HomeMy WebLinkAboutJ-Apron_E_Landscape_Var_190703_v1.pdf
425-869-2670 ■ 800-865-9847 (fax) ■ 8420 154th Avenue NE, Ste 120■ Redmond, Washington 98052 ■ www.dowl.com
Alaska ■ Arizona ■ Colorado ■ Montana ■ Oregon ■ Washington ■ Wyoming
July 2, 2019
W.O. 13726
Ms. Rohini Nair
City of Renton
1055 South Grady Way
Renton, WA, 98051-3232
Subject: Boeing Apron E New Stalls & Paint Hangar Project – Parking Lot Landscape Variance
Dear Ms. Rohini:
On behalf of the Boeing Company, this letter includes our request for a code variance from the City of Renton
Landscape criteria for Interior parking lot landscaping, as required by Renton Municipal Code 4-4-070
“Landscaping”. As noted in Section R, to deviate from the provisions of 4-4-070 a variance must be
submitted and approved pursuant to RMC 4-9-250B5 (listed in italics above).
Variance Request Justification: Detailed below is the justification requirements provided by the City of
Renton along with our explanation as to why this project should receive a variance and the measures that the
project will take to mitigate any adverse effects that may be encountered by the adjacent property owners.
The applicant suffers practical difficulties and unnecessary hardship and the variance is necessary
because of special circumstances applicable to subject property, including size, shape, topography,
and location or surroundings of the subject property, and the strict application of the Zoning Code is
found to deprive subject property owner of rights and privileges enjoyed by other property owners in
the vicinity and under identical zone classification;
o With respect to the parking lot landscape requirements, the parking lot area this variance
covers will be surrounded by a proposed aircraft hangar to the east, proposed Apron E to the
north and existing Apron D to the west. (See attached Exhibit A). Boeing follows the Federal
Aviation Administration (FAA) criteria for minimizing Foreign Object Debris (FOD) for all
aircraft operations areas. Specifically, in the apron and hangar areas of Boeing properties that
conduct aircraft operations, the Advisory Circular AC 150/5210-24 Airport Foreign Object
Debris (FOD) Management is followed. The document provides direction on prevention,
detection, removal and evaluation. This is not only constant with other adjacent aircraft
facilities but is in compliance with federal guidelines adhered to nationwide for similar
facilities.
Foreign Object Debris (FOD) is “Any object, live or not, located in an inappropriate location
in the airport environment that has the capacity to injure airport or air carrier personnel and
damage aircraft”.
Further from AC AC 150/5210-24: “The presence of FOD on an airport’s air operations
area (AOA) poses a significant threat to the safety of air travel. FOD has the potential to
damage aircraft during critical phases of flight, which can lead to catastrophic loss of life
and airframe, and at the very least increased maintenance and operating costs. FOD hazards
can be reduced, however, through the implementation of a FOD management program and
the effective use of FOD detection and removal equipment.
“The surfaces of all movement areas including pavements (runways, taxiways and aprons)
and adjacent areas shall be inspected and their conditions monitored regularly as part of an
Ms. Rohini Nair
City of Renton
July 02, 2019
Page 2
425-869-2670 ■ 800-865-9847 (fax) ■ 8420 154th Avenue NE, Ste 120■ Redmond, Washington 98052 ■ www.dowl.com
Alaska ■ Arizona ■ Colorado ■ Montana ■ Oregon ■ Washington ■ Wyoming
aerodrome preventive and corrective maintenance program with the objective of avoiding
and eliminating any loose objects/debris that might cause damage to aircraft or impair the
operation of aircraft systems.”
The granting of the variance will not be materially detrimental to the public welfare or injurious to
the property or improvements in the vicinity and zone in which subject property is situated;
o The existing area where the parking lot is being proposed is the current Boeing Fire Station
and an existing parking lot. Full landscaping, incompliance with the City of Renton code is
proposed between the southern end of the parking lot and the public athletic fields. The
southern edge of the proposed parking lot is the only portion adjacent to property not owned
by Boeing. Being that the project proposes to provide fully compliant landscaping within
areas visible to or accessed by the public, there will be no detriment to the public.
The approval shall not constitute a grant of special privilege inconsistent with the limitation upon
uses of other properties in the vicinity and zone in which the subject property is situated; and
o The property owner is in no way requesting special privilege nor will the owner benefit in
any way beyond the ability to continue historic operations at this site. The variance is only
being requested to maintain the property owner’s compliance with FAA regulations for this
type of facility. Granting of this variance would be consistent with the current property use
and adjacent airport and aircraft facilities landscaping requirements and conditions.
The approval is the minimum variance that will accomplish the desired purpose.
o Boeing prides itself as an environmental steward, trying to minimize and avoid environmental
impacts in all of its operations. In addition Boeing prides itself on being a “good neighbor”
contributing to the community in positive ways; Boeing goes to significant efforts to enhance
the community with aesthetics associated with its facilities with improvements that are in
keeping with the Renton Municipal Code criteria and of benefit to neighbors, employees and
the larger community. To that end Boeing has always been willing and open to providing
landscaping and other community improvements where applicable and when possible. If not
for the specific and somewhat special requirements imposed on Boeing by the FAA for this
type of facility landscaping would be provided at this location.
We are formally requesting that the parking lot landscaping requirements for the shown in Exhibit A for this
project be waived based on the justification provided within this variance request.
Please let us know if you have any questions.
Sincerely,
DOWL
Travis W Neu, P.E.
Project Manager
I ,
COMPRESSED AIR
TRAFFIC CURB l�I X -i-c�-�-��-=�1 �'--,-0 ,_2_0_1 9------,0
I
BOEING DOMESTIC WATER BOEING FIRE WATER i:= .... --hio
cJJ-TBoE1NG HIGH PREssuRE wAT�RL D l
NEW BOEING FIRE HYDRANT
HIGH-BAY AREA
'
HIGH-BAY AREA
o �; I � I. z <( c..,
I
SWING GATE r----..JLNEW BOEING FIRE HYDRANT
B □
' ,, ' ,,,
0 \', B ,I\ �x
' \'' ' '
BL(t 5-2 ,,
,._,'�D
er , :'1/-·,c.,-;:Z. -C'
::��7��-=\j---,-\��;,...� STALL \ (1 O'X20') '
� \\
UJ----TURNSTILE GATE PAINT BAY #7 PAINT BAY #B
PROPOSED 5-70 PAINT HANGAR BUILDING
BUILDING AREA LEVEL
ONE AREA -72,145 SF (PAINT BAYS AND SUPPORT)
LEVEL TWO AREA -20,504 SF (SUPPORT AND OFFICE)
LEVEL THREE AREA -46,940 SF (MECHANICAL)
EXISTING BOEING FIRE HYDRANT {TO BE REMOVED) \\ \\ \\I\ l\·-·'.......--LIGHT POLE
SANITARY SEWER SYSTEM
LOWER ROOF AREA
SUPPORT AREA (LEVEL 1)
SUPPORT AND OFFICE AREA (LEVEL 2)
MECHANICAL (LEVEL 3)
BOEING HIGH PRESSUR COMPRESS
PROPOSED 5-71 UTILITY SUPPORT BUILDING
UTILITY SUPPORT BUILDING
LIGHT POLE .\\----!00;---l-t-� LEVEL ONE AREA -5,425 SF
�l""""''\--+---1---+---=-+------+=-+ LIGHT POLE--t\-\---ll
5-110 5-124
2 BOEING FIRE WATER ---FW-.---t---fW---1�--FW'----FY TURNSTILE GATE......_ _ __,,
LO <O ---------------------
LO
f :c
43'
f :c
io' ,.,., :
I
. '
L
SECURITY FENCE
V. "·
Y. J0 0
� I)
� � 0 ),( I I , I i
/ ,{ § I i I j � DRIVEWAY // /fII I I I Ill! J NEW BOEING FIRE HYDRANT+
��·- • • • E'llWMH <9--�J';""-- --ss ----ss --"""'l,-ss ----ss ----�---""" o ss ----ss ----ss ----ss ----ss ----ss --,;;:-@
\- ,;-
v· _J
�------'.:, ---------------, -------�
\
; �-,
\_
0
PRQPERJY IIN __....P.-+-j _ � � _ Q""'-· __ '-"'4
LIGHT POLE NEW BOEING FIRE HYDRANT
TRAFFIC CURB
2 r--;._,n51 .lj //1 Ii�',....,...,.__
_ B(!!_NifilROPERTY LINE_ _ O O f / /
-LIGITT�LE �: �o�•�m��,�
\ SANITARY SEWER O � EASEMENT
\ 100' SHORELINE - --Q I� I 0
LEGEND !-PROPER TY LINE
EASEMEN T
I I
LT J--j-f-PDffl
I
*
:z
<( I
..
\ SETBACK
\ CONTROL POINT TABLE BUILDING COORDINATE TABLE ----HPW--6" HI GH PRESSURE WATER LINE
\ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \
J)
(./', cC
POINT DESCRIPTION
200
201
202
203
204
16420
NORTHING EASTING DESCRIPTION
182356.36 1299324.4 7 PKW FND DHA 64
182038.42 1299423.85 FND PANEL POINT
181929.98 1299430.54 RPC SET
181885.81 1299236.35 SCRIBE SET
181684.37 1299247.98 SCRIBE SET
181740.53 1299491. 91 FND PKW DHA-63
BLDG NAME BLDG CORNER NO. NORTHING EASTING SIZE
@ 181702.33 1300394.54
BLDG 5-71 @ 181702.33 1300556.54 {UTILITY BLDG) @ 35' X 162' 181737.33 1300556.54
@ 181737.33 1300394.54
SF
5,670
----CW ---4" DOMESTIC WATER LINE----FW ---10" FIRE WATER LINE----A---4" AIR LINE ----E ---ELECTRIC AL
A FIRE HYDRANT
•BOLLARD
� BLAS T FENCE FOUNDATION
���������� SOUND WALL FOUND A TION
--1:JC' SSE --100' SHORELINE SETBACK
-- 7 ' SSR --200' SHORELINE SETBACK
--X---X--CHAINLINK FENCE
-----1D1-----1D-ORNAMENTAL FENCE GALVANIZATION NOTE BUILDING COORDINATE TABLE DURASLOT DRAIN
SYM
THERE SHALL BE NO EXPOSED GALVANIZED MATERIALS, COATINGS OR ZINC APPLIED SURFACE TREATMENTS ON ANY EXTERIOR OR UNDERGROUND MATERIALS OR SURFACES. ALL GALVANIZED OR ZINC APPLIED MATERIALS OR COATINGS SHALL BE PERMANENTLY PAINTED OR COATED TO PREVENT EXPOSURE OF THE GALVANIZED/ZINC MATERIALS PRIOR TO INSTALLATION OR COMPLETION OF CONSTRUCTION.
DATUM NOTE:
PLANS PREPARED USING NGVD 29 AS THE VERTICAL DATUM. TO CONVERT TO NAVO 88 ADD 3.556 FEET TO ALL ELEVATIONS.
REVISION BY APPROVED DATE SYM
BLDG NAME
BLDG 5-70 (PAINT HANGAR)
BLDG CORNER NO. NORTHING
@ 181777.33
@ 181777.33
@ 182010.83
@) 182010.83
REVISION BY APPROVED DATE
EASTING SIZE SF
1300302.87
1300610.04 235' X 307' 72,145 1300610.04
1300303.04
ACCEPTABILITY
THIS DESIGN AND/OR
DRAWN DATE R. TEMPLADO 07.01.19 CHECKED
--STS---
---SS---
SUBTITLE
STORM SEWER
SANI TAR Y SEWER
CONCR ETE INLE T, GRATE
TYPE 2 CA TCH BASIN, SOLID LID
TYPE 2 CA TCH BASIN, GR ATE
LIGHT POLE
EXHIBIT A
0
C10
40 20 0
SCALE: 1 :40
X
20 40 80
N 5TH ST
KEY PLAN SCALE: NONE
C26 AIRP�r W y
LAND USE PERMIT/SEPA
NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION
DESIGN BY�D=O=WL�--DATE 07.01.19
�OWL CURRENT REVISION SYMB0LO R I G DATE 35989 07.01.19 ORIG APRON E -STALLS PHASE I 199389 DOWL lWN 07.01.19
<ti-BOEING•
SPECIFICATION IS APPROVED T. NEU 07.01.19
APPROVED BY 0EPT. 0ATE T. NEU 07.01.19 ���-fE:i;lrn@�-1-""':""-'-'-"ITT�----1\PRl���'ATT<�i:IA<:f'1 ______ 1 sHEETTIRE APRON E -STALLS PHASE 1 SEQUENCE NO. EXHB A CHECKED D.MURATA 07.01.19 APPROVE0 RENTON SITE 1-----------+--------l
a, ..___
APPROVE0 1-c=�--------+-------l c.. RENTON DWG NO.CIVIL MASTER 05-APRON-E-C5