Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
LUA-05-106
City of m.n Department of Planning / Building / Public as ENVIRONMENTAL & DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: COMMENTS DUE: APPLICATION NO: LUA05-106, CU-H, ECF APPLICANT: T-Mobile -Madeline Chane ,Odelia Pacific Cor PROJECT TITLE: T-Mobile Mono ole @ 1s1 Presb erian Church SITE AREA: 4.01 acres BUILDING AREA LOCATION: 2640 Benson Road S WORK ORDER NO: 77473 SUMMARY OF PROPOSAL: Installation of an approximately 60-foot tall Monopole structure disguised as a light pole and assoicated equipment/storage building. The subject site is 4.02 acres (175,111 square feet) in area and is located within the Residential-8 dwelling unit per acre zoning designation. The monopole and equipment/storage building would be located within the south-central portion of the subject site and is a minimum of 100 feet from other residentially zoned properties. Access to the monopole and equipment/storage building would be provided via an existing driveway directly onto Benson Road S. A. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT (e.g. Non-Code) COMMENTS Element of the Probable Probable More Element of the Probable Probable More Environment Minor Major Information Impacts Impacts Necessary Environment Minor Major Information Impacts Impacts Necessary Earth Housina Air Aesthetics Water Light/Glare Plants Recreation Land/Shoreline Use Utilities Animals Transportation Environmental Health Public Services Energy/ Historic/Cultural Natural Resources Preservation Airport Environment 10,000 Feet 14,000 Feet B. POLICY-RELA TED COMMENTS C. CODE-RELATED COMMENTS We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas in which we have expertise and have identified areas of probable impact or areas where additional info~~d to properly assess this proposal. t "b-()Y--O r Signature of Director or Authorized Representative Date • • AFFIDA VIT OF SERVICE BY MAILING STA TE OF WASHINGTON) ) ss. County of King ) Nancy Thompson being first duly sworn, upon oath, deposes and states: That on the 28thday of November 2005, affiant deposited via the United States Mail a sealed envelope(s) containing a decision or recommendation with postage prepaid, addressed to the parties of record in the below entitled application or petition. Signature: tary Public in and for the State of Washington esiding at & Yl rcrT\ ,therein. Application, Petition or Case No.: T-Mobile Monopole at First Presbyterian Church File No.: LUA 05-106, CU-H, ECF The Decision or Recommendation contains a complete list of the Parties of Record. IIP-.-/ ~ I I I I __ r--'---, I I '-. r' -"-,,-1'---' '-..........rE)~EGI;lATIOtI, I I / , -' J r '-......rEIGAA5S, I _ I ( ..._-' ·--.1 (~ .~n . -"...t:- ·f 1;~---1· .,."., l';~ :~;;I :~n L. 'Iltl ~Y. n ;~,-J II ~" I 1 ~ ::1~:~~::O£l"S) , IPlvOlC£5TME ...... iOroE.rUI ISHSH' .... lfOAOf' .. I..S: 1")CHUI'ICl<lir~ DEVELOPMENT PlANNING CITY OF RENTON AUG 262005 (P)T INllE s.o.WCUT (E)ClIR8'Sl.OP£I'E .... cOtoCtw.P fROI.Ilfl.uF't1AJ.Tflhl",CAAOE1oIPlcoo.caulO,.Csu.e '--'E1P~~OT-"""" 0~ , l:sdf ---'>1" \ i --, _. 6 r-· ;,r.....! '~i ;~ . ~.)o' . . ''I' ~);,. 'PJV~u~~~~!J ~. (E)Ii"WToa"REt.lOVED~ 2U'IoIINst.Ts.t.CKFRQI.' IE1CttUACHaul.O,1G [Plll'·UIGP'iCCOtoOl.HlHltIPOWfHTOIlOA'.:ot<f~ l jP:I'I.·uGPVCC0f10UIU >--:~,::_ ..... ~~":'-""'''~M"'''''''~'N'''' ........ IP)'-UlG pvc n.coAOUTINO 1101 F. r (5feSH1 ... ·IFOAROUTIltGI ...... ~"''',''-~'''''.~'''-. '0 -., . O<lr.o r====~--:--'-= ----'--. -------------------j I~~· ~~!i'£I!!! 1MOl "'"'ntCIIUX "WY " ",,"IU.. WAMOt1 on.c:. 1."1""" PRO..IICT IN'ORM.nO", r BENSON RD/CHURCH MP SE4883F 2140 INN.ON RD RENTON, WA 88056 [( ..... 0 ::'LDINQ PERMIT 11- ,RIlV •• IOM "ISTO"YI • .. _ ...... .,, .. , -"~~----. -----t------t-_._ . . -L--~----+--:..- ~--------:---1- .-.!.---1" 11~ .. ~'-1~!;;~~~~~~-~·;:~~-;:·~ _ ~: ann~_.~~~~~~ ___ ; .. B: 112111<X16 :,"UfDOf51GN~VIEW : 11..11 JILl". PIII:PARED .", ~ B. J. THOMAS, P.E. 7807 80TH AVE NE MARYSVILLE, WA 98270 206·851·1108 [ DRAWN 8'" = CtuL 8", = APPV. 8YI-, I ... .... ... r uc .... u • ., ....... .·\o~:l, •• l ~§l" ... "<: ... : I:; ;\ t . . ~,.,,/'1!.:~~;.,.\'\' .:.,;l • .. -I~I \I-;.L ~"" •• ....-....... '''r-~;_- IQUIPMINTl [I VO!Ct:lilRE...,. MRlLEli5 "",1L:,...1<5 tOC"UD ON" !rI-II' 4C.LPOU WIlMI1SfOUIP ... ENI IN NO EOUIf't,otN' SHtlIE~t.lAA THE IiASE Of nl£",ONOPOlE DRAWING IN,ORMATION, ~oo,,,,,,,~,,,,,,.,,,,, 'OO"'''''OH~''~~'~. OHfN&!ON5 N4D.o,ov1Sof CONSUL '''''''501 NH fFlflORS I<l'<OOIlllSSlOHS AltPRlVIOIJSISSLJ(SOf lHIl>ORAwlHG .uu:SUP[ASEDfQeYTtEl ... rESfR(\ISIOI'I THE. 1'If00 ..... lIOHComAI'IED IN nilS SET or OOCw.:Nl5 1$ Pf\OPRIETAArS'NATUHE.lIIolUSEOAOISClOSIJFI:[ Ol .. £A TH...,.. VtlilCH IS IIE .... TEO TO "",,",,0 ClENT 1$ 5lt1.lCnl~0tiIB1TEO L.-'" ," "---'''.~'"'' ~ ~ ENLARGED SITE PLAN , ~ 1 ~---------- t .. ,.-., ' ", '-I DRAWI ..... U ....... --- . ",-=" .. ~~~,.'"'.... : [I A-1.1 II (-! .. -/~ \ ~ IIAPOWf: NIO PO~[ St<.\~l IE P'"""'(O 4HJ1-llI..NU:8AO_ NfilPO..~STI'VCT~0t:5.lGHa'Oh"'l'I$ , -·,--I()UTII"fWPQ..( ~r; ~~. ! .~ l\fWor£U 01,' /'[IC .. "'OI(;".'oo '; '~ +-: !- ~~ I.lIM.!THI90·~~·~6~Z:: 0 '.', ,...lCO'U'AI'<OUECTNO:: .... I,fA~.::t.TO H~'tO ... tlfPOU . '-: . ',. ",.' OI~:Pl'~I.aail~"U;'·~ DEVELOPMENT PLANNING CITY OF RENTON AUG 262005 !l'::]l,i;"!:,'~;',:P!":l:!:,:biV:i!':!::""·,, ';,i"':':'!:!.';"":'::: ':":!j!'ili It, r ! ~-____ ----.-IL ~,~ ~~ ----~.~~~~w-~,~ - - - --- , 1lI.....:.o ,Il' Itf1 ~.~OIIrOl(;.O'II.JfII(Ol'_tI @~~f~~~ON Ibl)§C.trtf :\1\1'., ..... ~. , __ , 1IKNITltCM.&. NWY • kJnC.&. •• a ... ,1 OfftCaj"'I""1OO I'IIOJICT .M'OAM"nOM, r BENSON RD/CHURCH MP SE4683' 2140 u .. so.. RD UNTON, ...... [(""""D;::LDINGPERMIT II . RlvaalOM MlncHlY, eMIl. ~... I ." ." &."'''" &'112~ .. [vpt,,~[_ WIt!! ..... &'Ir1"~ a:.s"'£OtJt50(it014l'''''' PLUtI ", .... R&D .'fl r B. J. THOMAS, P.E. 7807 80TH AVE NE MARYSVILLE, WA 98270 206·85' • t1 06 [ DIU." .VI =CMK. .y,:. """1 .• Y, ..... I ..... IIJT ... [ ""' ...... ..., ..... "':~ii~>·· ~;.a:·E -. .. '''' , .: .1,." Ii "II<W-" ~' • •• I""" •• ,.40 ........ IQUI .... am [I 'IOI(£51"L""" _(cI.~$ /IIo'~~~OCAIUI Of'<o. 1011·"" .t..C.I.P().t .... 1' ... ,SI~ .. I ... l,h~().J1I't ..... , \ •• ulu ........ • ... .....sr'lf'O-C"O-" .... lo.l DAA""Q UtFOIUIIAnOfilI [ """'" ~ .. ~.~ ,~" ... ""~~" ,'", ... =:.--::..,.~ :,II~~~':;..~u~'5:T,',': ,~~ ~ IoJIIlSUl'tRSU::.tO,V".lo.ltS'"hl$lO'o '" ... OIUoU-TCftC'""" ..... (D ... n.6iCT0600cut.l("" ... PfIOPfOl:lN\'.' .... '\Jft "",uSEU-OISoCt~ or"'E~ , ............ ..; .. 15 1Ol ..... 'tQ IO.....u(QC~ll .. , IS .',.O';'l' .... OI-<U"IO DAAWI;;, [I :::.=:J] [C-"A;L] ~-... ......... / , '3,,0- ,UI1U, {;:::;:;,::-r.;:." r _ _ ""'.AlllolOUNTEO 1 -EOUIPMEIiT I I I I I : IT!P) IU ;;r ENCLOSU @BTS SCAU IIr. ".(I'" HE PLAN UU~J BTS ENCLOSURE @ !,~~~.~~?R ELEVATION OOUau:7.4' TOP PtATES r""fAAloO...c; fi.IS'OC r.,OPT IKITTOlolpt.a.T[ E'iGII*,EflED TRUSSES024'OC ~~'l-'-L0J.=r~ "~~.J~. 6'WOOOFAC~ '~-:I~~j~~~-)--~". kUj·.M·t<~O'PlANK PR""Wlf:'-TU~07" -E).9()SURESIOING '·fHICK1~PSI UlNCRfTESl.0.8W,.' ~~VSCPITOC,£.a.C11 BTS ENCLOSURE ® FRAMING DETAIL .... :1 5C","ENT5 sw"'WOOO CO!'< ... iRHIlII DEVELOPMENT PLANNING CITY OF RENTON AUG 262005 RECEIVED noo,",,,,,,."\ ... oro,,~"W" \ I--\. : \ /~ , ~ <. ~PHl,)pa$fOt "."..;."'"~ @ FOOTING DETAIL A·l NTS 1~'p\!:~~=~J SlGw.GE ISH DfT.l.. StlT ~i r.l£lERIIIoSE ~, BTS ENCLOSURE @ ~~,S!, ELEVATION •' , _.------=-=-.-._-_.-"," ---------------~--.. . -.--.. --------- c::-::-=: .. BTS ENCLOSURE ® ~.?.~!H ELEVATION b'. T ROll UP DOOR I=-=--=-== CO/jTI/'OIJ~~TTERIIYP1"""'\. __ _ ..... u"'r'u"'~~.=. \, .......... I~J12" 18" WOOD lOUVER VEl'll w,SCRklN,:f<OHfLOQfI g BTS ENCLOSURE ® ~g~!H ELEVATION l la·,'>! ""'" ·1II'tlCOlrolf'051TIONSHIIiGlE5CHAHCOI.LIII....c ... -15l-B.ROOFINGfElT ·l2"PlVWOODSl;[ .... Tt1!NG • ... _ut..cTllR~OROOf TRuSSES IIllP'IlCI11.'0 C m:-I ·~T6·.rHN\CJlPLNll\f'fIIMEOTE.IOVFlEOr.LIlIIG 'ISUI f£LTOfITI'\'EJlHOUSEWRAP ·1·2°COXPlYMJOO ·TM°'MXX)5TllOS.a.T lIi"O'CWlr •• 'p.T BOTTO ... PI.A,TIEAoND(2)r""TOPPlATES -----------------------------------]--------------------------------------- "'.'RE",~" BTS ENCLOSURE (SEEO[TAll.llitfT 0) @ WE,IT ELIVAnON .... J SOH' ~T5 ~. IMOl NDJlTMCR&I. .. "''" II .on.u ........ , OrrICII4III.JN.'1OQ PRo.tlECT IN'ORMAnONI ~ BENSON RD/CHURCH MP SE4663F a640 BENION AD RJ:HTOH, WA NOOa [(,"UI. =::L~ING ;;;";;!:] REVISION HISTORY. Cft"-",.,. .r, .r, -1---------,--.. :-- I I =CL-.~=--=t1~~ , I . i~~t:l;#=,;--J:~,f-~ _ 8: '~~OO5 ;'SSUeOfOAIIPS i aJT i 1M' &fl~~~: r'~~~~~:lliJ~TI-:;- PLAN' PAl r B. J. THOMAS, P.E. 7607 60TH AVE NE MARYSVILLE, WA 98270 206·851·1106 PARED BYI [ VOiCESlflE"-'" W1AEu:SSMIl_,..,....slOC ... 1[OOh .... ~~·ll· ::;~~Eh~~~:~:~~E~~~IENT DRAWING lHfORlilATIDNI [ DO NOT SC","E I.I/V.wlo'IGS CCI'I1AACTDR loIUST VEotil"Y I\U =~~~~::'~~~~~SU~T5~tT:::~~~~ "'RfSllPIERlMlJtonT,*l"'IESTP:E~1S1Qro THE "*ClIUrU>TICN CONTAINEO ~ Tl<\S SET Of' DOCUf,lEN1"S IS PAOf'P:IiTAAYIiTNATUR£ ""'l,iSEORDlSClOSLil'I{ 0111ER !l«N 'MHCI1 IS f'h ... 1ED TO N"",,£D Ct lENT IS S'illCllY~Ot<IIIITED DRAWING TrrUI ~ •• C~ .... , ..,.~" [1--"A-3 II Jam and Smudge Free Printing Use Avery® TEMPLATE 5160® SAIREZ TEODOLFO C+GAIL Y 16501 BENSON RD S RENTON WA 98055 ROSA JAMES V 2724 BENSON RD S RENTON W A 98055 FIRST PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH OF RENTON 10414 SE 164TH ST RENTON W A 98055 HILLSIDE LLC C/O GRAND PEAKS PROP MGMT 4582 S ULSTER ST PKWY #1200 DENVER CO 80237 DEMIDIO BRADLEY T+YELSA WIL 1409 S 27TH ST RENTON W A 98055 HILLESTAD STEVE+DEBRA 1305 S 27TH ST RENTON W A 98055 RAZI HAMID & MASAUJI GEANE 2603 CEDAR A V S RENTON W A 98055 LOCLARENCE 2608 CEDAR A V S RENTON W A 98055 ESPINOSA ORLANDO M+ELEANOR 2626 CEDAR A V S RENTON W A 98055 KUBIK WILLIAM J 2714 CEDAR AV S RENTON W A 98055 --www.avery.com 1-800-GO-AVERY I ~ AVERY® 5160® FABER BRUCE R I 3835 19TH AVE SW SEATTLE WA 98106 P A TU-OWENS VIRGINIA F POBOX 18996 SEATTLE WA 98118 SPATH VELMA L 16415 BENSON RD S RENTON W A 98055 ZIMMERMAN ADAM+ELIZABETH W TRUST 1417 S 27TH ST RENTON W A 98055 SCHEMNITZER JOSEPH 1405 S 27TH ST RENTON W A 98055 BRYCE KENNETH S 2611 CEDARAV S RENTON WA 98055 BENTZ MICHAEL D 1207 S 26TH ST RENTON W A 98055 I KOLBYSENT I 16427 BENSON RD S ! RENTON W A 98055 RENTON SCHOOL DIST 403 I 300 SW 7TH ST I RENTON W A 98055 < I DAVIS AARON 2705 BENSON RD S RENTON W A 98055 AVILA SHELAH N+ALFREDO B 1413 S 27TH ST RENTON W A 98055 CUMMINGS GLENN R+RUTH A 1307 S 27TH ST RENTON W A 98055 I DELANCEY ROBERT D 2607 CEDAR A V S RENTON W A 98055 SIEVERS MICHAEL W+ELENA 1211 S 26TH ST RENTON W A 98055 . MORRIS RICHARD D & SHERIL . : I NGOQUOC J 2614 CEDAR AV S RENTON WA 98055 WARD TERI+ JAMES II 2702 CEDAR AV S RENTON W A 98055 KIM YOUNG W+KANG HYUNG 2720 CEDAR AV S i RENTON W A 98055 AH:I/W-09-008-~ wo)"A!aAe·MMM -- 2620 CEDAR A V S I RENTON W A 98055 FERRER-MCNEAL ELMA S PO BOX 58372 RENTON W A 98058 HERNANDEZFRANK+LUPE 2300 BENSON RD S #A-l I RENTON W A 98055 @09~S :a.!Jeqe6 al zaS!I!m ap!deJ a6e4J<;Is I? :a.a a6eJJnoq!:a.ue uo!SSaJdWI , \ I , , I Jam and Smudge Free Printing Use Avery® TEMPLATE 5160® DOS SANTOS EDSON GOMES JR+ELAINE 2300 BENSON RD S #A-2 RENTON W A 98055 GILLS EMMAL 2300 BENSON RD S #A-5 RENTON W A 98055 KRIV ACIC JOHN F+NATALIZIO 2300 BENSON RD S #B-2 RENTON W A 98055 CLARY -MAHAN T ARYN JEANNETTE 2300 BENSON RD S #B-5 RENTON W A 98055 CITY LIGHTS LLC 4030 LK WASHINGTON BLVD N #201 KIRKLAND WA 98033 RICHARDSON MARK 2300 BENSON RD S #C-4 RENTON W A 98055 MIY AMOTO ALEX T 2300 BENSON RD S #D-1 RENTON W A 98055 SPURRIER DIANE 2300 BENSON RD S #D-4 RENTON W A 98055 BROWN WARDELL F 2300 BENSON RD S #E-3 RENTON W A 98055 COY BRIAN M+BORT KELI E 2300 BENSON RD S #F-2 RENTON W A 98055 --www.avery.com 1-800-GO-AVERY ! MITCHELL PATRICK I M+TAMILEE 2300 BENSON RD S #A-3 RENTON W A 98055 TOY JOYCEM 2300 BENSON RD S #A-6 RENTON W A 98055 MILLS LESLEY K 2300 BENSON RD S #B-3 RENTON W A 98055 BOOKER BEVERLY A 2300 BENSON RD S #B-6 RENTON W A 98055 COLLINS WILLIAM L 2300 BENSON RD S #C-2 RENTON W A 98055 FAUST KEN A 2300 BENSON RD S #C-5 RENTON W A 98055 PLEISS LISA K 2300 BENSON RD S #D-2 I RENTON WA 98055 CYPHERS JUDY A 2300 BENSON RD S #E-1 RENTON W A 98055 MARQUARDT HILDA R 2300 BENSON RD S #E-4 RENTON W A 98055 , VALDEZ CHRISTOPHER PASCUA 2300 BENSON RD S #F-3 RENTON W A 98055 AH3/\V-09-o08-~ WO)·,{JaAe·MMM -- ~ AVERY® 5160® LAWSON ANDREWH+ADASSA , JB 2300 BENSON RD S #A-4 RENTON WA 98055 NEILL RICHARD SCOTT POBOX 59955 RENTON W A 98058 LO EVA WAI-YIN 2300 BENSON RD S #B-4 RENTON W A 98055 WONG YEE-MAN+WUN YING LEUN 2300 BENSON RD S #B-7 RENTON W A 98055 BAKER DONALD E 2300 BENSON RD S #C-3 RENTON W A 98055 VOLDJAMES W 2300 BENSON RD S #C-6 RENTON W A 98055 'MCCREARY DAVID &HSU RUEY 2300 BENSON RD S #D-3 RENTON W A 98055 HILFRINK TAUNY A 2300 BENSON RD S #E-2 RENTON W A 98055 I HUNDLEY ERIK L I 2300 BENSON RD S #F-1 RENTON W A 98055 -: 'VORAVONGSENG VIMONEKEOK 2300 BENSON RD S #F-4 RENTON W A 98055 @09~S :a.!Jeqe6 al zas!I!:a.n ap!deJ a6e4)~s I? :a.a a6eJJnoq!:a.ue uo!ssaJdWI Jam and Smudge Free Printing Use Avery® TEMPLATE 5160® CUSIN MARGO A 2300 BENSON RD S #F-5 RENTON W A 98055 NGUYEN SOPHIA 2300 BENSON RD S #G-3 I RENTON W A 98055 SAWYER VANESSA A+SCOTT JACQ 2300 BENSON RD S #H-2 RENTON WA 98055 --www.avery.com 1-800-GO-AVERY SZATKIEWICZ JAMES+MARY i LOU ~ 2300 BENSON RD S #G-1 : RENTON W A 98055 MOUTON GLENDA L 2300 BENSON RD S #G-4 RENTON W A 98055 RABENA NICHOLAS F+KA THERINE , 2300 BENSON RD S #H-3 RENTON W A 98055 I AH3/"'-09-008-~ -wo)"NaJ\e·MMM - ~ AVERY® 5160® WONGDAVIDM , 2300 BENSON RD S #G-2 I RENTON W A 98055 GESELL JUDITH I 2300 BENSON RD S #H-1 RENTON W A 98055 i POON HAI+CHONG PUI YING 16510 167TH ST SW RENTON W A 98058 I ' @09~S :a.!Jeqe6 at zas!I!:a.n ap!deJ a6e4:>~s I? :a,a a6eJJnoq!:a.ue uo!ssaJdWI VICINITY MAP lbices.~l!r Global Wireless by ~ • • Mobile·e BENSON RD/CHURCH MP 2640 BENSON RD RENTON. WA 98055 SITE NUMBER: SE4663F LATITUDE 470 27' 23.6-N LONGITUDE 1220 12' 3.8-W PROJECT TEAM PROJECT INFORMAnON PROJECT DESCRIPTION .1 ...... fT'7 Itf l}4 ; ~ [ f 1" 'I: ~ __ -I ~ J-::~m;E ~\".~. ,_ ~1 ~~ ;P •• ,,;;...· ". £~t.~_~~ ~:S~SlI'1ERI/IN CtUOi Tt<! 1$ UI1&TAlrEO NoID R£lnteTED EOU ..... a..T NCl 'I'ILL IE USED FOR THI ~SNI:5lo. Of IVoDIO IW(iMAI.I FOA floE PURPOSI!QfPAOVIlttOPl.aCCRLULAA5oEAVU voaST"'AAlIMtUi.~UII PAOPO~I TOCClfiIITAUCT uo I,JKIilNfm ftL.f.~flOH5fIrCUTYCCf'I'ISTINQOfIT'Eau"':t(T lOCAll0~ANEw ,,'.(/'. )t'·IO"Sl'ElTEI'IOhPflN"U: PROPERTYMTh .AIIn:"""'lOC ... TtOON"'NEW~'·"·"'GlmELUOH0f'0L,[2.·" ''!"l~ I If !a.: f f ,.::=;:.:.:) !' \\ , _ t· " K~"~ " . \ • e,..,i:t ' "\10- ""-;:. t"t."""'"" . l.f ."\_", 1: " SlOIoOl' • r> UPt:GI .; 1 ,.ItMl911 ~ ... " .. ,. f .. ~.~t>I "'Ui~Qt" ,lOll:' ~1&b"" i -"""""" ",' COI'II!lII.oCTlOOI """"'''' ...,.a. I I-s' ~$Ul.TIoIG 1001."""'1 ... ,1 "",.lOf1'111AN056 ~n!!!~fV.Li5.5 I-.GJI'OOfITKCN:bPIIWYH &01fEH.W,o,tIOlI .1> .... 1»1 "'OICl'not:~ ~L..I.iSCl"Tf"1£11K"'T ncs lalPKJHE EQUIP_NT f.t.CI-1TY WIU lIE SfJW'::EO CINL 1 B' \IOCUTP.f..UII WIRUUIEIIWI.Ol(..UNo{JTKE WORt\. ,""SOCIiIITEDwm;,.,..l fOU""';wr CN\INOTIIf PEiU'OAWD B' tWiD'::iIIPf'lO PERSONS TKlSf.t.C .. I11'WUllff"EQJ(NnO~ln5EA"'IC£PEltSOrIlCl fOARiP",,"PufIPOSES ~SU""'Tl01Mi~RlCAHSWIDI OI$A&l.nIEIACIIAOill).illPPE~B51CT'lOtl'11 "~"lTHIS ,..c:L/hlSl.a:.:E"""1'QWJHiII.T.IoCT ~~~W .. TlA0fII5OlIlWA..5ltWl.lKCltNUVoTUl"'TTttIS ~oa"l'It:~ WFtL.E51_n-..ct: CRt1\! COME PERSoON) WU ......u! """'VlIVoGi Of OM tRlPPEllliIICItI1H"TONE~PE~ .-ZONINGINFORMAnON S(fE~" SUMlf DEVELOPMENT PLANNING CITY OF RENTON AUG 262005 RECEIVED DRAWING INDEX ENl~DlII1l!PVI< PfOOI'OSlOSIfE1U"'''Tt:lf< £LfC~Snlr:P\.NI ELfClJUCALGRClUtIDIoIGPI..AN ElECTAICAL.GROIJIoIOIoIGOElM.S ElfC~OETM.1 . '".~ ~ ... \"""s-[~ 'JI14OtoIA&Pf nOl1I11H,o,V£I'&: ~IIVLLf.W"lIUlO ..oeLf,...,HI. ISl~PI I. J .. ,~'I ! I ~ I I tel""at ~ION =:=:'''''''LlSS ~-~~~··~~~;DC~~~~_.__ t"~''''''':::;':!I'I~''':;''':;'''='====''----'''':''------ .. ~~~~ __ ._ 1-. ":~.:;':-I"...,:'-"':::"':;:'~"::O:=:":."":7.:':::';:,""":::" __________ _ • '~l :r::~:~t""WI'H C~~~ __ ~_ J ! ~4tS!' r .. ______ .~~~.~~~J_.~~.____ ~~~~~_ nmVINO DIRIECTIONS =~~iWOl~LUS CODE COMPUANCE SIT(m>e; UIIU,.,.,IDTllICOMfACLtrf ==1"-=O:':!!"~OM<A='----------'='------1 1.nl'lOflfHCI'IU\llP'~"'If'" r' ~~.~~=I2I ~~f£==!t-::~f.='~ol'lJ-------------1-'~''''''~'!.!''''''~'----------~!!....---~ I- APPROVALS 1 ... IIIQICl'fTO ...... S_TM:AAMPC»I'"*lUTt~WCAlNTON 211lAES 1."'" 0J(10 OJ' ........ u PWr , •• ",,. WlI.uT 21lOWIlAQ-"'A ... \I£' 0'''11 I TUf1IINGrfTOHTO.QINIYW,",Y.OAIiOL.ES . • ~IUGtfTONTOT...aIII1I).'_tl' 0.11&1:1 • TUf1IILD'tONTOIP\,\Q£lOl'LO ..... S .TUf1II ..... '~TO.fIIOIO"lI .. CUNU. AMIIIIt:...,IlNIQNI'O.MNlc* .... _ DIIT~~.'....a. ~TI",,"l'" .--.no _ CQD(5,uIoOOPftO.1THrlOCo1\LOO .......... AI.IntOFIIrES H01 .. loIGor. THESE "'--115 TO. COIdlJlUCTlOTO"' ...... 'IIIIOAI< HOT CONfOlUlllloQ TO lHllf. CODI. NOlHfUVoj.to.TIC»IALIUU!H>CODl JOO3 ",,""""'TIClMAl ,.UlEHTW. OQCII: I-------------I===~~:-2IlO2,.P .... ·""T~Fu(lQl.lcoot:P"'MQP~I'I.'''""''fD'II ~" :tctI11'Ifl''' "-UQUtf"IEOPETACUUI!I GAl CODlIPI'ICIP_ "STAlVoTIOfIIS(H.l'l I JOIXIffllfIM",'I1CtUoC."'OOOl -----1 ilQlDt.wI'OfIMJII.........:Icoot: JOll"""TICIfUo&.U(CTAlC#lLCOD£ JCId,....T\CII'6oIi l ... cmc wn" CODE lQC,ll,.l!I.LDNlcoot:OfIDfUHCfS NfI.Ilr",,'E .. ·m·' ...... IOI ...... ...".,...,(;()DI LEGAL DESCRIPTION IIlQSWCXlRC$" , .. OFHWIjIIlt1" .. I2·lIiunnTOPOlilfH" .... U·,.I: :no'T Tt1t1GI-ta1G [J4.~n IH "Illn TonlUlOf ""ION AD lK a' ..... c so U"'I.J" nl.lJ.' to POIiI U.SI CUAQ,TII.EU "':" ~'.I CALLl1700.424~555"" UTI.ITES UhOERGROUNO LOCAYo. CfHTER 11O.1rIT.ND,OR,W~ I "'~oc _"_'" _._ -.--0._ _1._101_ •• _ ... 'IU:O" __ ._ ......... --.'.,~.----" ..... ---~. 1NC17 MO.ntCM ..... , .. aoTKU.&., IIIA"U onMlI ,CUI "'7100 PRo.tlCT 1"'ORMAnONa r BENSON RD/CHURCH MP SE4883F 2MG BoaON RD UNTON, WA eeosa U IIU1D ;::LDING PERMIT II .RIEVIIiON K.nORY, i CIQI..~W • • v, ." -I---l-----.-j-l-I I--!--I !-. PLANaPRI ~ B. J. THOMAS, P.E. 7807 80TH AVE NE MARYSVILLE, WA 98270 206·851·1106 [ DRAWN 8"'1 =CNK. e"'l= ""PV. e"'l il I AM. I..,., I All 'I lLICIN.U.... .o>f'~~" l":.;}g;T~·") H" .. ·! .~ ),'''' '!'f ..• ;~~~~ .. . ....... . ~rL...-=~ IQUIPIIIINTI [I "'O'::UTRlNl\'tYJU:lUiS N<IlI:_Uloc",noor.",W·II· AGl POll WfTH8TSEQU .. WfNT 1'1 IWEQUIPNENT SHHT(A"E~T""IIASiC$T""WOtIOPOLE DRA .... Q ""OIIMAno", [ OONOl iiCo1\L£ DflA_GS COtflIUoC1OM NUST "'(Mf"l"U O~~I Nf(J,t,Q\I\S[ COMSUllNI1S C$ Nil tRHORl NIOOioAISaIONS o1\LlPNi"'IOlJSISSUlS0f1HISDRAWNj, AAlIUPfAIiDlO.Y1t£LA.Q:SfflE'l15.lCltj Tl1f H'ORMI\.TICIoI CONfANO" TtIlI5fl Of DOCIJ~HlS II ~'~'IYN"'ruRt. ~rU!iiORDl$CLOSI.lAE 0n.E,. '""""" _1Ct<IS A1I..AnD '0.......,..00. ... 11$ STM1CTlYflHOt;INTED [I-'-==:J [1-';:-1 II w----' SEC. 29, TWN. 23N, RGE. 5W, W.M. ~', " -E?b.---n S 26TH ST \ ' j; ·":~~if;;j/ ~/" ." ,- APN j".''/. // ' l/' ~:'/l I I ,tI292.3059102 h'('/~<: .'~ I Q «, !£: <3 I/) <'. Lu • QJ ., , , / -~.--!C' _ ..•• / / I I I / , ~ ~ / // , ' .. y-~ / .J . // .,,-: 1:« i'" "~: .<. -<. c, "': :~:.- ,,:' ,:~~~ :;.;";"J'OC; (,,1, ~~.~.~l~~~~/~~ ~P5'/~~'::J .. <t4:' /1 / . ~~~;~i~~r~:~1" w· '~1~~~~~;:09'ft;:;~J>;'7,,:,;.'~J /;;;'/';"';>;;-:;1!i<,:;: I I I ~G'I'~ Nt" "'CU:CT COWSI'U UI n.[ "'$' .... ~OON or .. a: .. I1 .... DDY\jUOolCl_ SIll .n-A 'If ....ct< "I),. l!ttl .CMJ"O,..f .. ..0 IT, ~~.....voT tQCAIlD ... * lira 1~1 SNlll" IoCa:SS 10 TIC. 1111 aJ. II N(l~o.y",..n ••• "('1"( ••• ~ _<l.".-..c; i.lIlllnlDt TJ~'" Vl( Bnwa"O ro_ _, '-2 ""~1 ~(II"CIO"') UTT..l lin: ...... CT 1$ ..... _U1D.oIOCI HIV"(lIt( _ .... !, .. c. "USIJIIIJ.$'" OWll>AfD ...,.a:CI tCOO1UC1011 ....... rVo.w>lf ~l'It COOIIQd .t.$ •• TItfl pj-WIcn otQJ_ IoI/D H NO.t:Cl IIfIIlCXUU 00 [~ C-.nr .~,,.. ........ toG .. , COWT~ .. _ "'-..... , 15 IICIlUIIlII =J~:;~~.-:ri,'~~:",~:~!,:<..:~ti,~~,=~n.:.:~~~:: _.otl "" 'OOSn.C CDtC>_, 011 OlIo(11S( ", .. crt II) ~ ~OC ... 50. ...ofCIII _..u: ... mt aIIoOo_'" .... _ .. IU) "'-I. LMI ....... -.seuu.. i1IOoOO'_ IH( IIll r~'i~...1~~' ,.-; --:: .... IUI._______ I . . '"'~.'~" -. ,." .. :'. -~~ _\:::;'''l!''~'=-'::4 . , - "', I t' '. t '~ . '-_"ri'_ :-~ J ' -" ::\::." _"":,,,~~ .. , / '---__ "oil.. J ~:.:'''':.'i=-~ ooQ'l.n.lUlr_'lIocn ... • .... ~'...ulI ... _to<l(LOI""""""'.~ '_.~....u. ___ IIl' I ~:~~If~~i,~ ~ ~~~.!: ___ "..IltM"I<. ~ ~=-:gE~'::.:u·~- i IWI!tMN qwmrr flDWD !1.=~l~''::~'\~~~:~ ~~~::~:.~ C# TIC: um. QU ... n"'U"".TI;lII~ •• (_) \ ,~~",:~=---.. n . -I 'g' ....... mn2. .~ ... n .. r: II l'IIo.£CT .. , ,. ill , L~.!';J U.DIIIL't1MD PUtClL .... • aii/ Ip!O!la. • IIID'''''''' cotn'I'QL Mona , ~~~~-==':':"':~l __ 01 CoII __ Ili_(L ........ I.CCO_,.-__ 1. lfI ___ a. .. _.,,_ 'oUllll" U1U1Uo. rc.~ I. .... -.-..or> ..... 00" ,_ AI: ........ , ............ ....,_ w .... ~_v.CQoU,. __ ~OO" Ilea CI< '.aunu ~,,:g:-:r-'~-~,mc:......,.-.... II. .... ~=~,J'~r.J:,Zi::~:fE~-:.r. =~~~'iC~~r:~?~t{ !MIl. nc 'oQLIIIU _1;10 nos""" ..... ,. _11lt.I~1UI_ I1l QII .. _CNOI .. "' .... CU __ "'_CIQASIO_ "'·'IW .. ~'OO"_"""' ..... ·CI .. mn.. __ iTnlOi._ O'O'~'_~I"" .. ~ '><l II': .. "",,,<. _1;10 ""' _ .. "" .. _ ..... __ ~ 'QII.\Ijngo.Illl .. <tCCNoI\Ol&......,.:""_I-..: __ . MM no: r.r.uKll .. IoU " -..«D "" _ 'III -..ce1Ul .TlIIOo N~II..cI "a;oI'Ul J(J -..., /"OIl 00_.1f aDIO_ ~~~ ............. _ MUII;._ W .. _n _ .. ' ~ lSe ,AOI.jllli ~ • "-'1m 0 ...... "" """",",'/ue IUI'OI"AOII _ ""'"'_w 11l_ t""~1OU[D __ n..c_ ~:n·= ~.Jl~~~fX-:-.l'.:(=:; ~::c "1;IO ........... ~ ....... -.-(oI>.,lQ ... , 10). ... '-....llFilIPOiUIiO.a.oo(UiOOoC_' ....... ""',,!1.. ... ·' .... "", .... "'.." .... _0.0"_ ... '...-00 __ D>" _.G "', :01 ...... _ .. "'~ • ....a.."., .. ~.'" -::....~~}[tC. ... "'ODiIL .... JlIo.(;. ...... _ ........ TlC .......... n ... cuc ........ "", .. ,.,....., .. """.n:.nvo-. ........ """""liID .. n....-n:I>I{ .. lD." "" ill<' hau"" 1;10 .. ""~ ... IIS ....u • OI9I"I"U' _ ..... ,_O._..-"""' •• "" .... "" ....... _, ..... _c • ..-t"Ol 'D ~~~~~E~~~~5:-- " "_'1llI CQ<1"'~~0l< 1Hl._n __ 1>1 ..... I[ 0I11A1.1.1l1 ., "" __ c W COo~""" w ... ,......c!I,1lM lI« ouu._ 00" "" ... a..Hl __ ............ 1.. .... "" ..... 0jl1.." .. . =':: ~ ~~~: ....... "'" __ "ll'1 CU ....... .... II. ..vi( ,,,, ... _,-,,,QI_._ ... CO<IU.II_I4,r ..... IIl-.ul".-...._lSIUf,...,"'_._ ~L_~ : .. :-;;..~T...:."':"_IIII11":.~~~::~~.m 11l ... t:tn..o t1 IHi IIIl CI ~ ::-.,:~':".:~ =t:: /;URIII<'U. _COoI"'en ... "" ..... ""-'" in .... ClIo .... ' .... "" 0"""-...... lUoaollli __ ' 1m WORK NOlU 1.'I" .... ("" ............ IlOfll«l'O<llRuC1"U1'I:IOI~l1IIIlQ l~._UlSIhGUllo.lnU"'IOII'Qli_.ta..SlllYC"'"" .... utounu"'O .. __ .. I_H<l'oIIIID"". J .... SlIl_ ........ U_ •• !lII""_OO .... cllNJ IfW'U,.,I.1III"'Ht:c:_iHlcu.lllt.Jt1lOliPtonc.~ ... 1.. • ~~.=~~"iHI_CQo...=c-;~r'.!!:'~ , 1I .... $IllcaoDU ......... SJOo_' ..... ""' ... u"""'" UI"~ Ml "c:I t~_l MD ~ ..... .. I "._I;II_W<IoUIICIW'aC(DIO. ____ ~ _loIIou."..IlIi __ JDl'VoI:lIoDolUf .... _ _ taa .-OLI .4"'''Pil ...... l .... ~""""'~~I'Iht:""'illWt __ ~ ..... MIIQJOIIflI"' .. -f_GII .. loH\ItcoOTlIIII :!.f';~.:-"'...:..::au.-/1111- •. QIIOO......:_ .. .04 .... ' .. 11 "S'I\JIII>IICZ 1lI nc I_.ll. :OW~M=c:a.~~-=.=-"'::* "'ClDIID~lQ_~NCl .... '_IOI.I.ux: .... CI..CGMI1 rOIl ~ ... I0Il0 8l*Po' COIlML ut:v t:LUI""Mt:N I I""LI\NNII'\IU CITY OF RENTON AUG 2 6 2005 RECEIVED VICINITY MAl' --,,-,- L.OAL DIICIUPTlON Alllllln\ .. lUIP[II.~SOOiIllfCOliDS II(C 5111 COR Of N[ '/4 OfN.'/41IiN 1II-'2-lIIE Blnn lIlP08 f,\ N III-H-J.I { 2!1O n "hi N O'-42-olll [ 10& I:> n 110 '~1 51 n TO n. Lro (I" IIU,SOoI AD f,\$1..Y o.I.G Sl) [LYLN 11J.37 n 10 Poe LiSS C/III IICTSlLSSOOIiIIO PROJ.C'T lin: DATA .r._IE_lA __ lIlN$ONlilloO ... _ ... ..:lij( .. !iOOIIWAO""'T"".".UO!i~ __ ."""",,,5 __ IOtl.liI: .. _,O<II.IU .. TOIO ... $tQ:olI 11oIt1llllXUff~ ,IUDMI'OJ COKJACOT LIlT _WOCUlJ\l ........ UL" ('U).)iIo-'''' _ l.lllocaoA$PL(~IU'·1I<» ___ IlII:><f1(Ulrwll"'l~oHa ~~ (_a')"'-$£I1, ___ tuooUNPi co INC (_I H'-'U, CJ.M.JD OTIJ"'~'AJUt~~ LOT or ~r ,31' h ~r::Il,n·.T ,,'. !!~MQ~!!G_'!!....T!! , _ IXN""';_ ._ ............ _ .•• ~£a""". TQ .. _II: "" _. Uf .... Il-..JD .... ,,_r.' ___ -IUTOO"ICL~.~.' I ""T>Vo-... .. ".....: ..... Clltl"'"''' .... '' .. ,atMV< ... .........:.S"lQIIW'....,. ... _ ••• ""ltI-...o<I""0' ... _.!OI''''' ................. I[ n~. ="~.:.";.~~~~!'~:.-::~ .. :.'IJI •• "'"-"".I ..... W ."" "" &'"!l._<tK"-' IOU .... """" 1D..a.:.q: "",......-, •• ~ a..'fUOCl'QIIlI ............ :ao...."'-TIVOCL • ~ ~ 10;11. ~ UCU'llllli .,"" ... __ I~"" ",""tU. ~_ 1I~1;IO •• OIPI_~_"oQ_o£Q_, , a-.. __ ...... 101 .... .." n ...... UO ....... -.:oiOUl OIU •• ' .... llll:ll .... ""'nr;~' ... {_"" ... ~ ... ...a-;It<Jo.J..~II"' __ ~'·~.:::..::-:J?m":;:..-:,'::l~~':'~~~ ... I _"'~IJI"'Q _ru ....... _0 , __ .". "' ..... I[ _I~'~ _'" W._w ..... D....-J _nlfl" __ ~ •• IP ...... III: •• fllcro._ , ..... _.u.4"'"' ... [WN1I .. _ .. l_~'Q~"'Ill>_, ~,::~:~~~,":.'l "'&.:.,.'-:f~ ... .;~:..:~~ ...... III_ilt ... >4I .. AllIII:M.L."''''''~1m iUll1""",","III:SUClCCO"" -=r:Jo';' ~':=,=-II~~ ",'_ ... lU I)J ..... Il ~~~~f....:)"""I[""AoUO"'U"'''''UO _ ~ ':'·1 1!i&07 NOR"IHCREEKPAAKWAV N.80THElL. WA iaOll ~ '~ • I ·I~ • J. ~ i I ~ il~ '-' Z gj '" :5 '-' z '" 5 '" 0:: :r u 5 ~ ~ ~~ ~J ;~ ~..:. :!~ ~ ~ ~ ~:i ~~:<~a ii~~i~i ~~IUi ii~ ! I ... H .... NT... r---~ II SHEET I .1 -H' --.... ~ ~ /--."".... ...-1 II 1011 1\ ~ ~.o ------ -------------- J Global Woreless by =F --Mobile- / / o r ,., C) ,., Z o Ie ::xJ m 0 m -< m C ~ < ,. Om -r- c: ::<!~ en ·O~ roo.) "TIm ~~ en ~ ~~ ~ ZZ Z ~ ....,0;;; .. C:LVrMt:1V I I"'LANNING CITY OF RENTON '1'" '.l\~, .. , ;;"7'< It . " •. J'\ ," .",.1, 1 • l liS-.-' ~ •.••• {"'~.' \\" ":It k .l . .I' .. ~:.~ \~" r· .~':.w.~"" i \ ~ . ··~:::t·; '-\....... ( ~ ·..:.: ..... ···1'\ ":: i :, ..... ·!,'I! i~'~' :! ! .... ~~, J. VICINITY MAP NOr'OIiCAlIf .......,..,..., MULTI FAMILY RESIDENTIAl. ............". ---;;,;---~_ --.-J I r-,u·,,' .. , I IIf:G5WOOfl(#HE14C#_1",""''''INilfUnFJ'O~ I , 'H""12·lIIfllllfTT ... ,,,Gl-<1J.<jGE '.'''"fH 1'1 11fT rOllr I, , UtOfIalKlHRD ,"SlY .l.i.GSDnlUlmnn TOP08LEStiCM I A01IHU$COIU) I I I I I"~ I I I: I I I I,' I: I I I =/ ~ I -, I I I j' I ' ",. I '! 'I/~'" I ~ I ' ,(?:; I i, ~;' ;(;:>' MULTIFAMILY RESIDENTIAl I ----~.: !.0:.;J ',~~~l ~ = = ~.-,----/--' ..--- , , I ~ , . " f ii SCHOOL PROPERTY --- -I lr::-~'~ L, /'L ---______ ';"'\ 1')<,'. k ,';;":« 'PN 02923059102 ___ / -----! -'~ -yj::G:,:~'(/: I: ":'<~l /~ -------------~- --'~ ..--- - --- SINGLE FAMilY RESIDENTIAl I I I I i / 1/ , " I I i 'i , I I I I : i '/ j/ : I II:) U1R1H i>OI.E (POiNEA,UtCOUAV\CfSOURCEJ I: t iLJ~> .;.:., A' , \ I __ • :.' , .' I'. OVERALL SITE PLAN , '. '\ 22.lo6SCAlcEl".W I '\1 /"... ~""",~,,: ..... I I .~ b "---.! \ ' / , , I \ ~----I----r----I,-' \,'\L L""'----.:~ ---- AUG 2 6 2005 \ ,------\ \ smH~l _ _ --\-_ ------- I \ -----..;:;,:... r '\ ----- ----1--, ,--------\ ----. \ -------- \-,. ---=--~. 'MOl' MOInMC ....... .., .. .00000000 ...... ,t OFJtea ..... , .. ., .... PRo"Ear .'GRllAnO"_ ~I".' .. R."'UR .. N. SE4663F !NO DIllON RD U,",ON, W" INIOSI '''UIDIJO •• [I ' B~ILDI-Na ;;~M?:l .... " ... 0" KInGRY, I 1'\ I.""'" I"" """,,m ~ ... unroG 811220051S$1J(~ _ loW" .,. .,. 8,1 If,lll'1OO&IISSUtDDESIGNRE\,I:W I BJT PUJlI Pll8P&R&D aYl r B. J. THOMAS, P.E. 7607 60TH AYE NE MARYSVILLE, WA 96270 206·651·1106 [ D ..... WNav,=CHK.OY.:_V· .. 'U I .... I..,r I All I [ L'CI.OURI. .......' I .... \~, ... I .. ~;-~ ..... ~~ ... /S' .. 'It~\:)i ~ \' A' ~ "."~,,,~ ..... ·.;l$~~· .. ~ ... ~ .. I nilirj _'~:G:J EQUIPM.NT, [ VOICE"lRf ...... WIRUE5SNifENNIIS~OC"'TtOON"~9".II· ... GLPOll ..... ffilIlTSIEOUIPI.IUIT .. ..,.EOUlPUEtorT S!1ElTER tlEAR 1l-\E SASE Of TI1E MONOPOI-E DRAWING INFORMATION. [ 00 NOT SC .... E DRAWINGS COI\IlRAC10R froIUST IIE" .. ,,t.L\ OIllOEHS!CftSN'lO iIoOVISf COHSULTNHSOf NtJERAOftS "HDOr,l.SSIONS ,t.LlPRtiVIOUSISSUESOf IluSOfIA.WING "'RESUPER5£DtOIYlt£l""E5IAE\1S1ON TI<f INFORMA11CIH CONT ... J'It'p IN It<1S SElaF OOCuNENT& IS Pf\OPRlElA,flYillNATUfIi: "",yuSEOfIDlSClOIiUR£ OTHEATHAHWI'<ICH I5f1El",rEDTOHloMEOClIfNflS STlilCTLYPROHliIlll:O --:=J] [L_::~ ~ A:~-J Madeline Chaney, AICP Odelia Pacific Corp. 208 Westlake Avenue N Seattle, WA 98109 tel: 425-346-0128 eml: mchaney@odelia.com (applicant / contact) Updated: 09/06/05 PARTIES OF RECORD T -Mobile Monopole LUA05-106, CU-H, ECF First Presbyterian Church of Renton 2640 Benson Road S Renton, WA 98055 tel: 425-221-3491 (owner) \ (Page 1 of 1) • • HEARING EXAMINER'S REPORT • • November 28, 2005 OFFICE OF THE HEARING EXAMINER CITY OF RENTON REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION OWNER: APPLICANT: LOCATION: SUMMARY OF REQUEST: SUMMARY OF ACTION: DEVELOPMENT SERVICES REPORT: PUBLIC HEARING: First Presbyterian Church of Renton 2640 Benson Road S Renton, W A 98055 Madeline Chaney, AICP Odelia Pacific Corp. 208 Westlake Avenue N Seattle, W A 98109 T-Mobile Monopole at First Presbyterian Church LUA-05-106, CU-H, ECF 2640 Benson Road South Conditional Use Permit approval for the installation of an approximately 60-foot tall wireless monopole structure and associated equipment/storage building. Development Services Recommendation: Approve with conditions. The Development Services Report was received by the Examiner on November 8, 2005. After reviewing the Development Services Report, examining available information on file with the application, field checking the property and surrounding area; the Examiner conducted a public hearing on the subject as follows: MINUTES The folio wing minutes are a summary of the November 15, 2005 hearing. The legal record is recorded on CD. The hearing opened on Tuesday, November 15,2005, at 9:00 a.m. in the Council Chambers on the seventh floor of the Renton City Hall. Parties wishing to testify were affirmed by the Examiner. The following exhibits were entered into the record: Exhibit No.1: Yellow file containing the original Exhibit No.2: Neighborhood Detail Map/Zoning application, proof of posting, proof of publication and Map other documentation pertinent to this request. Exhibit No.3: Site Plan Exhibit No.4: Enlarged Site Plan T-Mobile Monopole at lSI pres.ian Church Conditional Use Permit • File No.: LUA-05-106, CU-H, ECF November 28, 2005 Page 2 Exhibit No.5: Site Elevations Exhibit No.6: Enclosure Details Exhibit No.7: Existing Coverage Map Exhibit No.8: Proposed Coverage with the installation of new monopole Exhibit No.9: Photo of Existing conditions looking Exhibit No. 10: Photo Simulation of Proposed SW from Church Parking Lot conditions looking SW from Church Parking Lot Exhibit No. 11: Photo of Existing conditions looking Exhibit No. 12: Photo Simulation of Proposed NW from S 2t" Street conditions looking NW from S 2t" Street The hearing opened with a presentation of the staff report by Jill Ding, Sen ior Planner, Development Services, City of Renton, 1055 S Grady Way, Renton, Washington 98055. The applicant is requesting a conditional use permit approval to install a 59-foot II-inch wireless monopole structure and a 383 square foot storage shed. The proposed monopole would be located on the First Presbyterian Church of Renton site and is located within the R-8 dulac zone. The project is directly east of Benson Road South and north of South 2th Street. Multi-family and single-family residential neighborhoods surround the site, with the exception that Spring Glen Elementary School and Fred Nelsen Middle School are located directly east of the site. The site area is approximately 4 acres in size. The monopole has been designed to resemble a parking lot light fixture. Three antennae would be located within a "RF-friendly radome" at the top of the structure. The proposed monopole would replace an existing pole located on the site. The proposed storage shed would serve a dual purpose. Storage will be provided for the existing church as well as the southern portion of the shed will house the radio based transmitting equipment. The Environmental Review Committee issued a Determination of Non-Significance -Mitigated, with three mitigation measures. There were no appeals. The applicant shall pay a Fire Mitigation Fee. The proposed monopole structure is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan Policies governing the location of new telecommunications facilities. The R-8 development standards require monopole structures to be located 100-feet from all residential zoned properties and must be located on sites greater than I-acre in area. The proposed structures comply with all of the setback, height and landscaping requirements. Besides the monopole being designed to look like a parking lot light fixture, there are numerous tall trees on the site, which will help screen the monopole from other properties nearby. The applicant has not proposed to light and mark the monopole unless it is required by the FAA. If it is required, the applicant will work with the City to have the least intrusive marking and lighting installed. City's landscaping regulations require a 15-foot landscape buffer be installed around the storage shed. The applicant has proposed a reduction from that 15-foot buffer down to a 2-foot buffer with the installation of shrubs around the shed. The shed will also be designed to resemble a residential structure, it would be a stick built shed with pitched roof. Staff approved the reduction. No improvements are required for this project. Madeline Chaney, T-Mobile, 208 Westlake Avenue N., Seattle, WA 98109 stated that they do consent and understand the conditions that have been imposed by the staff. T-Mobile Monopole at 151 Pres bean Church Conditional Use Permit File No.: LUA-05-I 06, CU-H, ECF November 28, 2005 Page 3 • There are no other wireless communication facilities in the area of this project. They did look at all the utility and transmission poles that emanate from the PSE substation near Benson Road. There is a mix of BPA, SCL and PSE poles that are all too high a voltage for their equipment. There were some areas where the equipment could be placed on top of existing buildings, however, the buildings were incapable of holding the weight of the monopole. The coverage issue for this site is for T-Mobile only. In regards to the FAA lighting, they have filed the Form 7460 but have not yet received the determination. It is the opinion oftheir regulatory staff that they will not be required to light the pole. There are conditions in the leasing documents that provide for notice procedures between T-Mobile and the church should there be warranted conditions, removal is an option that both parties can talk about. The Examiner called for further testimony regarding this project. There was no one else wishing to speak, and no further comments from staff. The hearing closed at 9:28 a.m. FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS & RECOMMENDATION Having reviewed the record in this matter, the Examiner now makes and enters the following: FINDINGS: I. The applicant, Madeline Chaney for T-Mobile, filed a request for approval of a Conditional Use Permit to install a monopole for a wireless antenna. 2. The yellow file containing the staff report, the State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA) documentation and other pertinent materials was entered into the record as Exhibit # I. 3. The Environmental Review Committee (ERC), the City's responsible official, issued a Declaration of Non-Significance -Mitigated (DNS-M) for the subject proposal. 4. The subject proposal was reviewed by all departments with an interest in the matter. 5. The subject site is located at 2640 Benson Road South. The proposed tower would be located on property owned and used by First Presbyterian Church of Renton. The site is located on the northeast corner of the intersection of Benson and South 27th Street. 6. The entire church site is approximately 4.02 acres. The subject site is approximately 260 feet wide (east to west) by 7 I 9 feet long. 7. The area contains a mix of single family and multiple family Zoning Districts. The site and properties to its east, south and west are generally single family R-8 Districts. North and northwest are Residential Multi-Family districts (RM-F). Spring Glen Elementary and Fred Nelsen Middle Schools are located east of the subject site on R-8 property. 8. The applicant applied for the Conditional Use Permit to allow a Monopole I structure under the City's Wireless Communications Facilities regulations. The R-8 Zone requires a 15 foot front yard, 20 foot rear yard and 5 foot side yard. A Monopole I structure is permitted in the R-8 Zone ifit is no taller than sixty feet (60') and is setback 100 feet from adjacent residentially zoned property. T-Mobile Monopole at 1st pres.an Church Conditional Use Permit • File No.: LUA-05-106, CU-H, ECF November 28, 2005 Page 4 9. The applicant proposes erecting a 59'11" Monopole I structure along with a 393 square foot accessory equipment and storage building. These structures would be just north of the main church building. The cellular facility would be located more or less centrally on the subject site. It would be set 100 feet from the site's eastern property line at its closest proximity to adjacent property. It would be approximately 140 feet from Benson Road and over 200 feet from the south property line and over 400 feet from the north property line. 10. The monopole has been designed to look like a light pole although the antenna cannot be entirely screened and would be slightly visible near the top. Most of the antenna would be located in the "pole" structure made of a material that would not obstruct radio waves needed for wireless communication. Approximately 24 feet from the ground would be two light fixtures that would complete the camouflage as a lighting pole for the structure. II. The use is not expected to require its own parking space since maintenance would be infrequent and sufficient parking serves the church use. 12. The tower may need a red warning light but that will be determined by the FAA. 13. There are no other nearby towers to provide suitable facilities. 14. The equipment building will be designed with a pitched roof to provide it with the appearance ofa small single-family structure. IS. There are larger trees along the north portion of the property and a row of mature trees along the eastern property line between the site and the school property. The applicant has proposed reducing the required 15 feet of landscaping surrounding the facility to two feet. The church, the major beneficiary of such landscaping has not objected to this reduction. 16. The following Comprehensive Plan policies are applicable to cellular facilities: Policy LV-17S. Landscape buffers, additional setbacks, reduced height, and other screening devices should be employed to reduce the impacts (e.g., visual, noise, odor, light) on adjacent, less intensive uses. Policy LV-18I. Development should be designed to be compatible with adjacent, less intensive uses, e.g., lighting, fences, landscaping, setbacks should all be considered during site design. Policy V-lOO. Require that the site and location of telecommunications facilities be accomplished in a manner that minimizes adverse impacts on the environment and adjacent land uses. Policy V-lOI. Require that cellular communication structures and towers be sensitively sited and designed to diminish aesthetic impacts, and be collocated on existing structures and towers wherever possible and practical. CONCLUSIONS: I. The applicant, for a Conditional Use Permit for a wireless facility must demonstrate that the use is in the public interest, will not impair the health, safety or welfare of the general public and is in compliance T-Mobile Monopole at 1st Presb,8an Church Conditional Use Permit File No.: LUA-05-1 06, CU-H, E'f!!r' • November 28, 2005 Page 5 with the criteria found in Section 4-2-080 and other sections covering conditional uses which provide in part that: a. The tower's height meets the limitations of the site's zoning with allowance for the cellular exception; b. The use is appropriately separated from residential uses; c. The affect on adjacent property; d. The surrounding topography is appropriate for the location; e. The buffering aspects of surrounding tree cover and foliage; f. The design reduces the overall intrusiveness; g. Ingress and egress is appropriate; h. The impacts of noise, light and glare; I. Alternate existing support structures; and J. Compatibility with the standards of the Comprehensive Plan. The requested conditional use appears justified for a Monopole I not greater than 60 feet tall. 2. The R-8 zone permits 35-foot height limits with Monopole I structures permitted up to 60 feet tall. The proposed monopole is just under 60-feet tall, at 59 feet 11 inches. 3. There is an approximately 100 foot separation between the proposed tower and its closest 1{-8 neighbor, the school property to the east. 4. There is forested property to the north, a row of trees to the east and the church to the south providing separation and screening for the facility. Illustrative images indicate that the use should be minimally intrusive. The applicant proposes to reduce the immediate screening and apparently the lessor church has agreed. 5. The monopole is designed to look like a light standard including shoebox fixtures although it might be considered somewhat tall. But the "disguise" should help it blend in to the church use and parking area. 6. As noted, it will not be a large traffic generator. There would be construction traffic and occasional maintenance traffic. The site provides sufficient parking to meet any demands the use might generate. 7. There are no nearby towers that can provide suitable facilities. 8. In summary, the proposed use appears appropriate for this location and designed to fit in this area. DECISION: The Conditional Use Permit is approved subject to the following conditions: T-Mobile Monopole at 1 st Pre-ian Church Conditional Use Permit • File No.: LUA-05-1 06, CU-H:~ November 28, 2005 Page 6 I. The applicant shall be required to construct the Monopole I structure to resemble a parking lot light fixture. 2 The applicant shall be required to work with the City to select the least intrusive lighting for the Monopole I structure, should the FAA require obstruction lighting. 3. The applicant shall be required to construct the proposed 383 square foot storage shed as a stick built structure resembling a residential structure with a pitched roof. 4. The applicant shall comply with the conditions imposed by the ERe. ORDERED THIS 28th day of November 2005. FRED J. KA HEARING EX TRANSMITTED THIS 28th day of November 2005 to the parties of record: Jill Ding 1055 S Grady Way Renton, WA 98055 First Presbyterian Church of Renton 2640 Benson Road S Madeline Chaney, AICP Odelia Pacific Corp. Renton, W A 98055 208 Westland Avenue N Seattle, WA 98109 TRANSMITTED THIS 28th day of November 2005 to the following: Mayor Kathy Keolker-Wheeler Jay Covington, Chief Administrative Officer Julia Medzegian, Council Liaison Larry Warren, City Attorney Gregg Zimmerman, PBPW Administrator Alex Pietsch, Economic Development Jennifer Henning, Development Services Stacy Tucker, Development Services Stan Engler, Fire Larry Meckling, Building Official Planning Commission Transportation Division Utilities Division Neil Watts, Development Services Janet Conklin, Development Services King County Journal Pursuant to Title IV, Chapter 8, Section 100(G) of the City's Code, request for reconsideration must be filed in writing on or before 5:00 p.m., December 12, 2005. Any aggrieved person feeling that the decision of the Examiner is ambiguous or based on erroneous procedure, errors of law or fact, error in judgment, or the discovery of new evidence which could not be reasonably available at the prior hearing may make a written request for a review by the Examiner within fourteen (14) days from the date of the Examiner's decision. This request shall set forth the specific ambiguities or errors discovered by such appellant, and the Examiner may, after review of the record, take further action as he deems proper. An appeal to the City Council is governed by Title IV, Chapter 8, Section 110, which requires that such appeal be filed with the City Clerk, accompanying a filing fee of$75.00 and meeting other specified requirements. T-Mobile Monopole at \ sl pres.an Church Conditional Use Permit File No.: LUA-05-\ 06, CU-H, Prl November 28, 2005 Page 7 • Copies of this ordinance are available for inspection or purchase in the Finance Department, first floor of City Hall. An appeal must be filed in writing on or before 5:00 p.m., December 12,2005. If the Examiner's Recommendation or Decision contains the requirement for Restrictive Covenants, the executed Covenants will be required prior to approval by City Councilor final processing of the file. You may contact this office for information on formatting covenants. The Appearance of Fairness Doctrine provides that no ex parte (private one-on-one) communications may occur concerning pending land use decisions. This means that parties to a land use decision may not communicate in private with any decision-maker concerning the proposal. Decision-makers in the land use process include both the Hearing Examiner and members of the City Council. All communications concerning the proposal must be made in public. This public communication permits all interested parties to know the contents of the communication and would allow them to openly rebut the evidence. Any violation of this doctrine would result in the invalidation of the request by the Court. The Doctrine applies not only to the initial public hearing but to all Requests for Reconsideration as well as Appeals to the City Council. ~M-F R-8 R-8 R-8 ~ en I~ .oe::C ~ ~ en Q) ,..... > oe::C 172nd St. 14 .. 32 T23N RSE W 112 ~ ZONING o ~ UCBNICAL BBIlVlCl!8 - - - -a-toD at;, UmJt.o H4 29 T23N R5E W 1/2 .. . .. '~ :- ~ VICINITY MAP -.. -. ---- - ... _- .... OCIIlor., ....... u.nt,"' .. \MI • .,.,,"toPCIII TM .... ' ... _nTM ........ ' .... nftl .. '.ft"fO .. ; lIIOI~IIIDTMIU ..... lI.'UIlm.n"to""'IA.a. AGft ..... COJlO MIll TI F ..... Y AaSIDII<TW. -----------------..-? ----- t----;.....-_l/ / / I, I' .... '· , I '/ I I /1 (' I , I I' I ' I /' I' , , SlNCll.E FAMILY RESIDENT .... , , ! I 'i SCHOOl PROPERTY IlI"NIII.Ho~O' #Jk· ... II ..... 'I'OCU' ......... ~tflll III' etn,M'OA ... TlII on ...... ! ")lrIlGLHUlllClNO'<Ul.·, #J4"~~~III~Mt2I .. ," .•• II'IrM~'UCOflOl.ltM"hl.1 I",nLlf'''''''' 1'OI'II".1t\C<I"IMO·~1 1I10t4Uft.n"1' -'" ..... , "I;''''UN AUG 2 6 2005 I I :! " I :i \ :i __ _ ___ ~ __ '\ ' \ --I _, ____ _ I \ ~ L .... --f ~ _ \ ' u.._____ .... :;.:....-_ _ ___ _ I \ \ _ .. ~_~11_" __ \ \ ----1-\ -'-1 ~ . . ..,....,....... ....... ..".....A~1 ............. ,.. """'.err •• N80N RD/CHURCH MP 8.411U ......... OftIlO .. ..,OIII,W ...... ~t'.' (?i~') "-!~~~ .. ~_.~.4 ~ociiJ 'I'OCI.tfNiMl~ .. NftDlllM .. ClCAtIllOJillA .... I'· o\OL"""'wnhlft.o...wlrt"M'~ .... l'''I.NIMTtC .... CW,.''1ifONaIIIQ,1 ---------------------DEVELOPMENT PLANNING II1II CITY OF RENTON ~ -# cr ~ c;- AUG 262005 'r .... ..... ~.! . "~"tlAI J:~-:(~8 11"'*""""110 'IO£IlfMNIIIlOl :..I-b-W CdIfTMIDlA"-OOIII l;;;:rn 'NO' t'I , TO~ ft~WO::O WAlllllCll.lf'CO r----_HI ,t·,· "-....... -'" <: t~ ..... I I : :. n------------~ I I "TIlt I I I I.~-It '-r-'-~ I ~ I I , -, 40 oW I I J "'_0001II r .. · .. '. lOTTo." ... ,. @m 'NCLOWS' PLM "'I~,,,J"""" BTS INCLOeURI ® INTIRIOR ILlYATION A4 .toCo1IiLI: lliII'., ... . _-''''''.''·Ot. • ",CQIrIIIIIO&ITIO IMINCILIt _ ...... -.. ·~J'·r' .X "'1'""::''1'.:.'''-...t...,.. I. ....., •• MlOD'#lCjf 1A1. 1---'----1 i:'= 1-' --~ ;::'~I'LlHL'OIl Ir •• ·~ -"~,.i-~U:1" "'ltIOI.llOOltU COMCllllftllAl_ !::!.IJ"oe,...cr. BTS INCLOIURI @ fRAMING PITAIL -.., ICN.&:,," .,.. ... wooo COMtl"''''' """'''"""",,'' trr. ... ,O" • .....cuj ~ .. --+- BTl INCLOeURI ® IUT ILlYATION 14:"".: .. " " t'OHf""'OV ..... 1,MI1JrIUtiI cun'"rn" @ 'OOTING DITAIL .... , Itfl. 11~~.b, SiDl'tCltollUfCM flllf-..:f\IAI BTl INCLOeURI ® NORTH ILlYATlOH M "-,:"" ................................ ] .......... . .-.t.... aTS INCLOIURI " ........ "". @ win ILlYATlON A..a fC,IU:"" BTS INCLOeURI @IOUTH ILIVATION Aol ICAi.I,HT' eor.vt"I~~""1tMJ1IQ .... ·.'"COWOM'OI'"'I'tOI. •• C~~ .ltU.fIOCWtMO."LI .1·1'f"l.ntIOOO"'A~ "".Itft\II.r.(n,ll,.OIolXW """'II' ,,,,,,,,rc,,J.·OC PTV!1CIIIII1WiU.. ."lrl"~M ... tI".lt'T\NOICIHd .1'~'.'CUOl'l'MJI.:'JUtI~ . I ,r tDA .. ~ n¥OOO "",,·IIIfOOOIl\IOfA.t ,r01: _ "" , .... , ton()ll,l I'U.flAfCllflr •• 'TOI'fIU.'" ---~ . . -., .............. . ~ ...... 't .".. ttl., ... ,.. •• ~"·f,~~~, •• fl •• : tfv",,"1;;/-,t. { 11l'j) •• ~~~:~! •• Q~!~~~~"FD / / • TEASDAL&K SE4667 2640 BENSON RD RENTON. WA 98055 PROPOSED PHOTO #1 1960! N01'1 CfCC~ P;" ~W<.li I\orth Roche:! Was"~191c" 9R') 11 F,.,,~"N,= .;;.~_ l;.~ .. r t ... .c .:~:. :lo -:: "' . --CITY OF RENTON • DETERMm'ATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE-MITIGATED MITIGATION MEASURES APPLICATION NO(S): LUA05-10S, CU-H, ECF APPLICANT: Madeline Chaney, Odelia Pacific Corp. PROJECT NAME: T -Mobile Monopole at 1 sl Presbyterian Church DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSAL: Applicant proposes to install a 59-foot 11-inch Monopole 1 structure with an associated storage shed/equipment shelter on the south-central portion of a 4.02-acre parcel. The subject site is located within the Residential - 8 dwelling unit per acre zoning designation and is currently developed with the First Presbyterian Church of Renton. The proposed monopole structure would be constructed as a 24-inch diameter, dark bronze pole structure designed to have the appearance of a parking lot light. LOCATION OF PROPOSAL: LEAD AGENCY: MITIGATION MEASURES: 2640 Benson Road S The City of Renton Department of Planning/Building/Public Works Development Planning Section 1. The applicant shall comply with the recommendations provided in the geotechnical report prepared by LSI Adapt, Inc. dated August 24, 2005. 2. The applicant shall complete the FAA 74S0-A form and submit it to the FAA. A copy of the FAA's approval shall be provided to the Development Services Division Project Manager prior to issuance of a building permit. The proposed monopole shall be lit and marked if the FAA requires it. 3. The applicant shall pay a fire mitigation fee in the amount of $0.52 per square foot for the construction of the new storage shed/equipment shelter. ERe Mitigation Measures Page 1 of 1 STATE OF WASHINGTON, COUNTY OF KING } AFFIDA VIT OF PUBLICATION PUBLIC NOTICE Tom Meagher, being first duly sworn on oath that he is the Legal Advertising Representative of the King County Journal a daily newspaper, which newspaper is a legal newspaper of general circulation and is now and has been for more than six months prior to the date of publication hereinafter referred to, published in the English language continuously as a daily newspaper in King County, Washington. The King County Journal has been approved as a Legal Newspaper by order of the Superior Court of the State of Washington for King County. The notice in the exact form annexed was published in regular issues of the King County Journal (and not in supplement form) which was regularly distributed to its subscribers during the below stated period. The annexed notice, a Public Notice was published on November 4,2005. The full amount of the fee charged for said foregoing publication is the sum of $78.00. ,'III' ciJ \\\\ "" ~ ;JOS)"'" OTA.~l'O~ ~..., ~ ,. ~~ ~"~'!t.~<&.1 \...-.!A h.11~ Tom Meagher : EXP. : Legal Advertising Representative, King County Journal : ~ 04/28/2~9 ~ ~ Subscribed and sworn to me this 4th day of November, 200S; ~~' {$) E ~:~ ~\C 6"'-~ ~ '" 0 ..,....~~ :;> -"11 'P \lVAS\"':~\'~ IJ"~'t""\'\ Jo . Barton Notary Public for the State of Washington, Residing in Auburn, Washington PO Number: Cost of publishing this notice includes an affidavit surcharge. NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING RENTON HEARING EXAMINER RENTON, WASHINGTON A Public Hearing will be held by the Renton Hearing Examiner in the Council Chambers on the seventh floor of Renton City Hall, 1055 South Grady Way, Renton, Washington, on November 15, 2005 at 9:00 AM to con- sider the following petitions: T-Mobile Monopole at 1st Presbyterian Church LUA05-106, CU-H, ECF Location: 2640 Benson Road S .. Description: Applicant proposes to install a 59-foot ll-inch Monopole 1 structure with an associated storage shed/equipment shelter on the south-central portion of a 4.02-acre parcel. The subject site is located within the Residential- 8 dwelling unit per acre zoning designation and is currently developed with the First Pres- byterian Church of Renton. The proposed monopole structure would be constructed as a 24-inch diameter, dark bronze pole structure designed to have the appearance of a parking lot light. All interested persons are invited to be present at the Public Hearing to express their opinions. Questions should be directed to the Hearing Examiner at 425-430-6515. Published in the King County Journal November 4, 2005. #849866 , , • • ,. "":: ,": . ::-',::: :-::/":::~::::':." ",.: .. . . ... .. .... . .~:.. :i.::"". To: Gregg Zimmerman, Planning/Building/Public Works Administrator Dennis Culp, Community Services Administrator Lee Wheeler, Fire Chief From: Jennifer Henning, Development Planning ,,~~~~ng Date: . ,:~~6s,~~' •• ·.9Ctope'~"'1··~, •• ·2(i()$' •• '·':·':".'·:'::.':·:.".;.;:ij:·'."';:ii;:,i:i:'!'·.':',"' ......... ,', .... , . Location: 'Sixth FI()p(:¢c:>nf~~e[lc~ Agenda listed below. Safewav Fuel Station #1468 -(Discussion only) (Weaver) LUA05-1 01, SA-A, ECF The applicant is requesting Environmental (SEPA) Review and Administrative Site Plan approval for the construction of a fueling station located at the existing Safeway store center at 4300 NE 4th Street. The proposal would include a 4,365 sq. ft. canopy with a 464 sq. ft. kiosk, in an area currently used for store parking. Four fueling dispensers and two underground tanks are proposed, with associated parkin~, landscaping, and utility improvements. The site is zoned Commercial Arterial (CA) and is located within the 4 Street Commercial Corridor and Business District Overlays. The site is located in Aquifer Protection Zone 2. A 60 to 90 day construction schedule is estimated. T-Mobi/e Monopole at 1st Presbyterian Church (Ding) LUA05-106, CU-H, ECF Applicant proposes to install a 59-foot 11-inch Monopole 1 structure with an associated storage shed/equipment shelter on the south-central portion of a 4.02-acre parcel. The subject site is located within the Residential - 8 dwelling unit per acre zoning designation and is currently developed with the First Presbyterian Church of Renton. The proposed monopole structure would be constructed as a 24-inch diameter, dark bronze pole structure designed to have the appearance of a parking lot light. cc: K. Keolker-Wheeler, Mayor J. Covington, Chief Administrative Officer A. Pietsch, EDNSP Administrator ® B. Wolters, EDNSP Director ® J. Gray, Fire Prevention N. Watts, P/B/PW Development Services Director ® F. Kaufman, Hearing Examiner S. Engler, Fire Prevention ® J. Medzegian, Council S. Meyer, P/B/PW Transportation Systems Director R. Lind, Economic Development L. Warren, City Attorney ® --CITY OF RENTON CURRENT PLANNING DIVISION AFFIDAVIT OF SERVICE BY MAILING On the 8th day of November, 2005, I deposited in the mails of the United States, a sealed envelope containing Preliminary Report to the Hearing Examiner documents. This information was sent to: Name Madeline Chaney, Odelia Pacific Corp. 1st Presbyterian Church of Renton (Signature of Sender):~ C\ ~ STATE OF WASHINGTON ) SS COUNTY OF KING ) Contact Owner I certify that I know or have satisfactory evidence that Stacy Tucker Representing signed this instrument and acknowledged it to be his/her/their free and voluntary act for the uses and purposes mentioned in the instrument. Dated:_-:....:.II-+/.....::..1..!...I_os~_ Notary (Print): My appointment expires: II ~" .. ,~" "' ....... ~ ,: :~p~(jj~ct Name:/. T-Mobile Monopole at 1st Presbyterian Church "\,:..;;J IV tl _-"""''"--- Prdje~t Number: LUA05-106, CU-H, ECF -. .~--~ ~ , ...:' COMMENCING AT 9:00 AM, CITY OF RENTON HEARING EXAMINER PUBLIC HEARING November 15, 2005 AGENDA COUNCIL CHAMBERS, 7TH FLOOR, RENTON CITY HALL The application(s) listed are in order of application number only and not necessarily the order in which they will be heard. Items will be called for hearing at the discretion of the Hearing Examiner. PROJECT NAME: T -Mobile Monopole at 151 Presbyterian Church PROJECT NUMBER: LUA-05-106, CU-H, ECF PROJECT DESCRIPTION: The applicant is requesting Conditional Use Permit approval for the installation of an approximately 60-foot tall wireless monopole structure and associated equipment/storage building for the purpose of enhancing cell phone service in the project vicinity. The monopole would be disguised as a light pole. The subject site is 4.02 acres (175,111 square feet) in area and is located within the Residential-8 dwelling unit per acre zoning designation. The monopole and equipment/storage building would be located within the south-central portion of the subject site and is a minimum of 100 feet from other residentially zoned properties. Access to the monopole and equipment/storage building would be provided via an existing driveway directly onto Benson Road S. HEX Agenda 11-15-05 PUBLIC HEARING City of Renton Department of Planning / Building / Public Works PRELIMINARY REPORT TO THE HEARING EXAMINER A. SUMMARY AND PURPOSE OF REQUEST: Public Hearing Date: Project Name: Owner Address: Applicant Address: File Number: Project Description: Project Location: R-8 November 15, 2005 T -Mobile Monopole at 1 st Presbyterian Church Conditional Use Permit First Presbyterian Church of Renton 2640 Benson Road S Renton, WA 98055 Madeline Chaney, AICP Odelia Pacific Corp. 208 Westland Avenue N Seattle, WA 98109 LUA05-106, CU-H, ECF Project Manager: Jill K. Ding The applicant is requesting Conditional Use Permit approval for the installation of an approximately 60-foot tall wireless monopole structure and associated equipmenVstorage building for the purpose of enhancing cell phone service in the project vicinity. The monopole would be disguised as a light pole. The subject site is 4.02 acres (175,111 square feet) in area and is located within the Residential-8 dwelling unit per acre zoning deSignation. The monopole and equipmenVstorage building would be located within the south-central portion of the subject site and is a minimum of 100 feet from other residentially zoned properties. Access to the monopole and equipmenVstorage building would be provided via an existing driveway directly onto Benson Road S. 2640 Benson Road S ~M-F ~. R-8 City of Renton PIBIPW Department __ T-Mobi/e Monopole at 1"1 Presbyterian Church Meliminary Report to the Hearing Examiner LUA05-106, CU-H, ECF PUBLIC HEARING DA TE November 15, 2005 Page20f2 B. EXHIBITS: 1. 2. 3. 4. Exhibit 1: Project file ("yellow file") containing the application, reports, staff comments, and other material pertinent to the review of the project. Exhibit 2: Neighborhood Detail Map/Zoning Map sheet H4 (dated December 28,2004) Exhibit 3: Site Plan, sheet A-1 (dated August 11,2005) Exhibit 4: Enlarged Site Plan, sheet A-1.1 (dated August 11,2005) Exhibit 5: Site Elevations, sheet A-2 (dated August 11,2005) Exhibit 6: Enclosure Details, sheet A-3 (dated August 11,2005) Exhibit 7: Existing Coverage map Exhibit 8: Proposed Coverage with the installation of new monopole Exhibit 9: Photo of Existing conditions looking SW from Church Parking Lot Exhibit 10: Photo Simulation of Proposed conditions looking SW from Church Parking Lot Exhibit 11: Photo of Exiting conditions looking NW from S 27'h Street Exhibit 12: Photo Simulation of Proposed conditions looking NW from S 27'h Street c. GENERAL INFORMATION: Owner of Record: Zoning Designation: Comprehensive Plan Land Use Designation: Existing Site Use: First Presbyterian Church of Renton 2640 Benson Road S Renton, W A 98055 Residential - 8 dwelling units per acre (R-8) Residential Single Family (RSF) Church 5. Neighborhood Characteristics: 6. Access: 7. Site Area: hexrpt.doc North: Residential Multi-Family (RM-F) zoning East: Spring Glen Elementary and Fred Nelsen Middle School, Residential - 8 dwelling unit per acre (R-8) zoning South: Residential - 8 dwelling unit per acre (R-8) zoning West: Residential - 8 dwelling unit per acre (R-8) zoning/Residential Multi- Family (RM-F) zoning Benson Road S 175,111 sq. ft. (4.01 acres) City of Renton P/B/PW Department __ T-Mobi/e Monopole at 1st Presbyterian Church Meliminary Report to the Hearing Examiner LUA05-106, CU-H, ECF PUBLIC HEARING DATE November 15, 2005 Page30f3 Area Comments 8. Project Data: Existing Building Area: 10,899 sf Existing church New Building Area: 383 sq. ft. New monopole and storage shed Total Building Area: 11,282 sf N/A D. HISTORICAUBACKGROUND: Action Annexation Comprehensive Plan Zoning Land Use File No. NIA NIA N/A Ordinance No. 1909 5099 5100 Date 09/1211961 11/01/2004 11/01/2004 E. APPLICABLE SECTIONS OF THE RENTON MUNICIPAL CODE: 1. Chapter 2 Land Use Districts Section 4-2-020: Purpose and Intent of Zoning Districts Section 4-2-070: Zoning Use Table Section 4-2-110: Residential Development Standards 2. Chapter 4 Property Development Standards Section 4-4-030: Development Guidelines and Regulations Section 4-4-060: Grading, Excavation and Mining Regulations Section 4-4-080: Parking, Loading and Driveway Regulations 4. Chapter 6 Streets and Utility Standards 5. Chapter 9 Procedures and Review Criteria 6. Chapter 11 Definitions F. APPLICABLE SECTIONS OF THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN: 1. Land Use Element: Residential Single Family objectives and policies. 2. Utilities Element G. DEPARTMENT ANAL YSIS: 1. PROJECT DESCRIPTION/BACKGROUND hexrpt.doc The applicant is requesting a Hearing Examiner Conditional Use Permit approval in order to construct a 59-foot 11-inch wireless monopole structure and a 383 square foot storage shed. The proposed monopole is classified as a Monopole I per RMC 4-11-240M. Three antennae would be located inside an "RF-friendly" "radome" at the tope of the support structure, hiding them from view. As the antennae must be mechanically down-tilted to a position that exceeds the diameter of the support structure, a portion of the radome would be left open and the antennae would be visible. The visible portion of the antennae would be painted dark bronze to match the color of the support structure. Two shoebox-style parking lot lights, also bronze in color, are proposed to be mounted to the pole at a position 24 feet above ground level. These lights would replace an existing light fixture that is currently mounted on a wood pole at approximately the same location. Associated radio base transmitting system (BTS) equipment would be located within a new 383 square foot outbuilding that would also serve as a storage shed for the First Presbyterian Church City of Renton P/B/PW Department e T-Mobi/e Monopole at 1st Presbyterian Church eeliminal}' Report to the Hearing Examiner LUA05-106, CU-H, ECF PUBLIC HEARING DA TE November 15, 2005 Page 4 of4 of Renton. Emerald green arborvitae are proposed to be planted around the perimeter of the storage shed to further screen the shed from view. Protected slope areas (slopes with a grade greater than 40%) and moderate landslide hazard areas are mapped on the subject site. 2. ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW The proposed monopole structure was subject to Environmental (SEPA) Review due to the project's location within a residential zoning designation. Pursuant to the City of Renton's Environmental Ordinance and SEPA (RCW 43.21 C, 1971 as amended) on October 18, 2005 the Environmental Review Committee (ERG) issued a Determination of Non-Significance -Mitigated (DNS-M) for the project. The DNS-M included 3 mitigation measures. A 14-day appeal period commenced on October 24,2005 and ended on November 7,2005. No appeals of the threshold determination were filed. 3. COMPLIANCE WITH ERC MITIGATION MEASURES Based on an analysis of probable impacts from the proposal, the Environmental Review Committee (ERG) issued the following mitigation measures with the Determination of Non- Significance -Mitigated: 1. The applicant shall comply with the recommendations provided in the geotechnical report prepared by LSI Adapt, Inc. dated August 24, 2005. 2. The applicant shall complete the FAA 7460-A form and submit it to the FAA. A copy of the FAA's approval shall be provided to the Development Services Division Project Manager prior to issuance of a building permit. The proposed monopole shall be lit and marked if the FAA requires it. 3. The applicant shall pay a fire mitigation fee in the amount of $0.52 per square foot for the construction of the new storage shed/equipment shelter. 4. STAFF REVIEW COMMENTS Representatives from various city departments have reviewed the application materials to identify and address site plan issues from the proposed development. These comments are contained in the official file, and the essence of the comments has been incorporated into the appropriate sections of this report and the Departmental Recommendation at the end of the report. 5. CONSISTENCY WITH CONDITIONAL USE CRITERIA: hexrpt.doc Section 4-9-030.G lists 11 criteria that the Hearing Examiner is asked to consider, along with all other relevant information, in making a decision on a Conditional Use application. These include the following: (1) CONSISTENCY WITH THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN, ZONING CODE & OTHER ORDINANCES: The proposed use shall be compatible with the general purpose, goals, objectives and standard of the Comprehensive Plan, the Zoning Ordinance and any other plan, program, map or ordinance of the City of Renton. (a) Comprehensive Plan Land Use Element The subject site is designated Residential Single Family (RSF) on the City's Comprehensive Plan Land Use Map. The purpose of the Residential Single Family designation is to allow for quality residential detached development organized into neighborhoods at urban densities. It is intended that larger subdivision, infill development, and rehabilitation of existing housing be carefully designed to enhance and improve the quality of Single family living environments. The following Comprehensive Plan policies are applicable to the proposal: City of Renton P/B/PW Department _ T-Mobi/e Monopole at 1Bt Presbyterian Church eeliminal}' Report to the Hearing Examiner LUA05-106, CU-H, ECF PUBLIC HEARING DATE November 15, 2005 PageS of5 hexrpt.doc Objective U-J: Promote the timely and orderly expansion of all forms of telecommunications services within the City and the remainder of its Planning Area. The information submitted by the applicant indicates that cellular services in the vicinity of the subject site is currently lacking. The proposed monopole would add cellular service to an area that currently does not have service or the service provided is very poor. Policy U-100. Require that the siting and location of telecommunications facilities be accomplished in a manner that minimizes adverse impacts on the environment and adjacent land uses. The proposed monopole structure and the storage shed would be located outside of any mapped sensitive areas on the subject property and is located a minimum of 100 feet from all property lines. Policy U-101. Require that cellular communication structures and towers be sensitively sited and designed to diminish aesthetic impacts, and be collocated on existing structures and towers wherever possible and practical. The applicant has proposed to locate the monopole structure on an existing church property that is 4.02 acres in area and is forested on the northern portion of the subject site and contains a row of mature trees along the eastern property line. In addition, the proposed monopole would be designed to resemble a light pole and would replace an existing light pole at the proposed location. Adequate space will be provided within the proposed monopole structure to allow for the future collocation of other wireless service providers. No intrusive lighting or marking is proposed unless obstruction lighting is required by the FAA, in that instance the applicant has indicated they would work with the City of Renton to have the least intrusive lighting installed. (b) Zoning Code The proposed church use is located within the Residential - 8 dwelling unit per acre (R-8) zoning designation. The purpose of the Residential - 8 dwelling unit per acre zone (R-8) is to provide areas single family residential dwellings allowing a range of four (4) to eight (8) dwelling units per net acre. The proposed church use would be permitted in the R-8 zone subject to approval of a Hearing Examiner Conditional Use Permit. (c) Development Standards The Residential - 8 dwelling unit per acre (R-8) development standards require a minimum front yard setback (Benson Road S) and side yard along a street (S 27'h Street) of 15 feet for the primary structure and 20 feet for an attached garage, a side yard setback of 5 feet, and a rear yard setback of 20 feet. In addition, a 100 foot setback is required for Monopole I structures from any residential zoned property per RMC 4-2- 080A.45. The proposed structures comply with all of the setback requirements. In addition, RMC 4-2-080A.45 requires that the monopole structure be located on a parcel that is greater than 1 acre in area. The subject site is 4.02 acres in area; therefore the size of the subject site is adequate for the siting of a monopole structure. The maximum building lot coverage permitted in the R-8 zone for lots greater than 5,000 square feet in area is 2,500 square feet of 35%, whichever is greater. The current building footprint of the existing church building is approximately 9,657 square feet, and the building footprint of the proposed storage shed would be 383 square feet, which equates to a building lot coverage of 5.7% (building footprint of 10,040 square feet / lot size of 175,111 square feet = 5.7%), which complies with the building lot coverage requirements. City of Renton P/BIPW Department e T-Mobile Monopole at 1st Presbyterian Church eeliminaty Report to the Hearing Examiner LUA05-106, CU-H, ECF PUBLIC HEARING DATE November 15, 2005 Page 60f6 hexrpt.doc The maximum building height permitted in the R-8 zone is 2 stories and 30 feet. The proposed storage shed is proposed to be 10 feet 4 inches in height, which complies with the maximum building height requirements. The maximum height permitted for a Monopole I structure is 60 feet. The proposed Monopole I structure is 59 feet 11 inches, which complies with the maximum height requirement for Monopole I structures. (2) COMMUNITY NEED: There shall be a community need for the proposed use at the proposed location. In the determination of community need, the Hearing Examiner shall consider the following factors, among all other relevant information: (a) The proposed location shall not result in either the detrimental over concentration of a particular use within the City or within the immediate area of the proposed use. The immediate vicinity of the subject site is primarily surrounded by single family and multi family uses, in addition Spring Glen Elementary and Fred Nelsen Middle School are located directly east of the subject site. There are no other wireless communication facilities or collocatable facilities in the immediate vicinity, therefore the proposed monopole would not result in a detrimental over concentration of a Monopole I use in the area. The proposed Monopole I structure is not expected to dramatically increase noise, odor, traffic, or produce other adverse impacts to surrounding properties. (b) That the proposed location is suited for the proposed use. The application materials indicate that there are no other wireless communication facilities in the project vicinity, nor are there any collocatable facilities in the vicinity. The applicant has provided materials to show that other more suitable sites were evaluated and found to be problematic before the subject site was identified as a potential location. The proposed Monopole I structure would be designed and constructed to have the appearance of a parking lot light fixture to minimize adverse impacts to the surrounding properties. In addition, the proposed Monopole I structure would be setback a minimum of 100 feet from adjacent residentially zoned properties and would be screened from view by the existing trees located on the subject site. The applicant is not proposing the light and mark the monopole structure unless required by the FAA. In the event the FAA does require obstruction lighting and marking, the applicant has indicated that they would work with the City of Renton to install the least intrusive lighting. Due to the difficulty in finding alternate sites and the proposed parking lot light fixture design to mitigation adverse impacts from adjacent properties, the proposed location is suitable for the proposed use. Staff recommends a condition of approval to require the applicant to design the Monopole I structure to look like a parking lot light fixture. (3) EFFECT ON ADJACENT PROPERTIES: The proposed use at the proposed location shall not result in SUbstantial or undue adverse effects on adjacent property. The following site requirements shall be required: (a) Lot Coverage: Lot coverage shall conform to the requirements of zone in which the proposed use is to be located. The maximum building lot coverage permitted in the R-8 zone for lots greater than 5,000 square feet in area is 2,500 square feet of 35%, whichever is greater. The current building footprint of the existing church building is approximately 9,657 square feet, and the building footprint of the proposed storage shed would be 383 square feet, which equates to a building lot coverage of 5.7% (building footprint of 10,040 square feet / lot size of 175,111 square feet = 5.7%), which complies with the building lot coverage requirements. City ot Renton P/BIPW Department _ T-Mobile Monopole at 1st Presbyterian Church eeliminaty Report to the Hearing Examiner LUA05-106, CU-H, ECF PUBLIC HEARING DATE November 15, 2005 Page 70t7 hexrpt.doc (b) Yards: Yards shall conform to the requirements of the zone in which the proposed use is to be located. Additions to the structure shall not be allowed in any required yard. (c) The Residential - 8 dwelling unit per acre (R-8) development standards require a minimum front yard setback (Benson Road S) and side yard along a street (S 27'h Street) of 15 feet for the primary structure and 20 feet for an attached garage, a side yard setback of 5 feet, and a rear yard setback of 20 feet. In addition, a 100 foot setback is required from any residential zoned property per RMC 4-2-080A.45. The proposed structures comply with all of the setback requirements. (d) Height: Building and structure heights shall conform to the requirements of the zone in which the proposed use is to be located. Spires, bell towers, public utility antennas or similar structure may exceed the height requirement upon approval of a variance. Building heights should be related to surrounding used in order to allow optimal sunlight and ventilation, and minimal obstruction of views from adjacent structures. The maximum building height permitted in the R-8 zone is 2 stories and 30 feet. The proposed storage shed is proposed to be 10 feet 4 inches in height, which complies with the maximum building height requirements. The maximum height permitted for a Monopole I structure is 60 feet. The proposed Monopole I structure is 59 feet 11 inches, which complies with the maximum height requirement for Monopole I structures. (4) CaMPA TlBILlTY: The subject property is located within a predominantly single family and multi family residential area with the Spring Glen Elementary and Fred Nelsen Middle School located to the east of the subject site. The proposed Monopole I structure would be located a minimum of 100 feet from any residentially zoned properties, in addition the structure would be screened by existing mature trees located on the subject site, and the applicant has proposed to design the Monopole I structure lot resemble a parking lot light fixture to enhance the compatibility with the monopole and the surrounding residential areas. (5) PARKING: The applicant has indicated that under normal conditions one or two technician visits per month would be anticipated. No additional parking is proposed Monopole I structure as the applicant indicates that the existing 66 onsite parking spaces available at the First Presbyterian church would be adequate for the technician visits. The City's parking regulations do not specify the number of parking spaces required for the installation of a Monopole I structure, however the parking regulations provide that for uses not identified the Planning/Building/Public Works Administrator may determine the number of parking spaces required. The Planning/Building/Public Works Administrator has review the application materials and concurs with the applicant's conclusion that the existing onsite parking spaces provided for the church would be adequate for the technician visits. (6) TRAFFIC: Traffic and circulation patterns of vehicles and pedestrians relating to the proposed use and surrounding area shall be reviewed for potential effects on, and to ensure safe movement in the surrounding area. The southern property line of the subject site fronts on S 27'h Street and the western property line fronts on Benson Road S. As previously stated the construction of the proposed Monopole I structure would necessitate under normal conditions one or two technician visits per month. Therefore, traffic and pedestrian circulation patterns on and around the subject site are not anticipated to be impacted by the proposal. (7) NOISE, GLARE: Potential noise, light and glare impacts shall be evaluated based on the location of the proposed use on the lot and the location of on-site parking areas, outdoor recreational areas and refuse storage areas. City of Renton P/B/PW Department e T-Mobile Monopole at 1st Presbyterian Church eeliminary Report to the Hearing Examiner LUA05-106, CU-H, ECF PUBLIC HEARING DATE November 15, 2005 PageBofB hexrpt.doc The applicant indicates that the Monopole I structure would rely on batteries in the event of a power failure, rather than a backup generator and will comply with the City's noise regulations. The height and location of the proposed structure required the applicant to notify the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) of the proposed Monopole I structure. However, the applicant indicates that the height of the Monopole I structure would be lower than the height of some of the surrounding trees and anticipates a "determination of no hazard" from the FAA and will not require the structure to be lit or marked. However, if the FAA does require obstruction lighting, the applicant indicates that they would work with the City to install the least visually intrusive lighting. Staff recommends a condition of approval requiring the applicant to work with the City of Renton to install the least visually intrusive lighting if the FAA requires obstruction lighting on the Monopole I structure. (8) LANDSCAPING: Landscaping shall be provided in all areas not occupied by building or paving. The Hearing Examiner may require additional landscaping to buffer adjacent properties from potentially adverse effects of the proposed use. The City's wireless communication facilities regulations require that an equipment shelter or cabinet used to house radio electronic equipment and the associated cabling connecting the equipment shelter or cabinet to the support structure be located within a building or structure, if it cannot be located within a building or structure it should be landscaped with a 15-foot sight-obscuring landscaped buffer. The applicant proposes to locate the radio base transmitting system equipment within a 383 square foot storage 'v shed. Due to the shed's location at the top of a slope and adjacent to the church parking lot, the applicant requests a reduction in the amount of required landscaping from 15 feet to 2 feet. The applicant has designed the structure to have the appearance of a residential structure rather than an equipment shelter by proposing a stick built shed with a pitched roof. Staff has reviewed the applicant's request for a reduction in the amount of required landscaping and approves the reduction from 15 feet down to 2 feet due to the design of the structure resulting in a residential appearance and the location of existing mature trees on the subject site, which would serve to screen the shed from abutting properties. Staff recommends as a condition of approval that the storage shed be designed as a stick built structure with the appearance of a residential structure with a pitched roof. (9) ACCESSORY USES: Accessory uses to conditional uses such as day schools, auditoriums used for social and sport activities, health centers, convents, preschool facilities, convalescent homes and others of a similar nature shall be considered to be separate uses and shall be subject to the provisions of the use district in which they are located. There are no accessory uses proposed. (10) CONVERSION: No existing building or structure shall be converted to a conditional use unless such building or structure complies, or is brought into compliance, with the provisions of this Chapter. The proposal is to construct a new Monopole I structure and associated storage shed, no conversion is proposed. (11) PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS: The proposed use and location shall be adequately served by and not impose an undue burden on any public improvements, facilities, utilities, and services. Approval of a conditional use permit may be conditional upon the provision and/or guarantee by the applicant of necessary public improvements, facilities, utilities, and/or services. City of Renton P/B/PW Department e T-Mobile Monopole at 1" Presbyterian Church eeliminaty Report to the Hearing Examiner LUA05-106, CU-H, ECF PUBLIC HEARING DATE November 15, 2005 Page90f9 As the subject site is existing and fully developed, no additional street or utility improvements are required as part of the proposal. Utilities Staff has indicated that all existing public utilities are currently sufficient to serve the proposed development associated with this conditional use permit. G. RECOMMENDATION: hexrpt.doc Staff recommends approval of the Conditional Use Permit for the T-Mobile Monopole at the First Presbyterian Church to be located at 2640 Benson Road S, Project File No. LUA05-106, CU-H, ERC subject to the following conditions: 1. The applicant shall be required to construct the Monopole I structure to resemble a parking lot light fixture. 2. The applicant shall be required to work with the City to select the least intrusive lighting for Monopole I structure, should the FAA require obstruction lighting. 3. The applicant shall be required to construct the proposed 383 square foot storage shed as a stick built structure resembling a residential structure with a pitched roof. R-8 R-l0 ZONING PIBII'W TJ!CJlNlCAL SBllVICBS 1lIZ8I04 R-8 j::r;;:l CJJ Q) :> <:C! ....c:: -+-> m 0 .......-i = .... toJ \C) ~ toJ ~ Z ~ Ii II--~~=t t2f ~ toJ Iii m liS ~I SE i l72nd St~ 14 -32 T23N R5E W 112 y ;;;!yO #0 1:4800 - - - -Benton Clt;, Umlt,o H4 29 T23N R5E W 1/2 5329 RESIDENTIAL ~ Resource Conservation ~ Residential 1 dulac ~ Residential 4 dulac I R-8 I Residential 8 dulac I RMH I Residential Manufactured Homes I R-IO I Residential 10 dulac I R-14 I Residential 14 dulac I RH-F I Residential Multi-FBDlily IRM-T I Residential Multi-Family Traditional I RM-U I Residential Multi-Family Urban Center. MIXED USE CENTER INDUSTRIAL ~ Center Village ~ Industrial -Heavy juc-Nil Urban Center -North 1 0 Industrial -Medium IUC-N21 Urban Center -North 2 0 Industrial -Light QE] Center Downtown. ~ Commercial/OtCice/Residential <P) Publicly owned COMMERCIAL -----Renton City Limits ~ Commercial Arterial. [§J Commercial Office· ---Adjacent City Limits _ Book Pages Boundary ~ Commercial Neiehborbood • May include Overlay Districts. See Appendix maps. For additional regulations in Overlay Districts. please see RMC 4-3. Printed by Print & Mail Svcs. City of Renton KROll PAGE PAGE# INDEX f\"1 } ~. C) -+=. \A ~,-i'\\' '~ .... ,~ .. ~~~. ...., ( H ! __ ;;,oJ!' 'I :' ,..... . .... -h ,.~.I!'\ \ . .. "" .... ... f •. '<~"'.,~\~/ \-... .:~~ .. , l.~ .~:;.'t '. ,*:~ ... ,. "I t·" . '~~;-':-:::J \' '1:" : "."",.!,~ ,I , ..... ; ! ! \ -\!to ···~·;~1I VICINITY MAP NOTTOICM.. ---- ---- "O .... COIIICI6 .. ''<ICI6_Wnt''' ... ''''' •• '.71"fO..c:-~:=::::v~~-:;c:~~~~~~~~I~J::~ I MUl n FAMlL Y ReSlOEHT1AL --'---------,---- ----.------- ------------------/ ---- I I I I I I I -1 - SINGlE FAMILY RESIDENTIAl ---- I I I I \ ! I I if /: :; ( : :/ I: \ \ \ II I I I I. Il I ~ i SCHOOl PROPERTY (l1'~~Of "'1l4··sr.ll' ... VOICE.I1 ........ LU. jIII.Itf1',M'OR ... LnADn ..... 1I 1')IO'IoGI..,ll£l,.~"·. '~r,:~~~~~,.==I:ll:.'. "ltJTlLn''''''-E !"O'IWIR.lIlCOIlAVlCCIOI..RaI ~1()t!UTLIT't \.,;11 Y OF RENTON AUG 262005 ~----------------I OVERALL am PLAN • JbUIC.I __ ._ 1l.llSC"'lI" '".10' ---~. t~~".... .. 100000000w._ •• 0ff1CI ........ ,.. ~~t~ •• t/i~)'} . !..!.~'-",;" .... ~4'~~ •• ·:~~4 ~~ rt't X r -. 0-, ~ -C --1-.-..... , l i I '"' r ", ___ r' .-~'~ j \ (, ' I ~rr ""-II.IYECIlATlOIt ~ _1'-' '--I \ t.., ~ r \ i f I f I ,/ I f i I """-1110_"""""" , ' If:' '~/1~ \ ..... ~ t : . ...,. r'l 1'-,: t;:,;l 'I:A, .i~ (:S. >",\~/. 11....,."===;,,,,0 "j '.-")-; ,~ :::;). .,.,., ~, -,7-,£;;::,1 2~7 \, ,$,.'-:~i , : '. I \l ' ''')~'':~':!.J ~" IIl'HlDTOIiIlEIIIO\'tD~ . ~ • ......... .oQ II II II 1 l , . ~ tPJVI'IOtcAH'lO IVflH'''''C#lona&SI ~ 1I'IVOICt..TMAItI .... n." '"IIH, . .t.J~OADI'''U) '''I~'''''~ DEVELOPMENT PLANNING CITY OF RENTON AUG 262005 ~t f¥I:J( iIA'II'CI.IT iii CUM ''''01'1 IOl'lllCOfolCAAW ''''lM .. I ............. T'INIIH~'O/1"ICOIoC.UI.D4JroOIl.Aa ~ll:l"""""OlO1-........ ,~t1J.·uG~COotOul" .... ~:'::.:::::--..... If'lal.t~t()I:~I)H" '\' I Ji lO'MlI'tlltlACl\'",* II1ct11.1AC"~1HCO ~ '-, "-'7 ~-----.--'.----.--. -- ~'[I""I\L"'W"" """'" " -' , -----1· : ~ .. ----\. 'I If --:-;-" I,· ", \ "-"""""'" • INLARGIDIITEPLAN ! 1Ul,.1»«l~ %2ol4lC.AL.'W •• ' lh"~:I'''.I' -=--~. I .... ~ ..... . ""'1ILLo ...... .. cwnce.1 ... ·' ... .... BINSON RD/CHURCH MP 114883' awa ANION lID UNTO ............ . .·:~~t~~·. :!~\'\. • I" ".1 t '1 \ : ".''J~-::q.~' . .a.r •• .. :~:: .. ~:.; .. r·~Tr:c.=~,-···· .... .. ::I! filii z !: u· Ii 2 c c :1110 III Z .. I .. .. u" I-CI Ii! I· z c. d is z ... 0 i ; • 2 • z II ... • iI ! (!) z Zz Ln zo 8 ~!Z <"I !Z~ CD wu. <"I ~O. (;.0 ~~ :::;) ..,J-4C( w U > w 0 1· i~·· . r i . t t J 0 .. ..... ~z:8 .1114 =~!I: \ 2z.;;' f 0 ........ H Zi~" ii ': .. ~8 "'i~" ai .. ~ ::I! S 5 " ~ . 5 i u II ~ ." ...... ..... ~ ~ .. ~... ~::~ ... ~ :=~ttft·\!.':. . t.~, !}jl~ o .. : " .. " ~;:." ; ......... - ~ • g ._~~.,;;J .. • z 0 C'I 5 > • ... I CC ... ... ~ • I i Il1 ~ -. cr ~ c- '·COHc~nI.S1All DEVELOPMENT PLANNING CITY OF RENTON AUG 262005 EIVED <e-!~ <',' 1=I1~= ! -l~rT~~=rrT~ '''"....... .W-.IW ... WI-W-" III '-I I ,LlJ-1 ",=lII:r CONTNJOS -- -.. • I=:I 1=1 q=u m:::;w=iii=iii::::: I • ::::1 I~!J!~WO::W' ~~U}m!J!m!J!~\]~br:@~1 l~w~5JWw\ I~-w-H~' r======~~~~-JL ,,, .. ""' .... , ... ~::T .. lI'o&NllIIOI 1310" ~ TO~'LOOA r---ftg~,~ , \. '''''''''''''''UM,,, ~ ~ ''''''-''G' \ I I I I : : It~PI n-------:---------- u=w, ;-r-'---t I :J ~, 61 ~ i V i !f • J DOVBl.1! r .~. TOP PlATU r •• ',lV,MJIoCj .. ,roc ,.."'1 1QTT0000PL ... n .... ~1(Al.1·'''·.''.q' It<<lH!f.Rl:D IIWS!JUOWOC @ BTS ENCLOSURE PLAN .... , ICAoLI ""'1'4' JOY"CCIIoIPOSITIONS~.u CliAAC0I\I.8lAC", f.tI,," •• "tWU)1I"UH( . PfUlrdOtUT\JAlD7' ,.-fXPOSUAI!llDING 1f4'. "WOOO~AC~ II.·.,·WOOO COAN5JtTAIll BTl ENCLOSURE ® FRAMING DUAIL .... 1 1e,,",:"'S ~'. 10' FlIl"liol\Olll rrr' .... lQPIHIHC1$) -+---.. ----+ BTS ENCLOSURE @ EAST ELEVATION A-l tt::H.t."TI ~ :=;'~:f ;; --" .. , --.~-------- BTl ENCLOSURE @ NORTH ELEVATION .... 1 SCAli:"" =n:::~ ~~PSIWQlTl ~ II' 4 I~::~~~~~~ I'IOlPrc~I'tIHC'IOHIAlOIJIRIO ' ® ~~OTING DETAIL ~,~~~-~-~--.~""'" GVT1'ER1np,,, _ _C~ -_._._----_._- ---------_.___ 1(1'-4'", IlDHGto ..... rCH (I!,STRUCTVAI BTS ENCLOSURE ® SOUTH ELEVATION .... ) ICAl.lNlI (2Jlr ._,rl'rOOO~OIJWII."'IHl III --------• l COhvtHrlOHAl.llGtol'A""' .... ""'" -lOlRCOMfIOSfTIOI'Ia-G.lac~1I\.AC.II. ·,llI.I'lD01'IHG'lilT ·"T~1'WOOO"""'0...:1 .,t,jNWf..cTtJAlDf'OCII' TRUtln "'I~TCH 2" 0 C ·1-'I6".r~KPRJ40nX1\lf\lO"'WO ·'ll'.fELTOfI.lYYE.ki'tOUSEWfIN' ·1 ,r COA PL TWOCiO ·r ... · WOOOI'TUQSAr ,rIM: WI" "'"'.T.IOnOM PLATt NCI It! r .'·TOP "-ATII -==7-----·-;~-;~~~;~~;;--------- ISU!OW",lIt1T., @ WIST KLeymoN ".1 1CAL1""1 ---~ . • ..cn_~""'11 MntIU., ...... ' O .. Kllt ... I .... '_ .......... !Y§lJt;t~>t : i' 'I : . ' . ··:i~~~~!·· Cl~:~~~~~~ToI~ Iil)lndoor coverage o Outdoor coverage o No coverage ATTACHMT 1A ! ATTAI'UUT 1D / TEASDAlE\ .• SE4663F 2640 BENSON RD RENTON. WA 98055 EXISTING PHOTO #1 19807 Nerm Creek Parkway North Bothe:!. Wash:nglon 98011 FI-:'NF. ~'t.·V'<l· '~E." .. A.x ,~~, ' ... ~.;;; of. "~!:.~ / TEASDALE·(_e SE4663F 2640 BENSON RD RENTON. WA 98055 PROPOSED PHOTO #1 VO/~~'" 19801 NOfm CrC{}k Parlo.way North H{)lhe:l Wa!';h'f1gtcn ~80 11 Pt-::)Nt; .;/~-... ~ . ..; ::'-':-,1 • .,:..c ';~'!; .:.':.d .'~~: TEASDALE e< SE4663F 2640 BENSON RD RENTON. WA 98055 EXISTING PHOTO #2 VOIa[~," 19801 tIIe'lh Creek Parkway North Ho:hail. W;ls~ln!J~o~ 98011 H"ONc .-:;ct;.o}-• ." .. ~~ I .. A,.C .li'~ ':'~i:-:f. ~~1!::; A. TEASDALE.. a. SE4663F 2640 BENSON RD RENTON. WA 98055 PROPOSED PHOTO #2 VOIces.~1!! 19607 Nol1l) Creek Parkway North Bothe;1 Waslmglo" 98011 PF:':'Nf: A:::~'~.::".~'?-'J 1-,o\.X: .:;':'.:. _':":':: :'.~.<\ STATE OF WASHINGTON, COUNTY OF KING } AFFIDA VIT OF PUBLICATION PUBLIC NOTICE Tom Meagher, being first duly sworn on oath that he is the Legal Advertising Representati ve of the King County Journal a daily newspaper, which newspaper is a legal newspaper of general circulation and is now and has been for more than six months prior to the date of publication hereinafter referred to, published in the English language continuously as a daily newspaper in King County, Washington. The King County Journal has been approved as a Legal Newspaper by order of the Superior Court of the State of Washington for King County. The notice in the exact form annexed was published in regular issues of the King County Journal (and not in supplement form) which was regularly distributed to its subscribers during the below stated period. The annexed notice, a Public Notice was published on October 24, 2005. The full amount of the fee charged for said foregoing publication is the sum ~ \\\\"'"""/ ~,,\ \... BA ;..I,,~ ~ ~ "i ...•...• -..~~ ~ Tom Meagher ~ 0 .. ··~OTAI?; .... 0 ~ ... "").. .yt.' Legal Advertising Representative, King County Journal':: ! "\ : Subscribed and sworn to me this 25th day of October, 2~~ l o4/i~J009 J ~ ~ ~ ~7.>,\ /1';:: ~,~ '. tuBl.\C ••• (.; ...... ~ ~ O .. •• .. ·;.;~ §o "'1 'J;' WAS\'\:~~"~ ~ 1111,,, ... ,,,,'" Notary Public for the State of Washington, Residing in Auburn, Washington PO Number: Cost of publishing this notice includes an affidavit surcharge. NOTICE OF ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COMMI'ITEE & PUBLIC HEARING RENTON, WASHINGTON The Environmental Review Com- mittee has issued a Determination of Non-Significance-Mitigated for the fol- lowing project under the authority of the Renton Municipal Code. T-Mobile Monopole LUA05-106, CU-H, ECF Location: 2640 Benson Road S. Applicant proposes to install a 59- foot ll-inch Monopole 1 structure with an associated storage shed! equipment shelter on the south- central portion of a 4.02-acre par- cel. The subject site is located within the Residential-8 dwelling unit per acre zoning designation and is currently developed with the First Presbyterian Church of Renton. The proposed monopole structure would be constructed as a 24-inch diameter, dark bronze pole structure designed to have the appearance of a parking lot light. Appeals of the environmental determination must be filed in writing on or before 5:00 PM on November 7, 2005. Appeals must be filed in writing together with the required $75.00 application fee with: Hearing Exam- iner, City of Renton, 1055 South Grady Way, Renton, WA 98055. Appeals to the Examiner are governed by City of Renton Municipal Code Sec- tion 4-8-110.B. Additional information regarding the appeal process may be obtained from the Renton City Clerk's Office, (425) 430-6510. A Public Hearing will be held by the Renton Hearing Examiner in the Council Chambers, City Hall, on November 22, 2005 at 9:00 AM to con- sider the Conditional Use Permit. If the Environmental Determination is appealed, the appeal will be heard as part of this public hearing. Interested parties are invited to attend the pub- lic hearing. Published in the King County Journal October 24, 2005. #849771 e e • ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION & PUBLIC HEARING ISSUANCE OF A DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE -MITIGATED (DNS-M) POSTED TO NOTIFY INTERESTED PERSONS OF AN ENVIRONMENTAL ACTION PROJECT NAME: T -Mobile Monopole at 1" Presbyterian Church PROJECT NUMBER: LUA05-106, CU-H, ECF LOCATION: 2640 Benson Road S DESCRIPTION: Applicant proposes to Install a 59-100t 11.-nch Monopole 1 structure with an associated storage shedlequlpment shetter on the soutlM:entral portion 01 a 4.02.acre parcel. The subject stte is located within the Residential - 8 dwelling unit per acre zonIng designation and Is currently developed wIth the First Presbyterian Church of Renton. The proposed monopole structure would be constructed 88 a 24--lnch diameter, dark bronze pole structure designed to have the appearance of II parking lot light. THE CITY OF RENTON ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COMMITTEE (ERC) HAS DETERMINED THAT THE PROPOSED ACTION DOES NOT HAVE A SIGNIFICANT ADVERSE IMPACT ON THE ENVIRONMENT. Appeals of the environmental determInation must be flied In writing on or before 5:00 PM on November 7, 2005. Appeals muat be ffled In writing together with the required $75.00 application fee with: Hearing Examiner, City of Renton, 1055 South Grady Way, Renton, WA 98055. Appeal. to the Examiner are governed by City of Renton Municipal Coda Section 4-8-110.B. Addltlonallnfonnatlon regarding the appeal proce •• may be obtained from the Ronlon CI1y Clerk'. OIIIco, (425) 430-6510. A PUBLIC HEARING WILL BE HELD BY THE RENTON HEARING EXAMINER AT HIS REGULAR MEETING IN THE COUNCIL CHAMBERS ON THE 7TH FLOOR OF CITY HALL, 1055 SOUTH GRADY WAY, RENTON, WASHINGTON, ON NOVEMBER 22, 2005 AT 9:00 AM TO CONSIDER THE CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT. IF THE ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION IS APPEALED, THE APPEAL WILL BE HEARD AS PART OF THIS PUBLIC HEARING. - ------1Ii1--- :---- '"'' """ " . .1. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION, PLEASE CONTACT THE CITY OF RENTON, DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DIVISION AT (425) 430-7200. DO NOT REMOVE THIS NOTICE WITHOUT PROPER AUTHORIZATION Please;lncILiciethep.r<:!jectNUM~ER.whell;,<i!iIl!ilg.,~r;p~per!I.1e·ld'!!ntiflcatlon. CERTIFICATION I, Q)ere.k, Jock... , hereby certify that.:s copies of the above document were posted by me in ~ conspicuous places or nearby the described property on DATE: 101 dol/OS , I SIGNED: DR k--(j I .~ CITY OF RENTON CURRENT PLANNING DIVISION AFFIDAVIT OF SERVICE BY MAILING On the 20th day of October, 2005, I deposited in the mails of the United States, a sealed envelope containing ERC Determination documents. This information was sent to: I," ',,<.' , ·.,' ... Name ' . " , "-.Representing Agencies See Attached 1st Presbyterian Church Owner Madeline Chaney, AICP -Odelia Pacific Corp. Contact - T -Mobile Representative /L c-.4 ... ,.-.. ~' (Signature of Sender): ~ /--<.,1.-~ .. ~ , <?~B~ES F. KOKKO > /' 0 I'\lU j·f\M Y t'UtsLili ~ STATE OF WASHINGTON ) STATE OF WASHINGTON ~ ) SS COMMiSSiON EXPIRES ~ COUNTY OF KING ) MARCH 19,2006 :.....0.:1' ~ -...., , .,.. I certify that I know or have satisfactory evidence that Stacy Tucker signed this instrument and acknowledged it to be his/her/their free and voluntary act for the uses and p:~::~s m;/nti~i~;; ~e instrument. ~ 7-~ t I ONOfry iU~lic~n .~)~~~/the Sate of Washington Notary (print}:. ___ -=--:Va.-----:-:rltS;:;---:-::-'_lO> __ lU' __________ _ My appointment expires: .!>--Itj-Ob ;'-.Project' Name:.: T-Mobile Monopole at 1st Presbyterian Church Project Number: LUA05-106, CU-H, ECF template -affidavit of service by mailing ·. AGENCY (DOE) LETTER MAILING (ERe DETERMINATIONS) Dept. of Ecology * WDFW -Stewart Reinbold * Muckleshoot Indian Tribe Fisheries Dept. * Environmental Review Section clo Department of Ecology Attn: Karen Walter or SEPA Reviewer PO Box 47703 3190 160th Ave SE 39015 -172nd Avenue SE Olympia, WA 98504-7703 Bellevue, WA 98008 Auburn, WA 98092 WSDOT Northwest Region * Duwamish Tribal Office * Muckleshoot Cultural Resources Program * Attn: Ramin Pazooki 4717 W Marginal Way SW Attn: Ms Melissa Calvert King Area Dev. Serv., MS-240 Seattle, WA 98106-1514 39015 172nd Avenue SE PO Box 330310 Auburn, WA 98092-9763 Seattle, WA 98133-9710 US Army Corp. of Engineers * KC Wastewater Treatment Division * Office of Archaeology & Historic Seattle District Office Environmental Planning Supervisor Preservation * Attn: SEPA Reviewer Ms. Shirley Marroquin Attn: Stephanie Kramer PO Box C-3755 201 S. Jackson ST, MS KSC-NR-050 PO Box 48343 Seattle, WA 98124 Seattle, WA 98104-3855 Olympia, WA 98504-8343 Jamey Taylor * Depart. of Natural Resources PO Box 47015 Olympia, WA 98504-7015 KC Dev. & Environmental Servo City of Newcastle City of Kent Attn: SEPA Section Attn: Mr. Micheal E. Nicholson Attn: Mr. Fred Satterstrom, AICP 900 Oakesdale Ave. SW Director of Community Development Acting Community Dev. Director Renton, WA 98055-1219 13020 SE 72nd Place 220 Fourth Avenue South Newcastle, WA 98059 Kent, WA 98032-5895 Metro Transit Puget Sound Energy City of Tukwila Senior Environmental Planner Municipal Liason Manager Steve Lancaster, Responsible Official Gary Kriedt Joe Jainga 6300 South center Blvd. 201 South Jackson Street KSC-TR-0431 PO Box 90868, MS: XRD-01W Tukwila, WA 98188 Seattle, WA 98104-3856 Bellevue, WA 98009-0868 Seattle Public Utilities Real Estate Services Title Examiner 700 Fifth Avenue, Suite 4900 PO Box 34018 Seattle, WA 98124-4018 Note: If the Notice of Application states that it is an "Optional DNS", the marked agencies and cities will need to be sent a copy of the checklist, PMT's, and the notice of application. * Also note, do not mail Jamey Taylor any of the notices she gets hers from the web. Only send her the ERC Determination paperwork. template -affidavit of service by mailing • ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION & PUBLIC HEARING ISSUANCE OF A DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE -MITIGATED (DNS-M) POSTED TO NOTIFY INTERESTED PERSONS OF AN ENVIRONMENTAL ACTION PROJECT NAME: T-Moblle Monopole at 1st Presbyterian Church PROJECT NUMBER: LUA05-1 06, CU-H, ECF LOCATION: 2640 Benson Road S DESCRIPTION: Applicant proposes to Install a 59-foot 11-lnch Monopole 1 structure with an associated storage shed/equipment shelter on the south-central portion of a 4.02-acre parcel. The subject site Is located within the Residential - 8 dwelling unit per acre zoning designation and is currently developed with the First Presbyterian Church of Renton. The proposed monopole structure would be constructed as a 24-lnch diameter, dark bronze pole structure designed to have the appearance of a parking lot light. THE CITY OF RENTON ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COMMITTEE (ERC) HAS DETERMINED THAT THE PROPOSED ACTION DOES NOT HAVE A SIGNIFICANT ADVERSE IMPACT ON THE ENVIRONMENT. Appeals of the environmental determination must be flied in writing on or before 5:00 PM on November 7, 2005. Appeals must be filed In writing together with the required $75.00 application fee with: Hearing Examiner, City of Renton, 1055 South Grady Way, Renton, WA 98055. Appeals to the Examiner are governed by City of Renton Municipal Code Section 4-8-110.B. Additional Information regarding the appeal process may be obtained from the Renton City Clerk's Office, (425) 430-6510. A PUBLIC HEARING WILL BE HELD BY THE RENTON HEARING EXAMINER AT HIS REGULAR MEETING IN THE COUNCIL CHAMBERS ON THE 7TH FLOOR OF CITY HALL, 1055 SOUTH GRADY WAY, RENTON, WASHINGTON, ON NOVEMBER 22, 2005 AT 9:00 AM TO CONSIDER THE CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT. IF THE ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION IS APPEALED, THE APPEAL WILL BE HEARD AS PART OF THIS PUBLIC HEARING. , , :----.. -- S881S'18"E 190.3S· PROPOSED TOWER LOCA nON SET LATH __ 1-_ S 27TtI...sL:.,.. _ L- FOR FURTHER INFORMATION, PLEASE CONTACT THE CITY OF RENTON, DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DIVISION AT (425) 430-7200. DO NOT REMOVE THIS NOTICE WITHOUT PROPER AUTHORIZATION Kathy Keolker-Wheeler, Mayor October 20, 2005 Madeline Chaney, AICP Odelia Pacific Corp. 208 Westlake Avenue N Seattle, WA 98109 ' CITY eF'RENTON PlanningIBUildinglPublic Works Department Gregg Zimmerman P.E., Administrator SUBJECT: i-Mobile Monopole at 1 51 Presbyterian Churhc LUA05-106, CU-H, ECF ' DearMs. Chaney: This letter is written on behalf of the Environmental Review Committee, (ERC) to advise you that they have completed their review of the subjectproject and have issued a threshold Determination of. Non- Significance-Mitigated with Mitigation, Measures; . Please refer to the enclosed ERG Report and Decision, Section D for alist of the Mitigation Measures. ' , ' Appeals of the environmentaldet~r~Tlination must be filed in writing on or before5:00PIIII on November 7, 2005. Appeals must be filed in writing together with the r~quired $75.00 application fee with: Hearing Examiner, City of Renton, 1055 S()'t:ilhGradyWay; Renton, WA98055. Appeals to. the Examiner are governed by City of RentOriMunicipalCode Section 4-8-H O.B. Additional information regarding theappeai process Illaybe obtain~dfmriith8 Renton CityGlerk's Office,(425) 430-6510 .. A Public Hearing will be' held by the Renton Hearing Examiner in the Council Chambers on the seventh floor of CitY Hall, 1055 South Grady Way, Renton, Washington, on Nove.mber 22,2005 at 9:00 AM to ,consider the Conditional Use Permit. The applicant or representative(s) of the applicant is required to be present at the public hearing. A copy of the staff report will be mailed to you' one week before the hearing. If the Environmental Determination is appealed, the appeal will be heard as part of this public hearing. The preceding information will assist you in planning for implementation of your project and enable you to exercise your appeal rights more fully, if you choose to do so~ If you have any questions' or desire clarification of the above, please call me at(425) 430-7219.' . For the Environmental ReviewCommittee, .A/ 0), 7/1cf/-<tV Jill K.Ding. " Associate Planner cc: 1 slpresbyterian Church IOwner{s) Enclosure ------------l-O-SS-S-o-u-fu-G-r-ad-y-W--ay-.-R-e-nt-o-n,-W-a-s-hi-ng-t-on--98-0-S-S------------~ * This paper contains 50% recycled material, 30% post consumer AHEAD OF THE CURVE CITY. RENTON. Kathy Keolker-Wheeler. Mayor PlanninglBUildinglPublic Works Department Gregg ZimmermanP;E., Administrator October 20, 2005 Washington State Department of Ecology Environmental Review Section PO Box 47703 Olympia, WA 98504~7703 Subject: Environmental Determinations Transmitted herewith is a copy of the Environmental Determination for the following project reviewed by the Environmental Review Committee (ERG) on October 18,2005: DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE -MITIGATED PROJECT NAME: PROJECT NUMBER: LOCATION: T-Mobile Monopole at 1st Presbyterian Church LUA05-1 06, aU-H, e:CF 2640 Benson Road S DESCRIPTION: AppliCant proposes to . install ·a·· 59-foot ,11-inchMonopole 1 sttucturewlthan associated storageshediequipment shelter on . the so~th;'central portion ofa4.02""acre parcel. The subject site is -locat~-within t~e Residential-8 d""elling unit per acre zoning designation ,and .. iscu~r~ntly developed with the First Presbyterian Church of Reriton.The,proposed monopole structure would be construc:t,d; 8$',;a ,. 24-illchdiamet~r,dark bronze pole ·strl,lcture designed to hay, the appearance of a parking lot light. Appeals of the environmental determination'must be filed in writing on or before 5:00 PM on . November 7, 2005. Appeals tilust'·befiled in . writing together with tne required $75.00 application fee with:· Hearing Examiner, City of Renton, 1055 South Grady Way, Renton, WA 98055. Appeals to the Exaininer are governed by City of Renton Municipal COde Section 4~8-110;B. Additional information regarding the appeal process may be obtained from the Renton City Clerk's Office, (42l5) 430-6510. If youhave questions, please call me at (425) ·430-7219. For the Environmental Review Committee, ·4JJ~P' . ~~_~._~~".gO Associate Planner cc: King County Wastewater Treatment Division WDFW, Stewart Reinbold . David F. Dietzman,Department of Natural Resources WSDOT, Northwest Region. Duwamish Tribal·Office . . Karen Walter, Fisheries, Muckleshoot Indian Tribe (Ordinance) Melissa Calvert, Muckleshoot Cultural Resources Program US Army Corp. of Engineers Stephanie Kramer, Office of Archaeology & HistoriC Preservation Enclosure -----------.... ' ------1-05-5-S-o-u-th-G-r-ad-y-W:-a-y-~-R-en-t-on-,-W-a-sh-in-g-to-n-9-g-0-55-·------R E N TON' * This paper contains 50% recycled material, 30% post consumer AHEAD OF THE CURVE • CITY OF RENTON • DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE (MITIGATED) APPLICATION NO(S): LUA05-106, CU-H, ECF APPLICANT: Madeline Chaney, Odelia Pacific Corp. PROJECT NAME: T -Mobile Monopole at 151 Presbyterian Church DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSAL: Applicant proposes to install a 59-foot 11-inch Monopole 1 structure with an associated storage shed/equipment shelter on the south-central portion of a 4.02-acre parcel. The subject site is located within the Residential - 8 dwelling unit per acre zoning designation and is currently developed with the First Presbyterian Church of Renton. The proposed monopole structure would be constructed as a 24-inch diameter, dark bronze pole structure designed to have the appearance of a parking lot light. LOCATION OF PROPOSAL: LEAD AGENCY: 2640 Benson Road S The City of Renton Department of Planning/Building/Public Works Development Planning Section The City of Renton Environmental Review Committee has determined that it does not have a probable significant adverse impact on the environment. An Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) is not required under RCW 43.21 C.030(2)(c). Conditions were imposed as mitigation measures by the Environmental Review Committee under their authority of Section 4-6-6 Renton Municipal Code. These conditions are necessary to mitigate environmental impacts identified during the environmental review process. Appeals of the environmental determination must be filed in writing on or before 5:00 PM on November 7,2005. Appeals must be filed in writing together with the required $75.00 application fee with: Hearing Examiner, City of Renton, 1055 South Grady Way, Renton, WA 98055. Appeals to the Examiner are governed by City of Renton Municipal Code Section 4-8-11 O.B. Additional information regarding the appeal process may be obtained from the Renton City Clerk's Office, (425) 430-6510. PUBLICATION DATE: October 24, 2005 DATE OF DECISION: October 18, 2005 SIGNATURES: DATE I /o-/rg DATE I CITY OF RENTON DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE-MITIGATED MITIGATION MEASURES APPLICATION NO(S): LUA05-106, CU-H, ECF APPLICANT: Madeline Chaney, Odelia Pacific Corp. PROJECT NAME: T -Mobile Monopole at 1 sl Presbyterian Church DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSAL: Applicant proposes to install a 59-foot 11-inch Monopole 1 structure with an associated storage shed/equipment shelter on the south-central portion of a 4.02-acre parcel. The subject site is located within the Residential-8 dwelling unit per acre zoning designation and is currently developed with the First Presbyterian Church of Renton. The proposed monopole structure would be constructed as a 24-inch diameter, dark bronze pole structure designed to have the appearance of a parking lot light. LOCATION OF PROPOSAL: LEAD AGENCY: MITIGATION MEASURES: 2640 Benson Road S The City of Renton Department of Planning/Building/Public Works Development Planning Section 1. The applicant shall comply with the recommendations provided in the geotechnical report prepared by LSI Adapt, Inc. dated August 24, 2005. 2. The applicant shall complete the FAA 7460-A form and submit it to the FAA. A copy of the FAA's approval shall be provided to the Development Services Division Project Manager prior to issuance of a building permit. The proposed monopole shall be lit and marked if the FAA requires it. 3. The applicant shall pay a fire mitigation fee in the amount of $0.52 per square foot for the construction of the new storage shed/equipment shelter. ERe Mitigation Measures Page 1 of 1 e CITY OF RENTON e DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE-MITIGATED ADVISORY NOTES APPLICATION NO(S): LUA05-106, CU-H, ECF APPLICANT: Madeline Chaney, Odelia Pacific Corp. PROJECT NAME: T -Mobile Monopole at 151 Presbyterian Church DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSAL: Applicant proposes to install a 59-foot 11-inch Monopole 1 structure with an associated storage shed/equipment shelter on the south-central portion of a 4.02-acre parcel. The subject site is located within the Residential - 8 dwelling unit per acre zoning designation and is currently developed with the First Presbyterian Church of Renton. The proposed monopole structure would be constructed as a 24-inch diameter, dark bronze pole structure designed to have the appearance of a parking lot light. LOCATION OF PROPOSAL: LEAD AGENCY: 2640 Benson Road S The City of Renton Department of Planning/Building/Public Works Development Planning Section Advisory Notes to Applicant: The following notes are supplemental information provided in conjunction with the environmental determination. Because these notes are provided as information only, they are not subject to the appeal process for environmental determinations. Construction Services: 1 . Building and Electrical permits are required. ERC Advisory Notes Page 1 of 1 To: Gregg Zimmerman, Planning/Building/Public Works Administrator Dennis Culp, Community Services Administrator Lee Wheeler, Fire Chief From: Jennifer Henning, Development Planning Meeting Date: Tuesday, October 18,2005 Time: 9:00AM Location: Sixth Floor Conference Room #620' Agenda listed below. Safeway Fuel Station #1468 -(Discussion only) (Weaver) LUA05-1 01, SA-A, ECF The applicant is requesting Environmental (SEPA) Review and Administrative Site Plan approval for the construction of a fueling station located at the existing Safeway store center at 4300 NE 4th Street. The proposal would include a 4,365 sq. ft. canopy with a 464 sq. ft. kiosk, in an area currently used for store parking. Four fueling dispensers and two underground tanks are proposed, with associated parkinw" landscaping, and utility improvements. The site is zoned Commercial Arterial (CA) and is located within the 4 Street Commercial Corridor and Business District Overlays. The site is located in Aquifer Protection Zone 2. A 60 to 90 day construction schedule is estimated. T-Mobile Monopole at 1st Presbyterian Church (Ding) LUA05-106, CU-H, ECF Applicant proposes to install a 59-foot 11-inch Monopole 1 structure with an associated storage shed/equipment shelter on the south-central portion of a 4.02-acre parcel. The subject site is located within the Residential - 8 dwelling unit per acre zoning deSignation and is currently developed with the First Presbyterian Church of Renton. The proposed monopole structure would be constructed as a 24-inch diameter, dark bronze pole structure designed to have the appearance of a parking lot light. cc: K. Keolker-Wheeler, Mayor J. Covington, Chief Administrative Officer A. Pietsch, EDNSP Administrator ® B. Wolters, EDNSP Director ® J. Gray, Fire Prevention N. Watts, P/B/PW Development Services Director ® F. Kaufman, Hearing Examiner S. Engler, Fire Prevention ® J. Medzegian, Council S. Meyer, P/B/PW Transportation Systems Director R. Lind, Economic Development L. Warren, City Attorney ® STAFF REPORT A. BACKGROUND ERC MEETING DATE: Project Name: Project Number: Project Manager: Project Description: Project Location: Exist. Bldg. Area gsf: -8 ercrpt_T-MobileMonopole.doc City of Renton Department of Planning / Building / Public Works ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COMMITTEE October 18, 2005 T -Mobile Monopole LUA05-106, CU-H, ECF Jill K. Ding, Associate Planner Applicant proposes to install a 59-foot 11-inch Monopole 1 structure with an associated storage shed/equipment shelter on the south-central portion of a 4.02-acre parcel. The subject site is located within the Residential - 8 dwelling unit per acre zoning designation and is currently developed with the First Presbyterian Church of Renton. The proposed monopole structure would be constructed as a 24-inch diameter, dark bronze pole structure designed to have the appearance of a parking lot light. (Project Description continued on following page) 2640 Benson Road S 10,899 square feet Site Area: 4.02 acres City of Renton PIBIPW Department T-Mobile Monopole REPORT AND DECISION OF (OCTOBER 18, 2005) PROJECT DESCRIPTION (CONTINUED) Envir~ntal Review Committee Staff Report .. LUA05-106, CU-H, ECF Page2 of2 Three antennae would be located inside an "RF-friendly" "radome" at the top of the support structure, hiding them from view. As the antennae must be mechanically down tilted to a position that exceeds the diameter of the support structure, a portion of the radome would be left open and the antennae would be visible. The visible portion of the antennae would be painted dark bronze to match the color of the support structure. Associated radio base transmitting system (BTS) equipment would be located within a new 383 square foot outbuilding that would also serve as a storage shed for the First Presbyterian Church of Renton. Emerald green arborvitae are proposed to be planted around the perimeter of the storage shed to further screen the shed from view. Protected slope areas (slopes with a greater than 40% slope) and moderate landslide hazard areas are mapped on the subject site. B. RECOMMENDATION Based on analysis of probable impacts from the proposal, staff recommends that the Responsible Officials make the following Environmental Determination: DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE Issue DNS with 14 day Appeal Period. C. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS DETERMINATION OF NON -SIGNIFICANCE -MITIGATED. xx Issue DNS-M with 14 day Appeal Period. Issue DNS-M with 15 day Comment Period followed by a 14 day Appeal Period. In compliance with RCW 43.21 C. 240, the following project environmental review addresses only those project impacts that are not adequately addressed under existing development standards and environmental regulations. 1. Earth Impacts: The topography of the subject site is hilly. The steepest slope on the subject site has a grade of approximately 70%, however this slope is located on the northern portion of the subject site, whereas the proposed monopole facility would be located on the south-central portion of the subject site. The slopes in the vicinity range from approximately 15 to 20 percent, which do not meet the definition of a steep slope per RMC 4-11-190. A geotechnical report prepared by LSI Adapt, Inc. dated August 24,2005 was submitted with the application materials. The report indicates that one boring was conducted on the subject site to a maximum depth of 26.5 feet below the ground surface in the vicinity of the proposed tower location. The boring was advanced using a trailer-mounted, hollow-stem auger drill rig. The borehole was backfilled with a mixture for soil cuttings and bentonite chips. The bore sample confirmed the presence of Ground Moraine Deposits as characterized by USGS maps. The near-surface soil consisted of 6-12 inches of grass, sod and topsoil. The next 6 feet of soil consisted of loose to medium dense, silty fine to coarse sand with some gravel. The next 5 feet of soil consisted of medium dense, silty sand with some gravel and below 12 feet dense sand, which gradually turned to very dense sand with silty sand, and some gravel was encountered. The geotechnical report recommended that the proposed monopole structure be supported on a drilled pier foundation. Additional recommendations for site preparation, equipment building or cabinet foundations, tower foundation, access driveway, and structural fill were also presented. ercrpt_ T-MobileMonopole.doc City of Renton PIBIPW Department T-Mobile Monopole REPORT AND DECISION OF (OCTOBER 18, 2005) Mitigation Measures: Envir,*ntal Review Committee Staff Report ., LUA05-106, CU-H, ECF Page3 of3 The applicant shall comply with the recommendations provided in the geotechnical report prepared by LSI Adapt, Inc. dated August 24, 2005. Policy Nexus: SEPA Environmental Regulations 2. Air Impacts: During project construction, on-site emissions will consist of fugitive dust and emissions from construction equipment. There impacts are anticipated to be minor and largely confined near the site. Short-term noise from construction equipment would occur between 7:00 AM and 5:00 PM. The equipment and construction of this project will meet federal, state, and local emissions and noise requirements; therefore no further mitigation is recommended. Mitigation Measures: No further mitigation is recommended Nexus: N/A 3. Water Impacts: The proposed project would remove a 45 square foot existing shed and replace it with a 383 square foot shed, which would sever as storage for the church and house T-Mobile's BTS equipment. The applicant contends that any stormwater runoff from this impervious area would sheet flow to the west across the subject site. The proposed new impervious area does not trigger the City's requirements for providing stormwater runoff detention and treatment. Mitigation Measures: None recommended Nexus: N/A 4. Aesthetics Impacts: The installation of the proposed monopole may have some visual impacts on the adjacent residential areas. The northern portion of the subject site is forested with mature trees consisting of a variety of deciduous and evergreen trees. In addition a row of trees (variety of deciduous and evergreen) is located along the eastern property line of the subject site, which borders Nelsen Middle and Spring Glen Elementary schools. In addition, a stand of Big Leaf Maple trees is located to the west of the proposed monopole structure. The existing trees located on the subject site should screen the proposed monopole from the adjacent residential neighborhoods and the nearby schools. As a result of this proposal no trees are proposed to be removed. Staff does not antiCipate the removal of large numbers of trees on the subject site as the site contains steep slope areas from which tree removal is limited to hazardous trees. In addition, the applicant has submitted a landscape plan, which proposes the planting of arborvitae around the perimeter of the proposed 383 square foot shed to screen the shed from adjacent properties. In addition the applicant has proposed to screen the monopole antennae within a structure that will be designed to look like a parking light pole. The applicant notes that the proposed design may negatively impact the performance of the antennae, however the proposed design was selected with the primary intention being that it would blend in with the church and surrounding residential development. Mitigation Measures: None recommended Policy Nexus: N/A 5. Transportation Impacts: The applicant indicates that the location of the proposed monopole requires notification to the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) due to its location within one of the approach surfaces of the Renton Municipal Airport. The applicant believes that the proposed monopole will receive a "determination of no hazard" from the FAA and that lighting or marking of the structure will not be required due to the ground elevation of the surrounding area exceeding the allowable height relative to the elevation of the existing runway, and the height of the proposed structure being less than the height of the surrounding trees. In the event the FAA does require the structure to be lit, the applicant contends that the least intrusive lighting will be selected. ercrpC T-MobileMonopole.doc City of Renton PIBIPW Department T-Mobile Monopole REPORT AND DECISION OF (OCTOBER 18, 2005) EnvitAental Review Committee Staff Report .. LUAOS-106, CU-H, ECF Page40f4 The Renton Municipal Airport reviewed the proposal and concluded that the terrain breaches the airspace, however there is higher terrain south and east of the site, which would shield the monopole. Marking or lighting of structures is required for structures located within the Airport Safety Zones 1-4. The subject site is located outside of Airport Safety Zones 1-4 and therefore would not require marking or lighting per RMC 4-3-020A unless such marking or lighting is required by the FAA. Staff recommends a mitigation measure, which requires the applicant to complete the FAA 7460- A form and submit it to the FAA. A copy of the FAA's approval shall be provided to the Development Services Division Project Manager prior to issuance of a building permit. Mitigation Measures: The applicant shall complete the FAA 7460-A form and submit it to the FAA. A copy of the FAA's approval shall be provided to the Development Services Division Project Manager prior to issuance of a building permit. The proposed monopole shall be lit and marked if the FAA requires it. Nexus: SEPA Environmental Regulations, RMC 4-3-020 6. Fire Services Impacts: The proposed site is located within the Renton Fire Department service area. City Fire Department standards require a fire hydrant capable of 1500 gpm fire flow within 150 feet of the structure and one additional hydrant within 300 feet of the structure. The proposal would add new construction to the City and would potentially impact the City's Fire Department. A Fire Mitigation Fee in the amount of $0.52 per square foot is required for all new construction to fund the additional service requirements. Mitigation Measures: The applicant shall pay a fire mitigation fee in the amount of $0.52 per square foot for the construction of the new storage shed/equipment shelter. Policy Nexus: SEPA Environmental Regulations D. MITIGATION MEASURES 1. The applicant shall comply with the recommendations provided in the geotechnical report prepared by LSI Adapt, Inc. dated August 24, 2005. 2. The applicant shall complete the FAA 7460-A form and submit it to the FAA. A copy of the FAA's approval shall be provided to the Development Services Division Project Manager prior to issuance of a building permit. The proposed monopole shall be lit and marked if the FAA requires it. 3. The applicant shall pay a fire mitigation fee in the amount of $0.52 per square foot for the construction of the new storage shed/equipment shelter. E. COMMENTS OF REVIEWING DEPARTMENTS The proposal has been circulated to City Departmental/Divisional Reviewers for their review. Where applicable, these comments have been incorporated into the text of this report as Mitigation Measures and/or Notes to Applicant. -K-Copies of all Review Comments are contained in the Official File. __ Copies of all Review Comments are attached to this report. Environmental Determination Appeal Process: Appeals of the environmental determination must be filed in writing on or before 5:00 PM November 7, 2005. Appeals must be filed in writing together with the required $75.00 application fee with: Hearing Examiner, City of Renton, 1055 South Grady Way, Renton, W A 98055. Appeals to the Examiner are governed by City of Renton Municipal Code Section 4-8-110. Additional information regarding the appeal process may be obtained from the Renton City Clerk's Office, (425)-430-6510. ercrpC T -MobileMonopole.doc City of Renton PIBIPW Department T-Mobile Monopole REPORT AND DECISION OF (OCTOBER 18, 2005) Advisory Notes to Applicant: Envir6ental Review Committee Staff Report .. LUAOS-I06, CU-H, ECF Page50f5 The following notes are supplemental information provided in conjunction with the environmental determination_ Because these notes are provided as information only, they are not subject to the appeal process for environmental determinations Construction Services: 1. Building and Electrical permits are required. ercrpC T -MobileMonopole.doc R-8 R-10 ZONING PIBIPW TBCllNlCAL IIJ!RVIClIS UI28IO+ R-8 i:£I (f) Q) i:£I :> (f) ~ ...c:= Q) ......., :> LD ~ 0 .....-i 0 .....-i I4 .. 32 T23N R5E W 112 - - - -Renton dH;y Umi ... R-8 ." 1 200 W 1:4800 i:£I (f) Q) :> ~ ...c:= ......., O:l 0 .....-i H4 = • ~ \0 ~ ~ w Z ~ 29 T23N R5E W 1/2 5329 I _ONING MAP Sc.K RESIDENTiAL o Resource Conservation ~ Residential 1 dulac ~ Residential" dulac ~ Residential 8 dulac ~ Residential Manufactured Homes I R-10 I Residential 10 dulac I R-14 I Residential 14 dulac I RH-rl Residential Multi-Family IRH-T I Residential Multi-Family TraditionaJ IRM-ul Residential Multi-Family Urban Center- MIXED USE CENTER ~ Center Village IUC-Nli Urban. Center -North §I Urban Center -North 2 ~ Cenler DOlrlltown. I COR I Commercial/Office/ResidenUal COMMERCIAL @] Commercial Arterial- ~ Commercial Office- ~ Commercial Neigbborhood INDUSTRIAL ~ Industrial -Heavy 0 Industrial -Medium 0 Industrial -Light <P> Publicly owned ----Renlon City Limits ---Adjacent City Limits _ Book Pages Boundary KROLL PAGE • May include Overlay Districts. See Appendi:.: maps. For additional regulations in Overlay Districts. please see RMC 4-3. PAGE# INDEX Printed by Print & Mail Svcs, City of Renton i I,{} '{.r '~i ;~.; ;1 . I 1'"1 \ .••.•• , ...... " .. .... I;t:!I1t II •.•.. f. ~.'" ., •• t' 11/~~~JT"7i '.. .,~ t r' ... · ;! ! ... , .~~ ;!,~. VICINITY MAP NOT ro OCIIIL' .............. -..- 110 awoa-Of"rcI l·tOf"_,/OI ntN ... ,NI.".""TOI'Ca tH .... ,!·.llIOn'" ... '-tJ04 •• ,ttanTll .. l.lln TOlLi ~:-~:THlI.tIolQSIIlI.'~NmnnI0'OlLl"CM I MULTIFAMILY RESIOENTW.. I I I I I I ---------.---' .--------- SINGLE FAMilY RESIDENTIAl MULTI FAMILY AESIDENTlAl i i I ~ i. i" ~ ii SCHOOl. PROPERTY IIJ''''IO:.to~Ol (ItJ),I'oIII'. U· ... VOICUtllllAollllHI!lll .. (II.'"'....,'~ ..... \.TI .. OIITAl.IJ 4'1111 AOI.. 11Ul/rolOl'6ClKl..l,.·. "'Jt'U.GhC~AI'tOUTM11211l' ., "'P·U.Q"YCtrLCO"0UTM1\2II~'.' IIJUTlUTlPOLe I~WEIt' nlCO IEA\IIICf IOUACII OVERALL SITE PLAN 22dol SCAU.: '··111 IhlJtc;A.I.l:I·'acr L-. ~. _ .~~._ -- ----.............. I Io..nt"'U"U CITY OF RENTON AUG 2 6 2005 -----. ~. tM01 MOInltOMU .. .., • _on.L,W._H .. ICII .... I .. .,... ~ .......... .,.\~,.4. I ~.,,.. "'u,,~.I.~. ~ (~\I\ ~:'+ J1I'" . .: •• ~J~(.. "'on-<' [~\"'Ars ~ ~Utl'lE.w"lf'IlI.ElIAH1E.NMASLOCAUgOl'lA"".1I" AOI..I"OI..WrTli.lI.OIJI>IoIf. .. ' .. ""."" ... ,.,. SHEl TlA Nu.A ft.I( 'AI( 01' 'It( IroIONO'OUi DRAWlNQ INFORMATIO"I DOhOlllClII&.£ I)fU.w"QJ CQf'ltRotoC,tII' IlllUST .... ,.,., loll O ......... NGAD\'IIECOIfkA.l.....,..Of NtrEAAORS NlDOIoIIIIDHS illl.l .... VICUl4SUli.0f" fHlSORA"M'OG AN IUHRMDIO If ' .... ..,.l,,1 ", ... !SOt. TI-tIE HOfW,.\Tt0t4 COI'ITAI't£O ~ THUt UT Of POCU14NTI IS ~TAIII'.',....TuN:.,.,.YUIEOAODCl.O$UAl OTHI"'T_I'III-<ICto.Nf.L..,t.R:OlO_OC~etoTIS n"ICTLJl"II.OHlainO DRAWI"G TI1L.1 I' . SITE PLAN I [i-4-1 II / ------------- I g ~ ii / I 6 I ) I i i / -'- -..... i ~ i ~ I I : ~ ~ i i [ ~ ... • ... ~ I ~ ;; ;; I I i i I l b ;; ! / " ~ I " - .. --. --- --,., .-------- -' .. "--------- l 'I I, I'IADOfoI(NC)~_~N'",P(lID AHTI-Ql.NI(MO"," i\ I, : \' , , -', --II)\lU."'I'O.( ./IIIC"'IIICMII.DG t'~ _. "'~Fl!!' 0 "'WIJTM'19'~f\~:X:'" .;",- ':' .: :':,', IrU.CQl,O,~II,ct"C_If"¥I:lI"O ~1IIO!J"D"'Dl~I. . .':',:' : ~ ''', . " " O'~'''llJll~~ICI''IICllh·.IGL'' . ,; .. .1," DEVELOPMENT PLANNING CITY OFRENTON AUG 262005 ';", ":i:::;:;:i!H,,i!H::iiHi "!"":"':!':'::':!:!:!':::' "!'::: ::::"';"\'!:!'i" El ~. l ___________ .-~>~,~~ ----~~.~~~q-~~~,~ - - - --- ~ .t...oo ,VC"'",,'OII[HCIOIf.IIIIII:Dl'.,..., UITILrlAnClfl U..,.,ICN..(:lI,r_r4" 'IoIJSCAl.I,YV'_I'4" ---~. t....,IIKMI1'MC ..... ~. ItOnc.&..WA_tt ornca,u.,_,_ BINION RD/CHURCH MP 1146&3' , H4Q"NaONRD UNTO ......... ... ~,~.~~, ... l·$'a~'I:;~ -\ :; a": ~".'~ • ..,.~:~: ... "1, •• .:Jo~l •• I"" .. f •••• . " .... TEASDALE:' • SE4663F 2640 BENSON RD RENTON. WA 98055 EXISTING PHOTO #1 19807 North Creek Parkway North 8otheU, Wash.ngton 98011 r'H:JNE"· "2 tr· 3.ri.d· / ~e~ FA-K 4i~Jij~-... ~ti~ ;-e TEASDAlE,F'. SE4663F 2640 BENSON RD RENTON. WA 98055 PROPOSED PHOTO #1 rm~ 19807 North Crook Parkway North Bothe~. Washl11g!on 98011 PHONE . .;.<~-:!-r,B'· :~~il f-A'( .:;:~ . .:.:.!t,;. :~:~;;; ;':.:-.. ;:'-::.' ".", " TEASDAlE·ee SE4663F 2640 BENSON RD RENTON. WA 98055 EXISTING PHOTO #2 ~ 19607 North Creek Park ..... ay North Bothell, WashlOg1on 98011 PHONE ·'H,~~~. ~5~:1 f-A,)( "F!:.3i!<:f'-"~!..'-;; • TEASDALl~K SE4663F 2640 BENSON RD RENTON. WA 98055 PROPOSED PHOTO #2 19807 North Creek Parkway North Bothell, Wasl1lllg1on 98011 I'HONE ~~~:l-r ... ~.'~~" f-"'~ .;:.!!: •• '!.;" "~,!:,,~; • DATE: TO: CITY OF RENTON MEMORANDUM September 26, 2005 Jill Ding FROM: ~an lilian x7216 SUBJECT: T -MOBILE (VOICESTREAM) 2640 -Benson Road SE LUA05-106 I have reviewed the application for Voice Stream (T-Mobile) project located at 2640 -Benson Road South and have the following comments: CODE REQUIREMENTS UTILITIES 1. Fire flow requirement is 1,500 gpm. There is a 10-inch water main in Benson Rd South. Derated fire flow available is in excess of 2,500 gpm. Two hydrants are required to serve this site. One hydrant is required to be within 150 feet of the structure and one additional hydrant is required to be within 300 feet. Existing hydrants counted, as fire protection shall be retrofitted with a 5" quick disconnect fitting if not already in place. cc: Kayren Kittrick e City of Renton Department of Planning / Building / pU.Works ENVIRONMENTAL & DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: ~ 'Revle,...J COMMENTS DUE: SEPTEMBER 30, 2005 APPLICATION NO: LUA05-106, CU-H, ECF DATE CIRCULATED: SEPTEMBER 16,2005 APPLICANT: T-Mobile -Madeline Chaney, Odelia Pacific Corp PROJECT MANAGER: Jill Ding PROJECT TITLE: T-Mobile Monopole @ 1st Presbyterian Church PLAN REVIEW: Jan lilian SITE AREA: 4.01 acres BUILDING AREA (gross): 280 square feet LOCATION: 2640 Benson Road S I WORK ORDER NO: 77473 SUMMARY OF PROPOSAL: Installation of an approximately 60-foot tall Monopole structure disguised as a light pole and assoicated equipmenVstorage building. The subject site is 4.02 acres (175,111 square feet) in area and is located within the Residential-8 dwelling unit per acre zoning designation. The monopole and equipmenVstorage building would be located within the south-central portion of the subject site and is a minimum of 100 feet from other residentially zoned properties. Access to the monopole and equipmenVstorage building would be provided via an existing driveway directly onto Benson Road S. A. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT (e.g. Non-Code) COMMENTS Element of the Probable Probable More Element of the Probable Probable More Environment Minor Major Information Environment Minor Major Information Impacts Impacts Necessary Impacts Impacts Necessary Earth Housing Air Aesthetics Water Light/Glare Plants Recreation Land/Shoreline Use Utilities Animals Transportation Environmental Health Public Services Energy/ Historic/Cultural Natural Resources Preservation Airport Environment 10.000 Feet 14.000 Feet B. POLICY-RELATED COMMENTS C. CODE-RELATED COMMENTS We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas in which we have expertise and have identified areas of probable impact or areas where additional information is needed to properly assess this proposal. Date City olnton Department of Planning / Building / puAorks ENVIRONMENTAL & DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET REVIEWING DEPARTMENT:~eI ~A ~ COMMENTS DUE: SEPTEMBER 30, 2005 , APPLICATION NO: LUA05-106, CU-H, ECF DATE CIRCULATED: SEPTEMBER 16,2005 APPLICANT: T-Mobile -Madeline Chaney, Odelia Pacific Corp PROJECT MANAGER: Jill DinfL PROJECT TITLE: T-Mobile Monopole @ 1st Presbyterian Church PLAN REVIEW: Jan lilian SITE AREA: 4.01 acres BUILDING AREA (gross): 280 ~uare feet LOCATION: 2640 Benson Road S I WORK ORDER NO: 77473 SUMMARY OF PROPOSAL: Installation of an approximately 60-foot tall Monopole structure disguised as a light pole and assoicated equipmenVstorage building. The subject site is 4.02 acres (175,111 square feet) in area and is located within the ResidBntinl-8 dwelling unit per acre zoning designation. The monopole and equipmenVstorage building would be located within the south-central portion of the subject site and is a minimum of 100 feet from other residentially zoned properties. Access to the monopole and equipmenVstorage building would be provided via an existing driveway directly onto Benson Road S. A. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT (e.g. Non-Code) COMMENTS Element of the Probable Probable More Element of the Probable Probable More Environment Minor Major Information Impacts Impacts Necessary Environment Minor Major Information Impacts Impacts Necessary Earth Housing Air Aesthetics Water UahtiGlare Plants Recreation Land/Shoreline Use Utilities Animals Transportation Environmental Health Public Services Energy/ Historic/Cultural Natural Resources Preservation Airport Environment 10,000 Feet 14,000 Feet B. POLICY-RELATED COMMENTS C. CODE-RELATED COMMENTS We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas in which we have expertise and have identified areas of probable impact or areas where additional informati 's needed to properly assess this proposal. Signature of Director or City olnton Department of Planning / Building / puAorks ENVIRONMENTAL & DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: 1fZU""'" COMMENTS DUE: SEPTEMBER 30, 2005 . APPLICATION NO: LUA05-106, CU-H, ECF DATE CIRCULATED: SEPTEMBER 16,2005 APPLICANT: T-Mobile -Madeline Chaney, Odelia Pacific Corp PROJECT MANAGER: Jill DinQ PROJECT TITLE: T-Mobile Monopole @ 1s1 Presbyterian Church PLAN REVIEW: JeR..mian Jv I \C4 Y\ ~ SITE AREA: 4.01 acres BUILDING AREA (gross): 280 square feet LOCATION: 2640 Benson Road S I WORK ORDER NO: 77473 SUMMARY OF PROPOSAL: Installation of an approximately 60-foot tall Monopole structure disguised as a light pole and assoicated equipment/storage building. The subject site is 4.02 acres (175,111 square feet) in area and is located within the Residential-8 dwelling unit per acre zoning designation. The monopole and equipment/storage building would be located within the south-central portion of the subject site and is a minimum of 100 feet from other residentially zoned properties. Access to the monopole and equipment/storage building would be provided via an existing driveway directly onto Benson Road S. A. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT (e.g. Non-Code) COMMENTS Element of the Probable Probable More Element of the Probable Probable More Environment Minor Major Information Environment Minor Major Information Impacts Impacts Necessary Impacts Impacts Necessary Earth Housing Air Aesthetics Water Liaht/Glare Plants Recreation Land/Shoreline Use Utilities Animals Transportation Environmental Health Public Services Energy/ Historic/Cultural Natural Resources Preservation Airport Environment 10.000 Feet 14.000 Feet , 8. POLICY-RELATED COMMENTS C. CODE-RELATED COMMENTS We have revie.:ved this application with particular attention to those areas in which we have expertise and have identified areas of probable impact or areas where additional information is needed to properly assess this proposal. Signature of Director or Authorized Representative Date .. • City olnton Department of Planning / Building / pu&orks ENVIRONMENTAL & DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: tire. COMMENTS DUE: SEPTEMBER 30, 2005 APPLICATION NO: LUA05-106, CU-H, ECF DATE CIRCULATED: SEPT"" ,'':'''''0 iI':, -mnl:; ~6r") I ~ lG lE n \\ .n = ltFtl APPLICANT: T-Mobile -Madeline Chaney, Odelia Pacific Corp PROJECT MANAGER: Jill Di U \.'/ IE PROJECT TITLE: T-Mobile Monopole @ 181 Presbyterian Church PLAN REVIEW: Jan lilian li~~1 SITE AREA: 4.01 acres III 1M BUILDING AREA (gross): 28( ~,bJ .~e fe&EP 1 Ii 2DlJli IIU i II j LOCATION: 2640 Benson Road S WORK ORDER NO: 77473 I I~ SU~MARY OF PROP~~AL: Installati~n of ~n ~pproximately 60-foot tall Monopole st.ructure di~~u.ised as ~fj~~\'~Q.I~f~~~B'J~~soicated eqUl~ment/~torage bUlldlnlJ. The. subJect site IS 4.02 acres (175,~11 square feet) I.n .area an ;<' In",,+,..)jI'Wi~tI)~'Residential-8 dwelhng Unit per acre zOning deSignation. The monopole and eqUipment/storage bUilding would be located Within the south-central portion of the subject site and is a minimum of 100 feet from other residentially zoned properties. Access to the monopole and equipment/storage building would be provided via an existing driveway directly onto Benson Road S. A. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT (e.g. Non-Code) COMMENTS Element of the Probable Probable More Element of the Probable Probable More Environment Minor Major Information Impacts Impacts Necessary Environment Minor Major Information Impacts Impacts Necessary Earth Housing Air Aesthetics Water Light/Glare Plants Recreation Land/Shoreline Use Utilities Animals Transportation Environmental Health Public Services Energy/ Historic/Cultural Natural Resources Preservation Airport Environment 10,000 Feet 14,000 Feet B. POLICY-RELATED COMMENTS ;U~( C. CODE-RELATED COMMENTS We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas in which we have expertise and have identified areas of probable impact or a"*'" whe,. ackJjt;onaJ i"'''''''''1ion i, ""eded to properly '" !hi, proposal. 1lrz /# ~ Signature of Director or Authorized Representative Date I / I , ..... " .,. • • CITY OF RENTON FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU MEMORANDUM DATE: September 19, 2005 TO: Jill Ding, Associate Planner FROM: Corey Thomas, Plans Review Inspector SUBJECT: T-Mobile Monopole @ 1 st Presbyterian Church Project MITIGATION ITEMS; 1. A fire mitigation fee of $145.60 is required based on $0.52 per square foot. FIRE CODE REQUIREMENTS: 1. The preliminary fire flow is 1,500 gpm, one hydrant is required within 150 feet of the structure and one hydrant is required within 300 feet of the structure. Existing hydrants appear adequate. 2. Fire Department access roadways are required to within 150 feet of all portions of the building exterior. Roadways are a minimum 20 in width with a turning radius of 45 foot outside and 25 foot inside. Existing roadways appear adequate. 3. Provide a minimum 2AI0BC portable fire extinguisher. City olnton Department of Planning / Building / puAorks ENVIRONMENTAL & DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION .REVIEW SHEET REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: COMMENTS DUE: SEPTEMBER 30, 2005 DATE CIRCULATED: SEPTEMBER 16,200 APPLICANT: T-Mobile -Madeline Chane, Odelia Pacific Cor PROJECT MANAGER: Jill Din PROJECT TITLE: T-Mobile Mono ole @ 1st Presb erian Church PLAN REVIEW: Jan lilian I 6 I[)05 SITE AREA: 4.01 acres LOCATION: 2640 Benson Road S SUMMARY OF PROPOSAL: Installation of an approximately 60-foot tall Monopole structure disguised as a light pole and assoicated equipment/storage building. The subject site is 4.02 acres (175,111 square feet) in area and is located within the Residential-8 dwelling unit per acre zoning designation. The monopole and equipment/storage building would be located within the south-central portion of the subject site and is a minimum of 100 feet from other residentially zoned properties. Access to the monopole and equipment/storage building would be provided via an existing driveway directly onto Benson Road S. A. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT (e.g. Non-Code) COMMENTS Element of the Probable Probable More Element of the Probable Probable More Environment Minor Major Information Environment Minor Major Information Impacts Impacts Necessary Impacts Impacts Necessary Earth Housina Air Aesthetics Water LigMiGlare Plants Recreation Land/Shoreline Use Utilities Animals Transportation Environmental Health Public SeNices Energy! Historic/Cultural Natural Resources Preservation Airport Environment 10,000 Feet 14,000 Feet B. POL/CY-RELA TED COMMENTS C. CODE-RELATED COMMENTS attention to those areas in which we have expertise and have identified areas of probable impact or perly assess this proposal. City _en ton Department of Planning / Building / pU.Works ENVIRONMENTAL & DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: Al, ~ t COMMENTS DUE: SEPTEMBER 30, 2005 t APPLICATION NO: LUA05-106, CU-H, ECF DATE CIRCULATED: SEPTEMBER 16, 2005 APPLICANT: T-Mobile -Madeline Chaney, Odelia Pacific Corp PROJECT MANAGER: Jill Ding PROJECT TITLE: T-Mobile Monopole @ 18t Presbyterian Church PLAN REVIEW: Jan lilian SITE AREA: 4.01 acres BUILDING AREA (gross): 280 square feet LOCATION: 2640 Benson Road S WORK ORDER NO: 77473 SUMMARY OF PROPOSAL: Installation of an approximately 60-foot tall Monopole structure disguised as a light pole and assoicated equipmenVstorage building. The subject site is 4.02 acres (175,111 square feet) in area and is located within the Residential-8 dwelling unit per acre zoning designation. The monopole and equipmenVstorage building would be located within the south-central portion of the subject site and is a minimum of 100 feet from other residentially zoned properties. Access to the monopole and equipmenVstorage building would be provided via an existing driveway directly onto Benson Road S. A. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT (e.g. Non-Code) COMMENTS Element of the Probable Probable More Element of the Probable Probable More Environment Minor Major Information Impacts Impacts Necessary Environment Minor Major Information Impacts Impacts Necessary Earth Housing Air Aesthetics Water Light/Glare Plants Recreation Land/Shoreline Use Utilities Animals Transpo~ation Environmental Health Public Services Energy/ Historic/Cultural Natural Resources Preservation Airport Environment « 10,000 Feet 14,000 Feet B. POLICY-RELATED COMMENTS articular attention to those areas in which we have expertise and have identified areas of probable impact or de to properly assess this proposal. Date City .enton Department of Planning / Building / pu. Works ENVIRONMENTAL & DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: Parte; COMMENTS DUE: SEPTEMBER 30, 2005 APPLICATION NO: LUA05-106, CU-H, ECF DATE CIRCULATED: SEPTEMBER 16, 2005 APPLICANT: T-Mobile -Madeline Chaney, Odelia Pacific Corp PROJECT MANAGER: Jill Ding PROJECT TITLE: T-Mobile Monopole @ 1s' Presbyterian Church PLAN REVIEW: Jan lilian SITE AREA: 4.01 acres BUILDING AREA(gross): 280 square feet LOCATION: 2640 Benson Road S I WORK ORDER NO: 77473 SUMMARY OF PROPOSAL: Installation of an approximately 60400t tall Monopole structure disguised as a light pole and assoicated equipment/storage building. The subject site is 4.02 acres (175,111 square feet) in area and is located within the Residential-8 dwelling unit per acre zoning designation. The monopole and equipment/storage building would be located within the south-central portion of the subject site and is a minimum of 100 feet from other residentially zoned properties. Access to the monopole and equipment/storage building would be provided via an existing driveway directly onto Benson Road S. A. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT (e.g. Non-Code) COMMENTS Element of the Probable Probable More Element of the Probable Probable More Environment Minor Major Information Impacts Impacts Necessary Environment Minor Major Information Impacts Impacts Necessary Earth Housina Air Aesthetics Water Light/Glare Plants Recreation Land/Shoreline Use Utilities Animals Transportation Environmental Health Public Services Energy/ Historic/Cultural Natural Resources Preservation Airport Environment 10,000 Feet 14,000 Feet i6A B. POLICY-RELATED COMMENTS ~CJflA-jW ~~ Iv /bJ/d, C. We have reviewed this application with particular att tion to those areas in which we have expertise and have identified areas of probable impact or areas where additional info ation is needed to pfi e yassess this pro osal. / I 7 /0 2, r. / :5 Date City o.nton Department of Planning / Building / puAorks ENVIRONMENTAL & DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: ~+tu...clt~ COMMENTS DUE: SEPTEMBER 30, 2005 APPLICATION NO: LUA05-106, CU-H, ECF DATE CIRCULATED: SEPTEMBER 16,2005 APPLICANT: T-Mobile -Madeline Chaney, Odelia Pacific Corp PROJECT MANAGER: Jill Ding PROJECT TITLE: T-Mobile Monopole @ 1s, Presbyterian Church PLAN REVIEW: Jan lilian SITE AREA: 4.01 acres BUILDING AREA (gross): 280 square feet LOCATION: 2640 Benson Road S I WORK ORDER NO: 77473 SUMMARY OF PROPOSAL: Installation of an approximately 60-foot tall Monopole structure disguised as a light pole and assoicated equipment/storage building. The subject site is 4.02 acres (175,111 square feet) in area and is located within the Residential-8 dwelling unit per acre zoning designation. The monopole and equipment/storage building would be located within the south-central portion of the subject site and is a minimum of 100 feet from other residentially zoned properties. Access to the monopole and equipment/storage building would be provided via an existing driveway directly onto Benson Road S. A. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT (e.g. Non-Code) COMMENTS Element of the Probable Probable More Element of the Probable Probable More Environment Minor Major Information Environment Minor Major Information Impacts Impacts Necessary Impacts Impacts Necessary Earth Housing Air Aesthetics Water Light/Glare Plants Recreation Land/Shoreline Use Utilities Animals Transportation Environmental Health Public SeNices Energy/ Historic/Cultural Natural Resources Preservation Airport Environment 10,000 Feet 14,000 Feet B. POLICY-RELATED COMMENTS C. CODE-RELATEDCOMMEN!...S ~ ~ / A~ A ___ .J';Z;; "" .. ~ c:-./ ~f~~V~~/~' We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas in which we have expertise and have identified areas of probable impact or areas where dditional information is neede to roperly assess this proposal. Si Date NOTICE OF APPLICATION AND PROPOSED DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE-MITIGATED (DNS-M) DATE: September 16, 2005 LAND USE NUMBER: LUAOS.l06, CU·H, ECF PROJECT NAME: T -Mobile Monopole at 1" Presbyterian Church PROJECT DESCRIPTlQN: Installation of an approximatety 6O-fool tali Monopole structure disguised as a; light pole and assoicated equipment/storage building. The subject site is 4.02 acres (175,111 square feet) in area and is I located within the Residential-8 dwel1ing unit per acre zoning designation. The monopole and equipment/storage building would be located within the south-central panion of the subject site and is a minimum 01 100 feet from other residentially zoned properties. Access 10 the monopole and equipment/storage building would be provided via an existing driveway directly onto Benson Road S. PROJECT LOCATION: 2640 Benson Road S OPTIONAL DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE. MITIGATED (DN5-M): As the Lead Agency, the City of Renton has determined that significant environmental impacts are unlikely to resuH from the proposed project. Therefore, as I permitted under the RCW 43.21C.l10, the City of Renton is using the Optional DNS-M proc8ssto give notice that a DNS- M is likely to be issued. Comment periods for the project and the proposed DNS-M are integrated into a single comment period. There will be no comment period following the Issuance of the Threshold Determination of Non-Significance-I Mitigated (DNS-M). A 14-day appeal period will follow the Issuance of the DNS-M. i PERMIT APPLICATION DATE: NOTICE OF COMPLETE APPLICATION: August 26, 2005 September 16, 2005 APPLICANTIPROJECT CONTACT PERSON: Madeline Chaney, A1CP· Odella Pacific Corp.; Tel: (425) 346-0128 Eml: mchaneyOodelia.com PennltllRevlew Requested: Other Permits which may be requIred: Requested Studies: Location where application may be reviewed: PUBLIC HEARING: CONSISTENCY OVERVIEW: ZonlnglLand Use: EnvIronmental Documents that Evaluate the Proposed Project: Development Regulations Used For Project Mitigation: Environmental (SEPA) Revklw, Hearing Examiner Conditional Use Conditional Use and Building Pennns Geotechlnlcal Study, Non-Ionizing Electromagenetlc Exposure AnalysIs and Englneertng Certification PlanninglBulldlnglPublic Works Department, Development Services Division, SIxth Floor Renton City Hall, 1055 South Grady Way, Renton, WA 98055 A Pubtic hearing is tentatively scheduled for November 22. 2005 belore the Renton Hearing Examiner in Benton Council Chambers. Hearings begin at 9:00 AM on the 7th floor of the new Benton City Hall located at 1055 South Grady Way. The subject site Is designated Residential Single Family on the City of Renton Comprehensive Land Use Map and Reskiential - 8 (B-8) on the City's Zoning Map. Environmental (SEPA) Checklist The project will be subject to the City's SEPA ordinance, RMC 4-4-140 Wireless I Communication Facilities and other applicable codes and regulations as appropriate. Proposed Mitigation Measures: The following Mitigation Measures will likely be imposed on the proposed project. These recommended Mitigation Measures address project impacts not covered by existing codes and regulations as cited above. The appflcant shall pay a Fire M#igation Fee equal to SO.52 per squam foot of the building square footage. The Fire Mffigation Feels payablB prior to building permit approval. Comments on the above application must be submftted In wrttlng to Jill Ding, Alloclate Planner, Development Services Division, 1055 South Grady Way, Renton, WA 98055, by 5:00 PM on September 30, 2005. This matter is also tentatively scheduled for a public hearing on November 22, 2005, at 9:00 AM, Council Chambers, Seventh Floor, Renton City Hall, 1055 South Grady Way, Renton. If you are interested in attending the hearing, please contact the Development Services Division to ensure that the hearing has not been rescheduled at (425) 430-7282. If comments cannot be submitted in writing by the date indicated above, you may still appear at the hearing and present your comments on the proposal before the Hearing Examiner. If you have questions about this proposal. or wish to be made a party of record and receive additional information by mail, please contact the project manager. Anyone who submits wrinen comments will automatically become a party 01 record and will be nottfled of any decision on this project. CONTACT PERSON: Jill K. Ding, Associate Planner; Tel: (425) 430-7219 PLEASE INCLUDE THE PROJECT NUMBER WHEN CALUNG FOR PROPER FILE IDENTIFICATION ". & If you would like to be made a party of record to receive further information on this proposed project, complete this form and return to: Ci~ of Renton, Development Planning, 1055 So. Grady Way, Renton, WA 98055. Name/File No.: T-Mobile Monopole at 1st Presbyterian ChurchILUA05-106, CU-H, ECF NAME: MAILING ADDRESS: TELEPHONE NO.: ________ _ CERTIFICATION -" .......... ", ~ AL~\ I, ~ ~ , hereby certify that.3 copies of the above ~~~ON·i:·L.-'~;;\ ~ '" ~,!'~. 1..0 • ~, / were posted by me in _0_ conspicuous places or nearby the described prop~9W OTARY ~'" ~ '~ ~<C:o~ _ (n: , /? ___ " <.) -' f DATE: '1/"/0$ SIGNED:Q1t ~ ~~ \. PUBLIC .:~: If d}; .... .]_19"'\)~/t:..° ~ ATTEST: Subscribed and sworn before me, a Notary Public, in and for the State of Washington residing i~', ~' •• " ••• ,: 'A..~0 :' \\'t:OFW/lS~' _-S~~ ,onthe IJ4 dayof -Stt~q:rY)/;?(/r ~~--- NOTARY PUBLIC SIGNATURE: . , On the 16th day of September, 2005, I deposited in the mails of the United States, a sealed envelope containing Acceptance Ltr, NOA, Environmental Checklist, & PMT's documents. This information was sent to: Agencies -Env. Checklist, PMT's, & NOA See Attached Madeline Chaney -Accpt Ltr Applicant/Contact 1st Presbyterian Church of Renton -Accpt Ltr Owner Surrounding Property Owners -NOA only See attached (Signature of Sender),.:..,.: .,JfJ.~~~~~:l:!:::::!:::l.~~~-----_____ _ ) SS COUNTY OF KING ) I certify that I know or have satisfactory evidence that Stacy Tucker signed this instrument and acknowledged it to be his/her/their free and voluntary act for the uses and purposes mentioned in the instrument. Dated: __ q.....J/_Z/;_I_o_) __ Notary (Print): My appointment expires: T-Mobile Monopole at 1st Presbyterian Church LUA05-106, CU-H, ECF template -affidavit of service by mailing Dept. of Ecology" Environmental Review Section PO Box 47703 Olympia, WA 98504-7703 WSDOT Northwest Region" Attn: Ramin Pazooki King Area Dev. Serv., MS-240 PO Box 330310 Seattle, WA 98133-9710 US Army Corp. of Engineers" Seattle District Office Attn: SEPA Reviewer PO Box C-3755 Seattle, WA 98124 Jamey Taylor" Depart. of Natural Resources PO Box 47015 Olymj!ia, WA 98504-7015 KC Dev. & Environmental Servo Attn: SEPA Section 900 Oakesdale Ave. SW Renton, WA 98055-1219 Metro Transit Senior Environmental Planner Gary Kriedt AGENCY (DOE) LETTER MAILING (ERe DETERMINATIONS) WDFW -Stewart Reinbold" Muckleshoot Indian Tribe Fisheries Dept. " c/o Department of Ecology Attn: Karen Walter or SEPA Reviewer 3190 160th Ave SE 39015 -172nd Avenue SE Bellevue, WA 98008 Auburn, WA 98092 Duwamish Tribal Office" Muckleshoot Cultural Resources Program" 4717 W Marginal Way SW Attn: Ms Melissa Calvert Seattle, WA 98106-1514 39015 172nd Avenue SE Auburn, WA 98092-9763 KC Wastewater Treatment Division" Office of Archaeology & Historic Environmental Planning Supervisor Preservation" Ms. Shirley Marroquin Attn: Stephanie Kramer 201 S. Jackson ST, MS KSC-NR-050 PO Box 48343 Seattle, WA 98104-3855 Olympia, W A 98504-8343 City of Newcastle City of Kent Attn: Mr. Micheal E. Nicholson Attn: Mr. Fred Satterstrom, AICP Director of Community Development Acting Community Dev. Director 13020 SE 72nd Place 220 Fourth Avenue South Newcastle, WA 98059 Kent, WA 98032-5895 Puget Sound Energy City of Tukwila Municipal Liason Manager Steve Lancaster, Responsible Official Joe Jainga 6300 Southcenter Blvd. 201 South Jackson Street KSC-TR-0431 PO Box 90868, MS: XRD-01W Tukwila, WA 98188 Seattle, WA 98104-3856 Bellevue, WA 98009-0868 Seattle Public Utilities Real Estate Services Title Examiner 700 Fifth Avenue, Suite 4900 PO Box 34018 Seattle, WA 98124-4018 Note: If the Notice of Application states that it is an "Optional DNS", the marked agencies and cities will need to be sent a copy of the checklist, PMT's, and the notice of application. " Also note, do not mail Jamey Taylor any of the notices she gets hers from the web. Only send her the ERC Determination paperwork. template -affidavit of service by mailing , Jam and Smudge Free Printing Use Avery® TEMPLATE 5160® SAIREZ TEODOLFO C+GAIL Y 16501 BENSONRD S RENTON W A 98055 ROSA JAMES V 2724 BENSON RD S RENTON WA 98055 FIRST PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH OF RENTON 10414 SE 164TH ST RENTON W A 98055 HILLSIDE LLC C/O GRAND PEAKS PROP MGMT 4582 S ULSTER ST PKWY #1200 DENVER CO 80237 DEMIDIO BRADLEY T+YELSA WIL 1409 S 27TH ST RENTON W A 98055 HILLESTAD STEVE+DEBRA 1305 S 27TH ST RENTON W A 98055 RAZI HAMID & MASAUJI GEANE 2603 CEDAR A V S RENTON W A 98055 LOCLARENCE 2608 CEDAR A V S RENTON WA 98055 ESPINOSA ORLANDO M+ELEANOR 2626 CEDAR A V S RENTON W A 98055 KUBIK WILLIAM J 2714 CEDAR A V S RENTON W A 98055 --www.avery.com 1-800-GO-AVERY e FABER BRUCE R 383519THAVESW SEATTLE WA 98106 PATU-OWENS VIRGINIAF POBOX 18996 SEATTLE WA 98118 SPATH VELMA L 16415 BENSON RD S RENTON W A 98055 ZIMMERMAN ADAM+ELIZABETH W TRUST 1417 S 27TH ST RENTON W A 98055 ! SCHEMNITZER JOSEPH 1405 S 27TH ST RENTON W A 98055 BRYCE KENNETH S 2611 CEDARAV S RENTON W A 98055 BENTZ MICHAEL D 1207 S 26TH ST RENTON WA 98055 KOLBYSENT 16427 BENSON RD S RENTON W A 98055 RENTON SCHOOL DIST 403 300SW7THST RENTON W A 98055 DAVIS AARON 2705 BENSON RD S RENTON W A 98055 AVILA SHELAH N+ALFREDO B 1413 S 27TH ST j RENTON W A 98055 CUMMINGS GLENN R+RUTH A 1307 S 27TH ST RENTON W A 98055 , DELANCEY ROBERT D 2607 CEDAR A V S RENTON W A 98055 SIEVERS MICHAEL W+ELENA 1211 S 26TH ST RENTON W A 98055 MORRIS RICHARD D & SHERIL .. NGO QUOC J 2614 CEDAR AV S ' 2620 CEDAR AV S RENTON WA 98055 ' RENTON WA 98055 WARD TERI+ JAMES n 2702 CEDAR A V S RENTON WA 98055 ',I KIM YOUNG W+KANG HYUNG 2720 CEDAR A V S RENTON W A 98055 AH:lI\V-09-o08-l WOy,{JaAe·MMM -- FERRER-MCNEAL ELMA S POBOX 58372 , RENTON W A 98058 HERNANDEZ FRANK+LUPE 2300 BENSON RD S #A-l RENTON WA 98055 e09l5 t!Jeqe6 al zas!I!tn ap!deJ a6elp~s I? ta a6eJJnoq!tue uo!ssaJdWI Jam a.nd Smudge Free Printing , Use Avery® TEMPLATE 5160® DOS SANTOS EDSON GOMES JR+ELAINE 2300 BENSON RD S #A-2 RENTON WA 98055 GILLS EMMAL 2300 BENSON RD S #A-5 RENTON W A 98055 KRIV ACIC JOHN F+NATALIZIO 2300 BENSON RD S #B-2 RENTON W A 98055 CLARY-MAHAN TARYN JEANNETTE 2300 BENSON RD S #B-5 RENTON W A 98055 . -www.avery.com e -1-800-GO-AVERY ! MITCHELL PATRICK i M+TAMILEE 2300 BENSON RD S #A-3 RENTON W A 98055 TOY JOYCEM 2300 BENSON RD S #A-6 RENTON W A 98055 MILLSLESLEYK -~ 2300 BENSON RD S #B-3'1 J ~ Ictr RENTON W A 98055 BOOKER BEVERLY A 2300 BENSON RD S #B-6 RENTON W A 98055 CITY LIGHTS LLC -o,s4U!L I <. COLLINS WILLIAM L t\bt-r!e~ . 4030 LK W ASHINGTON,BL VD . 2300 BENSON RD S #C-2 #201 Of -z.cJc£ KIRKLAND W A 98033 RENTON W A 98055 RICHARDSON MARK 2300 BENSON RD S #C-4 RENTON W A 98055 , MIYAMOTO ALEX T , 2300 BENSON RD S #D-1 . RENTON W A 98055 SPURRIER DIANE 2300 BENSON RD S #D-4 RENTON W A 98055 BROWN WARDELL F 2300 BENSON RD S #E-3 RENTON W A 98055 COY BRIAN M+BORT KELI E 2300 BENSON RD S #F-2 RENTON W A 98055 FAUST KEN A 2300 BENSON RD S #C-5 RENTON W A 98055 PLEISS LISA K 2300 BENSON RD S #D-2 ! RENTON W A 98055 CYPHERS JUDy A I 2300 BENSON RD S #E-1 RENTON W A 98055 I MARQUARDT HILDA R 2300 BENSON RD S #E-4 RENTON W A 98055 VALDEZ CHRISTOPHER PASCUA 2300 BENSON RD S #F-3 RENTON W A 98055 AH3J\V-09-008-~ I WO)',{JaAe"MMM -- e ~ AVERY® 5160® LAWSON ANDREW H+ADASSA JB ~~ &~~Dr"Sfi 2)00 2E~J"80N RD S #A.: 4 RENTON WA ~ q roQ'. re¥tIa4'\er;t q I~r& NEILL RICHARD SCOTT POBOX 59955 RENTON W A 98058 LOEVA WAI-YIN 2300 BENSON RD S #B-4 RENTONW A 98055 WONG YEE-MAN+WUN YING LEUN 2300 BENSON RD S #B-7 RENTON W A 98055 BAKER DONALD E 2300 BENSON RD S #C-3 RENTON W A 98055 VOLDJAMESW 2300 BENSON RD S #C-6 . RENTON WA 98055 MCCREARY DAVID & HSU RUEY : 2300 BENSON RD S #D-3 . RENTON W A 98055 HILFRINK TAUNY A 2300 BENSON RD S #E-2 RENTON W A 98055 I HUNDLEY ERIK L I 2300 BENSON RD S #F-1 RENTON W A 98055 VORA VONGSENG VIMONEKEOK 2300 BENSON RD S #F-4 , RENTON W A 98055 @09~5 t!Jeqe6 al zas!lpn ap!deJ a6elp~s I? ~a a6eJJnoq!~ue uo!ssaJdWI Jam and Smudge Free Printing Use Avery® TEMPLATE 5160® CUSIN MARGO A 2300 BENSON RD S #F-5 RENTON W A 98055 NGUYEN SOPHIA 2300 BENSON RD S #G-3 RENTON WA 98055 , SAWYER VANESSA A+SCOTT ,JACQ ~ 2300 BENSON RD S #H-2 .RENTONWA 98055 -e -wwwoaveryocom 1-800-GO-AVERY , ! SZATKIEWICZ JAMES+MARY , LOU 2300 BENSON RD S #G-l . RENTON W A 98055 ! MOUTON GLENDA L : 2300 BENSON RD S #G-4 RENTON WA 98055 RABENA NICHOLAS i F+KA THERINE 2300 BENSON RD S #H-3 RENTON W A 98055 I' - e ~ AVERV® 5160® WONGDAVIDM 2300 BENSON RD S #G-2 RENTON W A 98055 GESELL JUDITH 2300 BENSON RD S #H-l RENTON W A 98055 POON HAI+CHONG PUI YING 16510 167TH ST SW , RENTON W A 98058 . . ®091.S ~!Jeqe6 al zasmm AH3I\Y-09-00IN WO)OAlaAeOMMM -aOldeJ a6eUlas e la afiPJlnnnnlll> IInICC=>ltflill e e DATE: September 16, 2005 LAND USE NUMBER: LUA05-106, CU-H, ECF PROJECT NAME: T-Mobile Monopole at 1st Presbyterian Church PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Installation of an approximately 60-foot tall Monopole structure disguised as a light pole and assoicated equipmenVstorage building. The subject site is 4.02 acres (175,111 square feet) in area and is located within the Residential-8 dwelling unit per acre zoning designation. The monopole and equipmenVstorage building would be located within the south-central portion of the subject site and is a minimum of 100 feet from other residentially zoned properties. Access to the monopole and equipmenVstorage building would be provided via an existing driveway directly onto Benson Road S. . PROJECT LOCATION: 2640 Benson Road S OPTIONAL DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE, MITIGATED (DNS-M): As the Lead Agency, the City of Renton has determined that significant environmental impacts are unlikely to result from the proposed project. Therefore, as permitted under the RCW 43.21 C.11 0, the City of Renton is using the Optional DNS-M process to give notice that a DNS- M is likely to be issued. Comment periods for the project and the proposed DNS-M are integrated into a single comment period. There will be no comment period following the issuance of the Threshold Determination of Non-Significance- Mitigated (DNS-M). A 14-day appeal period will follow the issuance of the DNS-M. PERMIT APPLICATION DATE: August 26, 2005 NOTICE OF COMPLETE APPLICATION: September 16, 2005 APPLICANT/PROJECT CONTACT PERSON: Madeline Chaney, AlCP -Odelia Pacific Corp.; Tel: (425) 346-0128 Eml: mchaney@odelia.com Permits/Review Requested: Other Permits which may be required: Requested Studies: Location where application may be reviewed: PUBLIC HEARING: CONSISTENCY OVERVIEW: Zoning/Land Use: Environmental Documents that Evaluate the Proposed Project: Development Regulations Used For Project Mitigation: Environmental (SEPA) Review, Hearing Examiner Conditional Use Conditional Use and Building Permits Geotechinical Study, Non-ionizing Electromagenetic Exposure Analysis and Engineering Certification Planning/Buildlng/Public Works Department, Development Services Division, Sixth Floor Renton City Hall, 1055 South Grady Way, Renton, WA 98055 A Public hearing is tentatively scheduled for November 22, 2005 before the Renton Hearing Examiner in Renton Council Chambers. Hearings begin at 9:00 AM on the 7th floor of the new Renton City Hall located at 1055 South Grady Way. The subject site is designated Residential Single Family on the City of Renton Comprehensive Land Use Map and Residential - 8 (R-8) on the City's Zoning Map. Environmental (SEPA) Checklist The project will be subject to the City's SEPA ordinance, RMC 4-4-140 Wireless Communication Facilities and other applicable codes and regulations as appropriate. Proposed MItigation Measures: The following Mitigation Measures will likely be imposed on the proposed project. These recommended Mitigation Measures address project impacts not covered by existing codes and regulations as cited above. The applicant shall pay a· Fire Mitigation Fee equal to $0.52 per square foot of the'building square footage. The Fire Mitigation Fee is payable prior to building permit approval ... Comments on the above application must be submitted In writing to Jill Ding, Associate. Planner, Development Services Division, 1055 South Grady Way, Renton, WA 98055, by 5:00 PM on September 30, 2005 •. This matter Is also tentatively scheduled for a public hearing on November 22, 2005, at 9:00 AM, Council Chambers, .Seventh Floor, Renton City Hall, 1055 South Grady Way, Renton. If you are interested in attending the hearing, please contact the Development Services Division to ensure that the hearing has not been rescheduled at (425) 430~7282. If comments cannot be submitted in writing by the date indicated above, you may still appear at the hearing and present your comments on the proposal before the Hearing Examiner. If you have questions about this proposal, or wish to be made a party of record and receive additional information by mail, please .contact the project manager. Anyone who submits written comments will automatically become a party of record and will be notified of any decision on this project. CONTACT PERSON: Jill K. Ding, Associate Planner; Tel: (425) 430-7219 I PLEASE INCLUDE THE PROJECT NUMBER WHEN CALLING FOR PROPER FILE IDENTIFICATION I , , ~ .. --, -" 190.36' PROPOSED TO'M:R LOCA nON SET LATH _. ___ 1--- S 27Tt!~_L- If you would like to be made a party of record to receive further information on this proposed project, complete this form and return to: City of Renton, Development Planning, 1055 So. Grady Way, Renton, WA 98055. Name/File No.: T-Mobile Monopole at 1st Presbyterian ChurchlLUA05-106, CU-H, ECF NAME: MAILING ADDRESS: . TELEPHONE NO.: ________ _ CITye>F RENTON PlanningIBuildinglPublic Works Department Kathy Keolker-Wheeler. Mayor Gregg Zimmerman P.E., Administrator September 16, 2005 Madeline Chaney, AICP Odelia Pacific Corp. 208 Westlake Avenue N Seattle,WA 98109 Subject: T -Mobile Monopole at 1 sl Presbyterian Church LUA05-106, CU-H, ECF Dear Ms. Chaney: The Development Planning Section of the City of Renton has determined that the subject application is complete according to submittal requirementsahd, therefore, is accepted for review. . , It is tentatively scheduled for consid~rationby th~' Environmental Review Committee on October 18, 2005. Prior to that review; you-will be notifiec:iif. any additional information is required to continue processing your-application. ' In addition, this matter is, tentatively scheduled for a Public Hearing on November 22, 2005 at 9:00 AM, Council Chambers, Seventh Floor, Renton City Hall, 1055 South Grady Way, Renton. The applicant-or representative(s) of the applicant are required to be present at the public hearing. A copy of the staff report will be mailed to you one week before the hearing. Please contact me at (425) 430-7219.if-you have any questions. Sincerely, //).' ~'j). r. ... 71'c~V /J.,.. ( , 'Jill K. Ding Associate. Planner cc: 1 sl Presbyterian Church of Renton / Owner ----~--~--1-05-5-S-o-u-th-G-r-ad-y-W;-a-y-~-R-e-nt-on-,-W;-a-Sh~i-ng-to-n--98-0-5-5------------~ * This paper contains 50% recyded material, 30% post consumer AHEAD OF THE CURVE CITY~F RENTON Kathy Keolker-Wheeler. Mayor PlanningIBuildinglPublic Works Department Gregg Zimmerman P.E., Administrator September 16, 2005 Superintendent's Office Renton School District #403 300 SW 7th Street Renton, WA 98055-2307 Subject: T :-Mobile Monopole @ 1st Presbyterian Church LUA05-106,CU-H, ECF The City of Renton Development Services Division has received an application to install a 60-foot tall monopole structure disguised !is a light pole and associated equipment/storage building located at 2640 Benson Road S.Please see the enclosed Notice of ~pplicationfor furtherdetails. . Please forward any comments. yO[j . may have regarding this projeCt to my attention, Development Services Division, City of Renton, 1 055 South Grady Way, Renton, Washington 98055 by Septemoor 39,2005. If you have any questions regarcjing this project, please contact me at (425) 430-7219. Sincerely; I:::rnng 7f ;;p 7J Associate Planner Ene!. ------------l-O-SS-s-o-u-th-G-r-ad-y-W-a-y---R-e-nt-on-,-W-a-Sh-i-ng-t-on--98-0-5-5------------~ ® This paper contains 50% recyded material. 30% post consumer AH~AD OF THE CURVE j / ,1 / ~05 -DG?> ~D'5 -\0& _ ~ 0"5_ \~~ City of Renton LAND USE PERMIT PROPERTY OWNER(S) PROJECT INFORMATION NAME: First Presbyterian Church of Renton PROJECT OR DEVELOPMENT NAME: ADDRESS: 2640 BENSON RD S T-Mobile Site SE4663, Benson Road MP/Church PROJECT/ADDRESS(S)/LOCATION AND ZIP CODE: CITY: Renton ZIP: 98055 2640 Benson Road South TELEPHONE NUMBER: 425 221-3491 Renton WA 98055 KING COUNTY ASSESSOR'S ACCOUNT NUMBER(S): APPLICANT (if other than owner) 2923059102 NAME: Madeline Chaney AICP for Voicestream PCS III Corp. (T -Mobile) EXISTING LAND USE(S): Church COMPANY (if applicable): Odelia Pacific Corp. PROPOSED LAND USE(S): 60' tall Monopole 1 structure disguised as light pole and associated stick built equipment ADDRESS: 208 Westlake Ave. North shed. EXISTING COMPREHENSIVE PLAN MAP DESIGNATION: CITY: Seattle, WA ZIP: 98109 Residential single family TELEPHONE NUMBER 425 346-0128 PROPOSED COMPREHENSIVE PLAN MAP DESIGNATION (if applicable): N/A CONTACT PERSON EXISTING ZONING: R-8, Residential/8 du per acre NAME: Madeline Chaney AICP PROPOSED ZONING (if applicable): N/A COMPANY (if applicable): SITE AREA (in square feet): approx. 375 ADDRESS: 208 Westlake Ave. North SQUARE FOOTAGE OF ROADWAYS TO BE DEDICATED FOR SUBDIVISIONS OR PRIVATE STREETS SERVING THREE LOTS OR MORE (if applicable): CITY: Seattle, WA ZIP: 98109 N/A PROPOSED RESIDENTIAL DENSITY IN UNITS PER NET TELEPHONE NUMBER AND E-MAIL ADDRESS: ACRE (if applicable): N/A 425346-0128, mchane)l@odelia.com , Q:web/pw/devserv/fonns/planninglmasterapp.doc 08/09/05 PRceCT INFORMATION (continet) NUMBER OF PROPOSED LOTS (if applicable): N/A NUMBER OF EMPLOYEES TO BE EMPLOYED BY THE NEW PROJECT (if applicable): N/A NUMBER OF NEW DWELLING UNITS (if applicable): N/A PROJECT VALUE: $80,000 IS THE SITE LOCATED IN ANY TYPE OF NUMBER OF EXISTING DWELLING UNITS (if applicable): ENVIRONMENTALL Y CRITICAL AREA, PLEASE INCLUDE N/A SQUARE FOOTAGE (if applicable): SQUARE FOOTAGE OF PROPOSED RESIDENTIAL o AQUIFER PROTECTION AREA ONE BUILDINGS (if applicable): N/A o AQUIFER PROTECTION AREA TWO SQUARE FOOTAGE OF EXISTING RESIDENTIAL BUILDINGS TO REMAIN (if applicable): N/A o FLOOD HAZARD AREA sq. ft. SQUARE FOOTAGE OF PROPOSED NON-RESIDENTIAL o GEOLOGIC HAZARD sq. ft. BUILDINGS (if applicable): approx. 280 o HABITAT CONSERVATION sq. ft. SQUARE FOOTAGE OF EXISTING NON-RESIDENTIAL BUILDINGS TO REMAIN (if applicable): church: 10,899 o SHORELINE STREAMS AND LAKES sq. ft. NET FLOOR AREA OF NON-RESIDENTIAL BUILDINGS (if o WETLANDS sq. ft. applicable): approx. 11,200 LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF PROPERTY (Attach legal description on separate sheet with the following information included) SITUATE IN THE NW QUARTER OF SECTION 29, TOWNSHIP 23, RANGE 5, IN THE CITY OF RENTON -----, KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON. TYPE OF APPLICATION & FEES List all land use applications being applied for: 1. Conditional Use Permit \\"Et ). ~(1 I~' 3. 2. Environmental Checklist '::lCO.OfJ 4. 0'0 ~/':LOO. Staff will calculate applicable fees and postage: $ Q:web/pw/devserv/fomls/planninglmasterapp.doc 07/12/05 • P.JECT INFORMATION (Continue_ AFFIDAVIT OF OWNERSHIP I, (Print Name/s) /."'" 0 ~ \. L W f c:.-ks , declare that I am (please check one) _ the current owner of the property involved in this application or the authorized representative to act for a corporation (please attach proof of authorization) and that the foregoing statements and answers herein contained and the information herewith are in.all.r~§P,ects true and correct t.o t~!3Sl0M I1n_o'!{ledge and belief. b1¥-\\5 OC VJ:bW .. ~~ CJJ~'1 O.~_ ~ • / I certify that I know or have satisfactory eVidence~:T, ~ \A \~~ signed this instrument and acknowledged it to b~er/thelrffeealldjvolt;'n ary act for the 1/') uses and purposes mentioned in the instrument. Notary Public in and for the State of Washington (Signature of Owner/Representative) Notary (Print) ~. L. b.~ My appointment expires: __ ....:\'--_q __ ~_-><:'--___ _ Q:web/pw/devserv/fomls/planning!masterapp.doc 07112105 S1!.LKl!..lAKf ~U~ a/STATE ~ e .-----.. _-... -_ ... -.......... ---........... -... - RETURN TO: CORPORATIONS DIVISION P.O. BOX 40234 OLYMPIA. WA 98504-0234 NAME OF REGISTERED AGENT: TIM WICKS CORPORATION NAME AND REGISTERED OFFICE ADDRESS: FIRST PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH OF RENTON c/o TIM WICKS 2640 BENSON RD S RENTON WA 98055 I Filing Fee .10.00 I Make Checks payable to Secretary of State CORPORATION ACCOUNT#: 2-154400-2 UNIFIED BUSINESS IDENTIFIER #: 601 144 401 STATE OF INCORPORATION: WA INC.lQUAl. DATE: 06/08/1961 TO AVOID AUTOMATIC DISSOLUTION/REVOCATION YOU MUST FILE AN ANNUAL REPORT BY JUNE, 30 2005. If registered agent or address printed above has changed, complete this section. These actions must have been authorized by the Board of Directors. NEW REGISTERED OFFICE ADDRESS (Str •• t address-a Post Office box cennot b. IIccflpted 010 IS registered office address' EFFECTIVE DATE ADDRESS OF PRINCIPAL PLACE OF BUSINESS IN WASHINGTON TELEPHONE NUMBER OF CORPORATION ADDRESS OF FOREIGN CORPORATION'S PRINCIPAL OFFICE WHEREVER LOCATED NEW AGENT'S SIGNATURE (X) NEW REGISTERED AGENT'S NAME List names and addresses of officers and directors. "'Same" or "'no change" will not be accepted. The President can..!!21 serve as Secretary. :RESIDENT fCiv'k,1\J (A'IT Name Addres. City "- '. PRESIDENT {<i~"',l (it. Kfil"';/ L-t1\- City s .... r;:'lY'/!NV' (iVA-, Addren ·.ECRETARY Name -TiI'V/ tL'~{j...:.s / cYJi4 ;-;,_.:-' f f',: t'vP 7'bL~\T Zip 9'l~')i/L- Zip 9':~j(<;"" City s .... Zip /(e .. " 1)?,,1 L-V/t ~"p.;:O'-i..: L· ./,)-- City S1ata Zip (kt. ~E4,SIJRER Name > Address f?cy:L0i t I-§JTS ___ ~4 ')-L3_. 'X-;:;::.-=-'j--"'"C-t7.....:.1_~-'--._5_-1 __ ..;=---~~ __ ---.:....::...:...:.-::-:-----'~---=--_ Name Address ~'IRECTORS J~: C,,' ,.(;Jlt, c9 6, 'hi,'-i City -ttach li.t, 0':;;;1'",4. ,.I City r-ieny describe the affairs the corporation Is conducting in the state of Washington :) the affairs listed above differ from those recorded with the Office of the Secretary of State? YES 0 you Indicated "'Yes"', what is the nature of and the reason for the change? (Corporation may be ... qulrad to file an amendment to Its articles of incorporation if chanv" are eldensive) the corporation a non-stocK. nonprofit corporation incorporated under Chapter 24.03 RCW? If you indicated "'No'" or "'Unknown"', you may proceed to the signature line. 1S the corporation filed an Internal Revenue Service Form 990 with the IRS? If yOI' indic'Ited "No"', yotl mrly proceed to the signature line YESW YES 0 l-<.i4- iA NO '121 NO 0 NO '0 Sbte s .... j>~~OS:~_ Zip t:::~/).>~,. Zip UNKNOWN 0 'ate of most recent Form 990 filing __________ .19 __ _ For the year ending ___ / ____ /.19 'st Total Revenue as reported on IRS Form 990, Part " line 12 IEnter "NfA-If nothing reported to the IRS) st "Unrelated Business Income .... as reported on IRS Form 990-T (Ent.r "N/A-if nothil1O reported to the IRS) C)b· '2.. <) .. 2. (~O-;" DATE FORM IS SIGNED According to State Law, 24.03 RCW, this document must be signed by either the President, Vice-president, secretary, or Treasurer. Order No. 598448 LEGAL DESCRIPTION The land referred to in this commitment is situated in the State of washington, and described as follows: That portion of the northeast quarter of the northwest quarter of Section 29, Township 23 North, Range 5 East, W.M., in King County, Washington, described as follows: Beginning at the southwest corner of said northeast quarter of the northwest quarter; Thence north 88°12'38" east along the south line of said northeast quarter of the northwest quarter 87.77 feet to the TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING; Thence continuing north 88°12'38" east 250.00 feet; Thence north 1°42'40" east 749.65 feet; Thence north 88°17'20" west 191.67 feet to the easterly line of the Benson Road (State Road No. 5C); Thence southerly along said easterly line on a curve to the right with a radius of 1462.69 feet a distance of 487.42 feet; Thence continuing along said easterly line on a curve to left with a radius of 447.68 feet, a distance of 285.95 feet to the TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING; EXCEPT the south 30 feet thereof conveyed to King County by Deed recorded under Recording Number 5098735. END OF SCHEDULE A NOTE FOR INFORMATIONAL PURPOSES ONLY: The following may be used as an abbreviated legal description on the documents to be recorded, per amended RCW 65.04. Said abbreviated legal description is not a substitute. for a complete legal description within the body of the document. Ptn. NE NW 29-23-05 ; DATE: TO: FROM: SUBJECT: FIRE DEPARTMENT MEMORANDU August 8, 2005 Jill Hall, Associate Planner· I 01 James Gray, Assistant Fire Marshafi 1/f. I Mobile Monopole 7 Shelter, 264Uenson Rd. S. Fire Department Comments: 1. The preliminary fire flow is 1500 GPM, one hydrant is required within 150 feet of the structure and one additional hydrant is required within 300 feet of the structure. 2. A fire mitigation fee of$379.50 is required based on $.52 per square foot oftli'e building square footage. 3. Portable fire extinguishers are required, minimum 2A-I0 BC rated. 4. Fire department access roadways are required to within 150 feet of all portions of the building exterior. Roadways area minimum 20 feet in width with a turning radius of 45 feet outside and 25 feet inside. 5. Fire department dead end access roadways over 150 feet in length are required to have an approved turnaround. Please feel free to contact me if you have any questions. i:\comm.doc I TO: FROM: DATE: Jill Hall Jan lilian August 9, 2005 CITY OF RENTON MEMO UTILITY PLAN REVIEW SUBJECT: PREAPPLICATON REVIEW COMMENTS T-MOBILE MONOPOLE PREAPP NO. 05-103 2640 -Benson Road S. NOTE ON PRELIMINARY REVIEW COMMENTS CONTAINED IN THIS REPORT: The following comments on development and permitting issues are based on the pre- application submittals made to the City of Renton by the applicant. The applicant is cautioned that information contained in this summary may be subject to modification and/or concurrence by official decision makers (e.g. Hearing Examiner, Boards of Adjustment, Board of Public Works and City Council). Review comments may also need to be revised based on site planning and other design changes required by the City or made by the applicant. GENERAL COMMENTS After reviewing the proposed site plan, and information provided, there is no utility related comments at this time. If applicant needs to enter the City of Renton's right-of-way for any reason, a right of way permit will be required from the City. DATE: TO: FROM: SUBJECT: CITY OF RENTON Planning/Building/Public Works MEMORANDUM August 11 , 2005 Pre-Application File No. 05-103 Jill Hall,.Associate Planner, x 7219 T -Mobile -Monopole General: We have completed a preliminary review of the pre-application for the above- referenced development proposal. The following comments on development and permitting issues are based on the pre-application submittals made to the City of Renton by the applicant and the codes In effect on the date of review. The applicant is cautioned that information contained in this summary may be subject to modification and/or concurrence by official decision-makers (e.g., Hearing Examiner, Zoning Administrator, Board of Adjustment; Board of Public Works, and City Council). Review comments may also need to be revised based on site planning and other design changes required by City staff or made by the applicant. The applicant is encouraged to review all applicable sections of the Renton Municipal Code. The Development Regulations are available for purchase for $50, plus tax, from the Finance Division on the first floor of City Hall. Project Proposal: The subject property is located on the east side of Benson Road S and is addressed as 2640 Benson Road S, location of the First Presbyterian Church. The proposal is to install a new 59' 11" monopole approximately 6 feet to the north of the existing church building. Three antennas would be located within an "RF-friendly" "radome" at the top of the structure, which would hide them from view. Associated radio base transmitting system (BTS) eqUipment would be located within a new stick-built 383 square foot outbuilding structure. The propose storage building would replace an existing 45 square foot storage shed. Zoning: The subject property is located within the Residential - 8 dwelling unit per acre (R-8) zoning designation. The proposed wireless support structure meets the definition of a "Monopole I" per RMC 4-11-230. The Monopole I is not permitted within the R-8 zone, unless a Conditional Use Permit is granted by the Hearing Examiner and the facjlity is on a parcel that exceeds 1 acre in area and is setback a minimum of 100 feet from any adjacent reSidentially zoned parcel. Development Standards: All wireless communications facilities are subject to the development standards specified under RMC section 4-4-140 as well as the R-8 zoning designation as discussed below: Height -The maximum permitted height for a Monopole I is less than 60 feet for all zones. Macro facilities are the "tallesr attachment allowed on a Monopole I, which could be an additional 15 feet above the monopole. Micro and mini facilities are also permitted to be located on the monopole. Color -Depending on which type of facility is used in either application, micro, mini or macro facilities are required to be the same color as the support structure or existing building to which it is attached. Landscaping/Screening -When equipment shelters or cabinets can not be located in a building or underground, they shall be fenced screened, and landscaped in conformance with RMC 4-4-070, Landscaping. Landscaping shall include a minimum 15-foot sight obscuring landscape buffer around the accessory eqUipment facility. Screening details shall be provided at the time of formal land use application. Setbacks -The required setbacks in the R-8 zone are 15 feet in front for the primary structure and 20 feet in front for the attached garage, 20 feet in the rear, 5 feet on interior side yards, and T -Mobile -Monopole Pre-Application Meeting Page 2 of 2 15 feet on side yards along streets (including access easements) for the primary structure and 20 feet on side yards along streets (including access easements) for the attached garage. In addition Monopole I structures shall be setback a minimum of 100 feet from adjacent residentially zoned properties. The subject property is adjacent to residentially zoned properties along all property lines, therefore the proposed facility shall be setback a minimum of 100 feet from all property lines. It appears the proposed monopole location would not comply with the minimum 100-foot setback from the eastern property line. Environmental Review: Personal wireless service facilities are exempt from Environmental (SEPA) Review per WAC 197-11-800 if the personal wireless service tower is less than 60 feet in height and is located in a commercial, industrial, manufacturing, forest, or agricultural zone. The proposed personal wireless service facility would be located within a residential zone, therefore the project is subject to Environmental (SEPA) Review. Permit Requirements: The proposal would require approval of a Hearing Examiner Conditional Use permit and Environmental Review. The review process would require a public hearing and would be completed in an estimated time frame of 8-10 weeks once a complete application is accepted. The application fee for the Hearing Examiner Conditional Use would be $2,000 with }1! off of subsequent applications. The Environmental Review Fee is dependent on project valuation: project value less than $100,000 is a $200 fee (1/2 of $400.00 full fee) and project value over $100,000 isa $500.00 fee (1/2 of $1000.00 full fee). Detailed information regarding the land use application submittal is provided in the attached handouts In addition to the required land use permits, separate construction, and building permits would be required; The review of these permits may occur concurrently with the review of the land use permits, but cannot be issued prior to the completion of any appeal periods. Conditional Use Criteria: In order to obtain approval of a conditional use and expansion of the conditional use, the proposal must satisfy specific criteria. The purpose of a conditional use permit is . to allow certain uses in districts from which they are normally prohibited. The evaluation of the proposed use must ~ deemed consistent with other existing and potential uses within the general area of the site. It is the applicant's responsibility to adequately demonstrate the facts justifying the approval of the conditional use permit based on the use's compatibility with ALL of the following criteria (RMC section 4-9-030G): • Comprehensive Plan • Community Need • Effect on Adjacent Properties, including lot coverage, yards and height • Compatibility • Parking • Traffic • Noise, Glare • Landscaping • Accessory Uses • Conversion • Public Improvements The criteria listed above must be clearly and thoroughly substantiated. Staff examines the existing uses located adjacent to the subject site when evaluating the conditional use criteria. It is the burden of the applicant to demonstrate that this site is appropriate for the use proposed. It is important to note that staff is only able to make a recommendation and that the Hearing Examiner makes the final decision for a conditional use permit. A handout listing all of the City's Development related fees in attached for your review. cc: Jennifer Henning R-8 R-10 ZONING PIBIPW TI!CBNICAL SBIlVICI!S JlIZ8I04 R-8 ". R-8 ~ rn Q) > -< ....c:: -+-> m a ~ = [l ..... ~ ~ ~ rn Z Q) ~ > -< ....c:: ~ M -+-> rn S LQ a ~ Q) > -< ....c:: -+-> co a ~ SE 172nd St. 14 .. 32 T23N RSE W V2 -- --Renton Cit;y 1.Imlt,s H4 29 T23N R5E W 1/2 5329 PACIFIC CORPORATION 25,2005 City of Renton Development Services Division 1055 South Grady Way Renton, WA 98055 DEVELOPMENT P CITY OF AENT~~NING AUG 262005 RECEIVED Re: Request for Conditional Use Permit to allow 59' 11" Type 1 Wireless Communication Facility at First Presbyterian Church of Renton; 2640 Benson Road South; APN #2923059102; T-Mobile Site #SE4663, "Benson Road Monopole/Church" Dear Permitting Authorities; This application is being submitted on behalf of VoiceStream PCS III Corp. (T -Mobile) in support of a proposed T-Mobile site known as SE4663, Benson Road Monopole. The proposed Wireless Communication Facility (WCF) would have a height of 59 feet, 11 inches in overall height, and would be classified as a "Monopole 1" in accordance with Renton Municipal Code (RMC) Section 4-4-140 "Wireless Communication Facilities". The proposed WCF would be developed on the south-central portion of a 4.02-acre tract owned by First Presbyterian Church of Renton, located at 2640 Benson Road South. The subject parcel is located on the east side of Benson Road South, in the vicinity of the intersection of Benson Road with South 26th Street in Renton. Area Zoning and Context The subject tract is developed with a 10,899 square foot church facility, a parking lot, and a small storage building. The subject tract is zoned Residential, 8 Dwelling Units / Acre (R-8). It is adjoined on the north by property zoned Residential Multi-Family (RM-F) and developed with the Westgate Condominiums. The tract is adjoined on the east by property zoned R-8 and developed with Spring Glen Elementary School and Fred Nelsen Middle School. Property to the south of the subject tract, south of South 27th Street, is zoned R-8 and developed with single family residences. The area to the southwest of the subject tract, on the (south) west side of Benson Road South, is developed with single family residences within the jurisdiction of King County, and is zoned R-8 SO. The area immediately west of the subject tract, across Benson Road South, is zoned R-8 and developed with single family residences in the Victoria Hills subdivision in the area south of South 23rd Street. The area north of South 23rd Street, on the west side of Benson Road is zoned RM-F and developed with the Hillside Village Apartment / Condominium development. The proposed WCF support structure would be located in an area approximately 15 feet north of the existing church building. The antenna support structure will be constructed as 208 WESTLAKE AVENUE N SEATTLE WA 9Bl 09 TEL. 206·490·3800 FAX. 206-490-3839 a 24-inch diameter, dark bronze pole structure with an overall height of 59 feet, 11 inches. Three antennas would be located inside an "RF-friendly" "radome" at the top of the structure, which would hide them from view. Because the antennas must be mechanically "down-tilted" to a position that exceeds the diameter of the radome enclosure, a portion of the radome would be open and the antennas visible. In that area, the antennas will be painted dark brown to match the color of the pole. Two shoebox- style parking lot lights, also bronze in color, would be mounted to the pole at a position 24 feet above ground level (AGL). These lights would replace an existing light fixture that is currently mounted in this area on a wood pole. Associated radio base transmitting system (BTS) equipment would be located within a new stick-built II-foot (east-west) by 34-foot 10 inch (north-south) (383 square foot) outbuilding approximately 10 feet north of the WCF support structure. The proposed outbuilding would replace an existing 5-foot x 9-foot utility shed in this area of the church property. The proposed storage building is being constructed to a size that would accommodate T-Mobile's BTS equipment within the south 14 feet of the building; the northern 20 + feet of the structure would be used for storage of church equipment. Access to the BTS equipment area for T -Mobile technicians would be via a standard 4 foot "man-door" on the east side of the shed, facing the church parking lot. An 8 foot (tall) x 7 foot (wide) overhead door, also on the east side of the shed, and approximately 14 feet north of the T-Mobile entrance, would provide access to the church's storage area. The two portions of the building would be separated by an interior wall .. The proposed storage building will be constructed in a style more typical of a residential structure than the common wireless equipment shelter, and would have an exterior finish of"HardiPlank"@ fiber-cement horizontal lap siding, painted to match the existing church building. The roof would be a low-angle (1 Y2: 12) pitched roof with composite shingles. The following narrative addresses conformance with all applicable standards ofRMC 4- 4-140 F., "Standards and Requirements for All Types of Wireless Communications Facilities", and a comprehensive description ofthe other sites that have been examined for placement of a wireless facility to provide wireless T -Mobile coverage to the surrounding area. WIRELESS COMMUNICATION FACILITIES M. Monopole I: A wireless communication support structure which consists of a freestanding support structure, less than sixty feet (60') in height, erected to support wireless communication antennas and connecting appurtenances. CUP Application for Wireless Comm. Facility 2640 S. Benson Road T-Mobile Site SE4663 Benson Road /Church Monopole Page 2 of 17 Conformance with RMC 4-4-140 F, "Standards and Requirements for All Types of Wireless Communications Facilities" A narrative which addresses the proposed facility's confonnance with all of the applicable standards ofRMC 4-4-140 F, follows. 1. Equipment Shelters or Cabinets: A shelter or cabinet used to house radio electronic equipment and the associated cabling connecting the equipment shelter or cabinet to the support structure shall be contained wholly within a building or structure, or otherwise appropriately concealed, camouflaged or located underground. When they cannot be located in buildings or underground, equipment shelters or cabinets shall be fenced, screened and landscaped in conformance with RMC 4-4-070, Landscaping. Landscaping shall include a minimum fifteen foot (15') sight obscuring landscape buffer around the accessory equipment facility. Accessory equipment facilities located on the roof of any building shall be enclosed so as to be shielded from view. Response: As shown in submitted plans, T -Mobile proposes to place the base transmitting system (BTS) equipment cabinets within a new completely enclosed 383 square foot stick-built dual-purpose outbuilding structure which will be constructed approximately 25 feet north of the existing church building, immediately adjacent to the west side of the parking lot. As noted above, rather than placing a standard wireless equipment shelter in this area, the new structure is being constructed of residential building materials ("HardiPlank"® fiber-cement horizontal lap siding, painted to match the existing church building and a low angle roof with composite shingles) to blend with the church building and the surrounding residential area. Because the proposed outbuilding is residential in appearance and because it will be shared with the church, fencing of the area has not been proposed. As shown on the submitted landscape plan, small arbor vitae will be placed around the perimeter of the shelter to provide visual relief of the long exterior walls. Cabling between the proposed antenna support structure and the BTS cabinets will be placed entirely underground. 2. Visual Impact: Site location and development shall preserve the pre-existing character of the surrounding buildings and land uses and the zone district to the extent consistent with the function of the communications equipment. Wireless communication towers shall be integrated through location and design to blend in with the existing characteristics of the site to the extent practical. Existing on-site vegetation shall be preserved or improved, and disturbance of the existing topography shall be minimized, unless such disturbance would result in less visual impact of the site to the surrounding area. Response: As shown on .submitted plans and noted above, the proposed antenna support structure is being constructed to have the appearance of a parking lot light and will replace an existing light at this location. The antennas will be hidden within an "RF friendly" radome that will be integrated into the top of the proposed pole. It should be CUP Application for Wireless Comm. Facility 2640 S. Benson Road T-Mobile Site SE4663 Benson Road /Church Monopole Page 3 of 17 noted that the radome surrounding the antennas will reduce their performance somewhat. However, this measure is being taken to provide a facility that blends with the church development and the surrounding residential area. As also shown on submitted plans, on site vegetation in the vicinity of the proposed outbuilding will be maintained. Emerald green arbor vitae are being added around the proposed dual purpose equipment shed in order to break up the mass of the building. 3. Screening of Accessory Equipment Shelters and Cabinets: Accessory equipment facilities used to house wireless communication equipment should be located within buildings or placed underground when possible. When they cannot be located in buildings, equipment shelters or cabinets shall be fenced, screened and landscaped to screen views from adjacent residential or commercial zoned properties. Any landscaping shall be in conformance with RMC 4-4-070, Landscaping. Accessory equipment facilities located on the roof of any building shall be enclosed so as to be shielded from view. Accessory equipment facilities may not be enclosed with exposed metal surfaces. Response: As noted above, a stick-built dual purpose shed is being constructed to house T-Mobile's ground-based equipment and also to provide space for storage of church equipment. The first preference would have been to place the proposed ground based equipment inside the existing church building. However, there is no room within the existing building for the BTS equipment, and in fact, the church representative indicated that the church was in need of additional storage space, so the dual purpose equipment shed is being proposed. This will help resolve the storage needs of the church while also providing a fully-enclosed residential style structure for placement ofT-Mobile's ground based equipment. The new equipment facility will have no exposed metal surfaces. 4. Maximum Noise Levels: No equipment shall be operated so as to produce noise in levels above forty five (45) dB as measured from the nearest property line on which the attached wireless communication facility is located. Operation of a back-up power generator in the event of power failure or the testing of a back-up generator between 8 a.m. and 9 p.m. are exempt from this standard. No testing of back-up generators shall occur between the hours of 9 p.m. and 8 a.m. Response: Backup power for the proposed WCF will be provided with backup batteries; no generator is being proposed at this site. As noted in the acoustic study prepared by SSA Acoustic Consultants which is being submitted with this application, the proposed site will conform with City noise standards. As noted in the report, the predicted sound level as measured from the nearest property line would conform with the limits established by the Code. 5. Fencing: Security fencing, if used, shall be painted or coated with nonreflective color. Fencing shall comply with the requirements listed in RMC 4-4-040, Fences and Hedges. Response: As noted previously, T-Mobile's equipment will be enclosed entirely within a shed with a residential appearance; fencing is not proposed. CUP Application for Wireless Comm. Facility 2640 S. Benson Road T-Mobile Site SE4663 Benson Road (Church Monopole Page 4 of 17 6. Lighting: Towers shall not be artificially lighted, unless required by the FAA or other applicable authority. If lighting is required, the governing authority may review the available lighting alternatives and approve the design that would cause the least disturbance to the surrounding views. Security lighting for the equipment shelters or cabinets and other on-the-ground ancillary equipment is also permitted, as long as it is appropriately down shielded to keep light within the boundaries of the site. Response: According to the Airspace® report for the proposed WCF, the subject site would require notification to the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) due to its location within one of the approach surfaces of the Renton Municipal Airport. However, because the ground elevation in the surrounding area exceeds the allowable height relative to the elevation of the existing runway, and because the proposed WCF would have a lesser height than surrounding trees, T -Mobile regulatory personnel believe that the proposed antenna support structure will receive a "determination of no hazard" from the FAA, and not require lighting or marking. Should the FAA determine that the WCF requires obstruction lighting, T -Mobile will work with the City to ensure that the least visually-intrusive lighting possible is installed. Work lighting for the ground-based equipment would be within a fully enclosed building and would be operated only during night time visits by support personnel. In addition, the work light would be on a timer so that it would automatically shut off within an hour of maintenance staff s departure. 7. Advertising Prohibited: No lettering, symbols, images, or trademarks large enough to be legible to occupants of vehicular traffic on any adjacent roadway shall be placed on or affixed to any part of a telecommunications tower, antenna array or antenna, other than as required by FCC regulations regarding tower registration or other applicable law. Antenna arrays may be located on previously approved signs or billboards without alteration of the existing advertising or sign. Response: As shown on submitted plans, the only signage that would be placed on the site would be radio frequency warning and site identification signs as required by the Federal Communications Commission (FCC). 8. Building Standards: Wireless communication support structures shall be constructed so as to meet or exceed the most recent Electronic Industries Association/Telecommunications Industries Association (EIAITIA) 222 Revision F Standard entitled: "Structural Standards for Steel Antenna Towers and Antenna Supporting Structures" (or equivalent), as it may be updated or amended. Prior to issuance of a building permit the Building Official shall be provided with an engineer's certification that the support structure's design meets or exceeds those standards. A wireless communications support structure shall be located in such a manner that if the structure within property boundaries and avoid habitable structures, public streets, utility lines and other telecommunications towers. Response: As noted on submitted plans, the proposed support structure would conform with (EIAITIA) 222 Revision F, the International Building Code, and all other applicable CUP Application for Wireless Comm. Facility 2640 S. Benson Road T-Mobile Site SE4663 Benson Road /Church Monopole Page 5 of 17 codes. Appropriate certification of the facility's design will be submitted with the application for building permit. 9. Radio Frequency Standards: The applicant shall ensure that the WCF will not cause localized interference with the reception of area television or radio broadcasts. If on review the City finds that the WCF interferes with such reception, and if such interference is not remedied within thirty (30) days, the City may revoke or modify this permit. Response: T-Mobile's FCC licensed frequencies are in the range of 1885-1895 MHz (receive) and 1965-1975 MHz (send), and as such are allocated federally licensed radio spectrum. This licensure is the appropriate assurance that the proposed facility will not interfere with other federally-licensed frequencies. G. STANDARDS FOR SPECIFIC TYPES OF WIRELESS FACILITIES: For definitions of specific types of wireless communication facilities, see RMC 4-11- 230. Development standards for specific types of wireless communication facilities shall be as follows: Response: Per RMC 4-11-230, the proposed WCF is classified as a "Monopole I". Applicable requirements that are not addressed elsewhere in RMC 4-4-140 are found in the summary table under RMC 4-4-140 G. Those requirements, and the proposed development's conformity with the requirements, are listed and addressed below. Maximum Height and Area: All wireless communication facilities and attached wireless communication facilities must comply with the Airport zoning regulations, as listed in RMC 4-3-020. Response: The proposed facility would not be located in either Airport Safety Zones 1 through 4, or the Airport Influence Area as defined by RMC 4-3-020, and would thus be exempt from the requirements of those prescribed zones. As noted previously, according to T-Mobile's preliminary Airspace® analysis of the proposed WCF, the ground elevation of the proposed site relative to the elevation of the runway causes the proposed WCF to require notification to the FAA. Final notification will be provided to the FAA prior to construction of the proposed WCF, and applicable requirements for marking or lighting will be followed. Maximum Height and Area, cont'd: Monopole I Facility Maximum Height: Less than 60 feet for all zones. Response: The proposed Monopole I will have an overall height of 59 feet, 11 inches, thereby complying with this requirement. CUP Application for Wireless Comm. Facility 2640 S. Benson Road T-Mobile Site SE4663 Benson Road /Church Monopole Page 6 of 17 Maximum Height and Area, cont'd : Macro Facilities are the largest attached communication facilities allowed on a Monopole I Facility. Facilities may exceed the height limitation by 16 feet, or in the case of existing structures the antennas may extend 16 feet above the existing structures. Response: The proposed Monopole I will not exceed the overall height of 59 feet, 11 inches as allowed in residential zoning districts. Antenna Height: Antennas may not exceed more than 15 feet above their supporting structure, monopole, lattice tower, building or other structure. Antennas equal to or less than 15 feet in height or up to 4 inches in diameter may be a component of a Monopole I Facility. Antennas which extend above the wireless communications support structure shall not be calculated as part of the height of the Monopole I wireless communications support structure. For example, the maximum height of antennas which may be installed on the support structure could be 15 feet, making the maximum permitted height of the support structure and antennas 75 feet (60 feet plus 15 feet). Response: As noted above, because of the residential character of the area surrounding the subject site, the antennas will be integrated into the proposed WCF support structure, and enclosed within an "RF friendly" radome or "shroud". The antennas for the proposed facility therefore conform with the height provisions listed in RMC 4-4-140 G for Monopole I facilities. Landscaping: See subsectionF of this Section, Standards. (Monopole I) Shall be landscaped in conformance with RMC 4-4-070, Landscaping. A minimum landscaping area of 15 feet shall be required surrounding the facility, or equivalent screening as approved by the Administrator. Response: As shown on submitted plans and noted above, the proposed antenna support structure will be designed to have the appearance of a parking lot light so that it blends in with the existing development on the subject property. Antennas will be shrouded within the pole, and parking lot lights will be placed at a level appropriate for parking lot lighting so that the wireless components blend in with the surrounding development. The associated BTS equipment will be completely enclosed within a stick-built shed that will be used for both T -Mobile and to meet the storage needs of the church. The area in which the shed will be located is screened by a number of mature maples that will not be disturbed with the construction of the proposed facility. Arbor vitae are being proposed at 4-6 foot intervals as foundation plantings around the storage shed, in order to reduce the mass of the long north-south wall of the building. We believe that this mode of screening is more in keeping with the character of the existing church and surrounding area than a typical fenced and landscaped equipment enclosure, and therefore request Administrative approval of the proposed screening as shown on submitted plans. CUP Application for Wireless Cornrn. Facility 2640 S. Benson Road T-Mobile Site SE4663 Benson Road /Church Monopole Page 7 of 17 Landscaping shall include trees, shrubs and ground cover. The required landscaped areas shall inClude an irrigation system. Response: As noted above, BTS equipment will be completely enclosed within a stick- built shed that will be used for both T-Mobile and to meet the storage needs of the church. Because the ground equipment for the site will be fully enclosed within the storage building, a reduction in the landscaping requirement has been requested to allow planting of arbor vitae to break up the mass of the proposed building. An irrigation plan will be included in the building permit plans for the subject site. H. AIRPORT RESTRICTIONS -NOTICE TO FAA: A Notice of Proposed Construction shall be submitted to the FAA a minimum of thirty (30) days prior to the issuance of any building permit for any wireless communication support structure or attached wireless communication facilities. Response: As noted previously, T-Mobile has prepared a preliminary Airspace® analysis of the subject site, which indicates that notification of the FAA will be required. A Notice of Proposed Construction wiil be submitted to the FAA a minimum of thirty (30) days prior to the issuance of the required building permit. I. OBSOLESCENCE: Any wireless communications facility or attached wireless communications facility that is no longer needed and its use is discontinued shall be reported immediately by service provider to the Administrator. Discontinued facilities shall be decommissioned and removed by the facility owner within six (6) months ofthe date it ceases to be operational or if the facility falls into disrepair, and the site restored to its pre-existing condition. The Administrator may approve an extension of an additional six (6) months if good cause is demonstrated by the facility owner. Response: T -Mobile acknowledges this requirement and will do so in the unlikely event of operations being ceased. J. COLLOCATION REQUIRED: 1. Evaluation of Existing Support Structures: No new wireless communications support structure shall be permitted unless the applicant demonstrates to the reasonable satisfaction of the governing authority that no existing tower or structure can accommodate the applicant's proposed antenna. Evidence submitted to demonstrate that an existing tower or structure can accommodate the applicant's proposed antenna may consist of any of the following: a. No existing towers or structures are located within the geographic area required to meet applicant's engineering requirements. b. Existing towers or structures are not of sufficient height to meet applicant's engineering requirements. CUP Application for Wireless Comm. Facility 2640 S. Benson Road T-Mobile Site SE4663 Benson Road /Church Monopole Page 8 of 17 c. Existing towers or structures do not have sufficient structural strength to support applicant's proposed antenna and related equipment. d. The applicant's proposed antenna would cause electromagnetic interference with the antenna on the existing towers or structures, or the antenna on the existing towers or structures would cause interference with the applicant's proposed antenna. e. The fees, costs, or contractual provisions required by the owner in order to share an existing tower or structure or to adapt an existing tower or structure for sharing are unreasonable. Costs exceeding new tower development are presumed to be unreasonable. f. The applicant demonstrates that there are other limiting factors that render existing towers and structures unsuitable. Response: T -Mobile leasing and zoning personnel have been pursuing candidates that would meet the coverage objective for the proposed site since December 2004. As noted in the letter regarding the radio frequency (RF) coverage objectives for the proposed site, which is submitted with this application, the primary objective of the subject site is to provide in-vehicle coverage on Benson Road South, Puget Drive, and SR 515, and the surrounding residential areas. This is made difficult by the down slope of the terrain in this area, along with clusters of dense vegetation, which interfere with RF penetration. As shown on the zoning map exhibit submitted with this application, the entire search area is dominated by residential zoning (either Residential Multi-Family (RMF) or Residential-8 (R-8)), with small parcels near the intersection of Benson Road and Puget Drive that are developed with commercial and office uses. The dominant zoning and land use in this area is multi-family residential development. RMC 4-2- 060 (P), the allowed uses table, precludes locating wireless antennas ("micro facilities" or "macro facilities") on structures with residential units adjacent to the antennas. This precludes locating these types of facilities on any of the apartment structures in the proposed coverage area; clubhouse structures in the area were also found to be unsuitable because they have pitched roofs, which precludes placement of antennas and BTS equipment. The strip commercial areas are very densely developed, precluding construction of a Monopole I and location of ground based equipment on those tracts. In addition, the existing buildings in the commercial areas lack the structural capacity for placement of antennas, and more importantly, the BTS cabinets, on a rooftop. Because there were no suitable commercial sites available, T -Mobile also pursued a number of Seattle City Light (SCL) and Puget Sound Energy (PSE) electric transmission poles in the area east of Benson Road near Puget Drive. All of these poles were rejected by SCL and PSE because they either lacked the structural integrity for placement of T- Mobile's equipment, or were carrying voltages in excess of those allowed for placement ofPCS equipment. (Email correspondence from PSE and SCL attached). CUP Application for Wireless Comm. Facility 2640 S. Benson Road T-Mobile Site SE4663 Benson Road /Church Monopole Page 9 of 17 Finally, RMC 4-2-060 (P) allows siting Monopole I wireless facilities on residential tracts of more than one acre, but precludes locating a monopole within 100 feet of another residentially zoned lot. Other residentially-zoned tracts within the proposed service area that were of adequate size to meet the size and setback criteria were the PSE shop facility located between Benson Road and Puget Drive near SE 21 st Street (extended), and the PSE GaslNorthwest Pipeline facility at the northwest comer of SR515 and 21 st Street. However, the PSE shop property lies in a forested depression, which would require development of a pole much taller than allowed as a Monopole I, making it unacceptable for RF propagation. The PSE gas facility and the Northwest Pipeline property are also unsuitable due to the numerous gas pipelines on these properties. 2. Cooperation in Collocation Efforts: A permittee shall cooperate with other WCF providers in collocating additional antennas on support structures and/or on existing buildings provided said proposed collocators have received a building permit for such use at said site from the City. A permittee shall exercise good faith in collocating with other providers and sharing the permitted site, provided such shared use does not give rise to a substantial technical level of impairment of the ability to provide the permitted use (i.e., a significant interference in broadcast or reception capabilities as opposed to a competitive conflict or financial burden). Such good faith shall include sharing technical information to evaluate the feasibility of collocation. In the event a dispute arises as to whether a permittee has exercised good faith in accommodating other users, the City may require a third party technical study at the expense of either or both the applicant and permittee. Response: T-Mobile understands this requirement and would cooperate with other providers who wished to collocate on the proposed WCF. The pole has been sized (24 inch diameter) to allow collocation of a second wireless service provider. 3. Reasonable Efforts: All applicants shall demonstrate reasonable efforts in developing a collocation alternative for their proposal. Response: As outlined above, T -Mobile tried without success to locate antennas on existing electric transmission facilities or on commercial tracts in the coverage area. These attempts were not successful due to the design limitations of the transmission lines and commercial buildings in the area. K. PERMIT LIMITATIONS: 1. Maintenance Required: The applicant shall maintain the WCF to standards that may be imposed by the City at the time of the granting of a permit. Such maintenance shall include, but shall not be limited to, maintenance of the paint, structural integrity and landscaping. If the applicant fails to maintain the facility, the City may undertake the maintenance at the expense of the applicant or terminate the permit, at its sole option. Response: T-Mobile acknowledges this requirement and will maintain the facility in accordance with City standards. CUP Application for Wireless Comm. Facility 2640 S. Benson Road T-Mobile Site SE4663 Benson Road /Church Monopole Page 10 of 17 2. Compliance with Federal Standards for Radio Frequency Emissions: The applicant shall comply with Federal (FCC) standards for radio frequency emissions. Within sixty (60) days after the issuance of its building permit, the applicant shall submit a project implementation report which provides cumulative field measurements of radio frequency emissions of all antennas installed at the subject site and compares the results with established Federal standards. Said report shall be subject to review and approval of the Administrator for consistency with Federal standards. If on review, the City finds that the WCF does not meet Federal standards, the City may revoke or modify this permit. Response: T-Mobile acknowledges this requirement and would cooperate with appropriate Federal authorities should the WCF not meet applicable standards. 3. Notice to City of Change of Ownership: The applicant shall notify the Department of all changes in ownership or operation of the facility within sixty (60) days ofthe change. (Ord. 4666, 6-2-1997, Amd. Ord. 4689, 11-24-1997) Response: T-Mobile acknowledges this requirement and will provide appropriate notice in the unlikely event of a change in ownership or operations. Conditional Use Criteria Conformance with Comprehensive Plan The proposed use shall be compatible with the general purpose, goals, objectives and standards of the comprehensive plan, the zoning ordinance and any other plan, program, map or ordinance of the City of Renton. Response: There is little recent data in the City's Comprehensive Plan relative to wireless communication facilities. In fact, at the time of the Plan's writing, there were only 2 carriers in the Seattle market, and the Plan predicted that 20% of Washington's population would be served by cellular phones by the 2005-2010 planning horizon. The amount of growth in wireless has far outpaced the predicted demand, and today, most of the state of Washington is served by wireless communication services. Comprehensive Plan policies specific to wireless are found in the Utilities Section of the Plan. The Comprehensive Plan states an overall goal for utility services to "Facilitate the development and maintenance of all utilities at the appropriate levels of service to accommodate the growth that is anticipated in the City of Renton". Response: It is important to note that one of the factors driving T-Mobile to place WCFs in or near residential areas is to provide improved triangUlation (and accuracy in finding a wireless caller in distress) in accordance with FCC regulations for Wireless E911 service. By developing the proposed WCF with a parking lot light style fayade and complying with the other applicable provisions of the Renton Land Use Code relative to camouflaging and screening the proposed facility, T -Mobile CUP Application for Wireless Comm. Facility 2640 S. Benson Road T-Mobile Site SE4663 Benson Road /Church Monopole Page 11 of 17 would reduce the aesthetic impacts of the proposed WCF and comply with this policy of the Comprehensive Plan. Specific to communication facilities, there is one identified objective and several policies. Telecommunications Objective U-J calls for the city to "Promote the timely and orderly expansion of all forms of telecommunication services within the City of Renton and the remainder of its Planning Area". Response: The City has instituted land use regulations to promote appropriate expansions of the wireless system. By complying with these regulations, T-Mobile will expand its service to the proposed coverage area in a manner that is appropriate to the surrounding development. The Comprehensive Plan includes the following policies relative to siting telecommunication facilities. Policy U-lOO. Require that the siting and location oftelecommunication facilities be accomplished in a manner that minimizes adverse impacts on the environment and adjacent land uses. Response: The proposed WCF is located in an area that meets all applicable setbacks and zoning requirements. In addition, the proposed Monopole I is specifically designed to hide the antennas and have the appearance of a parking lot light, and thereby minimizes the visual impact of the proposed facility. As demonstrated in the other documentation submitted with this application, the proposed WCF will also have no noise impacts and will conform with applicable regulations relative to RF emissions. The proposed WCF therefore conforms with Policy U-I 00. Policy U-lOl. Require that cellular communication structures and towers be sensitively sited and designed to diminish aesthetic impacts, and be collocated on existing structures and towers whenever possible and practical. Response: The proposed WCF conforms with Policy U-lOi. As outlined in detail above, T-Mobile has pursued a number of non-residential alternatives (commercial buildings and utility transmission structures) in trying to collocate on a non- residential structure. After exhausting these locations, T-Mobile has proposed a WCF that is designed to keep aesthetic impacts to a minimum and blend into its surroundings. Policy U-102. Pursue the continued development of a wireless internet communication grid throughout the City for the use and enjoyment of Renton residents, employees and visitors. Response: Approval of the application for the proposed WCF will encourage development of wireless internet services available from T-Mobile and perhaps one additional wireless provider. As stated above, the proposed application meets the City's goals for developing a WCF in an area-appropriate manner while making a variety of wireless services available to area T-Mobile subscribers. CUP Application for Wireless Comm. Facility . 2640 S. Benson Road T-Mobile Site SE4663 Benson Road /Church Monopole Page 12 of 17 Policy U-t03. Encourage healthy competition among telecommunication systems for provision of current and future telecommunication services. Response: Approval of this application will improve service for customers of T- Mobile and perhaps one additional wireless provider in the vicinity of the subject site. Community Need There shall be a community need for the proposed use at the proposed location. In the determination of community need, the reviewing official shall consider the following factors among all other relevant information: The proposed location shall not result in either the detrimental over- concentration of a particular use within the City or within the immediate area of the proposed use. The proposed location is suited for the proposed use. Effect on Adjacent Properties: The proposed use at the proposed location shall not result in substantial or undue adverse effects on adjacent property. Response: As noted in the Radio Frequency Analysis and demonstrated in the RF propagation exhibits submitted with this application, the subject site has been selected to improve coverage in the vicinity of Benson Road South, in the area south ofPuget Drive, and extending to SR515. In addition to providing better signal strength for improved call quality, the proposed site will improve triangulation for Wireless E911 service in accordance with T-Mobile's obligations under its FCC license. There are no otherWCFs or collocatable facilities in the surrounding area, thus the proposed WCF is not an over-concentration of such facilities. As described in some detail and demonstrated with the graphic materials submitted with this application, the subject WCF has been sited and designed to look like a parking lot light fixture specifically to minimize any adverse effects on surrounding properties. In addition to the facility's design, it is setback 100 feet from surrounding residential properties and is well hidden from view of the roadway by substantial existing trees on the site. Similarly, the ground-based BTS equipment will be hidden within a stick-built equipment shed that will provide space for the applicant and the church's storage needs in an aesthetically pleasing manner. Additional Items for Review Compatibility: The proposed use shall be compatible with the residential scale and character of the neighborhood. Response: The proposed WCF will have an overall height of 59 feet, 11 inches, in accordance with the restrictions ofRMC 4-4-140 G. Those restrictions, along with the 100 foot setback from adjoining residential properties, as prescribed for such facilities in residential districts, have been determined by the City to be reasonable limits for WCFs in residential areas. In addition to meeting the letter of the regulation, the proposed use will be disguised as a parking lot light, and the antennas will be hidden CUP Application for Wireless Comm. Facility 2640 S. Benson Road T-Mobile Site SE4663 Benson Road /Church Monopole Page 13 of 17 to enhance the compatibility of the proposed WCF with the surrounding residentially zoned properties. Parking: Parking under the building structure should be encouraged. Lot coverage may be increased to as much as 75% of the lot coverage requirement of the zone in which the proposed use is located if all parking is provided underground or within the structure. Response: Under normal operating conditions, one or two technician visits per month would be anticipated. There is adequate existing parking at the church for the proposed use. Traffic: Traffic and circulation patterns of vehicles and pedestrians relating to the proposed use and surrounding area shall be reviewed for potential effects on, and to ensure safe movement in, the surrounding area. Response: As noted above, the proposed WCF would have one or two technician visits per month. This is far below the traffic generation of one single family residence (average of 10 trips per day); thus the proposed WCF would have no discernible effect on traffic, circulation patterns, or pedestrian movements on the subj ect tract or surrounding area. Noise, Glare: Potential noise, light and glare impacts shall be evaluated based on the location of the proposed use on the lot and the location of on-site parking areas, outdoor recreational areas and refuse storage areas. Response: As noted above, the proposed WCF will not rely on a backup generator, and will conform with the requirements ofRMC 4-4-140(F)(4) in regard to noise. As noted previously, the preliminary Airspace® report for the proposed WCF indicates that the subject site would require notification to the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) due to its location within one of the approach surfaces of the Renton Municipal Airport. However, because the ground elevation in the surrounding area exceeds the allowable height relative to the elevation of the existing runway, and because the proposed WCF would have a lesser height than surrounding trees, T- Mobile regulatory personnel believe that the proposed antenna support structure will receive a "determination of no hazard" from the FAA, and not require lighting or marking. Should the FAA determine that the WCF requires obstruction lighting, T- Mobile will work with the City to ensure that the least visually-intrusive lighting possible is installed. Landscaping: Landscaping shall be provided in all areas not occupied by buildings or paving. The Hearing Examiner may require additional landscaping to buffer adjacent properties from potentially adverse effects of the proposed use. Response: The existing church property has stands of large trees, particularly on the north and westerly part of the subject tract, which screen the upper parking area from residential views. Also, as noted above, the proposed WCF equipment structure is being constructed of residential building materials, painted to match the existing CUP Application for Wireless Comm. Facility 2640 S. Benson Road T-Mobile Site SE4663 Benson Road /Church Monopole Page 14 of 17 church building and designed with a low angle shingled roof to blend with the church building and the surrounding residential area. Because the proposed outbuilding is residential in appearance and would be shared with the church, fencing has not been proposed. As shown on the submitted landscape plan, small arbor vitae will be placed around the perimeter of the shed/shelter to provide visual relief of the long west exterior walls. Cabling between the proposed antenna support structure and the BTS cabinets will be placed entirely underground. T-Mobile is requesting Administrative approval to waive the requirement for a 15 foot perimeter landscape buffer because the ground based equipment will be fully enclosed within this stick-built shed. Accessory Uses: Accessory uses to conditional uses such as day schools, auditoriums used for social and sport activities, health centers, convents, preschool facilities, convalescent homes and others of a similar nature shall be considered to be separate uses and shall be subject to the provisions of the use district in which they are located. Response: Not applicable to the present application. Conversion: No existing building or structure shall be converted to a conditional use unless such building or structure complies, or is brought into compliance, with the development standards. Response: The proposed WCF will not occupy any part of the existing church structure. Public Improvements: The proposed use and location shall be adequately served by and not impose an undue burden on any public improvements, facilities, utilities and services. Approval of a conditional use permit may be conditioned upon the provision and/or guarantee by the applicant of necessary public improvements, facilities, utilities and/or services. Response: As noted throughout this submittal, the proposed WCF will not place an undue burden on existing utilities, roads, or other public facilities in the area. Construction Mitigation Description Proposed construction dates (begin and end dates) Response: It is anticipated that construction of the proposed WCF would begin shortly after approval of a building permit. Approximately one month would be required to complete construction. Hours and days of operation Response: The proposed WCF will operate 24 hours a day, 7 days a week. Because the facility is unmanned and has no discernible off-site impacts, it would have no effect on the surrounding residential area. CUP Application for Wireless Comm. Facility 2640 S. Benson Road T-Mobile Site SE4663 Benson Road /Church Monopole Page 15 of 17 Proposed hauling/transportation routes Response: Little hauling or impacts on the street system would result from development or operation ofthe proposed facility. Access to the site is available from Benson Road South, via a fully paved driveway and parking lot that surrounds the existing church. Measures to be implemented to minimize dust, traffic and transportation impacts, erosion, mud, noise, and other noxious characteristics. Response: The only activities associated with the proposed WCF that would be discernible off site would be those associated with construction. During construction, temporary erosion and silt control (TESC) measures would be put in place, as shown on the abbreviated drainage plan (ADP) submitted with the plan set in support of this application. Appropriate practices, including covering of soil stockpiles during rain events, lapping filter fabric, and seeding disturbed areas prior to the onset of the rainy season, are prescribed in the ADP. Any special hours proposed for construction or hauling (i.e. weekends, late nights) Response: Construction activities would occur during typical business hours, and would likely occur on weekends as well as weekdays. However, T -Mobile construction personnel would work around activities at the church. Preliminary traffic control plan Response: Construction and operation of the proposed WCF will not affect traffic on public streets in the area. Therefore, no traffic control plan has been submitted. If your project requires the use of cranes, please contact the City's Airport Manager at (425) 430-7471 to determine whether Federal Aviation Administration notification will be required. Response: Such notice will be provided prior to commencement of construction activities at the proposed site. The proposed WCF will conform with the applicable requirements ofRMC 4-2-060 (P), RMC 4-4-140, RMC 4-11-230 the implementing regulations of the Comprehensive Plan as it relates to the development of wireless facilities and conditional uses. In summary, T- Mobile has demonstrated, through the written materials, RF supporting documents, site plan, and graphic exhibits that the proposed WCF will conform with the intent and spirit of the Comprehensive Plan and applicable portions of the Renton Municipal Code relative to wireless facilities. CUP Application for Wireless Comm. Facility 2640 S. Benson Road T-Mobile Site SE4663 Benson Road /Church Monopole Page 16 ofl7 Should there be any questions regarding the submitted materials, please do not hesitate to contact me. I may be reached by phone at (425) 346-0128, or via email at mchaney@odelia.com. Attachments ;;J2 U)fl2 Madeline w. Chane~ ~p Applicant for VoiceStream PCS III Corp. dba T-Mobile CUP Application for Wireless Corom. Facility 2640 S. Benson Road T-Mobile Site SE4663 Benson Road /Church Monopole Page 17 of 17 Sent: Friday, January 21, 2005 11 :45 AM To: 'Gasser, Tim' Subject: SE04663 / Eagle Ridge Tim, We think these are yours, but not sure. We looked over the map you sent, but we are still unsure. What do you think? Are these viable candidates.? Bjorn Morfin / SecuraSite LLC 1631 NE Broadway, PMB 100 , Portland, OR 97232 T 503.781.9762 / F 425.952.9481 E bmorlin@securasite.net From: Gasser, Tim [mailto:tim.gasser@Pse.com] Sent: Monday, January 31,20058:38 AM To: Bjorn Morfin Cc: Putt, Michael Subject: RE: SE04663 / Eagle Ridge Bjorn, The poles in question are part of our Talbot Hill -Berrydale 230 kV line. 230 kV has been been classified as not available for co-location. Tim EMAIL FROM PSE -----Original Message----- From: June Jacobson [mailto:June.Jacobson@Seattle.Gov] Sent: Thursday, January 06, 2005 2:39 PM To: bmorfin@securasite.net Cc: MichaeI.Putt@T-Mobile.com Subject: Re: FW: T-Mobile Site SE04663/Eagle Ridge Yes, this is an SCL tower. I had understood you to say it was in Redmond where SCL doesn't have any towers. The tower number is also unusual as there are only a few in the entire system with that type of number. Next time rll have to ask for the site name/number and more detail about the location. It is also helpful to have the SCL P .M.# assigned to the project for quick identification. Originally, SCL gave preliminary acceptance for design of this site, but after further scrutiny and consideration, decided that it was not a good candidate. SCL's experience with former BPA towers has been that they are not robust enough for a tower extension or extra weight and torsion of additional attachments. The wide lattice brac- ing at the top of this tower further reduces its capacity for extensions, antenna arrays and coax. The powerlines that criss-cross the upper portion of the tower create clearance risks for attachments and workers under the transmission lines. Please call me if you have any questions. Thanks. June Jacobson Seattle City Light Real Estate Services (KT3012) 700 5th Ave, Suite 3300 POBox 34023 Seattle, W A 98124-4023 (206) 684-3324 Fax (206) 233-2760 EMAIL FROM SCL DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DIVISION ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST City of Renton Development Services Division 1055 South Grady Way, Renton, WA 98055 Phone: 425-430-7200 Fax: 425-430-7231 PURPOSE OF CHECKLIST: DEVELOPMENT PLANNING CITY OF RENTON AUG 262005 RECEIVED The State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA), Chapter 43.21 C RCW, requires all governmental agencies to consider the environmental impacts of a proposal before making decisions. An Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) must be prepared for all proposals with probable significant adverse impacts on the quality of the environment. The purpose of this checklist is to provide information to help you and the agency identify impacts from your proposal (and to reduce or avoid impacts from the proposal, if it can be done) and to help the agency decide whether an EIS is required. INSTRUCTIONS FOR APPLICANTS: This environmental checklist asks you to describe some basic information about your proposal. Governmental agencies use this checklist to determine whether the environmental impacts of your . proposal are significant, requiring preparation of an EIS. Answer the questions briefly, with the most precise information known, or give the best description you can. You must answer each question accurately and carefully, to the best of your knowledge. In most cases, you should be able to answer the questions from your own observations or project plans without the need to hire experts. If you really do not know the answer, or if a question dOes not apply to your proposal, write "do not knoW" or "does not apply". Complete answers to the questions now may avoid unnecessary delays later. Some questions ask about governmental regulations, such as zoning, shoreline, and landmark designations. Answer these questions if you can. If you have problems, the governmental agencies can assist you. The checklist questions apply to all parts of your proposal, even if you plan to do them over a period of time or on different parcels of land. Attach any additional information that will help describe your proposal or its environmental effects. The agency to which you submit this checklist may ask you to explain your answers or provide additional information reasonably related to determining if there may be Significant adverse impact. USE OF CHECKLIST FOR NONPROJECT PROPOSALS: Complete this checklist for nonproject proposals, even though questions may be answered "does not apply." IN ADDITION, complete the SUPPLEMENTAL SHEET FOR NONPROJECT ACTIONS (part D). For nonproject actions (actions involving decisions on poliCies, plans and programs), the references in the checklist to the words "project," "applicant," and "property or site" should be read as "proposal," "proposer," and "affected geographic area," respectively. C:\madeline\Madeline Chaney\t-mobile\t-mobile\2005 Q2 and 3\se4663 benson rd\se4663envchlst811 05.doc08I25/05 A. BACKGROUND 1 . Name of proposed project, if applicable: T -Mobile Site # SE4663, Benson Road Monopole/Church 2. Name of applicant: Madeline Chaney AICP for VOicestream PCS III Corp., dba T-Mobile 3. Address and phone number of applicant and contact person: Madeline Chaney Odelia Pacific Corporation 208 Westlake Ave. North Seattle WA 98109 4. Date checklist prepared: August 11, 2005 5. Agency requesting checklist: City of Renton Development Services Division 6. Proposed timing or schedule (including phasing, if applicable): Depending on weather, construction would commence upon approval of all applicable permits and would take approximately one month. 7. Do you have any plans for future additions, expansion, or further activity related to or connected with this proposal? If yes, explain .. Antennas or Base Transmitting System (BTS) components could be added or changed, depending on changes in technology. 8. List any environmental information you know about that has been prepared, or will be prepared, directly related to this proposal. NEPA Environmental Checklist will be prepared in accordance with Federal Communications Commission (FCC) requirements. 9. Do you know whether applications are pending for governmental approvals of other proposals directly affecting the property covered by your proposal? If yes, explain. None known. 10. List any governmental approvals or permits that will be needed for your proposal, if known. Conditional Use permit, building permit from City of Renton 11. Give brief, complete description of your proposal, including the proposed uses and the size of the project and site. The proposed Wireless Communication Facility (WCF) would be developed on the south-central portion of a 4.02-acre tract owned by First Presbyterian Church of Renton, located at 2640 C:\madeline\Madeline Chaney\t-mobile\t-mobile\2005 Q2 and 3\se4663 benson rd\se4663envchlst81105.doc 2 Benson Road South. The WCF will be composed of an antenna support structure which will be constructed as a 24-inch diameter, dark bronze pole structure with an overall height of 59 feet, 11 inches, and a 383 square foot stick-built storage building which will house base transmitting system (BTS) equipment and provide space for the Church's storage needs. The antenna support structure will be constructed to have the appearance of a parking lot light, and will be located in an area approximately 15 feet north of the existing church building. The outbuilding would be constructed approximately 10 feet north of the antenna support structure. Three antennas would be located inside an "RF-friendly" "radome" at the top of the support structure, which would hide them from view. A portion of the radome would be open and the antennas partially visible to allow for mechanical downtilt. In that area, the antennas will be painted dark brown to match the color of the pole. Two shoebox-style parking lot lights, also bronze in color, would be mounted to the pole at a position 24 feet above ground level (AGL). These lights would replace an existing light fixture that is currently mounted in this area on a wood pole. The new stick-built 11-foot (east-west) by 34-foot 10 inch (north-south) outbuilding structure would replace an existing 5' x 9' utility shed in this area of the church property. The proposed storage building is being constructed to a size that would accommodate T-Mobile's BTS equipment within the south 14 feet of the building; the northern 20 + feet of the structure would be used for storage of church equipment. Access to the BTS equipment area for T-Mobile technicians would be via a standard 4 foot "man-door" on the east side of the shed, facing the church parking lot. An 8 foot (tall) x 7 foot (wide) overhead door, also on the east side of the shed, and approximately 14 feet north of the T -Mobile entrance, would provide access to the church's storage area. The two portions of the building would be separated by an interior wall. 12. Location of the proposal. Give sufficient information for a person to understand the precise location of your proposed project, including a street address, if any, and section, township, and range if known. If a proposal would occur over a range of area, provide the range or boundaries of the site(s). Provide a legal description, site plan, vicinity map, and topographic map, if reasonably available. While you should submit any plans required by the agency, you are not required to duplicate maps or detailed plans submitted with any permit applications related to this checklist. The proposed WCF would be located on property owned by the First Presbyterian Church of Renton, located at 2640 Benson Road South, Renton WA. APN#29230591 02. B. ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS 1. EARTH a. General description of the site (circle one); flat, rollin@steep slopes, mountainous, other . b. What is the steepest slope on the site (approximate percent slope?) The north part of the church property is characterized by slopes in the range of 70 percent. The proposed WCF would be developed in an area where the slope is 15-20 percent. c. What general types of soils are found on the site (for example, clay, sand, gravel, peat, muck)? If you know the classification of agricultural soils, specify them and note any prime farmland. C:\madeline\Madeline Chaney\t-mobile\t-mobile\2005 Q2 and 3\se4663 benson rcI\se4663envchlst81105.doc 3 According to the available information, the general soil type in this area of King County is characterized by the Alderwood soil series, gravelly sandy loam. This is the most common soil classification in this part of the County, and is composed principally of gravelly till. It is granular, moderately drained and the upper layers contain numerous pellets. It is not a productive agricultural soil, and is not classified as prime farmland. d. Are there surface indications or history of unstable soils in the immediate vicinity? If so, describe. While the north and western portions of the property are classified as a moderate slide hazard according to City of Renton Slide Sensitive Areas Map, dated August 7, 2002, there is no sign of unstable soils in the immediate vicinity of the proposed WCF. e. Describe the purpose, type, and approximate quantities of any filling or grading proposed. Indicate source of fill. Only minor grading would be required to bring the area for the proposed equipment building to a flat condition for construction of the building's foundation. The monopole foundation will require drilling a 10-15 foot deep hole. Approximately 30 cubic yards of soil would be removed from the site. It would be disposed of in a lawful manner by construction personnel. f. Could erosion occur as a result of clearing, construction, or use? If so, generally describe. Minor erosion could occur due to grading activities associated with construction. However, construction will take place approximately 35-40 feet from the top of the slope of an adjoining hillside. g. About what percent of the site will be covered with impervious surfaces after project construction (for example, asphalt or buildings)? The 4.02 acre site is currently approximately 37.5 percent covered with impervious surfaces; following construction of the proposed WCF, the impervious area would be approximately 37.7 percent. h. Proposed measures to reduce or control erosion, or other impacts to the earth, if any: Best management practices, including covering stockpiles and placement of erosion control fencing will be employed, as shown on the submitted erosion control plan. C:\madeline\Madeline Chaney\t-mobile\t-mobile\2005 Q2 and 3\se4663 benson rd\se4663envchlst81105.doc 4 2. AIR a. What types of emissions to the air would result from the proposal (Le., dust, automobile, odors, industrial wood smoke) during construction and when the project is completed? If any, generally describe and give approximate quantities if known. There would be a slight increase in air emissions from construction vehicles at the site during construction. b. Are there any off-site sources of emission or odor that may affect your proposal? If so, generally describe. No. There are no off-site sources of emissions or odor that would affect this proposal. c. Proposed measures to reduce or control emissions or other impacts to air, if any: None proposed. 3. WATER a. Surface Water: 1) Is there any surface water body on or in the immediate vicinity of the site (including year-round and seasonal streams, saltwater, lakes, ponds, wetlands)? If yes, describe type and provide names. If appropriate, state what stream or river it flows into. There are no surface water bodies in the immediate vicinity. 2) Will the project require any work over, in, or adjacent to (within 200 feet) the described waters? If yes, please describe and attach available plans. No work will be required near surface waters. 3) Estimate the amount of fill and dredge material that would be placed in or removed from surface water or wetlands and indicate the area of the site that would be affected. Indicate the source of fill material. No fill or dredge material would be added or removed from surface waters. 4) Will the proposal require surface water withdrawals or diversions? Give general description, purpose, and approximate quantities if known. No surface water withdrawals or diversions would be required. 5) Does the proposal lie within a 1 DO-year flood plain? If so, note location on the site plan. The site is not within a 1 ~O-year flood plain C:\madeline\Madeline Chaney\t-mobile\t-mobile\2005 Q2 and 3\se4663 benson rd\se4663envchlst81105.doc 5 6) Does the proposal involve any discharges of waste materials to surface waters? If so, describe the type of waste and anticipated volume of discharge. The site would be uninhabited, therefore the proposal does not involve any discharges of waste materials to surface waters b. Ground Water: 1) Will ground water be withdrawn, or will water be discharged to ground water? Give general description, purpose, and approximate quantities if known. Ground water will not be withdrawn, nor will water be discharged to ground water for the proposed utility pole replacement. 2) Describe waste material that will be discharged into the ground from septic tanks or other sources, if any (for example: Domestic sewage; industrial, containing the following chemicals ... ; agricultural; etc.). Describe the general size of the system, the number of such systems, the number of houses to be served (if applicable), or the number of animals or humans the system(s) are expected to serve. The site is uninhabited. Therefore, no waste materials would be discharged from the site. c. Water Runoff (including storm water): 1) Describe the source of runoff (including storm water) and method of collection and disposal, if any (include quantities, if known). Where will this water flow? Will this water . flow irito other waters, If so, describe. Minor quantities of stormwater would cross the site surface from east to west by sheet flow during rain events. 2) Could waste material enter ground or surface waters? If so, generally describe. No. No waste is produced at the site. d. Proposed measures to reduce or control surface, ground, and runoff water impacts, if any: Best management practices, as shown on the submitted temporary erosion control plan, will be employed to reduce runoff impaGts. 4. PLANTS a. Check or circle types of vegetation found on the site: x...-deciduous tree: alder, ~aspen, other __ evergreen tree: fir, cedar, pine, other ~ _1-__ ~ ras __ pasture __ crop or grain __ wet soil plants: cattail, buttercup, bullrush, skunk cabbage, other __ water plants: water lily, eel grass, milfoil, other __ other types of vegetation C:\madeline\Madeline Chaney\t-mobile\t-mobile\2005 Q2 and 3\se4663 benson rd\se4663envchlst81105.doc 6 b. What kind and amount of vegetation will be removed or altered? Approximately 385 square feet of grass would be removed. c. List threatened or endangered species known to be on or near the site. None known. d. Proposed landscaping, use of native plants, or other measures to preserve or enhance vegetation on the site, if any: Foundation plantings would be placed around the proposed storage building as shown on submitted plans. 5. ANIMALS a. Circle any birds and animals which have been observed on or near the site or are known to be on or near the site: Birds: hawk, heron, eagle, songbirds, other ________ _ Mammals: deer, bear, elk, beaver, other -:----:-_______ _ Fish: bass, salmon, trout, herring, shellfish, other _____ _ No animals have been observed on this developed suburban site. However, one would anticipate finding common bird and mammal species in the area. b. List any threatened or endangered species known to be on or near the site. None known or observed. c. Is the site part of a migration route? If so, explain Not part of a migration route. d. Proposed measures to preserve or enhance wildlife, if any: None proposed. 6. ENERGY AND NATURAL RESOURCES a. What kinds of energy (electriC, natural gas, oil, wood stove, solar) will be used to meet the completed project's energy needs? Describe whether it will be used for heating, manufacturing, etc. Under normal operating conditions, the radio transmitters and receivers at the site use electricity from Puget Sound Energy. During periods when service is interrupted on the local power grid, backup batteries provide power to keep the site operational. No. The project would not affect the potential use of solar energy by adjacent properties. b. What kinds of energy conservation features are included in the plans of this proposal? List other proposed measures to reduce or control energy impacts, if any: Not applicable. C:\madeline\Madeline Chaney\t-mobile\t-mobile\2005 Q2 and 3\se4663 benson rd\se4663envchlst811 05.doc 7 7. ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH a. Are there any environmental health hazards, including exposure to toxic chemicals, risk of fire and explosion, spill, or hazardous waste, that could occur as a result of. this proposal? If so, describe. The site would rely on fully sealed lead acid batteries for backup power. According to the Material Safety Data Sheet for the batteries, there is no danger of these materials escaping to the environment under the operating conditions that will be present at this site. 1) Describe special emergency services that might be required. None. The site is self contained and uninhabited. During an emergency, the backup batteries would be employed to power the site. 2) Proposed measures to reduce or control environmental health hazards, if any: As noted above, the site is self contained and uninhabited. The backup batteries at the site are fully sealed and within a cabinet designed to contain any spillage. C:\madeline\Madeline Chaney\t-mobile\t-mobile\2005 Q2 and 3\se4663 benson rd\se4663envchlst81105.doc 8 b. Noise 1) What types of noise exist in the area which may affect your project (for example: traffic, equipment, operation, other)? None. The site is unmanned and would not be affected by traffic noise in the area. 2) What types and levels of noise would be created by or associated with the project on a short-term or a long-term basis (for example: traffic, construction, operation, other)? Indicate what hours noise would come from the site. A cooling fan on the proposed base transmitting system (BTS) equipment would be the sole source of sound emanating from the site on a daily basis. Any noise would be contained within the equipment building. 3) Proposed measures to reduce or control noise impacts, if any: Because the site does not include a generator, and complies with WAC 173-60, no measures for mitigating noise are proposed. 8. LAND AND SHORELINE USE a. What is the current use of the site and adjacent properties? The subject site is developed with an existing church building and associated parking area. Properties to the north, south and west are developed with single family and multifamily residences; the area immediately east is developed with an elementary and a middle school. b. Has the site been used for agriculture? If so, describe. The site has not been used for agriculture for at least 40 years. c. Describe any structures on the site. The site is developed with a 10,899 square foot church and a small (5' x 9') storage shed. d. Will any structures be demolished? If so, what? The existing storage shed will be removed and replaced with the proposed 383 square foot dual purpose storage building. e. What is the current zoning classification of the site? R-8, Residential, 8 units per acre. f. What is the current comprehensive plan deSignation of the site? Residential single family. g. If applicable, what is the current shoreline master program designation of the site? Not applicable C:\madeline\Madeline Chaney\t-mobile\t-mobile\2005 Q2 and 3\se4663 benson rd\se4663envchlst81105.doc 9 h. Has any part of the site been classified as an "environmentally sensitive" area? If so, specify. Yes. Portions of the westerly and northerly part of the church property have been classified as a moderate slide hazard. The proposed WCF would not be constructed in this area. i. Approximately how many people would reside or work in the completed project? None. Wireless technicians would visit the site on an occasional basis, approximately one or two times per month under normal operating conditions. j. Approximately how many people would the completed project displace? None k. Proposed measures to avoid or reduce displacement impacts, if any: Not applicable. I. Proposed measures to ensure the proposal is compatible with existing and projected land uses and plans, if any: The proposed development will occur in conformance with all applicable portions of the Renton Municipal Code, adopted Building Codes, and State and Federal regulations which are the implementing regulations for the City's Comprehensive Plan. 9. HOUSING a. Approximately how many units would be provided, if any? Indicate whether high, middle, or low-income housing. Not applicable to this proposal. b. Approximately how many units, if any, would be eliminated? Indicate whether high, middle, or low-income housing. Not applicable to this proposal. c. Proposed measures to reduce or control housing impacts, if any: None required for this proposal. 10. AESTHETICS a. What is the tallest height of any proposed structure(s), not including antennas; what is the principal exterior building material(s) proposed. The proposed structure would have an overall height of 59 feet 11 inches. b. What views in the immediate vicinity would be altered or obstructed? None. C:\madeline\Madeline Chaney\t-mobile\t-mobile\2005 Q2 and 3\se4663 benson rd\se4663envchlst811 05.doc 10 c. Proposed measures to reduce or control aesthetic impacts, if any: The proposed Monopole I will not be lighted, and will have an appearance similar to a light pole. Antennas would be placed inside a radome at the top of the pole for camouflaging them. The proposed equipment will be placed within a stick built utility shed, cables will be run underground and within the pole. 11. LIGHT AND GLARE h. What type of light or glare will the proposal produce? What time of day would it mainly occur? There is a remote possibility that obstruction lighting could be required at this site. If that is the case, the least intrusive lighting will be selected, within FAA guidelines. A shoebox style light will be added to the pole to act as a parking lot light. It will replace an existing light that has no shielding. i. Could light or glare from the finished project be a safety hazard or interfere with views? No. The site's location behind a screen of existing trees will preclude light or glare being a hazard or interfering with views. c. What existing off-site sources of light or glare may affect your proposal? None. d. Proposed measures to reduce or control light and glare impacts, if any: If FAA lighting is required, the least obtrusive allowable would be selected. 12. RECREATION a. What deSignated and informal recreational opportunities are in the immediate vicinity? Playground on adjacent school property. b. Would the proposed project displace any existing recreational uses? If so, describe. No. No existing recreational uses would be displaced. c. Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts on recreation, including recreation opportunities to be provided by the project or applicant, if any: None required. 13. HISTORIC AND CULTURAL PRESERVATION a. Are there any places or objects listed on, or proposed for, national state, or local preservation registers known to be on or next to the site? If so, generally describe. None known. C:\madeline\Madeline Chaney\t-mobile\t-mobile\2005 Q2 and 3\se4663 benson rd\se4663envchlst81105.doc 11 b. Generally describe any landmarks or evidence of historic, archaeological, scientific, or cultural importance known to be on or next to the site. None c. Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts, if any: None required. 14. TRANSPORTATION a. Identify public streets and highways serving the site, and describe proposed access to the existing street system. Show on site plans, if any. Access to the site i.s from Benson Road South, a major arterial. Access will not change with this proposal. b. Is site currently served by public transit? If not, what is the approximate distance to the nearest transit stop? There is a transit stop within the right of way of Benson Road, approximately % mile from the proposed WCF c. How many parking spaces would the completed project have? How many would the project eliminate? The existing parking lot would not be altered for this proposal. d. Will the proposal require any new roads or streets, or improvements to existing roads or streets, not including driveways? If so, generally describe (indicate whether public or private? No new roads will be required. e. Will the project use (or occur in the immediate vicinity of) water, rail, or air transportation? If so, generally describe. No. f. How many vehicular trips per day would be generated by the completed project? If known, indicate when peak volumes would occur. Approximately 1-2 trips per month will be generated under normal operating conditions. g. Proposed measures to reduce or control transportation impacts, if any: None required. C:\madeline\Madeline Chaney\t-mobile\t-mobile\2005 Q2 and 3\se4663 benson rd\se4663envchlst81105.doc 12 .. , 15. PUBLIC SERVICES a. Would the project result in an increased need for public services (for example: fire protection, police protection, health care, schools, other)? If so, generally describe. No. In fact, because land line phone service is commonly incapacitated by extreme weather or emergency events, public safety would be enhanced by the availability of wireless phone service. b. Proposed measures to reduce or control direct impacts on public services, if any. None required. 16. UTILITIES a. Circle utilities currently available at the site: ~ncltY, natural gas, water, refuse se~ <:::@ephone, sanitary sew~eptic system, other. b. Describe the utilities that are proposed for the project, the utility providing the service, and the general construction activities on the site or in the immediate vicinity which might be needed. Electricity and phone service connections will be taken from the existing service lines on the south side of the tract. This will require some shallow trenching for placement of underground service lines. C. SIGNATURE I, the undersigned, state that to the best of my knowledge the above information is true and complete. It is understood that the lead agency may withdraw any declaration of non-significance that it might issue in reliance upon this checklist should there be any willful misrepresentation or willful lack of full disclosure on my part. Proponent: 114JJ) ()) z?qy Name Printed: Madeline W. ChaneyAICP. ApplicantforVoicestream PCS III Corn .. DBA T-Mobile Date: August 25. 2005 C:\madeline\Madeline Chaney\t-mobile\t-mobile\200S 02 and 3\se4663 benson rd\se4663envchlst8110S.doc 13 · ( , August 24, 2005 Adapt Project No. W A05-l304 7 -GEO T -Mobile, USA 19807 North Creek Parkway North, Suite 101 Bothell, W A 98011 Attention: Mr. Michael Putt (SE4663F) Subject: Geotechnical Engineering Evaluation Benson Road / Church MP Tower Site 2640 Benson Road Renton, W A 98055 Dear Mr. Putt, DEVELOPMENT p&ING CITYOFAE~~ AUG 262005 RECEIVED LSI Adapt, Inc. 615 Eighth Avenue South Seattle, Washington 98104 Tel (206) 654-7045 Fax (206)654-7048 www.lsiadapt.com Pursuant to your request, LSI Adapt, Inc. (Adapt) is pleased to submit this report describing our recent geotechnical engineering evaluation for the above-referenced site. The purpose of this study was to interpret general surface and subsurface site conditions, from which we could evaluate the feasibility of the project and formulate design recommendations concerning tower and equipment building foundations, structural fill, and other considerations. Our scope of services consisted of a surface reconnaissance, a subsurface exploration, geotechnical analyses, and report preparation. Authorization to proceed was given by Mr. Michael Putt ofT-Mobile, USA (T-Mobile). This report has been prepared for the exclusive use ofT-Mobile and their agents, for specific application to this project in accordance with generally accepted geotechnical engineering practice. Use or reliance upon this report by a third party is at their own risk. Adapt does not make any representation or warranty, express or implied, to such other parties as to the accuracy or completeness of this report or the suitability of its use by such other parties for any purpose whatever, known or unknown, to Adapt. r • • • LSI Adapt, Inc. We appreciate the opportunity to be of service to you. If you have any questions, or if we can be of further assistance to you, please contact us at (206) 654-7045. Respectfully submitted, LSI Adapt, Inc. Maika E. Nicholson, E.I.T. Staff Geotechnical Engineer Senior Geotechnical Engineer K. V. Lew, P. Eng. Senior Geotechnical Engineer Senior Reviewer menlrbh Attachments: Figure 1 -Location Map T-Mobile, USA Figure 2 -Site & Exploration Plan Boring Log B-1 LSI Adapt Project No. WA05-13047-GEO August 24, 2005 Page 2 , . LSI Adapt, Inc. 615 Eighth Avenue South Seattle, Washington 98104 T-Mobile, USA Geotechnical Engineering Evaluation Benson Road / Church MP Tower Site SE4663F Renton, Washington WA05-13047-GEO August 2005 Tel (206) 654-7045 Fax (206) 654-7048 www.lsiadapt.com I • • • LSI Adapt, Inc. PROJECT DESCRIPTION The host parcel, occupied by the First Presbyterian Church, is located at 2640 Benson Road, in Renton, Washington, as shown on the Location/Topographic Map (Figure 1). Specifically, the proposed tower and equipment building lease areas are located just west of the church parking lot, about 20 and 30-feet north of the northeast corner of the church building, respectively. We understand that current development plans call for the construction of a monopole communication tower and associated equipment building or cabinet pad. The site can be accessed from the west, via. the existing asphalt driveway and parking lot for the church. The project site and surrounding area are shown on the attached Site & Exploration Plan (Figure 2). It should be emphasized that the conclusions and recommendations contained in this report are based on our understanding of the c~ently proposed utilization of the project site, as derived from written and verbal information supplied to us by T-Mobile. Consequently, if any changes are made to the project, we recommend that we review the changes and modify our recommendations, if appropriate, to reflect those changes. EXPLORATORY METHODS We explored surface and subsurface conditions at the project site during a site visit on August 23, 2005. Our surface exploration consisted of a visual site reconnaissance. Our subsurface exploration consisted of advancing one boring (designated B-1) to a maximum depth of about 26.5-feet below existing ground surface (bgs) within an accessible area near the proposed tower location. The procedures used for subsurface exploration during our site visit are presented in the subsequent sections of this report. The locations of the exploration advanced for this study are shown on the attached Figure 2. The specific location and depth of the exploration performed was selected in relation to the proposed site features, under the constraints of budget and site access. The boring location and other features shown on Figure 2 were obtained by hand taping from existing site features; as such, the exploration location shown should be considered accurate only to the degree implied by the measuring methods used. It should be realized that the exploration performed for this eval~tion reveal subsurface conditions only at a discrete location across the project site and that actual conditions in other areas could vary. Furthermore, the nature and extent of any such variations would not become evident until additional explorations are performed or until construction activities have commenced. If significant variations are observed at the time of construction, we may need to modify our conclusions and recommendations contained in this report to reflect the actual site conditions. Auger Boring Procedures The borings were advanced using a trailer-mounted, hollow-stem auger drill rig operated by an independent company working under subcontract to Adapt. A geotechnical representative of Adapt was on-site to observe each boring, obtain representative soil samples, and log the subsurface conditions. T-Mobile. USA LSI Adapt Project No. WA05-13047-GEO August 24. 2005 Page 4 I • • LSI Adapt, Inc. After each boring was completed, the borehole was backfilled with a mixture of soil cuttings and bentonite chips. During drilling, soil samples were obtained on 5-foot depth intervals using the Standard Penetration Test (SPT) procedure (ASTM: 0 1586). This test and sampling method consists of driving a standard 2.0-inch outside diameter (00) split-barrel sampler a distance of 18 inches into the soil with a 140-pound hammer, free-falling a distance of 30 inches. The number of blows required to drive the sampler through each of the three, 6-inch intervals is noted. The total number of blows struck during the [mal 12 inches of penetration is considered the Standard Penetration Resistance, or "blow count". If 50 or more blows are struck within one 6-inch interval, the driving is ceased and the blow count is recorded as 50 blows for the actual number of inches of penetration. The resulting Standard Penetration Resistance values provide a measure of the relative density of granular soils or the relative consistency of cohesive soils. The Boring Logs attached to this report describe the various types of soils encountered in each boring, based primarily on visual interpretations made in the field and supported by our subsequent laboratory examination and testing. The logs indicate the approximate depth of the contacts between different soil layers, although these contacts may be gradational or undulating. Where a change in soil type occurred between sampling intervals, we inferred the depth of contact. Our logs also graphically indicates the blow count, sample type, sample number, and approximate depth of each soil sample obtained from the boring, along with any laboratory tests performed on the soil samples. If any groundwater was encountered in the borehole, the approximate groundwater depth is depicted on the boring log. Groundwater depth estimates are typically based on the moisture content of soil samples, the wetted height on the drilling rods, and the water level measured in the borehole after the auger has been extracted. SITE CONDITIONS The following sections describe our observations, measurements, and interpretations concerning surface, soil, groundwater, and seismic conditions at the project site. Surface Conditions The proposed tower and equipment· building lease areas are located within a generally level, grass- covered area of the host parcel. It should be noted that the ground slopes downwards at a gradient on the order of 4H:IV (Horizontal:Vertical) about 20-feet to the west of the proposed tower. Subsurface Conditions USGS maps reviewed as a part of this study classifies the geology at the subject site as Ground Moraine Deposits, characterized by a mixture of silt, sand and gravel. Our on-site exploration generally confirmed the presence of these mapped, native, soil units at depth. Our boring revealed the near-surface soil conditions to consist of about 6-12 inches of grass, sod and topsoil mantling about 6-feet. of loose to medium dense, silty fine to coarse sand with some gravel (Fill), underlain at a depth of about 7.0-feet bgs by medium dense, silty sand with some gravel. Below a depth of about 12.0-feet bgs the boring encountered dense sand, grading to dense to very dense sand with some silt and gravel, which extended to T-Mobile, USA LSI Adapt Project No. WA05-13047-GEO August24,2005 Page 5 · . LSI Adapt, Inc. the full depth explored of about 26.5-feet bgs. Groundwater was not encountered within the exploration at the time of our site visit. Throughout the year, groundwater levels would likely fluctuate in response to changing precipitation patterns, off-site construction activities, and changes in site utilization. Seismic Conditions Based on our analysis of subsurface exploration logs and a review of published geologic maps, we interpret the on-site soil conditions to correspond to Site Class D, as defined by Table 1615.l.1 of the 2003 International Building Code. The soil profile type for this site classification is characterized by stiff soils with an average blowcount ranging between 15 and 50 blows within the upper 100 feet bgs. Current (2003) National Seismic Hazard Maps prepared by the U.S. Geological Survey indicate that peak bedrock site acceleration coefficients of about 0.32 and 0.62 are appropriate for earthquakes having a 10-percent and 2-percent probability of exceedance in 50 years (corresponding to return intervals of 475 and 2,475 years), respectively. For purposes of seismic site characterization, the observed soil conditions were extrapolated below the exploration termination depth, based on a review of geologic maps and our knowledge of regional geology. CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS Current development plans call for the construction of a monopole communication tower and associated equipment building or cabinet pad within the proposed lease area. Based on the anticipated subsurface conditions, we recommend that the proposed telecommunication tower be supported on a drilled pier foundation. General design criteria for compressive, uplift and lateral support of a drilled pier are presented below. Our specific recommendations concerning site preparation, equipment building or cabinet foundations, tower foundations, access driveway, and structural fill are presented in the subsequent sections. Site Preparation Preparation of the tower lease area for construction should involve clearing, grubbing, stripping, cutting, filling, dewatering, and subgrade preparation. The following comments and recommendations apply to site preparation. Temporary Drainage: We recommend intercepting and diverting any potential sources of surface or near-surface water within the construction zones before stripping begins. Because the selection of an appropriate drainage system will depend on the water quantity, season, weather conditions, construction sequence, and contractor's methods, final decisions regarding drainage systems are best made in the field at the time of construction. Nonetheless, we anticipate that curbs, berms, or ditches placed along the uphill side of the work areas will adequately intercept surface water runoff. Clearing and Stripping: After surface and near-surface water sources have been controlled, the construction areas should be cleared and stripped of all vegetation, sod, topsoil, and debris. Our exploration indicates that an average thickness of about 6 to 12-inches of grass, sod and topsoil will be encountered across the lease areas, but significant variations could exist. It should be realized that if the T-Mobile, USA LSI Adapt Project No. WA05-13047-GEO August24,2005 PageS , . • LSI Adapt, Inc. stripping operation proceeds during wet weather, a generally greater stripping depth might be necessary to remove disturbed, surficial, moisture-sensitive soils; therefore, stripping is best performed during a period of dry weather. Excavations: Site excavations ranging up to about 1.S-feet deep may be required to accommodate the proposed equipment pad footings. Based on our explorations, we anticipate that these excavations will encounter loose to medium dense, silty sand with some gravel. These surficial soils can likely be cut with conventional earth working equipment such as small dozers and trackhoes. Backfill materials, where required, should be placed and compacted according to the recommendations presented in the Structural Fill section of this report. Dewatering: Our subsurface explorations did not encounter groundwater seepage within the upper 1.5- feet; however, depending on the actual excavation depth and the time of year that construction proceeds, the proposed site excavations might encounter perched groundwater seepage. If groundwater is encountered, we anticipate that an internal system of ditches, sump holes, and pumps will be adequate to temporarily dewaterthe excavations. Subgrade Preparation: Exposed subgrades for shallow footings, mat foundations, slabs-on-grade, roadway sections and other structures should be compacted to a firm, unyielding state, if required to achieve adequate density and warranted by soil moisture conditions. Any localized zones of loose, granular soils observed within a subgrade area should be compacted to a density commensurate with the surrounding soils. In contrast, any uncontrolled fill material or organic, soft, or pumping soils observed within a subgrade should be overexcavated and replaced with a suitable structural fill material. It should also be noted that any previous fill material should be overexcavated and replaced with structural fill if found to contain a significant amount of organics or debris. Frozen Subgrades: If earthwork takes place during freezing conditions, we recommend that all exposed sub grades be allowed to thaw and be recompacted prior to placing subsequent lifts of structural fill. Equipment BuiIdingoT Cabinet Foundations It is our understanding that the support pad for the proposed equipment building or cabinets will consist of a poured-in-place, concrete slab-on-grade with thickened edges; we recommend that these thickened slab edges be designed as spread footings. Alternatively, the equipment support pad may be designed as a structural slab-on-grade with a uniform thickness and a reduced bearing pressure. In either case, we anticipate that the support pad bearing pressure will be relatively light. The following recommendations and comments are provided for purposes of equipment pad design and construction. Subgrade Conditions: The prepared bearing subgrade soils should consist of loose to medium dense, silty sand with some gravel. Exposed slab-on-grade, footing or overexcavation subgrades should be compacted to a firm, unyielding state, in accordance with the recommendations provided in the Site Preparation section of this report. T-Mobile, USA LSI Adapt Project No. WA05-13047-GEO August24,2005 Page 7 , . LSI Adapt, Inc. Subgrade Verification: Footings or slabs-on-grade should never be cast atop soft, loose, organic, or frozen soils; nor atop subgrades covered by standing water. A representative from Adapt should be retained to observe the condition of footing subgrades before concrete is poured to verify that they have been adequately prepared. Footing Dimensions: For a poured-in-place, concrete slab-on-grade with thickened-edge footings, we recommend that the spread footing elements be constructed to have a minimum width of 12-inches. For frost protection, the footings should penetrate at least 18-inches below the lowest adjacent exterior grades. Bearing Pressure and Lateral Resistance: A maximum allowable static soil bearing pressure of 1,500 pounds per-square-foot (pst) may be used for thickened-edge pad footings designed as described above. For the alternate equipment support pad design using a uniform thickness, structural slab-on-grade, we recommend a maximum allowable static soil bearing pressure of 500 psf across the pad area. These bearing pressure values can be increased by one-third to accommodate transient wind or seismic loads. An allowable base friction coefficient of 0.30 and an allowable passive earth pressure of 280 pounds per cubic foot (pct), expressed as an equivalent fluid unit weight, may be used for that portion of the foundation embedded more than I-foot below finished exterior subgrade elevation. These lateral resistance values incorporate a minimum safety factor of 1.5. Grading and Capping: Final site grades should slope downward away from the structure so that runoff water will flow by gravity to suitable collection points, rather than ponding near the structure. Ideally, the area surrounding the structure should be capped with concrete, asphalt, or compacted low-permeability (silty) soils to reduce surface-water infiltration into the subsoil adjacent tolbelow the foundation. Settlements: We estimate that total post-construction settlements of properly designed thickened-edge footings bearing on properly prepared subgrades could approach I-inch, with differential settlements approaching one-half of the total. For a structural slab-on-grade equipment pad with a uniform thickness (without thickened edges), somewhat greater movements may be experienced. Tower Drilled Pier Foundations The subsurface soil and groundwater conditions observed in our site exploration are considered to be generally suitable for the use of a drilled pier foundation to support the proposed tower. The following recommendations and comments are provided for purposes of drilled pier design and construction. End Bearing Capacities: We recommend that the drilled pier penetrate at least IS-feet below the ground surface. For vertical compressive soil bearing capacity, we recommend using the unit end bearing capacity presented in Table 1 below, where B is the diameter of the pier in feet and D is the depth into the bearing layer in feet. This allowable end bearing capacity includes a minimum safety factor of 1.5. T-Mobile. USA LSI Adapt Project No. WA05-13047-GEO August 24. 2005 Page 8 ___________________ tt ____________________ ta _____ L_S__A_d~a~pt~,_ln_c~. __ __ I Table 1 I Allowable End Bearing Capacity Depth (feet) Allowable Bearing Capacity (tsf) Limiting Point Resistance (tsf) 15-23 3.0 DIB 5 23-27 5.5 DIB 8 Frictional Capacities: For frictional resistance along the shaft of the drilled piers, acting both downward and in uplift, we recommend using the allowable skin friction value listed in Table 2. We recommend that frictional resistance be neglected in the uppermost 2-feet below the ground surface. The allowable skin friction values presented includes a minimum safety factor of 1.5. Table 2 Allowable Skin Friction Capacities Depth (feet) Allowable Skin Friction (tsf) 0-2 0.0 2-7 0.05 7-12 0.10 12-23 0.25 23-27 0.40 Lateral Capacities: Drilled pier foundations for communication monopole towers are typically rigid and act as a pole, which rotates around a fixed point at depth. Although more complex and detailed analyses are available, either the simplified passive earth pressure method or the subgrade reaction method is typically used to determine the pier diameter and depth required to resist ground line reaction forces and moments. These methods are described below. T-Mobile, USA • Passive Earth Pressure Method: The passive earth pressure method is a simplified approach that is generally used to estimate an allowable lateral load capacity based on soil wedge failure theory. Although the lateral deflection associated with the soil wedge failure may be estimated, design lateral deflections using the passive earth pressure method should· be considered approximate, due to the simplified nature of the method. According to the NA VF AC Design Manual 7.02 (1986), a lateral deflection equal to about 0.001 times the pier length would be required to mobilize the allowable passive pressure presented below; higher deflections would mobilize higher passive pressures. Our recommended passive earth pressures for the soil layers encountered at this site are presented in Table 3 and incorporate a safety factor of at least 1.5, which is commonly applied to transient or seismic loading conditions. It should be noted that these passive pressure values have been reduced by a factor of 0.95 (95 percent of typical values for level ground surface condition), to account for the nearby 4H: 1 V slope conditions on the LSI Adapt Project No. WA05-13047-GEO August24,2005 Page 9 ___________________ 4a ________________________ ~ ______ LS_I_A_d_a~p_t,~I~n_c" __ ___ west side of the proposed pole location. These values are expressed as an equivalent fluid unit weight to reflect the linear increase with depth and may be assumed to act over an area measuring two pier diameters wide by eight pier diameters deep: Table 3 Allowable Passive Pressures Depth (feet) Allowable Passive Pressure (pet) 0-2 0 2-8 250 8-12 290 12-23 340 23-27 380 • Subgrade Reaction Method: The subgrade reaction method is typically used to compute lateral design loads based on allowable lateral deflections. Using this method, the soil reaction pressure (p) on the face of the pier is related to the lateral displacement (y) of the pier by the horizontal subgrade modulus (lett); this relationship is expressed as p=ktty. Because soil modulus values are based on small scale, beam load test data, and are usually reported as a vertical subgrade modulus (kv), they must be converted to horizontal subgrade modulus values representative for larger scale applications (such as large pier diameters) by means of various scaling factors, as discussed below. In addition to the scaling and loading orientation, the soil-pier interaction governing lett is also affected by the soil type, as follows: • SAND and Soft CLAY: For cohesion less soils (sand, non-plastic silt) and soft cohesive soils (clay, cohesive silt), the horizontal subgrade modulus (lett) increases linearly with depth (z). This relationship is expressed as lett = nhz(llB), where nb is the coefficient of horizontal subgrade reaction and (lIB) is the scaling factor. • Stiff or Hard CLAY: For stiff or hard cohesive soils (clay, cohesive silts), the horizontal sub grade modulus (lett) is essentially the same as the vertical subgrade modulus (kv) and is considered constant with depth. This relationship is expressed as lett=kv[1(ft)/1.5B], where [1(ft)/1.5B] is the scaling factor (B is expressed in feet). Our recommended values for the coefficient of horizontal sub grade reaction (nh) and the vertical subgrade modulus (kv) for the soil layers encountered at this site are presented in Table 4 below. These values do not include a factor of safety since they model the relationship between contact pressure and displacement. Therefore, the structural T-Mobile, USA August 24, 2005 LSI Adapt Project No. WA05-13047-GEO Page 10 · . • LSI Adapt, Inc. engineer or monopole manufacturer should select an appropriate allowable displacement for design, based on the specific requirements of the communication equipment mounted on the tower. Table 4 Recommended Horizontal Subgrade Reaction Values Depth Interval nb kv (feet) (pci) (pci) 0-2 0 N/A 2-7 8 N/A 7-12 25 N/A 12-23 SO N/A 23-27 70 N/A Coefficient of Horizontal ~=nb(zIB) ~=kvI(l.5B) Subgrade Reaction (PCi) (Sand & Soft Clay) (Stiff Clay) Construction Considerations: Our explorations revealed the site soils to generally consist of loose to medium dense, silty sand with some gravel over dense to very dense sand with some silt and gravel. Groundwater seepage was not encountered within the exploration at the time of our site visit. However, dewatering may be required, depending on the actual depth and time of year of drilled pier construction. The foundation-drilling contractor should therefore be prepared to case,the excavation to prevent caving and raveling of the pier shaft sidewall, if necessary due to unexpected soil or excessive groundwater , seepage conditions. Should unanticipated heavy groundwater inflow be encountered in the drilled pier excavation, it may be necessary to pump out the accumulated groundwater prior to concrete placement, or to use a tremie tube to place the concrete from the bottom of the drilled pier excavation, thereby displacing the accumulated water during concrete placement. Alternatively, the use of bentonite slurry could be utilized to stabilize the drilled pier excavation. Drilled Pier Excavation Conditions: The drilling contractor should be prepared to clean out the bottom of the pier excavation if loose soil is observed or suspected, with or without the presence of slurry or groundwater. As a minimum, we recommend that the drilling contractor have a cleanout bucket on site to remove loose soils and/or mud from the bottom of the pier. If groundwater is present and abundant within the pier hole, we recommend that the foundation concrete be tremied from the bottom of the hole to displace the water and minimize the risk of contaminating the concrete mix. The Drilled Shaft Manual published by the Federal Highway Administration recommends that concrete be placed by tremie methods if more than 3 inches of water has accumulated in the excavation. Access Driveway Based on available site plans and our site reconnaissance visit, it does not appear necessary to construct a new access road. However, if extensions or improvements to the existing access road are required, we T-Mobile, USA LSI Adapt Project No. WA05-13047-GEO August24,2005 Page 11 LSI Adapt, Inc. recommend that the subgrade for any access roadway be prepared in accordance with the Site Preparation section of this report. For planning purposes, we anticipate that 6 to 12-inches of "clean" sand and gravel subbase material and a minimum 3-inches of crushed rock surfacing will be required to create a stable gravel roadway surface at this site. Adapt can provide additional sub grade stabilization or gravel road section recommendations based on observed field conditions at the time of construction. Where cuts and fills are required, they should be accomplished in accordance with the recommendations provided in the Site Preparation and Structural Fill sections of this report. Structural Fill The following comments, recommendations, and conclusions regarding structural fill are provided for design and construction purposes. Materials: Structural fill includes any fill materials placed under footings, pavements, driveways, and other such structures. Typical materials used for structural fill include: clean, well-graded sand and gravel (pit-run); clean sand; crushed rock; controlled-density fill (COF); lean-mix concrete; and various soil mixtures of silt, sand, and gravel. Recycled concrete, asphalt, and glass, derived from pulverized parent materials may also be used as structural fill. Placement and Compaction: Generally, COF, and lean-mix concrete do not require special placement and compaction procedures. In contrast, pit-run, sand, crushed rock, soil mixtures, and recycled materials should be placed in horizontal lifts not exceeding 8 inches in loose thickness, and each lift should be thoroughly compacted with a mechanical compactor. Using the modified Proctor maximum dry density (ASTM: 0-1557) as a standard, we recommend that structural fill used for various on-site applications be compacted to the following minimum densities: Fill Application SlablFooting subgrade Roadway subgrade (upper 1 foot) Roadway subgrade (below 1 foot) Minimum Compaction 90 percent 95 percent 90 percent Subgrades and Testing: Regardless of location or material, all structural fill should be placed over firm, unyielding subgrade soils. We recommend that a representative from Adapt be retained to observe the condition of subgrade soils before fill placement begins, and to perform a series of in-place density tests during soil fill placement. In this way, the adequacy of soil compaction efforts may be evaluated as earthwork progresses. Fines Content: Soils used for structural fill should not contain individual particles greater than about 6 inches in diameter and should be free of organics, debris, and other deleterious materials. Given these prerequisites, the suitability of soils used for structural fill depends primarily on the grain-size distribution and moisture content of the soils when they are placed. When the "fines" content (that soil fraction passing the U.S. No. 200 Sieve) increases, soils become more sensitive to small changes in moisture T -Mobile, USA LSI Adapt Project No. WA05-13047-GEO August 24, 2005 Page 12 . -. • • LSI Adapt, Inc. content. Soils containing more than about 5 percent fines (by weight) cannot be consistently compacted to a firm, unyielding condition when the moisture content is more than about 2 percentage points above optimum. The near-surface silty sand with some gravel should be considered moderately to highly moisture sensitive, whereas the deeper sand with some silt and gravel should exhibit relatively low moisture sensitivity. The use of "clean" soil is necessary for fill placement during wet-weather site work, or if the in-situ moisture content of the sandy site soils is too high to allow adequate compaction. Clean soils are defined as granular soils that have a fines content of less than 5 percent (by weight) based on the soil fraction passing the U.S. 314-inch Sieve. CLOSURE The conclusions and recommendations presented in this report are based, in part, on the explorations that we performed for this study. If variations in subsurface conditions are discovered during earthwork, we may need to modify this report. The future performance and integrity of the tower foundations will depend largely on proper initial site preparation, drainage, and construction procedures. Monitoring by experienced geotechnical personnel should be considered an integral part of the construction process. We are available to provide geotechnical inspection and testing services during the earthwork and foundation construction phases of the project. If variations in the subgrade conditions are observed at that time, we would be able to provide additional geotechnical engineering recommendations, thus minimizing delays as the project develops. We are also available to review preliminary plans and specifications before construction begins. T-Mobile, USA LSI Adapt Project No_ WA05-13047-GEO August24,2005 Page 13 Tukwila [ 'I .. ~ l = ~~~~~~'-~ -~- LSI AdIpI, /nt:. 615 -8th Avenue South Seatl/e, Washington 98104 Tel (206) 654-7045 Fax (206) 654-7048 FIGURE 1 -Location/Topographic MAP Project : Benson Road/Church MP Location : 2640 Benson Road ClIent : Date: Renton, WA 98055 T-Mobile 08/24/05 Project No: WA05-13047-GEO , -"" "-'" . '". ~ .. - LEGEND: -.... -.~. I I I / i I I 8-1 -$--BORING NUMBER AND APPROXIMATE LOCATION NOTES: o I I • I: I;:: I~ I ~ 100---___ ----;- ! i I " .......... -. 80 SCHOOL PROPERTY 160 DRAWING BASED ON 'SITE PLAN -A-1 • DRAWING PROVIDED BY VOICESTREAM (DATED 08111/05) APPROXIMA TE SCALE IN FEET LSI Adapt, Inc. 615 -8th Avenue South Seattfe, Washington 98104 Tel (206) 654-7045 Fax (206) 654-7048 FIGURE 2 Site and Exploration Plan Project : Benson Road/Church MP Location : 2640 Benson Road Renton, WA 98055 ClIent: T-Mobile Date: 08/24/05 Project No WA05-13047-GEO L "'., C' FRING LOG e Boring No.: LSI Adapt. Inc. Ptl 615 -8th Avenue South 8-1 . fM Seattle, Washington 98104 Project : Benson Rood/Church MP LocatIOn : 2640 Benson Rood Renton, WA 98055 Adapt~ Tel (206) 654-7045 ClIent : T-Mobile Fax (206) 654-7048 Date: 08/24/05 Project No : WA05-1J047-GEO Ground Surface Elevation: N/A Elevation Reference : NlA Page: 01 of 01 :I: ~ wO: 0: .... --,w ~!Z o.a SOIL DESCRIPTION o.w o.<D w LABORATORY TESTING w. ::Eo. !~ 95 0 .... 0:' ;a~ ~ <DO ii: 0 Grass, sod, topsoil I-----------------------------------Loose to medium dense, moist to wet, dark gray, I--silty fine to coarse SAND with some gravel (Fill) I--IT 5-1 2 Blowcount possibly overstated on 2 r--3 gravel I-5-IT 5-2 0 f-- 1 1 f-----------------------------------Medium dense, wet, tan with rusty stains, silty IT 5-3 1 r--fine to coarse SAND with some gravel 6 f-- 9 10 [ 54 12 Blowcount possibly overstated on 34 r--41 gravel I-----------------------------------Dense, moist-wet, tan-brown, fine to medium I--SAND I-- 1-15-IT I-5-5 5 f-- 15 18 - ------------------With some silt and gravel f-- 1-20 IT 5-6 6 21 I--24 I-- I-------------------Becoming very dense I-- 25-TT 5-7 9 ~ 31 43 r--Boring terminated @ -26.5 feet bgs No groundwater encountered f-- ~I--i .1-30 r LEGEND f I 2';nch o. D. Split-spoon Sample X Sample nOl Racovarad ~Typa 01 Analytical NR NoRecovary .no Testing Pertonned ATO At TIme of Drilling .. ][ ;!~:;~~:";T& Mo"", ...1. Static Water Laval ~ e 20ll Wash (% fines shown) I BIDWCount Shown) A TO at TIme of Drilling II Shelby Tube Sample -£ Static Water LOVlII RAdng ~ * Grain Size Analysis . ~ Grab Sample (Soil CuUings) -!-Perched GroundWatar z ~ XX (% fin .. shown) Start Date. 08123/05 Comoletlon Date. 08123/05 Loaaed Bv . MEN NON-IONIZING ELECTROMAGNETIC EXPOSURE ANALYSIS & ENGINEERING CERTIFICATION Global Wireless by ~ " "Mobile'/~ SITE NUMBER: SE4663F SITE NAME: Benson Road/Church MP SITE ADDRESS: 2640 Benson Road Renton, WA 98055 DATE: August, 2005 PREPARED BY: B. J. THOMAS, P.E. ,'\ ~ PROJECT The proposed VoiceStream Wireless project consists of a WCF (Wireless Communications Facility) located on a private parcel at 2640 Benson Road, Renton, WA 98055, King County Tax Parcel 2923059102. The planned improvements include antennas mounted within a shroud on a 59'-11" AGL 24" round steel pole with supporting BTS (Base Transmission System) radio equipment located in an equipment shelter near the base of the pole. EQUIPMENT Type of Service: Broadband PCS Antennas: Andrew ADFD182-6565B-R1DM (1 per sector) Sectors: 3 (alpha = 0°, beta = 190°, gamma = 240°) Frequencies: Send (1965 Mhz -1975 Mhz) Receive (1885 Mhz -1895 Mhz) Maximum Power: 432 w/channel ERP (58.5 dBm/channel EIRP) Maximum Channels: 4 per sector Antenna Rad Center: 51'-6"AGL (lowest beta sector for worst case) CALCULATIONS Calculations for RF power densities near ground level are based on the "Evaluating Compliance with FCC Guidelines for Human Exposure to Radio Frequency Electromagnetic Fields OET Bulletin 65" Edition 97-01, August 1997 issued by the Federal Communications Commission Office of Engineering & Technology. Section 2 of OET Bulletin 65 demonstrates that "for a truly worst-case prediction of power density at or near the surface, such as at ground-level or on a rooftop, 100% reflection of incoming radiation can be assumed, resulting in a potential doubling of predicted field strength and a four-fold increase in (far field equivalent) power density". Therefore the following equation is used: S = EIRP/rrR2 Where S = power density (mW/cm2), EIRP = equivalent isotropically radiated power and R = distance to the center of the radiation antenna (cm) I. ,. Attached as an exhibit are the MPE (Maximum Power Exposure) calculations using the above referenced formula and the antenna manufacturers product data information with dB loss data below main lobe as provided by the manufacturer. The calculations show that the maximum MPE at ground level (6' above AGL) occurs at a minor lobe angle of 38°, 58.2' from the base of the pole and the power density is 0.00872 W/cm2 with 4 channels operating at a total ERP of 1,736 watts. This is 0.872% of the MPE limit for the general population/uncontrolled exposure of 1.0 mW/cm2 as referenced in Table I OET Bulletin 65 Appendix A. ENVIRONMENTAL EVALUATION Routine environmental evaluation is required if the pes broadband facility is less than 10 m (32.81 feet) AGL and has a total power of all channels in any given sector greater than 2,OOOW ERP as referenced in "Table 2 Transmitters, Facilities and Operations subject to Routine environmental Evaluation" of Bulletin 65. As the proposed antennas lowest point above ground level is 15.02 m (49.25 feet), the WCF is categorically exempt from requirement for routine environmental processing. FCC COMPLIANCE The general population/uncontrolled exposure near the pole, including persons at ground level, surrounding properties, inside and on existing structures will have RF exposure much lower than the "worst case" scenario, which is a small fraction of the MPE limit. Only trained persons will be allowed to climb the pole for maintenance operations. VoiceStream and/or its contractors will provide training to make the employees fully aware of the potential for RF exposure occupational training and they can exercise control over their exposure that is within the occupational/controlled limits. CONCLUSIONS Based on calculations, the proposed WCF will comply with current FCC and county guidelines for human exposure to radiofrequency electromagnetic fields. All representations contained herein are true to the best of my knowledge. EXIHIBITS • MPE Calculations • Antenna Product Data Sheets • WCF Location Map ~~X~t!!;~ SrrI3:sX~a is\ ca ~ B. J. Thomas, P.E. . • Antenna used in analysis is ADFPI82-6565B-XDM 2d by Andrew Effective tower height assumes a person 6 ft tall. 4 TRX Maximum 51.5 SE4663F Benson Road/Church MP 2640 Benson Road Bothel, WA 98011 MPE Calculations main beam max power density in mW/ern (4TRX) tower height, y radiation center (feet), y 51.5 51.5 51.5 51.5 51.5 51.5 51.5 51.5 51.5 51.5 51.5 51.5 51.5 51.5 51.5 51.5 51.5 51.5 51.5 51.5 51.5 51.5 51.5 51.5 51.5 51.5 51.5 51.5 51.5 51.5 51.5 51.5 51.5 51.5 51.5 51.5 51.5 51.5 51.5 51.5 51.5 51.5 51.5 51.5 51.5 51.5 51.5 51.5 51.5 51.5 51.5 51.5 51.5 51.5 51.5 51.5 51.5 51.5 51.5 51.5 51.5 51.5 51.5 51.5 51.5 51.5 51.5 51.5 51.5 51.5 51.5 51.5 effective tower height (feet), y 45.5 45.5 45.5 45.5 45.5 45.5 45.5 45.5 45.5 45.5 45.5 45.5 45.5 45.5 45.5 45.5 45.5 45.5 45.5 45.5 45.5 45.5 45.5 45.5 45.5 45.5 45.5 45.5 45.5 45.5 45.5 45.5 45.5 45.5 45.5 45.5 45.5 45.5 45.5 45.5 45.5 45.5 45.5 45.5 45.5 45.5 45.5 45.5 45.5 45.5 45.5 45.5 45.5 45.5 45.5 45.5 45.5 45.5 45.5 45.5 45.5 45.5 45.5 45.5 45.5 45.5 45.5 45.5 45.5 45.5 45.5 45.5 minor lobe angle 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 rcenta e of standard hOliz. Dis\., x Note: 1 mW/ern2 is 100% of allowable standard dB below main lobe hOliz. dis\. x 0.5 2606.693 o 1302.950 o 868.192 0.4 650.660 1.3 520.067 2.7 432.904 5.1 370.568 8.1 323.749 12.9 287.276 20.6 258.043 23.1 234.077 17.9 214.061 15.9 197.082 16.1 182.491 18.1 169.606 22.5 158.677 32.5 148.824 27.3 140.035 21.8 132.142 19.5 125.010 19.1 118.532 20.1 112.616 22.7 107.191 27.4 102.195 38.5 97.575 30.9 93.289 27 89.299 26.4 85.573 28 82.084 34 78.606 31.7 75.725 23.4 72.815 19.2 70.084 16.4 67.457 14.4 64.981 13.4 62.625 13 60.381 13.1 58.237 13.6 56.188 14.6 54.225 16.3 52.342 18.5 50.533 21.1 48.793 24.9 47.117 28.1 45.500 28.4 43.939 26.2 42.429 24.4 40.968 24 39.553 24.5 38.179 25.4 36.845 26.9 35.548 30.7 34.287 32.8 33.058 34.3 31.859 32 30.690 28.4 29.548 26.5 28.432 25.3 27.339 24.4 26.269 24.7 25.221 25 24.193 25 23.183 26.3 22.192 27.4 21.217 27.6 20.258 28.8 19.314 29.6 18.383 30.2 17.466 31.5 16.561 31.2 15.667 31.9 14.784 hyptonuse length (feet) 2607.090 1303.744 889.383 652.269 522.054 435.288 373.351 326.931 290.657 262.024 238.458 218.843 202.266 188.077 175.799 165.072 155.624 147.241 139.756 133.033 126.964 121.461 116.448 111.666 107.662 103.793 100.222 96.917 93.851 91.000 88.343 85.862 83.542 81.367 79.327 77.409 75.605 73.904 72.300 70.785 69.354 67.999 66.716 65.500 64.347 63.252 62.213 61.226 60.288 59.396 58.548 57.740 56.972 56.241 55.545 54.683 54.253 53.653 53.062 52.539 52.023 51.532 51.066 50.623 50.204 49.606 49.429 49.073 48.737 48.420 48.122 47.842 hypotenuse length (km) 0.795 0.397 0.265 0.199 0.159 0.133 0.114 0.100 0.089 0.060 0.073 0.067 0.062 0.057 0.054 0.050 0.047 0.045 0.043 0.041 0.039 0.037 0.035 0.034 0.033 0.032 0.031 0.030 0.029 0.028 0.027 0.026 0.025 0.025 0.024 0.024 0.023 0.023 0.022 0.022 0.021 0.021 0.020 0.020 0.020 0.019 0.019 0.019 0.018 0.Q18 0.018 0.018 0.017 0.017 0.017 0.017 0.017 0.016 0.016 0.016 0.016 0.016 0.016 0.015 0.015 0.015 0.015 0.015 0.015 0.015 0.015 0.015 hypotenuse length (ern) 79464.113 39738.109 26498.799 19881.166 15912.204 13267.562 11379.728 9964.857 8865.310 7988.493 7268.211 6670.332 6165.074 5732.594 5358.338 5031.393 4743.414 4487.909 4259.753 4054.849 3669.877 3702.124 3549.348 3409.676 3281.543 3163.621 3054.778 2954.045 2860.587 2773.660 2692.694 2617.078 2548.347 2460.074 2417.882 2359.433 2304.429 2252.602 2203.711 2157.540 2113.895 2072.600 2033.495 1996.435 1961.288 1927.934 1896.264 1866.177 1837.581 1810.391 1784.530 1759.925 1736.512 1714.229 1693.019 1672.831 1653.617 1635.332 1617.934 1601.385 1585.649 1570.693 1556.487 1543.001 1530.209 1518.085 1506.606 1495.755 1485.507 1475.844 1468.751 1458.210 ERP ERP main lobe main lobe minor lobe minor lobe (waHs) (dBm) ERP (dBm) EIRP (dBm) 1726 1726 1726 1726 1726 1726 1726 1726 1726 1726 1726 1726 1726 1726 1726 1726 1726 1726 1726 1726 1726 1726 1726 1726 1726 1726 1726 1726 1726 1726 1726 1726 1726 1726 1726 1726 1726 1726 1726 1726 1726 1726 1726 1726 1726 1726 1726 1726 1726 1726 1726 1726 1726 1726 1726 1726 1726 1726 1726 1726 1726 1726 1726 1726 1726 1726 1726 1726 1726 1726 1726 1726 62.37 62.37 62.37 62.37 62.37 62.37 62.37 62.37 62.37 62.37 62.37 62.37 62.37 62.37 62.37 62.37 62.37 62.37 62.37 62.37 62.37 62.37 62.37 62.37 62.37 62.37 62.37 62.37 62.37 62.37 62.37 62.37 62.37 62.37 62.37 62.37 62.37 62.37 62.37 62.37 62.37 62.37 62.37 62.37 62.37 62.37 62.37 62.37 62.37 62.37 62.37 62.37 62.37 62.37 62.37 62.37 62.37 62.37 62.37 62.37 62.37 62.37 62.37 62.37 62.37 62.37 62.37 62.37 62.37 62.37 62.37 62.37 61.87 62.37 62.37 61.97 61.07 59.67 57.27 54.27 49.47 41.77 39.27 44.47 46.47 48.27 44.27 39.87 29.87 35.07 40.57 42.87 43.27 42.27 39.67 34.97 25.87 31.47 35.37 35.97 34.37 28.37 30.67 38.97 43.17 45.97 47.97 48.97 49.37 49.27 48.77 47.77 46.07 43.87 41.27 37.47 34.27 33.97 36.17 37.97 38.37 37.87 36.97 35.47 31.67 29.57 28.07 30.37 33.97 35.87 37.07 37.97 37.67 37.37 37.37 36.07 34.97 34.77 33.57 32.77 32.17 30.87 31.17 30.47 64.03 64.53 64.53 64.13 63.23 61.83 59.43 58.43 51.63 43.93 41.43 48.63 48.63 48.43 48.43 42.03 32.03 37.23 42.73 45.03 45.43 44.43 41.83 37.13 28.03 33.63 37.53 38.13 36.53 30.53 32.83 41.13 45.33 48.13 50.13 51.13 51.53 51.43 50.93 49.93 48.23 46.03 43.43 39.63 36.43 36.13 38.33 40.13 40.53 40.03 39.13 37.63 33.83 31.73 30.23 32.53 36.13 38.03 39.23 40.13 39.83 39.53 39.53 38.23 37.13 36.93 35.73 34.93 34.33 33.03 33.33 32.63 Volce5tream Wireless 1 minor lobe EIRP(mW) 2529535.57 2838185.59 2838185.59 2588456.03 2103978.05 1524195.91 877083.20 439582.90 145559.58 24719.56 13900.83 46029.98 72952.60 69669.19 43958.29 15960.29 1596.03 5284.95 18751.71 31844.97 34917.31 27735.81 15241.96 5164.65 635.39 2306.96 5662.92 6501.91 4498.22 1129.90 1918.85 12973.01 34122.50 65019.06 103048.29 129730.11 142246.24 139008.32 123891.29 98410.35 66533.56 40090.44 22031.33 9184.19 4395.83 4102.43 6806.33 10304.83 11299.02 10070.26 8185.42 5794.83 2415.69 1489.50 1054.49 1790.77 4102.43 6353.91 8376.06 10304.83 9617.03 8975.13 8975.13 6653.36 5164.65 4932.20 3741.46 3112.01 2710.45 2009.28 2152.98 1832.49 Power at point x at ground level mW/ernA2 1.28E-04 5.72E-04 1.29E-03 2.06E-03 2.65E-03 2.76E-03 2. 16E-03 1.41E-03 5.90E-04 1.23E-04 8. 38E-05 3.29E-04 6.11E-04 6.75E-04 4.87E-04 2.01E-04 2.26E-05 8.35E-05 3.29E-04 6.17E-04 7.42E-04 6.44E-04 3.85E-04 1.41E-04 1.88E-05 7.34E-05 1.93E-04 2.37E-04 1.75E-04 4.67E-05 8.42E-05 6.03E-04 1.68E-03 3.36E-03 5.61E-03 7.42E-03 8.53E-03 8.72E-03 8. 12E-03 6.73E-03 4.74E-03 2.97E-03 1.70E-03 7.33E-04 3.64E-04 3.51E-04 6.03E-04 9.42E-04 1.07E-03 9.78E-04 8. 18E-04 5.96E-04 2.55E-04 1.61E-04 1.17E-04 2.04E-04 4.78E-04 7.56E-04 I.02E-03 1.28E-03 1.22E-03 1.16E-03 1.18E-03 8.90E-04 7.02E-04 6.81E-04 5. 25E-04 4.43E-04 3.91E-04 2.94E-04 3. 19E-04 2.74E-04 :. 'P effective radiation tower center height minor lobe dB below horiz. dis!. hyptonuse (feet). y (feet), y angle main lobe x length (feet) 5t.5 45.5 73 31.9 13.911 47.579 51.5 45.5 74 32 13.047 47.334 51.5 45.5 75 32 12.192 47.105 51.5 45.5 76 31.9 11.344 46.893 51.5 45.5 77 31.6 10.505 46.697 51.5 45.5 78 32.2 9.671 46.516 51.5 45.5 79 32.2 8.844 46.352 51.5 45.5 80 32.5 8.023 46.202 51.5 45.5 81 32.6 7.206 46.067 51.5 45.5 82 31.3 6.395 45.947 51.5 45.5 63 32 5.567 45.842 51.5 45.5 84 32.5 4.782 45.751 51.5 45.5 85 32.6 3.981 45.674 51.5 45.5 86 33.6 3.182 45.611 51.5 45.5 87 35.4 2.385 45.562 51.5 45.5 88 33.3 1.569 45.528 51.5 45.5 69 33 0.794 45.507 51.5 45.5 90 35.7 0.000 45.500 SE4663F Benson Road/Church MP 2640 Benson Road Bothel. WA 98011 MPE Calculations ERP ERP hypotenuse hypotenuse main lobe main lobe length (km) length (em) (watts) 0.015 1450.207 1726 0.014 1442.729 1726 0.014 1435.762 1726 0.014 1429.298 1726 0.014 1423.320 1726 0.014 1417.823 1726 0.014 1412.797 1726 0.014 1408.234 1726 0.014 1404.127 1726 0.014 1400.469 1726 0.014 1397.255 1726 0.014 1394.479 1726 0.014 1392.138 1726 0.014 1390.227 1726 0.014 1388.743 1726 0.014 1387.685 1726 0.014 1387.051 1726 0.014 1388.840 1726 VolceStream Wireless 2 (dBm) 62.37 62.37 62.37 62.37 62.37 62.37 62.37 62.37 62.37 62.37 62.37 62.37 62.37 62.37 62.37 62.37 62.37 62.37 e Power at point x minor lobe minor lobe minor lobe at ground level ERP(dBm) EIRP(dBm) EIRP(mW) mW/cm"2 30.47 32.63 1632.49 2.77E.()4 30.37 32.53 1790.77 2.74E.()4 30.37 32.53 1790.77 2. 77E.()4 30.47 32.63 1632.49 2.86E.()4 30.77 32.93 1983.54 3.09E.()4 30.17 32.33 1710.18 2.71E.()4 30.17 32.33 1710.18 2.73E.()4 29.87 32.03 1598.03 2.56E.()4 29.77 31.93 1559.70 2.52E.()4 31.07 33.23 2103.98 3.41E.()4 30.37 32.53 1790.77 2.92E.()4 29.87 32.03 1598.03 2.61E.()4 29.77 31.93 1559.70 2.56E.()4 28.77 30.93 1238.91 2.04E.()4 26.97 29.13 818.54 1.35E.()4 29.07 31.23 1327.52 2. 19E.()4 29.37 31.53 1422.46 2.35E.()4 26.67 28.63 763.91 1.26E.()4 ;. ;, I #'5. ••••• ADFDP182-6565B-XDM ±45° Diversity, Quad Antenna ,~! .. ;). ,':P,rovidestwo/independelit (~l!ahpol antennasiundE3r,O!1e Irad~'lrn.eJor~~i~fco~binir:ui~. ,"~i. . .!Each ·aQtEmna.iS·ind~pe~dl3nt'y ~pable':OUi~ld ,adjustabl~ .el~ctricaldow~ ,tilt ' f." .:,:' /'.~, "'''I';::''~''',j' c{;·.~'·., .",,1" "~-:1<:,'I' .. ,,: .-~":"''''''~··\·~~"'":c,-~;.". '"". ~·'~f",,:,-!:".,;_:,:·~.~··1: .. ~:::~! .. ."p.'\." ~:r~:';' DECIBEL- Base Station Antennas ", • .\. IFuily compatible'with,,~ndrew iJiELEifil~if® ~emote antenna 'control system. J.: ';Adjust~ble eieCtrical'down~ilt -a~'\~6'7o. '.:,." .;.: ';-" .,.:.;,. "; .. ;." .~~ , ';": :<'~ ;"". , .. ; ELECTRICAL Frequency (MHz) : 1710 -1880 1850 -1990 1920 -2170 Polarization : ±45° ±45° ±45° Gain (dBd/dBi) : 15.2117.3 15.5/17.6 15.7/17.8 Azimuth BW (Oeg.): 67 65 63 Elevation BW (Oeg.): 7 6.5 6 Beam Tilt (Oeg.): 0-7 0-7 0-7 USLS* (dB): >17 >18 >18 Front-To-Back Ratio* (dB) : 30 30 30 Isolation (dB) : >30 >30 >30 VSWR: <1.5:1 <1.5:1 <1.5:1 PIM3 @ 2 x 20w (dBc) : -150 -150 -150 Max. Input Power (Watts) : 200 200 200 Impedance (Ohms) : 50 50 50 Lightning Protection: DC Ground DC Ground DC Ground MECHANICAL Weight: Dimensions (LxWxO) : Max. Wind Load (@ 100 mph): Max. Wind Speed: Hardware Material: Connector Type: Color: Standard Mounting Hardware : RET Ordering Information Field Installed: Factory Installed, ATM100 Series: Factory Installed, ATM200 Series: Andrew Corporation 2601 Telecom Parkway Richardson, Texas U.S.A 75082-3521 Tel: 214.631.0310 15.6 kg (34.5Ib) 1,371 x 304 x 88 mm (54 x 12 x 3.5 in) 725.0 N (163 Ibf) 201 kmlh (125 mph) Galvanized Steel 7-16 DIN -Female (4, Bottom) Off White 600899A-2 AOFOP182-6565B-XOM AOFOP182-65B-R10M AOFOP182-65B-R20M Fax: 214.631.4706 Toll Free Tel: 1.800.676.5342 Fax: 1.800.229.4706 www.andrew.com Hi () m ~ Information correct at date of issue but may be subject to change without notice. -t " Urlrl~ ~ * -Indicates Typical 3/25/2005 dbtech@andrew.com SE4663F Benson Road ·S-2'''-;.J-S-t' , , J -,~ru-; , Thomas Teasdale Park "\ ____ -1 Lf~~n s=?:7-tR-SP ~Ch iJP \j /;0 /J \;; r~ U\\ ~ ~ ~\ <t?:, \)~ /' ~cP ~ ~~,?,.~~ - .( /..?l~\'f\--Gt { ~5) ~ . U), ~ f O/}l,sv7-' y ~~ ~~0L rJs=32nff'==> II Copyright © 1988-2001 Microsoft Corp. and/or its suppliers. All rights reserved. http://www.microsoft.comlstreets \ \ 1£/ L . I L-..-/$ '-----:----J c~ ige~ ~1>'W.o, --, V\'L \ c:::::: ISE4663~ Benso""n""Ro=ad".. ___ _ 2640 Benson Rd 5 Renton, WA 980~§ _____ _ Jr~~ffi~l ~:C=t ===========11 . .II I , ~ [I c: Q,) _~E::;-l66tf.i-St " I;l-~ "" , , ~ ; ~ ~-SE--:168tn=st ~ ~ ! ~ io+ ~ i i i i i o yds 100 200 300 400 500 © Copyright 2000 by Geographic Data Technology. Inc, All rights reserved. © 2000 Navigation Technologies. All rights reserved. This data includes information taken with permission from Canadian authorities © Her Majesty the Queen in Right of Canada. © Copyright 2000 by Compusearch Micromarketing Data and Systems Ltd. .~ e e to'· 'J 1 ·T· .. Mobile·® US;e 19807 North Creek Parkway North Bothell, WA98012 Radio Frequency Engineer Site Analysis T-Mobile Project No.: SE4663F Project Name: Benson Road IChurch Monopole Project Description: construction of a 59' 11" taillight pole style wireless communication facility with 3 antennas inside the new pole Location: 2640 Benson Road South, Renton W A Date: August 15, 2005 T -Mobile Site Selection Overview Wireless systems are expanded or introduced in a given area to improve service to customers. There are typically three reasons to add a new facility: extending coverage to new areas, increasing the capacity of the system within the current service area, or improving quality. Some sites do all three. Coverage: Coverage can be defined as having a certain level of signal strength in a particular area. T-Mobile's target is to provide -76dBm of signal strength to our customers in all areas. This level of coverage guarantees reliable signal strength inside buildings to provide excellent voice quality in residential neighborhoods and commercial areas. In today's competitive marketplace, T -Mobile requires adequate coverage to be competitive and to fulfill our responsibilities under our FCC license. Existing and proposed coverage is demonstrated by use of propagation maps and drive test data. The propagation maps are computer simulations showing wireless signal coverage in a given area. One map shows the predicted coverage as it exists without the proposed facility. The second map shows the proposed facility in the context of the surrounding sites. Propagation maps showing RF coverage in the subject service area with and without the proposed antennas are included as Attachments lA and lB. Capacity: Capacity is the number of calls that can be handled by a particular antenna site. When we make phone calls, our mobile phones communicate with a nearby antenna site that then connects to land based phone lines. Ongoing phone calls occupy the resources of the serving site, which can handle only a limited number of calls. When a particular antenna site is handling a sufficient number of calls the available radio frequency (RF) channels assigned to that site are used up. When this occurs, the wireless phone user will hear a busy signal on his or her phone. For T-Mobile's specific GSM technology, typical sites with 3 antennas can handle approximately 150 calls at any given time. The maximum capacity of each antenna is equivalent to approximately 50 people calling continuously over an hour. The Engineering term for this measurement of capacity is 50 Erlangs. The call traffic of antenna sites is continuously monitored and analyzed so that overloading of sites is prevented. Careful projection allows sufficient lead time to design, permit, and construct the wireless facility prior to exceeding the capacity of surrounding , ' I l 19807 North Creek Parkway North Bothell, WA98012 sites. Capacity cell sites are typically required in areas that currently have sufficient coverage. The objective for a capacity site is to handle increased call volume rather than increase the size of a coverage area. Interference: In areas with good coverage, phone calls may still have poor quality which translates into warbled audio or temporary loss of communication. This is often caused by interference. Wireless telephone systems reuse specific radio frequencies at different cell antenna locations. When frequencies are reused at nearby sites, interference may result. Engineers work to achieve the most efficient use of limited frequency resources and reduce interference. Unfortunately, there are still areas where interference is nearly unavoidable. This typically occurs in areas where one antenna site is having trouble handing off calls to another. On a freeway or busy roadway, for example, the network juggles a call between competing antenna sites, seeking to find the best one. When this occurs, the solution is often to locate a new antenna site as close to the location where the bad handoff is occurring. Interference is documented by measuring received call quality (Rx Qual) during a drive test similar to that performed to measure coverage. Rx Qual is a measurement of the bit errors on the radio link as the result of interference between adjacent cell sites using the same radio frequencies. Site Selection Process for this Location For this project, a coverage hole was shown to exist along Benson Road South between South 2'ft Street and South 17th Street (or Eagle Ridge Drive) on the north. The coverage hole is bordered generally by SR515 on the west and the multifamily residential developments east of Benson Road near Puget Drive to the east. This determination was made based on the following data: Prelimary design analysis/propagation -Attachments lA and IB. Data regarding the terrain within the service area is entered into a computer modeling program along with a series of variables, such as proposed antenna height, available radio frequencies and wireless equipment characteristics. From this information, T-Mobile's RF Engineers determined an area for the optimum location and height of the Wireless Communication Facility (WCF) antenna to maximize the coverage objective. The specific location and design of the proposed site has been selected to maximize coverage while conforming with the antenna height requirement of the City of Renton. The required antenna height is the minimum acceptable to provide the needed coverage with respect to coverage provided by neighboring cell sites. Lower antenna height will result in reduced effectiveness, including possible invalidation of the candidate. In some cases, an increased antenna height is possible which can allow some greater flexibility in location placement. However, too much antenna height is unacceptable as it creates interference conditions that degrade performance of one or more other existing cell sites in the T -Mobile network. RF Documentation for SE4663, Benson Road Church Monopole Page 2 of7 · .. 19807 North Creek Parkway North BotlleIl, W A 98012 When this technical analysis was completed, a search area map and other requirements were provided to T-Mobile's real estate and zoning specialists. With this information in hand, T- Mobile ranked potential sites. Whenever feasible, T -Mobile strives to acquire property that is properly zoned and adjacent to compatible land uses. T -Mobile attempts to select a location that minimizes or limits any negative visual impacts on adjacent or nearby residential areas to the greatest extent possible. Sites adjacent to existing tall power lines, antenna facilities, water treatment facilities, and on the tops of buildings are selected when they meet the other technical requirements of the system. To the maximum extent possible, new freestanding towers are avoided, as are locations adjacent to schools, preschools and view corridors or where demolition is required that would be detrimental to the existing character of the neighborhood. Rooftop and utility pole applications are favored where the design can be screened or incorporated into the existing structure and mechanical equipment can be placed out of view. Sites where zoning ordinances prohibit the location, insufficient room for mechanical equipment is available, required setbacks cannot be achieved or landowners are not interested in leasing property are eliminated from consideration. The subject area is dominated by residential development and school facilities. In addition, T -Mobile reviewed numerous electric transmission line locations, but these were all deemed unacceptable by Seattle City Light and Puget Sound Energy due to the line voltages, insufficient structural strength, and other design factors. Predicted Coverage for this Location Propagation Studies Two coverage plots, known as "propagation maps" and labeled Attachment lA and Attachment IB are submitted with this analysis. Attachment lA demonstrates the predicted level of existing service. Attachment IB demonstrates the service that will be provided by the new location at a height of approximately 51 feet (antenna center line). A lower height will not provide coverage or operate effectively because of the height of the existing vegetation and undulating nature of the terrain. The colors on the map indicate the different levels of coverage. The legend of the prediction plot shows several different classes of "best servers". The various colors of the plot indicate where a T-Mobile handset can be reliably used to make and receive telephone calls in the presence of varying received signal strength. The terrain, foliage, nearby structures, and WCF location are taken into account. The further away the mobile user is from the WCF and with additional! abundant local clutter (trees, buildings, etc.) between the WCF and the mobile user, the weaker the received signal strength will be. The following is a short explanation of each server class! color: Green: Indoor coverage represented by receive signals equal to or greater than -76dBm Yellow: In-Vehicle and outdoor coverage represented by receive signals greater than or equal to -84 dBm. Gray/white: No coverage or unreliable coverage The various parameters of the RF prediction model include terrain and clutter and are modified to more accurately reflect the actual terrain and topography of the specific location on the radio coverage predictions. RF Docwnentation for SE4663, Benson Road Church Monopole Page 30f7 .' . ·T· .. Mobile.®US. 19807 North Creek Parkway North BothelL WA98012 Other factors, not represented on the plot, include the ability of the site to handle the required call capacity or volume of calls and to provide the extent of data and other services required by T- Mobile customers. This site has been designed to provide coverage consistent with these factors. Finally, T-Mobile RF Engineers have determined that this height and location is necessary for the effective functioning of the minor communication utility. Enhanced 911 <E911) Requirements In addition to providing improved service to T -Mobile customers, the proposed antenna location is needed to meet Federal Communications Commission (FCC) requirements for Enhanced 911 (E911) service. The wireless E911 program is divided into two phases. Phase I requires wireless carriers, upon request from a local Public Safety Answering Point (pSAP), to report the telephone number of a wireless 911 caller and the location of the antenna that received the call. Phase n of the E911 program requires wireless carriers to provide far more precise location information, within 50 to 100 meters in most cases. The FCC established a four-year schedule for Phase II. It began on October 1, 2001 and is to be completed by December 31, 2005. Provision of E911 service in accordance with FCC requirements is a major component of the demand for additional cell sites. In addition to providing greater signal strength for in-building coverage that will provide better service to residential customers in the area, the proposed WCF will provide more precise triangulation for providing E911 service as required by the FCC. This will allow a person who is using E911 because of an emergency to be found more quickly because their location will be more easily determined as this and other antenna sites are added to the wireless network. Conclusion T -Mobile Engineers have carefully designed this site to maximize quality of service to our customers, which can best be accomplished at a height of approximately 51 feet (antenna centerline). This location was also selected because of its position relative to existing sites, providing favorable site geometry for federally mandated E911 location accuracy requirements and efficient frequency reuse. Good site geometry is needed to achieve accurate location of mobile users through triangulation with existing and proposed sites. RF Documentation for SE4663, Benson Road Church Monopole Page4of7 .' . 19807 North Creek Parkway North Bothell, W A980 12 RELATED INFORMATION About T -Mobile's Wireless Network T -Mobile operates the largest all digital, nationwide wireless network, based on the globally dominant GSM (Global System for Mobile Communications) technology. T-Mobile's entire network has been enhanced to provide customers wireless Internet access and operates the largest carrier owned "Wi-Fi" wireless broadband network in the world with service in over 5,100 public locations under the name T -Mobile HotSpofm. Overview of Wireless Technology Wireless service operates through cellular radio telephone networks, which are comprised of thousands of cell antenna sites, switching facilities, and other network elements. All cell antenna sites are radio frequency (RF) transmitters operating at different frequencies. Each wireless carrier is assigned a very limited amount of frequency, which is divided into a certain number of RF channels. RF Channels are assigned to each of the cell sites for communication with our handheld wireless phones. Since the number of channels is very limited, they have to be reused at different cell sites. The problem with reusing RF channels is the potential for interference. When a cell site is using the same RF channel as another cell site nearby, this can cause iDterference. Sometimes when you use a cell phone you may hear a metallic sound or wobbling. This is probably caused by interference. In order to minimize the interference from one site to another site that is using the same RF channel, all cell sites transmit at very low power level. The output of the wireless antenna sites is typically about 20 Watts. The RF emissions from a wireless antenna site are very minimal compared to the output power of other RF equipment. For example, a TV antenna towers' power output is in excess of 1000 Watts. Due to the low-level power output of wireless antennas, each cell site covers only a very limited area. In order to provide consistent, homogenous, quality wireless service, cell antenna sites are normally less than one mile apart. The exact distance required between cell antenna sites is determined by terrain, blockage from structures, call volume and antenna height. How does a wireless antenna work and what is its function? Wireless antennas send and receive radio signals. The RF carries the phone call to or from a wireless base station antenna that then connects your phone with the phone you are calling or with the phone calling you. Engineers carefully design each antenna to make sure it sends signals in precisely the right direction and at the right power level to provide the best calling quality to its coverage zone or "cell area." It is important to note the difference between antennas, towers and base stations. Antennas transmit the RF and are attached to structures such as buildings or towers. The antennas, towers and all of the related equipment make up a cell site. Cells, or coverage areas, come in all sizes -they may be as small as a single building (like an airport or an arena), as large as a rural area of 20 miles across, or any size in between -and each cell has its own base station. RF Docwnentation for SE4663, Benson Road Church Monopole Page 5 of7 · .. ·T· .. Mobile.® US~ 19807 North Creek Parkway North Bothell, WA98012 When you place a wireless call, your phone uses low-power radio signals to send your voice to an antenna at a base station. The base station sends your call to a switching center where it is connected to the landline phone network and delivered to the phone you called. If you are calling another wireless phone nearby, the switch might just connect you directly to another base station in the cell where the other phone is located. When you approach the boundary of one cell while using your wireless phone, the wireless network senses that the signal is becoming weak and automatically "hands off" the call to a base station in the next cell and your call continues uninterrupted. An antenna distributes radio waves throughout its cell much like a lamp distributes light throughout a room. A light bulb can provide light evenly throughout a room if it's located in the right place. In the same way, a properly located antenna can provide high-quality calling throughout its cell. That's why they're usually found above the ground on towers, poles, and buildings. Apart from improving service to T-Mobile's existing customer base, T-Mobile has experienced phenomenal growth in the last few years, with an average national customer growth rate of almost 40% per year. It is not unusual for T-Mobile to add more than a million nationwide customers per fiscal quarter. T-Mobile forecasts this phenomenal growth to continue, and T-Mobile's system design accounts for this predicted growth. I hope this information is useful to the City's permitting authorities. If there are any questions regarding the RF data provided in this report, please call. I may be reached at (425) 2467635. ~/{~ Adrian Moraru RF Engineer T -Mobile USA, Inc. RF Documentation for 8E4663, Benson Road Church Monopole Page 6 of7 ..... " l' ... ·T ... Mobile.'jy us. 19807 North Creek Parkway North Bothell, WA98012 Attachments IA and IB ATTACHMENTS Coverage Plots Showing Existing and Proposed RF Coverage in the Subject Area RF Documentation for SE4663, Benson Road Church Monopole Page 7 of7 • Indoor Coverage o Outdoor coverage o No coverage ATTACHMT lA fl· , .. ATTACHMT 18 Map Output • Page 1 of 1 ® King County Hom~ News Services Comments Pro sed T -Mobile Site SE4663 \\\. ..-;;~~=m~\-:::~~:~~~':·· '\-_." .• ·.r ,,". .. f " \\~,\ \ \ c.,o,J:tJAIN/\II'1 \ \ 92931i!JOO!P.'l \ \ I \ 1 I I. ~ __ J s;p~ ~Gtf:AJ E1J:1!1ffU11t-y 'I" fPfj Nf'-St.1V f!.1;,tt;)Lt SCM.'tJL Z923!J5!1fJ61 J 1 King County I GIS Center I Mami I ~ I Comments I SIHmib. By visiting this and other King County web pages, you expressly agree to be bound by tenns and CO~ 1 :2400 DEVELOpMENT PLANNING CITY ~F RENTON AUG 26 20G5 RECEIVED http://www5.metrokc.gov/servlet/com.esri.esrimap.Esrimap?ServiceName=overview&Clie... 7/27/2005 • - o m ... (")~ !!I'" ~~ C") -Os: ~ en ~ "TIm fR~ ~"l) oS: ZZ Z ~ • TEASDALEAK SE4663~ 2640 BENSON RD RENTON, WA 98055 EXISTING PHOTO #1 19807 North Creek Parkway North Bothell, Washington 98011 PHONE: 425-398-7569 FAX: 425-39a·75SO • TEASDALE&K SE4663~ 2640 BENSON RD RENTON, WA 98055 PROPOSED PHOTO #1 LOOKING SW FROM CHURCH PA,RKING LOT 19807 North Creek Parkway North Bothell, Washington 98011 PHONE: 425-l98-1569 FAX: 425-39a·75SO TEASDALEAK SE4663~ 2640 BENSON RD RENTON, WA 98055 EXISTING PHOTO #2 19807 North Creek Parkway North BotheU. Washington 98011 PHONE: 42S-l98-7589 FAA: 425-398-7550 TEASDALE.K SE4667' 2640 BENSON RD RENTON. WA 98055 PROPOSED PHOTO #2 19807 NOfth Creek Parkway North BatheD, Washington 98011 PHONE: 42s..~7589 FAX: 42S-39E1·75SO f , PACIFIC NORTHWEST TITLE COMPANY OF WASHINGTON, INC. 215 Columbia Street Seattle, washington 98104-1511 Senior Title Officer, Mike Sharkey (mikesbarkey@pnwt.com) Title Officer, CUrtis Goodman (curtisgoodman@pnwt.com) Assistant Title Officer, Charlie Bell (charliebell@pnwt.com) Unit No. 12 FAX No. (206)343-1330 Telephone Number (206)343-1327 T-Mobile 19807 North Bothell, WA Attention: Creek Parkway North, #101 98011 Title Order No. : 598448 Teresa Vanselow Your Ref.: SE 4663 F Teasdale Park A. L. T. A. COMMITMENT SCHEDULE A Effective Date: July 8, 2005, at 8:00 a.m. 1. Policy(ies) to be issued: A.ALTA Owner's Policy Standard (X) Extended ( ) Proposed Insured: TO FOLLOW Amount Premium Tax (8.B%) TO BE AGREED UPON NOTE: IF EXTENDED COVERAGE FOR OWNERS OR LENDERS WILL BE REQUIRED FOR A PENDING TRANSACTION, PLEASE NOTIFY US AT LEAST ONE WEEK PRIOR TO CLOSING SO THAT WE MAY INSPECT THE PREMISES. B. WORK CHARGES Amount Tax (8.8%) $ $ 350.00 30.80 2. The Estate or interest in the land described herein and which is covered by this commitment is fee simple. 3. The estate or interest referred to herein is at Date of Commitment vested in: FIRST PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH OF RENTON, WASHINGTON, a Washington corporation (NOTE: SEE SPECIAL EXCEPTION NUMBER 9 REGARDING EXECUTION OF THE FORTHCOMING DOCUMENT (S) TO BE INSURED) . 4. The land referred to in this commitment is situated in the State of washington, and described as follows: As on Schedule A, page 2, attached. T A.L.T.A. COMMITMENT SCHEDULE A Page 2 Order No. 598448 The land referred to in this commitment is situated in the State of Washington, and described as follows: That portion of the northeast quarter of the northwest quarter of Section 29, Township 23 North, Range 5 East, W.M., in King County, Washington, described as follows: Beginning at the southwest corner of said northeast quarter of the northwest quarter; Thence north 88°12'38" east along the south line of said northeast quarter of the northwest quarter 87.77 feet to the TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING; Thence continuing north 88°12'38" east 250.00 feet; Thence north 1°42'40" east 749.65 feet; Thence north 88°17'20" west 191.67 feet to the easterly line of the Benson Road (State Road No. 5C); Thence southerly along said easterly line on a curve to the right with a radius of 1462.69 feet a distance of 487.42 feet; Thence continuing along said easterly line on a curve to left with a radius of 447.68 feet, a distance of 285.95 feet to the TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING; EXCEPT the south 30 feet thereof conveyed to King County by Deed recorded under Recording Number 5098735. END OF SCHEDULE A NOTE FOR INFORMATIONAL PURPOSES ONLY: The following may be used as an abbreviated legal description on the documents to be recorded, per amended RCW 65.04. Said abbreviated legal description is not a substitute for a complete legal description within the body of the document. Ptn. NE NW 29-23-05 PACIFIC NORTHWEST TITLE COMPANY OF WASHINGTON, INC. A.L.T.A COMMITMENT Schedule B Order No. 598448 I. The following are the requirements to be complied with: A. Instruments necessary to create the estate or interest to be insured must be properly executed, delivered and duly filed for record. B. payment to or for the account of the grantors or mortgagors of the full consideration for the estate or interest to be insured. II. Schedule B of the Policy or Policies to be issued (as set forth in Schedule A) will contain exceptions to the following matters unless the same are disposed of to the satisfaction of the Company: A. Defects, liens, encumbrances, adverse claims or other matters, if any created, first appearing in the public records or attaching subsequent to the effective date hereof but prior to the date the proposed Insured acquires for value of record the estate or interest or mortgage thereon covered by this Commitment. B. GENERAL EXCEPTIONS: 1. Rights or claims of parties in possession not shown by the public records. 2. Public or private easements, or claims of easements, not shown by the public record. 3. Encroachments, overlaps, boundary line disputes, or other matters which would be disclosed by an accurate surveyor inspection of the premises. 4. Any lien, or right to a lien, for services, labor or material heretofore or hereafter furnished, imposed by law and not shown by the public records, or Liens under the Workmen's compensation Act not shown by the public records. 5. Any title or rights asserted by anyone including but not limited to persons, corporations, governments or other entities, to tide lands, or lands comprising the shores or bottoms of navigable rivers, lakes, bays, ocean or sound, or lands beyond the line of the harbor lines as established or changed by the United States Government. 6. (a) unpatented mining claims; (b) reservations or exceptions in patents or in Acts authorizing the issuance thereof; (c) water rights, claims or title to water. 7. Any service, installation, connection, maintenance, capacity, or construction charges for sewer, water, electricity or garbage removal. 8. General taxes not now payable or matters relating to special assessments and special levies, if any, preceding the same becoming a lien. 9. Indian tribal codes or regulations, Indian treaty or aboriginal rights, including, but not limited to, easements or equitable servitudes. C. SPECIAL EXCEPTIONS: As on Schedule B, attached. SPECIAL EXCEPTIONS: A.L.T.A. COMMITMENT SCHEDULE B Page 2 NOTE FOR INFORMATION PURPOSES ONLY: Order No. 598448 EFFECTIVE JANUARY 1, 1997, AND PURSUANT TO AMENDMENT OF WASHINGTON STATE STATUTES RELATING TO STANDARDIZATION OF RECORDED DOCUMENTS, THE FOLLOWING FORMAT AND CONTENT REQUIREMENTS MUST BE MET. FAILURE TO COMPLY MAY RESULT IN REJECTION OF THE DOCUMENT BY THE RECORDER. FORMAT: MARGINS TO BE 3" ON TOP OF FIRST PAGE, 1" ON SIDES AND BOTTOM -1" ON TOP, SIDES AND BOTTOM OF EACH SUCCEEDING PAGE. RETURN ADDRESS IS ONLY ITEM ALLOWED WITHIN SAID 3" MARGIN. NOTHING WITHIN 1" MARGINS. FONT SIZE OF 8 POINTS OR LARGER AND PAPER SIZE OF NO MORE THAN 81/2" BY 14". NO ATTACHMENTS ON PAGES SUCH AS STAPLED OR TAPED NOTARY SEALS; PRESSURE SEALS MUST BE SMUDGED. INFORMATION WHICH MUST APPEAR ON THE FIRST PAGE: RETURN ADDRESS, WHICH MAY APPEAR WITHIN THE UPPER LEFT HAND 3" MARGIN. TITLE OR TITLES OF DOCUMENT. IF ASSIGNMENT OR RECONVEYANCE, REFERENCE TO RECORDING NUMBER OF SUBJECT DEED OF TRUST. NAMES OF GRANTOR(S) AND GRANTEE(S) WITH REFERENCE TO ADDITIONAL NAMES ON FOLLOWING PAGES, IF ANY. ABBREVIATED LEGAL DESCRIPTION (LOT, BLOCK, PLAT NAME, OR SECTION, TOWNSHIP, RANGE AND QUARTER QUARTER SECTION FOR UNPLATTED). ASSESSOR'S TAX PARCEL NUMBER(S) . (continued) A.L.T.A. COMMITMENT SCHEDULE B Page 3 Order No. 598448 SPECIAL EXCEPTIONS (continued): 1. EASEMENT AND THE TERMS AND CONDITIONS REFERENCED THEREIN, INCLUDING, BUT NOT LIMITED TO, THE FOLLOWING: GRANTEE: PURPOSE: AREA AFFECTED: RECORDED: RECORDING NUMBER: King County Water District No. 58 Water main South 30 feet of said premises July 20, 1960 5183320 2. EASEMENT AND THE TERMS AND CONDITIONS REFERENCED TBEREIN, INCLUDING, BUT NOT LIMITED TO, THE FOLLOWING: GRANTEE: PURPOSE: AREA AFFECTED: RECORDED: RECORDING NUMBER: Renton School District No. 403 Water lines A 10 foot portion of said premises September 21, 1962 5482862 The interest of said easement has been assigned to the City of Renton by instrument recorded under Recording Number 5801095. 3. EASEMENT AND THE TERMS AND CONDITIONS REFERENCED THEREIN, INCLUDING, BUT NOT LIMITED TO, THE FOLLOWING: GRANTEE: PURPOSE: AREA AFFECTED: RECORDED: RECORDING NUMBER: City of Renton Water line A 15 foot portion of said premises February 18, 1987 8702180421 4. EASEMENT AND THE TERMS AND CONDITIONS REFERENCED TBEREIN, INCLUDING, BUT NOT LIMITED TO, TBE FOLLOWING: GRANTEE: PURPOSE: AREA AFFECTED: RECORDED: RECORDING NUMBER: City of Renton, a municipal corporation Slope and drainage Westerly portion of said premises January 29, 2001 20010129001814 (continued) A.L.T.A. COMMITMENT SCHEDULE B Page 4 5. EXCEPTIONS AND RESERVATIONS CONTAINED IN DEED: Order No. 598448 FROM: Puget Sound Power & Light Company, a Massachusetts corporation RECORDED: RECORDING NUMBER: INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO THE FOLLOWING: April 30, 1951 4132659 Reserving therefrom to the first party, its successors and assigns, all coal. oil, and minerals and the mining rights lying in and under the said party and every part thereof, whether heretofore or hereafter, discovered with the right to mine, quarry, and procure the same at any time NOTE: No examination has been made to determine the present record owner of the above minerals, or mineral lands and appurtenant rights thereto, or to determine matters which may affect the lands or rights so reserved. 6. WATER SPECIAL CONNECTION CHARGE #123 AND THE TERMS AND CONDITIONS THEREOF: RECORDED: RECORDING NUMBER: October 13, 2003 20031013000893 7. Unrecorded leaseholds, if any; rights of vendors and holders of security interests on personal property installed upon said property and rights of tenants to remove trade fixtures at the expiration of the term. 8. The property herein described is carried on the tax rolls as exempt; however, it will become taxable from the date of transfer to a taxable entity. TAX ACCOUNT NUMBER: 292305-9102-03 If the forthcoming transaction involves a transfer to a taxable entity, information from the Department of Revenue should be provided to the closer, prior to closing, regarding the lien of taxes for prior years. NOTE: PLEASE CONTACT THE KING COUNTY ASSESSOR'S OFFICE AT 206-296- 5151 OR ONLINE AT "WWW.METROKC.GOV/ASSESSOR" TO VERIFY THE TAX AMOUNT DUE, AS EXEMPT TAXES ARE SUBJECT TO CHANGE WITHOUT NOTICE. (continued) A.L.T.A. COMMITMENT SCHEDULE B Page 5 Order No. 598448 9. Title is held by a church incorporated under the laws of the state of Washington. It may sell, conveyor mortgage the property only in accordance with its By-Laws and pursuant to the Discipline of any Mother Church with which it may be affiliated. A proper showing of said authority must be submitted. NOTE 1: SPECIAL TAXES AND CHARGES, PAID IN FULL: YEAR: 2005 TAX ACCOUNT NUMBER: 292305-9102-03 AMOUNT BILLED SPECIAL DISTRICT: $1.86 $5.00 TOTAL BILLBD. $6.86 PAXD. $6.86 END OF SCHEDULE B Title to this property was examined by: Myron Sizer Any inquiries should be directed to one of the title officers set forth in Schedule A. cc: SecuraSite/Portland, OR/Attn: Bjorn Morfin can/4902678/5098735 Portion HE ~ NW ~ ;' i I i i -"7:= 29-23-5 -_. tL----:-'----------;;;:;;-: \-2.--:-~.-. ----------nt=oFWT---oiif .• ~ .......... ----.. --....!JlJ!l&. __ ~. ':'-".J.-s :m; Ii 1.= GGSjpC. E .1 i i ~ PACIFIC NORIHWEST TITLE Order No. 598448 Company of Washington. Inc. IMPORTANT: This is not a Plat of Survey. It is furnished as a convenience to locate the land indicated hereon with reference to streets and other land. No liability is assumed by reason of reliance hereon. N t IIlUllclpaL corporntion, pur8u811t to re!t)lutbn ',,!Qvte1 by tho flu~r't "f Director'8 ther'eof Ln re,ular .e"lun un ~I'rt, ;'4, i"Stl, f .. ,' .. "I 1.-. cons ldar"Uon ',f the su. or EHlliT TIiUIJSA!1I1 (fa," 1\).0.0) DOl.I.Ai':: In h,-n" paid, barsutn., .ell .... ",I convey. unto the rll<ST Ph~:~II~Tr:flUI ~HURCH OF ~F.NTO., WlSHLIGTOa, A .Rshln~ton corporatton, the roLlawlaa deser1be1 real "lIta't.a situAte'! 1n th" ';"Wlty "I' KJne, ~t~t;! of Wuhlngtonl Th,'t !Jortion or the "orthf!Hst t of tha !forthwast t of llecUOA ;i9, TownsnJp:lJ !furth, Hense ~ ""st, ".M., Unl COWIty, 1I ... h1ngt.on, ,te£"rlbe" "I follows, 8elllMlnc ~t th .. ~outh ..... t cornar o)J' M.lo1 NorthlM.t t of the lIorth" •• t t; th'l/I~e I. 'lIo';>'JII_ ~; •• "''11C the Ii ..... th UI1," of •• ld "' .. rtn ••• t t of the lIurth" •• t t 87. II fa .. t 'to the true polnt of be,lnnlnal ttllUice conttnuiaa I. 88°12' )8-g. ~~O.OO teet; then',. If. 1°4;"40" 1':. 749.115 feet, th"n~a I. 1511017'20-II. 191.1>7 het tv tha !':utarly 11Ae 01' t.he ilen!Jun "Gad (St .. t .. j,,,,,d 10. ~C); thanea Southa,'ly .LCIIIC 8"ld K".ter1, Hn. on • curv" tu ~h., rl,ht wlth •• radlue 01' l4O;:."'c" reet • dlltl<ne. of 457.4:< ra .. t, thAnea eonUnuine 111"111 .. ld ~ •• terl, ltne on D curwe to lart with" ra41uo nr 447.08 r.et, a oUtllnee ot' 20' .95 r .. et to the true : olnt 0" 1)<,,1nnlng. Oullt.1n1ne r'our "cre. I80ra 01' l .. s •• SUBJI>CT TO, 1. I-: •• e.ant ror te1 .. ph_ .nd te La,rarm tron •• 1,al,on hna •• arented by 1n.t~nt ,..curied October "I, 19~~, un,lar "udltor'l f1le '0. 1~b2041. ? Eltcaptloa. and ra ~al'Va tlona contstned ln ~",,'I trOll "uC.t r ,unit I'"",ar .nd Li,ht ';;oapan)' dlfted ll'r11 J, .1."1 .. , r.corJed AprLl lu, 1951, under Aud1tor'. YL1e Woo 41J'o~9. III WITliUlI; IIHII/(I::Ot', a.&14 cor"orl ,tlQA has cllu •• 1 tlil .. 1n~tru MAt to be executed II)' J.U pro"er ol'fleer. nnd 1t. corporate ... H1 to be h""euto .tfin" thl; ~ :1a), "f M!!)" l'l511. IIt:ItI'OI SCliOOL DI8!'iUCT '0. 40). Ktne Count" Stat. of V •• hlactan. S" Ri. ... c?:.r .ad' Pr.aJ4ent I I , DIID __ ,n. ........ __ ... _, ..... ,. IIMI\~ ..,...1 •. ,. .. lit ... -....... '1 .......... _ ., .. (" .00' IIIIWMl la ... ,.14. 1UWDl ... · •• u., .. ......,. _ a. CIIIIIfft, a IIYb1l11\011 _'p.l ........ " .... , U. foUoda& .... arlt-H Nal •• tete .'_CM la \III 0Iua,¥ of 1'111 ... "" of ...... ~. for roM "..,...., ..... )O,..\ ... U.~ ...... I ... ~1 'ftoA, ,anI';" of .. ...-., t.· ' .......... , l or ... ,,1 .. 29. ~Ilp Jj IanII. ..... , ".', II. II., rot M,II a.-'t. ~"'u.c-. __ I'" .. reu ... ·•· ,,1.'111 ,,' \lie ..... \IIMa., "'""lIP Dr _14 1IGP\Iwu" t CIt IhD ,,*,,-8\ • ~ I.. _ •. '18"' 12' JIl" •• 4a1!11 ~ .... 'h u_ of MI. 1IIIrU-.' i ., _ -.u-., • 0'(. Tr .... ' III U. \PIle po:", of Ioeat ..... l ~ _'1"1111 I. ~12'J8· •• 2)0,00 .... ", U-I. I Io;!'W I, 7/09." I'M\I ~ I. "'1"':/0" II, 191."7 .... , '" 1.1,. ... tarl,r UM of \.lie .... 101M (1\& ....... )C); ~ ~i' ,,~ ... .:.4 "wp) ... :10' .. '\ ... _ '" \.lilt P4Ih\ ,,,,,,. _1 ... or j"~"9 r, .. \ " .' .e'" of 108'T.~ .... ,,' I.be __ ll1Ul~ a,- _111 .... lMI'ly I' (1ft. _ UI .. tt "'UI • _lUll ", "7.b!! I'M" ••• ,..... Of2O)." .... ' '" \.lie \PIle POI"" ot bec'-1II(,. ~~'ft-... f:t ; .. ~·~'!"~·;,1r' '!:~t!'I\I~:' .. ~ •. "~.~:. f".: Ell III'RIIIII IIIIIIUIIP, ... , .... .,.--u""' ............ .-1 &Ii •• 'aeu-...n" .... be .~_ lit .t. I'I'"P"1' Dtr, .... tal< ~k) .. t JU1f, lon'~' ft..\'1'1""""" ! ... CXUft Ill' IDO . CIa \ill. -'"'k) of J\J •. y, 19'",. to.t.,,.. ... ,. 1.1. _ro;~. a. I , rV··"Pthl J11 Ioloel')' 'IdHl,-ftfi;r to.. ..... ,J\ate "'011~. mu'3 ~ .. ~~ .. r .... lll.,...,. . .., -II': . an. ~. ~ ~ t .... ~ "n,*" \n" t 1I.4I'n: ON r:,'. ~c.S-c\. ..... .,. ~:crpo"L.or. \ .. "t, ._~ ... \he "&0,'" :M""-'nt.. WId 4&c:.~nr"'l ... ~ \.I.e _ill ~ftIt~a'l \10 III r.... UId • ..,i.Utl ..... ) .. ~.t. UId 480ed ot ... 4 CNrpu ... \~QI •• r.'r u.-. b .. a ... ~ .. "'''''''" _at. «IIW4. GII4 un ,*Ul It.taWd .... L \.hel """ .uth'.rh .. \.a •• dY'\e \he .al'" .. r .. ~tU .... totat. tho _i .rti •• 1 ••• .:orpvr.w .... "r .... 4 ~t.lOD.· ~ fit, .... uad uttiO;.~ ... l i""\o .rriMld U. 4a,y"" ,.... ·i.e U,:II Cl .. UtloMW .... , ... .,.1\"",. ; .. .' ._ ' .. ~ nJ.t ..... ~r'~..., .~ l_ ... t: t.I._ u _y be __ aU")'. t.o ... t.er ~'2upoA •• 1.4 pr'>plltt.y t.'!' ~ ... pou'pue. 0' ~t""t.l"', r."'lI~U"' .• a.nlH) ~ f:::.c~U\O .. U.,.·; ".~Q __ ~Ih or'IIeU..,·.., __ t ...... ~&., ... ';WJ'OI •. lDiI!I.d.,q .My '1..,.1 Olil~,"tl_. ~ UOlUt, ~.ifcia: I .~~ \lIiott; _ ~u.fti..., 0' ..... _ ... .aia . . "'" 111 ~. d,..t~f._r .• "'U:_ ...... ~cu' ... oe .... tl'Of'ed.-- tMy au dI..~urbOl4 OIIcs-..:~oy.~, th.y Wlll.boon':~ __ lD: ••• n~ •. ~~~ :.,' . ~ lOll .. UIa)' ..... e . a.-dt.t~l;·It· f~' "die ~I't,:t _ •• A~ ' ....... by t ... . "-. . .• ·Y.'. ;.':' '.':.,.':;:.: ... ;.:, : .. :. ., .... :.; .. :,:::> :," ·Tlt.:·G;. ... :;' ....... "n ntt41 .. ··t:.,. rl9"·t .t.(' u_·t ... ·.ai-f_· of ioU ............ , .. . . . . eO .1Gft9 .... ," ..... " ..... l\OIt ~n'.& te •• wita. "a,e ·, .. UUauOll .... 4 .... rit_ of the -41tH ~U= II~ 8,' "-'I" .... ~Jft IiNld ..... or:.t.ructuna __ ..... ,',ut -_r. ~.'<:;:' .... ; .. " :.' :':;; -' .. ,~'",: 'I'IIt. _t :.""U: ... ·~.~ ..... n,'l'tnsMt..v:.iLltt ... ~'. ,:jUl20. ~~ " .. :'.:.. i.;. ... '0; .•.• " ' . EASEMENT }l'or a valuable oonsideretion, reoeipt ot vh10h is hereby ~o1m'owiedged, the Grantor, i'he }l'1iost Presb7terian Churoh ot Renton, Wae111l18ton, a WashingtoD COl'pczl'ation, hereby 8l'ants aDd OODVII}B to the Grantee, Renton School Distrlot BD. ~O~, Xing County, Washi~g too, their sucoessors anll asslgns, the r~t, prlvilege and authority to oonstruct, l~ove, rapair aDd .aint.l0 vato. liDes ooa.l.tlng or under8l'ouod pipill8 and appendages aoro88, over and upon the following land, looated In King County, St~te or Wa.h1ngtOD, t~.~.: rbat portion of the Northeast t of the Nortbweat t of Seotion 29, TOWDSbip 23 Nortb, Range 5 Eut W.M., King County, Washington, desorlbed as tollows: Beginning at the Soutbwest oorner or oaid Northeast t or tbo Hartbwest fl thenoo Borth, ' 88°1?'38ft Eaat along til. SOIItll Un.e or .&14 Bortheaat t of the HOI't"at t 87.77 te,et to thetl'lle polnt or beginning; thenoo oootinn1ng liorth 88012'38-Baat 250.00 teetl theao., Rrpth 10U'40" ill&at 7~9.65 toetl tbeDoe liOl'th 8s017'20 west 191.67 toet to the Basto~ 11ne of the BeuoD Rqa4( IItate ro~ lio. ScI; thenos SlI\itberlJ &lolia s.14 Buter~7 line on a oupve to the'"ri'lII1t tlith a 1'&411&0 of 1462.69 teet a dhtanoe of ~87.1j2 teetl ,t~l1oe 00Ilt1au.1Q& IllGII8 Bald lI;aator13' 11no on a carle, to tbe lett 1dtb " 1'.,41U/1 ot"1447.68 teet, a d18tal1oe 'of 285.95 teet to tbe true polnt at be~lnning, oontalning tour aorell more 01' loaa. i'he desoription ot the Basement la as tallows: Beglnnlng at a polDt located 441.70 teet Horth 10 42T40· Baat at the Southeast cornor or the JIl'OJII r1;J' desor1be4 In the toresoingl tbeBO •• 1I1tlna1ac-.~:' . 10h2"~0· East 10.10 reet, thenoe due west to tbe Bast'-eriy line at the Benson Roall (State Roall Bo. S-clJ then"s Southerly along sald Easterl;y l1ne on a ..... -.,) to the dabt vi th a radius ot 1462.69 teot a dhtanos or 10.20 teetl thonoe due East to the point ot beglnning. In the event (hoaotor~ at anf time in the 1'uture, deelree to use sald abovo 4esc1'ibed pr"'l'erty 1'01' BIll' purpose 1'01' v1110h the above described Okse.-at wou14 1nter1'e1'e, tinen and 1n suoh event Grantee &gPOo. to re-looate .aid underground plpelino at .noh other looatlGD Dn tbe .bove de.cribed property all shall be acoept- able to G.lllltor, suoh relooation to be .t t.hc 1I01e oOllt .nd expen.e Dt Grantee. It is tlw lntont boreo1' tbat thb B ..... nt sball be l1li4 -1- '-.J"fI" ~:.,<~'-\ . :~~;. .:~ .~~- .. -_.... •.• "_. _. ," .". . ... -'1 .. ot'-......... 'S.... " .......... '.""":".-=" <...; \. ..... :;: 'J,' ... ~. .. it "(11 berebf Jlade a oonnant Nnn1na v1tb tbe land. DI W:mmss vmmBOP. the. llaid 0:r~t.9f ~ .• II~ol1ted tbis lDstrWunt tbe 11 ~ ~ ot September, 196Z. ,,' ..• , ,r, ,;J STATE Il' VASHIBO'l'0Il1 ss. c 0IlJI'fi OF XDiG On th1s I) If. dq ot Septemb~ .• 1'1&. bet.or.lI. _. t.be under- signed, a HotU7. p1iJi'llii in aa4 tor the State '~"allb1Dgton, dLtly oolll1l1uloned aDd 1IVDl'I\o.pel'lIonallI appeaH4 . I: all4 )1, III • 5hw jA:m··r :£ Io!AJ 0 lie lmofolD·..l'P:!!'0"lt5e:"'1:t'l:n~e~]iJOw::.e..,.=a.tr:l(lr:e"'n~t-d''-·tbe BOaH iii' Trwi1ieaa jM ,tliCi, seoritlih' ot tb .. Board of Tl'Ua~.~:, re- Ipeot1'1011. or thelmaT PRB __ IAB ollllRaa OF RBII'.l'Olf. tbe oorporation that exell\l.ted the f01'lIao"lI8 iutJowient, '~4 aolmovl~B'\the lald inatl'Wll8Dt to be~ trlle ~d vollllltarr .. 10 aDd deSd' or .&1d OOl'pOl'ation, tor the 11111. &lUI pll.l'pcMIIII therein m,entilJlI8d •. lII!d 00 oatb Itatlld that tbeT are allthel>hed ·to eMollt.e the Idd inltrwaent and that tbe slIal &ttued i. tb.e olll'Jloratll .1Ia1 or Bald lIorpGz'at1:on. WI'l'HB9S IIQ" Mad aDd ottioial Ileal beret·) &trixed t.~ dl¥ aII4 TSU' rirst above writteD. ~~n~1I at. Was Jlgton, rse1dlll8 .,t"ltllnton • •• 1 'I ~ -2- i ... i ..sSIGIIKI!IIT or IWIIl111111t IIII£B&\S a c .... taill ea.emaat bad beretofon beeD graatcd to tbe IlENlOI SCilDOL DISTRICT 110. 403. Uag CowIt,. W ... blDgtoa by tbe nRST P\I&SII'l'tIll1All CllUIICB of Ile<oll. whlcb ea ...... at bolo beea duly recorded em September 21. 1962. Itiaa Couat, .. uditor'. Ilecelvlag 110. 5482862 pertalal.ag to tbe cOl18t ...... t1G1l. lmprov ..... Dt. upalr IUId 1DA1ateJUlou:e of certain vater 11nea aad applR'taaaocu tbereto, aDd IIlIBRI!AS tbe UIIl'OII lICIIDOL DlS"!II1CT i. delm" • .,f .aolB"lllB .ald .... _; __ to the City of batOD. a 1IIIll\icl.pai corporatloa. l ..... ...,b a. Illd ... tar UD.I bave bereto· fore bOeD cODveyod ad 80ld uato tbe CIT! or REIImlI for _lat_ace. lOW tBBlUOU 1M COIISIDBIlATlOB of the .... of Ona 1)o11.r ..... other aood aDd valuable coasiderstloo RElltOII SCIIJOL DISTRICT RD. 4u3, 1tl"8 CouDt,. WaohlagtOD, bereby alll""" oats over, t.ransfera, c01lveyl and quit clalma IIDto the CIn OF RDnmI, ,& lIUIllclpal corporatloa., all of lt8 rlgbe aad iDeeTeat 1D aad to tbat certala e.aeaaeat hereinabove referred to, which easement 1. moTe partlcQlarly cleecrlbed a. folloW8. to-vit: l'bat portloa of tbl IIorth ... t l of tba lIenbvelt ~ of SeeUoa 29, :r....a.hlp Z3 IIortb, B. 'llBe 5 Ka.t, W,K., UD8 County, WaobtDBtOD. dea"dbed .. foU ...... le8laain:; at tbe loutbvest comer of laid \IOrt.b.lt k of the lIortbveat I" tbeace lonb aaD12'38" Kalt alona tbe SOUth liDe of Bald Borth .... \; of tbe lor_at \; 87.n fr.t to tho true poiDt of bealDD1na; tbeDCe cootimala8 \IOrtb 88 12 '38" Kaet 25U.UO feet; tbeac. IIortb 1°42 'IoU" £au 74~.65 feet; tbs~e IIortb ee"17 '20" "'est 1fi1l.67 feat CD tbe &.1.t81'Iy line of t.be BeMon load btate road Bo. SC); Lb .... c. Soutbsrl, aloag add &aBterly liDe OD • curve to tloa rlBht 'lth s radlu. of 1462.69 feet .. dletaace of 487.41 feet; tbeace coati •• lD8 alD&lB aaid lasterly ltae OD a "arve to tbe leU ___ •. D rddl"'; of 447.68 feet, a dlotaoce of 2a5.~5 feet to tbe true polnt of beg1D.D1na. cODeaiuiDI four acres more or Ie •• n"lc dC!8crlpttoa of the Eaaemeut 18 a. (ollowa: Jlealoaiaa at a polDt loeatood 441.7U feet Hortb 104Z '/00" Kaot of tbe Sotoat'baut cOt'aer of the property deac:rtbed tn the for8101q; thence contillulq Hot'tb 1°42140" Baal 10.1u {e~ti thence duo West to tbe Eo8Url7 ltne of the lenson I\r>ud ( St .• Le llDad Bo. 5-<:); tb<IDCe Southerly al01l& said Easterly lint: 011 II :ut'va to the r1abt witb a radtul of 14bZ.b'l feet a dlstufKe of lO.2U feet; 'ReQCe due Ea.~ to tbe point of boalnal",; all situate 1" .... lng Coullty. State or \ldablagton. -1- I ......,.i~ r .. .? ..i. :. ~,/. ,~ t I , 'I t , , , ... ! . ·~i· · ........... ,. >,."- ;.)0"/ .. .., . . r;;>· '" .. ,. e_~~~~:.> alld Llw Ch, of .... tOll. by ace.,tilla tbla Aa.lpMat. alre .. to .-p1,. witb cbe cerma U 1I11B1!SS IIBIIIIIIIF tbe .aid Gralltor bea exec"ted tbb iDltr.-ellt <be t!tJL.d.,. nCCEPTIII BY , aa COIIIW or Dill OD chie I~' of ~tV 1116 • befora ... <be lIDder'l&Md. a lotary '!IIbUe ill alld for' tbe State of w.ab1aatOll. dul, ..-ba1olled dM .won peraolllU, oppurad _________ C~l~a~r~anc~e~L~.~I~UD~.~t=iDI~ ____ _"aM ______ ~B~.~.~.~J~,..~!Oft~~ ______________ __ to 11M!' knOlWft to be the _..IPrWl.U!!.,!;1d!!lm!!BIt'-___ ~-___ .I!JIC!ISIUW'II.IIQlf-_____ reape:;..tlvely of IlBIi'.tOII SCHOOL DIll lIn III. 403. tbe rorporatioD tbat _.uted tb. fonao1D& iDltr_t liM aek_ladaad tbe .dd lutruMllt to b. tbe fr ...... "..l .... ta~ act aad dead of edd corpora. loll. f01: tbe .......... ",rpo ••• t"'rull _tiOlled. ·.DeI 011 oatb atatad tbet tbey a .. a"tbori"ad to _ute the Idd 1IIIItrumellt aDel tbat tbe ._1 affl'" 1a the corporat. leal of .ald corporeUOII. Wl'D1D8 .., bead aDel official ... 1 hereco MUi .... CM cia, aDd ,_r 10 tbi. certificate abo_ ¥Tit.tea_ -l- Bot.n Pub! to: 111 aad for .he Seau of W •• b1;.. ...... r .. ld1D& at .... '011. 'I'" ., \ .', .. j j j j j j j j j j j j j j j j j j j j j j j j j j j j j j j j j I j = = C"Io Return Addrell City Clerk's Office City of Renton lOSS South Grady Way Renton WA 98055·3232 Title EASEMENT FOR ROADWAY Slope aDd Draiaage e 11111111111 WlIIIB'2!! as I II til.P,lier 1", COUNTY, III Property Tax PareeI Number: 191305-9101 8cosoD Avenue: S Bcnsoo Avenue S &. S 27U1 S_ . rG=-n-D~ro-~~17~:----------------------rG~nn~~~~-')-·------·----------------·--- I Fust Prcsbytenan Church of Renton I City of RenlOn. a MUniCipal Corporation GranlOr for and m consideration of Mutual Benefits, does by these presents, grant, unto the City of Renton, a MuniCipal Corporation, Grantee herem, Its successors and assigns, an easement for publiC roadway purposes wnh necessary appurtenances over, under, through, across and upon the followmg descnbed real estate, for RIght-of-Way purposes, situated tn the County of Kmg, State of Washtngton LEGAL DESCRIPTION The westerly 8 feet of the follOWing parcel for slope and dramage, ALSO that portion of the followlPg parcel for dnveway traffic conrtol and other roadway purpo~~ beginning at a POint on the west hne of said parcel 0PPO~lte engmeer's station 107+24, thence easterly 10 a POint 5S feet opposite SolId engineer's station, thence northerly 10 a POint S5 feet opposite engmeer's station 108+10, thence westerly to a pomt on the west hne of~ld parcel op~lte '>!lId engtneer's station, thence southerly along the west hne ot said parcel 10 the POint of beglnnmg Parcel: BegIDDIDg at the Southwest Comer 01 the HE 1/4 of the NW % of SeeUon 29, Towuablp 13 North, RaDge 5 Eo WoM. ID Kmg Conaty, WasblagSon, Thence N 88-12-38 E 87.77 leet ro the Pomt of BegIDDlUg; Theuce N 88-11-38 E 250 feet; TlleDce N 01-41-40 E 749.65 reet; 1'beace N 88-17-10 W 191.67 feet ro the Easterly Lme olBeDllOn Road; Theace Southerly alODg Said Easterly Lme 773.37 reet ro the PolDt ofBeginumg; LESS CIM RgtrI Less Co Rd TOGElllliR WITH a Temporary Construcuon I:asement over the westerly 30 teet of the south half of S81d parcel for the purpose of constructmg slopes and dnnnage facilitIes The Grantee shall. upon completIOn of any worlt Wlthm the property. restore the surface, and any pnvate Improvements dIsturbed or destroyed dunng exec:utton of the work, as nearly as practIcable to the condition they were IR ImmedIately before commencement of the work or entry by the Grantee 11115 Temporary ConstruCllon Easement shall become effecllve upon executIon by the Grantor from date hereof. and shall contmue for SIX months 1111~ ~ent shall run With the land described herein, and shall be binding upon the partlelo, their helB, successors In mterest and assignS from date hereof Pea< 101 2 = = en IN WITNESS WHEREOF. said Grantor has caused tillS IRslrUment to be ex~iC'!l.MtI!~~IIY of .:rN(JIAgv • ~ ~ Approved and Accepted by' Grantor: Fim Presbyterian Church of Relit 011 ByQ~n~ f~ct1/Jy ru CItyCler Notary <,cal mu ... be WIthin be" c> ~~~~~~~~~~--t-----~~~~~~---------------------------------4 Notary Seal mu'lt be Within 11m< = <=> c ... , !.TA1[or WASH1NGlON ISS COUNTY OF K1NG I On th .. I \-d day of J~ ~. !>cIon. me "",,,,l1dIly .spp<. ... cd ~~:t'" IJ,~T/!'.,r.t\ _t .. m,~nownto be=:=1 __ "'d _ ~ oltltc:wrporatlonllwl ex the wltlun mslnlmcnl, .mel nowledgc the ""d IMItUment to be 1hc IRe and voluntaty act and deed of'l8ld unpomllon. tor lhe u_ ""d purposes thcrcln menltoncd. and each on oath .wed th.!r bel"'" WO\ oIII!boruallo execuu. ... d In\lrumcnl and th.II Ih. 'oLd! .1IflXcd " Ih ..... rpo'dl. \Cdl 01 .... Id wrpo'ottlOR l ~ t t I t I f· r i ~ I ~.' r t '.~ 1 t t.; f ~ 1 ~ ;., r :;. t, , .. f- " :'~, :." .'';': .-, .#"" .' ,. MOtTIlAGB mrteaaes to SYIIJJ OF IIASIDG1tII-AJ.\SIA of dIB IIG1IID PiillSBilBIIM IHIOl iD the LM1ED STA11lS Of MERlO\. DC ••• ~ CDIJIDIat!-::a. dIB fDll.clldlla described real _tate. situated iD the 0auIIt1 of IJIW • State of Wah_tal nat port_ of tht H.E. 1/4 of the N ••• 1/4 o£ Section Z9, -r-hip 23 N., .... 5 E •• oM.. nsw camtr. Ifuh •• cleM:r1bed as: IeIIiImiDII at the s .•. COI1IBI' of said N.E. 1/4 of the N ••• 1/4; tIHmce N.-"" 11' ." B ....... tht S. U_ of Mid N.E. 1/4 of the H ••• 1/4 87.71 ft. to the tNe poiDt of beaiJmiDI; tbence CIDIltiJlldJla N,. 88° l1.' 38" B. 250.00 ft.; t!..::e N. I" 42' 40"-1. 749.65 ft.; thIInce N. 88° 17' 20''' •• 1::1.67 ft •. to • IIDter1y liDe of the lIIDsan IlDad (State .... No. 5C); tbence liautlla'ly a1mIa said Euterly liDe Oft a curve to the riP': nth a ra4ius of 1462.69 ft. a dist8DCe of 487 .42 ft.; tbID:e cxmt .... 1IIIIIIII saW 1lutc17 1JDe l1li. a curve to left nth • 1'IIIlius of.',.' ft ••• ~ of ••• ft ..... ,.. poJIIt \)~ lIIIi-1,., ;;M .,_. 'm._. ~(_." ... ¥C.rf. .. »,., .. e ,~.~ .. ,-.-.. -~ .. ~.~ ,)5:::2:;:::- ,. r '.~ Portion of said cIeIIc:ribe&l ... l~SaatIl of a strip of 1aDl IUd including said strip. ~ilIeIl as 60 ft. In:-:' ft. on ilither sid.; of the followini t1esaibId cmI8I'lJIIe: at the intersect.iIm OIl tile E. line of said IUb-diYUiaIl.wlth the center line of 10th Oautt No. as estllblisbed in the plat of~, -=ordiDa to tbe plat reamIed iD Vol. 68 of~. pap 32. ncords of DDR ~. lfuh •• tbImc .. Westerly .... tlt9ac of a a&ne to tbe r1&ht. r..slus ef 100 ft., a c.'.1st8DCe of 78.53 ft.; tbmIceH •. 4O" 24' 10".. 38 ft., tMnI;e Westerly alema t: III'C of a cum to 12Ie. left. radius of 100 ft., a distaDce of 78.18 ft.; tb8nce N. 88" 12' 16" •• to a point em the.. liDe of said sub-divisian saill poiDt lieU. the Easterly teIILbus of the center liDe of 10th CIlIIl't N. .. established In the plat of Albert Balch' 5 Presideat hrk No. 12 ~ to plat namIed iD\bl. 61 of Plats •. lla.l.e 96 rec:ards of KiaI Oauaty. ....... alsO .a:ePt. tbat port1.CIIl l)'lJ1J N.·· Of mi! -• 60 ft. wide strip of limd desc:i'iW hereiD. • f-'~~< r ,. ;~ .... ;. ~ -"~·i...~i. ::.~; ':n.-(.., ·~"'.I:·.L~f".: J" . .l..',!-G' I,', ";:.;4!' .;:. ~J~~:t ";-."'U.f.' : .. ~~.~:: ~~.,:;:; ... 7·b".~:;;··~f!.t;J~.:...,';I:;::-,:;';' I' .. • ~:.:;.:--:~~ r .:~. . r ...... ~1 '.~; .~'. : : .. -.~}. ;:.. :'~':" ,'~' c.c~J.'f.l'; ~:::--;"l/",.q !~ .. :P' :1;", -'i ','~ --;:( :':<:; .';-1';:" .... .'(~ :r.!~I; .,.;til\ f.'; .~?,;"'j~ ',) :~: .. ,_ ""li-, • ., ;)! i" .' ~T ';:':'.-, ,". •. i \:""-', r '" ":~; •. .!.I ,\_, :.t'.' ,;-;:~:I . . -.j , " ,·t'!·.·· '",:;" :;.: ......... ;;:. '.; ·:.:i.~~H':;· .' '.'" <.!! ~. ~-, 1, t ... .'·,..;.:.} . . '~l,:: .;, ': -.'" -'·'.~·l;..' .,;:. to seaare ~ of the _ of1hirty 11IausIaIIl1lllll1III/lOO --------------------- Dollars ($ 30,000.00 ) and iDte2est, accarcliJIa to the terms of ODe or mre p1'GIIisso%y notes _ or bIInai'IIer ..:uted by the la'tp&OrII and to secme ad- ditional IIIIJIies as lIIBY be 1-.1 by tile IIIQltpaee to the IIIDt'tpaOr for tile p.D'- pose of CIIIIStruCt1Gn lID, npairillJ. -tiJII, alteriD&. acIdiDg to or iD;Irovina tile mortpged property, or err ]IC't thereof. or for my other pupose web the ~ _:lders to be for its best iDteNst.. If the JIIDJ'tp8e imdebtecJDess is evidace<l by ~ dian __ , the mrtp;ee ., credit pIQIIIIeDtII ftCBiwd by it upob l1li)' of IIIIicl DOtes, or put of l1li)' ..-nt lID one _ and part OIl -mer, as the ~ lIIBY elect. '!he ~ property is DDt used priDc:lpally for IIfrlcultural or fam- 1Dg JIU1lIOS8S. '1he JIID1"t&II&IIrS ~ with tile .mppe as foU-: that they are tile owners ill fee sDlple of all of tile aIJcqe cleIIc:ribIId ftIILl estate; that they will, cIuriDa tile c:untUum:e of this mrtpae, peDI1t lID _te of said pnIIIises, will c:aaplete all buUdiDp. st:ructIInIII. or other ;bop: I 8 be1Dg built or about to be built thenIan, ...s tIUl ~ befaI'e cIBlJJIIpmt, ell ~ _ ad _~ tberean aDd IIpGIl th1s lIOJ1pp 01' lIpCIII the ~ or debt SIICIII'8Il hereby, will keep the prapnty ~ of all11as or ............ ~ tile autpi6ii'. IOCUrity, 8IIIl will Jr.eep tile buUdiDp 1:bereml i'll a-J Np8ir ad cmti lll,,'8\y iDsurecS apiDst fin by _ ftIIPCI"IibJ. s-aIIpIII,Y or carpmles utisfact:lfty to the 1IICII't-aaaee for at le8IIC 'I1Iirty 1IIauaIIiI .. l1li/100 --------.----------------------.--. DI>llaft. ($30,000.00 ) ml ..-mst.ct.Ip and ctlm'huuds aDd c:asualties ill such -=s ad for such pIIriacSs • ..,. be ftI(IIiI'8Il by tile IDI'tp&IIe for 1:be IIIJItpa_'. pzatec:tiGB. __ all ~ pa1icies to be IIJIIIorsed and de- UVIIH!l to the ~. IJI _ till AI1'tp&Or sball fUl to ~ err ~ of priJlcipal or illteftSt sec:uni1 bereby "'-clue .arto lIMp or pm"fIIIII ur CIMIDIII11: or 11&_ afontsai.d, tIImlthe wbolAt !aWl ...... ·tIelWT __ sball fllrtbwith becaIIe clue and ~,. the eleo:tiaII of .. ~. If suit be brcuaht lIpCIII th1s mrra.. or U.-, attIInIII7be ~ to.c»1Jec:t A1d ~ FiDr to suit, ~ pr.l-. to JIIIY a I Me __ .~ fee, a4 sball pay '.' tr;· ~~,~ ... ~ COIJt of: .; .. :':' "'::~~'::.~ eM _ .. .., be incwIwd til Iorwcl . :: .•. _.~. . ."'" .tdcla _ IIhal1 be --.s . ....., :::. .. -. ., .... ~ .... of enwci_. . '11.1$ ~i;..~ aIIJ.~~ ~lt_ Iball ~ ... IIId JII¥IIble ~.ly ...... ~'a -s. Ita' leetl~ CIIIIIIICtlIlD widl tbt GIMral .-..Illy of till Dd.1III "...,tlfte 0Iurdl !7' ... Unites Statu of Allln'IA. CIIIUlaa to triat .. • _1 .. lIatlea. fal1ln'e to _ tile atnac;ture encte4 lID tile pna.. cIacriIIIcI /an'ebJ ... ctudI 1IuilAItJtt. or diwnilla itself of title to die v-t.-. IN III1JGI8S 1IIiIBI'. sailS ~ hu caJINd thia w'-t to be tIXIIICIIte4 by iu pIqIft' off1CIftS ... ita CDqIIIr&te -.1 to be '--'to affbIo4 mu .,of STA11i OF lWIIJIG(II ) ) as 01tlJY OF DNG ) 01 tJW Jf f"'. G¥ of ml tile ... "~4.&. .,~ ~f. IdmI _. persaaally appeared to III knaMn to be nspec:tlve1y, of PDSr i n .... ~ OF 1ENl'CII. ICUIIIIGlIIC tba CDlpCJtat1a:l dIat IIIIIIC:!ad die fOreplDa ~. GIl lIdIDaorledpd the saiel iDa'-t to be tile flee GIl W\8Itay Kt GIl dIIIIcl of sailS eotporatiaa, for the _ GIl purp!IIe8 tbeIeia _ilJDed. GIl lID oath SUIBd that tbDy ue mthcJr1zed to ~. tile aU ~ ... dIat die .-1 8ff1D4 18 the COIJIIIIate aeal of saicl ccnparaUaa. .' './ f;, HI I 1 ... o o o o - :'., i' ..... ' ..... ~ . . :;:.\' ;,. ..• ~~. f ~. ,': ..•... ~ : .' . ',It.· '. '!./.: .,.( as -'-"-"-" Of' .... __ ••.• !l[QL'EST 01-' . tmOC1' • 9 54 ~ft.:".'~f;l-,. ,'''' .. iI.A1 ..... ~~."" *,.~L .. D. __ ~~~~~~~.~~~r- '-.'--'.-:', , ~. r UTILITllI " !A!!!!!l IIBEIItD I. illS I.'IIIUT •• de l"I1 __ .., .'r ____ .... _I""':'!I"'IIII'W_--I'~ fb 18 II r:; "" ,., ~ .......... ftn~ Preabyu~1aD Clmrch of"'I ___ ':':~:"";;;";:':"'::"':':" ____ _ BYTHEi;··.· .• I-:tNO!'" --JIP~s~ftft~---------------------~ ... ~-----AAr~8~i~.ni~~5~:.~I~ .. ~.~'~.I~UH_!t----.....--: ______________________ ----------~~~--~.~.--~K~~~C~~~;!N!-~'r~----------~ ----------------------~~I------------------------ ".rellla',wr "11_ "Crllllor!.'''. MIll lhl CITY OF "TOIl •• IIuIIlclpel Corpo,.tI ... f "'''' tout, ...... , ........ hlrellilfl., coiled "GrillI ..... VllUSSETlh The, HI4 ',antt'rC.). for 11111 I. _I.,.clo:-0' Che •• 0' S~_ ..... _ ..... .,..._ ,..1 .. II, I, ... , ........ o'hlr ... 1 ..... 1. _1.ro,I ... aD II; "'c ... IIfti----P .. -.-... "c"".-.-,,..,..,. .. =I ...... '-."' .... =in"" ....... II. -r. endwa"., ... 10 chi Hid " ... 1 ••• It _ ___ I ........ 1 ....... __ c for p .... llc utilltl •• (lnch ... lnt WC., ..... _r) with _.H" .".,'e_. _'. , ............ ecrol .......... chi '.II_lnt .... crl ..... pnperr, III IIIID '-cr, 1111111",1011 •• r. pa,tlcul.rl, llelCrlboll •• f.IlM0t02da 6 0 .0421 REeD!'" .0 CASHSL 1<"'*"'6. 00 ._--.. _ .. _ .. _ .... _-_._------------_. --_. IfAmR LlRB EllSBIIBII'J.' lOR FIRS'r PRBSBY'l'BRIAH a1URCB 01' RBII'l'OH 'lUte1 Property DaBGriptian, That po:tion of the Northeast ~ of the Northweat ~ of Secticn: 29, 'l'OImabip 23 North, RlIDge 5 Baat, If.II •• KinlJ CoIDlt:y, Washington, described aa follows I BegitminlJ at the Southwest ::ome6 of aJaid Northeast ~ of tbP. Northwest ~, thence p 88 12'38· E. a10nIJ the South line of aaid Ror~dt ~ of the Northwest ~ 87.77 fee:: &c! the true point of beqiaDinlJ' theSC8 c:ontinuing R. 88 12'38· E. 250.00 fest, thence R. 1 42'40· E. 749.65 feetl theDce R. 88 17'20· W. 191.67 teet to i:he Eaaterly line of the lleDaan Road (State Road RD. 5CI, thence Southerly a10Dq aaid Baster1y line on e curve to the ri9ht with a radius of 1462.69 feet e distanae of 487.42 feet, thence continuing a10nIJ aai4 Basterly line on a curve to left with a radius of 447.68 feet. a distaDee of 285.95 feet to the true point of beqinDinq. containiDq four aczes iiDre or leaa. E_t Description. An _.-at 15 feet in "idth lying 7.5' on each aide of the follovinlJ described centerline, Ba9inninIJ at a point on tloe South line of an exist! "'1 _ter 11ne eaa8lllent as Eecordet! under Auclltor'a file RD. 5482862. ~r4a of King County, said point 1yin9 441.70 fe .. t III. 1 42'40· B. of the Southeast cozuer of the property 4eacribe4 in the for"''IJOinlJ I thence due West a1nng South line of said eaa_nt 1a.00 feet to the '1'rUa Point of BeqinDing, thellce S. 1 12'40. W. 78.00 feet to the tendnua of said centerline of 15 foot __ to .,,-, a-f;7b [) .L __ I '-- Tbts u.-t ..... n lie I coVtllllnt rumtlnD with the land Ind ,hln lie blndfng 11'1 tile Cruto ... lib I&lCCelsor;. llefrs IIId I"'ps. Grantors cowenant tllet ~ .... the l~vl _rs of tile ..... propertllS Ind that tbel hi". I flOOd Ind lMUl rt~.~ :CUte till' ~t. ~.~~·,.~_~ .. :~,~~~~4~ft~· __ ~IIId ____________ __ ___ "~~~/_"~'_'_~~~ ________________ ~and __________________________ __ __ ~·.:~:~~~~~:~~~~.~~·l_· ______________ -J~ __________________________ __ ' .. '~.~ ..... ~~ --~:=!~.,'~.~~}~;--~.------------------~~ ~.PO!IAR FO!!!: STAR Of d.""!;,,,.; aum Of t(#I" 55 l1li thts 9'1-_ of R~;I • 1111 llefo ... _. tile ... clerstgned. I IIobI'7 Pubtte tn iii4!or tile Stili of f~' clul" _tsslCIIIH ~ _rn persOllI11, IJIPftt'lld III, #-4~ to _ .... to lie till and • respectlvel". of riW" tile COl'POl'lttCIII tJiit _utod tile fore- go III IIIt~t. _ ~ fll.t~t to be t1 .. free IIId "t ... te.,. let and deed of IIld COfPOI'ItIOll. for tile uses IIId purpoIIII therelll _tloned, pd DII OItII steted tIIIt .. IIItJaorlzed to llIIICUte the •• Id In-.~t 1IIe! that tile suI .fff ... I. till corporate .ul of Sltd corponttllll. III'RIESS ... IIIIId IIId offlci.l ... 1 hereto affixed the dq Illd ".. .. III tilts centffcate Iboft llrittell. IIEIZ-Z II J • FIled for Record at the request of SOOS CREEK. WATER AND SBWERDlSTRICf 14616 SE 192nd St POBoxS8039 Renton, Wasbmgton 98058-1039 Documeot Tlde(s): WATER SPECIAL CONNECITON CHARGE #123 Reference Number(s) ofDocument& asmgned or released N/A .< AddItional reference nUJIlbem on page _ of document(s) Grantor(s) N/A AddItional names on page _of docmnent Gnmtee(s) SOOS CREEK WATBRAND SEWERDISTRICf AddItional names on page _ of document Legal Descnptlon See Exlubrt A AddItional legalIS on page _1_ of document Assessor's Property Tax ParceVAccount Number(s): NI A 20031013000893.001 SOOS CREEK WATER &: SEWER DISTRICT I. Clement Ouanrud • SecreIBry of the Board ofCommissioncrs of the attacbed copy of Resolution No. :lJ-1"'f1-vV is a true &lid correct copy of the DATEDtbis ~ dateOf8M§U..s+-.2003. CLEMENT QUANRUD. SECRETARY BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS SOOS CREEK WATER &. SEWER DISTRICl' C~-_dDc 20031013000893.002 BOOS CREEK WATER AND SEWER DISTRICT KING COUNlY, WASHINGTON RESOWTlON NO. 2497.JN A RESOLUTlON of the Board of CommISSioners of Soos Creek Water and Sewer Dlstnct, King County, Washington, establishing Water Speasl Connecbon Charge #123 due Soos Creek Water and Sewer Dlstnct for Contract 8-2002W 20031013000893.003 WHEREAS. water mams and faCi11bes have heretofore been Installed as part of the Project commonly known as Contract 8-2002W, and WHEREAS, said waterfaClbtles Will pl"OVlCle benefrts and sennces to the properbas desa1bed In Extublt "A" attached hereto, whICh IS made a part hereof by thiS reference thereto, and WHEREAS, It IS the poliCY ofSoos Creek Water and Sewer Dtstnct to requn I1II!IIbI.nemen for any faCIbbes built by the DIstnct and/or by an mdIVlduat when S8Id faClhbes pnMde benefit and seMCe to other properties, and WHEREAS, the Dlstnct engineer has datermmed the properties benefited and computed the value of said benefit as applied to S8Jd properties, and WHEREAS, the Board of CommISSIOners finds SaId benefits and the cost thereof to be reasonable, and the SpecIal Connecbon Charge Rate based thereupon to be a fair aIIocabori of such benefits and· costs, NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of CommISSIOfIeI'S of Soos Creek Water and Sewer D&stnc:t as foUows SEC110N 1: That Water Special Connecbon Charge No 12318 hereby established for the propertaes and m the amounts shown m ExhIbit "N, whICh IS mcorporated herem by thIS reference' Said rate does not mclude cost of connecbng, stub sernce, perrmts or InspecbOns, general facdllles charges, or other latecOmers that may be due on the propertIeS RESOLUTION NO. 2AW.JN SUBJECT: Establishing Water SpecIal Connection Charge #123 Due SCWSD PertaIning to Contract 8-2002W PAGE-1 • 2003101300089S.004 SECTION 2: That no service shall be provided to any of the property descnbed In Extllblt "AD pner to payment to the OIstnct of the above astabhslled charges for all property held by the apphcant which has WIthin the area descnbed In ExhIbit "A" SECTION 3: That a Notice of the adopbon of thIS Resolubon as SpeaaI Connecbon Charge shall be recorded with the KIng County DMsJon of Records and Elections ADOPTED by the Board of CommISsIOnerS of Soos Creek Water and Sewer 0IStnct, KIng RESOLUTION NO. 2497-W SUBJECT: Establtshmg Water Spectal Connecbon Charge #123 Due SCWSD Pertaining to Contract 8-2002W PAGE-2 ,. Exhl.bit A SOOS CREEK WATER AND SEWER DISTRICT SPECIAL CONNECnoN CHARGE NO. 123 CONTRACT 8-2002W Base Maps B-2 and B-3 The follOWing properties haw been benefited by the installation of new water mmns and/or water service connections after acceptance of Contract No. 8--2OO2W. 20031013000893.006 The Southerly 150 feet of Lot 1 of Renton Short Plat 70-8 as recorded under recording number 8107299002 1ft KIng County, Washington; said Short Plat Des In the Northeast quarter of the Northwest quarter of SecIIon 29, Township 2S North, Range 5 East, W.M.; In KIng County Washington; AND The SoutharIy·,50 feet of the Easterly 180 feet of the foIIowJng paroeI: That portion of the Northeast quarter of the Northwest quarter of SecIIon 29, Township 23 Nolth, Range 5 East, W.M., KIng County, Washington, described as follows: Begmmng In the Southwest comer of said Northeast quarter of the NorIhwast quarter; thence North .'2'38" East along the South One of said Northeast quarter of !he Northwest quarter ffT. n feet to the true P0lrst of beginning; thence continuing North "'2'38" East 250.00 feet; thence North 011142'40" East 749.65 feel; thence North 88117'20" West 191.~ feet to the Easterly IDle of the Benson Road (State Road No. 5C); thence Southerly along satd Easterly One on a curve to the right with a JBdtus of 1482.89 feet B distance of 487.42 feet; thence conUnuing along said Easterly Ime on B curve to left WIth 8 radius of 447.68 feet, a distance of 285.95 feet to the true point of beglnrung, contaJmng four acres more or less; AND Lots 1 through 13 incIusIv8 of the Plat of OlympIc View Terrace as recorded In Volume 64 of plats, page 69, records of Kmg County, Washmgton; AND Lots 1 through 6 If'IOIusIve of B10,* 1 and lois 1 through 5 Inclusive of Block 2 In the Plat of HUItop Heights as recorded In Volume 75 of plats, pages 79 and 50, records of KIng County, Washington, AND Lot 5, Block 1 of the Plat of Akers Farms No.5 as recorded In Volume 40 of plats, page 27, records of King County, Wastungton; AND The Northerly 150 feet of Lot " Block 8 and of the west 90 feet of Lot 2, Block Bin the Plat of Akers Fanns No.6 as recorded In Volume 42 of plats. page 15. records of King County, Washington. SPECIAL CONNECTION CHARGE RATE: $44.26 PER FRONT FOOT SPECIAL CONNECTION CHARGE RATE: $779.76 PER SERVICE • • I. .tr.I\SCC123&A doC • .,~ fill •• 20031013000893.006 seas CREEK WATER AND SEWER DISTRICT SPECIAL CONNECTION CHARGE NO. 123 CONTRACT 8-2OO2W Base Maps B-2 and B-3 ~ Q!i EBQM TO 8" s.27"'St. Benson Ad. 1 08111 Ave. S.E. 4D S.2B"St. 106'" PI. SE 105 ft +1-West of 1DB" Ave. S.E. B" S.2B"'Sl 105 ft +1-west of 108111 Ave. S.E. 1 oW" Ave. S.E. B" s29'" St. Benson Rd. 109'" Ave. S.E. F \1210141031SCC123ExB <lac Printed: 08-26-2005 Payment Made: ecITY OF RENTON 1055 S. Grady Way Renton, WA 98055 Land Use Actions RECEIPT Permit#: LUA05-106 08/26/200504:16 PM • Receipt Number: Total Payment: 200.00 Payee: MADELINE W.CHANEY Current Payment Made to the Following Items: Trans Account Code Description Amount 5010 000.345.81.00.0007 Environmental Review 200.00 Payments made for this receipt Trans Method Description Amount Payment Check 1666 200.00 Account Balances Trans Account Code Description Balance Due 3021 393.000.00.345.85 Park Mitigation Fee 5006 000.345.81.00.0002 Annexation Fees 5007 000.345.81.00.0003 Appeals/Waivers 5008 000.345.81.00.0004 Binding Site/Short Plat 5009 000.345.81.00.0006 Conditional Use Fees 5010 000.345.81.00.0007 Environmental Review 5011 000.345.81.00.0008 Prelim/Tentative Plat 5012 000.345.81.00.0009 Final Plat 5013 000.345.81. 00.0010 PUD 5014 000.345.81.00.0011 Grading & Filling Fees 5015 000.345.81.00.0012 Lot Line Adjustment 5016 000.345.81.00.0013 Mobile Home Parks 5017 000.345.81.00.0014 Rezone 5018 000.345.81.00.0015 Routine Vegetation Mgmt 5019 000.345.81.00.0016 Shoreline Subst Dev 5020 000.345.81.00.0017 Site Plan Approval 5021 000.345.81.00.0018 Temp Use or Fence Review 5022 000.345.81.00.0019 Variance Fees 5024 000.345.81.00.0024 Conditional Approval Fee 5036 000.345.81.00.0005 Comprehensive Plan Amend 5909 000.341.60. OOc. 0024 Booklets/EIS/Copies 5941 000.341.50.00.0000 Maps (Taxable) 5954 604.237.00.00.0000 Special Deposits 5955 000.05.519.90.42~1 Postage 5998 000.231.70.00.0000 Tax Remaining Balance Due: $0.00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 R0504708 GENERAL NOTES: 1. DRAWINGS ARE NOT TO BE SCALED, WRIITEN DIMENSIONS TAKE PRECEDENCE, THIS SET OF DOCUMENTS IS INTENDED TO BE USED FOR DIAGRAMMATIC PURPOSED ONLY, UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE. THE GENERAL CONTRACTOR'S SCOPE OF WORK SHALL INCLUDE FURNISHING ALL MATERIALS, EQUIPMENT, LABOR AND ANY REQUIREMENTS DEEMED NECESSARY TO COMPLETE INSTALLATION AS DESCRIBED IN THE DRAWINGS AND OWNER'S PROJECT MANUAL. 2. THE CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR ALL DIMENSIONS AND STANDARDIZED DETAILS THAT REQUIRE MODIFICATIONS DUE TO ACTUAL FIELD CONDITIONS AND REQUIREMENTS MUST BE SUBMIITED TO AND APPROVED BY, VOICESTREAM WIRELESS REPRESENTATIVE PRIOR TO START OF WORK. 3. PRIOR TO THE SUBMISSION OF BIDS, CONTRACTORS INVOLVED SHALL VISIT THE JOB SITE TO FAMILIARIZE THEMSELVES WITH ALL CONDITIONS AFFECTING THE PROPOSED PROJECT. CONTRACTORS SHALL VISIT THE CONSTRUCTION SITE WITH THE CONSTRUCTION/CONTRACT DOCUMENTS TO VERIFY FIELD CONDITIONS AND CONFIRM THAT THE PROJECT WILL BE ACCOMPLISHED AS SHOWN. PRIOR TO PROCEEDING WITH CONSTRUCTION, ANY ERRORS, OMISSIONS, OR DISCREPANCIES SHALL BE BROUGHT TO THE AITENTION OF THE ARCHITECT/ENGINEER VERBALLY AND IN WRITING. 4. THE GENERAL CONTRACTOR SHALL RECEIVE WRIITEN AUTHORIZATION TO PROCEED WITH CONSTRUCTION PRIOR TO STARTING WORK ON ANY ITEM NOT CLEARLY DEFINED BY THE CONSTRUCTION DRAWINGS/CONTRACT DOCUMENTS. 5. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL SUPERVISE AND DIRECT THE PROJECT DESCRIBED IN THE CONTRACT DOCUMENTS THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE SOLELY RESPONSIBLE FOR ALL CONSTRUCTION MEANS, METHODS, TECHNIQUES, SEQUENCES, SAFETY, AND PROCEDURES FOR COORDINATING ALL PORTIONS OF THE WORK UNDER THE CONTRACT. 6. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL INSTALL ALL EQUIPMENT AND MATERIALS ACCORDING TO MANUFACTURER'SNENDOR'S SPECIFICATIONS UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE OR WHERE LOCAL CODES OR ORDINANCES TAKE PRECEDENCE. 7. ALL WORK PERFORMED ON THE PROJECT AND MATERIALS INSTALLED SHALL BE IN STRICT ACCORDANCE WITH ALL APPLICABLE CODES, REGULATIONS, AND ORDINANCES. CONTRACTOR SHALL GIVE ALL NOTICES AND COMPLY WITH ALL LAWS, ORDINANCES, RULES, REGULATIONS AND LAWFUL ORDERS OF ANY PUBLIC AUTHORITY, MUNICIPAL AND UTILITY COMPANY SPECIFICATIONS, AND LOCAL AND STATE JURISDICTIONAL CODES BEARING ON THE PERFORMANCE OF THE WORK. 8. GENERAL CONTRACTOR SHALL PROVIDE, AT THE PROJECT SITE, A FULL SET OF CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTS UPDATED WITH THE LATEST REVISIONS INVOLVED WITH THE PROJECT. THIS SET IS A VALID CONTRACT DOCUMENT ONLY IF THE TITLE SHEET IS STAMPED IN RED INK "FOR CONSTRUCTION" AND EACH SUCCESSIVE SHEET BEARS THE ARCHITECT'S/ENGINEER'S SIGNED WET STAMP. 9. THE CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR ADEQUATELY BRACING AND PROTECTING ALL WORK DURING CONSTRUCTION AGAINST DAMAGE, BREAKAGE, COLLAPSE, ETC. ACCORDING TO APPLICABLE CODES, STANDARDS, AND GOOD CONSTRUCTION PRACTICES. 10. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL MEET ALL OSHA REQUIREMENTS FOR ALL INSTALLATIONS. 11. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR ALL DAMAGES TO THE EXISTING CONSTRUCTION AND REPAIR ALL DAMAGES TO BEITER THAN NEW CONSTRUCTION. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL NOTIFY THE CONSULTANT OF ANY DAMAGE TO THE BUILDING SITE OR ANY ADJACENT STRUCTURES AROUND THE PROJECT. THE T-MOBILE REPRESENTATIVE SHALL BE SOLE AND FINAL JUDGE AS TO THE QUALITY OF THE REPAIRED CONSTRUCTION. ANY ADDITIONAL MODIFICATIONS WHICH MUST BE MADE SHALL BE MADE AT THE CONTRACTOR'S EXPENSE. 12. WHERE NEW PAVING, CONCRETE SIDEWALKS OR PATHS MEET EXISTING CONSTRUCTION, THE CONTRACTOR SHALL MATCH THE EXISTING PITCH, GRADE, AND ELEVATION SO THE ENTIRE STRUCTURE SHALL HAVE A SMOOTH TRANSITION. 13. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL MODIFY THE EXISTING FLOORS, WALL, CEILING, OR OTHER CONSTRUCTION AS REQUIRED TO GAIN ACCESS TO AREAS FOR ALL MECHANICAL, PLUMBING, ELECTRICAL, OR STRUCTURAL MODIFICATIONS WHERE THE EXISTING CONSTRUCTION DOORS, PARTITIONS, CEILING, ETC., ARE TO BE REMOVED, MODIFIED, OR REARRANGED OR WHERE THE EXPOSED OR HIDDEN MECHANICAL, ELECTRICAL, SYSTEMS ARE ADDED OR MODIFIED, THE GENERAL CONTRACTOR SHALL REPAIR, PATCH AND MATCH ALL EXISTING CONSTRUCTION AND FINISHES OF ALL FLOORS WALLS AND CEILINGS WHERE CONCRETE MASONRY CONSTRUCTION IS MODIFIED, THE CONTRACTOR SHALL TOOTH IN ALL NEW CONSTRUCTION TO MATCH THE EXISTING BOND. WHERE CONCRETE CONSTRUCTION IS MODIFIED, THE CONTRACTOR SHALL VERIFY THE EXACT DETAILS TO BE USED FOR CONSTRUCTION. ALL WORK SHALL BE COVERED UNDER THE GENERAL CONTRACT. 14. IF CONTRACTOR OR SUBCONTRACTOR FIND IT NECESSARY TO DEVIATE FROM ORIGINAL APPROVED PLANS, THEN IT IS THE CONTRACTOR'S AND THE SUBCONTRACTOR'S RESPONSIBILITY TO PROVIDE THE CONSULTANT WITH 4 COPIES OF THE PROPOSED CHANGES FOR HIS APPROVAL BEFORE PROCEEDING WITH THE WORK. IN ADDITION THE CONTRACTOR AND SUBCONTRACTORS SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR PROCURING ALL NECESSARY APPROVALS FROM THE BUILDING AUTHORITIES FOR THE PROPOSED CHANGES BEFORE PROCEEDING WITH THE WORK. THE CONTRACTOR AND SUBCONTRACTORS SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR PROCURING ALL NECESSARY INSPECTIONS AND APPROVALS FROM BUILDING AUTHORITIES DURING THE EXECUTION OF THE WORK. 15. CONTRACTOR TO PROVIDE A PORTABLE FIRE EXTINGUISHER WITH A RATING OF NOT LESS THAN 2-A OR 2-A10BC WITHIN 75 FEET TRAVEL DISTANCE TO ALL PORTIONS OF PROJECT AREA DURING CONSTRUCTION. 16. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL PERFORM WORK DURING OWNER'S PREFERRED HOURS TO AVOID DISTURBING NORMAL BUSINESS 17. SEAL ALL PENETRATIONS THROUGH FIRE-RATED AREAS WITH U.L. LISTED OR FIRE MARSHAL APPROVED MATERIALS AS APPLICABLE TO THIS FACILITY AND OR PROJECT SITE. 18. CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR UTILITY LOCATES, SCHEDULING, COORDINATING SPECIAL AND BUILDING DEPARTMENT INSPECTIONS. 19. CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR CONTACTING AND UTILIZING ORIGINAL ROOFING CONTRACTOR AS REQUIRED TO MAINTAIN ANY EXISTING ROOFING WARRANTY 20. ROUTING OF ALL CONDUITS, CABLES, CABLE TRAYS ETC ARE INDICATED AS PROPOSED LOCATION ONLY. CONFIRM THE EXACT LOCATION AND ROUTING WITH THE ON SITE T-MOBILE CONSTRUCTION MANAGER PRIOR TO STARTING WORK. CONCRETE NOTES: 1. ALL CONCRETE WORK SHALL BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE ACI 301, ACI318 AND THE SPECIFICATION CAST-IN-PLACE CONCRETE. 2. ALL CONCRETE SHALL HAVE A MINIMUM COMPRESSIVE STRENGTH OF 2500 PSI AT 28 DAYS UNO. 3. REINFORCING STEEL SHALL CONFORM TO ASTM A 615, GRADE 60, DEFORMED UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE. WELDED WIRE FABRIC SHALL CONFORM TO ASTM A 185 WELDED STEEL WIRE FABRIC UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE. SPLICES CLASS "B" AND ALL HOOKS SHALL BE STANDARD UNO. 4. THE FOLLOWING MINIMUM CONCRETE COVER SHALL BE PROVIDED FOR REINFORCING STEEL UNLESS SHOWN OTHERWISE ON DRAWINGS: CONCRETE CAST AGAINST EARTH -3 IN. CONCRETE EXPOSED TO EARTH OR WEATHER: #6 AND LARGER .......................... 2 IN. #5 AND SMALLER & WWF ......... 11/2 IN. 5. A 1/2" TROWELED RADIUS SHALL BE PROVIDED AT ALL EXPOSED EDGES OF CONCRETE UNO. HOLES TO RECEIVE EXPANSIONIWEDGE ANCHORS SHALL BE 1/8" LARGER IN DIAMETER THAN THE ANCHOR BOLT, DOWEL OR ROD AND SHALL CONFORM TO MFR RECOMMENDATION FOR EMBEDMENT DEPTH OR AS SHOWN ON THE DRAWINGS. AVOID CUITING EXISTING REBAR WHEN DRILLING HOLES IN THE ELEVATED SLAB. 6. INSTALLATION OF CONCRETE EXPANSIONIWEDGE ANCHOR, SHALL BE PER MANUFACTURER'S WRIITEN RECOMMENDED PROCEDURES. 7. FLOAT SURFACE SHALL BE A SMOOTH FINISH. SURFACE SHALL BE FREE OF ALL OBVIOUS DEPRESSIONS. SURFACE SHALL BE SLOPED AT 2% TO PROMOTE DRAINAGE AWAY FROM EQUIPMENT. SITE WORK NOTES: 1. RUBBISH, STUMPS, DEBRIS, STICKS, STONES AND OTHER REFUSE SHALL BE REMOVED FROM THE SITE AND DISPOSED OF LEGALLY. 2. THE SITE SHALL BE GRADED TO CAUSE SURFACE WATER TO FLOW AWAY FROM THE PCS EQUIPMENT, TOWER AREAS, AND ADJACENT BUILDINGS. 3. NO FILL OR EMBANKMENT MATERIAL SHALL BE PLACED ON FROZEN GROUND FROZEN MATERIALS, SNOW OR ICE SHALL NOT BE PLACED IN ANY FILL OR EMBANKMENT. 4. THE SUBGRADE SHALL BE COMPACTED AND BROUGHT TO A SMOOTH UNIFORM GRADE PRIOR TO THE CRUSHED STONE APPLICATION. 5. ALL EXISTING ACTIVE SEWER, WATER, GAS, ELECTRIC, AND OTHER UTILITIES WHERE ENCOUNTERED IN THE WORK, SHALL BE PROTECTED AT ALL TIMES, AND WHERE REQUIRED FOR THE PROPER EXECUTION OF THE WORK, SHALL BE RELOCATED AS DIRECTED BY ENGINEERS. EXTREME CAUTION SHOULD BE USED BY THE CONTRACTOR WHEN EXCAVATING OR PIER DRILLING AROUND OR NEAR UTILITIES. CONTRACTOR SHALL PROVIDE SAFETY TRAINING FOR THE WORKING CREW. 6. ALL EXISTING INACTIVE SEWER, WATER, GAS, ELECTRIC AND OTHER UTILITIES, WHICH INTERFERE WITH THE EXECUTION OF THE WORK, SHALL BE REMOVED AND SHALL BE CAPPED, PLUGGED OR OTHERWISE DISCONTINUED AT POINTS WHICH WILL NOT INTERFERE WITH THE EXECUTION OF THE WORK, SUBJECT TO THE APPROVAL OF ENGINEERING. 7. THE AREAS OF THE CUSTOMER'S PROPERTY DISTURBED BY THE WORK AND NOT COVERED BY THE BUILDING, DRIVEWAY OR CRUSHED STONE, SHALL BE GRADED TO A UNIFORM SLOPE, FERTILIZED, SEEDED, AND COVERED WITH MULCH AS SPECIFIED IN THE SPECIFICATION LANDSCAPE WORK. 8. BEDDING MATERIAL FOR UTILITY LINES, CULVERTS AND PIPING: CLEAN SAND, MEDIUM TP COARSE, SUB ROUNDED NATURAL RIVER OR BANK SAND, WASHED, FREE OF SILT OR CLAY, LOAM, FRIABLE OR SOLUBLE MATERIALS, AND ORGANIC MATER; GRADED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING GRAIN SIZE DISTRIBUTION: SIEVE SIZE PERCENT PASSING 3/8" 100 NO. 4 MESH 60-90 NO. 8 MESH 0-45 NO. 16 MESH 0-25 NO. 100 MESH 0-2 NO. 200 MESH 0-2 9. BMP'S FOR TEMPORARY EROSION/SEDIMENTATION CONTROL SHALL BE IMPLEMENTED PER LOCAL, CITY OR COUNTY GUIDELINES AND PER PLAN IF APPLICABLE. ABBREVIATIONS AC AFF AFG AFS ALUM AB L ARCH BTS BLDG BM BOT B.O. BOC BOS CJ Ii! CLG CLR CMU COL CONC CONST CONT CTR DIA/0 DTL (E) EA EJ ELEC EL EQ EW EXP EXT FD FIN FIN FLR FLR FTG GA GALV GYP GB HM HOR HR HT HVAC INSUL INT AIR CONDITIONER ABOVE FINISHED FLOOR ABOVE FINISHED GRADE ABOVE FINISHED SLAB ALUMINUM ANCHOR BOLT ANGLE ARCHITECTURAL BASE TRANSMISSION SYSTEM BUILDING BEAM BOITOM BOITOMOF BOITOM OF CONCRETE BOITOM OF STEEL CONTROL JOINT CENTER LINE CEILING CLEAR CONCRETE MASONRY UNIT COLUMN CONCRETE CONSTRUCTION CONTINUOUS CENTER DIAMETER DETAIL EXISTING EACH EXPANSION JOINT ELECTRIC/ELECTRICAL ELEVATION EQUAL EACH WAY EXPANSION EXTERIOR FLOOR DRAIN FINISH FINISH FLOOR FLOOR FOOTING GAUGE GALVANIZED GYPSUM GYPSUM BOARD HOLLOW METAL HORIZONTAL HOUR HEIGHT HEATING VENTILATION AIR CONDITIONING INSULATION INTERIOR JT LAM LF MANUF MAX MECH MH MM MIN MISC MPH MTL NIC NOM NTS OC OD OH OPNG OPP (P) PCS It PR PSI PSF PT RAD RD REINF REQ'D RM RIW SCHED SECT SF SIM SQFT SS STD STL STRUC TEMP THK T.O. TOS TOC TYP UNO VCT VERT W/ WWM JOINT LAMINATED LINEAL FOOT MANUFACTURER MAXIMUM MECHANICAL MANHOLE MILLIMETER MINIMUM MISCELLANEOUS MILES PER HOUR METAL NOT IN CONTRACT NOMINAL NOT TO SCALE ON CENTER OUTSIDE DIAMETER OVERHEAD OPENING OPPOSITE PROPOSED PERSONAL COMMUNICATION SYSTEM PLATE PAIR POUNDS PER SQUARE INCH POUNDS PER SQUARE FOOT PRESSURE TREATED RAOIUS ROOF DRAIN REINFORCEO/REINFORCING REQUIRED ROOM RIGHT OF WAY SCHEDULE SECTION SQUARE FOOT SIMILAR SQUARE FOOT ST AI N LESS STEEL STANDARD STEEL STRUCTURAL TEMPORARY THICK TOP OF TOP OF STEEL TOP OF CONCRETE TYPICAL UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE VINYL COMPOSITION TILE VERTICAL WITH WELDED WIRE MESH LEGENDS & SYMBOLS CHAINLINK FENCE -X CEDAR FENCE -0 POWER --P TELCO --T POWERrrELCO --T/P OVERHEAD COAX --OHC COAX --COAX OVERHEAD POWER OH CENTERLINE REVISION BUG ELEVATION VIEW BUG ELEVATION DETAIL BUG SECTION BUG X X X 0 0 P ----P----P T ----T----T T/P ---T/P T/P OHC ---OHC---OHC COAX .---COAX---COAX OH ----OH----OH DETAIL NUMBER SHEET NUMBER 0TOPOF '" EL 0'-0" E@~-_t=tl === DETAIL NUMBER ~ SHEET NUMBER DETAIL NUMBER SHEET NUMBER --lbIceJ?!JMqJ" 19807 NORTHCREEK PKWY N BOTHELL, WA 98011 OFFICE (425) 398·7600 = PROJECT INFORMATION: BENSON RD/CHURCH MP SE4663F 2640 BENSON RD RENTON, WA 98055 '-ISSUED FOR: [I BUILDING PERMIT II ;-REVISION HISTORY: No. DATE: DESCRIPTION: CHI(. APPV. BY: BY: - ----.---_~i. ~ 8/11/2005 REV. PER PRE-APP BJT ME MEETING A --- 8/2/2005 ISSUED FOR BPS BJT MP _. --&1 7/21/2005 ISSUED DESIGN REVIEW BJT ME I :::: PLANS PREPARED BY: B. J. THOMAS, P.E. 7607 80TH AVE NE MARYSVILLE, WA 98270 206·851·1106 -DRAWN BY: [I AAL CHI(. BY: = APPV. BY:- BJT AM LICENSURE: [EXPIRES 08/25/07 EQUIPMENT: VOICESTREAM WIRELESS ANTENNAS LOCATED ON A59'-11" AGL POLE WITH BTS EQUIPMENT IN AN EQUIPMENT SHELTER NEAR THE BASE OF THE MONOPOLE ;-DRAWING INFORMATION: ============::::: DO NOT SCALE DRAWINGS. CONTRACTOR MUST VERIFY ALL DIMENSIONS AND ADVISE CONSULTANTS OF ANY ERRORS AND OMISSIONS. ALL PREVIOUS ISSUES OF THIS DRAWING ARE SUPERSEDED BY THE LATEST REVISION. THE INFORMATION CONTAINED IN THIS SET OF DOCUMENTS IS PROPRIETARY BY NATURE. ANY USE OR DISCLOSURE OTHER THAN WHICH IS RELATED TO NAMED CLIENT IS STRICTLY PROHIBITED. '-DRAWING TITLE: ==================::::: GENERAL NOTES DRAWING NUMBER: G·1 VICINITY MAP NOT TO SCALE ------ PARCEL NUMBER: 2923059102 LEGAL DESCRIPTION: PER ASSESSOR RECORDS: BEG SW COR OF NE 1/4 OF NW 114 TH N 88~12~38 E 87.77 FT TO POB TH N 88~12~38 E 250 FTTH N 01~42~40 E 749.65 FTTH 191.67 FTTO ELY LN OF BENSON RD TH SLY ALG SD ELY LN 773.37 FT TO POB LESS CIM RGTS LESS CO RD MULTI FAMILY RESIDENTIAL ----- SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL I, , , , ~ ------- FOUND MONUMENT ICOPPERPIN INCASE, DOWN 0.5' S26iHSi 154'-1" I I /i I I / ; I I I I \' \--', -- \ ... ~"/.'.' .. /.' I I '-- I -, ---i /' I I I ' I , =/ ~ ~, "'I crl I I J.-I ;;1"- '" C) " MULTI FAMILY RESIDENTIAL S88'16'18"E ----- 19036' , / I , / , I / ~ m a:i ,r::: ~ ">1'-----100' -----j<.. o (/) AS~ALT !itn ,! f ;~~' ",1. 'APN #2923059102 ti' -T I J;' I ~/~&' J I I , I -.' --r-:>90 ----_. I 396 ' __ 400 .'-- , . , ;> --" _. __ .c¢lblCflE:rE.:; f\r~ l(] . , .. L .\ 136'~ 1 0" FROM " CORNER TO FIRE HYDRANT .i~~~ .;'" qlllQ. '",. . ~? r SETliUB ' -(TYPj---. -: CWMP Of tMPLES TRUI)/K6O" . 63.4 • Mf>40 , .... > 76.4 "''' 0'" Mel 40.4' , BUILDING 260.70' S88'13'40"W S27THST I '(j>~ # ··f -/~.L'" I ---J :~ I --:-----~ -._\ J I __ J SCHOOL PROPERTY (E) PARKING LOT (P) 34'~10" x 11'~0" VOICESTREAM SHELTER (SEE SHT. A-3 FOR SHELTER DETAILS) (P) 60' AGL STEEL MONOPOLE 24"0 (P) 4" UfG PVC POWER ROUTING 120 LF. ± & (P) 3" UIG PVC TELCO ROUTING 120 L.F. ± (E) UTILITY POLE (POWER & TELCO SERVICE SOURCE) (E) OIH UTILITY OVERALL SITE PLAN 22x34 SCALE: 1" ~ 40' 11x17 SCALE: 1" ~ 80' 40' I ----20' 40' 80' I --~--------~-~~--' ------- --WceSgR~IJJ· 19807 NORTHCREEK PKWY N BOTHELL, WA 98011 OFFICE (425) 398·7600 ~ PROJECT INFORMATION: BENSON RD/CHURCH MP SE4663F 2640 BENSON RD RENTON, WA 98055 '-ISSUED FOR: [I BUILDING PERMIT r REVISION HISTORY: No. DATE: DESCRIPTION: CHK. APPV. BY: BY: r-.-i----+--------i----c-----j 1--;\ . ~ 8111/2005 8/2/2005 7/21/2005 REV. PER PRE~APP MEETING ISSUED FOR BPS ISSUED DESIGN REVIEW ~ PLANS PREPARED BY: BJT BJT BJT B. J. THOMAS, P.E. 7607 80TH AVE NE MARYSVILLE, WA 98270 206·851·1106 ME MP ME [I DRAWN :: CHI(. BY, = AOPY. BY, ~ IBJTI AM I LICENSURE: EXPIRES 08/25107 I EQUIPMENT: VOICESTREAM WIRELESS ANTENNAS LOCATED ON A 59'~11" AGL POLE WITH BTS EQUIPMENT IN AN EQUIPMENT SHELTER NEAR THE BASE OF THE MONOPOLE DRAWING INFORMATION: DO NOT SCALE DRAWINGS. CONTRACTOR MUST VERIFY ALL DIMENSIONS AND ADVISE CONSULTANTS OF ANY ERRORS AND OMISSIONS. ALL PREVIOUS ISSUES OF THIS DRAWING ARE SUPERSEDED BY THE LATEST REVISION. THE INFORMATION CONTAINED IN THIS SET OF DOCUMENTS IS PROPRIETARY BY NATURE. ANY USE OR DISCLOSURE OTHER THAN WHICH IS RELATED TO NAMED CLIENT IS STRICTLY PROHIBITED. DRAWING TITLE: SITE PLAN DRAWING NUMBER: A·1 ::0 l> m c:: 0 C") 0 m "" " -:n ;ii 0'> m "> ~ I:) § 0 <.n Z ------ ~ (E) VEGETATION ~ ; - -----, ~(E)GRASS~ ',--< ~(ElCHURCH BUILDING ~ I I . 25'-5" ,- I I (P) LANDSCAPING (SEE SHT. L-1 FOR DETAILS) +-----11' ---------;,j<_ 34'-10" 6- t) --~ i I/> ~~'Jvr I 'f~ I -JJ -----~ ._--- (P) VOICESTREAM BTS EQUIPMENT AREA (E) SHED TO BE REMOVED 20' MIN SETBACK FROM (E) CHURCH BUILDING ('\0 "fr ('\0 "4- ENLARGED SITE PLAN 22x34 SCALE: 1/4" = l' 11x17 SCALE: 1/8" = l' a. a. a. (P) VOICESTREAM SHELTER (SEE SHT. A-3 FOR DETAILS) (P) CHURCH STO~ ! I (P) 7' WIDE SAW CUT (E) CURB & SLOPE NEW CONC RAMP FROM (E) ASPHALT FINISH GRADE TO (P) CONC BUILDING SLAB /'lI'--4' -;-t I I la'7' I, , n-:::~:--,--J , O--·;() (P) 6' WIDE ROLL UP DOOR (MATCH (P) 3' WIDE SHELTER DOOR) (P) 4' WIDE SAW CUT (E) CURB & SLOPE NEW CONC RAMP FROM (E) ASPHALT FINISH GRADE TO (P) CONC BUILDING SLAB 0-- "4-) ~.---- § 1Lll:::i .J --.. ---- ~ (El WALKWAY ~ ~ (E) PARKING LOT ~ (P) 3f4" UfG PVC CONDUIT FOR POWER TO BOX LIGHTS (P) (5) 4" UfG PVC CONDUITS (P) (2) STANDARD BOX LIGHTS (P) 4" UfG PVC POWER ROUTING 120 LF. ± & (P) 3" UfG PVC TELCO ROUTING 120 LF. ± (SEE SHT. A-1 FOR ROUTING) (P) 59'-11" AGL STEEL MONOPOLE 24"0 I j a. I I f- a. WeeSt/Mm" WIRELESS 19807 NORTHCREEK PKWY N BOTHELL, WA 98011 OFFICE (425) 398·7600 = PROJECT INFORMATION: BENSON RD/CHURCH MP SE4663F 2640 BENSON RD RENTON, WA 98055 -ISSUED FOR: [I II BUILDING PERMIT -REVISION HISTORY: No. DATE: DESCRIPTION: CHI(. APPV, BY: BY: I . -------- ----. - I , , ~ 8/11/2005 REV. PER PRE-APP BJT ME MEETING ------.. & 8/2/2005 ISSUED FOR BPS BJT MP --------- b 7/21/2005 ISSUED DESIGN REVIEW BJT ME ;: PLANS PREPARED BY: B. J. THOMAS, P.E. 7607 80TH AVE NE MARYSVILLE, WA 98270 206·851·1106 '-DRAWN BY: [I AAL CHK. BY: = APPV. BY:- BJT AM LICENSURE: -"E=:XP::.:IRE=S'-----__ -"O,8/25107 EQUIPMENT: VOICESTREAM WIRELESS ANTENNAS LOCATED ON A59'-11" AGL POLE WITH BTS EQUIPMENT IN AN EQUIPMENT SHELTER NEAR THE BASE OF THE MONOPOLE DRAWING INFORMATION: ======~ DO NOT SCALE DRAWINGS. CONTRACTOR MUST VERIFY ALL DIMENSIONS AND ADVISE CONSULTANTS OF ANY ERRORS AND OM ISSIONS. ALL PREVIOUS ISSUES OF THIS DRAWING ARE SUPERSEDED BY THE LATEST REVISION. THE INFORMATION CONTAINED IN THIS SET OF DOCUMENTS IS PROPRIETARY BY NATURE. ANY USE OR DISCLOSURE OTHER THAN WHICH IS RELATED TO NAMED CLIENT IS STRICTLY PROHIBITED. DRAWING TITLE: =========~ ENLARGED SITE PLAN DRAWING NUMBER: A-1.1 :0 m o m ~ o PAINT NOTE: RADOME AND POLE SHALL BE PAINTED ANTI-GLARE BROWN STRUCTURAL NOTE: NEW POLE STRUCTURAL DESIGN BY OTHERS. I---:---'---(E) UTILITY POLE I / (E) CHURCH BLDG u $ TOP OF POLE 59'-11" AGL RADOME WI ANTENNAS WITHIN SHIRO'UD------i ~I ~I I, -- I -, _, i- 'II u '" II~ , . r-, , , , , , , I , RADCENTER 57'-6" AGL AZIMUTH 190" RAD CENTER 51'-6" AGL II------PROPOSED GPS ANTENNA L -,_ I ~_± J-__ i~lr~, D t-li---C+-C, (P) (2) BOX L1GHTS@24'AGL II, --', __ ,1- ~'I" '. ';"1 ~:-; " ,''",,' ~ _ I -'-~ _' I 'I L_ _ '--- L --\illl~:" ~-i~;-~ ) -' <~ -: --,! 1.-.'J \;~~"-_ ,,' ~-_ '-I • 'I' -'---- -I" JI __ c-c--_--"c-_-,:::""-"cI,:,:,~~~~:~~.~~~~~~~~:LI',-----_-_-_-_-_-_~~~~:~~:_-_-,-,----~..J ,II ) -1--I, I~ I =-=-r;-: I I -T-,,.--- , " ,I " ---, \ ~-'-'ii , ' -, ", :~_r:_.' , r -,,', ~ . , = '>' i 'I, ----- c.L u L ---:r::::'::-' ! ,.'-[ I', ,. [ . '.' " ", .J ' " 1\ -~-.----,:, _,') I I -.J "-L---. , , " , , 'C ,/ , i , --I I I I ,',I , , . " _:,,-' - -1 --I' ; '-II ---....: :~ , 25'-5" BLDG ~------------~------,---------------~---SETBACK • ----FOUNDATION BY STRUCTURAL ENGINEER EAST ELEVATION 22x34 SCALE: 3/16" = 1 '-0" 11x17 SCALE: 3/32" = 1'-0" ~. . <=-=-' [' I -, I , I:.' , -:, """,1:,' . _, , I: 1.-.--- '-',=-- , ,'. ":1, I -__ ~ ',,'['~ .. -~ I' -.'--.--_-~ __ Iy. \1.\'--:-- '1 __ " " '-..",::, . .1 , -, 1-. ; I' I - - ~ I ,. , ,'" -7 " 'I ,\,-. " _.J 1 -'--, - ?-:-~---. " , I " I <'1, '., , , , '- -11_ -_; I. , -I,-~ , ,~- (P) VOICESTREAM SHELTER (SEE SHT, A-3 FOR ENCLOSURE DETAILS) -',' 'ii, " 'I ~, J' I / ,- 1,-,'--- \ __ ,' Cr :' --~. -I .,-' -,- '-II "-'. ---~-1----·-- -. -1'-: -I' ' , ',-:---: l_ _ .. ' . \'~' I' --- ii",' ---..' '--- II , ! 10'-4" ± ,_' -'II __ C I ,-;: I ! , ' '-< I ' " , . ' II, 1 '- 19807 NORTHCREEK PKWY N BOTHELL, WA 98011 OFFICE (425) 398-7600 ~ PROJECT INFORMATION: BENSON RD/CHURCH MP SE4663F 2640 BENSON RD RENTON, WA 98055 '-ISSUED FOR: [/ BUILDING PERMIT -REVISION HISTORY: No. DATE: DESCRIPTION: CHK.. APPV_ BY: BY: -. - , ____ I i i -. ----r---- ---. . --~ 8/11/2005 REV. PER PRE-APP BJT ME , MEETING ~ 81212005 ISSUED FOR BPS BJT MP ~' - 712112005 ISSUED DESIGN REVIEW BJT ME :::: PLANS PREPARED BY: B. J. THOMAS, P.E. 7607 80TH AVE NE MARYSVILLE, WA 98270 206·851·1106 -DRAWN BY: [I AAL CHI(. BY: = APPV. BY: - BJT AM LICENSURE: I EXPIRES 08125/07 EQUIPMENT: VOICESTREAM WIRELESS ANTENNAS LOCATED ON A 59'-11" AGL POLE WITH BTS EQUIPMENT IN AN EQUIPMENT SHELTER NEAR THE BASE OF THE MONOPOLE DRAWING INFORMATION: DO NOT SCALE DRAWINGS. CONTRACTOR MUST VERIFY ALL DIMENSIONS AND ADVISE CONSULTANTS OF ANY ERRORS AND OMISSIONS. ALL PREVIOUS ISSUES OF THIS DRAWING ARE SUPERSEDED BY THE LATEST REVISION. THE INFORMATION CONTAINED IN THIS SETOF DOCUMENTS IS PROPRIETARY BY NATURE. ANY USE OR DISCLOSURE OTHER THAN WHICH IS RELATED TO NAMED CLIENT IS STRICTLY PROHIBITED. DRAWING TITLE: SITE ELEVATIONS DRAWING NUMBER: A·2 :IJ m o m <: m C () ~ o .." :n m ~ z~ 11 ' ~ 10'-4" GRIIDE LEVEL 1 34'-10" ,~ il'~1 III ,11,1 "I ,,\1 "I ) I,,!, 'I '" t1:"1 ')1 ,iii :\, 11,1 UUUUU 18" MIN. I--f~ ~ 30" MIN. 1 f'" "" f"" 2 • A-3 , i"'" '" ~ 3' 'I .i! "' ",1' I,ll METAL DOOR- I ICJ I =:J DOUBLE 2" x 4" TOP PLATES , [3 I =-- 11111111 11111111 11111111 I II II II I l:Il:Il:Il:I 2" x 4" FRAMING @16"0.C. 2"x4" P.T. BOTTOM PLATE I, , .. " -, : • : J"~. . .' , 0 PURCELL RACK NOKIA NOKIA "'--_. ULTRASITE ULTRASITE , 0 "" /;/16" OSB SHEATING '----" _--.-J L VOICESTREAM SIDE CONTINUOUS FLOOR / TO ROOFLINE "" , 13'-10" £ ""'''''-WO"''''' CLEARANCE FOR WALL MOUNTED "" EQUIPMENT :---:1 -" I I 3' I !1 I '" 3' 'I ----:lr III!: "'~I II'~ i,i,1 ,~I 'i', ~ :;;.! i'! II! 'i I'll I LJ f1\ BTS ENCLOSURE PLAN \!::) SCALE: 1/2" = 1 '-0" --- [3 rr::::=::-J ==:,: . .;' BTS ENCLOSURE INTERIOR ELEVATION SCALE: 1/4" = 1 '-0" ENGINEERED TRUSSES @ 24" O.C. 1/2" CDX PLYWOOD 15 LB FELT 30 YR COMPOSITION SHINGLES CHARCOAL BLACK -'"',-" . .': .. . ~-==-~;--=-;:-~_Co..::-_--'-~.~:,:::: ... < ... ", ,:,",",.... . ~, ~ ~~-~~-~-~~~~>3;~l~::,:,~ .. ~1\:iI; .. :,>;.sI1-. __ I --~ __ ~ . -=-~~~'~ ····.-:?"~;;'/,;m,21:'~-t:fE:·~~··=· ===~==rl ;~~;fl-~~-~--:-~~~ ~0~'~:' _l':~... '~.::--~,,~''".:''--------___l ~_C-.~ __ -~~~;~~_~.~t_::-.~ __ ~;:> .. ·' .....:.:~:~:;:~~--------I -,", , .,~: .\, .. --~,:" ,.r--------l 1 .. ",.;<.':. _ .'. .-=:'cceco."-~-;:~_~-;·" .... : ... : .. ,., .. : .... , ...... ::'-. --------1 -", ~:(:-BX:':-'" "'-, "iSLE! FELT OR:,:S.5/16" x8" HARDIPLANK 0·;i'.?I~~.ic·;:· TYVEX HOUSE.:; PRIMED TEXTURED 7" . ---.. -",' WRAP :.'.-EXPOSURE SIDING - .~c~-;' -.~-.~~-__ ,,:--C =;co,.''>: ::>:<;.>; .. ,:>----------1 "-~,- 'iJ.E"?--:--:-__ -==~~~~~~;o;-~ " . . -.'" ."' 5/8" x 10" ANCHOR BOLTS@4'0.C. MAX. 8" THICK 2500 PSI CONCRETE SLAB W/#4 BARS @ 12" O.C. EACH WAY BTS ENCLOSURE @ ~~N~ING DETAIL ~\ . ,..l', ~ .• -. .':i . . 5/4" x 6" WOOD FACIA 5/4" x 4" WOOD CORNER TRIM ",, !I "I 'I'~i ,,\ 'I!;I I :11 liil "i ,I II,I! " ~l,' IU 1/2" RADIUS (TYPICAL)---, f.,. 8" CONCRETE SLAB #4 @ 12" O.C. EACH WAY -6" MIN ABOVE FINISH GRADE "" ) ~ ,"O'OOOOC",,," ~ "'" 10'-4' ""ACE \ ..,j<----,I""'l3" 11-' -II I J-1-1 ,~~I (2)#4REBARS .' ... 11-1--=-:'11· .! CONTINUOS .. •... =i -. I-!; !: 11-= III """ "" 11--= 1---=11 ,-I II' Cl'-I ~=,=I: 1=1 -1-. 1 =11 =1 . I ' ~I ! 1=1 .. I=III~III_I i :.. :11/1...:.::-' I I-I.· II! 1 1 ... . ,'. !-::-::-II 1-1 UNDISTURBE~ ~.~o~ PSI CONCRETE -12" 12" MIN BELOW FINISH GRADE NATIVE SOIL NO SPECIAL INSPECTIONS REQUIRED 20' 6' 3'-8" ~ @ ~~OTING DETAIL '0 Ii, I',:i 4" x 10" FIR HEADER I,II~ ,j,! I~, -.. ~ (TYP ALL OPENINGS) ~( ~ 4' 'I MASTER FLOW PRO 3 SIGNAGE (SEE DETAIL 4 SHT 5) r _,,"'" "'"' (OR EQUAL) r METER BASE , ~-"--, f---"-r-' I " --- , , , Cl 1 ------ ------- ---- - -------- ------- , - , , , 1;-r~,T __ 1 I '.L [ , , " :' r , ::S==-C' L 1_ I --,-----loT] , -, J-rLL -,--'" , y, -]--I I ! L: ~ ,I 1.·· __ L I --~ I [ ~-__ ! ,-----L __ 1' __ ' :r==-J J __ I --I,~_ _~ , _~ -,---L---:-I I ::::-T:::: -::.--:~ §]--~ ._---~ --~ ~~~f -iOl __ _ • 11--_-----0 ~-GEN. PLUG- BTS ENCLOSURE @ !!S!s ELEVATION )--------,---.. -----I "-6" 1.14---.1<-(TVP.) 6' x 7' ROLL UP DOOR CONTINUOUS ALUMINUM GUTTER (TYP) SIDING TO MATCH (E) STRUCTURE POWER VENT 10'-4" +/- BTS ENCLOSURE @ ~A~:~~H ELEVATION BTS ENCLOSURE @ ~~~!H ELEVATION , II] ,-5---' ,,-L--L--[' : -,_L.r , ], _L::l L_ I J , , I I -_ I -'---I I I ---~ =:I_ , , , _J_ , ~L , ~L_r= , ___ . ____ I , , , , , _ .. - ---- --- ------ - . - - ,- -- -- - --- --- ,-- ... ,-' , ~ t- (2)12" x 18"WOOD LOUVER VENT WISCREEN 12" OFF FLOOR '--, T I I I I i ~~ ,,:, ":=~ ",L ;-_I_...:..:..L~I-__ LI ;~I " ' , ' -~T" I~' I ----, ., , ------- -- ----- -- --- -----, ------------ ------ -~§--~ ---- --------- ------._=--.... -= -"----1 CONVENTIONAL LIGHT FRAMING I ~_~ ___ -'1"-1 ROOF: -30 YR COMPOSITION SHINGLES CHARCOAL BLACK -15 LB. ROOFING FELT -1/2" PLYWOOD SHEATHING -MANUFACTURED ROOF TRUSSES 4/12 PITCH 24" O.C. --10'-4" +/-EXTERIOR WALLS: -5/16" x 8" HARDIPLANK PRIMED TEXTURED SIDING -15 LB. FELT OR TYVEX HOUSE WRAP -1/2" COX PLYWOOD -2"x4" WOOD STUDS AT 16" OIC WI 2" x4" P.T. BOTTOM PLATE AND (2) 2" x4" TOP PLATES ------------------------------------- CONCRETE SLAB 7 (SEE DETAIL 3 SHT. 6) --------------------------------------- BTS ENCLOSURE @ ~~:~~ ELEVATION ~jCeJlt~~' 19807 NORTHCREEK PKWY N BOTHELL, WA 9801 1 OFFICE (425) 398-7600 ::PROJECT INFORMATION: BENSON RD/CHURCH MP SE4663F 2640 BENSON RD RENTON, WA 98055 -ISSUED FOR: [I BUILDING PERMIT _ REVISION HISTORY: DESCRIPTION: CHI<. APPY. No. DATE: BY: BY: I I , ._---- , I I --------------- A ~·8/11/20051 REV. PER PRE-APP 3 . MEETING BJT ME & - -,-.- 8/2/2005 I ISSUED FOR BPS BJT MP ,--&1 7/21/2005 I ISSUED DESIGN REVIEW BJT ME = PLANS PREPARED BY: B. J. THOMAS, P.E. 7607 80TH AVE NE MARYSVILLE, WA 98270 206·851·1106 ~DRAWN BY: [I AAL CHK. BY: = APPV. BY: - BJT AM LICENSURE: ----~~-- EXPIRES 08/25/07 EQUIPMENT: VOICESTREAM WIRELESS ANTENNAS LOCATED ON A 59'-11" AGL POLE WITH BTS EQUIPMENT IN AN EQUIPMENT SHELTER NEAR THE BASE OF THE MONOPOLE DRAWING INFORMATION: DO NOT SCALE DRAWINGS. CONTRACTOR MUST VERIFY ALL DIMENSIONS AND ADVISE CONSULTANTS OF ANY ERRORS AND OMISSIONS ALL PREVIOUS ISSUES OF THIS DRAWING ARE SUPERSEDED BY THE LATEST REVISION. THE INFORMATION CONTAINED IN THIS SET OF DOCUMENTS IS PROPRIETARY BY NATURE. ANY USE OR DISCLOSURE OTHER THAN WHICH IS RELATED TO NAMED CLIENT IS STRICTLY PROHIBITED. DRAWING TITLE: ==================~ ENCLOSURE DETAILS DRAWING NUMBER: A·3 ::a ~ m c::: (") ~ m '" ~ ..., l:r:I 0 Q 0 B ~---------------- AC SERVICE: 200 AMP 120/240 VOLTS AC 1 (2;1 0 0 CB r-RECTIFIER RACK FOOTPRINT -----------------I--r I 1'-0" / / W "'/1 I 0 0 NOKIA ULTRASITE NOKIA ULTRASITE I +--------2'-6" / PURCELL CABINET CABINET / Lt-3" 7 .. ECTIFIER RACK (845lbs) (845lbs) 0 0 I 6'-0" I II \. ~ \. ) I "- ~: r II I I "- I II I I I II ~ II / I 1// I II / I II / ~---// ~---// 2'-7" . _________ -1_-* +---~ ------------._--- 7I'J~------------------10'-9" --------------------,J EQUIPMENT WEIGHT (1) NOKIA UL TRASITE BTS: (1) NOKIA UL TRASITE BTS: (1) RECTIFIER RACK WITH FULL STRING OF BATTERIES: TOTAL EQUIPMENT WEIGHT: EQUIPMENT ISOMETRIC VIEW N.T.S. 0 0 /0 0 ~ NOKIA UL TRASITE PLINTH (TYP.) PROVIDE SHIMS TO LEVEL AS NEEDED t /0 L /1 /1 6" PLINTH ANCHOR 1/2" X 4" REDHEAD SLEEVE ANCHOR (TYP.) 0 0 I • 0 ......... 0 -1k 1/2" -,IL----2'-6" -------J¥*-------2'-6" -----+ PLINTH DETAIL N.T.S. 740 LBS 740 LBS 600 LBS 2080 LBS EQUIPMENT PLAN VIEW N.T.S. 1------ I I I I I I I ;f-1'-0" 1/ / I I I I I I I I i I I I I I I II II 1'-6" , - - \ r REQUIRED SERVICE CLEARANCE ----_.-------I 1/ ~ I I I I I 2'-7" -------7¥-1/ I I -----'------.-- (f) ~~UIPMENT SIDE VIEW lOCeJ?t~«'· 19807 NORTHCREEK PKWY N BOTHELL, WA 98011 OFFICE (425) 398·7800 :: PROJECT INFORMATION: BENSON RD/CHURCH MP SE4663F 2640 BENSON RD RENTON, WA 98055 -ISSUED FOR: [I BUILDING PERM~ r-REVISION HISTORY: CHI<. APPV. No. DATE: DESCRIPTION: BY: BY: , I -----;------ .. "---- , ----- , , ---. -- --- 8 8/11/2005 REV. PER PRE-APP BJT I ME : MEETING -. -"'--_ ... ~' 8/2/2005 ISSUED FOR BPS BJT MP . ---. -. ~ 7/21/2005 ISSUED DESIGN REVIEW BJT i ME ;: PLANS PREPARED BY: B. J. THOMAS, P.E. 7607 80TH AVE HE MARYSVILLE, WA 98270 206·851·1106 .... DRAWN BY: [I AAL CHI<. BY: = APPV. BY: - BJT AM LICENSURE: I EXPIRES 08/25/07 EQUIPMENT: VOICESTREAM WIRELESS ANTENNAS LOCATED ON A 59'-11" AGL POLE WITH BTS EQUIPMENT IN AN EQUIPMENT SHELTER NEAR THE BASE OF THE MONOPOLE DRAWING INFORMATION: ======:::: DO NOT SCALE DRAWINGS. CONTRACTOR MUST VERIFY ALL DIMENSIONS AND ADVISE CONSULTANTS OF ANY ERRORS AND OMISSIONS. ALL PREVIOUS ISSUES OF THIS DRAWING ARE SUPERSEDED BY THE LATEST REVISION THE INFORMATION CONTAINED IN THIS SET OF DOCUMENTS IS PROPRIETARY BY NATURE. ANY USE OR DISCLOSURE OTHER THAN WHICH IS RELATED TO NAMED CLIENT IS STRICTLY PROHIBITED. DRAWING TITLE: BTS EQUIPMENT DETAILS DRAWING NUMBER: A·4 :xJ m (") m -< m c >-c: C') "-' 0"> ......, = = u. z Gl FINISH GRADE OR AC PAVING MATCH SLOPE THICKNESS OF EXISTING r~~·l r ~----------------~ 3ER~=---__ COMPACTED BACKFILL PER UNDISTURBED NATIVE SOIL 24" MIN. " 4" ... " WSDOT 9-03.14(3) COMPACTED TO MIN OF 95% MAX. UNIT WT AS DETERMINED BY ASTM Dl557 UTILITY WARNING TAPE -------DIRECT BURIED 3" PVC ELECTRICAL CONDUIT WI RIGID GALVANNIZED STEEL RISERS 36" RADIUS SWEEPS PIPE ZONE BEDDING PER WSDOT 9-03.12(3) COMPACTED TO MIN. 95% OF MAX UNIT WT AS DETERMINED BY ASTM D1557 @ ~T~ECTRICAL SERVICE TRENCH C IN CASE OF AN EMERGENCy'1 CALL I 1-888-662-4662 I Site No: _...:S:::E:::4::;66::::::3:::F=--__ _ lo Site Name: TEASDALE PARK @ ~I~E SIGNAGE DETAIL 24" MIN. FINISH GRADE OR AC PAVING MATCH SLOPE THICKNESS OF EXISTING UNDISTURBED NATIVE SOIL ---COMPACTED BACKFILL PER WSDOT 9-03.14(3) COMPACTED TO MIN OF 95% MAX. UNITWT AS DETERMINED BY ASTM D1557 UTILITY WARNING TAPE DIRECT BURIED 4" PVC TELEPHONE CONDUIT (2) 6 PAIR DROP. PIPE ZONE BEDDING PER WSDOT 9-03.12(3) COMPACTED TO MIN. 95% OF MAX UNIT WT AS DETERMINED BY ASTM D1557 @ ~~.LCO SERVICE TRENCH ANTENNAS (SEE SHEET RF-2) GAMMA 240" (YELLOW) ) "7iL---2'-0· 0 -----,jL- @ ~~sTENNA LAYOUT ,------FINISH GRADE OR AC PAVING MATCH SLOPE THICKNESS OF EXISTING ,----UNDISTURBED NATIVE SOIL r~~'1 T -=II-r-_. ____ -I i 1-rT""_._ ----;11 ::::=:~:~=~=~:~=~:~;~=:::=:=:-=-I::hl -r=lloirr-- 24" =1 =11 = -::::::::::::::::-:-:::::::::::=111=1 MIN. 1---1! 1--II ~:=:=::::::::::::::~:~:~:::::--::::t~--__ COMPACTED BACKFILL PER ),,1 • = II=-:-:-:-:-:-.;;;-------.;;;-:-:-:-:--=: 11--WSDOT 9-03.14(3) COMPACTED 4" , 1< = __ . __ . I =.___ + + !=I TO MIN UNITWT AS DETERMINED ! _111_ - -BY ASTM D1557 --UTILITY WARNING TAPE =111---,-'II III I I . II 'I II: '-I 1- 61/2" MIN. ----PIPE ZONE BEDDING PER WSDOT 9-03.12(3) COMPACTED TO MIN. 95% OF MAX UNITWT AS DETERMINED BY ASTM D1557 '-------(5) 4"0 PVC COAX CABLE CONDUITS @ ~~AX CABLE TRENCH WceJlt~D!· 19807 NORTHCREEK PKWY N BOTHELL, WA 98011 OFFICE (425) 398·7800 = PROJECT INFORMATION: BENSON RD/CHURCH MP SE4663F 2640 BENSON RD RENTON, WA 98055 -ISSUED FOR: [I BUILDING PERMIT _ REVISION HISTORY: No. DATE: DESCRIPTION: CHK. APPV. BY: BY: f--+-----.-- 1----+----+--_. --------+------- ._. __ ._------_._. /\3 8/11/2005 REV. PER PRE-AP=----+BJT ~ MEETING ~==+---~------- ME MP A 8/2/2005 . ISSUED FOR BPS i BJT ----'-----------j-' ---l-----1 & 7/21/2005 ISSUED DESIGN REVIEW BJT = PLANS PREPARED BY: B. J. THOMAS, P.E. 7607 80TH AVE NE MARYSVILLE, WA 98270 206-851-1106 ME CHK. BY: = APPV. BY: ~ BJT AM II -DRAWN BY: [I AAL LICENSURE: _E=XP=IRE:::::::.S ___ 0::.::8:/25/07 I EQUIPMENT: VOICESTREAM WIRELESS ANTENNAS LOCATED ON A 59'-11" AGL POLE WITH BTS EQUIPMENT IN AN EQUIPMENT SHELTER NEAR THE BASE OF THE MONOPOLE DRAWING INFORMATION: =========~ DO NOT SCALE DRAWINGS. CONTRACTOR MUST VERIFY ALL DIMENSIONS AND ADVISE CONSULTANTS OF ANY ERRORS AND OMISSIONS. ALL PREVIOUS ISSUES OF THIS DRAWING ARE SUPERSEDED BY THE LATEST REVISION. THE INFORMATION CONTAINED IN THIS SET OF DOCUMENTS IS PROPRIETARY BY NATURE. ANY USE OR DISCLOSURE OTHER THAN WHICH IS RELATED TO NAMED CLIENT IS STRICTLY PROHIBITED. DRAWING TITLE: GENERAL DETAILS DRAWING NUMBER: A·5 -- I I I I ----1 ! I I \ \ FOUND MONUMENT /COPPER PIN IN CASE DOWN 0.5' ~?~rH Sr ~ \ / / C 30' / 30' / / I I I I I I \ \ / / / I I I I / / , . " o " GRAPHIC SCALE 10 20 40 BO 1~liIIIiiiiiiiiii_I---1 ( IN FEET) 1 inch = 20 ft. z o o ul q I~·I ~I IMP9 I ':;:: / @! ~jI.,-t--J-1-'-"'-14.: / I MP12 / I 41.81 GAS BLOCK (METE / rrW~AL?L~---::---::;-::==~.-.-]~ o " BUILDING .,' . • .. ,4 ."" '. : . CONCR/;5TE: ; . . ii', ' ',<1' ., .. ..~..,'.., '" .. SITE DETAIL . '.' -;,. " .. , & 15' --j I , U=GAL DESCRIPTION TH ~ T PORTION OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF SECTION 29, TOWNSHIP ;'3 NORTH, RANGE 5 r:AST, W.M., IN KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON, DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: BE,;INNING AT THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF SAID NORTHEAST QUARTER OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER; TH~NCE NORTH 88'12'38" EAST ALONG THE SOUTH LINE OF SAID NORTHEAST QUARTER OF THE NORTHWI::ST QUARTER 8777 FEET TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING; THl:NCE CONTINUING NORTH 88'12'38" EAST 2500 FEET; THENCE NORTH 1'42'40" EAST 749.65 FEET; THI:NCE NORTH 88'17'20" WEST 191.67 FEET TO THE EASTERLY LINE OF THE BENSON ROAD (STATE ROAD NO. 5C); THI:NCE SOUTHERLY ALONG SAID EASTERLY LINE ON A CURVE TO THE RIGHT WITH A RADIUS OF 1462.6(1 FEET A DISTANCE OF 487.42 FEET; THENCE CONTINUING ALONG SAID EASTERLY LINE ON A CURVE TO THE LEFT WITH A RADIUS OF 447.68 FEET, A DISTANCE OF 285.95 FEET TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING; EXCEPT THE SOUTH 30 FEET THEREOF CONVEYED TO KING COUNTY BY DEED RECORDED UNDER RECORDING NUMBER 5098735. EASEMENTS ffi CORRESPONDS WITH ITEM NUMBER IN 'SCHEDULE B' OF TITLE REPORT. TH[ FOLLOWING EASEMENTS FROM THE REFERENCED TITLE REPORT CONTAIN SUFFICIENT INFORMATION TH[: PLAN. OTHER EASEMENTS OR ENCUMBRANCES, IF ANY, MAY AFFECT THE PROPERTY, BUT LACK INFORMATION TO BE SHOWN. TO BE DEPICTED ON SUITICIENT NOTES & ffi ffi In WATER EASEMENT PER KING COUNTY AUDITOR'S FILE NO. 5183320. WATER EASEMENT PER KING COUNTY AUDITOR'S FILE NO. 5482862. WATER EASEMENT PER KING COUNTY AUDITOR'S FILE NO. 8702180421. ROADWAY SLOPE & DRAINAGE EASEMENT PER KING COUNTY AUDITOR'S FILE NO. 20010129001814. 1) TITLE PER ORDER 598448 ISSUED BY PACIFIC NORTHWEST TITLE COMPANY OF WASHINGTON, INC. DATED JULY 8, 2005. 2) FIELD WORK CONDUCTED IN JULY 2005. 3) BASIS OF BEARING: WASHINGTON STATE PLANE COORDINATE SYSTEM, NORTH ZONE (NAD83). -- .b. GENERAL SITE LOCATION J """\. D~~-,....---1 405 6 S 23RD ST f-a []J --' ~ S88'16'18"E 190.36' FOUND MONUMENT /COPPER PIN IN CASE DOWN 0.5' LEASE AREA m en oi ;::: 15' & LATITUDE/LONGITUDE POSITION PROPOSED TOWER LOCATION SET LATH \ UTILITY POLE /TRANSFORMER \ 1 __ \ 30' & 260.70' ~ S88'13'40"W___ 27TH ST 1 [30' GRAPHIC SCALE -----r-\--: L 30, \ \ 1~ ~ 501~~1O1_' ____ 201_' ~~~~~~~~"'I' \ roM-= (INFEET)=SITE LOCATIO 1 inch ~ 100 It. VICINITY MAP -NOT TO SCALE - LEGEND ----------SUBJECT BOUNDARY LINE --RIGHT-OF-WAY CENTERLINE -RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE -ADJACENT BOUNDARY LINE -----DP -----OVERHEAD POWER LINE -----up BURIED POWER LINE -----G BURIED GAS LINE -----DT OVERHEAD TELEPHONE LINE -----UT BURIED TELEPHONE LINE -----'W -----BURIED WATER LINE -----ss BURIED SANITARY SEWER -----SD BURIED STORM DRAIN -DITCH LINE/FLOW LINE . .................................... ROCK RETAINING WALL ...... , , , -VEGETATION LINE ---------CHAIN LINK FENCE -------WOOD FENCE ---------BARBED WIRE/WIRE FENCE G'J TRANSFORMER -<;>-FIRE HYDRANT J:l: LIGHT STANDARD M GATE VALVE IE POWER VAULT 83 WA TER METER IIBII UTILITY BOX JJ.. FIRE STAND PIPE -0-UTILITY POLE o TYPE I CATCH BASIN E--POLE GUY WIRE @ TYPE II CATCH BASIN tIl GAS VALVE .0.. SIGN IQI GAS METER o BOLLARD OJ TELEPHONE VAULT '" MAIL BOX o TELEPHONE RISER 234.21 SPOT ELEVATION NOTE: 1) ALL ELEVATIONS SHOWN ARE ABOVE MEAN SEA LEVEL (AMSL) ELEVATIONS REFERENCED TO THE NAVD 88 DATUM. 2) ALL TOWER, TREE AND APPURTENANCE HEIGHTS ARE ABOVE GROUND LEVEL (AGL). 3) ALL HEIGHTS REPRESENTED ARE ACCURATE TO ± 3 FEET OR ± 1% OF TOTAL HEIGHT, WHICHEVER IS GREATER. TREE LEGEND DECIDUOUS TREE o AL12 -TRUNK DIAMETER (IN) lL --TYPE AL=ALDER MP=MAPLE DS=DECIDUOUS MA=MADRONA OK=OAK CH=CHERRY EVERGREEN it DF18 195.2 TREE CE=CEDAR DF=DOUGLAS FIR HE=HEMLOCK PI=PINE EVG=EVERGREEN !L----HEIGHT AGL IF MEASURED NOTE: TREE DRIP LINES ARE NOT TO SCALE. TREE SYMBOLS REFERENCE TRUNK LOCATION ONLY. TRUNK DIAMETERS WERE APPROXIMATED AT 3.5' TO 4' ABOVE GROUND LEVEL. TREES SHOWN ARE FOR REFERENCE ONLY AND OTHER TREES AND VEGETATION MAY EXIST. SITE INFORMATION TAX LOT NUMBER SITE ADDRESS SI TE CON TACT PHONE NUMBER ZONING TOTAL LOT AREA PROJECT AREA 2923059102 2640 BENSON RD S RENTON,WA 98055 R-8 166980± S.F.(3.83± AC.) 383 S.F. LATITUDE/LONGITUDE POSITION COORDINATE DATA AT PROPOSED TOWER LOCATION: NAD 83 NAVD 88 LAT -47"27'23.6" N ELEV.= 410.4 FEET LONG -122'12'03.8" W BENCHMARK IS: GP17405-65 WSDOT BRASS DISK IN SIDEWALK AT SW CORNER BENSON AVE OVERPASS OVER INTERSTATE 405 ELEV.= 111.94 FEET ELEVATION DERIVED USING GPS. ACCURACY MEETS OR EXCEEDS 2C STANDARDS. BOUNDARY DISCLAIMER THIS PLAN DOES NOT REPRESENT A BOUNDARY SURVEY. SUBJECT AND ADJACENT PROPERTY LINES ARE DEPICTED USING FIELD-FOUND EVIDENCE AND RECORD INFORMATION. SURVEY REFERENCE 1) RENTON SHORT PLAT #70-8, KING COUNTY RECORDING NO. 8107299002. 2) PLAT OF VICTORIA HILLS PER VOL. 113, PAGES 79-83, RECORDS OF KING COUNTY. CAUTION! UNDERGROUND UTILITIES EXIST IN THE AREA AND UTILITY INFORMATION SHOWN MAY BE INCOMPLETE. STATE LAW REQUIRES THAT CONTRACTOR CONTACT THE ONE-CALL UTILITY LOCATE SERVICE AT LEAST 48 HOURS BEFORE STARTING ANY CONSTRUCTION. 1-800-424-5555 -------------- DUNCANSON Company, Inc. 145 sw 155th Street, Suite 102 Seattle. Washington 98166 Phone 206.244.4141 Fox 206.244.4455 h W L.() • • • ell .a o (9 FLO. CREW: JAR/KB FLO. BOOK: 130/62 DRAWN BY: L T JOB #: 01808.130 DATE: 8/2/05 1 OF --~ ------------~------- ~-~ -,- ~-~- I 0 , --~---~~ -~ - ~r.OI'XCABLING FROM BTS EQUIPMENT TO ANTENNAS ROUTED IN (4) 4" PVC UIG CONDUITS r-SUI'PCIRTCOAXro WALL Wll~518" UNISTRUT & LARGE MTS COAl( BLOCKS (TYP) r-~/4"EMT AT CEILING CONDUIT FROM TELCO BOl( TO BTS r-T -T -T \ - I NOKIA NOKIA PURCELL RACK ULTRASITE ULTRASITE 0 0 I I I' -0 I~I ~ESENTFIXTURE --------I~r~~-----C=:> """ -0 I I 1" EMT AT CEILING CONDUIT WI I I (3) #6 THWN AND (1) #8 GROUND """ ~ I P -P " \ , \ """ I DUPLEX GFI \ RECEPTACLE \ -0 \ """ " ~ , < P -P P P P r> <:>-P P .~ P P .p <S>-T T T T T ~-) 314" UIG PVC CONDUIT FOR POWER TO BOX LIGHTS 200 AMP EYELANDER SERVICE PANEL 200 AMP METER BASiE-J 4" PVC FROM DEMARC BOX TO TELEPHONE SERVICE POINT (SEE SHT. A-1 FOR ROUTING -120 L.F. 3" PVC CONDUIT FROM METER BASE TO ELECTRICAL SERVICE POINT (SEE SHT. A-1 FOR ROUTING -120 L.F. ±) PANEL SCHEDULE CIRCUIT DESCRIPTION , . 60 20 CIRCUIT DESCRIPTION ,-P::::UR~C::E==L=-L __ -----£G>---l' ......... :-O~--;--<>-RECEPTACLE --------0 30 ' --;--<>-LIGHTING -!-TV:..:S::::S~ ___ -----£G' --;--<>-CHURCH STORAGE o--:+-+=---o~ BOX LIGHTS --------0 " ...--.... o--:+-~-o <>---------------0 " " --------0 ~ <>- " " ---------0 <>- " " --------0 <>- " " --------0 <>- \4, FLOURESENT FIXTURE \ \ \ \ \ \ " " GFI RECEPTACLE " "-"--.... --- TELCO BACKBOARD 48" x 48" x t, PLYWOOD WI GROUND ELECTRICAL SITE PLAN 22x34 SCALE: 314" = l' l1x17 SCALE: 314" = 2' '" , , iE,lFLOURESENT FIXTURE 3"PVCFROM TRANSITION TO ABOVE GRADE EXISTING TRANSFORMER -------" ELECTRICAL NOTES 1. ALL ELECTRICAL WORK SHALL BE (;OMPLETED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE LATEST EDITION OF THE NATIONAL ELECTRIC,AL CODE AND ANY LOCAL CITY OR COUNTY CODES THAT MAY APPLY. ' 2. GROUNDING SHALL COMPLY WITH ARTICLE 250 OF THE NATIONAL ELECTRICAL CODE. 3 CONTRACTOR RESPONSIBLE FOR PERMITIING, FILINGS, INSPECTIONS AND TESTING AS REQUIRED BY THE PERMITIING AUTHORITY AND VOICESTREAM WIRELESS. 4. UNDERGROUND CONDUIT SHALL BE RIGID POLYVINYL CHLORIDE CONDUIT SCHEDULE 40, TYPE 1, CONFORMING TO UL ARTICLE 651, MANUFACTURED BY WESTERN PLASTICS OR CARLON. AIL BENDS SHALL BE 30" MINIMUM RADIUS. 5. CONTRACTOR SHALL CONTACT ALL UTILITIES FOR LOCATION OF UNDERGROUND SERVICES SERVICE LOCATIONS TO BE CONFIRMED PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION. S. ALL EQUIPMENT, WIRING, AND MAtERIALS MUST HAVE A UL LABEL. 7. CONTRACTOR SHALL PROVIDE AND INSTALL A 2" PVC CONDUIT WITH PULL ROPE FROM THE TELCO LINE BOX AND THIO TELCO DEMARCATION POINT. 8. CONTRACTOR SHALL PROVIDE AND INSTALL A 2-112" PVC CONDUIT FROM PSE SERVICEIDEMARCATION POINT AND METER BASE OR SERVICE PANEL WHERE APPLICABLE. 9. CONDUIT USED INDOORS SHALL BE EMT AND RMC FOR OUTDOORS. COUPLINGS SHALL BE RIGID STEEL AND COMPRE,SSION TYPE FOR EMT (SET SCREW FITIINGS ARE NOT PERMITIED). FOR ALL STUB-UPS, USE RMC. 10. WIRES AND CABLES SHALL BE CONTINUOUS FROM TERMINATION TO TERMINATION WITH NO SPLICES ALLOWED. 11. ALL JUNTION AND OUTLET BOXE!, SHALL BE LABELED WITH KROY TAPE OR EQUAl DESIGNATING ALL CIRCUIT NUMBERS CONTAINED IN EACH BOX. ' 12. THE DISTRIBUTION PANEL SHALL HAVE A TYPED LEGEND IDENTIFING THE LOADS AF ALL CIRCU IT BREAKERS. 13. CONTRACTOR TO INSTALL CON[)UIT SEALING COMPOUND, BLACKBURN OX DUCT SEAL OR EQUAL, FOR ALL CONDUIT!; AFTER WIRING IS PULLED AND TERMINATED. PP1 2-#12 & 1-#12 GRI) 314" PVC 2-#12 & 1-#12 GRO 112" EMT 5-#10 314" EMT 3-#S & 1-#8 GRD 1" PVC 2-#12 & 1-#12 GRD 112" EMT BOX LIGHTS DUPLEX GFI RECPTACLE WIWEATHERPROOFCOVER TVSS (TRANSEND 50) FURNISHED BY VOICESTREAM PURCELL CABINET CHURCH STORAGE ELECTRICAL BLOCK DIAGRAM PP1 2"CONDUIT ELECTRICAL SERVICE PANEL 200AMP, 1201240V, 10, 3W (3) #310 THWN IN } -------I I 20012 I I ~~--~~~~--~~I 2011 6012 3012 2011 ~L 2011 2011 , ~ I SPACE - ±--GROUND BOX _ PER NEC LIGHTS LIGHTING PPC TVSS GFCI RECEPT CHURCH STORAGE ELECTRICAL ONE LINE lbiceJ:q~· 19807 NORTHCREEK PKWY iii BOTHELL, WA 98011 OFFICE (425) 398·7600 ~PROJECT INFORMATION: BENSON RD/CHURCH MP SE4663F 2640 BENSON RD RENTON, WA 98055 -ISSUED FOR: BUILDING PERMIT II .... REVISION HISTORY: No. DATE: DESCRIPTION: CHI(. APPV. BY: BY: I f--t-_. -~.-1-- I -~ --~----.,~--, - I , l-I ~ -'-~~-- I t--. I _. r--; ~--.. ~-~ ffi: 81~2005 REV. PER PRE-APP BJT ME MEETING AI 81212005 ISSUED FOR BPS BJT MP -_. -,&.1 712112005 ISSUED DESIGN REVIEW BJT ME = PLANS PREPARED BY: B. J. THOMAS, P.E. 7607 80TH AVE NE MARYSVILLE, WA 98270 206·851-1106 '-DRAWN BY: [I AAL CHI<. BY: = APPV. BY: - BJT AM LICENSURE: I EXPIRES -08125107 EQUIPMENT: VOICESTREAM WIRELESS ANTENNAS LOCATED ON A 59'-11" AGL POLE WITH BTS EQUIPMENT IN AN EQUIPMENT SHELTER NEAR THE BASE OF THE MONOPOLE DRAWING INFORMATION: ============::! DO NOT SCALE DRAWINGS. CONTRACTOR MUST VERIFY ALL DIMENSIONS AND ADVISE CONSULTANTS OF ANY ERRORS AND OMISSIONS. ALL PREVIOUS ISSUES OF THIS DRAWING ARE SUPERSEDED BY THE LATEST REVISION. THE INFORMATION CONTAINED IN THIS SET OF DOCUMENTS IS PROPRIETARY BY NATURE. ANY USE OR DISCLOSURE OTHER THAN WHICH IS RELATED TO NAMED CLIENT IS STRICTLY PROHIBITED. DRAWING TITLE: ==================::: ELECTRICAL SITE PLAN DRAWING NUMBER: ~ .::0 Qf!1 ~ :;115 E·1 m 0;: __ '11m <: ill~ Om 2.., oS; L~::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::==J 2~ ~ I / I • \ \ \ ..- TYPICAL CADWELD BOND (SEE GROUNDING NOTE 4 & SHT. E-4 FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION) ~ BOND GROUND HALO TO MGB BOND MGB TO GROUND RII~ IG-____ BOND BTS EQUIPMENT TO MGB WI #2 GREEN STRANDED THWN (SEESHT. E-4, DETAIL5)~ GROUND ROD (TYP) (SEE GROUNDING NOTE GROUNDING HALO INSIDE SHELTER AT TOP OF WALLS WI #2 GREEN STRANDED THWN BONDED TO GROUND RING AT EACH CORNE,R-, #2 SOLID BARE TINNED COPPER WIRE SITE GROUND RING AGB AT TOP OF POLE BELOW ANTENNA ARRAYS BOND ABG TO MGB AT BOTIOM OF POLE WI #2 GREEN STRANDED THWN I I I J,.--~II ~ .. --------------.. / /' AGB I I I I I I I "", '-.. -.------I I I ----, GROUND INSPECTION WELL (SEE SHT. E-4, DETAIL 4) I t-- I I I I I I I '='--------- SYMBO" LEGEND MGB TT EGB TT • • • <0 MASTER GROUND BAR 114"x4"x24" COPPER EQUIPMENT GROUND BAR 114''x4''x12'' OR 1 14"x4"x20" COPPER EXPOSED WIRING UNDERGROUND WIRING CADWELD iYlECHANICAL CONNECTION 518"x8' COPPER CLAD STEEL GROUND ROD Ir.JSPECTION PORT EXOTHERMIC (CADWELD) BELOW GROUND (lROUND ----------------------------~. :, I' , I I I I I I I -..I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I --1 I I I I I ! • • --------....:...------------------------ "-) y BOND WALL MOUNTED EQU IPMENT TO GROUND HALO SITE GROUNDING PLAN 22x34 SCALE: 112" = l' l1x17 SCALE: 114" = l' I' I, GROUNDING NOTES 1. GROUNDING SHALL COMPLY WITH LATEST EDITION OF THE NATIONAL ELECTRICAL CODE. 2. MINIMUM BENDING RADIUS FOR GROUND CONDUCTOR IS 8". 3. NO SPLICES PERMITTED IN GROUND CONDUCTORS. 4. ALL GROUNDING CONNECTORS TO BE CLEAN AND FREE OF PAINT AT THEIR MATING SURFACES AND INSTALLED PER MANUFACTURER'S RECOMMENDATIONS. USE PENETROX OR EQUIVALENT ANTIOXIDANT GREASE. 5. ALL GROUND BAR CONNECTIONS ARE TO BE 2 HOLE LUG COMPI~ESSION TYPE. STACKED CONNECTIONS ARE NOT ACCEPTABLE. BACK TO BACK CONNECTIONS ON OPPOSITE SIDES OF THE GROUND BAR WILL BE PERMITIED. 6. ENSURE ALL MECHANICAL CONNECTORS ARE TORQUED TO THE, MANUFACTURER'S SPECIFIED VALUES. 7. MULTIPLE BONDS ON GROUND RODS TO BE SEPARATED BY AT LEAST 6" . 8. MAXIMUM RESISTANCE OF THE COMPLETED GROUND SYSTEM "HALL NOT EXCEED A RESISTANCE OF 5 OHMS TO EARTH. 9. GROUND WIRES SHALL NOT BE INSTALLED THROUGH HOLES IN ANY METAL OBJECTS OR SUPPORTS TO PRECLUDE ESTABLISHING A "CHOKE" POINT. 10. GROUND BARS SHALL NOT BE FIELD MODIFIED. 11. GROUND RING BURIAL DEPTH SHALL BE 30". 12. A CERTIFIED CONTRACTOR WILL MAKE ALL MEASUREMENTS REQUIRED TO TEST THE GROUNDING SYSTEM, USING A MEGGER OR EQUIVALENT. THE ACCEPTABLE RESISTANCE MEASURED FOR THE GROUNDING SYSTEM WILL NOT EXCEED 5 OHMS RESISTANCE. THREE DISTANCES SHALL BE USED: 1 AT 100 FEET, 1 AT 70 FEET, AND 1 AT 35 FEET. THESE DISTANCE ARE SUBJECT TO A SITE BY SITE BASIS. VOICESTREAM -WTS SHALL BE GIVEN 24 HOURS NOTICE, BEFORE. TESTING IS TO BE DONE. THE COST ASSOCIATED WITH GROUND TESTING WILL BI:: AT THE EXPENSE OF THE CONTRACTOR I, II' ~ceJ:f!~l!!· 19807 NORTHCREEK PKWY N BOTHELL, WA 98011 OFFICE (4251398-7600 ;:PROJECT INFORMATION: BENSON RD/CHURCH MP SE4663F 2640 BENSON RD RENTON, WA 98055 L..ISSUED FOR: [I BUILDING PERMIT II _ REVISION HISTORY: CHI(. APPV. No. DATE, DESCRIPTION: BY, BY, 1 I I 1 1--- I -r-'-'-j . 1 c-l .. -.. -.-~- -'--1-·---1 ' 1 " "-'-' &1 811112005 REV. PER PRE-APP BJT I ME MEETING ----_.-AI 81212005 ISSUED FOR BPS t-BJ~ MP _._ .. --_. ~I 712112005 ISSUED DESIGN REVIEW BJT I ME ;: PLANS PREPARED BY: B. J. THOMAS, P.E. 7607 80TH AVE NE MARYSVILLE, WA 98270 206-851-1106 '-DRAWN BY: [I AAL CHI(. BY: = APPV. BY: - BJT AM LICENSURE: EXPIRES 08125107 EQUIPMENT: VOICESTREAM WIRELESS ANTENNAS LOCATED ON A 59'-11" AGL POLE WITH BTS EQUIPMENT IN AN EQUIPMENT SHELTER NEAR THE BASE OF THE MONOPOLE DRAWING INFORMATION: ======~ DO NOT SCALE DRAWINGS. CONTRACTOR MUST VERIFY ALL DIMENSIONS AND ADVISE CONSULTANTS OF ANY ERRORS AND OMISSIONS. ALL PREVIOUS ISSUES OF THIS DRAWING ARE SUPERSEDED BY THE LATEST REVISION. THE INFORMATION CONTAINED IN THIS SET OF DOCUMENTS IS PROPRIETARY BY NATURE. ANY USE OR DISCLOSURE OTHER THAN WHICH IS RELATED TO NAMED CLIENT IS STRICTLY PROHIBITIOD. DRAWING TITLE: GROUNDING PLAN DRAWING NUMBER: E·2 --~--~----- TYPICAL ANTENNA, SEE RF SHEETS FOR DETAILS -~ r\ 11+--11----,( [>-ANTENNA JUMPER CABLES, ~ SEE SHEETS RF-1 AND RF-2 .---______ FOR DETAILS GROUND TAIL TO ANTENNA MOUNT __ J AGB MOUNTED TOP OF GLUE LAM POLE DIRECTLY BELOW ANTENNAS -~ ~ 'r 0000000000 I ggggggggggg~g ( I [ 1 #2 THW GREEN ROUTED WICOAX TO AGB 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 f---LNA EQUIPMENT -SEE SHEET RF-2 FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION ~ '----INSTALL GROUND AND '\ WEATHER-PROOFING KITS \ BELOW ANTENNAS (TYP) ~ \'----#2 THW GREEN GROUND TAIL (TYP ALL GROUND TAILS) ) ( ~ INSTALL GROUND AND WEATHER-PROOFING KITS NEAR EQUIPMENT (TYP) ----. COAXIAL CABLE, SEE SHEETS RF-1 AND RF-2 JUMPER CABLE, Sf::E SHEETS r BOND ALL EQUIPMENT TO MGB WITH #2 THW GREEN FOR DETAILS (TYP) \ ~-1 AND RF-2 FOR DETAILS 1 -= II 911~9;~~~~~ / //''::.-~ <= ..----/H-----I.I,J -I 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 (J :::::---(' '" [ [ #2THWGREEN GROUND TAIL (TYP) MGB MOUNTED INSIDE----, TRANSITION AT BASE OF POLE [ MGB MOUNTED NEAR BTS EQUIPMENT ----.J 'nIOOOOOOO 00 0000000 o. 0000000 '[ g g g g g g gttfg g g 000000000000 r '( 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 l_~ ~_J\I" _______________ ) L_~ ~_~__ 1 1 1 \" " ===========-==L'~_/ / 1 1 1 1 ,--------------=-----/ 1 : : 1 #2 SOLID BARE TINNED 1 1 1 1 COPPER ROUTED W/COAX 1 1 1 1 CONDUITS 1 1 1 : BOND MGB TO GROUND 1 1 1 I· BOND POWER CABINET RING WITH (2) #2 SOLID 1 I 1 I TO GROUND RING BARE TINNED COPPER 1 _ _ _ (TYP ALL MGB'S) .. 1 1 1 c---------r SITE GROUNDING RING : : : : ---______ , 1 1 1 ___ -------------------__________________ ~-1--~-------- @ ~~~~~D~:G RISER DIAGRAM 11" x 17" SCALE: NTS ~CeJ?!~IJ!' 19807 NORTHCREEK PKWY N BOTHELL, WA 98011 OFFICE (425) 398-7600 ::PRO.JECT INFORMATION: BENSON RD/CHURCH MP SE4663F 2640 BENSON RD RENTON, WA 98055 -ISSUED FOR: II BUILDING PERMIT r-REVISION HISTORY: No_ DATE: DESCRIPTION: CHI(. APPV. BY: BY: t-- -~-""--- I I 1 I 1 AI 811112005 I REV.PERPRE-APP 3 , MEETING I BJT ME ---- 1 fA 81212005 ISSUED FOR BPS BJT MP , -~- I BJT ~ 712112005 ISSUED DESIGN REVIEW ME = PLANS PREPARED BY: B. J. THOMAS, P.E. 7607 80TH AVE HE MARYSVILLE, WA 98270 206·851·1106 '-DRAWN BY: [I AAL CHI(. BY: = APPV, BY: - BolT AM LICENSURE: -- EXPIRES 08/25/07 EQUIPMENT: VOICESTREAM WIRELESS ANTENNAS LOCATED ON A 59'-11" AGL POLE WITH BTS EQUIPMENT IN AN EQUIPMENT SHELTER NEAR THE BASE OF THE MONOPOLE DRAWING INFORMATION: DO NOT SCALE DRAWINGS. CONTRACTOR MUST VERIFY ALL DIMENSIONS AND ADVISE CONSULTANTS OF ANY ERRORS AND OMISSIONS. ALL PREVIOUS ISSUES OF THIS DRAWING ARE SUPERSEDED BY THE LATEST REVISION. THE INFORMATION CONTAINED IN THIS SETOF DOCUMENTS IS PROPRIETARY BY NATURE. ANY USE OR DISCLOSURE OTHER THAN WHICH IS RELATED TO NAMED CLIENT IS STRICTLY PROHIBITED. DRAWING TITLE: ==================: ELECTRICAL GROUNDING DETAILS DRAWING NUMBER: E·3 TYPETA TYPEVN TYPE NC TYPESS TYPEW TYPEVS TYPE VB TYPEPT TYPEGT TYPEGY TYPEGR TYPEGL @ :r:!'PICAL CADWELD CONNECTIONS 0) MAIN CONDUCTOR, COPPER CABLE CD 5/8"x8' COPPER CLAD STEEL GROUND ROD o CADWELD TYPE "TA" o CADWELD TYPE "GT" @ ~~OUND ROD CONNECTION HARGER GROUNDING BAR #GB14824 OR EQUAL WITH HOLE PATIERN AND STANDOFF INSULATORS AND MOUNTING BRACKETS AS SHOWN -----~ #2 INSULATED (GRN) COPPER WIRE TO CABLE TRAY ---------~ COAX CABLE GROUNDING KITS WILONG BARREL COMPRESSION LUGS. ATIACH TO GROUND BAR & INSTALLED BY CONTRACTOR -----......... ... =CADWELD '---#2 SOLID BARE TINNED COPPER WIRE TO GROUND RING --- MASTER GROUND BAR ~--METAL FRAME WITH SOLID LID L ENGRAVED W/"GROUND" ON LID gf.!/J//J/!JJJJJjJ!JM g~;T~~E~:'6~~E~FT HOLE AT 'C-.: -, v \. .r COVER TOP OF GRADE j GROUND WELL, 12" '" x 24" LONG CONC. PIPE WITH COVER (SEE ABOVE) ~,Jt;~_#2 BARE TINNED COPPER LOOPED IN TEST WELL. .L-_L PERIMITER GROUND RING 7 @ ~~OUND INSPECTION WELL --- #2 SOLID BARE TINNED COPPER WIRE TO GROUND RING COAX CABLE GROUNDING KITS @ ~~OUND BAR DETAILS --- HARGER GROUNDING BAR #GB114412G OR EQUAL #2 SOLID BARE TINNED COPPER WIRE CADWELD (TYPE-GL) AGB TOP OF UTILITY POLE BELOW ANTENNAS BUSS BAR OR FLAT SURFACE OF EQUIP./WIREWAY hf~r::-:::l'---NO-LUX ANTI-OXIDIZING COMPOUND 1/4" S.S. HEXNUT --< Lb-dJL 1/4" S.S STAR WASHER (TYP.) --- #2 STRD. GREEN INSULATED WIRE -_~._\ 1/4" X 1" S.S HEXBOL T 114" S.S LOCKWASHER (TYP.) 1/4" X 1/2" S.S FLAT WASHER (TYP.) NOTES 1. TYP. ALL GROUND WIRES FOR ELECT. AND OTHER EQUIPMENT. 2. THE ENTIRE LUG AND AREA TO BE SPRAYED WITH CLEAR LAQUER OR COLD GALVINIZING SPRAY 3. GROUND LEADS TO BE CADWELDED TO GROUND RING. 1-----TWO HOLE COMPRESSION CRIMP LUG (#2) DETAIL IS TYP. OF TWO NUTS & BOLTS 5 TYPICAL CABINET GROUNDING DETAIL E-4 N.T.S. lbiceJ?!~qJ· 19807 NORTHCREEK PKWV N BOTHELL, WA 98011 OFFICE 1425) 398-7600 = PROJECT INFORMATION: BENSON RD/CHURCH MP SE4663F 2640 BENSON RD RENTON, WA 98055 -ISSUED FOR: [I BUILDING PERM~ I _ REVISION HISTORY: No. DATE: DESCRIPTION: CHIC.. APPY. BY: BY: , I --- , ---1-+ , I _. --.------- , 8/; 1I20~51 REV PER PRE-APP & I BJT ME • MEETING ~ ._----- A 8/2/2005 ISSUED FOR BPS MP ------.. 8 7/21/2005 ISSUED DESIGN REVIEW I BJT ME , = PLANS PREPARED BY: B. J. THOMAS, P.E. 7607 80TH AVE HE MARYSVILLE, WA 98270 206·851·1106 -DRAWN BY: [I AAL CHI<. BY: = APPV. BY: - LICENSURE: LffiIRES EQUIPMENT: BJT AM 081251071 VOICESTREAM WIRELESS ANTENNAS LOCATED ON A 59'-11" AGL POLE WITH BTS EQUIPMENT IN AN EQUIPMENT SHELTER NEAR THE BASE OF THE MONOPOLE DRAWING INFORMATION: ============! DO NOT SCALE DRAWINGS. CONTRACTOR MUST VERIFY ALL DIMENSIONS AND ADVISE CONSULTANTS OF ANY ERRORS AND OMISSIONS. ALL PREVIOUS ISSUES OF THIS DRAWING ARE SUPERSEDED BY THE LATEST REVISION. THE INFORMATION CONTAINED IN THIS SET OF DOCUMENTS IS PROPRIETARY BY NATURE. ANY USE OR DISCLOSURE OTHER THAN WHICH IS RELATED TO NAMED CLIENT IS STRICTLY PROHIBITED. DRAWING TITLE: ELECTRICAL GROUNDING DETAILS DRAWING NUMBER: E·4 ---------- ANTENNA A-1 B-1 G-1 GPS 911 SITE LOADING CHART ANTENNA AZIMUTH MECHANICAL SECTOR MODEL# VENDOR (TN) DOWNTILT ALPHA ADFDP-1S2-6565B-R1 DM ANDREW 0' O' BETA ADFDP-1S2-6565B-R1 DM ANDREW 190' 0' GAMMA ADFDP-1S2-6565B-R1DM ANDREW 240' 0' NIA 5S532A SYMMETRICOM NIA NIA NIA BSDB1SUS COMTELCO NIA NIA COAXIAL CABLE NOTES: 1. ALL COAXIAL CABLE CONNECTIONS TO BE WEATHERPROOFED. 2. CONTRACTOR TO PROVIDE DRIP LOOPS IN CABLES AND JUMPERS WHERE NECESSARY 3. TAGGING: 3.1 ALL COAXIAL CABLES TO BE MARKED WITH COLOR CODED TAPE TO INDICATE THE ANTENNA SECTOR. 3.2 COLORED ELECTRICAL TAPE SHALL MARK EACH END OF CABLE AND EACH E,ND OF JUMPERS AS CLOSE TO EACH END AS POSSIBLE. (NOT TO INTERFERE WITH WEATHERPROOFING). 4. COAXIAL CABLE SPECIFICATIONS REQUIRE CABLE SUPPORT EVERY 3'-0" ON CENTER. CONTRACTOR SHALL SUPPLY SUPPORTS AS REQUIRED TO MEETTHIS REQUIREMENT CONNECTORS ELECTRICAL TAPE (1 LAYER) RADIATION CENTER 57'-6" 51'-6" 57'-6" TBD TBD STEP 1 STEP 2 1----4" -----I CAN USA HEAVY WALL HEAT SHRINK ALL COAX ---~ CONNECTIONS INSTALL PER MANUFACTURERS INSTRUCTIONS STEP 3 COAXIAL CABLE WEATHERPROOFING NTS. CABLE LENGTH 95' 90' 95' TBD TBD COAXIAL CABLE NUMBER OF COAX RUNS ANDREW 7/S" DIA 4 ANDREW 7/S" DIA 4 ANDREW 7/S" DIA 4 ANDREW 1/2" DIA 1 ANDREW 1/2" DIA 1 ANTENNA AND COAX GENERAL NOTES 1. ALL ANTENNA AND COAXIAL ANTENNA CABLE TO BE FURNISHED BY VOICESTREAM AND INSTALLED BY CONTRACTOR. 2. COAX COLOR CODING: ANTENNAS TO BE NUMBERED IN A CLOCKWISE MANNER FROM TRUE NORTH AND COLOR CODED AS FOLLOWS: SECTOR ANTENNA DESIGNATION -COLOR CODING ALPHA SECTOR A1 RED BAND 4. A3 3 RED BANDS A4 4 RED BANDS A2 2 RED BANDS BETA SECTOR B1 GREEN BAND B3 3 GREEN BANDS B4 4 GREEN BANDS B2 2 GREEN BANDS GAMMA SECTOR G1 YElLOW EaAND G3 3 YELLOW ~ANDS G4 4 YElLOW EaANDS G2 2 YELLOW EJANDS 3. THE ABOVE COAX COLOR CODING APPLIES TO SECTORIZED SITES; FOR OMNI SITES USE THE ATO, BTO, GTO COLOR CODES ONLY. 5. COAX SHALL BE TAGGED WITH COLOR CODING AT (2) PLACES USING 1" WIDE WEATHERPROOF COLORED VINYL TAPE, AT THE FOLLOWING LOCATIONS: #1 AT ANTENNA CONNECTION #2 AT ENTRY TO EQUIPMENTCABINET RUN COAXIAL CABLE WITH MINIMUM 12" SLACK 12" FROM EDGE. OF EQUIPMENT CABINETS, THROUGH PCV COAX CONDUITS, UP INTERIOR OF MONOPOLE AND DISTRIBUTE TO EACH ANTENNA DEVICE. FURNISH AND INSTALL MINIMUM OF (3) GROUND KITS PER COAXIAL CABLE PER ELECTRICAL DRAWINGS. VERIFY NUMBER OF ANTENNAS, CABLE AND CABLE DIAMETER WITH PROJECT MANAGER. Tx AND Rx FREQUENCIES FOR SEATTLE MARKET: Tx: 1965 -1985 Mhz Rx: 1885 -1905 Mhz TYPE OF EQUIPMENT LENGTH OF CABLE RUN DIA OF CABLES MIN. BENDING RADIUS CITYTALKI 3-0", 6'-0", AND 10'-0" ULTRASITES SUPERFLEX JUMPER RUNS 1/2" 1 1/4" CITYTALKI 3-0",6'-0", AND 10'-0" ULTRASITES FLEX JUMPER RUNS 1/2" 4" ULTRASITES 0" THRU 100'-0" 7/8" 10" UL TRASITES WILNA 101" THRU 150'-0" 7/S" 10" ULTRASITES 151'-0" AND GREATER 1 5/S" 20" CITYTALK 0" THRU 170'-0" 7/8" 10" CITYTALK 131'-0" AND GREATER 1 5/S" 20" @ COAXIAL CABLE SPECIFICATIONS -~ceS9,f@m· 19807 NORTHCREEK PKWY N BOTHELL, WA 98011 OFFICE (425) 398-7800 := PROJECT INFORMATION: BENSON RD/CHURCH MP SE4663F 2640 BENSON RD RENTON, WA 98055 = ISSUED FOR: BUILDING PERMIT II r-REVISION HISTORY: No, DATE: DESCRIPTION: CHIC. APPV. BY: BY: I -1--- I I I -- I ffi S/11/2005 REV, PER PRE-APP MEETING I BJT ME .-'-. -----'-~ S/2/2005 ISSUED FOR BPS , BJT MP -I -.--~ ISSUED DESIGN REVIEW BJT ME 7/21/2005 ~ PLANS PREPARED BY: B. J. THOMAS, P.E. 7607 80TH AVE NE MARYSVILLE, WA 98270 206·851·1106 -DRAWN BY: [I AAL CHI<. BY: = APPV. BY:- BJT AM LICENSURE: I EXPIRES 08/25107 EQUIPMENT: VOICESTREAM WIRELESS ANTENNAS LOCATED ON A 59'-11" AGL POLE WITH BTS EQUIPMENT IN AN EQUIPMENT SHELTER NEAR THE BASE OF THE MONOPOLE DRAWING INFORMATION: ======~ DO NOT SCALE DRAWINGS. CONTRACTOR MUST VERIFY ALL DIMENSIONS AND ADVISE CONSULTANTS OF ANY ERRORS AND OMISSIONS. ALL PREVIOUS ISSUES OF THIS DRAWING ARE SUPERSEDED BY THE LATEST REVISION. THE INFORMATION CONTAINED IN THIS SET OF DOCUMENTS IS PROPRIETARY BY NATURE ANY USE OR DISCLOSURE OTHER THAN WHICH IS RELATED TO NAMED CLIENT IS STRICTLY PROHIBITED. DRAWING TITLE: RF DETAILS DRAWING NUMBER: RF·1 ~ om ~~ ;:: m !:j i z ~------------------------------------~~ ALPHA SECTOR 6'-0" SUPERFLEX 7/8" COAXIAL JUMPER CABLE CABLE -95' 1 RED TXlRX 1 DIN (F) I IDIN (F)I 6'-0" SUPERFLEX 7/8" COAXIAL JUMPER CABLE CABLE -95' 3 RED TX 3 lOIN (F) I lOIN (F) I 6'-0" SUPER FLEX 7/8" COAXIAL JUMPER CABLE CABLE -95' 4RED TX4 DIN (F) I I DIN (F) 6'-0" SUPER FLEX 7/8" COAXIAL JUMPER CABLE CABLE -95' 2RED TXlRX 2 -' DIN (F) DIN (F) BETA SECTOR 6'-0" SUPER FLEX 7/8" COAXIAL JUMPER CABLE CABLE -90' I DIN (F) I DIN (F)I 1 GREEN TXlRX 1 6'-0" SUPER FLEX 7/8" COAXIAL JUMPER CABLE CABLE -90' -' DIN (F) L DIN (F) I 3 GREEN TX 3 6'-0" SUPERFLEX 7/8" COAXIAL JUMPER CABLE CABLE -90' DIN (F) lOIN (F) I 4 GREEN TX4 6'-0" SUPERFLEX 7/8" COAXIAL JUMPER CABLE CABLE -90' lOIN (F) I JDIN (F)I 2 GREEN TXlRX 2 GAMMA SECTOR 6'-0" SUPERFLEX 7/8" COAXIAL JUMPER CABLE CABLE -95' 1 YELLOW TXlRX 1 I DIN (F) I DIN (F) I 6'-0" SUPERFLEX 7/8" COAXIAL JUMPER CABLE CABLE -95' 3 YELLOW TX3 DIN (F) I DIN (F) 6'-0" SUPERFLEX 7/8" COAXIAL JUMPER CABLE CABLE·95' DIN (F) DIN (F) 4 YELLOW TX 4 6'·0" SUPERFLEX 7/8" COAXIAL JUMPER CABLE CABLE·95' -' DIN (F) L IDIN (F) I 2 YELLOW TXlRX 2 3'-0" FLEX 3'-0" FLEX JUMPER CABLE JUMPER CABLE LNA I 6'-0" FLEX JUMPER CABLE 6'-0" FLEX JUMPER CABLE 3'-0" FLEX 3'-0" FLEX JUMPER CABLE JUMPER CABLE LNA i 3'-0" FLEX 3'-0" FLEX JUMPER CABLE JUMPER CABLE LNA I 6'-0· FLEX JUMPER CABLE I 6'-0" FLEX JUMPER CAElLE I 3'-0" FLEX 3'-0" FLEX JUMPER CABLE JUMPER CABLE LNA I 3'-0" FLEX 3'-0" FLEX JUMPER CABLE JUMPER CABLE LNA 6'-0" FLEX JUMPER CAIlLE =CI 6'-0" FLEX JUMPER CABLE 1 3'-0" FLEX 3'-0" FLEX JUMPER CABLE JUMPER CABLE LNA I A-1 A-3 A-4 A-2 ADFDP-182-6565B-R1 B-1 B-3 B-4 B-2 AD FDP-182-6565B-R1 G-1 G-3 G-4 G·2 ADFDp·182·6565B-R1 DM DM SWEEP TEST PROCEDURE: THE FOLLOWING PROCEDURE DESCRIBES THE TEST AND FAULT FINDING PROCEDURE TO BE FOLLOWED FOR ALL ANTENNAS. 1. TEST EQUIPMENT SHOULD CONSIST OF A SWEEP OSCILLATOR SET TO RUN BETWEEN 1800 AND 2000 MHz, DIRECTIONAL COUPLER WITH AT LEAST 35dB DIRECTIVITY AND SCALAR NETWORK ANAL YZER WITH RESOLUTION OF BETTER THAN 0.2dB. A MATCHED 50 Ohm LOAD AND SHORT CIRCUIT TERMINATION ARE ALSO REQUIRED. 2. SET UP THE RETURN LOSS MEASURING SET AS PER THE MANUFACTURERS INSTRUCTIONS AND CALIBRATE WITH THE SHORT (OdB RETURN LOSS VSWR ~ INFINITY.) 4. COMPOSITE RETURN LOSS: DISCONNECT THE BOTTOM JUMPER AT THE BTS AND CONNECT IT TO THE MAIN PORT OF THE BRIDGE. RETURN LOSS OF THE COMPOSITE JUMPERS, FEEDER AND ANTENNA SHOULD BE < -18dB (VSWR > 1.5: 1) BETWEEN 1800 AND 2000 MHZ. 4. FEEDER RETURN LOSS: TURN OFF THE SWEEP GENERATOR, DISCONNECT THE TOP JUMPER AT THE ANTENNA AND CONNECT A DUMMY LOAD TO THE END OF THE TOP JUMPER WITH A DIN - N ADAPTER. POWER UP THE GENERATOR AND MEASURE THE RETURN LOSS LOOKING INTO THE BOTTOM JUMPER. THE RETURN LOSS SHOULD NOT EXCEED ·18dB ( VSWR > 1.3 : 1 ) BETWEEN 1800 AND 2oo0MHZ. 5. FEEDER INSERTION LOSS: REPLACE THE LOAD WITH A SHORT CIRCUIT TERMINATION AND MEASURE THE MAXIMUM AND MINIMUM RETURN LOSS BETWEEN 1800 AND 2000. ADD THIS TOGETHER AND DIVIDE BY 4 TO GIVE THE AVERAGE 1 WAY INSERTION LOSS WHICH SHOULD BE < 3dB. 6. IF THE CONDITIONS IN 4, 5 AND 6 ARE MET THEN THE TEST IS COMPLETE. IF 41S BAD BUT 5 & 6 ARE OK THEN REPLACE THE ANTENNA AND RETEST. IF 5 & 6 ARE BAD THEN MEASURE RL OF MAIN FEEDER ONLY. IF RETURN LOSS IMPROVES TO -20 OR BETTER OR INSERTION LOSS IMPROVES BY MORE THAN 2dB THEN REPLACE OR RETERMINATE THE BOTTOM AND TOP JUMPER. OTHERWISE REPLACE THE MAIN FEEDER RUN. NOTIFY PROJECT MANAGEMENT AND RF ENGINEERING OF ANY FAULTY HARDWARE. 7. ALL TEST RESULTS SHOULD BE CLEARLY MARKED WITH SITE, FEEDER NUMBER, DATE, MEASURED TIME FIGURE 1 GROUNDING CLAMP SLOT FOR ADJUSTABLE BAND CLAMP <1===,('1---1/4" 20 GROUNDING STRAP ASSEMBLY ---"'1 HARDWARE "'--_-#6 GROUND LEAD FIGURt 2 j;O;;;;( __ ADJUSTABLE " BAND CLAMP PUTTY TAPE FIGURE 3 __ --#6 GROUND LEAD ELECTRICAL TAPE OVER MASTIC TAPE I~-~GROUNDING CLAMP ~_-'fW0 HOLE COMPRESSION CRIMP LUG (#6) TO GROUND BAR FIGURE 4 FIGURE 5 FIGURE 6 @ ~!~~~~ CABLE GROUNDING DM -1'12"{- ,---",~~ @ ~~~IAL CABLE DIAGRAM EQUIPMENT CABINETS o +~~~~~-1'·07/8" -~~~~----,~ +---71/8" _~~L -t-t-F=!--TYPE "N" CONNECTOR 51/8" 1 73/4" [" +~~ (ANTENNA) --'171'-(MOUNTING BASE) 33/8" GPS ANTENNA DATA MECHANICAL SPECIFICATIONS PART NUMBER HEIGHT DIAMETER WEIGHT 58532A 6.42" (163mm) 3.54"0 (90mm) 15 oz (427 g) CONNECTORS MOUNTING HARDWARE TYPE"N" OPTION AUB MAST ELECTRICAL SPECIFICATIONS IN BASE OF ANTENNA FREQUENCY POLARIZATION GAIN VSWR POWER HANDLING 1565.42 -1585.42MHz RIGHT-HAND CIRCULAR >30 dBi <2.5 250 WATTS CW @ ~.~:. ANTENNA SPECIFICATIONS TYPE "N" CONNECTOR IN BASE OF ANTENNA o ~-----r--------------------~-.-t 1 3/8" -,iL-} -----1'·3" ---------:+r+ 911 ANTENNA DATA MECHANICAL SPECIFICATIONS PART NUMBER HEIGHT DIAMETER WEIGHT CONNECTORS BSDB18U8 15 in 1.35 in 41bs (1) TYPE "N" STANDARD MOUNTING HARDWARE BSMNT1 ELECTRICAL SPECIFICATIONS FREQUENCY GAIN VERTICAL BW. VSWR POWER RATING 825-896, 1850·1990 MHz UNITY 75° <2:1 250 WATTS @ ~~!. ANTENNA SPECIFICATIONS o 54" L-_..J'~k " C ') ,1"3.5" r ANDREW ANTENNA DATA MECHANICAL SPECIFICATIONS PART NUMBER HEIGHT WIDTH DEPTH WEIGHT ADFDP-182·6565B·R1 DM 54 in 12 in 3.5 in 34.51bs CONNECTORS STANDARD MOUNTING HARDWARE (4)7·16 DIN INCLUDED ELECTRICAL SPECIFICATIONS FREQUENCY POLARIZATION GAIN AZIMUTH BW. ELEVATION BW. 1850·1990 MHz ±45° 15.2 dBI/17.6 dBi 65° 6.5° BEAM TILT VSWR POWER HANDLING 0%·7% <1.5:1 200 WATTS @ ~~:'ENNA SPECIFICATIONS ~ceJ??~m· 19807 NORTHCREEK PKWY N BOTHELL, WA 98011 OFFICE 1425) 398-7600 = PROJECT INFORMATION: BENSON RD/CHURCH MP SE4663F 2640 BENSON RD RENTON, WA 98055 '-ISSUED FOR: [I BUILDING PERMIT r REVISION HISTORY: No. DATE: DESCRIPTION: CHI(.. APPV. BY: BY: I I t---t--. __ ... -_. --c-- I I I 1 I I I I -----1 I-I -- ~I 8/11/2005 REV. PER PRE·APP BJT I ME MEETING t-----.-, _.-_.-j-._ ... -_. --.~- ~ 8/2/2005 ISSUED FOR BPS BJT MP At-7/21/2005 J ISSUED DESIGN REVIEW j-- BJT ME ::: PLANS PREPARED BY: B. J. THOMAS, P.E. 7607 80TH AVE NE MARYSVILLE, WA 98270 206·851·1106 '-DRAWN BY: [I AAL CHI(. BY:;: APPV. BY: = BJT AM LICENSURE: EXPIRES 08/25107 EQUIPMENT: VOICESTREAM WIRELESS ANTENNAS LOCATED ON A 59'·11" AGL POLE WITH BTS EQUIPMENT IN AN EQUIPMENT SHELTER NEAR THE BASE OF THE MONOPOLE DRAWING INFORMATION: ==========~ DO NOT SCALE DRAWINGS. CONTRACTOR MUST VERIFY ALL DIMENSIONS AND ADVISE CONSULTANTS OF ANY ERRORS AND OMISSIONS. ALL PREVIOUS ISSUES OF THIS DRAWING ARE SUPERSEDED BY THE LATEST REVISION THE INFORMATION CONTAINED IN THIS SETOF DOCUMENTS IS PROPRIETARY BY NATURE. ANY USE OR DISCLOSURE OTHER THAN WHICH IS RELATED TO NAMED CLIENT IS STRICTLY PROHIBITED. r DRAWING TITLE: ============::::::; RF DETAILS '-DRAWING NUMBER: --------- RF·2 LEGEND SYMBOL QTY. 7 . '. ---" --. ------'" TBD ---'- NOTES ~-----------------17' ----------------~ "'k----------------------"-r NAME EMERALD GREEN ARBORVITAE (Thuha occidentalis) 40'-10" DWARF PERWINKLE (vinca minor) SIZE MIN.4'HT. 4"CONT. MIN. (3) VIGOROUS LEADERS 3' ~PR()POSED CHURCH ~ STORAGE ~ C;-'l ~ /1 i'"/ l~~ PROPOSED (18) ~ ~~",'1=::::l=:::It=Jc:::J=::Z::=C::::BI~tI! __ ~ EMERALD GREEN i _~ Ii1 , , ARBORVITAE , f( -) r"1 I <.-'PJ '-.,'se! COMMENTS SPACED 4' OC 5' FROM BUILDING 18" O.C. TRIANGULAR SPACING '" PROPOSED ~OICESTREAM EQUIPMENT~ BUILDING ~ ~-'-"><"" In~ ~/ ~ N 1 ) / "'-L \~. ,-_--,v-' . . - -_ . , LANDSCAPE PLAN 22x34 SCALE: 1/4" = l' 11x17 SCALE: 1/8" = l' 18" MIN PLANTING PIT 2X ROOTBALL SIZE TYPICAL CONIFER @ ~~~N~TING DETAIL STAKING & GUYING REQ'D ON TREES 5' & TALLER: (3) BVC LODGEPOLE STAKES (HIGGINS CORP.- (453-836-4643) INSTALL VERTICAL SECURE TREE TRUNK TO STAKES WITH CHAINLOCK #2 BY LISTER B&B: REMOVE ALL STRINGS, SYNTHETIC WRAP & TWINE, FOLD NATURAL BURLAP UNDER OR REMOVE REMOVE WIRE BASKET 2" MULCH -PER SPEC. CREATE WATERING RING PLANTING PIT BACKFILL AS PER SPECIFICATIONS COMPACT BY HAND METHODS AND WATER TO REMOVE ALL VOIDS EXISTING GRADE FEATHER FINISH GRADE INTO EXISTING GRADE BREAK/SCARIFY SIDES AND BODOM OF PIT. 6" COMPACTED PLANTING PIT BACKFILL TO SUPPORT TREE EXISTING SUBSOIL NOTES: TOPSOIL NOTES 1. OVEREXCAVATE SUBGRADE AS REQUIRED TO PROVIDE FOR 6" COMPACTED DEPTH IMPORTED TOPSOIL AND 2" COMPACTED DEPTH MULCH. SCARIFY OR ROTOTILL SUBGRADE TO A MIN. 4" DEPTH. REMOVE DEBRIS & STONE LARGER THAN 3/4" IN ANY DIMENSION REMAINING ON THE SURFACE AFTER TILLING. 2. PLACE IMPORTED SANDY LOAM TOPSOIL IN TWO LIFTS: (1) PLACE MIN 4" DEPTH TOPSOIL AND ROTOTILL TO A DEPTH OF 8 INCHES TO INCORPORATE NEW TOPSOIL WITH SUBSOIL. (2) FOLLOWING TILLING, PLACE MIN. 2-INCH DEPTH TOPSOIL AND COMPACT. PLANT STANDARDS 1. CONFORM TO WASHINGTON STATE DEPT. OF AGRICUL lURE (WSDA): WASHINGTON STATE STANDARDS FOR NURSERY STOCK, ORDER NO 1627 2. AMERICAN NATIONAL STANDARDS INSTITUTE (ANSI): ANSI-Z 60.1-1986 AMERICAN STANDARDS FOR NURSERY STOCK 3. AMERICAN JOINT COMMIDEE OF HORTICULTURE NOME,NCLATURE: STANDARD PLANT NAMES, CURRENT EDITION DELIVERY, STORAGE, AND HANDLING 1. PROTECT PLANT FROM HARM AND DAMAGE AT ALL TIMI=S. PROTECT TREES DURING TRANSPORT BY TYING IN BRANCHES AND COVERING ALL EXPOSED BRANCHES. JOB CONDITIONS 1. PLANT DURING PERIODS NORMAL FOR OPTIMUM GROWTH, AS DETERMINED BY SEASON, WEATHER CONDITIONS, AND ACCEPTED PRACTICE. PlANTING OPERATIONS MAY BE CONDUCTED UNDER UNSEASONABLE CONDITIONS BY ACCEPTING FULL RESPONSIBILITY FOR ANY SUBSEQUENT, RESULTING LOSSES. UNDERGROUND CONDITIONS 1. BE FAMILIAR WITH UTILITY, MECHANICAL, AND ELECTRICAL PLANS SO THAT DIGGING OPERATIONS DO NOT DAMAGE LINES WARRANTY 1. WARRANT ALL PLANT MATERIAL FOR HEALTHY, THRIVING CONDITIONS FOR ONE YEAR FOLLOWING PLANT INSTALLATION. 2. DURING GUARANTEE PERIOD, IMMEDIATELY REMOVE AND REPLACE ALL DEAD, DISEASED, DYING, BROKEN OR DISAPPEARED PLANT MATERIALS (DUE TO ANY CAUSE, EXCEPT AS NOTED BELOW). USE SPECIFIED PLANTS AND PERFORM AT NO ADDITIONAL COST TO THE OWNER. 3. DURING GUARANTEE PERIOD, THE GUARANTOR IS NOT RESPONSIBLE FOR REPLACING PLANTS DESTROYED OR DAMAGED BY VANDALISM, ACCIDENTS CAUSED BY OTHERS, OR ACTS OF GOD. PLANT QUALITY 1. PLANTS SHALL BE FRESH, WELL FOLIAGED, IN PRIME CONDITION WHEN IN LEAF, AND EXHIBITING NORMAL HABIT OF GROWTH. ALL LEADERS AND BUDS INTACT, FREE 2. 3. 4. 5. OF DISEASE, INJURY, AND ANY SIGN OF INSECTS. FREE OF SEEDS, WEED ROOTS AND OTHER CONTAMINANTS. PLANTS ARE TO BE NURSERY GROWN. PLANTS TO BE ACCLIMATED TO THE PROJECT SITE ENVIRONMENTAL CONDITIONS. NO COLD STORAGE PLANTS. BALL AND BURLAPPED (B&B) STOCK IS REQUIRED TO HAVE A ROOT STRUCTURE SUFFICIENT TO INSURE SURVIVAL AND HEALTHY GROWTH. CONTAINER GROWN MATERIALS ARE REQUIRED TO HAVE SUFFICIENT ROOT TO HOLD THE THE EARTH INTACT WHEN REMOVED FROM THE CONTAINERS BUT NOT BE ROOT BOUND. FERTILIZER 1. FORMULA 4-2-2 "TRANSPLANTER" AS MANUFACTURED BY PACIFIC AGRO CO., APPLY AT RATE AS PER MANUFACTURER'S PRINTED INSTRUCTIONS. 2. AGRIFORM TABLETS. 21-GRAM SIZE, AS MANUFACTURED BY AGRIFORM INTERNATIONAL CHEMICALS, INC. 20-10-5 ANALYSIS. APPLY AT RATE OF: MULCH TREES: 4 TABLETS SHRUBS: 1 TABLET STEERCO, GROCO, OR OTHER APPROVED COMMERCIALLY AVAILABLE FERTILE MULCH. PLANT INSTALLATION 1. EXCAVATE PLANTING HOLE. 2. PLACE PLANT IN UPRIGHT POSITION IN CENTER OF PIT, REMOVE ANY ROOT COVERING AS DETAILED AND SPREAD ROOTS TO HAVE A NATURAL SPREAD AND DISTRIBUTION. 3. BACKFILL WITH EXCAVATED MATERIAL. TAKE CARE NOT TO INJURE ROOT SYSTEM. THOROUGHLY PACK AND PUDDLE SOIL AROUND ROOTS. 4. FERTILIZE AS SPECIFIED 5. STAKE AND GUY AS SPECIFIED 6. IMMEDIATELY AFTER COMPLETION OF ALL PLANTING, THOROUGHLY WATER PLANTING AREA THEN MUCH ALL PLANTING AREA TO A MINIMUM COMPACTED DEPTH OF 2 INCHES AND AS DETAILED MAINTENANCE 1. MAINTAIN PLANTING AREA FOR A PERIOD OF ONE YEAR UNTIL THE END OF THE WARRANTY PERIOD. 2. WATER PLANTINGS AREAS BY THOROUGH SPRINKLING. PROVIDE AS NEEDED TO KEEP GROUND'MOIST AND PLANTS HEALTHY. PREVENT SOIL EROSION. 3. PRUNE, CULTIVATE, FERTILIZE, SPRAY AND PERFORM OTHER NECESSARY OPERATIONS. ~CeS{t~Dl· 19807 NORTHCREEK PKWV N BOTHELL, WA 98011 OFFICE (425) 398·7600 ;: PROJECT INFORMATION: BENSON RD/CHURCH MP SE4663F 2640 BENSON RD RENTON, WA 98055 '-ISSUED FOR: BUILDING PERMIT _ REVISION HISTORY: No. DATE: DESCRIPTION: CHI(. APPV. BY: BY: --~.' .---- c-' -- ---+- , . ~. ---. I BJT B 8/1112005 REV. PER PRE-APP ME MEETING -" ----_ ...... "'-- & 8/2/2005 ISSUED FOR BPS BJT MP .-.---. ~ 7/21/2005 ISSUED DESIGN REVIEW , BJT I ME = PLANS PREPARED BY: B. J. THOMAS, P.E. 7607 80TH AVE NE MARYSVILLE, WA 98270 206·851·1106 '-DRAWN BY: [I AAL CHI(. BY: = APPV. BY: - BJT AM LICENSURE: IEXPIRES--' 08/25/07 EQUIPMENT: VOICESTREAM WIRELESS ANTENNAS LOCATED ON A 59'-11" AGL POLE WITH BTS EQUIPMENT IN AN EQUIPMENT SHELTER NEAR THE BASE OF THE MONOPOLE _ DRAWING INFORMATION: =======::::: DO NOT SCALE DRAWINGS. CONTRACTOR MUST VERIFY ALL DIMENSIONS AND ADVISE CONSULTANTS OF ANY ERRORS AND OMISSIONS. ALL PREVIOUS ISSUES OF THIS DRAWING ARE SUPERSEDED BY THE LATEST REVISION. THE INFORMATION CONTAINED IN THIS SET OF DOCUMENTS IS PROPRIETARY BY NATURE. ANY USE OR DISCLOSURE OTHER THAN WHICH IS RELATED TO NAMED CLIENT IS STRICTLY PROHIBITED, ~DRAWING TITLE: ==========~ LANDSCAPE PLAN DRAWING NUMBER: L·1 SEC. 29, TWN. 23N, RGE. 5W, W.M. j ! ::'CLND tviON:"IMENT / / / j / I I I I I I I / , l I / I I I ! r / I I EX. BUiLDING APN #2923059102 I / ! 4 \ \ \ I 1 .. [ I / / / / / '/ / / / / / / / / / /// // // /// / / / / / / / ,/ / / / / // / / // / / / / / / / / / / // // /' / / ./ / / / / // / // / / // / / /' / / / // / / ,/ / / / / / / / / / // / / / / / / // / / // / / / / / / / / / / / ./,,/ / / / // / / / / / / / / // / / / '/ / / / / / / / / / / / / /~ / / /" / / / / / / / / / / / / /' ./ / / , / / / ,./ / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / I i I I I I 1m if) 192 I~ n I;" o /7 I I I I I I / I I I / I I I I I I I I I I / / / / / IF / / // / / PROJECT SCOPE 1HE PROJECT CONSIST OF THE INSTALLATION OF A CELLULAR COMIAUNICATION SITE WITH A 60' HIGH AGL STEEL MONOPOLE AND BTS EQUIPMENT LOCATED IN A 385 SF± EQUIPMENT SHELTER. ACCESS TO 1HE SITE WILL BE PROVIDED 8Y 1HE FIRST PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH ASPHALT PARKING LOT (TELCOM TECHNICIAN SITE ESTIMATED TO 8E VISIT 1-2 TIMES PER MON1H). LITTLE SITE IMPACT IS ANTICIPATED AND 1HEREFORE MINIMAL T.E.S.C. MEASURES ARE REQUIRED. PROJECT CONTRACTOR SHALL EVALUATE SITE CONDITIONS AS WEA1HER CHANGES OCCUR AND 1HE PROJECT PROGRESSES TO COMPLIETION. COMPLIETE FAMIUARITY WITH 1HE NOTES CONTAINED IN THIS PLAN SET IS REQUIRED PRIOR TO BEGINNING WORK. IT IS ANTICIPATED THAT 1HE MINIMAL DEVIELOPED DRAINAGE 1HAT RESULTS FROM 1HE PROJECT WILL SAFELY SHEET FLOW AND DISPERSE INTO THE VlEGETATION THAT SURRDUND 1HE PROJECT SITE. NO IMPACT ON EXISTING CONDITIONS OR ADVERSE AFFECTS TO THE LOCAL SOIL AND/OR SURFACE WATER CONDITIONS IS ANTICIPATED. ALL EARTHWORK SPOILS SHALL BE REMOVIED FROM 1HE SITE. ,--J[lINlrs IN FILTER FABRIC MATERIAL SHALL BE SPLICED AT POSTS. USE STAPLES, WIRE RINGS, OR EQUIVALENT TO AnACH FABRIC TO POSTS. ,---2"X 2" BY 14 Go. WIRE I FILTER FAI3RIIO-~ U ____ ..:6::..·""M"'A"'X·'--__ -JU "'-MINIMUM 4"x4" TRENC~i-../ ~ACKFILL TRENCH WITH ~ NATIVE SOIL OR 3/4"-1.5" WASHED GRAVEL. 2"X 4" WOOD POST. STEEL FEI~CE-J POSTS. REBAR. DR EQUIVALENT. NOTE: FILTER FABRIC FENCES SHALL BE INSTALLED ALONG CONTOUR WHENEVER POSSIBLE. SILT FENCE DETAIL N.T.S. SlL T FENCE MAINTENANCf STANDARDS 1. ANY DAMAGE SHALL BE REPAIRED IMMEDIA TEL Y. 2. IF CONCENTRA TED FLOWS ARE EVIDENT UPHILL OF THE FENCE. THEY MUST BE INTERCEPTEO AND CONVEYED TO A SEDIMENT TRAP OR POND. J. IT IS IMPORTANT ro CHECK THE UPHILL SIDE OF THE FENCE FOR SIGNS OF THE FENCE CLOGGING AND ACnNG AS A BARRIER TO FLOW AND THEN CAUSING CHANNEUZAnON OF flOWS PARALLEL TO THE FENCE. IF THIS OCCURS. REPLACE THE FENCE OR REMOVE THE TRAPPED SEDIMENT. 4. SEDIMENT MUST BE REMOVED WHEN THE SEDIMENT IS I> INCHES HIGH. 5. IF THE FILTER FABRIC (GEOTEXnLE) HAS DETERIORA TED OUE TO UL TRA VIOLET BREAKDOWN. IT SHALL BE REPLACED. EARTHWORK QUAHTTTY EST1MATE 1HE PROJECT EAR1HWORK IS THAT ASSOCIATED Wl1H SHAPING 1HE CELL TOWER EQUIPMENT SHED PAD AND 1HE INSTALLATION OF 1HE STEEL MONOPOLIE PIER FOUNDATION. QUANTITY ESTIMATE: 30 cY. ± (BANK) EQUIPMENT SHELTER 385 SQ.FT. TOTAL 385 sa.FT. ± , I I I 190.36' PROJECT SITE I L 260.70' SB'B';3:W'W S 27TH ST I I UNDERL VING PARCEL MAP 1" = 200' EROSION & SEDIMENT CONTROL NOTES 1. APPROVAL OF THIS EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONllROL (ESC) PLAN DOES NOT CONSTlTlJTE AN APPROVAL OF PERMANENT ROAD OR DRAINAGE DESIGN (E.G. SIZE AND LOCA 110N OF ROADS. PIPES. RESTRICTORS. CHANNELS. RETENTION FACILITIES. UllLlllES. ETC.). 2. THE IMPLIEMENTATION OF THESE ESC PLANS AND THE CONSTRUCTION. MAINTENANCE. REPLACEMENT. AND UPGRADING OF THESE ESC FACILITIES IS THE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE APPLICANT/ESC SUPERVISOR UNTIL ALL CONSTRUCl1 ON IS APPROVED. 3. THE BOUNDARIES OF THE CLIEARING LIMITS SHOWN ON THIS PLAN SHALL BE CLEARLY FLAGGED BY A CONTINUOUS LENGTH OF SURVEY TAPE (OR FENCING. IF REQUIRED) PRIOR TO CONSllRUCTION. DURING THE CONSTRUCl1DN PERIOD. NO DISTlJRBANCE BEYOND THE CLEARING LIMITS SHALL BE PERMITTED. THE CLEARING LIMITS SHALL BE MAINTAINED BY THE APPLICANT/ESC SUPERVISOR FOR THE DURATION OF CONSTRUCTION. 4. THE ESC FACILITIES SHOWN ON THIS PLAN MUST BE CONSTRUCTED PRIOR TO OR IN CONJUNCTION I'<1TH ALL CUEARING AND GRADING SO AS TO ENSURE THAT THE TRANSPORT OF SEDIMENT TO SURFACE WATERS. DRAINAGE SYSTEMS. AND ADJACENT PROPERTIES IS MINIMIZED. 5. THE ESC FAClLlllES SHOWN ON THIS PLAN ARE THE MINIMUM REQUIREMENTS FOR ANTlCIPAllED SITE CONDITIONS. DURING THE CONSTRUCllON PERIOD. THESE ESC FACILITIES SHALL BE UPGRADED AS NEEDED FOR UNEXPECTED STORM EVIENTS AND MODIFIED TO ACCOUNT FOR CHANGING SITE CONDIllONS (E.G. ADDITIONAL SUMP PUMPS. RELOCATION OF DITCHES AND SILT FENCES. ETC.). 6. THE ESC FACILITIES SHALL BE INSPECTED DAILY BY THE APPLICANT/ESC SUPERVISOR AND MAINTAINED TO ENSURE CONTINUED PROPER FUNCTIONING. WRITTEN RECOROS SHALL BE KEPT OF WEEKLY REVIEWS OF THE TESC FACILITIES DURING THE WET SEASON (OCT. 1 TO APRIL 30) AND OF MONTHLY REVIEWS DURING THE DRY SEASON (MAY 1 TO SEPT. 30). 7. ANY AREAS OF EXPOSED SOILS, INCLLDING ROADWAY EMBANKMENTS. THAT WILL NOT BE DISTlJRBED FOR TWO DAYS DURING THE WET SEASON OR SEVEN DAYS DURING THE DRY SEASON SHALL BE IMMEDIATELY STABILIZED I'<1TH THE APPROVIED ESC METHODS (E.G .. SEEDING. MULCHING. PLASl1C COVERING. ETC.). B. ANY AREA NEEDING ESC MEASURES, NOT REQUIRING IMMEDIATE ATTENllON. SHALL BE ADDRESSED WITHIN FIFTEEN (15) DAYS. 9. THE ESC FACILITIES ON INACTIVIE SITES SHALL BE INSPECTED AND MAINTAINED A MINIMUM OF ONCE A MONTH OR WITHIN 48 HOURS FOLLOI'<1NG A STORM EVENT. 10. AT NO TIME SHALL MORE THAN ONE (1) FOOT OF SEDIMENT BE ALLOWED TO ACCUMULAllE I'<1THIN A CATCH BASIN. ALL CATCH BASINS AND CONVEYANCE LINES SHALL BE CLIEANED PRIOR TO PAVING. THE CLEANING OPERATION SHALL NOT FLUSH SEDIMENT-LADEN WATER INTO THE DOWNSTREAM SYSTEM. 11. STABILIZED CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCES AND ROADS SHALL BE INSTALLED AT THE BEGINNING OF CONSTRUCTION AND MAINTAINED FOR THE DURATION OF THE PROJECT. ADDITIONAL MEASURES. SUCH AS WASH PADS. MAY BE REQUIRED TO ENSURE THAT ALL PAVED AREAS ARE KEPT CLEAN FOR THE DURATION OF THE PROJECT. 12. ANY PERMANENT FLOW CONTROL FACILITY USED AS A TEMPORARY SETllUNG BASIN SHALL BE MODIFIED WITH THE NECESSARY EROSION CONTROL MEASURES AND SHALL PROVIDE ADEQUATE STORAGE CAPACITY. IF THE FACILITY IS TO FUNCTION ULl1MAllELY AS AN INFILTRATION SYSTEM. THE TEMPORARY FACILITY MUST BE GRADED so THAT THE BOnOM AND SIDES ARE AT LEAST THREE FEET ABOVE THE FINAL GRADE OF THE PERMANENT FACILITY. 13. WHERE SllRAW MULCH FOR TEMPORARY EROSION CONTROL IS REQUIRED. IT SHALL BE APPLIED AT A MINIMUM THICKNESS OF TWO TO THREE INCHES. 14. PRIOR TO THE BEGINNING OF THE WET SEASON (OCT. 1). ALL DlSTlJRBED AREAS SHALL BE REVIEWED TO IDENTIFY WHICH ONES CAN BE SEEDED IN PREPARAllON FOR THE I'<1NTER RAINS. DISTURBED AREAS SHALL BE SEEDED WITHIN ONE WEEK OF THE BEGINNING OF THE WET SEASON. A SKETCH MAP OF THOSE AREAS TO BE SEEDED AND THOSE AREAS TO REMAIN UNCOVERED SHALL BE SUBMITTED TO THE DOES INSPECTOR. THE ODES INSPECtOR CAN REQUIRE SEEDING OF ADDITIONAL AREAS IN ORDER TO PROTECT SURFACE WA llERS. ADJACENT PROPERTIES. OR DRAINAGE FACILITIES. GENERAL NOTES 1. ALL WORK PERTAINING TO THIS PROJECT SHALL BE SUBJECT TO INSPEC110N BY THE CITY OF RENTON INSPECTOR OR HIS DESIGNATED REPRESENTATIVE. 2. PRIOR TO BEGINNING CONSTRUCTION. CONTRACTOR SHALL COORDINAllE A PRECONSTUCTION CONFERENCE WITH THE CITY OF RENTON INSPECTION UNIT. 3. ALL GRADING SHALL COMPLY I'<1TH THE CITY OF RENTON CODES AND ORDINANCES. SITE WORK NOTES 1. IT IS SOLIE RESPONSIBIUTY OF THE CONSTRUCTION CONTRACTOR TO LOCATE THE EXISTING UTILITIES PRIOR TO BEGINNING CONSTRUCTION. ANY UTlUTIES SHOWN ARE APPROXIMATE AND PROVIDED AS A COURTESY. 2. EXISTING ACTIVIE UTILITIES (I.E. SEWER. WATER. GAS. ELECTRIC. ETC.) ENCOUNTERED DURING WORK SHALL BE PROTECTED WHERE REQUIRED FOR THE PROPER EXECUTION OF 1HE WORK. UllL1T1ES REQUIRING RELOCATION SHALL BE AS DIRECTED BY ENGINEERS. EXTREME CAUTION SHOULD BE USED BY THE CONTRACTOR WHEN EXCAVATING OR DRIWNG PIERS AROUND OR NEAR UTILITIES. CONTRACTOR SHALL PROVIDE SAFETY TRAINING FOR THE WORKING CREW. THIS I'<1LL INCLLDE BUT NOT BE LIMITED TO A TRENCHING'" EXCAVATION. 3. ALL SITE WORK SHALL BE AS INDICATED ON THE DRA~NGS AND Sl1PULATED IN THE DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTlON SPEClFlCA110NS. 4. ALL RUBBISH. STUMPS. AND CONSTRUCTION DEBRIS SHALL BE REMOVED FROM THE SITE AND DISPOSED OF AT AN APPROVED OFF-SITE LOCA1l0N. 5. FINISH SITE GRADES SHALL BE SUCH 1HAT SURFACE WATER FLOWS AWAY FROM THE PCS EQUIPMENT AND TOWER AREAS. 6. THE SUB GRADE SHALL BE COMPACTED TO A FIRM NON-'I1ELDING CONDITION AND UNIFORM GRADE PRIOR TO PLACEMENT OF BASE ROCK AND/OR ASPHALT PAVEMENT. 7. EXISTING INACTIVIE UTILITIES (SEWER, GAS. WATER. ELIECTRIC. ETC.). WHICH INTERFERE 1'<11H THE EXECUTION OF THE WORK. SHALL BE REMOVIED AND/OR CAPPED. PLUGGED OR 01HERWISE DISCONTINUED AT POINTS WHICH I'<1LL NOT INTERFERE WITH THE EXECUTION OF THE WORK. ALL UTILITY ABANDONMENT SHALL BE SUBJECT TO THE APPROVAL OF ENGINEERING. OWNER AND/OR LOCAL UTILITIES. 8. ALL LANDSCAPE AREAS DISTlJRBED BY THE CONSTRUCTION WORK SHALL BE RESTORED TO PRE-ElaSTlNG GRADE AND CONDITION. ANY DAMAGED LANDSCAPING PLANTS. TREES. AND/OR SHRUBS SHALL BE REPLACED 1'<11H LIKE KIND AND SIZE. 9. CONTRACTOR SHALL MINIMIZE DISTlJRBANCE TO 1HE EXISllNG SITE TO THE MAXIMUM EXTENT POSSI8LIE DURING CONSTRUCTION. EROSION CONTROL MEASURES. IF REQUIRED. SHALL BE IN ACCORDANCE TO THIS PLAN AND ANY AND ALL LOCAL GUIDELINES FOR EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL. -------- 1fJf-~ " ~L...<..~.rvCJ\ .. "--~' ,,-,,--_,,~--__ ~,-",",\>'-..--~~ call 2 Working Days Betore Yau Dig 1-800-424-5555 ~tilnl .. Underground Location Came (ID,MT,ND,OR,WAI LEGAL DESCRIPTION VICINITY MAP N.T.S. A88REVIA TED PER ASSESSOR RECORDS: E!EG SW COR OF NE 1/4 OF NW 1/4 TH N 88-12-38 E 87.77 FT TO POS TH N 88-12-36 E 250 FT TH N 01-42-40 E 749.65 FT TH 191.67 FT TO ELY IN OF BENSON RD TH SLY ALG SD ELY LN 773.37 FT TO POB LESS C!M RGTS LESS CO RD FlROJECT SITE DATA am: _at SE4663A am: NMIi: BENSON ROAD am: 1IIlIlIE8.: 2640 BENSON ROAD. RENTON. WA 98055 OWIL I. REP: TIM WICKS OWILI. AIXlIE88: 10414 SE 164TH ST. RENTON. WA 98055 TAX ACCOIM' NO.: 2923059102 CONTACT LIST DeWLC St VOICESTREAM WIRELESS (425) 398-7691 _ B.J. THOMAS. P.E. (206) 851-1106 avL. SII_=_ LlTCHFIELID ENGINEERING PH. (425) 821-503B IUNEYCIt DUNCANSON CO. INC. (206) 441-4141 CENTER OF SITE (PROPOSED MONOPOLE) LAT: 47" 27' 23.6" N LONG: 122' 12' 3.8" W NAD 83 WET SEASON GRADING NOTES 1. THE CONSTRUCTlON SEQUENCE SHALL BE MODIFIED. AS NECESSARY TO MINIMIZE THE AREA OF UNSTABUZED SOIL A MAXIMUM OF 1.000 SOUARE-FEET OF SOIL SHALL BE EXPOSED AT ANY TIME. 2. EARTHEN AREAS THAT ARE SUBJECT TO CONTRIBUl1NG SEDIMENTS DURING STORM EVENTS AND WHERE EARTH MOVEWENT IS NOT ANTICIPATED FOR 48-HOURS SHALL BE STABILIZED A USING GROUND COVER BMP'S TO STABILIZE THE SOIL USE STRAW MULCH AT A RATE OF 1.5# PER SQUARE FOOT OR 6" DEPTH WHATEVER IS GREATER. 3. WET SEASON TESC MEASURES I'<1LL BE EXPANDED TO INCLUOE THE FOLLOWING A SECOND SILT FENCE 10 FEET INSIDE THE ORIGINAL SILT FENCE. 4. SOILS SHALL NOT BE DISTlJRBED EXCEPT FOR ACTIJAL CONSTRUCTION ACl1V1T1ES. PARKING IS ALLOWED ON PAVED AND/OR GRAVEL SURFACES ONLY. 5. SLOPES 811 AND GREATER I'<1THOUT ESTABLISHED GROUNDCOVIER I'<1LL BE STABILIZED WITH PLASTIC SHEETING. 6 MIL (MINIMUM). THE SHEETING SHALL BE ANCHORED WITH SAND BAGS LOCATED 5' APART ON THE PERIMETER AND 10 FEET ON CENTER ON THE REMAINDER OF THE SHEETING. A MINIMUM OF 2 FEET OVERLAP IS REQUIRED ON ALL OVERLAPPING SHEETS. 6. CONCENTRATED WATER DISCHARGING FROM THE SITE SHALL BE MONITORED FOR TlJRBIDITY. MAXIMUM ALLOWABLE TURBIDITY OR DISCHARGED WATER I'<1LL BE 5 NTU OVIER BACKGROUND. 7. WHEN RAINFALL IS HEAVY (DEFINED AS RAINFALL HARD ENOUGH TO PRODUCE SEDIMENT RUN-OFF FROM THE EXPOSED DIR'!). ALL EXPOSED EARTHWORK SHALL BE COVERED. NO OTHER CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITY SHALL OCCUR ON PERVIOUS SURFACES DURING THESE PERIODS OF HEAVY RAIN. a ALL DRAINAGE SWALES SHALL BE FULLY VlEGETATED. SWALES SHALL BE SODDED IF THE VEGETATION GROI'<1NG IN THE SWAUES IS INSUFFICIENT TO PROVIDE WATER QUALITY TREATMENT AND TO PREVIENT EROSION OF THE SWALIE. 9. FlLllER FABRIC (GEOllEXTILIE FABRIC) SHALL BE INSTALLED BENEATH THE ENTIRE CONSTRUCTION ENllRANCE. SPECIAL NOTE TO CONTRACTOR ANV SITE DEVELOPMENT OTHER THAN THE CONSTRUCTION OF 1HE CELLULAR COMMUNICATIONS PROJECT SHALL BE ADDRESSED BY OTHERS. THIS DRAINAGE AND TEMPORARY EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL PLAN ADDRESSES THE CONSTRUCTION WORK AND ACTIVITIES ASSOCIATED WITH THE CELLLLAR COMMUNICATIONS PROJECT ONLY. 19807 NORTH CREEK PARKWAY N, BOTHELL, WA 98011 I APPROVE~~~~~~ ____________ _ " CITY OF RENTON Da=te-\ ,. CD I{) o ~ I <0 ~ I CO SHEET 10f 1 JOB No. o o o N VICINITY MAP NOT TO SCALE --- PARCEL NUMBER: 2923059102 LEGAL DESCRIPTION: PER ASSESSOR RECORDS: BEG SW COR OF NE 1/4 OF NW 1/4 TH N 88-12-38 E 87.77 FT TO POB TH N 88-12-38 E 250 FT TH N 01-42-40 E 749.65 FT TH 191.67 FT TO ELY LN OF BENSON RD TH SLY ALG SD ELY LN 773.37 FT TO POB LESS CIM RGTS LESS CO RD MULTI FAMILY RESIDENTIAL SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL /1 :; / I I I ------J FOU~ID MONUMENT ICOPf'ER I -S~6EHsr / I \ \ \ \ \ --~~ , / I , I I I I I I I I ! I d <= OJ 6 cc I!! ~ i£ MULTI FAMILY RESIDENTIAL ., . , '. ," .• ;. .' , , , "i " ,0',' i 'i ,; . ; 260.70' S 27TH ST I ---.I SCHOOL PROPERTY (E) PARKING LOT ___ -(P) 34'-10" x 11'-0" VOICESTREAM SHELTER (SEE SHT. A-3 FOR SHELTER DETAILS) (P) 60' AGL STEEL MONOPOLE 24"0 (P) 4" UlG PVC POWER ROUTING 120 L.F. ± & (P) 3" UIG PVC TELCO ROUTING 120 L.F. ± UTILITY POLE (POWER & TELCO SERVICE SOURCE) O/H UTILITY OVERALL SITE PLAN 22x34 SCALE: 1" = 40' 11x17 SCALE: 1"=80' 40' I o ! 20' 40' 80' I -----------------~----------------- ~iceS€!JM~· 19807 NORTHCREEK PKWV N BOTHELL, WA 98011 OFFICE (4251 398·7600 ~PROJECT INFORMATION: BENSON RD/CHURCH MP SE4663F 2640 BENSON RD RENTON, WA 98055 -ISSUED FOR: BUILDING PERMIT _ REVISION HISTORY: No. DATE: DESCRIPTION: CHK. APPV. BY: BY: -------------- -- --- ----------- ~ 8/11/2005 REV. PER PRE-APP MEETING BJT ME - ~ 8/212005 ISSUED FOR BPS BJT MP ~------- & 7/21/2005 ISSUED DESIGN REVIEW BJT ME := PLANS PREPARED BY: B. J. THOMAS, P.E. 7607 80TH AVE NE MARYSVILLE, WA 98270 ,'-206·851·1106 '-DRAWN BY: CHK. BY: = APPV. BY:- [L----I _AAL------"-----_BJT ---'--------A_M ~ _ LICENSURE: ••• A. .... 1,"_0,< • ~6£~~:\" ~!il3F ; l r z ~ ~~""J.tY4J SSIOMLl\~ '-trTlI-' I ExpiRES 08/25/07 I \ = EQUIPMENT: VOICESTREAM WIRELESS ANTENNAS LOCATED ON A 59'-11" AGL POLE WITH BTS EQUIPMENT IN AN EQUIPMENT SHELTER NEAR THE BASE OF THE MONOPOLE j , = DRAWING INFORMATION: DO NOT SCALE DRAWINGS. CONTRACTOR MUST VERIFY ALL DIMENSIONS AND ADVISE CONSULTANTS OF ANY ERRORS AND OMISSIONS. ALL PREVIOUS ISSUES OF THIS DRAWING ARE SUPERSEDED BY THE LATEST REVISION. THE INFORMATION CONTAINED IN THIS SET OF DOCUMENTS IS PROPRIETARY BY NATURE. ANY USE OR DISCLOSURE OTHER THAN WHICH IS RELATED TO NAMED CLIENT IS STRICTLY PROHIBITED. " = DRAWING TITLE: SITE PLAN =DRAWING NUMBER: A· 1 I I I I I ~ (E) VEGETATION ~ / I / / / / ~ l / / / / / / / / / / / I I I I / / / / / / / / & l / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / I / I I / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / I I / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / ~(E)GRASS~ / / / / / / ;' / / / / / / / / /25'-5" ~ l / / / / / / ~(E)CHURCH BUILDING ~ / / / / / / / / (P) VOICESTREAM BTS EQUIPMENT AREA (E) SHED TO BE REMOVED , MIN SETBACK FROM (E) CHURCH BUILDING . I. 1 :: > / / / \ ENLARGED SITE PLAN 22x34 SCALE: 114" -l' 11x17 SCALE: 118" = l' (P) LANDSCAPING (SEE SHT. L-1 FOR DETAILS) (P) VOICESTREAM SHELTER (SEE SHT. A-3 FOR DETAILS) (P) CHURCH STO~ .r-1.r,T WIDE SAW CUT (E) CURB & SLOPE NEW CONC RAMP FROM (E) ASPHALT FINISH GRADE TO (P) CONC BUILDlN(, SLAB ------(P\ 6' WIDE ROLL UP DOOR (MATCH (P) 3' WIDE SHELTER DOOR) (P) 4' WIDE SAW CUT (E) CURB & SLOPE NEW CONC.RAMP FROM (E) ASPHALTFINISH GRADE TO (P) CONC BUILDING SLAB ~ (E) WALKWAY ~ </ <J ~ (E) PARKING LOT ~ ___ -Wi 3/4" UIG PVC CONDUIT FOR POWER TO BOX LIGHTS ____ -(PI (5) 4" UIG PVC CONDUITS ___ -'r' (2) STANDARD BOX LIGHTS (P) 4" UIG PVC POWER ROUTING 120 L.F. ± & (P) 3" UIG PVC TELCO ROUTING 120 L.F. ± (SEE SHT. A-1 FOR ROUTING) ___ -(Pl 59'-11" AGL STEEL MONOPOLE 24"0 , -.... -~.--.----.. -.-----_ .. ----------- I- ::::::":11 lANceJ:~IJJ· 19807 NORTHCREEK pKWY N BOTHELL, WA 98011 OFFICE (425) 398·7600 ~ PROJECT INFORMATION: BENSON RD/CHURCH MP SE4663F 2640 BENSON RD RENTON, WA 98055 '-ISSUED FOR: [I BUILDING PERMIT II r-REVISION HISTORY: No. DATE: DESCRIPTION: CHK. APPV. BY: BY: I I -------+--+---1 ---------+----~--+--+----1 /\3 811112005 REV. PER PRE-APP BJT [' ME ~ MEETING -+-----1--- ~ 8/212005 ISSUED FOR BPS BJT MP 7/21/2005 ISSUED DESIGN REVIEW BJT ME ~ PLANS PREPARED BY: B. J. THOMAS, P.E. 7607·,80TH AVE NE , . MARYSVILLE, WA 98270 206·851·1106 r-LICENSURE: CHK. BY: = APPV. BY: ~ I BJT I AM II ....... 'fi~\ . ~ j . ."'''' "?:~ ~ .. ~,,~.?, 37041 ~~ It ~~~£S~~ ;SIOML~' ...... I EXPIRES 08/25107-] = EQUIPMENT: VOICESTREAM WIRELESS ANTENNAS LOCATED ON A 59'-11" AGL POLE WITH BTS EQUIPMENT IN AN EQUIPMENT SHELTER NEAR THE BASE OF THE MONOPOLE =DRAWING I.NFORMATlON: DO NOT SCALE DRAWINGS. CONTRACTOR MUST VERIFY ALL DIMENSIONS AND ADVISE CONSULTANTS OF ANY ERRORS AND OMISSIONS. ALL PREVIOUS ISSUES OF THIS DRAWING ARE SUPERSEDED BY THE LATEST REVISION. THE INFORMATION CONTAINED IN THIS SET OF DOCUMENTS IS PROPRIETARY BY NATURE. ANY USE OR DISCLOSURE OTHER THAN WHICH IS RELATED TO NAMED CLIENT IS STRICTLY PROHIBITED. = DRAWING TITLE: ENLARGED SITE PLAN = DRAWING NUMBER: A·1 • 1 PAINT NOTE: RADOME AND POLE SHALL BE PAINTED ANTI-GLARE BROWN STRUCTURAL NOTE: NEW POLE STRUCTURAL DESIGN BY OTHERS. :--+---\---(E) UTILITY POLE CHURCH BLDG TOP OF POLE 59'-11" AGL RAD CENTER 57'-6" AGL AZIMUTH 1900 RAD CENTER 51'-6" AGL RADOME WI ANTENNAS WITHIN SHROUD-----I II-----PR'OP()SE:DGPSANTENNA 25'-5" BLDG ~-------T---r--------~---SETBACK ,.--'---FOUNDATION BY STRUCTURAL ENGINEER EAST ELEVATION 22x34 SCALE: 3/16" = 1 '-0" 11 x17 SCALE: 3/32" = 1 '-0" (P) VOICESTREAM SHELTER (SEE SHT. A-3 FOR ENCLOSURE DETAILS) .. WJCeJ:~lJJe 19807 NORTHCREEK PKWY N BOTHELL, WA 98011 OFFICE (425) 398· 7!i00 ~PROJECT INFORMATION: BENSON RD/CHURCH MP SE4663F 2640 BENSON RD RENTON, WA 98055 '-ISSUED FOR: [I BUILDING PERMIT ;-REVISION HISTORY: No, DATE: DESCRIPTION: CHK, APPV. BY: BY: fA 8/11/2005 REV. PER PRE-APP BJT MEETING ------- I ISSUED FOR BPS ~ 8/2/2005 BJT & 7/21/2005 ISSUED DESIGN REVIEW BJT ~ PLANS PREPARED BY: B. J. THOMAS, P.E. 7607 80TH AVE NE MARYSVILLE,WA 98270 206·851·1106 ME MP ME CHK. BY: = APPV. BY: ~ I BJ1" I AM II ;-LICENSURE: ....... \ .1' H ()4t~~ ~ 'hi~:\ FS B : '" z • ~~1§d70~~ ~&"--'_ 'Is '~ :~'IoNi.Lr~ ...... ...- I EXPIRES 08125/()T] = EQUIPMENT: VOICESTREAM WIRELESS ANTENNAS LOCATED ON A 59'-11" AGL POLE WITH BTS EQUIPMENT IN AN EQUIPMENT SHELTER NEAR THE BASE OF THE MONOPOLE =DRAWING INFORMATION: DO NOT SCALE DRAWINGS. CONTRACTOR MUST VERIFY ALL DIMENSIONS AND ADVISE CONSULTANTS OF ANY ERRORS AND OMISSIONS. ALL PREVIOUS ISSUES OF THIS DRAWING ARE SUPERSEDED BY THE LATEST REVISION. THE INFORMATION CONTAINED IN THIS SET OF DOCUMENTS IS PROPRIETARY BY NATURE. ANY USE OR DISCLOSURE OTHER THAN WHICH IS RELATED TO NAMED CLIENT IS STRICTLY PROHIBITED. = DRAWING TITLE: SITE ELEVATIONS = DRAWING NUMBER: A·2 LEGEND SYMBOL QTY, 7 TBD NOTES NAME EMERALD GREEN ARBORVITAE (Thuha occidentalis) 40'-10" DWARF PERWINKLE (vinca minor) SIZE MIN,4'HT, 4"CONT, MIN, (3) VIGOROUS LEADERS ~-----------------17' ----------------~ PROPOSED (18) EMERALD GREEN ARBORVITAE COMMENTS SPACED 4' OC 5' FROM BUILDING 18" O.C. TRIANGULAR SPACING 3' ""' PROPOSED ~OICESTREAM EQUIPMENT~ BUILDING , '''''';''''''''''~~I \ LANDSCAPE PLAN 22x34 SCALE: 114" = l' 11x17 SCALE: 118" = l' --' --' ;'li f-a a a:: PLANTING PIT 2X ROOTBALL SIZE TYPICAL CONIFER @ ~~N~TING DETAIL STAKING & GUYING REQ'O ON TREES 5' & TALLER: (3) BVC LODGEPOLE STAKES (HIGGINS CORP.- (453-836-4643) INSTALL VERTICAL SECURE TREE TRUNK TO STAKES WITH CHAINLOCK #2 BY LISTER B&B: REMOVE ALL STRINGS, SYNTHETIC WRAP & TWINE, FOLD NATURAL BURLAP UNDER OR REMOVE. REMOVE WIRE BASKET 2" MULCH -PER SPEC. CREATE WATERING RING PLANTING PIT BACKFILL AS PER SPECIFICATIONS COMPACT BY HAND METHODS AND WATER TO REMOVE ALL VOIDS EXISTING GRADE FEATHER FINISH GRADE INTO EXISTING GRADE BREAK/SCARIFY SIDES AND BODOM OF PIT. 6" COMPACTED PLANTING PIT BACKFILL TO SUPPORT TREE EXISTING SUBSOIL NOTES: TOPSOIL NOTES 1. OVEREXCAVATE SUBGRADE AS REQUIRED TO PROVIDE FOR 6" COMPACTED DEPTH IMPORTED TOPSOIL AND 2" COMPACTED DEPTH MULCH. SCARIFY OR ROTOTILL SUBGRADE TO A MIN, 4" DEPTH. REMOVE DEBRIS & STONE LARGER THAN 314" IN ANY DIMENSION REMAINING ON THE SURFACE AFTER TILLING. 2. PLACE IMPORTED SANDY LOAM TOPSOIL IN TWO liFTS: (1) PLACE MIN 4" DEPTH TOPSOIL AND ROTOTILL TO A DEPTH OF 8 INCHES TO INCORPORATE NEW TOPSOIL WITH SUBSOIL. (2) FOLLOWING TILliNG, PLACE MIN. 2-INCH DEPTH TOPSOIL AND COMPACT. PLANT STANDARDS 1. CONFORM TO WASHINGTON STATE DEPT, OF AGRICULTURE (WSDA): WASHINGTON STATE! STANDARDS FOR NURSERY STOCK, ORDER NO. 1027 ! 2. AMERICAN NATIONAL STANDARDS INSTITUTE (ANgl): ANSI-Z 60.1-1986 AMERICAN STANDARDS FOR NURSERY STOCK , 3. AMERICAN JOINT COMMIDEE OF HORTICULTURE NOMENCLATURE: STANDARD PLANT NAMES, CURRENT EDITION I DELIVERY, STORAGE, AND HANDLING 1. PROTECT PLANT FROM HARM AND DAMAGE AT ALL TIMES. PROTECT TREES DURING TRANSPORT BY TYING IN BRANCHES AND COVERING ALL EXPOSED BRANCHES. JOB CONDITIONS 1. PLANT DURING PERIODS NORMAL FOR OPTIMUM GROWTH, AS DETERMINED BY SEASON, WEATHER CONDITIONS, AND ACCEPTED PRACTICE, PLANTING OPERATIONS MAY BE CONDUCTED UNDER UNSEASONABLE CONDITION" BY ACCEPTING FULL RESPONSIBILITY FOR ANY SUBSEQUENT, RESULTING LOSSES. UNDERGROUND CONDITIONS 1, BE FAMILIAR WITH UTILITY, MECHANICAL, AND ELt>CTRICAL PLANS SO THAT DIGGING OPERATIONS DO NOT DAMAGE LINES WARRANTY 1. WARRANT ALL PLANT MATERIAL FOR HEALTHY, THRIVING CONDITIONS FOR ONE YEAR FOLLOWING PLANT INSTALLATION. 2. DURING GUARANTEE PERIOD, IMMEDIATELY REMOVE AND REPLACE ALL DEAD, DISEASED, DYING, BROKEN OR DISAPPEARED PLANT MATERIALS (DUE TO ANY CAUSE, EXCEPT AS NOTED BELOW). USE SPECIFIED PLAN'rs AND PERFORM AT NO ADDITIONAL COST TO THE OWNER. 3. DURING GUARANTEE PERIOD, THE GUARANTOR If; NOT RESPONSIBLE FOR REPLACING PLANTS DESTROYED OR DAMAGED BY VANDALISM, ACCIDENTS CAUSED BY OTHERS, OR ACTS OF GOD. PLANT QUALITY 1. PLANTS SHALL BE FRESH. WELL FOLIAGED, IN PRIME CONDITION WHEN IN LEAF, AND EXHIBITING NORMAL HABIT OF GROWTH, ALL LEADERS AND BUDS INTACT, FREE . I OF DISEASE, INJURY, AND ANY SIGN OF INSECTS. FREE OF SEEDS, WEED ROOTS AND OTHER CONTAMINANTS. 2. PLANTS ARE TO BE NURSERY GROWN. 3. PLANTS TO BE ACCLIMATED TO THE PROJECT SITE ENVIRONMENTAL CONDITIONS. NO COLD STORAGE PLANTS. 4. BALL AND BURLAPPED (B&B) STOCK IS REQUIRED TO HAVE A ROOT STRUCTURE SUFFICIENT TO INSURE SURVIVAL AND HEALTHY GROWTH. 5. CONTAINER GROWN MATERIALS ARE REQUIRED TO HAVE SUFFICIENT ROOT TO HOLD THE THE EARTH INTACT WHEN REMOVED FROM THE CONTAINERS BUT NOT BE ROOT BOUND. FERTILIZER 1. FORMULA 4-2-2 "TRANSPLANTER" AS MANUFACTURED BY PACIFIC AGRO CO., APPLY AT RATE AS PER MANUFACTURER'S PRINTED INSTRUCTIONS, 2. AGRIFORM TABLETS. 21-GRAM SIZE, AS MANUFACTURED BY AGRIFORM INTERNATIONAL CHEMICALS, INC. 20-1 0-5 ANALYSIS. APPLY AT RATE OF: MULCH TREES: 4 TABLETS SHRUBS: 1 TABLET STEERCO, GROCO, OR OTHER APPROVED COMMERCIALLY AVAILABLE FERTILE MULCH, PLANT INSTALLATION 1. EXCAVATE PLANTING HOLE. 2. PLACE PLANT IN UPRIGHT POSITION IN CENTER OF PIT, REMOVE ANY ROOT COVERING AS DETAILED AND SPREAD ROOTS TO HAVE A NATURAL SPREAD AND DISTRIBUTION. 3. BACKFILL WITH EXCAVATED MATERIAL. TAKE CARE NOT TO INJURE ROOT SYSTEM. THOROUGHLY PACK AND PUDDLE SOIL AROUND ROOTS. 4. FERTILIZE AS SPECIFIED. 5. STAKE AND GUY AS SPECIFIED 6. IMMEDIATELY AFTER COMPLETION OF ALL PLANTING, THOROUGHLY WATER PLANTING AREA THEN MUCH ALL PLANTING AREA TO A MINIMUM COMPACTED DEPTH OF 2 INCHES AND AS DETAILED MAINTENANCE 1. MAINTAIN PLANTING AREA FOR A PERIOD OF ONE YEAR UNTIL THE END OF THE WARRANTY PERIOD. 2. WATER PLANTINGS AREAS BY THOROUGH SPRINKLING. PROVIDE AS NEEDED TO KEEP GROUND MOIST AND PLANTS HEALTHY. PREVENT SOIL EROSION. 3. PRUNE, CULTIVATE, FERTILIZE, SPRAY AND PERFORM OTHER NECESSARY OPERATIONS. .. Wices.~IJJ· 19807 NORTHCREEK PKWY N BOTHELL, WA 98011 OFFICE (425) 398-7600 = PROJECT INFORMATION: BENSON RD/CHURCH MP SE4663F 2640 BENSON RD RENTON, WA 98055 -ISSUED FOR: [I BUILDING PERMIT _ REVISION HISTORY: No_ DESCRIPTION: CHK. APPV. DATE: BY: BY: -- .- fA 811112005 REV. PER PRE-APP MEETING BJT ME ~ 81212005 ISSUED FOR BPS BJT MP ~ 712112005 ISSUED DESIGN REVIEW BJT ME I = PLANS PREPARED BY: B. J. THOMAS, P.E. 7607 80TH AVENE '. MARYSVILLE, WA 98270' 206';851 ;.;11 06 '-DRAWN BY: CHK. BY: = APPV. BY:- [,-------I _AAL-----'--_BJT --L.....-A------,M ~ r-LiCENSURE: ~ ........... , \. 'f_t!().4t ~ "9' -' ~ WAs" -1 <.l' ~ "rlt ~ ~ ~ E : fZ! y ~ ~ ~704~!fI • ~ .. lSrrc :S{(;m~ '-1'. I EXPIRES 08125/07 I ~EQUIPMENT: VOICE STREAM WIRELESS ANTENNAS LOCATED ON A 59'-11" AGL POLE WITH BTS EQUIPMENT IN AN EQUIPMENT SHELTER NEAR THE BASE OF THE MONOPOLE ~ DRAWING INFORMATION: DO NOT SCALE DRAWINGS, CONTRACTOR MUST VERIFY ALL DIMENSIONS AND ADVISE CONSULTANTS OF ANY ERRORS AND OMISSIONS, ALL PREVIOUS ISSUES OF THIS DRAWING ARE SUPERSEDED BYTHE LATEST REVISION, THE INFORMATION CONTAINED IN THIS SET OF DOCUMENTS IS PROPRIETARY BY NATURE, ANY USE OR DISCLOSURE OTHER THAN WHICH IS RELATED TO NAMED CLIENT IS STRICTLY PROHIBITED. ~ DRAWING TITLE: LANDSCAPE PLAN ~ DRAWING NUMBER: Of L· 1