No preview available
HomeMy WebLinkAboutCouncil 11/15/2010AGENDA  RENTON CITY COUNCIL    REGULAR MEETING  November 15, 2010  Monday, 7 p.m.  1.CALL TO ORDER AND PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE 2.ROLL CALL 3.SPECIAL PRESENTATION a. Renton FilmFrenzy III & Renton Reporter People's Choice Award  4.ADMINISTRATIVE REPORT 5.AUDIENCE COMMENT (Speakers must sign up prior to the Council meeting.  Each speaker is allowed five minutes.  The  comment period will be limited to one‐half hour.  The second audience comment period later on in  the agenda is unlimited in duration.)  When you are recognized by the Presiding Officer, please  walk to the podium and state your name and city of residence for the record, SPELLING YOUR LAST  NAME. 6.CONSENT AGENDA The following items are distributed to Councilmembers in advance for study and review, and the  recommended actions will be accepted in a single motion.  Any item may be removed for further  discussion if requested by a Councilmember.  a. Approval of Council meeting minutes of 11/8/2010.  Council concur.  b. Community and Economic Development Department recommends approval of the 2011 State  Legislative Agenda and Statement of Policy Positions, which serve as guidance for City staff  during the State legislative session.  Refer to Committee of the Whole.  c. Finance  and  Information  Technology Department  reports request  from  RVA  Center,  LLC for  utility bill adjustment and recommends granting the adjustment in the amount of $4,720.32.   Refer to Finance Committee.  d. Finance  and  Information  Technology Department  recommends approval  of  a  2010 budget  amendment  ordinance  increasing  the  budget  by $4,852,225  for  a  final amended  total of  $262,396,683.  Refer to Finance Committee.  7.UNFINISHED BUSINESS Topics listed below were discussed in Council committees during the past week.  Those topics  marked with an asterisk (*) may include legislation.  Committee reports on any topics may be held  by the Chair if further review is necessary. a. Committee of the Whole:  Jail Facilities Lease with SCORE*  b. Community Services Committee:  Criminal Violations of Park Rules & Regulations Revisions*  c. Finance Committee:  Landscape Maintenance Contract with Canber Corporation  Page 1 of 195 d. Transportation  (Aviation)  Committee:   Taxiway  Bravo  Rehabilitation  Contract  with  Reid  Middleton; Assignment of Pro‐Flight Aviation, Inc.'s Lease; Operating Permit with Pro‐Flight  Aviation, Inc. & Sublease  8.RESOLUTIONS AND ORDINANCES Resolutions: a. Adopting the 2011/2012 Fee Schedule Brochure (Approved via 11/1/2010 Committee of  the Whole report)  b. Jail Facilities Lease with SCORE (See 7.a.)  Ordinances for first reading: a. Criminal violations of Park Rules & Regulations (See 7.b.)  b. Establishing property tax levy rate for 2011 (Approved via 11/1/2010 Committee of the  Whole report)  c. Increasing water utilities tax (Approved via 11/1/2010 Committee of the Whole report)  d. 2011/2012  City  of  Renton  biennial  budget  (Approved  via  11/1/2010  Committee  of  the  Whole report)  Ordinances for second and final reading: a. Temporary Homeless Encampments & Temporary Use Permits Code Amendments ‐ Title IV  Docket #D‐09 & #D‐37 (1st reading 11/8/2010)  b. Planned Urban Development Regulations Code Amendment ‐ Title IV Docket #D‐38 (1st  reading 11/8/2010)  c. Urban  Design  Regulations  Code  Amendment ‐  Title  IV  Docket  #D‐39  (1st  reading  11/8/2010)  d. Density  Bonuses  in  Multi‐Family  Zone  Code  Amendment ‐  Title  IV  Docket  #D‐40  (1st  reading 11/8/2010)  e. Office  in  the  Industrial  Light  (IL)  Zone  Code  Amendment ‐  Title  IV  Docket  #D‐41  (1st  reading 11/8/2010)  f. Mobile Homes Setbacks Code Amendment ‐ Title IV Docket #D‐42 (1st reading 11/8/2010)  g. Definition of Building Height & Grade Plane Code Amendments ‐ Title IV Docket #D‐43  (1st reading 11/8/2010)  h. Crisis Diversion Interim Service Facilities Code Amendment ‐ Title IV Docket #D‐45 (1st  reading 11/8/2010)  i. Administrative Policy/Code Interpretation Code Amendment ‐ Title IV Docket #D‐46 (1st  reading 11/8/2010)  j. Comprehensive Plan Amendments Timeline Code Amendment ‐ Title IV Docket #D‐48 (1st  reading 11/8/2010)  9.NEW BUSINESS (Includes Council Committee agenda topics; call 425‐430‐6512 for recorded information.) 10.AUDIENCE COMMENT 11.EXECUTIVE SESSION (property acquisition & labor relations) Page 2 of 195 12.ADJOURNMENT COMMITTEE OF THE WHOLE AGENDA   (Preceding Council Meeting)     COUNCIL CHAMBERS   November 15, 2010  Monday, 6:00 p.m.     South Correctional Entity (SCORE) Transition & Lease Agreement;   Federal Relations Update    • Hearing assistance devices for use in the Council Chambers are available upon request to the City Clerk •     CITY COUNCIL MEETINGS ARE TELEVISED LIVE ON GOVERNMENT ACCESS CHANNEL 21 AND ARE RECABLECAST:  Tues. & Thurs. at 11 AM & 9 PM, Wed. & Fri at 9 AM & 7 PM and Sat. & Sun. at 1 PM & 9 PM  Page 3 of 195 CITY OF RENTON COUNCIL AGENDA BILL Subject/Title: 2011 State Legislative Agenda and Statement of Policy Positions Meeting: Regular Council - 15 Nov 2010 Exhibits: 2011 State Legislative Agenda 2011 Statement of Policy Positions Submitting Data: Dept/Div/Board: Community and Economic Development Staff Contact: Suzanne Dale Estey (x6591) Recommended Action: Refer to the Committee of the Whole Fiscal Impact: Expenditure Required: $ N/A Transfer Amendment: $ Amount Budgeted: $ N/A Revenue Generated: $ Total Project Budget: $ City Share Total Project: $ SUMMARY OF ACTION: Prior to each state legislative session, the City Council considers documents which summarize the City’s positions on state issues. The State Legislative Agenda and Statement of Policy Positions serve as guidance for City staff as it attempts to work with the Legislature to achieve the City’s goals. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Adopt the 2011 State Legislative Agenda and Statement of Policy Positions as proposed. 6b. ‐ Community and Economic Development Department  recommends approval of the 2011 State Legislative Agenda and  Page 4 of 195 DRAFT DRAFT 6b. ‐ Community and Economic Development Department  recommends approval of the 2011 State Legislative Agenda and  Page 5 of 195 DRAFT DRAFT City of Renton 2011 State Legislative Agenda BASIC PREMISES The City of Renton’s positions on state legislation will reflect basic premises established by the Renton City Council over many years. These include the need for proposed legislation to provide local elected officials maximum flexibility in addressing community needs; strong opposition to new or expanded mandates on local governments without adequate funding to support these programs, as required by State law (RCW 43.135.060); and the importance of maintaining local control, especially in areas such as local government taxation and financing, rights-of-way management and land use and zoning matters. Additionally, during a time of economic uncertainty, and with the State facing operating budget shortfalls for 2011-2013 of $4.8 billion or more, Renton asks lawmakers to maintain basic services such as public safety and criminal justice, and the City is not making any new funding requests from the State’s operating budget. The City urges lawmakers to refrain from further cuts to programs that are key to public safety, including auto theft prevention grants, municipal criminal justice monies and law enforcement academy funding. Renton also asks the Legislature to consider creative approaches to providing cities with additional efficiencies, cost-savings and flexibility. Renton will consider support for regulatory reform, easing liability burdens and legislation to reduce or eliminate unnecessary mandates. PRIORITY ISSUES Transportation Solutions Renton continues to face major challenges with traffic congestion that comes with being at the crossroads of Interstate 405, Highway 167 and several other state highway corridors. This creates slowdowns and choke points that stifle the efficient movement of people and goods through the City, resulting in severe economic, family and quality of life impacts. Transportation projects are infrastructure investments that can be economic stimulus and job creation tools to help areas further recover economically. The City asks legislators to remember that the I-405/SR 167 interchange remains the most congested interchange in the state and I-405 from Renton to Bellevue remains the most congested corridor in the state. Renton is joining the multi-stakeholder “Transportation Partnership” in the 2011 session to urge that the Legislature enact a new transportation investment package. The City requests that the core mission of “fixing the worst first” help guide investment decisions, and that a package should address not only the state highway system but key needs such as local roadways, freight mobility, transit and incentive-driven programs such as Commute Trip Reduction (CTR). In the 2011 Legislative Session, the City of Renton will: ·Support authorization of “managed lane” or “HOT lane” approaches to funding I-405 needs from Puyallup to Lynnwood: The City played a key role in 2010 in helping with House passage and Senate committee passage of ESHB 2941, which would have established a managed lanes program on I-405. While ESHB 2941 did not pass, the Legislature appropriated funds that allowed the Washington State Department of Transportation (WSDOT) to move forward with environmental work, continued design, and “Expert Review Panel” analysis of a I-405 “High Occupancy Toll” lane (HOT Lane) project. In 2011, WSDOT will forward agency request legislation to call for construction of additional toll lanes or managed lanes that can help add desperately-needed capacity to the I-405 corridor. While the first deployment of HOT lanes is likely to be north of Bellevue, Renton seeks capacity additions and improvements as soon as possible at the I-405/SR-167 connector, as well as the two lanes of additional capacity on I-405 northbound and southbound between Renton and Bellevue. The City also encourages the State to use its full faith and credit to help finance I-405 projects in order to maximize the investments and accelerate progress on the entire corridor. ·Investments in key state and local projects, freight mobility and transit: As the Legislature and the Transportation Partnership lay the groundwork for a possible comprehensive transportation revenue package in 2011, Renton asks lawmakers to support key needs, including: o $3 million for the NE Sunset Boulevard Corridor Improvements Project (SR-900) o Dedicated freight mobility funding that would allow the Freight Mobility Strategic Investment Board (FMSIB) to award $5 million for the SW 27th Street/Strander Boulevard project between Renton and Tukwila o Direct distribution funds for local needs, local funding options, enhanced funding for the Transportation Improvement Board (TIB) grant programs and additional funding for transit and Commute Trip Reduction o “Complete streets” legislation that better enables cities such as Renton to make transit- and pedestrian-friendly investments along state corridors that run through local communities. 6b. ‐ Community and Economic Development Department  recommends approval of the 2011 State Legislative Agenda and  Page 6 of 195 DRAFT DRAFT City of Renton 2011 State Legislative Agenda Fiscal Stability Renton, like many other cities around the state, has been forced make major budget reductions during the economic recession while still keeping core services intact. Through several cycles of cuts, the City has reduced its general fund spending by more than 12% over two years, instituted furlough days for employees, and reduced its work force by 94 employees to balance its 2009-2012 budgets, despite growing its population by one-third since 2008. With these major fiscal challenges in mind, Renton asks for the State Legislature’s help to preserve key state revenue sources and current taxing authorities. In the 2011 Session, the City of Renton will: ·Team up with the Association of Washington Cities (AWC), counties and other local governments to protect state-shared revenues that are vital to cities: With a $4 billion-plus state operating budget shortfall, some state-to-local revenue streams may be at risk. Renton asks legislators to consider how counter-productive it would be to cut local revenues that help cities maintain a commitment to public safety and assist with social services needs. Municipal Criminal Justice Assistance funds, Streamlined Sales Tax (SST) mitigation payments, auto theft and sex offender address verification funds, and other state-shared revenues, are critical to cities such as Renton. In 2011, Renton will work closely with AWC and others to protect these vital state-shared revenues. Flood Control and Critical Upgrades to the Green River Levee System Over the past two years, Renton and other cities in the Green River Valley, along with King County, and in cooperation with multiple state and federal agencies, have made significant progress in repairing and stabilizing the Howard Hanson Dam to ease fears over flood damage that could have occurred with major winter storms. However, while the progress with the Howard Hanson Dam is encouraging, by no means are the Valley’s problems solved. It remains critical to have the flood-protection levees along the Green River certified and accredited. Without such certification, the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) will map virtually the entire Valley as a flood zone, causing flood insurance costs to skyrocket, crippling economic development efforts and making it infinitely more difficult for businesses and property owners to develop and redevelop in the Valley. However, upgrading the nearly 20 miles of levees along the Green River Valley will be a lengthy, expensive process costing several hundred million dollars. Federal dollars for such levee work are scarce, and funding and utility and property tax rate-based efforts at the local level and with the King County Flood Control Zone District are not nearly enough to address the problem. It is of paramount importance that the State of Washington assists with this work. The Green River Valley is the largest industrial area in Washington State, the 2nd largest distribution hub on the West Coast and the 4th largest in the nation. Funding of these flood-related projects is critical to the health of an industrial valley that supports 40 million square feet of warehouse/industrial space, 1,800 businesses, 20,000 jobs and $8 billion in taxable revenue. In the 2011 Session, the City of Renton will: ·Strongly support a 2011-13 Capital Budget request for state assistance with levee upgrades: As part of an overall 10-year, $15-million-per-year request by Valley cities and King County, Renton will support a 2011-13 capital budget request for $30 million to upgrade levee segments in Kent, Tukwila and Auburn, particularly those segments which directly assist with protecting the City against flood impacts (there are no Green River Valley levee segments physically located within Renton). ·Work with King County and the King County Flood Control Zone District to resolve the “levy suppression” problem that threatens the District’s annual funding: As the most junior taxing district in King County, the Flood Control Zone District’s funding for 2011 and beyond is threatened by the “levy suppression” problem. The economic downturn and a corresponding rapid decrease in assessed values have caused property tax levy rates to have to be adjusted upward. This is resulting in King County coming close to bumping up against a statutory $5.90 per $1000 limit in the combined property tax rate allowed for all taxing districts (cities, County, hospital/library/fire districts). In 2011, pending review of proposed legislation, Renton will support a King County/Flood District-led effort to secure a temporary waiver or exemption from the $5.90/$1000 statutory cap and allow the Flood District to maintain at least some of the $35 million in annual funds it generates for levee maintenance. Economic Development and Infrastructure Funding Investing in infrastructure that addresses core community needs, and lays the groundwork for economic development, continues to be a high priority for the City of Renton. Renton will work in concert with the Association of Washington Cities 6b. ‐ Community and Economic Development Department  recommends approval of the 2011 State Legislative Agenda and  Page 7 of 195 DRAFT DRAFT City of Renton 2011 State Legislative Agenda and a coalition of other key stakeholders on options to address community needs and enhance its business retention and recruitment efforts. In the 2011 Legislative Session, the City of Renton will seek support for: ·Sunset Area Community Investment and Revitalization: The City Council has adopted a Sunset Area Community Investment Strategy, developed with the Renton Housing Authority (RHA), the Renton School District (RSD) and the community to revitalize this area. The City has set aside $1.5 million for infrastructure needs in the area and is dedicated to working with RHA, RSD and others to secure additional funding to revitalize the area. Potential strategies include the use of underutilized land, redevelopment of existing public housing, upgrade of public infrastructure, improvement of pedestrian linkages and enhancement of community services and amenities. The City of Renton strongly supports RHA’s pursuit of $4.5 million in state “Washington Works” workforce housing (Housing Finance Commission) for the Sunset Terrace redevelopment project, which will act as a catalyst for further redevelopment in the Sunset Area. The City also seeks $3 million in transportation funding for safety and pedestrian improvements for the NE Sunset Boulevard Corridor Improvements Project (SR-900) and $1 million for an accessible playground in this community. ·Assistance with revitalization of the West Hill/Skyway area: In August 2010, the Renton City Council voted to place on the February 2012 ballot the annexation of the West Hill/Skyway area between Renton and Seattle. The City is tremendously appreciative of the help the Legislature has provided to assist with the Growth Management Act-driven costs of taking on large annexation areas such as this one, through a state sales tax credit mechanism enacted in 2006 and extended and enhanced in 2009. Still, for areas such as West Hill/Skyway that are struggling with business closures, dealing with severe public safety and educational challenges, and suffering from deficient infrastructure, a gap of several million dollars per year must be closed in order for Renton to proceed with annexation efforts during a time of economic upheaval. In 2011, in collaboration with King County and Skyway Solutions, Renton is supporting a $2 million West Hill/Skyway capital budget request to build upon previous infrastructure investments in the business district along Renton Avenue, This investment will help stimulate economic activity in this struggling commercial area, help close the City’s funding gap and begin to help radically revitalize this community. The City also supports legislation which would relieve cities of the requirement to conduct expensive post annexation census counts. Strengthening the Aerospace Industry As the first city to join the Aerospace Futures Alliance (AFA) and as a founding member of the Washington Aerospace Partnership, Renton strongly supports the efforts of both organizations to strengthen the aerospace industry across Washington. Priority issues for AFA include, among others: supporting tax policies that encourage the growth and long-term health of the industry; improving transportation infrastructure; enhancing training and education to support the aerospace workforce; and addressing rapidly increasing health care costs. Renton has been proud to be the home of The Boeing Company for over 67 years. The first commercial jet, the Boeing 707, was made in Renton, and the best selling jets in history have been assembled in Renton ever since. Renton is now home to three of the company’s six business units: Boeing Commercial Airplanes, Boeing Capital and Boeing’s Shared Services Group. Boeing’s Renton operations account for nearly $7 billion (2.7%) of Washington’s Gross State Product, 10.7% of the state’s exports abroad and over 45,000 direct and indirect jobs. Renton is also the home of a diverse array of aerospace suppliers and a municipal airport. The City is delighted by Boeing’s announcement last September that it will step up production of the successful 737 jetliner from the current 31.5 per month (an all-time high for the company) to 38 per month by the second quarter of 2013. Renton will continue to support legislation that enables Boeing and other aerospace companies to thrive. 6b. ‐ Community and Economic Development Department  recommends approval of the 2011 State Legislative Agenda and  Page 8 of 195 DRAFT DRAFT 1 City of Renton 2011 State Legislative Agenda and Statement of Policy Positions The City of Renton’s 2011 State Legislative Agenda and Statement of Policy Positions are divided as follows: 1.The 2011 State Legislative Agenda includes PRIORITY ISSUES – items Renton will devote its highest level of advocacy toward achieving. These are outlined in a separate handout. 2.The 2011 Statement of Policy Positions – SUPPORT/OPPOSE – items Renton considers important. The City will use time and effort and join others in supporting beneficial measures or opposing those which would have an adverse impact. 3.The 2011 Statement of Policy Positions – TRACK/MONITOR – issues the City will track and monitor. As these issues evolve, the City may involve itself to a greater degree if necessary. 6b. ‐ Community and Economic Development Department  recommends approval of the 2011 State Legislative Agenda and  Page 9 of 195 DRAFT DRAFT 2 City of Renton 2011 Statement of Policy Positions Criminal Justice/Courts/Jails/Law Enforcement SUPPORT/OPPOSE ·Anti-Gang-Violence Legislation: Renton will strongly support 2011 anti-gang-violence legislation being requested by the State Attorney General and supported by a coalition of law enforcement, prosecutors, cities and counties. Renton believes that in addition to penalties, intervention and prevention strategies must be an integral component of any 2011 bill addressing gang violence. ·Technical fix to ensure “SCORE” jail employees can be under the Public Safety Employees’ Retirement System (PSERS): Renton will strongly support a 2011 legislative request put forth by the South County Correctional Entity (SCORE), making a technical fix in the law to ensure that SCORE jail employees can participate in PSERS. ·Protect criminal justice, law enforcement and courts funding: Renton will work closely with other local agencies, law enforcement organizations and courts organizations to protect operating budget funding for key criminal justice, law enforcement and courts priorities. These include municipal criminal justice, auto theft prevention, law enforcement academy funding, sex offender address verification, public defense and court interpreters. ·Traffic Safety Cameras – oppose pre-emption of local authority: Cities expect to see legislation in 2011 that would limit the fines a local government may collect as part of any red-light camera program – and could possibly dictate other operational aspects of the programs. Renton’s program has enhanced traffic safety and reduced collisions. Traffic safety cameras have had an enormous impact on reducing the number of vehicles speeding through school zones. Local trends show that the number of violations occurring at locations with speed safety cameras has decreased by 35 percent. High speed violations issued for exceeding the posted speed limit by 16 to 20 mph have dropped by 42 percent. Renton will join others in opposing pre-emption of local authority and work with other jurisdictions on proposing sensible clarifications of existing law. ·Vehicle Prowls – Cracking Down on Repeat Offenders: Renton will support legislation that would increase the penalty for repeat vehicle prowl offenders to a felony. Vehicle prowls are becoming a more significant issue for Renton, particularly given the success the city and others have had in reducing automobile theft. ·Driving While License Suspended: Renton will join other law enforcement interests in opposing any 2011 legislation that would seek to completely decriminalize certain types of Driving While License Suspended (DWLS) offenses such as Failure to Appear and Failure to Pay. ·Funding for medical costs incurred by jail offenders: Renton will support efforts by AWC and others to obtain assistance. TRACK/MONITOR ·Schools mapping: Renton will track efforts by the Washington Association of Sheriffs and Police Chiefs to obtain additional state funding for the mapping of K-12 schools and higher education institutions for 6b. ‐ Community and Economic Development Department  recommends approval of the 2011 State Legislative Agenda and  Page 10 of 195 DRAFT DRAFT 3 emergency preparedness purposes. ·Requiring Municipal Courts to take on Anti-Harassment Orders (AHOs) and Domestic Violence Protection Orders (DVPOs): If legislation arises to turn this local-discretion authority into a requirement for Municipal Courts, Renton will track it. ·Weapons restrictions: Renton will track efforts to enact state restrictions on guns, including safe storage and “closing the gun show loophole.” ·Fees for offenses that require a DNA sample to be taken – extend authority to Municipal and District Courts: Current law requires a DNA sample to be taken in connection with certain criminal offenses. Superior Courts have the authority to impose fees that help with cost-recovery for the DNA samples, while District and Municipal Courts do not. Renton will track efforts by the District and Municipal Court Judges’ Association to level the playing field so that all local courts can have cost recovery for DNA sampling. Economic Development/Infrastructure/Parks & Recreation/Housing/Arts & Culture SUPPORT/MONITOR ·Local Revitalization Financing (LRF) and other Tax-Increment Financing (TIF) types of tools: Renton has been fortunate to successfully compete for matching state funding of two local economic revitalization projects through the LRF program. Absent state legislative action, the LRF program will not be extended. Renton will strongly support efforts to reauthorize LRF or provide other more robust “TIF” tools. ·Local Conservation Financing Tool (LCFT): The City will support efforts by the Cascade Land Conservancy to protect open space and natural areas in King, Pierce and Snohomish counties by creating a Transfer of Development Rights (TDR) program that generates revenues to local cities to fund infrastructure and other public projects. ·Public Works Trust Fund (PWTF): Renton will support efforts by local governments, contractors, water-sewer districts and others to ensure the PWTF can be recapitalized. In 2009, for the first time ever, the Legislature “swept” money out of the PWTF to help resolve a $9 billion Operating Budget shortfall. ·Washington Wildlife, Recreation and Parks Program (WWRP): Renton will strongly support efforts to keep the WWRP program, which is funded out of the State Capital Budget, at a funding level of at least the current $70 million per biennium. The Washington Wildlife and Recreation Coalition (WWRC) will actually request $100 million for the program to take its biennial funding back to the 2007-09 level, but Renton recognizes that will be challenging in this fiscal environment. ·“Healthy & Sustainable Communities” Initiative: Renton’s Community Services Department has been involved in the development of a Healthy & Sustainable Communities initiative among representatives of parks and recreation, Realtors, cities and counties, public health entities, the American Heart Association, the Obesity Coalition, environmental groups and others. The initiative calls for maintained funding of several operating, capital and transportation budget programs such as public health, WWRP, Safe Routes to School that help people stay active and healthy, make more efficient use of the “built environment,” and hopefully help to reverse the obesity epidemic that leads to increased heart disease, coronary problems and diabetes. ·Affordable housing: Renton will support initiatives to: a) restore the previously higher funding level of 6b. ‐ Community and Economic Development Department  recommends approval of the 2011 State Legislative Agenda and  Page 11 of 195 DRAFT DRAFT 4 the Housing Trust Fund (HTF), particularly given that the HTF is a likely revenue source for the Sunset Terrace housing project the City is strongly supporting; preserve funding for other programs such as the Transition Housing, Ownership and Rental (THOR) program. ·Permanent revenue stream for “4Culture”: Renton is working hard to foster a thriving arts and culture community and will support legislation to ensure a permanent, ongoing revenue stream for King County’s “4Culture” organization. The City supports the position of 4Culture and the Washington State Arts Alliance that investment in the arts is an investment in education and helps foster community and economic development. As outlined in Renton’s new Arts & Culture Master Plan, a base of strong arts and culture helps create vibrant communities that connect people across cultural boundaries, attracts tourism, and supports and enhances business retention and recruitment. ·Farmers Markets and Wine Tasting: Renton helps support one of the strongest Farmers Markets in the State, with approximately 4,000 people visiting Downtown Renton every Tuesday between June-September. The City supports continued state funding for the statewide Farmers Market network. Additionally, although not currently allowed by City code, Renton supports legislation to permit controlled wine tasting by Washington State wine vendors during Farmers Markets. TRACK/MONITOR ·Local Real Estate Excise Tax (REET): The Association of Washington Cities (AWC) is attempting to negotiate with the Washington Association of Realtors (WAR) an acceptable compromise for 2011 that would enable cities and counties more flexibility in how they spend the first and second quarter percent of their local REET. Renton will track this issue. Employee Services Issues/LEOFF/PERS SUPPORT/OPPOSE ·Oppose pension enhancements that add new costs – and fully fund pension responsibilities: Renton will follow the lead of the AWC in opposing pension enhancements that would add new costs to local governments, while at the same time urging the state to fully fund existing pension responsibilities. ·Reforms to better manage personnel and labor costs: Renton is prepared to support initiatives put forth by AWC and others to help better manage personnel and labor costs. ·“Presumptive disease” for police: Existing state law provides workers’ compensation benefits for firefighters, and families of firefighters, if their disease is presumed to have occurred as a result of the inherently dangerous conditions they faced during their terms of employment. This is defined narrowly within state law. If 2011 legislative initiatives are brought forward to expand the reach of “presumptive disease” laws to police employees, it will present cost impacts and concerns for Renton. The City will work through AWC in this area. 6b. ‐ Community and Economic Development Department  recommends approval of the 2011 State Legislative Agenda and  Page 12 of 195 DRAFT DRAFT 5 TRACK/MONITOR ·LEOFF 1 retirees: Renton has some 98 retired LEOFF 1 employees, and 3 active employees who are eligible for the LEOFF 1 retirement program. Like many other cities, Renton continues to seek State assistance in addressing the medical costs for LEOFF 1. Renton will work through AWC in this area. Environmental Issues/Utilities/Water/Stormwater SUPPORT/OPPOSE ·Puget Sound Action Agenda and the Puget Sound Salmon Recovery Plan: The City will support efforts by the Puget Sound Partnership and King County Water Resource Inventory Areas (WRIAs) to establish dedicated funding to implement the Puget Sound Action Agenda and the Puget Sound Salmon Recovery Plan. ·Stormwater Funding: Renton will support a 2011 Department of Ecology request bill designed to create new financing mechanisms for cities and counties to meet their very costly Clean Water Act requirements under what is known as the National Pollutant Discharge and Elimination System (NPDES). Funding for stormwater is a key to meeting the federally-mandated, state-administered requirements. ·Water rights fees: Renton will be closely watching a 2011 Department of Ecology request bill that is designed to increase water rights fees to better fund the water resources program. A concern of water utilities is that the fees will extend beyond pending rights applications to existing rights, and will be inequitably charged (for example, draft legislation does not extend the fees to developers of what are known as “exempt wells”). Renton is prepared to join other utilities in opposing legislation that goes too far in increasing fees and does not equitably extend and charge them to all users. TRACK/MONITOR ·Extending the current “Product Stewardship” program to prescription and pharmaceutical drug disposal: The Product Stewardship program was enacted by the Legislature as a manufacturer-financed program to allow for the environmentally safe disposal of products such as electronics and lights that contain mercury. King County Solid Waste and others will look to expand the program in 2011 to prescription and pharmaceutical drug disposal. Renton will track these efforts. Fire Prevention and Emergency Services SUPPORT/OPPOSE ·Simply Majority for EMS Levies: Fire Chiefs are expected to bring forth 2011 legislation that would allow Emergency Medical Services (EMS) levies to achieve voter approval with a 50 percent plus one majority, vs. the current 60 percent. Renton will support this issue. ·Funding to create regional Chemical, Biological, Radioactive, Nuclear and Explosive (CBRNE) Materials Handling and Response Centers: Securing funding for regionally-focused “CBRNE” efforts is a high priority of the Washington State Association of Fire Chiefs. Renton will support this legislative effort. 6b. ‐ Community and Economic Development Department  recommends approval of the 2011 State Legislative Agenda and  Page 13 of 195 DRAFT DRAFT 6 TRACK/MONITOR ·Permit incentives for homeowners who voluntarily install fire-suppression sprinkler systems in their residences: Renton will track this issue. Fiscal Issues SUPPORT/OPPOSE ·Oppose unfunded mandates, legislation that erodes local authority and/or legislation that erodes local tax revenue: This is an annual staple of the City’s legislative agenda and directly relates to “basic premises” upon which the annual Legislative Agenda is built. ·Support legislative changes to help local governments operate more efficiently and reduce costs: The Association of Washington Cities (AWC) and the Washington State Association of Counties (WSAC) are proposing to the Governor and Legislature a series of ideas to help local governments operate more efficiently, reduce or delay cost impacts or relieve cost burdens altogether. Examples include public records request reforms, notice changes under the State Environmental Policy and Shoreline Management acts; delaying the date by which public fleets must deploy biofuel-powered or electric vehicles; and others. Renton is poised to support these efforts. ·Oppose countywide utility tax authority and support unincorporated area utility tax: If King County or the Washington State Association of Counties promotes legislation to establish countywide utility taxing authority, Renton will join numerous other municipalities and the AWC in opposition. A countywide utility tax would result in a “double tax” on city residents who already pay this tax to Renton. However, the city will support a legislative initiative to establish unincorporated area utility tax authority for counties, particularly if a portion of the revenue is dedicated to the transition costs for cities making progress at annexing urban unincorporated areas. ·Restrict business license authority: The Washington State Retailers Association may advance 2011 legislation to restrict cities’ authority to impose business license fees. If so, Renton will join AWC and others in opposing this local pre-emption effort. General Government SUPPORT/OPPOSE ·Protecting bidding laws and contracting authority: Renton will join other local governments in working to protect local government authority in contracting and bidding laws in 2011. ·Shifting liability to municipal utilities under the “Call Before You Dig” law: In 2009, underground contractors sought to add a new definition to the “Call Before You Dig” area of state law, one which would have shifted liability and costs to municipal utilities. An interim work group has been formed, and 2011 legislation is possible. If underground contractors go the same route as they did in 2009, Renton will join AWC and municipal utilities in opposing such a legislative initiative. 6b. ‐ Community and Economic Development Department  recommends approval of the 2011 State Legislative Agenda and  Page 14 of 195 DRAFT DRAFT 7 TRACK/MONITOR ·Expansion of wrongful death and injury claims: Legislation to expand wrongful death and injury claims against local agencies and the private sector narrowly failed in 2008, 2009 and 2010, and the issue may be re-introduced in 2011. Renton will monitor this issue closely. Growth Management/Land Use and Permitting SUPPORT/OPPOSE ·Requiring consistent development standards in PAAs or UGAs: The AWC may promote legislation in 2011 to require that counties have development standards in Potential Annexation Areas or Urban Growth Areas that are consistent with those in place for neighboring cities. Absent the more direct legislation, an initiative may also require that counties engage in a higher level of joint planning with respect to these areas. Renton will support either or both of these legislative initiatives. ·Making GMA update cycles more consistent with federal Census updates: Current law requires that GMA comprehensive plans be updated at least once every seven years. The updates are dependent on accurate population and Census data – and yet Census numbers are updated only once every 10 years. Planning Directors, AWC, and others may advance 2011 legislation to better “harmonize” the timing of these and other required updates. If such legislation is advanced, Renton will support it. ·Local zoning control over location of mini-casinos: Renton will support legislation to explicitly clarify cities’ authority to zone the location of mini-casinos and to grandfather in existing zoning restrictions. TRACK/MONITOR ·Timing of when impact fees are collected: Renton will track legislation likely to be brought forth by the Master Builders Association attempting to require that impact fee collection for residential housing be delayed until the time of sale or closing on the homes. Human and Social Services SUPPORT/OPPOSE ·Full funding of “2-1-1” system: Renton will support continued efforts to obtain state funds to help fully fund the new 2-1-1 emergency communications system to help seniors, the disabled and vulnerable populations within Washington State access social services. ·Public health funding: Renton will support efforts to preserve funding for Seattle-King County Public Health. A strong public health system promotes a healthier community and prevents and protects against injury and disease. ·Energy assistance for low-income residents: During economic down times, the demand for low-income energy assistance rises dramatically. Renton will support state partnership funding for energy assistance for low-income residents. ·Employment-Based English as a Second Language/English Language Learners (ESL/ELL) Training: Many employers who are faced with a high rate of job vacancies due to a lack of skilled employees are finding it necessary to consider alternative ways of training existing employees to take on more advanced responsibilities. Employment-Based ESL/ELL training helps workers overcome barriers such as transportation and child care and can lead an immigrant or refugee to English proficiency quicker 6b. ‐ Community and Economic Development Department  recommends approval of the 2011 State Legislative Agenda and  Page 15 of 195 DRAFT DRAFT 8 when using work-based materials. Having employment based ESL/ELL for low-wage working immigrants and refugees can open up new career opportunities that lead them to higher wage employment. Renton has appreciated the Legislature’s recent funding of Renton Technical College’s ESL/ELL workplace-based programs and joins the Renton Chamber of Commerce in seeking ongoing and sustainable state funding for workplace-based ESL/ELL programs. Telecommunications SUPPORT/OPPOSE ·Oppose statewide franchise fee authority: In 2009, Verizon approached the Legislature, seeking enactment of a statewide franchising structure for cable and video services. Had the legislation succeeded, it would have pre-empted local franchising authority that guides cable service in Renton and other local markets around the state. If this is proposed in 2011, Renton will join AWC in strongly opposing this attack on local control. Transportation/Transit SUPPORT/OPPOSE ·Forcing the consolidation of the Transportation Improvement Board (TIB), Freight Mobility Strategic Investment Board and County Road Administration Board (CRAB): In 2010, the Governor proposed consolidating the TIB, FMSIB, and CRAB and placing them under the auspices of the WSDOT’s Local Highways Program. Renton believes TIB and FMSIB in particular are two very focused, transparent, accountable and effective agencies and would oppose a forced consolidation. However, the City appreciates and supports the efforts by an interim legislative task force that is reviewing TIB, FMSIB and CRAB operations and how they can increase efficiency. ·Street Utility: In 2011, the AWC and a number of individual jurisdictions will seek to obtain legislative authorization to allow cities to establish “Street Utilities” for local maintenance and preservation needs. Renton will support this effort. Workforce Development/Education SUPPORT/OPPOSE ·The City recognizes that its success increasingly depends on an educated and flexible workforce for all of its employers, public and private alike. Employers need well educated and highly skilled employees to grow and thrive. Because all students must be prepared to enter the globally competitive workforce, the City supports efforts to adequately fund education reform. The State’s investment should: o Further strengthen accountability – measurable performance should be ensured at all levels of education. o Attract and retain quality teachers and address the shortage of educators in the fields of mathematics, science, special education, early learning and bilingual studies. o Create a more competitive workforce by expanding funding for FTE enrollment at all levels of higher education and prioritizing offerings toward jobs and industries of the future and high-demand fields. o Encourage stronger coordination of workforce development between K-12 and post-secondary education entities and base targets on employer and economic demands. ·The City supports fulfillment of the state’s “paramount duty” to fully fund basic education costs 6b. ‐ Community and Economic Development Department  recommends approval of the 2011 State Legislative Agenda and  Page 16 of 195 DRAFT DRAFT 9 including transportation, building and utility costs and a full six-period high school day so students can meet graduation requirements within four years. ·Work Force Development: Renton supports the “Retooling Washington’s Workforce” initiative embarked upon by the State Work Force Training Board, and is prepared to support 2011 legislative initiatives that grow out of that effort. 6b. ‐ Community and Economic Development Department  recommends approval of the 2011 State Legislative Agenda and  Page 17 of 195 CITY OF RENTON COUNCIL AGENDA BILL Subject/Title: Request for Utility Bill Adjustment - RVA Center Meeting: Regular Council - 15 Nov 2010 Exhibits: Issue Paper Submitting Data: Dept/Div/Board: Finance & Information Technology Staff Contact: Iwen Wang, Administrator Recommended Action: Refer to Finance Committee Fiscal Impact: Expenditure Required: $ 4,720.32 Transfer Amendment: $ Amount Budgeted: $ Revenue Generated: $ Total Project Budget: $ City Share Total Project: $ SUMMARY OF ACTION: RVA Center LLC is requesting partial relief in the amount of $4,720.32 for past utility bills incurred by a previous tenant, Pan Asian Grill, who occupied suites F and G (Account #024503-000) at the service address of 601 South Grady Way since 2008. They requested the relief due to they were not informed of the option of receiving late and shut off notices under the tenant billing system. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Grant the fee adjustment in the amount of $4,720.32. 6c. ‐ Finance and Information Technology Department reports request  from RVA Center, LLC for utility bill adjustment and  Page 18 of 195 FINANCE AND INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY M E M O R A N D U M DATE:November 8, 2010 TO:Don Persson, Council President Members of the Renton City Council VIA:Denis Law, Mayor FROM:Iwen Wang, Administrator SUBJECT:Utility Bill Adjustment Request – RVA Center ISSUE Should an adjustment of $4,720.32 be made to the RVA Center (Account #024503-000) at the service address of 601 South Grady Way, Suites F and G for past utility bills incurred by a previous tenant? RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends granting the fee adjustment to RVA Center. BACKGROUND SUMMARY RVA Center LLC, is the owner of the property located at 601 South Grady Way, commonly known as the Renton Village Shopping Center. Pan Asian Grill was a tenant occupying suite F and G of the center since 2008. Like most of the Center’s large tenants, Pan Asian was billed directly for their water, sewer, metro, and garbage services. No late notices had been sent to the owner. Pan Asian paid their monthly bills in a timely manner until September 2009. They had paid both August and September bills on October 19, 2009, and then consistently late with their payments by 2-3 weeks after due dates, but they always made the full payment until May 2010. Their May billing was mailed to them on May 31, and was due on June 25th. We did not receive the payment by the end of June and a “final notice” was sent to them in early July, a 10% penalty was assessed on July 19, and the meter was shut off on July 22. The City did not receive a call to restore water service and the meter was supposed to remain turned off. Again in August 2010, the past due amount was still delinquent and by now also included June’s service costs. When the staff went to check the water services on August 24, they discovered the water was on and the tenant had vacated the space, and the owner was readying the space for a new tenant. At the same time, the City received a letter from the attorney for Pan Asian Grill stated that his client has ceased to operate and the business is dissolving, and that no assets would be available to distribute to creditors, vendors, or account holders. The balance owing, now including July’s service and shut off fee and penalties is $9,401.16. Upon discovery of the situation and the outstanding balance, RVA Center LLC, wrote the City requesting relief from the past due fees incurred by their tenant since they had no prior knowledge of this. It has been the City’s practice in recent years to maintain all utility services 6c. ‐ Finance and Information Technology Department reports request  from RVA Center, LLC for utility bill adjustment and  Page 19 of 195 Don Persson, Council President Members of the Renton City Council Page 2 of 2 November 8, 2010 h:\finance\council\2010\2010 rva center ub fee adjustment.doc under the owner’s name, and require an owner to execute a “Tenant Billing Form” authorizing the City to bill tenants directly and on the same form they would also choose whether to receive late notices. In further review of this account, we noticed most of the Center’s accounts were set up to go to tenants directly and no owner information on these accounts at all. Apparently the setup was established long ago in our system before multiple notifications (which is necessary for “tenant billing” option to work) was available. The owner has since paid $4,311.18, or roughly 50% of the service amount billed for May, June, and July, and requesting the City to remove all penalties and shutoff fees, and the remaining balance on the account which is an amount of $4,720.32 as detailed below: KC Water Sewer Wastewater Garbage Totals May 2010 $550.51 $418.67 $965.36 $1,162.10 $3,096.64 July 2010 200.18 147.59 339.42 936.49 1,623.68 Totals $750.69 $566.26 $1,304.78 $2,098.59 $4,720.32 CONCLUSION Staff has since worked with the owner in setting up the appropriate tenant billing authorization and is recommending Council’s approval of the above adjustments as requested. Attachments: RVA Center Letter to Gregg Zimmerman, 8/25/10 (received August 27, 2010) RVA Center Letter to Iwen Wang, 8/25/10 (received October 4, 2010) 6c. ‐ Finance and Information Technology Department reports request  from RVA Center, LLC for utility bill adjustment and  Page 20 of 195 6c. ‐ Finance and Information Technology Department reports request  from RVA Center, LLC for utility bill adjustment and  Page 21 of 195 6c. ‐ Finance and Information Technology Department reports request  from RVA Center, LLC for utility bill adjustment and  Page 22 of 195 6c. ‐ Finance and Information Technology Department reports request  from RVA Center, LLC for utility bill adjustment and  Page 23 of 195 6c. ‐ Finance and Information Technology Department reports request  from RVA Center, LLC for utility bill adjustment and  Page 24 of 195 6c. ‐ Finance and Information Technology Department reports request  from RVA Center, LLC for utility bill adjustment and  Page 25 of 195 6c. ‐ Finance and Information Technology Department reports request  from RVA Center, LLC for utility bill adjustment and  Page 26 of 195 6c. ‐ Finance and Information Technology Department reports request  from RVA Center, LLC for utility bill adjustment and  Page 27 of 195 CITY OF RENTON COUNCIL AGENDA BILL Subject/Title: 2010 Year End Budget Amendment Ordinance Meeting: Regular Council - 15 Nov 2010 Exhibits: Issue Paper 2010 Final Budget Adjustment.pdf Ordinance Submitting Data: Dept/Div/Board: Finance & Information Technology Staff Contact: Iwen Wang, FIT Administrator Recommended Action: Refer to Finance Committee Fiscal Impact: Expenditure Required: $ $4,852,225 Transfer Amendment: $ Amount Budgeted: $ Revenue Generated: $$2,803,090 Total Project Budget: $ City Share Total Project: $ SUMMARY OF ACTION: The proposed budget amendment increases the overall 2010 City budget appropriation by 4.9 million, and: 1) Recognizes grants/donations and associated program costs; 2) Makes minor housekeeping corrections; and 3) Aligns project budgets. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Approve the proposed 2010 Year End Budget Amendment and place the ordinance on for first reading. 6d. ‐ Finance and Information Technology Department  recommends approval of a 2010 budget amendment ordinance  Page 28 of 195 FINANCE AND INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY M E M O R A N D U M DATE:November 9, 2010 TO:Don Persson, Council President Members of the Renton City Council VIA:Denis Law, Mayor FROM:Iwen Wang, Administrator SUBJECT:2010 Year End Budget Amendment Ordinance ISSUE Should the 2010 budget be amended to incorporate changes as detailed below? RECOMMENDATION Adopt the ordinance amending the 2010 budget. BACKGROUND SUMMARY The proposed Year-End Budget Amendments will primarily incorporate various changes and actions that have previously been reviewed and approved by the Council; and to a lesser degree, it will make housekeeping corrections, recognize increase in or new grants, donations that were not previously anticipated; and lastly, will align project budgets as outlined below. Highlight of Amendments: 1.$1.815 million interest bearing interfund loan from General Fund to Golf Course Fund to allow the Golf Course to retire its revenue bonds early. 2.$39k in cost and $35k in revenue related to the National Center for State Courts Assessment Grant from the State Justice Institute (private grant). 3.$8,500 for 4 Cultural Grant from King County and associated costs. 4.$42k for Edward Byrne Memorial Justice Assistance Grant (JAG) from US Department of Justice for the purchase of 24 Automatic External Defibrillators. 5.$57k for 2010 Final CDBG Contract and associated costs of $42k. Grant is from King County. 6.$5,000 “Take Me Fishing” grant from National Recreation and Park Association and associated costs of $2,800. 7.Transfer funds to Fleet Fund (501) for the purchase of a Special Events Trailer. 8.$12k for Sponsorship of Youth Programs’ donation and associated costs. 9.Reduction of $34k in grant revenue and associate costs because LED light project’s bids came in lower than expected. 10.$252k in both revenue and cost adjustments in the General Government Debt Service Fund for Fire Station 13 acquisition. This is to recognize the complete financial transactions that should include the excess levy property tax generated from the Benson Hill area (revenue side) that is paying for part of the costs (expense side). 11.$143k in Capital and Professional Services for Leased City Properties Fund (108). This will be funded by fund balance. 12.$30k for Tree Canopy Grant and related costs. 6d. ‐ Finance and Information Technology Department  recommends approval of a 2010 budget amendment ordinance  Page 29 of 195 Don Persson, Council President Members of the Renton City Council Page 2 of 2 November 9, 2010 h:\finance\council\2010\2010 year end budget adjustment agbip.doc 13.$105k repayment of interfund loan from Airport to Water and Waste Water Funds to finance utility extensions approved in 2009, not included in the adopted 2010 budget. 14.$109k Waste Reduction and Recycling grant and corresponding program costs. 15.$298k NPDES Permit Grant ($200k in Surface Water operations and $98k in capital) and related costs; 16.$45k, carry forward missed item in Communications Fund (505), Print Mailer Equipment was budgeted for in 2009 but not purchased until 2010. Project Budget Adjustments / Transfers: 1.Move $22k from Urban Forestry Program to Urban Tree Canopy Assessment project (Fund 316). 2.Move $240k from Intersection Safety and Mobility (TIP #22) that was earmarked for signals along NE 4th to NE 3rd/4th Corridor Improvements (TIP #5) to better coordinate and manage the projects (Fund 317). 3.Move the balance of $3k from Surface Water Rehabilitation project to Major Facility Maintenance project (Fund 422). 4.Move $50k from Lake Wash Beach project to Cascade Interceptor Restoration project (Fund 426), already approved by Council. 5.Move $50k from the Wetland Mitigation Bank Project to the Green River Ecosystem Study Project (Fund 427), already approved by Council. CONCLUSION Most of the amendments are to incorporate items that have previously been approved by the City Council and are housekeeping in nature. The market-rate based interfund loan will temporarily reduce General Fund’s fund balance and will be restored over the 5-year amortization period. Staff recommends Council approve the proposed adjustments. Attachments: Budget Amendment Ordinance and Attachment A Proposed Year End Budget Amendment Detail 6d. ‐ Finance and Information Technology Department  recommends approval of a 2010 budget amendment ordinance  Page 30 of 195 2010 Year End Budget Adjustment Detail 1/4 GENERAL FUND (Fund 000) Adopted Adjustment Amended Beginning Fund Balance 11,955,285 - 11,955,285 REVENUES 105,584,156 Exec National Center for State Courts Assessment Grant 35,000 CED King County 4-Culture Grant 8,500 Police Edward Byrne Memorial Justice Assistance Grant - AED 42,164 CS Take Me Fishing Program Grant 5,000 CS Sponsorship of Youth Programs 12,075 CS CDBG-R LED Light Project (34,052) CS 2010 Final CDBG Contract 56,728 FIT FD40 Loan Benson Hill principal credit needs to be budgeted. 127,434 FIT FD40 Loan Benson Hill interest credit needs to be budgeted. 125,059 Total Revenue Adjustment 105,584,156 377,908 105,962,064 EXPENDITURES 106,294,348 CS Resolution 4075 interfund loan between general fund (000) and golf course fund (404) 1,875,000 Exec National Center for State Courts Assessment Grant 38,500 CED King County 4-Culture Grant 8,500 Police Edward Byrne Memorial Justice Assistance Grant - AED 42,164 CS 2010 Final CDBG Contract 57,585 CS 2010 Final CDBG Contract (Allocation changed 38% Gen Fund 62% CDBG) (15,572) CS Take Me Fishing Program Grant 2,800 CS Transfer Special Events Trailer to Fleet 7,500 CS Transfer Special Events Trailer to Fleet (7,500) CS Sponsorship of Youth Programs-Program Supplies 12,075 CS CDBG-R LED Light Project (34,502) FIT FD40 Loan Benson Hill principal credit needs to be budgeted. 127,434 FIT FD40 Loan Benson Hill interest credit needs to be budgeted. 125,059 Total Expenditure Adjustment 106,294,348 2,239,043 108,533,391 Ending Fund Balance 11,245,093 (1,861,135) 9,383,958 LEASED FACILITIES FUND (Fund 108) Adopted Adjustment Amended Beginning Fund Balance 837,613 - 837,613 REVENUES 1,669,586 Total Revenue Adjustment 1,669,586 - 1,669,586 EXPENDITURES 1,511,561 CS Projected increase in Capital 100,000 CS Projected increase in Professional Services 43,000 Total Expenditure Adjustment 1,511,561 143,000 1,654,561 Ending Fund Balance 995,638 (143,000) 852,638 MUNICIPAL CIP FUND (Fund 316) Adopted Adjustment Amended Beginning Fund Balance 6,933,186 - 6,933,186 REVENUES 1,333,553 CS Tree Canopy Grant 30,000 Total Revenue Adjustment 1,333,553 30,000 1,363,553 EXPENDITURES 7,681,771 CS Tree Canopy Grant 30,000 CS Moved to Urban Tree Canopy Assessment (22,225) CS Moved from Urban Forestry Program 22,225 Total Expenditure Adjustment 7,681,771 30,000 7,711,771 Ending Fund Balance 584,968 - 584,968 \\rvfps-01\Depts\FIS\Finance\Budget\2010 Budget\2.Budget Adjustments\Final Budget Adjustment\2010 Final Budget Adjustment.xlsx11/08/2010 6d. ‐ Finance and Information Technology Department  recommends approval of a 2010 budget amendment ordinance  Page 31 of 195 2010 Year End Budget Adjustment Detail 2/4 TRANSPORTATION CIP FUND (Fund 317) Adopted Adjustment Amended Beginning Fund Balance 2,892,341 - 2,892,341 REVENUES 31,352,042 Total Revenue Adjustment 31,352,042 - 31,352,042 EXPENDITURES 33,183,734 PW Moved funds to NE 3rd/4th Corridor Improvements 240,000 PW Moved funds from Intersection Safety and Mobility (240,000) Total Expenditure Adjustment 33,183,734 - 33,183,734 Ending Fund Balance 1,060,649 - 1,060,649 AIRPORT FUND (Fund 402/422) Adopted Adjustment Amended Beginning Fund Balance 1,049,083 - 1,049,083 REVENUES 3,495,163 Total Revenue Adjustment 3,495,163 - 3,495,163 EXPENDITURES 2,833,285 PW Interfund Loan Principal Payment (RES 4025) 88,579 PW Interfund Loan Interest Payment (RES 4025) 16,625 PW Move balance from Surface Water Rehabilitation to Major Facility Maintenance (3,160) PW Move balance from Surface Water Rehabilitation to Major Facility Maintenance 3,160 Total Expenditure Adjustment 2,833,285 105,204 2,938,489 Ending Fund Balance 1,710,961 (105,204) 1,605,757 SOLIDWASTE UTILITY FUND (Fund 403) Adopted Adjustment Amended Beginning Fund Balance 326,034 - 326,034 REVENUES 15,027,000 PW WRR Grant Revenue 109,538 Total Revenue Adjustment 15,027,000 109,538 15,136,538 EXPENDITURES 15,037,130 PW WRR Grant Expenditure 109,538 Total Expenditure Adjustment 15,037,130 109,538 15,146,668 Ending Fund Balance 315,904 - 315,904 GOLF COURSE FUND (Fund 404/424) Adopted Adjustment Amended Beginning Fund Balance 1,085,801 - 1,085,801 REVENUES 2,633,545 CS Interfund Loan from General Fund (RES 4075) 1,875,000 Total Revenue Adjustment 2,633,545 1,875,000 4,508,545 EXPENDITURES 2,869,336 CS Redemption of Revenue Bonds outstanding (RES 4075) 1,875,000 Total Expenditure Adjustment 2,869,336 1,875,000 4,744,336 Ending Fund Balance 850,010 - 850,010 \\rvfps-01\Depts\FIS\Finance\Budget\2010 Budget\2.Budget Adjustments\Final Budget Adjustment\2010 Final Budget Adjustment.xlsx11/08/2010 6d. ‐ Finance and Information Technology Department  recommends approval of a 2010 budget amendment ordinance  Page 32 of 195 2010 Year End Budget Adjustment Detail 3/4 WATER UTILITY FUND (Fund 405/425) Adopted Adjustment Amended Beginning Fund Balance 7,157,108 - 7,157,108 REVENUES 14,776,910 PW Interfund Loan repayment from Airport 53,156 Total Revenue Adjustment 14,776,910 53,156 14,830,066 EXPENDITURES 17,222,205 Total Expenditure Adjustment 17,222,205 - 17,222,205 Ending Fund Balance 4,711,813 53,156 4,764,969 WASTEWATER UTILITY FUND (Fund 406/416/426) Adopted Adjustment Amended Beginning Fund Balance 2,775,538 - 2,775,538 REVENUES 20,431,453 Total Revenue Adjustment 20,431,453 - 20,431,453 EXPENDITURES 22,044,799 PW Moved funds to Cascade Interceptor Restoration project (u45498). 50,000 PW Moved funds from Lk Wash Beach project (u45492). (50,000) Total Expenditure Adjustment 22,044,799 - 22,044,799 Ending Fund Balance 1,162,192 - 1,162,192 SURFACEWATER UTILITY FUND (Fund 407/427) Adopted Adjustment Amended Beginning Fund Balance 3,982,842 - 3,982,842 REVENUES 9,825,157 PW Interfund Loan repayment from Airport 52,048 PW Surface Water National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) Municipal Stormw 297,940 Total Revenue Adjustment 9,825,157 349,988 10,175,145 EXPENDITURES 12,145,464 PW Surface Water NPDES for operating expenditures 199,500 PW Surface Water NPDES for capital expenditures 98,440 PW Move funds to the Green River Ecosystem Study Project 50,000 PW Move funds from the Wetland Mitigation Bank Project (50,000) Total Expenditure Adjustment 12,145,464 297,940 12,443,404 Ending Fund Balance 1,662,535 52,048 1,714,583 EQUIPMENT RENTAL FUND (Fund 501) Adopted Adjustment Amended Beginning Fund Balance 4,593,399 - 4,593,399 REVENUES 3,631,241 PW Transfer Special Events Trailer to Fleet 7,500 Total Revenue Adjustment 3,631,241 7,500 3,638,741 EXPENDITURES 3,414,047 PW Transfer Special Events Trailer to Fleet 7,500 Total Expenditure Adjustment 3,414,047 7,500 3,421,547 Ending Fund Balance 4,810,593 - 4,810,593 \\rvfps-01\Depts\FIS\Finance\Budget\2010 Budget\2.Budget Adjustments\Final Budget Adjustment\2010 Final Budget Adjustment.xlsx11/08/2010 6d. ‐ Finance and Information Technology Department  recommends approval of a 2010 budget amendment ordinance  Page 33 of 195 2010 Year End Budget Adjustment Detail 4/4 COMMUNICATIONS FUND (Fund 505) Adopted Adjustment Amended Beginning Fund Balance 111,818 - 111,818 REVENUES 1,049,671 Total Revenue Adjustment 1,049,671 - 1,049,671 EXPENDITURES 877,560 Exec Carry Forward mailer budgeted in 2009 but purchased was finalized in 2010 45,000 Total Expenditure Adjustment 877,560 45,000 922,560 Ending Fund Balance 283,929 (45,000) 238,929 \\rvfps-01\Depts\FIS\Finance\Budget\2010 Budget\2.Budget Adjustments\Final Budget Adjustment\2010 Final Budget Adjustment.xlsx11/08/2010 6d. ‐ Finance and Information Technology Department  recommends approval of a 2010 budget amendment ordinance  Page 34 of 195 6d. ‐ Finance and Information Technology Department  recommends approval of a 2010 budget amendment ordinance  Page 35 of 195 6d. ‐ Finance and Information Technology Department  recommends approval of a 2010 budget amendment ordinance  Page 36 of 195 6d. ‐ Finance and Information Technology Department  recommends approval of a 2010 budget amendment ordinance  Page 37 of 195 CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON, ADOPTING THE 2011/2012 CITY OF RENTON FEE SCHEDULE BROCHURE. WHEREAS, on November 23, 2009, the Council adopted Ordinance No. 5509, which removed many fees from the Renton Municipal Code and consolidated them into the 2010 City of Renton Fee Schedule Brochure ("fee brochure"); and WHEREAS, on March 22, 2010, the Council approved an amended fee brochure to revise Fire and Emergency Services Department fees and make other housekeeping amendments to the fee brochure; and WHEREAS, on October 11, 2010, the Council adopted Resolution No. 4071, which approved an amended fee brochure to add development fees, permit fees, land use review fees, school impact fees, public works fees, and a technology surcharge fee to the fee brochure and move the fire department fees to the development fees section; and WHEREAS, it is necessary to approve a fee brochure for the years 2011 and 2012 as a part of the City's 2011/2012 biennial budget; NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON, DOES RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS: SECTION I. The above recitals are found to be true and correct in all respects. SECTION II. The 2011/2012 City of Renton Fee Schedule Brochure, attached hereto, is hereby adopted by reference. A copy of the fee brochure is at all times filed with the City Clerk. 8a. ‐ Adopting the 2011/2012 Fee Schedule Brochure (Approved via  11/1/2010 Committee of the Whole report)Page 38 of 195 RESOLUTION NO. PASSED BY THE CITY COUNCIL this day of , 2010. Bonnie I. Walton, City Clerk APPROVED BY THE MAYOR this day of , 2010. Denis Law, Mayor Approved as to form: Lawrence J. Warren, City Attorney RES.1484:10/21/10:scr 8a. ‐ Adopting the 2011/2012 Fee Schedule Brochure (Approved via  11/1/2010 Committee of the Whole report)Page 39 of 195 2011/2012 CITY OF RENTON FEE SCHEDULE BROCHURE The following charges are hereby established by the City which shall be collected for the following instruments, reports, codes, and services: 1. Maps: a. Zoning maps-standard 11 x 17 b. Zoning maps-large 24 x 36 c. Comprehensive Plan map - standard 11 x 17 d. Comprehensive Plan map - large 24 x 36 e. Precinct maps 2. Plat: a. First page b. Each additional page 3. Photocopies: Up to ten (10) pages free. After ten (10) pages, all pages including the first ten (10) will be charged as follows: a. Each 8.5" x 11" or 8.5" x 14" b. Each 11"x 17" c. Each 8.5" x 11" or 8.5" x 14" color 4. Budget: a. City's Budget b. City's Budget to other municipality or quasi-municipal corporation or other nonprofit charitable or education organization 5. Audio or Video Recording Copies: a. Audio recording, each copy b. Video recording, each copy 6. Regulations and Plans: a. Comprehensive Plan and Map b. Title IV, Development Regulations: c. Text and Zoning Map d. Text Only e. Individual Chapters of Development Regulations f. Renton Municipal Code (two volumes) g. Code Supplements, per year: (i) Titles 1-III and VI-X (ii) Title IV 7. Miscellaneous Services: a. Certification and Notary Fees - Clerk's Certification b. Notary Public Attestation or Acknowledgement or as otherwise provided for in RCW 42.28.090, per signature c. Hold Harmless Agreements and other similar document not otherwise provided for d. Lamination of Licenses, Pictures $4.00 $10.00 $4.00 $10.00 $5.00 $2.00 $1.00 $0.15 $0.20 $0.25 $10.00 N/C $10.00 $15.00 $30.00 $110.00 $100.00 $10.00 $400.00 $70.00 $70.00 $10.00 $6.00 $20.00 $6.00 $4.00 $12.00 $4.00 $12.00 $5.00 $2.00 $1.00 $0.15 $0.20 $0.25 $10.00 N/C $10.00 $15.00 $30.00 $110.00 $100.00 $10.00 $400.00 $70.00 $70.00 $10.00 $6.00 $20.00 $6.00 $4.00 $12.00 $4.00 $12.00 $5.00 $2.00 $1.00 $0.15 $0.20 $0.25 $10.00 N/C $10.00 $15.00 $30.00 $110.00 $100.00 $10.00 $400.00 $70.00 $70.00 $10.00 $6.00 $20.00 $6.00 8a. ‐ Adopting the 2011/2012 Fee Schedule Brochure (Approved via  11/1/2010 Committee of the Whole report)Page 40 of 195 Type of Fees e. Review of Shopping Cart Containment and Retrieval Plans 8. Miscellaneous Charges for Police Services: a. Police Reports per page b. Record Checks (Written Response) $5.00 c. Photographs - Digital on CD $12.00 d. Photographs - black & white or color - Cost of developing film e. Fingerprint Cards (i) Each additional card 9. Charges for Fire Documents: a. Fire reports per page b. Fire investigative report on CD $12.00 c. First copy - black & white or color - Cost of developing film d. Additional copy - black & white or color - Cost of developing film 10. Computer Listings: a. City of Renton new business list b. List of all business licenses c. Copies requested to be faxed, local number d. Copies requested to be faxed, long distance number (i) One (1) - five (5) pages (ii) Six (6) or more pages (ten (10) page limit) 11. Utility Fees: a. Special Request Water Meter Reading b. Utility New Account Setup c. Utility Billing Account Transfer (tenant billing form) d. Water utility outstanding balance search requested by fax, messenger, or letter 12. Schedule of Fines for False Alarms: a. First, second, and third false alarms in a registration year* b. Fourth and fifth false alarms in a registration year* c. Sixth false alarm and successive false alarms in a registration year* d. Late Registration Penalty e. Late False Alarm Payment Penalty f. Appeal Hearing Cancellation Fee *A registration year shall mean January 1 thru December 31 each year. 13. NSF Check Fees 14. Veterans Park Tile: Three lines: $150.00 $0.15 $5.00 $12.00 Cost $5.00 $1.00 $0.15 $12.00 Cost Cost $10.00 $20.00 $3.00 $10.00 $20.00 $30.00 $25.00 $5.00 $25.00 N/C $50.00 $100.00 $50.00 $25.00 $10.00 $15.00 $75.00 $150.00 $0.15 $5.00 $12.00 Cost $5.00 $1.00 $0.15 $12.00 Cost Cost $10.00 $20.00 $3.00 $10.00 $20.00 $30.00 $25.00 $5.00 $25.00 N/C $50.00 $100.00 $50.00 $25.00 $10.00 $25.00 $75.00 $150.00 $0.15 $5.00 $12.00 Cost $5.00 $1.00 $0.15 $12.00 Cost Cost $10.00 $20.00 $3.00 $10.00 $20.00 $30.00 $25.00 $5.00 $25.00 N/C $50.00 $100.00 $50.00 $25.00 $10.00 $25.00 $75.00 iSECTION II: MAPLEWQO^ Green Fees: The cost of golf course green fees shall be as follows. For purposes of this section, "weekend" shall mean Friday, Saturday, and Sunday. "Weekday" shall mean the remaining four days of the week. "Junior" shall mean ages 17 and under, "Senior" shall mean ages 62 and over, a. Weekday (iii) 18 Hole 9 Hole 18 Hole, Senior 9 Hole, Senior 18 Hole, Junior $31.00 $22.00 $22.00 $16.00 $16.00 $31.00 $22.00 $22.00 $16.00 $16.00 $31.00 $22.00 $22.00 $16.00 $16.00 Revised 11/02/10 8a. ‐ Adopting the 2011/2012 Fee Schedule Brochure (Approved via  11/1/2010 Committee of the Whole report)Page 41 of 195 Type of Fees (iv) 9 Hole, Junior 2. 3. 4. 5. b. Weekend (i) 18 Hole (ii) 9 Hole Club Rental: Golf Cart Fees: a. 18 Hole b. 9 Hole Driving Range Fees: a. Large Bucket b. Small Bucket c. Warm-up Bucket Lesson Fees: a. 1/2 Hour Private b. 1 Hour Private c. 1/2 Hour Series Private d. 1 Hour Series Private e. Group Series 1. Short-Term/Retail Parking: Parking rates for retail parking will 2. be as follows: a. Zero (0) - two (2) hours b. Two (2)-four (4) hours c. Four (4)-six (6) hours d. Six (6) or more hours Retail parkers will register their space number and pay for parki lobbies. Discounted Rate: A discounted rate for parking in the long-term, surface parking lots will be provided for any person or entity wh least a six (6) month period. The fees will be as negotiated. SECTION IV: AQUATIC FEES: 1. Admission for the Aquatic Center shall be as follows: a. Regular Session (i) Resident infants-under 1 year (ii) Non-resident infants - under 1 year (iii) Resident youth -1 to 4 years (iv) Non-resident youth -1 to 4 years (v) Resident youth - 5 to 12 years (vi) Non-resident youth - 5 to 12 years (vii) Resident teen-13 to 17 years (viii) Non-resident teen -13 to 17 years (ix) Resident adult-18 to 49 years (x) Non-resident adult -18 to 49 years (xi) Resident senior-50 years and up (xii) Non-resident senior - 50 years and up (xiii) Resident lap swim - water walking only (xiv) Non-resident lap swim-water walking only b. Twilight Session (i) Resident infants-under 1 year 2010 $12.00 $37.00 $22.00 $15.00 $26.00 $16.00 $7.00 $4.00 $2.00 $40.00 $60.00 $140.00 $220.00 $90.00 N/C $2.00 $4.00 $6.00 ig at pay stations 2011 $12.00 $37.00 $22.00 $15.00 $26.00 $16.00 $7.00 $4.00 $2.00 $40.00 $60.00 $140.00 $220.00 $90.00 N/C $2.00 $4.00 $6.00 2012 $12.00 $37.00 $22.00 $15.00 $26.00 $16.00 $7.00 $4.00 $2.00 $40.00 $60.00 $140.00 $220.00 $90.00 N/C $2.00 $4.00 $6.00 located in the garage first-floor card-accessed areas of the garage o lease(s) three (3 N/C N/C $2.00 $4.00 $5.00 $8.00 $6.00 $9.00 $7.00 $14.00 $6.00 $8.00 $3.00 $4.50 N/C ) or more parking N/C N/C $4.00 $8.00 $8.00 $14.00 $8.00 $14.00 $8.00 $14.00 $8.00 $14.00 $3.00 $4.50 N/C and in City space(s) for at N/C N/C $4.00 $8.00 $8.00 $14.00 $8.00 $14.00 $8.00 $14.00 $8.00 $14.00 $3.00 $4.50 N/C Revised 11/02/10 8a. ‐ Adopting the 2011/2012 Fee Schedule Brochure (Approved via  11/1/2010 Committee of the Whole report)Page 42 of 195 Type of Fees 2010 2011 2012 (ii) Non-resident infants - under 1 year (iii) Resident youth -1 to 4 years (iv) Non-resident youth -1 to 4 years (v) Resident youth - 5 to 12 years (vi) Non-resident youth - 5 to 12 years (vii) Resident teen -13 to 17 years (viii) Non-resident teen -13 to 17 years (ix) Resident adult-18 to 49 years (x) Non-resident adult -18 to 49 years (xi) Resident senior - 50 years and up (xii) Non-resident senior - 50 years and up (xiii) Resident lap swim - water walking only (xiv) Non-resident lap swim - water walking only c. Season Pass (i) Resident infants-under 1 year (ii) Non-resident infants - under 1 year (iii) Resident youth -1 to 4 years (iv) Non-resident youth -1 to 4 years (v) Resident youth - 5 to 12 years (vi) Non-resident youth - 5 to 12 years (vii) Resident teen -13 to 17 years (viii) Non-resident teen -13 to 17 years (ix) Resident adult-18 to 49 years (x) Non-resident adult -18 to 49 years (xi) Resident senior-50 years and up (xii) Non-resident senior - 50 years and up (xiii) Resident lap swim - water walking only (xiv) Non-resident lap swim - water walking only (xv) Resident family* rate (xvi) Non-resident family* rate N/C $1.50 $2.50 $3.50 $5.00 $4.00 $6.00 $5.00 $8.50 $3.50 $5.00 $3.00 $4.50 N/C N/C $20.00 $33.00 $50.00 $83.00 $62.00 $110.00 $75.00 $165.00 $62.00 $83.00 $37.00 $55.00 $175.00 $330.00 N/C $1.50 $2.50 $3.50 $5.00 $4.00 $6.00 $5.00 $8.50 $3.50 $5.00 $3.00 $4.50 N/C N/C $50.00 $100.00 $50.00 $100.00 $50.00 $100.00 $50.00 $100.00 $50.00 $100.00 $37.00 $55.00 $175.00 $330.00 N/C $1.50 $2.50 $3.50 $5.00 $4.00 $6.00 $5.00 $8.50 $3.50 $5.00 $3.00 $4.50 N/C N/C $50.00 $100.00 $50.00 $100.00 $50.00 $100.00 $50.00 $100.00 $50.00 $100.00 $37.00 $55.00 $175.00 $330.00 * A family is defined as a group of five (5), who reside at the same address and one (1) of which is an adult. An additional family member(s) may be added to the family membership based on the season pass rate for that individual(s) at the time of purchase. Each family member under a family membership is guaranteed admission of one (1) guest at the appropriate drop in rate. Group Rates: Group rates offer guaranteed admission for the group. In order to qualify for a group rate, the group must consist often (10) or more persons, and the session must be scheduled in advance. Please note that the number of groups may be limited each day. Staff has the authority to offer discounted daily rates for partial sessions or Renton-only events. d. Miscellaneous Rates (i) Resident regular session per person rate (ii) Non-resident regular session per person rate (iii) Resident twilight session per person rate (iv) Non-resident twilight session per person rate (v) Locker Rental: $0.25 $8.00 $13.00 $3.50 $6.00 $0.25 $8.00 $13.00 $3.50 $6.00 $0.25 $8.00 $13.00 $3.50 $6.00 $0.25 e. Canopy Rental Fees: (includes canopy and admission for one leisure swim session) (i) Henry Moses Party Tent #1 (10' x 20' for up to twenty-five (25) guests): (l) Resident Rate, per session (2) Non-resident Rate, per session (ii) Henry Moses Party Tent #2 (10'x 10'for up to fifteen (15) guests): $225.00 $350.00 $225.00 $350.00 $240.00 $370.00 Revised 11/02/10 8a. ‐ Adopting the 2011/2012 Fee Schedule Brochure (Approved via  11/1/2010 Committee of the Whole report)Page 43 of 195 PPHsWnf mr. N- . . • (i) Resident Rate (2) Non-resident Rate f. Resident Rate all inclusive g. Non-resident Rate all inclusive 2. h. Swim Lesson Program: (i) Resident swim session (eliminating sessions) (ii) Non-resident swim session (eliminating sessions) (iii) Resident swim lesson per lesson (iv) Non-resident swim lesson per lesson i. End-of-Year School Party Rentals: (i) Renton School District (i) 001 - 299 students (2) 300-399 students (3) 400 - 499 students (4) 500 - 599 students (ii) Other Schools and Districts (1) 001-299 students (2) 300 - 399 students (3) 400 - 499 students (4) 500 - 599 students Boat Launch Rates: a. Daily resident - 7 days a week b. Daily Non-resident-7 days a week c. Overnight resident - 7 days a week d. Overnight Non-resident - 7 days a week e. Annual parking permit-resident f. Annual parking permit - non-resident g. Additional sticker (parking permit) h. Fishing Tournaments at Coulon Beach (additional rental fee if using the Pavilion area for weigh in and or electricity at the current rental rate) per event •' ^tllllll $145.00 $220.00 $1,200.00 $1,200.00 N/C N/C $6.50 $8.50 $1,800.00 $2,100.00 $2,200.00 $2,400.00 $2,300.00 $2,700.00 $3,000.00 $3,200.00 $10.00 $20.00 $20.00 $40.00 $50.00 $100.00 $5.00 N/A $145.00 $220.00 $1,200.00 $1,200.00 N/C N/C $6.50 $8.50 $1,800.00 $2,100.00 $2,200.00 $2,400.00 $2,300.00 $2,700.00 $3,000.00 $3,200.00 $10.00 $20.00 $20.00 $40.00 $50.00 $100.00 $5.00 $50.00 BiiiBSI^^^B $155.00 $240.00 $1,350.00 $1,350.00 N/C N/C $6.50 $8.50 $1,900.00 $2,250.00 $2,400.00 $2,550.00 $2,450.00 $2,850.00 $3,150.00 $3,360.00 $10.00 $20.00 $20.00 $40.00 $50.00 $100.00 $5.00 $50.00 lsi^i<raisiiiiiPaiMEiiiEi 1. Non profit organizations - resident per hour (4 hour minimum) 2. All other organizations - resident per hour (4 hour minimum) 3. Non-profit organizations - non-resident per hour (4 hour minimum) 4. All other organizations - non-resident per hour (4 hour minimum) 5. Technician fees per hour 6. House Manager fees per hour 7. Lapel Mic 8. Wireless handheld mic lECTjONVll^ $90.00 $110.00 $100.00 $120.00 $25.00 $20.00 Included Included $90.00 $110.00 $100.00 $120.00 $25.00 $20.00 Included Included $100.00 $125.00 $110.00 $140.00 $30.00 $25.00 Included Included 1. Outlying Picnic Shelters (Cedar River Trail, Liberty Park, Phillip Arnold Park, Riverview Park, Teasdale Park and Heritage Park) a. Resident 8:30am-l:30pm/3:30pm-8:30pm b. Non-resident 8:30am-l:30pm/3:30pm-8:30pm c. Full day resident 8:30am-sunset under 75 people $80.00 $160.00 $120.00 $80.00 $160.00 $120.00 $90.00 $180.00 $140.00 Revised 11/02/10 8a. ‐ Adopting the 2011/2012 Fee Schedule Brochure (Approved via  11/1/2010 Committee of the Whole report)Page 44 of 195 1 w^^mmM^tstMsumsmB^mmmM iiiiiitiiiiiiiiiiiiiiBi d. Full day resident 8:30am-sunset under 76 - 100 e. Full day Non-resident 8:30am-sunset under 75 people f. Full day Non-resident 8:30am-sunset under 76 to 100 liiROjllilllt $150.00 $240.00 $300.00 2. Gene Coulon Beach Park Shelters (South #1, South #2 and Creekside) a. Resident 8:30am-l:30pm/3:30pm-8:30pm b. Non-resident 8:30am-l:30pm/3:30pm-8:30pm c. Full day resident 8:30am-sunset under 75 people d. Full day resident 8:30am-sunset under 76 -100 e. Full day Non-resident 8:30am-sunset under 75 people f. Full day Non-resident 8:30am-sunset under 76 to 100 g. South Shelters 1 & 2 Resident rate h. South Shelters 1 & 2 Non-resident rate 3. Gene Coulon Beach Park Shelters (North Shelter) a. Resident 8:30am-l:30pm/3:30pm-3:30pm b. Non-resident 8:30am-l:30pm/3:30pm-8:30pm c. Full day resident 8am-sunset under 75 people d. Full day resident 8am-sunset under 76 - 100 e. Full day Non-resident 8am-sunset under 75 people f. Full day Non-resident 8am-sunset under 76 to 100 $80.00 $160.00 $120.00 $150.00 $240.00 $300.00 $300.00 $600.00 $80.00 $160.00 $120.00 $150.00 $240.00 $300.00 4. Tennis, Basketball and Sand Volleyball court rate per hour (Tournament Play Only a. Tennis court b. Park basketball court c. Sand volleyball court 5. Catering and Event Rate (All city parks apply including the Piazza River Park) a. Resident half day b. Resident full day c. Non-resident half day d. Non-resident full day 6. Inflatable and big toy rate, each. Along with rental fee for the use of City facility for each inflatable or big toy, Applicant or Renter shall provide proof of insurance naming the City of Renton as additional insured. 7. Open Space Area in the Parks (Cascade, Teasdale, Phillip Arnold, Kennydale Lions, Sunset, and Riverview Parks) a. Resident rate per hour b. Non-resident rate per hour 8. Photo Shoots per hour a. Commercial Film and Photo Shoots per hour 9. Athletic Field Rental, Lights and Prep Fees a. Sports field rental per hour - resident b. Sports field rental per hour - non-resident c. Renton Area Youth Sports Agencies, per hour d. Field prep for softball/baseball - resident per occurrence e. Field prep soccer - resident per occurrence f. Field prep other - resident per occurrence g. Field prep for softball/baseball - non-resident per occurrence h. Field prep soccer - non-resident per occurrence N/A N/A N/A mmmmmti $150.00 $240.00 $300.00 $100.00 $180.00 $140.00 $170.00 $260.00 $320.00 $300.00 $600.00 $120.00 $240.00 $160.00 $190.00 $320.00 $380.00 $5.00 $5.00 $5.00 Hill 20I1II1B $170.00 $270.00 $350.00 $100.00 $180.00 $140.00 $170.00 $260.00 $320.00 $300.00 $600.00 $120.00 $240.00 $160.00 $190.00 $320.00 $380.00 $5.00 $5.00 $5.00 Park, Senior Center Park, Jones Park, and Cedar N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A Cedar River, Earli N/A N/A N/A N/A $17.00 $20.00 $5.00 $25.00 $35.00 Varies $30.00 $40.00 $200.00 $350.0 $400.00 $700.00 $50.00 ngton, Gene Coulc $10.00 $25.00 $40.00 $300.00 $17.00 $20.00 $5.00 $25.00 $35.00 Varies $30.00 $40.00 $200.00 $350.00 $400.00 $700.00 $50.00 >n, Glencoe, $10.00 $25.00 $40.00 $300.00 $25.00 $30.00 $6.00 $30.00 $45.00 Varies $35.00 $50.00 Revised 11/02/10 8a. ‐ Adopting the 2011/2012 Fee Schedule Brochure (Approved via  11/1/2010 Committee of the Whole report)Page 45 of 195 i. Field prep other - non-resident per occurrence j. Field lights all sports - resident per hour k. Field lights all sports - non-resident per hour 10. Banquet & Classroom Rental/Community Center & Senior Center Rental a. Friday 5 hour minimum - resident b. Weekend Rates 10 hour minimum - resident c. Extra hours - per hour-resident d. Friday 5 hour minimum - non-resident e. Weekend Rates 10 hour minimum - non-resident f. Extra hours - per hour - non-resident g. Kitchen charge - per hour h. Banquet Room - Mon - Thurs - resident/hr 3 hr minimum i. Banquet Room - Mon - Thurs - non-resident/hr 3 hr minimum j. Damage deposit - senior center/community center - resident and non-resident k. Contract violation fee - per hour 11. Classroom and Gymnasium Rental a. Resident single gym athletic - per hour b. Non-resident single gym athletic - per hour c. Resident double gym athletic - per hour d. Non-resident double gym athletic - per hour e. Resident single gym non athletic f. Non-resident single gym non athletic g. Resident double gym non athletic h. Non-resident double gym non athletic i. Carpet fee single gym - resident & non-resident j. Carpet fee double gym - resident & non-resident k. Classroom resident anytime 1. Classroom Non-resident anytime 12. Birthday Party Packages a. Preschool package - resident b. Bounce package-resident c. Sports package - resident d. Preschool package - non-resident e. Bounce package-non-resident f. Sports package - non-resident 13. Non-resident Facility Rental a. Meeting room - operating hours resident b. Meeting room - non operating hours - resident c. Gymnasium - operating hours - resident d. Gymnasium - non operating hours - resident e. Meeting room - operating hours - non-resident f. Meeting room - non operating hours - non-resident g. Gymnasium - operating hours - non-resident h. Gymnasium - non operating hours - non-resident i. Neighborhood park buildings - resident j. Neighborhood park buildings - non-resident illBlilllBll Varies $20.00 $24.00 $600.00 $1,200.00 $120.00 $700.00 $1,400.00 $140.00 $80.00 $75.00 $90.00 $500.00 $150.00 $40.00 $45.00 $80.00 $90.00 $500.00 $600.00 $1,000.00 $1,200.00 $150.00 $300.00 $30.00 $35.00 $30.00 $55.00 $40.00 $35.00 $65.00 $45.00 $30.00 $45.00 $30.00 $45.00 $35.00 $50.00 $35.00 $50.00 $30.00 $35.00 liiiiiiiiiif Varies $20.00 $24.00 $600.00 $1,200.00 $120.00 $700.00 $1,400.00 $140.00 $80.00 $75.00 $90.00 $500.00 $150.00 $40.00 $45.00 $80.00 $90.00 $500.00 $600.00 $1,000.00 $1,200.00 $150.00 $300.00 $30.00 $35.00 $30.00 $55.00 $40.00 $35.00 $65.00 $45.00 $30.00 $45.00 $30.00 $45.00 $35.00 $50.00 $35.00 $50.00 $30.00 $35.00 llBiliHBil Varies $25.00 $30.00 $660.00 $1,320.00 $135.00 $770.00 $1,540.00 $155.00 $88.00 $85.00 $99.00 $550.00 $165.00 $45.00 $50.00 $90.00 $100.00 $550.00 $660.00 $1,100.00 $1,350.00 $165.00 $330.00 $33.00 $39.00 $30.00 $65.00 $65.00 $35.00 $75.00 $75.00 $35.00 $50.00 $35.00 $50.00 $40.00 $55.00 $40.00 $55.00 $35.00 $40.00 sEMGNiaisc^wMyjsra^ One Month Pass: "Student" shall mean ages 17 and under, "Senior" shall mean ages 62 and over Revised 11/02/10 8a. ‐ Adopting the 2011/2012 Fee Schedule Brochure (Approved via  11/1/2010 Committee of the Whole report)Page 46 of 195 Bt!H;':.-" •• "• • "••"' " ' a. Resident adult b. Non-resident adult c. Resident senior/student d. Non-resident senior/student e. Resident couples f. Non-resident couples g. Resident family h. Non-resident family 2. Three Month Pass a. Resident adult b. Non-resident adult c. Resident senior/student d. Non-resident senior/student e. Resident couples f. Non-resident couples 3. Six Month Pass a. Resident adult b. Non-resident adult c. Resident senior/student d. Non-resident senior/student e. Resident couples f. Non-resident couples 4. Racquetball Pass a. Resident adult b. Non-resident adult 5. Community Center Drop In Fees a. Resident adult/senior/studentaerobics b. Non-resident aerobics c. Resident basketball d. Non-resident basketball e. Senior/student basketball f. Resident volleyball g. Non-resident volleyball h. Senior/student volleyball i. Resident fitness j. Non-resident fitness k. Senior/student fitness 1. Resident/senior/student shower pass m. Non-resident shower pass n. Resident racquetball per hour o. Non-resident racquetball per hour p. Senior/student racquetball per hour q. Resident wallyball per hour r. Non-resident wallyball per hour s. Senior/student wallyball per hour - viii— $25.00 $30.00 $20.00 $20.00 $40.00 $50.00 $60.00 $80.00 $62.00 $75.00 $50.00 $50.00 $100.00 $125.00 $112.00 $135.00 $90.00 $90.00 $180.00 $225.00 $48.00 $48.00 $6.00 $6.00 $3.00 $3.00 $2.00 $3.00 $3.00 $2.00 $3.00 $3.00 $2.00 $20.00 $20.00 $7.00 $7.00 $7.00 $10.85 $13.00 $9.75 $25.00 $30.00 $20.00 $20.00 $40.00 $50.00 $60.00 $80.00 $62.00 $75.00 $50.00 $50.00 $100.00 $125.00 $112.00 $135.00 $90.00 $90.00 $180.00 $225.00 $48.00 $48.00 $6.00 $6.00 $3.00 $3.00 $2.00 $3.00 $3.00 $2.00 $3.00 $3.00 $2.00 $20.00 $20.00 $7.00 $7.00 $7.00 $10.85 $13.00 $9.75 B^^Bffll^HB $30.00 $35.00 $25.00 $25.00 $45.00 $55.00 $70.00 $90.00 $70.00 $85.00 $55.00 $55.00 $115.00 $140.00 $125.00 $150.00 $100.00 $100.00 $200.00 $250.00 $55.00 $55.00 $6.00 $6.00 $3.00 $3.00 $2.00 $3.00 $3.00 $2.00 $3.00 $3.00 $2.00 $20.00 $20.00 $7.00 $7.00 $7.00 $10.85 $13.00 $9.75 SECTION VIII. AIRPORT CHARGES: 1. Airport Fuel Flow Charge: $.06 per gallon. 2. Hangar monthly 3. Tiedown monthly 4. Transient airplane parking daily 5. Hangar wait list, one time fee $0.06 $0.06 $420.00 $100.00 $3.00 $100.00 $0.06 $420.00 $100.00 $3.00 $100.00 Revised 11/02/10 8a. ‐ Adopting the 2011/2012 Fee Schedule Brochure (Approved via  11/1/2010 Committee of the Whole report)Page 47 of 195 $15.00 $15.00 $25.00 $25.00 $15.00 $15.00 $25.00 $25.00 $25.00 $25.00 $40.00 '$40.00 $25.00 $25.00 $40.00 $40.00 Cat a. Cat Altered b. Cat altered - qualified senior - lifetime tag (max. 3) c. Cat Unaltered d. Cat unaltered-qualified senior-lifetime tag (max. 3) 2. Dog a. Dog Altered b. Dog altered-qualified senior-lifetime tag (max. 3) c. Dog Unaltered d. Dog unaltered-qualified senior-lifetime tag (max. 3) 3. Duplicate tag 4. Additional Animal Permit, New and Annual Renewal 5. Penalty for not licensing 6. Late renewal fee 7. Life of pet license "Qualified Senior" under this section shall mean city residents sixty set forth in Section 8-5-15D and E and Section 8-4-31C of the RMC. iSEiiiiRiiiiiiiiiiiiiii 1. Building Fees: a. Building Permit Fees: Building Permit Fees are payable prior to the issuance of a building permit. $5.00 $5.00 $5.00 $50.00 $50.00 $50.00 $250.00 $250.00 $250.00 $15.00 $15.00 $15.00 Annual Annual Annual two (62) years of age or older, if income qualified as $25.00 $25.00 $40.00 $40.00 $25.00 $25.00 $40.00 $40.00.- Valuation is between: $1.00 to $500.00 $501.00 to $2,000.00: $2,001.00 to $25,000.00 $25,001.00 to $50,000.00 $50,001.00 to $100,000.00 $100,001.00 to $500,000.00 $500,001.00 to $1,000,000.00 Base& Additional FEE $28.00 $28 + $3.65 x each $100 Value $82.75+ $16.75 x each $1,000 Value $468.00 + $12.00 x each $1,000 Value $696.00 + $8.35 x each $1,000 Value $1,113.50 + $6.70 x each $1,000 Value $3,793.50 + $5.65 x each $1,000 Base& Additional FEE $28.00 $28 +$3.65 x each $100 Value $82.75+ $16.75 x each $1,000 Value $468.00 + $12.00 x each $1,000 Value $696.00 + $8.35 x each $1,000 Value $1,113.50 + $6.70 x each $1,000 Value $3,793.50 + $5.65 x each $1000 Base& Additional FEE $28.00 $28 +$3.65 x each $100 Value $82.75+ $16.75 x each $1,000 Value $468.00 + $12.00 x each $1,000 Value $696.00 + $8.35 x each $1,000 Value $1,113.50 + $6.70 x each $1,000 Value $3,793. 50 + $5.65 x each $1,000 Revised 11/02/10 8a. ‐ Adopting the 2011/2012 Fee Schedule Brochure (Approved via  11/1/2010 Committee of the Whole report)Page 48 of 195 •HS $1,000,001.00 and up BB Value $6,615.50 + $4.35 x each $1,000 Value b. Combination Building Permit Fees: Combination Building Permit fees are requi BMIIIBII Value $6,615.50 + $4.35 x each $1,000 Value BllliBMl^^BII Value $6,615.50 + $4.35 x each $1,000 Value red for each new single family residential structure, and are payable prior to the issuance of a building permit. (i) Plumbing Up to 3,000 sq. ft. (ii) Plumbing Over3,000sq.ft. (iii) Mechanical Up to 3,000 sq.ft. (iv) Mechanical Over3,000sq.ft. (v) Electrical Up to 3,000 sq. ft. (vi) Electrical Over 3,000 sq. ft. $150.00 $175.00 $150.00 $175.00 $75.00 $100.00 $150.00 $175.00 $150.00 $175.00 $75.00 $100.00 $150.00 $175.00 $150.00 $175.00 $75.00 $100.00 c. Building Plan Check Fee; In addition to the building permit fees or combination building permit fees, a plan check fee equal to sixty five percent (65%) of the permit fee will be charged ( the time of building permit application submittal. d. Demolition Permit Fee: e. State Building Code Fee: (i) All projects: (ii) Multi-family projects: (1) Each additional card: f. Electrical Permit Fees: (i) Residential Fees — Single-Family and Duplex (i) New Service - Single Family and Duplex: (a) Up to 200 AMP (b) Over 200 AMP (2) Service Changes/New Circuits - Single Family and Duplex: (a) Change up to 200 AMP (b) Change over 200 AMP (c) Any new circuits added to above price is per each up to a maximum of $45.00 (d) Minimum fee for remodel/addition of new circuits without a service charge (ii) Multi-Family, Commercial and Industrial Fees: $15.00 $4.50 $4.50 $2.00 $70.00 $80.00 $45.00 $60.00 $15.00 $45.00 (l) Fees for all types of electrical permits are based on value of work: $1.00-250.00 $250.01 -1,000.00 $1,000.01-5,000.00 $5,000.01 - 50,000.00. $50,000.01 - 250,000.00 $250,000.01 -1,000,000.00 $45.00 $45.00 + 3.3% of value $78.00 + 2.9% of value $223.00 + 1.7% of value. $1,073.00 + 1.0% of value. $3,573.00 + Dn all building permits. Payable at $15.00 $4.50 $4.50 $2.00 $70.00 $80.00 $45.00 $60.00 $15.00 $45.00 $45.00 $45.00 + 3.3% of value $78.00 + 2.9% of value $223.00 + 1.7% of value. $1,073.00 + 1.0% of value. $3,573.00 + $15.00 $4.50 $4.50 $2.00 $70.00 $80.00 $45.00 $60.00 $15.00 $45.00 $45.00 $45.00 + 3.3% of value $78.00 + 2.9% of value $223.00 + 1.7% of value. $1,073.00 + 1.0% of value. $3,573.00 + 10 Revised 11/02/10 8a. ‐ Adopting the 2011/2012 Fee Schedule Brochure (Approved via  11/1/2010 Committee of the Whole report)Page 49 of 195 •Biff* g- *_J _t* (iii) (iv) (i) (2) (3) (4) (5) $1,000,000.01 and up. Temporary Electrical Services Miscellaneous Electrical Fees Job Trailers Signs per each Swimming Pools, Hot Tubs, Saunas per each Mobile Homes Low Voltage Work (e.g., alarm systems; thermostats; computer, data, or phone lines; fiber optics, cable television, etc.) Exemption: Residential telephone communication systems, thermostats, security systems, and cable television installations are exempt from fees i • ' -"i'3HI 0.8% of value. $11,573.00 + 0.45% of value. $45.00 $45.00 $45.00 $60.00 $45.00 50% of standard fee 0.8% of value. $11,573.00 + 0.45% of value. $45.00 $45.00 $45.00 $60.00 $45.00 50% of standard fee Grade and Fill License Fees: Fees shall be based on the volume of the excavation and fill. (i) (i) (2) (3) (4) (5) (6) Grading License 50 cubic yards or less 51-100 cubic yards 101-1000 cubic yards (a) For the first 100 cubic yards (b) For each additional 100 cubic yards or fraction 1,001 -10,000 cubic yards (a) For the first 1,000 cubic yards (b) For each additional 1,000 cubic yards or fraction 10,001 -100,000 cubic yards (a) For the first 10,000 cubic yards (b) For each additional 10,000 cubic yards or fraction 100,001 or more cubic yards (a) For the first 100,000 cubic yards (b) For each additional 100,000 cubic yards or fraction In addition to the license fees, a grading plan check fee a grading licenses requiring plan review. Before accepting Development Services Division shall collect a plan checki (ii) (i) (2) (3) Grading Plan Check Fees 50 cubic yards or less 51-100 cubic yards 101 - 1,000 cubic yards $10.00 $15.00 $15.00 $7.00 $78.00 $6.00 $132.00 $27.00 $375.00 $15.00 nd a drainage pla a set of plans and ng fee. $5.00 $10.00 $15.00 $10.00 $15.00 $15.00 $7.00 $78.00 $6.00 $132.00 $27.00 $375.00 $15.00 n check fee is cha specifications for $5.00 $10.00 $15.00 liHiH5iI^BI^H 0.8% of value. $11,573.00 + 0.45% of value. $45.00 $45.00 $45.00 $60.00 $45.00 50% of standard fee $10.00 $15.00 $15.00 $7.00 $78.00 $6.00 $132.00 $27.00 $375.00 $15.00 •ged for all checking, the $5.00 $10.00 $15.00 11 Revised 11/02/10 8a. ‐ Adopting the 2011/2012 Fee Schedule Brochure (Approved via  11/1/2010 Committee of the Whole report)Page 50 of 195 BPRi h. i. j- k. -m (4) (5) (6) (7) (8) 0) (10) (11) (12) ••..-.'.' "- 1,001 -10,000 cubic yards For each additional 10,000 cubic yards For the first 100,000 cubic yards For each additional 10,000 cubic yards For the first 200,000 cubic yards For each additional 10,000 cubic yards Drainage plan check fees associated with a grading license: fee plus $1.00 for every 10,000 sq feet of land area. Solid Waste Fills: The plan check fee for solid waste fills shall be one and one-half (1-1/2) times the plan checking fees listed above. The fee for a grading license authorizing additional work to that under a valid license shall be the difference between the fee paid for the original license and the fee shown for the entire project. Annual Licenses of Solid Waste Fills: The fee for annual licenses for solid waste fills shall be one and one-half (1-1/2) times the plan checking fees listed above. The fee for a grading license authorizing additional work to that under a valid license shall be the difference between the fee paid for the original license and the fee shown for the entire project. Any unused fee may be carried forward to the next year. If any work is done before the license is issued, the grading license fee shall be doubled. House Moving - minimum per hour Inspection Fee: This covers only the Building Section inspection of the structure prior to move. There is a separate additional fee ch arged by the Public Works Department to cover the actual house move permit. A building permit is also required in order to site the structure on the new site. Inspecti on Fee For Condominium Conversions: Manufactured/Mobile Home Installation Fees: Includes plan (electrical, plumbing, mechanical, sewer and water connec (i) (ii) Within a manufactured home park Outside of a manufactured home park Mechanical Permit Fees: 0) (i) Basic permit fee plus itemized fees below: Heating system (furnace, heat pump, suspended heater, fireplace, wood stove, etc.). A/C system (air conditioner, chiller or Air Handling Unit (VAV) including ducts and vents) - ,-zmmmmmm e:;i $20.00 $10.00 $110.00 $6.00 $170.00 $3.00 $50.00 1.5 times plan check fee 1.5 times plan check fee $75.00 $100.00 1st unit +$15/addt'l unit review and inspe tion fees are in ad $100.00 Building permit fees $45.00 $17.00 $20.00 $10.00 $110.00 $6.00 $170.00 $3.00 $50.00 1.5 time plan check fee 1.5 times plan check fee $75.00 $100.00 1st unit +$15/addt'l unit ction fees for the dition to the belo $100.00 Building permit fees $45.00 $17.00 $20.00 $10.00 $110.00 $6.00 $170.00 $3.00 $50.00 1.5 times plan check fee 1.5 times plan check fee $75.00 $100.00 1st unit +$15/addt'l unit :oundation M amounts). $100.00 Building permit fees $45.00 $17.00 12 Revised 11/02/10 8a. ‐ Adopting the 2011/2012 Fee Schedule Brochure (Approved via  11/1/2010 Committee of the Whole report)Page 51 of 195 Type of Fees (2) (3) (4) (5) (6) (7) (8) (9) (10) Boiler or Compressor: Installation or relocation of $17.00 each: (a) Up to and including 3 horsepower. $17.00 (b) Over 3 horsepower up to and including 15 $30.00 horsepower. (c) Over 15 horsepower up to and including 30 $40.00 horsepower. (d) Over 30 horsepower to and including 50 $60.00 horsepower. (e) Over 50 horsepower. $100.00 Absorption System: Installation or relocation of each: (a) Up to and including 100,000 Btu/h $17.00 (b) Over 100,000 Btu/h up to and including $30.00 500,000 Btu/h (c) Over 500,000 Btu/h up to and including $40.00 1,000,000 Btu/h (d) Over 1,000,000 Btu/h up to and including $60.00 1,750,000 Btu/h (e) Over 1,750,000 Btu/h $100.00 Residential ventilation/exhaust fan $8.00 Appliance or piece of equipment regulated by this $17.00 code but not classed in other appliance categories, or for which no other fee is listed in this code Commercial ventilation/exhaust system not a $17.00 portion of any heating or air conditioning system authorized by a permit. Commercial Hood: Installation of each served by $50.00 a mechanical exhaust, including the ducts for such hood each Incinerator: Installation or relocation of each $75.00 Appliance or piece of equipment regulated by this $17.00 code but not classed in other appliance categories, or for which no other fee is listed in this code Fuel Gas Piping: Each gas-piping system of 1 to 4 $12.00 outlets (a) Each gas-piping system of 5 or more outlets, $2.50 per outlet $17.00 $17.00 $30.00 $40.00 $60.00 $100.00 $17.00 $30.00 $40.00 $60.00 $100.00 $8.00 $17.00 $17.00 $50.00 $75.00 $17.00 $12.00 $2.50 $17.00 $17.00 $30.00 $40.00 $60.00 $100.00 $17.00 $30.00 $40.00 $60.00 $100.00 $8.00 $17.00 $17.00 $50.00 $75.00 $17.00 $12.00 $2.50 Plumbing Permit Fees: (i) Base fee for all types of work; plus itemized fees below Per plumbing fixture (e.g., sink, shower, toilet, dishwasher, tub, etc.) or set of fixtures on one trap For meter to house water service Per outlet associated with a gas piping system up to 5: (a) additional outlets price per each Per drain for rainwater systems Per lawn sprinkler system, includes backflow prevention (i) (2) (3) (4) (5) $45.00 $8.00 $8.00 $12.00 $2.50 $8.00 $8.00 $45.00 $8.00 $8.00 $12.00 $2.50 $8.00 $8.00 $45.00 $8.00 $8.00 $12.00 $2.50 $8.00 $8.00 13 Revised 11/02/10 8a. ‐ Adopting the 2011/2012 Fee Schedule Brochure (Approved via  11/1/2010 Committee of the Whole report)Page 52 of 195 Type of Fees (6) Per fixture for repair or alteration of drainage or vent piping (7) Per vacuum breaker or backflow protection device on tanks, vats, etc. (8) Per interceptor for industrial waste pretreatment m. Sign Permit Fees: (i) Permanent Signs: (l) Roof, projecting, awning, canopy, marquee, and wall signs (2) Freestanding ground and pole signs (ii) Temporary and Portable Signs: (l) Real Estate Directional Signs, pursuant to RMC 4- 4-100J2, permit valid for a 12-months period (2) Grand Opening Event Signs, pursuant to RMC 4-4- 100J6d(i) (3) Event Signs, pursuant to RMC 4-4-100J6d(ii) and (iii) per sign, per promotion (4) A-Frame Signs, pursuant to RMC 4-4-100J5 Charge is for the first sign, all subsequent signs are $50.00 (5) Commercial Property Real Estate Banner each sign permit is valid for 12 months. (6) Decorative Flags fee is per entrance and valid until flag(s) are removed (iii) Request for Administrative Modifications of City Center Sign Regulations per RMC 4-4-100H9: 2010 $8.00 $8.00 $8.00 $125.00 $175.00 $50.00 $25.00 $15.00 $100.00 $50.00 $50.00 $100.00 (iv) Work in Advance of Sign Permit Issuance: Where work for which the of RMC is started or proceeded with prior to obtain ngsaid permit, th 2011 $8.00 $8.00 $8.00 $125.00 $175.00 $50.00 $25.00 $15.00 $100.00 $50.00 $50.00 $100.00 2012 $8.00 $8.00 $8.00 $125.00 $175.00 $50.00 $25.00 $15.00 $100.00 $50.00 $50.00 $100.00 permit is required by this Title IV e fees above specified shall be doubled; but the payment of such double fee shall not relieve any persons from complying with the requirements in the execution of the work nor from n. Swimming Pool/Hot Tub/Spa Installation Fees: (i) Public pool, spa, hot tub (ii) Private pool, spa, hot tub (iii) Pool filling system, including backflow prevention, each (iv) Each water heater and/or vent (v) Gas piping system, each (vi) Replacing of filter (vii) Miscellaneous replacements (viii) Backwash receptor o. Miscellaneous Fees: (i) Replacement Permit Fee: Permit copies for replacement of lost or mutilated building, demolition, grading, plumbing, electrical or mechanical permit will be furnished upon a payment of a service fee any other penalties prescribed herein. $30.00 $20.00 $2.00 $2.00 $2.00 $3.00 $3.00 $2.00 $20.00 $30.00 $20.00 $2.00 $2.00 $2.00 $3.00 $3.00 $2.00 $20.00 $30.00 $20.00 $2.00 $2.00 $2.00 $3.00 $3.00 $2.00 $20.00 14 Revised 11/02/10 8a. ‐ Adopting the 2011/2012 Fee Schedule Brochure (Approved via  11/1/2010 Committee of the Whole report)Page 53 of 195 iTfifeiiieeilii (ii) (iii) ^^^^^©^^^S^^^^^SsSM^^^^S^^^S^^W^ Re-Inspection Fees: Re-inspection fees are assessed under the provisions of Section 305.8 of the International Building Code. Re-inspection fees shall be $47.00 per hour or the total hourly cost to the jurisdiction, whichever is greatest. This cost shall include supervision, overhead, equipment, hourly wages and fringe benefits of the employees involved. Plan Review Fees for Electrical, Plumbing, or Mechanical Permits: In addition to the above permit fees, a plan check fee equal to forty percent (40%) of the permit fee may be charged when required by the Building Official. 2. Land Use Review Fees: a. General Land Use Review (i) (ii) (iii) (iv) (v) (vi) (vii) (viii) (ix) (x) (xi) (xii) (xiii) (xiv) (1) (2) (3) (4) (XV) (1) (2) (3) (xvi) (i) (2) (xvii) (1) (2) (3) (4) Additional Animals Permit (annual fee) Annexation Appeal of Hearing Examiner's Decision, Administrative Decision, or Environmental Decision Binding Site Plan (total fee for both preliminary and final phases) Code Text Amendment Comprehensive Plan Map or Text Amendment (each) Conditional Use Permit Critical Areas Review Fee: for those projects that propose impacts to critical areas and will be billed at the cost of contract biologist's review. Environmental Impact Statement Cost include the coordination, review and appeal. Draft and Final Environmental Checklist Review Fence Permit (special) Grading and Filling Permit(Hearing Examiner) Lot Line Adjustment Manufactured/Mobile Home Park: Tentative Preliminary Final Open Space Classification Request Plats: Short Plat (total fee for both preliminary and final phases) Preliminary Plat Final Plat Planned Urban Development: Preliminary Plan Final Plan Rebuild Approval Permit: Hearing Examiner Review Administrative Review Rezone Routine Vegetation Management Permit without Critical Areas iiilHSliOMilil! $47.00 40% of permit fee $50.00 N/C $250.00 $1,800.00 N/C $1,000.00 $2,000.00 100% of contract cost 100% of cost $1,000.00 $100.00 $2,000.00 $450.00 $500.00 $2,000.00 $1,000.00 $100.00 $1,400.00 $4,000.00 $1,500.00 $2,000.00 $1,000.00 $500.00 $250.00 $2,000.00 $75.00 iiiiiisiiiiiiiii $47.00 40% of permit fee $50.00 N/C $250.00 $1,800.00 N/C $1,000.00 $2,000.00 100% of contract cost 100% of cost $1,000.00 $100.00 $2,000.00 $450.00 $500.00 $2,000.00 $1,000.00 $100.00 $1,400.00 $4,000.00 $1,500.00 $2,000.00 $1,000.00 $500.00 $250.00 $2,000.00 $75.00 ••itiiaiiiiiii $47.00 40% of permit fee $50.00 N/C $250.00 $1,800.00 N/C $1,000.00 $2,000.00 100% of contract cost 100% of cost $1,000.00 $100.00 $2,000.00 $450.00 $500.00 $2,000.00 $1,0000.00 $100.00 $1,400.00 $4,000.00 $1,500.00 $2,000.00 $1,000.00 $500.00 $250.0 $2,000.00 $75.00 15 Revised 11/02/10 8a. ‐ Adopting the 2011/2012 Fee Schedule Brochure (Approved via  11/1/2010 Committee of the Whole report)Page 54 of 195 (5) (6) (7) (8) (xviii) (i) (2) (3) (4) (5) (xix) (1) (2) (3) (4) Shoreline-Related Permits Shoreline Permit N/C N/C N/C Exemption Substantial Development Permit $2,000.00 $2,000.00 $2,000.00 Conditional Use Permit $2,000.00 $2,000.00 $2,000.00 Variance $2,000.00 $2,000.00 $2,000.00 Site Development Plan (Site Plan or Master Plan which includes design review fee for projects subject to RMC 4-3-100): Hearing Examiner Review Administrative Review Modification (minor, administrative) Modification (major) required new application and repayment of fee required Special Permit (Hearing Examiner) Temporary Use Permits: Tier 1 Tier 2 Variance (per each variance requested) Administrative or Hearing Examiner Waiver or Modification of Code Requirements cost is per request $2,000.00 $1,000.00 N/C Application fees $2,000.00 $75.00 $150.00 $1,200.00 $100.00 $2,000.00 $1,000.00 N/C Application fees $2,000.00 $75.00 $150.00 $1,200.00 $100.00 $2,000.00 $1,000.00 N/C Application fees $2,000.00 $75.00 $150.00 $1,200.00 $100.00 Per RMC 4-3-050F7, the City may charge and collect fees from any applicant to cover costs incurred by the city in review of plans, studies, monitoring reports and other documents related to evaluation of impacts to or hazards from critical areas and subsequent code-required monitoring. When the City is the lead agency for a proposal requiring an Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) and the Environmental Review Committee (ERC) determines that the EIS shall be prepared, the City may charge and collect a reasonable fee from any applicant to cover costs incurred by the City in preparing the EIS. The ERC shall advise the applicant(s) of the projected costs for the EIS prior to actual preparation; the applicant shall post bond or otherwise ensure payment of such costs. The ERC may determine that the City will contract directly with a consultant for preparation of an EIS, or a portion of the EIS, and may bill such costs and expenses directly to the applicant. Such consultants shall be selected by mutual agreement of the City and applicant after a call for proposals. If a proposal is modified so that an EIS is no longer required, the ERC shall refund any fees collected under this subsection which remain after incurred costs are paid. The City may collect a reasonable fee from an applicant to cover the cost of meeting the public notice requirements of this Title relating to the applicant's proposal. The City shall not collect a fee for performing its duties as a consulted agency. The City may charge any person for copies of any document prepared under this Title, and for mailing the document, in a manner provided by chapter 42.17 RCW. Exception for Projects Vested in the County: For those projects that have vested to a land use permit under the development regulations of King County, the King County Land Use Review Fee Schedule shall apply, and is hereby adopted by reference. A copy of that fee schedule has been filed with the City Clerk and is available at the City Clerk's office for public review. 3. School Impact Fees: a. Issaquah School District (i) Single Family Fee (ii) Multi Family & Accessory Dwelling Fee b. Kent School District (i) Single Family Fee (ii) Multi Family & Accessory Dwelling Fee c. Renton School District (i) Single Family Fee (ii) Multi Family & Accessory Dwelling Fee $3,344.00 N/A $5,394.00 $3,322.00 $6,310.00 $1,258.00 $3,344.00 N/A $5,394.00 $3,322.00 $6,310.00 $1,258.00 $3,344.00 N/A $5,394.00 $3,322.00 $6,310.00 $1,258.00 16 Revised 11/02/10 8a. ‐ Adopting the 2011/2012 Fee Schedule Brochure (Approved via  11/1/2010 Committee of the Whole report)Page 55 of 195 •y 4. •iUSi Public Works Fees: a. Franchise Permit Fees: Unless otherwise specified in a franchise agreement, the fee shall be due and payable at or prior to the time of construction permit issuance. If a franchise agreement does not specify the fee amount, the generic fee, as identified in the following table, shall be collected. A bond as stipulated in RMC 9-10-5, Street Excavation Bond, is also required. Small work, including trenching less than 60 linear feet or installation of 6 or less utility poles All other work permit fee plus $60.00 per overtime hour of inspection. $350.00 $350.00 $350.00 $350.00 $350.00 $350.00 b. Latecomer's Agreement Application Fees: The processing fee is due at the time of application. The administration and collection fee is deducted from each individual latecomer fee payment and the balance forwarded to the holder of the latecomer's agreement pursuant to RMC 9-5-9, Tender of Fee. Processing fee (Nonrefundable) if amount covered by latecomers' is $20,000.00 or less Processing fee (Nonrefundable) if amount covered by latecomer's is between $20,000.00 and $100,000.00 Processing fee (Nonrefundable) if amount covered by latecomer's is greater than $100,000.00 Latecomer's Agreement - Administration and collection fee if amount covered by latecomer's is $20,000.00 or less Latecomer's Agreement - Administration and collection fee if amount covered by latecomer's is between $20,000.00 and $100,000.00 Latecomer's Agreement - Administration and collection fee if amount covered by latecomer's is greater than $100,000.00 Segregation processing fee, if applicable c. System Development Charge Tables: (i) Water and Wastewater System Development Charges: (1) 5/8 x 3/4 inch (a) Water service fee (b) Fire service fee3' (c) Wastewater fee (2) 1 inch (a) Water service fee (b) Fire service fee3' (c) Wastewater fee (3) 1-1/2 inch (a) Water service fee (b) Fire service fee8' (c) Wastewater fee (4) 2 inch (a) Water service fee (b) Fire service fee3' (c) Wastewater fee (5) 3 inch $500.00 $1,000.00 $2,000.00 15% of total 10% of total 5% of total $750.00 2,236.00 $292.00 $1,591.00 $5,589.00 $729.00 $3,977.00 $11,179.00 $1,458.00 $7,954.00 $17,886.00 $2,332.00 $12,726.00 $500.00 $1,000.00 $2,000.00 15% of total 10% of total 5% of total $750.00 2,236.00 $292.00 $1,591.00 $5,589.00 $729.00 $3,977.00 $11,179.00 $1,458.00 $7,954.00 $17,886.00 $2,332.00 $12,726.00 $500.00 $1,000.00 $2,000.00 15% of total 10% of total 5% of total $750.00 2,236.00 $292.00 $1,591.00 $5,589.00 $729.00 $3,977.00 $11,179.00 $1,458.00 $7,954.00 $17,886.00 $2,332.00 $12,726.00 17 Revised 11/02/10 8a. ‐ Adopting the 2011/2012 Fee Schedule Brochure (Approved via  11/1/2010 Committee of the Whole report)Page 56 of 195 (a) Water service fee (b) Fire service fee3' (c) Wastewater fee (6) 4 inch (a) Water service fee (b) Fire service fee3' (c) Wastewater fee (7) 6 inch (a) Water service fee (b) Fire service fee3' (c) Wastewater fee (8) 8 inch (a) Water service fee (b) Fire service fee3' (c) Wastewater fee $35,711.00 $4,665.00 $25,452.00 $55,893.00 $7,288.00 $39,768.00 $111,786.00 $14,577.00 $79,537.00 $178,857.00 $23,323.00 $127,258.00 3 Based upon the size of the fire service (NOT detector bypass meter) b Unless a separate fire service is provided, the system development charg of the meter installed and a separate fire service fee will not be charged. (ii) Storm Water System Development Charges: (l) New single family residence (including mobile/manufactured homes) (2) Addition to existing single family residence greater than 500 square feet (including mobile/manufactured homes)Fee not to exceed $1,012.00 (3) All other uses charge per square foot of new impervious surface, but not less than $1,012.00 $1,012.00 $0,405 persq foot $0,405 per sq foot d. Administrative Fees for SDC Segregation Request: The applicant shall pay the preparation, processing and recording of the partial payment of the fee( $35,711.00 $4,665.00 $25,452.00 $55,893.00 $7,288.00 $39,768.00 $111,786.00 $14,577.00 $79,537.00 $178,857.00 $23,323.00 $127,258.00 $35,711.00 $4,665.00 $25,452.00 $55,893.00 $7,288.00 $39,768.00 $111,786.00 $14,577.00 $79,537.00 $178,857.00 $23,323.00 $127,258.00 e(s) shall be based upon the size $1,012.00 $0,405 per sq foot $0,405 per sq foot $1,012.00 $0,405 persq foot $0,405 persp foot City's administrative costs for the s). At the time of application for special assessment district, and/or latecomer's charge partial payment the applicant administrative fee of $750.00 for each segregation. If the same segregation special assessment district, and/or latecomer's charge, then only one admini shall pay the is used for more than one utility's strative fee is collected. e. Public Works Construction Permit Fees: The following public works construction permit fees, utility permit fees, and miscellaneous charges are payable at or prior to the time of constructior (i) Water Construction Permit Fees: (l) Water meter tests for 3/4" to 2" meter (a) Water meter tests for meters greater than 2". Time and materials and a $60.00 deposit (b) Open and close fire hydrants for fire flow tests conducted by others. Time and materials (c) Water service disconnection (cut at main) (d) Meter resets (e) Repair of damage to service (f) Water main connections $50.00 Time and materials and a $60.00 deposit Time and materials $250.00 $95.00 $225.00 $535.00 i permit issuance. $50.00 Time and materials and a $60.00 deposit Time and materials $250.00 $95.00 $225.00 $535.00 $50.00 Time and materials and a $60.00 deposit Time and materials $250.00 $95.00 $225.00 $535.00 18 Revised 11/02/10 8a. ‐ Adopting the 2011/2012 Fee Schedule Brochure (Approved via  11/1/2010 Committee of the Whole report)Page 57 of 195 •HWI-- (g) (h) (i) (j) (k) (1) (m (2) (a) (b) (c) (d) (e) Water main cut and cap Water quality/inspection/purity tests Specialty water tests (lead, copper, etc) Cost of test plus $70.00 processing fee Water turn ons/offs after hours Installation of isolation valve. Time and materials and $2,000.00 deposit New water line chlorination fee. Fee plus $0.15 per lineal foot for any footage after the first two hundred fifty (250) lineal feet Miscellaneous water installation fees. Time and materials Water meter installation fees - City installed: Th application for water meter installation(s). 3/4" meter installed by City within City limits. Installation of stub service and meter. (i) 3/4" meter drop in only 3/4" meter installed by City outside City limits. Installation of stub service and meter. (i) 3/4" meter drop in only 1" meter installed by the City. Installation of stub service and meter (i) 1" meter drop in only 11/2" meter installed by the City. Installation of stub service and meter. (i) 1-1/2" meter drop in only 2" meter installed by the City. Installation of stub service and meter. a. 2" meter drop in only , i $1,000.00 $65.00 Cost of test plus $70.00 processing fee $185.00 Time and materials and $2,000.00 deposit $250.00 plus $0.15 per lineal foot Time and materials n $1,000.00 $65.00 Cost of test plus $70.00 processing fee $185.00 Time and materials and $2,000.00 deposit $250.00 plus $0.15 per lineal foot Time and materials $1,000.00 $65.00 Cost of test plus $70.00 processing fee $185.00 Time and materials and $2,000.00 deposit $250.00 plus $0.15 per lineal foot Time and materials e following fees are payable at the time of $2,260.00 $240.00 $2,430.00 $240.00 $2,430.00 $250.00 $3,600.00 $435.00 $4,030.00 $550.00 $2,260.00 $240.00 $2,430.00 $240.00 $2,430.00 $250.00 $3,600.00 $435.00 $4,030.00 $550.00 $2,260.00 $240.00 $2,430.00 $240.00 $2,430.00 $250.00 $3,600.00 $435.00 $4,030.00 $550.00 (3) Water meter processing fees - Applicant installed: For meters larger than 2", the applicant must provide materials and installs. The City charges a $2 app (4) (a) (b) (c) lication. Hydrant Meter fees: The following fees are paya Hydrant meter permit fee Deposits: a. 3/4" meter and backflow prevention assembly. b. 3" meter and backflow prevention assembly. c. Deposit processing charge, nonrefundable. Cost of water per ccf. 20.00 processing' Die at the time of $50.00 $300.00 $800.00 $25.00 $3.70 ee at the time of application for a h $50.00 $300.00 $800.00 $25.00 $3.70 meter ydrant meter: $50.00 $300.00 $800.00 $25.00 $3.70 19 Revised 11/02/10 8a. ‐ Adopting the 2011/2012 Fee Schedule Brochure (Approved via  11/1/2010 Committee of the Whole report)Page 58 of 195 •Bffll i (d) Meter rental begins on day of pickup. a. 3/4" meter and backflow prevention assembly. Per month. b. 3" meter and backflow prevention assembly. Per month. (ii) Wastewater and surface water construction permit (l) Residential: (a) Wastewater permit fee (b) Surface water permit fee (2) Commercial: (a) Wastewater permit fee (b) Surface water permit fee (3) Industrial: (a) Wastewater permit fee (b) Surface water permit fee (4) Repair of any of the above (a) Wastewater permit fee (b) Surface water permit fee (5) Cut and cap/Demolition permit (a) Wastewater permit fee (b) Surface water permit fee (6) Ground water discharge (temporary connection to wastewater system for one-time discharge of contaminated ground water to 50,000 gallons) (7) Ground water discharge (temporary connection to wastewater system for discharge of contaminated ground water over 50,000 gallons) Rate plus billed for current Renton and King County sewer rate on discharged amount (meter provided by property owner) (iii) Work in right-of-way - construction permit: Utility and street/sidewalk improvements: A bond is required, as stipulated in RMC 9-10-5, Street Excavation Bond. (l) Less than 35 feet in length (2) 35 to 100 feet in length (3) Greater than 100 feet in length Exception: No permit fee shall be charged for indivk for street tree or parking strip irrigation systems. (iv) Street light system fee: All new installations of stree connection to the power system, payable at or prio r~ j,;. .. $11.66 $143.67 Fees: $150.00 $150.00 $175.00 $175.00 $200.00 $200.00 $50.00 $50.00 $120.00 $120.00 $170.00 $170.00 +King County sewer rate on discharged amount $30.00 $60.00 $90.00 dual homeowners t lighting facilities "to the time of co -ij .^m $11.66 $143.67 $150.00 $150.00 $175.00 $175.00 $200.00 $200.00 $50.00 $50.00 $120.00 $120.00 $170.00 $170.00 + King County sewer rate on discharged amount $30.00 $60.00 $90.00 for work in street shall incur a fee c nstruction permit $11.66 $143.67 $150.00 $150.00 $175.00 $175.00 $200.00 $200.00 $50.00 $50.00 $120.00 $120.00 $170.00 $170.00 +King County sewer rate on discharged amount $30.00 $60.00 $90.00 rights-of-way )f $500.00 per issuance. 20 Revised 11/02/10 8a. ‐ Adopting the 2011/2012 Fee Schedule Brochure (Approved via  11/1/2010 Committee of the Whole report)Page 59 of 195 Type of Fees f. Public works plan review and inspection fees: All developers, municipal or quasi-municipal entities, or utility corporations or companies, except those specifically exempted, shall pay fees under this Section. Exempted entities include City-franchised cable TV, cable modem, natural gas, telecommunications, and electrical power. Half of this fee must be paid upon application and the remainder when the permit(s) is issued. There are additional construction permit fees which are also payable upon issuance. The fee will be based upon percentages of the estimated cost of improvements using the following formula. (i) Street and utility plan review and inspection fees; estimated construction cost: The applicant must submit separate, itemized cost estimates for each item of improvement subject to the approval by the Public Works Plan Review Section. (i) (2) (3) $150,000.00 or less Over $150,000.00 but less than $300,000.00. Fee plus 5% of the cost over $150,000.00 $300,000.00 and over. Fee plus 4% of cost $300,000.00 and over. 6% of cost $9,000.00 $16,500.00 6% of cost $9,000.00 $16,500.00 6% of cost $9,000.00 $16,500.00 Construction cost, also known as the Engineer's Estimate or the Contractor's Bid, shall mean cost estimate for all project related improvements outside of the building envelopes, including, but not limited to, all costs required to construct the following: paved parking lots, private sidewalks or walkways; private and public stormwater management facilities; temporary erosion and sedimentation control facilities; water quality facilities; public and private streets; public and private sanitary sewers; public water main improvements; required off-site street, bike and pedestrian improvements; street lighting improvements; required landscaping and street tree improvements; and site grading and mobilization costs. Release of easement fees: The imposition, collection, payment and other specifics concerning this charge are detailed in chapter 9-1 RMC, Easements, (i) Filing fee, payable at the time of application (ii) Processing fee (paid upon Council approval of release of easement) $250.00 $250.00 $250.00 $250.00 $250.00 $250.00 h. Right-of-Way use permittees: Revocable permits for the Use of Excess Public Right-of way: These fees are payable at the time of application. The imposition, collection, payment and other specifics concerning this charge are detailed in chapter 9-2 RMC, Excess Right-of Way Use. (i) Single family and two family uses annually, fee plus leasehold excise tax if applicable (ii) All uses without public benefit fee is a per month charge based on property value2 of land to be utilized, plus leasehold excise tax1, if applicable. Payable yearly in advance (iii) Uses with public benefit fee is a per year of assessed value of land adjoining the property, plus leasehold excise tax1, if applicable. In no case less than $10.00. Payable yearly in advance. $10.00 + LET1 0.5% x Value + LET1 0.5% x Value + LET1 $10.00 + LET1 0.5% x Value + LET1 0.5% x Value + LET1 $10.00 +LET1 0.5% x Value + LET1 0.5% x Value + LET1 (iv) Insurance Required: Public Liability and property damage insurance is also required pursuant to RMC 9-2-5B, Minimum Permit Requirements for Excess Right-of-Way Use. (v) Exception for Public Agencies: a no-fee permit may be issued only when the applicant is a public agency and when the proposed use of the right-of-way provides a direct service to the public (e.g., Metro applications for right-of-way for bus shelters). 21 Revised 11/02/10 8a. ‐ Adopting the 2011/2012 Fee Schedule Brochure (Approved via  11/1/2010 Committee of the Whole report)Page 60 of 195 Type of Fees ^here is hereby levied and shall be collected a leasehold excise tax on that act or privilege of occupying or using public owned real or personal property through a leasehold interest at the rate established by the State of Washington 2Right-of-way value shall be based on the assessed value of the land adjoining the property as established by the King County Assessor Street and Alley vacation Fees: The imposition, collection, payment and other specifics concerning this charge are detailed in chapter 9-14 RMC, Vacations. $500.00 $500.00 $500.00 (1) (2) (3) Filing fee, payable at the time of application Processing and completion fee, payable upon Council approval of the vacation and upon administrative determination of appraised value of vacated right-of-way: Appraised Value of Vacated right-of-way: $750.00 Less than $25,000 $25,000 to $75,000 Over $75,000 $1,250.00 $2,000.00 $750.00 $1,250.00 $2,000.00 $750.00 $1,250.00 $2,000.00 Temporary connections to a City utility system may be granted for a one-time, temporary, short-term use of a portion of the property for a period not to exceed three (3) consecutive years. (i) Storm Water Fee; Annual fee equal to ten percent (10%) of the current system development charge applicable to that portion of the property.* (ii) Wastewater Fee; Annual fee equal to ten percent (10%) of the current system development charge applicable to the size of the temporary domestic water meter(s).* (iii) Water Fee; Annual fee equal to ten percent (10%) of the current system development charge applicable to the size of the temporary water meter(s).* *Said fee shall be paid annually (non-prorated), and shall be nonrefundable, nontransferable (from one portion of the property to another) and shall not constitute a credit to the system development charge due at the time of permanent use of the utility system. The application for temporary connection shall consist of a detailed plan and a boundary line of the proposed development service area for use in the fee determination. 5. Fire Department Community Risk Reduction Fees: a. Fire plan review and inspection fees (i) $0 to $249.99 (ii) $250.00 to $999.99 fee plus 2% of the cost (iii) $1,000.00 to $4,999.99 fee plus 2% of the cost (iv) $5,000.00 to $49,999.99 fee plus 1.5% of the cost (v) $50,000.00 to $99,999.99 fee plus 1.2% of the cost (vi) $100,000.00 and above fee plus .75% of the cost Construction Re-inspection. Fee is per hour with a 2 hour minimum. The minimum may be assessed if the requested inspection does not meet the approval of the inspector. $30.00 $30.00 plus 2% of the cost $50.00 plus 2% of the cost $150.00 plus 1.5% of the cost $350.00 plus 1.2% of the cost $800.00 plus .75% of the cost $75.00 $30.00 $30.00 plus 2% of the cost $50.00 plus 2% of the cost $150.00 plus 1.5% of the cost $350.00 plus 1.2% of the cost $800.00 plus .75% of the cost $75.00 $30.00 $30.00 plus 2% of the cost $50.00 plus 2% of the cost $150.00 plus 1.5% of the cost $350.00 plus 1.2% of the cost $800.00 plus .75% of the cost $75.00 22 Revised 11/02/10 8a. ‐ Adopting the 2011/2012 Fee Schedule Brochure (Approved via  11/1/2010 Committee of the Whole report)Page 61 of 195 pum (viii) (ix) (x) (i) (2) (3) (xi) Violation/Second Re-Inspection after 30-day period (whenever 30 days or more have passed since Fire Department notification of a violation, which required a first re-inspection, and such violation has not been remedied or granted an extension) Third Re-lnspection/Pre-Citation Follow-Up Inspection when re-inspections are required beyond the first and second re-inspections Preventable Fire alarm fee; First, second, and third preventable alarms Fourth and fifth preventable alarms in a calendar year, fee is per each alarm. Sixth preventable alarm and successive preventable alarms in a calendar year, fee is per each alarm. Late Payment Penalty b. Fire Permit type (i) (ii) (iii) (iv) (v) (vi) (vii) Operational fire code permit (issued in accordance with Section 105.6 of the IFC) fee is yearly Hazardous materials and HPM facilities yearly Construction permit; 20% of the above plan review/inspection fee or minimum of $50.00, whichever is greater Replacement for lost permit, per each Hazardous production materials permit (for businesses storing, handling, or using hazardous production materials as regulated in the fire code) permit is yearly Underground tank removal permit (commercial) Underground tank removal or abandonment-in- place permit (residential) 6. Technology Surcharge Fee: An additional 3% technology surchar following Subsections of Section DD, Development Fees, of the C Subsection 1, Building Fees; Subsection 2, Land Use Review Fees, except for appeals and dire Subsections a, e, f and h of subsection 4, Public Works Fees; and Subsection a of subsection 5, Fire Department Community Risk F Iflfjlill $150.00 $250.00 N/C $70.00 $150.00 $35.00 $84.00 $150.00 $35.00 $150.00 See Fire plan review and construction permit fees $84.00 ge shall be requir ity of Renton Fee ct EIS costs; eduction Fees l|ll|ll|fl|f|; $150.00 $250.00 N/C $70.00 $150.00 $35.00 $84.00 $150.00 $35.00 $150.00 See Fire plan review and construction permit fees $84.00 ed for all fees incl Schedule Brochur i'"": •••vWM $150.00 $250.00 N/C $70.00 $150.00 $35.00 $84.00 $150.00 $35.00 $150.00 See Fire plan review and construction permit fees $84.00 jded in the e: 23 Revised 11/02/10 8a. ‐ Adopting the 2011/2012 Fee Schedule Brochure (Approved via  11/1/2010 Committee of the Whole report)Page 62 of 195 CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON, AUTHORIZING THE MAYOR AND CITY CLERK TO ENTER INTO A LEASE FOR JAIL FACILITIES WITH SCORE FOR USE OF THE CITY'S JAIL AND CERTAIN MATTERS RELATED THERETO. WHEREAS, pursuant to an Amended and Restated SCORE Interlocal Agreement, dated October 1, 2009, among the Cities of Auburn, Burien, Des Moines, Federal Way, Renton, SeaTac and Tukwila, there was formed a governmental administrative agency pursuant to RCW 39.34.030(3), known as the South Correctional Entity ("SCORE"); and WHEREAS, the SCORE facility that is being constructed in Des Moines will not be open for operation until September, 2011; and WHEREAS, prior to the opening of the new jail facility, SCORE needs to employ and train corrections personnel. To facilitate that need, SCORE will be taking over operation of the jails in the cities of Renton and Auburn on January, 1, 2011; and WHEREAS, Renton and Auburn will be leasing to SCORE their respective jail facilities and equipment for a one year period, with the option to terminate early when SCORE opens its doors. As of January 1, 2011, Renton will no longer employ jail personnel; they will become employees of SCORE; and WHEREAS, the City will not be expending funds on salaries and benefits for those employees who transfer to SCORE'S employ or the costs connected to housing inmates; and the City, correspondingly, will be collecting nominal rent; NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON, DOES RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS: 8b. ‐ Jail Facilities Lease with SCORE (See 7.a.) Page 63 of 195 RESOLUTION NO. SECTION I. The above recitals are found to be true and correct in all respects. SECTION II. The Mayor and City Clerk are hereby authorized to enter into a lease for jail facilities with SCORE. PASSED BY THE CITY COUNCIL this day of , 2010. Bonnie I. Walton, City Clerk APPROVED BY THE MAYOR this day of , 2010. Approved as to form: Lawrence J. Warren, City Attorney RES.1485:10/28/10:scr Denis Law, Mayor 8b. ‐ Jail Facilities Lease with SCORE (See 7.a.) Page 64 of 195 CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON ORDINANCE NO. AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON, AMENDING SUBSECTION 2-9-6C, PENALTIES, OF CHAPTER 9, PARKS COMMISSION, OF TITLE II (BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS) AND CHAPTER 18, PENAL CODE, OF TITLE VI (POLICE REGULATIONS), TO AMEND AND CODIFY CRIMINAL VIOLATIONS OF PARK RULES AND REGULATIONS. THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON, DOES ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS: SECTION I. Subsection 2-9-6C, Penalties, of Chapter 9, Parks Commission, of Title II (Boards and Commissions) of Ordinance No. 4260 entitled "Code of General Ordinances of the City of Renton, Washington" is hereby amended as follows: C. Penalties: Those parks rules and regulations identified as criminal violations are punishable pursuant to City Code Section 6-18-20 1-3-1. Those parks rules and regulations identified as civil violations are punishable pursuant to City Code Section 1-3-2. SECTION II. Chapter 6-18, Penal Code, of Title VI (Police Regulations), of Ordinance No. 4260 entitled "Code of General Ordinances of the City of Renton, Washington", is hereby amended to add a new section 20, entitled "Park Rules and Regulations Violations" to read as shown below. The current sections 20, Violation - Penalty, and 21, Severability, shall be renumbered as sections 21 and 22 respectively. 6-18-20 PARK RULES AND REGULATIONS VIOLATIONS: A. Posting of Signs: Except as authorized by the Administrator, it is unlawful to use, place or erect any signboard, sign, billboard, bulletin board, post, pole or 8a. ‐ Criminal violations of Park Rules & Regulations (See 7.b.) Page 65 of 195 ORDINANCE NO. device of any kind for advertising in any park: or to attach any notice bill, poster, sign, wire, rod, or cord to any tree, shrub, railing, post or structure within any park; or to place or erect in any park, a structure of any kind. B. Park Closing: Unless otherwise posted, it is unlawful to remain in any park after the posted closing time, except when engaged in activities, programs or events scheduled by the Community Services Department. C. Weapons & Fireworks: Except as otherwise permitted by law, it is unlawful for a person to possess in any park, any fireworks, firecracker, torpedo, explosive, air gun, bow and arrow(s), BB gun, paint ball gun, or slingshot. P. Alcohol: It is unlawful to possess or consume alcoholic beverages in any park except in areas designated by the Parks Commission. Designated areas are 1) Maplewood Golf Course, when such beverages are purchased and consumed within the concessionaire's licensed premises: 2) and designated areas of the Renton Community Center and Renton Senior Activity Center facilities as part of a facilitv rental. All activities shall comply with all Washington State Liquor Control Board requirements. E. Swimming Areas: It is unlawful for any person to disregard or disobey rules, signs or lifelines designating swimming areas. It is unlawful to swim in any area outside the designated swimming area. It is unlawful to disregard or disobey the instruction of lifeguards, facilitv managers, or other authorized Community Services Department employees. It is unlawful to give or transmit a false signal or false alarm of drowning. 8a. ‐ Criminal violations of Park Rules & Regulations (See 7.b.) Page 66 of 195 ORDINANCE NO. F. Overweight Vehicles in Parks: It is unlawful for any vehicle with a gross weight of over thirty-two thousand (32,000) pounds or a maximum width of over one hundred two (102) inches to use the road in any park of the city except for places set apart for such purposes by the Parks Commission and designated by signs. G. Wildlife Feeding & Harassment: It is unlawful in any manner to tease, annoy, disturb, molest, catch, injure or kill, throw any stone or missile of any kind at or strike with any stick or weapon, any animal, bird, or fowl in any manner; or to feed any fowl or bird in any park. H. Concessions, Sales, Commercial Activities, Distribution & Posting Pamphlets: It is unlawful to perform the following activities in a park area unless authorized in writing by the Administrator: 1. Operating a fixed or mobile concession, or traveling exhibition. 2. Soliciting, selling, offering for sale, peddling, hawking, or vending any goods or services. 3. Advertising any goods or services other than the direct handing of written advertising to any one person. 4. Conducting classes or organized competitions. 5. Distributing any commercial circular notice, leaflet, pamphlet or printed material of any kind in any Community Services buildings. 6. Entering upon, using or traversing any portion of a park for commercial purpose, including fund raising and/or fund solicitation. 8a. ‐ Criminal violations of Park Rules & Regulations (See 7.b.) Page 67 of 195 ORDINANCE NO. 7. Attaching or securing to any vehicle or structure any commercial circular notice, leaflet, pamphlet or printed material of any kind. I. Water Craft: It is unlawful to have, keep or operate any boat, float, raft or other water craft in or upon any bay, lake, slough, river or creek, within the limits of any park, or to land the same at any point upon the shores thereof, except at places set apart for such purposes by the Parks Commission and so designated by signs. J. Domestic Animals in Parks: 1. It is unlawful to allow or permit any domestic animal, including service animals, to run at large in any park, or enter any swimming area, pond or fountain therein. It is unlawful to keep a dog that is brought into or kept in a park area on a leash more than eight (8) feet in length. Exceptions to leash requirements may be made only for approved scheduled events. 2. It is unlawful for a person to have in his or her possession a domestic animal, except for service animals, in any park or park facilitv that permits swimming. For purposes of this section all of Gene Coulon Park, Kennydale Beach Park, and the beach at Cedar River Park will be considered a facilitv that permits swimming. 3. It is unlawful for any person with a dog or other pet in their possession in any park to fail to remove from the park feces deposited by such animal. It is unlawful for any person with a dog or other pet to fail to have in their possession the equipment or supplies required for feces removal. 8a. ‐ Criminal violations of Park Rules & Regulations (See 7.b.) Page 68 of 195 ORDINANCE NO. 4. It is unlawful for any person to have in his or her possession an animal, except for service animals, while in attendance at a special event or in a location where animals have been prohibited by the Parks Commission. 5. It is unlawful to bring onto the premises of the Maplewood Golf Course any domestic animals, except for service animals. K. Authority to Remove Persons in Parks: It shall be unlawful to stay in a park when directed to leave by an authorized Community Services Department employee or any police officer. L. Vandalism: It is unlawful to remove, destroy, mutilate or deface any structure, monument, statue, vase, fountain, wall fence, railing, vehicle, bench, shrub, tree, fern, plant, flower, lighting system or sprinkling system, or other property lawfully in any park. M. Littering: 1. It is unlawful to throw or deposit any refuse or other material in any park, except in designated receptacles, or to take garbage or refuse generated outside a park to a park for disposal. 2. It is unlawful to dump yard waste, litter, debris in any park Failure to remove from the park or properly dispose of party decorations, including, but not limited to, pinatas, streamers, or balloons, or picnic items, including, but not limited to, paper or plastic plates or cups or table coverings, shall constitute littering and is unlawful. N. Noise Restrictions: 8a. ‐ Criminal violations of Park Rules & Regulations (See 7.b.) Page 69 of 195 ORDINANCE NO. 1. It is unlawful to play car stereos, radios, or "boom boxes" - portable audio equipment, such as tape or compact disc players - so loudly they interfere with normal conversations or cause annoying vibrations at a distance of seventy-five (75) feet or more. 2. It is unlawful to operate or use any loudspeaker or other mechanical means of amplifying sound in any park without a written permit. 0. Conduct: 1. It is unlawful to use abusive, vile, profane, or obscene language or threats, which interfere with the reasonable use of a park by the general public. 2. It is unlawful to engage in acts of violence, including but not limited to fights of any kind, or to act in a violent, threatening, intimidating, or hostile manner toward another person whereby such person is put in reasonable fear for his/her safety. P. Lost Property: It is unlawful for any person to fail to turn in any property or objects found on any park premises to the park staff or directly to the office of the Police Department, at City Hall, Renton, Washington. Q. Introduction of Foreign Matter: It is unlawful to construct any structure, wall, fence, footing, drive, walk, steps, or path on park property, or to deposit invasive plants onto park property, or to use or maintain park property as an extension of private property. R. Additional Violations: 8a. ‐ Criminal violations of Park Rules & Regulations (See 7.b.) Page 70 of 195 ORDINANCE NO. Any violation of state criminal laws or the criminal laws of the City of Renton constitutes a violation of these Rules and Regulations. SECTION III. This ordinance shall be effective upon its passage, approval, and thirty (30) days after publication. PASSED BY THE CITY COUNCIL this day of , 2010. Bonnie I. Walton, City Clerk APPROVED BY THE MAYOR this day of , 2010. Approved as to form: Lawrence J. Warren, City Attorney Date of Publication: ORD:1645:ll/l/10:scr Denis Law, Mayor 8a. ‐ Criminal violations of Park Rules & Regulations (See 7.b.) Page 71 of 195 CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON ORDINANCE NO. AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON, ESTABLISHING THE PROPERTY TAX LEVY FOR THE YEAR 2011 FOR GENERAL CITY OPERATIONAL PURPOSES AND INCREASING THE LEVY AMOUNT BY ONE PERCENT (1%) OF THE LEGALLY PERMISSIBLE TAX LEVY FROM 2010. WHEREAS, the City Council has met and considered the City's budget for the calendar years 2011 and 2012; and WHEREAS, the City Council, after hearing and duly considering all relevant evidence and testimony presented, determined that in order to discharge the expected expenses and obligations of the City and in its best interest, the City requires a regular levy in the amount of thirty-two million three hundred thirty thousand dollars ($32,330,000), which includes an increase in property tax revenue from the following sources: a) an increase from the previous year of one percent (1%), b) the amounts resulting from the addition of new construction and improvements to property, c) any increase in the value of state-assessed property, d) the amounts authorized by law as a result of any annexations that have occurred, and e) relevy of any refunds made; NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON, DOES ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS: SECTION I. The regular property tax levy is hereby authorized for the 2011 levy in the amount of thirty-two million three hundred thirty thousand dollars ($32,330,000), which is an increase of one percent (1%) from the previous year plus the amount for new construction and annexations. 8b. ‐ Establishing property tax levy rate for 2011 (Approved via  11/1/2010 Committee of the Whole report)Page 72 of 195 ORDINANCE NO. This increase includes revenue resulting from the following sources: a) an increase from the previous year of one percent (1%), b) the amounts resulting from the addition of new construction and improvements to property, c) any increase in the value of state-assessed property, and d) the amounts authorized by law as a result of any annexations that have occurred, and e) relevy of any refunds made. SECTION II. This ordinance shall be effective upon its passage, approval, and five (5) days after publication. PASSED BY THE CITY COUNCIL this day of. ., 2010. Bonnie I. Walton, City Clerk APPROVED BY THE MAYOR this day of. ., 2010. Approved as to form: Lawrence J. Warren, City Attorney Denis Law, Mayor Date of Publication: ORD:1680:10/25/10:scr 8b. ‐ Establishing property tax levy rate for 2011 (Approved via  11/1/2010 Committee of the Whole report)Page 73 of 195 CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON ORDINANCE NO. AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON, AMENDING SECTION 5-11-1, UTILITY TAX, OF CHAPTER 11, UTILITY TAX, OF TITLE V (FINANCE AND BUSINESS REGULATIONS) OF ORDINANCE NO. 4260 ENTITLED "CODE OF GENERAL ORDINANCES OF THE CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON", TO AMEND THE UTILITY TAX RATE IMPOSED ON WATER UTILITY ENTERPRISES. WHEREAS, the City's Water Utility maintains and operates fire hydrant services, which are used by the City's Fire Department to provide local fire protection service; and WHEREAS, pursuant to the Washington State Supreme Court decision Lane v. City of Seattle, 164 Wn.2d 875, 194 P.3d 977 (2008), the City's Water Utility Enterprise Fund must begin charging the City's General Fund for the costs of providing fire hydrant services; and WHEREAS, imposing an additional tax of one and one-half percent (1.5%) on the gross receipts of the Water Utility Enterprise Fund will raise approximately the amount of revenue needed to pay for the projected costs of providing fire hydrant services to the City; and WHEREAS, this state law allows a city council to raise taxes on city-operated utilities to carry out city business; NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON, DOES ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS: SECTION I. Subsection 5-11-1G, Water and Sewer Utilities Tax, of Chapter 11, Utility Tax, of Title V (Finance and Business Regulations) of Ordinance No. 4260 entitled "Code of General Ordinances of the City of Renton, Washington", is hereby amended to change the title to "Sewer Utilities Tax", and as follows: 8c. ‐ Increasing water utilities tax (Approved via 11/1/2010 Committee  of the Whole report)Page 74 of 195 ORDINANCE NO. G. Wator and Sewer Utilities Tax: Upon any business enterprise engaging in or carrying on the business of selling, furnishing, or distributing wator, sanitary sewer7 or storm sewer services for commercial or domestic use or purpose within the Renton City limits, a tax equal to six percent (6%) of the total gross income from such business in the City shall be charged effective as of January 1, 1991. SECTION II. Section 5-11-1, Utility Tax, of Chapter 11, Utility Tax, of Title V (Finance and Business Regulations) of Ordinance No. 4260 entitled "Code of General Ordinances of the City of Renton, Washington", is hereby amended to add a new subsection J, to be entitled "Water Utilities Tax", and to read as follows: J. Water Utilities Tax: Upon the Water Utility Enterprise Fund engaging in or carrying on the business of selling, furnishing, or distributing water services for commercial or domestic use or purpose within the Renton City limits, a tax equal to seven and one-half percent (7.5%) of the total gross income from such business in the City shall be charged. SECTION III. This ordinance is subject to referendum under RMC Section 1-2-2. SECTION IV. This ordinance shall be effective on January 1, 2011. PASSED BY THE CITY COUNCIL this day of , 2010. Bonnie I. Walton, City Clerk 8c. ‐ Increasing water utilities tax (Approved via 11/1/2010 Committee  of the Whole report)Page 75 of 195 ORDINANCE NO. APPROVED BY THE MAYOR this day of , 2010. Approved as to form: Lawrence J. Warren, City Attorney Date of Publication: ORD:1681:10/28/10:scr Denis Law, Mayor 8c. ‐ Increasing water utilities tax (Approved via 11/1/2010 Committee  of the Whole report)Page 76 of 195 CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON ORDINANCE NO. AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON, ADOPTING THE BIENNIAL BUDGET FOR THE YEARS 2011/2012, IN THE AMOUNTS OF $224,863,236 AND $219,932,000, RESPECTIVELY. WHEREAS, the City of Renton has met and considered its budget for the calendar years 2011 and 2012; and WHEREAS, the City Council conducted public hearings for the purpose of accepting testimony related to the 2011/2012 biennial budget on November 1, 2010, and again on November 15, 2010; NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON, DOES ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS: SECTION I. After due notice and public hearing thereon as provided by law, the biennial budget for the City of Renton for the years 2011/2012, previously prepared and filed with the City Clerk, as modified hereby, is hereby ratified, confirmed and adopted, in all respects, as such biennial budget for the years 2011/2012. Such biennial budget is detailed in Attachment A, 2011/2012 Biennial Budget Summary by Fund -All Funds, which is incorporated herein as if fully set forth. SECTION II. Attachment A defines the total sums authorized and allowed for expenditures and establishes such sums in each of the funds in the 2011/2012 biennial budget. SECTION III. Acts pursuant to this ordinance, but prior to its passage or effective date, are hereby ratified and confirmed. 8d. ‐ 2011/2012 City of Renton biennial budget (Approved via 11/1/2010  Committee of the Whole report)Page 77 of 195 ORDINANCE NO. SECTION IV. A copy of the 2011/2012 biennial budget, as herein adopted, shall be transmitted to the Office of the State Auditor, Division of Municipal Corporations, and such other governmental agencies as provided by law. SECTION V. This ordinance shall be effective upon its passage, approval, and five (5) days after publication. PASSED BY THE CITY COUNCIL this day of , 2010. Approved as to form: Lawrence J. Warren, City Attorney Date of Publication: ORD:1679:ll/5/10:scr Bonnie I. Walton, City Clerk APPROVED BY THE MAYOR this day of , 2010. Denis Law, Mayor 8d. ‐ 2011/2012 City of Renton biennial budget (Approved via 11/1/2010  Committee of the Whole report)Page 78 of 195 ORDINANCE NO. ATTACHMENT A 20 Fund/ Department 000 GENERAL 001 COMMUNITYSERVICES 003 STREETS 004 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANT 005 MUSEUM 006 LIBRARY 009 FARMERS MARKET 010 FIRE AND EMERGENCYSVC MEMORIAL Oil FIRE AND EMERGENCYSVC HEALTH &WELLI* 031 PARK MEMORIAL 201 1997LIMGOBONDS-CITYHALL 215 GENERAL GOVERNMENT MISC DEBT SVC General Governmental 102 ARTERIAL STREETS 108 LEASED CITY PROPERTIES 110 SPECIAL HOTEL-MOTEL TAX 118 CUM 2755 (PATHS/TRAILS) 125 ONE PERCENT FOR ART 127 CABLE COMMUNICATIONS DEVELOPMENT 135 SPRINGBROOK WETLANDS BANK 303 COMMUNITYSERVICES IMPACTMITIGATION 304 FIREIMPACTMITIGATION 305 TRANSPORTATION IMPACTMITIGATION 316 MUNICIPAL FACILITIES CIP 317 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT 318 SOUTH LAKEWAINFRASTRUCTUREPROJECT 326 HOUSING OPPORTUNITY 402 AIRPORTOPERATIONS 403 SOLID WASTE UTILITY 404 MUNICIPAL GOLF COURSESYSTEM 405 WATER OPERATIONS 406 WASTEWATER OPERATIONS 407 SURFACEWATER OPERATIONS 416 KING COUNTY METRO 422 AIRPORT CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT 424 MUNICIPAL GOLF COURSESYSTEM CIP 425 WATER CIP 426 WASTEWATER CIP 427 SURFACEWATER CIP 461 WATERWORKS BOND RESERVE 471 WATERWORKS RATE STABILIZATION 501 EQUIPMENTRENTAL 502 INSURANCE 503 INFORMATION SERVICES 504 FACILITIES 505 COMMUNICATIONS 512 HEALTHCARE INSURANCE 522 LEOFF1 RETIREES HEALTHCARE 611 FIREMENS PENSION All Other Funds TOTAL ALL FUNDS 111/2012 BIEI Estimated Beg Fund Bal 9,491,809 50,000 50,000 (6,121) 63,206 0 70,541 936 4,303 175,067 49,999 101,449 10,051,188 200,687 995,638 247,828 3,264 128,796 88,718 459,528 1,126,594 1,903,522 557,134 3,455,517 1,060,648 38 1,653 1,331,290 326,034 '714,988 4,050,493 1,177,901 1,590,108 46,505 379,669 135,024 812,275 (2) 1 0 15,604 4,810,713 5,156,987 911,613 470,449 283,929 3,986,112 2,807,251 4,082,340 43,318,851 $ 53,370,039 SINIAL BUDGE T SUMMARY 2011 Proposed 2012 Proposed Revenue 71,689,933 10,817,691 8,391,801 304,000 195,966 2,030,000 52,500 - 25,000 - 1,983,075 2,731,960 98,221,926 620,000 744,933 245,000 - 15,000 85,000 - 60,000 100,000 250,000 13,310,000 10,657,819 - - 636,214 15,015,942 2,483,545 9,680,689 4,896,139 5,155,153 13,156,760 2,803,204 100,000 4,500,000 3,790,000 3,650,000 - - 3,211,401 3,178,883 4,029,664 4,243,673 953,941 11,248,058 2,235,684 300,000 121,356,702 $219,578,628 Revenue 72,918,112 11,149,285 8,629,064 304,000 216,220 1,030,000 60,500 - 25,000 - 1,982,075 3,749,298 100,063,554 630,000 971,049 265,000 - 15,000 85,000 - 60,000 100,000 150,000 8,560,000 9,711,400 - - 562,637 15,004,692 2,483,545 11,106,460 5,853,574 5,469,223 13,209,387 4,574,534 100,000 5,200,000 3,250,000 3,500,000 - - 3,079,893 3,187,593 4,118,173 4,324,987 974,307 12,014,224 2,235,684 300,000 121,096,362 $ 221,159,916 3 BY FUND - fi iLL FUNDS 2011 Proposed 2012 Proposed Expenditure 72,568,621 10,742,324 8,293,144 304,000 208,407 2,030,000 47,875 - 25,000 - 1,983,075 2,731,960 98,934,407 620,000 614,457 245,000 - 50,000 85,674 - 400,000 529,056 499,494 14,962,000 11,647,819 - - 1,125,756 14,951,710 2,504,738 10,107,179 4,831,929 4,865,850 13,156,760 2,803,204 100,000 4,500,000 3,790,000 3,650,000 - - 3,195,267 3,293,564 4,513,461 4,256,261 957,746 10,844,696 2,261,732 565,475 125,928,829 $ 224,863,236 Expenditure 72,387,839 11,069,028 8,536,436 304,000 215,502 1,030,000 49,150 - 25,000 - 1,982,075 3,749,298 99,348,329 630,000 876,232 265,000 - 50,000 85,674 - - 536,926 400,000 8,970,000 9,761,400 - - 1,163,846 14,972,362 2,542,204 10,302,480 4,817,627 4,941,632 13,209,387 4,954,203 100,000 5,200,000 3,250,000 3,500,000 - - 2,535,156 2,930,079 4,409,226 4,379,434 991,015 11,996,739 2,262,573 550,475 120,583,671 $ 219,932,000 Budgeted Increase (Decrease) in Fund Balance (348,417) 155,624 191,285 - (11,723) - 15,975 - - - - - 2,744 - 225,293 - - (70,000) (1,348) - (280,000) (865,982) (499,494) (2,062,000) (1,040,000) - - (1,090,750) 96,561 (79,853) 377,490 1,100,157 816,894 - (379,669) - - - - - - 560,871 142,833 (774,850) (67,035) (20,513) 420,847 (52,937) (515,950) (4,059,435) $ (4,056,692) Ending Fund Balance 9,143,392 205,624 241,285 (6,121) 51,483 0 86,516 936 4,303 175,067 49,999 101,449 10,053,932 200,687 1,220,930 247,828 3,264 58,796 87,370 459,528 846,594 1,037,540 57,640 1,393,517 20,648 38 1,653 240,540 422,596 635,135 4,427,983 2,278,059 2,407,002 46,505 (0) 135,024 812,275 (2) 1 0 15,604 5,371,584 5,299,821 136,763 403,414 263,416 4,406,959 2,754,314 3,566,390 39,259,415 $ 49,313,347 8d. ‐ 2011/2012 City of Renton biennial budget (Approved via 11/1/2010  Committee of the Whole report)Page 79 of 195 I5f MA^djyfVtf //-P-JV/O CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON ORDINANCE NO. AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON, AMENDING SUBSECTIONS 4-8-070H.1, AUTHORITY, 4-8-080G, LAND USE PERMIT PROCEDURES, AND 4-8-120C, LAND USE PERMIT SUBMITTAL, OF CHAPTER 8, PERMITS - GENERAL AND APPEALS, SECTION 4-9-240, TEMPORARY USE PERMITS, OF CHAPTER 9, PERMITS - SPECIFIC, AND CHAPTER 11, DEFINITIONS, OF TITLE IV (DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS) OF ORDINANCE NO. 4260 ENTITLED "CODE OF GENERAL ORDINANCES OF THE CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON", TO AMEND THE REGULATIONS RELATING TO TEMPORARY HOMELESS ENCAMPMENTS AND TEMPORARY USE PERMITS AND ADD DEFINITIONS FOR "HOMELESS ENCAMPMENT" AND "TEMPORARY HOMELESS ENCAMPMENT". THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON, DOES ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS: SECTION I. Subsection 4-8-070H.1, Authority, of Chapter 8, Permits - General and Appeals, of Title IV (Development Regulations) of Ordinance No. 4260 entitled "Code of General Ordinances of the City of Renton, Washington", is hereby amended to add a new subsection 4- 8-070H.1.O to read as shown below. The remaining subsections shall be re-lettered as 4-8- 070H.l.p and 4-8-070H.l.q, respectively. o. Temporary use permits, Tier III Temporary Homeless Encampments, SECTION II. Subsection 4-8-080G, Land Use Permit Procedures, of Chapter 8, Permits - General and Appeals, of Title IV (Development Regulations) of Ordinance No. 4260 entitled "Code of General Ordinances of the City of Renton, Washington", is hereby amended so the Type III section has a new row entitled Temporary Use Permits inserted, to read as follows: Temporary Use Permits: Tier III Temporary Homeless Encampments Yes Staff MI MI CC SC 8a. ‐ Temporary Homeless Encampments & Temporary Use Permits Code  Amendments ‐ Title IV Docket #D‐09 & #D‐37 (1st reading 11/8/2010)Page 80 of 195 ORDINANCE NO. SECTION III. Subsection 4-8-120C, Table 4-8-120C - Land Use Permit Submittal Requirements, of Chapter 8, Permits - General and Appeals, of Title IV (Development Regulations) of Ordinance No. 4260 entitled "Code of General Ordinances of the City of Renton, Washington", is hereby amended to add a new submittal requirement in alphabetical order to the list in the left hand column entitled "King County Health Department Approval (for food related uses only)" with a number 2 placed in the Temporary Use Permit column; and to add a new submittal requirement to the list in the left hand column entitled "Justification for Tier 3 Temporary Use Permit" with a number 5 placed in the Temporary Use Permit column. A number 9 in superscript shall be added next to the Type of Application name "Temporary Use Permit". There shall also be added a new note 9 to the Legend, to read as follows: 9. The only submittal requirements required for Tier I Temporary Use Permit are Master Application, Site Plan, and King County Health Department Approval. SECTION IV. Section 4-9-240, Temporary Use Permits, of Chapter 9, Permits - Specific, of Title IV (Development Regulations) of Ordinance No. 4260 entitled "Code of General Ordinances of the City of Renton, Washington", is hereby amended as follows: 4-9-240 TEMPORARY USE PERMITS: A. PURPOSE: A temporary use permit allows a use or structure on private or public property on a short-term basis. Such uses or structures may be allowed subject to modified development standards which would not be appropriate for permanent uses in the zoning designation. B. APPLICABILITY: 8a. ‐ Temporary Homeless Encampments & Temporary Use Permits Code  Amendments ‐ Title IV Docket #D‐09 & #D‐37 (1st reading 11/8/2010)Page 81 of 195 ORDINANCE NO. The standards in this section will be used for temporary activities characterized by their short-term or seasonal nature. Temporary uses include construction trailers, parking lot sales, temporary carnivals and fairs, mobile food vendors, and seasonal sales such as Christmas tree sales. Temporary uses regulated by this section are uses determined by the City not to be special events as defined by RMC 5-22 where considerable participation and/or spectators would have a significant impact on transportation, public services, or public safety. C. EXEMPTIONS: 1. Exemptions for Construction-related Activities: The following uses and structures do not require a temporary use permit provided they are associated with an approved land use application and/or an active building or construction permit and approved by the Administrator or designee: a. Contractor's office, storage yard, and equipment parking and servicing on or near the site or in the vicinity of an active construction project. b. One model home located on an existing lot, and located within the subdivision or residential development to which it pertains. c. Sales/marketing trailers used for the purpose of real estate sales and/or rental information, located within the subdivision or development to which they pertain. 8a. ‐ Temporary Homeless Encampments & Temporary Use Permits Code  Amendments ‐ Title IV Docket #D‐09 & #D‐37 (1st reading 11/8/2010)Page 82 of 195 ORDINANCE NO. 2. Exemptions for City-Sponsored Events: The following uses are exempt from permit requirements: City-sponsored community fairs, festivals, or events, subject to the approval of the Mayor's office. 3. Exemptions for Special Sales and Ancillary Events Promoting and Located on the Site of an Existing Permanent Business and Not Requiring a Separate Business License: If determined by the Planning Director to be of limited duration with minimal impact on neighboring properties, such special sales/events shall not require issuance of a Temporary Use Permit but may require a permit from the Fire Prevention Bureau and/or King County Health Department. 2D. TEMPORARY USE PERMITS ARE REQUIRED FOR Qtfeef OTHER TEMPORARY Usos or Structures USES OR STRUCTURES: The following uses or structures are separated into Tier \L ond Tier II, and Tier III temporary use categories. Those in the Tier I category are processed as Type I land use applicationSi and those in the Tier II category are processed as Type II applications, and those in Tier III category are processed as Type III applications. Tho Administrator or dosignoo shall consider the following factors in determining the tior level for oach activity: consistency with tho underlying zono, impact on surrounding zones, length of period of time for duration of activity, and hours of operation. Projects subject to SEPA are processed differently. al. Tier I: Examples of temporary uses in this category include activities allowed by the base zone, mobile food vendors located in the IL, IM, IH, CA, CV 8a. ‐ Temporary Homeless Encampments & Temporary Use Permits Code  Amendments ‐ Title IV Docket #D‐09 & #D‐37 (1st reading 11/8/2010)Page 83 of 195 ORDINANCE NO. and CD zones, vehicle sales events held on property not currently used as an auto dealership and within the Automall Area and/or Employment Area Valley, Christmas tree lots, ancillary sales events not determined to be exempt per Section 4-9-240B3, and a temporary manufactured home for medical hardship. The Administrator or designee may authorize additional temporary uses not listed in this subsection when it is found that the proposed uses are in keeping with the intent and purposes of this Section. fe-2. Tier II: Examples of temporary uses in this category include activities limited or prohibited by the base zone, mobile food vendors not located in the IL, IM, IH, CA, CV and CD zones, and storage trailers. Other uses in this category include circuses, carnivals, fairs, or similar transient amusement or recreational activities. Also included are model homes, equaling the lesser of five (5) homes or twenty percent (20%) of the total lots, when located within the subdivision or residential development to which they pertain. The Administrator or designee may authorize additional temporary uses not listed in this subsection when it is found that the proposed uses are in keeping with the intent and purposes of this Section. 3. Tier III: Temporary Homeless Encampments is the use in this category, and shall have an application fee of $100. E. CRITERIA FOR DETERMINING PERMIT TYPE: The Administrator or designee shall consider the following factors in determining the tier level for each activity: consistency with the underlying zone, impact on surrounding zones, length of 8a. ‐ Temporary Homeless Encampments & Temporary Use Permits Code  Amendments ‐ Title IV Docket #D‐09 & #D‐37 (1st reading 11/8/2010)Page 84 of 195 ORDINANCE NO. period of time for duration of activity, and hours of operation. Projects subject to SEPA are processed differently. C. ADDITIONAL CONDITIONS FOR VEHICLE SALES EVENTS AND MOBILE FOOD VENDORS: 1. Vehicle Sales Events hold on property not currently used as an auto dealership: Only for properties in tho Automall as shown in RMC 4-3 040 or tho Employment Aroa Valley (EAV) land uso designation arc oligiblo for a temporary use permit. Additionally, no moro than one vehicle salos event shall bo allowed por quarter of tho year (year beginning January—1st]—por property or dovolopmont as determined by tho Community and Economic Dovolopmont Administrator or designee. The use must bo allowed by tho zono district. Further, each such event shall only bo permitted for a maximum of seven (7) consecutive days per quarter. Such salos are not permissible outsido of tho Automall and Employment Aroa Valley and aro not eligible for a Temporary Uso Permit. 2. Mobile Food Vendors: Vendors shall comply with all standards established by the Seattle King County Health Dopartmont. In addition in tho IL, IM, IH, CA, CV and CD zones, no licensed vending unit shall remain at tho permitted location between 12:00 a.m. (midnight) and 5:00 a.m. on a daily basis, oxcopt for a special event where a unit is allowed at tho same location for up to seventy two (72) hours. OF. SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS AND APPLICATION FEES: 8a. ‐ Temporary Homeless Encampments & Temporary Use Permits Code  Amendments ‐ Title IV Docket #D‐09 & #D‐37 (1st reading 11/8/2010)Page 85 of 195 ORDINANCE NO. Submittal requirements and application fees Sshall be as listed in RMC 4-8- 120C, Land Use Applications, and 4 1 170, Land Use Review Foos the City of Renton Fee Schedule Brochure. EG. PUBLIC NOTICE AND COMMENT PERIOD: Public notice and comment period Sshall be as listed in RMC 4-8-090, Public Notice Requirements, oxcopt that public notico is not required for application requesting a temporary manufactured homo for medical hardship. f H. WAIVER OF REQUIREMENTS AND FEES: Except for sign roquiromonts of RMC 4 8 090, tThe Community and Economic Development Administrator ef—designee—may waive specific application requirements determined to be unnecessary for review of an application. The Administrator may waive the permit application fee for public service activities and nonprofit organizations. G\_. APPLICATION PROCESS AND REVIEW AUTHORITY: The Community and Economic Development Administrator or designee shall, in consultation with appropriate City departments, review and decide upon each application for a temporary use permit. The Administrator or designee may approve, modify, or condition an application for a temporary use permit. Hi. DECISION CRITERIA: The Community and Economic Development Administrator or designee may approve, modify, or condition an application for a temporary use permit, based on consideration of the following factors: 8a. ‐ Temporary Homeless Encampments & Temporary Use Permits Code  Amendments ‐ Title IV Docket #D‐09 & #D‐37 (1st reading 11/8/2010)Page 86 of 195 ORDINANCE NO. 1. The temporary use will not be materially detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare, nor injurious to property or improvements in the vicinity of the temporary use; and 2. Adequate parking facilities and vehicle ingress and egress are provided to serve the temporary use and any existing uses on the site; and 3. Hours of operation of the temporary use are specified, and would not adversely impact surrounding uses; and 4. The temporary use will not cause nuisance factors such as noise, light, or glare which adversely impacts surrounding uses; and 5. If applicable, the applicant has obtained the required right-of-way use permit. K. ADDITIONAL CONDITIONS FOR VEHICLE SALES EVENTS, MOBILE FOOD VENDORS, AND TEMPORARY HOMELESS ENCAMPMENTS: 1. Vehicle Sales Events held on property not currently used as an auto dealership: Only for properties in the Automall as shown in RMC 4-3-040 or the Employment Area Valley (EAV) land use designation are eligible for a temporary use permit. Additionally, no more than one vehicle sales event shall be allowed per quarter of the year (year beginning January 1st) per property or development as determined by the Community and Economic Development Administrator or designee. The use must be allowed by the zone district. Further, each such event shall only be permitted for a maximum of seven (7) consecutive 8a. ‐ Temporary Homeless Encampments & Temporary Use Permits Code  Amendments ‐ Title IV Docket #D‐09 & #D‐37 (1st reading 11/8/2010)Page 87 of 195 ORDINANCE NO. days per quarter. Such sales are not permissible outside of the Automall and Employment Area Valley and are not eligible for a Temporary Use Permit. 2. Mobile Food Vendors: Vendors shall comply with all standards established by the Seattle-King County Health Department. In addition in the IL, IM, IH, CA, CV and CD zones, no licensed vending unit shall remain at the permitted location between 12:00 a.m. (midnight) and 5:00 a.m. on a daily basis, except for a special event where a unit is allowed at the same location for up to seventy-two (72) hours. 3. Temporary Homeless Encampments: a. Location Criteria: A temporary homeless encampment shall be located at a religious institution. If the religious institution is not actively practicing on the site proposed for a temporary encampment, then the religious institution must comply with all other permit requirements for the underlying zone required for siting a new religious institution and temporary homeless encampment- fa. Setbacks: The temporary homeless encampment shall be located a minimum of 20 feet from the property line of abutting properties containing residential uses. c. Visual Buffering: A six-foot high sight obscuring fence, vegetative screen or other visual buffering shall be provided between the temporary homeless encampment and any abutting residential property and the right-of- way. The fence shall provide privacy and a visual buffering for encampment 8a. ‐ Temporary Homeless Encampments & Temporary Use Permits Code  Amendments ‐ Title IV Docket #D‐09 & #D‐37 (1st reading 11/8/2010)Page 88 of 195 ORDINANCE NO. residents and neighboring properties in a manner and material approved by the code official. The code official shall consider existing vegetation, fencing, topographic variations and other site conditions in determining compliance with this requirement. d. Exterior Lighting: Exterior lighting must be directed downward, away from abutting and adjoining properties, and contained within the temporary homeless encampment. e. Maximum Residents: The maximum number of residents within a temporary homeless encampment is 100. f. Additional Parking: Each lot occupied by a temporary homeless encampment must provide or have available parking and vehicular maneuvering area. The temporary homeless encampment and the parking of any vehicles associated with a temporary homeless encampment application shall not displace the host site's parking lot in such a way that the host site no longer meets the minimum or required parking of the principle use as required by code or previous approvals unless an alternative parking plan has been approved. g. Transit Proximity and Transportation Plan: A transportation plan is required which shall include provision of transit services. The temporary homeless encampment shall be within a half mile of a public transit stop or the sponsor or managing organization must demonstrate the ability for residents to obtain access to the nearest public transportation stop through sponsor or host provided van or car pools. During hours when public transportation is not 10 8a. ‐ Temporary Homeless Encampments & Temporary Use Permits Code  Amendments ‐ Title IV Docket #D‐09 & #D‐37 (1st reading 11/8/2010)Page 89 of 195 ORDINANCE NO. available, the sponsor or host shall also make transportation available to anyone who is rejected from or ordered to leave the temporary homeless encampment. h. Code of Conduct: A code of conduct is required to be enforced by the managing agency. The code shall contain the following as a minimum: i. No drugs or alcohol. ii. No concealed weapons without a current valid concealed weapons permit. iii. No menacing, threatening or assaultive behavior. iv. No open flames. v. No loitering in the surrounding neighborhood. vi. Quiet hours- Nothing within this subsection shall prohibit the temporary homeless encampment sponsor or managing organization from imposing and enforcing additional code of conduct conditions not otherwise inconsistent with this section. The managing agency shall enforce the written code of conduct. Failure by the managing agency to take action against a resident who violates the terms of the written code of conduct may result in cancellation of the permit. i. Compliance with health and safety codes: The temporary homeless encampment shall comply with all applicable standards of the Seattle-King County Health Department, or its successor. The managing agency shall ensure compliance with Washington State and City codes concerning but not limited to 11 8a. ‐ Temporary Homeless Encampments & Temporary Use Permits Code  Amendments ‐ Title IV Docket #D‐09 & #D‐37 (1st reading 11/8/2010)Page 90 of 195 ORDINANCE NO. drinking water connections, human waste, solid waste disposal, electrical systems, and fire-resistant materials. j. Inspections: The temporary homeless encampment shall permit regular inspections by the City, including the Police Department and Fire & Emergency Services Department, and King County Health Department to check compliance with the standards for temporary homeless encampment. k. Identification: The managing agency shall take all reasonable and legal steps to obtain verifiable identification, such as a driver's license, government- issued identification card, military identification or passport from prospective and temporary homeless encampment residents. I. Log-in and Identification: The temporary homeless encampment managing organization shall maintain a resident log for all who are residing at the temporary homeless encampment. Such log shall be kept onsite at the temporary homeless encampment. Prospective encampment residents shall provide a verifiable form of identification when signing the log. m. Duration and Frequency: Temporary homeless encampments may be approved for a time period not to exceed 92 days, including setup and dismantling of the encampment. A temporary homeless encampment may be located at the same site no more than once every 12 months. For the purposes of this subsection, the 12 months shall be calculated from the last day of the prior encampment at the site. 12 8a. ‐ Temporary Homeless Encampments & Temporary Use Permits Code  Amendments ‐ Title IV Docket #D‐09 & #D‐37 (1st reading 11/8/2010)Page 91 of 195 ORDINANCE NO. n. Public Meeting: Informal Public Meeting Required. The Community & Economic Development Administrator shall require an applicant to conduct an informal public meeting to inform citizens about a proposed temporary homeless encampment prior to submittal of an application. Notice of the informal public meeting shall be provided in the same manner as required for notice of the application, at least 10 days prior to the informal public meeting- Prior to the informal public meeting, the temporary homeless encampment sponsor and managing organization shall meet and confer with the Police Department regarding any proposed security measures. At the informal public meeting, a representative of the temporary homeless encampment sponsor and managing organization shall present in writing and describe the proposed temporary homeless encampment location, timing, site plan, code of conduct, encampment concerns, management security measures, and any input or comment received on the plan, including any comment or input from the Police Department, or comment or input from schools and/or child care services- Copies of the agenda and other materials shall be provided by the applicant at the meeting. The meeting shall be conducted on the subject property whenever feasible. o. Notification to Schools and Child Care Services: Prior to any application for a temporary homeless encampment permit, the temporary homeless encampment sponsor, or temporary homeless encampment managing organization shall meet and confer with the administration of any public or 13 8a. ‐ Temporary Homeless Encampments & Temporary Use Permits Code  Amendments ‐ Title IV Docket #D‐09 & #D‐37 (1st reading 11/8/2010)Page 92 of 195 ORDINANCE NO. private elementary, middle, junior high or high school within 600 feet of the boundaries of the lot(s) proposed to contain the temporary homeless encampment, and shall meet and confer with the operators of any properly licensed child care service within 600 feet of the boundaries of the lot(s) proposed to contain the temporary homeless encampment. The temporary homeless encampment sponsor and the school administration and/or child care service operator shall make a good faith effort to agree upon any additional conditions that may be appropriate or necessary to address school and/or child care concerns regarding the location of a temporary encampment within 600 feet of such a facility. Any such conditions agreed upon between the parties shall be submitted to the Hearing Examiner for consideration, for inclusion within the temporary homeless encampment permit. In the event the parties fail to agree on any conditions, either party may provide the Hearing Examiner with a written summary of the parties' discussions, which the Hearing Examiner may consider in evaluating whether the conditions for the temporary homeless encampment permit are met, or the need for additional conditions upon the temporary homeless encampment permit, without violating the legal rights of the temporary homeless encampment sponsor. p. Review Authority, Appeals, and Permit Revocation: Decision authority is at the Hearing Examiner level with a public hearing, as designee for Community and Economic Development Administrator, and the Appeal Authority 14 8a. ‐ Temporary Homeless Encampments & Temporary Use Permits Code  Amendments ‐ Title IV Docket #D‐09 & #D‐37 (1st reading 11/8/2010)Page 93 of 195 ORDINANCE NO. is with City Council. If a permit is revoked pursuant to RMC 4-9-240O1, applicant may request an appeal before the City Council. *L SPECIAL CRITERIA FOR TEMPORARY MANUFACTURED HOME FOR MEDICAL HARDSHIP: In lieu of the criteria in subsection H of this Section, a manufactured home which complies with Housing and Urban Development (HUD) standards may be permitted as a temporary dwelling on the same lot as a permanent dwelling provided the applicant demonstrates the temporary dwelling is necessary to provide daily care to an individual certified by a physician as needing such care. The primary provider of daily care shall reside on site; the manufactured home together with the permanent residence shall meet the setback, height, building footprint, and lot coverage provisions for the applicable zone. JJM- CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL: 1. General: The Community and Economic Development Administrator or designee may establish conditions as may be deemed necessary to ensure land use compatibility and to minimize potential impacts on nearby uses. These include, but are not limited to, requiring that notice be given to adjacent/abutting property owners prior to approval, time and frequency of operation, temporary arrangements for parking and traffic circulation, requirement for screening or enclosure, and guarantees for site restoration and cleanup following temporary uses. 15 8a. ‐ Temporary Homeless Encampments & Temporary Use Permits Code  Amendments ‐ Title IV Docket #D‐09 & #D‐37 (1st reading 11/8/2010)Page 94 of 195 ORDINANCE NO. 2. Additional Requirements - for Model Homes: In addition to the requirements of subsection Jl, General, of this Section, the Administrator or designee may require conditions of approval regarding access/roadway construction, temporary erosion control, utilities, street and lot addressing, building permits, staking of proposed lots underlying the model homes, staking of model home lot setbacks, plat approval, abatement agreements and indemnification, and security devices for removal of model homes if plat is not recorded. KN. OTHER REQUIRED PERMITS: The temporary use may also require permits and inspections from both Fire and Emergency Services and/or Development Services Division to ensure that the temporary use is in compliance with Fire/Building Codes. tO. EXPIRATION AND EXTENSION: 1. Standard Period of Validity: Except as specified in subsection L2 of this Section, a temporary use permit is valid for up to one year from the effective date of the permit, unless the Community and Economic Development Administrator or designee establishes a shorter time frame. 2. Special Expiration/Extension Periods for Manufactured Homes for Medical Hardship: The temporary use permit for a manufactured home for medical hardship shall be effective for twelve (12) months. Extension of the temporary use permit may be approved in twelve (12) month increments subject to demonstration of continuing medical hardship. The manufactured home shall 16 8a. ‐ Temporary Homeless Encampments & Temporary Use Permits Code  Amendments ‐ Title IV Docket #D‐09 & #D‐37 (1st reading 11/8/2010)Page 95 of 195 ORDINANCE NO. be removed within ninety (90) days of the expiration of the temporary use permit or the cessation of provision of daily care. MP. REMOVAL OF TEMPORARY USE REQUIRED: Each site occupied by a temporary use shall be left free of debris, litter, or other evidence of the temporary use upon completion of removal of the use. NQ. SECURITY: The Community and Economic Development Administrator or designee may require security in conformance with RMC 4-9-060C to assure compliance with the provisions of the temporary use permit as approved if required. The amount of the security will be determined by the Community and Economic Development Administrator or designee, but in no case shall it be less than one thousand dollars ($1,000.00). The security may be used by the City to abate the use and/or facilities. OR. PERMIT REVOCATION: 1. Revocation of Temporary Use Permit: Should the Community and Economic Development Administrator or designee determine that information has been provided to the City which was false, incomplete, or has changed, such that the decision criteria in subsection H of this Section are incorrect, false, or have not been met, or the temporary use actually being used is different than or greater than that applied for, or if the use itself is a nuisance, unhealthy, unsafe or poses a substantial risk of harm to persons or property, then the Administrator or designee may revoke the temporary use permit upon ten (10) 17 8a. ‐ Temporary Homeless Encampments & Temporary Use Permits Code  Amendments ‐ Title IV Docket #D‐09 & #D‐37 (1st reading 11/8/2010)Page 96 of 195 ORDINANCE NO. days' written notice, unless an emergency exists, in which case the Administrator or designee may declare such an emergency and immediately revoke the temporary use permit. 2. Appeal: If revoked pursuant to RMC 4-9-240O1, applicant may request an appeal before the City's Hearing Examiner. SECTION V. Section 4-11-050, Definitions E, of Chapter 11, Definitions, of Title IV (Development Regulations) of Ordinance No. 4260 entitled "Code of General Ordinances of the City of Renton, Washington", is hereby amended so the definition of "Eating and Drinking Establishment" is amended as follows: EATING AND DRINKING ESTABLISHMENT: A retail establishment selling food and/or drink for consumption on the premises or for take-out, including accessory on-site food preparation. This definition includes, but is not limited to, restaurants, cafes, microbrew establishments, and espresso stands. This definition excludes taverns; mobile food vending; fast food; entertainment clubs; dance clubs; and/or dance halls. SECTION VI. Section 4-11-080, Definitions H, of Chapter 11, Definitions, of Title IV (Development Regulations) of Ordinance No. 4260 entitled "Code of General Ordinances of the City of Renton, Washington", is hereby amended to add a definition for "Homeless Encampment", to read as follows: HOMELESS ENCAMPMENT: See TEMPORARY HOMELESS ENCAMPMENT- SECTION VII. Section 4-11-130, Definitions M, of Chapter 11, Definitions, of Title IV (Development Regulations) of Ordinance No. 4260 entitled "Code of General Ordinances of the 18 8a. ‐ Temporary Homeless Encampments & Temporary Use Permits Code  Amendments ‐ Title IV Docket #D‐09 & #D‐37 (1st reading 11/8/2010)Page 97 of 195 ORDINANCE NO. City of Renton, Washington", is hereby amended so the definition of "Mobile Food Vending Unit" is amended as follows: MOBILE FOOD VENDING-UN4T-: A temporary use involving sale of retail food or beverages to the public from any vehicle, cart or wagon that is designed to be readily movable. A-mMobile food vending unit includes pushcarts, mobile kitchens, hot dog carts, pretzel wagons, or similar uses. SECTION VIII. Section 4-11-200, Definitions T, of Chapter 11, Definitions, of Title IV (Development Regulations) of Ordinance No. 4260 entitled "Code of General Ordinances of the City of Renton, Washington", is hereby amended to add a definition for "Temporary Homeless Encampment", to read as follows: TEMPORARY HOMELESS ENCAMPMENT: A group of homeless persons temporarily residing out of doors on a site with services provided by a sponsor and supervised by a managing organization. A. Managing Organization, Temporary Homeless Encampment: A group or organization that has the capacity to organize and manage a temporary homeless encampment. A temporary encampment "managing organization" may be the same entity as the temporary homeless encampment sponsor. B. Sponsor, Temporary Homeless Encampment: A religious institution which: jL owns the property or has an ownership interest in the property, for which a temporary homeless encampment is to be located, and 19 8a. ‐ Temporary Homeless Encampments & Temporary Use Permits Code  Amendments ‐ Title IV Docket #D‐09 & #D‐37 (1st reading 11/8/2010)Page 98 of 195 ORDINANCE NO. 2, that has an agreement with the temporary homeless encampment managing organization to provide basic services and support for the residents of a temporary homeless encampment and liaison with the surrounding community and 3. joins with the managing organization in an application for a temporary homeless encampment permit. A "sponsor" may be the same entity as the managing organization. SECTION IX. This ordinance shall be effective upon its passage, approval, and five (5) days after publication. PASSED BY THE CITY COUNCIL this day of , 2010. Bonnie I. Walton, City Clerk APPROVED BY THE MAYOR this day of , 2010. Denis Law, Mayor Approved as to form: Lawrence J. Warren, City Attorney Date of Publication: ORD:1657:9/9/10:scr 20 8a. ‐ Temporary Homeless Encampments & Temporary Use Permits Code  Amendments ‐ Title IV Docket #D‐09 & #D‐37 (1st reading 11/8/2010)Page 99 of 195 $t-L*~j. .vt H'f-AOiO r AmJm^ CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON ORDINANCE NO. AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON, AMENDING SUBSECTION 4-2-010E, ADDITIONAL RESTRICTIONS ON LAND USE , OF CHAPTER 2, ZONING DISTRICTS - USES AND STANDARDS, SECTION 4-9-150, PLANNED URBAN DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS, OF CHAPTER 9, PERMITS - SPECIFIC, AND SECTION 4-11-160, DEFINITIONS P, OF CHAPTER 11, DEFINITIONS, OF TITLE IV (DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS) OF ORDINANCE NO. 4260 ENTITLED "CODE OF GENERAL ORDINANCES OF THE CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON", TO UPDATE THE PLANNED URBAN DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS AND AMEND OPEN SPACE REQUIREMENTS FOR PLANNED URBAN DEVELOPMENTS. I j - WHEREAS, the Planned Urban Development process is a unique development option designed specifically to allow for flexibility from the prescriptive development standards of a particular zone, allowing for better use of the land in exchange for an identified public benefit; and WHEREAS, the purpose statement of the Planned Urban Development ordinance indicates two guiding principles: to preserve and protect natural features of the land and encourage innovation and creativity in development; and WHEREAS, the amendments to the Planned Urban Development regulations are supported by the guiding principles; and WHEREAS, this matter was duly referred to the Planning Commission for investigation, study, and the matter having been duly considered by the Planning Commission, and the zoning text amendment request being in conformity with the City's Comprehensive Plan, as amended; and 8b. ‐ Planned Urban Development Regulations Code Amendment ‐ Title  IV Docket #D‐38 (1st reading 11/8/2010)Page 100 of 195 ORDINANCE NO. WHEREAS, the Planning Commission held a public hearing on July 7, 2010, having duly considered all matters relevant thereto, and all parties having been heard appearing in support or opposition; NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON, DOES ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS: SECTION I: Subsection 4-2-010E, Additional Restrictions on Land Use, of Chapter 2, Zoning Districts - Uses and Standards, of Title IV (Development Regulations) of Ordinance No. 4260 entitled "Code of General Ordinances of the City of Renton, Washington", is hereby amended so the box containing "Planned Unit Development" in the column for Type of Land Use Restriction, is amended as follows: Planned Uwfc Urban Development SECTION II: Subsections 4-9-150B.1, Zones, and 4-9-150B.2, Code Provisions That May be Modified, of Chapter 9, Permits - Specific, of Title IV (Development Regulations) of Ordinance No. 4260 entitled "Code of General Ordinances of the City of Renton, Washington", are hereby amended as follows: 1. Zones: Planned urban developments may be permitted in tho following al] zoning districts, when processed and approved as provided in this Section.^ a. All zonos, oxcopt R 1, R 4 and COR. 2. Code Provisions That May Be Modified: a. In approving a planned urban development, the City may modify any of the standards of chapters 4-2 RMC, chapter 4-4 RMC, Section 4-6-060 and chapter 4-7 RMC and RMC 4 6 060, except as listed in subsection B.3 of this 8b. ‐ Planned Urban Development Regulations Code Amendment ‐ Title  IV Docket #D‐38 (1st reading 11/8/2010)Page 101 of 195 ORDINANCE NO. Section. All modifications shall be considered simultaneously as part of the planned urban development. b. An applicant may request additional modifications from the requirements of RMC Title 4, except those listed in subsection B3 of this Section. Approval for modifications other than those specifically described subsection B.2^ of this Section shall be approved by tho City Council prior to submittal of a preliminary planned urban development plan. SECTION III: Subsection 4-9-150D.2, Public Benefit Required, of Chapter 9, Permits - Specific, of Title IV (Development Regulations) of Ordinance No. 4260 entitled "Code of General Ordinances of the City of Renton, Washington", is hereby amended to add a new subsection 4- 9-150D.2.d entitled "Use of Sustainable Development Techniques", as shown below. The current subsection d shall be re-lettered as subsection e. d. Use of Sustainable Development Techniques: Design which results in a sustainable development; such as LEED certification, energy efficiency, use of alternative energy resources, low impact development techniques, etc.; or SECTION IV: Subsection 4-9-150D.2.d, Overall Design, of Chapter 9, Permits - Specific, of Title IV (Development Regulations) of Ordinance No. 4260 entitled "Code of General Ordinances of the City of Renton, Washington", is hereby amended to be re-lettered as subsection e, as specified in Section III of this ordinance, and as follows: 4-e. Overall Design: Provides a planned urban development design that is superior in ono or moro of tho following ways to the design that would result 8b. ‐ Planned Urban Development Regulations Code Amendment ‐ Title  IV Docket #D‐38 (1st reading 11/8/2010)Page 102 of 195 ORDINANCE NO. from development of the subject property without a planned urban developments A superior design may include the following: i. Open Space/Recreation: (a) Provides increased open space or recreational facilities beyond standard code requirements and considered equivalent to features that would offset park mitigation fees in Resolution 3082; and (b) Provides a quality environment through either passive or active recreation facilities and attractive common areas, including accessibility to buildings from parking areas and public walkways; or ii. Circulation/Screening: Provides superior circulation patterns or location or screening of parking facilities; or iii. Landscaping/Screening: Provides superior landscaping, buffering, or screening in or around the proposed planned urban development; or iv. Site and Building Design: Provides superior architectural design, placement, relationship or orientation of structures, or use of solar energy; or v. Alleys: Provides alleys to at least fifty porcont (50%) of for any proposed detached or attached units with individual, private ground related entries. SECTION V: Subsection 4-9-150D.3.g, Parking Area Design, of Chapter 9, Permits - Specific, of Title IV (Development Regulations) of Ordinance No. 4260 entitled "Code of General Ordinances of the City of Renton, Washington", is hereby amended as follows: 8b. ‐ Planned Urban Development Regulations Code Amendment ‐ Title  IV Docket #D‐38 (1st reading 11/8/2010)Page 103 of 195 ORDINANCE NO. g. Parking Area Design:- -h—Design: Provides parking areas that are complemented by landscaping and not designed in long rows. The size of parking areas is minimized in comparison to typical designs, and each area related to the group of buildings served. The design provides for efficient use of parking, and shared parking facilities where appropriate. ii. Adequacy: Provides sufficient on site vehicular parking areas consistent with tho parking demand created by the dovolopmont as documented in a parking analysis approved by the City. Parking management plans shall ensure sufficient resident, employee, or visitor parking standards, and thoro shall bo no reliance on adjacent or abutting properties unless a shared parking arrangement consistent with RMC 4 4 080 is approved. SECTION VI: Subsection 4-9-150D.4, Compliance with Development Standards, of Chapter 9, Permits - Specific, of Title IV (Development Regulations) of Ordinance No. 4260 entitled "Code of General Ordinances of the City of Renton, Washington", is hereby amended as follows: 4. Compliance with Development Standards: Each planned urban development shall demonstrate compliance with the development standards contained in subsection E of this Section, the underlying zone, and any overlay districts; unless a modification for a specific development standard has been requested pursuant to RMC4-9-150B.2. 8b. ‐ Planned Urban Development Regulations Code Amendment ‐ Title  IV Docket #D‐38 (1st reading 11/8/2010)Page 104 of 195 ORDINANCE NO. SECTION VII: Subsection 4-9-150E.l.a, Residential, of Chapter 9, Permits - Specific, of Title IV (Development Regulations) of Ordinance No. 4260 entitled "Code of General Ordinances of the City of Renton, Washington", is hereby amended as follows: a. Residential: For residential developments, opon space must bo equal to or greater in size than tho total square footage of tho lot aroa reductions roquosted by the planned urban dovolopmont, as illustrated in Figure 1. Tho opon space shall not include a critical aroa and shall be concentrated in largo usable areas. For residential developments open space must equal at least ten percent (10%) of the development site's gross land area. i. Open space may include, but is not limited to, the following: (a) A trail that allows opportunity for passive recreation within a critical area buffer (only the square footage of the trial shall be included in the open space area calculation), or (b) A sidewalk and its associated landscape strip, when abutting the edge of a critical area buffer and when a part of a new public or private road, or (c) A similar proposal as approved by the reviewing official. ii. Additionally, a minimum area equal to fifty (50) square feet per unit of common space or recreation area shall be provided in a concentrated space as illustrated in Figure 1. 8b. ‐ Planned Urban Development Regulations Code Amendment ‐ Title  IV Docket #D‐38 (1st reading 11/8/2010)Page 105 of 195 ORDINANCE NO. iii. Stormwater facilities may be incorporated with the open space^ common space or recreation area on a case-by-case basis if the Reviewing Official finds: Ma) The stormwater facility utilizes the techniques and landscape requirements set forth in The Integrated Pond, King County Water and Land Resources Division, or an equivalent manual, or Hr(b) The surface water feature serves areas outside of the planned urban development and is appropriate in size and creates a benefit. <0 T L lV ^!fe! S^rr^muKr-rR V? I '' „_JL»J™ r^ni", r"r::rTn i i ! IMU \ mm •• • ! ski ii"/ --"""•' """"x \ fell j£J l j f r. -J ,/ ai-m\m Li *J_J J Site Area: 1.5 acres Typical Lot Size: 4,500 sq. ft. Total Number of Lots: 12 Site Area: 1.5 acres Typical Lot Size: 3,500 sq. ft. Total Number of Lots: 12 Open Space: = 4,500 s.f. minus 3,500 s.f. 1,000 s.f. x 12 lots - 12,000 7,134 sq. ft. Standard Subdivision Example Planned Urban Development Approach Figure 1. Common Open Space Example SECTION VIII: Subsection 4-9-150E.2, Private Open Space, of Chapter 9, Permits - Specific, of Title IV (Development Regulations) of Ordinance No. 4260 entitled "Code of General Ordinances of the City of Renton, Washington", is hereby amended as follows: 8b. ‐ Planned Urban Development Regulations Code Amendment ‐ Title  IV Docket #D‐38 (1st reading 11/8/2010)Page 106 of 195 ORDINANCE NO. 2. Private Open Space: Each residential unit in a planned urban development shall have usable private open space (in addition to parking, storage space, lobbies, and corridors) for the exclusive use of the occupants of that unit. Each ground floor unit, whether attached or detached, shall have private open space which is contiguous to the unit, and shall bo an aroa of at least twenty percent (20%) of the gross square footago of tho dwelling units. The private open space shall be well demarcated and at least ten fifteen feet (105') in every dimension O {decks on upper floors can substitute for some of the required private open space for upper floor units). For dwelling units which are exclusively upper story units, there shall be deck areas totaling at least sixty (60) square feet in size with no dimension less than five feet (5'). SECTION IX: Subsection 4-9-150F.10.a, New Planned Urban Development Approval, of Chapter 9, Permits - Specific, of Title IV (Development Regulations) of Ordinance No. 4260 entitled "Code of General Ordinances of the City of Renton, Washington", is hereby amended as follows: a. New Planned Urban Development Approval: Upon tho authority of the approval ordinance of a preliminary planned urban development, the City shall place the planned urban development land use file number as an overlay on the subject property on the City of Renton Zoning Map. 8b. ‐ Planned Urban Development Regulations Code Amendment ‐ Title  IV Docket #D‐38 (1st reading 11/8/2010)Page 107 of 195 ORDINANCE NO. SECTION X: Subsection 4-9-150G.1, Time Limits, of Chapter 9, Permits - Specific, of Title IV (Development Regulations) of Ordinance No. 4260 entitled "Code of General Ordinances of the City of Renton, Washington", is hereby amended as follows: 1. Time Limits: The developer shall, within two (2) years of the effective date of action by the Hearing Examiner to approve the preliminary plan, submit to the Department of Community and Economic Development a final development plan showing the ultimate design and specific details of the proposed planned urban development or the final phase or phases thereof^ provided, however, that for a preliminary plan approved concurrent with a preliminary subdivision, the developer shall submit the final development plan within five (5) years of the effective date of action by the Hearing Examiner to approve the preliminary plan. Upon application by the developer, the Hearing Examiner may grant an extension of the approved preliminary plan for a maximum of twelve (12) months. Application for such extension shall be made at least thirty (30) days prior to the expiration date of preliminary plan approval. Only one such extension may be granted for a planned urban development. If a final development plan is not filed within the identified time limits such two (2) years or within the extended time period, if any, the planned urban development preliminary plan shall be deemed to have expired or been abandoned. To activate an expired or abandoned planned urban development, a new application is required. 8b. ‐ Planned Urban Development Regulations Code Amendment ‐ Title  IV Docket #D‐38 (1st reading 11/8/2010)Page 108 of 195 ORDINANCE NO. SECTION XI: Section 4-11-160, Definitions P, of Chapter 11, Definitions, of Title IV (Development Regulations) of Ordinance No. 4260 entitled "Code of General Ordinances of the City of Renton, Washington", is hereby amended so the definition of "Planned Unit Development" is amended as follows: PLANNED UfflT-URBAN DEVELOPMENT (PUD): Any development approved and developed in accordance with the terms of RMC 4-9-150, including a subdivision of such land, which development may occur at one time or in phases SECTION XII: This ordinance shall be effective upon its passage, approval, and five (5) days after publication. PASSED BY THE CITY COUNCIL this day of _ _, 2010. Bonnie I. Walton, City Clerk APPROVED BY THE MAYOR this day of _, 2010. Approved as to form: Lawrence J. Warren, City Attorney Denis Law, Mayor Date of Publication: ORD:1653:8/5/10:scr 10 8b. ‐ Planned Urban Development Regulations Code Amendment ‐ Title  IV Docket #D‐38 (1st reading 11/8/2010)Page 109 of 195 fA£0^fy zm p- to JO CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON ORDINANCE NO. AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON, AMENDING SUBSECTIONS 4-3-100A, PURPOSE, 4-3-100B.1, APPLICABILITY, AND 4-3-100E, REQUIREMENTS, OF CHAPTER 3, ENVIRONMENTAL REGULATIONS AND OVERLAY DISTRICTS, OF TITLE IV (DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS) OF ORDINANCE NO. 4260 ENTITLED "CODE OF GENERAL ORDINANCES OF THE CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON", TO AMEND THE URBAN DESIGN REGULATIONS. WHEREAS, the goals of the Community Design element of the Comprehensive Plan seek to raise the aesthetic quality of the City, strengthen the economy through high quality development, and to ensure that a high quality of life is maintained as Renton evolves; and WHEREAS, the City has established Urban Design Regulations to implement these goals of the Comprehensive Plan; and WHEREAS, the City seeks to ensure that the guidelines of the Urban Design Regulations are clear and concise; and WHEREAS, this matter was referred to the Planning Commission for investigation, study, and the matter having been considered by the Planning Commission, and the zoning text amendment request being in conformity with the City's Comprehensive Plan, as amended; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission held a public hearing on July 7, 2010, having considered all matters relevant thereto, and all parties having been heard appearing in support or in opposition; NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON, DOES ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS: SECTION I. Subsection 4-3-100A.2 of subsection 4-3-100A, Purpose, of Chapter 3, Environmental Regulations and Overlay Districts, of Title IV (Development Regulations) of 8c. ‐ Urban Design Regulations Code Amendment ‐ Title IV Docket #D‐39  (1st reading 11/8/2010)Page 110 of 195 ORDINANCE NO. Ordinance No. 4260 entitled "Code of General Ordinances of the City of Renton, Washington", is hereby amended as follows: 2. This Section lists elements that are required to be included in all development in the zones stated in subsection Bl of this Section. Each element includes an intent statement, guidelines, and standards, and guidolinos. In order to provide predictability, standards are provided. These standards specify a prescriptive manner in which the requirement can be met. In order to provide flexibility, guidelines are also stated for each element. These guidelines and the intent statement provide direction for those who seek to meet the required element in a manner that is different from the standards. a. The determination as to the satisfaction of the requirement through the use of the guidelines and the intent statement is to be made by the Administrator of the Department of Community and Economic Development or designee. b. When the Administrator of the Department of Community and Economic Development or designee has determined that the proposed manner of meeting the design requirement through the guidelines and intent is sufficient, the applicant shall not be required to demonstrate sufficiency to the standard associated with the guideline that has been approved. SECTION II. Subsection 4-3-100B.l.b of subsection 4-3-100B.1, Applicability, of Chapter 3, Environmental Regulations and Overlay Districts, of Title IV (Development 8c. ‐ Urban Design Regulations Code Amendment ‐ Title IV Docket #D‐39  (1st reading 11/8/2010)Page 111 of 195 ORDINANCE NO. Regulations) of Ordinance No. 4260 entitled "Code of General Ordinances of the City of Renton, Washington", is hereby amended as follows: b. Any of the activities listed in subsection Bla of this Section and occurring in the following overlay areas or zone shall be required to comply with the provisions of this section. Big box rotail as outlined below shall also bo required to comply with the provisions of this section. i. Mapped Overlays: This Section shall apply to all dovolopmont occurring in design districts as indicated on the Urban Design Districts map, subsection B3 of this Section. To clarify tho map, the Center Downtown (CD) Zono is locatod in District 7\/ South Ronton and the Residential Multi Family (RMF) zone locatod within the Center Village Land Uso Designation are District 'B,' and tho Urban Center - North Zones aro locatod within District 'C District 'C also includes tho Commercial/Office/Residontial (COR) Zone. Areas within Center Village Land Use Designation zonod Center Village (CV) shall comprise District 'D.' District A: All parts of the City zoned Center Downtown (CD) or Residential Multi-Family Urban (RM-U). ii. Big Box Rotail: This Section shall also apply to big box rotail use. In tho Commercial Arterial (CA) zone, big box rotail usos aro subject to compliance with design regulations applicable to District 'D,' oxcopt in tho Employment Area - Valley (EAV) south of Interstate 405, where big box rotail usos must comply with design standards and guidelines specific to tho Urban Confer—North (District 'C'). Big box rotail usos in tho EAV south of Interstate 405 outside of the CA zono 8c. ‐ Urban Design Regulations Code Amendment ‐ Title IV Docket #D‐39  (1st reading 11/8/2010)Page 112 of 195 ORDINANCE NO. aro not subject to Urban Design Regulations. District B: All parts of the City zoned Residential Multi-Family Traditional (RM-T) or Residential Multi-Family (RM-F). iii. CA Zone: This Section shall also apply to all dovolopmont in tho Commercial Arterial (CA) Zone. For tho purposes of tho design regulations, the zono shall be in District 'P.' District C: All parts of the City zoned Urban Center North 1 (UC-N1), Urban Center North 2 (UC-N2), or Commercial Office Residential (COR). iv. District D: All parts of the City zoned Center Village (CV) or Commercial Arterial (CA). SECTION III. Subsection 4-3-100E, Requirements, of Chapter 3, Environmental Regulations and Overlay Districts, of Title IV (Development Regulations) of Ordinance No. 4260 entitled "Code of General Ordinances of the City of Renton, Washington", is hereby amended as shown on Attachment A. SECTION IV. This ordinance shall be effective upon its passage, approval, and five (5) days after publication. PASSED BY THE CITY COUNCIL this day of , 2010. Bonnie I. Walton, City Clerk 8c. ‐ Urban Design Regulations Code Amendment ‐ Title IV Docket #D‐39  (1st reading 11/8/2010)Page 113 of 195 ORDINANCE NO. APPROVED BY THE MAYOR this day of , 2010. Approved as to form: Lawrence J. Warren, City Attorney Date of Publication: ORD:1666:10/13/10:scr Denis Law, Mayor 8c. ‐ Urban Design Regulations Code Amendment ‐ Title IV Docket #D‐39  (1st reading 11/8/2010)Page 114 of 195 ORDINANCE NO. 4-3-100 E. REQUIREMENTS: 1. Site Design and Building Location: Intent: To ensure that buildings are located in relation to streets and other buildings so that the Vision of the City of Renton can be realized for a high-density urban environment; so that businesses enjoy visibility from public rights-of-way; and to encourage pedestrian activity. BUILDING LOCATION AND ORIENTATION Intent: To ensure visibility of businesses and to establish active, lively uses along sidewalks and pedestrian pathways. To organize buildings for pedestrian use and so that natural light is available to other structures and open space. To ensure an appropriate transition between buildings, parking areas, and other land uses; and increase privacy for residential uses. Guidelines: Siting of a structure should take into consideration the availability of natural light (both direct and rofloctod) and direct sun oxposuro to noarby buildings and opon space (except parking aroas) Ground floor rosidontiol usos locatod near tho stroot should bo raised above stroot lovol for residents' privacy. Developments shall enhance the mutual relationship of buildings with each other, as well as with the roads, open space, and pedestrian amenities while working to create a pedestrian oriented environment. Lots shall be configured to encourage variety and so that natural light is available to buildings and open space. The privacy of individuals in residential uses shall be provided for. Standards: Districts A, B, and D Both All of the following are required: 1. The availability of natural light (both direct and reflected) and direct sun exposure to nearby buildings and open space (except parking areas) shall be considered when siting structures. 42. Buildings shall be oriented to the street with clear connections to the sidewalk. 23. The front entry of a building shall be oriented to the street or a landscaped pedestrian- only courtyard. 4. Buildings with residential uses located at the street level shall be: a. Set back from the sidewalk a minimum often feet (10') and feature substantial landscaping between the sidewalk and the building (illustration below); or b. Have the ground floor residential uses raised above street level for residents' privacy. District C All of the following are required: 1. Buildings shall contain podostrian oriontod usos, feature "podostrian oriontod facades and havo clear connoctions to tho sidewalk (illustration bolow). The availability of natural light (both direct and reflected) and direct sun exposure to nearby buildings and open space (except parking areas) shall be considered when siting structures. Z. Commercial Mixed-use buildings shall contain pedestrian-oriented uses, feature "pedestrian-oriented facades", and have clear connections to the sidewalk (illustration below). ATTACHMENTA-PAGE1OF30 8c. ‐ Urban Design Regulations Code Amendment ‐ Title IV Docket #D‐39  (1st reading 11/8/2010)Page 115 of 195 ORDINANCE NO. '^4 •v. /.!' fit. •-••.',*<i> •^ •<-:. . wetlftstnar..onarisd facade '"'^ P-operty i~c ............ >-W ^ t .JwS,^-Ped»striaii-orlem»d facades; Hitman/tiijilrii.-K: Srilfy •' '"mC must oe faer js the st^est ,1',"&: -jensparerrt window ares orvrindcw • '" tlisfiiay along .-"h'K. :'it twg'ftjfd laar batv-Ben ihe height of 2 to G feet jboc'srhegroird '/rather orotectbr at east •' Y. feat vn'de along at least i'6% x the facade Js-...>:' 1 •' 'i-. ^ -.mst -•&, ..-•-•-.. -•• ^v /••', "%:i/.,>;,3[. 'v-,v..,.' 3. Office buildings shall have If buildings do not foaturo pedestrian-oriented facades7i In limited circumstances the Department may allow facades that do not feature a pedestrian orientation, if so they shall have substantial landscaping between the sidewalk and building shall be provided. Such landscaping shall be at least ten feet (10') in width as measured from the sidewalk (illustration below). /— Raised planters provide privacy for residents wh ile ma inta ining views of the street from units ATTACHMENT A- PAGE 2 OF 30 8c. ‐ Urban Design Regulations Code Amendment ‐ Title IV Docket #D‐39  (1st reading 11/8/2010)Page 116 of 195 ORDINANCE NO. ^a», j? 3 Comb natron ol evorgrseii and c-aciduous sh'ubs arri treas . Building- \ •'/i -r- ' 3& I •— Raised p anter 2r Buildings shall bo locatod abutting the sidewalk, except where podostrianorientod spaco is locatod between tho building and tho sidewalk. Parking between the building and tho stroot is prohibited. 3T Nonresidential buildings may bo locatod directly abutting any stroot as long as thoy feature a pedestrian oriented facado. 43. Residential and mixed-use Sbuildings containing street-level residential uses and single- purpose residential buildings shall bei a. sSet back from the sidewalk a minimum often feet (10') and feature substantial landscaping between the sidewalk and the building (illustration belowK; or b. Have the ground floor residential uses raised above street level for residents' privacy. m )*^£> Comb nation ol evufgrsen and caciduous sh'ubs and treas . Bulbing — "V. ^^s^^^V^c:1 ^ -^ r^ ww>mw^wi' c^siw^s^s^^^g^ptscgjlg^l^ • Raised p anter ATTACHMENT A - PAGE 3 OF 30 8c. ‐ Urban Design Regulations Code Amendment ‐ Title IV Docket #D‐39  (1st reading 11/8/2010)Page 117 of 195 ORDINANCE NO. "^-^H--^, Raised planters provide privacy for residents while maintaining views of the street torn units Trees Intent: To make building entrances convenient to locate and easy to access, and ensure that building entries funh"t Lht_* pedestrian nature of the fronting sidewalk and the urban character of the district. Guidelines: Multiple buildings on tho same site should provide a network of pedestrian paths for acce; within the site and access to tho site from tho surrounding area. For projects that include rosidontial uses, ontrios and/or front yards should provide transition spaco between tho stroot and tho residence. Ground floor units should bo directly acccssiblo from the stroot or an open spaco. Features such as entries, lobbies, and display windows should bo oriented to a street or pedestrian oriontod space; otherwise, screening or docorativo features should bo incorporated. Entries from tho street should bo clearly marked with canopies, architectural clomonts, ornamental lighting, or landscaping. Secondary access (not fronting on a stroot) should bo subordinate to those related to tho street and havo woathor protection. Primary entries shall face the street, serve as a focal point, and allow space for social interaction. All entries shall include features that make them easily identifiable while reflecting the architectural character of the building. The primary entry shall be the most visually prominent entry. Pedestrian access to the building from the sidewalk, parking lots and/or, other areas shall be provided and shall enhance the overall quality of the pedestrian experience on the site. Standards: AH Districts A, B, and 9- All of the following are required: 1. A The primary entrance of each building shall bei a. ILocated on the facade facing a street, shall be prominent, visible from the street, connected by a walkway to the public sidewalk, and include human-scale elements-^ and b. Made visibly prominent by incorporating architectural features such as a facade overhang, trellis, large entry doors, and/or ornamental lighting (illustration below). ATTACHMENT A- PAGE 4 OF 30 8c. ‐ Urban Design Regulations Code Amendment ‐ Title IV Docket #D‐39  (1st reading 11/8/2010)Page 118 of 195 ORDINANCE NO. 3. RECESS OVERHANG TRELLIS PORTICO 2. Multiple buildings on tho same site shall provide a continuous network of podostrian paths and open spaces that incorporate landscaping to provide a directed view to building entries. Building entries from a street shall be clearly marked with canopies, architectural elements, ornamental lighting, or landscaping and include weather protection at least four and one-half feet (434') wide (illustration below). Buildings that are taller than thirty feet (30') in height shall also ensure that the weather protection is proportional to the distance above ground level. Ground floor units shall bo directly accessible from tho stroot or an opon spaco such as a courtyard or garden that is accessible from the street. Building entries from a parking lot shall be subordinate to those related to the street. 4. Secondary access (not fronting on a street) shall havo woathor protection at least four and one half foot (4 1/2') wide over tho entrance or other similar indicator of access. Features such as entries, lobbies, and display windows shall be oriented to a street or pedestrian-oriented space: otherwise, screening or decorative features should be incorporated. 5. Pedestrian access shall bo provided to tho building from property edges, adjacent lots, abutting stroot intorsoctions, crosswalks, and transit stops. Multiple buildings on the ATTACHMENTA-PAGE5OF30 8c. ‐ Urban Design Regulations Code Amendment ‐ Title IV Docket #D‐39  (1st reading 11/8/2010)Page 119 of 195 ORDINANCE NO. same site shall direct views to building entries by providing a continuous network of pedestrian paths and open spaces that incorporate landscaping. (ji Ground floor residential units that are directly accessible from the street shall include a. Entries from front yards to provide transition space from the street, or b. Entries from an open space such as a courtyard or garden that is accessible from the street. District C All of tho following aro requirod: 4T Tho primary entrance of each building shall bo located on the facade facing tho street. 2-r On non pedestrian oriented streets, entrances shall be prominent, visible from surrounding streets, connected by a walkway to the public sidewalk, and include human scale elements. 3v All building entries abutting to a street shall bo clearly marked with canopies, architectural clomonts, ornamental lighting, and/or landscaping (illustration below). Entries from parking lots should bo subordinate to thoso related to tho street. ?^-^if ^TJp7"-- 4T Weather protection at least four and ono half foot (4 1/2') wide shall bo provided over tho primary entry of all buildings and over any entry abutting a street. Buildings that are tailor than thirty feet (30') in height shall also ensure that tho woathor protection is proportional to the distance above ground level. ST Pedestrian pathways from public sidewalks to primary entrances or from parking lots to primary entrances shall be clearly delineated. TRANSITION TO SURROUNDING DEVELOPMENT Intent: To shape redevelopment projects so that the character and value of Renton's long-established, existing neighborhoods are preserved. Guidelines: Careful siting and design treatment should shall be used to achieve a compatible transition where new buildings differ from surrounding development in terms of building height, bulk and scale. Standards: ATTACHMENT A - PAGE 6 OF 30 8c. ‐ Urban Design Regulations Code Amendment ‐ Title IV Docket #D‐39  (1st reading 11/8/2010)Page 120 of 195 ORDINANCE NO. Districts A, B, and D At least one of the following design elements shall be used to promote a transition to surrounding uses: ir Setbacks at the side or rear of a building may be increased by tho Reviewing Official in order to reduce the bulk and scale of larger buildings and/or so that sunlight reaches adjacent and/or abutting yards; or 2-1. Building proportions, including step-backs on upper levels in accordance with the surrounding planned and existing land use forms; or 32. Building articulation to divide a larger architectural element into smaller increments; or 43. Roof lines, roof pitches, and roof shapes designed to reduce apparent bulk and transition with existing development. Additionally, the Administrator of the Department of Community and Economic Development or designee may require increased setbacks at the side or rear of a building in order to reduce the bulk and scale of larger buildings and/or so that sunlight reaches adjacent and/or abutting yards. District C Both of the following are required: 1. For properties along North 6th Street and Logan Avenue North (between North 4th Street and North 6th Street), applicants shall demonstrate how their project provides an appropriate transition to the long-established, existing residential neighborhood south of North 6th Street known as the North Renton Neighborhood. 2. For properties located south of North 8th Street, east of Garden Avenue North, applicants must demonstrate how their project appropriately provides transitions to existing industrial uses. SERVICE ELEMENT LOCATION AND DESIGN Intent: ID n^liiti- the poK-ntiiil in-r^itivi' inip.ii Is of SI-IVH i- i-lem^nts (i i-, .v.jslf ificpTdJus. loeidinr, dot ks) by lo< •Jtirij- SLTVK I- and 'o.iilin,' .IH-JS •iv.'.iy from pcdi>stf MM .m-^s, diul si I'viiinr tlii'in from vii1.*.' in hi;;h visibility itreas Guidelines: Service enclosure fences should bo made of masonry, omamontal motal or wood, or some combination of the three (3). Service elements shall be concentrated and located so that impacts to pedestrians and other abutting uses are minimized. The impacts of service elements shall be mitigated with landscaping and an enclosure with fencing that is made of quality materials. Standards: All Districts All of the following are required: 1. Service elements shall be located and designed to minimize the impacts on the pedestrian environment and adjacent and/or abutting uses. Service elements shall be concentrated and located where they are accessible to service vehicles and convenient for tenant use (illustration below). 2. In addition to standard enclosure requirements, garbage, recycling collection, and utility areas shall be enclosed on all sides, includifige the a_roof and be screened around their perimeter by a wall or fence and have self-closing doors (illustration below). ATTACHMENT A - PAGE 7 OF 30 8c. ‐ Urban Design Regulations Code Amendment ‐ Title IV Docket #D‐39  (1st reading 11/8/2010)Page 121 of 195 ORDINANCE NO. Landscaping Roof enclosure to keep birds out Concrete pad 3. The use of chain link, plastic, or wire fencing is prohibited. Service enclosures shall be made of masonry, ornamental metal or wood, or some combination of the three (3). If the service area is adjacent to a street, pathway, or pedestrian-oriented space, a landscaped planting strip, minimum three feet (3') wide, shall be located on three (3) sides of such facility. GATEWAYS Intent: To distinguish gateways as primary entrances to districts or to the City, special design features and architectural elements at gateways should be provided. While gateways should be distinctive within the context of the district, they should also be compatible with the district in form and scale. Guidelines: Development that occurs at gateways should shall be distinguished with features that visually indicate to both pedestrians and vehicular traffic the uniqueness and prominence of their locations in the City. Examples of these types of features include monuments, public art, and public plazas. Standards: District C and D All of the following are required: 1. Developments located at district gateways shall be marked with visually prominent features (illustration below). ATTACHMENT A - PAGE 8 OF 30 8c. ‐ Urban Design Regulations Code Amendment ‐ Title IV Docket #D‐39  (1st reading 11/8/2010)Page 122 of 195 ORDINANCE NO. •n~ncl llllllHtllMII. QJ . m rxTm mi ca w ra en I 1~T 1 I P rzi ifijtH ^ y m n Eltvailon -oof rs Plan ^/ Nate: Ensurti that building dti&s not bhx;ls clear vislort area aft Intersections. OODOQ DDDDD ,1 IT TTI HHiaaiimiiaft lal Elevation strctlv'7 us* ffr;te-fl = TTT^ B=t- 'V TCv^ Plan 2. Gateway elements shall be oriented toward and scaled for both pedestrians and vehicles (illustration below). 3. Visual prominence shall be distinguished by two (2) or more of the following: a. Public art; b. Special landscape treatment; ATTACHMENT A- PAGE 9 OF 30 8c. ‐ Urban Design Regulations Code Amendment ‐ Title IV Docket #D‐39  (1st reading 11/8/2010)Page 123 of 195 ORDINANCE NO. c. Open space/plaza; d. Landmark building form; e. Special paving, unique pedestrian scale lighting, or bollards; f. Prominent architectural features (trellis, arbor, pergola, or gazebo); g. Neighborhood or district entry identification (commercial signs do not qualify). 2. Parking and Vehicular Access: Intent: To provide safe, convenient access; incorporate various modes of transportation, including public transit, in order to reduce traffic volumes and other impacts from vehicles; ensure sufficient parking is provided, while encouraging creativity in reducing the impacts of parking areas; allow an active pedestrian environment by maintaining contiguous street frontages, without parking lot siting along sidewalks and building facades; minimize the visual impact of parking lots; and use access streets and parking to maintain an urban edge to the district. SURFACE PARKING Intent: To maintain active pedestrian environments along streets by placing parking lots primarily in backot buildings Guidelines: Parking lots should bo located on tho interior portions of blocks and scroonod from tho surrounding roadways by buildings, landscaping, and/or gateway features as dictated by location. A limited number of parking spaces may bo allowable in front of a building, provided thoy are for passenger drop off and pick up and thoy aro parallel to the building facade. Surface parking shall be located and designed so as to reduce the visual impact of the parking area and associated vehicles- Large areas of surface parking shall also be designed to accommodate future infill development. Standards: District A, B, and D Both of ffhe following is are required: l^_Parking shall be located so that no surface parking is located between^ a. a A building and the front property line, and/or the- b. A building and the side property line7 (when on a corner lot), on tho street side of a corner lot. 2. Parking shall be located so that it is screened from surrounding streets by buildings. landscaping, and/or gateway features as dictated by location- Beth All of the following are required: District C 1. Parking shall be at the side and/or rear of a building-and may not occur between the building and the street. However, if due to the constraints of the site, parking cannot be provided at the side or rear of the building, the Administrator of the Department of Community and Economic Development or designee may allow parking to occur between the building and the street. If parking is allowed to occur between the building and the street, no more than sixty feet (60') of the street frontage measured parallel to the curb shall be occupied by off-street parking and vehicular access. 2. Parking shall be located so that it is screened from surrounding streets by buildings, ATTACHMENT A - PAGE 10 OF 30 8c. ‐ Urban Design Regulations Code Amendment ‐ Title IV Docket #D‐39  (1st reading 11/8/2010)Page 124 of 195 ORDINANCE NO. landscaping, and/or gateway features as dictated by location. Surface parking lots shall be designed to facilitate future structured parking and/or other infill development. For example, provision of a parking lot with a minimum dimension on one side of two hundred feet (200') and one thousand five hundred feet (1,500') maximum perimeter area. Exception: If there are size constraints inherent in the original parcel. STRUCTURED PARKING GARAGES Intent: To promote more efficient use of land needed for vehicle parking; encourage the use of structured parking; physically and visually integrate parking garages with other uses; and reduce the overall impac I ol parking (.MM-'I-S Guidelines: Parking garages shall not dominate the streetscape, they shall be designed to be complementary with adjacent and abutting buildings. They shall be sited to complement, not subordinate, pedestrian entries, should not dominate tho streetscape. They should bo designed to be complementary with adjacent and abutting buildings and sited to complomont, not subordinate, the podostrian entry. Similar forms, materials, and/or details to the primary building(s) should shall be used to enhance garages. Tho parking ontry should be locatod away from the primary street, to either tho side or roar of tho building. Parking within the building should bo enclosed or screened. Standards: District C ond D AH Districts All of the following are required: 1. Parking structures shall provide space for ground floor commercial uses along street frontages at a minimum of seventy five percent (75%) of the building frontage width (illustration below). / Parking garage on second floor WML '^ Ground floor commercial space with pedestrian-oriented facade The entire public facing facade must foaturo a shall be pedestrian-oriented facade. The Administrator of the Department of Community and Economic Development may approve parking structures that do not feature a pedestrian orientation in limited ATTACHMENT A- PAGE 11 OF 30 8c. ‐ Urban Design Regulations Code Amendment ‐ Title IV Docket #D‐39  (1st reading 11/8/2010)Page 125 of 195 ORDINANCE NO. circumstances. If allowed, the structure shall be set back at least six feet (6') from the sidewalk and feature substantial landscaping. This landscaping shall include a combination of evergreen and deciduous trees, shrubs, and ground cover. This setback shall be increased to ten feet (10') when abutting a primary arterial and/or minor arterial. Public facing F facades shall bo articulated and vehicular entrances to nonresidential or mixed uso parking structures shall be articulated by arches, lintels, masonry trim, or other architectural elements and/or materials (illustration below). Arflculafon of fecade corn pone nte to seduce scale @nd add visual interest Decorative trellis, structure for vines Raised planting - bed adjacent to sidewalk ®VM fyfJt mm 4. Parking structures not featuring a pedestrian oriontod facade shall bo sot back at least six foot (61) from the sidewalk and feature substantial landscaping. This landscaping shall include a combination of evergreen and deciduous trees, shrubs, and ground cover. This setback shall bo increased to ton foot (10') when abutting high visibility streets. The entry to the parking garage shall be located away from the primary street, to eitherthe side or rear of the building. 5^ Parking garages at grade shall include screening or be enclosed from view with treatment such as walls, decorative grilles, trellis with landscaping, or a combination of treatments. 5-6. The Administrator of the Department of Community and Economic Development or designee may allow a reduced setback where the applicant can successfully demonstrate that the landscaped area and/or other design treatment meets the intent of these standards and guidelines. Possible treatments to reduce the setback include landscaping components plus one or more of the following integrated with the architectural design of the building: a. Ornamental grillwork (other than vertical bars); b. Decorative artwork; c. Display windows; d. Brick, tile, or stone; ATTACHMENT A - PAGE 12 OF 30 8c. ‐ Urban Design Regulations Code Amendment ‐ Title IV Docket #D‐39  (1st reading 11/8/2010)Page 126 of 195 ORDINANCE NO. e. Pre-cast decorative panels; f. Vine-covered trellis; g. Raised landscaping beds with decorative materials; or h. Other treatments that meet the intent of this standard. VEHICULAR ACCESS Intent: To maintain a contiguous and uninterrupted sidewalk by minimizing, consolidating, and/or eliminating vehicular access off streets. Guidelines: Parking lots and garages should bo accessed from alleys or side streets and when accessed from a street, pedestrian circulation along the sidewalk should not bo impeded. Driveways should be located to be visible from the right of way, but not to impede podostrian circulation. Where possible, the number of driveways and curb cuts should bo minimized. Vehicular access to parking garages and parking lots shall not impede or interrupt pedestrian mobility. The impacts of curb cuts to pedestrian access on sidewalks shall be minimized. Standards: Districts A, B, and D The following is required: 1. Access to Pparking lots and garages shall be accessed from alleys, when available. If not available, access shall occur at side streets. 2. The number of driveways and curb cuts shall be minimized, so that pedestrian circulation along the sidewalk is minimally impeded. District C Both of the following are required: 1. Parking garages shall be accessed at the rear of buildings. 2. Parking lot entrances, driveways, and other vehicular access points shall be restricted to one entrance and exit lane per five hundred (500) linear feet as measured horizontally along the street. 3. Pedestrian Environment: Intent: To enhance the urban character of development by creating pedestrian networks and by providing strong links from streets and drives to building entrances; make the pedestrian environment safe, convenient, comfortable, and pleasant to walk between businesses, on sidewalks, to and from access points, and through parking lots; and promote the use of multi- modal and public transportation systems in order to reduce other vehicular traffic. PATHWAYS THROUGH PARKING LOTS Intent; To provide safe and attractive pedestrian connections to buildings, parking garages, and parking ||-|-t«-IU LJ. Guidelines: Pedestrians should be provided with clearly dolinoatod safe routes for travel from thoir vehicle and/or the surrounding area to the building. Standards: Districts Cand D Both of the following aro required: t Clearly delineated podostrian pathways (i.e., raised walkway, stamped concrete, or ATTACHMENT A - PAGE 13 OF 30 8c. ‐ Urban Design Regulations Code Amendment ‐ Title IV Docket #D‐39  (1st reading 11/8/2010)Page 127 of 195 ORDINANCE NO. pavers) and/or private streets shall bo provided throughout parking areas. 2-r Tho pathways shall bo perpendicular to tho applicable building facade and no greater than one hundred and fifty foot (150') apart. PEDESTRIAN CIRCULATION Intent: To create a network of linkages for pedestrians, that is to improve safety and convenience^ afld enhances the pedestrian environment, and provides a way for pedestrians to walk from one location to another without having to drive their vehicle. Guidelines: Pathways should bo provided and should bo delineated by material treatment such as texture, color treatment, and/or stamping. Mid block connections aro desirable. Between buildings and botwoon streets through block connections should bo made. The pedestrian environment shall be given priority and importance in the design of projects. Sidewalks and/or pathways shall be provided and shall provide safe access to buildings from parking areas. Providing pedestrian connections to abutting properties is an important aspect of connectivity and encourages pedestrian activity and shall be considered. Pathways shall be easily identifiable to pedestrians and drivers. Standards: District A, C, and D All of the following are required: 1. Dovolopments shall include an integrated podostrian circulation system that connects buildings, opon space, and parking areas with tho sidewalk system and abutting properties. A pedestrian circulation system of pathways that are clearly delineated and connect buildings, open space, and parking areas with the sidewalk system and abutting properties shall be provided. 3T a. Pathways shall be located so that there are clear sight lines, to increase safety. b. Pathways shall be an all-weather or permeable walking surface, unless the applicant can demonstrate that the proposed surface is appropriate for the anticipated number of users and complementary to the design of the development. ^ Sidewalks located between buildings and streets shall bo raised above tho lovol of vehicular travel. 42. Podostrian pPathways within parking lots or parking modules areas shall be provided and differentiated by material or texture (i.e. raised walkway, stamped concrete, or pavers) from abutting paving materials (illustration below). Permeable materials are encouraged. The pathways shall be perpendicular to the applicable building facade and no greater than one hundred fifty feet (150') apart. ATTACHMENT A - PAGE 14 OF 30 8c. ‐ Urban Design Regulations Code Amendment ‐ Title IV Docket #D‐39  (1st reading 11/8/2010)Page 128 of 195 ORDINANCE NO. mm* \ -%3K3fe£ i:~z. 53. Sidewalks and pathways along the facades of buildings shall be of sufficient width to accommodate anticipated numbers of users. Specifically: a. Sidewalks and pathways along the facades of mixed use and retail buildings one hundred (100) or more feet in width (measured along the facade) shall provide sidewalks at least twelve feet (12') in width. The walkway pathway shall include an eight-foot (8') minimum unobstructed walking surface. b. Interior pathways shall be provided and shall vary in width to establish a hierarchy. The widths shall be based on the intended number of usersjj, to be no smaller than five feet (5') and no greater than twelve feet (12'). €4. All podostrian walkways shall provide an all woathor walking surface unless tho applicant can demonstrate that tho proposed surface is appropriate for tho anticipated number of users and complementary to tho design of tho dovolopmont. Mid-block connections between buildings shall be provided. PEDESTRIAN AMENITIES Intent: To create attractive spaces that unify the building and street environments and are inviting and comfortable for pedestrians; and provide publicly accessible areas that function for a variety of year- round activities, under typical seasonal weather conditions. Guidelines: Amenities such as outdoor group seating, kiosks, fountains, and public art should bo provided. Amenities such as transit shelters, benches, trash rocoptaclos, and street furniture should also bo provided. Architectural clomonts that incorporate plants, particularly at building entrances, in publicly acccssiblo spaces, and at facades along streets should bo included (illustration below). The pedestrian environment shall be given priority and importance in the design of projects. Amenities that encourage pedestrian use and enhance the pedestrian experience shall be included. ATTACHMENT A - PAGE 15 OF 30 8c. ‐ Urban Design Regulations Code Amendment ‐ Title IV Docket #D‐39  (1st reading 11/8/2010)Page 129 of 195 ORDINANCE NO. Recessed entry Seasonal landscaping Transp arent wind crsvs Vfeather protection Trass and areet featu-ea wsed to define pedestrian area Varied Si PEdestrian crisntcd signage Standards: District B Beth All of the following are required: 1. Architectural elements that incorporate plants, particularly at building entrances, in publicly accessible spaces and at facades along streets, shall be provided. 2. Amenities such as outdoor group seating, benches, transit shelters, fountains, and public art shall be provided. j^a. Site furniture shall bo provided and shall be made of durable, vandal- and weather-resistant materials that do not retain rainwater and can be reasonably maintained over an extended period of time. 2-rb. Site furniture and amenities shall not impede or block pedestrian access to public spaces or building entrances. All of the following are required: 1. Architectural elements that incorporate plants, particularly at building entrances, in publicly accessible spaces and at facades along streets, shall be provided. 2. Amenities such as outdoor group seating, benches, transit shelters, fountains, and District C and D 3. public art shall be provided. j^-a. Site furniture shall bo provided and shall be made of durable, vandal- and weather-resistant materials that do not retain rainwater and can be reasonably maintained over an extended period of time. 2-rb. Site furniture and amenities shall not impede or block pedestrian access to public spaces or building entrances. Pedestrian overhead weather protection in the form of awnings, marquees, canopies, or building overhangs shall be provided. These elements shall be a minimum of four and one-half feet (4-1/2') wide along at least seventy five percent (75%) of the length of the building facade facing the street, a maximum height of fifteen feet (15') above ATTACHMENT A - PAGE 16 OF 30 8c. ‐ Urban Design Regulations Code Amendment ‐ Title IV Docket #D‐39  (1st reading 11/8/2010)Page 130 of 195 ORDINANCE NO. the ground elevation, and no lower than eight feet (8') above ground level. 4. Recreation Areas and Common Open Space: RECREATION AREAS AND COMMON OPEN SPACE Intent: To ensure that areas for both passive and active recreation are available to residents, workers, and visitors and that these areas are of sufficient size for the intended activity and in convenient locations. To create usable and inviting open space that is accessible to the public; and to promote pedestrian activity on streets particularly at street corners. Guidelines: Common spaco should bo locatod to tako advantage of surrounding features such as significant landscaping, unique topography or architecture, and solar exposure. Developments located at street intersections should provide pedestrian-oriented space at the street corner to emphasize pedestrian activity (illustration below). Projects that include residential, common spaco and children's play areas should bo centrally located near a majority of dwelling units and visible from surrounding units. Play areas should also be away from hazardous areas like garbage dumpstors, drainage facilities, stroots. and parking areas. Recreation and common open space areas are integral aspects of quality development that encourage pedestrians and users. These areas shall be provided in an amount that is adequate to be functional and usable: they shall also be landscaped and located so that they are appealing to users and pedestrians. Corner entry with increased setback Standards: District A,C, and D Both of the following are required: 1. All mixed use residential and attached housing developments often (10) or more dwelling units shall provide common opens space and/or recreation areas. a. Amount to bo provided: aAt minimum fifty (50) square feet per unit shall be provided. b. The location, layout, and proposed type of common space or recreation area shall be subject to approval by the Administrator of the Department of Community and Economic Development or designee. c. Open space or recreation areas shall be located to provide sun and light exposure to ATTACHMENT A-PAGE 17 OF 30 8c. ‐ Urban Design Regulations Code Amendment ‐ Title IV Docket #D‐39  (1st reading 11/8/2010)Page 131 of 195 ORDINANCE NO. the area and located so that they are aggregated to provide usable area(s) for residents. d. Opon spaco or rocroation area required elements. At least one of the following shall be provided in each open space and/or recreation area (the Administrator of the Department of Community and Economic Development or designee may require more than one of the following elements for developments having more than one hundred (100) units). i. Courtyards, plazas, pea patches, or multi-purpose open spaces; ii. Upper level common decks, patios, terraces, or roof gardens/pea patches. Such spaces above the street level must feature views or amenities that are unique to the site and are provided as an asset to the development; iii. Pedestrian corridors dedicated to passive recreation and separate from the public street system; iv. Recreation facilities including, but not limited to, tennis/sports courts, swimming pools, exercise areas, game rooms, or other similar facilities; or v. Children's play spaces that are centrally located near a majority of dwelling units and visible from surrounding units. They shall also be located away from hazardous areas such as garbage dumpsters, drainage facilities, and parking areas. e. The following shall not be counted toward the common open space or recreation area requirement: i. Required landscaping, driveways, parking, or other vehicular use areasj; ii. Required yard setback areas. Except for areas that are developed as private or semi- private (from abutting or adjacent properties) courtyards, plazas or passive use areas containing landscaping and fencing sufficient to create a fully usable area accessible to all residents of the development (illustration below)^ ATTACHMENT A - PAGE 18 OF 30 8c. ‐ Urban Design Regulations Code Amendment ‐ Title IV Docket #D‐39  (1st reading 11/8/2010)Page 132 of 195 ORDINANCE NO. v-i-. H. >"x ^ T ii i ,j iii. Private decks, balconies, and private ground floor open space; and^ iv. Other required landscaping and sensitive area buffers without common access links, such as pedestrian trails. 2. All buildings and developments with over thirty thousand (30,000) square feet of nonresidential uses (excludes parking garage floorplate areas) shall provide pedestrian- oriented space. a. The pedestrian-oriented space shall be provided according to the following formula: 1% of the site area + 1% of the gross building area, at minimum. b. The pedestrian-oriented space shall include all of the following: i. Visual and pedestrian access (including barrier-free access) to the abutting structures from the public right-of-way or a nonvehicular courtyard; and ii. Paved walking surfaces of either concrete or approved unit paving; and iii. On-site or building-mounted lighting providing at least four (4) foot-candles (average) on the ground; and iv. At least three (3) lineal feet of seating area (bench, ledge, etc.) or one individual seat per sixty (60) square feet of plaza area or open space. c. The following areas shall not count as pedestrian-oriented space: i. The minimum required walkway. However, where walkways are widened or enhanced beyond minimum requirements, the area may count as pedestrian- oriented space if the Administrator of the Department of Community and Economic Development or designee determines such space meets the definition of pedestrian-oriented space. ATTACHMENT A- PAGE 19 OF 30 8c. ‐ Urban Design Regulations Code Amendment ‐ Title IV Docket #D‐39  (1st reading 11/8/2010)Page 133 of 195 ORDINANCE NO. ii. Areas that abut landscaped parking lots, chain link fences, blank walls, and/or dumpsters or service areas. d. Outdoor storage (shopping carts, potting soil bags, firewood, etc.) that docs not contribute to tho podostrian environment is prohibited within pedestrian-oriented space. District B The following is required: All attached housing developments shall provide at least one hundred fifty (150) square feet of private usable space per unit. 1. At least one hundred (100) square feet of the private space shall abut each unit. 2. Private space may include porches, balconies, yards, and decks. All Districts All of the following are required: 1. At each corner of tho intersections listed below, a public plaza shall be provided. Public plazas shall be provided at intersections identified in the Commercial Arterial Zone Public Plaza Locations Map and as listed below. 2. The plaza shall measure no less than one thousand (1,000) square feet with a minimum dimension of twenty feet (20') on one side abutting the sidewalk. 3. The public plaza must be landscaped consistent with RMC 4-4-070, including at minimum street trees, decorative paving, pedestrian-scaled lighting, and seating. 4. These pPublic plazas are to be provided at the following intersections: identified on tho 1 Artorial Zono Public Plaza Locations Map. Those locations aro at all of tho Commercial Artonal Zono following intorsoctions: a. Benson Area: Benson Drive S./108th Avenue S.E. and S.E. 176th. b. Bronson Area: Intersections with Bronson Way North at: i. Factory Avenue N./Houser Way S.; ii. Garden Avenue N.; and iii. Park Avenue N. and N. First Street. c. Cascade Area: Intersection of 116th Avenue S.E. and S.E. 168th Street. d. Northeast Fourth Area: Intersections with N.E. Fourth at: i. Duvall Avenue N.E.; ii. Monroe Avenue N.E.; and iii. Union Avenue N.E. e. Grady Area: Intersections with Grady Way at: i. Lind Avenue S.W.; ii. Rainier Avenue S.; ATTACHMENT A - PAGE 20 OF 30 8c. ‐ Urban Design Regulations Code Amendment ‐ Title IV Docket #D‐39  (1st reading 11/8/2010)Page 134 of 195 ORDINANCE NO. iii. Shattuck Avenue S.; and iv. Talbot Road S. f. Puget Area: Intersection of S. Puget Drive and Benson Road S. g. Rainier Avenue Area: Intersections with Rainier Avenue S. at: i. Airport Way/Renton Avenue S.; ii. S. Second Street; iii. S. Third Street/S.W. Sunset Boulevard; iv. S. Fourth Street; and v. S. Seventh Street, h. North Renton Area: Intersections with Park Avenue N. at: i. N. Fourth Street; and ii. N. Fifth Street, i. Northeast Sunset Area: Intersections with N.E. Sunset Boulevard at: i. Duvall Avenue N.E.; and ii. Union Avenue N.E. 5. Building Architectural Design: Intent: To encourage building design that is unique and urban in character, comfortable on a human scale, and uses appropriate building materials that are suitable for the Pacific Northwest climate and to discourage franchise retail architecture. BUILDING CHARACTER AND MASSING Intent: To rnsuic th.il buildings .HI- not bidiui and so tlicit 1ln>y uppe.it to he .it a human suit1 .is well as to L'lisinc that .ill side, of a buildine, v.hich ran hi' "-I'l-n by'.In- publn, >iii' visu.illy interesting. Guidelines: Building facades should shall be modulated and/or articulated to reduce the apparent size of buildings, break up long blank walls, add visual interest, and enhance the character of the neighborhood. Articulation, modulation, and their intervals should create a sense of scale important to residential buildings. Buildings greater than one hundred and sixty feet (160') in length should provide a variety of modulations and articulations to reduce the apparent bulk and scale of the facade (illustration bolow); or provide an additional special design feature such as a clock towor, courtyard, fountain, or public gathering. ATTACHMENT A - PAGE 21 OF 30 8c. ‐ Urban Design Regulations Code Amendment ‐ Title IV Docket #D‐39  (1st reading 11/8/2010)Page 135 of 195 ORDINANCE NO. aAAAAAAAx More tisn 1K' hE-nrJn r. ton hrg Meets yt idelii* Standards: District A and D Both of the following are required: 1. All building facades shall include modulation or articulation at intervals of no more than forty feet (40'). 2. Modulations shall be a minimum of two feet (2') deep, sixteen feet (16') in height, and eight feet (8') in width. 3. Buildings greater than one hundred sixty feet (160') in length shall provide a variety of modulations and articulations to reduce the apparent bulk and scale of the facade (illustration in District B, below); or provide an additional special feature such as a clock tower, courtyard, fountain, or public gathering area. District B Beth All of the following are required: 1. All building facades shall include modulation or articulation at intervals of no more than twenty feet (20'). 2. Modulations shall be a minimum of two feet (2') in depth and four feet (4') in width. 3. Buildings greater than one hundred sixty feet in length shall provide a variety of modulations and articulations to reduce the apparent bulk and scale of the facade (illustration below): or provide an additional special design feature such as a clock tower, courtyard, fountain or public gathering area. ATTACHMENT A - PAGE 22 OF 30 8c. ‐ Urban Design Regulations Code Amendment ‐ Title IV Docket #D‐39  (1st reading 11/8/2010)Page 136 of 195 ORDINANCE NO. in IJJ II gnJ 'dore tisn 16v' r-«-nrtn stivi long Metis gt iUelire District C All of the following are required: 1. All building facades shall include measures to reduce the apparent scale of the building and add visual interest. Examples include modulation, articulation, defined entrances, and display windows (illustration below). ^ 2. INTERVAL i INTERVAL All buildings shall be articulated with one or more of the following: a. Defined entry features; Bay windows and/or balconies; Roof line features; or Other features as approved by the Administrator of the Department of Community and Economic Development or designee. 3. Single purpose residential buildings shall feature building modulation as follows ATTACHMENT A- PAGE 23 OF 30 8c. ‐ Urban Design Regulations Code Amendment ‐ Title IV Docket #D‐39  (1st reading 11/8/2010)Page 137 of 195 ORDINANCE NO. (illustration below): a. The maximum width (as measured horizontally along the building's exterior) without building modulation shall be forty feet (40'). b. c. The minimum width of modulation shall be fifteen feet (15'). The minimum depth of modulation shall be greater than six feet (6'). &. CUlrfvbJ l ucfli'is - i- .-i ^ J,'rr=tf B ijau.wsl -xrice <2dd v.^ual r:s-eri cr A 3:'.-fi :-ia ti.il trif j M.ri«n s<a f FUl.-lmglft HTC%1IIIT.I.1 r.rccs r srrf &jt h.-i r.il C-.'JC- --\?. ii:;'!viv"ij' a' liiw v: J= v.-dll 4. All buildings greater than one hundred sixty feet (160') in length shall provide a variety of modulations and articulations to reduce the apparent bulk and scale of the facade (as illustrated in District B above): or provide an additional special design feature such as a clock tower, courtyard, fountain, or public gathering area. GROUND LEVEL DETAILS Intent: To ensure that buildings are visually interesting and reinforce the intended human-scale character of the pedestrian environment; and ensure that all sides of a building within near or distant public view have visual interest. Guidelines: The use of material variations such as colors, brick, shingles, stucco, and horizontal wood siding is encouraged. The primary building entrance should be made visibly prominent by incorporating architectural features such as a facade overhang, trellis, large entry doors, and/or ornamental lighting (illustration below). Detail features should also be used, to include things such as decorative entry paving, street furniture (benches, etc.), and/or public art. ATTACHMENT A - PAGE 24 OF 30 8c. ‐ Urban Design Regulations Code Amendment ‐ Title IV Docket #D‐39  (1st reading 11/8/2010)Page 138 of 195 ORDINANCE NO. RECESS OVERHANG CANOPY TREJ.I3 PORTICO PORCI- Standards: All Districts All of the following are required: 1. Human-scaled elements such as a lighting fixture, trellis, or other landscape feature shall be provided along the facade's ground floor. 2. ©fl-aAny facade visible to the public, shall be comprised of at least fifty percent (50%) transparent windows and/or doors aro required to comprise at least fifty porcont (50%) ef for at least the portion of the ground floor facade that is between four feet (4') and eight feet (8') above ground (as measured on the true elevation). 3. Upper portions of Bbuilding facades must shall have clear windows with visibility into and out of the building. However, screening may be applied to provide shade and energy efficiency. The minimum amount of light transmittance for windows shall be fifty percent (50%). Display windows shall be designed for frequent change of merchandise, rather than permanent displays. Where windows or storefronts occur, they must principally contain clear glazing. All of the following are prohibited: 1. Tinted and dark glass, highly reflective (mirror-type) glass and film. 2. Untreated blank walls visible from public streets, sidewalks, or interior pedestrian pathways. a. A wall (including building facades and retaining walls) is considered a blank wall if: i. It is a ground floor wall or portion of a ground floor wall over six feet (6') in height, has a horizontal length greater than fifteen feet (15'), and does not include a window, door, building modulation or other architectural detailing; or ATTACHMENT A- PAGE 25 OF 30 8c. ‐ Urban Design Regulations Code Amendment ‐ Title IV Docket #D‐39  (1st reading 11/8/2010)Page 139 of 195 ORDINANCE NO. ii. Any portion of a ground floor wall has a surface area of four hundred (400) square feet or greater and does not include a window, door, building modulation or other architectural detailing. b. If blank walls are required or unavoidable, they shall be treated. The treatment shall be proportional to the wall and use one or more of the following (illustration below): i. A planting bed at least five feet (5') in width abutting the blank wall that containtRgs trees, shrubs, evergreen ground cover, or vines abutting tho blank \j\r~\ II* ii. Trellis or other vine supports with evergreen climbing vines; iii. Architectural detailing such as reveals, contrasting materials, or other special detailing that meets the intent of this standard; iv. Artwork, such as bas-relief sculpture, mural, or similar; or v. Seating area with special paving and seasonal planting. 4& .- TraHis with vines or other plants Min, 5'wide planting bed and materials to caver 50% of wall within 3 years BUILDING ROOF LINES Intent: To ensure that roof forms provide distinctive profiles and interest consistent with an urban project and contribute to the visual continuity of the district. Guidelines: Building roof lines should shall be varied and include architectural elements to add visual interest to the building. Roofs should bo dark in color. Roof mounted mochanical equipment should not bo visible to pedostrians. Buildings containing predominantly residential uses should have pitched roofs with a minimum slope of one to four (1:4) and should havo dormers or intersecting roof forms that break up tho massivenoss of an uninterrupted sloping roof. Standards: District A, C, and D The following is required: At least one of the following elements shall be used to create varied and interesting roof profiles (illustration below): ATTACHMENT A- PAGE 26 OF 30 8c. ‐ Urban Design Regulations Code Amendment ‐ Title IV Docket #D‐39  (1st reading 11/8/2010)Page 140 of 195 ORDINANCE NO. 1. Extended parapets; 2. Feature elements projecting above parapets; 3. Projected cornices; 4. Pitched or sloped roofs. Fxt^rdrd parapsK Feature eternal projecthg ahw.'e pa^pets :i I ! t*ro ectM ccmioe* pnohed ar sbpss root* AY I1 K i I ! 5. Roof mounted mechanical equipment shall not be visible to pedestrians. (x Buildings containing predominantly residential uses shall have pitched roofs with a minimum slope of one to four (1:4) and shall have dormers or interesting roof forms that break up the massiveness of an uninterrupted sloping roof. BUILDING MATERIALS Intent: To ensure high standards of quality and effective maintenance over time and encourage the use of materials that reduce the visual bulk of large buildings, as well as to encourage the use of materials that add visual interest to the neighborhood. Guidelines: Buildings should use material variations such as colors, brick or metal banding or patterns, or textural changes. Building materials should be attractive, durable, and consistent with moro traditional urban dovolopmont, such as brick, integrally colorod concrete masonry, pro finished motal, stono, stool, glass, and cast in placo concrete. If concrete is used, walls should bo enhanced by techniques such as texturing, rovoals, and/or coloring with a concrete coating or admixture. If concrete block walls are used, thoy should bo enhanced with integral color, textured blocks and colorod mortar, docorativo bond pattern and/or incorporate other masonry materials. Building materials are an important and integral part of the architectural design of a building that is attractive and of high quality- Material variation shall be used to create visual appeal and eliminate monotony of facades. This shall occur on all facades in a consistent manner. High quality materials shall be used. If materials like concrete or block walls are used they shall be enhanced to create variation and enhance their visual appeal. Standards: ATTACHMENT A - PAGE 27 OF 30 8c. ‐ Urban Design Regulations Code Amendment ‐ Title IV Docket #D‐39  (1st reading 11/8/2010)Page 141 of 195 ORDINANCE NO. All Districts All of the following are required: 1. All sides of buildings visible from a street, pathway, parking area, or open space shall be finished with the same building materials, detailing, and color scheme. A different treatment may be used if the materials are of the same quality. 2. All buildings shall use material variations such as colors, brick or metal banding, patterns or textural changes. 2-3. Materials, individually or in combination, shall have texture, pattern, and be detailed on all visible facades. 34. Materials shall be durable, high quality, and reasonably maintained consistent with more traditional urban development, such as brick, integrally colored concrete masonry, pre-finished metal, stone, steel, glass and cast-in-place concrete. 5; If concrete is used, walls shall be enhanced by techniques such as texturing, reveals, and/or coloring with a concrete coating or admixture. 6. If concrete block walls are used, they shall be enhanced with integral color, textured blocks and colored mortar, decorative bond pattern and/or shall incorporate other masonry materials. Districts A, C, and D The following is required: All buildings shall use material variations such as colors, brick or metal banding, patterns, or textural changes. 6. Signage: In addition to the City's standard sign regulations, developments within Urban Design Districts C and D are also subject to the additional sign restrictions found in RMC 4-4-100E.5.g, Urban Design Sign Area Regulations. Modifications to the standard requirements found in RMC 4-4-100E.5.g are possible for those proposals that can comply with the Design District criteria found in RMC 4-3-100F, Modification of Minimum Standards. For proposals unable to meet the modification criteria, a variance is required. SIGNAGE intent: 1 o flf-ovide-a-moans of identifying and-advurti'jing bmingssvi; p+evwkMiifectioiMJ dViistoiK-e- eneeufrftf*-!,ifW'' that-are-both clear jn4of-ttpf>foprwte s< <il*>-f<>r-t-he-pfeject: encourage quality si{;r"Mfte t hat conlfibutevto the character of the- Cityi-and croato coior-awi tr+teFeitv Guidolinos: Front lit, ground mounted monument signs are tho preferred typo of freestanding sign. Blade typo signs, proportional to the building facade on which thoy aro mounted, aro encouraged on podostrian oriontod streets. Alteration of trademarks notwithstanding, corporate signage should not bo garish in color nor overly lit, although creativo design, strong accont colors, and interesting surface materials and lighting tochniques aro oncouragod. Standards ATTACHMENT A - PAGE 28 OF 30 8c. ‐ Urban Design Regulations Code Amendment ‐ Title IV Docket #D‐39  (1st reading 11/8/2010)Page 142 of 195 ORDINANCE NO. District Cand D All of tho following aro required: •IT Signage shall bo an integral part of the design approach to tho building. 2-r Entry signs shall bo limited to tho name of tho larger dovolopmont. 3T Corporate logos and signs shall bo sized appropriately for thoir location. 4T In mixed uso and multi uso buildings, signage shall bo coordinated with tho overall building design. Froostanding ground related monument signs, with tho exception of primary entry signs, shall be limited to five foot (5') abovo finished grado, including support structure. All such signs shall include decorative landscaping (ground covor and/or shrubs) to provide seasonal interest in tho area surrounding tho sign. Alternately, signage may incorporate stono, brick, or other docorativo materials as approved by tho Administrator of tho Dopartmont of Community and Economic Dovolopmont or designee. All of tho following aro prohibited: •IT Polo signs. 2-r Roof signs. 3T Back lit signs with letters or graphics on a plastic shoot (can signs or illuminated cabinet signs). Excoptions: Back lit logo signs loss than ton (10) square foot aro permitted, as aro signs with only tho individual letters back lit (illustration bolow). Typical "can signs" are not acceptable Internally lit letters or graphics are acceptable Plastic or — translucent sheet Sheet metal box Only the individual letters are lit 7. Lighting: LIGHTING Intent: To ensure safety and security; provide adequate lighting levels in pedestrian areas such as plazas, pedestrian walkways, parking areas, building entries, and other public places; and increase the ; visual attractiveness of the area at all times of the day and night. Guidelines: Accent lighting should be provided at focal points such as gateways, public art, and ATTACHMENT A - PAGE 29 OF 30 8c. ‐ Urban Design Regulations Code Amendment ‐ Title IV Docket #D‐39  (1st reading 11/8/2010)Page 143 of 195 ORDINANCE NO. significant landscape features such as specimen trees. Additional lighting to provide interest in the pedestrian environment may include sconces on building facades, awnings with down lighting, riomrntivn street lighting, otc. Lighting that improves pedestrian safety and also that creates visual interest in the building and site during the evening hours shall be provided. Standards: District A, C, and D All of the following are required: 1. Pedestrian-scale lighting shall be provided at primary and secondary building entrances. Examples include sconces on building facades, awnings with down-lighting and decorative street lighting. 2. Accent flighting shall also be provided on building facades (such as sconces) and/or to illuminate other key elements of the site such as gateways, specimen trees, other significant landscaping, water features, and/or artwork. 3. Downlighting shall be used in all cases to assure safe pedestrian and vehicular movement, unless alternative pedestrian scale lighting has been approved administratively or is specifically listed as exempt from provisions located in RMC 4-4- 075, Lighting, Exterior On-Site (i.e., signage, governmental flags, temporary holiday or decorative lighting, right-of-way-lighting, etc.). ATTACHMENT A - PAGE 30 OF 30 8c. ‐ Urban Design Regulations Code Amendment ‐ Title IV Docket #D‐39  (1st reading 11/8/2010)Page 144 of 195 st Af/tW,^J* //-T-AOIO Al^y^rif CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON ORDINANCE NO. AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON, AMENDING SUBSECTIONS 4-2-020l.2.a, "F" (MULTI-FAMILY), AND 4-2-110D, CONDITIONS ASSOCIATED WITH DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS TABLE FOR RESIDENTIAL ZONING DESIGNATIONS, OF CHAPTER 2, ZONING DISTRICTS - USES AND STANDARDS, AND SUBSECTIONS 4-9-065A, PURPOSE, AND 4-9-065D, BONUS ALLOWANCES AND REVIEW CRITERIA, OF CHAPTER 9, PERMITS - SPECIFIC, OF TITLE IV (DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS) OF ORDINANCE NO. 4260 ENTITLED "CODE OF GENERAL ORDINANCES OF THE CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON", TO ALLOW DENSITY BONUSES IN THE RESIDENTIAL MULTI-FAMILY ZONE. i ,J - m (! WHEREAS, the intent of the Residential Multi family Comprehensive Plan designation is to provide shelter for a wide variety of people in differing living situations, from all income levels, and in all stages of life; and WHEREAS, density bonuses are authorized in the Renton Municipal Code in order to further the intent of Comprehensive Plan policies, including but not limited to Land Use and Housing Element policies and the purpose and intent of the zoning districts; and WHEREAS, it is appropriate to allow a density bonus in the Residential Multi-Family (RMF) zone provided that criteria such as provision of affordable housing and the use of building practices that minimize their environmental impact are met; and WHEREAS, this matter was duly referred to the Planning Commission for investigation, study, and the matter having been duly considered by the Planning Commission, and the zoning text amendment request being in conformity with the City's Comprehensive Plan, as amended; and 8d. ‐ Density Bonuses in Multi‐Family Zone Code Amendment ‐ Title IV  Docket #D‐40 (1st reading 11/8/2010)Page 145 of 195 ORDINANCE NO. WHEREAS, the Planning Commission held a public hearing on July 7, 2010, having duly considered all matters relevant thereto, and all parties having been heard appearing in support or opposition; NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON, DOES ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS: SECTION I. Subsection 4-2-0201.2.a, "F" (Multi-Family), of Chapter 2, Zoning Districts - Uses and Standards, of Title IV (Development Regulations) of Ordinance No. 4260 entitled "Code of General Ordinances of the City of Renton, Washington", is hereby amended as follows: a. "F" (Multi-Family): The RM-F suffix allows for the development of both infill parcels in existing multi-family districts with compatible projects and other multi-family development. Densityies ranges from ten (10) to twenty (20) du/acre with opportunities for bonuses up to twenty-five (25) dwelling units per net acre. SECTION II. Subsection 4-2-110D, Conditions Associated with Development Standards Table for Residential Zoning Designations, of Chapter 2, Zoning Districts - Uses and Standards, of Title IV (Development Regulations) of Ordinance No. 4260 entitled "Code of General Ordinances of the City of Renton, Washington", is hereby amended to add a new subsection 29 to read as follows: 29. The density bonus may allow up to twenty five (25) dwelling units per acre within the RM-F Zone pursuant to requirements in RMC 4-9-065. 8d. ‐ Density Bonuses in Multi‐Family Zone Code Amendment ‐ Title IV  Docket #D‐40 (1st reading 11/8/2010)Page 146 of 195 ORDINANCE NO. SECTION III. Subsection 4-9-065A, Purpose, of Chapter 9, Permits - Specific, of Title IV (Development Regulations) of Ordinance No. 4260 entitled "Code of General Ordinances of the City of Renton, Washington", is hereby amended as follows: A. PURPOSE: The purpose of the density bonus review is to provide a procedure to review requests for density bonuses authorized in chapter 4-2 RMC. Density bonuses are offered to meet the intent of the Comprehensive Plan policies, including but not limited to Land Use and Housing Element policies and the purpose and intent of the zoning districts. These bonus provisions are intended to allow greater flexibility in the implementation of the purpose of the zones in which density bonuses are allowed. Bonus criteria encourage higher amenity neighborhoods, affordable housing, building practices that minimize the environmental impacts of buildings, mixed use development, aggregated open space, superior architecture and site design, and/or significant environmental enhancement/restoration. Bonus provisions for assisted living are intended to allow assisted living to develop with higher densities, but within a building footprint and scale of building that would be expected for other multi-family structures in the applicable zone. It is expected that all density bonuses will be achieved with no variances to the development regulations of the applicable zone. SECTION IV. Subsection 4-9-065D, Bonus Allowances and Review Criteria, of Chapter 9, Permits - Specific, of Title IV (Development Regulations) of Ordinance No. 4260 entitled 8d. ‐ Density Bonuses in Multi‐Family Zone Code Amendment ‐ Title IV  Docket #D‐40 (1st reading 11/8/2010)Page 147 of 195 ORDINANCE NO. "Code of General Ordinances of the City of Renton, Washington", is hereby amended as shown in Attachment A. SECTION V. This ordinance shall be effective upon its passage, approval, and five (5) days after publication. PASSED BY THE CITY COUNCIL this day of , 2010. Approved as to form: Lawrence J. Warren, City Attorney Date of Publication: ORD:1668:9/23/10:scr Bonnie I. Walton, City Clerk APPROVED BY THE MAYOR this day of : , 2010. Denis Law, Mayor 8d. ‐ Density Bonuses in Multi‐Family Zone Code Amendment ‐ Title IV  Docket #D‐40 (1st reading 11/8/2010)Page 148 of 195 ORDINANCE NO. 4-9-065 D. BONUS ALLOWANCES AND REVIEW CRITERIA The following table lists the conditions under which additional density or alternative bulk standards may be achieved: Density and Unit Sizo Bonus—Purpose: R-14 ZONE The bonus provisions are intended to allow greater flexibility in the implementation of the purpose of tho R-14 designation. Bonus criteria encourage higher amenity neighborhoods and affordable housing. RMFZONE RM-U ZONE The bonus provisions aro intended to allow greater densities within tho portion of tho RM U zono located within the Urban Design District and north of South 2nd Street for those development proposals that provide high quality design amenities. COR ZONE The bonus provisions aro intended to allow greater densities within the COR zono. Bonus criteria encourage affordable housing, mixod uso development, aggregated opon spaco, superior architecture and site design, and significant environmental enhancement and/or restoration. Applicants requesting such bonuses must demonstrate that the same or bettor results will occur as a result of creative design solutions that would occur with uses developed ASSISTED LIVING The bonus provisions are intended to allow assisted living to develop with higher densities, but with a building footprint and scale of building that would bo expected for othor multi family structures in tho applicable applicable zono. It i expected that tho densi sity bor nus wi achieved with no H-be -4he variances to development regulations of tho applicable zone. ATTACHMENT A - Page 1 of 5 8 d .   ‐   D e n s i t y   B o n u s e s   i n   M u l t i ‐ F a m i l y   Z o n e   C o d e   A m e n d m e n t   ‐   T i t l e   I V   D o c k e t   # D ‐ 4 0   ( 1 s t   r e a d i n g   1 1 / 8 / 2 0 1 0 ) P a g e 1 4 9 o f 1 9 5 ORDINANCE NO. Maximum Additional Units Per Acre: Dwelling Unit Mix/Arrangement: Bonus Criteria: i Up to 4 additional dwelling units per net acre. Densities of greater than 18 units per net acre are prohibited. NA To qualify for the density bonus, the applicant shall provide either: (i) Alley and/or rear access and parking for 50% of detached ortownhouse units, or (ii) Civic uses such as a community Up to 5 dwelling units per net acre. Densities of greater than 25 dwelling units per net acre are prohibited. NA To qualify for the density bonus, the applicant shall first provide 1 affordable housing unit, either for sale or rental, (per net acre). Additional bonus units (per net acre) maybe achieved on a 1:1 ratio for either: Up to 25 dwelling units per net acre. Densities of greater than 100 dwelling units per net acre are prohibited. NA Development projects within the applicable area that meet both the "Minimum requirements" and at least one "Guideline" in each of the following four categories: • Building Siting under standard criteria. Up to 25 dwelling units per net acre. Densities of greater than 75 dwelling units per net acre are prohibited. NA To qualify for bonus density the applicant shall provide either: (i) Affordable Housing: 20% or more of the proposed dwelling units within the development are affordable to low income households, The units in a project that are for assisted living are allowed to develop at 1.5 times the maximum density of the zone the project is in. In the R-l and R-10 zones the maximum density for assisted living shall be 18 units/net acre. Projects that include both assisted living and independent living may only apply the density bonus ratio to the units that are built as assisted living units. Assisted living units must be designated for people who are at least 55 years of age. The definitions of Assisted Living in RMC 4-11-010 and Dwelling Multi- Family, Assisted Living in RMC 4-11- 040 must be met. ATTACHMENT A - Page 2 of 5 8 d .   ‐   D e n s i t y   B o n u s e s   i n   M u l t i ‐ F a m i l y   Z o n e   C o d e   A m e n d m e n t   ‐   T i t l e   I V   D o c k e t   # D ‐ 4 0   ( 1 s t   r e a d i n g   1 1 / 8 / 2 0 1 0 ) P a g e 1 5 0 o f 1 9 5 ORDINANCE NO. meeting hall, senior center, recreation center, or other similar uses as determined by the Administrator, or (iii) A minimum of 2 units of affordable housing per net developable acre (fractional results shall be rounded up to the next whole number) to qualify for a density bonus. In addition, in order to qualify for a bonus, developments shall also incorporate at least 1 of the features described below: (i) Active common recreation amenities such as sports courts, recreation center, pool, spa/jacuzzi. (ii) Surface parking lots containing not more than 6 parking stalls separated from other parking areas by landscaping with a minimum width of 15 feet. (i) Affordable housing units, either for sale or rental, or (ii) Units built to Built Green 3 Star (at minimum) building standards. Higher Built Green standards are allowed and may receive a greater density bonus upon review and approval of the Planning Director. Combinations of the above are allowed, provided that at least 1 unit of affordable housing (per net acre) is provided. For example, 2 units of affordable housing and 2 units built to Built Green 3 Star standards would achieve a density bonus of 4 units. and Design; • Parking, Access, and Circulation; • Landscaping/Recr eation/Common Space; and • Building Architectural Design applying to Area "A" of the Urban Design District located in RMC 4-3-100 shall be permitted a maximum density of 100 dwelling units per net acre. with incomes at or below 50% of the area median income, or (ii) Open Space: Provide increased common outdoor open space areas or recreational facilities beyond standard code requirements. The open space shall abut the shoreline, where applicable. The open space shall provide a quality environment through either passive or active recreation facilities, and attractive common areas, including accessibility from buildings by public walkways. In addition, in order to qualify for a bonus, developments shall also incorporate the features described below: (iii) Overall Design: Provide a development design ATTACHMENT A- Page 3 of 5 8 d .   ‐   D e n s i t y   B o n u s e s   i n   M u l t i ‐ F a m i l y   Z o n e   C o d e   A m e n d m e n t   ‐   T i t l e   I V   D o c k e t   # D ‐ 4 0   ( 1 s t   r e a d i n g   1 1 / 8 / 2 0 1 0 ) P a g e 1 5 1 o f 1 9 5 ORDINANCE NO. Bonus Criteria (continued): that is superior to the design that would result from development of the subject property under standard code requirements, including but not limited to superior architectural design, placement, relationship or orientation of structures and/or enhanced ground plane textures or colors, and (iv) Ground floor commercial shall be provided at appropriate levels given the overall project design, and (v) Environmental Enhancements: (a) Significant environmental enhancement and/or restoration is provided that protects critical areas and/or shorelines, that would not be ATTACHMENT A - Page 4 of 5 8 d .   ‐   D e n s i t y   B o n u s e s   i n   M u l t i ‐ F a m i l y   Z o n e   C o d e   A m e n d m e n t   ‐   T i t l e   I V   D o c k e t   # D ‐ 4 0   ( 1 s t   r e a d i n g   1 1 / 8 / 2 0 1 0 ) P a g e 1 5 2 o f 1 9 5 ORDINANCE NO. protected to the same degree otherwise, or (b) Design which results in a sustainable development; such as LEED certification, energy efficiency, use of alternative energy resources, low impact development techniques, etc. ATTACHMENT A-Page 5 of 5 8 d .   ‐   D e n s i t y   B o n u s e s   i n   M u l t i ‐ F a m i l y   Z o n e   C o d e   A m e n d m e n t   ‐   T i t l e   I V   D o c k e t   # D ‐ 4 0   ( 1 s t   r e a d i n g   1 1 / 8 / 2 0 1 0 ) P a g e 1 5 3 o f 1 9 5 & AaAjJj^ /I't-AOlO Ist AMJ^H CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON ORDINANCE NO. AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON, AMENDING SUBSECTIONS 4-2-130A, DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS FOR INDUSTRIAL ZONING DESIGNATIONS, AND 4-2-130B, CONDITIONS ASSOCIATED WITH DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS TABLE FOR INDUSTRIAL ZONING DESIGNATIONS, OF CHAPTER 2, ZONING DISTRICTS - USES AND STANDARDS, OF TITLE IV (DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS) OF ORDINANCE NO. 4260 ENTITLED "CODE OF GENERAL ORDINANCES OF THE CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON", TO AMEND LIGHT INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS INCLUDING HEIGHT, REAR AND SIDE SETBACKS, AND LOT COVERAGE. I .„m '' *r T I WHEREAS, many of the permitted uses in the Industrial Light (IL) zone and the Commercial Office (CO) zone are the same; and WHEREAS, allowing Industrial Light (IL) zoned properties similar development regulations as Commercial Office (CO) zone properties for setbacks, height, and lot coverage would result in consistent development patterns in designated employment areas of the City; and WHEREAS, this matter was duly referred to the Planning Commission for investigation, study, and the matter having been duly considered by the Planning Commission, and the zoning text amendment request being in conformity with the City's Comprehensive Plan, as amended; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission held a public hearing on July 7, 2010, having duly considered all matters relevant thereto, and all parties having been heard appearing in support or opposition; NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON, DOES ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS: 8e. ‐ Office in the Industrial Light (IL) Zone Code Amendment ‐ Title IV  Docket #D‐41 (1st reading 11/8/2010)Page 154 of 195 ORDINANCE NO. SECTION I: Subsection 4-2-130A, Development Standards for Industrial Zoning Designations, of Chapter 2, Zoning Districts - Uses and Standards, of Title IV (Development Regulations) of Ordinance No. 4260 entitled "Code of General Ordinances of the City of Renton, Washington", is hereby amended so the Lot Coverage and Height sections and the Setbacks section only for the Minimum Rear and Side Yards row, are hereby amended as follows: 4-2-130A DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS FOR INDUSTRIAL ZONING DESIGNATIONS IL IM IH LOT COVERAGE Maximum Lot Coverage for Buildings 65% of total lot area or 75% if parking is provided within the building or within a parking garage None None HEIGHT Maximum Building Height, except for Public uses having a "Public Suffix" (P) designation Maximum Height for Wireless Communication Facilities 50 ft., except 100 ft. if lot is located in the Employment Area Valley (EAV)4'5'13 SeeRMC4-4-140G. None See RMC 4-4-140G. None See RMC 4-4- 140G. SETBACKS8'11 Minimum Rear and Side Yards11 None, except 20 ft. if lot abuts or is adjacent to a residential zone, R-l, R-4, R-8, RMH, R-10, R-14, or RMT ; which may be reduced to 15 ft. through the site plan development review process. None, except 50 ft. if lot abuts or is adjacent to a residential zone, R- 1, R-4, R-8, RMH, R- 10, R-14, or RM. None, except, 50 ft. if lot abuts a lot zoned R-l, R- 4, R-8, R-10, R-14, or RM-I. 20 ft. if lot abuts a lot zoned CN, CV, CA, CD, CO, COR, or P- Suffix. 8e. ‐ Office in the Industrial Light (IL) Zone Code Amendment ‐ Title IV  Docket #D‐41 (1st reading 11/8/2010)Page 155 of 195 ORDINANCE NO. SECTION II: Subsection 4-2-130B.4, of subsection 4-2-130B, Conditions Associated with Development Standards Table for Industrial Zoning Designations, of Chapter 2, Zoning Districts - Uses and Standards, of Title IV (Development Regulations) of Ordinance No. 4260 entitled "Code of General Ordinances of the City of Renton, Washington", is hereby amended as follows: 4. To construct a building or structure in excess of 50', outside the EAV, requires an Administrative Conditional Use Permit. SECTION III: This ordinance shall be effective upon its passage, approval, and five (5) days after publication. PASSED BY THE CITY COUNCIL this day of _, 2010. Bonnie I. Walton, City Clerk APPROVED BY THE MAYOR this day of _ _, 2010. Approved as to form: Lawrence J. Warren, City Attorney Date of Publication: Denis Law, Mayor ORD:1654:8/6/10:scr 8e. ‐ Office in the Industrial Light (IL) Zone Code Amendment ‐ Title IV  Docket #D‐41 (1st reading 11/8/2010)Page 156 of 195 /s//waJ^f j/-r>Ao/o CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON ORDINANCE NO. AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON, AMENDING SECTION 4-2-110, RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS, OF CHAPTER 2, ZONING DISTRICTS - USES AND STANDARDS, OF TITLE IV (DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS) OF ORDINANCE NO. 4260 ENTITLED "CODE OF GENERAL ORDINANCES OF THE CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON", TO AMEND DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS FOR EXISTING RESIDENTIAL MANUFACTURED HOME PARKS. WHEREAS, all existing manufactured home parks and mobile home parks within the City limits were created prior to 1996; and WHEREAS, the development standards used when creating the existing manufactured and mobile home parks are different then the existing development standards; and WHEREAS, supporting the continued use of the existing manufactured and mobile home parks would support Goal 2 of the Housing Element of the Comprehensive Plan, which states "Ensure that housing exists for all economic segments of Renton's population"; and WHEREAS, the City seeks to amend the development standards to allow the continuation of existing manufactured and mobile home parks as originally approved; and WHEREAS, this matter was duly referred to the Planning Commission for investigation, study, and the matter having been duly considered by the Planning Commission, and the zoning text amendment request being in conformity with the City's Comprehensive Plan, as amended; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission held a public hearing on July 7, 2010, having duly considered all matters relevant thereto, and all parties having been heard appearing in support or opposition; 8f. ‐ Mobile Homes Setbacks Code Amendment ‐ Title IV Docket #D‐42  (1st reading 11/8/2010)Page 157 of 195 ORDINANCE NO. NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON, DOES ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS: SECTION I. Subsection 4-2-110C, Development Standards for Residential Manufactured Home Park Zoning Designation, of Chapter 2, Zoning Districts - Uses and Standards, of Title IV (Development Regulations) of Ordinance No. 4260 entitled "Code of General Ordinances of the City of Renton, Washington", is hereby amended so the row labeled "Setbacks for Mobile Home Parks Constructed Before 12-3-1969 (Highlands)" is amended as follows: DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS FOR RESIDENTIAL MANUFACTURED HOME PARK ZONING DESIGNATION NEW PARK Development or Redevelopment INDIVIDUAL MANUFACTURED HOME SPACES Primary and Attached Accessory Structures DETACHED ACCESSORY STRUCTURES5 Setbacks for Mobile Home Parks Constructed Before 42- 3-1969 NA (Highlands) 8-1-2010 Yard abutting a public street: 20 ft. Any yard abutting an exterior property boundary of the mobile home park: 5 ft. Minimum distance between mobile homes: 15 ft. Minimum distance between canopy and mobile home on an abutting lot: 5 ft. Setbacks from all other "lot lines": 0 ft. (see RMC 4-2-110E) Yard abutting a public street: 20 ft. Any yard abutting an exterior property boundary of the mobile home park: 5 ft. Minimum distance between structure and mobile home on an abutting lot: 5 ft. Setbacks from all other "lot lines": 0 ft. 8f. ‐ Mobile Homes Setbacks Code Amendment ‐ Title IV Docket #D‐42  (1st reading 11/8/2010)Page 158 of 195 ORDINANCE NO. SECTION II. Subsection 4-2-110E, Illustrations, of Chapter 2, Zoning Districts - Uses and Standards, of Title IV (Development Regulations) of Ordinance No. 4260 entitled "Code of General Ordinances of the City of Renton, Washington", is hereby amended to add an illustration entitled "Setbacks for Mobile Home Parks Constructed Before 8-1-10", as shown on Attachment A. SECTION III. This ordinance shall be effective upon its passage, approval, and five (5) days after publication. PASSED BY THE CITY COUNCIL this day of. _, 2010. Bonnie I. Walton, City Clerk APPROVED BY THE MAYOR this day of _ _, 2010. Approved as to form: Lawrence J. Warren, City Attorney Denis Law, Mayor Date of Publication: ORD:1658:8/ll/10:scr 8f. ‐ Mobile Homes Setbacks Code Amendment ‐ Title IV Docket #D‐42  (1st reading 11/8/2010)Page 159 of 195 ORDINANCE NO. SETBACKS FOR MOBILE HOME PARKS CONSTRUCTED BEFORE 8-1-2010 STREET nmimiMHKH»iimiiiimimttiiii»MHsioCTAL^ • ***** * * <4 *«** *.*••• >jr«* *-4 * * MOBILE HOHE CAHOPV ATTACHMENT A - PAGE 1 OF 1 8f. ‐ Mobile Homes Setbacks Code Amendment ‐ Title IV Docket #D‐42  (1st reading 11/8/2010)Page 160 of 195 lstAM^^f /J^T-ZdfO CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON ORDINANCE NO. AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON, AMENDING SECTIONS 4-11-020, DEFINITIONS B, AND 4-11-070, DEFINITIONS G, OF CHAPTER 11, DEFINITIONS, OF TITLE IV (DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS) OF ORDINANCE NO. 4260 ENTITLED "CODE OF GENERAL ORDINANCES OF THE CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON", TO AMEND THE REGULATIONS REGARDING BULK STANDARDS BY REVISING THE FIGURE THAT ILLUSTRATES THE DEFINITION OF BUILDING HEIGHT AND REVISING THE DEFINITION OF "GRADE PLANE". WHEREAS, the City recognizes that measuring building height from existing grade rather than finished grade would minimize potential impacts on neighboring properties, such as view structure height and view blockage; and WHEREAS, the City recognizes that measuring building height from existing grade rather than finished grade would result in compatibility of site grades between neighboring properties, and lessen drainage impacts; and WHEREAS, the City seeks to set standards that are consistent with adopted building codes; and WHEREAS, the City seeks to measure the height of structures based on the building facade, and not appurtenances such as elevator shafts, enclosed stairwells and mechanical equipment; and WHEREAS, this matter was duly referred to the Planning Commission for investigation, study, and the matter having been duly considered by the Planning Commission, and the zoning text amendment request being in conformity with the City's Comprehensive Plan, as amended; and 8g. ‐ Definition of Building Height & Grade Plane Code Amendments ‐  Title IV Docket #D‐43 (1st reading 11/8/2010)Page 161 of 195 ORDINANCE NO. WHEREAS, the Planning Commission held a public hearing on July 7, 2010, having duly considered all matters relevant thereto, and all parties having been heard appearing in support or opposition; NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON, DOES ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS: SECTION I. Section 4-11-020, Definitions B, of Chapter 11, Definitions, of Title IV (Development Regulations) of Ordinance No. 4260 entitled "Code of General Ordinances of the City of Renton, Washington", is hereby amended to replace the existing figure to illustrate the definition of "Building Height" as shown below. The definition language shall remain as currently codified. Height Limits on Sloped Sites Added Height = Percent of slope Z divided by 6 (to a maximum of S feet: 8g. ‐ Definition of Building Height & Grade Plane Code Amendments ‐  Title IV Docket #D‐43 (1st reading 11/8/2010)Page 162 of 195 ORDINANCE NO. BUILDING HEIGHT - TOP OF ROOF MID POINT OF ROOF TOP OF WALL PLATE GRADE PLANE 493.25 EXISTING GRADE ELEVATIDN DETERMINATION DF BUILDING HEIGHT SECTION II. Section 4-11-070, Definitions G, of Chapter 11, Definitions, of Title IV (Development Regulations) of Ordinance No. 4260 entitled "Code of General Ordinances of the City of Renton, Washington", is hereby amended so the definition of Grade Plane is amended as follows: GRADE PLANE: A reference plane representing the average of finished existing ground level adjoining the building at exterior walls. Where the finished ground level slopes away from exterior wall, the reference plane shall be established by the lowest points within the area between the building and the lot line, or , where the lot line is more than six feet (6') from the building, between the building and a point six feet (6') from the building. 8g. ‐ Definition of Building Height & Grade Plane Code Amendments ‐  Title IV Docket #D‐43 (1st reading 11/8/2010)Page 163 of 195 N ( ELEVATION +99'—v ELEVATION +97'— ELEVATION +92' — ELEVATION +90' — }RD V 1 k 1 1 NA d\ICE NO. STREET -> •o 1 "to -°".-. BUILDING "o 1 "eO - \ - -m .jt<d /—ELEVATION +97' — ELEVATION +96' —ELEVATION +90' "—ELEVATION +88' DETERMINE AVERAGE GRADE ELEVATIDN AT EACH EXTERIDR WALU NDRTHi <497+49G>/2=496,50 VEST* <497+492)/2=494,50 SOUTH: (490+488)72=489,00 EAST: <490+496)/2=493,00 1973,00/4=493,25' (LQV POINT WITHIN 6 FEET) GRADE PLANE DETERMINATION DF GRADE PLANE ELEVATIDN SECTION III. This ordinance shall be effective upon its passage, approval, and five (5) days after publication. PASSED BY THE CITY COUNCIL this day of _ , 2010. APPROVED BY THE MAYOR this day of. Bonnie I. Walton, City Clerk , 2010. Denis Law, Mayor 8g. ‐ Definition of Building Height & Grade Plane Code Amendments ‐  Title IV Docket #D‐43 (1st reading 11/8/2010)Page 164 of 195 ORDINANCE NO. Approved as to form: Lawrence J. Warren, City Attorney Date of Publication: ORD:1676:10/5/10:scr 8g. ‐ Definition of Building Height & Grade Plane Code Amendments ‐  Title IV Docket #D‐43 (1st reading 11/8/2010)Page 165 of 195 stA,*Afj*ij* fi-f-M/O AM^M^UZ CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON ORDINANCE NO. AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON, AMENDING SUBSECTIONS 4-2-060G, OTHER COMMUNITY AND PUBLIC FACILITIES, AND 4-2- 080A, SUBJECT TO THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS, OF CHAPTER 2, ZONING DISTRICTS - USES AND STANDARDS, SECTION 4-8-120, SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS - SPECIFIC TO APPLICATION TYPE, OF CHAPTER 8, PERMITS - GENERAL AND APPEALS, SUBSECTION 4-9-0301, ADDITIONAL DECISION CRITERIA FOR SECURE COMMUNITY TRANSITION FACILITIES, OF CHAPTER 9, PERMITS - SPECIFIC, AND SECTION 4-11-040, DEFINITIONS D, OF CHAPTER 11, DEFINITIONS, OF TITLE IV (DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS) OF ORDINANCE NO. 4260 ENTITLED "CODE OF GENERAL ORDINANCES OF THE CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON", TO ADD REGULATIONS RELATING TO CRISIS DIVERSION AND CRISIS DIVERSION INTERIM SERVICE FACILITIES. T> j c WHEREAS, Crisis Diversion and Crisis Diversion Interim Service Facilities are part of the King County Crisis Diversion program outlined in the Mental Illness Drug Dependency Action Plan; and WHEREAS, the purpose of the regional facilities is to divert individuals from the criminal justice system by providing access to needed assessment, stabilization, services, and treatment; and WHEREAS, the County established locational criteria limiting the facilities' location to South King County and within close proximity of highways, major arterials and Metro bus routes; and WHEREAS, the County proposed diversion facilities were not anticipated by the City's zoning code; and WHEREAS, this matter was duly referred to the Planning Commission for investigation, study, and the matter having been duly considered by the Planning Commission, and the zoning 8h. ‐ Crisis Diversion Interim Service Facilities Code Amendment ‐ Title  IV Docket #D‐45 (1st reading 11/8/2010)Page 166 of 195 ORDINANCE NO. text amendment request being in conformity with the City's Comprehensive Plan, as amended; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission held a public hearing on July 7, 2010, having considered all matters relevant thereto, and all parties having been heard appearing in support or opposition; NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON, DOES ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS: SECTION I. Subsection 4-2-060G, Other Community and Public Facilities, of Chapter 2, Zoning Districts - Uses and Standards, of Title IV (Development Regulations) of Ordinance No. 4260 entitled "Code of General Ordinances of the City of Renton, Washington", is hereby amended as shown on Attachment A. SECTION II. Subsection 4-2-080A, Subject to the Following Conditions, of Chapter 2, Zoning Districts - Uses and Standards, of Title IV (Development Regulations) of Ordinance No. 4260 entitled "Code of General Ordinances of the City of Renton, Washington", is hereby amended to add a new subsection 4-2-080A.116, to read as follows: 116. Crisis Diversion (CDF) and Crisis Diversion Interim Service Facilities (CDIS) shall only be located within the Employment Area Valley (EAV) land use designation, south of 1-405, subject to Hearing Examiner Conditional Use Permit- See EAV Map in RMC 4-2-080B. No CDF or CDIS shall be allowed adjacent to, abutting, across a parking lot from, or within the "line of sight" from a risk potential activity. For the purposes of granting a Conditional Use Permit for siting a CDF or CDIS, the Reviewing Official shall consider a permanent, unobstructed 8h. ‐ Crisis Diversion Interim Service Facilities Code Amendment ‐ Title  IV Docket #D‐45 (1st reading 11/8/2010)Page 167 of 195 ORDINANCE NO. visual distance of six hundred feet (600') to be within "line of sight". The Reviewing Official may reduce the distance to less than six hundred feet (600') through the Conditional Use Permit process, if the applicant can demonstrate that a visual barrier exists or can be created that would reduce the line of sight to less than six hundred feet (600'). Risk potential facilities currently include, but are not limited to: Community and recreation centers, Churches, synagogues, temples and mosques. Licensed daycare. Licensed preschool facilities, Public libraries, Public parks, Public and private schools. School bus stops, • Sports fields, or • Publicly dedicated trails. SECTION III. Subsection 4-8-120C, Table C - Land Use Permit Submittal Requirements, of Chapter 8, Permits - General and Appeals, of Title IV (Development Regulations) of Ordinance No. 4260 entitled "Code of General Ordinances of the City of Renton, Washington", is hereby amended so the box labeled "Siting Process Report for Use Permits for SCTF" is amended as shown below. All other portions of the table remain as currently codified. Siting Process Report for Use Permits for SCTF, CDF or CDIS Facilities 8h. ‐ Crisis Diversion Interim Service Facilities Code Amendment ‐ Title  IV Docket #D‐45 (1st reading 11/8/2010)Page 168 of 195 ORDINANCE NO. SECTION IV. Subsection 4-8-120D.19, Definitions S, of Chapter 8, Permits - General and Appeals, of Title IV (Development Regulations) of Ordinance No. 4260 entitled "Code of General Ordinances of the City of Renton, Washington", is hereby amended so the definition of "Siting Process Report for Use Permits for Secure Community Treatment Facility", is amended to change the title to "Siting Process Report for Use Permits for Secure Community Treatment Facilities (SCTF), Crisis Diversion Facilities (CDF) or Crisis Diversion Interim Service Facilities (CDIS)", and as follows: Siting Process Report for Use Permits for Secure Community Treatment Facilities (SCTF), Crisis Diversion Facilities (CDF) or Crisis Diversion Interim Service Facilities (CDIS): A narrative report describing the process used to evaluate alternative sites for the proposed SCTF, CDF or CDIS activity and the basis for the recommendation to locate the facility at the recommended site. A minimum of three alternative sites shall be addressed. SECTION V. Subsection 4-9-0301, Additional Decision Criteria for Secure Community Transition Facilities, of Chapter 9, Permits - Specific, of Title IV (Development Regulations) of Ordinance No. 4260 entitled "Code of General Ordinances of the City of Renton, Washington", is hereby amended to change the title to "Additional Decision Criteria for Secure Community Transition Facilities (SCTF), Crisis Diversion Facilities (CDF) and Crisis Diversion Interim Service Facilities", and as follows: I. ADDITIONAL DECISION CRITERIA FOR SECURE COMMUNITY TRANSITION FACILITIES (SCTF). CRISIS DIVERSION FACILITIES (CDF) AND CRISIS DIVERSION INTERIM SERVICE FACILITIES (CDIS): 8h. ‐ Crisis Diversion Interim Service Facilities Code Amendment ‐ Title  IV Docket #D‐45 (1st reading 11/8/2010)Page 169 of 195 ORDINANCE NO. The reviewing official shall consider the following additional criteria in determining whether to issue a conditional use permit for secure community transition, crisis diversion, or crisis diversion interim service facilities. 1. Alternative locations were reviewed and consideration given to sites that are farthest removed from any risk potential activity. PC recommonds amending to address DSHS comments that the original language creates a more restrictive standard. 2. There is no resulting concentration of residential facility beds operated by tho Dopartmont of Corrections or tho Mental Health Division of tho Dopartmont of Social and Health Services, tho number of registered sex offenders classified as Level II or Level III and tho number of sex offenders rogisterod as homeless in a particular neighborhood, community, jurisdiction or region. 3T-2. Adequate buffering is provided from abutting and adjacent uses. 4r 3. Adequate security is demonstrated by the applicant. ST 4. Public input is provided during the siting process. 5. For SCTF there is no resulting concentration of residential facility beds operated by the Department of Corrections or the Mental Health Division of the Department of Social and Health Services, the number of registered sex offenders classified as Level II or Level III, and the number of sex offenders registered as homeless in a particular neighborhood, community, jurisdiction or region. 8h. ‐ Crisis Diversion Interim Service Facilities Code Amendment ‐ Title  IV Docket #D‐45 (1st reading 11/8/2010)Page 170 of 195 ORDINANCE NO. SECTION VI: Section 4-11-040, Definitions D, of Chapter 11, Definitions, of Title IV (Development Regulations) of Ordinance No. 4260 entitled "Code of General Ordinances of the City of Renton, Washington", is hereby amended to add definitions for "Diversion Facility" and "Diversion Interim Service Facility" in alphabetical order, to read as follows: DIVERSION FACILITY: A facility which provides community crisis services, whereby individuals are diverted from jails, hospitals or other treatment options due to mental illness or chemical dependency. DIVERSION INTERIM SERVICE FACILITY: A facility which provides interim or respite services, such as temporary shelter, medical/mental health treatment, case management or other support options such as transportation arrangements for patients referred to such a facility from a diversion facility. SECTION VII: This ordinance shall be effective upon its passage, approval, and five (5) days after publication. PASSED BY THE CITY COUNCIL this day of , 2010. Bonnie I. Walton, City Clerk APPROVED BY THE MAYOR this day of , 2010. Denis Law, Mayor 8h. ‐ Crisis Diversion Interim Service Facilities Code Amendment ‐ Title  IV Docket #D‐45 (1st reading 11/8/2010)Page 171 of 195 ORDINANCE NO. Approved as to form: Lawrence J. Warren, City Attorney Date of Publication: ORD:1652:8/4/10:scr 8h. ‐ Crisis Diversion Interim Service Facilities Code Amendment ‐ Title  IV Docket #D‐45 (1st reading 11/8/2010)Page 172 of 195 ORDINANCE NO. 4-2-060 ZONING USE TABLE - USES ALLOWED IN ZONING DESIGNATIONS: ZONING USE TABLE USES: RESIDENTIAL ZONING DESIGNATIONS RC R- 1 R-4 R-8 RMH R- 10 R- 14 RM INDUSTRIAL IL IM IH COMMERCIAL ZONING DESIGNATIONS CN CV CA CD CO COR UC- Nl UC- N2 G. OTHER COMMUNITY AND PUBLIC FACILITIES Community Facilities Cemetery Religious institutions Service and social organizations H H H H H H H H H H H H H H H H H H H H H H H H H H H H H H H H H H H H H H H H H H H H H12 H H H21 H H78 H90 H90 Public Facilities City government offices City government facilities Jails, existing municipal Diversion Facilitv & Diversion Interim Service Facilitv Secure community transition facilities Other government offices and facilities H H AD H H AD H H AD H H AD H H AD H H AD H H AD H H AD H H AD H H116 H71 H AD H H116 H71 H AD H H AD H H AD H H AD H P H P H H AD H H AD H H AD90 H90 H90 ATTACHMENTA-PAGE10F1 8 h .   ‐   C r i s i s   D i v e r s i o n   I n t e r i m   S e r v i c e   F a c i l i t i e s   C o d e   A m e n d m e n t   ‐   T i t l e   I V   D o c k e t   # D ‐ 4 5   ( 1 s t   r e a d i n g   1 1 / 8 / 2 0 1 0 ) P a g e 1 7 3 o f 1 9 5 I rA£aJi^f U^AOfO CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON ORDINANCE NO. AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON, AMENDING SECTION 4-2-060, ZONING USE TABLE - USES ALLOWED IN ZONING DESIGNATIONS, OF CHAPTER 2, ZONING DISTRICTS - USES AND STANDARDS, SUBSECTION 4-3- 100E.2, DEDICATION OF OPEN SPACE, OF CHAPTER 3, ENVIRONMENTAL REGULATIONS AND OVERLAY DISTRICTS, SECTIONS 4-4-010, STANDARDS FOR ANIMAL KEEPING ACCESSORY TO RESIDENTIAL/COMMERCIAL USES, AND 4-4- 100, SIGN REGULATIONS, OF CHAPTER 4, CITY-WIDE PROPERTY DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS, SUBSECTION 4-8-120C, TABLE 4-8-120C - LAND USE PERMIT SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS, OF CHAPTER 8, PERMITS - GENERAL AND APPEALS, SUBSECTION 4-9-100A, PURPOSE, OF CHAPTER 9, PERMITS - SPECIFIC, AND SECTION 4-11-190, DEFINITIONS S, OF CHAPTER 11, DEFINITIONS, OF TITLE IV (DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS) OF ORDINANCE NO. 4260 ENTITLED "CODE OF GENERAL ORDINANCES OF THE CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON", TO AMEND CERTAIN REGULATIONS PURSUANT TO THE JUNE 2009 DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY AND ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT'S ADMINISTRATIVE POLICY/CODE INTERPRETATION. THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON, DOES ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS: SECTION I. Subsection 4-2-0601, Retail, of Chapter 2, Zoning Districts - Uses and Standards, of Title IV (Development Regulations) of Ordinance No. 4260 entitled "Code of General Ordinances of the City of Renton, Washington", is hereby amended so the row for Retail Sales is amended as follows: ZONING USE TABLE USES: 1. RETAIL Retail Sales RESIDENTIAL ZONING DESIGNATIONS RC R-l R-4 R-8 RMH R- 10 R-14 AD33 RM AD INDUSTRIAL IL P34 IM P34 IH P34 COMMERCIAL ZONING DESIGNATIONS CN P60 cv p CA P§8 CD P CO P54 COR P21 UC- Nl P82 uc- N2 P95 SECTION II. Subsection 4-2-060O, Utilities, of Chapter 2, Zoning Districts - Uses and Standards, of Title IV (Development Regulations) of Ordinance No. 4260 entitled "Code of 8i. ‐ Administrative Policy/Code Interpretation Code Amendment ‐ Title  IV Docket #D‐46 (1st reading 11/8/2010)Page 174 of 195 ORDINANCE NO. General Ordinances of the City of Renton, Washington", is hereby amended to add a new row entitled "Ham Radio Antenna", to read as follows: ZONING USE TABLE USES: 0. UTILITIES Ham Radio Antenna RESIDENTIAL ZONING DESIGNATIONS RC AD R-l R-4 R-8 RMH R- 10 R- 14 RM AD AD'AD AD AD AD AD INDUSTRIAL IL IM IH COMMERCIAL ZONING DESIGNATIONS CN CV CA CD CO COR '• AD AD AD AD, AD UC- Nl AD UC- N2 AD SECTION III: Subsection 4-3-110E.2.a, of subsection 4-3-110E.2, Dedication of Open Space, of Chapter 3, Environmental Regulations and Overlay Districts, of Title IV (Development Regulations) of Ordinance No. 4260 entitled "Code of General Ordinances of the City of Renton, Washington", is hereby amended as follows: a. Approval of a plat, and/or building permit on an undeveloped legal lot: i. w-Mav Valley Urban Separator Overlay: Approval of a plat, and/or building permit on an undeveloped legal lot in the May Valley the Urban Separator Overlay shall require dedication of fifty percent (50%) of the gross land area of the parcel or parcels as a non-revocable open space tract retained by property owner, or dedicated to a homeowners association or other suitable organization as determined by the reviewing official. ii. Talbot Urban Separator Overlay: Approval of a plat, and/or building permit on an undeveloped legal lot in the Talbot Urban Separator Overlay shall require dedication of fifty percent (50%) of the gross land area of that portion of the parcel or parcels located within the Urban Separator as a 8i. ‐ Administrative Policy/Code Interpretation Code Amendment ‐ Title  IV Docket #D‐46 (1st reading 11/8/2010)Page 175 of 195 ORDINANCE NO. non-revocable open space tract retained by the property owner, or dedicated to a homeowners association or other suitable organization as determined by the reviewing official. In order to satisfy the dedication requirement, some of the area to be dedicated may consist of land abutting the Urban Separator, as determined by the Planning Director, on a case-by-case basis. Acreage in tracts may include critical areas and/or critical area buffers. At a minimum, open space shall be connected to another contiguous open space parcel by a fifty foot (50') corridor. SECTION IV: Section 4-4-010, Standards for Animal Keeping Accessory to Residential/Commercial Uses, of Chapter 4, City-Wide Property Development Standards, of Title IV (Development Regulations) of Ordinance No. 4260 entitled "Code of General Ordinances of the City of Renton, Washington", is hereby amended to change the title to "Animal Keeping Standards", and as follows: 4-4-010 STANDARDS FOR ANIMAL KEEPING STANDARDS ACCESSORY-^TQ RESIDENTIAL/COMMERCIAL USES: A. PURPOSE AND INTENT: Animal owners keep their animals for a variety of reasons including, but not limited to, companionship, affection and protection. The regulations in this sSection set standards intended to require that the keeping of animals occurs in a humane and appropriate manner that benefits the animals and allows animals to coexist harmoniously with adjacent and abutting uses. B. APPLICABILITY: 8i. ‐ Administrative Policy/Code Interpretation Code Amendment ‐ Title  IV Docket #D‐46 (1st reading 11/8/2010)Page 176 of 195 ORDINANCE NO. The keeping of animals shall be consistent with the standards in this Section, RMC 1-3-3, Nuisances and RMC 8-7-3, Public Disturbances - Noises. The keeping of household pets and/or domestic animals up to the maximum number allowed in this Section and/or RMC 4-9-100, Additional Animals Permit, by an owner/tenant for the purpose of enjoyment is permitted outright as an accessory use to residential or commercial use subject to the requirements of this Section, and RMC 4 5 050A, Accessory Use. Household pots and/or domestic animals must not bocomo a nuisanco (RMC 13 3) or create a public disturbance (RMC 8 7 3). The kooping of animals shall bo consistent with tho standards in this chapter. C. EXCEPTION: Occasional breeders are permitted to keep a greater number of animals than allowed on a temporary basis, not to exceed one hundred twenty (120) days, when those animals are less than one hundred twenty (120) days old. No Additional Animals Permit is required, but a Home Occupation Business License is required. P. NUISANCE AND DISTURBANCE PROHIBITED: Household pets and/or domestic animals must not become a nuisance (RMC 1-3-3) or create a public disturbance (RMC 8-7-3). E. PROHIBITED ANIMALS: The keeping of animals that are wild or dangerous is not permitted pursuant to RMC 6-6-12. Additionally, the City prohibits the keeping of roosters or peahens/peacocks. F€. AUTHORITY: 8i. ‐ Administrative Policy/Code Interpretation Code Amendment ‐ Title  IV Docket #D‐46 (1st reading 11/8/2010)Page 177 of 195 ORDINANCE NO. 1. Responsibility: Interpretation regarding responsibility will be determined administratively; responsibility for enforcement of the provisions of this Section shall be as follows: a. Animal Control Officer: All those matters related to care, maintenance, and individual licensing. b. Planning Division: All those matters concerning land use and zoning. GO. NUMBER OF ANIMALS ALLOWED: 1. Lot Size Minimums and Maximum Number of Animals Permitted Outright: The allowable numbers of animals permitted outright, provided the minimum lot size is met, are detailed in the following table. The specified minimum lot sizes are absolute requirements. No variances, waivers, and/or modifications under the Renton Municipal Code may be granted. The keeping of animals that require lesser lot size is allowed to be cumulative, when lot size requirements have been met. For example, on a twelve thousand five hundred (12,500) square foot lot, the keeping of two (2) medium lot domestic animals, six (6) small lot domestic animals, and three (3) household pets is permitted outright. Tvoe of Animal Household Pets includes: dogs, cats, rabbits, caged indoor birds, small rodents, non- venomous reptiles and amphibians weighing less than 10 pounds. Small Lot Domestic Animals includes: chickens, ducks, geese, pigeons, rabbits. Maximum Number of Animals Allowed Outright 3* per dwelling or commercial building regardless of lot size. A pet license is required from the City Finance Department for each cat or dog. 3 on lots that are at least 6,000 gross sq ft in size. On lots that are larger than 6,000 gross sq ft, 1 additional small lot domestic animal may be kept per additional 2,000 gross sq ft. 8i. ‐ Administrative Policy/Code Interpretation Code Amendment ‐ Title  IV Docket #D‐46 (1st reading 11/8/2010)Page 178 of 195 ORDINANCE NO. Medium Lot Domestic Animals includes: sheep, miniature goats that are smaller than 24 inches at the shoulder and/or not more than 150 pounds in weight. Large Lot Domestic Animals includes: horses, ponies, donkeys, cows, goats, llamas, oxen, pigs. 2 on lots that are at least 12,500 gross sq ft in size. On lots that are greater than 12,500 gross sq ft, 1 additional medium lot domestic animal may be kept per additional 7,500 gross sq ft. 2 on lots that are at least 1 gross acre in size. On lots that are larger than one gross acre, 1 additional large lot domestic animal may be kept per additional 43,560 sq ft. *lncludes foster animals- Number of Animals Permitted Outright Household Pete Small Lot Domestic Medium Lot Domestic Large Lot Domestic Number Allowed 3 per 2 por 2 por Minimum Gross Square Feet of Lot Size &rQQQ 12,500 13,560 2. Pormittod with Additional Lot Sizo: The allowable number of additional animals pormittod with additional lot sizo, provided the minimum lot sizo of RMC 44 010D1 has boon mot, aro detailed in tho following table. Tho spocifiod additional lot sizos are absolute roquiromonts; variances, waivers, and/or modifications (RMC 4 9 250) may not be granted. Tho minimum lot sizo required to keep a fourth household pot is twenty seven thousand five hundred (27,500) gross square feet. However, 2. Permit Required for More than Three (3) Dogs and/or Cats: Regardless of additional lot size, the keeping of four (4) or more dogs and/or cats shall always require obtainment of an Additional Animals Permit (RMC 4-9-100) or a Conditional Use Permit for a Kennel (RMC 4-9-030). Number of Animals Permitted with Additional Lot Sizo Household Small Lot Medium Lot Largo Lot 8i. ‐ Administrative Policy/Code Interpretation Code Amendment ‐ Title  IV Docket #D‐46 (1st reading 11/8/2010)Page 179 of 195 ORDINANCE NO. Pot*" Domestic Domestic Domestic Additional Number Allowed 1 per l^per 3^pef ^pef Additional Gross Square Foot of Lot Sizo TrSOO* ZJQQQ TTSOO 20,000 1. Not including cats and/or dogs. 2. Provided tho lot sizo is at least 27,500 gross square foot in size. Hi. KEEPING GREATER NUMBER OF ANIMALS THAN ALLOWED: 1. Permitted with an Additional Animals Permit (RMC 4-9-100): Greater numbers of animals than allowed in RMC 4-4-O1O0G1 may be allowed, provided the minimum lot size of RMC 4-4-010OG1 has been met, as detailed in the following table and subject to an Additional Animals Permit (RMC 4-9-100). 2. Minimum Lot Size Needed to Apply for an Additional Animals Permit: Type of Animal Dogs and Cats Other Household Pets includes: rabbits, caged indoor birds, small rodents, non-venomous reptiles and amphibians weighing less than ten pounds. Small Lot Domestic Animals includes: chickens, ducks, geese, pigeons, rabbits. Medium Lot Domestic Animals includes: sheep, miniature goats that are smaller than 24 inches at the shoulder and/or not more than 150 lbs in weight. Large Lot Domestic Animals includes: horses, ponies, donkeys, cows, goats, llamas, oxen, pigs. Minimum Lot Size Needed to Apply for Additional Animals Permit None 27,500 gross sq ft. 6,000 gross sq ft. 12,500 gross so ft. 43,560 gross sq ft. Number of Animals Permitted with Additional Animals Permit Household Pots Small Lot Domestic Medium Lot Domestic Largo Lot Domestic Additional Number Allowed Subject to Review3' Subject to Review Subject to Review Subject to Review 8i. ‐ Administrative Policy/Code Interpretation Code Amendment ‐ Title  IV Docket #D‐46 (1st reading 11/8/2010)Page 180 of 195 ORDINANCE NO. Additional Gross Square Feet of Lot Size I \f 13 1 TfVt i-> I -\ ii/ cr 11/'13' 1. Kooping four (4) or more dogs and/or cats requires an Additional Animals Permit. 2. Occasional brooders are pormittod to keep a greater number of animals than allowed on a temporary basis, not to exceed one hundred twenty (120) days when those animals are less than one hundred twenty (120) days old. 3. Animal fostor caro providers shall be allowed to keep a greater number of household pots than pormittod in RMC 4 4 010D1 or as permitted in RMC 4 4 010D2, provided thoy obtain an Additional Animals Permit (RMC 4 9 100). IR HOME OCCUPATIONS: The keeping of household pets or domestic animals for tho purposes of sale, boarding, or any for-profit venture in all residential and mixed-use zones must comply with the requirements of RMC 4-9-090, Home Occupations, and requires a Home Occupation Business License Permit, RMC 4 9 090. Any owner/tenant who keeps household pets and/or domestic animals and sells any animal-related product, made from or produced by their household pets and/or domestic animals, shall be required to obtain a Home Occupation Permit, RMC 4-9-090. Keeping animals for commercial purposes that exceed the standards of a home occupation accessory use requires approval pursuant to RMC 4-2-060, Uses Allowed in Zoning Designations. JG. GENERAL STANDARDS FOR KEEPING ANIMALS: The keeping of animals shall be consistent with the following standards: 8i. ‐ Administrative Policy/Code Interpretation Code Amendment ‐ Title  IV Docket #D‐46 (1st reading 11/8/2010)Page 181 of 195 ORDINANCE NO. 1. Shelter Location and Setbacks: Shelters, pens, and permanent/temporary kennel structures shall be located a minimum often feet (10') from any property line and in the rear yard. The Planning Division may grant an exemption from this ten-foot (10') requirement if the owner/tenant can provide sufficient information that a side yard would be a better location. 2. Barn and Stable Location and Setbacks: Private barns and stables shall be located a minimum of fifty feet (50') from any property line. Barns and stables may not be located in attached garages or carports. 32-. Confinement Required: All animals shall be kept and maintained in a manner which confines their movement and activity to the premises of the owner/tenant._ 4 a. Fencing Required: Dog runs, open-run areas, and permanent/temporary kennel structures shall be surrounded by a fence of adequate height (as to preclude escape). RMC Section 4-4-040, Fences and Hedges, lists the City's requirements for residential fences. , locatod a minimum often foot (10') from any property line, and located in tho rear yard. Tho Planning Division may grant an exemption from this ton foot (10') requirement if the owner/tenant can provide sufficient information that a side yard would be a better location- Electric and barbed wire fences may be used, provided the conditions of RMC 4 4 040, Fences and Hedges, aro mot- fa. On lots that are larger than ono gross aero in sizo, dog runs, open run areas, and permanent/temporary kennel structures may bo located closer than 8i. ‐ Administrative Policy/Code Interpretation Code Amendment ‐ Title  IV Docket #D‐46 (1st reading 11/8/2010)Page 182 of 195 ORDINANCE NO. ten foot (10') to a property line if tho dog run, open run area, and/or permanent/temporary kennel structure is no closer than ono hundred foot (100') to any dwelling unit and tho location is approved by the Planning Division. 53. Health and Safety: All animals shall be kept in such a manner so as not to create any objectionable noise, odor, annoyance, or become a public nuisance. Provision shall be made to ensure that animal food stored outdoors will not attract rodents, insects, or other animals. 6-4. Animal Waste and Food Waste: All shelter structures, confinement areas, and/or open-run areas shall be kept clean. Provision shall be made for the removal of animal waste and food waste so that the areas are kept free from infestation of insects, rodents, or disease, as well as to prevent obnoxious or foul odors. Animal waste shall be properly disposed of, and any accumulated animal waste must not be stored within the shelter setback area. Any storage of animal waste must not constitute a nuisance as defined in chapter 1-3 RMC. KR ADDITIONAL STANDARDS FOR KENNELS AND STABLES: Kennels and Stables, when allowed by RMC 4-2-060, Zoning Use Table, must comply with the following standards: 1. Shelter and Structures: Shelter shall be provided for animals in clean structures which shall be kept structurally sound, maintained in good repair, contain the animals, and restrict entrance of other animals. All structures associated with kennels and stables shall be located a minimum of fifty feet (50') from any property line and must be located in the rear yard. On lots that are 10 8i. ‐ Administrative Policy/Code Interpretation Code Amendment ‐ Title  IV Docket #D‐46 (1st reading 11/8/2010)Page 183 of 195 ORDINANCE NO. larger than one gross acre in size, exercising, training, and/or riding areas may be located closer than fifty feet (50') from a property line if the exercising, training, and/or riding areas are no closer than one hundred feet (100') to any dwelling unit and the location is approved, in writing, by the Planning Division. 2. Food and Bedding: Suitable food and bedding shall be provided and stored in facilities adequate to provide protection against infestation or contamination by insects or rodents. Refrigeration shall be provided for the protection of perishable foods. 3. Criteria for Indoor Kennel Facilities: Applicants for kennels must show that indoor facilities have a sufficient heating and cooling system to provide a moderate temperature throughout the year; a sufficient ventilation system to circulate the air; an adequate natural or artificial lighting system to allow inspection and cleaning at any time of the day and that interior wall and ceiling surfaces are constructed of materials which are resistant to the absorption of moisture and odors. 4. Criteria for Outdoor Kennel Facilities: Outdoor facilities will be constructed to provide shelter from the weather and associated elements while providing sufficient space for animal movement and exercise. Adequate drainage must be provided to prevent water buildup and subsequent damage and to facilitate waste removal. Adequate fences or retaining walls must be constructed to contain animals and prevent intrusion by others. 11 8i. ‐ Administrative Policy/Code Interpretation Code Amendment ‐ Title  IV Docket #D‐46 (1st reading 11/8/2010)Page 184 of 195 ORDINANCE NO. Kt. ADDITIONAL STANDARDS FOR BEEKEEPING: Beekeeping is allowed pursuant to RMC 4-2-060, Zoning Use Table, and must comply with the following standards: 1. Minimum Setback: Hives shall be located a minimum of twenty five feet (25') from an interior lot line, with the hive(s) entrance(s) facing away from the nearest property line. Hives shall be located a minimum of one hundred feet (100') from public and/or private rights-of-way or access easements. 2. Maintenance Standards: a. Hives shall be maintained to avoid overpopulation and minimize swarming, for example by requeening regularly, so as not to become a nuisance. b. Hives shall be marked or identified to notify visitors. U. REVIEW CRITERIA FOR ADDITIONAL ANIMALS PERMITS: Special review criteria to be considered by the Reviewing Official for Additional Animals Permits are included in RMC 4-9-100. MK. REVIEW CRITERIA FOR KENNELS AND STABLES: For kennels, commercial equine boarding, riding schools, and stables the conditional use criteria of RMC 4-9-030 shall be applicable. L. PROHIBITED ANIMALS: Animals that aro wild or dangerous are prohibited pursuant to RMC 6 6 12. N. NONCONFORMING ANIMALS: See RMC 4-10-070. OM. VIOLATIONS AND PENALTIES: 12 8i. ‐ Administrative Policy/Code Interpretation Code Amendment ‐ Title  IV Docket #D‐46 (1st reading 11/8/2010)Page 185 of 195 ORDINANCE NO. 1. Compliance with Current Code Regulations: If the keeping of animals does not comply with these regulations and is not classified as a legal nonconforming use, the owner shall have to comply with the Code regulations. 2. Fines: Violation of land use permits granted is subject to fines established in this Code. All other violations of police regulations shall be administered in accordance with Chapter 6-6 RMC, Animals and Fowl at Large. SECTION V: Subsection 4-4-040D.4, Electric Fences, of Chapter 4, City-Wide Property Development Standards, of Title IV (Development Regulations) of Ordinance No. 4260 entitled "Code of General Ordinances of the City of Renton, Washington", is hereby amended to change the title to "Electric and Barbed Wire Fences", and as follows: 4. Electric and Barbed Wire Fences: Electric and/or barbed wire fences may be a-re permitted by special administrative fence permit feview in all residential zones in cases where large domestic animals are being kept provided additional fencing or other barrier acceptable to the Administrator is erected along the property lines. SECTION VI: Subsection 4-4-040G.1, Fences Eligible for Administrative Review Process, of Chapter 4, City-Wide Property Development Standards, of Title IV (Development Regulations) of Ordinance No. 4260 entitled "Code of General Ordinances of the City of Renton, Washington", is hereby amended as follows: 1. Fences Eligible for Administrative Review Process: Persons wishing to have one of the following types offences may submit a letter of justification, site 13 8i. ‐ Administrative Policy/Code Interpretation Code Amendment ‐ Title  IV Docket #D‐46 (1st reading 11/8/2010)Page 186 of 195 ORDINANCE NO. plan and typical elevation together with the permit fee to the Department of Community and Economic Development: a. Fences exceeding forty eight inches (48") within front yard or side yards along a street setback but not within a clear vision area. b. Electric fences. c. Barbed wire fences. SECTION VII: Subsections 4-4-100E.2, Location Limitations, and 4-4-100E.3, Height Limits, of Chapter 4, City-Wide Property Development Standards, of Title IV (Development Regulations) of Ordinance No. 4260 entitled "Code of General Ordinances of the City of Renton, Washington", are hereby amended as follows: 2. Location Limitations: Setbacks for signage shall be as listed in the applicable zone as All signs are further limitod and restricted as to location in tho land use zones as such land use zones are defined and established by chapter 4-2 RMC, as amended, or any other regulation pertaining to or regulating zoning. The zoning regulations may contain further sign restrictions. 3. Height Limits: a. Signs within City Center: See subsection H of this Section. b. Signs within Urban Design Sign Regulation Area: See subsection G of this Section. ck Signs Outside City Center and Outside Urban Design Sign Regulation Areas: The height limitation for freestanding, ground, projecting and combination signs shall be the maximum height of the zone or forty feet (40'), 14 8i. ‐ Administrative Policy/Code Interpretation Code Amendment ‐ Title  IV Docket #D‐46 (1st reading 11/8/2010)Page 187 of 195 ORDINANCE NO. whichever is less. Roof signs may extend twenty feet (20') above the parapet wall. This Section shall not apply to those signs covered by subsection E5e of this Section, Large Retail Uses, or subsection G of this Section, Urban Design Sign Regulation Area, or subsection H of this Section, City Center Sign Regulations, or subsection E5f(ii) of this Section, Motor Vehicle Dealership Over One Acre of Contiguous Ownership or Control Located Within the Automall Area(s). SECTION VIII: Subsection 4-4-100E.4, Signs Permitted in All Residential, Commercial and Industrial Zones, of Chapter 4, City-Wide Property Development Standards, of Title IV (Development Regulations) of Ordinance No. 4260 entitled "Code of General Ordinances of the City of Renton, Washington", is hereby amended so only the first paragraph is amended as shown below. Subsections 4-4-100E.4.a through 4-4-100E.4.d shall remain as currently codified. 4. Signs Permitted in All Residential, Commercial, and Industrial Zones: Except for signage within Shoreline Areas (subsection G of this Section), signage in tho P 1 Zone, and signage with tho City Center (subsection H of this Section), m-ln all residential, commercial and industrial zones the following shall apply: SECTION IX: Subsection 4-4-100E.5, Additional Signs Permitted in Commercial and Industrial Zones, of Chapter 4, City-Wide Property Development Standards, of Title IV (Development Regulations) of Ordinance No. 4260 entitled "Code of General Ordinances of the City of Renton, Washington", is hereby amended so only the first paragraph is amended as shown below. Subsections 4-4-100E.5.a through 4-4-100E.5J shall remain as currently codified. 15 8i. ‐ Administrative Policy/Code Interpretation Code Amendment ‐ Title  IV Docket #D‐46 (1st reading 11/8/2010)Page 188 of 195 ORDINANCE NO. 5. Additional Signs Permitted in Commercial and Industrial Zones: Except in the City Center Sign Regulation Area, subsection H, the following shall apply in all commercial and industrial zones: SECTION X: Subsection 4-4-100G, Special Requirements for the Public Use (P-l) Zone, of Chapter 4, City-Wide Property Development Standards, of Title IV (Development Regulations) of Ordinance No. 4260 entitled "Code of General Ordinances of the City of Renton, Washington", is hereby deleted in its entirety, and replaced with the following language, to be entitled "Signs Within Urban Design Area - Special Requirements": G. SIGNS WITHIN URBAN DESIGN AREA - SPECIAL REQUIREMENTS: 1. Applicability: The regulations of this Section apply in addition to the regulations listed in RMC 4-4-100E.5, "Additional Signs Permitted in Commercial and Industrial Zones", to those areas of the City depicted in subsection 3, "Map of Urban Design Sign Regulation Area". 2. Purpose: To provide a means of identifying and advertising businesses, provide directional assistance, encourage signs that are both clear and of appropriate scale for the project, encourage quality signage that contributes to the character of the Urban Center and the Center Village, and create color and interest. 3. Map of Urban Design Sign Regulation Area: Amended map to be inserted by CED 4. General Requirements: 16 8i. ‐ Administrative Policy/Code Interpretation Code Amendment ‐ Title  IV Docket #D‐46 (1st reading 11/8/2010)Page 189 of 195 ORDINANCE NO. a. Integration: Signage shall be an integral part of the design approach to the building- fa. Coordination: In mixed use and multi-use buildings, signage shall be coordinated with the overall building design. c. Size: Corporate logos and signs shall be sized appropriately for their location. d. Size of Entry Signs: Entry signs shall be limited to the name of the larger development. e. Color, Lighting, and Materials: Alteration of trademarks notwithstanding, corporate signage should not be garish in color nor overly lit, although creative design, strong accent colors, and interesting surface materials and lighting techniques are encouraged. f. Preferred Lighting and Sign Type: Front-lit, ground-mounted monument signs are the preferred type of freestanding sign. g. Other Encouraged Signs: Blade type signs, proportional to the building facade on which they are mounted, are encouraged on pedestrian-oriented streets. 5. Additional prohibited signs: In addition to the signs listed in RMC subection 4-4-100C, the following other sign types are also prohibited within the Urban Design Area: a. Pole signs; b. Roof signs; and 17 8i. ‐ Administrative Policy/Code Interpretation Code Amendment ‐ Title  IV Docket #D‐46 (1st reading 11/8/2010)Page 190 of 195 ORDINANCE NO. c. Back-lit signs with letters or graphics on a plastic sheet (can signs or illuminated cabinet signs). Exceptions: Back-lit logo signs less than ten (10) square feet are permitted as area signs with only the individual letters back-lit, see illustration, subsection 5a of this Section). 6. Maximum Height of Freestanding Signs: Freestanding ground-related monument signs, with the exception of primary entry signs, shall be limited to five feet (5') above finished grade, including support structure. 7. Landscaping Required for Freestanding Signs: Freestanding signs shall include decorative landscaping (ground cover and/or shrubs) to provide seasonal interest in the area surrounding the sign. Alternately, signage may incorporate stone, brick, or other decorative materials as approved by the Director. 8. Illustrations -Acceptable and Unacceptable: Typical "can signs" are not acceptable Internally lit letters or graphics are acceptable J, Plastic or — translucent sheet Sheet metal box J '— Only the individual letters are lit SECTION XI: Subsection 4-8-120C, Table 4-8-120C - Land Use Permit Submittal Requirements, of Chapter 8, Permits - General and Appeals, of Title IV (Development 18 8i. ‐ Administrative Policy/Code Interpretation Code Amendment ‐ Title  IV Docket #D‐46 (1st reading 11/8/2010)Page 191 of 195 ORDINANCE NO. Regulations) of Ordinance No. 4260 entitled "Code of General Ordinances of the City of Renton, Washington", is hereby amended so the submittal requirement labeled "Application fee per RMC 4-1-170" is amended to be labeled "Application fee per the City of Renton Fee Schedule Brochure", to add a "X" to the column labeled "Additional Animals Permit", and to remove the "X" from the column labeled "Annexation (60% Petition)". SECTION XII: Subsection 4-8-120C, Table 4-8-120C - Land Use Permit Submittal Requirements, of Chapter 8, Permits - General and Appeals, of Title IV (Development Regulations) of Ordinance No. 4260 entitled "Code of General Ordinances of the City of Renton, Washington", is hereby amended to delete the "List of Surrounding Property Owners", "Mailing Labels for Property Owners", and "Postage" submittal requirement rows, and add a new submittal requirement row, in alphabetical order, entitled "Additional Animals Application Form" with a number 5 placed in the "Additional Animals Permit" column. SECTION XIII: Subsection 4-9-100A, Purpose, of Chapter 9, Permit - Specific, of Title IV (Development Regulations) of Ordinance No. 4260 entitled "Code of General Ordinances of the City of Renton, Washington", is hereby amended as follows: A. PURPOSE: (Rosorvod) To ensure the keeping of animals occurs in a humane and appropriate manner that benefits the animals and allows animals to coexist harmoniously with adjacent and abutting uses. SECTION XIV: Section 4-11-190, Definitions S, of Chapter 11, Definitions, of Title IV (Development Regulations) of Ordinance No. 4260 entitled "Code of General Ordinances of the City of Renton, Washington", is hereby amended to add a definition, in alphabetical order, for the term "Sign, Primary Entry", to read as follows: 19 8i. ‐ Administrative Policy/Code Interpretation Code Amendment ‐ Title  IV Docket #D‐46 (1st reading 11/8/2010)Page 192 of 195 ORDINANCE NO. SIGN, PRIMARY ENTRY: A type of freestanding sign, other than a pole sign, of ten feet (10') or less in height, in which the sign is in contact with the ground, has a solid base anchor, and is independent of any other structure and serves the function of directing customers to the main entrance of a multi-tenant building or multi-building complex. SECTION XV. This ordinance shall be effective upon its passage, approval, and five (5) days after publication. PASSED BY THE CITY COUNCIL this day of _ ., 2010. Bonnie I. Walton, City Clerk APPROVED BY THE MAYOR this day of _ _, 2010. Approved as to form: Lawrence J. Warren, City Attorney Date of Publication: ORD:1660:9/14/10:scr Denis Law, Mayor 20 8i. ‐ Administrative Policy/Code Interpretation Code Amendment ‐ Title  IV Docket #D‐46 (1st reading 11/8/2010)Page 193 of 195 /5AA^W H~?-M° ' Jv6d<dm^ CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON ORDINANCE NO. AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON, AMENDING SECTION 4-9-020, COMPREHENSIVE PLAN ADOPTION AND AMENDMENT PROCESS, OF CHAPTER 9, PERMITS - SPECIFIC, OF TITLE IV (DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS) OF ORDINANCE NO. 4260 ENTITLED "CODE OF GENERAL ORDINANCES OF THE CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON", TO AMEND THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENTS TIMELINE. THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON, DOES ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS: SECTION I. Subsection 4-9-020C.3, of subsection 4-9-020C, Initiation of Proposed Comprehensive Plan Amendments, of Chapter 9, Permits - Specific, of Title IV (Development Regulations) of Ordinance No. 4260 entitled "Code of General Ordinances of the City of Renton, Washington", is hereby amended as follows: 1. Private parties may initiate a Comprehensive Plan Amendment by submitting an application by Docombor October 15th for consideration the following year. SECTION II. Subsections 4-9-020E.2 and 4-9-020E.3 of subsection 4-9-020E, Review Process, of Chapter 9, Permits - Specific, of Title IV (Development Regulations) of Ordinance No. 4260 entitled "Code of General Ordinances of the City of Renton, Washington", are hereby amended as follows: 2. Applications for Comprehensive Plan amendments by private parties shall be accepted by the Department of Community Development between October August 1st and Docombor October 15th for consideration during the following year. 8j. ‐ Comprehensive Plan Amendments Timeline Code Amendment ‐ Title  IV Docket #D‐48 (1st reading 11/8/2010)Page 194 of 195 ORDINANCE NO. 3. City-initiated applications may be accepted at any time, but shall be initiated by kme March 15th for consideration during the current year's amendment cycle. City-initiated applications accepted after Juno March 15th will be considered during the next amendment cycle. This does not apply to amendments exempt from adoption during the annual cycle by GMA. SECTION III. This ordinance shall be effective upon its passage, approval, and five (5) days after publication. PASSED BY THE CITY COUNCIL this day of , 2010. Approved as to form: Lawrence J. Warren, City Attorney Date of Publication: Bonnie I. Walton, City Clerk APPROVED BY THE MAYOR this day of , 2010. Denis Law, Mayor ORD:1651:8/3/10:scr 8j. ‐ Comprehensive Plan Amendments Timeline Code Amendment ‐ Title  IV Docket #D‐48 (1st reading 11/8/2010)Page 195 of 195