Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutCouncil 06/07/2010AGENDA  RENTON CITY COUNCIL    REGULAR MEETING  June 7, 2010  Monday, 7 p.m.  1.CALL TO ORDER AND PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE 2.ROLL CALL 3.PROCLAMATION a. Roger I. Lewis Courtroom  4.SPECIAL PRESENTATION a. Demoliton  of  Benson  Road  Bridge  &  I‐405  Closure ‐  Washington  State  Department  of  Transportation & Corridor Design Builders  5.PUBLIC HEARING a. Continuation of a moratorium on the permitting of adult entertainment businesses based on  localization  critieria,  and  assess  whether  change  or  measured  action  is  necessary  to  the  existing ordinance.  6.ADMINISTRATIVE REPORT 7.AUDIENCE COMMENT (Speakers must sign up prior to the Council meeting.  Each speaker is allowed five minutes.  The  comment period will be limited to one‐half hour.  The second audience comment period later on in  the agenda is unlimited in duration.)  When you are recognized by the Presiding Officer, please  walk to the podium and state your name and city of residence for the record, SPELLING YOUR LAST  NAME. 8.CONSENT AGENDA The following items are distributed to Councilmembers in advance for study and review, and the  recommended actions will be accepted in a single motion.  Any item may be removed for further  discussion if requested by a Councilmember.  a. Approval of Council meeting minutes of 5/24/2010. Council concur.  b. Community  and  Economic  Development  Department  submits  60%  Petition  to  Annex  for  the  proposed  Kendall  Annexation  and  recommends  a  public  hearing  be  set  on  6/21/2010  to  consider the petition; 27.66 acres located south of NE 4th St., east of 152nd Ave SE. Council  concur.  c. Community  and  Economic  Development  Department  submits  60%  Petition  to  Annex  for  the  proposed  Sierra  Heights  Elementary  School  and  Maplewood  Heights  Elementary  School  Annexations and recommends a public hearing be set on 6/21/2010 to consider zoning for the  Sierra  Heights  Elementary  School  Annexation. (Maplewood  Heights  Elementary  School  Annexation was prezoned as part of the East Renton Plateau Prezone with R‐4 zoning.) Council  concur.  Page 1 of 118 d. Community Services Department recommends approval of a two‐year lease agreement in the  amount of $7,200 per year with the Renton Community Foundation for Suite 100 at the Liberty  Park Community Building.  Refer to Finance Committee.  e. City  Clerk  reports  bid  opening  on  5/20/2010  for  CAG‐10‐054,  Westhill  Reservoir  Recoat  &  Upgrade  2010  project;  nine  bids;  engineer’s  estimate  $465,922.50;  and  submits  staff  recommendation  to  award  the  contract  to  the  low  bidder,  Coatings  Unlimited,  Inc.,  in  the  amount of $385,303.13.  Refer to Utilities Committee for discussion of funding.  f. Finance  and  Information  Services  Department  requests  authorization  to  convert  a  two‐year  limited term Geographical Information Services (GIS) Coordinator position to a regular full‐time  position.  Refer to Finance Committee.  g. Finance  and  Information  Services  Department  recommends  approval  of  an  interlocal  cooperative  purchasing  agreement  in  the  amount  of  $5,000  per  year  with  the  Washington  State Department of General Administration.   Refer to Finance Committee.  h. Fire and Emergency Services Department recommends approval an interlocal agreement with  Valley  Medical  Center  Occupational  Health  Services  for  employee  medical  services  and  laboratory testing for 2010 through 2012. Council concur. (See 10.a. for resolution.)  i. Police  Department  recommends  approval  of  the  Preventing  Auto  Theft  through  Regional  Operational  Links  (P.A.T.R.O.L.)  interlocal  agreement. Council  concur. (See  10.b.  for  resolution.)  9.UNFINISHED BUSINESS Topics listed below were discussed in Council committees during the past week.  Those topics  marked with an asterisk (*) may include legislation.  Committee reports on any topics may be held  by the Chair if further review is necessary. a. Committee of the Whole: Special Events Ordinance*  b. Finance Committee: Vouchers; Addendum #1 to Landscape Maintenance Contract with Vinson  Brothers; Interlocal Agreement with Fire Protection District #37*  c. Utilities  Committee: Hydrant  Meter  Fees  Ordinance*;  Automated  Meter  Reading  System;  President Park Sanitary Sewer Replacement/Rehabilitation Project; Wonderland Estates Solid  Waste Service  10.RESOLUTIONS AND ORDINANCES Resolutions: a. Valley Medical Center Occupational Health Services interlocal agreement (See 8.h.)  b. Preventing  Auto  Theft  through  Regional  Operational  Links  (P.A.T.R.O.L.)  interlocal  agreement (See 8.i.)  c. Fire Protection District #37 interlocal agreement (See 9.b.)  Page 2 of 118 .  Ordinances for first reading: a. Special events permits (See 9.a.)  b. Hydrant meter fees (See 9.c.)  11.NEW BUSINESS (Includes Council Committee agenda topics; call 425‐430‐6512 for recorded information.) 12.AUDIENCE COMMENT 13.ADJOURNMENT COMMITTEE OF THE WHOLE AGENDA   (Preceding Council Meeting)     7TH FLOOR COUNCIL CONFERENCE ROOM  June 7, 2010  Monday, 5:45 p.m.     Emerging Issues in CED;  Special Events Ordinance    • Hearing assistance devices for use in the Council Chambers are available upon request to the City Clerk •     CITY COUNCIL MEETINGS ARE TELEVISED LIVE ON GOVERNMENT ACCESS CHANNEL 21 AND ARE RECABLECAST:  Tues. & Thurs. at 11 AM & 9 PM, Wed. & Fri at 9 AM & 7 PM and Sat. & Sun. at 1 PM & 9 PM  Page 3 of 118 3a. ‐ Roger I. Lewis Courtroom Page 4 of 118 ! "#$%& #'()*$+, -../ ! " # $%$ & ' & 0 1 ! -0 1 # ( ) $%$ * + , , - . / / 5a. ‐ Continuation of a moratorium on the permitting of adult  entertainment businesses based on localization critieria, and assess Page 5 of 118 CITY OF RENTON COUNCIL AGENDA BILL Subject/Title: Kendall Annexation - Acceptance of 60% Direct Petition Meeting: Regular Council - 07 Jun 2010 Exhibits: Issue Paper 60% Direct Petition King County Certification Document Submitting Data: Dept/Div/Board: Community and Economic Development Staff Contact: Angie Mathias, x6576 Recommended Action: Council concur to set public hearing. Fiscal Impact: Expenditure Required: $ 0 Transfer Amendment: $0 Amount Budgeted: $ 0 Revenue Generated: $0 Total Project Budget: $ 0 City Share Total Project: $ 0 SUMMARY OF ACTION: The Council received a 60% Direct Petition to Annex on January 26, 2010, to annex approximately 28-acres of unincorporated King County located within Renton’s Potential Annexation Area. The proponent’s petition has been certified by King County as having signatures representing at least 60% of the area’s assessed valuation. Under State law, the Council is required to hold a public hearing to consider the annexation petition and the zoning in order to provide interested parties the opportunity to speak. Following the public hearing, Council may approve the annexation of all or any portion of the area proposed for annexation. The site is currently designated Residential Low Density (RLD) on the City’s Comprehensive Plan Land Use Map. The area was prezoned R-4 (allowing four dwelling units per net acre) as part of the East Renton Plateau prezone (Ordinance #5254). The Administration is also seeking authorization to forward the Notice of Intent Package to the Boundary Review Board if Council decided to accept the 60% Direct Petition. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Council set June 21, 2010, for a public hearing to consider the 60% Direct Petition and proposed zoning for the Kendall Annexation and to authorize the Administration to forward the Notice of Intent package to the Boundary Review Board for King County. 8b. ‐ Community and Economic Development Department submits 60%  Petition to Annex for the proposed Kendall Annexation and recommends Page 6 of 118 DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY & ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT M E M O R A N D U M DATE:June 7, 2010 TO:Don Persson, Council President Members of the Renton City Council VIA:Denis Law, Mayor FROM:Alex Pietsch, Administrator x6592 STAFF CONTACT:Angie Mathias, Associate Planner x6576 SUBJECT:Kendall Annexation - Acceptance of 60% Direct Petition to Annex ISSUES: Should the City Council accept the 60% Direct Petition to Annex from the Kendall Annexation Area now that the petition has been certified by the King County Department of Assessments? If the City Council accepts the 60% Direct Petition, should the Administration be directed to forward the Notice of Intent package for this annexation to the Boundary Review Board? RECOMMENDATION: ·Council accept the 60% Direct Petition to Annex the 28-acre Kendall Annexation site; ·Council authorize the Administration to forward the Notice of Intent for the Kendall Annexation to the Boundary Review Board for King County for their review. BACKGROUND SUMMARY: At its September 14, 2009 public meeting, Council accepted the 10% Notice of Intent to Commence Annexation petition and authorized the circulation of a 60% Direct Petition to Annex. City of Renton departments reviewed the annexation proposal and all staff reported that the annexation represents a logical extension of their respective services and systems. There were no issues identified that would impede the annexation. A more detailed discussion of this proposed annexation and review comments are contained in the Department’s September 8, 2009, Kendall Annexation 10% Notice of Intent issue paper. Zoning The Comprehensive Plan Land Use Map designation for the annexation area is Residential Low Density (RLD). The area was prezoned Residential Four Dwelling Units per net Acre (R-4) as part of the East Renton Prezone (Ordinance #5254). The R-4 zoning will become effective at the time of annexation. 8b. ‐ Community and Economic Development Department submits 60%  Petition to Annex for the proposed Kendall Annexation and recommends Page 7 of 118 Don Persson, Council President Page 2 of 2 June 7, 2010 Page 2 of 2 Full-Time Employee (FTE) Need The table below summarizes by department an estimate of the theoretical full-timeemployees the Kendall Annexation may create (a more detailed listing of FTE’s bysection is attached). Each number indicates a fractional number of one full timeemployee. The cumulative column represents the need created by all 60% DirectPetitions to Annex and Unincorporated Island annexations occurring after November2008. To date, those annexations have included Mackay, Shamrock, Duvall South, andEarlington. FTE DEMAND Department Kendall Prior Annexations Cumulative Administrative, Judicial, & City Attorney .01 .22 .23 Community & Economic Development .02 .42 .44 Finance & Information Services .01 .20 .21 Human Resources .00 .04 .04 Police .02 1.04 1.06 Fire & Emergency Management*.00 .56 .56 Community Services .01 .59 .60 Public Works .08 .75 .83 * This annexation, as well as, the Mackay and Shamrock annexations include Administrative fire staff only because emergency response is provided by Fire Districts 25 and 40 through contract. CONCLUSION: The proposed Kendall Annexation has been certified as having sufficient signatures representing at least 60% of the area’s assessed value. It also has reasonable boundaries and appears to comply with Boundary Review Board objectives. Reviewing staff raised no objections to this annexation. The proposed Kendall Annexation furthers the City’s Business Plan goals and is in the general welfare and interest of the City. The Administration recommends the Council accept the 60% Direct Petition and authorize staff to forward the Notice of Intent package to the Boundary Review Board for King County. 8b. ‐ Community and Economic Development Department submits 60%  Petition to Annex for the proposed Kendall Annexation and recommends Page 8 of 118 Kendall Annexation FTE's Based on Berk & Associates Analysis for the West Hill Value Driver Kendall FTE Previous FTE*Cummulative FTE Mayors Office 16 Population n/a n/a n/a City Clerk 16 Population 0.001 0.040 0.041 Hearing Examiner 16 Population 0.001 0.020 0.021 Court Services 16 Population 0.003 0.120 0.123 City Attorney 16 Population 0.002 0.040 0.042 Total 0.007 0.220 0.227 Econ Dev 0 Commercial SF 0.000 0.070 0.070 Neighborhoods 16 Population 0.000 0.020 0.020 Dev. Services & Planning 4,696,600 Acreage of Area 0.018 0.330 0.348 Total 0.018 0.420 0.438 Finance 16 Population 0.002 0.100 0.102 IS 16 Population 0.002 0.100 0.102 Total 0.005 0.200 0.205 Admin and Civil Svs 16 Population 0.001 0.040 0.041 Total 0.001 0.040 0.041 16 Population 0.024 1.040 1.064 Total 0.024 1.040 1.064 Emergency Response 16 Population 0.025 0.560 0.585 Total 0.025 0.560 0.585 Parks 0 Park Acreage in Area 0.000 0.000 0.000 Recreation Services 16 Population 0.006 0.280 0.286 Human Services 16 Population 0.001 0.040 0.041 Library 16 Population 0.006 0.270 0.276 Total 0.013 0.590 0.603 Technical Services 28 Acreage of Area 0.014 0.130 0.144 Maintenance Services Streets/Bridges/Sidewalks 0.60 Miles of Road in Area 0.018 0.170 0.188 Surface Water 28 Acreage of Area 0.014 0.130 0.144 Solid Waste Litter 16 Population n/a n/a n/a Transportation Systems Transportation Planning 28 Acreage of Area 0.014 0.130 0.144 Traffic Operations 0.60 Miles of Road in Area 0.008 0.070 0.078 Traffic Maintenance 0.60 Miles of Road in Area 0.012 0.120 0.132 Transportation Design and Const 28 Acreage of Area n/a n/a n/a Total 0.081 0.750 0.831 * Previous annexations accounted for in this estimate are: Mackay, Shamrock, Duvall South, & Earlington AJS & City Attorney Comm & Econ Dev Finance & IS Community Services PBPW HR Police Fire 8b. ‐ Community and Economic Development Department submits 60%  Petition to Annex for the proposed Kendall Annexation and recommends Page 9 of 118 SE 128th St 1 6 0 t h A v e S E NE 4th St 1 5 6 t h A v e S E 1 5 8 t h A v e S ENE 2nd St SE 132nd St 1 6 2 n d A v e S E P a s c o D r N E N E 3rd St SE 133rd St 1 5 5 t h A v e S E 1 4 8 t h A v e S E SE 131st St SE 130th St SE 132nd Pl S h a d o w A v e N E NE 3rd Ct NE 4th Pl NE 5th St NE 3rd Pl SE 1 2 7th P l NE 3rd Ln Q u i n c e y A v e N E L y o n s P l N E 166th A v e N E 156th A v e S E NE 4th Pl Kendall AnnexationVicinity Map File Name: :\CED\Planning\GIS\GIS_projects\annexations\kendall_annex\mxds\1_kendall_annex_vicinity.mxd Kendall Annexation BoundaryCity LimitsParcelsProduced by City of Renton (c) 2009, the City of Renton all rights reserved. No warranties of any sort, including but not limited to accuracy, fitness or merchantability, accompany this product. Department of Community& Economic Development Alex Pietsch, AdministratorAdriana Johnson, Planning Technician August 17, 2009 1:6,000 0 0.20.1 Miles K e n tKent T u k w i l aTukwila B e l l e v u eBellevue N e w c a s t l eNewcastleSeattleSeattle M e r c e r I s l a n dMercer I s l a n d 8 b .   ‐   C o m m u n i t y   a n d   E c o n o m i c   D e v e l o p m e n t   D e p a r t m e n t   s u b m i t s   6 0 %   P e t i t i o n   t o   A n n e x   f o r   t h e   p r o p o s e d   K e n d a l l   A n n e x a t i o n   a n d   r e c o m m e n d s   P a g e 1 0 o f 1 1 8 8b. ‐ Community and Economic Development Department submits 60%  Petition to Annex for the proposed Kendall Annexation and recommends Page 11 of 118 8b. ‐ Community and Economic Development Department submits 60%  Petition to Annex for the proposed Kendall Annexation and recommends Page 12 of 118 8b. ‐ Community and Economic Development Department submits 60%  Petition to Annex for the proposed Kendall Annexation and recommends Page 13 of 118 8b. ‐ Community and Economic Development Department submits 60%  Petition to Annex for the proposed Kendall Annexation and recommends Page 14 of 118 8b. ‐ Community and Economic Development Department submits 60%  Petition to Annex for the proposed Kendall Annexation and recommends Page 15 of 118 8b. ‐ Community and Economic Development Department submits 60%  Petition to Annex for the proposed Kendall Annexation and recommends Page 16 of 118 8b. ‐ Community and Economic Development Department submits 60%  Petition to Annex for the proposed Kendall Annexation and recommends Page 17 of 118 8b. ‐ Community and Economic Development Department submits 60%  Petition to Annex for the proposed Kendall Annexation and recommends Page 18 of 118 CITY OF RENTON COUNCIL AGENDA BILL Subject/Title: Sierra Heights and Maplewood Heights Elementary Schools Annexations Meeting: Regular Council - 07 Jun 2010 Exhibits: King County Boundary Review Board Closing Letters Maps Draft Ordinances Submitting Data: Dept/Div/Board: Community and Economic Development Staff Contact: Angie Mathias, x6576 Recommended Action: Council concur to set public hearing Fiscal Impact: Expenditure Required: $ 0 Transfer Amendment: $0 Amount Budgeted: $ 0 Revenue Generated: $0 Total Project Budget: $ 0 City Share Total Project: $ 0 SUMMARY OF ACTION: On November 9, 2009, City Council held a public hearing in the matter of the proposed annexation of two elementary schools: Sierra Heights and Maplewood Heights. Following that public hearing, Council accepted the 60% petitions and authorized the Administration to forward Notices of Intent to the King County Boundary Review Board (BRB) for both annexations. On March 23, 2010, the BRB issued Closing Letters for Completed Action indicating its approval of the annexations. The Council must now hold a second public hearing in the matter of zoning Sierra Heights Elementary School. (Maplewood Heights Elementary school was prezoned as part of the East Renton Plateau Prezone with R-4 zoning.) Following the public hearing, the Council may adopt the ordinance establishing zoning for Sierra Heights Elementary. The ordinances annexing both Sierra Heights Elementary and Maplewood Heights Elementary may be adopted without any additional public hearings. City departments conducted a review of the annexation proposals and all departments indicated that the annexations represent logical extensions of services and raised no concerns. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Council set June 21, 2010, for the second public hearing in the matter of zoning the Sierra Heights Elementary School annexation area. Also, adopt the ordinance establishing zoning for Sierra Heights Elementary School, and the ordinances annexing Sierra Heights Elementary and Maplewood Heights Elementary schools. 8c. ‐ Community and Economic Development Department submits 60%  Petition to Annex for the proposed Sierra Heights Elementary School and Page 19 of 118 8c. ‐ Community and Economic Development Department submits 60%  Petition to Annex for the proposed Sierra Heights Elementary School and Page 20 of 118 8c. ‐ Community and Economic Development Department submits 60%  Petition to Annex for the proposed Sierra Heights Elementary School and Page 21 of 118 8c. ‐ Community and Economic Development Department submits 60%  Petition to Annex for the proposed Sierra Heights Elementary School and Page 22 of 118 8c. ‐ Community and Economic Development Department submits 60%  Petition to Annex for the proposed Sierra Heights Elementary School and Page 23 of 118 1 4 4 t h A v e S E SE 132nd St SE 136th St 1 4 6 t h A v e S E 1 4 2 n d A v e S E SE 2nd Ct 1 4 3 r d A v e S E SE 138th St 1 4 8 t h A v e S E 1 4 6 t h P l S E L y o n s A v e N E Maplewood Heights Elementary AnnexationVicinity Map File Name: :\CED\Planning\GIS\GIS_projects\annexations\school_annex\maplewood_heights_elem_annex\mxds\1_maplewood_heights_elem_annex_vicinity_B&W.mxd Maplewood Heights Elementary AnnexCity Limits Produced by City of Renton (c) 2009, the City of Renton all rightsreserved. No warranties of any sort, including but not limited toaccuracy, fitness or merchantability, accompany this product. Depar tment of Community& Economic Development Alex Pietsch, AdministratorAdriana Johnson, Planning Technician July 9, 2009 1:3,200 0 400200Feet 8c. ‐ Community and Economic Development Department submits 60%  Petition to Annex for the proposed Sierra Heights Elementary School and Page 24 of 118 S E 9 5 t h W a y NE 21st St 1 2 6 t h A v e S E SE 100th St 1 3 2 n d A v e S E SE 102nd St NE 22nd St NE 24th St U n i o n A v e N E NE 25th Pl 1 2 8 t h A v e S E V a s h o n A v e N E NE 20th St SE 101st St SE 98 t h S t 1 2 6 t h P l S E 125th A v e S E SE 95th P l NE 2 7 t h Pl125th P l S E U n i o n C t N E 2 3 r d C t S E 9 9 t h S t NE 20th Ct SE 101st St Sierra Heights Elementary AnnexationVicinity Map File Name: :\CED\Planning\GIS\GIS_projects\annexations\school_annex\sierra_heights_elem_annex\mxds\1_sierra_heights_elem_annex_vicinity_B&W.mxd Sierra Heights Elementary AnnexCity Limits Produced by City of Renton (c) 2009, the City of Renton all rightsreserved. No warranties of any sort, including but not limited toaccuracy, fitness or merchantability, accompany this product. Depar tment of Community& Economic Development Alex Pietsch, AdministratorAdriana Johnson, Planning Technician July 8, 200 9 1:5000 0 500250Fee t 8c. ‐ Community and Economic Development Department submits 60%  Petition to Annex for the proposed Sierra Heights Elementary School and Page 25 of 118 1 CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON ORDINANCE NO. ________ AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON ANNEXING CERTAIN TERRITORY OF THE CITY OF RENTON (SIERRA HEIGHTS ELEMENTARY SCHOOL ANNEXATION; FILE NO. A-09-005) WHEREAS, under the provisions of RCW 35A.14.120, as amended, a petition in writing requesting that certain territory contiguous to the City of Renton, as described below, be annexed to the City of Renton, was presented and filed with the City Clerk on or about September 14, 2009. WHEREAS, prior to the filing and circulation of said petition for annexation to the City of Renton, the petitioning owners notified the City Council of their intention to commence such proceedings as provided by law, as more particularly specified in RCW 35A.14.120 and upon public hearing thereon, it having been determined and the petitioning owners having agreed to accept that portion of the City's Comprehensive Plan as it pertains to the territory including the applicable Zoning Code relating thereto; and WHEREAS, the King County Department of Assessments has examined and verified the signatures on the petition for annexation on, or about, September 29, 2009 and determined that the signatures represent at least sixty percent (60%) of the assessed value (excluding streets) of the area to be annexed, as provided by law; and WHEREAS, the Department of Community and Economic Development the City of Renton having considered and recommended the annexing of said property to the City of Renton; and 8c. ‐ Community and Economic Development Department submits 60%  Petition to Annex for the proposed Sierra Heights Elementary School and Page 26 of 118 ORDINANCE NO. _______ 2 WHEREAS, the City Council fixed November 9, 2009, as the time and place for public hearing in the City Council Chambers, City Hall, Renton, Washington, upon the petition and notice thereof having been given as provided by law; and WHEREAS, pursuant to said notices public hearings have been held at the time and place specified in the notices, and the Council having considered all matters in connection with the petition and further determined that all legal requirements and procedures of the law applicable to the petition method for annexation have been met; and WHEREAS, the King County Boundary Review Board having deemed the "Notice of Intention" approved as of March 22, 2010; and WHEREAS, the City of Renton is concurrently zoning the annexation site R-4, four units per net acre; NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON, DOES ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS: SECTION I.The findings, recitals, and determinations are hereby found to be true and correct in all respects. All requirements of the law in regard to the annexation by petition method, including the provisions of RCW 35A.14.120, 130, 140, and 150 have been met. It is further determined that the petition for annexation to the City of Renton of the property and territory described below is hereby approved and granted; the following described property being contiguous to the City limits of the City of Renton is hereby annexed to the City of Renton, and such annexation to be effective on and after the approval, passage, and thirty days after publication of this Ordinance; and on and after said date the property shall 8c. ‐ Community and Economic Development Department submits 60%  Petition to Annex for the proposed Sierra Heights Elementary School and Page 27 of 118 ORDINANCE NO. _______ 3 constitute a part of the City of Renton and shall be subject to all its laws and ordinances then and thereafter in force and effect; the property being described as follows: See Exhibits “A” attached hereto and made a part hereof as if fully set forth herein [Said property, approximately 15-acres, is bordered by the existing City limits to the north, east, and south, with 132nd Avenue Southeast at the east; Parcel lines comprise the western boundary.] and the owners of the property within the annexation shall be subject to the City's Comprehensive Plan and Zoning Code. SECTION II.This Ordinance shall be effective upon its passage, approval, and thirty days after its publication. A certified copy of this Ordinance shall be filed with the King County Council, State of Washington, and as otherwise provided by law. PASSED BY THE CITY COUNCIL this _______ day of ___________________, 2010. Bonnie I. Walton, City Clerk APPROVED BY THE MAYOR this _______ day of _______________________, 2010. Denis Law, Mayor 8c. ‐ Community and Economic Development Department submits 60%  Petition to Annex for the proposed Sierra Heights Elementary School and Page 28 of 118 ORDINANCE NO. _______ 4 Approved as to form: Lawrence J. Warren, City Attorney Date of Publication: ORD.+:+:ma. 8c. ‐ Community and Economic Development Department submits 60%  Petition to Annex for the proposed Sierra Heights Elementary School and Page 29 of 118 8c. ‐ Community and Economic Development Department submits 60%  Petition to Annex for the proposed Sierra Heights Elementary School and Page 30 of 118 1 CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON ORDINANCE NO. AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON ESTABLISHING THE ZONING CLASSIFICATION OF CERTAIN PROPERTY ANNEXED WITHIN THE CITY OF RENTON FROM R-6 (URBAN RESIDENTIAL 6 DWELLING UNITS PER ACRE, KING COUNTY ZONING) TO R-4 (RESIDENTIAL 4 DU/AC; FOUR DWELLING UNITS PER ACRE) (SIERRA HEIGHTS ELEMENTARY SCHOOL ANNEXATION, FILE NO. A-0-005). WHEREAS, under Section 4-2-020 of Chapter 2, Land Use Districts, of Title IV (Development Regulations) of Ordinance No. 4260 entitled “Code of General Ordinances of the City of Renton, Washington,” as amended, and the maps and reports adopted in conjunction therewith, the property hereinbelow described has not been zoned in the City of Renton; and WHEREAS, property owners petitioned the City of Renton for annexation and concurrent rezoning, which annexation having previously been approved and ordinance adopted which will annex the property to the City of Renton, and the City having held two public hearings in the matter of zoning, the first hearing being held on November 9, 2010, and the second hearing being held on June 21, 2010, and the zoning being in conformity with the City's Comprehensive Plan, as amended, and the City Council having duly considered all matters relevant thereto, and all parties having been heard appearing in support or in opposition to the proposed zoning; NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON, DOES ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS: SECTION I.The following described property in the City of Renton is hereby zoned to R-4. The annual ordinance adopting the maps of the City’s zoning ordinance is hereby amended to evidence the rezoning and the Administrator of the Community and Economic 8c. ‐ Community and Economic Development Department submits 60%  Petition to Annex for the proposed Sierra Heights Elementary School and Page 31 of 118 ORDINANCE NO. _______ 2 Development Department is hereby authorized and directed to change the maps of the zoning ordinance, as amended, to evidence the rezoning, to wit: See Exhibit “A” attached hereto and made a part hereof as if fully set forth herein. [Said property, approximately 15-acres, is generally located south of Southeast 98th Street if extended, immediately west of 132nd Avenue Southeast, north of northeast 24th Street if extended, and east of 128th Avenue Southeast if extended. SECTION II.This ordinance shall be effective upon its passage, approval, and thirty days after its publication. PASSED BY THE CITY COUNCIL this _______ day of ___________________, 2010. Bonnie I. Walton, City Clerk APPROVED BY THE MAYOR this _______ day of _______________________, 2010. Denis Law, Mayor Approved as to form: Lawrence J. Warren, City Attorney Date of Publication: ORD:1533:1/23/09:scr 8c. ‐ Community and Economic Development Department submits 60%  Petition to Annex for the proposed Sierra Heights Elementary School and Page 32 of 118 S E 9 5 t h W a y A c c e s s R d NE 21st St 1 2 6 t h A v e S E SE 100th St 1 3 2 n d A v e S E SE 102nd St NE 22nd St U n i o n A v e N E NE 24th St NE 25th Pl 1 2 8 t h A v e S E V a s h o n A v e N E NE 19th St NE 20th St SE 101st St 1 2 6 t h P l S E SE 98 t h S t 125th A v e S E W h i t m a n A v e N E NE 27th Pl Q u e e n A v e N E SE 95th Pl R e d m o n d A v e N E N E 2 2 nd Ct U n i o n C t 1 2 7 t h P l S E S E 9 9 t h S t NE 20th Ct S E 105th St Sierra Heights Elementary AnnexationRenton R-4 Zoning File Name: :\CED\Planning\GIS\GIS_projects\annexations\school_annex\sierra_heights_elem_annex\mxds\10_sierra_heights_elem_annex_R4_zone0510.mxdProduced by City of Renton (c) 2010, the City of Renton all rightsreserved. No warranties of any sort, including but not limited toaccuracy, fitness or merchantability, accompany this product. Department of Community& Economic Development Alex Pietsch, AdministratorAdriana Johnson, Planning Technician May 25, 2010 o1:5000 0 500250Feet R-4 ZoningCity Limits R-4 8c. ‐ Community and Economic Development Department submits 60%  Petition to Annex for the proposed Sierra Heights Elementary School and Page 33 of 118 1 CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON ORDINANCE NO. ________ AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON ANNEXING CERTAIN TERRITORY OF THE CITY OF RENTON (MAPLEWOOD HEIGHTS ELEMENTARY SCHOOL ANNEXATION; FILE NO. A-09-004) WHEREAS, under the provisions of RCW 35A.14.120, as amended, a petition in writing requesting that certain territory contiguous to the City of Renton, as described below, be annexed to the City of Renton, was presented and filed with the City Clerk on or about September 14, 2009. WHEREAS, prior to the filing and circulation of said petition for annexation to the City of Renton, the petitioning owners notified the City Council of their intention to commence such proceedings as provided by law, as more particularly specified in RCW 35A.14.120 and upon public hearing thereon, it having been determined and the petitioning owners having agreed to accept that portion of the City's Comprehensive Plan as it pertains to the territory including the applicable Zoning Code relating thereto; and WHEREAS, the King County Department of Assessments has examined and verified the signatures on the petition for annexation on, or about, September 29, 2009 and determined that the signatures represent at least sixty percent (60%) of the assessed value (excluding streets) of the area to be annexed, as provided by law; and WHEREAS, the Department of Community and Economic Development the City of Renton having considered and recommended the annexing of said property to the City of Renton; and 8c. ‐ Community and Economic Development Department submits 60%  Petition to Annex for the proposed Sierra Heights Elementary School and Page 34 of 118 ORDINANCE NO. _______ 2 WHEREAS, the City Council fixed November 9, 2009, as the time and place for public hearing in the City Council Chambers, City Hall, Renton, Washington, upon the petition and notice thereof having been given as provided by law; and WHEREAS, pursuant to said notices public hearings have been held at the time and place specified in the notices, and the Council having considered all matters in connection with the petition and further determined that all legal requirements and procedures of the law applicable to the petition method for annexation have been met; and WHEREAS, the King County Boundary Review Board having deemed the "Notice of Intention" approved as of March 22, 2010; and WHEREAS, the City of Renton prezoned the annexation site R-4, four units per net acre as part of the East Renton Plateau Prezone Ordinance 5254 and that zoning will become effective upon annexation; NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON, DOES ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS: SECTION I.The findings, recitals, and determinations are hereby found to be true and correct in all respects. All requirements of the law in regard to the annexation by petition method, including the provisions of RCW 35A.14.120, 130, 140, and 150 have been met. It is further determined that the petition for annexation to the City of Renton of the property and territory described below is hereby approved and granted; the following described property being contiguous to the City limits of the City of Renton is hereby annexed to the City of Renton, and such annexation to be effective on and after the approval, passage, 8c. ‐ Community and Economic Development Department submits 60%  Petition to Annex for the proposed Sierra Heights Elementary School and Page 35 of 118 ORDINANCE NO. _______ 3 and thirty days after publication of this Ordinance; and on and after said date the property shall constitute a part of the City of Renton and shall be subject to all its laws and ordinances then and thereafter in force and effect; the property being described as follows: See Exhibits “A” attached hereto and made a part hereof as if fully set forth herein [Said property, approximately 9-acres, is bordered by the existing City limits to the north, east, and west, with 146nd Avenue Southeast at the east and 144th Avenue Southeast at the west; parcel lines comprise the southern boundary.] and the owners of the property within the annexation shall be subject to the City's Comprehensive Plan and Zoning Code. SECTION II.This Ordinance shall be effective upon its passage, approval, and thirty days after its publication. A certified copy of this Ordinance shall be filed with the King County Council, State of Washington, and as otherwise provided by law. PASSED BY THE CITY COUNCIL this _______ day of ___________________, 2010. Bonnie I. Walton, City Clerk APPROVED BY THE MAYOR this _______ day of _______________________, 2010. Denis Law, Mayor 8c. ‐ Community and Economic Development Department submits 60%  Petition to Annex for the proposed Sierra Heights Elementary School and Page 36 of 118 ORDINANCE NO. _______ 4 Approved as to form: Lawrence J. Warren, City Attorney Date of Publication: ORD.+:+:ma. 8c. ‐ Community and Economic Development Department submits 60%  Petition to Annex for the proposed Sierra Heights Elementary School and Page 37 of 118 8c. ‐ Community and Economic Development Department submits 60%  Petition to Annex for the proposed Sierra Heights Elementary School and Page 38 of 118 CITY OF RENTON COUNCIL AGENDA BILL Subject/Title: Lease with the Renton Community Foundation for Suite 100 in the Liberty Park Community Building Meeting: Regular Council - 07 Jun 2010 Exhibits: Issue Paper Lease Submitting Data: Dept/Div/Board: Community Services Staff Contact: Peter Renner, Facilities Director Recommended Action: Refer to Finance Committee Fiscal Impact: Expenditure Required: $ Transfer Amendment: $ Amount Budgeted: $ Revenue Generated: $$7200 per year Total Project Budget: $ City Share Total Project: $ SUMMARY OF ACTION: The Renton Community Foundation wishes to lease Suite 100 at the Liberty Park Community Building for a term of two years with two one-year renewals. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Authorize the Mayor and City Clerk to sign the Lease. 8d. ‐ Community Services Department recommends approval of a two‐ year lease agreement in the amount of $7,200 per year with the Renton Page 39 of 118 h:\facilities\facilities director\peter renner\peter renner 2010\issuepaperRCFLease.doc COMMUNITY SERVICES DEPARTMENT M E M O R A N D U M DATE:June 1, 2010 TO:Don Persson, Council President Members of the Renton City Council VIA:Denis Law, Mayor FROM:Terry Higashiyama, Community Services Administrator STAFF CONTACT:Peter Renner, Facilities Director, Ext. 6605 SUBJECT:Lease with the Renton Community Foundation for Suite 100 at the Liberty Park Community Building Issue: Should the Council authorize the Mayor and City Clerk to sign the Lease with the Renton Community Foundation (RCF) for Suite 100 at the Liberty Park Community Building (LCPB)? Recommendation: Council concur to authorize the Mayor and City Clerk to sign the Lease with the RCF. Background: ·The City upgraded the LCPB in 2008 and it was used as temporary office space for the Community Services Department while annexation-related modifications at Renton City Hall were completed. The building is now vacant. ·The City learned that RCF was interested in leasing some of the space in the LCPB. ·Current market rates were provided by GVA Kidder Matthews as a basis for the proposed lease rate. ·The lease is a full-service lease that includes utilities and minimal levels of custodial support. ·Provisions for shared use of the largest open space in the building are included in the lease; this allows RCF to hold occasional meetings there and also allows the City to add this area to its inventory of space available to rent to outside groups for their meetings. ·There is additional space for lease in the LPCB. Conclusion: Leasing space in the LPCB to the RCF provides additional revenue to the City and having an occupant in the building reduces building vulnerability to vandalism and break-ins. cc:Jay Covington, Chief Administrative Officer Iwen Wang, Finance & IS Administrator Larry Warren, City Attorney 8d. ‐ Community Services Department recommends approval of a two‐ year lease agreement in the amount of $7,200 per year with the Renton Page 40 of 118 8d. ‐ Community Services Department recommends approval of a two‐ year lease agreement in the amount of $7,200 per year with the Renton Page 41 of 118 8d. ‐ Community Services Department recommends approval of a two‐ year lease agreement in the amount of $7,200 per year with the Renton Page 42 of 118 8d. ‐ Community Services Department recommends approval of a two‐ year lease agreement in the amount of $7,200 per year with the Renton Page 43 of 118 8d. ‐ Community Services Department recommends approval of a two‐ year lease agreement in the amount of $7,200 per year with the Renton Page 44 of 118 8d. ‐ Community Services Department recommends approval of a two‐ year lease agreement in the amount of $7,200 per year with the Renton Page 45 of 118 8d. ‐ Community Services Department recommends approval of a two‐ year lease agreement in the amount of $7,200 per year with the Renton Page 46 of 118 8d. ‐ Community Services Department recommends approval of a two‐ year lease agreement in the amount of $7,200 per year with the Renton Page 47 of 118 8d. ‐ Community Services Department recommends approval of a two‐ year lease agreement in the amount of $7,200 per year with the Renton Page 48 of 118 8d. ‐ Community Services Department recommends approval of a two‐ year lease agreement in the amount of $7,200 per year with the Renton Page 49 of 118 8d. ‐ Community Services Department recommends approval of a two‐ year lease agreement in the amount of $7,200 per year with the Renton Page 50 of 118 8d. ‐ Community Services Department recommends approval of a two‐ year lease agreement in the amount of $7,200 per year with the Renton Page 51 of 118 CITY OF RENTON COUNCIL AGENDA BILL Subject/Title: Bid opening on May 20, 2010, for CAG-10-054, Westhill Reservoir Recoat & Upgrade 2010 Meeting: Regular Council - 07 Jun 2010 Exhibits: Staff Recommendation Bid Tabulation Sheet (nine bids) Submitting Data: Dept/Div/Board: Executive Staff Contact: Bonnie Walton Recommended Action: Refer to Utilities Committee Fiscal Impact: Expenditure Required: $ 385,303.13 Transfer Amendment: $ Amount Budgeted: $ Revenue Generated: $ Total Project Budget: $ 408,000 City Share Total Project: $ SUMMARY OF ACTION: Engineer's Estimate: $465,922.50 In accordance with Council procedure, bids submitted at the subject bid opening met the following three criteria: There was more than one bid, and there were no significant irregularities with the low bid. However, the cost of construction in addition to staff time, engineering services, special inspection services, and permitting and contingency are over the budgeted amount appropriated for this project. Therefore staff recommends acceptance of the low bid submitted by Coatings Unlimited, Inc. in the amount of $385,303.13; and to refer the bid to the Utilities Committee for discussion of funding. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Accept the low bid submitted by Coatings Unlimited, Inc. in the amount of $385,303.13 subject to discussion of funding. 8e. ‐ City Clerk reports bid opening on 5/20/2010 for CAG‐10‐054,  Westhill Reservoir Recoat & Upgrade 2010 project; nine bids; engineer’s Page 52 of 118 PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT ^-^hf""^ mraa© MEMORANDUM !TY OF RENTON DATE: June 2,2010 JUN 41 % 2010 TO: Bonnie Walton, City Clerk RECEIVED CITY CLERK'S OFFICE FROM: Tom Malphrus, Water Utility Engineer (ext. 7313) /?/H- SUBJECT: Bid Opening for Water Utility Project, WTR-27-3488 At 2:30 p.m. on Thursday, May 20, 2010, the City of Renton held the bid opening for the Water Utility's West Hill Reservoir Recoat and Upgrade 2010 project. The City received nine bids, the City Clerk publicly opened and read all nine bids in Conference Room 519, Renton City Hall. Coatings Unlimited, Inc., of Kent, WA, submitted the apparent low bid in the amount of $385,303.13. The engineer's estimate for this project is $465,922.50. There was one addendum issued during the bid period. Coatings Unlimited did not provide acknowledgement of receipt of the addendum in their bid package. The second lowest bidder, Long Painting Company, submitted a protest to the City Clerk on June 1, 2010, claiming that Coating Unlimited's failure to acknowledge receipt of Addendum No.l with their bid package provided them with an unfair advantage. The City Attorney has determined that Long Painting Company's protest was not submitted in a timely manner as required by RCW 39.04.105. The City Attorney's advice is that we may recommend the City Council accept the bid submitted by Coatings Unlimited. In accordance with Council procedure, Coating Unlimited's bid meets two of the three conditions for award: 1. There must be more than one bidder. 2. The lowest responsive, responsible bid contains no significant irregularities. However, their bid did not meet the third condition. 3. The low bid must be within the total project budget. The Water Utility must re-appropriate funds to increase the total project budget to allow for construction of the project. 8e. ‐ City Clerk reports bid opening on 5/20/2010 for CAG‐10‐054,  Westhill Reservoir Recoat & Upgrade 2010 project; nine bids; engineer’s Page 53 of 118 Ms. Walton, City Clerk June 2, 2010 Page 2 of 2 The Water Utility has an appropriated budget of $408,000 for this project in our 2010 Capital Improvement Program budget, account number 425/455140. The project budget must cover staff time, engineering services, special inspection services, permitting and contingency. The cost of these items along with the construction contract cannot be covered by the $408,000 appropriated for this project. The Water Utility recommends that Council accept the low bid submitted by Coatings Unlimited and refer the bid to the Utilities Committee for discussion on the re- appropriation of funding to cover the total budget for this project. If you have any questions or need additional information regarding this bid, please contact me. Attachments cc: Lys Hornsby, Utility Systems Director Abdoul Gafour, Water Utility Supervisor ] H:\Flle Sys\WTR - Drinking Water Utility\WTR-27 - Water Project Files\WTR-27-3488 Recoat West Hill Reservoir2009\Contractor\CityClerk-BidAwardRevl.doc\TMah 8e. ‐ City Clerk reports bid opening on 5/20/2010 for CAG‐10‐054,  Westhill Reservoir Recoat & Upgrade 2010 project; nine bids; engineer’s Page 54 of 118 CITY OF RENTON BID TABULATION SHEET PROJECT: West Hill Reservoir Recoat & Upgrade 2010 - WTR-27-3488 CAG-10-054 DATE: May 20, 2010 Page 1 of 1 BIDDER FORMS Proposal / Triple Form Bid Bond L&l Cert Sched. Of Prices Adden #1 BID **lncludes Sales Tax Advanced Construction, Inc. 4640 Campus Place, Suite 150 Mukilteo, WA 98275 AJ Smith Coatings Unlimited, Inc. 18420 68th Av S, #110 Kent, WA 98032 Greg Snider F.D. Thomas, Inc 217 Bateman Drive Central Point, OR 97502 F. Dan Thomas HCI Industrial & Marine Coatings, Inc. 15500 NE Caples Rd Brush Prairie, WA 98606 Joseph R. Cornelius Long Painting Company 21414 68th Av SE Kent, WA 98032 Denica Bucklin Purcell Painting & Coatings 6456 S 144th St. Tukwila, WA 98168 David Purcell T Bailey, Inc. 12441 Bartholomew Road Anacortes, WA 98221 Gene Tanaka Washington Industrial Coatings, Inc. P.O. Box 3877 Silverdale, WA 98383 NickSabelhus Western Industrial Inc. 1903133rd Avenue West, Suite 205 Lynnwood, WA 98036 Mark Jackson X $469,207.50 $385,303.13 $545,386.65 $492,202.50 $421,575.00 $442,640.00 $466,470.00 $548,165.26 $436,029.00 ENGINEER'S ESTIMATE LEGEND: Forms: Triple Form: Non-Collusion Affidavit, Anti-Trust Claims, Minimum Wage $465,922.50 8e. ‐ City Clerk reports bid opening on 5/20/2010 for CAG‐10‐054,  Westhill Reservoir Recoat & Upgrade 2010 project; nine bids; engineer’s Page 55 of 118 CITY OF RENTON COUNCIL AGENDA BILL Subject/Title: GIS Coordinator Meeting: Regular Council - 07 Jun 2010 Exhibits: Submitting Data: Dept/Div/Board: Finance & Information Services Staff Contact: Iwen Wang, Administrator Recommended Action: Refer to Finance Committee Fiscal Impact: Expenditure Required: $ Transfer Amendment: $ Amount Budgeted: $ Revenue Generated: $ Total Project Budget: $ City Share Total Project: $ SUMMARY OF ACTION: In 2009 Council approved a centralized and enterprise approach to expand the capabilities of the City's Geographical Information Systems (GIS). The project funding includes a GIS Coordinator and a GIS Analyst position for a period of two years to help establish city-wide standards, consolidate data from various departmental sources into centralized databases, as well as coordinating a city-wide approach in expanding the City's GIS program. Earlier this year, we advertised for the GIS Coordinator position and received 23 applications. Of this pool of applicants, there were 11 that had the minimum requirements, of which we selected 8 for interviews and testing. Of those that were interviewed and tested only one candidate from Ohio passed the oral interview. We offered the position to the candidate who declined the offer due to challenges in relocating the household. We believe the low turnout of qualified candidates is related to the limited-term nature of the position. Staff is requesting to convert the GIS Coordinator position to a regular position with the intent to review the results of the program to determine the future of the position upon the completion of the startup phase. We believe the change will allow us to attract more qualified candidates and to provide better leadership and stability for the citywide GIS services. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Approve the conversion of the two-year term GIS Coordinator position to a regular full-time position. 8f. ‐ Finance and Information Services Department requests  authorization to convert a two‐year limited term Geographical Page 56 of 118 CITY OF RENTON COUNCIL AGENDA BILL Subject/Title: Resolution Approving Interlocal Purchasing ILA (Interlocal Agreement) Meeting: Regular Council - 07 Jun 2010 Exhibits: Resolution Intergovernmental Cooperative Purchasing Agreement Submitting Data: Dept/Div/Board: Finance & Information Services Staff Contact: Gina Jarvis, Fiscal Services Director Recommended Action: Refer to Finance Committee Fiscal Impact: Expenditure Required: $ $5,000/Year Transfer Amendment: $ Amount Budgeted: $ $5,000/Year Revenue Generated: $ Total Project Budget: $ City Share Total Project: $ SUMMARY OF ACTION: The Department of General Administration (GA) is a central services department for the State of Washington that provides all state agencies and local government entities access to contracts that are the result of the competitive bidding processes consistent with the state law. The City has been using the contracts from GA for vehicles, copiers, and other goods and service for many years. It was brought to our attention recently as a result of updating purchasing policies that the City does not have a properly executed interlocal agreement with the State for the same. Therefore staff recommends Council approve the attached resolution and authorize the Mayor and the City Clerk to execute the interlocal agreement to complete the City’s records. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Adopt the resolution to approve the attached Interlocal Agreement with the State of Washington Department of General Administration and to authorize Mayor and City Clerk execute the agreement. 8g. ‐ Finance and Information Services Department recommends  approval of an interlocal cooperative purchasing agreement in the Page 57 of 118 8g. ‐ Finance and Information Services Department recommends  approval of an interlocal cooperative purchasing agreement in the Page 58 of 118 8g. ‐ Finance and Information Services Department recommends  approval of an interlocal cooperative purchasing agreement in the Page 59 of 118 1 of 4 State of Washington DEPARTMENT OF GENERAL ADMINISTRATION Office of State Procurement Rm. 201 General Administration Building, P.O. Box 41017 l Olympia, Washington 98504-1017 l 360-902-7400 http://www.ga.wa.gov DATE: Nov 6, 2009 TO:State Purchasing Cooperative Members FROM:Lauri Wilson, State Purchasing Cooperative Manager SUBJECT:2010/11 Membership Thank you for being a valuable member of the State Purchasing Cooperative Program. The current membership expires on December 31, 2009, so we hope you choose to renew your membership. We will continue to require a two-year membership when you join the state purchasing cooperative program. This allows us to maintain the current fees, which haven’t gone up since 1995. This time around we have simplified the process of determining your participation fee. We have included it in the attached inter-local agreement (ILA). To determine your participation fee, we used publicly reported information from the following sources: Office of Superintendent of Public Instruction (OSPI) for school districts, State Auditor’s Office (SAO) for those audited by the SAO, or audited financial reports for non-profit organizations. This is the same data and sources that we’ve used in the past. The difference is that you don’t have to determine your fee; we’ve done it for you. The ILA is your invoice if you desire to pay it in full. Or the Office of State Procurement (OSP) will issue quarterly invoices for remittance due and payable within 30 days of receipt or due date shown on invoice whichever is sooner. Please complete the ILA and return two copies with original signatures, by December 31, 2009 to: State of Washington OSP PAF-Non/Prof Fund: 422 04 20 000214 Room 303 General Administration Bldg. P.O. Box 41008 Olympia, WA 98504-1008 If you are a non-profit entity, please also include: 1)Documentation of recent public funding 2)Your 501(c)3 IRS approval One original ILA will be returned to you once approved and signed by the Department. If you do not want to participate in the 2010/2011 membership term, your organization must not use any contracts after December 31, 2009 or your organization is responsible for the entire two-year fee. It has never been a better time to be a purchasing cooperative member. By utilizing the provided contracts you will get substantial savings on goods and services and save time on the purchasing process, so you can focus on your other work. Government members have access to more than 300 contracts. Non-profit members have access to more than 190 contracts. The state purchasing cooperative program has more than 650 members. For more information about the two-year membership fee, contact Lauri Wilson at 360-902-7415 or lauri.wilson@ga.wa.gov For more information about the state purchasing cooperative program, go to: http://www.ga.wa.gov/PCA/spc.htm 8g. ‐ Finance and Information Services Department recommends  approval of an interlocal cooperative purchasing agreement in the Page 60 of 118 2 of 4 State of Washington DEPARTMENT OF GENERAL ADMINISTRATION Office of State Procurement Rm. 201 General Administration Building, P.O. Box 41017 Olympia, Washington 98504-1017 (360) 902-7400 http://www.ga.wa.gov STATE OF WASHINGTON INTERGOVERNMENTAL AGREEMENT FOR STATE PURCHASING COOPERATIVE Pursuant to Chapter 43.19 RCW, Chapter 39.34 RCW and WAC 236-49-060, the State of Washington, Department of General Administration, Office of State Procurement, (“Office of State Procurement” or “OSP”), and City of Renton (“Cooperative Member”) agree to enter into this Intergovernmental Agreement ( “Agreement”), for the purpose of the Cooperative Member participating in the State Purchasing Cooperative Program (“Cooperative”) under the following terms and conditions: 1)Washington State political subdivisions (e.g. local governments and school districts) and public benefit nonprofit corporations are eligible for membership in the Cooperative and must be subject to audit by Washington State Auditor’s Office (SAO). Offices, departments, divisions, or other sub-units (“subdivisions”) within Washington State political subdivisions and public benefit nonprofit corporations may join the Cooperative. However, the subdivision’s membership fee will be assessed at the rate of the associated Washington State political subdivision or public benefit nonprofit corporations. Washington state agencies and their subdivisions are automatically Cooperative Members and do not need to apply for membership or pay a membership fee. 2)The Office of State Procurement is required to recover the costs of administering the State Purchasing Cooperative Program from Cooperative Members. The Membership Fee Schedule below sets forth the fee structure for Cooperative Members, which are not Washington State agencies. The Membership Fee Schedule is based on the Cooperative Member’s total expenditures, less debt service and inter-fund transfers, as reported in the Cooperative Member’s last audited financial statement. 3)The term of this Agreement and Cooperative membership is January 1, 2010 through December 31, 2011. This Agreement may be canceled in writing by either party. However; if the Cooperative Member has used state contracts during the current membership period; the Cooperative Member remains liable to pay any unpaid balance of the membership fee for the entire term. Fees are not based on the level of contract usage. Refunds will not be given to members due to lack of contract usage. 4)The Office of the Superintendent of Public Instruction (OSPI) financial reporting information will be used to verify fee amounts for public school districts, and Educational Service Districts. (ESD’s). 5)Any Cooperative Member not reported in the OSPI or State Auditor’s financial reporting information, must submit a copy of its most recent audited financial statements to OSP upon request. When a Cooperative Member does not have audited financial statements, the Cooperative Member shall provide internal budgets or financial statements. Once membership fees are verified through such authoritative sources, OSP will issue quarterly invoices for remittance due and payable within 30 days of receipt or due date shown on invoice whichever is sooner. After initial verification and at the beginning of each calendar quarter thereafter, invoices will be sent via electronic mail to the contact listed below. 6)This executed Agreement entitles the Cooperative Member access to state contracts for goods and services as viewed on www.ga.wa.gov. Cooperative Members may only access Western States Contracting Alliance (WSCA) contracts where Washington is the lead state, or has a signed a participating addendum (PA). Cooperative Members are not authorized to enter into separate WSCA participating addenda with vendors. Cooperative Members are also entitled to use Oregon Purchasing Contracts, 7)If a Washington State political subdivision or public benefit nonprofit corporation or a subdivision thereof that is not a current Cooperative Member is found to have used a state contract, WSCA contract, or Oregon 8g. ‐ Finance and Information Services Department recommends  approval of an interlocal cooperative purchasing agreement in the Page 61 of 118 3 of 4 Purchasing Contract; that Washington State political subdivision or public benefit nonprofit corporation shall be liable for payment of a full year membership fee. Failure to pay such fee may be reported to the State Auditor’s Office and result in audit findings against the entity. 8)The Office of State Procurement, in contracting on behalf of the State of Washington for the purchase of goods and services according to the laws and regulations governing such purchases, agrees to also contract on behalf of the Cooperative Member, to the extent permitted by law. The Cooperative Member accepts responsibility for compliance with any additional laws and regulations applicable to the Cooperative Member. 9)The Office of State Procurement agrees to comply with its statutory requirements regarding notice for bids or proposals for goods or services subject to this Agreement, and will either: a) post the bid or solicitation notice on a web site established and maintained by OSP for the purposes of posting public notice of bid or proposal solicitations, or b) provide an access link on the State of Washington’s web portal to the notice. 10)When the Office of the State Procurement has entered into a contractual agreement for the purchase of goods or services on behalf of Cooperative Member, the Cooperative Member may purchase goods and services covered by the contract on the same terms and conditions as the State of Washington, except that the contractor has the right to modify payment terms based on its credit assessment of the Cooperative Member. Purchases by the Cooperative Member may be made by a purchase order issued by the Cooperative Member to the contractor. The Cooperative Member is solely responsible for payment for any goods and services it purchases under contracts pursuant to this Agreement or services it purchases directly from OSP. The Cooperative Member agrees to be responsible for limited contract monitoring related to their use of these contracts. 11)The Cooperative Member reserves the right to contract independently for the purchase of any particular class of goods or services, with or without notice being given to OSP. 12)In the event that either the Office of the State Procurement or the Cooperative Member is abolished, this Agreement shall continue in operation as to any entity succeeding to the powers and duties of the abolished party, except as canceled or modified by operation of law. 13)The Cooperative Member agrees to use only those OSP, WSCA, or Oregon Purchasing contracts authorized under the terms of this Agreement and to comply with those contracts’ terms and conditions. The Cooperative Member further agrees that all purchases from OSP, WSCA, or Oregon Purchasing contracts will be made only for the direct use of the Cooperative Member’s programs and no purchases will be made on behalf of or for the use of other entities or jurisdictions. 14)It is not the intention of the parties, nor shall this Agreement be interpreted, to create a separate legal entity for the performance of this Agreement. Instead, the Office of State Procurement shall be responsible for administering this Agreement. 15)In accordance with RCW 39.34.040; the Cooperative Member shall be responsible for filing the executed copy of this Agreement with its county auditor’s office, or filed in such manner as required by law, to meet public disclosure requirements. This may include listing on the Cooperative Member’s internet site or any other electronically retrievable public source. 16)By its signature below, the Office of State Procurement confirms it approves of this Agreement as required by RCW 39.34.050 and it is authorized to enter into this Agreement pursuant to RCW 39.34.030 and RCW 39.34.080. Similarly, by its signature below, the Cooperative Member confirms it is authorized to enter into this Agreement pursuant to RCW 39.34.030 and RCW 39.34.080. 17)PAYMENT and NOTICES: Payment shall be made to OSP at the address provided below. Further, any notice, demand or other communication required or permitted to be given under this Agreement shall be made to the parties at the addresses provided below. The Cooperative Member agrees to pay the membership fee as a part of this Agreement. Late payments may be subject to statutory interest and collection related costs. First time Cooperative Members joining after June 30th may have their fee prorated, if the member has not previously accessed state contracts. Pro-rated fees will be based on 6-month intervals, January – June, June – December. Mail the signed Agreement and payment to: State of Washington, OSP PAF-Non/Prof Fund: 422 04 20 000214, Room 303 General Administration Bldg., P.O. Box 41008, Olympia, WA 98504-1008 8g. ‐ Finance and Information Services Department recommends  approval of an interlocal cooperative purchasing agreement in the Page 62 of 118 4 of 4 Cooperative Member contact information: Contact Person to whom contract documents and related communications are to be mailed or faxed. Cooperative Member Agency Name: __________________________________________ Agency Federal TIN #: ____________________________________________________ Contact Name: _________________________________________________________ Address: _________________________________________________________ City, St. Zip _________________________________________________________ Phone Number: __________________________Fax Number: ____________________ Email Address: _________________________________________________________ Secondary Contact: Name: _________________________Email:___________________ Two-Year Membership Fee Schedule Note: Total expenditures listed below are minus of debt service and inter-fund transfers Annual expenditures of more than Annual expenditures of less than Two-Year Membership Fee Verified Fee Level $0.00 $3,000,000 $400 $3,000,001 $7,500,000 $1,000 $7,500,001 $30,000,000 $2,000 $30,000,001 $68,000,000 $4,000 $68,000,001 $90,000,000 $6,000 $90,000,001 $150,000,000 $8,000 $150,000,001 and over $10,000 According to the most recent authoritative information; City of Renton, your annual operating expenditures were $163,739,339.00 making your two-year fee $10,000.00. The undersigned has read, understands and agrees to the terms and conditions of this Agreement, certifies that he/she is the Authorized Signatory for the Cooperative Member, and certifies under penalty of perjury under the laws of Washington State that the verified expenditure in the Membership Fee Schedule above is true and correct. Cooperative Member Authorized Signature: Signature: ___________________________________________________Date Signed: ________________ Print Name: _____________________________________Title: ____________________________________ Address (if not the same as above): _________________________________________________________ Phone Number(s): _______________________________________________________________________ FOR OSP USE ONLY (Completed by OSP, this page will be returned to you in executed copy) Approved as to form: AAG Date: 10/16/2009 (signature on file) Your assigned Co-op member number is ______________. Please provide this number to vendors when ordering from contracts or communicating with OSP. OSP AUTHORIZED SIGNATURE _______________________________________________________ Verification Used:_______________ Name Title Date 8g. ‐ Finance and Information Services Department recommends  approval of an interlocal cooperative purchasing agreement in the Page 63 of 118 CITY OF RENTON COUNCIL AGENDA BILL Subject/Title: Interlocal Agreement with Valley Medical Center Occupational Health Services for 2010-2012 Meeting: Regular Council - 07 Jun 2010 Exhibits: Interlocal Agreement Exhibit A Resolution Submitting Data: Dept/Div/Board: Fire & Emergency Services Staff Contact: Acting Deputy Chief,Greg Hartman (7028), Safety & Support Services Recommended Action: Council Concur Fiscal Impact: Expenditure Required: $ $63,000.00 Transfer Amendment: $N/A Amount Budgeted: $ $75,000.00 Revenue Generated: $N/A Total Project Budget: $ $63,000.00 City Share Total Project: $ N/A SUMMARY OF ACTION: The attached interlocal agreement allows Renton Fire & Emergency Services to obtain Wellness Examinations and related medical services and laboratory testing for its firefighters from Valley Medical Occupational Health Services. Exhibit A summarizes the exam cost estimates based on age or medical need accordingly. The 2010 Cost Estimate is $62,395.00; 2011 Cost Estimate is $61,650.00 and the 2012 Cost Estimate is $56,315.00 for this three year agreement effective from 2010 - 2012. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Approve the Resolution authorizing the Mayor and City Clerk to execute the Interlocal Agreement. 8h. ‐ Fire and Emergency Services Department recommends approval an  interlocal agreement with Valley Medical Center Occupational Health Page 64 of 118 8h. ‐ Fire and Emergency Services Department recommends approval an  interlocal agreement with Valley Medical Center Occupational Health Page 65 of 118 8h. ‐ Fire and Emergency Services Department recommends approval an  interlocal agreement with Valley Medical Center Occupational Health Page 66 of 118 8h. ‐ Fire and Emergency Services Department recommends approval an  interlocal agreement with Valley Medical Center Occupational Health Page 67 of 118 8h. ‐ Fire and Emergency Services Department recommends approval an  interlocal agreement with Valley Medical Center Occupational Health Page 68 of 118 8h. ‐ Fire and Emergency Services Department recommends approval an  interlocal agreement with Valley Medical Center Occupational Health Page 69 of 118 8h. ‐ Fire and Emergency Services Department recommends approval an  interlocal agreement with Valley Medical Center Occupational Health Page 70 of 118 8h. ‐ Fire and Emergency Services Department recommends approval an  interlocal agreement with Valley Medical Center Occupational Health Page 71 of 118 8h. ‐ Fire and Emergency Services Department recommends approval an  interlocal agreement with Valley Medical Center Occupational Health Page 72 of 118 8h. ‐ Fire and Emergency Services Department recommends approval an  interlocal agreement with Valley Medical Center Occupational Health Page 73 of 118 8h. ‐ Fire and Emergency Services Department recommends approval an  interlocal agreement with Valley Medical Center Occupational Health Page 74 of 118 8h. ‐ Fire and Emergency Services Department recommends approval an  interlocal agreement with Valley Medical Center Occupational Health Page 75 of 118 8h. ‐ Fire and Emergency Services Department recommends approval an  interlocal agreement with Valley Medical Center Occupational Health Page 76 of 118 8h. ‐ Fire and Emergency Services Department recommends approval an  interlocal agreement with Valley Medical Center Occupational Health Page 77 of 118 8h. ‐ Fire and Emergency Services Department recommends approval an  interlocal agreement with Valley Medical Center Occupational Health Page 78 of 118 CITY OF RENTON COUNCIL AGENDA BILL Subject/Title: Preventing Auto Theft Through Regional Operational Links (P.A.T.R.O.L.) Meeting: Regular Council - 07 Jun 2010 Exhibits: Issue Paper Interlocal Agreement Resolution Submitting Data: Dept/Div/Board: Police Staff Contact: Kevin Milosevich, Chief of Police Recommended Action: Council Concur Fiscal Impact: Expenditure Required: $ 0 Transfer Amendment: $0 Amount Budgeted: $ 0 Revenue Generated: $0 Total Project Budget: $ 0 City Share Total Project: $ 0 SUMMARY OF ACTION: The Elizabeth Nowak-Washington Auto theft Prevention Act was enacted during the 2007 Regular Legislative Session and signed into law effective July 1, 2007. The Act created WATPA, Washington Auto Theft Prevention Authority under the direction of the Washington Association of Sheriffs and Police Chiefs. This program is funded through a $10 surcharge on all traffic infractions. The P.A.T.R.O.L., Preventing Auto Theft through Regional Operational Links Task Force was created about a year ago as a program funded under the WATPA. The Renton Police Department provides one detective to the P.A.T.R.O.L. Task Force. His salary is reimbursed by WATPA. Since formed, the Task Force has investigated and prosecuted many individuals involved in large scale auto theft rings. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Approve and authorize Mayor Law to sign the interlocal agreement for the P.A.T.R.O.L. Task Force. 8i. ‐ Police Department recommends approval of the Preventing Auto  Theft through Regional Operational Links (P.A.T.R.O.L.) interlocal Page 79 of 118 POLICE DEPARTMENT M E M O R A N D U M DATE:April 19, 2010 TO:Don Persson, Council President Members of the Renton City Council VIA: Denis Law, Mayor FROM: STAFF CONTACT: Kevin Milosevich, Chief of Police Chad Karlewicz, Police Commander (Ext 7640) SUBJECT:P.A.T.R.O.L. (Preventing Auto Theft through Regional Operational Links) Task Force Inter-local Agreement ISSUE: Should the City of Renton enter into an Inter-local agreement regarding the structure and operation of the P.A.T.R.O.L. (Preventing Auto Theft through Regional Operational Links) Task Force with the municipalities of Auburn, Beaux Arts Village, Bonney Lake, Burien, Covington, Des Moines, Federal Way, Kent, Maple Valley, Newcastle, Pacific, SeaTac, Sumner, Tukwila, the Muckleshoot Reservation, the King County Sheriff’s Office and the Port of Seattle? BACKGROUND: As a result of the Washington Legislature’s desire to change auto theft trends, Engrossed 3rd Substitute House Bill 1001 (the Elizabeth Nowak-Washington Auto Theft Prevention Act) was enacted during the 2007 Regular Legislative Session. It was signed into law by Governor Gregoire and became effective July 1, 2007. The Act included amendments to existing law and enactment of new law so that motor vehicle theft and possession of a stolen motor vehicle are now separate crimes from the theft laws. In addition to other changes dealing with motor vehicle theft, the Act created the Washington Auto Theft Prevention Authority (WATPA) under the direction of the Washington Association of Sheriffs and Police Chiefs (WASPC). The Authority consists of 10 Governor Appointees serving staggered terms. Representatives of law enforcement, prosecution, the auto industry, the insurance industry, the Washington Association of Sheriffs and Police Chiefs and the private sector are included as members of the Authority. The Authority staff includes an executive director, a public awareness coordinator, and an administrative assistant. This program is funded through a $10 8i. ‐ Police Department recommends approval of the Preventing Auto  Theft through Regional Operational Links (P.A.T.R.O.L.) interlocal Page 80 of 118 Page 2 of 2 surcharge on all traffic infractions. The P.A.T.R.O.L. (Preventing Auto Theft through Regional Operational Links) Task Force came into existence about a year ago as a program funded under the Washington Auto Theft Prevention Authority. It is a regional task force operated and staffed between the agencies of Auburn, Beaux Arts Village, Bonney Lake, Burien, Covington, Des Moines, Federal Way, Kent, Maple Valley, Newcastle, Pacific, Renton, SeaTac, Sumner, Tukwila, the Muckleshoot Reservation, the King County Sheriff’s Office and the Port of Seattle, with the expressed intent of preventing and reducing auto theft in these jurisdictions. The P.A.T.R.O.L. Task Force has five investigators and a part-time prosecutor assigned to it. Currently, the Renton Police Department provides one detective to the P.A.T.R.O.L. Task Force. Since the P.A.T.R.O.L. Task Force was formed, they have had a good deal of success. They have investigated and prosecuted many individuals involved in large scale auto theft rings. The structure and operation of this task force has been laid out in an inter-local agreement between the participating agencies. It was decided to have this inter-local agreement signed by the participating agencies in alphabetical order. This decision resulted in the delay of the City of Renton receiving the inter-local agreement. RECOMMENDATION: Approve and authorize Mayor Law to sign the Inter-local Agreement for the P.A.T.R.O.L. Task Force. 8i. ‐ Police Department recommends approval of the Preventing Auto  Theft through Regional Operational Links (P.A.T.R.O.L.) interlocal Page 81 of 118 8i. ‐ Police Department recommends approval of the Preventing Auto  Theft through Regional Operational Links (P.A.T.R.O.L.) interlocal Page 82 of 118 8i. ‐ Police Department recommends approval of the Preventing Auto  Theft through Regional Operational Links (P.A.T.R.O.L.) interlocal Page 83 of 118 8i. ‐ Police Department recommends approval of the Preventing Auto  Theft through Regional Operational Links (P.A.T.R.O.L.) interlocal Page 84 of 118 8i. ‐ Police Department recommends approval of the Preventing Auto  Theft through Regional Operational Links (P.A.T.R.O.L.) interlocal Page 85 of 118 8i. ‐ Police Department recommends approval of the Preventing Auto  Theft through Regional Operational Links (P.A.T.R.O.L.) interlocal Page 86 of 118 8i. ‐ Police Department recommends approval of the Preventing Auto  Theft through Regional Operational Links (P.A.T.R.O.L.) interlocal Page 87 of 118 8i. ‐ Police Department recommends approval of the Preventing Auto  Theft through Regional Operational Links (P.A.T.R.O.L.) interlocal Page 88 of 118 8i. ‐ Police Department recommends approval of the Preventing Auto  Theft through Regional Operational Links (P.A.T.R.O.L.) interlocal Page 89 of 118 8i. ‐ Police Department recommends approval of the Preventing Auto  Theft through Regional Operational Links (P.A.T.R.O.L.) interlocal Page 90 of 118 8i. ‐ Police Department recommends approval of the Preventing Auto  Theft through Regional Operational Links (P.A.T.R.O.L.) interlocal Page 91 of 118 8i. ‐ Police Department recommends approval of the Preventing Auto  Theft through Regional Operational Links (P.A.T.R.O.L.) interlocal Page 92 of 118 CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON, AUTHORIZING THE MAYOR AND CITY CLERK TO ENTER INTO AN INTERLOCAL COOPERATIVE AGREEMENT BETWEEN AUBURN, BEAUX ARTS VILLAGE, BONNIE LAKE, BURIEN, COVINGTON, DES MOINES, FEDERAL WAY, KENT, MAPLE VALLEY, NEWCASTLE, PACIFIC, RENTON, SEATAC, SUMNER, TUKWILA, THE MUCKLESHOOT INDIAN RESERVATION, THE KING COUNTY SHERRIFF'S OFFICE AND THE PORT OF SEATTLE FOR THE CREATION OF THE PATROL AUTO THEFT TASK FORCE. WHEREAS, political subdivisions of the state are authorized by the Interlocal Cooperation Act, RCW 39.34, to enter into interlocal agreements; and WHEREAS, the Mutual Aid Peace Officers Powers Act, RCW 10.93, allows for the provision of mutual aid by and between law enforcement agencies; and WHEREAS, municipalities within the Puget Sound area have experienced increased urbanization and population densities which has resulted in an increase in crimes associated with auto theft; and WHEREAS, the ability to address auto theft and the crimes associated with it has stretched the resources of individual police department investigative units; and WHEREAS, multi-jurisdictional efforts to handle specific and complicated auto theft investigations will result in more effective pooling of personnel, improved utilization of funds, equipment, training, expertise, information sharing, and increased utilization/application of a combined auto theft task force; and WHEREAS, the results of a multi-jurisdictional effort will improve services for all of the jurisdictions, increase safety for the community, and improve auto theft prosecution; and WHEREAS, the municipalities of Auburn, Beaux Arts Village, Bonnie Lake, Burien, Covington, Des Moines, Federal Way, Kent, Maple Valley, Newcastle, Pacific, Renton, Seatac, 1 8i. ‐ Police Department recommends approval of the Preventing Auto  Theft through Regional Operational Links (P.A.T.R.O.L.) interlocal Page 93 of 118 RESOLUTION NO. Sumner, Tukwila, the Muckleshoot Indian Reservation, the King County Sherriff's office, and the Port of Seattle intend to establish and maintain a multi-jurisdictional team, known as the P.A.T.R.O.L. Task Force to handle specific and complicated auto theft investigations; and WHEREAS, it is necessary to document the terms and conditions under which the P.A.T.R.O.L. Task Force will operate; NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON, DOES RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS: SECTION I. The above findings are true and correct in all respects. SECTION II. The Mayor and City Clerk are hereby authorized to enter into an interlocal cooperative agreement to establish and maintain the P.A.T.R.O.L. Task Force. PASSED BY THE CITY COUNCIL this day of , 2010. Bonnie I. Walton, City Clerk APPROVED BY THE MAYOR this day of , 2010. Denis Law, Mayor Approved as to form: Lawrence J. Warren, City Attorney RES.1451:5/7/10:scr 8i. ‐ Police Department recommends approval of the Preventing Auto  Theft through Regional Operational Links (P.A.T.R.O.L.) interlocal Page 94 of 118 CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON, AUTHORIZING THE MAYOR AND CITY CLERK TO ENTER INTO AN INTERLOCAL AGREEMENT WITH PUBLIC HOSPITAL DISTRICT NO. 1 OF KING COUNTY, D/B/A/ VALLEY MEDICAL CENTER OCCUPATION HEALTH SERVICES, REGARDING ANNUAL WELLNESS EXAMINATIONS AND APPROPRIATE AND RELATED MEDICAL AND LABORATORY TESTING FOR THE CITY OF RENTON'S FIREFIGHTERS. WHEREAS, the City of Renton currently operates and maintains its own Fire and Emergency Medical Services Department to provide comprehensive fire suppression, emergency medical services, and other services incidental to the protection of persons and property in Renton; and WHEREAS, due to the strenuous nature and physical rigors of fire suppression and providing emergency medical services to persons and property, Renton wishes to obtain annual Wellness Examinations for its firefighters and appropriate and related medical and laboratory testing connected therewith; and WHEREAS, Public Hospital District No. 1 of King County, d/b/a Valley Medical Center Occupation Health Services (hereinafter "VMCOHS") provides its own highly professional medical and health care staff to perform Wellness Examinations and to perform related medical and laboratory testing in conjunction therewith; and WHEREAS, Renton and VMCOHS agree that VMCOHS is in the best position to provide Wellness Examinations and related medical and laboratory testing to Renton's firefighters; and 10a. ‐ Valley Medical Center Occupational Health Services interlocal  agreement (See 8.h.)Page 95 of 118 RESOLUTION NO. WHEREAS, it is necessary to document the terms and conditions under which VMCOHS provides Wellness Examinations and related medical and laboratory testing to Renton's firefighters; NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON, DOES RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS: SECTION I. The above recitals are found to be true and correct in all respects. SECTION II. The Mayor and City Clerk are hereby authorized to enter into an interlocal agreement with VMCOHS entitled Interlocal Agreement Between the City of Renton and Public Hospital District No. 1 of King County, d/b/a Valley Medical Center Occupation Health Services. PASSED BY THE CITY COUNCIL this day of. _, 2010. Bonnie I. Walton, City Clerk APPROVED BY THE MAYOR this day of. _, 2010. Approved as to form: Lawrence J. Warren, City Attorney Denis Law, Mayor RES.1459:5/24/10:scr 10a. ‐ Valley Medical Center Occupational Health Services interlocal  agreement (See 8.h.)Page 96 of 118 CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON, AUTHORIZING THE MAYOR AND CITY CLERK TO ENTER INTO AN INTERLOCAL COOPERATIVE AGREEMENT BETWEEN AUBURN, BEAUX ARTS VILLAGE, BONNIE LAKE, BURIEN, COVINGTON, DES MOINES, FEDERAL WAY, KENT, MAPLE VALLEY, NEWCASTLE, PACIFIC, RENTON, SEATAC, SUMNER, TUKWILA, THE MUCKLESHOOT INDIAN RESERVATION, THE KING COUNTY SHERRIFF'S OFFICE AND THE PORT OF SEATTLE FOR THE CREATION OF THE PATROL AUTO THEFT TASK FORCE. WHEREAS, political subdivisions of the state are authorized by the Interlocal Cooperation Act, RCW 39.34, to enter into interlocal agreements; and WHEREAS, the Mutual Aid Peace Officers Powers Act, RCW 10.93, allows for the provision of mutual aid by and between law enforcement agencies; and WHEREAS, municipalities within the Puget Sound area have experienced increased urbanization and population densities which has resulted in an increase in crimes associated with auto theft; and WHEREAS, the ability to address auto theft and the crimes associated with it has stretched the resources of individual police department investigative units; and WHEREAS, multi-jurisdictional efforts to handle specific and complicated auto theft investigations will result in more effective pooling of personnel, improved utilization of funds, equipment, training, expertise, information sharing, and increased utilization/application of a combined auto theft task force; and WHEREAS, the results of a multi-jurisdictional effort will improve services for all of the jurisdictions, increase safety for the community, and improve auto theft prosecution; and WHEREAS, the municipalities of Auburn, Beaux Arts Village, Bonnie Lake, Burien, Covington, Des Moines, Federal Way, Kent, Maple Valley, Newcastle, Pacific, Renton, Seatac, 1 10b. ‐ Preventing Auto Theft through Regional Operational Links  (P.A.T.R.O.L.) interlocal agreement (See 8.i.)Page 97 of 118 RESOLUTION NO. Sumner, Tukwila, the Muckleshoot Indian Reservation, the King County Sherriff's office, and the Port of Seattle intend to establish and maintain a multi-jurisdictional team, known as the P.A.T.R.O.L. Task Force to handle specific and complicated auto theft investigations; and WHEREAS, it is necessary to document the terms and conditions under which the P.A.T.R.O.L. Task Force will operate; NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON, DOES RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS: SECTION I. The above findings are true and correct in all respects. SECTION II. The Mayor and City Clerk are hereby authorized to enter into an interlocal cooperative agreement to establish and maintain the P.A.T.R.O.L. Task Force. PASSED BY THE CITY COUNCIL this day of , 2010. Bonnie I. Walton, City Clerk APPROVED BY THE MAYOR this day of , 2010. Denis Law, Mayor Approved as to form: Lawrence J. Warren, City Attorney RES.1451:5/7/10:scr 10b. ‐ Preventing Auto Theft through Regional Operational Links  (P.A.T.R.O.L.) interlocal agreement (See 8.i.)Page 98 of 118 CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON, AUTHORIZING THE MAYOR AND CITY CLERK TO ENTER INTO AN INTERLOCAL AGREEMENT WITH KING COUNTY FIRE DISTRICT 37 REGARDING FIRE AND EMERGENCY MEDICAL SERVICES FOR A PORTION OF THE FAIRWOOD ANNEXATION AREA WHICH CURRENTLY LIES IN KING COUNTY FIRE DISTRICT 37'S TERRITORY. WHEREAS, the City has accepted a petition from area residents to place for election the Fairwood annexation, a portion of which currently lies within the territory of King County Fire District 37 ("the District"). The City will have the statutory responsibility and authority to provide fire protection and emergency services within the area if the annexation is approved by the voters; and WHEREAS, the City has the facilities and personnel necessary to provide fire and emergency medical services to the portion of the Fairwood annexation currently within the District's territory ("Service Area") at response times that at times are slightly higher than those provided by the District. The District serves the Service Area today and is capable of continuing to provide services after the annexation; and WHEREAS, it is necessary to document the terms and conditions under which the District will provide fire and emergency medical services to the Service Area; NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON, DOES RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS: SECTION I. The above recitals are found to be true and correct in all respects. 10c. ‐ Fire Protection District #37 interlocal agreement (See 9.b.) Page 99 of 118 RESOLUTION NO. SECTION II. The Mayor and City Clerk are hereby authorized to enter into an interlocal agreement with King County Fire District 37 entitled Fire and Emergency Medical Services Protection Agreement. PASSED BY THE CITY COUNCIL this day of , 2010. Bonnie I. Walton, City Clerk APPROVED BY THE MAYOR this day of , 2010. Denis Law, Mayor Approved as to form: Lawrence J. Warren, City Attorney RES.1453:5/12/10:scr 10c. ‐ Fire Protection District #37 interlocal agreement (See 9.b.) Page 100 of 118 CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON ORDINANCE NO. AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON, AMENDING TITLE V (FINANCE AND BUSINESS REGULATIONS) OF ORDINANCE NO. 4260 ENTITLED "CODE OF GENERAL ORDINANCES OF THE CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON", BY ADDING A NEW CHAPTER 22, SPECIAL EVENT PERMITS, TO PROVIDE FOR THE ISSUANCE OF PERMITS TO REGULATE SPECIAL EVENTS, AND ESTABLISHING PENALTIES. THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON, DOES ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS: SECTION I. Title V (Finance and Business Regulations) of Ordinance No. 4260 entitled "Code of General Ordinances of the City of Renton, Washington" is hereby amended to add a new chapter 22, Special Event Permits, to read as follows: CHAPTER 22 SPECIAL EVENT PERMITS SECTIO 5-22-1 5-22-2 5-22-3 5-22-4 5-22-5 5-22-6 5-22-7 5-22-8 5-22-9 N: Purpose and Intent Definitions Special Events Committee Permit Required Application Conditions of Approval Appeal Procedure Indemnification Agreement Insurance 5-22-10 Cost Recovery for Special Events 5-22-11 Cleaning and Restoration Deposit 5-22-12 5-22-13 5-22-14 Revocation of Permits Violation-Penalty Savings Clause 10a. ‐ Special events permits (See 9.a.) Page 101 of 118 ORDINANCE NO. 5-22-1 PURPOSE AND INTENT: A. To provide for the issuance of special event permits to regulate events on the public streets and public property of the Citv, and private property where the event has potential to substantially impact traffic or public services; and B^ To provide for fees, charges, and procedures in order to recoup costs associated with the event and administration of the permit process. 5-22-2 DEFINITIONS: APPLICANT: The authorized agent of the organizer who completes the application and acts as primary contact for the special event. EVENT PARTICIPANT: A person in attendance at an event, including spectators, vendors, event staff, and Citv staff. PARADE: Any organized group marching or in a procession, whether on foot, animal, or vehicle. PERMIT: Written governmental permission issued by an authorized official, empowering the holder thereof to do some act not forbidden by law but not allowed without such authorization. PRIVATE EVENT: An event which uses public property or the public right-of- way for the purpose of monetary or personal gain by any person, partnership, group, organization, company, or corporation or which is closed to the general public or on private property where the event has potential to substantially impact traffic or public services. 10a. ‐ Special events permits (See 9.a.) Page 102 of 118 ORDINANCE NO. PUBLIC EVENT: An event which is open to the public and does not meet the definition of private event. SPECIAL EVENT: Any function or gathering that is to be conducted on public property, on public right-of-ways, or on private property that will generate or invite considerable public participation and/or spectators, and mav have an impact on transportation, public services or public safety, for a particular and limited purpose and time. Including but not limited to: A^ Fun runs, roadway foot races, fundraising walks, auctions, bike-a-thons, car shows, parades, carnivals, shows or exhibitions, filming/movies, circuses, block parties, and fairs. B^ Planned events in a park or other public place if the event use requires or organizer requests the Citv to provide any public services in addition to those that would normally be provided in the absence of the event. C Any event held on private property that would have a direct substantial impact on traffic congestion or traffic flow to and from the event over public streets or right-of-ways near the event, or that would substantially impact the need for City-provided emergency services such as police, fire, or medical aid. LX Events on private property involving an open invitation to the public to attend or events where the attendance is by private invitation and is expected to have occupant load exceeding three hundred (300) in a location that does not have a place of assembly permit and is presumed to be an event that will have a 10a. ‐ Special events permits (See 9.a.) Page 103 of 118 ORDINANCE NO. direct substantial impact on the public streets, right-of-ways or emergency services. E. Events involving political or religious activity intended primarily for the communication or expression of ideas. SUBSTANTIAL IMPACT: An outcome indicated when an event would preclude in whole or in significant part the public's normal and customary use of a park, public place, public sidewalk, driveway or roadway. SUBSTANTIAL PUBLIC SERVICES: A material increase in the amount, scope or level of necessary fire, police, traffic control, crowd control, or other public resources above those that would normally be required without the event. With respect to police resources, "substantial public services" means resources for crowd management or traffic control required for the event. It also includes instances where Fire and Emergency Services Department personnel are impacted by the volume of participants, or when environmental conditions are such that the impact to the crowds would be anticipated and that these conditions would reduce the effectiveness of on duty personnel requiring the recall of sufficient personnel to assist the participants as well as maintaining the required level of service to the City. USE: To construct, erect, or maintain in, on, over or under any street, right- of-way, park or other public place, building, structure, sign, equipment or scaffolding, or to alter any public right-of-way by painting, spraying or writing on the surface thereof, or to otherwise occupy in such a manner as to obstruct the 10a. ‐ Special events permits (See 9.a.) Page 104 of 118 ORDINANCE NO. normal public use of any public street, right-of-way, park or other public place within the Citv, including a use related to special events. 5-22-3 SPECIAL EVENTS COMMITTEE: A. The Special Events Committee mav consist of representatives from Citv departments and/or other agencies and be under the lead of the Community Services Department Administrator or designee. iL The Special Events Committee is responsible for: L Determining whether an event requires a special event permit pursuant to the guidelines established in this chapter. 2. Establishing terms and conditions and appropriate fees. 3. Approving, approving with conditions or denying the permits. 4. Granting or granting with conditions, an exemption to the noise level regulations set forth in RMC 8-7 if the Committee determines that the special event is an event open to the general public and that the use of sound amplification equipment will not endanger the public's health, safety or property. 5. Granting, or granting with conditions, an exemption to any of the business license regulations set forth in RMC 5-5 if the Committee determines that any of the activities associated with and sponsored by the special event are in conformance with all other applicable Citv regulations related to zoning, safety and property. 10a. ‐ Special events permits (See 9.a.) Page 105 of 118 ORDINANCE NO. 5-22-4 PERMIT REQUIRED: A. A special event permit is required for any special event as defined in this chapter. Either a special event permit or authorization shall be required in addition to any street or park use permit, or other regular permits as mav be required by ordinance. B. Exemptions: A special event permit is not required for the following: 1. Parades, athletic events, or other special events that occur exclusively on City property and are conducted in full by the Citv of Renton. 2. Park facility rentals meeting rental requirements. 3. Funeral procession by a licensed mortuary. 4. Gatherings of fifty (50) or fewer people in a Citv park, unless merchandise or services are offered for sale or trade. 5. Temporary and seasonal sales conducted by businesses, such as holiday sales, grand opening sales, or anniversary sales. 6. Garage sales and rummage sales. 7. Dances and other special events conducted by schools or churches when held on their property. 8. The Community Services Department Administrator or designee mav authorize other exemptions where the proposed event meets the purpose and intent of this chapter without requiring additional project conditions or charges. 10a. ‐ Special events permits (See 9.a.) Page 106 of 118 ORDINANCE NO. Such exemptions may include minor events with limited or no impacts to traffic or public services, such as small filming events. 5-22-5 APPLICATION: A. Applications for a special event permit must be filed with the City at least ninety (90) days prior to the date(s) on which the event is to occur. B^ When a special event permit is required, the Special Events Committee shall advise the organizer of all other Citv permits that appear to be required for the event based on information contained in the application and assist the organizer in contacting other departments to apply for all other permits in a timely manner. C. Complete Applications - Form and Content: The Community Services Department shall prescribe the form and content for complete applications made pursuant to this chapter. The requirements shall be made available to the public in a form that clearly explains what material must be submitted for an application to be considered complete. Certain submittal requirements mav be waived by the Administrator or designee, if the applicant can demonstrate that normally required information is not relevant to the proposed action and is not required to show that an application complies with applicable City codes and regulations. P^ Waiver of Application Deadline: Upon a showing of good cause or at the discretion of the Special Events Committee, the Committee shall consider an application that is filed after the filing deadline if there is sufficient time to 10a. ‐ Special events permits (See 9.a.) Page 107 of 118 ORDINANCE NO. process and investigate the application and obtain police and other City services for the event. Good cause can be demonstrated by the applicant showing that the circumstance that gave rise to the permit application did not reasonably allow the participants to file within the time prescribed, and/or the event is for the purpose of exercising rights under the First and/or Fourteenth Amendments of the United States Constitution. E. Date of Special Event Not Confirmed Until Notice of Confirmation Issued: Notwithstanding the acceptance of a completed application, the date of the event shall not be considered confirmed until the Special Event Committee issues a written notice of confirmation or a special event permit. F. Decision Criteria - Approval or Approval With Conditions: The Citv mav approve or approve with conditions the special event permit based on consideration of any one or any combination of the following factors: L The special event will not be materially detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare nor injurious to property or improvements in the vicinity of the special event; or 2. Adequate parking facilities and vehicle ingress, and egress will be provided to serve the special event and any existing uses on the site; or 3. Hours of operation of the special event are specified, and will not adversely impact surrounding uses: or 4^ The special event will not cause noise, light, or glare that would materially impact surrounding uses; or 10a. ‐ Special events permits (See 9.a.) Page 108 of 118 ORDINANCE NO. 5. The applicant has obtained all other applicable permits, including required right-of-way use permits. G. Decision Criteria - Denial: The Citv mav deny the special event permit based on consideration of any one or any combination of the following factors: L The applicant provides materially false or misleading information, fails to complete the application or to supply other required information or documents: or 2. The applicant is unable to comply with the requisite terms and conditions to obtain the permit: or 3. The proposed event conflicts with another previously scheduled event or condition: or 4. The proposed event would unreasonably disrupt the orderly or safe circulation of traffic or would present an unreasonable risk of injury or damage to the public or property. 5-22-6 CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL: A^ The Special Events Committee mav include as part of the special event permit, among other provisions, reasonable requirements concerning the time, place and manner of the event, and such requirements as are necessary to protect the safety and rights of persons and property and provide for the control of traffic. Conditions shall be based upon projected impacts on public safety, public places and public services, but shall not be based upon the programming 10a. ‐ Special events permits (See 9.a.) Page 109 of 118 ORDINANCE NO. content of the event or message that the proposed event mav convey or any other valid expression of rights under the First and Fourteenth Amendments. iL The following types of conditions apply to all special event permits: L Conditions concerning the time, place, and manner of the event proposed on the event application, including provisions for extensions of the permit: and 2. Conditions concerning the area of assembly and disbanding of an event; and 3. Conditions concerning accommodation of pedestrian or vehicular traffic, including restricting the event to only a portion of the street or rights-of- way. C Other conditions that may apply to special event permits include, but are not limited to: L Compliance with Citv traffic control plans and requirements for the use and rental of traffic cones, barricades, flaggers, or other requirements as identified. 2. Compliance with health and sanitary regulations. 3. Plan for emergency treatment and evacuation of people who mav need such services, emergency communication, compliance with fire regulations concerning fire suppression equipment within structures and maintenance of unobstructed emergency passageways. 10 10a. ‐ Special events permits (See 9.a.) Page 110 of 118 ORDINANCE NO. 4. Requirements for use of event monitors and providing notice of permit conditions to event participants. 5. Restrictions on the number and types of vehicles, animals or structures at the event. 6. Inspection and approval of floats, structures, and decorated vehicles for fire safety. 7. Requirements related to animal protection. 8. Requirements for use of separate garbage and recycling containers, cleanup, and restoration of Citv property. 9. Restrictions on the use of amplified sound and compliance with noise ordinances, regulations and laws. 10. Notice to residents and/or businesses regarding any activity that would require a whole or partial street closure, including single-lane closures. 11. Restrictions on the sale and/or consumption of alcohol. 12. Elimination of an activity that cannot be mitigated to ensure public safety and welfare, or that causes property damage or undue liability to the City. 13. Requirements regarding the use of Citv personnel and equipment. 14. Requirement for provision of a plan for parking, car pooling, or use of public transportation. 11 10a. ‐ Special events permits (See 9.a.) Page 111 of 118 ORDINANCE NO. 5-22-7 APPEAL PROCEDURE: A. An applicant mav appeal the denial of a permit or any permit condition, by filing a written notice of appeal, accompanied by a fee of two hundred fifty dollars ($250) to the Citv Clerk within fourteen (14) days of the decision. ii The notice of appeal shall specify the grounds for the appeal and applicant mav attach any relevant documents in support of the appeal. C. An appeal under this Chapter shall be conducted by the Community Services Department Administrator or designee, who will issue a written decision regarding the appeal within ten (10) days. D. The Administrator's decision mav then be appealed to the Citv of Renton's Chief Administrative Officer or designee. No new or additional evidence or testimony shall be accepted by the Chief Administrative Officer in this appeal. The Chief Administrative Officer shall give substantial weight to the decision made by the Community Services Department Administrator or designee. 5-22-8 INDEMNIFICATION AGREEMENT: Prior to the issuance of a special event permit, the Citv shall require the Applicant to execute a hold harmless and indemnity agreement and any other necessary waivers with the City. Applicant must further agree to reimburse the Citv for any costs incurred by it to repair damage to Citv property caused by Applicant's special event. 12 10a. ‐ Special events permits (See 9.a.) Page 112 of 118 ORDINANCE NO. 5-22-9 INSURANCE: A. The following insurance shall be required in connection with the issuance of a permit for a special event: one million dollars ($1,000,000) commercial general liability insurance per occurrence: combined single limits. Two million dollars ($2,000,000) aggregate, unless waived or modified by the City. B^ The Citv Risk Manager is authorized and directed to require written proof of such insurance prior to permit issuance. The insurance policy shall be written on an occurrence basis, shall name the City as an additional insured on a non- contributory primary basis, shall be written for a period not less than twenty- four (24) hours prior to the event and extending for a period not less than twenty-four (24) hours following the completion of the event. C. The Citv reserves the right to require other forms of insurance in addition to the commercial general liability, if the Citv Risk Manager determines that such additional form of insurance is necessary for the particular type of event. 5-22-10 COST RECOVERY FOR SPECIAL EVENTS: A^ A Special Event Application fee of fifty dollars ($50) per event is to be paid to the Citv of Renton at the time of application. This fee mav be waived if the applicant can show that the proposed event is in accordance with exercising rights under the First and/or Fourteenth Amendments of the United States Constitution. 13 10a. ‐ Special events permits (See 9.a.) Page 113 of 118 ORDINANCE NO. JL Prior to the issuance of the special event permit the applicant will be provided an estimate for the cost of any necessary Citv personnel and/or equipment- City services and equipment mav include the use of police officers and public employees for traffic and crowd control, police, extraordinary street sweeping, and any other needed, requested or required citv service and the cost of operating the equipment to provide such services. These fees mav be in addition to other permit fees that mav be required. A special event permit will be issued when all fees have been paid and other permit obligations have been met unless otherwise provided in the conditions of approval. C If the actual cost for Citv services and equipment on the date(s) of the event is less than the estimated cost, the applicant will be refunded the difference by the Citv in a timely manner. If the actual cost for Citv services and equipment on the date(s) of the event is greater than the estimated cost, the applicant will be billed for the difference. 5-22-11 CLEANING AND RESTORATION DEPOSIT: The applicant mav be required to provide a cleaning and restoration deposit prior to the issuance of a special event permit. The cleaning and restoration deposit will be refunded after the event if the area used for the permitted event has been cleaned and restored to the same condition as existed prior to the event. 14 10a. ‐ Special events permits (See 9.a.) Page 114 of 118 ORDINANCE NO. If the property used for the event has not been properly cleaned or restored, the applicant shall be billed for the actual cost by the City for cleaning and restoration. The cleaning and restoration deposit shall be applied toward the payment of the City's actual cost for cleaning and restoration. 5-22-12 REVOCATION OF PERMITS: Any permit issued under this ordinance mav be revoked by the Citv at any time if, by reason of disaster, public calamity, riot or other emergency or exigent circumstances, the Citv determines the safety of the public or property requires such immediate revocation. The Citv mav also revoke any permit issued pursuant to this ordinance if the Special Event Committee finds that the permit has been issued based upon materially false information or if the event exceeds the scope of the permit or fails to comply with any condition of the permit. 5-22-13 VIOLATION - PENALTY: Failure to abide by any and all requisite conditions set forth in this chapter shall be an infraction subject to penalties and conditions of RMC 1-3-2. 5-22-14 SAVINGS CLAUSE: If any part or portion of this chapter is for any reason held to be invalid or unconstitutional by any court of competent jurisdiction, such decision shall not affect the validity of the remaining portions of this chapter. SECTION II. This ordinance shall be effective upon its passage, approval, and thirty (30) days after publication. 15 10a. ‐ Special events permits (See 9.a.) Page 115 of 118 ORDINANCE NO. PASSED BY THE CITY COUNCIL this day of , 2010. Approved as to form: Lawrence J. Warren, City Attorney Date of Publication: ORD:1628:5/18/10:scr Bonnie I. Walton, City Clerk APPROVED BY THE MAYOR this day of , 2010. Denis Law, Mayor 16 10a. ‐ Special events permits (See 9.a.) Page 116 of 118 CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON ORDINANCE NO. AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON, AMENDING SUBSECTION 4-1-180D, PUBLIC WORKS CONSTRUCTION PERMIT FEES, OF CHAPTER 1, ADMINISTRATION AND ENFORCEMENT, OF TITLE IV (DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS) OF ORDINANCE NO. 4260 ENTITLED "CODE OF GENERAL ORDINANCES OF THE CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON", BY ADDING A NEW SUBSECTION 4-1-180D.4, ENTITLED "HYDRANT METER FEES", AND RENUMBERING THE CURRENT SUBSECTIONS 4-1-180D.4 THROUGH 4-1- 180D.6. THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON, DOES ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS: SECTION I. Subsection 4-1-180D, Public Works Construction Permit Fees, of Title IV (Development Regulations) of Ordinance No. 4260 entitled "Code of General Ordinances of the City of Renton, Washington", is hereby amended to add a new subsection 4-1-180D.4, to read as shown below. The current subsections 4-1-180D.4 through 4-1-180D.6 shall be renumbered accordingly. 4. HYDRANT METER FEES: The following fees are payable at the time of application for a hydrant meter- Fees for hydrant meters: Hydrant Meter Permit Fee Deposit %" Meter and Backflow Prevention Assembly 3" Meter and Backflow Prevention Assembly Deposit processing charge (nonrefundable) Cost of Water Meter Rental 3A" Meter and Backflow Prevention Assemblv 3" Meter and Backflow Prevention Assemblv $50 per meter application $300.00 $800.00 $25.00 $3.70 Der CCF Starts on dav of pickup $11.66/month ($0.39/dav) $143.67/month ($4.79/dav) 10b. ‐ Hydrant meter fees (See 9.c.) Page 117 of 118 ORDINANCE NO. SECTION II. This ordinance shall be effective upon its passage, approval, and thirty (30) days after publication. PASSED BY THE CITY COUNCIL this day of , 2010. Bonnie I. Walton, City Clerk APPROVED BY THE MAYOR this day of , 2010. Approved as to form: Lawrence J. Warren, City Attorney Date of Publication: ORD:1631:4/22/10:scr Denis Law, Mayor 10b. ‐ Hydrant meter fees (See 9.c.) Page 118 of 118