HomeMy WebLinkAbout03386 - Technical Information Report R
•
V
� Duvall 8 Short Plat
� LUA-06-031
8 Lot Short Plat
NE 10th Street and Duvall Avenue NE
KC Tax Account #102305-9005
Technical Information Report
Februaty 10, 2009 �
Revised March 8, 2009 RE(;������
Revised April 8, 2009 QPR 2.
� 2009
p��F�EVIEyy '
Prepared for '
Seattle Savings Bank
Attn: Bruce Groom
190 Queen Anne Avenue North
Suite 100
Seattle, WA 98019 '
�y�-�'' L. p
O� \�IAS�r ,
r
�' � �'
y .
Submitted by ��'� �`��' �
�� ' �
Offe Engineers, PLLC 1 2;��' ;� ww�
Attn: Darrell Offe, P.E. �s�ONAL E����
13932 SE 159�' Place sf � u
Renton, WA 98058
�XPIRES
.' ___.__�- ---- -.-.
338�
Project Description
The purpose of this report is to present a preliminary drainage and downstream review
for the proposed Nguyen Property Short Plat project in accordance with the City of
Renton requirements. The project is located at the northwest comer of NE 10�' Street
and Duvall Avenue NE within the City iimits of Renton.
The Nguyen Property Short Plat is a proposal to create 8 singie-family lots from an
existing 1.11-acre parcel. The project is currently tax parcels number 102305-9Q05.
There are no exisdng houses on the property.
The parcel is bounded to the west by a proposed short plat called"Voung Short PIaY'
currently on file at the C'ity of Renton, to the south and east are NE 10th Street and
Dwall Avenue NE, respectfully. The property bo the north is undeveloped large lots with
older homes and open fields.
Review of Resouroes
Critical Drainage Area Map-tl�e property is divided into two separats
drainage basins
• Maplewood Creek/ Cedar River/ Lake Washington Watershed
• Honey Geek/ May Creek/ Lake Washington Watershed
Flood plain/floodway(FEMA) Maps
• There is no mapped floodplain in the immediate area per the available FEMA
map. '
Sensitive Areas
• Wetlands-There are no wetlands located on the property.
• Str�ams and 100 Year Flood Plains-There are no apparent streams or
floodplains that go through or abut the property. 'I
• Erosion Hazard Areas-There are no landslide hazard areas for the properly.
• Landslide Hazard Areas-There are designated sensitive slopes on and
adjoining the property.
• Seismic Hazard Areas-The area is not mapped as a seismic hazard area.
i
• Coal Mine Hazard Areas-The property does not appear to be located within
a designed coalmine hazard area.
- 2 -
I:\BACK UP�2008 Deoemb�HP PAVIUON(C)\Offe Engineers\1 PROJECi5ulndy C�ir�es\��8�Nguyen
Property\Coorespondenoe\Level One\lIR\sborm report.doc
.
U.S. Departrnent of Agricuiture, King County Soils Survey
• The soils have been classified by Comerstone Geotechnical as Glaaal Tilis; a
copy of the Geotechnical Report is attached as Appendix C.
Row Control Application
• The site is designated by the Caty of Renton as a Level Two detention standard.
Water Quality Application
• The project would provide Basic Water Quality control standards per the 2005
KCSWM Manual.
Feld Inspection
Offe Engineers has visited the site on several occasions. The most resent visit occurred
the morning of January 31, 2006. The property is currently an open field with a shed
located on the easteriy side. On the west, a gravel road exists along the proposed
alignment of Chelan Avenue NE. The property is bound on the south and east by
existing roads; NE 10"' Street and Duvalf Avenue NE. Open ditches currently convey the
drainage along these roads. The property curreniiy discharges via sheet flow to the
ditch along the west side of Dwall Avenue and sheet flows to the west on to the gravel
road then into NE 10�' Street. There do not appear to be any drainage problems on the
site or within the e�6sting open ditches. There is a downstr�eam open pond
approximately 150 feet west of the site. In earlier discussions with the Gty of Renton
Staff, this pond was built by the City to mitigate previous downstream drainage issues.
Review of the 8 Core Requirements and 5 �al Requir+ements of the 2005
King County Surfaae Watier Design Manual
OfFe Engineers has reviewed the Core and Specaal Requirements in Chapter 1 of the '
King County Surface Water Design Manual, and addresses each of the requirements as
follows:
Cor+e Re,quirement Na 1 —Disrhar,ge at Natvra/La��an
The project will discharge via sheet flow into the existing open channel along Dwall
Avenue NE and into the road conveyance system within NE 10"' Street.
Cor�e Repui�ment No. 2—Of�ihe Ana/ysis
Easberfy side -The property drains into an open ditch that flows both north and south
along Dwall Avenue. The ditches do not show any signs of overtopping or capacity
problems.
Wesberly side—The NE 10"' conveyance system is 12 feet deep at the SW comer of
the property. The system flows to the west an into the Gty open pond. Further review
of this system will be necessary during construction documents to verify capacity or
availability within the downstream pond.
- 3 -
I:�BAQC UP�2008 Decernber�HP_PAVILION(C�\Offe Engineers\i PROJECTS�Andy Carines\Dwall 8\Nguyen
�rtY\�\Level One\TIR�Stonn repoitdoc
I
s
Core Requir+ement No. 3—F/ow Conbv/
The proposed project will be required to provide control of the proposed houses and
driveways. Level two detention controls are required by the City of Renton.
Core Requirement No. 4—Conveyanc�e Sysl�em
Conveyance systems of catch basins and pipe are proposed along the frontages of
Duvall Ave., NE 10"' Street, and the proposed Chelan Ave. NE. This system will be sized
to meet the 2005 KCSWM design standards.
Core Re+quirement No, 5—Erosion and Sediment Contro/
A Temporary Erosion and Sediment Control Plan implementing the Best Management
Practices will be designed as part of the final engineering plans for the project in
accordance with �ty of Renton requirements.
Core Requirement No, 6—Maint�enanae and Operabons
The Maintenance and Operations Manual for the Nguyen Property Short Plat will be
included in the Fnal Technical Information Report(TIR) as part of the final engineering
design for the project.
Core Re+quirement No. 7—Finanoa/Gaarant�e�es and Liabi/iiy
The Fnancial Guarantees and Liabilities will be required prior to the project being
finalized by the City of Renton.
Core Re puirement No. 8— Wa�e�Qua/ity
The proposed project will provide storm water quality treatment within the proposed
vault meeting the 2005 KCSWM standards.
Sp�eda/Re+quir+ement No. 1—Adopt�d Ar�a Sp�eaific Repuirements
The project is located within the Cedar River Basin Plan and May Creek Basin Plan.
Spersa/Repuirement No. Z—F/o�adp/ain/F/oadway D�e/ineation
This requirement does not apply.
Sp�e�cia/Requirement No. 3—F/oad Pint�e�dion Faoi/ities
This requirement does not apply.
Spe�aia/Reiquirement No. 4—Sourrae Conb�v/s
This requirement does not apply.
Specia/Requirement No, 5—Oi/Contro/
This requirement does not apply.
- 4 -
I:\BAQC UP�2008 Deoernber�HP_PAVILION(C�\Offe Ergineers\1 PROJECT'S�Ardy Carines\Dwall 8\Nguyen
Property\Coorespondence\Level One\TIR\storm report.doc
Appendix A
Figures
1. Vicinity Map
2. Existing Site Topography
3. Proposed Site plan
'i
il
i
- 5 -
I:\BACK UP�2008 December�HP_PAVILION(C)\Offe Engineers\1 PROJECTS�Mdy Carir�es\Dwall 8\Nguyen
Property\Coorespondence�Level One\TIR\storm report.doc
1
• �
• I
VICINITY MAP
.�
�
�
y�pY
�
sE g5TM � MAr
� vn�y
��
i ��� �
s�
�
9
�
O+o /'`
� ��
W
2
W
� �
Q
�� BIVp � � �
�� , sE RENrpN _
�J �
NE �2n� sT o
W I�
2
� P ROJ ECT
a NE ,oTM 5T LO CATI 0 N
W
Z z
� �
� �
� Q < �
NE � �
�� j � ST O ; �
A
J j � �
W
S
NE eni T �
a
�
NE 4n� sr se izan� sr
N I//C/N/rY MAP I
SCALE.� NTS
�
_ �
. i
�„ � . �. i.,
� � '� ��-
� � � , ,..
-, ,
, �,.
�,,, •t �,,. 4.2 ,
� r
a 4,�
I i 0 �,^��o � �. � I
I � — - ----•—�.� ` �� y �d u ,s �u e ��a.
I I ,, ,�,, i s ,.•—' ,
� ' , �� �, ,
I. �.
' �� � � �� � , �
. . � � ���� 57Jf:29'3h t 2fJ8._�,.� i �/� \ � � �
� i' � •_4' tl^.440EU l"ilf2'c FEf'Cr . ���:*,�
� i �
i i � � i
� / ;%� � �� ��
l � I
' /
I � �..-.-� r, � �/' ��.,: ,r-��
I � /� �' ,'�+ ��.,_�-'"�
� / ��,
i f /° SI1Ep � �yf ��;
i
� I �� ,,-' ,,�'�/y / r�.__,,...._..�'-_ ,. � z
i i� � `i =�7 ,/` � �
� �, / j ',
� � �
� � i! ., �� � r�'`-�-���\\ z
i �;��� \ , w �;��
�� �� ��'�' � \\\ �l �� > i
y `..
' � � .��,:' �) s. .. .'� Q � -��:
���D � I� �i � i
J
;� � .� �-�,,.�.,� K� ' J � �: ,
; � �� ��� I� i � ��i
� � � Wir.a-:�a.3'+�.i: � y �
� I il �r:�.s»,�,�",
� ''
�,:,
... ,
—
,
1 �� .
.
� � I � � , , ----- � ��� "i
--/ /�% � �.._ .���� ' ' ` �� ��_�_
�, , �
, ,
.,.._., � , ,, , �
- l '�"'�'� __ _ ,� . 9
....�.��'� � ^� --
``t,
_....
I "
_ _.`L. _.. � — — — • — —•— —• --- —• -- I
-- , _ .,
_ �...—
� N.E. 1 OTH STREET � — - ' "
�,- ...�-
>, t� � , ;�,,, '
, ,. �
:IJG3 \yy��ir���u} �.. �� 'a ...�'. � 4 ?✓/ .;^ .. . I .
��/ :�x .��; �� �..:._��.�.., ,..��
l W l _
/p� � t§ d.� .� � f` � 4M � '�.�.-.J r Jp '' -
�)l����,({ �tr � `✓ y'1. '�n r � �staw'�R �_..,�.I�A�+_.pyy-.."�� .::� � .
�J`.�1�i) �'� Ew.a��SS �,e. � �.A � ,i�
bs.... �
'�!C u�QQ 1�,..iW.l U ` .�
� �� '�����, i�,'��
� � i
t.� �$�.y
, ��I.; ra_4T�71 A ��. 1
�
.���� 1 I
i
� S 88'29'34" E 286.26'
, 74.00' 90.00 20.00' 95.25'
Z�� �4� 7� C �O� � � fV N J N 42,
I '�' 'Sp0 SQ, F� a oo, �„0 SQ fEEt o
g � a o ar, �i � 4�62 � I
�0 Et cn
� � � 6 Z$$ sa• F� � so.00� ss.�s' o
�
_ � o Q
0
� N
z I r o � SQ F�� o ¢ � �-�� 2 FE� �o � � I
W 74.00' � 4,5�� � V �i 4�g6 Sn' �i � �
I
�� 3 � 90.00' � 95.13' w
Q �n I a � � ►
d- ��.� � o z
g o n � sa• F�� � N 'v a
W � � 6'�� � o � J
c=� � I �M OS 6 ; ��� 1 f�� � a
.
I z , � � 30 sp� � o � 6.��� Sn M' � I
�o ------_ _____��________s ��, � GRAPHICSCALE
�g�'� 0 1 S 30 80
� 49.88' 20.00' 59.11' 42'
� 1 /nch = 30 f�N
N 88'29'34" W 286.05'
� o
s _ _ NORTHEAST 10TH STREET �
— — — — — _ J
Appendix B
Detention Calcuiations (Levei 2)
�
Duvall 8 Short Plat
LUA-06-031
REVISED 4-8-2009
Tota/Site
Area
48,350 sq, fi: DEVELOPED
1,11 Acres
Pre-Deve%pe�d
Condition
Impervious
0 sq. ft.
PerVious
48,350 sq. ft. (Forest - Till)
1.11 Acres
Deve%p�+d
Condition
Impervious
31,428 sq. ft. (48,350 * 65% coverage)
2,730 sq. ft. (public-road) NE lOth Street **
0.78 Acres STA 4+75 - 3+45 1/2 street plus sidewalk (21';
Pen�ious
16,922 sq. ft. (48,350-31,428)
0,39 Acres
1.17 Acr�es Tota/Area Deve%p�ed
** - frontage improvements (otheerthan those accounted for) along Duvall Ave NE, NE lOth Street,
and Chelan Avenue NE require saw-cut and removal of existing paved shoulder with replacement
of new curb, gutter and sidewalk
r -
PRE-DEVELOPED CONDITIONS
2 , x
Area J
Till Forest 1.11 acres
Till Pasture 0.00 acres
Till Grass 0.00 acres
Ouiwash Forest 0.00 acres
Ouiwash Pasture 0.00 acres
Outwash Grass 0.00 acres
Wetland 0.0� acres
Impervious 0.00 acres
Total
1.11 acres
Scale Factar: 1.OU Hourly Reduced
Time Series: Pre-developed� ?>
Compute Time Series I
Modify User Input I
File for computed Time Series [.TSFJ
Flow Frequency Analysis
Time Series File:pre-developed.tsf
Project Locafion:Sea-Tac
---Annual Peak Flow Rates--- -----Flow Frequency Analysis-------
Flow Rate Rank Time of Peak - - Peaks - - Rank Return Prob
(CFS) (CFS) Period
0.078 2 2/09/O1 18:00 0.134 1 100.00 0.990
0.029 7 1/05/0216:00 0.078 2 25.00 0.960
0.071 3 2/28/03 3:00 0.071 3 10.00 0.900
0.008 8 3/24/04 19:00 0.067 4 5.00 0.800
0.040 6 1/OS/05 8:00 0.064 5 3.00 0.667
0.067 4 1/18/06 16:00 0.040 6 2.00 0.50a
0.064 5 11/24/06 4:00 0.029 7 1.30 0.231
0.134 1 1/09/08 6:00 0.008 8 1.10 0.091
Computed Peaks 0.116 50.00 0.980
Flow Frequency Analysis
Time Series File:pre-dev='- ,�•� �-�
Project Location:Sea-Ta.
Developed Site Conditions
' � -
� � �
Area ?
Till Farest 0.00 acres
Till Pasture 0.00 acres
Till Grass 0.39 acres
Ouiwash Forest a•a� acres �
Outwash Pasture 0.00 acres
Ouiwash Grass O.OU acres
4+Yetland �.00 acres
Imper►rious 0.78 acres
Tatal
1.17 acres
Scale Factor : 1.00 Hourly Reduced
Time Series: Dev.tsf >?�
Compute Time Series
____ __ __ _ __ _ __ _ __-�
Modiiy User Input i
File for computed Time Series [.TSFj
F1ow Frequency Analysis
Time Series File:dev.tsf
Project Location:Sea-Tac
---Annual Peak Flow Rates--- -----Flow Frequency Analysis-------
Flow Rate Rank Time of Peak - - Peaks - - Rank Return Prob
fCFS) (CFS) Period
0.224 6 2/09/O1 2:00 0.451 1 100.00 0.990
G.185 8 1/OS/02 16:00 0.293 2 25.00 0.960
G.2o9 3 2/27/03 7:00 0.269 3 10.00 0.900
0.202 7 8/26/09 2:00 0.242 4 5.00 0.800
0.242 4 10/28/09 16:00 0.238 5 3.00 0.667
0.238 5 1/18/06 16:00 0.224 6 2.00 0.500
0.293 2 10/26/06 0:00 0.202 7 1.30 0.231
0.451 1 1/09/OB 6:00 0.185 8 1.10 0.091
Ccmputed Peaks 0.398 50.00 0.980
Interval Sizing:
2 Year Peak Flow = 0.04 cfs
First Interval(50%of 2 Year) = 0.02 cfs
Interval Size (50 Year-50%of 2 Year) = 0.116-0.02 = 0.096 cfs
? � 1 � 1 . X
Time Series File is pre-de�eloped.tsf ?J
Output File is Target.dur
Type of Intervals
�` Stage � Discharge
Number of Intenrals 36
Interval Size 0.096�
First Interval .02
User Specified intervals ,
Compute Flow Durations I
�" means Intenral will be Computed
Flow Duration from Time Series File:pre-developed.tsf
Cutoff Count Frequency CDF Exceedence_Probability
CFS % % %
0.020 60771 99.105 99.105 0.895 0.895E-02
0.116 549 0.895 100.000 0.000 O.O00E+00
0.212 0 0.000 100.000 0.000 O.O00E+00
0.308 0 0.000 1�0.000 0.000 O.O00E+00
0.404 0 0.000 100.000 0.000 O.O00E+00
0.500 0 0.000 100.000 0.000 O.O00E+00
0.596 0 0.000 100.000 0.000 O.O00E+00
0.692 0 0.000 100.000 0.000 O.O00E+00
0.788 0 0.000 100.000 0.000 O.O00E+00
0.884 0 0.000 100.000 0.000 O.O00E+00
0.980 0 0.000 100.000 0.000 O.O00E+00 ,
1.08 0 0.000 100.000 0.000 O.O00E+00 �
1.17 0 0.000 100.000 0.000 O.O00E+00 '
1.27 0 0.000 100.000 0.000 O.O00E+00
1.36 0 0.000 100.000 0.000 O.O00E+00
1.46 0 0.000 100.000 0.000 O.O00E+00
1.56 0 0.000 100.000 0.000 O.O00E+00 ,
1.65 0 0.000 100.000 0.000 O.O00E+00
1.75 0 0.000 100.000 0.000 O.O00E+00
1.84 0 0.000 100.000 0.000 O.O00E+00
1.94 0 0.000 100.000 0.000 O.O00E+00
2.04 0 0.000 100.000 0.000 O.O00E+00
2.13 0 0.000 100.000 0.000 O.O00E+00
2.23 0 0.000 100.000 0.000 O.O00E+00
2.32 0 0.000 100.000 0.000 O.O00E+00
2.42 0 0.000 100.000 0.000 O.O00E+00 '�
2.52 0 0.000 100.000 0.000 O.O00E+00
2.61 0 0.000 100.000 0.000 O.O0�E+00
2.71 0 0.000 100.000 0.000 O.O00E+00
2.80 0 0.000 100.000 0.000 O.OQOE+00
2.90 0 0.000 100.000 0.000 O.O00E+00
3.00 0 0.000 100.000 0.000 O.O00E+00
3.09 0 0.000 100.000 0.000 O.O00E+00
3.19 0 0.000 100.000 0.000 O.O00E+00
3.28 0 0.000 100.000 0.000 O.O00E+00
3.38 0 0.000 100.000 0.000 O.O00E+00
VAULT SIZING
� � � ,� X
Effective Storage Depth before Overflow[Ft) 11.90 ?�
Elevation at 0 Stage [Ft] 419.1�
Riser Head [Ft] 11.90
Riser Diameter[In] 12
Number of Orifices 2�
Top of Riser
t' Notched � Flat
POINT of Compliance Setup I
Edit Test HYDROGRAPH Parameters I
Define RISER Orifices and Notch I
Iterate then sa�e to Dutralt.rdf I
This program can estimate design for at most 3 orifices
Q(max) Orifice #1 = 4/3 of 50% of 2 Year = 4/3 * 0.02 = 0.026 cfs
� • i - � ���
Orifice Definitions ?J
Orifice 2: Enter Height[FtJ � � � �
Orifice 1: Enter Q-Max[CFSj 0.026
Entries Complete I
Enter the stage elevation of orifice
Detention Facilitv Desi_qn
Retention/Detention Facility
Type of Facility: Detention Vault
Facility Length: 63.00 ft
Facility Width: 18.00 ft
Facility Area: 1139. sq. ft
Effective Storage Depth: 12.00 ft
Stage 0 Elevation: 419.10 ft
Storage Volume: 13608. cu. ft
Riser Head: 12.00 ft
Riser Diameter: 12.00 inches
Number of orifices: 2
Full Head Pipe
Orifice 1k Height Diameter Discharge Diameter
(ft) (in) (CFS) (in)
1 0.00 0.50 0.023
2 6.50 0.88 0.096 9.0 I
Top Notch Weii: None
Outflow Rating Curve: None
Stage Elevaticn Storage Discharge Percolation
(ft) (ft) (cu. ft) (ac-ft) (cfs) {cfs)
0.00 419.10 0. 0.000 0.000 0.00
0.01 919.11 11. 0.000 0.001 0.00
0.02 919.12 23. 0.001 0.001 0.00
0.03 919.13 39. 0.001 0.001 0.00
0.09 919.14 95. 0.001 0.001 0.00
0.05 919.15 57. 0.001 0.001 0.00
0.25 419.35 289. 0.007 0.003 0.00
0.45 419.55 510. 0.012 0.005 O.OG
0.66 419.76 748. 0.017 0.005 O.GO
0.86 919.96 975. 0.022 0.006 0.00
1.06 920.16 1202. 0.028 0.007 O.C �
1.27 920.37 1440. 0.033 0.008 0.00
1.47 920.57 1667. 0.038 0.008 O.G
1.67 420.77 1694. 0.043 0.009 0.('
1.86 420.98 2132. 0.099 0.009 0.
2.08 421.18 2359. 0.059 0.010 0.
2.28 921.38 2586. 0.059 0.010 0.�
2.49 921.59 2829. 0.065 0.011 0.'
2.69 421.79 3051. 0.070 0.011 0.
2.89 921.99 3277. 0.075 0.012 0.
3.10 422.20 3515. 0.081 0.012 0.
3.30 422.90 3742. 0.086 0.012 0.
3.50 422.60 3969. 0.091 0.013 0.
3.71 422.81 4207. 0.097 0.013 0.0 :
3.91 923.01 4934. 0.102 0.013 0.0::
4.11 923.21 9661. 0.107 0.014 O.C.:
9.32 423.92 9899. 0.112 0.019 0.00
4.52 923.62 5126. 0.118 0.014 0.00
4.72 423.82 5353. 0.123 0.015 0.00
4.93 424.03 5591. 0.128 0.015 0.00
5.13 429.23 5817. 0.134 0.015 0.00
5.34 929.49 6056. 0.139 0.016 0.00
5.54 924.64 6282. 0.199 0.016 0.00
5.74 924.84 6509. 0.199 0.016 O.00
5.95 425.05 6797. 0.155 0.017 O.C�
6.15 425.25 6979. 0.160 0.017 O.C;
6.35 925.95 7201. 0.165 0.017 O.CC
6.50 425.60 7371. 0.169 0.017 O.OG
Stage Elevation Storage Discharge Percolation
(ft) (ft) (cu. ft) (ac-ft) (cfs) (cfs)
6.51 925.61 7382. 0.169 0.017 0.00
6.52 925.62 7394. 0.170 0.018 0.00
6.53 425.63 7405. 0.170 0.019 0.00
6.59 925.64 7916. 0.170 0.020 0.00
6.55 925.65 7928. 0.171 0.022 0.00
6.56 925.66 7939. 0.171 0.023 0.00
6.57 425.67 7450. 0.171 0.023 0.00
6.78 925.88 7689. 0.177 0.029 0.00
6.98 926.08 7915. 0.182 0.032 0.00
7.18 426.28 8192. 0.187 0.035 0.00
7.39 926.99 8380. 0.192 0.038 0.00
7.59 426.69 8607. 0.198 0.090 0.00
7.79 426.89 8834. 0.203 0.043 0.00
8.00 427.10 9072. 0.208 0.045 0.00
8.20 927.30 9299. 0.213 0.046 0.00
8.40 427.50 9526. 0.219 0.098 0.00
8.61 927.71 9764. 0.224 0.050 0.00
8.81 427.91 9991. 0.229 0.052 0.00
9.01 428.11 10217. 0.235 0.053 0.00
9.22 428.32 10955. 0.290 0.055 O.00 '
9.42 428.52 10682. 0.295 0.056 O.OG
9.62 428.72 10909. 0.250 0.058 0.00
9.83 928.93 11197. 0.256 0.059 0.00
10.03 929.13 11374. 0.261 0.060 0.00 ,
10.23 929.33 11601. 0.266 0.062 0.00
10.44 429.54 11839. 0.272 0.063 0.00
10.69 429.79 12066. 0.277 0.069 0.00
10.89 429.99 12293. 0.282 0.066 0.00
11.05 430.15 12531. 0.288 0.067 O.00
11.25 930.35 12758. 0.293 0.068 O.OQ
11.45 430.55 12984. 0.298 0.069 O.OG
11.66 430.76 13222. 0.304 0.070 O.OG
11.86 430.96 13499. 0.309 0.071 O.Ou
12.00 431.10 13608. 0.312 0.072 0.00
12.10 431.20 13721. 0.315 0.381 0.0�";
12.20 431.30 13835. 0.318 0.944 0.�-
12.30 931.40 13948. 0.320 1.670 0.�
12.40 931.50 19062. 0.323 2.970 O.0
12.50 931.60 14175. 0.325 2.750 O,G:i
12.60 431.70 14286. 0.328 3.000 O.uU
12.70 431.60 19402. 0.331 3.240 0.00
12.80 931.90 19515. 0.333 3.460 0.00
12.90 432.00 14629. 0.336 3.660 0.00
13.00 932.10 19792. 0.338 3.860 0.00
Hyd Inflow Outflow Peak Storage
Target Calc Stage Elev (Cu-Ft) (Ac-Ft',
1 0.45 0.13 0.26 12.06 931.16 13675. 0.319
2 0.22 ******* 0.07 11.63 930.73 13165. 0.303
3 0.23 ******* 0.06 10.33 929.93 11719. 0.269
4 0.27 ******* 0.06 9.35 928.95 10601. 0.243
5 0.24 **'**** 0.05 8.65 427.75 9812. 0.225
6 0.14 ******* 0.03 6.88 425.98 7806. 0.179
7 0.18 ******* 0.02 6.37 425.47 7229. 0.16E
8 0.20 ******* 0.01 4.88 423.98 5529. 0.12�
Route Time Series through Facility
Inflow Time Series File:dev.tsf
Outflow Time Series File:RDOut
Inflow/Outflow Analysis
Peak Inflow Discharge: 0.451 CFS at 6:00 on Jan 9 in Year 8
Peak Outflow Discharge: 0.255 CFS at 9:00 on Jan 9 in Year B
Peak Reservoir Stage: 12.06 Ft
Peak Reservoir Elev: 431.16 Ft
Peak Reservoir Storage: 13675. Cu-�t
. 0.314 Ac-Ft
Flow Duration from Time Series File:rdout.tsf
Cutoff Count Frequency CDF Exceedence_Probability
CFS 8 $ �
0.001 31686 51.673 51.673 48.327 0.483E+00
0.003 6898 11.249 62.922 37.078 0.371E+00
0.005 3233 5.272 68.195 31.805 0.318E+00
0.007 6353 10.360 78.555 21.445 0.214E+00
0.009 3978 6.987 85.042 19.958 0.150E+00
0.011 3642 5.939 90.982 9.018 0.902E-01
0.013 1603 2.940 93.922 6.078 0.608E-01
0.015 1650 2.691 96.613 3.387 0.339E-01
0.017 1093 1.782 98.395 1.605 0.160E-01
0.019 520 0.848 99.243 0.757 0.757E-02
0.021 17 0.028 99.271 0.729 0.729E-02
0.022 11 0.018 99.289 0.711 0.711E-02
0.024 45 0.073 99.362 0.638 0.638E-02
0.026 49 0.072 99.939 0.566 0.566E-02
0.028 38 0.062 99.996 0.504 0.509E-02
0.030 39 0.069 99.560 0.940 0.440E-02
0.032 28 0.096 99.605 0.395 0.395E-02
0.034 26 0.042 99.698 0.352 0.352E-02
0.036 15 0.024 99.672 0.328 0.328E-02
0.038 13 0.021 99.693 0.307 0.307E-02
0.040 16 0.026 99.720 0.280 0.280E-02
0.092 12 0.020 99.739 0.261 0.261E-02
0.049 10 0.016 99.755 0.245 0.295E-02
0.046 29 0.047 99.803 0.197 0.197E-02
0.048 21 0.034 99.837 0.163 0.163E-02
D.O50 16 0.026 99.863 0.137 0.137E-02
0.052 8 0.013 99.876 0.129 0.124E-02
0.059 12 0.020 99.896 0.109 0.104E-02
0.056 11 0.018 99.914 0.086 0.864E-03
0.057 7 0.011 99.925 0.075 0.750E-03
0.059 14 0.023 99.948 0.052 0.522E-03
0.061 8 0.013 99.961 0.039 0.391E-03
0.063 8 0.013 99.979 0.026 0.261E-03
0.065 3 0.005 99.979 0.021 0.212E-03
0.067 3 0.005 99.984 0.016 0.163E-03
0.069 5 0.008 99.992 0.008 0.815E-04
4
1
0�
O
o RDUut dur = �
pr�deveioped dur • �
r R �
o �
o �
cfl �
O
O
� �� I
O I
� �
LL
V «�.,;
�
m o �.;
rn
� o
L
V
N
Q M
Q �r
O �
N i4
O
O O0 .___ ___
O
O `�
O
O
O �
10-5 10-4 10-3 10 -� 10-� 10�
Probability 6cceedence
Duration Comparison Anayisis I
Base File: pre-developed.tsf
New File: rdout.tsf
Cutoff Units: Discharge in CFS
-----Fraction of Time----- ---------Check of Tolerance-------
Cutoff Base New �Change Probability Base New �Change
0.020 I 0.90E-02 0.73E-02 -18.9 � 0.90E-02 0.02a 0.017 -14.2
0.029 I 0.63E-02 0.64E-02 1.6 � 0.63E-02 0.024 0.025 0.9
0.029 I 0.49E-02 0.49E-02 -0.7 � 0.99E-02 0.029 0.029 -0.2
0.033 I 0.37E-02 0.38E-02 2.7 � 0.37E-02 0.033 0.034 0.3
0.038 � 0.28E-02 0.31E-02 9.8 � 0.28E-02 0.038 0.090 5.0
0.042 � 0.21E-02 0.26E-02 22.3 � 0.21E-02 0.092 0.095 7.3
0.047 � 0.15E-02 0.18E-02 19.4 ( 0.15E-02 0.097 0.049 3.9
0.051 � 0.11E-02 0.12E-02 15.2 � 0.11E-02 0.051 0.053 3.9
0.056 � 0.78E-03 0.82E-03 4.2 � 0.78E-03 0.056 0.057 1.3
0.060 � 0.99E-03 0.44E-03 0.0 � 0.94E-03 0.060 0.060 0.0
0.065 � 0.26E-03 0.21E-03 -18.8 � 0.26E-03 0.065 0.064 -1.9
0.069 � 0.15E-03 0.65E-04 -55.6 I 0.15E-03 0.069 0.067 -2.8
0.074 � 0.65E-04 O.00E+00 -100.0 I 0.65E-04 0.079 0.070 -5.7
0.078 I 0.16E-04 O.00E+00 -100.0 � 0.16E-04 0.078 0.070 -10.6
Maximum positive excursion = 0.004 cfs ( 9.7$)
occurring at 0.091 cfs on the Base Data:pre-developed.tsf
and at 0.095 cfs on the New Data:rdout.tsf
Maximum negative excursion = 0.004 cfs (-19.6$)
occurring at 0.021 cfs on the Base Data:pre-developed.tsf
and at 0.017 cfs on the New Data:rdout.tsf
ri I
Wetpool Sizing Calculations I,
Per 2005 King County Stormwater Management Manual ',
Project Name: Duvall 8 Short Plat(revised 4-8-2009)
Project Number: LUA-06-031
Facility Description: Wetpool storage
Step 1: Identify required wetpool volume factor(f).
f= 3 Per KCSWDM 6.4.1.1
Step 2: Determine rainfall (R)for the mean annual storm.
R= 0.47 Per KCSWDM Fig. 6.4.1.A
Step 3: Calculate runoff from the mean annual storm (V,)for the developed site.
V�_ (0.9A;+ 0.25A,9 + 0.10A,�+0.01Ao)x (R/ 12)
where: A; = Impervious Surface Area= 33,977 s.f.
At9=Till Grass Area = 16,988 s.f.
A� =Till Forest Area = 0 s.f.
Ao =Outwash Area = 0 s.f.
V�= 1,364 C.f.
Step 4: Calculate required wetpool volume(Vb).
Vb= fxV�
Vb= 4,092 c.f.