Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutORD 5779CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON ORDINANCE NO. 5779 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON, AMENDING SECTION 4-1-160 OF CHAPTER 1, ADMINISTRATION AND ENFORCEMENT, OF TITLE IV (DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS) OF THE RENTON MUNICIPAL CODE, SETTING THE IMPACT FEE AT $4,635 PER NEW SINGLE-FAMILY HOME AND $1,534 PER NEW MULTI -FAMILY IN THE ISSAQUAH SCHOOL DISTRICT; SETTING THE IMPACT FEE AT $4,990 PER NEW SINGLE FAMILY HOME AND $2,163 PER NEW MULTI -FAMILY HOME IN THE KENT SCHOOL DISTRICT; SETTING THE IMPACT FEE AT $5,643 PER NEW SINGLE FAMILY HOME AND $1,385 PER NEW MULTI- FAMILY HOME IN THE RENTON SCHOOL DISTRICT; AND ADOPTING THE CAPITAL FACILITIES PLANS OF THE ISSAQUAH, KENT AND RENTON SCHOOL DISTRICTS. WHEREAS, under Section 4-1-160 of Chapter 1, Administration and Enforcement, of Title IV (Development Regulations), of the Renton Municipal Code, as amended, and the maps and reports adopted in conjunction therewith, the City of Renton has heretofore collected on behalf of the Issaquah School District an impact fee of $4,560 for each new single-family home and $1,458 for each new multi -family unit built within the District's boundaries; and WHEREAS, the Issaquah School District requested that the City of Renton adopt the District's 2015 Capital Facilities Plan, which includes an increase in the impact fee for new single-family homes to $4,635 and an increase in the impact fee for new multi -family units to $1,534; and WHEREAS, under Section 4-1-160 of Chapter 1, Administration and Enforcement, of Title IV (Development Regulations), of the Renton Municipal Code, as amended, and the maps and reports adopted in conjunction therewith, the City of Renton has heretofore collected on behalf of the Kent School District an impact fee of $5,486 for each new single-family home and $3,378 for each new multi -family unit built within the District's boundaries; and 1 ORDINANCE NO. 5779 WHEREAS, the Kent School District requested that the City of Renton adopt the District's 2015/2016 — 2020/2021 Capital Facilities Plan, which requests a decrease in the impact fee for new single-family homes to $4,990 and a decrease in the impact fee for new multi -family units to $2,163; and WHEREAS, under Section 4-1-160 of Chapter 1, Administration and Enforcement, of Title IV (Development Regulations), of the Renton Municipal Code, as amended, and the maps and reports adopted in conjunction therewith, the City of Renton has heretofore collected on behalf of the Renton School District an impact fee of $5,541 for each new single-family home and $1,360 for each new multi -family unit built within the District's boundaries; and WHEREAS, the Renton School District requested that the City of Renton adopt the District's 2015-2021 Capital Facilities Plan, which includes an increase in the impact fee for new single-family homes to $5,643, and increase in the impact fee for multi -family units to $1,385; NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON, DOES ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS: SECTION I. Subsection 4-1-160.D.5 of subsection 4-1-160.D, Fee Calculations, of Chapter 1, Administration and Enforcement, of Title IV (Development Regulations) of the Renton Municipal Code, is hereby amended as follows: 5. The City Council may adjust the fee calculated under this subsection, as it sees fit to take into account local conditions such as, but not limited to, price differentials throughout each respective school district in the cost of new housing, school occupancy levels, and the percent of each school 2 ORDINANCE NO. 5779 district's Capital Facilities Budget, which will be expended locally. The City Council establishes the following fees: Single Family Fee Amount Multi -Family and Accessory Dwelling Unit Fee Amount Issaquah School District $ 4,5 6 9. 00- 4 635 1 534 Kent School District $5,48&.00- 4 990 $3,378-00- 2 163 Renton School District $5,`�-�41.00-5 643 $1,369,00- 1 385 SECTION II. Subsection 4-1-16011 of subsection 4-1-160.J, Adoption of Each School District's Capital Facilities Plan and Submission of the Annual Updates and Report and Data, of Chapter 1, Administration and Enforcement of Title IV (Development Regulations) of the Renton Municipal Code, is hereby amended as follows: 1. Renton adopts the following capital facilities plans by reference as part of the Capital Facilities Element of Renton's Comprehensive Plan: Plan; a. The Issaquah School District No. 411 2914 2015 Capital Facilities b. The Kent School District No. 415 2014¢201S 2019�2^'^ 2015/2016 — 2020/2021 Capital Facilities Plan; and c. The Renton School District No. 403 2914-2029 2015 — 2021 Capital Facilities Plan. 3 ORDINANCE NO. 5779 SECTION III. This ordinance shall be effective upon its passage, approval and five (5) days after its publication. PASSED BY THE CITY COUNCIL this 23rd day of November , 2015. (I a''t ` �' Jason A. t eth, City Jerk APPROVED BY THE MAYOR this 23rd day of November , 2015. )'U� 1'&2� Deni Law, Mayor Approved as to form: Lawrence J. Warren, City Attorney Date of Publication: 11/27/2015 (summary) ORD:1892:10/20/15:scr �G SEAL, � r_ 4 2015 Capital Facilities Plan Issaquah ►School District No. 411 Issaquah, Washington Adopted August 12, 2015 .resolution No. I057 The Issaquah School District No. 411 hereby provides this Capital Facilities Plan documenting present and future school facility requirements of the District. The plan contains all elements required by the Growth Management Act and King County Council Ordinance 21 A. TABLE OF CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY.............................................................................................................1 STANDARD OF SERVICE...........................................................,........................................2 TRIGGER OF CONSTRUCTION........................................................... ,..................................... 3 DEVELOPMENTTRACKING......................................................................................................4 NEED FOR IMPACT FEES ................................... ....................................................... .............. , 5 EXISTING AND FUTURE CAPACITY NEEDS .........,..... ................................ ........ .................. ,. 6 ENROLLMENT METHODOLOGY.............................................,................................. ..... 7 TABLE #1: ACTUAL STUDENT COUNTS 2006-2007 - 2014-2015 AND ENROLLMENT PROJECTIONS 2015-2016 - 2029-2030........................................ 8 TABLE #2: STUDENT FACTORS - SINGLE FAMILY............................................................... 9 TABLE #3: STUDENT FACTORS - MULTI FAMILY...............................................................10 INVENTORY AND EVALUATION OF CURRENT FACILITIES................................................11 SITELOCATION MAP...............................................................................................................12 SIX -YEAR CONSTRUCTION PLAN..........................................................................................13 TABLE #4: PROJECTED CAPACITY TO HOUSE STUDENTS..............................................14 SINGLE AND MULTI FAMILY IMPACT FEE CALCULATIONS................................................15 BASIS FOR DATA USED IN SCHOOL IMPACT FEE CALCULATIONS ..... ............................. 16 APPENDIX A: 2014-2015 ELEMENTARY CAPACITIES..........................................................17 APPENDIX B: 2014-2015 MIDDLE SCHOOL CAPACITIES.....................................................18 APPENDIX C: 2014-2015 HIGH SCHOOL CAPACITIES.........................................................19 APPENDIX D: 2014-2015 TOTAL CAPACITIES.......................................................................20 APPENDIX E: SIX -YEAR FINANCE PLAN..............................................................................21 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY This Six -Year Capital Facilities Plan (the "Plan") has been prepared by the Issaquah School District (the "district") as the district's primary facility planning document, in compliance with the requirements of Washington's Growth Management Act and King County Council Code Title 21A. This Plan was prepared using data available in March, 2015. This Plan is an update of prior long-term Capital Facilities Plans adopted by the Issaquah School District. However, this Plan is not intended to be the sole Plan for all of the District's needs. The District may prepare interim and periodic Long Range Capital Facilities Plans consistent with board policies, taking into account a longer or a shorter time period, other factors and trends in the use of facilities, and other needs of the District as may be required. Any such plan or plans will be consistent with this Six -Year Capital Facilities Plan. In June 1992, the District first submitted a request to King County to impose and to collect school impact fees on new developments in unincorporated King County. On November 16, 1992, the King County Council first adopted the District's Plan and a fee implementing ordinance. This Plan is the annual update of the Six -Year Plan. King County and the cities of Issaquah, Renton, Bellevue, Newcastle and Sammamish collect impact fees on behalf of the District. All of these jurisdictions provide exemptions from impact fees for senior housing and certain low-income housing. Pursuant to the requirements of the Growth Management Act, this Plan will be updated on an annual basis, and any charges in the fee schedule(s) adjusted accordingly. - 1 - STANDARD OF SERVICE School facility and student capacity needs are dictated by the types and amounts of space required to accommodate the District's adopted educational program. The educational program standards which typically drive facility space needs include grade configuration, optimal facility size, class size, educational program offerings, as well as classroom utilization and scheduling requirements and use of re -locatable classroom facilities (portables). Different class sizes are used depending on the grade level or programs offered such as special education or the gifted program. With the passage of Initiative 728 in November 2000, the Issaquah School Board established new class size standards for elementary grades K-5. The Board and District Administration will continue to keep class sizes near the levels provided by 1-728; this will be done via local levy funds. There is also recently passed legislation that requires the State to fund Full -Day Kindergarten by 2018, those assumptions are not used in this analysis, but may be considered in future capital facility plans. A class size average of 20 for grades K-5 is now being used to calculate building capacities. A class size of 26 is used for grades 6-8 and 28 for grades 9-12. Special Education class size is based on 12 students per class. For the purpose of this analysis, rooms designated for special use, consistent with the provisions of King County Council Code Title 21A, are not considered classrooms. Invariably, some classrooms will have student loads greater in number than this average level of service and some will be smaller. Program demands, state and federal requirements, collective bargaining agreements, and available funding may also affect this level of service in the years to come. Due to these variables, a utilization factor of 95% is used to adjust design capacities to what a building may actually accommodate. Portables used as classrooms are used to accommodate enrollment increases for interim purposes until permanent classrooms are available. When permanent facilities become available, the portable(s) is either moved to another school as an interim classroom or removed. Legislative proposals to reduce K-3 classroom ratios to 17/1 would have a significant impact on the standard of service. A review of all elementary schools shows that 65 additional classrooms would be needed to meet the proposed 17/1 ratio. All sites are crowded, existing permanent facilities cannot house existing students and all but the most recent new school use portable classrooms to house existing students. Existing portable classrooms already burden building core facilities. Another legislative proposal would require Full -Day Kindergarten for all kindergarten students. This proposal would require an additional 23 classrooms distributed among all elementary schools. Combined, these legislative proposals would require an additional 88 elementary school classrooms. The King County decision to no longer allow schools to be build outside the Urban Growth Boundary Line (UGBL) means District owned property planned for a new elementary school and middle school cannot be used. The State does not provide funding for property purchases and the District does not have funding for any property purchases at this point in time. Approved Bond funding does not include new capacity projects to meet the additional housing needs of the Full Day Kindergarten or 17/1 classroom ratio legislative proposals, and only includes capacity for projected near term growth. -2- TRIGGER OF CONSTRUCTION The Issaquah School District Capital Facilities Plan proposes the rebuild/expansion of two elementary schools, adding classrooms to one high school and a rebuild/expansion of Issaquah Middle School to meet the needs of elementary, middle school and high school capacity needs. Planning the need for new schools is triggered by comparing our enrollment forecasts with our permanent capacity figures. These forecasts are by grade level and, to the extent possible, by geography. The analysis provides a list of new construction needed by school year. The decision on when to construct a new facility involves factors other than verified need. Funding is the most serious consideration. Factors including the potential tax rate for our citizens, the availability of state funds and impact fees, the ability to acquire land, and the ability to pass bond issues determine when any new facility can be constructed. The planned facilities will be funded by a bond passed on April 17, 2012, school impact fees and reserve funds held by the District. New school facilities are a response to new housing which the county or cities have approved for construction. The District's Six -Year Finance Plan is shown in Appendix E found on page 21. -3- DEVELOPMENT TRACKING In order to increase the accuracy and validity of enrollment projections, a major emphasis has been placed on the collection and tracking data of known new housing developments. This data provides two useful pieces of planning information. First, it is used to determine the actual number of students that are generated from a single family or multi -family residence. It also provides important information on the impact new housing developments will have on existing facilities and/or the need for additional facilities. Developments that have been completed or are still selling houses are used to forecast the number of students who will attend our school from future developments. District wide statistics show that new single-family homes currently generate 0.473 elementary student, 0.173 middle school student, 0.150 high school student, for a total of 0.795 school aged student per single- family residence (see Table 2). New multi -family housing units currently generate 0.156 elementary student, 0.051 middle school student, 0.049 high school student, for a total of 0.256 school aged student per residence (see Table 3). -4- NEED FOR IMPACT FEES Impact fees and state matching funds have not been a reliable source of revenue. Because of this, the Issaquah School District asked its voters on February 7, 2006 to fund the construction of an elementary school, one middle school, expand Maywood Middle School, expand Liberty High School, and rebuild Issaquah High School. District voters also approved on April 17, 2012 ballot measure that provides funding to expand two elementary schools, rebuild/expand two additional elementary schools, add classrooms to one high school and rebuild/expand one middle school. Due to the high cost of land and the limited availability of a parcel large enough to accommodate a middle school program, the School Board reallocated the moneys designated to build the middle school to expand the capacity of Issaquah and Skyline high schools. As demonstrated in Appendix A, (page 17) the District currently has a permanent capacity (at 100%) to serve 7476 students at the elementary level. Appendix B, (page 18) shows a permanent capacity (at 100%) for 3954 students at the middle school level Appendix C (page 19) shows a permanent capacity (at 100%) of 5400 students at the high school level. Current enrollment is identified on page 8. The District elementary projected Oct 2015 headcount is 9152. Adjusting permanent capacity by 95% leaves the District's elementary enrollment over permanent capacity at the elementary level by 1676 students (Appendix A). At the middle school level, the projected Oct 2015 headcount is 4612. This is 658 students over permanent capacity (Appendix B). At the high school level the district is over permanent capacity by 8 students (Appendix C). Based upon the District's student generation rates, the District expects that .795 student will be generated from each new single family home in the District and that .256 student will be generated from each new multi -family dwelling unit. Applying the enrollment projections contained on page 8 to the District's existing permanent capacity (Appendices A, B, and C) and if no capacity improvements are made by the year 2020- 21, and permanent capacity is adjusted to 95%, the District elementary population will be over its permanent capacity by 2055 students, at the middle school level by 855 students, and will be over its permanent capacity by 261 at the high school level. The District's enrollment projections are developed using two methods: first, the cohort survival — historical enrollment method is used to forecast enrollment growth based upon the progression of existing students in the District; then, the enrollment projections are modified to include students anticipated from new developments in the District. -5- To address existing and future capacity needs, the District's six -year construction plan includes the following capacity projects: Facility Projected Additional Expansions Completion Date Location Capacity PCMS Portables 2015 Issaquah 56 Clark Elementary 2017 Issaquah 244 Clark - Portables 2015 Issaquah 80 Sunny Hills El 2016 Sammamish 248 Newcastle El Portables 2015 Newcastle 40 Issaquah Middle 2016 Issaquah 332 Maywood Middle 2016 Renton 156 Tiger Mtn. Com. HS 2016 Issaquah 120 Issaquah HS Portables 2015 Issaquah 112 Skyline HS Portables 2015 Sammamish 112 Based upon the District's capacity data and enrollment projections, as well as the student generation data, the District has determined that a majority of its capacity improvements are necessary to serve students generated by new development. The school impact fee formula ensures that new development only pays for the cost of the facilities necessitated by new development. The fee calculations examine the costs of housing the students generated by each new single family dwelling unit or each new multi -family dwelling unit and then reduces that amount by the anticipated state match and future tax payments. The resulting impact fee is then discounted further. Thus, by applying the student generation factor to the school project costs, the fee formula only calculates the costs of providing capacity to serve each new dwelling unit. The formula does not require new development to contribute the costs of providing capacity to address existing needs. The King County Council and the City Councils of the Cities of Bellevue, Issaquah, Newcastle, Renton and Sammamish have created a framework for collecting school impact fees and the District can demonstrate that new developments will have an impact on the District. The impact fees will be used in a manner consistent with RCW 82.02.050 - .100 and the adopted local ordinances. Engrossed Senate Bill 5923, enacted in the 2015 Legislative Session, requires that developers be provided an option to defer payment of impact fees to final inspection, certificate of occupancy, or closing, with no fees deferred longer than 18 months from building permit issuance. The District adopts the positions that: (1) no school impact fee should be collected later than the earlier of final inspection or 18 months from the time of building permit issuance; and (2) no developer applicant should be permitted to defer payment of school impact fees for more than 20 dwelling units in a single year. The District's recent and ongoing student growth, coupled with the need for the timely funding and construction of new facilities to serve this growth, requires strict adherence to this position. W-V ENROLLMENT METHODOLOGY Two basic techniques are used, with the results compared, to establish the most likely range of anticipated student enrollment: 1. The student 3-2-1 cohort survival method. Examine Issaquah School District enrollments for the last 5 years and determine the average cohort survival for the consecutive five- year period. Because cohort survival does not consider students generated from new development it is a conservative projection of actual enrollment. For the same reason, these projections are also slow to react to actual growth. 2. Based on information from King County, realtors, developers, etc., seek to establish the number of new dwelling units that will be sold each year. The new dwelling units are converted to new students based on the following: a) The number of actual new students as a percentage of actual new dwellings for the past several years. b) Determine the actual distribution of new students by grade level for the past several years, i.e., 5% to kindergarten, 10% to first grade, 2% to 11th grade, etc. c) Based on an examination of the history shown by (a) and (b) above, establish the most likely factor to apply to the projected new dwellings. After determining the expected new students, the current actual student enrollments are moved forward from year to year with the arrived at additions. One of the challenges associated with all projection techniques is that they tend to always show growth because the number of houses and the general population always increases. Enrollments, however, can and do decrease even as the population increases. The reason is as the population matures, the number of kindergartners will go down as the number of 10th graders is still increasing. To adjust for this factor, the number of school age children per dwelling is examined. When this number exceeds expectations, it is probably because the District is still assuming kindergarten growth, while the main growth is actually moving into middle school. When this happens, a reduction factor is added to kindergarten to force it to decrease even though the general population continues to grow. A precise statistical formula has not been developed to make this adjustment. After all of the projections have been made and examined, the most likely range is selected. An examination of past projections compared with actual enrollment indicates the cohorts tend to be more accurate over a ten-year time span while dwelling units tend to be more accurate over a shorter period. The probable reason is that over a ten-year period, the projections tend to average out even though there are major shifts both up and down within the period. Enrollment projections for the years 2015-2016 through 2029-2030 are shown in Table #1. Student generation factors are shown in Table #2 and #3. -7- ISSAQUAH SCHOOL DISTRICT Actual Student Counts 2006-07 Through 2014-15 Enrollment Projections 2015-16 Through 2029-30 FTE Enrollment Year K 1ST 2ND 3RD 4TH 5TH 6TH 7TH 8TH 9TH IOTH 11TH 12TH Total K-5 6-8 9-12 2006-07 532 1266 1216 1211 1268 1255 1260 1197 1250 1345 1241 1146 966 15,153 6749 3707 4698 2007-08 601 1203 1324 1227 1235 1299 1276 1271 1198 1252 1321 1131 1003 15,340 6889 3745 4707 2008-09 574 1337 1246 1345 1236 1284 1279 1258 1267 1215 1225 1235 978 15,480 7023 3804 4653 2009-10 593 1319 1351 1299 1371 1258 1286 1299 1255 1326 1171 1132 1147 15,807 7191 3840 4776 2010-11 613 1390 1355 1385 1319 1400 1268 1326 1298 1326 1333 1110 1015 16,138 7462 3892 4784 2011-12 609 1396 1423 1374 1417 1346 1407 1311 1346 1361 1319 1233 1021 16,563 7565 4064 4934 2012-13 651 1361 1467 1496 1440 1448 1362 1447 1339 1412 1353 1225 1146 17,147 7863 4148 5136 2013-14 654 1489 1414 1526 1498 1477 1462 1391 1463 1344 1404 1233 1110 17,465 8058 4316 5091 2014-15 694 1494 1552 1478 1545 1555 1512 1491 1432 1495 1352 1292 1115 18,006 8317 4435 5254 2015-16 662 1560 1539 1596 1499 1575 1565 1542 1505 1474 1486 1249 1182 18,435 8431 4612 5392 2016-17 655 1492 1608 1586 1619 1532 1586 1595 1561 1543 1465 1377 1141 18,759 8492 4742 5526 2017-18 664 1477 1544 1661 1608 1652 1544 1613 1613 1593 1533 1353 1265 19,120 8605 4771 5743 2018-19 660 1501 1525 1593 1673 1641 1663 1568 1630 1638 1582 1417 1237 19,328 8592 4862 5874 2019-20 661 1490 1547 1571 1607 1705 1652 1686 1586 1659 1627 1467 1300 19,560 8582 4924 6053 2020-21 738 1493 1538 1595 1590 1640 1717 1679 1703 1619 1649 1516 1355 19,831 8593 5099 6139 2021-22 733 1646 1541 1586 1613 1623 1651 1743 1697 1735 1609 1537 1403 20,116 8742 5091 6283 2022-23 732 1636 1694 1590 1603 1646 1634 1677 1760 1727 1724 1495 1422 20,341 8901 5071 6369 2023-24 737 1634 1684 1743 1606 1636 1657 1659 1694 1790 1716 1611 1381 20,548 9040 5010 6498 2024-25 737 1645 1682 1732 1760 1639 1647 1682 1677 1724 1780 1603 1496 20,805 9195 5007 6604 2025-26 734 1645 1693 1730 1749 1792 1650 1673 1700 1708 1714 1667 1489 20,945 9344 5023 6578 2026-27 734 1638 1693 1741 1748 1782 1803 1676 1691 1730 1697 1601 1553121,088 9336 5170 6582 2027-28 734 1639 1687 1742 1758 1780 1793 1829 1693 1721 1720 1584 14971 21,167 9339 5315 6512 2028-29 1 735 1639 1687 1735 1759 1791 1792 1818 1846 1723 1711 1607 21,312 9344 5456 6511 2029-30 1 734 1639 1687 1735 1752 1791 1802 1817 1836 1877 1713 1598 _14701 14931 21,4741 1 9338 5455 66801 15,340 15,480 15,807 16,138 16,563 17,147 17,465 18,006 18,435 18,759 19,120 19,328 19,560 19,831 20,116 20,341 20,548 20,805 20,945 21,088 21,167 6/12/2015 -8- 6/12/2015 2:12 PM STUDENT GENERATION SINGLE FAMILY STUDENTS AVERAGE PER UNIT Single Family Development � � CO, C�, A° lk! co o; A Belcara 27 27 5 1 4 10 0.185 0.037 0.148 0.370 Belvedere 82 44 19 5 4 28 0.432 0.114 0.091 0.636 Cavalia 49 49 27 8 5 40 0.551 0.163 0.102 0.816 Chestnut Estates 38 33 7 4 5 16 0.212 0.121 0.152 0.485 Claremont 91 51 8 6 2 16 0.157 0.118 0.039 0.314 Delany Park 26 26 6 2 0 8 0.231 0.077 0.000 0.308 Glencoe @ Trossachs 188 147 81 38 27 146 0.551 0.259 0.184 0.993 Heritage Estates 86 22 2 0 0 2 0.091 0.000 0.000 0.091 Issaquah Highlands 1981 1817 937 327 284 1548 0.516 0.180 0.156 0.852 Laurel Hill & Laurel Hills 2,3,4 56 56 22 9 13 44 0.393 0.161 0.232 0.786 Lawson Park 31 11 3 0 0 3 0.273 0.000 0.000 0.273 Shorelane Vistas 38 38 10 7 2 19 0.263 0.184 0.053 0.500 Talus; Bridges 64 59 4 6 8 18 0.068 0.102 0.136 0.305 Tarmigan @ Pine Ridge 30 30 8 4 7 19 0.267 0.133 0.233 0.633 TOTALS 2787 2410 1139 417 361 1917 0.473 0.173 0.150 0.795 SINGLE FAMILY Elementary K - 5 0.473 Middle School 6 - 8 0.173 High School 9 - 12 0.150 TOTAL 0.795 These developments are currently under construction or have been completed within the past five years. TABLE 2 -9- STUDENT GENERATION MULTI -FAMILY STUDENTS AVERAGE PER UNIT �a a h (b ^ry �� h Cb ^ry wm Multi -Family Development i Qo C �° co o� Alta at the Lake Condos 80 58 3 1 1 5 0.052 0.017 0.017 0.073 Copper Leaf 28 28 2 0 0 2 0.071 0.000 0.000 0.107 Issaquah Highlands 1392 1198 202 65 63 330 0.169 0.054 0.053 0.288 Lake Boren Townhomes 56 56 2 3 1 6 0.036 0.054 0.018 0.091 Totals 1556 1340 209 69 65 343 0.156 0.051 0.049 0.256 MULTI -FAMILY Elementary K-5 0.156 Middle School 6-8 0.051 High School 9-12 0.049 TOTAL 0.256 These developments are currently under construction or have been completed within the past five years. TABLE 3 - 10 - INVENTORY AND EVALUATION OF CURRENT FACILITIES Currently, using the 95% utilization factor, the District has the capacity to house 15,985 students in permanent facilities and 3,876 students in portables. The projected student enrollment for the 2015-2016 school year is expected to be 18,435 including K-5 headcount which leaves a permanent capacity deficit of 2450. Adding portable classrooms into the capacity calculations gives us a capacity of 19,861 with a surplus capacity of 1426 for the K-12 student population. Calculations of elementary, middle school and high school capacities are shown in Appendices A, B and C. Totals are shown in Appendix D. Below is a list of current facilities. These facility locations and sites are shown on the District Site Location Map on Page 12. EXISTING FACILITIES LOCATION GRADE SPAN K-5: Apollo Elementary 15025 S.E. 117th Street, Renton Briarwood Elementary 17020 S.E. 134th Street, Renton Cascade Ridge Elementary 2020 Trossachs Blvd. SE, Sammamish Challenger Elementary 25200 S.E. Klahanie Blvd., Issaquah Clark Elementary 500 Second Ave. S.E., Issaquah Cougar Ridge Elementary 4630 167th Ave. S.E., Bellevue Creekside Elementary 20777 SE 16`h Street, Sammamish Discovery Elementary 2300 228th Ave. S.E., Sammamish Endeavour Elementary 26205 SE Issaq.-Fall City Rd., Issaquah Grand Ridge Elementary 1739 NE Park Drive, Issaquah Issaquah Valley Elementary 555 N.W. Holly Street, Issaquah Maple Hills Elementary 15644 204th Ave. S.E., Issaquah Newcastle Elementary 8440 136'h Ave SE, Newcastle Sunny Hills Elementary 3200 Issaq. Pine Lake Rd. S.E., Sammamish Sunset Elementary 4229 W. Lk. Samm. Pkwy. S.E., Issaquah GRADE SPAN 6-8: Beaver Lake Middle School 25025 S.E. 32nd Street, Issaquah Issaquah Middle School 400 First Ave. S.E., Issaquah Maywood Middle School 14490 168th Ave. S.E., Renton Pacific Cascade Middle School 24635 SE Issaquah Fall City Rd, Issaquah Pine Lake Middle School 3200 228th Ave. S.E., Sammamish GRADE SPAN 9-12: Issaquah High School 700 Second Ave. S.E., Issaquah Liberty High School 16655 S.E. 136th Street, Renton Skyline High School 1122 2281h Ave. S.E., Sammamish Tiger Mountain Community H.S. 355 S.E. Evans Lane, Issaquah SUPPORT SERVICES: Administration Building 565 N.W. Holly Street, Issaquah May Valley Service Center 16404 S.E. May Valley Road, Renton Transportation Center 805 Second Avenue S.E., Issaquah Transportation Satellite 3402 228 Ave S.E., Sammamish - 11 - ISSAQUAH SCHOOL DISTRICT #411 0 Creekside ES Skyline HS SAMMAMISH 0 Discovery ES BELt EVUE H001 DISTRICT O`NunsetES Couga Ridge ES BELLEVUE J NEWCASTLE NewcaO-he El; RENTON Apollo ES RENTON Briar wood ES )OOD15TRICT rl # Liberty i S Maywoiocl I KENT SCI-400L DISTRICT 2 N Miles *'Cascade Ridge ES f Pine Lake MISS 0 Beaver l�ke S • F nny 9;Ch gerE M! ES zndea our ES 4ftclficCascMe1S- i& ISSAQUAH allsmqup vat ; ES" ,—� Issaquah MS M i9er t4i-rf Community HS --oun 1ssdquah IS,SAQOAH SCHOOL DISTRICT SNOOL)AINVE VALLEY SCHOOL DISTRICT AHOWA 01 DISTRf(.7 School Districts 6 Schools Undeveloped Site Urban Growth Area THE ISSAQUAH SCHOOL DISTRICT'S SIX -YEAR CONSTRUCTION PLAN The District's Six -Year Finance Plan is shown in Appendix E. Shown in Table #4 (page 14) is the District's projected capacity to house students, which reflects the additional facilities as noted. Voters passed a $241.87 million bond in February 2006 to fund new school construction and school expansion. Voters also approved $219 million in April 2012 to fund school construction and expansion projects. The District will expand Liberty High School and Maywood Middle School and Apollo Elementary to accommodate growth experienced in the south end of the District. In the Issaquah core area, the District will expand Clark Elementary, Issaquah Valley Elementary, Issaquah Middle School and Tiger Mountain Community High School to accommodate growth. On the Issaquah Plateau, the District will expand Sunny Hills Elementary to accommodate growth. The District does not anticipate receiving State matching funds that would reduce future bond sale amounts or be applied to new K-12 construction projects included in this Plan. The District also anticipates that it will receive $500,000 in impact fees and mitigation payments that will be applied to capital projects. The District projects 18,435 FTE students for the 2015-2016 school year and 19,831 FTE students in the 2020-2021 school year. Growth will be accommodated by the planned facilities. Per the formula in the adopted school impact fee ordinance, half of this factor is assigned to impact fees and half is the local share. -13— Projected Capacity to House Students Years 2014-15 2015-16 2016-17 2017-18 2018-19 2019-20 *Permanent Capacity 16378 16830 16830 17686 17930 17930 High School 216 120 Middle School 488 Elementary School 320 248 244 Utilization Rate @ 95% Subtotal (Sum at 95% Utilization Rate) 16068 15985 16802 17034 17034 17034 Portables @ 95% 3340 3876 3876 3876 38761 3876 Total Capacity_19408 19861 20678 20910 20910 20910 Projected FTE Enrollment** 17740 18435 18759 19120 19328 19560 Permanent Capacity @ 95% surplus/deficit 1672 -2450 -1957 -2086 -2294 -2526 Permanent Cap w/Portables su lus/deficit 1668 1426 1919 17901 1582 1350 * Permanent Capacity and New Construction calculations are based on the 95% utilization factc The number of planned portables may be reduced if permanent capacity is increased by a future bond issue. ** 2014-15 Actual October 1st enrollment counts, kindergarten students only counted as half an FTE -14 - Table #3 SCHOOL IMPACT FEE CALCULATIONS DISTRICT Issaquah SD #411 YEAR 2015 School Site Acquisition Cost: (AcresxCost per Acre)/Facility Capacity)xStudent Generation Factor Student Student Facility Cost/ Facility Factor Factor Cost/ Cost/ Acreage Acre Capacity SFR MFR SFR MFR Elementary 0.00 $1,500,000 604 0.473 0.156 $0 $0 Middle/JR High 0.00 $1,500,000 338 0.173 0.051 $0 $0 High 0.00 $1,500,000 1,500 0.150 0.049 $0 $0 TOTAL $0 $0 School Construction Cost: (Facility Cost/Facility Capacity)xStudent Generation Factor)x(permanent/Total Sq Ft) Student Student %Perm/ Facility Facility Factor Factor Cost/ Cost/ Total Sq.Ft. Cost Capacity SFR MFR SFR MFR Elementary 95.18% $20,350,000 604 0.473 0.156 $15,156 $5,002 Middle/JR High 95.18% $4,162.500 338 0.173 0.051 $2,028 $604 High 95.18% $0 336 0.150 0.049 $0 $0 TOTAL $17,184 $5,605 Temporary Facility Cost: (Facility Cost/Facility Capacity)xStudent Generation Factor)x(TemporarylTotal Square Feet) Student Student Cost/ Cost/ %Temp/ Facility Facility Factor Factor SFR MFR Total Sq.Ft. Cost Size SFR MFR Elementary 4.82% $175,000 80 0.473 0.156 $50 $16 Middle/JR High 4.82% $175,000 56 0.173 0.051 $26 $8 High 4.82% $175,000 224 0.150 0.049 $6 $2 TOTAL $82 $26 State Matching Credit: Area Cost Allowance X SPI Square Footage X District Match % X Student Factor Student Student Current Area SPI District Factor Factor Cost/ Cost/ Cost Allowance Footage Match % SFR MFR SFR MFR Elementary $200.40 90 0.00% 0.473 0.156 $0 $0 Middle/JR High $200.40 115 0.00% 0.173 0.051 $0 $0 High School $200.40 130 0.00% 0.150 0.049 $0 $0 TOTAL $0 $0 Tax Payment Credit: SFR MFR Average Assessed Value $610,086 $195,656 Capital Bond Interest Rate 3.68% 3.68% Net Present Value of Average Dwelling $5,028,113 $1,612,530 Years Amortized 10 10 Property Tax Levy Rate $1.59 $1.59 Present Value of Revenue Stream $7,995 $2,564 Fee Sumary: Single Multi - Family Family Site Acquistion Costs $0.00 $0.00 Permanent Facility Cost $17,184.05 $5,605.25 Temporary Facility Cost $81.53 $26.03 State Match Credit $0.00 $0.00 Tax Payment Credit ($7,994.70) ($2,563.92) FEE (AS CALCULATED) $9,270.88 $3,067.36 FEE (AS DISCOUNTED by 50%) $4,635.44 $1,533.68 FINAL FEE $4,635 $1,534 Each city or county sets and adopts the amount of the school impact fee. For the applicable fee schedule, please consult with the permitting jurisdiction for the development project. Is- BASIS FOR DATA USED IN SCHOOL IMPACT FEE CALCULATIONS SCHOOL SITE ACQUISITION COST: • Elementary No new sites are planned for purchase. • Middle School No new sites are planned for purchase. • High School No new sites are planned for purchase. SCHOOL CONSTRUCTION COST: • Elementary $20,350,000 is the proportional cost of the projects providing additional elementary capacity. ■ Middle School $4,162,000 is planned for the expansion of Maywood Middle School. • Issaquah Middle School will be rebuilt on a new site providing additional • capacity. • High School No new high schools are planned. PERCENTAGE OF PERMANENT AND TEMPORARY SQUARE FOOTAGE TO TOTAL SQUARE FOOTAGE: Total Square Footage 2,498,894 Permanent Square Footage (OSPI) 2,336,270 Temporary Square Footage 162,624 STATE MATCH CREDIT: Current Area Cost Allowance $200.44 Percentage of State Match 42.10% -16- V xipuaddV -LL- solgePod ul panias swooisselo Jo jagwnu wnwlxew all snld lyloedeo luaue"ad ayl sapnloul 43edeo wnwlxew ay1 lyoedeo u61sap aolnias )o lanai s,6ulpynq ayl sloa9w ploedeo luauewJad luawllau3 lunoopeaH snullry (joloel uogezlllln) %S6 x fyoedeO wnwlxely._. luawhwu3 LunoopeaH snuyry (joloel uoRezlllln) %96 x LDaedeO Waueuued... S-£ £Z: L 'Z-N OZ� L Jo la6Jel 9ZL-1 4W sogeJ 041411 q 10 9BWanV„ 9SZ- St6 1011L 9LZDL 08Z 4L 9669 llozgz 9ZL L60L Ibm 9L9 £4 0969 BYE �rltl101 L- Z9 OZL De 4 90B 08 4 Z£9 09 S 009 SZ 13SNns La- e8S LL US 0 0 Lfl9 M OZZ LL ZLf i6c ZZ-�L L D9£ 6L STIIHANNns 09 9 9L9 o4 Z Y09 Zt 9 061, 9Lfl lye E 084 4Z 3IISVOM3N tv O6£ 9f9 08 4 C" 4 Z SBf £ ile£ 6L SIIIH 3ldWi 6 -ZZ 449 OL 09L 0 0 W Z '0L We t—LY--y� IwLy IO 0 OBS 5Z A3117A HVf1OVSSl tz- LLZ' 99L OL 9LL 0 0 LEL LL OOZ OL LY9 L9 9£ £ 049 LZ 35OIH ONVNO - 99 t 9L9 0 0 9" m OOZ M Z9Y 90 9E £ 044 ZZ NnOAV3ON3 L- 99 9£9 0 0 Y09 m 09L 8 ZS► 19L.Y 19E £ 044 ZZ A83AOOS1O w LL- 99 9EL 04 Z 9ZB 069OZt 9 SM 9L9 9£ £ 045 LZ 3O1SN33NO Of- 9L- L9 8 9L9 0 O 90fl ON % 8 m 99V 9E E OZ4 LZ 30GIN 8vonOO i! E- 99 Z - YYL 0 0 18L L oov OZ LZf m 4Z Z OZ£ 9t NHVIO L► L- t 099 D p LZ9 OOZ - LfY 0 9 S 004 OZ H30N3TIVHO M ZS 9 999 0 0 ¢Z9 % 8 LLY Y Es 094 CZ 300IN 3OVOSVO Y ZZ9 8 "L 04 Z 09B L t 9 999 Z Z 099 9Z OOOMHVIHS S L 90L 0 0 £L9 DYt I L 01-9 4 4 OZS 9Z OIIOdV 9 ram.4f �4Y ,ih ,.1n• Y. 4 S3111OddVO IOOHOS J IIVJLN3W3'13 9VVWZ V xipuaddV Appendix B 2014-2015 MIDDLE SCHOOL CAPACITIES wg w -1Y It eA� f 01-1 b �F w y 'Minus excluded spaces for special program needs ..Permanent Capacity x 95 % (utilization factor) Minus Headcount Enrollment "'Maximum Capacity x 95% (utilization factor) Minus Headcount Enrollment Permanent capacity reflects the building's level of service design capacity The maximum capacity includes the permanent capacity plus the maximum number of classrooms served in portables - 1e - Appendix B Appendix C 2014-2015 HIGH SCHOOL CAPACITIES jj Minus excluded spaces for special program needs Headcount Enrollment Compared to Permanent Capacity x 95 % (utilization factor) Headcount Enrollment Compared to Maximum Capacity x 95 % (utilization factor) Permanent capacity reflects the building's level of service design capacity The maximum capacity includes the permanent capacity plus the maximum number of classrooms served in portables 1 s - Appendix C Appendix D 2014-2015 District Total Capacity l� we1J rr Ci Q7 C?� V •'� �' t� CR- ot 675 11 15834 83 996 16830 LiIHIEEIF-24 1 552 21462 206 19156 -2902 6313::11 'Permanent Capacity is the total Permanent Capacity from Appendix A + Total Capacity from Appendix B + Total Capacity from Appendix C - 20 - Appendix D Appendix E Six -Year Finance Plan BUILDING N/M* 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 cost to SECURED LOCALtSTATE** UNSECURED LOCAL*** Complete Issaquah Middle School M $500,000 $15,000,000 $35,000,000 $8,000,000 $4,000,000 $62.500.000 $62,500,000 Issaquah High School M $2,000,000 $2,000,000 $2,000,000 Liberty high School M $24,200,000 $30,500,000 $10.500.000 $65,200,000 $65,200,000 Maywood Middle School M $10,000,000 $2,500,000 $4.162.000 $16.662.000 $16,662,000 Clark Elementary M $1,000,000 $10,000,000 $10,250,000 $1,250,000 $22,500,000 $19,500,000 Tiger Mountain M $250,000 $2,000.000 $1,675,000 $3,925,000 $3,925,000 Apollo Elementary M $250,000 $6,020,000 $1,000.000 $7,270,000 $7,270,000 Issaquah Valley M $200,000 $7,285,000 $1,000,000 $8,485,000 $8,485,000 Sunny Hills M $1,000,000 $23,500,000 $2,700.000 $27,200,000 $27,200,000 Portables**** N $1,200,000 $3,150,000 $3.150,000 $500.000 TOTALS $38,350,000 $64,006,000 $63,662,000 $20,925,000 $28,760,000 $2,700,000 $215,892,000 $212,892,000 $5009000 *N = New Construction M = Modemization/Rebuild "The Issaquah School District, with voter approval, has front funded these projects. ***School impact fees may be utilized to offset front funded expenditures associated with the cost of new facilities. Impact fees are currently collected from King County, City of Bellevue, City of Newcastle, City of Renton, City of Sammamish and the City of Issaquah for projects within the Issaq. School District. ****Funds for portable purchases may come from impact fees, state matching funds, interest earnings or future bond sale elections. -21- Appendix E Kent School District Capital Facilities Plan 2015 20 ` 6 - 2020-20 1 KENT SCHOOL DISTRICT ,dune 2015 SIX -YEAR CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN 2015-2016 a 2020-2021 June 2015 Kent School District No. 415 12033 SE 256`h Street Kent, Washington 98030-6643 (253) 373-7295 BOARD of DIRECTORS Ms. Karen DeBruler, President Ms. Deborah Straus, Vice President Ms. Agda Burchard, Legislative Representative Mr. Russ Hanscom, Director Ms. Maya Vengadasalam, Director Dr. Calvin J. Watts Superintendent of Schools Dr. Richard A. Stedry, Chief Business Officer Ralph Fortunato, CSBS, Director of Fiscal Services Fred Long, Director of Facilities Services Kent School District Six -Year Capital Facilities Plan June 2015 Kent School District Sim Tear Capital Facilities Flan 2a6Ce of Contents Section Page Number I Executive Summary 2 11 Six -Year Enrollment Projection & History 4 III District Standard of Service 9 I V Inventory, Capacity & Maps of Existing Schools 12 V Six -Year Planning & Construction Plan — Site Map 15 V I Portable Classrooms 18 V I I Projected Classroom Capacity 19 V I I I Finance Plan, Cost Basis and Impact Fee Schedules 24 I X Summary of Changes to Previous Plan 32 X Appendixes 33 Kent School District Six -Year Capital Facilities Plan June 2015 Executive Summary This Six -Year Capital Facilities Plan (the "Plan") has been prepared by the Kent School District (the "District') as the organization's capital facilities planning document, in compliance with the requirements of Washington's Growth Management Act, King County Code K.C.C. 21A.43 and Cities of Kent, Covington, Renton, Auburn, Black Diamond, Maple Valley, and SeaTac. This annual Plan update was prepared using data available in the spring of 2015 for the 2014-2015 school year. This Plan is consistent with prior long-term capital facilities plans adopted by the Kent School District. This Plan is not intended to be the sole planning document for all of the District's needs. The District may prepare interim and periodic Long Range Capital Facilities Plans consistent with Board Policies, taking into account a longer or shorter time period, other factors and trends in the use of facilities, and other needs of the District as may be required. Prior Capital Facilities Plans of the Kent School Metropolitan King County Council and Cities of Renton and included in the Capital Facilities Plan Plans of each jurisdiction. This Plan has also be Diamond, Maple Valley, and SeaTac for their in Comprehensive Plans. District have been adopted by Kent, Covington, Auburn and element of the Comprehensive an submitted to cities of Black ormation and inclusion in their In order for impact fees to be collected in the unincorporated areas of Kent School District, the Metropolitan King County Council must adopt this Plan and a fee -implementing ordinance for the District. For impact fees to be collected in the incorporated portions of the District, the cities of Kent, Covington, Renton and Auburn must also adopt this Plan and their own school impact fee ordinances. This Capital Facilities Plan establishes a standard of service in order to ascertain current and future capacity. While the State Superintendent of Public Instruction establishes square footage guidelines for capacity, those guidelines do not account for local program needs in the District. The Growth Management Act, King County and City codes and ordinances authorize the District to make adjustments to the standard of service based on specific needs for students of the District. This Plan includes the standard of service as established by Kent School District. Program capacity is based on an average capacity and updated to reflect changes to special programs served in each building. Portables in the capacity calculation use the same standard of service as the permanent facilities. (continued) Kent School District Six -Year Capital Facilities Plan June 2015 Page 2 I Executive Summary (continued) The capacity of each school in the District is calculated based on the District standard of service and the existing inventory of permanent facilities. The District's program capacity of permanent facilities reflects program changes and the state's mandated reduction of class size to meet the standard of service for Kent School District. Portables provide additional transitional capacity. Kent School District is the fourth largest district in the state. Enrollment is electronically reported monthly to the Once of the Superintendent of Public Instruction ("OSPI") on Form P-223. Although funding apportionment is based on Annual Average Full Time Equivalent (AAFTE), enrollment on October 1 is a widely recognized "snapshot in time" that is used to report the District's enrollment for the year as reported to OSPI. The Board of Directors approved Full Day Kindergarten ("FDK") for all Elementary Schools in 2011-12 and FDK projections are used to forecast Kindergarten enrollment in future years. The District received authorization from the Office of Superintendent of Public Instruction to temporarily re -open the former Kent Elementary School at 317 Fourth Ave South in Kent. This facility will be used to house the kindergarten and early child education classes for both Kent and Neely -O'Brien Elementary Schools to alleviate overcrowding at those schools. This building re -opened in fall 2014 as the Kent Valley Early Learning Center. The District's standard of service, enrollment history and projections, and use of transitional facilities are reviewed in detail in various sections of this Plan. The District plans to continue to satisfy concurrency requirements through the transitional use of portables. A financing plan is included in Section VIII which demonstrates the District's ability to implement this Plan. Pursuant to the requirements of the Growth Management Act, this Plan will be updated annually with changes in the impact fee schedules adjusted accordingly. Kent School District Six -Year Capital Facilities Plan June 2015 Page 3 11 Six - Year Enrollment Projection For capital facilities planning, enrollment growth projections are based on cohort survival and student yield from documented residential construction projected over the next six years. (see Tabta 2, page s) The student generation factor is the basis for the growth projections from new developments. (see Page 5) King County live births and the District's relational percentage average were used to determine the number of kindergartners entering the system. (see rebte r, page 7) 8.98% of 24,514 King County live births in 2010 is projected for 2,202 students expected in Kindergarten for October 1, 2015. This is an decrease of 543 live births in King County over the previous year. (see Tabiez pagea) Full Day Kindergarten ("FDK") programs at all 28 elementary schools require an adjustment to the Kindergarten forecast for projecting FDK at 1.0 FTE for capital facilities planning. P-223 Reports will continue to include FDK students at 1.0 for twelve schools with FDK funded by state apportionment, and all other kindergarten students will be reported at .50 FTE for state funding in 2014-2015. Early Childhood Education students (also identified as "ECE°), "Preschool Inclusive Education ("IE") students are forecast and reported to OSPI separately on Form P-223H for Special Education Enrollment. Capacity is reserved to serve students in the ECE programs at elementary schools. The first grade population of Kent School District is traditionally 2-3% larger than the kindergarten population due to growth and transfers to the District from private kindergartens. Cohort survival method uses historical enrollment data to forecast the number of students projected for the following year. Projections for October 1, 2015-2020 are from OSPI Report 1049 — Determination of Projected Enrollments. Within practical limits, the District has kept abreast of proposed developments. The District will continue to track new development activity to determine impact to schools. Information on new residential developments and the completion of these proposed developments in all jurisdictions will be considered in the District's future analysis of growth projections. The Kent School District serves eight permitting jurisdictions: unincorporated King County, the cities of Kent, Covington, Renton, and Auburn and smaller portions of the cities of SeaTac, Black Diamond, and Maple Valley (Continued) Kent School District Six -Year Capital Facilities Plan June 2015 Page 4 11 Six - Year Enrollment Projection (continued) STUDENT GENERATION FACTOR "Student Factor" is defined by King County code as "the number derived by a school district to describe how many students of each grade span are expected to be generated by a dwelling unit' based on district records of average actual student generated rates for developments completed within the last ten years. Following these guidelines, the student generation rate for Kent School District is as follows: Single Family Elementary .257 Middle School .070 Senior High .138 Total .465 Multi -Family Elementary .111 Middle School .022 Senior High .039 Total .172 The student generation factor is based on a survey of 3,867 single family dwelling units and 966 multi -family dwelling units with no adjustment for occupancy rates. Please refer to Appendix E on Page 36 of the Capital Facilities Plan for details of the Student Generation Factor survey. In preparing the 2015-2016 to 2020-2021 Capital Facilities Plan the District contracted with Davis Demographics and Planning (DDP) of Riverside California, a noted expert: in demographic studies for school districts, to analyze and prepare the student generation factor. DDP used a larger sample of single family residences than the district did in previous plans and included both "garden" and "urban style" apartments in the calculation for multi -family residences. Urban style apartments typically have four stories, a central lobby and entrance, elevator access to all floors and have a central corridor with apartments on each side. These apartments have little or no surface street parking, with parking located beneath the building, retail may or may not be included with the building. If there is retail it will generally be located on the first floor. These apartments seldom have swimming pools and do not have playgrounds for children. (Continued) Kent School District Six -Year Capital Facilities Plan June 2015 Page 5 I I Six - Year Enrollment Projection (Continued) Garden style apartments will have very little studio apartments and will have more three bedroom apartments then the urban style and in theory generate more students enrolled in school. These apartments will also have lawns, club houses, swimming pools and places for children to play. The District felt that it is important to include both styles of apartments for the student generation factor. Though it is anticipated that few students will come from the urban style, they are now part of the mix in Kent and thus should be included in mix of mufti -family housing units. Kent School District Six -Year Capital Facilities Plan June 2018 Page 6 m W N W O h o w N N' N N N N N N (aV N N m W O N O N m V 0 0 0 0 O m v M N N w w � h O m O V N W MOp N � h to CW'1 M tOtl V O W O m N N � N N N N N n N N N N N ovi m co N M O � n N N O 0 N m w O M W W G M W O O M O O M N N Tc6 w v M tp h m h r h p r n 0 � W m W 0 O N O Epp O N N N c9 V W rD W c0 M O O O> W O O O ry O m O M n o tm CO (D N M tm fp � N tD N h wcoN N W N N N N N N N N N N O w M W M h h N O O r N C9 N N O W O O h N O O O O O O P O N 0 N Op In N fp W tm N W N N N C6 N N N N N N N N N N N o o N W ttl h h M fm h W O O O ap nv N N N NN v ro W N N N N N m pp r fV N tV r N C12L N a a m R r N M c d a a B -°o a a v w v a v TO 'g a t6 m � o TO w � G T 20 2 R V T 2 E Y P Y 0 0 (D C9 CD 0 0 0C9 C9 (9 C7 ~ } v KENT SCHOOL DISTRICT No. 415 SIX -YEAR ENROLLMENT PROJECTION Full Dav Kindergarten at all Elem LB in 200B LB in 200e LB in 2010 Is in 20/1 LB in 2012 LB Ed. 2013 LB Est 2n14 ACTUAL P R O J E C T 1 0 N October 2014 2015 2016 2017 11 2018 2019 2020 King County Live Births' 25,067 24,514 24,630 25,032 25,890 26,490 26,998 1 Increase / Decrease 323 -543 116 402 868 600 508 Kindergarten / Birth % 2 8.34% 8.98% 9.160% 9.23% 9.13% 9.130/. 9.16% FD Kindergarten @ 1.0 2090 2,202 2,256 2,310 2,364 2,419 2,473 Grade 1 2127 2,139 2,253 2,309 2,364 2,419 2,475 Grade 2 2190 2,140 2,152 2,266 2,323 2,378 2,433 Grade 3 2070 2,229 2,178 2,190 2,306 2,364 2,420 Grade 4 1956 2,082 2,241 2,190 2,202 2,319 2,377 Grade 5 2116 1,977 2,104 2,265 2,213 2,225 2,343 Grade 6 2023 2,155 2,015 2,144 2,308 2,255 2,267 Grade 7 2104 2,030 2,163 2,022 2,152 2,317 2,263 Grade 8 2091 2,127 2,052 2,186 2,044 2,175 2,342 Grade 9 2428 2,401 2,442 2,356 2,510 2,347 2,497 Grade 10 2151 2,129 2,104 2,140 2,065 2,200 2,057 Grade 11 1802 1,911 1,891 1,869 1,901 1,835 1,954 Grade 12 1576 1,478 1,567 1,551 1,533 1,559 1,605 Total Enrollment Projection 3 26,724 27,000 27,418 27,798 28,285 28,812 29,406 Yearly Increase/Decrease 3 276 418 380 487 527 594 Yearly Increase/Decrease % 1.03% 1.55% 1.39% 1.750% 1.86% 2.06% Total Enrollment Projection 1 26,724 1 27,798 28,285 28,812 29,406 1 Kindergarten enrollment projection for 2015 is based on Kent SD percentage of live births in King County five years previous. 2 Kindergarten projection is calculated by using the District's previous year percentage of King County births five years earlier compared to actual kindergarten enrollment in the previous year. (Excludes ECE - Early Childhood Education preschoolers) 3 Headcount Projections for 2015 - 2020 from OSPI Report 1049 - Determination of Projected Enrollments 4 Oct. 2014 P223 Headcount is 26,724 & FTE 25,888.84. Full Headcount with ECE Preschool & Running Start students = 28,090 G R O W T H P R O J E C T I O N S - Adjustments for current economic factors For facilities planning purposes, this six -year enrollment projection anticipates conservative enrollment growth from new development currently in some phase of planning or construction in the district. Kent School District Six -Year Capital Facilities Plan Table 2 June 2015 Page 8 III Current Kent School District "Standard of Service" In order to determine the capacity of facilities in a school district, King County Code 21A.06 references a "standard of service" that each school district must establish in order to ascertain its overall capacity. The standard of service identifies the program year, the class size, the number of classrooms, students and programs of special need, and other factors determined by the district which would best serve the student population. This Plan includes the standard of service as established by Kent School District. The District has identified schools with significant special needs programs as "impact" schools and the standard of service targets a lower class size at those facilities. Portables included in the capacity calculation use the same standard of service as the permanent facilities. (See Appendix A, e & c) The standard of service defined herein will continue to evolve in the future. Kent School District is continuing a long-term strategic planning process combined with review of changes to capacity and standard of service. This process will affect various aspects of the District's standard of service and future changes will be reflected in future capital facilities plans. Current Standards of Service for Elementary Students Class size for Kindergarten is planned for an average of 23 or fewer students. Class size for grades 1 - 3 is planned for an average of 23 or fewer students. Class size for grades 4 - 6 is planned for an average of 27 or fewer students. Class size for Kindergarten and grades 1 and 2, for schools that qualify for high poverty funding (18 elementary schools for 2015-16) is planned for an average of 20 or fewer students. All elementary schools meet the criteria required to provide full day kindergarten programs (FDK = Full Day Kindergarten) with the second half of the day funded by state apportionment or the Educational Programs and Operations Levy. Twelve schools with FDK Programs have state apportionment funding. Some special programs require specialized classroom space and the program capacity of some of the buildings housing these programs is reduced. Some students, for example, leave their regular classroom for a short period of time to receive instruction in special programs and space must be allocated to serve these programs. Some students have scheduled time in a computer lab. Students may also be provided music instruction and physical education in a separate classroom or facility. Kent School District Six -Year Capital Facilities Plan June 2015 Page 9 Some identified students will also be provided educational opportunities in classrooms for special programs such as those designated as follows: English Language Learners (E L L) Education for Disadvantaged Students (Title I) — Federal Program Learning Assisted Programs (LAP) — State Program Highly Capable Students -State Program Reading, Math or Science Labs Dual Language Programs in 4 elementary schools Inclusive Education Service for Elementary and Secondary students with disabilities may be provided in a separate or self-contained classroom sometimes with a capacity of 10-15 depending on the program: Early Childhood Education (ECE) -3-4 yr. old students with disabilities Tiered Intervention in Inclusive Education Support Center Programs Integrated Programs & Resource Rooms (for special remedial assistance) Self-contained Inclusive Education Support Center Programs (SC) School Adjustment Programs for students with behavioral disorders (SA) Adaptive Support Center for Mild, Moderate & Severe Disabilities (Asc-Do) Speech & Language Therapy & Programs for Hearing Impaired students Occupational & Physical Therapy Programs (OT/PT) The Outreach Program (TOP) for 18-21 year old secondary students Some newer buildings have been constructed to accommodate most of these programs; some older buildings have been modified, and in some circumstances, these modifications reduce the classroom capacity of the buildings. When programs change, program capacity is updated to reflect the change in program and capacity. Current Standards of Service for Secondary Students The standards of service outlined below reflect only those programs and educational opportunities provided to secondary students which directly affect the capacity of the school buildings. Class size for grades 7 — 8 is planned for an average of 28.6 or fewer students. Class size for grades 9 — 12 is planned for an average of 30.6 or fewer students. Similar to Inclusive Education Programs listed above, many other secondary programs require specialized classroom space which can reduce the program capacity of the permanent school buildings. Kent School District Six -Year Capital Facilities Plan June 2015 Page 10 Identified secondary students will also be provided other educational opportunities in classrooms for programs designated as follows: Computer, Multi -Media & Technology Labs & Programs Technology Academy at Kent -Meridian High School & Mill Creek Middle School Science Programs & Labs - Biology, Chemistry, Physics, Oceanography, Astronomy, Meteorology, Marine Biology, General Science, etc. English Language Learners (E L L) Music Programs - Band, Orchestra, Chorus, Jazz Band, etc. Art Programs - Painting, Design, Drawing, Ceramics, Pottery, Photography, etc. Theater Arts - Drama, Stage Tech, etc. Journalism and Yearbook Classes Highly Capable (Honors or Gifted) and Advanced Placement Programs International Baccalaureate (°I W) Program JROTC - Junior Reserve Officers Training Corps Career & Technical Education Programs (CTE - Vocational Education) Family & Consumer Science - Culinary Arts, Sewing, Careers w/ChildrentEduc., etc. Child Development Preschool and Daycare Programs Health & Human Services - Sports Medicine, Sign Language, Cosmetology, etc. Business Education - Word Processing, Accounting, Business Law & Math, Marketing, Economics, Web Design, DECA, FBLA (Future Business Leaders). Technical & Industry - Woodworking, Cabinet Making, Building Trades, Metals, Automotive & Manufacturing Technology, Welding, Drafting, Drawing, CAD (Computer -aided Design), Electronics, Engineering & Design, Aviation, ASL, etc. Graphic & Commercial Arts, Media, Photography, Theater & Stage, Ag & Horticulture. Kent Phoenix Academy - Performance Learning Center, Gateway, Virtual High School & Kent Success program with evening classes for credit retrieval. Space or Classroom Utilization As a result of scheduling conflicts for student programs, the need for specialized rooms for certain programs, and the need for teachers to have a work space during their planning periods, it is not possible to achieve 100% utilization of regular teaching stations at secondary schools. Based on the analysis of actual utilization of classrooms, the District has determined that the standard utilization rate is 85% for secondary schools. Program capacity at elementary schools reflects 100% utilization at the elementary level. Kent School District Six -Year Capital Facilities Plan June 2015 Page 11 Currently, the District has permanent program capacity to house 27,489 students and transitional (portable) capacity to house 2,539. This capacity is based on the Districts Standard of Service as set forth in Section I 11. Included in this Plan is an inventory of the District's schools by type, address and current capacity. (see Table 3 on Page 13). The ratio between permanent capacity and portable capacity is 96.6%-3.4%. The program capacity is periodically updated for changes in programs, additional classrooms and new schools. Program capacity has been updated in this Plan to reflect program changes implemented in the Fall of 2014. For the 2014-15 school year and beyond the state has mandated lower class sizes in 18 elementary schools that are classified as high poverty. The new class size in grades K-1 and 2 will be 20 students for every teacher. Calculation of Elementary, Middle School and Senior High School capacities are set forth in Appendices A, B and C. A map of existing schools is included on Page 14. For clarification, the following is a brief description of some of the non-traditional programs for students in Kent School District; Kent Mountain View Academy serves Grades 3 — 12 with transition, choice and home school assistance programs. It is located in the former Grandview School in the western part of the district in Des Moines. This school was originally designed as an elementary school and is included in the elementary capacity for this Plan. Kent Phoenix Academy is a non-traditional high school which opened in Fall 2007 in the renovated site and building that formerly served Sequoia Middle School. Kent Phoenix Academy has four special programs including the Performance Learning Center, Gateway, Virtual High School and Kent Success. iGrad - In partnership with Green River College, Kent School District has pioneered the Individualized Graduation and Degree Program or "iGrad". iGrad offers a second chance to students age 16-21 who have dropped out of high school and want to earn a high school diploma. iGrad is not included in this Capital Facilities Plan because it is served in leased space at the Kent Hill Plaza Shopping Center. Over the past two years, enrollment in the iGrad program has averaged over 300 students. Kent School District Six -Year Capital Facilities Plan June 2015 Page 12 KENT SCHOOL DISTRICT No.416 INVENTORY and CAPACITY of EXISTING SCHOOLS 2014-2015 Year SCHOOL openad ABR ADDRESS Program Ca aci Carriage Crest Elementary 1990 CC 18235 -140th Avenue SE, Renton 98058 456 Cedar Valley Elementary 1971 CV 26500 Timbedane Way SE, Covington 98042 364 Covington Elementary 1961 CO 17070 SE Wax Road, Covington 98042 488 Crestwood Elementary 1980 CW 25225 -180th Avenue SE, Covington 98042 432 East Hill Elementary 1953 EH 9825 S 240th Street, Kent 98031 466 Emerald Park 1999 EP 11800 SE 216th Street, Kent 98031 484 Fainvood Elementary 1969 FW 16600 -148th Avenue SE, Renton 98058 408 George T. Daniel Elementary 1992 DE 11310 SE 248th Street, Kent 98030 428 Glenridge Elementary 1995 GR 19405 -120th Avenue SE, Renton 98058 436 Grass Lake Elementary 1971 GL 28700 -191 at Place BE, Kent 98042 438 Horizon Elementary 1990 HE 27641 -144th Avenue SE Kent 98042 477 Jenkins Creek Elementary 1987 JC 26915 - 186th Avenue SE, Covington 98042 459 Kent Elementary 1999 KE 24700 - 64m Avenue South, Kent 98032 460 Kent Valley Early Learning Center 2014 KV 317 —4th Ave S, Kent, WA 98032 336 Lake Youngs Elementary 1965 LY 19660 -142nd Avenue SE, Kent 98042 524 Martin Sortun Elementary 1987 MS 12711 SE 248th Street, Kent 98030 452 Meadow Ridge Elementary 1994 MR 27710 - 108th Avenue SE, Kent 98030 440 Meridian Elementary 1939 ME 25621 - 140th Avenue SE, Kent 98042 524 Millennium Elementary 2000 MIL 11919 SE 270th Street, Kent 98030 484 Neely -O'Brien Elementary 1990 NO 6300 South 236m Street, Kent 98032 460 Panther Lake Elementary 2009 PL 20831 -108th Avenue SE, Kent 98031 504 Park Orchard Elementary 1963 PO 11010 BE 232nd Street, Kent 98031 476 Pine Tree Elementary 1967 PT 27825 -118th Avenue SE, Kent 98030 477 Ridgewood Elementary 1987 RW 18030 -162nd Place SE, Renton 98058 504 Sawyer Woods Elementary 1994 SW 31135 - 228th Ave SE, Black Diamond 98010 486 Scenic Hill Elementary 1960 SH 26025 Woodland Way South, Kent 98030 448 Soos Creek Elementary 1971 SC 12651 SE 218th Place, Kent 98031 342 Spdngbmok Elementary 1969 SB 20035 - 100th Avenue SE, Kent 98031 418 Sunrise Elementary 1992 SR 22300 -132nd Avenue BE, Kent 98042 543 Elementary TOTAL 13,214 Cedar Heights Middle School 1993 CH 19640 SE 272 Street, Covington 98042 $95 Mattson Middle School 1981 MA 16400 SE 251 at Street, Covington 98042 787 Masker Middle School 1970 MK 12600 SE 192nd Street, Renton 98058 832 Meridian Middle School 1958 MM 23480 - 120th Avenue SE, Kent 98031 792 Mill Creek Middle School 2005 MC 620 North Central Avenue, Kent 98032 916 Northwood Middle School 1996 NW 17007 SE 184th Street, Renton 98058 926 Middle School TOTAL 5,148 Kent -Meridian High School 1951 KM 10020 SE 256th Street, Kent 98030 1,904 Kentlake Senior High School 1997 KL 21401 SE 300th Street, Kent 98042 1,957 Kentndge Senior High School 1968 KR 12430 SE 20M Street, Kent 98031 2,277 Kentwood Senior High School 1981 KW 25800 -164th Avenue SE, Covington 98042 2,169 Senior High TOTAL 8,297 Kent Mountain View Academy 1997 MV/LC 22420 Military Road, Des Moines 98199 414 Kent Phoenix Academy 2007 PH 11000 SE 264th Street, Kent 98030 416 DISTRICT TOTAL 27,489 Kent School District Six -Year Capital Facilities Plan Table 3 June 2015 Page 13 n �¢amn 0 a c'ea C' '/mil' �f®e o m R� oa g�® LLW 3S eAV m � N y u y® e a 22 .o E S a N a c mm m a)L � mt O L d �c y aa U2 mE a a o � 0.12 m ® �W s®p Lpp ® a'o ®U ® 0� ® c m aE o CN ®W �O am C\,3 3S eAV 94V9I ° c pro C;4 M to m m •P �v Maim W 3S 3(iry' PUZQ I y C 2 W 3S aAV PUFT I E CR W 1 a 5cm s`mcaci �.� U ? 6 0 a'o� o ®' Qc1 c ®� e E ay N 8_ �}v� W 25 Y.a O 0 \� �/ V ®p CO O Cn ® ag �:.W 4i4Di O Cn 7 O _® � ® C = a v am C C C s 'm c® mE M uiYY X co �� N Kent School District Six -Year Capital Facilities Plan June 2016 Page 14 V Six-YearPlarmnirg endi Construietto,n Pian PXt the til ne cif pr eparabon of this Plan in spring of 2015, the following projects to increase capacity are in the planning phase in Kent School District; a Planning is in progress for a replacement school for Covington Elementary School in 2018 or beyond. The project is pending satisfactory financial resources to fund the project. a Planning is in progress for additional classroom space for Neely -O'Brien Elementary School. This addition will add approximately 25% to building capacity and is expected to come online in fall of 2019 pending satisfactory financial resources to fund the project. m Enrollment projections reflect future need for additional capacity at the elementary school level. Future facility and site needs are reflected in this Plan. Q Some funding for lease or purchase of additional portables may be provided by impact fees as needed. Sites are based on need for additional capacity. As a critical component of Capital facilities planning, county and city planners and decision -makers are encouraged to consider safe walking conditions for all students when reviewing applications and design plans for new roads and developments. This should include sidewalks for pedestrian safety to and from school and bus steps as wall as bus pull-outs and turn-arounds for school buses. Included in this Plan is an inventory of potential projects and sites identified by the District which are potentially acceptable site alternatives in the future. (see Table 4 or Page 16 & Site map on Fags 17) Doter approved bond issues have included funding for the purchase of sites for some of these and future schools, and the sites acquired to date are included in this Plan. Some funding is secured for purchase of additional sites but some may be funded with impact fees as needed. Not all undeveloped properties meet current school construction requirements and some property may be traded or sold to meet future facility needs. The Board of Directors has started the process to sell surplus property in the spring of 2015. 2006 voter approval of $106M bond issue for capital improvement included the construction funding for a new elementary school, replacement of Panther lake Elementary, and classroom additions to high schools. Some impact fees have been utilized for those projects. In March 2013 the Board of Directors reallocated the funding for the new elementary school to capital projects for safety and security. The Board will continue annual review of standard of service and those decisions will be reflected in the each update of the Capital Facilities Plan. Kent School District Six -Year Capital Facilities Plan ,June 2016 Page 15 KENT SCHOOL DISTRICT No.415 Site Acquisitions and Projects Planned to Provide Additional Capacity SCHOOL 1 FACILITY / SITE I LOCATION T e Status Projected ProjetYetl -A for Completion Program new Date Capacity Growth "^) ELEMENTARY I Replacement 6 Replacement for Covington Elementary (U) BE 256th Street & 154th Ave SE Elementary Planning 2018-19 600 16% Covington Elem - Capacity to be replaced 17070 SE Wax Road, Covington Elementary Utilized -504 Elementary Neely -O'Brien Elementary School - Addition (U) 6300 S 236th Street, Kent 98032 Addition Planning 2019.20 600 25% Classrooms added to provide New Capacity Current Capacity 480 + 120 New = 600 Planning MIDDLE SCHOOL & SENIOR HIGH No new projects required for Secondary Schools at this time & Secondary Schools are excluded from Impact Fee formula. TEMPORARY FACILITIES Additional Capacity Portables' TBD - For placement as needed New Planning 2015+ m- at each 100% ..I s OTHER SITES ACQUIRED 4 Covington area North (Near Mattson MS) 5 Covington area West (Halleson-Wikstrom) 3 Ham Lake area (Pollard) 8 BE of Lake Morton area (West property) 2 Shady Lk area (Sowers, Blaine, Drahota, Famine) 1 So. King Co. Activity Center (former Nike site) 12 South Central site (Plemmons-Yah-Wma) BE 251 & 164 BE, Covington 98042 BE 256 & 154 SE, Covington 98042 16820 SE 240, Kent 98042 BE 332 & 204 BE, Kent 98042 17426 SE 192 Street, Renton 98058 BE 167 & 170 BE, Renton 98058 BE 286th St & 124th Ave BE, Auburn 98092 Sena vac Land Use oasiartation Type Judsdiction Urban Elementary City of Covington Urban Elementary y of Covington Rural Elementary King County Rural Secondary King County Urban Elementary King County Rural TBD 2 King County Urban TBD' King County Notes: r Unfunded facility needs will be reviewed in the future. TBD - To be determined - Some sites are identified but placement, timing and/or configuration of portables has not been determined. a Numbers correspond to sites on Site Bank Map on Page 17. Other Map site locations are parcels Identified in Table 7 on Page 28. Kent School District Six -Year Capital Facilities Plan Table 4 June 2015 Page 16 ,::�U ME o , Cr 0 m o -S17P4 d CA ! E � \ > - a /® / mom__ 7 \ \ \ k V Kent School DistrictSix-Year Capi_ Facilities_ __ m,= The Plan references use of portable as interim or transitional capacity and facilities. Currently, the District utilizes portables to house students in excess of permanent capacity and for program purposes at some school locations. (Please see Appendices A B C D) Based on enrollment projections, implementation of full day kindergarten programs, program capacity and the need for additional permanent capacity, the District anticipates the need to purchase or lease additional portables during the next six -year period. During the time period covered by this Plan, the District does not anticipate that all of the District's portables will be replaced by permanent facilities. During the useful life of some of the portables, the school -age population may decline in some communities and increase in others, and these portables provide the flexibility to accommodate the immediate needs of the community. Portables may be used as interim or transitional facilities: 1. To prevent overbuilding or overcrowding of permanent school facilities. 2. To cover the gap between the time of demand for increased capacity and completion of permanent school facilities to meet that demand. 3. To meet unique program requirements. Portables currently in the District's inventory are continually evaluated resulting in some being improved and some replaced. The Plan projects that the District will use portables to accommodate interim housing needs for the next six years and beyond. The use of portables, their impacts on permanent facilities, life cycle and operational costs, and the interrelationship between portables, emerging technologies and educational restructuring will continue to be examined. Kent School District Six -Year Capttal Facilities Plan June 2015 Page 18 V I I Projected Six -Year Classroom Capacity As stated in Section IV, the program capacity study is periodically updated for changes in special programs and reflects class size fluctuations, grade level splits, etc. As shown in the Inventory and Capacity chart in Table 3 on Page 13, the program capacity is also reflected in the capacity and enrollment comparison charts. (See Tables 5 & 5 A-B-C on pages 20-23) Enrollment is electronically reported to OSPI on Form P-223 on a monthly basis and funding apportionment is based on Annual Average FTE (AAFTE). The first school day of October is widely recognized as the enrollment "snapshot in time" to report enrollment for the year. Kent School District continues to be the fourth largest district in the state of Washington. P-223 Headcount for October 2014 was 26,724 with kindergarten students counted at 1.0 and excluding ECE and college -only Running Start students. A full headcount of all students enrolled in October 2014 totals 28,090 which includes ECE and college -only Running Start students. In October there were 826 students in 11th and 12th grade participating in the Running Start program at different colleges and receiving credits toward both high school and college graduation. 459 of these students attended classes only at the college ("college -only') and are excluded from FTE and headcount for capacity and enrollment comparisons. Kent School District has one of the highest Running Start program participation rates in the state. Based on the enrollment forecasts, permanent facility inventory and capacity, current standard of service, portable capacity, and future additional classroom space, the District plans to continue to satisfy concurrency requirements through the transitional use of portables. (see Table 5 and Tables 5A-B-C on Pages 20-23) This does not mean that some schools will not experience overcrowding. There may be a need for additional portables and/or new schools to accommodate growth within the District. New schools may be designed to accommodate placement of future portables. School attendance area changes, limited and costly movement of relocatables, zoning changes, market conditions, and educational restructuring will all play a major role in addressing overcrowding and underutilization of facilities in different parts of the District. Kent School District Sic -Year Capital Facilities Plan June 201E Page 19 KENT SCHOOL DISTRICT No. 415 PROJECTED ENROLLMENT and CAPACITY SCHOOL YEAR 2014-15 2015-15 2016-17 1 2017-18 1 2018-19 1 2019-20 1 2020-21 Actual I P R O J E C T E D Permanent Program Capacity' 1 27,489 Changes to Permanent Capacity 1 Capacity Increase (F) Replacement school with projected increase in capacity: Covington Elementary Replacement (u) 2 To Replace current Covington Elementary capacity 27,489 27,489 27,489 27,489 27,585 27,705 Neely -O'Brien Elementary Addition - Capacity Increase (u) 3 600 -504 120 Permanent Program Capacity Subtotal 27,489 27,489 27,489 27,489 27,585 27,705 27.705 Interim Portable Capacity 4 Elementary Portable Capacity Required 936 1;632 1,896 2,376 2,688 2,856 3,264 Middle School Portable Capacty Required 7 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Senior High School Portable Capacity Required r 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 936 1,632 1,896 2,376 2,688 2,856 3,264 TOTAL CAPACITY ' TOTAL ENROLLMENT/ PROJECTION s 26,566 27,000 27,418 27,798 28,285 28,812 29,406 DISTRICT AVAILABLE CAPACITY 1,859 2,121 1,967 2,067 1,988 1,749 1,563 ' Capacity is based on standard of service for programs provided and is updated periodically to reflect program changes s Replacement school for Covington Elementary will increase capacity and will be built on a different existing urban site. 3 Addition to Neely -O'Brien Elementary will increase capacity approximately 25%. 4 2014-15 total classroom portable capacity p p Ity is 936. Some additional relocatables used for program purposes. 5 Actual October Headcount Enrollment with Projections from OSPI Report 1049 - Determination of Projected Enrollments. Enrollment counts and projections have been adjusted for Full Day Kindergarten at all Elementary Schools. a School capacity meets concurrency requirements and no impact fees are proposed for secondary schools. Kent School District Six -Year Capital Facilities Plan Table 5 June 2016 Page 20 KENT SCHOOL DISTRICT No. 415 PROJECTED ENROLLMENT and CAPACITY SCHOOL YEAR 2014-15 2015-16 1 2016-17 1 2017-18 1 2018-1e 1 2019-20 2020-21 Actual P R O J E C T E D Elementary Permanent Capacity 113,214 13,286 13,286 13,286 13,286 13,382 13,502 Kent Mountain View Academy 2 414 Changes to Elementary Capacity Kent Valley Early Learning Center Capacity Increase (F) Covington Elementary Replacement (u) 3 600 Will replace current Covington Elementary capacity -504 Neely -O'Brien Elementary Addition Capacity Increase tu) 4 Subtotal 13,628 Portable Capacity Required' 936 120 13,286 13,286 13,286 13,382 13,502 13,502 1632 1896 2376 2688 2,856 3,264 Adjusted for FULL Day Kindergarten Headcount ENROLLMENT/PROJECTION 14,572 14,924 15199 15,674 16,080 16,379 16.788 NUmber of Portables Required 39 68 79 99 112 119 136 125 Classroom Portables required in 2019-20. Some additional portables used for program purposes. 1 Capacity is based on standard of service for programs provided and is updated periodically to reflect program changes. 2 Kent Mountain View Academy is a special program at the former Grandview School serving students in Grades 3 - 12. The school building (formerly Kent Learning Center & Grandview Elem.) was designed as an elementary school. a Replacement school for Covington Elementarywill increase capacity and is planned for a different existing urban site- 4 Addition to Neely -O'Brien Elementary will increase capacity approximately 26%. ' Actual October Headcount Enrollment with Projections from OSPI Report 1049 - Determination of Projected Enrollments. Enrollment & Projections reflect FULL Day Kindergarten at ALL Elementary schools Q 1.0 & exclude ECE Preschoolers. Kent School District Six -Year Capital Facilities Plan Table 6 A June 2015 Page 21 K€NT SCHOOL DISTRICT No. 416 PROJECTED ENROLLMENT and CAPACITY MIDDLE SCHOOL ® Grades 7 e 8 SCHOOL YEAR 201495 2015-15 1 2016.17 2017-18 201819 2019-20 1 2020-21 Aauai P R O J E C T E D Middle School Permanent Capacity' 5,148 5,148 6,148 5,148 5,148 5,148 5,148 No Changes to Middle School Capacity Subtotal 5,148 5,148 5,148 5,148 5,148 5,148 5,148 Portable Capacity Required' 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 TOTAL CAPACITY'13 5,148 5,148 5,148 5,148 5,148 5,148 5,148 ENROLLMENT/PROJECTION z 1 4,195 4.157 196 SURPLUS (DEFICIT) CAPACITY ° 1 953 991 933 940 952 656 543 Number of Portables Required 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 No Classroom Portables required at middle schools at this time. Some Portables used for classroom and program purposes. ' Capacity is based on standard of service for programs provided and is updated periodically to reflect program changes. 2 Actual October Headcount Enrollment with Projections from OSPI Report 1049 - Determination of Projected Enrollments. 9 Surplus capacity due to grade level reconfiguration - All 9th grade students moved to the high schools in Fall 2004. Middle School capacity meets concurrency requirements and no impact fees are collected for middle schools Kent School District Six -Year Capital Facilities Plan Table 5 13 June 2015 Page 22 KENT SCHOOL DISTRICT No. 416 PROJECTED ENROLLMENT and CAPACITY SENIOR HIGH ® Grades 9 ®1 2 SCHOOL YEAR 2014-15 2015-16 1 2016-17 1 2017-18 2018-19 2019-20 2020-21 Actual P R O J E C T E D Senior High Permanent Capacity' 8,713 8,713 8,713 8,713 8,713 8,713 8,713 Includes Kent Phoenix Academy Z No Changes to High School Capacity Subtotal 8,713 8,713 8,713 8,713 8,713 8,713 8,713 Portables Capacity Required 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 TOTAL CAPACITY ' 8,713 6,713 8,713 8.713 8,713 8,713 8.713 ENROLLMENT / PROJECTION 3 1 7,958 7.919 8,004 7 VAL&lil SURPLUS (DEFICIT) CAPACITY 1 755 794 709 797 704 772 701 Number of Portables Required 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 No Classroom Portables required at this time. Some Portables used for classroom and program purposes. ' Capacity is based on standard of service for programs provided and is updated periodically to reflect program changes. 2 Kent Phoenix Academyo in Fall 2007 serving opened p g grades 9 - 12 with four special programs. 3 Actual October Enrollment with Projections from OSPI Report 1049 - Determination of Projected Enrollments. ` High School capacity meets concurrency requirements and no impact fees are collected for high schools Kent School District Six -Year Capital Facilities Plan Tattle 5 C June 2015 Page 23 V I I I Finance Plan The finance plan shown on Table 6 demonstrates how the Kent School District plans to finance improvements for the years 2015-16 through 2020-21. The financing components include secured and unsecured funding and impact fees. The plan is based on voter approval of future bond issues, collection of impact fees under the State Growth Management Act and voluntary mitigation fees paid pursuant to State Environmental Policy Act. In February 2006, voters approved a $106 million bond issue that included funds for replacement of Panther Lake Elementary School with increased capacity, as well as construction of a new Elementary School to accommodate growth. The new Panther Lake Elementary School replaced the previous Panther Lake Elementary in Fall of 2009. The bond issue also funded Phase II of the renovation for Mill Creek Middle School and renovation of Sequoia Middle School for reconfiguration as a non-traditional high school, Kent Phoenix Academy, which opened in September 2007. 2006 construction funding also provided for additional classrooms at Kentlake High School and two projects at Kent -Meridian HS. The projects at Kent -Meridian provide additional capacity with several new classrooms and gymnasium space. The projects at K-M are completed and the new Main Gym added capacity for two more PE classrooms. Some impact fees were utilized for new construction that increased capacity. Originally, the district designated $16 million of the 2006 bond authorization toward the construction of an additional elementary school, identified as Elementary #31 in previous Plans. Due to a change in circumstances, the Board of Directors reallocated the $16 million for capital projects for safety and security. Replacement of Covington Elementary School in 2016-19 or beyond will increase capacity of ther current school by approximately 16%. Some impact fees will be utilized as part of the Finance Plan. A building addition is also planned to provide approximately 25% additional classroom capacity at Neely -O'Brien Elementary School in 2019-20. Some impact fees will be utilized as part of the Finance Plan. The Finance Plan includes new portables to be purchased or leased to provide additional capacity and some may be funded from impact fees. Enrollment projections reflect future need for additional capacity at the elementary level and unfunded facility needs will be reviewed in the future and reported in annual updates Kent School District Six -Year Capital Facilities Plan June 2015 Page 24 V I I I Finance Plan of the Capital Facilities Plan. No impact fees are requested for secondary schools in this Plan. For the Six -Year Finance Plan, costs of future schools are based on estimates from Kent School District Facilities Department. Please see pages 26-27 for a summary of the cost basis. Kent School District Six -Year Capital Facilities Plan June 2015 Page 25 L � o o uni r n m E m m m E a - ui ai M Ni - LL W F9 f9 a m® a o 0 d o 0 0 y m O f9 a R m y U N _�q O O J Q N O m mM O M r F 04 fR P M b> N m 4 M r M O N a N E WCt o a m ri M O O M O N W C q m N r Y c N d 6 of w m d o m o a o o a m 0 0 3 0 'm M o m N m g m c o ro MO » a q a 2 E c E m a w U w 1[J $ 9q Q m C L N p O C C tJ N Om d mm S J N � N m Yf th y� LL m � a c O N rz a ro 'dLu rq u 8 t Q d c a Q d R U R CL B M m m R 00 W TOO Z mcr _ fn ❑ d y'j Q W cUry W W c g W $ F LE yy w Y Y Z `i Vill Finance Plan - Cost Basis Summam For impact fee calculations, construction costs are based on cost of the last elementary school, adjusted for inflation, and projected cost of the next elementary school. Elementary School Cost Projected Cost Cost of Panther Lake Elementary $26,700,000 Replacement (Opened in Fall 2009) Projected cost - Covington Elementary $35,025,000 Replacement (Projected to open in 2018) I Projected cost of Neely -O'Brien Addition $15,500,000 (Projected to open in 2018) Elementary Cost based on $35,025,000 Covington Elementary Replacement Site Acquisition Cost The site acquisition cost is based on an average cost of sites purchased or built on within the last ten years. Please see Table 7 on page 28 for a list of site acquisition costs and averages. Kent School District Six -Year Capital Facilities Plan June 2015 Page 27 O M R ® R O OD W 2 N � O m m4 V cli M00 co m P r O co N h P CD t0 M O M O W W W O O O O 0) 00 n m^ co° et O O_ a M U V O In co I M M H `a n 05 O m N N M clJ 0 444 R N m W `o W a m to N W W i fq fry N (Wry d CN N O m m O O O N m On N N N 00 A W W W W W Obi W N ¢ R O Y CCC O 6 E z ... O c W to v L Cm Q `m emi m to (Yp S N y a w = d s w m N T �p E ? z ~ h z n m u to g Po N v N N a 0 KENT SCHOOL DISTRICT FACTORS FOR ESTIMATED IMPACT FEE CALCULATIONS Student Generation Factors - Single Family Elementary (Grades K - 6) 0.257 Middle School (Grades 7 - 8) 0.070 Senior High (Grades 9 - 12) 0.138 Total 0.465 Projected Increased Student Capacity Elementary 1632 Middle School 0 Senior High Addition 0 Required Site Acreage per Facility Elementary (required) 11 Middle School (required) 21 Senior High (required) 32 New Facility Construction Cost Elementary' $36,025,000 Middle School $0 Senior High ' $0 " See cost basis on Pg. 26 Temporary Facility Square Footage Elementary 85,616 Middle School 8,064 Senior High 20,400 Total 3.4% 114,079 Permanent Facility Square Footage Elementary (Includes KMVA) 1,470,543 Middle School 660,904 Senior High 1,110,415 Total 96.6% 3,241,862 Total Facilities Square Footage Elementary 1,556,158 Middle School 667,829 Senior High 1,130,815 Total 3,354,802 Developer Provided Sites / Facilities Value 0 Dwelling Units 0 Student Generation Factors - Multi -Family Elementary 0.111 Middle School 0.022 Senior High 0.039 Total 0.172 1111111, . Ilf.". - .- , I - Elementary 90 Middle School 117 Senior High 130 Special Education 144 Average Site Cost / Acre Elementary $287,573 Middle School $0 Senior High $0 Temporary Facility Capacity & Cost Elementary @ 24 $200,000 Middle School @ 29 $0 Senior High @ 31 $0 State Funding Assistance Credit (sa many staerescm°) District Funding Assistance Percentage 67.47°% CCA- Cost/Sq, Ft. (Effective July 2014) $200A0 District Average Assessed Value Single Family Residence $288,605 District Average Assessed Value Multi -Family Residence $114,153 Bond Levy Tax Rate/$1,000 Current / $1,000 Tax Rate (1.6842) $1.41 General Obligation Bond Interest Rate Current Bond Interest Rate 3.68% Kent School District Six -Year Capital Facilities Plan June 2015 Page 29 KENT SCHOOL DISTRICT IMPACT FEE CALCULATION fcr SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE Site Acquisition Cost per Single Family Residence Formula: ((Acres x cost per Acre) / Facility Capacity) x Student Generation Factor A 1 (Elementary) 11 $287,573 600 0.257 $1,354.95 A2 (Middle School) 21 $0 1,065 0.070 go A3 (Senior High) 32 $0 1,000 0.138 $0 0.465 A $1,354.95 Permanent Facility Construction Cost per Single Family Residence Formula: ((Facility Cost / Facility Capacity) x Student Factor) x (Permanent/Total Square Footaae Ratio) B 1 (Elementary) $35,025,000 600 0.257 0.966 $14,492.29 B 2 (Middle School) $0 900 0.070 0,966 $0 B 3 (Senior High) $0 1,600 0.138 0.966 $0 0.465 B 41 $14,492.29 Temporary Facility Cost per Single Family Residence Formula: ((Facility Cost / Facility Capacity) x Student Factor) x (Temporary / Total Sauafe Footaae Ratio) C 1 (Elementary) $200,000 24 0.267 0.034 $72.82 C 2 (Middle School) $0 29 0.070 0.034 $0 C 3 (Senior High) $0 31 0.138 0.034 $o 0.466 C b $72.82 State Funding Assistance Credit per Single Family Residence (formerly "State Match') Formula: Area Cost Allowance x SPI Square Feet per student x Funding Assistance % x Student Factor D 1 (Elementary) $200.40 90 0.5747 0.257 $2.663.88 D 2 (Middle School) $200.40 117 0 0.070 $0 D 3 (Senior High) $200.40 130 00 138 $0 D `y $2,663.88 Tax Credit per Single Family Residence Average SF Residential Assessed Value $288,605 Current Debt Service Rate! $1,000 $1.41 Current Bond Interest Rate 3.68% Years Amortized (10 Years) 10 TC b $3,276,08 Developer Provided Facility Credit Facility / Site Value Dweliin Units 0 0 FC b 0 Fee Recap A = Site Acquisition per SF Residence B = Permanent Facility Cost per Residence C = Temporary Facility Cost per Residence Subtotal D = State Match Credit per Residence TC = Tax Credit per Residence Subtotal $1,354.95 $14,492.29 $72.82 $15,920.06 $2,663.88 $3,276.08 $6,939.96 Total Unfunded Need $9.980.10 50% Developer Fee Obligation $4,990 FC = Facility Credit (if applicable) 0 Net Fee Obligation per Residence - Single Family $4,990 Kent School District Six -Year Capital Facilities Plan June 2015 Page 30 KENT SCHOOL DISTRICT IMPACT FEE CALCULATION for MULTI -FAMILY RESIDENCE Site Acquisition Cost per Multi -Family Residence Unit Formula: ((Acres x Cost per Acre)/ Facility Capacity) x Student( I Required Site Acreage I Average Site Co A 1 (Elementary) 11 $287,573 A2 (MiddleSchool) 21 $0 A 3 (Senior High) 32 $0 Permanent Facility Construction Cost per Multi -Family Residence Unit Formula: ((Facility Cost / Facility Capacity) x Student Factor) x (Permanen' 600 0.111 $585.21 1,065 0.022 $0 1,000 O.D39 $0 0.172 A 4, $585-21 B 1 (Elementary) $35.025,000 600 0.111 0.964 $6,246.36 B 2 (Middle School) $0 1,065 0.022 0.964 $0 B 3 (Senior High) $0 1,600 0.039 0.964 $0 0.172 B 41 $6,246.36 Temporary Facility Cost per Multi -Family Residence Unit Formula: ((Facility Cost / Facility Capa ' ) x Student Factor) x (temporary 1 Total Square Footage Ratio) Fedltty Gust FatlRty Gapadty Studerrt Factor Footage Ratio C 1 (Elementary) $200,000 24 0.111 0.034 $31.45 C 2 (Middle School) $0 29 0,022 0.034 $0 C 3 (Senior High) $0 31 0.039 0.034 $0 0.172 C: $31 A5 State Funding Assistance Credit per Multi -Family Residence (formerly "State Match') Formula: Area Cost Allowance x SPI Square Fast per student x Funding Assistance % x Student Factor I Area Coat Allowance I SPI Sq. Ft / Student I Equalization % I Student Factor D 1 (Elementary) $200.40 90 0.5747 0.111 $1150.55 D 2 (Middle School) $200.40 117 0 D.022 $0 D 3 (Senior High) $200.40 130 0 0.039 $0 D b $1,150.65 Tax Credit per Mufti -Family Residence Unit Average MF Residential Assessed Value $114,153 Current Debt Service Rate 1$1,000 $1.41 Current Bond Interest Rate 3.68% Years Amortized (10 Years) 10 TC b $1,386.90 Developer Provided Facility Credit Facility / Site Value DwePo Units 0 0 FC b 0 Fee Recap A = Site Acquisition per Multi -Family Unit B = Permanent Facility Cost per MF Unit C - Temporary Facility Cost per MF Unit Subtotal D = State Match Credit per MF Unit TC = Tax Credit per MF Unit Subtotal $585.21 $6,246.38 $31.45 $6,863.02 $1,150.55 $1,386.90 $2,537.45 Total Unfunded Need $4,325.57 50% Developer Fee Obligation $2,163 FC - Facility Credit (if applicable) 0 Net Fee Obligation per Residential Unit - Multi -family $2,163 Kent School District Six -Year Capital Facilities Plan April 2015 Page 31 The Capital Facilities Plan (the "Plan") is updated annually based on previous Plans in effect since 1993. The primary changes from the April 2014 Plan are summarized here. Changes to capacity continue to reflect fluctuations in class size as well as program changes. Changes in portables or transitional capacity reflect use, lease or purchase, sale, surplus and/or movement between facilities. The student headcount enrollment forecast is updated annually. All Elementary schools now have Full Day Kindergarten so six -year Kindergarten projections were previously modified to meet the requirements for Full Day Kindergarten programs at all Elementary schools. The district expects to receive some State Funding Assistance (formerly called "state matching funds") for projects in this Plan and tax credit factors are updated annually. Unfunded site and facility needs will be reviewed in the future. Due to the decrease in the student generation factor for both single family and multi- family housing the District is reducing the impact fees for both classes. For single family housing the fee will be $4,990 from $5,486 a decrease of $496 or 9%. For multi -family the fee will be $2,163 from $3,378 a decrease of $1,215 or 36%. Changes to Impact Fee Calculation Factors include: Student Generation Factor Elam 0.484 0.257 Single Family (SF) MS 0.129 0.070 SH 0.249 0,138 Total 0.866 0,465 -.401 Student Generation Factor Elam 0.324 0.111 Multi -Family (MF) MS 0.066 0,022 SH 0,118 0.039 Total 0.522 0.172 -.350 State Funding Assistance Ratios Mtata Match') 58.14% 57.47% Per OSPI website Area Cost Allowance (former Boeckh Index) $200,40 $200.40 Per DSPI website Average Assessed Valuation (AV) SF $245,871 $288,606 Puget Sound ESD AV - Average of Condominiums & Apts. MF $87,880 $114,153 Puget Sound ESD Debt Service Capital Levy Rate / $1000 $1.68 $1.41 Per King Co. Assessor Report General Obligation Bond Interest Rate 4.04% 4.68% Bloomberg Bond Buyer Index Impact Fee - Single Family SF $5,486 $4,990 Decrease of $496 or 9% Impact Fee - Multi -Family MF $3,378 $2,163 Decrease of $1,216 or 36% Kent School District Six -Year Capital Facilities Plan June 2015 Page 32 h J N V Q Z O r(L U 'p 50 r J Z O > U , f/J r _ W U Y a U I„ z T} z} T z T} z} Z Y T z T} z}}}}} z z T T T z 2 S p a p 0O w o C N N w n m W o O 0 b o O e O o b 0 0 m O o e M W O o O 0 O 0 O 0 0 b O 0 N o O e O e O e O o O M W O A o O 0 W o O W N o l7 ro N p W C o F m N LL E M Q m m N N p C@ m N OaI r m W m W M Q Q m O W M N y O ,fl M1 O O m p p N a w ai m T $ m N m O Q O W m W W Q Q p N O N O O N W f0 W p V 0 W C W O O MW WpJ N T � U O N o i/, m - R U O LL E m a a° n E N Q W N W Q W W W O N W M W A 0) M A O b M p N N O b y N gg O y O W A A A R m O m gg N W M m m Q O� p M N Y a o N W W Q b N M W Q p N M1 M O r M b M M W b M1 p � N b Q p N M N a w U m n R U � m a m U VV V Q p Q p p M N p M Yl Q Q Q Q V p M M Q m M pj m b m m � Z a N U U W W S Y Y 2 6 N Q U O U -Ui F S¢ N N N U m a r E C ❑ H O W '� m u ; R Y W m 0 T N G N m T ; y E W b Y E $ Y Y N C w U rn e a __ 6 3 app m m a Y Wi c e E m m m o L¢ in 3 w c E p Y° 3 S E y c m C m C O C N N y 'm 9= Z' .G L Oy r m m C m C m `m m o m E m °m `o `w e a$ 'a `w w U U U U W W LL U' U' U' S Y Y g Z 1 m 0. 4 K N N N N O1 Y E mO c w e U R w Q� O D a C Z Y m N 6 N m � C q O N N � m 2 m M o N LL U N o a r w � W Y � a LL O U) d b m N C U a a 2 E X v o 0, o Z v 3 N W Q 7 a m Y a N d N ti m � IL To n 'm y O N N R c m m m U m y a O R n m t Y c > oLL == a s L c m = L C R R O a N y, C m Y o � u m m O � � m o a t m m m > a O m LL m L L n `C U R m N U m R O Ede, } X d m m m w W Fj R v in C 0 O L m VI m Y W 2 O us h }:3 Ld ul Q Z 4 G w w f U. O C W y O Q O Q 7 N O N p m � O O fh O O OJ O (0 6i ISl Q W 6 Q � c m E O O d C i u Q F N 4. a eu m w m N bd � U m E m m a m d E m p� 4 j N N N O V O O a` a° P U N � E p� 0 a om o m E e a U o E o W � we Q W � m M g W J W m V /O M 4 N 4i N O c7 m Q W N M M a V a 11 3 U Z a C�'a T R o a O O a {S.m4 to m S h PC eA7 y c mm Q � t Y o U E O V O W l W [0 O N V p ry Q N c (V N ri C W �O N e O M O ro p N m N Ti T [0 atyy W N lV P r W `ry N m N m � V m 2? ,tLL,Q T O N M n O N U O a a a Q � E W IZ 4 E 5 UUmm a r r0 N h 6 Q R N M Q Q L O N CN m V o € w v m u ® N _W Ez O :2 ¢ W N N N N m N N o 12 K E L E � Q 2 LD w L y a c NcN c C mem Ym 1m ¢ N p 5 Y Y Y O O E N a m U M N oS a P O 1 N K M M N O O y N � $ M U N N � m N y Dmi _a � m m fd U N wi m � `O m N � � r m � a N � $� N N m o o m a � N ON A � N o ZO fL m p yMj O O N c C C V O O � T h O m M N K �q � LL m y U S N N 46 � ¢ N OO N m Q d W 0 2 O !A .iS o t� p M W .. �o 100 m '� n b N 49 o O G N F `:' v 'c p m CL a g y 4t U u 7 25 N 0 0 0 0 d 0 a$ d d d d d d d d .i o d o d d d d d d ry d d O o o d d d d d d d d d d d d d d _ p p SS 88 pppp pppp pppp 11pp 88 OpOp SS pp�� pp pp pppp SS pppp p p SS SS pppp 88 O O O O O O O 0 0 S O S S 0 u N O p p O 0 0 0 0 0 O d O O d d C d C O d d d O d G O O d O 0 0 d O O G Ci 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Is d 0 0 e g a p ,•� � S„ $ m m 25 m o ci m m o m o S o m 6 d d 0 0 0 0 0 0 m V a d d o d d d o d d o o d d d o d o d d d 0 d o d O o p o d o d O d 0 a m GNLGGX w S mO S pp 8 8 8 pV S 8 p p p 8 8 S p p p S O O N O lmV1 O RI O O 1V M �n M S ti N N g H jp Q fY Q O O O O 1(� �D O V {�O O O O O lO O O O N 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ey N O .y 0 0 0 0 0 O O ro O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ey O O O C O O d O F N N_ N f N w N N ei Q F � N a W n, O N O O O� O O r➢ n O ti N O �° N M q� O N O O ei N O a0 � O ei O N .r p� O O O N O PI m 0 F c e a c Z a 0 � 0 a o � � 2 E d nn p > 12 '� a N h m a¢ qo L g 0 a a a a a ®_m u u v u 8 8 3 u� S O S S O a M N a��i S Vf O O O N O 'i M O N N O S S O S N O O N O O O ti 0 N O O G O G C C O O O O O O O O O O O O a 0 0 0 d C C O a 6 O 6 0 0 0 0 0 6 G C C C p S 8 S pp S p 8 yy 8 S 8 8 sy}� pppp 88 pO S p p 8 } N O O M S O S 00 O S LL m �M-1 O O O O O en-1 0 0 0 O O O O 0 0 0 O O O O C O C 0 0 0 0 C O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0i 0 6 o 0 0 o 0 0 0 O 0 0 O O p 0 6 Ci 0 0 0 0 0 5 _O QQ QQ ss gg gg go o 6 o o O O � S e o �.aj E c4i, g g o v 0 cd d a 0 0 6 6 d o o d o o a c a o o c d o d 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o o o o a d o 0 0 c 9 a W S Op ¢qqy� $ O 8 p Cp V SS S S S O O S S S 8 O O S S O y V 0 O vf`I, O S %g .Ni O W O AOf, YZ Vi O N t�A, 0 .Wi O O O vpi O O O O O O vW1 N o o 0 0 o 0 0 0 c o 0 0 0 o c o c o c o 0 0 0 0 o c c c o 0 0 0 0 o c o o O o F N N e1 N_ O O O O O O aY ill N„< O O O O H O M es O N e+ O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O M Lp W '1 M N z W O O O O O O O M O O O V v1 h E N a W W N eel W ei H �A W +R O F ti M M e'1 N 't W If1 O q � C C a C d M O 6 � q O m N �' M 2 N N M A' 3A 3C Gry O wry^, D O E D 0 0 Z Z Z LL d Z y iR 6'a Wy �1 C t 9 'i Yn V E E E L d O LL LO g r N N '' p A oC OY e0 = 0 0 0 r L ryry Yd Y W W W W LL LL LL LL LL LL IL 4 fY LL I•J � (J (7 (7 x x S S S= 2 x x�� Y Y Y Y Y X y d I A, m .•� 0 0 o D S S 0 �sj `d'. g g'^. N `$ n n S N O O p m o O O N O O O 0• O O O O O O O O O O O O pp G O O OP O 0• G OS C O O O o O Ci O Cop O O�� O �} pp S p O 8 S S 8 8 S 0 O m 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o D 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 a c O o o c c � a m 88 S 8 pp 88 SW pQS pp 8 pp pp 88 p pp a Cod pp 88 pp p O O O O N O N O M O C 08 Ci 0 G C O G O O Ci G G O O Ci G G 6 G C O C Ci O Ci ro 0 0 0 0 0 Ci 0 0 0 C O O G 0 d d w .0 N8 pp tppp SS op pp qm 09pp 8 8 O� p� p 88 oo eQep 8 8 8$ V O m N O r O? 0 0 0 0 M N M Q r a o O N m O 0 0 0 h g O O V O O O M O o o ni o 0 0 0 o c c o 0 0 0 o c c c o 0 0 0 0 0 .. ry o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o c c 0 w OO o ry N o u, x ve OooOo m.-� mN o 00 0 00..00.-� o o.+v a oo ro.•�.�o a omO o O.a o Z W = N f M d w w O r N C d o d • -O -NO � fj C � Vp�I � > 3o OD• � � � y .� y � iry d LL S S C V=1 i L C F 00 d J Y C U d 0 W 3 d D Q 2 O ul ap m L n> a rn 0 C O d d d d d d a L y C 6 g 9 c c y A A d d W O d N C p j T. 'y d d W d O _'°t O O O 6 C C Y Y u Y �_3p _�. O 9 g g g g i z° z° a° S O N N N N N O O O N O O O o d O O O Oe!OOOOO O o 0 o c a o a o a o 0 0 o c o a a 0 0 o a o o a a a x G gg gg g o m C O W y� a O OO o o O O O G O a a G O o O O O a a G C O O a a p O a a a OO a O a OO a s G O F W 0 p p pp W S pp 8 8 S p p 8 8 8 8 pp pp pp ttpp SS o ry b N O N M ti O O O O eni P O O O O O O O N O O O< O N O O M O O m V 0 v0f O "e v 0 0 o o 0 0 o d o 0 0 a o 6 0 0 0 o d a 6 d d a o 0 0 o d a d a d d a a o 0 0 o 0 9 w N qqpp88 88��yy 8 pppp 88 88 88 88 aa 8888 SS 88 0 0 0 N� O n N 8 n M N N O S m S M N N ti q O O a O O 0 0 0< O O Ui O a OO O O O O O O O O O O O C O O O a O a O O O O a O a O O a OO H O a O O O N O F N x N M W � � O O O m d N 0 t0 N N W O W O O O ry O e4 O„ W O O O Iff O d 'i O O ei N O M Y} O T ti f N N w � O O N� cp T 0 a VI Vl T O„ o ry O m o '1 O W ti o O p W O w H o O n a o W d o Yf ro m 0 r p p CC N N VI M N M N M � N C 7 C a E a m o 0 a _ °' 12z❑ a � �❑ s F r m i- � ay E E s o o❑ `m LL E c a' ''R '^ a x i o f LL w 'u a w v M� O n � ti V 2 p CN W N i ?�jj m ro Od0 m W L S a R$ � O C C L qC_ p p p 1 6 Q C 6 [G K LG 6 K W K CC W VI N Am N N N Vni VI N VI 0 Val F i� F N d S 1p mM S tMp 8 S pp N M O N p� R 8 O O O O O O O O O O O O O O ® O O O O O O O O G C O O e8Y O M A= p QQ 8 8 S 8 �ppOpp 8 S 88O O O O eNi O O O O p O H S y ,Q O O S S �y y p O� O� 0 0O O Cl 0 0 O Ci O Ci Ci C 0 0 0 L O Yj O O O O O O u1 a 0 O. LL M p O O Ci 0 0 0 0 0 0 Ci 0 0 F 'Sj O ti O O S O F N (V O O e�•I N d n ry S N O E eWi o o p o c o N 17 O O O O N O O of ei y a I c a c w y yp� p 0p S C ry ry .mi, .Ni .wi O S V m O N N N T n m dy pf S S S M o Vf o V n� ti � Mp S m N O O F � G F- G µ a ti O d N O O YI O M O M d O N N M O O M N O O N N 1� ei N O m M h 11q Itl •y [11 2 M 2 0 0 •+ .i 0 0 0 ap .-i O O O O N O �D N � m 0 0 0 0 0 ey d M .-� .y O M e4 !V N 2 = W W M N ~ N w w u w N M M M PI M 1O Po d rvd w- m n n '-� � e ti .�• �n N .Ni a�� m .� ry O ti ry a r� m� H� tQ .i� � W i y� vi w IW- h w o r E Da O LL p a a > v�i N N O o w E79 !, ,`, F y c a mm a w a w U G `• O L' W A C _ IL e1 OaY O 0 C C n c 1 p! O c 0 'O V O U a II a II 2 O a m N �. W 1'e a w a X z Q SIX -YEAR CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN 2015-2021 Renton School District No. 403 Board of Directors Pam Teal, President Denise Eider, Vice President Lynn Desmarais Todd Franceschina Al Talley Sheryl Moore, Acting Superintendent __7_1004 May 27, 2015 SIX -YEAR CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN 2015-2021 Renton School District No. 403 Board of Directors Pam Teal, President Denise Eider, Vice President Lynn Desmarais Todd Franceschina Al Talley Sheryl Moore, Acting Superintendent The Renton School District Capital Facilities Plan was prepared with the help of the following organizations and individuals: Renton School District Staff John Knutson, Assistant Superintendent, Finance and Operations Richard Stracke, Executive Director, Facilities and Planning Stewart Shusterman, Facilities Project Manager The 2015 — 2021 Capital Facilities Plan was approved by the Renton School District Board of Directors on May 27, 2015 May 27, 2015 SIX -YEAR CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN 2015-2021 TABLE OF CONTENTS I. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ...................................... I II. CAPACITY METHODOLOGY .................................. 4 III. INVENTORY AND CAPACITY OF FACILTIES ................... 5 IV. ENROLLMENT PROJECTIONS ............................... 11 V. ENROLLMENT DRIVEN FACILITY NEEDS .................... 13 VI. SIX -YEAR FINANCE PLAN .................................. 15 VII. IMPACT FEES ............................................. 17 VIII. APPENDICES ............................................. 21 Capital Facilities Plan 2015 - 2021 Renton School District No. 403 I. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY This Six -Year Capital Facilities Plan (the "Plan") was prepared by Renton School District (the "District") in compliance with the requirements of the Washington State Growth Management Act (GMA, the Act), King County Code Title 21A.43, and applicable ordinances of the cities of Renton, Newcastle and Bellevue. It is the intent of the District that the Plan be adopted by King County and the cities of Bellevue, Newcastle and Renton as a sub -element of the Capital Facilities Plan element of their respective Comprehensive Plans, so that those municipalities may assess and collect school impact fees on behalf of the District, as empowered by the GMA. However, this Plan is not intended to be the sole planning instrument developed by the District to determine its capital facility needs. The GMA was adopted by the State legislature in 1990 in response to rapidly increasing development; most notably in King County and the surrounding central Puget Sound area. The Act requires state and local governments to manage Washington's growth by developing and implementing comprehensive land -use and transportation plans, by designating Urban Growth Areas, and by protecting natural resources and environmentally critical areas. One element of the Comprehensive Plan required of county and city governments is the Capital Facilities Plan. It is this element that addresses existing public facility capacities, forecasts future public facility needs, presents a plan for expanding existing facilities or constructing new facilities to meet those needs, and indicates how those public facility improvements are to be financed. The GMA empowers jurisdictions to assess and collect impact fees as one means of financing new public facilities necessitated by private development. This Capital Facilities Plan addresses the impact of growth on public school facilities by examining: 1. anticipated growth of the District's student population over the next six years; 2. the ability of existing and proposed classroom facilities to adequately house those students based on the District's current Standard of Service; 3. the need for additional enrollment driven capital facilities; 4. the method of financing those capital improvements; and 5. calculation of school impact fees based on, among other variables, the number of students generated by recent residential development (student generation factors). This plan is updated annually and submitted to local governments for inclusion as a sub - element in their Capital Facilities Plans. Past Plans have been adopted by King County and the Cities of Bellevue, Newcastle and Renton. The District is currently engaged in -1- Capital Facilities Plan 2015 - 2021 Renton School District No. 403 dialogue with the City of Tukwila regarding implementation of impact fees within their jurisdiction. Enrollment Projections: Enrollment projections provided by the Office of Superintendent of Public Instruction (OSPI), as adjusted by Renton School District, indicate a 14.7% increase in K-12 student enrollment over the next six years, with the highest growth rate, 20.0%, occurring at the K- 5 level. Projected K-12 enrollment for the 2020-2021 school year is 17,104, an increase of 2,186 over the actual October 1, 2014 headcount of 14,327. Current Capacity: Student capacity of current permanent K-12 facilities, excluding designated special education classrooms and facilities housing special programs, is 15,092. Based on current enrollment (October 1 headcount), the District is showing a deficit of permanent facilities at both the Elementary and Middle School levels, while high school facilities enjoy a comfortable surplus. Current capacity deficits are overcome by the use of relocatable classrooms (portables), which are not included in the permanent facility inventory. Relocatable classrooms are used to address enrollment fluctuations and to house students on a temporary basis until permanent facilities can be constructed. They are not considered a long-term solution for housing students. Enrollment Projections/Future Capacity: Based on the District's enrollment projections, significant increases are anticipated at all grade levels over the next six years. Existing surplus capacity at High School facilities appears sufficient to cover projected student growth at that level. However, growth at the elementary and middle school levels requires construction of new permanent facilities, as well as the reallocation of existing, or acquisition of new, relocatable classrooms. With the passage of the 2012 Bond Measure in April 2012, funding was secured for the design and construction of the new Middle School No. 4, scheduled to open Fall 2016. With a student capacity of 850, the new facility will result in a surplus middle school capacity of 187 in the fall of 2020, based on current enrollment projections,. Those same enrollment projections indicate that there will be a deficit in the capacity of elementary school facilities of 2,147 by the year 2020. While the 2012 bond measure does address the acquisition of property for future development, funding for design and construction of one or more new elementary schools will require passage of a future bond initiative. Until such time, current and future deficits at the elementary level will be accommodated by use of relocatable classrooms. - 2 - Capital Facilities Plan 2015 - 2021 Renton School District No. 403 Capital Construction Plan: For the next six years, the District's highest priority will be the construction of new school facilities to accommodate past and projected growth. This includes; construction of the new Middle School No. 4, currently in progress and funded by the 2012 bond measure; the design and construction of two new elementary schools, the focus of a 2016 bond initiative currently in its early planning stage; acquisition of land for future development; and the purchase of new portable classrooms. Other high priority capital improvements fall into five major categories; safety and security, energy conservation, roofing upgrades, facility enhancements and site improvements. Improvements will occur district -wide, affecting nearly all District facilities, achieving and maintaining the level of service necessary to provide safe, healthy, and nurturing learning environments for all our students. The majority of these projects are not enrollment driven. A list summarizing projects covered under the 2012 bond measure is included in the Appendix. Information on the proposed 2016 bond will become available as the program develops. Finance Plan: The primary funding sources for capital facilities projects over the next six years are the remaining bond monies from the 2012 and 2008 bond measures, school impact fees currently being collected by King County and the cities of Bellevue, Newcastle and Renton, state funding available through the Office of Superintendent of Public Instruction, and a future bond initiative. Impact Fees: Impact fees were calculated in conformance with King County Council Ordinance 11621, Attachment A. Both single and multi -family impact fees have increased over last year's, primarily as a result of the re-evaluation of the District's elementary and middle school cost models. Equally significant are factors beyond the District's control that determine the fee, such as interest rates, assessed values of housing, and the number of students generated by new residential development. For the past several years the District has voluntarily limited fee increases to the previous year's rate of inflation, as reported by the King County Office of Economic and Financial Analysis. The rate of inflation for last year, based on the Seattle Consumer Price Index (CPI-U), was 1.84%. A comparison of current and previous year's fees is as follows: Previous Year Current Year Change Single -Family $5,541 $5,643 $102 Multi -Family $1,360 $1,385 $25 - 3 - Capital Facilities Plan 2015 - 2021 Renton School District No. 403 -4- Capital Facilities Plan 2015 - 2021 Renton School District No. 403 II. CAPACITY METHODOLOGY STANDARD OF SERVICE The Renton School District Standard of Service is the standard adopted by the District that identifies the program year, school organizational structure, student/teacher ratios by grade level (taking into account the requirements of students with special needs), daily class schedule, types of facilities and other factors identified by the District to be beneficial in supporting its educational programs and objectives. The Standard of Service is the major determining factor, together with the number of classrooms or teaching stations, in calculating facility capacity. The District has adopted a traditional elementary/middle/high school organizational structure that houses kindergarten through Grade 5 in elementary schools, Grades 6 through 8 in middle schools and Grades 9 through 12 in high schools. The school -year calendar adopted by the District is also traditional, beginning in early September and ending in mid - June, as is the daily schedule, with classes beginning between 7:20 and 9:30 a.m. and ending between 2:03 and 3:10 p.m., dependent on grade level. The District and the Renton Education Association recognize that reasonable class size is necessary for optimum learning, and have established the following student/teacher ratios: Primary (K-3) 24:1 Intermediate (4-5) 29:1 Secondary (6-12) 29:1 The 29:1 ratio at the secondary level applies to all Language Arts, Social Studies, Science, Math, World Languages, World Language Exploratory and Health classes. Other ratios apply as follows: Band/Orchestra 40:1 Choir 50:1 Middle School PE 35:1 High School PE 40:1 All other classes 31:1 Student /teacher ratios for special education classes held in self-contained classrooms are not addressed in this Plan. Similarly, educational facilities dedicated solely to special education programs or alternative learning experiences are excluded from these capacity calculations, as are associated student headcounts. -5- Capital Facilities Plan 2015 - 2021 Renton School District No. 403 Above student/teacher ratios are applicable to both permanent and relocatable classrooms. However, inasmuch as relocatable facilities do not generally allow for the full range of educational activities promoted by the District, they are generally viewed as temporary or interim housing, necessary to accommodate enrollment fluctuations and development driven enrollment increases, but only until such time as permanent facilities can be financed and constructed. They are not viewed as a long-term solution to rising enrollment or deficit facility capacity. For those reasons, capacities of relocatable classrooms are calculated, but not used to determine future facility needs. PRACTICAL CAPACITY MODEL The Practical Capacity Model calculates building capacity based on limitations that existing facilities place on enrollment due to existing educational programs, operating policy and contractual restrictions. The calculation is made by reviewing the use of each room in each facility. For every room housing students, a calculation is made assigning a maximum number of students per room. Sometimes core facilities, such as size of cafeteria or size of gym, number of restrooms or size and number of specialty areas such as shops, limit enrollment to levels below that expected by room occupancy levels. Capacity at the secondary school level is further limited by scheduling limitations and student course selection. If rooms are utilized by staff for their planning period in a six period day, capacity is limited to 83% (5/6) of the theoretical capacity. Since secondary schools offer a number of elective courses, many courses will not attract a full classroom of students. Another factor that has influenced facility capacity at the elementary school level is the change from half -day to full -day kindergarten. Beginning with the current school year, all kindergarten classes throughout the District are full -day. This change alone created the need for 7 additional kindergarten classrooms in 2014-15, effectively decreasing overall permanent elementary school facility capacity by 168. Beyond full -day kindergarten, reduced student/teacher ratios as prescribed by the McCleary Act would significantly reduce building capacity if fully implemented. A complete inventory of District facilities, including capacities, is provided in Section III. Capital Facilities Plan 2015 - 2021 Renton School District No. 403 III. INVENTORY AND CAPACITY OF FACILITIES Renton School District's capital facilities include both permanent structures and relocatable (portable) classrooms. Permanent facilities are further categorized as either K-12 (traditional elementary, middle and high school configurations), Special Instructional Use or Non -instructional Support Facilities. The District maintains a total of 30 permanent and 49 relocatable facilities serving a total student population of 15,057. The District's K-12 facilities include 14 elementary schools, 3 middle schools, 3 high schools and a Secondary Learning Center. Four Special Instructional Use facilities house the District's early childhood, special education and alternative educational programs. Support facilities include Kohlwes Education Center (admin.), Transportation Center, Facilities Operations and Maintenance Center, Nutrition Services/Warehouse, Renton Memorial Stadium and the Lindbergh Swimming Pool. Total permanent facilities encompass 2,421,229 square feet, with 2,243,813 square feet (93%) devoted to K-12 and instructional special use. See Appendix A for District Maps. Relocatable facilities are used primarily to address enrollment fluctuations and to house students on a temporary basis until permanent facilities can be constructed. For those reasons they are not considered a long-term solution for housing students and are not acknowledged in the calculation of the capacity of K-12 facilities. Of the 49 relocatable facilities in the District's inventory, 30 are "double portables" containing two classrooms, providing the district with a total of 79 relocatable classrooms encompassing 70,784 square feet of additional instructional space. Table 1 below summarizes existing K-12 facility capacity. A complete inventory of District facilities, including undeveloped property, follows. Facility capacity worksheets may be found in Appendix B. EXISTING FACILITY CAPACITY Type YP Elementary Schools Middle Schools High Schools Total Permanent 6,816 3,120 5,156 15,092 Relocatable 1,104 598 144 1,846 Total 7,920 3,718 5,300 16,938 Table 1 7- Capital Facilities Plan 2015 - 2021 Renton School District No. 403 J O O U V) Q H Z w w J W w U w Ln H o: O a a Z) Ln INVENTORY AND CAPACITY OF PERMANENT FACILITIES NAME LOCATION AREA (sq. ft.) CAPACITY Benson Hill 18665 - 116TH Ave. SE, Renton, WA 98058 67,533 520 Bryn Mawr 8212 S 118th St., Seattle, WA 98178 49,157 424 Campbell Hill 6418 S 124th St., Seattle, WA 98178 57,072 400 Cascade 16022 - 116th Ave. SE, Renton, WA 98058 59,164 494 Hazelwood 7100 - 116th Ave. SE, Newcastle, WA 98056 66161 542 Highlands 2727 NE 7th St., Renton, WA 98056 60,000 542 Honey Dew 800 Union Ave. NE, Renton, WA 98059 54,620 398 Kennydale 1700 NE 28th st., Renton, WA 98056 65,169 568 Lakeridge 7400 S 115th St., Seattle, WA 98178 52,958 426 Maplewood Heights 130 Jericho Ave., Renton, WA 98059 56,220 516 Renton Park 16828 - 128th Ave. SE, Renton, WA 98058 65,955 546 Sierra Heights 2501 Union Ave. NE, Renton, WA 98058 53,992 540 Talbot Hill 2300 Talbot Road, Renton, WA 98055 57,844 474 Tiffany Park 1601 Lake Youngs Way, Renton, WA 98058 58,758 426 Total Grades K-5 Capacity 824,603 6,816 Dimmitt 12320 - 80th Ave. S, Seattle 98178 109,070 1,066 McKnight 2600 NE 12th St., Renton, WA 98056 126,706 1,066 Nelsen 2403 Jones Ave. S, Renton, WA 98055 124,234 988 Total Grades 6-8 Capacity 360,010 3,120 Hazen 1101 Hoquiam Ave. NE, Renton, WA 98059 327,395 1,632 Lindbergh 16426 - 128th Ave. SE, Renton, WA 98058 242,662 1,296 Renton 400 S 2nd St., Renton, WA 98057 278,373 1,752 Secondary Learning Center 7800 S 132nd St, Renton, WA 98178 70,831 476 Total Grades 9-12 Capacity 919,261 5,156 Total Grade Levels K-12 2,103,874 15,092 Meadow Crest ECC 1800 Index Ave. NE, Renton, WA 98056 68,752 464 Sartori Education Center 315 Garden Ave. N, Renton, WA 98057 39,345 310 HOME Program - Spring Glen 2607 Jones Ave. S, Renton, WA 98055 7,005 147 Renton Academy - Spring Glen 2607 Jones Ave. S, Renton, WA 98055 24,837 50 Total Instructional Special Use 139,939 971 Total Instructional Facilities 2,243,813 16,063 Facilities Operations Center 7812 S 124th St., Seattle, WA 98178 21,894 Kohlwes Educational Center 300 SW 7th St., Renton, WA 98055 57,000 Lindbergh Pool 16740 - 128th Ave. SE, Renton, WA 98058 13,600 Nutrition Services/Warehouse 409 S Tobin St., Renton, WA 98057 27,466 Renton Memorial Stadium 405 Logan Ave. N, Renton, WA 98055 37,213 Transportation Center 420 Park Ave. N, Renton, WA 98057 20,243 Total Support Services 177,416 Total All Permanent Facilities 2,421,229 Capital Facilities Plan 2015 - 2021 Renton School District No. 403 INVENTORY AND CAPACITY OF RELOCATABLE CLASSROOMS NUMBER OF AREA STUDENT BLDG.ID LOCATION CLASSROOMS (sq.ft.) CAPACITY 16 Maplewood Heights Elementary 1 896 24 19 Maplewood Heights Elementary 1 896 24 20 Lindbergh High 1 896 24 34 Maplewood Heights Elementary 1 896 24 53 McKnight Middle 2 1,792 52 54 Nelsen Middle 2 1,792 52 55 Nelsen Middle 2 1,792 52 56 Nelsen Middle 2 1,792 52 57 Nelsen Middle 2 1,792 52 58 Maplewood Heights Elementary 1 896 24 59 Lindbergh High 1 896 24 60 Lindbergh High 1 896 24 61 Lindbergh High 1 896 24 62 Talbot Hill Elementary 1 896 24 63 Cascade Elementary 1 896 24 64 Talbot Hill Elementary 1 896 24 65 Dimmitt Middle 1 896 26 66 Dimmitt Middle 1 896 26 68 Sierra Heights Elementary 1 896 24 69 Honey Dew Elementary 2 1,792 48 70 Talbot Hill Elementary 1 896 24 71 Sierra Heights Elementary 1 896 24 72 McKnight Middle 2 1,792 52 73 Lakeridge Elementary 2 1,792 48 74 Sierra Heights Elementary 2 1,792 48 77 McKnight Middle 2 1,792 52 78 McKnight Middle 2 1,792 52 79 Dimmitt Middle 2 1,792 52 80 Honey Dew Elementary 2 1,792 48 81 Cascade Elementary 2 1,792 48 82 Sierra Heights Elementary 2 1,792 48 83 Lindbergh High 2 1,792 48 84 Maplewood Heights Elementary 2 1,792 48 85 Dimmitt Middle 1 896 26 86 Dimmitt Middle 1 896 26 87 Dimmitt Middle 1 896 26 88 Bryn Mawr Elementary 2 1,792 48 89 Bryn Mawr Elementary 2 1,792 48 90 Honey Dew Elementary 2 1,792 48 91 Honey Dew Elementary 2 1,792 48 92 Tiffany Park Elementary 2 1,792 48 93 Spring Glen/H.O.M.E. Program 2 1,792 48 94 Spring Glen/H.O.M.E. Program 2 1,792 48 95 Campbell Hill Elementary 2 1,792 48 96 Campbell Hill Elementary 2 1,792 48 97 Cascade Elementary 2 1,792 48 98 Cascade Elementary 2 1,792 48 99 Lakeridge Elementary 2 1,792 48 100 Lakeridge Elementary 2 1,792 48 Totals 79 70,784 1,942 "0 Capital Facilities Plan 2015 - 2021 Renton School District No. 403 RELOCATABLE FACILITY CAPACITY BY SITE RELOCATABLE AREA LOCATION ADDRESS FACILITY ID (sq. ft.) CAPACITY ELEMENTARY SCHOOLS Bryn Mawr 8212 S 118th St., Seattle 98178 88,89 3,584 96 Campbell Hill 6418 S 124th St., Seattle, WA 98178 95,96 3,584 96 Cascade 16022 116th Ave. SE, Renton 98058 63, 81, 97, 98 6,272 168 Honeydew 800 Union Ave. NE, Renton 98059 69, 80, 90, 91 7,168 192 Lakeridge 7400 S 115th St., Seattle 98178 73, 99, 100 5,376 144 Maplewood Heights 130 Jericho Ave. SE, Renton 98059 16, 19, 34, 58, 84 5,376 144 Sierra Heights 2501 Union Ave. NE, Renton 98059 68, 71, 74, 82 5,376 144 Talbot Hill 2300 Talbot Rd. S, Renton 98055 62, 64, 70 2,688 72 Tiffany Park 1601 Lake Youngs Way, Renton, 98058 92 1,792 48 Elementary School Total 41,216 1,104 MIDDLE SCHOOLS Dimmitt 12320 80th Ave. S, Seattle 98078 65, 66, 79, 85, 86, 87 6,272 182 McKnight 1200 Edmonds Ave. NE, Renton 98056 53, 72, 77, 78 7,168 208 Nelsen 2403 Jones Ave. S, Renton 98055 54, 55, 56, 57 7,168 208 Middle School Total 20,608 598 HIGH SCHOOLS Li ndbergh 16426 128th Ave. SE, Renton 98058 20, 59, 60, 61, 83 5,376 144 High School Total 5,376 144 SPECIAL EDUCATION Spring Glen 2706 Jones Ave. S, Renton 98055 93,94 3,584 96 Special Education Total 3,584 96 TOTAL ALL RELOCATABLE CLASSROOMS 70,784 1,942 UNDEVELOPED PROPERTY Skyway Site 4.18 acres NW corner S Langston Rd. & 76th Ave. S -10- Capital Facilities Plan 2015 - 2021 Renton School District No. 403 IV. ENROLLMENT PROJECTIONS Renton School District six -year enrollment projections through the 2019-20 school year are based on data published by the Office of the Superintendent of Public Instruction (OSPI). OSPI utilizes the cohort survival method to forecast student enrollment projections for a six -year period based on actual student headcounts documented for the previous six years. Enrollment reports prepared by the District are submitted to OSPI on an annual basis. The District's October 1, 2013 Enrollment Report and OSPI Report No. 1049 are included in Appendix C. Renton School District six -year enrollment projections, found on the following page, reflect adjustments to OSPI's report based on the following: 1. Report structure has been modified to reflect middle school versus junior high school grade level configuration. 2. Headcount includes only K-12 students attending comprehensive instructional facilities and excludes students attending special education facilities or facilities accommodating alternative learning experiences. Current projections indicate significant increased enrollment over the next six years, especially at the elementary and middle school grade levels, with only minor growth at the high school grade levels (Table 2). By the school year 2020-2021, the District expects an overall student enrollment increase of 14.7%, with a 20.0% increase at the elementary school level, a 17.9% increase at the middle school level and a 2.8 % increase at the high school level. PROJECTED ENROLLMENT GROWTH 2014 Headcount 2020-21 Projection Student Increase % Increase Elementary 7,469 8,963 1,494 20.0 Middle 3,210 3,783 573 17.9 High 4,239 4,358 119 2.8 Total 14,918 1 17,104 1 2,186 14.7 Table 2 - 11 - Capital Facilities Plan 2015 - 2021 Renton School District No. 403 Kindergarten Grade 1 Grade 2 Grade 3 Grade 4 Grade 5 Total K - 5 Grade 6 Grade7 Grade 8 Total 6 - 8 Grade 9 Grade 10 Grade 11 Grade 12 Total 9- 12 Total K -12 RENTON SCHOOL DISTRICT No. 403 ENROLLMENT PROJECTIONS BY COHORT SURVIVAL* (KK Linear Projection) --HEADCOUNT-- AVE. % - - - - PROJECTED ENROLLMENTS - - - - 2014 SURVIVAL 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 1,327 1,385 1,424 1,463 1,502 1,541 1,581 1,335 101.96 1,353 1,412 1,452 1,492 1,531 1,571 1,318 100.17 1,337 1,355 1,415 1,454 1,494 1,534 1,232 98.98 1,305 1,324 1,341 1,400 1,440 1,479 1,168 98.74 1,216 1,288 1,307 1,325 1,382 1,421 1,089 99.56 1,163 1,211 1,282 1,301 1,319 1,376 7,469 7,759 8,014 8,260 8,474 8,707 8,963 1,064 96.71 1,053 1,125 1,171 1,240 1,258 1,275 1,044 100.58 1,070 1,059 1,131 1,178 1,247 1,266 1,102 99.56 1,039 1,065 1,055 1,126 1,173 1,242 3,210 3,163 3,249 3,357 3,544 3,679 3,783 1,110 112.87 1,244 1,173 1,203 1,190 1,271 1,324 1,114 89.65 995 1,115 1,052 1,078 1,067 1,140 973 90.06 1,003 896 1,004 947 971 961 1,042 96.12 935 964 861 965 910 933 4,239 4,177 4,149 4,120 4,181 4,220 4,358 14,918 15,099 15,412 15,737 16,199 16,606 17,104 * Information adapted from OSPI Report No. 1049, December 30, 2014. Headcount and projections do not include enrollment at Special Use facilities. -12- Capital Facilities Plan 2015 - 2021 Renton School District No. 403 V. ENROLLMENT DRIVEN FACILITY NEEDS Table 3 compares the current capacity of Renton School District facilities to current and projected enrollment. For the school year 2020-2021, the table indicates a significant deficit of 2,147 at the elementary level and a much less imposing deficit of 663 at the middle school level. Only at the high school level is the current capacity adequate to handle projected 2020 -2021 enrollment. It is clear that the need for additional elementary and middle school facilities is driven by increased enrollment, past and projected. CURRENT AND PROJECTED CAPACITY NEEDS CURRENT PROJECTEb Facility Type Enrollment Permanent Capacity Surplus/(Deficit) 2020-21 Enrollment 2020-21 Sur lust Defic Elementary 7,469 6,816 (653) 8,963 (2,147) Middle Schoc 1 3,210 3,120 (90) 3,783 (663) High School 4,239 5,156 917 4,358 798 Total 14,918 15,092 174 17,104 (2,012) Table 3 Projected surplus/deficit based on current permanent facilities and does not include faci planning, design or construction phase. The 2012 Bond Measure, approved by District voters in April 2012, included several provisions specifically targeting these deficits, including a new middle school and the acquisition of land for future development. A summary of the 2012 Bond Measure can be found in Appendix D. Middle School No. 4, currently under construction and scheduled to open in Fall 2016, will provide the necessary capacity to handle projected enrollment up to and beyond the six -year period addressed by this Plan. The new middle school is located near the northern District boundary, in the City of Newcastle, on the site of the recently demolished Renton Academy/Old Hazelwood Elementary, and adjacent to the new Hazelwood Elementary. At the elementary school level, the 2012 Bond Measure provided for the acquisition of property for future development, but did not include necessary funding for construction of new elementary facilities. Passage of another bond measure is essential to mitigating the current and projected elementary school deficit, and the District is currently planning on putting a new bond measure before the voters in February 2016. Until such time that funds are available, deficits at the elementary school level will have to be addressed temporarily by the use of relocatable classrooms; either new or relocated from other facilities. These costs must also be included in the Six -Year Finance Plan. The Construction Plan/Capacity Matrix on the following page illustrates current capacities and proposed increased capacities in response to projected enrollment increases. Projected capacity surpluses and deficits are tracked for each year of the six -year period covered by this Plan, and are calculated both with and without the inclusion of relocatable classrooms. -13- Capital Facilities Plan 2015 - 2021 Renton School District No. 403 CONTRUCTION PLAN/CAPACITY MATRIX ELEMENTARY SCHOOL: GRADES K-5 ACTUAL I PROJECTED PLAN YEAR I2014 15I 2015-16 1 2016-17 1 2017-18 1 2018-19 1 2019-20 1 2020 21 Permanent Capacity New Construction Total Permanent Capacity Relocatable Capacity New/Relocated Capacity Total Relocatable Capacity Enrollment Surplus/(Deficit) Permanent only Surplus/(Deficit) Permanent & Relocatable 6816 6816 6816 6816 6816 6816 7366 550 550 6816 6816 6816 6816 6816 7366 7916 1104 1104 1344 1464 1584 1680 1680 240 120 1 1 120 96 1104 1344 1464 1584 1680 1680 1680 7469 7759 8014 8260 8474 8707 8963 (653) (943) (1198) (1444) (1658) (1341) (1047) 451 401 266 140 22 339 633 MIDDLE SCHOOL: GRADES 6-8 ACTUAL I PROJECTED PLAN YEAR 12014 151 2015-16 1 2016-17 1 2017-18 1 2018-19 1 2019-20 1 2020 21 Permanent Capacity New Construction Total Permanent Capacity Relocatable Capacity New/Relocated Capacity Total Relocatable Capacity Enrollment Surplus/(Deficit) Permanent only Surplus/(Deficit) Permanent & Relocatable 3120 3120 3120 3970 3970 3970 3970 850 3120 3120 3970 3970 3970 3970 3970 598 598 598 338 78 78 78 (260) (260) 598 598 1 338 78 78 78 78 3210 3163 3249 3357 3544 3679 3783 (90) (43) 721 613 426 291 187 508 555 1059 691 504 369 265 HIGH SCHOOL: GRADES 9-12 ACTUAL I PROJECTED PLAN YEAR 1 2015-16 1 2016-17 1 2017-18 1 2018-19 1 2019-20 1 2020 21 Permanent Capacity New Construction Total Permanent Capacity Relocatable Capacity New/Relocated Capacity Total Relocatable Capacity Enrollment Surplus/(Deficit) Permanent only Surplus/(Deficit) Permanent & Relocatable 4710 4710 4710 4710 4710 4710 4710 1 1 4710 4710 4710 4710 4710 4710 4710 150 150 150 150 150 150 150 150 150 150 150 150 150 150 4239 4177 4149 4120 4181 4220 4358 471 533 561 590 529 490 352 621 683 711 740 679 640 502 -14- Capital Facilities Plan 2015 - 2021 Renton School District No. 403 VI. SIX -YEAR FINANCE PLAN Capital facilities capacity improvements referenced in this Plan will be funded by 2012 bond monies, remaining 2008 bond funds, impact fees and a possible special levy or future bond initiative. The District may also be eligible for OSPI school construction assistance. Recently completed Meadow Crest Early Childhood Learning Center represents the final major project to be completed under the 2008 bond initiative. The major capacity -driven project to be funded by the 2012 bond is the new middle school (Middle School No. 4) currently in the final planning stage and scheduled to open Fall of 2016. Other capacity related projects to be funded by the 2012 Bond Measure include land acquisition and replacement/relocation/upgrade of portable classrooms. Funding for a new elementary school is as yet unsecured. The District intends to structure its capital improvement program so as to maintain a constant level of construction throughout the program period, in order to optimally utilize its management capabilities. Estimated expenditures for capacity improvement projects over the duration of the Plan are indicated in the Table 4 below. SIX -YEAR FINANCE PLAN Capacity Improvement Projects PROJECT Estimated Expenditures' ($1,000s) Funding ($1,000s) 2015-16 2016-17 2017-18 2018-19 2019-20 2020-21 Total Secured Unsecured Middle School No. 4 15,400 23,200 2,900 41,500 41,500 Relocatable Classrooms 1,200 1,000 800 400 3,400 1,750 1,650 Land Acquisition 2,500 2,500 2,500 2,250 2,250 12,000 5,000 7,000 New Elementary Schools 7,200 5,900 18,900 32,800 22,500 87,300 87,300 Total 19,100 33,900 12,100 21,550 35,050 22,500 1", 200 48,250 95,950 Table 4 1. Estimated expenditures based on total project cost including hard and soft costs. 2. Secured funding includes 2012 bond monies, previously collected school impact fees, and proceeds from sale of surplus properties. 3. Unsecured funds includeCSPI School Construction Assistance, future school impactfees and future bond initiatives. -15- Capital Facilities Plan 2015 - 2021 Renton School District No. 403 mlov Capital Facilities Plan 2015 - 2021 Renton School District No. 403 VIL IMPACT FEES Each jurisdiction that imposes school impact fees requires that developers pay these fees to help cover a share of the impact that new housing developments have on school facilities. To determine an equitable fee throughout unincorporated King County, a formula was established. This formula can be found in King County code 21A and was substantially adopted by the cities of Bellevue, Newcastle and Renton. The formula requires the District to establish a "Student Generation Factor" that estimates how many students will be added to a school district by each new single or multi -family unit constructed, and to establish several standard construction costs which are unique to that district. Refer to Appendix G for substantiating documentation on Student Generation Factors. Site Acquisition Cost is the estimated cost per acre to purchase property. Building Acquisition Cost is the estimated cost to construct facilities unique to the district. New Facility Cost Models are provided in Appendix G. Temporary Facility Cost is the estimated cost per classroom to purchase and install a relocatable classroom. State Funding Assistance Credit is the amount of funding provided by the State, subject to District eligibility, based on a construction cost allocation and funding assistance percentage established by the State. In response to declining economic conditions over the past several years, and the slow recovery, Renton School District has inserted a Voluntary District Adjustment component into the prescribed impact fee formula. The intent of this adjustment is to limit any increase in impact fees to a percentage equal to the local rate of inflation (CPU-U-Sea) as reported by the King County Office of Economic and Financial Analysis. While both single and multi -family impact fees show an increase over last year's fees, the final fees reflect a reduction of $3,503 and $1,704 respectively, as a result of the limiting 1.84% rate of inflation for the year 2013. Based on the Growth Management Act and King County Code 21A, impact fees for the plan year 2015 are: Single -Family Units $ 5,643 Multi -Family Units $ 1,385 Single -Family and Multi -Family Fee Calculation spreadsheets follow. -17- Capital Facilities Plan 2015 — 2021 Renton School District No. 403 SINGLE-FAMILY RESIDENCE FEE CALCULATION SITE ACQUISITION COST FACILITY SITE AREA COST PER ACRE STUDENTS STUDENT FACTOR COST Al Elementary 10 450,000 550 0.361 $2,954 A2 Middle 20 450,000 850 0.133 $1,408 A3 N / A 40 450,000 1250 0.139 $0 A Total 0.633 $4,362 BUILDING ACQUISITION COST COST IN 2015 $ STUDENTS STUDENT FACTOR COST B1 Elementary 95.24% 26,148,500 550 0.361 $16,346 B2 Middle 94.59% 38,234,860 850 0.133 $5,659 B3 N / A 99.42% 0 1250 0.139 $0 B Total 96.75% 0.633 $22,005 TEMPORARY BUILDING ACQUISITION COST COST PER CLASS STUDENTS STUDENT FACTOR COST C1 Elementary 4.76% 165,000 24 0.361 $118 C2 Middle 5.41% 165,000 26 0.133 $46 C3 N / A 0.58% 165,000 26 0.139 $0 C Total 3.25% 0.633 $164 STATE FUNDING ASSISTANCE CREDIT COST INDEX SPI SQ FT MATCH % STUDENT FACTOR CREDIT D1 200.4 90 0.399 0.361 ($2,598) D2 200.4 117 0.399 0.133 ($1,244) D3 200.4 130 0.399 0.139 $0 D Total 0.633 ($3,842) TAX CREDIT (TC) AVERAGE ASSESSED VALUE (AAV) 311,174 INTEREST RATE FOR BONDS (i) 3.68% TERM (t = MAXIMUM 10) 10 TAX RATE (r) 0.00171412 TC Total ($4,396.02) ($4,396) FACILITY CREDIT $0 TOTAL FEE $18,292 50%DEVELOPER FEE OBLIGATION $9,146 IMPACT FEE $9,146 PREVIOUS YEAR'S IMPACT FEE $5,541 VOLUNTARY MAX IMPACT FEE INCREASE (previous year's fee X 0.0184) $102 VOLUNTARY IMPACT FEE ADJUSTMENT $3,503 ADJUSTED IMPACT FEE $5,643 * TAX CREDIT (TC) =NPV (net present value) x AAV x r where: NPV = i (1 + i)t AAV = Average Assessed Value r = Tax Rate i = Bond Interest Rate as of 12/27/12 t = Bond Term 1 ".1 Capital Facilities Plan 2015 — 2021 Renton School District No. 403 MULTI -FAMILY RESIDENCE FEE CALCULATION SITE ACQUISITION COST FACILITY SITE AREA COST PER ACRE STUDENTS STUDENT FACTOR COST Al Elementary 10 450,000 550 0.170 $1,391 A2 Middle 20 450,000 850 0.050 $529 A3 High N/A 40 450,000 1250 0.061 $0 A Total 0.281 $1,920 BUILDING ACQUISITION COST COST IN 2014 $ STUDENTS STUDENT FACTOR COST 61 Elementary 95.24% 18,293,275 550 0.170 $5,385 B2 Middle 94.59% 35,047,880 850 0.050 $1,950 B3 High N/A 99.42% 0 1250 0.061 $0 B Total 96.75% 0.281 $7,335 TEMPORARY BUILDING ACQUISITION COST COST PER CLASS STUDENTS STUDENT FACTOR COST C1 Elementary 4.76% 165,000 24 0.170 $56 C2 Middle 5.41% 165,000 26 0.050 $17 C3 High N/A 0.58% 165,000 26 0.061 $0 C Total 3.25% 0.281 $73 STATE FUNDING ASSISTANCE CREDIT COST INDEX SPI SQ FT MATCH % STUDENT FACTOR CREDIT D1 200.4 90 0.399 0.170 ($1,223) D2 200.4 117 0.399 0.050 ($468) D3 200.4 130 0.399 0.061 $0 D Total 0.281 ($1,691) TAX CREDIT (TC) AVERAGE ASSESSED VALUE (AAS) 103,325 INTEREST RATE FOR BONDS (i) 3.68% TERM (MAXIMUM 10) 10 TAX RATE (r) 0.00171412 TC Total ($1,459.69) ($1,460) FACILITY CREDIT $0 FEE $6,178 50%DEVELOPER FEE OBLIGATION $3,089 IMPACT FEE $3,089 PREVIOUS YEAR'S IMPACT FEE $1,360 VOLUNTARY MAX IMPACT FEE INCREASE (previous year's fee X 0.0184) $25 VOLUNTARY IMPACT FEE ADJUSTMENT $1,704 ADJUSTED IMPACT FEE $1,385 1+it-1 * TAX CREDIT (TC) = NPV (net present value) x AAV x r where: NPV = i(1+i) AAV = Average Assessed Value r = Tax Rate i = Bond Interest Rate as of 12/27/12 t = Bond Term -19- Capital Facilities Plan 2015 — 2021 Renton School District No. 403 -20- Capital Facilities Plan 2015 — 2021 Renton School District No. 403 XIII. APPENDICES APPENDIX A: DISTRICT MAPS ..................................... 23 APPENDIX B: CAPACITY WORKSHEETS...............................27 APPENDIX C: HEADCOUNT & PROJECTIONS ...........................29 APPENDIX D: 2012 BOND MEASURE SUMMARY ........................31 APPENDIX E: 2016 BOND MEASURE PROPOSAL ....................... 33 APPENDIX F: STUDENT GENERATION FACTORS .......................37 APPENDIX G: SCHOOL COST MODELS ................................ 39 -21 - Capital Facilities Plan 2015 — 2021 Renton School District No. 403 -22- Capital Facilities Plan 2015 - 2021 Renton School District No. 403 APPENDIX A RSD BOUNDARY MAP - MUNICIPALITY OVERLAY Unincorporated King County Unincorporated King County -23- Capital Facilities Plan 2015 — 2021 Renton School District No. 403 APPENDIX A -24- Capital Facilities Plan 2015 — 2021 Renton School District No. 403 APPENDIX A N � J ee E _ t] �. m � Z• m is -e � o m � c w t c °i W C] w y E y c c N= ©5 V 61 y N E °'vim rG—of N q] $V!LJ 7^C J LY m y E ai Eqj W W E y E N w O W W -yW WiJ Lj.9T Lu W W v$a �S�J c m W z 1.6 W Z Lw py p W �Q' 4 J ma��© 6a=20..����4W ��1 r�ur Q 9 W r=NJ 0.1 ?e '� N O .— seA .? C G N© C Gl p 0 1�6 2 W `G� id ai $ b 0¢G uGi !� !E p u�i w a N 4 '—� a m C.1 (] r"n mm��xxx �sN�� �o�a omzi 1p =1 .ICO LO El a)=2=w5wbwLu c ===UJ (2o�¢w 2 o $ Eu�m��xxx�J � � -o �xJ�va �,cn�> w ,1 } M I as To 0 h 41 � W S's rJir lkr. S r '{'A,ik•:'l � $ ^i W_ Cr IV - n' d. .•yv W a I J 3S 3AY HJObl._ - CL ■ YC'( )E A1.±'E 14E --i W Lu 4W _ cc CA u� •ice N I. tr`"�r� ;4 v_•� �`.i ti},+i ii 3.-tl C1YlY• ;.�. c • w ti- PARKPX° ..� s:VdNRIMf:H 1N Wt"S - N1N' � I -25- Capital Facilities Plan 2015 — 2021 Renton School District No. 403 APPENDIX A -26- Capital Facilities Plan 2015 — 2021 Renton School District No. 403 APPENDIX B ELEMENTARY SCHOOL CAPACITY ASSUMPTIONS Average class size: Class size: K 24 Kindergarten 24.00 1 24 Grades 1 - 5 26.00 2 24 FTE variation from 10 / 1 0.98 3 24 Scheduling efficiency: 0.92 4 29 5 29 FTE FTE CLASSROOMS GENERAL KINDER SPEC ED SPEC USE CAPACITY PORT USE ADD SPEC CAPACITY W/ PORTS SCHOOL BENSON HILL 18 4 3 3 520 0 0 520 BRYN MAWR 14 4 1 3 424 4 0 520 CAMPBELL HILL 13 4 3 3 400 4 0 496 CASCADE 16 5 3 3 494 7 0 662 HAZELWOOD 18 5 3 3 542 0 0 542 HIGHLANDS 18 5 3 3 542 0 0 542 HONEY DEW 12 5 2 1 398 8 0 590 KENNYDALE 20 4 1 3 568 0 0 568 LAKERIDGE 15 3 3 3 426 6 0 570 MAPLEWOOD HEIGHTS 16 6 1 2 516 6 0 660 RENTON PARK 20 3 3 3 546 0 0 546 SIERRA HEIGHTS 17 6 1 2 540 6 0 684 TALBOT HILL 17 3 1 3 474 3 0 546 TIFFANY PARK 15 3 3 3 426 2 0 474 TOTAL 229 60 31 38 6816 46 0 7,920 MIDDLE SCHOOL CAPACITY ASSUMPTIONS Average class size 29 Class size 6 29 FTE variation from 10 / 1 0.98 7 29 Scheduling efficiency 0.92 8 29 # FTE TEACHING SPEC SPEC FTE PORT SPEC CAPACITY CLASSROOMS STATIONSGENERAL SCI PE )RAMJCOMP CTE ART MUSIC ED USE CAPACITY USE USE W/PORTS SCHOOL DIMMITT 43 26 2 4 1 1 4 1 2 2 0 1066 7 1248 McKNIGHT 47 20 8 4 1 2 2 1 3 6 0 1066 8 1274 NELSEN 47 18 8 3 1 3 2 1 2 9 0 988 8 1196 TOTAL 137 17 0 3120 23 3718 -27- Capital Facilities Plan 2015 — 2021 Renton School District No. 403 APPENDIX B HIGH SCHOOL CAPACITY ASSUMPTIONS Average class size 29 Class size 9 29 FTE variation from 10/1 0.98 10 29 Scheduling efficiency 0.85 11 29 12 29 # FTE TEACHING SPEC SPEC FTE PORT SPEC CAPACITY CLASSROOMS STATIONSGENERAL SCI GYM HE COMPSHOP ART MUSIC ED USE CAPACITY USE USE W/PORTS SCHOOL HAZEN 77 48 6 5 3 6 4 3 2 9 0 1632 0 0 1632 LINDBERGH 59 34 4 4 4 4 3 3 3 5 0 1296 1 0 1320 RENTON 78 44 6 5 6 7 5 3 2 5 0 1752 0 0 1752 SLC 27 20 1 1 1 2 1 1 0 0 5 476 0 0 476 TOTAL 214 19 5 5156 1 5180 SPECIAL EDUCATIONAL FACILITY CAPACITY ASSUMPTIONS Average class size Varies All facilities used for special programs FTE variation from 10/1 0.98 Scheduling efficiency 0.94 FTE FTE CLASSROOMS GENERAL SPEC ED SPEC USE CAPACITY PORT USE ADD SPEC CAPACITY W/ PORTS SCHOOL RENTON ACADEMY 24 0 3 243 0 0 243 MEADOW CREST 21 0 0 464 0 0 464 SARTORI 14 0 3 310 0 0 310 SPRING GLEN 14 0 1 310 4 0 398 TOTAL 73 0 7 1327 4 0 1415 t -28- Capital Facilities Plan 2015- 2021 Renton School District No. 403 APPENDIX C n Til raS 2 4-+ -� .i IN .a g Ld �3 sffi •+ C} It ra I` Ch ,+ i +9y6 .w �R tpd� J ek 15,40.10 Capital Facilities Plan 2015-2021 Renton School District No. 403 APPENDIX C Lo ry 4h m n CA 10 LID CO 97 n CN r-, CD m ay1 -n m Qp 01 irY I, co f, Q+ m 0 fo m E! oc -M LO OP dP f7 co 0 OP Co 4 M N r- rl t- 4;M U7 M m r4 eg en ai m 0 m 0 0 fn 0 cn C3 CD to CD to I C-) (m Q:l V- r- Me W"7 C-) Cq Ap U� wl� -g 7> Os q, C3 L6 11 w m r- r4 reo v LJ c E m 1p a r LU ID J VI u f ; 3i DT LSD M. -30- Capital Facilities Plan 2015- 2021 Renton School District No. 403 APPENDIX D 2012 BOND MEASURE SUMMARY NEW FACILITIES New Middle School 119,000 sf Located at Renton Academy site EXISTING FACILITIES UPGRADES Lindbergh Pool Upgrades SITE RELATED UPGRADES Parking Lot and Sidewalk Upgrades Elementary Field Upgrades SAFETY AND SECURITY Add Emergency Generators Fire Alarm and Smoke Detector Upgrades Security System Upgrades ENERGY CONSERVATION Boiler Upgrades Parking Lot Lighting and Controls Heating Systems Upgrades BUILDING UPGRADES Exterior Upgrades Roofing Replacements Replace Gutters and Downspouts Interior Upgrades Upgrade/Replace Interior Finishes and Materials Electrical — Replace/Upgrade System Components Plumbing — Replace/Upgrade System Components Mechanical — Replace/Upgrade System Components Portables Replace Aging Portables LAND ACQUISITION For Future Planning IMS E Capital Facilities Plan 2015 - 2021 Renton School District No. 403 APPENDIX D MIOM Capital Facilities Plan 2015 - 2021 Renton School District No. 403 APPENDIX E Renton School District No. 403 Proposal For 2016, BOND MEASURE E April 27. 2015 Estimated host SITE RELATED IMPROVEMENTS Parking Lot � $4,2-K629 Hazen -Over ay select asphalt parking of surfa ces $692,656 i Sierra Heights - Overiay select asphalt parking lot surfaces $456,301 L Lindbergh - Overlay asphalt at.southwest parking lot $982,S01 L Nelsen - Select asphalt repairs 5304201 L Tiffany Park - Overlayselectasphaltparkingl€tsurraces %,,46'426 R Renton Higjh - Overlay select asphalt parking lot surfaces $696,151 R La keridge - Overlay select asphalt parking lot surfaces- $182,521 R Talbot Hilil - Overlay select asphalt parking lot sur,lr c '- _ 5266,176 Track and Field Upgrades _ 1 a,961,502 H Hla¢en - Replace synthetic fie a _u`= and refurbish exkti ng sack. surfaces �2,047,501 L Lindbergh - Replace syntheti:.13C,11 d if and r Irbish a sting tract. su rfaces 52,047,501 [AV Renton. Stadium - lie laceeld turfy kl track su�rfares $2 66,501 P s'{� aT4 r8 i - .I,cac ■3a Upararie Kvaderbnard$ i Hazen - Upgrade re�� -i McKnight - Upgradefeaderboar$-, Honey Dew- Ulpim ?airea oieItl.— H Kennydale - I pga ae a readerhoae141 H Maplewood -Upgratfereaderbo, H Sierra Heights - ade, I rd L Nelsen - UP.-ractere addrb�oa L Benson Hil - Upgrade reader W L Cascade - Upgrade readerboard L Renton Park - Upgrade readerboa rd L Tiffany Park - Upgrade readerboard R Renton High - Upgrade readerboard R Bryn Mawr - Upgrade readerboard R Campbell Hill - Upgrade readerboard R Highlands - Upgrade readerboard R La keridige - Upgrade readerboard R Talbot hil I - Upgrade readerboa rd U pgrade Playground L Benson Hill - Replace p`ayground equipment L cascade - Repla€ep>ayground equipment L Tiffany Park - Rep ace playground equipment 1 or 4 Proposal For -33- Capital Facilities Plan 2014— 2020 Renton School District No. 403 APPENDIX E Proposal for 2016 Bond Measure 1i FO.ghlands -Replace p,ayground equipment R Lakeridge -Replace playground equipment R Talbot Full - Repl.are playground equipment ENERGY CONSERVATION Boilerand Heat - Sierra Heights H Sierra Heights L Benson Hill - R L Tiffany Park - 1 R Bryn Mawr- R 9 Bryn Mawr- R 3 Campbell Hdl - La keridge - Rel La keridge - Ref Domestic Water C Hazen - Repla c Unit Ventilator OF - Nelsen - R:epla UOO `:nnexatRent, LED Lighting UN [7w AnnexatRent, Blalding Control -1 Sierra Heights MV Annex. at Rent Bl11LDIN lrF- .pF%►%vr=-a Corridor. Commons and Gymnasium Upgrades 1 McKnight - Upgrade corridor, commons and gym wal, finishes: H Ha¢eMood - Upgrade corridor, commons and gym wall finishes H Kennydale - Upgrade corridor,. commons and gym wall finishes H Maplewood Heights - Upgrade torrid or, commons and gym wa I finishes H Sierra Heights - Upgrade torrid or, commons and gym wal I finishes Su ht _,;al L Nelsen -Replace gymnasium operab a wa II L Nelsen - Provide wainscot at locker room and gym corridor walls L Benson Hill - Upgrade corridor, commons and gym wal I finishes L Cascade- U pgrade €onidor, commons and gym wall finishes L Renton Park - Upgrade corridor, commons and gym wall finishes L Tiffany Park - Upgrade corridor, commons and gym wall finishes 2of4 -34- s'imated t test $380,251 5380,251 $380,251 $14,7' 068 $5,424,785 $491,401 $704,341 $475,021 $815,001 $475,021 $655,201 $475,021 $589,6a1 $737,101 $7lii,8 1 5163 ,a 01 $2,784,61)l S2,125,401 $655,201 $122,851 $122.851 $442,261 5131,041 $9,08G.0 $8,142,464 $387,856 $319,411 $319,411 5273, 5228, $98, $319, 5319 Capital Facilities Plan 2014— 2020 Renton School District No. 403 APPENDIX E Proposal for 2016 Bond Measure R Renton High - Remodel gymnasium locker morns and team rooms R Renton High - Replace gymnasium lower bleachers R Renton High - Upgrade gymnasium corridor ceilings and lighting R Renton High - Provide wainscot at gymnasium east hallway R Dinmit - Replace gymnasium gable wall R Dimmit- Provide wainscot at locker room vestibules R Bryn Mawr - Upgrade €arridor, commons and gym ~wall f nishes R Campbell Hill Upgrade corridor, commons and gym wall finishes R Highlands - Upgrade corridor, commons and gym, wall finishes R Lakeridge - Upgrade corridor, commons and gym wall finishes R Talbot Hill - Upgrade €orridor, commons and gym wall finishes R Talbot Hill - Replace wall pads in gymnasium R Talbot Hill - Replace gymnasium folding wall finish leplam Roofs,, GIltters and H McKnight - Replace low slope roof membranes } H Sierra Heists - Replace roof, gutters and downspouts L Tiffany Park - Replace roof, gutters and downspouts R Renton High - Replace canopy roof connecting gyre #id n,�vc>lbuildi ng R Bryn Mawr- Replace roof, gutters and downspoud. R La-keridge - Replace roof, gutters and downspouts R Talbot Hill - Replace roof, gutters and downspouts % MV Annex at Renton Academy - Replace rs F, gvtter5 and dt wnspouts ti Wroclaw 19torefrord Replaceffieltt'ar r*g " � 4 Renton High - Replace gyrnnasn* glass. for k and unnilov,�s apt- st wing stairwel' wind_ Replace Floor Finishes 1k H McKnight -Replace carpet and sereq flcbr finisfta5 H Maplewood Het F epTa€ -aU €arpwIt excgA co,Oidors H Siisrra Hiziahtcep all earrxpt tntdLprt flei?nichps L Lindbergh - Replada d� €arpetanq select floor finishes L Nelsen - Replace c1as3syjom,"2r fimir tion and lobby carpet a nd select floor finishea L Tiffany Park -Replace wed wrng°rp R Renton High - Provide interior'" crff mats R Renton High - Remove paint from floors at gymnasium building R Renton High - Polish and seal terrazzo floors at gyrnasium building R Dimmit- Replace classroom -carpet and selectfk3or finishes R Bryn Mawr- Replace classroom and administration carpet Upgrade floors R Replace exterior doors at gymnasium building L"Fak AM S~ i tnv District Wide - Upgrade ADA andwayfirrdingsignage Interior Fiilsh 1.4gralms4 MV Annex at Renton Academy- Upgrade select interior finishes and structural upgrade= 3 04 -35- $2,866,501 $357,436 $409,501 $39,547 $30,421 5152,101 $9,557,736 $982,901 51,842,751 51,736,281 $163,901 $.1,392,301 $1,556,101 $1,fi38,0o1 $245,701 36U,961 687,961 $L,5A964 �608,4t11 y311,806 $334,621 51,140,751 $608,401 $152,101 $39,547 $79,093 $98,866 %46,426 $418,276 $'13+$ir C0 387 $39E,4611 $395,461 $6.14,251 %14, 251 Capital Facilities Plan 2014— 2020 Renton School District No. 403 APPENDIX E Proposal for 2016 Bond Measure Upgrade Independailt Learning Centers and Health Areas - Lindbergh - R.emode nea'rh area for special needs students L Nelsen - Pro%ide bathroom for I ndependent Learning Center L cascade - Provide bathroom for Independent Learning Center R Dim mit -Provide bathroom for Independent Learning, center Exterior Finish System Repair and Paint McKnort- Rem select exterior insulation finish systems: R Renton High -Repair se ect exterior insulation finish systems Renton High - Repairsemect plaster finishes at IKEA Perforrning Arts Center Clean and Seal Exterior 141asonry+ and Moistnm Prrot+ctian Lrdbergh. - 14.ate• proof foundation a SE,corner of Gymnasium Courtyard Upgrades L Nelsen- R.enlace upper courtyard €oncrete Electrical Upgrades L Lindbergh - PFUVide additional power outlets in cafeteria/ U00 KEC - I n-stal I TJSS s7otern Mechanical) Plumbing U,pgradea_JW ti Hazen - Provide cooling at computer tabs ti Hazen - Upgrade filtering system in Arts claw area ff Honey Dew- Provide €oolingthroua6id building L Ttffany Park-- Add heat to €orrt ectin M49 buildinpouth wing R Talbot Hill -Replace exterior meta FUTURE PLAWNH46-:-7 Land Acquisition � - acquire property cd;ecent to Evergreen R.iaral site and other future locations New Elementary Stool - No. l� � - Design and Construction o7 Elementary Schoo WAS ('e Sartori) NeY': Elementary School - No. 16 - Design and Construction of Elementary School No.16 (�@ Evergreen) Portable Classrooms use EfOJ District .9de - Relocate existing portable classrooms (5 double classroom portables) Erg`+ District'Aide - New portable cassrooms (5 double classroom portables) UOJ District Aride -Replace se ect roofs, gutters and downspouts 404 -36- Subtotal: subtotal: Estimated Cost $466.8a3 $212r4341 S81rg1 S65,S21 S106r471 S2.H-._, e1-12 S121,681 $6f},841 5106,471 Sl °31 G.4'Ji S31iG,251 S380._51 $250,966 538,026 S212; 941 $2„412,988 5212,941 5122,851 51,638,001 $16,381 522,916 $2B4O6%6,51 $8,000,000 58;+900; QOQ $41,213,6,51 $41, 213,651 $43,853,907 5543,853,907 $4,930,382 s1,883,701 S2r6fi1,751 5384,9331 $97°997,9�W0 Total Project Costs:1 $150.142,999 Capital Facilities Plan 2015 - 2021 Renton School District No. 403 APPENDIX F STUDENT GENERATION FACTORS The formula for determining school impact fees, as established by King County Council Ordinance 11621, Attachment A, requires that school districts provide "student factors based on district records of average actual student generation rates for new developments constructed over a period of not more than five years prior to the date of the fee calculation." The Ordinance also provides that, in the event this information is not available in the District, "data from adjacent districts, districts with similar demographics, or county -wide averages must be used." King County currently assesses and collects impact fees on behalf of twelve school districts, including Renton School District. Of those twelve districts, only five conduct their own surveys to develop their unique student generation factors based on district records and actual development data. The remaining seven districts, including Renton, rely on averages of student factors developed by other districts. In accordance with King County Ordinance 11621, Attachment A, the District has chosen to use a county -wide average based on all districts that have performed their own student generation factor surveys as well as those that have similarly relied on county -wide data. The Student Generation Factors in Table 5 below represent an average of the student rates calculated by the other eleven school districts. STUDENT GENERATION FACTORS ELEMENTAR MIDDLE SCHO HIGH SCH00 TOTAL (K-5) (6-8) (9-12) SINGLE-FAMI Y 0.361 0.133 0.139 0.633 MULTI-FAMILI 0.170 0.050 0.061 0.281 Table 5 Table 6 on the following page details the student generation factors developed by the Districts referenced above, and the averages used in this Plan's impact fee calculations. -37- Capital Facilities Plan 2015 - 2021 Renton School District No. 403 APPENDIX F COUNTY -WIDE STUDENT GENERATION FACTORS DISTRICT SI NGLE-FAMI LY MULTI -FAMILY K-5 6-8 9-12 TOTAL K-5 6-8 9-12 TOTAL Auburn 0.165 0.076 0.089 0.330 0.223 0.091 0.092 0.406 Enumclaw 0.378 0.127 0.146 0.651 0.192 0.057 0.068 0.317 Federal Way 0.332 0.166 0.210 0.707 0.148 0.042 0.059 0.249 Fife 0.235 0.157 0.000 0.392 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 Highline 0.378 0.127 0.146 0.651 0.192 0.057 0.068 0.317 Issaquah 0.471 0.170 0.145 0.786 0.165 0.052 0.051 0.268 Kent 0.484 0.129 0.249 0.862 0.324 0.066 0.118 0.508 Lake Washington 0.393 0.131 0.103 0.627 0.055 0.017 0.012 0.084 Tahoma 0.378 0.127 0.146 0.651 0.192 0.057 0.068 0.317 Riverview 0.378 0.127 0.146 0.651 0.192 0.057 0.068 0.317 Snoqualmie Valley 0.378 0.127 0.146 0.651 0.192 0.057 0.068 0.317 TOTAL 3.970 1.464 1.526 6.959 1.875 1 0.553 1 0.672 3.100 AVERAGE 1 0.361 0.133 0.139 0.633 0.170 1 0.050 1 0.061 0.282 Table 6 W1.02 Capital Facilities Plan 2015 - 2021 Renton School District No. 403 APPENDIX G FACILITY COST MODELS Facility cost models are a calculation of the cost to construct educational facilities unique to the District. This is accomplished by utilizing both District specific data as well as information available from OSPI. OSPI constants are factors established by OSPI as part of its School Construction Assistance Program. State Funding Assistance Percentages are unique to individual school districts while the Construction Cost Allocation (per square foot of construction) is constant throughout the state. The State Area Allocation (per student) is used solely by OSPI to determine a District's eligibility for state funding. It is not meant to represent or reflect the unique spatial needs of a District necessary to provide its adopted programs and standard of service. The District Area Allocation utilized in the cost models reflects historical data from previously constructed facilities, or facilities currently under construction, adjusted to reflect current programs, anticipated funding and other topical issues. The applied Cost per Square Foot is an average of recently bid school projects of similar grade levels in the Puget Sound Region, as reported by OSPI. Elementary and Middle School Cost Models follow. -39- Capital Facilities Plan 2015 - 2021 Renton School District No. 403 APPENDIX G ELEMENTARY SCHOOL COST MODEL FACILITY INFORMATION Building Site Work Student capacity 550 Area (acres) 7 SF per student 126 Cost per acre $425,000 Generic classrooms 27 Right-of-way LF 2,200 Gym and cafeteria Separate Right-of-way cost per LF $350 Building area (SF) 69,500 Utility improvements $350,000 Cost per SF $308 Demolition Site Preparation Area (SF) 43,750 Area (acres) 7 Cost per SF $10 Cost per acre $30,000 CONSTRUCTION COST Demolition $437,500 Site prep $210,000 Building $21,406,000 Site work $2,975,000 Right-of-way improvements $770,000 Off -site utility improvements $350,000 Subtotal $26,148,500 Cost per SF $376 SOFT COSTS Professional fees 12% $3,137,820 Sales tax 10% $2,614,850 Change Order Contingency 7% $1,830,395 Permits 1% $261,485 Special inspections 1% $261,485 Art 1% $261,485 Work by separate contract 1% $261,485 Temporary Facilities 1% $261,485 Moving and Storage 1% $261,485 Furniture, fixtures & equipr 6% $1,568,910 Project management 3% $784,455 District administration 1% $261,485 Mitigation 3% $784,455 Project contingency 7% $1,830,395 Subtotal $14,381,675 CONSTRUCTION COSTS + SOFT COSTS $40,530,175 ESCALATION Year Inflation Rate Amount 2015 0.93% $40,907,106 Bond 2016 2.32% $41,856,150 Bid 2017 2.62% $42,952,782 PROJECT COSTS Midpoint 2018 2.73% $44,125,393 2019 2.66% $45,299,128 2020 2.90% $46,612,803 Note: Amounts do not include property acquisitio00 Capital Facilities Plan 2015 - 2021 Renton School District No. 403 APPENDIX G MIDDLE SCHOOL COST MODEL FACILITY INFORMATION Building Site Work Student capacity 850 Area (acres) 11 SF per student 140 Cost per acre $400,000 Generic classrooms 31 Right-of-way LF 1,000 Building area (SF) 119,000 Right-of-way cost per LF $350 Cost per SF $270 Utility improvements $231,000 Demolition/Abatement Site Preparation Area (SF) 52,924 Area (acres) 11 Cost per SF $15 Cost per acre $30,000 CONSTRUCTION COST Demolition $793,860 Site prep $330,000 Building $32,130,000 Site work $4,400,000 Right-of-way improvements $350,000 Off -site utility improvements $231,000 S u btota 1 $38, 234, 860 Cost per SF $321 SOFT COSTS Professional fees 12% $4,588,183 Sales tax 10% $3,632,312 Change Order Contingency 7% $1,830,395 Permits 1% $261,485 Special inspections 1% $130,743 Art 1% $130,743 Work by separate contract 1% $261,485 Temporary Facilities 1% $130,743 Moving and Storage 1% $130,743 Furniture, fixtures & equipr 6% $1,568,910 Project management 2% $522,970 District administration 1% $130,743 Mitigation 2% $522,970 Project contingency 7% $2,676,440 S u btota 1 $16, 518, 863 CONSTRUCTION COSTS + SOFT COSTS (BID 02/26/2015) $54,753,7231 ESCALATION Year Inflation Rate Amount 2015 0.93% 2016 2.32% 2017 2.62% 2018 2.73% 2019 2.66% 2020 2.90% Note: Amounts do not include property acquisition -41- Capital Facilities Plan 2015 - 2021 Renton School District No. 403 APPENDIX G -42- Capital Facilities Plan 2015 - 2021 Renton School District No. 403 APPENDIX H CHANGES FROM PREVIOUS PLAN PERMANENT FACILITY CAPACITY 2014-2020 2015-2021 CHANGE Elementary 7,251 6816 -435 Middle 3,138 3120 -18 High 4,710 5156 446 Total 15,099 15,092 -7 ACTUAL STUDENT ENROLLMENT (October headcount) 2014 2015 CHANGE Elementary 7,226 7469 243 Middle 3,169 3210 41 High 3,932 4239 307 Total 14,327 14918 591 IMPACT FEES 2014-2020 2015-2021 CHANGE SINGLE-FAMILY FEE 5,541 5,643 102 Student Generation Factors Elementary 0.380 0.361 -0.019 Middle 0.144 0.133 0.011 High 0.149 0.139 -0.010 Tota 1 0.673 0.633 -0.040 MULTI -FAMILY FEE 1,360 1,385 25 Student Generation Factors Elementary 0.139 0.170 0.031 Middle 0.039 0.050 0.011 High 0.055 0.061 0.006 Total 0.233 0.281 0.048 IMPACT FEE FACTORS Cost per Acre 450,000 400,000 -50,000 Temp. Bldg. Acquisition 165,000 165,000 0 State Match Percentage 0.3930 0.3990 0.0060 Ave. Assessed Value - Single 219,000 311,174 92,174 Ave. Assessed Value - Multi 93,092 103,325 10,233 Bond Interest Rate 4.46% 3.68% -0.78% Tax Rate 2.30546/1000 1.71412/1000 -0.59134/1000 MASM Capital Facilities Plan 2015 - 2021 Renton School District No. 403 APPENDIX G