Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutCouncil 09/10/2012AGENDA  RENTON CITY COUNCIL    REGULAR MEETING  September 10, 2012  Monday, 7 p.m.  1.CALL TO ORDER AND PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE 2.ROLL CALL 3.PROCLAMATIONS a. Mayor's Day of Concern for the Hungry ‐ September 22, 2012  b. National Recovery Month ‐ September 2012  4.SPECIAL PRESENTATION a. Renton Residents Advocacy Coalition ‐ Library Design  5.PUBLIC HEARING a. Updates to Fire Protection, Parks, and Transportation Impact Fees  6.ADMINISTRATIVE REPORT 7.AUDIENCE COMMENT (Speakers must sign up prior to the Council meeting.  Each speaker is allowed five minutes.  The  comment period will be limited to one‐half hour.  The second comment period later on in the  agenda is unlimited in duration.)  When you are recognized by the Presiding Officer, please walk to  the podium and state your name and city of residence for the record, SPELLING YOUR LAST NAME.   NOTICE to all participants:  pursuant to state law, RCW 42.17A.555, campaigning for any ballot  measure or candidate in City Hall and/or during any portion of the council meeting, including  the audience comment portion of the meeting, is PROHIBITED. 8.CONSENT AGENDA The following items are distributed to Councilmembers in advance for study and review, and the  recommended actions will be accepted in a single motion.  Any item may be removed for further  discussion if requested by a Councilmember.  a. Approval of 8/20/2012 Council meeting minutes.  Council concur.  b. Mayor Law reappoints the following individuals to the Parks Commission for terms expiring on  6/1/2016:  Larry Reymann and Troy Wigestrand.  Council concur.  c. City Clerk reports appeal of Hearing Examiner's decision regarding Lots 9, 10, 11, and 12 at the  Galloway at the Highlands Final Plat, filed on 7/19/2012 by representative Talis Abolins of  Campbell, Dille, Barnett & Smith, PLLC, accompanied by required fee.  (File No. LUA‐07‐128,  FP).  Refer to Planning and Development Committee.  Consideration of the appeal by the  City Council shall be based solely upon the record, the Hearing Examiner's report, the  notice of appeal, and additional submissions by parties (RMC 4‐8‐110.F.6.). Page 1 of 325 d. Administrative  Services  Department  recommends  accepting  a  Quit‐Claim  Deed  with  King  County Fire Protection District No. 25 that transfers ownership of Fire Station 16 (12923 156th  Ave. SE) to the City of Renton.  Council concur.  e. Police  Department  recommends  approval  of  an  addendum  to  CAG‐07‐166,  with  American  Traffic Solutions, Inc. to extend the term of the Traffic Safety Camera System agreement for an  additional five years, at a cost of $2,251,980 over the five‐year period.  Council concur.  f. Police  Department  recommends  approval  of interlocal  agreements  with  non‐participating  jurisdictions for the provision of Valley Special Weapons and Tactics (VSWAT) team services  on an "as needed" basis.  Council concur. (See 10.a. for resolution.)  g. Police Department recommends approval of a Memorandum of Understanding with the Valley  Cities Association in the amount of $30,000 per year for two years for planning, funding, and  implementation of a joint funding program for the purpose of addressing shared community  interests including, but not limited to, gang prevention and intervention through the Alive &  Free program.  Council concur.  (See 10.b. for resolution.)  h. Utility  Systems  Division  recommends  authorizing  the  Mayor  or  Mayor's  Designee  to  sign  deeds,  easements,  and  other  conveyance  documents  required  for  City  assumption  of  maintenance of 213 stormwater facilities in plats that manage run‐off from public streets as  required  by  the Residential  Plat  Stormwater  Management  Facility  Maintenance  Program.   Council concur.  9.UNFINISHED BUSINESS Topics listed below were discussed in Council committees during the past week.  Those topics  marked with an asterisk (*) may include legislation.  Committee reports on any topics may be held  by the Chair if further review is necessary. a. Committee of the Whole:  Fire Protection, Parks & Transportation Impact Fees Updates*  b. Finance Committee:  Electric Vehicle Charging Stations; Vouchers  c. Public Safety Committee:  MOU with Seattle‐King County Public Health to Store an Emergency  Preparedness Container*  d. Transportation  (Aviation)  Committee:   NE  3rd/4th  Corridor  Improvements  Agreement  with  Puget  Sound  Energy;  Architectural  Agreement  with  SRG  Partnership  for  Renton  Aerospace  Training  Center;  Lease  Amendment  with  Boeing;  Ground  Lease  with  Bosair,  LLC;  Six‐Year  Transportation Improvement Program*  10.RESOLUTIONS AND ORDINANCES Resolutions: a. Non‐participating  jurisdiction Valley  Special  Weapons  and  Tactics  (VSWAT)  Team interlocal agreements  (See 8.f.)  b. Memorandum of Understanding with Valley Cities Association regarding a joint funding  program  (See 8.g.)  c. Emergency preparedness container interlocal agreement with Seattle‐King County Public  Health  (See 9.c.)  d. Updating the Six‐Year Transportation Improvement Program 2013‐2018  (See 9.d.) Page 2 of 325 11.NEW BUSINESS (Includes Council Committee agenda topics; call 425‐430‐6512 for recorded information.) 12.AUDIENCE COMMENT   13.ADJOURNMENT COMMITTEE OF THE WHOLE AGENDA   (Preceding Council Meeting)     COUNCIL CHAMBERS   September 10, 2012  Monday, 6 p.m.    Impact Fees Update    • Hearing assistance devices for use in the Council Chambers are available upon request to the City Clerk •   CITY COUNCIL MEETINGS ARE TELEVISED LIVE ON GOVERNMENT ACCESS CHANNEL 21 AND ARE RECABLECAST:  Tues. & Thurs. at 11 AM & 9 PM, Wed. & Fri at 9 AM & 7 PM and Sat. & Sun. at 1 PM & 9 PM  Page 3 of 325 3 a .   ‐   M a y o r ' s   D a y   o f   C o n c e r n   f o r   t h e   H u n g r y   ‐   S e p t e m b e r   2 2 ,   2 0 1 2 P a g e 4 o f 3 2 5 3 b .   ‐   N a t i o n a l   R e c o v e r y   M o n t h   ‐   S e p t e m b e r   2 0 1 2 P a g e 5 o f 3 2 5 POTENTIAL IMPACT FEE UPDATE City exploring first increase in 18 years in order for “new growth to help pay for growth” Impact Fees: Are one-time fees paid by developers of new construction projects only. Have been in place in Renton since 1994, but the rates have never been adjusted despite the dramatic change that has occurred within the City. Are based on the anticipated impacts new construction projects have on the City. Contribute to costs of new infrastructure (fire stations and associated equipment, parks, and roads). Are only expended for physical improvements (fire stations and trucks, park land and improvements, and streets and sidewalks), not administrative, operating, or maintenance costs. Are an important financial tool that helps the City keep its infrastructure in pace with new development, while not compounding deficiencies and reducing the City’s overall levels of service. Without which, the City:  Would not be able to provide adequate infrastructure to support the demands of new development; or  Be forced to raise revenue by raising more generalized taxes. How are the new Fee Levels Being Established? An extensive Rate Analysis was conducted by a consultant with significant expertise across many jurisdictions using well-established methodology. (The Study is available on the City website, rentonwa.gov.) The Analysis establishes the true cost growth puts on the City’s planned infrastructure improvements. State Law allows the City to charge up to the full amount determined by the Analysis, but not more. A Measured Proposal: The Administration of the City recognizes that this is a challenging time for development. The nation is slowly emerging from significant recession. And, we hold firm to our commitment to economic development and seek to remain competitive with peer jurisdictions. However, we cannot allow our infrastructure to significantly erode. New growth must help pay a portion of the costs it creates. In attempt to balance this, the Administration is recommending the City Council adopt fees well below the rates justified in the Analysis. Fee Rate: Single Family Rate: Multi-Family Portion of Rate Study Fire $479.28 $479.28 2/3 of Rate Study Amount Parks $1,827.58 $1,239.92 2/3 of Rate Study Amount Transportation $2,856.89 $1,862.37 1/3 of Rate Study Amount Additionally, the Administration is recommending impact fees be increased gradually over a three-year period , with no increase until 2014, providing the development community predictability as to what fees will be charged and when. The Administration is also recommending the inclusion of an option to pay fees closer to the time of sale or occupancy to assist developers by reducing “carrying costs” during construction. The functionality and impacts of the deferral option will be reviewed by March 1, 2015. For additional information, please contact: Chip Vincent, Administrator/Planning Director, at 425.430.6588 or cvincent@rentonwa.gov. 5a. ‐ Updates to Fire Protection, Parks, and Transportation Impact Fees Page 6 of 325 CITY OF RENTON COUNCIL AGENDA BILL Subject/Title: Reappointment to Parks Commission - Larry Reymann and Troy Wigestrand Meeting: Regular Council - 10 Sep 2012 Exhibits: Memo to Mayor Law, Subject: Reappointments to Parks Commission Submitting Data: Dept/Div/Board: Executive Staff Contact: April Alexander, Executive Assistant, x6520 Recommended Action: Council concur Fiscal Impact: Expenditure Required: $ N/A Transfer Amendment: $N/A Amount Budgeted: $ N/A Revenue Generated: $N/A Total Project Budget: $ N/A City Share Total Project: $ N/A SUMMARY OF ACTION: Mayor Law reappoints the following to the Parks Commission: Mr. Larry Reymann, 1313 N. 38th Street, Renton, 98056, for a term expiring 6/1/2016 Mr. Troy Wigestrand, 2102 Queen Avenue NE, Renton, 98056, for a term expiring 6/1/2016 STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Concur with Mayor Law's reappointments of Mr. Reymann and Mr. Wigestrand to the Parks Commission. 8b. ‐ Mayor Law reappoints the following individuals to the Parks  Commission for terms expiring on 6/1/2016:  Larry Reymann and Troy  Page 7 of 325 8b. ‐ Mayor Law reappoints the following individuals to the Parks  Commission for terms expiring on 6/1/2016:  Larry Reymann and Troy  Page 8 of 325 CITY OF RENTON COUNCIL AGENDA BILL Subject/Title: Appeal of Hearing Examiner's Decision by Galloway at the Highlands attorney Talis Abolins, Campbell, Dille, Barnett & Smith, PLLC. regarding Lots 9, 10, 11, & 12 building permit impact fees. (File No. LUA-07-128 FP) Meeting: Regular Council - 10 Sep 2012 Exhibits: City Clerk’s Appeal notification letter (8/1/2012) Appeal to Council (7/19/2012) Hearing Examiners’ Decision/Response to Appeal of Impact Fee Assessment (7/9/2012) Appeal to Hearing Examiner (4/27/2012) Submitting Data: Dept/Div/Board: Administrative Services Staff Contact: Bonnie I. Walton, City Clerk Recommended Action: Refer to Planning and Development Committee Fiscal Impact: Expenditure Required: $ N/A Transfer Amendment: $N/A Amount Budgeted: $ N/A Revenue Generated: $N/A Total Project Budget: $ N/A City Share Total Project: $ N/A SUMMARY OF ACTION: Appeal of the Hearing Examiner’s decision on the Galloway at the Highlands (Lots 9, 10, 11, & 12) Final Plat was filed on 7/19/2012, by Galloway at the Highlands representative Talis Abolins of Campbell, Dille, Barnett & Smith, PLLC. accompanied by the required $250.00 fee. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Council to take action on the Galloway at the Highlands appeal. 8c. ‐ City Clerk reports appeal of Hearing Examiner's decision  regarding Lots 9, 10, 11, and 12 at the Galloway at the Highlands Final  Page 9 of 325 8c. ‐ City Clerk reports appeal of Hearing Examiner's decision  regarding Lots 9, 10, 11, and 12 at the Galloway at the Highlands Final  Page 10 of 325 8c. ‐ City Clerk reports appeal of Hearing Examiner's decision  regarding Lots 9, 10, 11, and 12 at the Galloway at the Highlands Final  Page 11 of 325 8c. ‐ City Clerk reports appeal of Hearing Examiner's decision  regarding Lots 9, 10, 11, and 12 at the Galloway at the Highlands Final  Page 12 of 325 8c. ‐ City Clerk reports appeal of Hearing Examiner's decision  regarding Lots 9, 10, 11, and 12 at the Galloway at the Highlands Final  Page 13 of 325 8c. ‐ City Clerk reports appeal of Hearing Examiner's decision  regarding Lots 9, 10, 11, and 12 at the Galloway at the Highlands Final  Page 14 of 325 8c. ‐ City Clerk reports appeal of Hearing Examiner's decision  regarding Lots 9, 10, 11, and 12 at the Galloway at the Highlands Final  Page 15 of 325 8c. ‐ City Clerk reports appeal of Hearing Examiner's decision  regarding Lots 9, 10, 11, and 12 at the Galloway at the Highlands Final  Page 16 of 325 8c. ‐ City Clerk reports appeal of Hearing Examiner's decision  regarding Lots 9, 10, 11, and 12 at the Galloway at the Highlands Final  Page 17 of 325 8c. ‐ City Clerk reports appeal of Hearing Examiner's decision  regarding Lots 9, 10, 11, and 12 at the Galloway at the Highlands Final  Page 18 of 325 8c. ‐ City Clerk reports appeal of Hearing Examiner's decision  regarding Lots 9, 10, 11, and 12 at the Galloway at the Highlands Final  Page 19 of 325 8c. ‐ City Clerk reports appeal of Hearing Examiner's decision  regarding Lots 9, 10, 11, and 12 at the Galloway at the Highlands Final  Page 20 of 325 8c. ‐ City Clerk reports appeal of Hearing Examiner's decision  regarding Lots 9, 10, 11, and 12 at the Galloway at the Highlands Final  Page 21 of 325 8c. ‐ City Clerk reports appeal of Hearing Examiner's decision  regarding Lots 9, 10, 11, and 12 at the Galloway at the Highlands Final  Page 22 of 325 8c. ‐ City Clerk reports appeal of Hearing Examiner's decision  regarding Lots 9, 10, 11, and 12 at the Galloway at the Highlands Final  Page 23 of 325 8c. ‐ City Clerk reports appeal of Hearing Examiner's decision  regarding Lots 9, 10, 11, and 12 at the Galloway at the Highlands Final  Page 24 of 325 8c. ‐ City Clerk reports appeal of Hearing Examiner's decision  regarding Lots 9, 10, 11, and 12 at the Galloway at the Highlands Final  Page 25 of 325 8c. ‐ City Clerk reports appeal of Hearing Examiner's decision  regarding Lots 9, 10, 11, and 12 at the Galloway at the Highlands Final  Page 26 of 325 8c. ‐ City Clerk reports appeal of Hearing Examiner's decision  regarding Lots 9, 10, 11, and 12 at the Galloway at the Highlands Final  Page 27 of 325 8c. ‐ City Clerk reports appeal of Hearing Examiner's decision  regarding Lots 9, 10, 11, and 12 at the Galloway at the Highlands Final  Page 28 of 325 8c. ‐ City Clerk reports appeal of Hearing Examiner's decision  regarding Lots 9, 10, 11, and 12 at the Galloway at the Highlands Final  Page 29 of 325 8c. ‐ City Clerk reports appeal of Hearing Examiner's decision  regarding Lots 9, 10, 11, and 12 at the Galloway at the Highlands Final  Page 30 of 325 8c. ‐ City Clerk reports appeal of Hearing Examiner's decision  regarding Lots 9, 10, 11, and 12 at the Galloway at the Highlands Final  Page 31 of 325 8c. ‐ City Clerk reports appeal of Hearing Examiner's decision  regarding Lots 9, 10, 11, and 12 at the Galloway at the Highlands Final  Page 32 of 325 8c. ‐ City Clerk reports appeal of Hearing Examiner's decision  regarding Lots 9, 10, 11, and 12 at the Galloway at the Highlands Final  Page 33 of 325 8c. ‐ City Clerk reports appeal of Hearing Examiner's decision  regarding Lots 9, 10, 11, and 12 at the Galloway at the Highlands Final  Page 34 of 325 8c. ‐ City Clerk reports appeal of Hearing Examiner's decision  regarding Lots 9, 10, 11, and 12 at the Galloway at the Highlands Final  Page 35 of 325 8c. ‐ City Clerk reports appeal of Hearing Examiner's decision  regarding Lots 9, 10, 11, and 12 at the Galloway at the Highlands Final  Page 36 of 325 8c. ‐ City Clerk reports appeal of Hearing Examiner's decision  regarding Lots 9, 10, 11, and 12 at the Galloway at the Highlands Final  Page 37 of 325 8c. ‐ City Clerk reports appeal of Hearing Examiner's decision  regarding Lots 9, 10, 11, and 12 at the Galloway at the Highlands Final  Page 38 of 325 8c. ‐ City Clerk reports appeal of Hearing Examiner's decision  regarding Lots 9, 10, 11, and 12 at the Galloway at the Highlands Final  Page 39 of 325 8c. ‐ City Clerk reports appeal of Hearing Examiner's decision  regarding Lots 9, 10, 11, and 12 at the Galloway at the Highlands Final  Page 40 of 325 8c. ‐ City Clerk reports appeal of Hearing Examiner's decision  regarding Lots 9, 10, 11, and 12 at the Galloway at the Highlands Final  Page 41 of 325 8c. ‐ City Clerk reports appeal of Hearing Examiner's decision  regarding Lots 9, 10, 11, and 12 at the Galloway at the Highlands Final  Page 42 of 325 8c. ‐ City Clerk reports appeal of Hearing Examiner's decision  regarding Lots 9, 10, 11, and 12 at the Galloway at the Highlands Final  Page 43 of 325 8c. ‐ City Clerk reports appeal of Hearing Examiner's decision  regarding Lots 9, 10, 11, and 12 at the Galloway at the Highlands Final  Page 44 of 325 8c. ‐ City Clerk reports appeal of Hearing Examiner's decision  regarding Lots 9, 10, 11, and 12 at the Galloway at the Highlands Final  Page 45 of 325 8c. ‐ City Clerk reports appeal of Hearing Examiner's decision  regarding Lots 9, 10, 11, and 12 at the Galloway at the Highlands Final  Page 46 of 325 8c. ‐ City Clerk reports appeal of Hearing Examiner's decision  regarding Lots 9, 10, 11, and 12 at the Galloway at the Highlands Final  Page 47 of 325 8c. ‐ City Clerk reports appeal of Hearing Examiner's decision  regarding Lots 9, 10, 11, and 12 at the Galloway at the Highlands Final  Page 48 of 325 8c. ‐ City Clerk reports appeal of Hearing Examiner's decision  regarding Lots 9, 10, 11, and 12 at the Galloway at the Highlands Final  Page 49 of 325 8c. ‐ City Clerk reports appeal of Hearing Examiner's decision  regarding Lots 9, 10, 11, and 12 at the Galloway at the Highlands Final  Page 50 of 325 8c. ‐ City Clerk reports appeal of Hearing Examiner's decision  regarding Lots 9, 10, 11, and 12 at the Galloway at the Highlands Final  Page 51 of 325 8c. ‐ City Clerk reports appeal of Hearing Examiner's decision  regarding Lots 9, 10, 11, and 12 at the Galloway at the Highlands Final  Page 52 of 325 8c. ‐ City Clerk reports appeal of Hearing Examiner's decision  regarding Lots 9, 10, 11, and 12 at the Galloway at the Highlands Final  Page 53 of 325 8c. ‐ City Clerk reports appeal of Hearing Examiner's decision  regarding Lots 9, 10, 11, and 12 at the Galloway at the Highlands Final  Page 54 of 325 8c. ‐ City Clerk reports appeal of Hearing Examiner's decision  regarding Lots 9, 10, 11, and 12 at the Galloway at the Highlands Final  Page 55 of 325 8c. ‐ City Clerk reports appeal of Hearing Examiner's decision  regarding Lots 9, 10, 11, and 12 at the Galloway at the Highlands Final  Page 56 of 325 8c. ‐ City Clerk reports appeal of Hearing Examiner's decision  regarding Lots 9, 10, 11, and 12 at the Galloway at the Highlands Final  Page 57 of 325 8c. ‐ City Clerk reports appeal of Hearing Examiner's decision  regarding Lots 9, 10, 11, and 12 at the Galloway at the Highlands Final  Page 58 of 325 8c. ‐ City Clerk reports appeal of Hearing Examiner's decision  regarding Lots 9, 10, 11, and 12 at the Galloway at the Highlands Final  Page 59 of 325 8c. ‐ City Clerk reports appeal of Hearing Examiner's decision  regarding Lots 9, 10, 11, and 12 at the Galloway at the Highlands Final  Page 60 of 325 8c. ‐ City Clerk reports appeal of Hearing Examiner's decision  regarding Lots 9, 10, 11, and 12 at the Galloway at the Highlands Final  Page 61 of 325 8c. ‐ City Clerk reports appeal of Hearing Examiner's decision  regarding Lots 9, 10, 11, and 12 at the Galloway at the Highlands Final  Page 62 of 325 8c. ‐ City Clerk reports appeal of Hearing Examiner's decision  regarding Lots 9, 10, 11, and 12 at the Galloway at the Highlands Final  Page 63 of 325 8c. ‐ City Clerk reports appeal of Hearing Examiner's decision  regarding Lots 9, 10, 11, and 12 at the Galloway at the Highlands Final  Page 64 of 325 8c. ‐ City Clerk reports appeal of Hearing Examiner's decision  regarding Lots 9, 10, 11, and 12 at the Galloway at the Highlands Final  Page 65 of 325 8c. ‐ City Clerk reports appeal of Hearing Examiner's decision  regarding Lots 9, 10, 11, and 12 at the Galloway at the Highlands Final  Page 66 of 325 8c. ‐ City Clerk reports appeal of Hearing Examiner's decision  regarding Lots 9, 10, 11, and 12 at the Galloway at the Highlands Final  Page 67 of 325 8c. ‐ City Clerk reports appeal of Hearing Examiner's decision  regarding Lots 9, 10, 11, and 12 at the Galloway at the Highlands Final  Page 68 of 325 8c. ‐ City Clerk reports appeal of Hearing Examiner's decision  regarding Lots 9, 10, 11, and 12 at the Galloway at the Highlands Final  Page 69 of 325 8c. ‐ City Clerk reports appeal of Hearing Examiner's decision  regarding Lots 9, 10, 11, and 12 at the Galloway at the Highlands Final  Page 70 of 325 8c. ‐ City Clerk reports appeal of Hearing Examiner's decision  regarding Lots 9, 10, 11, and 12 at the Galloway at the Highlands Final  Page 71 of 325 8c. ‐ City Clerk reports appeal of Hearing Examiner's decision  regarding Lots 9, 10, 11, and 12 at the Galloway at the Highlands Final  Page 72 of 325 8c. ‐ City Clerk reports appeal of Hearing Examiner's decision  regarding Lots 9, 10, 11, and 12 at the Galloway at the Highlands Final  Page 73 of 325 8c. ‐ City Clerk reports appeal of Hearing Examiner's decision  regarding Lots 9, 10, 11, and 12 at the Galloway at the Highlands Final  Page 74 of 325 8c. ‐ City Clerk reports appeal of Hearing Examiner's decision  regarding Lots 9, 10, 11, and 12 at the Galloway at the Highlands Final  Page 75 of 325 8c. ‐ City Clerk reports appeal of Hearing Examiner's decision  regarding Lots 9, 10, 11, and 12 at the Galloway at the Highlands Final  Page 76 of 325 8c. ‐ City Clerk reports appeal of Hearing Examiner's decision  regarding Lots 9, 10, 11, and 12 at the Galloway at the Highlands Final  Page 77 of 325 8c. ‐ City Clerk reports appeal of Hearing Examiner's decision  regarding Lots 9, 10, 11, and 12 at the Galloway at the Highlands Final  Page 78 of 325 8c. ‐ City Clerk reports appeal of Hearing Examiner's decision  regarding Lots 9, 10, 11, and 12 at the Galloway at the Highlands Final  Page 79 of 325 8c. ‐ City Clerk reports appeal of Hearing Examiner's decision  regarding Lots 9, 10, 11, and 12 at the Galloway at the Highlands Final  Page 80 of 325 8c. ‐ City Clerk reports appeal of Hearing Examiner's decision  regarding Lots 9, 10, 11, and 12 at the Galloway at the Highlands Final  Page 81 of 325 8c. ‐ City Clerk reports appeal of Hearing Examiner's decision  regarding Lots 9, 10, 11, and 12 at the Galloway at the Highlands Final  Page 82 of 325 8c. ‐ City Clerk reports appeal of Hearing Examiner's decision  regarding Lots 9, 10, 11, and 12 at the Galloway at the Highlands Final  Page 83 of 325 8c. ‐ City Clerk reports appeal of Hearing Examiner's decision  regarding Lots 9, 10, 11, and 12 at the Galloway at the Highlands Final  Page 84 of 325 8c. ‐ City Clerk reports appeal of Hearing Examiner's decision  regarding Lots 9, 10, 11, and 12 at the Galloway at the Highlands Final  Page 85 of 325 8c. ‐ City Clerk reports appeal of Hearing Examiner's decision  regarding Lots 9, 10, 11, and 12 at the Galloway at the Highlands Final  Page 86 of 325 8c. ‐ City Clerk reports appeal of Hearing Examiner's decision  regarding Lots 9, 10, 11, and 12 at the Galloway at the Highlands Final  Page 87 of 325 8c. ‐ City Clerk reports appeal of Hearing Examiner's decision  regarding Lots 9, 10, 11, and 12 at the Galloway at the Highlands Final  Page 88 of 325 8c. ‐ City Clerk reports appeal of Hearing Examiner's decision  regarding Lots 9, 10, 11, and 12 at the Galloway at the Highlands Final  Page 89 of 325 8c. ‐ City Clerk reports appeal of Hearing Examiner's decision  regarding Lots 9, 10, 11, and 12 at the Galloway at the Highlands Final  Page 90 of 325 8c. ‐ City Clerk reports appeal of Hearing Examiner's decision  regarding Lots 9, 10, 11, and 12 at the Galloway at the Highlands Final  Page 91 of 325 8c. ‐ City Clerk reports appeal of Hearing Examiner's decision  regarding Lots 9, 10, 11, and 12 at the Galloway at the Highlands Final  Page 92 of 325 8c. ‐ City Clerk reports appeal of Hearing Examiner's decision  regarding Lots 9, 10, 11, and 12 at the Galloway at the Highlands Final  Page 93 of 325 8c. ‐ City Clerk reports appeal of Hearing Examiner's decision  regarding Lots 9, 10, 11, and 12 at the Galloway at the Highlands Final  Page 94 of 325 8c. ‐ City Clerk reports appeal of Hearing Examiner's decision  regarding Lots 9, 10, 11, and 12 at the Galloway at the Highlands Final  Page 95 of 325 8c. ‐ City Clerk reports appeal of Hearing Examiner's decision  regarding Lots 9, 10, 11, and 12 at the Galloway at the Highlands Final  Page 96 of 325 8c. ‐ City Clerk reports appeal of Hearing Examiner's decision  regarding Lots 9, 10, 11, and 12 at the Galloway at the Highlands Final  Page 97 of 325 8c. ‐ City Clerk reports appeal of Hearing Examiner's decision  regarding Lots 9, 10, 11, and 12 at the Galloway at the Highlands Final  Page 98 of 325 8c. ‐ City Clerk reports appeal of Hearing Examiner's decision  regarding Lots 9, 10, 11, and 12 at the Galloway at the Highlands Final  Page 99 of 325 8c. ‐ City Clerk reports appeal of Hearing Examiner's decision  regarding Lots 9, 10, 11, and 12 at the Galloway at the Highlands Final  Page 100 of 325 8c. ‐ City Clerk reports appeal of Hearing Examiner's decision  regarding Lots 9, 10, 11, and 12 at the Galloway at the Highlands Final  Page 101 of 325 8c. ‐ City Clerk reports appeal of Hearing Examiner's decision  regarding Lots 9, 10, 11, and 12 at the Galloway at the Highlands Final  Page 102 of 325 8c. ‐ City Clerk reports appeal of Hearing Examiner's decision  regarding Lots 9, 10, 11, and 12 at the Galloway at the Highlands Final  Page 103 of 325 8c. ‐ City Clerk reports appeal of Hearing Examiner's decision  regarding Lots 9, 10, 11, and 12 at the Galloway at the Highlands Final  Page 104 of 325 8c. ‐ City Clerk reports appeal of Hearing Examiner's decision  regarding Lots 9, 10, 11, and 12 at the Galloway at the Highlands Final  Page 105 of 325 8c. ‐ City Clerk reports appeal of Hearing Examiner's decision  regarding Lots 9, 10, 11, and 12 at the Galloway at the Highlands Final  Page 106 of 325 8c. ‐ City Clerk reports appeal of Hearing Examiner's decision  regarding Lots 9, 10, 11, and 12 at the Galloway at the Highlands Final  Page 107 of 325 8c. ‐ City Clerk reports appeal of Hearing Examiner's decision  regarding Lots 9, 10, 11, and 12 at the Galloway at the Highlands Final  Page 108 of 325 8c. ‐ City Clerk reports appeal of Hearing Examiner's decision  regarding Lots 9, 10, 11, and 12 at the Galloway at the Highlands Final  Page 109 of 325 8c. ‐ City Clerk reports appeal of Hearing Examiner's decision  regarding Lots 9, 10, 11, and 12 at the Galloway at the Highlands Final  Page 110 of 325 8c. ‐ City Clerk reports appeal of Hearing Examiner's decision  regarding Lots 9, 10, 11, and 12 at the Galloway at the Highlands Final  Page 111 of 325 8c. ‐ City Clerk reports appeal of Hearing Examiner's decision  regarding Lots 9, 10, 11, and 12 at the Galloway at the Highlands Final  Page 112 of 325 8c. ‐ City Clerk reports appeal of Hearing Examiner's decision  regarding Lots 9, 10, 11, and 12 at the Galloway at the Highlands Final  Page 113 of 325 8c. ‐ City Clerk reports appeal of Hearing Examiner's decision  regarding Lots 9, 10, 11, and 12 at the Galloway at the Highlands Final  Page 114 of 325 8c. ‐ City Clerk reports appeal of Hearing Examiner's decision  regarding Lots 9, 10, 11, and 12 at the Galloway at the Highlands Final  Page 115 of 325 8c. ‐ City Clerk reports appeal of Hearing Examiner's decision  regarding Lots 9, 10, 11, and 12 at the Galloway at the Highlands Final  Page 116 of 325 8c. ‐ City Clerk reports appeal of Hearing Examiner's decision  regarding Lots 9, 10, 11, and 12 at the Galloway at the Highlands Final  Page 117 of 325 8c. ‐ City Clerk reports appeal of Hearing Examiner's decision  regarding Lots 9, 10, 11, and 12 at the Galloway at the Highlands Final  Page 118 of 325 8c. ‐ City Clerk reports appeal of Hearing Examiner's decision  regarding Lots 9, 10, 11, and 12 at the Galloway at the Highlands Final  Page 119 of 325 8c. ‐ City Clerk reports appeal of Hearing Examiner's decision  regarding Lots 9, 10, 11, and 12 at the Galloway at the Highlands Final  Page 120 of 325 8c. ‐ City Clerk reports appeal of Hearing Examiner's decision  regarding Lots 9, 10, 11, and 12 at the Galloway at the Highlands Final  Page 121 of 325 8c. ‐ City Clerk reports appeal of Hearing Examiner's decision  regarding Lots 9, 10, 11, and 12 at the Galloway at the Highlands Final  Page 122 of 325 8c. ‐ City Clerk reports appeal of Hearing Examiner's decision  regarding Lots 9, 10, 11, and 12 at the Galloway at the Highlands Final  Page 123 of 325 8c. ‐ City Clerk reports appeal of Hearing Examiner's decision  regarding Lots 9, 10, 11, and 12 at the Galloway at the Highlands Final  Page 124 of 325 8c. ‐ City Clerk reports appeal of Hearing Examiner's decision  regarding Lots 9, 10, 11, and 12 at the Galloway at the Highlands Final  Page 125 of 325 8c. ‐ City Clerk reports appeal of Hearing Examiner's decision  regarding Lots 9, 10, 11, and 12 at the Galloway at the Highlands Final  Page 126 of 325 8c. ‐ City Clerk reports appeal of Hearing Examiner's decision  regarding Lots 9, 10, 11, and 12 at the Galloway at the Highlands Final  Page 127 of 325 8c. ‐ City Clerk reports appeal of Hearing Examiner's decision  regarding Lots 9, 10, 11, and 12 at the Galloway at the Highlands Final  Page 128 of 325 8c. ‐ City Clerk reports appeal of Hearing Examiner's decision  regarding Lots 9, 10, 11, and 12 at the Galloway at the Highlands Final  Page 129 of 325 8c. ‐ City Clerk reports appeal of Hearing Examiner's decision  regarding Lots 9, 10, 11, and 12 at the Galloway at the Highlands Final  Page 130 of 325 8c. ‐ City Clerk reports appeal of Hearing Examiner's decision  regarding Lots 9, 10, 11, and 12 at the Galloway at the Highlands Final  Page 131 of 325 8c. ‐ City Clerk reports appeal of Hearing Examiner's decision  regarding Lots 9, 10, 11, and 12 at the Galloway at the Highlands Final  Page 132 of 325 8c. ‐ City Clerk reports appeal of Hearing Examiner's decision  regarding Lots 9, 10, 11, and 12 at the Galloway at the Highlands Final  Page 133 of 325 8c. ‐ City Clerk reports appeal of Hearing Examiner's decision  regarding Lots 9, 10, 11, and 12 at the Galloway at the Highlands Final  Page 134 of 325 8c. ‐ City Clerk reports appeal of Hearing Examiner's decision  regarding Lots 9, 10, 11, and 12 at the Galloway at the Highlands Final  Page 135 of 325 8c. ‐ City Clerk reports appeal of Hearing Examiner's decision  regarding Lots 9, 10, 11, and 12 at the Galloway at the Highlands Final  Page 136 of 325 8c. ‐ City Clerk reports appeal of Hearing Examiner's decision  regarding Lots 9, 10, 11, and 12 at the Galloway at the Highlands Final  Page 137 of 325 8c. ‐ City Clerk reports appeal of Hearing Examiner's decision  regarding Lots 9, 10, 11, and 12 at the Galloway at the Highlands Final  Page 138 of 325 8c. ‐ City Clerk reports appeal of Hearing Examiner's decision  regarding Lots 9, 10, 11, and 12 at the Galloway at the Highlands Final  Page 139 of 325 8c. ‐ City Clerk reports appeal of Hearing Examiner's decision  regarding Lots 9, 10, 11, and 12 at the Galloway at the Highlands Final  Page 140 of 325 8c. ‐ City Clerk reports appeal of Hearing Examiner's decision  regarding Lots 9, 10, 11, and 12 at the Galloway at the Highlands Final  Page 141 of 325 8c. ‐ City Clerk reports appeal of Hearing Examiner's decision  regarding Lots 9, 10, 11, and 12 at the Galloway at the Highlands Final  Page 142 of 325 8c. ‐ City Clerk reports appeal of Hearing Examiner's decision  regarding Lots 9, 10, 11, and 12 at the Galloway at the Highlands Final  Page 143 of 325 8c. ‐ City Clerk reports appeal of Hearing Examiner's decision  regarding Lots 9, 10, 11, and 12 at the Galloway at the Highlands Final  Page 144 of 325 8c. ‐ City Clerk reports appeal of Hearing Examiner's decision  regarding Lots 9, 10, 11, and 12 at the Galloway at the Highlands Final  Page 145 of 325 8c. ‐ City Clerk reports appeal of Hearing Examiner's decision  regarding Lots 9, 10, 11, and 12 at the Galloway at the Highlands Final  Page 146 of 325 8c. ‐ City Clerk reports appeal of Hearing Examiner's decision  regarding Lots 9, 10, 11, and 12 at the Galloway at the Highlands Final  Page 147 of 325 8c. ‐ City Clerk reports appeal of Hearing Examiner's decision  regarding Lots 9, 10, 11, and 12 at the Galloway at the Highlands Final  Page 148 of 325 8c. ‐ City Clerk reports appeal of Hearing Examiner's decision  regarding Lots 9, 10, 11, and 12 at the Galloway at the Highlands Final  Page 149 of 325 8c. ‐ City Clerk reports appeal of Hearing Examiner's decision  regarding Lots 9, 10, 11, and 12 at the Galloway at the Highlands Final  Page 150 of 325 8c. ‐ City Clerk reports appeal of Hearing Examiner's decision  regarding Lots 9, 10, 11, and 12 at the Galloway at the Highlands Final  Page 151 of 325 8c. ‐ City Clerk reports appeal of Hearing Examiner's decision  regarding Lots 9, 10, 11, and 12 at the Galloway at the Highlands Final  Page 152 of 325 8c. ‐ City Clerk reports appeal of Hearing Examiner's decision  regarding Lots 9, 10, 11, and 12 at the Galloway at the Highlands Final  Page 153 of 325 8c. ‐ City Clerk reports appeal of Hearing Examiner's decision  regarding Lots 9, 10, 11, and 12 at the Galloway at the Highlands Final  Page 154 of 325 8c. ‐ City Clerk reports appeal of Hearing Examiner's decision  regarding Lots 9, 10, 11, and 12 at the Galloway at the Highlands Final  Page 155 of 325 8c. ‐ City Clerk reports appeal of Hearing Examiner's decision  regarding Lots 9, 10, 11, and 12 at the Galloway at the Highlands Final  Page 156 of 325 8c. ‐ City Clerk reports appeal of Hearing Examiner's decision  regarding Lots 9, 10, 11, and 12 at the Galloway at the Highlands Final  Page 157 of 325 8c. ‐ City Clerk reports appeal of Hearing Examiner's decision  regarding Lots 9, 10, 11, and 12 at the Galloway at the Highlands Final  Page 158 of 325 8c. ‐ City Clerk reports appeal of Hearing Examiner's decision  regarding Lots 9, 10, 11, and 12 at the Galloway at the Highlands Final  Page 159 of 325 8c. ‐ City Clerk reports appeal of Hearing Examiner's decision  regarding Lots 9, 10, 11, and 12 at the Galloway at the Highlands Final  Page 160 of 325 8c. ‐ City Clerk reports appeal of Hearing Examiner's decision  regarding Lots 9, 10, 11, and 12 at the Galloway at the Highlands Final  Page 161 of 325 8c. ‐ City Clerk reports appeal of Hearing Examiner's decision  regarding Lots 9, 10, 11, and 12 at the Galloway at the Highlands Final  Page 162 of 325 8c. ‐ City Clerk reports appeal of Hearing Examiner's decision  regarding Lots 9, 10, 11, and 12 at the Galloway at the Highlands Final  Page 163 of 325 8c. ‐ City Clerk reports appeal of Hearing Examiner's decision  regarding Lots 9, 10, 11, and 12 at the Galloway at the Highlands Final  Page 164 of 325 8c. ‐ City Clerk reports appeal of Hearing Examiner's decision  regarding Lots 9, 10, 11, and 12 at the Galloway at the Highlands Final  Page 165 of 325 8c. ‐ City Clerk reports appeal of Hearing Examiner's decision  regarding Lots 9, 10, 11, and 12 at the Galloway at the Highlands Final  Page 166 of 325 8c. ‐ City Clerk reports appeal of Hearing Examiner's decision  regarding Lots 9, 10, 11, and 12 at the Galloway at the Highlands Final  Page 167 of 325 8c. ‐ City Clerk reports appeal of Hearing Examiner's decision  regarding Lots 9, 10, 11, and 12 at the Galloway at the Highlands Final  Page 168 of 325 8c. ‐ City Clerk reports appeal of Hearing Examiner's decision  regarding Lots 9, 10, 11, and 12 at the Galloway at the Highlands Final  Page 169 of 325 8c. ‐ City Clerk reports appeal of Hearing Examiner's decision  regarding Lots 9, 10, 11, and 12 at the Galloway at the Highlands Final  Page 170 of 325 8c. ‐ City Clerk reports appeal of Hearing Examiner's decision  regarding Lots 9, 10, 11, and 12 at the Galloway at the Highlands Final  Page 171 of 325 8c. ‐ City Clerk reports appeal of Hearing Examiner's decision  regarding Lots 9, 10, 11, and 12 at the Galloway at the Highlands Final  Page 172 of 325 8c. ‐ City Clerk reports appeal of Hearing Examiner's decision  regarding Lots 9, 10, 11, and 12 at the Galloway at the Highlands Final  Page 173 of 325 8c. ‐ City Clerk reports appeal of Hearing Examiner's decision  regarding Lots 9, 10, 11, and 12 at the Galloway at the Highlands Final  Page 174 of 325 8c. ‐ City Clerk reports appeal of Hearing Examiner's decision  regarding Lots 9, 10, 11, and 12 at the Galloway at the Highlands Final  Page 175 of 325 CITY OF RENTON COUNCIL AGENDA BILL Subject/Title: Fire Station 16 Ownership Transfer Meeting: Regular Council - 10 Sep 2012 Exhibits: 1995 Interlocal Agreement and Amendment 1 and 2. Submitting Data: Dept/Div/Board: Administrative Services Staff Contact: Iwen Wang, Administrator Recommended Action: Council Concur Fiscal Impact: Expenditure Required: $ Transfer Amendment: $ Amount Budgeted: $ Revenue Generated: $ Total Project Budget: $ City Share Total Project: $ SUMMARY OF ACTION: Fire District 25 (District) and the City of Renton entered into an interlocal service agreement in 1995 for the City to provide fire and emergency medical services to the District ("Agreement"). The Agreement was effective on January 1, 1996 for a 10-year period. Section 1.2 titled Payment by District identified certain real and personal properties to be transferred to the City at the end of the 10-year contract term with the exception that the District to retain 10% interest on Fire Station 16. The agreement was subsequently amended in 2006, extending the term to 12 years; and again in 2007. Section 2 of the 2007 amendment addresses “transfer of remaining assets at the end of twelve (12) years. This provision will be in effect until December 31, 2009, and is amended to include additional capitalized equipment purchased since 1996." Therefore, by the end of 2007 all distrct's assets, inclduing thsoe acquired since 1996, shall be owned by the City of Renton. All personal properties (equipment and apparatus) located at Fire Station 16 are now owned by the City; but the title of the real property (Station 16) has never been transferred. This Quit-Claim Deed will transfer all the interests the District has on station 16 to the City. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Accept and authorize the Mayor and City Clerk to execute the Quit-Claim Deed with King County to perfect the ownership transfer of Fire Station 16. 8d. ‐ Administrative Services Department recommends accepting a Quit‐ Claim Deed with King County Fire Protection District No. 25  Page 176 of 325 8d. ‐ Administrative Services Department recommends accepting a Quit‐ Claim Deed with King County Fire Protection District No. 25  Page 177 of 325 8d. ‐ Administrative Services Department recommends accepting a Quit‐ Claim Deed with King County Fire Protection District No. 25  Page 178 of 325 8d. ‐ Administrative Services Department recommends accepting a Quit‐ Claim Deed with King County Fire Protection District No. 25  Page 179 of 325 8d. ‐ Administrative Services Department recommends accepting a Quit‐ Claim Deed with King County Fire Protection District No. 25  Page 180 of 325 8d. ‐ Administrative Services Department recommends accepting a Quit‐ Claim Deed with King County Fire Protection District No. 25  Page 181 of 325 8d. ‐ Administrative Services Department recommends accepting a Quit‐ Claim Deed with King County Fire Protection District No. 25  Page 182 of 325 8d. ‐ Administrative Services Department recommends accepting a Quit‐ Claim Deed with King County Fire Protection District No. 25  Page 183 of 325 8d. ‐ Administrative Services Department recommends accepting a Quit‐ Claim Deed with King County Fire Protection District No. 25  Page 184 of 325 8d. ‐ Administrative Services Department recommends accepting a Quit‐ Claim Deed with King County Fire Protection District No. 25  Page 185 of 325 8d. ‐ Administrative Services Department recommends accepting a Quit‐ Claim Deed with King County Fire Protection District No. 25  Page 186 of 325 8d. ‐ Administrative Services Department recommends accepting a Quit‐ Claim Deed with King County Fire Protection District No. 25  Page 187 of 325 8d. ‐ Administrative Services Department recommends accepting a Quit‐ Claim Deed with King County Fire Protection District No. 25  Page 188 of 325 8d. ‐ Administrative Services Department recommends accepting a Quit‐ Claim Deed with King County Fire Protection District No. 25  Page 189 of 325 8d. ‐ Administrative Services Department recommends accepting a Quit‐ Claim Deed with King County Fire Protection District No. 25  Page 190 of 325 8d. ‐ Administrative Services Department recommends accepting a Quit‐ Claim Deed with King County Fire Protection District No. 25  Page 191 of 325 8d. ‐ Administrative Services Department recommends accepting a Quit‐ Claim Deed with King County Fire Protection District No. 25  Page 192 of 325 8d. ‐ Administrative Services Department recommends accepting a Quit‐ Claim Deed with King County Fire Protection District No. 25  Page 193 of 325 CITY OF RENTON COUNCIL AGENDA BILL Subject/Title: American Traffic Solutions - Addendum to CAG-07- 166 Meeting: Regular Council - 10 Sep 2012 Exhibits: Issue Paper Addendum to CAG-07-166 2 Submitting Data: Dept/Div/Board: Police Staff Contact: Clark Wilcox, x7597 Recommended Action: Council Concur Fiscal Impact: Expenditure Required: $ 2,251,980 - for entire 5 year extension Transfer Amendment: $ Amount Budgeted: $ 2,400,230 - for entire 5 year extension Revenue Generated: $ 7,120,765 - projected income over 5 year extension Total Project Budget: $ City Share Total Project: $ SUMMARY OF ACTION: ATS has provided photo enforcement services since September 2007. The contract provides two fixed school zone speed cameras at McKnight Middle School, Renton High School and Talbot Hill Elementary School for a total of six fixed school zone speed cameras. The contract also provides photo enforcement at the following intersections: W/B N. 3rd @ Sunset Blvd N, S/B Sunset Blvd N @ Bronson Way N, W/B S Grady Way @ Rainier Ave S, S/B Rainier Ave S @ SW Grady Way/S Grady Way, E/B SW Grady Way/S Grady Way @ Rainier Ave S, S/B East Valley Road @ SW 43rd Street, for a total of six red light photo enforcement approaches. Additionally, we have on-call services that provide maintenance and calibration for each camera. The contract also includes validation and billing services by ATS. There is no change to the current contract which was in affect for five years with a five year renewal option. The total amount paid to ATS for their services from September 2007 through June 31, 2012 was $1,749,839. The amount of revenue the City of Renton received during this time period was $5,370,926. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Approve the Addendum to CAG-07-166 to extend the current Professional Services Agreement between American Traffic Solutions, Inc. and the City of Renton for an additional five (5) years and authorize the Mayor and City Clerk to sign the Addendum. 8e. ‐ Police Department recommends approval of an addendum to CAG‐ 07‐166, with American Traffic Solutions, Inc. to extend the term of the Page 194 of 325 POLICE DEPARTMENT M E M O R A N D U M DATE:August 14, 2012 TO:Rich Zwicker, Council President Members of the Renton City Council VIA:Denis Law, Mayor FROM:Kevin Milosevich, Chief of Police STAFF CONTACT:Clark Wilcox, Commander (x 7597) SUBJECT:Issue Paper – American Traffic Solutions ISSUE: Should the City of Renton continue its contract with American Traffic Solutions Inc. to provide Photo Enforcement services for Renton Schools and intersections within the city limits of Renton? BACKGROUND: ATS has provided photo enforcement services since September 2007. The contract provides two fixed school zone speed cameras at McKnight Middle School, Renton High School and Talbot Hill Elementary School for a total of six fixed school zone speed cameras. The contract also provides photo enforcement at the following intersections: W/B N. 3rd @ Sunset Blvd N, S/B Sunset Blvd N @ Bronson Way N, W/B S Gray Way @ Rainier Ave S, S/B Rainier Ave S @ SW Grady Way/S Grady Way, E/B SW Grady Way/S Grady Way @ Rainier Ave S, S/B East Valley Road @ SW 43rd Street, for a total of six red light photo enforcement approaches. Additionally, we have on-call services that provide maintenance and calibration for each camera. The contract also includes validation and billing services by ATS. There is no change to the current contract which was in affect for five years with a five year renewal option. The total amount paid to ATS for their services from September 2007 through June 31, 2012 was $1,749,839. The amount of revenue the City of Renton received during this time period was $5,370,926. STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS: Council concur with the recommendation of City Administration to approve a five year extension of the Professional Services Agreement with American Traffic Solutions. 8e. ‐ Police Department recommends approval of an addendum to CAG‐ 07‐166, with American Traffic Solutions, Inc. to extend the term of the Page 195 of 325 City of Renton Professional Services Agreement Traffic Safety Camera System Addendum to CAG-07-166 The City of Renton, a Washington Municipal Corporation (the “City”) and American Traffic Solutions, Inc. (the “Consultant”) hereby mutually agree to exercise the right to extend the term of the Traffic Safety Camera System agreement (City contract number CAG-07-166), dated September 5, 2007 for an additional five (5) years for a total contract term of ten (10) years. CITY OF RENTON WASHINGTON By: _______________________________ Dennis Law, Mayor __________________________________ Date American Traffic Solutions, Inc. By: _______________________________ Michael Bolton Its Chief Operating Officer __________________________________ Date ATTEST: By: _______________________________ Bonnie Walton, City Clerk __________________________________ Date APPROVED AS TO FORM: By: _______________________________ Lawrence J. Warren, City Attorney __________________________________ Date 8e. ‐ Police Department recommends approval of an addendum to CAG‐ 07‐166, with American Traffic Solutions, Inc. to extend the term of the Page 196 of 325 CITY OF RENTON COUNCIL AGENDA BILL Subject/Title: Interlocal Agreement for Services of VSWAT to Non-Participating Jurisdictions Meeting: Regular Council - 10 Sep 2012 Exhibits: Issue Paper Interlocal Agreement for Services of Valley Special Weapons and Tactics Team to Non-Participating Jurisdiction Resolution Submitting Data: Dept/Div/Board: Police Staff Contact: Kent Curry, x7555 Recommended Action: Council Concur Fiscal Impact: Expenditure Required: $ NA Transfer Amendment: $NA Amount Budgeted: $ NA Revenue Generated: $NA Total Project Budget: $ NA City Share Total Project: $ NA SUMMARY OF ACTION: Approval to enter into Interlocal Agreement between the City of Renton and agencies requesting the services of the Valley Special Weapons and Tactics team, to establish the terms that will govern the rights, duties and responsibilities of the agencies in their dealings with each other regarding the provision of services by the Valley Special Weapons and Tactics team to those jurisdictions that are non-participants in the Valley Special Weapons and Tactics team. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Approve the Interlocal Agreement for Services of Valley Special Weapons and Tactics Team to Non- participating Jurisdictions and authorize the Mayor and City Clerk to sign the Interlocal Agreement. 8f. ‐ Police Department recommends approval of interlocal agreements  with non‐participating jurisdictions for the provision of Valley Special  Page 197 of 325 POLICE DEPARTMENT M E M O R A N D U M DATE:August 23, 2012 TO: VIA: Rich Zwicker, Council President Members of the Renton City Council Denis Law, Mayor FROM: STAFF CONTACT: Kevin Milosevich, Chief Kent Curry, Commander (x7555) SUBJECT:Interlocal Agreements With Government Agencies for the Valley Special Weapons and Tactics (VSWAT) Team to Provide VSWAT Services on an “As Needed” Basis. ISSUE: Should the Council authorize the Mayor and City Clerk to enter into Interlocal Agreements between the City of Renton and agencies requesting the services of the Valley Special Weapons and Tactics team, to establish the terms that will govern the rights, duties, and responsibilities of the agencies in their dealings with each other regarding the provision of services by the Valley Special Weapons and Tactics team to those jurisdictions that are non participants in the Valley Special Weapons and Tactics team. RECOMMENDATION: Council concur to approve the form of agreement attached hereto as Exhibit A, which sets out the standards to be observed when deciding whether to render aid. Authorize the Mayor and City Clerk to enter into Interlocal Agreements between the City of Renton and non-participating agencies of Valley Special Weapons and Tactics with regards to the provision of services by said team. BACKGROUND: The municipalities of Auburn, Federal Way, Kent, Renton, Tukwila, and the Port of Seattle have, by Interlocal Agreement, formed a multi-jurisdictional team, known as the Valley Special Weapons and Tactics Team (VSWAT) to respond to high risk criminal occurrences. The police chiefs of the participating agencies have formed an Operations Board to oversee the operations of the VSWAT. 8f. ‐ Police Department recommends approval of interlocal agreements  with non‐participating jurisdictions for the provision of Valley Special  Page 198 of 325 Page 2 of 2 August 23, 2012 There are numerous other jurisdictions in King County that are not participants in the VSWAT and that do not have the resources to form an independent SWAT. From time to time those non-participating agencies require such specially trained personnel to address extra-ordinary law enforcement needs. The police chiefs of the participating agencies have authorized VSWAT to provide assistance to non-participating jurisdictions pursuant to the Mutual Aid Peace Officers Powers Act, RCW 10.93, without any written agreement with the requesting non-participating agency. The VSWAT Operations Board has determined that as these requests become more frequent, and before aid is provided to any non-participating jurisdiction, there should be a written agreement with any non-participating jurisdiction regarding the provision of aid by the VSWAT. The agreement establishes the rights, duties, and responsibilities of the agencies in their dealings with each other. The participating agencies, and their legislative bodies, when necessary, have reviewed and approved the form of agreement attached hereto as Exhibit A, which sets out the standards to be observed when deciding whether to render aid. The VSWAT Operations Board will adhere to the standards set out in Exhibit A, thus eliminating the need to return to the City Council for approval of any agreement that is, in form and substance, consistent with Exhibit A. 8f. ‐ Police Department recommends approval of interlocal agreements  with non‐participating jurisdictions for the provision of Valley Special  Page 199 of 325 VSWAT ILA for non participating agency Page 1 of 7 INTERLOCAL AGREEMENT FOR SERVICES OF VALLEY SPECIAL WEAPONS AND TACTICS TEAM TO ______________(NON-PARTICIPATING JURISDICTION) THIS INTERLOCAL AGREEMENT is effective upon the date executed by all parties. In consideration of the mutual covenants below, the parties agree as follows: 1. PARTIES. The parties to this Agreement are ________(non-participating jurisdiction), a political subdivision of the State of Washington, and the municipalities of Auburn, Federal Way, Kent, Renton, and Tukwila, each of which is a municipal corporation, and the Port of Seattle, a port district, operating under the laws of the State of Washington. 2. AUTHORITY. This Agreement is entered into pursuant to Chapters 10.93 (Washington mutual aid peace officers powers act) and 39.34 (Interlocal Cooperation Act) of the Revised Code of Washington. 3. PURPOSE. The (non-participating jurisdiction) does not participate in the Valley Special Weapons and Tactics Team (“VSWAT”), but desires to have the VSWAT available to respond to serious criminal occurrences in its jurisdiction, if necessary. Auburn, Federal Way, Kent, Renton, Tukwila, and the Port of Seattle, have previously executed an interlocal agreement to organize and operate the VSWAT and might agree to allow the VSWAT to assist the (non-participating jurisdiction) under certain circumstances. This Agreement is intended to reflect the applicable terms and conditions between the parties if the VSWAT's services are provided to the (non-participating jurisdiction). 4. DURATION AND TERMINATION. The term of this Agreement shall be effective through December 31, 2012. This Agreement shall automatically extend for consecutive one (1) year terms, unless earlier terminated pursuant to the terms of this Agreement. Any party to this Agreement may terminate this Agreement by providing written notice of its intent to terminate to all other parties. A notice of termination shall become effective thirty (30) days after service of the notice on the contract representatives, set forth below, for all other parties. In the event that a party does not generally and consistently comply with the commitments outlined in this Agreement, the issue will be presented to the VSWAT Operations Board for final resolution. Remedies may include establishing a timeline for compliance, a temporary reduction in involvement for a prescribed period of time, or termination of the Agreement. 5. REQUEST FOR ASSISTANCE. The Chief of Police for (non-participating jurisdiction) or any commissioned officer who is expressly authorized herein may request the assistance and services of the VSWAT. Such request shall be directed to the Lead VSWAT Commander. The VSWAT may or may not agree to provide its services, at the 8f. ‐ Police Department recommends approval of interlocal agreements  with non‐participating jurisdictions for the provision of Valley Special  Page 200 of 325 VSWAT ILA for non participating agency Page 2 of 7 sole discretion of the Lead VSWAT Commander. The Lead VSWAT Commander may refer to the Callout Criteria of the Valley SWAT Team Policy Manual and any other relevant considerations when deciding whether to provide the services of the VSWAT. Nothing in this Agreement shall be deemed to obligate Auburn, Federal Way, Kent, Renton, Tukwila, or the Port of Seattle, to make their members of the VSWAT available to the (non-participating jurisdiction). (name & rank or position) or (name & rank or position) is authorized to request VSWAT assistance on behalf of (non-participating jurisdiction). 6. CHAIN OF COMMAND. If the request for assistance and services is granted, the (non-participating jurisdiction) representative shall notify the Lead VSWAT Commander of the identity of a command level officer from the (non-participating jurisdiction) who shall act as the Incident Commander for the (non-participating jurisdiction) (hereinafter “Incident Commander”). The Incident Commander for (non-participating jurisdiction) shall assume overall command and responsibility for the incident. The Incident Commander shall establish a command post outside the inner perimeter away from the suspect's line of sight and fire. The Incident Commander shall consult with the VSWAT Tactical Commander and evaluate the tactical options presented by the VSWAT Tactical Commander. Once the Incident Commander has authorized a tactical plan to accomplish the mission, the VSWAT Tactical Commander assumes command with respect to the implementation of the plan. If the Incident Commander and VSWAT Tactical Commander cannot agree on a tactical plan, the VSWAT shall leave the scene. (non-participating jurisdiction) shall then handle the situation with its own resources. 7. VSWAT OPERATIONS. If the VSWAT's services are provided to the (non-participating jurisdiction) the team will generally operate in accordance with the Valley SWAT Team Policy Manual, with any modifications deemed appropriate by the VSWAT Tactical Commander for the circumstances. 8. COMPENSATION. (non-participating jurisdiction) agrees to reimburse the other parties to this Agreement for all reasonable and necessary costs incurred in connection with the provision of services by the VSWAT as a result of the VSWAT call-out to the (non-participating jurisdiction) including, but not limited to, the cost of repairing or replacing any property, and all incidental expenses incurred by the VSWAT team members in providing services pursuant to the request for services by (non-participating jurisdiction). 8f. ‐ Police Department recommends approval of interlocal agreements  with non‐participating jurisdictions for the provision of Valley Special  Page 201 of 325 VSWAT ILA for non participating agency Page 3 of 7 9. ACCEPTANCE OF LIABILITY BY (non-participating jurisdiction). (non-participating jurisdiction) agrees that any liability or claim arising out of the actions or inactions of the members of the VSWAT acting within the course and scope of their duties when the VSWAT provides services at the request of (non-participating jurisdiction) shall be the responsibility of (non-participating jurisdiction) . This provision is intended to expressly allocate liability bywritten agreement as authorized by RCW 10.93.040 and is controlling over the default liabilityallocation set forth in RCW 10.93.040. This provision is not intended to require indemnificationor payment of any judgment against any individual or party for intentional wrongful conductoutside the scope of employment of any member of the VSWAT or of any judgment for punitivedamages against a VSWAT member or party to this Agreement. Payment of punitive damages,if any, shall be the sole responsibility of the individual against whom said judgment is renderedand/or his or her employer if that employer elects to make said payment. In furtherance of the above provision, (non-participatingjurisdiction) agrees to hold harmless, indemnify, and defend, with counsel reasonablyacceptable to the other parties and any named officers, the other parties to this Agreement andtheir officers, officials and employees from any loss, claim or liability arising from or out of anyalleged or actual negligent tortious actions or inactions of the VSWAT, its members andsupervisors, that might occur or allegedly occur while (non-participatingjurisdiction) receives the assistance of VSWAT within its jurisdiction. In the event that a claim or lawsuit is brought against a party or its employee(s) for actions arising out of their conduct in the operation of the VSWAT, such party shall promptly notify the other parties that said claim or lawsuit has been filed or commenced. The parties to this Agreement and their respective legal counsel shall, to the extentreasonably possible and consistent with the best interests of their respective clients, cooperatewith the defense of any lawsuit arising out of the operations of the VSWAT; provided thiscooperation does not require the parties to share any out of pocket litigation costs. Said costswill be the responsibility of (non-participating jurisdiction). Upon request by another party, each party shall disclose to the other parties the terms of their respective liability insurance policies to allow for coordination of coverage. The consent of any liability insurance carrier or self-insured pool or organization is not required to make this Agreement effective between the parties, and the failure of any insurance carrier or self-insured pooling organization to agree to follow the terms of this Agreement on liability allocation shall not relieve any party from its obligations under this agreement. 10. INTERLOCAL COOPERATION ACT PROVISIONS. No special budget or funds are anticipated, nor shall any be created. It is not intended that a separate legal entity be established to conduct this cooperative undertaking, nor is there any acquisition, holding, or 8f. ‐ Police Department recommends approval of interlocal agreements  with non‐participating jurisdictions for the provision of Valley Special  Page 202 of 325 VSWAT ILA for non participating agency Page 4 of 7 disposal of real or personal property other than as specifically provided within the terms of this Agreement. Upon execution hereof, this Agreement shall be filed with the city clerks of the respective participating municipalities, and such other governmental agencies as may be required by law. 11. AUTHORIZATION TO ENFORCE LAWS. While this agreement is entered pursuant to Chapter 39.34 RCW entitled, “Interlocal Cooperation Act,” this agreement shall, pursuant to RCW 10.93.070(1), also constitute the prior written consent of the sheriff or chief of police of each participating agency for the purposes of authorizing officers of VSWAT to enforce the laws of this state within their respective jurisdictions, and to that end, the sheriff or police chief of each participating agency consents to the full exercise of peace officer powers within his or her jurisdiction by any properly certificated or exempt officer engaged in VSWAT related activities. 12. DISPUTE RESOLUTION. For the purpose of this Agreement, time is of the essence. Should any dispute arise concerning the enforcement, breach or interpretation of this Agreement, the parties shall first meet in a good faith attempt to resolve the dispute. In the event the dispute is not resolved, it shall be resolved by binding arbitration pursuant to RCW 7.04A, as amended, and the Mandatory Rules of Arbitration (MAR); and venue shall be placed in King County, Washington and the laws of the State of Washington shall apply. 13. AUTHORIZATIONS. By signing below, the signor certifies that he or she has the authority to sign this Agreement on behalf of the party, and the party agrees to the terms of this Agreement. This Agreement shall be executed pursuant to an appropriate resolution or ordinance of the governing body of each jurisdiction, where necessary. 14. CONTRACT REPRESENTATIVES. Each party shall have a contract representative. Each party may change its representative upon providing written notice to the other party. The parties' representatives are as follows: Port of Seattle:Chief Colleen Wilson, or her successor City of Auburn:Chief Bob Lee, or his successor City of Federal Way:Chief Brian Wilson, or his successor City of Kent:Chief Ken Thomas, or his successor City of Renton:Chief Kevin Milosevich, or his successor City of Tukwila:Chief Mike Villa, or his successor Chief _______ or his/her successor (non-participating jurisdiction) 15. ENTIRE AGREEMENT. The parties agree that this Agreement is the complete expression of its terms and conditions. Any oral or written representations or understandings not incorporated in this Agreement are specifically excluded. 16. SEVERABILITY. If any part, paragraph, section or provision of this Agreement is held to be invalid by any court of competent jurisdiction, such adjudication shall not affect the 8f. ‐ Police Department recommends approval of interlocal agreements  with non‐participating jurisdictions for the provision of Valley Special  Page 203 of 325 VSWAT ILA for non participating agency Page 5 of 7 validity of any remaining section, part, or provision of this Agreement. 17. SIGNED COUNTERPARTS. This Agreement may be executed by counterparts and be valid as if each authorized representative had signed the original document. 18. EFFECTIVE DATE. This Agreement shall be deemed effective upon the last date of execution by the last authorized representative. PORT OF SEATTLE ____________________________________ Date: _______________________ Chief Colleen Wilson ____________________________________ Date: _______________________ Tay Yoshitani, Executive Director Attest: Approved as to Legal Form: ____________________________________ ____________________________ By:_________________________________ Paul Bintinger, Port Counsel CITY OF AUBURN _______________________________________ Date: _______________________ Bob Lee, Chief of Police ____________________________________ Date: _______________________ Peter B. Lewis, Mayor Attest: Approved as to Legal Form: ____________________________________ ____________________________ By:_________________________________ Steven L. Gross, Assistant City Attorney CITY OF FEDERAL WAY ____________________________________ Date: _______________________ Brian Wilson, Chief of Police ____________________________________ Date: _______________________ Skip Priest, Mayor Attest: Approved as to Form: 8f. ‐ Police Department recommends approval of interlocal agreements  with non‐participating jurisdictions for the provision of Valley Special  Page 204 of 325 VSWAT ILA for non participating agency Page 6 of 7 ____________________________________ ____________________________ By:_________________________________ Patricia Richardson, City Attorney CITY OF KENT _______________________________________ Date: _______________________ Ken Thomas, Chief of Police ____________________________________ Date: _______________________ Suzette Cooke, Mayor Attest: Approved as to Form: ____________________________________ ____________________________ By:_________________________________ Pat Fitzpatrick, Deputy City Attorney CITY OF RENTON ____________________________________ Date: _______________________ Chief Kevin Milosevich ____________________________________ Date: _______________________ Denis Law, Mayor Attest: Approved as to Form: ____________________________________ ____________________________ By: Bonnie Walton, City Clerk Zanetta L. Fontes, Sr. Ass’t City Attorney CITY OF TUKWILA _______________________________________ Date: _______________________ Mike Villa, Chief of Police ____________________________________ Date: _______________________ Jim Haggerton, Mayor Attest: Approved as to Form: ____________________________________ ____________________________ 8f. ‐ Police Department recommends approval of interlocal agreements  with non‐participating jurisdictions for the provision of Valley Special  Page 205 of 325 VSWAT ILA for non participating agency Page 7 of 7 By: ____________, City Clerk _____________, City Attorney CITY OF ______________ _______________________________________ Date: _______________________ ______________________, Chief of Police ____________________________________ Date: _______________________ _________________, Mayor/City Manager Attest: Approved as to Legal Form: ____________________________________ ____________________________ By:_________________________________ _____________, Counsel for ____________ 8f. ‐ Police Department recommends approval of interlocal agreements  with non‐participating jurisdictions for the provision of Valley Special  Page 206 of 325 8f. ‐ Police Department recommends approval of interlocal agreements  with non‐participating jurisdictions for the provision of Valley Special  Page 207 of 325 8f. ‐ Police Department recommends approval of interlocal agreements  with non‐participating jurisdictions for the provision of Valley Special  Page 208 of 325 8f. ‐ Police Department recommends approval of interlocal agreements  with non‐participating jurisdictions for the provision of Valley Special  Page 209 of 325 8f. ‐ Police Department recommends approval of interlocal agreements  with non‐participating jurisdictions for the provision of Valley Special  Page 210 of 325 8f. ‐ Police Department recommends approval of interlocal agreements  with non‐participating jurisdictions for the provision of Valley Special  Page 211 of 325 8f. ‐ Police Department recommends approval of interlocal agreements  with non‐participating jurisdictions for the provision of Valley Special  Page 212 of 325 8f. ‐ Police Department recommends approval of interlocal agreements  with non‐participating jurisdictions for the provision of Valley Special  Page 213 of 325 8f. ‐ Police Department recommends approval of interlocal agreements  with non‐participating jurisdictions for the provision of Valley Special  Page 214 of 325 8f. ‐ Police Department recommends approval of interlocal agreements  with non‐participating jurisdictions for the provision of Valley Special  Page 215 of 325 8f. ‐ Police Department recommends approval of interlocal agreements  with non‐participating jurisdictions for the provision of Valley Special  Page 216 of 325 8f. ‐ Police Department recommends approval of interlocal agreements  with non‐participating jurisdictions for the provision of Valley Special  Page 217 of 325 CITY OF RENTON COUNCIL AGENDA BILL Subject/Title: Memorandum of Understanding for Planning, Funding and Implementation of a Joint Funding Program Meeting: Regular Council - 10 Sep 2012 Exhibits: Issue Paper MOU between the Cities of Auburn, Kent, Renton, Tukwila, Algona, Pacific, Fife, Puyallup and Sumner Resolution Submitting Data: Dept/Div/Board: Police Staff Contact: Kevin Milosevich, x7503 Recommended Action: Council Concur Fiscal Impact: Expenditure Required: $ $30,000 - per year for two years Transfer Amendment: $ Amount Budgeted: $ 0 - to be funded out of the federal narcotic seizure fund Revenue Generated: $ Total Project Budget: $ City Share Total Project: $ SUMMARY OF ACTION: The purpose of the MOU is to formalize a cooperative arrangement between the Cities and a coalition of the mayors of the Cities colloquially known as the "Valley Cities Association" for the purpose of addressing shared community issues, including, but not limited to, gang prevention and intervention through the Alive & Free program. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Approve the MOU for Planning, Funding and Implementation of a Joint Funding Program and authorize the Mayor and City Clerk to sign the MOU. 8g. ‐ Police Department recommends approval of a Memorandum of  Understanding with the Valley Cities Association in the amount of  Page 218 of 325 8g. ‐ Police Department recommends approval of a Memorandum of  Understanding with the Valley Cities Association in the amount of  Page 219 of 325 POLICE DEPARTMENT M E M O R A N D U M DATE:August 20, 2012 TO:Rich Zwicker, Council President Members of Renton City Council VIA:Denis Law, Mayor FROM:Kevin Milosevich, Chief STAFF CONTACT:Kevin Milosevich SUBJECT:Memorandum of Understanding between the Cities of Auburn, Kent, Tukwila and Renton ISSUE Should the City of Renton enter into a memorandum of understanding with the cities of Auburn, Kent and Tukwila to establish an outreach program to reduce gang violence in our community? The cost of this program will be matched by Seahawks Coach Pete Carroll’s “A Better Seattle” Foundation. RECOMMENDATION Approve the recommendation of the Department to enter into the agreement with the YMCA of Greater Seattle to establish the Alive & Free Outreach Program. OVERVIEW The Alive & Free program serves as the “A Better Seattle” campaign’s official street outreach program. Alive & Free has a proven track record of reducing gang violence and advocates on behalf of young people directly involved in and impacted by gang violence. The Alive & Free Outreach Network connects high risk, gang influenced youth and young adults with positive support systems and provides Critical Incident Response management for major incidents of youth violence and major event safety planning in partnership with Seattle Youth Violence Prevention Initiative (SYVPI) to increase community safety. Alive & Free Outreach Workers advocate on behalf of young people directly involved in and impacted by gang violence and act as a bridge to services for those who are most in need of a community web of support. Outreach Workers reflect the young people they serve and have the training and skills to engage them in relevant, meaningful and positive opportunities that are proven to reduce risk factors for violence and gang involvement. Outreach Workers are trained in the Alive & Free Prescription™ and teach youth to eliminate risks from their lives and help them develop the self-knowledge, tools and skills to stay truly Alive & Free. 8g. ‐ Police Department recommends approval of a Memorandum of  Understanding with the Valley Cities Association in the amount of  Page 220 of 325 Page 2 of 2 August 20, 2012 The program will employ a total of four outreach workers in the participating cities. The City of Renton is financially responsible for $30,000 a year for a two year program. This pilot program will be funded through the federal narcotic seizure fund. Therefore, no additional funds are requested. The cities will develop a series of protocols and expectations for this two-year pilot program. CONCLUSION Staff recommends Council approve the proposed memorandum of understanding. 8g. ‐ Police Department recommends approval of a Memorandum of  Understanding with the Valley Cities Association in the amount of  Page 221 of 325 MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING BETWEEN THE CITIES OF AUBURN, KENT, RENTON, TUKWILA, ALGONA, PACIFIC, FIFE, PUYALLUP AND SUMNER FOR PLANNING, FUNDING, AND IMPLEMENTATION OF A JOINT FUNDING PROGRAM. THIS MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING (“MOU”) is entered into pursuant to Chapter 39.34 RCW by the Cities of Auburn, Kent, Renton, Tukwila, Algona, Pacific, Fife, Puyallup and Sumner, Washington hereinafter referred to as “Cities”, to provide for planning, funding, and implementation of a joint funding program. WHEREAS, the Cities engage in activities which support service providers in King County; and WHEREAS, the parties wish to make the most efficient use of their resources by cooperating to provide funding to support service providers in south King County; and WHEREAS, through the Interlocal Cooperation Act, the parties have the authority to engage in cooperative efforts which result in more efficient use of Government resources. NOW THEREFORE, and in consideration of the terms, conditions and performances made herein, it is agreed as follows: 1. Purpose of MOU: The purpose of the MOU is to formalize a cooperative arrangement between the Cities and a coalition of the mayors of the Cities colloquially known as the “Valley Cities Association” for the purpose of addressing shared community issues, including, but not limited to gang prevention and intervention. 2. Joint Participation. a)Lead City. One of the party Cities will serve as Lead City and will be designated by the Cities for contracting, with the Lead City determined as shown in Exhibit A, a copy of which is attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference, to act as the fiscal and administrative agent for the Cities. The responsibilities of the Lead City are described in Section 4. b)Participating City. A Participating City is a city participating in the cooperative funding, who is not the Lead City. Participating Cities are identified in Exhibit A. A Participating City shall review quarterly reports from the contracted agencies to provide services related to the shared community issues, such as gang prevention and intervention. If a Participating City becomes concerned with the Agency’s services, it will promptly notify the Lead City. If a Participating City determines that the Agency is not performing satisfactorily for their city, the Participating City reserves the right to request the Lead City to withhold payments to the Agency for their share of 8g. ‐ Police Department recommends approval of a Memorandum of  Understanding with the Valley Cities Association in the amount of  Page 222 of 325 Joint Funding MOU Page 2 of 7 funding. In the event that a claim or lawsuit is initiated by the Agency against any City for withholding payment, the City requesting the withholding of payment shall be responsible for settling or defending the claim or lawsuit. In addition, in the event of any settlement of or judgment on the claim or lawsuit, the City requesting that payment be withheld shall be fully responsible for the payment of such settlement of judgment and shall indemnify, defend, and hold harmless the other Cities for such settlement or lawsuit. 3. Funding Arrangement. a)Allocation. Each Participating City shall provide to the Lead City no later than March 31st of each year, the total annual funding allocation approved for the Agency, as described in Exhibit A. No administrative costs shall be imposed by the Lead City to the participating Cities. Exhibit A will be updated each year to show the contracted Agency(ies), Lead City, participating Cities, and funding amounts for that calendar year. b)Return of Unspent Funds. Any monies that the Agency(ies) does not spend during the calendar year shall be proportionately returned to each Participating City. On or before March 31st of the next calendar year the Lead City will provide the unspent funds to each participating City. 4. Responsibilities of Lead City. A Lead City has been designated to act as the fiscal and administrative agent on behalf of the Cities for the Agency, as shown in Exhibit A. The responsibilities of the Lead City shall include the following: a)Send an invoice to each Participating City by January 30th of each year for their annual approved allocation to the Agency. b)Contract with the Agency each year, for the total funding allocated by the Participating Cities, detailing performance measures to be performed by the Agency for each City. c)Receive, review, and process the quarterly invoices and reports from the Agency. Quarterly reports shall describe services provided specifically to each City. Disputes regarding billings will be resolved among the Participating Cities. d)Provide copies of quarterly reports to the Participating Cities, if the reports are not provided directly by the Agency. e)Provide the Agency with a funding application and technical assistance as required. f)Perform an annual monitoring visit of the Agency, to include the participation of another Participating City. g)Maintain accounts and records which properly reflect transactions related to this MOU. 5. Duration. This MOU shall become effective when it is approved by a majority of the Cities and shall remain in effect through December 31, 2012, with automatic extensions annually, unless terminated as described in section 6. 8g. ‐ Police Department recommends approval of a Memorandum of  Understanding with the Valley Cities Association in the amount of  Page 223 of 325 Joint Funding MOU Page 3 of 7 6. Termination. Any party may terminate its participation in the MOU without cause by giving the other Cities a thirty day written notice. The terminating party shall remain fully responsible for meeting its funding responsibilities and other obligations established by this MOU through the end of the calendar year in which such notice is given. 7. Notices. Notices to the Cities shall be sent to the following persons: City Contact Auburn Michael Hursh, Administration Kent Renton Tukwila Algona Pacific Fife Puyallup Sumner 8.Indemnification. Each City agrees to indemnify the other Cities from any claims, damages, losses, and costs, including, but not limited to, attorney’s fees and litigation costs, arising out of claims by third parties for property damage and bodily injury, including death, caused by the sole negligence or willful misconduct of such City, the City’s employees, affiliated corporations, officers, and lower tier subcontractors in connection with this MOU. Each City hereby waives its immunity under Title 51 of the Revised Code of Washington for claims of any type brought by any City agent or employee against the other Cities. This waiver is specifically negotiated by the parties and a portion of the City’s payment hereunder is expressly made the consideration for this waiver. 9.Insurance. Each City shall procure and maintain in full force throughout the duration of the Agreement comprehensive general liability insurance with a minimum coverage of $1,000,000.00 per occurrence/aggregate for personal injury and property damage. In the event that a City is a member of a pool of self-insured cities, the City shall provide proof of such membership in lieu of the insurance requirement above. Such 8g. ‐ Police Department recommends approval of a Memorandum of  Understanding with the Valley Cities Association in the amount of  Page 224 of 325 Joint Funding MOU Page 4 of 7 self insurance shall provide coverage equal to or greater that required of non-self insurance pool member Cities. 10.Oversight Committee. This Agreement shall be managed by an Oversight Committee made up of one representative of each City. The representative of each City shall be designated in section 7 of this Agreement. The Oversight Committee shall meet at least annually to discuss the terms of the Agreement and manage the services provided pursuant to the Agreement. 11.Applicable Law; Venue; Attorney's Fees. This Agreement shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of the State of Washington. In the event any suit, arbitration, or other proceeding is instituted to enforce any term of this Agreement, the parties specifically understand and agree that venue shall be exclusively in King County, Washington. The prevailing party in any such action shall be entitled to its attorney's fees and costs of suit. 12.Signed Counterparts. This Agreement may be executed by counterparts and be valid as if each authorized representative had signed the original document. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned have entered into this MOU as of this ____________ day of ______________________, 2012 CITY OF AUBURN By: ___________________________ Title:___________________________ Date: __________________________ Attest:__________________________ Approved As To Form: ______________________________ City Attorney CITY OF KENT By: ___________________________ Title:___________________________ Date: __________________________ Attest:__________________________ Approved As To Form: ______________________________ City Attorney 8g. ‐ Police Department recommends approval of a Memorandum of  Understanding with the Valley Cities Association in the amount of  Page 225 of 325 Joint Funding MOU Page 5 of 7 CITY OF RENTON By: ___________________________ Title:___________________________ Date: __________________________ Attest:__________________________ Approved As To Form: ______________________________ City Attorney CITY OF TUKWILA By: ___________________________ Title:___________________________ Date: __________________________ Attest:__________________________ Approved As To Form: ______________________________ City Attorney CITY OF ALGONA By: ___________________________ Title:___________________________ Date: __________________________ Attest:__________________________ Approved As To Form: ______________________________ City Attorney CITY OF PACIFIC By: ___________________________ Title:___________________________ Date: __________________________ Attest:__________________________ Approved As To Form: ______________________________ City Attorney 8g. ‐ Police Department recommends approval of a Memorandum of  Understanding with the Valley Cities Association in the amount of  Page 226 of 325 Joint Funding MOU Page 6 of 7 CITY OF FIFE By: ___________________________ Title:___________________________ Date: __________________________ Attest:__________________________ Approved As To Form: ______________________________ City Attorney CITY OF PUYALLUP By: ___________________________ Title:___________________________ Date: __________________________ Attest:__________________________ Approved As To Form: ______________________________ City Attorney CITY OF SUMNER By: ___________________________ Title:___________________________ Date: __________________________ Attest:__________________________ Approved As To Form: ______________________________ City Attorney 8g. ‐ Police Department recommends approval of a Memorandum of  Understanding with the Valley Cities Association in the amount of  Page 227 of 325 Joint Funding MOU Page 7 of 7 EXHIBIT A to Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) between the Valley Cities Association for planning, funding, and implementation of joint funding program. CALENDAR YEAR 2012 Name of Agency Participating Cities & Tentative Funding YMCA of Greater Seattle – Alive & Free Program Auburn - Lead City - $30,000 Kent - $30,000 Renton - $30,000 Tukwila - $30,000 TOTAL - $ 120,000 8g. ‐ Police Department recommends approval of a Memorandum of  Understanding with the Valley Cities Association in the amount of  Page 228 of 325 8g. ‐ Police Department recommends approval of a Memorandum of  Understanding with the Valley Cities Association in the amount of  Page 229 of 325 8g. ‐ Police Department recommends approval of a Memorandum of  Understanding with the Valley Cities Association in the amount of  Page 230 of 325 CITY OF RENTON COUNCIL AGENDA BILL Subject/Title: Residential Plat Stormwater Management Facility Maintenance Program – Authorizing Mayor or Mayor’s Designee to Sign Deeds, Easements, and/or Other Conveyance Documents Meeting: Regular Council - 10 Sep 2012 Exhibits: RMC 4-6-030.k Submitting Data: Dept/Div/Board: Public Works Staff Contact: Ron Straka, x7248 Recommended Action: Council Concur Fiscal Impact: Expenditure Required: $ N/A Transfer Amendment: $N/A Amount Budgeted: $ N/A Revenue Generated: $N/A Total Project Budget: $ N/A City Share Total Project: $ N/A SUMMARY OF ACTION: On October 18, 2010 Council approved a new program to assume maintenance and operation of all stormwater facilities in residential plats that manage runoff from public streets. The program budget to fund the resources required for the City to assume maintenance of these stormwater facilities was approved by City Council on November 14, 2011, with the 2012 budget adjustment. As this program is implemented there is a need to sign and record deeds, dedication easements and/or other conveyance documents for the City to assume maintenance of 213 stormwater facilities. Rather than bring conveyance and recording documents for each of these facilities to Council to authorize their signature, staff recommends Council authorize the Mayor or the Mayor’s designee to sign the facility conveyance documents, as authorized by RMC 4-6-030.k. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Authorize the Mayor or the Mayor’s designee to sign deeds, dedication easements, and/or other conveyance documents required for City assumption of maintenance of stormwater facilities in plats that manage runoff from public streets. 8h. ‐ Utility Systems Division recommends authorizing the Mayor or  Mayor's Designee to sign deeds, easements, and other conveyance Page 231 of 325 4-6-030 DRAINAGE (SURFACE WATER) STANDARDS: K. MAINTENANCE OF DRAINAGE FACILITIES: 1. Drainage Facilities Accepted by the City of Renton for Maintenance: a. The City of Renton is responsible for maintenance, including performance and operation of drainage facilities that have formally been accepted by the Administrator. b. The City of Renton may assume maintenance of privately maintained drainage facilities after the expiration of the two (2) year maintenance period in connection with the subdivision of land if the following conditions have been met: i. All of the requirements of subsection E of this Section have been fully complied with; ii. The facilities have been inspected and any defects or repairs have been corrected and approved by the Department prior to the end of the two (2) year maintenance period; iii. All necessary easements entitling the City to properly maintain the facility have been conveyed to the City; iv. The facility is constructed on a plat with public streets and located on tracts or easements dedicated to the City; and v. It is recommended by the Administrator and concurred in by the City Council that said assumption of maintenance would be in the best interests of the City. c. A drainage facility which does not meet the criteria of this subsection shall remain the responsibility of the applicant required to construct the facility and persons holding title to the property for which the facility was required. 8h. ‐ Utility Systems Division recommends authorizing the Mayor or  Mayor's Designee to sign deeds, easements, and other conveyance Page 232 of 325 10a. ‐ Non‐participating jurisdiction Valley Special Weapons and Tactics  (VSWAT) Team interlocal agreements  (See 8.f.) Page 233 of 325 10a. ‐ Non‐participating jurisdiction Valley Special Weapons and Tactics  (VSWAT) Team interlocal agreements  (See 8.f.) Page 234 of 325 10a. ‐ Non‐participating jurisdiction Valley Special Weapons and Tactics  (VSWAT) Team interlocal agreements  (See 8.f.) Page 235 of 325 10a. ‐ Non‐participating jurisdiction Valley Special Weapons and Tactics  (VSWAT) Team interlocal agreements  (See 8.f.) Page 236 of 325 10a. ‐ Non‐participating jurisdiction Valley Special Weapons and Tactics  (VSWAT) Team interlocal agreements  (See 8.f.) Page 237 of 325 10a. ‐ Non‐participating jurisdiction Valley Special Weapons and Tactics  (VSWAT) Team interlocal agreements  (See 8.f.) Page 238 of 325 10a. ‐ Non‐participating jurisdiction Valley Special Weapons and Tactics  (VSWAT) Team interlocal agreements  (See 8.f.) Page 239 of 325 10a. ‐ Non‐participating jurisdiction Valley Special Weapons and Tactics  (VSWAT) Team interlocal agreements  (See 8.f.) Page 240 of 325 10a. ‐ Non‐participating jurisdiction Valley Special Weapons and Tactics  (VSWAT) Team interlocal agreements  (See 8.f.) Page 241 of 325 10a. ‐ Non‐participating jurisdiction Valley Special Weapons and Tactics  (VSWAT) Team interlocal agreements  (See 8.f.) Page 242 of 325 10a. ‐ Non‐participating jurisdiction Valley Special Weapons and Tactics  (VSWAT) Team interlocal agreements  (See 8.f.) Page 243 of 325 10b. ‐ Memorandum of Understanding with Valley Cities Association  regarding a joint funding program  (See 8.g.) Page 244 of 325 10b. ‐ Memorandum of Understanding with Valley Cities Association  regarding a joint funding program  (See 8.g.) Page 245 of 325 10c. ‐ Emergency preparedness container interlocal agreement with  Seattle‐King County Public Health  (See 9.c.) Page 246 of 325 10c. ‐ Emergency preparedness container interlocal agreement with  Seattle‐King County Public Health  (See 9.c.) Page 247 of 325 10d. ‐ Updating the Six‐Year Transportation Improvement Program 2013‐ 2018  (See 9.d.) Page 248 of 325 10d. ‐ Updating the Six‐Year Transportation Improvement Program 2013‐ 2018  (See 9.d.) Page 249 of 325 10d. ‐ Updating the Six‐Year Transportation Improvement Program 2013‐ 2018  (See 9.d.) Page 250 of 325 10d. ‐ Updating the Six‐Year Transportation Improvement Program 2013‐ 2018  (See 9.d.) Page 251 of 325 10d. ‐ Updating the Six‐Year Transportation Improvement Program 2013‐ 2018  (See 9.d.) Page 252 of 325 10d. ‐ Updating the Six‐Year Transportation Improvement Program 2013‐ 2018  (See 9.d.) Page 253 of 325 10d. ‐ Updating the Six‐Year Transportation Improvement Program 2013‐ 2018  (See 9.d.) Page 254 of 325 10d. ‐ Updating the Six‐Year Transportation Improvement Program 2013‐ 2018  (See 9.d.) Page 255 of 325 10d. ‐ Updating the Six‐Year Transportation Improvement Program 2013‐ 2018  (See 9.d.) Page 256 of 325 10d. ‐ Updating the Six‐Year Transportation Improvement Program 2013‐ 2018  (See 9.d.) Page 257 of 325 10d. ‐ Updating the Six‐Year Transportation Improvement Program 2013‐ 2018  (See 9.d.) Page 258 of 325 10d. ‐ Updating the Six‐Year Transportation Improvement Program 2013‐ 2018  (See 9.d.) Page 259 of 325 10d. ‐ Updating the Six‐Year Transportation Improvement Program 2013‐ 2018  (See 9.d.) Page 260 of 325 10d. ‐ Updating the Six‐Year Transportation Improvement Program 2013‐ 2018  (See 9.d.) Page 261 of 325 10d. ‐ Updating the Six‐Year Transportation Improvement Program 2013‐ 2018  (See 9.d.) Page 262 of 325 10d. ‐ Updating the Six‐Year Transportation Improvement Program 2013‐ 2018  (See 9.d.) Page 263 of 325 10d. ‐ Updating the Six‐Year Transportation Improvement Program 2013‐ 2018  (See 9.d.) Page 264 of 325 10d. ‐ Updating the Six‐Year Transportation Improvement Program 2013‐ 2018  (See 9.d.) Page 265 of 325 10d. ‐ Updating the Six‐Year Transportation Improvement Program 2013‐ 2018  (See 9.d.) Page 266 of 325 10d. ‐ Updating the Six‐Year Transportation Improvement Program 2013‐ 2018  (See 9.d.) Page 267 of 325 10d. ‐ Updating the Six‐Year Transportation Improvement Program 2013‐ 2018  (See 9.d.) Page 268 of 325 10d. ‐ Updating the Six‐Year Transportation Improvement Program 2013‐ 2018  (See 9.d.) Page 269 of 325 10d. ‐ Updating the Six‐Year Transportation Improvement Program 2013‐ 2018  (See 9.d.) Page 270 of 325 10d. ‐ Updating the Six‐Year Transportation Improvement Program 2013‐ 2018  (See 9.d.) Page 271 of 325 10d. ‐ Updating the Six‐Year Transportation Improvement Program 2013‐ 2018  (See 9.d.) Page 272 of 325 10d. ‐ Updating the Six‐Year Transportation Improvement Program 2013‐ 2018  (See 9.d.) Page 273 of 325 10d. ‐ Updating the Six‐Year Transportation Improvement Program 2013‐ 2018  (See 9.d.) Page 274 of 325 10d. ‐ Updating the Six‐Year Transportation Improvement Program 2013‐ 2018  (See 9.d.) Page 275 of 325 10d. ‐ Updating the Six‐Year Transportation Improvement Program 2013‐ 2018  (See 9.d.) Page 276 of 325 10d. ‐ Updating the Six‐Year Transportation Improvement Program 2013‐ 2018  (See 9.d.) Page 277 of 325 10d. ‐ Updating the Six‐Year Transportation Improvement Program 2013‐ 2018  (See 9.d.) Page 278 of 325 10d. ‐ Updating the Six‐Year Transportation Improvement Program 2013‐ 2018  (See 9.d.) Page 279 of 325 10d. ‐ Updating the Six‐Year Transportation Improvement Program 2013‐ 2018  (See 9.d.) Page 280 of 325 10d. ‐ Updating the Six‐Year Transportation Improvement Program 2013‐ 2018  (See 9.d.) Page 281 of 325 10d. ‐ Updating the Six‐Year Transportation Improvement Program 2013‐ 2018  (See 9.d.) Page 282 of 325 10d. ‐ Updating the Six‐Year Transportation Improvement Program 2013‐ 2018  (See 9.d.) Page 283 of 325 10d. ‐ Updating the Six‐Year Transportation Improvement Program 2013‐ 2018  (See 9.d.) Page 284 of 325 10d. ‐ Updating the Six‐Year Transportation Improvement Program 2013‐ 2018  (See 9.d.) Page 285 of 325 10d. ‐ Updating the Six‐Year Transportation Improvement Program 2013‐ 2018  (See 9.d.) Page 286 of 325 10d. ‐ Updating the Six‐Year Transportation Improvement Program 2013‐ 2018  (See 9.d.) Page 287 of 325 10d. ‐ Updating the Six‐Year Transportation Improvement Program 2013‐ 2018  (See 9.d.) Page 288 of 325 10d. ‐ Updating the Six‐Year Transportation Improvement Program 2013‐ 2018  (See 9.d.) Page 289 of 325 10d. ‐ Updating the Six‐Year Transportation Improvement Program 2013‐ 2018  (See 9.d.) Page 290 of 325 10d. ‐ Updating the Six‐Year Transportation Improvement Program 2013‐ 2018  (See 9.d.) Page 291 of 325 10d. ‐ Updating the Six‐Year Transportation Improvement Program 2013‐ 2018  (See 9.d.) Page 292 of 325 10d. ‐ Updating the Six‐Year Transportation Improvement Program 2013‐ 2018  (See 9.d.) Page 293 of 325 10d. ‐ Updating the Six‐Year Transportation Improvement Program 2013‐ 2018  (See 9.d.) Page 294 of 325 10d. ‐ Updating the Six‐Year Transportation Improvement Program 2013‐ 2018  (See 9.d.) Page 295 of 325 10d. ‐ Updating the Six‐Year Transportation Improvement Program 2013‐ 2018  (See 9.d.) Page 296 of 325 10d. ‐ Updating the Six‐Year Transportation Improvement Program 2013‐ 2018  (See 9.d.) Page 297 of 325 10d. ‐ Updating the Six‐Year Transportation Improvement Program 2013‐ 2018  (See 9.d.) Page 298 of 325 10d. ‐ Updating the Six‐Year Transportation Improvement Program 2013‐ 2018  (See 9.d.) Page 299 of 325 10d. ‐ Updating the Six‐Year Transportation Improvement Program 2013‐ 2018  (See 9.d.) Page 300 of 325 10d. ‐ Updating the Six‐Year Transportation Improvement Program 2013‐ 2018  (See 9.d.) Page 301 of 325 10d. ‐ Updating the Six‐Year Transportation Improvement Program 2013‐ 2018  (See 9.d.) Page 302 of 325 10d. ‐ Updating the Six‐Year Transportation Improvement Program 2013‐ 2018  (See 9.d.) Page 303 of 325 10d. ‐ Updating the Six‐Year Transportation Improvement Program 2013‐ 2018  (See 9.d.) Page 304 of 325 10d. ‐ Updating the Six‐Year Transportation Improvement Program 2013‐ 2018  (See 9.d.) Page 305 of 325 10d. ‐ Updating the Six‐Year Transportation Improvement Program 2013‐ 2018  (See 9.d.) Page 306 of 325 10d. ‐ Updating the Six‐Year Transportation Improvement Program 2013‐ 2018  (See 9.d.) Page 307 of 325 10d. ‐ Updating the Six‐Year Transportation Improvement Program 2013‐ 2018  (See 9.d.) Page 308 of 325 10d. ‐ Updating the Six‐Year Transportation Improvement Program 2013‐ 2018  (See 9.d.) Page 309 of 325 10d. ‐ Updating the Six‐Year Transportation Improvement Program 2013‐ 2018  (See 9.d.) Page 310 of 325 10d. ‐ Updating the Six‐Year Transportation Improvement Program 2013‐ 2018  (See 9.d.) Page 311 of 325 10d. ‐ Updating the Six‐Year Transportation Improvement Program 2013‐ 2018  (See 9.d.) Page 312 of 325 10d. ‐ Updating the Six‐Year Transportation Improvement Program 2013‐ 2018  (See 9.d.) Page 313 of 325 10d. ‐ Updating the Six‐Year Transportation Improvement Program 2013‐ 2018  (See 9.d.) Page 314 of 325 10d. ‐ Updating the Six‐Year Transportation Improvement Program 2013‐ 2018  (See 9.d.) Page 315 of 325 10d. ‐ Updating the Six‐Year Transportation Improvement Program 2013‐ 2018  (See 9.d.) Page 316 of 325 10d. ‐ Updating the Six‐Year Transportation Improvement Program 2013‐ 2018  (See 9.d.) Page 317 of 325 10d. ‐ Updating the Six‐Year Transportation Improvement Program 2013‐ 2018  (See 9.d.) Page 318 of 325 10d. ‐ Updating the Six‐Year Transportation Improvement Program 2013‐ 2018  (See 9.d.) Page 319 of 325 10d. ‐ Updating the Six‐Year Transportation Improvement Program 2013‐ 2018  (See 9.d.) Page 320 of 325 10d. ‐ Updating the Six‐Year Transportation Improvement Program 2013‐ 2018  (See 9.d.) Page 321 of 325 10d. ‐ Updating the Six‐Year Transportation Improvement Program 2013‐ 2018  (See 9.d.) Page 322 of 325 10d. ‐ Updating the Six‐Year Transportation Improvement Program 2013‐ 2018  (See 9.d.) Page 323 of 325 10d. ‐ Updating the Six‐Year Transportation Improvement Program 2013‐ 2018  (See 9.d.) Page 324 of 325 10d. ‐ Updating the Six‐Year Transportation Improvement Program 2013‐ 2018  (See 9.d.) Page 325 of 325