HomeMy WebLinkAboutCouncil 01/23/2012AGENDA
RENTON CITY COUNCIL
REGULAR MEETING
January 23, 2012
Monday, 7 p.m.
1.CALL TO ORDER AND PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE
2.ROLL CALL
3.PROCLAMATION
a. Renton Heart Month ‐ February 2012
4.SPECIAL PRESENTATION
a. Forensic Mental Health Peer Support Program by Valley Cities Counseling & South Correctional
Entity (SCORE).
5.PUBLIC MEETING
a. Windstone V Annexation ‐ 10% Notice of Intent to Annex approximately 4.3 acres located
south of NE 16th St., if extended, west but not abutting 148th Ave. SE, north of NE Sunset Blvd.,
and east of Jericho Ave. NE, if extended.
6.ADMINISTRATIVE REPORT
7.AUDIENCE COMMENT
(Speakers must sign up prior to the Council meeting. Each speaker is allowed five minutes. The
comment period will be limited to one‐half hour. The second audience comment period later on in
the agenda is unlimited in duration.) When you are recognized by the Presiding Officer, please
walk to the podium and state your name and city of residence for the record, SPELLING YOUR LAST
NAME.
8.CONSENT AGENDA
The following items are distributed to Councilmembers in advance for study and review, and the
recommended actions will be accepted in a single motion. Any item may be removed for further
discussion if requested by a Councilmember.
a. Approval of Council meeting minutes of 1/9/2012. Council concur.
b. Mayor Law reappoints the following individuals to the Municipal Arts Commission for terms
expiring on 12/31/2014: Jerri Everett, Peter Hartley, and Doug Kyes. Council concur.
c. City Clerk submits quarterly contract list for period 10/1/2011 through 12/31/2011, and
expiration report for agreements expiring 1/1/2012 to 6/30/2012. Information.
d. Community and Economic Development Department requests consideration of school district
impact fee changes and adoption of the related ordinance. Refer to Finance Committee.
e. Transportation Systems Division recommends approval of a contract in the amount of $172,600
with URS Corporation for airport on‐call architectural/engineering services. Refer to
Transportation (Aviation) Committee.
f. Transportation Systems Division recommends approval of an interlocal agreement with King
County to transfer drainage facilities in the May Creek Park Area that were built to
accomodate water run‐off from the Duvall Ave. NE/Coal Creek Parkway Road Widening project
Page 1 of 105
and have since been annexed to the City of Renton. Council Concur. (See 10.a. for resolution.)
g. Utilities Systems Division submits CAG‐10‐120, Lake Washington Beach Lift Station
Replacement project; and requests approval of the project, authorization for final pay estimate
in the amount of $3,186.45, commencement of a 60‐day lien period, and release of retained
amount of $13,622.58 to Kamins Construction, contractor, if all required releases are
obtained. Council concur.
h. Utilities Systems Division submits CAG‐11‐148, Sanitary Sewer Repairs 2011 project; and
requests approval of the project, authorization for final pay estimate in the amount of
$4,653.75, commencement of a 60‐day lien period, and release of retained amount of
$8,046.41 to Shoreline Construction, Inc., contractor, if all required releases are obtained.
Council concur.
9.UNFINISHED BUSINESS
Topics listed below were discussed in Council committees during the past week. Those topics
marked with an asterisk (*) may include legislation. Committee reports on any topics may be held
by the Chair if further review is necessary.
a. Finance Committee: Annual Reclassification of Positions; Vouchers; Rainier Ave. S. Project Bid
Award & Funding; Lease Amendment with King County METRO; Regional Aerial Mapping
Funding Agreement*
b. Planning & Development Committee: Glennwood Townhomes Fee Waiver Request
c. Public Safety Committee: Written Statement for Tow Hearings*; Ordinance Amending RMC 6‐
18*; Ordinance Correcting References to RMC 1‐3*
10.RESOLUTIONS AND ORDINANCES
Resolutions:
a. Transfer of Drainage Facilities interlocal agreement with King County (See 8.f.)
b. Regional Aerial Mapping Funding interlocal agreement with King County (See 9.a.)
Ordinances for first reading:
a. Code amendment regarding a written statement for tow hearings (See 9.c.)
b. Code Amendment revising RMC 6‐18 (See 9.c.)
c. Code amendment correcting references to RMC 1‐3 (See 9.c.)
11.NEW BUSINESS
(Includes Council Committee agenda topics; call 425‐430‐6512 for recorded information.)
12.AUDIENCE COMMENT
13.ADJOURNMENT
Page 2 of 105
COMMITTEE OF THE WHOLE AGENDA
(Preceding Council Meeting)
January 23, 2012
Monday, 5 p.m.
COUNCIL CHAMBERS
Community Survey Results
Monday, 5:45 p.m.
CONFERENCING CENTER
Regional Committee Updates; Council Policy & Procedures
• Hearing assistance devices for use in the Council Chambers are available upon request to the City Clerk •
CITY COUNCIL MEETINGS ARE TELEVISED LIVE ON GOVERNMENT ACCESS CHANNEL 21 AND ARE RECABLECAST:
Tues. & Thurs. at 11 AM & 9 PM, Wed. & Fri at 9 AM & 7 PM and Sat. & Sun. at 1 PM & 9 PM
Page 3 of 105
3a
.
‐
R
e
n
t
o
n
H
e
a
r
t
M
o
n
t
h
‐
F
e
b
r
u
a
r
y
2
0
1
2
Pa
g
e
4
o
f
1
0
5
! "#! $ %& ' ( ) *" ' +' , !
- % $ %& '
- & - ) % !
- ) % ! & - .& / &% $ 0. & ) 1&
) 2! - % % +3 $ & . & !
' % +'*4 % '
& % ) % 5 6 0)56 2 $ %
5 ( 7 ' & % 8 & )4+ 9 ! -& - 9 -
) '
& % 1& % &-% %
! : ! %% '
& % %% %% ;
' & 9 &% < 6 '
,' 6 1& &% & 9
$ % '
5a. ‐ Windstone V Annexation ‐ 10% Notice of Intent to Annex
approximately 4.3 acres located south of NE 16th St., if extended, west Page 5 of 105
5a. ‐ Windstone V Annexation ‐ 10% Notice of Intent to Annex
approximately 4.3 acres located south of NE 16th St., if extended, west Page 6 of 105
CITY OF RENTON COUNCIL AGENDA BILL
Subject/Title:
Reappointments to Renton Municipal Arts
Commission
Meeting:
Regular Council - 23 Jan 2012
Exhibits:
None
Submitting Data: Dept/Div/Board:
Executive
Staff Contact:
April Alexander, Executive Assistant
Recommended Action:
Council concur
Fiscal Impact:
Expenditure Required: $ N/A Transfer Amendment: $N/A
Amount Budgeted: $ N/A Revenue Generated: $N/A
Total Project Budget: $ N/A City Share Total Project: $ N/A
SUMMARY OF ACTION:
Mayor Law reappoints the following to the Renton Municipal Arts Commission:
Ms. Jerri Everett, 2525 Morris Avenue S, Renton, WA 98055, for a term expiring 12/31/14
Mr. Peter Hartley, 600 Cedar Avenue S, Renton, WA 98057, for a term expiring 12/31/14
Mr. Doug Kyes, 2837 Blaine Avenue NE, Renton, WA 98056, for a term expiring 12/31/14
STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
Concur with Mayor Law's reappointments of Ms. Jerri Everett, Mr. Peter Hartley and Mr. Doug Kyes to
the Renton Municipal Arts Commission.
8b. ‐ Mayor Law reappoints the following individuals to the Municipal
Arts Commission for terms expiring on 12/31/2014: Jerri Everett, Peter Page 7 of 105
CITY OF RENTON COUNCIL AGENDA BILL
Subject/Title:
City of Renton Contract Lists:
* Signed 4th Quarter 2011
* Six-month Expiration Report
Meeting:
Regular Council - 23 Jan 2012
Exhibits:
List of agreements signed from October 1, 2011
through December 31, 2011;
List of agreements expiring between January 1,
2012 and June 30, 2012.
Submitting Data: Dept/Div/Board:
Executive
Staff Contact:
Bonnie I. Walton, City Clerk
Recommended Action:
None; Information only
Fiscal Impact:
Expenditure Required: $ N/A Transfer Amendment: $N/A
Amount Budgeted: $ N/A Revenue Generated: $N/A
Total Project Budget: $ N/A City Share Total Project: $ N/A
SUMMARY OF ACTION:
Fully executed in fourth quarter 2011 were 40 contracts, 14 addendums, 12 change orders, and 1 lease
affecting 67 agreements.
The six-month expiration report shows 48 agreements that will expire between January 1, 2012 and
June 30, 2012.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
None; Information only
8c. ‐ City Clerk submits quarterly contract list for period 10/1/2011
through 12/31/2011, and expiration report for agreements expiring Page 8 of 105
8c. ‐ City Clerk submits quarterly contract list for period 10/1/2011
through 12/31/2011, and expiration report for agreements expiring Page 9 of 105
8c. ‐ City Clerk submits quarterly contract list for period 10/1/2011
through 12/31/2011, and expiration report for agreements expiring Page 10 of 105
8c. ‐ City Clerk submits quarterly contract list for period 10/1/2011
through 12/31/2011, and expiration report for agreements expiring Page 11 of 105
8c. ‐ City Clerk submits quarterly contract list for period 10/1/2011
through 12/31/2011, and expiration report for agreements expiring Page 12 of 105
8c. ‐ City Clerk submits quarterly contract list for period 10/1/2011
through 12/31/2011, and expiration report for agreements expiring Page 13 of 105
8c. ‐ City Clerk submits quarterly contract list for period 10/1/2011
through 12/31/2011, and expiration report for agreements expiring Page 14 of 105
8c. ‐ City Clerk submits quarterly contract list for period 10/1/2011
through 12/31/2011, and expiration report for agreements expiring Page 15 of 105
8c. ‐ City Clerk submits quarterly contract list for period 10/1/2011
through 12/31/2011, and expiration report for agreements expiring Page 16 of 105
8c. ‐ City Clerk submits quarterly contract list for period 10/1/2011
through 12/31/2011, and expiration report for agreements expiring Page 17 of 105
8c. ‐ City Clerk submits quarterly contract list for period 10/1/2011
through 12/31/2011, and expiration report for agreements expiring Page 18 of 105
8c. ‐ City Clerk submits quarterly contract list for period 10/1/2011
through 12/31/2011, and expiration report for agreements expiring Page 19 of 105
8c. ‐ City Clerk submits quarterly contract list for period 10/1/2011
through 12/31/2011, and expiration report for agreements expiring Page 20 of 105
8c. ‐ City Clerk submits quarterly contract list for period 10/1/2011
through 12/31/2011, and expiration report for agreements expiring Page 21 of 105
CITY OF RENTON COUNCIL AGENDA BILL
Subject/Title:
2012 School Impact Fees
Meeting:
Regular Council - 23 Jan 2012
Exhibits:
Issue Paper
Submitting Data: Dept/Div/Board:
Community and Economic Development
Staff Contact:
Rocale Timmons, x7219
Recommended Action:
Refer to Finance Committee
Fiscal Impact:
Expenditure Required: $ 0 Transfer Amendment: $0
Amount Budgeted: $ 0 Revenue Generated: $0
Total Project Budget: $ 0 City Share Total Project: $ 0
SUMMARY OF ACTION:
Requests have been made to approve changes to the collection of school impact fees and the concurrenence of
revised Capital Facilities Plans for three school districts within the City of Renton as follows:
• Collect the requested impact fee of $3,568, a decrease of $240, for each new single-family home on behalf of
the Issaquah School District; and
• Continue to collect an impact fee of $5,486 for each new single-family home and $3,378 for each new multi-
family unit on behalf of the Kent School District; and
• Collect the requested impact fee of $7,632, an increase of $1,322, for each new single-family home and
$2,440, an increase of $1,182, for each new multi-family unit on behalf of the Renton School District.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
Consider impact fee changes as requested and if approved, adopt an Ordinance
8d. ‐ Community and Economic Development Department requests
consideration of school district impact fee changes and adoption of the
Page 22 of 105
DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY
AND ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT
M E M O R A N D U M
DATE:January 13, 2012
TO:Rich Zwicker, Council President
Members of the Renton City Council
VIA:Denis Law, Mayor
FROM:Alex Pietsch, Administrator
STAFF CONTACT:Rocale Timmons, x7219
SUBJECT:School District Impact Fees
ISSUE:
·Should the City of Renton update school impact fees for the Issaquah, Kent, and
Renton School Districts?
RECOMMENDATION:
·Refer to Finance Committee for discussion.
BACKGROUND SUMMARY:
Washington’s Growth Management Act authorizes the collection of impact fees to help
ensure that those responsible for growth pay a fair share for the cost of new facilities
needed to support new growth. School impact fees are assessed only on newly built
household units and can only be used to support the capital costs of expanded existing
or building new facilities. Operations and maintenance costs are not eligible expenses
for impact fees. Impact fees can be assessed to support a number of different capital
funds that are needed to support growth. Commonly, impact fees are collected for
things such as improvements to schools, parks, and transportation systems. The amount
collected for an impact fee is based upon a CFP that must show that there is a need for
capital projects due to growth.
In November 1999, the City adopted Ordinance No. 4804, which added a new section to
Title IV entitled “School Impact Fees”. This section authorized the City to collect school
impact fees for the Issaquah School District and provided for an annual review of the fee
structure. Last year the Council approved the collection of $3,808 on behalf of the
Issaquah School District for each new single-family dwelling built within the District’s
boundaries. This year, the Issaquah School District has asked for a decrease in the fee to
$3,568. Plans in the 2011 Capital Facilities Plan include the expansion of one
elementary, one middle school and three high school facilities. The District has also
recently completed a citizen’s committee regarding the need for an additional bond
8d. ‐ Community and Economic Development Department requests
consideration of school district impact fee changes and adoption of the
Page 23 of 105
Rich Zwicker, Council President
Page 2 of 2
January 13, 2012
issue, of approximately $228 million, for the February 2012 ballot.
Given the likelihood of annexation of land to the City of Renton within the boundaries of
the Kent School District, the Council authorized the collection of an impact fee for new
single-family and multi-family homes. The Kent School District is requesting to continue
the collection of the same fee of $5,486 per new single-family home. Additionally, the
District is requesting the continuation of the collection of the fee for new multi-family
units in the amount to $3,378 for the upcoming year. The District’s 2011/2012 –
2016/2017 Capital Facilities Plan includes the addition of facilities that would serve
current and future (within the PAA) Renton residents, which includes the expansion of
an existing elementary and high school facility, in addition to the acquisition of a site for
a new elementary school. The district expects to receive some State Funding Assistance
for these projects. The adjustment of the Kent School District, based on current
economic conditions, results in no change to the current impact fees.
The Renton School District is requesting a $1,322 increase in the fee for single-family
homes the upcoming year, to bring the total amount to $7,632 per new single-family
home. Additionally, the District is requesting a $1,182 increase in the fee for new
multi-family units, to bring the total amount to $2,440 for the upcoming year. The
District’s 2011 – 2017 Capital Facilities Plan includes the addition of facilities that would
serve current and future Renton residents, which includes additional elementary and
middle school facilities. RSD serves as primary district liaison with seven municipalities
and jurisdictions: cities of Renton, Bellevue, Issaquah, Tukwila Newcastle, Seattle and
unincorporated King County. They anticipate adoption of their impact fee by King
County in January of 2012. They are not pursuing fee establishment in Bellevue, Tukwila,
or Kent as their jurisdictional boundaries in these cities are either fully built out
(Bellevue), or entirely made up of commercial and industrial areas.
CONCLUSION:
Refer to the Finance Committee for discussion.
cc:Jay Covington, Chief Administrative Officer
Iwen Wang, FIT Administrator
Chip Vincent, Planning Director
Neil Watts, Development Services Director
8d. ‐ Community and Economic Development Department requests
consideration of school district impact fee changes and adoption of the
Page 24 of 105
CITY OF RENTON COUNCIL AGENDA BILL
Subject/Title:
URS Agreement for Airport On-Call
Architectural/Engineering Services
Meeting:
Regular Council - 23 Jan 2012
Exhibits:
Issue Paper
Standard Consultant Agreement with URS
Corporation
Submitting Data: Dept/Div/Board:
Public Works
Staff Contact:
Ben Dahle, ext. 7476
Recommended Action:
Refer to Transportation/Aviation Committee
Fiscal Impact:
Expenditure Required: $ 172,600 Transfer Amendment: $
Amount Budgeted: $ Revenue Generated: $
Total Project Budget: $ 1,370,000 City Share Total Project: $ 172,600
SUMMARY OF ACTION:
Approval of a Standard Consultant Agreement with URS Corporation, in the amount of $172,600, is being
requested in order to work on the design for several Capital Improvement Projects on the Airport. The
Scope of Work identifies the design work associated with each project and lists them by separate tasks.
A table of affected projects, cost to complete each design task, and the corresponding line item budget
is included in the issue paper.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
Approve the Standard Consultant Agreement with URS Corporation in the amount of $172,600 for On-
Call Architectural/Engineering Services and authorize the Mayor and City Clerk to sign the agreement.
8e. ‐ Transportation Systems Division recommends approval of a
contract in the amount of $172,600 with URS Corporation for airport on‐Page 25 of 105
8e. ‐ Transportation Systems Division recommends approval of a
contract in the amount of $172,600 with URS Corporation for airport on‐Page 26 of 105
8e. ‐ Transportation Systems Division recommends approval of a
contract in the amount of $172,600 with URS Corporation for airport on‐Page 27 of 105
8e. ‐ Transportation Systems Division recommends approval of a
contract in the amount of $172,600 with URS Corporation for airport on‐Page 28 of 105
8e. ‐ Transportation Systems Division recommends approval of a
contract in the amount of $172,600 with URS Corporation for airport on‐Page 29 of 105
8e. ‐ Transportation Systems Division recommends approval of a
contract in the amount of $172,600 with URS Corporation for airport on‐Page 30 of 105
8e. ‐ Transportation Systems Division recommends approval of a
contract in the amount of $172,600 with URS Corporation for airport on‐Page 31 of 105
8e. ‐ Transportation Systems Division recommends approval of a
contract in the amount of $172,600 with URS Corporation for airport on‐Page 32 of 105
8e. ‐ Transportation Systems Division recommends approval of a
contract in the amount of $172,600 with URS Corporation for airport on‐Page 33 of 105
8e. ‐ Transportation Systems Division recommends approval of a
contract in the amount of $172,600 with URS Corporation for airport on‐Page 34 of 105
8e. ‐ Transportation Systems Division recommends approval of a
contract in the amount of $172,600 with URS Corporation for airport on‐Page 35 of 105
8e. ‐ Transportation Systems Division recommends approval of a
contract in the amount of $172,600 with URS Corporation for airport on‐Page 36 of 105
8e. ‐ Transportation Systems Division recommends approval of a
contract in the amount of $172,600 with URS Corporation for airport on‐Page 37 of 105
8e. ‐ Transportation Systems Division recommends approval of a
contract in the amount of $172,600 with URS Corporation for airport on‐Page 38 of 105
8e. ‐ Transportation Systems Division recommends approval of a
contract in the amount of $172,600 with URS Corporation for airport on‐Page 39 of 105
8e. ‐ Transportation Systems Division recommends approval of a
contract in the amount of $172,600 with URS Corporation for airport on‐Page 40 of 105
8e. ‐ Transportation Systems Division recommends approval of a
contract in the amount of $172,600 with URS Corporation for airport on‐Page 41 of 105
8e. ‐ Transportation Systems Division recommends approval of a
contract in the amount of $172,600 with URS Corporation for airport on‐Page 42 of 105
8e. ‐ Transportation Systems Division recommends approval of a
contract in the amount of $172,600 with URS Corporation for airport on‐Page 43 of 105
8e. ‐ Transportation Systems Division recommends approval of a
contract in the amount of $172,600 with URS Corporation for airport on‐Page 44 of 105
8e. ‐ Transportation Systems Division recommends approval of a
contract in the amount of $172,600 with URS Corporation for airport on‐Page 45 of 105
8e. ‐ Transportation Systems Division recommends approval of a
contract in the amount of $172,600 with URS Corporation for airport on‐Page 46 of 105
8e. ‐ Transportation Systems Division recommends approval of a
contract in the amount of $172,600 with URS Corporation for airport on‐Page 47 of 105
8e. ‐ Transportation Systems Division recommends approval of a
contract in the amount of $172,600 with URS Corporation for airport on‐Page 48 of 105
8e. ‐ Transportation Systems Division recommends approval of a
contract in the amount of $172,600 with URS Corporation for airport on‐Page 49 of 105
8e. ‐ Transportation Systems Division recommends approval of a
contract in the amount of $172,600 with URS Corporation for airport on‐Page 50 of 105
8e. ‐ Transportation Systems Division recommends approval of a
contract in the amount of $172,600 with URS Corporation for airport on‐Page 51 of 105
8e. ‐ Transportation Systems Division recommends approval of a
contract in the amount of $172,600 with URS Corporation for airport on‐Page 52 of 105
8e. ‐ Transportation Systems Division recommends approval of a
contract in the amount of $172,600 with URS Corporation for airport on‐Page 53 of 105
CITY OF RENTON COUNCIL AGENDA BILL
Subject/Title:
Interlocal Agreement with King County to Transfer
Drainage Facilities in the May Creek Park Area
Meeting:
Regular Council - 23 Jan 2012
Exhibits:
Issue Paper
Interlocal Agreement
Resolution
Submitting Data: Dept/Div/Board:
Public Works
Staff Contact:
James Wilhoit, Design Project Manager (x7319)
Recommended Action:
Council Concur
Fiscal Impact:
Expenditure Required: $ Transfer Amendment: $
Amount Budgeted: $ Revenue Generated: $
Total Project Budget: $ $9,475,541 City Share Total Project: $
SUMMARY OF ACTION:
This action will finalize the transfer of Oehrling and Brant properties in the May Creek Park vicinity
where drainage facilities were built to accommodate runoff from the Duvall/Coal Creek Parkway Road
Widening Project. The properties were in unincorporated King County at the time they were acquired by
King County and construction of the facilities began on them, but they have since been annexed into the
City of Renton. It is appropriate for ownership and responsibility for the operation and maintenance of
the facilities to be transferred to the City.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
Approve an interlocal agreement with King County to transfer two parcels, known as the Oehrling and
Brant properties, and responsibility for the operation and maintenance of the stormwater detention
pond and associated facilities located on the properties to the City of Renton, and adopt the Resolution.
8f. ‐ Transportation Systems Division recommends approval of an
interlocal agreement with King County to transfer drainage facilities in
Page 54 of 105
8f. ‐ Transportation Systems Division recommends approval of an
interlocal agreement with King County to transfer drainage facilities in
Page 55 of 105
8f. ‐ Transportation Systems Division recommends approval of an
interlocal agreement with King County to transfer drainage facilities in
Page 56 of 105
8f. ‐ Transportation Systems Division recommends approval of an
interlocal agreement with King County to transfer drainage facilities in
Page 57 of 105
8f. ‐ Transportation Systems Division recommends approval of an
interlocal agreement with King County to transfer drainage facilities in
Page 58 of 105
8f. ‐ Transportation Systems Division recommends approval of an
interlocal agreement with King County to transfer drainage facilities in
Page 59 of 105
8f. ‐ Transportation Systems Division recommends approval of an
interlocal agreement with King County to transfer drainage facilities in
Page 60 of 105
8f. ‐ Transportation Systems Division recommends approval of an
interlocal agreement with King County to transfer drainage facilities in
Page 61 of 105
8f. ‐ Transportation Systems Division recommends approval of an
interlocal agreement with King County to transfer drainage facilities in
Page 62 of 105
8f. ‐ Transportation Systems Division recommends approval of an
interlocal agreement with King County to transfer drainage facilities in
Page 63 of 105
8f. ‐ Transportation Systems Division recommends approval of an
interlocal agreement with King County to transfer drainage facilities in
Page 64 of 105
8f. ‐ Transportation Systems Division recommends approval of an
interlocal agreement with King County to transfer drainage facilities in
Page 65 of 105
8f. ‐ Transportation Systems Division recommends approval of an
interlocal agreement with King County to transfer drainage facilities in
Page 66 of 105
CITY OF RENTON COUNCIL AGENDA BILL
Subject/Title:
Final Pay Estimate CAG 10-120
Lake Washington Beach Lift Station Replacement
Contractor: Kamins Construction
Meeting:
Regular Council - 23 Jan 2012
Exhibits:
Final Pay Estimate
Notice Of Completion of Public Works Contract
Submitting Data: Dept/Div/Board:
Public Works
Staff Contact:
Michael Benoit, Wastewater Utility, x7206
Recommended Action:
Council Concur
Fiscal Impact:
Expenditure Required: $ $3,186.45 (Final Pay Est.) Transfer Amendment: $
Amount Budgeted: $ $5,000 Revenue Generated: $
Total Project Budget: $ $650,000 City Share Total Project: $
SUMMARY OF ACTION:
The project was awarded on November 1, 2010. Construction began on December 6, 2010, and was
completed on December 30, 2011. The original contract amount was $293,060.11 and the final amount
is $298,334.53, an increase of $5,274.42 or 2 percent. The increase in cost was due to required
revisions from the original design of the motor control panel. The final cost was below the original
engineer’s estimate and within the amount budgeted for the project.
The amount budgeted for the project was $650,000, which is enough to cover the construction,
engineering, and staff costs.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
Accept the project, approve the final pay estimate, in the amount of $3,186.45, and release the
retainage in the amount of $13,622.58 after 60 days, subject to the receipt of all required
authorizations.
8g. ‐ Utilities Systems Division submits CAG‐10‐120, Lake Washington
Beach Lift Station Replacement project; and requests approval of the
Page 67 of 105
8g. ‐ Utilities Systems Division submits CAG‐10‐120, Lake Washington
Beach Lift Station Replacement project; and requests approval of the
Page 68 of 105
8g. ‐ Utilities Systems Division submits CAG‐10‐120, Lake Washington
Beach Lift Station Replacement project; and requests approval of the
Page 69 of 105
8g. ‐ Utilities Systems Division submits CAG‐10‐120, Lake Washington
Beach Lift Station Replacement project; and requests approval of the
Page 70 of 105
8g. ‐ Utilities Systems Division submits CAG‐10‐120, Lake Washington
Beach Lift Station Replacement project; and requests approval of the
Page 71 of 105
CITY OF RENTON COUNCIL AGENDA BILL
Subject/Title:
Final Pay Estimate CAG 11-148
Sanitary Sewer Repairs 2011
Contractor: Shoreline Construction Co.
Meeting:
Regular Council - 23 Jan 2012
Exhibits:
Final Pay Estimate
Notice Of Completion of Public Works Contract
Submitting Data: Dept/Div/Board:
Public Works
Staff Contact:
John Hobson,Wastewater Utility, x7279
Recommended Action:
Council Concur
Fiscal Impact:
Expenditure Required: $ 4,653.75 (Final Pay Est.) Transfer Amendment: $
Amount Budgeted: $ 5,000 Revenue Generated: $
Total Project Budget: $ 1,130,000 City Share Total Project: $
SUMMARY OF ACTION:
The project was awarded on September 12, 2011. Construction began on October 25, 2011, and was
completed on November 15, 2011. The original contract amount was $158,096.10 and the final amount
is $176,216.34, an increase of $18,120.24 or 11 percent. The increase in cost was due to the repair of
two additional broken tees and repair of a broken side sewer that were discovered during construction
and the replacement of a deteriorated manhole that was found during the pre-construction TV
inspection. The final cost was below the original engineer’s estimate and within the amount budgeted
for the project.
The budget for this project was included in the Presidents Park Sewer Replacement account
(426.465488) in the amount of $1,130,000 (2011) and included funds for several small contracts,
including the Sanitary Sewer Rehabilitation 2011 and the Sanitary Sewer Repairs 2011 projects, to repair
and/or rehabilitate old concrete sewer mains. The amount budgeted for this project is enough to cover
the construction, engineering, and staff costs of this project as well as those costs associated with the
Sanitary Sewer Rehabilitation 2011 project which is estimated at an additional $200,000.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
Accept the project, approve the final pay estimate, in the amount of $4,653.75, and release the
retainage in the amount of $8,046.41 after 60 days, subject to the receipt of all required authorizations.
8h. ‐ Utilities Systems Division submits CAG‐11‐148, Sanitary Sewer
Repairs 2011 project; and requests approval of the project, authorization
Page 72 of 105
8h. ‐ Utilities Systems Division submits CAG‐11‐148, Sanitary Sewer
Repairs 2011 project; and requests approval of the project, authorization
Page 73 of 105
8h. ‐ Utilities Systems Division submits CAG‐11‐148, Sanitary Sewer
Repairs 2011 project; and requests approval of the project, authorization
Page 74 of 105
8h. ‐ Utilities Systems Division submits CAG‐11‐148, Sanitary Sewer
Repairs 2011 project; and requests approval of the project, authorization
Page 75 of 105
8h. ‐ Utilities Systems Division submits CAG‐11‐148, Sanitary Sewer
Repairs 2011 project; and requests approval of the project, authorization
Page 76 of 105
10a. ‐ Transfer of Drainage Facilities interlocal agreement with King
County (See 8.f.)Page 77 of 105
10a. ‐ Transfer of Drainage Facilities interlocal agreement with King
County (See 8.f.)Page 78 of 105
10b. ‐ Regional Aerial Mapping Funding interlocal agreement with King
County (See 9.a.)Page 79 of 105
10b. ‐ Regional Aerial Mapping Funding interlocal agreement with King
County (See 9.a.)Page 80 of 105
10b. ‐ Regional Aerial Mapping Funding interlocal agreement with King
County (See 9.a.)Page 81 of 105
10a. ‐ Code amendment regarding a written statement for tow hearings
(See 9.c.)Page 82 of 105
10a. ‐ Code amendment regarding a written statement for tow hearings
(See 9.c.)Page 83 of 105
10b. ‐ Code Amendment revising RMC 6‐18 (See 9.c.)Page 84 of 105
10b. ‐ Code Amendment revising RMC 6‐18 (See 9.c.)Page 85 of 105
10b. ‐ Code Amendment revising RMC 6‐18 (See 9.c.)Page 86 of 105
10b. ‐ Code Amendment revising RMC 6‐18 (See 9.c.)Page 87 of 105
10b. ‐ Code Amendment revising RMC 6‐18 (See 9.c.)Page 88 of 105
10b. ‐ Code Amendment revising RMC 6‐18 (See 9.c.)Page 89 of 105
10b. ‐ Code Amendment revising RMC 6‐18 (See 9.c.)Page 90 of 105
10b. ‐ Code Amendment revising RMC 6‐18 (See 9.c.)Page 91 of 105
10b. ‐ Code Amendment revising RMC 6‐18 (See 9.c.)Page 92 of 105
10b. ‐ Code Amendment revising RMC 6‐18 (See 9.c.)Page 93 of 105
10b. ‐ Code Amendment revising RMC 6‐18 (See 9.c.)Page 94 of 105
10b. ‐ Code Amendment revising RMC 6‐18 (See 9.c.)Page 95 of 105
10b. ‐ Code Amendment revising RMC 6‐18 (See 9.c.)Page 96 of 105
10b. ‐ Code Amendment revising RMC 6‐18 (See 9.c.)Page 97 of 105
10b. ‐ Code Amendment revising RMC 6‐18 (See 9.c.)Page 98 of 105
10b. ‐ Code Amendment revising RMC 6‐18 (See 9.c.)Page 99 of 105
10b. ‐ Code Amendment revising RMC 6‐18 (See 9.c.)Page 100 of 105
10b. ‐ Code Amendment revising RMC 6‐18 (See 9.c.)Page 101 of 105
10c. ‐ Code amendment correcting references to RMC 1‐3 (See 9.c.)Page 102 of 105
10c. ‐ Code amendment correcting references to RMC 1‐3 (See 9.c.)Page 103 of 105
10c. ‐ Code amendment correcting references to RMC 1‐3 (See 9.c.)Page 104 of 105
10c. ‐ Code amendment correcting references to RMC 1‐3 (See 9.c.)Page 105 of 105