Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutAgenda AGENDA Planning & Development Committee Regular Meeting 5:00 PM - Monday, May 13, 2019 Council Conference Room, 7th Floor, City Hall – 1055 S. Grady Way 1. Benson Hill Community Plan Advisory Board Appointment - Conway a) AB - 2381 Mayor Law appoints Mr. Sean Conway to the Benson Hill Community Plan Advisory Board for a term expiring on May 1, 2024. 2. Docket #14 a) AB - 2368 Community & Economic Development Department submits the 2018 Title IV Docket #14 Amendments. Following review by the Planning Commission, code revisions recommendations will be presented to Council. 3. Emerging Issues in CED AB - 2381 City Council Regular Meeting - 06 May 2019 SUBJECT/TITLE: Appointment to Benson Hill Community Plan Advisory Board RECOMMENDED ACTION: Refer to Planning & Development Committee DEPARTMENT: Executive Department STAFF CONTACT: April Alexander, Executive Assistant EXT.: 6520 FISCAL IMPACT SUMMARY: None SUMMARY OF ACTION: Mayor Law appoints Mr. Sean Conway to the Benson Hill Community Plan Advisory Board for a term expiring 5/1/24. EXHIBITS: A. Recommendation Memo B. Application STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Confirm Mayor Law's appointment of Mr. Conway to the Benson Hill Community Plan Advisory Board. AGENDA ITEM #1. a) DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY AND ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT M E M O R A N D U M DATE: May 1, 2019 TO: Denis Law, Mayor FROM: C. E. “Chip” Vincent, CED Administrator STAFF CONTACT: Paul Hintz, Associate Planner, x7436 SUBJECT: Benson Hill Community Plan Advisory Board Mr. Sean Conway recently applied to serve on the Benson Hill Community Plan Advisory Board. Sean has lived in the Benson Hill area since 1996 and for the past eight years has been working for municipal recreation and parks departments, including the City of Renton as a Recreation Assistant. Staff believe that Sean will be a valuable addition to the Board and recommends him for a five- year term on the Benson Hill Community Plan Advisory Board. AGENDA ITEM #1. a) April Alexander From:notification@civiclive.com Sent:Thursday,April 25,2019 12:03 PM To:April Alexander Subject:Application for Boards/Commissions/Committees 201 9-04-25 12:02 PM(PST) Submission Notification Application for Boards/Commissions/Committees 2019-04-25 12:02 PM(PST)was submitted by Guest on 4/25/2019 3:02:45 PM (GMT-08:00)Canada/Pacific Name Value Airport Advisory Committee* Civil Service Commission* Community Plan Advisory Board -Benson Hill Community Plan Advisory Board -Benson Hill Community Plan Advisory Board -City Center Historical/Museum Board* Housing Authority* Human Services Advisory Committee* Library Advisory Board* Municipal Arts Commission* Parks Commission*Parks Commission* Planning Commission* Senior Citizens Advisory Committee* Sister City Committee -Cuautla Sister City Committee -Nishiwaki Gender Mr. Name Sean Conway Address:—I iimail Phone AltPhone: Resident Yes ResidentSince 1996 formerresidence Sea-tac •Master of Science in Management and Leadership - Western Governor’s University 6/2016 —3/2018 •BachelorEducationBackground..of Arts in Sport Management —Washington State University 8/2008 —12/2012 Over 8 year working in local city government,specifically in Recreation and Facility Management.City of Kirkland - Recreation Supervisor -2/18-Present City of Covington -OccupationalBackground Athletics Specialist -5/14-1/18 City of Kent -Parks Program Assistant -3/13-5/14 City of Renton -Recreation Assistant -3/13-6/16 City of Issaquah -Program Assistant - 1 AGENDA ITEM #1. a) 11/12-3/13 City of Mercer Island -Recreation Assistant - 5/12-10/13 City of Pullman -Recreation Aide &Lifeguard - 6/11-4/12 Emp1oyer: Washington Recreation and Park Association Member •.Member of Youth Athletic facility (YAF)Grant CommitteeCommunityActivitiesthroughWashingtonRecreation&Conservation Office Volunteer Sports Coach I want to be more informed about the happenings in my community and feel like I can help bring perspective andReasonforapplyrng•.fresh ideas to the city and commission.In the end,my goal is to improve my community. Day Meetings Night Meetings Night Meetings To view this form submission online,please follow the link below: https ://rentonwa.gov/formlone.aspx?obj ectldl 5 544299&contextld=92 1 2967&retumto=submissions 2 AGENDA ITEM #1. a) AB - 2368 City Council Regular Meeting - 22 Apr 2019 SUBJECT/TITLE: 2019 Title IV Docket #14 Amendments Review RECOMMENDED ACTION: Refer to Planning Commission and Planning & Development Committee DEPARTMENT: Community & Economic Development Department STAFF CONTACT: Angie Mathias, Long Range Planning Manager EXT.: 6576 FISCAL IMPACT SUMMARY: N/A SUMMARY OF ACTION: RMC 4-8-070G outlines the types of review the Planning Commission shall conduct. The review of the Development Regulations (Title IV Docket) process is specifically listed. Land Use Regulations review occurs upon Council request. The Planning Commission will make recommendations regarding the Land Use Regulations to the Council. Final recommendation of the Title IV Docket will be the authority of the Council. This process is codified in RMC 4-9-025, Title IV Development Regulation Revision Process. Staff has compiled a series of amendments to Title IV of the Renton Municipal Code (Development Regulations) that initiates several new regulatory initiatives that respond to important issues facing the City. The proposed list of amendments includes City initiated amendments as shown in the 2019 Title IV Docket #14 Amendments Table and was arrived at after consultation with the Planning Commission and Planning & Development Committee. EXHIBITS: A. Issue Paper STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Refer the 2018 Title IV Docket #14 Amendments to the Planning and Development Committee and Planning Commission for review. Following this review, the Planning Commission will present code revision recommendations to Council. AGENDA ITEM #2. a) DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY & ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT M E M O R A N D U M DATE:April 15, 2019 TO:Don Persson, Council President Members of Renton City Council VIA:Denis Law, Mayor FROM:C. E. “Chip” Vincent, CED Administrator (x6588) STAFF CONTACT:Angie Mathias, Long Range Planning Manager (x6576) SUBJECT:2019 Title IV Docket #14 Amendments Review ISSUE: Should the 2019 Title IV Docket #14 Amendments be referred to the Planning & Development Committee and the Planning Commission? RECOMMENDATION: Refer the 2019 Title IV Docket #14 Amendments to the Planning and Development Committee and Planning Commission for review. Following this review, the Planning Commission will present code revision recommendations to Council. BACKGROUND SUMMARY: RMC 4-8-070G outlines the types of review the Planning Commission shall conduct. The review of the Development Regulations (Title IV Docket) process is specifically listed. Land Use Regulations review occurs upon Council request. The Planning Commission will make recommendations regarding the Land Use Regulations to the Council. Final recommendation of the Title IV Docket will be the authority of the Council. Title IV Development Regulations This process is codified in RMC 4-9-025, Title IV Development Regulation Revision Process. Staff has compiled a series of amendments to Title IV of the Renton Municipal Code (Development Regulations) that initiates several new regulatory initiatives that respond to important issues facing the City. The proposed list of amendments includes City initiated amendments as shown in the 2019 Title IV Docket #14 Amendments Table and was arrived at after consultation with the Planning Commission and Planning & Development Committee. CONCLUSION: The proposed schedule for review of the Title IV Docket #14 Amendments is for the Planning Commission review to occur during May 2019 to November 2019. AGENDA ITEM #2. a) 2019 TITLE IV DOCKET #14 AMENDMENTS City Initiated Amendments Modifications Review all sections of the code to determine if a modification is the appropriate means to vary from the code section. Provide clarity in the code as to what can be modified and what requires a variance. For example, can a new public road be modified via the modification process outside the PUD? *Specific review of the modification criteria used for Design Districts. There are 11 evaluation criteria and it seems to conflict with the intent of the code design where the standards doesn’t have to be met if the intent and the guidelines are complied with. See the beginning of the code section 4-3-100. RMC4-4-070.R requires a variance to deviate from the provisions of the Landscaping Regulations. A modification process should also be available for minor departures from Code. Construction & Demolition Materials Diversion King County has adopted construction and waste diversion regulations (i.e., which materials may be transported to a dump vs. which materials are required to be recycled); however, their regulations are only in effect within incorporated areas once the materials leave the jobsite (i.e., once on a public road regardless of jurisdiction). King County has requested cities adopt their diversion regulations so there is consistency and more recyclable materials are transported to the appropriate facility. SEPA Amendments Amend SEPA Authority to reference 4 members, instead of 3. Add ERC’s role to NEPA. Update SEPA regulations to be consistent with newly adopted state laws including public notice requirements to eliminate the publication requirement. Add CMZ to the inapplicable exemptions. RMC 4-8-070, Review Authority. Binding Site Plan is not listed under any of the approving authorities. They can be either administrative or Hearing Examiner. Site Plan Review Update criteria for site plan review modification. The criteria does not address building design or the design district criteria. This can result in a project receiving site plan review approval with a particular design and a complete new building and site plan can be submitted without the requirement to go through the public comment process. Design Requirements for Assisted Living and Convalescent Care Facilities Located in Residential Zones As the code is drafted both of these uses can be placed in low density residential zones with bonus density, however these uses do not have any requirement to comply with residential design standards and/or commercial design standards to help these large scale facilities fit into the small scale residential character of low density residential zones. Review Conditional Use Permit Criteria Consider increasing height in CD Zone Consider height and bonus density Update Stream Classification Stream reclassification for Maplewood Creek Subarea stream based on biological assessments. Copperwood Preliminary Plat resulted in a reclassification of a stream that needs to be adopted as a part of the Stream Classification Map. Remapping of contiguous open space corridor Reclass a stream from Class 4 to Class 3 for the Roman Short Plat Based on recommendations from the Muckleshoot Tribe’s Northwest Indian Fisheries Commission, review the City’s stream classification against the State and WDFW, ensure consistency between our AGENDA ITEM #2. a) classification and the states. Temporary Use Permit Criteria for Wireless Facilities Update TUPs to have specific criteria for wireless facilities. Lessons learned from a recent Public Works and Civil Construction Permits Add language in Title 4 that defines applicability, process procedures, and expiration for Public Works and Civil Construction Permits (i.e. right of way use permits, civil construction permits, utility permits, etc.). Clarify language in Title 9-2 to define the procedures, requirements, and allowed use under a right of way use permit (short time use of right of way) and a revocable right of way use permit (long term use of right of way). In addition, define specialized right-of-way use permits for uses such as food trucks and sidewalk cafes. Housekeeping Chapter by chapter review of the code which includes: Eliminate reference to Comprehensive Plan’s Community Design Element in RMC 4-9-250D. Modification Procedures Remove references to 4-1-170 and others as identified ADU Review Review regulations and rules for ADUs. Consider streamlining process and design/development regulations associated with them. Also consider the fee structure of impact fees, permit fees, and utility fees. Outdoor Storage The code is ambiguous regarding what is considered outside storage and where it is or is not appropriate. Additionally, regulations for “Bulk Storage Facilities” constitute a large portion of our code, yet have not been needed in 2 decades. Should we consider streamlining if not eliminating these storage-related regulations? Authority and Criteria for Phasing Large Scale Projects Identify authority and criteria to require phasing for large scale projects. R-10 and R-14 Open Space Requirements There is ambiguity and inconsistency in the Common Open Space Standards of RMC 4-2-115. The minimum dimension for open space is 20 ft. which is the same as the pedestrian access easement dimension. Staff should consider if the 20 ft. dimension is appropriate for common open space and/or pedestrian access easement. These two items should have a distinct difference in the code, whereas today they are the same. Design District for the CO Zone Consider adding the CO zone to a design district to ensure development in this zone is held to the same standards as other commercial development. Auto Mall Area B Review the boundaries of Auto Mall Area B. Impact Fee Credit Add a maximum amount of time in which a new development can claim impact fee credit from a previously existing use on the site once that use has either stopped operations and/or has been removed for demolished. Administrative Code Interpretations (from December 2018 to Current) CI-149, Downtown Window Transparency CI-150, Preschool and Daycare Permissibility AGENDA ITEM #2. a)