HomeMy WebLinkAboutCouncil 03/21/2011AGENDA
RENTON CITY COUNCIL
REGULAR MEETING
March 21, 2011
Monday, 7 p.m.
1.CALL TO ORDER AND PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE
2.ROLL CALL
3.SPECIAL PRESENTATION
a. Women in Aviation
4.ADMINISTRATIVE REPORT
5.AUDIENCE COMMENT
(Speakers must sign up prior to the Council meeting. Each speaker is allowed five minutes. The
comment period will be limited to one‐half hour. The second audience comment period later on in
the agenda is unlimited in duration.) When you are recognized by the Presiding Officer, please
walk to the podium and state your name and city of residence for the record, SPELLING YOUR LAST
NAME.
6.CONSENT AGENDA
The following items are distributed to Councilmembers in advance for study and review, and the
recommended actions will be accepted in a single motion. Any item may be removed for further
discussion if requested by a Councilmember.
a. Approval of Council meeting minutes of 3/14/2011. Council concur.
b. Community and Economic Development Department submits the proposed
2011 Comprehensive Plan amendment table for the annual review processes. Refer to
Planning and Development Committee and Planning Commission.
c. Community and Economic Development Department submits 10% Notice of Intent to annex
petition for the proposed Fairlane Annexation and recommends a public meeting be set on
4/4/2011 to consider the petition; 37.4 acres located in the vicinity of 129th Pl. SE and SE
160th St. Council concur.
d. Community Services Department recommends approval of an expenditure in the amount
of $525,000 for the acquisition of the Big 5 Corporation property located at 508 S. 3rd St.
Council concur.
e. Finance and Information Technology Department recommends amending City Code regarding
filing written protests for claims of excessive or unlawful taxes levied or paid. Refer to
Finance Committee.
f. Fire and Emergency Services Department recommends approval of Amendment B to CAG‐10‐
133, with the Washington State Military Department, to extend the expiration date to
7/31/2011 in order to complete mandated environmental and equipment reviews. Council
concur.
Page 1 of 221
g. Police Department recommends approval of a Memorandum of Understanding, and approval of
Amendment #1 to the Memorandum of Understanding, with the Washington State Traffic
Safety Commission, in the amount of $19,903.50 for reimbursement of overtime and salary
benefits for officers participating in King County Target Zero Task Forces. Council concur.
h. Police Department requests authorization to hire a police officer at Step D of the salary range,
effective 3/16/2011. Council concur.
i. Transportation Systems Division recommends approval of a contract in the amount of $157,500
with Barnard Dunkelberg & Company, Inc. for assistance with preparing the Sustainability
Management Plan for the Airport Sustainability Sudy. Refer to Transportation (Aviation)
Committee.
j. Transportation Systems Division recommends approval of a contract in the amount of $135,938
with Otak, Inc. for design services for the Highlands to Landing Pedestrian Connection project.
Council concur.
k. Transportation Systems Division recommends approval of Supplemental Agreement #1 to CAG‐
10‐157, with Parametrix, Inc., in the amount of $492,334.16 for design and right‐of‐way
services for the NE 3rd/4th Corridor Improvements project. Refer to Transportation (Aviation)
Committee.
l. Utility Systems Division submits CAG‐10‐084, Union Ave. NE/Duvall Ave. NE Storm System
Repair project; and requests approval of the project, authorization for final pay estimate in the
amount of $737.50, commencement of a 60‐day lien period, and release of retained amount of
$4,919.48 to Hoffman Construction, Inc., contractor, if all required releases are obtained.
Council concur.
7.UNFINISHED BUSINESS
Topics listed below were discussed in Council committees during the past week. Those topics
marked with an asterisk (*) may include legislation. Committee reports on any topics may be held
by the Chair if further review is necessary.
a. Finance Committee: Vouchers; 2011/2012 Budget Carry‐Forward Ordinance*; Library
Reimbursement Bonds Authorization*
b. Utilities Committee: Friedman Latecomer Agreement
c. Transportation (Aviation) Committee: Operating Permit and Agreement & Sublease Agreement
with Ace Aviation
8.RESOLUTIONS AND ORDINANCES
Resolution:
a. Designating library facilities expenditures for potential reimbursement from bonds (See
7.a.)
Ordinance for first reading:
a. 2011/2012 Budget amendment related to carrying forward 2010 funds (See 7.a.)
Page 2 of 221
Ordinances for second and final reading:
a. Amending City Code regarding encroachments on public property (1st reading 3/14/2011)
b. Issaquah, Kent, and Renton School District impact fees (1st reading 3/14/2011)
9.NEW BUSINESS
(Includes Council Committee agenda topics; call 425‐430‐6512 for recorded information.)
10.AUDIENCE COMMENT
11.ADJOURNMENT
COMMITTEE OF THE WHOLE AGENDA
(Preceding Council Meeting)
COUNCIL CHAMBERS
March 21, 2011
Monday, 5:00 p.m.
Legislative Update;Sunset Area Final Environmental Impact Statement (FEIS) ‐ Briefing; Regional Issues
• Hearing assistance devices for use in the Council Chambers are available upon request to the City Clerk •
CITY COUNCIL MEETINGS ARE TELEVISED LIVE ON GOVERNMENT ACCESS CHANNEL 21 AND ARE RECABLECAST:
Tues. & Thurs. at 11 AM & 9 PM, Wed. & Fri at 9 AM & 7 PM and Sat. & Sun. at 1 PM & 9 PM
Page 3 of 221
CITY OF RENTON COUNCIL AGENDA BILL
Subject/Title:
2011 Comprehensive Plan Amendments Review
Meeting:
Regular Council - 21 Mar 2011
Exhibits:
2011 Comprehensive Plan Amendments
Summaries
Submitting Data: Dept/Div/Board:
Community and Economic Development
Staff Contact:
Angie Mathias x6576
Recommended Action:
Refer to the Planning and Development
Committee and Planning Commission
Fiscal Impact:
Expenditure Required: $ Transfer Amendment: $
Amount Budgeted: $ Revenue Generated: $
Total Project Budget: $ City Share Total Project: $
SUMMARY OF ACTION:
Begin the 2011 Comprehensive Plan Amendments review. This year, there are two private CPA
applications: Barbee Mill (#2011-M-05), and Duvall Avenue (#2011-M-06) and eleven City initiated
CPAs. All 2011 Comprehensive Plan Amendments are itemized on the attachment.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
Approve for Planning Commission review and recommendation the 2011 Comprehensive Plan
amendment proposals as presented.
6b. ‐ Community and Economic Development Department submits the
proposed 2011 Comprehensive Plan amendment table for the annual
Page 4 of 221
H:\CED\Planning\Comp Plan\Amendments\2011\Admin\2011 CPA List.doc
2011 Comprehensive Plan Amendments
#2011-M-01: Vantage Glen Mobile Home Park – Rocale
Rezone from RMH to RMF to recognize request from King County Housing Authority
#2011-M-02: City Center – Angie
Update Element to reflect City Center Community Plan
#2011-M-03: RM Policies – Angie
Examine the RM policies, purpose, and criteria for zoning CN, R-14, and RMF
#2011-M-04: PAA Boundary – Angie
Designate the portion of the Fairwood annexation area that was added by the BRB at King
County’s request
#2011-M-05: Barbee Mill – Vanessa
Request to change the land use designation and zoning from COR to COR and RMD to R-14
#2011-M-06: Duvall – Vanessa
Request to change the land use designation and zoning from RSF to CC and R-8 to CA
#2011-T-01: Sustainability – Kris
Develop policies in the Comprehensive Plan addressing sustainability
#2011-T-02: GMA Review – Rocale
Update Plan to reflect new GMA targets
#2011-T-03: Transportation Element – Angie
Update Transportation Element to reflect current and future needs for transportation system
#2011-T-04: Complete Streets – Kris
Add goal to Transportation Element regarding Complete Streets to reflect work adopted
#2011-T-05: Economic Development – Rocale
#2011-T-06: Landscaping – Laureen
#2011-T-07: Assisted Living Density Bonus in RLD – Erika
6b. ‐ Community and Economic Development Department submits the
proposed 2011 Comprehensive Plan amendment table for the annual
Page 5 of 221
CITY OF RENTON COUNCIL AGENDA BILL
Subject/Title:
Proposed Fairlane Woods Annexation - 10% Notice
of Intent Petition
Meeting:
Regular Council - 21 Mar 2011
Exhibits:
Issue Paper
Map
10% Petition
Submitting Data: Dept/Div/Board:
Community and Economic Development
Staff Contact:
Angie Mathias, x6576
Recommended Action:
Council concur
Fiscal Impact:
Expenditure Required: $ Transfer Amendment: $
Amount Budgeted: $ Revenue Generated: $
Total Project Budget: $ City Share Total Project: $
SUMMARY OF ACTION:
The petitioners submitted this petition to the City Clerk on January 10, 2011. The proposed 37.4-
acre annexation site is located in Renton’s Fairwood Potential Annexation Area. The area is
abutting the current City limits at its northern and western boundaries and entirely within the
Renton School District. State law requires a public meeting with the proponents to consider their
request.
Staff is in the process of updating the financial model used to analyze the impact of incremental
annexations such as this and will present this information to the City Council at the 10% Public
Meeting on April 4, 2011.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
Set April 4, 2011 for a public meeting to consider the 10% Notice of Intention to Commence Annexation
Proceedings petition for the proposed Fairlane Woods Annexation.
6c. ‐ Community and Economic Development Department submits 10%
Notice of Intent to annex petition for the proposed Fairlane Annexation Page 6 of 221
DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY
AND ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT
M E M O R A N D U M
DATE:February 14, 2011
TO:Terri Briere, Council President
City Councilmembers
VIA:Denis Law, Mayor
FROM:Alex Pietsch, Administrator
Department of Community & Economic Development
STAFF CONTACT:Angie Mathias, x6576
SUBJECT:Proposed Fairlane Woods Annexation – 10% Notice of Intent
Petition
ISSUE:
The City is in receipt of a 10% Notice of Intent petition to annex a 37.4-acre area using
the direct petition method; the proposed annexation is called Fairlane Woods. State law
requires that the Council hold a public meeting with the annexation proponents within
60 days of receipt of a 10% Notice of Intent petition. The purpose of the meeting is for
Council to decide whether to accept or reject the proposal and whether to require the
simultaneous adoption of City zoning consistent with the Comprehensive Plan, if the
proposed annexation is successful.
RECOMMENDATION:
On the basis of the following analysis, the Administration recommends that Council
accept the 10% Notice of Intent petition. If Council concurs, the Administration
recommends that it take the following actions (pursuant to RCW 35A.14.120):
·Accept the 10% Notice of Intent to Commence Annexation petition; and
·Authorize the circulation of a 60% Direct Petition of Annex for the 37.4-acre area;
and
·Require that property owners within the proposed annexation area accept City
of Renton zoning that is consistent with the City’s Comprehensive Plan land use
designation.
BACKGROUND SUMMARY:
The proposed 37.4-acre Fairlane Woods Annexation is located at the southeastern
portion of the City limits. The Fairlane Woods Annexation Area is bordered by Renton
City limits at to the north and west, the southern and eastern boundaries are parcel
lines.
1.Location: The proposed 37.4-acre Fairlane Woods Annexation is bordered by the
existing City limits at its north and west.
6c. ‐ Community and Economic Development Department submits 10%
Notice of Intent to annex petition for the proposed Fairlane Annexation Page 7 of 221
Proposed Fairlane Woods Annexation 10% Notice of Intent
Page 2 of 6
2.Assessed value: The 2010 assessed valuation of the subject annexation site is
$27,287,000.
3.Natural features: The area that is built out with single family residential is
generally topographically level with a few parcels at the northwestern corner
having steep slopes along the back portion of their parcels. Additionally, there is
a significant area at the north that is owned by King County that contains steep
slopes, between 40% and 90% grade.
4.Existing land uses: There are 108 single-family residences and vacant land
owned by Renton School District, King County, and City of Seattle.
5.Existing zoning: Existing King County zoning is R-6. This area was prezoned by the
City of Renton as part of Fairwood pre-zoning. City of Renton Ordinance #5561
prezoned the area with R-4 zoning; this zoning will become effective upon
annexation.
6.Comprehensive Plan: Renton’s Comprehensive Plan designates the subject
annexation site as Residential Low Density (RLD).
7.School District: The Fairlane Woods Annexation area is in the Renton School
District.
8.Public services: All responding City of Renton departments and divisions noted
that the annexation represents a logical extension of their respective services
and systems and presents no foreseeable problems. Specific comments follow:
Water Utility. The subject site is located within the service area of Soos
Creek Water and Sewer District (SCWSD) and this would not change as a
result of annexation. A certificate of water availability from SCWSD will be
required prior to the issuance of development permits within the subject
area, following annexation to the City. Staff noted that the City is currently
working on an inter-local agreement with SCWSD for the maintenance and
operation of their water mains within City rights-of-way. The proposed area
will not generate need for additional City employees or responsibilities for
the City because it is within SCWSD.
Wastewater Utility. The area is served by Soos Creek Water and Sewer and
annexation will not change the service provider. The area will not create a
need for staff or present additional responsibilities for the City because it is
not within Renton’s wastewater service area.
Parks. The Community Services department indicated that the annexation
represents a logical extension of the services provided by their department.
When compared with current City of Renton standards, the area has a
shortfall of parks and recreation programming. Also, it was noted that the
cumulative effects of smaller scale annexations lead to the need for
additional staff and resources. If new parks were to be developed in the
future to serve the area, additional staffing and programming would be
necessary.
Police. The Police Department did not indicate any concerns regarding this
6c. ‐ Community and Economic Development Department submits 10%
Notice of Intent to annex petition for the proposed Fairlane Annexation Page 8 of 221
Proposed Fairlane Woods Annexation 10% Notice of Intent
Page 3 of 6
proposed annexation. Staff estimated that the area would generate an
additional 102 calls for service annually. No new staff would be required to
serve the area at this time, however over time small incremental annexations
will lead to the need for additional staff. The annexation does not present
any problems for the department. Staff indicated that the area represents a
logical extension of their services.
Fire. Renton Fire and Emergency Services currently provides fire and
emergency services to the area under a contract with Fire District #40. No
additional staff would be required as a result of the annexation. Staff did not
indicate any concerns regarding this proposed annexation.
Surface Water. The area is located in the Lower Cedar River drainage basin.
Future development will be required to comply with the City’s Surface Water
Design Manual and the Flow Control Duration Matching Forested Site
Conditions should be applied, as well. The area consists of plats that were
constructed in the 1970’s and 80’s and the age of these systems will require
inspections and repairs as necessary. Upon annexation City crews would
perform maintenance to the system and there may be identified a need for
improvements. Although this annexation does not create the need for
additional staff, small incremental annexations over time are will eventually
create need for new staff. Staff indicates the annexation is a logical
extension of their services.
Transportation Systems. The Transportation Systems staff has no concerns
regarding the proposed annexation. Staff indicated that additional
Transportation Systems staff would not be required and that the annexation
represents a logical extension of services. There are several streets that have
sidewalks on both sides of the streets, some have sidewalks on one side, and
others have no sidewalks. The existing curb ramps on these streets are
limited and they do not meet current ADA standards and are rolled curb
which is not the current standard in the City. Also, street lighting is metal
poles with cobra head luminaries on all streets. Energy costs associated with
existing and new street lighting, and costs associated with maintenance of
existing and new traffic control signage and pavement markings that may be
incurred should not be a financial burden. Staff indicated that the City would
assume ownership and responsibility for all existing and new streets in the
area.
Public Works Maintenance. The annexation does not present any problems
for the Department and it represents a logical extension of their services.
Staff noted the infrastructure was poorly installed and has not been
maintained well, if the infrastructure were to be replaced it would represent
a cost to the City. Repair work to this infrastructure may also present a cost
to the City. However, the City would not assume any ownership or
responsibility for any facilities within the area.
6c. ‐ Community and Economic Development Department submits 10%
Notice of Intent to annex petition for the proposed Fairlane Annexation Page 9 of 221
Proposed Fairlane Woods Annexation 10% Notice of Intent
Page 4 of 6
Building. The Building section did not indicate any concerns regarding the
proposed annexation. The annexation does not present any increased need
for City staff.
Planning. The Planning section did not indicate any concerns regarding the
proposed annexation and stated that the annexation represents a logical
extension of their services. The annexation does not present any increased
need for City staff.
ANALYSIS OF THE PROPOSED ANNEXATION:
1.Consistency with the Comprehensive Plan:
Renton’s Comprehensive Plan annexation policies support this proposed
annexation. The subject site is within the City’s Potential Annexation Area, is
subject to development pressure that might benefit from City Development
Standards, and is land that is available for urbanization under the King County
Comprehensive Plan, zoning, and subdivision regulations (Policy LU-38).
Additionally, as Policy LU-36 states, the City recognizes “that it has an inherent
interest in future land use decisions affecting its Potential Annexation Area”.
2.Consistency with the Boundary Review Board Objectives:
(from RCW 36.93.180)
a.Preservation of natural neighborhoods and communities;
The proposed annexation would cause no disruption to the larger
community.
b.Use of physical boundaries, including but not limited to bodies of water,
highways, and land contours;
The subject site is bounded on its western portion by existing City limits
and uses streets or parcel lines for the other boundaries.
c.Creation and preservation of logical service areas;
Water and sewer service boundaries will not change as a result of this
annexation. The Fairlane Woods Annexation Area is in the Renton School
District. The school district boundaries will not change, the area will
remain in the Renton School District. Renton will take over police service
for the 37.4-acres upon annexation; the King County Sheriff’s Department
currently provides police protection to the area. Renton Fire and
Emergency Services currently provide service under contract to Fire
District #40 which serves the area. Pursuant to state law, there will be no
change in the garbage service provider for at least seven years.
d.Prevention of abnormally irregular boundaries;
This annexation does not have irregular boundaries.
6c. ‐ Community and Economic Development Department submits 10%
Notice of Intent to annex petition for the proposed Fairlane Annexation Page 10 of 221
Proposed Fairlane Woods Annexation 10% Notice of Intent
Page 5 of 6
e.Discouragement of multiple incorporations of small cities and
encouragement of incorporations of cities in excess of ten thousand
population in heavily populated urban areas;
Not applicable. No incorporations are proposed in this area.
f.Dissolution of inactive special purpose districts;
Not applicable. There are no inactive special purpose districts here.
g.Adjustment of impractical boundaries;
Not applicable.
h.Incorporation as cities or towns or annexation to cities or towns of
unincorporated areas which are urban in character;
King County has designated this area for urban development because of
its location within the Urban Growth Boundary. The County has also
indicated that it wants to divest itself from providing urban services to
these unincorporated urban areas by turning them over to cities as
quickly as possible. Because the subject annexation site is within Renton’s
PAA and not in an area under consideration for incorporation, annexation
is appropriate at this time.
i.Protection of agricultural and rural lands which are designated for long
term productive agricultural and resource use by a comprehensive plan
adopted by the county legislative authority.
Not applicable. No portions of the proposed annexation are rural or
designated for long term productive agricultural use in the King County or
Renton Comprehensive Plans.
3.A fiscal analysis for the proposed annexation is attached. The fiscal impact
analysis that is used for annexations considers costs on a per capita basis. The
fiscal analysis indicates that the proposed annexation would have an initial net
negative fiscal impact of $12,055 per year. A significant contributing factor to the
negative fiscal impact is the amount of roadway this proposed annexation
includes. Approximately 4,160 lineal feet of roadway is estimated to cost
approximately $9,277/year to maintain. This proposed annexation takes in
roadways that if not included would significantly diminish the negative fiscal
impact. However, it is in the City’s best interest, and is the preference of the
roads division, to assume maintenance of county roadways. Over a 10-year
period, it is estimated that the fiscal impact would become positive at $33,264
per year.
CONCLUSION:
The proposed Fairlane Woods Annexation is consistent with relevant County and City
annexation policies, as well as most Boundary Review Board objectives for annexation.
The proposed Annexation is consistent with relevant County and City annexation
policies, as well as applicable Boundary Review Board objectives for annexation. The
6c. ‐ Community and Economic Development Department submits 10%
Notice of Intent to annex petition for the proposed Fairlane Annexation Page 11 of 221
Proposed Fairlane Woods Annexation 10% Notice of Intent
Page 6 of 6
staff that reviewed the proposed annexation for each department did not identify any
major impediments to the provision of City services to the area or indicate that they feel
the annexation is untimely.
6c. ‐ Community and Economic Development Department submits 10%
Notice of Intent to annex petition for the proposed Fairlane Annexation Page 12 of 221
6c. ‐ Community and Economic Development Department submits 10%
Notice of Intent to annex petition for the proposed Fairlane Annexation Page 13 of 221
6c. ‐ Community and Economic Development Department submits 10%
Notice of Intent to annex petition for the proposed Fairlane Annexation Page 14 of 221
6c. ‐ Community and Economic Development Department submits 10%
Notice of Intent to annex petition for the proposed Fairlane Annexation Page 15 of 221
Pedestrian Walk
SE 161st St
SE 158th St
SE 160th St
1
2
9
t
h
P
l
S
E
1
3
1
s
t
P
l
S
E
S E 159th P l
S E 160th Pl
SE 159th St
S E 1 6 2 nd St
1
2
6
t
h
A
v
e
S
E
P
riv
a
t
e
R
d
Pierce Ave SE
1
2
8
t
h
P
l
S
E
S E 1 6 0 t h P l
SE 159th PlSE 1 6 0 t h S t
Fairlane Woods AnnexationVicinity Map
File Name: :\CED\Planning\GIS\GIS_projects\annexations\fairlane_annex\mxds\1_fairlane_woods_annex_vicinity.mxd
Annexation BoundaryCity LimitsParcels
December 30, 2010
Ken tKent
Tu k w i l aTukwila
S
e
a
t
t
l
e
S
e
a
t
t
l
e
N e w c a s tl eNewcastle
BellevueBellevue
M er cer Is l a n dMercer Isl a nd´0 1,000500Feet
1:5,000
6
c
.
‐
C
o
m
m
u
n
i
t
y
a
n
d
E
c
o
n
o
m
i
c
D
e
v
e
l
o
p
m
e
n
t
D
e
p
a
r
t
m
e
n
t
s
u
b
m
i
t
s
1
0
%
N
o
t
i
c
e
o
f
I
n
t
e
n
t
t
o
a
n
n
e
x
p
e
t
i
t
i
o
n
f
o
r
t
h
e
p
r
o
p
o
s
e
d
F
a
i
r
l
a
n
e
A
n
n
e
x
a
t
i
o
n
P
a
g
e
1
6
o
f
2
2
1
6c. ‐ Community and Economic Development Department submits 10%
Notice of Intent to annex petition for the proposed Fairlane Annexation Page 17 of 221
6c. ‐ Community and Economic Development Department submits 10%
Notice of Intent to annex petition for the proposed Fairlane Annexation Page 18 of 221
6c. ‐ Community and Economic Development Department submits 10%
Notice of Intent to annex petition for the proposed Fairlane Annexation Page 19 of 221
6c. ‐ Community and Economic Development Department submits 10%
Notice of Intent to annex petition for the proposed Fairlane Annexation Page 20 of 221
6c. ‐ Community and Economic Development Department submits 10%
Notice of Intent to annex petition for the proposed Fairlane Annexation Page 21 of 221
6c. ‐ Community and Economic Development Department submits 10%
Notice of Intent to annex petition for the proposed Fairlane Annexation Page 22 of 221
CITY OF RENTON COUNCIL AGENDA BILL
Subject/Title:
Authorize Expenditure to Purchase Big 5 Property
Meeting:
Regular Council - 21 Mar 2011
Exhibits:
Issue Paper
Commercial & Investment Real Estate Purchase
and Sale Agreement
Submitting Data: Dept/Div/Board:
Community Services
Staff Contact:
Peter Renner
Recommended Action:
Council concur
Fiscal Impact:
Expenditure Required: $ $525,000 Transfer Amendment: $
Amount Budgeted: $ $525,000 Revenue Generated: $
Total Project Budget: $ $20 M City Share Total Project: $
SUMMARY OF ACTION:
Council, in executive session on November 15th, 2010, authorized staff to negotiate for the acquisition
of property owned by Big 5 Corporation at 508 S. 3rd Street on November 15th, and for the Mayor and
City Clerk to sign a Purchase and Sale Agreement if negotiations were successful.
Big 5 Corporation accepted the offer of $525,000.00 tendered by the City's real estate brokers, Kidder
Mathews, and the Mayor signed the Purchase and Sale Agreement on 2/18/11. It was executed by
corporate officers at Big 5 Corporation and returned on 3/3/11.
The City now has 90 days to complete its due dilligence in preparation for closing. Costs associated
with this activity are expected to be less than $10,000.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
Approve the expenditure of $525,000.00 for the purchase of Big 5 Corporation property at 508 S. 3rd
Street.
6d. ‐ Community Services Department recommends approval of an
expenditure in the amount of $525,000 for the acquisition of the Big 5
Page 23 of 221
c:\big 5.doc
COMMUNITY SERVICES
DEPARTMENT
M E M O R A N D U M
DATE:March 14, 2011
TO:Terri Briere, Council President
Members of the Renton City Council
VIA:Denis Law, Mayor
FROM:Terry Higashiyama, Community Services Administrator
STAFF CONTACT:Peter Renner, Facilities Director, ext. 6605
SUBJECT:Purchase of the Big 5 Site at 508 S. 3rd Street
Issue:
Should the Council authorize the expenditure of $525,000 for the purchase of property at 508 S.
3rd Street?
Recommendation:
Authorize the expenditure of $525,000 to purchase the Big 5 Corporation property at 508 S. 3rd
Street.
Background:
·Renton citizens voted to annex to the King County Library System (KCLS) in February of
2010.
o The City of Renton was not a part of the KCLS construction levy vote in 2004 that
provided capital funds for library construction and expansion.
o Therefore, the City and KCLS had signed a pre-annexation vote agreement which
stipulated that the City would provide two new libraries for KCLS use at the City’s
cost if the annexation vote passed.
·The City contracted with Kidder Mathews to research available property in both the
Renton Downtown and Renton Highlands for consideration in addition to the existing
library sites.
·The City then hired Mithun Architects (Mithun) to create a Library Site Study, with input
from the City Administration and Council, and City and KCLS staff, which would provide a
preferred site list for each library branch.
o Mithun has experience in designing KCLS libraries and the firm is familiar with the
location criteria that KCLS has established.
o As project architects for the rehabilitation of the Renton Pavilion, Mithun is also
very familiar with Renton’s historic downtown.
o Mithun was also the firm responsible for the production of the Sunset Area
Community Investment Strategy, which was completed in 2010 after much
stakeholder and public input.
·It became necessary to supplement this study with a structural analysis of the existing
downtown library. If the existing library was to be remodeled for use by KCLS,
substantial mechanical and energy upgrades would need to be performed. These alone
could trigger compliance with current seismic standards, which have changed
considerably since the library was built. Beyond that, notes on the original blueprints
6d. ‐ Community Services Department recommends approval of an
expenditure in the amount of $525,000 for the acquisition of the Big 5
Page 24 of 221
c:\big 5.doc
indicated that certain areas of the floor do not have the load ratings that are necessary
for stacks. It was important to understand the building’s limitations relative to KCLS’
operational requirements.
·Once the seismic analysis was done, it became possible for a cost estimator to establish
the relative cost for each of the potential sites, including a remodeled current library
option. These relative costs were included in Mithun’s Site Study.
·On November 1, 2010, KCLS staff presented the King County Library System Area
Analysis at the Council Committee of the Whole meeting, which provided the criteria
that KCLS has found to be of critical importance to the success of their system and its
individual branches.
·On November 15, 2010, Council met in Executive Session to review and discuss the
findings of the Library Site Analysis and agreed that staff should pursue the purchase of
the Big 5 Corporation property at 508 S. 3rd Street for the downtown library branch. Big
5 had previously leased larger premises on Grady Way with plans to phase out its
operation of the store at 508 S. 3rd Street.
·Kidder Mathews represented the City in negotiations with the broker for the Big 5
Corporation. (Brokerage fees will be paid by the seller.) Kidder Mathews presented a
draft Purchase and Sale Agreement to Big 5.
·The Big 5 Corporation accepted the City’s proposal to purchase the property for
$525,000. It took several months to finalize all of the terms and conditions of the
Purchase and Sale Agreement.
·The Mayor and City Clerk signed the Purchase and Sale Agreement on February 18,
2011. Big 5 corporate officers countersigned and returned the agreement on March 3,
2011.
·The agreement requires a cash payment of $525,000 at closing, which, per the
conditions of the agreement, may occur as soon as June 13, 2011.
Conclusion:
This property is an ideal site for the new downtown library and it is available at a very
reasonable price.
cc:Jay Covington, Chief Administrative Officer
Iwen Wang, Finance & IS Administrator
Larry Warren, City Attorney
6d. ‐ Community Services Department recommends approval of an
expenditure in the amount of $525,000 for the acquisition of the Big 5
Page 25 of 221
6d. ‐ Community Services Department recommends approval of an
expenditure in the amount of $525,000 for the acquisition of the Big 5
Page 26 of 221
6d. ‐ Community Services Department recommends approval of an
expenditure in the amount of $525,000 for the acquisition of the Big 5
Page 27 of 221
6d. ‐ Community Services Department recommends approval of an
expenditure in the amount of $525,000 for the acquisition of the Big 5
Page 28 of 221
6d. ‐ Community Services Department recommends approval of an
expenditure in the amount of $525,000 for the acquisition of the Big 5
Page 29 of 221
6d. ‐ Community Services Department recommends approval of an
expenditure in the amount of $525,000 for the acquisition of the Big 5
Page 30 of 221
6d. ‐ Community Services Department recommends approval of an
expenditure in the amount of $525,000 for the acquisition of the Big 5
Page 31 of 221
6d. ‐ Community Services Department recommends approval of an
expenditure in the amount of $525,000 for the acquisition of the Big 5
Page 32 of 221
6d. ‐ Community Services Department recommends approval of an
expenditure in the amount of $525,000 for the acquisition of the Big 5
Page 33 of 221
6d. ‐ Community Services Department recommends approval of an
expenditure in the amount of $525,000 for the acquisition of the Big 5
Page 34 of 221
6d. ‐ Community Services Department recommends approval of an
expenditure in the amount of $525,000 for the acquisition of the Big 5
Page 35 of 221
6d. ‐ Community Services Department recommends approval of an
expenditure in the amount of $525,000 for the acquisition of the Big 5
Page 36 of 221
6d. ‐ Community Services Department recommends approval of an
expenditure in the amount of $525,000 for the acquisition of the Big 5
Page 37 of 221
6d. ‐ Community Services Department recommends approval of an
expenditure in the amount of $525,000 for the acquisition of the Big 5
Page 38 of 221
6d. ‐ Community Services Department recommends approval of an
expenditure in the amount of $525,000 for the acquisition of the Big 5
Page 39 of 221
6d. ‐ Community Services Department recommends approval of an
expenditure in the amount of $525,000 for the acquisition of the Big 5
Page 40 of 221
6d. ‐ Community Services Department recommends approval of an
expenditure in the amount of $525,000 for the acquisition of the Big 5
Page 41 of 221
6d. ‐ Community Services Department recommends approval of an
expenditure in the amount of $525,000 for the acquisition of the Big 5
Page 42 of 221
6d. ‐ Community Services Department recommends approval of an
expenditure in the amount of $525,000 for the acquisition of the Big 5
Page 43 of 221
6d. ‐ Community Services Department recommends approval of an
expenditure in the amount of $525,000 for the acquisition of the Big 5
Page 44 of 221
6d. ‐ Community Services Department recommends approval of an
expenditure in the amount of $525,000 for the acquisition of the Big 5
Page 45 of 221
6d. ‐ Community Services Department recommends approval of an
expenditure in the amount of $525,000 for the acquisition of the Big 5
Page 46 of 221
6d. ‐ Community Services Department recommends approval of an
expenditure in the amount of $525,000 for the acquisition of the Big 5
Page 47 of 221
6d. ‐ Community Services Department recommends approval of an
expenditure in the amount of $525,000 for the acquisition of the Big 5
Page 48 of 221
6d. ‐ Community Services Department recommends approval of an
expenditure in the amount of $525,000 for the acquisition of the Big 5
Page 49 of 221
6d. ‐ Community Services Department recommends approval of an
expenditure in the amount of $525,000 for the acquisition of the Big 5
Page 50 of 221
6d. ‐ Community Services Department recommends approval of an
expenditure in the amount of $525,000 for the acquisition of the Big 5
Page 51 of 221
6d. ‐ Community Services Department recommends approval of an
expenditure in the amount of $525,000 for the acquisition of the Big 5
Page 52 of 221
6d. ‐ Community Services Department recommends approval of an
expenditure in the amount of $525,000 for the acquisition of the Big 5
Page 53 of 221
6d. ‐ Community Services Department recommends approval of an
expenditure in the amount of $525,000 for the acquisition of the Big 5
Page 54 of 221
CITY OF RENTON COUNCIL AGENDA BILL
Subject/Title:
Code Amendment of Section 5-21-2 Ordinance
Meeting:
Regular Council - 21 Mar 2011
Exhibits:
Ordinance
Submitting Data: Dept/Div/Board:
Finance & Information Technology
Staff Contact:
Iwen Wang, Administrator
Recommended Action:
Refer to Finance Committee
Fiscal Impact:
Expenditure Required: $ 0 Transfer Amendment: $
Amount Budgeted: $ Revenue Generated: $
Total Project Budget: $ City Share Total Project: $
SUMMARY OF ACTION:
The ordinance would amend Section 5-21-2 of Chapter 21 of Title V Code (Finance and Business
Regulations) to add language requiring a taxpayer that claims the City's taxes levied or paid to be unlawful or
excessive to file a written protest with the City and to continue paying the taxes in question until a
determination can be made by the City.
This is to prevent tax payers form not paying taxes unilaterally based on their interpretation of the City or
State laws without City knowledge. This is also to prevent accumulation of significant tax bills/liabilities
that will be difficult for the City to collect and result in unfair burden on the remaining law abiding taxpayers
who end up paying a portion of the uncollected taxes and the costs we incur collecting them.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
Approve Ordinance amending Section 5-21-2 of Chapter 21 of Title V Code.
6e. ‐ Finance and Information Technology Department recommends
amending City Code regarding filing written protests for claims of Page 55 of 221
6e. ‐ Finance and Information Technology Department recommends
amending City Code regarding filing written protests for claims of Page 56 of 221
6e. ‐ Finance and Information Technology Department recommends
amending City Code regarding filing written protests for claims of Page 57 of 221
CITY OF RENTON COUNCIL AGENDA BILL
Subject/Title:
2010 Emergency Performance Grant (EMPG)
Amendment B - Contract Extension
Meeting:
Regular Council - 21 Mar 2011
Exhibits:
Issue Paper
2010 EMPG Contract E10-316 Amendment B
Submitting Data: Dept/Div/Board:
Fire & Emergency Services
Staff Contact:
Deborah Needham, Emergency Management
Director
Recommended Action:
Council Concur
Fiscal Impact:
Expenditure Required: $ 0 Transfer Amendment: $0
Amount Budgeted: $ 0 Revenue Generated: $0
Total Project Budget: $ 0 City Share Total Project: $ 0
SUMMARY OF ACTION:
The purpose of the EMPG is to improve local emergency management programs. The EMPG provides
supplemental funding to support the key components of a comprehensive national emergency
management system for disasters and emergencies. The City was granted $130,366 through the EMPG
for the 2010 fiscal year. Due to federally mandated environmental and equipment reviews for grant
deliverables we need to extend the deadline until July 31, 2011.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
Authorize the Mayor to sign Amendment B to the Washington State Military Department and the U.S.
Homeland Security Emergency Management Performance Grant, Contract #E10-316, extending the grant
deadline until July 31, 2011
6f. ‐ Fire and Emergency Services Department recommends approval of
Amendment B to CAG‐10‐133, with the Washington State Military Page 58 of 221
6f. ‐ Fire and Emergency Services Department recommends approval of
Amendment B to CAG‐10‐133, with the Washington State Military Page 59 of 221
DHS-EMPG-FFY 10 Page 1 of 2 City of Renton Fire and Emergency Services Department E10-316 Amendment B
Washington State Military Department
AMENDMENT
1. CONTRACTOR NAME/ADDRESS:
City of Renton
Fire and Emergency Services Department
1055 South Grady Way
Renton, WA 98057
2. CONTRACT NUMBER:
E10-316
3. AMENDMENT NUMBER:
B
4. CONTRACTOR CONTACT PERSON, NAME/TITLE:
Kelly Carey, (425) 430-7053
kcarey@rentonwa.gov
5. MD STAFF CONTACT, NAME/TELEPHONE:
Charma Anderson (253) 512-7064
c.anderson@emd.wa.gov
6. TIN or SSN:
91-6001271
7. CATALOG OF FEDERAL DOMESTIC
ASST. (CFDA) #: 97.042 EMPG
8. FUNDING SOURCE NAME/AGREEMENT #:
2010-EP-EO-0027
9. FUNDING AUTHORITY:
Washington State Military Department (Department) and U.S. Department of Homeland Security (DHS)
10. DESCRIPTION/JUSTIFICATION OF AMENDMENT, MODIFICATION, OR CHANGE ORDER:
The U.S. Department of Homeland Security (DHS) Emergency Management Performance Grant (EMPG) provided
federal funding to enhance and sustain emergency management programs. City of Renton requests an extension to
complete the purchase, delivery and installation of equipment. The EMPG Program Manager has reviewed and
approved this amendment. The time extension is allowable under the grant provisions.
11. AMENDMENT TERMS AND CONDITIONS:
1. Change the overall contract expiration date from March 31, 2011 to July 31, 2011.
2. The contract amount of $130,366 remains unchanged.
3. Replace the original Milestone Timeline with the attached Revised Milestone Timeline.
This Amendment is incorporated in and made a part of the contract. Except as amended herein, all other terms and
conditions of the contract remain in full force and effect. Any reference in the original contract or an Amendment to the
“contract” shall mean “contract as amended”. The Department and Contractor acknowledge and accept the terms of this
Amendment as identified above, effective on the final date of execution below. By signing this Amendment, the
signatories warrant they have the authority to execute this Amendment.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have executed this Amendment:
FOR THE DEPARTMENT:
______________________________________
Signature Date
James M. Mullen, Director
Emergency Management Division
Washington Military Department
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
Brian E. Buchholz (signature on file) 3/12/2010
Assistant Attorney General
FOR THE CONTRACTOR:
________________________________________
Signature Date
Denis Law, Mayor
for
City of Renton
Fire and Emergency Services Department
Attest: _____________________________________
Bonnie Walton, City Clerk
Form 10/27/00
6f. ‐ Fire and Emergency Services Department recommends approval of
Amendment B to CAG‐10‐133, with the Washington State Military Page 60 of 221
DHS-EMPG-FFY 10 Page 2 of 2 City of Renton Fire and Emergency Services Department
E10-316, Amendment B
REVISED MILESTONES
FFY10 Emergency Management Performance Grant Program
MILESTONE TASK
October 1, 2009 Start of performance period.
April 2009 Contract Execution.
July 15, 2010 Submission of Midterm Report.
July 31, 2011 End of performance period.
September 15, 2011 Submit all final reports and requests for reimbursement.
6f. ‐ Fire and Emergency Services Department recommends approval of
Amendment B to CAG‐10‐133, with the Washington State Military Page 61 of 221
CITY OF RENTON COUNCIL AGENDA BILL
Subject/Title:
Target Zero Teams - North and South King County
Target Zero Task Forces Grant/Memo of
Understanding
Meeting:
Regular Council - 21 Mar 2011
Exhibits:
Memo of Understanding - WA Traffic Safety
Commission - original
Memo of Understanding - WA Traffic Safety
Commission - Amendment #1 Increase in funding
Submitting Data: Dept/Div/Board:
Police
Staff Contact:
Sherry Smith Extension 7507
Recommended Action:
Council concur
Fiscal Impact:
Expenditure Required: $ 0 Transfer Amendment: $
Amount Budgeted: $ 0 Revenue Generated: $$19,903.50
Total Project Budget: $ 0 City Share Total Project: $
SUMMARY OF ACTION:
For many years, the City of Renton Police Department has participated in several Washington
State Traffic Safety Commission "grants". (WTSC)
The purpose of the current agreement and Amendment #1 (CFDA #20.601) is to provide funding
for law enforcement agencies to participate in the Target Zero Teams Project. The Target Zero
Team DUI patrols will be deployed at times and locations where data indicates that the most safety
benefit can be realized as determined by the King County Target Zero Task Forces. WTSC will
reimburse the Renton Police Department for overtime salary and benefits. The term of the grant is
from October 1, 2010 to September 30, 2011.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
Approve the Target Zero award and Amendment #1, and authorizes the Mayor and City Clerk to execute
the grant.
6g. ‐ Police Department recommends approval of a Memorandum of
Understanding, and approval of Amendment #1 to the Memorandum of Page 62 of 221
6g. ‐ Police Department recommends approval of a Memorandum of
Understanding, and approval of Amendment #1 to the Memorandum of Page 63 of 221
6g. ‐ Police Department recommends approval of a Memorandum of
Understanding, and approval of Amendment #1 to the Memorandum of Page 64 of 221
6g. ‐ Police Department recommends approval of a Memorandum of
Understanding, and approval of Amendment #1 to the Memorandum of Page 65 of 221
6g. ‐ Police Department recommends approval of a Memorandum of
Understanding, and approval of Amendment #1 to the Memorandum of Page 66 of 221
AMENDMENT #1 TO
Memorandum of Understanding
BETWEEN
Renton Police Department
and
WASHINGTON TRAFFIC SAFETY COMMISSION
THIS AMENDMENT #1 is made and entered into by and between
the Renton Police Department and the WASHINGTON TRAFFIC SAFETY
COMMISSION (WTSC).
IT IS THE PURPOSE OF THIS AMENDMENT #1 to increase
the amount of funding available for enforcement for the project titled:
Target Zero Teams relating to the MOU covering the following dates:
October 1, 2010 to Sept 30, 2011.
IT IS, THEREFORE, MUTUALLY AGREED THAT:
7.Grant Amount: This Amendment increases by $7,400.00 the
amount available to the Renton Police Department for Target Zero
Teams DUI enforcement. Thus the total amount of funding available
to the Renton Police Department will be $19,903.50.
This Amendment #1 will not be binding unless and until it is signed by
persons authorized to bind each of the parties.
IN WITNESS THEREOF, THE PARTIES HAVE EXECUTED THIS
AGREEMENT:
Renton Police Department _____________________________
(Agency)(Washington Traffic Safety Commission)
_________________________________________________________
(Contracting agent- print)(date)
____________________________
(Signature)
_______________
(Date)
6g. ‐ Police Department recommends approval of a Memorandum of
Understanding, and approval of Amendment #1 to the Memorandum of Page 67 of 221
CITY OF RENTON COUNCIL AGENDA BILL
Subject/Title:
Request to Start Entry-level Police Officer
Christopher Nielsen at "D" Step Police Officer
Wage
Meeting:
Regular Council - 21 Mar 2011
Exhibits:
Issue Paper
Submitting Data: Dept/Div/Board:
Police
Staff Contact:
Commander Floyd Eldridge (xt 7512)
Recommended Action:
Council Concur
Fiscal Impact:
Expenditure Required: $ 0 Transfer Amendment: $
Amount Budgeted: $ Revenue Generated: $
Total Project Budget: $ City Share Total Project: $
SUMMARY OF ACTION:
Officer Nielsen was raised in Renton and attended Lindbergh High School, and he graduated from the
University of Washington in 2002. Officer Nielsen graduated from Syracuse university in 2005 with a
Masters Degree and a Juris Doctor Degree with Honors.
Since September 1, 2005, Officer Nielsen was employed by the King County Prosecutor's Office as a
Deputy Prosecuting Attorney. During this time his duties included:
All phases of criminal prosecution including initial charging determinations, plea negotiations, witness
interviews, legal research, and drafting complex legal memoranda and motions
All phases of misdemeanor/felony jury trials through the appellate phase
Consulting with law enforcement agencies during the investigations/pre-filing phases;
drafting/approving/and supervising the execution of search warrants and electronic intercept orders
pursuant to RCW 9.73
Guest lecturer at the Washington State Criminal Justice Training Commission Basic Law Enforcement
Academy and Seattle Police Department's Undercover School; and various legal update training at
several local law enforcement agencies throughout King County.
This is a rare opportunity to hire a practicing prosecuting attorney with substantial experience working
with local law enforcement. Officer Nielsen will be a significant asset to the Department and the City
of Renton.
Officer Nielsen's prior law enforcement-related experience merits a higher beginning salary than "C"
step. This request, if approved, will not require additional funding.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
Approve and authorize "D" Step Police Officer wage for Entry-level Police Officer Candidate Christopher
Nielsen effective his hire date of March 16, 2011.
6h. ‐ Police Department requests authorization to hire a police officer at
Step D of the salary range, effective 3/16/2011. Council concur.Page 68 of 221
POLICE DEPARTMENT
M E M O R A N D U M
DATE:March 14, 2011
TO:
VIA:
Terri Briere, Council President
Members of the Renton City Council
Denis Law, Mayor
FROM:
STAFF CONTACT:
Kevin Milosevich, Chief
Commander Floyd Eldridge (xt 7512)
SUBJECT:Request to Start Entry-level Police Officer Christopher Nielsen
at “D” – Step Police Officer Wage
ISSUE:
Should the City Council authorize the starting compensation for Entry-level Police Officer
Candidate Christopher Nielsen at Step “D” of the Police Officer salary range?
RECOMMENDATION:
Approve and authorize “D” Step Police Officer wage for Entry Level Police Officer
Candidate Christopher Nielsen (effective hire date of March 16, 2011).
BACKGROUND:
Officer Nielsen was raised in Renton and attended Lindbergh High School and he
graduated from the University of Washington in 2002. Officer Nielsen graduated from
Syracuse University in 2005 with a Masters Degree and a Juris Doctor Degree with
Honors.
Since September 1, 2005, Officer Nielsen was employed by the King County Prosecutor’s
Office as a Deputy Prosecuting Attorney. During this time his duties included:
·All phases of criminal prosecution including initial charging determinations, plea
negotiations, witness interviews, legal research, and drafting complex legal
memoranda and motions
·All phases of misdemeanor/felony jury trials through the appellate phase
·Consulting with law enforcement agencies during the investigations/pre-filing
phases; drafting/approving/ and supervising the execution of search warrants
and electronic intercept orders pursuant to RCW 9.73
·Guest lecturer at the Washington State Criminal Justice Training Commission
6h. ‐ Police Department requests authorization to hire a police officer at
Step D of the salary range, effective 3/16/2011. Council concur.Page 69 of 221
Page 2 of 2
March 14, 2011
Basic Law Enforcement Academy and Seattle Police Department’s Undercover
School; and various legal update training at several local law enforcement
agencies throughout King County.
The Police Department has attracted many well qualified and experienced officers from
outside agencies. This is a rare opportunity to hire a practicing prosecuting attorney
with substantial experience working with local law enforcement. Officer Nielsen will be
a significant asset to the Department and the City of Renton.
According to City policy, I am authorized to offer new employees a salary of up to “C”
step without Council approval. Entry-level officers with the Renton Police Department
reach “D” step with three years of service.
Officer Nielsen’s prior law enforcement-related experience merits a higher beginning
salary than “C” step. This request, if approved, will not require additional funding.
6h. ‐ Police Department requests authorization to hire a police officer at
Step D of the salary range, effective 3/16/2011. Council concur.Page 70 of 221
CITY OF RENTON COUNCIL AGENDA BILL
Subject/Title:
Barnard Dunkelberg & Company, Inc. Standard
Consultant Contract
Meeting:
Regular Council - 21 Mar 2011
Exhibits:
Issue Paper
Standard Consultant Contract
Submitting Data: Dept/Div/Board:
Public Works
Staff Contact:
Ryan Zulauf, Airport Manager (ext. 7417)
Recommended Action:
Refer to Transportation/Aviation Committee
Fiscal Impact:
Expenditure Required: $ $157,500 Transfer Amendment: $
Amount Budgeted: $ $156,000 Revenue Generated: $
Total Project Budget: $ $157,500 City Share Total Project: $ $7,500
SUMMARY OF ACTION:
The consulting firm of Barnard Dunkelberg & Company, Inc. was selected through the professional
services consultant selection process established in Purchasing Policy 250-02 to assist the City in
preparing the Sustainability Management Plan for the Airport Sustainability Study. The objective of the
Sustainability Management Plan is to develop, balance, and manage an increasingly complex set of
goals and opportunities to ensure the long-term sustainability of the Airport. The project is funded
through the FAA with a $150,000 grant, which requires a 5 percent match using Airport generated
revenues.
The anticipated project completion date is January 31, 2012, and the Renton Airport Advisory Committee
will be extensively involved from the beginning of the project to ensure community involvement in the
development of the Sustainability Management Plan.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
Approve the contract with Barnard Dunkelberg and Company, Inc. for development of the Airport
Sustainability Management Plan and authorize the Mayor and City Clerk to sign the contract.
6i. ‐ Transportation Systems Division recommends approval of a contract
in the amount of $157,500 with Barnard Dunkelberg & Company, Inc. for Page 71 of 221
6i. ‐ Transportation Systems Division recommends approval of a contract
in the amount of $157,500 with Barnard Dunkelberg & Company, Inc. for Page 72 of 221
6i. ‐ Transportation Systems Division recommends approval of a contract
in the amount of $157,500 with Barnard Dunkelberg & Company, Inc. for Page 73 of 221
6i. ‐ Transportation Systems Division recommends approval of a contract
in the amount of $157,500 with Barnard Dunkelberg & Company, Inc. for Page 74 of 221
6i. ‐ Transportation Systems Division recommends approval of a contract
in the amount of $157,500 with Barnard Dunkelberg & Company, Inc. for Page 75 of 221
6i. ‐ Transportation Systems Division recommends approval of a contract
in the amount of $157,500 with Barnard Dunkelberg & Company, Inc. for Page 76 of 221
6i. ‐ Transportation Systems Division recommends approval of a contract
in the amount of $157,500 with Barnard Dunkelberg & Company, Inc. for Page 77 of 221
6i. ‐ Transportation Systems Division recommends approval of a contract
in the amount of $157,500 with Barnard Dunkelberg & Company, Inc. for Page 78 of 221
6i. ‐ Transportation Systems Division recommends approval of a contract
in the amount of $157,500 with Barnard Dunkelberg & Company, Inc. for Page 79 of 221
6i. ‐ Transportation Systems Division recommends approval of a contract
in the amount of $157,500 with Barnard Dunkelberg & Company, Inc. for Page 80 of 221
6i. ‐ Transportation Systems Division recommends approval of a contract
in the amount of $157,500 with Barnard Dunkelberg & Company, Inc. for Page 81 of 221
6i. ‐ Transportation Systems Division recommends approval of a contract
in the amount of $157,500 with Barnard Dunkelberg & Company, Inc. for Page 82 of 221
6i. ‐ Transportation Systems Division recommends approval of a contract
in the amount of $157,500 with Barnard Dunkelberg & Company, Inc. for Page 83 of 221
6i. ‐ Transportation Systems Division recommends approval of a contract
in the amount of $157,500 with Barnard Dunkelberg & Company, Inc. for Page 84 of 221
6i. ‐ Transportation Systems Division recommends approval of a contract
in the amount of $157,500 with Barnard Dunkelberg & Company, Inc. for Page 85 of 221
6i. ‐ Transportation Systems Division recommends approval of a contract
in the amount of $157,500 with Barnard Dunkelberg & Company, Inc. for Page 86 of 221
6i. ‐ Transportation Systems Division recommends approval of a contract
in the amount of $157,500 with Barnard Dunkelberg & Company, Inc. for Page 87 of 221
6i. ‐ Transportation Systems Division recommends approval of a contract
in the amount of $157,500 with Barnard Dunkelberg & Company, Inc. for Page 88 of 221
6i. ‐ Transportation Systems Division recommends approval of a contract
in the amount of $157,500 with Barnard Dunkelberg & Company, Inc. for Page 89 of 221
6i. ‐ Transportation Systems Division recommends approval of a contract
in the amount of $157,500 with Barnard Dunkelberg & Company, Inc. for Page 90 of 221
6i. ‐ Transportation Systems Division recommends approval of a contract
in the amount of $157,500 with Barnard Dunkelberg & Company, Inc. for Page 91 of 221
6i. ‐ Transportation Systems Division recommends approval of a contract
in the amount of $157,500 with Barnard Dunkelberg & Company, Inc. for Page 92 of 221
6i. ‐ Transportation Systems Division recommends approval of a contract
in the amount of $157,500 with Barnard Dunkelberg & Company, Inc. for Page 93 of 221
6i. ‐ Transportation Systems Division recommends approval of a contract
in the amount of $157,500 with Barnard Dunkelberg & Company, Inc. for Page 94 of 221
6i. ‐ Transportation Systems Division recommends approval of a contract
in the amount of $157,500 with Barnard Dunkelberg & Company, Inc. for Page 95 of 221
6i. ‐ Transportation Systems Division recommends approval of a contract
in the amount of $157,500 with Barnard Dunkelberg & Company, Inc. for Page 96 of 221
6i. ‐ Transportation Systems Division recommends approval of a contract
in the amount of $157,500 with Barnard Dunkelberg & Company, Inc. for Page 97 of 221
6i. ‐ Transportation Systems Division recommends approval of a contract
in the amount of $157,500 with Barnard Dunkelberg & Company, Inc. for Page 98 of 221
6i. ‐ Transportation Systems Division recommends approval of a contract
in the amount of $157,500 with Barnard Dunkelberg & Company, Inc. for Page 99 of 221
6i. ‐ Transportation Systems Division recommends approval of a contract
in the amount of $157,500 with Barnard Dunkelberg & Company, Inc. for Page 100 of 221
6i. ‐ Transportation Systems Division recommends approval of a contract
in the amount of $157,500 with Barnard Dunkelberg & Company, Inc. for Page 101 of 221
6i. ‐ Transportation Systems Division recommends approval of a contract
in the amount of $157,500 with Barnard Dunkelberg & Company, Inc. for Page 102 of 221
6i. ‐ Transportation Systems Division recommends approval of a contract
in the amount of $157,500 with Barnard Dunkelberg & Company, Inc. for Page 103 of 221
6i. ‐ Transportation Systems Division recommends approval of a contract
in the amount of $157,500 with Barnard Dunkelberg & Company, Inc. for Page 104 of 221
6i. ‐ Transportation Systems Division recommends approval of a contract
in the amount of $157,500 with Barnard Dunkelberg & Company, Inc. for Page 105 of 221
6i. ‐ Transportation Systems Division recommends approval of a contract
in the amount of $157,500 with Barnard Dunkelberg & Company, Inc. for Page 106 of 221
6i. ‐ Transportation Systems Division recommends approval of a contract
in the amount of $157,500 with Barnard Dunkelberg & Company, Inc. for Page 107 of 221
6i. ‐ Transportation Systems Division recommends approval of a contract
in the amount of $157,500 with Barnard Dunkelberg & Company, Inc. for Page 108 of 221
6i. ‐ Transportation Systems Division recommends approval of a contract
in the amount of $157,500 with Barnard Dunkelberg & Company, Inc. for Page 109 of 221
CITY OF RENTON COUNCIL AGENDA BILL
Subject/Title:
Highlands to Landing Pedestrian Connection
Project Agreement with Otak, Inc. Consultant
Meeting:
Regular Council - 21 Mar 2011
Exhibits:
Issue Paper
Consultant Contract
Submitting Data: Dept/Div/Board:
Public Works
Staff Contact:
Keith Woolley, Civil Engineer (ext 7318)
Recommended Action:
Council Concur
Fiscal Impact:
Expenditure Required: $ $135,938 Transfer Amendment: $
Amount Budgeted: $ $299,000 (2011 & 2012)Revenue Generated: $
Total Project Budget: $ $2,000,000 ($299,000)City Share Total Project: $ $0
SUMMARY OF ACTION:
This consultant agreement provides for an alternative analysis and preferred analysis selection,
and the design of 30 percent plans, specifications and estimate for the construction of pedestrian
facilities along Park Avenue from east of I-405 to The Landing development and to Gene Coulon
Memorial Beach Park.
The Transportation Division has been awarded an STP grant via PSRC in the amount of $240,000
for the design of these pedestrian improvements. The funding for the design will come from TIP
#16 -- Highlands to Landing Pedestrian Connection Project. The Transportation Systems Division
budgeted $299,000 for 2011 for design of this project, and estimates construction costs of
$1,700,000, which are unfunded at this time. Staff will continue to pursue outside funding (grants)
in order to construct this project.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
Authorize the Mayor and City Clerk to execute the consultant agreement with Otak, Inc. in the amount
of $135,938 for design services on the Highlands to Landing Pedestrian Connection Project.
6j. ‐ Transportation Systems Division recommends approval of a contract
in the amount of $135,938 with Otak, Inc. for design services for the Page 110 of 221
6j. ‐ Transportation Systems Division recommends approval of a contract
in the amount of $135,938 with Otak, Inc. for design services for the Page 111 of 221
6j. ‐ Transportation Systems Division recommends approval of a contract
in the amount of $135,938 with Otak, Inc. for design services for the Page 112 of 221
6j. ‐ Transportation Systems Division recommends approval of a contract
in the amount of $135,938 with Otak, Inc. for design services for the Page 113 of 221
6j. ‐ Transportation Systems Division recommends approval of a contract
in the amount of $135,938 with Otak, Inc. for design services for the Page 114 of 221
6j. ‐ Transportation Systems Division recommends approval of a contract
in the amount of $135,938 with Otak, Inc. for design services for the Page 115 of 221
6j. ‐ Transportation Systems Division recommends approval of a contract
in the amount of $135,938 with Otak, Inc. for design services for the Page 116 of 221
6j. ‐ Transportation Systems Division recommends approval of a contract
in the amount of $135,938 with Otak, Inc. for design services for the Page 117 of 221
6j. ‐ Transportation Systems Division recommends approval of a contract
in the amount of $135,938 with Otak, Inc. for design services for the Page 118 of 221
6j. ‐ Transportation Systems Division recommends approval of a contract
in the amount of $135,938 with Otak, Inc. for design services for the Page 119 of 221
6j. ‐ Transportation Systems Division recommends approval of a contract
in the amount of $135,938 with Otak, Inc. for design services for the Page 120 of 221
6j. ‐ Transportation Systems Division recommends approval of a contract
in the amount of $135,938 with Otak, Inc. for design services for the Page 121 of 221
6j. ‐ Transportation Systems Division recommends approval of a contract
in the amount of $135,938 with Otak, Inc. for design services for the Page 122 of 221
6j. ‐ Transportation Systems Division recommends approval of a contract
in the amount of $135,938 with Otak, Inc. for design services for the Page 123 of 221
6j. ‐ Transportation Systems Division recommends approval of a contract
in the amount of $135,938 with Otak, Inc. for design services for the Page 124 of 221
6j. ‐ Transportation Systems Division recommends approval of a contract
in the amount of $135,938 with Otak, Inc. for design services for the Page 125 of 221
6j. ‐ Transportation Systems Division recommends approval of a contract
in the amount of $135,938 with Otak, Inc. for design services for the Page 126 of 221
6j. ‐ Transportation Systems Division recommends approval of a contract
in the amount of $135,938 with Otak, Inc. for design services for the Page 127 of 221
6j. ‐ Transportation Systems Division recommends approval of a contract
in the amount of $135,938 with Otak, Inc. for design services for the Page 128 of 221
6j. ‐ Transportation Systems Division recommends approval of a contract
in the amount of $135,938 with Otak, Inc. for design services for the Page 129 of 221
6j. ‐ Transportation Systems Division recommends approval of a contract
in the amount of $135,938 with Otak, Inc. for design services for the Page 130 of 221
6j. ‐ Transportation Systems Division recommends approval of a contract
in the amount of $135,938 with Otak, Inc. for design services for the Page 131 of 221
6j. ‐ Transportation Systems Division recommends approval of a contract
in the amount of $135,938 with Otak, Inc. for design services for the Page 132 of 221
6j. ‐ Transportation Systems Division recommends approval of a contract
in the amount of $135,938 with Otak, Inc. for design services for the Page 133 of 221
6j. ‐ Transportation Systems Division recommends approval of a contract
in the amount of $135,938 with Otak, Inc. for design services for the Page 134 of 221
6j. ‐ Transportation Systems Division recommends approval of a contract
in the amount of $135,938 with Otak, Inc. for design services for the Page 135 of 221
6j. ‐ Transportation Systems Division recommends approval of a contract
in the amount of $135,938 with Otak, Inc. for design services for the Page 136 of 221
6j. ‐ Transportation Systems Division recommends approval of a contract
in the amount of $135,938 with Otak, Inc. for design services for the Page 137 of 221
6j. ‐ Transportation Systems Division recommends approval of a contract
in the amount of $135,938 with Otak, Inc. for design services for the Page 138 of 221
6j. ‐ Transportation Systems Division recommends approval of a contract
in the amount of $135,938 with Otak, Inc. for design services for the Page 139 of 221
6j. ‐ Transportation Systems Division recommends approval of a contract
in the amount of $135,938 with Otak, Inc. for design services for the Page 140 of 221
6j. ‐ Transportation Systems Division recommends approval of a contract
in the amount of $135,938 with Otak, Inc. for design services for the Page 141 of 221
6j. ‐ Transportation Systems Division recommends approval of a contract
in the amount of $135,938 with Otak, Inc. for design services for the Page 142 of 221
6j. ‐ Transportation Systems Division recommends approval of a contract
in the amount of $135,938 with Otak, Inc. for design services for the Page 143 of 221
6j. ‐ Transportation Systems Division recommends approval of a contract
in the amount of $135,938 with Otak, Inc. for design services for the Page 144 of 221
6j. ‐ Transportation Systems Division recommends approval of a contract
in the amount of $135,938 with Otak, Inc. for design services for the Page 145 of 221
6j. ‐ Transportation Systems Division recommends approval of a contract
in the amount of $135,938 with Otak, Inc. for design services for the Page 146 of 221
6j. ‐ Transportation Systems Division recommends approval of a contract
in the amount of $135,938 with Otak, Inc. for design services for the Page 147 of 221
6j. ‐ Transportation Systems Division recommends approval of a contract
in the amount of $135,938 with Otak, Inc. for design services for the Page 148 of 221
6j. ‐ Transportation Systems Division recommends approval of a contract
in the amount of $135,938 with Otak, Inc. for design services for the Page 149 of 221
6j. ‐ Transportation Systems Division recommends approval of a contract
in the amount of $135,938 with Otak, Inc. for design services for the Page 150 of 221
6j. ‐ Transportation Systems Division recommends approval of a contract
in the amount of $135,938 with Otak, Inc. for design services for the Page 151 of 221
6j. ‐ Transportation Systems Division recommends approval of a contract
in the amount of $135,938 with Otak, Inc. for design services for the Page 152 of 221
6j. ‐ Transportation Systems Division recommends approval of a contract
in the amount of $135,938 with Otak, Inc. for design services for the Page 153 of 221
6j. ‐ Transportation Systems Division recommends approval of a contract
in the amount of $135,938 with Otak, Inc. for design services for the Page 154 of 221
6j. ‐ Transportation Systems Division recommends approval of a contract
in the amount of $135,938 with Otak, Inc. for design services for the Page 155 of 221
6j. ‐ Transportation Systems Division recommends approval of a contract
in the amount of $135,938 with Otak, Inc. for design services for the Page 156 of 221
6j. ‐ Transportation Systems Division recommends approval of a contract
in the amount of $135,938 with Otak, Inc. for design services for the Page 157 of 221
6j. ‐ Transportation Systems Division recommends approval of a contract
in the amount of $135,938 with Otak, Inc. for design services for the Page 158 of 221
6j. ‐ Transportation Systems Division recommends approval of a contract
in the amount of $135,938 with Otak, Inc. for design services for the Page 159 of 221
6j. ‐ Transportation Systems Division recommends approval of a contract
in the amount of $135,938 with Otak, Inc. for design services for the Page 160 of 221
6j. ‐ Transportation Systems Division recommends approval of a contract
in the amount of $135,938 with Otak, Inc. for design services for the Page 161 of 221
CITY OF RENTON COUNCIL AGENDA BILL
Subject/Title:
NE 3rd/4th Corridor Improvement, Phase 1
Supplement Agreement #1 with Parametrix, Inc.
Meeting:
Regular Council - 21 Mar 2011
Exhibits:
Supplemental Agreement
Submitting Data: Dept/Div/Board:
Public Works
Staff Contact:
Rob Lochmiller, Project Manager (ext 7303)
Recommended Action:
Refer to Transportation/Aviation Committee
Fiscal Impact:
Expenditure Required:
$
$492,334.16 (Design &
ROW) Transfer Amendment: $
Amount Budgeted: $ $760,000 (2011 Design &
ROW)Revenue Generated: $$1,050,000 (2011)
Total Project Budget: $ $1,790,000 (2011)City Share Total Project: $ $740,000 (2011)
SUMMARY OF ACTION:
This supplemental agreement will cover the entire scope and fee needed to provide plans,
specifications and estimates for the NE 3rd/4th Corridor Improvements Project. Also included are right-
of-way acquisition services needed for the improvements.
The Transportation Division has budgeted $440,000 for design and $320,000 for right-of-way expenses
for 2011 in the proposed 2011 Carryforward. The contract amount of $492,334.16 includes $397,881.26
for design and $94,452.90 for right-of-way services for the NE 3rd/4th Corridor Improvements, Phase 1
with Parametrix, Inc.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
Authorize the Mayor and City Clerk to execute the supplemental agreement with Parametrix, Inc.
6k. ‐ Transportation Systems Division recommends approval of
Supplemental Agreement #1 to CAG‐10‐157, with Parametrix, Inc., in the Page 162 of 221
6k. ‐ Transportation Systems Division recommends approval of
Supplemental Agreement #1 to CAG‐10‐157, with Parametrix, Inc., in the Page 163 of 221
6k. ‐ Transportation Systems Division recommends approval of
Supplemental Agreement #1 to CAG‐10‐157, with Parametrix, Inc., in the Page 164 of 221
6k. ‐ Transportation Systems Division recommends approval of
Supplemental Agreement #1 to CAG‐10‐157, with Parametrix, Inc., in the Page 165 of 221
6k. ‐ Transportation Systems Division recommends approval of
Supplemental Agreement #1 to CAG‐10‐157, with Parametrix, Inc., in the Page 166 of 221
6k. ‐ Transportation Systems Division recommends approval of
Supplemental Agreement #1 to CAG‐10‐157, with Parametrix, Inc., in the Page 167 of 221
6k. ‐ Transportation Systems Division recommends approval of
Supplemental Agreement #1 to CAG‐10‐157, with Parametrix, Inc., in the Page 168 of 221
6k. ‐ Transportation Systems Division recommends approval of
Supplemental Agreement #1 to CAG‐10‐157, with Parametrix, Inc., in the Page 169 of 221
6k. ‐ Transportation Systems Division recommends approval of
Supplemental Agreement #1 to CAG‐10‐157, with Parametrix, Inc., in the Page 170 of 221
6k. ‐ Transportation Systems Division recommends approval of
Supplemental Agreement #1 to CAG‐10‐157, with Parametrix, Inc., in the Page 171 of 221
6k. ‐ Transportation Systems Division recommends approval of
Supplemental Agreement #1 to CAG‐10‐157, with Parametrix, Inc., in the Page 172 of 221
6k. ‐ Transportation Systems Division recommends approval of
Supplemental Agreement #1 to CAG‐10‐157, with Parametrix, Inc., in the Page 173 of 221
6k. ‐ Transportation Systems Division recommends approval of
Supplemental Agreement #1 to CAG‐10‐157, with Parametrix, Inc., in the Page 174 of 221
6k. ‐ Transportation Systems Division recommends approval of
Supplemental Agreement #1 to CAG‐10‐157, with Parametrix, Inc., in the Page 175 of 221
6k. ‐ Transportation Systems Division recommends approval of
Supplemental Agreement #1 to CAG‐10‐157, with Parametrix, Inc., in the Page 176 of 221
6k. ‐ Transportation Systems Division recommends approval of
Supplemental Agreement #1 to CAG‐10‐157, with Parametrix, Inc., in the Page 177 of 221
6k. ‐ Transportation Systems Division recommends approval of
Supplemental Agreement #1 to CAG‐10‐157, with Parametrix, Inc., in the Page 178 of 221
6k. ‐ Transportation Systems Division recommends approval of
Supplemental Agreement #1 to CAG‐10‐157, with Parametrix, Inc., in the Page 179 of 221
6k. ‐ Transportation Systems Division recommends approval of
Supplemental Agreement #1 to CAG‐10‐157, with Parametrix, Inc., in the Page 180 of 221
6k. ‐ Transportation Systems Division recommends approval of
Supplemental Agreement #1 to CAG‐10‐157, with Parametrix, Inc., in the Page 181 of 221
6k. ‐ Transportation Systems Division recommends approval of
Supplemental Agreement #1 to CAG‐10‐157, with Parametrix, Inc., in the Page 182 of 221
6k. ‐ Transportation Systems Division recommends approval of
Supplemental Agreement #1 to CAG‐10‐157, with Parametrix, Inc., in the Page 183 of 221
6k. ‐ Transportation Systems Division recommends approval of
Supplemental Agreement #1 to CAG‐10‐157, with Parametrix, Inc., in the Page 184 of 221
6k. ‐ Transportation Systems Division recommends approval of
Supplemental Agreement #1 to CAG‐10‐157, with Parametrix, Inc., in the Page 185 of 221
6k. ‐ Transportation Systems Division recommends approval of
Supplemental Agreement #1 to CAG‐10‐157, with Parametrix, Inc., in the Page 186 of 221
6k. ‐ Transportation Systems Division recommends approval of
Supplemental Agreement #1 to CAG‐10‐157, with Parametrix, Inc., in the Page 187 of 221
6k. ‐ Transportation Systems Division recommends approval of
Supplemental Agreement #1 to CAG‐10‐157, with Parametrix, Inc., in the Page 188 of 221
6k. ‐ Transportation Systems Division recommends approval of
Supplemental Agreement #1 to CAG‐10‐157, with Parametrix, Inc., in the Page 189 of 221
6k. ‐ Transportation Systems Division recommends approval of
Supplemental Agreement #1 to CAG‐10‐157, with Parametrix, Inc., in the Page 190 of 221
6k. ‐ Transportation Systems Division recommends approval of
Supplemental Agreement #1 to CAG‐10‐157, with Parametrix, Inc., in the Page 191 of 221
6k. ‐ Transportation Systems Division recommends approval of
Supplemental Agreement #1 to CAG‐10‐157, with Parametrix, Inc., in the Page 192 of 221
6k. ‐ Transportation Systems Division recommends approval of
Supplemental Agreement #1 to CAG‐10‐157, with Parametrix, Inc., in the Page 193 of 221
6k. ‐ Transportation Systems Division recommends approval of
Supplemental Agreement #1 to CAG‐10‐157, with Parametrix, Inc., in the Page 194 of 221
6k. ‐ Transportation Systems Division recommends approval of
Supplemental Agreement #1 to CAG‐10‐157, with Parametrix, Inc., in the Page 195 of 221
6k. ‐ Transportation Systems Division recommends approval of
Supplemental Agreement #1 to CAG‐10‐157, with Parametrix, Inc., in the Page 196 of 221
6k. ‐ Transportation Systems Division recommends approval of
Supplemental Agreement #1 to CAG‐10‐157, with Parametrix, Inc., in the Page 197 of 221
6k. ‐ Transportation Systems Division recommends approval of
Supplemental Agreement #1 to CAG‐10‐157, with Parametrix, Inc., in the Page 198 of 221
CITY OF RENTON COUNCIL AGENDA BILL
Subject/Title:
Final Pay Estimate – CAG-10-084
SWP-27-3146, 3350, Union Avenue NE/Duvall
Avenue NE Storm System Repair Project
Meeting:
Regular Council - 21 Mar 2011
Exhibits:
Pay Estimate #5 Final
Notice of Completion – Combined Form: Dept of
Revenue, Dept of L&I
Submitting Data: Dept/Div/Board:
Public Works
Staff Contact:
Ron Straka, x7248, Daniel Carey, x7293
Recommended Action:
Council Concur
Fiscal Impact:
Expenditure Required: $ 737.50 Transfer Amendment: $
Amount Budgeted: $ 500,000 Revenue Generated: $
Total Project Budget: $ 500,000 City Share Total Project: $
SUMMARY OF ACTION:
Hoffman Construction started construction on the project on August 24, 2010, and completed the
majority of the work on September 14, 2010. The project included installing 60 feet of new 24-inch
storm line on Union Avenue NE, and 83 feet of new 36-inch storm line on Duvall Avenue NE. The original
contract amount was $71,978.05 and the final contract amount is $98,389.64.
The increase of $26,411.59 was mainly from having to relocate a water main that was found conflicting
with the new 24-inch pipe in Union Avenue, and replacing an additional 14 feet of corroding 36-inch
CMP pipe in Duvall Avenue NE. The additional costs were included in
Change Order #1 and in increases in material quantities.
The project is funded by the Surface Water Utility’s Capital Improvement Program’s Small Drainage
Projects Program (account number 427.475015.018.595.38.63.000); $97,652.14 of the project costs was
paid for under the 2010 CIP budget. The approved 2011 CIP budget for the Small Drainage Projects
Program is $500,000.00. There is sufficient budget remaining in the approved 2011 CIP budget to fund
the final pay estimate and staff costs.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
Accept the Union Avenue NE/Duvall Avenue NE Storm System Repair Project, approve the final pay
estimate, and release the retainage of $4,919.48 after 60 days and after all the required releases from
the state have been obtained.
6l. ‐ Utility Systems Division submits CAG‐10‐084, Union Ave. NE/Duvall
Ave. NE Storm System Repair project; and requests approval of the
Page 199 of 221
6l. ‐ Utility Systems Division submits CAG‐10‐084, Union Ave. NE/Duvall
Ave. NE Storm System Repair project; and requests approval of the
Page 200 of 221
6l. ‐ Utility Systems Division submits CAG‐10‐084, Union Ave. NE/Duvall
Ave. NE Storm System Repair project; and requests approval of the
Page 201 of 221
6l. ‐ Utility Systems Division submits CAG‐10‐084, Union Ave. NE/Duvall
Ave. NE Storm System Repair project; and requests approval of the
Page 202 of 221
6l. ‐ Utility Systems Division submits CAG‐10‐084, Union Ave. NE/Duvall
Ave. NE Storm System Repair project; and requests approval of the
Page 203 of 221
6l. ‐ Utility Systems Division submits CAG‐10‐084, Union Ave. NE/Duvall
Ave. NE Storm System Repair project; and requests approval of the
Page 204 of 221
RESOLUTION NO.
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON DESIGNATING
CERTAIN EXPENDITURES FOR POTENTIAL REIMBURSEMENT FROM
BONDS OR OTHER OBLIGATIONS THAT MAY BE AUTHORIZED AND
APPROVED FOR ISSUANCE BY THE CITY IN THE FUTURE.
WHEREAS, the City of Renton, Washington (the "City") intends to issue tax-exempt
obligations from time to time for the purpose of financing its governmental activities; and
WHEREAS, the United States Department of the Treasury has promulgated Regulations
limiting the ability of the City to use the proceeds of tax-exempt obligations for reimbursement
of prior expenditures; and
WHEREAS, the Regulations require that a municipality declare its intent to issue tax-
exempt bonds to reimburse the municipality for prior expenditures before the expenditures
are incurred;
NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON, DOES
RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS:
Section I. Pursuant to U.S. Treasury Regulation Section 1.150-2(e), the City reasonably
expects to reimburse the expenditures described herein with the proceeds of bonds or other
obligations to be incurred by the City (the "Reimbursement Bonds").
Section II. The expenditures with respect to which the City reasonably expects to be
reimbursed from the proceeds of Reimbursement Bonds include the acquisition (including
land), construction, improvement, and equipping of library facilities.
Section III. The maximum principal amount of debt obligations expected to be issued
for the projects described in Section II is $18,000,000.
8a. ‐ Designating library facilities expenditures for potential
reimbursement from bonds (See 7.a.)Page 205 of 221
RESOLUTION NO.
Section IV. The adoption of this resolution shall not obligate the City to issue the bonds.
The issuance of the bonds shall require separate and additional official approval by the City
Council.
PASSED BY THE CITY COUNCIL this day of , 2011.
Bonnie I. Walton, City Clerk
APPROVED BY THE MAYOR this day of , 2011.
Approved as to form:
Lawrence J. Warren, City Attorney
Denis Law, Mayor
P:\20358_DG\20358_0PK 03/16/11 8a. ‐ Designating library facilities expenditures for potential
reimbursement from bonds (See 7.a.)Page 206 of 221
CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON
ORDINANCE NO.
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON, AMENDING THE CITY
OF RENTON FISCAL YEARS 2011/2012 BIENNIAL BUDGET AS ADOPTED BY
ORDINANCE NO. 5583, IN THE AMOUNT OF $30,891,197.
WHEREAS, on November 22, 2010, the City Council adopted Ordinance 5583 approving
the City of Renton's 2011/2012 Biennial Budget; and
WHEREAS, funds appropriated in 2010, but not expended in 2010 due to capital project
interruptions and delays in invoice payments, need to be carried forward and appropriated for
expenditure in 2011;
NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON, DOES
ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS:
SECTION I. Ordinance No. 5583 establishing the City of Renton's 2011/2012 Biennial
Budget is hereby amended in the total amount of $30,891,197.
SECTION II. Summary budget adjustments by fund for 2011 and 2012 are hereby
attached as Exhibits A and B, respectively. Detailed lists of adjustments are available for public
review in the Office of the City Clerk, Renton City Hall.
SECTION III. This ordinance shall be effective upon its passage, approval, and five (5)
days after publication.
PASSED BY THE CITY COUNCIL this day of , 2011.
Bonnie I. Walton, City Clerk
8a. ‐ 2011/2012 Budget amendment related to carrying forward 2010
funds (See 7.a.)Page 207 of 221
ORDINANCE NO.
APPROVED BY THE MAYOR this day of , 2011.
Approved as to form:
Lawrence J. Warren, City Attorney
ORD:1699:3/17/ll:scr
Denis Law, Mayor
8a. ‐ 2011/2012 Budget amendment related to carrying forward 2010
funds (See 7.a.)Page 208 of 221
ORDINANCE NO.
Exhibit A: 2011 Carry Forward Budget Adjustment Summary by Fund
2011 Carry Forward Budget Adjustment Request Analysis/Summary
BEGINNING FUND BALANCE I REVENUE EXPENDITURES END FUND BALANCE
Fund/
\oop::i3&^AABBBBAAAABAiBBABAi
'661 "'COMMUNITYSERVICES
• 003 STRffiTS ABBBB: 00
004 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANT -
:-^6AmsWMB'MBBBiiAABBBBBBBiBBB:BBBB
006 LIBRARY
' 009 ''FARMERSMRK|T: O:!:00
OIOFIREAND EMERGENCY SVC MEMORIAL
;6i1:' FIRE AND MERGENCYSVCHWLTH&weLl-NESS:
031 PARKMEMORIAL
OipiOO Oi 99?. LMGdeoNDs-crfy: HALLOOOO 0 0000000
215 GENERAL GOVERNMENT MISC DEBT SVC
:0OOfptal General GovernmentarFunds;"^ ; ,
01p2;0ARTB?W:^BE^SO: A
'108 LEASED CITY PROPERTIES
0:1 ;16;::sP6CKtOHbTa-«T6L 1MB "
118 CUM2755 (PATHS/TRAILS)
::B25i ONEFeRCENTFOR ART...0000
127 CABLE COMMUNICATIONS DEVaOPMENT
0:i 350:; SWlNGBI^OKWferLANDS HANK: 0 0
303 COMMUNITY SERVICES IMPACT MITIGATION
:;304: ;FIRE IMPACT MITIGATON1: :'B:BBBAA
305 TRANSPORTATION IMPACT MmGATION
OOsigOiMyNiGiRAL.FAciLOmEscp B-MB-MBAMAA
317 CAPFTAL IMPROVEMENT
:3i 8 VSOUTH LAKE WA' iNFWstRUcfURE TOJECT; 0;; 00:
326 HOUSING OPPORTUNITY
0 402:::X!RroW:QijSiA^^
403' SOLID WASTE UTILITY
: 404: MUNICIRALGOLF COURSESYSTEM; :: A\i
405 WATER OPERATIONS
406: VWSTEVWH^R 6P#!AjipNS
407 SURFACE WATER OPERATIONS
OSlOetOKiNQCoutto-MEiT^
422 AIRPORT CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT'
424: MUMCIB^ESOLF COURSE SYSTEMCIPOO:':: OSO'O.;; 0:
425 WATER CIP
; 426 OOwSOriAWESOpiFOO AABBBBBB
427 SURFACE WATER CIP
04?I;::ISA0I|I^R^
501 EQUIPMENT RENTAL
502 0 INSURANCE: :::
503 INFORMATION SERVICES
MAiiFB^MiMBBBBBBBAMBBBBBBBBiBi
505 COMMUNICATIONS
-SI'iOO'HKLTTiCARE INSURANCE 0:00:O0O0O
522 LEOFF1 RETIREES HEALTHCARE
..6ii:::F!Reyi\fS:Ffi«iON':::-s:00::0:0
. ..:Tptat:::C3itlie rOFurids;-;:::::1::: O"-.;:; ;:-:"-'0:;
.TOTAL:A|^; WNPS::::::::::;;:::::;::::::'::--:
2011 Budgeted
Beg Fund Bal
;;:;;: ;.9,49J;i?g?;
50,606
MBABtQfXiPi
(6,121)
OOOOOOOOOOOO-M.Zoe.;
-
BBiBBBiM&B:
936'
MAiBB0pPt
175,067
0000000000049:999:::
101,449
;,;;::..;::;;i 0,051,1:8?;;
;0':o;0::0:':0;;::02oo)e87::
995,638
BiBBB:W$py
3,264
00;:O:-0:0:;0:::1-26;796:0
88,718
:00:0-0000-0-A59S280;
1,126,594
::;-0;:::0:i.i9o3:B22:::
""'""""""""557O134"
0:O':0:000:8,4S5;3i:?:;:
1,060,648
ABBAAAyWi
1,653
:0:;:0;::0;::ii33:t;029p0
.,,,,,..,, ---2^034"
AMAZi4$p$;
4,050,493
BBBBBBBBMOB-i.
'{,590,108
iOoOOOOOOO.OO^Sos:
3790669"
0::;:::0:'0:::0;:135,024::
812,275
A-BBMMM--
-
00.0:0:0':-::00;^i6b4":
4,810,713""
:0;O;0::::0:5:i:56.,9870:
" '911,613''
BBBBBMoAW
283,929
0:;;0:;0:;0;3,988,:i0i.2-;0
2,807,251
:0;0:::;0::4,082,340.,
:: 43,31 8,850:
A 53,370,039
Changes
sOOOO (14,661:);
561,861"
0 0; 066,298O-
(49,110)
::0:::::0:0:;OOS;6240:::
47,347
000:011,689:
"315
OOO^O:':'1.9!7?9:-:
1,883"
Miiiz^A;
424,636
0:0:-li355i?3o::-::
S:A$Sfi6i)i
(236,044)'
MAi^fiyisy-
35"
O0::::0:O;O::08-i634;-;
82,640
S:OO:::26:6|9960O:
217,283
MBA?$?A
562,820'"
000:2;3Q3,?8600.
"2,747,432"
00000:0;$804S40:
162,134"
;:::;000:(36i254);;'
6350754
AiSMfiWii
644,623
0:000(496,285);::
(127,982)
ABM&imB
(313,356)
.;,.•:.: 122,656:0
1,252,363
OOOOOO^-'OOOOOjOO'OO
1,811,737
00000:0:0000:1-?900
482,394"
:;:0:':;l;'153.3lq37;:;;
""10637552"
;O:::;::O(229i463)0O
(213,715)
::OO:2O2l05;782-O:
563,786
0-:: :203,908::
15,697,517 ;
17,053,447;:;;
2011 Adjusted
Fund Bal
;;;;,:::?,477;;|48::
631,861"
A:y: 116,298
(55,231)
:::::;:::0::::0;::66,830
47,347
: ;:;:&i:B3b;
1,251
:::-::24,672:
176,950
0:0:0:00:0:31:2,938:
526,085
;;: 11,407,119:
Mi:.';. 171,720
"759,594
:;-0000:212,950
3,299
:OOl36,830:
171,358
'ABiBpeoiSiA-
1,343,877
:;::;0:0l ,929,4770
" lOl 19,954
0::::5,759;297:
3,808,080
HBA :;5&i522::
163,787
Mi O-i,295,036
961,788
:;::;:::639,924:
4,695,116
MMiWi&e-
1,462,126
O:::;: 67i,ei6
66,313
BM ."0:257,686::
2,064,638
OOOO-OOOOOOOOOoOOOOOO'O
1,811,737
BBBBBAMJP.
5,293,107
•::::;:::06,69O,O24:
1,949,165
;;:t;0;O0;;;;:24i.j646.
70,214
::::::6,201,894:
3,371,037
Mi 4,286 ;2480
; : 5?,016,367
A. 70,423,486:
2011 Budgeted
Revenue
:::0;:;:;:;;71",689,983;:0-
10,817,691""
: 8,391,801;;:
304,000
0 0 0-1950966 0
2,030,000
0:000:52i56oO
AAB 25,000"
:: :: i,933;o7;5 0
2,731,960
;>98,221,926
MMA20 fioo-..
744,933'
;:;,;: 2ASPOA
'-"
W::;::0f::::,:i5,666.:0
85,000
'BAB;.
60,000 "
,: IOO;OOQ-:
250,666
O:;::::::;; 13,310,000:
10,657,819
y-BA-:
'-'
00;oo:-:-:^636i2i4;;
"""'"" 15,0150942 "
;00 2,483,545::
9,680,689
• 4,896,139 0
5,155,153
:- ::13,IS60T:6O;0
2,803,204 '
OoyooOiioDiPbaj:
4,500,000
:0|:0000:3,796,66o0;:"
3,650,000
'BB'ABMAiiM
3,211,401"""
,; ;,; 3,178383 0:
:4,6290664''"
4,243,673;0;
953,941
OO'O Oil,248,058;:::
2,235,684
:;0:-;;::::::0.3660600;:0
;:.;.1.21,356i702.;::
;;:,;21.9,578,628-;0:
Changes
B;B:W:$M;i
11,800
:::::0:0::36,316;0
197,728"
%BMMM.
-
'"::.15;ppp;:;
BBB'B'A'
'"'"""""""-'
AAMMAB
-
;, 425,923;
' -
3,127
:-
-
00:0 ;17,666:
-
- -:
-
AAABAA
-'
63B osss::
13,637,482
AAAABB
"'-'
:;::;:;0(2p4,2O4)0
-
:;:;;;;;;;;;;;.:;;0:::,
-
MBBiSpaA
198,780
-.;;-;-:.;.;-:;,:...;
630,204
BBMBBAAB
" 497361"
00'000:05S;66pOO
'1,045,674
AABB-B:'4
BAMMA
89,387
MMMMA
-
BiBBBBBBBiB:
"700,060
O'OOOOOOOOOOO-OOsOO
;; 17,343,309;;:
:;;1.7769:,232: ••
2011 Adjusted
Revenue
0;:;:;:;/0i:,88;1:;OJ-2".
10,829,491
:00:::0:8;4O2;i:i:7::
501,728
::;::-:;;:0;'i9^966O
2,030,000
00:0000:00067,500
-
0:;000:0;:0:25,OOO:
:;::-•:0=:-i-,o83,pre;:
2,731,960
98,647,84?
00;:;;::::;626,o6o
748,060
-','•• .0 245,000:
"-
::::::-:--0:;:::;320opO
85,000
;;;;".;:;::;;;::;;i;;.::;.:;;_;.::.-:..;;_
60,000
: 100,000;
250,000
:::::0;i3;948,5580
24,295,301
;:;.;;;;.. .;;;;,
'-
;; :432;,ai:o::
15,015,942
,0 2,483:545:
9,680,689
; 0:04:93i:,l3e::
5,353,933
00:;;:13,1560786:
3,433,468
000;.::0:';;Oi.OO',6Bo:-
"4,997,301
;000::003,845,o66:
4,695,674
AiiBiBMBM
3,211,401
;O0j-:;3,178,883;
4,119,051
BA 4,243,673
953,941
:::-;:Oi:i:,2480p58o:
2,935,684
::00-:00:0;30O;6PQ:':
;: 138,700,011
:237,347i860:;
2011 Budgeted
Expenditure
.0:;:;:;;:7,2,568,e2i;;:0
l6',742'0'324""
AAs'29MAAi
"304,060
0::0:::;:.00208:140j'00:
2,030,000
BBBBBBiAtMA.:
0-000:0:0::0::?5,pp0;;:;
'""-"'
MBM&tej&tSB
2,731,960
,981,934,407:
:;:0:::062p,pOp;;0
61'4,4'57'
A;Ay:245:PpP:iy
OOOOOi-OOssSpo;:
'" "'85,674
ri"B-AABB\
466,066"
:::000:::000:529,O5e:0:
499,494"'
0; O^-'O-W •662,606';:-;
11,647,819
BBBBAMBBBA:
'-'
;0:;:;: ;0:1,125;7560:;:0
" "14,951,71"6 ""
:;0:;::;0;:2,5O4,738;0:
10,107,179
BABAMi^23ii
4,865,850
;0;i|::;:l30i:56S6d::|
2,803,204'
SOOsSOsOfOOpPp:;;
'"""4,5660006
:0O0:00:0S0J09P;666:00
3,650,000
AMMM-B-i:B
3,195,267"
:;00:0 03:293,564;;:;
4,513,461 "
::0:0::00::4i256;26i00
957,746
0::00:0:lOO,844,696 0;
2,261,732
O^SsOSxSpS^s:::::
;,;::125;9 28,829,,
0:224;863,236;
Changes
;::;;:1,627,335,;::
'48,491"'
:AA0:A2O:iy
66,272
OO-O;;:*::
O0O:0:O0:'-:i;5,666::0
-
AABBBBBA
-"
OOOOOOOOOOOOOOtOO^O:
;:,:;i:i76405l.8::::
:..AAAB. :-:
OOOOOOOOOpOvOoo;;;
"" -
0:0:000:OP02S?0
"135,627
AA'AABBi-
:BBBBBBAM:
566,666"
:::0;4;3l90499000
16,359,981
000000005806660:0
'"""i6'6',666"
:0;:0:::"00:0--:0;0::0-0
:;;:;:;::;;:0;000O:0;00::-0
414,134
OOOoOOappOsM?
226,763
:00:::0:0:0000:0:0;-:::'::0-0
200,317
0;:::;:0;:i2o;opo;:;
1,567,301'"
iBBi'AAA
2,650,000
'0;O'::-:'::;OO:0:^00:-0
1,212,070'
:00:0(27506o6j::
"1,119,846 "
0000000:000:00.010
000::;000000000--f.
" -'
'MyAAiWi
29,126,679 :
30,891,197;::
2011 Adjusted
Expenditure
;:;:::;:::74,195,956
1'0','79'6,615
;;O0OO;O:803P6,564;
"'" 370,272'
000::0000:0:0268046|'
2,030,000
000100000:062,8750:
;;:';:0'00;:00;0:0?50poo::
BAMi$&,V?A
'2,731,960
;:;;::::iOOi6??,?250
:;000000::!:626,PPO;;
614,457'
'00:Oooo:oO:0:2?g,p6:po
BBBBB^M'i.
'221,301
000000 OKOOKOO'O:-?-:-
'400,606'
'AM- 0529:,p5.6:'
999,494
0:0:0:19,281,499
28,007,800
0'0:0000000::580pp6;
166,666'
BBBBiMMs®:
"14,951,710
0::::O0:0-2O5d473.80:
10,521,313
BBiiB^BABiBMi.
5,092,613
00000;i?,:i'0560766::
3,663,521
00::000;0:0:22o;ooo:
60067,361
N:||:;Si769i666;0
6,300,000
BBiBByBBBBA
40407,337"
Mii'AMstPf
5,633,367
BiiBAzS&siy
957,746
:::::0:::io1644,696:
2,26i,732
OO:;::;:::::;1565,475;
155,065,508
,;: :255,754,433:
Ending Fund
Balance
:::-:7il;02,2p3;:;;;
670,477"
;:0;:;:0;:2l7j85i:;00
76,225 "
0:0:000;:54r389:::::
47,347
?:OiO:OO:0::8SO255;0;
"-"^25 A
0;00:000;024i672.0O
176,956"
0:0:0::0:Sl2,938::::
526,085
0;::0;9j356-iO43;;::
BBBMMWB
893,197
MM&$?QiB
""""' 3,299
B:iyiiipp,5ipB
35,057
:0:::0O00686;524;O
1,003,877 "
:::';.000i0,566,42i::::::
370,460
0S00::004M3560:
95,581
0:00000::00000522:00
'30787 "
;.:0:0o'0:60i ,29.1:00:
1,626,626"
;0:;:::::::.:6p9,73:i;::0:
30854,492
01000:04?6,94200-
1,723,446"
0:00:0::67i:,ei.6:0:
49'6,2'6'6"
Am 37,6860:0
994,638
56,000:
207,411
:-0000;:00"i5,773::o-
4 ,'697,171
0o006,85p,343:0::
434969
:0000000228,458:;:
66,409
:::0:::6,665;256;;:,
4,044,989
:00;0:4,020.;7730;::
42,660,870
;: 52,016,913::
Reserved/ Available Fund
Designated
;;;;0(i,544,9§4)0;;::
(47,347)
" "(176,950)""
;;;::;(1,76?i25i)0-:;
0;:;0:;::;0(1:i:2.i576j;'O;
"::(466,6660)"
;:::0;0:::::(6o9r?3:t).0;;
(2,509,634)
;000-{i:,6620566)0;00
"" (818,085)
0'::0;Oo:0(386:;Opp)0;:;:
'Bii:@M$ppPYB
;:;0:::(3;253;469>;00
(678,520)
A (40626,773); ;
;:(19,170,231):;
: (20,939,48?) :;0
Balance
;; ::5,617,249:
670,477
O:;:: 21.7,851:
76,225'
ooo' 054,389::
-
0O0-:-O: 86,255:
1,251"
:;;;0:::o;0;:24,p72
-
O0:::::;:::-3:i.2i?38'-
"526,085
O;; 7,586,792
y:::* i7i,72oo
"" '893,197
[M 182,950
3,299
0;0:::ooi6o:,673:
35,057
0:;::0:::;OP6P;,524
1,003,877
00 01,560,421:
370,460
0 ;0:0'4260356;
95,581
0:;:0;::000000522
3,787
O00000:468,7l5:
626,020
':AA-y'y:y'- '
1,344,859
0:000:(59i0563)
905,361
:;;:;:;:::0291,616;
496,200
:: ; 137,68C3L;
994,638
0:0055,666:
207,411
'00;:O:;0::i5O773
"4,0970171
::: :;:i:,525,343.
434,909
0:0 0228,458
66,409
OOOOS ,3510847;
3,366,470
A-B-ABM
;23,490,$39
31,077,431:
8
a
.
‐
2
0
1
1
/
2
0
1
2
B
u
d
g
e
t
a
m
e
n
d
m
e
n
t
r
e
l
a
t
e
d
t
o
c
a
r
r
y
i
n
g
f
o
r
w
a
r
d
2
0
1
0
f
u
n
d
s
(
S
e
e
7
.
a
.
)
P
a
g
e
2
0
9
o
f
2
2
1
ORDINANCE NO.
Exhibit B: 2012 Carry Forward Budget Adjustment Summary by Fund
2012 Carry Forward Budget Adjustment Request Analysis/Summary
BEGINNING FUND BALANCE REVENUE EXPENDITURES END FUND BALANCE
Fund/
^OOOiOrtBWL::;:;:;;;::;
001 COMMUNITY SERVICES
ooai-sr^MMBBBBiiiBBBiBBBMBBBBBMBBB:
004 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANT
'oo5;wwmiBiBBBBBiBiBBi'BBB:;'BBBBBBBBi
006 LIBRARY
:"6O90::FARM!RS':MA RKET:::0;0:00000;'0:!-0
010 FIRE AND EMERGENCY SVC MEMORIAL
"pli:::; RREAON^MRSIW ^
031 PARKMEMORIAL
::2p.10:i097:;LM MSpps-crfY HALLOO-OO^O
215 GENERA L GOVERNMENT MISC DEBT SVC
Total General Governmental Punds ::
:;:i62;:;ARTERiAL:STR6Ets : -
108 LEASED CITY PROPERTIES
:;11 P::SPECWLHOTH^MSTELTAX : •:
"118 CUM2755(PATHSrrRAILS)
OOIHOONE p£Rcro;FOR:ART;:;:::::;;::::;;;0;:00:
127 CABLE'COMMUNICATIONS DEVELOPMENT
00l35008fWBpRO6K:WETtoNDs;M^
303 'COMMUNITY SERVICES IMPACT MmGATION
:3P4;:l=iRe.lMl%Ci;:i*fJGAT!0N: O;:;:
305 TRANSPORTATION IMPACT MmGATION
OSIPOOMUNICII^LOFACIL^
317 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT
0:31S-SOUfH tAKiWiAOINFRA STRUCtUR|WOJECT:00000
326 HOUSING OPPORTUNITY
04.O2:0A IRTOMOPERATIONSO A
403 SOLID WASTE UTILITY
: 4040,MUNICIRAL:G6iiF:C0URSESYSTEM;:;:|;
405 WATER OPERATIONS
iW8Mt<&tmB%miorB^
407 SURFACE WATER OPERATIONS
:4160KINGPduNtYOMETRO:: 0
422 AIRPORT CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT
424 O.MUNlCpA:L:GO!-F:COURSE SyOSTBMCiP -Aii
425 WATERCIP
- 0426 o^sfteAtoKpfeOOOOOOo:-: MB
427 SURFACE WATER C1P
:047lO:y%i|F!yyORKS RATESTABItlZATIGN;:-;,
501 EQUIPMENT RENTAL
':;:502; .lNSUi%NCE::;:.;;;:0O:;:;::-O';:
503 INFORMATION SERVICES
::5640:FAClLm6s:;.:0;:;000:oOO:0'00-0::
"565" COMMUNICATIONS
0612 0;HEA;LTHCARe INSURANCE; ABB
522 LE0FF1 RETIREES HEALTHCARE
;'6i-i;0FiR^ENs:r^»N'000O000O00O0O0000OOO:000:O:00000O0000000
Tota 1 ;pther::Funa'sO::::::::000:;:::.;':
TOTAL ALLTONPS;:;::,:'V:--:
2012 Budgeted
Beg Fund Bal
;;;8;613,120
125,366
;;0:00;0;::;i 480657.::
(6,121)
ABBBBBWjes;
-
M 75,166 ;
936
BMABM^pM
175,067
:OO:;o:oO:O;:0O4?,699::::
1010449
::::::; 9,338,707;
::;;0;0:::yOO::26poe8;7:.00
1,126,113
::;;;:;:0:;:;0::0:2470S28":0
3,264"'
BMBiBB??.^::'.
'" 88,044
00::::0:0;::;:;0459;528::'
7860594"
- 1,474,466:;
307,640
BBiAfitefitiB
70,648"
BBBBBBBAMeB
1,653
AAA$Affl$A
390,266
;00::::0:::::000::693794O.O
3,624,003
BBM110242,112 0;
1,879,411
BMBBAS;SoM
379,669
MBB^fiMB
812,275
BB:BMBi-y
-
B.BMM^Aik
'4,826,847
'ABB:i5iP42$0&::y
"""""':"""""427,8'i"6"":
AA':\^PjSBm
280,124
;0-:00;:;:4i389,4740:;-
2,781,203"
0:00:;.OO3,8;i:ei865O:
Mi 038,746,723 ;:
:: 48,085,430;:;
Changes
::(i:,45p,9i7):
545,111"
:0;0000;69,194;:0:
82,346
:: BA$2AB
47,347
:;:::i:i0O8900
315
iMMsjim:
1,883
M: 262,9390:0
424,636"
-:-».:;:::17:;336::::
0:;0:,o:::(28;0967);0
"(232,916)'
'Mi (64,878)00
35
BAiMlMi
(52,987)
r:: 200,996:;
'""217,283""
::::-::::-:::25;955:00
62,820
MWMM.
24,933
BBBM^SAB.
2,134
::::oo:(24p,458)0
"635,754
MB (84,063)0
230,489
000(707i:;:i70)0
(155,965)
00:0:825,1:1'1'00:
'116,531
AAM^B;
182,363
0 55,000:::
"207,411 "
BiBA'AWB
"(729,676)"
;;Ol;:,808,037'.:'
"""""7,093"
:,: (229,403)0:
(213,715)
:'-;2:;21:S:?82.0:0
' 1,263786
000263,968::
:;;3,91:4,147 ;
; 3,931,483:;
2012 Adjusted
Fund Bal
::;:;:;;;;;7ii:62,2p3
670,477
:;;000000,:21'7;85:i0
76,225
00-;-O00O0::S4,389:
47,347
00-000:0::?:#6,288
1,251
OOOOOOOOOOOz*,?./?:
176,950
OOOOOOOOM-?,^-:
526,085'
AH': 9,356,043
Bi'BA BMM
893,197
iAi.;.;i 182,950
3,299
BBB 100,573;
"""'""""'35 O657"
'M'B 660,524
""" 1,663,877
-;0:00;;lO,5QO;42:i.':
"' 370,460
:000:::::004260356;:
95,581
WBM-BAS&;]
3,787
'Bi A:fip^iiSl
1,026,020
:::o::o:0000:609,73i
3,854,492
0:0;;:00:004?6,942-.
1,723,446
ooo:0o0:0:067i,6.i6o
496,200
AAistfiao
994,638
;0:::::000::0:;;55,ppo
""""267,41 i"
BBBiBBiSjls.
"4,097,1 w
::;:::;6085O,343
"""""":"4:'340'969
;::,:;;;;::;':;228i458
'66,469
ABSiS0S,256
4,044,989
0 4,0026-773
;; 42,660,870
;0:::52,O16,91;3
2012 Budgeted chanaes 2012 Adjusted
Revenue
AABWl&M2A-yiM:ii
11,149,285
:0000;;:8,6029,e64:-00::00000:
304,000"
'BBABBM^B^iMBiBi
1,030,000
iB'BiAB'^°fi°PiBBBBB
BMBBBispmMBBBB
-'""""
:0000:0000l:,982,O75-.O::0-::-::':':
"3,749,298"
100,083,554 •'.-:
::: 63O06O60, ..
971,049
::::0:;;;;0;;265,OOO00;:;:::0;0;::
-
MBBB:\5iPppBBA:A.
""""' '85,6o6""""""""""'
AABAAABBABiB
""""""""' 660666""
:0.::-;0.:0::::Oi:PP06660:0::-;i:V::0:;;:
150,000" "'
00:;:0f0006056o0666:0-:000:'::-;00;:
9,711,400
'iBBABAAAAA-B
-
0 ::0:562O687;
15,004,692
0;:o:00::2,483,5450:000:00:000
'1'1,106,460
-:0;00000050i653,5-T4000:000000000:
5,469,223
''BiBiii3i2p3^B7:A'BBA
"""4,574,534 "
ABAWPpooiiiAA
""5,2"66,'o6o"""""""""""
'O.0;;0:0:03:,25p,6:op;;0:;.;;.-::0;0:::::
3,566,660
'A'iA-AyiAAA'BB.
3,079,893
MBAWy593 iAyBii
"""""" 4,118,173 "::"""""""""
;:ooo:.o..o04;324,987;:;:;0:-;:;o;:-:oo
"974367 ""'
0 0;:::;l2iPi4,224::::;0:0:::::;:;00
2,235,684
000:000600,06600.0:0.00:00:;
::;;;l2i,p96,362:-:;-00;:;:0000;:;
::;221,159,916;: AA.i.
Revenue
AiiiA'A'i^M^ii2i
11,149,285
MBAiMBpi^isMt
304,000
:0:000000000::0O':0:0:02160226;
1,030,000
0:::0:0::00:0:0;0000:;0:-000066,56p:;
00.0::00000:0:0::0:0:000:250ppp0
""-"""'
BBiMMAi, 982,0750
3,749,298
A-": : 100,063,554
v::;:;: OOOOO000:: 63p,poo-
'" 971,049"
::::::0:'::000:0;;:;Oi;0-.;265,pPpO
::00::00::0:00:00::0000:0::0!M?o::
"'85,666
MMBBM'B^A: A-A-:'i
66,606
MBBAiABB:AspBxsP;
150,000
AMBMB-^fiB^t.
9,711,400
: : -":;::
.
•OOOOOOOOOO": 562;637;
15,004,692
~MBMBAiB:M&&'&:
'11,106,460
000000:508530674::
'50469,223
:::00::;000000::"-i03i2690:387:
4,574,534
OOO 10O,0pP;
5,260,666
00000000:0;0;::0;::003!250i6p6;
3,566,666
i BB
3,079,893
00:™:::;;0;0-::3,167,S93:
----•••••••-•"••••---•^••y--
::O00':0::i::0::::0::::::;:;4O324i987;
"974,307
:;i2;Pi4,224
2,235,684
0000000:00:00:00:0:0366,660:
;;;^;0;::::;::::0;121,p9.6,362.
::-:::-:'::::'::::;;.:;22l;,i:59,9l.6-
2012 Budgeted Channp<! 2012 Adjusted
Expenditure
;:;::--;;::;72,387,839:;;::;;;:;:;;s:
'11,069,028
%AB$i^AyiGA\yA:
304,000
O:0:;0:;:0:::00::2i:6i562;:::;0:o:o:::::"::
1,030,000
.:::o:::o::000:::0:::::49,i5o::::::;o::
-
ABBBBBiM°^9 B
MMB^fisziffmiBiiBBiii
3,749,298
;.:'.: ;-0:99,348,329;0:::0:;0:00;:::
'0;;00:0;;;|::.'63p,ppo::::0;000:000000
8760232"""""""""""'""
::0:;.;0:0:0o0:0-0:265\o6p;;;000:::0:::::::0:
:::0::':0;0:00;0000:0:56:6o6;:;;-;-;::::0:0-:'0
""""'"" 85,674""'"'"'"'
"AABAB-i'BA^AvA-
-
536,926 ::
400,000
OOO: 0 0 S,&7;Oid06oO::: :;
9,761,400
BByAiB'BBiBBBBBAiiyB:
_
MBByi'itefii&ASMM
14,972,362"
00:0000:0:020542;2p40::o0:0;0:0:000
'10,362,480
;::o:00:;::o:0:4080i:7,627::ooo0;:::::::::;.::
'""4,941,632""'""""
0::oo:o:;o:i3:,2p9;387':::::o:o::::::o::o:
4,954,203
;0;;.::':;0-00.0-:0l06p,OOp::;:0:;:000;::0::::
5,2060606 "'""
::0:00:;:0::.;03:,256j6PP::o::::::;0:::::00
3,5o'o,o66
;.'•;-;: .ABBABAB
2,535,156"
::;::0:00O;0:2,?3p,679:-00::0O00000:0
4,409,226" "'""'
'00'0:0o:;0::4;379i434o:':o::::::;'::K:
991,015"
0 0:;::-::i:10,996,7390;0::;:0::::::0:
2,2620573" """"
'0:;::00;:00:::006Sp,475:00::00;::00:0000
:;:0:;:::;12p,583,67l0:;:;;;::0:::;;00:::
::::219j932,000 y;;;;
Expenditure
;;.::72i387,839:
11,069,028
BBMBi 8,5360436:
304,000
::; ;21;5,502::
1,030,000
:::::::;:00:;::0;:0490156:
.
:00000::::::0;0:25,0pp.
:0':000i0;.:0;00:i0982;675-:
" "3,749,298"
::;:-^:0;:;.::00;;;::0099,348,329,
:'.;:0,00':::::-::000:00000::636jOo6;:
876,2'32
:::::0:0o00;0::;0;::;:0::0:;.:265,po6;
:::;05o,poo:
"''""850674
:: ^i-BB
A:AiBiiB:BB.S3PiS2p
400,000
0000::;:0000000:0:00008:,97p;p6p:
90761,400
::*::::::
00000: :0:0:0000:'00:000:i 01:63:8460
14,972,362
'i.BBBBBM^&&2W
10,302,480
BABBAM4&?fim
4,941,632
-:::; 0;0:i3.;269,387O
4,954,203
::::::0::0000::::;:0000::00::'ioo,opp::
5,20O,0'6o
'::::o:3025pflpp
3,560,006
yA.y'y:i::'y:AiBBBB'BiB
20535,156"
i|i|::;0;::0;;;::::i:::::|2093p;679;
4,469,226
..: 4,379,434:
"" "991,6l5
;:;0:;:;0:::0:;00000:-11;996i7390
'" "2,262,573
OOOOOOOO^OOOOOOOOOOO-SSo^S'
::>;:: 0;::;;::;i:2p,583,671;:
- ;; 219,932,000;
Ending Fund
Balance
: :;;:7,692,475
750,734
• 3:ip;479 0
76,225
:":0.000:65il970::
47,347
0; ;;0;:0 907,605;
1,251
0;::;:0::0:::24,p72;0
176,950
•OO0:0::-a!2,9380:0
"" 526,085
;:::i;0,071,268:;
MBiiW^ipB
988,614"
BA 182,950";
"'" 3,299'""
:;::::;::::::;::65,573:::::
34,383"
:;066p;524::::
1,663,877"
:0:::001,p63;496;:;
'126,460
000000::00i6035'6.0;:
"45,581
0:0000;00;00:0:52200:
60787
:000000000|::00;8200:
1,058,349
BBB^iPWi:
'"4,658,472 '
:::i:::i:,806,889:::
2,251,037
MB 6710616:
116,531
0;;0:000::137i68PO;:
994,638 "'
'A;AssjpopB
207,411"
:O:::o0o;0:O::i:5:,773:o::
40641,968
BBWMJSST'B
'"""""" 143,856'""
: 174,011
'49,701 '"
::0:;:06,622:,74i::;0
" 4,618,100
BiHMBo:MMi
043,173,562 ;;
;53,244,829 ;
Reserved/
Designated
::;:;;(1;544,954)::
(47,347)
(176,950)
• :{1i769,251):;
;;00OO0(:i:0l:6i385)-::
(400,000)
O$::O.:?^650i-i671}.:;
''(2,492,127)
OgOOfl,636,570):;:
"(806,007)
O0:;;f:(386.,'ppo}:o
:-:;;;(50325,oo6):o
;;::;(3,699;022)::
": (678,772)
•\fflffiaj&B)B
::;:(19,155,25:1);:
:(20,924i502:):;
Available Fund
Balance
::-::: 6,147,521;
750,734
MB. 310,479;
760225
E000-00550l07:
_
:00"0;000;970605::
1,251
0:0O00-000:24,672::
_
O:0:OO:::312,938-
526,085
:::: 8,302,017
:o:o:::ooo:i7i,72p:
988,014
;:,.':'; 182,950
""'"""""""""""""""3,299'
; 65,573
34,383
:•:•:•• ::660,524-
" "i,063,877
;::0::;:i;0663;,495
120,460
::;;::;:;00'0'i6;356;
45,581
00v ;622--
3,787
oO;0:o:(ii603p3)
658,349
•: :::-: 'iy
"2,166,345
BM. 0:4700319
1,445,031
0:0:000:0029106i-6:
'116,531
BMB1;3 7,680
994,638
-0:0"•! 55,000;
"'"207,411"
:0;000::-'::::0:i5-,773:
4,6'4l,908
BHiiM 82,857.
143,856
::;vO-V;174iOH.:
'"""""""49,761
:::.•: 03,623,719::
3,339,328
-
24,018,310;
; :32;320,327:
8
a
.
‐
2
0
1
1
/
2
0
1
2
B
u
d
g
e
t
a
m
e
n
d
m
e
n
t
r
e
l
a
t
e
d
t
o
c
a
r
r
y
i
n
g
f
o
r
w
a
r
d
2
0
1
0
f
u
n
d
s
(
S
e
e
7
.
a
.
)
P
a
g
e
2
1
0
o
f
2
2
1
CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON
ORDINANCE NO.
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON, AMENDING TITLE IX,
(PUBLIC WAYS AND PROPERTY) OF ORDINANCE NO. 4260 ENTITLED "CODE OF
GENERAL ORDINANCES OF THE CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON", BY ADDING A
NEW CHAPTER 17, ENTITLED "ENCROACHMENTS ON PUBLIC PROPERTY",
ESTABLISHING THE POLICY OF PREVENTION OF ENCROACHMENTS ON PUBLIC
PROPERTY, ESTABLISHING AN APPEAL PROCEDURE FOR ENCROACHMENT
VIOLATION NOTICES, LEVYING COSTS TO RESOLVE, REMOVE OR CORRECT AN
ENCROACHMENT, ESTABLISHING DAMAGES AND VALUE OF USE FOR AN
ENCROACHMENT, ALLOWING FOR USE PERMITS FOR PUBLIC PROPERTY,
DECLARING AN ENCROACHMENT AS A NUISANCE. AND ESTABLISHING THAT AN
ENCROACHMENT VIOLATION MAY BE AN INFRACTION OR MISDEMEANOR.
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON, DOES ORDAIN AS
FOLLOWS:
SECTION I. Title IX (Public Ways and Property) of Ordinance No. 4260 entitled "Code
of General Ordinances of the City of Renton, Washington", is hereby amended to add a new
chapter 17, entitled "Encroachments on Public Property", to read as follows:
CHAPTER 17
ENCROACHMENTS ON PUBLIC PROPERTY
SECTION:
9-17-1
9-17-2
9-17-3
9-17-4
9-17-5
9-17-6
9-17-7
9-17-8
9-17-9
9-17-1
Policy
Definitions
Procedure
Appeals
Boundary Disputes
Costs to Resolve, Remove or Correct
Damages and Value of Use
Public Propertv Use Permit
Nuisance
D: Infraction and Misdemeanor
8a. ‐ Amending City Code regarding encroachments on public property
(1st reading 3/14/2011)Page 211 of 221
ORDINANCE NO.
9-17-1 POLICY:
It is the policy of the City of Renton that no person shall make unauthorized
use of public lands. Any encroachment on, to, under, over, or modification of
City owned, managed, maintained or leased lands including park, natural area or
open space property, public buildings or rights-of-way will be deemed
trespassing regardless of when the property was initially encroached upon. The
violator(s) of such encroachment shall be notified and directed to remove any
and all encroachments to the land not previously approved in writing by the City,
to restore the land to its original condition and provide maintenance for three
(3) years following restoration-
It is the policy of the City of Renton to resolve all encroachments in a fair and
equitable manner, in the manner most beneficial and to work with and assist
encroaching parties to remove the encroachment(s).
9-17-2 DEFINITIONS:
EASEMENTS: A limited right to make use of a property owned by another, such
as a right-of-way across the property.
EMERGENCY: An occasion when property or life is at risk.
ENCROACHMENT: An incursion onto public lands including, but not limited to,
clearing, grading, gardening, landscaping, installing structures, constructing,
storing, placing, dumping, maintaining, cutting, overhanging, excavating, parking,
diverting, destabilizing, draining onto, defacing, damaging, mutilating, removing,
and limiting access onto.
8a. ‐ Amending City Code regarding encroachments on public property
(1st reading 3/14/2011)Page 212 of 221
ORDINANCE NO.
ENCROACHMENT VIOLATION NOTICE: A letter prepared by the Code Compliance
division and addressed to the property owner who encroaches upon public lands
or public right-of-way that defines the encroachment and stipulates the
conditions and requirements for removing the encroachment.
LIEN AGAINST PROPERTY: A claim or charge made against property.
PUBLIC LANDS: Property owned by the City of Renton and property in which
Renton has an easement or interest. Examples include parks, natural areas, fire
stations, libraries and sidewalks. For purposes of this ordinance, rights-of-way
will be dealt with in the right-of-way use permit ordinance.
UNAUTHORIZED USE: A use not permitted by the City.
9-17-3 PROCEDURE:
A. Identification of Encroachments:
1. Upon discovery that an unauthorized encroachment has occurred,
City staff shall attempt to contact, in person, the property owner encroaching
upon public property, identify the encroachment circumstances to the property
owner, offer suggestions for removing the encroachment on an informal basis
and work with that owner to have the encroachment removed and the area
restored.
2. If the encroachment is not successfully removed. City staff shall
review the encroachment with the City Attorney before recommending an
appropriate action to the Mayor or his or her designee.
8a. ‐ Amending City Code regarding encroachments on public property
(1st reading 3/14/2011)Page 213 of 221
ORDINANCE NO.
3. Removal of Encroachment Notification. If it is determined that an
encroachment requires removal and restoration, the encroaching party shall be
mailed an Encroachment Violation Notice that identifies and directs removal and
restoration of the unauthorized encroachment within thirty (30) days.
B. Failure to Comply:
1. If the encroaching party fails to comply with the Encroachment
Violation Notice, a second Encroachment Violation Notice shall be sent "Return
Receipt Requested". The Notice shall indicate "Second Attempt" and provide for
a thirty (30)-day response to the removal and restoration of the encroachment.
2. If the encroaching party fails to comply with the second written
notice, the City may remove the unauthorized encroachment and restore the
property to its original condition. The cost of such action may be charged to the
encroaching party.
9-17-4 APPEALS:
Individuals may appeal an Encroachment Violation Notice to the Community
Services Administrator or designee, who will issue a written decision based on
the City file and the contents of the appeal. Any appeal must be in writing and
received within thirty (30) days of receipt of the Encroachment Violation Notice.
9-17-5 BOUNDARY DISPUTES:
In the event that the property boundary is disputed, the property owner
mav, at the owner's expense, commission a boundary survey by a licensed and
8a. ‐ Amending City Code regarding encroachments on public property
(1st reading 3/14/2011)Page 214 of 221
ORDINANCE NO.
qualified surveyor. If there is a bona fide dispute as to the boundary, the City
shall wait a reasonable time for the survey to be completed.
9-17-6 COSTS TO RESOLVE, REMOVE OR CORRECT:
Costs to resolve or correct unauthorized encroachments will be charged to
the party encroaching upon public lands. Such costs may include, but are not
limited to, boundary surveys, construction permit fees, engineering or
architectural fees, contracts. City staff time, demolition, lien applications,
removal, restoration, three (3)-year maintenance costs, legal fees, and accrued
interest if payment is not received within thirty (30) days of invoicing. Such costs
shall be a lien against the encroaching party's real estate.
9-17-7 DAMAGES AND VALUE OF USE:
In addition to the costs to resolve or correct the encroachment, the
encroaching party shall be liable for any damage to City property and shall be
liable for the value of the use of the City property encroached upon, at the rate
of one percent (1%) per month of the fair market value of the encroached
property or fifty dollars ($50) per month, whichever is greater.
9-17-8 PUBLIC PROPERTY USE PERMIT:
When not prohibited by grant funding conditions tied to acquisition,
restrictive covenants or applicable law, rules and regulations and upon a finding
that the City has no foreseeable use or need for the property encroached upon,
the encroaching party may make application for a revocable permit to use and
occupy the public property. The application for the permit must be made to the
8a. ‐ Amending City Code regarding encroachments on public property
(1st reading 3/14/2011)Page 215 of 221
ORDINANCE NO.
Mayor or his or her designee, legally describing the property to be used and the
purpose of such use. The minimum permit requirements are described in RMC
9-2-3. There shall be a fee for such permit as established by RMC 4-1-180E.
Before any permit can be issued, a fee for the duration of the encroachment
must be paid at the rate set by RMC 4-1-180E.
9-17-9 NUISANCE:
Any encroachment on City property is hereby declared a nuisance, which can
be abated by court order or under Section 1-3-3 of this Code.
9-17-10 INFRACTION AND MISDEMEANOR:
After receipt of an Encroachment Violation Notice and second Encroachment
Violation Notice, one who continues, intensifies or expands such encroachment
shall be issued a Notice of Infraction. After one (1) found infraction, a party
continuing an encroachment shall be guilty of a misdemeanor punishable
pursuant to RMC 1-3-1.
SECTION II. This ordinance shall be effective upon its passage, approval, and thirty
(30) days after publication.
PASSED BY THE CITY COUNCIL this day of , 2011.
Bonnie I. Walton, City Clerk
APPROVED BY THE MAYOR this day of , 2011.
Denis Law, Mayor
8a. ‐ Amending City Code regarding encroachments on public property
(1st reading 3/14/2011)Page 216 of 221
ORDINANCE NO.
Approved as to form:
Lawrence J. Warren, City Attorney
Date of Publication:
ORD:1641:2/16/ll:scr
8a. ‐ Amending City Code regarding encroachments on public property
(1st reading 3/14/2011)Page 217 of 221
CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON
ORDINANCE NO.
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON, AMENDING
SUBSECTIONS 4-1-160D, FEE CALCULATIONS, AND 4-1-160J, ADOPTION OF THE
DISTRICT CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN AND SUBMISSION OF THE ANNUAL
UPDATES AND REPORT AND DATA, OF CHAPTER 1, ADMINISTRATION AND
ENFORCEMENT, OF TITLE IV (DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS) OF ORDINANCE
NO. 4260 ENTITLED "CODE OF GENERAL ORDINANCES OF THE CITY OF RENTON,
WASHINGTON", SETTING THE IMPACT FEE AT $3,808 PER NEW SINGLE-FAMILY
HOME IN THE ISSAQUAH SCHOOL DISTRICT; SETTING THE IMPACT FEE AT
$5,486 PER NEW SINGLE FAMILY HOME AND $3,378 PER NEW MULTI-FAMILY
UNIT IN THE KENT SCHOOL DISTRICT; RETAINING THE IMPACT FEE AT $6,310
PER NEW SINGLE FAMILY HOME AND $1,258 PER NEW MULTI-FAMILY UNIT IN
THE RENTON SCHOOL DISTRICT; AND ADOPTING THE CAPITAL FACILITIES
PLANS OF THE ISSAQUAH AND KENT SCHOOL DISTRICTS WITHIN THE CITY OF
RENTON.
WHEREAS, under Section 4-1-160 of Chapter 1, Administration and Enforcement, of
Title IV (Development Regulations), of Ordinance No. 4260 entitled "Code of General
Ordinances of the City of Renton, Washington", as amended, and the maps and reports
adopted in conjunction therewith, the City of Renton has heretofore collected on behalf of the
Issaquah School District an impact fee of $3,344 for each new single-family home built within
the District's boundaries; and
WHEREAS, the Issaquah School District requested that the City of Renton adopt the
District's 2010 Capital Facilities Plan, which includes an increase in the impact fee for new
single-family homes to $3,808; and
WHEREAS, under Section 4-1-160 of Chapter 1, Administration and Enforcement, of
Title IV (Development Regulations), of Ordinance No. 4260 entitled "Code of General
Ordinances of the City of Renton, Washington", as amended, and the maps and reports
adopted in conjunction therewith, the City of Renton has heretofore collected on behalf of the
8b. ‐ Issaquah, Kent, and Renton School District impact fees (1st reading
3/14/2011)Page 218 of 221
ORDINANCE NO.
Kent School District an impact fee of $5,394 for each new single-family home and $3,322 per
new multi-family unit built within the District's boundaries; and
WHEREAS, the Kent School District requested that the City of Renton adopt the District's
2010/2011 - 2015/2016 Capital Facilities Plan, which recommends an increase in the impact fee
for new single-family homes to $5,486 and an increase in the impact fee for new multi-family
units to $3,378; and
WHEREAS, under Section 4-1-160 of Chapter 1, Administration and Enforcement, of
Title IV (Development Regulations), of Ordinance No. 4260 entitled "Code of General
Ordinances of the City of Renton, Washington", as amended, and the maps and reports
adopted in conjunction therewith, the City of Renton has heretofore collected on behalf of the
Renton School District an impact fee of $6,310 for each new single-family home and $1,258 per
new multi-family unit built within the District's boundaries; and until recently the Renton
School District has been able to accommodate growth within existing facilities, but currently
estimates a need for additional school facilities within the next six (6) years to accommodate
anticipated growth; and
WHEREAS, the Renton School District has not submitted an updated Capital Facilities
Plan; and
WHEREAS, the adopted 2008 Capital Facilities for the Renton School District
recommends the collection of an impact fee for new single-family homes of $6,310 and the
collection of an impact fee for new multi-family units of $1,258;
NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON, DOES
ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS:
8b. ‐ Issaquah, Kent, and Renton School District impact fees (1st reading
3/14/2011)Page 219 of 221
ORDINANCE NO.
SECTION I. Subsection 4-1-160D.5 of subsection 4-1-160D, Fee Calculations, of Chapter
1, Administration and Enforcement, of Title IV (Development Regulations) of Ordinance No.
4260 entitled "Code of General Ordinances of the City of Renton, Washington", is hereby
amended as follows:
5. The City Council may adjust the fee calculated under this subsection, as
needed it sees fit, to take into account local conditions such as, but not limited
to, price differentials throughout the District in the cost of new housing, school
occupancy levels, and the percent of the District's Capital Facilities Budget which
will be expended locally. The City Council establishes the following fees:
Issaquah School District
Kent School District
Renton School District
Single Family Fee
Amount
$3,344808.00
$5,394486.00
$6,310.00
Multi-Family and
Accessory Dwelling
Unit Fee Amount
Not Applicable
$3,522-378.00
$1,258.00
SECTION II. Subsection 4-1-160J.1 of subsection 4-1-160J, Adoption of the District
Capital Facilities Plan and Submission of the Annual Updates and Report and Data, of Chapter 1,
Administration and Enforcement of Title IV (Development Regulations) of Ordinance No. 4260
entitled "Code of General Ordinances of the City of Renton, Washington", is hereby amended
as follows:
8b. ‐ Issaquah, Kent, and Renton School District impact fees (1st reading
3/14/2011)Page 220 of 221
ORDINANCE NO.
1. The following capital facilities plans are hereby adopted by reference by
the City as part of the Capital Facilities Element of the City's Comprehensive
Plan:
a. The Issaquah School District No. 4112009-2010 Capital Facilities Plan;
b. The Kent School District No. 415 2009/2010 - 2014/2015 2010/2011
-2015/2016 Capital Facilities Plan;
c. The Renton School District No. 403 2008 Capital Facilities Plan.
SECTION III. This ordinance shall be effective upon its passage, approval and thirty
(30) days after publication.
PASSED BY THE CITY COUNCIL this day of , 2011.
Bonnie I. Walton, City Clerk
APPROVED BY THE MAYOR this day of. _, 2011.
Approved as to form:
Lawrence J. Warren, City Attorney
Denis Law, Mayor
Date of Publication:
ORD.1695:2/3/ll:scr
8b. ‐ Issaquah, Kent, and Renton School District impact fees (1st reading
3/14/2011)Page 221 of 221