The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutLUA-04-061RENTON - -/2TH-·-.-:~ '-,,-:,. ~ -°,75' roo--~I~~I~To;t:l~i --........................ .. 'A I""l (""I" -C N ~' ~ O.3IAC~ N: ATLAS OF SEATTLE 7:i.. /z, 0 I COPYRIGHTED! PUBLISHED BY =---:~---j '\: KROll MAP COMPANY. INC .• SEATTLE . C"'r ._.- IU6 T.l. I 21'4"~ ~ ~ J: <t SCALE 1 INCH ~ 200 FEET -I. EJ " " q80 U ITS I, I I ~A!lUKI"": r.l~03 '---' Ij<l ,-;:-::.:-:-::, ,_. r--J --, 'I Ac. FU~SET:,,;rJ~ 'IG~I~ i LJ ~---------,i.' il+-=''''1Hil " I 36.57 0.90 AC ' ______________ 1 _~' A CONDOMINIUM .' I.~O Ac. T£.J4 . , /s II~ LAURENCE J ERN E5 T ~ a ;t <0 ~ ~ N 1,10 Ac, T,l.80 189.51 '8 0.\0 Ac. 289.7Z T.UJO uj :> i.' II q; -'I GO ~ " I II 24 DEVELOPMENT PLANNING CITY OF RENTON JUN to 2004 RECEIVED E 'h 8~23-5 RE NTON -/2TH-'-,~", . , , , " Ie 1 '. , ,{'" o 'I v>' [ ::1' I I N ; , 0 ' 0' .., I ~ ----------f..""if.iH < . c"r ATLAS OF SEATTLE COPYRIGHTED &. PUBLISHED BY KROLL MAP COMPANY, INC., SEATTLE SCALE 1 INCH· 200 FEET ., ',.,' -"45" ~ " , , 2 114~ I- ~ 3 : <l ,4 , ....I , 5 ' ,6 ri" /~s p T.L.133 " 9 T. t, 134 0&3 Ac ~ 10 I LAURENCE J ERNEST ~ O{2.. "\\-\ RENTON 1,10 Ac. T.L,80 Z89.51 'S OIDAe 289.72 1.(./30 Park 72 Zl S'UNSET] I~ NORTH ~ ~ A COND,'~ [IOO,;2~TS N ~ n 10 • 60 ff 12 1 ~ 22 :t ~ Illl , , , /5 II~ IZ7. ~L 'l- 24 111.7 ~ 23 , , • 22 'J 21 ~ ~ L!.,:~ , 1<1(1, • o . " E '/:< 8-23-:' RENTON A TLAS OF SEA TTLE r:opvHIG.nEO ~ P'J£llISrlED BY KROLL MAP COMPANY, INC., SEATTlE SCAlE • INCH' 200 ~EET --170"' ~ I " ,', ., " " n: .1' c/,I)J " "',1)4 '10, Ob3~L ., " <I -' 0 ~OIZ--r\\ y.fRENTON B W~29-23-5 ,>' ~-'V'-'· ,,~ 1 ? l' " " . .1, , L,!:: _ <J', i';j" ,. o h , I' I~-!~ I :~i Rf.vl5rONS ,li EDMUNDS AVE N.E. ---I~::-k-. -~"~'"~:-: .... -----~i '" , " " ~~'" ¥:o~ c' j t :[;~C c.." _f~UR~C~ ~ ~_ , '. 'I" ,·_" •• r "'r-~l> :;;Z :':'c ,: en ~n ':ll> 9"'C1 m "'CI ~ Z 'e;J~,~.~,~g~~'C.~ :§i'·f. "'i'~' [to /' .,. j 'C~ 1= f! ~~ i ,/ I, 1 ,~, , i ___ _ "' ... ~it_,,",,=" ~ ~ g ;:; NO ~\'-I' "~ , :/ ',I ~i "-. .. " . -. -'-·I·'·~h i: I I'lj "lR , :' , " I ~~I~'_,-_ ,""'.' """" " ""If '* qJ ',\' '0 W <@ w<!i'f(J:,; I' ,0, J <il I' 'I. • I " ". I i ": .. --.~"~ii\ I crJl 'I t I ; c:: \ ~" ~z I' \ ',' ~ '1'3 ! If I I,' ! ~O :3! III Ei CI j~ j'~" :, " l' !;~ I~ : ~ I' ,,: It I "l ., I /0 I ' i' i ' "., 1 ./~ ... , .. ,,1/ !, I . , ~O :::~/C} i ,(," i i i , c,-• i..:'.:.!':'1,~-..:'J , /: ? /, , , " ,~':::;f!:!:J ".---~",= :: L E :~ ,,' ~ v ('1'-, l ' , .'. ,0 :: ~ f ?: > I;:: Jilil Lr~ ~'~'~'~p .. ~ ; ~'.~S ;, ~"J',. m " ~ i;' " ~ ~. , 1 ~ .---- :? :\ :~ I-JA5SER A~Hv1ADNlr\ EDMUNDS AVE NE Rt.:NTON. WA ( ; .. ~ p~ i-\O'-' ~~~ ~.~ ~ ~!~ :l¥ rr" "-, i~ '" ",6 U ~~ £"i' {it ~o \'2~ n~ t ~\ > ('<,:\v >,)7""" s ~. c ~ c: If: ~ ~:~ , i" , I'~ • is '';- ':; , ,~ RONALD D. JOHNSON ARCHil tel '.," ".'~" " ~ J ~. 'I I,. 'i .-'," " " . . , ~; SHEET TITLE LAN DSCAFE FLAN '/lnl M, S I '9019 :llllll:l:l>-lS I ~W","'-, .. " ., "'1.",'1',' lJ;l.lI\-lJ~V NOC;NI-jOr '0 OWNOj p " " II ~~ ~~__ ---:-.. =---:-1 ~"II,~ '11=,Fi:=i I! f~_ II' 0 __ 'I' -~---'--II , ~- i ":' 'rir,n.n --"I i o D ---' ([l I' _ " I •• I z Ob ~-> II li..J '~ ---'" lLJ:::: V/''/\ ·NO.LNJ~ IN ;l/W £ONnVIJO;J VINOV~"HW 2lJ££VN 0 " ~:' , , ;:1 '>: " , < ~ -;t ::; ~g , -; , ~; i .;, ,- ~ " j " I I )~ : I _"N"" 11;]1;] ;] "N I '90l9 ;]lllll;];]e1S ~G~"I .r, '1, ',. '." , '. ,\, ::,,-, ""'-, J:);J,LlID:,y NOSNI-IOrO OWNOeJ :}]': , I ,.' ·:"iEj.!' ,1 • ,~: :~;:.; I :; ;;~':;1~;.,;,~ '~D':':" • : : ; > ,-~,'::: -'" • _ ,":_f=~-~-I" -=-'_'_ ,~., ':,:_:. -----=",----~--" -, , , I ~~~~~~~,--=~I , .~-~ l!iE":,::-.,,Tr=lf'~, ~I,=', ~I~, 1 f,-I~ E=i!!t;ti qtilll : I = .. I I: lLi : : I :\)~ Ii -" "ilt '" ~ -;-u • 1 ~ "I " 1 ,', 1 ' ~ 1 ( ~ ',1 1 "I ~" ~, (01 ~'I ~, ;,1 !I ;~ .~I ?;: ;:, .0 I ",I'r Zl 0 1. 1-15' -< II [GI· --'''" tLJ::- I: I-" nLlLJ 0;'5 Z<fl ': VM N01N;)~ '°:;IN;JAV ·GoNn0K1~ ~INiiWJ"'i';i;f££VN • , ~~) "~,I i ::6 ~~ ;;, ~~ ~I 0 :;:1 , /; ;, Q ~ b <;NOIC;II\J~ ~ ~ ~ If") ------;...----: --=)1 " _,,"l_~ i '-':l--.. 1:1-9, 'I . :~I 10 , 'D 'b;; -II d, CO! ;19 0''-1-::tu :I>~ II~- tLJ! ., ,l-llLJ Ul« _u-<Iu _:,u.J If) , ,,'ar ] .«,"'" r"., 1.11.""0 00"\:0' •• <1".«"" < " .:!~ i' I , '" ~I , II ':l' ~ -~ '" ,-'. -i --.---------.. ~ ----:----l,-~-; ~;~'~~~~"03 ____ ~ __ "::~ __ ~ -----~·'~-;~-T-·'~-~--~-----~;-:j - _____ L__________ ~l! q l\:O.LN311 .'10 }",L1J - - --------- ---:------- l ______ ~ .. " •.. "-)'''''1 All I ' ,,- ----- "m l.I'''''' IH8' I."."'" fl- ~.".r;.." -~-, .! .'" .. ".""'" SI' •. <;t,""" " ~~ I C I a... « ::2 '.;( -.J a... l-• , • • • N i , 9 I ! 9 , ~ • i , , , • CC 0 I Cf) >-CC « Ii' Z ::2 I I -.J I W I CC I a... I ,; ,: • I, I,: I"",w'll"~ I' I -~" I I I I \ ,-" J.<,~<"" I ....... ,--I \ ',~' I.'~--'«"" .1 \ I ~ __ ."". I I- -0(,001 8 I!I II:i I~ ~~i M~ ~ . I i I I" I II !a~' '~j ~I~il " " 1;-) ~I ) ~ r " .1 ;; i' " ~ w z 'I I -I • \ ~ . I o ~~:'~'\~~ ~~_____ ____ ~~_~~~~~"~"a3_. ____ :'::~' __ . ____ =J ___ .. _-.-_._''' _________ : ___ ~~ --~-&---I 01, . I ------[--~=~-=-·=~~~--~=~-~-~~--~~j_~=i__=~ __ ~__ I NOl.N:H1 ~ .W,UIJ WV l _______ _ z S [L ~ W I---z o I- ...J o :::2 w o (I- I T I \ .. at ) ."."~" -,-._-----=-.-'-.. -:;:. ..... ":7.;--...-",,, ........ "". ~--. r---------, · . , . • • ~ '-! : : ! · . · . · . L _________ 0 1 . • r--------------, , 1...-1 · . : r-j , . I "" I · , . · . · . I 1_, L ______________ ~ l.<""~_. • I • I -v - " ~I w z ~I I T ,I, " .• ~. _-_-~ \ I I I ';: ~ - Ill! - o --\ -I . -', 0...:\1) . \~II-'<C::I-,; ";;~~~Nn"a;!'-,,,',;:" --1-•• ~; •.• -Fi~- ------; ----.--------------------.-----------,------------. ---------~----.---: -------------;-:-------1 ----6s----4b-__ ~_____ w: 11 'I ----"--------zi I - -'3---,~ -; ___ ~ __ 0 ___ _ ---___ L--_____________________________ : _______ _ ·'.:r ] L _______ ._ -~-- z <{ ..J a... ~ <{ z <{ c: o :::2 c: ~ o z <{ a z o <{ c: a ('_ 0,' _ , . , , 1 'i roo" •• " ... D' I - +"1 ~ . 'c I N" Z" 'e 3N 3A\if SONn~a:3 ID" .. 'e • , :' "'~ I '" " 'e " ... I w z "-'" -J,_ , -l- -, . I o "'C\ I L;; -_____ .L.--____________________________________ _ 118186 '1M \f"1M)lfU. GA18 1:13.lN~ 0019 SlN3rU.S3MI c't ... "" ... ,,," "" "'. I , o • 'I o , o -, --:...;--~ ,II I -"---'. "'iU '.","'" z <{ -.J Q.. a: w ,,~ .. ,.I. I-~~,~'; <{ ., 3: ~ I o Z <{ a: w 3: w CfJ ~ ~ 00'00, ~ .Of • .00 r--,,·------i-- , , flU, '.II."~. ----~---.- --"l--------l , I ,,: '-+-----liL-:r--:;li~ ,~;;'" o"~"I' -'l( ,'"W-: \r+ ,;, -cj I ~ -~, , r L 11 : , : r4( ) "" :=::J=cr~, ~=--l:i " :, '-IJ 1:p=U _ , ;~:I N I '''\. I ~ j' Z <{ CfJ ~1:: i~ I !J, ~ i~ I r ,~ , I ~ -' II II I ( ,'-,I M.l" ._-I 0 I oil -'-7" .. I mi: ':. ~~:,.;::, !,.r:~: ~l~ ; I I' Ill! I I: ,,! , I I 1-o',~_];:;;I~I~"'" 'Ii ;ll!rj9i/1 ' t,'~, t, vJ::'=.,~-'----,,+--=!-" COt ----It.jl' -,-LllCL, ~---'-=~ , '---------.r ,0: "" I f"'" ," ~~": \ ~~~ '\ I I L ::; 1 ' I I ) ~ ,)'i \ • ',. I'O~\O' ~ "-.~~,,ool--.;: -. -., f I 1-" \ !' -r~~~-~~~-j:, l-rr ',' 1 -I II -+- -/1 } , I ~ ~I w z " ;;:1 l);r . I I "" \ I '_I" -I. I y \; j 1 , °1 -'. -1)_EtV:-_", I _00," I -y-I _ ~ _ L j ~,_ ... tt, L, __ ---l-.n_ .'~ "".,0.\. I '--I '.......------T' "'.,.,,'u. ..<.~.-=-, ~ • ~ I 3N 3M SaNn~G3 ) • I I ~~ I I • (Ill 'J ---,'--I----·-r------I'---'---.:;----·-----------,------------.----------/"----.---,-_____________________ _ --,,-.-&---~--~ s;!1 t q i >l -___ .. ________ " ~: L -----"'--~" , -t----:---s. ___ _ ------ ----------------.. -----------I ----, --- B9196 '1M '\fl\M)U\l QA 18 1:/3.l.N3::lI-Uf\O 0019 SJ.N3ru.S3ANI tV I l ______ -< •.• '"I J (f) -.J ~ ill 0 0 z « (f) ill I-0 Z -.J 0 i!= z 0 () z 0 ~ I-Z ill :::; 15 ill (f) 0 z « z 0 Vi 0 a:: ill 88196 "1M '\flIM)lfU (]AlB I::I:uN3OH.lIlOS 00.9 SlN3rt1.S3m ev ''''"_,1L''''1'''', . ' February 29, 2008 Kamal Dhlai 24020 1 1 8th Place SE Kent, Washington 98030 CIT*F RENTON I'lanning/Building/Public Works Department Gregg Zimmerman P.E., Administrator SUBJECT: PAZOOKITOWNHOUSES SITE PLAN APPROVAL TIME EXTENSION REQUEST (FILE NO. LUA04,061) Dear Mr. Dhlai: This office has received your request to extend an approved siteplari (File No. LUA04-061) pursuant to RMC 4-9,220L.2. Specifically, the Renton Municipal Code allows the original approval body to issue a single two (2) year extension. Since the final site approval on thIS project w~s granted on September20; 2004 and expired on , September 20, 2006, this time extensiori' is being gninted retroactively. Please be advised that this office is empowered to issue qnly'one such extension.' ' Therefore, your request fOf'anextension of time on the site plan approva)is granted: The site . plan approval will expire on Septeniber20,2008. Allworkdehneated in tile site planapproval must be completed by this date. No further extensions Qftime will be granted on this project. Please feel free to contact Gerald Wasser, As~ociateP;anner at (425)431)-7382 shollld you have any questions or commynts regarding tliis time,extension. ' . Sincerely, " NeJtUi$; Neil Watts, Director . '. Development Services Division. cc: file Gentld-Wasser Cimie Olson ~~~.ce· .~\D~o~cumll~lCm;'Jt~s-amll&d&Se~tt~iil~gS~'%~"~As~se~I\~r'1~)~~~6e~"ffi1ll~~~*-tts~)P~BE~'~81&~i+TB~.&~8~e\~g--~~------~~~~~. ~ 1055 South Grady Way -Renton, Washington 98057 * T.hi~ paperc'ontains 50%'recycl~ materi~I. 3~i'lo post ~nsum~r CITI'OFRENTON R,~~~~: BUlilllNGDIVISION " G< .J-'ii':"y\~ 1. '" S (;.-// LEiK:.G ~\t/~ !II,:> C"h.oeo:', <: FofL L",,,, /-oiL. L l) 4 0 ~ -0& I A s -:l. "d ~~tY>1J>,..vlIr \ S l-d-. b~ ""0>,\ ~ 1'hl6" (V. b ~~ V''\CJ'''-.. wit. ~.g C'" S -,. \.( ""-""" 1)-1.. ~ '" \.. p" 1- '2v~. 2C \ _ ~, \ ~ L l( D?-6 \ I .g 1-v, \lL-~.c l:t=,0" \ ~D>,." C\.(3 "" s <> ~-- DATE: TO: FROM: SUBJECT: PLANNING/BUILDING/ PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT MEMORANDUM February 25, 2008 File LUA04-161 Pazooki Short Plat Jennifer Henning, Planning Manage~ Expiration of Short Plat File No. LUA04-061 ~ The short plat application for the above-referenced tile expired on September 20,2006. The applicant did not seek an extension. However, the Site Plan Review may remain valid until September 20,2008, provided the applicant submits a request to extend the approval. In order to vest the project approval, the applicant will need to submit a complete building permit application prior to the new expiration period of September 20, 2008 cc: Mike Dotson Carrie Olson h:\d i vision.s\dcvclop.ser\dev&plan. i ng\jth\tcmplates\standardmcmo I .doc August 22, 2006 Kamal Dhlai 24323 I 19th Avenue SE Kent, W A 98030 CIT' ,OF RENTON Planning/Building/PublicWorks Department Gregg Zimmerman P.E., Administrator SUBJECT: Pazooki Townhomes Short Plat Extension Request (Filf: No. LUA04-061) Dear Mr. Dhlai: This office has reviewed your request to extend an approved short plat (File No. LUA04-061) pursuant to RMC 4-7-070M. Specifically. the municipal code allows the original approving body to issue a single one (I) year extension. As the decision was issued on September 20, 2004, your request is timely. Further, as you noted in your correspondence that you are currently completing the short plat requirements; however, you were delayed as a result of financial issues, it appears reasonable to approve the requested extension. You should be aware this office is empowered to issue only one such extension. If the final short plat approval is not completed by September 20, 2007 it will expire and cannot be extended again. Therefore, your short plat extension request is approve,d. The short plat will expire on September 20,2007. Please feel free to contact·me at (425) 430-7286 should you have any further questions or comments regarding this extension. Jennifer Toth Henning, AICP Current Planning Manager cc: file Carrie Olson CII¥OFRENTOI'. RECEIVED MAY 14 2,j.c BU1lDINGDIVIs/ON -------------1-0-SS--So-u-th-G-r-ad-y-w--~---R-e-nt-o-n,-w-a-s-hi-ng-t-on-.-9-S0-S-s-------------~ @ This paper contains 50% recycled material, 30% post consumer AI-lEAD OF THE CURVE ~.~ .... '''if ..& -. CIT~ OF RENTON PIanningIBuildingfPublicWorks Department Gregg Zimmerman P,E~Administrator Kathy Keolker·Wbeeler, Mayor August 3, 2004 A3 Investments LLC Omied Pazooki 6100 Southcenter Blvd. #250 Tukwila, W A 98188 SUBJECT: PAZOOKI TOWNHOUSES SHORT PLA T REQUEST FOR MODIFICATION Dear Mr. Pazooki: The City of Renton has received your street modification request associated with the proposed 2-lot multi- family short plat located generally at the intersection of Edmonds Avenue NE and NE 10" Place. This is an infill development in an existing neighborhood with access proposed from Edmonds Avenue NE although there is frontage on both rights-of-way. NE 10" Place is public right-of-way that currently provides access to an apartment building and at least one single-family residence. The ·proposed modification requests a waiver of street improvements on NE 10m Place. The Street Modification request is hereby approved subject to three (3) conditions as listed below. City Code 4-6-050 (Street Standards) requires full street improvements for all adjacent rights-of-way for, within and dedicated by a plat. The City can modify street improvements for new plats if there are practical difficulties in carrying out the provisions of the Street Improvement Ordinance. The Modification Procedures as defined in Section 4-9- 250D clearly states the criteria for approval by the Department Administrator. In order for a modification to be approved, the Department Administrator must "find that a special individual reason makes the strict letter of this Ordinance impractical, that the modification is in conformity with the intent and purpose of this Ordinance, and that such modification: (a) Will meet the objectives and safety, function, appearance, environmental protection and maintainability intended by this Ordinance. based upon sound engineering judgment; and (b) Will not be injurious to other property(s) in the vicinity; and (c) Conform to the intent and purpose of the Code; and (d) Can be shown to be justified and required for the use and situation intended; and (e) Will not create adverse impacts to other properties in the vicinity." Meets objectives and safety. function: NE 10" Place is a dead-end at this location with no possibility of extension. It currently serves as access for an apartment building and single-family homes. The' intent of public and emergency access and pedestrian amenities is nqt met with the modification as proposed, but can be mitigated by condition of providing a minimum of20-feet of pavement, no parking signage to protect the access, and a pedestrian walkway. This provides emergency access to an portions o(the proposed project, safe pedestrian movement, and continued access both domestic and emergency to all the properties. Not injurious or adversely impact adjacent properties: Adjacent properties are not injured nor adversely impacted as all construction occurs within existing right-of-way. Conforms to the intent of the code: The intent of providing for the city street network is met with the insuring and protecting the minimum pavement width and installing a pedestrian walkway in the frontage of the short plat along NE 10" Place. ------------71o~5~5~S~0~ut7h~G~ra~d~y~W7a-y--~R-en~to-n-.~W7a~Sh~in-g~to-n-9~8~0~55~-----------~ ® This paper contains 50% recycled matllrial, 30% post consumer AIIEAD 01' THE CURVE r Justified and required for use and situation intended: The zoning of this parcel is RM-C, Residential Multi- family. Suburban Center. The modifications as requested allow the maximum density and number of units that still meet the various setbacks and access criteria. The plat provides the minimum necessary for full use for access, emergency and domestic. as well as pedestrian amenities. The Street Modification is approved subject to the following conditions: 1. If not currently existing, 20·feet minimum width of pavement (not including the required walkway) shall be provided for the full frontage along NE IOIh Place. This is subject to verification, and if needed, installation prior to occupancy of any unit. 2. In any location where there is less than 28 feet of pavement, "No Parking" signage shall be installed on both sides of the right-of-way prior to occupancy of any unit. 3. A live foot wide pedestrian walk way shall be constructed and delineated along the south side of NE IOIh Place to the satisfaction of the Development Services Division prior to occupancy of any unit. This decision to approve the proposed Street Modification is subject to a fourteen (14) day appeal period from the date of this letter. Any appeals of the administrative decision must be filed with the City of Renton Hearing Examiner by 5:00 p.m., August 18,2004. Appeals must be filed in writing together with the required $75.00 application fee with: Hearing Examiner, City of Renton, 1055 South Grady Way, Renton, WA 98055. Appeals to the Examiner are governed by City of Renton Municipal Code Section 4-8-110. Additional information regarding the appeal process may be obtained from the Renton City Clerk's Office, (425) 430- 6510. If you have any questions, please contact Michael Dotson at (425) 430-7304. Sincerely, ~13:i:' ~~~~ Development Engineering Supervisor Public Works Inspections & Permits cc: Land Use File Neil Watts Michael Dotson Kathy Keolker, Mayor August 22, 2006 Kamal Dhlai 24323 I 19th Avenue SE Kent, W A 98030 CITY.lF RENTON Planning/Building/Public Works Department Gregg Zimmerman P.E., Administrator SUBJECT: Pazooki Townhomes Short Plat Extension Request (File No. LUA04-061) Dear Mr. D hlai: This office has reviewed your request to extend an approved 'short plat (File No. LUA04-061) pursuant to RMC 4-7-070M, Specifically, the municipal code allows the origimil approving body to issue a single one (I) year extension, As the decision was issued on September 20, 2004, your request is timely, Further, as you noted in your correspondence that you are currently completing the short plat requirements; however, you were delayed as a result of financial issues, it appears reasonable to approve the requested extension. You should be aware this office is empowered to issue only one such extension. If the final short plat approval is not completed by September 20, 2007 it will expire and cannot be extended again .. Therefore, your short plat extension request is approved, The short plat will expire on September 20,2007. Please feel free to contact me at (425) 430-7286 should you have any further questions or comments regarding this extension, . ~;'(Pd;vf~ Jennifer Toth Henning, AICP Current Planning Manager cc: file Carrie Olson -------------1-0~55--S0-u-th-G~r-ad-Y-W--aY~--R-e-n-to-n,-w-a-S-hi-ng-t-on-'-9-80~5-5-------------~ @ This paper contains 50% recycled material, 30% post consumer AHEAD OF THE CURVE •• ~Lf'f'<,G 6X-\"'''''~ S'l-...", )''''''-\-Mrl'-u'''-\ ~ VVl,,\ ~\*-?I ... ", 0~(!l12-ec~ ~iL '\.-OYl~=~ ~I'\,,~ \...l" ""c...~ ~"'~ fl"'1C~'CJ fr6blQ.W1, (is Dr T"~"lf r/U/Ob 4-~o..\\ \"'- rIA II Fe it-W1 '-1 r -l(. nv'l-\ 501 Lv E" 'vJ ,I \ ~\ ~., .\ '0 \-~ 7 ('''''6~d 1'11\-£ r· "-. \VI (\ ?PL t., 1\1 .s ~ \'l b)A oL1-66 I "l r'<<..ll1 Mf(c\Q,J.t~ ~ \-"" '-'. '"" 'n. <>-.0""-. ~,,~ ~ 1I ~ ~ YLf:Y'>"(E: Q"",lL \M c rr, J.-ob~ '2-6)-2 r'I ~ \ < (.\ (1'1 t\l 10k l. /'I -r --z. 4 '?, '2. 3. \ \ '\ \~V'6 <;". c \( CrJ\1 Vi f>... CtBCl'SO CITY OF RENTON PLANNING / BUILDING / PUBLIC WORKS MEMORANDUM Date: October 7, 2004 To: City Clerk's Office From: Stacy M. Tucker Subject: Land Use File Closeout Please complete the following information to facilitate project closeout and indexing by the City Clerk's Office Project Name: Pazooki Townhouses & Short Plat LUA (file) Number: LUA-04-061, SA-A, SHPL-A, ECF Cross-References: AKA's: Pazooki Project (Short Plat & Townhomes) Project Manager: Nancy Weil Acceptance Date: June 24, 2004 Applicant: Siavoosh Pazooki Owner: A3 Investments LLC Contact: Omied Pazooki PID Number: 0923059131 ERC Decision Date: July 20, 2004 ERC Appeal Date: August 9, 2004 Administrative Approval: September 20, 2004 Appeal Period Ends: October 5, 2004 Public Hearing Date: Date Appealed to HEX: By Whom: HEX Decision: Date: Date Appealed to Council: By Whom: Council Decision: Date: Mylar Recording Number: Project Description: An application to divide the exsting parcel of O.31-acres creating two lots each with 6,751.5 sq. ft. The intent of the applicant is to develop a 3-unit triplex on each lot with a shared 26-foot wide access easement. The site is zoned Residential Multi-Family Suburban Center with an existing single-family residence to be removed. The proposal will require review for short plat environmental-(SEPA) review and site plan review. Location: 972 Edmonds Avenue NE Comments: I .. City of Renton Department of Planning / Building / Public Works ENVIRONMENTAL & DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: .J1lL'J. COMMENTS DUE: JULY 9 .,nnA APPLICATION NO: LUA.04.0f" SA.;', SHPL-A, ECF DATE CIRCULATED: J6NE"25~004----~ APPLICANT: Siavoosh Pazooki PROJECT MANAGER! Nancv Wei I / ~ PROJECT TITLE: Pazooki Townhouses Short Plat PLAN REVIEW: t1ke Dotson ./ \ SITE AREA: 13,503 square feet BUILDING AREA (qross): 2,646 squ l LOCATION: 972 Edmonds Ave NE WORK ORDER NO: 77264 (--;/ ~ SUMMARY OF PROPOSAL: An ap lication to divide the existin arcel of 0.31 acres creatin two lots each wit 6,751.5 s uare p 9 P 9 q feet. The intent of the applicant is to develop a 3-unit triplex on each lot with a shared 26-foot wide access easement. The site is zoned Residential Multi-Family Suburban Center with an existing single-family residence to be removed. The proposal will require review for short plat, environmental (SEPA) review and site plan review. _.' A. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT (e,g, Non-Code) COMMENTS Element of the Probable Probable More Element of the Probable Probable More Environment Minor Major Information Impacts Impacts Necessary Environment Minor Major Information Impacts Impacts Necessary Eanh "ousino Air Water Plants LandlShoreline Use Animals IE -; . --i .. . Environmental Heafth Public Services ,/ Energy/ Natural Resources ~ A:f:gggFee, < B, POLICY-RELATED COMMENTS C, CODE·RELATED COMMENTS We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas in which we have expertise and have identified BreBS of probable impact or areas where additional information is needed to property assess this proposal. Cf!MW Signature of Director or Authorized Representative Oate .... / '" , , \.,' . , . '.' '.' , . , , .'j '.', , ., -", ':-. , , '. ',':,';',' ':C,JIir& )F ,RENTON' ,'; : .. ',', ;1,. '.'.:: ',:;' ,.,."." . PiarmirigIBuildinglPublicW6rks Department -.,.,. ' , , " ~' ,,', , , . " ";,' Gregg·Zimmerman P,E., Administrator,' , .' . ,; "'. ,'" ,-, I -., ., .' , " , .\ ; , ' " , , June 28: 2004 ,.' , , '-' :. ' , , ~ , -' , , . '. ,.' ": ''';, . ' .. ' -"' . ... ' ; ," ~~ ,;,:~"~ ;'Ri:""""IEO .' " ." , ",' , .~ ';, '.' . .•.. . ,.' , ,',,~ " ." " .:'. \', ,'-' ; :.~: : ~ ',' . (, Superintendent's 6ffic~' " Fl'eniori'School District #403 300 SWth Stree(··', . . , ',:J~NJ izoo.< ' , , '.,. . , , , : -J ,-, ' . , ... , , OFFICl'vt-fHE '. ' J ':. ;', • , ,: Renton;Wi\ 98,055-239?; , ,,' :, .. '.:' " ':" ,'., '.8UPEIIINT~IiIfP; " • ' .. : :,~ .'.-.,"'OJ ,'-, ,.' .,;,' >', " , c , . , . " " . \ ' . ,~-, " ,'. ' , .' " ., ' " ' ,'. . , " '~ '. ~ , t.:,., '1~'" .,.;1 ~ .; -.... ,.':' ',.~ ',', , ~, ~ ',' " ',. ',' ' I~,:'" ',', ' S~bjeci::.' Eazooki Townho~ses Short Plat I'" ;>-" ' '. ,'" ',. " , ' . , ' .. , • I. ' " .,' :" LUA-04-061, SA~A, SHPL-A, EC,f:, ;;. '. ";/",; ".',. ~':':,>';. ':'.".':' :",',,,,,,,,:,,,,,,,,,:_::_:,~,-,-..-. '.:,:,' ','_": "';'.,,_,"'. ~"','", ", :'.'-:~'_ " "","\1-"", :~::.: , ,. .The' G.ityof RentOn D.evelopment Servic,esDivision has received, an applicationfpi a multi-family. :-., ".'.' ' ::deilelopment I<Jcated' af. 972' Edmonds Avenue., NE,;. 'Rlease see:the .enclosed' Notice, of ",'; ". 'Application'f6riurtl:terdetails:, :.: '. ' ""; .' , '" ,'. ',', ":"'" .-. ' .. ", ,. • , ~, • ,.' •• '. ' • • .-) .. ' <. '::,.-~" "',' .. ,,' ~: .'.'_' ,,' ,., .... .', ._.,-,-~":_\;,,-' .-,", . " .In' order ,toprocess this,application, tlie.,pe"elopment',Services Diyisicin ,neeps to; knqw which': " _ ' " " ':.". " Renton schools 'would'.beattended by children' living'in 'ie'sidences',atthe, lcicatici'n.'indicated ' ,,', ". · '. 'above .. ' Please fill in the' appropriaie:schools'Cm the:listbelow andieturn'this letter. to my':,; ! '. :,' ' : ,'attentioq,'DevelopmSIll.Services Division;, city,oi Renton: Hi55 South': Grady, Way;: Renton:: ' ?, ",' .: ,Washington98655;', ," ,;:'/ >" '" ,',' .:.;",' ," :"<, '. ' ::', ';' " , ; " ',' , Elementary Schooi: """,,-,.-'-~~~~4'!S'~,p..~~!k:..~-,,-:--'--,-'--,-"-:"'~:"" ...:':.....,.;~~.:...,.:~...:,' _' ~",,'.:.:.::: '. '. ' , • ,0 -".' •• ". 't." , ., .~ , . '. "I", ',' \'" ',' ~ -, .', ; . . , ... ' ,~!dOle,School: ,.:' .-'-'-"-----:-'-~:..L!'=.!-""l.="7~:._,_.-'-c--'-'--.-'-' -,-':.,.,' -:---'--'---:....;."-'--_~---' .. _' -,---, ' , ,,: Hi~h S~hoC?1 ::....:':..:,",:,.:.:....:. '-2''':''' .f,.J1d1~Z2k~4~;;.:..2'--' ...:".':::.,,,'_'''_' ~'--;'_~' ':,..':,..' ~".:..." -,-:....:. ';':"'--.:.:'''~:' ;, ~ ;, , ' ',' , "-", ~ \ -' <'" ,. ." . . , ' ~ .... , WiUtheschoolf);You hal/e indicated be able)oti~n~le i~eiTT1pacfof the,additio(lal studE?nts.' .' " ,,', . "esti.mate'd to.comefroJ1lthe:p'ioposea develcip,me.nt(":· Yes' ."j .' No:, ,: .'::.'.' :, . , , ','. ~ . ';'., . , . '.' ~Any 'COInmeni~: ' " , , .-' ",,' . , "", , .. ' : ',',' ' ,,' " .. ' - " ; ,-' , , , "', . ," " . '~' ' .. ~ .' '.' ',J' ',' " , ' , "'." ",'-':', ~-,~, ~', ":" , ,'ihank you' for 'providing:t~isiniport~ni inforniatfon, 'If y6u haVe'~~yqUe~tions regardin'gthis " . . project, please coniacUne cit (425) 430-7270;,'''' ". '.' . ' '," " : .... ",'. '::, _::::,:.:,~,,,, ~_ • -,:. ',"~, -';" •• '.' ":, 'f ' '", '," _: .," .",,:J <, ',~,_" ',.-,/ .. ,SinCer;ly,:: , ' , ", "" "R' ", RSD403 ". ,: . ",' 0'~'J] ... :·"', ··')ULfi ~ mD . " :, \),} .0-. ';',": ",'. . . ", "c,:'" ,.~,~:' 'E:GEiv:'~""\'~ NancyWeil ."";', CA~ITALPR0ICf"T6"'./ ',;:::cia,~ePI~nne~,:,','" .. : ".,: .. '. " >:.:' .,::; '.";~,,, ~~-"-~----'~''':r·.:Cl0::-:5:::5'C:.S'-oU-J:''h-=G'-ra-'d'-Y-:-:W::-a-y--::-R;':;en'-to-n-,"w:-a'-:sh-"in'-g"-'lo"'n"-::'-:~8:-':O-::5"'5',-:'-, -. '--'-,.~.:..:-•• ----..:~·:R·,E N rfa N :,- ,.:".:-,.,-.. ," ',,' .... '®Thi~p8per~~~inS,~%~dad~~~I,~oto~lconsu~er. t· AHEADO"<T:H~ CURVE:,_,. ", , ~. • ,,:' ," , r , ,'. ..,' ~ '. " '~,. ':' ,: .~ , " , , t, ,,' , ' · ' .. ' " " "'. · ~, , ' " ',," ", -;; '~ , I Siavoosh Pazooki 14044 SE 44th Place Bellevue, WA 98006 (applicant) Laurance Anthone MA Quik Framing Inc. PARTIES OF RECORD PAZOOKI TOWNHOUSES SHORT PLAT LUA04-061, SA-A, SHPL-A, ECF Omied Pazooki 3404 NE 6th Street Renton, WA 98056 tel: 206-229-7001 ( contact) A3 Investments LLC 6100 Southcenter Blvd ste: #250 Tukwila, WA 98188 tel: 206-229-2647 (owner) 6000 South Center Blvd ste: # 20 Tukwila, WA 98188 tel: 206-248-2700 (party of record) c:re Kathy Keolker-Wheeler. Mayor October 7,2004 Omied Pazooki 3404 NE 6th Street Renton, WA 98056 .. ~- SUBJECT: PazookiTownhouses LUA04-061, SHPL-A, SA-A, ECF Dear Mr. Pazooki: CITTY 'JF ]RENTON PlanningIBuildinglPublic Works Department Gregg Zimmerman P.E., Administrator This letter is to inform you that the appeal period has ended for .the Administrative Short Plat and Site Plan approval. No appeals were filed. This decision is final and you may proceed with the next step of the short plat process. The enclosed handout, titled "Short Plat Recording," provides detailed information for this process. The advisory notes and conditions listed in the City of Renton Report & Decision dated September 20, 2004 must be satisfied before the short plat can be recorded. If you have any questions regarding the report and decision issued for this short plat proposal, please call me at (425) 430,7270. For questions regarding the recording process for the short plat, as well as for submitting revised plans, you may contact Carrie Olson at (425) 430-7235. Sincerely, Nancy Wei! Associate Planner cc: A3 Investments LLC / Owner Siavoosh Pazooki I Applicant Laurance Anthone I Party of Record Enclosure ~ LoI1l()~ ~ 'F~II~qA~L'O~4·~O~6In.D~O~C~~~--~~~~~~--~~~--~~~------------~RE NT 0 N 1055 South Grady Way -Renton, Washington 98055 * This paper contains 50% recycled material, 30% post consumer AHEAD OF THE CURVE CITY OF RENTON CURRENT PLANNING DIVISION AFFIDAVIT OF SERVICE BY MAILING On the 21 st day of September, 2004, I deposited in the mails of the United States, a sealed envelope containing Administrative Short Plat & Site Plan Land Use Action documents. This information was sent to: I'il':!!,:;" )::tt<ti'lft l"';':'1[:;I', !'~:i!''(i Ut"'T::!, ; '·.,[i'e·" ,,;~r~-_ir·. :";;r.:' :~.1i;~r,i"";.' '(I'-!:;:" . ...... ".. .. , . :' r.· Siavoosh Pazooki Applicant Omied Pazooki Contact A3 Investments LLC Owner Lau rance Anthone Party of Record (Signature of S", ,d"r~ ~.JI .. --1J'/~. /:;.~ " .. ·~lI1c .... J,issro..;(: ... ~ STATE OFWASHIN;TON f f ~.:o~ OT +-<i" -1\ :0 ~ Af:!y:l" "" : ... ~':. ) SS ! .~ en: (/l' '" • COUNTY OF KING ) ~ .... ". UBuC ! "Y,.,. ". .: ~ ~ ··~:<9.01 ..... 0 I certify that I know or have satisfactory evidence that Stacy Tucker 0" WAs~i~0'" si ned this instrument and acknowled ed it to be his/her/their free and voluntar g g y act for \\, purposes mentioned in the instrument. Dated: cOd r;, ~CO(j f Washington MARILYN KAMCHEFF Notary (P ri nt) :---------Owfl¥.4\l0P'I'IPQoIIIINfII+l.oIIoIEIIINT"EiEJ(\f\P;IIIIRE=&S &!6 £1'99.offiBrf--------- My appointment expires: ProJec1:Name:' •. l. Pazooki Townhouses Project Number: LUA04-061, SA-A, SHPL-A , City of Renton REPORT & Department of Planning / Bui/ding / Public Works DECISION ADMINISTRA TlVE SHORT PLA T & SITE PLAN LAND USE ACTION REPORT DA TE: September 20, 2004 cONCi:, Project Name: PazookiTownhouses DA~.'{ 1-,rOT ~ INITI fI: Owner: A3 Investments LLC. 1 ~ o,,JI ~\I'" ~v .m'll 110l{ Siavoosh Pazooki r NcvJ Mot 6100 South center Boulevard #250 f\ IVI. Ir,.. ~ I h. Tukwila, WA 98188 , Applicant/Contact: Omied Pazooki 3404 NE 6th Street Renton, Washington 98056 File Number: LUA-04-061, SA-A, SHPL-A, ECF Project Manager: NancyWeil Project Description: The applicant is proposing to divide the existing parcel at 972 Edmonds Avenue NE into two lots and develop a 6-unit multi-family in two buildings, with one tri-plex on each lot. The site is zoned Residential Multi-Family -Suburban Center (RM-C) with an existing single-family residence and detached garage, both structures p,roposed to be removed. The site is on the corner of Edmonds Avenue NE and NE 10 h Place, the access to the site is proposed off of Edmonds Avenue by a 24-foot wide shared driveway. The proposed multi-family structures are proposed to be 3-story with parking under the units. The proposed site improvements require Administrative Short Plat, Administrative Site Plan Review and Environmental (SEPAl Review. Project Location: 972 Edmonds Avenue NE Exisl. Bldg. Area gsf: 650 sq ft residence, Proposed New Bldgs. Area gs(: 5,124 square feet 484 sq ft detached Site Area: 13,503 square feet! Total Area for Each Lot: 6,751 square feet! 0.31 acres 0.16 acres 7.)--r~~ . f\ 'i1 ~l\'!i .. ,;r 1",17ili'" , .,~ ~ifft ~ ,..'-:~ Ii! ,~.I ~~ ,'!. ~~~ ~ 1-1':);' \:" "~, V"",o :+: ,I~'I'," I"''' I ~ ~ ~ iN. _, T""; ,.;;;:: :;;: ~ ~ ;.~~(;f 1~1 ~::J':I~N' ~ ·~:m[8r ;~ c-; , ,~~:~!,~, fl., \~~~ Project Location Map SPSHPLRPT REPORT & DECISION REPORT DATE: Project Name: Owner: Applicant/Contact: File Number: Project Manager: Project Description: Project Location: Exist. Bldg. Area gsf.· Site Area: Project Location Map City of Renton Department of Planning / Building / Public Works ADMINISTRA TIVE SHORT PLA T & SITE PLAN LAND USE ACTION September 21, 2004 PazookiTownhouses A3 Investments LLC. Siavoosh Pazooki 6100 Southcenter Boulevard #250 Tukwila, WA 98188 Omied Pazooki 3404 NE 6th Street Renton, Washington 98056 LUA-04-061, SA-A, SHPL-A, ECF NancyWeil The applicant is proposing to divide the existing parcel at 972 Edmonds Avenue NE into two lots and develop a 6-unit multi-family in two buildings, with one tri-plex on each lot. The site is zoned Residential Multi-Family -Suburban Center (RM-C) with an existing single-family residence and detached garage, both structures p,roposed to be removed. The site is on the corner of Edmonds Avenue NE and NE 10 h Place, the access to the site is proposed off of Edmonds Avenue by a 24-foot wide shared driveway. The proposed multi-family structures are proposed to be 3-story with parking under the units. The proposed site improvements require Administrative Short Plat, Administrative Site Plan Review and Environmental (SEPA) Review. 972 Edmonds Avenue NE 650 sq It residence, 484 sq It detached 13,503 sq ftI 0.31 acres King County Records 13,737 sq ftI 0.32 acres Survey Proposed New Bldgs. Area gsf: Total Area for Each Lot: 5,124 square feet 6,868.5 sq ftI 0.16 acres, per Survey SPSHPLRPT City of Renton PIBIPW Department PAZOOKI TOWNHOUSES Administrative Site PI< 1d Short Plat Approval Staff Report LUA-04-061, SA-A, SHPL-A, ECF REPORT AND DECISION OF SEPTEMBER 21. 2004 II PART ONE: BACKGROUND A. GENERAL INFORMA TlON: 1. Owners of Record: 2.Zoning Designation: A3 Investments LLC Siavoosh Pazooki 6100 Southcenter Blvd #250 Tukwila, WA 98188 Residential Multi-Family -Suburban Center (RM-C) 3. Comprehensive Plan Land Use Designation: Residential Multi-Family Infill Page 2 of 13 4.Existing Site Use: The site is currently developed with an existing 650 square foot single-family structure and 484 square foot detached garage. Both structures are proposed to be removed. 5. Neighborhood Characteristics: North: Residential Multi-Family -Suburban Center (RM-C) East: Residential Multi-Family -Suburban Center (RM-C) South: Residential Multi-Family -Suburban Center (RM-C) West: Residential Multi-Family -Infill (RM-I) 6.Access: 7. Site Area: Both Lot 1 and 2 would have a shared access from Edmonds Avenue NE. 13,737 square feet 1 0.32 acre B. HISTORICAUBACKGROUND: Action Comprehensive Plan Zoning Annexation C. PUBLIC SERVICES: 1. Utilities Land Use File No. NIA NIA NIA Ordinance No. 4498 4404 1827 Date 2/2011995 6/711993 5/3/1960 Water: There is an existing 2-inch and 16-inch diameter water line adjacent to the site in Edmonds Avenue NE. The project site is located in the 435-water pressure zone and static water pressure is approximately 70 psi. Sewer: There is an existing 8-inch diameter sanitary sewer main in the vacated portion of right-of-way of NE 10lh Place. Surface Water/Storm Water: There are existing surface water conveyance facilities along the frontage of this site in Edmonds Avenue NE. 2. Fire Protection: City of Renton Fire Department D. APPLICABLE SECTIONS OF THE RENTON MUNICIPAL CODE: 1. Chapter 2 Land Use Districts Section 4-2-020: Purpose and Intent of Zoning Districts Section 4-2-070: Zoning Use Table Section 4-2-110: Residential Development Standards 2. Chapter 4 Property Development Standards Section 4-4-030: Development Guidelines and Regulations 3. Chapter 6 Streets and Utility Standards Section 4-6-060: Street Standards 4. Chapter 7 Subdivision Regulations SPSHPLRPT Section 4-7-080: Detailed Procedures for Subdivision Section 4-7-120: Compatibility with Existing Land Use and Plan-General Requirements and Minimum Standards City of Renton PIB/PW Department PAZOOKITOWNHOUSES Administrative Site Pic ld Short Plat Approval Staff Report LUA-04-061, SA-A, SHPL-A, ECF REPORT AND DECISION OF SEPTEMBER 21, 2004 Page 3 of 13 Section 4-7-150: Streets-General Requirements and Minimum Standards Section 4-7-170: Residential Lots-General Requirements and Minimum Standards 5. Chapter 9 Procedures and Review Criteria E. APPLICABLE SECTIONS OF THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN: 1. Land Use Element -Residential Multi-Family 2. Housing Element II PART TWO: PROJECT DESCRIPTION/BACKGROUND The project is proposed to be located on the eastside of Edmonds Avenue NE, between an existing commercial development to the north, multi-family to the east and single-family residences to the south and west. The proposed two buildings would be three story town homes approximately 34 feet in height, each building with 3-units and enclosed parking. The project includes associated improvements, including the 2 garaged parking stalls per unit with a 24-foot wide access drive, landscaping along the perimeter of the site, and utilities. The proposal when completed would result in a 65% impervious surface area (approximately 38% building coverage). All stormwater runoff generated from the development would be collected and discharged into an approved storm drainage system. The applicant proposes to excavate a total of 250 cubic yards of soil to prepare the site for the two building pads. As indicated on the City maps, there are no critical areas located on this site. An unimproved public right of way, NE 10'h Place, abuts the site to the north, running from Edmonds Avenue NE approximately 130 feet, to the eastern point of the proposed site. At which point the remainder of the right of way was vacated on July 3,1967, Ordinance 2342. On August 3, 2004, a street modification was approved for required improvements along NE 10'h Place. Environmental (SEPA) approval was granted on July 20, 2004 with conditions. A. DEPARTMENT ANAL YSIS; 1. Type of Administrative Land Use Action XX Site Plan Review XX Short Plat Review Conditional Use Bindin Site Plan Special Permit for Grade & Fill Administrative Code Determination 2. Environmental Review Except when located on lands covered by water or critical areas, short plats are exempt from SEPA Environmental Review pursuant to WAC 197-11-800(6)(a). However, SEPA Environmental Review is required for projects with any residential structures of four dwelling units. Therefore, Environmental Review was conducted July 20, 2004 with the following conditions. 3. Compliance with ERC Mitigation Measures 1. The applicant shall be required to provide a Temporary ErOSion and Sedimentation Control Plan (TESCP) designed in accordance with the 2001 Department of Ecology Manual (DOE) and a Construction Mitigation Plan prior to issuance of Construction Permits. 2. The applicant shall pay the appropriate Fire Mitigation Fee based on a rate of $388.00 per new residential unit prior to the issuance of building permits or the recording of the short plat, whichever occurs first. 3. The applicant shall pay the appropriate Traffic Mitigation Fee based on a rate of $75.00 per new residential unit prior to the issuance of the building permits or the recording of the short plat, whichever occurs first. 4. The applicant shall pay the appropriate Parks Mitigation Fee based on a rate of $354.51 per new residential unit prior to the issuance of the building permits or the recording of the short plat, whichever occurs first. 4. Staff Review Comments Representatives from various city departments have reviewed the application materials to identify and address issues raised by the proposed development. These comments are contained in the official file, and the SPSHPLRPT City of Renton PIB/PW Department PAZOOKI TOWNHOUSES Administrative Site PI. ld Short Plat Approval Staff Report LUA-04-061, SA-A, SHPL-A, ECF REPORT AND DECISION OF SEPTEMBER 21, 2004 Page 4 of 13 essence of the comments has been incorporated into the appropriate sections of this report and the Departmental Recommendation at the end of the report. B, SHORT PLA T REVIEW; 1. Consistency Short Plat Criteria Approval of a short plat is based upon several factors. The following short plat criteria have been established to assist decision-makers in the review of the plat: a) Compliance with the Comprehensive Plan Designation The site is deSignated Residential Multi-Family (RMF) on the Comprehensive Plan Land Use Map. The RMF designation is intended to encourage the development of infill parcels in existing multi-family districts with compatible projects. The proposal is consistent with the RMF designation in that it would allow for the future construction of new multi-family homes, thereby promoting goals of infill development. The proposal is consistent with the following Comprehensive Plan Land Use policy: Policy LU-64. Net development densities should generally be in a range of 10 to 20 dwelling units per acre in Residential Multi-Family neighborhoods. The net density of the proposed 2-lot subdivision is 18.8 dwelling units per acre, which is within the density range prescribed. b) Compliance with the Underlying Zoning Designation The subject site is designated Residential Multi-Family -Suburban Center (RM-C) on the City of Renton Zoning Map. The proposed development would divide the property into two lots removing the existing single-family and detached structure and allow for the future construction of two new buildings, each with three townhouse dwellings. The allowed density range in the RM-C zone is a minimum of 10 to a maximum of 20 units per net acre. Net density is calculated after the deduction of environmentally sensitive areas, areas intended for public right-of-way and private drives serving three lots or more from the gross acreage of the site. The site does not contain any environmentally sensitive areas, areas required for right-of-way dedication or private drives serving three or more lots. Therefore, the proposal for two lot short plat would arrive at a new density of 18.8 dwelling units per acre for each lot (3 units!0.16 acres = 18.8), which is within the allowed density range for multi-family. It should be noted there is a discrepancy regarding the square footage of the site. According to the King County records the lot square footage is 13,737 or 0.32 acres. The applicant has shown the lot square footage to be 13,737 or 0.32 acres. The City of Renton Property Services has noted (July 12, 2004 Memo) this discrepancy to be resolved prior to the recording of the short plat. Based on either lot square footage the proposed project would comply with the development requirements for the RM-C zoning, however for conSistency this report is based on the applicant's 13,737 square footage. The allowed lot dimensions allowed in RM-C is minimum width of 50 feet and minimum depth of 65 feet. The Residential Multi-Family zone does not require a minimum lot size. The lot dimensions of each proposed lot meet the minimum requirements as shown in the following chart: Property lines WesU front North! side EasU rear South! side Lot Square footage Lot 1 52.5 130.77 52.5 130.83 6868.5 Lot 2 52.5 130.83 52.5 130.89 6868.5 The setback requirements for RM-C is minimum front yard of 20 feet; minimum side yard is based on lot width, for 50.1 to 60 feet lot width requires side setback of 6 feet; and minimum rear yard of 15 feet. The maximum building height and number of stories is 35 feeU 3 stories. The RM-C zone allows maximum building coverage of 45% and maximum impervious surface area of 75%. As proposed the project meets these requirements. c) Community Assets SPSHPLRPT The site is currently developed with two structures, which are vacant and to be removed. There is little vegetation existing on this relatively flat site. The revised landscape plan the applicant has proposed is City of Renton P/B/PW Deparlment PAZOOKI TOWNHOUSES Administrative Site PI[ ld Shorl Plat Approval Staff RepDrl LUA-04-061, SA-A, SHPL-A, ECF REPORT AND DECISION OF SEPTEMBER 21. 2004 Page 5 of 13 sufficient to meet development requirements and provides adequate screening to adjacent residential properties. The proposed placement and volume of plantings shown along Edmonds Avenue frontage has been enhanced to provide a denser, more aesthetically pleasing landscape. The code requires all the setback areas to be landscaped, providing a planting buffer to adjacent properties; the revised landscape plan achieves this requirement. The groundcover has been identified to be grass lawn and a mixture of trees and shrubs has been incorporated into the landscape plan. An irrigation system has been included in the proposed plan. d) Compliance with Subdivision Regulations Streets: No new public streets would be created as part of the proposed short plat. The proposed subdivision is anticipated to generate additional traffic on the City's street system. As a condition of the Environmental (SEPA) approval on July 20, 2004, in order to mitigate transportation impacts, a Transportation Mitigation Fee based on $75.00 per Average Daily Trip was attributed to the project. The fee for the proposed development is estimated at $2.306.25 (according to the 7'h Addition of the ITE Trip Generation Manual) and is payable at the time of building permit. Blocks: No new blocks will be created as part of the proposed short plat. Lots: The proposed division would create two lots with the property lines at right angles to street lines, both lots are dimensioned approximately 52.5 x 130.83. The west property line of both lots is the front yard thus the east property line is the rear yard; accordingly the north and south property lines are the side yards. For exact lot dimensions please reference chart under subsection b) Compliance with the Underlying Zoning Designation. The proposed lots have public street frontage on Edmonds Avenue NE. The two lots will be accessed by a shared 24-foot wide private easement off of Edmonds Avenue NE. As discussed, the size, shape, orientation, and arrangement of the proposed lots comply with the requirements of the Subdivision Regulations and the development standards of the Residential Multi- Family -Suburban Center (RM-C) zone. e) Reasonableness of Proposed Boundaries Access: Access to the proposed 2-lots will be via a shared private 24-foot wide access easement off of Edmonds Avenue NE. Topography: The topography of the site is generally flat with a slight downward slope from the east to the west. Along the east property line, shown to be located on the adjacent property is an existing wall. Another wall is shown along the front portion of the southern property line and appears to be on the adjacent property however is connected to a chain link fence running along the remainder of that property line. The proposal does not indicate any impact to these structures. The property is sparsely vegetated with one pine tree at the southwest corner to be removed. Relationship to Existing Uses: The properties surrounding the subject site are designated Residential Multi-Family (RM) on the City's zoning map, suffix Suburban Center (RM-C) to the north, east and south and suffix Infill (RM-I) to across Edmonds Avenue NE to the west. A mix of multi-family and single-family residences currently exists in this area. Apartment buildings on sites less than one acre are adjacent to the subject site to the east, southeast and southwest. To the north of the subject site is a vacant lot and a church use. The single-family residences are an existing use in the Residential Multi-family zone, located directly to the south, northeast and across Edmonds Avenue NE and are generally on less than half-acre lots .. The proposed townhouses are compatible to existing development patterns in the area and is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan and Zoning Code, which encourage residential infill development. f) Availability and Impact on Public Services (Timeliness) SPSHPLRPT Police and Fire: Police and Fire Prevention staff indicate that sufficient resources exist to furnish services to the proposed development, subject to the applicant providing the Code required improvements and mitigation fees. A Fire Mitigation Fee, based on $388.00 per new unit, was required during environmental review in order to mitigate the proposal's potential impacts to City emergency services. The fee is estimated at $388.00 ($388 x 6 = $2,328.00) and is payable prior to the recording of the short plat. City of Renton PIB/PW Department PAZOOKI TOWNHOUSES Administrative Site PI, ld Short Plat Approval Staff Report WA-04-061, SA-A, SHPL-A, ECF REPORT AND DECISION OF SEPTEMBER 21, 2004 Page 6 of 13 Schools: According to the Draft Environmental Impact Statement for the City of Renton Land Use Element (January 16, 1992), the City of Renton has a student generation factor of 0.33 students per unit for multi-family residential development. Therefore, it is anticipated that the proposed short plat would result in 1.98 (0.33 X 6 = 1.98) new children to the local schools (Highland Elementary School, McKnight Middle School, and Hazen High School). The Renton School District has indicated they can accommodate the additional student generated by this proposal. Streets: The subject site is located to the east of Edmonds Avenue NE and south of NE 10th Place. Neither street frontage is improved with sidewalk, curb, and gutter. A storm drainage facility is located Edmonds Avenue NE which is an improved surface. Currently, NE 10th Place is unimproved. However, a street modification was granted on August 3, 2004 to the proposed property with conditions as follows: 1. If not currently existing, 20-feet minimum width of pavement (not including the required walkway) shall be provided for the full frontage along NE 10th Place. This is subject to verification, and if needed, installation prior to occupancy of any unit. 2. In any location where there is less than 28 feet of pavement, "No Parking" signage shall be installed on both sides of the right-of-way prior to occupancy of any unit. 3. A five foot wide pedestrian walk way shall be constructed and delineated along the south side of NE 10th Place to the satisfaction of the Development Services Division Prior to occupancy of any unit. No additional streets are required as part of this proposal. Nevertheless, the applicant would be required to pay a Traffic Mitigation Fee in the amount of $75.00 per each new trip generated by the proposal prior to the recording of the short plat. Storm Water: Storm water facilities are located in Edmonds Avenue NE. A drainage narrative is required to be submitted prior to recording of the short plat. A Surface Water System Development Charge of $0.249 per new impervious area ($0.249 x 8,350 sq. ft. = $2,076.66) would be collected as part of the construction permit or prior to the recording of the short plat. Water and Sanitary Sewer Utilities: The site is located in the 435-water pressure zone with existing 2-inch and 16-inch water lines and 8-inch sanitary sewer main located adjacent to the site. The applicant would be required to replace the 2-inch water main with a 1O-inch and the new fire hydrants and water meters may be connected to this line. A Water System Development Charge for multi-family development is $915.00 per dwelling units ($915.00 x 5 units = $4,575.00) one unit credit of water charges is given for existing dwelling on site. A Sewer System Development Charge of $540.00 per new dwelling unit ($540.00 x 6 units = $3,240.00). These fees would be collected as part of the construction permit or prior to the recording of the short plat. C. SITE PLAN REVIEW; 1. Exhibits The following exhibits were entered into the record: Exhibit NO.1: Project (yellow) file containing: application, proof of posting and publication, environmental Exhibit No.2: Exhibit NO.3: Exhibit NO.4: Exhibit NO.5: Exhibit NO.6: Exhibit NO.7: Exhibit NO.8: review and other documentation pertinent to this request. Site Vicinity Map Drawing No. SP1 Short Plat (Received June 10, 2004). Drawing No. A1, Site Plan (Received June 10,2004). Drawing No. Sheet 4 & 5, Elevations (Received June 10, 2004). Drawing No. Sheet PPL Landscape Plan -Revised (Received August 24,2004). E4E, City of Renton Zoning Map Book City of Renton Street Modification Letter, dated August 3, 2004. 2. Consistency with Site Plan Criteria In reviewing the proposal for compliance with the Site Plan Approval Criteria set forth in Section 4-9-200 of the Site Plan Ordinance, the following issues were identified by City Departmental Reviewers and Divisional Reviewers: a) Compliance with the Comprehensive Plan, its elements and policies SPSHPLRPT City of Renton PIBIPW Department PAZOOKI TOWNHOUSES Administrative Site Plr 1d Short Plat Approval Staff Report WA-04-061, SA-A, SHPL-A, ECF REPORT AND DECISION OF SEPTEMBER 21, 2004 Page 7 of 13 The subject site is designated Residential Multi-family Suburban Center (RM-C) on the City's Comprehensive Plan Land Use Map. The intent of the RM-C designation is to provide for and protect suitable environments for multi-family dwellings. The RM-C zone is intended to allow for the development of higher-density residential on parcels in existing multi-family districts with compatible projects, The allowed density range is from ten (10) to twenty (20) dwelling units per acre. The proposal is consistent with the following Comprehensive Plan Land Use policy: Policy LU-66. Design standards should be applied that reflect present development patterns and are sensitive to unique features and differences among established neighborhoods. Standards should address, but not be limited to: 1) building height, width, and length; 2) front, side, and rear yard setbacks; 3) maximum lot coverage; 4) location of driveways, garages and parking areas; 5) number of garages and off-site parking spaces; 6) roofline; and 7) compatibility with adjacent uses. The applicant is proposing to construct a 6-unit multi-family project similar to existing multi-family projects in the vicinity. The applicant has proposed to construct two townhouse style buildings with three units in each building. The two proposed new buildings appear to be compatible in scale and character with those in the area. Proposed building heights comply with the 35-foot height limitation and the exterior appearance of the structures is similar to other existing multi-family projects in the area, The buildings have hipped roofs, modulation on the garage entry side of the buildings, and protruding bay windows on the rear and side elevations. Each unit would have a garage door entry and front door on the ground floor. b) Conformance with existing land use regulations SPSHPLRPT The subject site is located in the Residential Multi-Family Suburban Center (RM-C) zoning designation. The purpose of the RM-C zone is to provide suitable environments for multi-family development and intended to support nearby commercial centers. Attached dwelling units are permitted in the RM-C zone. Compliance of the proposal with the applicable development standards of the RM-C zone is discussed below: Density -The allowed density range in the RM-C zone ranges from a minimum of 10 units to a maximum of 20 units per net acre. Please see above Short Plat Review section B, subsection b) Compliance with Underlying Zoning. Setbacks -The RM-C zone requires a minimum front yard setback of 20 feet and a minimum rear yard setback of 15 feet. A minimum side yard setback of 6-feet (for lots between 50,1 and 60 feet in width) plus one-foot for each story in height over two (7-feet for a three story structure). The proposed buildings have been situated to maintain a 20-foot front yard setback abutting Edmonds Avenue NE and a 7-foot setback from the north and south property lines. The proposed rear (east) yard setback exceeds the required 15 feet. As proposed, the buildings comply with the minimum setback requirements. The elevations plans show proposed 20d floor bay windows projecting into the required front yard setback. The plans appear to comply with the allowed 2-foot projections into setback limited to 2 per facade not wider than 10-feet. The building plans and site plan will be reviewed for compliance with all required setbacks at the time of building permit submittal. Building Height -The maximum building height permitted in the RM-C zone is 35-feet with a maximum of three stories. Based on the building elevations submitted, the proposed buildings are three-story structures and will be required to meet all building code requirements for three story structures. The proposed buildings are approximately 34 feet tall, which is in compliance with the prescribed height requirements. Lot Coverage -The RM-C zone allows a maximum building coverage of 45 percent of the site area and a maximum impervious surface coverage of 75 percent of the site. The site is currently developed with two structures (residence and accessory structure) that the applicant proposes to demolish. The footprint of the two new buildings is proposed to total approximately 5,124 square feet and would result in building coverage of 37 percent (5,124/13,737 = 37%), which is below the maximum allowed within this zoning designation. The proposed impervious surface area will result in approximately 59 percent of the site being covered (8,124 sq. ft. of impervious surface after project completion 113,737 gross sq. ft. = 59%), which is below the maximum allowed within the RM-C zoning designation. Landscaping -Developments in the RM-C zone must provide landscaping in all required setbacks unless otherwise modified through the site plan review process. The applicant is proposing to provide City of Renton PIBIPW Department PAZOOKI TOWNHOUSES Administrative Site PIE ld Short Plat Approval Staff Report LUA-04-061, SA-A, SHPL-A, ECF REPORT AND DECISION OF SEPTEMBER 21. 2004 Page 8 of 13 a landscaping strip around the perimeter of the subject site consisting of a mixture of shrubs and trees. In addition, the landscape plan shows plantings along the west and east facades of the buildings with grass lawn area. The applicant has proposed to install a mixture of 3-inch caliper unspecified conifers, 10 to 12 foot high vine maples (Acer circinatum), shrubs and a variety of rhododendron, azalea and sweet box (Sarcococca ruscifolia). Additional landscaping is shown along both sides of the access road leading into the project as well as along the west and east end of the buildings. The proposed landscaping is adequate for enhancement of the site and the structures while providing an effective buffer to adjoining properties. The site will be irrigated and maintained. Refuse and Recyclables: All new multi-family developments are required to provide on-site refuse and recyclables deposit areas and collection points. Outdoor refuse and recyclables deposit areas are not permitted within required setback or landscape areas, and may not be located within fifty feet of a residentially zoned property. unless approved through the Site Plan Review process. A minimum of 1 Y, square feet per dwelling unit must be provided for recyclables deposit and a minimum of 3 square feet for refuse deposit. Therefore the proposed 6-unit development would require a 27 square foot refuse and recyclables deposit area. Waste Management must approve the deposit area location on the site. The applicant is responsible for contacting Waste Management. The deposit area must be screened with a 6-foot wall or fence enclosure. The applicant did not propose a location for refuse and recyclables deposit on the site plan. Due to the limited width of the site. it will not be possible for the applicant to locate the refuse and recyclables deposit area fifty feet away from the surrounding residential properties. The applicant should endeavor to place the deposit area as far from surrounding residential properties as feasible. Staff recommends as a condition of approval that the applicant be required to submit and receive approval of a revised site plan indicating the proposed size and location of the refuse and recyclables deposit area, as well as proposed screening. The revised site plan to reflect location of the refuse and recyclables area is to be submitted for review by Development Services staff prior to the approval and issuance of the building permit. Parking -Based on the City's parking regulations, multi-family projects within the RM-C zone where tandem parking is not provided, 2 parking stalls per each unit is required. The 6-unit multi-family development requires 12 parking stalls (6 x 2 = 12 stalls). As such, the applicant has proposed ground level garage parking under each unit. 2 per unit. No guest parking stalls are proposed or required by code however on -street parking adjacent to the site is available. Each garage provides two standard (9 feet wide x 20 feet long) parking stalls. The Renton Municipal Code allows a maximum of 30 percent of proposed parking stalls to be compact parking stalls. Due to the location of the access driveway and the building setback requirements, the area available for parking is limited. In order to insure that adequate area is available for Emergency vehicles, staff recommends as a condition of approval that the applicant be required to post "No Parking" signs along the 24-foot wide access easement and designate the easement as a "Fire Lane". The applicant is responsible for providing information to reflect the location of signs and show compliance with this conditions to the Development Services staff prior to the approval and issuance of the building permit. c) Mitigation of impacts to surrounding properties and uses SPSHPLRPT The subject site is currently developed with one single-family residence and a detached accessory structure that are proposed to be demolished. Upon project completion, the proposal would be two 3- story structures; each structure containing 3 ground-related town home units with under unit garages. The site is required to provide landscaping in the required yard setback areas. The proposal would enhance the site by creating a cohesive landscaping plan that would include a combination of ornamental trees, shrubs and groundcover. Landscaping is proposed along Edmonds Avenue NE, the subject site's northern border with NE 10'h Place, and the southern and eastern boundaries. The access easement to the property in located in the middle of the site and should have little impact on the adjacent properties. It should be noted that the subject site is abutting a similar multi-family use to the east, which gains access from unimproved NE10th Place. The proposed structures are appropriate in scale to adjacent existing structures to the north and east. The required parking is provided on the ground level of each unit, in enclosed garages. As proposed and conditioned. staff does not anticipate the proposal to adversely impact the surrounding properties. City of Renton PIB/PW Department PAZOOKI TOWNHOUSES Administrative Site PI, ld Short Plat Approval Staff Report LUA-04-061, SA-A, SHPL-A, ECF REPORT AND DECISION OF SEPTEMBER 21, 2004 Page 9 of 13 The proposed buildings are to be constructed of Hardi Plank finish with accents of wood shingle siding and cultured stone foundation. Bay windows and building staggering are proposed to enhance the design of the elevation. The two structures are oriented to face inward to the sight and drive way courtyard. d) Mitigation of impacts of the proposed site plan to the site The proposal is not expected to adversely impact the site. Construction activities would be required to utilize best management practices that would reduce potential construction impacts to the site. As indicated in the construction mitigation plan submitted by the applicant, erosion control measures would be implemented as part of the project. The site is relatively flat with little existing vegetation other then brush. The revised landscaping plan provides landscaped areas along the public right-of-way frontages, access road and the adjacent properties to the south side property line and east rear property line. The building placement on each lot is such that the two structures create an inward facing courtyard for the private driveway and individual entrances to the townhomes and garages. The project is under the maximum allowed setbacks, building and impervious surface coverage. The applicant is providing additional areas of landscaping to enhance the entrance into the development. The proposed material and architectural features of the buildings provide variation and texture to the structures. Windows including bay windows are proposed on all sides of the both structures and with approximately 24-foot separation between the two buildings allowing light and air penetration. e) Conservation of area-wide property values The proposal would allow for the development of a new 6-unit townhome residential project that would serve area residents. The project is anticipated to conserve or enhance area-wide property values in the neighboring vicinity, as the site would be developed with a new multi-family development expected to bear current market value. f) Safety and efficiency of vehicle and pedestrian circulation The applicant has proposed one 24-foot wide access driveway connected to Edmonds Avenue NE, which will minimize the interruption of pedestrian sidewalks for driveways along Edmonds Avenue NE. The site and proposed driveway has very little slope. Staff recommends as a condition of approval that the applicant be required to post the access drive as "Fire Lane" and "No Parking" area in order to ensure Emergency vehicle access. Each unit has individual ground level entry as well as entry through a two-car garage under each unit for residence parking. On-street parking is available along NE Edmonds Avenue. g) Provision of adequate light and air Each unit within the development is proposed to be three stories with a first floor garage and will contain a ground level entry. The buildings have been designed to provide windows facing both north and south for center units in order to ensure adequate light and air circulation throughout the structures. The building orientation ensures that ample sunlight and wind can flow through the site in any direction depending on the time of the day and the direction of the prevailing wind. Finally, the buildings are proposed to approximately 34 feet tall and are not expected to cast expansive shadows, light or glare on adjacent or abutting properties. The applicant did not indicate proposed lighting for the driveway and building entrances. In order to minimize the impact onto adjacent and abutting properties, staff recommends as a condition of approval that the applicant be required to indicated proposed lighting on the site plan and provide a standard lighting detail, in compliance with RMC 4-4- 075, prior to building permit issuance. h) Mitigation of noise, odors and other harmful or unhealthy conditions SPSHPLRPT The proposed multi-family development is not expected to create any harmful or unhealthy conditions. The trash/recycling facilities will be required to be located in a manner that limits odor impacts to neighboring properties. Furthermore, as the subject site is bordered on the east by another multi- family use and other multi-family uses exist in the vicinity, staff does not anticipate a significant or detrimental increase in noise and/or odor impacts from the proposed development. City of Renton PIB/PW Department PAZOOKI TOWNHOUSES Administrative Site PI, ld Short Plat Approval Staff Report WA-04-061, SA-A, SHPL-A, ECF REPORT AND DECISION OF SEPTEMBER 21. 2004 Page 100113 Short-term noise, dust and odor may result from the temporary construction of the proposed development. However, staff fully expects those impacts to be mitigated by the applicant's construction mitigation plan and the requirements of the Renton Municipal Code. i) Availability of public services and facilities to accommodate the proposed use The City of Renton serves this site with water, sewer, and storm water facilities. A 2-inch and 16-inch water line exists adjacent to the site and an existing 8-inch sewer main in vacant NE 10th Place. The existing 2-inch water mains along NE 10th Place will be required to be replaced with a 1O-inch watermain for the new Fire Hydrants and water meters to connect to. All existing hydrants serving the buildings will be required to be retrofitted with Storz "quick disconnect" fittings. The Renton Police and Fire departments have indicated that they have adequate resources to support the proposed project. j) Prevention of neighborhood deterioration and blight xx The 6-unit townhome development would enhance a site currently developed with a single-family residence and detached structure in poor condition. The surrounding properties are zoned for multi- family with an existing multi-family development adjacent to the east. The development includes two new townhouse buildings with 3 units each, 2 parking stall garage under each unit and associated utilities and landscaping improvements. Staff does not anticipate neighborhood deterioration or blight to occur as a result of this proposal. Co ies of all Review Comments are contained in the Official File. Copies of all Review Comments are attached to this report. D. FINDINGS: Having reviewed the written record in the matter, the City now enters the following: 1) Request: The Applicant has requested Environmental (SEPA) Review, Administrative Site Plan and Short Plat Approval for the Pazooki Townhouses, a 6-unit multi-family development, Project No. LUA- 04-061, SA-A, SHPL-A, ECF. 2) 3) 4) 5) 6) 7) Environmental Review: The applicant's file containing the application, State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA) documentation, the comments from various City departments, the public notices requesting citizen comment, and other pertinent documents was entered as Exhibit No.1. Site Plan/Short Plat Review: The applicant's site plan and short plat application complies with the requirements for information for site plan and short plat review, provided all advisory notes and conditions of approval are complied with. The applicant's site plan, short plat and other project drawings are entered as Exhibits No.2 through 6. Comprehensive Plan: The subject proposal is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan designation of Residential Multi-Family-Suburban Center (RM-C), provided all advisory notes and conditions of approval are complied with. Zoning: The Site Plan and Short Plat as presented, complies with the zoning requirements and development standards of the Residential Multi-Family-Suburban Center (RM-C) zone, provided all advisory notes and conditions of approval are complied with. Existing Land Use: Land uses surrounding the subject site include: North: Vacant lot and church property, zoned Multi-Family-Suburban Center (RM-C); East: Multi-family apartment building and a single-family residence, zoned Multi-Family-Suburban Center (RM-C); South: Single-family residence, zoned Multi-Family-Suburban Center (RM-C); West: Edmonds Avenue NE, public right of way then single-family residence, zoned Multi-family Infill property (RM-I). Street Modification Approval: A street modification was approved August 3, 2004 for street required improvements along NE 10th Place. E. CONCLUSIONS: 1) The subject proposal generally complies with the policies and codes of the City of Renton. SPSHPLRPT Compliance would be achieved, provided all advisory notes and conditions of approval are complied with. City of Renton P/B/PW Department PAZOOKI TOWNHOUSES REPORT AND DECISION OF SEPTEMBER 21, 2004 Administrative Site PI 1d Short Plat Approval Staff Report LUA-04-061, SA-A, SHPL-A, ECF Page 11 of 13 2) The proposal complies with the Comprehensive Plan designation of Residential Multi-Family- Suburban Center (RM-C); and the Zoning designation of Residential Multi-Family-Suburban Center (RM-C), provided all advisory notes and conditions of approval are complied with. 3) Environmental (SEPA) review was conducted on the site in conjunction with the Site Plan Review application. Four mitigation measures were imposed. 4) The proposed use (multi-family) is similar to other existing uses located near the subject site and appropriate measures and conditions have been recommended to mitigate the impact of the proposal on the single-family residence to the south. 5) Water System Development Charges in the amount of $915.00 per new unit, Sewer System Development Charges in the amount of $540.00 per unit, and Surface Water System Development Charges in the amount of $0.249/sq.ft. of new impervious area apply. These fees are payable with the construction permit. Redevelopment credits may apply. F. DECISION: The Site Plan and Short Plat for the PazookiTownhouses, File No. LUA-04-061, SA-A, SHPL-A, ECF are approved subject to the following conditions: 1. The applicant shall post "Fire Lane" and "No Parking" signs along the 24-foot access drive. Applicant shall provide information to the Development Services staff to verify this requirement has been complied with prior to the recording of the short plat. 2. The applicant shall be required to submit and receive approval of a revised site plan indicating the proposed size and location of the refuse and recyclables deposit area, as well as proposed screening. A revised site plan to reflect location of the refuse and recyclables area is to be submitted for the review by Development Services staff prior to the approval and issuance of the building permit. 3. The applicant shall be required to indicated proposed lighting on the site plan and provide a standard lighting detail, in compliance with RMC 4-4-075, to be submitted for the review by Development Services staff prior to the approval and issuance of the building permit. EFFECTIVE DATE OF DECISION ON LAND USE ACTION: SIGNATURE: ing/Building/Public Works Director TRANSMITTED September 21, 2004 to the owner/applicant: A3 Investments LLC. Siavoosh Pazooki 6100 Southcenter Boulevard #250 Tukwila, WA 98188 TRANSMITTED September 21,2004 to the contact: Omied Pazooki 3404 NE 6th Street Renton, WA 98004 TRANSMITTED September 21, 2004 to the party of record: Laurance Anthone, CEO MA Quik Framing Inc. 6000 South Center Boulevard #20 Tukwila, WA 98188 SPSHPLRPT q/l.oJa 'f r I Date City of Renton PIBIPW Department PAZOOKI TOWNHOUSES Administrative Site PI, 1d Short Plat Approval Staff Report LUA-04-061, SA-A, SHPL-A, ECF REPORT AND DECISION OF SEPTEMBER 21, 2004 TRANSMITTED September 21,2004 to the following: Jennifer Henning, DevelopmenUPlanning Larry Meckling, Building Official Stan Englar, Fire Prevention Kayren Kittrick, Public Works Division Lawrence J. Warren, City Attorney South County Journal Page 120f13 Land Use Decision Appeal Process Appeals of the land use decision must be filed in writing on or before 5:00 PM October 5, 2004, If no appeals are filed by this date, the action will become final. Appeals must be filed in writing together with the required $75.00 application fee with: Hearing Examiner, City of Renton, 1055 South Grady Way, Renton, WA 98055. Appeals to the Examiner are governed by City of Renton Municipal Code Section 4- 8-110. Additional information regarding the appeal process may be obtained from the Renton City Clerk's Office, (425) 430-6510. Advisory Notes to Applicant: The following notes are supplemental Information provided In conjunction with the administrative land use action, Because these notes are provided as information only, they are not subject to the appeal process for the land use actions, Planning 1, RMC section 4-4-030.C.2 limits haul hours between 8:30 am to 3:30 pm, Monday through Friday unless otherwise approved by the Development Services Division. The Development Services Division reserves the right to rescind the approved extended haul hours at any time if complaints are received. 2. Within thirty (30) days of completion of grading work, the applicant shall hydro seed or plant an appropriate ground cover over any portion of the site that is graded or cleared of vegetation and where no further construction work will occur within ninety (90) days. Alternative measures such as mulch, sodding, or plastic covering as specified in the current King County Surface Water Management Design Manual as adopted by the City of Renton may be proposed between the dates of November 1st and March 31st of each year. The Development Services Division's approval of this work is required prior to final inspection and approval of the occupancy permit. 3. Commercial, multi-family, new single-family and other nonresidential construction activities shall be restricted to the hours between seven o'clock (7:00) am and eight o'clock (8:00) pm, Monday through Friday. Work on Saturdays shall be restricted to the hours between nine o'clock (9:00) am and eight o'clock (8:00) pm, No work shall be permitted on Sundays. 4. All landscaping shall be irrigated by an approved irrigation system prior to final occupancy permits Fire Prevention 1. The preliminary fire flow is 2,250 gpm, one hydrant is required within 150 feet of the structures and two additional hydrants are required within 300 feet of the structures. 2, Separate plans and permits are required for the installation of sprinkler and fire alarm systems, 3, Fire department access roads are required to be 20 feet in width and paved. 4, Street address shall be visible from the public street. Building 1. Demolition permits are required for the existing structures on site, 2. Any retaining walls greater than 4 feet in height will need to be reviewed under separate Building permits. A licensed engineer with geo-technical expertise must be retained for proposed rockeries greater than four feet in height. The engineer must monitor rockery construction and verify in writing that the rockery was constructed in general accordance with ARC standards and with his/her supplemental recommendations, Property Services -Comments for Final Short Plat Submittal 1. Please see attached memo from Property Services dated July 12, 2004. Plan Review -Water 1. City Code requires a System Development Charge (SOC) for all new and re-development. The fee for this multi- family development is $915.00 per dwelling unit (5-new units X $915 = $4,575.00), 2, The existing 2" water main along NE 10th Place will be required to be replaced with a 10" watermain. New Hydrant(s) and watermeters may be connected to this line, 3. Any existing sub-standard fire hydrants will be required to be upgraded and/or retrofitted with a quick disconnect Storz fitting. 4. If a fire sprinkler system is required, a separate utility permit and separate plans will be required for the installation of the double detector check valve assembly. 5, Due to the single-family nature of the dwelling units, it is highly recommended that the developer install individual water meters to each unit. SPSHPLRPT City of Renton PIBlPW Department PAZOOKI TOWNHOUSES Administrative Site PIr ld Short Plat Approval Staff Report LUA-04-061, SA-A, SHPL-A, ECF REPORT AND DECISION OF SEPTEMBER 2t, 2004 Page 13 of 13 Plan Review -Sanitary Sewer 1. City Code requires a System Development Charge (SDC) for any new development. The fee for this development is $540.00 per dwelling unit (6 new units x 540.00 = $3,240.00). 2. New side-sewer stub-outs are required for each new lot. Plan Review -Surface Water 1. Surface water System Development Charge (SDC) is required for this site. This fee is $0.249 new impervious area ($0.249 X 8,350 sq ft = $2.076.66). 2. A storm and surface water drainage plan and report (per the 1990 King County Surface Water Manual; see the seven Core requirements) are required. The Technical Information Report analysis submitted with this application has covered all of the Core requirements. Plan Review -Transportation 1. A street modification was granted August 3.2004 regarding required street improvements along NE 10th Place. See conditions of approval in attached letter. Plan Review -General 1. Install new watermain along the frontage of NE 10th Place. 2. Install new Fire Hydrants in accordance with Fire Flow requirements. 3. All new or existing fire hydrants (specifically required for the development) must be fitted with a quick disconnect Storz fitting. 4. Provide a separate side sewer stub-out connection to each new building lot. Show easement for sidesewer crossing new north lot on the Short Plat Document. 5. Provide a separate water meter connection for each new building lot (note: it is recommended that each unit have it's own individual water meter). 6. Prior to any construction activities on the site. Temporary Erosion and Sedimentation Control (TESC) shall be installed and maintained to the satisfaction of the representative of the Development Services Division for the duration of the project. SPSHPLRPT RENTON A TLAS OF SEATTLE cop,,,,(,><rED ~ PVIlLIS><£D BY KROLL MAP COMPANY, INC., SEATTLE SCALE I INO' -200 '"En L--Se :0 m (") m <: m C C n < <-On c ~~ :z 0:1 -nn "'" = m- "" ~' = O~ = ....-Z~ ~ " G CJ 2 Z2 20 ...-~!z = = '" !zit! = Wu.. -::;;0 :z i5~ ::> ...J--, wU > w 0 r;--,c,' .. ----. -_. Ii: I I T • ~" jl a... « ~ ~ ..J a... b: 0 I CJ) >-c: « l'i1 ,; Z ~ I : I ..J I W I c: I; a... I, I' I: t >1m l.\ ....... ,,-..' .. " ...... _._. _._~ .""'m, •. ~ __ .n~ ........... < • 5 i J. ~ r--._-: I I I I I • , a • • ~ I o . J i ! ! ' • • ! ! " , , . ~o < ~ ~! ~ I i, , ~o I . I" I 51 ~ a ,; a. ~I ow~l~ 1!I~i . r I ! i , iii!, ; I, i ~ III a -ar~ i ,;,' I I! I I!l,! ! ; ;:!;~l~iiq Ie/ !ilbj j ! ~, aUi~'1 I !!i 1 iii ! Ih;i; i I I.' I'. ~ n~:~i ~ -_. _ .. ----. - - - - . ---.tJ,,- , . , I " " ., w z , ~I _. I (!) z Zz zo .... ~!z = ~ >-w za: = wu. :;:0 ;z iS~ => W -l--, wO a: > w 0 ~ "0 -~-~~'iI w"-o > ~ ~ ~ , o i .. i o ! . , ! ~1 "i" _. bl Irb~ ill'l . , . il'!' ! ~-~ Iii;! i ii11b . 1 .. 1, j ! II;:!! i ...... , ,,,,.,,,,. I • ~ ~! i ! . II' I ~ -;:: ~ -, ~~~§§~!~! !· ... 111Iil i,ii . , In· , mill f: . ,,11 ,I lidl l I cfi=~="-'i : I I I ! ' i • 1-, . . ~ ~ ~l (j ~ i ~ ~! ~ ~ I i I n; ~\ I nnU 51 I , UH!!! ! ! ~ 1111 .~. Q ~ .'. ~ ~ "(,; i 1tlIU 1' I, ... -.. "r-' ---4,-I " ' ~I wi z ~I 1·--1 ,.",:.. f·~?:'q;!·-F 9 \.:" ··~:·I~-· -=r-1J~'~;':::"'.-.-.,,::,;.~J l .. -::.~,~ ~-=-: .. ~_-_~-~ o;::;\,) 3N 3A11 SONnn03 i ~ --'~:::p'- -............ , -... -...... r.:.:.,--... ---.. --------.. --.......... -...... -~ .. ··•· .. r---.. · .... -.. " ..... ~--j -.. _ .. L .. _ ~I i q , -._-----"_ .. _-. '_ .. -.. __ .. - 99L96 '1M '\fl\M)I()l GII""l8 1:13.J.N3:>HJ1IClS 001.9 SlN3VUS3NII C'tf :-.!O.L.~:~ll A.O }"LIJ ... _ .. -l ___ _ :D m (") m <.: m c '-C Z -= ~ UlI< 0:", () <-r! I » rn :1 I "Ul ' nll ,'" .• ,~I I " I rn II ,l' :::::: r II I~I .lo> rn II I~ ~ < Ii I" II :J:'; II Iii _~1111 1-0 II I j Qz 11,' II I I ~~::II 0" (j)" . II _" o ~ Om _r-:;!~ 0;:: "m fi1~ ~"U oS;; ZZ Z Z Gl .;: . ~rIF~~:~ '.~.:~ ,_,:~u.: ~-,~,,~. :~Ir: ~E il,~ ;~ e, ",' ,,<.I" 'lJ ~,;~~ 1i ~ :j~ '::-<: ~~ I~ :f. ~ ! I~ ~ i 0 N~5.~f? ~HMADNIA _ EDMUNDS AVE NE s ~ ','V... :v",j. ;3... ( ,~ '" IN ,. ii i II r'v (j) (j) "' nO ~ ~'c ;;I~~§;;d -{ ~:-\ II~ " ~ I , '~ U· ;:r lt~~E~~!m~~il~~ c, ':::::.rn " ." .lo>:r " 0; '" rn :: :; II < !, .~ »" . -::-1 ;.-'", ; : QO . ~ : I!~DDDIB OJ "~,.,n,., ~ r o (j) -'I!UlUUU"M r""U-H-H'" hoi ,: ;i! Ii ~ !i ·....,·1 -,1.','1 ., o if :~~~~i~f: '-~ -_ . .! . I DDDf"~ ~ : I I, ,~ ;,.--,----,--,-.1 IrT"'i""I'9l I! ""'f""'I'-U' F' , if, . I i f.~ j: W ., " i~ Ie I :!:'f :'i I ~ I, I.i ~, I~ i"; ~~ I; ~ I' I'. 2~ ,I~ " 11 ;;~ ,~ I", .f,~ I~ I} • ;~ :1 " " 34·10" -SHEET TITLE °" .. 1 BLDG. I S. W ELEV. ,.,! ~, ;'1 81 " , , Am d • N I '90lQ 1 , ; : , ! l • ~~ , .1 ! II ~I ;, ,. ~ ~ '! ~! ~I ~f ~I ~~ ""::1 1 ~' J I !,!i~ g;" ~g~~~ ~~d,2 ---;::::n -,"-n -~::~ (') Z Zz ..... ("'J Zo = :51-~ W tl.Z > lzli! = W UJ"-::;0 :z: (.) ~~ :::> W ..J---. a: UJO > UJ 0 J ---- -- ~ .. - UNIT 101 BU)G1 UNIT 102 LA~DSCAPE PLAN SCalP. 1-= 10'-4" •• N.E. 9TH Pl. ~ ! !"DSC"Pf 'EGEND 3/'4 .. p\c IRRAOATION UNE @ ....... TION HEAD @ CCHFER 3", MAX HElCHT tt RR OR PH: .......,..,.... j. - -~-;l-.< 1_' . < ··-"i -.-... ~-----" .. lei, . --... t:?:)VIHE UAPI.£ • ACER QRCINATUlI '-10"-12' hII1! • .:5 atam " <Q'> DROUGHT Ta..ERANT SHRUB-ROSMARINUS 0fF1QNAIJS \::J (E\UlGREDI StIRt.8) GAU..CII 36" o.c. Q. ~ . AMAH KRUSCHK£ O£ER '-21'-24' 0' spodnQ---"O.tarvbl' requhd. 30 prapoeed. Note u.. ESCAI.LONA (~ shrub) for 4 of the <6> fl • • --AVLEA • GAIETY • / E\OGREEN -9CIIJon 31· o.c. SAROOCOCCA RUSCIfaJA-...... box gGIon 38" o.c. _ coTlJNEAS'l[Jt (ADPRESSUS) ........ --.m dI p.snd ccwc:r pfan""aL 2M!: of all pIonQlp rtlqUlred Ian~ oreas to 1M iow " uaop/ drau9'rt ttWant plant&. ,.. + + LAIH AREAS ... ~ AZJUA PURP9tE SPl.DCDER .."., ~ t;g hatee. ~ ~\dII pd."" day. IntMduaI ~ reqdc ~ C~ f'd'. up) to bel ~ (lilt 011. thIt day cdy-*""! entry fence. ""'" ~ __ from rooI:I drM:=:I to be ~ (~ G I'OCIh. 01 ..t:cr ~ 0 ~ Iaroc:e). ~ to t!Ie!!tlonn~ ~ ~ • ~~ fenc:I::I-. dr".n: ofcac:b __ tnIeI:toberSmed~tof"'Of"Cl'tY.AII ~ w:Iw;Ies..~ • ....terNb tobo I:ept'-~~-' DEVELOPMENT PlANNING CITY OF RENTON - _AUG 242004 RECEIVED JIlL. 1-...... (rt ? {. -r- 6'" '" ~ ~ ~ z ~ Eo< QO I ZONING PIBIPW 'I'ECIINlCAL BBB.VICB8 I2J04I03 - - - -Reut.oll Olt, lJmSl,II R-8( '" .. '"'l t! z ~ -8 ~ RM-j o 200 400 tr-'aOO E4 8 T23N R5E E 112 S308 C'ON~NG MAP BOJK BESIny;NIIM [K] R".oure" Con.en-aUon ~ RealdenUal 1 du/ae ~ R""ldenU.1 ~ dulac ~ RealdenU.' 6 dulac ~ Residential Yanul.elured Homes 11t-10 I Residential 10 dulac B Residential 14 dulac I RH-I [ ResldenUal YulU-FamllJ' InlUl IRM-N[ Residential YulU-Famlly Nel,hborhood Center II!M-C I ne.ldenU.1 "uIU-Famll,. Suburban Center MIXEP USE CENTER o Center Nei,hborhoodO ~ Center Suburban" ~ Urban Center -North ~ Urban Center -North 2 QD Center Downtown" ~ Center Ofrlco R".ldenUal COMMERCIA! o Commercial Arterial· [§:] CommercIal Oftlc,,' CEQ COO1'enleDCe Commercial mID1STRIAI. 0 Indultrial -He .... ' 0 Indultrial -Medium 0 Indullrial -Ulht (1") Publicly o1ll'ned ___ Renton Cll1' Umllll ___ Adjacent City Llmlll KROll PAGE IRM-r[ R"aldenU.l Yulll-FlllIllly 1'l'adltlonal [lIMon I RealdeuU.l "uIU-Famlly Urban Center" ... ay include Overlay Dlatr:lcta. See Appendl:l mapa. For additional re,ulaUonl in Overl., Diltrieu, plea." .,," Rye 4-3. PAGE# INDEX ~.~ .. ,. ..A - CITY ~'6"'\~'\ e fi'RENTON PlanningIBuiJdinglPublic Works Deplll1ment Gregg Zimmerman P.E., Administrator Kathy Keolker-Wheeler. Mayor August 3, 2004 A3 Investments LLC Omied Pazooki 6100 Southcenter Blvd. #250 Tukwila. WA 98188 SUBJECT: PAZOOKI TOWNHOUSES SHORT PLAT REQUEST FOR MODIFICATION Dear Mr. Pazooki: The City of Renton has received your street modification request associated with the proposed 2·lot multi- family short plat located generally at the intersection of Edmonds Avenue NE and NE 10" Place. This is an infill development in an existing neighborhood with access proposed from-Edmonds Avenue NE although there is frontage on both rights-of-way. NE 10" Place is public right-of-way that currently provides access to an apartment building and at least one single-family residence. The 'proposed modification requests a waiver of street improvements o~ NE lOlh Place. The Street Modification request is hereby approved subject to three (3) conditions as listed below. City Code 4-6-050 (Street Standards) requires full street improvements for all adjacent rights-of-way for, within and dedicated by a plat. The City can modify street improvements for new plats if there are practical difficulties in carrying out the provisions of the Street Improvement Ordinance. The Modification Procedures as defined in Section 4-9; 250D clearly states the criteria for approval by the Department Administrator. In order for a modification to be approved, the Department Administrator must "find that a special individual reason makes the strict letter of this Ordinance impractical, that the modification is in conformity with the intent and purpose of this Ordinance, and that such modifil;:ation: (a) Will meet the objectives and safety, function, appearance, environmental protection and maintainability intended by this Ordinance, based upOn sound engineering judgment; and (b) Will not be injurious to other property(s) in the vicinity; and (c) Conform to the intent and purpose of the Code; and (d) Can be shown to be justified and required for the use and situation intended; and (e) Will not create adverse impacts to other properties in the vicinity." Meets objectives and safety, function: NE 10" Place is a dead-end at this location with no possibility of extension. It currently serves as access for an apartment building and single-family homes. The' intent of public and emergency access and pedestrian amenities is not met with the modification as proposed, but can be mitigated by condition of providing a minimum of 20-feet of pavement, no parking signage to protect the access, and a pedestrian walkway. This provides emergency access to all portions o(the proposed project, safe pedestrian movement, and continued access both domestic and emergency to all the properties: Not injurious or adversely impact adjacent properties: Adjacent properties are not injured nor adversely impact<;d as all construction occurs within existing right-of-way. Conforms to the intent of the code: The intent of providing for the city street network is met with the insuring and protecting the minimum pavement width and installing a pedestrian walkway in the frontage of the short plat along NE 10" Place. ------------~10~5~5~S-ou-th~G-ra~d-y=W~ay~-R~e-D-to-n~,W~as7h~in-gt-o-D~9~8~05~5~-----------~ * This paper cootains 50% recycled material, 30% post consumer AHEAD OF THE CURVE Justified and required for use and situation intended: The zoning of this parcel is RM-C, Residential Multi- family. Suburban Center. The modifications as requested allow the maximum density and number of units that still meet the various setbacks and access criteria. The plat provides the minimum necessary for full use for access, emergency and domestic, as weB as pedestrian amenities. The Street Modification is approved subject to the following conditions: 1. If not cnrrently existing, 20-feet minimum width of pavement (not including the required walkway) shall be provided for the full frontage along NE 10.0 Place. This is subject to verification, and if needed, installation prior to occupancy of any unit. 2. In any location where there is less than 28 feet of pavement, "No Parking" signage sball be installed on both sides of the right-of-way prior to occupancy of any unit. 3. A five foot wide pedestrian walk way shall be constructed and delineated along the south side of NE 10" Place to the satisfaction of the Development Services Division prior to occupancy of any unit. This decision to approve the proposed Street Modification is subject to a fourteen (14) day appeal period from the date of this letter. Any appeals of the administrative decision must be filed with the City of Renton Hearing Examiner by 5:00 p.m., August 18,2004. ' ' Appeals must be filed in writing together with the required $75.00 application fee with: Hearing Examiner, City of Renton, 1055 South Grady Way, Renton, WA 98055. Appeals to the Examiner are governed by City of R,nton Municipal Code S,?ction 4-8-11 O. Additional information regarding the appeal process may be,obtained from the Renton City Clerk's Office, (425) 430- 6510. If you have any questions, please contact Michael Dotson at (425) 430-7304, Sincerely, ~1r:i~' ~~G~ Development Engineering Supervisor Public Works Inspections & Permits cc: Land Use File Neil Watts Michael Dotson DATE: TO: FROM: CITY OF RENTON PLANNING/BUILDING/PUBLIC WORKS MEMORANDUM July 12,2004 Nancy Weil Sonja J. Fesser.}~ SUBJECT: Pazooki Townhouses Short Plat, LUA-04-061-SHPL Fonnat and Legal Description Review - Bob Mac Onie and I have reviewed the above referenced short plat submittal and have the following comments: Comments for the Applicant regarding the preliminary short plat submittal: / The spelling for the street name (Edmonds Ave NE) is incorrect on the preliminary short plat map submittal (Sheet 2 of 7), and on the other six drawings as well. See the attachment for a change to be made to the legal description. Refer to the legal description in "Exhibit A" of the Lawyers Title Agency of Washington Commitment Report, Order No. 357647, dated may 27, 2004, for confirmation of this needed correction. Information needed for final short plat approval includes the following: Note the City of Renton land use action number and land record number, LUA-04-061- SHPL and LND-20-0378, respectively, on the short plat drawing. The type size used for the land record number should be smaller than that used for the land use action number. A licensed surveyor will need to prepare and stamp, sign and date the final short plat drawing(s). Show ties (2) to the City of Renton Survey Control Network. The geometry will be checked when the ties have been provided. Provide short plat and lot closure calculations. \H:\File Sys\LND -Land Subdivision & Surveying Records\LND-20 -Short Plats\0378\RV040707.doc July 12, 2004 Page 2 Include a statement of equipment and procedures used, per WAC 332-130-100. Note the dates the existing monuments were visited, per WAC 332-130-150, and what was found. Indicate what has been, or is to be, set at the corners of the proposed lots. Note discrepancies between bearings and distances of record and those measured or calculated, if any. Note all easements, agreements and covenants of record on the drawing, if any. The city will provide addresses as soon as required. Said addresses need to be noted on the drawing. On the final short plat submittal, remove all references to utility facilities, curb and gutter and other items on the drawing not directly impacting the subdivision. These items are provided only for preliminary short plat approval. For the final submittal, remove the site zoning, setbacks, density, comprehensive plan land use designation and parking requirements from the "SITE DATA" block. The City of Renton Administrator of Planning/BuildinglPublic Works is the only city official who signs this short plat drawing. Provide an appropriate approval block and signature line for him. Provide King County approval blocks as needed. All vested owner(s) of the subject short plat need to sign the final short plat submittal. Include notary blocks as needed. Include a declaration block on the drawing. Note that if there are easements, agreements or restrictive covenants to others (City of Renton, etc.) as part of this subdivision, they can be recorded concurrently with the short plat. The short plat drawing and the associated document(s) are to be given to the Project Manager as a package. The short plat will have the first recording number (recorded by King County). Provide references to the associated document(s), and spaces for the recording number(s) thereof, on the short plat drawing to allow for cross-referencing. Because this property is not to be used for single-family use, but for multi-family use, it might be better to remove the access and utility easement from the short plat drawing. Neither of the two new lots created is landlocked, so access is not an issue, and the easement does not directly impact the subdivision. li the easement is to be shown on the short plat drawing, the following three paragraphs illll!!.Y: H;\File Sys\LND -Land Subdivision & Surveying Records\LND-20 -Short Plats\0378\RV040707.doc\cor July 12,2004 Page 3 The new private 24' access and utility easement is for the benefit of future owners of the proposed lots. Since the two lots are under common ownership at the time of short plat recording, there can be no new easement established until such time as ownership of the lot(s) is conveyed to others, together with and/or subject to specific easement rights. Add the following Declaration of Covenant language on the face of the subject drawing: DECLARATION OF COVENANT: The owner of the land embraced within this short plat, in return for the benefit to accrue from this subdivision, by signing hereon covenants and agrees to convey the beneficial interest in the new easement shown on this short plat to any and aI/future purchasers of the lots, or of any subdivision thereof This covenant shall run with the land as shown on this short plat. The private access and utility easement requires a "NEW PRN ATE EASEMENT FOR INGRESS, EGRESS & UTILITIES MAINTENANCE AGREEMENT" statement to be noted on the short plat drawing. See the attachment. Fee Review Comments: The Fee Review Sheet for this review of the preliminary short plat is provided for your use and information. Building/construction permits, not the short plat, trigger the fees noted on said fee sheet. H:\File Sys\LND ~ Land Subdivision & Surveying Records\LND-20 -Short Plals\0378\RV040707.doc\cor • 10 C7> b z 4, 10 I .. MERIDIAN PLAT 1 "=1 0' 5 0 10 ; t I GRAPHIC SCALE IN FEET PROPERTY DESCRIPTION: 20 I lHAT PORTION Of' THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER or SECTION 9, TOIW>4SHIP 23 NORTH, RANGE 5 EAST., W.II., DESCRIBED AS FOlLOWS: SUBDIVISI : AN? _ ENCE NORTH AlONG THE WEST UNE OF SAID BEGINNIN~~~ ~T CORNER OF THE EAST HAlF OF SAID EAST HAlF -----THE lRUE P,OINT or BEGINNING Of' THE lRACT; lHENCE WEST AlONG A UNE PARAU£L WITH THE SOUTH UNE OF SAID SUBDIVISION TO AN INTERSECTION v"lH A,UNE PARALLa v"TH AND 30 FEET EAST OF lHE WEST UNE Of' SAID SECTION 9; THENCE SOUTH AlONG SAID PARAllfl UNE 105 FEET; THENCE EAST AlONG A UNE PARAU£L v"TH THE SOUlH UNE or SAID SUBDIVISION TO THE WEST UNE OF THE EAST ONE HALF or SAID SUBDIVISION; THENCE NORTH AlONG SAID WEST UNE 105 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING; SITUATE IN THE COUNTY OF KING, STATE or WASHINGTON. SUBJECT TO RESERVATION OF RECORD. ELEVATIONS: REFER TO SURVEY CONlROL DATABASE -POINT 10: 6173. NA VID: 88. Bot. T IN SIGNAl FOOTING. THE MARK IS IN RENTON, AT lHE NORTHWEST ANGLE OF THE INTERSECTION OF SUNSET Bl VID AND EDIIONDS AVE NE. THE IIARK IS THE TOP or THE BOLT IN THE SOUTHVEST CORNER OF THE CONCRETE FOOTING FOR THE lRAFFIC SIGNAL ELEV. ~ 282.815 FEET CONTOUR INTERVAl - 2 FOOT SITE DATA SITE ADDRESS: 972 EDIIONDS AVE N.E. RENTON, WA TOTAL SITE AREA =' 13,737 S.F. = 0.32 AC. PROPOSED NO. or lOTS a 2 PROPOSED AREA OF LOT 1 -6868.5 SF PROPOSED AREA OF LOT 2 -6868.5 SF SITE ZONING: RII-C COIIPREHENSIVE PLAN LAND USE DESIGNATION: MULTI-FAMILY INFlLL SETBACKS: FRONT -20' SIDES -r (3 STORY HIGH) REAR -15' DEVELOPMEm PLANNIN" CITY OF REmON • Title for both ofthe (ollowing paragraphs: NEW PRIVATE EASEMENT FOR INGRESS, EGRESS & UTILITIES MAINTENANCE AGREEMENT Use the following paragraph if there are two or more lots participating in the agreement: NOTE: NEW PRIVATE EXCLUSIVE EASEMENT FOR INGRESS, EGRESS AND UTILITIES IS TO BE CREATED UPON THE SALE OF LOTS SHOWN ON TffiS SHORT PLAT. THE OWNERS OF LOTS SHALL HA VB AN EQUAL AND UNDIVIDED INTEREST IN THE OWNERSHIP AND RESPONSIDILITY FOR MAINTENANCE OF THE PRIVATE ACCESS EASEMENT APPURTENANCES. THESE APPURTENANCES AND MAINTENANCE RESPONSIDILITIES INCLUDE THE REPAIR AND MAINTENANCE OF THE PRIVATE ACCESS ROAD, DRAINAGE PIPES, AND STORM WATER QUALITY AND/OR DETENTION FACILITIES WITHIN TillS EASEMENT, PRIVATE SIGNAGE, AND OTHER INFRASTRUCTURE NOT OWNED BY THE CITY OF RENTON OR OTHER UTILITY PROVIDERS. MAINTENANCE COSTS SHALL BE SHARED EQUALLY. PARKlNG ON THE PAVING IN THE ACCESS EASEMENT IS PROHIDITED, UNLESS PAVEMENT WIDTH IS GREATER THAN 20 FEET. Use the following paragraph if there is one lot subject to the agreement: NOTE: NEW PRIVATE EXCLUSIVE EASEMENT FOR INGRESS, EGRESS AND UTILITIES IS TO BE CREATED UPON THE SALE OF LOTS SHOWN ON TillS SHORT PLAT. THE OWNER OF LOT . SHALL HAVE OWNERSHIP AND RESPONSIDILITY FOR MAINTENANCE OF THE PRIVATE ACCESS EASEMENT APPURTENANCES. THESE APPURTENANCES AND MAINTENANCE RESPONSIDILITIES INCLUDE THE REPAIR AND MAINTENANCE OF THE PRIVATE ACCESS ROAD, DRAINAGE PIPES, AND STORM WATER QUALITY AND/OR DETENTION FACILITIES WITHIN THIS EASEMENT, PRIVATE SIGN AGE, AND OTHER INFRASTRUCTURE NOT OWNED BY THE CITY OF RENTON OR OTHER UTILITY PROVIDERS. MAINTENANCE COSTS SHALL BE SHARED EQUALLY. PARKlNG ON THE PAVING IN THE ACCESS EASEMENT IS PROHIDITED, UNLESS PAVEMENT WIDTH IS GREATER THAN 20 FEET. PROPERTY SERVIC'-~ <;E REVIEW FOR SUBDIVISIONS No, -33 APPLICANT: 1?:AZO?k', 5, AYOO'''21=L(,A:~-'-U'.tI=:'5pY!Eb qn I , C) RECErvED FROM ------;7-:-;-- (date) NATURE OF WORK: e:-l1"5f;;:!r;F£FiK (F>A;<;;kJ TdNf~ LND # Po -Nne JOB ADDRFSS:~E Eb~ ~ffi !.IE: <'t) WO# 77ec;:,4- X PRELIMINARY REVIEW OF SUBDIVISION BY ONG PLAT, NEED MORE INFORMATION: -LEGAL DESCRIPTION SHORT PLAT, BINDING SITE PLAN, ETC. PID #'s VICINITY MAP -FINAL REVIEW OF SUBDIVISION, THIS REVIEW REPLACES SQUARE FOOTAGE -OTIIER PRELIMINARY FEE REVIEW DATED FRONT FOOTAGE SUBJECT PROPERTY PARENT PIDU Oqea05-q I B I 'l( NEW KING CO. TAX ACCT.#(s) are required when assigned by King County. It is the intent of dUs development fee analysis to put the.developer/owner on notice, th,at die fees quoted below may be appliCable to the subject site upon development of the property. All quoted fees are potential charges that may be due am payable at the time the construction permit is issued to install the on-site and off-site improvements (i.e. underground utilities, street improvements. etc.) Triggering mechanisms for lhe SOC fees will be based on current City ordinances and detennined by the applicable Utility Section. . - Please IlOte that these fees are subject to change without notice. Final fees will be based on I1ltes in effect at time of Building Permit/Construction Pennit application. The existing house on SP Lot # , addressed as has not previously paid -:-:--c-:--=SDC fees, due to connection to City utilities prior to existance of SDC fee Oed. SP LotH will be subject to futufe SDC fees if triggering mechanisms are touched within current City Ordinances. We understand that this subdivision is in the preliminary stage and that we will have the opportunity to review it again before recordation. 1 The following quoted fees do NOT include i~pection fees, side sewer:_permits. r w vennit fees or die cost of water meters. SPECIAL ASSESSMENT DISfRICf PARCEL METHOD OF ASSESSMENT ASSESSMENT DISfRICTS NO. NO. ASSESSMENT UNITS OR FEE Latecomer Agreemenl (pvt) WATER -0- Latecomer Agreement (nvt) W ASTEW ATER -0- Latecomer A2reement (pvt) OTlIER -0 - -/ Special Assessment DistrictlW ATER '/-0- / Special Assessment DistrictfW ASfEWA TER /-0- Joint Use Agreement (METRO) - Local hnprovement District • Traffic Benefit Zones $75.00 PER TRIP, CALCULATED BY TRANSPORTATION FUTURE OBLIGATIONS I I - SYSTEM DEVELOPMENT CHARGE -WATER .. Estimated # OF UNITSI SDCFEE -Pd Prevo -Partially Pd (Ltd Exemption) -Never Pd SQ. FTG. Single family residential $1,S25/unit x Mobile home dwelling unit $1220/unit in park .. Apartment, Condo $91S/unit not in CD or COR zones x F.. $4-575.no Commercial/Industrial, $0.213/sg, ft. of property (not less than $1,525.00) x Boeing, by Special Agreement/Footprint of Bldg plus 15 ft perimeter (2.800 GPM threshold) SYSTEM DEVELOPMENT CHARGE - W ASTEW ATER" Estimated -Pd Prevo -Partially Pd (Ltd Exemption) -Never Pd Sin~le family residential $900/unit x Mobile home dwelling unit $720/unit x Apartment, Condo $54O/uoit not in CD or COR zones x Co 9;.~ ;>..v-, """' Commercial/Industrial $0.126IsQ. ft. of property x(not less than $900.00) SYSTEM DEVELOPMENT CHARGE -SURFACEWATER .. Estimated -Pd Prevo -Partially Pd (Ltd Exemption) -Never Pd Sin~le family residential and mobile home dwelling unit $715/uoit x All other properties $O.249/sq ft of new impervious area of property x 8,040 ~.1=1 . $ ;:',o7c:;.c;..:; (not less than $715.00) f-.JE:M( I Ml"ERvIOUe. N=l'E:A. = I PRELIMINARY TOTAL $ ~ $ "l,eA I.G(;; ~/"""'" ) (l l +C¢NXh ) 7~~ '" '" • 0 • 0 " Signa(ur~ Revi(jdng Authority DJ\: E .. , " ~ *If suhject property is within an LID, it is developers responsibility 10 check with the Finance Dept. for paid/un-paid status. • < " Square footage figures arc taken from the King County Assessor's map and are subject to Change. • < Current City SDC fee charges apply 10 " 0 EFFECTIVE Janu~lry 1,2004 '>I' l=EI:::b 1D ee:~IGjGjEREI::> -e"( -FtJeLIC WoRk.~ '5l.J1LblI-...J6, 1G:::>IJ.!:!:o~cnou '"PERMIT'b -\.Jor ~~ ~I-l,..,i=;f;" -hI To: Nauncy Wei!, Associate pnaHnlmer City of Renton 1055 §outlln Grady Way lRentonn, W A 98®55 m;i:::mce 4HBtRnonne, ClEO ---.... MA Qillilk lFraminng Hnc. mnt en «lI. §unite 20 TunlkwdUa, W A 98188 8-2700 PIln (206) 2418-2702 lFx U: Townllnounse §Dnort PBat lL1UA®41-®61, §lH!lPlL-A,IEClF Conected lLamliscapDng as per ArclnfitedunraB ID>rawiHng Page 3 oH9 Correctiollls as per MA Qunilk lFraminng Hnne. lLanndsca-pinng Separate wdtlln HrrngatiOlin Rounglln Plan lLPI Please caBllLaunraunce AntJllonne at the numlDer listed alDove with any questions. Rentonnet Plat Index Search Range: Township: Section: Otr. Section: Property Type: Area: Sub Area: Jurisdiction: Levy Code: Current Zoning: HBU As If Vacant: HBU As Improved: Present Use: Lot Square Footage: Water System: Sewer System: Access: Street Surface: Traffic Volume: Percent Unusable: Waterfront Footage: General Parcel Information 5 23 9 NW Residential 032 003 RENTON 2100 RM-C SINGLE FAMILY PRESENT USE Single Family(Res Use/Zone) 13503 Property Features WATER DISTRICT PUBLIC PUBLIC PAVED o o o Waterfront Access Rights: No Waterfront Proximity Influence: No http://rentonnet.org/intranetlkcaiindex . cfm ?fuseaction=show land&R = 1 Page 1 of 1 09/17/2004 CITY OF RENTON CURRENT PLANNING DIVISION AFFIDAVIT OF SERVICE BY MAILING On the 13'h day of August, 2004, I deposited in the mails of the United States, a sealed envelope containing ERC Determination Appeal period ended -no appeals filed documents. This information was sent to: I·i.~.,i "",:r",,:;f~ Omied Pazooki Contact A3 Investments, LLC Owner Saivoosh Pazooki Applicant ~""7,dw~JY _---~~.1 ~~C'~ ) 0 f~fi~~~TAIY" ~q (Signature of S",,,-''' -, /" STATE OF WASHINGTON ) SS : <>.... : COUNTY OF KING ) ~\ "UBLIC ./ I certify that I know or have satisfactory evidence that Stacy Tucker ;~~~:?~.-.~7·····t~ signed this instrument and acknowledged it to be his/her/their free and voluntary act : :~ u, 'u purposes mentioned in the instrument. Dated: ~ t1l.. 9)0) .;xPcYl (j Notary (Print): ____ .tlUM.wAB:wIl .... VbIlLI .... KA ... M .. I'~"'E .. a:'__ ___________ _ My appointment expires: MY APPOINTMENT EXPIRES 6-29.07 '" ~ .. , 'Pro!ectrName, Pazooki Townhomes Short Plat i,Plo/e\l!,l\Iumber:'J LUA04-061, SHPL-A, SA-A, ECF 0' ___ ~.~. "10 ..&I. -Kathy Keolker-Wheeler, Mayor August 13, 2004 Omied Pazooki 3404 N E 6th Street Renton, WA 98056 SUBJECT: Pazooki Short Plat & Townhomes LUA04-061., SA-A, SHPL-A, ECF Dear Mr. Pazooki CITY \F RENTON PIanningIBuildinglPublic Works Department Gregg Zimmerman P.E.,Administrator This letter is to inform you that the appeal period has ended for the Environmental Review Committee's (ERC) Determination of Non-Significance -Mitigated for the above-referenced project. No appeals were filed on the ERC determination. This decision is final and the applicant must comply with all ERC Mitigation Measures. At this time, the administrative short plat and site plan approval are pending. If you have any questions, please feel free to contact me at (425) 430-7270. For the Environmental Review Committee, C\~~LJj) Nancy Wei I Associate Planner cc: A3 Investments, LLC / Owner Siavoosh Pazooki / Applicant ------;-;1 O;O:SC";"S"""S-ou--:t;-h ""'a--:ra--;d'-y"'"'W7"a-y--""Re-n-:-to-n-, ;;-W,..as""'"h-;-in-g.,-to-n--:9"'S"'O";"SS;;-------~ * This papcrcontains 50% recycled material, 30% post consumer AHEAD OF THE CURVE Mayor August3,2004 Omied Pazooki 3404 NE 6th Street Renton, WA 98056 Subject: Pazooki Short Plat & Townhouses LUA-04-061, SA-A, SHPL-A, ECF Dear Mr. Pazooki: CITY J1F RENTON PlanningIBuildinglPublicWorks Department Gregg Zimmerman P.E., Administrator This is in reference to the review of the subject site plan and plat. As discussed with you, due to the inadequate landscaping plan, staff in unable to recommend approval of the proposed site plan and short plat. Therefore, staff is recommending the landscape plan be revised to comply with the code requirements. Therefore, the Pazookl Short Plat & Townhouses Site Plan and Short Plat land use· application (file no. LUA-04-061) has been placed "on hold." Once the landscape plan has been-revised which conforms to the .City's code requirements, please subniit 5 copies for staff review. We will then take the project off-hold and proceed with review and preparation of the staffs recommendation for administrative review. Please contact me at (425) 430-7270 if you have any questions. Sincerely, . C\~"o-()~ NancyWeil Associate Planner cc: A3 Investment, LLC I Owner Siavoosh Pazooki I Applicant Project File ~1~10~LHD~I~t1------~~--~~-=~~----~~~(--~~~-----------~REN TON 1055 South Grady Way -Renton, Washington 98055 AHEAD OF THE CURVE ~.~ .,,' ..u. - CITY J~ RENTON PlanningIBuiJdinglPublic Works Department Gregg Zimmerman P.E~Admlnistrator Kathy Keolker·Wbeeler. Mayor August 3. 2004 A3 Investments LLC Omied Pazooki 6100 Southcenter Blvd. #250 Tukwila. WA 98188 SUBJECT: PAWOKI TOWNHOUSES SHORT PLA T REQUEST FOR MODIFICATION Dear Mr. Pazooki: The City of Renton has received your street modification request associated with the proposed 2-lot multi- family short plat located generally at the intersection of Edmonds Avenue NE and NE 10" Place. This is an infill development in an existing neighborhood with access proposed' from Edmonds Avenue NE although there is frontage on both rights-of-way. NE 10" Place is public right-of-way that currently provides access to an apartment building and at least one single-family residence. The proposed modification requests a waiv"er of street improvements o~ NE 10th Place. The Street Modification request is hereby approved subject to three (3) conditions as listed below, City Code 4-6-050 (Street Standards) requires full street improvements for all adjacent rights-of-way for, within and dedicated by a plat. The City can modify street improvements for new plats if there are practical difficulties in carrying out the provisions of the Street Improvement Ordinance. The Modificaiion Procedures as defined in Section 4-9- 250D clearly states the criteria for approval by the Department Administrator. In order for a modification to be approved, the Department" Administrator must ''find that a special-iridivi~uaJ reason makes the strict letter of this Ordinance impractical, that the modification is in conformity with the intent and purpose of this Ordinance, and that such modification: (a) Will meet the objectives and safety, function, appearance, environmental protection and maintainability intended by this Ordinance, based upon sound engineering judgment; and (b) Will not be injurious to other property(s) in the vicinity'; and (c) Conform to the intent and purpose of the Code; and (d) Can be shown to be justified and required for the use and situation intended; and (e) Will"not create adverse impacts to other properties in the vicinity." Meets objectives and safety. function: NE lOth Place is a dead-end at this location with no possibility of extension. It currently serves as access for an apartment buHding and single-family homes. The" intent of public and emergency access and pedestrian amenities is not met with the modification as proposed, but can be mitigated by condition of providing a minimum of 20-feet of pavement, no parking signage to protect the access, and a pedestrian walkway. This provides emergency access to all portions of the proposed project, safe pedestrian movement, and continued access both domestic and emergency to all the properties: "Not injurious" or adversely impact adjacent properties: Adjacent properties are not injured nor adversely impac!ed as all construction occ':l~s within existing right-of-way. Conforms to the intent of the code: The intent of providing for the city street network is met with the insuring and protecting the minimum pavement width and installing a pedestrian walkway in the frontage of the short plat along NE 10" Place. -------------1~0~5~5~S-ou-t~h~G~ra-d~y~W~a-y--~R~e-n-to-n~,~~as~h~in-g-to-n-9~8~O~5~5-------------~ ~ Thi<:."",.."rNYlt"';n"t;()I>JA......-vri<>rt'""""t..n .. t ~t.nn<:.t ........... <:,......." AHEAD OF THE CURVE r \ Justified and required for use and situation intended: The zoning of this parcel is RM-C, Residential Multi- family, Suburban Center. The modifications as requested allow the maximum density and number of units that still meet the various setbacks and access criteria. The plat provides the minimum necessary for full use for access, emergency and domestic, as well as pedestrian amenities .. The Street Modification is approved subject to the following conditions: 1. If not currently existing, 20-feet minimum width of pavement (not including the required walkway) shall be provided for the full frontage along NE 10" Place. This is subject to verification, and if needed, installation prior to occupancy of any unit. 2. In any location where there is less than 28 feet of pavement, "No Parking" signage sball be installed on both sides of the right-of-way prior to occupancy of any unit. 3. A five foot wide pedestrian walk way shaD be constructed and delineated along the south side of NE 10" Place to the satisfaction of the Development Services Division prior to occupancy of any unit. This decision to approve the proposed Street Modification is subject to a fourteen (14) day appeal period from the date of this letter. Any appeals of the administrative decision must be filed with the City of Renton Hearing Examiner by 5:00 p.m .• August 18,2004. . Appeals must be filed in writing together with the required $75.00 application fee with: Hearing Examiner. City of Renton. 1055 South Grady Way. Renton. WA 98055. Appeals to the Examiner are governed by City of ~~nt.on 1-1unicipal Code Section 4-8-110. Additional information regarding the appeal process may be.obtained froin the Renton City Clerk's Office. (425) 430- 6510. If you have any questions. please contact Michael Dotson at (425) 430-7304. Sincerely. ~1t:i~' t~G~ Development Engineering Supervisor Public Works Inspections & Permits cc: Land Use File Neil Watts Michael Dotson , , ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION ISSUANCE OF A DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE -MITIGATED (ONS-M) POSTED TO NOTIFY INTERESTED PERSONS OF AN ENVIRONMENTAL ACTION PROJECT N.&.ME: PUDold Townhou ••• Short PI_I PROJECT NUMBER: LUA()4.061, SA-A, SHPL-A, ECF LOCATION: 872 Edmonds AVln". NE DESCRIPTION: Th' 'ppIiClln! II propollng to divide the exlttlnll p.Tcel II 972 Edmonds Avenue NE Inlo two tot. Ind denlop 6-unlt mun~lamlly In two building" with on. trl-pl.x on .ach lot Th, ,It I II zoned Resldantlal Mum-Family -Suburban Cantl' (RMoC) with In ulltlnll 650 Iqu.r. IDOl 'Inilia 'amlly tINcture end 484 .qua .. 1001 dltachld garage. Both Itruetu ....... propo,eel to be' ramoYed, Ttl, ,tI, I, on tha corne, 01 EdmondS AVefl"l HE end NE 10th Ptau howlve, ICC ... \0 the III. I, propond on 01 Edmonds AnnUl by • 20- loot wldl shared drlvlway. The propo.ld multl-Iamlly Itructur .. arl pro pOled to bl 3-.tory with perkinII' undlr thl unit •• Thl propoHd slllimprovlmlnt, THE CITY OF RENTON ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COMMITTEE (ERG) HAS DETERMINED THAT THE PROPOSED ACTION DOES NOT HAVE A SIGNIFICANT ADVERSE IMPACT ON THE ENVIRONMENT, APPEALS OF THE ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION MUST BE FILED IN WRITING ON OR BEFORE 5:00 PM AUGUST 9, 2004. APPEALS MUST BE FILED IN WRITING TOGETHER WITH THE REOUIRED $75.00 APPLICATION FEE WITH: HEARING EXAMINER, CITY OF RENTON, 1055 SOUTH GRADY WAY, RENTON, WA 98055. APPEALS TO THE EXAMINER ARE GOVERNED BY CITY OF RENTON MUNICIPAL CODE SECTION 4-6-110B. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION REGARDING THE APPEAL PROCESS MAY BE OBTAINED FROM THE RENTON CITY CLERK'S OFFICE, (425) 430-6510. r1~1~~~~~~;;,r FOR FURTHER INFORMATION, PLEASE SERVICES I CERTIFICA TION I, 0crcl. JoeL", , hereby.ssrtify that 3, copies of the above document were posted by me in conspicuous places on or nearby the described property on ..Jc,J" Jl, ). DOer , ...... """""\" ( . ( _--.~ -(N KA41. "'" . --_~-.; ,"''''', C'L '" SIgned: _.L!.'--1.!~~~:..:z.U~~,...,r " :'r' ... ' SION ". '1'.. .i ~ .. ~",'S ~i; ... ~TEST: SUbscribed~. :n bef:e me, a Notary P~bI'C. in and f: the S : luO ~OTA<9 ... ~\ "W~hington residing ·n ~~A-n , on the:'\ day Ol",",*~\--"-.Qj~~_ '. r~. ~ ~. ~ : ~.<t (I): ~ ~ ell ~ "USLIC ; : '+;..\ '. : ;it: :I '" " .... ;-.,!I'.29-01 , .... :....0 J '" 0 '.""",--~(:) .: '" 1> WASI'I\ •• -- "1\\, ... \."11. .................... ... MARILYN KAMCHEFF MY APPOINTMENT EXPIRES 6-29-07 ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION ISSUANCE OF A DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE -MITIGATED (DNS-M) POSTED TO NOTIFY INTERESTED PERSONS OF AN ENVIRONMENTAL ACTION PROJECT NAME: PBzookl Townhouses Short Plat PROJECT NUMBER: LUA04-061, SA-A, SHPL-A, ECF LOCATION: 972 Edmonds Avenue NE DESCRIPTION: The applicant Is proposing to divIde the existing parcel at 972 Edmonds Avenue NE Into two lots and develop 6-unlt multi-family In two buildings, with one trt-plex on each lot. The site Is zoned Residential Multi-Family -Suburban Center (RM-C) with an existing 650 square foot single family structure and 484 square foot detached garage. Both structures are proposed to be removed. The site Is on the corner 01 Edmonds Avenue NE and NE 10th Place however access to the site Is proposed off of Edmonds Avenue by a 20- foot wide shared driveway. The proposed multi-family structures are proposed to be 3-story with parking under the units. The proposed site Improvements THE CITY OF RENTON ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COMMITTEE (ERC) HAS DETERMINED THAT THE PROPOSED ACTION DOES NOT HAVE A SIGNIFICANT ADVERSE IMPACT ON THE ENVIRONMENT. APPEALS OF THE ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION MUST BE FILED IN WRITING ON OR BEFORE 5:00 PM AUGUST 9, 2004. APPEALS MUST BE FILED IN WRITING TOGETHER WITH THE REQUIRED $75.00 APPLICATION FEE WITH: HEARING EXAMINER, CITY OF RENTON, 1055 SOUTH GRAOY WAY, RENTON, WA 98055. APPEALS TO THE EXAMINER ARE GOVERNED BY CITY OF RENTON MUNICIPAL CODE SECTION 4-8-110B. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION REGARDING THE APPEAL PROCESS MAY BE OBTAINED FROM THE RENTON CITY CLERK'S OFFICE, (425) 430-6510. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION, PLEASE CONTACT THE CITY OF RENTON, DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DIVISION AT (425) 430-7200. DO NOT REMOVE THIS NOTICE WITHOUT PROPER AUTHORIZATION Piease'lriciudethe project NUMBER' when calling for proper file Identification: "',' , , ... , ,,',";;:i,',' . " " ,.-' , " " '~ ,"" CITY OFRENTON ' , :, " ",:_ ,\" ',_ ._.'" , ' ,d" ' : .. , , ':, "CURRIWT;,PLANI':IINGDIVISION, ' , " ' ' : ,AFFIDAVIT OF SERVICE BY,MAILING " On the 21 st day of July, 2004, I deposited in the mails of the United States, a sealed envelope containing ERC Determination, Mitigation Measures, & Advisory Notes documents. This information was sent to: L' . ,n"'," ;" ,,' ,~;;Ii~~iiJ';'" I '" . ",.:, '''\~' "'" ,ame" ,j L~~';,jl wi:', '5 /i, [)flit;!:,;."':"': :'::tI~Bi:\'preseriti~g"¥ ~ ", • ! .; Agencies See Attached Omied Pazooki Contact Siavoosh Pazooki Applicant A3 Investments LLC Owner ~~ -"-'~N'K;;\", (Signature of Sender):/ ~ ---~\';. ......... 41d;~", i' ~ ... ~\ss'o..., ;;. •. : ~ " O 0 : .. ' ~ +.()'. \:.(\ " STATE FWASHINGT N ) : :8~OTA09!-?>,-n~ ) SS ~ : m~ ~ ~ : I> <:a. "'" ">: ~ COUNTY OF KING ) ~ ~ '.. veLIe .! : ' • .". ...... cr. ••• ~: I certify that I know or have satisfactory evidence that Stacy Tucker '··,t ;;;;:?~:.9~.···~ .... o.._: signed this instrument and acknowledged it to be his/her/their free and voluntary act'f!lr.t~~'an-d purposes mentioned in the instrument. ~ U,7-a:J1{ ~~~;1hf~fWaShingto: Notary (Print): ______ -iMAi7T.R*'llYN~KA~M~C'!lHEfF=----------- My appointment expires: MY APPOINTMENTEXPIRES 6-29-07 'Ptoj~etNuni'Il~i':: LUA04-061, SA-A, SHPL-A, ECF ."., ~ .,., ---'. .., ~-"'., ... ~. template -affidavit of service by mailing •.. . .... Dept. of Ecology· Environmental Review Section PO Box 47703 Olympia, WA 98504-7703 WSDOT Northwest Region· Attn: Ramin Pazooki King Area Dev. Serv., MS-240 PO Box 33031 0 Seattle, WA 98133-9710 US Army Corp. of Engineers· Seattle District Office Attn: SEPA Reviewer PO Box C-3755 Seattle, W A 98124 Jamey Taylor· Depart. of Natural Resources PO Box 47015 Olympia, WA 98504-7015 KC Dev. & Environmental Servo Attn: SEPA Section 900 Oakesdale Ave. SW Renton, WA 98055-1219 Metro Transit Senior Environmental Planner Gary Kriedt AGENCY (DOE) LETTER MAILING (ERe DETERMINATIONS) WDFW -Stewart Reinbold· Muckleshoot Indian Tribe Fisheries Dept. clo Department of Ecology . 3190 160'h Ave SE Attn. SEPA Reviewer Bellevue, WA 98008 39015 -172" Avenue SE Auburn, WA 98092 Duwamish Tribal Office· Muckleshoot Cultural Resources Program 4717 W Marginal Way SW . Seattle, WA 98106-1514 Attn: Ms Melissa Calvert 39015 172" Avenue SE Auburn, WA 98092-9763 KC Wastewater Treatment Division· Office of Archaeology & Historic Environmental Planning Supervisor Preservation· Ms. Shirley Marroquin Attn: Stephanie Kramer 201 S. Jackson ST, MS KSC-NR-050 PO Box 48343 Seattle, WA 98104-3855 Olympia, WA 98504-8343 City of Newcastle City of Kent Attn: Mr. Micheal E. Nicholson Attn: Mr. Fred Satterstrom, AICP Director of Community Development Acting Community Dev. Director 13020 SE 72" Place 220 Fourth Avenue South Newcastle, WA 98059 Kent, WA 98032-5895 Puget Sound Energy City of Tukwila Municipal Liason Manager Steve Lancaster, Responsible Official Joe Jainga 6300 Southcenter Blvd. 201 South Jackson Street KSC-TR-0431 PO Box 90868, MS: XRD-01W Tukwila, WA 98188 Seattle, WA 98104-3856 Bellevue, WA 98009-0868 Seattle Public Utilities Real Estate Services Title Examiner 700 Fifth Avenue, Suite 4900 Seattle, WA 98104-5004 Note: If the Notice of Application states that it is an "Optional DNS", the marked agencies and cities will need to be sent a copy of the checklist, PMT's, and the notice of application .• Also note, do not mail Jamey Taylor any of the notices she gets hers from the web. Only send her the ERC Determination paperwork. template -affidavit of service by mailing STATE OF WASHINGTON, COUNTY OF KING } AFFIDA VIT OF PUBLICATION PUBLIC NOTICE Lily Nguyen, being first duly sworn on oath that she is a Legal Advertising Representative of the King County Journal a daily newspaper, which newspaper is a legal newspaper of general circulation and is now and has been for more than six months prior to the date of publication hereinafter referred to, published in the English language continuously as a daily newspaper in King County, Washington. The King County Journal has been approved as a Legal Newspaper by order of the Superior Court of the State of Washington for King County. The notice in the exact form annexed was published in regular issues of the King County Journal (and not in supplement form) which was regularly distributed to its subscribers during the below stated period. The annexed notice, a Public Notice was published Monday, 7/26/04 The full amount of the fee charged for said foregoing publication is the sum of $91.25 at t~ate of $15.50 per inch for the first publication and NIA per inch for eaohSubS'~uenJ....i.nt;ertion. Lily Nguyen Legal Adv#Sing Representative, King County Journal Subscribed and sworn to me this 26th day of July, 2004. III \11 II I llilii// \\\ q::' III ,~':-"-" ...... ,A..G/i /-1: ,~ r·".,··,,·:· ... ~-9 /~ ::::: ""~ •••• ,,,.$,Cl": <::.{/),;'" "8- .Tom A. Meagher g 1~~~1//:.'. -r R Y ~"'.... ~ Notary Public for the State of Washington, Residing in Redmond, W:llshingtb",i)' ~ : =: - . ' e-. z-Ad Number: 846536 P.O. Number: := ; ~ " f 0 § Cost of publishing this notice includes an affidavit surcharge. ~ 0)"" PuS\..\ '\ .... t; ~ ~ /' •••• 1.Cl~., ~ ~ "/ "1,.. •• ~AY 2 ••••• l.."\: ~ "/: / t: ......... S'<:' ::::-: ////11 0 F W po. \\\\~ ///II! 1/ III \11\\11 NOTICE OF ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COMMITTEE RENTON, WASillNGTON The Environmental Review Committee has issued a Determination of Non-Significance- Mitigated for the following project under the authority of the Renton Municipal Code. Pazooki Townhouses & Short Plat LUA04-061, SA-A, SHPL-A, ECF Location: 972 Edmonds Avenue NE. The applicant is proposing to subdivide the existing parcel at 972 Edmonds Avenue NE into two lots and develop a total of6-units multi- family residential in two buildings, with one tri-plex on each lot. Access is proposed off of Edmonds Avenue by a 20-foot wide shared driveway. The multi-family structures are proposed to be 3-story with parking under the units. The project requires Administrative Short Plat Approval, Administrative Site Plan Review and Environmental Review (SEPA). Appeals of the environmental determination must be filed in writing on or before 5:00 PM August 9, 2004. Appeals must be filed in writing together with the required $75.00 application fee with: Hearing Examiner, City of Renton, 1055 South Grady Way, Renton, WA 98055. Appeals to the Examiner are governed by City of Renton Municipal Code Section 4-8-110B. Additional information regarding the appeal process may be obtained from the Renton City Clerk's Office, (425) 430-6510. Published in the King County Journal July 26, 2004. #846536 ~R Kathy Keolker·Wbeeler. Mayor July 21, 2004 Omied Pazooki 3404 N E 6th Street Renton, WA 98056 SUBJECT: Pazooki Townhouses Short Plat LUA04·061, SA·A, SHPL·A, ECF Dear Mr. Pazooki: CITY F RENTON PlanningIBuildinglPublicWorks Department Gregg Zimmerman P.E., Administrator This letter is written on behalf of the Environmental Review Committee (ERC) and is to advise you that they have completed their review of the subject project. The ERC issued a threshold Determination of Non·Significance·Mitigated with Mitigation Measures. Please refer to the enclosed Mitigation Measures document. Appeals of the environmental determination must be filed in writing on or before 5:00 PM August 9, 2004. Appeals must be filed in writing together with the required $75.00 application fee with: Hearing Examiner, City of Renton, 1055 South Grady Way, Renton, WA 98055. Appeals to the Examiner are governed by City of Renton Municipal Code Section 4·8·11 OB. Additional information regarding the appeal process may be obtained from the Renton City Clerk's Office, (425) 430·6510 . . If the Environmental Determination is appealed, a public hearing date will be set and all parties notified. The preceding information will assist you in planning for implementation of your project and enable you to exercise your appeal rights more fully, if you choose to do so. If you have any questions or desire clarification of the above, please call me at (425) 430·7270. For the Environmental Review Committee, ~~~~~~Mki\ NancyWeil Associate Planner cc: Siavoosh Pazooki IApplicant A3 Investments LLC IOwner Enclosure ------------~lO~5~5~S-ou-t~h~G-ra~d-y~W~a-y-.R~e-n-to-n-,-W-as-h~in-g-to-n-9-8-0-55-------------~ * This paper contains 50% recycled material, 30% post COnsumor AHEAD OF 1'1-1 E CURVE CITY )F RENTON ~R Kathy Keolker-Wheeler, Mayor PlanningIBuildinglPublicWorks Department Gregg Zimmerman P.E.,Administrator July 21. 2004 Washington State Department of Ecology Environmental Review Section PO Box 47703 Olympia, WA 98504·7703 , Subject: Environmental Determinations Transmitted herewith is a copy of the Environmental Determination for the following project reviewed by the Environmental Review Committee (ERG) on July 20, 2004: DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE-MITIGATED PROJECT NAME: PROJECT NUMBER: LOCATION: Pazooki Townhouses Short Plat LUA04-061, SA-A, SHPL-A, ECF 972 Edmonds Avenue NE DESCRIPTION: The applicant is proposing to divide the existing parcel at 972 Edmonds Avenue NE into two lots and develop 6-unit multi·family in two buildings, with one tri- plex on each lot. The site is zoned Residential Multi-Family -Suburban Center (RM·C) with an existing 650 square foot single family structure and 484 square f60t detached garage. Both structures are proposed to be removed. The site is on the corner of Edmonds Avenue NE and NE t Olh Place however access to the site is proposed off of Edmonds Avenue by a 20·foot wide shared driveway, The proposed multi·family structures are proposed to be 3'story with parking under the units. T~e proposed site improveme.nts require Administrative Short Plat. Administrative Site Plan Review and Environmental Review (SEPA). Appeals ol,the environmental determination must bellied in writing on or belore 5:00 PM , August 9, 2004. Appeals must be filed in writing together with the required $75.00 application fee with: Hearing Examiner. City of Renton, 1055 South Grady Way. Renton, WA 98055. Appeals to the Examiner are governed by City of Renton Municipal Code Section 4-8-11 DB. Additional information regarding the appeal process may be obtained from the Renton City Clerk's Office, (425) 430-6510. If you have questions, please call me at (425) 430-7270 For the Environmental Review Committee, NancyWeil Associate Planner cc: King County Wastewater Treatment Division WDFW, Stewart Reinbold David F. Dietzman, Department of Natural Resources WSDOT, Northwest Region Duwamish Tribal Office Rod Malcom, Fisheries, Muckleshoot Indian Tribe (Ordinance) Melissa Calvert, Muckleshoot Cultural Resources Program US Army Corp. of Engineers --E1ElrTCIC:lcIO""SUaTl,,:_te_ p _ha_n_ie:-::-::K-.,.ra-.,.m_e_r,:-o-:cf_fiC-,e_o_f_A_rC_h:-a_e_01_0_9y_&_H.,.is_to_r_ic_p_re_s_e_rv_a_ti_on _____ ~R E N TON 1055 South Grady Way -Renton, Washington 98055 ® This paper contains 50% recycled material, 30% post consumer AHEAD OF THE CURVE CITY OF RENTON DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE-MITIGATED MITIGATION MEASURES APPLICATION NO(S): PROJECT NAME: APPLICANT: LOCATION OF PROPOSAL: LUA04-061, SA-A, SHPL-A, ECF Pazooki Townhouses Short Plat A3 Investments LLC Siavoosh Pazooki 972 Edmonds Avenue NE DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSAL: The applicant is proposing to divide the existing parcel at 972 Edmonds Avenue NE into two lots and develop 6-unit multi-family in two buildings, with one tri-plex on each lot. The site is zoned Residential Multi-Family -Suburban Center (RM-C) with an existing 650 square foot single family structure and 484 square foot detached garage. Both structures are proposed to be removed. The site is on the corner of Edmonds Avenue NE and NE 10th Place however access to the site is proposed off of Edmonds Avenue by a 20- foot wide shared driveway. The proposed multi-family structures are proposed to be 3-story with parking under the units. The proposed site improvements require Administrative Short Plat, Administrative Site Plan Review and Environmental Review (SEPA). LEAD AGENCY: MITIGATION MEASURES: The City of Renton Department of Planning/Building/Public Works Development Planning Section 1. The applicant shall be required to provide a Temporary Erosion and Sedimentation Control Plan (TESCP) designed in accordance with the 2001 Department of Ecology Manual (DOE) and a Construction Mitigation Plan prior to issuance of Construction Permits. 2. The applicant shall pay the appropriate Fire Mitigation Fee based on a rate of $388.00 per new residential unit prior to the issuance of building permits or the recording of the short plat, whichever occurs first. 3. The applicant shall pay the appropriate Traffic Mitigation Fee based on a rate of $75.00 per new residential unit prior to the issuance of the building permits or the recording of the short plat, whichever occurs first. 4. The applicant shall pay the appropriate Parks Mitigation Fee based on a rate of $354.51 per new residential unit prior to the issuance of the building permits or the recording of the short plat, whichever occurs first. CITY OF RENTON DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE-MITIGATED ADVISORY NOTES APPLICATION NO(S): PROJECT NAME: APPLICANT: LOCATION OF PROPOSAL: LUA04-061, SA-A, SHPL-A, ECF Pazooki Townhouses Short Plat A3 Investments LLC Siavoosh Pazooki 972 Edmonds Avenue NE DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSAL: The applicant is proposing to divide the existing parcel at 972 Edmonds Avenue NE into two lots and develop 6-unit multi-family in two buildings, with one tri-plex on each lot. The site is zoned Residential Multi-Family -Suburban Center (RM-C) with an existing 650 square foot single family structure and 484 square foot detached garage. Both structures are proposed to be removed. The site is on the corner of Edmonds Avenue NE and NE 10'h Place however access to the site is proposed off of Edmonds Avenue by a 20- foot wide shared driveway. The proposed multi-family structures are proposed to be 3-story with parking under the units. The proposed site improvements require Administrative Short Plat, Administrative Site Plan Review and Environmental Review (SEPA). LEAD AGENCY: The City of Renton Department of Planning/Building/Public Works Development Planning Section Advisory Notes to Applicant: The following notes are supplemental Information provided in conjunction with the environmental determination. Because these notes are provided as information only, they are not subject to the appeal process for environmental determinations. Planning 1. RMC section 4-4-030.C.2 limits haul hours between 8:30 am to 3:30 pm, Monday through Friday unless otherwise approved by the Development Services Division. The Development Services Division reserves the right to rescind the approved extended haul hours at any time if complaints are received. 2. Within thirty (30) days of completion of grading work, the applicant shall hydro seed or plant an appropriate ground cover over any portion of the site that is graded or cleared of vegetation and where no further construction work will occur within ninety (90) days. Alternative measures such as mulch, sodding, or plastic covering as specified in the current King County Surface Water Management Design Manual as adopted by the City of Renton may be proposed between the dates of November 1 st and March 31 st of each year. The Development Services Division's approval of this work is required prior to final inspection and approval of the permit. 3. Commercial, multi-family, new single-family and other nonresidential construction activities shall be restricted to the hours between seven o'clock (7:00) am and eight o'clock (8:00) pm, Monday through Friday. Work on Saturdays shall be restricted to the hours between nine o'clock (9:00) am and eight o'clock (8:00) pm. No work shall be permitted on Sundays. 4. All landscaping shall be irrigated by an approved irrigation system prior to final occupancy permits. Fire Prevention 1. The preliminary fire flow is 2,250 gpm, one hydrant is required within 150 feet of the structures and two additional hydrants are required within 300 feet of the structures. 2. Separate plans and permits are required for the installation of sprinkler and fire alarm systems. 3. Fire department access roads are required to be 20 feet in width and paved. 4. Street address shall be visible from the public street. Plan Review: Plan Review -WATER 1. City Code requires a System Development Charge (SDC) for all new and re-development. The fee for this mulit-family development is $915.00 per dwelling unit (5-new units X $915 = $4,575.00). 2. The existing 2" water main along NE 10lh Place will be required to be replaced with a 10" watermain. New Hydrant(s) and watermeters may be connected to this line. 3. Any existing sub-standard fire hydrants will be required to be upgraded and/or retrofitted with a quick disconnect Storz fitting. 4. If a fire sprinkler system is required, a separate utility permit and separate plans will be required for the installation of the double detector check valve assembly. 5. Due to the single-family nature of the dwelling units, it is highly recommended that the developer install individual water meters to each unit. Plan Review -SANITARY SEWER 1. City Code requires a System Development Charge (SDC) for any new development. The fee for this development is $540.00 per dwelling unit (6-new units X $540 = $3,240.00). 2. New side-sewer stub-outs are required for each new lot. Plan Review -SURFACE WATER 1. Surface water System Development Charge (SDC) is required for this site. This fee is $0.249 new impervious area ($0.249 X 8,350 sq ft = $2,076.66). 2. A storm and surface water drainage plan and report (per the 1990 King County Surface Water Manual; see the seven Core requirements) are required. The Technical Information Report analysis submitted with this application has covered all of the Core requirements. 3. Any retaining walls greater than 4 feet in height will need to be reviewed under separate Building permits. A licensed engineer with geo-technical expertise must be retained for proposed rockeries greater than four feet in height. The engineer must monitor rockery construction and verify in writing that the rockery was constructed in general accordance with ARC standards and with his/her supplemental recommendations. Plan Review -TRANSPORTATION 1. City Code requires installation of half pavement width on the existing right of way, frontage to the site. The code also requires installing curb, gutter, storm drainage, sidewalk, and street signage along the frontage of the parcel being developed. 2. A Traffic Mitigation Fee of $75.00 per Average Dail~ Trip shall be assessed. The fee for this development has been calculated at $2,306.25 (according to the 7' Addition of the ITE Trip Generation Manual). This fee is payable at time of building permit. Plan Review -GENERAL The following must be completed prior to recording of the short plat: 1. Install new watermain along the frontage of NE 10lh Place. 2. Install new Fire Hydrants in accordance with Fire Flow requirements. 3. All new or existing fire hydrants (specifically required for the development) must be fitted with a quick disconnect Storz fitting. 4. Provide a separate side sewer stub-out connection to each new building lot. Show easement for sidesewer crossing new north lot on the Short Plat Document. 5. Provide a separate water meter connection for each new building lot (note: it is recommended that each unit have it's own individual water meter). 6. Prior to any construction act. .. ,es on the site, Temporary Erosion and SL ,lentation Control (TESC) shall be installed and maintained to the satisfaction of the representative of the Development Services Division for the duration of the project. 7. A Traffic Mitigation Fee of $75.00 per Average Daily Trip shall be assessed. This fee is payable at time of building permit. CITY OF RENTON DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE (MITIGATED) APPLICATION NO(S): LUA04-061, SA-A, SHPL-A, ECF APPLICANT: Siavoosh Pazooki PROJECT NAME: Pazooki Townhouses Short Plat DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSAL: The applicant is proposing to divide the existing parcel at 972 Edmonds Avenue NE into two lots and develop 6-unit multi-family in two buildings, with one tri-plex on each lot. The site is zoned Residential Multi-Family -Suburban Center (RM-C) with an existing 650 square foot single family structure and 484 square foot detached garage. Both structures are proposed to be removed. The site is on the corner of Edmonds Avenue NE and NE 10'h Place however access to the site is proposed off of Edmonds Avenue by a 20- foot wide shared driveway. The proposed multi-family structures are proposed to be 3-story with parking under the units. The proposed site improvements require Administrative Short Plat, Administrative Site Plan Review and Environmental Review (SEPA). LOCATION OF PROPOSAL: LEAD AGENCY: 972 Edmonds Avenue NE The City of Renton Department of Planning/Building/Public Works Development Planning Section The City of Renton Environmental Review Committee has determined that it does not have a probable significant adverse impact on the environment. An Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) is not required under RCW 43.21 C.030(2)(c). Conditions were imposed as mitigation measures by the Environmental Review Committee under their authority of Section 4-6-6 Renton Municipal Code. These conditions are necessary to mitigate environmental impacts identified during the environmental review process. Appeals of the environmental determination must be filed in writing on or before 5:00 PM August 9, 2004. Appeals must be filed in writing together with the required $75.00 application fee with: Hearing Examiner, City of Renton, 1055 South Grady Way, Renton, WA 98055. Appeals to the Examiner are governed by City of Renton Municipal Code Section 4-8-110B. Additional information regarding the appeal process may be obtained from the Renton City Clerk's Office, (425) 430-6510. PUBLICATION DATE: JULY 26, 2004 DATE OF DECISION: JULY 20, 2004 SIGNATURES: DATE ,Hrl;nn/P"h ic Works DATE I Community Services 7 'It-oc( DATE To: From: :; L ' .' ENVIRONIII1ENTAL.,REVIEW COMMITTEE" , ,,'MEETING' NOTICE ';, ,'J','i'jiJ,uly20, 2004 , " I ~, , ,'; ',. , Gregg Zimmerman, Planning/Building/Public Works Administrator Dennis Culp, Community Services Administrator Lee Wheeler, Fire Chief Jennifer Henning, Development Planning ',I' I " Agenda listed below. THE FOLLOWING IS A CONSENT AGENDA Pazookl Townhouses Short Plat LUA04-061, SA-A, SHPL-A, ECF (Wei/J The applicant is proposing to divide the existing parcel at 972 Edmonds Avenue NE into two lots and develop 6-unit multi-family in two buildings, with one tri-plex on each lot. The si,te is zoned Residential Multi-Family -Suburban Center (RM-C) with an existing 650 square foot single family structure and 484 square foot detached garage. Both structures are proposed to be removed. The site is on the corner of Edmonds Avenue NE and NE 10th Place however access to the site is proposed off of Edmonds Avenue by a 20-foot wide shared driveway. The proposed multi-family structures are proposed to be 3-story with parking under the units. The proposed site improvements require Administrative Short Plat, Administrative Site Plan Review and Environmental Review (SEPA). cc: K. Keolker-Wheeler, Mayor J. Covington, Chief Administrative Officer A. Pietsch, EDNSP Administrator ® B. Wolters, EDNSP Director ® J. Gray, Fire Prevention N. Watts, P/B/PW Development Services Director ® F. Kaufman, Hearing Examiner S. Engler, Fire Prevention ® J. Medzegian, Council S. Meyer, P/B/PW Transportation Systems Director R. Lind, Economic Development L. Warren, City Attorney ® STAFF REPORT City of Renton Oeparlment of Planning / Building / Public Works ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COMMITTEE A. BACKGROUND ERC MEETING DA TE Project Name Owner/Applicant File Number Project Description Project Location Exist. Bldg. Area gsf Site Area RECOMMENDA TlON Project Location Map July 20, 2004 PazookiTownhouses A3 Investments LLC Siavoosh Pazooki 6100 Southcenter Blvd. #250 Tukwila, WA 98188 LUA-04-061, SA-A, SHPL-A, ECF Project Manager NancyWeil The applicant is proposing to divide the eXisting parcel at 972 Edmonds Avenue NE into two lots and develop 6-unit multi-family in two buildings, with one tri-plex on each lot. The site is zoned Residential Multi-Family -Suburban Center (RM-C) with an existing 650 square foot single family structure and 484 square foot detached garage. Both structures are pro~osed to be removed. The site is on the corner of Edmonds Avenue NE and NE 10' Place however access to the site is proposed off of Edmonds Avenue by a 20-foot wide shared driveway. The proposed multi-family structures are proposed to be 3-story with parking under the units. The proposed site improvements require Administrative Short Plat, Administrative Site Plan Review and Environmental Review (SEPA). 972 Edmonds Avenue NE 1134 sq It Proposed New Bldgs. Area gsf 5124sq ft 13,503 sq It / 0.31 acres Total Area for Each Lot 6,751sq ft / 0.16 acres Staff Recommend that the Environmental Review Committee issue a Determination of Non-Significance Mitigated (DNS-M) . . ~'"' ::L bJ..-,,.-\"'::t:! ERCRPT City of Renloll PIBIPW Departmellt Pazooki Proiect Ell melltal Review Committee Staff Report LUA-04-06/ SA-A, SHPL-A, ECF REPORT OF JULY 20, 2004 Page 2 0/5 B, RECOMMENDA TlON Based on analysis of probable impacts from the proposal, staff recommends that the Responsible Officials make the following Environmental Determination: DETERMINA TlON OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE Issue DNS with 14 day Appeal Period, Issue DNS with 15 day Comment Period with Concurrent 14 day Appeal Period, DETERMINA TlON OF NON -SIGNIFICANCE -MITIGA TED, xx Issue DNS-M with 14 day Appeal Period, Issue DNS-M with 15 day Comment Period with Concurrent 14 day Appeal Period, C, ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS In compliance with RCW 43.21 C. 240, the following project environmental review addresses only those project impacts that are not adequately addressed under existing development standards and environmental regulations. 1. Earth Impacts: The project area is flat and currently covered approximately 8% with impervious surface, The site is not within any wetlands nor contains any critical slope, Currently, the site has little vegetation or trees, mostly covered with underbrush and one coniferous tree located at the eastern property line, The applicant proposes to demolish the existing structures and construct two 3-story buildings, each containing 3 units with under unit garages, Excavation for the foundation of each new building would cover an area approximately 1,300 square feet. The percentage of total impervious surface area is proposed to be 65%, The general soil types found on the site are Alderwood gravely sandy loom, Approximately 250 cubic feet is expected to be excavated for building pads, According to City maps this project has no sensitive slope on or within 50-feet of the site therefore a Geotechnical Report was not required, While the site is relatively flat and low erosion hazard the applicant should still implement erosion control measures during construction to lessen impacts to adjacent residential use, Therefore, staff recommends the applicant shall mitigate to control possible erosion during site improvements, Mitigation Measures: The applicant shall be required to provide a Temporary Erosion and Sedimentation Control Plan (TESCP) designed in accordance with the 2001 Department of Ecology Manual (DOE) and a Construction Mitigation Plan prior to issuance of Construction Permits, Nexus: SEPA Environmental Regulations; 2001 DOE Erosion Control Manual. 2, Air Impacts: Normal emissions from vehicles and construction equipment will be generated on site during the construction phase of the proposal. Operation of the site for the proposed clinic will generate staff and patient traffic of approximately 31 daily vehicular trips, Vehicular emissions are regulated by the State of Washington and Puget Sound Clean Air Agency, Therefore staff does not recommend any additional measures, Mitigation Measures: No further mitigation is recommended, Nexus: N/A 3. Water ERCRPT Impacts: The proposed site is not located near any surface water body nor impacts any wetlands, The site is not located in the Aquifer Protections Area, The project will be required to meet the City of Renton drainage City of Relit all PIBIPW Dcpartmellt Pllzooki Project Ell' 'IIcl/lal Review Commitlee Staff Report LUA-04-06/ SA-A, SIIPL-A, ECF REPORT OF JULY 20,2004 Page3of5 standards thereby regulating the impact of surface, ground and runoff water, Therefore, no mitigation is recommended, Mitigation Measures: No further mitigation is recommended, Nexus: N/A 5, Fire I Emergency Services Impacts: The proposal would add six new units to the site, which would potentially impact the City's Fire Emergency Services, Therefore, staff recommends that the applicant be required to pay a Fire Mitigation Fee based on a rate of $388,00 per new unit. The fee is estimated at $2,328,00 ($388,00 x 6 new units = $2,328,00) and is payable prior to issuance of the building permits or the recording of the short plat, whichever occurs first. Mitigation Measures: The applicant shall pay the appropriate Fire Mitigation Fee based on a rate of $388,00 per new unit prior to the issuance of building permits, Nexus: SEPA Environmental Regulations; Fire Mitigation Fee Resolution No, 2913, Ordinance 4527 6, Transportation Impacts: The proposal would generate approximately 30.75 daily vehicular trips, Therefore, staff recommends the applicant be required to pay a Traffic Mitigation Fee based on a rate of $75,00 per Average Daily Trip, The fee estimated at $2,306,25 ($75,00 x 30,75 daily trips = $2,306,25) and is payable prior to issuance of the building permits or the recording of the short plat, whichever occurs first. Mitigation Measures: No further mitigation is recommended, Nexus: N/A 7, Parks Impacts: The proposal does not include on-site recreation areas for future residents of the proposed project. There are existing recreational facilities in the area of the subject property and it is anticipated that the proposed development would generate future demand on existing City parks and recreational facilities and programs, Therefore, staff recommends that the applicant be required to pay a Parks Mitigation Fee based on $354,51 per each new unit. The fee is estimated at $2,127,06 ($354,51 x 6 new units = $2,127,06) payable prior to the recording of the final plat. Mitigation Measures: The applicant shall pay the appropriate Parks Mitigation Fee based on $354,51 per new Unit prior to the issuance of building permits or the recording of the short plat, whichever occurs first. Nexus: SEPA Environmental Regulations: Parks Mitigation Fee Resolution No, 3082, Ordinance 4527, D, MITIGA TlON MEASURES ERCRPT 1, The applicant shall be required to provide a Temporary Erosion and Sedimentation Control Plan (TESCP) designed in accordance with the 2001 Department of Ecology Manual (DOE) and a Construction Mitigation Plan prior to issuance of Construction Permits, 2, The applicant shall pay the appropriate Fire Mitigation Fee based on a rate of $388,00 per new residential unit prior to the issuance of building permits or the recording of the short plat, whichever occurs first. 3, The applicant shall pay the appropriate Traffic Mitigation Fee based on a rate of $75,00 per new residential unit prior to the issuance of the building permits or the recording of the short plat, whichever occurs first. 4, The applicant shall pay the appropriate Parks Mitigation Fee based on a rate of $354,51 per new residential unit prior to the issuance of the building permits or the recording of the short plat, whichever occurs first. City ofRenlon PIBIPW Department Pazooki Project REPORT OF JULY 20.2004 E. COMMENTS OF REVIEWING DEPARTMENTS En 'lIental Review Committee Staff Report LUA-04-06/ SA-A, SHPL-A, ECF Page 4 0/5 The proposal has been circulated to City Departmental/Divisional Reviewers for their review. Where applicable, these comments have been incorporated into the text of this report as Mitigation Measures and/or Notes to Applicant . ...lS..-Copies of all Review Comments are contained in the Official File. __ Copies of all Review Comments are attached to this report. Environmental Determination Appeal Process Appeals of the environmental determination must be filed in writing on or before 5:00 PM August 9, 2004. Appeals must be filed in writing together with the required $75.00 application fee with: Hearing Examiner, City of Renton, 1055 South Grady Way, Renton, WA 98055. Appeals to the Examiner are governed by City of Renton Municipal Code Section 4-8-11 OB. Additional information regarding the appeal process may be obtained from the Renton City Clerk's Office, (425) 430-6510. Advisory Notes to Applicant: The following notes are supplemental information provided in conjunction with the environmental determination. Because these notes are provided as information only, they are not subject to the appeal process for environmental determinations. Planning 1. RMC section 4-4-030.C.2 limits haul hours between 8:30 am to 3:30 pm, Monday through Friday unless otherwise approved by the Development Services Division. The Development Services Division reserves the right to rescind the approved extended haul hours at any time if complaints are received. 2. Within thirty (30) days of completion of grading work, the applicant shall hydro seed or plant an appropriate ground cover over any portion of the site that is graded or cleared of vegetation and where no further construction work will occur within ninety (90) days. Alternative measures such as mulch, sodding, or plastic covering as specified in the current King County Surface Water Management Design Manual as adopted by the City of Renton may be proposed between the dates of November 1st and March 31st of each year. The Development Services Division's approval of this work is required prior to final inspection and approval of the permit. 3. Commercial, multi-family, new single-family and other nonresidential construction activities shall be restricted to the hours between seven o'clock (7:00) am and eight o'clock (8:00) pm, Monday through Friday. Work on Saturdays shall be restricted to the hours between nine o'clock (9:00) am and eight o'clock (8:00) pm. No work shall be permitted on Sundays. 4. All landscaping shall be irrigated by an approved irrigation system prior to final occupancy permits. Fire Prevention 1. The preliminary fire flow is 2,250 gpm, one hydrant is required within 150 feet of the structures and two additional hydrants are required within 300 feet of the structures. 2. Separate plans and permits are required for the installation of sprinkler and fire alarm systems. 3. Fire department access roads are required to be 20 feet in width and paved. 4. Street address shall be visible from the public street. Plan Review: Plan Review -WATER 1. City Code requires a System Development Charge (SOC) for all new and re-development. The fee for this mulit- family development is $915.00 per dwelling unit (5-new units X $915 = $4,575.00). 2. The existing 2" water main along NE 10th Place will be required to be replaced with a 10" watermain. New Hydrant(s) and watermeters may be connected to this line. 3. Any existing sub-standard fire hydrants will be required to be upgraded and/or retrofitted with a quick disconnect Storz fitting. ERCRPT City of Relltoll PIBIPW Department Puzooki Project REPORT OF JULY 20,2004 Ell 'nelltal Review Committee Staff Report LUA-04-061 SA-A, SHPL-A, ECF Page 5 0/5 4, If a fire sprinkler system is required, a separate utility permit and separate plans will be required for the installation of the double detector check valve assembly, 5, Due to the single-family nature of the dwelling units, it is highly recommended that the developer install individual water meters to each unit. Plan Review -SANITARY SEWER 1, City Code requires a System Development Charge (SDC) for any new development. The fee for this development is $540,00 per dwelling unit (6-new units X $540 = $3,240,00), 2, New side-sewer stub-outs are required for each new lot. Plan Review -SURFACE WATER 1, Surface water System Development Charge (SOC) is required for this site, This fee is $0,249 new impervious area ($0,249 X 8,350 sq ft = $2,076,66), 2, A storm and surface water drainage plan and report (per the 1990 King County Surface Water Manual; see the seven Core requirements) are required, The Technical Information Report analysis submitted with this application has covered all of the Core requirements, 3, Any retaining walls greater than 4 feet in height will need to be reviewed under separate Building permits, A licensed engineer with geo-technical expertise must be retained for proposed rockeries greater than four feet in height. The engineer must monitor rockery construction and verify in writing that the rockery was constructed in general accordance with ARC standards and with his/her supplemental recommendations, Plan Review -TRANSPORTATION 1, City Code requires installation of half pavement width on the existing right of way, frontage to the site, The code also requires installing curb, gutter, storm drainage, sidewalk, and street signage along the frontage of the parcel being developed, 2, A Traffic Mitigation Fee of $75,00 per Average Daily Trip shall be assessed, The fee for this development has been calculated at $2,306,25 (according to the 7'h Addition of the ITE Trip Generation Manual), This fee is payable at time of building permit. Plan Review -GENERAL The following must be completed prior to recording of the short plat: 1, Install new watermain along the frontage of NE 10'h Place, 2, Install new Fire Hydrants in accordance with Fire Flow requirements, 3, All new or existing fire hydrants (specifically required for the development) must be fitted with a quick disconnect Storz fitting, 4, Provide a separate side sewer stub-out connection to each new building lot. Show easement for sidesewer crossing new north lot on the Short Plat Document. 5, Provide a separate water meter connection for each new building lot (note: it is recommended that each unit have it's own individual water meter), 6, Prior to any construction activities on the site, Temporary Erosion and Sedimentation Control (TESC) shall be installed and maintained to the satisfaction of the representative of the Development Services Division for the duration of the project. 7, A Traffic Mitigation Fee of $75,00 per Average Daily Trip shall be assessed, This fee is payable at time of building permit. ERCRPT A TLAS OF SEA TTLE ::OPY"'GHT£D I pu8USHED e, KROLL MAP COMPANY, INC .. SEATTLE SCALE' INCH. 100 ~EET :a m (") m -< m c L-or _r c :;!~ z 0: -nr = :0' m" ,..., ~" = 0\ = -z, i Z « ...J a.. 0 CJ) W l---Z 0 l- ...J 0 ~ W 0 . ~ (T--'~ --. I. " + ~ , :~ ,'" 'I " (':, ,"; " , • !'=i'l I I I I I: I· ,; I \ 1 ; >-2~ i .:'.i II . , I , ~ 22 CI 20 ...-5f--= = W <>-2 '" tz~ > = -Wu. W ::;0 U :z: ~~ :::;) 1.1.1 -.J --, ..,... wO .. > w n A'<I, 1.<L,"'" r---------, , , , , , , , , " , i ' : ! , , , , L _________ ..J I • r--------------, I ~-1 , , : r-J : : • , , , , I I ........... I >-__ l ______________ J o ! II;!'0'<P '<P ;* 0 0 t-.-e " ~' .. l,~~~ .• _. NO!"'" """ "'"0 A.LI:) W"i 1I><l '" I ! ' • ," I zo ~ 0' !i' u ~I :J ~! §I I . , ' . i , ~ I! II ~ -.-! .. ",; :.: t!::: " 1-," , I. w z ~, [L « ::2 ~ ..J [L Ii: o I en ii: « z ::2 ..J W a: [L + , ; ~" "a , I I I I ,; ! \ 1 I " I t I I I , I .:. i .~ -• , .,'," 1.1'.""". .,. r !t ~!:~~I 'il!' ' r" i ~." ~9!~ ~~~ "~~ili~~ , !ljinilj'iil "I '~"~~·i;!: 1,;"I'l,l! , ',I'll' ''''I ' , j' i· I'il" I Ii .j •. II' I ",hij.'l'lii " 3 II : ! "I !1~ ~~~" ~~ ~ . . , I !dilllbil!li , ,,-,'" ) .«,00". ,,, .. 1." ...... 1--"---1 I I I I I I I I I I I I I l I I I I I I I I I i I I I i L _'_"" I I --;;;;;--..;;; -" ~-, I I i, ,I~, ~~"ll ! ill'! • I ! ., . ~.., I 11·1, . Ii, I '" ! ; ,:: ! I I, Ill:, -~~~§! !R 'II • , : .~. I'l ! II Ii • . I Ill" "i Iji .:" I .. ,III i "I i III , 1 hid I ! 11M i ! , , i : I ! ' . , ! I" 0 , • 63 ~ , !<! :l w' ~! O. I cl ! i u~ , , , ~ , ! ~ 1111 f~} • I~( , , ; ", I , ! \. -:. -r' " -!' . \. -0-•• '_ ~ __ ._-,----,,--I ~: .. '" • . I ~ o-~",.Il,~ -l ---~;ii~~'-';~~~;'--~.,-~ T -~::~~-~_':~ I .!n: I --.. --t ----.----.. ---. ---. --.. --.-----. --. --.' ______ . ____ • ______ . __ . ~ .. __ • ___ ) ________ . ____ . __ .. ____ . ~ ---+-_C___ UJ : q , _____ .. L_.~~=~~~~~-.~=~_=~B~-.-~~.~=t=--~~ .. - I NO.LN3" ~ _~O ,UD 'II' l ________ . . z ~- <{ ~i --l I Il... I W CJ <{ z <{ a: 0 :::2 a: ~ I I 0 i· z i <{ CJ z 0 <{ a: CJ I .. I I ------:"',,~,"::': .... - - -;,----------------+--1 , I; ~ ,:~~---- -.,,'----'r---~ "'. ~! I'i < :". , ./ .", '. .:'1. .<" ::-.,: .. '; · -/" .. -'.' . , ,-, ''":'''-. , " .. ~ :H ,[ , , ---.'. -'. : : JJ::i "" ~-1 ~;, .. ' r ~ " '-'. [, "' f5 ,..... --r .,~ I : ". i 'I l}, ' . I , · .' I" '", r). I '", S-.... .r: ! I,h, ' ; <i NT i1I r'· :JJ :t:: Ii I "" ,'-"" ,-' -"" :, ' : I ". §~ '", ~! , ",,' :~ i I I " . I · ; --"i -E ( r',,:/ • '~i I i "i • \ ' . . ; f--~ . I . '1 '", .-III '", ,--i I~ r ~ A 1 Ii ~, " i ; "~ "\ I' .. • " , ~ ~~ '" : ;: "., ~I ~I ~I ! -'-'--1- /. " .\1, .' , [, ,\-~~-::,---, .-" .. .-F;\ ~:;~;:-'~~' . ., --00 . I 1m '. -:; , ~ ';' II , --. ;' ---, ~,~-----, --"1,,;; ... -~ .-J _. -.' • ina ....... u,. 3 N 3A \f S()N('r'j03 i 'j. . . " I . - • ':'-~ -.----~.::...\t,.-J:; -"'"--" -7 -:y-~ .. ;' .. I II gl ~ ~I -_____ L ___________________________________ _ NO.LNml ~ .'1.0 .u.l) W'i o § --~ -, I -----"~-:s II n, , : ! z j (L I (:J z ZZ ~ zo = ~!z = N e-LlJ za: = LlJL<-:;;0 :z ~~ :::> lOCi -, > W 0 NO!N:HI .'10 AJJ:J : I IN : • ! ti~ ~ .! " W' ~ 0 .~ ~I I w 51 I 1 :::: < W ! III! U ~ W i~/ a: " :' ',. I" • I. ~I 'i 1.1", .. ' {,' ~ ~1Ii~ d~ ~!~ ~~~ !l ~Z 'I O~ I ~~ k G~ '1 ~~ ';~' ~~ ~ , ~ , i i~ ,: 'i , TEMPORARY EROSION AND SEDIMENTATION CONTROL NOTES AND DETAILS DEVELOPMENT PLANNING CITY OF RENTON """"" 00Nm0L """" --' .. ~=':'J"."=,,,,_ .. ~ __ --"'--::.0-i;C=:;""":",,...:',~~':.:.=~= a=s."':.7~::='-::"':-..::r..-':iE' :~~~#,,,, ... =.c .. =:~.:-=-::...'.r~ ::"'--==-~-Eru~"':':.;' =.-; .'"I.:§J'.r:-o{:~:=.=:?.J: ~~":.=.n'::'!':...~ =~"; .. ~==~...::'--"'=- ~~=::::-..tr":.'1~r._~ :5'i:~~..::;.J"':;''''':'~''tt''' FLlER FABfIC Fea NJTAUATlON NOlE8 .............. ,...._ .. _-"" .... _'" 3uT=-==~~~-~ ... :::.--- ='::F-=~w~"'~.="'''- • .. ""':.D'-...... "='""_T.:J."="= :.::'.:o:r=-- -~-"""-.~ ... --"""' ..... ~vE~.;1~'l.-..ii:i:-:Et.=- ~~~r-"'''1!..~':=='':,. =~~'£",,'n.'!~~£:f.:~ .. ______ JoI ____ __ =.:r:.. "="-=-.: == ==:r =.:::.13'"'=' '?!5'=..::::.a~~""""':=~::''' ffiY-l1-i ~ C~ ~-'-...... .,~ '::~ I;-Yl:::-;:;;;aa ~- ::"'00:..-:0.. ~ -'::.:'"_.~ .... -AOCK CHECK o.w PETALS "''''''=~1I --r.::;.;""'-. ....... ~ =,..~". " . .-r--&",.:ii£ ::r'=:-"'--J r_---",.=. FI..:rEft FABfIC FENCE PETAl. __ 4~ r_ J . -$~-~~ :""'-\)1 , .. :iI ........ ..--.. .. s=--=r:=: .._-_ ... _----......... -~--.... -.-.-..... -.. ':-':"--:::"'''':''' ... oo;;.:.~~..:.'''''' '"""'""" """"""'" B<TAANCe lSf"'ORAAY 'V' OCTCH '\ --. --., "" .' JUN 1 0 2004 RECEIVED .~ .. ,,~ W: ~'u., CITY OF RENTON ~",.....-..... NT 0:-~"we .... "' .. "'. A3 NVES'n.ENTB LLC. APARTME3iT8 .. , ,. C9 z 2Z 20 -~~ = = _w '" ,CI: = eLL -~O :z: st :::> W J--. ,0 a: (T--'C'--+. '.-.-' : i , ~ iii , r----, , ,-F'-=-=,+-,==c " " " I , -~.-. ... , ...... ~. ftw' '.".0 ••• : , - c' ~, Z~ , « Ii' , " " w z ....J ~, " 0.. ~~ , :, ~ ~~~ , " • :, CI)~ " " , I' , t¥-' , : ! .u:::[l~,;:ir:H~ .. 1 • 9t -:" --1--,--j ------ -U ~ -~ -, : ..,.-~ -. ~ -... " ::::~. --, -l.,~~u.,. ---:clnl.:c... ~ __ _ OIIOf _ _ --' _~~ rJ 3 N 311'1 SONfl~a3 I • L.j?Y - ----------....... ~ -----~--~---=-=-----.---------------------__ -a_ ---------~---_0 - -T---_ -~ _________________ JI II (;! t j L ~:: q , I : ---------' --------------' 89196 '1M 'Y"IM.::tU G'I"'l8~oo.9 SlN:rt1.S3Ni cv NOJ.N:nl ~ dO AJ.[J W'i -----------:--------, {f=-1c--,u, .', ! z ~ " , t ~--!~ I ! , '; I !, "~ rH ; ~~~ __ -~-1'-_ -= __ .':~~UNDS AVE N.E. "~, I -~ --,-,.;-: :1 I,~" --,-... -;1 ~ 1'" I 1'!: __ ~~ =""~, '''l ~_ ; -_ iCC ,:-; Ii d=' , . 50 I r" ... @ .• ~. '. . .. N 0 ~745 E 10~ L-'MOt CONt> SIDEWALK -""'" ':=:-.. '0'.. <;\lQlj<;\lQ]' ,----. ',I - .I .. ";' <. cB I)« Q] <;\l <;\l @ (j) . -'Q,): 1,£ .,:. .... »:-:.»: :-.. 1 ' I" "";. "'r-~:J> :;;Z :;C ,; en -n ':!:J> 9" m " r-:J> Z '" mcrt , ,~,,_ ~ J. ", .. , ..... ~ ,_ \ '1 I to .. , ~J'. : ---,,-; -.1. .. NC " ~!r ';' " ~. N c. ;----->.:-..-.- _ . __ ..1 _______ . NC Oz w~ -~-- -, ~ '~'~~J ,q.: ~5 ~;~ " ~C Oz N~ III .. " " -.~" .. _~_L __ _ "C 5! )",1--- ,/ o " > ~ "0. "ifl;'j !~ , ~ ~ i V'" I .I i :/1 )" 1-" ' .c:=Cl!!!l I ~j /! ,.-,,: ;' 1-,! I;. , .; 'x I 'e .... ~ . .' " " o ", ~ .~~- .' 'C>N4 • V .e, (-. /Y'~ ~<--.-.~ "",-) ',,~; ~~:J tc~~~ ~s~(~t~ gt~a ~ ~,1!>j~ (li2 ~ ~ ~ 0 f;F~@i!'la 6~ll5 !. (,: ,,€~q ~~ ~ :;; 'II i\.~~i"il ~~~ .:; ~ ~ "'t:~ Ii~ ~ <: , m I~ ~ :: n li 'it" ~ il '., 1'< '" ..... ..: = ~.... (. ~..l: I < !.: ~o"l~~~ -~§ c_" '" ~c§: <JlO ~ I" I ;r1{~,q.; ~,~ :;;::; >10 ,,§ r. ~ ~ I "'~ om 0. c,,' -ll. . '" J: '" E!z '" a --r ~i,~Q~~ [0.1 . ~ < ~ -;. 2.... ;; ~ I m -<0 .. Ii; ~ .. "-1;" » -. en ... "~ 'i:'''' ;0 <> -<"1J .llan~~. '<~" '"' >! t"-: ... .i:. f:~ 0, . ...... o~ I "" '" -> • ", 0°' I' , ~ .l-:~ODS -f~~ ";:' ~?-E :t'i' <: ~ m-nm . '1 <J ,,~.J ~""~ "'''' ;:: Iii Z .. ~ .:I."~ Qj" ~O~ "l@.... I _ :0----, ~-";>~ ,J;_~ -t 1;':, o~ -, '< ~ ~~ Hl ~ a h .~ ~ ~ i 9 n~ 9 ~ I m-o i,<!~J~~ :.~; c -~ ~, -,-~ ~ "', c, i m ~r ~ "/(,, '''-'' ~ <>.}t" ~ -I-0 OJ> <>:I-"-oi ?ti." -0 " f:~"·~ n~. ,.", -~ ZZ o ~ -::t" Q Z ~.. " " -.. t --§. Z ~ ~ ~ Q iJ '7-'i' .. ----. --- . -----.. _ ---_ __,:oJ' '" ;'I~ l REVISIONS NASSER AI1MAONIA RONAL. D ... D.' J.QH NSON SHEET TITLE 6 ~ EDMUNDS AVE NE _~~C~I:,~,f.: LANDSCAPE PLAN RENTON. WA ' ...... '·,AO<!O>' ;XJ m (") m <: m C gl~, F:'I U1 :. rn --\ ! .. In II -III --rn II ~<II » II n --\ II -0" ,-II qz II <-c: ::z = N = = ..,. 0 m < om -. :!~ 0';: -nm )J~ m ~-u o~ ZZ Z Z Gl 'II 0" ~Oi :: 0::~~ -~ i ~; " ll~ 31 REVISIONS ;) 6 'i ;'j i!:" '~ ~'i I; ~H~. 1':'; 1& u:~ 1-= ~ • N~~_~R AHMADNi.A EDMUNDS AVE NE RENTON. WA ~\" (j) (Jl U' nO .. ~ p-o riC ~ ~:--\ ~ ::r c::rn .~ ~;l ;. = rn .: II < --=~ QO" .. z "I"'UUUIU II r:t;,.,,.,r-1 n : I Illl II In '.' . , ; (~ OJ :: 1:l'JUUUIR 1 :. 'nnnn . 0' Gl I, II " II II I: I! ;~ I'; I:: i" I) I~ ~ !I !~ ,. '§ .. I 0; ~ ~ I ,..;Ji'l I ~ f ,,'{ ~ i ~tH ~~t 'l~; '! I' ',S I" o· I ~ "', ' .. ~~ h: ~,;~ ,; <:;L' I~ G <(o ~ ~~ .2 10': 34 10' RONALD D. JOHNSON I SHEET TITLE ARCHITECT ,,'''''' """", ,., BLDG IS" W ELEV I"""'~'b """ . . I§ I. ," " I' ~ , Am ~ 1 N I '90l9 ~11111;j;J~C; r' '.-~ i I ! ,1: , i~m]l ·i ' i.§IR~j~ 10.." 1--, ~_~. --,· ......... 1 ~-.-•• - .: .. -, -" :.;.,.;" O~ • ~ ~!' .1 , ~, n 81 , : " ;; , n ~I ! , ~'I l "I " , , I, i ~ !! ~ . >' ! ~ .- l? Z Zz ...-C) 20 :"if-<=> <=> W 0.2 '" > tz~ <=> iIi UJu. :;:0 :z U ~i: :::::> UJ ..J---, a: UJO > LJ.J 0 IH \:- ZONING ',' PIBIPW TBCIINlCAL SERVICES : ! F4 • 17 T23N RSE E 112 - - - -Rental> dity UQ>Jt,I R-8C RM-i o 200 .. 00 t • ..aoo E4 8 T23N R5E E CITY OF RENTON MEMORANDUM Date: July 13, 2004 To: From: Nancy Weil Mike Dotson / Subject: Pazooki Townhouse Short Plat; LUA-04-061, SA-A, SHPL-A, ECF I have reviewed the subject Environmental and Development application. The following are comments related to the environmental impacts, policy, and other code-related comments: Existing Conditions: WATER SEWER STORM STREETS The project site is located in the 435-water pressure zone. Two-inch (2") and sixteen-inch (16") water lines currently exist adjacent to this site. The modeled Fire Flow available to the site is approximately 4800 gpm. Static water pressure is approximately 70 psi. The site is outside the Aquifer Protection Area. The property is currently served by an 8" public sewer line (located within the vacated right-of-way). Surface water conveyance facilities currently exist along the frontage of this site. Edmonds Ave NE site frontage is improved with roadway, curb, gutter, sidewalk and street lighting. The NE 10th Place right of way is currently unimproved. Code Related Comments: WATER 1. City Code requires a System Development Charge (SOC) for all new and re-development. The fee for this mulit-family development is $915.00 per dwelling unit (5-new units X $915 = $4,575.00). 2. The existing 2" water main along NE 10th Place will be required to be replaced with a 10" watermain. New Hydrant(s) and watermeters may be connected to this line. 3. Any existing sub-standard fire hydrants will be required to be upgraded andlor retrofitted with a quick disconnect Storz fitting. 4. If a fire sprinkler system is required, a separate utility permit and separate plans will be required for the installation of the double detector check valve assembly. 5. Due to the single-family nature of the dwelling units, it is highly recommended that the developer install individual water meters to each unit. H:IOlvlslon,sIOevelop.serlDev&plao.ingIPROJECTSI04·061.NancylPazooki green folder.doc SEWER 1. City Code requires a System Development Charge (SDC) for any new development. The fee for this development is $540.00 per dwelling unit (6-new units X $540 = $3,240.00). @ 2. New side-sewer stub-outs are required for each new lot. STORM 1. Surface water System Development Charge (SDC) is required for this site. This fee is $0.249 new impervious area ($0.249 X 8,350 sq ft = $2,076.66). 2. A storm and surface water drainage plan and report (per the 1990 King County Surface Water Manual; see the seven Core requirements) are required. The Technical Information Report analysis submitted with this application has covered all of the Core requirements. 3. Any retaining walls greater than 4 feet in height will need to be reviewed under separate Building permits. A licensed engineer with geo-technical expertise must be retained for proposed rockeries greater than four feet in height. The engineer must monitor rockery construction and verify in writing that the rockery was constructed in general accordance with ARC standards and with his/her supplemental recommendations. STREETSITRANSPORT ATION 1. City Code requires installation of half pavement width on the existing right of way, frontage to the site. The code also requires installing curb, gutter, storm drainage, sidewalk, and street signage along the frontage of the parcel being developed. 2. A Traffic Mitigation Fee of $75.00 per Average Daily Trip shall be assessed. The fee for this development has been calculated at $2,306.25 (according to the 7'h Addition of the ITE Trip Generation Manual). This fee is payable at time of building permit. CONDITIONS The following must be completed prior to recording of the short plat: @ 1. Install new watermain along the frontage of NE 10th Place. 2. Install new Fire Hydrants in accordance with Fire Flow requirements. 3. All new or existing fire hydrants (specifically required for the development) must be fitted with a quick disconnect Storz fitting. ® 4. Provide a separate side sewer stub-out connection to each new building lot. Show easement for sidesewer crossing new north lot on the Short Plat Document. tf) 5. Provide a separate water meter connection for each new building lot (note: it is recommended that each unit have it's own individual water meter). 6. Prior to any construction activities on the site, Temporary Erosion and Sedimentation Control (TESC) shall be installed and maintained to the satisfaction of the representative of the Development Services Division for the duration of the project. 7. A Traffic Mitigation Fee of $75.00 per Average Daily Trip shall be assessed. This fee is payable at time of building permit. H:\Oivision.s\Develop.ser\Oev&plan,ing\PROJECTSI04-061.Nancy\Pazooki green folder.doc City of Renton Department of Planning / Building / Public Works ENVIRONMENTAL & DEVELOPMENT APPLICA TION REVIEW SHEET REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: Plan Revieu) COMMENTS DUE: JULY 9, 2004 APPLICATION NO: LUA-04-061, SA-A, SHPL-A, ECF DATE CIRCULATED: JUNE 25, 2004 APPLICANT: Siavoosh Pazooki PROJECT MANAGER: Nancy Weil PROJECT TITLE: Pazooki Townhouses Short Plat PLAN REVIEW: Mike Dotson SITE AREA: 13,503 square feet BUILDING AREA (qross): 2,646 square feet" .. , I "'un J U iJU'f LOCATION: 972 Edmonds Ave NE WORK ORDER NO: 77264 SUMMARY OF PROPOSAL: An application to divide the existing parcel of 0.31 acres creating two lots each~IW,If'#il.s)s~UB0N feet. The intent 01 the applicant is to develop a 3-unit triplex on each lot with a shared 26-loot wide access easement. The site is zoned Residential Multi-Family Suburban Center with an existing single-family residence to be removed. The proposal will require . reviewJor short. plat, environmental (SEf'A).review and site plan review.. ._. __ . ____________ . __ . ______ _ A. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT (e.g. Non-Code) COMMENTS Element of the Probable Probable M"", Element of the Probable Probable More Environment Minor Major Information Impacts Impacts Necessary Environment Minor Major Information Impacts Impacts Necessary Housin Air Aesthetics Waler LightIGlare Plants Recreation ~use Utilities Transportation Public Services ':.~~~;, Historic/Culturai Preservation Airport Environment 10,000 Feet 14000 Feet B. POLICY-RELATED COMMENTS C. CODE-RELATED COMMENTS . ation with particular attention to those aress in which we have experlise and have identified areas of probable impact or· tion is needed to properly assess this proposal. ._. 7/12/0,/ Date City of h.mton Department of Planning I Building I pUbAorks ENVIRONMENTAL & DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: I ro..( &.-ur~iDV\ COMMENTS DUE: JULY 9, 2004 APPLICATION NO: LUA-04-061, SA-A, SHPL-A, ECF DATE CIRCULATED: JUNE 25, 2004 APPLICANT: Siavoosh Pazooki PROJECT MANAGER: Nancy Weil PROJECT TITLE: Pazooki Townhouses Short Plat PLAN REVIEW: Mike Dotson REce'TVED SITE AREA: 13,503 square feet BUILDING AREA (Qross): 2,646 square feet "'~I 7 II ~nn, •• -... ~""U"T LOCATION: 972 Edmonds Ave NE WORK ORDER NO: 77264 SUMMARY OF PROPOSAL: An application to divide the existing parcel of 0.31 acres creating two lots each with 6;75f.Pd¥~fQN feet. The intent of the applicant is to develop a 3-unit triplex on each lot with a shared 26-foot wide access easement. The site is zoned Residential Multi-Family Suburban Center with an existing single-family residence to be removed. The proposal will require review for short plat, environmental (SEPA) review and site plan review. A. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT (e.g. Non-Code) COMMENTS Element of the Probable Probable More Environment Minor Major Information Impacts Impacts Necessary Earlh Air ~ ~~~::;::, B. POLICY-RELATED COMMENTS C. CODE-RELATED COMMENTS Element of the Environment Probable Minor Impacts Probable Major Impacts More Information Necessary ~~=-----~----r----+----~ ~are We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those BreBS in which we have expertise and have identified areas of probable impact or areas where additiona . arm tion is needed to properly assess this proposal. Signature of Director or Authorized Representative ..- City of Renton Department of Planning / Building / Public Works ENVIRONMENTAL & DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: .5l.JJrto..c.e../ IA/" d, 11 law COMMENTS DUE: JULY 9, 2004 APPLICATION NO: LUA-04-061, SA-A, SHPL-A, ECF DATE CIRCULATED: JUNE 25, 2004 APPLICANT: Siavoosh Pazooki PROJECT TITLE: Pazooki Townhouses Short Plat PLAN REVIEW: Mike Dotson SITE AREA: 13,503 square leet BUILDING AREA (gross): 2,646 square;le'eO R 7nnb LOCATION: 972 Edmonds Ave NE WORK ORDER NO: 77264 SUMMARY OF PROPOSAL: An application to divide the existing parcel 010.31 acres creating two lot;~~~h~lh W,n?I~~uare leet. The intent 01 the applicant is to develop a 3-unit triplex on each lot with a shared 26-loot wide access easement. The site is zoned Residential Multi-Family Suburban Center with an existing sin~le-lamily residence to be removed. The proposal will require review lor.short plat, environmental (SEPA) review and site plan revIew.. . ......... _ .. ___ .. _._ . A_ ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT (e.g_ Non-Code) COMMENTS Element of the Probable Probable More Environment Minor Major Information Impacts Impacts Necessary Earth Air Water Plants Land/Shoreline Use Animals Environmental Health Energy/ Natural Resources L) fLt.--.-.-J ,M/.v,U w .. k--Jl.,...-I..." 'l-) wk ~VM/.I,';~ )) ~ t It; ~ -/lv/.s . vi, ....... qJ • I,.) 1:.-1 .. ) "- B. POLICY-RELATED COMMENTS C. CODE-RELATED COMMENTS Element of the Probable Probable More Environment M;nor Major Information Impacts Impacts Necessary • .~ ·:~:~~ •• t . We have reviewed thi lication with particular attention to those areas in which we have expertise and have identified areas of probable impact or al info ation is needed to properly assess this proposal. r Authorized Representative Date • , \ DATE: TO: FROM: CITY OF RENTON PLANNING/BUILDING/PUBLIC WORKS MEMORANDUM July 12,2004 Nancy Weil Sonja J. FeSSer}~ SUBJECT: Pazooki Townhouses Short Plat, LUA-04-061-SHPL Format and Legal Description Review Bob Mac Onie and I have reviewed the above referenced short plat submittal and have the following comments: Comments for the Applicant regarding the preliminary short plat submittal: The spelling for the street name (Edmonds Ave NE) is incorrect on the preliminary short plat map submittal (Sheet 2 of 7), and on the other six drawings as well. See the attachment for a change to be made to the legal description. Refer to the legal description in "Exhibit A" of the Lawyers Title Agency of Washington Commitment Report, Order No. 357647, dated may 27, 2004, for confirmation of this needed correction. Information needed for final short plat approval includes the following: Note the City of Renton land use action number and land record number, LUA-04-061- SHPL and LND-20-0378, respectively, on the short plat drawing. The type size used for the land record number should be smaller than that used for the land use action number. A licensed surveyor will need to prepare and stamp, sign and date the final short plat drawing(s). Show ties (2) to the City of Renton Survey Control Network. The geometry will be checked when the ties have been provided. Provide short plat and lot closure calculations. \H:\File Sys\LND -Land Subdivision & Surveying Re<:ords\LND-20 -Short Plnl'\\0378\RV040707.doc July 12,2004 Page 2 Include a statement of equipment and procedures used, per WAC 332-130-100. Note the dates the existing monuments were visited, per WAC 332-130-150, and what was found. Indicate what has been, or is to be, set at the corners of the proposed lots. Note discrepancies between bearings and distances of record and those measured or calculated, if any. Note all easements, agreements and covenants of record on the drawing, if any. The city will provide addresses as soon as required. Said addresses need to be noted on the drawing. On the final short plat submittal, remove all references to utility facilities, curb and gutter and other items on the drawing not directly impacting the subdivision. These items are provided only for preliminary short plat approval. For the final submittal, remove the site zoning, setbacks, density, comprehensive plan land use designation and parking requirements from the "SITE DATA" block. The City of Renton Administrator of Planning/Building/Public Works is the only city official who signs this short plat drawing. Provide an appropriate approval block and signature line for him. Provide King County approval blocks as needed. All vested owner(s) of the subject short plat need to sign the final short plat submittal. Include notary blocks as needed. Include a declaration block on the drawing. Note that if there are easements, agreements or restrictive covenants to others (City of Renton, etc.) as part of this subdivision, they can be recorded concurrently with the short plat. The short plat drawing and the associated document(s) are to be given to the Project Manager as a package. The short plat will have the first recording number (recorded by King County). Provide references to the associated document(s), and spaces for the recording number(s) thereof, on the short plat drawing to allow for cross-referencing. Because this property is not to be used for single-family use, but for multi-family use, it might be better to remove the access and utility easement from the short plat drawing. Neither of the two new lots created is landlocked, so access is not an issue, and the easement does not directly impact the subdivision. lithe easement is to be shown on the short plat drawing, the following three paragraphs ill2I2LY: H:\File Sys\LND -Land Subdivision & Surveying Records\LND-20 . Short Plals\0378\RV040707.doc\cor July 12,2004 Page 3 The new private 24' access and utility easement is for the benefit of future owners of the proposed lots. Since the two lots are under common ownership at the time of short plat recording, there can be no new easement established until such time as ownership of the lot(s) is conveyed to others, together with and/or subject to specific easement rights. Add the following Declaration of Covenant language on the face of the subject drawing: DECLARATION OF COVENANT: The owner of the land embraced within this short plat, in return for the benefit to accrue from this subdivision, by signing hereon covenants and agrees to convey the beneficial interest in the new easement shown on this short plat to any and allfuture purchasers of the lots, or of any subdivision thereof This covenant shall run with the land as shown on this short plat. The private access and utility easement requires a "NEW PRN ATE EASEMENT FOR INGRESS, EGRESS & UTILITIES MAINTENANCE AGREEMENT" statement to be noted on the short plat drawing. See the attachment. Fee Review Comments: The Fee Review Sheet for this review of the preliminary short plat is provided for your use and information. Building/construction permits, not the short plat, trigger the fees noted on said fee sheet. H:\File Sys\LND -Land Subdivision & Surveying Rcconls\LND-20 -Short Plals\0378\RV040707.doc\cor • 11'1 -~ b z /4, 10 • MERIDIAN PLAT 1"=10' 5 o 10 20 ----GRAPHIC SCALE IN FEET PROPERTY DESCRIPllON: THAT PORllON OF' THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF' THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF' THE SOUTH\\£sT QUARTER OF' THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF SECllON 9, TOWNSHIP 23 NORTH, RANGE 5 EAST., W.M., DESCRIBED AS FOll.OWS: BEGINNING~~~ ~ST CORNER OF' THE EAST HALF OF SAID SUBDIIIISIO 'AMP?:? ENCE NORTH AlONG THE WEST UNE OF SAID EAST HALF -.--~. THE TRUE POINT OF' BEGINNING OF' THE TRACT; THENCE WEST ALONG A UNE PARAlLEL WITH THE SOUTH UNE OF SAID SUBDIIIISION TO AN INTERSECllON WITH A .. UNE PARAU.a WITH AND 3D F'EET EAST OF' THE WEST UNE OF SAID SlECllON 9; THENCE SOUTH ALONG SAID PARALLa UNE 105 F'EET; THENCE EAST AlONG A UNE PARALLa WITH THE SOUTH UNE OF' SAID SUBDIIilSION TO THE WEST UNE OF THE EAST ONE HALF OF' SAID SUBDIVISION: THENCE NORTH AlONG SAID WEST UNE 105 F'EET TO THE POINT OF' BEGINNING; SITUATE IN THE COUNTY OF' KING, STATE OF WASHINGTON. SUBJECT TO RESERVA llON OF RECORD. ELEVAllONS: REF'ER TO SURVEY CONTROL DATABASIE -POINT 10: 6173. NA VD: 88. BOLT IN SIGNAl FOOllNG. THE MARK IS IN RENTON, AT THE NORTHWEST ANGLE OF THE INTERSlECllON OF SUNSET BLVD AND EDMONDS AVE NE. THE MARK IS THE TOP OF THE BOLT IN THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF THE CONCRETE FOOllNG FOR THE TRAFFIC SIGNAL ELEV. = 282.815 FEET CONTOUR INTERVAl - 2 FOOT SITE DATA SITE ADDRESS: 972 EDMONDS AVE N.E. RENTON, WA TOTAL SITE AREA = 13,737 S.F. = 0.32 AC. PROPOSED NO. OF LOTS -2 PROPOSED AREA OF LOT 1 -6868.5 SF PROPOSED AREA OF LOT 2 -6868.5 SF SITE ZONING: RM-C COMPREHENSIVE PLAN LAND USIE DESIGNA llON: MUL ll-FAMILY INFIll. SElBACKS: FlRONT -20' SIDES -7' (3 STORY HIGH) REAR -15' ......... , ... , ..... , ........ ,,----.--- DEVELOPMENT PLANNIN" CITY OF RENTON Title for both o(the following paragraphs: NEW PRIVATE EASEMENT FOR INGRESS, EGRESS & UTILITIES MAINTENANCE AGREEMENT Use the following paragraph if there are two or more lots participating in the agreement: NOTE: NEW PRIV ATE EXCLUSIVE EASEMENT FOR INGRESS, EGRESS AND UTILITIES IS TO BE CREATED UPON THE SALE OF LOTS SHOWN ON THIS SHORT PLAT. THE OWNERS OF LOTS SHALL HAVE AN EQUAL AND UNDIVIDED INTEREST IN THE OWNERSHIP AND RESPONSllILITY FOR MAINTENANCE OF THE PRIVATE ACCESS EASEMENT APPURTENANCES. THESE APPURTENANCES AND MAINTENANCE RESPONSllILITIES INCLUDE THE REPAIR AND MAINTENANCE OF THE PRIVATE ACCESS ROAD, DRAINAGE PIPES, AND STORM WATER QUALITY AND/OR DETENTION FACILITIES WITHIN THIS EASEMENT, PRIVATE SIGNAGE, AND OTHER INFRASTRUCTURE NOT OWNED BY THE CITY OF RENTON OR OTHER UTILITY PROVIDERS. MAINTENANCE COSTS SHALL BE SHARED EQUALLY. PARKING ON THE PAVING IN THE ACCESS EASEMENT IS PROHllITED, UNLESS PAVEMENT WIDTH IS GREATER THAN 20 FEET. Use the following paragraph if there is one lot subject to the agreement: NOTE: NEW PRIVATE EXCLUSIVE EASEMENT FOR INGRESS, EGRESS AND UTILITIES IS TO BE CREATED UPON THE SALE OF LOTS SHOWN ON THIS SHORT PLAT. THE OWNER OF LOT . SHALL HAVE OWNERSHIP AND RESPONSllILITY FOR MAINTENANCE OF THE PRIVATE ACCESS EASEMENT APPURTENANCES. THESE APPURTENANCES AND MAINTENANCE RESPONSIBILITIES INCLUDE THE REPAIR AND MAINTENANCE OF THE PRIV ATE ACCESS ROAD, DRAINAGE PIPES, AND STORM WATER QUALITY AND/OR DETENTION FACILITIES WITHIN THIS EASEMENT, PRIVATE SIGN AGE, AND OTHER INFRASTRUCTURE NOT OWNED BY THE CITY OF RENTON OR OTHER UTILITY PROVIDERS. MAINTENANCE COSTS SHALL BE SHARED EQUALLY. PARKING ON THE PAVING IN THE ACCESS EASEMENT IS PROHllITED, UNLESS PAVEMENT WIDTH IS GREATER THAN 20 FEET. PROPERTY SERVICE' 'E REVIEW FOR SUBDMSIONS No.7 APPLICANT: '1?AZO?k' I , 51AYOoeo!:-l (A3 Ili\tp""""jlv1Ebrp? I I C) RECEIVEDFROM ____ =-=_ (date) NATUREOFWORK:-.,;. ( Mid T,;wr:ti'~ LND# co-a-aS JOB ADDRESS: 97; ~~ ~ ~ -r)WO# 77PG4 X PRELIMINARY REVIEW OF SUBDIVISION BY ONG PLAT, NEED MORE INFORMATION: -LEGAL DESCRIPTION SHORT PLAT, BINDING SITE PLAN, ETC. PID #'s VICINITY MAP -FINAL REVIEW OF SUBDIVISION, Tms REVIEW REPLACES SQUARE FOOTAGE -OTHER PRELIMINARY FEE REVIEW DATED FRONT FOOTAGE SUBJECT PROPERTY PARENT PID# 092505-9151 ')( NEW KING CO. TAX ACCT.#(s) are required when assigned by King County. It is the intent of this development fee analysis to put the. developer/owner on notice. that the fees quoted below may be applicable to the subject site upon development of the property. All quoted fees are potential charges that may be due and payable at the rime the construction permit is issued to install the on~site and off-site improvements (i.e. underground utilities. street improvements, etc.) Triggering mechanisms for the SOC fees will be based on current City ordinances and determined by the applicable Utility Section. Please note that these fees are subject to change without notice. Final fees will be based on rates in effect at time of Building Permit/Construction Pennit application. The existing house on SP Lot # , addressed as has not previously paid ---:-,-------0 SDC fees, due to connection to City utilities prior to existance of SDC fee Ord. SP LotH will be subject to future SDC fees if triggering mechanisms are touched within current City Ordinances. We understand that this subdivision is in the preliminary stage and that we will have the opportunity to review it again before recordation. The followin£ Quote d ~ NOT . ~ I· ~ !h f ees do mclude inspection ees, Side sewer permits, r w permit ees or e cost 0 water meters. SPECIAL ASSESSMENT DISTRICT PARCEL METIIODOF ASSESSMENT ASSESSMENT DISTRICTS NO. NO. ASSESSMENT UNITS OR FEE Latecomer Agreement (pvt) WATER -0- Latecomer Agreement (pvt) W ASTEW A TER -0- Latecomer Agreement (pvt) OTlIER -0 - / Special Assessment Districtl\V A TER '/-0- / Special Assessment District/W ASTEW ATER /-0- Joint Use Agreement (METRO) - Local Improvement District • Traffic Benefit Zones $75.00 PER TRIP, CALCULATED BY TRANSPORTATION - FUTURE OBLIGATIONS 1 1 - SYSTEM DEVELOPMENT CHARGE -WATER .. Estimated # OF UNITSI SDC FEE .. Pd Prevo .. Partially Pd (Ltd Exemotion) Never Pd SQ. FTG. Single family residcntial $1,52S/unit x Mobile home dwelling unit $1220/unit in park . Apartment, Condo $91S/unit not in CD or COR zones x !'S ~4 575.00 Commercial/Industrial, $0.213/sq. ft. of property (not less than $1,525.00) x Boeing, by Special AgreementlFootprim of Bldg plus 15 ft perimeter (2,800 GPM threshold) SYSTEM DEVELOPMENT CHARGE -WASTEWATER·· Estimated -Pd Prevo -Partially Pd (Ltd Exemption) .. Never Pd Sin~le family residential $900/unit x Mobile home dwelling unit $720/ullit x Apartment, Condo $540/unit not in CD or COR zones x C;; $ C3.24D.n:l CommerciaUlndustrial $0.126/sq. ft. of property X(lIot less than $900.00) SYSTEM DEVELOI'MENT CHARGE -SURF ACEW ATER Estimated -Pd Prevo .. PartiallyPd (Ltd Exemption) Never Pd Single family residential and mobile home dwelling unit $71S/unit x All other properties $0.249/sq ft of new impervious area of property x e,Mo sq.!=! . $iC,07c<..~ (not less than $715.00) f-JEMt 1MPE:RvIOLJe> ARE:,6... = 1 PRELIlIIINARY TOTAL $ ~ ~ 9,e,qI.GG -Ub11rn;,,) n..-d~ 7/J4f'-A-'< '" • 0 • 0 h Signaturtj Rcvi{jihg AuthorilY DIHE ... , h .. *If subject propcrty is within an LID, it is devclol)CrS responsibility to check ,,,,jth the Finance Dcpt. for paid/un·paid status . • ~ < .. ". Square footage figures are t~lken from the King County Assessor's map and are subject to change. • • .. Current City SHC fcc charges apply to p 0 EFFECTIVE January 1, 2004 '* l=El::'C:> 10 13E: --rR I C:;;GjE~E::b ""6'( "PUeLIC WoR k:::. '0 '5l.J I U:::>I ~ / CbIJ.E!>1Rt..JepOL..l """f'ERMIT'b -..!:::!Qr THE &HoFrf "PLAT. City of Renton Department of Planning / Building / Public Works ENVIRONMENTAL & DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: P(Dt'b ... .L I SVC£,. COMMENTS DUE: JULY 9, 2004 APPLICATION NO: LUA-04-061, SA-A, SHPt:'A, ECF DATE CIRCULATED: JUNE 25, 2004 ~ ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~-----+~~~~~~~~~~~--~ ;(!~., APPLICANT: Siavoosh Pazooki PROJECT MANAGER: Nancv Weil PROJECT TITLE: Pazooki Townhouses Short Plat PLAN REVIEW: Mike Dotson JUN 'J .. ., CD SITE AREA: 13,503 square feet BUILDING AREA (gross): 2,646 square feef!!"y (') U <'004 LOCATION: 972 Edmonds Ave NE WORK ORDER NO: 77264 -'<Il"Y.s~'tIV!"n. SUMMARY OF PROPOSAL: An application to divide the existing parcel of 0.31 acres creating two lots each with 6,751.5 s~~e feet. The intent of the applicant is to develOp a 3-unit triplex on each lot with a shared 26-foot wide access easement. The site is zoned Residential Multi-Family Suburban Center with an existing sin~le-family residence to be removed. The proposal will require review for short plat, environmental {SEPAl review and.site.plan revIew. " " ___ ' ,_ , __ A_ ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT (e-9-Non-Code) COMMENTS Element of the Probable Probable More Element of the Probable Probable More Environment Minor Major Information Environment Minor Major Information Impacts Impacts Necessary Impacts Impacts Necessary "'h Housing Aesthetics 'ater LightIGlare 'ants Recreation Use Utilities nimals Transportation N~ealth Public Services Historic/Cultural Preservation Airport Environment 10,000 Feet 14 ()()O Feet B. POLICY-RELA TED COMMENTS C_ CODE-RELA TED COMMENTS We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas in which we have expertise and have identified areas of probable impact or areas where additional information is needed to properly assess this proposal. Signature of Director or Authorized Representative Date CITY OF RENTON ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT NEIGHBORHOODS, AND STRATEGIC PLANNING MEMORANDUM DATE: TO: FROM: STAFF CONTACT: SUBJECT: July 9, 2004 Susan Fiala RebJtAtinct Don Erickson Pazooki Six-Unit Project, 972 Edmonds Ave NE; LUA-04-06J, SA-A, SHPL-A, ECF Staff commented on this project on February 13, 2004 and did not support the application as then proposed. The site is zoned RM-C but is just outside of the Centers Residential Bonus District. Part of staffs reluctance to support the applicant's previous submittal had to do with the lack of "definitive submittal materials" such as building elevations and landscape plan which have now been provided. Whereas the applicant previously intended to short plat the subject site into six lots, staff noted that there were no provisions in the code for "zero lot line" developments. The applicant's current proposal is to plat the 13,503 square foot site into two lots, with a three- story, three-unit building on each lot. The two buildings appear to be well articulated using a combination of modulation and different exterior materials. Private entries are provided at ground level off the parking court, which is shared by the two proposed lots. Since there is no planted landscaping associated with the parking court which the front entries face upon and share with incoming and outgoing vehicles, staff urge the applicant to consider using decorative interlocking pavers or stamped paving in this area to make these entries less utilitarian while conveying to motorists that it is both a pedestrian as well as a vehicular area. Recommendation: Support this proposed two-lot short plat with joint use ingress and egress easements. cc: Don Erickson Documcnt2\cor CITY OF RENTON ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT NEIGHBORHOODS, AND STRATEGIC PLANNING MEMORANDUM DATE: February 13, 2004 TO: Susan Fiala FROM: Rebe~~1 STAFF CONTACT: Don Erickson SUBJECT: Pazooki Project, 972 Edmonds Avenue NE; PRE 04-014 The applicant is proposing to develop a 13,503 square foot site with two duplexes each containing three units. The applicant has stated that their intent is to develop the triplexes as three townhouse units each and then to short plat the development into six lots so that each unit has its own identifiable tax lot. The .31 acre site is designated Multi-family Infill on the Comprehensive Plan Land Use Map and zoned RM-C. It appears that the applicant intends to locate parking beneath the units with the living are above. The proposed townhouses would be approximately 33-feet square under this proposal. A common access road would divide the two three unit buildings. The subject site is located to the west of District C of thc Suburban and Neighborhood Center Residential Bonus Districts. Attached are relevant land usc policies. Analysis: Whereas it would be legal to short plat the site into six lots assuming each tax lot had bOlla fide access, minimum width and appropriate turnarounds, it would not now be legal to build zero lot line townhouses in this zone since lots would have to be at least 6S-feet deep and have a minimum IS-foot deep rear yard and 20 foot deep front yard. Except in the RM-T zone lots less than 50 feet in width are required to have side yard setbacks of at least 5-feet. Since the applicant's proposal shows only II-foot rear yards, zero setback between attached buildings, anc! II-foot front yards, it does not appear that the applicant's proposal for townhouses on zero setback side lot lines is feasible. Recmnmendation: Do not support this application as currently proposed. The applicant should be encouraged to provide more definitive submittal materials such as building elevations and typical unit floor plans when they resubmit. Attachment cc: Don Erickson Pazooki Project, 972 Edrnvllcls Avenue; PRE 04-014 Relevant Comprehensive Plan Land Use Policies Residential \VI ulli-family - I nfill: Policy LU-65, New development in Residential Multi-family lnfill designations should be compatible in size, scale, bulk, use, and design with other existing multifamily developments. 2 Policy LU-66. Design standards should be applied that reflect present development patterns and are sensitive to unique features and differences among established neighborhoods. Standards should address, but not be limited to: 1) building height, width, and length; 2) front, side, and rear yard setbacks; 3) maximum lot coverage; 4) location of driveways, garages, and parking areas; 5) number of garages and off-site parking spaces; 6) roofline; (md 7) compatibility with adjacent use,,:. Policy LU-67, Siting and design of new structures should be sensitive to site constraints and adjacent ·uses. Provision of adequate buffers or setbacks or scaling down building heights may be required to transition from Residential Multi-family InfiU designations to adjacent lower density lises. Poiicy LU-68, Adequate green spaces, recreation, design amenities, signing and lighting should be determined as part of the site planning process. Allowable densities should be based Oil meeting these objectives. Community Design: Policy LU-305, The design of buildings and surrounding environment should be compatible with surrounding recent urban design, Policy LU-307. Ensure that development relates, connects, and contillues design quality and site functions from parcel to parcel. Policy LU-30S. Rooftops should be designed to be visually atlraClive where they (ire visible from adjacent buildings or roadways. \\DAEDALUS\S YS2\St I A RED\EDN SP\intcl dep;}! t llIe1l1al\!)evl' lopnlt'llt Revicw\P1 eapps\C( lInmenls\Rl\ 11\Pazonk i M 11 Ili-fnmi Iy ProjccLdoc\d City of Renton Department of Planning / Building / Public Works ENVIRONMENTAL & DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: lC.onorolC 'Ie.v. COMMENTS DUE: JULY 9, 2004 APPLICATION NO: LUA-04-061, SA-A, SHPL-A, ECF DATE CIRCULATED: JUNE 25,2004 ~~.-APPLICANT: Siavoosh Pazooki PROJECT MANAGER: Nancy Weil ,"0,--'1 PROJECT TITLE: Pazooki Townhouses Short Plat PLAN REVIEW: Mike Dotson • JI J N ? II "'1nJ -·v SITE AREA: 13,503 square leet BUILDING AREA (qross): 2,646 square lep.! LOCATION: 972 Edmonds Ave NE WORK ORDER NO: 77264 NEIGHBORHOODS . AND STRATEGIC PlANNINr-; SUMMARY OF PROPOSAL: An application to divide the existing parcel 01 0.31 acres creating two lots each with 6,751.5 square leet. The intent 01 the applicant is to develop a 3-unit triplex on each lot with a shared 26-loot wide access easement. The site is zoned Residential Multi-Family Suburban Center with an existing single-Iamily residence to be removed. The proposal wilt require . ____ ._ review lor. short plat, environmental (SEPA) . review and site plan review ... ___ .. . ...... _ .•.. ___ ... _. . __ . _ .. A. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT (e_g_ Non-Code) COMMENTS Element of the Probable Probable More Element of the Probable Probable More Environment Minor Major Information Impacts Impacts Necessary Environment Minor Major Information Impacts Impacts Necessary ,nh lou,'o, ·at.r ~ ies arB ants ~. Us. ':Fa~u~:, 'tilitie, '!~ A~,,?"..,!: . :~:~g~::: B. POLICY-RELATED COMMENTS C, CODE-RELATED COMMENTS We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas ;n which we have expertise and have identified areas of probable impact or areas where additional information is needed to properly assess this proposaf. Signature of Director or Authorized Representative Date City of Renton Department of Planning / Building / Public Works ENVIRONMENTAL & DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: (1_ ~\:.uJCY\ 5\lS, COMMENTS DUE: JULY 9, 2004 APPLICATION NO: LUA-04-061. SA-A. SHPL-A. ECF DATE CIRCULATED: JUNE 25. 2004 APPLICANT: Siavoosh Pazooki PROJECT MANAGER: Nancy Weil PROJECT TITLE: Pazooki Townhouses Short Plat PLAN REVIEW: Mike Dotson R E C"ftVE D SITE AREA: 13.503 square feet BUILDING AREA (gross): 2.646 square feet II JU ? II .. nn. -_., ....... ,"\IV,. LOCATION: 972 Edmonds Ave NE WORK ORDER NO: 77264 SUMMARY OF PROPOSAL: An application to divide the existing parcel of 0.31 acres creating two lots each witt;'6~YJ~g BiY..IItiON feet. The intent of the applicant is to develop a 3-unit triplex on each lot with a shared 26-foot wide access easement. The site is zoned Residential Multi-Family Suburban Center with an existing sinple-family residence to be removed. The proposal will require review for short plat. environmental (SEPAl review and site plan review. A. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT (e.g. Non-Code) COMMENTS Element of the Probable Probable More Element of the Probable Probable More Environment Minor Major Information Environment Minor Major Information Impacts Impacts Necessary Impacts Impacts Necessary Earth Housin Air Aesthetics Water Li MIG/are Plants Recreation LancVShoreline Use Utilities Animals Transportation Environmental Health Public Services Energy/ Historic/Cuftural Natural Resources Preservation Airporl Environment 10,000 Feet 14,000 Feet B. POLICY-RELATED COMMENTS C. We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas in which we have expertise and have identified areas of probable impact or areas whefi additional information is needed to properly assess this proposal. Date '. City of Renton Department of Planning I Building I Public Works ENVIRONMENTAL & DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: Fire... COMMENTS DUE: JUb-v , A04, 1\ lin fC': r;:::::'\ APPLICATION NO: LUA-04-061, SA-A, SHPL-A, ECF DATE CIRCULATED\\SO~E ).; oil, I.f, U J .1::=... \ \ APPLICANT: Siavoosh Pazooki PROJECT MANAGEAi ~Acv Weil II I PROJECT TITLE: Pazooki Townhouses Short Plat PLAN REVIEW: Mike' [J",Mth, JUN 2 'J ZUULf t.::..I SITE AREA: 13.503 square feet BUILDING AREA (qro s): 2, ~6 ,.< t LOCATION: 972 Edmonds Ave NE WORK ORDER NO: ' \7264 _~j ~ Y_ u: I,,\C!~ I '-'" ~ FiRE OEPARlr.IOH_ SUMMARY OF PROPOSAL: An application to divide the existing parcel of 0,31 acres creating Iwo lois each with 6.751,5 square feet. The intent of the applicant is to develop a 3-unit triplex on each lot with a shared 26-foot wide access easement. The site is zoned Residential Multi-Family Suburban Center with an existing single-family residence to be removed. The proposal will require . __ .. ' ___ review for. short. plat, environmental .(SEPA) review. and site plan.review._, _ ... __ .. _"'_. ___ ..... _. .. _. -.. _. __ _ A. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT (e.g, Non-Code) COMMENTS Element of the Probable Probable More Environment Minor Major Information Impacts Impacts Necessary Earth Air Water Plants LancVShoreline Use Animals Environmental Health Energy/ Natural Resources B. POLICY-RELATED COMMENTS C. CODE-RELA TED COMMENTS ./' e; Cu 0... D >r1 f'/1.£ 11 ~ Element of the Environment Probable Minor Impacts Probable Major Impacts More Information Necessary We have reviews thiS application with a ular attention to those areas In which we have expertise and have identified areas of probable impact or areas where (l,t nal information IS ne d to properly assess this proposal. ~htJ ki or or Authorized e Date 7 • DATE: TO: FROM: SUBJECT: CITY OF RENTON FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU MEMORANDUM June 30, 2004 Nancy Weil, Planner ()j Jim Gray, Assistant Fire MarshalJ~ Pazooki Townhouses Short Plat, J{; Edmonds Ave. NE MITIGATION ITEMS; 1. A fire mitigation fee of $2,328.00 is required based on $388.00 per unit. FIRE CODE REQUIREMENTS: 1. The preliminary fire flow is 2250 GPM, one hydrant is required within 150 feet of the structures and two additional hydrants are required within 300 feet of the structures. 2. Separate plans and permits are required for the installation of sprinkler and fire alarm systems. 3. Fire department access roads are required to be 20 feet in width and paved. 4. Street address shall be visible from the public street. Please feel free to contact me if you have any questions. City of Renton Department of Planning I Building I Public Works ENVIRONMENTAL & DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: Pa.r1L6 COMMENTS DUE: JULY 9, 2004 APPLICATION NO: LUA-04-061, SA-A, SHPL-A, ECF DATE CIRCULATED: JUNE 25, 2004 APPLICANT: Siavoosh Pazooki PROJECT MANAGER: Nancv Weil PROJECT TITLE: Pazooki Townhouses Short Plat PLAN REVIEW: Mike Dotson SITE AREA: 13,503 square feet BUILDING AREA (qross): 2,646 square feet LOCATION: 972 Edmonds Ave NE I WORK ORDER NO: 77264 SUMMARY OF PROPOSAL: An application 10 divide the existing parcel of 0.31 acres creating two lots each with 6,751.5 square feet. The intent of the applicant is to develop a 3-unit triplex on each lot with a shared 26-foot wide access easement. The site is zoned Residential Multi-Family Suburban Center with an existing single-family residence to be removed. The proposal will require review for short plat, environmental (SEPA) review and site plan review. J A_ ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT (e.9-Non-Code) COMMENTS Element of the Probable Probable More Element of the Probable Probable More Environment Minor Major Information Impacts Impacts Necessary Environment Minor Major Information Impacts Impacts Necessary Earth Air Nater 'Iants Use UtiJities !~t ~ -;~';,; ;,,; B. POLICY-RELATED COMMENTS C. CODE-RELA TED COMMENTS ~.C(AJv IU) ~ads 10 ~h, We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas In which we have expertis9 and have identified areas of probable Impact or areas where additional inlonnat' is needed to properly assess this proposal. & I~ 104 Sig Aut orized Representative =D':::at:"'ElF..!.~-4'-"'-+------- , ~y ~~~ ~~~ tfN't° NOTICE OF APPLICATION AND PROPOSED DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE -MITIGATED (DNS-M) DATE: LAND use NUMBER: PROJECT NAME: JUNE 28, 2004 LUA04-061, SA-A, SHPL·A, ECF PAZOOKI TOWNHOUSES SHORT PLAT PROJECT DESCRIPTION: All applleallon 10 dlvldl the ulll!n" parcel of 0.31 8e,.., 1;>, .. llnll two loll each wllh 6,751.5 .qu .... leel. The Intent olth .. 'ppllcant I. to davlliop. 3_un1l trlpl&X on Nch lot with a ,har.d 26-loot wide .cc .... n.m.nt. The Iitl I. zoned R .. ldanU.1 Multl-F.mlly Suburban Cent ... wllh an ul,Ung Ilng ... lamlly ... Idanca 10 ~ ramond. The pro"o'" will noqul ...... vlew lor .hor! plat, .nvlronmental (SEPA) revl.w and Ilta pl.n ... vllw. PROJECT LOCATION: 1172 EDMONDS AVENUE NE OPTIONAL DErrERMINATlON OF NOl'f.S/GNlFJCANCE, MIT1GATED (DNS-M): As tha Lead AlO'8r\Oy, Ihe Clly 01 Renton has determined thet significant 9!lvlronm",ntal Impacts are unlikely to reau" Irom Ihe p."oposed p."ojecl. Therelore, as permmed under the RCW 43.21C.ll0, the City 01 Renlon Is using the Opllon.ell DNS·M process 10 give notien that a DNS· M ~ likely \0 be lsaued. Comment periodS lor Iha project and the propos(ld DNS·M are Inlegrel(ld Into a Single comment period. Thar", will be no comment penod following the ,ssuaf>CfI 01 the Threshold Detarmlnatlon of Noo·SIgnIIJcence· MttigatOJd (ON5-M). A 14-day appeal pe~od will tollow thals5uonc .. 01 the DNS·M. PERMIT APPLICATION DATE: JUNE to. 201)4 NOT1CE OF COMPLETE APPLICATION: JUNE 29, 2004 APPUCANTIPROJECT CONTACT PERSON: OMIEO PAZOOKI TEL: (425) 229-7001 PermltaiRavlaw Requ .. ,tad: Envlronmentsl (SEPA) Ravl.w, Sit. Pllln Approval Oth.r Pannlt. which may" r.qulrad: Building Permits, Fire Permits Requaltad Studt": NIA Location wh .... application may be ... vlewed: PllnnlnglbultdlnWPublic Work. Department, O.velopmant Sarvlce, Dlvlalon, Sixth Floor Ranton City Hall, 1055 South O ... dy Way, Ranlon, WA 9B055 CONSISTENCY OVERVIEW: Land U .. : EnvJronmanbll Documant, thaI EVlluate tha PropOled ProlKt; Dav,lopmant Rigulation. U,ed For ProJKI Mltlg.tlon: Pro"oled MlIlgation M ... ur .. : Residential mulli·lamlty suburban center (RM'C) The project 1'11111 be subject to the C"Y"' SEPA Qrdinaf>CfI, Zoning COde, CrilJcal AlMS Regulations. Public Work. Standllrds. Unilorm Building Coda, Unllorm Fira Coda and other applicable codes end regulations a8 apprO$lrlllte. 1. The applicant wlU be r&qulred to pay the approprlsl& Fire MIUgat~n fee basOJd on $3BB.00 per each muR~fsmlly unit. 2. The applicant will be required 10 pay the appropriate Par~8 MRigatlon lee based on $354.51 per each muK~lamlly Unit. 3. The applicant 1'11111 be require<! to pay !he approprlato TransporlaHon Mitigation fee based on $75.00 por net naw average dally Irlp allrlbul(ld to the prolect. 4. Temporary Erosion end Sedimentation Control M88$uI8$ shell be inslslled and maintained to the satisfaction ot tho representatlvB of the DovE/topmant SE/rvices Division for the duration 01 the project. , Commeots on the above application must be subm~teod In wrtIlng \0 Nancy WaH, Auociate Plamar, Development ServicEta Division, 1055 South Grady Way, Renton, WA 93055, by 5:00 PM on July 9, 2004. II you have qU<lstions about this propo:sal, or wish to be made a party ~ record and receive additional no@cation by ma~. contact the Project Manager. :::::~~ submll$ written comments will autom&Ucal~ become a porty 01 record and will be nolffHld of any decision on CONTACT PERSON: NANCY WElL TEL: (425) 430-7270 PLEASE INCL.UDE THE PROJECT NUMBER WHEN CALLING FOR PROPER FILE IOENTlFrCATION " 0 rr It you would like to be made a party 01 record to receive lurther information on thla proposed project, complele thiS form and return to: City of Renton, Development Planning, 1055 So. Grady Way, Renton, WA 98055. File NolName; LUA04-061, SA-A, SHPL·A, ECF f Pazookl Townhouses Short Plat NAME; ________________________________________________ ___ ADDRESS: ____________________ _ TEl.EPHONE NO.: _________ _ ... ,~\~'b~l)~-. ~ 0:.. .... ..,.,,,l .... , CERTIFICATION .... -,~~ ...... ''''1R ... · "~I _ -~ ........ "'C' " .f~ ~~ .. ~sSIO~i;..:: .. ~ '" .. ~ .. ~ \ """1".o6.\~~ f :"8 ~OTA" ~\"1\ ~ ". ~Tr \'fl. , ~ : ~.~~: ~ f) J ".// '7 ~. '" ., I, ~fR(... \, <> ru".y, , hereby-certify that -) copie~ ~tre UaLle .:' j above document were posted by me in ~ conspicuous places on ~""~lt~J!'9.0; , ..• ·f...0~.i the described property on . .) \0 n ( J.-'j ,:),00 L-j ', .... o""·W·~·s·"'\~~.~--'" '"' ............ ,,\""', ..... Sig~q).~~~~~~rf ATTEST: Subscribed~~~~r'JJ!;f':.'e me, a Not~blic. in a d ~ Washington reSid~ , on Ihe"J...!!::. day of-"-..,...:....,.,~I-""""""'--''---__ . MARilYN KAMCHEFF MY A1'1'OIIfflm /iXP!IlfS 6~29~07 ...... ' . I. . ..•..... .. v .. ,.., '., .'., .. , ., ... , .',. '. ,.CITYOFRENTON . .•.. ,. . ' ...... ',CURR,ENT PLANNING DIy'ISION ',', ",,' ...... ','., , ... AF'FII)~YIT:()F SERVICE.BX'I'JIAILING .,' ... " ' .. '. ... . ··,,,,,v, ., ... , ... ' .' .. On the 28th day of June, 2004, I deposited in the mails of the United States, a sealed envelope containing Notice of Application documents. This information was sent to: ... Name Represehtlha Agencies See Attached ~ ~""""'" . -n/J.~ , A /J , ~~" 'IN KA";"t (Signature of Sender): /I'~ _.J'$'\,; ........... C'..c~IIII ? ;' ,oJ ... ~SSI0N i":~ I. : ~ .. ~ :.rA)\ -'(\ " STATE OF WASHINGTON ) f 18 ~OTA09}-~\ "\'I ~ ) ss ~ : C-.<:t (J): ~ ~·~'''u :: COUNTY OF KING ) .. w;. \ BUG.:; ~"'" .'~'" ~"'~'29,OI .... ,,0.: I certify that I know or have satisfactory evidence that Stacy M. Tucker I", O,;· ...... ;.\~~ __ .J' signed this instrument and acknowledged it to be his/her/their free and voluntary a~t'~~~s and purposes mentioned in the instrument. Dated: "11oqloy C---Jn~ ~ ~--lL~ NOPUbl(ciana?oiti1es4Owashington Notary (Print):. ____ -tMAR_ ... ILYN"""'KA .. M""'C~H;;;,EFFim",...."II'r'"---------. -M't ~~~OiN i MEN i EXPIRES 6=29.01 My appointment expires: ,".' ... , . ''''.; Pro/ect·Name: ',..,., ., -~. -. -.----, , Pazooki Townhouses Short Plat ;Pr?I~Qt~umpe!r LUA04-061, SA-A, SHPL-A, ECF template· affidavit of seNiee by mailing Dept. of Ecology' Environmental Review Section PO Box 47703 Olympia, WA 98504-7703 WSDOT Northwest Region' Attn: Ramin Pazooki King Area Dev. Serv., MS-240 PO Box 330310 Seattle, WA 98133-9710 US Army Corp. of Engineers' Seattle District Office Attn: SEPA Reviewer PO Box C-3755 Seattle, WA 98124 Jamey Taylor' Depart. of Natural Resources PO Box 47015 Olympia, WA 98504-7015 KC Dev. & Environmental Servo Attn: SEPA Section 900 Oakesdale Ave. SW Renton, W A 98055-1219 Metro Transit Senior Environmental Planner Gary Kriedt AGENCY (DOE) LETTER MAILING (ERe DETERMINATIONS) WDFW -Stewart Reinbold' Muckleshoot Indian Tribe Fisheries Dept. c/o Department of Ecology • 3190 160th Ave SE Attn. SEPA Reviewer Bellevue, WA 98008 39015 -1720d Avenue SE Auburn, WA 98092 Duwamish Tribal Office' Muckleshoot Cultural Resources Program 4717W Marginal Way SW • Seattle, WA 98106-1514 Attn: Ms Melissa Calvert 39015 172" Avenue SE Auburn, WA 98092-9763 KC Wastewater Treatment Division' Office of Archaeology & Historic Environmental Planning Supervisor Preservation* Ms. Shirley Marroquin Attn: Stephanie Kramer 201 S. Jackson ST, MS KSC-NR-050 PO Box 48343 Seattle, WA 98104-3855 Olympia, WA 98504-8343 City of Newcastle City of Kent Attn: Mr. Micheal E. Nicholson Attn: Mr. Fred Satterstrem, AICP Director of Community Development Acting Community Dev. Director 13020 SE 720d Place 220 Fourth Avenue South Newcastle, WA 98059 Kent, WA 98032-5895 Puget Sound Energy City of Tukwila MuniCipal Liason Manager Steve Lancaster, Responsible Official Joe Jainga 6300 Southcenter Blvd. 201 South Jackson Street KSC-TR-0431 PO Box 90868, MS: XRD-01W Tukwila, WA 98188 Seattle W A 98104-3856 Bellevue, WA 98009-0868 Seattle Public Utilities Real Estate Services Eric Swennson 700 Fifth Avenue, Suite 4900 Seattle, WA 98104-5004 Note: If the Notice of Application states that it is an "Optional DNS", the marked agencies and cities will need to be sent a copy of the checklist, PMT's, and the notice of application .• Also note, do not mail Jamey Taylor any of the notices she gets hers from the web. Only send her the ERC Determination paperwork. template -affidavit of service by mailing NOTICE OF APPLICATION AND PROPOSED DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE -MITIGATED (DNS-M) DATE: LAND USE NUMBER: PROJECT NAME: JUNE 28, 2004 LUA04-061, SA-A, SHPL-A, ECF PAZOOKI TOWNHOUSES SHORT PLAT PROJECT DESCRIPTION: An application to divide the existing parcel of 0.31 acres creating two lots each with 6,751.5 square feet. The Intent 01 the applicant Is to develop 8 3-unlt triplex on 8ach lot with 8 shared 26-100t wide access easement. The site Is zoned Residential Multi-Family Suburban Center with an existing single-family residence to be removed. The proposal will require review for short plat, environmental (SEPA) review and site plan review. PROJECT LOCATION: 972 EDMONDS AVENUE NE OPTIONAL DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE, MITIGATED (DNS-M): As Ihe Lead Agency, Ihe Cily 01 Renlim has determined that significant environmental impacts are unlikely to rasult from the proposed project. Therefore, as permitted under the RCW 43.21 C.l1 0, the City of Renton is using the Optional DNS-M process to give notice that a DNS- M is likely to be issued, Comment periods for the project and the proposed DNS-M are integrated into a single comment period. There will be no comment period following the issuance of the Threshold Determination of Non-Significance- Mitigated (DNS-M). A 14-day appeal period will follow the issuance of the DNS-M. PERMIT APPLICATION DATE: NOTICE OF COMPLETE APPLICATION: JUNE 10, 2004 JUNE 28, 2004 APPLICANT/PROJECT CONTACT PERSON: OMIED PAZOOKI TEL: (425) 229-7001 Permits/Review Requested: Other Permits which may b~ required: Requested Studies: Location where application may be reviewed: CONSISTENCY OVERVIEW: Land Use: Environmental Documents that Evaluate the Proposed Project: Development Regulations Used For Project Mitigation: Proposed MItigation Measures: Environmental (SEPA) Review, Site Plan Approval Building Permits, Fire Permits N/A Planning/Building/Public Works Department, Development Services Division, Sixth Floor Renton City Han, 1055 South Grady Way, Renton, WA 98055 Residential multi-family suburban center (RM-C) N/A The project will be subject to the City's SEPA Ordinance, Zoning Code, Critical Areas Regulations, Public Works Standards, Uniform Building Code, Uniform Fire Code and other applicable codes and regulations as appropriate. 1. The applicant will be required to pay the appropriate Fire Mitigation fee based on $388.00 per each multi-family unit. 2. The applicant will be required to pay the appropriate Parks Mitigation fee based on $354.51 per each multi-family unit. 3. The applicant will be required to pay the appropriate Transportation Mitigation fee based on $75.00 per net new average daily trip attributed to the project. 4. Temporary Erosion and Sedimentation Control Measures shall be installed and maintained to the satisfaction of the representative of the Development Services Division for the duration of the project. r Comments on the above application must be submitted In writing to Nancy Wen, Associate Planner, Development Services Division, 1055 South Grady Way, Renton, WA 98055. by 5:00 PM on July 9, 2004. If you have questions about this proposal, or wish to be made a party of record and receive additional notification by mail, contact the Project Manager. Anyone who submits written comments will automatically become a party of record and will be notified of any decision on this project. CONTACT PERSON: NANCY WElL TEL: (425) 430·7270 II PLEASE INCLUDE THE PROJECT NUMBER WHEN CALLING FOR PROPER FILE IDENTIFICATION II E'A.-2'-5 RENTON ATLAS OF SEATTLE <o" .... w"o._ ....... · "ROlL .... CO"P~NV. INC, SUTTLE «>C •• ,~~ .. , ,00"" ~01'--r\l vr REN TON W ~ 9-23-5 If you would like to be made a party of record to receive further information on this proposed project, complete this form and return to: City of Renton, Development Planning, 1055 So_ Grady Way, Aenton, WA 98055. File No./Name: LUA04·061, SA·A, SHPL·A, ECF I Pazooki Townhouses Short Plat NAME: ____________________________________________ __ ADDAESS: __________________________________________ ___ TELEPHONE NO.: ________________ _ CITY OF RENTON CURRENT PLANNING DIVISION AFFIDAVIT OF SERVICE BY MAILING On the 28'h day of June, 2004, I deposited in the mails of the United States, a sealed envelope containing Acceptance Letter documents. This information was sent to: ~;r;'!Ii;rt+;. '7 ,,'7"7 ; ,j"" Cij', ~ 1 •• l;::~f0li~ili1:f"~:II,rI1 ;"",:!,jYi'iif i',"i,' I' .:. ,,?),:'Ii':;:"':J:f.I.f,' Omied Pazooki Contact A3 Investments LLC Owner Siavoosh Pazooki Applicant 1!rJ 1il:hdt. """,""""'\\", Of A _____ _", ~ I<AMc "'" (Signature of Sender~ ~ .I"::} ........ ;y~ " :~ .• ·~S\ON ~.t~ .. ~ '" ; ~-.. ~\' ~6. ~ STATE OF WASHINGTON i ~~::l ~O;AF!'" ~\ ~ ) S5 ~ :0 &1».0>11" ~ ~ COUNTY OF KING ) ~ \. PuOt.\(oJ / ~ ; ~/\Jl ... '" :1 /,,: " '1),'" 6.29-0 •. ,~" ~ I certify that I know or have satisfactory evidence that Stacy M. Tucker .... l: o········s .... " __ -.:" signed this instrument and acknowledged it to be his/her/their free and voluntary act fol't~n~t.~ purposes mentioned in the instrument. Dated: 7/00,10'1 f Washington Notary (Print):, _______ .lMI/UAlilBilLll YNlJlLJK!.,!AIIIIMCILiHwEFF:I:t.. _________ _ My appointment expires: MY APPOINTMENT EXPIRES 6-29'()7 PrOJect Name: Pazooki Townhouses Short Plat Project Number:' LUA04-061, SA-A, SHPL-A, ECF ~.~ .. ~ . .,jI . CITY ,--",FRENTON PlanningIBuildinglPublicWorks Department Gregg Zimmerman P.E., Administrator Kathy Keolker-Wheeler, MayoI' June 28, 2004 Omied Pazooki 3404 N E 6th Street Renton, WA 98056 Subject: Pazooki Townhouses Short Plat LUA-04-061, SA-A, SHPL-A, ECF Dear Mr. Pazooki: The Development Planning Section of the City of Renton has determined that the subject application is complete according to submittal requirements and, therefore, is accepted for review. . It is tentatively scheduled for consideration by the Environmental Review Committee on July 20, 2004. Prior to that review, you will be notified if any additional information is required to continue processing your application. Please contact me at (425) 430-7270. if you have any questions. Sincerely, NancyWeil Associate Planner cc: A3 Investments LLC IOwner Siavoosh Pazooki IApplicant ~ -------lO-5-5-S-ou-t-h-G-ra-d-y-W-a-y-~--Re-n-to-n-,-W-a-sh-in-g-to-n-9-g-0-55-. ------R EN TON * This paperconl~ins 50% recycled material, 300/. post'consumer AHEAD OF THE CURVE , MayolT June 28, 2004 Superintendent's Office Renton School District #403 300 SW 7'h Street Renton, WA 98055-2307 Subject: Pazooki Townhouses Short Plat LUA-04-061, SA-A, SHPL-A, ECF CITY •. RENTON PlanningfBuildinglPublicWorks Department Gregg Zimmerman P.E., Administrator The City of Renton Development Services Division has received an application for a multi-family development located at 972 Edmonds Avenue NE. Please see the enclosed Notice of Application for further details. In order to process this application, the Development Services Division needs to know which Renton schools would be attended by children living in residences at the location indicated above. Please fill in the appropriate. schools on the list below and return this letter to my attention, Development Services Division, City of Renton, 1055 South Grady Way, Renton, Washington 98055, Elementary School: _______ ---' __ ~ _______________ _ Middle School: _________________________ _ High School: _____________________ -'-____ _ Will the schools you have indicated be able to handle the impact of the additional students estimated to come from the proposed development? Yes No,---, __ Any Comments: ____ ~----------------------- Thank you for providing this important information. If you have any questions regarding this project, please contact me at (425) 430-7270 .. Sincerely, NancyWeil Associate Planner Encl. ~ -.-.. -------.------IO-5-5-S-ou-t-h-a-ra-d-y-W-a-y---R-cn-to-n-,-W-a-sh-in-g-to-n-9-g-0-55-.------R E -N TON (1) This paper contains 50% recydad material, 300/0 postconSUmef AHEAD OF THE CURVE ORDlNAIC3 NO. ~J:I,;2- ~. -po {.2-9/?>& -Z;~ Lr"j'SS AN ORDIW.~'CE OF THE CI'IY OF RENTON, WIISHIICTON, VACATlm A PORTION OF 10th PlACE NORTH, RENTON, !;ASHINGTON. ~637 WHEREAS e, pre-por petitfo!) fer westing e Jertain portion of ,treat a. herein- after more partieularly described 'Was duly filed with the City Clerk of the, City of Renton on or about April 3, 1967, and said petition being signed by the owners of more than two-thirds of the property abutting upen such portion of ,treat sought to be vacated. and WHEREAS the City by Resolution No. 1453, lind after due investigation did fix. and determine the 26th day of June, 1967, at the hour of 8aOO P.M. in the City Co'uncil Chambers at the City of Renton, to be the time and plate for public hearing thereon; 8nd directed the. Clerk to give notice of said hearing in the manner provided by law; 8nd IUch notice baving been duly given and published and III persons beving been heard appear- ing in flvor of or in opposition thereto} and WHEREAS the Planning Cemmhaien hiving duly aenald.red aald petition, end 8.id vacation 88 hereinafter more pertieularly de.eribed beIng feund te be In the public interest and for the publ ie benefit and ne injury or damage to any perlon or properties will re8ult therefrom. NO, THEREFORE BE IT ORllll INED BY THE !1<IYOR AND THE cm COUNCIL a! rHE em (1! RENTON AS P'OLl.(WS: SECTION II The follewlftg dea.r1bed portion et .treet, te-witl The South tittee. 0" teet ot the No; 1/4 .t the No; l/4 and the north tilte.n 0" teet ot the Sil 1/4 .t the NN 1/4 1n Section 9.2.'5 • .5 lyi.n, between the •• It line of "E" Street and the 8outbwe.terly l1.ne of SUnset !Itllevard East, leas the We.t 130 teet, Between 10th Ave. N. and lOth Pl. N. BE AND THE S~E IS HEREBY VACATED, StmJECT ro AND RESERVING UNTO THE CI'IY OF RENTON •• ; 20 foot Easement for utility purposes and the centerline thereof being centered on the .... "'~.rtb.d right-of-way. SeCTION IX; This Ordinance shall be in tull torce and ettect trem .nd .f'ur ita p8uage, approval and legll PUblleetifn. I. provi.ded br law. PASSED BY THE CI'IY COUlCIL thb 'r4 dlY ot APPROVED BY THE MAYOR tH. AP7::,:~r-'> (/ /~?~ , ~rard M. ShellaD, City A ttomey. Date ot Pub1l4tUon: JUl 6 1967 Dot~04-g VII! ()4 -'. fJ ( City of Renton LAND USE PERMIT MASTER APPLICATION PROPERTY OWNER(S) PROJECT INFORMATION NAME: PROJECT OR DEVELOPMENT NAME: A~ \,,·~tme()h:. LLC. :-;"1\07 ~\f\T PROJECT/ADDRESS(SYLOCATION AND ZIP CODE: qlL E!Mbh)i)~ P\\lE.t-JVr-\U~ CITY: T u \<:. ZIP: \2. ~ ~Ct.:. I \oJ 'PI q~6SCo KING COUNTY ASSESSOR'S ACCOUNT NUMBER(S): APPLICANT (if other than owner) { .... ()qz...30~'\ \'?'\ NAME: EXISTING LAND USE(S): SII.:la.\<=-e"hll\V 11I11(.AtJ't c\.-\C'\hc..bl\~\!$ COMPANY (if applicable): ~ .. ~. PROPOSED LAND USE(S): '. \J.$\\ \ -fPlM.\\\/ ADDRESS: . EXISTING COMPREHENSIVE/PLAN MAP DESIGNATION: I. U:. CITY: ZIP: 800b PROPOSED COMPREHENSIVE PLAN MAP DESIGNATION (if applicable): H,,\\\ -~AU\L\/ TELEPHONE NUMBER I EXISTING ZONING: R"-\-L CONTACT PERSON PROPOSED ZONING (if applicable): '\2,. ~ -C NAME: SITE AREA (in square feet): \.~ ISO ~ SQUARE FOOTAGE OF ROADWAYS TO BE DEDICATED COMPANY (if applicable): FOR SUBDIVISIONS OR PRIVATE STREETS SERVING THREE LOTS OR MORE (if applicable): - ADDRESS: "61..\0 CITY: ZIP: PROPOSED RESIDENTIAL DENSITY IN UNITS PER NET ACRE (if applicable): \ q. 355 NUMBER OF PROPOSED LOTS (if applicable): 2 TELEPHONE NUMBER AND E·MAIL ADDRESS: NUMBER OF NE~ DWELLING UNITS (if applicable): Q:\WEB\PW\DEVSERV\Forms\Planning\masteJ'ilpp.doc08l29/03 (' ~ ~OJECTINFORMATrl~O~N~(~4c~o~nL~ .. ~,u~e~dL-) ____________ -, . NUMBER OF EXISTING DWELLING UNITS (rt applicable): NOIJE- SQUARE FOOTAGE OF PROPOSED RESIDENTIAL BUILDINGS Of applicable): IJOIJE. A'r 1H I~ TI~I'_ SQUARE FOOTAGE OF EXISTING RESIDENTIAL BUILDINGS TO REMAIN (if applicable): No I-H'_ SQUARE FOOTAGE OF PROPOSED NON·RESIDENTIAL BUILDINGS (if applicable): ~ 0 I.l'i'_ SQUARE FOOTAGE OF EXISTING NON·RESIDENTIAL BUILDINGS TO REMAIN Of applicable): _ ~ () Iol~ NET FLOOR AREA OF NON·RESIDENTIAL BUILDINGS (if applicable): N ololE. NUMBER OF EMPLOYEES TO BE EMPLOYED BY THE NEW PROJECT (ifappUcable): NO~'" PIT Tl\1!. \\~~ PROJECT VALUE: IS THE SITE LOCATED IN ANY TYPE OF ENVIRONMENTALLY CRITICAL AREA, PLEASE INCLUDE SQUARE FOOTAGE (if applicable): N I '" o AQUIFER PROTECTION AREA ONE o AQUIFER PROTECTION AREA TWO o FLOOD HAZARD AREA sq. ft. o GEOLOGIC HAZARD sq. ft. o HABITAT CONSERVATION sq. ft. o SHORELINE STREAMS AND LAKES sq. ft. o WETLANDS sq. ft. LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF PROPERTY (Attach lea.al description on separate sheet with the following information included) SITUATE IN THElI!w~t~.w~UARTER OF SECTION -.i., TOWNSHIP~, RANGE..5!:; I'N THE CITY OF RENTON, KING C U TY, ASHINGTON. ! . -. iJ • '. -~' ,,'. 'I. '., , TYPE OF APPLICATIQN& FEES -.' ., List all land use applications being applied for: 1. 'S;\<.~ \I:X:O ,(/I. 3. "t:.,,~ ~ ~. ____ ~ 'Q.", • .J $:>0 .... 2. ~c-+-~ ~ ... OQ 4. ?>:l.. 0 .~., Staff will calculate applicable fees and postage: $ ~~. ~~ AFFIDAVIT OF OWNERSHIP I. (Print Name/s) S'QVQo",.h \>e'2 00\5: i declare that I am (please check one) _ the current owner 01 the property involved in this application or -L the authorized representative to ad lor a corporation (please attach prool 01 authorization) and that the foregoing statements and answers herein alned and the information herewith are In all respeds true and corred to the best 01 my knowledge and bellel. (Signature 01 OWn'''e ~_enhllliV8) (Signature 01 OwnerlRepresentative) Q:\WEBIPW\DEVSERVlFonnslPlanninglmasterapp.doc08I29/03 I certify that I know or have satisfactory evidence that.S"', A VOOS h fC, 200K,' signed this Instrument and acknowledged n to be hislherlthelr lree and VOluntary ad lor the uses and purposes mentioned In the instrument Notary(Print)G'e,2.., (~eo My appointment expires: c>? -9 -0 7 LIST OF SURROUNDING PROPERTY OWNERS WITHIN JOO·FEET OF THE SUBJECT SITE City of Renton Development Services Division 1055 South Grady Way, Renton, WA 98055 Phone: 425430·7200 Fax: 425-430·7231 CITY O~'tJ:~~~NING JUN 102004 f\A"IRECEIVED PROJECT NAME: A?, \OVL'\!me.o-tS LlC $b()U APPLICATION No:_----'OW""--''--D.=..lo''''-!..I _______________ _ The following is. a list of ~roperty owners within 300 feet of the subject site. The Development Services D,v,s,on Will nobly these Individuals of the proposed development. NAME ADDRESS \. GALVfllZ.~, v,Apt,'[ .. t~H\!'2.c,,~ .\~2..,\ r,tl\.\b»t>S fI\l~ ~'<.- 2. to.~2...sAr·l ~",::;"c"-' 'I. . ·;i,,51-,,;i.lt,()~h tll. \. ,_" '_",' ~'''ll(' • I .t-~.":l ~ 3. CI9L\)"''LW 't~AiftilJ!rll~c,;"~·;t:i...1\ -,'q\ll \tt,~~..,,,s f>,\l ..... Nt.-9=1:::t:...}. '1 I ,." . 1.\. SMIT~IZ..""\"i>.'f.~'\..~~Ll\ \..'t~H<' \M1 ~t"..I.:O"l>'S I\\lL ~ ~ .. ~ ............... ,~ ...... "", ~ '--- ~. Cf\lV~l2.i ~"'i?3\~i:.~r\t,j~1.\\ li~1J J~~~I-J1l'; f')IlL t-lL (p, c.f\\...\)!W .. ~ ~A\ST'S\ (.~\}~'"' ,ooS' tt>"'-O"",S I'I\lL ~ 7. I-lf'lSS \\)AI0 1..+\l.I:.A"-il4L!L "'" Z$oe, t-lL ,\"l-I :Vir. ~, ~i' \ll~%L>L.1..... \lJl.. 2520 I-lL 'li-h 'ilL. q. ~\-\1'1~ At.:lT\ I4bAI..:>/,-t-IJ''''1 \)E.QW 10\'2.. 'b..DN.c""1::>~ f'l0 ..... WL \C;, \Oe.I...SW UIO.~I...1:... + -2:>\.>\",0-,,"8 (;:.~~tVl:>'" -AilE... NIL. II.I.HISS 'ut'>...,\....+\>, .. "'~$.~ C\bC> c..$IJ..O"''''~ 1\\11<-~'c....... \ '1... NDI><r \),L'\:>11... '\.l q 2.<1. £.1:>~o""1>S .fill .... I-J'l...- I?', \)tLIo."",,,<;,OU 't\<;?'I1.:i!.£.iL' 1-\ "liISS> ..... !;..,,"-'-00P'S AvL. >.lC " ' 'i'l' < 't' "'. .">'.\A\.3·: .. ;:.":~".,1)I'\L£. <..,fL t-lL.. \' :-:.~ ,,"il" , " ": 1" '",. \\i. V~1>£.~(\W \..A,I'\Q...'I /;l .... /!2.3. ·FE,c,;,DAUi ...... C-til.. 10,,- \\0, \.A""I-\\~()'" FI~"-£."'<.. ..... :6'· :'." 7..S6~,:.sUN5E..-r:; 73/...-I)D II. L.I\\..\)M...~ ~ ... ""SI LY\\)('-"·· .. · lok'l.; '",DN.,~~$ A VI<.... AlL- \ 8. ~ F \l)i<..~Uf\\...'-\1-' c\'C;-:.> ... ,·, ",;;;.;,.;::>,.;.;-<: "";'.~i, .~---- ~ (). . .. ,-'~.'.' " \'\ ... ~e.\J\i',\--.l~ .. HX ... ~ R.Hl..!;.t,)02:I-\·:q.~p':/,tD'MOt0l>S -BUL I-lL l \. &\/JIL,/f'I.. \'I\\)\.I.tI~ L 2.2.+\\&-1$,\-\\ jOllAW K q,c> ~l>""DIo.lt>S. fill£. ~L 23 ...... 1'11 I)",$lb-...J+-\...I\\ Ll!.\~t\"'" ~ <\\0, Ftl2.tvi:>i\\..<-(.IlL 0~ Q:lWEBIPW\DEVSERVlFonnslPlanninglowners.doc08/29/03 ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NUMBER oSz. 305'113 \ 082306'\0"''\ 082:;05'1135 C>8,2.30 '5'10'-( ':f o 82. ~I> 5q07 3' 0'\'2.305<1 0 67 6"1"2.3 6 5'10'5'1 a 'I "2. 3 6!i '71 0 1 0"1"2.3 0 5'71 1'1 o 'I '2. ~ <> 6'1 /1% 092.305 «2./0 7 2."Z.,S()()Z 2. S /<-"2.. '$,,03.5.s '2?. '1 500 L/ I '5 72..7.. 7$001...1"2>; 012505'7 0.58 0,("236t;,oBf.. 0"12>;,05'11/3 (5'( 2.. 3051/58 0'( z. 30 ~'l 2..07 12.."2... ,sa() \ Co <0 1 L..?,,"'" S003"6 1 2-2. ,oooLj z.o NAME ttf. f2.€IiO A LfI1 .. ai) '81-$0"'6' y 2 S. &\j.)\L~k. '\-\t1M.f'IS L 2.10. 'i5~\ L\:;S!-\ 11tL 1-'."',",0 1!.. fY~rS • (Attach additional sheets. if necessary) ADDRESS Z $11 fJ(...'('f h PL. 9~:; £DN'\JI)S 11011:. f'lL 2021{ PL '/'fh PI... 2.1. \IN\\,\:...'''' S'lATi:.S l:C.6$' ~v",s"'T"'l.';'IVL l~. £L:ZI6-'8E.7T! (/'-'£STOn..... 240$ tJL I~'" 51. Zer· FIE.L.l)!>-ro"'MI(M.~'ilQ.£..U-l"'1v\ 2("30 !-if.. '1.fh PL. 30. \)\\"\ .. :<: .. \)/7 ~j\~II>..c.....+-DAISy z .. wz... /J£. 10~" S'l. 3' 1:>£5+-\l'.10 l;..ILI L '1'~$ [DM6o.lD!;, I\\JL NL ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NUMBER 72'2. ,$00 47S 1 2. z. ..., ~ <S C:> 2.5 C:> 11.1. ,500 S30 ,2-2,86(OSS C\. 27-S'looo~S '1 V .. 7~co5LfO q n $'1' 60 C '2./ '1'2.'2.'5460070 1,-__ . ., ~, 'EI. fo1..J9!:.l.') 'W~'V,Jc£, NOTARY me. a Not~bliC. in an ~...,..f:t;;i>;s;;J,J.!~i.l),.-r.-........ -I--on the day of for the State of Washington;., J . .20...,.... -For City of Renton Use-· ........................ '\\'\\\\, " 'IN K4 III CERTIFICATION OF MAILING:~~\·s"t" ... "'d'lll . : ~ •• ~~~\S 01\1 ;:" "S: " ~~.ru/> ' .''''' ''+. •• ~~ I. / UJ...FI(;;V • hereby certify that notices of the propojed ~PPlilllil1iD1q~1~/~I~d to (Employee) -r:.,o. ,i ~ fJ): A c:::...~ en: ~ each listed property owner on u/J.J1e.. UJ .. ZOO.". ~ .... \ V8L1e ! i ~ /I 'I."'.)..y~ ·"it: Signed \.J,{1i'Juy Date: W'it[i;'W/~·';''\O./ ~ 'I, ASH\"" ........ - NOTARY ,,\"""', ........ .... Q:\WEBIPWlDEVSERVlFormslPlanninglowners.doc MARILYN KAMCHEFF MY APPOINTMENT EXPIRES 6-29-m' 2 ~...s-Y' 3· 7 2. ~ I a ~ ~~ Cfti,/I S(~.5 S;Atif<fS H f~~o.~~· . & 7M. ,l/p ~ ,43 ~v~-I-~ ~ 1t. ~ ~5 D be"'"'.:t (~J~{) y~). f>rl!e..r Do~~-4 ~ }tIl tv-iJn-u aJ~ -+I'~. ?~ GJI ~ ;JJ~ /3w-e qY ~~. " ~OO/TOol2J XVd 6T: n 11Hl. \'0/OT/90 , DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE PHILADELPHIA PA 19255-0023 Date of this notice: 03-10-2004 E~ploye~ Identification Nu~be~: 73-1696731 Fo~m: S5-4 Humber of this notice: CP 575 B x For assistance you may call us at: 1-600-629-4933 A3 'INVESTMENTS LLC PAZOOKI SIAVOOSH MBR 6100 SOUTHCENTER BLVD NO 25Q TUKWILA WA 98188 IF YOU WRITE, ATTACH THE STUB OF THIS NOTICE. WE ASSIGNED YOU AN EMPLOYER IDENTIFICATION NUMBER Thank :you -for applying -for an Employer Identi'Fication Number (EIN). ·We assigned you EIN 73-1696731. This fIN will identifY your business account~ tax returns, and documents even if YDU have no employees. Please keep this notice in your permanent records. When fili~g tax documents, please usc the label IRS provided. If that isn1t possible, you should us~ your ErN and complete nam~ and address shown above on all federal tax forms, payments and related correspondence. If this information isnlt correct, please correct it using the teal"" off stub from this notice. Return it to us so we can correct your account. If you use any variation of your n~me or ErN, it may cause a delay in processing und may r~sult in incorrect information in your account. It also could cause you to be assigned more th~n one EIN. Based on the in~ormation from YOU or YOUr represent~tive, yOU must ~ile the ~ollowing form(sJ by the date shown next to it. form l065 0~/1512005 If you have Questions about the form(~) or the due datc(s) shown, you can call us at l-800-829-4933 or write to us at the address at the top of tne first page of this letter. If you need help in determining what· your tax year is, you can get Publication 538, Accountins Periods and Methods, at your local IRS D~+ice. We assigned you a tax classific~tiDn based on infor~ation obtained from you or your representative. It is not a legal determination of you~ tax classification, and is not binding on the IRS. If you wunt a determination of your tax claSSification, you may seek a private letter ruling Trom the IRS under the procedures sct forth in Revenue Procedure 98-01, 1998-1 I.R.B.7 (or the superceding revenue p~ocedure for the year at issue). .00/;:00 Ii'! YV.:I 6T: n 11!I.L to/OT/90 r [~Fe-I CITY OF RENTON Total Amount Due: 11.1 •• 1 •• 1.11 ••• 11 •••• 11 ••••• 11 •• 11 ••• 1.1.11 ••••• 111, I ••• 1.1.1 A3 INVESTMENTS ATIN: SIAVOOSH PAZOOKI 12819 SE 38TH ST # 226 BELLEVUE WA 98006-1326 PLEASE RETURN THIS PORTION WITH YOUR PAYMENT UTILITY DIVISION CITY OF RENTON PO BOX 9119 $ 15.67 RENTON WA 980573002 130229030002000015678 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - ---- - - - --/~;;;T~~; ;l~~S-E~~:D~~; ;E~;~N-;O;;E;~/;E--i SE~VJ~~\hl:~X~;~:~~itii~~~'I~K.~,;:' Water 3/4" Renton Wastewater Suriace Waler Kinq County Wastewater Treatment Garbage PickuplHaul, Dump, Extras CURRENT CHARGES PREVIOUS BALANCE PAYMENT -Thank you ADJUSTMENTS TOTAL AMOUNT DUE Message CITY OF RENTON UTILITY BILL C_';":;:":':;"";:;:,!:AMQ\JNJ1,;. 'li,,;"'(;c'~ii.';i~",:l ~.:J.~}"~;i~c:.cqu NJ:;.INl;qB!\'Iij;nQjjJ!:iCi4;~l~~J~~-:;;;';i.;; $10.46 Meter Usage From: 03/01/04 To: 05/06/04 $.00 PREC 08617025 1427 1427 $5.21 $.00 $.00 $.00 $15.67 $16.21 $16.21 $.00 $15.67 usage 1100 cu ft o e ! , < 2 0 2 BIlling period: 04116/04-05/14104 MONTHLY WATER CONSUMPTION HI~lorlGIII DIllin" " .. 01001 tomur1l1 ...... n Please note the new account number listed above. Please use this new account number for all ruture payments and inquiries. I 6 Mwy /4lJr M3f Ftlb Jan Doc NOV' Oc. Soop Aug Jut .)un ER~T··.PA,OA I zoonOf) IiJ XVd H:n i1Hl. \'0/01190 AVELOPMENT SERVICES DIVISION • WAIVER m= SUBMITTAL REQUIREIVI'ENTS FOR LAND USE APPLICATIONS Calculations f Color~d./liI~Jl¥for[)iSJllaY4.· •••• "'··· •••••••••••••••••••••••••• .. ••••· ... ·.·.·.1 .. ·· ........... · ... ···· .... ·· .. 1· •••••• ·•· ••••••••••••••••••••.••• ··•· ... ·•···•· ••• ·•···•· •• ·· ••••• ·.222 ___ •• .---2 ..... · ...... . Construction Mitigation Description 2 AND. i:>en¥~Vv'0rksh~~t. «.....1<...1<21..>......< Drainage Control Plan 2 ~ii)~g~F@prt<.·· ••• · ........ ••••••••••• •••••.••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••.••..• · ••• · •• • ....... •· ••• · ... • ••••• ·.1· .• • •• · •••••• • ••..•..•.••••••.•• ~ ________ ............. . Elevations, Architectural 3 AND' ~~vir9i1I)lef)i*I¢!1~C~liSt.....»....> .. I ... »I«..L .. Existing Covenants (Recorded Copy). ~~i~ihg.$~~rnel1is~¢i:#d~d¢8py);.·.· .............................................. '1 ..•.••• ·• •• • ..... • •.•••••.••••••• ·.·.1 .... · .. · .... · .. · ........................................... > .......... ··....L .. ·· .. Flood Hazard Data. ;//0 ·Fki~rl'lan~;NiD~ •••• • .. ••• .. • .. •··· ........................................................................................ ~ ••.•••.•. · .•.•••• · ••. L22 ••• ··· ••.••• · •••••. · •• • •••• · •.••••••••••••••••.••.•• <l111 ovtl~1 r-(q~({rrd rf t,ew,l11vv7IDP -) fM..l, GradiligPial1;.C()nceptl.l~12 ••••••• ·•• .............................................................................. · •••••••••••• 2 .•••• · •••.•••••..•••••••.••• · •.•.••• 2 •• ·.· •••••.•• ··••.•••.•••••.•.•••..••.••••...•••••• LAJ/ t-v1 Geotechnical Report 2 AND 3 r-7l1 Grading Plan, Detailed 2 ., v f.,.H..,..~b'"'"'ita.,.;:t:".,t:la'"'"'ta:""".R:7'. ~""'o....,.rt'""}""' ••••• ..,...·. '"" .... ""' ••••• ..,.. ..... ""' •••• """ ••••• ..,.. ••••• '"'"' •••• """ ..... ..,->'"'"' •••• """ ••••• ""'<" .. k=>~ . ..,..·· ... :;:cm""'.> ~ ... + ••• =.· .....•. = ••••••••• """·<·<c=I< . ....,.>'""<~N"'-<'"'"'tT/ff" = •••• ..,......,. ••••••..•. ~ ••••••••• = .••••••••• = •••.•..•. ....,...,.. •••.•••• ·.'"'"' ••• l.d.> )J;1I King County Assessor's Map Indicating Site. t.a£1~~#r@~~@.c(i~~$~i0al.4 ... ·•· ...................................... f ••. • •• · ••• · •. · •••• ··•·· •••.• ·.I ••••••• · •••• · ................................................................................. < •••..•..••••...••.•..•.•••••• Legal Description. I.is\~i$1it@iidih~F'r()~.()\'ii1ets •••••••••• • ••••••••••• · ••••• ,.·> ••• ·•· •.•• ··•· •• · •• · ... ·1 ..................................... <.<.< •• < •• < .......... < •...•.• < ........ < .. < .. < .... > Mailing Labels for Property Owners. rv1W8f¥~j~tii1g~it~9dn~iii~Il~.·· ••• ·•• ••••••• • ••••• ••• •••• •· •••• • •.••• ·.1 ..... ·.·· .. · ............. · .. · .. I· •.• ··· ••• · •...•••••••••••• ··.·.~ ••• Master Application Form 4 rv1<;lh~nJ¢n.t¢~r~s(on~8#:I)l<;lr@i¢~t); ....1< .. 1..1><....< .. >< Neighborhood Detail Map. This requirement may be waived by: 1. Property Services Section 2. Public Works Plan Review Section 3. Building Section 4. Development Planning Section PROJECT NAME: _ .... f_o_'Z-_OO.,.-k-_I_· ___ _ DATE: _....:(R=-i(f.'-{ +-f o_L:....1 __ _ DEVELOPMENT PLANNING CITY OF RENTON JUN 1 0 2004 RECEIVED Q;\WEB\Pw\OEVSERV\Forms\Planning\waiver.xls 01106/2004 ~ DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DIVISr~ WAIVI!:R OF SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS FOR lAND USE APPLICATIONS Parking, Lot Coverage & Landscaping Analysis. pl~nRectuctiori~wrvrrs} ••• • ••• • .....•.•.•.•.•.•....... .. • .................... }>.> •. } ••• < 1».· ••.• · •••••••.••.•• < I •••. · •••• · •.••..• · •.•..• } .••• >··.« ...••• · •• >.·· ............ < ..... > •. ?. Postage. P:r~ap81iIiaii~iiM~~iiri9~urfirfi~ii{··< ••• • •••....•••••••••• « ••.. «< ••••• r><>· .• ·> •• >.I.· •.•• > •. ».·< ••• >· •. >.·>· •.••• · ••••• ><r.·. Public Works Approval Letter, Screening Detail • Street Profiles, < ~~ .. ......................................................... : •.......... : .•.. : ~ ......... :·.·.·.·.·.·.·.·:·.·.·.· ... ·.· ... 1·.· ... ·.·.·.·:: ... · .. : ............. : .. : ................. : ............. : ............... :.:.:: .... . Ti!lf~~ppr't.9));>liif·9~if'9!\~.~ •• •••• . : ...... : ••••• : ................ : :: ••• : ••• : .............. : ........ 1 ...................................................................... : ......................... . Topography Map3 jr~fijc$iu~h •• ><·' ..................... :.: ............ ,. , .•.•.•. , .•.•.•. ,. >1 •••• '··.)·· •• « •••••••• '.·.·.·)· •••••.••• · ••• 1>·.,.·.),·/ •••.••••• ' ... '.).< •.••••••••••..• '} ••. '.» •••••• }., .•.••. Tree Cutting/Land Clearing Plan • ~ l>.t J2J ch:::2.tYKJ CI' b k J Utilities Plan, Generalized, Wireless: Applicant Agreement Statement 2 AND 3 Inventory of EXisting Sites ,AND3 Lease Agreement, Draft 2AND 3 Map of Existing Site Conditions, AND 3 Map of View Area 2 AND 3 Photosimulations 'AND 3 This requirement may be waived by: 1. Property Services Section 2. Public Works Plan Review Section 3. Building Section 4. Development Planning Section PROJECT NAME: _--,"f.-,8_'Z.,--O_O_~---,-( ____ _ DATE: _.;;...{jJ+-!yll_O_Lf ____ _ I Q:\WEB\Pw\oEVSERV\Forms\Planning\waiver.xls 01/06/2004 ,- AFFIDAVIT OF INSTALLATION OF PUBLIC INFORMATION SIGN City of Renton Development Services Division 1055 South Grady Way, Renton, WA 98055 Phone: 425-430-7200 Fax: 425-430-7231 STATE OF WASHINGTON ) DEVELOPMENT PLANNING CITY OF RENTON COUNTY OF KING ) ) JUN 1 0 2004 BECEIVED being first duly sworn on oath, deposes and says: 1. On the J day of \\ Q Q E-,~.2.oo t ' I installed public information sign(s) and plastiC flyer box on the property located at q l ] E 1>4 010 D 'S A\l E.. I-.l~ for the following project: ~ E.t--)TQo-ll I.J PI '\ ~o.; b ';). • '\) 1.. -¥A2ock, =19 O~e.CT Project name A3 l()vc:.tM.&.nts LLL. Owner Name 2. I have attached a copy of the neighborhood detail map marked with an "X" to indicate the location of the installed sign. 3. This/these public information sign(s) was/were constructed and installed in 10ca;miNl!Ml(9A(ormanee.owit quirements 0 pter 7 Title 4 of Renton Municipal Co -Nata" Pubnc _ : . -. -_, 8IaID DfWashlnglDri .'- MARYANN SCHULTE ~ AppoInImant Explma May is, 2IID5 J, () 0 if ;1"YJ.5 SUBSCRIBED AND SWORN to before me this ..J.t.. day of ---'".....=.1.. ........ __ " * __ . residing My commission expires on Q:\WEB\PW\DEVSERV\Forms\Planning\pubsign.doc08/27/03 of at I 4" I . \'.< 14'1 c r ··PRQPO~EDLANqtlS~ ACTION 0 111~t,oIll.i·, jnstructior.s: .'.c:<p.,l:.ihe· ;m~ure the bottom· 'Of.. th~:.19n does not· v .. ' · .. :.'·::i~~' ';'~;\.'f'l~Jb:>P~ ... '''>:· .. ' .. ~:",!",,.Io;,)·,~~·,;'\\:'-;i':'~ir" ~ ,:,: .~ exceed ~48·~· f~~e"~ii:;toti:.a:·· ... " .~"I.:--;;.~--.,;,.~ .. : •. -. . . Us.4~ x 4' x 12: POSTS . . l!sP4' "lI')tt~cl"1-YW09p· . . • .. :~"'.1f'l'x3"GiIi,V. lAG.Q9LTS. WIWASHERS LErif~ING: . . ",1:)$0 HEI.NenpA~E1:rERlNG, . '8I!AcK'ON.wHi~!lAC!<GRbuND. .. .' .... , ,,' . " '." TITLe 3' ALL CAPS· . OTHl'iRl1r.i-.(:APS,~iId t~lOWER CASE ,,', ," •.. .. 1 ... ' "'" .• '. ,;. Q:\WEB\PW\DEVSERV\Fonro\Plnnning\pubsign.docOS/27/03 "', .~ .. . ... OEVELOPMENT PLANNING CITY OF RENTON JUN 1 0 2004 flC:~C:lvc:n DENSITY WORKSHEET City of Renton Development Services Division 1055 South Grady Way-Renton, WA 98055 Phone: 425-430-7200 Fax: 425-430-7231 1. Gross area of property: 1. G, I 75 /. S square feet <aod-. \01: 2. Certain areas are excluded from density calculations. These include public roadways, private access easements serving 3 or more dwelling units, and critical areas.* Total excluded area:" 2. ______ square feet 3. Subtract line 2 from line 1 for net area: 3. Col 151 .5 square feet 4. Divide line 3 by43,560 for net acreage: 4. _..:. • ....:.\...::S'-S __ acres 5. Number of dwelling units or lots planned: 5. _.--.:3",,-__ unitsllots 6. Divide line 5 by line 4 for net density: 6. _'_"_.3_5_5_ d.u.lacre 3 lots or~ould result in a net density of \ q:~ S 5 dwelling units per acre. *Critical Areas are defined as "Areas determined by the City to be not suitable for development and which are subject to the City's Critical Areas Regulations not including very high landslide areas, protected slopes, wetlands or floodways." Critical areas buffers are not deducted/excluded. ** Alleys (public or private) do not have to be excluded. Q:\WEBIPWlDEVSERV\FonnslPlanningldensity.doc08/29/03 1 Project Narrative Project Name: A3 Investments, LLC Short Plat This project is proposed to take place at 972 Edmonds Avenue Northeast, Renton, Washington 98056. A3 Investments is required to have Land Use permits including Short Plat and any other permits as required by the City of Renton. The size of the property is 13,503 square feet, and has most recently been used as a single family residence, however the lot is currently vacant and uninhabitable. This property as well as adjacent lots are zoned RMC, and the site itself contains no special features. The lot's soil is "Alderwood gravelly sandy loom" and any surface water is naturally absorbed by soil. At time of construction and thereafter, an established connection to storm drainage system will allow surface water to drain into storm drain, or any measures as required by the City of Renton will be taken to ensure compliance. A3 Investments proposes to subdivide the existing lot into two lots of equal size. Each lot will be 6,751.5 square feet per lot, with a density of 19.355 dwellings per acre. After subdivision, A3 Investments plans to construct two triplex structures, with one structure on each of the respective lots. No offsite improvements are proposed at this time, as Edmonds Avenue Northeast has existing curbs, sewer and adjacent fire hydrants. It is proposed that a total of 250 cubic yards of soil be excavated to prepare the site for building pad. In addition, it will not be necessary to remove any trees from the site. No land will be dedicated to the City. No job shacks, sales trailer and/or model homes will be used for this project. No modifications are being requested. Total costs of conducting the subdivision are estimated to be in the $35,000- 40,000 range. The fair market value of each subdivided lot is expected to be approximately $100,000 per lot. JUN , 0 2004 RECE\vED Construction Mitigation Description Construction of the proposed projects is to take place during the Summer of 2004 during the hours of 8:00-5:00 Monday through Friday. No special hours beyond the aforementioned are proposed for the project. Proposed Hauling and Transportation includes Interstate 405 to Northeast Park Drive to Northeast Sunset Boulevard to Edmonds Avenue Northeast to Site. At this time, there are no proposed measures to minimize dust, traffic, transportation impacts, or other noxious characteristics, as well as no preliminary traffic control plan. DEVELOPMENT PLANNING CITY OF RENTON JUN 1 0 2004 \ECEIVED · , \ DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DIVISION ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST City of Renton Development Services Division 1055 South Grady Way, Renton, WA 98055 Phone: 425-430-7200 Fax: 425-430-7231 PURPOSE OF CHECKLIST: The State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA), Chapter 43.21C RCW, requires all govemmental agencies to consider the environmental impacts of a proposal before making decisions. An Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) must be prepared for all proposals with probable significant adverse impacts on the quality of the environment. The purpose of this checklist is to provide information to help you and the agency identify impacts from your proposal (and to reduce or avoid impacts from the proposal, if it can be done) and to help the agency decide whether an EIS is required. INSTRUCTIONS FOR APPLICANTS: This environmental checklist asks you to describe some basic information about your proposal. Govemmental agencies use this checklist to determine wl:te\her the environmental impacts of your proposal are significant, requiring preparation of an EIS.Answer the questions briefly, with the most precise information known, or give the best description you can. You must answer each question accurately and carefully, to the best of your knowledge. In most cases, you should be able to answer the questions from your own observations or project plans without the need to hire experts. If you really do not know the answer, or if a question does not apply to your proposal, write "do not know" or "does not apply". Complete answers to the questions now may avoid unnecessary delays later. Some questions ask about governmental regulations, such as zoning, shoreline, and landmark designations. Answer these questions if you can. If you have problems, the govemmental agencies can assist you. The checklist questions apply to all parts of your proposal, even if you plan to do them over a period of time or on different parcels of land. Attach any additional information that will help describe your proposal or its environmental effects. The agency to which you submit this checklist may ask you to explain your answers or provide additional information reasonably related to determining if there may be significant adverse impact. USE OF CHECKLIST FOR NON PROJECT PROPOSALS: Complete this checklist for non project proposals, even though questions may be answered "does not apply." IN ADDITION, complete the SUPPLEMENTAL SHEET FOR NONPROJECT ACTIONS (part D). For non project actions (actions involving decisions on poliCies, plans and programs), the references in the checklist to the words "project," "applicant," and "property or site" should be read as "proposal," "proposer," and "affected geographic area," respectively. DEVELOPMENT PLANNIN' CITY OF REw('.1\J JUN 1 0 2004 R ~~EVSERV\Forms\Planning\envchlst.doc08129/03 A. BACKGROUND 1. Name of proposed project, if applicable: A3 \nve.~·hM .. f)\S. LL<.... S\-.QQ..\ ~\~ 2. Name of applicant: S'F\\JOO~'" ?f'I'?.OO~~ 3. Address and phone number of applicant and contact person: I~044 St.. Y4t '" ~\ C.t>"'~AC.1-p1O.1L~O~: ~ \1<1. V V<I.. W 1'\ "18001.. (ZCtCo'l 2.2."\ -Zc.."ll 4. Date checklist prepared: t--\ 1'12.-'.. ~ \ 6, 2..0 C> 4 5. Agency requesting checklist: 6. . Proposed timing or schedule (including phasing, if applicable): c.,Of'\~tlL\)c..t\O.-.) \s sc:.~eo.v\e..o.; ~~a... SV",",M~ z...oo'"\. 7. Do you have any plans for future additions, expansion, or further activity related to or connected with this proposal? If yes, explain. NO 8. List any environmental information you know about that has been prepared, or will be prepared, directly related to this proposal. 9. Do you know whether applications are pending for govemmental approvals of other proposals directly affecting the property covered by your proposal? If yes, explain. No 10. List any govemmental approvals or Ilermits that will be needed for your proposal, if known. Saf'F\, SYlo .... ~ ~''''"i,~I>.'O\'''~ '\>elLM.i\ 11. Give brief, complete description of your proposal, including the proposed uses and the size of the project and site. Tc. ~Uep\v'l>IL--n-\u... ". ... 's+,"'') lOT 10'tO -\o ..... a ~11.t''tQ. ... .,.1i.. 1e:.-I""5>. "Th~'" oTt..> bu.'d O()~ \\t..\-~'~ 0'"' ~ .... ~\-, 'c>"T. Q:\ WEBIPWlDEVSER VlFonnslPlanning\envchlst.doc 2 t· .. 12. Location of the proposal. Give sufficient information for a person to understand the precise location of your proposed project, including a street address, if any, and section, township, and range if known. If a proposal would occur over a range of area, provide the range or boundaries of the site(s). Provide a legal deSCription, site plan, vicinity map, and topographic map, if reasonably available. While you should submit any plans required by the agency, you are not required to duplicate maps or detailed plans submitted with any permit applications related to this checklist. ~12.. EOt-\.o~t>'1 FH)L t-lL. iLe.rr\"oN ,\~r;,,, ~"-l Y'I 0+ +,,",41.. ~w 'Iv.. ()~ ~~l. ~~ '/1.\ o~ -\"" \.)w '/,\ o~ SC!. .. ~IO~ '\,1.,..,l\s,",. ~ 'Z. ~, ""' .. ~<. ~,I", -I-~ (..'''"'1 0.(. 2.c.,,-\~, ",-,,,,,) Lc.->""""'\ \ W ... ",,,,,,,\ '1"01'\ BOo ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS 1. EARTH a. General description of the site (circle one);6Y rolling, hilly, steep slopes, mountainous, other . b. What is the steepest slope on the site (approximate percent slope?) 2. '0 -lO'o c. What general types of soils are found on the site' (for example, clay, sand, gravel, peat, muck)? If you know the classification of agricultural soils, specify them and note any prime farmland.' .;: .... A\delZ.Wooci ~~vc..\'1 $o.na~ \OO~ d. Are there surface indications or history of unstable soils in the immediate vicinity? If so, describe. e. f. g. h. NO Describe the purpose, type, and approximate quantities of any filling or grading proposed. Indicate source offill. 2.1;,0 c..vD,(" ~e.e.t" ~ C2lt("G.\)o.t\O~ \ ~ ~("O~~~ +0 ~("ef'AILc.. ~Itll.... ~o\t.... 'o\)'\dl""~ ~<.\ Could erosion occur as a result of clearing, construction, or use? If so, generally describe. '~)\~ E... \ S ~ \ ... " Q.~~ <c.e.O~IO,.) r.Q.~,.,It..O IS \0""', '"T~M.~01l....A1L~ \7._~"',O":' c....c.1'\"t'l-O\ ""'e ... \vQ..c. ... ~,\, be. \ ...... -r't~'"-c., "uo.,,,,,\ c.o",So\-("\J(.t,o\.l. About what percent of the site will be covered with impervious surfaces after project construction (for example. asphalt or buildings)? l'\'i!ouT Go> 10"70 o~ ;. "c.. "l>I ~ \S re.~ .. "~c' -\<> .., ... c.ovt.<t.&o. "',T~ -:.Til.I.)IOo:~\J~~ Pt ....... ~Q...,~"-... ~Lo,. Proposed measures to reduce or control erosion. or other impacts to the earth, if any: J. "T ......... ~ot\.. ........ 'I 'C..CLA:>'o , .. ....,. (.0"'", 'U>' ""', ...... .J Q.e -:. "',," '0.... ,"-\. ~ 'ot......a...t\ 're c\va... ..... '.) c.o ....... -I-II-v(...,,'o...; II"' .............. a..e\ .. vV-<... +c:. C-'Ti .... 't .... "J .. (~'!.Oo Q:\WEB\PW\DEVSERVlFonns\Planning\envchlst.doc 3 , 2. AIR a. What types of emissions to the air would result from the proposal (Le., dust, automobile, odors, industrial wood smoke) during construction and when the project is completed? If any, generally describe and give approximate quantities if known. L 1 t+\ /I...l,.o .., ." 'L b. Are there any off-site sources of emission or odor that may affect your proposal? If so, generally describe. c. NO Proposed measures to reduce or control emissions or other impacts to air, if any: .. 1 T"Io\\»V'1t.1 e.>-\.Sll ....... !> c.."f'1tLoi M.~r.\l20-S 1.0.)1\\ b(. \Mi'\~MI-/\te.q (o"'!. ... Cl..I,)(.\-.ot'\ ,>'\ ""c.c.oc.,o ........... -To (,.."'" s ...... "c!.o-tU>s 3. WATER a. Surface Water: 1) Is there any surface water body on or in the immediate vicinity of the site (including year- round and seasonal streams, saltwater, lakes, ponds, wetlands)? If yes, describe type and provide names. If appropriate, state what stream or river it flows into. No . l:: .... 2) Will the project require any work over, in, or adjacent to (within 200 feet) the described waters? If yes, please describe and attach available plans. I'lO 3) Estimate the amount of fill and dredge material that would be placed in or removed from surface water or wetlands and indicate the area of the site that would be affected. Indicate the source of fill material. "'bW~ 4) Will the proposal require surface water withdrawals or diversions? Give general deSCription, purpose, and approximate quantities if known. NO 5) Does the proposal lie within a 1 OO-year flood plain? If so, note location on the site plan. f'Jo 6) Does the proposal involve any discharges of waste materials to surface waters? If so, describe the type of waste and anticipated volume of discharge. )0.10 Q:\WEBIPW\DEVSERVlFonnslPlanning\envchlsldoc 4 " .. b. Ground Water: 1) Will ground water be withdrawn, or will water be discharged to ground water? Give general description, purpose, and approximate quantities if known. 2) c. 1) 2) d. No Describe waste material that will be discharged into the ground from septic tanks or other sources, if any (for example: Domestic sewage; industrial, containing the following chemicals ... ; agricultural; etc.). Describe the general size of the system, the number of such systems, the number of houses to be served (if applicable), or the number of animals or humans the system(s) are expected to serve. , ~ tJo_ v./"'$TE.. M"T~C.."''-10.)1\\ ':><-<1 ............. ""'\"" \1\'10 ... "' .. "jo..o\Jf"\ .. t> ....... ~+,<-S~""~ .. , .. l'('Opo~'" ~ 0<.0,",""'+ +0 """'"-1''''''\'''' ~ ...... c..r S"~+<tM • Wafer Runoff (Including storm water): Describe the source of runoff (including storm water) and method of collection and disposal, if any (include quantities, if known). Where will this water flow? Will this water flo"(~t~~~Il~'t'a~s,~~, dfe<wg~~ w.l\ ":It.. (" ... ,,,,~ ... \\. Pr"~tt.+ ..... ,11 .. oIlH+ ~""-;:V"CI,"~ ,(r ....... ,,"I-L roo+s ~ .... t.,~ .. ~...-oo.A "",."-,,,IlI\ ~'-Q's"Wv,\~c\ ' .... +0 , .,.'"t'-"""'+I~,\ S+O" ..... $'i ... +......-. ... , ...... -:l ;""'-roo...!. '''' "'-LC.or"-...... <A. +0 ~V\+ON :; s-\-co-""~ ... rc!.S . Could waste material enter ground or surface waters? If so, generally describe. ~o . Proposed measures to reduce or control surface, ground, and runoff water impacts, if ,_ any: yr .. ) ........ "",1\ n .. c.\.u''1""d. \I," cu.t.or""""" ...... \-0 (,'+'1 s~~t\ ...... t.'!> ..... r.,c..q 10' \\ ....... 0.\ ..... 4(. +\...&.. ''''''p ... ~T ~ 6.~w" s~ .......... ~,,~+ ....... , . 4. PLANTS a. Check or circle types of vegetation found on the site: __ deciduous tree: alder, maple, aspen, other __ evergreen tree: fir, cedar, pine, other b. c. shrubs ~ grass __ pasture __ crop or grain __ wet soil plants: cattail, buttercup, bullrush, skunk cabbage, other __ water plants: water lily, eel grass, milfoil, other __ other types of vegetation What kind and amount of vegetation will be removed or altered? kA)01l.1+1 O~ el<.., sf,,,,-,) v .. Je+ .... ~I"" \ ... lI \ \ 10 c.. List threatened or endangered species known to be on or near the site. AJo't'\c.. +0 M.,'r 'K",oyJ\~e.. d. Proposed landscaping, use of native plants, or other measures to preserve or enhance d. vegetation on the site, if any: L,....,t>5c. .... ~(.. '11(""" $ ...... \\ b .. (\4.~'"\" .. '" ,,,, .... <..<.or """ .. II. '\-0 (..l\-~ ST<--"'..!. ... ~ ... s .... ,,~ \,." \\ ,_~, .......... ~~ -t"""-V\<-0+ r-.... +,"' .. ~1 ..... ,,'\"S Q:I WEBIPW\DEVSER VlFonnslPlanninglenvchlst.doc 5 5. ANIMALS 6. a. Circle any birds and animals which have been observed on or near the site or are known to be on or near the site: Birds: hawk, heron, eagle, songbirds, other __ -:-:--:-___ _ Mammals: deer, bear, elk, beaver, other .,......So::9!:"Uu.''::It.:!.\ (.=S'-___ _ Fish: bass, salmon, trout, herring, shellfish,. other _____ _ b. List any threatened or endangered species known to be on or near the site. IJ 01-> If.. c. Is the site part of a migration route? If so, explain ",.,.. ,0 \1.,.'1 ~ ...... \e.~~1t. d. Proposed measures to preserve or enhance wildlife, if any: ~!\ ~ WA-~ \,)(I..e. ~ ~\:.A.-. "'" \\ It>.. e.. ""-, .... +0 (,'~'1 ~To\' .... A .... re\~ ENERGY AND NATURAL RESOURCES a. What kinds of energy (electric, natural gas, oil, wood stove, solar) will be used to meet the completed projecfs energy nI~eds? Desc~b~ . whether it will be used for heating, manufacturing, etc. E.\~c.lrl'"\<"\'\ "","'bO:.-" .. cA ~"r I.~"'~\ t"Cl.h ....... \ j .... ':> '-.l' \\ be. u .. c.t\ -(oIL ~c. ... -\ • b. Would your project affect the potential use of solar energy by adjacent properties? If so, generally describe. No c. What kinds of energy conservation features are included in the plans of this proposal? List other proposed measures to reduce or control energy impacts, if anYi Ef\ ..... yf <-"",HoI I-"A-"'-SvCLt~ WI ,\ 10<. \Y'<.~\~ ...... ",~c." ,n ~C.LO,.tI. ... ", ... <L -\-0 Co' ~'1 'lo+ ... "'c\ ..... " ~ 7. ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH a. Are there any environmental health hazards, including exposure to toxic chemicals, risk of fire and explosion, spill, or hazardous waste, that could occur as a result of this proposal? If so, describe. Nil 1) Describe special emergency services that might be required. 1-10>.16-ror .... <t. n 2) Proposed measures to reduce or control environmental health hazards, if any: Pr,,~~r ~<l.h~ ? ... r ..... "I-Io ... ~ 1.1.1"\. \j)c. "M.~\<I""-4."'-k(' !.Vh.t.("{. (\ <.t -4 S'$ "".,... ... / Q:\ WEBIPWlDEVSER VlFormslPlanning\envchlst.doc 6 ,. · , b. Noise 1) What types of noise exist in the area which may affect your project (for example: traffic, equipment, operation, other)? \\ <:.'" ~ 2) What types and levels of noise would be created by or associated with the project on a short-term or a long-term basis (for example: traffic, construction, operation, other)? Indicate what hours noise would come from the site. L~ 'OL 1\, (.( '-"" '!. ~ 0\"\ .... S~r~ -\-~n ...... , -T~ ~ .. ~cvt\"", ~~"'-T ,L "".. u.I," . \1'"'\ 16"~ + ... c-'-". 'ocU'S $0"",,,<' ~L I'\GI~L 0.,), I~ be. '3envC\.+c.A 3) Proposed measures to reduce or control noise impacts. if any: Y\ 0 vo...(.. I ~ ? ("'0 f"'!>e.cl 8. LAND AND SHORELINE USE a. What is the current use of the site and adjacent properties? I.c. \ I ":I It.. 1'"w ... \~<.. ,~ Va..L<>..~~ If) v \-c\ ,A ~ ....... '-....... '1.\ n~ Co c... ...... " v . , .L s c.\ "-f '" ch,u("I." t:LD ... t'h ............ +~ ~ ""':11<. {'" ... , Ill' ~d~(,.e."'~ 'l""~<""T'C ,1"\ v ,. ~, b. Has the site been used for agriculture? If so, des,cribe. l"\ e>-\ ~,,~\\ "v\o"'-' 1< <.\1 (., c. Describe any structures on the site. c..'>o ~" ('~. '"'0 .... (. """,a. ~SCl s'l' ~Q,r""1 L d. Will any structures be demolished? If so, what? '\ I hL I A"'<"' r,~o v(..c "' ........... GI.",cI, ~~'l (. w,ll b! cle ....... o'~ <{ e. What is the current zoning classification of the site? f2... t--.\ -c.... f. What is the current comprehensive plan designation of the site? t....\u\ hI ..(' ........ ,"/ g. If applicable, what is the current shoreline master program designation of the site? h. Has any part of the site been classified as an "environmentally sensitive" area? If so, specify. tJO i. Approximately how many people would reside or work in the completed project? It ,'" ~-h"""-o..hl +~+ ",,\'0"'+ IS 'j'£6pl4t w,\\ '\f.,"::.IQ./L \ V'\. ~\~ y'-O)c.c..~ v-J~ c.OM.t'I.(.hc\ Q:\ WEB\PWlDEVSER V\FormslPlanning\envchIstdoc 7 j. Approximately how many people would the completed project displace? (\one. k. Proposed measures to avoid or reduce displacement impacts, if any: ()Of\L I. Proposed measures to ensure the proposal is compatible with existing and projected land uses and plans, if any: . t-JO 9. HOUSING b. c. Approximately how many units would be provided, if any? Indicate wheth~r high, middle, or low-income housing. Co \ow \-0 ..... ,o.o.\e.. \r>(.o~ h~U'ioll(""\j VI"\'*S Approximately how many units, if any, would be eliminated? Indicate whether high, middle, or low-income housing. 01't., It'~ c.1)("("O.(\\\'/ \1"I"'c.."',-\-<-.., .... \L Proposed measures to reduce or control housing impacts, if any: 1"'10"" (. i;·· .'. 10. AESTHETICS a. b. c. What is the tallest height of any proposed structure(s), not including antennas; what is the principal exterior building material(s) proposed. A 'oOl..)t 30-3:; {" u.-\-. ~)C.tc. ... \o(" '->\\\ ~\",\...A. ... b .... IJI"~\"" 0(" 1o.>60C. Cor "' ...... ",~\<o.,,'\c... What views in the immediate vicinity would be altered O( obstructed?, __ ~) leo S+"'" Co t-eA -{Irs\-{\aCo(" o..F'"+""" ~ wcu\o. "'0.,,(" 0-. ~ ':lhH~ ~l"", c IJ It...., 0 ~ E.cIo """,,,,," S A \oJ\... Proposed measures to reduce or control aesthetic impacts, if any: ~ J. s 1<> .\-,,\:.Q. t..u..,,~ur~S (('1.'"<(.''' ~'\ <'I.J,I/ ~~ ... "'c .... < 11. LIGHT AND GLARE a. What type of light or glare will the proposal produce? What time of day would it mainly occur? n c>"'" -'<.. b. Could light or glare from the finished project be a safety hazard or interfere with views? "-JD Q:\ WEB\PW\DEVSER V\Forrns\Planning\envchlst.doc 8 , . . , ., c. What existing off-site sources of light or glare may affect your proposal? () 0(\ R.. d. Proposed measures to reduce or control light and glare impacts, if any: no 12. RECREATION a. What designated and informal recreational opportunities are in the immediate vicinity? ""'-f"c. Q, ..... 10.+'" c..o""'''''v''''~ (~ ... +c.f"'" c..V\6. po...,\<"'i ..... ,t-\..''''' 2. ~OC:>H o+-~r":lc.c.. t. b. Would the proposed project displace any existing recreational uses? If so, describe. no c. Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts on recreation, including recreation opportunities to be provided by the project or applicant, if any: 1'\0"" IS p ..... p0'\.cc\ 13. HISTORIC AND CULTURAL PRESERVATION a. Are there any places or objects listed on':-"or proposed for, national state, or local preservation registers known to be on or next to the site? If so, generally describe. b. Generally describe any landmarks or evidence of historic, archaeological, scientific, or cultural importance known to be on or next to the site. () 61"\ t-. c. Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts, if any: Y"\ o"'~ ':V-oIL f'r.f'c'\~ 14. TRANSPORTATION a. Identify public streets and highways serving the site, and describe proposed access to the existing street system. Show on site plans, if any. " i>{"OJe.c.~ \ S ?(()?ost'oI;'c:. o..(<."'S.S .('1'"0 ....... ~c\W\.CW'I~S M"~, b. Is site currently served by public transit? If not, what is the approximate distance to the nearest transit stop? V,f S I 'C I 00 ~ -+ , c. How many parking spaces would the completed project have? How many would the project eliminate? 'Proj e.d WI I' :p~ov\dlQ.. 1"2.. c:... 0\.1 ~r<.." ?c....rl<.\\,,) S p~c..,,-S Q:\WEBIPW\DEVSERV\FonnslPlanning\envchlst.doc 9 r d. Will the proposal require any new roads or streets, or improvements to existing roads or streets, not including driveways? If so, generally describe (indicate whether public or private? nO e. Will the project use (or occur in the immediate vicinity of) water, rail, or air transportation? If so, generally describe. ('\.0 f. How many vehicular trips per day would be generated by the completed project? If known, indicate when peak volumes would occur. me rr\~ Clr-.<1..-lo-.+e.. c>-. { W",,,,or, J g. Proposed measures to reduce or control transportation impacts, if any: (10'1'\..(.. o,.r t prO\::> 00; e&, 15. PUBLIC SERVICES a. Would the project result in an increased need for public services (for example: fire protection, police protection, health care, schools; other)? If so, generally describe. N"+ +0 M.y t.V'o"'-l\~Ii~ ~:: b. Proposed measures to reduce or control direct impacts on public services, if any. /") 0,,", t.. ~I"'t. P r 0f'e!> sed. 16. UTILITIES a. Circle ilities c available at the site: €ctri~ @Ural ~ refuse service, e ephone anitary sewe , septic system, oth . ~ b. Describe the utilities that are proposed for the project, the utility providing the service, and the general construction activiti~ on the site or in the immediate viCinity w~ch mi£tht be '\ needed. (\~c..t-""\~ (pst), ..,"'·hH· .... \ "',c,.S (1"S~)I"-''''-~e.r<.'' ~ ",-"h"') I -5Go.V\\-\-<..ori S~ (.,~~ .. II r .",~'l. -l'e.I .... "'I"" .. "..L <.. ... v .... +-~ C. SIGNATURE I, the undersigned, state that to the best of my knowledge the above information is true and complete. It is understood that the lead agency may withdraw any declaration of non-significance that it might issue in reliance upon this checklist should there be any willful misrepresentation or willful lack of full disclosure on my part. Proponent: ~(£~t- Name Printed: f-lI.vt>OSh. ~ -z ,,"~ k.; Date: Q:\ WEBIPWlDEVSER V\FormslPlanning\envchlst.doc 10 •• -. DATE: TO: FROM: SUBJECT: CITY OF RENTON FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU MEMORANDUM February 2, 2004 Susan Fiala, Senior Planner I , OJ Jim Gray, Assistant Fire Marsh~if· v Pazooki Project, 972 Edmonds Ave NE Fire Department Comments: 1. The preliminary Fire flow is determined by the total building square footage, type of construction and setbacks on all sides. This information is required to determine the fire flow. One fire hydrant will be required within 150 feet of the building and additional hydrants within 300 feet of the building based on the fire flow requirements. 2. A fire mitigation fee of $2,328.00 is required based on $388.00 per / unit. 3. Separate plans and permits are required for sprinkler and fire alarm J systems if installed 4. Fire department access roads are a minimum 20-foot paved width. / 5. Street addresses shall be visible from the public street.J Please feel free to con tact me if you have any questions. cny OF RENTON RECEIVED FEB 0 Z 2004 MEMORANDUM BUILDING DIVISION DATE: \-;;)'K-Oy TO: Construction Services, Fire Prevention, Plan Review, EDNSP, Project Planner FROM: Neil Watts, Development Services Division Director SUBJECT: New Preliminary Application: 30.. --z...w\<, ±k ~c".\· LOCATION: en ~ E.d '('r\onds ~e. PREAPP NO. OY, -<:) \ tj- A meeting with the applicant has been scheduled for \,00 , Thursday, "). -\ '\ -2s:00'-\ , in one of the 6111 floor conference rooms (new City Hall). If this meeting is scheduled at 10:00 AM, the MEETING MUST BE CONCLUDED PRIOR TO 11 :00 AM to allow time to prepare for the 11 :00 AM meeting. Please review the attached project plans prior to the scheduled meeting with the applicant. You will not need to do a thorough ·permitlevel" review at this time. Note only major Issues that must be resolved priorto formal land use and/or building permit application submittal. . Plan Reviewer assigned is rI\\ (JAe;p ,) Please submit your written comments to S . QQ<\ least two (2) days before the meeting. Thank you. ' H:\Division.s\Develop.serlDev & Plan.inglTemplatelPreapp2 Revised 9/00 (Planner) at To: From: Date: Subject: CITY OF RENTON MEMO PUBLIC WORKS Susan Fiala.,M' L Mike Dotson, IIfll"'- February 13, 2004 PreApplication Review Comments PREAPP No. 04-014 Pazooki Project -972 Edmonds Ave NE NOTE ON PRELIMINARY REVIEW COMMENTS CONTAINED IN THIS REPORT: The following comments on development and permitting issues are based on the pre-application submittals made to the City of Renton by the applicant. The applicant is cautioned that information contained in this summary m.1Y be subject to modification and/or concurrence by official decision makers (e.g. Hearing Examiner, Boards of Adjustment, Board of Public \Vorks and City Council). Review comments may also need to be revised based on site planning and other design changes required by the City or made by the applicant. I have reviewed the preliminary application for this redevelopment. located at 972 Edmonds Ave NE, and have the following comments. WATER 1. The site is currently served by City of Renton water. There are existing 10" and I G" water Illles adjacent to this site. 2. The project site is located in the 435-water pressure zone. The site is inside Zone 2 of the Aqui fer Protection Area. 3. Fire Flow available to the site is approximately 4800 gpm. Static water pressure is approximately 70 psi. 4. Fire flow requirements may dictate additional hydrants for the site. In addition. per the City of Renton Code requirements, fire !low in excess of 2,500 gpm will require a main whieh loops around the building or complex of buildings and reeonnects to the main distribution system. 5. A Water System development Charge (SDC) of $1,525.00 per new single-family residence is due at time of issuance of a constnlction permit. SANITARY SEWER I. The site is eurrently served by City of Renton sewer. There is an 8" sewer adjacent to this site. 2. If the redevelopment of the site includes construction of the single-family townhouse type developments, then individual side sewers would be required for each separate single-family lImt. 3. i\ Sewer Syslem Development Charge (SDC) of $900.00 per new single-family reSIdence is due at time of construction permit. Pazooki Project -972 Edmvllds A vt: I'J'E 02/13/2004 Page 2 SURFACE WATER 1. A project narrative and' Level One' analysis according to the King County 1990 Surface Watcr Design Manual may be required depending on the final site plan. = 2. If there are no changes proposed for the current on-site drainage system, then the project may not require new drainage facilities. However any new required drainage facilities will be required to meet the City or Renton drainage standards (King County 1990 Surface Water Design Manual). 3. A Surface Water System Development Charge (SOC) in the amount of $715.00 per new single-family residence is due at time of construction pemlit. STREET IMPROVEMENTS I. Per City of Renton code, new development is required to install street improvements per the current standards. This project may require (if not already installed) curb, gutter, street lighting and sidewalks, along the street frontage of the project. 2. Any new electrical, phone and cable services must be underground. Construction of these franchise utilities must' be inspected and approved by a City of Renton public works . inspector prior to final occupancy. 3. A traffic impact study may be required. Ingress and Egress issues will be reviewed at time of formal submittal. 4. Traffic Mitigation fee of $75 per additional trip generated shall be assessed. This is a one- time fee collected at the time of building permit. GENERAL COMMENTS I. Permit application will required separate plan submittals for any proposed utility, drainage and street improvements. Plans are required to be prepared by a licensed Civil Engineer according to City of Renton drafting standards. 2. Pennit application must also include an estimate cost of construction for water, sewer and roadway/drainagc improvements (please sec permit application available at the 6'" floor Customer Service Counter). The cost estimate will be used to calculate the fee(s) due for review and inspection of the utility improvements. (For your information, fees are calculated on the following basis: 5% of the first $100,000 of the estimated construction costs; 4% of the amount between $100,000 and $200,000. and 3')'0 of anything over $200,000. Half the fee must be paid upon permit application.) 3. The applicant is responsible for securing any private utility easements. cc: Kayren Kittrick C:\Pl,1I1 Review\pazooki project.doc CITY OF RENTON ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT NEIGHBORHOODS, AND STRATEGIC PLANNING MEMORANDUM DATE: February 13,2004 TO: Susan Fiala FROM: Rebe~~d STAFF CONTACT: Don Erickson SUBJECT: Pazooki Project, 972 Edmonds Avenue NE; PRE 04-014 The applicant is proposing to develop a 13,503 square foot site with two duplexes each containing three units. The applicant has stated that their intent is to develop the triplexes as three townhouse units each and then to short plat the development into six lots so that each unit has its own identifiable tax lot. The .31 acre site is designated Multi-family Infili on the Comprehensive Plan Land Use Map and zoned RM-C. It appears that the applicant intends to locate parking beneath the units with the living are above. The proposed townhouses would be approximately 33-feet square under this proposal. A common access road would divide the two three unit buildings. The subject site is located to the west of District C of the Suburban and Neighborhood Center Residential Bonus Districts. Attached are relevant land use policies. Analysis: Whereas it would be legal to short plat the site into six lots assuming each tax lot had bonafide access, minimum width and appropriate turnarounds, it would not now be legal to build zero lot line townhouses in this zone since lots would have to be at least G5-fect deep and have a minimum 15-foot deep rear yard and 20 foot deep front yard. Except in the RM-T zone lots less than 50 feet in width are required to have side yard setbacks of at least 5-feet. Since the applicant's proposal shows only II-foot rear yards, zero setback between attached buildings, and II-foot front yards, it does not appear that the applicant's proposal for townhouses on zero setback side lot lines is feasible. Recommendation: Do not support this application as currently proposed. The applicant should be encouragecl to provide more definitive submittal materials such as building elevations and typical unit floor plans when they resubmit. Attachment cc: Don Erickson Pazooki Project, 972 Edmv"ds f\Vcnue; PRE 04-014 Relevant Comprehensive Plan Land Use Policies Residential Multi-family -In/ill: Policy LU-65. New development in Residential Multi-family Infill designations should be compatible in size, scale, bulk, use, and design with other existing multi-family developments. 2 Policy LU-66. Design standards should be applied that reflect present development patterns and are sensitive to unique features and differences among established neighborhoods. Standards should address, but not be limited to: I) building height, width, and length; 2) front, side, and rear yard setbacks; 3) maximum lot coverage; 4) location of driveways, garages, alld parking areas; 5) number of garages and off-site parking spaces; 6) roofline; and 7) compatibility with adjacent uses. Policy LU-67. Siting and design of new structures should be sensitive to site constraints and adjacent ilses. Provision of adequate buffers or setbacks or scaling down building heights may be required to transition from Residential Multi-family Infill designations to adjacent lower density uses. Policy LU-6S. Adequate green spaces, recreation, design amenities, signing and lighting should be determined as part of the site planning process. Allowable densities should be based on meeting these objectives. Community Design: Policy LU-305. The design of buildings alld surrounding environlllent should be compatible with surrounding recent urban design. Policy LU-307. Ensure thm development relates, COllnects, and contillues design quality (lnd site functiolls from parcel to parcel. Policy LU-30S. Iiooftof's should be designed to be visually attractive where they are visible from adjacent buildings or ro(ulwnys. \\DAEDA LUS\SY S 2\5 II ,\ RED\EDNSP\In ll'rdcp:ll t Illen ta I\Devc!opment Review\Prcapps\Comments\RM f\Pazooki Mil lti-fami 11' Projccl.doc\d CITY OF RENTON Planning/Building/Public Works MEMORANDUM DATE: February 19, 2004 TO: Pre-Application File No. 04-014 FROM: Kristina Caliin, Associate Planner, x7270 SUBJECT: Pazooki Project General: We have completed a preliminary review of the pre-application for the above- referenced development proposal. The following comments on development and permitting issues are based on the pre-application submittals made to the City of Renton by the applicant and the codes in effect on the date of review. The applicant is cautioned that information contained in this summary may be subject to modification andlor concurrenc,e by official decision-makers (e.g., Hearing Examiner, Zoning Administrator, Board of Adjustment, Board of Public Works, and City Council). Review comments may also need to be revised based on site planning and other design changes required by City staff or made by the applicant. The applicant is encouraged to review all applicable sections of the Renton Municipal Code. The Development Regulations are available for purchase for $50. plus tax. from the Finance Division on the first floor of City Hall or on-line at www.ci.renton.wa.us. Project Proposal: The subject site is located at 972 Edmonds Avenue NE. According to King County Assessor Records, the site is currently developed with an approximately 620 square foot single-family residence. The project proposal is to demolish the existing structure and develop the site with two triplexes for a total of 6 units on the property. The applicant indicated an intention to create separate parcels for each unit. Access to the development is proposed from Edmonds Avenue NE via a shared driveway. ZoninglDensity Requirements: The subject property is located within the Residential Multi-family -Suburban Center (RM-C) zoning designation. The density range required in the RM-C zone is a minimum of 10 to a maximum of 20 dwelling units per acre (dulac). In 0 rder to calculate net density. critical a reas and private access easements serving three or more dwellings must be deducted from the gross area of the property. Based on King County Assessor data. the gross area of the property is approximately 13.503 square feet (0.31 acres). If the two tri-plexes are constructed on the existing lot, there would be no areas to deduct. In that case, six units on the site would result in a density of 19.35 dwelling units per acre (6/ 0.31 = 19.35), which is within the permitted density range of the RM-C zone. If individual lots are created. however. a . private street may be required and the area of the private street serving three or more units would be deducted from the gross square footage of the site prior to calculating density. Based on staff calculations, if more than 435 square feet of the access easement served three or more units, six units on this parcel would exceed the maximum density of the zone. Pazooki Project Pre·application Meetirt\:l File No. 04-014 February 19, 2004 Page 2 of 3 Development Standards: The development of the site would require compliance with the applicable standards of the RM-C zone and parking regulations as discussed below: Setbacks -Setbacks are measured from the property lines to the nearest pOint of the structure. The required setbacks in the RM-C zone are 20 feet in the front, 15 feet in the rear, 20 feet side yard along a street. Interior side yard setbacks are based on the width of the subject lot. The following side setbacks apply: Lot width: 50.1 to 60 ft. Yard setback: 6 ft. Lot width: 60.1 to 70 ft. Yard setback: 7 ft. Lot width: 70.1 to 80 ft. Yard setback: 8 ft. Lot width: 80.1 to 90 ft. Yard setback: 9 ft. Lot width 90.1 to 100 ft. Yard setback: 10 ft. Lot width 100.1 to 110ft. Yard setback: 11 ft. Lot width: 110.1+ ft. Yard setback: 12 ft. If the lot remains in its current condition, it would be 105 feet wide and require an 11-foot side yard setback along the north and south property lines, The site plan submitted shows an 11-foot side setback, which meets the requirements based on the width of the existing lot. If the lot were divided. the side setback would vary based on the lot width. It should also be noted, that if the proposed structures exceed two stories in height an additional one-foot setback is required. If the property were subdivided into individual lots under each unit, the structures would be unable to comply with the required side yard setback along the shared property line(s). As proposed, the development does not meet the side yard setback requirements of the RM-C' zone and, therefore, could not be approved. It is possible that the development could meet the setback requirements if two individual lots were created for each of the tri-plexes (instead of each individual unit). See attached drawing. Building Height -The RM-C zone restricts building height to 35 feet and 3 stories. See above discussion for additional setback requirements for structures over 2 stories. Staff could not verify compliance with the height restrictions, as no building elevations were submitted. Lot Coverage -Lot coverage by buildings is limited to a maximum of 45%, In addition, a maximum of 75% of the lot area may be covered with impervious surfaces (i.e. building footprints, sidewalks, and driveways). At the time of formal application the plans will need to indicate the building footprint areas as well as areas of impervious surface so that staff may verify compliance with the building lot coverage and impervious surface limitations. Landscaping -The RM-C zone requires all setback and open space areas to be landscaped. All landscaped areas must include an underground irrigation system. A landscape plan would be required as part of the Site Plan Review application. Parking/Access -Parking in the RM-C zone is limited to underground or within a structure, unless otherwise approved through the site plan review process. A minimum of 2 off-street parking stalls per unit would be required (2.5 parking spaces if tandem parking is provided). The parking regulations specify standard stall dimensions of 9 feet x 20 feet and compact dimensions of 8Y, feet x 16 feet. Compact spaces are not allowed to exceed 30% of the required spaces and must be marked. An aisle width of 24 feet is required for all one-way or two-way 90 degree parking stalls. Pazooki (R~l-C 6-unit).rJlX\ Pazooki Project Pre-application MeetlflY File No. 04-014 February 19, 2004 Page 3 of 3 Staff could not determine if this proposal complied with the parking code requirements. A parking analysis will be required with the Site Plan Review application. Critical Areas: No environmentally sensitive areas were found on this site. No further review is requested at this time. Permit Requirements: The construction of a residential structure of more than four dwelling units requires Environmental (SEPA) Review. As proposed, the cumulative development proposed on site is six units, which would be subject to Environmental Review. All development in the Residential Multi-Family zone not exempted from Environmental Review requires Site Plan Review. Environmental (SEPA) Review and Site Plan Review can be processed simultaneously in an estimated time frame of 6 to 8 weeks. If the applicant proposes to divide the existing lot into smaller lots, an Administrative Short Plat will be required. An Administrative Short Plat could also be processed in an estimated time frame of 6 to 8 weeks. The application fee for j oint land use applications is full price for the most expensive permit (Administrative Site Plan Review $1,000) and half off any subsequent permits ($500 for the Environmental Review and/or Administrative Short Plat). In addition, first class postage (currently $0.37) for each mailing label would be required for notification to surrounding property owners. Detailed information regarding the land use application submittal is provided in the attached handouts. Fees: In addition to the applicable building and construction permit fees, the fOllowing mitigation fees would be required prior to the issuance of building permits. Credit would be given for the existing residence. • A Transportation Mitigation Fee based on $75.00 per each new average daily trip attributed to the project; • A Parks Mitigation Fee based on $354.51 per each multi-family unit; and, • A Fire Mitigation Fee based on $388.00 per each multi-family unit. A handout listing all of the City's Development related fees in attached for your review. cc: Jennifer Henning P<lzooki (Rl\l-C (,-llnit)_do~'\ , .. Issued By DEVELOPMENT PLANNING CITY OF RENTON JUN t 0 2004 RECEIVED LAWYE·RS TTITLE AGENCY OF WASHINGTON 21012 CIO~lby AveU1llUle 0 IEvel1'e~~, WA 982011 425.252.1222 15011 4~1hl AveU1llUle, SIUl~~e 30lS 0 Sea~~~e, WA 98101 20l6.233.0l30l0l Form 1004-251 C (Rev. 04103) ORIGINAL Lawyers Title Insurance Corporation, a Virginia Corporation, herein called the Company, for a valuable consideration, hereby commits to issue its policy or policies of title insurance, as identified in Schedule A, in favor of the proposed Insured named in Schedule A, as owner or mortgagee of the estate or interest covered hereby in the land described or referred to in Schedule A, upon payment of the premiums and charges therefor; all subject to the exceptions and conditions and stipulations shown herein, the Exclusions from Coverage, the Schedule B exceptions, and the conditions and stipulations of the policy or policies requested. (See reverse side of this cover and inside of back cover for printed Exclusions from Coverage and Schedule B exceptions contained in various policy forms.) This Commitment shall be effective only when the identity of the proposed Insured and the amount of the policy or policies committed for have been inserted in Schedule A hereof by the Company, either at the time of the issuance of this Commitment or by subsequent endorsement and is subject to the Conditions and Stipulations on the back of this cover. This Commitment is preliminary to the issuance of such policy or policies of title insurance and all liability and obligations hereunder shall cease and terminate 180 days after the effective date hereof or when the policy or policies committed for shall issue, whichever first occurs, provided that the failure to issue such policy or policies is not the fault of the Company. LAWYERS TITLE INSURANCE CORPORATION Attest c:/ cA-v. V d- -_ ................... ", ----,,,SUR.4.yc. \'ltl ; ........................ F co', .. ~... . .. ~" ; ....... _.-\"O~ I~! *t":'£~ 'wI i~~. 1.--:$£ J~' By. ~t~\. 1925 ./~! S t ry',-·, , .. _ ecre a "I .;, .............. ~. r "\ ~CItItO"O._4" \\,,"-.. ~ ... ?t~(J. ~ NOTE: THE POLICY COMMITTED FOR MAY BE EXAMINED BY INQUIRY AT THE OFFICE OF LAWYERS TITLE AGENCY Of WAS~INGTON AND A SPECIMEN COPY OF THE POLICY FORM (OR FORMS) REFERRED TO IN THIS COMMITMENT WILL BE FURNISHED PROMPTLY UPON REQUEST. LAWYERS TITLE AGENCY OF WASHINGTON IS AN ISSUING AGENT FOR LAWYERS TITLE INSURANCE CORPORATION, a LandAmerica company " o L President , • .' • Lawyers Title Agency of Washington Eastside Title Unit Shawna R. Cruikshank, Sr. Title Officer, Unit Manager Bill Quast, Sr. Title Officer • Donald Peterson, Title Officer Suzanne Desseau, Title Officer' Joann Leadley, Assistant Title Officer Direct: (425) 283-1420 • Fax: (425) 637-9820 Email: etu@lawyerstitlewa.com 1501 4th Avenue, #308. Seattle, Washington 98101 SCHEDULE A To: Solutions Financial Group, Inc, 6100 Southcenter Blvd, #250 Tukwila, Washington 98188 Order Number: 357647 Your Reference:' Attn: Amir Pazooki 3/1 Zureen Khan L Effective Date: MAY 27, 2004 at 8:00 AM 2. Policy Or Policies To Be Issued: (X) ALTA Loan Policy, (10/17/92) Refinance Rate ( ) Standard ( X ) Extended Amount: Premium: Tax: Proposed Insured: Solutions Financial Group, Inc. $100,000,00 $275,00 $22,83 3. The estate or interest in the land is described or referred to in this Commitment and covered herein is: Fee Simple 4. Title to said estate or interest in said land is at the effective date hereof vested in: A3 Investments, LIe, a Limited Liability Company 5. The land referred to in this commitment is described in Exhibit A. Lawyers Title Agenc~ of Washington, Agent for Lawyers Title Insurance Corporation Shawn a R. Cruikshank, Sr. Title Officer, Unit Manager Pagelof6 . Order Number: 357647 , • .. •• EXHIBIT A That portion of the Northwest quarter of the Northwest quarter of the Southwest quarter of the Northwest quarter of Section 9, Township 23 North, Range 5 East, W.M., in King County, Washington, described as follows: BEGINNING at the Southwest quarter of the of the East half of said subdivision; THENCE North along the West line of said East half315.35 feet to the TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE West along a line parallel with the South line of said subdivision to an intersection with a line parallel with and 30 feet East of the West line of said Section 9; THENCE South along said parallel line 105 feet; THENCE East along a line parallel with the South line of said subdivision to the West line of the East half of said Subdivision; THENCE North along said West line 105 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING. End of Schedule A Page 2 of6 . Order Number: 357647 • • • SCHEDULEBI I. The following are the requirements to be complied with: A. Payment to or for the account of the grantors or mortgagors of the full consideration for the estate or interest to be insured. B. Proper instrument(s) creating the estate or interest to be insured must be executed and duly filed for record. NOTE: FORMAT: Effective January I, 1997, and pursuant to amendment of Washington state statutes relating to standardization of recorded documents, the following format and content requirements must be met. Failure to comply may result in rejection of the document by the recorder. Margins to be 3" on top of first page, 1" on sides and bottom, I" on top, sides and bottom of each succeeding page. Font size of 8 points or larger and paper size of no more than 8 y," by 14". No attachments on pages such as stapled or taped notary seals, pressure seals must be smudged. INFORMA nON WHICH MUST APPEAR ON THE FIRST PAGE: Title or titles of document. If assignment or reconveyance, reference to auditor's file number or subject deed of trust. Names of grantor(s) and grantee(s) with reference to additional names on following page(s), if any. Abbreviated legal description (lot, block, plat name or section, township, range and quarter section for unplatted). Assessor's tax parcel number(s). Return address which may appear in the upper left hand 3" top margin. II. Schedule B of the policy or policies to be issued will contain exceptions to the following matters unless the same are disposed of the satisfaction of the Company: A. Defects, liens, encumbrances, adverse claims or other matters, if any, created, first appearing in the public records, or attaching subsequent to the effective date hereof but prior to the date the proposed Insured acquires of record for value the estate or interest or mortgage thereon covered by this commitment. B. Any policy issued pursuant hereto will contain the Exclusions From Coverage and, under Schedule B, the standard exceptions as set forth and identified as to the type of policy on the attached Schedul~s of Exclusions & Exceptions. End of Schedule Bl Page 3 of6 Order Number: 357647 • -• SCHEDVLEB2 Special Exceptions: 1. General taxes and charges: I" half delinquent May I, if not paid; 20d half delinquent November I, if not paid. Year: Amount billed: Amount paid: Amount due: Tax account no.: Levy code: Assessed value of land: Assessed value of improvements: 2004 $1,651.09 $825.55 $825.54 092305-9131-02 2100 $74,000.00 $69,000.00 2. The matters relating to the questions of survey, rights of parties in possession, and unrecorded liens for labor and material have been cleared for the loan policy which, when issued, will contain the 100 endorsement. 3. The legal description in this commitment is based upon information provided with the application for title insurance and the public records as defined in the policy to issue. The parties to the forthcoming transaction must notify the title insurance company, prior to closing, if the description does not conform to their expectations. 4. Evidence should be submitted which shows that A3 Investments, Inc. is a duly authorized business entity, together with evidence of the identity and authority of the parties who will execute the forthcoming instruments for the named entity. 5. Agreements, covenants, conditions and restrictions, if any, appearing in the public records. 6. Any easements or servitudes appearing in the public records. 7. Any leases, grants, exceptions or reservations of minerals or mineral rights appearing in the public records. End of Schedule B2 Page 4 of6 . Order Number: 357647 • Notes: A. Abbreviated Legal Description: 9-23-5, ptn SWINW B. Property Address: 972 Edmonds Ave NE Renton, Washington 98056 • C. Investigation should be made to determine ifthere are any service, installation, maintenance or construction charges for sewer, water, telephone, gas, electricity or garbage and refuse collection. D. In the event this transaction fails to close, a cancellation fee will be charged for services' rendered in accordance with our rate schedule. E. Unless otherwise requested, the forms of policy to be issued in connection with this commitment will be ALTA 1992 policies, or, in the case of standard lender's coverage, the CL T A Standard Coverage Policy-1990. The Owner's Policy will automatically include the Additional Coverage Endorsement, when applicable, at no additional charge. The Policy committed for or requested may be examined by inquiry at the office which issued the commitment. A specimen copy of the policy formes) referred to in this commitment will be furnished promptly upon request. Page 5 of6 . Order Number: 357647 • • • LT LA ~YER-S TITLE AGENCY OF VVASHINGTON PRIVACY POLICY We Are Committed to Safeguarding Customer Information In order to better serve your needs now and in the future, we may ask you to provide us with certain infonnation. We understand tha~'ou may . be concerned about what we will do with such information-particularly any personal or financial information. We agree that you have a right to know how we will utilize the personal i~formation you provide to us, Therefore, we have adopted thiilrivacy Policy to govern the use.and handling afyour perSonal information. Applicability Depending upon which of our services you are utilizing, the types of non public personal information that we may collect include: • Information we receive from you on !Jlplications, forms and in other communications to us, whether in writing, in person, by telephone or any other means; • Information about your transactions with us, our affiliated companies, or others, and • Information we receive from a consumer reporting agncy. Use of Information We request information from you for your own legitimate business purposes and not for the benefit of any nonaffiliated party. Therefore, we will not release your information to nonaffiliated parties except: (I) as necessary forus to provide the product or services you have requested of us; or (2) as permitted by law. We may, however, store such information indefinitely, induding the period after which any customer relationship has ceased. Such information may be used for any internal purpose, such as quality control efforts or customer analysis. We may also provide all of the types of non public personal information listed above to one or more of aUf affiliated companies. Such affiliated companies include financial service providers, such as title insurers, property and casualty insurers, and trust and investment advisory companies, or companies involved in real estate services, such as appraisal companies, home warranty companies and escrow companies. Furthermore, we may alscprovide all the infonnation we collect, as described above, to companies that perform marketing services on our behalf, on behalf of our affiliated companies, or to other financial institutions with whom we or our affiliated companies have joint marketingagreements. Former Customers Even if you are no longer our customer, our Privacy Policy will continue to apply to you. Confidentiality and Security We will use our best efforts to ensure that no unauthorized parties have access to any of your inforrmitm. We restrict access to non public personal information about you to those individuals and entities who need to know that information to provide products or services to you. We will use our best efforts to train and oversee our employees and agents tcensure that your information will be handled responsibly and in accordance with this Privacy Policy. We currently maintain phYSical, electronic, and procedural safeguards that comply with federal regulations to guard your nonpublic personal information. Page 6 of6 . Order Number: 357647 • • U\ \VYER.5 1T11£ /v( ... "t.:-<\::y er \\:'\:'i!)'fLNCTC,"l Order No. 1-£llcJ--\l " , ~ • " 1 • tJJ$J ., .. : ~ " .,,,, • lawyers Titie Agency of Washington 2702 Colby Avenue, Everett, WA 98201 \\,' " 'ii '" ," t ,2,. " /oJ-89·4!·.".b"N , ..; ,~,,, • " I/O,Jl. .; '< N 7 ~ ... D-~ • HZ 0 • • " 8 .; \...J!~. ~3"O • , 10';'6 , This sketch is .provided without charge, for your information. It is not intended to show ail matters related to the propmy including, but not limited to: area, dimensions, easements, encroachments or location of boundaries. It is not a pat of, nor does it modify, the commitment/policy to which it is anached. The Company assumes NO LIABILITY for allY matter related to this sketch. Reference should be made to an accurate survey for funher information ".. --'-, .. ---,_.--.-----.----./ ...• COMMITMENT CONDITIONS AND STIPULATIONS 1. The term mortgage, when used herein, shall include deed of trust, trust deed, or other security instrument. 2. If the proposed insured has or acquires actual knowledge of any defect, lien, encumbrance, adverse claim or other matter affecting the estate or interest or mortgage thereon covered by this Commitment other than those shown in Schedule B hereof, and shall fail to disclose such knowledge to the Company in writing, the Company shall be relieved from liability for any loss or damage resulting from any act of reliance hereon to the extent the Company is prejudiced by failure to so disclose such knowledge. If the proposed insured shall disclose such knowledge to the Company, or if the Company otherwise acquires actual knowledge of any such defect, lien, encumbrance, adverse claim or other maller, the Company at its option may amend Schedule B of this Commitment accordingly, but such amendment shall not relieve the Company from liability previously incurred pursuant to paragraph 3 of these Conditions and Stipulations. 3. Liability of the Company under this Commitment shall be only to the named proposed insured and such parties included under the definition of insured in the form of policy or policies commilled for and only for.actualloss incurred in reliance hereon in undertaking in good faith, (a) to comply with the requirements hereof, or (b) to eliminate exceptions shown in Schedule B, or (c) to acquire or create the estate or interest or mortgage thereon covered by this Commitment. In no event shall such liability exceed the amount stated in Schedule A for the policy or policies committed for and such liability is subject to the insuring provisions, the Conditions and Stipulations, and the Exclusions from Coverage of the form of policy or policies committed for in favor of the proposed insured which are hereby incorporated by reference and are made a part of this Commitment except as expressly modified herein. 4. Any action or actions or rights of action that the proposed insured may have or may bring against the Company arising out of the status of the title to the estate or interest or the status of the mortgage thereon covered by this Commitment must be based on and are subject to the provisions of this Commitment. SCHEDULE OF EXCLUSIONS FROM COVERAGE The mailers listed below each policy form are expressly excluded from the coverage of that policy and the Company will not pay loss or damage, costs, attorneys' fees or expenses which arise by reason thereof. AMERICAN LAND TITLE ASSOCIATION LOAN POLICY (10117192) 1. (a) Any law, ordinance or governmental regulation (including but not limited to building and zoning laws, ordinances, or regulations) restricting, regulating, prohibiting or relating to (i) the occupancy, use, or enjoyment of the land; (ii) the character, dimensions or location of any improvement now or hereafter erected on the land; (iii) a separation in ownership or a change in the dimensions or area of the land or any parcel of which the land is or was a part; or (iv) environmental protection, or the effect of any violation of these laws, ordinances or governmental regulations, except to the extent that a notice of the enforcement thereof or a notice of a defect, lien or encumbrance resulting from a violation or alleged violation affecting the land has been recorded in the public records at Date of Policy, (b) Any governmental police power not excluded by (a) above, except to the extent that a notice of the exercise thereof or a notice of a defect, lien or encumbrance resulting from a violation or alleged violation affecting the land has been recorded in the public records at Date of Policy. 2. Rights of eminent domain unless notice of the exercise thereof has been recorded in the public records at Date of Policy, but not excluding from coverage any taking which has occurred prior to Date of Policy which would be binding on the rights of a purchaser for value without knowledge. 3. Defects, liens, encumbrances, adverse claims or other matters: (a) created, suffered, assumed or agreed to by the insured claimant; (b) not known to the Company, not recorded in the public records at Date of Policy, but known to the insured claimant and not disclosed in writing to the Company by the insured claimant prior to the date the insured claimant became an insured under this policy; (c) resulting in no loss or damage to the insured claimant; (d) attaching or created subsequent to Date of Policy (except to the extent that this policy insures the priority of the lien of the insured mortgage over any statutory lien for services, labor or material); or (e) resulting in loss or damage which would not have been sustained if the insured claimant had paid value for the insured mortgage. 4. Unenforceability of the lien of the insured mortgage because of the inability or failure of the insured at Date of Policy, or the inability or failure of any subsequent owner of the indebtedness, to comply with applicable dOing business laws of the state in which the land is situated. 5. Invalidity or unenforceability of the lien of the insured mortgage, or claim thereof, which arises out of the transaction evidenced by the insured mortgage and is based upon usury or any consumer credit protection or truth-in-Iending law. 6. Any statutory lien for services, labor or materials (or the claim of priority of any statutory lien for services, labor or materials over the tien of the insured mortgage) arising from an improvement or work related to the land which is contracted for and commenced subsequent to Date of Policy and is not financed in whole or in part by proceeds of the indebtedness secured by the insured mortgage which at Date of Policy the insured has advanced or is obligated to advance. 7. Any claim, which arises out of the transaction creating the interest of the mortgage insured by this policy, by reason of the operation of federal bankruptcy, state insolvency, or similar creditors' rights laws, that is based on: (a) the transaction creating the interest of the insured mortgagee being deemed a fraudulent conveyance or fraudulent transfer; or (b) the subordination of the interest of the insured mortgagee as a result of the application of the doctrine of equitable subordination; or (c) the transaction creating the interest of the insured mortgagee being deemed a preferential transfer except where the preferential transfer results from the failure: (i) to timely record the instrument of transfer; or (ii) of such recordation to impart notice to a purchaser for value or a judgment or lien creditor. CLTA STANDARD COVERAGE LOAN POLICY 1990 1. (a) Any law, ordinance or governmental regulation (including but not limited to building or zoning laws, ordinances, or regulations) restricting, prohibiting regulating, or relating to (i) the occupancy, use, or enjoyment of the land; (Ii) the character, dimensions or location of any improvement now or hereafter erected on the land; (iii) a separation in ownership or a change in the dimensions or area of the land or any parcel of which the land is or was a part; or (iv) environmental protection, or the effect of any violation of these laws, ordinances or governmental regulations, except to the extent that a notice of the enforcement thereof or a notice of a defect, lien or encumbrance resulting from a violation or alleged violation affecting the land has been recorded in the public records at Date of Policy. (b) Any governmental police power not excluded by (a) above, except to the extent that a notice of the exercise thereof or a notice of a defect, lien or encumbrance resulting from a violation or alleged violation affecting the land has been recorded in the public records at Date of Policy. 2. Rights of eminent domain unless notice of the exercise thereof has been recorded in the public records at Date of PoliCY, but not excluding from coverage any taking which has occurred prior to Date of Policy which would be binding on the rights of a purchaser for value without knowledge. 3. Defects, liens, encumbrances, adverse claims or other matters: (a) whether or not recorded in the public records at Date of Policy, but created, suffered, assumed or agreed to by the insured claimant; (b) not known to the Company, not recorded in the public records at Date of Policy, but known to the insured claimant and not disclosed in writing to the Company by the insured claimant prior to the date the insured claimant became an insured under this policy. (c) resulting in no loss or damage to the insured claimant; (d) attaching or created subsequent to Date of Policy: or (e) resulting in loss or damage which would not have been sustained if the insured claimant had paid value for the insured mortgage or for the estate or interest insured by this policy. 4. Unenforceability of the lien of the insured mortgage because of the inability or failure of the insured at Date of Policy, or the inability or failure of any subsequent owner of the indebtedness, to comply with the applicable doing business laws of the state in which the land is situated. 5. Invalidity or unenforceability of the lien of the insured mortgage, or claim thereof, which arises out of the transaction evidenced by the insured mortgage and is based upon usury or any consumer credit protection or truth-in-Iending law. 6. Any claim, which arises out of the transaction vesting in the insured the estate or interest insured by this policy or the transaction creating the interest of the insured lender, by reason of the operation of federal bankruptcy, state insolvency or similar creditors' rights laws. AMERICAN LAND TITLE ASSOCIATION OWNER'S POLICY (10117192) 1. (a) Any law, ordinance or governmental regulation (including but not limited to building and zoning laws, ordinances, or regulations) restricting, regulating, prohibiting or relating to (i) the occupancy, use, or enjoyment of the land; (ii) the character, dimensions or location of any improvement now or hereafter erected on the land; (iii) a separation in ownership or a change in the dimensions or area of the land or any parcel of which the land is or was a part; or (iv) environmental protection, or the affect of any violation of these laws, ordinances of governmental regulations, except to the extent that a notice of the enforcement thereof or a notice of a defect, lien or encumbrance resulting from a violation or alleged violation affecting the land has been recorded in the public records at Date of Policy. (b) Any governmental police power not excluded by (a) above, except to the extent that a notice of the exercise thereof or a notice of a defect, lien or encumbrance resulting from a violation or alleged violation affecting the land has been recorded in the public records at Date of Policy. 2. Rights of eminent domain unless notice of the exercise thereof has been recorded in the public records at Date of Policy, but not excluding from coverage any taking which has occurred prior to Date of Policy which would be binding on the rights of a purchaser for value without knowledge. 3. Defects, liens, encumbrances, adverse claims or other matters: (a) created, suffered, assumed or agreed to by the insured claimant; .. c (b) not known to the Company, not recorded in the public records at Date of Policy, but known to the insured claimant and not disclosed in writing to the Company by the insured claimant prior to the date the insured claimant became an insured under this policy; (c) resulting in no loss or damage to the insured claimant; (d) attaching or created subsequent to Date of Policy; or (e) resulting in loss or damage which would not have been sustained if the insured claimant had paid value for the estate or interest insured by this policy. 4. Any claim, which arises out of the transaction vesting in the Insured the estate or interest insured by this policy, by reason of the operation of federal bankruptcy, state insolvency, or similar creditors' rights laws, that is based on: (a) the transaction creating the estate or interest insured by this policy being deemed a fraudulent conveyance or fraudulent transfer; or (b) the transaction creating the estate or interest insured by this policy being deemed a preferential transfer except where the preferential transfer results from the failure: (i) to timely record the instrument of transfer; or (ii) of such recordation to impart notice to a purchaser for value or a judgment or lien creditor. AMERICAN LAND TITLE ASSOCIATION HOMEOWNER'S POLICY OF TITLE INSURANCE FOR A ONE-TO-FOUR FAMILY RESIDENCE (10/17/98) In addition to the Exceptions in Schedule B, You are not insured against loss, costs, attorneys' fees, and expenses resulting from: 1. Governmental police power, and the existence or violation of any law or government regulation. This includes ordinances, laws and regulations concerning: a. building b. zoning c. Land use d. improvements on the Land e. Land division f. environmental protection This Exclusion does not apply to violations or the enforcement of these matters if notice of the violation or enforcement appears in the Public Records at the Policy Date. This Exclusion does not limit the coverage described in Covered Risk 14, 15 16, 17 or 24. 2. The failure of Your existing structures, or any part of them, to be constructed in accordance with applicable building codes. This Exclusion does not apply to violations of building codes if notice of the violation appears in the Public Records at the Policy Date. 3. The right to take the Land by condemning it, unless: a. a notice of exercising the right appears in the Public Records at the Policy Date; or b. the taking happened before the Policy Date and is binding on You if You bought the Land without Knowing of the taking. 4. Risks: a. that are created, allowed, or agreed to by You, whether or not they appear in the Public records; b. that are Known to You at the Policy Date, but not to Us, unless they appeared in the Public Records at the Policy Date; c. that result in no loss to You; or d. that first occur after the Policy Date -this does not limit the coverage described in Covered Risk 7, B.d, 22, 23, 24 or 25. 5. Failure to pay value for Your Title. 6. lack of a right: a. to any Land outside the area specifically described and referred to in paragraph 3 of Schedule A; and b. in streets, alleys, or waterways that touch the Land. This Exclusion does not limit the coverage described in Covered Risk 11 or 18. SCHEDULE B GENERAL EXCEPTIONS The matters listed below each policy form are expressly excepted from the coverage of that policy and that policy does not insure against loss or damage (and the Company will not pay costs, attorneys' fees or expenses) which arise by reason thereof. SCHEDULE B EXCEPTIONS APPEARING IN ALTA OWNER'S POLICY -STANDARD COVERAGE AND ClTA STANDARD COVERAGE lOAN POLICY 1. Taxes or assessments which are not now payable or which are not shown as existing liens by the records of any taxing authority that levies taxes or assessments on real property or by the public records; proceedings by a public agency which may result in taxes or assessments, or notices of such proceedings, whether or not shown by the records of such agency or by the public records. 2. Any facts, rights, interests or claims which are not shown by the public records but which could be ascertained by an inspection of the land or which may be asserted by persons in possession, or claiming to be in possession thereof. 3. Easements, liens or encumbrances, or claims thereof, which are not shown by the public records. 4. Discrepancies, conflicts in boundary lines, shortage in area, encroachments, or any other facts which a correct survey of the land would disclose, and which are not shown by the public records, 5. Any lien, or right to a lien, for labor, material, services or equipment, or for contributions to employee benefit plans, or liens under workmen's compensation acts, not disclosed by the public records. 6. (a) Unpatented mining claims; (b) reservations or exceptions in patents or in Acts authorizing the issuance thereof; (c) Indian treaty or aboriginal rights, including, but not limited to, easements or equitable servitudes; or, (d) water rights, claims or tiUe to water, whether or not the matters excepted under (a), (b), (c) or (d) are shown by the public records. 7. Right of use, control or regulation by the United States of America in the exercise of powers over navigation', any prohibition or limitation on the use, occupancy or improvement of the land resulting from the rights of the public or riparian owners to use any waters which may cover the land or to use any portion of the land which is now or may formerly have been covered by water. 8. Any service, installation, connection, maintenance or construction charges for sewer, water, electricity or garbage collection or disposal, or other utilities unless disclosed as an existing tien by the public records. SCHEDULE B EXCEPTIONS APPEARING IN ALTA OWNER'S POLICY -EXTENDED COVERAGE 1. Taxes or assessments which are not now payable or which are not shown as existing liens by the records of any taxing authority that levies taxes or assessments on real property or by the public records; proceedings by a public agency which may result in taxes or assessments, or notices of such proceedings, whether or not shown by the records of such agency or by the public records. 2. Underground easements, servitudes or installations which are not disclosed by the public records. 3. (a) Unpatented mining claims; (b) reservations or exceptions in patents or in Acts authorizing the issuance thereof; (c) Indian treaty or aboriginal rights, including, but not limited to, easements or equitable servitudes; or, (d) water rights, claims or title to water, whether or not the matters excepted under (a), (b), (c) or (d) are shown by the public records. 4. Right of use, control or regulation by the United States of America in the exercise of powers over navigation; any prohibition or limitation on the use, occupancy or improvement of the land resulting from the rights of the public or riparian owners to use any waters which may cover the land or to use any portion of the land which is now or may formerly have been covered by water. 5. Any service, installation, connection, maintenance or construction charges for sewer, water, electricity, or garbage collection or disposal, or other utilities unless disclosed as an eXistin7lien by' e public records. SCHEDULE B EXCEPTIONS APPEARING IN ALTA LOAN POLICY (10/17/92) and ALTA HOMEOWNER'S POLICY OF TITLE INSURANCE 110117198) No general exceptions appear in these policy forms. I f ... , i AI-Tl:R RECORDING MAIL ro SHI:YOD~h Pazookl 14044 ~E 44th PI Bellevu<: W A 98006 Statutory Warranty Deed 2 l:l/)-rG~'~.n~t~o«:;:;<)~M"'=';:I'~C"'N~':;I,=o=n='=n~d~J~";;lte:'iON2,1~",,~n~.~h~u~o,b~a=n~d~a=o"d~w~'I~C~'~od7iM~C::'~I'~C"'N"C~I~<o~o:-:.7,7"="=<I=c~'~""rtl~;; frurJ estnbll'lhed under the La'!.l Will and Te'llnment or Wallace I NcJ'l.OII, decC3'1ed Graflte.!{ .. ) A3 Invc\unents. LLC, n Wbll~\lglon Lnmlcd Lloblllty (.ompdny I Abb",,"cdLe •• 1 T..-I"or 1Il\)lI>1.fIIW11'1, ?IN""I ilJwl 4 :,TIZ. q J?rU 5E:. Add,hOTlllllegal(\) on page d. 1 A'l>e,~or''t Tax Percel Number{s) OQ230.5913102 THE GRANTOR Merle C Nel~on nrw Juju: D NeI~Oll. hlXbolld Bmi ..... de 6nd Merle L NchOIl 8' Iruc:;ILC or the EduullLon ll'll\\ c'Itabll'l.ht:o under the La .. , WIll aud Te'llamC'l1\ OfW .. naLC I Nehnn dc-cc.1'1ed for and In comlderatJon ofTEN DOLLARS AND OTHER GOOD AND VALUABLE CONSIDERA J ION In hand p:ud. conv~ and warrants to A3 hIVeShnelll~. LtC. a Wil~'"l1glon Lmllioo Lt<lblhty CompJny the followmg de~nbed real e~18te. "Itualed In the Count)' of(Kmg), Stale of Wash mgt on I L.£ol lIt"SCBntlOJJ 1lIlO\hg! h~l£lO ond tncQn)()!JI.!illbl!I\.lIlIllJt.!C,~[I~u!ut:~ GRANTOR ACKNOWLEDGES THAl TITLE TO THE PROPERTY IS MARKFTABLE ArTHE liME OF 11-1\<, CONVEYANCE THE FOLLOWING SHALL NOT CAUSE THE lllLE TO BE UNMARKE rA~I.C RIOHl'S RFSERVATIONS. COVENANTS. CONDITIONS. AND RESTRICTIONS. PRESENTLY OF RECORD AND GLN[RAL TO THE AREA, EA~EMENTS AND ENCROACHMENTS, NOl MATERIALLY AFFCCTING rilE VAl UI or OR UNDULY IN rERFERING Wlm GRANTEE'S REASONABI [ lI'iE OF rHE PROPERTY, AND RESERVf-O 0[1.. AND/OR MINING RIGHTS ~tJ1!A.u'M ~ ,r:.Jl Document Datc 2/2012004 fi:CJr. Its -doDO \ b\ I \ '(;;nfl •. /. t: I2d<VJm.7 J~ "y-~~ JU(j1.) NelSOll StATEOF tln...f77y.,'-.. Coontyor f'VJkf2-J:U;,PA-SS I cerhry thai I know or havc ~atl~factory eVidence that Melle C NeI'OOll and Juhe Ncl-.ou. huwall.rJ .mJ Wife aOll Merlc C. Nclo;ol1. a, lru~tee of the Education 1 ruM ~Iobll,hcd under the l..o!ol Will anJ.1e.~tamcllt orWIII1t1CC I- I ~~®~~iiii~If<ii~.;~ Mud pen.on($) acknowledged that heloJleliliey .~ and voluntary acl for Ule U~ ,nd purpoje~ Notary Public m and for the Slate orWASHINGTON Residing al My appointment explrc\> E2021578 03/01/2004 12.04 / KING CoUNTY2'7~~ 00 TAX S, 0 SALE $155,000.0 PAGE001 OF' 001 20040301001101.001 20040301001101.002 . ' Order No RJ -20016171 EXHIBIT "A" THAT PORTION OF THE NORTHWEST '4 OF THE NORTHWEST 1/4 OF THE SOUTHWEST If.< OF THE NORTHWEST If.< OF SECTION 9, TOWNSHIP 23 NORTH, RANGE 5 EAST, W M , DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS BEGINNING AT THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OFTHE EAST 'h OF SAID SUBDIVISION, THENCE NORTH ALONG THE WEST LINE OF SAID EAST 'h 315 35 FEET TO TH E TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING OF THE TRACT; THENCE WEST ALONG A LINE PARALLEL WITH THE SOUTH LINE OF SAID SUBDIVISION TO AN INTERSECTION WITH A LINE PARALLEL WITH AND 30 FEET EAST OF THE WEST LINE OF SAID SECTION 9; THENCE SOUTH ALONG SAID PARALLEL LINE 105 FEET, THENCE EAST ALONG A LINE PARALLEL WITH THE SOUTH LINE OF SAID SUBDIVISION TO THE WEST LINE OF THE EAST '/, OF SAID SUBDIVISION, THENCE NORTH ALONG SAID WEST LINE 105 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING, SITUA.-E IN THE CITY OF RENTON, COUNTY OF KING, STATE OF WASHINGTON DEVELOPMENT PLANNING CITY OF RENTON . JUN 1 0 2004 RECEIVED Technical Information Report . A3 Apartments 972 Edmonds Ave. N.E. Renton Washington 98056 Prepared for: A3 Investment LLC 6100 South center Blvd #250 Thkwila Wa 98188 L: .... ) 1.0 TABLE OF CONTENTS PROJECT OVERVIEW Figure 1 -Technical Infonnation Report Worksheet Figure 2 -Site Location Figure 3 -Existing Conditions Exhibit Figure 4 -Developed Conditions Exhibit 2.0 CONDITIONS AND REQUIREMENTS SUMMARY 3.0 OFF-SITE ANALYSIS 4.0 FLOW CONTROL AND WATER QUALITY FACILITY ANALYSIS AND DESIGN A. Existing Site Hydrology B. Developed Site Hydrology C. Performance Standards D. Flow Control System E. Water Quality System 5.0 CONVEYANCE SYSTEM ANALYSIS AND DESIGN 6.0 SPECIAL REPORTS AND STUDIES 7.0 OTHER PERMITS 8.0 ESC ANALYSIS AND DESIGN • J OPERA nONS AND MAINTENANCE MANUAL 1.0 PROJECT OVERVIEW 1.0 Project Overview The subject site is located along the east side of Edmonds Ave. NE in the city of Renton, Washington and is approximately 0.32 acres in size. The property address is 972 Edmonds Ave. NE Renton, Washington 98056. (Please refer to figure I vicinity map) Currently the site is vacant and contains one singal family resident "along with an oversize 1 car garage, both of which are not in usuable condition. The site is generally flat and slops gently NE to SW. The existing ground cover is currently covered with grass and compacted gravel drive. The proposal for this project is to construct 6 unit apartment complex with associated parking, drive, and utilities improvements. The existing structures are proposed to be demolished and removed from the site. • 1,'- '" ,) King County D. rtment of Development and Environn" _.tal Services TECHNICAL INFORMATION REPORT (TIR) WORKSHEET Address GL()O -So ",-III C ,,,,7,.., alVa. Phone ______ ~ ___ 2_5_0 __ To_"' __ K_w __ .·,_I_Q __ W __ ~ __ _ Project Engineer AI.' 6aet r p. 6': Company" ~."" '., 0 "Cc," -" " . o. "0"" "." " '--:~ Address/Phone"_:~20,6"o:Z 11'::: 8787 Subdivision vShort Subdivision Grading vCommercial Other Community Drainage Basin Stream ______________________ _ Critical Stream Reach Depressions/Swales Lake ________________________ ___ Steep Slopes Project Name fl3 BPa"rme/l7S Location Township 2 3 AI Range 5 G" Section if DFW HPA Shoreline Management COE 404 Rockery DOE Dam Safety Structural Vaults FEMA Floodplain Other COE Wetlands i tie r" Wetlands ______________________ _ Seeps/Springs High Groundwater Table Groundwater Recharge Other AF.538 , , , .. .. ; Soil Type Illoluv./oo d Trpe Ie' Slopes Additional Sheets Attached REFERENCE o a LA) (I 6" "feu II'? .I f)e 1M f,iJa Additional Sheets Attached MINIMUM ESC REQUIREMENTS DURING CONSTRUCTION /sedimentation Facilities ......-stabilized construction Entrance "....perimeter Runoff control . Clearing and Grading Restrictions Cover Practices Construction Sequence Other Grass lined Channel VTank ,(PiPe System Vault Open Channel Energy Dissipater Dry Pond Wetland Wet Pond Stream Erosion Potential Erosive Velocities Low <Sit/Sec. LlMITA TION/SITE CONSTRAINT MINIMUM ESC REQUIREMENTS AFTER CONSTRUCTION Stabilize Exposed Surface Remove and Restore Temporary ESC Facilities vtlean and Remove all Silt and Debris V'Ensure Operation of Permanent Facilities Flag Limits of SAO and open space preservation areas Other Infiltration Method of Analysis Depression :-;R Flow Dispersal Compensation/Mitigati Waiver on of Eliminated Site Storage Regional Detention D.-rea -NQO Brief Description of System Operation 0 if U>" t, "0 n p" p,,1 We. r ret " I Co WI'';), cn-dol :<tl',,<=-1u rc /,CtY2C 7"0 Ol~c6((("'f)e. Facility Related Site limitations Reference Facility Limitation AF.538 ' . .. , .. Cast in Place Vault Retaining Wall Rockery >4' High Structural on Steep Slope Other. V Drainage Easement /Access Easement Native Growth Protection Easement Tract Other I or a civil engineer under by supervision have visited the site. Actual site conditions as observed were incorporate,nnto this worksheet and the attachments. To the b~t of my knowledge the information ?Vided here is accurate. A-k 50d ,r-() / ') 5/0 L\ Signed/Date AF.538 v • I -"·n·~ •• I I ./ ire !~j" 2.0 CONDITIONS AND REQUIREMENTS SUMMARY 2.0 Conditions and requirement summary Core requirement #1: Discharge at the natural location The project site is currently tributary to existing storm drainage system along Edmonds Ave. NE which is within the lower cedar river basin in the city of Renton. The project storm drainage discharge location is the same as existing natural location. . Core requirement #2: Off site Analysis A downstream drainage analysis is conducted for this site and determined that project will not have any significant adverse impact on downstream drainage system. Core requirement #3: Flow Control The runoff from the developed site will be collected and detained in accordance to the city of Renton standards prior to discharge from the site. Core requirement #4: Conveyance system The project conveyance system is designed to convey 25 year storm in accordance with the city of Renton standards. Core requirement #5: Temporary Erosion and Sedimentation Control A temporary erosion and sedimentation control plan has been prepared for the project to provide measures to control erosion during construction. This plan will be reviewed and approved by the city prior to construction. Page 1 of 2 4-3-050 / Critical Areas Checklist Date:~2-+,-,-J1-<-..L...>.JD"",L-,-'-J ____ _ Case No. Project Name: '??;OOl! ::re6lfC t- There are ten critical areas designated: Check project for: . J ~d Is it located in? Y. es ~ L~. Aquifer protection. D....-l:::::T There are two zones to check. Zone 1 Zone 2. ___________ _ _ ~ed Is it located in? Yes ~ _______ Check FEMA maps (along 3vg _ Flood Hazard D ~ May River, Cedar River and the Valley plus other selected areas)., __________ _ ~~d Is it located in? Yes No 3 . .J::J Geologic Hazards: D ~ Sensitive Slopes are 25% to 40% and Protected Slopes are 40% or more. Will need a Geotech report. Must be 15 feet vertical to be of concern ________ _ Checked Is it located in? Yes ~ 4~ Landslide Areas D.A::::J Low < 15% Medium15% to 40% High >40% Very High known landslide deposits, _____________ _ Checked }vEJ Is it located in? Erosion Hazards ~d Is it located in? 6;,-tJ Seismic Hazards as defined by the UBC Yes No D ;a-----Low (EL) <15% High >15% Yes No D ~'LowSl orS2 High S3 orS4 printed on February 25, 2002 112 0 "'lE ---------------------------------------------------------------- STREAMS AND FLOOD HAZARD AREAS NORTH 1/2 0 ..,lE WETLANDS NORTH 1/2 0 MILE EROSION HAZARD AREAS NORTH 1/2 0 LANDSLIDE HAZARD AREAS NORTH 112 0 MILE SEISMIC HAZARD AREAS NORTH 112 0 "'CE COAL MINE HAZARD AREAS NORTH ZONING P/BIPW TBCHNICAL SIIlVlC1!8 0lJU/tl3 F5 • 16 T23N R5E W 112 I -----1 ILlcP) ---_,Ii ~ a.i ! :>-L __ ~ Q) o 1 _______________ 1 c RM- o :::g o It?O "00 , ..... cs E5 9 T23N R5E W ;··T23N R5E DS -4 T23N R5E W 112 S ~t===-H-2'lP9 ~1--411-:-\ f) Nbo§ f "" ......... ~ . D5 -4 T23N R5E E V2 W V2 " r "\' : .. (r.::-:·~·:·l '"I! '.i ) l, _)Ta-n .. ~ ... ~~-~.a_=-.. ~-.-ifr~ :~.; N£J~I 12~iltS;;r1.(8a~t-l5g.-j4~ ...... ·-J.161'-:-. ---7~ : ' s' S',! 8'" e'';::-:iSi e' 0" .£81 ,.;" I I r::--:-,----, .... Co I .' ! .. <Xl. : . -.. NE 10th Pl., ~, .... , !> .. ... . .... ., \. 10 Ii-ro ' I ~I i ....... L' .' t:j ~ I : ,! .... 'l, -·1 : ; .. :-. i· ·1· I_ It· -.. ~ \ 134! ..' , .... J ' ;; , 320 ~ I ..." -, ..•. "' .•. 'e ........... ' 1 '. , 1 _ a, I ~ oj'. ~_~18. ' . J.. , '... ".-. ,'/0 '" , h!il ~ " St i' I a,' . f 172 : rTTn'~ '~ .. I.) ,. . Q.I , .. , , ' . ;--. .• . . ...... , ''' ...... ,_J 1 lI2J.j. ~ L& r 'L.... '. . , '.' !> , ..... :¢':= ----\. I r', 812 , ....:J ~ ',I r"[6~'" . , : 111 r ' ..... '""] . I: I . . , 1:1 ... . n 199, t-.I ~ Iii Ii. "i a; , L·D1 . ~l New. port. ; '~.".' Z .... ~ I . , -' I I .. , Ct ,NE : "'. ! ... ~ . >1. "", I .. t . ~~ , ~ , ; ~: ; • J '. _ ',' -84 I - .', VI·· .• c: 'j 4 1 & I ;. '171' "I , . ..... .' . ,,0, I . . ,. _, . ~!' ";; i '. :l1 " i " 76:..~9&."':"'.~ . ~9! \ "" u" 'ct '. t ];) jj. 00 ~ .... "" I '" '\ D1 . Z . -: ~--...... , .... w,,: IT! ; .;. i ... ,\ ~.-.Q'~ . (j' , :.l >-I \ 00 3.0 OFF -SITE ANALYSIS 3.0 Off site Analysis A. Upstream drainage consideration Based on the topographic survey map and site visit, it is determined that no upstream drainage flow is tributary to this site. B. Downstream draina'ge Consideration Existing storm drainage system along project site is consistent of a 12 inch pipe draining southerly along eastside of Edmonds Ave. NE. The storm drainage system changes to 15 in. and approximately 500 feet south of the project intersects with a 21 in. storm sewer pipe traveling easterly toward Daton Ave. NE. Please refer to the downstream drainage map for more details. Due to the small size of the project and detention requirements for the site, it is not anticipated that the development will have any adverse impact to the existing downstream pipe system, S~ SF ~ SF ----- 10B71 0CI6S !J 56.03 ,,0 ~ ,iii? <>. 6661 S 0320 56 10871 0070 58.6 ,," , ,~ <>' 7211 S em! 61 (1-/',,>'0 Go,' !bvt> .... 0c,'" . 7556 7656 9138 lIMO 10872 007!5 10872 ooeo 62 58.43 1ft,p " £~SF o:ro 56 58 7583 SF 02!0 ~.02 53.6 1~"0 rD/5? 'IC),)C;; 6788 SF roa5 56 ~ ~ '" '" '" '" ,S -L- 87 81 6 1~<:) ~ ~i'SF N ti:lO ., .-----~~~~~-- ----8-6.-.45-- 17 .{'')() "'f.,?'-tJ..":> ~ , " 79"i.7 SF ~ '" '" 8 '" '" ~ 0 '" C)'<;,.'~' 7~5 SF 9153 92,12 13 ,,0 ~"SF 93~ 8<.,5 ;1.,,0 'l,,1-:(rr' !D , <0 '" eli67 SF ~ 82 5 ~G ~" 0 SF <D I ~' ~ W Z, SF 0" &5 SF o~ 18800 SF 1lM7 ,,t: -,--:'-,--",~, -,--, ," 0'05 U" wfl r " I o r:mlillllllllil l I H iii i I t"T ... -, ~' '<:t .. ' " ,~ ! ~,"""" .. ,.~ , .1 2.1" STORM: SEWER I I. I 'm • ':IE ~ \ I \ 9 o . , '-1" ~; ,-.. <JI jI' ± \ + >\iij , 0 '~-'" 1/) --~ 21"STORI>1 sew.t:R • ",till ,!, I ill ! 11 11 : !ii ~Tm ~, u ~.' ~:J.t.»' .~~; ~r.;. ~"ir!. """'\ ,.J .. :TO'SANITARY. SEW.ER: ' .. ':' III I k,nt' n'lO" SANITARY " Se.WIH, , I , I iii i ,I if I" 'I' ,,-I i I, I ' Iii 'Ii Iii, i:l tH "~to 'f' '" i:!.W ,Ii'; +H Ii Ii! Uli'1'ii 'ILl; i 1\ I, . \ I,. I'" i-' ':1; :11: !+, ri] : i I ., . , ' il! Il\~4mH'li 'II . , Ii' t+H WII I!! t_--i :, Il11TIntn II I'I I I, .1 .Ut!!1!1]l I' t : I I i··H-;··1· j,+t~.t-tl }I 't,! .:i,\ i ' '\' \yt,+~"I+ Ii, i I Ii ""\I,i, , ,. ! i\' it 1\ \1 \ I , I'I' , i I ii , I , ' '1'1' i!i I. I! 'ITIITI ,. . , I r" , , , ITIII i,I L,I! , i 'ii :;.,~ "" :1C' '~ ~ i ~. '~; ~i~ ~' • ~. ~ ;~ ',k E:Xa'~G.: (.I, TEE. , . cd'GI!..T!,VA)Nf. To., OLD ",.':.:.::.V'I El.l';. :ST ..... "1:5. ~.4+ 9 tR ;:Plo .' .... No 0, ____ ~_ ":"~$;;"~L:}'IbT1'8:;:"M~]f!~'~.:';_ (jJ 0. ,_.$At'I,.::5eW.ER:", :: .. :: "7' ~ 'fT] • (fI y :;0' \11. rn H y:--"-~ . I / / I I o .' ,M r-n I' rn: .. , I" ~' 'rTi' c-! ,,'-;,·1 \ 'to": E ' ~ ,---~ ,! I ~ c;; 0' ~~ ~ \ ;= ~ iii .~. ~ I: "~.'J' '.' . CPi." rri I ,~ 6-1°'»; g;i!~;' J'. , I ~ I .t::j < ~ -I>! i;l 61, r'1 ' ~ 1" ~ ,n""" 1 I . ' -,,-' : ,,, '. . , ,';' ~ •. "' , ,I!" 0',,' , EX." . ' 'I '" !lJ: :~,rL\ ___ LC.:!:.~A:!ER' .!.. ) ":: .;;f$: .. 1, ({ __ 4;'Xi~ ,I , I \ .' I .,.....r L _"I . i' -: : ~/'i': · "I' m ~ I~ " " I'l> ~ ;c . I h';~ G)': I ,--Z ~ p~~ '1 ~:·8 "' _ OJ I i;1 fi; -I' , U1 .3:: + G ~ '-' IT! ",,<1 2i I :' I I /1 ~ ~~ '. I I ·.Z"GAS,MA:IN~:' .. ~ ------.-. lJ1 r* -'-..,;~ i;;:S;l'WATcRfi;\1\IN.1,' '. t. ".~ . ··1 " 10 TH PL. ·No '( Hjttti.IOo Wn ,~ 111111 ~» '. • '01 (})"'» I ~ .-I .. J:: ~ 1* 15 I' , I» "~ ,< 10"W ,,,,,." 10' ALLEY ---.. ----- ni >< +. . 6', '~. fT\ '~ !l>. Q ", ~rES!W*-2.1 'w (;1: fTI ['T1 o rn -t » r ;;\ ..,., t ·· .. IO!H '.~ .. AVE" NQ ~- -± ~------------------------oJ EX,2,"STL ,W~T.ER .MAIN 0 ": f'" 10 W Ir~ '~f~ .. EX_ 3:'.C;;ATE V6L..VE .. ,:.STA 4-e~ 01.S' IS'W 10 TH PLo i. t c--;....1----.------- ---::--";£1\' ::.2 'c .. ~n." WAfER .\Y1A'ltL, (]I rTJ ,rTJ o ~~'w (, .... ..... --' ... N. l>. N o R:,>ro:.,"> 0,,' 0,,, C) .... (\J c) ... 0) ...... 7~5 SF 250 u" .. , ""r' 125 c)"> W~I 1~~ 31iB SF o· &5 SF , 7656 SF ~6 5 =S953 r '" "' "' 0"'~5 SF "' "' ~ 9I:l9 ~ 0'lib:! I 10 61.25 61. 5 _·~o ~ 140--- O.,S*" 1.0 ,JO@ ol\. 62.16 0 N 89-3J-15 W '" , 0 Ii ollil~'.o.,~lbl.~,'T.~r",1~"~0~:~5l".~E~iiJ:~9~'~2;B~"~~~==~~I:BB:=:'::'==:='~~ UJ " 0'" ° 66 ~ ",",' • X 4 .," '" SF t; 9900 SF' 36fJ." e ~'ti sec; 4,,~f g ".,0 0 • ill WT7 . ~ IU9UO Sf><' '" .' 0 0 b vuu 0021 I Qo,C) o· 79 • 18800 SF ~ ;'lIZ ., .,6.94 36.9 1099 0.40 68 ~7 ~ __ . 98 . .40 040 SF 188 3' _~5~37,-, 92 OOZO' a: o . _ ... ,~ ..... ¥~._. '-_. tTl 63 36 11 ~~ i" .. .c.·\~?"I" --( 0" jI 1*"; .o,...~~ 0" ~' "'~Aq . <0> . . o·~" -----s • AG· r---~~4I''''''''''' @, "'t-'" j,----l1J IS"!' .... ~ , 0"·1 "I ~f ,,;;,i: ~f 4~ ml >ift"i," 01 "oP ~ ~ 18 " /~. ~ 1° _ Q _ 0)0-'/ 0, <D Xi" ,,0, 'fit ~; " ::; ::; ;:::'''; "Q' X ____________ ?-]]"p:.o _ ~ 0 ~~-------, /;,1 0'" I, ~ J <i ~~ d'l~ '" '"I ~'" ",I , •• ,;.1' IJ'" ,.1-•. , >--1M N' # I •• ~ , ~<-. 'A< '1/£,.I.~. ' .• ~I 1 =1 SFI !0872 S110872 SFI!0873 SFn 51..,.,. J 1 I~ 007lI OQS) 0CII!5 Z 40105 SF 1 !l 0090 -'\,0) ~'I·I~ '~ I ,.@ ll/ u \Z/ 7J \!:::p ~.o, Ba ." 4Z.1S" , ""V«JU/~~· N. E ,; 9 T H. ~ t=' L.<fH¥.I78 \I~ SS-f: 57 60 57 ~ 13,0 d 1i ,,0,,: '\~ ~. '\~ .... ~ '\"/; ~-' ,~ ?J ~ 14,<'17 S 50lls SF 53&4 SF 5<195 SF ~ OWJ 010 cn50 0'Il5 _55 57 60 57 5! 5S 62 58 ",0 ",0 ",'" ,,'" 1) '" ~ "' , , 'i1:.l1'f.o ~ ,,'l-0 0: '\~:'f.o ~ ,,~ ° ~ ° "' ° '" '" N 7996 s~ 64\1 sF ~SF'" 7583 SF 0275 Q285 02!10 51.0? 5".03 62.03 58 02 7) U 56.0 58.6 58.43 53.6 0° 0" ,e~Cl "0 ,~ ,-1~"" ~" rt/.h \". u' nSF 'I(),)O 6661 ~ 7211 5 o:ro 67ge SF 032l OM 0J05 ~6 61 S6 56 ~IS~87 -, J 25r-81.6 1~o '!!' -A"11P SF oj ~'" -----8-6.-;5--- 17 .,,,,,, "-" "' .... '?-o'tj ...., 79'a7 SF oil '" 90.95 _ --------ij to\;) ,.... '" 't-'?,,~") U? '" '''' ~ '}873 S"" ~ 8 ;;; 24,\",1:) .~SF;;; . .:16.2 ,," ~ 11~o SF ~ 'i~ 91.43 1%,:0 '" ~ ~'" '\ SF r-.. 90.92 ':r 92.12 13 ,,0 ft."(/) . ;: : SF ;::. 93.65 '" <D 14,,0 "' '" ~ S-Fui "' , "' 9'.7 [€ 82.55 fg A"O Igj '1,'?:"f' III '''' '" 9067 SF 0IIl!0 82 5 0 3;0" <D a&,'" 0 ~ SF to - ~' ~ w' %, 251 25 62.35 1 5-'----r 95~.p 3'~~ s~; ",0 ~ ~'iis10 " 0225 29 ,6jlI 15 SF I '\~l(/l2O rn Cl ; \?z <:> ~~ 28~ '" 20~ sr-~ ~O S~ to ,,"'l-'\ U1 1'1 cg4.95 21 ,<0" I 27 ,," I~ ,\~7 s~ ~ ,,'to SF~, '" <D 22,"'" r 28 ~ '\~6 SF~ !.O ~ SF ~ 94.95 95 61.95-' 61 f 61 ,," g ~C)O 5d"'l SF 0190 62.2 2£0 ~vh . 5~~SFro 01B5 61 <:> o~ _ ,Vry'? "', 5987 SF 0200 67 J 30 r -84.[2 0", M'" 0", M'" 1Ei' 85.04 , o '" • f.o() ,..., ,,-' <D '\'O'\dt ui :ilI31 SF'" a7CO 84.05 29 ,,'" t8 ~SF ~ '" '" <-? '\~~~ U.6 CJ705 ~~. '" SF'" to 3 "f.o() Ln ,/J;.50 SF:&; 67I:l f-(J) ·1 W' -! I ;: .,; ~, ~I N M. cOl~ "". ",'" ~'" (O~ OJ OJ -I l~ ~ G ;.. 60 " ~.1 t. 0"$ ~ 7. , O"ltI .~ II-I' 9 " D12L '0 ,~..., D~OO ..... .IJ.-s.... "",5 M-. ';,w: f,A-SS Q •• 6, 0 ~1 ..... '0" .,~ ,)" .. ' CD ". 0-. ""' I CD o.1fi:l tJ~H . ,~L<.I • "~I~ 0 2 ,g: ..... • IL .. . Oil f-en W B , ~ 7." • I ''''f;L:''~_ csl4 ".,. -i -H<-l> '<T~ (;,1 $ J'" f"-.. 14"3 ~ -'w I Z. ... ", s. 4 . -:-: CJ{;j ... a: , !' 01° #c, 0/%;: t., U " . !! ,us o~ 6 "gi"1" ,~. . ~. 0"'" ,,*" '4~'M.4Z. S& s. "t; ~. ~·H ,oJ' .. ~., 77.~ I 'l:il ,., Q .. . ~' '510 (LE. I? as'S ~[ • IS osfO t {IS. 14 1'5 ..... ~~~f.' 0".0 "JJ 24 " v! _ ~ ~ ~,~ ~ ," ., 0605 ~ , ., • o .-' , cltJuI '1'>1:)8 'til .M.. a~)! N£'l~ 91 • sa 'til .M. as)! ~£'l~ t . sa to/ron SllOIA lIllS 1VOlNH:)U A\dlQ/ d tu3lSAS tu.lOlS t , , , , , , , , , , , J , • , , , • , , , , .. , , , f .. .. .. .. ~ • .. .. , , , .. , , t t t t t • » t t » » » » t • t • • a • • • • .. ~ Z ~ E-4 IE,c,.., 121'5·' .. 1&.n-:--\ ~ (' --) It Il}, . ~ " ,;,. '\ v o -'II If " .: :::=: \: ;!i I-: ,I ~ I "" -~ -'~ ..... _) ( .',--.. ,'" "I r"-"I '::'::,1 ! I II I I II I ~, .. ~ I , J I' , I ,II, 1'1) " " , ~I , Storm System ~ PIBIPW TECHNICAL SERVlCES 11113/02. • 5 T23N R5E E 112 F4 • 17 T23N R5E E 112 8ea$"" PlAp Topography lines are in Y2 meter intervals , ' ' I -" ? 200 .. yo 1:"600 E4 8 T23N R5E E 1/2 , \0 ~ t-.I (".) Z ~ ~ i! 5308 AkF '. \ PWWNE I~I' ····~·.· ... II· .. ')· .).:\.\\.\£'k,n .. . .. ~~~r-::-, -tfk\.'tl--_-:-'-y-:- --o--__ o_~_ ---:---':~--------:.: ~l-~~:: .-_-_.: ~. ___ 0--_. I _,;.~=~ 7"" Il .r'-. • I I .:....::...:...-.~--.:-- I . . ~~""~<{~~«~~; -- I \.' I· , ,;' '\' I .. /' L '- " " , :. : .. : • "".' \. ' • .lI "..\I ---, -+""""---+"";"'--"""--11-, .. --, SHEET NO. 12 KING COUNTY AREA, WASHINGTON (MAPLE VALLEY QUADRANGLE) :~ .. .,.,,:,~_j 1710000 FEET I 122;°2;°301 ". " I:> 11 14 . AkF ---~80000 FEET ,. \} ~ \I) '" • ~ ~ 1 I I . U. S, DEPARTMENT OF Ar SOIL CONSERVATION SER. f/Gc .~,.,.---~--. i • 'ILTURE SOIL LEGEND The f"~51 cophal leiter is Ih .. '.lilial on .. of the soli nome. A second capitol leller, A, B, C, D, E, or F, indicolu tho. doss of slope. Symbols without <I slope leller ore those of neorly-Iev'!d soils. SYMBOL NAME AgB AgC AgO AkF Atderwood grovelly sandy loam, 0 to 6 percent slop .. " Alder ..... ood gravelly ',.,ondy 100m, 6 to 15 percent slopes Alderwood gravelly sandy loam, 151030 percent slopes Alderwooo and Kllsop 50;]5, very sleep AmB AmC Ao B.C B.O ""B~~"~~ B, Bu Cb Arenls, Alderwood mole.jol,a to 6 ~rcent slopes. A.ents, AldeiWooc:! molerjgl, 610 15 percenT 510,,",5. ArenTs, EVer"!! maleria'-. Beaus"I" grovelly sondy loom, 610 15 percent slopes B"ousile gro;"elly sandy 100m, 151030 percent slopes· •. _~:'"":'~ ,". ,,:jI . ',l.:-:. ',,~ .?fp,.p~-u!:.,.-.!' Bellingham sill loom .Briscol sill IOQm Buc::kl~y silt I<>:om Cooslol Beoch~s Eo Earlmon! silt loom Ed Edgewlck fin" sandy loam EvB Everell g.ovelly sandy loam, 010 5 pe.c~nl slopes EvC Evere" grav~lly sandy loom,S 10 15 p~.cen! slopes evo Everell gravelly sandy loom, 1510 30 percenl slopes Ewe Everell_Alderwood g.avelly sandy looms, 61015 pe.cenl slopes rnA Indianola loomy fine sand, 0 to 4 percent slopes InC Indianola loomy fine sand, 4 10 15 percenl slopes InD Indianola loomy fine sand, 15.10 30 p!!reenl slopes KpB Kitsap sill loam, 2108 p<!'rcenl slopes KpC Kilsap sill loom,S to 15 percenl sloves KpO Kitsop silt IOQm, 151030 percenl slopes KsC KIous gravelly loomy sand, 610 15 perc~nl slap~s Ma Mixed alluvial land NeC N"'iltan very grav",lly loomy sand, 21015 perc",,,1 slop"'s Ng N .. wber9 silt loom Nk NookSaCK silt loom No Norma sondy loom Or Orcos peal Ds Oridia silt loom. OVC Oval! gravelly IOQm, 010 15 percenl slopes OvD Dvoll gravelly loom, 1510 2S'pftrcent slopes OvF Ovall gravelly loom, 40to 75 percenl slopes Pc Pilchuck loomy fine sand Pk PilchlKk fine sandy loam Pu Pugel silTy C loy loom Py Puyallup fine sondy loam RoC Ragnor fine sondy loom, 6 10 15 percenl slopes RoD Rogno, fine sondy loom, 15 to 25 percent slopes RdC Rognor-Ind ionolo ossac iation, sloping • RdE Rognor.lndionolo associaTion, moderately sleep· Re Renton sill loom Rh R iverwos h So Sh Sk S. So Salol slh loom Sammamish sil' loom Sean Ie muc k Shako. mvck Si sill loom So Snohomish silt loom Sr Snohomish silt loom, thick surface variant Su Svlton sill loom Tu Tvkwil~ muck Ur Urban land Wo Woodinville sill loom • The composition of Ihese units is more variable Ihon Ihe: of the others. in th" area, bv1 it ho~ been controlled well enough to interprel for Ihe e"peeted u$e af the soils. , --) 4.0 FLOW CONTROL AND WATER QUALITY FACILITY ANALYSIS AND DESIGN / 4.0: Flow Control and Water Quality Facility Anaylisis and Design A. Existing site hydrology Total site area=13730 s£=0.32 ac. Existing impervious area (roof)=1230 s£=0.03 ac. Existing gravel drive area=1380 sf=0.04 ac. Existing grass area=1 0700=0.25 ac. B. Developed site hydrology Total site area=0.32 AC Proposed impervious area=8340 sf=O.l9 ac Proposed pervious area/landscaping=5390 sf=.13 ac. c. Performance standards CN=98 CN=94 CN=86 CN=98 CN=86 The site requires flow control such that the developed peak runoff rate of discharge does not exceed the redeveloped peak runoff rates for 2 year and 10 year storm event. D. Flow control system The site will utilize storm drainage detention pipe to meet the performance standards. Please refer to storm drainage calculation and plan for details. E. Water Quality system A basic wet tank is proposed for water quality measures to be provided as a dead storage under the detention volume within the detention pipe. 5/26/04 12:S6:48 an Shareware Relea A3 investmcnt Detention sizing calculation page 1 ===================================================================== BASIN 10: Al SBUH METHODOLOGY TOTAL AREA ....... : RAINFALL TyPE .... : PRECIPITATION .... : TIME INTERVAL .... : BASIN SUMMARY NAME: 2yr-pre-dev. 0.32 Acres TYPE1A 2.00 inch.es 10.00 min BASEFLOWS: AREA .. : CN .... : TC .... : 0.00 cfs PERV 0.2S Acres 86.00 26.62 min ABSTRACTION COEFF: 0.20 TcReach -Sheet L: 130.00 PEAK RATE: O.OS cfs VOL: ns:0.1S00 p2yr: 2.00 s:O.OOSO 0.03 Ac-ft TIME: 490 min BASIN 10: A2 SBUH METHODOLOGY TOTAL AREA ....... : RAINFALL TYPE .... : PRECIPITATION .... : TIME INTERVAL .... : NAME: 10yr-pre-dev. 0.32 Acres TYPE1A 2.90 inches 10.00 min, BASEFLOWS: AREA .. : CN .... : TC .... : ABSTRACTION COEFF: 0.20 0.00 cfs PERV 0.2S Acres 86.00 26.62 min TcReach -Sheet L: 130.00 ns:0.1S00 p2yr: 2.00 s:O.OOSO PEAK RATE: 0.09cfs VOL: 0.05 Ac-ft TIME: 480 min BASIN 10: A3 SBUH METHODOLOGY TOTAL AREA ....... : RAINFALL TYPE .... : PRECIPITATION .... : TIME INTERVAL .... : NAME: 100yr-pre-dev. 0.32 Acres TYPE1A 3.90 inches 10.00 min BASEFLOWS: AREA .. : CN .... : TC .... : 0.00 cfs PERV 0.2S Acres 86.00 26.62 min ABSTRACTION COEFF: 0.20 TcReach -Sheet L: 130.00 PEAK RATE: O.lS cfs VOL: ns:0.1S00 p2yr: 2.00 s:O.OOSO 0.07 Ac-ft TIME: 480 min BASIN 10: A4 SBUH METHODOLOGY TOTAL AREA ....... : RAINFALL TYPE .... : PRECIPITATION .... : TIME INTERVAL .... : NAME: 2yr-post-dev. 0.32 Acres TYPE1A 2.00 inches 10.00 min BASEFLOWS: AREA .. : CN .... : TC .... : 0.00 cfs PERV 0.13 Acres 86.00 6.30 min ABSTRACTION COEFF: 0.20 TcReach -Sheet L: 130.00 PEAK RATE: 0.10 cfs VOL: ns:0.1S00 p2yr: 2.00 s:O.OOSO 0.04 Ac-ft TIME: 480 min IMP 0.07 Acres 9S.70 26.62 min IMP 0.07 Acres 9S.70 26.62 min IMP 0.07 Acres 95.70 26.62 min IMP 0.19 Acres 98.00 6.30 min 5/26/04 12:56:48 am Shareware Release A3 investment . Detention sizing calculation BASIN ID: A5 SBUH METHODOLOGY TOTAL AREA ....... : RAINFALL TyPE .... : PRECIPITATION .... : TIME INTERVAL .... : BASIN SUMMARY NAME: 10yr-post-dev. 0.32 Acres TYPE1A 2.90 inches 10.00 min BASEFLOWS: AREA .. : CN .... : TC .... : ABSTRACTION COEFF: 0.20 0.00 cfs PERV 0.13 Acres 86.00 6.30 min TcReach -Sheet L: 130.00 ns:0.1500 p2yr: 2.00 s:0.0050 PEAK RATE: 0.16 cfs VOL: 0.06 Ac-ft TIME: 480 min BASIN ID: A6 SBUH METHODOLOGY NAME: 100yr-post-dev. TOTAL AREA ....... : RAINFALL TYPE .... : PRECIPITATION .... : TIME INTERVAL .... : 0.32 Acres TYPE1A 3.90 inches 10.00 min ABSTRACTION COEFF: 0.20 BASEFLOWS: AREA .. : CN .... : TC .... : 0.00 cfs PERV 0.13 Acres 86.00 6.30 min TcReach -Sheet L: 130.00 ns:0.1500 p2yr: 2.00 s:0.0050 PEAK RATE: 0.23 cfs VOL: 0.08 Ac-ft TIME: 480 min BASIN ID: A7 SBUH METHODOLOGY NAME: water quality volume. TOTAL AREA ....... : 0.32 Acres BASEFLOWS: 0.00 cfs RAINFALL TyPE .... : TYPEIA PERV PRECIPITATION .... : 0.67 inches AREA .. : 0.13 Acres TIME INTERVAL .... : 10.00 min CN .... : 86.00 TC .... : 6.30 min ABSTRACTION COEFF: 0.20 TcReach -Sheet L: 130.00 ns:0.1500 p2yr: 2.00 s:0.0050 PEAK RATE: 0.02 cfs VOL: 0.01 Ac-ft TIME: 480 min page 2 IMP 0.19 Acres 98.00 6.30 min IMP 0.19 Acres' 98.00 6.30 min IMP 0.19 Acres 98.00 6.30 min 5/26/04 12:56:49 am Shareware Release A3 investment Detention sizing calculation HYDROGRAPH SUMMARY PEAK TIME VOLUME HYD RUNOFF OF OF. Contrib NUM RATE PEAK HYDRO Area cfs min. cf\AcFt Acres ============================================= 1 0.050 510 1624 cf 0.32 2 0.094 510 2586 cf 0.32 3 0.043 530 1624 cf 0.32 4 0.072 520 2585 cf 0.32 5 0.091 540 3687 cf 0.32 page 3 5/26/04 12:56:55 am Shareware Release A3 investment Detention sizing calculation STORAGE STRUCTURE LIST UNDERGROUND PIPE ID No. 1 Description: Detention pipe Diameter: 4.00 ft. Length: Slope ... : 0.0000 ft/ft upstr: 22.00 ft. dnstr: page 4 5/26/04 12:56:56 am Shareware Releab~ A3 investment Detention sizing calculation STAGE STORAGE TABLE UNDERGROUND PIPE ID No. 1 Description: Detention pipe Diameter: 4.00 ft. Length: Slope ... : 0.0000 ft/ft upst.r: STAGE <----STORAGE----> STAGE <----$TORAGE----> STAGE (ft) ---cf-----Ac-Ft-(ft) ---ct-----he-Ft-(ft) 22.00 ft. dnstr: <----STORAGE----> ---ct-----Ac-Ft- STAGE (ft) page <----STORAGE----> ---cf-----Ac-Ft- ~~~====~m_ •••• =~=~==m_=========a~.~~~===~ __ ~=====zm~._a_====mza ___ ~2==a_._. ___ ==~z_ ••• _======_ •• _._~===z 10.00 O. 0000 0.0000 11 .10 61.791 0.0014 12.20 155. BO O. 0036 13.30 243.91 0.0056 10.10 .8412 O. 0000 11.20 69.755 0.0016 12.30 164 .53 0 0038 13 .• 0 250.46 0.0057 10.20 5.1679 0 . 0001 11.30 77 '12 0.0018 12.40 173. " 0 0040 13 .50 256.51 0.0059 10. )0 9.4200 0.0002 11.40 86 233 O. 0020 12.50 IBI .77 0.0042 13 .60 262.07 0.0060 10 40 14.388 0 .0003 11.50 94 . 693 O . 0022 12 .60 190. 23 0 0044 13 .70 267.04 0.001)1 10. 50 19. 946 0.0005 11.60 103.27 O. 0024 12 .70 198.55 0 0046 13 . BO 271.29 0.0062 10.60 26 00. 0 .0006 11 .70 111. 93 0.0026 12 . 80 206 . 70 0 0047 13 . '0 274.62 O . 0063 10 70 32 .494 0.0007 11 .BO 120 66 0.0028 12 . '0 214 .67 0 0049 14 .00 276.46 0.0063 10 BO 39. 362 0.0009 11 .90 129 43 0 0030 13 . 00 222. ., 0 0051 10.90 46 . 560 0.0011 12 .00 138.23 0 .0032 13.10 229.90 0.0053 11.00 54 .048 0.0012 12 .10 147.03 0 .0034 13 .20 237.10 0.0054 5 5/26/04 12:56:58 an, Shareware Relea~," A3 investment Detention sizing calculation DISCHARGE STRUCTURE LIST MULTIPLE ORIFICE ID No. I. Description: control structure Outlet Elev: 10.00 Elev: 8.00 ft Orifice Diameter: Elev: 12.20 ft Orifice 2 Diameter: 1.1250 in. 0.9434 in. page 6 5/26/04 12:57:0 am Detention sizing calculation Shareware Release A3 investment page 7 ===================================================================== STAGE DISCHARGE TABLE MULTIPLE ORIFICE ID No. Description: control structure Outlet Elev: Elev: B.OO Elev: 12.20 10.00 ft Orifice Orifice 7. ft 1 Diameter: Diameter: 1.1250 0.9434 STAGE <--DISCHARGE---> STAGE <--DISCHARGE---> STAGE <--DISCHARGE---> (ft) ---efs---------(ft) ---cfs---------(ftl ---cfs--------- 10.00 0.0000 11 . 60 0.0434 13 .20 O . 0856 10. 10 0.0109 11 .70 0.0448 13 . 30 0.0877 10 20 O. 0154 11 .80 0.0461 13 .40 0.0898 10.30 0.0188 11. 90 0.0473 13 . 50 O. 0918 10 40 0.0217 12 . 00 0.0486 13 .60 O . 0937 10. 50 0.0243 12 . 10 0498 13 .70 O . 0956 10.60 0 0266 12 .20 0 0509 13 .80 0 .0975 10.70 0.0287 12. 30 O. 0597 13 .90 0.0993 10.80 0 0307 12.40 0.0640 14 .00 0.1011 10. 90 0.0326 12 .50 0.0675 14 . 10 O. 1028 11. 00 0.0343 12 .60 0.0707 14 .20 0.1045 11. 10 0.0360 12 .70 0.0735 14 .30 0.1062 11.20 0.0376 12 . 80 0 0762 14 .40 O . 1079 11 .30 0.0)92 12. 90 O. 0787 14 .50 0.1095 11 .40 0 0406 13 . 00 0.0811 14 .60 O . 1111 11 . 50 O . 0421 13. 10 O. 0834 14 .70 0.1126 in. in. STAGE <--DISCHARGE---> (it) ---efs--------- 14 . 80 O . 1142 14 .90 0.1157 15.00 0 .1172 15. 10 0.1187 15 20 0.1201 15 30 0.1216 15.40 0 .1230 15 50 0.1244 15 . 60 0.1258 15 . 70 0.1272 15.80 0.1285 15 90 0.1299 16 00 0.1312 5/26/04 12:57:3 am Shareware Release A3 investment Detention sizing calculation LEVEL POOL TABLE SUMMARY MATCH INFLOW -STO--DIS-<-PEAK-> <--------DESCRIPTION---------> (cfs) (efs) --id---id-<-STAGE> id 2yr/24hr loyr/24hr 0.05 0.09 0.10 0.16 1 12.10 13.61 2 OUTFLOW STORAGE (ds) VOL (cf) 0.05 147.26 cf 0.09 262.57 cf page 8 ') KING COUNTY, WASI-'NGTON, SURFACE WATF DESIGN MANUAL (2) CN values can be area weighted when they apply to pervious areas of similar CN's(within 20 CN points). However, high CN areas should not be combined with low CN areas (unless the low CN areas are less than 15% of the subbasin). In this case, separate hydrographs should be generated and summed to form one hydrograph. FIGURE 3.S.2A HYDROLOGIC SOIL GROUP OF THE SOILS IN KING COUNTY HYDROLOGIC • HYDROLOGIC SOIL GROUP GROUp· SOIL GROUP GROUp· AldelWood C Orcas Peat D Arents, Alderwood Material C Oridia D Arents. Everett Material B Ovall C Beau'site C Pilchuck C Bellingham D Puget D Briscot D Puyallup B Buckley D Ragnar B Coastal Beaches Variable Renton D Ear1mont Silt Loam D Riverwash Variable Edgewick C Salal C Everett AlB 'Sammamish D Indianola A Seanle D Kilsap C . Shaear D Klaus C SiSili C Mixed Alluvial Land Variable Snohomish D Neilton A Sultan C Newberg .• .. :S·'. Tukwila D Nooksack C Urban Variable Normal Sandy Loam D Wocxfinvme ..,Q. ~--.-.--.. -- HYDROLOGIC SOIL GROUP CLASSIFICATIONS A. (Low runoff potential). Soils having high infiltration rates. even when thoroughly wetted, and consisting chiefly of deep, well-to-excessively drained sands or gravels. These soils have a high rale of water transmiss;on. B. (riooerately low runoff potential). Soils having moderate infiltration rates when thoroughly wetted, and consisting chiefly of moderately fine to mooerately coarse textures. These soils have a moderate rate of waler transmission. I C. (Mooerately high runoff potentiai). Soils having slow Infiltration rates when thoroughly wetted. and 1 consisting chieffy of soils with a layer that impedes downward movement of water, or soils y.,ith mooeralely , f::~g~O r~::~e:~:::ial~h:~I::V~9v:::::w ~:~il:~:~e:a:~:::~:i~h:rOUghIY wened and consisting ,I chiefly of clay soils with a high swelling potential. soils with a permanent high water table. soils with a hardpan or clay layer at or near the surface. and shallow soils over nearly impervious material. These soils I have a very slow rate of water transmission. i From SCS, TR·55, Second Ed~ion, June t986, Exhib~ A·l. Revisions made from SCS, So, Interpretation Record, Form #5, Seplember t988. 3.5.2·2 11/92 KIN G C OU N T Y, WAS H' "J GT 0 N, SUR F ACE W ATE II I) E S I G" MAN U A L TABLE 3.5.28 SCS WESTERN WASHINGTON RUNOFF CURVE NUMBERS SCS WESTERN WASHINGTON RUNOFF CURVE NUMBERS (Published by SCS in 1982) . Runon curve numbers for selected agriculturat, suburban and urban land. use lor Type lA rainfall distribution. 24·hour storm duration. CURVE NUMBERS BY HYDROLOGIC SOil GROUP LAND USE DESCRIPTION A B C D Cultivated land(I): winter condition B6 91 94 95 Mountain open areas: low growing brush and grasslands 74 82 89 92 ~ ~'\ Meadow or pasture: 65 78 '65'; 89 Wood or forest tand: undisturbed or older second growth 42 64 76 81 Wood or forest land: young second growth or brush 55 .. 72 81 86 Orchard; with cover crop 81 88 92 94 Open spaces, lawns. parks, golf courses, cemeteries, landscaping. good condition: grass cover on 75% or more of the area 68 80 86 90 fair condition: grass cover on 50% to 75% of the area 77 as 9) 92 Gravel roads and parking lots 76 as 89 91 Dirt roads and parking lots 72 62 87 89 Impervious surfaces,-pavement, roofs, etc. 98 98 98 98 Open water bodies: lakes. wetlands, ponds, etc. 100 100 100 100 Single Family Residential (2) Dwelling Unit/Gross Acre % Impervious (3) 1.0 DU/GA 15 Separate curve number 1.5 DU/GA 20 shall be selected 2.0 DU/GA 25 for pervious and 2.5 DU/GA 30 impervious porlion 3.0 OU/GA 34 of the si:e or basin 3.5 DU/GA 38 4.0 DU/GA 42 4.5 DU/GA 46 5.0 OUfGA 48 5.5 OU/GA 50 6.0 OU/GA 52 6.5 OU/GA 54 7.0 OU/GA 56 Planned unit developments, % impervious condomin'lums, apartments. must be computed commercial business and industrial areas. -(1) For a more detailed deSCription of agnculturalland use curve numbers refer to National En;,~eenng Handbook, Section 4, Hydrology, Chapter 9, August 1972. (2) Assumes roof and ddveway runoff is directed into street/storm system. (3) The remaining pervious areas (lawn) are considered to be in gooo condition for these curve ~umbers, 3.5.2-3 i 1119: ;~ r i I KIN G CO U N'T Y. WAS N G TO N. SUR F ACE W ATE I ) FIGURE 3.S.1C 2·YEAR 24·HOUR ISOPLUVIALS ) j I ":C_' / , i." \)~ r,'.' /f<' • I ( . • ! ':: !- \ , \. : ~i CV---rv 2-YEAR 24-HOUR PRECIPITATION .. 3.4 -ISOPLUVIALS OF 2·YEAR 24·HOUR TOTAL PRECIPITATION IN INCHES o 1-2 3 .. 5 6 7 8 Mil., 1: 300,000 3.5.1-8 JESIGN MANUAL. 1/90 KIN G C 0 U N T Y. WAS H I N G -0 N. SUR F ACE W ATE R D E FlGURE 3.5.10 5·YEAR 24·HOUR ISOPLUVIALS '-YEAR 24·HOUR PRECIPITATION ~ 4 -ISOPLUVIAlS OF 5-YEAR24·HOUR TOTAL PRECIPITATION IN INCHES o 1 2 3·4 5 6 7 8 Miles 1: 300,000 3.5, 1·9 GNMANUAL I!90 KING COUNTY. WAS! NGTON •. SURFACE WATE' )ESI;GNMANUAL· FIGURE 3.S.1E 10-YEAR M-HOUR ISOPLUVIALS I , \ \ \ , ' ... ~\ 2.1 2.2 2.3 2.4 2.S 10·YEAR 24·HOUR PRECIPITATION ,,3.4-ISOPLUVIALS OF lo-YEAR 24-HOUR TOTAL PRECIPITATION IN INCHES o I 2 3 4 56? 8 Miles 1: 300,000 3.5.1-10 , ., ( KIN G CO U N T Y. WAS H I N G T 0 N. SUR F ACE W ATE R D E" I G N MAN U A L FIGURE 3.S.IF25-YEAR 24'HOUR ISOPLUVIALS '- 5-YEAR 24-HOUR PRECIPITATION ":J~ \ ISOPLUVIALS OF 25-YEAR 24-HOUR TOTAL PRECIPITATION IN INCHES o 1. 2 l 4 5 6 7 8 Miles 1: 300,000 3.5.1-11 , ,----. . \ • I ~. . J 1190 KIN G CO U N T Y, WAS H' 'J TO N, SUR F. ACE W ATE R ~~ !,V ) g I I 0 -~- ~.~ ----------~----------~-----~. 50-YEAR 24-HOUR PRECIPITATION ~f9 1~3.4 -ISOPLUVIALS OF SO-YEAR 24-HOUR ~1 TOTAL PRECIPITATION IN INCHES o 1 2 3.4 5 6 7 a Milos 1: 300,000 3.5.1·12 'SIGN MANUAL "':':oJ .~( ~. ") 1/90 KIN G CO U N T Y. WAS H I N r 0 N. SUR F ACE W ATE R D r 1 G N MAN U A L » \ FIGURE 3.S.lH lOO·YEAR 24·HOUR ISOPLUVIALS O-YEAR 24-HOUR PRECIPITATION -ISOPLUVIALS OF 1DO-YEAR 24-HOUR TOTAL PRECIPITATION IN INCHES. o 1 2 J 4 5 6 7 8 Milos 1: 300,000 3.5.1·13 1/90 KIN G C 0 U N T Y. WAS H T "I G TON. SUR F ACE W ATE R l) E S 1 G N MAN U A L FIGURE 3.5.11 lOO-YEAR 7-DAY ISOPLUVIALS 1 100-YEAR 7-DAY PRECIPITATION -3.4 -ISOPLUVIALS OF 1Q(HEAR 7-DAY TOTAL PRECIPITATION IN INCHES o 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 MUes 1: 300,000 3.5.1-14 1/90 5.0: Conveyance system analysis and performance The conveyance pipe for the project is designed to convey the 25 year storm event as required by city of Renton standards. Please refer to pipe sizing calculation. RECONNAiSSANCE REPORT NO. 13 LOWER CEDAR CREEK BASIN JUNE 1987 Natural Resources and Parks Division and Surface Water Management Division King County, Washington TABLE OF CONTENTS I. SUMMARY II. INTRODUCTION III. FINDINGS IN LOWER CEDAR RIVER BASIN A. Overview of Basin B. Effects of Urbanization C. Specific Problems 1. Drainage and flooding problems 2. Damage to property 3. Destruction of habitat IV. RECOMMENDATIONS FORACTION V.· A. Reduce landslide hazards B. Reduce erosion and flooding C. Prevent future erosion and flooding with appropriate analysis, planning, and policy development D. Stop present (and prevent future) damage to habitat by addressing specific problems in stream systems MAP APPENDICES: APPENDIX A: Estimated Costs APPENDIX B: Capital Improvement Project Ranking APPEDDIX C: . Detailed Findings and Recommendations I I 2 2 4 5 5 6 6 7 7 7 8 8 1l A·I B·I Col I. SUMMARY The Lower Cedar River Basin, in southwest King County, is unique in its development pat- terns and the associated environmental problems that appear throughout the basin. Except for the city of Renton and areas on the Cedar River Valley floor, most of the development in the basin has occurred on the upland plateaus. Most of this development is recent and primarily residential. In addition, the plateau is the site of numerous sand and gravel mining operations and, in the southern uplands, an abandoned coal mine. Peat ·is also being mined north of Otter Lake. In some areas livestock are being raised on small Carms; there are no major crop-related agricultural m:tivities in the basin. The eCCects of development are most apparent where storm drainage is routed over the valley. walls. Impetvious surfaces on the plateau have iDcreased tbe rate and volume of storm runoff, resulting in substantial erosion, siltation, and I\ooding below. In addi- tion, erosion and siltation have damaged or destroyed babitat in many tnbutaries, threatening the survival oC fish. Habitat and ':Vater quality throughout the basin are also threatened by the filling of wetlands and the presence of large amounts or domestic tJasb in some streams. The reconnaissance team noted that the Peterson Creek system has so Car remained in its natural, nearly pristine condition. Maintaining this quality should be a high priority in future basin planning capital project programs. Recommendat ions in the Lower Cedar River Basin include 1) designing and constructing appropriately sized RID and other drainage facilities; 2) establisbing stricter land use policies regarding floodplains, wetlands, and gravel mining; 3) conducting more detailed and comprebensive bydrauliclbydrologic anaJyses of proposed developments; and 4) preventing damage to tbe natural drainage system_ The field team also recommends 5) restoring tbe babitat·of several tributaries (e.g., cleaning gravels, revegetating stream banks, and diversifying streambeds for spawning and rearing) as well as 6) protecting Ibe Dearly pristine quality of Peterson· Creek. . U. INTRODUCnON: History and Goals of tbe Program pole In 1985 the King County Council approved funding for the Planning Division (now called the Natural Resources and Parks Division), in coordination with the SurCace Water Management Division, to conduct a reconnaissance of 29. major drainage basins located in King County. The eCfort began with an initial investigation oC three basins --Evans, Soos, and Hylebos Creeks --in order to determine existing and potential surface water problems and to recommend action to mitigate and prevent these problems. These initial investiga. lions used available data and new fieJd obselVations to examine geology, hydrology, and habitat conditions in each basin. Findings Crom these three basins led the King County Council to adopt Resolution 6018 in April 1986, calling for reconnaissance to be completed on the remaining 26 basins. The Basin Reconnaissance Program, which was subsequently established, is now. an important ele- ment DC surface water management. The goals DC the program are to provide useful data with regard to 1) critical problems needing immediate solutions, 2) basin characteristics Cor use in the preparation oC detailed basin management plans, and 3) capital costs associated with the early resolution of drainage and problems.· The reconnaissance reports are intended to provide an evaluation of present drainage con~ ditions in the County in order to transmit information to policymakcrs to aid them in developing more detailed regulatory measures and specific capital improvement plans. They are not intended to ascribe in any conclusive manner the causes of drainage or erosion P:LC Lower Cedar (continued) River Basin , percent from the present. Most of this growth will occur in the Soos Creek Planning Area. Dominant geological and geomorphic features. The geology of the Lower Cedar River Basin is diverse. Geological formations exposed along the valley include sedimentary rocks, undifferentiated older glacial dri(t, extensive ground moraine deposits, recent alluvium along the Cedar River, and landslide deposits along the river and iis tribu- taries. The sedimentary rocks, composed of moderately dipping sandstones, con- glomerates, mudstones, and shales, are exposed locally along the cliffs of the Cedar River Valley near the mouth of the Cedar River. In addition, the Renton formation, composed of sandstones, mudstones, and shales with periodic deposits of coal, is also exposed along the lower portion of the Lower Cedar River Valley. Undifferentiated glacial deposits found here are composed of three or more till sheets, glacio-fluvial sand and gravel, glacio-lacustrine clay, and sand, and non-glacial sand, clay and thin peat. These lie over the sedimentary rock formations and are best exposed in cross-section along the cliffs of the main valley and major tributaries. The morphology of the Lower Cedar River Basin is dominated by the valley formed by the Cedar River. Valley walls are steep cliffs formed by landslides in glacial sedi- ments. A once extensive and meandering River, which created a wide valley floor as it cut its way westward, the Cedar today is diked for most of its length through the lower valley. A narrow but extensive band of landslide deposits exists along the steep cliffs of the main river and its major tributaries. The landslide deposits consist of deformed blocks of glacial sediments and colluvium derived from slides or mass flowage, such as I,ndslides and debris flows. Recent alluvial deposits fill the valley and major tributaries. Small, composite, alluvial dehris fans exist at the mouths of the largest tributaries. Closed depressions, principally in the uplands, have lacustri~e and peat deposits. The Lower Cedar River Valley has a high potcntial for erosion due to steep slopes and the existence of a clay layer that promotes soil failures. In addition, the confined nature of tributmy channels between steep hillslopes promotes bank erosion during high flows. Numerous recent landslides are evident along cliffs of many of the steep tributaries and along the main stem of the Cedar River. These have been accelerated by the removal of vegetation and the routing of concentrated stann flows over steep slopes in areas where development has occurred. Hydrologic aDd hydraulic characteristics. The Cedar River Basin is composed of a complex drainage network consisting of the Cedar River and 17 lributaries. The larger tributaries begin in lakes or wetlands on the bluffs and flow through relat ively flat, Slable channels to the edge of the Cedar River Valley, then plunge down to the valley floor through steep, erodible ravines. Tributaries of this type such as Tributary 0304 (with headwaters at Wetland 3111) and Tributary 0328 (which begins at L1ke Desire), are found on the south side of the Cedar River. Another type of tributary collects surface 'mnoff from urbanized areas, pastureland~ and wooded areas. Tributaries 0302~ 0307, and 0312 arc examples of this type of tributary. They are intermittent (depending on rainfall), shorter in length~ flow Ihrough shallower channels that arC steeper at the bluffs and transport more material during. times of 3 P:LC Lower Cedar River Basin (continued) pacted fill adjacent to new residences near collection point 5 was washed partly away during the storm, causing landsliding and gullying. Future problems will be similar to these, as commercial and residential developments increase flow rates and volumes by decreasing natural storage and infiltration. This is expected to occur if wetlands on ihe upper plateau are encroached upon or lost (e.g., on Trib. 0304 at RM 2.30 and on Trib. 0304A at Rm 1.60). The preservation of wetlands and streambank vegetation and the attenuation of storm flows arc essential in this basin. c. Specific Problems Identified The steep valley sideslopcs through which streams pass and the often dense upland development result in a number of similar problems that repeat themselves throughout the Lower Cedar River Basin. The most significant of these are outlined and discussed below. 1. Drainage and flooding problems are often tbe result of several conditions: a. Undersized culverts and inadequate entrance structures. The most notable area is on Tributary 0306 al river mile .30~ where a culvert "here was blocked by debris carried downstream by Ihe stream and caused erosion and flooding of Fairwood Golf Course. The blockage was compounded by the fact that the culvert was undersized; the problem will worsen as flows increase from upstream development. b. Serious instream erosion and subsequent downstream sedimentation. These have been caused by three main factors: 1) runoff from residential developments on the bluffs "bove the valley, 2) compacted pastureland due to livestock, and 3) runoff from impervious areas originating at gravel pits. These problems will continue and worsen until mitigative measures arc taken. (See Appendix C for specific examples.) c. Undersized rcchannclized streams. Tributaries on the valley flour are too small to carry the increased flows originating in developed residential areas along the top of the bluffs. For example, Tributary 0302 at river mile .25, the channel along Maplewood Golf COUfsc, overtops and floods during storms. d. e. Construction in wetland aod noodplain areas, Many of the wetlands on the south side of the Cedar River are peat bogs, and roads built through them continue to settle each year, increasing the amount of flooding on Ihe road. For example, the road crossing with Tributary 0328B north of Lake Desire will experience more severe flooding as the road settles. Discbarging of stormwater at tbe top of steep banks. At river mile 2.20 on the Cedar River, a trailer park (constructed on the edge of the cliff) discharges its drainage down the valley wall. Increased flows erode the steep valley, depositing sediments on the valley floor, blocking channels and causing flooding. These problems will eventually stabilize. but only after a large quantity of soil has been eroded. 5 • ~\ \ d. Lo"er Cedar River Basin (continued) Wetland encroachment Encroachment destrovs habitat and eliminates natural water filtration and storage for surfa";' runoff. Examples of this problem were observed on Tributary 0304 at river mile 2.30, Tributary 0308 at .80, and Tributary 0304A at river mile 1.80. Many wellands have already been completely lost through filling, for example on Tributary 0306A at river mile .5~. Suspected violations were forwarded to Building and Land Development for enforcement. IV. RECOMMENDATIONS FOR ACTION P:LC The primary recommendations for action in the Lower Cedar River Basin addresses current severe problems related to erosion, habitat destruction, and nooding. Prevention of these problems will be accomplished by controlling locations and densities of new development and providing adequate RID facilities for stormwater. A Reduce landslide hazards by: 1. Including sensitive areas not previously mapped on the Scnsitive Areas Map Folio (SAMF). See Appendix C for a full listing of sensitive areas. 2 Establishing building setbacks along cliffs and native growth protection casements along Sleep ravines. 3: Discouraging or eliminating the routing of Slormwater over cliffs, unless adequate tightline systems can be constructed to convey nov.'S in a &1fe~ nonerosive manner to the boltom of cliffs. 4. Decreasing peak flows by constructing larger RID facilities to lessen the landslide and erosion occurrence along tributary slopes. B. Reduce erosion and flooding in tbe basin by improving surface water management: 1. Diicct tbe Facilities Management Section or the Surface Water Management Division to evaluate existing Slonn-<letention and conveyance facilities to deter- mine whether they are properly sized to meet cunent standards. Evaluation should begin with all single-orifice RID facilities. 2 Consider areas other tban wetlands as regional Slorm-<ietcntion facilities. Tributary 0300 at river mile .42 is the site for a proposed dam, for example. 3. Utilize existing lower quality wetlandS (tbose rated olber than #1) as regional Slonn-<letention facilities. Wetlands 3102 and 3142 could provide more live slD,rage, for example. 4. 5. Review cbannel and culvert capacity for conveying existing and future runofr, and establish f100dplain areas in regions of slight gradient for existing and future nmoff conditions. Promote tbe inmtration of surface water through the uSe of retention facilities and open cbannels instead of pipes where the soil and slope conditions permit. Collection points 5, 6, and 12 on plateaus have such soil conditions. 7 Lower Cedar River· Basin (conlinued) a. 00 Tnbutary 0304: aean streambed gravels, add habilat and bed-control weirs, and plant bank vegetalion for shade. b. 00 Tnbutary O3OS: Construct a new channel and move slream from road- side channel to its new location on adjacent lands. Implement a full restoration project to provide channel meanders, habitat structures, pool/riffle enhancement, streambed gravel replacement, and revegelation. Co 00 Tnbutary 0303: Move stream from present channel to a location further north, away from the roadside. If relocalion is not possible, these minimum steps should be taken: Add habitat structure to existing channel with root masses, deflectors, boulder clusters, and olher features; revegetate channel banks with shrubs and small trees; enhance stream crossings with boll am less pipe arehes. d. 00 Tnbutary 0328 (peterson Crioek): Add habilat slruclure by replacing Ihe straight, shortened channel with a more natural, meandering one; place habilat slructures (such as rool masses, defleclors, cover logs, and boulder clusters) Ihroughoul Ihe channel; and revegelale banks wilh shrubs common 10 adjacent riparian zones (salmonberry, ninebark, or dogwood, for example). 3. Protect the Peterson Creek system (fnb. 0328) in its present, ncar-pristine state. This win include not only the restoration outlined in section A above, but also the adoption of land use management regulations to prevent future habitat destruction: a. Protect aU existing wetlands within tbe subcatchments of Peterson Creek. Employ wetland buffers al leasl 100 feel wide wilhoul exceplion. b. Restrict development in the criticalhcadwater area (drainage, habitat, water quality) bounded by Late Desire, Otter Late, and Peterson Late 10 rural densities. Co Designate and protect streamside management woes of al least 100 feei from Ihe ordinary high-water mark (OHWM) along Ihe main stem of Ihe creek. Use 25 feel from Ihe OHWM on Iribularies. d. Preserve floodplains and their forests for dynamic retention of sediments and water. e. Restrict ""gelation removal in stteam5ide!wetland management zones. f. . Size RID facilities to store the tOO-year storm at a two-to-five-year release rate. Use the two.<:eU type of pond with a fore bay, a gravel filter, and a vegelated swale outflow where feasible. g. Regulate more cla.;ely aU septic tank and drain-field insta1lations, as well as maintenance schedules, particularly in the Lake Desire, Oller Lake, and Peterson Lake drainage areaS. p~ 9 'I 1 II )1 , I /1 ) .. r-:':--" ---,+. !,'," , L,,,,I,..\I ~" ''',''. -.. , ",' " LOWER CEDAR RIVER BASIN Basin Boundary Subcatchment Boundary ® Collection Point _____ Stream 0299 Tributary Number .3115 Proposed Project o 2 Miles .. /" J (I. \ , \ \ 1.._. ~ .... N {- APPENDIX A ESTIMATED COSTS: PROPOSED CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECTS LOWER CEDAR CREEK BASIN • Indicates project was' identified by Surface Water Management office prior to reconniUssance. NOTE: All projects are located on map included in this report. Project Numher 3105' 3109* P:LCAP A Collect. Point 10 10 Project Description Enhance 2200' of Trih. 0305 from Cedar River to Elliot Bridge. Secure easements to wetland located in Cascade' Park and construct a berm at the outlet. Replace existing catch hasins with control structures. Project should he justified hy a hasin study. Wetland rated #2. (This wetland will require further biologic,,' cv,lIu,uion before RID design and constnJction.) Problem Addressed Mitigates flooding of King County park land. Better utilizes wetland's storage capacity to address peak flows from surroundi~g urban area. A·l ) E.<timated Costs and Comments $115,000 (NOTE: This project was proposed by Surface Water Management, is in the design phase, and will be constructed by 1989.) $186,000 Project Number 311 () 3117 3118 3119 3120 P:LC.APA Collect. Point 21 16 10 4 15 Project Description Raise -existing road embankment 2-4'. Project should be indepen- dently justifi<lblc. (Refer to Roads Division.) Install 1,400' of tightline, a sediment trap, and 700' of channel from Jones Rd. to Cedar River. Project is independently justi- fiable. Install 300' of 36" culvert, a new inlet structure, manhole, and catch basin. Project is independently justifiable. Construct a detention dam and control structure in a deep channelized section of Trib. 0300. Project is independently justifiable .. Construct a sedimentation pond and 1,000' of channel from Jones Rd. to Cedar River. Project is indepen- dently justifiable. Prohlem Addressed Mitigates seasonal flooding of Lake Desire Dr. SE caused by road bed settling in the peat bog. Mitigates severe erosion, sediments deposited on County roads, and flooding during times of high flows. Will prevent blockage of culvert and the accompanying flooding and erosion of Fairwood Golf Course and mobile home park below. Project location is .ideal because it addresses flows from a large residential area before they reach the steep, sensitive area-next to the Cedar River. Miligates flooding of residence and sediment deposition on Jones Rd. A-3 ) Estimated Costs and Comments $73,000 $501,000 $87,000 $159,000 $163,000 APPENDIX B CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECT RANKING LOWER CEDAR RIVER BASIN Prior to the Lower Cedar River Basin field reconnaissance, 12 projects had been identified and 'rated using the CIP selection criteria developed by the Surface Water Management (SWM) and Natural Resources and Parks Divisions. Following the reconnaissance, 13 projects remain proposed for this area. They include eight new, previously unidentified and unrated projects. These displace seven previously selected projects, which were eliminated based on the consensus of the recon- naissance team. Projects were eliminated for several reasons: two sites were annexed by the city of Renton, two projects were found to be unnecessary, two sites were categorized as #1 wetlands (and are' ineligible), . and one project was determined to be infeasible. The previous SWM capital improvement project list for the Lower Cedar RiVer Basin had an esti- mated cost of $2,710,000, while the revised list increases to an estimated cost of S2, 784,000. This 3 percent increase in estimated capital costs is due to the addition of projects after the reconnaissance. The follOwing table summarizes the scores and costs for the CIPs proposed for the Lower Cedar River Basin. These projects were rated according to previously established SWM Program Citizen Advisory Committee criteria. The projects ranked below are those for which the first rating question, ELEMENT 1: "GO/NO GO; could be· answered affirmatively. Projects with scores of 100 or higher can be considered now for merging into the "live" elP list. RANK PROJECT NO. SCORE' COST 1 3122 103 $342,000 2 3118 90 87,000 3 3120 75 i63,000 4 3109" 67 186,000 5 3121 65 371,000 6 3117 60 501,000 7 3115 60 361,000 8 3116 55 73,000 9 3114" 28 134,000 10 3111" 25 175,000 11 3112" 17 117,000 12 3119" 15 159,000 I3 3105 12 115.000 TOTAL $2,784,000 " Projects proposed prior to the Reconnaissance Program P:LCAPB B-1 • All items listed here are located on final display maps --.../ APPENDIX C DETAILED FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS . LOWER CEDAR RIVER BASIN in the offices of Surface water Management, Building and Land Development, and Basin Planning. Trib. & Collect. Existing Anticipated Item' River Mile Point Category Prop. Proi. Conditions and Problems Conditions and Problems 1 5 Geology Gullying and landslides in Continued erosion. uncompacted fill in new development near edge of steep hillslope. 2 18 Geology Small landslide has formed None (natural failure). debris flow (11/86). Sedimentation in yard of residence. 3 0299 4 Geology landSlides in sedimentary Natural failure. RM 2.6 rock in cutbanks adjacent to railroad. 4 0299 16 Geology Drainage from residential· Increasing erosion. RM 9.65 area is resulting in gullying in swale. P: LC.APC C·I -.J Recommendations Recompact fill, revegetate, and drain adequately. None. None. Provide adequate RID to attenuate flows. Item 10 11 12 13 14 15 Trib. & Collect. River Mile Point OZ99.1A RM .08 0300 RM .00-.40 0300 0300 RM lAO 0302 RM .50 0302 RM .80-1.00 21 4 4 4 6 6 P: LC.APC Category Prop. Proi. Hydrology 3116 Geology Hydrology 3119 Hydrology 3109 Geology Geology Existing Conditions and Problems Frequent flooding of county road caused by low road embankment. Extensive channel and bank erosion "and numerous landslides due to development-related stonnwater. Development-related peak flows have caused· sig- nificant bank erosion. Collection point 4 has been nearly completely urbanized. Channel downcutting and bank erosion. Bank e,rosion (medium den- sity) at' meanders ancr . obstructions. C-3 Anticipated Conditions and Problems Road located on top of peat bog and will continue to settle, aggravating flooding problem, Problems will continue. Increased erosion on hillslopes below. Degradation of Trib. 0300. from RM .42 downstream. This section is very 'steep and susceptible to ~rosion. .-,~. . Will continue at same level or increase. Increasing erosion with increasing flow. from devel- opments. ) Recommendations Elevate the road 34' by filling on top of the present road embankmen t. Also stabilize embankment. Provide adequate RID in uplands. (See Project 3119.) Construct detention dam in deep, 'channelized reach of Trib. 0300. Construct benn and standard control structure at outlet to Wetland 3120 in Cascade Park. Control stonn flows from uplands. Provide adequate RID in uplands as area develops . ) Trib. & Collect. Existing Anticipated Item River Mile Point Category Prop. Proj. Conditions and Problems Conditions and Problems Recommendations 22 0302 6 Habitat Trash in stream (auto, Area adjacent to corridor, Remove trash. RM 1.00 tires, appliances). will continue to collect Distribute educational trash and .debris. Further materials to streamside worsening of water quality, residents. sedimentation, erosion. Cite violators, if problem persists. 23 0302 6 Habitat Trash in stream. Water Area adjacent to corridor, Remove trash. RM1.l0 quality problem, will continue to eoUcet Distribute educational unsightly. trash and debris. Further materials to streamside worsening of water qualily. residents. Cite violators, if problem persists. 24 0303 6 Geology Extensive bank erosion in None. Increase RID volumes, slow release upper portions of tribu-rate to nonerosive levels. tary. 25 ~ 6 Habitat Habitat suitable for resi-. Sediments will eventually -Control stormwater volumes RM .25 dent fish. Sediment accu-cover gravels. Habitat and discharge rates from mulating. will become unsuitable for developments. fish use. Manually clean gravels when necessary. 26 0303 6 Habitat Trash and litter in Further decreases in water -Remove trash and litter. RM .35 channel affecting water quality. -Distribute educational materials quality, causing erosion. to streamside residents. Cite violators, if problem persists. P: LC.APC C-5 Trib. & Collect. !!~ River Mile Point 32 33 34 36 37 0304 RM .00 0304 RM .20 0304 RM .62 0304 RM .80 0304A RM 1.30 P: LC.APC 7 7 7 7 7 CatcgoN Prop. Proj. Hal.,itat Habitat Habitat Habitat Hydrology 3102 Existing Conditions and Problems Extensive riffle (to RM .15. Creek channeled. No woody debris, little bank vegetation. Steel head, coho spawners here. Debris jam may oe a partial migration barrier. ,; Debris jam. Bed drops 3' over jam and sediment, forming anadromous barrier. Water turbid; oily sheen and odor present. Storm drains empty directly into stream. Existing forested wetland provides detention for Trib. 0304A and 0304 in heavily developed area. C-7 Anticipated Conditions and Problems Gravels risk becoming cemented. Few resting areas for upstream migrating fish. Debris will continue to accumulate. Channel will likely divert or jam will fail, releasing accumulated sediment. Debris will continue to accumulate. Channel will likely divert or jam will fail, releasing accumu.lated sediment. Water quality will continue to decline as runoff and waste enter stream. Additional storage could be utilized by constructing· berm and weir at outlet. This could be done to atten- uate increased peak flows as upstream area develops. ~ Recommendations Enhance habitat by addi- tion of woody debris in stream. -Revegetate bank. Enhance pool/riffle ratio. Selectively remove debris to allow fish passage. Stabilize large woody debris. Selectively remove debris to allow fish passage. Stabilize large woody debris. . Educate residents about how to maintain water quality. Mark. storm drains with "Dump nO oil" signs. Emphasize recycling of oil. Construct a proportional weir and berm at wetland outlet. Project could be used instead of Project 3107 to rpeserve the #1 rated wetland (where project would be built). ) P: LC.APC C-9 Trio. & Collect. Item River Mile Point 53 54 55 56 57 58 0306 RM .20 0306 RM .30 0306 RM .25 0306 RM .30-.45 0306 RM .30 0306A RM 1.30 P: LC.APC 10 10 11 10 11 Category Prop. Proj. Geology Geology Habitat Geology Hydrology 3118 Hydrology 3122 '" Existing Conditions and Problems Channel downcutting, bank erosion and several landslides, due both from increased storm flows and development along edge. Undersized culvert in arti· ficial fill in golf course threatens to build lake and possibly overtop bank. Breach flood possible. Channel subject to high, damaging flows. Erosion evident. Downcuuing. bank erosion and landslides. Trib. 0306 connects with large tributary at manhole here. Debris from 0306 clOd~ this manhole, causing severe erosion of Fairwood Golf Co"rse. Existing small ponds on 0306A are overtopped and receive considerable silt during high flows. The ponds are located on Fairwood Golf Co"rse. C-11 Anticipated Conditions and Problems Erosion will increa~. Clay layer in valley makes area sensitive to landslides. Possible fill failure: Lake ponded behind culvert in in 1981 and threatened the fill. Further channel damage can be expected. Sediment transport downstream will continue. Will continue or increase in future. Problem will worsen as development upstream continues. Area upstream is developing quickly, thus worsening the problem. \ ) Recommendations Further increase in runoff should be attenuated; this' is a sensitive channel. Enlarge the corregated metal pipe andlor . construct adequate trash rack. Increase RID ca pacity, decrease discharge rate. Attenuate storm flows. Replace existing pipes with larger diameter pipes (if downstream analysis allows for increased flOWS). Install new inlet struc· tures with trash racks. • Acquire easements for ponds and additional area around ponds . and construct detention pond. Location is ideal for addressomg peak flows before they reach the sensitive Cedar Reiver bluffs. Trib. & Collect. lIem River Mile f2i.!!! 64 65 66 67 68 0309 RM.lO 0310 RM .60 Ql!Q RM .05 0310 RM 1.50 0310 RM .25 P: LC.APC 15 15 15 15 15 Category Prop. Proj. Habitat Geology Geology Geology Habitat 3120 Existing Conditions and Problems Subject to heavy, ra pid flows. Channel erosion, deposition bars migration. Sedimentation upstream from culvert due to debris and undersized culvert. New corregated metal pipe con- tinues to pass water through. Severe erosion below culvert, severe sedimen- tation in residence yard. Road drainage forming gully adjacent to road; road bed in danger. Corregated metal pipe is anadromous barrier. c-n Anticipated Conditions and Problems Erosion, deposition will increase. Sediments will migrate downstream. creating a water quality problem. Continued sedimentation. Continued erosion and sedimentation. Continued erosion. Problem will continue. Recommendations -Control storm flows upstream. ) Control volume and discharge rates. -See "Hydrologic and hydraulic characteristics" section in this report. -Install energy dissipator belOW corregated metal pipe. -Excavate channel through yard where original channel was located. Reroute drainage. Refer problem to Roads Maintenance. Reinstall corregated metal pipe at or below bed level. Item 74 75 76 77 Trib. & Collect. River Mile Point 0317 RM 1.60 . 0320 RM 2.40 0318 RM .10 0382 RM .35 19 19 P: LC.APC Category Prop. Proj. Hydrology 3111 Hydrology 3114 Habitat Habitat Existing Conditions and Problems Francis Lake is only hydraulic control [or Trib. 0317. Existing forested wetland with large amount of un~ utilized storage. Wetland currently detains flows on Trib. 0320. Salmonid parr ,in many . pools. Large pools up to 1.75' deep. Some deposi- tion in pools, behind ohstructions. Salmonid use apparent from en rcasses. Sockeye. Chinook spawners. Some sedimentation occurring. C-1S Anticipated Conditions and Problems Trib. 0317 flows through steep area downstream of lake. If area around Francis Lake develops, increased peak flows could cause severe damage to Trib. 0317 in the steep region. If surrounding area urban- izes, this would be a good site to attenuate peak flows. Decrease in water quality with increasing develop- ment. Loss of habitat. Decrease in fish use. System is mostly in natural condition. As development increases, higher flows and worse water quality can be expected. ) Recommendations Construct proportional weir at outlet. Enhance 1,100' from Francis Lake to SE 184th St. Construct containment berm and control structure at outlet of wetland (if bio- logical, analysis permits). Establish and maintain adequate buffers, 100' from ordinary high-water mark or 25' from top fo slope break, whichever is greater. Maintain adequate. stream corridor buffers. Reduce discharge rates to pre-development levels. Prevent clearing, grading within buffers. Description Land Use: 220 Apartment Apartments are rental dwelling unHs that are located within the same building with at least three other dwelling units, lor example quadraplexes and ~1I"types c:>1 apartment buildings. The apartments in this land use include both low-rise'or 'Walk-up· dwellings and high-rise, mU~ilamily'" dwellings. Studies that did not identify whether the apartment was a low'rise or a high-rise were inclUded in this category. Additional Data The peak hour of the generator typically coincides with the peak hour of the adjacent street traffic. The sites were surveyed from the late 1960s to the mid~1990s throughout the United States. and Canada. This land use includes data from a wide variety 'of units with different sizes, price ranges, locations, and ages. Consequently, there is a wide variation in trips generated within this category. As expected, dwelling units that were larger in size, more expensive, or farther away from the central business district (CBD) had a higher rate of trip generation per unit than those smaller in size, less expensive, or closer to the CBD. Other factors, such as geographic location and type of adjacent and nearby development, may also have had an effect on the site trip generation. Source Numbers 2,4,5,6,9,10,11,12,13,14,16,19,20;34,35,40,72,91, 100, 108, 188, 192,204,211,253, 283,357,436 Trip Generation, 6th Edition 299 Institute of Transportation Engineers Average Vehicle .-rip Ends vs: Owelling Units On a: Weekday Number of Studies: 80 Avg. Number of Dwelling Units: 211 Directional Distribution: 50% entering, 50% exiting Trip Generation per Dwelling Unit Average Rate Range of Rates Standard DeViation 6.63 2.00 -11.81 2.98 Data Plot and Equation 7.000'---~----------------------------~------~---------------------' 6,000 5,000 4,000 3,000 2,000 x x: x x 1,000 o 100 200 300 400 500 600 700 800 900 1000 x = Number of Dwelling Units X Actual Data Points -----Fitted Curve ------Average Rate Filled Curve Equation: T = 5.994(X) + 134.114 Trip Generation, 6th Edition 300 Institute of Transportation Engineers Apal1ment (220) Average Vehicle Trip Ends vs: Dwelling Units On a: Weekday, Peak Hour of Adjacent Street Traffic, One Hour Between 7 and 9 a.m. Number of Studies: 69 Avg. Number of Dwelling Units: 238 Directional Distribution: 16% entering. 84% exiting Trip Generation per Dwelling Unit Average Rate Range of Rates Standard Deviation 0.51 0.10 1.02 0;73 Data Plot and Equation 700.---------------------~----------------------------------------_. '" "0 c: W "-~ Q) '0 E ~ <D ~ ~ " f- 600 SOD 400 300 200 100 0 0 100 X Actual Data Points .. , •..... ','. • -',' _ .• _. ',-•..•.. t·· ..... ','. -' ',' _ .... '.'. _ .. '- x . -~ .. -... ···x· -.. -,--. ~;-.:""'.., .~ ...... ~ ......... -.. -.... _ ......... .. x' :x .... ',' .. .. .. " . >xx x X --'" -...... -.. :>Y-........ ---. - -...... x 200 300 400 500 600 700 BOO 900 1000 1100 x = Number of Dwelling Units ----Fftted Curve ---- - -Average Rate Fitted Curve Equation: T = 0.497(X) + 3.238 R2 =0.83 Trip Generation, 6th Edition 301 Institute of Transportation Engineers Apartment (220) . Average Vehicle Trip Ends vs: Dwelling Units On a: Weekday, Peak Hour of Adjacent Street Traffic, One Hour Between 4 and 6 p.m. Number of Studies: 78 Avg. Number of Dwelling Units: 232 Directional Distribution: 67% entering, 33% exiting Trip Generation per Dwelling Unit Average Rate Range of Rates Standard Deviation 0.62 0~10 1.64 0.82 Data Plot and Equation 700,----------------------------------------------------------------, '" -g W a. ~ '" 1i .c Q) > Q) '" ~ Q) ;'( " I- 600 500 400 -..... 300 200 o 100 X Actual Data Points . x :x 200 300 400 500 600 x = Number of Dwelling Units ---Fitted Curve Fitted Curve Equation: T = 0.541(X) + 18.743 Trip Generation, 6th Ed"ion 302 700 BOO 900 1000 1100 ------AverageRate R2 = 0.75 Institute of Transportation Engineers ~~ j .~ ====~~--~--______ ~d " Apartment (220) Average Vehicle Trip Endsvs: On a: Dwelling Units Weekday, A.M. Peak Hour of Generator Number of Studies: 72 Avg. Number of Dwelling Units: 235 Directional Distribution: 28% entering. 72% exiting Trip Generation per Dwelling Unit Average Rate. Range of Rates Standard Deviation 0.56 0.10 1.08 0.77 Data Plot and Equation 700.-----~----~----~----~----~----~--~----~----~----------_, '" "0 c: 1lI 0. ~ Q) <3 :c " > " '" i!! " ~ " I- 600 500 400 300 200 100 X o 100 X Actual Data Points )< .. ~ ----. -·,·x·- ·x >s<>S x x : ....... ' . x 200 300 400 500 600 700 x = Number 01 Dwelling Units -----Fitted Curve Fitted Curve Equation: T = 0.542(X) + 3.005 Trip Generalion, 6th Edition 303 BOO 900 1000 1100 -- - -_. Average Rate R2 = 0.02 Institute 01 Transportation Engineers Apartment (220) Average Vehicle Trip Ends vs: Dwelling Units On a: Weekday, P.M. Peak Hour of Generator Number of Studies: 76 Avg. Number of Dwelling Units: 236 Directional Distribution: 61 % entering, 39% exiting Trip Generation per Dwelling Unit Average Rate Range of Rates Standard Deviation 0.67 0.10 1.64 0.85 Data Plot and Equation .. 800,----------------------------------------------------------------, 700 600 500 -.... 400 .X 300 200 100 o 100 200 X Actual Data Points : x x . , x: x . -' -x- './. -x. X· . -x· : .. _ . x 300 400 500 600 -~ x = Number of Dwelling Units ---Filled Curve Fitted Curve Equation: T = 0.599(X) + 16.500 Trip Generation, 6th Edition 304. -.. :-.. -.. -:-. 700 . 800 900 1000 1100 ------Average Rate R2= 0.80 . Institute of Transportation EngineerS Description Land Use: 224 Rental Townhouse Rental townhouses are townhouse developments with rented rather than owned units and a minimum of two attached units per building structure. Additional Data The peak hour of the generator typically coincides with the peak hour of the adjacent street traffic. The s~e was surveyed in the late 1980s in Monigomery County, Maryland. Source Number 321 Trip Generation, 6th Edition 358 . Instituie of Transportation Engineers Land Use: 224 Rental Townhouse Independent Variables with One Observation The following trip generation data are for independent variables with only one observation. This information is shown in this table only; there are no related plots for these data. Users are cautioned to use these data with care because of the small sample size. Day{[ime Period D II" U'ts we InQ m Weekday A.M. Peak Hour of Adjacent Street Traffic Weekday P.M. Peak Hour cif Adjacent Street TraffiC Weekday A.M. Peak Hour of Generator Weekday P.M. Peak Hour of Generator Trip Generation Rate 0.70 0.72 0.73 0.73 Trip Generation. 6th Edition Size of Independent Variable 103 103 103 103 359 Number of Studies 1 1 1 1 Directional Distribution 33% entering. 67% exiling 51% entering. 49% exiling 35% entering •. 65% exiting 55% entering. 45% exiting Institute of Transportation Engineers i d KING COUNTY, WASV'NGTON. SURFACE WATE-DESIGN MANUAL MAINTENANCE REQUIREMENTS FOR PRIVATELY MAINTAINED. DRAINAGE FACILITIES NO.1 -PONDS Maintenance Component General Sid, Slop •• of Pond Storage Aroa Pond Dike. Emergency Overflow/Spillway , ~-, Del.ct Trash" Oebrie Poisonous Vegetation Pollution Unmowed GreBsl Ground Cova, Rodent Hoi •• In88ct8 Tree Growth Erosion Sediment Sentemontl Rock Missing Condition. When Malntenanee Ie Ne.ded Any trash end debris which exceed 1-cubic foot per 1,000 squa'. '081 (thie.i. about .qu~ to the amount of trBsh it would take to fill up one standard siz8 office gerbage cen). In g8n8rel, there should b. no visual evidence of dumping. Any pol.onou8 vegetation which may conatituta II hazard to County personnel or the public. Examples of polsonou. vegetation include: tansy ragwort. poison o'ok. stinging nettlee. dsvil, club. Oil. gasoline. or other contaminants of one gallon or more .2! Bny amount found thet could: 1) cause damage to plant. animal. or marine life; 2) conetltute • fire hazard; or 3) bo flushMt downstroam during rain storms. If facility Is located in private residential aroa, mowing ii neadDd when grass exceeds 18 inches in height. In other are88, tho general policy i. to make the pond aite match adjacent ground cover and terrain III' long 8e there is no interference with the function of the facility. Any ev;dlllnce .of rodent hole. if facility i. acting 1118. dam or benn. or any ev;denca of water piping through dam or berm vi. rodent holes. . When insect, 8uch 88 wasps and hornets interfere with maintenance activities. Tree growth does not allow maintenance 8c~as8 or interferes with maintenance activity li.8., slope mowing, silt removaf. vectoring, or equipment movements). If tre88 8re not interfering with 8CC8SS, leave tr808 a1~no. Eroded damage ovar 2 inche8 deep wh'era cause of damage i8 still present or where there ie potentiaf for con~nued orosion. AccumulatMt sediment that exceeds 10% of tho designed pond depth. Any part of diko which hes sottlod 4 inchos lowor than the design elevation. O",y one layer of rock exi,ts above native soil in are five 8quare feat or larger. or any exposuro of nativo soil. A-I Reaulte Expected When Maintenance .. Performed Trash and debris cleared hom site. No dang~r of poisonous vegetation where County personnel or the publio might normally bo. (Coordination with Seattle/King County Health Department) No conta,.,unants present other then 8 surfece film. (Coordinetion with Seattle/King County Heelth Department) When mowing is needed. grass/ground COVer should be n:towed-to 2 inches in height. Rodents destroyed and dam or benn -repai;ed. (Coordination with Seattla/King County Health Department) Insects destroyed or removed from site. Trees do not hinder maintenance activities. Selectively cultivate trees such as alders for firewood. Slopes should be stabilized by using approp;iate erosion control meosure(s): e.g .• rock reinforcement. planting 'of gra88. compaction. Sediment cleaned out to designed pond shape and depth: pond ,eseeded if necessary to co~t,ol erosion. Oik 0 should be built back to the design ~Ievation. Replace rocks to design standards. 11/94 KIN G CO U NT Y. WAS H I ~ rON. SUR FA C E W ATE R r; ;[GN MANUAL .NO. 4 -CONTROL STRUCTURE/FLOW RESTRICTOR Maintenance Component General Cleanout Gate tkifice P18t~ Overflow Pipe Manhole Defeet Trash and Debris (Includes Sediment) Structural Damage Oamaged or Missing Damaged or Missing Obstructions Obstructions Conditions 'Nhen Maintenance I. Needed Distance between debris build-up and bottom of orifice plate is less than 1-1/2 feet. Structure is not securely attached to manhole wall and outlet pipe structure should support at !e~st 1,000 pounds of up or down pressure. Structure is not In' upright position (allow up to 10% from plumb). Connections 10 outlet pipe -are not watertight and show signs of rust. My holes -other than designed holes - in the structure. Cleanoul gate is !lot watertight or is missing. Gate cannot be moved up and down by one maintenance person. Chain leading to gate is missing or damaged.· Gate Is rusted over 50% of its surface area. COntrol dev;oe is not working properly due to missing, out of place, or bent orifice plale. Any trash, debris, sediment, or vegetation blocking the plate. Any trash or debris blocking (or having the potential of blocking) the overflow pipe. See MClosed Detention Systems· Standard No.3. See "Catch Basins· Standard No.5. A-4 Results &pected When Maintenance Is Performed All trash and debris removed. --. .. Structure securely attached to wall and oullet pipe .. -Structure in correct position. Connections 10 outlet pipe are watertight; structure repaired or replaced and works as designed. Structure has no holes other than designed holes. Gate Is watertlgtit and works as designed. Gate moves up and down easily and Is watertight. . Chain is in place and works as designed. Gate is repaired or replaced to meet design standards. Plate is fn place and works as designed. Plate is free of-all obstructions and works as designed. Pipe is free of all obstructions and works as designed. See -Closed Detention Systems" Standard No.3. See "Catch Basins" Stan~rd No.5. 1!90 l .. ,-/ (J --I KIN G CO U N T Y, WAS H I N G TON, SUR FA C E W AT L R DES I G N MAN U A L NO.5 -CATCH BASINS Maintenan'ce Component General Defoct Trash &" Debris (Includes Sediment) Structural Damage to Frame and/or Top Slab Cracks in Basin Walls/Bottom SeHlement/ Misalignment Fire Hazard Vegetation Pollution CondItions When Maintenance I, Needed Trash or debris of more than 1/2 cubic foot which is located immediately in 'ront of the catch basin open'lng or is blocking capacity,of basin by more than 10%.' . Trash or debris (in the basin}·that exceeds 1/3 the depth from the bottom of basin to invert of the lowest pipe into or out of the basin. Trash or debris in any inlet or outlet. pipe blocking more than 1/3 of its height. Dead animals or vegetation. that could generate odors tha't would cause complaints or dangerous gases (e.g., methane). Deposits of garbage exceeding 1 cubic foot in volume. Corner-of frame extonds more than 3/4 inch past curb face into tho streot (If' applicable). Top slab has halos larger than 2 square inches or cracks wider than 1/4 i.nch (intent is to make sure all material is running into the basin). Frame not sitting flush on top slab,· i.e., separation of more than 3/4 inch of the· frame from the top slab. Cracks wider than 1/2 inch and longor than 3 feet, any evidence of soil 'particles entering catch basin through cracks, or maintenance person judges that structure is unsound. Cracks wider than 1/2 inch and longer than 1 foot at the joint of any in~etJoutlet pipe or any evidence of soil particles . entering catch basin through cracks. Basin has settled more than 1 inch or has rotated more than 2 inches out of alignment. Presence of chemicals such as natural gas, oil, and gasoline. Vegetation growing across and blocking more than 10% of the basin opening. Vegetation growing in inlel/outlet pipe joints that is more than s'rx inches taUand less than six inches apart. Nonflammable chemicals of more than 1/2 cubic loot per three leet of basin length. A-5 Results Exp-ected Whon Maintenance I, Performed No trash or debris located immediately in front of cat~b~ basi~ opening. No trash or debris in the catch basin, Inlet and outlet pipes free of trash or debris. No. dead animals or vegetation present within the catch basin. No condition ·present which would attract or support the breeding of insects or rodents. Frame is even with curb. Top slab is free of holes and cracks; Frame is Sitting flush on top sl!lb. Basin replaced or repaired to design standards. No cracks more than 1/4 inch wide at the joint of inlef/outlet pip~, Basin replaced or repaired to design standards. ' No flammable chemicals present. No vegeta.tion blocking opening to basin. No vegetation or root growth present. No pollution present other than surface film:-. 1/90 ( KIN G C 0 U N T Y, WAS H I l\ rON, SUR FA C E W ATE R [ >IGN MANUAL . NO.5 -CATCH BASINS (Continued) Maintenance Component Catch Basin Cover Ladder Metal Grates [If applicable) De'&Ct Cover Not in Place ~ Locking Mechanism Not Working Cover DiHicult to Remove Ladder Rungs Unsafe Trash and Debris Damaged,or Missing Condition. When Maintenance I. Needed Cover Is missing or only partially in place. My open catch basin requires maintenance. Mechanism cannot be opened by one maintenance per~n with proper tools. Bolts Into frame have less than 1/2 Inch of thread. One maintenance person cannot remove lid ,after applying 80 Ibs. of lift; Intent Is keep cover from seallng"off access to maintenance .. Ladder Is unsafe due to misSing rungs, misalignment," rust, cracks. or sharp edges. Grate with opening wider than 7/8 inch. Trash and debris that is blocking more than 20% of grate surface. Grate missing or broken member(s) of the grate. A-6 Ruult~ Expe<:ted \l/hen Maintenance Is Performed Catch basin cover is closed. Mechanism opens with proper tools. Cover can be removed by one maintenance person. Ladder meets design standards and allows maintenance pinson safe access. Grate openings meet design standards. Grate free of trash and debris. Grate is. in place and meets des'lgn standards. 1/90 " (: KIN G C a U N T Y, W A I I N G TON, SUR F ACE W A', NO.8 -FENCING Maintenance Componen~ General Wire Fences Defect Missing or Broken Parts Erosion uamaged Parts Deteriorated Paint or Protective . Coating Openings in Fabric Conditions When Maintenance I, 'Needed My defect in the fence that permits easy entry to a faCility. Parts broken or missing. Erosion-more than 4 Inches high and 12· 18 Inches wide permit1ing an opening under a fence, Posts out of plumb"more than 6 Inches. Top ',ails bent more than 6 inches. Any part of fence Oncludlng posts,·top rails, and fabric) more than 1 foot out of design alignment. Missing or loose tension wire. Missing or loose barbed wire that is sagging more than 2·1/2 inches between posts. EXtension arm missing, broken, or bent out of shape more than 1·1/2 inches. Part or parts that have a rusting or scaling condition that has aHected structural adequacy. Openings in fabric are such that an 8- inch-diameter ball could fit through. A-9 R DESIGN MANUAL Reaults Expected When Maintenance I. Performed Parts in place to provide adequate security. • Broken or missing parts replaced. No opening under the fence that exceeds 4 inches in height. Posts plumb to· within 1-1/2 inches. Top railhee of bends greater than 1 Inch. Fence is aligned and meels design standards. Tension wire in pl~ce and holding fabric. Barbed wire in place with less than 3/4- inch sag between posts. Extension arm in place with no bends larger than 3/4 inch. Structurally adequate posts or parts with a uniform protective coating.· No openings in fabric. 1/90 • KIN G C 0 U N T Y, WAS NO, 9 -GATES Maintenance Component General Detect Damaged or Missing Members Openings In" Fabric N G TON, SUR FA C E W A T J Condition, 'When Maintenance I. N&edod Missing gate or locking qttvlces. Broken or missing hinges such that gale cannot be easily opened and closed by a maintenance person. Gate Is Qut of plumb more than 6 Inches and more than 1 foot out of design alignment. Missing stretcher bar, stretcher bands, and tle8. ; See -Fencing-Standard No. 8 A-lO DESIGN MANUAL Relutt. Expected When Maintenance J. Performed Gates and '<?cking. devices in place. Hinges intact and lu~. Glle is working freely. Gale is aligned and vertic,,:' Slretcher bar, bands, and ties in place. See -Fencing-Standard No.8 1t90 (; KIN G C 0 U N T Y, W A 1:. .1 I N G TON, SUR F ACE W AT. .( DES I G N MAN U A L NO. 10 -CONVEYANCE SYSTEMS (Pipes & Ditches) Maintenance Comp?nent Pipes Open Ditches Catch Basins Debris Barriers (o.g., Trash Rack) Defect Sediment & Debris Vegetation Damaged Trash & Debris Sediment Vegetation Erosion Damage to Slopes Rock Uning Out 01 Place or Missing (If Applicable) Condltlons When Maintenance II Needed Accumulated sediment that exceeds 20% of the diameter of the pipe. Vegetation that reduces free movement of water thf::Oug~ p!pes. Protective 9Qating Is damaged; rust is causing more" than 50% deterioration to any part of pipe. . My dent that decreases the cross section ar88 of pipe by more than 20%. Trash and debris exceeds 1 cubic foot per 1 ,(x)() square teet of ditch and slopes. Accumulated sediment that exceeds 20% of the design depth. Vaget,ation thQt redu~s free moverr~ent of water through ditches. See ~Ponds· Standard No. 1 Maintenance person can see native soil beneath the rock lining. See "Catch Basins· Standard No.5 'See "Debris Barriers" Standard No. '6 A-l1 Results Expect&d When-Maintenance Is Performed Pipe cleaned of a'l~ sediment and debris. --. .. NI vegetation removed so water flows freely through pipes. Pipe repaired or replaced. , Pipe repaired or replaced: Trash and debris cleared from ditches. Ditch cleaned/flushed of all sediment and debris so that it matches design. Water flows freely through ditches. See "Ponds~ Standard No: 1 Replace rocks to design standard. See "Catch Basins'" Standard No. 5 See "Debris Barriers" Standard. No.6 1/90 KIN G CO U NT Y, WAS HI N o N, SUR F ACE W ATE R D IGN MANUAL ",0. 11 -GROUNDS (Landscaping) Maintenance Component General Trees and Shrubs Defe<:t Weeds (Nonpoisonous) Safety Haz ard Trash or Uttor Damage Condition. When Maintenance I. NeedCKt \:Veeds growing in more than 20% of the landscaped area (trees and shrubs only). Any presence 01 poison ivy or other poiSonous vegetation. . Paper, can, bottles, totalling more than 1 cubic loot within a landscaped area (troes and shrubs only) 01 1 ,(X')() square feet. Umbs or parts of tree.s or shrubs that are split or broken which affect more than 25% of the total toliage of the tree or shrub. Trees or shrubs that have been blown down or knocked oYer. Trees or shrubs which Bfe not adequately' supported or are leaning over, causing exposure of the rootS. . A-12 Results Expected When Maintenance Is Performed . Weeds present in less than 5% of the . landscaped area. -No poisonous vegetation present in a landscaped area. Alea clear of litter. Trees and shrubs with less than 5% of the total foliage with split or broken limbs. Tree or shrub in place free of injury. Tree or shrub in place and adequately· supported; remo";e any dead or diseased trees. 1190 KIN G CO U NT Y, W" ~ H I N G TON, SUR FA C E W A " _ R DES I G N MAN U A L NO. 12 -ACCESS ROADS/EASEMENTS Maintenance Component Gener.al Road Surface Shoulders and Ditches Trash and Debris Blocked Roadway Settlement. Potholes. Mush Spots, Ruts Vegetation in Road Surface Erosion Damage Weeds and Brush Condition a 'Nhen Malntonance ,_ Needed Trash and debris exceeds 1 cubic toot per 1.000 square feel, I.e., trash and debris would fill up one standard size garbage can. Debris' which could damage vehicle tires (glass or metal). My obstructions which reduce clearance abo .... e road surface to less than 14 feet. My obst~uctions restricting'the accoss to a 10.. to 12-1001 width tor a distance of more than 12 feet or any point restricting access to less than a 1().foot width. Y'Yhen any surface defect exceeds 6 inches in depth and 6 square feel In area. In general, any surface defect which hinders or prevents maintenance acceSs. Weeds growing in the rood surface Ihat are more than 6 inches tall and less than 6 inches apart within a 400-square·!oot area. Erosion within 1 foot of the roadway more than 8 Inches wide and 6 inches deep. Weeds and brush exceed 18 inches in height /?r hinder maintenance access, \ A-I3 Results Expo<::ted Mlen Maintenance Is Performed Trash and debris cleared from site. Roadway free of debris which could damage tires, Roadway overhead clear to 14 feet high. Obstruction removed to allow at loast a 12·foot access. Road surface uniformly smooth with no evidence of settlement, potholes, mush spots, .. or ruls, Road surface free of weeds taller than 2 inches. Shoulder free of erosion and matching the surrounding road. Weeds and' brush cut to 2 inches In hetght or cleared In such a way as to allow maintenance access. 1/90 Printed: 06-10-2004 Payment Made: UTY OF RENTON 1055 S. Grady Way Renton, WA 98055 Land Use Actions RECEIPT Permit#: LUA04-061 06/10/200411:37 AM Receipt Number: Total Payment: 2,011.84 Payee: A3 INVESTMENTS LLC Current Payment Made to the Following Items: Trans Account Code Description 5008 000.345.81.00.0004 Binding Site/Short Plat 5010 000.345.81.00.0007 Environmental Review 5020 000.345.81.00.0017 Site Plan Approval 5955 000.05.519.90.42.1 Postage Payments made for this receipt Trans Method Description Amount Payment Check #2017 2,011.84 Account Balances Amount 1,000.00 500.00 500.00 11. 84 Trans Account Code Description Balance Due 3021 5006 5007 5008 5009 5010 5011 5012 5013 5014 5015 5016 5017 5018 5019 5020 5021 5022 5023 5024 5036 5909 5941 5954 5955 5998 303.000.00.345.85 000.345.81.00.0002 000.345.81.00.0003 000.345.81.00.0004 000.345.81.00.0006 000.345.81.00.0007 000.345.81.00.0008 000.345.81.00.0009 000.345.81.00.0010 000.345.81.00.0011 000.345.81.00.0012 000.345.81.00.0013 000.345.81.00.0014 000.345.81.00.0015 000.345.81.00.0016 000.345.81.00.0017 000.345.81.00.0018 000.345.81.00.0019 o 000.345.81.00.0024 000.345.81.00.0005 000.341.60.00.0024 000.341.50.00.0000 604.237.00.00.0000 000.05.519.90.42.1 000.231.70.00.0000 Park Mitigation Fee Annexation Fees Appeals/Waivers Binding Site/Short Plat Conditional Use Fees Environmental Review Prelim/Tentative Plat Final Plat PUD Grading & Filling Fees Lot Line Adjustment Mobile Home Parks Rezone Routine Vegetation Mgmt Shoreline Subst Dev Site Plan Approval Temp Use or Fence Review Variance Fees Conditional Approval Fee Comprehensive Plan Amend Booklets/EIS/Copies Maps (Taxable) Special Deposits Postage Tax .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 R0403110