HomeMy WebLinkAboutRES 2816 RESOLUTION NO. 2816
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE
CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON
ACCEPTING GRANT FUNDS TO IMPLEMENT THE
GROWTH MANAGEMENT ACT OF 1990
WHEREAS, the 1990 Washington State Legislature passed an Act
dealing with Growth Management (HB 2929) which requires all
jurisdictions in King County to prepare comprehensive plans
consistent with new guidelines; and
WHEREAS, the Act requires that jurisdictions prepare these
plans in cooperation with their neighbors and with King County; and
WHEREAS, the Act assigns near term deadlines for the
completion of (1) an inventory and regulations for the protection
of resource lands and critical areas, (2) a process to identify an
urban growth area, and (3) an assessment of land use data
collection needs; and
WHEREAS, the Legislature appropriated $7.4 million dollars for
each year of the 1989-1991 biennium to assist the Department of
Community Development and local governments to comply with and
implement the Act; and
WHEREAS, the Department of Community Development will provide
approximately $2 . 1 million dollars to a consortium of general
purpose governments in King County provided that 60% of those
governments representing 75% of the county's population agree to
the grant distribution formula and to jointly develop and
- 1 -
RESOLUTION NO. 2816
cooperatively implement a work program; and
WHEREAS, a technical committee of representatives from City
of Seattle, King County and Suburban Cities have prepared a draft
work program (Attachment A) , and a grant distribution formula
(Attachment B) ;
NOW THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RENTON HEREBY
RESOLVES as follows:
Section 1. The above findings have been found to be true
and correct.
Section 2 . To be eligible for a share of the Growth
Management Act grant funds, the City agrees to:
a. Designate the King County Planning Directors as the group
which will manage the completion of the work program, receive
regular briefings on the activities and progress of the technical
forums, and coordinate preparation of the annual reports to the
State Department of Community Development (Attachment C) .
b. Send a representative to, and actively participate in a
technical forum to accomplish the work program (Attachment A) ,
specifically, the inventory and protection of resources and
critical areas, the designation of an urban growth area, and
creation of a countywide data sharing group.
C. The grant distribution formula (Attachment B) , which is
that every general purpose government in King County will receive
a base amount of $35, 000. 00 plus a per capital allocation based on
the jurisdiction's proportional share of total county population.
d. Designation of King County as the jurisdiction that will
2 -
RESOLUTION NO. 2816
accept the grant funds from the Department of Community Development
and disburse and administer those funds consistent with the
provisions of this resolution including attachments.
e. Submit a short written description of a high priority
project which is unique to this City and upon which the
jurisdiction intends to begin work in this funding year (September
1, 1990 to July 1, 1991) .
f. Complete the Growth Management Needs Assessment and
return it to the State Department of Community Development by
January 1, 1991, with a copy to the King County Planning Division.
RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Renton, Washington
this 24th day of September, 1990.
APPROVED:
� f
MAYOR
ATTEST/AUTHENTICATED:
1)2"
City Cle
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
City Attorney
B. 1. 12 . 55
3 -
�tNI CST UCI'I Vr VVIVIMUINIIT UCV+ O-L4-yU r y•LOAM t VlIT VT- FCUCnML WMT'' VlIT Vf RCINIVIN tM 0
RESOLUTION NO.- 2816
"ATTACHMENT A"
WORK PRPR99M M_
Each of the following work items will include a citizen
participation/community involvement element. Consistent with
section 14 of the Growth Ma nageXaent Act, the Technical Forums,
Planning. Directors Association, and the various uriedietions
will establish procedures for disseminating information,
involving citizens and ;interest groups, - and considering
alternatives. These procedures will be identified in a detailed
scope 'of work developed for each technical. forum.
RESOURCE AND CRITICAL LANDS TECHNICAL FORUM
' SHB 2929 requires that King County, and each city
within King County, designate natural resource lands and critical
areas within their respective jurisdictions. The County and each
city must then adopt development regulations to assure the
conservation of resource lands, and to preclude land uses or }
development that
cis ompleted latedpbyible with Septembercl.,�tl9gi.tical areas. These
actions must P
Og C To facilitate and coordinate the designation and
regulation of natural resource lands and critical areas by King
county and each city within King county, as required by sections
5 and 17 , SHB 2929 .
A TC TONL King County and the cities of King county will
establish and participate in a Resource and critical. Lands
Technical Forum charged with carrying out this objective. The
Technioal Forum will undertake the following activities:
1. Seek consensus on a common or compatible approach to the
criteria for designation and regulation of both natural
resource lands and critical areas.
2 . Coordinate designation, mapping and other issues relating
to the political boundaries between jurisdictions.
3 . Exchange ideas, experiences and expertise and relating to
the designation and regulation of natural resource lands
and critical. areas.
4 . Explore the joint use of consultants, data and other
resources among jurisdictions.
5. Coordinate with the designation and regulation efforts of
Snohomish and fierce counties.
g, periodically brief elected officials through established
intergovernmental forums.
VLIYI VI rVLl it VI VVlrllrlVIY11 1 VLI r V 11 4V 1 V LT 111 1 VA I I VI 1 Vv�l1/1111t1 vi l I vl r� r vii n -r
RESOLUTION NO. 28.16 FrAttac "' t ea
E Each jurisdiction will adopt regulation
s whichure lroduce
a coordinated and compatible system of u
and
critical areas throughout King County by September 1, 1991.
URBAN GROWTH AREAS DESIGNATION
AAgKGR-Q2M.L SHE 2929 requires that by July 1, 19911 King County
begin consulting with each city regarding the location of an
, Urban Growth Area. ' Urban Growth Areas must include areas and
ected
densities sufficient to permit the urban growth that is prof
to. occur in King county over a twenty year period. Due to the
complexity of urban growth issues, ongoing planning efforts and
other consideration, it is imperative that the County and cities
begin work on growth areas ,immediately. A cooperative effort
will ensure that the legitimate interests of all jurisdictions
are considered in the ultiTnate designations.
OB 10T1yZ1, To fosteriibasetupon� n and
whi.cheKingoCounty Urban
provide an accurate information
Growth Area decisions will be made.
c ort • The urban/rural boundary of the King county '
Comprehensive Plan, together with the land use, development and
urban service policies of the County and cities, will provide the
basis upon' which Urban Growth Area decisions will be made. The
first step toward Making these decisions will be to determine the
growth capacity of the county and cities, based on existing plans
and policies and on criteria established for urban Growth Areas. .
King County and the .citi.es of King County will:
1. Establish and participate in an Urban Growth Area
Technical Forum, which will seek consensus on criteria,
methodologies and format tused
andyemploymentCounty
growthacYr
city to estimate their population
capacities.
2 . ' Each city and the County will estimate their own
capacities for population and employment growth, based
upon a. ) local plans and policies and b. ) consistent with
agreed to criteria, methodologies and format.
3 . The- Urban Growth Area Technical Forum will compile the
capacity estimates ,prepared by King County jurisdictions
for purposes of evaluating the countywide Urban Growth
Area.
4 . As s second priority, the Urban Growth Area Technical
Forum will take initial 'steps toward delineation of Urban
Growth Areas. This effort will be undertaken ro liag�� of
SHB 2029 's recognition that cities are the apP p
providers of urban government services. This effort will
also recognize and support King County' s ongoing efforts
to refine the existing urban/rural boundary through the
vLii W I616 I. V1 VVi•iinVirii 1 616VV v 6T VV i V •6..Vn1q 1 Vii i V1 i 6.611.1%M6. VVM1 Vii 1 V1 1%"141V11 'W v
RESOL'U'TION N0. 2816 ## t tl18 All C � E3cY
adoption and updating of Community Plans. Initial steps
Will include:
a. Seeking consensus on criteria to guide decisions on
the future boundaries of King county' s cities
Decision-making criteria should include such issues
as development densities, efficient urban services
prevision and timing of annexation.
b. Identifying and mapnthere�is noturban agx�eementth
Areas and areae where
c. IdentifnQnk��banelements'
Growthof a Areas�ocess for achieving
agreement
d. King County will work, directly with cities in
establishing Urban Growth Areas according to the
following sequence:
Cities in areas of .community Planning projects in progress
and cities' near or bordering rural areas/unincorporated
areas:
1991: Auburn, Kent, Renton, Redmond, Bothell,
Kirkland, Snoqualmie Valley, Enumclaw, Bellevue.
1992 : Issaquah, Black Diamond.,
Cities in western King County urban area, not near
rural designation areas or not bordering
unincorporated areas (e.g. Desi Moines, Tukwila.,
Federal. Way) :
1992 : All. remaining cities.
o UgTgl
1, Estimate of countywide population and employment growth
capacity, based on existing plans and policies by July 1,
1991.
2 . Process for d.elinaating and agreeing to Urban Growth
Areas, by July if 1991.
3 . Map(s) identifying agreed-to UrbanGot Areas and
highlighting areas where there e agreement,
September 1,1991.
4 . Urban Growth Area designations by end of 1992 .
KING COUNTY COMPREHENSIVE PLAN REGIONAL GOALS CHAPTER
BA The current Icing County Comprehensive Plan was
adoptQd in 1985. 'King County has recently initiated a major
RESOLUTION NO. 2816 tshttaCh a G+ { ued/dace .A
review -of that plan, and has taken steps to solicit the active
involvement of all local jurisdiction$. This involvement is
especially important in light of the coordination and consistency
requirements of SH 2929 .
oBJ TXVE: To promote coordination and consistency
ybetween the
King County Comprehensive Plan and then planning cother
County, local jurisdictions through the King County Comprehensive
Flan review process.
ACTIONS The Resolution of the suburban Cities Association of
King County Regarding Priorities -of the 1990 review of the King
County Comprehensive Plan (adopted May 9, 1990, will provide the
starting point for a joint effort to review, maintain and
strengthen the regional policies of' the 1985 King County
Comprehensive Plan. King County will continue to actively
involve cities in the review and refinement of goals and policies
having regional import. The cities will actively participate in
the Comprehensive plan Review, through the King County Suburban
Cities Association and, where appropriate, through direct
involvement and discussions with the County. At a minimum, each
city will be responsible for identifying any conflict or
inconsistency between their own plans and policies, and any
proposed regional policies for King County. Cities should also
make suggestions for resolving any such conflict or
inconsistency.
RROD CTs:_ Adopt updated, strengthened and coordinated regional
goals and policies for the King County Comprehensive Plan and
City Comprehensive Flans by the end of 1991.
GROWTH MANAGEMENT DATA SHARING GROUP
BACKGRO NDt, Successful implementation of SHB 2929 will depend
upon a high level of cooperation and coordination among local
jurisdictions. Such coordination is currently hampered by a lack
of comparable land use and development data from jurisdiction to
jurisdiction.
0SJgQT1M To share land use and development . data and work
toward common methods of compiling and reporting information.
g ITIrdu First year activities will involve consultation
between the cities and the County on standardization of
references.
PRODUCTS:
1. Identify and compare data collection andtabulation
systems used by each jurisdiction, by July It 1991-
2 . Identify common data needs by July 1, 199 .•
RESOLUTION NO. 2816
_"Attach rr OIi 6 e
3 . Agree to a common format for collecting and tabulating
common data needs by September. l,, 199.1.
WORK PROGRAMS FOR INDIVIDUAL KING COUNTY JURISDICTIONS
Each adopting jurisdiction is to provide a paragraph describing
an individual multi-year work -program designed to implement SHB
2929 . The focus of the work program should be on activities to
be completed July 1r 1990 to duly jr 1991 with highlights for the
years 1992, 1993 , 1994 . Milestones and timelines are the two 'key
words in completing this requirement as they will be used as the
basis for measuring progress and disbursing funds during this
first year.
RESOLUTION NO. 2816
A!lACHXIX! B
GROMIb t{AIICiXII! ACr 2UIDIXG
08121(90
IDID1 IYIILIBLt $7,480,160 III; COUl!!
RIGIOIIL ILLOCAlIOI
DOI MIrLAIDS IUXDIIG ($3)3,611) ($)5,060+peren t) $2,146,692
COUIlY HOLDOUr (S CO0Ir1ISJ (SSg0,046)
1989 POPDLIIION 1,482,860
PDAD8 M ILIBLI l0 RIGIOIS 14,426,580 PIRCII! 01 RIGIOXAL POPULIlIOI 39,911
41798,100 $1111 POPULAri0I CirilS 31
3,115,680 POPULIIIOI 01 111 15 RIGIOXB GROMrl Rltt 14,371
....................................................................... ..................................
l0rt; HS! AHOUII I8 IOR OII PLAIIIRICOIEUL1111 ?OR OXI 111R,
...........................................................................................---------
PIR CAPIII
OH DISIVICTiOII
1910 1948 POPULAI'IOI 18 IIAR tilt II31D OR
IURISOI;rIOR POPULA!I01 POPU 0101 PIRCM GROVIR RIrI Mull I OI RIGIOI 10%
ALCOMI 1467 1,726 0.121 111251 ;35,060 $1,279 $36,219
HIM 26417 34,110 2.301 29,271 135,080 ►25,389 160,389
ti1UI AXIS 321 294 6421 -10,371 $35,000 $219 135,214
BILLIYUb 73903 81190 $1991 20.281 335,000 $66,085 $141,005
BLACK DIACOID 1170 1,510 8,181 291061 $35,406 $1,123 $36,123
WEILL (PARI) °" 7943 11,500 0,781 44,781 $33,066 10,11@ 542,416
CARIAlIOX 951 1,255 0.081 311911 135,000 $933 135,933
CLYDI; HILL 3229 3890 01211 •4,381 135,400 $2,297 $31,291
DIS MOTHS 137E 15,490 11041 109,931 135,060 $11,516 $46,516
DUYALL 729 2,435 0.161 234.621 =351400 $1,810 $36101@
IMCLAW 5427 6,390 0.431 17.741 $351606 $4,751 539,751
IIDIRAL MIT 63,980 4,311 14,371 $35,100 $41,565 $12,565
BUIls POI6l 413 464 01031 4135t 135,040 1375 $35,375
ISSIQUAH 5536 7,390 0.501 33,491 135,000 15,494 $401494
lilt 22961 37,446 21521 63,061 135,400 127,135 $62,835
IIRG COUIrY 503363 514,834 34.121 2,211 $35,040 $382,750 $417,750
I1RK1.1ID 18779 37,700 2,541 190;161 $35,000 $28,028 $63,628
LIKI )OR911i PARK 2485 2108 0,191 12,681 135,440 $2,082 $31,002
XIDIXA 3221 2,964 01201 -8.471 135,400 $2,261 $37,261
XIRCIR ISLAXD 21522 20,630 1.311 -4.141 135,10@ 115,331 150,337
XILIOX (?ARl) "' 211 565 4,041 159,17% 14,449 $426 $4,869
IORM DY PARC 4268 6620 0,/5t - 55,111 $35,448 $4,922 $39,922
NORTH BRAD 1701 2,420 01161 42,271 135,044 $1,799 636,799
PACIIIC 2241 4,614 0.281 84.451 $35,008 $3,033 638,033
RIDYORD 23318 35,420 21391 51,961 $35,000 526,333 $61,333
RIIIOX 30612 39,340 2,651 28,511 135,060 $21,247 $64,247
SIArAC 24,000 1 621 14,371 $35,010 $17,143 02,843
SIAMI I 4!3846 501,800 33,041 1 611 135,440 $313,140 $448,060
SITIONISH 209 243 4,021 16,271 $35,000 1181 $35,161
E104UALXII 1370 1,545 0,161 12.771 $35,008 $1,149 $36,149
1UH M 3578 10,824 0.731 202,44135 000
YARROW POitir 1071 985 4.071 -8.141 $ $8,044 $43,044
135,000 $732 135,732
32 1,482,800 $1,148,315 11,102,377 $2,194,692
BO!8I1L ARD KILPOI MILL RICIIYI A I WOR1101AII SRARI 01 181 8I81 AXOOI,
101BILL'S SHRI is 96,761 KILrOX'S 1IARt IS 12,711
RESOLUTION NO. 2816
ATTACHMENT "C"
GOVERNMENTAL FRAMEWORK
For approximately the past five years, the general purpose governments in
King County have been working more cooperatively to resolve land use and
service delivery issues. The Solid Waste Interlocal Forum and the Eastside
Transportation Forum are two examples of effective regional problem solving
groups in this area. Building on the success of these and other groups, the
county's general purpose governments have been discussing the creation of a
more formal COUNTYWIDE PLANNING COUNCIL "to assure coordination,
consensus, consistency and compliance" among local governments as they
implement the Growth Aianagement Act and adopt comprehensive planning
policies to be applied countywide. Decisions on the formation of a countywide
planning council and other strategies for local coordination and cooperation
are anticipated during Fall 1990 and Winter 1991 .
In the interim, the general purpose governments in this county have agreed'
to designate the King County Planning Directors Association as an appropriate
forum for discussing issues, exchanging information, promoting
standardization and consistency, encouraging cooperation and providing
technical assistance. The directors have been functioning in this capacity for
several years with considerable success The group meets regularly each
month, attracts planning directions from City of Seattle, King County, and
from most of the suburban cities and small towns in the county.
RESOLUTION NO. 2816
WORK PROGRAM FOR THE CITY OF RENTON
The City of Renton intends to perform the following tasks to
implement SHB 2929 :
Dec. 31, 1990 -Identify land use and development data
needs.
July 1, 1991 - Complete critical areas inventory.
Sept. 1, 1991 - Adopt critical areas ordinance.
Dec. 31, 1991 - Adopt comprehensive plan.
1992 - Adopt urban growth area in cooperation with
surrounding jurisdictions.
1993 - Revise all capital facilities plans to conform
with comprehensive plan.