The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutAgenda AGENDA Planning & Development Committee Regular Meeting 4:30 PM - Thursday, May 25, 2017 Council Conference Room, 7th Floor, City Hall – 1055 S. Grady Way 1. City Center Community Plan 2. Docket #12 a) Public Hearing Presentation to Planning Commission 3. Shopping Carts a) Staff Report 4. Emerging Issues in CED DOCKET12: GROUPBPlanning Commission Public HearingMay 3, 2017AGENDA ITEM #2. a) DOCKET#134:CLUSTERINGPROVISIONSAGENDA ITEM #2. a) INTENT OFCLUSTERINGPROVISIONS• Clustering allowed in R-1 and R-4 zones in exchange for public benefit (30% open space)• Open space creates an amenity that adds value, but rarely results in a greater ROI for a developerAGENDA ITEM #2. a) EFFECTS OFCLUSTERINGPROVISIONS• R-4 zoned property with critical areas• Critical areas cannot be developed and are preserved as open space• Clustering allowed in exchange for a public benefit• 30% open space dedication permits use of R-6 standards•Cluster development can be achieved thru a PUDAGENDA ITEM #2. a) PUDSVS. CLUSTERDEVELOPMENTPUDs:• Able to modify development standards (e.g., lot dimensions, building coverage, parking, design standards) based on the site;•ButUNABLEto modify density, allowed uses, procedures, and some specific limitations (e.g., critical areas regulations)Decision Criteria:• Demonstrate superior development• Public Benefit:Enhanced critical area protectionPreserves, enhances, or rehabilitates natural features Provides public facilities Use of Sustainable Development Techniques• Additional review criteria (e.g., building and site design, circulation, etc.)• Specific open space standardsClustering Provisions:• Prescribed development standards (e.g., lot dimensions, coverage, etc.) Decision Criteria:• 30% open space (can include critical areas)• Reduced to 20% when public access is provided and soft surface trails are within critical areas.AGENDA ITEM #2. a) DOCKET#135:UNDERGROUNDINGAGENDA ITEM #2. a) D‐135: UNDERGROUNDING• On hold to further develop strategy to address Planning Commission concernsAGENDA ITEM #2. a) DOCKET#137:DOWNTOWNSTREETSCAPEAGENDA ITEM #2. a) DESIGN STANDARDS•Proposed standards follow other design requirements•Offer prescriptive standard•Guidelines for alternativesAGENDA ITEM #2. a) STREETTYPOLOGYAGENDA ITEM #2. a) DESIGNSTANDARDS•Sidewalk Paving•Crosswalks•Raised Intersections•Detectable Warnings•Trench Drains•Pedestrian Streetlights•Signal and Other Poles•Bike Racks•Bollards•Newspaper Racks•Benches•Streetscape Fencing•Waste & Recycling Receptacles•Ash Receptacles•Tree Pits & Tree Grates•Landscape Strips•Landscape Street Fencing•IrrigationAGENDA ITEM #2. a) GUIDELINES•Curb Extensions•Stormwater Management•Utility Cabinets and Signal Boxes•Alternative Seating Options•Streetscape Planting and MaintenanceAGENDA ITEM #2. a) PLACEMAKING‐GUIDELINES•Parklets•Streateries•Movable and Temporary Seating•Festival Streets•Wayfinding•Banners and Pole Connections•Gateway Features•Public ArtAGENDA ITEM #2. a) PLACEMAKING‐GUIDELINESAGENDA ITEM #2. a) DOCKET#138:REFUSE ANDRECYCLINGAGENDA ITEM #2. a) BACKGROUND•Two issues with current code•No standards for refuse and recycling carts for multifamily housing•Requirements for dumpster enclosures not meeting intent AGENDA ITEM #2. a) PROPOSEDSTANDARDS•Require storage space be providedGarage•Minimum 2’ x 6’•5’ vertical clearance•Per unitOutside •Minimum 2’ x 6’•Screened with 4’ wood or ornamental metal•Per unit or grouped, up to 4AGENDA ITEM #2. a) PROPOSEDAMENDMENT•Currently require minimum 15’ vertical clearance for dumpster enclosures•Amend to no more than 12’ vertical clearance AGENDA ITEM #2. a) DOCKET#139:HEARINGEXAMINERAGENDA ITEM #2. a) 1. While processing Reconsiderations, appeal period paused2. Reconsideration arguments limited to arguments in the record3. Each Party of Record limited to one Reconsideration4. Prior appealing, must first exhaust “administrative remedies” (e.g., seek a reconsideration or other remedies that may be available)5. Only City, applicant/land owner, person who filed appeal, or expert witnesses may testify6. Title IV and Comprehensive Plan Amendments exempt from consolidated review7. Title IV and Comprehensive Plan Amendments also exempt from state mandated 120-day review period8. Street vacations and Title IV or Comprehensive Plan amendments exempt from revocation if not implemented within two years of decisionPROPOSEDRMC AMENDMENTSAGENDA ITEM #2. a) 1. Merit and value for community, will not adversely affect public health, safety, and welfare2. Not materially detrimental to uses or properties in immediate vicinity3. Since original zoning or most recent rezone, conditions affecting the property have substantially changed as a result of, but not limited to, public improvements or permitted private development 4. The property was not specifically considered during the last land use analysis and area-wide zoning5. Characteristics are most similar to purpose and intent of proposed zone, as well as, the zone-specific policy of proposed zone6. If Community Plan for area has been adopted, the impacts of the rezone upon the Plan have been consideredPROPOSEDRMC AMENDMENTS–REZONECRITERIAAGENDA ITEM #2. a) DOCKET#140:SMALLCELL ANDDASAGENDA ITEM #2. a) D‐140: SMALLCELL ANDDAS• On hold to further develop strategy to address Planning Commission concernsAGENDA ITEM #2. a) NEXTSTEP• Deliberations and Recommendation• May 17, 2017 AGENDA ITEM #2. a) SHOPPING CARTS Since April of 2016, when cart collection began, there have been 43 occurrences when a single store “lost” four or more carts in a month. For contrast, compared to the same timeframe there were 162 occurrences when a single store “lost” three or fewer carts in a month. In other words, among stores that have “lost” carts within the past 13 months, the loss of four or more carts by a single store within a month has accounted for about only 20% of all occurrences. Among the 47 stores that have “lost” a cart within the past 13 months: There were 541 lost, abandoned, or stolen carts; When a store did lose one or more carts within any given month, about half the time it was just one cart. The chart below shows the 13-month trend of the six stores that most commonly “lose” carts: AGENDA ITEM #3. a)