map amendments made by the King County Council in the 2004 Comprehensive Plan Update. A more thorough description of the proposed changes is included as Attachment 3 to this staff report. Additionally, documentation on the use restrictions of the Enumclaw Golf Course, Covington Park and Perrigo Park is included as Attachment 4 to this staff report, pursuant to King County Comprehensive Plan Policy U-104. ATTACHMENTS: 1. Documentation of use restrictions for Enumclaw Golf Course, Covington Park and Perrigo Park. ' This is the only proposed change that was not driven by amendments to the King County Comprehensive Plan, but by the actions of cities working to resolve their PAAs. O:ICOMMITTEE GM-20051FINAL Staff Reports 1200 5-00 4 5 CPPs-Map Changes REVISED.doc 2/9/2005 3.03 PM New *0000, ATTACHMENT 1 Enumclaw Golf Course Summary of Use Restrictions Background: King County conveyed the Enumclaw Golf Course, an asset of the County park system, to the City of Enumclaw in 2003. At that time portions of the golf course were outside the urban growth boundary. Section 3 of the interlocal agreement transferring the Golf Course states: The King County Executive's proposed 2004 Comprehensive Land Use Plan Amendments will include a proposal to modify the City's urban growth boundary so that it will encompass the golf course property in a manner that will enable the City at its discretion to annex the Property into its municipal boundary. The 2004 King County Comprehensive Plan amendments, as adopted by the King County Council, include policy language to facilitate this referenced modification in the urban growth boundary. Specifically, policy U-104(c) regarding rural park properties adjacent to the urban growth line facilitates an urban designation of such park properties where"the property is or was formerly a King County park and is being or has been transferred to a city." Park Use Restrictions on the Enumclaw Golf Course: Section 2.1 of the interlocal agreement transferring the golf course to the City of Enumclaw places several restrictive covenants on the property which run with the land, including but not limited to the following: "The City covenants that the Property shall continue to be used in perpetuity for park or recreation purposes unless other equivalent lands or facilities within the county or the city are received in exchange therefore and the replacement lands or facilities are used in perpetuity for park or recreation purposes." "...the Property shall not be transferred or conveyed except by agreement providing that such lands shall continue to be used for the purposes contemplated by[the ordinance authorizing the Forward Thrust bond program], and that the Property shall not be converted to a different use than the park and recreation uses contemplated...unless other equivalent lands and facilities within the County or City shall be received in exchange therefore." Perrigo Park Summary of Use Restrictions Background: The City of Redmond had its grand opening of Perrigo Park in 2004 after spending $1.5 million to acquire the park property and $6 million to develop the property into a city park. The City initially purchased Perrigo Park property in 1994 with funding provided by the Washington State Interagency Committee for Outdoor Recreation (IAC). The City expanded Perrigo Park upon the acquisition of additional property purchased in 1997. Together, the four parcels that make up Perrigo Park today are 25.86 acres in size. At the time Perrigo Park opened the park was located adjacent to the City and urban growth boundary_ The adopted 2004 King County Comprehensive Plan amendments include policy language to facilitate modification of the urban growth boundary to include rural park properties adjacent to a city, with city commitment to use the property in perpetuity for park purposes. Specifically, policy U-104(a) facilitates an urban designation of such park properties where "the property is no more than 30 acres in size and was acquired by the city prior to 1994". With County Council adoption of these amendments in September 2004, and subsequent adoption and ratification of the countywide planning policies, the urban growth boundary will be moved to include Perrigo Park, which will enable the City to annex the property into its municipal boundary. Restrictions on Use of Perrigo Park: The initial park property was purchased with funding provided by the Washington State Interagency Committee for Outdoor Recreation(IAC). The grant agreement between the City of Redmond and IAC places several restrictive covenants on the property which run with the land, including but not limited to the following contained in Section 15(f): Deed of Right to Use Land for Public Recreation Purposes The Public Agency agrees to execute an instrument or instruments which contain(1) a legal description of the property acquired under this Project Agreement, (2) a conveyance to the State of Washington of the right to use the described real property forever for outdoor recreation purposes, and (3)a restriction on conversion of use of the land in the manner provided in RCW 43.99.100, whether or not the real property covered by the deed is marine recreation land..." Pursuant to this agreement, the City executed two deeds conveying to the State the right to use this property for outdoor recreation purposes and providing restrictions on the conversion of use of the land; the deeds also included a legal description of the properties. The City expanded Perrigo Park in 1997 with the acquisition of additional property purchased with city park bond funding. The Redmond City Council adopted Resolution No. 802 and Ordinance No. 1585 authorizing bonds for the purpose of"providing money to pay the capital costs of acquiring land for parks, recreation facilities and open spaces, and renovating existing park and recreation facilities"; a proposition authorizing issuance of bonds for parks, recreation and open space acquisition and renovation was approved by Redmond voters at the general election on November 7, 1989. Because the parcels acquired in 1997 were purchased with park bond funds, they are restricted to park purposes. Proposed Conservation Easement between the City of Covington and the Cascade Land Conservancy Document dated November 1, 2004 Prepared by: City of Covington The City of Covington and the Cascade Land Conservancy have reached a tentative agreement to execute a Conservation Easement that will encumber a City-owned 29.8 acre parcel, of property, purchased by the city in 2003 for park uses. Through the Easement, the City, as Grantor, would protect the subject property from residential or commercial development in perpetuity, reserving to the City the ability to build, own and operate a public park on the site. The acreage itself would be divided into two sections referred -to within the Easement as Section A and Section B (See attached Map). Section A, which contains some wetland areas and the Little Soos Creek, will be primarily unimproved open space, and will offer low impact recreational activities such as hiking and use as a nature conservancy. This Section will be managed so as to conserve fish and wildlife habitat, buffer aquifer recharge areas and protect open space. Some improvements are contemplated such as removal of dirt bike jumps and the maintenance of a non-commercial City-run tree nursery for replacing street trees and other plants on public works projects. Rights are also reserved on Section A to facilitate future improved trail access to the Soos Creek Park and Regional Trail. Section B would be used as an improved community park containing two soccer/multi-use fields, a softball diamond and stands, tennis courts, playgrounds, picnic shelters, basketball court and a fieldhouse. There will also be public restroom facilities and parking. This section of the park is planned for active recreation but will be blended with the adjacent open space to provide a harmonious buffer between the urban residential development on the east side of 180th Ave SE and the rural residential areas to the west and north. Any development rights forfeited by the City would be retained by the Cascade Land Conservancy and could be later sold to developers as part of a Transfer of Development Rights program. The Easement requires, however, that any monies generated from the sale of these development rights be utilized to create new conservancy zones within the City of Covington's defined Area of Interest. Both the City and the Cascade Land Conservancy are excited about this unique approach to conserving the environment and buffering the urban/rural boundaries with low impact improvements that provide needed recreational opportunities to both City and rural residents. In combination with the new Covington Aquatics Center at Tahoma, the park and adjacent pool facility will provide a campus- like recreation zone that will also allow the City to partner with the Tahoma School District and Tahoma High School on a variety of recreation and community projects. The School District and City are excited about jointly utilizing their resources as this will result in efficient use of tax dollars, especially in times where the Citizens have asked their public entities to maintain conservative budgets. Excerpts of the Easement language are provided in the attached Exhibit A. The legislative of the Growth Management Act include directives to "retain open space, enhance recreational opportunities, conserve fish and wildlife habitat, increase access to natural resource lands and water, and develop parks and recreation facilities" RCW 36.70A.020(9). Within the City of Covington (City), additional recreational opportunities are needed to meet the demand of an increasing population. Restricting the uses of Section A to passive recreation and Section B to passive and active recreation would advance one of the Growth Management Act's planning goals of developing parks and recreation facilities. 2.3 (7) ************************************************************************ Grantor intends that the Conservation Values of the Protected Property be preserved and maintained by permitting the continuation of only those land uses on the Protected Property that do not significantly impair or interfere with the Conservation Values. Such uses existing at the time of this grant include, without limitation, active/passive recreational, natural, scenic, open space and educational uses consistent with this Easement. 1'.L1 (6) ************************************************************************ Grantee is a publicly supported, tax-exempt nonprofit organization, qualified under Sections 501(c)(3) and 170(h) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended, and also qualified as a nonprofit nature conservancy corporation under RCW 64.04.130 and 84.34.250, whose primary purpose is to promote the preservation of open space and critically important ecological systems in King County and surrounding counties in Washington State. n 4 -c (6) ************************************************************************ The purpose of this Easement is to implement the mutual intentions of Grantor and Grantee as expressed in the above Recitals, which are incorporated herein by this reference, and in the provisions that follow, to assure that Section A will be retained forever predominantly in its natural, scenic, passive recreational and/or open space condition and, in addition,that Section B will be retained forever predominantly as an active recreational site,and to prevent any use of, or activity on the Protected Property that will significantly impair or interfere with the Conservation Values of the Protected Property(the"Purpose"). Grantor intends that this Easement will confine the use of, or activity on the Protected Property to such uses and activities that are consistent with this Purpose. C lI O **************************************************************4********* Any use of, or activity on the Protected Property inconsistent with the Purpose of this Easement is prohibited, and Grantor acknowledges and agrees that it will not conduct, engage in or permit any such use or activity. Without limiting the generality of this subsection, the following uses of,or activities on the Protected Property, though not an exhaustive list, are inconsistent with the Purpose of this Easement and shall be prohibited; except as expressly provided for and authorized in Section V above. *we KING COUNTY '1200 King County courthouse 516 Third Avenue Seattle,WA 98104 Signature Report February 14, 2005 • Ordinance 15122 Proposed No. 2005-0046.2 Sponsors Constantine 1 AN ORDINANCE adopting amendments to the 2 Countywide Planning Policies; revising targets for new 3 household and job growth for the period 2002-2022; 4 ratifying the amended Countywide Planning Policies for 5 unincorporated King County; and amending Ordinance 6 10450, Section 3, as amended, and K.C.C. 20.10.030 and 7 Ordinance 10450, Section 4, as amended, and K.C.C. 8 20.10.040. 9 10 11 BE IT ORDAINED BY THE COUNCIL OF KING COUNTY: 12 SECTION 1. Findings. The council makes the following findings: 13 A. The metropolitan King County council adopted and ratified the Growth 14 Management Planning Council recommended King County 2012 -Countywide Planning 15 Policies (Phase I)in July 1992, under Ordinance 10450. 1 Ordinance 15122 _`4010' 16 B. The metropolitan King County council adopted and ratified the Phase II 17 amendments to the Countywide Planning Policies on August 15, 1994, under Ordinance 18 _11446. 19 C. The Growth Management Planning Council met on September 45, 2004, and 20 voted to recommend amendments to the King County Countywide Planning Policies; 21 revising targets for new household and job growth for the period 2002-2022 by amending 22 Table LU-1. 23 SECTION 2. Ordinance 10450, Section 3, as amended, and K.C.C. 20.10.030 are 24 each hereby amended to read as follows: 25 Phase II. 26 A. The Phase II Amendments to the King County 2012 Countywide Planning 27 Policies attached to Ordinance 11446 are hereby approved and adopted. 28 B. The Phase II Amendments to the King County 2012-Countywide Planning 29 Policies are amended, as shown by Attachment 1 to Ordinance 12027. 30 C. The Phase II Amendments to the King County 2012 -Countywide Planning 31 Policies are amended, as shown by Attachment 1 to Ordinance 12421. 32 D. The Phase II Amendments to the King County 2012 -Countywide Planning 33 Policies are amended,as shown by Attachments 1 and 2 to Ordinance 13260. 34 E. The Phase II Amendments to the King County 2012 -Countywide Planning 35 Policies are amended, as shown by Attachments 1 through 4 to Ordinance 13415. 36 F. The Phase II Amendments to the King County 2012- Countywide Planning 37 Policies are amended, as shown by Attachments 1 through 3 to Ordinance 13858. 2 Ordinance 15122 38 G. The Phase II Amendments to the King County 2012—Countywide Planning 39 Policies are amended, as shown by Attachment 1 to Ordinance 14390. 40 H. The Phase II Amendments to the King County 2012—Countywide Planning 41 Policies are amended, as shown by Attachment 1 to Ordinance 14391. - 42 I. The Phase II Amendments to the King County 2012—Countywide Planning 43 Policies are amended,as shown by Attachment 1 to Ordinance 14392. 44 J. The Phase II Amendments to the King County 2012-Countywide Planning 45 Policies are amended, as shown by Attachment 1 to Ordinance 14652. 46 K. The Phase II Amendments to the King County 2012- Countywide Planning 47 Policies are amended,as shown by Attachments 1 through 3 to Ordinance 14653. 48 L. The Phase II Amendments to the King County 2012-Countywide Planning 49 Policies are amended, as shown by Attachment 1 to Ordinance 14654. 50 M. The Phase II Amendments to the King County 2012 -Countywide Planning 51 Policies are amended, as shown by Attachment 1 to Ordinance 14655. 52 N. The Phase II Amendments to the King County 2012-Countywide Planning 53 Policies are amended, as shown by Attachments 1 and 2 to Ordinance 14656. 54 O. The Phase II amendments to the King County 2012—Countywide Planning 55 Policies are amended, as shown by Attachment A to Ordinance 14844. 56 P. The Phase II Amendments to the King County 2012 - Countywide Planning 57 Policies are amended, as shown by Attachment A to this ordinance. 58 SECTION 3. Ordinance 10450, Section 4, as amended, and K.C.C. 20.10.040 are 59 each hereby amended to read as follows: 60 Ratification for unincorporated King County. 3 % Ordinance 15122 ISO 61 A. Countywide Planning Policies adopted by Ordinance 10450 for the purposes 62 specified are hereby ratified on behalf of the population of unincorporated King County. 63 B. The amendments to the Countywide Planning Policies adopted by Ordinance 64 10840 are hereby ratified on behalf of the population of unincorporated King County. 65 C. The amendments to the Countywide Planning Policies adopted by Ordinance 66 11061 are hereby ratified on behalf of the population of unincorporated King County. 67 D. The Phase II amendments to the King County 2012 Countywide Planning 68 Policies adopted by Ordinance 11446 are hereby ratified on behalf of the population of 69 unincorporated King County. 70 E. The amendments to the King County 2012 -Countywide Planning Policies, as 71 shown by Attachment 1 to Ordinance 12027 are hereby ratified on behalf of the 72 population of unincorporated King County. 73 F. The amendments to the King County 2012 -Countywide Planning Policies, as 74 shown by Attachment 1 to Ordinance 12421, are hereby ratified on behalf of the 75 population of unincorporated King County. 76 G. The amendments to the King County 2012 -Countywide Planning Policies, as 77 shown by Attachments 1 and 2 to Ordinance 13260, are hereby ratified on behalf of the 78 population of unincorporated King County. 79 H. The amendments to the King County 2012 -Countywide Planning Policies, as 80 shown by Attachment 1 through 4 to Ordinance 13415,are hereby ratified on behalf of 81 the population of unincorporated King County. 4 Ordinance 15122 '46"1 82 I. The amendments to the King County 2012 - Countywide Planning Policies, as 83 shown by Attachments 1 through 3 to Ordinance 13858,are hereby ratified on behalf of 84 the population of unincorporated King County. 85 J. The amendments to the King County 2012-Countywide Planning Policies, as 86 shown by Attachment 1 to Ordinance 14390, are hereby ratified on behalf of the 87 population of unincorporated King County. 88 K. The amendments to the King County 2012- Countywide Planning Policies, as 89 shown by Attachment 1 to Ordinance 14391, are hereby ratified on behalf of the 90 population of unincorporated King County. 91 L. The amendments to the King County 2012 - Countywide Planning Policies, as 92 shown by Attachment 1 to Ordinance 14392, are hereby ratified on behalf of the 93 population of unincorporated King County. 94 M. The amendments to the King County 2012 - Countywide Planning Policies, as 95 shown by Attachment 1 to Ordinance 14652, are hereby ratified on behalf of the 96 population of unincorporated King County. 97 N. The amendments to the King County 2012- Countywide Planning Policies, as 98 shown by Attachments 1 through 3 to Ordinance 14653, are hereby ratified on behalf of 99 the population of unincorporated King County. 100 O. The amendments to the King County 2012 -Countywide Planning Policies, as 101 shown by Attachment 1 to Ordinance 14654, are hereby ratified on behalf of the 102 population of unincorporated King County. 5 Ordinance 15122 %111i` Note 103 P. The amendments to the King County 2012 - Countywide Planning Policies, as 104 shown by Attachment 1 to Ordinance 14655, are hereby ratified on behalf of the 105 population of unincorporated King County. 106 Q. The amendments to the King County 2012 -Countywide Planning Policies, as 107 shown by Attachments 1 and 2 to Ordinance 14656, are hereby ratified on behalf of the 108 population of unincorporated King County. 109 R. The amendments to the King County 2012—Countywide Planning Policies, as 110 shown by Attachment A to Ordinance 14844, are hereby ratified on behalf of the 111 population of unincorporated King County. 112 S. The amendments to the King County 2012-Countywide Planning Policies, as • Ordinance 15122 *ow 'tool 113 shown by Attachment A to this ordinance, are hereby ratified on behalf of the population 114 of unincorporated King County. 115 Ordinance 15122 was introduced on 1/31/2005 and passed by the Metropolitan King County Council on 2/14/2005, by the following vote: Yes: 12 -Mr. Phillips,Mr. von Reichbauer, Ms. Lambert, Mr. Pelz, Mr. Dunn,Mr. Ferguson, Mr. Hammond,Mr. Gossett, Ms. Hague, Mr. Irons, Ms. Patterson and Mr. Constantine No: 0 Excused: 1 - Ms. Edmonds KING COUNTY COUNCI G CO Y,WAS ON • Larry Phillips,Chair t � ATTEST: Anne Noris,Clerk of the Council APPROVED this day f ,2005. Ron Si s,County Executive N 0 J I ry ( Attachments A.Motion No.04-4 —.,-; m � 7 • err. 15122 September 15, 2004 Attachment A Sponsored By: Executive Committee /cf 1 MOTION NO. 04-4 2 A MOTION by the Growth Management Planning Council of King 3 County recommending the amendment of the Countywide Planning 4 Policies, revising targets for new household and job growth for the 5 period 2001-2022 by amending Table LU-1: 2001-2022 Household 6 and Employment Growth Targets which will be located in Section III. 7 C of the Countywide Planning Policies_ 8 • 9 WHEREAS, the 1994 Countywide Planning Policies established a housing target range for 10 each city and for King County; and 11 12 WHEREAS, the Growth Management Planning Council adopted revised household and 13 job growth targets for the period 2001 —2022 on September 25, 2002; and 14 15 WHEREAS, on May 26, 2004, the Growth Management Planning Council met and 16 discussed revisions to the adopted household and employment targets for the period 2001- 17 2022_ 18 THE GROWTH MANAGEMENT PLANNING COUNCIL OF KING COUNTY 19 HEREBY MOVES AS FOLLOWS: 20 21 The attached"Revised Table LU-I: 2001-2022 Household and Employment 22 Growth Targets"is hereby recommended for adoption in the Countywide Planning 23 Policies to revise the household growth targets and potential annexation area targets 24 to reflect the target extension from January 1,2001 through December 31, 2022_ 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 UGMPC/04GMPC/Mot04-4-doc - j - tow 15122 5 1 2 3 ADOPTED by the Growth Management Planning Council of King County on 4 September 15, 2004 in open session and signed by the chair of GMPC. 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 tins,C air,Growth Management Planning Council 12 Attachment: . 13 1. Revised Table LU-1: 2001-2022 Household and Employment Growth Targets 14 (file LU-1_Rev2004.xls). 15 16 17 UGMPC/04GMPCIMot04-3.doc - 2 - .• fl +F4ctlintrIA- 1 . 15122 ..„.„7 ,•,..„,,z:.„,,,.,„:=_„•:.„,:;,„„,,,-y„,,„,•••,•,.::.,„„,__,,,_„._„,,,_„_„:„....-„,4:.„,::,,.,_,=„,...._„..„••.,,,•.:,... ...„..„...,..,..,.,..„:„.,...,,•.....,•....,„,,,„„„•.,„_,....,,..„.„......_.„.„.....4.,..„_,,_..„,,..,,„.L,„4„,„.....„.„,.,..,„,,,,,,,„,,,„,„f..:4 Housing --Subareas Capacity PAA H 1 lob Capacity in PAA lob Target Capacity in lob Target g PAA* Target PAA* Target South King County Algona 298k 108 - Auburn ° 2,635 252 252 Black Diamond 1,099 2,525 Buricn 1,5521 1,712 - Covington r 900 Des Moines 1,576 5 -'- %=.i- 1 1,695 Federal Way 6,188 3,754 __-==- „a 7,481 134 134 Kent 4,284 1,763 `" `r 11,500 ` ;__- - :- o , Milton _ 50 1°6MIIM4 1,054 Maple Valley _ 300 804 Normandy Park 100 67 Pacific .1.. ;_; 41 127 _- ri_' .#j gts Renton 6,198_ - 5,622 - '== _i- CI i 27,597 458 458 ScaTac 4,478 =, -' a a 9,288 3,200 E Tukwila ® ,►, dls� t6• 941:_...�n A Unincorp King County 4,935 a_ -- t4 2,582 1-_' 71; Total _ 42,355 15,952 4,935 89,500 2,582 2,582 East King County Beaux Arts Village 3 - Bellevue 10,117 184 178 40,000 27 27 Bothell 1,751 603 584 2,000 174 174 Clyde Hill 21 - Hunts Point 1 _ Issaquah 3,993 827 802 14,000 1 1 Kenmore 2,325 _ 2,800 Kirkland 5,480 770 747 8,800 221 221 Medina 31 Mercer Island 1,437, 800 Newcastle 863 1 I 500 Redmond 9,083 402 390 21,760 21 21 Sammamish 3,842 1,230 Woodinville 1,869 2,000 Yarrow Point 28 Unincorp King King County 6,801 ••4,222 "4,099 4,637 "4,193 '•4,193 Total 47,645 7,009 6,801 98,527 4,637 4,637 Sea-Shore Lake Forest Park 538 455 Seattle 51,510 92,083 Shoreline 2,651 2,618 Unincorp King Countys'' 1,670 1,670 1,670 694 1,544 694 Total 56,369 1,670 1,670 95,850 1,544 694 • Rural Cities••'• Carnation 246 75 Duvall 1,037 1,125 Enumclaw 1,927 1,125 North Bend 636 1,125 Skykomish 20 - Snoqualmie 1,697 1,800 Total 5,563 5,250 ICing County Total 151,932 289,127 •PAA:Potential Annexation Area in Unincorporated King County Urban Area;•'Bear Creek UPD,•"North Highline ••"The Rural Cities'targets are for the current city limits and rural expansion area for each city Thus the methodology for adjusting targets as annexations occur is not applicable to the rural cities. Editor's Note Source for 2001 housing and job capacity figures for PAAs is the 2002 King County Buildable Lands evaluation. Subarea unincorporated targets were allocated to PAAs based on proportional capacity- Revised per Motion 04-4,Sept 2004 - `tort' Nue • Metropolitan King County Council Growth Management and Unincorporated Areas Committee Revised Staff Report Agenda Item: 4 Name: Lauren Smith Proposed Ord: 2005-0046 Date: February 14, 2005 Attending: Paul Reitenbach, Senior Policy Analyst, DDES COMMITTEE ACTION: The Growth Management and Unincorporated Areas Committee recommended a "DO Pass Substitute" recommendation for Proposed Ordinance 2005-0046. The committee passed amendment A-1, a technical amendment to replace the current attachment to the ordinance (GMPC Motion 04-3)with a new attachment (GMPC Motion 04-4). The transmittal package included the wrong GMPC Motion. SUBJECT: Adopting amendments to the Countywide Planning Policies; revising targets for new household and job growth for the period 2002-2022. BACKGROUND: The Growth Management Planning Council (GMPC) is a formal body comprised of elected officials from King County, Seattle, Bellevue, the Suburban Cities, and Special Districts. The GMPC was created in 1992 by interlocal agreement, in response to a provision in the Washington State Growth Management Act (GMA) requiring cities and counties to work together to adopt Countywide Planning Policies (CPPs). Under GMA, countywide planning policies serve as the framework for each individual jurisdiction's comprehensive plan, and ensure countywide consistency with respect to land use planning efforts. As provided for in the interlocal agreement, the GMPC developed and recommended the Countywide Planning Policies, which were adopted by the King County Council and ratified by the cities. Subsequent amendments to the CPPs follow the same process: recommendation by the GMPC, adoption by the King County Council, and ratification by the cities. Amendments to the CPPs become effective when ratified by ordinance or resolution by at least 30% of the city and county governments representing at least 70% of the population of King County. A city shall be deemed to have ratified an amendment to the CPPs unless, within 90 days of adoption by King County, the city by legislative action disapproves it. SUMMARY: Proposed Ordinance 2005-0046 would amend the Countywide Planning Policies by making technical adjustments to the household and employment growth targets. These adjustments were recommended by the Growth Management Planning Council through their unanimous approval of Motion 04-4 on September 15, 2004. ()COMMITTEE GM-2005\FINAL Staff Reports 12005-004 6 Revised SR 2-14-05.doc 2/9/2005 219 PM Revisions to the growth targets were discussed by the GMPC at a meeting on May 26 and again on September 15, 2004. The proposed changes are as follows: 1. Allocating a 592-household target to the West Hill unincorporated area, which mistakenly was not assigned a household target during the last round of updates. 2. Adjusting Tukwila's growth targets to include projected new households and jobs in an area that was formerly claimed by both SeaTac and Tukwila (total change to Tukwila's growth targets: +8 households, +993 jobs). 3. A correction increasing the job target for the City of Kent's potential annexation area from 44 jobs to 287 jobs, commensurate with the employment capacity of the area. 4. An adjustment of household and job targets for Pacific and Auburn to reflect a de- annexation by Pacific and annexation by Auburn, and a shift of household targets from Pacific to Covington. Proposed Ordinance 2005-0046 would also ratify these changes on behalf of the population of unincorporated King County, as required by Countywide Planning Policy FW-1, Step 9. STAFF ANALYSIS: Council staff, through its participation on the GMPC's interjurisdictional staff team, has had an opportunity to review the proposed target adjustments, and concurs that they are technical in nature and have been approved by the affected jurisdictions via the GMPC action. A complete description of the proposed changes is included as Attachment 4 to this staff report. • Q:\COMMITTEE GM-2005\FINAL Staff Reports12005-0046 Revised SR 2:14-05 doc 2/9/2005 2:19 PM Noe KING COUNTY Nsoe 1200 King County Courthouse ` Signature Report 516 Third Avenue Seattle,WA 98104 February 14, 2005 Ordinance 15123 Proposed No. 2005-0047.2 Sponsors Constantine 1 AN ORDINANCE adopting amendments to the 2 Countywide Planning Policies; designating downtown 3 Burien as an Urban Center; ratifying the amended 4 Countywide Planning Policies for unincorporated King 5 County; and amending Ordinance 10450, Section 3, as 6 amended, and K.C.C. 20.10.030 and Ordinance 10450, 7 Section 4, as amended, and K.C.C. 20.10.040. 8 9 10 BE IT ORDAINED BY THE COUNCIL OF KING COUNTY: 11 SECTION 1. Findings. The council makes the following findings: 12 A. The metropolitan King County council adopted and ratified the Growth 13 Management Planning Council recommended King County 2012 - Countywide Planning 14 Policies (Phase I) in July 1992, under Ordinance 10450. 15 B. The metropolitan King County council adopted and ratified the Phase II 16 amendments to the Countywide Planning Policies on August 15, 1994, under Ordinance 17 11446. 1 %1100 'NO Ordinance 15123 18 C. The Growth Management Planning Council met on September 15,2004, and 19 voted to recommend amendments to the King County Countywide Planning Policies 20 designating downtown Burien as an Urban Center. 21 SECTION 2. Ordinance 10450, Section 3, as amended, and K.C.C. 20.10.030 are 22 each hereby amended to read as follows: 23 Phase II. 24 A. The Phase II Amendments to the King County 2012 Countywide Planning 25 Policies attached to Ordinance 11446 are hereby approved and adopted_ 26 B. The Phase II Amendments to the King County 2012 -Countywide Planning 27 Policies are amended, as shown by Attachment 1 to Ordinance 12027_ 28 C. The Phase II Amendments to the King County 2012-Countywide Planning 29 Policies are amended, as shown by Attachment 1 to Ordinance 12421. 30 D. The Phase II Amendments to the King County 2012 -Countywide Planning 31 Policies are amended, as shown by Attachments 1 and 2 to Ordinance 13260. 32 E. The Phase II Amendments to the King County 2012 - Countywide Planning 33 Policies are amended, as shown by Attachments 1 through 4 to Ordinance 13415. 34 F. The Phase II Amendments to the King County 2012-Countywide Planning 35 Policies are amended, as shown by Attachments 1 through 3 to Ordinance 13858. 36 G. The Phase II Amendments to the King County 2012—Countywide Planning 37 Policies are amended, as shown by Attachment 1 to Ordinance 14390. 38 H. The Phase II Amendments to the King County 2012—Countywide Planning 39 Policies are amended, as shown by Attachment 1 to Ordinance 14391. 7 Ordinance 15123 *le 40 I. The Phase II Amendments to the King County 2012—Countywide Planning 41 Policies are amended, as shown by Attachment 1 to Ordinance 14392. 42 J. The Phase II Amendments to the King County 2012 - Countywide Planning 43 Policies are amended, as shown by Attachment 1 to Ordinance 14652. - 44 K. The Phase II Amendments to the King County 2012 -Countywide Planning 45 Policies are amended, as shown by Attachments 1 through 3 to Ordinance 14653. 46 L. The Phase II Amendments to the King County 2012 -Countywide Planning 47 Policies are amended, as shown by Attachment 1 to Ordinance 14654. 48 M. The Phase II Amendments to the King County 2012 - Countywide Planning 49 Policies are amended, as shown by Attachment 1 to Ordinance 14655. 50 N. The Phase II Amendments to the King County 2012 - Countywide Planning 51 Policies are amended, as shown by Attachments 1 and 2 to Ordinance 14656. 52 O. The Phase II amendments to the King County 2012—Countywide Planning 53 Policies are amended, as shown by Attachment A to Ordinance 14844. 54 P. The Phase II Amendments to the King County 2012 -Countywide Planning 55 Policies are amended, as shown by Attachment A to this ordinance. 56 SECTION 3. Ordinance 10450, Section 4, as amended, and K.C.C. 20.10.040 are 57 each hereby amended to read as follows: 58 Ratification for unincorporated King County. 59 A. Countywide Planning Policies adopted by Ordinance 10450 for the purposes 60 specified are hereby ratified on behalf of the population of unincorporated King County. 61 13. The amendments to the Countywide Planning Policies adopted by Ordinance 62 10840 are hereby ratified on behalf of the population of unincorporated King County. 3 Ordinance 15123 63 C. The amendments to the Countywide Planning Policies adopted by Ordinance 64 11061 are hereby ratified on behalf of the population of unincorporated King County. 65 D. The Phase II amendments to the King County 2012 Countywide Planning 66 Policies adopted by Ordinance 11446 are hereby ratified on behalf of the population of 67 unincorporated King County. 68 E. The amendments to the King County 2012- Countywide Planning Policies, as 69 shown by Attachment 1 to Ordinance 12027 are hereby ratified on behalf of the 70 population of unincorporated King County. 71 F. The amendments to the King County 2012 -Countywide Planning Policies, as 72 shown by Attachment 1 to Ordinance 12421, are hereby ratified on behalf of the 73 population of unincorporated King County. 74 G. The amendments to the King County 2012 -Countywide Planning Policies, as 75 shown by Attachments 1 and 2 to Ordinance 13260, are hereby ratified on behalf of the 76 population of unincorporated King County. 77 H. The amendments to the King County 2012 -Countywide Planning Policies, as 78 shown by Attachment 1 through 4 to Ordinance 13415,are hereby ratified on behalf of 79 the population of unincorporated King County. 80 I. The amendments to the King County 2012 -Countywide Planning Policies, as 81 shown by Attachments 1 through 3 to Ordinance 13858, are hereby ratified on behalf of 82 the population of unincorporated King County. 83 J. The amendments to the King County 2012 -Countywide Planning Policies, as 84 shown by Attachment 1 to Ordinance 14390, are hereby ratified on behalf of the 85 population of unincorporated King County. 4 Ordinance 15123 '`"41 `'"'" 86 K. The amendments.to the King County 2012 -Countywide Planning Policies, as 87 shown by Attachment 1 to Ordinance 14391, are hereby ratified on behalf of the 88 population of unincorporated King County. 89 L. The amendments to the King County 2012- Countywide Planning Policies, as 90 shown by Attachment 1 to Ordinance 14392,are hereby ratified on behalf of the 91 population of unincorporated King County. 92 M. The amendments to the King County 2012 - Countywide Planning Policies, as 93 shown by Attachment 1 to Ordinance 14652, are hereby ratified on behalf of the 94 population of unincorporated King County. 95 N. The amendments to the King County 2012 -Countywide Planning Policies, as 96 shown by Attachments 1 through 3 to Ordinance 14653, are hereby ratified on behalf of 97 the population of unincorporated King County. 98 O. The amendments to the King County 2012 - Countywide Planning Policies, as 99 shown by Attachment 1 to Ordinance 14654, are hereby ratified on behalf of the 100 population of unincorporated King County. 101 P. The amendments to the King County 2012 -Countywide Planning Policies, as 102 shown by Attachment 1 to Ordinance 14655,are hereby ratified on behalf of the 103 population of unincorporated King County. 104 Q. The amendments to the King County 2012 - Countywide Planning Policies, as 105 shown by Attachments 1 and 2 to Ordinance 14656, are hereby ratified on behalf of the 106 population of unincorporated King County. 5 Ordinance 15123 107 R. The amendments to the King County 2012—Countywide Planning Policies, as 108 shown by Attachment A to Ordinance 14844, are hereby ratified on behalf of the 109 population of unincorporated King County. 110 S. The amendments to the King County 2012-Countywide Planning Policies, as • Ordinance 15123 Neve 111 shown by Attachment A to this ordinance, are hereby ratified on behalf of the population 112 of unincorporated King County. 113 Ordinance 15123 was introduced on 1/31/2005 and passed by the Metropolitan King County Council on 2/14/2005,by the following vote: Yes: 12 -Mr. Phillips, Mr. von Reichbauer, Ms. Lambert, Mr. Pelz, Mr. Dunn,Mr. Ferguson, Mr. Hammond, Mr. Gossett, Ms. Hague, Mr. Irons, Ms. Patterson and Mr. Constantine No: 0 Excused: 1 Ms. Edmonds KING COUNTY COUNC KING C Y,WAS NG N Larry Phillips,Chaii d ?‘"- ATTEST: Anne Noris,Clerk of the Council APPROVED this 0207_ day of ,2005. Ron Sims, ounty Executive a Gil ) Fri i cc".) €3J rT r Attachments A. Motion No.04-3 < m - 0 c=) cc" • 7 15123 September 15, 2004 Attachment A Sponsored By: Executive Committee 1 . MOTION NO. 04-3 2 A MOTION to amend the Countywide Planning Policies by 3 designating Downtown Burien as an Urban Center. Downtown 4 Burien is added to the list of Urban Centers following 5 Countywide.Planning Policy LU 39_ 6 7 8 WHEREAS, A goal of the Growth Management Ad is to encourage development in Urban 9 Areas where adequate public facilities exist or can be provided in an efficient manner; 10 11 WHEREAS, Policy LU-39 of the Countywide Planning Policies of King County describes 12 the criteria for Urban Center designation; 13 14 WHEREAS, Policy LU-40 of the Countywide Planning Policies of King County describes 15 standards for planned land uses within Urban Centers; 16 - 17 WHEREAS, the City of Burien has demonstrated that Downtown Burien meets the criteria 18 for designation as.an Urban Center;and 19 20 WHEREAS, King County Comprehensive Plan Policy U-106 supports the development of 21 Urban Centers to meet the region's needs for housing, jobs, services, culture and 22 recreation_ 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 (K M rCR oo2GM pC/M o t jono2-4.aoc 15123 1 2 3 4 THE GROWTH MANAGEMENT PLANNING COUNCIL OF KING COUNTY 5 HEREBY MOVES AS FOLLOWS: 6 - 7 Downtown Burien is designated as an Urban Center_ The list of Urban Centers following 8 Countywide Planning Policy LU-39 is modified to include Downtown Burien. 9 10 11 ADOPTED by the Growth Management Planning Council of King County on 12 September 15, 2004 in open session and signed by the chair of GMPC. I3 14 15 16 17 18 Ron Sims,Chair, Growth Management Planning Council UGM PC/2002GM PCJM otion02-6_doc Nap' Now Metropolitan King County Council Growth Management and Unincorporated Areas Committee Revised Staff Report Agenda Item: 3 Name: Lauren Smith Proposed Ord: 2005-0047 Date: February 15, 2005 Attending: Scott Greenberg, Community Development Director, City of Burien COMMITTEE ACTION: The Growth Management and Unincorporated Areas Committee recommended a "DO Pass Substitute" recommendation for Proposed Ordinance 2005-0047. The committee passed amendment A-1, a technical amendment to replace the current attachment to the ordinance (GMPC Motion 04-4) with a new attachment (GMPC Motion 04-3). The transmittal package included the wrong GMPC Motion. SUBJECT: Adopting amendments to the Countywide Planning Policies; designating downtown Burien as an Urban Center. BACKGROUND: The Growth Management Planning Council and Countywide Planning Policies The Growth Management Planning Council (GMPC) is a formal body comprised of elected officials from King County, Seattle, Bellevue, the Suburban Cities, and Special Districts. The GMPC was created in 1992 by interlocal agreement, in response to a provision in the Washington State Growth Management Act (GMA) requiring cities and counties to work together to adopt Countywide Planning Policies (CPPs). Under GMA, countywide planning policies serve as the framework for each individual jurisdiction's comprehensive plan, and ensure countywide consistency with respect to land use planning efforts. As provided for in the interlocal agreement, the GMPC developed and recommended the Countywide Planning Policies, which were adopted by the King County Council and ratified by the cities. Subsequent amendments to the CPPs follow the same process: recommendation by the GMPC, adoption by the King County Council, and ratification by the cities. Amendments to the CPPs become effective when ratified by ordinance or resolution by at least 30% of the city and county governments representing at least 70% of the population of King County. A city shall be deemed to have ratified an amendment to the CPPs unless, within 90 days of adoption by King County, the city by legislative action disapproves it. SUMMARY: Proposed Ordinance 2005-0047 would amend the Countywide Planning Policies by adding downtown Burien to the list of Urban Centers in Policy LU-39. The ordinance would also ratify the change on behalf of the population of unincorporated King County, as required by Countywide Planning Policy FW-1, Step 9. O-.1COMMITTEE GM-20051�tNAL Staff Repor1s120 0 5-004 7 CPPs-Bunen Urban Center REVISED doc 2/9/2005 2.52 PM • STAFF ANALYSIS: Proposed Designation of Downtown Burien as an Urban Center The City of Burien requests that the King County Council amend the Countywide Planning Policies to add its downtown core to the list of Urban Centers in Policy LU-39. The city has followed the correct process for obtaining such a designation, starting with amending its own plans, policies and capital improvement programs, and also by securing the recommendation of the Growth Management Planning Council, which indicated its approval through the unanimous adoption of Motion 04-3 on September 15, 2004. The final steps in the center designation process are approval by the King County Council and ratification by the cities (see background section for a detailed explanation of the ratification process). Requirements for Urban Center Designation The Countywide Planning Policies describe Urban Centers as areas of concentrated employment and housing, with direct service by high-capacity transit and a wide range of other land uses. Collectively, they are expected to account for up to one half of King County's employment growth and one quarter of household growth over the next 20 years. The list of Urban Centers in Countywide Planning Policy LU-39 currently includes: • Auburn • Federal Way • Renton • Bellevue • Kirkland • Seattle (5) • Kent • Redmond (2) • Tukwila In order to be designated as an Urban Center,jurisdictions must meet specific criteria in the Countywide Planning Policies, including having planned land uses to accommodate: .. A minimum of 15,000 jobs within one-half mile of a transit center; 2. At a minimum, an average of 50 employees per gross acre; and 3. At a minimum, an average of 15 households per acre. In addition to these requirements, Policy LU-40 states that fully realized Urban Centers shall be characterized by the following: a. Clearly defined geographic boundaries; b. An intensity/density of land uses sufficient to support effective and rapid transit; c. Pedestrian emphasis within the Center; d. Emphasis on superior urban design which reflects the local community; e. Limitations on single-occupancy vehicle usage during peak commute hours; r. A broad array of land uses and choices within those land uses for employees and residents; g. Sufficient public open spaces and recreational opportunities; and h. Uses which provide both daytime and nighttime activities in the Center. City of Burien's Existing and Planned Conditions The Countywide Planning Policies recognize that Urban Centers vary substantially in the number of households and jobs they contain at the time of their initial designation, and thus the decision to designate an Urban Center is based on planned, not existing, densities. A jurisdiction shows its commitment to realizing these densities through its comprehensive plan policies, a supportive regulatory environment and a commitment to provide adequate infrastructure. 0-\COMMITTEE GM-2005\FINAL Staff Reports\2005-0047 CPPs-Burien Urban Center REVISED doc 2/9/2005 2:52 PM • The table on the next page shows Burien's existing conditions, as well as future growth projections for the near future (10-20 years, or"mid-range), and beyond (20+years, or"long-range). The long-range projected capacity envisions an Urban Center that is consistent with the requirements in the Countywide Planning Policies. I. Burien Urban Center— Existing and Planned Capacity Scenario Households Households/Acre Employees Employees/Acre Existing Conditions 1,433 4.1 4,025 11.4 Mid-Range Projected Capacity 2,689 7.6 8,692 24.6 Long-Range Projected Capacity 6,294 17.8 18,028 51.1 GMPC Recommendation The GMPC, through the unanimous adoption of Motion 04-3, has declared that the City of Burien has demonstrated its commitment to developing a fully realized Urban Center as envisioned in the Countywide Planning Policies. Specific findings include: • Burien's comprehensive plan and downtown plan establish the policy framework for achieving a compact, mixed use, transit and pedestrian oriented Urban Center. • Burien has implemented its plans with supportive land use and development regulations, including unlimited residential density in the downtown zone, increased height limits, design guidelines and streamlined permit processing. • The city has planned for future growth within the Urban Center through recent investments in utility, street and sidewalk upgrades, and in land assembly and acquisition. These efforts include plans for a mixed-use Town Square development, and plans for a transit-oriented development project. Council staff, through its participation on the GMPC's interjurisdictional staff team, has had an opportunity to thoroughly review the city's proposal, and concurs that it meets the requirements in the Countywide Planning Policies for designation as an Urban Center. A complete analysis of the city's proposal as presented to the GMPC is included as Attachment 4 to this staff report. Q\COMMITTEE GM-2005\FINAL Staff Reports\2005-0047 CPPs-Buren Urban Center REVISED-doc 2/9/2005 2:52 PM rrr/ CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON RESOLUTION NO. 3 6 8 8 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON, RATIFYING AMENDMENTS TO THE COUNTYWIDE PLANNING POLICIES. WHEREAS, the Growth Management Act, RCW 36.70A.210, mandates the development and adoption of Countywide Planning Policies for King County; and WHEREAS, King County, the City of Seattle, the City of Bellevue and the Suburban Cities of King County have met jointly as the Growth Management Planning Council(GMPC)to develop and recommend Countywide Planning Policies; and WHEREAS,the City of Renton has ratified the Countywide Planning Policies and subsequent amendments; and WHEREAS, Countywide Planning Policy FW-1 Step 9 provides for an amendment process to change the Planning Policies as may be necessary from time to time; and WHEREAS, on March 8, 2004, the Metropolitan King County Council took action ratifying the proposed amendment to the King County Countywide Planning Policies designating Downtown Auburn as an urban center on behalf of unincorporated King County;and WHEREAS, the amendment process requires ratification of proposed amendments by at least 30 percent of the City and County governments representing 70 percent of the population in King County; NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON, DO RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS: 1 RESOLUTION NO. 368 8 SECTION I. The above findings are true and correct in all respects. SECTION II. The proposed amendments to the Countywide Planning Policies are consistent with the adopted City Comprehensive Plan and the adopted City Business Plan. SECTION III. The best interests and general welfare of the City of Renton would be served by ratification of Ordinance 14844 (GMPC Motion 03-2) designating downtown Auburn as an urban center as approved by the King County Council and the Growth Management Planning Council. PASSED BY THE CITY COUNCIL this 5th day of April , 2004. idei r t`•./ Wa Bonnie I. Walton, City Clerk APPROVED BY THE MAYOR this 5th day of April , 2004. 4yekei - Kathy Kolker-Wheeler, Mayor Approved as to form: Lawrence J. Warren, City Attorney RES.1037:3/30/04:ma 2 April 5,2004 Renton City Council Minutes Page 101 • Referral 1877 -Police Department Staffing. This issue was discussed at both Council workshops this year, and plans have been recommended to the Council for consideration. Specifically, "RENSTAT,"Renton's computer statistic and crime analysis approach to directing patrol services is a response to this referral. Therefore,the Committee recommended that this issue be removed from the active referral list and that updates be given to Council on the "RENSTAT"program. • Referral 1905 -Peddler's Hours of Operation. The Committee reviewed the ordinance, and because Renton's ordinance is as restrictive as most other municipal ordinances,recommended no changes be made at this time. MOVED BY LAW,SECONDED BY CLAWSON, COUNCIL CONCUR IN THE COMMITTEE REPORT.* • Councilman Clawson noted the amount of work that has been done on the police staffing issue, and stated that if the "RENSTAT"proposal can be funded, it will benefit Renton residents and the Police Department. *MOTION CARRIED. Utilities Committee Utilities Committee Chair Clawson presented a report concurring with the Utility: Highlands recommendation of the Planning/Building/Public Works Department that Redevelopment Area Water Council approve the funding of$100,000 from the Highlands Redevelopment Main Improvements Funding Fund to pay for a share of the water main improvements in the Highlands and for the Harrington Square Development. The Committee further recommended that Council authorize staff to proceed with the development of a special assessment district to recuperate the City's share of the improvements. The collected assessment will repay the Highlands Redevelopment Fund first,and the Water Utility's share second. MOVED BY CLAWSON, SECONDED BY BRIERE, COUNCIL CONCUR IN THE COMMITTEE REPORT. CARRIED. Transportation(Aviation) Transportation(Aviation)Committee Chair Palmer presented a report regarding Committee traffic safety on Edmonds Ave. SE at SE 2nd Pl. (Liberty Ridge Subdivision). Transportation: Edmonds Ave The Committee recommended Council authorize the Administration to perform SE/SE 2nd P1 Intersection the following tasks to improve the traffic safety at the intersection of Edmonds Safety Concerns Ave. SE and SE 2nd Pl.: 1. Install channelization on Edmonds Ave. SE in the vicinity of the curve approaching the intersection of SE 2nd Pl.; and 2. Investigate warrants for,and install as required, a residential warning sign with a 20-miles-per-hour advisory plate. MOVED BY PALMER, SECONDED BY CORMAN, COUNCIL CONCUR IN THE COMMITTEE REPORT. CARRIED. ORDINANCES AND The following resolution was presented for reading and adoption: RESOLUTIONS Resolution#3688 A resolution was read ratifying 2003 amendments to the Growth Management EDNSP: 2003 Countywide Council's Countywide Planning Policies. MOVED BY BRIERE,SECONDED Planning Policies Amendment BY CLAWSON, COUNCIL ADOPT THE RESOLUTION AS READ. CARRIED. The following ordinance was presented for second and final reading and adoption: April 5,2004 ►' Renton City Council Minutes Page 99 Ms. Quesenberry pointed out that the City's website displays photographs of the convicted sex offenders from the time they were originally arrested;however, the photographs on the sex offender notifications distributed throughout the community are of when they were released from incarceration. Noting that the appearance of juvenile offenders change as they mature, she recommended that the website display the photographs of when the offenders were released. Mayor Keolker-Wheeler stated the Administration would investigate the matter. CONSENT AGENDA Items on the consent agenda are adopted by one motion which follows the listing. Council Meeting Minutes of Approval of Council meeting minutes of March 22,2004. Council concur. March 22,2004 Appointment: Planning Mayor Keolker-Wheeler appointed Nancy G. Osborn,4635 Morris Ave. S.,#F, Commission Renton, 98055, to the Planning Commission to fill the unexpired term of Eric Cameron, who has resigned(term to expire 6/30/2006). Refer to Community Services Committee. Court Case: North Coast Court Case filed by Nancy K. Cary of Hershner,Hunter,Andrews,Neill& Electric Company, CRT-04- Smith,LLP,PO Box 1475,Eugene,OR,97440,on behalf of North Coast 002 Electric Company,regarding alleged payments owed the plaintiff for various projects,including the Renton Fire Station#12 construction project(CAG-02- 177). Refer to City Attorney and Insurance Services. CAG: 04-027, SW 7th St City Clerk reported bid opening on 3/30/2004 for CAG-04-027, SW 7th Street Drainage Improvement Phase Drainage Improvement Project Phase II(Lind Ave. SW to Morris Ave. S.); II,Frank Coluccio Const Co eight bids; engineer's estimate$2,931,000;and submitted staff recommendation to award the contract to the low bidder,Frank Coluccio Construction Company, Inc., in the amount of$3,045,312. Council concur. CAG: 03-126,Wetland City Clerk reported bid opening on 3/30/2004 for CAG-03-126,Wetland Mitigation Bank Site Fence, Mitigation Bank Site Fence Project;four bids;engineer's estimate$56,642.37; Construct Co and submitted staff recommendation to award the contract to the low bidder, Construct Co.,LLC, in the amount of$60,906.24. Council concur. Development Services: Development Services Division recommended approval to permit wireless Wireless Communication communication facilities in residential zones within public rights-of-way to Facilities in Residential Zones improve cellular phone service. Refer to Planning and Development Committee. EDNSP: 2003 Countywide Economic Development,Neighborhoods and Strategic Planning Department Planning Policies Amendment recommended adoption of a resolution ratifying a 2003 amendment to the Growth Moment Planning Councils Countywide Planning Policies concerning the designation of downtown Auburn as an Urban Center. Council concur. (See page 101 for resolution.) Annexation: Johnson, 142nd Economic Development,Neighborhoods and Strategic Planning Department Ave SE recommended a public hearing be set on 4/19/2004 to consider the 60%Direct Petition to Annex and proposed R-8 prezoning for the proposed Johnson Annexation; 18.24 acres located east of 142nd Ave. SE, south of SE 118th St., and west of 144th Ave. SE. Council concur. Airport: FAA Lease,Portion Transportation Systems Division recommended approval of a lease with the of Control Tower Federal Aviation Administration for a portion of the Airport control tower, extending the term of the original lease for another ten years. Revenue generated is $25,755 annually. Refer to Transportation(Aviation)Committee. CIlif OF RENTON COUNCIL AGENDA ilirn AI#: .7 , . Submitting Data: For Agenda of: April 5, 2004 Dept/Div/Board.. Economic Development, Neighborhoods and Strategic Planning Staff Contact Rebecca Lind Agenda Status Consent Subject: Public Hearing.. Correspondence.. Ratification of the 2003 Amendments to the Ordinance Countywide Planning Policies Resolution X Old Business Exhibits: New Business Issue Paper Study Sessions King County Correspondence, Information Signature Report March 8, 2004 King County Staff Report Resolution Recommended Action: Approvals: Council Concur. Legal Dept...x Finance Dept Other Fiscal Impact: NA Expenditure Required... Transfer/Amendment Amount Budgeted Revenue Generated Total Project Budget City Share Total Project.. SUMMARY OF ACTION: The City of Auburn requested recognition of downtown Auburn as an Urban Center as defined in the Countywide Planning Policies (CPPs). This request was approved by the Growth Management Planning Council September 17, 2003, and was ratified by the Metropolitan King County Council on behalf of unincorporated King County on March 8, 2004. Amendments to the CPPs must be ratified by at least 30 percent of the city and country governments representing 70 percent of the population of King County. A city will be deemed to have ratified the amendments unless within 90 days of adoption by King County, the city takes legislative action to disapprove the amendments. The City of Auburn is requesting support of this amendment prior to the 90 day deadline in order to meet an April 1st Puget Sound Regional Council timeline. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Adopt a Resolution supporting GMPC Motion 03-2 amending the Countywide Planning Policies by designating downtown Auburn as an Urban Center. Regional CPPs03Amendmentauburn Urban Center doc *me Nue CITY OF RENTON ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT, NEIGHBORHOODS, AND STRATEGIC PLANNING MEMORAN D U M DATE: March 29, 2004 TO: Don Persson, Council President Members of the Renton City Council VIA: . Mayor Kathy Keolker-Wheeler FROM: Alex Pietsch, Administrator M A' STAFF CONTACT: Rebecca Lind(ext. 6588) SUBJECT: Ratification of 2003 Amendment to the Countywide Planning Policies ISSUE: Ratification of the Growth Management Planning Council(GMPC)proposed amendment to the Countywide Planning Policies(CPPs)adding downtown Auburn as an urban center. RECOMMENDATION: Adopt a resolution ratifying the amendment. BACKGROUND SUMMARY: The CPPs are intended to provide a policy framework for all jursidictions'comprehensive plans in order to provide the regional planning and coordination among local governments required by the Growth Management Act. The CPPs set forth guidance for the location of growth and infrastructure investment in the region and establish specific employment and housing targets for each jurisdiction. Jurisdictions must adopt land use and zoning to accommodate these targets in their respective plans and development regulations. The GMPC approved this amendment Sept. 17, 2003,and Metropolitan King County Council ratified it on March 8,2004. Renton monitored the GMPC review throughout the process.The proposed amendment does not affect the City.To become effective, amendments must be ratified by at least 30 percent of the city and county governments representing 70 percent of the population of King County. The deadline for responding is June 7, 2004. CONCLUSION The City of Auburn requested Renton's support in achieving early ratification of this amendment. While it is not necessary to take a formal action, the passage of a resolution puts Renton on the record as supporting the amendments and it provides to way to track Renton's position in the future. *re 'tare King County March 18, 2004 The Honorable Kathy Keolker-Wheeler City of Renton 1055 South Grady Way Renton, WA 98055 Dear M 4 % . -r-Wheeler: We are pleased to f I rward for your consideration and ratification the enclosed amendment t. the ing County Countywide Planning Policies (CPP). On March 8, 2004, the King County Council approved and ratified an amendment on behalf of unincorporated King County. Copies of the King County Council staff reports, ordinance and Growth Management Planning Council motion are enclosed to assist you in your review of these amendments. • Ordinance No. 14844, GMPC Motion No. 03-2, amending the Countywide Planning Policies by designating Downtown Auburn (the Auburn Central Business District) as an Urban Center. Downtown Auburn is added to the list of Urban Centers following Countywide Planning Policy LU-39. In accordance with the Countywide Planning Policies, FW-1, Step 9, amendments become effective when ratified by ordinance or resolution by at least 30 percent of the city and county governments representing 70 percent of the population of King County according to the interlocal agreement. A city will be deemed to have ratified the amendments to the County wide Planning Policies unless, within 90 days of adoption by King County, the city takes legislative action to disapprove the amendments. Please note that the 90-day deadline for this amendment is June 7, 2004. If you have any questions about the amendments or ratification process, please contact Paul Reitenbach, Senior Policy Analyst, King County Department of Development and Environmental Services, at 206-296-6705, or Lauren Smith, Legislative Analyst, King County Council, at 206-296-0352. f If you adopt any legislation relative to this action, please send a copy of the legislation by the close of business, June 7, 2004, to Anne Noris, Clerk of the Council,W1025 King County Courthouse, 516 Third Avenue, Seattle, WA 98104. Thank you for your prompt attention to this matter. Sine erely if it Phillips I it 1/, Ron ims .King CountylFuncil King County Executive Enclosures cc: King County City Planning Directors Suburban Cities Association Stephanie Warden, Director, Department of Development and Environmental Services (DDES) Paul Reitenbach, Senior Policy Analyst, DDES Megan Smith, Lead Staff, Growth Management & Unincorporated Areas _Committee (GMUAC) Lauren Smith, Legislative Analyst, GMUAC KING COUNTY 1200 King County Courthouse * • 516 Third Avenue Seattle,WA 98104 Signature Report March 8, 2004 Ordinance 14844 Proposed No. 2004-0033.2 Sponsors Patterson and Hammond 1 AN ORDINANCE adopting amendments to the 2 Countywide Planning Policies; designating downtown 3 Auburn as an Urban Center;ratifying the amended 4 Countywide Planning Policies for unincorporated King 5 County; and amending Ordinance 10450, Section 3,as 6 amended,and K.C.C.20.10.030 and Ordinance 10450, 7 Section 4, as amended, and K.C.C.20.10.040. 8 9 10 BE IT ORDAINED BY THE COUNCIL OF KING COUNTY: 11 SECTION 1. Findings. The council makes the following findings: 12 A. The metropolitan King County council adopted and ratified the Growth 13 Management Planning Council recommended King County 2012-Countywide Planning 14 Policies(Phase I)in July 1992,under Ordinance 10450. 15 B. The metropolitan King County council adopted and ratified the Phase II 16 amendments to the Countywide.Planning Policies on August 15, 1994,under Ordinance . 17 11446. 1 Ordinance 14844 18 C. The Growth Management Planning Council met on September 17, 2003;and 19 voted to recommend amendments to the King County 2012- Countywide Planning 20 Policies, designating downtown Auburn as an Urban Center. 21 SECTION 2. Ordinance 10450, Section 3, as amended, and K.C.C. 20.10.030 are 22 each hereby amended to read as follows: 23 Phase II. 24 A. The Phase II Amendments to the King County 2012 Countywide Planning 25 Policies attached to Ordinance 11446 are hereby approved and adopted. 26 B. The Phase II Amendments to the King County 2012- Countywide Planning 27 Policies are amended, as shown by Attachment 1 to Ordinance 12027. 28 C. The Phase II Amendments to the King County 2012 - Countywide Planning 29 Policies are amended, as shown by Attachment 1 to Ordinance 12421. 30 D. The Phase II Amendments to the King County 2012- Countywide Planning 31 Policies are amended, as shown by Attachments 1 and 2 to Ordinance 13260. 32 E. The Phase II Amendments to the King County 2012- Countywide Planning 33 Policies are amended,as shown by Attachments 1 through 4 to Ordinance 13415. 34 F. The Phase II Amendments to the King County 2012 -Countywide Planning 35 Policies are amended, as shown by Attachments 1 through 3 to Ordinance 13858. 36 G. The Phase II Amendments to the King County 2012-Countywide Planning 37 Policies are amended, as shown by Attachment 1 to Ordinance 14390. 38 H. The Phase II Amendments to the King County 2012—Countywide Planning 39 Policies are amended, as shown by Attachment 1 to Ordinance 14391. 2 Ordinance 14844 40 I. The Phase II Amendments to the King County 2012—Countywide Planning 41 Policies are amended, as shown by Attachment 1 to Ordinance 14392. 42 J. The Phase II Amendments to the King County 2012-Countywide Planning 43 Policies are amended, as shown by Attachment 1 to Ordinance 14652. 44 K. The Phase II Amendments to the King County 2012 -Countywide Planning 45 Policies are amended,as shown by Attachments 1 through 3 to Ordinance 14653. 46 L. The Phase II Amendments to the King County 2012-Countywide Planning 47 Policies are amended,as shown by Attachment 1 to Ordinance 14654. 48 M. The Phase II Amendments to the King County 2012-Countywide Planning 49 Policies are amended,as shown by Attachment 1 to Ordinance 14655. 50 N. The Phase II Amendments to the King County 2012-Countywide Planning 51 Policies are amended, as shown by Attachments 1 and 2 to Ordinance 14656. 52 O. The Phase II Amendments to the King County 2012-Countywide Planning 53 Policies are amended,as shown by Attachment A to this ordinance. 54 SECTION 3. Ordinance 10450, Section 4, as amended,and K.C.C. 20.10.040 are 55 each hereby amended to read as follows: 56 Ratification for unincorporated King County. 57 A. Countywide Planning Policies adopted by Ordinance 10450 for the purposes 58 specified are hereby ratified on behalf of the population of unincorporated King County. 59 B. The amendments to the Countywide Planning Policies adopted by Ordinance 60 10840 are hereby ratified on behalf of the population of unincorporated King County. 61 C. The amendments to the Countywide Planning Policies adopted'by Ordinance 62 11061 are hereby ratified on behalf of the population of unincorporated King County. 3 Ordinance 14844 63 D. The Phase II amendments to the King County 2012 Countywide Planning 64 Policies adopted by Ordinance 11446 are hereby ratified on behalf of the population of 65 unincorporated King County. 66 E. The amendments to the King County 2012 -Countywide Planning Policies, as 67 shown by Attachment 1 to Ordinance 12027 are hereby ratified on behalf of the 68 population of unincorporated King County. 69 F. The amendments to the King County 2012 Countywide Planning.Policies, as 70 shown by Attachment 1 to Ordinance 12421, are hereby ratified on behalf of the 71 population of unincorporated King County. 72 G. The amendments to the King County 2012 -Countywide Planning Policies, as 73 shown by Attachments 1 and 2 to Ordinance 13260, are hereby ratified on behalf of the 74 population of unincorporated King County. 75 II. The amendments to the King County 2012 Countywide Planning Policies, as 76 shown by Attachment 1 through 4 to Ordinance 13415,are hereby ratified on behalf of 77 the population of unincorporated King County. 78 I. The amendments to the King County 2012 - Countywide Planning Policies, as 79 shown by Attachments 1 through 3 to Ordinance 13858,are hereby ratified on behalf of 80 the population of unincorporated King County. 81 J. The amendments to the King County 2012 Countywide Planning Policies,as 82 shown by Attachment 1 to Ordinance 14390,are hereby ratified on behalf of the 83 population of unincorporated King County. 4 Ordinance 14844 84 K. The amendments to the King County 2012- Countywide Planning Policies, as 85 shown by Attachment 1 to Ordinance 14391, are hereby ratified on behalf of the 86 population of unincorporated King County. 87 L. The amendments to the King County 2012- Countywide Planning Policies, as 88 shown by Attachment I to Ordinance 14392,are hereby ratified on behalf of the 89 population of unincorporated King County. 90 M. The amendments to the King County 2012- Countywide Planning Policies, as 91 shown by Attachment 1 to Ordinance 14652, are hereby ratified on behalf of the 92 population of unincorporated King County. 93 N. The amendments to the King County 2012-Countywide Planning Policies, as 94 shown by Attachments 1 through 3 to Ordinance 14653, are hereby ratified on behalf of 95 the population of unincorporated King County. 96 O. The amendments to the King County 2012 -Countywide Planning Policies, as 97 shown by Attachment 1 to Ordinance 14654, are hereby ratified on behalf of the 98 population of unincorporated King County. 99 P. The amendments to the King County 2012-Countywide Planning Policies, as 100 shown by Attachment 1 to Ordinance 14655,are hereby ratified on behalf of the 101 population of unincorporated King County. 102 Q. The amendments to theXing County 2012-Countywide Planning Policies, as 103 shown by Attachments I and 2 to Ordinance 14656, are hereby ratified on behalf of the 104 population of unincorporated King County. 5 NINO Ordinance 14844 105 R. The amendments to the King.County 2012-Countywide Planning Policies, as 106 shown by Attachment A to this ordinance, are hereby ratified on behalf of the population 107 of unincorporated King County. 108 Ordinance 14844 was introduced on 1/20/2004 and passed by the Metropolitan King County Council on 3/8/2004,by the following vote: Yes: 12 -Mr.Phillips,Ms. Edmonds,Mr.von Reichbauer,Ms. Lambert,Mr. McKenna,Mr. Ferguson,Mr.Hammond,Mr. Gossett,Ms.Hague,Mr. Irons, Ms. Patterson and Mr.Constantine. No: 0 Excused: 1 -Mr.Pelz KING COUNTY COUNCIL KING COUNTY,WASHINGTON Larry Phil'' ,Chaim ATTEST: 6,),,k.u&e? Anne Noris,Clerk of the Council aLtteaL APPROVED this (1 day of , ,2004. Ron Sims,County Executive o z .sue o rn tea-' t 0 -WTI co rn Attachments A.GMPC Motion No.03-2 -0 < CD In rtz 6 .4use 14844 _Attachment A September 17,2003 Sponsored By: Executive Committee 1 MOTION NO: 03-2 2 A MOTION to amend the Countywide Planning Policies by 3 designating Downtown Auburn (the Auburn Central Business 4 District) as an Urban Center. Downtown Auburn is added to 5 the list of Urban Centers following Countywide Planning 6 Policy LU-39. 7 8 9 WHEREAS,A goal of the Growth Management Act is to encourage development in Urban 10 Areas where adequate public facilities exist or can be provided in an efficient manner; 11 12 WHEREAS,Policy LU-39 of the Countywide Planning Policies of King County describes 13 the criteria for Urban Center designation; 14 15 WHEREAS,Policy LU-40 of the Countywide Planning Policies of King County describes 16 standards for planned land uses within Urban.Centers; 17 18 WHEREAS, the City of Auburn has demonstrated that Downtown Auburn meets the 19 criteria for designation as an Urban Center; and 20 21 WHEREAS, King County Comprehensive Plan Policy U-106-supports the development of. 22 Urban Centers to meet the region's needs for housing, jobs, services, culture and 23 recreation. 24 • 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 N 14844 -Attachment A 1 2 3 4 THE GROWTH MANAGEMENT PLANNING COUNCIL OF KING COUNTY 5 HEREBY MOVES AS FOLLOWS: 6 7 Downtown Auburn is designated as an Urban Center. The list of Urban Centers following 8 Countywide Planning Policy LU-39 is modified to include Downtown Auburn. 9 10 ADOYIED by the Growth Management Planning Council of King County on 11 September 17, 2003 in open session. 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 Ron Sims,Chair, Growth Management Planning Council • Metropolitan King County Council • Growth Management and Unincorporated Areas Committee Revised Staff Report Agenda Item: Name: Lauren Smith Proposed Ordinance: 2004-0033 Date: • SUBJECT: The Growth Management Planning Council recommends amending the Countywide Planning Policies by designating downtown Auburn as an Urban Center. Proposed Ordinance 2004-0033 would adopt this amendment, and ratify the amended Countywide Planning Policies on behalf of unincorporated King County. BACKGROUND: The Growth Management Planning Council and Countywide Planning Policies The Growth Management Planning Council (GMPC) is a formal body comprised of elected officials from King County, Seattle, Bellevue, the Suburban Cities, and Special Districts. The GMPC was created in 1990 in response to a provision in the Washington State Growth Management Act(GMA) requiring cities and counties to work together to adopt Countywide Planning Policies(CPPs). Under GMA,'countywide planning policies serve as the framework for each individual jurisdiction's comprehensive plan, and ensure countywide consistency with respect to land use planning efforts. The GMPC drafted the CPPs,which were then adopted by.the King County Council and ratified by the cities. Subsequent amendments to the CPPs are recommended by the GMPC, adopted by the King County Council, and ratified by the cities. They become effective when ratified by ordinance or ' resolution by at least 30%of the city and county governments representing 70% of the population of King County. A city shall be deemed to have-ratified an amendment to the countywide planning policies unless, within 90 days of adoption by King County, the city by legislative action disapproves it. The City of-Auburn's Request to become an Urban Center In 2003, the City of Auburn requested that its downtown core be designated as an Urban Center in the Countywide Planning Policies. Urban Centers are envisioned in the CPPs as areas of concentrated employment and housing,;with direct service by high-capacity transit, and a wide range of other land uses. They are expected to account for up to one half of King County's employment growth and one quarter of household growth over the next 20 years. Designating Auburn's central business district as an Urban Center would involve amending Countywide Planning Policy LU-39 to add it to the list of existing Urban Centers, which currently includes: a Bellevue Kirkland Seattle (5) Kent . Redmond (2) . Tukwila Federal Way + Renton C:VJOCt1ME-1lpedrozmelLOCALS-11TempVegitemp12844.doc 2/27/2004 3.33 PM Urban Center Requirements In order to be designated as an Urban Center,jurisdictions must meet specific criteria in the Countywide Planning Policies, including having planned land uses to accommodate: • A minimum of 15,000 jobs within one-half mile of a transit center; • At a minimum, an average of 50 employees per gross acre; and • At a minimum, an average of 15 households per acre. In addition to these requirements, Policy LU-40 states that fully realized Urban Centers shall be characterized by the following: :• Clearly defined geographic boundaries; • An intensity/density of land uses sufficient to support effective and rapid transit; :• Pedestrian emphasis within the Center; • Emphasis on superior urban design which reflects the local community; • Limitations on single-occupancy vehicle usage during peak commute hours; + A broad array of land uses and choices withinthose land uses for employees and residents; Sufficient public open spaces and recreational opportunities; and • Uses which provide both daytime and nighttime activities in the Center. City of Auburn's Existing and Planned Conditions The existing conditions in Auburn's proposed Urban Center are as follows: • 6,000 jobs within one-half mile of a transit center; :• An average of 14 employees per gross acre; and • An average of less than 1 household per acre. The Countywide Planning Policies recognize that Urban Centers vary substantially in the number of households and jobs they contain at the time of their initial designation, and thus the decision to designate an Urban Center is based on planned, not existing, densities. A jurisdiction shows its commitment to realizing these densities through its comprehensive plan policies, a supportive regulatory environment and a commitment to provide adequate infrastructure. GMPC Recommendation The GMPC, through the unanimous adoption of Motion 03-2, has declared that the City of Auburn has demonstrated its commitment to developing a fully realized Urban Center as envisioned in the Countywide Planning Policies. Specific findings include: • The city has completed the necessary planning to support an Urban Center designation, including the adoption of a new downtown plan in 2001. • Auburn's new downtown plan supports increased transit-oriented development, pedestrian amenities and strong urban design, and a commitment to eliminating automobile oriented uses in the downtown area. • Auburn is the site of a major transit hub, which is the centerpiece of approximately$67 million in public works investments in the downtown core. • Recent zoning code amendments include the removal of building height limitations in the Urban Center, and reduced parking requirements for uses close to the transit center. C3DOCUME-11pedrozme\LOCALS-1\Temo\egitemp12844.doc 2/27/2004 3:33 PM Other comprehensive plan policies are in place to support transit use, pedestrian access, economic development, and urban design standards. SUMMARY: Proposed Ordinance 2004-0033 would amend the Countywide Planning Policies by: :• Adding downtown Auburri to the list of Urban Centers in Policy LU-39 Additionally, the ordinance would ratify the change on behalf of the population of unincorporated King County, as required by Countywide Planning Policy FW-1, Step 9. C:IOOCUME-11pedrozmelLOCALS-1\Templlegitemp12844.doc 2/27/2004 3:33 PM fir' Nue CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON, RATIFYING AMENDMENTS TO THE COUNTYWIDE PLANNING POLICIES. WHEREAS, the Growth Management Act, RCW 36.70A.210, mandates the development and adoption of Countywide Planning Policies for King County;and WHEREAS, King County, the City of Seattle, the City of Bellevue and the Suburban Cities of King County have met jointly as the Growth Management Planning Council(GMPC)to develop and recommend Countywide Planning Policies;and WHEREAS,the City of Renton has ratified the Countywide Planning Policies and subsequent amendments;and WHEREAS, Countywide Planning Policy FW-1 Step 9 provides for an amendment process to change the Planning Policies as may be necessary from time to time; and WHEREAS, on March 8, 2004, the Metropolitan King County Council took action ratifying the proposed amendment to the King County Countywide Planning Policies designating Downtown Auburn as an urban center on behalf of unincorporated King County;and WHEREAS, the amendment process requires ratification of proposed amendments by at least 30 percent of the City and County governments representing 70 percent of the population in King County; NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON, DO RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS: 1 Nipie Now RESOLUTION NO. SECTION I. The above findings are true and correct in all respects. SECTION II. The proposed amendments to the Countywide Planning Policies are consistent with the adopted City Comprehensive Plan and the adopted City Business Plan. SECTION III. The best interests and general welfare of the City of Renton would be served by ratification of Ordinance 14844 (GMPC Motion 03-2) designating downtown Auburn as an urban center as approved by the King County Council and the Growth Management Planning Council. PASSED BY THE CITY COUNCIL this day of , 2004. Bonnie I. Walton, City Clerk APPROVED BY THE MAYOR this day of , 2004. Kathy Keolker-Wheeler, Mayor Approved as to form: Lawrence J. Warren, City Attorney RES.1037:3/30/04:ma 2 CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON RESOLUTION NO. 3651 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON, RATIFYING AMENDMENTS TO THE COUNTYWIDE PLANNING POLICIES WHEREAS, the Growth Management Act, RCW 36.70A.210, mandates the development and adoption of Countywide Planning Policies for King County;and WHEREAS, the King County, the City of Seattle, the City of Bellevue and the Suburban Cities of King County have met jointly as the Growth Management Planning Council(GMPC)to develop and recommend Countywide Planning Policies;and WHEREAS,the City of Renton has ratified the Countywide Planning Policies and subsequent amendments; and WHEREAS, Countywide Planning Policy FW-1 Step 9 provides for an amendment process to change the Planning Policies as may be necessary from time to time;and WHEREAS, the amendment process requires ratification of proposed amendments by at least 30 percent of the City and County governments representing 70 percent of the population in King County;and WHEREAS,the City of Renton participated in study sessions with the GMPC and reviewed the final amendments prior to adoption by the GMPC;and WHEREAS, the Planning and Development Committee of the City Council reviewed the proposed amendments June 5th and September 12, 2002, and August 7, 2003, as they pertain to the Renton Comprehensive Plan, and recommended to the full Council that it adopt the proposed amendment; 1 RESOLUTION NO. 3651 NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON,DO RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS: SECTION I. The above findings are true and correct in all respects. SECTION II. The proposed amendments to the Countywide Planning Policies are consistent with the adopted City Comprehensive Plan and the adopted City Business Plan. SECTION III. The best interests and general welfare of the City of Renton would be served by ratification of the following amendments approved by the King County Council and the Growth Management Planning Council: a) Ordinance 2003-0123 (GMPC Motion 02-4) adding a new policy to support ongoing water supply planning; b) Ordinance 2003-0124 (GMPC Motions 02-1, 02-2 and 02-3) adopting new household and employment targets for the period 2001-2022; c) Ordinance 2003-0125 (GMPC Motion 02-5) amending the Urban Separator map to reflect negotiated modifications to the Renton Urban Separator; d) Ordinance 2003-0126 (GMPC Motion 02-6) designating Totem Lake as an Urban Center; and e) Ordinance 2003-0127 (GMPC Motion 01-2) addressing the long-term protection of Agricultural Production Districts, described in Exhibit "A" attached hereto and incorporated by reference as if fully set forth. 2 ` ' RESOLUTION NO. 3651 tiale PASSED BY THE CITY COUNCIL this 11 th day of August , 2003. Bonnie I. Walton, City Clerk APPROVED BY THE MAYOR this 11 t h day of August 2003. Jes anner,Mayor Approved to form: Lawrence J. Warren, City Attorney RES.999:8/1/03:ma 3 August 11,2003 slope Renton City Council Minutes Neue Page 286 Resolution#3651 A resolution was read ratifying the 2002 amendments to the Growth Planning: 2002 Countywide Management Planning Council's Countywide Planning Policies. MOVED BY Planning Policies Amendments BRIERE, SECONDED BY CLAWSON, COUNCIL ADOPT THE RESOLUTION AS READ. CARRIED. The following ordinance was presented for first reading and referred to the Council meeting of 8/18/2003 for second and final reading: Development Services: Street An ordinance was read amending Section 4-1-180.0 of Chapter 1, Light System Fee, City Code Administration and Enforcement,of Title IV(Development Regulations)of Amend City Code by adding a street light system fee. MOVED BY CLAWSON, SECONDED BY KEOLKER-WHEELER,COUNCIL REFER THE ORDINANCE FOR SECOND AND FINAL READING ON 8/18/2003. CARRIED. AUDIENCE COMMENT Bob Gevers,900 Kirkland Ave. NE,Renton, 98056, inquired as to why the Citizen Comment: Gevers - subject of the Highlands area redevelopment was not discussed this evening. Highlands Area Councilwoman Briere explained that the Planning and Development Committee Redevelopment discussed the issue during its meeting on August 4, and due to Mr. Gever's comments at last week's Council meeting, she decided to hold the item in Committee for further review. Citizen Comment: Mendenhall Shawn Mendenhall,City of Renton Firefighter and President of the Renton -Renton Firefighters Local Firefighters Local 864, stated that Fire Chief Lee Wheeler and Council 864,Mayor Election President Keolker-Wheeler have served the City well for 20 years, and the union sees no change if they change job titles. He pointed out that all City of Renton employees should serve the citizens of this City well;that is what the Fire Department does and that is what this team would do if Ms.Keolker- Wheeler is elected Mayor. Mayor Tanner noted that Mr.Mendenhall made a political speech even though he was cautioned from doing so. EXECUTIVE SESSION MOVED BY KEOLKER-WHEELER, SECONDED BY NELSON,COUNCIL AND ADJOURNMENT RECESS INTO EXECUTIVE SESSION FOR APPROXIMATELY 35 MINUTES TO DISCUSS PENDING AND CURRENT LITIGATION WITH NO OFFICIAL ACTION TO BE TAKEN AND THE COUNCIL MEETING BE ADJOURNED WHEN THE EXECUTIVE SESSION IS ADJOURNED. CARRIED. Time: 8:45 p.m. Executive session was conducted. There was no action taken. The executive session and the Council meeting adjourned at 9:22 p.m. BONNIE I.WALTON,City Clerk Recorder: Michele Neumann August 11,2003 '41111 August 11,2003 Ne✓ Renton City Council Minutes Page 285 Technical Services: King Utilities Committee Chair Corman presented a report regarding the request County Utility Easements, from King County for utility easements across the Airport and Cedar River Airport&Cedar River Trail Trail Park properties. The Committee recommended concurrence with the Park recommendation of the Planning/Building/Public Works Department to approve the utility easements request and authorize the Mayor and City Clerk to execute the utility easements by which Renton will formally grant utility easements in exchange for$262,830 from King County. MOVED BY CORMAN, SECONDED BY BRIERE,COUNCIL CONCUR IN THE COMMITTEE REPORT. CARRIED. Transportation(Aviation) Transportation(Aviation)Committee Chair Persson presented a report Committee regarding the Transit Signal Priority Project—procurement of the Advanced Transportation: Traffic Traffic Management System. The Committee recommended that Council Management Center Electronic authorize the purchase of system hardware(electronic equipment)and the Equipment,NetVersant system installation for the Traffic Management Center from NetVersant,under the State Department of Information Systems Contract, in the amount of $220,150.06 plus tax,bonds,and permits. MOVED BY PERSSON, SECONDED BY NELSON,COUNCIL CONCUR IN THE COMMITTEE REPORT. CARRIED. Finance Committee Finance Committee Chair Parker presented a report recommending approval of Finance: Vouchers Claim Vouchers 217811 -218202 and one wire transfer totaling$2,798,024.82; and approval of Payroll Vouchers 45621 -45959, one wire transfer and 573 direct deposits totaling$1,881,945.32. MOVED BY PARKER, SECONDED BY CORMAN,COUNCIL CONCUR IN THE COMMITTEE REPORT. CARRIED. Planning&Development Planning and Development Committee Chair Briere presented a report Committee regarding the ratification of the 2002 amendments to the Growth Management Planning: 2002 Countywide Planning Council's Countywide Planning Policies. The Committee met on Planning Policies Amendments August 7 to review the final form of the amendments to the Countywide Planning Policies approved by the Growth Management Planning Council during 2002. These amendments adopt new Growth Management Act mandated household and employment targets for King County and the cities within it, amend the Urban Separator Map, add a water supply policy,designate Totem Lake an Urban Center, and add policies addressing Agricultural Production Districts. The Committee found these amendments to be consistent with the Renton Comprehensive Plan and City Business Plan,and recommended that Council adopt a resolution ratifying the amendment package. MOVED BY BRIERE, SECONDED BY CLAWSON,COUNCIL CONCUR IN THE COMMITTEE REPORT. CARRIED. (See page 286 for resolution.) ORDINANCES AND , The following resolutions were presented for reading and adoption: RESOLUTIONS Resolution#3650 A resolution was read approving the Highpointe Division II Final Plat Plat: Highpointe Division II, consisting of approximately 3.67 acres located in the vicinity of NE 12th St., Redmond Ave NE,FP-03-059 Sunset Blvd. NE,and Redmond Ave. NE(FP-03-059). MOVED BY BRIERE, SECONDED BY CLAWSON, COUNCIL ADOPT THE RESOLUTION AS READ. CARRIED. AppnovED 3Y 1 CiTV COUNCIL PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT COMMITTEE Date 5-//_A003 COMMITTEE REPORT August 11,2003 Ratification of the Amendments to the 2002 Countywide Planning Policies (Referred August 4, 2003) The Planning and Development Committee met August 7th to review the final form of amendments to the Countywide Planning policies approved by the Growth Management Planning Council during 2002. These amendments adopt new GMA (Growth Management Act) mandated household and employment targets for the County and the cities within it, amend the Urban Separator Map, add a water supply policy, designate Totem Lake an Urban Center and add policies addressing Agricultural Production Districts. The Committee finds these amendments consistent with the Renton Comprehensive Plan and City Business Plan, and recommends that Council adopt a resolution ratifying the amendment package. VerrA4Cji Bri , Chair Dan Clawson Vice Chair King Par er, Member cc: Jay Covington Alex Pietsch Rebecca Lind GMPC-CountywidePlanningPolicies.rpt\ Rev 01/02 bh *August 4,2003 Renton City Council Minutes `w Page 271 CONSENT AGENDA Items on the consent agenda are adopted by one motion which follows the listing. At the request of Councilman Persson,item 9.e. was removed for separate consideration. Council Meeting Minutes of Approval of Council meeting minutes of July 21, 2003. Council concur. July 21, 2003 Appointment: Human Rights Mayor Tanner reappointed Vern Nichols, 194 Monterey Pl. NE,Renton, 98056, &Affairs Commission to the Human Rights and Affairs Commission for a two-year term expiring 9/19/2005. Council concur. Vacation: Whitworth Ave S & City Clerk reported receipt of$151,920 compensation paid by petitioner, as set Alley, St. Anthony's Parish, by Council on 6/23/2003, and recommended adoption of ordinances to finalize VAC-00-003 &VAC-03-001 the St. Anthony's Parish street vacations for portions of Whitworth Ave. S. and a portion of the alley running north and south between Whitworth and Morris Avenues S. and S. 3rd and 4th Streets(VAC-00-003 & VAC-03-001). Council concur. (See page 275 for ordinances.) CAG: 03-115,East Kennydale City Clerk reported bid opening on 7/29/2003 for CAG-03-115,East Kennydale Sanitary Sewer Infill &Water Sanitary Sewer Infill &Water Main Replacement Phase II; five bids;engineer's Main Replacement Phase II, estimate$1,285,696.13; and submitted staff recommendation to award the RCI Construction Group contract to low bidder, RCI Construction Group, in the amount of $1,310,562.37. Council concur. CAG: 03-002, Skate Park Community Services Department submitted CAG-03-002, Liberty Park Skate Revisions, TF Sahli Const Park Revisions; and requested approval of the project, authorization for final pay estimate in the amount of$5,918.72, commencement of 60-day lien period, and release of retained amount of$3,263.26 to T.F. Sahli Construction, contractor, if all required releases are obtained. Council concur. CAG: 02-148,Highlands Park Community Services Department submitted CAG-02-148,Highlands Park Irrigation, Mr Irrigation Irrigation; and requested approval of the project,authorization for final pay estimate in the amount of$6,116.16,commencement of 60-day lien period, and release of retained amount of$3,274.89 to Mr. Irrigation,contractor,if all required releases are obtained. Council concur. CAG: 02-177,Fire Station#12 Community Services Department recommended the following be approved: a Construction, Cost Increase $1,067,907.85 change order to the contract with E. Kent Halvorson, Inc., for construction of Fire Station#12 (CAG-02-177)for cost increases due to replacing the original contractor who was operating under an invalid contract; payment by E. Kent Halvorson to subcontractors for work done through March, 2003, totaling$87,257.52; and an additional appropriation of$884,131 to cover increased costs and an appropriation adjustment. Refer to Committee of the Whole. Development Services: Amrik Development Services Division recommended acceptance of dedication of Singh Short Plat ROW additional right-of-way for a six-foot strip of land along S. Tillicum St. to fulfill Dedication on S Tillicum St a requirement of the Amrik Singh Short Plat(SHP-03-027). Council concur. Planning: 2002 Countywide Economic Development,Neighborhoods and Strategic Planning Department Planning Policies Amendments recommended adoption of a resolution ratifying the 2002 amendments to the Growth Management Planning Council's Countywide Planning Policies. Refer to Planning and Development Committee. Finance: Signatures for Finance and Information Systems Department recommended approval of a Banking Transactions resolution updating signature authorities for depositories and electronic fund Now CITY OF RENTON COUNCIL AGENDA PrLL I AI#: 9'V • i Submitting Data: For Agenda of: Dept/Div/Board. Economic Development, August 4, 2003 Neighborhoods and Strategic Planning Staff Contact Rebecca Lind (ext. 6588) Agenda Status Consent X Subject: Public Hearing. Ratification of the Amendments to the 2002 Correspondence. Countywide Planning Policies Ordinance... Resolution.... Old Business Exhibits: New Business Issue Paper Study Sessions Attachments: King County staff reports, GMPC Information motions and County ordinances Resolution Recommended Action: Approvals: Refer to Planning and Development Committee Legal Dept...X Finance Dept Other Fiscal Impact: None Expenditure Required... Transfer/Amendment Amount Budgeted Revenue Generated Total Project Budget City Share Total Project. SUMMARY OF ACTION: Final ratification of the 2002 amendments to the Countywide Planning Policies is before the City for review. These amendments make the following changes: adopt new household and employment targets, amend the Urban Separator Map, add a water supply policy, designate Totem Lake an Urban Center, and add policies addressing Agricultural Production Districts. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Adopt a resolution ratifying the amendments. \\DAEDALUS\SYS2\SHARED\EDNSP\Regional Issues\GMPC\CPPs\2002Amends AGENDA BILL.doc CITY OF RENTON ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT, NEIGHBORHOODS, AND STRATEGIC PLANNING MEMORAN D U M DATE: July 28, 2003 TO: Kathy Keolker-Wheeler, Council President Members of the Renton City Council VIA: Mayor Jesse Tanner FROM: Alex Pietsch, Administrator STAFF CONTACT: Rebecca Lind (ext. 6588) SUBJECT: Ratification of 2002 Amendments to the Countywide Planning Policies ISSUE: Ratification of the Growth Management Planning Council's proposed amendments to the Countywide Planning Policies(CPPs). The amendments make the following changes in the CPPs. 1. Add a new policy to support water supply planning and development(Approved by GMPC Sept. 25,2002 and Metropolitan King County Council May 19,2003) 2. Adopt new household and employment targets for 2001 thorough 2022 and amend text defining the methodology used to determine targets(Approved by GMPC July 24,2002 and Metropolitan King County Council May 19,2003) 3. Amend the Urban Separator map for the Renton Urban Separator (Approved by GMPC Oct. 23,2002,and King County Council May 19, 2003). 4. Designate Totem Lake as an Urban Center(Approved by GMPC Oct. 23,2002 and Metropolitan King County Council May 19,2003).This action does not effect Renton. 5. Add new policies addressing Agricultural Production Districts outside of the urban growth area(Approved by GMPC Sept. 26,2001 and Metropolitan King County Council May 19, 2003). This action does not effect Renton. RECOMMENDATION: Adopt a resolution ratifying the amendments. Nuoy BACKGROUND SUMMARY: The CPPs are intended to provide a policy framework for all jursidictions'comprehensive plans in order to provide the regional planning and coordination among local governments required by the Growth Management Act. The CPPs set forth guidance for the location of growth and infrastructure investment in the region and establish specific employment and housing targets for each jurisdiction. Jurisdictions must adopt land use and zoning to accommodate these targets in their respective plans and development regulations. Amendments to the CPPs must be approved by the Growth Management Planning Council (GMPC)and the Metro King County Council and ratified by jurisdictions represented in the GMPC. The current group of amendments to the Countywide Planning Policies were approved by the GMPC and County Council after extensive staff analysis,public comment,and review by local elected officials. Renton participated in the GMPC review throughout the process and the proposed amendments that effect the City were referred to the Planning and Development Committee and presented to Council for action. This set of amendments will make the following changes that effect Renton: 1) Provide new policy language Policy FW-12c related to water supply planning and development. The policy reads as follows: "Ensuring sufficient water supply is essential to accommodate growth and conserve fish habitat. Due to the substantial lead-time required to develop water supply sources, infrastructure and management strategies, long—term water supply planning efforts in the Region must be ongoing." 2)Adopt new growth targets for Renton of 6,198 housing units and 27,597 jobs to be achieved by 2022. 3) Incorporate text into the CPPs to define the methodology used to evaluate and distribute regional jobs and housing targets divided by four sub-areas of King County: South County, Eastside,Seattle/Shoreline,and the Rural Area. 3) Adopt the mapping of a new urban separator within the Renton City limits and King County. An agreement between Renton and King County recognizes 118 acres of R-1 zoned land and wetland areas in the City as separator,in exchange for removing the Urban Separator designation from 76 acres located east of Talbot Rd. S. in Renton's Potential Annexation Area. CONCLUSION To become effective, the amendments must be ratified by at least 30 percent of the city and county governments representing 70 percent of the population of King County. The deadline for responding is August 19, 2003. Ratification can occur by default. While it is not necessary to take a formal action, the passage of a resolution puts Renton on the record as supporting the amendments and it provides to way to track Renton's position in the future. KING COUNTY 1200 King County Courthouse • 141 516 Third Avenue' Seattle,WA 98104 Signature Report May 19, 2003 • Ordinance 14652 Proposed No. 2003-0123.1 Sponsors Hague 1 ' AN ORDINANCE adopting amendments to the 2 Countywide Planning Policies;adding a new policy to 3 support ongoing water supply planning and development; 4 ratifying the amended Countywide Planning Policies for 5 unincorporated King County;and amending Ordinance 6 10450,Section 3,as amended,and K.C.C.20.10.030 and 7 Ordinance 10450,Section 4,as amended,and K.C.C. 8 20.10.040. 9 10 11 BE IT ORDAINED BY THE COUNCIL OF KING COUNTY: 12 SECTION 1. Findings. The council makes the following findings. • 13 A. The metropolitan King County council adopted and ratified the Growth • 14 Management Planning Council recommended King County 2012-Countywide Planning 15 Policies(Phase I)in July 1992,under Ordinance 10450. • • • Ordinance 14652 16 B. The metropolitan King County council adopted and ratified the Phase II 17 amendments to the Countywide Planning Policies on August 15, 1994,under Ordinance 18 11446. 19 C. The Growth Management Planning Council met on September 25,2002 and 20 voted to recommend amendments to the King County 2012-Countywide Planning 21 Policies, adding a new policy to support ongoing water supply planning and 22 development. 23 SECTION 2. Ordinance 10450,Section 3,as amended,and K.C.C. 20.10.030 are 24 each hereby amended to read as follows: 25 Phase II. 26 A. The Phase II Amendments to the King County 2012 Countywide Planning 27 Policies attached to Ordinance 11446 are hereby approved and adopted. 28 B. The Phase II Amendments to the King County 2012-Countywide Planning 29 Policies are amended,as shown by Attachment 1 to Ordinance 12027. 30 C. The Phase II Amendments to the King County 2012-Countywide Planning 31 Policies are amended, as shown by Attachment 1 to Ordinance 12421. • 32 D. The Phase II Amendments to the King County 2012-Countywide Planning 33 Policies are amended,as shown by Attachment 1 and 2 to Ordinance 13260. 34 E. The Phase II Amendments to the King County 2012-Countywide Planning 35 Policies are amended,'as shown by Attachment 1 through 4 to Ordinance 13415. 36 F. The Phase II Amendments to the King County 2012-Countywide Planning 37 Policies are amended,as shown by Attachments 1 through 3 to Ordinance.13858. • • Nov Ordinance 14652 38 G. The Phase II Amendments to the King County 2012—Countywide Planning 39 Policies are amended,as shown by Attachment 1 to Ordinance 14390. 40 H. .The Phase II Amendments to the King County 2012—Countywide Planning 41 Policies are amended,as shown by Attachment 1 to Ordinance 14391. 42 I. The Phase II Amendments to the King County 2012—Countywide Planning 43 Policies are amended,as shown by Attachment 1 to Ordinance 14392. 44 J. The Phase II Amendments to the King County 2012—Countywide Planning 45 Policies are amended,as shown by Attachment 1 to this ordinance. 46 SECTION 3. Ordinance 10450,Section 4,as amended,and K.C.C.20.10.040 are j 47 each hereby amended to read as follows: 48 Ratification for unincorporated King County. 49 A. Countywide Planning Policies adopted by Ordinance 10450 for the purposes 50 specified are hereby ratified on behalf of the population of unincorporated King County. 51 B. The amendments to the Countywide Planning Policies adopted by Ordinance 52 10840 are hereby ratified on behalf of the population of unincorporated King County. 53 C. The amendments to the Countywide Planning Policies adopted by Ordinance 54 11061 are hereby ratified on behalf of the population of unincorporated King County. 55 D. The Phase II amendments to the King County 2012 Countywide Planning • 56 Policies adopted by Ordinance 11446 are hereby ratified on behalf of the population of 57 unincorporated King County. 58. E. The amendments to the King County 2012-Countywide Planning Policies, as 59 shown by Attachment Ito Ordinance 12027 are hereby ratified on behalf of the 60 population of unincorporated King County. 3 Ordinance 14652 61 F. The amendments to the King County 2012-Countywide Planning Policies,as 62 shown by Attachment 1 to Ordinance 12421,.are hereby ratified on behalf of the 63 population of unincorporated King County. 64 G. The amendments to the King County 2012-Countywide Planning Policies,as 65 shown by Attachments 1 and 2 to Ordinance 13260,are hereby ratified on behalf of the 66 population of unincorporated King County. 67 H. The amendments to the King County 2012-Countywide Planning Policies,as 68 shown by Attachment 1 through 4 to Ordinance 13415,are hereby ratified on behalf of 69 the population of unincorporated King County. 70 I. The amendments to the King County 2012-Countywide Planning Policies,as 71 shown by Attachments 1 through 3 to Ordinance 13858,are hereby ratified on behalf of 72 the population of unincorporated King County. 73 J. The amendments to the King County 2012-Countywide Planning Policies,as 74 shown by Attachment 1 to Ordinance 14390,are hereby ratified on behalf of the 75 population of unincorporated King County. 76 K. The amendments to the King County 2012-Countywide Planning Policies,as 77 shown by Attachment 1 to Ordinance 14391,are hereby ratified on behalf of the 78 population of unincorporated King County. 79 L. The amendments to the King County 2012-Countywide Planning Policies,as 80 shown by Attachment 1 to Ordinance 14392,are hereby ratified on behalf of the I • 81 population of unincorporated King County. • 4 Nov • Ordinance 14652 • • 82 M. The amendments to the King County 2012-Countywide Planning Policies,as 83 shown by Attachment 1 to this ordinance,are hereby ratified on behalf of the population 84 of unincorporated King County. • 85 • Ordinance 14652 was introduced on 3/17/2003 and passed by the Metropolitan King County Council on 5/19/2003,by the following vote: Yes: 12-Ms.Sullivan,Ms.Edmonds,Mr.von Reichbauer,Ms.Lambert,Mr. Phillips,Mr.Pelz,Mr.McKenna,Mr.Constantine,Mr.Gossett,Ms.Hague, Mr.Irons and Ms.Patterson No:0 • Excused:0 KING COUNTY COUNCIL KING COUNTY,WASHINGTON ynthia Sullivan,Chair ATTEST: r* "A O i rtl. Anne Noris,Clerk of the Council _ �- APPROVED this,5Q' day of rill ,2003. • ,unty Ex Attachments . Attachment 1.GMPC Motion 02-4 5 Attachment 1 - 2003-0123 • 14652 September 25,2002 Sponsored By: Executive Committee /cm • 1 MOTION NO. 02-4 2 A MOTION by the Growth Management Planning Council of King • 3 County recommending the amendment of the Countywide Planning • 4 Policies adding a new policy to support ongoing water supply 5 planning and development. 6 7 WHEREAS,in July 2002,the Growth Management Planning Council approved additions 8 and changes to the 1994 Countywide Planning Policies approving the countywide process 9 developed to recommend a new 22-year household and employment target;and 10 11 WHEREAS,an amendment to add a new policy supporting ongoing water supply planning 12 and development was considered and tabled;and • 13 14 WHEREAS,the GMPC allowed reconsideration of the amendment at such time agreement 15 • could be reached on the language;and • 16 • 17 WHEREAS,it is in the interest of the county to encourage regional efforts to plan for and 18 develop sufficient water supply sources to accommodate population growth and to meet 19 environmental needs related to conservation of fish habitat. 20 21 THE GROWTH MANAGEMENT PLANNING COUNCIL OF KING COUNTY 22 HEREBY MOVES AS FOLLOWS: • 23 24 Add a new policy to Section III C of the King County Countywide Planning Policies as 25 follows: 26 FW-12c "Ensuring sufficient water supply is essential to accommodate growth and 27 conserve fish habitat. Due to the substantial lead-time required to develop water supply. 28 sources,infrastructure and management strategies,long-term water supply planning efforts 29 in the Region must be ongoing. 30 31 32 33 vari 1 14652 • 2 ADOPTED by the Growth Management Planning Council of King County on 3 September 25,2002 in open session. 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 - Ron Sims,Chair,Growth Management Planning Council • • • • • I/GMPC/02GMPC/Mo O2.4.doc — 2 — Amisimmisimow Now Metropolitan King County Council Growth Management and Unincorporated Areas Committee Staff Report Agenda Item: 6 Name: Lauren Smith Proposed Ordinance: 2003-0123 Date: March 18, 2003 Attending: Paul Reitenbach, King County DDES Kevin Wright, King County PAO SUBJECT: Proposed Ordinance 2003-0123 adopting amendments to the Countywide Planning Policies; adding a new policy to support ongoing water supply planning and development; ratifying the amended Countywide Planning Policies on behalf of the population of unincorporated King County. BACKGROUND: The Growth Management Planning Council (GMPC) is a formal body comprised of elected officials from King County, Seattle, Bellevue, the Suburban Cities, and Special Districts. The GMPC was created in 1990 in response to a provision in the Washington State Growth Management Act (GMA) requiring cities and counties to work together to adopt Countywide Planning Policies (CPPs). Under GMA, countywide planning policies serve as the framework for each individual jurisdiction's comprehensive plan, and ensure regional consistency with respect to land use planning efforts. The GMPC drafted the CPPs, which were then adopted by the King County Council and ratified by the cities. Changes to the CPPs are recommended by the GMPC, adopted by the King County Council, and ratified by the cities. GMPC Actions On September 25, 2002 the GMPC adopted Motion 02-4 recommending the adoption of a new policy(FW12c) related to water supply planning and development. The issue of regional water supply was raised during discussions related to the adoption of new household and employment targets for the region, and was offered in the spirit of ensuring ongoing infrastructure planning efforts. The proposed new policy is consistent with existing policy direction in the CPPs related to water supply planning (Policy CO-5). FW-12c Ensuring sufficient water supply is essential to accommodate growth and conserve fish habitat. Due to the substantial lead-time required to develop water supply sources, infrastructure and management strategies, long-term water supply planning efforts in the Region must be ongoing. SUMMARY: Proposed Ordinance 2003-0123 would amend the Countywide Planning Policies by: • Adding a new policy, FW-12c in support of an ongoing discussion related to long-term water supply planning. C:\WINDOWS\TEMP\2003-0123(CPP Amendments-Water Supply Ptanning)(3-18-03).doe 5/21/2003 8:50 AM Nam... Additionally, the ordinance would ratify this change on behalf of the population of unincorporated King County, as required by Countywide Planning Policy FW-1, Step 9. Amendments to the Countywide Planning Policies become effective when ratified by ordinance or resolution by at least 30% of the city and county governments representing 70% of the population of King County according to the Interlocal agreement. A city shall be deemed to have ratified the countywide planning policy unless, within 90 days of adoption by King County, the city by legislative action disapproves the Countywide Planning Policy. POLICY DIRECTION Countywide Planning Policies CO-5 Water supply shall be regionally coordinated to provide a reliable economic source of water and to provide mutual aid to and between all agecnies and purveyors. THe region should work toward a mechanism to address the long-term regional water demand needs of all agencies and water purveyors. ATTACHMENTS: 1. Proposed Ordinance 2003-0123,with attachments C:\WINDOWS1TEMP12003-0123(CPP Amendments•Water Supply Planningx3-18-03).doc 5/21/2003 8:50 AM 1011, • v KING COUNTY 1200King County Courthouse 516 Third Avenue • Seattle,WA 98104 Signature Report May 19, 2003 • Ordinance 14653 • Proposed No. 2003-0124.1 Sponsors Hague 1 AN ORDINANCE adopting amendments to the 2 Countywide Planning Policies;adopting new household 3 and employment targets for the period 2001 through 2022; • 4 revising existing policies and adding new policies in 5 support of the new targets;ratifying the amended 6 Countywide Planning Policies for unincorporated King- 7 County;and amending Ordinance 10450,Section 3,as 8 amended,and K.C.C.20.10.030 and Ordinance 10450, 9 Section 4, as amended,and K.C.C.20.10.040 10 11 12 BE IT ORDAINED BY TI1E COUNCIL OF KING COUNTY: 13 SECTION 1. Findings. The council makes the following findings. 14 A. The metropolitan King County council adopted and ratified the Growth • 15 Management Planning Council recommended King County 2012-Countywide Planning 16 Policies(Phase I)in July 1992,under Ordinance 10450. 1 Ordinance 14653 • 17 B. The metropolitan King County council adopted and ratified the Phase II 18 amendments to the Countywide Planning Policies on August 15, 1994,under Ordinance • 19 11446. 20 C. The Growth Management Planning Council met on July 24,2002 and voted to 21 recommend amendments to the King County 2012-Countywide Planning Policies, 22 revising existing policies and adding new policies to support extending household and 23 employment targets for the period 2001 through 2022. 24 D. The Growth Management Planning Council met on September 25,2002 and 25 voted to recommend amendments to the King County 2012-Countywide Planning 26 Policies,adopting new household and employment targets for the period 2001-2022. • 27 SECTION 2. Ordinance 10450,Section 3,as amended,and K.C.C.20.10.030 are 28 each hereby amended to read as follows: 29 Phase II. 30 A. The Phase II Amendments to the King County 2012 Countywide Planning 31 Policies attached to Ordinance 11446 are hereby approved and adopted. 32 B. The Phase II Amendments to the King County 2012-Countywide Planning 33 Policies are amended,as shown by Attachment 1 to Ordinance 12027. 34. C. The Phase II Amendments to the King County 2012-Countywide Planning 35 Policies are amended,as shown by Attachment 1 to Ordinance 12421. . 36 D. The Phase II Amendments to the King County 2012-Countywide Planning 37 Policies are amended,as shown by Attachment 1 and 2 to Ordinance 13260. • 38 E. The Phase II Amendments to the King County 2012-Countywide Planning 39 Policies are amended,as shown by Attachment 1 through 4 to Ordinance 13415. • Ordinance 14653 40 F. The Phase II Amendments to the King County 2012-Countywide Planning 41 Policies are amended,as shown by Attachments 1 through 3 to Ordinance 13858. 42 G. The Phase II Amendments to the King County 2012—Countywide Planning • 43 Policies are amended,as shown by Attachment 1 to Ordinance 14390. 44 H. The Phase II Amendments to the King County 2012—Countywide Planning 45 Policies are amended,as shown by Attachment Ito Ordinance 14391.. 46 I. The Phase II Amendments to the King County 2012-Countywide Planning 47 Policies are amended,as shown by Attachment 1 to Ordinance 14392. 48 J. The Phase II Amendments to the King County 2012—Countywide Planning 49 Policies are amended,as shown by Attachments 1 through 3 to this ordinance. 50 SECTION 3. Ordinance 10450,Section 4,as amended,and K.C.C.20.10.040 are 51 each hereby amended to read as follows: 52 Ratification for unincorporated King County. 53 A. Countywide Planning Policies adopted by Ordinance 10450 for the purposes 54 specified are hereby ratified on behalf of the population of unincorporated King County. 55' B. The amendments to the Countywide Planning Policies adopted by Ordinance 56 10840 are hereby ratified on behalf of the population of unincorporated King County. 57 C. The amendments to the Countywide Planning Policies adopted by Ordinance 58 11061 are hereby ratified on behalf of the population of unincorporated King County. 59 D. The Phase II amendments to the King County 2012 Countywide Planning • 60 Policies adopted by Ordinance 11446 are hereby ratified on behalf of the population of 61 unincorporated King County. • , • Ordinance 14653 • 62 E. The amendments to the King County 2012-Count ywide Planning Policies,as 63 shown by Attachment 1 to Ordinance 12027 are hereby ratified on behalf of the 64 population of unincorporated King County. 1 65 F. The amendments to the King County 2012-Countywide Planning Policies,as 66 shown by Attachment 1 to Ordinance 12421,are hereby ratified on behalf of the 67 population of unincorporated King County. 68 G. The amendments to the King County 2012-Countywide Planning Policies,as 69 shown by Attachments 1 and 2 to Ordinance 13260,.are hereby ratified on behalf of the 70 population of unincorporated King County. 71 H. The amendments to the King County 2012-Countywide Planning Policies,as 72 shown by Attachment 1 through 4 to Ordinance 13415,are hereby ratified on behalf of 73 the population of unincorporated King County. 74 I. The amendments to the King County 2012-Countywide PlanningPolicies,,as 75 shown by Attachments 1 through 3 to Ordinance 13858,are hereby ratified on behalf of 76 the population of unincorporated King County. 77 J. The amendments to the King County 2012-Countywide Planning Policies,as 78 shown by Attachment 1 to Ordinance 14390,are hereby ratified on behalf of the 79 population of unincorporated King County. 80 K. The amendments to the King County 2012-Countywide Planning Policies,as 81 shown by Attachment 1 to Ordinance 14391,are hereby ratified on behalf of the 82 population of unincorporated King County. • 4 Ordinance 14653 83 L. The amendments to the King County 2012-Countywide Planning Policies,as 84 shown by Attachment 1 to Ordinance 14392,are hereby ratified on behalf of the 85 population of unincorporated King County. 86 M. The amendments to the King County 2012-Countywide Planning Policies,as 87 shown by Attachments 1 through 3 to this ordinance are hereby ratified on behalf of the 88 population of unincorporated King County. 89 - Ordinance 14653 was introduced on 3/17/2003 and passed by the Metropolitan King County Council on 5/19/2003,by the following vote: Yes: 12-Ms. Sullivan,Ms.Edmonds,Mr.von Reichbauer,Ms.Lambert,Mr. Phillips,Mr.Pelz,Mr.McKenna,Mr.Constantine,Mr.Gossett,Ms.•Hague, Mr.Irons and Ms.Patterson No:0 _ Excused:0 KING COUNTY COUNCIL . KING COUNTY,WASHINGTON • .- N / .(1‘./1/1/00C ? 2 -", . thia Sullivan,Chair '"„ :"' iT ATTEST: . — o Fri 6VVVAM/W4 • .--:-- -.F.- 6 Anne Noris,Clerk of the Council APPROVED this day of CY1pi ,2003. Ron SSA unty Executive 4 Attachments 1.GMPC Motion 02-1,2.GMPC Motion 02-2,3.GMPC Motion 02-3 5 . Iasi lire • • 14653 . • Subareas Household HH Capacity MA HH Job Capacity PAA Job Target in PAA* Target lob Target • in MA Target South King County . Algona 298 Auburn . 5.928 _ 2.635 92. Black Diamond 1.099 • Baden • 1352 Covington 1.173 1 Moines 1.576 5 2 Federal Way 6188 3 754 1320 Kent 4.284 1.763 Milton 50 106 37 Maple Valley 300 Normandy Park 100 • Pacific 996 127 45 . Renton 6.198 5.622 L976 • • SeaTac a: 14 5 Tokwih 3.200 13 3 • • Unincorp King County 4,935 Total 42355 14.039 4935 • East Jane County • Beaux Arts Village Bellevue 19.117 184 178 1 11 1.751 603 584 i Clyde Hill 21 Hunts Point Issaquah .3.993 827 802 • Kenmore 2325 j Kirkland 5.480 770 747 Medina 31 Mercer Island 1.437 • Newcastle 863 1 1 • Redmond 9.083 402 390 ' • Samaoamish 3.84 • Woodinville 1.869 Yarrow Point 28 Uninoap rmg County 6,801 **4222 **4099 Total 47,645 7,009 6801 • Sea-Shore Lake Forest Park 538 • Seattle 51310 • Shoreline 2.651 ' Unutoorp King County*** 1,670 1,670 1,670 Total 56.369 L670 1.670 . Rural Cities Carnation 246 Duvall 1.037 Enumclaw 1.927 North Bend 636 Skykomish 20 Snogalmie 1,697 Total 5363 Kiur County Total 151932 *FAA:Potential Annexation Area in Unincorporated King County Urban Area;"Bear Creek UPD;**North 11ighliae • The Rural Mies'targets are for the current city knits and meal expansion area for each city.Thus the methodology • for adjusting target as annexations occur is not applicable to the meal cities. I 2 1JGMPG02GMPCJMot02-2.doc — . 3 - 'rimer voi, . , 14653 Household HH Capacity PAA HH Job Capacity PAA Job Subareas Target in PAA* Target Job Target in PAA' Target . South King Cowrie Algona - 108 Auburn 6,079 252 252 • Black Diamond 2325 Burien 1.712 Covineton 900 . • Des Moines 1.695 . Federal Way 7 481 134 134 Kent 11.500 44 44 Milton 1.054 Maple Valley _ 104 • NormaaslyPark 67 _ Pacific 108 ' Renton 27597 458 458 SeaTac 9.288 496 496 Tukwila 16.000 497 497 Unincorp King County 2,582 701 701 Total 89.500 2582 2.582 East King County _ Beaux Arts Village - Bellevue 40.000 27 27 Bothell _ 2.000 174 174 Clyde Hill - - Hants Point - Issaquah 14,000 1 1 • Kenmore 2.800 Kirkland 8.00 221 221 Medina • - . Mercer Island 800 Newcastle 500 Redmond 21.760 21 21 Sammannsh 1.230 Woodinville 2.000 Yarrow Point { Uoincorp King County 4,637 •'4193 444193 Total 98.527 4,637 4,637 Sea-Short Lake Forest Park 455 Seattle 92,083 Shoreline 2,618 • Unincorp King may*** 694 1,544 694 Total _ _ 95.850 1544 694 Rural Cities . Carnation 75 Duvall 1.125 JEnumdaw 1.125 North Bend 1,125 Skykomish - j Snoqualmie 1,800 - i Total 5,250 Kina County Total 289127 *FAA:Potential Annexation Area in Unincorporated King County Urban Area;`Bear(]eck UPD;•niesho h li'igbiine The Rural Cities'targets are for the canent city limits and rural expansion area for each cry.Thus me mabodalogy for adjusting targets as annexations occur is not applicable to the rural cities. 1 IIGMPC102GMPC/Mot02-3.doc — 3 - • ' Attachment 1 • 2003-0124 14653 July 24,2002 . Sponsored By: Executive Committee 1 /cm 1 MOTION NO. 02-1 2 A MOTION by the Growth Management Planning Council of King 3 County recommending the amendment of the Countywide Planning 4 Policies revising existing policies and adding new policies to support 5 the extension of the household and employment targets for the period 6 2001-2022. 7 8 WHEREAS,in accordance with the Growth Management Act(GMA),the 1994 9 Countywide Planning Policies established a household and employment target range for 10 each city and for King County through 2012;and 11 12 WHEREAS,the 1994 targets need to be extended to reflect projected growth through 2022 13 in accordance with the GMA(RCW 36 70A 110);and 14 • 15 WHEREAS,Countywide Planning Policy FW-3 states that the adopted household and 16 employment targets shall be monitored by King County annually with adjustments made 17 by the Growth Management Planning Council utilizing the process established in FW-1, • 18 Step 6;and 19 20 WHEREAS since February 2001 staff from King County and the cities in King County 21 have worked cooperatively to analyze and recommend new 20-year household and 22 employment targets;and 23 24 WHEREAS the Growth Management Planning Council met and discussed the extension of 25 the household and employment targets for the period 2001-2022,with opportunity for • 26 public comment on March 28,2001,July 25,2001,October 24,2001 and May 22,2002. • 27 THE GROWTH MANAGEMENT PLANNING COUNCIL OF KING COUNTY 28 HEREBY MOVES AS FOLLOWS: 29 30 Amend Sections III.C and III..F of the King County Countywide Planning Policies'as 31 follows: • 32 33 Ili. Land Use Pattern 34 35 C. Urban Areas 36 marrataisitiossar • 400 14653 1 The following policies establish an Urban Growth Area(UGA), determine the amount of 2 household and employment growth to be accommodated within the UGA in the form of 3 targets for each jurisdiction, and identify methods to phase development within this area in • 4 order to bring certainty to long-term planning and development within the County. All 5 cities are included in the UGA, with the cities in the Rural Area identified as islands of 6 urban growth. The(Urban-Growth-Area) UGA is a permanent designation. Land outside 7 the( ) UGA is designated for permanent rural and resource uses.((, 8 )) Countywide Policies on Rural and Resource Areas 9 are found in Chapter IIIA,Resource Lands, and Chapter IIIB, Rural Areas. 10 11 In accordance with the State Growth Management Act(GMA)(36.70A.110). the State 12 Office of Financial Management(OFM)provides a population projection to each county. 13 The county. through a collaborative intergovernmental process established by the Growth 14 Management Planning Council, allocates the population as growth targets to individual 15 jurisdictions. Forecasts prepared by the Puget Sound Regional Council are used to 16 . establish the employment projection. 17 18 The process for allocating targets in King County is as follows: 19 20 1. The PSRC employment forecasts are calculated for the four geographic subareas of 21 the UGA(Sea-Shore, South.East, and Rural Cities). These then become subarea 22 employment targets_ 23 2. The jurisdictions collectively allocate the OFM population projection to the four 24 subarea's based on the projected employment for each area. A small amount of 25 growth is assumed to occur in the Rural area. 26 3. .The technical staff translates the population projections into projected households. 27 taking into account different average household sizes within each.subarea. These 28 projections then become subarea household targets. 29 4. Jurisdictions within each subarea negotiate the distribution of subarea household 30 and employment targets using criteria based on Countywide Planning Policies. 31 32 The housing capacity in the(( )) UGA((-growth)), based on adopted 33 plans and regulations, ((meets-the))should accommodate the projected.20-year 34• growth(( 35 populationforeeasts)). (( ))Growth is to be accommodated within 36 permanent Urban Areas by increasing densities,as needed Phasing((is-to))should occur 37 within the(( )) UGA, as necessary,to ensure that services are provided 38 as growth occurs. (( 39 •)) 40 FW-11 The land use pattern for King County shall protect the natural 41 environment by reducing the consumption of land and concentrating 42 development. An.Urban Growth Area, Rural Areas, and resource lands 43 shall be designated and the necessary implementing regulations 44 adopted. This includes Countywide establishment of a boundary for the 45 . Urban Growth Area. Local jurisdictions shall make land use decisions 46 . based on the Countywide Planning Policies. 47 UGMPC/o2GMPC/Mom2-1.doc — 2 — . Name vile . 14653 1 FW-12 The Urban Growth Area shall provide enough land to accommodate 2 future urban development. Policies to phase the provision of urban 3 services and to ensure efficient use of the growth capacity within the 4 Urban Growth Area shall be instituted. 5 6 FW-12a All jurisdictions within King County share the responsibility to 7 accommodate the 20-year population protection. The growth projection 8 shall be assigned to the four subareas of King County(Sea-Shore, East, 9 South. and the Rural Cities) proportionate with the share of projected 10 employment growth. The growth shall be allocated pursuant to the 11 following objectives: 12 a. To ensure efficient use of land within the UGA by directing growth to 13 Urban Centers and Activity Centers;- • 14 b. To limit development in the Rural Areas; 15 c. To protect designated resource lands; 16 d. To ensure efficient use of infrastructure; I 17 e. To improve the iobs/housing balance on a subarea basis; 18 f. To promote a land use pattern that can be served by public 19 transportation and other alternatives to the single occupancy vehicle; 20 and 21 g. To provide sufficient opportunities for growth within the jurisdictions. 22 23 FW-12b The growth targets established pursuant to the methodology described in 24 LU-25c and 25d shall be supported by both regional and local 25 transportation investments. The availability of an adequate 26 transportation system is critically important to accommodating growth. 27 The regional responsibility shall be met by planning for and delivering 28 county, state, and federal investments that support the growth targets 29 and the land use pattern of the County. This includes investments in 3o transit, state highways in key regional transportation corridors, and in 31 improved access to the designated Urban Centers. The local • 32 responsibility shall be met by local transportation system investments 33 that support the achievement of the targets. 34 35 LU—25a Each jurisdiction shall plan for and accommodate the household and 36 employment targets established pursuant to LU-25c and LU-25d. This 37 obligation includes: _ 38 a. Ensuring adequate zoning capacity; and 39 b. Planning for and delivering water, sewer, transportation and other j 40 infrastructure, in concert with federal and state investments and 41 recognizing where applicable special purpose districts; and 42 c. Accommodating increases in household and employment targets as 43 annexations occur. 44 - 45 The targets will be used to plan for and to accommodate growth within 46 each jurisdiction. The targets do not obligate a jurisdiction to guarantee 47 that a given number of housing units will be built or lobs added during the 48 planning period. UGMPG02GMPC./Moto2-1.doc — 3 - Arrommirsomilimmemmillor *OW •4160 14653 • • 1 LU25b As annexations occur, growth targets shall be adjusted. Household and 2 employment targets for each jurisdiction's potential annexation area, as 3 adopted in Table LU-it shall be transferred to the annexing jurisdiction 4 follows: 5 6 a. King County and the respective city will determine new household 7 and employment targets for areas under consideration for 8 annexation prior to the submittal of the annexation proposal to the 9 King County Boundary Review Board; to b. A citv's household and employment targets shall be increased by a it share of the target for the potential annexation area proportionate to 12 the share of the potential annexation area's development capacity 13 • located within the area annexed. Each city will determine how and 14 where within their corporate boundaries to accommodate the target 15 increases; 16 c. The County's target shall be correspondingly decreased to ensure 17 that overall target levels in the county remain the same; • 18 d. The household and employment targets in Table LU-1 will be 19 updated periodically to reflect changes due to annexations. These 20 target updates do not require adoption by the Growth Management 21 Planning Council. 22 • 23 LU - ((67))25cThe target((sand-regulations)) oblectives identified in ((LU-66)) 24 FW-12a((are-based-on)) shall be realized through the following ((steps)) 25 methodology for allocating household targets: 26 a. (( 27 28 , )) Determine the additional • 29 population that must be accommodated countywide by calculating the 30 difference between the most recent Census count and the State 31 Office of Financial Management population projection for the end of 32 the twenty year planning period; 33 b. ( 34 35 • :)) 36 Subtract a percentage from that number to represent the amount of• 37 growth that is assumed to occur in the unincorporated Rural Area., 38 (( . 39 , 40 , 41 , 42 43 , 44 , 45 ' 46 , 47 ;)) UGMPC./02GMPC/Mot02-I.doc — 4 - *ssie Ire 14653 1 c. Assign proportions of the urban population growth to each of the four 2 • subareas(Sea-Shore,South. East, and Rural Cities) based on the 3 proportion of future employment growth forecasted for each of those 4 subareas by the Puget Sound Regional Council; 5 d. Convert the estimated projected population for each subarea to an 6 estimated number of households; using projected average 7 household sizes that reflect the variation among those subareas 8 observed in the most recent Census; 9 e. Allocate a household target to individual jurisdictions, within each • 10 . subarea, based on FW-12a and considering the following factors: 11 1. the availability of water and the capacity of the sewer system; 12 2. the remaining portions of previously adopted household targets: 13 3. the presence of urban centers and activity areas within each 14 jurisdiction; 15 4. the availability of zoned development capacity in each jurisdiction; 16 and 17 • 5. the apparent market trends for housing in the area. 18 (( , 19 20 ;)) 21 (( , • 22 23 ; )) 24 (( , 25 '--114Pau914-the-Pfeceser-establishefj-under-FW-1-Stef3-4brikhe 26 ' 27 1 28 PlaRe7)) 29 f. Jurisdictions shall plan for household targets as adopted in Table 30 LU-1: and • 31 ((f))g. Monitoring should follow the process described in policy FW- 32 1. 33 34 A portion of the urban employment growth will occur in Activity Areas and neighborhoods 35 in the Urban Area. This employment growth will support the Urban Centers, while 36 balancing local employment opportunities in the Urban Area. 37 . 38 39 LU -((68))25d 40 41 42 steps)) The target objectives identified in FW-12a shall be realized 43 through the following methodology for allocating employment targets: 44 45 a. 46 47 IJGMPC/02GMPC/Mot02-1.doc — 5 - Ammommomlimosemommiv 14653 1 2 . 3 4 5 6 ; 7 8 capa.Ccity- 9 10 ; 11 12 13 : 14 15 residential-areas)) Determine the number of jobs that must be 16 accommodated in each of the four subareas of King County(Sea- 17 Shore, South, East, and the Rural Cities) in accordance with the most 18 recent PSRC iob estimates and forecasts for the 20-year planning 19 period. To account for uncertainty in the-employment forecasts, 1 20 establish a range of new lobs that must be accommodated in each 21 subarea. Unless exceptional circumstances dictate, the range should 22 be 5%on either side of the PSRC forecast. 23 b. 24 25 )) For each subarea, determine the 26 point within the range upon which iurisdictions within the subarea will 27 base their targets and allocate employment growth targets to . 28. individual iurisdictions based on consideration of the following: 29 1. the PSRC small area forecasts; 30 2. the presence of urban centers, manufacturino/industrial 31 centers, and activity areas within each jurisdiction; 32 3. the availability of zoned commercial and industrial 33 development capacity in each iurisdiction and; 34 4. the access to transit, as well as to existing highways and 35 arterials. 36 37 . 38 39 40 7• 41 • 42 43 •)) 44 c. Jurisdictions shall plan for employment targets as adopted in Table 45 LU-1. 46 (INSERT TABLE LU-1) IGMPG02OMPC/Mot02-J.doc — 6 - 14653 1 F. 1. Urban Residential Areas 2 Urban residential areas form the bulk of the UGA, and are home to a large portion of the 3 County's population. They will contain a mix of uses and will have different 4 characteristics in different neighborhoods. Generally, the character,form,preservation 5 and development of these areas((is-a))are the responsibility of the local jurisdiction((al 6 responsibility)). However, the residential areas need to support the Centers concept and 1 7 provide sufficient opportunity for growth within the UGA. A substantial majority of new 8 residential units will be constructed within urban residential areas. 9 10 11 LU-66 In order to ensure efficient use of the land within the UGA, provide for . 12 housing opportunities, and to support efficient use of infrastructure, each 13 jurisdiction shall: 14 15 a. Establish in its comprehensive plan a target minimum number of net 16 new households the jurisdiction will accommodate in the next 20 ! 17 years in accordance with the adopted household growth targets 18 identified in Table LU-1. Jurisdictions shall adopt regulations to and 19 commit to fund infrastructure sufficient to achieve the target number; . 20 b. Establish a minimum density (not including critical areas)for new 21 construction in each residential zone; and 22 c. Establish in the comprehensive plan a target mix of housing types for 23 new development and adopt regulations to achieve the target mix. 24 25 . 26 • . 27 28 4 95 000; 29 . 30 31. 32 33 34 35 . 36 . 37 38 39 • ' 40 ; 41 42 . 43 44 ; . 45 . 46 47 ; LGMPC/02GMPC/Mot02-1.doc — 7 — 14653 1 , 2 3 4 ; 5 6 7 '. I Irban Employment Growth 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 , . 17 18 19 20 61 9fia: 21 ; 22 23 ; 24 25 6apasity 26 27 ; 28 29 • 30 31 32 ; 33 34 the-Growth-Management-Planning-Cound , 35 ; 36 , 37 38 39 ; 40 , 41 , 42 43 44 or loca ns. 45 46 47 48 1./GMPCJ02GMPC/Mot02-1.doc — 8 - Noe' Ntaie • 14653 1 ADOPTED by the Growth Management Planning Council of King County on July 24, 2 2002 in open session. 3 4 5 6 7 Ron Sims,Chair,Growth Management Planning Council 8 9 10 11 12 13 • 14 15 • • • ot02-1.doc — 9 - Agrior Attachment 2 2003-0124 14653 • July 24,2002 Sponsored By: Executive Committee • /cm 1 MOTION NO. 02-2 2 A MOTION by the Growth Management Planning Council of King 3 County recommending the amendment of the Countywide Planning 4 Policies adding targets far new household for the period 2001-2022 5 by deleting Appendix 2,2A and 2B and amending Table LU-1: 2001- 6 2022 Household and Employment Growth Targets which will be 7 located in Section M.C of the Countywide Planning Policies. 8 9 WHEREAS,the 1994 Countywide Planning Policies established a housing target range for 10 each city and for King County;and 11 12 WHEREAS,the Growth Management Act requires the 1994 targets need to be revised to 13 establish an extension of the targets through 2022;and 14 15 WHEREAS the Growth Management Planning Council met and discussed the extension of 16 the household and employment targets for the period 2001-2022,with opportunity for 17 public comment on March 28,2001,July 25,2001,October 24,2001 and May 22,2002. 18 THE GROWTH MANAGEMENT PLANNING COUNCIL OF KING COUNTY 19 HEREBY MOVES AS FOLLOWS: 20 21, The attached Table LU-1:2001-2022 Household and Employment Growth Targets 22 is hereby recommended for adoption in the Countywide Planning Policies to revise 23 the household growth targets to reflect the target extension from January 1,2001 • 24 through December 31,2022 and Appendix 2,2A,2B are recommended for 25 deletion. 26 27 28 • 29 30 • 31 32 33 34 • 35 36 14653 1 2 3 ADOPTED by the Growth Management Planning Council of King County on 4 September 25,2002 in open session. 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 Ron Sims,Chair,Growth Management Planning Council 12 Attachment: 13 1. 'Table LU-1:2001-2022 Household and Employment Growth Targets. • • • • • i. - • • • LGMPG02GMPGMot02-2.doc -= 2 - Attachment 3 2003-0124 14653 July 24,2002 • Sponsored By: Executive Committee /cm • 1 MOTION NO. 02-3 2 A MOTION by the Growth Management Planning Council of King 3 County recommending the amendment of the Countywide Planning 4 . Policies adding targets for new jobs for the period 2001-2022 by 5 amending Table LU-1: 2001-2022 Household and Employment 6 Growth Targets which will be located in Section III.C of the 7 Countywide Planning Policies. 8 9 'WHEREAS,the 1994 Countywide Planning Policies established an employment target 10 range for each city and for King County;and 11 12 WHEREAS,the 1994 targets need to be revised to establish an extension of the targets 13 through 2022 as required by the Growth Management Act. 14 15 WHEREAS the Growth Management Planning Council met and discussed the extension of 16 the household and employment targets for the period 2001-2022,with opportunity for 17 public comment on March 28,2001,July 25,2001,October 24,2001 and May 22,2002. 18 THE GROWTH MANAGEMENT PLANNING COUNCIL OF KING COUNTY 19 HEREBY MOVES AS FOLLOWS: 20 21 The attached Table LU-1: 2001-2022 Household and Employment Growth Targets 22 is hereby recommended for adoption in the Countywide Planning Policies to revise 23 the employment growth targets to reflect the target extension from January 1,2001 24 through December 31,2022. • 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 • 33 34 35 36 Noe *aloe • 14653 • 1 2 3 ADOPTED by the Growth Management Planning Council of King County on 4 September 25,2002 in open session. 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 Ron Sims,Chair,Growth Management Planning Council 13 14 Attachment: 15 1. Table LU-1:2001-2022 Household and Employment Growth Targets. • • LGMPC/02GMPC./Mot02-3.doc — 2 1410 *if 0 Metropolitan King County Council Growth Management and Unincorporated Areas Committee Staff Report Agenda Item: 7 Name: Lauren Smith Proposed Ordinance: 2003-0124 Date: March 18, 2003 Attending: Paul Reitenbach, King County DDES Kevin Wright, King County PAO SUBJECT: Proposed Ordinance 2003-0124 adopting amendments to the Countywide Planning Policies; adopting new household and employment targets for the period 2001 through 2022; ratifying the amended Countywide Planning Policies on behalf of the population of unincorporated King County. BACKGROUND: The Growth Management Planning Council (GMPC) is a formal body comprised of elected officials from King County, Seattle, Bellevue, the Suburban Cities, and Special Districts. The GMPC was created in 1990 in response to a provision in the Washington State Growth Management Act (GMA) requiring cities and counties to work together to adopt Countywide Planning Policies (CPPs). Under GMA, countywide planning policies serve as the framework for each individual jurisdiction's comprehensive plan, and ensure regional consistency with respect to land use planning efforts. The GMPC drafted the CPPs, which were then adopted by the King County Council and ratified by the cities. Changes to the CPPs are recommended by the GMPC, adopted by the King County Council, and ratified by the cities. GMPC Development of Household & Employment Targets In February 2002, the Washington State Office of Financial Management released new population forecasts for the 20-year period 2002-2022 (the projections were smaller than expected, largely due to the current economic climate). The GMA requires King County and the cities within King County to plan to accommodate these updated projections. The GMPC is responsible for developing updated household and employment targets for each jurisdiction in King County. The GMPC's interjurisdictional staff team worked with a subcommittee of the King County Planning Directors to extend the existing targets through 2022, with the GMPC's approval of their methodology. In recent years, the region has grappled with the concept of a jobs/housing "balance" as part of ongoing growth management discussions. The development of the updated targets was approached with the jobs/housing balance in mind. The methodology approved by the GMPC took a sub-regional approach. First, the County's urban area was divided into four subareas: "SeaShore" (comprised of Seattle, Shoreline, and C:\WINDOWSITEMP\2003-0124(CPP Amendments-Household Employment Targetsx3-18-03).doc 5/212003 8:50 AM err Nato Lake Forest Park), East King County, South King County and the Rural Cities'. Next, a percentage of the total population forecast for King County was assigned to each subarea that was based on the percentage of expected job growth for each subarea (employment forecasts were provided by the Puget Sound Regional Council). Finally, the raw population numbers were converted into households (based on the average household size in each subarea), and the jurisdictions within each subarea negotiated their household targets. The draft household and employment targets were presented to the GMPC On May 22, 2002 at which time the GMPC directed staff to prepare motions recommending their adoption. Policy changes related to the new targets were adopted on July 24, 2002 and the targets themselves were adopted on September 25, 2002. Development of the household targets was informed by the results of the Buildable Lands work (required by GMA), which has been developed over the past 5 years (the Buildable Lands Report was released in August, 2002). Major findings from this work include: • 96% of all new development in King County is occurring within Urban Growth Areas. • 40% of the way through the 1992-2012 planning period, King County has reached 38% of the household growth target, and more than 50% of the population forecast. • King County has the capacity for 263,000 more housing units. This is more than twice the capacity needed to accommodate the remainder of the 1992-2012 household growth targets. • King County has the capacity for nearly 600,000 more jobs within the Urban Growth Area—several times the remaining target of 110,000 jobs for the period 1992-2012. • All available evidence suggests that there is enough capacity to support the new targets through 2022. SUMMARY: Proposed Ordinance 2003-0127 would amend the Countywide Planning Policies by: • Adopting revised household targets for each jurisdiction in King County for the period 2001-2022; • Adopting revised employment targets for each jurisdiction in King County for the period 2001-2022; and • Amending the policy direction in the Countywide Planning Policies in support of the new household and employment targets. Additionally,the ordinance would ratify these changes on behalf of the population of unincorporated King County, as required by Countywide Planning Policy FW-1, Step 9. Amendments to the Countywide Planning Policies become effective when ratified by ordinance or resolution by at least 30% of the city and county governments representing 70% of the population of King County according to the Interlocal agreement. A city shall be deemed to have ratified the countywide planning policy unless,within 90 days of adoption by King County, the city by legislative action disapproves the Countywide Planning Policy. ATTACHMENTS: Although the Carnation,Duvall,Enumclaw,North Bend and Snoqualmie are called Rural Cities,the Growth Management Act considers all municipalities to be Urban. Rural cities provide the vast majority of services and infrastructure for residents of the Rural unincorporated area,and they do have growth targets,albeit small ones when compared to cities in the main urban growth area. C:\WINDOWSITEMP12003-0124(CPP Amendments-Household Employment Targetsx3-18-03).doe 5/21/2003 8:50 AM 1. Proposed Ordinance 2003-0124,with attachments C:\WINDOWSSTEMP\2003-0124(CPP Amendments-Household Employment Targets)(3-18-03).doc 521/2003 8:50 AM KING COUNTY 1200 King County Courthouse 516 Third Avenue Seattle,WA 98104 Signature Report May 19, 2003 Ordinance 14654 Proposed No. 2003-0125.1 Sponsors Hague 1 AN ORDINANCE adopting amendments to•the 2 Countywide Planning Policies;amending the Urban 3 Separator map to reflect negotiated modifications to the j 4 Renton Urban Separator,ratifying the amended 5 Countywide Planning Policies for unincorporated King 6 County;and amending Ordinance 10450,Section 3,as 7 amended,and K.C.C.20.10.030 and Ordinance 10450, 8 Section 4,as amended,and K.C.C.20.10.040 9 10 11 BE IT ORDAINED BY THE COUNCIL OF KING COUNTY: 12 SECTION 1. Findings. The council makes the following findings.. 13 A. The metropolitan King County council adopted and ratified the Growth 14 Management Planning Council recommended King County 2012-Countywide Planning 15 Policies(Phase I)in July 1992,under Ordinance 10450. • 1 Ordinance 14654 16 B. The metropolitan King County council adopted and ratified the Phase II 17 amendments to the Countywide Planning Policies on August 15, 1994,under Ordinance 18 11446. 19 C. The Growth Management Planning Council met on October 23,2002 and 20 voted to recommend amendments to the King County 2012-Countywide Planning 21 Policies,amending the Urban Separator map to reflect negotiated modifications to the 22 Renton Urban Separator. • 23 SECTION 2. Ordinance 10450,Section 3,as amended,and K.C.C.20.10.030 are 24 each hereby amended to read as follows: 25 Phase II. 26 A. The Phase II Amendments to the King County 2012 Countywide Planning 27 Policies attached to Ordinance 11446 are hereby approved and adopted. 28 B. The Phase II Amendments to the King County 2012-Countywide Planning 29 Policies are amended,as shown by Attachment 1 to Ordinance 12027. 30 C. The Phase II Amendments to the King County 2012-Countywide Planning 31 Policies are amended,as shown by Attachment 1 to Ordinance 12421. • • 32 D. The Phase II Amendments to the King County 2012-Countywide Planning 33 Policies are amended,as shown by Attachment 1 and 2 to Ordinance 13260. 34 E. The Phase II Amendments to the King County 2012-Countywide PIanning 35 Policies are amended,as shown by Attachment 1 through 4 to Ordinance 13415. • 36 F. The Phase II Amendments to the King County 2012-Countywide Planning 37 Policies are amended,as shown by Attachments 1 through 3 to Ordinance 13858. • • Ordinance 14654 38 G. The Phase II Amendments to the King County 2012—Countywide Planning 39 Policies are amended,as shown by Attachment 1 to Ordinance 14390. 40 H. The Phase II Amendments to the King County 2012—Countywide Planning 41 Policies are amended,as shown by Attachment 1 to Ordinance 14391. • 42 I. The Phase II Amendments to the King County 2012—Countywide Planning 43 Policies are amended,as shown by Attachment 1 to Ordinance 14392. 44 J. The Phase II Amendments to the King County 2012—Countywide Planning 45 Policies are amended,as shown by Attachment 1 to this ordinance. 46 SECTION 3. Ordinance 10450,Section 4,as amended,and K.C.C.20.10.040 are 47 each hereby amended to read as follows: 48 Ratification for unincorporated King County. 49 A. Countywide Planning Policies adopted by Ordinance 10450 for the purposes 50 specified are hereby ratified on behalf of the population of unincorporated King County. 51 B. The amendments to the Countywide Planning Policies adopted by Ordinance , 52 10840 are hereby ratified on behalf of the population of unincorporated King County. 53 C. The amendments to the Countywide Planning Policies adopted by Ordinance 54 11061 are hereby ratified on behalf of the population of unincorporated King County. 55 D. The Phase II amendments to the King County 2012 Countywide Planning 56 Policies adopted by Ordinance 11446 are hereby ratified on behalf of the population of 57 unincorporated King County. 58 E. The amendments to the King County 2012-Countywide Planning Policies,as 59 shown by Attachment 1 to Ordinance 12027 are hereby ratified on behalf of the 60 population of unincorporated King County. 3 Ordinance 14654 • 61 P. The amendments to the King County 2012-Countywide Planning Policies,as 62 shown by Attachment 1 to Ordinance 12421,are hereby ratified on behalf of the 63 population of unincorporated King County. 64 G. The amendments to the King County 2012-Countywide Planning.Policies,as 65 shown by Attachments 1 and 2 to Ordinance 13260,are hereby ratified on behalf of the 66 population of unincorporated King County. 67 H. The amendments to the King County 2012-Countywide Planning Policies,as 68 shown by Attachment 1 through 4 to Ordinance 13415,are hereby ratified on behalf of 69 the population of unincorporated King County. 70 I. The amendments to the King County 2012-Countywide Planning Policies,as 71 shown by Attachments 1 through 3 to Ordinance 13858,are hereby ratified on behalf of 72 the population of unincorporated King County. • 73 J. The amendments to the King County 2012-Countywide Planning Policies,as 74 shown by Attachment 1 to Ordinance 14390,are hereby ratified on behalf of the 75 population of unincorporated King County.. 76 K. The amendments to the King County 2012-Countywide Planning Policies,as • 77 shown by Attachment 1 to Ordinance 14391,are hereby ratified on behalf of the • 78 population of unincorporated King County. 79 L. The amendments to the King County 2012-Countywide Planning Policies,as 80 shown by Attachment 1 to Ordinance 14392,are hereby ratified on behalf of the 81 population of unincorporated King County. 4 Ordinance 14654 82 M. The amendments to the King County 2012-Countywide Planning Policies,as 83 shown by Attachment 1 to this ordinance,are hereby ratified on behalf of the population 84 of unincorporated King County. 85 Ordinance 14654 was introduced on 3/17/2003 and passed by the Metropolitan King County Council on 5/19/2003,by the following vote: Yes: 12-Ms.Sullivan,Ms.Edmonds,Mr.von Reichbauer,Ms.Lambert,Mr. Phillips,Mr.Pelz,Mr.McKenna,Mr.Constantine,Mr. Gossett,Ms.Hague, Mr.Irons and Ms.Patterson No:0 Excused:0 KING COUNTY COUNCIL KING COUNTY,WASHINGTON • Cynthia Sullivan,Chair ATTEST: "'" o aMtAMI.1 - Anne Nods,Clerk of the Council ,5 r r'- APPROVED this at day of ritgi ,2003 k Ron S' ty Executive • Attachments 1.GMPC Motion 02-5 5 *418.0 • Attachment 1 2003-0125 14654 • • October 23,2002 . Sponsored By: Executive Committee • 1 MOTION NO. 02-5 2 A MOTION to amend the Urban Separator Map in the 3 Countywide Planning Policies to reflect the negotiated • 4 modifications of the Renton Urban Separator. 5 6 WHEREAS, The Growth Management Act states that each Urban Growth Area shall 7 permit urban densities and shall include greenbelt and open space areas; 8 9 WHEREAS, Urban Separators are an adopted regional strategy serving multiple functions 10 and providing environmental, visual, recreational and wildlife benefits to the citizens and 11 communities of King County; 12 13 WHEREAS, Consistent with the Countywide Planning Policies, the King County 14 Comprehensive Plan recognizes that Urban Separators create open space corridors,provide 15 a visual contrast to continuous development, and reinforce the unique identities of 16 communities; 17 18 WHEREAS, King County has designated Urban Separators on the Land Use 2000 map in 19 the King County Comprehensive Plan, and King County has provided advance copies of 20 Urban Separator maps to cities that have designated Urban Separators located within their 21 Potential Annexation Areas; ' 22 23 WHEREAS,the City of Renton disagreed with Urban Separator.designation for 76 acres of 24 land within its Potential Annexation Area;and 25 26 WHEREAS, the Growth Management Planning Council directed staff to attempt to 27 negotiate a mutually acceptable resolution of this disagreement 28 V V 29 30 31 . 32 33 34 • • 1 14654 •• • 3 THE GROWTH MANAGEMENT PLANNING COUNCIL OF KING COUNTY 4 HEREBY MOVES AS FOLLOWS: 5 6 The Urban Separators map included within the Countywide Planning Policies document is 7 amended to reflect the negotiated modifications of the Renton Urban Separator described 8 and mapped in the September 25,2002 GMPC staff report. Specifically,76 acres of 9 unincorporated land is deleted from Urban Separator designation and 118.8 acres within 10 the City of Renton shall be designated Urban Separator. 11 12 ADOPTED by the Growth Management Planning Council of King County on 13 October 23,2002 in open session. 14 15 16 • 17 18 19 I 20 c:A:L_44A7) - 21 22 Ron Sims,Chair,Growth Management Planning Council • • UGMPC/2� 2GMoo PC/Motiono2-5_aoc 0 Metropolitan King County Council Growth Management and Unincorporated Areas Committee Staff Report Agenda Item: 8 Name: Lauren Smith Proposed Ordinance: 2003-0125 Date: March 18, 2003 Attending: Paul Reitenbach, King County DDES Kevin Wright, King County PAO SUBJECT: Proposed Ordinance 2003-0125 adopting amendments to the Countywide Planning Policies; amending the Urban Separator map to reflect negotiated modifications to the Renton Urban Separator; ratifying the amended Countywide Planning Policies on behalf of the population of unincorporated King County. BACKGROUND: The Growth Management Planning Council (GMPC) is a formal body comprised of elected officials from King County, Seattle, Bellevue,the Suburban Cities, and Special Districts. The GMPC was created in 1990 in response to a provision in the Washington State Growth Management Act (GMA) requiring cities and counties to work together to adopt Countywide Planning Policies (CPPs). Under GMA, countywide planning policies serve as the framework for each individual jurisdiction's comprehensive plan, and ensure regional consistency with respect to land use planning efforts. The GMPC drafted the CPPs, which were then adopted by the King County Council and ratified by the cities. Changes to the CPPs are recommended by the GMPC, adopted by the King County Council, and ratified by the cities. Countywide Planning Policies: Policy Direction related to Urban Separators Urban Separators are regionally significant low-density areas within the Urban Growth Area that create open space corridors, provide a visual contrast to continuous development and reinforce the unique identities of communities. Urban Separators can play a significant role in preserving environmentally sensitive areas and providing fish and wildlife habitat. They also provide regional benefits, such as parks and trails, and meet the Growth Management Act's requirement for greenbelts and open space within the Urban Growth Area. Urban Separators are governed by Countywide Planning Policy LU-27: LU-27 Urban Separators are low-density areas or areas of little development within the Urban Growth Area. Urban Separators shall be defined as permanent low-density lands which protect adjacent resource lands, Rural Areas, and environmentally sensitive areas and create open space corridors within and between Urban Areas which provide • environmental, visual, recreational and wildlife benefits. Designated urban separators shall not be redesignated in the future (in the 20-year planning cycle)to other urban uses or higher densities. The maintenance of these urban separators is a regional as C:\WINDOWS\TEMP12003-0125(CPP Amendments-Renton Urban SeparatorX3-18-03).doc 5/212003 8:50 AM Nrire well as local concern. Therefore, no modifications should be made to the development regulations governing these areas without King County review and concurrence. Urban Separators are within the Urban Growth Area and therefore are appropriate to be annexed by cities. Once annexed, Urban Separators (and all other annexed land) are shown as "incorporated areas"on the County's comprehensive land use map. The lack of a map of Urban Separators in the countywide planning document was seen by the staff as problematic because it increased the likelihood that cities might be unaware of the presence of Urban Separators within their Potential Annexation Areas. Therefore, the interjurisdictional staff team recommended that the GMPC adopt a map of existing Urban Separators. Three cities have designated Urban Separators within their Potential Annexation Areas: Auburn, Kent, and Renton. Past GMPC Actions related to Urban Separators July 25, 2001 GMPC staff recommends including a map of existing urban separators in the Countywide Planning Policies. Member jurisdictions of the GMPC express concern over the boundaries of designated Urban Separators and ask the interjurisdictional staff team to present additional information at the September meeting. September 26, 2001 GMPC directs staff to meet with affected cities (Kent, Renton and Auburn)to answer questions and clarify the boundaries of the designated Urban Separators. October 5, 2001 King County staff meets with Kent, Renton and Auburn to answer questions and clarify the boundaries of the designated Urban Separators. November 20, 2001 The interjurisdictional staff team reports to the GMPC Executive Committee that staff has successfully negotiated a solution to concerns about mapping Urban Separators raised by Renton and Auburn. The Executive Committee directs staff to develop a motion for the GMPC's consideration at the December meeting. December 11, 2001 GMPC adopts Motion 01-1, adopting maps of uncontested Urban Separators and setting in place a process to further analyze and refine the Urban Separators in Renton and Aubum's Potential Annexation Areas, to be completed no later than September 30, 2002. September 25, 2002 The interjurisdictional staff team reported back to the GMPC with the following information on the City of Renton and Auburn's Urban Separators: City of Renton Renton did not agree with the Urban Separator designation for 76 acres of unincorporated urban land within their Potential Annexation Area (PAA), citing lack of environmental C:IWINDOWSITEMP12003-0125(CPP Amendments-Renton Urban SeparatorX3-18-03).doc 5/21/2003 8:50 AM constraints. However, Renton did identify 119 acres within their city limits that they felt met the criteria for designation of Urban Separators. The City proposed removing the Urban Separator designation from the 76 acres within their PAA, and applying the designation to the 119 acres within their city boundaries, for a net gain of 43 acres. The interjurisdictional staff team field- checked the two areas and concurred with the city's conclusions. City of Auburn Auburn did not agree with the Urban Separator designation for 178 acres of land within their PM, but has identified 153 acres they do feel meets the criteria. The City of Kent recently annexed a large piece of property adjacent to Aubum's existing Urban Separator that the interjurisdictional staff team believes contains environmentally constrained areas and that would make a natural extension of the existing Urban Separator. However, the City of Kent does not wish to consider designating this area until sometime in 2003. Therefore, the interjurisdictional staff team recommends that discussions should continue with Auburn and Kent, and that staff should report back to the GMPC with recommendations by June 1, 2003. October 23, 2002 The GMPC adopted Motion 02-5, amending the Countywide Planning Policies to reflect the negotiated modifications to the Renton Urban Separator. SUMMARY: Proposed Ordinance 2003-0125 would amend the Countywide Planning Policies by: • Revising the Urban Separator map to reflect the negotiated modifications to the Renton Urban Separator, as indicated on the map in Attachment 2 to this staff report. Additionally, the ordinance would ratify these changes on behalf of the population of unincorporated King County, as required by Countywide Planning Policy FW-1, Step 9. Amendments to the Countywide Planning Policies become effective when ratified by ordinance or resolution by at least 30% of the city and county governments representing 70% of the population of King County according to the Interlocal agreement. A city shall be deemed to have ratified the countywide planning policy unless, within 90 days of adoption by King County, the city by legislative action disapproves the Countywide Planning Policy. ATTACHMENTS: 1. Proposed Ordinance 2003-0125,with attachments 2. Map of Renton Urban Separator C:\WINDOWS\TEMP\2003-0125(CPP Amendments-Renton Urban SeparatorX3-18-03).doc 5/21/2003 8:50 AM Nose KING COUNTY 1200 Bing County Courthouse 516 Third Avenue Seattle,WA 98104 Signature Report May 20, 2003 Ordinance 14655 • Proposed No. 2003-0126.1 Sponsors Hague 1 AN ORDINANCE adopting amendments to the 2 Countywide Planning Policies;designating Totem Lake as 3 an Urban Center;ratifying the amended Countywide 4 Planning Policies for unincorporated King County;and • 5 amending Ordinance 10450,Section.3,as amended,and 6 K.C.C.20.10.030 and Ordinance 10450,Section 4,as 7 amended,and K.C.C.20.10.040 8 9 10 BE IT ORDAINED BY THE COUNCIL OF KING COUNTY: • 11 SECTION 1. Findings. The council makes the following findings. 12 A. The metropolitan King County council adopted and ratified the Growth 13_ Management Planning Council recommended King County 2012-Countywide Planning 14 Policies(Phase I)in July 1992,under Ordinance 10450. 15 B. The metropolitan King County council adopted and ratified the Phase II 16 amendments to the Countywide Planning Policies on August 15, 1994,under Ordinance 17 11446. • • Ordinance 14655 18 C. The Growth Management Planning Council met on October 23,2002 and 19 voted to recommend amendments to the King County 2012-Countywide Planning 20 Policies,designating Totem Lake as an Urban Center. 21 SECTION 2. Ordinance 10450,Section 3,as amended,and K.C.C.20.10.030 are 22 each hereby amended to read as follows: 23 Phase II. 24 A. The Phase II Amendments to the King County 2012 Countywide Planning 25 Policies attached to Ordinance 11446 are hereby approved and adopted. 26 B. The Phase II Amendments to the King County 2012-Countywide Planning 27 Policies are amended,as shown by Attachment 1 to Ordinance 12027. 28 C. The Phase II Amendments to the King County 2012-Countywide Planning 29 Policies are amended,as shown by Attachment 1 to Ordinance 12421. 30 D. The Phase II Amendments to the King County 2012-Countywide Planning 31 . Policies are amended,as shown by Attachment 1 and 2 to Ordinance 13260. 32 E. The Phase II Amendments to the King County 2012-Countywide Planning 33 Policies are amended,as shown by Attachment 1 through 4 to Ordinance 13415. 34 - F. The Phase II Amendments to the King County 2012-Countywide Planning 35 • Policies are amended,as shown by Attachments 1 through 3 to Ordinance 13858. 36 G. The Phase II Amendments to the King County 2012—Countywide Planning 37 Policies are amended,as shown by Attachment 1 to Ordinance 14390. 38 H. The Phase II Amendments to the King County 2012—Countywide Planning • 39 Policies are amended,as shown by Attachment 1 to Ordinance 14391. •• Ordinance 14655 40 I. The Phase II Amendments to the King County 2012—Countywide Planning 41 Policies are amended,as shown by Attachment 1 to Ordinance 14392. 42 J. The Phase II Amendments to the King County 2012—Countywide Planning 43 . Policies are amended,as shown by Attachment 1 to this ordinance. • 44 SECTION 3. Ordinance 10450,Section 4,as amended,and K.C.C.20.10.040 are 45 each hereby amended to read as follows: 46 Ratification for unincorporated King County. • 47 A. Countywide Planning Policies adopted by Ordinance 10450 for the purposes 48 specified are hereby ratified on behalf of the population of unincorporated King County. 49 B. The amendments to the Countywide Planning Policies adopted by Ordinance 50 10840 are hereby ratified on behalf of the population of unincorporated King County. 51 C. The amendments to the Countywide Planning Policies adopted by Ordinance 52 11061 are hereby ratified on behalf of the population of unincorporated King County. 53 D. The Phase II amendments to the King County 2012 Countywide Planning 54 Policies adopted by Ordinance 11446 are hereby ratified-on behalf of the population of 55 unincorporated King County. 56 E. The amendments to the King County 2012-Countywide Planning Policies,as 57 shown by Attachment 1 to Ordinance 12027 are hereby ratified on behalf of the • 58 population of unincorporated King County. 59 F. The amendments to the King County 2012-Countywide Planning Policies,as 60 shown by Attachment 1 to Ordinance 12421,are hereby ratified on behalf of the 61 population of unincorporated King County. • mow *40 Ordinance 14655 62 G. The amendments to the King County 2012-Countywide Planning Policies,as 63 shown by Attachments 1 and 2 to Ordinance 13260, are hereby ratified on behalf of the 64 population of unincorporated King County. 65 H. The amendments to the King County 2012-Countywide Planning Policies,as 66 shown by Attachment 1 through 4 to Ordinance 13415,are hereby ratified on behalf of 67 the population of unincorporated King County. 68 I. The amendments to the King County 2012-Countywide Planning Policies,as 69 shown by Attachments 1 through 3 to Ordinance 13858,are hereby ratified on behalf of 70 the population of unincorporated King County. 71 J. The amendments to the King County 2012-Countywide Planning Policies,as 72 shown by Attachment 1 to Ordinance 14390,are hereby ratified on behalf of the 73' population of unincorporated King County. 74 K. The amendments to the King County 2012-Countywide Planning Policies,as 75 shown by Attachment 1 to Ordinance 14391,are hereby ratified on behalf of the 76 population of unincorporated King County. 77 L. The amendments to the King County 2012-Countywide Planning Policies,as 78 shown by Attachment 1 to Ordinance 14392,are hereby ratified on behalf of the 79 population of unincorporated King County. 80 M. The amendments to the King County 2012-Countywide Planning Policies,as • • Noe• Ordinance 14655 81 shown by Attachment 1 to this ordinance,are hereby ratified on behalf of the population 82 of unincorporated King County. 83 • Ordinance 14655 was introduced on 3/17/2003 and passed by the Metropolitan King • County Council on 5/19/2003,by the following vote: Yes: 12-Ms.Sullivan,Ms.Edmonds,Mr. von Reichbauer,Ms.Lambert,Mr. Phillips,Mr.Pelz,Mr.McKenna,Mr. Constantine,Mr.Gossett,Ms.Hague, Mr.Irons and Ms.Patterson No:0 Excused:0 KING COUNTY COUNCIL KING COUNTY,WASHINGTON 40.4 //' / iii../441/g4(..) nthia Sullivan,Chair ,s,, ATTEST: _' o 64%)A1‘.. `-..�. -a c�. Anne Noris,Clerk of the Council i • APPROVED this 3day of MO1 ,2003. • n Si Executive • Attachments 1.GMPC Motion 02-6 • • • loolo • Attachment 1 2003-0126 14655 October 23,2002 Sponsored By: Executive Committee • 1 MOTION NO. 02-6 • 2 A MOTION to amend the Countywide Planning Policies by 3 designating Totem Lake as an Urban Center. Totem Lake is 4 added to the list of Urban Centers following Countywide 5 Planning Policy LU-39. 6 7 • 8 WHEREAS,A goal of the Growth Management Act is to encourage-development in Urban 9 Areas where adequate public facilities exist or can be provided in an efficient manner, 10 11 WHEREAS,Policy LU-39 of the Countywide Planning Policies of King County describes 12 the criteria for Urban Center designation; 13 14 WHEREAS,Policy LU-40 of the Countywide Planning Policies of King County describes 15 standards for planned land uses within Urban Centers; • 16 17 WHEREAS,the City of Kirkland has demonstrated that Totem Lake meets the criteria for 18 designation as an Urban Center, -and that Kirkland's "Totem Lake Activity Area" 19 designated on the City's comprehensive plan land use map is consistent with the standards 20 established by the Countywide Planning Policies for Urban Center designation. 21 22 WHEREAS,King County Comprehensive Plan Policy U-106 supports the development of 23 Urban Centers to meet the region's needs for housing, jobs, services, culture and 24 recreation. 25 . 26 27 28 29 • .30 31 32 33 1 14655 2 3 4 5 THE GROWTH MANAGEMENT PLANNING COUNCIL OF KING COUNTY 6 HEREBY MOVES AS FOLLOWS: 7 8 Totem Lake is designated as an Urban Center. The list of Urban Centers following 9 Countywide Planning Policy LU-39 is modified to include Totem Lake. 10 11 ADOYIED by the Growth Management Planning Council of King County on 12 October 23,2002 in open session. 13 14 15 • 16 17 18 19 20 21 - Ron Sims,Chair,Growth Management Planning Council • • • • LGMPG2002GMPGMotion02-6.doc • 0 Metropolitan King County Council Growth Management and Unincorporated Areas Committee Staff Report Agenda Item: 9 Name: Lauren Smith Proposed Ordinance: 2003-0126 Date: March 18, 2003 Attending: Paul Reitenbach, King County DDES Kevin Wright, King County PAO SUBJECT: Proposed Ordinance 2003-0126 adopting amendments to the Countywide Planning Policies; designating Totem Lake as an Urban Center; ratifying the amended Countywide Planning Policies on behalf of the population of unincorporated King County. BACKGROUND: The Growth Management Planning Council (GMPC) is a formal body comprised of elected officials from King County, Seattle, Bellevue, the Suburban Cities, and Special Districts. The GMPC was created in 1990 in response to a provision in the Washington State Growth Management Act (GMA) requiring cities and counties to work together to adopt Countywide Planning Policies (CPPs). Under GMA, countywide planning policies serve as the framework for each individual jurisdiction's comprehensive plan, and ensure regional consistency with respect to land use planning efforts. The GMPC drafted the CPPs, which were then adopted by the King County Council and ratified by the cities. Changes to the CPPs are recommended by the GMPC, adopted by the King County Council, and ratified by the cities. City of Kirkland requests Urban Center designation for Totem Lake In 2002, the City of Kirkland requested that Totem Lake be designated as an Urban Center in the Countywide Planning Policies. Urban Centers are envisioned in the CPPs as areas of concentrated employment and housing, with direct service by high-capacity transit, and a wide range of other land uses. They are expected to account for up to one half of King County's employment growth and one quarter of household growth over the next 20 years. In January, 2002 the Kirkland City Council adopted a new plan for the Totem Lake neighborhood that would support its designation as an Urban Center. Totem Lake, which is located in the northeast corner of Kirkland, encompasses about one square mile and includes residential, office, retail, light industrial and institutional uses. Designating Totem Lake as an Urban Center would involve amending Countywide Planning Policy LU-39 to add it to the list of existing Urban Centers,which currently includes: Bellevue + Redmond Overlake :• Seattle CBD Kent Redmond CBD + Seattle Center :• Federal Way :• Renton CBD e• First/Capitol Hill C:\WINDOWS\TEMP\2003-0126(CPP Amendments-Totem Lake Urban CenterX3-18-03).doc 5/21/2003 8:51 AM vow :• University District :• Northgate :• Tukwila In order to be designated as an Urban Center,jurisdictions must meet specific criteria in the Countywide Planning Policies, including having planned land uses to accommodate: :• A minimum of 15,000 jobs within one-half mile of a transit center; • At a minimum, an average of 50 employees per gross acre; and • At a minimum, an average of 15 households per acre. When fully realized, Urban Centers shall be characterized by the following: :• Clearly defined geographic boundaries; :• An intensity/density of land uses sufficient to support effective and rapid transit; :• Pedestrian emphasis within the Center; • Emphasis on superior urban design which reflects the local community; :• Limitations on single-occupancy vehicle usage during peak commute hours; ❖ A broad array of land uses and choices within those land uses for employees and residents; a• Sufficient public open spaces and recreational opportunities; and :• Uses which provide both daytime and nighttime activities in the Center. The interjurisdictional staff team analyzed the Totem Lake neighborhood against all of the criteria in the Countywide Planning Policies governing Urban Centers, and found that an Urban Center designation would be appropriate, for the following reasons: :• The City of Kirkland has completed the necessary planning to support an Urban Center designation. :• By 2012, Totem Lake is projected to contain over 4,500 housing units and 21,400 jobs. • Totem Lake is planned as a transit oriented development district with very high residential and commercial intensity. :• A new transit center will be constructed at the center of the transit oriented development district. :• Within %z mile of the transit center, 11,000 jobs and 2000 housing units are projected by 2012. Another 3,000 to 4,000 jobs are expected by 2022. •: Employment densities in Totem Lake are planned for a minimum of 130 jobs per acre (net), and will reach approximately 40 jobs per gross acre by 2022. • Residential densities are planned for 50-75 units/acre (net). Capacity will remain for additional job and housing growth beyond 2022. s Other comprehensive plan policies are in place to support pedestrian emphasis,job creation and re-investment, redevelopment, high density residential and high intensity commercial uses, design principles, infrastructure, parks and open space, and community services. SUMMARY: Proposed Ordinance 2003-0126 would amend the Countywide Planning Policies by: • Adding Totem Lake to the list of Urban Centers in Policy LU-39. Additionally, the ordinance would ratify the change on behalf of the population of unincorporated King County, as required by Countywide Planning Policy FW-1, Step 9. Amendments to the Countywide Planning Policies become effective when ratified by ordinance or resolution by at least 30% of the city and county governments representing 70% of the population of King County according to the Interlocal agreement. A city shall be deemed to C:IWMDOWS\TEMPt2003-0126(CPP Amendments-Totem Lake Urban CenterX3-18-03).doc 5/212003 8:51 AM Sr" Neol have ratified the countywide planning policy unless,within 90 days of adoption by King County, the city by legislative action disapproves the Countywide Planning Policy. ATTACHMENTS: 1. Proposed Ordinance 2003-0126,with attachments C:\WINDOWS\TEMP12003-0126(CPP Amendments-Totem Lake Urban Centerx3-18-03).doc 5/21/2003 8:51 AM KING COUNTY 1200 ring County Courthouse 516 Third Avenue Seattle,WA 98104 . * Signature Report May 20, 2003 Ordinance 14656 Proposed No. 2003-0127.1 Sponsors Hague 1 AN ORDINANCE adopting amendments to the 2 Countywide Planning Policies addressing the long-term • 3 protection of agricultural production districts;ratifying the • 4 amended Countywide Planning Policies for unincorporated 5 King County; and amending Ordinance 10450,Section 3, 6 as amended,and K.C.C.20.10.030 and Ordinance 10450, 7 Section 4,as amended,and K.C.C.20.10.040 8 . • 9 10 BE IT ORDAINED BY THE COUNCIL OF KING COUNTY: 11 SECTION 1. Findings. The council makes the following findings. 12 A. The metropolitan King County council adopted and ratified the Growth 13 Management Planning Council recommended King County 2012-Countywide Planning 14 Policies(Phase I)in July 1992,under Ordinance 10450. 15 B. The.metropolitan King County council adopted and ratified the Phase II • 16 amendments to the Countywide Planning Policies on August 15, 1994,under Ordinance 17 11446. 1 • Ordinance 14656 18 C. The Growth Management Planning Council met on June 16, 1999,and 19 adopted Motion 99-3,recommending amendments to the King County 2012- 20 Countywide Planning Policies addressing the long-term protection of agricultural 21 production districts;adopting new policies LU-2A and LU-2B,revising the interim 22 potential annexation area map so that the lower green river valley agricultural production 23 district is not within the potential annexation area of any city,and drawing the urban 24 growth area boundary around the lower green river valley agricultural production district 25 to clarify that it is outside of the urban growth area. 26 E. The King County Council adopted Motion 11208 on May 21,2001,requesting 27 that the GMPC review and reconsider its Motion'99-3 and provide for a thorough public 28 process,including opportunities for public testimony. 29 D. The Growth Management Planning Council met on September 26,2001 and 30 adopted Motion 01-2,reaffirming Motion 99-3. 31 ' SECTION 2. Ordinance 10450,Section 3,as amended,and K.C.C.20.10.030 are 32 each hereby amended to read as follows: 33 Phase II. 34 A. The Phase II Amendments to the King County 2012 Countywide Planning 35 Policies attached to Ordinance 11446 are hereby approved and adopted. • 36 B. The Phase II Amendments to the King County 2012-Countywide Planning 37 Policies are amended,as shown by Attachment 1 to Ordinance 12027. 38 C. The Phase II Amendments to the King County 2012-Countywide Planning 39 Policies are amended,as shown by Attachment 1 to Ordinance 12421. • ilogre Ordinance 14656 • 40 D. The Phase II Amendments to the King County 2012-Countywide Planning 41 Policies are amended,as shown by Attachment 1 and 2 to Ordinance 13260. 42 E. The Phase II Amendments to the King County 2012-Countywide Planning 43 Policies are amended,as shown by Attachment 1 through 4 to Ordinance.13415. 44 F. The Phase II Amendments to the King County 2012-Countywide Planning 45 Policies are amended,as shown by Attachments 1 through 3 to Ordinance 13858. 46 G. The Phase II Amendments to the King County 201-2—Countywide Planning 47 Policies are amended,as shown by Attachment 1 to Ordinance 14390. 48 H. The Phase II Amendments to the King County 2012—Countywide Planning 49 Policies are amended,as shown by Attachment 1 to Ordinance 14391. 50 I. The Phase II Amendments to the King County 2012—.Countywide Planning 51 Policies are amended,as shown by Attachment 1 to Ordinance 14392. 52 J. The Phase II Amendments to the King County 2012—Countywide Planning 53 Policies are amended,as shown by Attachments 1 and 2 to this ordinance. 54 SECTION 3. Ordinance 10450,Section 4,as amended,and K.C.C.20.10.040 are 55 each hereby amended to read as follows: 56 Ratification for unincorporated King County. 57 A. Countywide Planning Policies adopted by Ordinance 10450 for the purposes 58 specified are hereby ratified on behalf of the population of unincorporated King County. 59 B. The amendments to the Countywide Planning Policies adopted by Ordinance 60 .10840 are hereby ratified on behalf of the population of unincorporated King County. • 61 C. The amendments to the Countywide Planning Policies adopted by Ordinance 62 11061 are hereby ratified on behalf of the population of unincorporated King County. 3 tilaW Ordinance 14656 63 D. The Phase II amendments to the King County 2012 Countywide Planning 64 Policies adopted by Ordinance 11446 are hereby ratified on behalf of the population of • . 65 unincorporated King County. 66 E. The amendments to the King County 2012-Countywide Planning Policies,as • 67 shown by Attachment 1 to Ordinance 12027 are hereby ratified on behalf of the 68 population of unincorporated King County. 69 F. The amendments to the King County 2012-Countywide Planning Policies,as 70 shown by Attachment 1 to Ordinance 12421,are hereby ratified on behalf of the 71 population of unincorporated King County. 72 G. The amendments to the King County 2012-Countywide Planning Policies,as 73 shown by Attachments 1 and 2 to Ordinance 13260,are hereby ratified on behalf of the 74 population of unincorporated King County. 75 H. The amendments to the King County 2012-Countywide Planning Policies,as 76 shown by Attachment 1 through 4 to Ordinance 13415,are hereby ratified on behalf of 77 the population of unincorporated King County. 78 I. The amendments to the King County 2012-Countywide Planning Policies,as 79 shown by.Attachments 1 through 3 to Ordinance 13858,are hereby ratified on behalf of 80 the population of unincorporated King County. 81 • J. The amendments to the King County 2012-Countywide Planning Policies,as 82 shown by Attachment 1 to Ordinance 14390,are hereby ratified on behalf of the 83 population of unincorporated King County. • 4 11111101 • Ordinance 14656 • 84 K. The amendments to the King County 2012-Countywide Planning Policies,as 85 shown by Attachment Ito Ordinance 14391,are hereby ratified on behalf of the 86 population of unincorporated King County. 87 L. The amendments tb the King County 2012-Countywide Planning Policies,as 88 shown by Attachment 1 to Ordinance 14392,are hereby ratified on behalf of the 89 population of unincorporated King County. 90 M. The amendments to the King County 2012-Countywide Planning Policies,as • • • • • 5 Fm, 4410 140 Ordinance 14656 - 91 shown by Attachments 1 and 2 to this ordinance,are hereby ratified on behalf of the 92 population of unincorporated King County. 93 Ordinance 14656 was introduced on 3/17/2003 and passed by the Metropolitan King County Council on 5/19/2003,by the following vote: Yes: 12-Ms. Sullivan,Ms.Edmonds,Mr.von Reichbauer,Ms.Lambert,Mr. Phillips,Mr.Pelz,Mr.McKenna,Mr. Constantine,Mr.Gossett,Ms.Hague, Mr.Irons and Ms.Patterson No:0 Excused:0 • KING COUNTY COUNCIL KING COUNTY,WASHINGTON • Cynthia Sullivan,Chair w ._.. ATTEST: • --of, IT' • .X3 ty ikKkA.Ai Anne Noris,Clerk of the Council .i's N APPROVED this day of meti ,2003. • - - • Ron '; !. County Executi 411111 Attachments 1.GMPC Motion 99-3,2.GMPC Motion 01-2 • • Noe Attachment 2 2003-0127 14656 September 26,2001 Sponsored By: Executive Committee /pr 1 MOTION NO. 01-2 2 A MOTION reaffirming Motion 99-3 passed by the GMPC on June 16, 3 1999 amending the Countywide Planning Policies to add new policies that 4 address the long-term governance of Agricultural Production Districts. 5 6 WHEREAS,The Growth Management Act requires the maintenance,enhancement and 7 conservation of agricultural industries and lands through a variety of methods and programs; 8 9 WHEREAS,King County residents have supported efforts to preserve good farmland and active 10 farms for the value of local crops,dairy and livestock and for scenic and historic values; 11 12 WHEREAS,King County,through the Farmlands Preservation Program,has purchased the 13 development rights of 12,600 acres of farmland and has established the Agricultural Production 14 Districts(APDs)to further protect these and adjacent prime agricultural lands; 15 16 WHEREAS,the Lower Green River APD is completely surrounded by Urban designated lands and 17 as such is under immense pressure for development and annexation;and• 18 19 WHEREAS,King County and the City of Auburn have signed an interlocal agreement that 20 removes the southern portion of the Lower Green APD out of the city's potential annexation area. 21 THE GROWTH MANAGEMENT PLANNING COUNCIL OF KING COUNTY HEREBY 22 MOVES AS FOLLOWS: 23 . 24 Reaffirm the unanimous vote by this Council on June 16, 1999 to add the following new 25 Countywide Planning Policies: 26 .27 LU-2A Designated Agricultural Production District lands shall not be annexed by 28 cities. 29 30 LU 2B The Lower Green River Agricultural Production District is a regionally 31 designated resource that is to remain in unincorporated King County. 32 • Preservation of the Lower Green River Agricultural Production District will 33 provide an urban separator as surrounding Urban areas are annexed and 34 developed. King County may contract with other jurisdictions to provide 35 some local services to this area as appropriate. • 4 1 14656 1 2 In the event that this motion is ratified by the member jurisdictions of Growth Management 3 Planning Council,then the Interim Potential Annexation Area Map shall be revised 4 accordingly and the Urban Growth Boundary will be drawn around the Lower Green 5 Agricultural Production District(APD)to clarify that the APD is outside of the Urban area. 6 7 ADOPTED by the Growth Management Planning Council of King County on September 26,2001 8 in open session. 9 10 • 11 12 13 • 14 • 15 16 Ron Ims, h ' ,Growth Management Planning Council • 17 • • • • • 1./GMPC/2001GMPC Mo ion01-2.doc — 2 - Metropolitan King County Council Growth Management and Unincorporated Areas Committee Staff Report Agenda Item: 10 Name: Lauren Smith Proposed Ordinance: 2003-0127 Date: March 18, 2003 Attending: Paul Reitenbach, King County DDES Kevin Wright, King County PAO SUBJECT: Proposed Ordinance 2003-0127 adopts amendments to the Countywide Planning Policies addressing the long term protection of Agricultural Production Districts, and ratifies the amended Countywide Planning Policies on behalf of the population of unincorporated King County. BACKGROUND: The Growth Management Planning Council (GMPC) is a formal body comprised of elected officials from King County, Seattle, Bellevue, the Suburban Cities, and Special Districts. The GMPC was created in 1990 in response to a provision in the Washington State Growth Management Act (GMA) requiring cities and counties to work together to adopt Countywide Planning Policies (CPPs). Under GMA, countywide planning policies serve as the framework for each individual jurisdiction's comprehensive plan, and ensure regional consistency with respect to land use planning efforts. The GMPC drafted the CPPs, which were then adopted by the King County Council and ratified by the cities. Changes to the CPPs are recommended by the GMPC, adopted by the King County Council, and ratified by the cities. GMPC Actions In June of 1999, the GMPC adopted Substitute Motion 99-3, recommending amendments to the King County Countywide Planning Policies, as follows: Recommendation#1. Add two new policies addressing the long-term governance of Agricultural Production Districts: LU-2A Designated Agricultural Production Districts shall not be annexed by cities. LU-2B The Lower Green River Valley Agricultural Production District is a regionally designated resource that is to remain in unincorporated King County. Preservation of the Lower Green River Valley Agricultural Production District will provide an urban separator as surrounding urban areas are annexed and developed. King County may contract with other jurisdictions to provide some local services to this area as appropriate. C:\WINDOWS\TEMP12003-0127(CPP Amendments-Lower Green River Valley APDX3.18-03).doc 521/2003 8:51 AM Recommendation #2. Amend the Potential Annexation Area (PAA) Map in the CPPs so that the Lower Green River Valley APD does not appear within the PM boundaries of any ' jurisdiction. Recommendation#3. Amend the Urban Growth Area map by drawing the Urban Growth Area Boundary around the Lower Green River Valley APD., This is to clarify its classification as long- term resource land, and to emphasize that although it is located west of the main urban-rural boundary line, it is not considered urban. King County Council Actions In 1999, the King County Council amended the King County Comprehensive Plan to be consistent with the GMPC recommendations contained in Motion 99-3, by adopting policies R- 513 and R-544 (see below), and by drawing the Urban Growth Area Boundary around the Lower Green River Valley APD (see Attachment 2). R-513 Designated Forest and Agricultural Production District lands shall not be annexed by cities. R-544 The Lower Green River Agricultural Production District is a regionally designated resource that is to remain in unincorporated King County. The Lower Green River Agricultural Production District functions as an urban separator between the cities of Kent and Auburn. King County may contract with other jurisdictions to provide some local services to this area as appropriate. In 2000, the King County Council further amended the King County Comprehensive Plan by adopting Policy R-543,which also supports the GMPC's recommendations in Motion 99-3: R-543 King County commits to preserve Agricultural Production District parcels in or near the Urban Growth Area because of their high production capabilities, their proximity to markets, and their value as open space. Finally, in 2001 the King County Council considered the adoption of Proposed Ordinance 2002- 0256, which would have amended the CPPs consistent with the recommendations of the GMPC and with the changes already made to the King County Comprehensive Plan. However, because the County was engaged in negotiations to purchase certain properties within the Lower Green River Valley APD, and out of concerns that the GMPC had adopted their recommendations in the absence of a quorum and without an adequate public review process, the Council did not adopt the Proposed Ordinance. Instead, the Council adopted Motion 11208 (see Attachment 3), which remanded the GMPC motion back to the GMPC for further review and reconsideration. Motion 11208 also directed the County Executive to complete negotiations with property owners in the Lower Green River Valley APD in the earliest possible timeframe. On September 26, 2001 the GMPC reconsidered its actions with respect to Motion 99-3, and via the adoption of Motion 01-2, reaffirmed those actions. On November 20, 2002 King County executed the fee simple purchase of what is known as the Nelson property in the Lower Green River Valley APD, thus fulfilling the second mandate of Motion 11208. C:\WINDOWS\TEMP\2003-0127(CPP Amendments-Lower Green River Valley APDX3.18.03).doc 5/21/2003 8:51 AM .0100, With these two actions complete, the King County Council is asked to consider once again amending the Countywide Planning Policies as recommended by the GMPC in Motions 99-3 and 01-2. SUMMARY: Proposed Ordinance 2003-0127 would amend the Countywide Planning Policies by: • Adding policies LU-2A and LU-2B addressing the long-term governance of Agricultural Production Districts; • Amending the Interim Potential Annexation Area Map to illustrate that the Lower Green River Valley APD is not within the PM of any jurisdiction; and • Amending the land use map in the CPPs to illustrate that the Lower Green River Valley APD is outside the boundaries of the Urban Growth Area. Additionally, the ordinance would ratify the changes on behalf of the population of unincorporated King County, as required by Countywide Planning Policy FW-1. Amendments to the Countywide Planning Policies become effective when ratified by ordinance or resolution by at least 30% of the city and county governments representing 70% of the population of King County according to the Interlocal agreement. A city shall be deemed to have ratified the countywide planning policy unless, within 90 days of adoption by King County, the city by legislative action disapproves the Countywide Planning Policy. ATTACHMENTS: 1. Proposed Ordinance 2003-0127,with attachments 2. Map: Lower Green River Valley Agricultural Production District 3. King County Motion 11208, Adopted May 21, 2000 C:\WINDOWS\TEMP\2003-0127(CPP Amendments-Lower Green River Valley APDX3-18-03).doc 5/21f2003 8:51 AM DRAFt CITY OF RENTON,WASHINGTON RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON, RATIFYING AMENDMENTS TO THE COUNTYWIDE PLANNING POLICIES WHEREAS, the Growth Management Act, RCW 36.70A. 210 mandates the development and adoption of Countywide Planning Policies for King County, and WHEREAS, the King County, the City of Seattle, the City of Bellevue and the Suburban Cities of King County have met jointly as the Growth Management Planning Council (GMPC)to develop and recommend Countywide Planning Policies; and WHEREAS, the City of Renton has ratified the Countywide Planning Policies and subsequent amendments, and WHEREAS, Countywide Planning Policy FW-1 Step 9 provides for an amendment process to change the Planning Policies as may be necessary from time to time, and WHEREAS, the amendment process requires ratification of proposed amendments by at least 30 percent of the City and County governments representing 70 percent of the population in King County, and WHEREAS, the City participated in study sessions with the GMPC and reviewed the final amendments prior to adoption by the GMPC, and WHEREAS, the Planning and Development Committee of the City Council reviewed the proposed amendments June 5 and September 12, 2002, and August 7, 2003, as they pertain to the Renton Comprehensive Plan, RESOLUTION NO. NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON,DO RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS: SECTION I. The above findings are true and correct in all respects. SECTION II. The proposed amendments to the Countywide Planning Policies are consistent with the adopted City Comprehensive Plan and the adopted City Business Plan. SECTION III. The best interests and general welfare of the City of Renton would be served by ratification of the following amendments approved by the King County Council and the Growth Management Planning Council: a) Ordinance 2003-0123 (GMPC Motion 02-4) adding a new policy to support ongoing water supply planning, b) Ordinance 2003-0124 (GMPC Motions 02-1, 02-2 and 02-3) adopting new household and employment targets for the period 2001-2022, c) Ordinance 2003-0125 (GMPC Motion 02-5) amending the Urban Separator map to reflect negotiated modifications to the Renton Urban Separator, d) Ordinance 2003-0126 (GMPC Motion 02-6) designating Totem Lake as an Urban Center, and e) Ordinance 2003-0127 (GMPC Motion 01-2) addressing the long-term protection of Agricultural Production Districts, described in Exhibit "A" attached hereto and incorporated by reference as if fully set forth. PASSED BY THE CITY COUNCIL this day of , 2003. 2 RESOLUTION NO. Bonnie I.Walton, City Clerk APPROVED BY THE MAYOR this day of , 2002. Jesse Tanner,Mayor Approved as to form: Lawrence J. Warren, City Attorney 3 ;y CITZ,, F RENTON 1/4z- Nyz Office of the City Attorney Jesse Tanner,Mayor Lawrence J.Warren MEMORANDUM To: /Mayor Jesse Tanner Council President Bob Edwards From: Lawrence J. Warren, City Attorney Date: March 31, 1998 Subject: Regional Finance and Governance Plan I have spoken with each of you, recently, about this topic, and authored a memo dated March 30, 1998 suggesting a language addition to the proposed agreement concerning Regional Finance and Governance. I have now been asked by the Mayor to review the authority of the various parties to enter into such an agreement. As I understand the facts, the Growth Management Planning Council (GMPC) is the body generating the proposed agreement on Regional Finance and Governance. Pursuant to the contract forming the GMPC, it is to generate a Countywide Planning Policy (CPP) through interaction between three constituencies, the City of Seattle which has 3 votes, Suburban Cities with six members having 3 votes, and King County having 6 votes. The GMPC was to serve until it completed its duties or July 1, 1992, whichever occurs first unless extended by agreement. The agreement forming the GMPC was to be a complete expression of the terms and there was to be no oral representations or understandings not incorporated within the agreement. The GMPC end product is a Countywide Planning Policy which is deemed ratified when approved by at least 30% of the city and county governments representing 70% of the population of King County. It is also my understanding that the GMPC believes that Substitute Senate Bill 5038 (SSB 5038) can be engrafted onto the GMPC contract. SSB 5038 basically permits agreement for provision of services and reallocation of taxes for those services between county, city and special district service providers. Any such agreement would be effective when approved by the county legislative authority and the governing body or bodies of at least a simple majority of the total number of cities included within the geographical area covered by the agreement, which cities include at least 75% of the population included within that territory. The participants may agree to another approval methodology. SUBURBAN CITIES. As previously stated Suburban Cities have six members on the GMPC exercising 3 votes. These 3 votes are to reflect the position of the Suburban Cities. Pursuant to Article 2, section 1 of the Suburban Cities Association Bylaws, the Suburban Cities Association is to act as a spokesperson, with the concurrence of the majority of the member cities and towns when engaged in regional affairs and policy discussions with King County. I am unaware as to whether or not Post Office Box 626 - 100 S. 2nd Street - Renton, Washington 98057 - (425)255-8678 7 03/31/98 Nor, Page 2 such concurrence was obtained before the Suburban City representatives voted on behalf of the Suburban Cities. If not, then I believe obtaining such concurrence is a necessary prerequisite to the validity of those votes. GMPC AUTHORITY. The agreement forming the GMPC was signed by the City of Renton in December of 1991. It specifically authorized the GMPC to adopt a Countywide Planning Policy which would be recommended to the King County Council for adoption. In order for the proposed agreement for Regional Finance and Governance to be an appropriate topic for consideration by the GMPC it must fall within a definition of the Countywide Planning Policy. While I note that the proposed motion relating to the Regional Finance and Governance Plan indicates that the Regional Finance and Governance Plan, as described in CPPs FW-37, 38 and 39, seeks to address the fiscal impacts of implementing the Countywide Planning Policies, and that amendments to the CPPs have been prepared to address process and schedule issues of establishing potential annexation areas, that does not mean that the Regional Finance and Governance Plan is, itself, a CPP, or that the GMPC has the authority to adopt the Regional Finance and Governance Plan. As I understand it, the CPPs are aspirational, and one could read the Regional Finance and Governance Plan as being compulsory (hence the suggested language in my memo to you of March 30, 1998). I have significant questions as to whether or not the GMPC has the authority to draft, accept, circulate and recommend the adoption of the Regional Finance and Governance Plan. However, if the necessary governmental bodies accede to this procedure and enter into the contract, that objection would probably be deemed waived. If there is going to be an objection, it needs to be made before the various government bodies enter into the agreement. SSB 5038. I have reviewed SSB 5038 and must admit to being somewhat confused by its terms. It appears to authorize various governments to engage in a collective negotiation process relating to the provision of governmental service and reallocation of certain tax revenues. However, section 4, subsection 3, allows a service agreement to be effective when approved by the county government and the governing bodies of at least a simple majority of the total number of cities included within the territory covered by the agreement, which cities include at least 75% of the total population of the cities within that geographic area, or such other formula as may be agreed to by the participants. What this means to me is that the City can agree to bargain, but if it does not wish to enter into the ultimate proposal, it can be compelled to enter into this contract despite its objections. While I have not had the opportunity to extensively analyze this legislation, I am struck by the proposition that the City may not agree to enter into a contract, and yet may be forced to do so. Fundamental to the contracting process is mutual assent to the contract. I am not sure the cities' individual contract rights can be submerged into the collective will of a larger whole. Additionally, I have not been provided with any documents which would indicate that the participants in the GMPC have agreed to use the ratification process under the GMPC rather than the ratification process set forth in SSB 5038. Admittedly, I have not had an opportunity to review 03/31/98 N✓ Page 3 all of the documents and am authoring this memo under a very tight time constraint. There may be documents that would satisfy my concerns on this issue. VOTER DISENFRANCHISEMENT. I am left with an additional concern for which I have not had time to undertake complete legal research. However, if I understand the Regional Finance and Governance Plan, a resident of King County could be required to accept his or her public services from a city, have that city establish the rates for provision of the governmental service, and yet not vote for the City Council members. This issue is somewhat different than the provision of utilities outside a city boundary because the acceptance of those utilities is generally a voluntary act, and what I am speaking of now would be involuntary. I have not had an opportunity to conduct my legal research on this issue, but I do recall a case or cases that found a constitutional problem with an arrangement whereby a party could be forced to accept fee based governmental services without a right to vote for the elected representatives establishing those fees. Before the city provides any services outside its city boundary on a compulsory basis, I would like the chance to undertake additional legal research on this topic. CONCLUSION. At the Mayor's request I have performed a very quick analysis of the various documents involved in and leading up to the draft Regional Finance and Governance Plan. A number of questions have occurred to me. Because of the short time frame in which this memo is being authored, I have not had an opportunity to extensively review the various documents or the legal precedents. There may be other documents available that will answer most, or all, of my questions. However, I believe these questions need to be carefully reviewed in light of the importance of the Regional Finance and Governance Plan and the latent ambiguities contained within that Plan as addressed in my memo of March 30, 1998. If I can answer any further questions for you please let me know. Lawrence J. Wa ren LJW:as. A8:139.23. *400 March 3. 1997 Renton City Council Minutes Page 67 Mr. Zimmerman replied that the City uses the formula contained in King County's design manual for storm water detention systems required for private development projects. He assured Council that it is a fairly sophisticated formula which takes into account soil types both before and after construction. Regarding Mr. Gardin's drainage problem, Mr. Zimmerman said it is caused by a series of ground water springs existing in the hillside. When the hill becomes oversaturated due to heavy rains, the water tries to find a way to the surface. Mr. Zimmerman emphasized this is a naturally-occurring situation, and one not altogether surprising considering that Renton's median rainfall is 38 inches, but the City received 58 inches of rain in 1996. He concluded that this situation is not necessarily related to new development. Mayor Tanner added that the solution is for Mr. Gardin to install a French drain on his property to funnel the water to a storm sewer facility. CONSENT AGENDA Items on the consent agenda are adopted by one motion which follows the listing. Vacation: SW 12th & 13th City Clerk submitted petition for vacation of a portion of SW 12th St., a full Sts (Scarff/VAC-97-001) vacation of SW 13th St., and vacation of the alley between SW 12th and 13th Sts. in the Automall area; petition filed on 1/31/97 by Michael Scarff, 23292 - 160th Ave. SE, Kent, 98042, representing seven abutting property owners (VAC-97-OOI). Refer to Board of Public Works; set a public hearing on 3/24/97 to consider the vacation request. (See page 69 for resolution setting the public hearing.) CAG: 97-, Planning & Technical Services Division recommended approval of a proposed Photogrammetric Mapping consultant agreement in the amount of $114,855.00 with Walker & Associates, Project (Phase II), Walker Inc., for Phase II of the Photogrammetric Mapping of Renton and Environs & Associates project. Refer to Planning & Development Committee. Planning: King County "4 Planning & Technical Services Division requested acceptance of 20 acres to 1" Program, Ruth owned by Jerry Ruth, located south of SE 204th Way and north of SE 208th Property (SE 204th & St. between 132nd and 140th Avenues SE, into King County's "4 to 1" 132nd) program. The proposal would require Renton to ratify an amendment to the \ ttai\ hcokatbsvectlif urban growth boundary, if adopted by the King County Council, and subsequent joint City and County review of any development on the property. Refer to Planning & Development Committee. CAG: 97-, Memorandum Surface Water Utility Division requested approval of proposed Memorandum of Agreement for Seattle of Agreement with the City of Seattle and King County for the Seattle Masonry Dam Operations Masonry Dam Operations study to enhance flood control, assure power Study, Seattle and King generation, and improve water supply for both instream and consumptive use. County Renton's cost share of the study is $15,000. Refer to Utilities Committee. Airport: Airborne Transportation Division recommended approval of addendum to PAG-94-005, Aviation Operating Airborne Aviation's operating agreement, to specify procedures for the Agreement Addendum, departure and arrival of Airborne's helicopters that will eliminate mid-field PAG-94-005 approaches and departures over 6th Ave., and short approaches and departures over Airport Way. Refer to Transportation (Aviation) Committee. CAG: 94-117, P- Channel Utility Systems Division submitted CAG-94-117, P-1 Channel (Springbrook (Springbrook Creek), Golf Creek) project; and requested unilateral approval of the project, authorization Landscaping for final pay estimate in the amount of $20,512.56, commencement of 60-day CITY OF RENTON COUNCIL AGENDA BILL AI#: ? G • Submitting Data: Planning/Building/Public Works For Agenda of Dept./Div/Board.. Planning and Technical Services March 3, 1997 Staff Contact. Mike Kattermann Agenda Status Consent. X Subject: Public Hearing... King County Proposal Redesignate and Rezone 4 Rural Acres to Correspondence.. Urban Land Use Designation and R-6-P zone as part of the King Ordinance County "4 to 1" Program. Resolution Old Business Exhibits: New Business Issue Paper Study Sessions Planning Commission Recommendation Information Recommended Action: Approvals: Refer to the Planning and Development Committee Legal Dept. Finance Dept Other Fiscal Impact: Expenditure Required... NA Transfer/Amendment Amount Budgeted NA Revenue Generated Total Project Budget City Share Total Project.. Summary of Action: The proposal is to accept the 20 acre Jerry Ruth property into the King County "4 to 1" Program. This program allows amendments to the Urban Growth Boundary provided that four acres of open space are dedicated to King County for every one acre of land that receives an Urban Land Use designation. The program criteria require consultation with cities where the subject property is adjacent to a City boundary. In the Ruth"4 to 1"proposal, 4 acres would become Urban with R-6-P King County zoning,while 16 acres would be retained in the Rural designation and be preserved as open space. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: 1)Support inclusion of the Ruth proposal in the"4 to 1"program,2) Support the proposed re-designation of 4 acres to Urban with R-6-P zoning, 3)Request that the formal amendment to the urban growth boundary, if adopted by the County Council,be referred back to Renton for ratification in the 1998 Comprehensive Plan Amendment cycle, and 4) Request joint City/County review of subsequent development. Planning/Amend97Ruth/ 1 ` `400 CITY OF RENTON PLANNINGBUILDING/PUBLIC WORKS MEMORANDUM DATE: February 20, 1997 TO: Kathy Keolker-Wheeler,President Members of the Renton City Council VIA: Jesse Tanner, Mayor FROM: Gregg Zimmerman,Administrator & . STAFF CONTACT: Mike Kattermann SUBJECT: King County Proposal to Re-designate and Rezone 4 Rural Acres to R-6P- Jerry Ruth Property IS SUE: King County is considering a proposal to amend the Urban Growth Area boundary with respect to the Jerry Ruth"4 to 1"proposal. The subject proposal is twenty(20)acres in size and currently is zoned RA-5-P, Rural Area, one dwelling unit per five(5)acres. The property is located south of SE 204th Way,north of SE 208th St. between 132nd Ave. SE and 140th Ave. SE. (see Attachment 1,Map). There are two issues that the City needs to consider should this proposal be approved by the County in 1997. • Should the City support inclusion of the Ruth proposal in the County's "4 to 1"program resulting in an extension of the Urban Growth Boundary to include four(4)acres of the subject(20 acre) property? • Should the City support the proposed rezoning of the subject site from a rural area RA-5-P designation to residential urban R-6P zoning designation? RECOMMENDATION: (Planning Commission and staff concur) • Support inclusion of the Ruth proposal in the"4 to 1"program. (See Attachment 2, Proposal Description). • Support the proposed re-designation of the proposed four(4) acre portion of the twenty (20) acre Ruth property to an Urban land use designation with R-6P zoning. • Request that the formal amendment of the urban growth boundary, if adopted by the County Council, be referred back to Renton for inclusion in the 1998 Comprehensive Plan amendment cycle • Request that subsequent development on the four(4)acre Ruth"4 to 1"site be reviewed jointly by the City of Renton and King County noting areas of concern including,but not limited to, ingress February 20, 1997 Page 2 and egress for the site noting potential roadway alignment conflicts with the Forest Glen South subdivision across SE 204th Way to the north and limited sight distances along SE 204th Way. BACKGROUND SUMMARY: Inclusion of the subject property in the"4 to 1"program would appear to comply with the program criteria: • Achieve a balance between the economic vitality of the region and the protection of public open space; • Create a contiguous permanent buffer of quality open space between urban and rural lands for current and future generations to appreciate and enjoy; ensure urban quality through preserving a compact urban pattern and securing the ability to provide urban services; • Promote development of affordable housing through increased incentives; • Forge working public/private partnerships with property owners along the UGA boundary;and • Consult with cities where applications are adjacent to city boundaries. County staff report that the proposal is consistent with King County Comp Plan Policy I-204 (see Urban Rural Greenway Fact Sheet Attachment 3). The proposed urban land is physically contiguous to the UGA boundary and water, sewer infrastructure is located across the street. The sixteen(16) acre open space portion which is proposed as permanent open space is configured to connect with open space in Soos Creek Park that abuts the site to the west. Renton Comprehensive Plan Policy LU-381 provides guidance in establishing the Urban Growth Area line. Staff and the Planning Commission reviewed the subject proposal and found it consistent with Policy LU-381 with respect to location of environmentally sensitive areas, desired density of development, utilization of infrastructure, and identification of community separators. CONCLUSION: The Ruth"4 to 1"proposal is consistent with King County Comp Plan policies,the majority of criteria identified in the"4 to 1"program and the Renton Comprehensive Plan . The proposed zoning classification, R-6P, is also consistent with the City's R-8 zoning and Single Family Land Use Designation. The area was included in Renton's original Single Family Land Use Designation proposed for the Comprehensive Plan in 1993 (See Figure 4). In supporting this proposed amendment to the King County Comprehensive Plan,the City requests that King County confer with Renton at the time a specific development proposal is submitted for the subject site. King County Comp Plan Policy I-210, for example, states that jurisdictions, including King County should provide reciprocal notification to cities of development proposals in the PAAs. cc: Jay Covington City Clerk Planning//Amend 97/Ruth3 'rrrr ATTACHMENT 2 MGday f� RUTH 4 TO 1 PROPOSAL SUMMARY Property Owner/Applicant: Jerry Ruth Address: 18428 42nd Avenue South Seattle, WA 98188 Parcel Number: 0322059024 Community Planning Area: Soos Creek Surface Water Management Basin: Soos Creek Total Acreage: 20 Current Zoning: RA-5P Summary of Proposal: If recommended for approval: Redesignate and rezone 4 rural acres to an urban land use designation and R-6P zone. The remaining rural land(16 acres)would be conveyed to King County as permanent public open space upon final plat approval as directed by Countywide Planning Policy FW-1,Step 7a and King County Comprehensive Plan Policies I-204a and I-205. See attached map for the configuration of the proposed urban and open space land. PROPERTY DESCRIPTION Location: • Property is on the south side of SE Lake Youngs Way between 140th Avenue SE and 136th Avenue SE. in Section 3,Township 22 North,Range 5 East. See attached map. Surrounding land use: • North of the site,within the UGA, is an urban residential neighborhood called Forest Glen South, zoned R-6P; • East and south of the site,adjacent to the proposed open space, are larger lot single family lots zoned RA-5P and RA-2.5P; • West of the site is open space which is part of the Soos Creek Park and trail system. Property development: . • Property is undeveloped. - Wetlands: • King County Sensitive Areas Folio shows no wetlands on the property. • No wetland assessment has been conducted on the site. • A portion of the proposed open space supports plants which are typically associated with seasonal emergent wetlands. Streams: • King County Sensitive Areas Folio indicates the presence of a class 2 stream with salmonids, International Creek,which traverses the southern portion of the site within the proposed open space and connects to Soos Creek to the west. Ruth 4 to 1 Proposal 11/4/96 Page 1 lose (i) King County has consulted with the City of Renton. (j) Not applicable. (k) This proposal has been evaluated based on these criteria, including: • Open space will provide protection for class 2 stream with salmonids; • Open space will provide increased wildlife habitat contiguous to Soos Creek Park; • Urban facilities and services are within close proximity to the proposed urban land. (1) Not applicable. (m) Not applicable. (n) This proposal, if approved,shall be subject to the same growth phasing policies applicable to all other urban development. (o) There is not a contiguous band of publicly dedicated open space along the Urban Growth Area adjacent to the proposed urban area of this proposal. ISSUES Title Report: A title report is being conducted for this property. ' Environmental Assessment: An environmental assessment is being conducted for this property. Recorded Easements: To be determined following review of Title Report. SUMMARY • 16 acres of open space: Connects to existing public open space within Soos Creek Park; Provides increased protection to Soos Creek and protects International Creek stream corridor; Protects emergent wetlands associated with International Creek. 4 acres of urban land: • Legal access available; Water and sewer within close proximity; Proposed zoning is consistent with zoning directly to north across SE Lk.Youngs Way; Proposed urban land does not include any wetlands or other sensitive areas. RECOMMENDATION No final recommendation for amendment to Land Use and Zoning Map has been proposed pending IRT review. Ruth 4 to 1 Proposal 11/4/96 Page 3 ,, .10 ATTACHMENT 3 . Now URBAN/RURAL GREENWAY: KING COUNTY 4 TO 1 PROGRAM King County Comprehensive Plan Policies 1-204 and 1-205 Adopted 1994 The Four to One Program -Amending the Urban Growth Area to Achieve Open Space. The Countywide Planning Policies (Policy FW-1, step 7) establish a program to actively pursue dedication of open space along the Urban Growth Area line to create a contiguous band of open space north and south along the UGA. Changes to the Urban Growth Area through this program will need to be processed as Land Use Map Amendments. This program implements Growth Management Act goals to reduce sprawl and to encourage retention of open space. 1-204 King County shall actively pursue dedication of open space north and south along the Urban Growth Area. a. Rural Area land, excluding agriculturally zoned land, may be added to the Urban Growth Area only in exchange for a dedication of permanent open space to the King County Open Space System. The dedication shall consist of a minimum of four acres of open space for every one acre of land added to the Urban Growth Area calculated in gross acres. The open space shall be dedicated at the time the application is approved; b. Land added under this policy to the Urban Growth Area adopted in the Countywide Planning Policies and the King County Comprehensive Plan shall be physically contiguous to the existing Urban Growth Area and must be able to be served by sewers and other urban services; c. The total area added to the Urban Growth Area as a result of this policy shall not exceed 4,000 acres; d. Development of the land added to the Urban Growth Area under this policy shall be limited to residential development and shall be at a minimum density of four dwelling units per acre. Proposals shall meet the urban density and affordable housing policies of this Comprehensive Plan; e. Open space areas shall retain their rural area designations and should generally be configured in such a way as to connect with open space on adjacent properties. Open space areas should generally parallel the Urban Growth Area line, but the criteria set forth in 1-204(k) below shall be controlling; f. The minimum depth of the open space buffer between the proposed addition to the Urban Growth Area and the Rural Area shall be at least one-half of the property width; g. The minimum size of property to be considered will be 20 acres, which includes both the proposed addition to the Urban Growth Area and land proposed for o. Where a contiguous band of publicly dedicated open space currently exists along the Urban Growth Area line, the above program shall not be utilized. p. The open space acquired through this program shall be considered as natural areas or passive recreation sites. The following additional uses may be allowed only if located on a small portion of the open space and are found to be compatible with the site's open space values and functions such as those listed in 1-204(k): 1. trails; 2. natural appearing stormwater facilities; 3. compensatory mitigation of wetland losses on the urban designated portion of the project, consistent with the King County Comprehensive Plan and the Sensitive Areas Ordinance; and 4. active recreation uses which are compatible with the functions and values of the open space and are necessary to provide limited, low intensity recreational opportunities (such as mowed meadows) for the adjacent Urban Area provided that: the active recreation is as near as possible based on site conditions to the Urban Growth Area; the physical characteristics of the site, such as topography, soils and hydrology are suitable for development of active facilities; the active recreation area does not exceed five percent of the total open space acreage; and provided that no roads, parking, or sanitary facilities are permitted. Development for active recreation allowed in the open space may not be used to satisfy the active recreation requirements in K.C.C.21 A. 1-205 King County shall amend the Urban Growth Area to add rural lands to the UGA consistent with policy 1-204. Comprehensive Plan Map amendments pursuant to this policy shall occur each year as part of the annual review of the Plan, and shall consist of a rural to urban redesignation and a reclassification to an urban residential zone. Detailed site suitability and development conditions for both the urban and open space portions of the proposal shall be established through the preliminary format plat approval process. Open space dedication shall occur at final format plat approval. If the applicant fails to actively pursue and receive preliminary format plat approval, during a reasonable period of time, the urban and open space properties shall convert to a rural designation and rural zone classification during the next yearly review of the King County Comprehensive Plan. .-....___ .•1-"4:4__l7.Lil__6..r.___Jaxt_—i..r.__..�_.___----_-.___..__. ._.--_ • 1410, ATTACHMENT 4 ' • • ,,\L.NOVSE\IWU-Bw Onp c._:2/ !' 7C 1 - I D + .rrf•F�� 1/.� s. + ' : ; ::: r;x;r• • .. ..:::;..:.;• .S:w; - „cam:``` s' f'' ' I. I {a \. A �•••• • +v•i,•: { l , fir( A \Y.:_,- .�..,.t-, \ ,y,+ ,W' eri',:r� EFk':' vrl� •, ,-. -r— ---- - I r. 71 1� }��v^} i� [ . 1!J . tom •-. ' 0 1 ?} y ,•r..,v., ♦♦tV r f r.' • ,}"ram ur l :::4,,,-..,..., v. — '� < KY41♦♦ ,°°°„ � t 1 ems, a, � •1 l ��."X,- :'<�: �, \ 1�: : ' rr 1 a 4•: `rr : 4l 1 •—./' "'`1'}.#t •1.},•} 1rrf . v/f.�i:k a:�KK}3��.,;��%.n� ���{ '.S� rya ib:}i' n ? . t r � +�,.; �� ▪ — :r,♦-A• .: :�7. " . _�'.•. jr; �ri {.� .:°�. ' .y: .i}} 14. ?. :� A ,':}�?:\`v�'}: •`•-; -1. ¢{ : - •r?•:: t":iiir,•I<•:.4 :}:•.;r.'.•:r.r;,f •:• .�;:1 .♦ • .. " ,:Y' {: ,�4 '•' r{.. ..:,.itf1.i a! v, • )r,;: r.r:yr• } .:.}` }�.' r :rj'. { .{'r, r{da',v<• I\\r� I'�f'ti , :, F l.•T ,':•r..n..{:•:::.{.. lt\\ v�,,,� '.:r•k • .?,•r{n .. ♦ •t• � 17 r '00 r 4 f•�:%ti• r.:•::: '3::.. :, -410:1 ;:}�'.L + <<'•' •• •,. �,•�:•�� 1, 3♦�,/�: ♦• r}� i{:ti•.: r::r� ';g+;.rS "{i'\ r{:.}::}• i::: ' :} ? 'ro,.• v? '}� cam{ ♦♦ ♦ y r.11i.l ::'•�:}.f i{ ¢ y:h. {vr{.i .„: i f f .:4,........,____J }?S••6a C,{:° '�y�"�.,�f� r i{:;:°} { r ♦ qt:s { •4Sr S 3 M. Zv s'' Gti I {•.: .:k: t}}p., .•,: +♦+ O :.•;;,.. : !Isis'• xt".+u., ti v y r'♦' . .A:'r:r :::f i q ,.,sk• •r,,+'t. :}? .♦1� Y•, it . •...• rn '�,y�}"e��XMO},C ` !• '��'t{+..{;yv,:•'.•'�1 ♦ ♦°4♦f ?`' �i•;'•.;�:t. �1�4 J. a r I r : `:}; o• :r+:::',YA •,°,v ♦� ..—V• fiX 1 r . * n2's r s4.�'_.•+�::::: ::,.♦'♦.♦±♦. ♦w4 ♦{::<:"4g♦♦�♦�•►♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦ ♦ ♦♦♦ ♦:: •• stti •...',,,,:ile. 4.-am.:,.:,...::,.:.:, :--.,'::'.....-:,:(0.__:.:::;.::.:3.v_,..,,,:t. ,..- -1,,,ft.,%,:it,,,a,. ÷ ! . - rid- it J P ' $N{V � / LJ IC 3 I 4 A • k `:".0.:`{ L-- / h / -- !� r 9rHrQY I ,� 4y3 is 'V 1 )• � I /D _ I x. . Ell 1111 ..;i ' . 45. 0:4 . •. t--4 0 c) 1 N 0 iti .:::::::. -.::., Till -71 44 M M ....... a . 0 ',":43 r y` ti o n rt t=i r,1 o 2: n f) M :n w c O ' N 3. $ O "tjnO ^ 0 o c0i D n, O , N _-'' a o Z. O 7 7 7 P1 a G `a C1 n G - — '4 .. O ~ a F' G 0 .- co o rt ar nnn n , w04 • 7 rn a tri7i CO O w �' a o r n r Z v 4. ° _ }-7l lid n y 0 F. n I h�1 p -ni • N o �'' n • 'G (n F� '7 I{+ cr 5.? _ \ }y/ C O m O 0 L, 04, + 0 h t . , Niime CITY OF RENTON MEMORANDUM I DATE: February 20, 1997 TO: City Council Mayor Tanner FROM: Eugene Ledbury PLANNNG COMMISSION SUBJECT: Ruth "4 to 1" Referral from King County RECOMMENDED ACTION: 1) Support inclusion of the Ruth proposal in the "4 to 1" program, 2) Support the proposed re-designation of 4 acres to Urban with R-6-P zoning, 3) Request that the formal amendment to the urban growth boundary, if adopted by the County Council, be referred back to Renton for ratification in the 1998 Comprehensive Plan Amendment cycle, and 4) Request joint City/County review of subsequent development. The Planning Commission recommends that King County confer with Renton at the time a specific development proposal is submitted for the subject site. Issues that should be addressed are the proposed alignment of the entry streets vis-à-vis those of Forest Glen South subdivision to the north across SE 204th and sight/distance of vehicular access points off this community arterial. Planning Commission Action and Recommendation To support the staff recommendation as proposed. For: Brosman, Franklin, Lukins, Mehrens, Smith Against: None Absent: Wagner (-2 Signed ene Ledbury anning Commission Chair h:\divs\p&ts\phi\pc\Ruth2 ATTACHMENT 1 , I i ii-romp ig 1 y4%w --A) . 141 - ar 1.111111L 0111011111Weili,„1, vivoill AA .\, * ...Ipso: ....1,.. , i \ oiliwa, II \ \_ I��Ili♦ ��ri► :. lge ii," i _____, .....,„,„,,,. ui , lki ■ _ _ , iiiinii,„,...... ..„.,..__ Er," -:Nonsiliniiiiiiiiii. wow .IPPoliimil 1 IN i -4:iiii::11::.: smainemoss es•a...sr•1..,. of:„:.; ...=' MI 0 :::::T.4::m1:::::4,1-ki.-;;;;;11:::,:kliorff, Aran , ,....„„„,„... , .. .::::::::•::::::::::::••:"..•:•:••:•••• •"..'...•WZ.: 6/.14°11. 4:17112 ni A 111. . ..:::::..: ...:„.„„:„.......: __,::„.„- ...,,,:o. , war. r.' Y:;:•.• "Niiiiii::::*:*iE§: EEiEiiiEl.:IiilEiiq'- � NNW i 1 I* ::::::::* IC: 1 icT,, SE 2 8th St ; ±_:: p111 _ : Zoned .**: . : is RA-5 N CD CL m �_ .• :;: �, ;:zp:::::::.: b0 ---/ *E:iiig:E:::,:::::***::::: ;if 11liillhlllt 3411112 i.11�iiii i:I II!lluIiii'iiIIiI i iriliIfIU) __. Proposed Urban Land Rut h //Arterials 4 to 1 Pro osal `-''-Streams p Wetlands Ras Ruth Property 11111 The Dtpernesi ofNaueal R4ttIIttS,Water Pollution antral disda nt; Lakes wry wattarYyfahseofdhis digital p and ecinctbeythatfawhichtWPIS& ed. . ® County x f:::.• Parks Neither this dgitfl product nor any prnhm thereof mty be tepod<red it any form or by any Hearts withal the eeaae written afhorUation of the Dgmhtsnt of Nat.ali Resources, n waterrol tionControl 'Ili,do« atvrludes_nacopyrighted w . 4 Urban Growth Areas by the Kroll Map C«tpany and is being teed with tmapemissin Use istestmtea 0.046 0 0.046 0.092 miles s I 41 We CITY RENTON Mayor Earl Clymer AE CE VED June 20, 1995 .JL!ti 2 I 1995 v i Uw vi l Y GUuiVuIL The Honorable Gary Locke Committee Chair, Growth Management Planning Council 400 King County Courthouse 516 3rd AVE Seattle, WA 98104-3271 Re: Amending County-wide Planning Policies to Reflect Adoption of 1987 Wetlands Delineation Manual Dear Chairman Locke: At its meeting June 19th, the Renton City Council officially adopted the 1987 Wetlands Delineation Manual of the Army Corps of Engineers as the reference standards to our City's wetlands ordinance. We had previously adopted the 1989 manual per county-wide planning policy directives, however, as you know, the State legislature adopted legislation this session that called for all local governments to use the 1987 manual. This letter is a formal request that the Growth Management Planning Council amend the county-wide planning policies to reflect the adoption of the 1987 Wetlands Delineation Manual as the standard to which local governments should adhere, thus bringing the County and local governments into conformance with recently adopted state law. Sincerely, Earl Clymer Mayoi cc: Bob Edwards, GMPC member Lynda Ring, SCA Executive Director Renton City Council File:g187mai,i ')t)11 MiH Avenue South - Renton, Washington 98055 - (206)235-2580 / FAX(206)235-2532 CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON RESOLUTION NO. 3094 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON, RATIFYING THE PHASE II AMENDMENTS TO THE COUNTY-WIDE PLANNING POLICIES ADOPTED BY KING COUNTY ON JULY 19, 1994 PURSUANT TO THE GROWTH MANAGEMENT ACT, RCW 36.70A.210. WHEREAS, the County-Wide Planning Policies, adopted by the King County Council on July 6, 1992 and subsequently ratified by the City of Renton through Resolution No. 2922, establish a County- Wide framework for the development of city and county Comprehensive Plans as required by the Growth Management Act, RCW 36 . 70A; and WHEREAS, the County-Wide Planning Policies and the City of Renton identified additional policies and issues to be addressed through Phase II amendments to the County-Wide Planning Policies; and WHEREAS, the Growth Management Planning Council (GMPC) , after deliberation, including public workshops and hearings, adopted and recommended the Phase II amendments to the County-Wide Planning Policies to the King County Council; and WHEREAS, the King County Council enacted Ordinance No . 11446 adopting and ratifying the Phase II amendments to the County-Wide Planning Policies and setting up a process for ratification of the amended policies by the cities, and completion of additional work to refine and amend the County-Wide Planning Policies; and WHEREAS, the County-Wide Planning Policies provide for the coordination and regulation of public and private development within and between jurisdictions in King County; NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON, DO RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS : • RESOLUTION NO. 3094 SECTION I. The above recitals are found to be true and correct in all respects . SECTION II. The City of Renton hereby ratifies the Phase II amendments to the County-Wide Planning Policies as recommended by the GMPC, subject to the provisions identified in King County Ordinance No. 11446 . SECTION III. The following County-Wide policies and issues are of concern to the City of Renton and will require further resolution. The City of Renton supports the following positions on these policies and issues : A. The City of Renton continues to support locally determined growth targets and will continue to work with King County to refine methodologies used to establish jurisdictional growth targets . B. The City of Renton strongly supports inclusion of the Jones Road Joint Planning Area within the Urban Growth Boundary. C. The City of Renton requests representation on the Regional Finance Forum. SECTION IV. The City of Renton will continue to work with King County and other city staffs and elected officials to resolve these issues in a timely manner and to assure that the city ' s Comprehensive Plan is prepared consistent with the County-Wide Planning Policies . PASSED BY THE CITY COUNCIL this 21st day of November , 1994 . Y;?-) Marilyn etersen, City Clerk 2 Now •amor r RESOLUTION NO. 3094 APPROVED BY THE MAYOR this 21st day of November 1994 . (6ik _ Earl Clymer, Ma or Approved. as to form: Lawre _ce J. Warden, City Attorney RES.412 : 11/15/94 :as . 3 November 21, 1994 Renton City Council Minutes - Page 484 BY NELSON, COUNCIL CONCUR IN THE COMMITTEE REPORT. CARRIED. (See later this page for resolution.) Streets: Arterial Street Transportation (Aviation) Committee Chair Edwards presented a report Classifications, WSDOT recommending that the referral relating to review of arterial street classifications be reported out of Committee with no further action required by the Committee or Council on this matter. This item was being held in Committee so that the City could respond quickly if any disagreements arose during a state-wide review process of arterial street classifications that was being performed by the Washington State Department of Transportation (WSDOT) as required under the federal Intermodal Surface Transportation Efficiency Act (ISTEA). The Transportation Systems Division reports that the City's recommendations for arterial classifications have been adopted by WSDOT and included in the federal aid system. MOVED BY EDWARDS, SECONDED BY SCHLITZER, COUNCIL CONCUR IN THE COMMITTEE REPORT. CARRIED. CAG: 94-, Shuttle Study Transportation (Aviation) Committee Chair Edwards presented a report Consultant, Parsons recommending that Council authorize the Mayor and City Clerk to sign a Brinckerhoff et al contract with Parsons Brinckerhoff Quade & Douglas to complete a study that identifies alternatives and an action plan for implementing a transit shuttle within the City of Renton. Most of the funding for this project comes from an agreement with WSDOT to provide $80,000 in federal funds. The City will provide $20,000 in matching funds from TIP project #9, the Intracity Intermodal Transit Program. MOVED BY EDWARDS, SECONDED BY NELSON, COUNCIL CONCUR IN THE COMMITTEE REPORT. CARRIED. Finance Committee Finance Committee Member Schlitzer presented a report recommending Finance: Limited Term approval of $980,000 in Limited General Obligation Debt to purchase General Obligation Bonds equipment approved in the 1994 budget and anticipated in the 1995 budget. MOVED BY EDWARDS, SECONDED BY SCHLITZER, COUNCIL CONCUR IN THE COMMITTEE REPORT. CARRIED. (See page 485 for ordinance.) ORDINANCES AND RESOLUTIONS The following resolutions were presented for reading and adoption: Resolution #3094 A resolution was read ratifying the Phase II amendments to the County-wide King County: County- Planning Policies adopted by King County on July 19, 1994, pursuant to the wide Planning Policies . Growth Management Act, RCW 36.70A.210. MOVED BY EDWARDS, SECONDED BY NELSON, COUNCIL ADOPT THE RESOLUTION AS PRESENTED. CARRIED. Resolution #3095 A resolution was read segregating assessments regarding LID #329 located in LID: 329, Parcel Nos. 1&2 the vicinity of S. 43rd Street, Talbot Road South to SR-167. MOVED BY Segregation (Valley STREDICKE, SECONDED BY EDWARDS, COUNCIL ADOPT THE Medical Center) RESOLUTION AS PRESENTED. CARRIED. Resolution #3096 A resolution was read authorizing the Mayor and City Clerk to enter into an Metro: HOV Funding for interlocal agreement with the Department of Metropolitan Services of King Boeing TIP Goals County (METRO) for funding reimbursement for mitigation fee credits for Boeing. MOVED BY EDWARDS, SECONDED BY SCHLITZER, COUNCIL ADOPT THE RESOLUTION AS PRESENTED. CARRIED. ANC* Nee CITY OF RENTON November 4, 1994 JAN 1 2 1995 Introduced by: Chris Vance VN:(ac) RECEIVED Proposed No.: 94-673 CITY CLERKS OFFICE 2 ORDINANCE NO. 11593 3 AN ORDINANCE amending Ordinance#11446, the 1994 4 Countywide Planning Policies, and determining land uses and the 5 Urban Growth Area for the City of Issaquah. 6 PREAMBLE: 7 The Growth Management Act, RCW 36.70A.110, directs counties planning under 8 the Growth Management Act to designate an Urban Growth Area. 9 10 The King County Council (council), adopted Ordinance 10450 which directed that 11 Phase II, a process for refinement of the Countywide Planning Policies, be 12 undertaken. 13 14 As part of Phase II of the Countywide Planning Policies,the council adopted a 15 "framework"Urban Growth Area(UGA) in Ordinance 11446, which will guide the 16 council adoption of a final UGA in the Comprehensive Plan as required by RCW 17 36.70A.I10h. 18 19 The UGAs for the cities which were in dispute as of May 25, 1994 were designated 20 as Joint Planning Areas in Ordinance 11446. Ordinance 11446 directed King 21 County, the cities,citizens and property owners to complete a planning process to 22 determine land uses and the UGA for each city for adoption by the Metropolitan 23 King County Council. Joint Planning Areas were designated for the following cities: 24 Black Diamond,North Bend, Snoqualmie, Renton, Redmond and Issaquah. 25 26 From June through September, King County met with the above-mentioned cities to 27 discuss issues,criteria and recommendations for the Joint Planning Areas. The 28 information gathered from these meetings was compiled in the attached report titled 29 "Joint Planning Areas." 30 31 King County has considered the city proposals for the UGA and is adopting in its 32 Comprehensive Plan a final UGA pursuant to RCW 36.70A.110. 33 34 BE IT ORDAINED BY THE COUNCIL OF KING COUNTY: /2u/, 2?A ntita~ OrdMot\94-673or.doc\ 11/4/94 12:05 PM Page 1 11593 1 SECTION 1, Ordinance 11446, UGA map in Appendix 1 is hereby amended as 2 shown on the attached recommendation for the City of Issaquah. / 3 INTRODUCED AND READ for the first time this /7,t day of , 4 197y. 5 PASSED by a vote of /3to 0 this/oc day of 6 LAtien414.1, 199 7 KING COUNTY COUNCIL 8 KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON 9 P t o Chair 11 .ATTEST: 12 Le.1‘ 13 Clerk of the Council s 14 APPROVED this 22. day ofIIDALCA•iji4., 19-Q 4i 15 16 ng Coun Executive 17 Attachments: 18 A. Joint Planning Areas Report 19 B. Proposed Urban Growth Area, City of Issaquah Page 2 'war 11593 Joint P Areas Report September 1994 King County Parks, Planning and Resources Department 11593 KING COUNTY PARKS, PLANNING AND RESOURCES DEPARTMENT JOINT PLANNING AREAS REPORT September 1994 Introduction This report provides joint city/county recommendations, and separate county and city recommendations, where no agreement was reached, for the Joint Planning Areas established by the Growth Management Planning Council (GMPC) on May 25, 1994. Joint Planning Areas are specific areas adjacent to several cities where agreement on the Ur} an Growth Area was not reached by the time of the final GMPC recommendations on Phase II Countywide Planning Policies. Countywide Planning Policy FW-1, Step 8, b., identifies these areas by maps, and directs King County, the cities, citizens and property owners to complete a planning process to determine land uses and the Urban Growth Area for each city for adoption by the Metropolitan King County Council. These Joint Planning Areas are adjacent to the following six cities: Redmond, Issaquah, Renton, North Bend, Black Diamond and Snoqualmie. Three additional reports provide information and prior recommendations on the Joint Planning Areas. The three reports are: Technical Review Areas Report, Rural Cities .� Report and the King County Urban Growth Area: Edge Cities. They are attached for background information. Process Between June and September, 1994, King County staff met with the above cities to further discuss issues, criteria and recommendations for the Joint Planning Areas. County and city staff have agreed on recommendations for a final Urban Growth Area for: Redmond, two areas near Renton, Snoqualmie and one area near Issaquah. Agreement has not been reached on a final Urban Growth Area for the City of North Bend, one area near Issaquah and one area near Renton. Those cities will provide written material to the County Council as to why they do not agree with the recommendations described in this report. Regarding Black Diamond, King County staff will continue working with the city on a recommendation for the final Urban Growth Area for Black Diamond. No recommendation for Black Diamond is included in this report. Pursuant to the Countywide Planning Policies, the Urban Growth Area will be amended in a separate Council ordinance. This ordinance will be transmitted separately. Criteria The Growth Management Act and the Countywide Planning Policies establish the following goals and criteria for designation of the Urban Growth Area. King County and city staff have used these goals and criteria, the policies of the Countywide Planning Policies, the Executive Proposed King County Comprehensive Plan, and the vision provided in city comprehensive plans to make recommendations for the final Urban Growth Area. 1 11593 Growth Management Act RCW 36.70A.110 An urban growth area may only include territory that is already characterized by urban growth or is adjacent to territory already characterized by urban growth. Urban Growth Areas shall include areas and densities sufficient to permit 20-year population projections. Urban government services should be provided by cities and urban government services should not be provided in rural areas. Countywide Planning Policies LU-26 The UGA shall: Include all lands within existing cities, including cities in the rural area and their designated expansion areas; Not include rural land or unincorporated agricultural, or forestry lands designated through the Countywide Planning Policies plan process; Include only areas already characterized by urban development which can be efficiently and cost effectively served by roads,water, sanitary sewer and storm drainage, schools and other urban governmental services within the next 20 years; Do not extend beyond natural boundaries, such as watersheds, which impede provision of urban services; Respect topographical features which form a natural edge such as rivers and ridge lines; and Include only areas which are sufficiently free of environmental constraints to be able to support urban growth without major environmental impacts unless such areas are designated as an urban separator by interlocal agreement between jurisdictions. LU-38 The UGA for cities in the Rural Area shall: Include all lands within existing cities in the rural area; Be sufficiently free of environmental constraints to be able to support rural city growth without major environmental impacts; Be contiguous to city limits; Have boundaries based on natural boundaries, such as watersheds, topographical features, and the edge of areas already characterized by urban development; Be maintained in large lots at densities of one home per five acres or less with mandatory clustering provisions until such time as the city annexes the area; 2 TI1593 ' Be implemented through interlocal agreements among King County, the cities and special purpose districts, as appropriate, to ensure that annexation is phased, nearby open space is protected and development within the Urban Growth Area is compatible with surrounding Rural and Resource areas; and Not include designated Forest or Agricultural Production District lands unless the conservation of those lands and continued resource-based use, or other compatible use, is assured. The following material is organized by city and includes a recommendation for urban or rural designation of the Joint Planning Area, a presentation of factual information, analysis and a map of the Joint Planning Area. Where no agreement was reached with a city (One area of Renton, one area of Issaquah, and North Bend) the city recommendation is attached, or is forthcoming. 3 'rose Nue 11593 Redmond Recommendation The City of Redmond and King County staff agree this Joint Planning Area should be designated urban. Facts ■ Approximately 15 acres • Outside interim UGA. • Designated rural by the 1985 King County Comprehensive Plan. ■ Current zoning under the Northshore Community Plan is A-R-2.5, one unit per 2.5 acres. • Adjacent to the King County Agricultural Production District. • Current annexation petition under way for the Betrozoff property at the south end of the area. • The King County Council denied a proposal to rezone the Betrozoff property to one unit per 35,000 square feet during the Northshore plan review. ■ Subdivided into eight lots, which could be developed at densities greater than zoning would otherwise allow. • The City wants this area to be designated urban. • The City recognizes this area as part of it's community. • This area is not needed by the City to accommodate projected growth. Analysis Designation of this Joint Planning Area as urban is partially consistent with the Growth Management Act and the Countywide Planning Policies. This area is adjacent to areas characterized by urban development. It does not extend beyond natural boundaries, respects topographical features and is sufficiently free of environmental constraints. However, the area is adjacent to an Agricultural Production District. Both the Countywide Planning Policies and the Executive Proposed 1994 King County Comprehensive Plan have policies that direct buffering next to agricultural areas.(Countywide Policy LU-4, Comprehensive Plan policy R-205) In the King County Comprehensive Plan, policies direct low density rural zoning next to agricultural areas. However, due to the small size of this buffer area, and a commitment from the City, to ensure that development will be clustered away from agricultural uses, King County staff agree with Redmond staff that this area be included in the Urban Growth Area. The City recognizes this area as part of it's community. The City of Redmond states they will keep this area low density, require clustering along the road, prohibit development on the lower slopes and valley floor, and efficiently provide public facilities. The City states that conflicts with agricultural uses would be minimized by the elevation of the property and a road, which separates the Joint Planning Area from the road. The City of Redmond would like to discourage proliferation of septic systems in this area because part of the city water supply comes from wells. 4 Redmond North 1 1„it., 5 3 Urban Growth Area — f� • fi i ) t ' i 1 /„''''''N.---1 L.-..... Ih•••• �' ,- C) `t,ii.::, : L.-1 ....V•,• 1'f—j•.t �...2.�• I —a.i�4..•e.•.S ��`\•� r� l J.l j... • . - _ . - � 1. > e E ; l i ,.'' ! ;•) r J t t•i-- r — ( I^j 1•• I _ — — T r r `Ifr t t,:•:.•,:.••••a••• ••'''::::: '••••':•••, ..:'••'•.:'•••••:::::::..'::::::':••.i.i:'0:.•.i.iii:4: :•......i.e.';',...,•Vii•i;::::."':••••;•:::-.":.'11:•,•-•‘•::•:i"••'..,:•• •:•:•!.-••,-;:•:'•i• Y. ::.:H.7'.''' ..::::.:'NE!..:::....-{':-...it,..6tn.::,:::.,: :-;,..,:- ,,.: ,.. - 7. S L' -I 1 1 f I ' i ..:.7.-..:TTH:.:;:.:::::::.5'.:.::.:-.:...:::g4..::)::;.p:]!:::.....7"--77... I t ` i .•,:::::.:.'ti...111:1:.;:::11.,.:111:1:.:.:11;;;:firli:I.1:11:1.1"::ig.::.1.':1:111::::111.:.:111:11:::::;:ti::::;:I.:.1.:;:g&:.::;.;1::ill!11511:,:11'.!1;:i.?:-:$1.:15.::';i1,1!::1;i!1:1::!1:::::),1:::!1:.1!;:%::':1.::::11:•':1::::!.:11.::::-111:'1::.::: :!!!:'-!:::::....:":...... ................... c Im orporeted A1509 ^ / Pons I' fi . Potential Annexation Area I Pe:oels 0 0.5 1 1 .5 � " m _ ��' ' Joint P'a _: ^,,:�_:.: :-r N 1993 Interim Urban ;�' Growth .ree line 6e MILES .•.• Propopd Urban GrowthVic, 7: y ? '•7 1SS! • r Asa - r.r 11593 Issaquah Area 1 Recommendation King County staff recommend this Joint Planning Area be designated rural. The City of Issaquah recommends this area be designated urban. No agreement has been reached at this time. Facts • Approximately 60 acres. • Outside the interim UGA, designated rural. • Designated rural by the 1985 King County Comprehensive Plan. • Current zoning under the Tahoma Raven Heights Community Plan is G 5, one home per 5 acres. • Outside Local Service Area for sewers. • Existing low density development, with three churches and scattered single family residences on large lots. • The City of Issaquah wants area to be designated urban in order to provide sewer so the churches if needed, and to square off the city boundaries. • The City has no plans to annex, provide urban services to or develop this area. • Churches have not requested to be within the UGA or to have sewers extended. • Residents in the area have expressed considerable opposition to an urban designation due to significant environmental constraints which are mostly wetlands. • The area is not needed by the City to accommodate projected growth. Analysis Designation of this Joint Planning Area as rural is consistent with the Growth Management Act and the Countywide Planning Policies. This area is not characterized by, or adjacent to areas characterized by urban development. The area is not sufficiently free of environmental constraints. The City states they can provide urban services to this area within the next 20 years. However, this area in not needed to accommodate projected growth and there is no immediate or anticipated need to provide services to that area. The area does not extend beyond natural boundaries. However, it is distinctly separated from the city by a major road. Many of the residents in the vicinity of the Joint Planning Area have expressed concern that the area is rural in character and should not be designated urban. • I 1 5 9 3 Area 2 Recommendation The City of Issaquah and King County staff agree this Joint Planning Area should he designated urban. Facts ■ Approximately 40 acres. • Outside the interim UGA, designated rural. ■ Designated rural by the 1985 King County Comprehensive Plan. • Current zone under Newcastle Community Plan is Q-M, quarry mining. This zone was designated to recognize existing use and to allow quarrying and mining activities to continue to operate. • The site has a buildable plateau and an approximately 600 foot slope. There is a sand and gravel pit at the bottom of the slope. • The City wants this Joint Planning Area to be designated urban. ■ The City wanted to annex this area in 1992 but the city council voted to deny it because of access problems. • The 40 acres is adjacent to a subdivision on Squak Mountain. • Developers are proposing to build 25 houses on the buildable portion of the area and provide another access to the subdivision. • The area is not needed by the City to accommodate projected growth. Analysis Designation of the area as urban is consistent with the Growth Management and the Countywide Planning Policies. This area is adjacent to areas characterized by urban development and can be cost-effectively served by urban governmental services. The portion of the area that the city would allow to be developed is sufficiently free of environmental constraints, does not extend beyond natural boundaries and respects topographical features. 6 Nose . — .010.. . **or East uah - issaci Growth Area1 1 5 9 3 Urban . . , ..__ , ----.:,--i-7.-- • :-. i ! ....,...,..-;.-7."''- -:t-etN. • ' ''••.(: -=`-t.e. • )'-7-.. ' ... '' . •-•••••-7"."•••••-'....... .--".. --,v,.•'•: 4 •.:i."-(" •.... ,-. .••• 1.,!„,--v"4' '. .- ! 1:•:--1'''''•t-i.'-•:;,t 'II: )7i..„,..±v/-:,• • ,.:.c..y>. t., '71 :***•• 1 • 7,-1 '-...n! 1 . ._ ,.. • , ....., •F2•43.6....-r‘, ...:,-71..i.,....Y.,..i....... ..: ., ........ ..,.*': ::: i „.. : ...,,,-.-'•\ '/ : ----- --A—....'- ! f: ; i :•---i,,... .....i.+-*;3_ . . 1 . . .., , -7-7,7,•.,:,.:.: 1.,,.. -E ,, -', r: ,',:•:,.. \'.-. ..-,77:„ ..i.,!..2::...4.t,....;:. 1.._---.; -...i.:,...0:LL,.. ... \....„... ....,,;.;7--..,/ •7;LIT.E-7.--7- :/7---.:: .: ..\_.,.: .,. ;2.,>'.:-::-y:'....:±:":'.::::::::::.:,T":7 -,,, -.7:.:. :::::i....1,--...-*:-................. ,T.rzt- .1• :::'.::-..: " _•... ,.. -,-;-.,,....: .; 7-:: .1 I i ..::, ,,.. ..•••••••: ..,: L.:.Y..:.,--.'-:,:.:,i:-..E ::::,,:., -,s1-.... ... . : :: ' ,..-=- ,,.• 7.;;L:..-7..:.::.,:ii:::,..17:17..,. - . ?: ::::...•..-........''.':,. '!:. . ... -7 .= /.."-''.] / :;:-:-•.:•:--::•., 1-::'':'-::•••'::::::..-:'*.--::'1..::-.. , : ::-.-,V:::::::' - 1::'..7;"----.:.-:-.,•:;.1:: :::,;:::::: • ' .. '-_ . ,z.,'•••,•;i '...'' .-•,..: .;-..... ,.-:,.,:,. :i ( . .: ..: N -,.. ,.....-:;.i,, . ,. .:.:I-..,-,:i: .-t:-.. .7-,.:>;:‘, i ,.- ::: , .. 1.i ,..:::--,,.....„,,..,,,k.,.,.,,,, - ..;c7. 7..:.,....'\:1 ‘.-.._.fe- '', ..\...,•', .:.•:,'' ':;',:i.-.0... .v . • •il . :.. I-• .'. --*- '''' .171..\-/-V:,‘ '': r.T1,. . .4 .;,:::i .....:.,,.:- ....- ...... ,.... .7.7.,i . .::...,--1„:;..::- ....,,,/...1. ,..........:". 77. .:1. .. . . . . :., ..f.:....A'::•*4."'::1;;.?1 7Z7";, 1.... ..r.'77-7":'•:-- •.-.•.''':' ...,.: 1:i• :.: >::'::::•...... .:: - ...77.77.7.!„.... .; :-:-.1.- : *: .':..:.-...L'....1..... ;.44;771: r.......,• ;: iti 01i,,•,54.4...,.••••,..,*ts.ilik:•,;;••1•••••.i.;•t-'-',x,1/4•ti •...'...;•.".. ..[::.........' .. :...;:.:.. ........: .,„.:...„,•,,,,,.„..,, ..:.„.7.1 .:,..I,.. t.. ...,../..s_...--,7-.. ,......,.,:,•1?\ .. ......:r.,..,i,:,.. . :,, :?.........i7....7:r.:•5;....7,1.;P.;:ii,tit.i.:.:11; ,,tii:',.77,,:': -::1:':-.-:-,1....,%.*::'-:::,... -..j..;' ....7-7-77:::::.i.:h..:.'.:.. -'. ,.. t..:. ..:.',•.... E.:::'• ::...::f:::., ].::F::-.::• :.:..::::..:-.:•:':.;r::: 42-4.-::::2..-::: .77--.. ::'k..1:::..:::.-.:::-:ii.: :: f:,''..4.,'-''', .' '.4t..,-*•.:!..:: . . . 71-t2;:=...•_' .,,- .:::::::::•,:i.i::::::.::.:. .....,-::::i . ::i:;:' . .. •t:t71.,:•...: :-,1:.,.::::.::-..!.:'.-' -:•.:.:,:::::'.'!-.:-.:::::-.':::::.,..-.:,...-:•,. .)•tt7;-:*::...:::-•:•::•,:,..i. i.0,..4.......< . :. „::.....f.,...-..,,-..*,,;:::::,:,....:.H-,::7:•.'i. .-01:..::::.:E:'•::::::•:••:•::::•:•1,:::_::::::::::':-,?::::. *.-.Y':.,...,'::..:...; ..::::-,';',:•:::•,• ::::::::: :::.!.....;--- •!•.a-..!.::!-Ii.'": i!.::::;..:1,-;•,:E.',1:.:•,.;:;:.:; : 401 . :...41,t•' ;'••.',*•"...,. : :,':,t';;;::;......E.:•f i:::•••.';:;•;;; ;:'...',..,:,•.': .•-••••••.•:':, ..:•,-.;:;:..•••• ''-.:::%:••;,::::4•:..!-i.-;.',-;...-,...i•-t ..:::::.....!41;.;1'..;:::..:':..: w.1.1.."7.,..1::..-1::::::•:...!--",• •'-'7.i; 12414;:‘:;i :T ::'.......:•••••.:..: '...•::::':i•i•Vqfti6'.•!I'.'....:<:::. . •;•••....:4. qg': :..'ii, .i.;.:.i'i,'',;:::::;:•::•.:, ;;L.4.: ',I!..••::.::::,•!...,•::.;:'...••••...,..::::::",'Ii-i.'...... :::!::' ...:••;;.:...;••••:,:; .. ..:-.....;:•%.::::-,:!...i:.. ..1-.: ••,.i••••,. 's,-s: •• ••'. 7.4.;"';'''..44 :1:•.'':':....:4%14;::....... ..44.Itiit4i'Yi'......0;'.-•:•• 'fil4E....A1•41)4,0;', ',.7%.47777..1: :,..;,6!.:,g4'.:..,,i.L'•:.••••;... .:...4,-7-,•••'. .........N..9.,. ..:E,::..t...j .,..,,....,.: ::,; , ,N. .7..::::::„:,... .........._:........,....:, ,........7.:..i.,....,,t.....4 .,i:::::. 14.4,;.:::..._ •,,,.„........ lk-.*:: ;'.;...p.:0:.•.;:..'6•':;ii.::,..i.qP,4:44iN..........-qk;.'"::4..gt*.i.:iii:::: ..:-.W..,...tD.T.':::::::.:',1j"...w ?•,...-:-:,.:Wii ..4.:.::!..a.R0t,t4.,?.... ..-- --' --':::'i l: '.'.• - LI ','?;$,...;0.4..t..,4,1'.."..A.V.:"*.,1!..::;.<,::;`..2.-7...t:?::.'sg.;A:Cti',.:ii:.rsiii:,4:4•.;4t-i::;:'...I:c.g:.$ .:;!..i.V.:,::!:::$:e '..;;.,,...4.:::ANT:::::.MIO.'i.f. ilt].:.j:j .....''._-.7:7-7.....':.. --:—... -'•-:;-.-27- °;i7..::,.:.:*:: .L.;:.- ..-:....---,4. .......7.,. ":7,.....4::.:'?•411:g.::-.44.1.1,1nr.E;ii•:t..4.4. ...,:.,., _____77, :.7..... ,-7,7',...,:,,-;:::::::', ...-.7„.,....;::.;.;::: 'k'sz!z :•.: ;:•.: . ..'.16i.:::',I.:'::: •‘',..;. ..,..I:..,i.„...,:‘,....:.; .:...i:-.'''...':';;', .::. '1,...•:::•(r.W-... ..:•:II:i'7.I.f..'..::.:•....::':::•::•I•N'':::4-.4ii•!: .:::. II7%::.JI':•.•:.I:.•::.",•;:i•i'•:?I'f• '',.:::.:: 7E':':•''''''s.:•:' - --- L17- ..t!:24... .......ti.I'II;t5p0IiIiIF..5e%g,.4.1k:....:„.. ...:Ia4IiI.I.:;;;Rii....t;.I.s*• :g7I$4,:,.. ...... :-..,,:.:1••.Ia.::' '•,..':':•I:I.•.'::,K1.I..•'.I'••':'•::.••:At:q-:'•.'II'?•.• .k'•:I:. .I':C:.::•:'•..'.;II.'.I.:• ;:•••.,1 Vlqtjn: :24.....,.-. •.••;]•... . ,,. • •.•;:•; ?wII",::I."••••••-Iii:;••Q..•:?;.q . -:•,.II:I•:::-•-..I•I'l.:•:..iiI•:•I'::::.i . AI;I':i;•;.-:.I•:::.I•iI,:. •::-1.-...:::;:4::. ::-.:...::::,i.ikii:.:•.:-.. m;::::.,.:.'•,•..::::::::.::::,::: "7.4441111,:..g1ii ...i.. .•:'.0 '...'''.::":: .'..:.•...,.....;:...,..,,,•-•, :t;..::•If'. 1 .._ ...-....,,,,,:m.-. ..,..w.:••••••-• • . .... :,.......,?$.*i*1:,:.,..:.::::;:.::::::::'.v.:m::-•....i:i].0•• i:...-:Iii:: :i•gai.i.•AIIIItIiI:I•..',. .:,-::•....:.:*:-.:..•,...:...:...,..„:,-,•,•....:...:•„;:- . • .,..:1:.•;!•:.:0,1•;;;.4.hi:sIM ',::,s.-.'s..?...i:.......t-,44. • ....................... -.:•:-.:',.•:,...a:•.:•:•..........,:::::.:.:':,?::-,.:;,.:•: ::i 1 ..-----:"':::*4',:....,•,:,:,,,i.,2,....z.!!.z.-.4:-..:..-.:.,,, :...:,.. ss,...... - ...:::*-..,.:,.:::-.>-,...,.....:-..::::..,.,z,::,;,,,::, :::•i•••,.i.•,.....-., • ::::::?.:-:: :!:...i-.:.:',-.•••.: :-.•:,•.:.•:;?••• 1 Z-..1,, ,:.:.::::i..,::,::.:,,:,,,:.::::.....,•••••••,.;:,-...,:-.:::,,,:z.,::-.....••.......;,::.,..:•:•,.: -...3:,:•:...,::.:,,,,,,....-..,....,.•-•••;::...., — - - --• I i•:i-:•.. ::.•.;.•:•:...:. .:::'::::i::•Ii.i:,•::•::::.•.•:•,...:]:•.:::::-. ---7-1- :.. .4P',',.-k:'.:.I.,4:...n.A.V.P',4III-?.I'...E.4'i::. •,,,.:„.....:I:..4...-; .;•••.:..t.::.7::..i. I.:•.4VI': .. . ..•:,:.. I .....•;:.-::-.-....,..:-...•-.. I 1.................4. ..... ..... •....... --"......... .•••...... ...,.„..„ ... .. .. .. '''...''..-'..•..'7,:,;iI;:.,•:?r-. .1I.S.1::;:',;;iiI:,.I... .:4ift...s..::.:,....t.i.ttIgglIOI.A.I:I!.....4..4...Vil'JRIAIgi?iii4:: :::!:•:-... —e;.. .•-" ::j..-.: ',...•:: .:.:::::..-• im,:..:,.:::: ::.r...i:. .:.:.::?..:,:=1:. -..-,:ii•:::.:.,-,A.:: :.:i:.....::., .:•;•,,..„.? :•i;::„...... K.... ..:.,..1-...:.,..: ::::•••::::.:•5i*.f.tif::•••iI4:,I.,••:.:::Ni:::',.,::::,..,.. ....f..::::::. :;i. ::::?.::f:::.•:::::::::-,:::......::-..:::)..::,..,f.:::: :::,:::if::::•:::. -.:.:..:.,..,... _... •:.:::::;:::::.::::::•::?:.;•.i.::,., . 1 : : :.::::•:::::.•:...:::.:i:ii::•:•,:.i.....:......,..;ftw.:-.:::-....,,, :•?.::::..........ii›.::.:;:. ,i-,..*::::::::/I 7/:.,:,:::::.Jj..fe-L1Ir,.>,.-..7,.>.•-J.'•>,:-,...-1'.:..-..,7•:i:•:. :•::.:;:7'1n i 7;:•.—...4..i.::,‘:-:;-.?:..-,:.I;. :t•.,'...—t..,.::....:,Y..:;.g ::;i:..:..:.:.. ::.:,:.':R4::A.::i:;.:.:5..:,:.:0::.;..iK.:-':.5?.1:.:.,.Mg:i.—..:i.:..:•.. .%.:.::.n.;...s.,..*:..::.::•:.r:g...:i....;5:.-:::i. :I:,:::::;..::.,:.:i.I'.!i..:.i•r,:-.. iI..::• •.:.,,;: ...t..4::I^..:::.i::".N‘:.:-k..-I..-.;.:--:'.'..,:•,,.— .::..7.f ?...,:'...:::':::.:..:....:,.i:I!•i:..0'V.''_.::::i:i:..'•-.c.::•".::.•_.:::i;,;'ii.:;i:.••::•i_.::::!.;.?,.'4:.::.:.4:.*•i::•r h:s.,.,•;.:.. :•!.....].:.•i:,.:. .:•ii:iZ: ::.•i.-.!..:,:,•..r•r:.?.]:..:;••:::•:.::'i V..:..,.,.:..i ».-.,.:.;I:.,.,•::;::•*.i v::,i•-t.e:::•.::,.-,:i•i•--:i.i.,.'i,:i•Ij.,- 4•:- ,t,,•-:,:,•.;.7•:2•4••.•::•i'•;.::.'.•::.:.k:'•:.::::::..,.:0'.::.,•.• :,:,.::::g:,Q:.:•',..i•I.•:.;*.iI4:.•i::::•*::;::.•::•::...::::,*:.ii,i;,i.•I;...;t.,::'•ix:'..i..'......:;y::-::.:,•:i•.::..$:.....,:.:q,:..::.'.A..,:.::::.',;..i•:',;>:-.,i•.....''i•i',::.i.t•,,.....'.•...,:1.....,:•.::...,.,.'.'.••..-..t..,:.•...,,:•...-,V•.:.!.1m,•;:.;:-'.._:..,...:;.ft:•.—.:..,::,.",.:,..::w::..::i..:I.;,...i.:: :i:..*•:::."-..:.....g0r'.x.•..•...:..,'...,..:.i;-.'.:M:•..N:.•:.n.,.i:-..,.,.%::'E:..i,::?•.:0:A',.„:ft.::,..:::.:P,..X.Iz.:."::.•.:I.: ::....••.-;.;....:;..:i... ::::;..,?i:.—..:..".:-.:•. *.7.l-.•::.'..:_•...'.:.:....i.,.,'iir..::,.,..0.',;:,,*..,-.•.:'., .:.t. Area2 .,.-1. i1.•r N. ,-7.L.-.'..•A.':7_.•1..:.:!.7 1.,.r.••i7 .•.f-.7•..-;I _..j."...a...I.,E:.I • •:...,:_-:..9:.._=._.3 1__:.., _1..1.. ..... .1 U- r ba—n — ......-. .._,. _ • oo r.r i_ 1 ........ - I i ' - I—I — — — ' I''........_ , '; :. I -- L . — _ ..-- IncorporatedA I Polon.niAnnation 0 0.5 1 1 .5 2 "/ - GwhAr l A — e.nc...3..et a.l.. s P MILES Prcpod UrbanGrowth •, _.:-- -- - -'-- - ,000 Renton 11593 Area 1 Recommendation The City of Renton and King County staff agree this Joint Planning Area should be designated urban. Facts ■ Approximately 78 acres. ■ Within the interim UGA, part of a Technical Review Area. ■ Designated urban by 1985 King County Comprehensive Plan. ■ Current zoning under Newcastle Community Plan is Suburban Residential (SR 15,000). ■ Outside of Local Service Area for sewers. ■ The City wants the area to be designated urban. ■ The area is semi-rural with some smaller lots and subdivisions, with some large tracts of vacant land. ■ Contributes surface water runoff to the May Valley. ■ Technical Review Area report recommended this area be designated rural mainly, due to public opposition to an urban designation. ■ The law firm Cairncross and Hemplemann, representing the Morrison property on the eastern portion of the area, prepared a report with justification for including the area within the final UGA. ■ The area is located within the Special Assessment District for the east Renton interceptor making the provision of sewer service to this area feasible within the 20 year timeframe. ■ The city believes inclusion of this area within the UGA would further protect the city's aquifer recharge area by providing sewers. Analysis Designation of this Joint Planning Area as urban is consistent with the Growth Management Act and the Countywide Planning Policies. This area is partially characterized by urban growth and is adjacent to area characterized by urban growth . It is sufficiently free of environmental constraints, the city can efficiently provide urban services, it does not extend beyond natural boundaries and respects topographical features. 11593 Area 2 Recommendation King County staff recommend this Joint Planning Area be designated rural. The City of Renton recommends this area be designated urban. No agreement has been reached at this time. Facts • Approximately 80 acres. - ■ Because of a mapping error, this area is partially within the interim UGA, designated part urban, part rural. The line was intended to be consistent with the Soos Creek Community Plan. ■ Designated rural in the 1985 King County Comprehensive Plan. • Current zoning under Soos Creek Community Plan is AR 5-P, one home per 5 acres, with development conditions for clearing and grading, street trees, significant tree retention, and street design. • Existing low-density development. • Within the floodplain. ■ The City wants this area to be designated urban. • The City wants to provide road improvements to the bridge that serves the plateau, just northeast of this area which is designated urban. • King County already has road improvements scheduled in the next six years for safety only. • The area is not needed by the City to accommodate projected growth. Analysis Designation of this Joint Planning Area as rural is consistent with the Growth Management Act and the Countywide Planning Policies. The area is not characterized by urban growth, it is within the floodplain and thus not sufficiently free of environmental constraints. The City states they can provide urban services to this area within the next 20 years. However, this area in not needed to accommodate projected growth and there is no immediateor anticipated need to provide services to that area. The City of Renton wants this area to be within the UGA so they may provide road improvements to the bridge that serves the plateau just northeast of the Joint Planning Area which is designated urban. However, King County currently has road improvements scheduled in the next six years for safety. The area does not extend beyond natural boundaries. However, the City's proposal does extend into the floodplain and thus does not respect that topographical feature. 8 11 5 9 3 Area 3 Recommendation King County staff and the City of Issaquah recommend this Joint Planning Area be designated urban. Facts ■ Approximately 80 acres. ■ Outside the interim UGA, designated rural. • Designated rural by the 1985 is ng County Comprehensive Plan. • Current zoning under the Soos Creek Community Plan is AR-5 one home per 5 acres, with development conditions for clearing and grading, street trees, significant tree retention, and street design. • The city wants this area to be designated urban to provide a squared-off boundary for service provision. • This area has very steep slopes and is within erosion and landslide hazard area. Analysis Designation of this Joint Planning Area as urban is generally consistent with the Growth-, Management Act and the Countywide Planning Policies. It is adjacent to areas characterized by urban growth. While it has steep slopes, extends beyond the natural boundary of the ridge and is environmentally constrained by the slopes, the city wants to include it mainly to eliminate irregular boundaries. The City does not intend to develop this area at urban densities or to provide urban services throughout. 9 ,...., ,..,„„„ Renton - East Urban Growth Area .. , Ill ; i '1---t _ . ii. :,..„ .._...,..„7___________.7 11593 J.. -, Area 1 ' , I• _...!_ _ j/ —r 1 I - t !-s • : I _ • _ J-Ti ., — tom`- — I I � •s- ' -1:I iI I r — —r •f rr ■Aftft t' tff■N■♦■t■ytirY —.....,- _• • _J 'i♦r.H17 �1 t _ _ �_. -^R1 , .. :1 /*, 1 r i- a Lr 14 _r._ : _ t �'r' • ) _ • - rI t • - :IT t rl r —t t {t{ • .. _+� >._ ��_( t f 1 _ 1. t .t'.'om ? {,t •� f . I • .:• 7. _.• L LTv .i j- — . f r 1 _L_ ! 7 . _ 1 t J f I 1 ,_� ; _.. • IT �. J4 �::••:,'.;r77:'•:.1::•.'""••• a � 4. , 1 L, t i < f.. Y 1 v/ i • • ■f e v:•.:)4 �{. u 4 ,-1ri�,: Z 1 •t■ + ,i.%^laf■. 'r Y eii •I. ry} 4 7 ~-' Area 2 '9; i. r �� -- r"(-4 .• , ,-;` i.t*�iii::rr � .� is • O''S� • 111 111 Area 3 7' '• L.... L.— — �1 "f R . • • In orpora;ed !,rapt Roads 6 F I....... . Paroels • Potential Annexation Area 0 0.5 1 1 .5 ,,,, f = ___ ^/ 1993 Interim Urban >,i ' r J> Join: Plan _� Aea Growth ,Crap line MfLES Proposed U75an ,,rowth 11593 North Bend Recommendation King County staff recommend this Joint Planning Area be designated urban. The City of North Bend recommends this area be designated rural. No agreement has been reached at this time. Facts • Approximately 480 acres ■ Outside interim UGA, designated rural. ■ Designated rural by the 1985 King County Comprehensive Plan. • The area is the developed subdivisions of Cedar Village and River Bend south of I- 90 and east of Cedar Falls Road. • The City does not want this area to be within their UGA due to expected costs of providing services and infrastructure. • This area may need a higher level of service provided in the future. • This area is an existing urbanized area and has little potential to accommodate new growth. • At public meetings conducted in the spring, citizens of this area indicated that they do not want to be within the UGA. • Analysis Designation of this Joint Planning Area as urban is consistent with the Growth Management Act and the Countywide Planning Policies. The area is already characterized by urban development. Because the Growth Management Act and Countywide Planning Policies both call for urban areas to be within cities, it is appropriate for the City to provide local urban services to these urban subdivisions due to their current urban nature. Within the Urban Growth Areas, transfer of local service provision is expected to occur over the next 20 years, and may not occur at all within the next decade. Staff believes that agreements could be reached during this time to address fiscal concerns raised by the City. The subdivisions of Cedar Village and River Bend are contiguous to the east end of the interim Urban Growth Area. Staff recommends that the City and King County discuss the _ option of shared financing of infrastructure and service needs for areas that were developed under County jurisdiction and are recommended to be included within the City's Urban Growth Area. The River Bend subdivision is south of the river, and therefore its inclusion in the Urban Growth Area does not respect the river as a natural boundary. However, it is characterized by urban development. Provision of urban services is not expected to be impeded by natural boundaries. io ..... ,....., „......, • North Bend 1 1_5 9 3 Urban Growth Area ,.... ; -- . . : : . . . . .._. , -.. ..._ ..:,.. „....,.... .71.'.. 1..,...''''''. t,.%',..7M;7.•,•.;; .,;:.:.. ''S,'.:/. .....4./. ,:l .--..."1-..- .....r...7.---.`ti .\* s, 'I.; ': ,]Q;•.„;- ......'.. ",,:;;;',i:;`,.;;M:,::;;;;;W :,...., :....?7:.1 1 I __,7.777: 111 ',.,.a..,.., ''i:;.;:::4::.',.•.::>:.,.......',;P,ii,...- .'?.?.. .:.;P:M1- :',-,::i .,:j'''''' ,i-',..;.*. '' .... ..,..,,,-.73... i . r s':=, '. ::zAA's';'''*:','.:',- .: ' >2r4,;?..t,. :?. .p.i....... . .. •, .—. ...-L 1--._,....:.•:..,_,... : ,,_..,.7,....._• ......,,k. ..,,,,::.:..•:,,,,,,:,;:::,:. .::::,..,:....•:%:-::::::.;:::;!.., :::,:*,::::.:•..,:::::::, . C?j,,.. ._..• ' .T''.7'•A:. :•-..',..;:,.!:.-,.,-.:••• •-•,..,'. :•::::.;.:.*:::,,i.::::i,,:<:::::,,,,,,,:; :.:•.•,.... .; r.•;-;:=...-.:::,:7 y.? ..:.;:.:.i.....,:f.^.-:”:;•.:••r••••• 4f :::.;A<•!:::•1.:':*:::::•:.....: .:.:.:••• •-,:::::r,::::.•1•••:,:1'.:".411:•.:•••.:•:,.- .•::::::::::: :,:::::::::11i:::::i1;:::3:1;•:•*•:::::: .., .1,4:.r:--7:4 7"..'::: n ::, . •••• •;;;.:::.:1::%.;S:•.:;V:: :::: :,;:::'•1•.*:::*::!•M:,1: iW:•':: : :, :-.‘4.--V 4.-.....-1 ;a:•.fa:!.•:,:,..::••;. ;'4;:D; •4:: ':•...;.•••••'.•;:Ka:: :,• 4.:.,,',4:g.'5..ti.M.V• ;:n—•••—'; I ...____... ..1 ,..,,;::... ,iE.:*..,.-f-::•:;:, .: .,?..4:.., "-:%:::::.*::i:i.,;:5t:,:::;.:;:.,:: 4:7:-.4.: ::: ::: :;•,.44. :Z.7::::"-',/ ''•i;''''4:"..,i'•','"i#,*z;', ...•'''''' '',:i:MC..,:.. .''''?!'":::s.•';' W.::?.::: :*..t!‘,.:::i:*'•,.,: ,isi, ...__._.:::..... '. :::*:: :, i':::-::;'i. ": ::?:i''';':..::'":i':;:;.:: :,'R 11'::,::W.Z. ::W::ii: '."-**----t.%. ---- --- \ 7.iii4:14.:P.Ii:;',..:;,:4t.,.1:::::!.,: •,..%.fht.t.e.. .Kg.;:5iri...,k5:g:i .:-.....,.;4.E1M,%MitYA• • I %- '; 1 .-i `,-.... . :iiii , .4;!ieg,ii*.;*. :,...':::',.-.s.:%..':.:§:.,jfti.:`..&•S:;.' .." .. .....;....r.i,....._:,, : .... s r.!::';',Z::.:::?-:•::::::i::::.:,:i..,.:x::•:::::i:::::,: i,i,,i;....,r,1?,.:::::mi:•...,...,::•:';'''.5:•:4(.:;;;Iinn,1%* -- ---. ..__......-.-..... • •I. ( .. : '',.;M:Mii:i7ii:: ::::i.:4.:iii.;'!.::::: .*;.:.,'''.;::.::i:i:ik..',:f...:,.....::.:: ,%z:::i,,;1. .... ., ...i:. ..,_.......,,.. . ., '''..."'"'''''''',',4,:e,'*iti:rif•kit:?; ?..4::,:;.WN't.:::',....:.::if"pt!::?:•.ii 7-e:,_._ ..,t , -1 ..., ....] : •`.... •:T.,,.;;M:•.::::.?•:::::::::::::!:',:m:,,:::::•:•:•:!.:•:::-.,..::::,...a:.:::::::::::::....-::::‘,.....x:if,:,. • :..„,:,:, , .: ,,‘....,........ ; • s., ......:::::4,,,,,,,,,K,:,.,;.: ,::::::::::.,‘,,:f.::::,2„5:••.::::.• ......:. :::, , -&,”:•:..-.::......:: _,,,,.:::::.:t• _._.P; •.• .. .. ! , •'..------:'•-• ••:':?.`•••:'::Ii:Li%%i'%..giii .:::WV.:::::1:11.4•:.i.:.•V:$•::::i11/.?:*:.?::;1::i1.i:2.0:ii:::.:::...:::::•:,:::LA: •'•:;:_ ••1.-.•••••• -..s?...„.j.. ........................._ .._......_...... _ . ......2..1..._................r.___I.. .......:7__ •. i /--• :.:.:.•,:.:„ ".:,..;,..:f:.:,..:—..,„:„.„,„:,. ::,:„..n.:„,;;;.:•,,,,,:,,.:.;:.:,,:.,,. ..,.,,.,./..,405: ,...: ,....., .':..t..,::::••ft:M.,.,:•?.::•:-.4:i:::?.4!?.. .i,if.:::::.--:,„:i•nt5(.,•;,:,:•::::•=4;1 .,„......„,.:„. ,- ..s..,.,1,,li....., : : • I ,,,,....,.?„.\,:.4,...•:...:•,:::::::,....-...,5:k::::?.1,•!,.7.,,,:,..a.4k..,:::*;44,•:;.:•••1,4••11.m::1::i;i:::„.1„......\ .:. . / I .1: :::i:::•..4:::,•,%::::i0:::.•,::..:',, ,,:•:.:....,*•:,:.:::,-.1..r..-....,h,-\,pi..:;:.:•:•••.::::...:::.:.:..•..,:•:•::.. //4- i W.: I • ! ... ill: ,:........ ,-. •-• - -7--.,.. -.1 '• ::::::s:,:::::,;:::::::::.:....:•:•:•:-:.:....:.:..•,.:.:,.....:...,... •.-,,,t,.,, ......,:„.;:,::::::,,,,;,,:.,..:,,,:,.: .,. 4, ... ...-. ................,...........„............ .! -..:..-,....... : _-.i..... ,...................__.,,::.7j„...j: • •' .. . ,, 1 •,•: 1 :,.I _......... . ::,,- Pig.iiN.i.:!i.%%is.'4. .\•.:..V,:nz:.;:::6., ::!:::!.::•:.:::::,::::::::::..:;:......, ':.i.i.:...,::...L:::::,e2 ' ''''.1 ,.* , .,i i ; ._. : ,,-; -:1 I: . , •" •.. •• ••:::::.::1'. ::‘;•;2•::::i,•••-• / •,::::::,:::::::11••::::„::.1: 11:i:irr..F., :::..'1i1*i:::„..:•,',..:.1110 • ... ) ... .• ; . 1 - '' • --- L ••—•-• ..—..t:...I : — ,..., .<,. I.:—.• 1::::77,7• .c.,.,::::::.:::::,:::::,:•:::::::::,::::,„,,•:::•:•:•:••:„ ..„.:,::,:::„,::,:::„,:::::.::::: ,;,„„.:.,,:„.•.,,....„ • /4 p •j,.. ......), .: ,T.. . : r 1-.i. , : - .: • : --, .::-,..--...,,---;••;::7:•i • •-...ss,::in,-.::',i-, ...:.'•,,,,•*:-''':,--1.. ::W.::::';*4*:...•; .i:,::-. •:,.!•:.:•,:::::::::•.:,:f...::.,.• ... ..:.. ......z.s i................„..,;::.i.,._..,..... .... ..;....2r....(.; I- ..: ,i , ......,,...,•-, "-l"""1;;Vgiti7M.:..4:3•-•'::::;..:i:•i;:: l: :i:'::iMi::.*;:?.?::::::;iMVcP :., (Z.,)•..s .,. • 7,..:' ‘,...' j ,, .,.,1 " ..1.-7... ;._;...1....4••../4....4", .: ...,...._....,. .,, , :':.':;'''':':::.:::18 '': ',--if:' ,..-"•'•:•':::::.'s.::::'i*:::i": ;:•••:•:••:•:•ai•:•., ,.7;•:• • ..-- ........-'••••1 •:1.- . r'i •**-1 • ::•'•-•:.":-.• `\•••1 e•• ::!: :::::::„.:.,.., 4, f.:•,:.:Ea:..i ,";" '''IN."----''''''''ci.:;.i.i.-ii.;i:..1%.......... :i::: ,iii.4.5.•:.:.,::;:.•:.,..i..... • •-... .... . :: . --.. '..);• ..e•0-'1.a•\.!.•,4;:,:••••7.....j:.,,i...i I !•_•-;:„_........- i. .•-•-.2:-L. .1-- ....:". ..\..t:::.c.', ••.--../...., -, ,. . \,.. ..'"- -;•,'-':•!':. ' :;.1; 4,11.;?..; ....c;.,..:.!:_.i..;,, ii.j-'..:;;7.';„...••..•T, i;'::::.:•:i.::, ;,,,„:.1." ''•oc"..7.7.4._•_::-.7.:::i•::::::::*1 ,„ W,,;:,:::,:,:'.,;,,,,,:;:;,1W4:1-• ",.. ••••., 1•••—,....r...;r:: :•:). :•! :••: ::•?'"--_4•,::.-4 ,:.:„':, ",'."', ? .:. 1-4"____b I __I-.2.7,•,;\.if...:. :S•::;:i:iiii;:iii:ii:!:-;.c_. ":•::::.••••• :i,i::•:.: iii:..'. ...,•,,,\.., ::-.. i 1 1-'--;,:. 1 /1.•....:=---_7_,...t...,...=.....z--:-:;\'''..\\* :'-',.--:••:::7.---..'::4t,•;7_%?%17.,t,:1- ....;...:'L.'..L.'"i*---...--.'.:it:d1;-7.:. .e....i::-i...li‘;::4;;;-7.11.1:1:•.:..:11.77....,H.-i:''... ..."7.ii..,-,,.'s\L\rz.:-.....;1,-.),,d/i::.11)..:;\..-. 4--.................................... L...L...::-..- q ---7-___I --i-----"_•:".\ --- -•,••. ,... i•-•..........: .•--A \.4L\:\ 1„.":7' '7.'4.4.i.k.;,:>..., ,..r..:. ,..t.livd,.,,,„.:.,..4,....,....,... 1 : •- ,......: : ..• ,.... ::=-' ‘r.---\\;N • - - -T7. , 7''''.7i. .... kA,--7,..7..:.•,:--.1.. „_ • - •-.. .;I.:i --.... ..... , ....,,.. ... , ......,,,,,,..I - ::•):7-....- -,,,...--1,,.--...• . -• • ,,,...., I : ..,..... ----..--• ....7..,_-.77-:t:•:... . ,.... . .. _ .. • :-7•.,1/4 s ......--....... 1•'}:4%..."•N,':'. ;----,r,;.„,:.,...4. i ....-..1.-:......krt,Ae, .t*:.• .•.. „ •. ..;' ..'„._ ..• ''••• i,..;i:,1..,"..1-, : .:: ; '. I''''-'?"'4. ,•".N..,"e ,i ?-... •,...‘3-.....•,'; ! ' -* te • ; > .• ' .-„ ••11 Ni --..... •..a_, • ..- \ I.-1 ! ,-,-----:::: ‘,.,.1.,•-:, , -, ),...,;\ : , ..---.„ ,, ,, r— ZP...p...qw; •.,:: :. . • •\:. . .• , --..=.-;-: -;•••:-,'!:, ,,. .%-- ''•- .,... 4 . ,,,, • •A• ...r.7:•“r.......7...z,... ••. '--..., ,,f.'• '.•:.. • ,. V4,,-• .• . .). , V<",11 _ • .1.-,I—`',- :: •.•• . ....... •:.--..':.• I ,1.'"•>...) , A,,?. • )) 'A., ''. '.1'..., . • : S\4.'. .• . .'-t..' ,.. 1 ' . •••••."..!re.4'4).4 /W V\ • .. A X „,... . •s • f...._...\ - 1 , ,. • _. -..!:714:'.. ...:';..7.... .49)Lr k".%.>'•::.•- t&-I )>,,e' .... 1 I ! ...... - - \1 .• ••••••—•,Cr- ''' ,*.v• '' , .. :-..- , ,s, .• \',./,`'.---• • ..-•• .•4 are*wir•-•:es•ililiMr-••11 11,4 lifil•••-•-••••.•— •••;1--. _•• '-'1 r: : ...-- : 7 — >.•-......-.....-1 ''''• e,, .....-1 :. . . ...... •.,,s. ,. . ,''''•'' 1 • . ' .... ...‘.......... ..........-.........— 1., .',......-...... ' ............ I l . .. T I . : I 1---......... '1.1. \\)'-'-' 11 ;,--i..11:1,,,.-kfr.+7(...11.7_4.t..:1,.7.T.'................. _ _ _ ':....._'....... 1; • • _ ,.,-;_..,•• , ..,..4. .....,....,_...... -- : • .--- I ..-'7.---1 \ )- •:.! : : : 1 I:' 1. :1•.- 1 1 ,'"' 1 1 .1 .. ., . :...• ‘• ' : , ; \ •••1 -:..... •..-....,.....- -1...1,.....1.__......_,...,.....,:,:,.,... i/• "7 _ 7:•: •:.!--.2 f 1 /-"N• / .' '..i........--. . ''. / .... ...-.1 ' , --••• :.:.••• / i .:7:ii.';'..4::: ; ls Incorporated Ar Perc-e eas Q L.... .;:.•.; 19S3 Interim Urban R).,),.'?::3 Joint Penn. Growth Area line 0 1 ') .•_ : Proposed Urban Growth ..,... MILES N Ro&de 11593 Snoqualmie Recommendation The City of Snoqualmie and King County staff recommend this Joint Planning Area be designated rural with a Joint Planning Area overlay on the map subject to the conditions of the 1989 interlocal agreement that was adopted as part of the Snoqualmie Valley Community Plan. Facts ■ Appr iximately 1,200 acres and includes the I-90 and SR-18 interchange. ■ Outside interim UGA. • Designated rural by the 1985 King County Comprehensive Plan. • King County, the City and Snoqualmie Ridge Associates signed an interlocal agreement in early 1990 which outlines specific commitments for the Community Plan expansion area and for a joint planning area outside of the expansion area. This agreement outlines continued joint planning in the area to the south of the Snoqualmie Ridge proposal adjacent to I-90 over the next 20 years, which is the life of the agreement. Some provisions of the 1989 interlocal agreement are paraphrased as follows: 1) The area outside the expansion area is rural, and King County will not allow urban development here without community plan revision. 2) Snoqualmie will not consider annexation requests or provide utilities to the joint planning area for the life of the agreement (20 years from 1990 or until another agreement is reached). 3) Snoqualmie shall be the purveyor of future urban services to this area, and King County agrees not to allow urban services to develop without consulting with the City. 4) The County and City agree to review long term land uses through future joint planning efforts. 5) Snoqualmie Ridge Associates agrees not to annex property within the joint planning area during the term of the agreement. Analysis Designation of this Joint Planning Area as rural is consistent with the Growth Management Act. This area is not characterized, or adjacent to areas characterized by urban development. However, the 1989 interlocal agreement that was adopted as part of the SnoqualmieiValley Community Plan remains in effect. King County and the City of Snoqualmie are committed to the provisions of that interlocal agreement. 11 ... 4........ _sow . Snoqualmie 1 i 5 9 3 -Urban Growth Area ... n.;.7.-cp'...•,....7.......--, • I• : r s; sr• -,---:::•;', 't 7: 4 ' 7/, \4, • ‘„)'•. -P.' •••.:'‘ 1 1 ::'-...r • ,' ,•1. ti•I 1„:. :. 1:-1-.,•;,_•'1>.'• ' //'`.. . •-•:• •.../tO' .., .,.•-..... , ,---:'' :. 1 ''": /' •• 't''-'—' ':'''' •7',,' 1 '-• ,f ; 1 ,! ., sV.s, , . /;/„.•-I-7-v • i-',\ • : • i• 1 ' ./' ; ••41 i 1.::"'-:•:-.4-2/••-' 1 . •7, gr'/i'l'i' '"), , :.-.......,-::-.•-•- .::::.:, , - ::'•••• 1 ..c?"• •;471 .. r ! •7;,;••••/%:-,,,,,,--•••••-::•‘-•.:3.:z::. • .. • czT, __,---- •; n.) •.: ,,,•-..,.-:. , ••••••77.:-:::-.--...:.c.:::::! --,; :..„. ;.,;J: „...,...4)., ;\. 'i , .,,,,,FA,,..,...,...:_,--.. ,.;\ ,•, )....._.. .. . - ..-.-- .....,,,, :; , .. , .:er.-o.1 :1-• \-1 \.,\ 1-'' ,'-',/;.!.. .!-`:',\;,‘,,,%. '...),,, , \. ''f:- •- .•'";''''''' 1 o- / •••• ',.1.t..E7 it ! .-..--.--..'..'-'•••.‹.ii i i'.1,2:•:':`,";%::.'"`Z\-....-A,... f .•'' .7/7! ;7. .,..::. --ltriT.....7 Iii..,•H"'”--. 1 '''' --4"';'•:"- ."1*.;:i • -Iv.\:\Z. • 7 ,-...:-...-1.-.=-' ..' \''' \ • .4 ' -' •) ••\. •,: , t.''• :., i ."- /--ft ,--r•'—'i \•ti..//,'•)i '' -.N....71"..''' .. . .. . . , .. • :—1- ‘ s : •••••-•"•7.7...: 7i..... :. ..•'..,;,?:•.... :::i. .......;3 :._, —1 I N : a ',,. i .., "•-•••:--....., ._, ,.. .,..• • --:...;••—....'• • /.,...4.,.....;1. \...'•:•.,--'1••::-":::::-'" k/..! -.. i '-:; rs- I 1.2.-- ...._.!.... ••• ,' - ..../f't.-3. 1 ....•.1. ',...,...=...•:F.-....„,:. --.".--1 : ... •si.f.-.1.:••71. : ., •----s\•*'-.7—•-....1'—'" : 41.41-: a:\t........• I t -7.7.1: '....4%. :C. !; f:::'•,', .'•,','"•:••••=::P'.::;,..•::;:;•.;:•:. :::',..:if;::i::::i::::;?::::::.:::,:::.:.::::::::,:::::,:::;::::::: "•-•::Z-••••, j f;'.!?. .‹:'.;:•:: ::::ii'i:...:i•:': ; •\.. .,., ... .1 j e...:..1 . ..-.:. ,,,,,kr...:.•744,..:-::...::: 7 /-•''' ••?7,' ,:...,,,,,,,.."...::,:::-:,:s,:k.,.....:,:r7...r.:, 'N ., _. .;•..... ., ::::::":::: ::';.:":;.:.:.:::.i::::::::.:.:,,....x.:;;;;,i::.,:: i •••,•‘.. ::.:::4.:&:::i : ja.nmi._..is, i ?..I.I i ..; ----,,,,.....4;:,.*:,,:.i..:.,:.•• .-.r7IIM I- • : . • ' r•1 I ! ---r- .:.:;:,,:":5.:"m•f,.•:*:':':::.:Xni::':::':::':::::".":,...•......::..;.,...:::.:.:,',,,,.....7:: ::::r,„.,; r..r.'•:::::?;.+1::k..I.::':-;?.!,•,: XgRi4t i..... -7- I : .:igivim::mg,:..,.:::K.g.::?:i',.::::m::::::w:•.m:ii:;.&;-\ ,,,i::•::,:mA::• .:::::.,,,, .eika,..e ?i*?;:,•.>•,i.iiki,ii.:.:„i*. n::..m .,;:.:...:.:.. a:,.::, „... tA:,,,•4:4•.:„,,,,,;... .7.,,,:.....i_ .. _. ,.__.,,.c.....,:..7._..; •. ::::::::.:::4•:::.:6,1.::::.,,,,::::::::,,,,,•:„.,,,,,,:,,,,,„:„,,,:„.,,,„,,,,,,,,:„.„,• , ...) ..,:,,,,„,,,,,,:,,,,tv.„,:,,,,,;... I::- '. i--;•-,:- i : . i 1 :":•,,,,,,,,P*...,,,m4sT::':.i,..r:FE:i7i11:: :::,...41.4',&ezo:::4..........4.:ix:iwizt.2,-):4•,::: ::,::.. , • ..:..::::1- ,..i.,-I, I •ff..,.',;.:,:.‘'.;`,..'...."::15,''''...,!..:-....:".'..,:.„.t.7",..7,::?:-.7$:.7.:::".In::::::.:::,".:"...”,:::::::::::;:.:.:.:,:,::;:::..::st:::::,::::::.:,.:':::::::.mgr:.:::.:.-.:.: •.:‹4:::.:.::-:.,:sy....;: ..,...i.,-w.,•,,......,,,.,,,:.•7„14...",:::.:.N.::':•: :.:::.-4,:.:::::.:.:.":::::::::.:;A:.....4,:;;;;i::*:...ii.:**,„*x4:02;:t.„0.„„ ti.f.,._:§tt.:.m.,..:tx..:. :•'''4i'':'13'K<•S'A'r•i.!FN'M:iVagi:i.dfiii::f::?r'C.O.%.itiIII::NXF:%:i:igI':41FrrAtfe'IkM .1:,ia . , .-. . . . .- ... - . . f•‘.1 ..."--!-.--7,".7..••••••• - •.7.2:Wi...ig'...:ZI•,tk::;j:v..iii?.. $.4.•ibg.:sw.,:z.,•;•:•*-A:,•,;..0i1:,•‘!,>;:04:11,, ,:xim•:••••::: iiii / .,.....--,.,\.. : .N\••‘; 1..r- ='':•Z'.e.(//( .:••V:',::tWkfe,'•;:t.4==.4.,.. .:i:::g.::.:::ii'Mii.k.i:U•ntigWaRi!..4.A.:••::•:W:',W,*agi:E..:•%ig , , ... _ , •II: /J''''•-•\ .`..‘...- 1 *V' Ibiiitt:VAIIN.X.P.;1PRiAla•:::,:;Mi:::;aa.U;i0f4ke::: ::•nn.:;;;.,:?••,4.fz.giii;:;4,g,..*?..„;i,..-•::•• 7/ 1)1. :::.::-,‹. 1 -N,,;,:tj :t•;:?.., ;44iA51•:‘ ,..,::?ftAiNM .•:iiiiVi!..Ni•'17:rk§:q:.::•:,i''''"::'''''''''.5,.';''''%i•C::';...si::;i•::::.:,.. ‘r:."•---•• ,,, • •.<\''••••••••"--r.--'s . „op; .:••••;.;,:i<:;:.::.:,. .i.ioi .la..m.,,:ilmi..:,,,,:d,:;::,i,ukl:,g,,...-4,..4ti..;::.?, .;--; !,,I :[ ..,,,,:;:to;;;;,:.. . .,...... i : i .i : \ , .., .7„,„,.., ; , : ; s,..• ,...,.;:;:f.•,:pr..:•;.5.4::„:•,:z:n:,:::::::r-:;w•:.:;:•:•-;...:•:•:-:•••••••••••.:.:.:.•.:.?.:...*?...,:.:........„,..:;.....•:,:...*.:,,:71 1.,„i 1.0•:::.:::•.:::::.:.:•:,::::::••,•:•::•:::: :,•,i,;•:i*,.. N...4.....-..,.... .-..„ -.-••••••......;•••• •_•L . •,....' .I ''..,...M•irff?44.4.1t.:V::".f:5'•:::::.,:r..... ....o........... ............,r•-•"7:12. "...• • ";....:'‘....,•':',%*::•. 1 .,:4'-.W.;... '-::::•1 .. ‘u",i t: .::..:..;,.::ii:::•,i.:ii:Ks.i.f,i,..:.,.:... • .:.:,,,.;„,iii,i, i,.. , :... ' :•••_4:0 •.'' ''',. :Z;1•4°.:':„...t..,.':::7 ;tkl:tti—t-...i I s'f.•-,-:- .....--r.:.Z...rtz-.:L..7::'-•::. ::::::::A:;ii...r.,4:: :ii,,i.:.:.?. .:,....:;::,:i:::::.i4.:,:i:;::,=.,:,", ...„ ----,,:,...... • - 7itkit__ -4-04;.. '-'?.i.'.'77 ....!•772:M*,.. : -i. 77—) i -',ii.' • --.::: ---I.... -4-i::i:i::.:12:;.:.: :: ::...:.:...!:.,:f.:.:.:::.:::,::'1..."',.. :::::-i:;:m:.::m::: ::..::::... .. :::,,s..i.&:.;. ,,::,., ••- 40,4.,"........Wii*A1.----....1.....-7....'........".7-**---".• I•7:::':', -rrrr=7::. ,;.ii:',:r:.i:i..i:: . .1M14.: , ... :: .:ii:•:„..-.„:„.::„,,,::: ::.:]:i:,:: :;:•]... 7P::.. ../4.1 --1:=-i:. _r....."•,,..."1-2.?"12...,i.:.IIIIII.I.i ::.t‹ lli,,tliii.:• : .:rg Acmxi x *::-L.i....:...L. .,>..:-s ;.-- .t. ......'-. 7-.-•....----------.• .,,:.:::::.:*,:*:*i::::::,,,,,,,,,,,:.:„:,,,„:,::„:„„,:,,„,., ,- :::.',7--5.--... : .:. : :::::...,,:......,.....„:„.- ............,........... ...,....„,„.„..... ........... , , ::,:;:;:;:;::::;;;;,,a,,::::;c:f.fpwi.=;3R2,,Aio.,1::im,...,,m:55: ,,..:.:,,,.::,,,,,,.:, t te..,,,c.......41 %..to x,2c.,4:i....-I ‘•,,,...-F"' :., -7-1 . • ,c.,-- ..., .4:.:::::::: :,::.:,..,::..:::::„.:.:,:,,,,::::::::::::.::,:.,,,,,,,:,:.:„,.:i*.%*-:?.::::; :::,i:. :::,;,::::,,.. . kite• .: :+:$34:::::"*. '—' _....-. s;. '...._1 ...::::. i i krTzt.•\ '"•:".''''''''''''',..'1'k"'• •••'-'":::••••::•:::f,i:x:x. 5:E:M::::::..::.,...x:•:•5;•,:;:•:•:,.:,:::,,..:,:•,:•,.:;::?:;i, ,,.•i ".....-•'.i.'4".:*I :::.'.'.. ;:in:!.:.4.:?.:.ai'§.:';'•'•...':;:..'.......... ...::::::::...:::;:,,.::;:z::,::..;:::::: :::::.:::::::::::,.,::::::.,:,;;:4:.: ::::,:,. . W 14:Xt:Wfttl.V.L::1 7 i ! ... •-.ti:: --- ..:.7.77.-":.1 fy.).•:44:::4:e•...,.%e ..:s..;. 1. , .., ,Ki,m,:?..,,,,,,,i..„;:.. ..,,..__..: „... . . . . ....-.\ ... trivt:41...,....44,0*". 4. . -.. .. ... - c ::::::::::.N E:;•::::g*,.... ....,;-..., .':•':.:'7''ZN;........ .)::''''::';':::*':':.';':'.M,i.:. 'er.:::Z -,"•.-<'•7 ...L.__*, 7* Ie ••.***,,>>.•,7 , ......_...._...... --- - • . ;:.i.5..,0:i'i*Inpl Z) • ''',., ,.. *.,:iT.;:,:.•-•-.1.-' •Qc.:.: -•:.,,•:, :f.:: :-::: :::::i:, `,!<,".-i .....................,I. •••••••••••..••••• I '...x *. •'•-•-71‘" • •:•-•04::••••'-0.- •, 1:.z.:i:.:::.:::::::::•::,...:.----•-• . •,,Al2.40.„.„_.....xs.,*,,s„,,,,,,!......„,,t„ ._ ..._........ ..:.:.,.:...:...„.:.::„.:...,,,,,,,,,A , . .•. v,71;a1:4*-4:.• *- •..::---.. • , • 0-4 ,-..--,-. • - -,, ::::;*., ,,.":,", ::•.... , .1.,. ..: -. -...-.,::...:-:.:,...,..,: ::::....::\:.:4:•:,;:,,,::.: .,.:,.,:„.:...,. .:. -- >- 1-e-t.- .. .. ,,....;„.•. ..... fr ...-- ..::::i,..i.::.,:iiii-:i:]-:.,:;:i,:.:;i:,...-,cy..,„:ii•...;;::.:4. ,.:,i,.„-:,.:„„...,::. ...._......_. t ... .. • ..,.. .x.. to. ,, .., , 1 x . .\ ,_ • -% .,„ •-: - -.: „z 1...j \ / , . , „ --"".. •,:-,t,::.,:inn.:.::::,.::ff.:,...:,,,i,..;....:.:....:„.:„:„. ic.,.:4,1„tovi. ..v...;.. 4,9: •....-4-.-:/i T• \--.J " \ \•. ::::Miii:i.,.:.:.*:,iinf.,:•:: :]•::-. • :'-'.:,•;*ii.i .-.::: •...:.,..:.;.:. %,...,.....k,00_-. ....4•4,1....v........., ... ,.......,,.., \ .„. ..........,................... ,................,.,.. , .........,....,...- \ •••16.•4- ' ••••.kt :' 4• '-j I • :•::::::::::::;ii•,:•;i•$i•ir:!::?ii:;4. .,,.. -,-,::::::::. . •:::-, • • •, ... . . . • \ •••, ...--. • : • ''. I I : ,• .-„ •:,„:,:::::::::::::.::::::•:::::::::::::.:::,:', i:: :?:•:,• :-/ •:, , • . / •• ,,. . •• • / •i 7-7.7 Fi7.77,77; Incorporated Areas P&G's I g IK:5;i , A/ 'I 9 0 3 Interim Urban .Jo it Plan Growth Area line 0 1 2 r ... : .."w---------1: =1' pro Line posed Urban Growth Area MILES / / Roads 'rill'''. rna A itm"•a sir, aiii/a 1♦r'7:147 41 a i• i In iii.i J�a � � I♦���iIiimpu t IN 9 4.„,„„„,,,, == �� dijilblrirft" 11iit!- 1411744, 41.1 _'4Ilk lit 'iwigwlV4 41-AVIIIIIMIlawani.‘ 14111411.4•11r4. I ok ... ,, ...,,..0 ...Ili... LI * . ,,,,,..,,ziliw-' imit.,... ..„,,.:. . illoo.-1 , -4 11011110442111111 "4„, *I , .. , _ _ ---„ \IS&— 41V r4 ' mi.. 4 EL • 2, ameau , f... 1 _ ma ,....... i_...........,„ ....„, , ,.... . Ft!' -4#:. 1 , 4.r& ill — , ‘ Ili i It Sunset MT y--- S i I l AIM i y 11/1•1111 i cr.; 1 ` 1 \ i JP ., : ) .. 4\ x,,oAt : 1 .t � 3 a t ws t, 41 . :1 -,: All URBAN GROWTH AREA alOPEN SPACE Unirloorpond Aotivky Canters Joint Planning h - Eat cieaM' ssaq uaMunidpsi Watersheds Urban Growth Area ® Urban CantorsMuddsshoot /u CPP frrtn.werk UGA .,d Rassivadon Exec Prepaid Purl UGA ---T Water Bodies /%. Executive Proposal UGA for Joint Planning Ares ® Parcels RURAL AREA ® Rural Towrr - Forest Production Districts 0 0.5 1 1.5 2 - Aprioultuni Production Districts memo King County PCDD 1994 MILES lose' Noe 11593 ISSAQUAH AREA 2 • The property, which is adjacent to Forest Rim, an existing residential subdivision, has been part of the City planning and was under consideration for annexation about five years ago. At that time, the property owners wcrc not able to provide a separate access from Mountainside Drive SW to the property. This was a concern to the City Council who believed that additional emergency service access was essential. That situation has been resolved and the area for the second access is available. • All City services and utilities can be extended to serve the property upon annexation. This clearly fits the phasing criterion for annexation which states, "Annexation should first occur • to those areas which are adjacent to the existing City limits and to which the City can provide services in a timely and efficient manner." This area is immediately adjacent to the Porest Rim Subdivision and the City limits. • • The forty acres in question arc roughly five hundred feet above the twenty acres at the level of Tibbetts Creek. That land,usually referred to as the Santana property,is under consideration for purchase by King County as trailbead. It should be considered independently of the upper forty acres and has been treated as such by Issaquah. • The forty acres arc in the Tibbetts Valley subarea of the Draft Comprehensive Plan. The uses envisioned for the forty acres have been low density single family,which is entirely compatible with the existing neighborhood character, and which is logical and environmentally prudent given the nature of that subarea. • • During the lima in which jurisdictions are reviewing target population capacity numbers as part of their Comprehensive Planning processes and are attempting to balance varieties of housing for their people for the next twenty years,it is crucial that we work well together and base our Potential Annexation Areas on logical areas of potential growth. 20d .4d20:t 0 r76, 20 •'\ON 0S0 T I62 90Z : '0N ?NOHd 1d3Q S)iZIOn t,snd Nt'rr s I : w0�d E. Noe*or 1 \ -----, \ \ 4:7,11- 1 dvzi 1. 1 5 9 3 ... * ......., ...,,,,..,„,,,„, Sunset Way .... . ,... . - _ _ _ . . .4'• ',.•,'',''' ' ' A 7 SIM"-411 ''.',.* '• ii,J,',_____P,4-air liNt „. .., , ,,... 4,. , z t' 33 i.•.",1''''' ;'4411''f.' ' ''"4,„ir• ';,',...,4. ' "fe • ,`,;„ , 1..z.,,1,, --,, ,,..'7, 1,1'• •••• ." ' '''.. .''''Z RifFi° t1'^ •• 1'.. hk,,,,,,,',..,iiv•r'''''e.1.1,..s V1,4,.1•-,4•Xit; 77;1: .••• 7'''',.4.,:t7rf'lly;:•,——,.,..-A.L...4... ..w.,•. • •— ;•,; ,:- • 7 .1.,:.'t--7-7. • , - ,,,,.,_ ...t : igEr ‘ ' s.i.ss... , '-", t .;,-7.•' _........--— , r',-- ::'•••4 , • . _ .. ; . ail fr URRAR GROWTH AREA 11111 OPEN SPACE * Unincorporated Activity Centers 1---1,_ joint punning - Arse Issaquah - South Inoorporated Cities /i. Munidpi Watersheds • Urban O'Mara Urban Growth Area A/ CPP Tramework UGA and F.-7-4 Muddeshoot Ramarredon bac. Proposed Find UGA 1--- Water Oodles•.•0 Esecudve ProPossd UGA• in ' for Joint Riming Ana EM Pwceis ria RURAL AREA . 0 Rural Towns III FOrilit Production DisNicts 0 0.5 1 1111 Agriaitsiral Production Districts . sosommismi oil cagy PCDO 19.4 MILES CITY OF RENTON • JAN 14 1995 REvL'vtD CITY CLERK'S OFFICE October 25, 1994 Introduced By: Chris Vance him Proposed No. : 94-676 1 ORDINANCE NO. 11. 581 2 AN ORDINANCE amending Ordinance 11446, 3 the 1994 Countywide Planning Policies, 4 and determining land uses and the Urban 5 Growth Area for the City of Renton. 6 PREAMBLE: 7 The Growth Management Act, RCW 36.70A. 110, directs 8 counties planning under the Growth Management Act to 9 designate an Urban Growth Area. 10 The King County Council (council) , adopted Ordinance 11 10450 which directed that Phase II, a process for 12 refinement of the Countywide Planning Policies, be 13 undertaken. 14 As part of Phase II of the Countywide Planning Policies, 15 the council adopted a "framework" Urban Growth Area 16 (UGA) in Ordinance 11446, which will guide the council 17 adoption of a final UGA in the Comprehensive Plan as 18 required by RCW 36.70A. 110n. 19 The UGAs for the cities which were in dispute as of May 20 25, 1994 were designated as Joint Planning Areas in 21 Ordinance 11446. Ordinance 11446 directed King County, 22 the cities, citizens and property owners to complete a 23 planning process to determine land uses and the UGA for 24 each city for adoption by the Metropolitan King County 25 Council. Joint Planning Areas were designated for the 26 following cities : Black Diamond, North Bend, 27 Snoqualmie, Renton, Redmond and Issaquah. 28 From June through September, King County met with the 29 above-mentioned cities to discuss issues, criteria and 30 recommendations for the Joint Planning Areas . The 31 information gathered from these meetings was compiled in 32 the attached report titled "Joint Planning Areas ." 33 King County has considered the city proposals for the 34 UGA and is adopting in its Comprehensive Plan a final 35 UGA pursuant to RCW 36.70A. 110. - 1 1` s 1 1 BE IT ORDAINED BY THE COUNCIL OF KING COUNTY: 2 SECTION 1 . Ordinance 11446, UGA map in Appendix 1 is 3 hereby amended as shown on the attached recommendation for 4 the city of Renton. 5 INTRODUCED AND READ for the first time this 6 day of , 19 9Y 7 PASSED by a vote of /3 to 0 this o?! day 8 of Zi-A-e-,4f , 19* . 9 KING COUNTY COUNCIL 10 KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON 11 P 12 Chair 13 ATTEST: 14 15 Clerk of the Council' 16 APPROVED this G -- day of , 191 . 17 18 ng Coun xecutive 19 Attachments : 20 A. Joint Planning Areas Report 21 B. Proposed Urban Growth Area, city of Renton 22 23 24 - 2 -5 8 1 Joint P Areas Report September 1994 King County Parks, Planning and Resources Department 1i581 KING COUNTY PARKS, PLANNING AND RESOURCES DEPARTMENT JOINT PLANNING AREAS REPORT September 1994 Introduction This report provides joint city/county recommendations, and separate county and city recommendations, where no agreement was reached, for the Joint Planning Areas established by the Growth Management Planning Council (GMPC) on May 25, 1994. Joint Planning Areas are specific areas adjacent to several cities where agreement on the Ur},an Growth Area was not reached by the time of the final GMPC recommendations on Phase II Countywide Planning Policies. Countywide Planning Policy FW-1, Step 8, b., identifies these areas by maps, and directs King County, the cities, citizens and property owners to complete a planning process to determine land uses and the Urban Growth Area for each city for adoption by the Metropolitan King County Council. These Joint Planning Areas are adjacent to the following six cities: Redmond, Issaquah, Renton, North Bend, Black Diamond and Snoqualmie. Three additional reports provide information and prior recommendations on the Joint Planning Areas. The three reports are: Technical Review Areas Report, Rural Cities .� Report and the King County Urban Growth Area: Edge Cities. They are attached for background information. Process Between June and September, 1994, King County staff met with the above cities to further discuss issues, criteria and recommendations for the Joint Planning Areas. County and city staff have agreed on recommendations for a final Urban Growth Area for: Redmond, two areas near Renton, Snoqualmie and one area near Issacuah. Agreement has not been reached on a final Urban Growth Area for the City of North Bend, one area near Issaquah and one area near Renton. Those cities will provide written material to the County Council as to why they do not agree with the recommendations described in this report. Regarding Black Diamond, King County staff will continue working with the city on a recommendation for the final Urban Growth Area for Black Diamond. No recommendation for Black Diamond is included in this report. Pursuant to the Countywide Planning Policies, the Urban Growth Area will be amended in a separate Council ordinance. This ordinance will be transmitted separately. Criteria The Growth Management Act and the Countywide Planning Policies establish the following goals and criteria for designation of the Urban Growth Area. King County and city staff have used these goals and criteria, the policies of the Countywide Planning Policies, the Executive Proposed King County Comprehensive Plan, and the vision provided in city comprehensive plans to make recommendations for the final Urban Growth Area. • „Ng,. 15 8 1. Growth Management Act RCW 36.70A.110 An urban growth area may only include territory that is already characterized by urban growth or is adjacent to territory already characterized by urban growth. Urban Growth Areas shall include areas and densities sufficient to permit 20-year population projections. Urban government services should be provided by cities and urban government services should not be provided in rural areas. Countywide Planning Policies LU-26 The UGA shall: Include all lands within existing cities, including cities in the rural area and their designated expansion areas; Not include rural land or unincorporated agricultural, or forestry lands designated through the Countywide Planning Policies plan process; Include only areas already characterized by urban development which can be efficiently and cost effectively served by roads, water, sanitary sewer and storm drainage, schools and other urban governmental services within the next 20 years; Do not extend beyond natural boundaries, such as watersheds, which impede provision of urban services; Respect topographical features which form a natural edge such as rivers and ridge lines; and Include only areas which are sufficiently free of environmental constraints to be able to support urban growth without major environmental impacts unless such areas are designated as an urban separator by interlocal agreement between jurisdictions. LU-38 The UGA for cities in the Rural Area shall: Include all lands within existing cities in the rural area; Be sufficiently free of environmental constraints to be able to support rural city growth without major environmental impacts; Be contiguous to city limits; Have boundaries based on natural boundaries, such as watersheds, topographical features, and the edge of areas already characterized by urban development; Be maintained in large lots at densities of one home per five acres or less with mandatory clustering provisions until such time as the city annexes the area; 2 a H 5 8 ). Be implemented through interlocal agreements among King County, the cities and special purpose districts, as appropriate, to ensure that annexation is phased, nearby open space is protected and development within the Urban Growth Area is compatible with surrounding Rural and Resource areas; and Not include designated Forest or Agricultural Production District lands unless the conservation of those lands and continued resource-based use, or other compatible use, is assured. The following material is organized by city and includes a recommendation for urban or rural designation of the Joint Planning Area, a presentation of factual information, analysis and a map of the Joint Planning Area. Where no agreement was reached with a city (One area of Renton, one area of Issaquah, and North Bend) the city recommendation is attached, or is forthcoming. 3 • 5 8 it Redmond Recommendation The City of Redmond and King County staff agree this Joint Planning Area should be designated urban. Facts ■ Approximately 15 acres ■ Outside interim UGA. ■ Designated rural by the 1985 King County Comprehensive Plan. ■ Current zoning under the Northshore Community Plan is A-R-2.5, one unit per 2.5 acres. ■ Adjacent to the King County Agricultural Production District. • Current annexation petition under way for the Betrozoff property at the south end of the area. ■ The King County Council denied a proposal to rezone the Betrozoff property to one unit per 35,000 square feet during the Northshore plan review. • Subdivided into eight lots, which could be developed at densities greater than zoning would otherwise allow. ■ The City wants this area to be designated urban. • The City recognizes this area as part of it's community. • This area is not needed by the City to accommodate projected growth. Analysis Designation of this Joint Planning Area as urban is partially consistent with the Growth Management Act and the Countywide Planning Policies. This area is adjacent to areas characterized by urban development. It does not extend beyond natural boundaries, respects topographical features and is sufficiently free of environmental constraints. However, the area is adjacent to an Agricultural Production District. Both the Countywide Planning Policies and the Executive Proposed 1994 King County Comprehensive Plan have policies that direct buffering next to agricultural areas.(Countywide Policy LU-4, Comprehensive Plan policy R-205) In the King County Comprehensive Plan, policies direct low density rural zoning next to agricultural areas. However, due to the small size of this buffer area, and a commitment from the City, to ensure that development will be clustered away from agricultural uses, King County staff agree with Redmond staff that this area be included in the Urban Growth Area. The City recognizes this area as part of it's community. The City of Redmond states they will keep this area low density, require clustering along the road, prohibit development on the lower slopes and valley floor, and efficiently provide public facilities. The City states that conflicts with agricultural uses would be minimized by the elevation of the property and a road, which separates the Joint Planning Area from the road. The City of Redmond would like to discourage proliferation of septic systems in this area because part of the city water supply comes from wells. 4 1 A. 0 81 r'' 1 ,,... ., . . ,....., • Redmond - . North - Urban Growth Area . . : . . . • _ —.4 : I ; I !'.,''.! 1..12-3.i.L:1.1,'.,L4-12:—•••;'';---:: _ • : "-_4,-- :I—, ----:..i H- '. :"1 i : 1—•.: -,-...,. : i 1 :: 7-'l." i--;•-•`•" L::::--4-. .... .-. I,. ---- i ! , .__.. ..• . ; .\,-\ .1 `1 ' :_J-- :i 1 : ''''—'' :-. • ....I ' i — .—'''''''!:z.':..::"..--.:.'---,=--,:: —.'--: , .::..1 ' ..,- •• —':.—:—.::: --. —f•: ) ...,...r..,-........,i—i,7''si, .•-•:'''' '-• — ' I l'-----'''''I, ' ''' : 1 1 r •'I — •• ."••• •',-;....'..1:;,..:.i. J 1 :,.....\;t• ...i, 1 \•,... \... i ...j•,\:,---. . . • .. • 17'':......7 _ ...... ! _... ...-.3...:.:..1.:-:..x• - ""•-•••— ...--v '.-..----- .--:-... -r•• -'''."Tr- • • I '..4,.,L;- -i...• • • 1 • • 4 I "‘ / \'I••••3.<-•/ ......J...... , •.i., •..:_.1 r .. -, ,\...:2•- -,--,.. . :Ls,-,"t • • •-1 i . 1 i • '"' - I • .-:..._._. -•-,- -i:.-• I. . •::-.--....-\-,1f( --.- • ...,.),,,, .1.. , , :•• 4-t.,L.f.)<:***:;!"• i ---- 7-- - 1 '" ' • " • • . ---....1.-}•- 1 .1 ,; •,*•:‘ '. i ‘; 1" --I-4„, ; ..,I.'. '. ,I....'",'•• „A. ,.....i.-•.!...'.....!. 7....:... 1.---"\/-- • - • --,--.,- .;.•., \ ; 1 ; .....,-i i '', \\\>•.•./s1./.''eN I 1-: ..:... : : • • ! / '.. : : i I.: \ : ' • ... : 1-- , '1E•••••\..i '---",;- '•••••-.-.1-!--"••• . '• .,-:•-•,(••••,---y-•,•?;-•,-/),•-•-•••••••-• ,„. --,--,--, '1 ‘...... : !--- / i : . \ ',. -;'....!-..,': • j•...:,, I -',. .;i • ! '-'- : •'':;:2..i.'..i.:•-: • :. -L /I ..:\.---.1 %::i/ ..* \ I . l ''' • ''%•'•".."•-•‘.Xv• :''''.... . : . '! ' ' i ! •-•Al. -.?J• -• "-.....".:: •) -•-• ••• i • !i i 'v.:. .,_ ... ...\•• :•• ' \ "' • ''' \-•'')! .'•=s,'. ..•'k• : :+•-),---. l ' t ' Li..!• L:,..• : : .1:'•;.:_-.,--[.• • L: ; -7 , ,/,, %>,.,;••1' \ \ I' ''''• ' ...,72. .•••' '.•)-.., ,'•-; ;.-- ---•-•••;_i 1 ---1 j 1-.:_.7 ;-,--. i' I--••-•'. : % ,.!i : '• \ \, ••/- •-, ' _•• • i •••;:-‘ t'>4-. — : . • l •.1-...7.-:....1-1 '.- ;-'••Z':: ..--i----1 i'i's .• ! 1,/•.`- \ ;:.:•1 ......._ ...............,. ..._,_z.,..-..,.- -••• I- i 1 • • sr";„,,,, i•:. .(.:)-'-'''. c.....• -: I '....,-; i :••••••-1.1.),--• - -- 7.- 1 ' 1 i .,-- \•---1IL-- .... •-•,..,-;,,.........--,-...,!..•••• •••••••:,__...•, ,.:,...i.j_..........-- ; .., \...- ..-:-.... ...-1:;1".._••••••7, : : :,.._:_:........,....1...4--;f 1,,..,E...:.'„:1:.:. ,,,.....,,'EE:y.••••••••.••,/...,..-:'•••;.;.. .•:,,,,,„ ;.,...i : : i ':-.1••;I ' ill,., \<,-*".." ,•,•-• „„„,...-.7••••:' • • • 1. i••-•,_4 "E : 1,._E-.;......... ;',7,-.I.,<, •••2i:•,7:•-z-,i: '• '•--•• •-1-'" ........ • • • i .;.,:... _..„7„i_ 1 : • ... Iir !. ./--)"-- - -''-_,---..'... .. 71 f--"•-•1 *.•• 1-7-;•• • •, .1 ^,•"1;-<,. •,.••,..z.;•:,...t:.,J.. •• • : t 7 E , ...,........... ...••, •:.7„t.:A.-.87,..),.. TE: ji i l_,i ,C.... - , : 1.....:•-•::-••••••,:""!-.-r••• .k'' . '.---• 1 .—•.i .-..-.:.:,..;,,,,,,•-• !....• ... • .7,... 1 ... :',;.3.,*.,;•1.1 ......s. . '.......-....:•'•,... .'• ' 1%.'/J , ,,..1.:•1.4)c7;.,?:•,,,,,.,,,,,.....r,,,./ •. )......; ! .7.. .1:••4:-..,1..*:',:,r.i.' : • f.•; ;; . -• ....---.....'.....L•-... "'""".•'.. • -'! ';...-‘-.'•:.-K.1-,2,--.: I-7';-,-•":::..^:'.1:7,77,7: .?;.'....ir..--„-1 :. . i-,-..-r-:•• liali•:2•,..,: 7...fd4.1-: :.1..t.i.:..:- i ' ..;.:...•--, ''-t --.:.:1 J-• : •• ; :...:,,..;7-.1••••: 0.'4:Y.',:-.•-•::', 7-.-\•."....;,??......., . 1 , : , , ; , '-''' •y-•;',...:*:::,.:.4.::71-;:' I I/ :4, ....,'".." i.I l---f i 1-..- ----, • ...,..--i•-,-.. •.-..'2,-..,- ..-:.••,71,:is.,.,--:-,...,..,-,-,1 i . : ( i 1.....: iv. ,• •••, L.. •—1 .--i-i.:.:.1-?-:-,...L.., . .--...2::.r.,•,--7, •:••••••••.----,_L.,. .—_,....,:,,..,_ --:: ..:-J,,•••••,•.7_•s...;,- •......,..,.....—. h a • :•,....,..1....ti.;• . , :: I . •/:: / .,!.1,...1 1..;......;:',.."..L.4.1.:.:.:. -: I . ,,•....!.-7,../ '....., s• a 'I71. ..........,.., i : a i .....—: L'•••?••''''".•••!... Lt:i.....: I!•-Lr/.'.f'-',....../..:;.:.. -: '''''••1,!"--i. .1.:-1-..! : h':-/..•.'...... '..... —.—....44.---......_':-.7-.;!..,:<.;.1.7 :..!... ...:•/-t•-•/..,••-;•-, \\I•,. ... ••;;;,...;......:•: 1 I:. :,.—• i I 1-..*:'.....•.,-,... ., ,-i ' il , -.1 ' .. n.r:;% --. ........ . . r, , ...-4 -,-...• •I'',..- ..•—-I • ,' v.'.;,...1„..2,:.:.; s.,-;I"•r;;, .. \.: i A ..I, I . .--1--f•••77,-f•‘..,.!r.....":.':s' -•-.-'''..7,:_'7,..,.' ' • ' '•• ' ...-:-. .:..:.--. — ........____ i .. - ..._;'-'........." • _._:•:,..,. , y;:... -.4:,ii • , ' ; ; --;._.,....,-4-‘....71-rf-...--4 ;•;'.7.;•.4,........-)...:.''..' •.... At w 1 ' I : : ,,-: .; :.;;;;;Ti. _:,..j.1 C.......t.,;_.r.'4"17 7".:.,,,`'''';'.-'s. i-1•••,,,.; ...,..,:-_'.....C i -•'. 1 ; •:';; • i.---1 i:-i:::=1 . ..: ..1i<j?i.z....1.. %*.t,•77-,H.- i .....i... ...:'2....:;---. ____!..?:'; • i P.! •• /----: •.."-IC:1,' ' --; •.'.. : •----4-q.:..! : I• t -,-'-;--•-••• • -•••-•s•-•tt,..:(_--_, ••:7,•--•k-...-.-..:..._ / i:- :i : -.---H- .. "-, i.....:- , ' : • '_-_p-i-,,,••••4 • 1...:. :.:2.•••• ....----N.. '...1'..42;.7:fr•-• : .•'. .-# - .:.........;, . • • I i..[-:•:„.r-, ••,., •••,' .! :•••-•-1-ir-I 'i '/ /4 • ! .: i E •._-... i.„.-•••,.<7., ••• : ; : :....";- . / • • 1 10 : _ \•• I —1 . , • 4 h ' ,S t i ...• ••_. . CD . . . _. . .. . ,...: : i I ...No, . . . •,..:,.-.!:,,,,i i:;,;.H-::::;••••••:•,:-L-::::., ..'''',S•••'"i.....1:.-7.'...‹.'t !--I-T-'''.; I I . ., :•/ ........777.1..7.7.',;•,•••:-.:.::'•••••• •••1-•:<. _L',/. ..7+,-..:72::-....7:::::. ::•.t..i..._ LNE 1 2 . . t : : _ - /.., , .. „.,...,,,::::,..,:.,-„....,.,,,T.,....i,:::::,,.:.:: ,_:-.,:. . ',;:•'-'.:-.ii-. .-.', :-.....---- .1-::•••.-::::',--:•...-:'..",.."- ; "'1, .. , i E'L,,,,:..,•••••:.:1::::::,....:ii1:,.:::i...:*;:iA::-:::::::.:aiii —.•...!..,:........ ,;;.......1-7:•••••••;•....:: ::"• "..........;:;...::-..,....1..::.--.••••,:,..7...:::: :?7..:::.: .?:-......r:.77,:::;i::.'77.:.;.'•';'i:..::i::::i::-:::...::, :•:•::;;•••.-:-••--••,.:-:;•..:•:.:i,:•.:::::-. ;:,:::.,,:!,:;:::;.•,:•,•ff.,....:::.:;:;::;,... ;:;:•.:;::::.::::::::;,;.* -.;.::.;::.:...;::::::::::,;:•:*:::::..;.-:::::::::::-::::::::::;•:::::,....i,:i.:•.:::::.:...:::::::.:•h::::::....:•:..::,.:::::::::.::;:•;,..;:;; :::':.:-.....'-;i'....:,:'•:-';'.i:::,:::,>.‘.''..• .. ...'''' . ..."".•-:-1.. -.::.:," "1 ..:i: ".'-:1'':-.'.' . '. ' • .',:?'.:•.<::,:i'A;,•:::%.i:,:,•,': :.,':: ::::i*::::::.*'..1:.,*,*;:::::..:::::::-.:i.......... .,:::.::::,:',::: :::i,.:...:.:.•,:..-„:......i,...:.;,:;.....f....::::,..:,:,;:..,,...,...;-,...,::::;..q............. ..,-..-..i „....n1.........,::„.::•.;:-.-:,.-....:1:::::......:.....::.....•,:..-:•..:..1-:,-....1,.-••••:: •-•-•-.--::-... - • .- ..•••••."_.-..• . 7''''''.-! .,f,i';'.-..:,.: :.]:.!..: ,!,'.i::::,.. .'A!-...:::!,;',-.,: •1.4! .?..,: .:.-..:.',.':,,.,.*,:i.•:;!.•..:'., .'...:., ..,.:..,-.:,;., •7.--•.:.,:•:. .,....„.:...............•.....:• :....._,., ::....,:. ..,...,....:. ....:.:.• •••, . : ......._,._: . ,.. 1 l'•••:::::-:-.•,$:•..:::::••:;:•':.;.:::'-'•:;;,:•:;'•?:::::::.:::•:::::,,a;::.;:•i: :. .• '.- •••••• ''''-'.• ••••. ••'..:......••••• •••:.•••••••••:•••. /••s-''• 77:7--7:•„,„,....".1::-4-7-7: : •.•.•;.4L.:•,••.:.:1;•;.';•i.• ..i..:f';-:;••;'_L._•,i••••••.....'.',•4..f•-____.:,- .;.. ,. ........,... - : . ...r._.,_,./._.. 17•77:77:ai:••••••:: ::::::•::: :::::i:EE•..i.:,..E.••.Es.*':::,•-:••••••;:•:•.EiE:,E;E:.Ei::;...,;:i'iiEE:.E:::E•iii•Ea:E•..,E•,•;E:.E•:•,::::•••.:::::E.1•,:.:.::::::.:,..E: -:::...•,:E:•::•••„•.,',;.E:••••••• •--> :..7.,,,..;,;.....f.'......:ii...:.:1....',.:'...:.].i.::: ::::.•:•,:::.:,:•1 L.L...-.....•...'::: i:•....:........ • .;..-:i :.•. .•.:F.7. ....:•...;L:•••;1 r:-.7.--...77-•••-•.;,,••••-. -•'''';'..:'..':::*::::;•';.;•;';',..•-•;;;;;;;;;; .....;;;:•:::•:,::::,..,..:,:•:::•:::,:::::::::::::::.:,•,„:•„;,*:::.::;;:::::::;„,:•,;.,,,: :::,-,.,:::::::•:::.::;-:.:.,:,.:::J.'....::.. Y''''...-'•>• --•-••;-•••!.7.7.7',::'!.::,'...'.::,:•::...:,..l.: :1:::.,..:,.:-:....:::;;:;;;:.::,'.,....,..:.<".:'.•17..-.,?..,...2...:•-•••:••••• :::::: .j::::...• : :•.::•;.7.,7•,•'7.--•-•.:,7l..,,,.;/...,...: a::.j..;:sitiq.....:!..ii.igil.jiliR:gi...l:'...;'•::.i..':ii:i;.ii.:M•gli'.:l'il•l:.•:..::::•:...ill...:::ll:l.:l:•:.:lir- •'..:::-.::;'.....;.'...,': ::..-1'..•''.l.:'::•l,.::.•i-•:,• '*i •.......-•"•• i-••••,,.'•. l:•'..:.;.f:....;':fl.'... :,:'".i.•••••.•.":•.-.7-••:.:--;•:•••.--7.--;1:: ::::-.5:,-.?:,:i,i6•.. :.,:i..;•.: .;. -...7„..,..,.. •-,. ,--••,,..-,. ;::•:::m;.;i;:.::::.,::f::;,;i?:;:.;:.::.,.;:.::::.:;..•,.•,i:•;;:,•f.,.:•.;.:;:;•;:;:;z:•:.::••,••::•:•.::::,,,,,,,,,::::•;•,:,::• :.,:,::::-..:,,,:":::•:::.•:.•-•:‘,:::--.:::-..::,.,s.. ::...::::•-.,:i-,,,,,:::•,...:i:....,N.E.:::.,:,,.,:,:l.,....1,......6t _ .;.,•:„.... .. t,.:,..,..... :,_!..,. .:„..:...,..,.... . , .,..._ ,_ ,,:,:.,.......„„„:„.„..„.,„:„:„:„..::,:,::.:,,..„..:...:,„,„,...,„„:„„,:,„:„,,..„„,„„„,„„,„„„„:„.,.„,:„,:. :„....:„.„..:.......„..::.„:„....:::.:::,....„....„ >,,.. „:.:.::::,......,:,„..:::::::.:::,:. , .. ....i :•:,..,.:„:„.:.: .. :.. , .1,1_•.::.,•••„.D.. :•••_,.:. :.:.,.: ..•.:.:..:.•.. „..: .........,: I ..71.,,:::::',:§,.. .....:•.,:::•: ..?.:.,:,...7:V*:.:i*:.s.,ii. . :..••.•••..:::''•.... ''.'•'''.--: •- • ' 1:;'''''::::::.*::''''''''',',''''...,.:':.,:',',1:::.:::::::',:'....':::::::'-''''''''''.--.....:-..-.. ..............,. ..'.....--......-.1:,::::::;.1.....::..:: ..::.,:.'.,::::.:.:.3....,-.,...::::::::::...,..:-.)......),:::::..'.,i:::...:-.3.i.-.....:.i.:3i:i:i,:i..is*:',.:-,:-...i...:::::.3,....,:.:-..::...::::..-..:J..:...:-.:....::.:•..-.::-.f.,-.:i.:::.::::,.:...._. ..: .::.: ...-.. :I..:....L:.-..1-..-; .1 • c.,.. .,.•,iA:::••,.i's; .'N'ii.,.:• •••'-';'-.'s:H:-.:::.•.::<'•••::::' .:.::•:',:.•i.',•:•-••:i :•:.:i.:i:..0-.••..:';'•.%:-:',',•;;*..::::::::;i:i•••:.:•.•3:•::::,.i'-•?3•5. -•:,.;'..."-;•ii.:'•UH.,i:'..-•:','::-..-4:::,•:•••••:••.-•••!, '-??.?;.•,,',:',,,i,'•i•:-:..3.::..*:.3,..-::.,,:..:.:.,.-:, ,.:.,., ::.!......,..:m.,:,:.i.-..>.-:-;,....:::::.-,.,..:•:.,..:.,....:::...=.:::,....•:.:•i...:'•:--::.;-;:,-;,;..-ii]..,w-:::-:••:-,;-.3. :,....i,...:-.::::-•::::.:..:,..:•...-.-::.1•-...-:,: -L-.--.• ,A::..': . ... 4. 1 :'-'•-:<':::•-",: :::::::::::•:,i,'".'-?--is.-,:i::--.':,:::?...,-\ 7 ::i:i,,,,,.*::Kr_*::;:i:,:„..:....,.,.,::,: i,....„.:.:::::::::::.,::,:::::::: :.::::,;,„..*.:::::,::.:.•.:,„.,...„,„.:,.:,:,:?„ d E'..::.:•: ':...,::;:':;ii.,',..:?..-...,:;;';':•: :::i'..,:.•%.:.: .%1.:':a...:gM.:... ..::V.:!.: :•!.. ...,;,::i,:.•' .:.:,..T.Z'.n•••:.;••-i:•-i',0.; ;r.,:::;:.•g;',.j:... •:...*::::.;:sl.il:::.:::::••::::::•l.il;l'il,.liiiip:::]'•*.;:-:,:l.:.l..i...:,.:,.l*::::J...iflftiM:....,,..:::::,..;:..:',.•;:lrl-•;:l.::::•Z:::::.i;::::,•-i-•:::.-:il . .-:.p..::::: ::. 1•s,,..,1::::.1..-.,11-.,....-....,...-:: , :i ..; •• .... ,••>„.... : • ) '.7:::::?:.:5:.:::":::.s.:':'''.:;].. ..'...:::::?:::::'..:::.i:'::::.:::'::::::::•:.--....:.::.P.'"-.- •,'i.:':''::' :i'..:.i•:.i''.1:.1:..;.='.•'.'•:.il'.l..il::l'•'•:.:::•l;-lt:.:.ill.: l:l;'i:':•'::;:: l::.,:.:::::. ':,:l':li:.i:i'Vl.':l.;.•.M•'.••••.::.l:..i:••.l!i•:::!:-..g!:.!:;.i'...l; ;•..:l ;i:i:':i: :.. : :•:ilili.l.:•il.l: l:.: :l':l:.il '..-g•:''•' 'El:• l.:l:•l:,:.:l:' 7.7•':r:77•-•.:)L•j••-•••:—....:.. 4--• ' 1.).:,.:1?;.:•:....•. ,:::5......... :',...;•.:',.l2:!!::::;:,,A:',:t....:;;;:::i;!;: :: :.;:•-..i:::iiil':,:?..•-.:.:::,:::•::.]:i':ili:iii,?.:iii;.iiiii:iliii•:: ::.:i.ri?.iii::::li?illi,..:ift..:i:I'li::...!:.i .'Ii'l2.!:.,:::::•1:!:i,•::.i:liil.,..:::ii...:::::.-,i..X..:•'....:•::ii... ?:.,,::iili.::.::::?.......-.....uiliiiiir.-....:.iii]y•.•,..T .: ,:..v.::::.:i.::••..i....:::;*p :vqT:il...:.-.;,-:,......-:,:,...,,...:H .-••- il'••••:!:::::..ii.::::.!:::'.P.....-•:•'-...,.::..':•::.:...':?:'-'•::::::::.,::•'?e•iM.•.:'::: ::•,...........•••••••-:::::::::,;•••?;...:::,...,,,,::::::,.•:,•::•::::::-.•::::::::::,,,...::...:•:,.......::,,,,:•:::::::::::„„•..... •::.......„.....::::::::::„...:.i.,........................., ............ ::::.........„..„.„............„..„....„...,.....„..„......„„..„.... ...., , ........,..... ......... ,....,, ,____....._ '....'''''''''''..."*".''''''''''''''''''':":'::: :---.'•4::.**.f..:*:':',':::l,::',':::::::'''.,::::.::::'''''''''''''''l•*?':•-•:,....ff:::,:............,r....:-.:••••:::,:,::::::,.:::::::::,•:-.;:li•:•fil:l.:-.......::::l:l••::2-.:••••,f,',.:::::':;;:l.:::1:::::.fl:i:::::: :::::...........:::::::.,:,-,,..i..:....„.;.::::::,.<„,•••••,::.::„.i.:.,..?...:: : ::::,,,,: k.,.,,...::,. .;......„...;;:.;;: .. ;1 :::'..'.k:::.'.::.;?;:::a::.:::::::.*::::..,..::•;........'::::::.....*:..•:.:.:''?.:.0:. %.......;:...:;.;. ..:::::::...i....:i:::::,,: i-i'....'.;;''.':"?..":::.i''''''':':•:::':'''::',';,::::,':•.'.:',:',•:.','•',',:::;':,::'ci'.77,..':.;:.i.,,..;.:.,.......:.:..,.:...-...:::::::,:::::::::::,::::',,::: ::::::.:7.,:1::...f....i.,:„:„„:::::.::::::::.:]:::.,..i..,„....„:.:.,::•,..-;,:.a:::::„„,,,:;„,..,..*:, ...,::::.....„:.,::-.,......,..:.::::::...i*::,,nr7:7,r,,,„,,...,...... .., . 1 4-7.7 .','4,'::::;...Lii...-.H.:..'.f.,ii,.:;.; ;A:.:.....;. ::;:..N:''.:-..:: ::?.::1::;...:;:i;c:::::::..,..:::::::'...f.•::.:...,.,:.: :'.i.:•0•i;::;:.:::;N...0.....Ei..'.i,I .::.;:...:',.:::. •,:,,,:::•::::w-....,.......:::::•::;:.:::,:...:::::,.....,::::::::::„.ff..:::.::;::::....:.,:::',:::.',:::-...,...,.:.,....7:7..]..::-.,,....:...-...,-.::;:::::::::-...:,:;..„.-..:;',*:-.:::::::...-.,...::::::..,:..,•:::::,,,,,-,,......,,,..::',..:.......:.,..,::.::,:::,..,:,,,,,,..,:...„........,..,, --,-7- 1 11';'-'1.:'.11:.-:" ..;'.:::.ri.'s'.*'...i: ::::.: ;1::.'::::;::;. ;: ....''.•::::7'....:..:•: ::•:.:: ::::::::::.:ii:::::::::::ii 'M;HM........ .:•0:.::::.:.::',;:l::•:'::.'-'.*•-..'.....:.:".1.-.-.:.....i.:.i...,..::-...-:.".1.:':"...:...:...•:.:•.'.••I.L•,;':'''i.':'''..L'.'h‘.1..-;'::.;:•,-'::..'''::..i....;;..''::.:':'';::i:':::':.•:.,:..''',:'.i'5:'.:;ii''i'';1f.•,:;:....L::',.:;i:i;,':';i:::'.L,.'-.';:.':;;,;:i''i.;.i.:::::.'l11i.:l•.,..•'.:. ..•*:'":':•.'!::':...:.:::..":7•.,',,,..,.:.,:YK::•::..:.::.:.:,n:,;:..;,::.,.::..•:.,::•;.•,::',..i.i..:.'1...::.......;..;,:..:.':...,:.;..,;:.:,.:;...:..;:i:.*'i:*7,::.;:.,:::::::::::]::::::;;:,,,i:a:::::':i:i..:.:i:i:i.;.:.:i:i::'i''..ii':...::,•.:,:.:$..',::::]:c:.:::.•::.:::,:•:::?..:.;-.i:}:N::.1s:':...:...::;!::?:',:::l.'I.,.;:,:;'.:i:':-.*:.i.:;:•-;.\..]:'.;:;l.,,;-.?':.;...:?,.:;:.'•.;:g;,!;:".'i...;'..,,:;:‘'::..,:::.;....-','',;;: : 0 :1, g . .,.;,.M::..:f':;'::;'•:;i;.i:::.A'...i:':,,.';-.':R..::::?.:::.::;0:M:i:,•,;":::-,;::i::i:,;,'::i:i::*.•.:;::.?:•:';.,•:;•:.:.':,•,]...::.•:.:,i...::::...:;i:,..,,:•*,::': .?',;::.:,:.;:.:.;;::i.;:::.:.:..,1.:,...:.:::i:i•.;:,:,::.::;::,:::,:.... , * : ::.::..,..: , :..:.::..,....:..::::;,:;:,:.,,.:;:.:....;:,sr ... , ..,................. 1AP '....'...'.:.'•.. ..'...,' '''.... .. . . . 17...-1.••..'...^;';•;-;.--1'"•--- 1 :,•:•.,.',:••,•.'.' ."'•-•••::•-•,".'•";:::,:':i'i';'-':::':.''''''''''''''Y''.:=:',.. .-.Z:•::::::::;..;,:;:.,:i";.'..>'..:.::,::,•.:...;.•:.:.•.......•••,....-...,,;.t.•:,“-;,..:......,,,,,,,,-,--•-•••;•--- r77.77:771 In.,:orporated Al BaS N Road [il...:•:•...,:',::::i ) i .i l Potential Annex Percale Area i : • Fi • '-'; i".1 Joint Planr. '!•:;',,,,>/.: N 1992 Interim Urban Growth Area line A.;68 MILES .• . .•. Proposed Urban Growth . ••• Area I in. :i•••;, C :-.••; PCDD 195/ . . ,. . . .,. • . . ... ., ,. • �. 158 1 . Issaquah Area 1 Recommendation King County staff recommend this Joint Planning Area be designated rural. The City of Issaquah recommends this area be designated urban. No agreement has been reached at this time. Facts ■ Approximately 60 acres. ■ Outside the interim UGA, designated rural. ■ Designated rural by the 1985 King County Comprehensive Plan. ■ Current zoning under the Tahoma Raven Heights Community Plan is G 5, one home per 5 acres. ■ Outside Local Service Area for sewers. ■ Existing low density development, with three churches and scattered single family residences on large lots. ■ The City of Issaquah wants area to be designated urban in order to provide sewer 40 the churches if needed, and to square off the city boundaries. ■ The City has no plans to annex, provide urban services to or develop this area. ■ Churches have not requested to be within the UGA or to have sewers extended. ■ Residents in the area have expressed considerable opposition to an urban designation due to significant environmental constraints which are mostly wetlands. ■ The area is not needed by the City to accommodate projected growth. Analysis Designation of this Joint Planning Area as rural is consistent with the Growth Management Act and the Countywide Planning Policies. This area is not characterized by, or adjacent to areas characterized by urban development. The area is not sufficiently free of environmental constraints. The City states they can provide urban services to this area within the next 20 years. However, this area in not needed to accommodate projected growth and there is no immediate or anticipated need to provide services to that area. The area does not extend beyond natural boundaries. However, it is distinctly separated from the city by a major road. Many of the residents in the vicinity of the Joint Planning Area have expressed concern that the area is rural in character and should not be designated urban. 5 • 1 5 8-1 • Area 2 Recommendation The City of Issaquah and King County staff agree this Joint Planning Area should he designated urban. Facts ■ Approximately 40 acres. ■ Outside the interim UGA, designated rural. ▪ Designated rural by the 1985 King County Comprehensive Plan. ■ Current zone under Newcastle Community Plan is Q-M, quarry mining. This zone was designated to recognize existing use and to allow quarrying and mining activities to continue to operate. • The site has a buildable plateau and an approximately 600 foot slope. There is a sand and gravel pit at the bottom of the slope. • The City wants this Joint Planning Area to be designated urban. • The City wanted to annex this area in 1992 but the city council voted to deny it because of access problems. ■ The 40 acres is adjacent to a subdivision on Squak Mountain. ■ Developers are proposing to build 25 houses on the buildable portion of the area ,. and provide another access to the subdivision. • The area is not needed by the City to accommodate projected growth. Analysis Designation of the area as urban is consistent with the Growth Management and the Countywide Planning Policies. This area is adjacent to areas characterized by urban development and can be cost-effectively served by urban governmental services. The portion of the area that the city would allow to be developed is sufficiently free of environmental constraints, does not extend beyond natural boundaries and respects topographical features. 6 ... .,, . . , I ssaq u a h - East Urban Growth Area •," • ........... .........,.,...,,..„.„.•„„,:,,:.,;.,..,... .,,,,,.::,v),.,-.:--,,,. -,\. „- ... .::-. :, .,./.. ...E.••: i• 47' i ''':. !• •''' .•.•...:.•:•:.:•:;:,.-::',..,:.::,..,-. ,•'•:•:•.C- ::s. :.'... ..: :;'"4 d :.,.. . 1::17 i I..:...•..1. 1 ..i .:::';',...:. 1:::.',.:::'-.t:.'..,.i.::::::': i': .'.:;:',:.•''':''i'•.'4" .'''.‘') .'''....;:::i::1.g...41).Pit\'':;'%.:Ii1:7`Z i:/..7i i:•::: *-IL:j.,;?. +:".:.--m,iili... e ..;-.1- •••.....1.i -17-•!.'''.','- '.:774.'--*-,.'''' 71"'."*.4•.i......- '.77:77:777-7::::.7.77.771 .777.7.71::&7A....".;...':.'i.:':'•:,....*:17:1:•:::, . :. ..1.71t.:;...,.!::-.:; :,i,.:: .: -.,;--....:..;-i-...; _.„3 .;::::'.:•":•. .•:j:::•,': ':••: :.::::••••••:..:;- :•:.••::.-.1-"..".1.•'.•.:.:...',:.:E:..••• ::::•••'; •:i : ••••:•••••::,,••:•;:r.•:E:.:•..:,.,:. .•...ii•:•••V:•: :::•:::.'•?•:••••:':•.:•:,i-•":•,::::!; 7%.:1%:-...:71.7::.Y..../7::1.i::',:f:•.::::..:::-:77.•'.'............:".91." • ,,:•,--.:::..\ -,.; • ::!::i i:i:',':'•.,....•I i:::::: :.i--1•.'-. :-.se':.,:::::::..F.•:::::::,,• .;.....:.•;-. :.' 1 . ;/..ri'•,?: : -....:::•::::•.?::.:::.'..,,,,.,.....i:::::::::•;....../..:',!!: .. ..'. '''''''''.1':':•1':ri4,:.:11::::,..-...::-::::::::-.:j-.7. 3-::•'..• ,....:i.•::: .....:.--i..;:',,i:i::!1i.:-,:,•::.::•..:' ::::::':.;:i.'''... ".:-•:.:-: ":'':1••::',•"•':•.'•..I.•." 'I"'T.1•.1 '•-= -,...:::;i:.,...:::::...,,..:::.::.:::::.:.i..'..,..: ::::: : :::-.iii;•:'.i.. .::..i:.:.,.‘,...%,,,, ...-•:i!.,::•-i'li.•.',4••••.::,.."...7:1'.'•'.'::.::::::.777''•••:•::•:•::.i•i:i "•(-i.fr,,... .:-..:. *...:::].......i.:::-•.::.l.i.: ::•.',.•••::i.-:'iia./_L•.-::,::.:••••••,,,-..-••••::.,:::•,..,:f;::,...,:•-.;,:::-..:•i...:,;---=- .. . . i.:......i.,..••••::,.:::•.:i::',... (iiiii- i',..•:i.:•]:::'..:,•:•:.i,...,iiii::'•i ••. :•, •:,.t.77.7,.1.1.7-.7.7-,..7.7...-vs'F'.i;,:i,,,i7c.,,-,-,),i4-77.7 -At :! ..c.. .....7:..!.,.(1.•:::"7:•.(,,.',.:,:i '-:.::.'-:•'::'.-j.:.•••••:':..i'::::-...-',..:'•',;..-',•Ix.*••''"t'' .,:' ' :::::-::•::,.....i•-"i', :.:.f.''.:"..':'.?..ii::'.i':::::js.i:...::.f.:::::.:...,...,.....'.......!. 'ri.,........:::•:::::-::i.J...-;:i.:.::::: :::: :::::::;-.-;::1..._7::•...1.!r-7-f*-Frif:j..' . . .::-:ill ,,.•-", ...:.:::':.:-':•:.‘•,....";X- •I!1'7-7;'-..:7-../'...777.l- .:::,....:-:.::'..: f7"-:.- '''''''''': ;•''' '' . i:::,:m.:::::.:::: .. .,.:4:-,.:::::i::::::::.i.ii.'1..:::: -..,i‘i:'...,:-:;::•• .".;',.4. ,-,...i.:::::: ,l'E:::-..:','Mi ::. .''74-itiTt ....-';-" .• '77•:. ":::::,,....:,i',\'•, '...:'••••••••••••:::,••7" --.'••*::''''-'•:•••'‘.:77'''''''''....• '77-77:''77'.''.- :• :::'::;''i•:.•-• 'i..::::::-:i:i:i'i*i*:*:' ".•:-......::::::''':::::::::',.1 f.::':::::•.4::•:i::..••-•.........,..•7.c...-...-';.-c:':;;-.t.:!."--..'i•'....:.:;.:...'•'.••?: V.:.'..,',..',::::.,..........:.:::;"..,,'::: N. ,':•••••::::" ...`.''...,-.•,_ :'..-.'....::7',...-7.:?...i:,...::.:-...-...,:" -• '.)....:-...., .„. . ',. ;...':;,......:-.:';;;':: ..:•::::::.:•.::::,:'N:i::::?...,:.i:,..:•::/;.;+•..N.:,..,:,.5....-::.:. .:?,,,.,"..*.;:..n.,•.:i"':•.>::•,'•:,•:• :!'i-.v....t.;‘'-''''::5-'•''':.:,--:1:'•• --•,:,. .:•::i•:•:•.-•:......:....:`•:,::•:.i.:,.. •.‘:',...f.,./....._,•.•',. ,;.-1,....,..::.:.•:.:::::i:,...,.::..::.::: :,I : :, :.:. .. • .-- ''''':''''' ''''-''•'•'•• •'.'••'...;4:.;...,..',,t,.;•':',•,•••''•' ''..••.•.,..;'''' •'. .. ....4 e......X.fx;:..-.,t;.7,...z.,-,*.;.,,, - , ..77-77-77.21-7-.7..-1 ..--.....,,..-.e-'.',7.1:7-...;,--,..--1,' .-''.:-':•.•.:•!:-',,,:.'.::::';:; ''....,;'.....'..!:'.:/,:.'•:::.:•.':;•••- ,, .;...w::•:::•,::gi.,1.?....••::;i§ii:.•:',.....i '',..'.i.i,..it*it....7,L.,':'.0:0....,:;,......,,,., ;;;J:::.::•:.-',..;iii,f;-1‘..-L. .....:Dloir'.....„4.;,..1.y31 ..1' :::.•-r-:-...,:.,....:.:.:•.,'t.:...."'..,7:::;, .1:-..:'.V...-:.-.:'',>.:.;,.:'-..,;•-.::.:•..:.:::: ::•.-:_'.:,!;;'::::J..-:- .':,-:' "•:.);';'...::r• ':j,,..;•iZi...i3...ANVklill:%':1‘:b7arr),'6.. a ,:: -....:: .. :14...;i!....,!IP.7. ...,,,,,-.= !..;.!.,..,. .......;:.::;/ . ,..-.:.,,:., .:•,:::::::::._.: ..,.,: !;:iit.:?..1-7.,7:•;-.•;,:s.. ,: .•" ....;:',i,::::_:, .::::,.-,;:::.,..:, ;,.-.4:,:y,..:....7 •-; ...,::;:.;,.:47.-..:.;,.,,N -;,..i:z...,,,:.:•: .7;N:.:,. t:.,.4c.,. :4-.?..7:7.t...:.:::..7.t7,.....,,.;;;;;;:.t-,,.....,.:.:tr:...... .... . . ...........:.,....:. ..,ii:i.:„.....:;:,,.." ;...„ :?7,-7...7. :1H,.::-...:,:..-.;:::2:::::.z..:..,-,,)..:77,..... -1;. ...: ,...:.•:.,,...,::::,,, t, ... :?.. .. ::::; .1. i. ..4.:.;iiligi.4gii'..r,:%;: r'4.X.Aj':"....:':'':':'' '..:ii. ::...:1.U..: i''''''.I..:::::15ii:ti,1:.j!',IL.::' ':'j.:'Zl;'g:.:ii:-$2:.:.: ,....:......,',2*:'. : .' -:, .': .....i .,..,::,:4.1 ..,:;:i . . . ,::: ,...7;,.."...717.7;';:,. il'''.....::::i.'':::-: ": i':41; ::..:.. .t..'111:75.4]'. .. gs.t,1,,..'..41•. .... .i,.. :ihiNiiii,Ili , . :..i! E'.....:'.:.:::'?: : .: !7.: '' tit ,..i.,.i...o.;•;ir..i.t.',:i:.....:•o.i.:,. 1".!:t.:::.....4,4i.et..:::,::..::;:.:.!!,:f.: ,,,:i.,.•; t1. •!.: .7'..,::...'....'7.7.: . .. . : :-....:. ,;;E:•::. .. ;::::::;-.,,:;;f.;,;..;i . ....................... i. ,...,.::::,:ii::::::.i,...::i;:,. ::i.i::::;.1:;;V:g;...4::ii.iri:;iiiF..:0:14:..7'iv.•::::*.'iii*:::.::::::''',.:..... . T........ .r.. •:.::M;;.iM,i...M,:::•.i::::::.;..: :.', .•'..: .•:•:•• •••..:,::......J.,,,:.L2;: ::::4:.....::: .....-:; '..-....:::::::-...4.::.:.:...:::::::::',4:::-.:-...-.4:::•::.,... Li:.:::....._ 11':11:Mli't':•:.:•::..;;i1:...A'.,:l...!.:...i:':::::-:;..s....m.'gii.:: :.•,.f7•.it.i..??':•;:.i:',.........'',......:-.. ...:r.:.•-b,..migig....:.. ..,:i;f:.:•.:77:.:::;;;:•:•:.:]•• !.....:i.::ii..... .....:4-Ali%.;::.:-.::.i,:.;::a::: ;: .:,..,.:-":!:......-- t..::......„.NFI••::::.:7; ... .:::::,,.,:::,:••-..,:,::. .!•••: ... .':,.i......::..i.li$,':•....?4.i :::;:::i;:?•:01.:•.i.ligk.ii.:.!..ii:.:.:::::ft,........:i::: :.•-..,..„Z".:1:::::•il. ::,.*:i*. ••:.•:.:: :::•!;L : .. :::. •.:: ....:;....,:••,•.'•1•:•:,•:::... .:: ::,:,...,..:•.,-..... 1,I, ,. ::::::• ;•,....,;,:,::,:...::.;::::::.,;,/•.t.....1„.,.:,•,.:;;;,4::7-7.7.:: .:• INN :' :s., ..s -zoonN,A14.-.,:!'i6WO ::.-..gii., iafd540WV. .-.7.... .e.,..74::.g0:T.:.. :'-..:?._:c.'j ...i'd.rr.:11:11111::,-,.Sifilr:::':::!1::-'',,ki.i:1:?'.k..0''...:!::;iiiiit. iiiiiii. :...il. 1.filli.l.".11.1111.11.;'. .. ;1 . ::;..!"21:11:•:141r. i ..,7:;.::'::',.''..;1::!..ii!,..1.11:'!,•-i...1,1,•...1.:.,H:::.-,-...!.'.i,...:.:•;r.E! :-., il!:gr .....:.!.. ..'i'''''..:::::*; & ; ttil :5:... . -37.;!''..::::::::',1,,. ..-. --],-::.,-,-.'.:..z.....,iiimiiIii:::::,;:p..i.i..o. weil...;.:::.::vi:H;;!;:.::,.il.:...::;•.;;;.::•.;.;:..,.... ......._:....:.:.:.::•••:::::::::::,:,::,::i::::::,:::::::*i*,,....:;,..:7.,. 7,..........._:i-... .........::„...,... .. 1 •......,...........:.:,,:•:n>..:.:*K:W.%.; :•5''::::::'::1::'''''':::V.:.,:::,:.,..;:;...... :.:....::......:....;‘ ..,•.•.. ..:::::.:::,/,•::::::••.:-.'.: .. ",-••••',.•••••""''''''''',"' ''''‘....- - '.. i'.1"::" ....:'...Z.;"444::'';::?:::if4::::AR:t."....ilai!'%%:: :.•'''.i.').C..:i:::.i.f.ii:::::%:• •••:::.;•:;;;:;.:::;;;:.`•:::;::,,;,:::;:.%::':':::,''''':•:•. 1•:•::::'.?•.i••:-.-::.<'. :%*.*;iii.**:•.:.5.:: :.1:i!::::;',:;5:...:',•:,:,::;;•.;:,:,::::::;:.%,..:.::::•;.:.;;*1.,::1';',•••••••:..--'..--•••••'..'21....7:::::.- ::••E: '''.7:it.'.:i::J":".:".••tiiii,; ::':•,.:R.::..:4;Z;: . : :IN'ji;g.i?•"•ge ::1:::''''' ',.g.':''''''•'iRO.,..,•::!.....• : •••:'.:i•':.. *:;''''.....i:::::::-gi;"•:::•;:•::::'•:::::g::::. :::;41:.•:?.;;.i...r:::.•:? ';@":5'ni.":':':N:"gi.:: :: :::::,_-...:f • ...fr.,:•.,•:.:.,",.:-7.:..1..k,.::!,::;,••••$.:,•:*.,>.,..:.::..:•::,:ti*,:L,,,,,:.,::i*:.,...,•,:i*fa4.::,.,,.::-:.:•-•:,..:::;:ff.:'•..:::-.:.::•:::::.;,.. ••••:...*:::::::::::: ••••••• :; rt..• •40 • ..:.:::,:,.:: .:. ., , ..‘,,,:,r.:i*::::::::::::...:::::::'.....:::..i,!af.'„:::;::::::::::;:f::54.:*?.:*::',*if.,:',..:::......:..:.. i$:-...*:,:.:]:::::::,::',,..:i.:*.:,..:::: :::.: .'r .:''''''.•: :::::::-!' a.;:ii-i?-:::••:.:;4ii*.....:.''.*::;;;A;iiiii .iki:.'........... .....:i'.i. E".:k:?.::.$.0,.:•,1....,.....:.41"!!....7?:..%:i:::;;::• .a•,• "::,...s..;...,:.,%:.:,•?..:.'...:Cii':..f•;::::igs.M:.4;i.i.:.%..,:i.iii,..S,ii..'..... ::::.:. .:.,M :''''"'•,':''''''''' 5..S.:i".ii.,.S.::,55::: :;:;;;;E;;!*i;,..f,..*:,i,,....:...,.........:•.. .: . . ........ .......... ....... .... ... . .... .. ..........,... . '•'..."'''''''• ''''',•,,, n,'!•,,,,,.,•••••••% :"...f.i v.v.'''.,,s•.:5;i::::i:i".:::, ...:....%.:::...:::::,:::::.•...... :.,.... .. ........ .......... ..,.. .... .......... ""-•••••-•-•••••••-••............,..................„ .:..,--,,i;i•••,..•.,.. C.S*,:i::..,:,i:if.:: ........:.:.;....;:.:.:,..,.:;.......:.:.:.' :.:.....:.....;.%;.::..,...;;....,..:..::,..........::.,::::::,...:::..i.,'. 1 .'•-••••••••••-••••••••••••••••....,....................................,................................,.••••••••••••••••••••........ •• ........• ........•• ....- . . ...‘. .. .. .... ... .....'*:::::i.::::';':::,:•.:::::::::::::::':•,.:::::::::::.-..:-...,::::.:.:-:.:.:....:.::::,..:::,..:...::,..:::::,,,,,:-:•4 • .; .....‹.z...:;.:;•: .:,*::,....,,,,,i:,::::::',.:]::,:i,:ii*::.:ii:?;iii'iii!::.:::?.i:R :.:3:,...';:i:iii:i?..ii:i:if:::,ii,.............':i .,:.:ii:.:.i:::i,:..::.:..iiif..i.i'...4.;...ii.:::::::,..., :,%.,•,.....,',:::::',12::::::,5:i.t.:S.::::::,.:::::::::..,::::,*:..•,:?.?.:::.:zz:::;:-...::::::.ni::!:,:f::::•.::::::::.:*.i:f...*.i'.::::::::::::.*...:......:::.:::,..i: :,--.7-".,•,-" 7"...ii,,:,3.4.7:.,,,i,i':,:. .,::::::::•::..:.::::::::::::::::::....:.:::::.:,......:::::•;:.:,::::::::::::::;:::...:::,:..:,:f.,,:,:.....),.:.:::.:.......:>:-.: ::::: *;::.:,V1::;i'.:,..:....• .§. .ii.i.i,....:i:::..'%.'.:::::;iiiiii::.'•.f.gi::;i::Wi'lli''''''...:*iff''.:i''':14A.':'•:::. .0:.::;,,:::;:..............;i:s.;;;;:.;;-.;;;;;:;::•;:;':::::::::.;,,;'i.,'.V:..:iii,..,:,:::i.i:- ..-.....— ...i.:''.1. ... rc.l; ii. ::.i!III: i::...:ill.11 4i \lil ..... ,....... ....x.......:..:;:.:,,,::::::..••::::',.:,,e.•::,::::::::::c*:::::,..;:::,:, '::.*:.::.::::•....:::.,::::;,.f...f.A,*.4:,,:::::..%;:,...,,,,,,,.:..,,,1 .1.........„ .......4j,i:i•::::::',,:i:::::::..:::: :.:::,:...':,,,i,.:.,:::,•:••••:.,,,i%.,:::,,;::::::':•.,..:.;,..;::...i:;;:::,,.:;:;:yfoi:....S.?:.:,iii:.,..:iii::.V:i.i;1•g.:i:.i:i:M,'..,;,,.•:,iiiiiii,/1.i:....:::-.•,..., is. '''''''i:".:;i:iV;:::':'?•:' ii.g.,..4:i':::?5:;:!..:::'..:•:::.i.:::iN.%.i.it:';' °...?:ii,.tii•;.::lia?::.Ni tg::%1:::::.1%;•':r%,.',.•• ki;.i.ig..iii..gi.f...t.l'.:.1.‘;.t.7:7:::::•:• ... . ,.. :!',11:51.:.1!ili.:1:...:...:::.'7''.'•. .:'..i....... .::::.*:i..:.:i:i::.::::1H::‘.,:.:P::::F:.:.::i•:::i:::::i::::.:::::::...4::::::::i\.iii iiii•.:i-. i;,..4:.::i.ak::Z::.:gffl:.:it::i!Ev,,.„..:.,;.i.:.].:::i,,:g.:.•jMe..i..„...:.:..•:..N:.i4.i..,0..?0:11m.1..•:1g:i:i::...4:,..ig:':::, "•' _i.': . V I 1 Area . i,.-.-,..—.. .......--_..-.. .—1I .....-_..•.>c/` 'I I ........,...::.......,......::::::::::::::::::....:i:xic,f.::::::•,:: ,.. Z34 :i:::...::•:::.::: :::.....:•,:::::•:::::::,:::::.:.i.i.-..,:•.:••.•::::.•.::,... f-•;.*A r e a 1 1 —.....---i•-•—... ''''''''''''::;:':':::'"::•:•:...':::::::•:•:•:•:':•?.-.::::,.:: ›s I ••I . - i I Il':.::::,.:.......,..'.........;......:: :?.... ;.',:.,..._:..„.._ - -1 --- • : ..7.-.%;I-1 ;..... I. : I 1 1 I • I :.............1;...• ,.. ..........—, I: i :---- ." ......---i . .,1 Incorporated Areas N Roa..i LLL-•-•...2 . •-- .:---:::-1 Potential Anne xert ion A....'s.a ' . ....:....: Parcels d ---:-----'--' ' 0 O.5 • 1 1 .5 2 == 1993 Interim Urban Jo int P Ian n ir r,...........,, i ..4.-'.,•—•;:'^ tc.-'•Y.:.-..:-•,;,.;•.r.1----.;,_______ I N Growth Area line i. Ii MILES ...*......7 Proposed Urban Growth . . -• ...• . . v. 115 & 1 it. Renton Area 1 Recommendation The City of Renton and King County staff agree this Joint Planning Area should be designated urban. Facts • Approximately 78 acres. ■ Within the interim UGA, part of a Technical Review Area. • Designated urban by 1985 King County Comprehensive Plan. • Current zoning under Newcastle Community Plan is Suburban Residential (SR 15,000). • Outside of Local Service Area for sewers. • The City wants the area to be designated urban. • The area is semi-rural with some smaller lots and subdivisions, with some large tracts of vacant land. • Contributes surface water runoff to the May Valley. • Technical Review Area report recommended this area be designated rural mainly, due to public opposition to an urban designation. • The law firm Cairncross and Hemplemann, representing the Morrison property on the eastern portion of the area, prepared a report with justification for including the area within the final UGA. • The area is located within the Special Assessment District for the east Renton interceptor making the provision of sewer service to this area feasible within the 20 year timeframe. ■ The city believes inclusion of this area within the UGA would further protect the city's aquifer recharge area by providing sewers. Analysis Designation of this Joint Planning Area as urban is consistent with the Growth Management Act and the Countywide Planning Policies. This area is partially characterized by urban growth and is adjacent to area characterized b; urban growth . It is sufficiently free of environmental constraints, the city can efficiently provide urban services, it does not extend beyond natural boundaries and respects topographical features. 1i581 8 Area 2 Recommendation King County staff recommend this Joint Planning Area be designated rural. The City of Renton recommends this area be designated urban. No agreement has been reached at this time. Facts ▪ Approximately 80 acres. • Because of a mapping error, this area is partially within the interim UGA, designated part urban, part rural. The line was intended to be consistent with the Soos Creek Community Plan. • Designated rural in the 1985 King County Comprehensive Plan. • Current zoning under Soos Creek Community Plan is AR 5-P, one home per 5 acres, with development conditions for clearing and grading, street trees, significant tree retention, and street design. • Existing low-density development. • Within the floodplain. • The City wants this area to be designated urban. • The City wants to provide road improvements to the bridge that serves the plateau.- just northeast of this area which is designated urban. • King County already has road improvements scheduled in the next six years for safety only. • The area is not needed by the City to accommodate projected growth. Analysis Designation of this Joint Planning Area as rural is consistent with the Growth Management Act and the Countywide Planning Policies. The area is not characterized by urban growth, it is within the floodplain and thus not sufficiently free of environmental constraints. The City states they can provide urban services to this area within the next 20 years. However, this area in not needed to accommodate projected growth and there is no immediateor anticipated need to provide services to that area. The City of Renton wants this area to be within the UGA so they may provide road improvements to the bridge that serves the plateau just northeast of the Joint Planning Area which is designated urban. However, King County currently has road improvements scheduled in the next six years for safety. The area does not extend beyond natural boundaries. However, the City's proposal does extend into the floodplain and thus does not respect that topographical feature. 8 14581. Area 3 Recommendation King County staff and the City of Issaquah recommend this Joint Planning Area be designated urban. Facts ■ Approximately 80 acres. • Outside the interim UGA, designated rural. ■ Designated rural by the 1985 i ng County Comprehensive Plan. • Current zoning under the Soos Creek Community Plan is AR-5 one home per 5 acres, with development conditions for clearing and grading, street trees, significant tree retention, and street design. • The city wants this area to be designated urban to provide a squared-off boundary for service provision. • This area has very steep slopes and is within erosion and landslide hazard area. Analysis Designation of this Joint Planning Area as urban is generally consistent with the Growth -- Management Act and the Countywide Planning Policies. It is adjacent to areas characterized by urban growth. While it has steep slopes, extends beyond the natural boundary of the ridge and is environmentally constrained by the slopes, the city wants to include it mainly to eliminate irregular boundaries. The City does not intend to develop this area at urban densities or to provide urban services throughout. 9 4....... ..01. 1 5 8 1 • . Renton - East Urban Growth Area . •,....,, _.. .. I _ / •:.,...,.. ,..____.... .. _...,.,,tv..\ :...., - .:±1 .1_._, -".. \ . - 2‘ ..... • • „...... ,.... „,........,„,... „...., ... _...---....- _. i.-.;.•., ..........‘ . . .,_... .....,,.::,--,-7.7-,->r,,-w,-, >4. ..-.--: ..:•:,:-.7-"f'...,7....*.*.: -1----__.•:•,.., --... j \1 __, q.j.11,?:.:r;i i••-,-_—..1:::..H... .::::) 1.•.,:_:::.. Isl._... , • ' .' 7• .., 1.1:-....1.1"::'" ..'.'.----777•''Z'''>?X,.>' > ,,V›,>>.tir7.1:_74:71 •••••,---i... • .,- -•• ...-'r-.-.---1....1---7 - -.1•J.ft:•.p,•• >>,>''...-:::.:.:.-r....: .--- ••••• / • • . ....>••-, ., :•••••''':-L• ••••••:•-.:::::i•-p..... ‘,77.77-.77., > .> >>>>'"•:::::=1:....____............,___ i -....i___....- .../ '.;...---..r- •...------ ! 1. ; : i I.II:(•.-:: Ar e a 1 11,>> . x.,J•....... -1 '-*—F .-- — - ---.1.::%r I • .1 1- , .;-_,.!.:.r. ...f- • : ; • • •-•.•••••- ...-- •••••,..' ' ). •-:::::.:.L. . .....,r t- 1 I I 1 j •,_"—.......,•-,..r •4-.::••••:-.• 4,./,'N':".>...>>> > .>';.x.77-::::•••7 i .....7; - •••-.:*. .. ...... .: ,..._;.,.....:,...._ i____..: ) ! 1 t ::.:1 I, -- ,. • . ... . ,.., „„:„. ,.. I '7; : . • . .-,.i.1.:-.-:.:i..., i.L.-;.::;;:.:-:',,:'..t. .:1:"•,f -,.,?...?. :-.,› • • .-.::..,.... . . --,-,4-••:. ..._ _..._ .. . . . •....; J.... •1,!: :!•-••:,...:—.....-- , •.1 : : H., : : : : -,_.: .,•:, . ,-, ! 1.,_ i 71 . .:.2!-17. : ....A:...:i.,...i::i:],.i:...,...:,!.::...i.;,...,.,, ,,:-. ••Zr..77.--,••••[i '...-i•;••,-'--L..;-•-•%•- •'J.::-.1Zfl\1-.74•::4- j :l '.....- ,.:j ::',,,..,7...1.:•',...!... .,i,... :.:,, ',:,...','..l:',...,,:.:',,:.::::"':•:i'::":.-i•••'•':!'1.11' .4-7:i J.:::ii '.i Ff,', .''':'1.•• j ___;•:.••••..z I I t_.....1 • '-: -.i 1 1 I---.. • ----•. ......,.•-‘;i•-•••' • .,1'.:.:,,,.,.''.:,..1,:.,,,,;:,••••1,:.; 7.1..=. . - :.i..4.;; ..•••••••f-r•-;.;•••':'1:•.:.:7.-.- -:•-4 i J... • i f•4 I j / . , I — ...•- . . . -.... ...•• .• . •••• • -.. :: I.i. .1 ..:21-••••-i- : 'i:'....:1 7 1..:::''''iii ':-'-:-1:'..'41:;:;.J.....;:... ..':':...:.....-.' '.:i.l..k.: 7-.2==.:7--...7.-Lutl.:14.:.:. ''.7"'.:.•• . --...It.ra,...0•*, „ ci...-...-.4.... . : :::. j:,:'..*:,:...,.:....:'.,:„ILL.717.:,,i;.:7..,7.7.,i.r.",•717.?.2_:Ls,..il..:1 i.:L.., ..-::: i PF-:: ' .*:".4.•••''...7..::!.. ..; :::•i'.ii'ii:iii,i ..:...i.. .... ....A.44:.r,i=4.47,......':1 ••Ly"-40.1.IC ,......... ! :::.....11:41Eit"ta".:.1. , _.,,.....-:..................... il;j:, 777...:..:,,,, .a.„__...;• : ..r1;..:r,..4%.-,... .i.,?.....,..:..,Z,:1-.“.,:•.::: el-N '. .',-,. '.,'.:':...:..:.',i r"•ii'.I'.': •J".,,• i,,Z;1i.11 i i L.. ••••:,.•.i I''.:.::•.7.-.'"-"........a•.‘.;...:..•.:.:7."-,41' rpf••'•1-•,'':::,..:.',. .: - •••••••;::•;;;• ,-,-4••.::',,,'•:•:.I.•::-..:.::,:,:::::.4 ,!.::''i;:•4.1-d-*:.-=..,:TI',"!:n,..•••:',2.•:•tr".•,','r:''''•7 1.4., '''''.-''”" : :, •••;....:•,.--. ;....T.--::.:.,.':::.:1-7.:.;:-__,:: :1 _,..„,J.....,r,..--7.-...k.a, ',•-•'r•-•"•:•-•:-.::.:::::: ,.:,..,....:.....,;;,,:•;•:•..•; ,:;:.......:;:?:i.:::-.:.:;:.;:•::;ii;::-i.ii.,:.::::.;:::,.:::ii .:.;:; :i:..,: •••••••:. •i:::::;:;:•:.;...:-....;•,- ......- ;,...:11,-.., ,.....1;7'.1..,... ir-•-.1,..-::,:- .1',iiii-::•;:::-.7.:!--...,,.,;;... t--,..tt.:!:,:-..--:•-•;-,-..,•=;•,-..,-7.•:=7,-;•::f.1•:.-,:,....7\a2.....,,: •%,''., 'r!ri*:;•:•:.'-:. . . .... . ..."" •••-i• } . 1 . ,1 . . _...- • . • r •-• - •!,::*:':•.,7,-.7?..:7.....-....:..,,...::,,:.:::.:.::,:::::::::-..,,:.::,:::::::;,::::::::::-•:::.:.:::.,•..—:›•...••-. ...,...... . . .......,•.. ..•:,,,•••••1.!:. :::77..,:..... ...,,,...::,:•,!, ---;;,,,T,',..:„.... ks.:•;:•-••;----....: _,:_- ...__:" .-.....L... r_.....L.,_:•t":",..::,,,,••••:•:•.:. •:.:.,--••••,••• •;.,.i.sff;',,I..:;:.:::::.-...1_,:::,,,,,,;;.... .......,..;.‹ ..;1,..,...... ..,.::::__:_±:7„r: -,s••19..,,.!..:-.7.V>:...'.:, ,,,,.r.:,-..7.-•!,----->",-!• --•-••••--77;.....:.;. ,„...:.......„.., .-..,;:''-.-.7.'..r:-.7:77.77:7:•:•:,:,:;;.,.:,,...•{:::•::•.:i,•:•••,:•:':,••,:•'*•:,•,::: . •::: . ••..;;;..--.,•,:•..,,:',::.:',:,i.:::h...:::',..,;•:,••.,',...::•'.,ii, ;i.:'...4'.:,••••••••,'.::',.'"...:::.1''' ' ' ' .. ,...-....f•-•.,..,... .....;...1-.,•::.......-••'"."--':,-. ' -•'-'•-• .,-..z..i........ :::::•'::•::",::::.:."::::::::.:,:..".::::'':'•.•'..:':f:':•':.,.......:.::.:.i.:....:::..x.:•:•:: • .....:. ,..,..:•::::.',::::'..:.::::-.....::'::••;.i,::,'.::'•.•.--•••.';':':•::. • 7, .,,.:::;...::.."..:::1,,',.• ::.,..:..:.;::: '7. ..;-•••4'..••----- 7", •.•• 1.. . ........ .. ... ....... ..... — ,. ., , Z.L;.if.i.:..1:::••••": k7•• •::::i•:,:•:•. :•''''':::':•••,'••:•;•:,.:•'L"::.,i:''...„1.'•:•*?ZtZ•.'-..,:::•••••;.1.: •,•L•-•:...- , 11••.;7•1W.:4:•....4...4;.,..'7,7:::••••••--•-••""•••••••" • -•- •--- - ' ' . --- •.;';'717.1.1;;I.:.'r'•::•••••:::::::•••:•;--,..."14:;•:•+11'.1 F;J: 11.1.14+! ...4::':'•:: Jiti4j17.j.-,7.:.,ttfITUL:•-ff-••?...:.:•i:.'••: ::::::::,:.:.,:.:::,.,:::ijr.:t...........,..,71:.:::,....,:„:„..:,..........:••••.,::.,.,- ......... *.,........_..1 .:,_ ______=,--17.,_'.': ,'•••••••••V:: ::'.F,'7'•;;-"Fr......:\•"• i.1-:-.*-.:X741';'•?, .!tri•'::ii:.,:7:::;.:= '•';pl:::;,. ...::::::.,..,..,:•i::::::••:•:.i.i::::,....,..::'......:::-•:.•;':','.....:::171-.,.t...i::.7.77,-:,-.'...:::-:•.'' '.;.''..,.. .'7,-;_:',LL.....',..,--7:::......"--4 ::':'•••'••• '• '''''''..--''''';'•''''''"'114,':1-1.r:::4-'•":::.'•:iiTa!Lr7777, 't•A I "'..,.a.'•";;;.::.•'''" :',",'''..•"''''""7"t"..r:'.'%.:::f.!..71::::::17.11:::-:'...:.-:1 f;:-...r 1 :1 7.•;; ',..___.____I ,.;___I•,•,..•.:1-4 . . ,-...1., ,•yf"';'.".".,.:..4....J4..... ..T..r:.. ''.. ...;••••••\:.•'.• :. ::.':i..::::..7".7.: •.....::.:.:s''i'•./.."'.':.'.".'...'.".'i'...:;.1." ::::'...:i::.:i::::'':.':::''''',:i::::::..::,"..i..'':',.....r..•I•,-.., ,.. ..i!.;:i.:iiii i.. ..:••••• ••••,..::.•••••':.,:. j:tif2...;;;t7tr. .... . f 7**1,.4 1.1:1 ;;'..:1:.:•:.-1;7.4..••'4•"'....:((7.7,i l'f'':'::::....' , ..r.',.V7.:77.7.77,W:.:.::':.1:;::::.:il?:'.i.: :':1:7.f1a.1:7..;...t.• .•.(i.ii iii i•i..i i•;:;.;:.,... • - ..-. ._____•.___________. ;•:.,....-,:•-•- ...r. L::-.-...,—•••-•;•;-:•,--_: .1:...{.,i... -,•:',.•.:::.'.•......... ,••,..t.i::::,N..)...1 ,•:::•:•••,'.:•::i:1 l':-.''''.....i...:;.;'':'3,'','••:.•;;'.t....,i .,' -'--,•:.1:-7:-7r*::'. . -rt.4:•...r.:',74..,..,=;;". -.... :._:....',. ..:.,1•.::', f.-•-1---7"--•-.2: :_:,=c,..•1:•.1.,:-..,:::—.-4..,.;.•..:..... p4,-i...::.r7.•••••• :-,7•••,--77-7,-4.,;:q,e,.•.,...:;r.:::::::,—,--,..,....,._.--..;::......:,.., ,.,...-.....•::::: ::A _;:.,,.,,, ... ..i.„•___;._, ,;:r,.:.:-.""772,-,:';,....4,,......,1_____-,- ...:%.,,,,___••-.•-"• •••••''...1 .,,;.:.,2.in --",, •'":Y:yr/.'...I.sc i.,•-..-•:...ir,•.i...--,._.-.1.i.i-- ,..------..--;:7••. -,-,:::(.::::: .:;.,•.:,‘.---,--:',>„,;:_.„. .„.........! ......T '''''':::::''77 r.:..-.!•,---,1",......:......,-,-- ---)., ,.':'.i. ....r.-; ... .i..-.,...f,-;,i!,:.-...,77.-_,7-i: ,.:::.:•:•:.;......--4-.77.--••••:;:-,i,:,;.1..^,.--:."...:-•.,i'11 i-;i! LLI :;•-,...;:,4,..,-.%•.,.,....:,....f.7. -...:.f... ••••-iti-.777,.:::".:44-77L'•;:-.TF--...::::.!‘::'7---::?:-•-;'•LI •:.L.i••'::1;',8,•1-:•..,...,:':' :. ":----f-T-Ft:•,i'!."5,1:::';:.•...--:. -7.•,::::-.771'.... :-.-Iii.::.;::',-.t,.-..'..': '' .• ,....?;;;>?:';7.?‘.'y_;;;;''N!:.-.:..."::, .. r I::.1,; .:,%.3,43 ,:i1],,i,.4,1 :..if,i,-,4:.",.:'.. ..,,.;•,•;;;;'......:::::..N.:',:...,,.',:l.i,... ......j,-..7'.',......::..;:..,,,,'.ii.1.1-.--', ':':"-.--!,,i7.':•••.-....::::::: :::•:•,....,...•,:-.•...,•,::,•::::,.•••.:,:',:::::: i :.:',..-..i../1;,..?,'..17.7,:.;•.1›.., :-..'1.`••• ....•' I r:'.>."-\/-*P:..-.--ri.:.i.ii::-.:•:.•::-..1:: i.izi,iii:::it'.',"!:....4:,,,-.'z:i:i.::.'.,::iii:ivi:-::::::'.r.;:,::.;:i:. -,i:'...,*•,-..7-••,.i::::::-.1-i,',L=•:•;•:-.7-,,....1---....r.,..-:..':':.,'',',:','..',':'h s'..i::.:7: ,.:......... ::,....,...-': . Z.i........,:.,,,,,:.,;:.7/71 ," , :"••;,:•!I''"i'-""i'-'7i'.'iLt...:,-,.... .7:7.=.....i:]:::i....i....•--• ,:,:iLi.:::,:F:::•,,::.'.•:::;-;77i',-zt... -,...).:':.-.-.;.:•• .r.7.....,...i.• 4 ,...,.„„;,:„,,.:,,,,...„:;:::,:„,,,,,...,...„..,,,,„.„.::::::,.. „,,_„,,,,...„.„.....„,_,,Tr:,,,„ ....::_. ....,.„..,..,::..:.:,..,................:::::„,:.:..:.::.,:.:„,.E.:/...„,...„,,,...„.....„..,(7_,..„..t,:„i ,,,„ : ...... ..T.r.,,,,,,,:::,.:,,.,...,..,.7.,„.......,..... : ,...::;..,..,,:....-37..j.:'..:::...i.:-.:•]':,;;, ••.' ...i'..4 •."1.i;,...;ii•1;....•• _.......... K'':':,...::•::::•......,,,......,„........7....i:S:::.*i': ..........,4:?' '. ....:':':::'''''':'''''''"''''''..;';'," *ill's ini.i'N'Ili,:-;;i,;...•.L.':,••:;!.....:.T:%...:,:".:,.;%..:.t;:•••::..r:•'l'iL.1 'II/.17.7;•:..f ':',.'e"";.T ....4‘L--7f'...,7: • : ,.. '>,>,) • - .4".;:,:`.+7.‘$.:...i.'." .*.,...,:i.i.;...-;‹,,,,,,:.%.!...,;:•i',..s.,:„-,...,..:,..e,......: ..•-•...7 i 1 i ,,._ . ..., V,*•,.:,,::.:igi.i:ikii.::„..1.::,,,a:::::r•IA•iici:':',:, . ...),,,7*:-..,:‘,..::,,,:, .,,,);,),,, ........ :.,:•rii!;,.....:•..,,,,.,,,.:;•=i.„:.:,i,,,...,.;.,../.1.c,,t:,i t•;,4,,,,-;,'r,..',..:!;:.• k ..!"..,_,! j ,,_v" ...i.v.`14 ic.•co:.•,?•.:•-••,,.4.4, 4;4**.6.4 .'',...ININ•,( ..., '..--. ..... V..1':'.:.iii:':'...?;'::*::ii.:;Wi'.:‘:.*,'.:::,i:.i:,.:,:*4•••,:> ,..„„ 1,.,if.:.%.,i'..?:::.:%••.:::::.:. :...:•:;::tti,,:::?:"::,ji.',.:,. ... .1. .e).• I ta,It iii;.• i ......ri•:,-:-.--',7;:<,,,:‘, ''''''''::: I f'...., :•'•:••••:'1'••0•:.:.'•ii:i••.:•:•:q:•::'::,?:•:•,1 •••••...j....:..;: ,S „). .,.,...-.) ''''' ,;>•,>>:-...,,.''.) :,,,,,:, :.'•i•M:,': ,,ii.:i:,i::, :.::,:. i.:',.• •-• Area 2 ''''''.."'' •••,>._:,•-r.:7•-:.---1-1-.-;i—• :. . ? : !:•,•:!!i;;!!!;,... _--,,,.,..../,. --. • — I :.I..---t-. ;,:_•••',...4?:,•••,•:. • ::::::; -, :i•,, •-• • 1 7-", 1 ; \....r - • 1 ,,p,,.'•ii::!•:;!. ;5' .: 1.....:::....M..',..,.•::,.,,,.:7-.._-'7. -i:::::;.: ' 1 -....s.:•:.,\•.. : 1 --..-7 ;--.." % ••.----\\.1. i :fi :::':;::/- 1 .. ::-.-,F.:;.-- lij;-?, ,'. •:;\ ,.. ..7„....:...:.:.::::',E-,:::1,::::.,:.?,...*:.:::...-....:.::.:..:,...::;.. - -•-•--•-•-___ 'i•itit..—:,,,,'. - -.::„ -77-1 ..... , :,....:::::.:, -,.•.-::,....i.i.',i:ini:.:::.:',...::::.*:.:-4:::...i,i:.:A.:::::.:::... ' ',•.!.,,r ..A.A • , ....... ... ..... ........... .. ...... ... . ... .. ..... .... . ..... .... . ..... . • .• . . .. . .. ...... ........ ..„ , ........ .. ... .. ... ... . .... ... . . .. .... . ........... ............. ... ... .... , --. • • . ... 1Vr' -.a.-.-:i 476----:.•:.'71:7:-IV'-a.:\211e • .------R , , , .,::„,,:,...:....,:„,:,:...„....,.. „.,,,,,:::„,:,,,,,...„...„,.....,„ _. ,-",.-„„„.,,,,,.„...,,,... ,,i,,,,::„:„.„,„:,.„-.),,..-__,,,i,..:::-.-..,::_;,, . ....,,,...., „....... • ,...:-.....„.;:.:„:„,,,.,,:,,,„,:,::„,„•,. „,.„,....,,,„„:„,,,,,,,,v,::_-_,,,,,,..-. . : _ ..... _.. . -r. .... ''' ..:.` '' R 1 6 • f• l..... rl•.... [.....j '':. .•;•1'`.4.••:.;\.;:."•••• *".•••••'•.,•-••1•-:::,.:::',''''..i.•.:.'•••:!: ,,,,, S>") . ..L,' att.':••-•.e..,•!!•••..0.^,,>•) •• \' . >' >>>,,>>,,, I 1 i L....._; • 1 .....„.... 11.!.,...,7....'4• ',:.-:::;i'....":::::.-,": ‘'S . ..N.X.).X•I\>Vr?).?'• ,X.•>, :••,-.. ,>x>,.>, :,........ _.„.........- _ ..- .•, : ''"' . ... ..:.,:::..:.i.,..::::-.' .:::::•:,...:,'''::..M I::::::.....r'.:'.'..:.,,',•,''.. •:*!''''...4 I.;!':'...;•.;-:-........7C:-. .::.:;:.:....•::::- '.'. Area 3 '-'H.-----::•,Z•,.......:,•-••,':•••••:,i•-•..-:.,•:-.:::,- :-Ir;:ii...•:•,). .i :. ;..;-,--.-•••.-r.•?•3.-.1:!•;• .7._;'..:........-11.r.'••••!.;. ,'.::•.;;;;•.17.W.1J.liii.Trj:,,T:77:1-i.....; .:77:::..,:,._:_.:....,....... ...L....,,..„,;.:s. ... ........:. . ., --------.. : ;.:-.71•1;:••••••••:•.i...,- :•,2-4.1::.i.:::::;:::::.1.•,!.,i,,f•-•:::: ....,.:....::,. : :-..:::::i:...:.. ::.:T.:7-...".-7---:.::::::7-":"--4:-7-::::i2.72.••••--;•:. • •i.••i-,::r l•. *. ti..%);-,:c.t:•::(;:;-•.;.2.7.2,.....zi L.:;]1,,i.:....::....-i:!,i•:::::.:::::.,:i.,,r..i...- ...; :LI...H.:.i.....;7.7.7.......................::,..... .1:."i'''.''''''''''..::::::1::,::...'".... ..-:'.'.':i!L:• '/.-..7.7'1;. ''.4'. .,,,3. ,g:,..:::?;:;::.:ii...-4.'j*:"':';':::::.:':::: ::1 H.'.*.:..]1-:'''''':'!::::: .i:::'H '..ir‘r.'....> ':. :;>"•C.<'\:..11 .-........,... . ‘."'?‘ '\..,.N7..:...:'..41...11:1-'.....:77...7'i..:•::.::.:;;:-:;:•;-::•-::-...:,-.;:•::'.-,•:,-;;-,:-.,-,-75:.,;-......,,,;. .,%?,.... 1. -7,--:ii ; ••••.„..., .; .,";:-;,./.`..<5....:',•:,:.,_•••••••,...`;:l...;....!...•:::::::.i,,r::::777:,:::::.;.--'...r.',.,,,......,:....-.•; ./. - .a-/.C.:.N-....--• N Ro&d. Incorporated A!&OS L • •. .,....,.) Parz.-els . . Potential Annexelion 1-,'/Na )77;0 0 O.5 1 . .._1.5 N Joint Planr. 1093 Interim Urban i.-.). >,L....t..... • G MILES •":. •. .- prroo:ot:dArt_ie. alinne G ro,.,,:h . ' ,- • • '. • . . ., .. . . am ill ,,>,.' namensiMillirnillfi ,.. . . , Ill _ 1■�� N - p`k 4 Z Q ,.� ' wli® IIIIIIIIIIIIIt 11::- mil,-.:2::-11.•_:-' —72....r..4....1, .4‘/12 Biiii a 1/14 4,,r, gdosman 4. sk0 - 1 g=2.11, ••,..,. i , Il 111 ........ ..„......._ . __,... ,..„......._..._ ....r.. . ... „,,,, ,, ::.,...., ,...t, . .....= ..„,, ,,,.. . _ 11 m..,..1, ---,,..-_,:= ..,„,,,.- .,,,,: 111t . ----Il�lr 11111.11:,-,.... • . ,---„, . r ...... ..,,: „., ,..,. ; Ids mil A_ .� . 1 , 10 nlu •%pin 1 C""wliljii��18aC� fi. '� :®, „� " 11 rr., ;mow. ■ntur�1 �`�. C� sew . Ili' i. ,,,„. . , . , ,=6,4= i1a k..:2`I.- 11....iiimrilu mil .-.. ■�I11'1 1=;:= "�€�111411 ' _ 11-;°-'1-M:=I4E;M=iImmm11i-m=mew2=om-.1-, " iit..t 1 �" .i full ■J. . 7®3s, o +� 1. ,'ia'z1=,.1.111.,1— =F.1 .44..1-.I.I.I-.=1‘I.M.,Ii•N1Il1'lM==IIM-M-.I,I �s■�.1m.. — i. mai ... .; ,I11111111111111111==-- !till �..11:( —,411.11111V19 r►t ■� q '1111111i■UIIiiiii ■s" ": ,, it 11 ►VA ■—�.ii111111iiG�■' Ili : �■ _ �_ __ em �T]� ■ 1f1� i111e-1 � i1■��mI11111 IIIIII:■�■■■_r � im11=�>>� .11•INIVE6!• �kf 11 4,..1111►\w11111/ �■r■ ►1 Ile®_ =Intl. 1 1 II 1111= _ ■rr"1■uIR ■ 'a■111�w ■■ .��L\IIIG;\IIIIIIC 'uil'.i\� i 311�1ia'�, �_l:fir® 1`i1NI Irlw rrrlll■Itl"■■-.._,..... ,M .� �w■�,:,Z.c_ wwtl= Ev11.11.■IL1/l■111■ ■�y�lra .�wrwwrnl►� �■■ ■IIII.._ /yY_i♦. .. a tell I►\=:\'/�//II■111am _�■ii.—..- :�!-mn ■■■■ m (Ii112 Bin\=-IG"C►�ir�1■,1ir:1•. M . I1 1111I E� . . .® _. 1{i.:+it;-BE■ 11►►\ rile■ ! ,. ILI 1.=-1'illl,ll"II1..... -■■I =MI Mil mum IMMIM MUM IIN . = %� _ca.. ,�- .■/1_■.IIr11r1G=lila,'■91 j....�. _ Iim•mon MI •.'1mummum Wi�r.■.=■ ■ - .II�®. Irl-z iirli!Cir=�GD..�lnlnli ►\`1 ■III011llll■■11t1I • Uha,uti. 111.._RI 1n".,....0�,��7„' ��� w 3y'''"< .*. ,� �® Illldm- .�� -=1111 �I►1/r �tnl�I���iI/■��n. =11 Il1i.�_ i .. <'s ��■ �11111 .any ►'I i��m■ .:.. 71 it ��1 ►�`�\7�� r//ili1 :ii�lii(►� . ► =„th-N�aiml`"------- ■.i `��p�tN,��j \ ° ` f 1 _ _ _ J t �`1►n 1rna=-_aa__a �_ �►�►����, �Db��s lam.:xt:. .�► +.vir��c4.' ,4■raaueiiiiiiiii V=SSe� 0� i ��` � qt ..-7,,.1:-...,.1;---_-- .T.-...-- *.... ft.---;:zr=44 .441:301:1722_2'14,"„raii*".%*fliAtqirdw,,,,:.'''.a. I p���`� � a� .��,`�l� �\♦ �� 7$17.1➢�11� �..,. /1�3 .I�g� ,7�®� , .*s!�, `3� t�4�/. '� T c r`rZ' d 97 alit ...iikNo40: iiii_.--\\ ri....y.,,t,,,,.,,... ...„,,,...,„...,„,..„......„, ,, . - it•Ia�nm��7D .., --"'�� ." ....'„,,,,,,, . 1 ..... .0 CAI __ -il►A•.1h 'r.o `k ,t rAI x1 .t,lt, I n0..V.,°n ll IIW��'��,1:�� ',tt' t r• � `Yg. - 1 .x 3.2 t�t1 114ATI111.�,� s >t�� .> N'd t� y ^x°c s 4 t a j ff, c `''gyp t 1X 2 's 1t1� \� ii, ,, t 1 7,7$1. <� -w. -Alt' >s, f v r i� �IIIlnllullluu/ MI--i�ti11ll <r rY'zn . rani ,4 5 §, xeY .t ':,.i.'�;IPA = \ �� 5 • •,• ,• p+ksy r. �# xc Fw• .ova L ,i .eltlrw.rlll 411, 4.47. . Ij: .■��� i y.:�►1�a�♦Igp . 1..c�r s j < x 1,14 b"s � ;4a X x 1 .?I.�iii, , ,`r. it ` \���I/1�I ri. �����\11■n -::' �� t,, p"s 9n kf..t^ey >,. '.;a r `x I I URBAN GROWTH AREA MI OPEN SPACE *- Unincorporated Activity Centers 1 f Joint Planning Renton — East Incorporated Cities - - Area -', Municipal Watersheds Urban Growth Area ° Urban �° � Mudho CPP 'Framework UGA and El, Resedrvatiesonot Exec. Proposed Final UGA Water Bodies Executive Proposed UGA for Joint Planning Ares I Parcels RURAL AREA OQ Rural Towns VII Forest Production Districts 0 0.5 1 1.5 g. Agricultural Production Districts ernmsom loommeme King County PCDD 1994 MILESi 1581 11581 .4 North Bend Recommendation King County staff recommend this Joint Planning Area be designated urban. The City of North Bend recommends this area be designated rural. No agreement has been reached at this time. Facts ■ Approximately 480 acres ■ Outside interim UGA, designated rural. ■ Designated rural by the 1985 King County Comprehensive Plan. ■ The area is the developed subdivisions of Cedar Village and River Bend south of I- 90 and east of Cedar Falls Road. • The City does not want this area to be within their UGA due to expected costs of providing services and infrastructure. • This area may need a higher level of service provided in the future. • This area is an existing urbanized area and has little potential to accommodate new growth. • At public meetings conducted in the spring, citizens of this area indicated that they do not want to be within the UGA. Analysis Designation of this Joint Planning Area as urban is consistent with the Growth Management Act and the Countywide Planning Policies. The area is already characterized by urban development. Because the Growth Management Act and Countywide Planning Policies both call for urban areas to be within cities, it is appropriate for the City to provide local urban services to these urban subdivisions due to their current urban nature. Within the Urban Growth Areas, transfer of local service provision is expected to occur over the next 20 years, and may not occur at all within the next decade. Staff believes that agreements could be reached during this time to address fiscal concerns raised by the City. The subdivisions of Cedar Village and River Bend are contiguous to the east end of the interim Urban Growth Area. Staff recommends that the City and King County discuss the option of shared financing of infrastructure and service needs for areas that were developed under County jurisdiction and are recommended to be included within the City's Urban Growth Area. The River Bend subdivision is south of the river, and therefore its inclusion in the Urban Growth Area does not respect the river as a natural boundary. However, it is characterized by urban development. Provision of urban services is not expected to be impeded by natural boundaries. io November 21, 1994 Renton City Council Minuteso/ Page 484 BY NELSON, COUNCIL CONCUR IN THE COMMITTEE REPORT. CARRIED. (See later this page for resolution.) Streets: Arterial Street Transportation (Aviation) Committee Chair Edwards presented a report Classifications, WSDOT recommending that the referral relating to review of arterial street classifications be reported out of Committee with no further action required by the Committee or Council on this matter. This item was being held in Committee so that the City could respond quickly if any disagreements arose during a state-wide review process of arterial street classifications that was being performed by the Washington State Department of Transportation (WSDOT) as required under the federal Intermodal Surface Transportation Efficiency Act (ISTEA). The Transportation Systems Division reports that the City's recommendations for arterial classifications have been adopted by WSDOT and included in the federal aid system. MOVED BY EDWARDS, SECONDED BY SCHLITZER, COUNCIL CONCUR IN THE COMMITTEE REPORT. CARRIED. CAG: 94-, Shuttle Study Transportation (Aviation) Committee Chair Edwards presented a report Consultant, Parsons recommending that Council authorize the Mayor and City Clerk to sign a Brinckerhoff et al contract with Parsons Brinckerhoff Quade & Douglas to complete a study that identifies alternatives and an action plan for implementing a transit shuttle within the City of Renton. Most of the funding for this project comes from an agreement with WSDOT to provide $80,000 in federal funds. The City will provide $20,000 in matching funds from TIP project #9, the Intracity Intermodal Transit Program. MOVED BY EDWARDS, SECONDED BY NELSON, COUNCIL CONCUR IN THE COMMITTEE REPORT. CARRIED. Finance Committee Finance Committee Member Schlitzer presented a report recommending Finance: Limited Term approval of $980,000 in Limited General Obligation Debt to purchase General Obligation Bonds equipment approved in the 1994 budget and anticipated in the 1995 budget. MOVED BY EDWARDS, SECONDED BY SCHLITZER, COUNCIL CONCUR IN THE COMMITTEE REPORT. CARRIED. (See page 485 for ordinance.) ORDINANCES AND RESOLUTIONS The following resolutions were presented for reading and adoption: Resolution #3094 A resolution was read ratifying the Phase II amendments to the County-wide King County: County- Planning Policies adopted by King County on July 19, 1994, pursuant to the wide Planning Policies Growth Management Act, RCW 36.70A.210. MOVED BY EDWARDS, SECONDED BY NELSON, COUNCIL ADOPT THE RESOLUTION AS . PRESENTED. CARRIED. Resolution #3095 A resolution was read segregating assessments regarding LID #329 located in LID: 329, Parcel Nos. 1&2 the vicinity of S. 43rd Street, Talbot Road South to SR-167. MOVED BY Segregation (Valley STREDICKE, SECONDED BY EDWARDS, COUNCIL ADOPT THE Medical Center) RESOLUTION AS PRESENTED. CARRIED. • Resolution #3096 A resolution was read authorizing the Mayor and City Clerk to enter into an Metro: HOV Funding for interlocal agreement with the Department of Metropolitan Services of King Boeing TIP Goals County (METRO) for funding reimbursement for mitigation fee credits for Boeing. MOVED BY EDWARDS, SECONDED BY SCHLITZER, COUNCIL ADOPT THE RESOLUTION AS PRESENTED. CARRIED. 11/22/94 TUE 17:40 FAX 206 235 2513 RENTON-FINANCE I j0O1 ********************* rrr► *** TX REPORT *** Noe ********************* TRANSMISSION OK TX/RX NO 0157 CONNECTION TEL 92960194 SUBADDRESS CONNECTION ID K C EXEC OFFICE ST. TIME 11/22 17:38 USAGE T 01'53 PGS. 6 RESULT OK The City of Renton 200 Mill Avenue South Renton, Washington 98055 Phone: 235-2501 Fax: 235-2513 FAX TRANSMITTAL Date: November 22, 1994 To: King County Executive Gary Locke From: Marilyn Petersen, City Clerk Subject: County-wide Planning Policies Number of pages excluding cover sheet: 5 •% .` CITF RENTON City Clerk Earl Clymer, Mayor Marilyn J.Petersen November 22, 1994 The Honorable Gary Locke King County Executive King County Courthouse 516 Third Avenue, Room 400 Seattle, WA 98104 Re: County-Wide Planning Policies Dear Mr. Locke: The Renton City Council ratified the King County County-wide policies at the regular Council meeting of November 7, 1994. This information was conveyed by letter on November 15, 1994, to King County Council Chairman Kent Pullen. On November 21, 1994, the Council adopted Resolution No. 3094 which formalized its previous action. A copy of the resolution is enclosed. If you have any questions or require further information, please contact me at 235-2502. Sincerely, ()-i) Marilyn J. e sen City Clerk cc: Mayor Earl Clymer Council President Richard Stredicke Michael Kattermann, Planning Director 200 Mill Avenue.South - Renton, Washington 98055 - (206)235-2501 `$ ' '`T . •. r° CIT F RENTON .,.. City Clerk Earl Clymer, Mayor Marilyn J.Petersen November 15, 1994 Honorable Kent Pullen, Chair King County Council Room 403, King County Courthouse 516 Third Avenue Seattle, WA 98104 Re: County-Wide Planning Policies Dear Chairman Pullen: At the regular Council meeting of November 7, 1994, the Renton City Council ratified the King County County-wide Planning Policies with the following provisions: 1. The City of Renton continues to support locally-determined growth targets and continues to work with King County to refine methodologies used to establish jurisdictional growth targets. 2. The City of Renton strongly supports inclusion of the Jones Road Joint Planning Area within the Urban Growth Boundary. 3. The City of Renton requests representation on the Regional Finance Forum. The City Council also recommended that Renton continue its ongoing efforts to implement the County-wide Planning Policies and the Comprehensive Plan. A resolution formally ratifying the policies will be adopted by the Council on November 21, 1994. A copy will be faxed to you on November 22, 1994. If I can provide additional information or assistance, please feel free to call. Sincerely, -... AIIP / 4 C V'))--) Marilyn '&rsen City Clerk cc: Mayor Earl Clymer Council President Richard Stredicke Michael Kattermann 200 Mill Avenue South - Renton, Washington 98055 - (206)235-2501 • • CITY OF RENTON PLANNING/BUILDING/PUBLIC WORKS MEMORANDUM DATE: November 14, 1994 To: Richard Stredicke, Council President City Council Members VIA: Mayor Clymer je.0 FROM: Gregg Zimmerman STAFF CONTACT: Bob Kaplan, x 6215 , SUBJECT: KING COUNTY COUNCIL RTA CONSULTANTS Bob Kaplan of our Transportation Planning staff recently spoke to David Hopkins of King County Council staff who informed him that the County Council is in the process of hiring a consultant team to help them review the RTA System Plan and Phase One Proposal. There were six key elements in the Request For Proposal issued for this consultant team. These elements are to be the basis of the scope of work in the consultant contract (which has not yet been completed). The elements are: 1. Provide a detailed review of: the extent and type of service the RTA Plan proposes; its productivity; and cost. 2. Summarize and evaluate the changes between the proposed Plan and the JRPC plan. 3. Determine appropriate performance criteria and use those criteria to evaluate the performance of the proposed system (to be conducted on a system-wide basis and on a corridor basis). 4. Compare the technical, financial and forecast performance of the proposed system to systems in other selected U.S. cities. 5. Advise Council on the soundness of testimony by RTA staff and opposition groups. 6. Evaluate the potential impact of the Plan on Metro/King County bus routes and revenues. In particular, this will focus on routes that will be truncated, re-defined or eliminated. The selected consultant team includes: 1. John Doolitle, Lead Consultant: He has worked for MPTA in Boston and will focus on financial issues. 2. Ben Porter, Local Lead: He has worked as a consultant to the JRPC. Kjng County Council RTA Otwomoteants November 14, 1994 Page 2 3. Bob Korach, Rail Operations Planning Consultant: He has worked for Los Angeles and PATCO. 4. Brian McCollom, Transit Operations and Service Planning Consultant. Our Opportunities for Input to the Consultants We are likely to have two opportunities to provide input to the consultants on the RTA Plan. These opportunities will be through Suburban Cities Association (SCA) meetings scheduled over the next several weeks. Wednesday, November 16 , the exact time and location of this meeting has not yet been settled. The SCA staff (not elected) is tentatively scheduled to meet with the County Council's RTA consultants to discuss issues and concerns. Wednesday, November 30th, the elected officials serving on the SCA Transportation and Transit subcommittees will hold a meeting to discuss the SCA view on the RTA (both Bob Edwards and Tim Schlitzer will be invited to this meeting). SCA members serve on the County Council's Metro Transit Committee and will have an opportunity to vote on a recommendation to the Metropolitan King County Council on December lg. Membership on the Metro Transit Committee includes: Margot Blacker, Bellevue Wally Rants, Tukwila Arun Jhaveri, Burien Mary Gates, Federal Way Nona Ganz, Kirkland Rowan Hinds, Issaquah Clair Drosdick, Normandy Park (Alternate) Jim White, Kent (Alternate) cc: File November 7. 1994 Renton City Council Minutes Pane 459 OLD BUSINESS Planning and Development Committee Chair Keolker-Wheeler presented a Planning & Development report recommending ratification of the King County County-wide Planning Committee Policies, with the following provisions: Planning: King County County-wide Planning 1. The City of Renton continues to support locally-determined growth Policies targets and continues to work with King County to refine methodologies used to establish jurisdictional growth targets. 2. The City of Renton strongly supports inclusion of the Jones Road Joint Planning Area within the Urban Growth Boundary. 3. The City of Renton requests representation on the Regional Finance Forum. The Committee also recommended that Renton continue its ongoing efforts to implement the County-wide Planning Policies and the Comprehensive Plan. MOVED BY KEOLKER-WHEELER, SECONDED BY CORMAN, COUNCIL CONCUR IN THE COMMITTEE REPORT. CARRIED. Building: Cedar River Planning and Development Committee Chair Keolker-Wheeler presented a Court Apts. Fire report regarding the letter from Earl Price requesting a waiver of fire Mitigation Fees mitigation fees for the Cedar River Court Apartments project. The Committee recommended concurrence in the staff recommendation not to waive the fire mitigation fees for this project. MOVED BY KEOLKER- WHEELER, SECONDED BY CORMAN, COUNCIL CONCUR IN THE COMMITTEE REPORT. CARRIED. Planning: Public Use Planning and Development Committee Chair Keolker-Wheeler presented a Suffix/P-1 Zone report regarding public use suffix/P-1 zone assimilation. Because the Assimilation disposition of publicly held properties can impact surrounding areas as well as have financial implications for other agencies, changes affecting ownership, use and occupancy are seen as being in the public interest. As such, special notification of surrounding residents and businesses, as well as other parties of record, including other public agencies, is warranted. Likewise, because such uses are typically special, or secondary uses, in those zones where they are allowed, special development standards to fulfill their public purpose are generally required. The proposed amendments would establish: 1) a public use suffix zoning map designation that would trigger early public notification when publicly held properties are proposed to undergo a change in ownership, use or user; 2) development standards for publicly held secondary uses; 3) provisions allowing some zoning requirements to be exceeded on a temporary basis while new replacement facilities are being constructed on the same site as an existing facility which will be removed when the new facility is finished; and 4) new and modified definitions related to these amendments. The Committee recommended that the City Council schedule a public hearing on these proposed amendments for November 28, 1994. MOVED BY KEOLKER-WHEELER, SECONDED BY CORMAN, COUNCIL CONCUR IN THE COMMITTEE REPORT.* Responding to Council President Stredicke, Councilmember Keolker-Wheeler said the Committee report provides a brief description of the proposal and sets a public hearing to take comments on November 28th. For the record, Mr. Stredicke emphasized that City parks, schools and other public places should not be zoned for a higher use, such as multi-family residential or industrial. Mrs. Keolker-Wheeler replied that the proposed amendments would, among other things, establish a new process to provide notification to the public not only on sales of public property, but also on changes in property use or user. *MOTION CARRIED. Council President Stredicke asked that his "no" vote be recorded. • ADPROVTEJ BY CUWCOUCUL PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT COMMITTEE Date ii-�'�y� COMMITTEE REPORT NOVEMBER 7, 1994 KING COUNTY COUNTYWIDE PLANNING POLICIES (Referred October 24, 1994) The Planning and Development Committee recommends ratification of the King County Countywide Planning Policies with the following provisions: 1 . The City of Renton continues to support locally determined growth targets and will continue to work with King County to refine methodologies used to establish jurisdictional growth targets. 2. The City of Renton strongly supports inclusion of the Jones Road Joint Planning Area within the Urban Growth Boundary. 3. The City of Renton requests representation on the Regional Finance Forum. The Committee also recommends that Renton continue its ongoing efforts to implement the Countywide Planning Policies and the Comprehensive Plan. /d-C-ekel Kathy eolker - Wheeler, Chair Bob Edwards, Vice-Chair Randy Corman, Member • CITY OF RENTON MEMORANDUM CM1 OF RENTON DATE: November 7, 1994 E TO: City Council _ � OFFICE VIA: Mayor Earl Clymer FROM: Gregg Zimmerman, Administrator 6- Planning/Building/Public Works Staff Contact: Allan Johnson, ext. 6187 SUBJECT: King County Countywide Planning Policies ISSUE STATEMENT Phase II of the Countywide Planning Policies have been approved by the King County Council and forwarded to jurisdictions for consideration. These policies will set the context for regional growth and local comprehensive plans. The Countywide Planning Policies will be deemed approved by a City unless they are explicitly disapproved by November 21 , 1994. The Countywide Planning Policies will go into effect unless they are explicitly disapproved by more than 70 % of jurisdictions representing more than 30% of County population. OPTIONS Option 1. Ratify Countywide Planning Policies as proposed. Option 2. Ratify Countywide Planning Policies with provisions about: ITEMS NEEDING RESOLUTION POLICIES WITH THE COUNTY Employment Growth Targets FW-1 Joint Planning Areas FW-1 , Pages 31 - 33 Regional Finance Strategies Pages 78 - 80 Option 3. No Action, Countywide Planning Policies deemed approved. Option 4. Reject Countywide Planning Policies. Countywide Planning F ;ies November 7, 1994 Page 2 RECOMMENDATION Option 2 Option 2 will demonstrate Renton's support for the overall concepts expressed in the Countywide Policies, however, the City can express our position regarding items needing further resolution with the County. BACKGROUND The following 12 point summary presents major amendments that have been added to the Countywide Policies (CPP) during Phase II. These amendments have a variety of implications for the City. Most of these items will require some additional implementation measures or possibly adjustment to the Comprehensive Plan. However, no major changes to the Comprehensive Plan are foreseen. The City has until December, 1995 to make any revisions. In some cases, the City still has unresolved points of concern with the Countywide Planning Policies. These items will require further resolution. The City can ratify this Phase of the Countywide Planning with provisions stating the City's position on these areas of concern. 1. 'SHALL, 'WILL', 'SHOULD, 'MAY' CLAUSE Top of Page 6 • Countywide Planning Policies expressed as a 'shall' or 'will' binds all • jurisdictions to adopt consistent policies or actions. • 'should' statements allow the jurisdictions to specifically set different policies or direction. • jurisdictions are given discretion when 'may' is used. Implications for the City • This.:clause strengthens the requirements of the Countywide Planning . Policies Instead of giving suggest►ons or direction, they create ;mandates for the City to adopt and follow Asa result the :City may be bound to policies which have not been fully agreed upon For example, • The CPP state that jurisdictions;;will remove barriers to:accessory'' units in support of State legislation •:< >The CPP also state that cities `will' accommodate low and moderate ;:;housin tar ets .:.::::... .... . i< s • The CPP:jndicates that.ctres .shall ;establish:mmi,mum :densit.e _ Countywide Planning I ,ies v„r November 7, 1994 Page 3 • :.• ; Potential annexation areas must be establ'►shed ►n cooperation with •; The City will need to ensure that City policies and implementation treasures are consistent with all 'shall' and `will` statements and responds to all `should' statements...:Some additional actions may be necessary to;accomphsh his. 2. URBAN GROWTH BOUNDARY Pages 6 thru 13, Pages 29 thru 31, Appendix 1 • See Appendix 1 for designated Urban Growth Boundary. • The Urban Growth Area may be expanded by a total of 4,000 acres. For each acre added to the Urban Growth Area, however, 4 acres of open • space must be dedicated to the King County Open Space System • Joint Planing Areas established for 6 cities (including Renton) to resolve disputed Urban Growth Boundary. These areas are exempt from open space dedications. Implications for the City • • • •. The Joint Planning Area along Jones Road ►s still ►n dispute and needs`` further resolution. Renton s Position on Items Needing Further Resolution The City supports inclusion of the Jones Road area within the Urban Growth Boundary. 3. GROWTH TARGETS Pages 6 thru 13, Pages 29 thru 31, Pages 46 thru 48, Appendix 2 • Targets establish the amount of new households and new jobs which must.be planned for by each community. • Growth Targets for Renton HOUSEHOLDS County Target ( 7,730 - 10,050) City Target - 7,925 EMPLOYMENT County Target (20,000 - 26,000) City Target - 27,268 rthe<.Cit • Implications fo . y • The inconsistency between the !Renton and the Countywide Planning : ;: :pb ides e.m:plo.ym:ent.giowth,fargets;needs:further resolution .. Countywide Planningicies November 7, 1994 Page 4 • .Renton s Position on Items Needing Further Resolution Renton supports the use of locally determined growth targets: The..City .feels that current estimates are reasonable given the uncertainty of: " '.' fgreeasting and thatevis�ons ere unnecessary 4. CRITICAL AREAS Pages 14 thru 18 • Special provisions have been added to regionally designate and protect aquifers. Implications for the City • Renton will work regionally`to designate aquifer protection areas outside;;o.f ahe City.. :. : 5. RURAL LANDS and COMMUNITY SEPARATORS Pages 20 thru 30 • Densities of one unit per five acres are allowed in most rural areas. • Sewers are allowed on limited basis to resolve health emergencies. • Community separators must remain at low densities and can't be redesignated to urban densities without consent from the County. Implications for he G�ty <: .. ......: Benton w 11 need to exclude areas where densities will reach 5.units per acre from community separators This adjustment can be made prior to final adoption of<the CompYehensive Plan • 6. URBAN CENTER DESIGNATIONS Pages 35 thru 41 • Renton designated as one of 14 Urban Centers Implications for;"the City The City will need to;continue work on strategies to support retlevelopment within th:e Urban Center The City will need to continue developing and implementing ransportation, transit and parking strategies for the Urban Center Countywide Planning I•sricies November 7, 1994 Page 5 7. ACTIVITY AREAS/BUSINESS AND OFFICE PARKS Pages 44 thru 45, Pages 49 thru 50 • The designation of Activity Areas is supported. • The expansion or infill Business and Office Parks is discouraged. Implications for the City `' iiiii .::. The :City should evaluate designating Community Centers and : : Office/Residential Centers as.Activity<Areas • The City should clarify the need for and strategy for future office dev..el.opment in and around the Longacres complex In addition, the City : :should clarify;why:residential development;is not allowed m these :areas 8. HUMAN AND COMMUNITY SERVICES Page 58 • Jurisdictions must incorporate human and community services in their Comprehensive Plans. : •: :: Additional measures should'be added to the City s Comprehensive m ervices .9. AFFORDABLE HOUSING Pages 60 thru 66, Appendix 3 • Local plans must include and support affordable housing targets. • Regional affordable housing strategy will be developed. Implications for the City • The:City will continue its work on supporting,and implementing' regional affor..dablehousi:ng strategies 10.ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT Pages 72 thru 77 • Locals plans must address employment strategies for disadvantaged. • Local plans must support retention of existing job base and manufacturing lands. • Permitting processes should be streamlined. Countywide Planning Nrocies ,isr November 7, 1994 Page 6 The City may want to expand' the E onomro Development Chapter of` the Comprehensive Plan to incor orate the rovisions of the Countywide Planning Policies Policies and strategies addressing the economically disadvantaged are not included (n the present draft The City may want to take additional steps- to streamline permitting ' roce.sses 11. REGIONAL FINANCE and GOVERNANCE • Pages 77 thru 80 • The Finance Plan will address funding of regional infrastructure, redevelopment within Urban Centers and Toxic Site Clean Up. • The Finance Plan will address King County's share of regional finances. • The City's eligibility for regional funding is dependent upon participation in this forum • .;:<•.> The Regional Financial Forum its members and its mission have not been fully established The establishment of this 'Forum and Renton's involvement with it will require<furthe.r resolution • The. •Cit•y• will .need to .closely.evaluate- the potentia} financia mpacts on the City which are..currently unknown" ; Renton's Position on Items Needing Further Resolution The Regional Finance Forum will set regional finance strategies It will be composed of members from many junsdictrons and will primarily staffed by King County. The City requests:representation on the Regional Finance Forum so that the City can adequately evaluate, articulate and advocate its positron on i sues of regional finance 12. BENCHMARKS AND MONITORING PROGRAM Pages 6 thru 13 and Throughout the Document • This program will be used to track housing stock, housing costs, economic growth. • This program will be used to adjust policies and growth boundary. .. .:.:.:. . .. ...: .:..::::::::::.::.. <;>Tfe City will need to commit to tracking and analysis of growth October 24, 1994 fir.® Renton City Council Minutes Page 439 Ordinance #4480 Following second and final reading of the above-referenced ordinance, it was Finance: 1994 MOVED BY TANNER, SECONDED BY CORMAN, COUNCIL ADOPT THE Water/Sewer Revenue ORDINANCE AS PRESENTED. ROLL CALL: ALL AYES. CARRIED. Bonds NEW BUSINESS Council President Stredicke complimented the City's street maintenance crew Streets: Maintenance Crew for the good job done of laying new asphalt and re-striping in the Highlands. Commendation King County: County- Noting the November 21st deadline for responding to King County regarding wide Planning Policies the proposed County-wide planning policies, it was MOVED BY KEOLKER- WHEELER, SECONDED BY STREDICKE, COUNCIL REFER THE PROPOSED COUNTY-WIDE PLANNING POLICIES TO THE PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT COMMITTEE. CARRIED. Police: Hit-and-Run Councilmember Keolker-Wheeler noted correspondence received from Dick Fatality of Bicycle Rider Pado, Dottie Smith and Rodger Herbst regarding the hit-and-run fatality of a bicycle rider on October 13th. MOVED BY KEOLKER-WHEELER, SECONDED BY CORMAN, COUNCIL REFER THIS CORRESPONDENCE TO THE ADMINISTRATION (POLICE DEPARTMENT) FOR A RESPONSE WITH A COPY BACK TO COUNCIL. CARRIED. AUDIENCE COMMENT Sarah McDonald, PO Box 1825, Renton, 98057, stated that her property taxes Citizen Comment: have increased more than five-fold since 1986, and doubted whether she could McDonald - 1995 afford a similar increase in the future. Adding that the City's Police Budget/Resident Tax Department deserves passage of its November public safety bond issue, she Burden questioned, however, whether residents will be able to sustain the financial impact. ADJOURNMENT MOVED BY KEOLKER-WHEELER, SECONDED BY SCHLITZER, COUNCIL ADJOURN. CARRIED. Time: 8:12 p.m. itcnae& BRENDA FRITSVOLD, Deputy City Clerk *Iv ,4110 CITY OF RENTON MEMORANDUM DATE: October 24, 1994 CAI TO: Kathy Keolker-Wheeler Chair, Planning and Development Committee r ; ()FRCP FROM: Mike Kattermann (ext. 6190)k . ° ` SUBJECT: RATIFICATION OF COUNTYWIDE PLANNING POLICIES Copies of the King County Countywide Planning Policies were distributed to the City Council in September. Renton and other jurisdictions in King County have until November 21, 1994 to act on the proposed policies. If no action is taken by that time, they are deemed to be ratified. Staff is preparing an issue paper that will be distributed to the City Council this week. Given the tight time frame, the full schedule of the Committee of the Whole, and the familiarity of the Planning and Development Committee with these issues, I would request that you refer this item to the Planning and Development Committee from the floor at the City Council meeting tonight. I have talked to Billie about scheduling a special Planning and Development Committee meeting for Tuesday, November 1, 1994 at 3:30 p.m. in the 5th floor conference room. Thank you for your assistance in this matter. cc: Mayor Clymer Jay Covington Gregg Zimmerman Marilyn Petersen CITY OF RENTON MEMORANDUM DATE: September 21, 1994 TO: City Council VIA: Mayor Clymer FROM: Gregg Zimmerman, Administrator G- Planning/Building/Public Works '" CONTACT: Mike Kattermann, Director(ext. 6190) Planning and Technical Services SUBJECT: RATIFICATION OF COUNTYWIDE PLANNING POLICIES The Metropolitan King County Council adopted and ratified the Countywide Planning Policies on August 15, 1994. Based on our interlocal agreement, the policies must be ratified by 30% of the jurisdictions representing 70% of the population. If a jurisdiction does not act by November 21, 1994, then the policies are deemed to have been ratified. Renton was extensively involved in the drafting of and amendments to the policies throughout the process both at the technical and political level. Councilman Bob Edwards, as a delegate from the Suburban Cities Association, is a member of the Growth Management Planning Council (GMPC) that developed and recommended the policies to the County Council. Although staff believes that the City's Comprehensive Plan is consistent with the Countywide Policies, we are still in the process of analyzing all of the policies' impacts on Renton. The policies are being transmitted to the City Council now to provide you ample time to review the document prior to a vote on ratification. The Suburban Cities Association will also be meeting to discuss the policies on Wednesday, September 28, 1994, from 7:00 p.m. to 9:00 p.m. in Room A of the Renton Community Center. Staff will bring a recommendation on ratification forward to the City Council by the end of October. t7 c CITY OF RENTON King County SEP 2 3 1994 RECEIVED CITY CLERK'S OFFICE September 9, 1994 The Honorable Earl Clymer Mayor City of Renton 200 Mill Avenue South Renton, WA 98055 Dear Mayor Clymer: Re: King County Countywide Planning Policies - Ratification by Cities We are pleased to forward for your consideration and ratification the amended Countywide Planning Policies. The Countywide Planning Policies (CPPs) were first adopted in July of 1992. After an exhaustive review process, amendments to those initial policies were adopted by the Growth Management Planning Council (GMPC) on May 25, 1994. In accordance with our interlocal agreement that established the GMPC, the Metropolitan King County Council adopted and ratified the amended CPPs on August 15, 1994. The King County 2012 Countywide Planning Policies become effective when ratified by at least thirty percent of the city and county governments, representing seventy percent of the population of King County. A city will be deemed to have ratified the policies unless by legislative action it disapproves them by November 21, 1994. To assist in your review of the CPPs, you will find that amendments proposed and approved by the GMPC are underlined and subsequent changes added by the Metropolitan King County Council are shaded. The proposed amendments represent significant compromises by the representatives of the County, Seattle, and Suburban Cities to establish a new framework for managing growth in King County. We hope you will join us and ratify these policies on behalf of our region. *400 The Honorable Earl Clymer September 9, 1994 Page Two If you have any questions, please feel free to contact us, Rebecha Cusack, Lead Staff to the Metropolitan King County Council's Growth Management Committee at 296-0330, or Craig Larsen, Acting Director of the Parks, Planning and Resources Department at 296- 7503. Thank you for your consideration. Sincerely, Kent Pullen. Chair Gary Loc - King County Council King County Executive Chris Vance, Chair Growth Management, Housing & Environment Committee cc: Cynthia Sullivan, Vice Chair Growth Management, Housing & Environment Committee Rebecha Cusack, Legislative Analyst Robin Appleford, Intergovernmental Relations Cliff Petersen, Council Coordinator Jerry Peterson, Council Administrator Craig Larsen, Acting Director.. Parks, Planning &Resources Department f y ), Jane Hague July 19, 1994 Introduced By: Chris Vance orcppIlmmc/rc.719 Proposed No. : 94-386 1 1. 1445 2 ORDINANC E NO. 3 AN ORDINANCE adopting amendments to the 4 Countywide Planning Policies pursuant to RCW 5 36.70A.210; ratifying the amended Countywide Planning 6 Policies for unincorporated King County; amending 7 Ordinance 10450, adding new sections to K.C.C. 20.10, 8 and repealing Ordinance 10450, Section 3 and K.C.C. 9 20.10.030. 10 BE IT ORDAINED BY THE COUNCIL OF KING COUNTY: 11 SECTION 1. FINDINGS. The council makes the following findings. - 12 A. Beginning in the fall of 1991, King County, the City of Seattle and the 13 Suburban Cities of King County met jointly as the Growth Management 14 Planning Council to develop and recommend Countywide Planning Policies 15 for King County, as mandated by the Growth Management Act, RCW 16 36.70A.210. 17 B. In July of 1992, the King County Council adopted the Countywide Planning . 18 Policies recommended to it by the Growth Management Planning Council. 19 The Countywide Planning Policies adopted at that time have generally been 20 referred to as Phase I. At that time, the Policies as adopted contemplated 21 completion of a Phase II of countywide policies, to address issues not dealt 22 with in sufficient detail in Phase I. 23 C. The particular issues to be addressed in Phase II included designation of urban 24 centers for purposes of pursuing a regional transit plan, affordable housing, 25 economic development, rural character, the preparation of a detailed fiscal 26 analysis of the Countywide Planning Policies, and completion of a draft and a 27 final Environmental Impact Statement. 28 D. Since July 1992, the Growth Management Planning Council, working with 29 task forces to address the specific topics identified for further work in Phase 30 II, has developed recommended amendments to the adopted Countywide 31 Planning Policies. 32 E. On May 25, 1994,The Growth Management Planning Council took final 33 action recommending Phase II amendments to the Phase I Countywide 34 Planning Policies. The GMPC recommendations can be found in the 35 document entitled Recommended Amendments to King County 2012 36 Countywide Planning Policies. Adopted by the King County Growth 37 Management Planning Council May 25. 1994. Urban Growth Area maps 38 provided in Appendix 1 are intended for policy planning purposes. The Urban 39 Growth Area contained in these policies is a dynamic policy line which 40 provides general guidance to the Metropolitan King County Council when it 41 adopts the final Urban Growth Boundary in its 1994 Comprehensive Plan. M:\gmhe\ordmot\orcppIlmmc/rc 3:04 PM 7/29/94 - 1 - Sitie 1. 11446 ' r 1 F. The Metropolitan King County government finds that any pertinent growth related 2 issues not addressed in these Countywide Planning Policies, such as proposed urban 3 growth areas for newly incorporated cities, shall be handled in a manner pursuant to 4 State law, until or unless they are proposed by the GMPC or its successor as 5 amendments to these Countywide Planning Policies. 6 G. The Metropolitan King County Council finds that the final report of the Fiscal Impact 7 Analysis and Economic Development Task Force, May 4. 1994 which was 8 transmitted to the GMPC on May 4, 1994 meets the requirements of county 9 Ordinance#10450, and RCW 36.70A.210. 10 H. The Metropolitan King County Council finds that the existing environmental 11 documents adopted by King County on May 5, 1992,the supporting addendum 12 issued on June 18, 1992,the Draft Supplemental Environmental Impact Statement for 13 Countywide Planning Policies issued by King County on January 12, 1994, the 14 Summary of Public Involvement 1993-1994 for the Supplemental Environmental 15 Impact Statement,and the Final Supplemental Environmental Impact Statement for 16 the Countywide Planning Policies issued by King County on May 18, 1994, are 17 adequate under SEPA for the purposes of the county's adoption of amendments to the 18 Countywide Planning Policies. 19 I. The amendments to the King County 2012 Countywide Planning Policies adopted 20 herein are substantially consistent with the recommendations of the GMPC, but make 21 technical corrections to further clarify the Countywide Planning Policies. 22 J. With these amendments, the King County 2012 Countywide Planning 23 Policies are further enhanced and refined, and provide clearer direction to all 24 the jurisdictions in the county concerning the location and extent of Urban 25 Centers, approaches to affordable housing and economic development, and 26 the treatment of rural areas. As such they bear a substantial relationship to, 27 and are necessary for, the public health, safety, and general welfare of King 28 County and its residents. 29 SECTION 2. Ordinance 10450, Section 3, and K.C.C. 20.10.030 are each repealed and 30 the following is substituted: 31 The Phase I1 Amendments to the King County 2012 Countywide Planning Policies 32 attached to this ordinance are hereby approved and adopted. 33 SECTION 3. Ordinance 10450, Section 4, and K.C.C. 20.10.040 hereby each amended 34 to read as follows: 3 5 A. Countywide Planning Policies adopted by Ordinance 10450 for the purposes specified 36 are hereby ratified on behalf of the population of unincorporated King County. 37 B. The amendments to Countywide Planning Policies adopted by Ordinance 10840 are 38 hereby ratified on behalf of the population of unincorporated King County. 39 C. The amendments to the Countywide Planning Policies adopted by Ordinance 11061 40 are hereby ratified on behalf of the population of unincorporated King County. M:\gmhe\ordmot\orcppllmmc/rc 3:04 PM 7/29/94 - 2 - 1144b 1 P. The Phase II Amendments to the King County 2012 Countywide Planning Policies is aS�S2 9�X th 2 ordinance are hereby ratified on behalf of the population of unincorporated 3 King County. 4 SECTION 4. Ordinance 10450, Section 5, and K.C.C. 20.10.050 are each amended to 5 read as follows: 6 A. The Countywide Planning Policies adopted by Ordinance 10450 shall become 7 effective when ratified by ordinance or resolution by at least thirty percent of the city and 8 county governments representing seventy percent of the population of King County 9 according to the interlocal agreement. A city shall be deemed to have ratified the 10 Countywide Planning Policies unless, within ninety days of adoption by King County, the 11 city by legislative action disapproves the Countywide Planning Policies. 12 B. The Countywide Planning Policies adopted by Ordinance 10840 shall become 13 effective when ratified by ordinance or resolution by at least thirty percent of the city and 14 county governments representing seventy percent of the population of King County 15 according to the interlocal agreement. A city shall be deemed to have ratified the 16 Countywide Planning Policies unless, within ninety days of adoption by King County, the 17 city by legislative action disapproves the Countywide Planning Policies. 18 C. The Countywide Planning Policies adopted by Ordinance 11061 shall become 19 effective when ratified by ordinance or resolution by at least thirty percent of the city and 20 county governments representing seventy percent of the population of King County 21 according to the interlocal agreement. A city shall be deemed to have ratified the 22 Countywide Planning Policies unless, within ninety days of adoption King County, the city 23 by legislative action disapproves the Countywide Planning Policies. 24 D. The King County 2012 Countywide Planning Policies adopted by this ordinance shall 25 become effective when ratified by ordinance or resolution by at least thirty percent of the 26 city and county governments,representing seventy percent of the population of King 27 County according to the interlocal agreement. A city shall be deemed to have ratified the 28 King_County 2012 Countywide Planning Policies unless. within ninety days of adoption by 29 King County. the city by legislative action disapproves the King County 2012 Countywide 30 planning Policies. M:\gmhe\ordmot\orcppIImmc/rc 3:04 PM 7/29/94 - 3 - • 11440v1 , 1 SECTION 5. Ordinance 10450, Section 6, and K.C.C. 20.10.060 are each amended to 2 read as follows: 3 20.10.060 Implementation. (( 4 ' • 5 6 7 8 .)) Land capacity availability and 9 redevelopment assumptions that underlie the recommended Urban Growth Area will be 1 o closely monitored by the Metropolitan King County government subsequent to adoption of 11 the final Urban Growth Area through annual benchmarking and monitoring reports. An 12 affordable housing committee. a land capacity task force and a growth monitoring advisory 13 committee have been called for by the Countywide Planning Policies and the county • M:\gmhe\ordmot\orcppllmmc/rc 3:04 PM 7/29/94 - 4 - 11446 6 1 council intends to promptly convene such groups.the purpose of which is to review data 2 on land capacity and housing affordability to ensure that the Growth Management Act 3 requirements regarding Urban Growth Areas are being met. To further enhance those 4 efforts a technical committee to facilitate environmental protection shall be established by 5 January1995 to serve as a depository of regulations and policies adopted by jurisdictions in 6 King County. 7 INTRODUCED AND READ for the first time this 07O 4day of 8 , 19?1 9 ASSED by a vote of // to d this /S day of , 19 �y 10 KING COUNTY COUNCIL 11 KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON 12 13 Chair 14 ATTEST: 15 16 vesci yvikj\M-44144) lerk of the Council h 17 APPROVED this day of , 19?f 18 . - 19 King County E ecutive 20 Attachments: 21 22 A. Recommended Amendments to King County 2012 Countywide Planning Policies 23 Adopted by the King County Growth Management Planning Council May 25, 1994 24 (Revisions by MKCC Staff 7.19.94) 25 B. Draft Supplemental Environmental Impact Statement for the Countywide Planning 26 Policies 27 C. Summary of Public Involvement 1993-1994 for the Supplemental Environmental 28 Impact Statement 29 D. Final Supplemental Environmental Impact Statement for the Countywide Planning 30 Policies Proposed Amendments 31 E. Fiscal Analysis and Economic Development Task Force Final Report, May 4, 1994 32 M:\gmhe\ordmot\orcppIImmc/rc 3:04 PM 7/29/94 - 5 - ' INCOR+ 2ATES AMENDMENTS ADOPTED 5/94 BY MKCC 1 Recommended Amendments to King County 2012 2 Countywide Planning Policies 3 Adopted by the King County Growth Management Planning Council 4 • May 25, I994 • 5 Revisions`by<MKCC staff7994 6 7 A. The Problem s King County has long been known for unsurpassed natural beauty and a dynamic 9 human environment. It has thriving cities and suburbs and healthy rural communities. 10 The county's attractive lifestyle and economy continue to draw people into our region. 11 But unmanaged growth and development endanger some of those very qualities. 12 An additional 325,000 people will live here by the year 2010 (State of Washington Offic 13 of Financial Management), bringing the total population to 1.8 million. While growth 14 fuels the area's strong economy, the absence of effective management of that growth 1 threatens the features that are essential to a rich quality of life. 16 The effects of uncoordinated and unplanned growth are obvious. King County h2 i the fifth worst traffic mess in the nation, declining air and water quality, flooding 18 aggravated by development, and escalating housing costs. Many of the schools are over- 19 crowded and local governments are struggling to pay for increased demands for services 20 to control crime and to provide critical human resources. 21 The need facing the County and State is to provide the incentives necessary to 22 promote a vigorous, sound. and diversified economy, while reducing, controlling and 23 managing the potential adverse effects of uncoordinated and unplanned growth. 24 The Washington State Legislature passed the Growth Management Act (GMA) in 25 1990 and strengthened it in 1991.to address these problems. 26 B. The Process 27 Growth management involves planning for economic and population growth, 28 determining where new jobs and housing should go and then locating and phasing 29 population growth in accordance with the ability to provide infrastructure and services. 30 This should include economic development, a workable transportation system, quality 31 drinking water, affordable housing, good schools, open space and parks and, at the same 32 .time, protection of our natural environment. 33 King County and the 34 cities within it are addressing growth management 34 problems together and in their local jurisdictions. Planning at both levels is called for b} 1 • fl446 ; the Growth Management Act. 2 All jurisdictions are working together to develop a vision for the future. This 3 vision is embodied in this series of policies called Countywide Planning Policies. 4 • Realization of this vision involves trade-offs and difficult choices.about the appropriate 5 level of growth, its location, the type of growth to be encouraged, public spending, 6 governance decisions, environmental protection, and the quality of life in King County. 7 A formal body, the Growth Management Planning Council, with elected officials 8 from Seattle, the suburban cities, and King County, ((#ies)) considered ((these)) draft 9 policies in May 1992, and based on public input, ((will tie)) made a recommendation o the King County Council for adoption. King County Council adopted the initial 11 Countywide Planning Policies in July 1992 by Ordinance #10450, The Ordinance adopt( 12 the Phase I Policies and initiated a Phase Ii work program which called for environment: 13 and fiscal analysis and additional work on economic development rural character 14 transportation and affordable housing. The Phase I Countywide Planning Policies were riit ed h% Seattle and the suburban cities in October 1992. (( 16 17 I !Hiiiicntfon.)) 18 The Growth Management Planning Council initiated the Phase II Work Program 19 I October I Q92 and formed three Task Forces comprised of elected officials and citizens V 20 ! develop policy recommendations and a Transportation Caucus to develop transportation 21 strategies These included the Affordable Housing Task Force. Rural Character Task 22 Force and F►s/Ed (Fiscal Impact Analysis and Economic Development) Task Force, The 23 Fis/Ed Task Force was responsible for conducting the fiscal analysis required for the 24 Countywide Planning Policies as well as developing policy recommendations on econom 2 development At the completion of the Phase Ii work, on May 25. ((2))1994 the GMP( 26 made polic` recommendations to the Metropolitan King County Council. King County 27 will adopt ({the)) policies and then submit them for ratification to the cities, 28 The Countywide Planning Policies, as amended through the Phase II work. ((will 29 serve as the framework for each jurisdiction's own comprehensive plan, which must be 30 consistent with Countywide Planning Policies ((ieee)) by December'31 '1995 31 199((3))5)))). These individual comprehensive plans throughout the county, then, will b 32 .consistent with the overall vision for the future of King County. 33 C. The Growth Management Act cppph2. 07/19/94 2 some • 1 The GMA fundamentally changes the way that comprehensive planning is to be 2 done and land use decisions are to be made in Washington State. The challenge of GMA 3 is to establish a countywide vision and devise a strategy to achieve it. This includes • 4 . balancing growth, economics, land use, infrastructure, and finance. If resources are 5 inadequate to realize the vision, then the strategies and land use must be revised. The 6 GMA require((s))d Countywide Planning Policies to be adopted by July 1, 1992. At a 7 minimum, the policies ((mot)) were to address: 8 • a. Implementation of RCW 36.70A.110 (Urban Growth Areas); 9 b. Promotion of contiguous and orderly development and provision of urban 10 services; 11 c. Siting of public capital facilities; 12 d. Transportation facilities and strategies; 13 e: Affordable housing; 14 f. Joint county and city planning within Urban Growth Areas; 15 g. Countywide economic development and employment; and 16 h. Analysis of fiscal impact. 17 Special emphasis is placed on transportation. Future development activity will be 18 constrained by a jurisdiction's ability to provide and finance transportation improvements 19 or strategies. This fact has implications for all jurisdictions who can no longer finance 20 and build the facilities necessary to retain current service levels. 21 D. Vision for King County 2012 22 Our county has significantly changed in the 20 years that have elapsed from 1992 23 to today. The paramount cause for this change has been the successful public/private 24 partnership which has: supported a diversified, sound regional economy; managed and 25 accommodated growth: and maintained the county's quality of life. 26 An effective stewardship of the environment has preserved and protected the 27 critical areas in the county. This stewardship has extended to the conservation of our 28 land, air, water and energy resources for future generations. 29 The rural areas first formally identified in 1985 and expanded in 1992 remain 30 permanently preserved with a clear boundary between rural and urban areas. 31 Development has emphasized the use and reuse of the existing urbanized areas. 32 .Much of the new growth after 1992 first occurred in the areas where there was existing 33 capacity. Growth then occurred where existing infrastructure could be easily extended or cppph2. 07/19/94 3 1 1 enhanced. Lastly, areas which required significant new investment in infrastructure 2 accommodated growth. Today, there still is ample room for new development within the 3 • urban area. 4 Much of the growth in employment,.and a significant share of new housing, has 5 occurred in Urban Centers. These Centers now provide a mixture of employment, 6 residential, commercial, cultural and recreational opportunities. The centers are linked 7 by the high-capacity transit system, and transit stations within the centers are located 8 within walking distance to all parts of the center. Each center has its own unique 9 character, and they are all noted for their livability, pedestrian orientation and superior 1 o design. 1 i Smaller concentrations of businesses are distributed throughout the urban area, and 12 focus on providing goods and services to surrounding residential areas. They are linked 13 to Urban Centers by an effective local transit system. 14 Manufacturing/industrial areas continue to thrive and be key components in the 15 urban area. They are served by a transportation system which emphasizes the movement 16 of people and goods to and within these areas. 17 Rural cities provide unique environments within the rural area and provide 18 commercial and employment opportunities for their residents. This includes retail, 19 educational and social services for city residents and surrounding rural areas. Businesses 20 in rural cities provide employment opportunities for local residents. 21 The entire urban area is increasingly characterized by superior urban design and ar 22 open space network which defines and separates, yet links the various urban areas and 23 jurisdictions. Countywide and regional facilities have been located where needed, sited 24 unobtrusively and with appropriate incentives and proper impact mitigation. 25 Attractive and workable alternatives to the single-occupant vehicle have been built 26 and strategies adopted which assure the mobility of people, goods and information 27 throughout the county and beyond. 28 Regional funds have been used to further the regional land use plan and fund 29 needed regional facilities. Local resources have been focused on local facilities. The 30 sharing of resources to accomplish common goals is done so that the regional plan can 31 succeed and so that all can benefit. 32 The economy is vibrant and sustainable, and emphasizes diversity in the range of 33 goods produced and services provided. Businesses continue to locate in our county cppph2. 07/19/94 4 1 because of the high quality of life, the emphasis on providing a superior education, and 2 the predictability brought about by the management of growth and the effectiveness of the 3 public/private partnership in these areas as well as the mutually beneficial partnership in 4 • economic development: • 5 Housing opportunities for all incomes and.lifestyles exist throughout the county, 6 and with the balanced transportation system, access to employment is assured. 7 The needs of residents are attended to by a social service system that emphaci7.-s 8 prevention, but which stands ready to respond to direct needs as well. 9 The•urban area is located within the incorporated cities, which are the primary i o urban service providers. Where appropriate, sub-regional consortiums have been created 11 for certain services, and the county government is recognized as a regional service 12 provider. 13 Through a clear understanding of growth management, residents and businesses 14 have recognized that all problems will not be cured quickly, but clear and reasonable 15 timelines and financing commitments demonstrate to them that problems will be solved. 16 Residents and businesses trust in their local governments because the plans and promises 17 .made to manage growth in 1992 have been followed. Change is accepted and proceeds in 18 an orderly fashion based on the growth management plan. 19 20 E. The Framework Policies 21 The GMA gives local officials new tools for planning and, for the first time, 2 2 mandates that the county and cities work together to establish an overall vision. Through 23 a collaborative process. the local jurisdictions of King County have prepared the following 24 ((druft)) Countywide Planning Policies. ((This-process rel )) These policies rely on local 25 choice to determine the density/intensity and character of each area. All jurisdictions 26 must recognize that the smart, long term choices for the region will require compromises 27 in local self-determination. 28 These policies represent a cohesive set and are not individual, stand-alone 29 concepts. The ideas represented here balance each other to establish a vision for the 30 county which builds on existing land use patterns. The policies are organized by topics in 31 separate chapters. At the beginning of each chapter is a framework policy which 32 establishes the overall direction for the following policies. The Countywide Planning 33 Policies can only be realized through local plans and regulations. A decision made locally cppph2. 07/19/94 5 11446 400 1 must become a commitment that the region can rely upon. The following framework 2 policies outline the countywide planning process. 3 When crnmty�vid� libv> tatffi;st ainirit�a "S11alI" ozTM'4vil" cJQ sometfiuip 4 such a policy requires the iunsiiicfiotit comprehenstive plan to contaiin a y that is • hen 4a` ttyywi icy 5 written<toacxomti7ish�'the�`our�se of>ihe cotmtYv��e •�t :`W` '. 6 states that a uci icti rn "shoulfd"°: o:some m thi yr+ }teZuri diction that is �vrtiten�to~a comvLsh he 7 com�henstven.to.can a� . 8 countywide licy unless She jurisdiction n lift ns. has:not diiitei&WWher 9 countywide volicy.:states that_a junsnich n"" y"`>xiv ometf ing. s clt>a➢o icy es 10 the junsdictionl:comrehensive. 1ontair "a D Dplani vOlicy*rittcnto ammnilSfii flecu 11 the countywide-pol.icyif it is in their'interest, 12 FW-1. Countywide growth management is a multi ((€acre))-step process: 13 STEP 1: The Countywide Planning Policies became ((sill-beeeme)) effective 14 October 1992, upon adoption by the King County Council and ratification by at least 1 thirty percent of the city and county governments representing seventy percent of the 16 population in King County. (((September 1992 target date))) 17 STEP 2: The Growth Management Planning Council (GMPC) reconvened to 18 conduct environmental and fiscal impact analysis of the Countywide Planning Policies ant 19 to consider policy amendments developed through implementation of tasks specified in the 20 Countywide Planning Polices. When adopted by the Metropolitan King County'Counc l 21 and ratified ((T)). these actions are considered the Phase Ii policy amendments and 22 include: 23 a Confirmation of Urban Centers according to the procedures and criteria 24 established in policies LU-39 and LU-40: 5 h. Confirmation of Manufacturitj/industrial Centers based on theprocedure 26 and criteria established policies in LU-51 and LU-52, 27 c Adoption of 20 year targets of projected household and employment 28 growth countywide and target ranges for each iurisdiction according to the procedures an( 29 criteria in policy LU-67 and LU-68; 30 d. Confirmation of the Urban Growth Area based on criteria established in 31 policy LU-26.((:)) The Urban.Growth Area inlheCountywidePlanning' Polices. is•;� 32 planning policy framework ttrbe used by the Metropolitan :King County Council when it 33 adopts the final Urban Growth Area in its 1994.:ComprehensivePian, and cppph2. 07/19/94 6 e. Adoption of additional 4oiicv amendments based on the recommendation 2 pf the Rural Character Task Force. She Affordable-Housing Task Force. the Fi l iaa 3 1rialvsis and Economic Development Task Fortes and pun. comments on the 4 Countywide Planning Policies. 5 (( • 6 • 7 a 8 • • 10 11 LU 51 and LU 52, and population ranges recommend 12 committee. (December 1952-tafget-flete) 13 14 15 • e . 16 (December 1992 target date))) 17 f((d-)) Housing and jobs to accommodate King County's ((projected 18 tion)) growth targets shall be planned in the context of carrying capacity of the 19 land. Housing density and affordability shall be considered co-equal objectives. 20 (l 21 22 0 .)) 23 STEP 3: The Countywide Planning Policies shall be implemented as follows: 24 a. All jurisdictions shall make the decisions required to implement the 25 Countywide Planning Policies into their respective comprehensive plans. (July ((1993)) 26 199-1 target date) • 27 b. All jurisdictions shall make the decisions required to.implement the 28 Countywide Planning Policies and their respective comprehensive plans through 29 development regulations. ( )) 30 ((STEP 4: a. The CMPC shall rccon'cnc in July 1993 or sooner e& needed to 31 , 32 33 o cppph . 07/19/94 7 11446 . . . . • 2 te))) 3 g,.(():)) .The GMPC p >scsvr shall establish a process for resolving 4 • conflicts'between local plans and•the Countywide Planning Policies.(( 5 , 6 or local plans. (July 1994 target date))) 7 0_,((e7)) Phase 11 Amendments to the Countywide Planning Policies shall be 8 subject to ratification by at least thirty percent of the city and county governments 9 representing seventy of the population in King County. All jurisdictions shall amend 1 o comprehensive plans as needed by Decembei 3t 1995 ((ikit )l to be consistent witt 11 adopted and ratified Phase 11 amendments. (( )) 12 (( 13 14 regulations. (.114y 1994 target date))) 15 STEP 4: Following adoption of comprehensive plans, the GMPC or its successor 16 shall review adopted household and employment target ranges and estimated capacity for 17 each turisdiction to ensure sufficient capacity within the Urban Growth Area. 18 a. Each jurisdiction shall report to the GMPC or its successor the householc 19 and employment targets adopted in its comprehensive plan, and the estimated capacity foe 20 household and employment growth for the next 20 years. Jurisdictions containing Urban 21 and/or Manufacturing/industrial Centers shall report household and employment target 22 ranges both for Centers and areas outside Centers. Each jurisdiction shall also evaluate 23 the availability of infrastructure, as adopted in six-year capital improvement plans. to 24 ensure that capacity is availahle to accommodate a six year estimate of household and 25 employment growth. 26 b. The GMPC or its successor shall review_growth targets and capacity for 27 each jurisdiction to assure that local targets are within the adopted ranges and countywide 28 capacity is sufficient to meet 20 year growth targets. If a discrepancy exists between 29 growth targets and capacity, either within an individual comprehensive plan or for the 30 County as a whole, the GMPC or its successor shall recommend amendments to 31 Countywide Planning Policies or local clans to ensure that growth targets can be achieve 32 by planned zoning and infrastructure capacity. 33 STEP 5. The GMPC or its successor shall establish a Land Capacity Task cppph2. 07/19/94 8 Force to accomplish the work =gram )eared in ADa 1994 (See Appendix 4), 2 STEP 6. The OMPC or its successor shall recommend to the Menitps itan 3 King County Council a tnonitorinE-a d benchmarks Program to assess progress in meetin; 4 • Countywide Planning Policies. • 5 g. The GMPC or ilssucc ssor shall establish a Growth management 6 monitoring advisory committee which shall recommend information to >ze reported 7 annually to serve as indicators and benchmarks for growth managementpoltcies, The 8 annual reporting shall incorporate the economic development policy indicators developed 9 by the Fiscal impact Analysis and Economic Development Task Force and other indicator 10 as_adopted by the GMPC or its successor. and shall consider housing,indicators specified 11 in policy AH-5. King County shall report the adopted growth management benchmarks 12 annually. 13 b. The GMPC or its successor should conduct a comprehensive evaluation tc 14 assess implementation of the Countywide Planning Policies, The evaluation should be 15 initiated as indicated by results of the monitoring program. but no earlier than five years 16 after adoption of the Phase Ii Amendments to the Countywide Planning Policies. The 17 evaluation shall include opportunities for public involvement. is c. if the purposes of these planning policies are not being achieved as 19 evidenced by results of benchmarks and monitoring reports. the GMPC or its successor 20 will reconvene at the request of a party to discuss, evaluate and recommend actions to 21 achieve the purposes of the policies. 22 STEP 7. The Countywide Planning Policies are based on an urban centers 23 concept, growth phasing strategy. and establishment of an Urban Growth Area. King 24 County shall actively pursue dedication of open space along the Urban Growth Area 25 boundary with a goal of creating a contiguous band of open space north and south along 26 the Urban Growth Area boundary. When future growth requires additional capacity 27 beyond what exists in the main urban area.jurisdictions should look first to the main 2 s urban area. and then to the rural cities and their expansion'areas to accommodate new 29 growth. This program shall follow the 1994 adoption of the final Urban Growth Area.b. 3 0 the Metropolitan King County Council, 31 a. Rural land, excluding agriculturally zoned land may be added to the 32 .Urban Growth Area only in exchange for a dedication of permanent open space to the 3 3 King County Open Space System. The dedication must consist of a minimum of four cppph2. 07/19/94 9 i .L4Ickb 400 acres of=en mace deticated for every one acre of land added to the Urban Growth 2 Area._calculated in gross acres. The open space land shall be dedicated at the time_the 3 •application is approved. 4 . • b. Land added to the Urban Growth Area adopted in the 1994 Countywide 5 Planning Policies must be physically contiguous to the existing Urban Growth Area. and 6 must be able to be served by sewers and other urban services. 7 8 c. The total area increased as a result of this policy shall not exceed 4.000 9 acres. 2.0 d. .Development on the land added to the Urban Growth Area under this 11 policy shall be limited to residential development and shall be at a minimum density of 4 12 units to the acre. Proposals shall meet King County Comprehensive Plan density and 13 affordable housing goals, 14 e. Open space areas shall remain in rural designations and should generally 15 he dedicated in such a way that it can connect with open space on adjacent properties, 16 Open space areas should generally parallel the urban-rural line, according to criteria in k. 17 below. 18 f. The minimum depth of the open space buffer between the proposed 19 addition to the Urban Growth Area and the Rural Area shall be at least one-half of the 20 property width. 21 g The minimum size of property to be considered will be 20 acres. which 22 includes both the proposed addition to the Urban Growth Area and the land proposed for 23 open space dedication. Smaller properties may be combined to meet the 20 acre criterion 24 h. Initial proposals for open space dedication and urban development must b 25 received between July 1 . 1994 and June 30. 1996. Review by King County shall concluc 26 by June 30, 1997. 27 i. Where applications are adjacent to city boundaries or.potential annexation 28 areas. King County shall consult with and solicit recommendations from the city. 29 1. The King County Executive will evaluate proposals for quality of open 30 space and urban development. The highest quality proposals will be recommended by tht 31 Executive to the Metropolitan Kine County Council for adoption. This adoption will 32 constitute an amendment to the Urban Growth Area. If the 4.000 acre limit on land adde 33 to the Urban Growth Area is not reached in the first round of proposals, due to either cppph22. 117/19/94 10 1 fit. i V 1 insufficient number of proposals or masa s-9f insufficient quality. additional rounds of 2 applications maxim accented King County will set the application and review periods fo' 3 any additional rounds. 4 k. Criteria for evaluating proposals shall include: 5 1. the quality of wildlife habitat areas; 6 2. connections to regional open space systems: 7 3. protection of wetlands. stream corridors and water bodies; 8 4, unique natural features: 9 5. the amount of dedicated open space and connections between io dedicated open space lands along the urban rural boundary: and 11 6. ability to provide efficient urban Povernmental services to lands to be 12 added to the Urban Growth Area, 13 1. Proposals which add more than 200 acres to the Urban Growth Area shall 14 include affordable housing consistent with King County.policies_for urban planned 15 developments. As an incentive for additional affordable housing development, the 16 required open space dedication shall be 3.5 acres for each_acre added to the Urban 17 Growth Area for proposals smaller than 200 acres that provide 30 percent affordable 18 housing units, or for larger developments that exceed 30 percent affordable housing units. 19 20 STEP 8. a. The citizens and jurisdictions of King County are committed to 21 maintaining a permanent Rural Area. The GMPC or its successor shall review all Urban 22 Growth Areas 10 years after the adoption and ratification of Phase 11 Amendments to the 23 Countywide Planning Policies. The review shall be conducted utilizing monitoring reports 24 and benchmark evaluation. As a result of this review the GMPC or its successor may 25 recommend to the Metropolitan King County Council amendments to the Urban Growth 26 Area. Alternatively, King County may initiate consideration of Urban Growth Area 27 amendments. Amendments shall be based on an evaluation of the following factors: 28 -- the criteria in policies LU-26 and LU-27 29 -- the sufficiency of vacant, developable land and redevelopable land to 30 meet project needs: 31 -- the actual and projected rate of development and land consumption by 32 category of land use including both development on vacant land and redevelopment 33 projects: cppph2. 07/19/94 11 L 1 41 '1 0 4.00 1 — the capacity of apnronriat jurisdictions to vrovide infrastructure and 2 service to the Urban Growth Areas: 3 -- the actual and prt?js&tedl puss of jurisdictions in meti_nz their 4 adopted 20=y ar Foals.and'targets of number of households and employees per acre: 5 -- the actual and proj,('&tedl rate of Population and employment frowth 6 compared to adopted 24-vear_Eoals-and tareet ranees._aad compared to revised projections 7 from the Washington Slate office of financial management; a -- the actual and projected trend of economic development and 9 affordable housing indicators. as reported annually through the add monitoring and 10 benchmarks program. 11 -- indicators of environmental conditions. such as air Vality, water 12 quality, wildlife habitat. and others, 13 b. The Urban Growth Areas of the following cities which are in dispute as of 14 May 25, 1994 and illustrated on the attached maps. are now acknowledged as Joint 15 Planning Areas (See Appendix 1). By December 31_ 1995. King County the cities , 16 citizens and property owners will have completed a planning process to determine land 17 uses and the Urban Growth Area for each-city. The King County Executive will 18 recommend amendments to the Urban Growth Area for each city for adoption by the 19 Metropolitan King Count` Council. The Urban Growth Area for each city will be 20 amended in a separate Council ordinance. These amendments are not subject to 21 ratification under this policy. 22 Redmond (map #1) - 15 acres 23 Issaquah (map #2) - 100 acres 24 Renton (map #3) - 238 acres 25 North Bend (map #4) - 480 acres 26 . Black Diamond (map #5 titled: Black Diamond Urban Growth Area/Open 27 Space) - maximum 3.000 acres . 28 Snoqualmie (map #6 area labeled Joint Planning Area: the time frame for 29 completion of joint planning shall be that identified in the agreement between City of 30 Snoqualmie. King County and Snoqualmie Rim Associates rrtigardine Snoqualmie's futur, 31 annexation of property on the Lake Alice Plateau.) 32 c. In the 1994 King County Comprehensive Plan, the King County Executive max 33 propose for adoption by the Metropolitan King County Council minor technical changes. cppph2• 07/19/94 12 I_ 4. 4 pot to engeed 300 awes._ to the Urban Growth Area recommended by the GMPCin the 2 Countywide Planning Policies. These minor technical changes arc not subjmt to . 3 ratification under policy FW-l. .4 . STEP 9. Amendments to the CQurtiywide Planning Policies may be developed by 5 the GMPC or its successor_ or by the Metropolitan..King County Council. as provided in 6 this policy. Amendments to the Countywide Planning Pol_icie .not. including amendment 7 to the Urban Growth Area pursuant_to Step 7 aid 8 b;3t d< above_shall be subject to 8 ratification by at least thirty percent of the city and county governments representing 9 seventy percent of the.population in King County. Adoption and ratification of this • 1 o policy shall constitute an amendment to the May 27. 1992 interlocal agreement among 13, King County.the City of Seattle. and the suburban cities and towns in King County for tt 12 Growth Management Planning Council of King County. 13 FW-2. Countywide Planning Policies are effective after King County adoption an 14 city ratification for the purposes of updating comprehensive plans, and providing a policy 15 framework for other governmental actions of all jurisdictions. Significant planning 16 options will be precluded if interim actions are not taken to assure capacity and direct 17 growth in the Urban area, and to protect the Rural area from the impacts of growth. Th 18 following interim actions will be taken by all jurisdictions no later than one month after ratification. 20 a. King County shall adopt interim rural zoning consistent with the 21 designation of rural for the "new" Rural area adopted through the Countywide Planning Policies to ensure rural character is not threatened by additional subdivision activity. 2 3 b. All jurisdictions in the Urban area will adopt interim minimum density 24 ordinances and revie . and. where appropriate, remove regulatory barriers to accessory 25 dwelling units and manufactured homes on individual lots, to ensure that urban land is 26 used efficiently. • 27 (( i e shall rid ►he_ sti r 28 )) 29 FW-3. The final adopted household and emplpyment target ranges shall be 30 monitored by Metropolitan King County annually with adjustments made by the GMPC c 31 its successor organization every six years utilizing the process established by FW-1. Step 32 .6. 33 I. CRITICAL AREAS cppple. 07/19/94 13 11446 too 1 Most jurisdictions in King County have sensitive areas ordinances in place or 2 under development. These regulations are tailored to the specific needs of each 3 jurisdiction and are nor likely to be modified based on another jurisdiction's regulations. 4 It is important.to promote regional policies that do not erode existing regulations while 5 providing guidance for achieving consistency and compatibility among them. 6 A. Overall Environmental Protection 7 FW-((3))4. All jurisdictions shall protect and enhance the natural ecosystems 8 through comprehensive plans and policies, and develop regulations that reflect natural co 9 straints and protect sensitive features. Land use and development shall be regulated in a 1 o manner which respects fish and wildlife habitat in conjunction with natural features and 11 functions, including air and water quality. Natural resources and the built environment 12 shall be managed to protect, improve and sustain environmental quality while minimizing 13 public and private costs. 14 FW-((4))5. Puget Sound, floodplains, rivers, streams and other water resources shall be managed for multiple beneficial uses including flood and erosion hazard reduc- 16 iron, fish and wildlife habitat, agriculture, open space, water supply, and hydropower. 17 Use of water resources for one purpose shall, to the fullest extent possible, preserve and 18 promote opportunities for other uses. 19 B. Wetlands Protection 2 0 CA-1 . All jurisdictions shall use as minimum standards, the 1989 Federal Manu2 21 tor Identifying and Delineating Jurisdictional Wetlands and reference the 1989 manual in 22 their wetlands protection ordinances. 23 CA-2. In the long term. all jurisdictions shall work to establish a single 24 countywide classification system for wetlands. 25 CA-3. Within each basin, jurisdictions shall formulate their regulations and other 26 non-regulatory methods to accomplish the following: protection of wetlands; assure 27 no-net-loss of wetland functions; and an increase of the quantity and.quality of the 28 wetlands. The top class wetlands shall be untouched. 29 CA-4. Implementation of wetland mitigation should be flexible enough to allow 30 for protection of systems or corridors of connected wetlands. A tradeoff of small, isolat 31 wetlands in exchange for a larger connected wetland system can achieve greater resource 32 ,protection and reduce isolation and fragmentation of wetland habitat. 33 C. Aquifers cppph2. 07/19/94 14 i1446 1 Currently,'there ore five Ground Water Management Plans (ftenderway)) &jag 2 .argnairdin King County: Redmond, Issaquah, East King County, South King County, an 3 Vashon. Most. but not alL intnortanLOnuifers are contained within these areas. The sta 4. • Department of Ecology has designated Seattle-King County Department of Public Health 5 as the lead agency. Each plan is prepared in conjunction with an advisory committee wi 6 representatives from suburban cities, water utilities businesses, private well owners, 7 environmental groups, and state agencies. The plans will.identify aquifer recharge areas 8 and propose strategies for protection of Aquifers ((grouter)) through preservation an 9 protection of tro:indwater ((the ))• focal governments are required to adopt or 1 o amend regulations. ordinances. and/or programs in order to implement the plans followir 11 certification by Ecology in accordance with WAC 173-100-120. 12 CA-5. All jurisdictions shall adopt policies ((fegttl!etions)) to protect the quality 13 and quantity of groundwater where appropriate: 14 a. Jurisdictions that are included in Ground Water Management Plans shall 15 support the development. adoption, and implementation of the Plans; and 16 b. The Seattle-King County Department of Public Health and affected ;? turisdictions shall develop countywide policies outlining best management practices withir 18 aquifer recharge areas to protect public health; and 19 c. King County and _groundwater purveyors including cities. special purpose 20 districts, and others should jointly: 21. I . Prepare groundwater recharge area maps using common criteria and 22 incorporating information generated by Ground Water Management Plans and purveyor 23 studies: 24. 2. Develop a process by which land use jurisdictions will review. conct 25 with, and implement, as appropriate, purveyor Wellhead Protection Programs required b 26 the Federal Sate Drinking Water Act: 27 3. Determine which portions of mapped recharge areas and Wellhead 28 Protection Areas should be designated as critical: and 29 4. Update critical areas maps as new information about recharge areas 30 and Wellhead Protection Areas becomes available. 31 CA-6. Land use actions should take into account the potential impacts on aquifer 32 . determined to serve as water supplies. The deletion and degradation of aquifers needed 33 for potable water supplies should be avoided or mitigated: otherwise a proven. feasible cppph2• 07/19/94 15 j1446 1 . - f 1 replacement source of water suvnly should be planned and developedio eomnensate for 2 potential lost supplies. 3 D. Fish and Wildlife Habitat 4 CA-((6))7. . Adjacent jurisdictions shall identify•and protect habitat networks that 5 are aligned at jurisdictional boundaries. Networks shall link large protected or significan 6 blocks of habitat within and between jurisdictions to achieve a continuous countywide 7 network. These networks shall be mapped and displayed in comprehensive plans. 8 CA-((())$. All jurisdictions shall identify critical fish and wildlife habitats and 9 species and develop regulations that: 1 o a. Promote their protection and proper management; and 11 b. Integrate native plant communities and wildlife with other land uses when 12 possible. 13 CA-((8))9. Natural drainage systems including associated riparian, and shoreline 14 habitat shall be maintained and enhanced to protect water quality, reduce public costs, 15 protect fish and wildlife habitat, and prevent environmental degradation. Jurisdictions 16 within shared basins shall coordinate regulations to manage basins and natural drainage 17 systems which include provisions to: 18 a. Protect the natural hydraulic and ecological functions of drainage systems 19 maintain and enhance fish and wildlife habitat, and restore and maintain those natural 20 functions: 21 b. Control peak runoff rate and quantity of discharges from new developmei 22 to approximate pre-development rates; and 23 c Preserve and protect resources and beneficial functions and values throug 24 maintenance of stable channels, adequate low flows, and reduction of future storm flows, 25 erosion. and sedimentation. 26 CA-((9))1Q. .Jurisdictions shall maintain or enhance water quality through control 27 of runoff and best management practices to maintain natural aquatic communities and 28 beneficial uses. 29 CA-((-l-A))l I. The Washington State Departments of Fisheries and Wildlife and th 30 Indian Tribes both manage fish and wildlife resources. However, local governments have 31 authority for land use regulation. Jurisdictions shall coordinate land use planning and 32 management of fish and wildlife resources with affected state agencies and the federally 33 recognized Tribes. cppph'-. 07/19/94 16 110,04 Noe* • E. Frequently Flooded Areas 2 The State adopted comprehensive flood legislation in 1991 (Senate Bill 5411) that 3 makes the GMA requirement for coordination and consistency on flood hazard regulation 4 much more:explicit. According to.the new legislation, counties are to develop flood 5 hazard control management plans with the full participation of jurisdictions within the 6 planning areas. Once adopted by the county, cities within flood hazard planning areas 7 must comply with the management plan. The (00 )) Countywide Flood Hazard 8 Reduction Plan (( fj )) mil reviewed by affected jurisdictions ( arr 9 • ))'and adopted by 10 the Kine Country C'nuncil on'Novt,mher 15 `1993 0rrlinance<11112). 11 CA-((-14))12. The cities and the County should closely plan and coordinate 12 implementation of their flood hazard reduction activities within the major river)asins (th 13 Snoqualmie. Skykomish. Sammamish, Cedar. Green. and White). ((Ailieriselietiens 14 b 15 C 16 f 4 Pl Regulatiens ..hall:: b 17 a. Comprehensive plan policies. regulations. and programs of jurisdictions i 18 any of the six major river basins should be consistent with the King County Flood Hazar 19 Reduction Plan (FHRP) Policies. 20 b. Each jurisdictions policies. regulations. and prt2Qrams should effectively 21 prevent new development and other actions from causing significant adverse impacts on 22 major nver flooding, erosion, and natural resources outside their jurisdiction. 23 0 24 C 25 26 ; 27 28 F. Geologic Hazard Areas 29 CA-((-1-2))2. All jurisdictions shall regulate development on certain lands to 30 protect public health, property, important ecological and hydrogeologic functions, and 31 environmental quality, and to reduce public costs. The natural features of these lands 32 , include: 33 a. Slopes with a grade greater than 40%; cppph2. 07n 9/94 17 4 6 1 b. Severe landslide hazard areas; 2 c. Erosion hazard areas; 3 d. Mine hazard areas.; and 4 • e. Seismic hazards. • . 5 Regulations shall include, at a minimum, provisions for vegetation retention, 6 seasonal clearing and grading limits, setbacks, and drainage and erosion controls. 7 G. Air and Water Quality 8 CA-((43))14. All jurisdictions, in coordination with the Puget Sound Air Pollutiot 9 Control Agency and the Puget Sound Regional Council, shall develop policies, 10 methodologies and standards that promote regional air quality, consistent with the 11 Countywide Policy Plan. 12 CA-((44))b. All jurisdictions shall implement the Puget Sound Water Quality 13 Management Plan to restore and protect the biological health and diversity of the Puget, 14 Sound Basin. 15 H. Implementation 16 CA-((-1--5))16. King County shall establish a technical committee by January 1Q95 17 to facilitate environmental protection which is to include representatives of the county, tht 18 cities. the federally recognized Tribes, business community, environmental community, 19 public utilities. special districts, and interested citizens. The committee will serve as a 20 depository of regulations and policies adopted by jurisdictions in King County. 21 (( , t)) The committee shall 22 ((prepare a report by December 1993 which addresscg)) evaluate and comment upon new 23 development regulations proposed by jurisdictions pursuant to FW-3, CA-1 through 15, 24 through 5 In reviewing the proposed regulations, the technical committee shall 25 consider the consistency and compatibility of regulations and designations, and cumulativ, 26 and lon_g-term impacts. (( o 27 b 28 {hc 1urtsdtcttons.)) 29 The committee shall also recommend environmental benchmarks. 30 II. LAND USE PATTERN 31 A. Resource Lands: Agricultural, Forestry, and Mineral 32 The protection and management of resource lands in King County is a regional 33 concern and a major objective of the Countywide Planning Policies. The vast majority o, cppph2. 07/19/94 18 114ib 1 • resource lands are located in unincorporated King County. These areas were identified 2 and protected under the 1985 King County Comprehensive Plan and subsequent 3 community plans and regulations. 4 FW-((3)). . The land use pattern. for the County shall protect the natural 5 environment by reducing the consumption of land and concentrating development. Urban 6 Growth Areas, Rural Areas, and Resource Lands shall be designated and the necessary 7 implementing regulations adopted. This includes Countywide establishment of a p 8 planning boundary for the Urban Growth Area. Local jurisdictions shall establish these 9 land use designations, based on the Countywide Planning Policiesvhich''are tq use l o framework for the>ado tism of the<'I294 Mc n ring•�ntvComvrclicristv+o Play. 11 LU-1. Agricultural and forest lands are protected primarily for their long-term 12 productive resource value. However, these lands also provide secondary benefits such as 13 open space, scenic views and wildlife habitat. All jurisdictions should encourage 14 utilization of natural resources through methods that minimize the impacts on these 1 j secondary benefits. Resource lands also contain an abundance of critical areas that shall 16 be protected in accordance with adopted State and local regulations. 17 LU-2. All jurisdictions shall protect existing resource lands within their is boundaries that have long-term commercial significance for resource production. Any 19 designated agncultural and forestry lands shall not be considered for urban development. 20 Jurisdictions are required to enact a program authorizing the transfer or purchase of 21 development rights for designated forest or agricultural areas within Urban Growth Areas. 22 At the request of any city. King County will work to reinstate the King County Purchase 23 of Development Rights Program and/or establish an interjurisdictional transfer of 2 4 development rights program to protect these resource lands in accordance with the GMA. 25 LU-3. Existing mineral extractive and processing operations or designated sites 26 may be annexed or incorporated to a city only if there are policies and regulations in plac 27 to protect the long term viability for continued operation and ensure adequate reclamation 28 and enhancement of the site once operation ceases. 29 LU-4. All jurisdictions shall encourage compatible land uses adjacent to natural 30 resource areas which support utilization of the resource and minimize conflicts among 31 uses. Each jurisdiction is responsible for implementing the plat and permit notification 32 ,requirements for properties within 300 feet of the resource land, as specified in RCW 33 36.70A as amended. Jurisdictions will consider an increased distance for notification and cppph2. 07/19/94 19 4 114 6 *is 1 notification to titles to property within or adjacent to the resource lands. 2 LU-5. All jurisdictions shall require mineral extraction and processing operation: 3 and agricultural practices to implement best management practices to reduce 4 • environmental impacts and mitigate any unavoidable impacts. 5 B. Rural Areas 6 The vast majority of rural areas are located in unincorporated King County. The 7 areas were identified and regulated through the 1985 King County Comprehensive Plan 8 and subsequent community plans and regulations. While counties are the jurisdictions 9 specified by the GMA as responsible for designating and regulating rural areas through 1 o their comprehensive plans, the protection of King County's rural area is a regional issue 11 and a fundamental objective of the Countywide Planning Policies. 12 FW-((6))7. Urban Growth Areas, Rural Areas, and Resource Lands shall be 13 designated and the necessary implementing regulations adopted. This includes 14 Countywide establishment of an Urban Growth Area. Local jurisdictions shall establish 15 these land use designations, based on the Countywide Planning Policies. 16 FW-((q))8. All jurisdictions acknowledge that rural areas provide an overall , benefit for all residents of King County. Strategies to fund infrastructure and services in 1 s rural areas may be needed to support a defined rural level of service. Towns and cities 19 the rural areas play an important role as ((keel)) trade and community centers. 20 FW-9. A fundamental component of the countywide planning strategy is the 21 maintenance of the traditional character of the Rural Area with its mix of forests. farms, 22 high-quality natural environment, rural cities, unincorporated rural centers, and variety o 23 lcw -density residential uses. The basic elements of this rural character are: 24 I a NATURAL FEATURES .... such as water bodies and significant 25 wetlands, scenic resources and habitat areas should be afforded long-term protection, 26 minimizing long-term environmental d-gradation. and enhancing environmental quality 27 where previous degradation has occurred. 28 b. RESOURCE-BASED INDUSTRIES .... Commercial and non-commerci; 29 farming. forestry, primary forest products manufacturing, mining and fisheries activities 30 shall be encouraged to continue and to expand as possible; 31 c. RURAL TOWNS .... Valued attributes of small towns such as: public 32 ,safety: historical continuity: small, independent business: and local availability of goods 33 and services shall be encouraged to continue. cppph22. 07/19/94 20 1 d. RURAL INFRASTRUCTURE AND SERVICES ,.,. Rural residents 2 outside cities should anticipate lower levels of public services and infrastructure than those 3 available in urban areas, maximizing self-sufficiency and independence. 4 e. OPEN SPACE SYSTEM z,.. Significant components of King County's 5 Open Space System are found in Rural Areas. Trail corridors, habitat networks. 6 recreational areas and scenic resources should be linked wherever possible to complete the 7 system. Active recreational facilities shall be rural in character. Where a traditional 8 landscape of fields cleared for agricultural purposes exists, new development should be 9 clustered at the edges of fields to minimize the consumption of agricultural land and 10 possible conflicts with current or future farming activity. 11 f. RURAL HOUSING .... The Rural Areas shall offer important alternative 12 and qualitative housing choices but shall not be considered a quantitatively significant part 13 of the county's residential growth capacity. 14 g. RURAL ECONOMY.... The Rural Areas make a unique contribution to 15 King County's economy. In addition to farming, fisheries and forestry. cottage industries 16 shall be recognized as making a significant economic contribution in Rural Areas, and 17 should be encouraged. 18 h. CITIES....Rural cities shall encourage, where appropriate, business 19 opportunities which support the full range of rural activities occurring in their adjacent 2 o Rural Areas, including support services for agriculture and forestry. Cities should also 21 provide a place for shopping, education, social services and other community functions at 22 a scale consistent with the maintenance of rural character as well as the cities' household 2 3 and employment target ranges. 24 FW-l0. To achieve and maintain rural character, King County. and the cities, 25 as appropriate, shall use a range of tools including, at a minimum: land use designations. 2 6 development regulations, level of service standards (particularly for infrastructure), and 27 incentives. 2 8 LU-6. Through the Countywide Planning Policy process, King County, with 29 the cooperation of the cities, shall be responsible for designating rural areas consistent 3 o with GMA. In designating long term rural areas, King County shall foster better use of 31 limited public funds by allowing service providers to establish distinctly rural facility and 3 2 service standards._ 3 3 LU-7. Designated rural areas are considered to be permanent and shall not be cppph2. 07/19/94:amend 8/15/94 21 1 4 4 6 redesignated to an Urban Growth Area until reviewed pursuant to the growth 2 jvlanaeement Act (RCW 36.79A.130 (311 and policy FW-1. Future growth should be 3 accommodated to the maximum extent feasible by efficient use of existing urban land • 4 . within the Urban Growth.Area. Annexation of rural areas to cities shall be prohibited. 5 When annexation of rural areas is necessary to link two urban areas, that intervening rura 6 area shall be designated as permanent urban separator at low rural densities._ 7 • • LU-8. Retention of resource-based uses.and conservation of natural resource lane 8 are impQ It to maintaining the traditional character. environmental functions and values 9 the Rural Area. King County shall identify appropriate districts within the Rural Area whe7 10 farming and forestry are to be encouraged and expanded. These districts shall be designate 11 by December 31. 1995. Areas to be considered should include: 12 a. Large blocks of land. either identified by King County or Proposed t 13 the property owners. with resource land characteristics,or agriculture or forestry productic 14 potential; 15 h. Land enrolled in the current use assessmentprQgram as farm and agr 16 cultural land or timber land under RCW 84.34 or enrolled for tax purposes as timber lar 17 under RCW 84.33; 18 C. Land in proximity to designated Agriculture and Forest Production Di 19 tracts, offering mutual buffering benefits and low potential for conflicts with adjacent use 20 and 21 d. Land with valuable environmental features such as wildlife habitz 22 ground water recharge. salmonid streams. or high-value wetlands. 23 Ltt-Q Permitted land uses within designated Rural Area farming and forestry distric 24 should be limited to residences at very low densities and farming or forestry-related use 25 institutional uses or public facilities should not be permitted except for the siting of utili 26 lines where no feasible alternative exists and the siting of K-12 public schools and K- 27 public school facilities in conjunction with K-I2 Public Schools. Development of adjace 28 lands should be conditioned to minimize land use conflicts and•conversion pressures up( 29 these districts. 30 LU-10. The Rural Area shall have low densities which can be sustained by mining 31 infrastructure improvements. such as septic systems and rural roads. King County. citi 32 .adjacent to Rural Areas. and other agencies providing services to Rural Areas. shall adc 33 standards for facilities and services in Rural Areas that protect basic public health and safet cppph2. 07/19/94 22 114 t) and enhance the environment. but urban facilities and services should not be provided t -_-•l•-•-- roads Ind other infrastructure improvements may only be extende 2 3 through rural areas to serve existing urban areas. 4 ((RU 3))LU11. cornnrehenmive plans covering nearby Urban Areas shall consider t>' . 5 potential impacts of urban development upon the adjacent R talA ea. Development in Urba 6 Arias shall not significantly incrrase_peak flows or pollution in Rural Area streams. Urban 7 ....ld of cause run l roads to nnvraded to urban standards. Where g 8 rural arterial must be upgraded to accommodate urban-go:Mai traffic— it should include fe 9 tures such as screening and limited access within the Rural Area to lessen the road's impa( 10 on surrounding rural lands. including pressure to convert them to hieher-intensity use 11 Funding for such improvements should be primarily the responsibility of the benefitin 12 jurisdiction. 13 LU-12. Planning for Rural Areas should comply with the following density guideline: 14 a. one home per 20 acres toprottcs forest lands when designated in accot 1 dance with Policy LU-8. 16 b. one home per 10 acres to protect lands for small-scale farming whe 17 designated in accordance with Policy LU-8; 18 C. one home per 10 acres is also appropriate if the predominant lot size is I 19 acres or larger and the lands are within one-Quarter of a mile of a designated Fore: 20 Production Distnct or lower-density Agricultural Production District with livestock-base 21 agriculture or a legally-approved long-term mineral resource extraction site or. the Ian( 22 contain significant environmentally constrained areas as defined by county ordinance c 2 3 federal or state law; 24 d. one home per 5 acres where the land is physically suitable and can t 25 supported by rural services. and 26 e development on existing sub-standard lots in the Rural Area shall t 27 permitted when applicable development standards. such as Board of.Health regulations fc 28 on-site sewage disposal. can be met. 29 LU-13. To maintain rural character. and to minimize the need for additional 30 infrastructure, very large lots (five acres or more) are the preferred residential 31 developmentpattern. To further thegoals of rural protection. clusterine of development 32 that will sustain rural land uses. require only rural levels of service and be designed, 33 scaled and sited to be consistent with Rural Area character may be required cppph2. 07/19/94 23 j11Lti • 1 a. where it would not result in a grater number of dwelling units than woul 2 be constructed under a conventional lotting pattern unless either: 3 1, a substantial_dedication of land to King Countvt Qpen Space Systen 4 ' is provided and the i Pacts of the additional dwelling units are mitred: 5 2. permanent protection. substantially greater than that attainable throu1 6 existing regulations_ is secured for a significant natural resoutrce• or 7 3. substantial farming or forestry lands would be permanently protectec 8 - from conversion to non-resource based uses. 9 b. where clustering of development would: 3.0 1. • provide greater protection for natural resources or environmentally 11 sensitive features: 12 2. reduce the consumption of agricultural or forestry lands for residenti 13 purposes: or 14 3. minimize potential conflicts between residential and resource-based 15 activities. 16 LU-14. King County may allow transfer of density from Rural Area propert 17 to other Rural or Urban Area properties in.order to (1) secure a substantial dedication of si is nificant land to the King County Open Space System: (2) provide permanent protection whi 19 is greater than that available through existing regulation to a significant natural resource: 20 encourage retention of resource-based uses in the Rural Area. The county shall devel 21 a mechanism to accomplish these objectives and provide that: 22 a. lands dedicated are first determined to be suitable for inclusion within t 23 King County Open Space System; 24 b. the protected natural resource is first determined to be of significance 25 King County citizens and the protection afforded is materially superior to that provided 26 existing regulations; 27 C. the resulting development is located in proximity to the lands to be de, 28 cated to public ownership or where it can otherwise be shown that the residents of this dev 29 opment will share in an overriding public benefit to be derived from the_preservation of t 30 dedicated lands or the protection of the natural resource: 31 d. the resulting development within the Rural Area maintains rural charactc 32 . and 33 e. there shall be no net increase in density within the Rural Area as a res_ cppph2. 07/19/94 24 A i1446 of this density transfer. 2 LU-15. Rural Areas should retain a_high p=Qpotion of undisturbed soils to maint< 3 ground water recharge_ high water _quality and liver and _stream base flows essential 4 . navigation. recreation and the survival of wildlifeiand fish, The long-term intsgri y of Ru 5 Area ecosystems should be a guiding principle in establishing the location and intensity 6 •end aces and public facilities in Rural Areac the operating standards for resource-bas 7 activities, and rural facility standards. 8 j,U-l6. Rural development standards should be designed to protect the natural en. 9 ronment. The tools to achieve this include: seasonal and maximum clearing limi a.0 impervious surface limits: surface water management standards that emphasize prejervati 11 of natural drainage systems and water quality, ground water rechar a and best mnnaeerm 12 practices for resource-based activities, 13 L,U-17, Rural Areas shall be recognized as significant for the recharge and store 14 of groundwater and as areas necessary for the maintenance of base flows in rivers and natu s levels of lakes and wetlands. Measures to protect these areas shall include: 16 g. A rural section within the King County Surface Water Design Mani 17 requiring runoff be infiltrated except where potential groundwater contamination cannot 18 prevented by pollution source controls and stormwater pretreatment. and 19 b. infiltration as the preferred method of volume control. with other methc 20 allowable only after infiltration has been ruled out for technical reasons. 21 LU-18. King County's Comprehensive Plan shall include policies to preset 22 opportunities for mining and to assure extractive industries maintain environmental qual 23 and minimize impacts to adiacent land uses. The goal shall be to facilitate the efficit 24 utilization of valuable mineral, oil and gas deposits when consistent with maintaini 25 environmental quality and minimizing impacts. 26 LU- 19. Rural level standards for streets should be refined to minimize clearing a 27 °grading. and avoid conflicts with the natural landscape, Pavement width should be no wic 28 than needed to meet safety considerations and accommodate designated bigycle/pedestri 29 routes. 30 LU-20. Standards for rural water service. to be developed through the rural desi 31 manual, should assure adequate quality and quantity for domestic supply consistent with 1 32 rural residential densities and existing infrastructure commitments, 33 LU-21, Regional public facilities which directly serve the public shall be discourag cppph2. 07/19/94 25 11. 446 from locating in rural areas. 2 LU-22, King County should evaluate additional ways that _small-scale farming a 3 forestry,and land and watershed stewardship can be encouraged th_rouah landowner incenti 4 programs and community-based education. This should include: 5 a. creating opDon=esand incentives for voluntary cootxrative ma-nArsme 6 of woodlots and open space that is currently in separate ownerships; 7 b. providing technical assistance and information to landowner groups a 8 community associations seeking to implement stewardship. habitat restoration and manag 9 ment plans; 1 o c. providing outreach and assistance to small landowners wishing to participt 11 in open space tax incentive programs; 12 d. ongoing evaluation of existing tax incentive program. including. t 13 County's Public Benefit Rating System and the timber and agricultural current use assessme 14 programs. 20 ensure they meet the needs of rural character preservation; e. implementation of "right to farm" and "right to forestry" ordinances; 16 f. development of expedited permit review_processes and/or permit exemptio 17 for activities complying with cooperatively developed stewardship. habitat restoration al 1 s resource management plans that include "best management practices". 19 g. cooperation with State and Tribal Agencies in expediting regulatory revie 20 and technical assistance to cooperating landowners, 21 ((i r i Desig-nai z'isl areas it hu , i ..., cn;itii-�-=�iiich 22 , 23 ,))_ 24 (( 25 26 27 28 29 )) 30 land _ Mi _ _ 31 32 , 33 , cppph2• 07/19/94 26 11446 .6 • • • . . 2 • 3 LU-((49))23. Rural areas designated by King County shall remain rural. 4. . Additional.rural areas shall be designated by King County through adoption of•a land use 5 map authorized by the Growth Management Planning Council. These additional areas 6 meet at least one of the following criteria: 7 a. Opportunities exist for small scale farming and forestry which do not 8 qualify for resource land designation; 9 b. The rural designation serves as a buffer for designated resource lands or 3.0 sensitive areas; 11 c. Significant environmental constraints make the area generally unsuitable ff 12 intensive urban development; 13 d. Major physical barriers exist to providing urban services at reasonable 14 cost: 15 e. The area is contiguous to other designated rural areas, resource areas or 16 sensitive areas; 17 f. The area has outstanding scenic, ,historic, and/or aesthetic value that can 18 best be protected by rural land uses and densities; and 19 g. The area has limited public services, extension of full services is not 20 planned. and infill at higher densities is not feasible or necessary to meet regional goals. 21 Crtcra .cpeciliecl in LU-((49)).,2(g) permits the redesignation of urban lands in 22 King Cowin to rural. The.Ne areas have not received a full range of services, such as 23 Ac tcr.', and are developed al cle•nsities which are too low to support cost-effective 24 provision of all urban services. The inclusion of these new rural areas will carry out 25 regional policies by.locusing new development to urban areas that are planned to havef 26 urban services. 27 LU-((4-1-)).4. Low-density urban areas meeting the criteria of LU-((-18))2(g) 28 ((s# 1)) may be redesignated rural and zoned for rural residential densities. Legally 29 created existing lots within the rural area are legal building sites as authorized in the Kir 30 County Code. 31 ((I i Imo' 4-T2,--T-e - ral ch'aract the _ efi fo-_.. 32 0 , 33 c cppph2. 07/19/94 27 llL* n 1 2 be e _ scent with r rel eh..raeter )) 3 LU-25. King County, in collaboration with affected governments, agencies and 4 • citizens.shall prepare the following products: • 5 a. A manual on rural infrastructure demon (including an examination of alternati 6 sewage treatment technologies), fire/wildfire protection, and service standards; 7 b. Recommended revisions to King County's land development regulations 8 address issues such as incentives for reconsolidation of nonconforming and unbuildabie to 9 application of current regulations if discretionary extensions of preliminary plat approvals 1 o allowed, and subdivision site design to minimize conflict with nearby farming and forest 11 activities; 12 c. A strategy to persuade the banking industry and its regulators to revise 13 lending criteria to remove obstacles to affordable housing on large lots, and to invest in 14 environmentally sound land management practices: and 15 d. A strategy to persuade the federal and state governments to devise domes 16 water quality standards and monitoring requirements that protect the environment and pub 17 health at a reasonable cost so as to avoid financial pressure to convert Rural Areas to hjgt 18 densities. 19 ((l_.0 13 King County. cities that are ad.j.cent to or are surrounded by rural 20 dcsii.iinated areas. and other agencies that provide services to rural areas shall form a 21 22 .)) 23 C. Urban Areas 24 The following policies e.ctabli.ch an Urban Growth Area (UGA) and methods to 25 phase development within this area in order to bring certainty to long-term planning and 26 development within .the counn'. The Urban Growth Area is a permanent designation. 27 .Lund outside the Urban Growth Area is designated,for permanent rural and resource 28 uses, except for the cities in the rural area. Countywide policies on rural and resource 29 areas are found in Chapter 71A, Resource Lands, and Chapter IIIB, Rural Areas. 30 The cupac,ry in the Urban Growth Area for growth, based on adopted plans and 31 regulations, meerc ((elf)) the 20-year minimum requirement of the GMA according t 32 the current population.forecasts. In the future, all urban growth is to be accommodated 33 within permanent urban areas by increasing densities. Phasing is to occur within the cppph2. 07/19/94 28 44 6 ,> 1 Urban Growth Area to ensure that services are provided as growth occurs. All cities are 2 to be within the Urban Growth Area. Cities in the rural area are to be UGA islands. 3 FW-((8)111. The land use pattern for King County shall protect the natural 4 environment by reducing the consumption of land and concentrating development. An 5 Urban Growth Area, Rural Areas, and Resource Lands shall be designated and the 6 necesvry implementing regulations adopted. This includes countywide establishment of a 7 boundary for the Urban Growth Area. Local jurisdictions shall make land use decisions 8 based on the Countywide Planning Policies. 9 FW-((9))12. The Urban Growth Area shall provide enough land to accommodate 10 future urban development. Policies to phase the provision of urban services and to ensure 11 efficient use of the growth capacity within the Urban Growth Area shall be instituted. 12 1. Urban Growth Area 13 The GMA requires King County to designate an Urban Growth Area (UGA) in 14 consultation with cities. The Countywide Planning Policies must establish an Urban 15 Growth Area that contains enough urban land to accommodate at least 20 years of new 16 population and employment growth. Me GMA stares: "based upon the population 17 forecast made for the counry by the Office of Financial Management, the Urban Growth 18 Areas in the county shall include areas and densities sufficient to permit urban growth that 19 is projected to occur in the counry for the succeeding twenty-year period. Each Urban 2 0 Growth Area shall permit urban densities and shall include greenbelt and open space 21 areas. " A UGA map is attached as Appendix 1, which guides the adoption of the 1994 22 Metropolitan Kino County Comprehensive Plan. 2 3 LU-(( ))26. The lands within ((the)) Urban Growth Areas (UGA) shall be ................ 2 4 characterized by urban development. The UGA shall accommodate ((at least)) the 20-year 25 projection of ((population)) household and employment growth with a full range of phased 2 6 urban governmental services. The Countywide Planning Policies shall establish the Urban 2 7 Growth Area based on the following criteria: 2 8 a. Include all lands within existing cities, including cities in the rural area and 2 9 their designated expansion areas; 3 0 b. The GMPC recognizes that the Bear Creek Master Plan Developments 31 (MPDs) are subject to an ongoing review process under the adopted Bear Creek 3 2 Community Plan and recognizes these properties as urban under these Countywide 3 3 Planning Policies. If the applications necessary to implement the MPDs are denied by cppph2. 07/19/94:amend 8/15/94 29 j. 141 `f � King County or not pursued by the applicant(s), then the property subject to the MPD 2 shall be redesignated rural pursuant to the Bear Creek Community Plan. Nothing in these 3 . Planning Policies shall limit the continued review and implementation through existing a. • applications, capital improvements appropriations or other•approvals of these two MPDs • 5 as new communities under the Growth Management Act. 6 c. Not include rural land or unincorporated agricultural, or forestry lands 7 designated through the Countywide Planning Policies plan process; 8 . d. Include only areas already characterized by urban development which can 9 be efficiently and cost effectively served by roads, water, sanitary sewer and storm 10 drainage, schools and other urban governmental services within the next 20 years; 11 e. Do not extend beyond natural boundaries, such as watersheds, which 12 impede provision of urban services; 13 f. Respect topographical features which form a natural edge such as rivers 14 and ridge lines; and 15 g. Include only areas which are sufficiently free of environmental constraints 16 to be able to support urban growth without major environmental impacts unless such area 17 are designated as an urban separator by interlocal agreement between jurisdictions. 18 LU-((+.75))27. Urban separators are low density areas or areas of little developmer 19 (ia+ - -be)) within the Urban Growth Area. Urban separators shall be defined as 20 permanent low density lands which protect adjacent resource lands, rural areas, and 21 environmentally sensitive areas and create open space corridors within and between urban 22 areas which provide environmental, visual, recreational and wildlife benefits. (('These 23 +ands)) Designated urban separators shall not be redesignated in the future (in the 20 year 24 planning cycle) to other urban uses or higher densities. The maintenance of these urban 25 separators is a regional as well as a local concern. Therefore, no modifications should b 2 6 made to the development regulations governing these areas without King County review 27 pnd concurrence. 28 2. Phasing Development within the Urban Growth Area 29 Development in the urban area will be phased to promote efficient use of the land 30 add certainry in infrastructure planning, and to ensure that urban services can be provide 31 to urban development. The minimum densities required by LU-(( 4))¢¢ help ensure the 32 efficient use of the land. Phasing will further ensure coordination of infrastructure and 33 development. Urban areas in jurisdictions which do not have urban services and are no; cppph2. 07/19/94 30 114 fb r• scheduled to receive urban services within 10 years shall be subject to phasing 2 requirements. 3 LU-(06))2B. Within the Urban Growth Area, growth should be directed as. 4 follows: a) first, to:centers.and urbanized areas with existing infrastructure capacity; b) 5 second, to areas which are already urbanized such that infrastructure improvements can h 6 easily extended; and c) last, to areas requiring major infrastructure improvements. 7 LU-((4))29. All jurisdictions shall develop growth phasing plans consistent with 8 applicable capital facilities plans to maintain an urbane served with aerate public 9 facilities and services to maintain an urban area to meet at least the six year intermediate 1 o household and employment target ranges consistent with LU-67 and LU-68. (()y 11 12 )) These growth phasing plans shall be based on locally 13 adopted definitions, service levels, and financing commitments, consistent with State 14 GMA requirements. The (( )) phasing plans for cities shall no 1 extend beyond their Potential Annexation Areas. Interlocal agreements shall be develope 16 that specify the applicable minimum zoning, development standards, impact mitigation an 17 future annexation for the Potential Annexation Areas. 18 LU-((+8))30. Where urban services cannot be provided within the next 10 years, 19 jurisdictions should develop policies and regulations to: 20 a. Phase and limit development such that planning, siting, densities and 21 infrastructure decisions will support future urban development when urban services 22 become available: and 23 b. Establish a process for converting land to urban densities and uses once 24 services are available. 25 3. Joint Planning and Urban Growth Areas around Cities 26 The GMA re'jmrea each county to designate Urban Growth Areas, in consultation 27 with cities. Within the countywide Urban Growth Area, each city will identify land need 28 for its growth for the next twenty years. Although the GMA does nor explicitly equate 29 Urban Growth Areas with municipal annexation areas, the Urban Growth Areas around 30 cities may he considered potential expansion areas for cities. 31 FW-((+9))f3. Cities are the appropriate provider of local urban services to urban 32 areas either directly or by contract. Counties are the appropriate provider of most 33 countywide services. Urban services shall not be extended through the use of special cppph2. 07/19/94 31 kg, *4111110 purpose districts without the approval of the city in whose potential annexation area the 2 extension is proposed. Within the urban area, as time and conditions warrant, cities 3 should assume local urban services provided by special purpose districts. 4 • . LU-((49))31.. In collaboration with-adjacent counties and cities and King County 5 and in consultation with residential groups in affected areas, each city shall designate a 6 potential annexation area. Each potential annexation area shall be specific to each city. 7 Potential annexation areas shall not overlap. Within the potential annexation area the cit 8 shall adopt criteria for annexation, including conformance with Countywide Planning 9 Policies, and a schedule for providing urban services and facilities within the potential 1 o annexation area. This process shall ensure that unincorporated urban islands of King 11 County are not created between cities and strive to eliminate existing islands between 12 cities. 13 LU-(R8)) 2. A city may annex territory only within its designated potential 14 annexation area. All cities shall phase annexations to coincide with the ability for the ci 15 I to coordinate the provision of a full range of urban services to areas to be annexed. 16 LU-((4))33. Land within a city's potential annexation area shall be developed 17 according to that city's and King County's growth phasing plans. Undeveloped lands 18 adjacent to that city should be annexed at the time development is proposed to receive a 19 full range of urban services. Subsequent to establishing a potential annexation area, inftl 20 lands within the potential annexation area which are not adjacent or which are not 21 practical to annex shall be developed pursuant to interlocal agreements between the 22 Counts and the affected city. The interlocal agreement shall establish the type of 2 3 development allowed in the potential annexation area and standards for that development 24 so that the area is developed in a manner consistent with its future annexation potential. 25 The interlocal agreement shall specify at a minimum the applicable zoning, development 26 standards. impact mitigation, and future annexation within,the potential annexation area. 27 LU-(( ))34. Several unincorporated areas are currently considering local 28 governance options. Unincorporated urban areas that are already urbanized and are with 29 a city's potential annexation area are encouraged to annex to that city in order to receive 30 urban services. Where annexation is inappropriate, incorporation may be considered. 31 Development within the potential annexation area of one jurisdiction may have 32 impacts on adjacent jurisdictions. 33 LU-((23))35. A jurisdiction may designate a potential impact area beyond its cppph'_. 07/19/94 32 1446 • 1 potential annexation area in collaboration with adjacent jurisdictions. As part of the 2 designation process the jurisdiction shall establish-criteria for the review of development 3 proposals under consideration by other jurisdictions in the impact area. 4 The GMA has a provision granting counties the discretion to disband the Boundar 5 Review Boards after comprehensive plans and development regulations are adopted. The 6 following policy provides direction for considering whether to disband the Boundary 7 Review Board for King County. 8 LU-((44))3. Upon the adoption and ratification of the Countywide Policies, the 9 King County Council shall convene a meeting with municipal elected officials to 10 determine a process for disbanding the Washington State Boundary Review Board for 11 King County and establishing criteria to oversee municipal and special district 12 annexations, mergers, and incorporations in King County. Until the Washington State 13 Boundary Review Board for King County is disbanded, it should be governed in its 14 decisions by the interim urban growth area boundary and the adopted and ratified 15 countywide planning policies. The criteria shall include, but not be limited to: 16 a. Conformance with Countywide Planning Policies; 17 b. The ability of the annexing jurisdiction to demonstrate a capability to 18 provide urban services at standards equal to or better than the current service providers; 19 and 20 C. Annexations in a manner which discourages unincorporated islands of 21 development. 22 The GMA rrquire.s thur cin• and county comprehensive plans he coordinated and 23 ennsrstenr wan one another. Consistency is required "where there are common borders o 24 relayed regiona/ r.t.tuc•.t " (RCW 36. 70A.100). Joint planning is fundamental to all the 25 framework poi/or). 26 LU-((33))37.. All jurisdictions shall cooperate in developing comprehensive plans 27 which are consistent with those of adjacent jurisdictions and with the countywide planning 28 policies. 29 4. Cities in the Rural Area 30 The cities and unincorporated towns in'the rural areas are a significant part of 31 King County's diversiry and heritage. Cities in this category include: Black Diamond, 32 Carnation, Duvall, Enumclaw, North Bend, Snoqualmie and Skvkomish. They have an • 33 important role as local trade and community centers. These cities and towns are the cppph2. 07/19/94 33 .r 1 appropriate providers of local rural services for the community. They also contribute to 2 the variety of development patterns and housing choices within the county. As 3 municipalities, the cities are to provide urban services and be located within designated 4 . Urban Growth Areas. 'The urban services, residential densities and mix of land uses ma 5 differ from those of the large, generally western Urban Growth Area. 6 LU-(( '6))3 . In recognition that cities'in the rural area are generally not 7 contiguous to the countywide Urban Growth Area, and to protect and enhance the optior. 8 cities in rural areas provide, these cities shall be located within ((aft)) Urban Growth 9 Areas. These Urban Growth Areas generally will be islands separate from the larger 10 Urban Growth Area located in the western portion of the county. Each city in the f$ura 11 aArea and King County and the GMPC shall work cooperatively to establish an Urban 12 Growth Area for that city. 13 January 1, 1.993.)) The Urban Growth Area for cities in the Rural Area shall: 14 a. Include all lands within existing cities in the rural area; 15 b. Be sufficiently free of environmental constraints to be able to support ru: 16 city growth without major environmental impacts; 17 c. Be contiguous to city limits; 18 d. Have boundaries based on natural boundaries, such as watersheds, topo- 19 graphical features. and the edge of areas already characterized by urban development; 20 e. Be maintained in large lots at densities of one home per five acres or less 21 with mandatory clustering provisions until such time as the city annexes the area; 22 f. Be implemented through interlocal agreements among King County. the 23 cities and special purpose districts, as appropriate, to ensure that annexation is phased, 24 nearby open space is protected and development within the Urban Growth Area is 25 compatible with surrounding Rural and Resource areas; and 26 g. Not include designated Forest or Agricultural. Production District lands 27 unless the conservation of those lands and continued resource-based use, or other 28 compatible use, is assured. 29 ((LU �-t Citi th _.._ i __ hall inclu a the folio ing -L____tensti L�.. Z -- b 30 ' b• . , 31 32 ,rcinforccs the s ' , 33 cppph2. 07/19/94 34 11 `± x U • • 2 • ' 3 4 D. Urban.and Manufacturing/Industrial Centers • 5 Urban Centers are envisioned as areas of concentrated employment and housing, 6 with direct service by high capacity transit, and a wide range of other land uses such as 7 retail, recreational, public facilities, parks and open space. 8 Urban Centers are designed to 1) strengthen existing communities, 2) promote 9 housing opportunities close to employment, 3) support development of an extensive • 10 transportation system to reduce dependency on automobiles, 4) consume less land with 11 urban development, and 5) maximize the benefit of public investment in infrastructure and 12 services, 6) reduce costs of and time required for permitting, and 7) evaluate and 13 mitigate environmental impacts. 14 Manufacturing/industrial Employment Centers are key components of the regional 15 economy. These areas are characterized by a significant amount of manufacturing ((er 16 of )) industrial, and advanced technolov employment. They differ from other 17 employment areas, such as Business/Office parks (see FW 13 and LU-58-62), in that a 18 land base and the setret'ation of major non-manufacturine uses are ((ts-en)) essential 19 elements of their operation. 20 FW-((-44))14. Within the Urban Growth Area, a limited number of Urban Centel 21 which meet specific criteria established in the Countywide Planning Policies shall be local] 22 designated. Urban Centers shall be characterized by all of the following: 23 a. Clearly defined geographic boundaries; 24 b. Intensity/density of land uses sufficient to support effective rapid transit; 25 C. Pedestrian emphasis within the Center; 26 d. Emphasis on superior urban design which reflects the local community; 27 • e. Limitations on single occupancy vehicle usage during.peak hours or . 28 commute purposes; 29 f. A broad array of land uses and choices within those uses for employees Ka 30 residents; 31 g. Sufficient public open spaces and recreational opportunities; and 32 h. Uses which provide both daytime and nighttime activities in the Center. 33 FW-(( ))15. Within the Urban Growth Area, the Countywide Planning Policies cppph2. 07/19/94 • 35 shall assure the creation of a number of locally((-designated)) determined 2 Manufacturing/Industrial Centers which meet specific criteria (( 3 )). The Manufacturing/Industrial 4 Centers ((will)) shall be ((and-are)) characterized by the following: 5 a. Clearly defined geographic boundaries; 6 b. Intensity/density of land uses sufficient to support manufacturing, (OM)) 7 industrial and advanced technoloey uses; ((and)) 8 c. Reasonable access to the regional highway, rail, air and/or waterway 9 system for the movement of goods; 10 d. Provisions to discourage lame office and retail development: and 11 e. Fast-track project permitting. 12 FW-((-13))16. Urban and Manufacturing/Industrial Centers shall be complementec 13 by the land use pattern outside the centers but within the urban area. This area shall 14 include: urban residential neighborhoods, activity areas, business/office parks, and an 15 urban open space network. Within these areas, future development shall be limited in 16 scale and intensity to support the countywide land use and regional transportation plan. 17 1. Urban Centers Designation Process 18 LU-((?8))39. The location and number of Urban Centers in King County ((will 19 be)) were determined through the joint local and countywide adoption process, based on 20 the following steps: 21 a. The Countywide Planning Policies include specific criteria for Urban 22 Centers: 23 b (( _. 24 contain nn Urban Ccntcr(s).)) Jurisdictions electing to contain an Urban Center provided 25 (( )) the GMPC with a statement of commitment describing the 26 city's intent and commitment to meet the Centers' criteria defined in these policies and a 27 timetable for the required Centers Programmatic Environmental Impact Statement or 28 identification of existing environmental documentation to be used; and 29 c. The GMPC reviewed the Centers nominated ($y-Deeember--1-7-1-992.7the 30 e 31 eleeted)) by local jurisdictions consistent with Policy FW-1, and the following criteria ((E 32 )): 33 1) The Center's location in the region and its potential for promoting a cppph2. 07/19/94 36 .41.. .i L - - 1 countywide system of Urban Centers; • 2 2) The total number of centers in the county that can be realized over t 3 next twenty years, based on twenty years projected growth; 4 .' 3) •The type and level.of commitments that each jurisdiction has • 5 identified for achieving Center goals; and • 6 4) Review of other jurisdictional plans to ensure that growth focused tc 7 Centers is assured. 8 d. The GMPC confirmed the following Urban Centers: 9 Bellevue CBD 10 Federal Way CBD • 11 Kent CBD 12 Kirkland Totem Lake 13 Redmond CBD 14 Redmond Overlake 15 Renton CBD 16 Seattle CDD 17 Seattle Center • 18 First Hill/Capital Hill 19 University District 20 Northgate 21 SeaTac CBD 22 Tukwila CBD 23 2. Urban Centers Criteria 24 Urban Centers vary substantially in the number of households and jobs they 25 contain today The intent o4 the Countywide Planning Policies is to encourage the grow 26 of each Urban Center as.a unique. vibrant community that is an attractive place to live 27 and work, will suppon efficient public services including transit, and responds to local 28 needs and markets for jobs and housing. 29 Two approaches are used to set guidelines and track the growth of Urban Center 30 First. the Countywide Planning Policies establish levels of households and jobs needed t 31 achieve the benefits of an Urban Center. Some Urban Centers will reach these levels o' 32 ,the next twenty years. while for others the criteria set a path for growth over a longer 33 term and provide capacity to accommodate growth beyond the 20 year horizon. cppph2. 07/19/94 37 1146 Second.jurisdictions establish 20 year household and emoloyinoLErowth target 2 raters for each Urban Center, The target ranges reflectthe diversity of the Centers, 3 a lowing communities to envisio 1 n changes over the next 20 nears and elan for needed 4 • services. The target ranges set-a_olicy for the level of growth envisioned for.each Cer 5 that not only considers land capacity but also the timing and funding of infrastructure. 6 Reaching the target ranges will moire planning, public investment, and incentives for 7 private investments. Over time the Centers will move toward the development pattern 8 envisioned in the Countywide Planning Policies, 9 Within the County. Urban Centers are expected to account for up to one-half of 1 o employment growth and one-quarter of household growth over the next 20 years. 11 Additional capacity for household and employment growth is provided in the Urban 12 Growth Areas outside of designated Urban Centers to ensure that. Countywide. 20-year 13 growth projections will be accommodated, 3. 4 LU-((9))40. Each jurisdiction which has designated an Urban Center shall adof in its comprehensive plan a definition of the urban center which specifies the exact 1 c, geographic boundaries of the center. All Centers shall be up to 1-1/2 square miles of land. Infrastructure and services shall be planned and financed consistent with the 18 expected rate of growth For the purposes of achieving a long-range developmentpattet 19 that will provide a successful mix of uses and densities that will efficiently support high 20 capacttl transit, each ((Ira )) Center shall have planned land uses to (()e-gencd te)) 21 accommodate: 22 a A minimum of 15.000 jobs within 1/2 mile of a transit center; 23 h. At a minimum, an average of 50 employees per gross acre; and 24 c. At a minimum, an average 15 households per gross acre. 25 LlJ-4I . In order to be designated as Urban Centers,jurisdictions shall demonstr 26 both that an adeuuate supply of drinking water is available to serveprojected growth 27 within the Urban Center and that the jurisdiction is capable of concurrent service to nev. 28 development. 29 LU-((30))42. Jurisdictions which contain Urban Centers, in conjunction with 30 METRO, shall identify transit station areas and right-of-way in their comprehensive plat 31 Station areas shall be sited so that all portions of the Urban Center are within walking 32 , distance (one half mile) of a station. 33 LU-((3-1))4, . In order to reserve right-of-way and potential station areas for cppph2. 07/19/94 38 mow/ iftote • 1 high-capacity transit or transit hubs in the Urban Centers, jurisdictions shall: 2 a. Upon adoption of specific high-capacity transit alignments by METRO, 3 adopt policies to avoid development which would restrict establishment of the • 4. high-capacity transit system; • 5 b. Preserve right-of-ways controlled by the jurisdiction which are identified 6 for potential transit use; and 7 c. Provide METRO an option to acquire property owned by the jurisdiction. 8 • LU-(M))44. To encourage transit use; jurisdictions (*ell)) should establish 9 mechanisms to limit the use of SOVs for commuting purposes: such mechanisms could 10 include charge for long-term single-occupancy vehicle parking and/or ((e-limit-en)) 11 limiting the number of off-street parking spaces for each Urban Center, and establish 12 minimum and maximum parking requirements that limit the use of the single-occupant 13 vehicle and develop coordinated plans that incorporate Commuter Trip Reduction 14 guidelines. All plans for Urban Centers shall encourage bicycle travel and pedestrian 15 activity. 16 LU-((33))4.5. Jurisdictions' comprehensive plans for Urban Centers shall 17 demonstrate compliance with the Urban Centers criteria. In order to promote urban 18 growth within centers, the Urban Center plan shall establish strategies which: 19 a. Support pedestrian mobility, bicycle use and transit use; 20 b. Achieve a target housing density and mix of use; 21 c. Provide a wide range of capital improvement projects, such as street 22 improvements. Schools, parks and open space, public art and community facilities; 23 d. Emphasize superior urban design: 24 e. Emphasize historic preservation and adaptive reuse of historic places; 25 1 Include other local characteristics necessary to achieve a vital urban cente- 2 6 and 27 g. Include facilities to meet human service needs. 28 LU-((34))46. The system of urban centers shall form the land use foundation for 29 regional high capacity transit system. Urban centers should receive very high priority fc 30 the location of high-capacity transit stations and/or transit centers. (See also LU-((47))59 31 3. Incentives for Urban Centers 32 • In order to help create Urban Centers, incentives to jurisdictions to establish 33 Urban Centers, and to the community to build in Urban Centers, should be established. cppph2. 07/19/94 39 11446 „a, 1 The pmvision of high-capacity transit (HCT) is one such incentive. Others include 2 funding, and streamlined permitting. 3 LU-((33))42. Countywide financing strategies shall be developed by the GMPC• s 4 its successor. ((by July 1, 1993)) which: 5 a. Identify regional funding sources; and 6 b. Set priorities and allocate funds for urban facilities and services including 7 social and human services, and subarea planning efforts, in Urban Centers. g LU-((36))4$. Each jurisdiction electing to contain an Urban Center ((-i -sic 9 LU 28)) shall prepare a Programmatic Environmental Impact Statement (PEIS) for each 1 o proposed Center. The PEIS shall be prepared in a comprehensive manner and shall 11 address probable significant adverse environmental impacts from and reasonable 12 alternatives to the proposal. These may include, but are not necessarily limited to subjec 13 of area-wide concern such as cumulative impacts, housing, schools, public utilities, and 14 transportation. Subsequent project-specific proposals shall not be required to perform duplicative environmental review of issues which have been adequately reviewed in the 16 PEIS, but shall provide additional environmental review of other issues. These may 17 include: but are not necessarily limited to the direct impacts of the specific proposal, 16 substantial changes in the nature of the proposal or information regarding impacts which 19 indicate probable significant adverse environmental impacts which were not adequately 20 analyzed in the PEIS. Examples of project-specific direct impacts include local traffic 21 impacts, site aesthetics. and other issues not addressed by.the PEIS. 22 LU-(( ))49. In support of Centers, additional local action should include: 23 a. Strategies for land assembly within the center, if applicable; 24 b Infrastructure and service financing strategies and economic development 25 strategies for the centers: 26 C. Establishing expected permit processing flow commitments consistent wit 27 . the PEIS: and 28 d. Establishing a streamlined and simplified administrative appeal process 29 with fixed and certain timelines. 30 LU-((4))50. Jurisdictions should consider additional incentives for development 31 within Urban Centers such as: 32 • a. Setting goals for maximum permit review time and give priority to perm: 33 in Urban Centers: cppph2. 07/19/94 •40 1 i- X U • N 1 b. Policies to reduce or eliminate impact fees; 2 c. Simplifying and streamlining of the administrative appeal processes; 3 d. Eliminating project-specific requirements for parking and open space by 4 providing those facilities for.the Urban Center as'a whole; and 5 e. Establishing a bonus zoning program for the provision of urban amenitie! 6 4. Manufacturing/Industrial Center Designation Process 7 LU-((39))51. The location and number of regional Manufacturing/Industrial 8 Centers in King County ((wild-be)) were determined through the joint local and 9 countywide adoption process, based on the following steps: 1 o a. Countywide Planning Polices include specific criteria for 11 Manufacturing/Industrial Centers; 12 b. (( , 13 )) Jurisdictions electing (( filet-6cci)) to 14 contain a Manufacturing/Industrial Center provided the GMPC with a statement specifyi 15 (( )) how the Center will meet the intent of the Countywide Policies, includii 16 plans to adopt criteria, incentives, and other commitment to implement 17 Manufacturing/Industrial Centers; 18 c. (( 19 )) The GMPC reviewed the Manufacturing/Industrial Centers ((that 20 afe)) elected by local jurisdictions consistent with Policy FW-1, (( 21 ems)) and the following criteria: 22 1. The Center's location in the region, especially relative to existing ar 23 proposed transportation facilities and its potential for promoting a countywide system of 24 Manufacturing/Industrial Centers; 25 2. The total number of Centers in the county that are needed in the 26 county over the next twenty-years based on twenty years projected need for manufacturi 27 land to satisfy regional projections of demand for manufacturing land assuming a 10 28 percent increase in manufacturing jobs over this period; 29 3. The type and level of commitments that each jurisdiction has 30 identified for achieving Manufacturing/Industrial Center goals; 31 4. Review of other jurisdictional plans to ensure that growth focused t( 32 . Manufacturing/Industrial Centers is assured; and 33 5. The accessibility of the Center to existing or planned transportation cppph22. 07/19/94 41 11446i, facilities. 2 d. The GMPC confirmed the following Manufacturing/Indus r al Centers: 3 . North Tukwila. Duwamish and Ballard/interbay in Seattle. and the _Cent Industrial Area. 4 .5. Manufacturing/Industrial Center Criteria 5 LU-((40))5. Each jurisdiction which contains a regional Manufacturing/Industria 6 Center shall adopt in its comprehensive plan a definition of the Center which specifies th( 7 exact geographic boundaries of the Center. ((Eaeli-Genter-shell-be-eefted-te•)) 8 Jurisdictions with Manufacturing/Industrial Centers shall have zoning and detailed plans i 9 place to achieve the following goals by the year 2010. 1 o a. Preserve and encourage the aggregation of vacant or non- 11 manufacturing/industrial land parcels sized for manufacturing/industrial uses; 12 b. Discourage land uses ((ether-that)) which are not compatible with 13 manufacturing, ((mid)) industrial and advanced technology uses; ((mid)) 14 C. Accommodate a minimum of 10,000 jobs: and 15 d. Limit the size of offices and retail unless as an accessory use. 16 LU-((44))53. All jurisdictions support the development of a regional industrial 1 - siti:s policy (( 18 Reg-wAi4f-p )) to promote industrial activity. 19 LU-((42))54. Jurisdictions shall design access to the regional 20 Manufacturing/Industrial Centers to facilitate the mobility of employees by transit, and thi 21 mobility of goods by truck, rail or waterway as appropriate. Regional comprehensive 22 plans shall include strategies to provide capital improvement projects which support acees 23 for movement of goods. 24 i Lli-((44))55 Jurisdictions which contain regional Manufacturing/Industrial 25 Centers in conjunction with ((METRO)) transit agencies, shall identify transit station area 26 and right-of-way in each jurisdiction's comprehensive plan. ( , 27 28 ee(s).)) Where transit stations exist or areplanned jurisdictions in conjunction 29 with transit agencies shall identify various Qptions such as feeder systems. bicycle routes 30 and pedestrian systems to link the Center with its transit stations. 31 LU-((44))56. In order to reserve right-of-way and potential station areas for 32 high-capacity transit or transit hubs in the regional Manufacturing/Industrial Centers, 33 jurisdictions shall: cppph2. 07/19/94 42 • a. Upon adoption of specific high-capacity transit alignments by METRO, 2 adopt policies to avoid development which would restrict establishment of the 3 high-capacity transit system; 4 - b. Preserve right-of-ways controlled by the jurisdiction which are identified • 5 for potential transit use; and • 6 c. Provide METRO an option to acquire property owned by the jurisdiction. 7 LU-((4 ))2. 8 a 9 10 11 .)) Transit agencies shall strive to provide convenient and economic 12 mass transitrvice for the Manufacturing/Industrial Centers that will result in a decreast 13 in single-occupancy non-commercial vehicle trips within the Centers. 14 LU-((46))53. Jurisdictions' comprehensive plans for regional 15 Manufacturing/Industrial Centers shall demonstrate compliance with the criteria. In orde 16 to promote manufacturing/industrial growth, the Manufacturing/Industrial Center plan for 17 each jurisdiction shall establish strategies: 18 a. To provide capital facility improvement projects which support the 19 movement of goods and manufacturing/industrial operations; 20 b. To coordinate planning with serving utilities to ensure that utility facilities 21 are available to serve such centers: 22 (( ,--))e. To provide buffers around the Center to reduce conflicts with adjace 23 land uses: 24 ((e-))d. To facilitate land assembly; and 25 ((d-:))e. To attract the type of businesses that will ensure economic growth ai 26 stabilaN. 27 LU-((47)) _9. Each Manufacturing Center containing a minimum of 15,000 jobs 28 and having sufficient employment densities to support HCT should be served by HCT. l 29 is recqgnized that by their nature. Manufacturing/Industrial Centers may not achieve 30 densities necessary to make HCT service viable. Nevertheless. Manufacturing/Industrial 31 Centers which are located on the regional high capacity transit alignment and which mee 32 ,the transit-friendly criteria in policies LU-((44))54 through LU-((46))55. above ((sl l)) 33 should receive one or more high capacity transit stations and/or transit centers. cppph2. 07/19/94 43 1 6. Incentives for Manufacturing/Industrial Centers 2 LU-((48)) O. Countywide financing strategies shall be developed by the GMPC c 3 its successor ((19y Jrrly 1, 1993)) which: 4 . a. Identify regional funding sources; and . • 5 b. Set priorities and allocate funds for urban facilities and services including 6 social and human services in regional Manufacturing/Industrial Centers, and subarea 7 planning efforts in Manufacturing/Industrial Centers. 8 LU-((49))C.l. Jurisdictions shall consider conducting detailed SEPA review for t}'. 9 regional Manufacturing/Industrial Center at the planning stage so that project-specific 10 environmental review is minimized. 11 LU-((38))L2. To reduce or prevent conflicts, jurisdictions shall develop policies 1 12 establish and support normal manufacturing/industrial practices such as notices on 13 development permits for properties adjacent to a manufacturing/industrial center. 14 E. ((4.)) Activity Areas 15 16 . 17 16 19 , 2 0 tr+r.+- 21 Ac'rivIn Arru\ arc envicroned us areas containing moderate concentrations of 2 2 commercial development and hou.cint' that function as a focal point for the local 2 3 c'nmmcuntn gin vin Area\ contain a mix of land uses such as retail, recreation areas. 2 4 public fnc'ilutec, park. and open .~Pace. Althnueh smaller in scale than Urban and 25 Manufacturtne/lnductrial Centers. Activity Areas contain a sufficient density and mix of 26 cece\ to provide similar benefits. Activity Areas are designed to J) provide housing and 27 employment opportunities, 2) provide retail, services and business opportunities. 3) redu 2 8 automobile use and support efficient transit service. and 4) consume less land with urbat 2 9 development. Encouraging compact development within Activity Areas is an important 3 0 parr of the Counrvwide Planning Policy vision promoting inftll development and prevenri. 31 sprawl. • 32 Activity Areas are designated in local comprehensive plans. The size of the Acri1 33 Area and the mix and density of land uses are locally determined to meet community cppph2. 07/19/94 44 1 1 goals. Examples of Activity Areas ((might)) include the central business districts of 2 Kirkland, Burien, and Des Moines; East Hill in Kent; and a number of business district: 3 in Seattle, such as Lake City, Wallingford, and West Seattle Junction. 4 FW-17. Within the Urban•Growth Area:iurisdictions may locally designate one 5 more Activity Areas characterized by the following: 6 a. An array of land uses. including commercial developments hou_sin_g,pub1i 7 facilities and public open spaces: 8 b. Intensity/density of land uses sufficient to encourage frequent transit; 9 C. Pedestrian emphasis within the Activity Area; 1 o d, Emphasis on superior urban design which reflects the local community; 1 and • 12 e. Disincentives for single occupancy vehicle usage for commute purposes 13 during peak hours. 14 LU-((33))0. Jurisdictions shall designate the boundaries, (( ,) 15 and uses within all activity areas to provide for local employment, t mix of housing t) x 16 commercial activities, ((anti)) public facilities And open space. a.7 LU-(( 6))64. All Activity Areas that achieve sufficient employment and househo 18 densities should receive frequent peak hour transit service. Activity Areas may contain ; 19 high-capacity transit station or transit hub if the activity area: 20 a. is on an HCT corridor, or can serve as a transit hub; 21 b. Has pedestrian, bicycle, and transit-supportive site planning, building 22 design and road design regulations: and 23 c. Has parking regulations to encourage transit use. 24 LtU-(( ))65. To encourage transit use, jurisdictions ((s#re }) should establish 25 minimum and maximum parking requirements that reduce dependence on the single- 26 occupant vehicle. Jurisdictions should establish mechanisms to charge for single- 27 occupancy vehicle parking and/or a limit on the number of off-street parking spaces for 28 each activity center. All plans for Activity Areas shall encourage bicycle travel and 29 pedestrian activity. 30 ((&)) F. Urban Growth Outside of Centers 31 A variety of land uses and concentrations of growth occur within the Urban Gro} 32 .Area and outside of the Urban Centers and Manufacturing/Industrial Centers. Local la, • 33 use plans will he responsible for the designation, character, and utilization of urban are cppph2. 07/19/94 45 low 1 outside of centers. However, Countywide Policies are presented below to provide 2 guidance for these areas to ensure that they support the Centers growth concept. These 3 policies do not apply to the rural cities whose land use pattern is described by policy LU- 4. - a. ((policies LU 2b and.LU 27.)) . 5 Households and employment target rarPes by jurisdiction are described in this 6 •,section in order to establish the ahilim countywide- to accommodate the projected 20 yea 7 population and employment imwth The co ntvwide popiiktti'n_growth has been 8 established by the State of Washington Office of Financial Manasemenr as rcQuired by tht 9 Growth Manacement Act. The countywide employmentjmwrh has been derived from 1 o projections prepared by the Purer Sound Regional Council For purposes of this section. 11 rareet ranee.c are defined as: The commitment by each jurisdiction to ensure the ability u 12 accommodate. at a minimum._ erowth within the neat 20 years in housing (expressed in 13 households) and employment (expressed in emnloveesi. This commitment implies not onh 14 the policy and reculatory framework (comprehensive plan and zoning. but the commitmet 15 for funded infrastructure as well, consistent with the jurisdiction.f financing capacity. ley( 16 of .service standards and concurrency requirements. 17 1. Urban Residential Areas 16 Urban residential areas.form the bulk of the Urban Growth Area, and are home tc 19 u /art.'(' portion of the counnv'.s population. They will contain a mix of uses and will have 20 different characteristics in different neighborhoods. Generally, the character, form, 21 preservation and development of these areas is a local jurisdictional responsibility. 2 2 However.er. the rc'vdennul areas need to support the Centers concept and provide sufficient 2 ; oppornmrn. for L'ro►tth within the UGA. A substantial majority of new residential units 24 will he constructed ttvthrn urban residential areas. 25 Lti-((:‘I•))66. In order to ensure efficient use of the land within the Urban Growtt 26 Area, provide for housing opportunities, and to support efficient use of infrastructure, 27 each junsdiction shall: 28 a. Establish in its comprehensive plan a target minimum number of net new 29 ((dwelling units)) households the jurisdiction will accommodate in the next 20 years, 30 ((sue)) Jurisdictions shall adopt regulations to and commit to fund infrastructure sufficient 31 achieve the target number: 32 b. Establish a minimum density (not including critical areas) for new 33 construction in each residential zone; and cppph?. 07/19/94 46 1 c. Establish in the comprehensive plan.a.target mix of housing types for neu 2 development and adopt regulations to achieve the target mix. 3 LU-((32)).(22. The targets and regulations in LU-((34)) ((sly-be)) arebased c 4' the following steps: • 5 a. ((by October 1, 1992 t))2'he GMPC ((shell)) adopted ((a)) 1S. a target 6 number of net new ((eiwcll tg-its)) households to be accommodated countywide over tl 7 next 20 years as 195.000; s b. (($y October 1, 1992 t))The interjurisdictional staff committee ((shell 9 report)) reported to the GMPC or its_successor target ranges (( )) for 1 o net new ((d )) households for each (( 11 ))jurisdiction based on the following criteria: 12 1. The capacity and condition of existing and forecast ((infrnstructu re;); 13 capital facilities and utilities, 14 2. Proximity to major employment centers, 15 3. Access to existing and projected regional transit, 16 4. Capacity of undeveloped land and potential for redevelopment given 17 the character of existing development, 18 5. The need for a range of housing types, 19 6. Each jurisdiction's share of affordable housing as required by 20 Affordable Housing policies. 21 7. Consistency with the countywide numbers; 22 C. The target ranges as shown in Appendix 2 were recommended by the 23 GMPC, adopted and ratified pursuant to policy FW-1, Step 4c. 24 ((e-))d. The target ranges in each jurisdiction's comprehensive plan shall bg 25 consistent with the target ranges in Appendix 2 (( ,)) or shall state tt 26 reasons for deviating from the target ranges ((fa be)); 27 ((d•:))e. Through the process established under FW-1 Step 4b, if the 28 jurisdiction's comprehensive plan differs from the target, the GMPC may recommend 29 amendments to either the Countywide Planning Policies or local plans; and 30 ((e:))f. 31 32 -Monitoring should follow the process described in policy FW-1. 33 2. Urban Employment Growth cppph2. 07/19/94 47 11 A • 6 *.of 1 A portion of the urban employment growth will occur in activity areas and 2 neighborhoods in the urban area. This employment growth will support the Urban 3 • Centers, while balancing local employment opportunities in the urban area. 4 LU=((33)) $. Target ranges for employment growth outside Urban Centers ((sitel 5 se)) were established for cities and for unincorporated (( )) King Count 6 through the joint local and countywide adoption process based on the following steps: 7 a. ((By December 1992 t))The Growth Management Planning Council ((shell 8 adopted the 20 year target number for employment growth (( 9 rb - - _a ide -- rs)) $S 347.400. ((BrOctober 1992 t))Ihe 1 o interjurisdictional staff committee ((shall)) develop preliminary recommendations for i i target ranges fqr ((ef)) employment growth ((and-eapac y)) inside and outside urban area 12 ((in)) Beach (( )) jurisdictio 13 based on the following criteria: 14 1. Consistency with the countywide numbers; 2. The need to direct growth to urban centers based on consistency wit- 16 the multiple centers strategy; 17 3. Access to regional rapid transit and existing highway and arterial 1s capacity: 19 4. Availabilities of undeveloped land and potential for redevelopment 20 given the character of existing development: 21 5. The willingness of local jurisdictions to implement policies which 22 encourage transit such as S.O.V. parking charges and/or limits, transit, bicycle and 23 pedestrian supportive design. and the adoption of policies that encourage clustering of 24 commercial and residential areas: 25 b. The target ranges as shown in Appendix 2 were recommended by the 26 GMPC, adopted and ratified pursuant to Policy FW-1, Step 4. 27 ((t ))c. As part of their comprehensive plans, all jurisdictions shall indicate 28 planned employment capacity and targeted increases in employment for 20 years inside 29 and outside urban centers and shall show how their plans reflect the criteria in this policy 30 and 31 ((e-)) Through the process established under FW-1 Step 4((b)), if the 32 jurisdiction's comprehensive plan differs from the target range, the GMPC or its success( 33 may recommend amendments to either the Countywide Planning Policies or local plans. cppph.2. 07/19/94 48 • 1 3. Infffll•Development 2 Urban gmwrh occurs both in 'new' neighborhoods and.in existing neighborhood 3 Existing neighborhoods have a history of development patterns which have created a sen 4 . of identity. At the.same time a vital neighborhood adapts to change and develops its. owl 5 image. New development in these neighborhoods should build on the existing patterns in 6 manner which respects and enriches the neighborhood. For example in single family 7 neighborhoods selective permitting of accessory units and carriage houses may be more 8 compatible than new apartment buildings. 9 LU-((34))¢9. All jurisdictions shall develop neighborhood planning and design 10 processes to encourage infill development and enhance the existing community character 11 and mix of uses. 12 4.((5:)) Business/Office Parks 13 Business/Q,t9Sce Parks are areas where low-density office development is collectea 14 at locations separated,from an identified retail commercial core. These parks tend to ha 15 hot. densities and thus tend not to he supportive of transit or pedestrian circulation. The 16 employment opportunities generally do not require extensive land for their operations, ar 1 7 could he accommodated in Urban Centers. Because the further development of these 16 urea., may compete with the employment growth that is planned to support Urban Center 19 .v Vnihcant ficture eniplovment will not he encouraged in these areas. 20 Lt_I-((3S))70. Office building development is directed primarily to Urban Centen 21 Office building development outside Urban Centers including business/office parks shoul 22 occur within activity areas, which can be supported by and promote transit, pedestrian a bicycle uses. 2 4 LU-((49))71 . o 25 . Jurisdictions where consistent with their land use plans should 26 provide incentives for the development and redevelopment of an adequate supply of land 27 suitable for mixed light industrial/commercial and high technology. . 28 LU-((69))72. All jurisdictions shall establish mechanisms to encourage transit us, 29 Examples of potential mechanisms include a charge for S.O.V. parking and/or a limit or 30 the number of parking spaces for single occupancy vehicles within each existing 31 business/office park. Bicycle and pedestrian supportive design should be encouraged. 32 LU- (64-)2,3. ( ))-Jurisdictions ((shall((shell--este4lish 33 cppph2. 07/19/94 49 • • tow 3 Getters)) gre encouraged to site business/Off Ce lurks where ihev can be served by 4 • adeauate.5urface transportation and transit Where transit is.available and can result in 5 decreased demand for parking, higher density development should be considered. 6 LU-((62))74. All jurisdictions should develop planning mechanisms to assist in ti . 7 conversion of business/office parks to mixed use areas. Jurisdictions should ((e/tee ege 8 provide for inclusion of residential and neighborhood commercial land uses and open 9 space within existing business/office parks. 1 o Iil. TRANSPORTATION 11 A. Transportation Overview 12 RCW 36. 70A.070(6) (Growth Management Act)fundamentally changes the way ti 13 comprehensive planning will he done within the State of Washington. The Act places 14 special emphasis on transportation making it unlawful to approve development for which 1 5 I the approving jurisdiction cannot demonstrate the availability of facilities, strategies and 16 services ►t'hich are needed to accommodate the growth in traffic at the adopted level-of- I 17 j service within six year~. Future development activity will he constrained by a 18 /ur,Ad,ct,on 't uhiliry to finance and provide transportation improvements or strategies. 1 Ti,,\ loci hot .rani' pen. significant implications fur all jurisdictions which are dependent 2 0 upon the rc't',on 't transportation systems because: 21 I. Protected traffic growth on the.freeway and arterial system within the 22 region greatly exceeds the foreseeable collective ability to finance and construct the 2 3 unnroi enuen,\ „ceded In retain historical levels-of-service. 2 4 I 2. Maintaining the current level of personal mobility by single occupant 2 5 reh,c/et ut.i/I he a costly public investment that will negatively impact the regional qualir 2 6 of life, create severe impacts to sensitive areas, degrade environmental quality, and 27 increase energy use and the consumption of land. 2 8 3. Development within any one jurisdiction can be severely impacted by 29 decisions and actions beyond that jurisdiction's control: 3 0 •WSDOT may he unable to program improvements concurrent with a 31 jurisdiction's approval of a development permit. 32 *Metro may not he able to respond to transit levels-of-service adopted by 3 3 local jurisdictions. cppph2. 07/19/94 .50 • NOW *40111 1 •A jurisdiction may adopt level-of-service standards for arterials within us 2 jurisdiction and decline to accept improvements necessary to mitigate transportation 3 impacts fmm a proposed development in an adjoining jurisdiction. 4. ••Cumulative, growth•throughout the region will cause traffic growth on the 5 existing network and may thereby exhaust the capacity for local jurisdictions to approve 6 development. 7 In light of these,financial constraints and potential dangers, it will be necessary ; 8 undertake a dramatically different approach for both transportation planning and land u 9 planning, than has been done in the past. This is necessary if the region is to avoid 1 o haphazard denials of development permits following the July 1994 deadline for imple- 11 menting ordinances. In order to limit sprawl, create the desired urban form, and pmvic 12 some measure of predictability for landowners and developers, the region's scarce 13 resources.for transportation capacity improvements must be used prudently to focus on 14 areas where zoning and densities support a multi-modal transportation system. System 15 capaciry investments should he targeted_first to those areas where the existing land use 16 and transportation system provides some hope of achieving the desired multi-modal levei .17 of-service within six. sears. 18 B. Transportation Policies 19 FW-((44))18. The land use pattern shall be supported by a balanced transportatic 20 system which provides for a variety of mobility options. This system shall be 21 cooperatively planned, financed. and constructed. Mobility options shall include a High 22 Capacity Transit system which links the urban centers and is supported by an extensive 23 High Occupancy Vehicle system, local community transit system for circulation within t 24 centers and to the non-center urban areas, and non-motorized travel options. 25 FW-((-H))19. All jurisdictions in the county, in cooperation with Metro, the 26 Metropolitan Planning Organization, and the State, shall develop a balanced transportati( 27 system and coordinated financing strategies and land use plan which.implement regional 28 mobility and reinforce the countywide vision. Vision 2020 Regional Growth Strategies 29 • shall be recognized as the framework for creating a regional system of Centers linked b: 30 High Capacity Transit and an interconnected system of freeway High Occupancy Vehicl 31 (HOV) lanes, and supported by a transit system. 32 FW-((-1-6))20. In recognition of the fact that King County is the regional freight 33 distribution hub and a major international trade gateway, and that freight transportation cppph2. 07/19/94 51 one of the state's most important basic sector economic activities, goods mobility by all 2 modes shall be included as a component of comprehensive plans. 3 T-1. The countywide transportation system shall promote the mobility of people 4 and goods and shall be a multi-modal system based on regional priorities consistent with 5 adopted land use plans. The transportation system shall include the following: 6 a. An aggressive transit system, including High Capacity Transit; 7 • b. High Occupancy Vehicle facilities; 8 c. Freight railroad networks; 9 d. Marine transportation facilities and navigable waterways; 1 o e. Airports; 11 f. Transportation Demand Management actions; 12 g. Non-motorized facilities; and 13 h. Freeways. highways, and arterials. 14 T-2. King County, its cities, adjacent counties, Metro, and the Washington State 15 Department of Transportation (WSDOT) shall support the continuous, comprehensive an 16 cooperative transportation planning process conducted by the Puget Sound Regional 17 Council (PSRC) pursuant to its Metropolitan Planning Organization (MPO) designation. 1 s The primary forum for the development of regional transportation systems plans and 19 strategies shall be the PSRC. as the MPO. 20 T-3. The annual update and approval of the six-year Transportation Improvemer 21 Program (TIP) by the PSRC should be the primary tool for prioritizing regional 22 transportation improvements and programming regional transportation revenues. 23 T-4. The GMPC or its successor shall have the ongoing responsibility for the 24 following: 25 a. Developing and maintaining coordinated level-of-service standards and a 26 concurrence system, for countywide transit routes and arterial streets, including state 27 .facilities: 28 b. Developing regionally consistent policies for implementing countywide 29 Transportation Demand Management actions and the Commute Trip Reduction Act 30 including, but not limited to, parking policies, with an examination of price as a 31 determinant of demand: and 32 c. Developing and recommending transportation financing strategies, 33 including recommendations for prioritizing capacity improvements eligible to receive cppph2. 07/19/94 .52 JL .4100 1 federal funds available to the region under the Inter-modal Surface Transportation 2 Efficiency Act (ISTEA). 3 1.. High Capacity Transit/Regional Transit Project (HCT/RTP) 4 T-5: .Each Urban Center will be providing for a minimum of 15,000 jobs and 5 should be served by High Capacity Transit (HCT). Each Manufacturing Center 6 containing a minimum of 15,000 jobs and having sufficient employment densities to 7 support HCT should be served by HCT. All jurisdictions that would be served by HCT 8 shall plan for needed HCT rights-of-way, stations and station supportive transportation 9 facilities and land uses in their comprehensive plans. The land use and transportation- 1 0 elements of comprehensive plans shall incorporate a component to reflect future 11 improvement needs for High Capacity Transit. Interim regional transit service should be 12 provided to centers until the center is served by HCT. If voters do not approve HCT 13 local option taxes, jurisdictions shall address this implication in the reassessment phase. 14 T-6. WSDOT should assign a high priority to completion of the core HOV lanes 15 in the central Puget Sound region. King County, its cities, and Metro Council representa 16 tives on the Transportation Policy and Executive Boards of the Puget Sound Regional 17 Council (PSRC) shall make completion of this system a high priority in programming the 1s federal funds available to the region. 15 2. Non-motorized Transportation 20 T-7. The transportation element of Comprehensive Plans shall include pedestrian 21 and bicycle travel as part of the transportation system and be developed on a coordinated, 22 regional basis. The bicycle and pedestrian element shall be a part of the funding 23 component of the capital improvement program. 24 3. Freeways/Highways/Arterials 25 T-8. In order to maintain regional mobility, a balanced multi-modal transportatior 26 system shall be planned that includes freeway, highway and arterial improvements by 27 making existing roads more efficient. These improvements should help alleviate existing 28 traffic congestion problems, enhance HOV and transit operations, and provide access to 29 new desired growth areas, as identified in adopted land use plans. General capacity 30 improvements promoting only Single Occupant Vehicle traffic shall be a lower priority. 31 Transportation plans should consider the following mobility options/needs: 32 a. Arterial HOV treatments, 33 b. Driveway access management for principal arterials within the Urban cppph2. 07/19/94 53 11446 4 u 1 Growth Area; and 2 C. Improvements needed for access to manufacturing and industrial centers, 3 marine and air terminals. .FW-((4.)) 1. Infrastructure planning and financing shall be coordinated among • 5 jurisdictions to direct and prioritize countywide facility improvements to implement the 6 countywide vision and land use plans. 7 FW-((4.8))22. Where appropriate, King County and its cities shall adopt a clear 8 definition of level-of-service and concurrency requirements and establish a consistent 9 process for implementing concurrency, including accountability for impacts for adjacent 10 jurisdictions. 11 FW-((-1-9))2. Each jurisdiction shall identify the facilities needed to ensure that 12 services are provided consistent with the community's adopted service levels. Timeline: 13 for the construction of the needed facilities shall be identified. 14 4. Transportation Level-of-Service (LOS) 15 T-9. Level-of-service standards shall be used as a "tool" to evaluate concurrenc's 16 for long-range transportation ((tran3pefte-tiett)) planning, development review and 17 programming of transportation investments. 18 T-10. Each local jurisdiction shall establish mode-split goals for non-SOV travel 19 to all significant employment centers to reflect that center's contribution to the solution c 20 the region's transportation problem. Mode-split goals will vary according to developme 21 densities. access to transit service and other alternative travel modes and levels of 22 congestion. Comprehensive plans shall demonstrate what transportation system 2 3 improvements. demand management and land use strategies will be implemented to 24 achieve these mode-split goals. These local goals shall be coordinated to achieve county 25 and regional goals. 26 T-1 1 . Elements to be considered in the level-of-service standard are mobility 27 options that encourage the use of transit, other high occupancy vehicles, demand 28 management actions. access to transit, and non-motorized modes of travel. These 29 standards shall be consistent with the requirements of the Commute Trip Reduction Act. 30 T-12. Mode split goals and measures of mobility for transit, ridesharing and 31 non-motorized travel shall be established by local jurisdictions and ME 1"lRO. 32 , T-13. Level-of-service standards shall vary by differing levels of development 33 patterns and growth management objectives. Lower arterial standards, tolerating more cppph' 07/19/94 54 A. 1 Z -i V • 1 congestion, shall be established for urban centers. Transit LOS standards may focus on 2 higher service levels in and between centers and decrease as population and employment 3 densities decrease. 4 ••T-l4. Metro should develop transit level-of-service standards which provide.the 5 county and cities with realistic service expectations to support adopted land uses and 6 desired growth management objectives. These standards should consider that route 7 spacing and frequency standards are necessary for differing service conditions including: 8 a. Service between designated centers served by High Capacity Transit; 9 b. Service between designated centers not served by High Capacity Transit; 10 and 11 c. Service to areas outside centers. 12 5. Reassessment 13 T-I5. Local governments shall work together to reassess regional land use and 14 transportation elements if transportation adequacy and concurrency cannot be met. Shout 15 funding fall short for transportation improvements or strategies needed to accommodate 16 growth. the following actions should be considered: 17 a. Adjust land use and level-of-service standards to better achieve mobility 18 and the re2lonal vision: 19 b. Make full use of all feasible local option transportation revenues authorize 2 0 but not yet implemented: and 21 c. Work with WSDOT, Metro, and the private sector to seek additional state 2 2 transportation revenues and local options to make system improvements necessary to 23 tCeeeor teII accommodate projected employment and population growth. 2-: 6. Financing 2 5 T-16. Transportation elements of Comprehensive Plans shall reflect the 2 6 preservation and maintenance of transportation facilities as a high priority to avoid costly 2 7 replacements and to meet public safety objectives in a cost-effective.manner. 2 8 T-17. Developer impact fees shall be structured to ensure that new development 29 contributes its fair share of the resources needed to mitigate the impact on the 3 0 transportation system. Adjoining jurisdictions shall execute interlocal agreements for 31 impact fees which recognize that traffic generated in one jurisdiction contributes to the 3 2 ,need to make transportation improvements across jurisdictional boundaries. Impact fees 3 3 shall not be assessed to cure that portion of the improvement attributable to correcting cppph2. 07/19/9-1 55 1 1 4 4 6 • • 1 existing deficiencies. 2 T-18. Existing local option transportation funding shall be applied within King 3 County as follows: 4 • . " a. Employee tax base -= reserved for city street utility development; • 5 b. Commercial parking tax — defer action, pending development of a regior 6 TDM strategy; 7 C. HOV acceleration financing — defer until after High Capacity Transit vot 8 and 9 d. Local option gas tax — consider as potential source to address 1 o transportation "concurrency" needs of county and cities only after vote on High Capacir 11 Transit. 12 T-19. Regional revenues (such as Inter-modal Surface Transportation Efficiency 13 Act funds) which provide discretion should be used to address regional mobility projects 14 and strategies, including such strategies as creating centers or enhancing transit/HOV-SC 15 mode split. 16 7. State Transportation Role 17 T-20. Consistent with the countywide vision, local governments shall coordinate 18 with the State on land use and transportation systems and strategies which affect state 19 facilities and programs. 20 T 1 . State capital improvement decisions and policy actions shall be consistent 21 with regional and countywide goals and plans. The State shall ensure its transportation 22 capital improvement decisions and programs support the adopted land use plans and 23 transportation actions. 24 T The State and local governments shall use the same capital programming 25 and budgeting time frame that all local governments and the county use, a minimum of 26 years. for making capital decisions and for concurrency management. 27 8. Siting Regional and Countywide Transportation Facilities 28 T-23. King County, the cities, the Puget Sound Regional Council, the State, 29 Metro, and other transportation providers shall identify significant regional and/or 30 countywide land acquisition needs for transportation and establish a process for 31 prioritizing and siting the location of transportation facilities. • cppph2. 07/I9/91 56 11. 4 • 1 IV. COMMUNITY CHARACTER AND OPEN SPACE 2 A measure of the success of planning for growth is the extent to which we restore 3 maintain and create good places to live, work and play. We must encourage growth wh. 4 improves our neighborhoods and landscapes, and builds a strong sense of place. The 5 following policies on cultural resources, civic architecture and landmarks, multi-use 6 roadways, infill development, and incentives for urban and rural design, aim to promote 7 good community character. 8 FW-((a)))24. All jurisdictions shall support the county's existing diversity of 9 places to live, work and recreate and the.ethnic diversity of our communities. The . 10 countywide development pattern shall include sufficient supply of quality places for 11 housing, employment, education, recreation, and open space and the provision of 12 community and social services. 13 FW-((-24))25. Each urban area shall be characterized by superior urban design a 14 locally defined. 15 FW-(( ))2.6. Significant historic, archaeological, cultural, architectural and 16 environmental features shall be respected and preserved. 17 A. Historic Resources 18 Historic resources create a sense of local identity and history, enhance the quali. 19 of life, support conimunir vitality, and othenvise enrich our lives. Historic resources a 2 0 non-renewable: they embody the unique heritage and evolution of particular places. 21 Thoughtful management of these resources contributes to economic development and 2 2 moderates some of the harmful eflectx of rapid growth. Planning for historic resources 2 3 include.‘ prntecttn.L' archaeological sites and historic buildings and landscapes, 24 encouraging expre.c.►ion of diverse ethnic and folk traditions, and supporting activities fc 25 children and \'nuth. 2 6 CC-1. All jurisdictions should work individually and cooperatively to identify, 27 . evaluate. and protect historic resources including continued and consistent protection fo, 28 historic resources and public art works. 29 CC-2. All junsdictions shall encourage land use patterns and implement 3 0 regulations that protect and enhance historic resources, and sustain historic community 31 character. 32 B. Urban Design • 3 3 Governments should he leaders in providing structures, public spaces, parks ant cppph2. 07/19/94 57 JP144k5 *00 streets which support the quality of our region. Civic design should express the region': 2 values and vision, and should provide landmarks which contribute to our sense of place. 3 Additionally, individual jurisdictions can-nurture their individual character by developer, 4. a clear set.of goals.and policies-which outline the public interest in the design'of private 5 development in the urban and rural communities. 6 CC-3. All jurisdictions shall promote a high quality of design and site planning 7 • publicly-funded construction (such as civic buildings, parks, bridges, transit stops), and 8 private development. 9 C. Human and Community Services 10 Human and community services are: social and health services; emergency 11 shelters: meeting places; performing arts and cultural activities; schools; libraries; park 12 and recreation; and.fire and police protection. 13 CC-4. Human and community service planning activities shall support Countywi 14 Planning Policies and the countywide land development pattern. 15 CC-5. All jurisdictions shall identify essential community and human services ar 16 include them in land use, capital improvement, and transportation plans. 17 D. Open Space 18 Open space lands are essential to the community character of King County. The 19 provide visual varier' and relief.frotn developed areas, protect environmental quality, an 20 provide wildlife habitat and.foster opportunities for outdoor recreation. Open space 21 corridors physically and ftmcrionally link open space lands. 22 The challenge for jurisdictions is to establish programs that contribute to the 23 protection, accecsihiliry and .cte►vard.chip of open space lands and corridors. The GMA 24 requires luri.cdtcnnn.c to form linkages between and within population centers with lands 2 5 useful for recreation, truth, ►wildlife habitat and connection of critical areas. These opf 26 space lands and corridors or greenways should he selected,and preserved to form an 27 interconnected .system regionally and within jurisdictions locally and should be stewarde 28 to ensure continuing environmental and ecological significance. Where appropriate, the 29 regional system and its local components should provide for multiple benefits and 30 .functions, which will require careful planning and management to ensure compatibility 31 long-term viability of the benefits and functions. 32 Open space lands and corridors have significance at both the local and regional 33 scale. Identification and protection of local open spaces will be considered within the cppph2. 07/19/94 •58 1 comprehensive plans of each jurisdiction. On an individual basis,jurisdictions should 2 strive to identify, establish and protect open space lands of local significance that also 3 . compliment, adjoin or enhance the regional system. The regional open space system 4 includes open space lands and corridors that have importance beyond jurisdictional 5 boundaries and will require multi jurisdictional coordination to identify, protect and 6 steward. 7 FW-((.23))22. All jurisdictions shall cooperatively identify, establish, protect and 8 steward urban and rural open space corridors of regional significance. 9 CC-6. A regional open space system shall be established to include lands which: id a. Provide physical and/or visual buffers such as open spaces which help to 11 separate incompatible uses, distinguish the urban and rural areas, define urban growth 12 boundaries, or establish the character of a neighborhood, community, city or region; 13 b. Provide active and passive outdoor recreational opportunities which are 14 compatible with the environmental and ecological values of the site; and/or 15 c. Contain natural areas, habitat lands, natural drainage features, and/or othe 16 environmental, cultural, and scenic resources. 1 CC-7. All jurisdictions shall work cooperatively to identify and protect open spar 18 corridors of regional significance. This process shall include: 19 a. Identification of regional open space lands and corridors which form a 20 functionally and' physically connected system with environmental, ecological, recreational 21 and aesthetic significance and which is readily accessible to our urban populations; 22 b. Identification of implementation strategies and regulatory and non- 23 regulatory techniques to protect the lands and corridors, including collaboration and 24 coordination with land trusts and other land preservation organizations; and 25 C. Development of management plans and strategies to sustain the corridors' 26 open space benefits-and functions of the preserved lands and corridors. 27 CC-8. Water bodies and rivers of the Puget Sound region form an important . 28 element of the open space system. Jurisdictions shall work to protect visual access to 29 water bodies and rivers, and provide for physical access where appropriate. 30 CC-9. Countywide funding shall be available for the acquisition, maintenance anc 31 stewardship of parks and open space, a) advancing the development of the regional open 3 2 . space system which has been cooperatively identified by the jurisdictions, and b) ensurinl 3 3 the ready access of our citizens residing in Urban Centers to the regional open space cppph2. 07/19/94 59 11446 1 system. 2 CC-10. The conceptual map of open space systems contained in the 1988 King 3 ' County Open Space Plan shall be used as the planning basis for regional open space land 4 • and corridors. All jurisdictions will work cooperatively to revise and supplement this m: 5 to direct the protection of these valuable resources throughout the county. 6 CC-11. All jurisdictions shall work cooperatively to ensure parks and open space 7 are provided as development and redevelopment occur. 8 CC-12. All jurisdictions shall use the full range of regulatory and land 9 preservation tools available to create, maintain and steward the regional open space syste 10 which has been cooperatively identified. 11 CC-13. All jurisdictions shall develop coordinated level of service standards for 12 the provision of parks and open spaces. 13 V. AFFORDABLE HOUSING 14 Adequate housing, .for all economic segments of the population, is a basic need of 15 King County's residents and an issue of countywide concern. Affordable housing needs 16 must he addressed by local governments working in cooperation with the private sector 1 and nonprofit housing agencies. 18 The GitMA requires countywide policies to address parameters for the distribution 19 affordable housing, including housing.for all income groups. This complex issues require 2 0 adequate information regarding current housing resources and housing needs, which is 21 being developed for comprehensive plan housing elements, as well as in-depth discussion 2 2 of values and priorities for housing development. 23 Providing- .sufficient land.for housing development is an essential step in promoting 2 4 affordable housin . Affordable housing can he encouraged by zoning additional land for 2 5 higher residential densities, which helps provide needed capacity for growth, reduces Ian 2 6 development cost per unit(()), and allows for lower cost construction types such as 27 attached dwellings. Higher density housing includes a range of housing types: small-lot 28 .single family, attached single°family, mobile home parks, apartments and condominiums. 2 9 in addition, zoning changes that permit additional housing in established areas, such as 3 0 accessory units, carriage houses, and residences built above commercial uses, increase 31 affordable housing opportunities. 32 FW-((?4))28. All jurisdictions shall provide fo a diversity of housing types to 3 3 meet a variety of needs and provide for housing opportunities for all economic segments cppph2. 07/19/94 60 -r-- — v • of the population, ((in+eemes)). All jurisdictions shall cooperatively establish a process t 2 ensure an equitable and rational distribution of low-income and affordable housing 3 throughout the county in.accordance with land use policies, transportation, and 4 .• employment locations. • • 5 AH-I. All jurisdictions shall plan fir housing to meet the needs of all economic . 6 segments of the copulation. Each jurisdiction shall specify.. based on the projected 7 number of net new housing units anticipated in its comprehensive plan. the estimated 8 number of units which will be affordable for the following income segments: 0 to 50 9 percent 9f the countywide median household income. 50 to 80 percent of median, 80 to 10 120 percent of median. and above 120 percent median. The estimates for housing 11 affordable to households below 80 percent of median income shall be consistent with 12 countywide objectives for low and moderate income housing in Policy AH-2, The 13 estimated number of units for each income segment shall be reported to the GMPC 14 following adoption of the comprehensive plan. for the purpose of countywide monitoring 1E, of capacity for housing development. 16 ((A+i 5)). Within the urban growth area, each jurisdiction shall demonstrate (iffit e)) its ability to accommodate sufficient, affordable housing for all economic is seemcnts of the population. Local actions may include zoning land for development of 19 sufficient densities. revising development standards and permitting procedures as needed 20 to encourage affordable housing, (( ,))-reviewing codes f i redundancies and inconsistencies, and providing opportunities for a ((€44)) range of 22 housing types, such as accessory dwelling units, manufactured homes ((on al 2? )) group homes and foster care facilities, apartments, townhouses and attached single 24 tamik housing. 25 BAH-2((4)). All turfsdictions shall share the responsibility for achieving a rational 26 and equitable distribution of affordable housing to meet the housing needs of low and 27 moderate income residents in King County. The distribution of housing affordable to to 28 and moderate income households shall ((Meet)) take into consideration the need for 29 proximity to lower wage employment, ((ate)) access to transportation and human 30 services,((;)) and the adequacy of infrastructure to support housing development; 31 recognize each jurisdiction's past and current efforts to provide housing affordable to lop 32 and moderate-income households; avoid over-concentration of assisted housing; and 33 increase housing opportunities and choices for low and moderate income households in cppph2. 07/19/94 61 11 4 6 .. . communities throughout King County. Each jurisdiction shall give equal consideration tc 2 local and countywide housing needs. 3 A. Existing Needs for Affordable Housing 4 Each jurisdiction shall participate in developing countywide'housing resources anc 5 programs to assist the law number of low and moderate income households who 6 currently do not have affordable. avoroariate houSina. These countywide efforts will he. 7 reverse current trends which concentrate low income housing el m.• 14 ,'ties in certain 8 communities. and achieve a more equitable_participation by local jurisdictions in low 9 income housing development and services. Countywide efforts should give priority to 1 o assisting households below 50 percent of median income that are in greatest need and 11 communities with high proportions of low and moderate income residents. 12 By October. 1994. the GMPC or its successor shall appoint elected and communi 13 reoresensatives to develop recommendations for providing low and moderate income 14 housing and related services. within one year the committee shall recommend to the GN'IPC or its successor: 16 1 . new countywide funding source(s) for housing production and services. a? 17 a elan to estahlish this funding within three years: 18 2. participation by local governments, including appropriate public and priv; 19 financing. such that each jurisdiction contributes on fair share basis: and 20 3 ohiectives for housing and related services. including measurable levels o 21 housing production and costs to provide necessary related service. 22 Countywide programs should provide the following types of housing and related 2 3 services: 2 I love income housing development, including new construction. acquisitior 25 and rehabilitation; 26 2. housing assistance, such as rental vouchers and supportive services: 27 3. assistance to expand the capacity of nonprofit organizations to develop 28 housing and provide housing related services: 29 4. programs to assist homeless individuals and families: 30 5. programs to prevent homelessness: and 31 6. assistance to low and moderate income home buyers cppph.2. 07/t 9/94 62 1 $. Future Needs for Affordable Housing 2 Each jurisdiction shall specify the range and amount of housing affordable to low 2 3 moderate income households to be accommodated in its comprehensive plan. Eg 4. jurisd.i_cti_on shall elan fora'number of housing units affordable.to households with incon 5 between 50 and 80 percent of the County median household income that is equal to 17 nerd 6 Qf.. roiected net household growth. In addition each jurisdiction shall plan for a numl 7 of housing units affordable So households with incomes below 50 percent of median inco 8 that is either 20 percent or 24 percent of its praiected net household growth. For t 9 housing, the target oercentase shall be determined usinLthe Affordable Housing Job/Housi 10 Index developed using Census-based information.. which is contained in Appendix 3. 11 ((Ail 2.)) Each jurisdiction shall show in its comprehensive plan how it will use 12 policies, incentives, regulations and programs to provide its share of housing affordable • 13 low and moderate-income households .)) 14 Each jurisdiction should apply strategies which it determines to be most appropriate to tt 15 local housing market. For example, units affordable to low and moderate income 16 households may be developed through new construction, projects that.assure long-term 17 affordability of existing housing, or accessory housing units added to existing structures. 18 Local actions may include: 19 a. Identifying the costs to develop and preserve subsidized housing and othe: 20 low-cost housing not provided by private development in the local housing market. and 21 identifying sources of funding; 22 b. Revising land use regulations as needed to remove any unreasonable 23 requirements that may create harriers to siting and operating housing for special needs 24 groups. Special needs housing serves persons. who, by virtue (( re)) of disability or 25 other circumstances, face difficulty living independently and require supportive services 26 a transitional or long-term basis: and 27 c. Adopting land use incentives programs or other regulatory measures to 28 encourage private and nonprofit development 29 Small. fully built cities and towns that are not planned to. grow substantially unde 30 GMA may work cooperatively with other jurisdictions and/or subregional housing 31 agencies to meet their housing targets. 32 In areas identified as city expansion areas. King County and cities should plan 33 cooperatively for affordable housing development and preservation. cppph2. 07/19/94 63 11446 ' •4 • • • • • 1 � • • 2 • • • • 4 • ' • • • • 5 ' • • 6 + 7 1992. 8 • • 10 ' • • 11 ' 12 b 13 4etesiftt • 14 15 b 16 rate hettstftg 17 18 a 19 a 20 21 d S. rntcg►es. 22 23 24 25 r a b 26 27 , 28 29 )) 30 AH-3. Each jurisdiction shall evaluate its existing resources of subsidized and 31 low-cost non-subsidized housing and identify housing that may be lost due to 32 .redevelopment, deteriorating housing conditions, or public policies or actions. Where 33 feasible, each (( )) jurisdiction shall develop strategies to preserve existing low-incor cppph2. 07/19/94 64 144 (5 housing (( e)) and provide relocation assistance to low income residents who 2 may be displaced. 3 AH-4. The GMPC or its successor shall identify ways to expand technical 4 assistance to local jurisdictions in affordable housing techniques Technical assistance 5 should include project case studies and model ordinances covering such topics 6 development and financing of nonprofit housing provision of housing-related services,. 7 incentives programs for affordable housing- regulations that encourage well-designed 8 higher density housing improvements to development permit processing and standard, is 9 reduce development costs. and public education and involvement, The Affordable - i o Housing Task Force Report. dated March 1994 contains a summary of actions that local 11 governments may use to encourage affordable housing. 12 AH-5 ((4)). All jurisdictions shall monitor residential development within their 13 jurisdiction and determine annually the total number of new and redeveloped units 14 receiving permits and units constructed, housing types, developed densities and remaining 15 capacity for residential growth. Housing prices and rents also should be reported. based 16 on affordability to four income categories: 0 to 50 percent of median income. 50 to 80 17 percent of median, 80 to 120 percent of median. and above 120 percent of median, Kini 18 County shall report annually on housing development, the rate of housing cost and price 19 increases and available residential capacity countywide in its annual growth reporting. 20 The Affordable Housing and Data Technical Forums_ which are comprised of city 21 and county staff and private housing industry representatives, shall develop a uniform 22 approach for monitoring housing permit activity_ construction_ and affordability. Where 23 feasible, the Af fordable•Housing and Data Technical Forums shall consider collecting 24 statistics such as: housing units receiving building permits by income category. total unit! 25 constructed by income category. low and moderate income housing acquired or preserve( 26 households receiving rental assistance, and other local housing activities. In addition . • 27 •where feasible, planning and monitoring for affordable housing should use the median 28 household income for King County indexed by household size, tblished annually by the 29 U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development. Calculations of affordable house 30 prices should assume standard Federal Housing Administration lending criteria and 31 minimum downpayments. 32 AH-6. Every five years. beginning in 1999. the GMPC or its successor 33 organization responsible for monitoring growth management implementation shall evaluat cppph2. 07/19/94 65 1144 1 achievement of countywide and 10�1 coals for boating for all economic segments of the 2 population. Tie GMPC or its successor shall consider annual worts =spared under 3 Policy AH-5 as well as market conditions and other factors affecting housing a dev • . „ nt. If she GMPC or its successor determines that housinz Manned for any • 5 economic segment falls short of the need _for such housing.the GMPC or its successor 6 may recommend additional actions. 7 As Dart of its evaluation, the GMPC or its successor shall review local 8 performance in meeting low and moderate income housing needs. The basis for 9 determining local performance shall be a jurisdiction§ participation in countywide or to subregional efforts to address existing housing_needs and actual development of the tame? 11 percentage of low and moderate income housing units as adopted in its comprehensive 12 plan. In establishing planning targets to address future affordable housing needs. it is 13 recognized that success will be dependent in part upon regional factors beyond the contro 14 of any single jurisdiction. Any one jurisdiction acting alone. or even in concert with oth, 15 local governments. may or may not be able to achieve its ((these)) targets in these 16 policies. despite its best efforts. Success will require cooperation and support for 17 affordable housing from the state, federal and local governments, as well as the private 18 sector. The significant role of the market must also be recognized. In determining 19 performance the GMPC or its successor shall therefore use reasonable judgment. and als( 20 shall consider these market and other factors, as well as action taken to encourage 21 development and preservation of low and moderate income housing, such as local fundini 22 development code changes. and creation of new programs. 23 VI. CONTIGUOUS AND ORDERLY DEVELOPMENT And PROVISION 24 OF URBAN SERVICES TO SUCH DEVELOPMENT 25 Chapter /l, "Lund Use Pattern, " contains policies for phasing development within 26 the Urban Growth Areu. An integral component of the phasing process is ensuring that 27 development is accompanied by a ficll range of urban services. Equally important is. 28 ensuring that infrastructure improvements are not provided in advance of development 29 which could undermine the countywide development pattern. This chapter provides 30 policies which support phasing within the Urban Growth Area and ensure the integrity of 31 the countywide land development pattern. 32 FW-(R3))29. Planning for and financing of services shall be coordinated among 33 jurisdictions to direct and prioritize countywide facility improvements to implement the cppph2. 07/19/94 66 ‘-± " V • Soo countywide policies. 2 FW-(06)))Q. Jurisdictions shall identify the services needed to achieve adopted 3 service levels. Timelines for constructing needed services shall be identified. 4 •• .FW-(( )) . Protection'of public health and safety and the environment shall be 5 given high priority in decision-making about infrastructure improvements. County 6 residents in both urban and rural areas shall have reasonable access to a high-quality 7 drinking water source meeting all federal and state drinking water requirements. 8 Management and operation of existing on-site septic systems shall not result in adverse 9 impacts to public health or the environment. 1 o A. General Policies 11 To ensure that land use is accompanied with the maximum possible use of existing 12 facilities and cost-effective service provisions and extensions, and to encourage 13 development of strong, interrelated communities, policies are needed which integrate a fui 14 range of urban services with land-use planning and environmental protection. Urban 5 \ervicc definitions should he guided by "public services, " "public facilities, " and "urban 16 ,Ly)i'ernmc'ntal services" us defined in RCW 36. 70A (GMA). 17 Comnucnin. and human services policies are included under Chapter IV, 18 "Communcnv Character and Open Space, " and transportation policies are included under 19 Chapter III. "Transportation. " Several countywide planning efforts provide direction for 20 achieving the tnte,t'ration of services, aquifer and natural resource protection, and land 21 use planning. These include the Coordinated Water System Plans, Seattle Regional 22 Comprehensive Water Supply Plan, Groundwater Management Plans, Basin Plans, Chelai 2 3 Agreement Regional Water Re.sources Planning Process, Flood Hazard Reduction Plan, 24 wasi wuter 2020 Plus. Human Services Strategies Report, and the King County Sewerage 2 5 General Plan Furthermore, there are state mandates which affect the provision of 2 6 services. For example, water resource allocation must accommodate all reasonable 2 7 out-of-stream needs and maintain sufficient flows for in-stream uses.. The following 2 8 policies transcend Urban and Rural land use designations and apply countywide. 2 9 1. Urban Services Required as Growth Occurs 3 o CO-1. Jurisdictions shall identify the full range of urban services and how they 31 plan to provide them. 32 2. Conservation, Efficiency, Cost Effectiveness and New Technologies 3 3 CO-2. Jurisdictions and other urban service providers shall provide services and cppph2. 07/19/94 67 11446 i manage natural resources efficiently, through regional coordination, conjunctive use of 2 resources, and sharing of facilities. Interjurisdictional planning efforts shall evaluate 3 approaches to share and conserve_ resources. 4 CO-3. Service provision shall 'be coordinated to ensure the protection and 5 preservation of resources in both rural areas and in areas that are developing, while 6 addressing service needs within areas currently identified for growth. 7 CO-4. All jurisdictions acknowledge the need to develop a regional surface watt 8 management system which crosses jurisdictions boundaries and identifies and prioritizes 9 program elements and capital improvements ne;eccary to accommodate growth and protc 1.0 the natural and build environment. The GMPC shall develop and recommend a financin 11 and implementation strategy to meet this need. 12 CO-5. Water supply shall be regionally coordinated to provide a reliable econon 13 source of water and to provide mutual aid to and between all agencies and purveyors. 14 The region should work toward a mechanism to address the long-term regional water 15 demand needs of all agencies and water purveyors. 16 CO-6. Aggressive conservation efforts shall be implemented to address the need 1 for adequate supply for electrical energy and water resources, protect natural resources, 18 and achieve improved air quality. Efforts shall include, but not be limited to, public edt 19 cation. water reuse and reclamation, landscaping which uses native and drought-resistant 20 plants and other strategies to reduce water consumption, small lot size, low-flow 21 showerheads. conservation credits, and energy efficiency incentives in new and existing 22 buildings. 23 CO-7. Water reuse and reclamation shall be encouraged, especially for large 24 ; commercial and residential developments, and for high water users such as parks, schoo 25 golf courses. and locks. 26 CO-8. When planning for the future demand on wastewater treatment and 27 conveyance. alternatives to the expansion of the Metro centralized system such as 28 decentralized treatment and other treatment technologies, and wastewater reclamation an 29 reuse shall be identified and incorporated into plans as viable options. . 30 CO-9. The presence of tightline sewers or availability of sewer pipeline capacity 31 and water supply above what is required to meet local needs shall not be used to justify 32 . development counter to the countywide policies, and any such land use development 33 proposal shall be denied by the permitting agency. cppph2. 07/19/94 •68 B. 'Urban Areas Identified for Growth for the Next Ten Years 2 The designation of the Urban Growth Area establishes the service area for the 3 counry. The detailed arrangement and timing of services and the installation of 4 infrastructure improvements is left to be determined through shorter-term capital 5 improvement plans. To support the densities and land uses of urban areas identified fo) 6 immediate development, urban water and sewer systems are essential to support growth 7 anticipated in the Urban Area over the next ten years. Urban water systems are define, 8 as a network of pipes which are designed to meet all user needs and provide fire . 9 protection. Urban sewer systems are defined as a system of pipes providing conveyance i o a sewage treatment facility. 11 1. Urban Water and Sewer Systems Required 12 CO-10. In the Urban Area identified for growth within the next ten years, urbai 13 water and sewer systems are preferred for new construction on existing lots and shall be 14 required for new subdivisions. However, existing septic systems, private wells, and/or 15 small water systems may continue to serve the developments so long as densities and 16 physical conditions are appropriate, the systems are allowed by the relevant jurisdiction 17 .and management keeps the systems operating properly and safely. 18 C. Urban Areas Designated for Growth Beyond 2002 19 In urban areas designated.for growth beyond 2002, there will be a mix of existir. 20 services which nrav or may not he at urban service levels. The appropriate infrastructu 21 impro►•ernrnt.► for sewer and water .systems will vary according to existing site condition 22 Nett. developments should occur contiguous to existing,.fully-developed areas so that 23 extension of service) occurs in an orderly and cosi-effective manner. 24 1. Phased and Cost Effective Extension of Urban Water and Sewer System 25 CO-I I . To the extent practicable, all new plats shall be contiguous to the areas 26 identified for growth for the next ten years. The phased expansion should respect basic 27 . boundaries or other natural landscape features. 28 CO-12. Preferred sewer and water systems in areas designated for growth beyo 29 2002 are community drainfields and water systems which are professionally managed. 30 These systems shall be designed, sited, and built to facilitate eventual conversion to urb 31 sewer and water systems. Jurisdictions shall require all.known and projected costs of 32 , infrastructure improvement to urban service levels be funded at the permitting stage. 33 CO-13. Urban sewer system extensions in unincorporated King County shall be cppph2. 07/19/94 69 j- tea. -- ... 1 permitted consistent with the provisions of the King County Sewerage General Plan, 2 countywide policies, and the policies of the jurisdiction in whose potential annexation area 3 the extension is proposed. 4 D. Rural Areas and Resource Lands 5 Residents in rural areas and resource lands need to have many of the same types of 6 services as urban areas. However, the service standards in rural areas and resource 7 lands are not at Urban levels. Rural water systems are defined as individual or 8 community wells or piped water systems designed to meet all user needs but, in most 9 cases, not providing for fire protection. 10 1. Limited Extension of Urban Water and Sewer Systems 11 CO-14. Sewer expansion shall not occur in rural areas and resource lands except 12 where needed to address specific health and safety problems threatening structures 13 permitted before July 1, 1992 or the needs of public facilities such as schools. Sewers 14 may be extended only if they are tightlined and only after a finding is made that no 15 alternative technologies are feasible. Mechanisms to reduce cost and limit the number of 16 individual hookups shall be explored and actions recommended to the GMPC. 17 CO-15. ((Urban water 18 19 20 21 ex-teits-iefl-:)) Urban water system extensions are not preferred in rural areas. However, 22 Group A (WAC 246,290,020) water systems are permissible under the following criteria: 23 a((e)). Water quality or quantity problems.of.eXistinilysteinijii.:16fDOiribei 24 31. 1994. that threaten public health ((ex h)) can best be solved by Group A service: 25 or ((sue)) 26 b((a)). Group A service is financially feasible at rural densities and shall not be 27 justification for any increase in residential density; a prior to approval, the specific number 28 of rural connections shall be specified for the line or system for the (( )) _total rural area 29 being served: and ((b. Tythe area has either been approved for Group A service through a 30 King County-adopted coordinated water system plan or has been designated for Group A 31 service through prior establishment of a utility local improvement district or other financial 32 mechanisms(()), 33 (( 34 CO-16. b cppph2. 07/19/94:amend 8/15/94 70 • Noe 'owe 2 • 3 R t l water systems sh 1 be provided through private wells or small public systems. Ir 4 the Rural Area. all new ((fie)) Gi D<A water systems should be (rimpeeteeN water system operator 5 � a ((Iseeftsei�)) � Y v.. ..... th..r EUlhit ellSs. If the ares 6 overse�rt by die+c4-uttY.tc� eat~zt�'th� � �::...•c:.. .e 7 t lie served is included in the planning area of an existing water purveyor as identified in 8 Coordinated Water System Plan, the water system (f )) h be operated by the 9 purveyor through either satellite management arrangement or by direct service. 1 0 VII. SITING PUBLIC CAPITAL FACILITIES OF A COUNTYWIDE Or 11 STATEWIDE NATURE 12 Public capital facilities of a countywide or statewide nature generally have 13 characteristics that make these facilities extremely difficult to site. Such characteristics 14 include the number of jurisdictions affected or served by the facility, the size of the 15 facility, and the facility's potential adverse impacts, such as noise, odor, traffic, and 16 pollution generation. The,facilities can be either desirable or undesirable to jurisdictions. 17 Some of the facilities are privately owned and regulated by public entities. Facilities also 18 can be owned by the state and used by residents from throughout the state, such as 19 universities and their branch campuses. 2 0 The county and the cities need to develop u process for siting public capital 21 facilities with these types of characteristics, including but not limited to, utility and 22 transportation corridors, airports, wastewater treatment plants, solid waste landfills, 2 3 higher educational.facilities, correctional and in-patient treatment facilities and energy- 2 4 generating.facilities. 25 FW-((28))32. Public capital facilities of a countywide or statewide nature shall be 2 6 sited to support the countywide land use pattern, support economic activities, mitigate 27 environmental impacts, provide amenities or incentives, and minimize public costs. 28 Amenities or incentives shall be provided to neighborhoods/jurisdictions in which facilities 29 are sited. Facilities must be prioritized, coordinated, planned, and sited through an 3 0 interjurisdictional process established by the GMPC or its successor. 31 S-1. The Growth Management Planning Council or its successor shall establish a 32 process by which all jurisdictions shall cooperatively site public capital facilities of a 3 3 countywide or statewide nature. The process shall include: 3 4 a. A definition of these facilities; 3 5 b. An inventory of existing and future facilities; cppph2. 07/19/94:amend 8/15/94 71 1 c: Economic and other incentives to jurisdictions receiving facilities; 2 • d. A public involvement strategy; 3 e. Assurance that the environment and public health and safety are protected • 4 and . • 5 f. A consideration of alternatives to the facility, including decentralization, 6 demand management, and other strategies. 7 VIII. ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT (( ) 8 Jurisdictions should cooperatively create an environment which sustains the 9 economic ►itality of the region and which contributes to manageable economic growth. 10 Jurisdictions shall recognize that King County is part of a larger regional economy, whit 11 is strongly linked by trade to the national and international economies. Infrastructure 12 investments should be focused into urban centers and manufacturing/industrial centers 13 which are supported by transit. Countywide policies shall be integrated with economic 14 development. 15 FW-((39)) 3. All jurisdictions shall contribute to the economic sustainability of 16 the county in a manner which supports the countywide land use pattern. This is to be 17 accomplished by providing cost-efficient quality.infrastructure and public services at an 18 adopted level-of-service specific to the local situation, providing affordable housing, 19 promoting excellence in education, and protecting the environment. 20 FW-((39))34. All jurisdictions shall act to increase work training and job 21 opportunities for all residents and communities. 22 FW-044))35. All jurisdictions shall support the development of a regional 2 3 economic development strategy consistent with the countywide land use pattern. 2 4 Definition of Economic Development 2 5 Economic Development is growth and change in the economy whereby the 2 6 economic health of the region--its people. its business. its governments--is enhanced. A 2 7 important component of achieving Economic Development is through thepurposeful 2 8 rrndenakinc' of public and private actions designed to achieve: 2 9 --the maintenance of a strong economic base: 3 0 --a diversification of the economy: 31 --improved lob training and educational opportunities: 3 2 --the protection of the natural environment: • 3 3 --the empowerment of economically disadvantaged citizens and neiehhorhnnds. cppph22. 07/19/94 72 11 `-± 1 --a partnership between the nrivate and public sectors: 2 —the maintenance and creation ofhgtur lfarnilvi wee jobs. 3 This element of the Countywide Planning Policies is intended to provide a vision 4 . • and policy direction for Kine County jurisdictions. . 5 FW-36. The Growth Mana1'ement Plannin. Council orits succor and'Iris- , 6 diction shall develop monitoring and evaluation s ms. including benchmarks, by whit 7 they can evaluate performance in_achievi_ngihe_goals of their Comprehensive Plans. s (( )) 9 ED-1. ((By December 1, 1992,)) The GMPC ((semi)) has adopted Economic 1 o Development policies which: 11 a. Establish the county's role in the regional economy; 12 b. Maintain a strong economic base within King County; 13 c. Encourage diversification of the economy; 14 d. Maintain an adequate supply of land to support future economic 1= development: 16 e. identify geographic areas to target public resources promoting econom: - development: 1 s 1.. Foster job training opportunities to maintain a highly educated work 19 force: 2 0 g Protect the natural environment as a key economic value in this region 21 h. Consider the special needs of economically disadvantaged citizens and neighborhood. • 22 and 23 t. Include the assistance of private sector. 24 ED-2. By July 1 . 1995((3)) regional planning shall produce a regional industrial 25 siting policy based on a regional assessment of the need for industrial zoned land and the 26 availability of transportation and other infrastructure to serve it. 27 ED-3. Jurisdictions' comprehensive plans shall include economic development 28 policies. These policies shall address the local economic concerns of each jurisdiction 29 within the context of a regional economic development strategy. 30 ED-4. Each jurisdiction's comprehensive plan shall include an economic 31 development element which will include an estimate of the type and number of jobs to b 32 . accommodated in the jurisdiction during the next 20 years. 33 ED-5. The county shall work with Snohomish and Pierce Counties to develop a cppph2. 07/19/94 73 11AL1.ö joint 20-year regional economic development strategy. 2 1. Strengthen, Expand, and Diversify the Economy 3 ED-6. Local jurisdictions plans shall include uolicies that actively support the 4 • retention and expansion sifthe.tr.onomic bass of the multicounty region. Local 5 jurisdictions and the County shall work cooperatively on a regional basis and invite priv2 6 Sector participation to evaluate the trends opportunities and weaknesses of the existing 7 economy and to analyze the economic needs of key industries. 8 Local jurisdictions' comprehensive plans shall include policies intended to foster: 9 a, the development and retention of those businesses and industries which 1 o export their goods and services outside the region, These businesses and industries are 11 critical to the economic strength and diversification of the economy; 12 b. a business climate which is supportive of business formation.expansio 12 and retention and recognizes the importance of small businesses in creating new jobs. 14 ED-7. Jurisdictions shall cooperate to establish economic diversification and de\elonment goals for the multicounty region. Jurisdictions shall, in process of 16 comprehensive planning. identify the contribution they will make to the regional diversi- - rication and development goals. 16 ED-8 Where appropriate, jurisdictions' plans shall include policies intended to 1 9 attract and retain industries, firms and jobs. within their locally determined or zoned 20 manufacturing and industrial areas. 21 ED-9 Jurisdictions shall recognize businesses, facilities. and institutions within 2 2 their boundaries that provide opportunities to maintain economic stability and realize 2 economic growth for the entire region. These include major educational facilities, 24 research institutions, health care facilities, high value added manufacturing facilities and 25 port facilities anion8 others. The County and local jurisdictions shall encourage these 26 institutions, businesses and facilities to thrive while maintaining the environmental and 27 . other goals of the local comprehensive plans. 28 2. Environment 29 ED-l0. Jurisdictions shall adopt economic development and other policies which 30 will recognize and help protect the environment as a key economic value in the region. 31 Local policies shall seek to achieve an appropriate balance between the needs for 32 . economic growth and the need for protecting the environment. Local governments are 33 encouraged to look for ways to work cooperatively with businesses to help them comply cppph2. 07/19/94 74 11hItti 1 with environmental regulations and to develop policies that result in environmental 2 protection throh regulatory processes that are understandable and efficient. 3 ED-11 in coograiion with water and electricity v oviders. local jurisdictions. 4. jncludine sewer and water d.istri_cts. shall enciurage programs for water and power 5 conservation in..public facilities and in the private sector. 6 3. Human Resources: Economically Disadvantaged Citizens and 7 • Neighborhoods, Job Training and Education 8 • ED-12. Jurisdictions' comprehensive plans shall address the historic disparity in 9 income and employment opportunities for minorities, women and economidally io disadvantaged individuals. Jurisdictions shall develop strategies and support comm unity- 1 based actions to involve minorities, women and economically disadvantaged individuals i 12 improving their economic future. The plans shall recognize their special needs and each 13 jurisdiction should commit. based on their plans. resources in human services. communit 14 development. housing. economic development and the public infrastructure, to address th 1. inequalities referred to above. 16 ED-13. Job training. retraining, and educational opportunities are critical to 17 develop and maintain a highly skilled workforce. Jurisdictions shall cooperate in efforts 18 to meet these training and educational needs on a countywide basis by facilitating the 19 implementation of programs to meet the educational and training needs and to identify 20 partnerships and funding opportunities where appropriate. 21 4. Direct Governmental Actions: Land Supply, Infrastructure, and 22 Permitting 23 ED- 14. Jurisdictions shall cooperate on a countywide basis to inventory. plan for 24 and monitor the land supply for commercial, industrial, institutional, resource and 25 residential uses. Local jurisdictions shall, in five year increments, for the next 20 years 26 identity the amount, character and uses of land needed to achieve the jurisdictions'job growth goals; 28 ED-15. Local comprehensive plans should include policies which foster a climate 29 supportive of the siting needs of industrial users and that recognize the important role th( 30 play in creating high-wagejobs. Local plans are encouraged to include policies designee 31 to ensure that industrial use of industrial-zone land is not unduly encroached upon or 32 limited by non-supporting or incompatible uses. 33 Local policies and plans are encouraged to support the continued availability of cppph2. 07/19/94 75 11446 . 1 )and for those industrial and sunnortine or compatible activities dependent on critical 2 infrastructure as_identified in local comprehensive plans. Jurisdictions should consider 3 zoning or other means to Provide opportunities for those uses in areas where infrastructut 4 . facilities can be utilized to exploit the economic benefit of that infrastructure. 5 ED-16. Jurisdictions are encouraged to promote the shin;'of resource-based and 6 agricultural-based industrial activities close AO the location of the natural resource whethe 7 outside or inside the urban growth boundary, Jurisdictions are encouraged to recognize • 8 forest land as a sustainable economic resource. 9 ED-17. Where jurisdictions, including water and sewer districts, have 3.o responsibility to provide infrastructure and/or services or to plan for them they shall 11 include the Foals of economic development as an important Part of their decision making 12 process. 13 ED-18. Jurisdictions shall cooperatively develop funding_strategies for 14 governmental infrastructure which take into account economic development goals. and 15 consider the costs and benefits for the jurisdictions. and the region. 16 ED-19. Jurisdictions,shall seek state legislative approval of state funding and 17 regulatory strategies to fund environmental clean-up of industrial sites. Jurisdictions shal 1s work together on a collaborative basis to develop alternative local, county and state 19 financing and regulatory strategies to assist with the funding of environmental clean-up o 20 industrial sites. 21 ED-20 Jurisdictions shall identify geographic areas that can be developed or 22 redeveloped into manufacturing/industrial areas, and coordinate with utility providers to 23 build the necessary infrastructure. Jurisdictions are encouraged to provide public 24 incentives to promote basic employment associated with manufacturing,. 25 ED-21 . To maintain the economic vitality of King County, regulatory reform mu 26 occur with the implementation of GMA requirements. To-carry out this goal,,jurisdictio 27 .shall adopt permitting processes with defined milestones for prompt approval of projects 28 that conform with the local jurisdictions development regulations. To carry out this 29 policy the following actions shall be taken: 30 a. No later than January 1996jurisdictions shall identify to the GMPC o. 31 its successor current permit process timeframes and barriers to speedy Permit approval, 32 .including discussion of operational and cost considerations. 33 b. Eliminate redundant permit reviews and appeals; cppph2. 07/I9/94 76 e _i • 1 . Establishing consistent mitigation requirements containing clear stan- 2 dards. and facilitating projects that meet these established standards; 3 .Focusing the scone of public appcaLtirocesses_for a project to those 4 issues that'relate•directly to.specific impacts of the project: and 5 e. AdoDtin D edurrs to perform cpncurrent permit review whenever 6 possible. 7 ED-22. Jurisdictions may prepare non t environmental impact statements tc 8 address. in a comprehensive manner. the prbabie significant adverse impacts of future 9 development. 1 o ED-23. Jurisdictions arc encouraged to establish a master utility permit process it 11 conjunction with approval of land use permits such as short plats. subdivisions and maste 12 planned developments. Utilities may inch bath publicly and privately owned utilities 13 for electricity. natural gas. water. sanitary sewer, surface water management and 14 telecommunications. All utility extensions and required new construction may be 15 reviewed as part of the master utility permit. 16 5. Private/Public Partnerships 17 ED-24. Jurisdictions shall foster the development and use of private/public 18 partnerships to implement economic development policies. programs and_projects. 19 IX. REGIONAL FINANCE AND GOVERNANCE 20 ((&))A. Finance and Governance Plans 21 A -fiscal until •.cis is required by the GMA. The purpose of the fiscal analysis isjor 22 Kink' Counry /n realistically assess the fiscal costs and constraints of implementing the 23 CPP.f and thereby to contribute to the design of an effective strategy to overcome those 24 c 0rccrrainrc. . 25 26 . 27 . 28 pelit4es.)) 29 in order to evaluate the Fiscal Impacts of the initial Countywide Planning Policies 30 adopted by King County in 1992 and Phase 2 Amendments pursuant to GMA, and King 31 County Ordinance #10450. the GMPC created the Fiscal Impact Analysis and Economic 32 .Development (Fis/Ed) Task Force. The GMPC directed this Task Force to perform the 33 required fiscal analysis and recommend appropriate policies to the GMPC. The GMA cppph2. 07/19/94 r 11446 - 4 requires an analysis of the fiscal impacts to be completed when adopting countywide 2 planning policies King County Ordinance #10450 requires that an in-depth analysis be 3 conducted to evaluate the fiscal and economic impacts of the CPPs on governments, 4 businesses and individuals. The 1992 CPP Policy FW-32•reouires that jurisdictions 5 cooperatively identify regional funding sources and establish regional financing strategic; 6 Fiscal analysis of the CPPs contains discussion of anticipate fiscal impact_on the count 7 and cities. The Fis/Ed Task Force completed the work "2132E17rn adopted by the GMPC 8 accomplish the legal requirements for the fiscal analysis and transmitted their findings to 9 the GMPC in a Final Report on May 4. 1994. 1 o The Firscal Analysis, Chapters 1 through 8. of the Final Report of the Fiscal 11 Analysis and Economic Development Task Force which was transmitted to the GMPC o 12 May 4, 1994 is hereby incot9orated by reference as the Fiscal Analysis for the 13 Countywide Planning Policies, 14 FW-((36))f7. To implement the Countywide Planning Policies, jurisdictions shal 1 ; cooperatively identify regional funding sources and establish regional financing strategic; 16 b\ July I , l99((3))6. Such strategies shall consider the infrastructure and service needs 17 Urban Centers, Manufacturing Industrial Centers, Activity Areas, Business/Office Parks 18 other activity concentrations, and rural areas. Such strategies shall also provide incentiv 1 G to support the Countywide Planning Policies and should: 20 a. Make existing and newly identified funding sources respond in the mo: 21 flexible way to meet countywide needs: 22 b. Ensure that a balance of services is available countywide to meet, 23 among others. human service, public safety, open space and recreation, education, and 24 transportation needs: and 25 c. Evaluate current revenue and service demands and the potential for more 26 effective coordination of service delivery. 27 FW-38. In order to implement the Countywide Planning Policies, key investmer 28 need to be identified and implemented. Public resources shall include countywide, 29 regional. state and federal funds, King County and its cities shall develop a Regional 3 0 Financing Plan including sources for the key investments by July. 1996. 31 A. The Regional Financing Plan should establish priorities for regional 32 . infrastructure investments including transportation, water, sanitary sewer, storm water, 33 parks and open space. cppph.2. 07/t 9/94 78 11446 1 b. The Regional Financing Plan should emphasize strategies to achieve 2 environmental clean up evelo nt affordabl . housing and regulatory reform. 3 c. The Regional Financing Plan should consider The recommendations on 4 regional infrastructure investments which may be contained in the Foundations.for the 5 Future: Regional Economic Strategy Action Plan due out in late 1994. 6 • - d. Local jurisdictions' eligi ility for shared funding through regional agencie 7 and consortia shall be dependent uvon collaboration in develovment and exmution oflhi; 8 work program. 9 FW-39. In order to implement the Countywide Planning Policies, a Regional 1 o Governance Plan shall be adopted by King County and the cities. This plan shall be 11 developed in a collaborative process with local jurisdictions. special districts. citizens ant 12 business representing a broad range of stakeholders. This proposal shall: 13 a. Evaluate opportunities for government consolidation. 14 b. Match service responsibilities of jurisdictions with the fiscal capacity to 15 maintain services at the level desired by taxpayers: and 16 c. Define appropriate regional and local responsibilities for service delivery., 17 RF-l . King County and its cities shall seek authority from she State Legislature t 18 facilitate public sector assemblage of land for the purpose of redevelopment. 19 RF-2 King County and its cities shall seek authority from the State Legislature t 20 establish special 'Urban Center Districts" where increments of new revenues resulting 21 trom redevelopment can he allocated ((frlkiete€1)) for infrastructure financing. RF-? All jurisdictions shall adopt policies. to stimulate construction or 2 ' preservation of affordable housing in centers, infill and redevelopment areas. 24 RF-4 Each cit\ with a potential annexation area shall enter into an interlocal 25 agreement with the Count\ for defining service delivery responsibilities. A financing plz 26 for investments in the annexation areas shall be included in the interlocal agreement for 27 capital facilities and service delivery. Level-of-service standards and financial capacity 28 should be considered for each area, together with density issues and phasing of 29 developments. 30 RF-5. In order to transition governmental roles so that the cities become the 31 provider of local urban services and the county becomes the regional government 32 .providing countywide and rural services, unincorporated urban growth areas are 33 encouraged to annex or incorporate within the 20-year timeframe of these policies. To cppph2. 07/19/94 79 • • 0 err achieve this gaaL. all cities that have identified Potential annexation area shall enterinio 2 interlop] ahem is with King County that includes a lap for development standards 3 and financing of capital and operative expenditures during the period prior to annexation q . •• • 5 B. Implementation ((llnmplenment#eiflll and Transition 6 Countywide Planning Policies are intended to affect directly only local 7 comprehensive plops. However. the GMPC recognizes that. indirectly. Counrvwide 8 Planning Policies will ultimately have a broad ranging impact on zoning. existing uses. 9 lots and structures throughout the adoption of development regulations that are consister. 10 with local comprehensive plow. ills not possible to fashion on a countywide basis rule; 11 tf transition that will account for these impacts. Cities and the County need flexibili c 12 adopt rules that govern transition issues allowing local implementation to occur in an 13 orderly, fair and predictable manner. Anticipating. understanding and providing 14 reasonable rules to govern the conversion from old to new GMA plans and development rr I�llUt��1 c is hest addressed in local plans and development regulations. 16 TP-1 . All jurisdictions shall implement these countywide planning policies throw 17 adoption of comprehensive plans. Countywide planning policies will affect existing lega 18 7nnin2 uses, structures,and lots only through locally adopted development regulations the 19 are consistent with adopted comprehensive plans. 20 TP-2. Local plans and development regulations may provide rules of transition, 21 governing, such matters as zoning ((zefttg)) and existing legal uses. structures and lots, 22 including pending applications for development approval. cppph2. 07/19/94 80 • 11446 APPENDIX 1 2 Urban Growth Areas Map 3 4 This UGA map is a planning policy recommendation to be followed by the Metropolitan ` � ' 5 King County Council wfienit adopts the final Urban GrowthArea in its 1994 . ............................................. 6 Comprehensive:Plait, • cppph2. 07/19/94 81 ni 77. . . 7 7 z . . ., ...„, 1 ,J) r nC 9 -7 z I. �rLL'l P ; ; i'A./ 4; m ci1 V, Z ec U y 20 0 I 1 t ar. 0 C �2 T) ul �• s {d ri C ..(n 111111{{{111 • U a ^3T) I m Y+ T 3a Z N 7 j • 1 33 Z i. O . v . -...a.. .rf - • 1 ` aC- 1° anzm_I. J d� 77 : ...,_ � '..- A\ - -- ' 17-4-Q-5---'- ''.(-. ' 1 111) � /,/ �. S+. 20th Ave NEOz.� I mst24th Ave N-E1_ L ; 124i 4 NE( i � � {i 1> � - w-_i � L � � � . ► _�. . : , - ; . yea , CD ' i. - V ( IL ,.,,a..,....„ji co �.ng 0 /q1140th Ave NH /O ` �♦♦r�♦i♦;t $ L5. ti 4 v..l_ E \(p cp a r •.0c ti l O,' © : ;.:: ' _ _1. B1lt�!.. 3._�--_ �_._ '�.__ 74ateh Aw . ►♦. _ Z N • ,. Ri ,. ._1eeth,A ._Nt v:1drAti tii s '`�'�:_ ., .....� - ,- A v..($��.4.:•.0�f�♦�•��; :Q. +Jn / , 1 I ,• i �_._ r o:-O t»p !'.•O�/�`*Ite.•♦♦t♦t••w♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦'_♦•SS -• r r3 m ',<i♦ i ( py ,♦e♦♦♦♦♦♦•♦♦♦♦♦♦♦•♦♦♦♦♦•♦f♦♦►•♦♦♦•ie•i♦♦a y♦♦♦♦♦♦e; N #19' . '' 'n. i 1 / ' h •VinAtan ..,• .,t ._, .___CD { I -.'. .11 fin***********:.♦f•♦•♦t• '..-_ .. 1 ;: • / ,',•e.y . ='... _ •.♦♦♦••♦•♦•♦♦•♦♦♦♦♦•♦♦wei• ►♦♦ r ► , ... i41F !P tom• ' = ( 0.•0♦♦♦•0♦!♦♦000••♦♦0♦0♦• ••♦. �y • „ r •% / • r 3 ,♦i•♦'i i i i i♦i••oi i•♦•i i♦i♦i is•♦♦i i♦i i i!.•: take • 1 0oi�ii P`4♦D�•i♦'♦•i+i`i•i+ ♦��i►i►i��6•♦�i'it'• *:.♦• .•' Q�jjh �•,N "' `y • .0 1 •r • '►•♦♦0 ♦Q•••••♦i i i♦i i i i♦e i i�►i♦♦•♦•♦♦f•♦ohs:♦♦•♦•••♦•♦�'�:vi ii••♦••♦ I•ry .• '•• I t t►d♦i•♦44+:o♦♦♦♦♦O''♦o0♦ :'0o•••.r•11C.0•♦•4••♦•♦"00�•♦•Osoi•►4 o44♦•♦♦ ...1...,0 •k• J:>♦♦,♦i•4 L♦•♦i.4.�♦♦g'?I ♦♦o♦o•♦♦o♦♦oo♦♦♦►♦♦ooa♦♦♦♦o•+�4:♦♦q ♦0•♦♦♦`'►io♦ .-.%'♦eoi~ ♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦o♦,.♦♦os �� /..'....:.� • •1/i♦•a.•♦4-;�,��; ••Vt�•♦•♦•♦♦4♦♦tM♦♦♦♦ ♦♦♦f•�♦♦♦♦♦♦♦•fA�1•♦.W♦•♦♦�•••♦•♦•♦!♦t @•••-1♦�i♦•♦•♦•♦♦►♦4.'.,♦l[. .,♦♦•♦♦♦•.♦�•♦•♦1 ..�•♦♦♦ ►•ioi'%:♦0444i--•i♦•♦•o♦♦ai o4:4040oo♦oi',i1+.•♦t 1,000.0♦00•♦♦o�be�l�•o.14•o', 4••o o•.'•a:'•-.0000000♦0♦•♦.;t,►• •ioi i•�•i♦♦.: -,: ..• wwot e • b 000i"'ODi0o000.0.0.0i:!,Oo♦00.Oo0♦0i♦oi!•�:0♦•i i00000i0.0♦00o•♦°e• Ofiiiofif'f• •oi♦♦0.0♦0.0♦wi♦i♦i♦ii0ii0iio�s♦i Ih ry ►i•♦��•+00♦♦00♦0♦•!0♦0♦0♦0s0♦►o0••oA•0o0♦0.0�.a0e•0.0♦OOiooi0ioioiai00•oi0.00da '`�o.♦iins♦ii►i•0000ioi♦ii♦ioi♦%'♦♦ioioi♦♦•i0oo♦♦i00ai♦i•♦t _�„ 44 J� ►o.v. ,•♦ee00o••♦a•o♦+♦♦00:.•♦ee♦♦♦%0♦f000o0o•e♦ 0••_ ♦♦•e00♦0♦♦00♦+♦♦♦♦•♦ ♦ fo I ►•00<<�•�•i0oi0♦OaroA0�0i3Oy►oi0♦D0♦°•%A���0�0.0♦0a'%i0.0�0♦000♦0♦0roi0ii0i•.0oi♦ooioioioi�::5!+o•ioio�0i•�i0�o♦Roio�ooioii io�ooe•0�• 0♦0♦0oof ioi0d o0o0♦♦♦00 o O_!�O �i ��oi0o0io 40ioi o0♦0ioio♦fi0ioi!Oi�:s0♦0♦00►0♦0♦0♦0°♦♦fo♦•♦.0••0♦0♦oR o::Oi:'ioio♦♦oioioi0i i♦.• ' / � �♦oof0m•'►O00W♦a♦o♦¢0t•°ei`i°♦fi0i'•0•♦i +' ae��.♦00♦000♦♦0♦00♦0♦000♦0♦►o0etr�♦♦0♦♦♦♦0o0f0o♦a►♦0o0♦•0♦••.�♦♦•0•�♦0♦♦♦0♦►�,•0♦0♦o+♦♦0♦0♦0,♦♦. / A6 ♦♦i•0.0a c0o0o0♦•♦0♦00•4►0s0o°Ooo♦o♦°DOo♦!'►'e�0♦♦i!♦♦•0O♦♦♦0A0♦Oo•00i0♦•♦ ►i oo0i0♦0♦♦00♦0°o0O0♦o♦o♦'.�♦°♦Ooaofo0•Ooo i♦♦ii♦4�`soO►! - ........+.__.........._..I.... i? `R1 - °•♦• ♦•.4;♦♦••.♦•00♦♦0••♦0b•e%.e--. 0♦♦••0♦♦.>♦•0♦♦♦.6;4..0♦♦♦0 ♦..♦♦♦,,♦♦♦+♦••i.♦♦ g........_. ♦•♦=♦•♦•'�.•♦•♦••♦•••♦•♦••♦♦•♦a 0 o r• _ 0•�'♦0o0i°i•i00i ab0i♦ii0o0♦0o0ii0.0ioi:0:%'♦'i�►oi'♦♦i0♦•i0ii0:!i 4. j /a /,,►s0i•io*•o•"0��•�•i i0i'0♦♦•+♦i♦�014 i•♦+.4"0%0oi0ii♦i0i•►• .- �i--►�•i0ioi44.:444 i►ioi0i♦•oi e...."•.v.......40000 1 fs• . •:4544•0•♦00♦OOsO..♦♦• • ♦e 0.1k.g.ti! .,.►♦0♦♦•♦♦ ♦♦0♦o♦O♦ ►♦.0000♦♦00♦•• •0 r.�e!•••pfi♦♦I�••i•••♦•••••♦••••••♦>♦••♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦•♦♦�RR♦�1 RR f� - ►.♦•••♦♦1♦♦•••♦�••ti Y•Wiit♦0•9•••••A9♦•♦•••♦•♦•♦•••♦••••••�♦�••♦•t I .�e♦•N•♦t ♦♦ ♦♦♦4.4..♦O .. ••i•♦• Tr• r+•♦ ♦♦et►e1f♦•t♦♦♦♦e•♦♦ee♦♦e♦♦e♦e♦♦e •o••f♦e►••'►i►i•+0••••v♦•••♦o r i:•♦•� �♦♦ .•a••♦s••o♦♦♦e;�.•♦••♦♦•♦•o•oo•ot ;' ►•o•♦•t♦0e♦••♦t♦t•►♦0t♦000• ♦o♦. ♦♦• .••♦♦•o•♦♦♦•o♦.•♦♦o♦♦•o♦o♦♦•o♦♦ •♦♦.•.••••••♦•♦••.+♦•t 0.0+0 1 •++♦ 10 ♦0ioi00��.'000�0:4 0�♦�0�o�0a.�0000•►�0�0�0�0♦�♦�0�t♦0�k • 228t A vt S E Po 4••�.O•Av♦•••1►O.••�R�R•: +i♦i0i044.40•00♦0if 1 000♦•G r+3:0 0 0•♦••.00►0••♦♦0♦o♦0 0 0••0 00♦♦0• _....1� .....__._ _......._... .. "40. .0•.••♦•:••♦♦iO••• t 1 •♦0 ,., -..aT•+•••000.•00♦°•♦0♦0o•0♦♦i•0*4...♦♦ . >♦♦•• •••♦•♦♦••••♦•;•••0 . 0 Rom♦• •0=.0♦•.♦0•♦r.•♦♦••0♦00♦•s♦•0♦ •0••• t•♦••♦t•♦e000i♦••eef•it 1 .+���••t•♦000w•ee0♦0.0sf0w♦t:�0•••wa •e.♦•r00♦e♦•♦0+•••♦•♦••• • ••00♦♦••♦0•te♦!♦0e♦♦♦ ♦.♦•ft•0• ►0i�00�000�w0•�00.00•000•0......r0•00e00t 1 �e0.♦......a0000000•0•0000000....v00�f,.•000000♦00000000t �.. tr♦0•...„,••.• •boo♦♦♦• I i♦•♦♦♦♦♦•♦♦♦♦••w•♦e♦ew-♦• •♦♦♦ t,►•♦•°••i♦°♦e♦i••♦W► O4Itt•♦♦•`•••t't Y!•4• NE 1I �06OoP00 ♦0♦♦♦♦•0♦0♦♦0♦0♦•ooe0♦oo0♦o♦oOs►i�•:x.:i♦0♦0♦•0•♦ • ♦' ♦ewe♦♦♦♦••♦♦♦♦i''�•e•1•♦••• 1 �•♦♦•♦A♦♦♦ ♦•♦•♦•♦•♦•♦ei♦♦•♦•♦•♦••♦♦•f•!ei♦♦♦•ww♦•♦♦♦•♦♦•9•♦f♦•t .t .+�of e00o000♦•••0.00♦•0••o♦0as�ir,+i0♦•♦0♦•._._ 1 •..yi00o0♦•i o•♦•♦•00♦•♦000♦♦0♦•00♦o!o♦•i!0.0000♦o0♦i♦i•♦o00.0♦0 ••..♦♦•0e♦♦♦00♦0••0♦•♦•w0♦•♦ •w• • ♦••♦e•♦♦•♦♦•0♦00♦♦! f •eo0oeeoofe••oseee •o ♦.• ♦• ►•o0f000♦♦♦♦ ♦♦0♦•00.0♦0♦♦♦00♦♦♦0♦ + . - � r••0•e♦♦e♦••••♦♦•w♦0♦0000 ♦• .......♦• -- ♦.o+o••eo• ...-... ♦0♦♦♦♦°♦♦♦♦♦♦o♦♦♦♦♦00 ► ae•♦00•♦•♦ee♦••00w0o♦♦0:.:+ •♦♦♦♦♦♦•♦ •0e••� •.,••0♦w♦♦ •0•.•�.♦o•o.-e♦0w♦o♦:.: r !P .•0 r♦a: 0oi!i •i!•�wiOK ..;♦oi00000ioi000000i•♦ ♦•0.000.00♦00♦♦a♦W0 ♦000♦a of♦....._...._•_. o♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦00♦♦♦o o♦0 444 ►o0♦oi0i!,t-o•i 0•••♦•♦�•i i0• 0?♦0:::.::::::::::::$ 0♦0f♦e♦0••0e••it•►.x.) • , tS • • _O 1 O i• ••.... .4: • ;♦„I.-. 0�... i+�•. a���♦t♦i0:♦••�Oii0e00w•i0oiioi0e0•oO�0i•O�oii00�o�0. 0i :�♦�0�0�0�♦�0�0�0���e�• I ♦♦♦♦♦♦��ii♦io ♦♦00i� ::...... ►..�. ♦•l,:.. ........................... ...•.f.. ram' . ..... _ ►♦•♦♦•♦. ♦0♦♦ N••••:a•000 i000i i000♦000i00♦0♦0♦0♦0b0.0o0000000♦000♦000e♦♦0o hA A♦000♦.•00♦*♦ • Q C, • p p ..;. 0 O C a.. f "MAAAAAMAAAAAAAAAAAAA „MAW . .. ►D,,,••♦w•♦t; ►♦�►j♦•►•Awe••♦♦♦.,>Aw♦♦•►w♦e•♦♦e♦♦ee•♦ee♦♦e♦ee♦we♦••♦♦°eb♦•♦♦♦♦♦♦e♦♦eee♦ee♦e•♦ee♦♦� ♦•►♦♦♦ee•.y ' +♦ meN ♦♦♦•e•.e♦0••0♦♦0+••t0•o•o41,44 e♦s+efe•• ♦•0w 'b O • • • O C' • • C O; O C O '+♦•t♦o♦ •oo♦•♦t••o•♦.+♦0t•♦♦0♦♦••000•♦♦♦♦00•0♦•00•.♦0►•t. 5..- dt `r �iv♦0o0.0♦♦♦ •�044 e:4,4!♦♦0e;e0♦0o00♦•0♦.w0o.:44♦♦0♦0•♦i♦♦•♦0.0♦♦00♦0A•♦�00••♦0♦0♦♦$100♦.k • 1 •e♦•00•♦•T♦•.• 0.0••0♦. •♦f•+w00o•♦ee►♦•e♦••♦♦+00o•e00♦ �• ►♦00f♦•♦♦0•♦♦♦ .a•♦♦♦+ •f•♦e•0e••••••♦e•♦eeeof•0•• ♦♦* • • • .• r ►•ioiioii0ioio•iiiiii•.••►•i•ia°.�0Q0.0♦0.0i•0.0ii0••i•••i000••♦•i•O♦•ii�►!.000.0� • _ •f......_...._._.__._....._.. O O C y ♦••♦♦♦♦♦000•w•<••f e•_R�♦•e♦♦o♦wo♦o♦t0•e.0+ ** w•• ♦♦0•a ...-..__._�.. ►••♦•♦•O♦°ee••♦•♦•♦•wO•ts1!l�O.OA••�♦�0••♦O•oWe•♦•♦•A°bo♦•♦•••O!•♦•♦'♦•♦•♦•♦a•►O`r 1 Oi0♦��io•0i'i •i•♦•i�9 ►i00O00•♦0 0000000♦♦♦00♦i0c•►WO0*�000000.00e0000.0000d'00.00000.0000•►•0000♦e,w • 1 a O ',O i•00::�:::: ♦0•00♦0••: •..• • C C C ►0•♦♦♦0•♦♦♦00♦♦+'.f♦•f ♦♦♦♦•0••••♦o•♦♦••♦•♦♦•♦�" 1 •0•♦♦♦0•♦000' •• 1 ♦e♦e♦ ♦o+t♦♦♦• ♦owo♦ ♦••0♦«♦♦ ♦♦•00+♦♦00♦+ •♦♦♦♦♦00♦♦00� ►i0♦0a00!00♦000♦000♦•0• fi•000♦♦••4'•�•••00••e•••♦•4°♦•0•D0•♦t►0♦0♦000• 1. '`•••♦♦•♦4••♦•e•00•o.X..'.0 ' C ►• a'0►or t♦♦•::••:► ::••••4•a••••••.•�•/X w.0.•�•...♦ ♦'` •- h- • O •. •,.•0.:4:4L4/M.0♦0♦•♦t*,♦e♦0♦0♦e04 ►00,. w. O O o We*•••►•b0••♦•♦♦•♦o•e••♦♦•♦•♦e..e•'.•ae0r♦♦•i0 - --r-� - ++.•••••ww0w..er• • ♦ , �0e••0♦•••e4►•♦0e0eee0♦❖♦:4:4 a•••��♦•♦e•••0O♦•eO•e+••etOf°••00••e eee•♦fi'. 1 :s:O••i♦•i+�•O'ea0'�♦•>i�'.t. ►•♦ ___-. d i!e••R:4f?•0e i i.+**1.❖♦♦❖•••►••e•••♦•♦•••♦❖e e'►•• •❖•••f i•aj..._'�".....��I E• OI O 1. .,i.0♦e••♦e•e 0 0•+♦♦• ( ►'♦ nt .•,a+••eef0�•••: •♦a•♦00e• ♦•w0••+�f.♦0♦ '.r < ..t♦♦•♦e0♦0♦+e•♦♦0♦•♦. ••. ..r00iiiii0i!000000ii:is♦osi0iioifif•fe0.0ii0i 0i%f:•�•�•�••••♦•♦••♦ O<. O .O A j'., O 1•. .�♦000.0•♦♦000.0•s0♦000.000♦0i♦ifi�a • ♦♦♦ • O • O ,� • .':00e♦0e:•♦'0♦•e o♦00••0•:+:•♦+♦.:.:.:.:.:. ♦+:•♦••- i:•♦e•••0.0e••00.0•• y/ •''i'.:•44 s0•:•;•:•:••w•i•� - ►ioi• ►•i e•i0.0f0sO00i•00i00i000••Oi°ODi•OOi•ii`.•♦JO0•i•Ji 0 e•O•iiii•0ii••00i � -,2'00.000.0••�•e•♦000e0.�♦•00♦0♦0 •••`,, .. .• ♦• .♦+e♦♦•♦�0♦0•♦♦♦♦t•♦•♦0♦e♦o.+e••♦+0+00e+e0t0f♦ O O O O 1 `•q .♦♦•' ♦♦tVS ••ef•00•♦♦f♦es ♦o♦e••0oo•+♦.•ef♦!e♦w0++.••+••e•. .. • '-•♦•♦o♦•eo0•.♦00• ►• .•♦eo♦0o♦♦♦00♦ .'00♦00•♦0♦ ...••.•0%%i.v..•♦0f0ioi0o0?...0o•°'' ......00•e0.0♦ .....♦......•..'e••. ... 1 -->•=°0a e•.'�•0•••e•0•%1:0/0o0• ter! i♦o•♦0♦00w♦00!►o••i i i0ioi; 0o•o♦t♦♦»♦ •♦0♦0♦00♦0♦•♦♦♦fe ♦•♦o♦e►♦♦0♦e0000♦ 1 �•e:e♦♦000♦o♦♦w••• rr♦♦v0v e0♦♦♦0♦♦e•0•s0• ♦•oeoo•♦e♦ • v s ♦.•0♦♦00♦000♦00Ooo0000b0.00.0 O O' O Ch •. +0•♦•♦o**X1.Oo *:0:♦♦ r• p � ♦♦♦♦♦•♦•♦♦♦o♦ t tte••♦ 0• ♦•+:+000e••♦••♦•e•o♦♦ s?-.r0.0••-♦♦.•••00+♦eo♦♦0��e••f� i ♦•♦♦•♦•♦0♦00•♦♦♦ ♦e- ♦i♦•♦♦♦t• ♦•e♦iee♦e•••e••••♦•••♦•♦•ew••••••••e••e '• 1 /1�+••♦•�♦'♦'O••♦•♦♦♦♦e♦♦,w♦•e♦•a••e wwe•••••♦••♦••e•♦••♦••♦•�•♦♦ ♦e. ♦♦♦•♦♦e••♦e♦•♦ee♦♦eat♦♦•Ae♦♦♦e♦a a• �, ♦♦ • 0 O ,O -0.0i•,•♦o•♦•.•••000•••••0.0•••0••e O'' O O O� .0.•+♦•00.000.0ee•9e••000fi"+�•.°i000i•00i i♦00♦0i i i i0i�..•o' •r00i i r ioi♦i.i i0i ioi i i0o04.•0i •00••00ee♦00e♦•• ••••♦•e0t♦+•♦••e♦•oeftoe♦♦•♦•O0e►o♦ ♦♦♦s0000.00e+►0 - ti : t�.•o•♦•e e•.'. ��i•e••e•+• S •e+•e♦•: +♦•:♦••°•e•••••••♦•e♦+••♦••:•: ♦♦♦••♦••w••❖•♦♦♦♦w•♦.••♦•ee, ♦►•♦♦♦♦+♦••w♦•+•♦♦e+♦♦•oe♦•0•♦♦t �O O Q.._ �10if O O • ♦••• w 4♦♦♦ O O: • O •.••0!♦•000ee000e•0.0eoeee♦•0•♦0♦•0••♦ ♦0♦e00o.x.x. 0♦O �• ..OD. .'D'- �r•00.•0... ... � i ioi'ii0ii0i'ii°•0♦0iii•••ioii•••i0i0i0♦00o♦♦♦0+000.0♦000��.0.0•oa �♦00.0♦00000000♦♦0♦000•♦♦0♦•O`ii =' ._,��....1.1 .e•.,,r, -- J!0-•- -- .-. ..•>•••♦0♦.0♦0.0+♦efw•000w•••••0.e0R0f0♦0 0o00♦e •w♦♦♦♦ • ( , ♦••+i+♦♦o♦♦•r+ef+ew•♦••f00♦♦+♦�.ow•0•+ Es♦+•♦.+.S.00e0♦• O O O Ip OO • -'D 0 O lr:.i • .c'•?-: O y O :O • '►0•,•:y•a•••0i0+0o.•0♦0+0e00e0•0•e••°♦e0•e0.000♦•♦•X+0♦00•o'i0♦0••.•0•►0v4.44../ •f••o0•♦♦•0+♦°i ,", . •♦ /••.+♦•••0eee♦••♦0•••►0••+0.0♦0♦0♦•♦♦•eo•♦0♦ ♦00♦♦•00♦•♦ ♦0 ..♦�.♦♦••t•t•to♦♦♦♦0♦♦00••••♦•0+0♦••+o♦a•♦•♦00•.w♦s•00♦0o♦♦ •li ' „ - ♦ - •►�0:•�♦�. .�• +��•♦a►0R •0•••00•♦0e4•o o•00.0.0o000•i000.0000.0000•►000♦••00••♦00♦0•♦0o♦w♦o♦♦000o♦0ow♦0w+•♦♦%+ © J O O O O • �....._r •'�'O •�-+f++0 . ••+♦♦••+00•+•... ♦♦♦♦•♦♦♦••♦f44144$ ♦♦000♦♦••••♦ 4 _ /' ..•�•0• �.�+se++♦oee0.0.+♦0•••0♦♦•.e•o♦.0♦•♦0••000ww•• iw O . x-0•+•• .♦♦♦c•.,♦0040t*. ♦♦ae•♦f•♦••fw•0♦♦•0♦• x.:0ee♦we♦ • ��4 •.. . / ►- ►••••♦•♦•++•` ee•♦•e►••ef♦+••♦t•1•+•❖•♦•••••+•e°♦•♦•♦•+•••♦••°+•�+b•••b♦>•••+•+•�♦•••e•••e•+•ee•••♦•i•�••♦•• 'z O> • - 1 0 :o ...O._•.-._ O • --q, • .••'►♦♦0►♦♦♦t 0♦♦+00+0.♦•♦♦♦0+e e0♦0e0♦0♦•0e♦0••e eee0♦x.:.•♦O0••♦x.:.:w•000.0+•e000ee0••e+♦+0♦0♦•• n- f'D ti _- ..-".. 0 ^•♦if>+0i i°i0iei i i•ioi i0i`00♦0i i pall i o e ieiio i000i`i•♦fi0♦0o0♦0e i0.. +•0i•i i i i 0oi0 CA " A •Od o ►e►e•0•ee0+00♦•e0♦♦o0�0g♦► +0•!••00♦►0��♦e •0.0e♦ oee0♦ f ♦• O ,•0♦%��i%�i O♦iiii0i i OOREV, Oi ••O.,e°e+• • 0i'.��i+'iaJri!a�•w•oi±,iiAii*0ii0iijwiii�%i%�•i%iy%%h�`� % 0 00♦0�♦0♦�r.• Y v ,F w0e•t•♦0♦0•+0♦♦♦•0+•e00 + +•♦•••e' ' •0000 A •e• t • •♦ee it+00ttt• o0e00+•+•++t•f♦•♦ +t• O 3♦•••+.•♦.•0+•+••.•+♦•♦ .O O ♦ •♦Wi +♦+e••+•+♦♦e0•.+•0•��+ rt�•.•X0+0o•.f•ee00•♦A0•♦ ♦+•t•♦ •• l► _+♦•°•♦+f00f•.• •+♦• rt0.Oit•t.•t+♦0fw0e0•►•w•efee:. m ••♦e•.f•ee♦•0+wee••0♦ •+• twt • t'D _O+ewe♦•aw♦ee♦•i•♦we♦ • t♦♦••♦•w.•4••♦ee►+ 100tx+,♦•f•wi.• ♦ A•t♦♦o•w♦.♦••+ff♦♦ ►♦♦ ♦+.ef•+•••+•+•••e�•••••••+ew•i�e•♦•e•+•e•♦• ♦♦• ��• ►•++♦•+•••i••+e•••••♦~�r+•+•eee•••et:r•♦•ef►♦•♦♦w•+•♦-♦•♦•+•f•+•+•1•♦••'IS`+e e'er++eeetf♦•♦••♦❖•••••♦••`♦♦•ee_ •.•� _ w♦••••♦w• ►_A ♦♦♦f•♦♦o•♦**:* ♦ ♦f♦ •.♦♦♦ t•.-- ♦ft••+♦•♦♦t0eo♦•••♦♦•♦♦•►t•e+•t♦♦• ::::* •••.a♦♦f•♦ ♦ef•♦♦e+♦ ♦♦♦... • { �' fp e♦•♦+♦00�♦•♦♦.♦♦•f0♦+♦♦0•♦w••000� •♦r •♦•• •+00♦••t♦--••+♦+000••••0♦.♦•♦e'e♦ob00•♦•000♦Oi♦0000♦•0♦ ♦♦0•+• •!....... 000♦".•..♦......0w0♦t.4."4•♦•0•♦•0 ♦♦•"-•.O♦0e••••0•0••••0♦•••••00+•i' !••♦•o•♦•••♦•♦0i0♦0e ee0�/♦•0•♦•••:•i••o•41•♦.°0•♦0♦44!♦••0♦•♦•♦,•.o i0♦0i.*.. •♦•0•0•♦•♦•♦ n = . O rn A•••♦•A•••• '....0f ••e00.':: °0 eIl"i+•.:441:••0♦0•••0+0.•Ow0♦00000OOOts♦0e00400•0♦0♦0.00000400♦f♦ow♦.o•♦00o0•.A.01,p.1.♦w♦0♦♦♦♦0000♦0 ♦♦♦+.+.O•0. + W _ tf•f•••►•ff♦ ••••-• .••••••••°•+♦++♦We.of°•♦•►+ •....+•f•f+•++••••+•►•+♦•'>AAof•e♦ - ♦•♦♦•♦ 'D D •♦•e000:4•.!•e00•+•e14°.'••'♦0.0♦••••••e+e0+0•000.0AA4 0••O.Ooba.a00i'♦0♦0♦+♦+•t♦a•°♦o0°0e000•+♦tieO.e•°J♦eo0♦00°♦+00.0♦00e00 D ♦•0 i e♦ •••a O O. +0e•+♦t. .•. •0+•♦♦eee♦♦♦0f♦♦♦+♦•••.•tt♦♦00o0ee••••0•e•,•e0+�00♦••0♦e♦v ♦e•�•eto ••+�0t00.0tw•t00e• ♦♦♦ee0••t•+♦ ♦••e•e♦%•00o.•e•e•0f0♦♦ 3 Al E ♦e•.fte•. 0►+tt+t+•0f0+♦•♦t♦0• •0♦+a.0.0.0• +♦♦+♦0t♦♦e+♦e♦+e•+♦♦ ♦♦0•+• ♦+�0�0�+�o�0�e�s:• ♦+ •o+++o•-♦♦-4,--4 0�♦�+0+�,4,4"1"0.04�.►0�0AAA COOi f000000000000�•i�0:'OOw00ivvvv0 0• • ^* •♦t0••t•0 f0.•f♦+ •+••+•�•+•++♦♦+ff♦►fet0e0'�•••• !0♦•♦e•+w•f0e00efe♦ O• D. D ••♦•e♦•♦ ...S :_ •+♦♦•♦•••••♦••+•••••+•0•f0�e•♦•w•♦00•00••,+♦•♦++•►•0••0.O0r• °e•0+♦••0•0t000♦0•+•+0OOo4p•+•+0.0+•+•+.+•♦.+•. D D. > " 14, - O+0.4.4.4.4.4 ♦••••••.♦o••:+•O::.:♦.++o.+.o o o.+.+.♦.++o4:.o o.+++� .•��000.4o.0.e0.0.••`..4......x.0�o e•♦.x. ., ♦�o......**S.+�+ •°•00.:'.O♦O•♦:+.:41�0%...4+•••♦•••♦4 ♦♦•o•:44♦♦+e04••�0�0�01:44•♦•♦�♦•♦•••♦•♦�♦•: " f9 yC� O "`7 ....... 0 e•0 0.�♦. ++•+•♦•e0e•♦•A0♦0i'iO.O♦0O 0oi•O♦00000♦0Oe0.O•O00o0O0O0•♦0Oo0♦0♦OODi = O ; . D D: .. D.. ... ..-- --p• . .. ♦ �r.ef•ees++►OA••.♦ .. ♦�ee�w♦♦e•t D D �. r •.+e•0.0••••00•0•••40•••0•♦•••.• . . . f9 O r •w0♦•e+♦++►e0.0e•0♦ O � L9 v D I D D .. D D :e.LO••i♦i i0i♦+r•+i♦i♦t+f i0+ D D D D `" • -1 ' >. 0 O • D D D D .D > D D D D D D D `� O Q O D D > D D D D D D D D D D 3 ... ..- „'3 > > > > > > > > > > > > D D i CA �. ,.* �• I ►.+ = fD D D D D > D D D' D D D D D D , VD .rr. D D D D D D 1' > DF D :. ,.. D p D _ D_ .L1 . > , > D > > D • D > > > > D f Om O -'I G)o 33 r • 1 \ _ . - - 7DN a O O o'. _I_ Q Rif 3. Ow. ! i I 1 I ; ,-.1` r� Z b ! 1 c! CA i i R & i 0 flo t i 1: a c Z I i F 1fa L t, �I I. Q.; 3 3 Z m '" 23 Z v IS r _ uro �. : -0 •. • .r�. r -• Ave SE Cf' ' '~70 T - �►k �.. a. ,, I 8R Sl6 i ..- '3 Is % • F _._ 1. �•� - al, ♦1f a♦11♦B m ;N oor '.uLn�r:g a y�,, 405 ;ate ,, i J ioo }_--. ___ ttC1lf Aw SE 4. - \"'e I,_,,,., 1 m Ptos. 8tvd..SE '' 1� 1�7..2tA • NJ,._ Z _st 1yt`� m9sWr _ oft 1 y � f �'i Z 1 1 If 1 I i laZILA.,. f. ,Y� a� lid°�d 1 ca: d1♦••♦ 1404 Ave 8 ..;' - 1-?$@.Sh-Axe,$E,....._TWA.' ` 1 •m I :�s A4/s►e/ ♦P � O 0♦-•♦♦♦1♦••♦♦•♦♦♦• o n. 1 ♦a. �Sli►1:6 c• , ►T, ti .A\ 1 48t Ay BE �••♦• •♦♦1♦♦•••♦♦1/♦e. it I. ♦�/• I�a•I•�Di i♦i i` 00��'1 .. '...:�::_..!..; 1 h.._-... .-�•• -- •♦♦1e♦.•P♦♦♦• Al A!.14t•►•••4♦.:�,•♦♦••.. ♦ a•♦•:.:"♦...•• . •/4.•1♦ - •.-. tb►4:43e• 9•a!•e•DO44•••4•♦''z.- .:-� •- . :� f ��I •.1.11•♦9 ''•': • •444•♦1♦♦♦•-. •• ♦44•r♦•♦♦♦•.A91♦•♦•♦♦ - '� '-__..__. ••♦•♦<.•• •♦•►••♦4♦��4�.1• >41♦♦♦♦♦♦♦•♦♦4♦•♦• .•.r.•• ._ .... 4♦aCr�♦♦♦♦4•�..w►ibt r♦♦♦•♦•♦♦•♦4•♦a. fi: '• _ ..._ ..... f .. _... .......... •♦e4'w•1•.,^►♦e♦e♦/ ►•♦♦♦•4••♦1•••o4♦♦A >•• >♦a/n♦4♦1•♦•♦• t�re••♦:•♦•••♦•4•44- .!LP ,9 +� - e♦•�►1•//e♦•1•♦•i4id•�O•f•r•� ,w - L♦ .►1 • C C _ ♦♦4••••♦oA..•••♦♦♦♦•� '3--..+.�5 �••. •1♦1.s i♦•♦•eQ♦•♦•♦•4•.'. ,r '.," ►e'+•1e••♦•♦•♦••e, ♦♦e1e♦� :e1•►•♦a♦e♦•♦.•.•�e11♦e1.1.1.1e♦e♦•:' _,,...' ••.• • •s +'V� `r ea♦-1♦♦•111e/♦. •►b.•/•♦/. .♦♦. .♦40.40♦.•,+4♦♦♦♦•♦4. - . ._:z. Lake i ♦♦♦♦4♦4♦11♦41ir. _'♦1.` �•1/♦♦♦1♦//t ►/1/..... ♦♦♦♦♦♦1♦♦♦•♦1.•1/e+•- •: _�♦e1O U •4•♦•4•4a4e♦•♦e•*►1♦14•��.. ' :4•♦•♦0�♦e♦•:e♦•:•♦•♦•:•4•♦$i•♦♦♦•♦•;e♦e♦•♦•;•iei i•♦♦4•♦•�♦♦♦♦e••4•O�aiei boa•�e♦•O+• _t�T e♦ -. Q ••r♦4♦4♦•o4♦d•♦•e►o•♦::"; ♦4♦4 /4♦•♦•♦4♦Pi►►i44♦i i.�♦O/A•O♦e4••�• li.:1♦1•►4♦414♦414♦J•►♦•••••:::::Ca- a•/1♦be ,, % ''h(� +11♦♦♦♦♦♦►1•a. •••♦♦•♦1.1♦4♦ ,♦♦1♦♦a n♦NN♦♦♦/4♦♦-♦•♦+.. '. ` Y •♦♦•e♦1f♦4 v♦ ►♦•♦e♦♦♦e11♦N •+♦ee•♦ ••e•♦♦♦ee•♦•e♦♦e.a r J 4+♦•♦•♦•ae1•1•4•C►i ♦♦•♦C a 4•♦•♦1♦•♦•♦♦1♦•44♦1♦41.4♦♦•4♦♦/ •♦1♦♦♦ ♦♦•.1♦♦•1•♦♦♦♦1♦♦♦ : n •4 ♦'l ` ♦•♦♦.•4e•11♦/.•♦►•r1•i♦♦•♦/0./♦ea ♦1/♦♦.•♦1••a/a♦/104•/♦0♦1•♦ ♦♦•••4♦•9♦14♦1�♦•*'.r•►.'♦�►•e♦♦♦1/ -..♦♦♦e1•♦•♦4Ae ♦♦ ♦•1A•e♦♦••4 1 .:. r .- �, ••' P :+:0Oai°."•®isi•ibi!Oioi°i ia►poi*i••`.e♦"i oar croese•.�,•c�.»:4.0o1♦••A•oo•o•.•.1oA•s••o♦eileob/o♦♦1o♦oeo♦♦1o♦•♦.1oes � •• •-a'o [ -'`tj' ••►e♦♦♦.•• •♦//♦•4.e4•.e♦•.•4•♦♦/♦••/♦♦♦.♦/1ea♦•01•.•04•♦1s♦ -. r J/ •k• •♦.1./1♦o1♦♦oe. ►♦•♦♦♦//♦///•.w>0/a4♦♦i►•1•♦/0♦• }e1♦♦••♦♦♦♦e♦♦ ,r. :' _ "s•�•:•49?•.•.►.•:•:•.•a�:a•�•�1�1:1:♦:1�1�4�:�,�.••••14♦♦♦•7T•♦♦♦♦♦e.. 0*•♦1 e114•e♦111.. e♦ ►}•1•••••♦•1•!'Y�►♦♦P•4•♦e♦:•a�1•1• .*-;-*V4.1•♦•••�1a•••••••••••••••••Me••••�e�e•/♦•�e.•4%•1•/�•:4":•e•ej♦••••••••j1•••'1,•e 4y', ♦i,•� ��1 ►°♦♦/♦,v/•♦♦•n♦ ♦♦•.•♦•♦♦♦••♦•♦•♦••e:•• •1♦♦••.A ♦••/♦ee/•1//•�.. �4' / ♦♦♦•♦•.•♦•.♦♦1♦1�•♦i/♦♦♦♦••♦Fif♦♦♦♦1/♦1s•♦1♦♦4♦1/•a.�1♦♦1♦ee14♦ w /, '-� G, i •ij ♦♦♦ i••♦♦♦♦♦•♦.♦_. Ve♦•♦♦•4♦♦♦/♦♦4•♦♦♦•1•♦♦•e.,a•a/♦♦•❖♦♦/e •• •• - I. • •1.••1.0♦a1♦/>.♦./•►-♦/♦♦•♦//♦•/♦a1♦♦•♦♦.1/e♦•a:.b•1•e/e••/♦ lilaof 4° -- -b. y ( '♦•.y�,.N•••❖o•♦•o°♦=o••►•♦••••' ,♦••••o♦•••♦•♦.�♦�1♦e•♦❖•4.4•♦••♦1♦♦♦•♦♦1♦♦4,�4♦e4e4♦♦♦4♦1♦414♦4♦1♦♦14♦• ., _ ,.� ♦ ♦4♦.•.4♦•//1♦♦/•4♦•1,•♦•1•♦♦/♦♦♦••4.d4♦••••414V0%%%•••/••♦ee• , ..j+.►i,i� ,.b c • / .... A••♦•♦•♦•♦•♦•♦••, ;o♦v.. ►.......t•♦•♦•4•♦•♦•••♦•♦•♦•♦••••♦♦•♦ye. v..,"ye..♦••••♦••ee♦•e.• , , t•• _ _ifay..i �� d�•G / 1 •1••d•••♦•o o•♦••• d•♦•e•♦•41•w'1♦••♦e♦/♦eo•1•♦•♦♦o•••e e•/•♦••e♦e•♦••e♦•OP•41.,•••e•♦••♦14•Aee•••1A.• ' r. •. • .t,_ c' 4„� ..._ ./ - .. .... - •....•..4}•e♦a•e♦1♦•d♦/4♦♦e♦♦e♦d♦e•e♦eee♦bse ////♦♦e•e♦♦ ✓ ♦1♦♦•••1.1/a♦.♦•/1♦1♦•/♦♦♦•♦//•/♦♦/•♦1♦♦10•/1••♦1♦•111♦♦r � -,..1:. m i � �•.•.••♦;.•i i'.•i i a1i i i ie♦sr iei i°S►i i1�•i3ie•••••••♦i►i i i ieiei�Pioi iei i iei ieiei•ieiei i s.ei• . ;{y aR� �N I ,Q •e•♦ee.•.t•.♦•.e a♦e•t•►•♦•1e e♦e/1.4/♦♦e4a��•t�eebeee♦♦♦e♦ee1•e♦eee♦♦♦•4•••♦eeeea�4••4eee♦4♦e♦♦ebe♦♦1e•e4e•/•e♦ee• .r N•-. . 4 , b I .�ne•♦o•♦e•►♦A•os9.eoo°,4e♦eo4o•eeo♦oe♦e♦1..o♦04♦0••♦♦♦♦♦♦• •..♦4e.♦.♦1.•4.•♦.0♦14w•♦a4♦♦./♦♦..1♦/.♦♦/a♦1•♦.1 /♦11♦• �. _ c _. ❖O.D•♦���••♦•.e.•.e/i�•e1iY�!•.4♦♦♦ee..,.1ee♦•.ee♦♦e•1.e.e♦♦.e1e♦♦Oe0••eead°♦e♦♦♦♦1�••.♦o ►1.. 7Q l V,' 1..°4°.+•♦♦4A•• .• •••♦••••♦e•,•,ee.V.•..• •..:.•es❖•❖♦;i a•de4•♦••♦••4•,••.•IV.,❖••� ,,t...•... .•i�ii♦iiii;♦``iii!,•iiii••d •iiiis�w••Pi•.,•ee•"i•+•i•.e♦ei!Oie++ii•i: :s 0 1�♦1 _ �y♦� •a �eQ�\ at 4144•a/1 4-.:4 ♦♦•♦ ♦•1♦♦•4 ♦14♦•/4•••♦♦4 .. .♦/e♦.4- - •./♦♦a C. dd �Yd �.�a♦♦e♦♦•1♦N•,♦••♦♦♦♦ •♦e11./r♦4♦1♦♦♦♦1A♦•♦♦♦ ♦♦ey11e �►♦••♦ •• •••.►♦je•?o♦ooado♦•••,y1.0♦010♦•♦o♦e1o1e♦♦♦•♦0♦o4oe♦♦♦♦•♦ •••a♦e♦♦♦e♦1♦••e1♦a�1114♦♦11♦1P♦9�1♦fie..: .4♦•1•11♦�I'i/a11q ►eeee� , 4 ••.♦♦♦,►,. .Q4•1e1♦♦♦1♦♦♦♦♦1♦♦►e♦P1♦♦4.1♦.♦1e♦♦111A �� ♦♦e'•• Y .. .e.�� •:4:4-♦a10 **:::••o'.•4•♦e000reodd♦••♦•O•d•.O•e•••O•4••!°4e00.1.Oe0'•eOO.ei�i!►� a .,:•••/•/•/e:.e♦ei •. iii�•e t.O♦•i o`.•••r:e•00•••4•OOOod•Oo•♦•s♦4••d••00•0•••••• �I%•4•4❖♦•♦4.do•♦•0♦/•• -i ♦•♦•♦•••• `►....• �♦001010 ♦•1o♦e.•.o/♦o�►♦e♦e1e♦•fe♦•1••040♦o♦o♦oe•4♦1•♦eee4o��i•♦♦i/+`i•e4•♦•♦•♦Qe♦•�•►♦e••.♦o♦o♦off D ,' ►.1♦♦ ♦♦♦••• ♦•••1 �♦♦•.••//♦4.♦►/1••♦♦♦♦♦0•♦11/♦♦•�+►•1♦•♦♦♦♦04♦.♦1♦ • 1 ♦1♦•• 1♦1•1♦, � mot► •....•'a♦•►♦1••♦14♦.♦♦a ♦41•♦.4♦1.4.4 •.♦4♦ ♦♦♦•♦1♦• ♦♦♦ ♦111• •►e•111♦ ' ♦♦♦♦♦.1•�1.♦►♦♦♦1♦44♦♦♦.1•v1♦♦ev.♦•♦♦1♦♦♦•1♦♦1.♦e ♦♦♦ I ♦ A e•• ♦11♦e♦e's,. ♦♦••♦♦♦ ♦ P/♦1♦♦♦.1♦•1♦.!♦♦/4a•w/4♦♦•♦•••♦♦e/♦ •/� +�•/ ►e11•,......,.e1. bdc+♦/••i'♦❖►♦♦♦/♦♦♦♦♦•1a♦41 .--. •♦•♦♦♦♦♦♦e♦1♦ .4 1 • ••e: :...e• � 1 N. ••.•♦♦ea•.♦.11e♦1o♦e♦•e•4•se s•+:• •••••♦••••e••1•• • + ♦r ♦♦..♦4 ♦►/♦.♦♦♦♦♦♦♦/a♦♦♦♦,iP♦:,.•-...•♦♦♦♦♦.•//•♦♦o• D DI ,r ♦♦ • a ♦♦♦♦N•ea/♦♦41♦/♦♦♦•...e.♦♦a• ♦/a.•♦/♦♦4•/e14 �• - Leo/ogee♦ _.�., ♦ �1♦ •♦•••.♦♦0♦♦,.10o♦♦o♦eer00:0..eeo_o•e♦••e1♦+♦ I :�/�t •♦ob♦•. •.•••♦/ ► • ♦♦1♦1♦♦♦♦P♦�•♦•1/4•,i.1.•.•.A• ♦♦1A♦-�•♦♦♦♦ I ♦♦♦.e♦a ►•♦•e♦e%1e1. ►/eye•�♦••11, ��►♦• ♦1.4.♦♦•♦♦4o♦•♦w..: .♦/4•44: ►44e•s-.•/4/♦ D D D r > •. ea • 1N• ♦ fD" ..♦••. ,♦/ ♦.1♦♦♦♦♦♦♦••♦♦ ••�/• ♦♦9a 1.♦♦.•..♦.♦•♦• ♦♦•/ • ♦ ♦ . •• ❖1s♦11a0/♦a♦♦o1♦4♦♦4 •a04/e•1/•P•••♦•e/ 1 .1/e♦♦' . ♦♦♦ •e♦1• .- � to.:... et. //♦.4♦♦/♦44v♦44♦♦♦♦t• d♦♦♦a�♦to:.x♦♦♦♦ I ♦♦e• •e. P •♦•♦11 •_ ♦./e...♦ e ♦ e♦/•4•♦♦.•041♦1♦♦. •41♦ •♦1••...♦♦♦♦♦ ► ♦♦lees•. ♦/1e11e1♦e•+ - . ye... ♦O•4♦Ov.•►:►�i♦iii''i`'b0•ieieii!' Oieiei ii`i�i:�•-��1.0�♦� 1 r Oi♦♦e/e ... //•111•111♦ 1•. ♦11.....♦e .... •••••4•4••,N x x.x i.v,. i i•4 x iei i 4•4♦i-�4.••.••. D �• D D A iii4i4�ie�•....... 4e4e4e4eei i4•i0e4eeieie i•eie4 i�!�U 1I. ►edOi4••i 44 i•♦♦••A•i_►♦4►•♦•♦O••t♦♦♦e♦♦i! ♦ee•♦•♦•♦e♦e♦...vt>♦•♦...4e 1 1A.dieeieieeee♦eiyeeie♦a .1x,ieee♦Abe♦•x •-i'+�:vel' ►eee♦♦♦♦:.:.::.♦ie ••-•a••e•• ♦, •♦♦♦♦♦•♦♦//••♦4♦♦ ♦e1`:�1AOAo oAo•♦oAo•1AOAOAOAOAOAOAAo oOAo�•►♦iAi ►4.ei.:•� ►•♦•e00•i000♦• 'i...•.�:. •t * --_- . ....4•♦.A/•//•e I /e,4♦/ed/e• •1♦♦•1♦♦/1�4•♦•r• •••••♦ •e•♦♦♦♦/e ♦♦1..•♦♦♦•:•► - ----. -4-- > ►/;.►a♦♦♦e♦•♦••d1•• •♦e4♦/1.1ee _•• 4 . ►•ee♦eeee♦ Oi i•i!�i4•i i i i• •- -?---� y� .♦.11•t c��1c� 1.•e•1•.�•�i4•❖••A••�•w�_�eer'.r: - •••••e•♦•••♦••••• ••♦•4•♦•♦•♦•••••♦•••/• •, 1 eei►♦••'•••••♦♦♦♦••♦e♦•1•1•e•♦e1e•1�e44.*:••%••:.$1 1 ?•3et••e••1e•e••A• , •♦A1.♦441♦ /e♦,♦♦♦♦♦e1e11e♦♦1♦.♦♦1e♦/♦1S. ♦♦•♦►1A1♦♦e•e♦ ♦♦1.40.•e•♦Y♦♦. D. ••._...._..... D D D D D i' > /♦ :♦: 1••0.:/•••♦•o:o�44.: 4" ot e••♦+4S.•:♦e•ei te•♦1•.Peei° ♦•••�e�1i••.. 11♦♦•♦♦1♦♦♦ ♦�•ee1♦ ♦ •♦♦e1♦♦e1♦♦ee•/11♦e••. Vie••: •♦.ems/♦i• ♦••♦•♦♦♦e•` ., I ♦.e♦ •eee♦1♦•oe/ee/ee♦.•eeelr♦. ••4:•VA /44ee •i•i•i•i•OieiOO•i•i 1 •iee •a iei•••ee••e•♦••.•.♦d•♦•e/•+e a❖4•ee♦••♦ieee. ��:iDieiei4sioi/oe�e�`:i�e1ei ♦0L♦41•♦00• s 1 ♦.?•♦♦♦•1/♦♦••♦♦♦4.1e••••/•/e •,,•i♦♦•1♦e♦•••♦/♦ •..•10//1♦a♦ p • •41.a •1/•♦a•1•♦•,•♦1101♦•/•►1•• .♦/♦.•a•1♦•♦.•o eo♦ ♦�•�•/i• i• i• i•••i• i• i 11♦♦•♦e. .. .�'I. D .. D.. ... D D . � . D o..•:0:•••�!ieS ieieie. ...ie-, ioieie4IWs• tsi -,.••••4•4•.•.•••X•••••••�•••%.� •♦♦♦♦•♦>♦♦•/❖•♦ 7 1 ♦1a♦••e♦♦•/1e1e/♦•e♦ee/11.1♦/♦ 4e/1♦♦1ee•/♦1♦♦ee♦ •♦•♦ei•♦e:44�0❖•♦•e•♦•♦•♦ f •iei .•••,..••••••❖•e..•♦•e%•4•••♦..x.♦ee••1• .i/♦♦•eix.••x..x..♦x.•♦e♦.x• ♦ee♦.♦•♦♦e♦e♦♦•♦ •/♦.e !.••/♦/♦♦♦110♦♦♦1♦1.♦♦11♦♦ 1.♦/♦♦ ♦/..1♦1//e/♦// D ♦•♦•♦e//r 1e/••♦♦•.e•x...•♦•♦♦ D D Al D r $4•beb••.1•♦•e•♦•e♦e♦/1•••//eee/♦•4/♦e4•1ee•/•ew.x.e• 114•e••e/•♦e♦•••e♦/•r•t/•♦•♦:e•♦•e•♦•e•♦ e111.♦♦1•►14.♦P♦1• ,,, \ ,: ' ♦.•♦•••..♦♦♦♦01•♦♦•/♦♦/.♦♦•♦e•••♦♦• ti.a►oeo•AOooeeA00eAee y ♦••/11♦ ♦•♦•/A10 . ^ „ /♦1♦•♦ ►1/♦ •♦.♦/••..•.1♦/♦ . ♦•e/ :♦♦ •1♦• ...x ;r 11•♦•♦♦•►OOOeO.:+:. •ei•O♦••' •Oo•Oo00•o oO0•o oO•Oo o o o•♦deoOADe oA• O. • r e♦ •♦•10♦♦ O . O O 4404 ►♦♦♦1♦1♦♦► D. D • D ; D D /•o•..►e•1oe♦e♦1//♦•e♦"%i". .♦♦ ♦ei .•idi• s0.Oi •�•♦°..►AOA•d0•♦A•eAOA••oo••A♦A•A1A♦•1de/•1de�•A•• /oboo ♦edd ed•�►o•e0 ' .t:. i^♦D AS'• 4,•••♦•♦❖♦•♦•••♦•••4••••❖♦•♦•4•♦•♦❖♦••••014.•e• ._.0..- a•♦•; O O_.. O"� O •... • 0••eAo•/dAo•♦Aie 004•i�Ar :DO••O♦0•000♦•OAe0000000000eA4ei►00 ' 1 L. i�1�1:•:4:♦:•�♦:1• . §. . 4%i i•i••.::',`iSi•i•i•i•i•:•:*:••:•:•:::•X.44x. •n O O_0 c O: • • O 1 . - :.wi':•ii•«Do•o�,�.�i�i••"iiiieier:•::+� i:•�oo��.co•4,, :.'� ' ♦4•♦♦♦♦4♦♦, •, ♦'4•♦•♦e♦•••.•/ra4.1►e' O 1 D 1 D. D P D,: D b •..4•♦♦♦♦4♦•.•♦a. ♦.•4♦♦111♦e•/ ♦•♦e••.P♦• o: v • O O �� ♦4••4• ♦❖♦•♦❖A°Ae••A•A••♦•••e•�i►•'•e•••••.d❖••.e.•.•e•Ae.•.eA�.•.e.•Aea, ,-2'7 ~ 4, • .•�••°•••�•►••♦•OO♦•OO••••••O♦•O♦T:•••••O•♦o♦•♦o♦e♦o♦•••••o•• ♦4►♦/♦/♦•41 O O ••.. V• 11b Q--:_1► D • D D D D D • D ••.••.♦••♦/♦••♦♦♦♦•►/•♦♦♦••♦♦♦♦♦/4•♦/♦/♦•♦♦♦♦•♦♦♦•••'C •a..•.♦./...♦.e1...:../.•.♦.♦... ♦• • • •. ♦♦♦►♦♦•♦♦e♦4a•4♦♦1/♦i'♦♦/e♦♦ ♦♦♦•.e♦e/• • ♦• .. _..♦ ♦.,1•••a♦0♦♦►e♦1a/♦/i♦♦/• ♦• ♦•i0a o�• /• •sb/♦•. ei0'1 • ► /eoo.P - . 1 O • •40001eiei�i•♦�.�Oi'/e.•i' '�DO00•e•Oei0e�e00�eODi►•ei0e•1si o��.1.eeei•.'.•ieiei . ° ♦♦eiiei•�• ♦♦iie♦ei•.• -._ D _ D D D .. D �. :• D • ir♦4♦♦•4•414 4'4IUII��II,IIii`;i11�►/t .ems 1�•♦e1ea1♦e♦oeooe♦o0o♦♦•o�o4e4e♦•♦eef;♦ee••••ea•••/ei=1/•♦/O • f.. •• a♦♦♦♦•••♦♦//$:::.♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦4♦••♦•. +.••e1e1/•♦♦••G/`I1.'I11111 It 111 fl�l►•9•. •♦•♦••❖•❖♦♦♦e•♦4••4•e•/•••♦��••►♦1•1e1e d•••♦•�♦.♦ a•eee••e••eA•e�e1♦♦•♦•♦•e4•♦,•e•e♦ •/♦•4•e♦1•i.1/ 1 I I.i11♦/♦1//♦♦♦w♦d♦ •1a••..��•�• • ♦• ♦.1♦♦♦♦y• .♦.a.�e0 �ee♦eea♦eo♦e•,1:;el 1 i .1 o►a♦•e1♦o1♦/ •♦�+,♦♦�.��♦.c .. i�0,,� ► o♦♦u4�•4e.•4,40a•.. •• d ' 'r'I'.'d•••4•.e ♦•• •4 ♦ /•�,►•!4, �� ♦ •Mi•4•i .♦.„ ,- ,i D C.- D D D • •........•-. . g/ 1 1 1 14`0.►•• .1 0•i••� ♦�•d•1 1••�••a• °ir ./•••• • 3 ,_a•I 11.1 1 ►•�goo ►goes♦ ♦•♦ ♦a♦ a♦♦'4a•.♦e. • e1/♦• ♦♦1• wti�k la .1 1 I Igoq.••Ig ol•►•e• �♦ ♦ ♦//♦►/•♦♦11.0•:••►/• • •4•❖ •- Ilpilnfoel•"•flg'.i'ii.a jIg11;i11•Il,ll;ip;a♦ ba♦ei1i.♦♦44♦ ♦♦4/•♦•• ,�./1►N♦♦.•/ P1••Igoal•••••goyl.lgg�• •♦•♦.••e♦1/♦•t:1♦♦• •♦ea/ .I a1.1•.a.1.Ao1�1;t4 AI a►• ►•,♦."•♦♦•4♦♦♦ ♦b•1f, ♦1♦♦♦ 1.1•4Ial.l••1.• 111 a.1••I.ga ••IV•.•O�e❖..•♦♦♦• 41/•• D D D ,. D D� D D 1►r1!'1liti:'i'1'4�}I;iliildllnl�:1': ►i.•••.11•oAOAO•Ao1oo�►1A•oS�oedoAOAOAeAeA > � I-y v: : . - 1 O 1 1 >1 a a 1 1 1 1°4 1 ' ,., 4 o:1+.e.�♦eA♦e♦♦•••4eeeee4;,a•P�e��e1♦�e4e♦/e/♦ ' �1._.... ,.. I .__: ' •♦ill•II.�I0 Iliil. 1 oIIIIo 11,i1ii1 1 a�•�y►e1.1♦••♦�♦4♦'•♦A��•�♦♦♦e♦•�1�•e a♦�1• n, . O ♦♦♦ ..If•1 1 r 1 1•1 . • 1• •1 • ♦♦• •••♦ et D D 1 D D D D D ♦e♦o♦oao4 •y/l 1;1 It�.� i►r•.,,o♦1• ♦•°c�1e11♦♦♦•♦ D 1 ^J _.. _. .... , ............ ...... .... ....... .....' ►.�q:ael�l�l�'� _. _ ... -: �.�1�1�,�te1•♦41♦ee4•�.��a�•�Vie♦♦e••♦e•a♦e e n • • ♦•♦♦•1 •a1. ♦1 ♦ ❖♦1♦1♦ 0-3 D 1 t D D D D D D D ••4•1w~eAe eAeAe• �oAe o e��a di i►idts�••♦A♦•♦•♦•1•e a eo eAe ed .•+ O / :�♦:♦:., s♦O�a�o�e�o�a�e�o►•�iy�e�ie�♦�o�e�okd•�♦�♦�e�ek; `� '-' 1 I 4.4►1.** i.0♦•♦•i•°:e••SDi`>•i.eo•♦•♦•♦•••♦•a♦♦•♦•�.o/e/ea et, ... 1>.-- •{>•.1 D . D • D° D D D at10♦• .. •♦•.44♦/•P••♦.•e♦♦*.44 ♦4 > .. ••• g D > • D D D D D 1 s i&e:>.•♦•0•♦ D 3 t- -Q ° O ►1♦AA♦♦♦e/♦ rs Qr t� -, r:l D D D. D D D D 1 r♦ • .-/. r. e-1 _ - I • • • 1 e ;' .: • ..Oeie44•4•4❖i0e0e•O _ ro •- O "O •♦e a♦dAA•♦ei a•C 1•/O > •••••♦•••%4♦♦•♦•,eb D_ .. D. .. .►T' ./1 �,;►, -. • ♦/♦•A♦./♦•► •: ' - •-•••••-' . ► = l , ♦11♦a1a4.4•a �•� ♦1N. � •//♦♦♦♦♦•♦/1/4♦♦• r. I•♦4• O Oiieiei•••o iei•0•iei♦i♦4•o?• i.o`A �1 i ►eoieiei /� C "� D „ > -0 iy > ♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦epobi o♦♦•♦e♦•♦••4••• d. . I: i r.t♦♦.•♦/ D R. D; U➢ 4 1 Q ° •♦•DO•• aO : 1e♦ ♦ D O. D - . D ; ' D 4♦•••.d0.1•1 -/. 4- .r - +ed•oeoe'ie/e•:•:::eed••• I t •- O 4;0 _ Oo•••e•4i♦•iirr tidO0iiii♦ i0i P_ . od 1ee • • -' 11,/♦♦♦ ak = ❖O ••i•/a♦♦0♦ c ♦o0 ♦ e0d i -. <n o .> 7 D Od , •440d►•o• ooe oe❖oe4D D D > . I > ••e•♦♦0 d♦/d♦ •/O♦•0e♦•♦•/•♦♦•% r♦a.♦.♦.♦ A P /♦•i1s♦4••d••0°♦♦•a••%a/0♦♦ /♦1 • • sieAv•.e•••vee4 eiiei e.e.e•O•••••4r ,• f.•♦•/•• > > > D I,iI �„' C. `< A . e*:4„>♦.e•.e ♦e••/e/ e//♦/••e•♦ei .• •: •r 1.-.•1L/1a•♦L♦04Zie1i1%♦'•es•••♦41 (/1 S �"• `C iei♦eii.•Oiieiii•:Oii ♦/ei•.$•♦iP'•'.iii1 ♦ o�•♦ 10.0•.� tiffo D „ O - = nD D 4i♦iibioi.i •♦0i4i1i0i4i♦,.iai♦i . eiio e, ►•o D D D ' VD i •ie0ii s • II I . ♦ ea •' + � sc Aa • .�1• I �O -> 41a••./•♦•ia4♦♦••1i'ie♦tI ..I .•♦o•a •• r.;4,71. ►ODoes1O•ei4,4, D D D . A> ‘mn 0 I CI C .. ( N T ' li• H Cr. c 1 =• a �= c A hill - -I .: 6Ia 1:1 PE. -1 i ,_,,,---- 7 .711,! OO••• 1 . 1111rff ifi [ i ' l ., ...e.. .. 2 C1 rya -., C mL.,.. Gv 0 vs o vi ir N ► m i' a � CL L ./ Oo flo y CO. i _ mZm Cti Da i 1 o 3, Z O I t =. 1 ,'�_ as t•. 16 I i a • _ ium SE 1 o��� ;I ! SR 61� I 0 Z• 1 1 • 'F c ,,.:i♦i' �, la. _..I is MCI m .. _ ___..___._... • 1 cr.,/ .. oi!<aio.1 �• 'ro .S.Ei.! Imo.... co- e♦♦♦♦el.e♦Pae♦!, • .. +-_.. 132nd Av SE 1w :_� , i • '♦♦♦e♦♦A♦♦•♦♦fie♦ee♦e♦♦♦♦•:♦'►1:+♦•♦e•�♦ii♦•ems 1 / ly 1` p A4♦♦♦♦•P•1♦♦♦♦e♦♦�,♦e♦♦♦♦•♦1<:♦♦♦♦f a•.i♦♦♦eeeA� .. 1 : :' IL, ^ �-♦•� T 4. •�' ♦♦.♦♦�♦♦•♦•♦♦A.•♦♦< ♦•♦♦♦♦!. 1 A I ♦ems•♦.♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦I. .. r44♦ ♦e ♦ , ..♦♦♦♦♦•♦'a.ei•e•V►♦♦♦♦♦e♦+b♦♦♦let.•. .. '►•••♦••♦♦••♦•♦•♦♦♦••♦••••♦♦♦••Y iv. 1 •♦:♦♦♦♦♦♦♦• O O Oi ♦•♦O♦o♦O♦«♦>DODOe•♦♦♦•i/♦t♦•♦♦♦•♦♦♦•o•♦•♦•♦♦♦ • ...... ..A•••••o••.•••• • .•••sa♦ :♦♦♦'• s 1te♦♦♦♦ ♦a♦r♦.• ♦o♦♦♦♦•-)•►.:.:4..�♦♦e♦♦♦e♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦e♦.::.:• �- :��•�•••♦v•il�♦Sr mr•^S.lS.t ;;� `i♦♦♦♦�Y♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦. ♦♦•♦♦♦♦♦♦e♦♦�:t♦•♦e♦•♦♦♦•♦•♦♦e♦i►a rr♦•<^'p••♦ee♦e•♦•♦•♦•♦♦♦•f♦♦�l•♦♦♦t♦ -_._._..... : ♦ • •♦♦e i.♦-♦tbb♦) . p o♦♦A!••-♦♦♦•♦♦leea♦♦•-♦b!♦be-..-••.•.•.• � ♦.e.♦!.•bb♦♦!♦!ba ♦e♦!.. .a ♦♦!♦••►!♦.a iei`:`+♦i!i♦iiei .�i♦i•C'►♦Oi►�♦•�ii!s♦i♦i♦i♦i♦!<'Oi:•!O♦O♦i•:•►it'i♦i♦i♦•c:�!.. • • i r�ti♦as•Oii�.�;•♦♦♦o♦♦•oe♦♦eee♦♦♦♦•o♦!♦♦♦ ♦ooa♦�♦♦•♦♦oa♦e♦♦•e♦� �• e ♦,;:•♦•♦•♦•♦♦♦ e•♦e♦•♦•••♦A•♦ ♦•♦♦i►•' ♦♦♦♦♦♦•♦♦e♦e♦♦♦O•<,--♦♦♦:,•t♦♦♦♦•o♦♦.f••♦♦a♦•♦ ►♦is ••♦♦•♦•-A♦•••♦♦,4*** ♦<♦•♦♦,►!♦•♦••♦ AO.,"•.•.t••♦♦♦•� i K.' .♦♦!e!1 ♦.♦♦.♦ e!► ►ee!♦♦•bae4. f.♦q•♦♦a♦• ti •♦ ♦.•♦•♦.!•fie♦♦♦♦•♦♦•♦♦♦e♦ ♦♦♦ V A . ♦e♦♦a♦♦♦ e♦••a•♦♦b! ♦e♦♦♦♦i ♦♦•♦•♦•♦e♦e♦•eea•♦ee'►•♦'•♦♦•a♦ae♦•aeae♦♦♦•♦•fi a�)•i Y 1 ►•••♦••♦♦t♦e••♦♦♦e•♦♦••e•♦<•♦•••••••w ►•... V ♦ooee ♦a♦♦a Aee♦ea!♦♦!f••,e♦•♦♦♦♦•♦e••♦.• �i•♦♦a♦♦♦♦•♦•a<• ♦a• r e♦♦♦ ♦♦e♦♦♦.♦♦e♦♦!e•le.�. ..a♦♦♦e„teee> .. •♦♦♦♦b♦♦•b♦•♦!• .•♦• f O O O •O♦♦e♦•► 44e♦eb.e♦X...4. .• ♦♦ ♦!♦eo♦ eb♦ ;\ •, ( ••a•!•♦♦e••ew.♦ ♦♦• ••�•+•i•••i i iei♦ieiai<�ai iei iei ieioi♦i i'••i ieiei♦ieie�♦�e�t•`�•i ieo►i, o♦a+♦!++•a•♦•m••a♦♦•• ♦ ♦• . Sd � ♦♦•e•!♦•b♦eao♦♦a•♦b.!♦•..•♦♦!ao•.♦♦♦♦>♦. ml ♦♦♦•o♦♦b•!•♦�a•♦•♦•♦• t• ♦••. k 1�.. ♦•♦a0♦♦♦♦♦!aa♦♦♦♦ae♦•aa♦A♦♦o♦a♦a♦♦♦♦♦♦♦e•<e•♦•f♦♦a♦♦♦♦o♦a��oe♦j♦♦•ja♦•♦<♦♦♦♦o m� •♦♦�••♦•♦e1►t♦♦♦ ♦•e♦♦♦ ♦S. ♦••e � , O O O •♦.♦♦a a♦••♦♦♦♦•♦♦♦♦•.♦♦t:•♦♦♦♦<�..♦•♦• ♦♦• ♦♦<♦a♦x. ►•ii•:aii♦i'♦•eii••e�w♦ioiiii♦i: .•ii•�ii:♦i•. ♦♦♦♦•♦♦♦♦e♦•o♦A♦♦a♦oao♦A ...........♦•♦♦♦♦oe•♦• 1.4.>,►♦♦♦a♦oao•A♦♦♦♦e♦!f♦a♦•♦ .. /.♦`,:.♦♦•A•♦♦♦e♦♦ ♦♦•e••.... e:i•►vs ♦•♦•♦,.♦.♦ Z_ O O l0 O'7♦e♦♦.♦.a.♦a♦♦♦a.+o•♦♦♦w...♦♦♦e♦.♦!!t♦!< ♦ 3i ♦♦A♦♦.♦-•!al.♦♦P.•♦e♦.es• ♦♦! 1 ___I ♦te♦e♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦•♦♦aA•.♦♦!♦a♦♦!!♦<�►e♦•♦a♦a♦♦♦e4 i•♦♦aao•a!♦♦!•♦•♦♦llaea♦t1♦eele:.f♦• �:: ��i!♦••ilt0��1�..•i i•♦♦♦A♦♦•♦♦♦♦••♦•!♦♦<-ti►�: !♦!♦♦4♦e l �-- w.-.,.... I w!••!.•_!•aa.ab..a�♦a♦e♦♦♦•.♦♦♦♦♦bales.♦.►a♦__�b .4° a♦'.•♦!♦♦•w♦e•••o♦•!♦♦!•a♦! •41::, ♦w�.1 l C >1)t f^ ? ♦t f••. •►t I•sl...A!••1..a• .•.• ��- �`♦ a�♦♦b!a•♦P♦♦♦♦ ♦♦-♦. ♦♦.♦ 1 f O O O ,O O E. p s'aiti•!i!i!itite.itiii•t•tlaai.�.eo•!♦iioiiop.•.+a...- •�i�i r •.<rr. ...... '..•«•. ••w.•.•.•��•terl��e:♦^�♦••♦•i♦iitai/i`i►i2� f O O O O • ,.''7 4.C. �eiaif•ea°�!O♦♦♦•ieiti a!a!i:::aeiea•!•♦e♦♦♦!♦•oa•♦♦; i♦i;•,-.► i>♦i't.", 'Dori•ems• .*:♦:::: i"•♦!i•♦ef i i e•.%i0!%•/i0:4:0.e . 1 OOe♦eoa♦'♦o1.Oa♦•Oaaeo♦<i♦e♦4i♦oil bo♦a/A • 4 ♦ •►/ • O♦a0• e e♦ ♦o♦f.•f `. a a IP•q •a♦ra♦♦6•o ♦a♦e •abOi•♦ A!a•!a! ♦ ♦♦!. ♦•1taa0i♦♦!♦♦♦b ♦ N! 7b<•• •!< , i t - eeiF♦a.►♦♦♦oe♦♦•♦♦Oil.•• e♦♦♦b:it>••♦♦!♦!. ►. ♦♦,. • •!!♦•Aab!!♦.♦labe•♦!••b � ♦i. *: j •oaa♦♦a�!♦•♦+.►a♦•ee•••.o♦a.♦♦♦o♦.♦•oe♦•o/,.tee♦�i♦!o•oeo��,♦o♦lca;�!♦e!♦.!♦♦Ao♦�♦♦� "�i!♦♦. 0•♦.••♦o♦!•♦♦♦!!♦•••♦♦!!a • ♦♦ a , ♦♦•♦♦♦♦a o a♦•••♦•♦•♦•o♦♦ea•♦♦♦e, ♦ee♦♦♦!!.o♦a♦ao�►o•♦.!♦!.oa!o♦♦� r ,♦!!♦. ♦♦•!wi r•••♦.♦•�•a•♦•!♦♦•++rw .' ;+ �. ♦•♦♦ee•oA ♦♦♦af io♦♦A•e♦♦♦!!♦♦ �ii�►♦i iiiiei••°o•: •!•♦•♦•!•♦♦!•!♦O♦e♦•a!•♦. s ••. XJ . l+laeeao•.♦♦a•.b♦• e♦a♦♦••aa♦ew♦a♦♦•.•♦ s♦oe♦ i'.w:A•�•♦ •!e•e!♦♦♦-•. O... Q O O O • -• ;'•♦�iti�i♦i►ili�i�i�aiei'►i+i°ooi°.ai♦♦.•eis♦Afo•�w.•.t.♦..i i a e.♦!a... ♦.♦♦. .a-A..• V�.• ♦�♦!♦♦♦•.o a•�♦iia ♦♦i♦i0i t ♦.a♦►t♦••!•�o e!••.♦a o•o b•a'•.a.�..,-.,♦a o•oe000•o.f� 6.!.e♦a♦.�•+e!♦e e '.•*:.♦avOeeO!•o'♦•.14.♦A••e!♦♦♦•D♦a'•i••fr ,.ie. '�♦♦♦♦1♦♦•a.•..••.•♦♦♦♦a♦♦..a♦♦.�♦�.♦.♦a♦♦a0 • �a1^••♦al.♦♦.a•i♦.•♦!♦♦!+♦eae ♦...�e•!•iu• •eee♦e♦ef♦•tee a♦a .i..�fe♦♦♦eae♦e♦ee♦♦•♦♦♦•♦♦eee•.e44..Vie.t�e♦•••!•♦•♦e/.. j♦♦ei.♦•♦•�f♦e•♦♦•!•Ae♦♦!•♦e!•♦•♦•♦•♦♦♦a•♦A!♦♦♦♦e♦♦•♦♦,►<•♦a♦o♦•♦� f ♦.•!• O O rO cQ O O O O �.'• ♦♦♦a♦♦•♦a•e♦♦.••e♦♦a.♦♦♦oaa♦♦!a♦♦..♦♦♦♦♦!•_ ►!.i•an♦♦♦•♦♦♦!..♦•♦♦♦♦♦•♦♦eA♦♦♦•.t >♦!!♦♦ ;, ♦l�o�oio.:.f:♦♦♦� t♦43.4 o�.♦:4••♦:♦:♦:♦:o:o:o:o:o:♦:♦:♦�.♦:♦:o:•:4IC4♦�., ♦-•-•-♦-•-•c♦- ♦-•-•♦-•:+-♦-.." •-••••:.:+00•••••i♦4 i•••:+:..♦l.lae•!♦a♦ab♦•♦ -'.. ♦♦♦♦.b♦♦•!♦ava♦b♦♦♦•a ♦e♦♦>•i♦♦!a•►♦♦♦♦e•♦♦o!♦♦♦♦♦♦-•♦♦ ♦..♦•♦♦♦♦• O O' O 9O O J O O O • • •OOOOi->♦•eOO♦♦0000!•i Ore!`Oa:+41+♦•♦a♦ :i!'O♦•OO•••,VV C • i♦•a t tie♦♦e♦+!o♦•♦♦• ♦••♦e♦•..a !•,,♦•1 a♦!♦s ►!!♦♦•..a♦♦♦!.♦♦♦!♦ae.♦e.♦♦•e.♦•!.•.••.•e� 1♦♦b.!♦'+ea.b♦♦♦!••♦•♦ •♦♦e♦•v ♦•♦.!•f♦••I♦!_ 212th A 3E ♦..♦f•.♦♦♦a.♦♦•♦e♦!♦•♦♦)♦♦♦♦♦!!!♦♦!a♦♦♦•if ♦e•.•♦♦ ♦♦!♦♦►a!♦♦•♦♦♦♦.abeev ♦♦!.♦•�! •!♦•.a►♦ ♦♦aalb♦♦♦♦•♦aaeb♦abab♦'♦•♦♦.•♦♦ee•►ae♦♦e♦ R ` /a♦a•bve♦♦♦•►!♦ioa•♦•.!♦•♦•.•♦•!•`.♦ ♦♦♦•♦!b♦♦4!♦♦ U .3..._.00" O • • q r♦♦♦♦♦♦I 4 lea•♦•!♦!f�w�la♦♦♦e♦••♦!♦. .♦•/..•.!.♦ �eo�/♦..off.... \ ••♦♦♦♦♦•.♦•e♦♦♦♦a•♦s♦♦♦♦♦♦a • ♦♦!♦!•►♦♦♦:• �� ..�._ !.♦♦.b♦•♦♦♦1�♦♦i a♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦ •♦♦♦ I /ieijfij•!♦jo•♦!♦a j♦♦•j.j•♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦f+♦••!♦•♦♦♦♦••♦A�.♦♦♦•♦♦♦♦•♦♦♦♦♦♦fir♦♦♦♦♦+Ir♦�►i d♦♦ <1 r •!i+•.•�♦eo°iO♦:�♦i♦i♦i♦i♦ii♦ii♦i♦iei♦�'i♦i •►►''.�.• r a!♦e♦♦+♦♦.<♦a:VA♦!♦♦e!♦♦♦•♦♦♦e.♦♦.�"i•.. tO O O O O CS O O e' 1 ♦♦•♦♦♦a !♦•♦be♦ ♦♦♦♦♦ebe♦♦•♦!♦!► ♦ .>♦ a•.' �.♦ii'♦*i�♦�.a�e'•?iei♦ieieiiei•i♦i!i♦i♦iilio:o5•.. •c••.a' v. SE ►♦!♦♦!♦ •♦♦♦a! ♦♦!•e.�•♦♦♦♦♦♦♦s,•�Ii♦♦+A♦ 4 a.♦.♦e b•a.♦...:♦..♦.♦.a♦.♦v♦e .. ..._...'__..'---; L ►.j►aeae♦•!t!t ,.•••!♦♦♦f•�ene♦♦♦♦♦::4..•♦♦:�::::..♦♦.♦♦•♦••.�•♦•!��ri!f♦!•♦ a♦•a♦♦a♦•.•♦eete♦•!a♦♦� aa♦♦.♦♦♦o�•i.. •►♦•♦•a •.•♦ •o!•e•!`i•o♦••♦♦ '. .:+♦s•A •♦♦♦e•♦e♦♦.•e.•. o•.e••♦e♦ere♦•aeeti...,.;: ♦♦!.♦o-♦ ♦•4:4 ►O♦ .: +f$1:.:4. .::,*►..::i o♦f♦e O O'b O�O O O :%. �•.e!•♦a♦•eaeea♦•a♦e♦•O!♦.a w a!A!•♦•!•♦•♦a�♦ e•♦♦♦•o♦o•♦<, i� 1 •• e o�♦: /♦e♦♦!e••.♦•♦ .!♦f.♦!!a♦ • // ♦♦♦b.♦♦•♦.♦♦od•►.e•♦♦♦♦ ♦♦e♦.... 1 , . • .._ b•♦•♦.....;♦gip♦•♦t<4,4o�iie<+•!a♦•♦••♦♦4 . , ♦♦!♦♦!♦a♦aea♦♦:..a♦♦aa♦♦♦♦•- I ,: .o♦bv♦%b!e♦.a.•.♦b♦s♦♦ ♦4i••t a.♦♦♦••♦..4+♦eae♦!♦!o♦fef!!.!♦f/f ,:♦e♦♦♦••y • •, .$O♦♦•i♦♦♦�,r s�•♦•e ♦♦►♦ •♦♦♦♦ 0-c _ 9 1 • O O O ♦.��weai♦o♦i ie♦AiA♦!♦ea•♦'i•:!♦•♦•♦•♦•0 1 a.♦!•oo♦oa♦o♦•�� /' � 1 �ae ,: `_ .•♦.r: •A♦!♦♦♦• ♦!♦♦♦♦♦!♦♦♦♦!♦♦e ♦N•1 0 1 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 1 1 a O 1 1 ►A., * .a •♦o♦♦!a syf!♦a♦e�Pw•i.i�.�♦:!♦♦•♦•♦♦t•♦!♦♦•♦♦♦•♦•!<1•♦ / � �.111 l0♦1•Ib 1u11111 A �{ O •••'• kg, !•�� ♦ ♦eD♦♦•♦♦♦♦♦.♦•♦♦•i♦ !< 11 111011 / 1 IAI 1 ► � f I •►:❖:•��. -._.- !a< ..�1� a•�b♦..♦♦♦!!♦•.e!♦•!♦ O •1 O O O 'c,__ •►,I 11 1 Ibt 1 I I, , 11 I r.• a♦!•• •.!• .-•o•:!♦!!♦.♦♦♦oolo•e!♦.s• / ,Y. ♦♦.Oo.l••leool•1••1•/00l r - 1 7 /r :' •♦♦ ♦ ♦•♦♦•♦•.♦!.e••..♦♦a•••.• I O• ,.3a� - •eo►•1�•i.o<••1•i•.►►,t,; � � � ►•.o• ♦!♦ ♦•.^•laA.♦♦.♦..le♦•!e.♦bsw.• 2 --- -- ... ......._.-'•.4- - -►•eee13 I:�II♦I:iI1:I•I1��11:IIii1 II;I,Ir,I• f/ 1 ►♦♦•a i♦1, ♦aao♦• �♦•a♦<•♦%V.V.•<•a•♦ 4/....♦eo♦aa�e e♦e♦•ea 03 --"CT CD''ailieiei.e•0•eeaa. !-. . a.A•srl ot•loln.,.,-I I 1 ♦oo♦ /- ♦�� �i,i i •♦♦s♦♦!•♦♦.. .o.!•o♦♦♦a♦ 1••1•1 a 1.y.t..1.1 o i 1 1;.:•. .,•. ► e:.a ♦•♦ ♦.♦Hite♦--'♦.♦%'.S"lea♦♦•1r!♦•♦♦ea♦1.:44: ,11',4. •e••♦a•eba.�, aA •►I•Io1.1.l..lntiili • II'1. ,P'..Ft:.11^I ••'. - ..♦♦.!♦♦l.N ♦a!e•.a♦♦♦!a•e.♦.♦!a.♦.s ♦♦!♦!♦♦♦♦ ♦laal•1.1f Aol 6.1• � 1 liifanu '; !!S d►- .♦a♦. .♦i!J'♦.•�♦•.!!♦be•♦.♦••♦l...a tr ►♦♦oa♦ao♦♦ea♦♦.♦♦♦a-- ._ •e1•I.. .loo•1.111- II / 1:•a.II:iIi . 89L .1 .♦+�•.tv!♦♦•♦♦•a •♦♦•♦7!♦.r•a e♦♦♦e♦♦♦ •O O O ♦•f.�o l•al 6 1...1• 1 I./A i.1•t. A". ♦O♦eti a�•s►♦s•!ee•♦••a•♦♦e<1 Aeo iei a•!••ea•!•a♦.a!"!•♦e♦•♦•!°♦ei ►ba♦♦♦♦♦♦e•1 *y_w. ',ao.,1;,1;i11;/11111„Ili . - ,1 O W♦ >t •.•..4.:♦♦♦♦l4a�♦•♦�•�♦6♦•a•♦4►�♦•e�.�♦e♦e<�♦�1��q�♦�♦�♦�♦�♦!�♦�♦ Yes•♦.eat.♦aa•oe• e�r N� �••<•lol.lidn'1 I.p• not.►..._ 10be0i♦i'O.•eeie•♦e. ae♦e♦•,••iea i .e♦♦ �♦e<••i�iI1:I1;rI��11y 1;1 0�I.I.•II;��; ��♦�♦�a�♦:•ie:• ►!a! :i i R►�►•♦�•�♦♦.♦.:..:.o<♦.•!♦.♦w♦•❖•!•o�•fea i?.a♦ala.o.♦!e♦a a!o♦♦!a. ♦eeeeaces♦a.♦4♦aeala♦a♦ae•a•♦♦aaaa♦:y�. s:.a.A.♦.:n0,;il,ix Il;i�i�ifnl"II;Ioir�.♦♦♦a•a• .•♦.♦�♦• i�ae!♦!ea♦♦♦♦•♦.a'..♦!!♦•♦e♦>♦!!♦♦♦♦• ♦♦a.♦♦♦a• ♦�♦* ♦!♦♦♦♦♦ ♦♦♦l lAoup.b 1;/u 1...• 1..►• ♦aaa.♦♦♦ ►♦'•e•a.0 ♦♦♦•ae♦e♦ee••aaaAa♦e!:••�.••a..!•aeaa♦ ♦♦e♦a!!a♦♦e♦♦ ♦a♦♦♦♦a. eee•A♦.11. 11.1.11.�e.♦♦♦♦a♦ A•♦♦♦ ♦.e♦e♦♦e ..ea♦e♦••A♦♦1e.+1♦• ♦♦♦�♦♦ .♦♦!♦ P•►•1.6f 11••IAoyP�►• ♦a.♦♦ee♦ �N♦ ♦♦�•♦..♦•wee♦♦ •i♦e♦!♦♦P�♦♦♦♦A♦♦♦•e♦e1!!♦♦!♦e♦ ittitnifit+.:1,:11:titt'%‘::41,411:i;:11;!4:i ♦.fie♦leale♦ ♦♦♦♦♦♦ A♦e♦♦♦♦1.11,1.•• 1. 1•l•.1.•1.11111!♦/•♦e♦♦.♦ !♦a•♦♦.•. .e♦♦♦•♦♦•••♦.•♦•.♦♦♦A♦ ♦••♦♦♦!♦♦♦ee♦!! ♦♦b♦♦♦.•♦ a�♦♦.♦♦. tt.•1!♦aa♦Iip.1.. _ • _ 1.p•1po1..1...♦!♦e♦♦•♦ ►♦ea•♦M♦♦♦...♦♦ • t.♦♦♦•♦•♦eb♦aa4•♦4♦♦♦e♦•♦•♦♦♦♦♦e! ♦♦♦♦♦♦♦ ♦♦♦♦.♦!4�•I ,... 11;1..►.pfoe•�•►♦♦•^.a♦ f•b♦••♦•!�•♦♦♦♦♦♦•�!♦♦♦♦♦•!♦♦ ♦a♦•♦♦♦.►♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦.•a♦ a♦!!.•/r 1.1•.►. ��-�+1 � :1'•r...._� II:II.11;1.;/. 1 ,♦.♦e•♦♦♦ •.♦♦.•.♦♦of•♦♦ee♦♦♦e.♦•!♦♦♦w••..b♦1A♦+♦♦♦!♦♦♦♦ .♦•♦♦♦b♦•t'ate•♦♦♦♦♦•1 1 11/r /^....---; t.. 1 t..l..l.II ,:I�iilii�aa<ia♦e♦.♦4+::. •♦ee eA•!•ee♦♦ace♦eyf�e••e♦•a♦a••eea••a••e e♦•aea••♦s .ef♦!e••a•:••+f`e♦♦♦♦et►♦a♦•♦♦e•e♦•♦♦•!♦aa!♦♦e♦a♦a♦� *!!!a♦a♦oll�il„1.1•• :......i.,...,.._ �, I114 :Ialr l:'1�'t.:i P.�♦1♦.e•.. ♦♦♦♦e.♦♦aa.�♦a!♦aae.♦•�♦♦!•'♦•fit♦•♦...a./aae♦e•a♦ ♦♦a.♦ r.ai.♦♦♦aa♦ ,.•♦•♦•1.rliilii ;,1ii .,„. .,11;e1:„.,... ..•a.e♦♦<. •♦.!a♦a!♦• !♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦ea•♦♦e...♦i♦♦♦ea♦♦♦t♦♦e♦♦!♦♦ .o e!♦ a.!•♦ .•♦♦♦ti••e♦♦•Abe 1 ►1 i.„,' 1 ._. .o►►.1 oli. ,e,c.;•iL>I e'`Oieilieier• Dii!i♦!eiiiaiei i♦i♦i♦iaitieiieieieiiiaiaieie►0ii•Oiieiai'O♦ie0i♦ieeieiaiiei • Villie •.♦!.• .♦•ab.eb•'5.'. % ♦•.♦.•..i� II ......_ .. ..... .•1V41. •, w• ♦•. •••♦A•♦♦.♦!.♦ea♦♦♦.!•e.♦♦e•♦♦e♦•..s..+4; ee!♦♦♦. "-0,,,,......♦ ♦eieieiti♦i•♦♦i♦i+ibitie0i!♦♦i♦iei♦i '°i♦iliil '1�!1� !:I1:iliill: �I �_ •,. ,at�i!t ♦♦e•e./A.A•v...♦.!♦.♦!e♦♦♦aae•1!.♦..e♦� ♦o a♦e.♦...• e► asp.a♦♦♦aaa...aaea.....a•, •.e..,.., ,„il„11;„ Iru.►.l.II .•i .1-�a♦:.♦♦aele♦eaeaa♦aa4'. ♦♦eee♦♦a°•♦♦. .♦♦ ••a<JOa♦♦♦♦•♦♦•♦♦ •♦O b•♦•�♦♦•!.b♦♦♦... L. ♦♦•♦1 f•f..1, 'lir �1.1 n o.•I f �►•♦�..♦�♦♦♦♦♦.•♦♦•• •'3�i♦a♦•1ea♦a♦aea♦a♦♦♦ae♦ea+�.♦••ea�i♦.♦eaaf♦aao♦a.�ale.♦ea.♦.ao♦eo♦ 'a♦.♦♦♦f•►♦♦b.♦♦♦♦• It' ♦f 6;,•♦a♦♦it a I•► v ,!r1l:Iliil'Itt!1 D 0'••e♦!t:'5 •'.+.♦•♦tae♦taaetat♦•* . ♦♦•••�!♦ •e••♦..b♦!!�♦!♦♦♦..�•/.f•♦'♦♦e♦•:flbl• :.;lu►.l..1 �♦.♦e o!♦!e♦a♦*a♦ae1 ♦♦♦ ♦ales♦♦♦♦♦♦..♦!e♦!Na•♦e•a 4.♦a♦♦9 ta•.-♦ee'.♦aa .♦aa♦e♦•.f+mob.♦♦♦♦ I.1 1.1.111� ♦f ♦♦!♦♦e+♦e♦♦♦.�..a�.ee.!♦♦♦a♦.♦♦♦♦!a♦♦♦♦♦.e♦♦•�♦G♦.♦♦♦• ♦•.ela.•.♦et♦•♦♦.ee♦.!♦b4♦♦!•!•l al•I .•1•+♦1••1 ... ,'!♦L♦ ►a.e.♦♦e•e•♦• .•♦,.♦ee♦♦♦..a♦♦♦♦•a•0.•♦♦•!e!♦•♦♦L iei♦ie0i''.'.'.$$$$.'$$$$•♦e♦•♦.'#.'..•'5eiaiei iiil, I `'iIi'b:<tlil D c ..D -♦eft-•i a♦• iei♦•'5'5d''.•�yieieili i��°ieiA.er iei♦iei,,,,oeiei♦,,r,,i,,,,....i. .,,, ♦♦•.♦ aae♦♦♦•!••♦♦.♦e♦♦••�!.•�.•.f.°�III I, 1::: P. .♦♦!♦♦•♦♦!♦. ♦a•.♦.av♦!aa♦♦♦♦a.e♦♦♦♦•..-♦Aa♦a.♦be!•♦ t•t'��+e1•�,ei�..♦�•).j.•.•.♦�.a)er♦f�Al�.! .. �t ; •♦♦ae♦.•a♦.Aa♦♦♦.♦♦♦♦.!.♦!♦.a♦♦♦•a.♦♦♦..♦•♦!♦e•1la A.♦r _ _ lip ae♦...♦♦e♦e.♦be♦..•.•.♦.♦♦♦♦.e..f••♦♦..4.. ►•►a.♦.•♦♦•►o♦t...•.a•♦ • eY'•YY!!!Wp• n� •. ♦♦aa♦♦♦•e♦••:♦..!♦<. ae..! �♦♦♦.♦!♦.•.♦� ►♦.♦e♦►b♦♦.;- .♦aof♦►♦ao♦►aeaa♦a�lf�:lea♦a+700.aa f fr),_ %' " - .:,Z:1 ,44s.••••♦,•-•♦a.�.i♦a� •i•♦♦♦e.A•♦ea•a-•!ee♦..ea'I'.' 1 e a_♦.•r•♦•sr•e♦♦♦• r.a•O••i•!►O.❖; ..a ►.e/ aa•♦O•o♦♦o♦...< .•.,; D D D Ds D e.♦..♦.aa ..•er•.♦+.•.t..: f♦♦.Ho•oe♦•.aoo•la.ebe♦♦ �• „ o«t ♦beo•♦a♦ •�.__- �(►♦•ii'♦a.e.♦aa♦!••a.♦♦.<eb4-••4 .•o♦♦aa♦♦aaaaa!♦ = /. • •...•...♦ 6• •♦♦♦♦a•♦♦♦lo ..aa♦! • r♦•♦!•♦♦.►!• ♦ ° ►•♦e♦e.♦♦e�!•e♦•♦• ...•e?....♦•♦•.Oeoee•♦♦.....eae.....❖ ♦♦a•♦♦♦•.•.•••♦♦• ♦!e. 1 n i♦e•a .♦•tom ,u - ♦•♦♦••te♦e!e♦e,: •e ♦•♦o♦ea••e D ♦♦o♦♦.o♦♦•a.be.b.♦♦ A ...q • • O .•aa•♦..�..♦.♦aae♦♦♦1•♦ f tae♦ ♦♦♦< ♦.a.♦♦♦.a••♦♦♦♦Y.♦ �,.+°'1 •i a♦e1e�i�i►i♦011ieO♦a�e eaa♦e♦eey♦t�• I e ,`••♦eee `e.♦a ' •!.♦e a♦♦•♦!.♦♦♦•a/.a.♦♦....! ���'..1.°���j`♦�o♦. �etr�e���♦��::::♦. D ...,, .,.., - - _ _ . .....__D.. ... t._... •i a.tr•♦e a �♦♦. ._. •:i.4..4.♦•oa♦f♦i..•ioi.' D .❖e♦.�►•.b♦a ee!••♦!♦: •;•!•�i••M♦o t. .,, Jf ,t e!i ♦ .. �. ��♦4.000 ♦•. ♦♦..♦♦♦.♦♦a.!a �!.♦ D. r fl R,,; t.•♦♦ ie♦i ♦ .abao•/ba.; D D D „ D •aei•♦e♦e♦•ii. bb♦be9♦►♦♦aaea♦:�. ar. .. ... __ • :,..e♦♦ ee�-e_►aa♦♦♦ ..W • ♦♦♦♦•♦♦• � b..e♦b.►♦♦.e..be•.• ..►• ••• ►♦.aa♦ ♦♦•�♦-.►♦cab. bea♦♦•aa♦ ob • ♦.•.•.era•.a.•..•..♦•,►♦f.♦• �ooa 000•�alowse_ .a•o♦ •♦.•♦e.► bi♦ .c.,..rs♦a.♦•aaaab♦.leb••e D q .D. _ .. _ . D .e.••eao.ebo♦,a s D D D ♦ C,•eoaeiaV :::::eie eoeieieit♦•i♦•ei♦ieoe''♦a,1 e,,,z:,.4wo •>oe• •..•i o o e♦♦♦�y coo•♦!. 1 :o .'•o O �1 •.♦.1e♦aa.♦e♦♦.e.♦♦ i. •♦•♦..�•eaae♦•..♦♦• ,1 eeee♦�•�•eeeeeeeo♦fle.♦labs♦♦•t ion a ♦•♦• e a.♦.♦♦♦•r!a♦• � ♦ ♦ ffl D ♦abet •.♦•..♦♦a♦♦♦!Ob-• •eeee•••♦•eee•♦•►ea• b0 ow O♦•> '- .r i i,e e e c4, D D . ' O•aa•♦ee•!♦e00.•Aa••♦•♦•►♦O••♦♦i D D J D D! ❖. ♦ .r .Z PJ tit: n� �e�e�e�f�e��ae�♦•b o♦♦•►♦.• m • O i Oei Qw ..•♦.aiaieiaiei iei iei►i•��•�� ``?� k 047:5 O �' col D eitOO D D Find D D D O•a••a 44•2:toe a toe♦ea!•ei►ae•♦e♦a D D D D D 1 O' i e♦♦ Oi'•• _ ka . - .d ••..00♦!♦0•.!e♦e•t♦e.eiai♦iei►.e.e♦ea. O z e•e•e♦et�s•.•. n♦ a♦.♦♦a♦..ae•..♦e1e•.e.o ♦ CD ` D D D D D �D ► �eitieieieieitieiei itieieiaieiei ieatitiaieieiei iei♦ D D D D D sm., . /N it.. .L,• .eea•♦••o♦♦i♦a•.o.•oa:!••.♦•♦.•ae.•♦....•.•.♦♦♦..ea♦♦♦•. - "r� - = y, 1.. - :,- ., - ,ebe♦e♦a♦eae•<6�e♦•eat o f♦a♦e♦eM1♦•e a•�ee aaaae♦ee�ee♦e• -. \ ♦. !♦.eea♦e♦e♦♦♦e♦eeae:a♦e♦eeee!•eeb♦eaee♦<lea♦♦!♦♦eoe R D D. D. D. D. .,. ...to.♦•.e a♦•e 0.♦•♦.... •♦,,...0'i......♦♦•♦ D. D D D. - ^' I �e0oiO� ♦� iiiiii ♦♦e♦ebbee.o.! . � �D D D; DD DD D D y O ♦♦• •aw•♦e+ee• 1 : - 'D D D D D • / D D p D aao:♦+♦.l o:♦...1.♦, D, D - D , C ` 1 0 W > 1 D. D. D. - D 41 D D D D • . ,D D D.. d �- ../ C CD '0 o q o IT a O Y o :. r. a '- r... T . ,......- I o - o * ,-.g : ', • 0 ri 0, ED $:*: *- _.] 1 1 53 33 i$. `Ti 19 (c-'``)--, .. o .1:1 -, _ ,-..' ,•.__. L-- L... '--—. 4,44 4, •.i. 0 0 0 0 I I.. ... '3. , .... c c av I Y. 1 a.: (-5•z -< :: 4, .. r, . pc- III 1 in. i.: ill E i = :I- ; f If C A i --4,-0 01 0..• ..4 i i t 4 5 il g M; -• i 0 (-) --4 a, > :7; .4 • E i t 1 i I c a iii I 5 gm 3 0 0 2 D., 0 la -% C t 1 0 a I lit gl. 0 _. 0 o :I ,-, cs. I i 151. i n ! S. i x C > 0 ..z t...4 ,-• a -c, o 1.,,., ..., I CO 0 .1 • at, a lip 0 > ° 1 M (1 ti 1 Z 3 * 0 E 5 0- F a. * -13 - -L. - n"-7---'.,;`) '''' `' ::?.- t ''' !‘-,-' - - '5 ''•.'.v..."..*****Ast".•.•:-..v.v..4:to.v.v.ss• • ••4.•,••••••••••.,,••••%. to ..,N 0) 0 01 0 0 4 . 0 0 0 '0 0 0 b 0 0 b 0 0 0 0 • ... ! ' 212th Ay• SE / 212th Ave SE ':•:•:•:•:44. +:44+:444+:••••;p:av: —I r x > t) 0k 0 -01 b. 0 112)7-07-0 07.0- 0 0 if"...;.t,-. -0. !. 0 4,-- 4:4**,4'0.4* •••••••44".1....•444•:•,...••,....4"-••-•- • , k•-•,..1.•-•,-*-••1.-•-•-•-•-•-•-•-•-•-•--•--.),•-4 i Q. 0 0 0'' 0 0! 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 I 0 0 6 0 • 0 ..0 0• O.:4Zatit*:::: :;:::;:::::::::::•:::::1 .4/7 41 Z tO Z ... . .-;; •. - - : ,-. ,. ..x.:.:.:.:44.4;...:., , 0 ... 0 0 0 ,o o d.'p o `6" p • O o o o...:::. X.:•:..••:•:.;,4-m1;44,14.:4 4.:44,!:214 c Z - 4* .••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••44%VA***AS***." e , 0•••••••••••v.*, 4,4•••0 I 1 6 0 7•••••••••••••••••,• C) - • -•• .'••••1 . * 0—0-0- 0 10---0-- = -• 4. . • 0 0 0 •:±0.!.400.:0,:+:14:*:+61,4v,otwel..,,),""t"......0..... ,2 Z \ I ' 1 . J-.7.-.4":011iig:Iiiii:atililiiIiileilIVIKW.94 / Ci 0 p000 .4,41 : ' •P • • ° 0 • ° 'IP ° • 1° ° ° :40' .4t'''-'44.iiqii:410Niellitr• i •• ' ,. , . 4 • I - '5 ---. .1 --- - • - •V ' - "'-.7WIN90410%liVini4tiliiiiO4:".1 • > 0 !o 6 o o •• • • ( !o o'' o v o •-o :••••••••••••••4-:.---•--;::'..W4Pini(tAiltNY:410411; , . , ,1 N:„..i..,.!; X I I /...t4 0 ! 41. +:444:444 -i..;:e:.--.4.4411:11:Niiisi:14111 ' . t 0....004. ..• .:!oil 1%...' .... '. -------4-------:L 0.•:, '''.-..4"-415--- ° ° 3 • ° •I•:••••••••:::::••••:•1;-.:4'''. .L'It,-;".t'%‘+•••:41 4111 4 01 htil;I i l'.Iii 0144:e. . . • ;It i!t;I.:j a ttji 11 II .1. ,C., . • 4 Z : —, ;;•:•:.:....•......X.M.X.X4 14.44.,-4.4-„.'4:18 as:;• ; to!, k.,.4i,:, ;• •.s:),,. : : a -k 0 .,,:•:+:+:44+:44,+:440:44.-em.,t4.40.;i:ii:0: .. o..........., IziC•it I 4 4 4 0 ei•••-• • *•• •-•-•--11--------i; 1 wg C.:•:•:•:•:•:•:4:•:•:•:•:4•••:•X•i•X'..••;•i•:•:•:4 i:q i a a ',' ' - --- II i.o,:qi At, .. ,,r. 1,. -.vie- 0 i 0 0. 0 ...:444,0:0241:44.40:40: x.:44.:44.:.:Ki i I q ---si .;...co.,..,... ..,...z.„. • .„1,,11,....41,1 r- ... ..,..- --1 - •••••••••...r.•••••••- ••••••4....... , , . . * ° ° g. i t --.. 611:s.---I---1'- ..7111......°.;I,::,.1°....h°4.-,..,:.,511:•!•,.:4:!...••;1441118".7;••••••••••••••••1••••••••••••••::•:$12:11.. k••••••v1•"•:••••411,411 iii;;;;.0.4.-1-. . '.'71% i:i i ii iii ii:I g.''i.,•,441$4;!....i:SI - ii4iiiNif it > NIS 0 .0000 . ( i , 2. :.•-•i.,• •-.Ic.......=........................%,........too*AM,"'.. ••••.••••4••••••1414101: .044iee0,1011 ' • 'i••••••'ii44•-:.:'•••••••e•••••••••••••"•••••••••••• ••••44:'-•!1!,,*.,-',.0•••••11i I i OA: r:2 !'..•.!4P1 IA •••••••• ;,'40 0 • t*T----1 -: 1 L :.*:.:+:44.:0'kW.40:44+:":. 44.4.414(AV* :040" . . 'AN't000 i 44 o••••••••1 ti.:•:•••••VA:44,X v:+:4)*:•:•• .444 04 Pt? P I '[ •• '•''!!1 411 "•••••••*fr••••••• C 0 • i•4•;•.••••••••••••••••: 0 i•i•:•:•:,:••••••••••••'••••••••••• • ••••••••••••• •••••••••%!:111 I 1"I 1 : p6= 1 1 i::::..::it n I ----- -. ---. -- "C.•e*:•!•-•,-•-•..!iftS•••.!. _.... ..•••.•144....•.•••••••:'4.4.,•!..•4•4•:•••:••:•>•t•t•t•-•-•-t•_1:•_:.:..!!_ L.- I.' - 1 I I, ',i Is •;•:•:•:,•:•:•:•:$:•:•:•:• 0 0 • I 4444; 0 •••••••••, •••••••••••••:,•;•70:4 X•:•:•:•X•,:•:,•:4•X•X•:it 4•_.t•z.,; ;,.‘::,:.• - --. ci--- .3i ..... .... •••••••••••••••••' I -::•:•:•:• ....,,,te, 0 •••••• •4- •••,......44.4.•••••• 0,, 4 1!.;,-- 4,...c. t •41+:4•14..,..w ....•.•.•.•.;,...Aii.-----ft. •••,,,2 ,41,„ ...... .._ _ lox _Bei er sy 1 (-A., to 4.!•••,•••4•••• •.:•:•:•:•• : •4 44••• 'V,,-..„.... :•:•••••••••••••/•••••4•••••••••••••i .'-''i**•2- VIOAt . 1 ••••• ••••• ••V •••••••,,•„•.•;•••••&•,•••••••••,•,4 .-•,,,• • •••• ••••••• • • • •- .4 ..•„!.k-•,-.14•0,,,xis,••••,,,:4,•••••••• :-.. :...,•:-:. r',.••;•••••••.: 0 0 0' o b 0 ,o 0 0 •1 • :4'4.46.40!••:4-1'4411V•MM.••• 41.4, ' ;R.' .0,41/14•:•44111,/IV*"0,•;•••;•;•7•••••••••••.------.' :• 1•:::• •.4,,, . •••••••••••• , 0 0 0 •,4 4 el 0 X,4,•44.N 41 0, a 04.„4 I 4,1/ ••••••••••• 44.:: .• . ••:,:•:•:•:t0:••:•••.4;44: • ..:•X> , C't . > •, > / > > > •e•••••••••••••••1'•••••••4:A.° ••• 4•1:- so. . .•••41.!••••• I> . I :., v.,•••,•••••••••••• .„,•••,,•4.4,•...•4.44.; ..,....t....,...,,,..)0,4.. , , - x...x.x.x.x.x.x.,4,. ..... ..... . .„... . /, .• i . .-•....• ...............4.4 .. ...0.„, •i-,:.,.... • D,• D. D. . .i• •••4•••••••• ••••,•••••• c. , > > > • ° ° ••••••••••••••••• •••• • • • •,••'..;•??:•::•:••• . 4"04"4,404VNA0.04ANNA0.~4.44' utm,4 w(‘' p -.: 444.NAWOWNAO.NAOWNAOWNA06 7.. • ,••• I-:\ > > . 0,A • r) > > > r> •v.*,•••••••••••• *II •••••••4..,•••z > > > \• • ........„ > ••• .., -/ ••• •• %:•!•••••:• • ••••••••••47-•••Q. 1 '' ' •••.‘ r-' .. • • - CI •40. 9>44;4:4440:443, :t.,:•:•:•:•:•:•:•:4:414;:+:•X•: , ' ..4":4.4..........4•,•••'0%Nlb:**.%•:•X•41•:•••••••:•••:•X•:4 ' . . 'I 40'•v*:•:•Xce:+:4v,v...%v. .... .. ...v...• • •p•- •: ›: • • D. • › • D. - :.4'1...4:#,..........s•....14.:.:.....,....1e....•...•••••••••• •••• •4:te.•••••••••••••$•••••••••••V•••••••••••••0.,-••••••• ••• •••• e P•..•• ' „ .;••;!•••*,•t•••••••••'•••••••••••••V•••••••••••••••"0,+•••••••••"•••••••••••1•! ...••;••••.014.4.,,A 4•••••,14 141,•••••••••••,•••••••••,*,Veo.0,„,•••••.***,,,i or,•••• D • D 'D •D > ' ....K...:44....4.,;•,0,••••••%4•••••!••44 0 4:•••:•••••:0 0 0.4.;•,...4 A:1.1,444 t...4: .: *;i:••.:•••:*:!*:;:i.1,:i i:i i$$!::,:il:$:....:;:k:•••:::::;::;!:::*::::::::***•:::+:•M- 1 , •••••••••I-v.10..0P.o a••••••••• ••••••••,-,•;•;14:4:414:0: 4"41144.44tteeti!;:i' ii *:::::::* :::::::::•:+0:•••:+0:::•i$,-, ;Iiii::' 'itleilitin-lii'lliii4:14:ii:ilii!iiiVX ••:•:•:•:+4,040t•••:444:•••:••t4' 1 > > ,E> > r> , 0i.1010101)41iViPiPp41001110V.--. -..“'."0::•••••*:::::::: '"" ViiiiION11414:Afts44110414:1 •,•••••••••,,,, - . -: 1ViOliiiii.ii$ViiiPlnlit) l' 14104:!iftiV1iYiViltiliiiiil tt '040••••••••••••••• !Po • •••..• •tvl i*Vilti!il:i:q 0Iii'H" , •••••:*:t e:4.4.4:: > D •. D • 4A0Wk -INVM0? ! ! it- 4.4•.::::•%; -, ...I --! - 1 • ' • - • 0M:4440.-. t- -.- --- ..467.*:•,4y...,(-- . ••••-•-•-••••••,...- 40 . ° $ : > > t>g* 4 :....._,...44041.1•47.144 0. 0. _ 4. g • a ' ' •if . :-. 7.., 2 ::•:.:+:;"K •-•••:••••! is,••••4-4•,:• " NS ,0-:•:•:•, ''' t•:•:•;si:•••30--,.A >1 > ••• .....Y. • ••. ••• •-I'e:•:•:* . Ki.:•:•:***••::e;:•:+: 14, *y,. • -r _ _ ...---------_____ 0............ __.._ ____ .f.1.14, ....m.,,,,..1 .x. 1 ....- ••.. • : ....... .... 0. 0. 0.. 0. , , - 0'0 W'4:r 44 > > •••••••".•' • 7111104Agk •••. +4 4' - . (,;•. ,.. .- 77111 /A11: 41•••::•:••• • i ' 110 •••e••4%41-;•:•:. . ;I::::*44.6 *** •.0 ! ••, .:-i 4 i. 4.**4.*.•••••••••••:•••• • VP.41,41.., )=r a• > _ • > ../. _4...,„ , • .c>'1... •10.:••••`:•-.1211,I op„,,-1. -,,„.. ...... -'' .41-41••.•••••4'....ill .t>•!'i II,'!• '• •.•.••••0+••••••?••..•.•%4•.I..•.•t,8•••••r•>>•4•• •••••••••0••4.••X•••4•,1••4••1•0'2iCA i>4.....,;;.;4••:•4•*0.•4::•,:••A''4'::•:1:•.•••••:4;::••j••••r:•:••:•:•:'••i••:>:;•-e•••"••:44••*•*4••.:•"•4.•-4 1rW I•.414•4411/1•6 I 0'1,,:6$41•:444,4...41.1.:.,.4:iw•.-.-_.:;7',•!....41.."1:.•4':•/0.:,;iWi.:'•1:":•:"..:::4•:.4:.0.04 x.',..A.41.L!.I.I.z.I,4„•,:-'-•-.:-•*''•f 40i4•%40)"*4.p44 4•.*.:i,,••:0••:.-C••40.•••40:••4:••4:•••4%•:•4•.N:4••••:•:••••g:•:•:••4:••:4:•4 oi:4i it:•p•4•.,•.ii:*1.Il V••6 l:•.••.V,4:••,,,,,n:•.••,,,•‘*••X•e•-•l:i > .r4•w•••.n > - › › 4 4 "4 • • A‘•=4•.'••.••.'4•••7 A,••••i1%•••4t•eAe••••..k 4!0 > , ? > 1. ::4 . c .;4 .. ,'::.•k.."0,F*>>D,, ....'..r.D> ece, D. .1••.:41.•*: • 4 IP* ''''' ' •••••••••••••••••••••••••••;•••"••••• •••:4•••tt''...V•:•••:•:,•4 4.40:•:•X. 14:k 4 >"' > 11' > 7' > ••:.:• 1> D 1> '••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••+••• 04,11,t+r tr.'s' ...",--. ----.:.:st.:...-.., ••.:.e.t. _ .AAA* r..4 0 4 110.4...:4 0 6..•.•••••••••:•4X4•4.44 .•3,-' ••• t: -' 4. ............. . .. •• ..••4.O.,, , L;; -... •••• 444 f 1%$*•,,41S.1•1::t•i I 1 1 I[ A : 786 att-- • -• c> > •••• › > ,-.4w4.4 • . _ - :_ _ :.. 41,4- ;44044,,,,,,:iNr:4- ••:•X -*AO° .,r4404•444.:41w,I 4 i 1 4*v::,... ---•- __ •:;-;., • . _•:-,,:44: ..--i,,toozewtt,•:.: . •••••••••••„.4•••••,: 1 „ . 1>7' 0.3::*:::$.41 ii 1111 ,..4:: ::: .---.--,- • .---r- ,.: .. .; -.. ... ::1::::::::::::$ II AMY \lt::: :- s'. .' ---- :.- .-- .. -t ': r>8V314:+:4+:44-..•.-,-.- 4:.: -; • - •:, '-,- :. - . - ,- • .•.,-. , r? > . ,, tt. D• .•41.44.:..".......................4......*.00, $.:.t,;; , ,... . *. .. • . . --,.. ›g : ::e :4::i' ••••••••••••-'-' '; -., '• • - -:- > 0 > ' ., . .. •:•:•:•:4 0.:•:,•:::::•;•;*' .)••••••••••im t.--,,•.• •• - '-—- . - :: - • -- ,,,,,, ••- • • • - ... . L .............4..... v.v.., -•;•.,-..-..F.41.; .,'..,_-— -._.- .'•-,-. ;.... • „...,.••. •, . - f ' ....„•,........,•,...,,NI.,4,&v.. ...........,•••••,N4N, -.,. T-,.. , c> 6• > AAMAIWOAANW 00,WW4OX4v , - ... ••••••••••••••••,•••••••••t ••••••••••• 1 • ••••••••••••••••••••„••••••‘• •••••„440,'••‘&•1; c>,.... ..4141.4 At:00%W 0,7 • cl WM,4 C> >1 '•- - ,.....4;•,: .......-.' :•,t•• Te .40:04•••••41, c4 9 I - •.. ' . •I it so'•;". **VA".••••••••• 1 41 01' D 1> :•:•••: ••P:•••••••••••• D i D • t> D 1> uric' antsuaqaiduma , . . ••• *********** 4••••••••••••••• .1 3 . •••••••••••••••• 7> > ••••••=W••••••'' A > > . U 2 ••••••••••••••••• i > > 17 6 6 I - S u! ealv At0.19 uaa eq leug aq; s;dope , › z•,. D. » i r> 1). , > D. 3! UN/M. 113Un03 S.MOD 2utyi uemodollaw _ . . / - • '. /Cq pam_ollo; aq o; uo9epuatuumaal . , 4-• D. N> t- ›i:: > ± > > > I> > Cl f•.%Tri-w-1 9 iTtlifl IT cr &MT wrIrl Rill T Redmond - North ,....., Urban Growth Area . ,... 1 , .., ,„ , , . , ,:• . ...„.4...,..... ,•„.......... • . . I ... — • , , - --.,c‹,-h_:„. i-•.7.-)(5.j".3. --, ..'. , I H .. .. , iimilE. s---- • •,;:i.l..L.,:. l ••:-•••••-<>7.-1; • .., : 445 : • --4 "•-•-• - • 1 ...,„%/)711.".:,1c\,.. . , i . amblmigi r_.. i___ __., _,,_._ ,i. /. _., \---- \ 14---'-'7— % * . \ _ptir-1 . :---77 r 4-4--,--;71-1-74----).--`-, --- li. i _ : • i1 .> . , • t7,1 :42L---1 '-'7")-- ----t---1- ''• -;>'• :77,177.:Siz3. ! '4' 1 4+, i 1...71. F---Tir:1,.....,..1 . L-17- /•‘',/II;!E t-t-z-_--, A_.... . \ , -\ 1 '... is' iv...4Ilik„.‘‘‘4:-,Ii:1-iN "-:::7 7- f i i i j! :.---7-. i •-•'". 1111' r-7 (,11/II f 1,1,„:-1 ...--.....--I ii ' , ,,,,,•-i),.„,....,....,7_, i . •:1„ FT : liar, i-i-i- Illhillko: I ' • I -i...._ ,,,,,::-,-.----.2-7. . ,\ •t t.,, ,i, • 1 • . 7-i 1 rrrri : ‘4M '''m„,„,.. i : I iiiii; . ...w.g 11 \ t . ,j - _ , _ ,_-""-<:,.:".P. ...... , I : • : . . . mu ' 440:4am 1"'" --. ' .'"---t. .......,.. ii 1 c)*! ' f•-.'--- • . ;--: ___ . ....____: . . .._. I ..- . . -b i zi ,--_,- le .........! I (... , IA\ '1.." .1 1 t Valiferar . ;r• I 1.. A"'"J'r .-1.....H.+7...4.{ • __,---a. i .-6,,,n, -Ay , ..... z • i i i : i .. 1 i r---77 aalliel.111.111"1111.....______,: :M. ' • : • `rN•s . -I- --1 rA'/**••• `G 4;-.•`..2.4•,•••• : : ii II ,--- i ---I -----: • • • : pptiiiiii 1 m la ; ... ri u., , fa' i !r ,...• • ,.....K' ,..,,,....• r • i 1 .Wiri.41k7 II I .. . , ' r-' -2 411,..II.'. .44:r-' IT-i-c-1\'.isTrrr• ' : :" -1....‘4.1., F. 4.4*1114 • ,......„.....___••••\* 12 r•*'1.".:: ' •: .. :47-..'.....7. 1. II f ; • '•••• , .... leo . 1 "—I."; , .:. 1 i i: • . . munigs.7.1,At4..:... .pi - •"` ---r. '...-- ' ; •11 i "---11 ri---••2 I-4-4 • : .- . . li I lif I1 :: 4. ›..—•,.,1.....7,0tik,. re' .., ,br. .4: i i:„;,.777,777,77.„ h E 1 24th Ig ;::.,IMIT!..:*: iiitt'ii' '....::::=4.i..4 ,• IS I • '''' i ' .... 7.:ii ' 4:::.'ii:.,i i-----,... .,.4 . : :.! , ...,.......:.:::„.....: .,..,,.7.7„.:,..i:i,::,i:. ;h4:4.1',ig.t.lif ........................ i - i...1 -. ::,,::.. ::::.:::; : ./' ,,:ii:::: :::: . :-.'.!.''%:!:.::].::;..: ..::::: i,::i:i: ,;;;:::iiii,i.::::::.::::::::: .• ..••.•.*.::*:.:::::::,::,• fi::,,:,':,,::•:-',••:',•::::••:•-,"*"'• •.,:.....:;:".'5•••••••,::':::'•.•,:::%:::':', ::::::::::$:::•::':::::*:•:•5::.*::::ki:?".::::i*:::i:i:•::: :::::;:m.....:::„.:.:.:•••••.•'; ..::.:;::77::::::::: :::.•''.•:••••::••l••••:•••••".•:'••':•••• • f:1 ' -**4".A'; '*'' '''''•"*.'74 ; .- '. '''''' '' 'll': ::5:::::5•:::i':::M'g•'::*i: ;; ;•1031:5'::;A::::Mn',7. iii::;::. :, 'ff::.!•!.:....:.:'..:-::.--':::::;::'::.:::: :ii":•.':'':•:•-• •-':i:44 .14rC.::::6W'.: *R.CM :Nia:::.:':: : .i :MrA: , .APZW!'::',g14,„-gik,,,'Y'4,qi .:. •••'';:-:- ::- . . :.7:i:.x.): . : i:f[ it.:::::;%::.::::::::i.,1::.:ww:g.R*.iiiiiiiiiii.4i: :w .1 glaoATIt'v','':aimr:1:m -"7;i777 :i!,': 2:iii: :' il. ;!. .. .t -.t77.17.,i,i,m lisii.!:::,iiiikili"":1;;;:-:m.......iii:': ARgit . li; i!!!!::01:';;: i!!Zi; '•=•:::: .:7'!..'.:.;111;:iiii i,:'. ::;:;!::iiiiia ON K:.* 1-914-24'11..':::::: ..71'....:.::::.... „::::::::, •-----.7.''.'..7.!! : _r_ t 71.1;7.;fi'tv;',:;::1::::.:Ri$:-.i:0,:i:E.:io.::::1 Li•::::;1::;':. p:.:::,-:'::::.:•:.../I:!:(. 0.i:•Ali ,ii;i:,''i:..:F...:,..1.........::::::::::--;:::,-,7-.:,:t..::::::::.-7:::...1:.:':.:.::::: -..:.,..:i .::iigt:iiiii•giiiiiiii.m::::1 :i!'i.iii:ii':, i!:.',., ...)..,i'4.5.4.;:i%;:.:gm:::ni:?::::::; •t:i:.•"::,:,;! :::::.i.<:::::.:;L::::.L',.;•:.:,..zi • .. ',..„.„.„,,..,,,,,,_,.....•..,,: : :.:.::;.::::::,i::-:.---!,-,..,::-..:',1 ,.::i..-•.,:::.::::::::::.:::::::i:;.4,::::•..,.,,,,.::.:,...,:-:,: :::]: ,;.: :::„.,:.,,::....:::.,q,;,:,,t.A.,.,.i,jj:,., , ,:..m,,,,,,,,,:, r: :.:7,:,.-*0.04t.2n-2:,:o.:;:::,...!:;‘,.. .-::i.::.:1;:,:•.-,,,-:-;,:.:,,,,-,---7-....77.7.7'...:::-..;:.',..',.::•-..::..•:::.:j:,.i:.-::::.-::.,ii:i.::, .::::::::-:..:.:.:: ,•:',.,,.:,: :::.-.,:..:. ..:...:.i.,.i.:i.,-..,.:$,.]:.',,,:,::.:::::.•: ',.::- :.;,h•,,,.i.i:.-mig::: ::: •::.:.:: .121:':.: :::.:::::: i ::' .4,:ka5,:. ;:... ..:..,...- i',...,? :::'.--:::--:: -:....,:',..,.:,-„........:.::.:::: ::---.-..,.,,...,:::::::::: :.... :.::: : ::::::,i,: ::-;•. o,.. . ......::.; .i :::..:,z.::‘7p.. .:."... '. ...:,;"ai........:*) :':.wEV'':::::''''...-. N• bi.::,t::: :]::,;:.1].:::':•:;.i:: g wi:,:•::::i::::: ::-::'."::::::i::::.:i:Y::.::•:.,.,::ri::i.::::.'::•;;;;:•::.:.:.;.:.,::':...'...':.:::' .:•.;:::.''::::::::,...::::•::.,::?:,:.•:.:•'•.;.'..:•'...::.:•• •.-.:...:.::...:•:::.,:,::::.x::,:,..::::::::::::::::::::',::•:.;....,........:.,.;.;::::;:. ::,:mv:v:r...,. :...::...nW *4--'. :: :::*;:' ::::.'.:...:::.: :':,'..:,.-:.,1 ---zz • 1 .:...,::„:.:..i: ::E:: :::.:•:.,.:::]:::. .. i .' " ...,..,.?!if .:::::i:::i::•,r.,,ii:R:":•'.::. : ::i::. : •:::::,.::,:::-::::;.,•::::::i51,.::•:•:'•55 1, :cr'4.."MT5';';',;:;:;:;'4:5';5;;;;54 ::5;:%r...-r•: ;;.-::::.,,,:::',':':::::55:5 ,-55:<•• --.:::::::::::'i:‘;"•5;. .;;'•-':':" ..-i'.;::::: :;;, .,.„..;!::::•:::* •;5 :;:.;.,;:;:;:;;.5::"1.1:::; ;;;:',;;:y::::;•;',?:0 7 " :•>'''''''''':::•••••x4,v555.,•,•5:**:;`•::•*:"•,••:'::'*":.,;5'..e.,,,,, ,:,:•:,.::::•:•:•••:•••••••••. • ..• .-:::,:.55"••••.,:•.•.•::-.• ,::,:::::•,•,..5:.:.:...::.::•::::.:::::::*',...::•:.::::5••'•••••::':!,•,.::,.,•••,,,,••::,,,.,•:5::::,,...::::,:,?::•:,••:::::.::::;,.:::::::::::,:•••::;.::•.::::•;•;;,;.:::.......::::::••••.,:....,.....;.f:: / ::•.%•;/... :,:if).4A:.:::: :;,W:5:•:'''.:.: .,:.•:•.:::::'::,,::.;/". -.i:•;:!:,..:::•,':::::.,:•::::,;:.:...::•:.•:::::: .:.::::'5•;:•••;':.,• •:::5.:••:•,•,'.:..'•,;;:::::.:..:.:•:: :::::::.'•:•:::,:::::',•,..•,:,:;i•;:::*.:.,....i ,;:;::.5::::i:i:::::•:.::;::..i ::::•.;5:::::5555.••";•'."•'.!:.:;;•(...::,.:..,::;:i;,..:;i:m:,:,:;ii:::::,:55.'•,::,:•:•,:::.5::•...::::ii::. .:': 71 ,.......,.•4"!4i..,4:I:3::**5ifA,5505i''':.M . " :,::..5,•:*•55:•• :'.•'•:::::: '. 5.:•:::•,;: :•••'..:::ii*•:5.'i:'::***;":::'::::',:::•:::.;:•::::: :::::.•,:::::'*::::i'•5• r:::•"•,.5•:•;.:•:5):.*:;::„...].....:i...],,:5,';:::%i:::t:',i''.'.,',: ::.%5;Z: :•:•,k;:: :•:,:!•::*::•:;;I:::;:5],::::,::'•:::: .5 :i. *-1"1-- --* *]•kmr;<.;•:i.;•.,:-.:",::::A.,::'i,:l'.•; ;;:::::6iRi•:' 1'1..`..4°`'.*::::.: ::...::':•.::::.:.:•. ;;:,.,.::••••:•::1::„,:;i;';;:::3:.::::,..::: .=.:.;,:-, ;.%:•i,,,••!.•, -'•:::.:•.,i.:,',. ..:,..i:,.,:.,,:::.k•.:::.,":..,i,..i:::•':;:m:: .:;;••i4,:i:;]:.j.:.. ,..i:::.':Afi'i::a•l,'.:".;• ::, .;.:%:::i;..:.;,....,,,:,:,...;;-,, •—• Si.r;9.'15i!''...6'N*Vi:tia, .k..: :'':.:;W:',i;;Oi''' ':i:: ::::7':::::::':'.:;:.. i:;::;.,t:'••:4t5:1X:1;:::iiiiiii.:g4;4::Ig; '...*:i.::',',1,1;;;:':.::'.:i'.:*".7n:4;i*:E :;.M;Ii•EWi...i,:;L:L!' .:;J:i:•;.;•• •,r.f.• ": •:m:::•:::;:•::;*Mii;,;;;••;•:',•:•;i:,•.:,:,if.:,./ ' . . : i,,i, :7*...::]g] ::::].i],i..._,..::i.,i .:‘', :-.M...::!'::i.:R::::i:.]:.,:•:;,u.;;; .,.;,„.. .- .... .X...,V...1,,.. , .':.,, :;i:i:,-..0.4,,„,.;.,:,.:.:::..::::.::::.:.;i:::::..:,::,::•,:::::::::,::: ::',:.. ::.::, ;,::::::::-,,:..,..,:qii::•::ii:,:.,...:-..::.,?;...;:::::::,.-::i,::::::::•.::::::66.,...i....,:.: .-. ..›..,...,. ,-,,, Roads :.iiIM,'.ftZli.,& , ::::i:,::.•:1:.: ::::: :, : • i.:„.— <s -- N • z ,,,,,i,;,,)i,,,,*„.„i,i,,,:e:,,,,4,,, ,, ,,,:..;,,,,-,:„:,..,:„.,„:„,-„,::•,:•::::,.:-..::•.•:. •• imIncorporated Arms ,,?:-:mMt;.:.='; ';,;::'.-:•:.<::"...'y.. ' gm•+.--—- Paroaia 1.5 Urban 1 PiPotential inteAnn.mnax:tion Area NGrowth Area lino o.5 o Emma" • • propo«. AiJoseint PIEnrari •• =Emma • • Arse undo Urban Growth r"::•;••:•;:-...". MILES • 1994 i County PCDD .. _ East Are .,...4 Growth - -- a r Uh - 1 ssais, ...,......:i.„. U r ban • T.....,,.......:r:,:..:,i.i..;-:::..i..%.i:.........:....:...1..:.....:„::.-::..„,:.:.::.:i:L,i.I:.:.::.:.*ii.„ii„il..Lii......:i:i....i:i:..i.i:il:..i:iii:t...:,.,if::.i:i:i:.:.ic..§i...Z.,..iti.:fi:..i::ii::,.i',ii,.:ii::,::i:l::i::,:i:i'iiI.:i:A:i::..:...il:iiA,::;.h,,:i.,.::.,.:ii::..:.:l4,,ii.1i::i.r‘.4:.i.,i,i.i,,ig,.i,..i:.•.:i::.:i.:.:"i:,i,';.„;:s:....:.;'-A,:.,:..::,.:,...,,•,il...:'..::"g.:,.:',s:o:l::),.,..:a:::::wN,.....i,.,i......eI..::.i1-:1iIi:ti•vn%$o,::ii::ioi%iii.i's.i.::..V*ii..i::f::.::.:i::o..:•,.:..4.:..4:5..l!1:.:.-m!,..!:.!.::4.1,:,i.sirii.iii:ka-§:.lg,i.,.ii:..:ir.::i:..iiiT..,r.,7.,..;=—it..'.1m i-=a-ltm u,—i..-.1a-n.imi,.m..t.,,..,,il.m..,;g.,p,!*.,-t.,u..!aw,.1l!a,il0.uii••:l f•::p::.:,lrk:si'77f':•.t.i ioi..i.0,.egr:.,2"i:..•-6.°s,i.iL'.f.lit:ila..i*.....a.i..'..:::.:ii...::..i.,.:.i.:N,tvi•:§g,,i.ili:ii:ie.i•i.ii.i•iM w.ii•;ua..:::iAVti::.ioi:•::.•*;i:-%,:„.‘.i'':7,•„.:..:i.;::.4V.4lt.......•..i':ii:r.„pi-".1.:..;.i`,..i:i,:g::1::r0:....i.:.i..:i_!...::,i.iI:=-7tii:::0'i.:i::,;:::.i.0,.i-::v.:.At.:.i::i::eit.:i:..i1::i.ii.:*1tc4i,.:;%4::,.4iii;::_:;,..%.:4d fri-1::....f:4:i.:::,.1:0.i.i.;r:..,:,.".:i1:i;:....g.::.s:i*...:1„::-::37:4.::.6:•..::!:•.,.*;:i.5:7:.i::./.i.7*:7i4.:A.,.:r:i,iii*:i.:...:tiA.t.i:i::M::.•.i:t,.i:,l!;„:.:.A.i§!iili:.O*::'.::......si:I.:....e;....:"..k.f..:..„f.::i:...:.'.:::L*i,:..:„...:.:.i.,t-.•,-.i„.„i:-,„K::,:..i:..:::..:i.i::,f:.;..::„:'.i.-.::„...::l:.•..,.::t:i.:.:,",:i:.g:,.,:...%ii-:.,ifl.:?:,:.;.;"„...:.i:::.i:,.r,..!.::;,.i:.::.-.i,.-:if:t,:.,i,:.::.l..::ii:,7i::i:::,..;:%;.I:..,..,.:iii::,.::.m:.:4.*..„ii:.,i..i:::v•;i„"1i:.....,:;i..*i,.i.;:,.N..,.1.i;:;..:?::::l:*...::iii.:..i*:.‘t::.,.i..:.;i:.*.•„:eic.::!:l:::::..:.li*!::.:.;::i:.:,.,-;..:ii:.7i:ii*e.1i:.:i:i..:i::*:iiK:i i:i.ii.:.':i:;iiW::5:'2 x,:ti,,,:,i:.•ii.:,.i:,:.:,„.:i,...:iH., . %, K „ : .::..i.;.:ti.,-:::i:„::::::::.:4:.:..,.:A:::t::,,•:::„i:•..:i-;.:*>::::,N..„:i:.•:.i::•.4:.::..i:i::i„:..M.:.ik:::::„i.:::'„,„.,:i:.;:*t..i!„;•.e..:!:I,:.4':.:i.i,.i,::.7::i..i:„i:i..::.:;i„,,:.:,:;:,.-.i..:,.."..:i..;....:,.i::i.,.i.,.:....i:i..,.i.:,.:„.i.::....i..,.l:„;;„,i,i.*::.i:.:;:tir..:.:p::i...,,i;,:,;:...*:...,::.•., l 1. -s ,:;:::.7.,:.:.:!:..:,,.:,::.:.::i:..:.„:?:M,....i...:::.„.:i:..,:i..:iii„.*i..4:::.....i:„.,F.:.:.i:•...„i,.:.*....t.:,§..„.„,m.::,:,.:i,::i,.,.,:„:::i„,)i::ii„..:::;.:,..:,:.i,i..4:•'i:....,•...ii,.::i..$l„..ii..:..'i.%i..,i..,k::„.'.i::,:4.:':::::::.':,:4:i„:::-*:t.::.::..-.::f:4i..:::,ic...„::•.„..i,i::':::]i...:•.,:.;..si...:,i„i..1:•::..i..,.::::i-::i..441::;:,4:,„:.:...4._.:1::,.7.::..„',.,„°.„•,:„':1,::.],0A lnvl„;4 : . . o . 0 • % : MC4 . ,.,i::i::i;:.1,...1•kit...,::i:..:«.,;4c..i.:4;..„,„.::4...:•i:„i1'.,,*„o::.t,-:,:.„.•:k„•..i.:::t.,.:.:.:.•i•,:*:..t.•:::..::,i.:•.„i.....::.r:ii•„i„„,:i.,.,::.:'L',,...,,:ii,;..,::",: :,..:•::.•,,- :.:.. ..., !:. ...,iliii*::::...:.........::.:iii,iimii.ii.:::.4.:::.,:: ii.:4..,::::„....,,,::,:::::4„.. ..iilii::ilm::::: :::tni-ii::..„...iiil.„:.:: ::1,.1:0:11:iiiiiiiiii.:.:::::_clw. ,„,,:111 •::,.:::::.i.1::i::::,P4'.1.11 . it ;:lii;ii::::i:i: 7f.:;,;...;M:::':: i'...iiiii::::1Mi]:.;:ii:,....;i;i*:.':::::::::::::;:.:iii:::iiii.iisi\''.....:"::.:::: :•.1 .i3.:::'.::":::,!* .tag.g'I'' 4.>::::.. ....'.'....i.;.:....:..a.:'''''''''''''l ...,•.:.,,.::::.:::::.:..*i::-:::: .k:*.....:::::.:..*'.'*...:!::....:.......:.:::.::::i..:i:i.ii:il':i:.::ii...r.....0:..,0.-t.::::::i*.ii „,..1:1.,;1;,,,,-. •• „..,,,,:,, ,:i.,,,,..,44„,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,:„..:0: 4,,,:,::::,,,,,,,:,....... •••„:::,::,::,.::::,:„„,:„, ::.„. ...:,:„...... ........"......,...,...„ . .Ed,,,,,,,,,,::,:„.:4,..........„..,,,,.i,.,4::?::::':::,...,,ii:ii,:i1.1 .::,: ......::::.....:.•...,,,,"-...•!.....••••::::,:ii, ..,.i.i.::•::i%iiii ,..-:.........::::::).iiiiii•P4...;:,:.:,:-•:::.....,....-:i:iiii§ ......„„„„::::,:„,„ ....:„...::„,„„„„„„„„,•:„„„,::.:.:•••••,:::;•••••....,r .Lir: .... :i..,,i„„::.?:...1., ....„:::::::,..........• :*%ii..iit. :;*,:: -6ii:,. ,;:i:::.:i.:::'...:........,:;:ii:ii:i:: i::ii ,::..........,::::.:*iv.,0m,.. •... ..... ,.,.. . ... ... .;,..<„...•,a ,....,....;;.i?...::::::::.?:ii.,::•'''''.. :iMi§;:''''"....-.....:::::i;• iiiiiiii%1::: :::::::::::::::::::riti::::iii;;iiiii **.:''''........:.....":::..%:$1k,Z;isi.ii : ..::::::::: „.....:::.:,,:::::::r:.....:....,-.....-.i..:,,,•:,.?,.W.,::::.]...-....::',:,,;.........il•..t sA:Li:...,1:.:.::::.:::.:*„iiiii-iii:::: '..5.ii::::.iii.i:'.. .ii$:4Pt:::::i:il.:::: . .: :::4;s9'...7::.:::::.::::::: ,......... Y....'......4,.' 1:!!!!t'..71!':.r4*.,...ft::.::::.:::: ___I:i4i. il?::i::::ii:ii .i:......::.:* ,.---.:,:xweri.:::,...4:.:.:-.-....,„...,xx...... x... .e.,:.:,::.:..........:. ::•;Z:::ei ::.,..'.,:'•:•i.'..:•..„•.:: .-........,.:.."..:,,.i:.:•..:..,„....L.L!.,':••......;: 't::::"::.,,:':',„:;.„..4,, ..•.. .....•::::::i.::i%0-4.i:.I,:.::,•4:.:5i,..ii:::::.•];',;..•...„...?..ii::i;:::00,:::::::ii::ii.:iitiiki iiiI::i.itiiiii. ...iiiiii;"i.ilii:.::::.0 yi,•.::,.:'.:::.',1;1..ii*iii.15.::1;:iiiiiitk:lims!A 7.s:::‘:...:.......,-...•••,•':,,,,..-- .::-••::....:-.i,.. ..:, ..,:-.•-•....•:,.:.,•....::..:•:•:•.-,t,......,:l..-.7.".liwivisitai,:,.i-t.6.-k,..),........... ,:i:t.... .:Aiiiiioi . ...iiii.i.:ii::R:ilitii g.iii.:.ii.ii..itt::::•..:::. ;Ii..11.4....:.4;:,.E ,..:;iit ...:•,..:. .:-......a iitmitiiiiiiamig .•1::. :..;..::i'....i. .:.:::-...i..:.''.::::':..::.'.:i...,..:.:.i!:,::::.....i.::.:::..:.......7.:.'........ci-;.... .-,...-.::.::::.:E i:.:..:..:........................................................................................ .............. Liiiiiilli fliiiiii:.?.......-::::....- .-.'::II...;..:,:i ..................................................................................................................:.::::.'...::::::'':''...'. ..:,-i..:.:.-:::::....-..::.........;;;;-..,'...,..::::::' '•.......::::::',......:;..:..':',,f,'::::-.,....:.' ' • .. ,.... ..*...:-.„,,:,:::::..:....i.::::::::i: .....:::-,:: ::::. ...ii:...:............,.....,..:,.:.:::'::-.:.:.... ........:...,...:::::.:::.......:.:::•'... .... .....:.....:.:::::::•.,.....,:i.'......,:-,'. ..:,...;i::„.....i..::::„....::.1.,.,:,..1.:,Ii....:...i...:.:-....:?..::..:..K.-.,.:...:.,i L,L,.-,,,,...:,..'...:i.,,r i:..:i.:I.::...:,..is..:E°,.......,.;',,..:....':3'1 L..•-H-:,_:.::,!1:1,:::::::111:1.......::::' 31:1'.... .:'....t:'.1,i;,:i.::.:',.-::.:i''..i!'':;...:'.,'-:..::::?'''..i..::.'1.1;1 ::::::::1.''.:::: "...,...:.,!.11:1'..;::.:':.:..........':::.....1:..::.:..,..'1.i:'':-.'1.1:..:':..;..:!''i''1.:".:.:.::!!:1.1.. • g 1 ;,::;:::„.....,..,;„„„...„....;;„;,,,,...;:,,i,,.:,„:.;•;..,,;,.,.",...;,,._.; :,..,:„..::,,,,:::,..„..„;,.....-.„..-.;„.;;,,,::::..-....it;.-;:„.-„,. 7:..- , .... ... „ ._,,.... .,„.....:,.„,..„.„ ,..; -7. i.. ..,....,,.:,,,;,,,,;,,,...:„,,,,,,,;:;,,,„,,.,,r,,;:,;::::,.:.•„i„. ,...„..,,ii....,....:::,:„.,....., I - ,.••••.:--7-..7, ,,.L-.,,i:.,.:...-...,-,.:„•:-...:.:.,,,•....,.I,..•.,. ..:.•.... :.,.:c.. ;;.••;--..:.::•-..,..:....,:.-..::.....•:-.„:•:::.--....,...::::.:,:.• ....... •-•:•",..."::.:.::,..•. ;;.,.... _ •:-.,..t,::..-:,,,,::: ?..,:...-.,::...••:::.::::.:...::::'..':;:.:,'..:.::::::,--_-:::.:4.,`,L.:',.:E: :;.:".,?;,';',...t'.,-.•:::::•.::',i'::::*:::::::.:::]-:-:,:....,.:',-;,::::;:i., .L..i:-:::::::::::.:::::: 11:.;.ii:.::,...,...iiiii _-T—I ..........:.::.:::.----:::-..•:••:::: :•-•.:-:„; :•":-...--..: ::::::•:,•,•:•.•••,.,...,,,..,....-....: .:•„•-•.:.:.--:.ii ..:...::::,, ,,,,,,t,,i.:::,....,::::....:...:,',::...,•:: .... ...t.L':..•.:,...•...:i:...:::::,..,...i.,,::.-,!:r..il,i,!::„,::::-..:::; .„ ,•:..,1,,,,,i;-,:...5:0,..;....., ,I:t! ,:..:p:,r.7,:..•,,!!:,•:.E,-,:...--,:,:...!,,,...,:::::::!,-.:..i;::..g::::::,,,:ii...,!:,..p..iio,....,-,.1i.:...,::::,!..1..::::::-.... ' '....::.;,..LY:':::;:.::4' I ........- 40, . . .......-L::::„:....... i.;:::..-. .,-.::::....:;....4...:...c.....,:...."..,::;:,L:,-.:,. ,..--:-.--L,-..:::_:,,:.::"...:.,.,...:::.:.,:i:::;-,4;.,:„..,::,-..:.:::::::: ::•:-,:-. :::.::-......."..::?..::....,:i-..:-,m:::::.::.......;:::.:::::::,:::::::::.::: L._ ! ....„. -....L..,::,...-L,A;:::.: .•..,:..,:ii.i.,';i:LL,,,-.:.::::-..,..]:::-:.:,L,:..-?:-.::::::-.:-. :..::,:-.-L:L......;:..:,:..i...st,...::,--::::: .7.:..,:::.......-L.:.::...::::.i., oz. .:.-•-: :--'•.-•:',:.-::::::ii4Liii i .i..---- ... ,(....,Til..;,..:::---,.:::•:::•-;-::::::.iii:,.'-.. 4.E:-..:::.•••:-.:!::;:•,.•,•-::::,::::::...:::::,..,:, .. :-:;:.......:•..]:::..44:-.:::.:•:-.:•:-...•::::...,:::.,•1...::::iv,:::•..:11'.:.:.' ,..':;!1•:,44..::.';'.:-.,.:...:;:::::.7:7....:E. ..._?— ...... ....-- '.:,:i:-:.4.,:-..,:-..'.,::::;:::.:',•,:;;.',.t•L'":'.:. ..::; ::: :.. ...•!:. ::.....::.....i!. .--.I..,. !...1:....i.,Iii...34',:-:- : ..,.'...,•...,.ii....: :::.'.E:-..i,,T.,..L...,....:,,,,---....::1-- . .i •:.L.-:::-.,.::....iii:.!,-.,.:-..;-:::::,-,,,,4.q..":::.',...,.:.•,:,.z- q... i..:.,..:,. .i,-:-..,:•7:p::::: '.i:::::-::.:..:: :-.-.:',', . .,...!.•:......:ii.-.:6,-,..:Ii..,--,; k: ::-..i------ ..._----- I 7---1 .. .',..i:i.':''''.':..!.:.':-...:-.. i,....s;t :',.,Ii-:;.,:.:.j.'.:.q,:.:::!.:,.'...:,.,:.,,';', ::: :. -...::4-...t.....::::i.: •••• ••,:-..iii.:i.t':: .'....!,..-:,.I' :: 12:.3._7---. 1 --• .:.:.-1.:.!:•;.::::::-...,,,::::..i...J.Rq:',2..;:::•..,i;:;.:::,. ...:,:i:-F..-Lii.....7..:::.,:*...:.:L.,,,....:::.....:.,. .............:......,..:,....,:.....,LL,,..........::::z. .,,......,_ :;,,:.!i:.. ......._ ..---- r- e ,....:.:1:.;.. "!...iii: '. . -':.1..:Z::1Z.. I ..-4--*".-1 . ------ ,.. ....... ...„.„„..,.........,... _L---- . ,....,...:,•,.•.......,:,,......,,....,:-.....::::::..,..• ....... _....... _ ::::...... it. -,,...:::•.,..:::,...,,,,:„:•.....,,,,....i.,:::,.....:.....,,,...... .....,....- ::.:ii. ..-...,,:,,....,,-...,,,,,•..),... - , •::',.:-...'.:-::.-........-...'.-.:<•....-..:::;-.,;:-.,...i,.1.--:: ...:-.,-7--2.—i--" 1 ••••• Roads ,,•.,,,•.,••• .....„.....„._4_a_...,,:L.:L:::...:- "• t...,L-:,-,....„........... !,'„......-LrF --1,__ •••••••••4'kP_______„,...,_,....w•H ‘$?...]:.:::•.::',•:-:::-::: !•••,4 -1111...1..- /V .... 6.•••-•• i --:'.--- Is ...._ Ay." : •.1 Par°. ed -- -......— I . ;,.....•-• - Incorporated Area (lir ' M „cation •4 joint -;.--.. I ,..- ArIrl. ••;.;::4 ie4 86 — tential ia•Sa. . . ----- po C2. urban Interim line i Into 9- 19 Growth IV.. h • Al Growth 2 Proposed urban 1.5 pro, Line • 40.• Ars.' •41, 1 . 0.5 MILES j ntY - pcDD 1994 r March 21. 1994 Nair Renton City Council Minutes Page 117 Utilities Committee Utilities Committee Chair Schlitzer presented a report concurring with the Public Works: Private recommendation of the Planning/Building/Public Works Department that Latecomer's Agreement Council allow separation between the City-Held latecomer process and the Regulations Private Developer-Held latecomer process and therefore the creation of one Public Works: Special new ordinance (Special Assessment District Ordinance - SADs) and revision to Assessment District the other (Private Developer Latecomer Ordinance). The Utilities Committee Regulations further concurred with the recommendation of the Planning/Building/Public Works Department and recommended that Council accept the two latecomer ordinances as submitted and that Council request both latecomer ordinances be adopted. MOVED BY SCHLITZER, SECONDED BY TANNER, COUNCIL CONCUR IN THE COMMIT t"EE REPORT. CARRIED. (See later this page for ordinances.) Transportation Committee Transportation Committee Chair Edwards presented a report recommending Transportation: Commute that Council authorize the Mayor and City Clerk to execute the interlocal Trip Reduction agreement with King County to receive approximately $93,658 in State Agreement, King County Technical Assistance grant money to be used for the implementation of Renton's commute trip reduction plan. (Renton's allotment for the first year of the State 1993-1995 biennium is $46,829; the second year's actual allotment is based on the number of affected worksites in Renton as of March 31, 1994.) The Committee further recommended that the resolution regarding this matter be presented for reading and adoption. MOVED BY EDWARDS, SECONDED BY SCHLITZER, COUNCIL CONCUR IN THE COMMITTEE REPORT. CARRIED. (See later this page for resolution.) Comprehensive Plan: Transportation Committee Chair Edwards presented a report recommending Urban Center Boundary concurrence in the staff recommendation to amend the boundaries in the Amendments southern portion of the Proposed Urban Center to remove employment areas located generally south of South 7th Street and to add adjacent residential uses located on the western edge of the Mixed Use Core. MOVED BY EDWARDS, SECONDED BY SCHLITZER, COUNCIL CONCUR IN THE COMMITTEE REPORT. CARRIED. Mr. Edwards explained that this action reduces the total housing density requirements for the Urban Center. ORDINANCES AND RESOLUTIONS Resolution #3044 A resolution was read authorizing the Mayor and City Clerk to enter into an Transportation: Commute interlocal cooperative agreement with King County entitled "Commute Trip Trip Reduction Reduction Act Interlocal Agreement." MOVED BY EDWARDS, SECONDED Agreement, King County BY SCHLITZER, COUNCIL ADOPT THE RESOLUTION AS PRESENTED. CARRIED. The following ordinances were presented for first reading and referred to the Council meeting of 3/28/94 for second and final reading: Public Works: Private An ordinance was read amending Chapter 5, Latecomer's Agreements, of Title Latecomer's Agreement IX (Public Ways and Property) and subsection 5-1-1.B.1 of Chapter 1, Fee Regulations Schedule, of Title V (Finance and Business Regulations) of City Code relating to private latecomer's agreements. MOVED BY SCHLITZER, SECONDED BY TANNER, COUNCIL REFER THE ORDINANCE FOR SECOND AND FINAL READING ON 3/28/94. CARRIED. Public Works: Special An ordinance was read amending Title IX (Public Ways and Property) by Assessment District adding Chapter 16 entitled "Special Assessment Districts," of City Code Regulations establishing the authority, procedure, and rate of interest for Special Assessment Districts. MOVED BY SCHLITZER, SECONDED BY TANNER, COUNCIL REFER THE ORDINANCE FOR SECOND AND FINAL READING ON 3/28/94. CARRIED. A73 j-Lt- TRANSPORTATION COMMI I-1 EE COMMITTEE REPORT MARCH 21, 1994 AMENDMENT TO THE PROPOSED URBAN CENTER BOUNDARY (Referred 3/21/94) The Transportation Committee recommends concurrence in the staff recommendation to amend the boundaries in the southern portion of the Proposed Urban Center to remove Employment Areas located generally south of S. 7th Street and add adjacent residential uses located on the western edge of the Mixed Use Core. Bob Edwards, Chair 6 Timothy J 1 ' zer, Vice Chair Toni Nelson, Member cc: Gregg Zimmerman Michael Kattermann h:\p&ts\urbctr.doc Nome *vied August lb. 1993 Renton City Council Minutes Page 365 Transportation Referred 8/9/93 - Transportation (Aviation) Committee Chairman Tanner Committee presented a report recommending concurrence with staff in the approval Transportation: of a resolution authorizing the Mayor and city clerk to enter into an Monster Road Bridge interlocal agreement with Washington State Department of Transportation Replacement, WSDOT (WSDOT) to receive federal monies in the amount of $1,120,000 with a 20 Interlocal Agreement percent City match of total project costs in the amount of $280,000 for the Monster Road bridge replacement. MOVED BY TANNER, SECONDED BY NELSON, COUNCIL CONCUR IN THE COMMITTEE REPORT. CARRIED. (See later resolution.) Councilman Stredicke questioned whether work on Martin Luther King Way, on the other side of Monster Road is scheduled to be completed within a specific timeframe, and also if King County will add controlled turn lanes because of the dangerous intersection. Mayor Clymer stated he will look into this matter. Lease: LAG-73-005, Referred 8/9/93 - Transportation (Aviation) Committee Chairman Tanner Puget Power & Light, presented a report recommending approval of Addendum 06-93 to LAG- Lease Extension 73-005, with Puget Power, and authorization for the Mayor and city clerk to execute the Addendum. MOVED BY TANNER, SECONDED BY SCHLITZER, COUNCIL CONCUR IN THE COMMITTEE REPORT. CARRIED. Comprehensive Plan: Councilman Tanner reported that an article appeared in the Valley Daily Urban Centers News addressing increased crime on Kent's East Hill, and requested that comments he wrote about this article be entered into record. In his commentary, Councilman Tanner noted that the reporters concluded that the cause of the increased crime is primarily due to the extreme high density of housing and people on the East Hill. He further stated that the problem is so severe that businesses are modifying their hours of operation, and that Kent officials may challenge the population growth figures assigned under the Growth Management Act. He continued that if Renton's land use designations and zoning are fully developed, multi-family housing will comprise more than 70 percent of the City's housing units, and thus perpetuate a future decline in quality of life. Mr. Tanner felt that recent zoning decisions in Renton are similar to those made in Kent, and were motivated by objectives of increasing the revenue stream and property tax base by permitting development without regard for consequences. In response, Council President Edwards concurred with the majority of Councilman Tanner's comments, but stated that the Fiscal Analysis/Economic Development Task Force for King County/countywide policies has been addressing the potential problems associated with urban centers. Mr. Edwards stated that the Kent East Hill should not be considered a model for an urban center because affordability, and not type of land usage, is the issue. He also noted that urban centers as designated in Renton's plan have valuable land that can be used for commercial or up-scale and expensive housing, and stated that problems occurring on the Kent East Hill point out that urban centers do not solve the countywide problem of affordable housing. / WAKE UP CALL FOR RENTON Mr. Mayor, at the last Council/Staff Retreat , conducted by Mr. Eric Allenbaugh, the theme was "Wake Up Calls" . This, as you may recall, is the occurrence of some event that lets us know that all is not well , and suggests to us that we should modify the behavior that caused the event . We have just received such a wake up call from our neighbor- ing city to the south in the form of articles in the Valley Daily News which point out the deterioration in the quality of life of Kent 's East Hill . The headline is stark, Mr. Mayor. It reads "Crime, Crime stalks the East Hill" . The reporters rightly con- clude that the cause of the problem is the extremely high density of housing and people on the East Hill . They point out that Kent currently consists of 63% multi-family housing, most of it dense- ly concentrated into a two square mile area, with 60% of the City's population being renters . They give one of the best de- scriptions of an Urban Center that I have seen to date. That is "Too many people living in too little space" . Kent is now facing the consequences of development and land use decisions originally made twenty to thirty years ago by King County, and more recently by Kent. The problem is so severe that businesses are modifying their hours of operation, and there is an inference that Kent will challenge the population growth figures assigned to them under the Growth Management Act and may downzone some land currently zoned multi-family. If the recently passed land use designations and zoning in Renton are carried through to development, our problem will be more severe than that existing in Kent today. Multi-family hous- ing will make up more than 70% of our housing units, and our housing density per acre, particularly in the downtown area, will far exceed that of the East Hill . Recent land use and zoning decisions by this City have set the stage for a future decline in our quality of life. These decisions are eeriely similar to those made by King County and Kent for the East Hill , and were motivat- ed by the same objectives of increasing the revenue stream and the property tax base, by permitting increased development with- out regard for the inevitable consequences . Mr. Mayor , it is rare that a real life model of the re- sults of land use and zoning decisions is available to policy makers and politicians in advance. Too often we have to depend on computer simulation and speculation for such results. We in this City have been given a rare opportunity, by the example of East Hill , to reevaluate the critical decision we have made to cram masses of people into a tight little enclave in the downtown core, and our decision to discard the policy that the ratio of multi-family/single-family housing will be held to 50/50. I hope that 10 to 20 years from now you will not have to rationalize and explain these decisions, as did Ex-Mayor Isabel Hogan of deci- sions made during her tenure as Mayor of Kent . T SUNDAY Valle'fr' ' evvs erving South King County since 1889. August 15,1993 Volume 105••No.194 • r j • • stalks the Easf H�11 By CHERYL MURFIN and JEAN PARIETTI _y,•,dir Valley Daily News ,), ' ti &SrrV , KENT - From shoplifting to h yam` / ; n� �, shootings,crime is giving East 1. J V i �l Hill a bad name and scaring • and frustrating shopkeepers. • City leaders,concerned'about the increasing reports of violence,are ~? l...%. „i discussing slashing any further apart- p,;'f ment building, toughening up l 1144A11:'': 'I 'i• .1a, enforcement of building codes,and \ g, Iii _ possibly charging fees for extra \ - ` police protection. ;�" •t, !� Police already have beefed up : r, t patrols of the East Hill area and Lia promise to vigorously attack what . residents,apartment managers and shopkeepers sec as a trend toward violent crime. • Perhaps too late,city officials have learned that cramming hundreds of • - " people together in what are essential-. "*' ' 'tli"`i ly mini-communities doesn't always - - " have the best results.Some commu- - pity leaders ruefully point out that the housing decisions made 20 years no doubt have contributed to the current - problems. • Valley Daily News photo by DUANE HAMAMURA On East Hill alone,in an area less Sgt.A.J.Emerson and officers Lisa Gulllkson and Randy Bourne patrol the parking lot at the Quail Ridge Club apartments. than two square miles,75 complexes }� �a} of various sizes make up nearly one- Ken i s apa.`men s■ Too:many Kent East Hill Apartments third of Kent's total living units and an estimated 30 percent of the popu- lation. people living in too little space Conflicts are almost inevitable �� when a large population is packed By JEAN PARIETTI - codes at the'city s 200 apartment corn- into so compact an area Valley Daily News Units pat carnal t, P `plexes,charging fees if extra police pro- Minor crimes have always plagued KENT-Gunfire that erupted at the ".tection'isineeded,-and eliminating the *- 50-100 I dame:St.'''240th S, East Hill convenience stores, but Quail Ridge Club apartments twice this remaining multifamily zoning on Fast today merchants say both the magni- month has heightened fears that Kent's and West hills are just some of the ideas rude of the crimes and the attitude of apartment complexes are aging violent- being debated. '�100-200 the young people involved have ly,rather than gracefully. The actions of city councils and King •' changed. "We've got to take a proactive County over the past 30 years have cre- It over 200 t "Three years ago this was like a ated the traffic,crime and safety prob- approach to some of these complexes, neighborhood,•"said Gladys Sills. lems that current city council members ""`""` because they're going to start deteriorat- �— general manager of the Circle K con- i❑ are struggling to solve. t, "SE 248th St.- venience store at Southeast 56th r."We City ant the city mat Leona Although some of them sat on the Orr."Wedon't want the city to turn into - a real slum area." t I , y See CRIME,A5 Stepping up enforcement of building - See PEOPLE,AS t li.' • t M mu It's Just not the little Kent 'Now they're ripping off 'Everybody wanted more '') ?5fith St !-_ s we all remember. We didn't whole cases of beer or all the people In Kent,because you CO Sf ,- have all the traffic you see cigarettes ... and standing could sell more'cars and more ^z here now and all the angry there laughing at you because groceries'and more building ' fH .\ .Q = , faces on people driving by they know nothing will happen materials and build more ''\ o,�,- Jr ., t or all the apartments.' to them. It's•really scary.' schools.' t t4nb.,,I wa ,Jtl ,national ameaeaa Colleen Mitchell Gladys Sills Former Mayor Isabel Hogan harm:city lcat May nay News'papilla by HAMS LIMO' "L O - N N" N NT N c t- .. . -' > N • ' V _ >N 1 CU ,, . -0 ApL.. Co. v � Nf. C T: N ,; b� IG _ =3 U O = > N •• N 00U ° >F E5 , o f �rS,.oay o $ a . E 3 ' .n'vcr.4 3 .„.ya -�n c y L>,S-6roc o v- c RL a) c ¢ u uG°v = opaoHoc h- �gE Go aooL ` • o c ` :8u •._,, ° . .Duc ` = " EEo'=Hu uNR E.25;0 t- Z•vy _° ` � gcP. 0 u c V5N3y E.9 wNOCTy aR G y•0Ey ° GCCb' L a•' F N OL E.EC = E o K u.b N •• u9Nn:' ,, 0 t ' 3j( u° 3 u Uv .R `ou au° E °s- 0 u Nu ux 0 GOE OU E. ON�Lcc _, N 0' 0> R.C_ ts.� TvL >N-RN •E� Ra N c-° E .-;- O ` j` N G4 N c Jao caiR r•�L ca ^ U y OUU CXTEO.CO E 'L'c.- '0 'dla C CY°fl . V O aUNWL uL=tE w 0GAEOv'= N c SN RN.Gw•" E'C EROE2CYs3cNti NL N u'gs CR so RN N 4b T. voo ao.D p u 3X� L ..• p.._ v0 OC v'L ucRy `auJc.0 _= V .y E lti. RN .E ip R �Ev N`= E'C-C E D j,L N`- c,pHN > o N.0. 3 ,, : c R rE x Cy3].... i U TL oo=3ER0 -0 • u >.8 -0y== y,A CL R ,. ° OO -O oxo � >, E. oaa� ucuEo: 72m= 2,_ cC xu �oaOCR �O-g2x o ERsg•�REoGo� OR - R = " .] eaE� E3T'`U�=oENo �xcp >L. z7. 0yen uur Uw V E.`s H a) F t o =u° S''" °)"-Cgo ct o•_u y� o.A.9s L Ec c• R,EE.°i � Gn.T-sg� N Lcc= _: 6 ,i No u °Ts5') 10 F. ' p + R R> VN : = RcTmE- Ea ORoa= ac'-' mR .. :5 ' 3 0ouy= Ecyso'c ' iLa' y o ° ao= R oE E =. 32 aodRy: u u u "- ;v •ma - - A . ? P 32 ti,F R csT a 3 a ae 9x n F. Ex N u N. �N.. -o c3 = v v m-3 u a` v @ NN c E00�c OL Y 0c= .g . • o3D 'cN % ° o7,3cc o c 0 a: __c c _ o = > a = O3 $. �= E R0_ & EEucGn saR t : GOc o-Nbyy 0 ° N -0 yrE , 0R NyL x O3o u �R C oLEOT•- -c a: N OO N CI co.t NNQ O O C N�0 -nL L T'..CUo ` RO.L N.`C ay rnR � 39 Ud- ' C .. > a� 3c oy o cv i, u i° ax'otEvb ELb-N Rv'6_. roc c' ou° . N Nlb0 !Li CR yv�e h Y � a oCB ` a"' au_ 0 ° �mc ao� R L o " E y � a� u E� R Eou ,-= Ot,o �N ENRGL: aa> 0 2au� ocHL `.00uR „y T ° Uto s �L Nu Vu TV- Lwa V N O. NNO•v =bERY-° _ Cc0V. T-x0 I V Eou 3s aEu .- h _ E °'m .e 0 -emsoE II! I 3ct uyy c .--, 7 E c a °u . C_0•m v> u at ` ' >, R •2 --C c ° ° V ° N °_R >. Y Lay C NA E pJ utiN- E ° o Gpc •oa-909�s'cy °z-E(.,„I. pu- ' Z o c- 0 La. NRo. Ru c"a .Emsc�ac.bE•u E au°'c.c o cn o = c'o, 'ooW•• u v V 3Lcuo0 C NNNx` R H R...°`2 N •,, °.. u °h 8 u•a E E 0 ° ae : ` u'm y G N.4: ,N t: •oNo _�-cmvc uLty -. a••y- u c yLu g o R o=L a o6oL+u R U E V ,.,Fyv c GO` o v- o UT b`H u R R4:-cLR A C0 O..° LN •° En�LW P. .a-_,-, � TN �N UvL•_ TN � Nr ,N L' a- cF c E = e 0 = ` `o E''' L W NFL u'0•L¢ Nc o� E cc 'xT �¢ aLN °C R E yN ~ Q..0}0'' - .°L p U N g N�- SN R C- x 0 ° U °' 8. d ' N H aav A� cs E a- °' No >, = cFE -5c r 0o - -_ o .- 13 ae••` T„, N N^^. N G " =•+ N = N C L C ., 00 ,n C '•.• ' N- - R y N C N '0., c0 N b-- R t' ,V•O u N._'O.0 • O._ C N R C O': C,C G C E ' U D . 'O C R o E. �+ ;9 R •N"' a? x o o = = o y� E R u - o u 2 'd o ,N. 4.-ux 3'Nx h c u N 3 x.0 �t 3 o u. x y o'C H E y ` m E c 3 , os aub R o ❑. r yry o o s: ELb a,i u L a. °L c c ° '- u o^ " � _ .. E ° c E u�v T N R T W C�`O•= O ,0 E -s R = N R C .y ,-C•C •'cd C R O .-,- RODu `d33 AUc > c0 ;FAy ,°i,'au_88cl>], r.aRiW2 coE" ' 2,oca�c2..to =: RO= =. c N °o_ c5 3 Le)L-. R R = L vw R 0 y g. R ° E Gq 3 rn >. _ '' `° E 0 0 > R R �- R ° y '-°i _ W E R ' y'0,c j C N ° C -c.:.°O ° N ,. L E.6 °� C• O N T y- O 8 4 y R V .R•- y E�' u ,d R `4-0 " 3 = 0.- TCL N R O aj.7O ° c_•C E _:� .au c �vE ° TX uT?' 3 m� �3E,co3yu °' Dyx:? c= Eou �.=o -v.o8ytH' o -,, 0)-° a` R Gyco.9ro T.L. E9 € c,o o h R ' p a0s. >,- s A 'v E a 3 ��a8 R >,u c =E 5 oC7 �, O U R N . C J - U y C E o ° s N b y °� o R a s >u Ha.E °csu ° 3 = N U N'= E u.uc�,n - c- o E__0 c -•!aC a'O U C.c >>L . C .n - H =- j,0 R N•-• w N. o N y = E i0^ u w �, °- V i._ `y N N N N O R_-. `,•O y -c L_ U-0 .p. Y N v. rx I?'N E-- a > R R % N N I N E 7 C y TLCF Q% y v� 0 ti ��p RRi,O tCd R'O C °3 R =.E- z.E-0 0 0 RF OO �0 E TGO. ° 0_ E C N.C- 8.v O 3 H'. 3 ,[-''L 0 t>d_ ,• N all N c1.2 O N 3 a, . )a -O O,-,, Ra ...,, _2 1:3 G 7 °°O=E 0 n 0 C C.N '- °- C-p:� e� O0E uF 3 3 •-T R: > u C - ;?:-' Cl. H > ii R N c `a5� H y u u e N u E _ 2 c ob ° °'" cc N rC oW S' 8-0 c Tgo'-, o y R 300 a0 uo o c R N=�0 c o OL >25 0 E R� O: . - C 0Q uo 07 u omc u ov GOR. .° c s,e off_ u._ 3 -0 3 0 osJC E u u u o'L uN o g =Q N'0 ' C N_•' '0 GO.:._'� N v - N N b0"-' ,N ` _" N GO y ' 060 ,N C . Ira " N ' N U _° v uR N N'OC -0 Gx t t �' NbC O '54 L C RCN. uUH0._ , o C E._y N t.OLL � NY >, R G°aO Oy... N ° 0 p,-: GO-.'C•= ,,, O > Lt ,_.y R c 3 e N c �: E_ °'E o o u c E. E E -o! c R c p w - �F o � a) 0 o , �. - y c5.E'u N.. _ :9'ON° T °: 3.,bR >,ac0. °'y :c"c "o-6oY 12 0.3yj.-y..'O3 Nc :: . 0.c N ,N-- C R ` 3 0•V aL o'--'.- C .-. E•� 7, N SC E.N. C E 'O- O = R.= '3 H-r. O N E GO.n -.E. t>d-c R . y R u c offs g >c c �o c • oN=_ ° ^d c R °N u E °� E c c a>) 3 TN O .�a r'�c-, 3 ,,,.� L Gcns-2 :.E a .E- c R- _o O Te N t R F,a) .4 ° ct ° 0 0m G=`ou g.c-F, u R 03 N c.E -N c 0 `S R � u -. 3 E o R N � p.N >,.:r u•av y� � _ N N c� u N av R� � C y E_ o p E '0' R T.OL� 3x c 'u E c E'D� ,.N. y R O R N V t` N O L E 7s O, _ E = O. C .6.. ..s . rn•.s R t R _. - .T..J N E.-- N n• yQs3 > ouE- u == .v. OD 245 ,) 0 yr R GA_x a E vNc_ ` EYpO '- 00" R M L U- E� " E T G I L O �, y) n'y� N'O v O C p c`� Cp � °�'D t � E ° 3 N E,G Op LR� v -� O u t � T O C N N V),0'O R R.� R N•L''aL U.� N O c .Rn GA•' -U " H E •N.'L' u u N N C ''' o Y, C C- E R N. U �L x C N O 2- Lj.0•E N N N•N E E . T C .•. d N T R ,_, >R'- Y ° C tC >,. G C R N 0 C V R 40 D)'_C> R 0 u 0 E = E ° : 'O N C'- N •^0 G. a-. U p rC L C-C p.. y a R E GCO'0 u y= E E GO N C R N O GO p 0 N R N N A E O -O E -C -C L ,,, ,,.0-0 u N R'--' R-0 R y c u E N L u O._._O R R _ N C G > 3 L'T- = 3 E c R --s' - w u v o >, v v- 3'- .. _ -o$ = 3;_ �3 G C N n.TRt ,: N Q.F- T'D L o= N n•a�.iC. -O T`O, C.-,u - c C ° p ,. c p _ C `d vvi R'O ,_-c U O^ 3 GO >L o. r._o N.,' L o- E G- 0Q .._.- cL n =L = o- cow c c R NtO N C R R =- E N N R 8 O 0,. . ...0 �._ y O- 3 cd = N G O o'- TR C. L .., ,Nip o as R 3 >o 0 c._ u u Nsv) F a- us x c E uLl 3 u._ 3 y c'� E p O .'V 'C �.Y `.3 > N cV U.O m b p 0.0 N is A 8' • CO y O L ,E T O'O� •?) ` O• p._ ,E• , v'E.5.,.- C C > ,;- v E RL is N -Y R;O ap oC° ° °gW3b'• -o a>i `cha= uuo moZ3 >,,00 bEo,3 0=m���v0 ..) EEomgcC c` 3 `" p .. cL . . .C--• "L-- W =•'� R u:tiE Ly2.72, g .,°�' E v y ▪�p a H R R � - n. G -O'-- N ....d F ..C 9 C u 4=,c�-'c •1 >._,4.. 3 > 0~p N L.. C H L N y V U R O a.f 0°-0 .:9 n1O N - c d.) R9` 7, ° ^:o o ' a79 u n 2 u o R c3 '-' a E 0 _ 0 v 'o u 3•$ --� c u o 00 o'_ R O ,,-.0...,-.- iW A u G°;? H o y . >:,-�Nbx�= c ' R.=u., °' u 0pC Z.E. R•E CNT` Cro r: s0R5.oo c `'o ,N. `u,,_°'' oo._. v. ° - GvnE - s2c° >=° °C 1) = N N N °'O >,8 N U'y U^^N• 3 'O L c4 L= R N E u C p O>.o N N °'` = cd 0 mcEU R O'- G 0333oo C - 33 u s.- u :'.�-_ �.c N 0 E N u�= R >s u c'-'e o 0 0 3 T u o_ ` T u N-7 y ,N ,,,..- GO C .., ..„ „,,,,,,...,..c xtJ v,.Q_L�.V_ 'O: y g N t y •� T W 3 E R C T N O N C c. 0._0 ,„ R Y 0 E c .c s:d•v .LN+ A_E R C p„�> ,N„ c>-a) H;. .5p p 0 >L3 EEC O.L= '8 3 N 00" 0'O-R ,NN, d. -1, y 0-0 u 4.' L v) R R L W O N -n. vR,0: •NO 3 a....'" O.0 3 o a, - c u cL o R L. ,u,• ut o u r aC y .c cs oo R y G°o u 0tippmvF.n -C7hFu:_��u•++Efsr• t) co0E_t cu " E-2 u ,, c=R-ttitAEo 3 ;50: E N u 0�z y cd.Q C E r4 L U k R: 12 y TC' O C 7 ., 'C 'O--. C C 00- > N .. 3°,, E E E °U E- ...ice N - r R L N O T.-., O ° R 7 N N H ywFt O N N- E anv- R on 3`.C-._ T 3 is E c Ex °'���-. R 3 o°`n.E E N o n K N-= O v� _ N C ONcO E OCE R ' :. ^.:m >'O N a Nc O A C .E 1 E - u 3 EateER ° Ocro - = ° Ts_ yYo00 " n a „,-..0-c u °� e. � 0 .emssREo = R oEc • ° _ L aU^ + N o • . ,, cy R CoOL >' o .-� L ■ ■ o VJ au Lx ,. 08 2c{ 0C C-G 0 c05 .0 tQ:-^ >. m u c Oc°> ELCE °F ° _ joER y 0. • xU ▪ L oca - .C. 0 �'C7Q`O 0 u ( = 3 E� ° r =_ N W a LNC irn . = amcyNu'_ up-N a•E' >-ro V, ,9.00a - ,„ ,, CyCTC 0 CDO45GW O 2 c GE � t E C0 UO 72 -52 tn 3L mO : O 8 09LCO °x ?� R 04. 3"" Rc -5 " o a10 L• x = u o o� R o T(I) B 3 0.c ° . � N EC R.0 �d U ` c u' u Ro7 E cr � ? c.> -uZ °'E;vRgC,;�cC'EQo-L`oc�pUf E nv _ cu Nui'-o vH.° u- v�. -:a.! A > r� g vYu o n % u °C.) - : N.n u of *of lee r \ S S King County Executive TIM HILL King County Courthouse CITY OF RENTON 516 Third Avenue,Room 400 Seattle,Washington 98104-3271 rr (206)296-4040 AUG t� 2 1993 FAX(206)296-0194 RECEIVED CITY CLERK'S OFFICE July 27, 1993 The Honorable Earl Clymer Mayor, City of Renton 200 Mill Avenue South Renton, Washington 98055 RE: Whitegate Project Dear Mayor Clymer: Thank you for your June 16, 1993 letter regarding the Whitegate project and the Technical Review Area which includes the project site. I would like to clarify the land use designation of this area. On June 16, 1993 the Growth Management Planning Council (GMPC) recommended an urban designation for this Technical Review Area. This proposal will be analyzed in the Supplemental Environmental Impact Statement for the County- wide Planning Policies, due for publication this fall . The GMPC was favor- able to the concept of urban separators, but determined that the designa- tion of specific properties as urban separators is a local issue to be addressed between King County and the city. Staff has recommended that the City of Renton and King County consider an urban separator designation through a joint planning process. A joint planning agreement will specify the appropriate densities and zoning, development standards, impact mitigation and future annexation within the City's potential annexation area. Potential annexation areas are expected to be finalized by mid-1994, and an interlocal agreement addressing the issues outlined above is expected to be completed by mid- 1995. The City and the County will discuss the appropriate density and utilities, including the need for sewer systems, during the joint planning process. Certain proposals, such as the Whitegate proposal you mentioned, have already filed subdivision applications under current zoning. These proposals will be given due process under State law. The Honorable Early Clymer July 27, 1993 Page 2 Thank you, again, for your letter on this issue. If you have any ques- tions, please call Lois Schwennesen, Director of Parks, Planning and Resources, at 296-7503. Sincerely, Tim Hill King County Executive br3/E684 cc: Renton City Council Audrey Gruger, Chair, King County Council Cynthia Sullivan, Chair, Growth Management Planning Council Lois Schwennesen, Director, Parks, Planning and Resources Department rhAL-t-4,-/Liv • Nage 'trite July 12. 1993 Renton City Council Minutes Pane 318 Public Works: Code Referred 6/7/93 - Council request for investigation of a complaint regarding Enforcement garbage and illegally parked tow trucks in the 600 block of Dayton Avenue NE. Memorandum from Lynn Guttmann, Planning/Building/Public Works Administrator, stated that the garbage overflow occurs only on collection day, and that the tow trucks are owned by the resident and conform with City Code provisions. The owner was advised by the Code Compliance Officer that the trucks must not block sidewalks or extend into the right-of-way. King County: Urban Referred 6/14/93 - Council request that a letter be sent to Tim Hill, King Growth Boundary County Executive, reiterating the City's position regarding high density development and connection to the City sewer system. • Letter submitted to Tim Hill, King County Executive, by Mayor Clymer reiterated the City's position that the Whitegate project, located along May Valley Road and Coal Creek Parkway, be designated urban separator (low density, single family). Mayor Clymer also stated that any development greater than one dwelling unit per ten acres will be required to connect to the City's sewer system. Planning: Horizontal Referred 6/21/93 - Council request for clarification and purpose of the Mapping Network horizontal control network. Memorandum from Administrator Guttmann clarified that a survey network is essential to community development. She stated that the City's horizontal control network currently consists of approximately 1,000 monuments located throughout the City, and that the new system will provide more accurate coordinates. Building: Sign Code Referred 6/21/93 - Council request for review of signage violations Enforcement advertising a swap shop located on Airport Way, Rainier Avenue, and Logan Avenue. Memorandum from Administrator Guttmann stated that the Renton Swap and Shop and Easy Livin Sales, Inc., 93 S. Tobin, has been advised by the Code Compliance Officer to discontinue the use of banners and illegal signage for advertisement of their businesses. Executive Session MOVED BY SCHLITZER, SECONDED BY TANNER, COUNCIL CONVENE INTO EXECUTIVE SESSION TO DISCUSS PROPERTY ACQUISITION AND LITIGATION (Time 8:25 p.m.). ADJOURNMENT Council reconvened into regular session at 9:46 p.m.; roll was called; all members were present. MOVED BY KEOLKER-WHEELER, SECONDED BY TANNER, COUNCIL ADJOURN. CARRIED. Time 9:46 p.m. d?,--) - MARILYN J. RSEN, CMC, City Clerk Recorder: Cindy Anderson 7/12/93 • Noe CITYOF RENTON _+1- - <w, Mayor Earl Clymer ! / June 16, 1993 The Honorable Tim Hill King County Executive 400 King County Courthouse Seattle, Wa 98104 RE: WHITEGATE PROJECT Dear Mr. Hill: The City Council has requested that I communicate with you regarding the City's policy on this proposed project. We have been consistent in our discussions and decisions regarding the development of this project and the designation of the urban growth boundary. On April 5, 1993, the City Council passed Resolution 2960, which identified the urban growth boundary jointly delineated by the City of Renton and King County. The urban growth boundary included the Whitegate area and designated it as an "urban separator" (Low Density Single Family). We would like to re-emphasize the City's position that any development approved for this area which has a density greater than one (I) dwelling unit per ten (10) acres be required to connect to a sewer system. Developments at these densities should not be allowed to develop utilizing septic systems. 'ncerely, Ea Clyme Mayor Attachment c: Renton City Council Audrey Gruger, Chair, King County Council Cynthia Sullivan, Chair, GMPC • -)nn r,I;n AxrArmp cZ ,,th _ P p ntnn Wachinatnn 9R(1SS - (2061235-2580 CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON RESOLUTION NO . 29n A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON, ADOPTING A RECOMMENDATION FOR URBAN GROWTH TECHNICAL REVIEW AREAS ADJACENT TO THE CITY OF RENTON DESIGNATED IN THE COUNTYWIDE PLANNING POLICIES . WHEREAS, the Countywide Planning Policies establish a county- wide framework for the development of City and County Comprehensive Plans as required by the Growth Management Act, RCW 36 . 70A; and WHEREAS, the King County Council enacted Ordinance No . 10350 adopting and ratifying the Countywide Planning Policies and setting up a process for completion of additional work to refine and amend the Countywide Planning Policies including adjustments to the Urban Growth Areas; and WHEREAS, the City and County have worked cooperatively together to analyze growth issues in the Technical Review Areas , and have conducted a public meeting for citizens in the area; NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON, DO RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS : SECTION I . The above recitals are found to be true and correct in all respects . SECTION II . The City Council intends to adopt the Urban Growth Area boundaries, indicated on the attached Exhibit A, as part of the Interim Land Use Element of the City ' s Comprehensive Plan . SECTION III . The City Council finds' that the facts presented in Exhibit A are consistent with and support the designated Urban Growth Areas for the City of Renton . 1 • ESOLUTION NO. 2960 Nesoo PASSED BY THE CITY COUNCIL this 5th day of April , 1993 . 7 (/)-) Maril '. etersen, City Clerk y .✓ APPROVED BY THE MAYOR this 5th day of April , 1993 . \ � Earl Clymeir Mayor Approve s to rm: Lawrence J. War , City Attorney RES . 271 : 3/18/93 : as . 2 RESOLUTION NO. EXHIBIT A CITY OF RENTON URBAN GROWTH AREA RECOMMENDATIONS FOR TECHNICAL REVIEW AREAS I. Technical Review Area NC-3 (Newcastle) Description: This area is within a partially urbanized portion of the May Creek Drainage Basin and contains a large undeveloped tract known as "Whitegate" which is proposed for development as a residential subdivision at densities of one dwelling unit per acre. An • Environmental Impact Statement is being prepared for the proposed project. The area is not presently served by sewers, but sewer and water service are accessible. The area is heavily forested, providing wildlife habitat linkages with the King County Park, and urban development will increase sedimentation and erosion in the drainage basin. Recommendation: The City of Renton recommends that this area be designated as Urban, and included within the City's Urban Growth Area. It should be classified within the City's Comprehensive Plan as an urban separator, "Low Density Single Family Residential (LDSF). This classification allows two zoning categories. Low Density Single Family (SFL) at one dwelling unit per acre, and Resource Conservation at 1 dwelling unit per 10 acres. The recommended future zoning classification is Resource Conservation. H. Technical Review Area R-2 (May Creek) Description: The May Creek valley is a sensitive environmental area containing critical and resource areas identified in the Critical/Resource Area inventories completed by the City of Renton and King County. The area is surrounded by urban development but remains at low densities with large undeveloped tracts. Erosion and sedimentation are occurring in the May Creek s"ystem which is under review in a basin-wide study. Recommendation: The City of Renton recommends that this area be designated as Urban and included within the City's Urban Area Growth Area. It should be classified within the City's Comprehensive Plan as an Exhibit A %ow Noe Page 2 urban separator, "Low Density Single Family Residential" (LDSF). This classification allows two zoning categories: Low Density Single Family (SF) and Resource Conservation (RC). The recommended future zoning is Resource Conservation. IlI. Technical Review Area R-3 (East Renton) Description: This area begins at 148th Ave. SE. and extends to 156th Ave. SE. The area is semi-rural, with some smaller lots and subdivisions, but there are many large tracts of vacant land. Opportunities remain for small scale agricultural uses and maintenance of resource lands. The area is not served by sewers, but has fire and water services. It is also located within the May Creek Drainage Basin which would be severely impacted by new urban development within the area. Expansion of services to urban levels would not be feasible within the 20 year planning horizon. Recommendation: The City of Renton recommends that this Technical Review Area be designated as Rural, and remain outside the City's Urban Growth Area, although it would remain within the City's Sphere of Influence. IV. Techical Review Area R-1 (Briarwood) Description: The Briarwood neighborhood is a suburban residential district which has been developed with inadequate urban services. Much of the area has been subdivided into urban size parcels of 15,000 square feet or less. The area has been developed with septic systems only, of which many are in poor condition, and sewer services are not presently available. It is within the Cedar River drainage system, and is located over the Cedar River aquifer, which is the City's sole source municipal water supply. The area presents a high risk for contamination of the aquifer, and sewer needs to be extended. Recommendation: The City of Renton recommends that the Briarwood district be included within the Urban area as defined on the map. This area generally included properties that have already been subdivided at urban densities. The area should be designated on the City's Comprehensive Plan as Single Family (SF), but with a ten-year phasing overlay similar to the Soos Creek Plan that prohibits subdivision or development until sewers and other urban services are available. ' ' - -- C CITv OF RENTON r-r ��  t ` 0 r I . • w��.:,ilislitiu L's-=tee Resolution No . wn . -.....w.. i !i .iIJiiII��7 . . . . URBAN GROWTH AREA �� _IIPMSAMPOWAIIMM ....U.Vium- ' ir+- --,,-ai,..,f_ mi, lii ....... ..... ), " ....it.: E II >/v); C')'<•/;; innemwanumwm.=—.=E--.:7-t= w ___ owein il •>4 „„ ,„. ,,,,‹ •:. u_ II11EE? -- Q -er asiii ;`. .minim_ i__,„ mfarprzlirrii a .e -), • .-ii . "los (/) MN . 2:1 - _1 ;-:.,.1,2 =al-11=1. . rah- D - 4017_, :=Egasii ti - ems Eminmi-v- 4.„ cc ,bviiima tar.• i MEW AMA 2iai� earl-a r. cc --- .-- -- ilz-gen-moya..pis CC Inftwortst—Nitu ! II _..- C �_ ,-- . - " 2- - --:...""rift 1111111111111 -..... 1.11111111Wit „.•6....aillimmeo...• .1 Evise... .."--- P. . .. - ii. ._ 1...ir _. . L..1.....___ a. ..u.ir .WittWagli 'dr.-.4‘="ii it*,ifia- ds riptivreim---1 7.741,0 /art _w_i, Afriel . sib _M.-....'1 .41t1011111011191117MINEFAIII1111411011,1 / ir i Wow, � y i 'l I ' �sta� :./! d cn [ Itltll■- : -- =Mho ElpPtii •17, lin 4.0, ; ,, al -• AMBir 1 1 '--a no AMBE _ I I AneEE ' imr.,.. .cring "- CC a -- "A_-_-_:ii-__ mi' 7 II 2 N Q - -2 o D --ccI a) I �—C O r--CT) I a> _ -. /-) } C '� NQZ CT-cc obi .E CD '— _ p N ..;: -: C ; cL) �- F-- -CC L_ ? — I -- - > '-c o E o _ __J coZ. .� a.) c a> c Ec. E . e c 0 c7 C� F— Q U — Q U (-) v, s o ems_ c a � rr�� �y-� c.� c o id r L� CD Q C O.- V I D Q- V I ` c o E[ U • June 14, 1993 Renton City Council Minutes Page 276 rezone must show significant change of circumstances and that the zoning designation showed no change by the applicants. MOVED BY MATHEWS, SECONDED BY EDWARDS, REFER THIS CORRESPONDENCE TO THE PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT COMMITTEE. CARRIED. Citizen Comment: Correspondence was read from Franklin G. Carson, 1737 Lake Avenue S., Carson - Salary Renton 98055, expressing opposition to salary increases for elected Increases officials when the City is having financial difficulty. Citizen Comment: Correspondence was read from Liz Schmidt, 10927 SE 182nd, Renton, Schmidt - Coulon opposing McDonald's as food concessionaire at Gene Coulon Beach Park. Park Concession Citizen Comment Correspondence was read from the Walters and Schmidt families, 10927 Walters/Schmidt - SE 182nd, Renton, opposing McDonald's as food concessionaire at Gene Coulon Park Coulon Beach Park. MOVED BY EDWARDS, SECONDED BY Concession KEOLKER-WHEELER, REFER CORRESPONDENCE REGARDING THE COULON PARK FOOD CONCESSION TO THE COMMUNITY SERVICES COMMITTEE. CARRIED. OLD BUSINESS Council President Edwards presented a Committee of the Whole report Committee of the recommending that the City Council accept the Bellevue City Council's Whole offer to create a joint Bellevue, King County, Renton Council Committee Annexation: Sphere of to study the appropriateness of the "sphere of influence line" between Influence Boundary Bellevue and Renton. The Renton City Council further directed this Disputes, Bellevue Committee to develop a recommendation on where the line should be L� { �t L_ % located. Until the study is complete, only those annexation petitions or requests from within the study area that are currently before the �� << Boundary Review Board will be accepted by either City. The Renton City Council further directed the Administration to work with Bellevue staff in preparing appropriate background materials for the joint Committee as soon as possible. MOVED BY EDWARDS, SECONDED BY TANNER, COUNCIL CONCUR IN THE COMMITTEE REPORT. CARRIED. Utilities Committee Referred 6/7/93 - Utilities Committee Chairman Schlitzer presented a Utility: Renton Technical report recommending concurrence in the staff recommendation that College, Sewer Council revise the exemption to the moratorium granted to Renton Moratorium Mitigation Technical College (RTC) replacing all prior requirements (Council approved 12/3/90) with the following: 1) RTC will provide an up-front cost participation in the East Renton Interceptor of $82,501.50, the extent to which they benefit by the improvements. Said cost participation will be in the form of a deposit of $82,501.50 to the City of Renton, placed in an interest- bearing account. When the East Renton Interceptor project is complete, the actual assessment will be calculated. The City will utilize any or all of the $82,501.50, plus interest to satisfy RTC's assessment. After the assessment is satisfied, any balance remaining, including interest, will be returned to RTC. 2) RTC will provide to the City's wastewater utility the final plans and specifications for the improvements required by the original exemption. By providing the plans to the City, RTC acknowledges that Renton will utilize the plans to install the sewer improvements. ..� AJ ©V COMMITTEE OF THE WHOLE COMMITTEE REPORT June 14, 1993 BELLEVUE/RENTON "SPHERE OF INFLUENCE" BOUNDARY LINE The Committee of the Whole recommends that the Renton City Council accept the Bellevue City Council's offer to create a joint Bellevue, King County, Renton Council Committee to study the appropriateness of the "sphere of influence line" between Bellevue and Renton. The Renton City Council further directs this committee to develop a recommendation on where the line should be located. Until this study is complete, only those annexation petitions or requests from within the study area that are currently before the Boundary Review Board will be accepted by either city. The Renton City Council further directs the administration to work with Bellevue staff in preparing appropriate background materials for the joint committee as soon as possible. Bob Edwards, Council President (?_:(// (/ t CITY OF RENTON MEMORANDUM DATE: June 14, 1993 TO: Bob Edwards, Chairman Committee of the Whole VIA: Mayor Clymer 1 , FROM: Kay Shoudy, Planning Director SUBJECT: Urban Growth Boundary - Technical Review Area R-3 Rationale for maintaining the Urban Growth Boundary at 148th Ave. S.E.: 1. The adopted Land Use Element concept establishes a "community separator" between the higher density urban areas west of the existing city limits (approximately 142nd Ave. S. E. to 148th Ave. S.E.), and the semi-rural areas to the east. The purpose of the community separator was to provide a transition in uses from urban to rural without creating a hard dividing line and to maintain a corridor` of wildlife habitat beween the valleys. The Morrison property is located on the "rural" side of the community separator. Although the land use is mixed in this area, it is more rural in character than urban, with many large undeveloped tracts such as the Morrison property remaining. 2. The Urban Growth Boundary was established at 148th S.E. by the City Council in Resolution 2960. One criteria for determining the boundary in the Resolution included keeping any large undeveloped rural properties outside the urban line. If this property is moved into the urban area, it will be difficult to justify maintaining as rural adjacent subdivided properties. 3. Most of the property also appears to be located in the May Creek watershed rather than the Maple Valley watershed. (See attachment) The property is also within an area of low susceptibility for aquifer contamination. Neither of these conditions appear to be adequate criteria for including the parcel in the urban boundary. 4. At three public meetings held in the community, the residents of the area were adamantly opposed to extension of the sewer interceptor east of Renton, because they believed it would bring further urban development, which would appear to be true since 13f15&D oN AIN 6-- CoC(Avey 1)474 6/ iiip._3 G4A19 C1oWrig N I ____ 1- 1 ' S 0, �- � '7°T° M,� cgc:E I ,., f3 �vo y *-'�u 1— I i 1 _31 6 / A) , 1 r Millii J iJ _N.. si ..... ..... , ,......,.... ---,...-0 0'el?/ 6 to A)ME I'fe_d p&:-Rry , iikaii111.111.....Am ___ . ,. //: ___ ....... 1 / iiii +_ .. iin /� pry v _ ..�i�l. t11 1 - • BASIN VV4 11Stit �� � � 1 � � II C . �w■■' _,.... . t "err' �✓ CITY OF RENTON MEMORANDUM DATE: June 10, 1993 TO: Bob Edwards, Council President, Renton City Council members FROM: --) Jay Covington, Executive Assistant to the Mayor SUBJECT: Bellevue/Renton Sphere of Influence Line Attached is a copy of a FAX I received from Rob Odle of the Bellevue Planning Department indicating the Bellevue Council passed a motion 6/0 to delay any further annexation requests until the City of Renton and the City of Bellevue can agree upon a sphere of influence boundary line to be used for future annexations. Their proposal is to create a committee consisting of two elected officials from the Bellevue City Council, the Renton City Council and the King County Council. This committee would come up with a recommended sphere of influence line in accordance with county-wide planning policy LU-19. This item is scheduled for discussion at the Committee of the Whole meeting June 14th. cc: Mayor Earl Clymer AB " F� City of U . Bellevue ��; - _ MEMORANDUM ESN!NG�� Date: June 1, 1993 To: Mayor Bozeman and Councilmembers From: Bruce Freeland, Planning Director Rob Odle., Planning Department Subject: Bellevue Renton Sphere of Influence Line At your April 26 regular session you were presented with letters from residents located south of the current Bellevue-Renton "Sphere of Influence" line, At that time you directed staff to begin a dialogue with Renton staff regarding resolution of this issue. Staff has reviewed the situation in this area with Renton staff, and we agree that a primary goal is to insure that j eliable urban services are always available to this area. Policy LU-19 of the adopted Countywide Planning Policies provides a basis and process for resolving this issue. This policy states: LU.19 In collaboration with adjacent counties and cities and King County, and in consultation with residential groups in affected areas, each city shall designate a potential annexation area. Each potential annexation area shall be specific t.o each city. Potential annexation areas shall not overlap. Within the potential annexation area the city shall adopt criteria for annexation, including conformance with Countywide Planning Policies, and a schedule for providing urban services and facilities within the potential annexation area. This process shall ensure that unincorporated urban islands of King County are not created between cities and strive to eliminate existing islands between cities. both cities' staffs believe that this would be the appropriate process to follow in this area and that Bellevue and Renton staffs should proceed immediately to detail such a process. So that there is no confusion during this process, Bellevue staff recommends that the City not entertain any further annexations in this area until the process is complete. However, those annexations that have been filed with the Boundary Review Board should be completed. We believe this to be consistent with the previous concerns raised by Renton that a process be created to resolve the long-term urban service needs in the area south of the current "Sphere of Influence" line, Staff recommends, consistent with the above policy, that a joint Council committee be formed to oversee this review of the "Sphere of Influence" and to receive community input. We would suggest that two Councilmembers from each of the jurisdictions (Bellevue, King County and Renton) serve on this committee, This action also is consistent with the request of the residents to have the "Sphere of Influence" line reviewed and to allow for public input in that review. • If this general direction is consistent with Council's direction, staff will begin immediately to develop a joint work program and when complete forward it to each of the respective Councils. At that time it would be appropriate for each Council to .name their representatives. Therefore, if you concur with this directi4n_W _ram ,s_f l-y-Qu-u l'�s Item to the new business portion of tonight__s_agena in order to discuss and approve or modify the following_ filotion: De I .11 • e city Cc until supports the creation of a�joint Bell .in County and Renton Council Coinrnilfee to study the app opr"iateness of the "Sphere of Influence fine" between Bellevue and Renton, Until this study is complete the City of Bellevue will not accept eny_new annexation petitions from residents or pr9perty owners within.this study.arear Staff is directed to prepare a detailed QvP yiew of this study to be reviewed by each Council and tci present this at the earliest time, Please contact either of us should you have any further questions regarding this proposal. App .caoy COMMITTEE OF THE WHOLE REPORT REVISED March 22, 1993 RENTON SPHERE OF INFLUENCE BOUNDARY DISPUTES The Committee of the Whole met on March 22, 1993, to discuss areas of dispute with other governmental agencies within its sphere of influence. The Committee makes the following recommendations: South Council direct staff to prepare a letter for the Mayor and Council President's signatures asking for their cooperation in holding any potential annexations until such time as the potential annexation area subcommmittee completes its study and drafts recommendations for a dispute resolution process. East Council adopt a resolution adopting a recommendation for Urban Growth Technical Review Areas adjacent to the City of Renton as agreed upon by County and City staff, and as presented to the Committee of the Whole. North Council authorize staff to write a letter to the Boundary Review Board of King County requesting the Board to invoke jurisdiction and schedule a public hearing on the proposed Bellevue/Pembrook Meadows area annexation, and help resolve the sphere of influence boundary dispute and delivery of fire service. CA Richard M. Stredicke, Council President Pro Tern cc : Lynn Guttmann Kay Shoudy Jay Covington CITY OF RENTON h.f r�; MEMORANDUM DATE: March 16, 1993 TO: Bob Edwards, City Council President Renton City Council Members FROM: __1OP\Jay Covington, Executive Assistant to the Mayor SUBJECT: Renton Sphere of Influence Boundary Disputes In the process of developing our revised comprehensive plan and as part of the growth management process, the City of Renton has reaffirmed its sphere of influence boundaries. In some cases these boundaries have come in conflict with those of other cities or King County. The following are the three major areas that are in dispute, and the Administration's suggested strategy for resolving these disputes. SOUTH: The City's proposed sphere of influence line generally follows the King County Phase I growth boundary around Lake Youngs to approximately SE 208th Street. (See attached map). The city of Kent has identified its sphere of influence boundaries as being north to approximately S. 192nd Street. Therefore, the area between S. 192nd and SE 208th is in dispute. Staff recommends that the City send a letter to Kent asking for their cooperation in holding any potential annexations until such time as the potential annexation area sub- committee of the Growth Management Planning Council completes its study and draft recommendations for a dispute resolution process. Our hope is that this sub-committee will in fact develop a process that the cities of Kent and Renton can use to resolve this area of dispute. Councilwoman Mathews suggested that City Council members may want to talk directly with Kent elected council members to let them know of our interest and commitment to providing service to this area. This strategy may be helpful in strengthening the perception of Renton's interest in the area. EAST As the attached map indicates, the area east of Renton north from the Cedar River Basin to May Creek is currently in dispute with King County. The County plans to designate most of the area from Renton's existing city limits east as rural. As Council recalls, you have indicated the lines outlined on the map that should be included within the urban area. Staff recommends that Council adopt a resolution indicating its conviction that much of this area is urban in character. The City sees it as a logical extension of its boundaries and a way to provide an urban separation as a transition to rural uses to the East. Further, that immediately upon designation, the County would work with the City to ensure that the City's comprehensive plan for the area would be followed. We are scheduling a meeting with the County Executive to present the resolution to him and gain a commitment from him and his staff to work with us in this area. NORTH Council will recall that the city of Renton and city of Bellevue adopted separate sphere of influence line in this area. (See attached map) There are apparently two annexations pending in the area of dispute--Pembroke Annexation and the Newport Hills Annexation. The City recently sent a letter to Bellevue strongly opposing the annexation in these areas into the city of Bellevue. Staff recommends that Council adopt a resolution indicating the City's intent to annex the area from the city's current northern boundary north to SE 64th Street and east to a line identified in the attached map. Further, staff recommends that the Council draft a letter to the Boundary Review Board asking them to invoke jurisdiction over the area in dispute. It is our understanding that residents in this area are very concerned about becoming part of the proposed incorporated city of Newport Hills. Rather than become a part of this city, they would prefer to annex. Until now Bellevue has been the only city in the area actively annexing. Staff believes that many residents of this area agreed to annex to Bellevue simply because they did not believe there was an option to annex to Renton. A resolution will provide the logical link for these people to annex to the City. Invoking jurisdiction is the only legal means by which the two cities can resolve this dispu te. ccanex iI ( 1 0 f wro_ .� 0 C�2 ' F1 z b m o ,I 0, W 0C o o " fl w -04 u0 X al (S-i ., P. o i� P, y ,.- C v P1 LL Q SC I() ,,(C'' -c_____71:-. 0----iM'" °O. liy.... . ....7.,,-.--_-_—...,,,,, , 1 (--1,, - 1 ,-4\ _ f -- ,,c.:1. , ---- __, ::,,,01.•1 4 I Al,,, .;'.'1).-'.. in,t1 _ � . % c II / 111 J 1 .i7c1 \(' 12)- -7 ,7 . — N% ..1 1 - c `z I„I,I,,,,, 1 „ 11111 ,. ,\ i NINXibi ,,01,14, egt ,- raNglintiNii grg •,Iiii:t7-rN:•••F.7,70 J A cc 4 � _a1 ■_—TTP wtrl e,L-r, \I„ 7`;') \\ i1/4 •it C.'. . ill;'7'r. 7 7. 1.'1." -'--- IN: N...:.:N. O. __,,TP + 11 1".45" 0 ___ _ t10. : :.(1.:. 1116;.1 1111.111..:.:.i:.:i..:...•:::::.:.:.:.:.i:.;::i:.:;7.::.:.1 1..:: .11 'II tv irlul ' . : I t �� �. two =NM �` •'• Any ' • VAL,'�'' • ' '••• /013 r . .Ar& i 6 ��ow '. ' _� ; 4 . —' .' — S •r..;.':': ry 111... 4: ... ••:•,,,,.,.- •!. ••,-: • ..: ::::::::::.•::::::: .• 0° I— I I 1(jnj d-6,g ( • 'sic::: • Lr slow. .,ilii:•.:i,:.]y.,:iii,i:.:ii,.. .g,:,iii!i::,!,,:,i,:),1,i4i,. (I ill."'L..% silkch.l.i....::......... ......... ........, .,„„mo},....„,movi, .. i iip% 471/ . - Acifitisiiiiitegr 41' • 1 ,.., Folk 1:•:::::::::::: ::::j.•: :•:•!•:11111111111111W c . A.Ilik' —Tl i •.;t1-7,7'-•' ''----i' ..411.111111,',A1 emir. pfr .......:.:::.:::::.::.::::::::,::.::::::. 1 (t., --1" ,:::040,01nOgra,Ike fOOF 4 �• l- ci, ::Jlsii: . if. `V , A. f di : ,;.,,? Y,;;;K�yp ...:....:<>:::i;f iI i `icets4 i;:sit:::::.. � e n`.f::: ( F Y � _:='`� !< �:his. .115I t � � — ----- u 42/47, CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON, ADOPTING A RECOMMENDATION FOR URBAN GROWTH TECHNICAL REVIEW AREAS ADJACENT TO THE CITY OF RENTON DESIGNATED IN THE COUNTYWIDE PLANNING POLICIES . WHEREAS, the Countywide Planning Policies establish a county-wide framework for the development of city and county Comprehensive Plans as required by the Growth Management Act, RCW 3 6 . 7 0A; and WHEREAS, the King County Council enacted Ordinance No . 10350 adopting and ratifying the Countywide Planning Policies and setting up a process for completion of additional work to refine and amend the Countywide Policies including adjustments to the Urban Growth Areas; and WHEREAS, the City and County have worked cooperatively together to analyze growth issues in the Technical Review Areas, and have conducted a public meeting for citizens in the area . NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON, DO RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS : SECTION I . The above recitals are found to be true and correct in all respects . SECTION II . The City Council intends to adopt the Urban Growth Area boundaries indicated on the attached Exhibit A, as part of the Interim Land Use Element of the City' s Comprehensive • Plan . SECTION III The City Council finds that the facts presented in Exhibit are consistent with and 'Vtipport the designated urban growth areas for the City of Renton . PASSED BY THE CITY COUNCIL this day of , Marilyn Petersen, City Clerk APPROVED BY THE MAYOR this day of , Earl Clymer, Mayor Approved as to form: Lawrence J . Warren, City Attorney N RESOLUTION NO. EXHIBIT A CITY OF RENTON URBAN GROWTH AREA RECONDATIONS FOR TECHNICAL REVIEW AREAS I. Technical Review Area NC-3 (Newcastle) Description: This area is within a partially urbanized portion of the May Creek Drainage Basin and contains a large undeveloped tract known as "Whitegate" which is proposed for development as a residential subdivision at densities of one dwelling unit per acre. An Environmental Impact Statement is being prepared for the proposed project. The area is not presently served by sewers, but sewer and water service are accessible. The area is heavily forested, providing wildlife habitat linkages with the King County Park, and urban development will increase sedimentation and erosion in the drainage basin. Recommendation: The City of Renton recommends that this area be designated as Urban, and included within the City's Urban Growth Area. It should be classified within the City's Comprehensive Plan as an urban separator, "Low Density Single Family Residential (LDSF). This classification allows two zoning categories: Low Density Single Family (SFL) at one dwelling unit per acre, and Resource Conservation at 1 dwelling unit pser 10 acres. The recommended future zoning classification is Resource Conservation. H. Technical Review Area R-2 (May Creek) Description: The May Creek valley is a sensitive environmental area containing critical and resource areas identified in the Critical/Resource Area inventories completed by the City of Renton and King County. The area is surrounded by urban development but remains at low densities with large undeveloped tracts. Erosion and sedimentation are occurring in the May Creek system which is under review in a basin-wide study. Recommendation: The City of Renton recommends that this area be designated as Urban and included within the City's Urban Area Growth Area. It should be classified within the City's Comprehensive Plan as an Exhibit A Page 2 ter+ .r urban separator, "Low Density Single Family Residential" (LDSF). This classification allows two zoning categories: Low Density Single Family (SF) and Resource Conservation (RC). The recommended future zoning is Resource Conservation. Technical Review Area R-3 (East Renton) Description: This area begins at 148th Ave. SE. and extends to 156th Ave. SE. The area is semi-rural, with some smaller lots and subdivisions, but there are many large tracts of vacant land. Opportunities remain for small scale agricultural uses and maintenance of resource lands. The area is not served by sewers, but has fire and water services. It is also located within the May Creek Drainage Basin which would be severely impacted by new urban development within the area. Expansion of services to urban levels would not be feasible within the 20 year planning horizon. Recommendation: The City of Renton recommends that this Technical Review Area be designated as Rural, and remain outside the City's Urban Growth Area, although it would remain within the City's Sphere of Influence. IV. Techical Review Area R-1 (Briarwood) Description: The Briarwood neighborhood is a suburban residential district which has been developed with inadequate urban services. Much of the area has been subdivided into urban size parcels of 15,000 square feet or less. The area has been developed with septic systems only, of which many are in poor condition, and sewer services are not presently available. It is within the Cedar River drainage system, { and is located over the Cedar River aquifer, which is the City's sole source municipal water supply.1 The area presents a high risk for contamination of the aquifer, and sewer needs to be extended. Recommendation: The Cityof Renton recommends that the Briarwood district be included within the Urban area as defined on the map. This area generally included properties that have already been subdivided at urban densities. The area should be designated on the City's Comprehensive Plan as Single Family (SF), but with a ten-year phasing overlay similar to the Soos Creek Plan that prohibits subdivision or development until sewers and other urban services are available. _ i -- _ , ,i, ,, _. 1 - 1 �I�, 11164.',.1 N7 Resc ation No . . . Eno ipAlpir4romwk..% t.. pi -, -- -- URBAN GROWTH AREA . areso..4iiire----,m=winistaavw _,„... MEW me ''s ",. : IarjllrvklrdmrmM,!em. . --- ••• iit ir. , „,, , . saymq..1 l&-.111.2k imaiaira= MI . < >; < ,, ,, , 01111=Miraillip==----= ------ a) ..- 004111 . ii'iiiijJ!:!' iI1Eii _, A, ''' A s, -,'. ____ ..iimac... 4& Iii [ !Ii ); ,.. : a ... ..-.71:4=0 ' -.7-7- am Y' I. 0 —IT A Q ;_- a-- -- - oar 11 '. '_ liter;..,. ...._,71.itual.ei is «, ja 0 ma cc un- , ,., aII m , ._ .., ' '..., : —1-7. a = - :: ArlHair _No := r."5 iiriMi mice-""�� Nffer......M\ /WMIIorme. r, ,-.� kpr ola 1� Illwig nod n�Irib � ._:i rya i anti U .�•{.-n v�` A ,., � I Rio: i�:,�r'���no ��.,um- MErC1111107 I' '=+ - • 44�I '��w�. d •1 i W'' tl i- v_ II 11l _. . - /ilia = sTs %-., .� N= '��%dal �• _ - r'., �_ try. Z Me : .1:':, w: �w.. � .d ..d;ir..:1 .. < 1 11 I ,-'1i�.T-��. :---Bil-01.=.,,,,..,, =7 - a-. .-- --- =Ass ... ,.. , , c,) iallftil --D 7 J J (D I N ��� - cr .E. w -•_•- -- - cc) p o -CC -n `_ o W - _ o Q f---- -p Z7 I E l l W 0 cn o as E } C p r-- C p 75 o f E 11 W ( ) ? �� o .E o n e • �, 11 = Q ) C] _ c ``L o '--o - _ cG m 1 r — } a -cCa g E E _ - R rr �7 / C) 1 Q C-� U __ Cruet V �- ` _ C U C o _ F— Q �� CD '� 00. ��I7 n- U • • LI .oic o o .. (y I--- -1 C_D O- c_D I-- z Cr U r-- %�• -T= CITY )F RENTON fall -!f 4t„ -- L > Mayor Earl Clymer June 16, 1993 The Honorable Tim Hill King County Executive 400 King County Courthouse Seattle, Wa 98104 RE: WHITEGATE PROJECT Dear Mr. Hill: The City Council has requested that I communicate with you regarding the City's policy on this proposed project. We have been consistent in our discussions and decisions regarding the development of this project and the designation of the urban growth boundary. On April 5, 1993, the City Council passed Resolution 2960, which identified the urban growth boundary jointly delineated by the City of Renton and King County. The urban growth boundary included the Whitegate area and designated it as an "urban separator" (Low Density Single Family). We would like to re-emphasize the City's position that any development approved for this area which has a density greater than one (1) dwelling unit per ten (10) acres be required to connect to a sewer system. Developments at these densities should not be allowed to develop utilizing septic systems. ncerely, Ea Clyme Mayor Attachment c: Renton City Council Audrey Gruger, Chair, King County Council Cynthia Sullivan, Chair, GMPC 200 Mill Avenue South - Renton, Washington 98055 - (206)235-2580 THIS PAPER CONTAINS 50%RECYCLED MATERIAL.10%POST CONSUMER 'oriw *re CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON RESOLUTION NO. 29gd A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON, ADOPTING A RECOMMENDATION FOR URBAN GROWTH TECHNICAL REVIEW AREAS ADJACENT TO THE CITY OF RENTON DESIGNATED IN THE COUNTYWIDE PLANNING POLICIES . WHEREAS, the Countywide Planning Policies establish a county- wide framework for the development of City and County Comprehensive Plans as required by the Growth Management Act, RCW 36 . 70A; and WHEREAS, the King County Council enacted Ordinance No . 10350 adopting and ratifying the Countywide Planning Policies and setting up a process for completion of additional work to refine and amend the Countywide Planning Policies including adjustments to the Urban Growth Areas; and WHEREAS, the City and County have worked cooperatively together to analyze growth issues in the Technical Review Areas , and have conducted a public meeting for citizens in the area; NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON, DO RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS : SECTION I . The above recitals are found to be true and correct in all respects . SECTION II . The City Council intends to adopt the Urban Growth Area boundaries , indicated on the attached Exhibit A, as part of the Interim Land Use Element of the City ' s Comprehensive Plan . SECTION III . The City Council finds' that the facts presented in Exhibit A are consistent with and support the designated Urban Growth Areas for the City of Renton . 1 'ZESOLUTION NO. 2960 r PASSED BY THE CITY COUNCIL this 5th day of April , 1993 . arily LT. etersen, City Clerk APPROVED BY THE MAYOR this 5th day of April , 1993 . Earl Clym Mayor Approve s to rm• Lawrence J. War , City Attorney RES . 271 : 3/18/93 : as . 2 4400, Noe RESOLUTION NO. EXHIBIT A CITY OF RENTON URBAN GROWTH AREA RECOMMENDATIONS FOR TECHNICAL REVTFW AREAS I. Technical Review Area NC-3 (Newcastle) Description: This area is within a partially urbanized portion of the May Creek Drainage Basin and contains a large undeveloped tract known as "Whitegate" which is proposed for development as a residential subdivision at densities of one dwelling unit per acre. An Environmental Impact Statement is being prepared for the proposed project. The area is not presently served by sewers, but sewer and water service are accessible. The area is heavily forested, providing wildlife habitat linkages with the King County Park, and urban development will increase sedimentation and erosion in the drainage basin. Recommendation: The City of Renton recommends that this area be designated as Urban, and included within the City's Urban Growth Area. It should be classified within the City's Comprehensive Plan as an urban separator, "Low Density Single Family Residential (LDSF). This classification allows two zoning categories: Low Density Single Family (SFL) at one dwelling unit per acre, and Resource Conservation at 1 dwelling unit per 10 acres. The recommended future zoning classification is Resource Conservation. H. Technical Review Area R-2 (May Creek) Description: The May Creek valley is a sensitive environmental area containing critical and resource areas identified in the Critical/Resource Area inventories completed by the City of Renton and King County. The area is surrounded by urban development but remains at low densities with large undeveloped tracts. Erosion and sedimentation are occurring in the May Creek s'stem which is under review in a basin-wide study. Recommendation: The City of Renton recommends that this area be designated as Urban and included within the City's Urban Area Growth Area. It should be classified within the City's Comprehensive Plan as an "Exhibit A ram,,: Page 2 urban separator, "Low Density Single Family Residential" (LDSF). This classification allows two zoning categories: Low Density Single Family (SF) and Resource Conservation (RC). The recommended future zoning is Resource Conservation. M. Technical Review Area R-3 (East Renton) Description: This area begins at 148th Ave. SE. and extends to 156th Ave. SE. The area is semi-rural, with some smaller lots and subdivisions, but there are many large tracts of vacant land. Opportunities remain for small scale agricultural uses and maintenance of resource lands. The area is not served by sewers, but has fire and water services. It is also located within the May Creek Drainage Basin which would be severely impacted by new urban development within the area. Expansion of services to urban levels would not be feasible within the 20 year planning horizon. Recommendation: The City of Renton recommends that this Technical Review Area be designated as Rural, and remain outside the City's Urban Growth Area, although it would remain within the City's Sphere of Influence. IV. Techical Review Area R-1 (Briarwood) Description: The Briarwood neighborhood is a suburban residential district which has been developed with inadequate urban services. Much of the area has been subdivided into urban size parcels of 15,000 square feet or less. The area has been developed with septic systems only, of which many are in poor condition, and sewer services are not presently available. It is within the Cedar River drainage system, and is located over the Cedar River aquifer, which is the City's sole source municipal water supply. The area presents a high risk for contamination of the aquifer, and sewer needs to be extended. Recommendation: The City of Renton recommends that the Briarwood district be included within the Urban area as defined on the map. This area generally included properties that have already been subdivided at urban densities. The area should be designated on the City's Comprehensive Plan as Single Family (SF), but with a ten-year phasing overlay similar to the Soos Creek Plan that prohibits subdivision or development until sewers and other urban services are available. as, = CITY OF RENTON 1--- . dil_i,\ 4,.., - --- r ��_ fp 11.0.1....roommi L: 4 Resolution No .��' `' I = .. ;,::��„� -- -- ' URBAN GROWTH AREA simEN • < <x,,>>)';c.,c<,..,) ..,,\.,,1/4,r e•„:);...:;:.....•.,,;„.7.•,.••.„•:,.• ,.--. jUa101i_N..dFAsSIpaI --_-__--_--_-4.-.k-__pIsil-5 iara• l'i•'.i4's9n'Ia1r 1:•fPei el%J Y v v ) Y j, .1. =a•--g4i pi1f1:.4ft7'.... , ,; < x : r _ — -� „AN .- _ ____- _ :—, u_ tea_ .. /. .. ,. n ... ... j - --. .. �mwsr., ,•1 ms - (/) -=IL--ice . ", ›/ "`/Yv • ( ,0 `, _ _ 'A ice: -_ r;_ ■ );•-, : C-.) IIIMIIIIIkamilillipmmffli- -- < -11042:4:m& 1.-- • YLL 'Ir4,,Iir =111== -- i-J-1,....., gpfiliasa I it, . __. ._ oe,. ..., i: • . of�, S� Q - 1 . w..A•w...I c i . ovi •'��.isii ils .•• Lear NW 011111 cc ....ri Ai imr...-- .„.„,...„.„- 1. apse Am*.3=:. 0 PI"co - 11 WAN= mildmirissnirgolimi11.'4 rall Ill' 21-"7—"Mi"11"---- 41111111. a w..,....-1....a- - ....idisollii....60. ihimi..---Ttimm .. .., M • 7 la..- - -..7-- al no wk. la or 110 111111MINIK vivo.. • ...., pi. .. ,, ie- .,-tric:._ ..... ....° " ..., ' ,II �!'_,„ , a. stir ....E . • . ... • ;,,„,,_ :._..�. . �:,, ,., : , VAPPITIVII*Brata -2., I Ming= i i NTS...ma/rare la V wow ----- I. mu WI iliVAillwffew- -.4 __L: - Q ME . • -.�.��r� — . °°cc - zo Arki I T .>nflm�E . Wee - - " --- - n,F.-- i_ 1 I . _._ - _ I I = -- 0 iD Q Q F— .� -a 174 o ..,-) t I t I U cr, a> I au E _ - , co 0.) .g ,=, ,_. ,,._. - 1 ; 1 , 1 0 o rN >- �—� Q L� I •- yC O - o.• =Ez. - I Z m 0) — > 'm - E E _ g Q J Q Z c a> - c au i _¢ a g E , -_ _ _ g z -1Z — a C.....) h — — o o b -g c -_ -i - - E Z Z QU c� v I d N . - oe , � — Fo — — T Z Q = ._= 0 "c � <, . -W C� mU- � E v E• U CI Z (CDQ ra_ n_ U I ` v,c _ J_.1 . l CC J co U cu - cr) � •-- x d c CD .- _ o_ .... .. n 0 'Y.. I-- - L) Q_ L7 I--Z CD F-- PLANNING DIVISION New irrev CITY OF RENTON LAW OFFICES CAIRNCROSS &HEMPELMANN JUN 1 1 1993 A PROFESSIONAL SERVICE CORPORATION RECEIVED 70m FLOOR,COLUMBIA CENTER,701 FIFTH AVENUE SEATTLE,WASHINGTON 98104-7016 (206)587-0700 TELEX:493-8803 FAX:(206)587-2308 CITY OF RENTON June 11, 1993 JUN 1 4 1993 RECEIV& Honorable Earl H. Clymer CITY CLERK'S OFFICE Mayor, City of Renton Renton City Hall, Sixth Floor 200 Mill Avenue South Renton, Washington 98055 Re: R-3 Renton Technical Study Area Dear Mayor Clymer: We are land use counsel for Jack and Mardell Morrison, who own a forty-acre parcel at the south end of the R-3 Renton Technical Study Area. We urge you to recommend retaining the urban growth area designation for the Morrison property and adjoining properties that are located within the East Maplewood Creek Subbasin. The Morrison property forms the northeast corner of the East Maplewood Creek Subbasin, as recently defined by the City of Renton's East Renton Sewer Interceptor EIS. (See Attachment A). The chief argument that has been made for redesignating the R-3 area from urban to rural, to protect May Creek from the impacts of urban development, does not apply to the south end of the R-3 area. A second key point is that on March 8, 1993 the Renton City Council chose to build the East Renton sewer interceptor in the NE 4th Street right-of-way. (This street is called SE 128th Street outside Renton.) The NE 4th/SE 128th Street corridor forms the south boundary of the R-3 area. The sewer interceptor will extend eastward within the right-of-way of this four-lane, urban arterial road until reaching the east boundary of the current City limits. Renton is oversizing the sewer interceptor in anticipation of further eastward extension along the NE 4th/SE 128th Street corridor to provide sewer service to the East Maplewood Creek Subbasin area, as identified in the sewer interceptor EIS. The Morrison property directly abuts the NE 4th/SE 128th Street sewer interceptor corridor. Given Renton's recent decision on the East Renton sewer interceptor, the argument that expanding services to urban levels would not be feasible for the R-3 area actually applies only A \rrr Honorable Earl H. Clymer June 11, 1993 Page 2 to the majority of the R-3 area that is located outside the East Maplewood Creek Subbasin. This larger R-3 area, due to hilly terrain and slopes generally falling to the north toward May Creek, cannot access the NE 4th/SE 128th Street sewer interceptor corridor by gravity flow. In contrast, the Morrison property and the several adjoining R-3 area properties that are within the East Maplewood Creek Subbasin can access the new sewer interceptor by gravity flow. The City of Renton is completing the final design and permitting for the NE 4th/SE 128th Street sewer interceptor and is scheduled to start construction this September. A relatively short connection to this new sewer line will ensure provision of the full range of urban services to the Morrison property, which is already serviced by an urban arterial road, a METRO transit route, a public water system, and nearby public schools. Accordingly, we respectfully request that Renton recommend retaining the urban designation of the Morrison property and other R-3 area properties located in the East Maplewood Creek Subbasin. (See Attachment B, map depicting R-3 area properties within East Maplewood Creek Subbasin.) Remaining R-3 area parcels located in the May Creek Basin could be designated rural, consistent with the concerns expressed regarding May Creek. One exception to the northward rural designation could be Apollo Elementary school, which is located immediately northwest of the Morrison property and already receives sewer service from the City of Renton. We now proceed to provide greater detail concerning our request. 1. Property within our proposal for a modified R-3 urban growth area is located in the East Maplewood Creek Subbasin as defined by Renton's sewer interceptor EIS. ► Renton set the EIS study area boundary according to drainage basins. The City's objective was to include properties that would allow for a gravity flow of sewage to the sewer interceptor. (David Christensen, Renton Public Works). ► The Morrison property forms the northwest corner of the East Maplewood Creek Subbasin. (DEIS Figure 3; See Attachment B). ► "The entire study area is outside the boundaries of the May Creek Basin." (FEIS p. 167; See Attachment C). ► Properties to the north and to the east of the Morrison property generally drain to the north and east into the May Creek Basin. ► The rationale for designating the R-3 area for rural use to protect May Creek from urban development does not apply to the Morrison property and other R-3 properties that are in the Maplewood Creek Basin. Now Honorable Earl H. Clymer June 11, 1993 Page 3 2. The Renton City Council decided on March 8, 1993 to extend sanitary sewer service to the East Renton area via the SE 128th Street corridor. ► The City Council selected a modified West Maplewood interceptor alternative, which will extend a new oversized sewer interceptor eastward along the NE 4th/SE 128th Street corridor to Renton's current east boundary. Renton anticipates starting construction of the sewer interceptor this fall. (See March 8 Council minutes and DEIS Figure 6, Attachments D and E.) ► The East Renton Sewer interceptor will be oversized, allowing for future eastward extension of sewer service to the large portion of the East Maplewood Creek Subbasin that lies east of Renton's current city limits. The Morrison property is located at the northeast corner of the East Maplewood Creek Subbasin. ► The future eastward extension of the East Renton sewer interceptor along the SE 128th Street corridor provides an opportunity for further extending sewer service to Liberty High School, which currently disposes its sewage each day by truck. 3. Existing and future development reliant upon septic tanks in the East Maplewood Basin imperils Renton's domestic water supply. ► Renton relies entirely on ground water for its water supply, and will increasingly rely upon the Maplewood Basin aquifer as its water source. (DEIS p. 42; see Attachment F). ► "It has become clear that existing and future septic systems within the study area are a threat to the City's water supply." (DEIS pp. 1 and 83; FEIS p. 67; see Attachments G and H). ► "The East Renton Interceptor would address the water quality threat from over 1,000 existing septic systems" (FEIS p. 163; see Attachment I), as well as assure that additional development does not add new septic systems polluting Renton's water supply. 4. Retaining the urban designation upon the R-3 area's south end allows Renton to meet its environmental objectives for the East Renton sewer interceptor. ► "The first objective was to ensure the interceptor would be able to facilitate the overall long range projected flows for the entire East Maplewood Subbasin," Now' Nape Honorable Earl H. Clymer June 11, 1993 Page 4 which includes the south end of the R-3 area. (Renton Public Works March 1, 1993 Council Memo, page two, emphasis added.) ► The second objective is "having the capability to provide sewer service to the entire basin, enabling the City to provide the added layer of aquifer protection to the basin." (Id.) ► Redesignating the south end of the R-3 area from urban to rural will bar sanitary sewers and prevent Renton from achieving its environmental objective to fully sewer the entire basin. 5. NE 4th/SE 128th Street, which the Morrison property directly adjoins, is a four lane, concrete urban arterial road. ► METRO Transit bus route No. 111 runs along SE 128th Street and provides service to Downtown Seattle. (DEIS pp. 92, 93; See Attachment J.) ► The Morrison property is already directly served by urban level roads and transit service. 6. Retaining the existing urban designation of the Morrison property (and other R-3 area properties located in the Maplewood Creek Basin) is consistent with Countywide Planning Policy LU-14, which establishes criteria for the designation of the Urban Growth Area: Policy LU-14. The lands within the Urban Growth Area (UGA) shall be characterized by urban development. The UGA shall accommodate at least the 20-year projection of population and employment growth with a full range of urban services. The Countywide Planning Policies shall establish the urban Growth Area based on the following criteria: a. Include all lands within existing cities, including cities in the rural area and their designated expansion areas; b. The GMPC recognizes that the Bear Creek Master Plan Developments (MPDs) are subject to an ongoing review process under the adopted Bear Creek Community Plan and recognizes these properties as urban under these Countywide Planning Policies. If the applications necessary to implement the MPDs are denied by King County or not pursued by the 'tire Honorable Earl H. Clymer June 11, 1993 Page 5 application(s), than the property subject to the MPD shall be designated rural pursuant to the Bear Creek Community Plan. Nothing in these Planning Policies shall limit the continued review and implementation through existing applications, capital improvements appropriations or other approvals of those two MPDs as new communities under the Growth Management Act. c. Not include rural land or unincorporated agricultural, or forestry lands designated through the Countywide Planning Policies plan process; Comment: There are no designated agricultural or forestry lands in the R-3 area. d. Include only areas already characterized by urban development which can be efficiently and cost effectively served by roads, water, sanitary sewer and storm drainage, schools and other urban services within the next 20 years. Comment: The smaller portion of the R-3 area that abuts NE 4th/SE 128th Street and is located the East Maplewood Creek Subbasin already has urban roads, transit, water and schools services. Other urban services, particularly urban sanitary sewer service, can efficiently and cost effectively be provided by the City of Renton within the next 20 years, as we previously discuss in this letter, with partial funding by developer contributions/impact fees. The existing land use pattern of adjacent land uses to the east and west along SE 128th Street is suburban in character. e. Do not extend beyond natural boundaries, such as watersheds, which impede provision of urban services. Comment: Our proposal to retain the urban designation of those R-3 area properties which are located within the East Maplewood Creek Subbasin properly respects the natural watershed boundary between Maplewood and May Creeks. f. Respect topographical features which form a natural edge such as rivers and ridge lines; and Comment: The Morrison property, although not at a sharp ridge line, does approximate the topographic northeast crest of the East Maplewood Creek NSW '410° Honorable Earl H. Clymer June 11, 1993 Page 6 Subbasin. Properties to the north and east generally slope down to the north and northeast to the May Creek Valley. g. Include only areas which are sufficiently free of environmental constraints to be able to support urban growth without major environmental impacts unless such areas are designated as an urban separator by interlocal agreement between jurisdictions. Comment: Additional urban development would not cause significant environmental degradation as both King County's and the City of Renton's development regulation and critical area ordinances will protect any environmentally sensitive areas that may be present. 7. Retaining the existing urban designation of the Morrison property (and other R-3 area properties located in the Maplewood Creek Basin) is also consistent with Countywide Planning Policy LU-8 which speaks directly to the question of whether use of septic systems is advisable for a particular area: Policy LU-8. Designated rural areas shall have low densities which can be sustained by minimal infrastructure improvements, such as septic systems and rural roads, without degrading the environment or creating the necessity for urban level of services. Comment: Existing septic systems are degrading the Maplewood Creek aquifer, adversely impacting the City of Renton's potable water supply, and violating State groundwater quality standards. Existing development in the East Maplewood Creek Subbasin cannot be sustained by septic systems without degrading the environment. As a result, the City of Renton is oversizing the SE 128th sewer interceptor to accommodate future eastward extension which will facilitate converting numerous existing residences from septic systems to sanitary sewer. Changing the designation of the Morrison property from urban to rural area will require adding septic tanks to a basin where Renton is currently focusing great effort to eliminate the environmental problems that septic systems pose, and would be inconsistent with Countywide Planning Policy LU-8. In summary, we believe that our proposal to retain the urban designation of the Morrison property and adjoining properties that are also located in the East Maplewood Creek Subbasin directly advances Renton's environmental objectives and answers the mandate of the Countywide Planning Policies. The reasons given for redesignating the R-3 area may fit the larger R-3 area to the north, but simply do not fit the facts of the R-3 area's south end. A rural designation of Honorable Earl H. Clymer June 11, 1993 Page 7 environmental problems that septic systems pose, and would be inconsistent with Countywide Planning Policy LU-8. In summary, we believe that our proposal to retain the urban designation of the Morrison property and adjoining properties that are also located in the East Maplewood Creek Subbasin directly advances Renton's environmental objectives and answers the mandate of the Countywide Planning Policies. The reasons given for redesignating the R-3 area may fit the larger R-3 area to the north, but simply do not fit the facts of the R-3 area's south end. A rural designation of the R-3 area located in the East Maplewood Creek Basin would be contrary to the paramount public interest in protecting Renton's water supply. We thank you for considering our request. Very truly yours, 9jAtt X4444..fiele4---...- John W. Hempelmann 3V1 Alan L. Wallace ALW:rhs Enclosure 206639.D12 cc: Renton City Council Lynn Guttmann Director, Department of Planning/Building/Public Works City of Renton Kay Shoudy Planning Manager City of Renton Craig Larsen Deputy Director King County Department of Parks & Planning 3 v Y V = g 7 1 E o 0 0 Y .r - 3 a o y- c ° = a a 3 . p . y C '� w > W e g C 4 u 1 C . '3 C u m 5 - 7• 0` u y .5 3 n O C N 4 v e 0 E o.0 ... E n o y y a `o e t E Ti. O s -5 a _e • - z E °° $aF ; ✓ w . » 3 Cs u a 4 - =�d .. o ° p5 � " � U w Su S SS Y • V s . S 2 a.a i- y 3 s u L 3 e 4 0-3 es 5 5 43. 7.72.21 >',I 2 =g� g �+ v y 32 .a o .. » o . 0 • y Q y . w p 0 3 9 = > s 2 a x _a . _.ag 2> e• a 47 . 2 Ti g vagte - e F e L $y u o - - u a ° e ° =''� �.. d u 2 0 4 a �. SeEy2: w CuY 444.4 ea ae;g g 2 •» G2emm .. � 3 'g ; . � a _ = , 1is2 a t= y(ile y5 L.� 2.24 . Z? . G a 8 M 2 g , : 9 . . g o s 2 y w O e sci "' C 4 a » eYY $ tL E $ w 3 • a U 4 a TI y v O Y ,.c 2.Q G. V Y u ° > Z O d' I cD T T T.. ( 11 t t O 400094 >. • 0.0Co 0.4•OM0• OC4e..3ttntlno44 4.C • 07C o o 4. 0 4 C.. Y 4 C 0.0 C n C 1 C: C C O V C: C 4. 1. •.. 4 4 q✓ U✓ 4 w a 0 • 0co • ••.. 4Y00 .144W44 0A.I'. ✓ C04.0041 ...4.0..40 4 ✓ 4 Y E..V A ✓ SC S Y U tl L• 0 S:Y... 0 0444. > 3 > ✓4.. >. C • 0.•.r 4 n 0.• C - 4 > 0-.."4 .: Y O a ✓✓ 4., 3-. 0 4 A 4 Y M • 440.43. OOGOX H.' n9,Y. 4 C.i C130.. CU 0 7 ✓ •✓.. .w •A4 >A C.. .. ... Y 4•U0..1 » 4C ✓.•. 40.. 4EU' 0.0n...0. 4✓ C'. ✓W Y 7 E • • 7 V > ✓✓ 4 ..^. 4 V W n• '. '� •<W N W c 4 0 • OC ✓ 4.•. 3 C 4 Y 4M .040 •AC • 400 04-2 • 0 n • CO 0 .4400 004 0.t1 1 p•+� p • •A p n G✓ >.W P. a C O F Y µ V W y ~ O e W.•N..0 9 O O 2 C • w ( 0x y4' n,•.•C 34•°4 VC �� ✓ J7 A = ,�lO. Na ✓� • ✓ C -+ >.4 OT•.O� ! 0.2 7 ✓ 4 4 V • 0 4 ✓ 4.2.44424..., 4 0 313.400 .a 4 4400 C °N{"' • 7 4 0 4 4 y p•n O n Y W A 3 4 C 0.A.C.U >,u.•C O �.a w '. p Y n Y .0'1 0 0.• o .CL.' 4 w N-.4.1Cv p 9 Y N 7•.+ 4 M ..C.0+� U W 7 E gh 1i..A 0.d el' �✓ E 4 0.ti 1.0 t.. ... •.0 • Y Y✓ Y.0 4 °M 3 ✓-- y 04.0m0 e 4 •O m n ✓ 0 4.. 4 4 > d ✓ 3 ✓ 4 C"" 4✓ roe C Y o ✓✓ C 4.0 .. •,C >.✓ C.. 3 7 C{4 ✓N C• • +� }•..Oi ° U V'O Y >`4 ° U w 0 ✓ 4 O 0.>~.. • 3W nC , 04nC4 A44 sa1Y -"'� °� C 04 U0 • 44 u2M CMA3 rm ), O✓ a ✓ .. 7 W 4 • 2 ✓ •✓ U �. < ^y M y,1 •0 p 4✓ 2 C , 4420.. .. 0 4J • .Q ° O,,,� 4 4 M .yA ° O✓ O.. CO 0.3 ✓ • , C f'.. • d p a ''•. 0� ° p 4 ° -•L-• -X • X.0.Cv .~OWW� Y 'e.Ui.-1- O.Oo •...N�+ � o✓.. Pn4nA ++ 0N�+✓ !tS 04 O aka U ✓ O - .�: > • C 0 n-. w U n ✓ ,.O ° V 4 i!i!i:1 ~ C N O3 • E ✓A "• ✓ 0 7 .. . '. • 4) 4✓.�i10'..C .ai.•� OM 4O e+4 44„" 0• ...... 0 =A 4 w > n "✓ A 4 4GCC >.> E UWn 4OM ✓ 4✓+. wniw.."....i3 'C'r'Na13 • 04✓.-1 u..✓ 4.0O4.yp a4N. C 4 oY.. ✓ ..C. 000 J'".Cn0...Me 4 a.,. 0 M 4 A C"'' .0 N U A C 4 ti 4.13. 3. • U ✓tl✓ '�.� w 4 .>✓'.. tl W 4 .. Cn °W.C: •.. 44 4p4 tly ... °. Y.C7 • Cw✓o 77 Cw'OG4C0 4 e 4 8 U 1 O✓ 4 Y_ 7 O Y a 4 C �'. 4 ✓ ✓F✓ 4 1. 4 X 0..✓ > a e v 4 Y O E~ o A e= 0 0. • Y >'.✓ 4 4 U > C 4.0 do Mc WM•p U .0 ✓.... Y •4 o v 4 • 7U✓ n..C. y4 ✓ 3 .. 0.• XOC '4M ✓ MA O •4 rC •0.4✓ .4+ • 44TIO 4 n 0 .' ✓ A M M ✓ ° 0 • a ht.. •P... 3 2 4 .. 63 O. 4� OUCC nCSC > O. GO n0.00 w ••p4✓ o .•i •'3...... O•'.✓ • J0� 0. p5C4Y40 .00 C04E v04n0S • 4✓ o • a Q�w"'C< w"+ 110 CAM C� 0 E C✓ 4 0..A w ✓ 0 4 n C C 0. 4.>.4 0 0 ✓ 4 , 2 14 y 4 4 4 14i1 YA O C 0 Y 4 > 0 0 u E.r M P. Y Y 0 ✓ .. 0.• 410 0 4 4 0✓ 4 0 .1 ✓ . 4•4 ✓ 0✓ e > 0 0 N %.w.•..•• C 0 ✓ 7^ w r. w✓17 0 m 7 4,0 O > 4•C ✓✓ • 4 U... C 0.4 C E .•. 4..'. 3 w 0 4✓ • 4 4 4 p O 4 >.. 0 4 4 A.1 • C. ..7 07.. 09 OC •• Y 30 74^WU > oC40'✓ ✓A t1Y 32 .�Nw id < 2 1. 14 >. .� 4 A 4 40 .4 ✓�-„ 3 bolo N F O 0. 0.-.~ ✓a+ n O 4 1 0.2..00000 W Y Y O.7. 0• 0 •M W • >' • • 0. = n0 > .. 4 44C..A0E 40C .. H ✓ 4 > 403ySMCt10 O arA as W ✓ 0 4 C • 7 0 4•C 4 M✓ ✓ 4 Y '. C .+"' .. O p ♦ C✓ N 1.. " = n 0. 0.0 ✓ 0•-. 4 ✓ E 0.4 f.. >. C✓ 4 will ,pa... 4 C 04 to ✓ 7 2 4 E C. •..A.•. C . • 4 4 n C p OA 0 CA ✓ 4 4 4w >. .... 4 O•. w A O 41. • 0044.0 OnCu ✓ >.4 ✓ OC44 1'. CoC >.�AYYAMM M Cj✓.. . •A.N•. CC ,... ,A04EC4Y44n U. U4 43 . OY40 ✓MW44M0 CC 4 43449W .'. •..+.4✓.. Y3'. O.AYC .. C4.. n • .. ✓ • C ° 3..w7CO.V W • II 47� > O 0. O n n n 0 > O ✓ ✓ 3 .. 7 0.> Y > • 0 .6.. .6... 24037 MC.... = N O.+ 4 0 H 7 • 4 A 4 0 4 7 O.0 2 .0 7 n >. 0 >. Y n GG C.... C 0 0 0 2 C O..0 ..0 U.... O 3. 00 P M-. 7 A F W F n..A 4 E t7 4. Y n 3' tl 1>•..5.. Y 4✓ F 4 O. 4 U • r 4 • O w 4 4 0 X F 3 C 4 M 3 ✓ lisre March 8. 1993 Renton City Council Minutes Page 122 OLD BUSINESS Referred 3/1/93 - Transportation Committee Vice-Chair Schlitzer Transportation presented a report recommending that Council authorize the Mayor and Committee city clerk to execute the agreement between the City and Burlington Transportation: Northern Railroad for right-of-way easements at the intersection of Burlington Northern Park/Lake Washington Boulevard and construction of two railroad Railroad Crossings crossings and the petition to the Washington Utilities and Transportation Agreement Committee for approval to construct these crossings. MOVED BY SCHLITZER, SECONDED BY STREDICKE, COUNCIL CONCUR IN THE COMMI i E REPORT. CARRIED. Transportation: WSDOT Referred 3/1/93 - Transportation Committee Vice-Chair Schlitzer, Interlocal Agreement, presented a report recommending that Council authorize the Mayor and Talbot Rd. S. Resurfacing the city clerk to execute the resolution, federal air project prospectus, and the Washington State Department of Transportation interlocal agreement for the Talbot Road South improvements project. The Committee further recommended that the resolution regarding this matter be presented for reading and adoption. MOVED BY SCHLITZER, SECONDED BY STREDICKE, COUNCIL CONCUR IN THE COMMITTEE REPORT. CARRIED. (See later resolution.) Transportation: WSDOT Referred 3/1/93 - Transportation Committee Vice-Chair Schlitzer Interlocal Agreement, presented a report recommending that Council authorize the Mayor and Airport Way/Rainier Ave. city clerk to execute the resolution, federal-aid project prospectus, and Resurfacing Washington State Department of Transportation interlocal agreement for the Airport Way and Rainier Avenue South, from Logan to South Second, resurfacing and preservation project. The Committee further recommended that the resolution regarding this matter be presented for reading and adoption. MOVED BY SCHLITZER, SECONDED BY STREDICKE, COUNCIL CONCUR IN THE COMMITTEE REPORT. CARRIED. (See later resolution.) Transportation: WSDOT Referred 3/1/93 - Transportation Committee Vice-Chair Schlitzer Interlocal Agreement, presented a report recommending that Council authorize the Mayor and • CTR Plan city clerk to execute the interlocal agreement with Washington State Department of Transportation to receive S20,000 federal grant money with a local match of S3,122 for administration of the Commute Trip Reduction Plan. The Committee further recommended that the resolution regarding this matter be presented for reading and adoption. MOVED BY SCHLITZER, SECONDED BY STREDICKE, COUNCIL CONCUR IN THE COMMI1 11.E REPORT. CARRIED. (See later resolution.) Utilities Committee Referred 12/7/92 - Utilities Committee Chair Schlitzer presented a report Utility. East Renton recommending concurrence with the Planning/Building/Public Works Interceptor Department recommendation to select the West Maplewood Alternative (as modified in the 3/1/93 memorandum to the Utilities Committee and Council) as the preferred sewer interceptor route. The Committee further recommended that Council direct staff to initiate the final design process for this alternative. MOVED BY SCHLITZER, SECONDED BY STREDICKE, COUNCIL CONCUR IN THE COMMITTEE REPORT. CARRIED. Councilwoman Keolker-Wheeler stated that if either of the two absent councilmembers wish to discuss this issue next week, she would be willing to make a motion to reconsider the matter. , . .. . --....-. ,, . AV N I .• • -; , .--,, .. --•,I-----•:.•_.1 i.-.7_-_:-...I Ns,4•:,,,,,. 1 s. . .--j 1- :I:::-..1: ::::':.• ...I(7-wfu.S-A.V...... .,../...._..1/ 4.../.--...._ii 1.WE.........LL...._S AV I 1.........._,H cr., •• \\I I--1 L.• - .... ...........J.... - .......... .., ...., ..,. 4, r ----1 i---• . -7'; ;; _ (f., ., 0 1--.....— - ' •z 1 LLELLY J LIV N .J.. ---- ••••••...- - -!. 11 , 1-405 -1.r- !! .....--- "v‘V--. I-7k: sk Y..1[—PARK 1 FAV N It. ... _ i • I • PARK AV N 11 _ _ ...._ . . .. - 0 r-"--il = 11 '.\ .,•\_ --- ... _... I.. 1._. ,,.• ..........;:., ,A i/....• \\13, 1 ' 11 ,.. i CEDAR AV S 1 iv, A .fix• \ v\ tA i 1 II. N g r- \\'s .7.! \V" / \.\r.:‘..''igi,. ....7j1.C...A..R.... ,DEN I _AV N ii.. z" 1 i clz ......'..•••ili3 0 -.......... ----. -ta3 E 8 RENTON AV S ui z •--'''-i‘Ci 3'.. CO .!• P..v.‘:\i. \:..........,..•\i(1;•••41•N\\\\\\\\*?•47_1- I H ..Ji iii..(4.......ig...q.i.ti 5 • .. -- rn 'I / k.' --.:.:•'••...\\ i \Z 1 IFACTORYJ LAKii_ -i , . m (---*--. '..... •-••zr• '. 7.7.:•••••• 1.7-... v.: ....• .•• -4 . ..... •..... • ..tilA ii—i .. :,.4..t. • . , s, . .. • -! L_.....',.." li ,,, i t , // / • • -,;n's 4':' ''' • ' '''-• •'''' : :=4 N3 . •/// , -D...,„..... ,,• ,. -i,-.r.•-• 1 - "' - - - - -;;;;"'- - - - • sr -ti- - - - 0 I . ....:.„ <:',,..: PeA, ,,,,,,,,Ii'lliek,•I;,„'''','• S.spi.4..-ii 1.• ° 1 ...- . .•• I .1/ q \\" .,...",:it.,I••vplop,R,-;10,,,,;'..pi;i,'';:.,'•• ..tr.,,i...,;;;;-. -..... ,...,..01.' . „ , I •.•'.../,•,::.a.` ,,,L'Ai,:i.'....04itii*i.::4{itil,,!••,..,••: ,..... 147 / . ,...... i.. .. .......... I • I 44104 ./.: 1 1 ...i'!'• : )"ktepili1,74 .. „...,:. --•:. • •' /•• J••ilgrsie60,?. ,.'' %.•'..1,!".,,,.,...4.44.a...rfs.A..,A..,::,,,,,, , ,,.„4, ... ... . .. .. .• 1 /' i) I / ..,ii4tV•''ll'I31!' '.'.'.` ....v. ...,I2:..:''i' ‘.3,TtkiI.4:: III,.I:vi.,., .. ,.. .... .• ..• ••-•'' ••• . ..•"%. 1 i .t. • :.itit:?*'./'Nt•,:!.ff*?.IIII..; ;i..,*.",••Ei-' !ON?,I,I,I',.. • '''•-::.:--Z.--- ..•". I ././1/.)i, ...1 / EtIt'i h'T'.A,-...ETA,- /".•AN'J:-$.1-ftr';'4,E1'.' :1!;!Illir;I:Lrss'°r7;,„. ,..„,:\ ,....... .. , ..),.,N„.. ... /, /. N,.. T., 04,eriiliiiitgt„,•:?.-T.:! 'itt!,,;::,,,. .f.i.tfr, 7;:ftto:!.c:t•:,,t,... .„. • - • L'n ..,..e...":"'fir-i":737, .•......:......, _. I I t / /// r:il i ii.:,,,....,,.,.7."!:11,...,"•,1;4111;'iftiV,11:aztt,;2•,,,,,,..t.N.,::::,:;::::j ti...„,.,.•,:;:tti!. ..'X. _;,r,....::.....4.1:::-......:!;c:s.:i: •,'.i.,y imERDErN.,:, .. .... . . i 1 I , , . / „\.‘ ..- -- / • • lel I V•3:4 •':R:sts,r,. :A : --7..-- -31 N..0 .• -.. • .•" . I I I. z)• . // /' 1°1°44 1 ' '''''''-''4'7..4'4::*g.0':i2.1 Vi MI Z 0 a;'.117: ;;,.,, ‘. . •;1:::,N • ..41c., ,,,,, • , „, ,, „ ,. „ , , •• -,-*1-...---- . 1 I.• :.,:.!• • I 41!,- .1.-1\ 1 ,\ . / !. i r "LI. ;i.'`,> r f- :::..i,'t t.. k:,,,..„„ ,:•.,,,,..:y• ..i. : ,i...,.._:;,..-... •: 1 ;i.,,:i !!--t? ix, if; II , . , ...- ...•II 1 .., 1 I.I .. i!1!,-...1 I,,,,,,, t,•• , (Dm,).—__. L,,i1,,, % .,,,,;.. .., .. -._ ,••.::...,r---7.1 I. ...1-. );3 i; I 1 i.II I I ' irlIg I '41. '. ---1 Z-1 ''''' ''')1 ' ''';';'"'"' k'• • "n:''' 1: ,.....P.**7 li it I-ul 1 / ' ' . !ill I,!. . .. :, , i.,li nil , •‘'".E-„ Z 1 I.::::';:i 1 I:i.‘..':,.."..J.'iI: • I1- 4.:.:..i2, ..„.,.../...e! gi... .;..... I,r-, '3 1-3 • e , ... . : . I • i 1,1 1,.:1 i l'111 11! '10:1411e ill Il....; 1111:11 I'l c0C3 :,,,, 1/./..; ,,iiit .7,-ifi••ii]. . . iii.//C-A;..4-A-S AV..111L--1 I 11) i 1 ' i j ... 1 1 1 1111.11 i 1 I 1 li': 'i,t i •.*,..-• ^.:i....::::i:::,, •..;'..:::•i,::.::. .;•,, ,5;!i:7i,•• .;;.4! 4 7::•••••)/•......•• • • .- ; !., • .11 I ' i 1 . •. • I''i I ,, 't•!.'1'4,..,i!'.i,:!;:1,19; ,_,,.:-'..,;:i.:! ..ir..!.•'.... L. :: ,.... .,,e.I. ‘i... /,,. ,,, .,,)i li, -t 1 jit, / i 'fill i;i !I I,I )1: 1111:-1'1 !.1!' '.1',i. :'...ii.;'; '.1-41..!:'(-1.1:4:,i.i. ".'1,4.,rrrrIrrYii !..; II *tic- 13 0 CO > Z ',. /Ail' !lel:it'll;il. :41'1 41, it.t• tti ,i , ,1:0:. , id,. i i,1, .,r,;,,,,,,,,.:.".;;;• ,.: • • .....,: ,,:i.,,,......4:,,,.,,,,„;:;••....,_,-,..-. -:- -,..:. .;• ..1-.1.- ' • ,T;11 !I'l 1 t".;1 ., Il till illsi..:;,•,:i,""7".6k4,17,57,' ...- !,17A :,.,:. '", . 77-77r7 EDIJONuS AVE I I li ?'I! i •• • !..il • !0,I!! ,!.••"-1!.!:!!!....,i-,!1--1,,..... % • • !;,!..!,,.. 1.,?,,!. .! 2:'..i.,,,At•0, I 0..i l t . fr:ri i!, • ,Arn -< =-„Q) al Ill1.. ' i % ' " 4 11.1.;ligIT,I;i .)!Ilidfi.,Ivilillikill,it,!..,. . 1.. 1 .1, . , s. :•:1:i.,,T1-10.,.t. !.1...„ 1.,,IrfiF.-44ii, i.,.,.;..,,, •••_;.; iii, 1 ,. ,,• 1, • • ' ! .. . I II. ,;.!.1111.. .,i,i.4 4; ,. II• I,,:lit i 1 11,a-m.,. i . ...,•:filli:,,,, .0 1..!!!-e ill ,..;_'";...:'.f...,' 'i .''';',;:;;;;:i,i,;:0,..,•;,:„;:„ ,,,. L„.... \„.. .,,,,. . . . ,. . 0 Fri 0 K co .... 3:1 i •::-.1 i 1 . . . n ;1., ,01 i.;Ili' en 1'II i 1; . 1 ilil 1 q. 1:11::21i4.;11ii , t',,. ,:F,•...'i 'ii,i ",...,,. „..,:..: . ..i,. 71 7) ...I ,..., 0 .1,' > • •• • • • .. 7:) I . ' 1111111 I 'I l• 111:' I Illn III/ I 1 1III co cnr,1 n-- i'll .!1 i 11 1..i..1 ‘,,.lovir,11%, •1 ,y,-, wft:•.:. . % ,, ' . ''. \ 1. I 11' '1'' :I'll 'l'" >-r- - i '' ,'i 1 1.1) ii .,i.-177.Piit,'Ir, •!,:ly,;;;;,-,-,411-,,;A;'; . i. ,, HARRI.NG TON AV.;L. ‘ I.:1 111 i II 1111.1 IF 1'411 CD C>C i i i' ! II, 11! r:.l'i,:liiW41.,,I.I .:'.--, ',11?! ,!`","711...-,. • ..• :.• ". ... ! -.s .. . . ., iA Pi r- z m LI ! ) I '"; ii ,.I„•, NI. rill, i 1,1111 -'' I z"4 III' I, 111 1. 1'. I.11 ''..11(1411',. . 1.,:'•,.N.,': ....2A;;;I:rty.t.i1';f17:1= 1:z ','_*._ .• 1,1. . lid 4* 0 0 CI > -< : i s )/• II 1;1 I 01 ilill 1 Ili !, Z I a I ! I. II' I• 1 ii I.ii li '\'':', .;:.•''11'''. :!!.....!:;: i:Vi C:,1:- - . •,1 I irn t'ir'ci,!....,t, ... '.,,, •, Illili.,11 1•!'j1,11 i 1111 , -7.7t ''' :171T7....\k•1/41:':::.:1;..5 i....‘ '')\•••\. „,• . r•,•, , 33 5 Cn I : 1 iii •.1,i It1 1 l I'i lill'jr•;$1, I 1 ., •• M.< ' / ; './i.i ''1 e..1:i I 'lid 1 i', 11 III Ililig1111D1111'1111d;Ill 1 ti 'id I ill' 1.1 ...0.4 irl'..fr,,,,,.g1;.;', •• 4,7•.:474,2'.•^7."' .: ;..1 c..,--. %,.., ,i R. . ;,..., 5 K '‹ ' I I /1". • l'll'ill 11.11°'1 l'.1 III I i Thil' Plidllill 1 Id i ' iil Ili • 1 I 0'.10•Ltg.,7'tg.ter'•.:.t.:?..!::•:• ::.:::,:4•:,:.:.!•t..,.. : ,.... ..,._.........,:..._..! / '''•'•'. • 11111' III•V 1. II 1 I i 1 II IIJI tt:! i'll'ii''Mil 4'1 11 li 'lit 'III i:1 I i 1...1PAY? tt,...,_•.'t ..,t.)Nt:27tr:t..*rt,...N\ \•,,. . •,.., ! > Z •... t ' '• •- d: '1.,I I I. Il '' 'II ; I • "" r‘ '",eiti .•-rlii,:!i,ii,i;iiiii:••••r=t - ,s. .... . .. , .. i,;.._ i • ..': '. '. :::.rill 11 I,' I I,I'il • I, li,i I ,• i I i p . , •11 .40.4-1t1ii:KiIN!1!nii.:.N.. ...„,,,,,Et •:.-.:v...\ ..1, ..,. , ...... ...I I-_ _ ..: 13 --I ...,,, . :.. :•.;.- .:;;.:. .!:,•.: .I i!,I I .. 1111 I I .k•4fr'O•110.•4. .'.71i'''"''' ' . . "I'llI-,.;-:.••• s-\''- - . .61"riiiiii ::'•:1\ %% • AV aootou 1 i./ . I 1;;;:, • .;" ue•t.i.tEt.. .:,.. ."'•:!:.':,':' ;.ii 7... ....tt.:••• ...,.,:;,•• :1 1. 1 1 1 i .41.401..4111,40,A,,...,.,Ay, , .„,„ , . , ,,.... . 0 '' 4'••!:••'•.•iti:iii,:,:. ..,i,;.., . \ : 11 // . 1 . ..: •1 .;•.i::' : :'•:''';''' ..! ! 11 1 i 101 • 1 • 41141i 441r. 7,40Atig I................................... ‘ i , I .t • . ':•i i iii• 4,.•Ti' (..1,:.,;.•':: • ....: .- .'i..,.;:.•; . ;:i-.:.:11'. . -'‘... ii'; II'141111i .; Lutti: T"e1),,,. .. * . ;k 4 ...• 1..!... .... -.1.::_-,,T:; :.--....-• .< ! : -.:..':-.:.: '.'.'•;...'.';..''''''''. ••• '''''''' IN 1,1 WI, , . vir..unim....A. .0. 41111'''''''. ...; ..... • ...,. ,,f,..,;.' -...r---- i II , • 4:1;/,.)./ 4,/i./(... .1)'. ".•.'.i.:',i!il:::1..' :-::.7.'H-:. • ''..'' .' 11'.: ' .. ' '.•1 '• • *.- . "--•-,--,..,,-;;AL- svAiarrA: .• -'! %,,i,!.'; -/-#7, '.7-7. ., . l'. ...,-.7-. ..tt.•7!- . it•ii',t'.vin't;'7.!t'' 777'7' '','.• •• !'' V77.1•1'!.177F':. it,,/4114Lliter,db,IIF ftit t ?h iii•'.il' ' I. •I I I - !'l I- - - . .- - - ..' i 1/..i...„ ..•::i ....7.17**?L•.i.;.11,b.'i: . !!..: .••!:': ',I.i ..:.: .!!.!..,.:;1!1 illift!..qi:!:!:..;jji -!: 1i. .:%:..r i-VIraT1ir,1167461,#44.44 4ii ! V'i. .gi,......„„ , ,...„.. , ,Isql: 1 ,• z, 4-.1.;,,, ..., I ___ -, •-:. ,._ ,, • • .,::i,i:,:k:'..,Tr;1 ; •1 •tr" (." rn 3'. • •li 11 Y • ••••'::W'./•:••:'•••'...• -•:••:• ..''•!• .'•.• .!iii'A•ii :! CD r- ..;:. !:!....i..• :. ,.,;. ,,. •.:..,..i.,.-g 1,,,,!.: rip-iyik Nr,,zino:• , ,,.:•,,,,,::.:,!. v, • •...._ . • : . •; _< 3.3. l'...' lit::../....t.:: ::..i..::::):H.:::7S....;1'::.;Ii .i:II::1:::::::'';Ii::..i:'1 ii • 1•1:1:.i :i:P. 11!:;:.11..:17:!1:1::;1AF4 g''1::'1:4476,.4847.464;:vt*' 5'. ...,7'...,.:::,..':..":I rns. I. ' :•;1 , il .- 1 I • / :....'t4::i''''. :.:::::.: .: :f'Y'....'•....:N •":Lff:',1' 0)'" :•:! ••• . ..:V4 tii.i:::. ' , . :' .": 1117-47440414.4.,k4..p.1... :1ii,!!..::;, . '. i 1'1 1 1 c2 . r..... .1' i .///".. ......-. ..' ''''.:..,..F:•...'. ...../...• •.:::'. : :. • \;''''..:::.i ..: - '.:.:..'.. "::. .:;H:.'' ." • : ' . ... ,%' .4++f$0.1......m; •,r,. . .:,ia.r,;.,..:.: :::11 L -. ,r4 I * c> ,i' , :::..s,..... H, -o ::..• . . i', : „...,...k; ... .. L. - , rito .... . . . ,/ dot,,46; ,,,.„.„,,,/,.1,13,.,1,.;:, ,..,,,,,. - • ..„..... r- = , i/ /'ii.:.::. :..1 :.". .. .. - . , ,..,rn ',......,",.1.. 0 .,..:. • .L1Ks.,, ..,.):NN.,..,...,.....N.4,. 4,40.40.-40,4,IP.2.,N.,. -,..-...,,..7, .. --.4.,, -. t*: ..:•.:•:•• •.:•.• •: CO 111 / / /•.':,•' ••••-•:.•/•'::.1 : •••::•••••• :-.7.'• • : >0> ....::::•'::::'*:' ! ... a ,;.1;: :4' ;::.::7=77; =.40 44t.....A.,k,41:Atik,,441,1,47.,...r •:•t:jiratAbet,,,- Nr,,,,, „;4,,•,,,..„7 a j 1 I 1 I, •/ / :,,.:. ......i.: /:•..:-.•, ...•:•::: :...... .., • .,./ / . • • :.,::, 0*-4:f. • ''..::.1 . ,:. •:...• •:t".i.:.: t • 7: '..: .4110:AlOrdare,Priar+140 41 liii.i 1:::. -,,.::,:;;;i:M I.513.7tr,7,31:,:_NI.• : --;: -.. 1 yr.., • .."4: /,k .i......:: k-z,T,..: • :: :,:.,.r. ,::.,.,.....• .",..:::: .:, ,;:.,..-.F.;',,.:,,...,'.',.'L'.,,,,':..,14,741,0k046:4,....51)1A,A ?.,•.-io,4,,,Mi,!'S4i,1'A:, -,4:,,A..1,in.,7. - ,- i ' ,//,( C.> : .'• (/)5:11........,:•: . ..1-....V.•..H'.; ..-....: l..;:.:::•,:•YI'l.!'•!;.:-: •••.•:',,:..•..•: ; dihi. 1PTIONO- '1457:4,11,IL..„......,:!,1:;t'':!;liAqii T'91.:.iy,144iAy 4 41K4 • .-03visyyg . ,7; k; -vo 4.trr; . . ,i:!"7•!?':4 ..". EE;•••.., 1:•••••.'•,,• ',V;:....7,: i.•'::',.''7'' :•.'!^•:. 1:.?:,;i• 7.2110,4, 46,AN..481.-0 ...1,6,,:v:,,ii.,. .... ., .•,.',71•4'..., Alk 44Ik 'tiq....-::::-•"; i • .....: ' .•--:: '' '.. 4 ', ::::. '!4II:I?.., •.:,:';'...:`.:: ./:! :,I A V iIi.i.i.'i:iSt.lc.vr-guy... -4`,P,Ii'g 114'.;••:'11 ;i";'"..' ', .401 a 1 i., . . . '''•' ...:"I"'.''''''•. •' ..-•-. - •Yr,..!•4' i iiii,i• .&•!Ilb 41% ...1.4.-,. •E ID lip I, () .14. 53 2 . •:. '.:.;::'.' . .::.: •'-::::...;.:rL : •. : '' . ...1i,:11A4 .,.:. /WA ..4jp.r.innwe.---, ,...! Y..ii41I;. iii r, , .,.. 4: ,... l tn,., Ilt".-- .:i ...- rn •' :,: ..•'' ::::.::::::.::1....:ii:........irirWi!:1.:..::....-:.....::.' .::. '::• '.::;ii:!,.7441..,.%41V17117.1 ,11111,1:14166-vAim.41116-1kAVIVIe.c&-INW.,,A,VA.l' 1 .....:.'..;.' 7..AF61441W4 IS 7116.0„•;i1;,.....; • tpa i iii : :' *:.:.' -..:;....UNION:AV:gi41t. '•..:. L....:.•.•:.•'L'••:••'.',i i.,,f2f,r.01p,..,,apagiepri,-7 -000.4, Ny •., -1 vr .....i. 40 I ! ' •'.....•...:---,. 1 / 4‘:-. -'- + 7 .-.7 1-- "' ... , az •i.f*i.....-.2,1,:n., .0.:::./......,,,,:....j7,,,,..........n,..:::::::7y, :.:... :::::.•.:74„...,;,.:. t........... . 1.&eiondb, 4' 4,ttol .1. . 1,4 1 ,: -=z-,.,...7.,..i.,...,E•:-::.::•'1:.1., -..:Iy.:. ,,:•.-:',•••:".:,.:.-,:•.:-.:....',. ::. .:.:..• green r,(11 IN o ti 1.1:w..., ......k.0,c::..-•4:.:,,c,•,,,......: r..• •-..s•• •,••••:• i.,, .. ...:. .....,:•,....:.,:••• ••••:-:-.......::.,...,,x. ... - - : 3 i.".:(i .-.1 --i-- ..--;--.1,-- - --Nr.• - --------....---,. .geot., ,.. 1 1:;. 1.4, -,::::. -4. ...,:,..:..,.:1 ,,,, ::.:"r%:,.., _.---.::: :•••'..•••: •:.•:,...:,,..•.:••:-..... :.....:.........ii,.. _.A.A._4 I 1 M 11! -',-,‘;7, / • —„ 1 ..:.. ...;; ::.u..:.: ,,: . -.......::•.1'......:.' ....•::1.--4.,:l..-; .,..,...:!.!,...,....... ..:./.,iF,•,....fi...: irsirogyr4r40 . s A ( f , ., . ;) .C,,j•f:.•:-..:- ,.......•.:7.:-...::::.::::i.. !::........-.:•.•.-., Ai. I . ... \ = .....V . .:>.t(Ciif....:. 4740r7 ;4;542, 1• '.) I S\ -±Li k.. y...... ,.:. .:...,.,...,........... 4.......(.... .....„.. ...,. , ... .0,4.41.0*At:0F.. 111111 . .'•.c:\ .L.:..... :4f,:... .•:Tr •:'..? .•. .i;. .. eh, A A , A . \ % I .k ..."...,. ..N. ,I.,..t........... vor;o1014,441,..7„ ;1 [II 1 1 !. 1 •1 ] \ , .::.::.........:..... ...„,,....„••.:.,• , v.‘40:3:0-- v 1 r 0.• : ii ; IL it> t ),, L.._ki,......... ,:;••• __11_ , °MC 3E li I,I /<\ ... •••• ii -.-. -- . -- . I -.....---- ...:::-...:.-.:.. ---') \ •• . .4611# ,_.:.:r IA Il I I I lic./. .:4,1 i !. 11' 1 :51 PL:---1-1' ij t-\- 41:-.... -.- -1 ilT...._J-PIJI4z.ict711-- .""si .7"----: _J i3 _........ ill LI...... ro.:1 .74.a........L:-.-3 I i il IOW A'a a It ..., r . 1 \-- IIIMPII IMMi IMMIMI S WU'AK'SE _ 1 4 ......• i I FT i ?,,e74.. 0 i i_ illi1:11h. -_—.. ,..,1,,...*It .......................................................... ., „. ). CD CD I-, I • S 6 / J iiiil 1.1 2 R-I ) "Ite..,• ! VI 4 III i, 4 1 C :t ' i 1 0 li 1 -JE---1 * ,,-- . r') II 11 Fri 1,!1'8 MN, 14 ...i, II , ii........._.... .... 4Stli AK SE ..- I ini I ar---, (1-,== ....7:71. . _ _. . S ------"^-1 . -.- - t' ... -.-. .Iq ....-. .-t''-' "* 1, , -1!--"-) 1 INVI FL............./71-- i 1 ,......,1• I i •-•--).1 z • • K in ....-,.. > - 173 .--f r et 1 > - M • "*.g1:1- '.-..7-7). —. 14 1M 1- i 1 . • • - -1 - - .-o• I 1.' i Li L.-- -,..i , • . ‘ 00. .... •rnm ll . , ‘Li_ ' i R. c4 710 Z , II ••t .... rt III cci ...I. rt (1 114 \ I; 1 . . ...., ,, \ \ ii J i co • rt \N1 > . 41111111111111111 L. c�-v --,.. - � c7 Z • ' = 2 L < •..• -0C iZI_ Z vC 0 Z Z CD ta?...r.' §7. ('''..) i' 3a''' CD .� ^' 9 a 5amq c c c -4- Z cc, Ist a ^1 —Nc v 9 �'� Z3�� Z �i7 �) • ;' N a — • A _ f� CD to• 1 CD �• n I'*'1 r*-1 (f) • ! _ a � _. cam — D q ' 1- I et' a a" �� i0 = G G (../1 N41 - -- MA 17-----.-. • . . 111 — --: 77 ait rift ----- mg- .. . ---.: - V --- . ---- --• im ..._. ...i; 8 rt i ... _ Irt ` -- — r• .. ....-. elme IV F N 46' ...... NM ii41110-nim.- -siti-i=1:777..wratik.40:. ....4, prr.,51 .ei _ ____ ._, _ _ . . alli ,ii , =me. ilri-i.:$ 1 ,iiivigilini: go I W Its' lip, 4II!Ipç!�t i _cr7 a ..111 ,a,it-..: inalllirridgp -:,:Jas librif , i'• .1ffig,IFIElmalligiriffine . pi _ L ��: III 1: !ice E�10111ii :_m ; �■ iii m . Emal"."1111 in i. A mit 42 111511(Mew sre AWE=4.417141111.11111111ALMIIIL 17! 12110111-111.tab V I !CAM!gralaidnir.vrissia, No twessamompivisi � ill- � ..- : ;744.2 itt-.101 as. .11" .frilrf :'-- .91=1 - �. '.:ar...i :v:=_:_vw.m. .....d. ..miNI F .�%EW . Z.T.' ;: . •-._-.' Gii.�.� �� �� �� i It�r = -AP A 76-::=.--Ekv,wieritimanno-sammi me 411‘44,1010. :21r7-- il A---. .-4,..-,..4.„ ,.... his .,< -..: .-: raCrilikaral : <7%(Y > �_ = Yea:�:.�j � a . -.. ��,,� • v�� Y> � < Y IN•41 II&- ::.f tawill 111111 -Err IMMO afIll. 11.111 . rs, • uppripp,23 • • ? a/N/IWIMMIIII a:1w=mu ,AIL I Eimmom •, 4 x fr. < ,. ,< . TIM urif=por mwrwramhiagNIIIIII : <,.)N., ,,c),( . Nie r mama! 1 a "mrierniZmui A Y( A • '‹ i , . 1 Ettimeiv& 111 MINI ,1 , 11: MI 0. _ Hi!, ;g5-7,,ilia... 1.1=1.67._.-.10•11...z.: ahun. . �1 v. ;._:� ,...m. ..�!i ! III i Iin (Kb, . ,,... . =. . Igo ....-mr.....malin 16,N.. : Ilifilla- :. viiipmmeranamoinki\l,t VI ov \.0.1*.alinsi ;AI MIIIII4V Hal illiZti di he.. lit iini \IMF" • IN iiiro _P- wiroftezigr ... lemev .•./..........__-_: amesinfa mitsi • iudsor-Anni. _ -.11mi "al- --. 11191:-71=-010: 4;4 1 9 MOP III_____ Ah_______4:11W Ve ,iii T ikago iiiammuu - - --=-401 .i-.. .iii_-: .tiv AI ---,,Efirm __ . -, __ •ii Op. pm illoomm`V ›, C to I fy = ' n g rt b7 3.2.4 Significant Unavoidable connection exists between the surface Adverse Impacts water and groundwater of the study area and the groundwater extracted from the 3.2.4.1 Alternative 1 - Maplewood Maplewood wellfield. The following Heights sections describe the geology and hydrology of the area and the potential There are no significant and unavoidable impacts of the alternative actions adverse impacts to surface water considered in this DEIS. associated with the Maplewood Heights Alternative. 3.3.1 Affected Environment 3.2.4.2 Alternative 2 - South The following paragraphs review the Highlands geology of the area, describe how water moves through the subsurface, and There are no significant and unavoidable provide a framework for understanding adverse impacts to surface water the groundwater of the study area. associated with the South Highlands Alternative. 3.3.1.1 Geology 3.2.4.3 Alternative 3 - West Sediments within the study area are Maplewood sands, gravels, clays, and silts which glaciers and rivers have deposited over There are no significant and unavoidable the last 1.8 million years. These adverse impacts to surface water sediments are contained within a "basin" associated with the West Maplewood of bedrock, which was formed between 2 Alternative. and 20 million years ago. Groundwater is contained or "ponded" in the bedrock 3.2.4.4 Alternative 4 - No Action basin; this basin is not a smoothly shaped bowl, however, but rather a There are no significant and unavoidable buried landscape of hills and valleys. adverse impacts to surface water This ancient bedrock surface was associated with the No Action formed by two primary forces. First, the Alternative. movement of continental plates over millions of years has pushed, folded, and 3.3 GROUNDWATER thrust the bedrock upward. Second, ancient rivers cut valleys down into the The proposed East Renton Interceptor bedrock. However, unlike the ocean, raises concerns about groundwater for which we can penetrate with vessels, two reasons. First, the City of Renton cameras, and other scientific relies entirely on groundwater for its instruments to map the topography of potable water supply. In the future, a the bottom, we cannot see through the large portion of that supply will be met deposited sands and gravels deposited in by a wellfield within the Maplewood Golf the recent geologic past to map the Course, which is just outside the bedrock peaks and valleys beneath southern edge of the project study area. Renton. Second, data indicate that a direct East Renton Interceptor Project Groundwater Draft EIS 42 November, 1991 . I CHAPTER 1 SUMMARY I 1.1 PURPOSE AND NEED East Renton Interceptor is one way to Ireduce this threat. The City of Renton currently has inadequate sewer capacity in the South 1.2 STUDY AREA Highlands, Heather Downs, and Maplewood sewage basins . To define the geographic limits of the I Consequently, the City Council passed sewer system analysis, the sewage Resolution 2764 which placed a basins affected by the different moratorium on any new construction alternatives were identified (see Figure I • within these basins (see Appendix F). 2, Existing Sewer Basins; Figure 3, After imposing the moratorium, the City Maplewood Heights Interceptor, Figure Council directed the Public Works 5, South Highlands Interceptor; and i Department to solve the capacity Figure 6, West Maplewood Interceptor). problems in those basins. The basins were then combined into a project study area, where a 1 The purpose of this Draft Environmental comprehensive impact analysis was Impact Statement(DEIS)is to assess the conducted (see Figure 1, Study Area). consequences of three possible sewer I interceptors to solve the capacity LB DESCRIPTION OF problems. The most effective interceptor ALTERNATIVES alignment should minimize the future 1 cost of connection to service lines and Four alternatives are evaluated in this prevent groundwater contamination of DEIS: (1) Maplewood Heights the Maplewood aquifer. An interceptor Interceptor; (2) South Highlands iis a pipeline that receives wastewater Interceptor; (3) West Maplewood flow from collectors or lift stations, and Interceptor, and 4) No Action. Each conveys the wastewater to a treatment alternative, except the No Action i • plant. Alternative, achieves the objectives of the project to varying degrees (see The East Renton Interceptor project is Section 2.1). The No Action Alternative proceeding on a track separate from the provides a basis for comparing the other City's Comprehensive Sewer Plan alternatives. The estimated cost for adoption and Comprehensive Land Use construction of each action alternative I Plan Update for two reasons. First, the was $4,000,000 in July 1989. Given a City is facing an existing sewer capacity construction cost increase of seven problem within the study area that must percent between 1989 and August 1991, I be corrected. Second,it has become clear the estimated cost of each action that exiting and future septic systems alternative is about $4,280,000. within the study area are a threat to the ICity's water supply. Construction of the East Renton Interceptor Project 1 Summary Draft EIS November, 1991 I Although the K i` g County Community Iran Zoning of RS- 15000, or Comprehensive Plan designates all of the at a density of 3 dwelling units per acre study area as urban, the Newcastle Plan using septic systems (see Figure 12 and does not implement the policy. The Table 3.5). It was also assumed that all Newcastle Community Plan emphasizes, the vacant land within the City of however, the importance of providing Renton would be developed based on the adequate utilities at a reasonable cost. City's Six-Year Renton Trends. In other It also recognizes the inherent costs words, single-family development would when planning does not accommodate a occur at 2.2 dwelling units per acre and demonstrated need. multi-family development would occur at 19.2 dwelling units per acre; about 3 The Newcastle Community Plan's multi-family units would be constructed utilities section addresses the East for every single-family unit, and about Renton area and specifically the 3.6% of the area would be developed as Maplewood Heights area (Policy N-53), commercial property. Applying these and discourages building the interceptor. factors to the South Highlands Interceptor, about 3,779 additional While the density of the Maplewood dwelling units could be constructed (see Heights area caused it to be included in Table 3.8). Approximately 1,757 of the Sewerage General Plan's local sewer those units would be single-family and service area, the Newcastle Community 2,022 would be multi-family. This is the Plan pointed out the lack of evidence for highest number of single-family units septic system failures in the area. It anticipated for any of the proposed recommended that the interceptor not be alternatives. constructed, because at the time there were no documented, irreparable health City of Renton Comprehensive Plan hazards. However, as discussed in (1986) and the South Highlands Section 3.3, the City believes that the Interceptor . existing drainfields in the study area pose serious threats to the City's aquifer. For those lands within the City of Renton, the South Highlands Interceptor 3.4.3.3 Impacts and Relationship of supports the Renton Comprehensive Plans and Policies to Plan which calls for sewer service as the Alternative 2 - South preferred method of sewage disposal. Highlands Interceptor tinder this alternative, very few acres of the unincorporated land would be The South Highlands Interceptor has the capable of receiving sewer service. • smallest potential service area of the Therefore, the South Highlands three alternatives being considered. Interceptor would not implement the Under this alternative, it would not be Comprehensive Plan's preference for possible to serve additional vacant land sanitary sewer service over on-site currently outside the Renton city limits disposal to protect the City's (see Figure 5). Therefore, it was groundwater supply. assumed that all vacant land currently outside the City of Renton would develop The South Highlands Interceptor allows based upon the existing Newcastle sewers to precede new development East Renton Interceptor Project Land Use Draft EIS 83 November, 1991 1 Nile Iwo Land Use Newcastle Community Plan (1982) and the develop in a mariner consistent with the East Maplewood Alternative existing Newcastle Community Plan Zoning, resulting in about 4,175 new dwelling units The East Maplewood Alternative would conflict (see Graph 6). About 1,594 of the new units with the Newcastle Community plan in two ways: would be single-family and about 2,582 units (1) by installing sewers in an area designated for would be multi-family. on-site sewage disposal systems: and (2) by accommodating development at urban densities. City of Renton Comprehensive Plan Although the King County Comprehensive Plan (1986) and the South Highlands designates all of the study area as urban, the Alternative Newcastle Plan does not implement the policy. The Newcastle Community Plan emphasizes, The South Highlands Alternative would not however, the importance of providing adequate address the City of Renton's objectives/policies utilities at a reasonable cost. for sewer service over on-site septic systems to protect the City's groundwater supply. The Newcastle Community Plan's utilities section addresses the East Renton area and specifically the The South Highlands Alternative is also in Maplewood Heights area (Policy N-53), and conflict with the Plan's goal of connecting all discourages building an interceptor, dwellings to sewers. It is similarly in conflict with the Plan's policy that Maplewood Creek While the density of the Maplewood Heights area Sewer Drainage Basin be served with sanitary caused it to be included in the Sewerage General sewer interceptors. Plan's local sewer service area, the Newcastle Community Plan pointed out the lack of evidence King County Comprehensive Plan (1985) for septic system failures in the area. It and the South Highlands Alternative recommended that the interceptor not be constructed, because at the time there were no The South Highlands Alternative is in conflict documented, irreparable health hazards. However, with the King County Comprehensive Plan's as discussed in Section 3.3, the City believes that policy to support planned urban growth at the existing drainflelds in the study area pose urban levels of service. The lack of sewer serious threats to the City's aquifer. service under this alternative would affect the densities that could ultimately be permitted in 3.4.3.3 Impacts and Relationship of the study area. Since this alternative would not Plans and Policies to extend service to the Plan's local service areas, Alternative 2 - South it would not allow for the conversion to urban Highlands Alternative densities that the Plan specifies should occur as pan: of the evolving planning and development The Interceptor would serve properties within the process. present city limits and allow for service to a small area hhat is currently outside the city limits (see Newcastle Community Plan (1982) and Figure 5). Since most of the service area is within the South Highlands Alternative the city limits, the land use projection of this assumes the entire service area would develop The South Highlands Alternative would be according to the Six-Year Renton Trends. Vacant consistent with the Newcastle Community lands that are outside the potential service area of Plan's recommended residential densities of 1 the South Highlands Alternative were assumed to to 2 units per acre for the unincorporated area East Renton Interceptor Project RH2 Engineers, Planners, Scientists Final EIS 67 November 1992 .i..7.. 1 = .. 0 " 3e4- LS-E Iwo' .141110' Y .. < •..i = L r C u s. .a O ..o '1 E u L.c e S ='E1 2S v E 2.+ ~ 2 v - e."o r E E = .3 1 9 1 V osro2UE `• 0 • ..y U O =Y r o ciir u e6 � YN ��a �a ,g � 3 aa� o2Bu+ Q. a'S2 o' �4i o2` 3 • u U u"- n I S a o >.o r u -. m a va i evo` aCeo 9 ; 4282 a � ..3 ' 4 _40 _ _ aq eb.s c eo g S.F � « = ost . li v. eaafi o^ i >g u3sr. wC u . 3 ' S 4 s gci; a 2. SM a N I a CI. L+ 0 0 0 e • •w L. .n e • e 4 Y tl 4 L es tl • 00C444 .04 40 4 v • • 4 4 0 >..t ..L L 0 0 • 4.0 4 0 Y Y Y 0 Y ..> O V 4 e 0 s 0 M C-A O C L L• ••C M 4 H M Y E. 0000 ,040u .4 4.. 4-r OL C.r •a. C C-. 4 4 0 Y 4 0. • en Y 44 43 • , 44 ..M 3 3 Y .. 0Lti..-. aM o - 4 0 t. U V Cw.0 4C Y 4 Y •.4.+� e . M .• tl.. -0 C e.. 2 'v >` pAY 4..1 Y • 43 44Oe.* eC • 4. 4a 4$ >.7 V 0....M • H C• y40 0 ti > 4 k 3 • 4 0 >. C 4,,. O R a • 4 C C V Y 4 O g O R rr O a 0 4 C Y •C q A 4'C a .r L • •'. H C • O ~3 Y R .r 4 C O Y C • >.Y .r.. a rti 7.. 7 441 •.4 4 " 0. 0 "'. ...3 L .r .i -'• 0.7 4 C 4 > R M 4 4 4.00 .. • 4 H 0. A 4 0.0 8 Y 4 0... e 4 R M 0.I. C 0. .-4 0� V - Y • .0 M ~.0 4 0 0 -. N'0 1., M A w Y. to C Ln lJ „ S O C = • C O r ".eZ O ►' O a O...R.. 0 .+ 0.MU,°c Y.00 3 ~ ' Y C.Y. 40 LY.C V v • a e.4 0 O I. M e . 4, 0 Y L•, C Y • 4 >. O V 0 •~ 4.4 41 0.4 L �-M C 7 4 .r rr • 7 V .7CC. • L• V r. �. O Y i C e--. C 4 Y C Y Y e 4 M • e • • V'C • () 4 is 4.0 a 8 C M 0.=- 4 0.4 4-.-0 M • • R~ >, 4..L.0 M •014 R 4 C V 0 .,Cr 4 Y 3 A° a • 3 t4.. 3 C"V, O C • a C A • 4 0 • p 0.4.0 C •w 0.ar N c u rr.C. CO 2 YC C.04 4.OyOCX ...4V9L. 4ytl� • V ~ k LLi00.->.i 1 >.7M� y 0O .. a�113. M 0 2 C O„R� •� oA Y y 3. 4 .n'a 4 4 M4,000R000 ..Z`r +C.11OA CO q 4 u f, o eta O.4rY •o RY ~.CO .0.i4oy RU0"4 0 �44 • o C94gA 44_4 n`M4 CM eO=P...410 = 0 .0 A4.... 4 MM4 -040 Cama y y• 0 > - H++ A4.. • 04 ..C,. • 9 a . y N Y C .0 •a .0 . •p C 7 .4M V L. 4 .. 4, 4�'4 Or O.. O x 0: . .�4 8 • ..�. a =y.yY C4 X • O 9 0-..� •� 4 7.0 a V,,, R.n •.4 ./> 7 0 rc W U 0411..... H 4 .3. C O ti V O=-Vi 0 p e O O 4"w y0 • y p O Q • +. ..W ... 0.• O G • 1. 4 �. C O U C Y '� C V ~ 4 Y C > C 7 3 "L r+ .. •y V fF.. 0 e .. • M '3 L Y 4$4.-Oi N 4 yt C • 4 4 0. V.O.w Cw;4 .r g n R h p • H.CW 0a •CQ.�>jd 'O 0 r m ._.L1G .+ V O n 7 0 Y w C R C.r C C M Y O M 4 W • M O L L o 0 4 C Ol 4 4 .4 4 r+ Y 0�-. 4 a 0- tl .. 0 X 4 0 O • Y y. • M..0.(L.�,M,. M O r .0 0= 4 5 ' YN a �" 0 4 0 01 L •.V.r 0 014 0 . 3 L.-4 yOiL R.. a ~ C 7 Y 0., O C O^• C V V V n L M E.. 40.00 4 O.0 ., O • t" Y.,.� C-'� "'.� Oy0"'. >Va H >, •,4y e Y @ O4 Y a •-•ul¢ eYt eM $4 M+4 ..'04; �CD; A �+ .4r• Y C 4 • > . C O.Mi O.rr N.L Z a 4 a N M es_ F. C ••+ U.00 0 >p L•. C Y V J 0. • • 4 • M O"+ ,, .r 44 .y"' 0 U 4 •• ~ 0 •.4�. 4.0 • Orr • CC • y o'OM ;a ..U , a AC a >.a M VC 4 7 0M ■ .0�. 0.•M MC 4 .0.0 L4. 4 4-4•U R c Z ;• ..g a 0 0 x...6 14 4 4 ~ 4 V 4 C 7 ~Y~ R• C^ O R •M ,yC� •N C • MM NFU A.�-. ar.0 4M 44aCV. 04 H.. .. 04 .ax0.084 74+ •AOM 4r0 Y •G. e7 • MO AC • 73+C+M AO 04.-. 4vV0 -7-.~ A •0a+ • • �j40..• C40 CO 0.410.40 0 .. = y4M M MUY • C-.0 49 L >.0 Y A •M 4• .Q ..O 4 00, HO 4C 0 00 ° C • 40s 0 • • 40. > >N.C.~ .4X O CO a4 ....O.r ON C 00C • . CO 04A A04 • 4 e.0 0-• OC y Y4 04+..4C MO M...O >l • .0 4 0.4i 4..C . 0 4.4 C Y 0.M .Ra' R.... 4 4• • 4 Y C 7 r, y V O 4 y 4 M 0 • C •S • O • 48 .... V C e C R-. ?.0 4 a 0 4 .0 04 44 0 3 y M C tl 0 • •04 Y.+A•...L C.. 0 0: 0•4 .� L 7 0.4 C 4 V Y 044440. 4 M 044 C 44 4.1041. 04 - 0.. 4.. CY.0 400 A OS= • • .9 410 0000. 0.0. O Y 5 0 0.0 Y 4 V Y C O Y 0. 44 7 y 0.4 0 4 4 H C 0 4 0 • 4 F M 4 0 I0 • V > Y $ 0 0 *. 003 > o 4 4 0 3 4 7 44 4 400044 D o e 0 M Y •W rr e L •-r C O.-.0 4 4.0 • e 4 OA O Os O.. 4 C .Crr 7,.... 4 A 0.> R OG 0 X 44. S. 4= CG .E..3 Sn-• N L.5-. 3 R 4 J 0.Y Z C 4 L.. Y.ti Z Y.0 4 3 0 E• •M,X C 4 I. R 0 14 Y Y C kL V O ►r V 44...r 3 N 14..Lar, mcn - T I ',kw. Noe — a. L. N: •• e �• Sunset •� .A. 8r } S�� on %ssavuah Rd ixot lc • NE 12 St [-..,- I Alt t�tatt>,,sta�>. _ 5:,� Lys ,, �/,Psrit Or 4, ,�a, • NE 1Oth St Z-Z--J ' -u, tip C N y W friOrr/ a/1 �`�� NE7thSt -9 • < <in prperij • ��� /\t_ s am a s>• m A 1 > N 1 hleirl tZti $ = C ' X� �1:1;1 ;� t/" L''i1W 2Il' WL'ILL�1 Lil1VJL1�,LWJL tVJWi sr = =• jy : a �. .t.. .-AP ei l . Oct lh) �t ttt�j 51 1 j_� IIL al 1 ;� N _ • ).44IS R_NtON <. W�, } t • • c • 44• t _i v /•y } �1 r-� ` i liinG St __ satustaaittftsstttttttttl " r- - L . .,. • {��-►gr. • L .-- - -•••••J CI, Md )lc..! 7 c"... - hp `` 1 R jntan Mae/e yar•Y Rd �\ Po 1 J _ t� 1E9 I;`,a'y c,;,t; I se I Figure 17 Existing METRO Transit Rout: •••••• Route 1n i.i...i Route 106 -• Route 114 ►e.t t t t ll Route 147 anamu. Route 107 0 Tn.-zit Poiat Attachment J Table 3.11. Ea'tt Renton Interceptor Traffic Stul"y Intersections Meeting High-Accident Standard ' Intersection Average Annual Accidents NE Sunset Boulevard/NE 3rd Street 20.3 SE 128th Street/138th Avenue SE 16.7 Maple Valley Highway/I-405 Northbound Ramps 12.0 NE 4th Street/Union Avenue SE 11.0 NE Sunset Boulevard/Bronson Way North 10.0 NE Sunset Boulevard/Union Avenue SE 6.7 NE Sunset Boulevard/138th Avenue SE 6.0 NE Park Drive/I-405 Northbound Ramps 6.0 NE Park Drive/I-405 Southbound Ramps 6.0 NE 4th Street/Monroe Avenue NE 5.0 Source: City of Renton,TDA Inc. • Table 3.12 Existing Transit Service to and from East Renton Route Areas Served Frequency Number 106 Kennydale,Renton Highlands, Downtown Renton, Peak - 30 min Skyway, Rainier Beach, Downtown Seattle Tunnel Off- 60 min 107 Renton Highlands, Renton-Boeing, Downtown Peak - 30 min Renton, Bryn Mawr,Rainier Beach, Downtown Off - 60 min Seattle Tunnel 111 Lake McDonald, Renton Highlands Park & Ride, Peak only Kennydale, Newport Hills Park & Ride, 35 minutes Downtown Seattle • 114 Renton Highlands, Lake Boren, Newport Hills, Peak only Downtown Seattle 30 minutes 147 Lake Kathleen, East Renton, South Renton Park Peak- 30 min & Ride, Downtown Seattle Off- 60 min Source: METRO,TDA Inc. East Renton Interceptor Project Transportation Draft EIS 92 November, 1991 Nue June 7, 1993 Renton City Council Minutes Pane 266 Citizen Comment: Herald James Herald, 3701 NE 10th Court, Renton 98056, stated that their single - Group Home, family residential area is not the proper location for a commercial Brentwood, NE 10th Ct business. He noted that no construction or remodeling signs have been posted and the neighborhood residents want to know what has been planned for the house. Mayor Clymer stated that staff will review the issue. Councilman Stredicke noted a memorandum from staff stated that no building permits for a remodeling project on NE 10th Court have been issued. He stated that this property is located over three blocks from a bus line and questioned whether there are state or federal requirements that mandate the location of convalescent or group homes relative to bus lines and other services. Citizen Comment Todd Woosley, Burnstead Corporation, 1215 - 120th Avenue NE, Suite Woosley - Comprehensive 201, Bellevue 98005, requested that the site plan review requirement be Plan, General removed from the planned neighborhood residential (PNR) zone. Citizen Comment: Roger Blaylock, 855 - 106th Avenue NE, Bellevue 98004, expressed Blaylock - gratitude to Council for consideration and review of the Parker property, Comprehensive Plan, and requested that the issue be reviewed by the Planning & Development General Committee within the next two or three weeks. Citizen Comment: Vaupel Versie Vaupel, P. O. Box 755, Renton 98057, requested clarification from - Comprehensive Plan, the Administration in writing whether the appeal period for the North General Renton area will begin today or the date of the Planning & Development Committee review. Ms. Vaupel also questioned why zoning for N. 2nd Street was changed to arterial commercial (CA). Citizen Comment: Wallace Allen Wallace, 701 Fifth Avenue, Seattle, representing Jack and Mardell - Urban Growth Morrison owners of 40 acres located adjacent to SE I28th Street, Boundary, SE 128th St requested that Council recommend to King County that the south one- third of the R-3 area be included in the urban growth boundary area. Mr. Wallace stated that this portion is located within the Maplewood Creek Basin in the Maplewood Creek aquifer. MOVED BY EDWARDS, SECONDED BY STREDICKE, REFER THIS ISSUE TO THE COMMITTEE OF THE WHOLE. CARRIED. Citizen Comment: Tibbott Dean Tibbott, 17003 NE 28th Place, Bellevue, stated that the site plan - Comprehensive Plan, review process is too long and involved, and that timing is important to General developing a good project. ADJOURNMENT MOVED BY STREDICKE, SECONDED BY TANNER, COUNCIL ADJOURN. CARRIED. Time 11:35 p.m. CINDY L. NDERSON, Deputy City Clerk 6/7/93 Recorder: Cindy Kartes I 4,040 June 7, 1993Renton City Council Minutes Page 262 Planning & Development Referred 5/24/93 - Planning and Development Committee Chairman Committee Stredicke presented a report stating that the subdivision application Planning: Urban Growth known as "Whitegate" located along May Valley Road and Coal Creek Area, Halinen Parkway, is pending before King County. The Administration and Council have been consistent in their discussions and correspondence with King County over the past two years regarding the development of this project and the designation of the urban growth boundary. On April 5, 1993, the City Council passed Resolution 2960 identifying an urban growth boundary jointly delineated by the City of Renton and King County including this area within the City's urban growth area, and designating it as an urban separator. The Planning and Development Committee reaffirmed the actions approved by the Council in Resolution 2960. The Committee recommended that the Mayor send a letter to Tim Hill, King County Executive, reiterating the agreement spelled out in the Resolution, emphasizing the City's position that any development approved for this area having a density greater than one dwelling unit per ten acres will be required to connect to a sewer system and will not be allowed to develop utilizing septic tanks. MOVED BY STREDICKE, SECONDED BY MATHEWS, COUNCIL CONCUR IN THE COMMITTEE REPORT. CARRIED. Finance: 1994 Budget Councilman Stredicke noted that there is a need for a second code compliance officer in the City, and as budgets are reviewed this type of position should take precedence over the addition of other new full-time staff positions. ORDINANCES AND RESOLUTIONS The following ordinances were presented for second reading and adoption: Comprehensive Plan: An ordinance was read amending Chapter 31, Zoning Code, of City Code Zoning Code and by amending sections 4-31-2, 4-31-3, 4-31-4, 4-31-5, 4-31-6, 4-31-7, Designations 4-31-8, 4-31-9, 4-31-10, 4-31-11, 4-31-12, 4-31-13, 4-31-14, 4-31-15, 4-31-16, 4-31-19, 4-31-23, 4-31-25, 4-31-30, 4-31-33, 4-31-35, 4-31- 36, and 4-31-37 by amending the language thereof and creating new zoning designations and permitted uses thereunder. MOVED BY EDWARDS, SECONDED BY MATHEWS, COUNCIL ADOPT THE ORDINANCE AND SUMMARY AS PRESENTED.** Councilwoman Mathews questioned why small-scaled day care is listed as both a primary and accessory use in the single-family zones. After Council discussion it was MOVED BY MATHEWS, SECONDED BY EDWARDS, AMEND MOTION TO REMOVE SMALL-SCALED DAY CARE FACILITIES FROM THE PRIMARY USE AND LEAVE IT AS AN ACCESSORY USE IN SINGLE FAMILY ZONES. CARRIED. **ROLL CALL: 5 AYES: EDWARDS, SCHLITZER, MATHEWS, NELSON, STREDICKE. 1 NAY: TANNER. ORIGINAL MOTION AS AMENDED CARRIED. Councilman Tanner expressed concurrence with the majority of the Comprehensive Plan, but opposition to the urban center designation for *sr, LSD 43 COMMITTEE REPORT / a l.o✓ PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT COMMITTEE COMMITTEE REPORT JUNE 7, 1993 REVIEW OF NC-3 TECHNICAL REVIEW AREA (URBAN GROWTH AREA) TO RESOLVE SEWER ISSUES FOR PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT. (Referred 5/24/93) A subdivision application, known as "Whitegate," is pending before King County. The City Administration and Council has been consistent in its discussions and correspondence with King County over the past two years regarding the development of this project and the designation of the urban growth boundary. On April 5, 1993, the City Council passed Resolution 2960, identifying an urban growth boundary jointly delineated by the City of Renton and King County, including this area within the City's urban growth area and designating it as an urban separator. The Planning and Development Committee reaffirms the actions approved by the Council in Resolution 2960. The Committee recommends that the Mayor send a letter to Tim Hill, King County Executive, reiterating the agreement spelled out in the 'resolution and emphasizing the City's position that any development approved for this area which has a density greater than one (1) dwelling unit per ten (10) acres be required to connect to a sewer system, i.e. not be allowed to develop utilizing septic systems. Richard Stredicke, Chair Nancy Mews Timothy J./ hl4er cc: Lynn Guttmann Kay Shoudy May 24. 1993 Renton City Council Minutes Page 243 CORRESPONDENCE Correspondence was received from Versie Vaupel, P. O. Box 755, Renton Citizen Comment: 98057, expressing dissatisfaction with the proposal for a 10-foot buffer Vaupel - between the single family and commercial areas located south of North Comprehensive Plan, 2nd, and requested a mixed residential (MR) zoning designation. Central/West Hill Citizen Comment: Correspondence was received from Gloria Swartzwelder, 12317 SE 96th Swartzwelder - Place, Renton 98056, requesting that the SF/4 mix zoning designation be Comprehensive Plan, maintained for Williams Avenue N., between N. 4th Street and N. 5th Central/West Hill Street. Citizen Comment: Correspondence was received from David Halinen, Halinen & Vander Halinen - Comprehensive Wel, P.S., 800 Bellevue Way NE, Suite 376, Bellevue 98004, representing Plan, East Renton Stoneway Concrete and AnMarCo, requesting an office/residential Comprehensive Plan designation and a POR-1 zoning classification for the area along Maple Valley Highway across from the Stoneway plant site. Citizen Comment: Correspondence was received from David Halinen, Halinen & Vander Halinen - Comprehensive Wel, P.S., 800 Bellevue Way NE, Suite 376, Bellevue 98004, requesting Plan, General that a 40% slope line be used as the official dividing line between the resource conservation areas and other abutting zoning districts. Citizen Comment: Phillip E. Gladfelter, Corporate Real Property Manager PACCAR Inc., Gladfelter - P.O. Box 1518, Bellevue 98009, requested that administrative or Comprehensive Plan, headquarter offices be permitted as a primary use under the industrial- Central/West Hill heavy (IH) zoning designation. Citizen Comment: Correspondence was received from J. Roderik Stephens, Anderson, Stephens - Jackson & Stephens, P.S., Attorneys at Law, 111 Williams Avenue S., Comprehensive Plan, Renton 98057, requesting clarification of the appeal process for the General environmental impact statement on the Comprehensive Plan. Citizen Comment: Wilson Correspondence from Harry C. Wilson, Wilson and Reardon Attorneys at - Comprehensive Plan, Law, 1117 NE Second, Bellevue 98004, representing Craig Taylor Valley Equipment Company, requested reconsideration of proposed arterial commercial (CA) zoning for the property located at 3100 East Valley Highway since it would make the present use non-conforming. MOVED BY EDWARDS, SECONDED BY KEOLKER-WHEELER, ALL CORRESPONDENCE REGARDING THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN BE REFERRED TO THE OFFICIAL FILE. CARRIED. Citizen Comment: Correspondence was received from David Halinen, Halinen & Vander Halinen - Urban Growth Wel, P.S., 800 Bellevue Way NE, Suite 376, Bellevue 98004, representing Area Chaffey Corporation, requesting that the NC-3 technical review area located along May Valley Road and Coal Creek (urban growth area) be referred to the Planning & Development Committee to resolve sewer issues for proposed development. MOVED BY MATHEWS, SECONDED BY KEOLKER-WHEELER, REFER THIS CORRESPONDENCE TO THE PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT COMMITTEE. CARRIED. Nue • Law Offices 'toe HALINEN & VANDER WEL, P.S. A Professional Service Corporation Bellevue Place/MGM Building (206)454-8272 DAVID L. HALINEN, P.E. 800 Bellevue Way NE, Suite 376 Fax(206)646-2851 Bellevue, Washington 98004 May 20, 1993 < s)V HAND-DELIVERED Renton City Council 200 Mill Avenue South Renton, Washington 98033 Re: Request that the Renton City Council's Resolution Concerning the NC-3 Technical Review Area (Urban Growth Area) Be Referred to the Planning and Development Committee for Reconsideration Dear Council Members: On behalf of my client, Chaffey Corporation, I hereby request that you refer to the Council's Planning and Development Committee for reconsideration your recent resolution concerning designation of the NC-3 Technical Review Area as an Urban Separator. My client has a vested King County subdivision application for subdivision of a 124-acre parcel within the NC-3 area into 124 sewered residential lots with 50 percent permanent open space. We are concerned that without a modification of your recent resolution to specify a straight "Urban" designation of the 50 percent portion of the parcel that is to be developed, Chaffey might be forced into developing the parcel into approximately 95 lots on septic drainfield systems. (A straight Urban designation would assure sewer service under the Countywide Planning Policies while an Urban Separator designation leaves sewer service less certain. ) Because the Growth Management Planning council is scheduled to take up designation of the NC-3 area at its June 16, 1993 meeting, for reconsideration to be meaningful Chaffey requests that this matter be taken up at the scheduled May 26, 1993 meeting or at a special meeting on the first Wednesday of June so that a report to the full Council would be possible by the June 7 , 1993 Council meeting. (Because Planning Director Kay Shoudy, who has been the lead staff person considering this matter, is apparently on vacation through the Memorial Day holiday, a special meeting on the first Wednesday of June may be more appropriate so that she might be available to participate. ) Thank you for your consideration of this request. Chaffey's representatives and I look forward to the possibility of meeting lbw Iwo Renton City Council May 20, 1993 Page 2 with the Planning and Development Committee to discuss the NC-3 area further. Sincerely, HALINEN & VANDER WEL, P. S. 214. df4itc. David L. Halinen cc: Herbert Chaffey, CEO Chaffey Corporation c:\cf\2003\003\rcouncil.It1 LAW OFFICES CAIRNCROSS & HEMPELMANN A PROFESSIONAL SERVICE CORPORATION 7OTH FLOOR,COLUMBIA CENTER,701 FIFTH AVENUE SEATTLE,WASHINGTON 98104-7016 (206)587-0700 TELEX:493-8803 JOHN W HEMPELMANN FAX:(206)587-2308 May 27, 1993 Honorable Bob Edwards Renton City Council 500 Mill Avenue South Renton, Washington 98055 Re: R-3 Renton Technical Study Area Dear Councilmember Edwards : We are requesting the Renton City Council to consider fine- tuning its recommendation on the Renton Technical Study Areas, which you will see from the attached letter. I would appreciate your support for having the City Council consider our request at its June 7 Committee of the Whole meeting. 41k uly yours, A J. n W. Hempel nn JWH/bank d0.40498 40498 d08 k...///j Enclosure LAW OFFICES • CAIRNCROSS & HEMPELMANN A PROFESSIONAL SERVICE CORPORATION 70TH FLOOR,COLUMBIA CENTER,701 FIFTH AVENUE SEATTLE,WASHINGTON 98104-7016 (206)587-0700 TELEX:493-8803 FAX:(206)387.2308 May 18, 1993 Craig Larsen Assistant Director Parks, Planning and Resources Department King County 1108 Smith Tower 506 Second Avenue Seattle, Washington 98104 Jim Reid Manager Lisa Madjiak GMA Supervisor Tom Koney GMA Planner Planning and Community Development Division 707 Smith Tower 506 Second Avenue Seattle, Washington 98104 Re: R-3 Renton Technical Study Area Dear Ms. Madjiak and Messrs. Larsen, Reid and Koney: We are land use counsel for Jack and Mardell Morrison, who own a forty acre parcel at the south end of the R-3 Renton Technical Study Area. We urge you to recommend retaining the urban growth area designation for the Morrison property and adjoining properties that generally fall outside the May Creek Basin. Craig Larsen Jim Reid Lisa Madjiak Tom Koney May 18, 1993 Page 2 The Morrison property forms the exact northeast border of the Maplewood Creek Basin, as recently defined by the City of Renton's East Renton Sewer Interceptor EIS. (See Attachment A). Accordingly, a key rationale for redesignating the R-3 area from urban to rural, to protect May Creek from the impacts of urban development, does not apply to the south end of the R-3 area, which is in the Maplewood Creek Basin. A second key point is that on March 8, 1993 the Renton City Council chose to build the East Renton sewer interceptor in the SE 128th Street right-of-way. (This street is called NE 4th inside Renton.) SE 128th Street forms the south boundary of the R-3 area. The sewer interceptor will extend eastward within the right-of-way of this four lane arterial road until reaching the east boundary of the current City limits. Renton is oversizing the sewer interceptor in anticipation of further eastward extension along the SE 128th Street corridor to provide sewer service to the East Maplewood Creek Basin area, as identified in the sewer interceptor EIS. The Morrison property directly abuts the SE 128th Street sewer interceptor corridor. The rationale noted at the April 28 workshop, that the expansion of services to urban levels would not be feasible for the R-3 area, really applies only to the majority of the R-3 area that is located outside the Maplewood Creek Basin. This larger R-3 area, due to hilly terrain and slopes generally falling to the north toward May Creek, cannot access the SE 128th Street sewer interceptor by gravity flow. In contrast, the Morrison property and the several adjoining R-3 area properties that are within the Maplewood Creek Basin can access the new sewer interceptor by gravity flow. The City of Renton is completing the final design and permitting for the SE 128th Street sewer interceptor and is scheduled to start construction this September. A relatively short connection to this new sewer line will ensure provision of the full range of urban services to the Morrison property, which is already serviced by an urban arterial road, a METRO transit route, a public water system, and nearby public schools. Accordingly, we propose that King County retain the Morrison property and other R-3 area properties located in the Maplewood Creek Basin within the King County urban growth boundary. (See Attachment B, map depicting R-3 area properties within Maplewood Creek Basin). Remaining R-3 area parcels located in the May Creek Basin could be designated rural, consistent with the preliminary staff recommendation. One exception to the northward rural designation could be Apollo Elementary school, which is located immediately northwest of the Morrison property and already receives sewer service from the City of Renton. We now proceed to provide greater detail concerning our proposal. kikwy Craig Larsen Jim Reid Lisa Madj iak Tom Koney May 18, 1993 Page 3 1. Property within our proposal for a modified R-3 urban growth area is located in the Maplewood Creek Basin as defined by Renton's sewer interceptor EIS. ► Renton set the EIS study area boundary according to drainage basins. The City's objective was to include properties that would allow for a gravity flow of sewage to the sewer interceptor. (David Christensen, Renton Public Works). ► The Morrison property forms the northwest corner of the East Maplewood Basin. (DEIS Figure 3; See Attachment B). ► "The entire study area is outside the boundaries of the May Creek Basin." (FEIS p. 167; See Attachment C). ► Properties to the north and to the east of the Morrison property generally drain to the north and east into the May Creek Basin. ► The rationale for designating the R-3 area for rural use to protect May Creek from urban development does not apply to the Morrison property and other R-3 properties that are in the Maplewood Creek Basin. 2. The Renton City Council decided on March 8, 1993 to extend sanitary sewer service to the East Renton area via the SE 128th Street corridor. ► The City Council selected the West Maplewood interceptor alternative route, which will extend a new sewer interceptor eastward along the SE 128th Street corridor to Renton's current east boundary. Renton anticipates starting construction of the sewer interceptor this fall. (See March 8 Council minutes and DEIS Figure 6, Attachments D and E). ► The East Renton Sewer interceptor will be oversized, allowing for future eastward extension of sewer service to the large portion of the East Maplewood Basin that lies east of Renton's current city limits. The Morrison property is located at the northeast corner of the East Maplewood Basin. ,0, "" Craig Larsen Jim Reid Lisa Madjiak Tom Koney May 18, 1993 Page 4 ► The future eastward extension of the East Renton sewer interceptor along the SE 128th Street corridor provides an opportunity for further extending sewer service to Liberty High School, which currently disposes its sewage each day by truck. 3. Existing and future development reliant upon septic tanks in the East Maplewood Basin imperils Renton's domestic water supply. ► Renton relies entirely on ground water for its water supply, and will increasingly rely upon the Maplewood Basin aquifer as its water source. (DEIS p. 42; See Attachment F). ► "It has become clear that existing and future septic systems within the study area threat to the City's water supply." (DEIS pp. 1 and 83; FEIS p. 67; See Attachments G and H). ► "The East Renton Interceptor would address the water quality threat from over 1,000 existing septic systems" (FEIS p. 163; See Attachment I), as well as assure that additional development does not add new septic systems polluting Renton's water supply. 4. SE 128th Street, which the Morrison property directly adjoins, is a four lane, concrete urban arterial road. ► METRO Transit bus route No. 111 runs along SE 128th Street and provides service to Downtown Seattle. (DEIS pp. 92, 93; See Attachment J). ► The Morrison property is already directly served by urban level roads and transit service. 5. Retaining the existing urban designation of the Morrison property (and other R-3 area properties located in the Maplewood Creek Basin) is consistent with Countywide Planning Policy LU-14, which establishes criteria for the designation of the Urban Growth Area: Policy LU-14. The lands within the Urban Growth Area (UGA) shall be characterized by urban development. The UGA shall accommodate at least the 20-year projection of we wrr* Craig Larsen Jim Reid Lisa Madjiak Tom Koney May 18, 1993 Page 5 population and employment growth with a full range of urban services. The Countywide Planning Policies shall establish the urban Growth Area based on the following criteria: a. Include all lands within existing cities, including cities in the rural area and their designated expansion areas; b. The GMPC recognizes that the Bear Creek Master Plan Developments (MPDs) are subject to an ongoing review process under the adopted Bear Creek Community Plan and recognizes these properties as urban under these Countywide Planning Policies. If the applications necessary to implement the MPDs are denied by King County or not pursued by the application(s), than the property subject to the MPD shall be designated rural pursuant to the Bear Creek Community Plan. Nothing in these Planning Policies shall limit the continued review and implementation through existing applications, capital improvements appropriations or other approvals of those two MPDs as new communities under the Growth Management Act. c. Not include rural land or unincorporated agricultural, or forestry lands designated through the Countywide Planning Policies plan process; Comment: There are no designated agricultural or forestry lands in the R-3 area. d. Include only areas already characterized by urban development which can be efficiently and cost effectively served by roads, water, sanitary sewer and storm drainage, schools and other urban services within the next 20 years. Comment: The smaller portion of the R-3 area that abuts SE 128th Street and is located the Maplewood Creek Basin already has urban roads, transit, water and schools services. Other urban services, particularly urban sanitary sewer service, can efficiently and cost effectively be provided by the City of Renton within the next 20 years, as we previously discuss in this letter. The existing land use pattern of adjacent land uses to the east and west along SE 128th Street is suburban in character. e. Do not extend beyond natural boundaries, such as watersheds, which impede provision of urban services. `, Nome Craig Larsen Jim Reid Lisa Madjiak Tom Koney May 18, 1993 Page 6 Comment: Our proposal to retain the urban designation of those R-3 area properties which are located within the Maplewood Creek Basin properly respects the natural watershed boundary between Maplewood and May Creeks. .f. Respect topographical features which form a natural edge such as rivers and ridge lines; and Comment: The Morrison property, although not at a sharp ridge line, does approximate the topographic northeast crest of the Maplewood Creek Basin. Properties to the north and east generally slope down to the north and northeast to the May Creek Valley. g. Include only areas which are sufficiently free of environmental constraints to be able to support urban growth without major environmental impacts unless such areas are designated as an urban separator by interlocal agreement between jurisdictions. Comment: Additional urban development would not cause significant environmental degradation as both King County's and the City of Renton's development regulation and critical area ordinances will protect any environmentally sensitive areas that may be present. 6. Retaining the existing urban designation of the Morrison property (and other R-3 area properties located in the Maplewood Creek Basin) is also consistent with Countywide Planning Policy LU-8 which speaks directly to the question of whether use of septic systems is advisable for a particular area: Policy LU-8. Designated rural areas shall have low densities which can be sustained by minimal infrastructure improvements, such as septic systems and rural roads, without degrading the environment or creating the necessity for urban level of services. Comment: Existing septic systems are degrading the Maplewood Creek aquifer, adversely impacting the City of Renton's potable water supply, and violating State groundwater quality standards. Existing development in the Maplewood Creek Basin cannot be sustained by septic systems without degrading the environment. As a result, the City of Renton is oversizing the SE 128th sewer interceptor to accommodate future . rr wr` Craig Larsen Jim Reid Lisa Madjiak Tom Koney May 18, 1993 Page 7 eastward extension which will facilitate converting numerous existing residences from septic systems to sanitary sewer. Changing the designation of the Morrison property from urban to rural area will require adding septic tanks to a basin where Renton is currently focusing great effort to eliminate the environmental problems that septic systems pose, and would be inconsistent with Countywide Planning Policy LU-8. In summary, we believe that our proposal to retain the urban designation of the Morrison property and adjoining properties that are also located in the Maplewood Creek Basin directly advances the mandate of the Countywide Planning Policies. The preliminary rationale for redesignating the R-3 area may fit the larger R-3 area, but simply does not fit the facts of the R-3 area's south end. A rural designation would be contrary to the public interest in protecting the aquifer underlying the Maplewood Creek Basin. We appreciate your consideration of our request. io.: truly your , Ark tiki deta.f,1- . J. W. Hempe ann / /il. / 01 /ff6/ Alan L. Wallace Enclosure cc: The Honorable Cynthia Sullivan King County Council GMPC Chairperson Kay Shoudy Planning Manager City of Renton Jack & Mardell Morrison toe Craig Larsen Jim Reid Lisa Madjiak Tom Koney May 18, 1993 Page 9 bcc: Gordy Morrison Hugh Goldsmith 206608.D12 EAST RENTON '' t; ` ' INTERCEPTOR ',. • ..i:. ;p ti_ 'FIG. 3 ...:•;,:,.m, \. %....s NE)... rp •re/fro Alternative 1 Z ;Z yE 8tr,- Maplewood Heights i _Ft Interceptor >.j BOEING H W: .- � 1 rN 8th ST �"� _- fh . � • N 6th ST I • i f i �I x l r i r-1 `z 1 �tv, FLEW li 1>I I °wgASTbi:i. _` fl OOD 1 _it I.! �. ASS - 0 J L__ i____—_`N 5th ST • °• /; / J s • Y ../' 1 t I •2. .! I..J L ;_ 4th ST1 s N l� t L.: J( 1 3td ST < I i, r -s. 1 • h i r- 3 NI NI 1 sou j GHLA I r x ir o Sl f; ' :t ,.4. ..!:.. .1 NORTF , W < �I .. . y .. BAST I I _� ll � � W < _ ... .; N.r�> 'jet ms,i•"xx� i} ♦ C.7 l+_ nia. .��. . i r � r . I 2nd ST Jlfa t fiira t fr.{11N r. .�. ��� y/ -�/jam// ! '.1,'*'?F :.. =£ irit Ea•14,r =.1jm • :i ' zi . t . 91 i ,, . N t \ \ � � Ir:� SE170MR � /J CL' 7 r-- v Ea • N. I i I 11 SE i leMt t t • r • �\. 1 C ii..........; f----1(-.n i 1 ��—i t=bd . --- g i II -IA gt1-_.-1! 'L.-----r—ii I .,.c.•----7, 22t - - - - t I 0 500 1000 2000 Z \ i SCALE IN FEET bill, IL IL 4116 Attachment A RENTON AND ISSAQU4P __ am TECHNICAL REVIEW 'REAS N-1�K " 17` AS DESIGNATED BY THE i �� — - KING COUNTY on a 111111/'=j iiiing1PItiiiimi GROWTH MANAGEMENT Ill■►[t,`2u■ ISSA- 11�111 ��11�PLANNING COUNCILlum!. A1iiiiii auAH EMI M i.Fig,9411 ILL 1 URBAN 11T1 ,W • .. .. .. GM PC Currently Designated Urban . : ,IVTechnical Review Areas: �,,/ NC-3, R-2, R-3, NC-1 EE RURAL GIt1PC Currently Designated Rural 11 Technical Review Area: R-1 - — Tectnicd Review Area ilP kjp Ott im. yaws j j j�: G 1PC UGA ine ;limns' 11 4 11i1,I1 II1 ::1v;',. Urban Separator 11i ' i i i I ' I Pcrcels — — I / I:j1 7i7.1' #.0010 1 u ;1,!;;; Sibdvisions (contain smiler prcels) 1 KingCount _i_�,� 1 — Tfl Planning and Community Development Division 111111 Geographic Information System -- — I.*rlIlic October 07, 1992 nT- , •,'1 I. This .ep Is 1.1end.d ter plu.L� pr es,a •nip I ' I I I Ale ud is .,I p.srulccd Ia skier eccvsie meas.rsm,sls. tsiMul,s sal ba Isc,s Iete sad ers 11e lest I I 1 4.1411111 �' �p ,, nailahle II Mill, nr►s.t tine. ' /7 i * I I: i This eep sal Were parcels �� . ,., split far phonily psrpeses. ` 14/ Sired right et rep is eel stirs. =— i . Til 0 MO 2000 7000 5000 ^T r- \ ,alli � 1 i , . ' V ..-- MI I ; I �, % i i.FM I I i :s_e ,1 l 1 Attachment B *Me v Qt�.= uc YcEUt V ' ? 9 C YE v 7 x x ,ho4 I= E 2.2 3 O p ee G s' p-� � a = 0oa5� : o ,. .au c S 43 > W 9 e ~ 3 .. YN•So .Ee4 4 Y , p . a - 7 a .5 � 2 .1 �G �• •. E C V C Y H ..0 A Y C u .n 0 u C>.�' C 0. l^ rO .g Y . A N V 5. a E p U 3 V ..Y Y ,L� u q • w .2 u e v S o f 3 {LU .Ci 2 w ..1 ..m:1 fw �' 4egE$ c 5 a5 a Y 2 r� as >.e N c Y e t 3 3 44 sma. .4 ~ Y a 0 3 ey. = .• 0. v 3 U 9 s '�! u`poL _ Y xt eIce=in a cg .a o s �`--.0<a.g a AY.=N+u s :IQ . . 4 Y S eo »pC3, - • e10 - 0.0 m a- ag = 1• 9S ace ;`og3 aw eeiav'A 1 e• Ea »Go ggg .. s 1 Y p tl yw z` b fY a u 5 cr=3 » OG a CyQ`��' u`J' �a � e u Dw �T3 a .. $ W ° 9 -'4 3: $, 1 g Cm e0111 8 c i/ Z a C ; . 4 r O q . 7 4 Cc uou o41 e a u a F. a. x d- t (o T T T N A . Y✓ O O >. • 0.N C .11 M 4'V t7 .+''7 O C M 0I'U 4 N V $ V M O 0.4041C . q Y M.0 O M C.4' O1 V C 0.0 e . C... c C C O YC. e • f O.0. V M 0✓ V✓ A.4 4 .: 44. 000441.44. 04 .. AWAA 0.44.403014A00 .4./.1.40 V ✓ AY 13..'0A0C SU U NCv 0..+ Ao0.YC 4 > N . V ordM3O OOOX Y'tlqv.V' 4 q aC M >.0 C.-/ .-. -.-/ Y r'V p 0 4. C. .. ..4.40 VqAW : O0 VN✓ AA 3•1 WK C'OO.4CV O yCN... VV -. MRo > 3 > ✓ O+/ OMCAVW O✓ V✓3. ..r .Vq3o44 C✓ OY •0yC.r . Y . Y .4 /, c: V Y 4 K 46140 P M A 4 Cs ./ .0 3e Y7'1 > ✓✓ M O-40U4e0. M <W W" O ✓ M.-/ C M o g O C C o to ..-a C •'G . 0. ... O . � � r A 0 0 0 " Y N✓ N.0 C C U'd N'O,O I A 3q✓ o0 O., W0.A �✓ r w W ✓ O >. ./ ✓ OOO Cam~ lit, AA . C�+ >. [j q 4. C OF Ys. C o @ W.-� 'O .� V.4 C • Vo O 7.'Cr. yC'' q,.Ot•C 3q'C o ea Z 4+aJ As .j14 = Na✓ 'fl gyOj7✓ C •� >.M OKpA q� CCQ•C✓+✓yY " q . 0 m0.nZAw Y✓ •48 34 0.�'. C�+ 3ooa000 C Y ✓ q 'y O M O M q O O A 3 d C ✓'/ V >' Y.0 O g q 7 q o p A C q to A A 1. O > M-2110.0 . •d.["i 0.q %•.f'U :A Y 4✓ '! b ti� .-"i�+ V W 3 0 ,�.ag0.CGp • q� @ ►. 0.ri Z o'C3 • Mo•✓i�'�+ 0.0✓ CYY ✓ ACM•C - q 1. !.✓ C'� q . C W ✓C6 C Y p ✓ f,t.-01 O V C V V o V 0.M G V 01 y O 0.>~ O OM ✓ qo ..� 0C • ..- O4-4 ../ C V • CN�+ 'dY 7 = AC % C 3 ✓W..1 0 44 W V M Y O ✓ •✓ U q < ,....40,1,1 0 0 M N 9 .i .'4 O+1 0 4 O •+1 M {�W ,.may.0 O O M o.-/ C . .i.O ✓ Y q f. f+•y Y o•M V o. Q •y n O O Y 0 O...0.. V F Y " 8.0 U q W'.�U .yC`�.4 .'� ✓ q+�00 ✓ g y U q✓ q-you .,Y 0044 A o✓ C 0.4 >' .40 ✓ C •N O3oBo-✓iAo07.60 1C0• ✓ 07' q • Y3 • .0MAu,COWM0 r U41 @V3P0.i 2 4.-4 44 y A„ . .it. 3.W,1 w 0 3.4w q > q,4i .✓.G.0 " 7r o+1•'1 M o M p '� C 3 ?.> R U oo.oW A M ✓•-1 ✓ ✓ q „�+ O.q•.�..y 3 d a✓ =b q q " q✓ O q q O q'O O y.4 0 A q >,r G'g q O U N C CO q F.A✓ 0.CW > a0ea Oy.40 r-".�-/ 7.Aq q; A 00.° /,00 .i °'�yq. w.As.'4 +✓i✓.7r07 ✓'• gVAMCo b C A R o q o v'C AO Y a V •+.r: ✓ 4+E-.✓ ✓f.. 4% VO'�4+'4 a 414.1 M M s e ✓ O Y A MO U„ O >../0 M M U q C > C e A 4 q 'q c . W W V + y A 4+•4 V • V C ✓ • MO g3VM-.13g0.q XO .4...440 ✓.0 CO M WC0.p 4' MMygq'0 qM7 q0 :440 ✓ 0• ✓ 40 • . V40a- r++ O 'may " ...0 00 0.... 0 .C3q .. e = 0.g3= q�.-/ 0, M^t oU C mC9 > p. oq . dOC w • QMaf Oo •✓ 44 o .t✓ • 0 0 0 0 Y g 0 aC ✓ g L 3 1. V Y..... 0 0 . 2 . k.a a v • Av.�.-Oie q.Oi C.0040.C,Oy V e GN .4 .4.4 '' o " nCC0. � > .404.4 w q✓ e44 i. MM@++ qA ++ 0++ R O O V o >..Yi.R4.-. 0 W ✓ '1 > Y q.Oi q✓ 0 4348 m00140.4,04 7 W• O > q.0 ✓4 Y 0 A U„-,� 0 0.q C o g LG ..q 14,4 M 3 O q o•- +N • c M M 0 0 0 k >.y.0 n V q q p'V • C. • .] 0 3..4 O C .ti Y 3 0 7 01.� 0 > V) q 0.++ 0 y Y 0 • 32 N .,1 M < Ct'. 1414'C A O..i 443 "O "1"... q W 4 V .-. M y ✓✓.0 3 > q q M to .-/ F O0.�+ y.�� ✓✓ . oM 1 "�W++ p 0.'0 W� V V.+M '.tUOYM W .•i C.C • 4�< Z . O > ++ . . A C.4.0 0 e "1 4 0 8 , M > M C 3 Y 7C V C.0 0 = A C W ✓ O M C y = 0 M•C o W M 4+ r Y +1 C ✓^ .a 0 0 b ACM N ✓ q✓F' 3'0 Z . 0.0.0+1 O.H V✓ @ 0. Y 1i+ A 04) q W .. 03.+ C0q to 40.1 AM • Z 43130. q.+A.r. C - Y V . M 0 C 0 O.O • 24 ✓ M M 4-I 3. 1-/ +f.y AV! O W.-1 4 0 Y M 4.0 0 0 C 0✓ >,4 ✓ 0 C 0 M M C o C >..1 4A Y YAW..M 1A ..1 • • .•. CG M C.0 O M e C M Y 4 M . 0.00W 143 9 0 V M✓ N W W M..W.4 X M M 3 0 M'O W .-. Y.4✓.-1 0•.a V 3•.•1 0.F V C .. 34•1 . • .•4 f+ • C O 3.1+/ 3 C O•-1 W 4/ Y q 3 r+ > 00. q . . . 0 > OVN 3 .430.> o > • 00403 .. 03 , WC •M ✓ O++ MO ✓ 3 • Z .C301 >.V 3. Y . 0C.r.' C O 00 eCO'O.0 _.0 V.+.l0 M ?PW•.47A 1... 4 AgOM30F. co F .••�A M 0'U q Y . 3"'''V P.A.4 Y q✓ F A 0. q U q q q 0 . M • 0 Z 1.42C g W 3 ✓ 1. ii__L........1- ('' • • • \ a. ( WILLIAMS AV _%.__.-_/(_y,U1 (IAAIS AV N r o \ �� �_. l__.�\�L__�_ WELLS AV •� /_11..._..I _ _J; pus_A�l f: •. -:1 .� � o . `� - 1l405 -_.•�� \__�._ 1..1 � ���',+�I I PELLYI�AV N-lir 11 .: .:_ :.� n p _ f a PARK AV N 1 PARK AV N CEDAR AV S � \ ��\4,�.--`n -.--- � — ---- - --- o F _.__. ._� % .`\�: -' GARDEN AV N L i i N 2 RENTON AV S '\�: nv.��\ ll ' (w �I - - z m - -- �;�`4'� '< ..I[MEAOOW�l=' .AV^J• /s z N bv9 m I <\ r , 3 - �I:_ --_ i \v ,\ l=_1 FACTON•. , ,, .!tkainik.),,:,,.,t,:::„. RYFA-‘"TN_ j # 2. g f- N ri::r:"ilitig.1.-::„ L. ( I'I N /" i ... .k%1•1.'::___----_- ilF 7 • r1 �3wI ' 3V \� Q '. `, I( ���'.: ;JniAN ^ ' ri,• 4 , ix ' c3 aq . ; t. fl. [lJ1 --- - Ill1 �ty3l�. :xrydi/'h 41.P'�-i 'I 3. �:Y,QIIt :<' s /" / 'I • _ .Icy I '/1/\.‘ ,! '4 K3 hr.,h i. 'xkw. 3+ . S. . r• I S��c • hD , A �],_ ____ �_ i ` �48ERDEE ••�-�.� ' 4‘4:7 ' / •• 1'>�o=o,>!Fs,. • y h xt.., 3�yt' �.'�.. r_ l+zi��• I• I .. 1 .:. L..„:::.... . 1...2 2 ,..,.. ,.:„. J/! f 1 XCI)-I Z—I u � 1 '3 S R t, I m m1 i �� h. .... ,.,. ,,., 1, , , ,,,, .7,!,,t,,, ,,, ,, ,,,„: ;,:::. •.• ( • .. ,, I �: y i ys h CAMAS AV�s.:7:,;::::::::::. :,.:;:.•'''.:?ii:I:'ii i:::II • i. m ,< t�nSS C ,_ alb . l' 7l 1 _— In L/ • Y� • ,'k..' -2 ' Itil {�)) .•',. I /( %�i r)rn C0 f 03 33 11 1 A > r o `12<st. <eg..' h;qvi -ttp T. I L-_ /{17(xi.' t IV P -i C < 1 ,l , • Z- -4 i t Z3 I» S r I r__tom r Z fA .:.� I "1t� ?� _ HARRINGT N AV �. ,^ ,±..,A < 33 .., a) 1 „! • z n . m rn I A ' .• 3 • s ye!n �, ' ii mm 1 , ► . �` �._� 1 IIT:ITTIr 1 y v ' Almgypikili ir r { .� - m I ./ .. �„ ►� 0����®�� :� Ii 1C�i �Z i . ► � � Z : � - > ► $ili � m ' 1 ,,•;�I ,1 /' - •�; :. 1 ' m ' : ' ... F �►"1'�. `_7._- -.3 s I --:.-__:._I Z --_ �_ r a (� N _: Z O Ih ' 1 ` t • • m , .• C,.— ;1� /. boa i o .,, ,� le4 J �.7Q' • �`7Y ,K�hK , h • '�; / � L- V' I I • N �� � � I: 1 i r .l.r N Wr�.s. I.f�11� \1 ��� .' - 1. J K '3l'33 3�' ?� •��re, l'_�`( C7 • • .awe:w+ 1 A „) SJ,d,; Y ,y F r. .�:/;►� UNION AV SE m/® .�a. 3 . ., 1',ILay.Ia: `-- 1— -• - - - - -' . al .- 3.rA - • _ ' .��.. .: B-• dos-s c.�• •-ease;, ..- — 1 , i ..f;', 'V 1/ 11 `V I/ 1 „ I`. . 1 far gar -II► �Ir4 CI • \ . i I -. t....+i� l , L. y "A'�, . IN. Alf SE I J 1'.— P Q , I r 1 ` AA I i ti jUi i 1 1 jir--/ ! r . 1 .1---- - 1 �' �2M Alf SEA' I42nE Alf SE 2. (I //// 'I 1 I 1 r.� I I`ll . I > r ' --�i U • IHIAAESE 14 1� CO° I / l >a >m> I L �J fliS 'i 2p�-i 1 ` I C I—_J 4 I 'a 8 1 I ) v I tra1 1 ( -W Ctt c -- .. - _ Iwlr,AK Si L �1„' I * Z �j i 1 UYIA R. , i 1 aEitillI! " � M ' _ , r1• Qom � Z r I I w -' O I 0 Data Op I L .� 1r. xi z rr ' tri -- - ,, ...... .....i f AV N I •s\N•' '': -V.--.'.. I-1 Li WELLS AV 42••:".••• / /11/1 //' 11 WELLS AVI 1..._ i ‘'-'s • --.IL ;'• ii ,.-.... _. . -- o , i ,./.• * /--.,r -71; ------'1 N,tr/ li I 1-405 t4.:::::)k -1 iv, ./7,,,•z .I LLT.I.,1,...J LIY N...J,..._ ‘ ._.11..2.`,• .. ...c., -.....,,...- ., 1- -4 •-:' 1 i 1 ; PARK AV N (A r"...-11 —I 1-- 11?'-'' Nk\--- I-7\7A 2. FT'ARIc ...UV N 1:, ._j i . i 8 8 , __ „ ____,L_ ,,...... __N ,..\ j/.:,••. --____.......1,...— .......... ..........,\ 4 I.% .', \\ • . ' ,....4.4444.4.44 ler , . .. 233 r• 1 CEDAR AV S II\\ . / / \\t\\..\. 411L.GARDEN 1111..AV N.:,... I. . .. RENTON AV S•-......• \,\,.., cl o •.....--- z 2 8 1\ 'k. \ 'ow\ •\,Ig i —11v) 111 ut = • ...---::••••:,1.14 5 . II • ,N..i ..zz.....\..\xt1:1J,\\\\\ r_il r___14EADOW! .... AV Nt: 03 rn VI - ..' rn 11 ,.. .• -I "—'--.....'I ii s '..z.:.:''' \\ 1 1Z I!FACTORY,I AV N '• 4.= /// i '...s .:‘,.'7, • i • . F..---- , , ..„ : \ .,,,,,,,:•.. • , • „•%., .,..,, ...,.• -1, , . -..." --i.th 11 • N.) l. ai 0C) 0 / / ..' 1 , ;,,,,-rii„.4, ,••,;,,,,,o,r2kiii:1,4,. •4... .,. ''''*.• , ,r•Pr.`*' ', ... • . 1*1-.. c 4 I " / i/ ,,, , '7;3',•,-;',,,,,,,t,„,,,iypeoc,k,,,,,,..,,...,A;,;..,,,,..,...",,,, ,... ,.--„,,...,,,,„.Li.,.i „,,..7„,,Itii , :14.,,,:,z; ,,..„,„.,,,,.::::,„...-..,.,;;...41 ,......:-...,. .,„.......-,y/- ,.....0 , ,• , , , ., 1, 1 ..!i'.. f ,,,,..''''' i.fi'$-'',,,N4il' 5 .,-. 4,;{41'. •>,: ', •••‘ ti 1 /, ,lt:,0.1.40:p.., .,,i•., •,, .",14,,,,4,6,_ ,,„,,,,,,,1,01. „,,,,,,,, „, .- .••• ..- I / it) 1 '4 • //t...0 fitiftijlia••,. ' ,,ik .,714'., ''!:'iCiV 4 ..,i1,',. 0, ..'.'.':-.-----• ---- ..'" "' ,/./'•-•.;' / . ... . ..,Nzi:: ii,4,,,;...i.:.:,,, ,tr,•i,i' ,-t"' ' '''''''' ' 1 / • //,1,10•1 I I 1 ,//• - •11...i '', -'i!,',:,iltaiikit.k,,.,:qe i!.>141,,,,t,,,2. : .z.r.r....,... ,,,.1 ,.,.:2,...,, ,1: :,t : I I 1 I I . I I I I „ A . / . I '..'''. :Ai'.i.i .'i,-,....:::,';'Aii•i.,'.'2,ill'''''''''''..•.'"'',!4'''';'''J:',.E ' 1.'''r'. ;...'.!1'..: '! ::'. ---,..,..,. .47;:-.1„--1!,;(6/:,,ir,ir 1kBERDEEN,•, - , .„.. !di ...;:,iTii;p107.... ..,.,.....,y.,: ...ix ,-..,:.. :.„, ..„,,.,,,. •:,. . :,.....;_,_,-- , ," •‘.'\ . . •'' 0011 1 ' ' ?1.,.1k:',.4--'41Fg:':: ,,K4.,,,,,',t,.4 7.--,- --......c _.••'71,,,c. ,\,: ..,, ,,,,,,......„,14 ,1 ,-...:-. , ,,, ..,•;• . :, , . • " , i/h ,/ I:. ' ' i ' ,,.'.. .'.''''';,. ".,'"'. . ':',••1 ca z I°i',.7,,'''-:1. \,.!,:. .4.4N,,,-,..,-,41!:..g.11., ::•.,:::' ',• i• ,,,xi! ...,rn I \ ' I'' ; I I ihrtrR fir::14;11"4.$11h1?, >°-ri r-2- ,,.;'•'!),\' .1.04••... r: ";;;;••.',"•'7'.'•'... : I i...,— ...... . ' i j :/ -It f.)...11 ' --f ' .A.'JI I ", 1 I 1 1111whinii.T.,.., INA.3.•].-.•0)_......>....4 .:,'!.i,1%‘.. \.:.',.:'. ''.. -" ' ..' '-,•"-•••-- i ti ,,:-.4,, , PI ' ' ; ; ,...ji,-.-•-&-•. :1 -', 1, I, "'•;!:,„ 2±Z I;q: iii•,,,•1: i,•,:•,,,,,,,,,;,.. •,.: : '.•,' . .• `. i...,-T. 1/ ii '-tol,,,.., :!..: • S / . ! 11 ir'i!111111 1' 1 1 1,4h',111 ,ii..., „9 ,,.. ,i„..•:7....,,,,4,7••. , , „ ' - . ',111 1 'ili ;Ili ;'Jillin! .!...„,... -7:r.. .::':)".;:::. l,.*‘..,.. ;:41'.,.4;.!-.:',':'.)r.;,;': /7:;....:::•Vsti...-1/..cA!AAS AV 1 1 I I 1 i.44. ' . I i i 1 .1.:'1::•4'i:n.:4/..`‘.'...:7..,et;: i;.:1; :: ....e. ,,i. ' - L'. (,/...1/42) --; 1 v .•-•,„v, -0 0 al > Z s•- * ; ,'1,;•oit, 1 11,11y11111:,,, 11,,1 1,1 • 1 iiIii,t.,:,..,1 p•iiii ,i, i'i..:. :,••,,....; .. 1.•03,.,4.,,,,./•.,i,+, : ..,, i, ..t__. ..., • . iiiit,',41.1.1'):i' ' t II i, , 1'.,: ,1 t IF 1 1 i 'ql""•. ....".'1,'••• :1:?;••i ,' r •' '''‘,.:,',fe:r:I ''": ,'....;;.'...i.„.:' (..„. 1. .:-..2 f. ... -,.E.-. ;,-. _ ._-L:7, • - 1. '64 r; :15 74 > r-..4 :2 I- • - '11• -iv '1 ,11:114 1 • • , i: i ! fi ;11"1 i ,..i..! 01,1,1 ,ii ,,,'',!"* ._\: : :"!i,,,..,..:t•I,,,,,,;.. .. : r-.,I, 1 ,, 1 ,1", ,gli , , I . ,n!•1.......,....--±,!. ,• .q.,i,,••:. 1,0,,;:;.:: ,,,,,, I I'll m PI • 111 -'‹ ° m "•< i,"" i \\ • • ' ' II:I 111141 *H...ft 1.11 •I 11111111 .41,1. 1. ,I ill' I „ ,,,,,,,•.F1,, . A,,,,...J ,-.......• 1 . •1 •i'!,14 II'. ut,; 4 . !'11'11 1111 1111 IM .'a1..'. .:r :,.'4.•1'.•;':.;?•M';'f0' .;! .,1 rii"'•4? ././ !., 0 ,, , • iI 1 ' ;.• !Ill 1' 4 : I! 101111111 'ik 1111111111. .T.. 111'111'i' i 1' 1 1 i.1/\' '' F•i:.:.'''''"*.? '' .:'.i:•,:.•,••,:!, -1::;'.:., Cr...;;;.•,,,,s. /.,, 1 1 ';ce %lr.,....•., i f..• '."'-'''.'•:.<.••. ?.?':!: :r:,1•. .. :• '.--... i--- . " • / • I '41 1 '\ • 1111111 il , I 11 :1'11111:1,1111 1 111 m 0 0) 1111[1 111. Ili 1 lig; •••• PfH,•!:..:.: :,i. , •:. ••••,.):•f'.,: 0.'4.4., ..: • ., /"1 1 ill' ,! ..1 ,',.1111111 ccij 111 I I I MI - C. C '1 li 'ill ' .1 II ili 'i?.::",4;1F,0111 ::"i-•'.::A•?:1;;;;,! ,,.',.:••: ;• • 0. i i lirARRIN_GTON AV.;i''.. . ,,, ,......, vii I ; '' , 11, II : I Id ,•'11, il 1 (1)--i>--1 ill i ill, 11'1 if '';;.'i,:":4',,:,,'"" :!11.3: '(4., ..,,. ',-.6,,, ,,,...,.:4;-:•-•-!-.7., .• •-:,- -- :!. • -,; , .4'0 0 ' > "< ! • HI, 1 4. iii 1 ,i, z i 5 i „1.,! ,i 1„' v I.') .,',.., ,,:',",!.,..,,...,,.: ;:ii.;,,,,,,„,.,:• .,i.; !jf:.,.. ;Irn.,...,( .. .., . • < > r- i , ;! ! 011., 1 i rdi,i 111,',„! 1 'mill I I, !,,! ; ! 1! 'vs,,,-,:,,::,1'• ' •••• ,;;.; ••••,,,,;..„1-rp..------;---,Ii 1 '0; --', co-"i s• '''• .' 13,1i •,,iell ;j 0 ;1,111.11. ,. t• lt.'t litre! . " ":::":" .. ., 'lb • . 1, ••: , . 0 /Z ..cm , ; ,y,/ . ,. ! iii,1,1.di 1111H 1 14; 1!1,44 I 11 Ty10111111111),ill, 11 1,1 .!if i II I 1 •,..4;t4•1,:"'••:,...:" ?4f,,,, •• .;=.,„,,,.;„117.-.7`.• ',',-,-: WI,' \'.. '" „-•. , ,-, ,.•,:r , 1'iii.Ili i till'0,11 1 i pit 1 It!14,1 44141111;li I:,li 110 it , 111 I 11 11,.'•10•,,12:`7.::•,.>le'''''•• k,.:;:•;:: :',F.ri,,..,, • , '0;0 •.‘, . ;,"•.',.. ., I' ,,r. z 0 M " 1 I/ '''' ' : II..11j1: Ill•;!' ! 11 ' I '1 I ''1 1 i 11111;111'1 il il 11 11 :1;•' ' .' l•:Iii 'i b,i4,41!ire.,•'•'.''•::al.................. •:,,..n,.... \\'‘,kr.\,:.--1 -•- 1,.„11, ..l'it''hill 1 i:4•,‘ ai, ai .„6.. :(74N...,...'.....,,v,..1.,'.r.'..'.7101.-77'7:7\1•01-•,,,.. .,..,:1,‘,t ,,,,,_.: \,....._.....i......-1; 001 1-Lom. _NA-1_,../,'11•..:. ,,„, .A,,w,, _v'4,t,'"-4, • - :-. . - - \ ' ' '' • . . ..: ....'.1 '';:. ''..." ! , .:. : 11 1 1.. 11` . ' • TEIV.41i044‘W niF 4 '.-!'i'i;',A;;;',!i,1::::..:..,,' .:-A t, \ , II ..< . • ... ,.. ...--,_.,. ,:...• . . - • 1 / '.1 4. !" '''' • '. '- .''' ..t-. ''''; 1 1 iiiiiii i .,Iiii.-)74.40-+,..,+.4)4, .i.:iftiri:i-'.,::',, ,,,r ..- _ __.....;!:*!:. , .. :.:..: :...:.:i ,r r • .r.' .:-r--- - i 1. ...'t-':.:.:':7:,11.;:"::`;-t 7."7•17':-17 r''...::'.7'. •.77 .'•T'7.,'•7ir7: ::'r,''.,''.• • ..'.: '.ii).aV*,;*,Zgt;$410 iii.:4 A ili!,:'.il' I ., .• / :..,;,,::./• ) ' 'i'•:.,:;:. :i:..i".' '' ,:i,:„:::. • • : ....;:.: -:i. :::::i..i.,:ii•:.::,...: ... n..i.!.i EI 1 i! r / / ,11:•':-...••: 1 •••• \..i....•,.ii::,. •- ::::.:;:.!. >f .i•ii.•;• i •,..!;lA .'s,,ii:.z,-•;:. ....,:::: rnen :.....,:. 'f....,ittatAkilti4104041411.:1?•,q., 1.111;cre7. ,..;;,...i:1:,..,:::::1 r:..... 1 lir i if /1., /4.. , • ........:::.....• ,4,..... .. .., ..,,,,„;•. . •.• , ,,,:, . :: 03 :,.:"1 ,,:...::.' . . .., :..-1 ...;:.•...,1-. „......14.467,- di : II , /Ix:-..• ..,.:::::::::::::-dr::•:,..-•:•• : ••.•• N., ::;,.-..:'..- .....r- , ; .. ..;:,,,,... ,•:,:•., ::,,,,. kiv_.,„,wisarerrAmigi ., .. ,,,,,-,..:,.,.:,..F. ___ • ...0 . •; rn CD , I . / ,.... 40.,.:,..::. ... :. :.:•:. . •• :Sk,... .;:!;E:i.,:i , ..."M :.:: '...•• .,icfj tt'''''.. .. . ,.. ::: V;••V W,,IFFAIL,Nrillgilrg 1:14 1 ' '' '•';': :.•' -< D , ' •-‘• ' •y- • . .,... .. .4, ...".61 rn CD * C3 1 .// / /'./:*.....• . f ;: • . : orn :...N.I.S..1 ' 0 W.. .N... ,., . 0,, 0....,....4.2b-ireas_v,„$,A41.1 ;.•„.410,1/41',''.44.14.•!:%.k.i..,,..:;;;•::.!.,:':! ....',, 1....,.,; oz.), , ,,, ;.„.:.. ..:.:::•p,; i•••••••"::: .: . • ': CO 0- • ::.:•,•',N, 0 :,... , , . 1k.h.x.).N.,,:? 1,00-),..vf „0,44,401p.,elt,nr,1„. .4 lot,;(.. i,.,..;:,,: ,:. _.co • ./y i ...:.:. '.::•::: [,,''' '.• '•• : • .:: >.<..4 .,: . .....:1 . .,:::. ' ;:: :,,,77777!•••,.."`•*r'l. 4,0,6640:$ 407411; 4 ,• 4tf•AV .h• 11...„...,, „,;,,,...,„„,.,. i l .:CO..c • .:.: :...i' ' 7- • ......Z I ... . .. ::.:.:I: ': . :: . : H r. r.:.‘: • V. 0.41•WY.4-4"4 NiLii . . n.::. : ..,:,•,:*.(i,1.•,:,,.772 . • --..-.--• i woo • .., ,A , ....• z nam. ..,. i: . :l ',..:. ..... : 4fr,4,, ,4)A. 0,..,i,..,,,%4.4 140414'i,:0114:•,.. ..ii.i.:1...,, i,.,! 1,;. ,e;4; _/i(<6 ,, < 1 -:::.I: :. :.:.*::... :'::: :':'''. . '' .:7:1• '::" 'x. : ''• • 0,411°00.4V.44104Wly kt:1"s.„,...,P•;•., .''',”;•Pi".•'!"'. ,,10.;.a.0i4•?:,...veliol.4 111)tj:Y1/4 I f.... )••• •)TI ':''. . .: '•• ,;; '!"::rLT: # * 1••--;:\\ lhe i , 4)1,1 '-' ..''. , ' ...;'...tril.;: .'r.:i.:",•''''''F!1;i'':: .: i : . ''.:':1:: ' ,it 40. .,. • 40:,,, nk,••.. .,•,„,. ,„„:„.,,, „.. c.) . .0'.. ,1•:. '. .14 i t //A . c: 0 a:11(1 - .. .•j::::::. ,:r............. 6 4*116 46,-.i7 49.#4 :. , . .„,„,,,,, _... ::/.". : ''.::'...ftL.1. .. . ,: . :..."ia.ir,,,4,s01 .J.:;:::' likh__ •411646:.1,146-4.4644:418 . . .. /. 1,.• .‘.‘ „ /c r, .., -.:. m 1044 '3. '' : ' ::' : : 1 . . . ::':.:: :.; ':. ....:...H ri:,... ,:.:'';:::T''PO ilkikle4311...?17:11r1104.410 kabT•clar/f A...Z.41A13.;lii,':V....:..1q./a4F.444.4.404r4r4 .'-e i . // = ' ..... i.•'..,.:.....UNION:Aug .q.,:,,.,,,.:. .:...,.,,•:444LI.,',....L.2:2: _: .0.A.7%,..";47e#P.-....4,4,...ir-Iiikip.diot V',..• i' yr 'w 1-ls ..- --- .. - r-- . .:: Firis.,,....::::::..::!:,............. .:•::_... ..-.7.:....,,.......4-77 :.;:;.....:::::::::,....... ,.sfritg.874;04,......0„..--....„Sti.1 Iti , --iimr 'r .: ::11 ,:: .f.........:.:.:......,......:4_.::::::.-y-.--:-.--,,......k•Lni. "....:-...:- .:,:::::::..:. ,... .......,• tc.,--Rootaw,r- -, .4 40.41 :' 4,4i• 1.. , p_ t.,-- • I . :: :''... .:'.: . •:: ...:.:,idi2,..)... •.,..::,.::...1..:. :••,........-„.:,:::.,....::::::::::.47767474,.•4 ot: . . o .a. ra..&.440! 1. t::::::: :.f •...;:..1,.......:.:.:, ...:.E -:•...... - - ':":'.....:•:.::::::::.:-.:-.:'.',.:: : :...•....: *573 ....'.. . '''.'..-.'''''''''''' --""''''..'..•aitiFirAV,.441) _ i •••, 1.3 I / . . CI 41 :::11 . .: :...: :: ::.:•::. :•..::''.4....1.{.....:11:. 11..'::.'.':.•.: 1:• i.::.f: .:: ..::. ........;:..• ::::....::-'....;•:1 robW4iaeir*4/1 liall Cl 2 f c o ...f. V.-.1.\. .'.....:.::_4...-.::::.::::\.::.:iit.::: •',...,-„;. .. :. 0 ::.!:...::::: .v.::j;1„:. :: lar:j::•.;..::.:v...... . k x3 0 . .,..:' ••‘1";.!•\••••..,* IL, .,i: :..6 .... '.. • :.'•:::::. 17'..!s• i. .4..;',*/.;:.ii:.,•?. ''...•:::::.4iip 4,..•41t 40 4, , • i (\"\ , • • •...: 1 A )1"...a.„e -v • . • .....__, .............,_ ..„, . V.-......::: :-.... ..,,,•.'''''8:...e. [11 ] \\ : k......, •r.::".... .....,..:-:::::. j I IL , 1,-::::.... ..:•,•§,::::..........::::. ..... , f," , l• 4.14----- --.1-• -----•' !.. ,,, L.. V*?::: :... 1 l'Ai4 3E .... ---• i •••• : /% *41: . A ,,,,.._....,-,:•:::\-5.-----Lc ii,•-:::).. 'I i IIi r r- •••' 4/) . ....... ......... .... S t ii....... ....,4.14... ................r...t... ... ...J ii_rz,in • z 1 ,..) ii p-1:7-- ,i - ,r . i 4- . 1 % /1 i : .1. • 1 Li i I ':1---i 1 11.1 1, J 1411) I ) II 14101 Mt SE- I ... ,.., ,, ,, ...,1 142nd ME SE r li 1 11 ( Si 1 ----X•••-) ...; F•1 K > 1 14 .13 % L______Ar--- r' i!. 'I 14441 ME SE i. 1 •4 I ?(es&....... Z._ ...1,--------...-----1 r-----......... 1;14 .1 co r-m w>,m 0> ..„.._% N --,r i.- J ii 6 6(L__.... 1 L IT 1,1 II II , iii5 !lig 2 0-I ........ ..........Ii c _Thi E_. :, --c-i) --.1 - ---- Cilr. I IP 1t4 i , .......................................)1 i I 4 8 4 a. i ka . cr, ...:::-. L..................„„ii • I4....t II ..r -.... - ... K Z > —c .1 11 f :::•=-1-1,i III • . gp • 14 1 i II ....-.......) . , EcD r--- • B • i __I i is I-I OA 11A1 ? 1 I i:1 r. ,•• .-j .411__IL...11..._,Ij , , tii\i v . ,. . • . -, 0 -, —, L 11•11•• NMI OMB .... q..-. ., II lit. o m cr) -, -. _i .....„4 co -, 0 .•(- li • ii Z' 0 0 0 I! \ 1 I l!ig .I L........... Ji 0 D3 Z 1 t._ ..---417- - 11_ t A j... ... ... .. rt \\.? › , lay March 8. 1993 Renton City Council Minutes Page 122 OLD BUSINESS Referred 3/1/93 - Transportation Committee Vice-Chair Schlitzer Transportation presented a report recommending that Council authorize the Mayor and Committee city clerk to execute the agreement between the City and Burlington Transportation: Northern Railroad for right-of-way easements at the intersection of Burlington Northern Park/Lake Washington Boulevard and construction of two railroad Railroad Crossings crossings and the petition to the Washington Utilities and Transportation Agreement Committee for approval to construct these crossings. MOVED BY SCHLITZER, SECONDED BY STREDICKE, COUNCIL CONCUR IN THE COMMITTEE REPORT. CARRIED. Transportation: WSDOT Referred 3/1/93 - Transportation Committee Vice-Chair Schlitzer, Interlocal Agreement, presented a report recommending that Council authorize the Mayor and Talbot Rd. S. Resurfacing the city clerk to execute the resolution, federal air project prospectus, and the Washington State Department of Transportation interlocal agreement for the Talbot Road South improvements project. The Committee further recommended that the resolution regarding this matter be presented for reading and adoption. MOVED BY SCHLITZER, SECONDED BY STREDICKE, COUNCIL CONCUR IN THE COMMITTEE REPORT. CARRIED. (See later resolution.) Transportation: WSDOT Referred 3/1/93 - Transportation Committee Vice-Chair Schlitzer Interlocal Agreement, presented a report recommending that Council authorize the Mayor and Airport Way/Rainier Ave. city clerk to execute the resolution, federal-aid project prospectus, and Resurfacing Washington State Department of Transportation interlocal agreement for the Airport Way and Rainier Avenue South, from Logan to South Second, resurfacing and preservation project. The Committee further recommended that the resolution regarding this matter be presented for reading and adoption. MOVED BY SCHLITZER, SECONDED BY STREDICKE, COUNCIL CONCUR IN THE COMMITTEE REPORT. CARRIED. (See later resolution.) Transportation: WSDOT Referred 3/1/93 - Transportation Committee Vice-Chair Schlitzer Interlocal Agreement, presented a report recommending that Council authorize the Mayor and • C i R. Plan city clerk to execute the interlocal agreement with Washington State Department of Transportation to receive $20,000 federal grant money with a local match of $3,122 for administration of the Commute Trip Reduction Plan. The Committee further recommended that the resolution regarding this matter be presented for reading and adoption. MOVED BY SCHLITZER, SECONDED BY STREDICKF, COUNCIL CONCUR IN THE COMMIT 1 tE REPORT. CARRIED. (See later resolution.) Utilities Committee Referred 12/7/92 - Utilities Committee Chair Schlitzer presented a report Utility. East Renton recommending concurrence with the Planning/Building/Public Works Interceptor Department recommendation to select the West Maplewood Alternative (as modified in the 3/1/93 memorandum to the Utilities Committee and Council) as the preferred sewer interceptor route. The Committee further recommended that Council direct staff to initiate the final design process for this alternative. MOVED BY SCHLITZER, SECONDED BY STREDICKE, COUNCIL CONCUR IN THE COMMITTEE REPORT. CARRIED. Councilwoman Keolker-Wheeler stated that if either of the two absent councilmembers wish to discuss this issue next week, she would be willing to make a motion to reconsider the matter. Attachment n 3.2.4 Significant Unavoidable connection exists between the surface Adverse Impacts water and groundwater of the study area and the groundwater extracted from the I 3.2.4.1 Alternative 1 - Maplewood Maplewood wellfield. The following Heights sections describe the geology and hydrology of the area and the potential There are no significant and unavoidable impacts of the alternative actions adverse impacts to surface water considered in this DEIS. associated with the Maplewood Heights Alternative. 3.3.1 Affected Environment 3.2.4.2 Alternative 2 - South The following paragraphs review the 1 Highlands geology of the area, describe how water moves through the subsurface, and There are no significant and unavoidable provide a framework for understanding adverse impacts to surface water the groundwater of the study area. associated with the South Highlands Alternative. 3.3.1.1 Geology 3.2.4.3 Alternative 3 - West Sediments within the study area are Maplewood sands, gravels, clays, and silts which glaciers and rivers have deposited over There are no significant and unavoidable the last 1.8 million years. These I adverse impacts to surface water sediments are contained within a "basin" 1 associated with the West Maplewood of bedrock, which was formed between 2 Alternative, and 20 million years ago. GroundwaterI. is contained or "ponded" in the bedrock 3.2.4.4 Alternative 4 - No Action basin; this basin is not a smoothly shaped bowl, however, but rather a s There are no significant and unavoidable buried landscape of hills and valleys. adverse impacts to surface water This ancient bedrock surface was associated with the No Action formed by two primary forces. First, the I Alternative. movement of continental plates over millions of years has pushed, folded, and 3.3 GROUNDWATER thrust the bedrock upward. Second, 4 ancient rivers cut valleys down into the The proposed East Renton Interceptor bedrock. However, unlike the ocean, raises concerns about groundwater for which we can penetrate with vessels, two reasons. First, the City of Renton cameras, and other scientific relies entirely on groundwater for its instruments to map the topography of potable water supply. In the future, a the bottom, we cannot see through the large portion of that supply will be met deposited sands and gravels deposited in by a wellfield within the Maplewood Golf the recent geologic past to map the Course, which is just outside the bedrock peaks and valleys beneath southern edge of the project study area. Renton. Second, data indicate that a direct East Renton Interceptor Project Groundwater Draft EIS 42 November, 1991 L CHAPTER 1 SUMMARY I 1.1 PURPOSE AND NEED East Renton Interceptor is one way to Ireduce this threat. The City of Renton currently has inadequate sewer capacity in the South 1.2 STUDY AREA Highlands, Heather Downs, and Maplewood sewage basins . To define the geographic limits of the I Consequently, the City Council passed sewer system analysis, the sewage Resolution 2764 which placed a basins affected by the different moratorium on any new construction alternatives were identified (see Figure 1 • within these basins (see Appendix F). 2, Existing Sewer Basins; Figure 3, After imposing the moratorium, the City Maplewood Heights Interceptor; Figure Council directed the Public Works 5, South Highlands Interceptor, and 1 Department to solve the capacity Figure 6, West Maplewood Interceptor). problems in those basins. The basins were then combined into a project study area, where a 1 The purpose of this Draft Environmental comprehensive impact analysis was Impact Statement(DEIS)is to assess the conducted (see Figure 1, Study Area). consequences of three possible sewer interceptors to solve the capacity 1.3 DESCRIPTION OF I problems. The most effective interceptor ALTERNATIVES alignment should minimize the future 1 cost of connection to service lines and Four alternatives are evaluated in this prevent groundwater contamination of DEIS: (1) Maplewood Heights the Maplewood aquifer. An interceptor Interceptor; (2) South Highlands is a pipeline that receives wastewater Interceptor; (3) West Maplewood flow from collectors or lift stations, and Interceptor; and 4) No Action. Each conveys the wastewater to a treatment alternative, except the No Action plant. Alternative, achieves the objectives of the project to varying degrees (see The East Renton Interceptor project is Section 2.1). The No Action Alternative Iproceeding on a track separate from the provides a basis for comparing the other City's Comprehensive Sewer Plan alternatives. The estimated cost for adoption and Comprehensive Land Use construction of each action alternative IPlan Update for two reasons. First, the was $4,000,000 in July 1989. Given a City is facing an existing sewer capacity construction cost increase of seven problem within the study area that must percent between 1989 and August 1991, I be corrected. Second,it has become clear the estimated cost of each action that exiting and future septic systems alternative is about $4,280,000. within the study area are a threat to the City's water supply. Construction of the 1 East Renton Interceptor Project 1 Summary Draft EIS November, 1991 TL.L___I__........... /. • Although the King County Community Plan Zoning of RS- 15000, or Comprehensive Plan designates all of the at a density of 3 dwelling units per acre study area as urban, the Newcastle Plan using septic systems (see Figure 12 and does not implement the policy. The Table 3.5). It was also assumed that all Newcastle Community Plan emphasizes, the vacant land within the City of however, the importance of providing Renton would be developed based on the adequate utilities at a reasonable cost. City's Six-Year Renton Trends. In other It also recognizes the inherent costs words, single-family development would when planning does not accommodate a occur at 2.2 dwelling units per acre and demonstrated need. multi-family development would occur at 19.2 dwelling units per acre; about 3 The Newcastle Community Plan's multi-family units would be constructed utilities section addresses the East for every single-family unit, and about Renton area and specifically the 3.6% of the area would be developed as Maplewood Heights area (Policy N-53), commercial property. Applying these and discourages building the interceptor. factors to the South Highlands Interceptor, about 3,779 additional While the density of the Maplewood dwelling units could be constructed (see Heights area caused it to be included in Table 3.8). Approximately 1,757 of the Sewerage General Plan's local sewer those units would be single-family and service area, the Newcastle Community 2,022 would be multi-family. This is the Plan pointed out the lack of evidence for highest number of single-family units septic system failures in the area. It anticipated for any of the proposed recommended that the interceptor not be alternatives. constructed, because at the time there were no documented, irreparable health City of Renton Comprehensive Plan hazards. However, as discussed in (1986) and the South Highlands Section 3.3, the City believes that the Interceptor existing drainfields in the study area pose serious threats to the City's aquifer. For those lands within the City of Renton, the South Highlands Interceptor 3.4.3.3 Impacts and Relationship of supports the Renton Comprehensive Plans and Policies to Plan which calls for sewer service as the Alternative 2 - South preferred method of sewage disposal. Highlands Interceptor Under this alternative, very few acres of the unincorporated land would be The South Highlands Interceptor has the capable of receiving sewer service. • smallest potential service area of the Therefore, the South Highlands three alternatives being considered. Interceptor would not implement the Under this alternative, it would not be Comprehensive Plan's preference for possible to serve additional vacant land sanitary sewer service over on-site currently outside the Renton city limits disposal to protect the City's (see Figure 5). Therefore, it was groundwater supply. assumed that all vacant land currently outside the City of Renton would develop The South Highlands Interceptor allows based upon the existing Newcastle sewers to precede new development East Renton Interceptor Project Land Use Draft EIS 83 November, 1991 Land Use Newcastle Community Plan (1982) and the develop in a mariner consistent with the East Maplewood Alternative existing Newcastle Community Plan Zoning, resulting in about 4,175 new dwelling units The East Maplewood Alternative would conflict (see Graph 6). About 1,594 of the new units with the Newcastle Community plan in two ways: would be single-family and about 2,582 units (1) by installing sewers in an area designated for would be multi-family. on-site sewage disposal systems; and (2) by accommodating development at urban densities. City of Renton Comprehensive Plan Although the King County Comprehensive Plan (1986) and the South Highlands designates all of the study area as urban, the Alternative Newcastle Plan does not implement the policy. The Newcastle Community Plan emphasizes, The South Highlands Alternative would not however, the importance of providing adequate address the City of Renton's objectives/policies utilities at a reasonable cost. for sewer service over on-site septic systems to protect the City's groundwater supply. The Newcastle Community Plan's utilities section addresses the East Renton area and specifically the The South Highlands Alternative is also in Maplewood Heights area (Policy N-53), and conflict with the Plan's goal of connecting all discourages building an interceptor. dwellings to sewers. It is similarly in conflict with the Plan's policy that Maplewood Creek While the density of the Maplewood Heights area Sewer Drainage Basin be served with sanitary caused it to be included in the Sewerage General sewer interceptors. Plan's local sewer service area, the Newcastle Community Plan pointed out the lack of evidence King County Comprehensive Plan (1985) for septic system failures in the area. It and the South Highlands Alternative recommended that the interceptor not be constructed, because at the time there were no The South Highlands Alternative is in conflict documented, irreparable health hazards. However, with the King County Comprehensive Plan's as discussed in Section 33, the City believes that policy to support planned urban growth at the existing drainfields in the study area pose urban levels of service. The lack of sewer serious threats to the City's aquifer. service under this alternative would affect the densities that could ultimately be permitted in 3.4.3.3 Impacts and Relationship of the study area. Since this alternative would not Plans and Policies to extend service to the Plan's local service areas, Alternative 2 - South it would not allow for the conversion to urban Highlands Alternative densities that the Plan specifies should occur as part of the evolving planning and development The Interceptor would serve properties within the process. present city limits and allow for service to a small area chat is currently outside the city limits (see Newcastle Community Plan (1982) and Figure 5). Since most of the service area is within the South Highlands Alternative the city limits, the land use projection of this assumes the entire service area would develop The South Highlands Alternative would be according to the Six-Year Renton Trends. Vacant consistent with the Newcastle Community lands that are outside the potential service area of Plan's recommended residential densities of 1 the South Highlands Alternative were assumed to to 2 units per acre for the unincorporated area East Renton Interceptor Project RH2 Engineers, Planners, Scientists Final EIS 67 November 1992 Af 4-anl-vmor.4- v Z »- e- au s 4 Nile ,ftle. q S c � N 3 eu= M •�.5 • 2 ,..UI a.Y r C ° 3 - i 9 3 �... .naV y0 0 212 izmE 0 E.e c 'a g 50_0 3 114 � ao2�2.a �v� " " E3E ub ego. ; E9 ° w40 sQ 9 � x » •3gcpp 3o .2j$?E ?4v 4 a a�w, .0 aE a -43 » c9 Fb o $ 52 a 43 ) C > a ee 4 Y e • " u C C 4, g F-W e2 2 5 3 > C ti . u'O F,,00 a N f 4 4 C1. 1. • U • 440Mk 400444.144 .ee.e uo .n 0Cal. n •0 • nOo*o • b• 44O >.,.4 �+.C.40O 0 :..C4 0..) IA 000W> 60U440.441014 CZ., 0= a-,.a•M a a. N~i. 041, 00 ,......4u M 1..4 4.. m 0.. o.s C 0., 4 n 0 .+ C� YC.. 4 qq 43 4e 04 ..M33v .. Y4..40..10 .r a .. 4.4 ev ., s. 0 0.,4 ..., e , M M 0+4 v C V.1 e u .. e > 0A~N., ° 4 • 0 3 e oar q n O in.4 0 0 • 1. a n Y >.7 U 0.,�..M e C• y y o NG'. Y C .�'+�i"i J. a ^,,Oo O y e C 0 7 ro 3 0 0 .auk a Y•.. 4 Y ...IA O v ...Oi a Z^O. 3 �' .. M .-, r 4.., .4.•1 R o ,: •+ a 14 C •4+ u y U 4•+..M 4 L, • 00 .1M., 7 4 0 Y 0.4 .e 4 ~". O.0 3 0 .1 ", 4 "+ 0.7 M C M > ~ 4 4.e O C t0 .y Y >.p 0 a 0 a 4+. 4 V `4M >2 w N " +O+-r ^ .. Oou 03, 4Cu 7 •Vi.11 N VMCetl OC.1C*+ OXOtl3, 4 4 • AM .•+.Ci L M W 4 O r O 0 ; p M C 0 ., .0 Z o•N O W •..,� 4.2 O a U.0 Y.0 400 o�, p 1a C U v O a n•q 0 O 4 •.0 U n .� O 4 C«v C 00 O O Y.e n 4 0.0 A E M C O M ^..-, • 7 U G "V e V Y , l O tl 4 O ./ i 'O a.•i C q N C.0 O.d +1 a M 0 V.-,0400A .1. ..R4320 ma 0400.0 4 V c~ 0.A^4 3 . .-1.4'0 M 4 4~', ". ...0 V4, u 4 V 3. • Y 0 ~� 3Ga2•0 • R07 > O 4C ; GY0e-�' .� � C. BA 0.30-.. .,A0.Ni r.4'O4•-, OU .sGOp4+1 ""p Ya oali p. 9�,1Yo gp4 NpYVO �42z+2 01 .4• 14 Y"� u 1., tl > ��� •q• p��.CO N i.HOzgUOM aM / y • g7eg� 3,�„'NtlgO Of CM C 3a•.p. O use o3. aN M >A`. N1a .0 • M C• .e4 O > O 7M M.+.O .99� ON4 •pr i,N 4+ • 4p ar.. • �i+AM e• q % • O Q O a^U Y,-. 14 a O.0 p•y a U�,4 p/3 Y 0 y., p M •q �� 4 • M q 0' d V NM > > W .� 140 °.CN y0 •"� U O.p Mm,Op U 4+ 4 .40 . • 002M.4 • • 0 (�..1n 0 •J �.0 •�� ar UAC 4O .~.� C .>•1.400 M +, .y �r.r •M 1. q •-4 1, C 4 • 4 0.'C ..N a; 1.••, p+s !! 9 O►r e 4 7Q > 41 14 N 0.N.•...N •.0 O .-, s.....41 0 .+.-. 'V n 0.. 0 .2 p a+ 4) .1 '0 Gq O C G4-,.'V 13 O 4 CA 7m .•4C.+ 00 q 7 W O C 'C .•/ pM 1. W • M • =C • 0 4 0 M 4 • q V N .+ 0.-, 4 0 0 0., O % O 4 0 • r •0.0 M•..P..,M O V ..M-0 3 7 3^, N M q 1, 0 q C s .e U O 4� 3 F y}.. 4 7 N0..-, O CO•y 'C 40C • p0~'e C C00.04J • ea o.C'40044F el 0ga C.4 .4m vs.''m yd0_ .44 a ,4 2 0• „ 0� p'' .4 ,N-,�' 2M.ye . e� 4A~e.,.44 �2Qp = Aq 'O44 > >'C O..4 c 4' P..-,.0 Z74P. YY 0=. WMeo`' 4 O.4.44•,.Q >O"� 0a % VJ >4A 342.2 C� 4MY�,030, �� �V.q.4. rC 4.343..CU1�. ya� 70W q °RM� P••4J • V"OZ^+ 1•i Jy.'.0 q01•. U C.•C >., 3 0 O 44.y • 4 CM C 2C7 >. O Cq4 01i.4 0 ±,/)�4. 4 0 , 747.W 0 O M • y 0 >.M., C..+ 404 "'8 • 4• p.v • E� 9 144, 90004 O X NO O ° •O..0 y * ° o-•� C � 3 4 0 ,p • 3 >., .0 O O ^, 4 C� 0 3i'1 p .0 ,... .0 V >.U N •b C 0 •.4 1 0.y, • I 0 • 4. 0 X 0 O C OV a • .▪ 0 >V •4 y 1.O1 > >4J_4 �V Op.p O y,4 �.,.eiO..�j pN -a N •^O • C O • tlL A • Yt0 O., O C �.-1Xb M.� e A O M...O >.0 •rn C.. 4.40 • O 4Y CM 0.~ ... n-, 4 >.M.a 4•'03.. M C OOa4/4.10 >4y cif 4 x • Oa V•+ u C 4 0 n., >.0 4 .1 0 4. •C p'~ 4 0 3 W M C V t.) O • N4.0.44.0 ). 4.1111...4 p • O 0 CC O W • C e r3 .0 3 44 s. 4 4 0 N , 444.... . M .-, 40.+1. 0 7C. • • 44 O 0 0 0^. P.0. 0 M 3 0 0.0 N 4 U•4 0�i 1.12 4 4 3 r 101.4 U 1, M e C vie., 4 4 1... w e I C7 • U > .'MOO V003 f. 4 V343N4 004.1C440 000 Id .• 64 E 4 a .0 Y.4C0.-.-a 4f..C4 • 4 O.4O V.4O., 4C rc.. 31l.4.. 14 .00.> n0.00.,O.'% N•M M1•66CC• 4 J to..4 (4/ f+a.4 3 4 4 .] a.NZ'V 4 Gu 0.,Z.+.O a 3 0 ,, ,,,,..4 .,-a 4 F a 0.40• CW U 0 ►. U 10.4 3 N T4-+-=nl-.m c.n 4- T . Win► ". W_ : IP I • i 1 } c � Sunset -, rc 81 } 1 1t;saourah Rd P NE 12 St r Nme am so ma in we el �•Av .. , i i i —• - • 4, ; -4�, NE 10th St -1-L__ u, H 0/ NOrri. 01 to "' T NE 7th St) > Pr aPe r t-5 ;�� • � 1�f.1�af. e = a, ' w f s` • - W a > N C 1 > e . ,�% Y` a ® 2., y 1tr� , SE = :>, t • eir l _,�...Ito .o — a s 111�/5' © ©_i • Ott'? It 111-tom_3td w• o. .444REN ON I '• <• w I -. e I ( r• > ` 1 < 1 V• • - p • '�- lllfiifl/llf!>♦I tlfilll(j I-_ mama . Lk+O11 L-_-- /,- 0. !t N V . r s Renton ��- 1y M Ole Virs YRd 1 �O • -J Ire Fi ure 17 Existing METRO Transit Route LE-.CEND •••••• Route 111 ii '4 Route 106 --*-mat• Route 114 1smut Route 147 um n. Route 107 0 Transit Point Attachment J Table 3.11. East Renton Interceptor Traffic Study Intersections Meeting High-Accident Standard Intersection Average Annual Accidents NE Sunset Boulevard/NE 3rd Street 20.3 • SE 128th Street/138th Avenue SE 16.7 Maple Valley Highway/I-405 Northbound Ramps 12.0 NE 4th Street/Union Avenue SE 11.0 NE Sunset Boulevard/Bronson Way North 10.0 NE Sunset Boulevard/Union Avenue SE 6.7 NE Sunset Boulevard/138th Avenue SE 6.0 NE Park Drive/I-405 Northbound Ramps 6.0 NE Park Drive/I-405 Southbound Ramps 6.0 NE 4th Street/Monroe Avenue NE 5.0 Source: City of Renton,TDA Inc. Table 3.12 Existing Transit Service to and from East Renton Route Areas Served Frequency Number 106 Kennydale,Renton Highlands, Downtown Renton, Peak - 30 min Skyway, Rainier Beach,Downtown Seattle Tunnel Off- 60 min 107 Renton Highlands, Renton-Boeing, Downtown Peak - 30 min Renton, Bryn Mawr, Rainier Beach, Downtown Off - 60 min Seattle Tunnel 111 Lake McDonald, Renton Highlands Park & Ride, Peak only Kennydale, Newport Hills Park& Ride, 35 minutes Downtown Seattle • 114 Renton Highlands, Lake Boren, Newport Hills, Peak only Downtown Seattle 30 minutes 147 Lake Kathleen,East Renton, South Renton Park Peak- 30 min & Ride, Downtown Seattle Off- 60 min Source: METRO,TDA Inc. East Renton Interceptor Project Transportation Draft EIS 92 November, 1991