Press Alt + R to read the document text or Alt + P to download or print.

No preview available

The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutCouncil 06/14/2010AGENDA RENTON CITY COUNCIL REGULAR MEETING June 14, 2010 Monday, 7 p.m. 1.CALL TO ORDER AND PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE 2.ROLL CALL 3.ADMINISTRATIVE REPORT 4.AUDIENCE COMMENT (Speakers must sign up prior to the Council meeting. Each speaker is allowed five minutes. The comment period will be limited to one‐half hour. The second audience comment period later on in the agenda is unlimited in duration.) When you are recognized by the Presiding Officer, please walk to the podium and state your name and city of residence for the record, SPELLING YOUR LAST NAME. 5.CONSENT AGENDA The following items are distributed to Councilmembers in advance for study and review, and the recommended actions will be accepted in a single motion. Any item may be removed for further discussion if requested by a Councilmember. a. Approval of Council meeting minutes of 6/7/2010. Council concur. b. City Clerk reports bid opening on 6/8/2010 for CAG‐10‐044, Street Patch and Overlay with Curb Ramps project; five bids; engineer's estimate $968,688.05; and submits staff recommendation to award the contract to the low bidder, Lakeside Industries, Inc., in the amount of $809,772.11. Council concur. c. Community and Economic Development Department recommends approval of a contract in the amount of $630,000 with CH2M Hill for consultant services for the Sunset Area Investment Strategy, and approval to allocate $60,000 from the reserves of the Highlands Revitilization Fund for this agreement. Refer to Finance Committee. d. Transportation Systems Division submits the annual update of the Six‐Year Transportation Improvement Program (TIP) and Arterial Street Plan. Refer to Transportation (Aviation) Committee; set public hearing on 6/28/2010. 6.UNFINISHED BUSINESS Topics listed below were discussed in Council committees during the past week. Those topics marked with an asterisk (*) may include legislation. Committee reports on any topics may be held by the Chair if further review is necessary. a. Finance Committee: Interlocal Agreement with WA General Administration*; Geographical Information Services (GIS) Position; Lease with Renton Community Foundation b. Utilities Committee: West Hill Reservoir Recoat & Upgrade 2010 Project 7.RESOLUTIONS AND ORDINANCES Page 1 of 179 Resolution: a. Interlocal agreement with WA General Administration (See 6.a.) Ordinance for second and final reading: a. Hydrant Meter Fees (1st reading 6/7/2010) 8.NEW BUSINESS (Includes Council Committee agenda topics; call 425‐430‐6512 for recorded information.) 9.AUDIENCE COMMENT 10.ADJOURNMENT COMMITTEE OF THE WHOLE AGENDA (Preceding Council Meeting) 7TH FLOOR CONFERENCING CENTER June 14, 2010 Monday, 6:00 p.m. Annexation Update; Emerging Issues in Transportation • Hearing assistance devices for use in the Council Chambers are available upon request to the City Clerk • CITY COUNCIL MEETINGS ARE TELEVISED LIVE ON GOVERNMENT ACCESS CHANNEL 21 AND ARE RECABLECAST: Tues. & Thurs. at 11 AM & 9 PM, Wed. & Fri at 9 AM & 7 PM and Sat. & Sun. at 1 PM & 9 PM Page 2 of 179 CITY OF RENTON COUNCIL AGENDA BILL Subject/Title: Bid opening on June 8, 2010, for CAG-10-044, 2010 Street Patch and Overlay with Curb Ramps Meeting: Regular Council - 14 Jun 2010 Exhibits: Staff Recommendation Bid Tabulation Sheet (five bids) Submitting Data: Dept/Div/Board: Executive Staff Contact: Bonnie Walton, City Clerk, x6502 Recommended Action: Council concur. Fiscal Impact: Expenditure Required: $ 809,772.11 Transfer Amendment: $ Amount Budgeted: $ Revenue Generated: $ Total Project Budget: $ 1,366,859 City Share Total Project: $ SUMMARY OF ACTION: Engineer's Estimate: $968,688.05 In accordance with Council procedure, bids submitted at the subject bid opening met the following three criteria: There was more than one bid, the low bid was within the project budget, and there were no irregularities with the low bid. Therefore, staff recommends acceptance of the low bid submitted by Lakeside Industries, Inc. in the amount of $809,772.11. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Accept the low bid submitted by Lakeside Industries, Inc. in the amount of $809,772.11. 5b. ‐ City Clerk reports bid opening on 6/8/2010 for CAG‐10‐044, Street Patch and Overlay with Curb Ramps project; five bids; engineer's Page 3 of 179 PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT City of ffiroia© MEMORANDUM 1TY OF RENTON DATE: June 9, 2010 TO: Bonnie Walton, City Clerk FROM: Jayson Grant, Pavement Management Technician, ext. 7400 SUBJECT: Bid Opening for 2010 Street Patch and Overlay with Curb Ramps, CAG-10-044 JUN- RECEIVED - CITY CLERK'S OFFICE The bid opening was on Tuesday, June 8, 2010, and there were five bids received. There were two irregularities in the third place bidder's bid from Lakeridge Paving Co. Their bid was $893,698.88 and should be $905,511.38. They still remain as the third place bidder. The Transportation Division recommends that the bid from Lakeside Industries, Inc. be accepted and the contract for the 2010 Street Patch and Overlay with Curb Ramps Project be awarded in the amount of $809,772.11. The total budget for this project is $1,366,859, and it is funded by the Street Overlay Program, the Arterial Rehabilitation Program, cash recovered from construction bonds for work left to be completed for two bankrupt projects, and the 2008 East Renton Plateau Interceptor Section II Sewer Project. The engineer's estimate for the construction of the 2010 Street Patch and Overlay with Curb Ramps Project, under this contract, is $968,688.05. We are requesting that an agenda bill for "Council Concur" be prepared for the June 14, 2010 Council Meeting. If you have any additional questions or concerns please contact me at ext. 7400. Attachment: Bid Tabulation Bob Hanson, Design Supervisor James Wilhoit Civil Engineer 5b. ‐ City Clerk reports bid opening on 6/8/2010 for CAG‐10‐044, Street Patch and Overlay with Curb Ramps project; five bids; engineer's Page 4 of 179 BID TABULATION-2010 STREET PATCH AND OVERLAY WITH CURB RAMPS BID DATE: June 8, 2010 Item Description No. 001. 002. 003. 004. 005. 006. 007. 008. 009. 010. 011. 012. 013. 014. 015. 001. 002. 003. 004. Schedule "A' Mobilization Project Temporary Traffic Control HMA Class 1/2 " PG 64-22 Overlay Removal of Asphalt Concrete Pavement {by Cold Planing) Adjust Monument Adjust Manhole Adjust Water Valve Box Adjust Catch Basin 4" Double Yeilow Paint Centerline 4" Raised Pavement Marker Type 2d, Yellow 4" Raised Pavement Marker Type 2b, Blue 4 " White Edge of Roadiine Crushed Surfacing Top Course Erosion and Sediment Control Finish and Clean Up Schedule "B" Mobilization Project Temporary Traffic Control HMA Class 1/2 " PG 64-22 Overlay Removal of Asphalt Concrete Pavement (by Cold Planing) Unit Lump Sum Lump Sum Ton Square Yard Each Each Each Each Linear Foot Each Each Linear Foot Ton Lump Sum Lump Sum Lump Sum Lump Sum Ton Square Yard Est. Quantity 1.00 1.00 707.00 1,136.00 2.00 11.00 9.00 3.00 775.00 40.00 6.00 1,550.00 20.00 1.00 1.00 City of Renton Engineers Estimate Unit Price $6,000.00 $10,000.00 $70.00 $4.00 $250.00 $350.00 $250.00 $350.00 $0.30 $4.25 $9.00 $0.20 $35.00 $500.00 $400.00 Total Schedule "A" 1.00 1.00 5,425.00 9,102.00 $40,000.00 $65,000.00 $70.00 $4.00 Bid Amount $6,000.00 $10,000.00 $49,490.00 $4,544.00 $500.00 $3,850.00 $2,250.00 $1,050.00 $232.50 $170.00 $54.00 $310.00 $700.00 $500.00 $400.00 $80,050.50 $40,000.00 $65,000.00 $379,750.00 $36,408.00 Contractor: Unit Price $1,000.00 $5,000.00 $64.00 $5.00 $195.00 $340.00 $195.00 $340.00 $0.17 $4.00 $10.00 $0.20 $25.00 $1,000.00 $1,000.00 $35,000.00 $60,000.00 $64.00 $2.35 Lakeside Industries Bid Amount $1,000.00 $5,000.00 $45,248.00 $5,680.00 $390.00 $3,740.00 $1,755.00 $1,020.00 $131.75 $160.00 $60.00 $310.00 $500.00 $1,000.00 $1,000.00 $66,994.75 $35,000.00 $60,000.00 $347,200.00 $21,389.70 Contractor: Unit Price $4,000.00 $3,000.00 $91.51 $2.69 $450.00 $400.00 $275.00 $400.00 $0.17 $4.00 $10.00 $0.20 $20.00 $2,000.00 $2,500.00 $5,000.00 $29,000.00 $75.80 $1.20 Northwest Asphalt, Inc Bid Amount $4,000.00 $3,000.00 $64,697.57 $3,055.84 $900.00 $4,400.00 $2,475.00 $1,200.00 $131.75 $160.00 • $60.00 $310.00 $400.00 $2,000.00 $2,500.00 $89,290.16 $5,000.00 $29,000.00 $411,215.00 $10,922.40 Contractor: Unit Price $5,295.00 $7,500.00 $74.10 $5.10 $175.00 $350.00 $175.00 $300.00 $0.40 $5.50 $8.00 $0.30 $50.00 $1,250.00 $2,500.00 $35,000.00 $22,500.00 $72.55 $3.25 Lakeridge Paving Co Bid Amount $5,295.00 $7,500.00 $52,388.70 $5,793.60 $350.00 $3,850.00 $1,575.00 $900.00 $310.00 $220.00 $48.00 $465.00 $1,000.00 $1,250.00 $2,500.00 $83,445.30 $35,000.00 $22,500.00 $393,583.75 $29,581.50 Contractor: Unit Price 9,400.00 14,000.00 77.00 6.15 210.00 375.00 210.00 375.00 0.20 4.40 11.00 0.20 40.00 210.00 750.00 35,000.00 96,500.00 73.25 3.15 Woodworth & Co Bid Amount $9,400.00 $14,000.00 $54,439.00 $6,986.40 $420.00 $4,125.00 $1,890.00 $1,125.00 $155.00 $176.00 $66.00 $310.00 $800.00 $210.00 $750.00 $94,852.40 $35,000.00 $96,500.00 $397,381.25 $28,671.30 Contractor: Unit Price $ 8,800.00 $ 17,220.00 $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ 69.00 6.00 210.00 365.00 210.00 365.00 0.20 4.50 10.50 0.25 31.00 1,000.00 775.00 57.750.00 $126,170.55 $ $ 66.00 4.00 ICON Materials Bid Amount $8,800.00 $17,220.00 $48,783.00 $6,816.00 $420.00 $4,015.00 $1,890.00 $1,095.00 $155.00 $180.00 $63.00 $387.50 $620.00 $1,000.00 $775.00 $92,219.50 $57,750.00 $125,170.55 $358,050.00 $36,408.00 2010-SCHPR- bid_tab.xls 10-bid tab 5 b . ‐ C i t y C l e r k r e p o r t s b i d o p e n i n g o n 6 / 8 / 2 0 1 0 f o r C A G ‐ 1 0 ‐ 0 4 4 , S t r e e t P a t c h a n d O v e r l a y w i t h C u r b R a m p s p r o j e c t ; f i v e b i d s ; e n g i n e e r ' s P a g e 5 o f 1 7 9 BID TABULATION-2010 STREET PATCH AND OVERLAY WITH CURB RAMPS BID DATE: June 8, 2010 Item Description No. 005. 006. 007. 008. 009. 010. 011. 012. 013. 014. 015. 016. 017. 018. 019. 020. 021. 022. 023. 5" Pavement Excavation Including Haul HMA for Pavement Repair-5" patch Adjust Monument Adjust Manhole Adjust Valve Box Adjust Catch Basin Adjust Gas Valve 4" Raised Pavement Marker Type 1, Yellow 4" Raised Pavement Marker Type 2d, Yellow 4" Raised Pavement Marker Type 1, White 4" Raised Pavement Marker Type 2e, White 4" Raised Pavement Marker Type 2, Blue Plastic Crosswalk (8"Wide) Plastic Stop Bar (18" Wide) Plastic Arrow Induction Loops Curb Ramp, Cement Concrete Type 1 Curb Ramp, Cement Concrete Type 2 Curb Ramp, Cement Concrete Type 3 Unit Square Yard Ton Each Each Each Each Each Each Each Each Each Each Linear Foot Linear Foot Each Each Each Each Each Est. Quantity 1,540.00 527.00 2.00 33.00 45.00 11.00 4.00 4,716.00 644.00 357.00 51.00 24.00 300.00 61.50 80.00 12.00 2.00 4.00 3.00 City of Renton Engineers Estimate Unit Price $15.00 $95.00 $250.00 $350.00 $250.00 $350.00 $250.00 $2.00 $4.25 $2.00 $4.25 $9.00 $2.50 $5.00 $40.00 $600.00 $900.00 $900.00 $900.00 Bid Amount $23,100.00 $50,065.00 $500.00 $11,550.00 $11,250.00 $3,850.00 $1,000.00 $9,432.00 $2,737.00 $714.00 $216.75 $216.00 $750.00 $307.50 $3,200.00 $7,200.00 $1,800.00 $3,600.00 $2,700.00 Contractor: Unit Price $8.75 $75.00 $195.00 $340.00 $195.00 $340.00 $350.00 $1.57 $3.77 $1.77 $4.17 $7.00 $2.57 $2.57 $40.00 $500.00 $900.00 $1,100.00 $1,100.00 Lakeside Industries Bid Amount $13,475.00 $39,525.00 $390.00 $11,220.00 $8,775.00 $3,740.00 $1,400.00 $7,404.12 $2,427.88 $631.89 $212.67 $168.00 $771.00 $158.06 $3,200.00 $6,000.00 $1,800.00 $4,400.00 $3,300.00 Contractor: Unit Price $3.60 $131.75 $450.00 $400.00 $275.00 $400.00 $275.00 . $1.57 $3.77 $1.77 $4.17 $7.00 $2.57 $2.57 $40.00 $650.00 $900.00 $900.00 $900.00 Northwest Asphalt, Inc Bid Amount $5,544.00 $69,432.25 $900.00 $13,200.00 $12,375.00 $4,400.00 $1,100.00 $7,404.12 $2,427.88 $631.89 $212.67 $168.00 $771.00 $158.06 $3,200.00 $7,800.00 $1,800.00 $3,600.00 $2,700.00 Contractor: Unit Price $14.65 $92.25 $175.00 $350.00 $175.00 $300.00 $175.00 $3.00 $3.75 $3.00 $3.75 $8.00 $3.75 $4.50 $58.50 $550.00 $1,000.00 $1,100.00 $1,100,00 Lakeridge Paving Co Bid Amount $22,561.00 $48,615.75 $350.00 $11,550.00 $7,875.00 .$3,300.00 $700.00 $14,148.00 $2,415.00 $1,071.00 $191.25 $192.00 $1,125.00 $276.75 $4,680.00 $6,600.00 $2,000.00 $4,400.00 $3,300.00. Contractor: Unit Price 18.00 82.00 210.00 375.00 210.00 375.00 210.00 1.75 4.15 1.95 4.60 7.70 2.80 2.80 44.00 550.00 950.00 1,050.00 1,000.00 Woodworth & Co Bid Amount $27,720.00 $43,214.00 $420.00 $12,375.00 $9,450.00 $4,125.00 $840.00 $8,253.00 $2,672.60 $696.15 $234.60 $184.80 $840.00 $172.20 $3,520.00 $6,600.00 $1,900.00 $4,200.00 $3,000.00 Contractor: Unit Price $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ 18.00 89.00 210.00 365.00 210.00 365.00 210.00 1.70 4.00 2.00 4.50 8.00 4.00 4,50 59.00 550.00 1,030.00 1,030.00 1,030.00 ICON Materials Bid Amount $27,720.00 $46,903.00 $420.00 $12,045.00 $9,450.00 $4,015.00 $840.00 $8,017.20 $2,576.00 $714.00 $229.50 $192.00 $1,200.00 $276.75 $4,720.00 $6,600.00 $2,060.00 $4,120.00 $3,090.00 2010-SCHPR-bid_tab.xls 10-bid tab 5 b . ‐ C i t y C l e r k r e p o r t s b i d o p e n i n g o n 6 / 8 / 2 0 1 0 f o r C A G ‐ 1 0 ‐ 0 4 4 , S t r e e t P a t c h a n d O v e r l a y w i t h C u r b R a m p s p r o j e c t ; f i v e b i d s ; e n g i n e e r ' s P a g e 6 o f 1 7 9 BID TABULATION-2010 STREET PATCH AND OVERLAY WITH CURB RAMPS BID DATE: June 8, 2010 Item Description No. Curb Ramp, Cement Concrete Type 4 RetrofitTruncated Domes On Exising Curb Ramps Sawcut Concrete 4-6" Sawcut Asphalt 4-8" Crushed Surfacing Top Course Remove Concrete Curb and Gutter Remove Concrete Sidewalk or Curb Ramp Remove Asphalt at Curb and Gutter Cement Concrete Traffic Curb and Gutter Cement Concrete Sidewalk Asphalt Concrete Patch at Curb SGutter HMA Class 1/2 " PG 64-22 City of Renton Engineers Estimate Est. Unit Bid Quantity Price Amount 035. Topsoil, Type A 036. Install Sod Relocate Existing Sign Adjust Utility Box In Curb Ramp Install Beauty Bark Erosion and Sediment Control Finish and Clean Up Each 5.00 Square Foot 8.00 LinearFoot 119.00 Linear Foot 299.50 Ton 40.00 Linear Foot 260.00 Square Yard 230.00 Square Yard 49.00 Linear Foot 4.00 Square Yard 36.50 Ton 38.50 Cubic Yard 7.00 Square Foot 280.00 Each 2.00 Each 2.00 Cubic Yard 1.00 Lump Sum 1.00 Lumpsum 1.00 $900.00 Schedule "C" 001. Mobilization Lump Sum 002. Project Temporary Traffic Control Lump Sum 003. HMA Class 1/2 " PG 64-22 Overlay Ton 1.00 $20,000.00 1.00 $30,000.00 96.00 $70.00 $4,500.00 $480.00 $3.00 $2.00 $35.00 $15.00 $25.00 $20.00 $25.00 $35.00 $110.00 $75.00 $3.00 $200.00 $100.00 $225.00 $600.00 $500.00 ule "B" $357.00 $599.00 $1,400.00 $3,900.00 $5,750.00 $980.00 $100.00 $1,277.50 $4,235.00 $525.00 $840.00 $400.00 - $200.00 $225.00 $600.00 $500.00 $682,214.75 $5.00 $4.00 $25.00 $20.00 $30.00 $30.00 $24.00 $44.00 $100.00 $75.00 $3.00 $200.00 $150.00 $100.00 $2,500.00 $5,000.00 $20,000.00 $30,000.00 $55,720.00 Contractor: Lakeside Industries Unit Price Bid Amount $5,000.00 $5,000.00 $64.00 $5,000.00 $5,000.00 $50,944.00 Contractor: Northwest Asphalt, Inc Contractor: Lakeridge Paving Co Contractor: Woodworth 8u Co Contractor: ICON Materials Unit Price $595.00 $1,198.00 $1,000.00 $5,200,00 $6,900.00 $1,470.00 $96.00 $1,606.00 $3,850.00 $525.00 $840.00 $400.00 $300.00 $100.00 $2,500.00 $5,000.00 $608,988.32 $4.00 $4.00 $20.00 $20.00 $35.00 $45.00 $55.00 $45.00 $130.00 $40.00 $3.00 $200.00 $400.00 $200.00 $1,000.00 $2,000.00 $5,000.00 $5,400.00 $88.75 Unit Price Bid Amount Unit Bid Price Amount Unit Price $4,500.00 $1,050.00 $476.00 $1,198.00 $800.00 $5,200.00 $8,050.00 $2,205.00 $220.00 $1,642.50 $5,005.00 $280.00 $840.00 $400.00 $800.00 $200.00 $1,000.00 $2,000.00 29,218.77 $4.75 $2.25 $50.00 $11.00 $36.00 $32.50 $42.00 $42.00 $150.00 $85.00 $3.50 $200.00 $200.00 $350.00 $1,250.00 $2,500.00 $565.25 $673.88 $2,000.00 $2,860.00 $8,280.00 $1,592.50 $168.00 $1,533.00 $5,775.00 $595.00 $980.00 $400.00 $400.00 $350.00 $1,250.00 $2,500.00 $651,708.63 5.00 4.00 40.00 20.70 34.50 34.50 52.00 40.00 120.00 100.00 3.50 220.00 800.00 125.00 800.00 3,000.00 $5,000.00 $9,500.00 $5,400.00 $10,000.00 $70,645.00 $72.65 $9,500.00 $10,000.00 $57,829.40 $4,325.00 $ 1,030.00 $480.00 $ 60.00 $61,292.00 9.00 Bid Amount $595.00 $1,198.00 $1,600.00 $5,382.00 $7,935.00 $1,690.50 $208.00 $1,460.00 $4,620.00 $700.00 $980.00 $440.00 $1,600.00 $125.00 $800.00 $3,000.00 $725,108.40 $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ 7.00 4.00 26.50 18.00 17.00 52.00 27.00 31.00 112.00 68.00 2.00 98.00 400.00 385.00 1,525.00 1,550.00 $833.00 $1,198.00 $1,060.00 $4,680.00 $3,910.00 $2,548.00 $108.00 $1,131.50 $4,312.00 $476.00 $560.00 $196.00 $800.00 $385.00 $1,525.00 $1,550.00 $743,469.50 $11,000.00 $ 18,783.00 $18,783.00 $15,750.00 $ 17,580.00 $17,580.00 $54,924.00 2010-SCHPR- bidjab.xls 10-bid tab 5 b . ‐ C i t y C l e r k r e p o r t s b i d o p e n i n g o n 6 / 8 / 2 0 1 0 f o r C A G ‐ 1 0 ‐ 0 4 4 , S t r e e t P a t c h a n d O v e r l a y w i t h C u r b R a m p s p r o j e c t ; f i v e b i d s ; e n g i n e e r ' s P a g e 7 o f 1 7 9 BID TABULATION-2010 STREET PATCH AND OVERLAY WITH CURB RAMPS BID DATE: June 8, 2010 Item Description No. 004. 005. 006. 007. 008. 009. 010. 011. 012. 013. 014. 015. 016. 017. 018. 019. Removal of Asphalt Concrete Pavement By Cold Planing 4" Pavement Excavation Including Haul HMA for Pavement Repalr-4" patch Adjust Monument Adjust Manhole Adjust Valve Box Adjust Catch Basin Adjust Gas Valve 4" Raised Pavement Marker Type 2d, Yellow 4" Raised Pavement Marker Type 2e, White 4" Raised Pavement Marker Type 2b, Blue Plastic Stop Bar (18" Wide) 12 " thermo Plastic on Speed Bumps Crushed Surfacing Top Course Erosion and Sediment Control Finish and Clean Up Unit Square Yard Square Yard Ton Each Each Each Each Each Each Each Each Linear Foot Linear Foot Ton Lump Sum Lump Sum Est. Quantity 1,745.00 2,105.00 480.00 6.00 9.00 2.00 5.00 1.00 12.00 96.00 4.00 14.00 260.00 20.00 1.00 1.00 City of Renton Engineers Estimate Unit Bid Price Amount $4.00 $14.00 $95.00 $250.00 $350.00 $250.00 $350.00 $250.00 $2.00 $4.25 $9.00 $5.00 $6.00 $40.00 $500.00 $500.00 Total Schedule "C" Subtotal Schedule "A" 9.5% Sales Tax on Sen "A" only Total Schedule "A" Total Schedule "B" Total Schedule "C" Total Schedules "A", "B"and "C" $6,980.00 $29,470.00 $45,600.00 $1,500.00 $3,150.00 $500.00 $1,750.00 $260.00 $24.00 $408.00 $36.00 $70.00 $1,560.00 $800.00 $500.00 $500.00 $198,818.00 $80,050.50 $7,604.80' $87,655.30 $682,214.75 $198,818.00 $968,688.05 Contractor: Unit Price $3.50 $6.50 $75.00 $195.00 $340.00 $195.00 $340.00 $350.00 $3.77 $4.17 $7.00 $4.77 $3.77 $25.00 $1,000.00 $1,000.00 Lakeside industries Bid Amount $6,107.50 $13,682.50 $36,000.00 $1,170.00 $3,060.00 $390.00 $1,700.00 $350.00 $45.24 $400.32 $28.00 $66.78 $980.20 $500.00 $1,000.00 $1,000.00 $127,424.54 $66,994.75 $6,364.50 $73,359.25 $608,988.32 $127,424.54 $809,772.11 Contractor: Unit Price $1.20 $4.30 $108.75 $450.00 $400.00 $275.00 $400.00 $275.00 $3.77 $4.17 $7.00 $4.77 $3.77 $20.00 $2,500.00 $2,000.00 Northwest Asphalt, Inc Bid Amount $2,094.00 $9,051.50 $52,200.00 $2,700.00 $3,600.00 $550.00 $2,000.00 $275.00 $45.24 $400.32 $28.00 $66.78 $980.20 $400.00 $2,500.00 $2,000.00 $159,936.04 $89,290.16 $8,482.57 $97,772.73 $629,218.77 $159,936.04 $886,927.53 Contractor: Unit Price $5.10 $9.25 $92.25 $175.00 $350.00 $175.00 $300.00 $175.00 $3.75 $3.75 $8.00 $4.50 $3.75 $50.00 $1,250.00 $2,500.00 Lakeridge Paving Co • Bid Amount $8,899.50 $19,471.25 $44,280.00 $1,050.00 $3,150.00 $350.00 $1,500.00 $175.00 $45.00 $360.00 $32.00 $63.00 $975.00 $1,000.00 $1,250.00 $2,500.00 $162;430.15 $83,445.30 $7,927.30 $91,372.60 $651,708.63 $162,430.15 $905,511.38 Contractor: Unit Price 5.30 13.70 85.00 210.00 375.00 210.00 375.00 210.00 4.15 4.60 7.70 5.25 4.15 40.00 350.00 750.00 Woodworth & Co Bid Amount $9,248.50 $28,838.50 $40,800.00 $1,260.00 $3,375.00 $420.00 $1,875.00 $210.00 $49.80 $441.60 $30.80 $73.50 $1,079.00 $800.00 $350.00 $750.00 $177,643.70 $94,852.40 $9,010.98 $103,863.38 $725,108.40 $177,643.70 $1,006,615.48 Contractor: Unit Price $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ 7.00 11,00 90.00 210.00 365.00 210.00 365.00 210.00 4.00 4.50 8.00 5.00 4.00 31.00 1,050.00 776.00 ICON Materials Bid Amount $12,215.00 $23,155.00 $43,200.00 $1,260.00 $3,285.00 $420.00 $1,825.00 $210.00 $48.00 $432.00 $32.00 $70.00 $1,040.00 $620.00 $1,050.00 $776.00 $180,925.00 $92,219.50 $8,760.85 $100,960.35 $743,469.50 $180,925.00 $1,025,374.85 2010-SCHPR-bidJab.xls 10-bid tab 5 b . ‐ C i t y C l e r k r e p o r t s b i d o p e n i n g o n 6 / 8 / 2 0 1 0 f o r C A G ‐ 1 0 ‐ 0 4 4 , S t r e e t P a t c h a n d O v e r l a y w i t h C u r b R a m p s p r o j e c t ; f i v e b i d s ; e n g i n e e r ' s P a g e 8 o f 1 7 9 CITY OF RENTON BID TABULATION SHEET PROJECT: 2010 Street Patch and Overlay with Curb Ramps CAG-10-044 DATE: June 8, 2010 Page 1 of 1 BIDDER FORMS Proposal Triple Form Bid Bond Sched. Of Prices Addenda BID **lncludes Sales Tax ICON Materials 6819 S. 228th St. Kent, WA 98138-2050 B.E. Harjehausen Lakeridge Paving Co., LLC P.O. Box 8500 Covington, WA 98042 Jon Cheetham Lakeside Industries 18808 SE 257th St. Covington, WA 98042 Craig Nickel Miles Resources, LLC dba Woodworth & Company 1200 East D St. Tacoma, WA 98421 Cedric Brooks Northwest Asphalt, Inc. P.O. Box 2260 Renton, WA 98056 Josh Gill ENGINEER'S ESTIMATE LEGEND: Forms: Triple Form: Non-Collusion Affidavit, Anti-Trust Claims, Minimum Wage $1,025,374.86 $893,698.88 $809,772.11 $1,006,615.48 $886,927.54 $960,751.05 $968,688.05 5b. ‐ City Clerk reports bid opening on 6/8/2010 for CAG‐10‐044, Street Patch and Overlay with Curb Ramps project; five bids; engineer's Page 9 of 179 CITY OF RENTON COUNCIL AGENDA BILL Subject/Title: Sunset Area Consultant Contract Meeting: Regular Council - 14 Jun 2010 Exhibits: Issue Paper Contract with CH2MHill (with attached scope of work) Submitting Data: Dept/Div/Board: Community and Economic Development Staff Contact: Erika Conkling, AICP (x6578) Recommended Action: Refer to Finance Committee Fiscal Impact: Expenditure Required: $ 630,000 Transfer Amendment: $60,000 Amount Budgeted: $ 570,000 Revenue Generated: $n/a Total Project Budget: $ 630,000 City Share Total Project: $ 630,000 SUMMARY OF ACTION: In November 2009 Council adopted the Sunset Area Community Investment Strategy which identified nine priorities for public investment in the Renton Highlands. Four of the nine priorities included: supporting the redevelopment of the Renton Housing Authority's Sunset Terrace project, completing a planned action and environmental impact statement for the area, designing pedestrian and landscaping improvements for Sunset Boulevard, and enhancing the area with green connections which provide both a public amenity and sub-regional stormwater control. Using a competitive process, the City selected the consulting firm CH2MHill and negotiated a scope of work to undertake these four strategies for an amount not to exceed $630,000. Approval of the contract with CH2MHill will also require an allocation of $60,000 from the reserves of the Highlands revitalization fund. This will occurr in a future second quarter budget amendment. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Approve professional services contract with CH2MHill for an amount not to exceed $630,000 and authorize the Mayor and the City Clerk to sign this contract. 5c. ‐ Community and Economic Development Department recommends approval of a contract in the amount of $630,000 with CH2M Hill for Page 10 of 179 DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY AND ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT M E M O R A N D U M DATE:June 14, 2010 TO:Don Persson, President Members of the Renton City Council FROM:Alex Pietsch, CED Administrator VIA:Denis Law, Mayor STAFF CONTACT:Erika Conkling, AICP, Senior Planner (x-6578) SUBJECT:Consultant Contract for Sunset Area Planned Action, EIS and Related Work ISSUE: Should the City approve a $630,000 contract with CH2MHill to complete a planned action, Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) for the planned action, master drainage plan for storm water management, and conceptual improvements to Sunset Boulevard? RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends referral of this issue to the Finance Committee for further review and discussion. Staff also recommends approval of the consulting contract with CH2MHill to complete the attached scope of work for an amount not to exceed $630,000. BACKGROUND SUMMARY: The City has been working on the revitalization of the Sunset Area of the Renton Highlands for more than a decade, approaching the issue from several different angles. In February 2009, Council adopted the recommended Highlands Action Plan based on the work of the second phase of the Highlands Task Force. This work program involved a number of recommendations for actions that involved everything from simple code changes to major infrastructure projects. Using the Task Force Action Plan as a guide, consultants put together the Sunset Area Community Investment Strategy (Sunset CIS) which prioritized major projects in the area. Council adopted the Sunset CIS in late 2009. Nine strategies for revitalization were prioritized in the Sunset CIS. These strategies were listed in order of priority as: 1.Support Sunset Terrace Redevelopment 2.Pursue Planned Action EIS 3.Incorporate new Highlands Library into Sunset Terrace Redevelopment 4.Incorporate a public plaza as a community “third place” into Sunset Terrace 5c. ‐ Community and Economic Development Department recommends approval of a contract in the amount of $630,000 with CH2M Hill for Page 11 of 179 Sunset Planned Action EIS Consulting Contract Page 2 of 4 June 14, 2010 Redevelopment 5.Creation of one or more Community Gardens 6.Design and construct pedestrian, landscaping improvements on Sunset Boulevard 7.Consider opportunities to make “green connections” by integrating stormwater conveyance systems in new and existing infrastructure that also serve as community amenities 8.Better utilization of recreation and park facilities 9.Explore development of a Family Village on North Highlands “Superblock” Since the adoption of the report, City staff has been pursuing these strategies. This spring, the City advertised for consultants to begin work on a Planned Action and EIS and other work for the Sunset Area. Conceptual design of Sunset Boulevard improvements, a stormwater Master Drainage Plan with “green connection” options, and federal level environmental review (NEPA) for the redevelopment of Sunset Terrace comprised the other work in the advertisement. The Planned Action and EIS will complete the state level environmental review (SEPA) for the redevelopment of the entire study area, including the Sunset CIS revitalization strategies and piecemeal redevelopment of private properties under the current zoning. It will include analysis of impacts to parks, recreation, utilities, and transportation networks. Once the EIS is completed and the Planned Action is in place, the environmental work for future development in this area will be done and projects implementing the revitalization effort can then be fast tracked for approval. Coupled with master drainage plan and the conceptual design work for Sunset Boulevard and for the green connections, the Planned Action and EIS will position the City for future state and federal implementation funding for construction. After reviewing several firm’s statements of qualifications, and interviewing the top firms, an interagency team composed of representatives of RHA and several City departments selected the firm CH2MHill for this project. CH2MHill would serve as the primary consultant with a number of subconsultants, including ICF Jones and Stokes, Mithun (authors of the Sunset CIS), and a few others. City staff and RHA have negotiated a unique scope of work with CH2MHill that includes programmatic environmental review for all of the revitalization projects as a whole, as well as some project level specifics for key implementing projects. The proposed contract with the City will result in the completion of a Planned Action and EIS, a Master Drainage Plan, and conceptual design of the Sunset Boulevard Improvements. Consultant selection and scope of work development have yielded a proposed contract for $630,000 for professional services. The proposed budget for this project comes from the $1.5 million allocation for Highlands Redevelopment Council originally made in 2000. With the adoption of the Highlands Action Plan, Council earmarked part of the allocation for specific projects recommended in that plan. Part of the money has been spent as allocated, on projects such as professional services for the Sunset CIS, boulevard improvements, and sidewalk upgrades. Budget earmarked for Sunset Boulevard improvements, design of a sub-regional stormwater facility, and implementation of future capital improvements 5c. ‐ Community and Economic Development Department recommends approval of a contract in the amount of $630,000 with CH2M Hill for Page 12 of 179 Sunset Planned Action EIS Consulting Contract Page 3 of 4 June 14, 2010 would be used to fund the proposed consulting contract for this project. The details of which are shown below. Highland Action Plan Project 2009 Allocation Past Spending Detail Proposed Contract Spending Detail Visioning and planning for the “Third Place,” building off RHA concepts $50,000 $50,000 spent on Sunset CIS. Design and planning for Sunset Boulevard improvements $300,000 $60,000 earmarked as local match for Landing to the Highlands trail design. $240,000 for conceptual design and planning work in the Planned Action and EIS. Strategic sidewalk repairs $250,000 $120,000 spent in 2009/2010. Feasibility analysis and conceptual design of sub-regional stormwater facility $200,000 $200,000 for Master Drainage Plan and planning work in the Planned Action and EIS. Implementation and future capital improvements $700,000 $100,000 spent on water main improvements in 2009. $190,000 for the Planned Action and EIS to conduct environmental review for future implementation projects. Total Fund $1,500,000 Total Spent to Date $330,000 Total Proposed- this Contract $630,000 Total Remaining Funds $540,000 Although there is $1,170,000 in the Highlands revitalization fund, only $570,000 remains in the appropriated 2010 budget. The remaining $600,000 is currently in the reserved fund balance. Approval of the contract will require an allocation of $60,000 from the fund reserves into the 2010 budget. This will occur as part of a future budget amendment for the second quarter of 2010. CONCLUSION: Approval of the consultant contract with CH2MHill and budget amendment moves the City forward in accomplishing the work plan of the Highlands Action Plan and the investment priorities of the Sunset Area Community Investment Strategy. Cc:Denis Law, Mayor Jay Covington, CAO Terry Higashiyama, Community Services Administrator 5c. ‐ Community and Economic Development Department recommends approval of a contract in the amount of $630,000 with CH2M Hill for Page 13 of 179 Sunset Planned Action EIS Consulting Contract Page 4 of 4 June 14, 2010 Iwen Wang, Finance and Information Services Administrator Gregg Zimmerman, Public Works Administrator Rich Perteet, Deputy Public Works Administrator Leslie Betlach, Parks Director Suzanne Dale Estey, Economic Development Director Lys Hornsby, Utilities Systems Director Chip Vincent, Planning Director Jim Seitz, Transportation Planning and Program Supervisor Ron Straka, Surface Water Utility Engineering Supervisor 5c. ‐ Community and Economic Development Department recommends approval of a contract in the amount of $630,000 with CH2M Hill for Page 14 of 179 CivicWeb: CH2MH111 Consulting Contract.docx Page 1 of 3 CONSULTANT AGREEMENT THIS AGREEMENT is made as of the day of , 20 , between the CITY OF RENTON, a municipal corporation of the State of Washington, hereinafter referred to as "CITY" and CH2M Hill, hereinafter referred to as "CONSULTANT", for their services related to Sunset Area Planned Action EIS, hereinafter referred to as "PROJECT". Information shall be made available for use by the City of Renton Staff and City Council. The CITY and CONSULTANT agree as set forth below: 1. Scope of Services. The Consultant will provide all labor necessary to perform all work, which is described in the attached Scope of Services (Exhibit A). This Agreement and Exhibit hereto contain the entire agreement of the parties and supersedes all prior oral or written representation or understandings. This Agreement may only be amended by written agreement of the parties. The scope of work may be amended as provided herein. The standard of care applicable to Consultant's Services will be the degree of skill and diligence normally employed by professional engineers or consultants performing the same or similar Services at the time said services are performed. If the City shows that Consultant has failed to meet this standard, consultant will re- perform any services not meeting this standard without additional compensation. The City will provide to Consultant all applicable data in City's possession relating to Consultant's services on the Project. Consultant will reasonably rely upon the accuracy, timeliness, and completeness of the information provided by City. Unless otherwise agreed to in the Scope of Services, City will obtain, arrange, and pay for all advertisements for bids; permits and licenses required by local, state, or federal authorities; and land, easements, rights-of-way, and access necessary for Consultant's services or Project construction. 2. Changes in Scope of Services. The City, without invalidating the Consultant Agreement, may order changes in the services consisting of additions, deletions or modifications, and adjust the fee accordingly. Such changes in the work shall be authorized by written agreement signed by the City and Consultant. If the project scope requires less time, a lower fee will be charged. If additional work is required, the consultant will not proceed without a written change order from the City. If any provision of this Agreement is held to be invalid, the remainder of the Agreement shall remain in full force and effect to serve the purposes and objectives of this Agreement. 3. Time of Performance. The Consultant shall complete performance of the Consultant Agreement for the items under Consultant's control in accordance with Exhibit A. If items not under the Consultant's control impact the time of performance, the Consultant will notify the City. 4. Term of Consultant Agreement. The term of this Agreement shall end at completion of the scope of work identified in Exhibit A, but no later than June 30, 2011. This Agreement may be extended to accomplish change orders, if required, upon mutual written agreement of the City and the Consultant. 5. Consultant Agreement Sum. The total amount of this Agreement is not to exceed the sum of six-hundred-thirty thousand dollars ($ 630,000.00) . Washington State Sales Tax is not required. The Cost Estimate provided by the Consultant to the City specifies total cost. 6. Method of Payment. Payment by the City for services rendered will be made after a voucher or invoice is submitted in the form specified by the City. Payment will be made within thirty (30) days after receipt of such voucher or invoice. The City shall have the right to withhold payment to the Consultant for work not completed in a manner that meets the standard of care as defined under Section 1 until such time as the Consultant modifies such work so to meet that http ://renton.civicweb.net/Documents/DocumentDisplay .aspx?Print= 1 &ID=3 45 8 06/10/2010 5c. ‐ Community and Economic Development Department recommends approval of a contract in the amount of $630,000 with CH2M Hill for Page 15 of 179 CivicWeb: CH2MHill Consulting Contract.docx Page 2 of 3 standard. 7. Record Maintenance and Work Product. The Consultant shall maintain accounts and records, which properly reflect all direct and indirect costs expended and services provided in the performance of this Agreement. The Consultant agrees to provide access to any records required by the City. All originals and copies of work product, exclusive of Consultant's proprietary items protected by copyright such as computer programs, methodology, methods, materials, and forms, shall belong to the City, including records, files, computer disks, magnetic media or material which may be produced by Consultant while performing the services. Reuse by the City or by others, acting through or on behalf of the City of any such instruments of service, not occurring as a part of this PROJECT, shall be without liability or legal exposure to the Consultant. Consultant will grant the City the right to use and copy Consultant copyright materials as an inseparable part of the work product provided. 8. Assignment Agreement. The Consultant shall not assign any portion of this consultant Agreement without express written consent of the City of Renton. 9. Hold Harmless. The Consultant shall indemnify, defend and hold harmless the City, its officers, agents, employees and volunteers, from and against claims, losses or liability, or any portion thereof, including attorneys fees and costs, arising from injury or death to persons, including injuries, sickness, disease or death of Consultant's own employees, or damage to property to the proportionate extent caused by a negligent act or omission of the Consultant, except for those acts caused by or resulting from a negligent act or omission by the City and its officers, agents, employees and volunteers. Should a court of competent jurisdiction determine that this agreement is subject to RCW 4.24.115, then, in the event of liability for damages arising out of bodily injury to persons or damages to property caused by or resulting from the concurrent negligence of the contractor and the city, its officers, officials, employees and volunteers, the contractor's liability hereunder shall be only to the proportionate extent of the contractor's negligence. It is further specifically and expressly understood that the indemnification provided herein constitute the contractor's waiver of immunity under the Industrial Insurance Act, Title 51 RCW, solely for the purposes of this indemnification. This waiver has been mutually negotiated by the parties. The provisions of this section shall survive the expiration or termination of this agreement. 10. Insurance. The Consultant shall secure and maintain commercial liability insurance in the amount of $1,000,000 in full force throughout the duration of this Consultant Agreement. It is agreed that on the CONTRACTOR'S policy, the City of Renton will be named as Additional Insured(s) on a non-contributory primary basis. A certificate of insurance and the Primary & Non- Contributory Additional Insurance Endorsement page, properly endorsed, shall be delivered to the City before executing the work of this agreement. Please note: The cancellation language should read "Should any of the above described policies be cancelled before the expiration date thereof, the issuing company will mail 45 days written notice to the certificate holder named to the left." 11. Independent Contractor. Any and all employees of the Consultant, while engaged in the performance of any work or services required by the Consultant under this agreement, shall be considered employees of the Consultant only and not of the City. The Consultant's relation to the City shall be at all times as an independent contractor. Any and all claims that may or might arise under the Workman's Compensation Act on behalf of said employees, while so engaged, and claims made by a third party as a consequence of a negligent act or omission, to the proportionate extent caused on the part of the Consultant's employees, while so engaged on any of the work or services provided to be rendered herein, shall be the obligation and responsibility of the Consultant. 12. Compliance with Laws. The Consultant and all of the Consultant's employees shall http://renton.civicweb.net/Documents/DocumentDisplay.aspx?Print=l&ID=3458 06/10/2010 5c. ‐ Community and Economic Development Department recommends approval of a contract in the amount of $630,000 with CH2M Hill for Page 16 of 179 CivicWeb: CH2MHill Consulting Contract.docx Page 3 of 3 perform the services in accordance with all applicable federal, state, county and city laws, codes and ordinances. Discrimination Prohibited: Consultant, with regard to work performed under this agreement, will not discriminate on the grounds of race, color, national origin, religion, creed, age, sex, the presence of any physical or sensory handicap, or sexual orientation, in the selection and/or retention of employees, or procurement of materials or supplies. This agreement is entered into as of the day and year written above. CONSULTANT CITY OF RENTON Principal CH2M HILL, Inc. 1100 112th Ave NE Suite 400 Bellevue, WA 98004 APPROVED AS TO FORM: ATTEST: City Attorney Bonnie I. Walton, City Clerk http://renton.civicweb.net/Documents/DocumentDisplay.aspx?Print=l&ID=3458 06/10/2010 5c. ‐ Community and Economic Development Department recommends approval of a contract in the amount of $630,000 with CH2M Hill for Page 17 of 179 Civic Web: Scope of Work.docx Page 1 of 39 Introduction The City of Renton (CITY) recently approved the Sunset Area Community Investment Strategy (CIS) that culminated a significant effort prioritizing public investment in the Sunset Area. The coordinated planning and environmental review outlined in this scope of work (SOW) will provide the CITY, Renton Housing Authority (RHA), Renton School District, Washington State Department of Transportation (WSDOT), and the King County Library System (KCLS) streamlined land use authority to implement a broad range of improvements throughout the neighborhood. It will also simplify the redevelopment process for private developers, increasing the likelihood that planned public agency investments would lead to a transformation of the community. The overarching vehicle to support Sunset Area revitalization is the SEPA Planned Action Environmental Impact Statement (EIS). Because the RHA elements of the project create a direct federal nexus, NEPA compliance is required under Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) regulations .£1] SEPA specifically authorizes the use of NEPA documents for the purpose of SEPA compliance. Therefore, this scope of work will produce an EIS that meets both federal and state environmental compliance requirements. The five additional elements of the project - Sunset Boulevard improvements; master drainage plan; parks and recreation planning; city infrastructure improvements; and positioning for state and federal funding - provide essential input into the NEPA and SEPA compliance processes. The City of Renton (CITY) and RHA have selected the CH2MHill team (the Consultant) to implement a scope of services that completes the environmental review and related roadway, drainage, parks and recreation, public services, infrastructure, and funding elements of the project. The scope includes the following tasks: Task 1. Proposal Definition and Project Strategies Task 2. Alternatives Formulation Task 3. Scoping and Public Outreach Task 4. Refine Alternatives and Technical Analysis Task 5. NEPA/SEPA Documentation Task 6. Complete NEPA Notices Task 7. Agency, Stakeholder, and Commtmity Coordination Task 8. Project Management Task 9. Stormwater Task 10. Sunset Boulevard Task 11. Parks Task 12. Utilities Task 13. Optional Services This scope of services presents the overall project approach, assumptions, and deliverables. Elements of work in the scope are required for Sunset Terrace proposals such as NEPA compliance, resident consultations, affordable housing studies and other tasks. Other elements of the work are required for the CITY such as the Planned Action EIS and Ordinance, library replacement, and other tasks. Finally, many of the tasks described are necessary for each agency to achieve its objectives. The accompanying fee estimate identifies the level of effort for each task and the relative share attributable to the CITY or RHA. The Consultant team includes the following firms with the following roles: • CH2M HILL, Inc.: Overall Project Management; Lead for Streets, Drainage, Water, Sewer, and Parks and Recreation • Contact: Roger Mason, PE, Project Manager, 425-233-3498, Roger.Mason@CH2M.com http://renton.civicweb.net/Documents/DocumentDisplay.aspx?Print=l&ID=3457 06/10/2010 5c. ‐ Community and Economic Development Department recommends approval of a contract in the amount of $630,000 with CH2M Hill for Page 18 of 179 Civic Web: Scope of Work.docx Page 2 of 39 > ICF International (contracting as Jones & Stokes Associates, Inc. a wholly owned subsidiary of ICF Consulting Group, Inc.): Planned Action EIS Lead, Support on Funding Strategies • Contact: Lisa Grueter, Senior Planner, Deputy Project Manager, 206-801-2816, lgrueter@icfi.com • Heartland LLC: Market Study Lead • Contact: Matt Anderson, Principal, (206) 682-2500. manderson@htland.com • Mithun: Urban Design Lead • Contact: Doug Leigh, Principal, 206.623.3344, dougl@mithun.com • Chris Webb & Associates, Inc.: Strategic Advisor, Low Impact Development • Contact: Chris Webb, Principal, 360-752-0088, chris@chriswebbpe.com • EJP Consulting Group, LLC: Strategic Advisor, HUD Demolition and Disposition Application • Contact: Scott Jepson, Partner, 206.546.0635 Jepsen@ejpconsultinggroup.com • Weinman Consulting, LLC: Strategic Advisor, NEPA/SEPA Compliance • Contact: Richard Weinman, Principal, 206.295.0783, Richardw-llc@comcast.net Each member of the Consultant team will participate in a collaborative manner in the phases of the project based on the budgeted level of effort and this scope of work. 1. http://renton.civicweb.net/Docxrments/DocumentDisplay.aspx?Print=l&ID=3457 06/10/2010 5c. ‐ Community and Economic Development Department recommends approval of a contract in the amount of $630,000 with CH2M Hill for Page 19 of 179 CivicWeb: Scope of Work-docx Page 3 of 39 Proposal Definition and Project Strategies 1. Project Chartering Meeting - JOINT Chartering is a structured process used to guide a project team through the process of defining itself: its purpose, critical success factors, goals, roles and responsibilities, operating guidelines, interpersonal behaviors, and other elements that give a team the clarity of purpose essential for performance. A Chartering session is different from a conventional project "kickoff," in that kickoffs tend to focus on one-way communication of the "what's," such as milestones, deliverables, schedules, etc. Whereas chartering uses two-way communication to engage team members and other participants to define the "how" of the project, such as responsibilities, operating guidelines, etc. A tangible product of this process is a written charter document which has been endorsed by all the participants of the chartering session. The Sunset Area Planned Action EIS chartering session will be designed and executed to: • Build clarity, agreement and motivation among the participants at the beginning of a project • Increase the probability that the team will be successful • Empower team members, maximizing their effectiveness and influence • Provide better use of the collective resources and knowledge of the project team • Provide means to monitor performance so problems can be diagnosed and corrective actions can be taken • Provide that team members share the same vision for the project • Help to create team behaviors that are stronger than individual behaviors Chartering for the Sunset Area Project will • Define the team through its membership and organizational linkages and priorities • Establish purpose the project's, vision, mission, boundary conditions, critical success factors and measures of success • Set responsibilities; collective and individual • Determine operating guidelines In addition to the chartering elements the Consultant will facilitate a discussion of guiding principles based on the CIS, and the elements to consider as alternative concepts are developed. Task 1.1 Deliverables: • Charter Document: A written summary of the formal chartering elements for a project that includes, the Team Membership, Project Purpose Statement, Critical Success Factors, Goals, Roles & Responsibilities, and Operating Guidelines. Charter documents should be formally endorsed and shared with individuals and groups with whom the project team has primary interface and communications. It will also including guiding principles based on the CIS. 2. Define RHA Proposals - RHA http://renton.civicweb.net/Documents/DocumentDisplay.aspx?Print=l&ID=3457 06/10/2010 5c. ‐ Community and Economic Development Department recommends approval of a contract in the amount of $630,000 with CH2M Hill for Page 20 of 179 Civic Web: Scope of Work.docx Page 4 of 39 Working with the RHA and Shelter Resources (SRI), the Consultant will determine the basic program elements that need to be included for the Sunset Terrace (i.e. properties as shown on the Bumgardner plan). Consultant will review the base information available regarding the RHA's resources including inventory and properties to understand the potential opportunities and constraints. Once collected, Consultant will develop a general redevelopment strategy that is compatible with the Bumgardner plan. The Consultant will evaluate the capacity for each RHA site and the potential opportunities for land swaps within the neighborhood as well as coordinate with CITY investments, i.e. the library, potential open space/plaza/third place for the neighborhood. This effort will feed into Task 2.1. Task 1.2 Deliverables: • Draft and Final general redevelopment strategy for RHA. 3. Data Collection and Existing Conditions Assessment - CITY The CITY will provide the Consultant will all available geographic information system (GIS) layers related to parcels, land use, zoning, critical areas, buildings, facilities, utilities, etc. The Consultant will prepare a data needs list regarding available reports and studies relevant to the study area, and the CITY will assist the Consultant in collecting them. Task 1.3 Deliverables: • Data needs list Task 1.3 Assumptions • CITY will provide available and relevant GIS layers to Consultant. • CITY will assist the Consultant to collect available reports and studies relevant to the study area. 4. Project Strategies - JOINT 1. SEPA/NEPA Compliance Strategies Together with CITY and RHA staff, the Consultant will meet once with appropriate HUD environmental staff to introduce the project and discuss NEPA compliance. The Consultant will prepare a brief summary memorandum describing strategies for the integrated NEPA/SEPA EIS, such as confirming lead agency/responsible entity rules, analysis approach, contacts, and roles and responsibilities. The Consultant will prepare EIS templates for CITY and RHA review. After CITY and RHA review, the Consultant will prepare revised templates for distribution to the Consultant team. The process assumes that the City will be the SEPA lead agency and the NEPA responsible entity. Task 1.4.1 Deliverables: • A Draft and Final Memorandum documenting NEPA/SEPA compliance strategies for the project. • One meeting with CITY, RHA, HUD, and Consultant of no more than 4 hours to introduce the project and discuss NEPA compliance. Task 1.4.1 Assumptions: • Meeting with HUD will be no longer than four hours and will be attended by two Consultant team http://renton.civicweb.net/Documents/DocumentDisplay.aspx?Print=l&ID=3457 06/10/2010 5c. ‐ Community and Economic Development Department recommends approval of a contract in the amount of $630,000 with CH2M Hill for Page 21 of 179 Civic Web: Scope of Work.docx Page 5 of 39 members and may include a representative from the CITY and RHA. 2. Funding Application Criteria, Strategies, and Marketing Brochure The Consultant will review the criteria for targeted applications for funding to determine requirements and to streamline deliverables throughout the process. Possible funding streams include: • HUD Choice Neighborhoods Initiative • H&HS early childhood, and others • EPA Sustainable Communities • HOME program > CDBG • Ecology, LID and infrastructure funding > USDOT; TCSP, TIGER • State Department of Commerce, CERB, others The Consultant will focus on the federal sources that may be new sources to the City. The Consultant will prepare a project brief that describes the key elements of the project and helps market the neighborhood and proposals to funding agencies. The piece is anticipated to be a four-page color fold out. Task 1.4.2 Deliverables: • Draft and Final versions of a brief Memorandum outlining funding criteria and approaches to assure incorporation of those criteria into the overall project execution. • Four page marketing brochure. 3. Public Involvement Strategies The Consultant will assist the CITY in developing a public involvement strategy for the EIS process. Task 1.4.3 Deliverables: • Draft and Final versions of a brief Memorandum outlining a public involvement strategy for the overall EIS public process. 2. Alternatives Formulation 1. Sunset Terrace - RHA Based on definition efforts in Task 1.2, the Consultant will generate one (1) conceptual site alternative for Sunset Terrace in addition to the alternative already developed by Bumgardner. This alternative will incorporate circulation, open space and stormwater concepts as well as housing, RHA facilities and a "third place" and will be based on the concept in the CIS. The plan will be flexible to accommodate a range of third places. http://renton.civicweb.net/Documents/l^ocumentDisplay.aspx?Print=l&ID=3457 06/10/2010 5c. ‐ Community and Economic Development Department recommends approval of a contract in the amount of $630,000 with CH2M Hill for Page 22 of 179 CivicWeb: Scope of Work.docx Page 6 of 39 The Consultant will develop conceptual phasing scenarios for the one site alternative including the potential for infill housing and relocation. These scenarios, one draft and one final, will be based on the current understanding of funding sources and timelines. Task 2.1 Deliverables: • Draft and Final versions of up to one (1) conceptual site alternative for Sunset Terrace. • Draft and Final versions of conceptual phasing scenarios for the site alternative including the potential for infill housing and relocation. 2. Neighborhood 1. Subarea Definition - CITY Based on Task 1.1, the City will delineate subareas within the larger Sunset Planned Action study area for purposes of defining future land use and growth. The subarea definition may be based on a combination of factors to include changes in land use patterns, presence of public facilities, and transportation analysis zones. The Consultant will prepare one map identifying the planned action boundaries and sub-areas within it. Task 2.2.1 Deliverables: • Draft and Final versions of a map identifying the planned action boundaries and sub-areas within it. 2. Land Capacity - CITY The Consultant will prepare a land capacity analysis of the neighborhood using CITY buildable lands analysis assuming current zoning. Variations in development levels will be tested by identifying a range of discounts and densities that are within the range of zoning (e.g. outcomes assuming full build out versus other standards). This analysis will be prepared at a neighborhood and subarea level (consistent with Task 2.2.1) and will feed into the conceptual growth alternatives formulation in Task 2.2.3. The Consultant will summarize the methods in a memo and produce an Excel spreadsheet or table with the land capacity results. A draft and final spreadsheet will be prepared. Task 2.2.2 Deliverables: • A draft and final land capacity analysis spreadsheet will be prepared. 3. Conceptual Growth Alternatives - CITY The Consultant will define cumulative growth levels for the No Action and two Action Alternatives that will form the basis for quantitative analysis in the EIS. It is anticipated that the No Action Alternative will represent a lower bookend and one Action Alternative will represent an upper bookend. The second Action Alternative may consist of a moderate level of growth. The growth alternatives may test different assumptions in the same zones, e.g. more mixed use development patterns versus more single use development patterns. The conceptual growth alternatives will take into account prior Task 1 and 2 efforts. Task 2.2.3 Deliverables: • One draft memo describing conceptual growth alternatives and one final memo prior to the scoping process. http://renton.civicweb.net/Docirments/T3ocumentDisplay.aspx?Print=l&ID= 06/10/2010 5c. ‐ Community and Economic Development Department recommends approval of a contract in the amount of $630,000 with CH2M Hill for Page 23 of 179 Civic Web: Scope of Work.docx Page 7 of 39 3. Scoping and Public Outreach - JOINT 1. Scoping Document The Consultant will prepare a draft and final scoping document that provides a broad and brief record of the environmental topics proposed for inclusion in the NEPA/SEPA EIS and the basis for not including other topics in the EIS. This scoping document will address environmental topics in the SEPA Checklist and in HUD's NEPA Environmental Assessment format. Task 3.1 Deliverables: • Draft and Final versions of a NEPA/SEPA Scoping Document Notice 2. DS/Scoping Notice and Notice of Intent The Consultant will prepare a SEPA Determination of Significance (DS) and Scoping Notice that describes the intent for a Planned Action. The Consultant will prepare a separate NEPA Notice of Intent to prepare an EIS. Both notices will describe the proposed action, possible alternatives, and scoping meetings as well as the lead agency contact. The notices will be prepared and issued in accordance with WAC 197-11-408 and 24 CFR 58.55 (and 40 CFR parts 1500 through 1508). The Consultant will prepare one preliminary draft and one public draft version of each notice. The CITY will publish the SEPA DS notice in compliance with SEPA Rules. The Consultant will coordinate with appropriate HUD staff to publish the NEPA Notice of Intent in the Federal Register. The Consultant will also prepare a simple fact sheet or postcard that can be translated into multiple languages to advertise the scoping meetings to local households and businesses. The Consultant will prepare the postcard in English,and the City and/or RHA will provide translation services. The City will print and distribute the postcard. Task 3.2 Deliverables: • Draft and Final versions of a SEPA Determination of Significance (DS) and Scoping Notice that describes the intent for a Planned Action. • Draft and Final versions of a NEPA Notice of Intent to prepare an EIS. • Simple fact sheet or post card. Task 3.2 Assumptions: • The CITY will publish the DS/Scoping Notice. • The Consultant will coordinate with appropriate HUD staff to publish the NEPA Notice of Intent in the Federal Register. HUD is responsible for ensuring publication of NOI. • The Consultant will prepare the postcard in English and the City will provide translation services. The City will print and distribute the postcard. http://renton.civicweb.net/Documents/T3ocumentDisplay.aspx?Prinf=l&ID=3 06/10/2010 5c. ‐ Community and Economic Development Department recommends approval of a contract in the amount of $630,000 with CH2M Hill for Page 24 of 179 CivicWeb: Scope of Work.docx Page 8 of 39 3. Meeting A scoping meeting will be held with notification consistent with 24 CFR 58.56, 24 CFR 58.5, and 40 CFR 1506.6 as well as SEPA rules adopted by the CITY. The Consultant, together with the CITY and RHA, will hold one public meeting to solicit citizen and federal, state, and local agency input regarding the scope of the NEPA/SEPA EIS. The Consultant will prepare a presentation and be prepared to answer questions. Task 3.3 Deliverables: • One scoping meeting for the public and agencies. Task 3.3 Assumptions • The CITY and RHA will arrange one public/agency meeting during the scoping period. Up to four Consultant staff will attend. The Consultant will prepare a presentation and be prepared to answer questions. 4. Summary of Scoping Comments and Responses Following the completion of the scoping period, the Consultant will prepare a summary of public comments and responses, including how the scope or alternatives have been adjusted or retained. Due to the number of comments being unknown, the Consultant will perform up to the budgeted hours. The Consultant will prepare one preliminary draft and one final scoping summary. The final scoping summary will be included as an appendix to the EIS. Task 3.4 Deliverables: • One preliminary draft and one final scoping summary 4. Refine Alternatives and Technical Analysis 1. RHA Sites Alternatives - RHA Following scoping, the one conceptual alternative created in Task 2.1 will be refined. The second alternative, Bumgardner plan, will remain unchanged. The Consultant will develop architectural character imagery for the one alternative beyond the alternative established in the CIS. Task 4.1 Deliverables: • Draft and final architectural character imagery for one RHA site alternative. 2. Neighborhood - CITY Based on scoping input to the alternatives, the Consultant will revise the growth assumptions for the alternatives including the No Action and two Action Alternatives. http://renton.civicweb.net/Documents/^ 06/10/2010 5c. ‐ Community and Economic Development Department recommends approval of a contract in the amount of $630,000 with CH2M Hill for Page 25 of 179 Civic Web: Scope of Work.docx Page 9 of 39 3. Develop NEPA/SEPA Alternatives Description - JOINT Based on the scoping process, the Consultant will prepare a statement of purpose and need and an alternatives description including a review draft and a revised draft for inclusion in the preliminary draft EIS (PDEIS). These sections will meet the requirements of 40 CFR 1502.13 and 14. The statement of purpose and need will identify the reasons the CITY and RHA are proposing the alternatives including the proposed actions. The description of alternatives will describe the No Action Alternative and two Action Alternatives that are reasonable means of achieving the purpose and need. It will describe alternatives considered but not carried forward. Task 4.3 Deliverables • A statement of purpose and need and an alternatives description including a review draft and a revised draft for inclusion in the PDEIS. 5. NEPA/SEPA Documentation During EIS preparation, the Consultant will coordinate with the CITY, RHA and HUD. Please see Task 7 for consultation efforts. 1. Preliminary Draft EIS/EA Preparation and Review The combined NEPA/SEPA document will be prepared in compliance with state and federal rules (WAC 197-11, 24 CFR 58, and 40 CFR 1500 to 1508). The format of the document will be consistent with HUD and Council on Environmental Quality (CEQ) regulations (24 CFR 58.37(e) and 40 CFR 1502.10). The EIS will contain: (a) Cover sheet. (b) Summary. (c) Table of contents. (d) Purpose of and need for action. (e) Alternatives including proposed action. (f) Affected environment. (g) Environmental consequences including means of mitigation, (h) List of preparers. (i) List of Agencies, Organizations, and persons to whom copies of the statement are sent. (j) Index. (k) Appendices. Sub-sections of the EIS will address elements of the environment required by NEPA and SEPA as determined through the scoping process. At this time, it is anticipated that the elements of the environment to be analyzed in the EIS include: • Land Use • Housing • Socioeconomic • Environmental Justice • Transportation • Parks & Recreation • Public Services • Utilities • Water Resources • Aesthetics http ://renton.ci vie web.net/Documents/DocumentDisplay. aspx?Print= 1 &ID=3 457 06/10/2010 5c. ‐ Community and Economic Development Department recommends approval of a contract in the amount of $630,000 with CH2M Hill for Page 26 of 179 CivicWeb: Scope of Work.docx Page 10 of 39 • Noise • Air • Environmental Health • Historic/Cultural Resources • Earth • Plants and Animals • Energy For each environmental topic, the EIS will include two levels of review: site specific analysis related to Sunset Terrace and a neighborhood level planned action analysis. 1. General Sections - JOINT The Consultant will prepare general sections of the EIS including the Cover Sheet, Table of Contents, Summary, List of Preparers, and References. The Sections will be prepared consistent with federal and state requirements (40 CF 1502 and WAC 197-11-440). 2. Land Use - JOINT The Consultant will prepare a land use analysis for inclusion in the EIS including the following evaluations: • Land use compatibility including the proposed amount, types, scale and pattern of uses in comparison with the existing land use pattern and adjacent development. • Conformance with applicable federal, state, county, and local plans and regulations, such as the Renton Comprehensive Plans and Zoning/Development regulations. 3. Housing-JOINT Using available CITY, RHA- or SRI-prepared information, the Consultant will analyze current and future housing conditions in the Sunset Area, focusing on both public and private housing, including: • Number of housing units that would be provided and those potentially eliminated, with estimates of housing type (attached, detached, etc.) and affordability (extremely low, very low, low income, etc.). • Replacement and relocation: • Are replacement facilities or housing units available within the community or in nearby neighborhoods? • What will be the effect of relocation on these neighborhoods? 4. Socioeconomic-JOINT The Consultant will prepare a socioeconomics analysis that addresses the following demographic, employment, and displacement topics and questions related to Sunset Terrace and Sunset Area proposals: • Demographic Character Changes: • What are the identifiable communities that could be affected by RHA proposals and/or the planned action? • Will the proposals and alternatives significantly alter the demographic characteristics of the community? • Will the proposals and alternatives result in physical barriers or difficult access to local services, facilities, and institutions, or other parts of the city more difficult? • Will the proposals and alternatives adversely alter residential, commercial, or industrial uses? http://renton.civicweb.net/Documents/T)ocumentDisplay.aspx?Print=l&ID=3457 06/10/2010 5c. ‐ Community and Economic Development Department recommends approval of a contract in the amount of $630,000 with CH2M Hill for Page 27 of 179 Civic Web: Scope of Work.docx Page 11 of 39 • • • Will the proposals and alternatives adversely alter community institutions? Employment and Income Patterns: Will the proposals and alternatives either significantly increase or decrease employment opportunities? Will they create conditions favorable or unfavorable to commercial or institutional operation or development? How many temporary and how many permanent jobs will be created by the proposal and alternatives? What are the profiles of new jobs created by the proposal and alternatives? What is the distribution across the skills and income scale? How do these relate to the skills and income profile of study area residents? Will the new jobs likely go to area residents, to lower income, unemployed and minority group members? Where are the new employees likely to come from (i.e., in-City, outside City)? Displacement: Will the proposal or alternatives directly displace individuals or families? How many persons? Is the displacement covered by the Uniform Relocation Act and are funds available for payment? Will identifiable groups be affected - older persons, females, single-parent families, racial/ethnic or income groups, or minority group members? Will the project remove or relocate existing jobs, community facilities, or any business establishments? Is the displacement covered by the Uniform Relocation Act and are funds available for payments? Will the project result in probable indirect displacement (e.g. displacement caused by rapidly increasing rents made possible by revitalization)? If so, have measures been planned to alleviate the hardship on those affected whose displacement is not covered under the Uniform Relocation Act? 5. Environmental Justice - JOINT Executive Order 12898 - "Federal Actions to Address Environmental Justice in Minority Populations and Low- Income Populations," applies in low-income or minority neighborhoods where a HUD grantee proposes the acquisition of housing, the acquisition of land for development, and new construction. If Sunset Boulevard improvements are eligible for federal funding the requirement to assess environmental justice impacts will also apply through DOT Order 5610.2. The Consultant will assess the potential of the Sunset Area proposals and Sunset Area proposals (e.g. roadway) to have a disproportionately high and adverse human health or environmental effects on minority and low-income populations. If impacts are identified, mitigation or avoidance of adverse impacts from the project to the extent practicable will be developed. 6. Transportation - JOINT Based on the analysis completed in Task 10 Consultant will prepare a description of the affected environment, impacts of the proposed alternatives and mitigation measures related to transportation for inclusion in the Draft EIS. 7. Parks & Recreation - JOINT The Consultant will prepare a parks and recreation analysis for the EIS that addresses the following questions: http://renton.civicweb.net/Documents/DocumentDisplay.aspx?Print=l&ID:=3457 06/10/2010 5c. ‐ Community and Economic Development Department recommends approval of a contract in the amount of $630,000 with CH2M Hill for Page 28 of 179 Civic Web: Scope of Work.docx Page 12 of 39 • What amount and type of designated and informal parks and recreational program opportunities are in the immediate vicinity? Who are the operators of the facilities? What is the baseline of existing facility capacity and programs? • What is the proximity of parks and recreation facilities to current and future residents? • Who currently uses the facilities (youth, adults, seniors)? Who are anticipated to use the facilities based on population and demographic changes identified in Task 5.1.4? • Would the proposed project add or displace parks and recreational uses? • What demand for parks and recreation services would the Sunset Terrace and neighborhood growth alternatives create? Consistent with the community wide parks and recreation planning efforts, up to three level of service methods will be tested to determine different means of demand for facilities and services. These service standards may test proximity and/or demand for particular facilities (e.g. distance of population to different types of facilities, square feet of community center per 1,000 population or number of playfields per 1,000 population, or other units of measure). • How can the needs generated by the Sunset Terrace and Sunset Area proposals be met? What types of facilities/amenities might be needed? What opportunities are there in the Sunset Area to add parks and recreation facilities, or to address inter-agency agreements to optimize available facilities? 8. Public Services - JOINT The Consultant will address the proposals and alternatives and potential increases in demand for public services. The demand analysis will be based on population, housing, and employment estimates and service providers' adopted levels of service. Access including walking paths, bus routes, and roadway access to facilities will also be addressed. The following services will be addressed: • Public Safety (police, fire, and emergency medical services) • Educational Facilities (K-12 schools, early childhood education) • Health Care (e.g. regular and emergency dental and medical care) • Social Services (e.g. family counseling centers, day care centers; services for senior citizens and the handicapped; nutrition centers, meals on wheels; income maintenance and man power programs, etc.). 9. Utilities - JOINT Based on the technical analysis developed in Task 12 regarding drainage and infrastructure and the increased demand due to RHA and Sunset Area proposals, the Consultant will determine impacts and mitigation measures for the following services: • Wastewater • Stormwater • Water Supply • Telecommunication • Natural Gas, Power, Electrical Key questions to be addressed in the EIS include: http://renton.civicweb.net/Documents/T3ocumentDisplay.aspx?Print=l&ID=3457 06/10/2010 5c. ‐ Community and Economic Development Department recommends approval of a contract in the amount of $630,000 with CH2M Hill for Page 29 of 179 Civic Web: Scope of Work.docx Page 13 of 39 • Will existing or planned utility systems adequately service the proposal and alternatives? • As a result of the proposal and alternatives will the design capacity of these facilities be exceeded? • Will the proposal or alternatives be adversely affected by proximity to these facilities? • How can the facilities be upgraded, expanded, or modified to support the RHA and Sunset Area proposals? Based on the work products from Task 12 the Consultant will prepare: • Introductory paragraph(s) for the Utilities Element of the Draft EIS that describes the context, and approach as well as the meaning of direct and indirect impacts. • Description of the Affected Environment for each of the Utilities addressed in this section (water, sewer and telecommunications). • Description of the capital and operational impacts of the proposed RHA alternatives on each of the utility systems. • Description of the capital and operational impacts of the proposed neighborhood alternatives on each of the utility systems. • Description of proposed mitigation measures related to utility's systems for each of the RHA and Neighborhood alternatives. 10. Water Resources - JOINT The Consultant will assess current conditions and potential impacts regarding groundwater and surface water for the proposals and alternatives. The change in impervious surfaces and water quantity and quality will be assessed taking into account current surface water, drainage, and soils conditions, the proposed drainage master plan, and low impact development techniques. 11. Aesthetics-JOINT The Consultant will use existing photos, maps, aerials, and text to describe the overall aesthetic character of the RHA sites and planned action area. Site and neighborhood character will be described in terms of visual quality and coherence, character and design of existing buildings, and building height, bulk and scale. Using conceptual/site plans developed for the RHA proposals and other example developments indicative of zoning allowances, the Consultant will describe the degree and nature of changes due to the proposal and alternatives and potential effects on surrounding visual character, height and bulk, and shade/shadow. No photo montage or Sketch Up Modeling is assumed. 12. Noise-JOINT The Consultant will prepare a noise analysis for inclusion in the EIS addressing the following: • Given the existing ambient noise and estimated future noise levels of the Sunset Terrace, is the site appropriate for the proposed activities and facilities? What noise sources could affect future residents? • Will the Sunset Terrace and planned action area be exposed to noise levels which exceed federal, state or local noise standards? • If there is a potential adverse noise impact, what kinds of mitigation measures are proposed? How can http://renton.civicweb.net/Documents/T)ocumentDisplay.aspx?Print=l&ID=3457 06/10/2010 5c. ‐ Community and Economic Development Department recommends approval of a contract in the amount of $630,000 with CH2M Hill for Page 30 of 179 CivicWeb: Scope of Work.docx Page 14 of 39 codes and other mitigation reduce potential effects? The Consultant will describe the overall noise character of the study area based on existing uses and for Sunset Terrace based on noise monitoring. The Consultant will conduct 48-hour mid-week noise monitoring at one monitoring location (Sunset Terrace). As part of the noise monitoring the Consultant will conduct site visits to the Sunset Terrace site to identify site-specific noise sources such major roads, commercial facilities, and airports (addressing facilities within 15 miles). Consultant will review the FAA Part 150 Noise Compatibility Study for Renton Airport to evaluate how existing and future airport noise levels will affect the Sunset Terrace and the planned action area. Future noise will be determined based on U.S. Department of HUD Noise Assessment Guidelines and use of the traffic model volumes and other noise programs (e.g. TNM lookup tables). The Consultant will prepare a narrative that describes the existing ambient noise levels and potential increases in noise levels due to increases in traffic. Mitigation measures such as the energy code and other noise abatement practices will be described. 13. Air Quality/Greenhouse Gas - JOINT The Consultant will prepare an analysis of air quality and greenhouse gas emissions answering the following questions: • Would the proposal and alternatives result in additional air pollutant emissions? • How can RHA and neighborhood proposals and alternatives that focus on mixed uses reduce emissions compared with other development patterns? The Consultant will summarize existing air quality conditions and compare CITY and PSRC plans and growth levels and potential Vehicle Miles Traveled (VMT) by alternative based on the transportation model. Consultant will also prepare a focused review of greenhouse gas emissions as follows. • Use the King County greenhouse gas emissions worksheet to determine the potential for alternatives to reduce greenhouse gas emissions compared with dispersed development patterns. • Review worksheet assumptions regarding vehicle use in light of the EIS traffic analysis results and consider vehicles per dwelling unit, and VMT by square footage by category and determine if adjustments need to be made. • Evaluate potential GHG reduction measures as identified by King County. • Identify policy or code provisions that would serve as mitigation measures. 14. Environmental Health - JOINT For the planned action area, the Consultant will assess potential soils contamination in the study area based on contamination and cleanup data as available from the CITY, state and other readily available sources. Based on available information concerning historic land uses in the study area, the analysis will also identify the risk of potential contamination in the planned action area. For the Sunset Terrace sites, the Consultant will use as appropriate HUD Notice 79-33 and HUD guidebook, "Safety Considerations in Siting Housing Projects." The Consultant will conduct field observations to identify potential hazards. As appropriate, federal and state laws and specific mitigating measures will be identified to address potential contamination at the selected Sunset Terrace http://renton.civicweb.net/Docurnents/DocumentDisplay.aspx?Print=l&ID=3457 06/10/2010 5c. ‐ Community and Economic Development Department recommends approval of a contract in the amount of $630,000 with CH2M Hill for Page 31 of 179 Civic Web: Scope of Work.docx Page 15 of 39 sites and within the study area. 15. Historic/Cultural Resources - JOINT The Consultant will address potential effects to archaeological and historic resources if any are documented or found to be eligible. The cultural resources assessment will address existing conditions and potential future conditions based on the area redeveloping and complying with local, state, and Federal regulations. • Historic Resources: The Consultant will conduct a literature search for the planned action area and vicinity to identify the presence of any known historic resources. The Consultant will coordinate with RHA and City to notify the Washington Department of Archaeology and Historic Preservation (DAHP) and affected tribes by letter about the project and the pending cultural resources investigation, as necessary, and invite them to participate and contribute information to the project. The Consultant will then conduct a reconnaissance-level historic resources survey of built environment resources 45 years of age or older on Sunset Terrace (approximately 31 buildings) and along SR 900 (one parcel deep, approximately 18 buildings) [2]. The Consultant will inspect the integrity of these resources to evaluate their potential eligibility for listing in the National Register of Historic Places. The Consultant will collect information about their architectural character and physical integrity of each resource, including photographs, and prepare a Washington Historic Property Inventory form for each resource surveyed. • Archaeological Resources: The Consultant will conduct a literature search for the planned action area and vicinity to identify the presence of any known archaeological sites. The Consultant will coordinate with RHA and the City to notify the DAHP and affected tribes by letter about the project and the pending cultural resources investigation, as necessary, and invite them to participate and contribute information to the project. The Consultant will then conduct an archaeological survey limited to RHA project sites and SR 900 (not the entire Sunset project area) to identify previously recorded and/or unrecorded archaeological resources where ground-disturbing activities are expected to take place. The survey will be conducted using standard, industry-accepted methods that are appropriate for finding and recording cultural resources in the project area. Field reconnaissance will include inspection of the ground surface at 30 meter transects across the RHA project area to find exposed ground surface, any exposed cultural materials, and areas that have high probability for having buried deposits that could contain cultural materials. In areas where project-related ground-disturbance is expected, up to 12 shovel test pits (hand-dug holes no more than 30- 40 centimeters wide at the surface) will be excavated to reveal the nature of the subsurface deposits and whether or not buried cultural materials are present. If required, selected probes will be made along SR 900 in readily accessible landscaped areas to confirm the area's disturbance and likely lack of resources. All probes will be backfilled upon completion. Any newly identified archaeological sites will be mapped, photographed, and recorded on Washington State Archeological Inventory forms. The Consultant will prepare draft and final versions of a cultural resources technical report that summarizes the results of the both the archaeological survey and historic resources survey of the RHA sites, and the identification of known cultural resources in the planned action area. The report will analyze the project's potential impacts on identified cultural resources and offer recommendations for the management and/or mitigation of potential adverse effects. The report will meet state and federal standards for reporting as outlined in the guidelines provided by DAHP. 16. Earth-JOINT The Consultant will address earth including geologic conditions, slope, soils, and hazards found in the planned http://renton.civicweb.net/Documents/DocumentDisplay.aspx?Print=l&ID=3457 06/10/2010 5c. ‐ Community and Economic Development Department recommends approval of a contract in the amount of $630,000 with CH2M Hill for Page 32 of 179 CivicWeb: Scope of Work.docx Page 16 of 39 action area and RHA sites. • Planned Action Area: The geologic setting and simplified geologic character of the study area will be described in terms of the normal expected natural environment and the expected constructability and normal impacts of the constructed environment. The analysis will rely primarily on narrative description using soils reports from recent constructed projects - public (e.g. sewer line) and private. The degree and nature of potential soil/geotechnical impacts encouraged by the proposal and alternatives will be discussed. • Sunset Terrace: Based on the results of geologic reconnaissance conducted in Task 9.2, Consultant will prepare a description of the affected environment, impacts of the proposed alternatives and mitigation measures for inclusion in the EIS related to geology at Sunset Terrace. There will be a limited field surface assessment of the Sunset Terrace site. 17. Plants and Animals - JOINT The planned action area and Sunset Terrace are largely developed. The area lies near the Honey Creek Greenbelt and aquifer protection areas. It is likely that the primary topics to be addressed are water quality and runoff effects on adjacent natural systems. The Consultant will review available information and conduct limited site reconnaissance visits of the RHA sites. No habitat or wetland surveys or assessments will be conducted. The Consultant will prepare a technical report that: • Describes the existing conditions for wildlife habitat, habitat features, and potential use by Federal or State listed threatened, endangered, candidate, or priority species. The summary will be based on existing CITY inventories, WDFW Priority Habitat Species (PHS) maps, Washington Natural Heritage Program data and maps, and contacts with representatives from other agencies (Tribes, WDFW area habitat biologist, Washington Department of Ecology, and USFWS that may have wildlife information relative to the study area. • Describes application of federal state, and local regulations (e.g. critical areas) that apply. • Describes how growth and development may indirectly or directly affect plants and animals in the study area such as through stormwater runoff. The Consultant will assess the potential for proposed low impact development standards, regional drainage systems, and other features to minimize impacts. The Consultant will document findings in a biological evaluation. The Consultant assumes the conclusion for NEPA purposes will be a letter of no effect regarding federal listed species. 18. Energy-JOINT The Consultant will describe, at a site specific level for the Sunset Terrace site and at an areawide planned action level, energy sources and consumption, changes in demand for energy as a result of the proposal and alternatives, and mitigation measures to reduce demand such as energy code requirements, proximity to transit services, etc. The following questions will be addressed: • Sunset Terrace: • What energy is likely to be consumed directly by the proposed dwellings for heating, cooling, and for hot water systems, and secondly heating consumed indirectly or induced by the facility, consumed chiefly in http://renton.civicweb.net/Documents/DocumentDisplay.aspx?Print=l&ID=3457 06/10/2010 5c. ‐ Community and Economic Development Department recommends approval of a contract in the amount of $630,000 with CH2M Hill for Page 33 of 179 CivicWeb: Scope of Work.docx Page 17 of 39 the transportation of people and goods to and from the facility. • Does the location of the site have any special energy related advantages or disadvantages? Can these be maximized or overcome? • Have site plans taken full advantage of potential energy saving measures? • Planned Action Area as a whole: • Does the study area contain or lie in close proximity to transit, shopping, services, and employment locations? • What energy reduction measures are included in local, state, or federal energy codes, or applicable from green building design and greenhouse gas emission reductions, that could reduce energy consumption? The Consultant will evaluate energy consumption, and will evaluate potential energy reduction measures as follows: • Energy consumption calculations for Sunset Terrace. For the Sunset Terrace site, the Consultant will estimate site-wide energy usage by direct space heating, electricity usage, and vehicle usage. The Consultant will use the Energy Star Target Finder model to forecast baseline energy usage, natural gas consumption, electricity usage according to geographic area and facility type. The Consultant will calculate vehicle-related energy consumption by considering project-specific VMT forecasts, which are based on the facility's mixed-use land use goals. • Planned Action Area Energy Calculations. The Consultant will use the King County GHG spreadsheet to estimate energy usage. The Consultant will supplement the King County spreadsheet with estimates of vehicle-related fuel consumption. • Energy reduction measures. The Consultant will evaluate potential energy reductions achievable by using more stringent energy codes (e.g., the Seattle Energy Code) and by adopting LEED energy-conservation design goals. 19. GIS Maps and Graphics - JOINT The Consultant will prepare GIS maps and graphics to support the preparation of the EIS. The Cost Estimate assumes up to 9 maps or graphics for the Alternatives Description and up to 20 maps or graphics for the EIS. 20. Meeting to Obtain CITY/RHA Comments - JOINT The Consultant will prepare a Preliminary DEIS for CITY and RHA staff review. The Consultant will meet with the CITY and RHA to obtain comments. CITY and RHA staff will provide one set of consolidated comments to facilitate the Consultant's efforts to create the Draft EIS. Consultant's level of effort is based on one round of review. 2. Draft EIS - JOINT 1. Print Check Preparation Based on a compiled set of comments from the CITY and RHA, the Consultant will prepare a public DEIS. The Consultant will provide a print-check copy of the document to the CITY and RHA to confirm that the requested http://renton.civicweb.net/Documents/DocumentDisplay.aspx?Print=l&ID=3457 06/10/2010 5c. ‐ Community and Economic Development Department recommends approval of a contract in the amount of $630,000 with CH2M Hill for Page 34 of 179 CivicWeb: Scope of Work.docx Page 18 of 39 changes have been made. 2. DEIS Preparation, Duplication, Distribution Upon concurrence that the print check document is ready to be published, the Consultant will provide electronic files suitable for duplication as well as posting on the CITY's website. The CITY will print the DEIS and will be responsible for distribution of the DEIS based on a distribution list prepared by the Consultant. 3. Notice of Availability The Consultant will prepare a Notice of Availability consistent with SEPA Rules and a Federal Register notice in compliance with NEPA procedures as adopted by HUD. The CITY will publish the SEPA notice in compliance with CITY SEPA Rules. The Consultant will coordinate with appropriate HUD staff to publish the NEPA notice in the Federal Register. 4. DEIS Comment Period The CITY will provide comments received in groups during the comment period. The Consultant will support the CITY in reviewing public comments received during the 45-day public comment period. Consultant's level of effort is based on one round of review. 5. Meetings Public meetings and hearings will be held with notification consistent with 24 CF 58.56, 24 CF 58.5,9 and 40 CFR 1506.6 as well as SEPA rules adopted by the CITY. The Consultant, in partnership with the CITY and RHA, will hold a public hearing to obtain comments on the DEIS and the draft planned action ordinance. This meeting may be sponsored by the Planning Commission or City Council. 3. Final EIS-JOINT 1. Establish Preferred Alternative Based on comments obtained during the 45-day comment period the Consultant will work with the CITY and RHA to develop a preferred alternative. The Consultant will prepare review draft and final site concept plan for Sunset Terrace and one description and map of a conceptual growth alternative for the planned action area. One revision of neighborhood prototype development concepts will be made by the Consultant assuming one day's time of effort. 2. Preliminary Final EIS Contents and Preparation 1. Responses to Comments The Consultant will meet with the CITY and RHA to prioritize and assign responsibilities for responses to the comments as appropriate and in accordance with the approved budget. For the purposes of this scope and budget, it is assumed that the Consultant will respond to 25 unique comments. http://renton.civicweb.net/Documents/DocumentDisplay.aspx?Print=l&ID=3457 06/10/2010 5c. ‐ Community and Economic Development Department recommends approval of a contract in the amount of $630,000 with CH2M Hill for Page 35 of 179 CivicWeb: Scope of Work.docx Page 19 of 39 2. PDFEIS/EA Preparation The Consultant will prepare a Preliminary FEIS for CITY and RHA review and comment. The Final EIS will reproduce the DEIS analysis with corrections included as needed and include responses to comments. 3. Meeting to Obtain CITY/RHA Comments The Consultant will prepare a Preliminary FEIS for CITY staff review. The Consultant will meet with the CITY to obtain comments. CITY staff will provide one set of consolidated comments to facilitate the Consultant's efforts to create the public FEIS. Consultant's level of effort is based on one round of review. 4. Print Check Preparation Based on a compiled set of comments from reviewers, the Consultant will prepare a FEIS. The Consultant will provide a print-check copy of the document to confirm that the requested changes have been made. 5. FEIS Preparation, Duplication, Distribution Upon concurrence that the print check document is ready to be published, the Consultant will provide electronic files suitable for duplication as well as posting on the CITY's website. The City will print the FEIS and will be responsible for distribution of the FEIS based on a distribution list prepared by the Consultant. 6. Notice of Availability The Consultant will prepare a notice of availability consistent with SEPA Rules and a Federal Register notice in compliance with NEPA procedures as adopted by HUD. The CITY will publish the SEPA notice in compliance with CITY SEPA Rules. The Consultant will coordinate with appropriate HUD staff to publish the NEPA notice in the Federal Register. Task 5 Deliverables: • Preliminary DEIS • Print check copy of the public review DEIS document to confirm changes • Notice of availability and Federal Register notice of DEIS • One preferred alternative - Sunset Terrace and planned action neighborhood • Preliminary Final EIS • A print-check copy of the public review Final EIS • Notice of availability and Federal Register notice of FEIS • One public hearing Task 5 Assumptions: • The CITY will publish SEPA notices and the Consultant will coordinate with appropriate HUD staff to publish NEPA notices in the Federal Register. • The CITY will provide one set of consolidated comments on the PDEIS and PDFEIS. • The CITY will arrange the public hearing during the DEIS comment period. http://renton.civicweb.net/Documents/DocumentDisplay.aspx?Prinf=l&ID=3457 06/10/2010 5c. ‐ Community and Economic Development Department recommends approval of a contract in the amount of $630,000 with CH2M Hill for Page 36 of 179 CivicWeb: Scope of Work.docx Page 20 of 39 The Sunset Terrace site plans will be at a concept level, which would not require a detailed review of architectural plans for conformance with energy codes and HUD Minimum Property Standards. Consultant responses to comments assumed in the budget - 25 unique comments. 6. Complete NEPA Notices and SEPA Planned Action 1. NEPA Record of Decision and Environmental Review Record - RHA The Record of Decision (ROD) will be prepared simultaneously with the FEIS and will become final after 30 days from the publication of the FEIS. The ROD will explain the decision on the proposed action, factors considered in making the decision, alternatives considered and the environmentally preferred alternative, adopted mitigation measures and reasons why mitigation measures were not adopted, and a monitoring and enforcement program for mitigation measures adopted. The ROD will be made available to the public (such as by inclusion of the ROD in the Federal Register notice in Task 5.3.6). The consultant will prepare one preliminary, one revised draft, and one public copy of the ROD. As part of Task 6.1, the consultant will prepare the environmental review record which compiles environmental review documents, public notices and written determinations or environmental findings, decisionmaking and actions as well as source documents and relevant base data. 2. Notice of Intent to Request Release of Funds - RHA The Consultant will prepare a review draft and an agency draft Notice of Intent/Request for Release of Funds (NOI/RROF) and Certification (HUD form 7015.15) for review by the CITY and RHA. The NOI/RROF must be disseminated and/or published in the manner prescribed by 24 CFR 58.43 and 58.45 (see 24 CFR 58.70 to 58.77) before the certification is signed by the responsible entity (the CITY). 3. Planned Action Ordinance - CITY 1. Planned Action Ordinance In conjunction with the EIS process, the consultant will prepare the ordinance that designates the Planned Action. As outlined in WAC 197-11-168, the ordinance will address: • The type of project action; • Compliance with the criteria for a planned action; • Findings related to adequacy of the Planned Action EIS; and • Mitigating measures required to qualify future projects as planned actions. The Planned Action Ordinance (PAO) will be as specific as possible, indicating the specific thresholds and http://renton.civicweb.net/Documents/DocumentDisplay.aspx?Print=l&ID=3457 06/10/2010 5c. ‐ Community and Economic Development Department recommends approval of a contract in the amount of $630,000 with CH2M Hill for Page 37 of 179 CivicWeb: Scope of Work.docx Page 21 of 39 mitigating measures necessary for a project to qualify as a planned action. However, for flexibility, ranges of thresholds will be incorporated to the extent feasible. It is anticipated that a Draft Ordinance will be prepared and issued with the DEIS, and similarly a proposed Final Ordinance will be issued with the FEIS. 2. Public Hearing Support A public hearing or other opportunity for public comment is required for adoption of a planned action ordinance. The Consultant will present a report on the PAO and be available to respond to questions at one City Council study session and at one City Council public hearing (hearing to be same as DEIS hearing). The CITY will be responsible for public notice, meeting scheduling and meeting logistics. 3. Administrative Guidance In order to assist with implementation of the PAO and review of future proposed planned actions, the Consultant will develop a Planned Action Administrative Guidance Paper. This document will include (1) a statement of the specific criteria for qualification as a planned action; (2) identification of the form/checklist to be used by the CITY to evaluate proposed planned actions; (3) a flow chart of the decision-making and review process for proposed planned actions; (4) a list of the specific mitigating measures required pursuant to the planned action ordinance; and (5) a monitoring system to track mitigation and development under the planned action ordinance. Task 6 Assumptions: • Up to two Consultant staff will attend the Planned Action study session and hearing. Hearing is the same as the DEIS hearing in Task 5.2.5. Task 6 Deliverables: • Record of Decision, preliminary, revised, and public draft • Notice of Intent to Request Release of Funds, one preliminary and one agency review draft • Draft and Final Planned Action Ordinance • Planned Action Administrative Guidance 7. Agency & Stakeholder Coordination - JOINT 1. Strategic Advisor Consultations Beyond specific tasks identified in Tasks 1 through 6, at the request of the CITY and/or RHA, the Consultant will provide strategic advice up to the budgeted hours including: Federal, state, and local funding approaches HUD applications and programs NEPA/SEPA compliance Early childhood education http://renton.civicweb.ne1/Documents/DocumentDisplay.aspx?Print=l&ID=3457 06/10/2010 5c. ‐ Community and Economic Development Department recommends approval of a contract in the amount of $630,000 with CH2M Hill for Page 38 of 179 CivicWeb: Scope of Work.docx Page 22 of 39 • Climate change strategies The meetings will be held to assure consistency and to maximize the project's potential for success. Additional optional time for consultation is provided in optional task 13.9. 2. External Coordination: HUD, WSDOT, and Resource Agencies Consultant will meet with HUD (2 meetings), WSDOT (2 meetings), and resource agencies (e.g. historic resources up to hours budgeted) during the project to confirm schedule conformance and maximize the potential for the project's implementation. These are in addition to other specified meetings in the scope. 3. Position for Grant Funding - CITY 1. Agency Application Review The Consultant will cross reference the graphics and documentation with the requirements of the funding applications to streamline the deliverables process. The Consultant will review and adjust the timeline as needed. 2. Agency Meetings The Consultant will assist in determining and will attend necessary funding agency meetings up to the planned level of effort, to determine requirements and to confirm milestones. 3. Test Alternatives against Funding Criteria - JOINT The Consultant will review revised alternatives created in Tasks 4.1 and 4.2 for consistency with funding source criteria documented in Task 1. The Consultant will recommend whether alternatives should be adjusted to confirm a range of options that comply with criteria are tested in the EIS. The product of this task will be a checklist and a memo with recommendations. One preliminary draft and one final memo and checklist will be prepared. Task 7 Deliverables • Agency application review and modified schedule as needed up to hours budgeted • Alternative review with draft and final memo including checklist • Attendance at meetings specified up to hours budgeted 8. Project Management - JOINT 1. Internal Consultant Team Coordination (bi-weekly) The Consultant will organize and prepare summary records of bi-weekly consultant team meetings to confirm conformance to schedule and budget. http://renton.civicweb.neiyDocuments/T3ocumentDisplay.aspx?Print=l&ID=3457 06/10/2010 5c. ‐ Community and Economic Development Department recommends approval of a contract in the amount of $630,000 with CH2M Hill for Page 39 of 179 CivicWeb: Scope of Work.docx Page 23 of 39 2. Interdepartmental Team The Consultant will meet up to four times with the CITY and RHA staff as a whole and with City and RHA staff individually up to budgeted hours. The interdepartmental meetings are anticipated to occur during the time to prepare alternatives, after scoping to refine alternatives, to collect PDEIS comments and to develop a preferred alternative. 3. Schedule The Consultant will develop a project schedule with specific action dates to confirm that the Consultant staff and the City team maintain the desired schedule. In conjunction with the monthly activity report, the Project Manager and City staff will assess project progress and discuss actions necessary to confirm that the project remains on schedule and within budget. 4. Progress Reports, Contracts, Subcontracts, Billings, and Financial Management Consultant will prepare monthly progress reports to both the CITY and RHA to accompany invoices for professional services. Consultant will manage and oversee sub-consultant contracts and sub-consultant invoices. Consultant will track forecasted status at completion and will provide an earned value report upon request. Task 8 Deliverables • Attendance at meetings specified up to hours budgeted • Up to 10 Monthly Progress Reports and Invoices • Project Schedule and Updates • Earned Value Reports as Requested 9. Stormwater - CITY 1. Strategies and Coordination Meetings The Consultant will determine the appropriate and most effective storm water and drainage strategies; evaluate the opportunities and challenges of the existing systems; identify opportunities to make "green connections" by integrating stormwater conveyance systems in new and existing infrastructure that also serve as community amenities; and determine the financial strategies for implementation. The Consultant will determine existing conditions and goals for integrating stormwater facilities and low-impact- development features for the Sunset Area consistent with the CIS. Coordination with RHA and WSDOT will be required. http://renton.civicweb.net/Documents/DocumentDisplay.aspx ?Print=l&ID=3457 06/10/2010 5c. ‐ Community and Economic Development Department recommends approval of a contract in the amount of $630,000 with CH2M Hill for Page 40 of 179 CivicWeb: Scope of Work.docx Page 24 of 39 The Consultant will prepare a Design Criteria Memorandum that identifies design standards, criteria and guidance to be used as a basis for stormwater planning in the study area. Guidance included will relate to NPDES and city code compliance, support of redevelopment and integration into greenways and open space. The Consultant will coordinate with City counterparts regarding the development of the Drainage Master Plan consistent with the budgeted hours. Task 9.1 Deliverables: • Draft and Final versions of a brief Technical Memorandum summarizing stormwater management goals, requirements and criteria. 2. Geotechnical: Data Review At the outset of this task the CITY will compile and provide to consultant geologic data, reports and information from the Sunset neighborhood that is in their possession. This compilation is expected to include geotechnical reports prepare for land development projects in the possession of the Planning Department, reports and boring logs prepared for public works or other CITY projects, and/or other studies or reports prepared by or for the CITY. The Consultant will collect and review these CITY provided documents. CITY documents to review may include: • Geotechnical maps; • Well data; • Relevant reports and; • Explorations (e.g. soil borings, test pits) The Consultant will perform a limited field visit of no more than 4 hours to verify data and conclusions from the data collection. Results of the data collection will be analyzed to develop an infiltration feasibility and constraint map for the Sunset Area; identify hazard areas for infiltration (e.g. steep slopes), relative infiltration rates and other constraints relevant for LID. The data will also be evaluated for risks related to the CITY's Sole Source Aquifer and make recommendation for protection of the aquifer and compliance with federal and City requirements related to the aquifer. Task 9.2 Deliverables: • Infiltration feasibility and constraint map for the Sunset Area. Task 9.2 Assumptions: • Field visit will not exceed four hours. • No new explorations or field data will be collected under this effort. • One Consultant staff participant in the confirming field work 3. Stormwater System Data Review Consultant will meet once with key CITY and Consultant staff. The purpose of the meeting will be to familiarize http://renton.civicweb.net/Documents/DocumentDisplay.aspx?Print=l&ID=3457 06/10/2010 5c. ‐ Community and Economic Development Department recommends approval of a contract in the amount of $630,000 with CH2M Hill for Page 41 of 179 CivicWeb: Scope of Work.docx Page 25 of 39 the Consultant with: * current deficiencies in the Sunset Area drainage system, maintenance, and operations processes, standards and procedures; • watershed and subwatershed conditions and issues, soils and infiltration characteristics; • as-builts, system maps, prior studies and condition assessments relevant to the drainage master plan; • relevant CITY regulations and programs; • potential funding mechanisms for developing a subregional drainage system to support future development; • technical criteria such as stormwater flow control and water quality treatment design standards, sensitive area buffer requirements, inspection and maintenance criteria; groundwater and aquifer protection requirements; and • goals for low impact development and subregional stormwater management in the Sunset Area. The Consultant will identify potential gaps or deficiencies in available information and develop preliminary recommendations for addressing them. The CITY will compile relevant resources at the outset of this task in the possession of the CITY relating stormwater management in the Sunset study area. The Consultant will briefly review relevant CITY documents. CITY documents to review may include: • Existing studies or drainage plans; • Existing system maps and hydrologic/hydraulic models of the Sunset Area and downstream drainage system; • Drainage complaint records; • Flow monitoring data; and • Drainage system inspection and condition assessment records. The Consultant will perform a field visit to verify existing conditions within the Sunset Area. Task 9.3 Deliverables: • Written summary of results of meeting with CITY staff resource documents and information gaps identified in the workshop. Task 9.3 Assumptions: • Meeting with CITY staff will not exceed one half working day. • One Consultant Attendee at meeting with CITY. • Field visit will not exceed one working day. • CITY will provide all data (e.g. GIS shapefiles) in electronic format to the extent available. • One Consultant participant in field visit. 4. Funding Options http://renton.civicweb.net/Documents/DocumentDisplay.aspx?Print=l&ID=3457 06/10/2010 5c. ‐ Community and Economic Development Department recommends approval of a contract in the amount of $630,000 with CH2M Hill for Page 42 of 179 CivicWeb: Scope of Work.docx Page 26 of 39 The Consultant will research Ecology, LID and infrastructure funding options in support of Task 1.4. 5. Stormwater Mapping, Modeling, Options 1. Existing System Mapping The CITY is in the process of completing an updated inventory of the drainage system. This task assumes this information is available and accurate for planning purposes with the following exceptions. This task will involve confirming drainage basins and drainage patterns within the Sunset Area. Work will also include identifying and listing surface water problems. The Consultant will review drainage patterns, boundaries and flow directions using existing information, topographic mapping and other data available from the CITY. The Consultant will also perform up to one day of field investigations to confirm the accuracy of the available data. Any proposed changes will be submitted to the CITY for updates to the database. 2. Basin Runoff Modeling The Consultant will summarize land cover and subcatchment statistics based on the developed system map and currently zoning to develop a runoff model for estimate volumes for subregional flow control necessary. Modeling will be conducted using the King County Runoff Time Series (KCRTS) model. No flow routing will be conducted at this stage of the project. 3. Develop Palette of Options for Green Stormwater Infrastructure The Consultant will develop a summary of green stormwater infrastructure (AKA low impact development) practices suitable for site conditions in the Sunset Area (e.g. soils, slopes, setbacks) and CITY code requirements for a range of land uses within the Planned Action area. Land uses include: • Schools, Libraries and Parks; • Parcel based developments; • Neighborhood streets; • Arterials and SR 900 and; • Sunset Terrace The Consultant will meet with key CITY to review and refine green stormwater infrastructure options for further consideration. The meeting will also facilitate identification of key implications for strategies to various Planned Action scenarios. 4. Develop Palette of Options for Subregional Stormwater Facilities The Consultant will coordinate with the CITY to further identify and refine locations for subregional stormwater facilities within the Sunset Area. Using the regional runoff model developed in Task 9.5.2, the Consultant will develop a preliminary volume required to achieve flow control objectives for a range of redevelopment levels. Task 9.5 Deliverables: http://renton.civicweb.net/Documents/DocumentDisplay.aspx?Print=l&ID=3457 ' 06/10/2010 5c. ‐ Community and Economic Development Department recommends approval of a contract in the amount of $630,000 with CH2M Hill for Page 43 of 179 CivicWeb: Scope of Wortdocx Page 27 of 39 • Verification of drainage system shape files consistent with the CITY's GIS. • Tabulation and summarization of identified surface water problems. • KCRTS Model of Sunset Area reflecting existing conditions, predevelopment target conditions and buildout conditions with required detention volumes. • Technical Memorandum describing potential locations and size for subregional stormwater facilities. TM will include brief summary of constraints, stakeholders and goals for co-location of facilities. • Technical Memorandum describing GI/LID practices for the site conditions and land uses in the Planned Action scenarios. Technical memorandum would describe the practices, identify constraints for locating facilities, preliminary sizing information and examples. Task 9.5 Assumptions: • Field visit will not exceed one working day. • Workshop will not exceed one half working day. • KCRTS modeling will not include flow routing. Development of a system-wide hydraulic model, if necessary, will be scoped separately. • Land use, impervious coverage and/or zoning information is available and adequate for estimating hydrology. No additional impervious or land cover delineation will be conducted. • No new analysis will be conducted to identify surface water problems. • GI/LID Technical Memorandum will not exceed 5 pages in the length. • Technical Memorandum on potential subregional facilities will not exceed 3 pages in length. • One Consultant Attendee on the field visit and at the meeting with CITY staff. 6. Refine Stormwater Drainage Options 1. Refine Palette of Options from Scoping The Consultant will review public comments from the Scoping and Public Outreach tasks and revise the palette of green infrastructure and regional solutions to reflect the results of the scoping and continued development of the Planned Action scenarios. 2. Develop Options for Integrated Subregional Facility and On-site LID Strategies The Consultant will work with CITY staff to develop a range of options balancing subregional facility construction with on-site LID strategies to optimize stormwater management with encouraging redevelopment in support of the Planned Action scenarios. 7. Technical Analysis: Master Drainage Plan 1. Model and Evaluate Alternatives http://renton.civicweb.net/Documents/DocumentDisplay.aspx?Print=l &ID=3457 06/10/2010 5c. ‐ Community and Economic Development Department recommends approval of a contract in the amount of $630,000 with CH2M Hill for Page 44 of 179 CivicWeb: Scope of Work.docx Page 28 of 39 The Consultant will model the integrated stormwater strategies to refine estimates of on-site water quality and flow control achievable and required downstream subregional facility sizes necessary to meet Renton stormwater code. Consultant will review the results of the modeling with the CITY to evaluate alternatives and select the preferred alternative. 2. Develop a Prioritized Infrastructure Improvements List The hydrologic model results will be used to evaluate system capacity improvements necessary to convey runoff from site improvements to the planned subregional facilities. The Consultant will work with the CITY and results of the market analysis to develop a prioritized list of improvements to be constructed and under what build-out conditions improvements will be needed. Planning level cost estimates for the infrastructure improvements will be prepared (e.g. using King County Tabula or other estimation methods). 3. Conceptual Design of Subregional Facilities The Consultant will develop conceptual designs of the subregional facilities to support the environmental analysis and documentation process for the Planned Action EIS. Planning level cost estimates for the subregional facilities will be prepared (e.g. using King County Tabula or other estimation methods). Task 9.7 Deliverables: • KCRTS Model of Sunset Area reflecting alternative mixes of LID/GI with subregional facilities. • Prioritized Infrastructure Improvements List • Conceptual Drawings of Subregional Facilities. • Planning level cost estimates. Task 9.7 Assumptions: • KCRTS model may be supplemented with Western Washington Hydrology Model (WWHM) where appropriate and per approved methods to improve simulation of LID strategies. • Conceptual drawings will include 1 sheet per facility, depicting site footprint, critical structures and conceptual sections. • Alternative evaluation meeting will not exceed one half day and will have up to two Consultant attendees. 10. Sunset Boulevard - CITY 1. Strategies and Coordination Meetings The Consultant will determine existing conditions and goals for creating a pedestrian focused boulevard consistent with the CIS. The primary focus is between Edmonds and Monroe Avenues. Coordination with http://renton.civicweb.net/T3ocuments/T)ocumentDisplay.aspx?Print=l&ID=3457 06/10/2010 5c. ‐ Community and Economic Development Department recommends approval of a contract in the amount of $630,000 with CH2M Hill for Page 45 of 179 CivicWeb: Scope of Work.docx Page 29 of 39 WSDOT will be required. The Consultant will prepare a Design Criteria Memorandum that identifies design standards, criteria and guidance to be used for the Sunset Boulevard improvements. Guidance included will relate to roadway geometries and access, transit, bikes, and aesthetics. Existing transit stops, bus routes, school bus use, pedestrian corridors and linkages, and designated bike routes will be identified. The Consultant will coordinate with City counterparts regarding the development of the Sunset Boulevard design efforts consistent with the budgeted hours. Task 10.1 Deliverables: • Draft and Final versions of a brief Technical Memorandum summarizing Sunset Boulevard improvement goals, design guidance and criteria. 2. Traffic Data The Consultant will collect available data including volumes vehicle classifications, transit service, accidents (three most current years) from the CITY and other agencies (WSDOT). The Consultant will conduct new traffic turning movement counts at up to 12 intersections (signalized and un-signalized). Task 10.2 Deliverables • Data collection request memo and summarized data 3. Traffic Modeling The Consultant will perform traffic analysis for use in determining design parameters and potential traffic related environmental impacts. The following efforts will be performed by the Consultant: • Methods & Assumptions - Develop a methods and assumptions memorandum to capture analysis techniques, methods and assumptions for evaluation of alternatives, travel demand forecasting and operational analysis. Collaborate with CITY (and WSDOT) to agree on analysis methods including concurrency and impact analysis thresholds. • Sketch Tools/Modeling to support alternative land use options - Develop and implement sketch tools including spreadsheet Trip Gen tables to evaluate and assess the effects of various land uses within the project boundaries. • Travel Demand Forecasting 2010 through 2040 - utilizing PSRC model data banks from Vision 2040 including 2010, and 2020 and 2040), interpolate land uses and aggregate to the City of Renton TAZ zones to create 2020 and 2040 travel demand models. Develop travel demand model databanks for existing, 2020 and 2040 land use, create intersection and link demand volumes using Emme software. • Traffic Operational analysis. Develop a no build (existing land use plan) and a proposed land use[3] for AM and PM peak periods for up to 12 intersections and for the following scenarios: • Existing • 2015 No Action • 2015 Action http://renton.civicweb.net/Documents/DocumentDisplay.aspx?Print=l&ID=3457 06/10/2010 5c. ‐ Community and Economic Development Department recommends approval of a contract in the amount of $630,000 with CH2M Hill for Page 46 of 179 CivicWeb: Scope of Work.docx Page 30 of 39 • 2030 No Action and • 2030 Action • Analysis will include an assessment of safety (accidents), transit, non-motorized modes, and operational analysis. Data will be developed to support air and noise analysis described in Task 5. • Documentation - prepare a Transportation technical memo to support environmental documentation for no action and action scenarios including comparative graphics and tables. Task 10.3 Deliverables: • Draft and Final Methods and Assumptions memo. • Trip Generation Spreadsheets. • Traffic Demand Forecasting Model output files. • Traffic Operational analysis files and comparative tables for 12 scenarios. • Draft and final Transportation technical memo and summary for inclusion in EIS. Task 10.3 Assumptions: M CITY to provide current model data banks for EMME and Synchro (their most recent versions). • Photo Log field visit will not exceed one working day. • One Consultant Attendees at traffic meeting and field work. • CITY to provide most recent traffic counts. • Consultant will utilize sketch tools (either demand model or spreadsheet tables) to evaluate up to 6 land use options for a single horizon year. • Consultant will analyze up to 12 intersections for up to 2 peak hours, for up to the following five scenarios: • Existing (2010) . 2015 No Build, • 2015 Build • 2030 No Build and • 2030 Build • Consultant will collect 24 hour vehicle classification counts and intersections TM counts. • Traffic data will be prepared to support Air Quality and Noise studies. • A transportation technical memo will be developed to support environmental documentation. 4. Existing Conditions Documentation and Photo Log The Consultant will walk the project site and take digital photographs, log and index photos. Photos will include selected property frontages impacted by the project and along the Sunset Boulevard every 100 feet. Task 10.4 Deliverables http://renton.civicweb.net/Documents/DocumentDisplay.aspx?Print=l&ID==3457 06/10/2010 5c. ‐ Community and Economic Development Department recommends approval of a contract in the amount of $630,000 with CH2M Hill for Page 47 of 179 CivicWeb: Scope of Work.docx Page 31 of 39 Existing conditions photo log HTML format 5. Base Mapping The CITY will provide aerial photography and GIS database layers for the project area. The GIS layers include right of way, utilities, and buildings. The Consultant will develop project CAD files from the GIS data provided by the CITY for use in the development of design alternatives. The Consultant will develop an existing digital terrain model for use in evaluating vertical elevation impacts based on contours provided by the CITY. 6. Sunset Boulevard Alternatives and Scoping The Consultant will develop a range of alternatives to review during scoping of the EIS. The Consultant will develop up to 5 cross sections for SR900. Preliminary horizontal alignment and channelization will be prepared for up to three (3) design alignments. These preliminary design alignments will be reviewed by the CITY and used in scoping meetings identified in Task 3. To support the analysis and screening process the Consultant will reproduce landscape/urban design concepts developed in the Urban Design Concept Plan for Sunset Boulevard Landscape/urban design concepts to be reconfirmed are: • Full-Width Landscape Median Concepts • Narrow Landscape Median Design Concepts • Streetscape Urban Design Options for special paving, site furnishings, pedestrians, lighting, plant material, etc. • Street Tree Landscape Plan • Intersection Landscaping concept • Property Interface Landscape • Stormwater Design Concepts Task 10.6 Deliverables: • Landscape/urban design presentation graphics with one (1) revision based on comments received from the CITY. • Technical Memorandum describing stormwater requirements for SR900 with one (1) revision based on comments received from the CITY. • Cross section layouts (5) • Footprint layouts 1"=40' roll plots (3) 7. Sunset Boulevard Alternative Refinements From input received in Task 3, scoping, and based on direction from the CITY, the Consultant will refine the Sunset Boulevard improvement alternatives. http://renton.civicweb.net/Documents/T3ocumentDisplay.aspx?Print=l&ID=3457 06/10/2010 5c. ‐ Community and Economic Development Department recommends approval of a contract in the amount of $630,000 with CH2M Hill for Page 48 of 179 CivicWeb: Scope of Work.docx Page 32 of 39 8. Sunset Boulevard Technical Analysis The Consultant will refine Sunset Boulevard plans to further develop urban design features, enhance safety, incorporate street trees and median plantings, and incorporate sfreetscape elements. The Consultant will prepare a plan for approval of channelization plans and deviations and consult with WSDOT as appropriate. 9. Sunset Boulevard Opinion of Cost The CONSULTANT will estimate preliminary quantities and prepare a planning level opinion of cost for one (1) preliminary preferred alternative. The opinion of cost will be prepared using a 30 percent contingency factor. Task 10.9 Deliverables • Preliminary preferred alternative Opinion of Cost 11. Parks-JOINT There are three tasks associated with parks that are integrated in other tasks as follows: • Coordination with Citywide parks recreation and open space plan consultant: two meetings Task 8.2. • Development of concepts for integrated drainage and recreation facilities: part of Task 9.5.3 and 9.5.4. • Testing of level of service options and demand for parks and recreation facilities: part of Task 5.1.7. 12. Utilities - JOINT 1. Water and Sewer: Strategies and Coordination The Consultant will determine the appropriate and most effective water and sewer strategies within the goals of the Neighborhood Framework; evaluate the opportunities and challenges of the existing systems; and determine the financial strategies for implementation. Using data collected in Task 1.3 the Consultant will review and identify key limiting factors for the Planned Action area related to Water Service and Sewer Service. The Consultant will prepare a brief summary memo with a simple supporting graphic summarizing water and sewer service limiting factors. The Consultant will coordinate with City counterparts regarding water and sewer system modeling consistent with the budgeted hours. Tasks Task 12.1 Deliverables: • Draft and Final versions of a brief Technical Memorandum summarizing opportunities, issues and limiting factors related to the CITY water and sewer systems. http ://renton. civicweb .net/Documents/DocumentDisplay. aspx?Print= 1 &ID=3 457 06/10/2010 5c. ‐ Community and Economic Development Department recommends approval of a contract in the amount of $630,000 with CH2M Hill for Page 49 of 179 CivicWeb: Scope of Work.docx Page 33 of 39 2. Water System Model The CITY will provide complete GIS mapping of the water system along with a functioning hydraulic model. The Consultant will meet with CITY water utility staff once to review the database and obtain a working understanding of the water system serving the project area. Using data obtained from the GIS mapping, hydraulic model and consultation with CITY, the Consultant will prepare a brief memorandum summarizing the overall function, condition and capacity of the water system serving the project area. Task 12.2 Deliverables: • Draft and Final versions of a brief Technical Memorandum summarizing the overall function, condition and capacity of the water system serving the project area. 3. Sewer System Model The CITY will provide an up to date GIS mapping of the sewer system. The Consultant will provide various development options for potential development to the City wastewater utility staff to run through the City's hydraulic model and provide the results to the Consultant. Using data obtained from the GIS mapping, hydraulic model, and consultation with CITY, consultant will prepare a brief memorandum summarizing the overall function, condition and capacity of the sewer system serving the project area. Task 12.3 Deliverables: • Draft and Final versions of a brief Technical Memorandum summarizing the overall function, condition and capacity of the sewer system serving the project area. 4. Technical Analysis: Infrastructure Improvements 1. Sewer Using the alternatives developed in Tasks 4.1 and 4.2, the CITY will model the effects of proposed Sunset Terrace Alternatives and proposed Neighborhood alternatives (2 alternatives) in the CITY's sewer system hydraulic model that was obtained in Task 1.3. The Consultant will review the initial results of this modeling with CITY to confirm assumptions and results. The Consultant will prepare a brief memorandum with up to 6 accompanying graphics summarizing and illustrating the sewer improvement requirements for each alternative. 2. Water Using the alternatives developed in Tasks 4.1 and 4.2, consultant will model the effects of proposed Sunset Terrace Alternatives and proposed Neighborhood alternatives (2 alternatives) in the CITY's water system hydraulic model that was obtained in Task 1.3. Consultant will review the initial results of this modeling with CITY to confirm assumptions and results. Consultant will prepare a brief memorandum with up to 6 accompanying graphics summarizing and illustrating the water improvement requirements for each alternative. 3. Telecommunication Consultant will collect information from city franchised telecommunication utilities (Qwest and Comcast) and http://renton.civicweb.net/Documents/DocumentDisplay.aspx?Print=l&ID=3457 06/10/2010 5c. ‐ Community and Economic Development Department recommends approval of a contract in the amount of $630,000 with CH2M Hill for Page 50 of 179 CivicWeb: Scope of Work.docx Page 34 of 39 develop a qualitative assessment of the effects of proposed Sunset Terrace Alternatives and proposed Neighborhood alternatives (2 alternatives) on those systems. Consultant will review the initial results of this assessment with CITY and utility representatives (if possible) to confirm assumptions and results. Consultant will prepare a brief memorandum with up to 3 accompanying graphics summarizing and illustrating the results of this analysis. 13. Optional Tasks At the City's or RHA's request, the following tasks may be added to the scope of services based on written authorization and mutual agreement with the Consultant. 1. Renton Housing Authority Evaluation and Conditions Assessment - RHA 1. Evaluation and Conditions Assessment Working with RHA staff, the Consultant will meet visit inspect and evaluate existing housing at the Sunset Terrace site. The visual condition assessment will document the general structural condition of Sunset Terrace along with an estimation of the nature and general cost of improvements needed to bring the Sunset Terrace project into compliance with current International Building Code (IBC) requirements. Using data obtained from this visual assessment, consultant will prepare a brief memorandum summarizing retrofits required to address correcting Sunset Terrace aging infrastructure. 2. Redevelopment Strategy As requested by RHA, the Consultant is able to provide more in depth redevelopment strategies beyond the level of effort in Task 2.1. The Consultant will assist the RHA and SRI in determining the strategies and goals for redevelopment of Sunset Terrace. Consultant will also review the necessary processes as required for targeted funding sources to streamline efforts and maximize deliverables content and formatting. Task 13.1 Deliverables: • Draft and Final versions of a brief Technical Memorandum summarizing retrofits required to address correcting Sunset Terrace aging infrastructure • Draft and Final versions of a brief Memorandum outlining strategies and goals for redevelopment of Sunset Terrace. 2. Community Questionnaire (optional) - JOINT If determined to be an appropriate public involvement strategy in Task 1.4.3, the Consultant will prepare a questionnaire of up to 10 questions in English and in two additional languages. No more than two questions will be open ended. The Consultant will prepare one preliminary draft and one public questionnaire. The questionnaire form will be prepared for mailing and allow for citizens to return results with prepaid postage and through a website response. The Consultant will tabulate results. This scope covers tabulation of up to 100 returns. The http://renton.civicweb.net/Documents/DocumentDisplay.aspx?Print=l&ID=3457 06/10/2010 5c. ‐ Community and Economic Development Department recommends approval of a contract in the amount of $630,000 with CH2M Hill for Page 51 of 179 CivicWeb: Scope of Work.docx Page 35 of 39 Consultant will prepare one preliminary draft and one draft summary of the questionnaire results, which will become part of the scoping summary. Task 13.2 Deliverables: • One preliminary draft and final version of a public questionnaire. • One preliminary draft and final summary of the questionnaire results Task 13.2 Assumptions: • The community questionnaire will contain no more than 10 questions in English and in two additional languages. 3. Market Analysis - JOINT The Consultant's approach to market analysis integrates GIS data with macro and micro economic data to create comprehensive predictive tools. The Consultant believes that the market analyses must examine the current and future market trends that will drive the project economics; not solely regurgitate past market performance. For this project, the market analyses will provide the factual base for quantifying the inputs to the financial model. The process of analyzing market data also enables the Consultant to evaluate how the different types of desirable residential and retail uses may add value to each other when combined on the site. 1. General Analysis Methodology The Consultant will: • Review of existing and planned inventory by product type, year built and location. • Identify comparable regional projects to define competitive positioning of Sunset Neighborhood. • Estimate future demand based on the regional growth. • Balance existing and proposed supply with estimated future demand to estimate supportable development. • Estimate land values based on available sales comparable data. 2. Residential The following elements will be examined by the Consultant: • Housing Types • Large and small lot detached single-family. • Attached/townhouse • Stacked flat condominiums. • Stacked flat apartments • Supply and Demand Analysis: Regional, CITY, Submarket • Vacant/underutilized land supply by proposed zoning type. • Proposed and approved plats and permits. http://renton.civicweb.net/Documents/DocumentDisplay.aspx?Print=l &ID=3457 06/10/2010 5c. ‐ Community and Economic Development Department recommends approval of a contract in the amount of $630,000 with CH2M Hill for Page 52 of 179 CivicWeb: Scope of Work.docx Page 36 of 39 • Projected population and employment growth. • Absorption and occupancy trends. • Pricing • Rental rate and sale price trends. • Household income and employment projections. • Regional competitiveness 3. Retail The following elements will be examined by the Consultant: • Analysis Objectives • Assess retail market conditions for retail and services in the Sunset Area neighborhood; • Estimate local retail absorption and leakage rates; • Estimate how planned residential development will impact the retail market in terms of sales and retail mix; • Supply and Demand Analysis: Regional, CITY, Submarket • Vacant/underutilized land supply by commercial zoning type. • Proposed and approved projects. • Projected population and employment growth. • Existing retail establishments • Current and projected consumer expenditures • Retail leakage/competitive positioning. • Absorption and occupancy trends. • Pricing • Rental rate and commercial land sale data. Task 13.3 Deliverables: • Draft and Final versions of a Market Analysis Report describing expected markets for residential and retail development for the Sunset Area 4. Prototype Developments - CITY The Consultant will prepare up to 5 conceptual site layout and perspectives by zoning district - two for the Center Village District (with different levels and mixes of uses), one for the RM-F district, one for the R-10 district, and one for the R-14 district. Prototypes will broadly define what future development could look like under the alternatives on theoretical sites. The Consultant will prepare one draft and one final set of prototypes for use in the scoping process. http://renton.civicweb.net/Documents/DocumentDisplay.aspx?Print=l&ID=3457 06/10/2010 5c. ‐ Community and Economic Development Department recommends approval of a contract in the amount of $630,000 with CH2M Hill for Page 53 of 179 CivicWeb: Scope of Work.docx Page 37 of 39 Task 13.4 Deliverables: • One draft and one final set of prototypes for use in the scoping process. 5. Refine Prototype Developments - CITY The Consultant will revise the 5 conceptual site layout and perspectives by zoning district prepared in Task 13.4. The Consultant assumes revisions will require no more than one day to perform. 6. Prototype Residential Financial Analysis - CITY The prototype testing process is highly iterative between City Staff and the Consultant team. The goal of this task is twofold (1) Illustrate the range of residential concepts being considered and (2) identify physical, regulatory and market based obstacles to future development. The process for creating and testing prototype residential types is as follows: 1. Prototype Definition The Consultant will generate alternative development scenarios that are informed by the findings from Task 1. 2. Static Financial Analysis Based on the prototype housing products being considered, the Consultant will create a financial modeling tool to compare the relative strengths of each of concept and test hypothetical project level economics to help further refine the vision for neighborhood development. 3. Prototype Refinement Based on the outcome of above tasks, the Consultant will refine the prototype housing concepts and identify how the project level economics may shape the long-term redevelopment of the neighborhood. Task 13.6 Deliverables: Draft and final versions of prototype housing concepts with a description of how project level economics may shape the long-term redevelopment of the Sunset Area. 7. Air Quality Hot Spot Analysis - JOINT The Consultant will review available studies such as those prepared for 1-405 improvements considering existing conditions, future growth, and hot-spot modeling. As needed, use Washington State Department of Transportation's WASIST hot-spot model to estimate carbon monoxide concentrations at up to two intersections. The Consultant will contact PSRC to confirm the road improvement projects in the study area are included in the Regional Transportation Plan or the Transportation Improvement Plan. The Consultant will review PSRC's most recent Conformity Analysis for the regional plan to confirm it satisfies the federal requirements. The Consultant will incorporate the Federal Highway Administration's mandated template for mobile source air toxics. http://renton.civicweb.net/Documents/DocumentDisplay.aspx?Print=l&ID=3457 06/10/2010 5c. ‐ Community and Economic Development Department recommends approval of a contract in the amount of $630,000 with CH2M Hill for Page 54 of 179 CivicWeb: Scope of Work.docx Page 38 of 39 General Assumptions The scope assumes that the overall project will be completed in about ten months with an estimated start date of June 21, 2010. Project Management and Administrative budgets are based on this 10 month duration. It is assumed that the CONSULTANT will not perform any work in support of Environmental Site Assessments or Property Transfer Site Assessments in support of this project. The fee estimate accompanying this scope does not bind Consultant by the estimated fee for each individual task. The tasks will be completed within the total fee estimate for the overall project., and the total contract budget will not be exceeded. The CITY and RHA will timely provide available necessary government documents, studies, site plans, GIS data layers and mapping and other technical information pertaining to the study area, including any appropriate electronic GIS data, aerial photos, and drawings of areas within the project study area in a timely fashion. Consultant may reasonably rely upon the accuracy, timeliness, and completeness of the information / data provided by the CITY. Research and data collection used for the EIS will be based on readily available secondary sources of information, including reports, inventories, maps and other similar literature from local government and other sources. Only the site visits specifically identified in this scope will be performed. The Consultant will be responsible for document reproduction up to the budgeted amount. The CITY will be responsible for distribution of the Draft and Final EIS. All Consultant deliverables will include electronic file transfers to the CITY including PDF and native file formats (e.g. Word, Publisher). The CITY will consolidate all internal staff review comments from the CITY and RHA on draft review documents and provide a single, complete set of comments to the Consultant Team for revisions. CITY and RHA review and comment on draft documents will occur in accordance with the project schedule. The Consultant Team will not be responsible for delays in the schedule resulting from delays in the provision of critical information or in decision-making by City staff, elected or appointed boards, commissions or citizen groups. The CITY is not responsible for delays if materials have not been received from the Consultant Team in accordance with the project schedule. The CITY is responsible for web site content displaying EIS materials. CITY and RHA staff will be responsible for distribution of meeting notices, room arrangements and other logistics for public meetings. Audio recording or verbatim court reporting services for meetings are not included in this scope. CITY is responsible for meeting minutes of the Planning Commission and City Council. The Consultant will summarize public workshop and open house meetings. In providing opinions of cost, financial analyses, economic feasibility projections, and schedules for the PROJECT, Consultant has no control over cost or price of labor and materials; unknown or latent conditions of existing equipment or structures that may affect operation or maintenance costs; competitive bidding procedures and market conditions; time or quality of performance by operating personnel or third http://renton.civicweb.net/Documents/DocumentDisplay.aspx?Print=l&ID=3457 06/10/2010 5c. ‐ Community and Economic Development Department recommends approval of a contract in the amount of $630,000 with CH2M Hill for Page 55 of 179 CivicWeb: Scope of Work.docx Page 39 of 39 parties; and other economic and operational factors that may materially affect the ultimate PROJECT cost or schedule. Therefore, Consultant makes no warranty that CITY's actual PROJECT costs, financial aspects, economic feasibility, or schedules will not vary from Consultant's opinions, analyses, projections, or estimates. If CITY wishes greater assurance as to any element of PROJECT cost, feasibility, or schedule, CITY will employ an independent cost estimator, contractor, or other appropriate advisor. The EIS scope will be based on the outcome of Task 3 Scoping. To the extent that scoping identifies unforeseen topics or differences in levels of effort, the CITY, RHA and Consultant will negotiate a mutually acceptable scope and budget for the additional items. fJLl The environmental review of SR 900 improvements is intended to help develop the purpose and need for the project and to create environmental analysis that the City can later fold into appropriate project level NEPA analysis (at this time thought to be a documented categorical exclusion), [2] Analysis timeframe (45 years) is intended to allow the life of the report to be five years. If Sunset Boulevard will not be completed in that timeframe, the scope may require adjustment. [3] The Consultant will work with the City to define the future land use alternative to be tested, likely the most intensive compared to current land use plans. http://renton.civicweb.net/Documents/DocumentDisplay.aspx?Print=l&ID=3457 06/10/2010 5c. ‐ Community and Economic Development Department recommends approval of a contract in the amount of $630,000 with CH2M Hill for Page 56 of 179 CITY OF RENTON COUNCIL AGENDA BILL Subject/Title: 2011-2016 Six-Year Transportation Improvement Program (TIP) and Arterial Street Plan Update Meeting: Regular Council - 14 Jun 2010 Exhibits: Issue Paper Resolution Draft 2011-2016 TIP including Project Map (Exhibit A) and Map Index (Exhibit B) within the document Arterial Street Plan (Exhibit C) Submitting Data: Dept/Div/Board: Public Works Staff Contact: Juliana Fries, x7232 Recommended Action: Refer to Transportation Committee and set Public Hearing date of June 28, 2010 Fiscal Impact: Expenditure Required: $ N/A Transfer Amendment: $ Amount Budgeted: $ Revenue Generated: $ Total Project Budget: $ City Share Total Project: $ SUMMARY OF ACTION: The City is required by law to annually review the Six-Year Transportation Improvement Program (TIP) and adopt the update by resolution. In conjunction with this, the Arterial Street Plan is also updated. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: 1. Approve the annual updates to the Six-Year Transportation Improvement Program (TIP 2011-2016). 2. Approve the 2010 Arterial Street Plan. 3. Set June 28, 2010, as the public hearing on the 2011-2016 TIP. 4. Present the resolution regarding this matter for reading and adoption. 5d. ‐ Transportation Systems Division submits the annual update of the Six‐Year Transportation Improvement Program (TIP) and Arterial Street Page 57 of 179 PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT M E M O R A N D U M DATE:June 7, 2010 TO:Don Persson, Council President Members of the Renton City Council VIA:Denis Law, Mayor FROM:Gregg Zimmerman, Administrator STAFF CONTACT:Juliana Fries, Program Development Coordinator, (extension 7232) SUBJECT:2011-2016 Six-Year Transportation Improvement Program (TIP) and Arterial Street Plan Update ISSUE: Should Council approve the annual updates to the Six-Year Transportation Improvement Program (TIP), approve the 2010 Arterial Street Plan, set a public hearing for the 2011-2016 TIP for June 28, 2010, and adopt the resolution accepting the 2011-2016 Six-Year TIP? RECOMMENDATION: 1.Approve the annual updates to the Six-Year Transportation Improvement Program (TIP 2011-2016). 2.Approve the 2010 Arterial Street Plan. 3.Set June 28, 2010, as the public hearing date for the 2011-2016 TIP. 4.Present the resolution regarding this matter for reading and adoption. BACKGROUND: The City is required by law to annually review and update the Six-Year Transportation Improvement Program and formally adopt it by resolution. The draft TIP is presented to the Council and referred to the Transportation Committee for review in advance of the public hearing. In addition to the projected revenues and expenditures for the future six years, the TIP also includes current year project allocations and past project expenditures. The City Council adopted the previous Six-Year TIP 2010-2015, on July 6, 2009, as a planning document for the next six years. It was distributed to the 5d. ‐ Transportation Systems Division submits the annual update of the Six‐Year Transportation Improvement Program (TIP) and Arterial Street Page 58 of 179 Don Persson, Council President Members of the Renton City Council Page 2 of 2 June 7, 2010 h:\division.s\transpor.tat\planning\juliana\tip\2011\ip2011tip.doc.docx Puget Sound Regional Council, the Washington State Department of Transportation, King County Department of Transportation, the Association of Washington Cities, Puget Sound Energy, surrounding local agencies, the library and to internal departments. Ultimately, all projects in the TIP are presented to Council for review and approval, collectively during the budget process, and again individually when approval is requested for design and construction contracts. cc:Rich Perteet, Deputy PW Administrator – Transportation Jim Seitz, Transportation Planning and Programming Supervisor Juliana Fries, Program Development Coordinator JoAnn Wykpisz, Principal Financial & Administrative Analyst Connie Brundage, Transportation Administrative Secretary File 5d. ‐ Transportation Systems Division submits the annual update of the Six‐Year Transportation Improvement Program (TIP) and Arterial Street Page 59 of 179 CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON, UPDATING THE CITY'S SIX-YEAR TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM 2011-2016. WHEREAS, the City of Renton has heretofore adopted a "Six-Year Transportation Improvement Program" pursuant to RCW 35.77.010, and the plan and program having been amended and modified from time to time as authorized by law; and WHEREAS, the City Council, after recommendation of the Public Works Department, held a public hearing on June 28, 2010, after notice to the public as provided by law for the purpose of considering adoption, modification, and amendments of the plan and program; and WHEREAS, at the public hearing held on June 28, 2010, due consideration was given to the proposed changes and amendments for the purpose of updating the plan and program; NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON, DOES RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS: SECTION I. The above findings are true and correct in all respects. SECTION II. The City's "Six-Year Transportation Improvement Program" and the City's "Arterial Street Plan" are hereby further amended and modified, all as more particularly shown on the attached Exhibits "A", "B" and "C" incorporated herein as if fully set forth. SECTION III. The plan and program, as evidenced by said Exhibits, shall be and constitute the City's "Six-Year Transportation Improvement Program" and the City's "Arterial Street Plan", and shall remain in full force and effect until further revised, amended, and modified as provided by law. 5d. ‐ Transportation Systems Division submits the annual update of the Six‐Year Transportation Improvement Program (TIP) and Arterial Street Page 60 of 179 RESOLUTION NO. SECTION IV. The Administrator of the Public Works Department and the City Clerk are hereby authorized and directed to file this Resolution, together with the Exhibits, with the Director of Highways for the State of Washington and as otherwise provided by law. PASSED BY THE CITY COUNCIL this _____ day of , 2010. Bonnie I. Walton, City Clerk APPROVED BY THE MAYOR this day of , 2010. Denis Law, Mayor Approved as to form: Lawrence J. Warren, City Attorney RES.1455:6/8/10:scr 5d. ‐ Transportation Systems Division submits the annual update of the Six‐Year Transportation Improvement Program (TIP) and Arterial Street Page 61 of 179 5d. ‐ Transportation Systems Division submits the annual update of the Six‐Year Transportation Improvement Program (TIP) and Arterial Street Page 62 of 179 5d. ‐ Transportation Systems Division submits the annual update of the Six‐Year Transportation Improvement Program (TIP) and Arterial Street Page 63 of 179 5d. ‐ Transportation Systems Division submits the annual update of the Six‐Year Transportation Improvement Program (TIP) and Arterial Street Page 64 of 179 5d. ‐ Transportation Systems Division submits the annual update of the Six‐Year Transportation Improvement Program (TIP) and Arterial Street Page 65 of 179 5d. ‐ Transportation Systems Division submits the annual update of the Six‐Year Transportation Improvement Program (TIP) and Arterial Street Page 66 of 179 5d. ‐ Transportation Systems Division submits the annual update of the Six‐Year Transportation Improvement Program (TIP) and Arterial Street Page 67 of 179 5d. ‐ Transportation Systems Division submits the annual update of the Six‐Year Transportation Improvement Program (TIP) and Arterial Street Page 68 of 179 5d. ‐ Transportation Systems Division submits the annual update of the Six‐Year Transportation Improvement Program (TIP) and Arterial Street Page 69 of 179 5d. ‐ Transportation Systems Division submits the annual update of the Six‐Year Transportation Improvement Program (TIP) and Arterial Street Page 70 of 179 5d. ‐ Transportation Systems Division submits the annual update of the Six‐Year Transportation Improvement Program (TIP) and Arterial Street Page 71 of 179 5d. ‐ Transportation Systems Division submits the annual update of the Six‐Year Transportation Improvement Program (TIP) and Arterial Street Page 72 of 179 5d. ‐ Transportation Systems Division submits the annual update of the Six‐Year Transportation Improvement Program (TIP) and Arterial Street Page 73 of 179 5d. ‐ Transportation Systems Division submits the annual update of the Six‐Year Transportation Improvement Program (TIP) and Arterial Street Page 74 of 179 5 d . ‐ T r a n s p o r t a t i o n S y s t e m s D i v i s i o n s u b m i t s t h e a n n u a l u p d a t e o f t h e S i x ‐ Y e a r T r a n s p o r t a t i o n I m p r o v e m e n t P r o g r a m ( T I P ) a n d A r t e r i a l S t r e e t P a g e 7 5 o f 1 7 9 5d. ‐ Transportation Systems Division submits the annual update of the Six‐Year Transportation Improvement Program (TIP) and Arterial Street Page 76 of 179 5d. ‐ Transportation Systems Division submits the annual update of the Six‐Year Transportation Improvement Program (TIP) and Arterial Street Page 77 of 179 5d. ‐ Transportation Systems Division submits the annual update of the Six‐Year Transportation Improvement Program (TIP) and Arterial Street Page 78 of 179 5 d . ‐ T r a n s p o r t a t i o n S y s t e m s D i v i s i o n s u b m i t s t h e a n n u a l u p d a t e o f t h e S i x ‐ Y e a r T r a n s p o r t a t i o n I m p r o v e m e n t P r o g r a m ( T I P ) a n d A r t e r i a l S t r e e t P a g e 7 9 o f 1 7 9 5d. ‐ Transportation Systems Division submits the annual update of the Six‐Year Transportation Improvement Program (TIP) and Arterial Street Page 80 of 179 5d. ‐ Transportation Systems Division submits the annual update of the Six‐Year Transportation Improvement Program (TIP) and Arterial Street Page 81 of 179 5d. ‐ Transportation Systems Division submits the annual update of the Six‐Year Transportation Improvement Program (TIP) and Arterial Street Page 82 of 179 5d. ‐ Transportation Systems Division submits the annual update of the Six‐Year Transportation Improvement Program (TIP) and Arterial Street Page 83 of 179 5d. ‐ Transportation Systems Division submits the annual update of the Six‐Year Transportation Improvement Program (TIP) and Arterial Street Page 84 of 179 5d. ‐ Transportation Systems Division submits the annual update of the Six‐Year Transportation Improvement Program (TIP) and Arterial Street Page 85 of 179 5d. ‐ Transportation Systems Division submits the annual update of the Six‐Year Transportation Improvement Program (TIP) and Arterial Street Page 86 of 179 5d. ‐ Transportation Systems Division submits the annual update of the Six‐Year Transportation Improvement Program (TIP) and Arterial Street Page 87 of 179 5d. ‐ Transportation Systems Division submits the annual update of the Six‐Year Transportation Improvement Program (TIP) and Arterial Street Page 88 of 179 5d. ‐ Transportation Systems Division submits the annual update of the Six‐Year Transportation Improvement Program (TIP) and Arterial Street Page 89 of 179 5d. ‐ Transportation Systems Division submits the annual update of the Six‐Year Transportation Improvement Program (TIP) and Arterial Street Page 90 of 179 5 d . ‐ T r a n s p o r t a t i o n S y s t e m s D i v i s i o n s u b m i t s t h e a n n u a l u p d a t e o f t h e S i x ‐ Y e a r T r a n s p o r t a t i o n I m p r o v e m e n t P r o g r a m ( T I P ) a n d A r t e r i a l S t r e e t P a g e 9 1 o f 1 7 9 5d. ‐ Transportation Systems Division submits the annual update of the Six‐Year Transportation Improvement Program (TIP) and Arterial Street Page 92 of 179 5 d . ‐ T r a n s p o r t a t i o n S y s t e m s D i v i s i o n s u b m i t s t h e a n n u a l u p d a t e o f t h e S i x ‐ Y e a r T r a n s p o r t a t i o n I m p r o v e m e n t P r o g r a m ( T I P ) a n d A r t e r i a l S t r e e t P a g e 9 3 o f 1 7 9 5d. ‐ Transportation Systems Division submits the annual update of the Six‐Year Transportation Improvement Program (TIP) and Arterial Street Page 94 of 179 5 d . ‐ T r a n s p o r t a t i o n S y s t e m s D i v i s i o n s u b m i t s t h e a n n u a l u p d a t e o f t h e S i x ‐ Y e a r T r a n s p o r t a t i o n I m p r o v e m e n t P r o g r a m ( T I P ) a n d A r t e r i a l S t r e e t P a g e 9 5 o f 1 7 9 5d. ‐ Transportation Systems Division submits the annual update of the Six‐Year Transportation Improvement Program (TIP) and Arterial Street Page 96 of 179 5 d . ‐ T r a n s p o r t a t i o n S y s t e m s D i v i s i o n s u b m i t s t h e a n n u a l u p d a t e o f t h e S i x ‐ Y e a r T r a n s p o r t a t i o n I m p r o v e m e n t P r o g r a m ( T I P ) a n d A r t e r i a l S t r e e t P a g e 9 7 o f 1 7 9 5d. ‐ Transportation Systems Division submits the annual update of the Six‐Year Transportation Improvement Program (TIP) and Arterial Street Page 98 of 179 5 d . ‐ T r a n s p o r t a t i o n S y s t e m s D i v i s i o n s u b m i t s t h e a n n u a l u p d a t e o f t h e S i x ‐ Y e a r T r a n s p o r t a t i o n I m p r o v e m e n t P r o g r a m ( T I P ) a n d A r t e r i a l S t r e e t P a g e 9 9 o f 1 7 9 5d. ‐ Transportation Systems Division submits the annual update of the Six‐Year Transportation Improvement Program (TIP) and Arterial Street Page 100 of 179 5 d . ‐ T r a n s p o r t a t i o n S y s t e m s D i v i s i o n s u b m i t s t h e a n n u a l u p d a t e o f t h e S i x ‐ Y e a r T r a n s p o r t a t i o n I m p r o v e m e n t P r o g r a m ( T I P ) a n d A r t e r i a l S t r e e t P a g e 1 0 1 o f 1 7 9 5d. ‐ Transportation Systems Division submits the annual update of the Six‐Year Transportation Improvement Program (TIP) and Arterial Street Page 102 of 179 5 d . ‐ T r a n s p o r t a t i o n S y s t e m s D i v i s i o n s u b m i t s t h e a n n u a l u p d a t e o f t h e S i x ‐ Y e a r T r a n s p o r t a t i o n I m p r o v e m e n t P r o g r a m ( T I P ) a n d A r t e r i a l S t r e e t P a g e 1 0 3 o f 1 7 9 5d. ‐ Transportation Systems Division submits the annual update of the Six‐Year Transportation Improvement Program (TIP) and Arterial Street Page 104 of 179 5 d . ‐ T r a n s p o r t a t i o n S y s t e m s D i v i s i o n s u b m i t s t h e a n n u a l u p d a t e o f t h e S i x ‐ Y e a r T r a n s p o r t a t i o n I m p r o v e m e n t P r o g r a m ( T I P ) a n d A r t e r i a l S t r e e t P a g e 1 0 5 o f 1 7 9 5d. ‐ Transportation Systems Division submits the annual update of the Six‐Year Transportation Improvement Program (TIP) and Arterial Street Page 106 of 179 5 d . ‐ T r a n s p o r t a t i o n S y s t e m s D i v i s i o n s u b m i t s t h e a n n u a l u p d a t e o f t h e S i x ‐ Y e a r T r a n s p o r t a t i o n I m p r o v e m e n t P r o g r a m ( T I P ) a n d A r t e r i a l S t r e e t P a g e 1 0 7 o f 1 7 9 5d. ‐ Transportation Systems Division submits the annual update of the Six‐Year Transportation Improvement Program (TIP) and Arterial Street Page 108 of 179 5 d . ‐ T r a n s p o r t a t i o n S y s t e m s D i v i s i o n s u b m i t s t h e a n n u a l u p d a t e o f t h e S i x ‐ Y e a r T r a n s p o r t a t i o n I m p r o v e m e n t P r o g r a m ( T I P ) a n d A r t e r i a l S t r e e t P a g e 1 0 9 o f 1 7 9 5d. ‐ Transportation Systems Division submits the annual update of the Six‐Year Transportation Improvement Program (TIP) and Arterial Street Page 110 of 179 5 d . ‐ T r a n s p o r t a t i o n S y s t e m s D i v i s i o n s u b m i t s t h e a n n u a l u p d a t e o f t h e S i x ‐ Y e a r T r a n s p o r t a t i o n I m p r o v e m e n t P r o g r a m ( T I P ) a n d A r t e r i a l S t r e e t P a g e 1 1 1 o f 1 7 9 5d. ‐ Transportation Systems Division submits the annual update of the Six‐Year Transportation Improvement Program (TIP) and Arterial Street Page 112 of 179 5 d . ‐ T r a n s p o r t a t i o n S y s t e m s D i v i s i o n s u b m i t s t h e a n n u a l u p d a t e o f t h e S i x ‐ Y e a r T r a n s p o r t a t i o n I m p r o v e m e n t P r o g r a m ( T I P ) a n d A r t e r i a l S t r e e t P a g e 1 1 3 o f 1 7 9 5d. ‐ Transportation Systems Division submits the annual update of the Six‐Year Transportation Improvement Program (TIP) and Arterial Street Page 114 of 179 5 d . ‐ T r a n s p o r t a t i o n S y s t e m s D i v i s i o n s u b m i t s t h e a n n u a l u p d a t e o f t h e S i x ‐ Y e a r T r a n s p o r t a t i o n I m p r o v e m e n t P r o g r a m ( T I P ) a n d A r t e r i a l S t r e e t P a g e 1 1 5 o f 1 7 9 5d. ‐ Transportation Systems Division submits the annual update of the Six‐Year Transportation Improvement Program (TIP) and Arterial Street Page 116 of 179 5 d . ‐ T r a n s p o r t a t i o n S y s t e m s D i v i s i o n s u b m i t s t h e a n n u a l u p d a t e o f t h e S i x ‐ Y e a r T r a n s p o r t a t i o n I m p r o v e m e n t P r o g r a m ( T I P ) a n d A r t e r i a l S t r e e t P a g e 1 1 7 o f 1 7 9 5d. ‐ Transportation Systems Division submits the annual update of the Six‐Year Transportation Improvement Program (TIP) and Arterial Street Page 118 of 179 5 d . ‐ T r a n s p o r t a t i o n S y s t e m s D i v i s i o n s u b m i t s t h e a n n u a l u p d a t e o f t h e S i x ‐ Y e a r T r a n s p o r t a t i o n I m p r o v e m e n t P r o g r a m ( T I P ) a n d A r t e r i a l S t r e e t P a g e 1 1 9 o f 1 7 9 5d. ‐ Transportation Systems Division submits the annual update of the Six‐Year Transportation Improvement Program (TIP) and Arterial Street Page 120 of 179 5 d . ‐ T r a n s p o r t a t i o n S y s t e m s D i v i s i o n s u b m i t s t h e a n n u a l u p d a t e o f t h e S i x ‐ Y e a r T r a n s p o r t a t i o n I m p r o v e m e n t P r o g r a m ( T I P ) a n d A r t e r i a l S t r e e t P a g e 1 2 1 o f 1 7 9 5d. ‐ Transportation Systems Division submits the annual update of the Six‐Year Transportation Improvement Program (TIP) and Arterial Street Page 122 of 179 5 d . ‐ T r a n s p o r t a t i o n S y s t e m s D i v i s i o n s u b m i t s t h e a n n u a l u p d a t e o f t h e S i x ‐ Y e a r T r a n s p o r t a t i o n I m p r o v e m e n t P r o g r a m ( T I P ) a n d A r t e r i a l S t r e e t P a g e 1 2 3 o f 1 7 9 5d. ‐ Transportation Systems Division submits the annual update of the Six‐Year Transportation Improvement Program (TIP) and Arterial Street Page 124 of 179 5 d . ‐ T r a n s p o r t a t i o n S y s t e m s D i v i s i o n s u b m i t s t h e a n n u a l u p d a t e o f t h e S i x ‐ Y e a r T r a n s p o r t a t i o n I m p r o v e m e n t P r o g r a m ( T I P ) a n d A r t e r i a l S t r e e t P a g e 1 2 5 o f 1 7 9 5d. ‐ Transportation Systems Division submits the annual update of the Six‐Year Transportation Improvement Program (TIP) and Arterial Street Page 126 of 179 5 d . ‐ T r a n s p o r t a t i o n S y s t e m s D i v i s i o n s u b m i t s t h e a n n u a l u p d a t e o f t h e S i x ‐ Y e a r T r a n s p o r t a t i o n I m p r o v e m e n t P r o g r a m ( T I P ) a n d A r t e r i a l S t r e e t P a g e 1 2 7 o f 1 7 9 5d. ‐ Transportation Systems Division submits the annual update of the Six‐Year Transportation Improvement Program (TIP) and Arterial Street Page 128 of 179 5 d . ‐ T r a n s p o r t a t i o n S y s t e m s D i v i s i o n s u b m i t s t h e a n n u a l u p d a t e o f t h e S i x ‐ Y e a r T r a n s p o r t a t i o n I m p r o v e m e n t P r o g r a m ( T I P ) a n d A r t e r i a l S t r e e t P a g e 1 2 9 o f 1 7 9 5d. ‐ Transportation Systems Division submits the annual update of the Six‐Year Transportation Improvement Program (TIP) and Arterial Street Page 130 of 179 5 d . ‐ T r a n s p o r t a t i o n S y s t e m s D i v i s i o n s u b m i t s t h e a n n u a l u p d a t e o f t h e S i x ‐ Y e a r T r a n s p o r t a t i o n I m p r o v e m e n t P r o g r a m ( T I P ) a n d A r t e r i a l S t r e e t P a g e 1 3 1 o f 1 7 9 5d. ‐ Transportation Systems Division submits the annual update of the Six‐Year Transportation Improvement Program (TIP) and Arterial Street Page 132 of 179 5 d . ‐ T r a n s p o r t a t i o n S y s t e m s D i v i s i o n s u b m i t s t h e a n n u a l u p d a t e o f t h e S i x ‐ Y e a r T r a n s p o r t a t i o n I m p r o v e m e n t P r o g r a m ( T I P ) a n d A r t e r i a l S t r e e t P a g e 1 3 3 o f 1 7 9 5d. ‐ Transportation Systems Division submits the annual update of the Six‐Year Transportation Improvement Program (TIP) and Arterial Street Page 134 of 179 5 d . ‐ T r a n s p o r t a t i o n S y s t e m s D i v i s i o n s u b m i t s t h e a n n u a l u p d a t e o f t h e S i x ‐ Y e a r T r a n s p o r t a t i o n I m p r o v e m e n t P r o g r a m ( T I P ) a n d A r t e r i a l S t r e e t P a g e 1 3 5 o f 1 7 9 5d. ‐ Transportation Systems Division submits the annual update of the Six‐Year Transportation Improvement Program (TIP) and Arterial Street Page 136 of 179 5 d . ‐ T r a n s p o r t a t i o n S y s t e m s D i v i s i o n s u b m i t s t h e a n n u a l u p d a t e o f t h e S i x ‐ Y e a r T r a n s p o r t a t i o n I m p r o v e m e n t P r o g r a m ( T I P ) a n d A r t e r i a l S t r e e t P a g e 1 3 7 o f 1 7 9 5d. ‐ Transportation Systems Division submits the annual update of the Six‐Year Transportation Improvement Program (TIP) and Arterial Street Page 138 of 179 5 d . ‐ T r a n s p o r t a t i o n S y s t e m s D i v i s i o n s u b m i t s t h e a n n u a l u p d a t e o f t h e S i x ‐ Y e a r T r a n s p o r t a t i o n I m p r o v e m e n t P r o g r a m ( T I P ) a n d A r t e r i a l S t r e e t P a g e 1 3 9 o f 1 7 9 5d. ‐ Transportation Systems Division submits the annual update of the Six‐Year Transportation Improvement Program (TIP) and Arterial Street Page 140 of 179 5 d . ‐ T r a n s p o r t a t i o n S y s t e m s D i v i s i o n s u b m i t s t h e a n n u a l u p d a t e o f t h e S i x ‐ Y e a r T r a n s p o r t a t i o n I m p r o v e m e n t P r o g r a m ( T I P ) a n d A r t e r i a l S t r e e t P a g e 1 4 1 o f 1 7 9 5d. ‐ Transportation Systems Division submits the annual update of the Six‐Year Transportation Improvement Program (TIP) and Arterial Street Page 142 of 179 5 d . ‐ T r a n s p o r t a t i o n S y s t e m s D i v i s i o n s u b m i t s t h e a n n u a l u p d a t e o f t h e S i x ‐ Y e a r T r a n s p o r t a t i o n I m p r o v e m e n t P r o g r a m ( T I P ) a n d A r t e r i a l S t r e e t P a g e 1 4 3 o f 1 7 9 5d. ‐ Transportation Systems Division submits the annual update of the Six‐Year Transportation Improvement Program (TIP) and Arterial Street Page 144 of 179 5 d . ‐ T r a n s p o r t a t i o n S y s t e m s D i v i s i o n s u b m i t s t h e a n n u a l u p d a t e o f t h e S i x ‐ Y e a r T r a n s p o r t a t i o n I m p r o v e m e n t P r o g r a m ( T I P ) a n d A r t e r i a l S t r e e t P a g e 1 4 5 o f 1 7 9 5d. ‐ Transportation Systems Division submits the annual update of the Six‐Year Transportation Improvement Program (TIP) and Arterial Street Page 146 of 179 5 d . ‐ T r a n s p o r t a t i o n S y s t e m s D i v i s i o n s u b m i t s t h e a n n u a l u p d a t e o f t h e S i x ‐ Y e a r T r a n s p o r t a t i o n I m p r o v e m e n t P r o g r a m ( T I P ) a n d A r t e r i a l S t r e e t P a g e 1 4 7 o f 1 7 9 5d. ‐ Transportation Systems Division submits the annual update of the Six‐Year Transportation Improvement Program (TIP) and Arterial Street Page 148 of 179 5 d . ‐ T r a n s p o r t a t i o n S y s t e m s D i v i s i o n s u b m i t s t h e a n n u a l u p d a t e o f t h e S i x ‐ Y e a r T r a n s p o r t a t i o n I m p r o v e m e n t P r o g r a m ( T I P ) a n d A r t e r i a l S t r e e t P a g e 1 4 9 o f 1 7 9 5d. ‐ Transportation Systems Division submits the annual update of the Six‐Year Transportation Improvement Program (TIP) and Arterial Street Page 150 of 179 5 d . ‐ T r a n s p o r t a t i o n S y s t e m s D i v i s i o n s u b m i t s t h e a n n u a l u p d a t e o f t h e S i x ‐ Y e a r T r a n s p o r t a t i o n I m p r o v e m e n t P r o g r a m ( T I P ) a n d A r t e r i a l S t r e e t P a g e 1 5 1 o f 1 7 9 5d. ‐ Transportation Systems Division submits the annual update of the Six‐Year Transportation Improvement Program (TIP) and Arterial Street Page 152 of 179 5 d . ‐ T r a n s p o r t a t i o n S y s t e m s D i v i s i o n s u b m i t s t h e a n n u a l u p d a t e o f t h e S i x ‐ Y e a r T r a n s p o r t a t i o n I m p r o v e m e n t P r o g r a m ( T I P ) a n d A r t e r i a l S t r e e t P a g e 1 5 3 o f 1 7 9 5d. ‐ Transportation Systems Division submits the annual update of the Six‐Year Transportation Improvement Program (TIP) and Arterial Street Page 154 of 179 5 d . ‐ T r a n s p o r t a t i o n S y s t e m s D i v i s i o n s u b m i t s t h e a n n u a l u p d a t e o f t h e S i x ‐ Y e a r T r a n s p o r t a t i o n I m p r o v e m e n t P r o g r a m ( T I P ) a n d A r t e r i a l S t r e e t P a g e 1 5 5 o f 1 7 9 5d. ‐ Transportation Systems Division submits the annual update of the Six‐Year Transportation Improvement Program (TIP) and Arterial Street Page 156 of 179 5 d . ‐ T r a n s p o r t a t i o n S y s t e m s D i v i s i o n s u b m i t s t h e a n n u a l u p d a t e o f t h e S i x ‐ Y e a r T r a n s p o r t a t i o n I m p r o v e m e n t P r o g r a m ( T I P ) a n d A r t e r i a l S t r e e t P a g e 1 5 7 o f 1 7 9 5d. ‐ Transportation Systems Division submits the annual update of the Six‐Year Transportation Improvement Program (TIP) and Arterial Street Page 158 of 179 5 d . ‐ T r a n s p o r t a t i o n S y s t e m s D i v i s i o n s u b m i t s t h e a n n u a l u p d a t e o f t h e S i x ‐ Y e a r T r a n s p o r t a t i o n I m p r o v e m e n t P r o g r a m ( T I P ) a n d A r t e r i a l S t r e e t P a g e 1 5 9 o f 1 7 9 5d. ‐ Transportation Systems Division submits the annual update of the Six‐Year Transportation Improvement Program (TIP) and Arterial Street Page 160 of 179 5 d . ‐ T r a n s p o r t a t i o n S y s t e m s D i v i s i o n s u b m i t s t h e a n n u a l u p d a t e o f t h e S i x ‐ Y e a r T r a n s p o r t a t i o n I m p r o v e m e n t P r o g r a m ( T I P ) a n d A r t e r i a l S t r e e t P a g e 1 6 1 o f 1 7 9 5d. ‐ Transportation Systems Division submits the annual update of the Six‐Year Transportation Improvement Program (TIP) and Arterial Street Page 162 of 179 5 d . ‐ T r a n s p o r t a t i o n S y s t e m s D i v i s i o n s u b m i t s t h e a n n u a l u p d a t e o f t h e S i x ‐ Y e a r T r a n s p o r t a t i o n I m p r o v e m e n t P r o g r a m ( T I P ) a n d A r t e r i a l S t r e e t P a g e 1 6 3 o f 1 7 9 5d. ‐ Transportation Systems Division submits the annual update of the Six‐Year Transportation Improvement Program (TIP) and Arterial Street Page 164 of 179 5 d . ‐ T r a n s p o r t a t i o n S y s t e m s D i v i s i o n s u b m i t s t h e a n n u a l u p d a t e o f t h e S i x ‐ Y e a r T r a n s p o r t a t i o n I m p r o v e m e n t P r o g r a m ( T I P ) a n d A r t e r i a l S t r e e t P a g e 1 6 5 o f 1 7 9 5d. ‐ Transportation Systems Division submits the annual update of the Six‐Year Transportation Improvement Program (TIP) and Arterial Street Page 166 of 179 5 d . ‐ T r a n s p o r t a t i o n S y s t e m s D i v i s i o n s u b m i t s t h e a n n u a l u p d a t e o f t h e S i x ‐ Y e a r T r a n s p o r t a t i o n I m p r o v e m e n t P r o g r a m ( T I P ) a n d A r t e r i a l S t r e e t P a g e 1 6 7 o f 1 7 9 5d. ‐ Transportation Systems Division submits the annual update of the Six‐Year Transportation Improvement Program (TIP) and Arterial Street Page 168 of 179 5 d . ‐ T r a n s p o r t a t i o n S y s t e m s D i v i s i o n s u b m i t s t h e a n n u a l u p d a t e o f t h e S i x ‐ Y e a r T r a n s p o r t a t i o n I m p r o v e m e n t P r o g r a m ( T I P ) a n d A r t e r i a l S t r e e t P a g e 1 6 9 o f 1 7 9 5d. ‐ Transportation Systems Division submits the annual update of the Six‐Year Transportation Improvement Program (TIP) and Arterial Street Page 170 of 179 5 d . ‐ T r a n s p o r t a t i o n S y s t e m s D i v i s i o n s u b m i t s t h e a n n u a l u p d a t e o f t h e S i x ‐ Y e a r T r a n s p o r t a t i o n I m p r o v e m e n t P r o g r a m ( T I P ) a n d A r t e r i a l S t r e e t P a g e 1 7 1 o f 1 7 9 5d. ‐ Transportation Systems Division submits the annual update of the Six‐Year Transportation Improvement Program (TIP) and Arterial Street Page 172 of 179 5d. ‐ Transportation Systems Division submits the annual update of the Six‐Year Transportation Improvement Program (TIP) and Arterial Street Page 173 of 179 5d. ‐ Transportation Systems Division submits the annual update of the Six‐Year Transportation Improvement Program (TIP) and Arterial Street Page 174 of 179 Airport Way S Tobin St S e n e c a A v e NW 2nd S t e v e n s A v e N W L i n d A v e N W M a p l e T a y l o r A v e N W H a r d i e A v e N W S 132nd StRentonAve S S 134th St Victoria SW Langston Rd SW 3rd Pl 4th Pl SW 5th Ct SW 7th St S t e v e n s A v e R a i n i e r A v e 4 t h P l S 7th St S 6th St S h a t t u c k A v e S 3rd Pl W h i t w o r t h A v e S M o r r i s A v e S S m i t h e r s A v e S S 2nd St L a k e A v e S L o g a n A v e S B u r n e t t A v e S900 M a p l e A v e H a r d i e A v e S W S 3rd St B u r n e t t A v e S S 5th St H a r d i e A v e S W S W 5 t h P l Minkler Blvd 7 0 t h A v e S SW 39th St O a k e s d a l e A v e S W SW 27th St SW 34th St W e s t V a l l e y H w y 1 4 8 t h A v e S E NE 31st St SE 8 9t h P l S E 95th W ay SE 95th Way SE 91st S E 9 0 t h 1 3 3 r d 1 3 2 n d P l S E N e w c a s t l e R d R E V 1 3 6 t h A v e S E A v e S E A v e 1 3 5 t h 1 3 5 t h 1 4 4 t h P l S E Pl S E S E 1 3 6 t h S E A v e 1 4 4 t h P l S E Ave SE 8 5 t h 1 44th A v e S ESE 83rd St S E SE th145 S t 1 4 6 t h P l S E Ave S t 8 4 t h 147th S E 1 4 8 t h A v e S E 1 1 6t h P l S E 1 1 7 t h A v e S E SE 88th Pl SE 93rd St 1 2 2 n d P l S E 1 1 8 t h A v e S E SE 95th Pl 1 2 7 t h P l S E 1 3 2 n d A v e S E 1 2 7 t h P l S E 1 2 7 t h A v e S E 1 2 9 t h A v e S E 1 2 9 t h P l S E Wa y S E 8 4 t h SE 91st St 1 2 6 t h A v e S E SE 90th St SE 89th St SE 88th St SE 95th Way SE 95th Way S E 8 9th Pl SE 88th St 1 2 8 t h A v e S E Gensing Ave G e n s i n g Av e SE 92nd St S E 89th PlLake M e a d o w B u r n e t t A v e N P a r k A v e N N 34th St N 32nd St. N 30th St N 28th St N 28th Pl N 29th St N 30th St N 31st St N 32nd St N 33rd St N 33rd Pl N 34th St N 35th St N 36th St NE 28th St NE 31st St J o n e s A v e M o n t e r e y C t N E StNE 36th NE 33rd St B l v d N W a s h i n g t o n A v e N N 37th StN 38th N 40th St 1 1 6 t h A v e S E L i n c o l n P l NE 43rd Pl NE 40th St SE 86th M o n t e r e y P l N E L i n c o l n A v e A v e N E J o n e s N 29th N 30th N 31st N 32nd 33rd SE 72nd St. 1 1 2 A v e . S E L a k e W a s h . B l v d N E SE 68th St. 1 1 4 t h A v e . S E 1 1 3 t h P l . S E SE 80th St. SE 76th St.NE 48th St. NE 44th S t . 1 1 1 t h P l . S E SE 76th Pl. SE 77th Pl. NE 50th St. SE 80th St SE 182nd SE 184th St 1 4 9 t h A v e S E 1 5 0th A v e S E S E 183rd 1 5 4 t h P l D r Petrovitsky Rd SE 184th St SE 182nd Pl 1 6 0 t h A v e O l d P et R d 1 7 7 t h P l 1 5 1 s t SE 176th Pl 1 5 2 n d P l 176th Pl 1 5 9 t h A v e S E1 5 7 t h A v e S E SE 177th S E 176th Pl 1 6 1 s t A v e S E S E 1 7 9 t h St St SE Petrovitsky Rd SE 177th St SE 179th Pl S E SE 181st 1 4 7 t h A v e SE 184th St 1 4 5 t h A v e S E 1 4 0 t h A v e S E 1 3 5 t h S E 1 8 9 t h P l134th A v e S E S E SE 183rd St SE 184th St P l 1 3 2 n d P l S E SE 192nd St SE 192nd St 1 4 0 t h A v e S E SE 181st St SE 180th St 1 4 8 t h A v e S E SE 186th St SE 180th Pl 1 8 8 t h 1 2 4 t h A v e S E 1 2 0 t h A v e S E SE 188th St SE 184th St 1 2 7 t h P l S E 1 2 6 t h P l S E SE 180th St 1 1 8 t h A v e S E SE 179 St 1 3 1 s t A v e S E Pl SE 185th Pl SE 192nd St 184th Pl 186th SE 190th St 1 0 2 n d A v e S E 1 0 6 t h A v e S E 1 0 8 t h A v e S E 1 1 1 t h SE 192nd St SE 190th St 1 1 2 t h A v e S E SE 182nd St SE 186th St SE 183rd Pl SE 186th Pl S 188th St 1 1 6 t h A v e S E 1 0 8 t h A v e S E S 179th St SE 181st St 1 1 0 t h A v e S E 1 0 9 t h A v e S E 1 1 1 t h A v e S E SE 180th Pl 1 1 3 t h P l S E 1 1 4 t h P l S E P l S E E a s t V a l l e y R d SW 43rd St SW 41st St T a l b o t R d S 9 8 t h A v e S E 45th PlDavis A v e S S 55th St V a l l e y F r e e w a y C a r r R d S 43rd St S 192nd St 167 SW 27th St SW 30th St SW 29th St L i n d A v e S W SW 39th St SW 34th St E V a l l e y R d T a l b o t R d S T a l b o t C r e s t D r . S S 25th ST W hitw orth S h a t t u c k A v e S S 36th S 37th St M o r r i s A v e S V a l l e y F r e e w a y L i n d A v e S W S 31st S 32nd Pl 3 2 n dS S m i t h e r s S 2 8 t h S 26th T a l b o t R d S S 38th S 2 7 t h 2 7 t h S 28th E V a l l e y R d 167 1 0 4 t h A v e S E M i l l A v e S S 32nd Pl 515 SE 172nd St 1 0 5 t h A v e S E 1 0 6 t h A v e S E M i l l A v e S S 2 3 r d S t B e n s o n D r S S 27th St Benson Rd S C e d a r A v e S SE 166th SE 168th St SE 169th St Petrovitsky Rd SE 1 1 6 t h A v e S E 1 1 4 t h A v e S E SE 164th St 1 0 9 t h A v e S E 1 1 1 t h A v e S E 1 1 3 t h A v e S E SE 162nd St 1 1 5 t h A v e S E 1 1 6 t h A v e S E C a r r R d SE 172nd St SE 173rd St S 32nd St S 34th St M a i n A v e S SE 162nd SE 165th SE 169th PL 1 2 7 t h A v e S E SE 170th St SE 169th St SE 163rd St SE 161st St SE 163rd St SE 164th St 1 2 3 r d A v e S E 1 2 2 n d A v e S E S E 1 7 0th St 1 2 5 t h A v e S E 1 2 4 t h A v e S E SE Petrovitsky Rd SE 172nd St SE 165th St 1 2 2 n d A v e S E SE 168th St SE 167th St 1 1 9 t h A v e S E 1 2 1 s t A v e S E 1 2 0 t h A v e S E 1 2 6 t h A v e S E 1 2 9 t h A v e S E 1 2 8 t h A v e S E 1 3 1 st A v e S E SE 164th St SE 162nd Pl SE 164th S E SE 169th St S E 172nd St SE 176th St 1 3 4 t h A v e S E SE 172nd St 1 3 3 r d P l S E 1 3 2 n d P l S E SE 163rd St SE Fairwood Blvd SE 173rd St SE Petrovitsky Rd 1 3 5 t h A v e S E 1 3 6 t h 1 3 5 t h P l S E SE 160th Pl 1 4 0 t h A v e S E SE 1 70th St 1 71st P l SE 170th St 1 4 0 t h P l S E SE 161st Pl SE Fairw ood Blvd SE 165th 1 7 4 t h 1 4 1 s t 163rd St 1 4 7 t h A v e S E 1 4 5 t hSE 167th St 165th Pl 1 4 6 t h A v e S E 1 4 2 n d A v e 1 4 3 r d A v e 1 3 8th Pl SE 171st Pl SE 172nd Pl SE 161st Pl 1 3 2 n d P l S E A v e SE SE St SE 167th St SE Fairwood Blvd SE 172nd Pl 1 5 1 s t A v e S E 1 5 5 t h A v e S E S E 1 75th Ct 1 5 8th A v e S E 1 6 1 s t A v e S E SE 173rd St SE 172nd Pl 1 5 7 t h P l S E 1 5 4 t h A v e S E SE 169th S E 1 67 t h P l Fairwood Blvd Pl 1 6 2 n d A v e S E 1 6 2 n d P l S E 1 6 3 r d P l S E S E Fair SE 169th 1 6 0 t h P l S E SE 160th Pl SE 164th Pl S E 1 6 6 t h 1 5 8 t h SE Fairville Blvd 1 6 3 r d P l S E SE 175th Pl SE 171 Pl w o o d B l v d SE Renton-Maple Valley Hwy SE 145th St SE 147th St SE 149th St SE Renton - Maple Valley Hwy 1 5 4 t h P l S E A v e S E 1 4 9 t h Jones Rd SE SE 145th Pl SE 146th Pl 1 6 1 t h A v e 1 5 7 t h A v e S E 1 5 6 t h A v e S E SE 148th St SE Jones Rd 1 5 6 t h P l S E 1 6 2 n d SE 149th St Ave SE 1 5 8 t h S E SE th Pl 1 4 5 1 3 5 t h A v e SE 149th St SE 145th Pl. 1 4 3 r d P l . S E SE Renton - Maple Valley Hwy. 140th Way SE 1 3 4 t h A v e S E SE 159th Pl SE 158th St 1 3 8 t h P l S E 1 3 0 t h A v e S E SE 160th St 1 1 8 t h P l S E SE 157th St E d m o n ds W a y S E B e ac o n W ay S E F ern d ale A v e S E G le n w o o d A v e S E SE 158th St SE 160th K i r k l a n d SE 159th SE 18th 129th Pl R o yal In d e x A v e S E Hills Dr SE S h e l t o n S E 1 1 t h S t 1 1 7 t h A v e S E 1 1 9 t h P l S E SE 19th Ct SE 20th Ct Pierce A v e S E Lk Youngs Way SESE16th St SE 151st St B e n s o n R d S G r a n t A v e S Puget Dr E a g l e R i d g e D r . S P u g e t D r S 18th St S 18th G r a n t A v e S 10th R e n t o n A v e S H i g h A v e . S 9th J o n e s A v e . S SE 161st St SE 21st St E d m o n d s S E 1 9th D r Pl P u g e t D r S E Rolling SE 16th Pl H i l l s A v e SE S E 8th 8th L i n d A v e S W S 23rd St SW 19th St SW 21st St SW 16th St SW 1 2 t h S t SW 13 th St W h i t w o r t h S m i t h e r s M o r r i s S 21st St S 17th St M o r r i s A v e S 167 515 E V a l l e y R d S 15th St L a k e A v e S D a v i s A v e S S 18th S h a t t u c k A v e S S 19th St T a l b o t R d S SW Grady Way S W 1 0t h S t S Renton Village Pl Airport Way S Tobin St S e n e c a A v e NW 2nd S t e v e n s A v e N W L i n d A v e N W M a p l e T a y l o r A v e N W H a r d i e A v e N W S 132nd StRentonAve S S 134th St Victoria SW Langston Rd SW 3rd Pl 4th Pl SW 5th Ct SW 7th St S t e v e n s A v e R a i n i e r A v e 4 t h P l S 7th St S 6th St S h a t t u c k A v e S 3rd Pl W h i t w o r t h A v e S M o r r i s A v e S S m i t h e r s A v e S S 2nd St L a k e A v e S L o g a n A v e S B u r n e t t A v e S900 M a p l e A v e H a r d i e A v e S W S 3rd St B u r n e t t A v e S S 5th St H a r d i e A v e S W S W 5 t h P l M o n t e r e y D r W e l l s A v e S W i l l i a m s A v e S R e n t o n A v e SCedar A v e S F a c t o r y A v e N Way N B r o n s o n N 2nd St P a r k A v e N P e l l y A v e N G a r d e n A v e N M e a d o w A v e N N E 3 rd S t H o u s e r W a y S S 2nd St G r a d y W a y M aple Valley H w y N 1st St N 3rd St Brooks F a c t o r y P l N B l a i n e H o u s e r A v e N E M a i n A v e S SE 2nd Pl U n i o n A v e S E SE 6th SE 5th St SE 6th NE 3r d S t NE 2nd St NE 4th St NE 3rd Ct M o n r o e A v e N E F e r n d a l e N E 1st St F e r n d a l e G l e n w o o d E d m o n d s A v e S E SE 5th Pl SE 5th St SE 3rd St L y n n w o o d S E 4 t h S t I n d e x I n d e x P l H arrin gto n G l e n w o o d SE 4th St G l e n w o o d NE 2nd St SE 142nd St S E 141st St S E 4 t h S tSE 3 r d P l 1 4 0 t h A v e S E 4 t h P l 1st Pl SE 1st Pl SE 2nd Pl NE B r e m e r t o n A v e N E D u v a l l A v e N E SE 139th Pl 1 4 6 t h A v e S E 1 4 4 t h A v e S E 1 4 5 t h A v e S E 1 4 3 r d A v e S E 1 4 2 n d A v e S E 1 4 3 r d A v e S E L y o n s A v e N E NE 2nd St H o q u i a m A v e N E 1 4 4 t h A v e S E 1 4 7 t h A v e S E J e r i c h o A v e N E NE 3rd St L y o n s SE 2nd Ct NE 2nd Ct J e r i c h o A v e N E NE 2nd St SE 2nd Pl D u v a l l C h e l a n A v e S E 1 5 8 t h A v e . S E 1 5 6 t h A v e . S E R o s a r i o SE 136th St. S E 1 4 2 n d P l . SE 137th Pl. SE 144th St. SE 138th Pl. SE 139th Pl. SE 140th Pl. SE 143rd Pl.1 4 9 t h P l . S E 1 4 8 t h P l . S E SE 142nd St. 1 5 4 t h A v e . S E SE 143rd St. SE 138th Pl. SE 139th Pl.1 6 0 t h A v e . S E 1 6 2 n d A v e . S E Lane Liberty SE 132nd St. SE 133nd St. SE 134th St. SE 135th St. SE 132nd St. SE 130th St. SE 131st St. 1 6 4 n d A v e . S E SE 2nd Ct NE 2nd St O r c a s A v e N E Q u i n c y 1 6 5 t h P l S E SE 120th St SE 113th St SE 113th Pl 1 5 2 n d A v e S ESE 113th St SE 124th St SE 120th St 1 5 0 t h A v e S E 1 4 9 t h A v e S E NE 4th St 1 5 5 t h A v e S E SE 114th St SE 117th St SE 124th St 1 5 0 t h A v e S E 1 6 4 t h A v e S E 1 5 6 t h A v e S E SE 116th St 1 6 0 t h A v e S E 1 6 1 s t A v e S E 1 6 3 r d A v e S E Q u i n c y R o s a r i o NE 4th Pl 5th Pl NE 6th Pl SE 128th St R o s a r i o P l S h a d o w A v e NE 10th St NE 4th St NE 5th St NE 6th Pl D u v a l l A v e N E NE 11th 10th St NE 10th Pl NE NE A n a c o r t e s F i e l d NE 9th D u v a l l A v e N E NE 4th St 7th Pl SE 112th Pl H o q u i a m N E St 1 4 6 t h 1 4 8 t h A v e S E NE 8th St NE 7th Pl NE 7th St NE 6th St N i l e A v e N E H o q u i a m A v e N E I l w a c o A v e N E J e r i c h o A v e N E D u v a l l A v e N E NE 10th St J e r i c h o P l NE 11th St 11th Pl. NE 8th St. NE 7th St. NE 10th NE 11th S u n s e t L n . N E S u n s e t B L G l e n w o o d H a r r i n g t o n P l . N E K i r k l a n d A v e . N E I n d e x A v e . N ENE 4th Ferndale Edmonds NE 5th Ct. Ct. A v e . I n d e x P l . N E Ct. NE 4th St. M o n r o e A v e . N E I n d e x NE 8th St. 7 t h S t . NE 10th St. Pl.NE 5th NE 6th P l . NE 6th St. NE 6th Pl. H a r r i n g t o n A v e . NE S u n s et NE 9th N E 9 t h L n . N E L y n n w o o d A v e . J e f f e r s o n M o n r o e J e f f e r s o n NE 6th NE 7th NE A v e . St K i r k l a n d NE P i e r c e A v e . N E S h e l t o n R e d m o n d A v e . O l y m p i a A v e . N E NE 4th St. NE 8th Ct. NE 9th Ct. P i e r c e O l y m p i a Pl. P l . 6th S h e l t o n A v e . N E R e d m o n d A v e . A v e . N E St. Q u e e n NE 10th Ln. NE 10th Ct. NE 9 Ct. NE 10th 9th St. Pl. St. Ct. NE 11 11th Ct. NE 10 NE 6 Ct. NE 6th Pl. A v e . N E T a c o m a NE 7th St. A v e . N E 11th Pl. P a r k A v e . N G a r d e n A v e . N N 8th St. N 6th St. N 5th St. G a r d e n A v e . N P a r k A v e . N P e l l y A v e . N W e l l s A v e . N W i l l i a m s A v e . N N 4th St. H o u s e r W a y N A b e r d e e n A v e . N E S u n s e t B l v d . N E NE 10th Pl. NE 10th St. NE 8th Pl. NE 9th PL NE 9th St. NE 7th NE 6th Pl. C a m a s A v e . D a y t o n A v e . A b e r d e e n C a m a s Ave. B l a i n e A v e . G r a n d e y W a y Win d s o r W a y B r o n s o n E d m o n d s A v e N E D a y t o n Ave. l900 900l W a y N E N ENE A v e . N E M o n t e r e y N 10th St. T a y l o r P l. N W S e n e c a NW 5th St. Pl. S t e v e n s A v e . N E L i n d NW 7th St. 6th St.N W N i s h i w a k i L a n e N 6th St. R a i n i e r A v e . N 124th St. 123rd 123rd St. 122nd St. S 121st St. S 120th St. S 119th St. S 118th St. S 117th Pl. S 117th St. S 116th St. S 115th Pl. S 115th St. S 114th St. S 113th St. S 125th St. S 121st St. NE 12th St. 14th NE 16th St. A b e r d e e n A v e . N E NE 20th St.J o n e s A v e . N E NE 24th St.M e a d o w A v e . N E N 26th St. L a k e W a s h i n g t o n . B l v d N L i n c o l n M o n t e r e y NE 23rd M o n t e r e y D a y t o n B l a i n e A v e . N E K e n n e w i c k NE 22nd D a y t o n NE 27th St. E d m o n d s A v e . N E G a r d e n N 24th C t . A b e r d e e n A v e . N E K e n n e w i c k C a m a s D a y t o n D a y t o n N E NE 17th St NE 17th SE 98th St SE 100th St N e w p o r t C t NE 21st St N E J e f f e r s o n A v e H a r r i n g t o n I n d e x A v e A v e NE 23rd St NE 20th N E 16th St N E S u n s e t B l v d K i r k l a n d A v e N E M o n r o e A v e N e w p o r t K irkla n d Pl N E 1 2 0 t h P l S E NE 23rd Pl NE 24th St N E 2 7th St SE 96th St Q u e e n O l y m p i a 1 2 6 t h A v e S E NE 22nd Pl NE 12th St NE 22nd St NE 21st St NE 14th St P i e r c e P l Q u e e n Pl U n i o n A v e N E NE 23rd Pl U n i o n A v e N E 1 2 8 t h A v e A v e N E N E 2 3 r d NE 22nd PlQueen NE 19th S h e l t o n A v e N E A v e N E R e d m o n d NE 25th PlNE 25th Pl SE 102nd NE 21st NE 20th I l w a c o A v e N E F i e l d A v e N E NE 23rd NE 17th NE 21st NE 24th NE 25th Pl NE 22nd V a s h o n A v e Whitman NE 19th St A n a c o r t e s NE 18TH Cir NE 21st Pl NE 19th St NE 26th Ct NE 25th Ct H o q u i a m A v e N E 1 4 7 t h A v e D u v a l l A v e N E NE 24th St NE 24th NE 24th NE 23rd NE 25th Pl NE 22nd N E S u n s e t B l v d D u v a l l A v e N E NE 22nd Pl NE 20th A n a c o r t e s A v e N E SE 104th NE 17th SE 107th Pl NE 19th St V a s h o n V a s h o n V a s h o n C t N E C t N E W h i t m a n A v e N E NE 23Ct CtNE 20 A n a c o r t e s N E N E S u n s e t B l v d . 1 4 8 t h A v e S E N i l e A v e N E 21st Ct NE 22nd Ct NE 23rd Ct NE 24th CtLyons A v e NE 26th St SE 104th St, Issaquah Rd. 1 5 1 s t A v e . S E S E M a y V alley R d SE 112th St SE 103th St 9 8 t h A v e . S198th Pl T a l b o t R d S 9 9 t h P l S 9 2 n d A v e S 9 6 t h A v e S 9 8 t h P l S 1 0 0 t h A v e s S 203rd St S 204th S 205th 207th S 203rd Pl SE 208th St S 202nd St S 200th St S 199 th St 9 8 t h SE 208th St 1 0 2 n d 1 0 4 t h SE 206th Pl 1 0 3 r d P l S E SE 199th 1 0 5 t h A v e S E 1 0 4 t h A v e S E 1 0 4 t h A v e S E SE106th A v e S E 1 0 6 t h A v e S E S E 1 0 7 t h A v e SE 208th St SE 200th St 204th St SE 196th St SE 208th St SE 200th St 1 1 6 t h A v e S E 207th 1 0 4 t h P l S E 1 0 6 t h A v e S E SE 202nd Pl SE 203rd Pl124th A v e S E StSE 204th SE 208th St SE 207th St 1 2 0 t h A v e S E SE 206th SE 200th St 1 2 1 s t P l SE 200th St 1 2 1 s t A v e S E SE 1 1 7 t h P l S E SE 196th St 1 2 2 n d 199th SE 201st St P l S E 1 2 4 t h A v e S E SE 198th St 1 3 0 t h A v e S E SE 201st SE 196th St 198th SE 196th Pl S E L a k e Yo u n g s W a y 1 4 0 t h A v e S E SE 204th Pl 1 3 7 t h A v e S E 1 3 4 t h A v e S E 1 3 6 t h P l S E 1 3 5 t h A v e S E SE 202nd St. SE 201st St. 1 4 0 t h A v e S E 1 3 8 t h A v e S E SE 200th St 1 4 3 r d P l S E 1 4 2 n d P l S E S E 1 4 6 t h A v e S E St 1 3 3 r d A v e S E S 182nd 8 0 t h A v e . S 8 0 t h 8 0 t h A v e . S P l . S SW 43rd St. 181st SW 41st St. O a k e s d a l e SW 43rd St. V a l l e y H w y . 7 2 n d A v e S l181 W e s t S 190th St S 188th St S 186th St S 190th St S 188th St S 192nd St Minkler Blvd 7 0 t h A v e S SW 39th St O a k e s d a l e A v e S W SW 27th St SW 34th St W e s t V a l l e y H w y P o w e l l A v e . S W T h o m a s A v e . S W G r a d y Wa y M o n s t e r R d . SW 16th St. O a k e s d a l e A v e . S W SW 12th St. l181 F o r t D e n t W a y I n t e r u r b a n A v e S 6 5 t h A v e S S 153rd St Blvd A n d o v e r P k E 6 8 t h A v e S 6 5 t h A v e S 6 4 t h A v e S Martin Luther King Way B e a c o n C o a l M i n e R d Martin Luther King Way A v e S Monster Rd SW T h o m a s A v e P o w e l l A v e S W SW 4th Pl S 140th St 8 1 s t A v e S 8 0 t h S 129th St S 135th St S 129th Pl S 130th St S 133rd St 7 2 n d A v e S 7 4 t h A v e S 6 9 t h A v e S Renton Ave L a n g s t o n S L a n g sto n R d S 130th St S 134th St S 132nd St 8 0 t h A v e S 7 6 t h A v e S S S 8 4 t h A v e S 8 2 n d A v e S 8 3 r d A v e S S 123rd Pl S 122nd St S 121st St A ve S R e n t o n S 126th St 7 4 t h P l S S 1 2 7 t h S t S 1 2 6 t h S tS 1 2 5 t h S t S 118th St 7 5 t h A v e S 6 9 t h A v e S Renton S 120th Pl 7 2 n d A v e S S 118th Pl S 116th St Ave S S 115th Pl S 116th St S 125th St S 117th St 8 2 n d 7 9 t h A v e S 7 6 t h A v e S 7 6 t h A v e S 7 8 t h A v e S 7 7 t h A v e S 7 7 t h A v e S S 122nd St S 124th St S 123rd St S 116th Pl S 114th St 7 0 t h P l S 8 0 t h A v e S 7 0 t h A v e S S 124th Pl S 124th St 7 8 t h A v e S R e n t o n A v e S S 120th St S 115th St S 114th St S 113th St 8 4 t h A v e S Beacon Ave S 6 4 t h A v e S 6 6 t h A v e S 6 7 t h A v e S 124th Ave 6 4 t h A v e S S 122nd St P l S S 127th Pl 6 4 t h S 118th St S 112th St Rainier A ve S Forest Ave Forest Ave Sunny Lake Ridge M ission Dr Dixon Dr D ixo n 7 6 t h A v e S Laurel G arden Pl L o t u s P l 8 0 t h S t R ainier Ave S Ryan St Dr Crest 1 8 2 6 2 1 9 58 11 14 4 3 1 8 7 0 8 7 9 1 55 61 3 0 65 6 7 2 5 8 3 1 7 54 2 5 8 0 3 1 16 8 2 8 9 7 8 21 7 6 0 32 2 35 59 6 0 8 4 3269 3 71 3 72 3 1 40 6 0 1 3 6 4 5 3 54 2 2 5 55 7 9 8 1 3 4 2 6 5 3 75 5 0 12 8 7 4 7 7 2 6 8 8 99 91 59 7 9 3 6 8 8 2 1 2 4 44 7 8 4 1 4 914 45 2 9 2 7 27 6 7 1 3 87 2 2 8 4 7 0 7 8 14 1 0 6 66 15 57 33 8 9 3 33 6 1 3 4 85 2 2 7 0 54 21 4 2 2 3 38 4 8 40 6 7 4 3 0 2 9 2 3 3 9 51 2 8 7 1 5 20 3 7 3 6 76 3 9 8 1 3 3 8 6 1 0 1 0 3 9 910 2 3 21 3 1 8 90 14 4 8 4 6 3 86 4 7 3 7 3 63 47 3 5 5 5 6 24 52 7 3 2 4 47 ³ 0 0.5 10.25 Miles City of Renton Arterial Streets Information Technology-GIS Donnaann Visneski Proposed 2010 Arterial Streets Printed on May 20, 2010 Designation PRINCIPAL ARTERIAL MINOR ARTERIAL COLLECTOR STREET PROPOSED RENTON CITY LIMITS Principal Arterials 1. Airport Way from Rainier Ave S to Logan Ave S 2. Bronson Way S / Bronson Way N from Main Ave S to Sunset Blvd S 3. Logan Ave S/ Logan Ave N from Airport Way to Garden Ave N 4. SW Grady Way from Main Ave S to west City limits 5. Main Ave S from S Grady Way to Bronson Way S 6. Maple Valley Hwy from Sunset Blvd N to east City limits 7. N 3rd St from Logan Ave N to Sunset Blvd N 8. N 3rd Pl / N 4thSt from Houser Way N to Logan Ave N 9. NE 3rd St / NE 4th St from Sunset Blvd N to east City Limits 10. Park Ave N from Bronson Way N to N Park Dr 11. N Park Dr / NE Park Dr from Park Ave N to Edmonds Ave NE 12. NE Sunset Blvd from Edmonds Ave NE to east City limits 13. Rainier Ave N / Rainier Ave S from north City limits to S Grady Way 14. S 2nd St from Main Ave S to Rainier Ave S 15. S 3rd St from Rainier Ave S to Main Ave S 16. N 6th St from Logan Ave N to Park Ave N 17. SW Sunset Blvd from west City limits to Rainier Ave S 18. Sunset Blvd N from Bronson Way N to FAI-405 19. Houser Way S / Houser Way N from Main Ave S to Bronson Way N 20. 140th Way SE from Maple Valley Hwy to south City limits. 21. SW 43rd St / S 43rd St / SW Carr Rd / SE 176th / SE Petrovitsky from west City limits to east City limits 22. Talbot Rd S from S 7th St to S Puget Dr 23. Benson Dr. S / 108th Ave SE from S Puget Dr. to south City limits 24. Oakesdale Ave SW from SW 43rd St (south City Limits) to Monster Rd SW, and Monster Rd SW from Oakesdale Ave SW to west City Limits. 25. Duvall Avenue NE from NE 4th to north City Limits Minor Arterials 26. Houser Way N from Lake Wash. Blvd N to Sunset Blvd N 27. Benson Road S from S Grady Way to Benson Dr S 28. Lind Ave SW from SW 7th St to SW 43rd St 29. Renton Ave Extension from Rainier Ave S to west City limits 30. S Puget Dr / Puget Dr SE from Talbot Road S to Edmonds Ave SE 31. Edmonds Ave SE / 116th Ave SE from Puget Dr SE to south City limits 32. S 4th Pl / S 4th St from Rainier Ave S to Main Ave S 33. S 7th St / SW 7th St from Burnett Ave S to Oakesdale Ave SW 34. Mill Ave S from Houser Way S to Bronson Way S 35. S 2nd Ave from Mill Ave S to Main Ave S 36. Wells Ave S / Wells Ave N from S Grady Way to N 4th St 37. Williams Ave N / Williams Ave S from N 4th St to S Grady Way 38. N 6th St from Park Ave N to Garden Ave N 39. Garden Ave N from N 4th St to N Park Drive 40. N 8th St from Logan Ave N to Houser Way N 41. Sunset Blvd NE from FAI-405 to NE Park Dr 42. Union Ave NE from Ne 4th St to north city limits 43. Edmonds Ave NE from NE Sunset Blvd to NE 27th St 44. NE 30th St / Kennewick Pl NE/NE 27th St from FAI-405 to Edmonds Ave NE 45. N 30th St from Park Ave to FAI-405 46. Lake Wash. Blvd NE from FAI-405 to north City limits 47. SW 27th St from Oakesdale Ave SW to East Valley Road 48. Monroe Ave NE from NE 4th St to Sunset Blvd NE 49. Logan Ave S from S 3rd St to Airport Way 50. 156th Ave SE from north City limits to SE 142nd Place Collectors 51. SW 16th St from Lind Ave SW to Oakesdale Ave SW 52. SW 16th St from Oakesdale Ave SW to Longacres Drive SW 53. Aberdeen Ave NE from Sunset Blvd NE to NE 27th St 54. NE 16th St from Jones Ave NE to Edmonds Ave NE 55. NE 12th St from Edmonds Ave NE to Union Ave NE 56. Monroe Ave NE from NE 2nd St to NE 4th St 57. NE 2nd St from Monroe Ave NE to City Shops entry 58. NE 10th St from NE Sunset Blvd to Monroe Ave NE 59. NE 7th from NE Sunset Blvd to Monroe Ave NE 60. Edmonds Ave NE from NE Sunset Blvd to NE 3rd St 61. Bronson Way NE / NE 4th St from NE 3rd St to Jefferson Ave NE 62. Taylor Ave NE / Taylor Pl NW from Renton Ave Ext to west City limits 63. N 30th St from Burnett Ave N to Park Ave N 64. NE 44th St/Lincoln Ave NE/Monterey Pl NE from FAI-406 to east City limits 65. SW Langston Road from SW Sunset Blvd to west City limits 66. S 3rd Pl from Rainier Ave S to Shattuck Ave S 67. Shattuck Ave S from S 2nd St to S Grady Way 68. Whitworth Ave. S from S 2nd St to S 4th St 69. Morris Ave S from S 2nd St to S 4th St 70. Burnett Ave S from S 2nd St to S 7th St 71. Monster Road SW from Oakesdale Ave SW to SW 16th St 72. SW 16th St from East Valley Road to Lind Ave SW 73. East Valley Road from SW 16th St to SW 43rd St 74. Talbot road S / S 21st St from SR-515 to south City limits 75. SW 41st St from East Valley Road to Oakesdale Ave SW 76. SW 34th St from East Valley Road to Oakesdale Ave SW 77. Hardie Ave SW from SW Sunset Blvd to Rainier Ave S 78. Lake Wash. Blvd N from N Park Drive to FAI-405 79. Park Ave N / N 40th St from N 30th St to Lake Wash. Blvd N 80. Burnett Ave N from N 30th St to Lake Wash Blvd N 81. Duvall Ave NE from NE 4th St to south City limits 82. Hoquiam Ave NE from NE 4th St to NE Sunset Blvd 83. Jerico Ave NE from NE 4th St to south City limits 84. Union Ave NE from NE 4th St to south City limits 85. NE 31st St from west City limits to east City limits 86. N 10th St from Logan Ave N to Garden Ave N 87. SE 168th St from Benson Rd S to 128th Ave SE 88. 128th Ave SE from SE 164th St to SE Petrovitsky Rd 89. Nile Ave NE from NE 4th St to north City Limits as 148th Ave SE is annexed 90. SE 144th St from east City limits to west City limits Proposed Principal Arterial 91. SW 27th St / Strander Blvd from East Valley Rd near SR167 to West Valley Rd (SR181) This document is a graphic representation, not guaranteed to survey accuracy, and is based on the best information available as of the date shown. This map is intended for City display purposes only. 5d. ‐ Transportation Systems Division submits the annual update of the Six‐Year Transportation Improvement Program (TIP) and Arterial Street Page 175 of 179 CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON, AUTHORIZING THE MAYOR AND CITY CLERK TO ENTER INTO AN INTERLOCAL AGREEMENT WITH THE STATE OF WASHINGTON, DEPARTMENT OF GENERAL ADMINISTRATION, TO ALLOW THE CITY TO PARTICIPATE IN THE STATE PURCHASING COOPERATIVE PROGRAM. WHEREAS, the Interlocal Cooperation Act, as amended, and codified in Chapter 39.34 of the Revised Code of Washington, provides for interlocal cooperation between government agencies; and WHEREAS, the State of Washington, Department of General Administration, is a central services agency for the State of Washington that provides access to contracts that are the result of the competitive bidding process; and WHEREAS, the City of Renton has an opportunity to use the contracts that have been negotiated by the State as a member of the State Purchasing Cooperative Program to purchase non public works items; and WHEREAS, it is necessary to document the terms and conditions under which the City joins the State Purchasing Cooperative Program; NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON, DOES RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS: SECTION I. The above recitals are found to be true and correct in all respects. SECTION II. The Mayor and City Clerk are hereby authorized to enter into an interlocal agreement with the State of Washington, Department of General Administration, for the purpose of joining the State Purchasing Cooperative Program. 7a. ‐ Interlocal agreement with WA General Administration (See 6.a.) Page 176 of 179 RESOLUTION NO. PASSED BY THE CITY COUNCIL this day of , 2010. Bonnie I. Walton, City Clerk APPROVED BY THE MAYOR this day of , 2010. Denis Law, Mayor Approved as to form: Lawrence J. Warren, City Attorney RES.1457:5/13/10:scr 7a. ‐ Interlocal agreement with WA General Administration (See 6.a.) Page 177 of 179 / 5f £-7-30/0 CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON ORDINANCE NO. AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON, AMENDING SUBSECTION 4-1-180D, PUBLIC WORKS CONSTRUCTION PERMIT FEES, OF CHAPTER 1, ADMINISTRATION AND ENFORCEMENT, OF TITLE IV (DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS) OF ORDINANCE NO. 4260 ENTITLED "CODE OF GENERAL ORDINANCES OF THE CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON", BY ADDING A NEW SUBSECTION 4-1-180D.4, ENTITLED "HYDRANT METER FEES", AND RENUMBERING THE CURRENT SUBSECTIONS 4-1-180D.4 THROUGH 4-1- 180D.6. THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON, DOES ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS: SECTION I. Subsection 4-1-180D, Public Works Construction Permit Fees, of Title IV (Development Regulations) of Ordinance No. 4260 entitled "Code of General Ordinances of the City of Renton, Washington", is hereby amended to add a new subsection 4-1-180D.4, to read as shown below. The current subsections 4-1-180D.4 through 4-1-180D.6 shall be renumbered accordingly. 4. HYDRANT METER FEES: The following fees are payable at the time of application for a hydrant meter- Fees for hydrant meters: Hydrant Meter Permit Fee Deposit %" Meter and Backflow Prevention Assemblv 3" Meter and Backflow Prevention Assemblv Deposit processing charge (nonrefundable) Cost of Water Meter Rental %" Meter and Backflow Prevention Assemblv 3" Meter and Backflow Prevention Assemblv $50 per meter application $300.00 $800.00 $25.00 $3.70 per CCF Starts on dav of pickup $11.66/month ($0.39/dav) $143.67/month ($4.79/dav) 7a. ‐ Hydrant Meter Fees (1st reading 6/7/2010) Page 178 of 179 ORDINANCE NO. SECTION II. This ordinance shall be effective upon its passage, approval, and thirty (30) days after publication. PASSED BY THE CITY COUNCIL this day of , 2010. Approved as to form: Lawrence J. Warren, City Attorney Date of Publication: ORD:1631:4/22/10:scr Bonnie I. Walton, City Clerk APPROVED BY THE MAYOR this day of , 2010. Denis Law, Mayor 7a. ‐ Hydrant Meter Fees (1st reading 6/7/2010) Page 179 of 179