The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutLUA-05-097CITY OF RENTON PLANNING / BUILDING / PUBLIC WORKS MEMORANDUM Date: November 16, 2005 To: City Clerk's Office From: Stacy Tucker Subject: Land Use File Closeout Please complete the following information to facilitate project closeout and indexing by the City Clerk's Office. Project Name: Lindberg, Annexation Prezone LUA (file) Number: LUA-05-097, A, PZ, ECF Cross-References: AKA's: Project Manager: Don Erickson Acceptance Date: August 29, 2005 Applicant: City of Renton Owner: Contact: PID Number: 152305904806; 152305908203; 152305917709; 152305920703; 152305904400; 152305903709; 152305922709; 152305920505; 152305920604; 152305922303; 152305922204 ERC Approval Date: September 20, 2005 ERC Appeal Date: October 10, 2005 Administrative Denial: Appeal Period Ends: Public Hearing Date: Date Appealed to HEX: By Whom: HEX Decision: Date: Date Appealed to Council: By Whom: Council Decision: Date: Mylar Recording Number: Project Description: The applicants for the proposed Lindberg Annexation have requested that the City prezone the subject site in advance of annexation, pursuant to RCW 35A.14.330, so zoning will be in place at the time the subject site comes into the City. The City is proposing to prezone this 9.72 acre proposed annexation area R-8. This corresponds with the Residential Single Family designation in Renton's Comprehensive Plan. Whereas the proposed annexation is considered to be a non-project action under SEPA, the proposed zoning is not. Location: This site is to the east of 138th Ave SEt Duvall Ave NE, north of 132nd St SEt NE 2nd St, south of City limits, and extends apprOXimately 200 ft. east of 140th Ave SE. Comments: STATE OF WASHINGTON, COUNTY OF KING} AFFIDA VIT OF PUBLICATION PUBLIC NOTICE Tom Meagher, being first duly sworn on oath that he is the Legal Advertising Representative of the King County Journal a daily newspaper, which newspaper is a legal newspaper of general circulation and is now and has been for more than six months prior to the date of publication hereinafter referred to, published in the English language continuously as a daily newspaper in King County, Washington. The King County Journal has been approved as a Legal Newspaper by order of the Superior Court of the State of Washington for King County. The notice in the exact form annexed was published in regular issues of the King County Journal (and not in supplement form) which was regularly distributed to its subscribers during the below stated period. The annexed notice, a Public Notice was published on September 26,2005. The full amount of the fee charged for said foregoing publication is the sum ~\\\\""UI"'II. .. ,'" _~ L. 8.<1 .b:l, ... '!!t.' .v .... -· .. ~ ... r ~ ~ $ "'tq .... ~OT.<\J?";:.:;" ~ Tom Meagher I l \ 9t ~ Legal Advertising Representative, King County Journal = ~ [ 14 EXF: \ = Subscribed and sworn to me this 28th day of September, 2005.S _~\ 1281'2009! ~ i ___ ";' e. I ~ ~ ~ ~ • ~ •• ',0;:: . ~ o· "<UaUl .... r~-~ . ~ 'P • ...... ·.:-<~v~ ~',I WAS\\l.\,,'" Jody lVsarton "1I1UU'''\\ Notary Public for the State of Washington, Residing in Auburn, Washington PO Number: Cost of publishing this notice includes an affidavit surcharge. NOTICE OF ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COMMITTEE RENTON, WASHINGTON The Environmental Review Com- mittee has issued a Determination of Non-Significance for the following pro- ject under the authority of the Renton Municipal Code. Lindberg Annexation Prezone LUA05-097, A, PZ, ECF Location: This site is to the east of 13Sth Ave SEI Duvall Ave NE, north of 132nd St SEI NE 2nd St, south of City limits, and extends approximately 200 ft. east of 140th Ave SE. It is bounded by Renton City limits on three sides and the proposed Mosier II annexation on the fourth side. The applicants for the proposed Lindberg Annexation have requested that the City pre- zone the subject site in advance of annexation, pursuant to RCW 35A.14.330, so zoning will be in place at the time the subject site comes into the City. The City is proposing to prezone this 9.72 acre proposed annexation area R-S. This corresponds with the Resi- dential Single Family designation in Renton's Comprehensive Plan. Whereas the proposed annexation is considered to be a non-project action under SEPA, the proposed zoning is not . Appeals of the environmental determination must be filed in writing on or before 5:00 PM on October 10, 2005. Appeals must be filed in writ- ing together with the required $75.00 application fee with: Hearing Exam- iner, City of Renton, 1055 South Grady Way, Renton, WA 9S055. Appeals to the Examiner are governed by City of Renton Municipal Code Sec- tion 4-S-110.B. Additional information regarding the appeal process may be obtained from the Renton City Clerk's Office, (425) 430-6510. Published in the King County Journal September 26, 2005. #849491 Date: To: From: CITY OF RENTON MEMORANDUM October 12, 2005 File Environmental Review Committee Subject: Lindberg Annexation Prezone LUA05-097, A, PZ, ECF This letter is to inform you that the appeal period has ended for the Environmental Review Committee's (ERG) Determination of Non-Significance for the above-referenced project. No appeals were filed on the ERC determination. This decision is final. CITY OF RENTON CURRENT PLANNING DIVISION AFFIDAVIT OF SERVICE BY MAILING On the 23 rd day of September, 2005, I deposited in the mails of the United States, a sealed envelope containing ERC Determination documents. This information was sent to: Agencies See Attached (Signalure of Sender):7~ ~ STATE OF WASHINGTON ) ) SS COUNTY OF KING ) I certify that I know or have satisfactory evidence that Stacy Tucker signed this instrument and acknowledged it to be his/her/their free and voluntary act for the uses and purposes mentioned in the instrument. Dated: /0 -&~O.J -......:....:.....----.:..---- Notary (Print): My appointment expires: Lindberg Annexation Prezone LUA05-097, A, PZ, ECF template· affidavit of service by mailing Dept. of Ecology * Environmental Review Section PO Box 47703 Olympia, WA 98504-7703 WSDOT Northwest Region * Attn: Ramin Pazooki King Area Dev. Serv., MS-240 PO Box 330310 Seattle, WA 98133-9710 US Army Corp. of Engineers * Seattle District Office Attn: SEPA Reviewer PO Box C-3755 Seattle, WA 98124 Jamey Taylor * Depart. of Natural Resources PO Box 47015 Olympia, WA 98504-7015 KC Dev. & Environmental Servo Attn: SEPA Section 900 Oakesdale Ave. SW Renton, WA 98055-1219 Metro Transit Senior Environmental Planner Gary Kriedt AGENCY (DOE) LETTER MAILING (ERe DETERMINATIONS) WDFW -Stewart Reinbold * Muckleshoot Indian Tribe Fisheries Dept. * c/o Department of Ecology Attn: Karen Walter or SEPA Reviewer 3190 160lh Ave SE 39015 -172nd Avenue SE Bellevue, WA 98008 Auburn, WA 98092 Duwamish Tribal Office * Muckleshoot Cultural Resources Program * 4717 W Marginal Way SW Attn: Ms Melissa Calvert Seattle, WA 98106-1514 39015 172nd Avenue SE Auburn, WA 98092-9763 KC Wastewater Treatment Division * Office of Archaeology & Historic Environmental Planning Supervisor Preservation* Ms. Shirley Marroquin Attn: Stephanie Kramer 201 S. Jackson ST, MS KSC-NR-050 PO Box 48343 Seattle, WA 98104-3855 Olympia, W A 98504-8343 City of Newcastle City of Kent Attn: Mr. Micheal E. Nicholson Attn: Mr. Fred Satterstrom, AICP Director of Community Development Acting Community Dev. Director 13020 SE 72 nd Place 220 Fourth Avenue South Newcastle, WA 98059 Kent, W A 98032-5895 Puget Sound Energy City of Tukwila Municipal Liason Manager Steve Lancaster, Responsible Official Joe Jainga 6300 Southcenter Blvd. 201 South Jackson Street KSC-TR-0431 PO Box 90868, MS: XRD-01W Tukwila, WA 98188 Seattle, WA 98104-3856 Bellevue, WA 98009-0868 Seattle Public Utilities Real Estate Services Title Examiner 700 Fifth Avenue, Suite 4900 PO Box 34018 Seattle, WA 98124-4018 Note: If the Notice of Application states that it is an "Optional DNS", the marked agencies and cities will need to be sent a copy of the checklist, PMT's, and the notice of application. * Also note, do not mail Jamey Taylor any of the notices she gets hers from the web. Only send her the ERC Determination paperwork. template -affidavit of service by mailing ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION ISSUANCE OF A DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE (DNS) POSTED TO NOTIFY INTERESTED PERSONS OF AN ENVIRONMENTAL ACTION PROJECT NAME: Lindberg Annexation Prezone PROJECT NUMBER: LUAOS-097, A, PZ, ECF LOCATION: This site 'I to the ... t o1138th Ave SEI DUYall Ave HE, north of 132nd St SEt NE 2nd St, south of City limit., and extend, approximately 200 ft. east of 140th Ave SE. It Is bounded by Renton City limits on thr •• sid •• and the proposed Mosl ... 11 annexation on the fourth lid •. DESCRIPTION: The applicant. tor the propoled Lindberg Annexation have reque.ted that the City prezone the subject site In advance of annexation, pursuant 10 RCW 35A.14.330, 10 zoning will be In place at the time the subject sHe com •• Into the City. The City I. proposing to prezone this 9.72 acre proposed annexation area Rw 8. Thl, corre.ponds with the Ruld_ntlal Single Family designation In Renton's Comprehensive Plan. Whereas the proposed annexation Is considered to be a non-prolect action under SEPA, the proposed zoning Is not. THE CITY OF RENTON ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COMMITIEE (ERC) HAS DETERMINED THAT THE PROPOSED ACTION DOES NOT HAVE A SIGNIFICANT ADVERSE IMPACT ON THE ENVIRONMENT. Appeals of the environmental determination must be filed In writing on or before 5:00 PM on October 10, 2005. Appeals must be flied In writing together with the required $75.00 application fee with: Hearing Examiner, City of Renton, 1055 South Grady Way. Renton, WA 98055. Appeal. to the Examiner are governed by City of Renton Municipal Code Section 4-8-110.B. Additional Information regarding the appeal process may be obtained from the Renton City Clerk's Office. (425) 430-.6510. IF THE ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION IS APPEALED, A PUBLIC HEARING WILL BE SET AND ALL PARTIES NOTIFIED. -~: I , , 4th St t7j ~ !: ~i'l ::i"" .r.:T =. ~. -f3: .1 ' ,-"_I ,"I 1--, ~i I ' .w-.~.--=_J 'io! t7j , , .... C:' : Jf ~ ~ PI· L-, '_ '/.' : ': 0\ l._-~_J.-7 __ ,~ ~ Sl i36th S .- ~~~erg Annexation ~oo e:t~7.".:::---"'.-.""'" ::-:-:~=-. I 48(lO FOR FURTHER INFORMATION, PLEASE CONTACT THE CITY OF RENTON, DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DIVISION AT (425) 430-7200. DO NOT REMOVE THIS NOTICE WITHOUT PROPER AUTHORIZATION Please Includa _ project NUMBER when OIIlIInll for proper ftla Identification. CERTIFICATION ---"""\ ~ d '> ---~ R.~~\, I, or ~'l ,hereby certify that J copies of the above ~iOA;'~ 'I, were posted by me in __ conspicuous places or nearby the described ProR¢taf.cftf AI ~~ •• ~ \ k ~ t:t":"O NOTARy 1>: ~ DATE Cl /' " '? " , ,f\ .4'l / I.. () -. iT! • : I , !?L~/t) S SIGNED: V,JIJ'<. ~ ~ ~ :. Ptlf)~ C/)} r7 ,~. I: A TrEST: Subscribed and sworn before me, a Notary Public, in and for the State of Washington reSidin'g·1;., •••• '?~ 19_\)b ...... . '. "'" ~........ . ~a4-ttte ,onthe % day of ¥£Urnl:;er or _ Uf}{,,-uan4t {( "~ ~ NOTARY PUBLIC SIGNATURE: ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION ISSUANCE OF A DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE (DNS) POSTED TO NOTIFY INTERESTED PERSONS OF AN ENVIRONMENTAL ACTION PROJECT NAME: PROJECT NUMBER: LOCATION: Lindberg Annexation Prezone LUA05-097, A, PZ, ECF This site Is to the east of 13Sth Ave SE/ Duvall Ave NE, north of 132nd St SEt NE 2nd St, south of City limits, and extends approximately 200 ft. east of 140th Ave SE. It is bounded by Renton City limits on three sides and the proposed Mosler II annexation on the fourth side. DESCRIPTION: The applicants for the proposed Lindberg Annexation have requested that the City prezone the subject site In advance of annexation, pursuant to RCW 35A.14.330, so zoning will be In place at the time the subject site comes Into the City. The City Is proposing to prezone this 9.72 acre proposed annexation area R-S. This corresponds with the Residential Single Family designation In Renton's Comprehensive Plan. Whereas the proposed annexation Is considered to be a non-project action under SEPA, the proposed zoning Is not. THE CITY OF RENTON ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COMMITTEE (ERC) HAS DETERMINED THAT THE PROPOSED ACTION DOES NOT HAVE A SIGNIFICANT ADVERSE IMPACT ON THE ENVIRONMENT. Appeals of the environmental determination must be flied In writing on or before 5:00 PM on October 10, 2005. Appeals must be flied In writing together with the required $75.00 application fee with: Hearing Examiner, City of Renton, 1055 South Grady Way, Renton, WA 9S055. Appeals to the Examiner are governed by City of Renton Municipal Code Section 4-8-110.B. Additional Information regarding the appeal process may be obtained from the Renton City Clerk's Office, (425) 430-6510. IF THE ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION IS APPEALED, A PUBLIC HEARING WILL BE SET AND ALL PARTIES NOTIFIED. 4th w:" (.(). i <1.>, :> ~:, --ft:trIb\CIt'jIUmli -MntAIonB~ _ A"'~ o • "" r-.....,---,-,'; I; .,~. i;" ,-" ,.4...1 11 §;'I" I ~ .. q d,;jl.N,i N ' L~ L.i.-'., , en· ,i ~ <I: -SE 1.36th S ~ 400 800 ,oj I: 4800 FOR FURTHER INFORMATION, PLEASE CONTACT THE CITY OF RENTON, DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DIVISION AT (425) 430-7200. DO NOT REMOVE THIS NOTICE WITHOUT PROPER AUTHORIZATION Please include thepr()j~ctNtJMBER when calUh9'fqr properfil~ ,identification. CITY OF RENTON MEMORANDUM Date: September 23,2005 To: File From: Environmental Review Committee Subject: Lindberg Annexation Prezone LUA05-097, A, PZ, ECF The Environmental Review Committee (ERC) has completed their review of the environmental impacts of the above-referenced project. The Committee, on September 20, 2005, decided the project would be issued a Determination of Non-Significance. The City of Renton ERC has determined that it does not have a probable significant adverse impact on the environment. An Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) is not required under RCW 43.21 C.030(2)(c). This decision was made by the ERC under the authority of Section 4-6-6, Renton Municipal Code, after review of a completed environmental checklist and other information, on file with the lead agency. This information is available to the public on request. Appeals of the environmental determination must be filed in writing on or before 5:00 PM on October 10, 2005. Appeals must be filed in writing together with the required $75.00 application fee with: Hearing Examiner, City of Renton, 1055 South Grady Way, Renton, WA 98055. Appeals to the Examiner are governed by City of Renton Municipal Code Section 4-8-110.B. Additional information regarding the appeal process may be obtained from the Renton City Clerk's Office, (425) 430-6510. If the Environmental Determination is appealed, a public hearing date will be set and all parties notified. ~4~ ,,» ..&L -Kathy Keolker-Whee1er, Mayor September 23, 2005 Washington State Department of Ecology Environmental Review Section PO Box 47703 Olympia, WA 98504-7703 CIT-.F RENTON Planning/BuildinglPublic Works Department Gregg Zimmerman P.E., Administrator Subject: Environmental Determinations Transmitted herewith is a copy of the Environmental Determination for the following project reviewed by the Environmental Review Committee (ERG) on September 20, 2005: DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE PROJECT NAME: PROJECT NUMBER: LOCATION: DESCRIPTION: Lindberg Annexation Prezone lUAO~097,A,PZ,ECF This site is to the east of 138th Ave Set Duvall Ave NE, north of 132nd St Set NE 2nd St, south of City limits, and extends approximately 200 ft. east of 140th Ave SE. It is bounded by Renton City limits on thre.e sides and the proposed Mosier II annexation on the fourth side. The applicants for the proposed Lindberg Annexation have requested that the City prezone the subject site. in advance of annexation, pursuant to RCW 35A.14.330, so zoning will be in place at the time the subject site comes into the City. The. City is proposing to prezone this 9.72 acre proposed annexation .area R-8. This corresponds with the Residential Single Family de.signation in Renton's Comprehensive Plan. Whereas the proposed annex~tion is considered to be a non-project action under SEPA, the proposed zoning is not. Appeals of the environmental determination must be filed in writing on or before 5:00 PM on October 10, 2005. Appeals must be filedin writing together with the required $75.00 application fee with: Hearing Examiner, City of Renton, 1055 South Grady Way, Renton, WA 98055. Appeals to the Examiner are governed by City of Renton Municipal Code Section 4-8-11 O.B. Additional information regarding the appeal process may be obtained from the Renton City Clerk's Office, (425) 430-6510. If you have questions; please call me at (425) 430-6578. For the Environmental Review Committee, Erika Conkling Associate Planner cc: King County Wastewater Treatment Division WDFW, Stewart Reinbold David F. Dietzman, Department of Natural Resources WSDOT, Northwest Region Duwamish Tribal Office Karen Walter, Fisheries, Muckleshoot Indian Tribe (Ordinance) Melissa Calvert, Muckleshoot Cultural Resources Program US Army Corp. of Engineers Stephanie Kramer, Office of Archaeology & Historic Pres.ervation _E-n-cl-os-u-re---I-05-5-S-0-u-th-G-r-ad-Y-W-a-Y-_-R-e-n-to-n-, W-as-h-in-g-to-n-9-8-0-55-------~ ® This paperrontains 50% recycled material, 30% post consumer AHEAD OF THE CURVE CITY OF RENTON DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE APPLICATION NO(S): LUA05-097, A, PZ, ECF APPLICANT: Don Erickson, City of Renton -EDNSP PROJECT NAME: Lindberg Annexation Prezone DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSAL: The applicants for the proposed Lindberg Annexation have requested that the City prezone the subject site in advance of annexation, pursuant to RCW 35A.14.330, so zoning will be in place at the time the subject site comes into the City. The City is proposing to prezone this 9.72 acre proposed annexation area R-8. This corresponds with the Residential Single Family designation in Renton's Comprehensive Plan. Whereas the proposed annexation is considered to be a non-project action under SEPA, the proposed zoning is not. LOCATION OF PROPOSAL: LEAD AGENCY: This site is to the east of 138th Ave SE/ Duvall Ave NE, north of 132nd St SE/ NE 2nd St, south of City limits, and extends approximately 200 ft. east of 140th Ave SE. It is bounded by Renton City limits on three sides and the proposed Mosier II annexation on the fourth side. The City of Renton Department of Planning/Building/Public Works Development Planning Section This Determination of Non-Significance is issued under WAC 197-11-340. Because other agencies of jurisdiction may be involved, the lead agency will not act on this proposal for fourteen (14) days. Appeals of the environmental determination must be filed in writing on or before 5:00 PM on October 10, 2005. Appeals must be filed in writing together with the required $75.00 application fee with: Hearing Examiner, City of Renton, 1055 South Grady Way, Renton, WA 98055. Appeals to the Examiner are governed by City of Renton Municipal Code Section 4-8-11 O.B. Additional information regarding the appeal process may be obtained from the Renton City Clerk's Office, (425) 430-6510. PUBLICATION DATE: DATE OF DECISION: SIGNATURES: September 26, 2005 September 20, 2005 DATE} 1 STAFF REPORT City of Renton Department of Economic Development, Neighborhoods and Strategic Planning ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COMMITTEE A. BACKGROUND ERC MEETING DATE Project Name Applicant File Number Project Manager Project Description Project Location Exist. Bldg. Area gsf Site Area SITE MAP See below. Project Location Map September 20, 2005 Lindberg Annexation Prezone Don Erickson LUA OS-097, A, RZ, ECF Don Erickson The applicants for the proposed Lindberg Annexation have requested that the City prezone the subject site in advance of annexation, pursuant to RCW 3SA.14.330, so zoning will be in place at the time the subject site comes into the City. The City is proposing to prezone this 9.72 acre proposed annexation area R-8. This corresponds with the Residential Single Family designation in Renton's Comprehensive Plan. Whereas the proposed annexation is considered to be a non-project action under SEPA, the proposed zoning is not. This site is to the east of 138th Ave SE/ Duvall Ave NE, north of 132 nd St SE/ NE 2nd St, south of City limits, and extends approximately 200 ft. east of 140th Ave SE. It is bounded by Renton City limits on three sides and the proposed Mosier II annexation on the fourth side. It is located in the W ~ of Section 1S, Township 23N, Range SE. N/A Proposed New Bldg. Area gsf N/A 9.72 acres Total Building Area gsf N/A ERe Report.doc City of Renton EDNSP Department LINDBERG ANNEXA T/oN PREZONE REPORT AND DECISION OF SEPTEMBER 20, 2005 ERG Report.doc o --Rentoo Cily Urnils -AMexakiJ'l BooOOary _ R-aZool~ .nmental Review Committee Staff Report LUA-05-097 A, RZ, ECF Page20f3 City of Renton EDNSP Department LINDBERG ANNEXATION PREZONE REPORT AND DECISION OF SEPTEMBER 20, 2005 B. RECOMMENDATION .nmentai Review Committee Staff Report LUA-05-097 A, RZ, ECF Page3 of3 Based on analysis of probable impacts from the proposal, staff recommends that the Responsible Officials make the following Environmental Determination: x DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE Issue DNS with 14 day Appeal Period. Issue DNS with 15 day Comment Period with Concurrent 14 day Appeal Period. C. MITIGATION MEASURES None required for this non-project action. D. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS DETERMINATION OF NON -SIGNIFICANCE -MITIGA TED. Issue DNS-M with 15 day Comment Period with Concurrent 14 da A eal Period. Issue DNS-M with 15 day Comment Period followed by a 14 day Appeal Period. In compliance with RCW 43.21 C. 240, the fol/owing non-project environmental review addresses only those impacts that are not adequately addressed under existing development standards and environmental regulations. 1. Transportation Impacts: None identified for this non-project legislative action. At the most likely scenario for build-out 63 potential dwellings could potentially create 630 average vehicle trip ends per week day. There are already 9 dwellings and approximately 90 average vehicle trip ends per week day in the area and development of additional units is likely to occur regardless of the change in zoning. However, mitigation can be provided at the time there are specific project proposals before the City. Mitigation Measures: Impacts, if any, are better assessed at the project level. Nexus: Not applicable. E. COMMENTS OF REVIEWING DEPARTMENTS The proposal has been circulated to City Departmental/Divisional Reviewers for their review. Where applicable, these comments have been incorporated into the text of this report as Mitigation Measures and/or Notes to Applicant. ~ Copies of aI/ Review Comments are contained in the Official File. __ Copies of all Review Comments are attached to this report. Environmental Determination Appeal Process Appeals of the environmental determination must be filed in writing on or before 5:00 PM, October 10, 2005. ERG Report.doc City of Renton EDNSP Department LINDBERG ANNEXATION PREZONE REPORT AND DECISION OF SEPTEMBER 20. 2005 .'nmentai Review Committee Staff Report LUA-05-097 A, RZ, EeF Page4of3 Appeals must be filed in writing together with the required $75.00 application fee with: Hearing Examiner, City of Renton, 1055 South Grady Way, Renton, WA 98055. Appeals to the Examiner are governed by City of Renton Municipal Code Section 4-8-110. Additional information regarding the appeal process may be obtained from the Renton City Clerk's Office, (425)-430-6510. ERG Report.doc • • CITY OF RENTON CURRENT PLANNING DIVISION AFFIDAVIT OF SERVICE BY MAILING On the 29th day of August, 2005, I deposited in the mails of the United States, a sealed envelope containing NOA, Environmental Checklist, PMT documents. This information was sent to: ..... l ",' ill '""'B' dWW,l'l ~ _'k ~ ",,~jl.i%kGc Agencies -Env. Checklist & PMT Surrounding Property Owners -NOA only (Signature of Sender): d4ttf~ 7 STATE OF WASHINGTON ) ) SS COUNTY OF KING ) See Attached See Attached I certify that I know or have satisfactory evidence that Stacy Tucker signed this instrument and acknowledged it to be his/her/their free and voluntary act for the uses and purposes mentioned in the instrument. Dated: 1 -J;; --() '5 Notary (Print): My appointment expires: Lindberg Annexation Prezone " ',' \"~. -,-: . LUA05-097, A, PZ, ECF template -affidavit of service by mailing Dept. of Ecology * Environmental Review Section PO Box 47703 Olympia, WA 98504-7703 WSDOT Northwest Region * Attn: Ramin Pazooki King Area Dev. Serv., MS-240 PO Box 330310 Seattle, WA 98133-9710 US Army Corp. of Engineers * Seattle District Office Attn: SEPA Reviewer PO Box C-3755 Seattle, WA 98124 Jamey Taylor * Depart. of Natural Resources PO Box 47015 Olympia, WA 98504-7015 KC Dev. & Environmental Servo Attn: SEPA Section 900 Oakesdale Ave. SW Renton, WA 98055-1219 Metro Transit Senior Environmental Planner Gary Kriedt AGENCY (DOE) LETTER MAILING (ERe DETERMINATIONS) WDFW -Stewart Reinbold * Muckleshoot Indian Tribe Fisheries Dept. * c/o Department of Ecology Attn: Karen Walter or SEPA Reviewer 3190 160th Ave SE 39015 _172nd Avenue SE Bellevue, WA 98008 Auburn, WA 98092 Duwamish Tribal Office * Muckleshoot Cultural Resources Program * 4717 W Marginal Way SW Attn: Ms Melissa Calvert Seattle, WA 98106-1514 39015 172nd Avenue SE Auburn, WA 98092-9763 KC Wastewater Treatment Division * Office of Archaeology & Historic Environmental Planning Supervisor Preservation* Ms. Shirley Marroquin Attn: Stephanie Kramer 201 S. Jackson ST, MS KSC-NR-050 PO Box 48343 Seattle, WA 98104-3855 Olympia, W A 98504-8343 City of Newcastle City of Kent Attn: Mr. Micheal E. Nicholson Attn: Mr. Fred Satterstrom, AICP Director of Community Development Acting Community Dev. Director 13020 SE 72nd Place 220 Fourth Avenue South Newcastle, WA 98059 Kent, W A 98032-5895 Puget Sound Energy City of Tukwila Municipal Liason Manager Steve Lancaster, Responsible Official Joe Jainga 6300 Southcenter Blvd. 201 South Jackson Street KSC-TR-0431 PO Box 90868, MS: XRD-01W Tukwila, WA 98188 Seattle, WA 98104-3856 Bellevue, WA 98009-0868 Seattle Public Utilities Real Estate Services Title Examiner 700 Fifth Avenue, Suite 4900 PO Box 34018 Seattle, WA 98124-4018 Note: If the Notice of Application states that it is an "Optional DNS", the marked agencies and cities will need to be sent a copy of the checklist, PMT's, and the notice of application. * Also note, do not mail Jamey Taylor any of the notices she gets hers from the web. Only send her the ERC Determination paperwork. template -affidavit of service by mailing 692800007001 ARCHER DOROTHY M I 14117 SE 132ND ST RENTON WA 98059 152305903600 BALES SELF STORAGE POBOX 3015 RENTON WA 98059 692800004008 BEGALKA BRENT E+KAREN L 14023 SE 132ND ST RENTON WA 98059 152305908203-No5\.l.(h ~ qJI/05' BUSCH FREDERICK L & JUDY R 13843 SE 132ND ST RENTON WA 98056 152305901505 CONNER HOMES COMPANY 846 108TH AV NE STE 202 BELLEVUE WA 98004 152305904400 GRAHAM PATRICK HSARAH R 13809 SE 131ST ST RENTON WA 98059 152305903709 HARGRAVES CHARLES 13820 SE 132ND ST RENTON WA 98059 692800002002 JONES DOUGLAS H+SHARON R 14011 SE 132ND ST RENTON WA 98059 152305920505 LINDBERG PAUL A 13836 SE 131ST RENTON WA 98056 152305903204 MR VAN GARD SELF STORAGE C/O MORRIS PIHA REAL ESTATE PO BOX 53290 BELLEVUE WA 98015 692800016002 ARCHER LOLA L 14004 SE 133RD ST RENTON WA 98056 692800013009 BAMFORD ROBERT E+NANCY J 14024 SE 133RD RENTON WA 98056 152305904806 BELTRAN RICARDO Q 2108 BLAINE SE RENTON WA 98055 152305903907 CAMWEST WEST COAST LLC 9720 NE 120TH PL STE100 KIRKLAND WA 98034 692800015004 COOK FRANK J 14012 SE 133RD RENTON WA 98059 152305921909 GREEN NORMAN W & CYNTHIA A 14128 SE 132ND ST RENTON WA 98056 152305903105 HILLCREST SQUARE L L C 10430 RENTON-ISSAQUAH RD SE ISSAQUAH WA 98027 152305922709 KING COUNTY 500 KC ADMIN BLDG 500 4TH AV SEATTLE WA 98104 152305920604 LINDBERG STEPHEN HGENA R 13832 SE 131ST ST RENTON WA 98059 692800014007 RIGOR A B 14018 SE 133RD RENTON WA 98055 152305907502 BABOLDASHTIAN M S 1038 S WALKER AV #1 SAN PEDRO CA 90731 692800003000 BATSON JUANITA M 14017 SE 132ND ST RENTON WA 98059 692800012001 BURNHAM DAVID W 14104 SE 133RD ST RENTON WA 98059 152305917709 CHAUSSEE EDWARD C+CYNTHIA A 20924 284TH AV SE MAPLE VALLEY WA 98059 152305920703 GOERES KARL W JR+CHERI L 13116 138TH AV SE RENTON WA 98059 152305904608 HAMBLIN MARYELLEN + DONALD E 16210 SE 134TH ST RENTON WA 98059 692800006003 HIMES BRUCE W+JEANMARIE 14111 SE 132ND ST RENTON WA 98056 692800001004 LEA IVYL T 7443 NE 123RD PL KIRKLAND WA 98034 152305922303 LINDBERG TIMOTHY HJENNIFER 13845 SE 131ST ST RENTON WA 98059 152305922204 SHEWCHUK BETH 2105 N MARGUERITE SPOKANE VALLEY WA 99212 • . , 152305921701 YAHN CLYDE 14100 SE 132ND RENTON WA 98056 152305921800 SNOW MICHAEL T & JODI E 14114 SE 132ND ST RENTON WA 98059 692800005005 TATMAN JAMIE L+MCGINNIS TOBY R 14103 SE 132ND ST RENTON WA 98059 DATE: Auguat 29, 200& LAND USE NUMBER: LUA-oS-097, A, PZ, ECF APPLICATION NAME: LINDBERG ANNEXATION PREZONE PROJECT DESCRIPTION: The applicants for the proposed Lindberg Annexation have requested that the City prezone the subject site in advance 01 annexation, pursuant to RCW 35A.14.330, so zoning wilt be in place at the time the subject site comes into the City. The City is proposing to prezone this 9.72 acre proposed annexation area A·B. This corresponds with the ReSidential Single Family designation in Renton's Comprehensive Plan. Whereas the proposed annexation is considered to be a non-projeet action under SEPA, the proposed zoning is not. PROJECT LOCATION: This site is to the east of 13Slh Ave 5E1 Duvall Ave NE, north of 132nd 51 SEI NE 2nd 51. south of City limits, and extends approximately 200 ft. east of 140lh Ave SE. It is bounded by Renton City limits on three sides and the proposed Mosier II annexation on the fourth side. It Is located in the W ~ of Section 14, Township 23N, Range 5E. OPTIONAL DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE (DNS): As Iho Lead Agency, tho Clly 01 Ronlon has d.l.rmlned that significant environmental impacts are unlikely to resutt from the proposed zoning. Therefore, as permitted under the RCW 43.21 C.ll0, the City of Renton is using the Optional DNS process to give notice that a ONS is likely to be Issued. Comment periods for the project and the proposed DNS are integrated into a single comment period. There will be no comment period following the issuance of the Threshold Determination of Non-Significance (DNS). A 14-day appeal period will follow the issuance of the DNS. PERMIT APPLICATION DATE: August 16, 2005 NOTICE OF COMPLETE APPLICATION: August 29, 2005 f'ermltalReview Requested: Other Permits which may be required: Requested Studies: Location where application may be reviewed: PUBLIC HEARING: CONSISTENCY OVERVIEW: Land Use: Environmental Oocuments that Evaluate the Proposed f'roJecl: Oevelopment Regulations Used For Project MItigation: Proposed MItigation Measur.s: Environmental (SEPA) Review and Prezone N/A N/A Planning/Building/Public Works Division, Development Services Department, 1055 South Grady Way, Renton, WA 98055 Council accepted the proposed Direct Petition to annex at its public hearing on December 20, 2004 and held the first of two required public hearings on the proposed prezonlng on this same date. The subject site Is located within the Residential Single Family (RS) Comprehensive Plan Land Use Map designation. The proposed A-a prezone is consistent with this land use designation, as weI! as relevant land use policies adopted in November 2004. Environmental Checklist prepared Augusl12, 2005 This non-project action will be subject to the City's SEPA Ordinance and Development Regulations and other applicable codes and regulations as appropriate. The analysis of the proposal does not reveal any adverse environmental impacts requiring mitigation above and beyond existing code provisions. However, mitigation may be necessary and may be imposed at the time of a site-specific development proposal on the subject annexation site. Comments on ~he above application must be submitted in writing to Don Erickson Sentor Planner Economic Development Neighborhoods and Strategic Planning DiviSion, 1055 South Grady Way, Aent~n, WA 98055, by'5:00 PM on Sep:t~mber 1.2. 2~05. If y~u have questions. about this proposal, or wish to be made a party of record and receive additional notification by mall, ~ontact t~e Project Ma~ager. Anyone who submits written comments will automatically become a party of record and will be notified of any decision on this project. CONTACT PERSON: DON ERICKSON (425) 430-6581 PLEASE INCLUDE THE PROJECT NUMBER WHEN CALLING FOR PROPER FILE IDENTIFICATION " DP O [----?-~I ~ Ui V Ii / t9j. [_~D ~ w UJ \ ~ I~ 7 • \ ''". Oo~ c::J ~ .. 025 • I~ "[ f 1 .. • ( 0 <>0 CD n &laI ~ E , ~ • .. '-• 0 ., 1 G, D 0 TI D 0 w D 1"1.,1 b.. 0 ..--J; DB d ~ o c::3 '-' CJ.) o 0 -,..::> « e:, _. c=J Ame:a~oo 8otn::1a')' - -R.nblCtjlm~ o I lcj~! QJ<? C:J 0 D ~~~ y; 'i ~ Z3Tdf-~ ~\i 200 I : 2400 400 I ~ t If you would like to be m~de a party of record to receive further information on this proposed project complete IhIS form and relurn 10: CIIy of Renlon, Developmenl Planning, 1055 Soulh Grady Way, Renlon, WA'98055. File NoJName: LUA-05-o97, A, PZ, ECF ILlndberg Annexation Prezone NAME: ______________________________________________ _ ADDRESS: ______________________________________________ _ TELEPHONE NO.: ________________ _ CERTIFICATION I, ---..I~~~~~~~+-_., hereby certify that <-j copies of the above document were posted by me in conspicuous places or nearby the described property on ---'-"-"'-"'" /~ I ;---~OR/41V' DATE: !fBo105 SIGNED: ~~~""'GOMMi~~1 '-I I c;' ~: 1--0 u··. Y' , , , S fW hi -d-' rtf: "9.' /. -z: t; I A TrEST: Subscribed and sworn before me, a Notary PublIc, m and for the tate 0 as ngton reSl mgm {): Cf 'O:l '\ -; m: >< I I> (Z;,:":;. ~ -<~:.'b" ~)'(f;-trle WA-,onthe /5 day of SepternJgCr ~oC>5 ()fl//UC;f;fV(;....r2~e ('I c::»~ .... 6j NOTARY PUBLIC SIGNATUR~;r,,;·········· ~I»: ., .. o'-?ION _-- , -\." ...... , ... -- City of Renton Department of Planning / Building / Public Works ENVIRONMENTAL & DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: ~p COMMENTS DUE: SEPTEMBER 12, 2005 APPLICATION NO: LUA05-097, A, PZ, ECF DATE CIRCULATED: AUGUST?Q ~ APPLICANT: Citv of Renton PROJECT MANAGER(E?rika Conkling ~ PROJECT TITLE: LindberQ Annexation Prezone PLAN REVIEW: Kayre~;",,, '''~ ' ..... SITE AREA: 9.72 acres BUILDING AREAJ.gros~l: N/A LOCATION: This site is to the east of 138th Ave SEI Duvall Ave NE, WORK ORDER NO: 77464 north of 132nd St SEI NE 2nd St, south of City limits, and extends approximately 200 ft. east of 140th Ave SE. It is bounded by Renton City limits on three sides and the proposed Mosier II annexation on the fourth side. It is located in the W Y2 of Section 14, Township 23N, Range 5E. SUMMARY OF PROPOSAL: The applicants for the proposed Lindberg Annexation have requested that the City prezone the subject site in advance of annexation, pursuant to RCW 35A.14.330, so zoning will be in place at the time the subject site comes into the City. The City is proposing to prezone this 9.72 acre proposed annexation area R-8. This corresponds with the Residential Single Family designation in Renton's Comprehensive Plan. Whereas the proposed annexation is considered to be a non-project action under SEPA, the proposed zoning is not. A. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT (e.g. Non-Code) COMMENTS Element of the Probable Probable More Element of the Probable Probable More Environment Minor Major Information Impacts Impacts Necessary Environment Minor Major Information Impacts Impacts Necessary Earth Housing Air Aesthetics Water Light/Glare Plants Recreation Land/Shoreline Use Utilities Animals Transportation Environmental Health Public Services Energy/ Historic/Cultural Natural Resources Preservation Airport Environment 10,000 Feet 14,000 Feet 8. POLICY-RELATED COMMENTS C. CODE-RELATED COMMENTS We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas in which we have expertise and have identified areas of probable impact or areas w: re additional information is needed to properly assess this proposal. Signature of Director or Authorized Representative Date DATE: TO: FROM: SUBJECT: CITY OF RENTON PLANNING/BUILDING/PUBLIC WORKS MEMORANDUM September 8, 2005 Erika Conkling Sonja J. Fessery~ Lindberg Annexation Prezone Format and Legal Description Review I have reviewed the above referenced annexation prezone review submittal and have the following comments: The Land Use Permit Master Application, under the "PROJECT/ADDRESS(S)ILOCATION AND ZIP CODE" block and the "LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF PROPERTY" block, incorrectly notes the "Section" as "14". The section is actually 15. The review package includes a "Vicinity Map" that is for the annexation, not the prezone. The prezone vicinity map should not highlight (or shade) the public streets shown on the annexation map. Attached is the legal description needed for the subject prezone action. If you have questions, my Extension is 7312. \H:\File Sys\LND -Land Subdivision & Surveying Records\LND-20 -Short Plats\UNDBERGa.doc City of Renton Department of Planning / Building / Public Works ENVIRONMENTAL & DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: Pc UJer-h.l Sr~ COMMENTS DUE: SEPTEMBER 12, 2005 APPLICATION NO: LUA05-097, A, Pl, Ed DATE CIRCULATED: AUGUST 29,2005 APPLICANT: City of Renton PROJECT MANAGER: Erika Conkling r?ECt=IVJ:n PROJECT TITLE: Lindberg Annexation Prezone PLAN REVIEW: Kayren Kittrick SITE AREA: 9.72 acres BUILDING AREA (gross): N/A LOCATION: This site is to the east of 138th Ave SEI Duvall Ave NE, WORK ORDER NO: 77464 north of 132nd St SEI NE 2nd St, south of City limits, and extends approximately 200 ft. east of 140th Ave SE. It is bounded by Renton City limits on three sides and the proposed Mosier II annexation on the fourth side. It is located in the W Yo of Section 14, Township 23N, Range 5E. -- f-IUll l 9 L005 SUMMARY OF PROPOSAL: The applicants for the proposed Lindberg Annexation have requested that the City prezone the subject site in advance of annexation, pursuant to RCW 35A.14.330, so zoning will be in place at the time the subject site comes into the City. The City is proposing to prezone this 9.72 acre proposed annexation area R-8. This corresponds with the Residential Single Family designation in Renton's Comprehensive Plan. Whereas the proposed annexation is considered to be a non-project action under SEPA, the proposed zoning is not. A. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT (e.g. Non-Code) COMMENTS Element of the Probable Probable More Element of the Probable Probable More Environment Minor Major Information Impacts Impacts Necessary Environment Minor Major Information Impacts Impacts Necessary Earth Housing Air Aesthetics Water Light/Glare Plants Recreation Land/Shoreline Use Utilities Animals Transportation Environmental Health Public SetVices Energy! Historic/Cultural Natural Resources Preservation Airport Environment 10.000 Feet 14.000 Feet B. POLICY-RELA TED COMMENTS C. CODE-RELATED COMMENTS We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas in which we have expertise and have identified areas of probable impact or areas where additional information is needed to properly assess this proposal. Signature of Director or Authorized Representative Date City of Renton Department of Planning / Building / Public Works ENVIRONMENTAL & DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: fttrlLs. COMMENTS DUE: SEPTEMBER 12, 2005 APPLICATION NO: LUA05-097, A, Pl, ECF DATE CIRCULATED: AUGUST 29,2005 APPLICANT: City of Renton PROJECT MANAGER: Erika Conkling PROJECT TITLE: Lindberg Annexation Prezone PLAN REVIEW: Kayren Kittrick SITE AREA: 9.72 acres BUILDING AREA (gross): N/A LOCATION: This site is to the east of 138th Ave SE/ Duvall Ave NE, WORK ORDER NO: 77464 north of 132nd St SE/ NE 2nd St, south of City limits, and extends approximately 200 ft. east of 140th Ave SE. It is bounded by Renton City limits on three sides and the proposed Mosier II annexation on the fourth side. It is located in the W Jt2 of Section 14, Township 23N, Range 5E. SUMMARY OF PROPOSAL: The applicants for the proposed Lindberg Annexation have requested that the City prezone the subject site in advance of annexation, pursuant to RCW 35A.14.330, so zoning will be in place at the time the subject site comes into the City. The City is proposing to prezone this 9.72 acre proposed annexation area R-8. This corresponds with the Residential Single Family designation in Renton's Comprehensive Plan. Whereas the proposed annexation is considered to be a non-project action under SEPA, the proposed zoning is not. A. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT (e.g. Non-Code) COMMENTS Element of the Probable Probable More Element of the Probable Probable More Environment Minor Major Information Impacts Impacts Necessary Environment Minor Major Information Impacts Impacts Necessary Earth Housina Air Aesthetics Water Light/Glare Plants Recreation Land/Shoreline Use Utilities Animals Transportation Environmental Health Public Services Energy/ Historic/Cultural Natural Resources Preservation Airport Environment 10,000 Feet 14,000 Feet (7~ 10 &10 /(ytf( IJI ~ ax:J ()CC~ B. POLICY-RELATED COMMENTS C. We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas in which we have expertise and have identified areas of probable impact or areas where additional informatio' ed to properly assess this proposal. ~~~~~~~--o"e2r/~II()'S City of Renton Department of Planning I Building I Public Works ENVIRONMENTAL & DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: Plan Re-» If> J.0 COMMENTS DUE: SEPTEMBER 12, 2005 APPLICATION NO: LUA05-097, A, PZ, ECF DATE CIRCULATED: AUGUST 29,2005 APPLICANT: City of Renton PROJECT MANAGER: Erika Conkling PROJECT TITLE: Lindberg Annexation Prezone PLAN REVIEW: Kayren Kittrick SITE AREA: 9.72 acres BUILDING AREA Jgross): NlA LOCATION: This site is to the east of 138th Ave SE/ Duvall Ave NE, WORK ORDER NO: 77464 north of 132nd St SE/ NE 2nd St, south of City limits, and extends approximately 200 ft. east of 140th Ave SE. It is bounded by Renton City limits on three sides and the proposed Mosier II annexation on the fourth side. It is located in the W Yo of Section 14, Township 23N, Range SE. SUMMARY OF PROPOSAL: The applicants for the proposed Lindberg Annexation have requested that the City prezone the subject site in advance of annexation, pursuant to RCW 35A.14.330, so zoning will be in place at the time the subject site comes into the City. The City is proposing to prezone this 9.72 acre proposed annexation area R-B. This corresponds with the Residential Single Family designation in Renton's Comprehensive Plan. Whereas the proposed annexation is considered to be a non-project action under SEPA, the proposed zoning is not. A. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT (e.g. Non-Code) COMMENTS Element of the Probable Probable More Element of the Probable Probable More Environment Minor Major Information Impacts Impacts Necessary Environment Minor Major Information Impacts Impacts Necessary Earth Housing Air Aesthetics Water UghtlGlare Plants Recreation Land/Shoreline Use Utilities Animals Transoortation Environmental Health Public SeN/ces Energy! Historic/Cultural Natural Resources Preservation Airport Environment 10,000 Feet 14,000 Feet B. POLICY-RELATED COMMENTS f\J <r-J...--" C. CODE-RELATED COMMENTS I) "-'\::..~ We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas in which we have expertise and have identified areas of probable impact or areas where additional information is needed to properly assess this proposal. City of Renton Department of Planning / Building / Public Works ENVIRONMENTAL & DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: Sur-~J lAYL94etI.Y];~ COMMENTS DUE: SEPTEMBER 12, 2005 APPLICATION NO: LUA05-097, A, Pl, ECF' DATE CIRCULATED: AUGUST 29,2005 APPLICANT: City of Renton PROJECT MANAGER: Erika ConklinQ PROJECT TITLE: Lindberg Annexation Prezone PLAN REVIEW: Kayren Kittrick SITE AREA: 9.72 acres BUILDING AREA (gross): N/A LOCATION: This site is to the east of 138th Ave SEI Duvall Ave NE, WORK ORDER NO: 77464 north of 132nd St SEI NE 2nd St, south of City limits, and extends approximately 200 ft. east of 140th Ave SE. It is bounded by Renton City limits on three sides and the proposed Mosier II annexation on the fourth side. It is located in the W % of Section 14, Township 23N, Range 5E. SUMMARY OF PROPOSAL: The applicants for the proposed Lindberg Annexation have requested that the City prezone the subject site in advance of annexation, pursuant to RCW 35A.14.330, so zoning will be in place at the time the subject site comes into the City. The City is proposing to prezone this 9.72 acre proposed annexation area R-S. This corresponds with the Residential Single Family designation in Renton's Comprehensive Plan. Whereas the proposed annexation is considered to be a non-project action under SEPA, the proposed zoning is not. A. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT (e.g. Non-Code) COMMENTS Element of the Probable Probable More Element of the Probable Probable More Environment Minor Major Information Impacts Impacts Necessary Environment Minor Major Information Impacts Impacts Necessary Earth Housina Air Aesthetics Water Light/Glare Plants Recreation Land/Shoreline Use Utilities Animals Transportation Environmental Health Public Services Energy/ Historic/Cultural Natural Resources Preservation Airport Environment 10,000 Feet 14,000 Feet B. POLICY-RELATED COMMENTS U(N--f C. CODE-RELATED COMMENTS 1\J:,-'\i\.~ We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas in which we have expertise and have identified areas of probable impact or areas where additional information is needed to properly assess this proposal. c1 (J Date City of Renton Department of Planning / Building / Public Works ENVIRONMENTAL & DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: fire... APPLICATION NO: LUA05-097, A, PZ, ECF APPLICANT: City of Renton PROJECT TITLE: Lindberg Annexation Prezone SITE AREA: 9.72 acres LOCATION: This site is to the east of 138th Ave SEI Duvall Ave NE, north of 132nd St SEI NE 2nd St, south of City limits, and extends approximately 200 ft. east of 140th Ave SE. It is bounded by Renton City limits on three sides and the proposed Mosier II annexation on the fourth side. It is located in the W Y. of Section 14, Township 23N, Range SE. COMMENTS DUE: SEPTEMBER 12, 2005 DATE CIRCULATED: AUGUS~ 2005_._ .. _ . _. __ . PROJECT MANAGER: E~ka Conklin~.' l, PLAN REVIEW: Kayren Klttrick r-'---.. "'-"'---' -, I j'l '. t i BUILDING AREA (gross): N/A i AUG 2 9 iOOI) '!'. , WORK ORDER NO: 7741 rlT V c>r RUn: j.-J L r __ ._l._~/:·~. ___ .. ___ _ SUMMARY OF PROPOSAL: The applicants for the proposed Lindberg Annexation have requested that the City prezone the subject site in advance of annexation, pursuant to RCW 35A.14.330, so zoning will be in place at the time the subject site comes into the City. The City is proposing to prezone this 9.72 acre proposed annexation area R-8. This corresponds with the Residential Single Family designation in Renton's Comprehensive Plan. Whereas the proposed annexation is considered to be a non-project action under SEPA, the proposed zoning is not. A. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT (e.g. Non-Code) COMMENTS Element of the Probable Probable More Element of the Probable Probable More Environment Minor Major Information Impacts Impacts Necessary Environment Minor Major Information Impacts Impacts Necessary Earth Housino Air Aesthetics Water Light/Glare Plants Recreation Land/Shoreline Use Utilities Animals Transportation Environmental Health Public Services Energy/ Historic/Cultural Natural Resources Preservation Airport Environment 10,000 Feet 14,000 Feet B. POLICY-RELATED COMMENTS C. CODE-RELATED COMMENTS AJ~ ~~ with particular attention to those areas in which we have expertise and is needed to properly assess this proposal. Date City of Renton Department of Planning / Building / Public Works ENVIRONMENTAL & DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: 1Wf'6lX)(.k-trefl COMMENTS DUE: SEPTEMBER 12, 2005 , APPLICATION NO: LUA05-097, A, PZ, ECF DATE CIRCULATED: AUGUST 29, 2005 APPLICANT: City of Renton PROJECT MANAGER: Erika Conkling PROJECT TITLE: Lindberg Annexation Prezone PLAN REVIEW: Kayren Kittrick SITE AREA: 9.72 acres BUILDING AREA (gross): N/A LOCATION: This site is to the east of 138th Ave SEI Duvall Ave NE, WORK ORDER NO: 77464 north of 132nd St SEI NE 2nd St, south of City limits, and extends approximately 200 ft. east of 140th Ave SE. It is bounded by Renton City limits on three sides and the proposed Mosier II annexation on the fourth side. It is located in the W Y. of Section 14, Township 23N, Range 5E. SUMMARY OF PROPOSAL: The applicants for the proposed Lindberg Annexation have requested that the City prezone the subject site in advance of annexation, pursuant to RCW 35A.14.330, so zoning will be in place at the time the subject site comes into the City. The City is proposing to prezone this 9.72 acre proposed annexation area R-8. This corresponds with the Residential Single Family designation in Renton's Comprehensive Plan. Whereas the proposed annexation is considered to be a non-project action under SEP A, the proposed zoning is not. A. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT (e.g. Non-Code) COMMENTS Element of the Probable Probable Environment Minor Major Impacts Impacts Earth Air Water Plants Land/Shoreline Use Animals Environmental Health Energy/ Natural Resources B. POLICY-RELATED COMMENTS I0cv-....t C. CODE-RELATED COMMENTS fJ(yv\....< More Information Necessary Element of the Probable Probable More Environment Minor Major Information Impacts Impacts Necessary Housing Aesthetics Light/Glare Recreation Utilities Transportation Public Services Historic/Cultural PreseNation Airport Environment 10,()()O Feet 14,()()OFeet We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas in which we have expertise and have identified areas of probable impact or areas where additional information is needed to properly assess this proposal. / .£ f 8i dr:ir- Dae7 / City of Re .. __ n Department of Planning / Building / Public .. _ ... s ENVIRONMENTAL & DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: ~llL~hen COMMENTS DUE: SEPTEMBER 12,2005 APPLICATION NO: LUA05-097, A, PZ, ECF DATE CIRCULATED: AUGUST 29,2005 APPLICANT: City of Renton PROJECT MANAGER: Erika ConklinQ PROJECT TITLE: Lindberg Annexation Prezone PLAN REVIEW: Kayren Kittrick SITE AREA: 9.72 acres BUILDING AREA (gross): N/A LOCATION: This site is to the east of 138th Ave SEI Duvall Ave NE, WORK ORDER NO: 77464 north of 132nd St SEI NE 2nd St, south of City limits, and extends approximately 200 ft. east of 140th Ave SE. It is bounded by Renton City limits on three sides and the proposed Mosier II annexation on the fourth side. It is located in the W % of Section 14, Township 23N, Range 5E. SUMMARY OF PROPOSAL: The applicants for the proposed Lindberg Annexation have requested that the City prezone the subject site in advance of annexation, pursuant to RCW 35A.14.330, so zoning will be in place at the time the subject site comes into the City. The City is proposing to prezone this 9.72 acre proposed annexation area R-8. This corresponds with the Residential Single Family designation in Renton's Comprehensive Plan. Whereas the proposed annexation is considered to be a non-project action under SEPA, the proposed zoning is not. A. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT (e.g. Non-Code) COMMENTS Element of the Probable Probable More Element of the Probable Probable More Environment Minor Major Information Environment Minor Major Information Impacts Impacts Necessary Impacts Impacts Necessary Earth Housing Air Aesthetics Water Licht/Glare Plants Recreation Land/Shoreline Use Utilities Animals Transportation Environmental Health Public Services Energy/ Historic/Cultural Natural Resources Preservation Airport Environment 10,000 Feet 14,000 Feet B. POLICY-RELATED COMMENTS C. CODE-RELATED COMMENTS We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas in which we have expertise and have identified areas of probable impact or areas whe additional information is needed to properly assess this proposal. Date NOTICE OF APPLICATION AND PROPOSED DETERMINATION OF NON- SIGNIFICANCE (DNS) DATE: August 29, 2005 LAND USE NUMBER: LUA-05-097, A, PZ, ECF APPLICATION NAME: LINDBERG ANNEXATION PREZONE PROJECT DESCRIPTION: The applicants for the proposed Lindberg Annexation have requested that the City prezone the subject site in advance of annexation, pursuant to RCW 35A.14.330, so zoning will be in place at the time the subject site comes into the City. The City is proposing to prezone this 9.72 acre proposed annexation area R-8. This corresponds with the Residential Single Family designation in Renton's Comprehensive Plan. Whereas the proposed annexation is considered to be a non-project action under SEPA, the proposed zoning is not. PROJECT LOCATION: This site is to the east of 138th Ave SE/ Duvall Ave NE, north of 132nd St SE/ NE 2nd St, south of City limits, and extends approximately 200 ft. east of 140th Ave SE. It is bounded by Renton City limits on three sides and the proposed Mosier II annexation on the fourth side. It is located in the W Y2 of Section 14, Township 23N, Range 5E. OPTIONAL DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE (DNS): As the Lead Agency, the City of Renton has determined that significant environmental impacts are unlikely to result from the proposed zoning. Therefore, as permitted under the RCW 43.21 C.11 0, the City of Renton is using the Optional DNS process to give notice that a DNS is likely to be issued. Comment periods for the project and the proposed DNS are integrated into a single comment period. There will be no comment period following the issuance of the Threshold Determination of Non-Significance (DNS). A 14-day appeal period will follow the issuance of the DNS. PERMIT APPLICATION DATE: August 16,2005 NOTICE OF COMPLETE APPLICATION: August 29, 2005 Permits/Review Requested: Other Permits which may be required: Requested Studies: Location where application may be reviewed: PUBLIC HEARING: CONSISTENCY OVERVIEW: Land Use: Environmental Documents that Evaluate the Proposed Project: Development Regulations Used For Project MItigation: Proposed MItigation Measures: Environmental (SEPA) Review and Prezone N/A N/A Planning/Building/Public Works Division, Development Services Department, 1055 South Grady Way, Renton, WA 98055 Council accepted the proposed Direct Petition to annex at its public hearing on December 20, 2004 and held the first of two required public hearings on the proposed prezoning on this same date. The subject site is located within the Residential Single Family (RS) Comprehensive Plan Land Use Map designation. The proposed R-8 prezone is consistent with this land use designation, as well as relevant land use policies adopted in November 2004. Environmental Checklist prepared August 12, 2005 This non-project action will be subject to the City's SEPA Ordinance and Development Regulations and other applicable codes and regulations as appropriate. The analysis of the proposal does not reveal any adverse environmental impacts requiring mitigation above and beyond existing code provisions. However, mitigation may be necessary and may be imposed at the time of a site-specific development proposal on the subject annexation site. Comments on the above application must submitted in writing to Don Erickson, Senior lr, Economic Development Neighborhoods and Strategic Planning Division, 1055 South Grady Way, Renton, WA 98000, by 5:00 PM on September 12, 2005. If you have questions about this proposal, or wish to be made a party of record and receive additional notification by mail, contact the Project Manager. Anyone who submits written comments will automatically become a party of record and will be notified of any decision on this project. CONTACT PERSON: DON ERICKSON (425) 430-6581 I PLEASE INCLUDE THE PROJECT NUMBER WHEN CALLING FOR PROPER FILE IDENTIFICATION I o [] D 0 c:::3 o 0 ¢ <C Lindberg Annexation Figure 4: SlJ'Ucture map ~ SlruclUI9 c:::J Annexation Boundary - -RenlOll CJIy LimJts o 200 400 1: 2400 If you would like to be made a party of record to receive further information on this proposed project, complete this form and return to: City of Renton, Development Planning, 1055 South Grady Way, Renton, WA 98055. File No./Name: LUA-05-097, A, PZ, ECF ILindberg Annexation Prezone NAME: ADDRESS: ________________________________________________ ___ TELEPHONE NO.: ____________ _ Date: To: From: CITY OF RENTON MEMORANDUM August 29, 2005 File Development Planning Department Subject: Prezone of Lindberg Annexation Area LUA05-097, PZ, ECF The Development Planning Section of the City of Renton has determined that the subject application is complete according to submittal requirements and, therefore, is accepted for review. It is tentatively scheduled for consideration by the Environmental Review Committee on September 20,2005. Prior to that review, you will be notified if any additional information is required to continue processing your application. Acceptance Memo 05-097.doc City of Renton LAN,D USE PERMIT MASTER APPLICATION PROPERTY OWNER(S) PROJECT INFORMATION NAME: CITY OF RENTON PROJECT OR DEVELOPMENT NAME: Prezoning of the proposed Lindberg Annexation. ADDRESS: 1055 S. Grady Way PROJECT/ADDRESS(S)/LOCATION AND ZIP CODE: W 1/2 of Section 14, Township 23 N, Range 5E. East of 13dh Ave CITY: Renton ZIP: 98055 SEiDuvall Avenue, South of Renton City Limits, East of 200 ft. east of 14dh Ave SE, North of SE 132"d StiNE Z'd St. TELEPHONE NUMBER: 425-430-6581 KING COU~ ASrtc/JljS A~UNT J:lUMB~(S):.1 1523t!f.9-~06, J/c 03, 1 09, 2 703, 04400, 03709, 22709, 205 ~ 2004,2 03,2204 APPLICANT (if other than owner) NAME: Don Erickson EXISTING LAND USE(S):9 single-family units. COMPANY (if applicable): EDNSP Department PROPOSED LAND USE(S): Single family detached housing at densities of four units per net acre. ADDRESS: 1055 S. Grady Way EXISTING COMPREHENSIVE PLAN MAP DESIGNATION: (RS) Residential Single Family in Renton's Comprehensive Plan CITY: Renton ZIP: 98055 PROPOSED COMPREHENSIVE PLAN MAP DESIGNATION TELEPHONE NUMBER 425-430-6581 (if applicable): RS CONTACT PERSON EXISTING ZONING: King County R-4; 4 units per gross acre PROPOSED ZONING (if applicable): Renton R-B, B units per NAME: net acre. SITE AREA (in square feet): 423,403 ff (9.72 acres) COMPANY (if applicable): SQUARE FOOTAGE OF ROADWAYS TO BE DEDICATED FOR SUBDIVISIONS OR PRIVATE STREETS SERVING ADDRESS: THREE LOTS OR MORE (if applicable): n/a PROPOSED RESIDENTIAL DENSITY IN UNITS PER NET CITY: ZIP: ACRE (if applicable): Eight DU/ net acre NUMBER OF PROPOSED LOTS (if applicable): n/a TELEPHONE NUMBER AND E-MAIL ADDRESS: NUMBER OF NEW DWELLING UNITS (if applicable): nla Q:web/pw/devserv/forms/pJanningimasterapp.doc 07125/05 PRO CT INFORMA TION (contini ) NUMBER OF EXISTING DWELLING UNITS (if applicable): nla PROJECT VALUE: nla SQUARE FOOTAGE OF PROPOSED RESIDENTIAL IS THE SITE LOCATED IN ANY TYPE OF BUILDINGS (if applicable): nla ENVIRONMENTALLY CRITICAL AREA, PLEASE INCLUDE SQUARE FOOTAGE OF EXISTING RESIDENTIAL SQUARE FOOTAGE (if applicable): BUILDINGS TO REMAIN (if applicable): nla SQUARE FOOTAGE OF PROPOSED NON-RESIDENTIAL o AQUIFER PROTECTION AREA ONE BUILDINGS (if applicable): nla o AQUIFER PROTECTION AREA TWO SQUARE FOOTAGE OF EXISTING NON-RESIDENTIAL BUILDINGS TO REMAIN (if applicable): nla o FLOOD HAZARD AREA sq. ft. NET FLOOR AREA OF NON-RESIDENTIAL BUILDINGS (if o GEOLOGIC HAZARD sq. ft. applicable): nla o HABITAT CONSERVATION sq. ft. NUMBER OF EMPLOYEES TO BE EMPLOYED BY THE NEW PROJECT (if applicable): nla o SHORELINE STREAMS AND LAKES sq. ft. o WETLANDS appx. 108,900 sq. ft. LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF PROPERTY (Attach legal description on separate sheet with the following information included) SITUATE IN THE W112 OF SECTION 14 ,TOWNSHIP 23N ,RANGE 5E ,IN KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON. TYPE OF APPLICATION & FEES List all land use applications being applied for: 1. Rezone 3. 2. Environmental Checklist 4. Staff will calculate applicable fees and postage: $ AFFIDAVIT OF OWNERSHIP I, (Print Name/s) Rebecca Lind , declare that I am (please check one) _ the current owner of the property involved in this application or _X_ the authorized representative to act for a corporation (please attach proof of authorization) and that the foregoing statements and answers herein contained and the information herewith are in all respects true and correct to the best of my knowledge and belief. Rebecca Lind (Signature of Owner/Representative) (Signature of Owner/Representative) Q:web/pw/devserv/fonns/p\anning/masterapp.doc I certify that I know or have satisfactory evidence that ~-:--:--:-----:---:--:----:-::-""7." signed this instrument and acknowledged it to be his/her/their free and voluntary act for the uses and purposes mentioned in the instrument. 07125/05 Lindberg Annexation Figure 1: Vicinity Map e Economic Development, Neighborhoods & Stnltegic Planning +.. + Alex Pietsch, Administrator ~ G. Del Rosario 1: 17 November 2004 w St 600 1200 o F' ""'oot;oo;ooo;l m " , "0 m"~ _ -Renton City Umits c:::J Annexation Boundary 1 : 7200 LINDBERG ANNEXATION PREZONE PROJECT NARRATIVE AND PROPOSAL SUMMARY The applicants for the proposed Lindberg Annexation have requested that the City prezone the subject site in advance of annexation, pursuant to RCW 35A.14.330, so zoning will be in place at the time the subject site comes into the City. This site is adjacent to City Limits on three sides and adjacent to the proposed Mosier II annexation proposal on the fourth side. It is bordered by 138 th Ave SElDuvall Ave NE on the west, on the South by 132nd St SE/ NE 2nd St, on the east the boundary ends approximately 200 ft. east of 140th Ave SE, and on the north the boundary ends at City Limits. Annexation is considered exempt from SEP A. However, the prezoning of the subject 9.72-acre area does require SEPA review. The City is proposing to prezone the proposed annexation area R-8. This corresponds with the Residential Single Family designation in Renton's Comprehensive Plan. The proposed prezone is considered a non-project action under SEP A. Surrounding zoning to the north is Renton Commercial Arterial (CA) and to the east and west of the site is Renton R-8 residential 8 units per net acre, and King County R-4, residential 4 units per gross acre to the east. Currently 9 single-family housing units exist in this area. At full build out it is estimated there will be 63 homes. Since this prezone is a non-project proposal, development of additional housing units will be subject to additional project specific review at the time of development. Lindberg Annexation Prezone Justification The area proposed for prezoning has already been designated for Residential Single Family in the Renton Comprehensive Plan. King County's Comprehensive Plan has designated the area for urban development at a density of 4-12 dwelling units per gross acre. R-8 zoning of this property would be consistent with both Comprehensive Plans. Renton's zoning uses net developable area to determine project density, not gross developable area. This results in less intensive development adjacent to sensitive areas. With current bonuses and incentives, King County zoning at 4 units per gross acre can easily be increased to over 6 units per acre. This is comparable to Renton's proposed zoning of 8 units per acre. DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DIVISION ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST City of Renton Development Services Division 1055 South Grady Way, Renton, WA 98055 Phone: 425-430-7200 Fax: 425-430-7231 PURPOSE OF CHECKLIST: The State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA), Chapter 43.21C RCW, requires all governmental agencies to consider the environmental impacts of a proposal before making decisions. An Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) must be prepared for all proposals with probable significant adverse impacts on the quality of the environment. The purpose of this checklist is to provide information to help you and the agency identify impacts from your proposal (and to reduce or avoid impacts from the proposal, if it can be done) and to help the agency decide whether an EIS is required. INSTRUCTIONS FOR APPLICANTS: This environmental checklist asks you to describe some basic information about your proposal. Governmental agencies use this checklist to determine whether the environmental impacts of your proposal are Significant, requiring preparation of an EIS. Answer the questions briefly, with the most precise information known, or give the best description you can. You must answer each question accurately and carefully, to the best of your knowledge. In most cases, you should be able to answer the questions from your own observations or project plans without the need to hire experts. If you really do not know the answer, or if a question does not apply to your proposal, write "do not know" or "does not apply". Complete answers to the questions now may avoid unnecessary delays later. Some questions ask about governmental regulations, such as zoning, shoreline, and landmark designations. Answer these questions if you can. If you have problems, the governmental agencies can assist you. The checklist questions apply to all parts of your proposal, even if you plan to do them over a period of time or on different parcels of land. Attach any additional information that will help describe your proposal or its environmental effects. The agency to which you submit this checklist may ask you to explain your answers or provide additional information reasonably related to determining if there may be Significant adverse impact. USE OF CHECKLIST FOR NONPROJECT PROPOSALS: Complete this checklist for non project proposals, even though questions may be answered "does not apply." IN ADDITION, complete the SUPPLEMENTAL SHEET FOR NONPROJECT ACTIONS (part D). For nonproject actions (actions involving decisions on policies, plans and programs), the references in the checklist to the words "project," "applicant," and "property or site" should be read as "proposal," "proposer," and "affected geographic area," respectively. H:\EDNSP\PAA\Annexations\Lindberg\SEPA Checklist.doc A. BACKGROUND 1. Name of proposed project, if applicable: Lindberg Annexation prezone. R-8 prezoning of approximately 9 .. 72 acres. 2. Name of applicant: City of Renton 3. Address and phone number of applicant and contact person: Economic Development Neighborhoods and Strategic Planning Renton City Hall, (fh Floor 1055 South Grad Way Renton, WA 98055 Contact: Don Erickson, Senior Planner Phone: (425) 430-6581 4. Date checklist prepared: July 25, 2005 5. Agency requesting checklist: City of Renton 6. Proposed timing or schedule (including phasing, if applicable): Nla non-project action 7. Do you have any plans for future additions, expansion, or further activity related to or connected with this proposal? If yes, explain. Nla non-project action 8. List any environmental information you know about that has been prepared, or will be prepared, directly related to this proposal. Nla non-project action 9. Do you know whether applications are pending for governmental approvals of other proposals directly affecting the property covered by your proposal? If yes, explain. No. 10. List any governmental approvals or permits that will be needed for your proposal, if known. H:\EDNSP\P AA \Annexations\Lindberg\SEPA Checklist.doc 2 .. City Council must give approval of the annexation and zoning. 11. Give brief, complete description of your proposal, including the proposed uses and the size of the project and site. This non-project action includes pre-zoning approximately 9.72 acres to R-8 in Renton's Potential Annexation Area currently being considered for annexation using the 60% Direct Petition method. Under RCW 43.21.C.222 annexations are specifically exempted from SEPA. RCW 3S.A.14.330- 340 provides for rezoning potential annexation areas. 12. Location of the proposal. Give sufficient information for a person to understand the precise location of your proposed project, including a street address, if any, and section, township, and range if known. If a proposal would occur over a range of area, provide the range or boundaries of the site(s}. Provide a legal description, site plan, vicinity map, and topographic map, if reasonably available. While you should submit any plans required by the agency, you are not required to duplicate maps or detailed plans submitted with any permit applications related to this checklist. W 112 of Section 14, Township 23 N, Range SE. This site abuts Renton City Limits on three sides. It is bordered on the west by 13Sh Ave SEiDuvall Avenue NE and on the South by SE 13:f1d STI NE :f1d St. The eastern boundary lies approximately 200 ft. east of 14dh Ave SE and the northern boundary is Renton City limits. Beyond the eastern boundary is the proposed Mosier /I Annexation. B. ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS 1. EARTH a. General description of the site (circle one); flat, rolling, hilly, steep slopes, mountainous, other _____ _ This site is relatively flat with a gentle downward slope from the middle of the area toward the eastern boundary. b. What is the steepest slope on the site (approximate percent slope?) Approximately 1.S%. c. What general types of soils are found on the site (for example, clay, sand, gravel, peat, muck)? If you know the classification of agricultural soils, specify them and note any prime farmland. Nla non-project action d. Are there surface indications or history of unstable soils in the immediate vicinity? If so, describe. nla H:\EDNSP\P AA \Annexations\Lindberg\SEPA Checklist.doc 3 e. Describe the purpose, type, and approximate quantities of any filling or grading proposed. Indicate source of fill. Nla non-project action f. Could erosion occur as a result of clearing, construction, or use? If so, generally describe. Nla non-project action g. About what percent of the site will be covered with impervious surfaces after project construction (for example, asphalt or buildings)? Nla non-project action h. Proposed measures to reduce or control erosion, or other impacts to the earth, if any: Nla non-project action 2. AIR a. What types of emissions to the air would result from the proposal (Le., dust, automobile, odors, industrial wood smoke) during construction and when the project is completed? If any, generally describe and give approximate quantities if known. Nla non-project action b. Are there any off-site sources of emission or odor that may affect your proposal? If so, generally describe. Nla non-project action c. Proposed measures to reduce or control emissions or other impacts to air, if any: Nla non-project action 3. WATER a. Surface Water: 1) Is there any surface water body on or in the immediate vicinity of the site (including year- round and seasonal streams, saltwater, lakes, ponds, wetlands)? If yes, describe type and provide names. If appropriate, state what stream or river it flows into. No stream in the immediate area-there is a stream more than 250 ft. to the east of the boundary of the annexation. There is a portion of an 11 acre wetland, classified as class 2 by King County, in the northern portion of the annexation area-approximately 2.5 acres. H:\EDNSP\P AA \Annexations\Lindberg\SEPA Checklist.doc 4 2) Will the project require any work over, in, or adjacent to (within 200 feet) the described waters? If yes, please describe and attach available plans. N/a non-project action. Any project specific work over, in, or adjacent to the wetland will be subject to environmental review and Critical Areas regulations at that time. 3) Estimate the amount of fill and dredge material that would be placed in or removed from surface water or wetlands and indicate the area of the site that would be affected. Indicate the source of fill material. N/a non-project action 4) Will the proposal require surface water withdrawals or diversions? Give general description, purpose, and approximate quantities if known. N/a non-project action 5) Does the proposal lie within a 1 OO-year flood plain? If 50, note location on the site plan. No. 6) Does the proposal involve any discharges of waste materials to surface waters? If 50, describe the type of waste and anticipated volume of disc!1arge. N/a non-project action b. Ground Water: 1) Will ground water be withdrawn, or will water be discharged to ground water? Give general description, purpose, and approximate quantities if known. N/a non-project action 2) Describe waste material that will be discharged into the ground from septic tanks or other sources, if any (for example: Domestic sewage; industrial, containing the following chemicals ... ; agricultural; etc.). Describe the general size of the system, the number of such systems, the number of houses to be served (if applicable), or the number of animals or humans the system(s) are expected to serve. N/a non-project action c. Water Runoff (including storm water): 1) Describe the source of runoff (including storm water) and method of collection and disposal, if any (include quantities, if known). Where will this water flow? Will this water flow into other waters, If 50, describe. N/a non-project action H:\EDNSP\P AA \Annexations\Lindberg\SEPA Checklist.doc 5 2) Could waste material enter ground or surface waters? If so, generally describe. N/a non-project action d. Proposed measures to reduce or control surface, ground, and runoff water impacts, if any: Nla non-project action 4. PLANTS a. Check or circle types of vegetation found on the site: ~ deciduous tree: alder, maple, aspen, other ~ evergreen tree: fir, cedar, pine, other ~ shrubs ~ grass __ pasture __ crop or grain ~ wet soil plants: cattail, buttercup, bullrush, skunk cabbage, other __ water plants: water lily, eel grass, milfoil, other __ other types of vegetation b. What kind and amount of vegetation will be removed or altered? N/a non-project action c. List threatened or endangered species known to be on or near the site. None. d. Proposed landscaping, use of native plants, or other measures to preserve or enhance vegetation on the site, if any: N/a non-project action 5. ANIMALS a. Circle any birds and animals which have been observed on or near the site or are known to be on or near the site: b. List any threatened or endangered species known to be on or near the site. None. c. Is the site part of a migration route? If so, explain H:\EDNSP\P AA \Annexations\Lindberg\SEPA Checklist.doc 6 No. d. Proposed measures to preserve or enhance wildlife, if any: N/a non-project action 6. ENERGY AND NATURAL RESOURCES a. What kinds of energy (electric, natural gas, oil, wood stove, solar) will be used to meet the completed project's energy needs? Describe whether it will be used for heating, manufacturing, etc. N/a non-project action b. Would your project affect the potential use of solar energy by adjacent properties? If so, generally describe. N/a non-project action c. What kinds of energy conservation features are included in the plans of this proposal? List other proposed measures to reduce or control energy impacts, if any: N/a non-project action 7. ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH a. Are there any environmental health hazards, including exposure to toxic chemicals, risk of fire and explosion, spill, or hazardous waste, that could occur as a result of this proposal? If so, describe. N/a non-project action 1) Describe special emergency services that might be required. N/a non-project action 2) Proposed measures to reduce or control environmental health hazards, if any: N/a non-project action b. Noise 1) What types of noise exist in the area which may affect your project (for example: traffic, equipment, operation, other)? N/a non-project action H:\EDNSP\P AA \Annexations\Lindberg\SEPA Checklist.doc 7 2) What types and levels of noise would be created by or associated with the project on a short-term or a long-term basis (for example: traffic, construction, operation, other)? Indicate what hours noise would come from the site. Nla non-project action 3) Proposed measures to reduce or control noise impacts, if any: Nla non-project action 8. LAND AND SHORELINE USE a. What is the current use of the site and adjacent properties? The current use of this area is primarily for detached single-family residences. There are currently 9 single-family residences. b. Has the site been used for agriculture? If so, describe. No. c. Describe any structures on the site. There are 9 detached single-family residences on this site, some with accessory buildings/garages. d. Will any structures be demolished? If so, what? This is a non-project action and it is unlikely that any of the structures will be demolished. e. What is the current zoning classification of the site? King County, R-4, 4 units per gross acre. f. What is the current comprehensive plan designation of the site? Renton Residential Single Family g. If applicable, what is the current shoreline master program designation of the site? Nla h. Has any part of the site been classified as an "environmentally sensitive" area? If so, specify. Yes, there are approximately 2.5 acres of wetlands on the northern portion of the area. This wetland has been classified by King County as type 2. H:\EDNSP\P AA \Annexations\Lindberg\SEPA Checklist.doc 8 i. Approximately how many people would reside or work in the completed project? This is a non-project action. It is expected that at full build out this area would contain 63 single family homes, or approximately 158 persons would reside in the area at full build out. j. Approximately how many people would the completed project displace? Nla non-project action k. Proposed measures to avoid or reduce displacement impacts, if any: Nla non-project action I. Proposed measures to ensure the proposal is compatible with existing and projected land uses and plans, if any: The proposed prezoning will help ensure the proposal is compatible with existing and projected land uses and plans, if any. 9. HOUSING a. Approximately how many units would be provided, if any? Indicate whether high, middle, or low-income housing. This is a non-project action. Currently there are 9 single-family dwelling units on this site. At full build out this area could contain a maximum of 63 single-family homes. b. Approximately how many units, if any, would be eliminated? Indicate whether high, middle, or low-income housing. Nla non-project action. c. Proposed measures to reduce or control housing impacts, if any: Nla non-project action 10. AESTHETICS a. What is the tallest height of any proposed structure(s}, not including antennas; what is the principal exterior building material(s} proposed. Nla non-project action b. What views in the immediate vicinity would be altered or obstructed? Nla non-project action H:\EDNSP\P AA \Annexations\Lindberg\SEP A Checklist.doc 9 c. Proposed measures to reduce or control aesthetic impacts, if any: Nla non-project action 11. LIGHT AND GLARE a. What type of light or glare will the proposal produce? What time of day would it mainly occur? Nla non-project action b. Could light or glare from the finished project be a safety hazard or interfere with views? Nla non-project action c. What existing off-site sources of light or glare may affect your proposal? Nla non-project action d. Proposed measures to reduce or control light and glare impacts, if any: Nla non-project action 12. RECREATION a. What designated and informal recreational opportunities are in the immediate vicinity? This is a non-project action. The project is approximately half a mile away from the nearest City or County park. b. Would the proposed project displace any existing recreational uses? If so, describe. Nla non-project action c. Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts on recreation, including recreation opportunities to be provided by the project or applicant, if any: Nla non-project action. Future development would be required to pay Renton's Parks Mitigation Fee. 13. HISTORIC AND CULTURAL PRESERVATION a. Are there any places or objects listed on, or proposed for, national state, or local preservation registers known to be on or next to the site? If so, generally describe. H:\EDNSP\P AA \Annexations\Lindberg\SEPA Checklist.doc 10 Nla non-project action b. Generally describe any landmarks or evidence of historic, archaeological, scientific, or cultural importance known to be on or next to the site. Nla non-project action c. Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts, if any: Nla non-project action 14. TRANSPORTATION a. Identify public streets and highways serving the site, and describe proposed access to the existing street system. Show on site plans, if any. The site is served by a minor arterial-13£fh Ave SEiDuvall Ave NE. This is a non-project proposal. b. Is site currently served by public transit? If not, what is the approximate distance to the nearest transit stop? No, the nearest transit stop is approximately 114 of a mile away from the site at 4th and Duvall. c. How many parking spaces would the completed project have? How many would the project eliminate? Nla non-project action d. Will the proposal require any new roads or streets, or improvements to existing roads or streets, not including driveways? If so, generally describe (indicate whether public or private? Nla non-project action. Future development must comply with Renton's Development Regulations. e. Will the project use (or occur in the immediate vicinity of) water, rail, or air transportation? If so, generally describe. Nla non-project action f. How many vehicular trips per day would be generated by the completed project? If known, indicate when peak volumes would occur. Assuming the most likely scenario of 63 units at full development it is estimated that there would be approximately 630 AWDTE. H:\EDNSP\P AA \Annexations\Lindberg\SEPA Checklist.doc 11 I g. Proposed measures to reduce or control transportation impacts, if any: Nla non-project action 15. PUBLIC SERVICES a. Would the project result in an increased need for public services (for example: fire protection, police protection, health care, schools, other)? If so, generally describe. Nla non-project action. b. Proposed measures to reduce or control direct impacts on public services, if any. Nla non-project action 16. UTILITIES a. Nla non-project action b. Describe the utilities that are proposed for the project, the utility providing the service, and the general construction activities on the site or in the immediate vicinity which might be needed. Nla non-project action C. SIGNATURE I, the undersigned, state that to the best of my knowledge the above information is true and complete. It is understood that the lead agency may withdraw any declaration of non-significance that it might issue in reliance upon this checklist should there be any willful misrepresentation or willful lack of full disclosure on my part. Proponent: Name Printed: Rebecca Lind for City of Renton Date: H:\EDNSP\P AA \Annexations\Lindberg\SEPA Checklist.doc 12 D. SUPPLEMENTAL SHEETS FOR NONPROJECT ACTIONS onpolici~s. plans and Because these questions are very general, it may be helpful to read them in conjunction with the list of the elements of the environment. When answering these questions, be aware of the extent the proposal, or the types of activities likely to result from the proposal, would affect the item at a greater intensity or at a faster rate than if the proposal were not implemented. Respond briefly and in general terms. 1. How would the proposal be likely to increase discharge to water; emissions to air; production, storage, or release of toxic or hazardous substances; or production of noise? It is unlikely that the proposal would have any affect on the above environmental issues. Additional residential development is likely to occur on this site with or without the proposal. Proposed measures to avoid or reduce such increases are: New development resulting as a consequence of these proposed amendments would be required to comply with the City's development regulations, including the City's Critical Areas Ordinance. 2. How would the proposal be likely to affect plants, animals, fish, or marine life? There would be no affect on plants, animals, fish, or marine life as a direct consequence of this non-project, prezoning proposal. There may be some displacement of existing vegetation to clear undeveloped lots for future development, which is likely to occur under the both the present conditions and the proposal. Proposed measures to protect or conserve plants, animals, fish, or marine life are: None at this non-project level. Development of additional dwe/lingunits under this proposal must comply with City of Renton regulations and with Renton's Critical Areas Ordinance. Any measures needed in this regard will be implemented at the project level review. 3. How would the proposal be likely to deplete energy or natural resources? The proposed non-project action will not deplete energy or natural resources. Future project level development may impact energy or natural resources slightly but will not deplete them. Proposed measures to protect or conserve energy and natural resources are: None are proposed at this non-project action stage. 4. How would the proposal be likely to use or affect environmentally sensitive areas or areas designated (or eligible or under study) for governmental protection; such as parks, wilderness, wild and scenic rivers, threatened or endangered species habitat, historic or cultural sites, wetlands, flood plains, or prime farmlands? H:\EDNSP\P AA \Annexations\Lindberg\SEP A Checklist.doc 13 This proposal would likely not use or affect environmentally sensitive areas. At such time that additional dwelling units are developed on this site, they will be subject to City of Renton critical area regulations and development standards that are designed to protect environmentally sensitive areas. Proposed measures to protect such resources or to avoid or reduce impacts are: Nla. 5. How would the proposal be likely to affect land and shoreline use, including whether it would allow or encourage land or shoreline uses incompatible with existing plans? The proposed prezoning of this area will increase compatibility with the surrounding uses since it will limit future development to single-family detached housing currently prevalent in the area. King County zoning allows both detached and attached units in its R-4 zone. Renton's zoning uses net developable area to determine project density, not gross developable area. This results in less intensive development adjacent to sensitive areas. With current bonuses and incentives King County zoning at 4 units per gross acre can easily be increased to over 6 units per acre. This is comparable to Renton's proposed zoning of 8 units per net acre. Proposed measures to avoid or reduce shoreline and land use impacts are: None. 6. How would the proposal be likely to increase demands on transportation or public services and utilities? At current levels of development there are 9 units and approximately 900 AWDVTE in this area. Additional development is likely to occur in this area with or without the proposal. At full development there is a potential for 63 units, or 630 A WDVTE at maximum development. Proposed measures to reduce or respond to such demand(s) are: None. 7. Identify, if pOSSible, whether the proposal may conflict with local, state, or federal laws or requirements for the protection of the environment. The proposal will not conflict with local, state, or federal laws or requirements for protection of the environment. SIGNATURE I, the undersigned, state that to the best of my knowledge the above information is true and complete. It is understood that the lead agency may withdraw any declaration of non-significance that it might issue in reliance upon this checklist should there be any willful misrepresentation or willful lack of full disclosure on my part. Proponent: /ltIn,uIfJ tt~d , H:\EDNSP\P AA \Annexations\Lindberg\SEP A Checklist.doc 14 Name Printed: Rebecca Lind for City of Renton Date: H:\EDNSP\P AA \Annexations\Lindberg\SEPA Checklist.doc 15