Press Alt + R to read the document text or Alt + P to download or print.

No preview available

The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutLUA-05-161February 2006 Renton Lowe's Table of Contents I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I Figure 1 Figure 2 Figure 3 Figure 4 Figure 5 Figure 6 Figure 7 Table 1 Table 2 Table 3 Table 4 List of Figures Site Vicinity Map ..............................................................................................................5 Proposed Site Plan .............................................................................................................6 2005 Lane Configurations and Existing Traffic Conditions, Weekday PM Peak Hour .................................................................................................10 2007 Background Traffic Conditions,Weekday PM Peak Hour ....................................14 Estimated Trip Distribution Pattern.................................................................................17 Site-Generated Traffic,Weekday PM Peak Hour ...........................................................18 2007 Total Traffic Conditions,Weekday PM Peak Hour ...............................................19 List of Tables Existing Transportation Facilities and Roadway Designations.........................................9 Study Intersection Crash Histories, October 2002 -September 2005 .....................................................................................11 Esti mated Trip Generation ..............................................................................................16 2007 Total Traffic Conditions,Weekday PM Peak Hour Queuing Analyses............................................................................................................20 I Kittelson &Associates,Inc.ii | | | | | | Section 1 Executive Summary February 2006 Renton Lowe's Executive Summary I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I Executive Summary Lowe's HIW,inc.is proposing to de,elop a home improvement store to be located in the southeast quadrant of the Park Avenue/Garden Avenue intersection in Renton,Washington.The site is currently vacant and the proposed development plan calls for constructing a new Lowe's building on the north end of the site with a parking field located on the south side of the building. The proposed site plan includes the development of a Lowe's home improvement store with a 128,277 square-foot showroom/warehouse and a 29,676 square-foot garden center.Access to the site is proposed via two unsignalized driveways to Garden Avenue and an unsignalized service access for trucks on Houser Way.The north driveway on Garden Avenue would be located adjacent to the proposed home improvement store and the south driveway on Garden Avenue would be a shared access with the existing Fry's Electronics. To accommodate site development,it is recommended that on-site utilities,signing,landscaping, and vegetation be maintained to provide adequate intersection sight distance at the site-access driveways and adjacent intersections. The results of this study indicate development of the proposed Lowe's home improvement store can be accommodated while maintaining acceptable traffic operations and safety at the study intersections within the site vicinity.The following table documents the operations of the local study intersections with and without the proposed Lowe's. Year 2005 and 2007 Traffic Conditions Summary of Weekday PM Peak Hour Intersection Operational Analysis Findings Year 2007 Year 2005 Existing Background Year 2007 TotalTraffic(Without Site)(With Site) Intersection LOS V/C LOS V/C LOS V/C Signalized lntersecUon Park AveKarden Ave 8th St/Garden Ave D 0.75 D B 0.20 B Unsignalized Intersections* 0.78 ,D 0.21 B 0.79 0.34 Garden Ave/Proposed North Drwy -.--=-- Garden Ave/Proposed South Drwy B O.16 B 0.17 LOS:Level of Service V/C:Volume to Capacity Ratio•UnsignalizeO intersection minor street critical movement LOS and V/C ratio B 0.12 B 0.28 I Kittelson &Associates,Inc.2 | | ! | | | | ! ! ! ! | Section 2 Introduction February2006 Renton Lowe's Introduction I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I Introduction PROJECT DESCRIPTION Lowe's is proposing to develop a home improvement store on a plot of land located in the southeast quadrant of the Park Avenue/Garden Avenue intersection as illustrated in Figure 1.The site is currently vacant and is located immediately north of an existing Fry's Electronics store.The proposed development plan calls for constructing a new Lowe's building on the north end of the site with a parking field located on the south side of the building. The proposed site plan includes the development of a Lowe's home improvement store with a 128,277 square-foot showroom/warehouse and a 29,676 square-foot garden center.Access to the site is proposed via two driveways on Garden Avenue,one of which would be a shared driveway with the existing Fry's Electronics.An additional access for trucks is proposed to Houser Way on the north side of the store.Figure 2 illustrates the proposed site plan and access locations. Analysis Years To adequately assess the impacts of the proposed development,several study periods will be addressed for the project.Based on discussions with the project team,complete development is expected to occur in 2007.Given this time frame,the traffic study will evaluate year 2005 existing conditions,year 2007 background conditions (includes traffic conditions under expected regional traffic growth without site development),and year 2007 full build-out conditions (includes the background conditions as well as the expected traffic from the proposed Lowe's). SCOPE OF THE REPORT This analysis determines the transportation-related impacts associated with the proposed site development and was prepared in accordance with the requirements of the City of Renton.The study intersections and overall study area for this project were selected based on a review of the local transportation system and direction provided by City of Renton staff.These assumptions were summarized in the December 14,2005 scoping letter,which is included in Appendix "A". Operational analyses were performed for the following intersections under weekday p.m.peak hour conditions: •Park Avenue/Garden Avenue •8th Street/Garden Avenue •Garden Avenue/Proposed North Driveway •Garden Avenue/Proposed South Driveway (Fry's Electronics) This report addresses these transportation issues: •Year 2005 existing land use and transportation system conditions within the site vicinity; •Planned developments and transportation improvements in the study area; •Forecast year 2007 background traffic conditions during the weekday p.m.peak period; 41Klttelson&Associates,Inc. I Renton Lowe's February 2005 I (NO SCALE z ELECTRONICS J\/\/ \/-/ \/ t,,il®g L.-" SITE VICINITY MAP RENTON,WASHINGTON I Renton Lowe's February2006 /i/ /E/ ,S // 7i /"/" ,i ./j" z,..." J // \ ¢. \ \ \ \"\ \\ \E 'i \, •k P (NO SCALE \\ \ \ I PROPOSED SITE PLAN RENTON,WASHINGTON KITTELSON &ASSOCIATES,INC. TRAIRTATION PLANNING /TRAFFIC I=NCttlNEERING February 2006 Renton Lowe's Introduction I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I •Trip generation and distribution estimates for the proposed development; •Forecast year 2007 total traffic conditions with full build-out during the weekday p.m.peak period; •95th percentile queuing; •On-site traffic operations and circulation;and •Conclusions and recommendations. Kittelson &Associates,Inc.7 Section 3 Existing Conditions li I I I I I I I February 2006 Renton Lowe "s Existing Conditions I I I I I I I I I Existing Conditions The existing conditions analysis identifies site conditions and the current operational and geometric characteristics of roadways within the study area.The site of the proposed Lowe's home improvement store was visited and inventoried in October 2005.At that time,information was collected regarding site conditions,adjacent land uses,existing traffic operations,and transportation facilities in the study area. SITE CONDITIONS AND ADJACENT LAND USES The site is currently vacant and is bordered by Park Avenue to the north,Garden Avenue to the west,and railroad tracks to the east.The site is located north of and adjacent to an existing Fry's Electronics Store on Garden Avenue.Adjacent land uses include some commercial businesses to the north and south,industrial uses to the east,and vacant property to the west. TRANSPORTATION FACILITIES This section describes the existing roadway,pedestrian,bicycle,and transit facilities in the site vicinity. Roadway Facilities Table l provides a summary of the roadway facilities within the study area.Figure 3 identifies the location of the study intersections as well as the existing lane configurations and traffic control devices at the study intersections. Table 1 Existing Transportation Facilities and Roadway Designations I I Roadway Park Avenue Garden Avenue N 8 Street Classification Speed Limit Side-Bicycle walks Lanes Yes On-Street Perking Principal Artedal 35 No No Minor Arterial 25 Yes No No Minor Arterial 25 Yes No No I I I I I I TRAFFIC VOLUMES AND PEAK HOUR OPERATIONS Manual turning movement counts were conducted at the study intersections during the weekday evening (4:00 -6:00 p.m.)peak period in December of 2005.From these counts,it was detenmned that the weekday p.m.peak hour of travel on the adjacent street system occurs between 4:30 and 5:30 p.m.The turning movement counts from the weekday p.m.peak hour were summarized and rounded to the nearest five vehicles as shown in Figure 3.Appendix "'B"contains the traffic count sheets used in this study. Current Traffic Operations All level-of-service analyses described in this report were performed in accordance with the procedures stated in the 2000 Highway Capacity Manual (1).A description of level of service and the criteria by which they are determined is presented in Appendix "C."Appendix "C"also indicates how level ofservice is measured and what is generally considered the acceptable range of level ofservice. I Kittelson &Associates,Inc.9 II Renton Lowe's February 2006 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I o u. (NO SCALE) \ LANE CONFIGURATION EXISTING TRAFFIC LANE CONFIGURATION EXISTING TRAFFIC CM=WB /'\ LOS=B V/C=0.16 LANE CONFIGURATION EXISTING TRAFFIC FRY'S ELECTRONICS 125(1,250) (2,150)215 ,---lb..N 8TH ST (1,000)100 -'- 2005 EXISTING TRAFFIC CONTROL,GEOMETRIC AND OPERATIONWEEKDAYPMPEAKHOUR&WEEKDAY DAILY TRAFFICRENTON,WASHINGTON !KELJO ,SOC,ASNC February 2006 Renton Lowe's Existing Conditions I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I The peak 15-minute flow rate during the weekday p.m.peak hour was used in the evaluation of all intersection levels of service to ensure that this analysis was based on a reasonable worst-case scenario.For this reason,the analysis reflects conditions that are only likely to occur for 15 minutes out of each average peak hour.Traffic conditions during all other weekday hours will likely operate under better conditions than those described in this report. Level-of-service analyses for the signalized intersections discussed in this report are based on the average control delay per vehicle entering the intersection.The City of Renton requires that the proposed development maintain the same level of service that would be anticipated in the horizon year if the site were not developed,unless the horizon year level is at level of service "C"or better. If the intersection operates at level of service "C"or better in the horizon year,no improvements are needed. The intersection level of service and volume-to-capacity ratio was calculated for each of the study intersections using the weekday p.m.peak hour traffic volumes.As indicated in Figure 3,all study intersections currently operate acceptably.Appendix "D"includes the 2005 existing traffic operations worksheets. CRASH ANALYSIS Crash history at the study intersections was reviewed in an effort to identify potential intersection safety issues.Crash records were obtained from the City of Renton for the three most recent years (October 2002 -September 2005).A summary of the crash data is provided in Table 2 that includes the type of crashes and severity over the three-year analysis period.Crash rates for the study intersections,expressed in crashes per million entering vehicles (MEV),were also calculated for evaluation purposes and are shown in Table 2. Intersection Park Ave/Garden Ave #of Crashes 12 8"St/Garden Ave 3 3arden Ave/Proposed OnNy 1 MEV -Million Entering Vehicles PDO -Property Damage Only Table 2 Study Intersection Crash Histories (October 2002 -September 2005) Crash Type SeverityCrashRate (crashes/Rear Side-Right FixedMEV)End swipe Angle )bject PDO Injury Fatal 0.45 6 2 4 0 9 3 0 0.57 0 0 2 1 2 1 0 0.19 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 As shown in Table 2,the total number of crashes and crash rates are relatively low at these intersections.There does not appear to be a consistent crash pattern to tie the data to any existing traffic control or geometric deficiencies.Therefore,no safety improvements are recommended at this time.The crash data records are included in Appendix "'E". 11Kittelson&Associates,Inc. Section 4 Transportation Impact Analysis .+. i¸ i I ] February 2006 Renton Lowe's Transportation ImpactAnalysis I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I Transportation Impact Analysis The transportation impact analysis identifies how the study area's transportation system will operate in the year the proposed development will be fully built-out.The impact of the traffic generated by the proposed development during the typical weekday p.m.peak hour was examined as outlined below. •Background weekday p.m.peak hour traffic conditions for the year 2007 were analyzed. An annual growth rate was applied to existing traffic volumes to account for regional growth in the site vicinity. •Future daily and weekday p.m.peak hour site-generated trips were estimated for buildout of the site. •A trip distribution pattern was derived through a review of existing traffic volumes,local transportation facilities,and surrounding development patterns. •Predicted site-generated traffic was added to the background traffic volumes to evaluate total traffic operations at the study area intersections during the weekday p.m.peak hour for year 2007 conditions. •A 95th percentile vehicular queuing analysis and turn-lane warrant analysis was performed under year 2007 conditions. •On-site circulation was reviewed and evaluated. 2007 BACKGROUND TRAFFIC CONDITIONS The 2007 background traffic analysis identifies how the study area's transportation system,will operate in the year the proposed Lowe's home improvement store is expected to open.This analysis includes traffic growth due to general growth in the region,but does not include traffic from the proposed development. Planned Developments and Transportation Improvements Based on discussions with city staff at the pre-application conference on October 20,2005,no planned developments or transportation improvements were identified for inclusion in the transportation impact analysis. Traffic Volumes Year 2007 background traffic volumes were developed by applying a two percent annual growth rate to the existing 2005 traffic volumes at the study intersections.This growth factor was developed based on a review of existing growth trends at the study intersections and was approved by city staff.Figure 4 illustrates the resulting forecast year 2007 background traffic volumes for the weekday p.m.peak hour. Kittelson &Associates,Inc.13 Renton Lowe's Februaq/2006 I I I I (NO SCALE) \ SITE FRY'S ELECTRONICS 13o(1,3ool (2,2O0)220 -N 8TH ST (1,000)100 ---I 2007 BACKGROUND TRAFFIC CONDmONS WEEKDAY PM PEAK HOUR &WEEKDAY DALLY TRAFFIC RENTON,WASHINGTON I KrrTELSON &ASSOCIATES,INC February 2006 Renton Lowe's Transportation ImpactAnalysis I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I Level of Service Analysis An operational analysis was conducted at each study intersection using the forecast weekday p.m. peak hour turning movement volumes shown in Figure 4 to determine the 2007 background traffic levels of service and volume-to-capacity ratios.As indicated in the figure,all study intersections are forecast to operate acceptably.Appendix "'F"includes the 2007 background traffic operations worksheets. PROPOSED DLme't=LOPMENT PLAN Lowe's is proposing to develop a home improvement store on a vacant plot of land located in the southeast quadrant of the Park Avenue/Garden Avenue intersection.The proposed development plan calls for constructing a new Lowe's home improvement store with a 128,277 square-foot showroom/warehouse and a 29,676 square-foot garden center on the north end of the site with a parking field located on the south side of the building.Access to the site is proposed via two driveways on Garden Avenue.The north driveway would be located adjacent to the home improvement store and the south driveway would be a shared access with the existing Fry's Electronics.A service driveway for trucks is proposed on the north side of the store to Houser Way.Figure 2 illustrates the proposed site plan and access locations. Trip Generation Estimates of weekday daily and weekday p.m.peak hour vehicle trip ends for the proposed development were calculated from empirical observations at other similar developments.These observations were obtained from the standard reference manual,Trip Generation;7th Edition, published by the Institute of Transportation Engineers (2). A percentage of trips generated by this land use can be classified as pass-by trips (trips currently on the adjacent roadways that would be drawn to the new development)as well as internal trips (trips generated to the other retail uses within the development that result in one joint trip to the site).To quantify the impact of these pass-by and internal trips,reduction factors for this land use was obtained from the Trip Generation Handbook (3).The Trip Generation Handbook identifies an internal trip rate of 20 percent from retail to retail land uses.However,for a conservative approach, a five percent internalization rate was deemed appropriate for this development to account for trips between Lowe's and the Fry's Electronics store. In addition to the internalization rate,the Trip Generation Handbook also identifies an average pass-by rate of 48 percent for home improvement stores during the weekday p.m.peak hour. However,given the limited number of samples (three),and the existing traffic volumes on Garden Avenue,a pass-by rate of 15 percent was assumed for the proposed home improvement store. Table 3 summarizes the estimated site trip generation during a typical weekday as well as during the weekday p.m.peak hour.(All trip ends shown in Table 3 have been rounded to the nearest five trips). i Kittelson &Associates,Inc.15 February2006 Renton Lowe "s Transportation ImpactAnalysis Table 3 Estimated Trip Generation Weekday PM Peak Hour TripsI I I Land Use -Iome Improvement Superstore ITE Code Size (sq.ft.)Daily THps 862 158,549 4,725* Intemal Trips (5%) Pass-by TEps (15%) qet New Trips (235) (675) ,=__,=;.'-3,815 Total In Out 390**185 205 (20)(10)(10) (50)(25)(25) 320 150 170 I I I I I I I I I I I I I *Estimated based on average trip generation rate of 29.8 trips/ksf**Estimated based on average trip rate of 2.45 trips/ksf As shown in Table 3,the proposed development site is estimated to generate 3,815 net new weekday daily trips.Approximately 320 trips (150 inbound,170 outbound)will occur during the weekday p.m.peak hour. Trip Distribution and Assignment The distribution of site-generated trips onto the study area roadway system was estimated based on a review of the existing transportation facilities,existing peak hour directional travel characteristics, and surrounding development patterns.Figure 5 depicts the estimated trip distribution pattern for the proposed development. Based on the trip distribution estimate,Figure 6 illustrates the projected site-generated traffic volumes at the study intersections during the average weekday p.m.peak hour. 2007 TOTAL TRAFFIC CONDITIONS The total traffic conditions analysis forecasts how the study area's transportation system will operate once the proposed Lowe's home improvement store is complete.The 2007 background traffic volumes for the weekday p.m.hour shown in Figure 4 were added to the site-generated traffic shown in Figure 6 to arrive at the total traffic volumes shown in Figure 7. Intersection Operations Figure 7 provides a summary of the forecast total traffic levels of service and volume-to-capacity analyses associated with full build-out for the proposed Lowe's home improvement store.As shown in the figure,the total traffic analysis indicates that all of the study intersections are forecast to continue to operate acceptably during the weekday P.m.hour conditions.In addition,all study intersections will maintain the same level of service in year 2007 with or without the proposed development as required by the City of Renton.Appendix "G"includes the 2007 total traffic operations worksheets. I Kittelson &Associates,Inc.16 Febma2006 SITE FRY'S ELECTRONICS N 8TH ST (NO SCALE) ESTIMATED TRIP DISTRIBUTION PATrERN RENTON,WASHINGTON Kn-[ELSON &ASSOCIATES,INC. TRANSPORTA11ON PLANIN G/TRAFFIC EteGINRING Renton Lowe's February2006I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I 8 8 LL \ (NO SCALE) Z SITE FRY'S ELECTRONICS 75(860)-<...--5(95) (860)70 .N 8TH ST -(95)10 XXS:WEEKDAY:PM P-EAK HE)UR i I (XX)):WgEKDAY DAtLY ,TRAEFIC !!1 SITE-GENERATED TRIPSWEEKDAYPMPEAKHOUR&WEEKDAY DAILY TRAFFICRENTON,WASHINGTON Renton Lowe's February2006 P I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I o tL :SITE ELECTRONICS 150(2,16O) ....•----•-• N 8TH ST (1,095)110 (NO SCALE) 2007 TOTAL TRAFFIC CONDITIONSWEEKDAYPMPEAKHOUR&WEEKDAY DALLY TRAFFIC RENTON,WASHINGTON KITTELSON &ASSOCIATES,INC. .¢ISPORTATONPLANNING JTRAFFIC EN(NEERING February2006 Renton Lowe's Transportation ImpactAnalysis I I I I I I Queuing Analysis Using the 2007 total traffic volumes shown in Figure 7,a queuing analysis was performed at the study intersections to ensure that adequate vehicle storage will be available along Garden Avenue and at the site driveways upon full site build-out. For the queuing analysis conducted at the signalized intersections,a Poisson distribution was applied at a 95 percent confidence level to determine queue length probabilities.In essence,random arrivals were assumed and the queue lengths shown will not be exceeded during 95 percent of the signal cycles.The assumed length-of-red interval was obtained from the signal timing parameters used in the total traffic level of service analysis and one vehicle was assumed to occupy 25 feet. For the unsignalized driveway queuin analyses,equation 17-37 from the 2000 High{ray Capacity Manual was used to calculate the 95 -percentile queue lengths during the peak 15-minute period and one vehicle was assumed to occupy 25 feet.Table 4 summarizes the results of the unsignalized queuing analyses. Table 4 2007 Total Traffic Condltlons,Weekday PM Peak Hour Queuing Analyses I I I I Adequate 95m-Percentile Available Storage IntersecUon Movement Queue Length Storage Available? Park Avenue/Garden Avenue Northbound Right-turn 150'450'Yes 8n Street/Garden Avenue Southbound Left-Through 75'>300'Yes Southbound Right-turn 150'>300'Yes Garden Avenue/Southbound Len-Through 25'>100'Yes Westbound Left-Through 25'25'Yes Proposed North Driveway Westbound Fight 25'25'Yes Garden Avenue/Southbound Left-Through 25'>100'Yes Proposed South Driveway Westbound Left-Through-Right 50'125'Yes I I I I I I I As shown in Table 4,adequate storage is available for all 95th percentile queues on Garden Avenue at each of the study intersections.Appendix "H"contains the 2007 queuing analysis worksheets. Sight Distance Field observations indicate that adequate sight distance is provided along the site frontage.In order to maintain safe and efficient on-and off-site circulation,it is recommended that future vegetation and landscaping be maintained at the proposed site-access driveways to provide drivers with adequate sight distance to view oncoming drivers. On-Site Circulation Internal circulation was evaluated as part of this study to ensure that the site provides sufficient on- site circulation to accommodate pedestrian movements and internal site traffic.Kittelson & Associates,Inc.worked with the project's development team to enhance the operational and safety aspects of the proposed site-access driveway,on-site circulation,and parking.Specific issues addressed include providing adequate throat depth for queue stacking at driveways and a review of on-site truck circulation.The proposed site plan has been refined,using the information from this analysis,to meet the needs of both pedestrian and vehicular traffic.Appendix "1"depicts the proposed truck circulation route through the site. Kittelson &Associates,Inc.20 Section 5 Conclusions and Recommendations February 2006RentonLowe"s Conclusions and Recommendations I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I Conclusions and Recommendations Based on the results of the transportation impact analysis,the proposed Lowe's can be developed. while maintaining acceptable levels of service and safety on the surrounding transportation system. The analysis yielded the following findings and recommendations. FINDINGS Existing Conditions •All study intersections currently operate acceptably during the weekday p.m.peak hour. Year 2007 Background Traffic Conditions •Year 2007 background traffic volumes were estimated assuming two years of continued local and regional growth. •All of the study intersections are forecast to operate acceptably during weekday p.m.peak hour conditions. Proposed Development Activities •The proposed site plan includes the development of a Lowe's home improvement store with a 128,277 square-foot showroom/warehouse and a 29,676 square-foot garden center.Access to the site is proposed via two driveways on Garden Avenue,one of which would be a shared driveway with the existing Fry's Electronics.A service driveway for truck deliveries is proposed to Houser Way on the north side of the store. •The proposed development site is estimated to generate approximately 3,815 net new weekday daily trips or which approximately 320 trips (150 inbound,170 outbound)will occur during the weekday p.m.peak hour. Year 2007 Total Traffic Conditions ••All of the study intersections are forecast to continue to operate acceptably during weekday p.m. peak hour conditions. •The queuing analysis reveals that adequate storage will be available for all 95th percentile queues on Garden Avenue during the weekday p.m.peak hour. •Field observations indicate that adequate sight distance is provided along the site frontage. •The site plan was refined to provide sufficient site circulation to accommodate pedestrian movements and internal site traffic. RECOMMENDATIONS Based on the results of the analysis summarized in this report,it is recommended that on-site utilities,signing,landscaping,and vegetation be maintained to provide adequate intersection sight distance at the site-access driveways and adjacent intersections as part of site development.No additional off-site transportation improvements are recommended. I Kittelson &Associates,Inc.22 Section 6 References ih.1t ,J ii ,•. L • ! ! ! ! ! February2006 Renton Lowe"s References I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I References 1.Transportation Research Board.Highway Capacity Manual,2000. 2.Institute of Transportation Engineers.ITE Trip Generation Manual,Seventh Edition.2003. 3.Institute of Transportation Engineers.ITE Trip Generation Handbook,Second Edition.June 2004. I Kittelson &Associates,Inc.24 I I I I I KITTELSON &ASSOCIATES,INC. TRANSPORTATION PLANNING/TRAFFIC ENGINEERING 610 SW ALDER.SUITE 700 •PORTLAND.OR 97205 •(503)228-5230 •FAX (503)273-8169 MEMORANDUM Date:December 14,2005 Project #:7662.01 I I I I I To: From: cc: Project: Subject: Jan lllian,City of Renton Jerilyn Wen and Marc Butorac,P.E. Jim Manion,Lowe's HIW,Inc. Steve Pesce,PacLand Paul Manzer,PacLand Bill Fortunato,PacLand Anthony Yi,Kittelson &Associates,Inc. Renton Lowe's Preliminary Traffic Assessment I I I I I I I I I This memorandum summarizes the scope of work items associated with conducting a transportation impact analysis (TIA)for the proposed Renton Lowe's project as discussed at the October 20,2005 Pre-Application Conference.In addition,the existing traffic operations at the identified study intersections are also provided. Proposed Development Plan Lowe's is proposing to develop a home improvement store on a plot of land located in the southeast quadrant of the Park Avenue/Garden Avenue intersection as illustrated in Figure 1. The site is currently vacant and is located adjacent to an existing Fry's Electronics store.The proposed development plan calls for constructing a new Lowe's building on the north end of the site with a parking field located on the south side of the building. The proposed site plan includes the development of a Lowe's home improvement store with a 128,277 square-foot showroom/warehouse and a 29,712 square-foot garden center.Access to the site is proposed via a shared driveway on Garden Avenue with the existing Fry's Electronics. Figure 2 illustrates the proposed site plan and access location. FILENAME:H:proj file7662.Rtmttm Lowe'spetlg\7662 SOW D¢cO5do¢ I Renton Lowe's December2005 .I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I Z \// \/\//\/ jj// SITE VICINITY MAP RENTON,WASHINGTON KITTELSON &ASSOCIATES,INC. AIO fqTATION pLAN hK3/TpFF *G JlEEK (NO SCALE I I Renton Lowe's December2005 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I // /J/ /J / \ \ J \ (NO SCALE) \ I \ \\ / \ \\ \\ \ \ PROPOSED SITE PLANRENTON,WASHINGTON KITTELSON &ASSOCIATES,INC, RXpORTAnCI pINING ITRAFFIC I I I Renton Lowe "s December 14,2005 Project #:7662.01 Page 4 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I Analysis Year To adequately assess the impacts of the proposed development,several study periods will be addressed for the project.Based on discussions with the project team,complete development is expected to occur in 2007.Given this time frame,the traffic study will evaluate year 2005 existing conditions,year 2007 background conditions (includes traffic conditions under expected regional traffic growth without site development),and year 2007 full build-out conditions (includes the background conditions as well as the expected traffic from the proposed Lowe's and other in-process developments in the site vicinity). Study Intersections The following study intersections were identified by city staff at the October 20,2005 pre- application meeting for analysis: •Park Avenue/Lake Washington Boulevard-Garden Avenue e 8th Street/Garden Avenue •Garden Avenue/Proposed Driveway (Fry's Electronics) Design Hour Within each of the identified analysis years,specific emphasis will be placed on those time periods that experience the highest degree of adjacent roadway travel.Based on information provided by Lowe's,peak retail activity,which includes employees and customers,occurs during the weekday p.m.peak hours.Based on this information,an average weekday p.m.peak hour historically represents a "reasonable worst case"study time period in terms of traffic levels on the surrounding transportation network. Growth Rate To account for regional and local traffic growth within the site vicinity,a growth rate will be applied to existing traffic volumes to estimate future year 2007 traffic volumes.The growth rate will be developed from the model volumes used in the Boeing Renton Comprehensive Plan Amendment EIS (prepared by Transportation Engineering NorthWest,LLC,June 30,2003). Trip Generation Estimates of weekday daily and weekday p.m.peak hour vehicle trip ends for the proposed development were calculated from empirical observations at other similar developments.These observations were obtained from the standard reference manual,Trip Generation,7th Edition, published by the Institute of Transportation Engineers (1). I Kittelson &Associates,Inc.Portland,Oregon I I Renton Lowe "s December 14,2005 Project #."7662.01 Page 5 I I I I I I I A percentage of trips generated by these land uses can be classified as pass-by trips (trips currently on the adjacent roadways that would be drawn to the new development)as well as internal trips (trips generated to the other retail uses within the development that result in one joint trip to the site).To quantify the impact of these pass-by and internal trips,reduction factors for these land uses were obtained from the Trip Generation Handbook (2).The Trip Generation Handbook identifies an internal trip rate of 20 percent from retail to retail land uses.However, for a conservative approach,a five percent internalization rate was deemed appropriate for this development to account for trips between Lowe's and the Fry's Electronic store. In addition to the internalization rate,the Trip Generation Handbook also identifies an average pass-by rate of 48 percent for home improvement stores during the weekday p.m.peak hour. However,given the limited number of samples (three),and the existing traffic volumes on Garden Avenue,a pass-by rate of 15 percent was assumed for the proposed home improvement store. Table 1 summarizes the estimated site trip generation during a typical weekday as well as during the weekday p.m.peak hour.(All trip ends shown in Table 1 have been rounded to the nearest five trips). Table 1 Esnrnated Trip Generation I I I I I I I I I ITE Size Land Use Code (sq.ft.):Dally Trips Home Improvement Superstore 862 157,989 4,710 Internal Trips (5)&)(235) Pa-by rrips (15)(870) Net New Trips 3,805 Weekday PM Peak Hour Trips Total In Out 385 180 205 (20)(10)(10) (50)(25)(25) 315 145 170 As shown in Table 1,the proposed development site is estimated to generate 3,805 net new weekday daily trips.Approximately 315 trips (145 inbound,170 outbound)will occur during the weekday p.m.peak hour. Trip Distribution and Assignment The distribution of site-generated trips onto the study area roadway system was estimated based on a review of the existing transportation facilities,existing peak hour directional travel characteristics,and surrounding development patterns.Figure 3 depicts the estimated trip distribution pattern for the proposed development. Based on the trip distribution estimate,Figure 3 also illustrates the projected site-generated traffic volumes at the study intersections during the average weekday p.m.peak hour. I Kittelson &Associates,Inc.Portland,Oregon I Renton Lowe's December20(, I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I ESTIMATED TRIP DiSTHiBUTION AND SITE-GENERATED TRIPS WEEKDAY PM PEAK HOUR RENTON,WASHINGTON KnTELSON &ASSOCIATES,INC. (NO SCALE I I I Renton Lowe's December 14,2005 Project #:7662.01 Page 7 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I We trust this memorandum provides adequate documentation of the proposed development plan, estimated trip generation,and study intersections for inclusion in the Renton Lowe's transportation impact analysis.In addition,we formally request that the City of Renton provide written confirmation regarding the proposed project assumptions and methodology as soon as possible so that we can proceed with our analysis.If you have any questions,please give us a call at (503)228-5230. References: 1.Institute ofTransportation Engineers.Trip Generation,7th Edition.2003. 2.Institute ofTransportation Engineers.Trip Generation Handbook,2nd Edition.2004. I Kittelson &Associates.Inc.Portland,Oregon Appendix B Traffic Count Data I INTERSECTION:Gardl Ave-/Lake Wash/ngton Dr-START TIME:4:00PM PROJECTID#:Rton END TIME:6"00PM QCJOB#:10131701 DATE:124Y2005I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I PEAK HOUR TURNING MOVEMENTS PEAK HOUR UNK VOLUMES 5MI NUTE COUNT PERIOD BEGINNING AT 4:00 PM 4:(]6 PM 4:10 PM 4:15 PM 4:20 PM 4::2;5 PM 4:30 PM 4:35 PM 4:40 PM 4:45 PM 4:50 PM 4:55 PM 5:00 PM 5:G6 PM 5:10 PM 5:15 PM 5:20 PM 55 PM 5:30 PM 5:35 PM 5:40PM 5:45 PM 5:50 PM 5:55 PM HOURLY TOTALS 4:00 PM 4:15 PM 4:313 pM 4:45 PM 5:00 PM 242 --#L 60 2 PHF TOTAl. 70Q ----b"P9 HV=3% 15 --1 --113 959 -I F -I z PEAK HOUR:r 4:45PM ••TO .5:45 PM • GardenAve- (Sobo.d) Rllht Thru Left 20 0 3 18 2 1 16 0 8 15 0 1 19 0 3 14 0 5 13 0 11 17 0 7 19 0 7 27 0 3 27 0 6 15 0 333O5 24 0 1 20 0 10 24 0 5 17 0 7 32 0 8 23 0 2 22 0 8 19 0 3 23 0 5 15 0 4 33 0 5 Southbound Lake WashlngtonDr- Right Thru Leh Right Thru left 220 2 58 243 0 62 768 0 73 283.o 61_285 0 63 852 HV--4% 1061 PEAK 15MINUT1ES:4*ASPM!. Garden Ave-Lake Washington--(Noctllbound)(d) RIM Thru Left Rllht Thru Left OIJALITY 1¢Z:>W AVINlt.le,]'p 105 "Rgafd,OR 97224 PhOn6:503-620-4242 Fax:503 e120-4545 small:wOqua.tycounts.net PEAK HOUR PED CROSSING VOLUMES 0 o o 0 Crosswalk Usage (PedsBy @p'oach} North East South West TOTAL Velt Peds 13 65 9 4 54 17 5 70 12 7 64 17 2 47 26 3 38 22 7 47 11 5 53 8 9 48 10 10 72 0 4 62 7 I 66 13 •6 41 108726 5 61 10 2 52 14 7 54 12 4 53 10 3 44 8 4 6O 5 5 42 12 7 39 19 3 64 10 2 45 11 Westbound 35 0 0 1 54 31 0 0 0 58 14 0 0 0 71 28 0 0 0 55 26 0 0 1 45 20 0 0 2 47 27 0 0 O 52 23 0 0 0 62 30 0 0 1 53 22 0 O I 71 29 0 0 1 71 33 0 0 O 46 27 0 0 O 48 30 0 0 0 56 31 0 0 2 53 20 0 0 1 57 18 0 0 1 62 20 0 0 3 63 22 0 0 4 48 29 0 0 2 64 17 0 0 0 63 24 O 0 3 59 16 29 O 0 0 38 21 22 0 0 1 58 17 NOrthbOund EasSund RkJht lhru LeR 70 686 158 68 671 146 69 681 117 679.11357127 10 O 0 O 0 10 0 0 0 0 10 O 0 O 0 19 0 0 O O 12 0 0 O 0 17 0 0 O 0 17 0 0 0 0 16 0 0 0 0 12 0 O 0 0 17 0 O 0 0 13 0 0 0 0 20 0 O 0 0 25 0 0 0 0 11 0 0 0 0 17 0 0 0 0 17 0 0 0 0 26 0 0 O 0 17 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 20 0 0 0 0 25 O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O O Pedestrians By Approach 210 195 2O6 2O6 181 168 185 191 189 229 22O 197 195 2O8 210 192 2O4 210 188 214186 195184 194 Rkjht "lru 318 0 326 0 310 0 298 0 289 0 Left Right Thru Left 0 7 685 173 0 8 659 196 0 10 694 206 o 75 7 242:0 17 669 246 West East North South 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O :.0 0 0 O 0 0 0 0 TOTAL Veh Peds 2377 O 2379 0 2430 O 2453 0 2380 0 Ver'Jon 3=! I I I I INTERSECTION:Gardefl Ave-Dn'veway--START TIME:4:00 PM I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I 5-MINUTE COUNT PERIOD BEGINNING AT 4:00 PM 4:05 PM 4:10 PM 4:15 PM 4:20 PM 4:25 PM 4:30 PM 4:35 PM 4:40 PM 4:45 PM 4:50 PM 4:55 PM 5:00 PM 5:05 PM 5:10PM 5:15 PM 5:20 PM 5:25 PM 5:30PM 5:35 PM 5:40PM 5:45 PM 5:50 PM 5:55 PM HOURLY TOTALS 4:00 PM 4:15 PM 4:30 PM 4:45 PM 5:00 PM PROJECT |D#:Rlmtorl OC ,lOB #:;'0131702 PEAK HOUR TURNING MOVEMENTS END "nMEJ 6"00 PM DATE:12JI2G05 PEAK HOUR LINK VOLUMES O L 116 0 139 P TOT O----O == 0 7 F 0 BIF =l PEAK HOUR::4:15 PM':TO,/:I: Garden Ave--DHvew'a,/-- (so.mo.nd)(woun)Right Thru Left Right Thru Left PEAK 15 MINUTES:F -'4:15 PML!i-TO Ave- (Nocthbound)(Eastbound) Right Thru Left Right Thru Left Q3 T]gard,OR 97224 Phone:,503-620-4242 Fax:503 620-4545 emalI:FwOqualcoums.net PEAKIIOUR PED CROSGIHO VOLUMES 0 °l I° 0 Crosswalk Usage (Peds By Approach) North East South TOTAL West Veh Peds 0 9 7 12 0 0 4 7 8 0 0 3 9 4 0 0 5 11 10 O 0 9 11 10 O 0 14 6 11 0 0 I 11 6 0 0 6 5 8 O 0 5 8 11 0 0 5 5 8 0 0 4 3 12 0 0 5 9 8 0 0 1 10 16 0 0 2 5 8 0 O 7 6 8 0 0 7 5 7 0 0 8 3 7 0 0 7 6 3 0 0 9 3 8 0 0 7 2 6 0 0 4 6 6 0 O 6 13 11 0 O 4 7 16 0 O 3 7 11 O Southbound westbound Right 111ru Left Right Thru 0 72 g2 108 0 O 66 9().::;i1 .:,().O 59 76 10 0 0 67 63 97 0 O 65 73 107 0 1 2 27 3 0 13 4 0 15 2 O 17 3 0 13 3 1 13 O 1 1 14 0 3 1 21 O 3 0 16 0 4 2 16 0 2 1 16 O 1 1 20 O 0 2 17 O 1 0 27 0 0 0 19 0 0 0 16 0 2 0 11 0 1 0 18 0 0 0 17 0 1 0 18 0 3 0 16 0 O 0 17 0 2 1 15 0 4 2 9 0 Norbound O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Eastbound 0 0 0 0 0 0 O 0 O 0 0 0 O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O 0 0 0 O 0 0 0 O 0 O 0 0 0 0 0 0 O 0 O 0 O 0 O 0 0 0 O 0 O 0 O 0 O O 0 0 O 0 O O O 0 O 0 O 0 O 0 O O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O 0 0 0 PedesblmlsBy Approach 0 58 0 35 0 35 O 46 0 46 0 48 0 34 0 44 0 43 O 41 O 38 O 44 0 46 O 43 O 40 O 35 0 31 O 35 3734 35 4745 36 LeA Right Thru 30 9 201 18 5 211 15 6 211 14 5 200 LeR Rlht Thru 0 0 0bo-o000 0 0 0 0 0 0 Left West O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 East North South O 0 O O :0 O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 TOTAL Veh Peds 512 0 513 0 474 O 459 0 464 0 Version3.1 I I I I [NTIERSECllON:Garden Aw-/Bth-- I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I 5-MINUTE COUNT PERIOD BEGINNING AT 4:00PM 4:05 PM 4:10 PM 4:15 PM 4:20PM 45 PM 4:30 PM 4:35 PM 4:40PM 4:45 PM 4:50 PM 4:55 PM 5:00 PM 5:PM 5:10 PM 5:t0 PM 5:20 PM 5:25 PM 5:30 PM 5:35 PM 5:40 PM 5:45 PM 5:50 PM 5:55 PM HOURLYTOTALS 4:00 PM:"- 4:15 PM 4:30 PM 4:45 PM 5:00PM PROJECT ID#: OC JOB m:10131703 PEAKHOUR TURNING MOVEMENTS --J 1 L 145 J PRF 2 --7 f r PEAK HOUR:".4:00 PM, TO' 5:00 PM !. Garden Ave-- Right Thru Left 10 0 1 10 0 3 10 0 3 15 0 O 8 0 3 7 0 3 6 0 3 4 0 2 9 I 5 12 0 5 6 0 0 0 0 0 6 "0 2 3 0 5 7 0 3 11 0 5 6 0 2 12 0 8 3 0 1 7 0 2 6 0 1 5 0 I 6 0 3 0 0 3 Southbound R]cJht Thru Left 83 1 31 82 1 4O 79 0 34 78 0 36 L.89 53 p o START TIME:4:00PM END'rIME O:OO PM DATE:12/'200 PEAK HOUR LINK VOLUMES m 154 HV=7% 211 L__'i > 142 TOTAL HV=4% 89 X PEAK 15 MINUTES:.5:ToPM .[5:15PM.I 1]gad,OR 97224 mail:Jrw@qualitycoLmts. PEAK HOUR PEO CROSSING VOLUMES 0 ,I@I0 8U1-- I Right Thru Left 12 5 6 9 8 6 10 3 4 3 8 4 8 7 7 7 7 5 10 4 9 0 0 0 11 0 15 2 6 2 7 4 8 1 7 6 7 4 7 3 7 4 8 2 9 1 5 3 Westbound O O O O O 0 0 0 0 0 O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Northbound Right Thru Left 95 47 0 94 39 5 97 41 0 Garde Ave- (No,bo,,,,d) RIQht Thru Left 0 0 1 1 3 0 0 1 0 1 1 0 5 1 O 3 0 0 10 0 0 7 0 0 6 0 0 7 0 1 1 0 0 9 0 0 8 0 0 0 O 0 2 0 0 7 0 0 6 0 0 3 0 0 7 0 0 4 O 0 5 0 0 3 O 0 1 0 0 5 0 0 7 0 0 2 Eas0und RkJht Thru 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 1 0 0 8th- Rklht Thru Left North 17 0 1 0 0 15 0 0 1 0 11 0 1 0 0 14 0 0 0 0 9 0 0 0 1 20 0 0 0 0 11 0 1 0 O 16 0 1 0 O 11 0 0 0 0 11 0 1 0 1 14 0 3 0 I 0 0 0 0 0 17 0 0 0 0 17 0 0 0 0 19 O 0 0 0 10 0 0 0 0 16 0 0 0 0 14 1 0 0 0 14 1 0 0 0 15 2 0 0 0 13 0 0 0 0 14 3 0 0 0 12 0 0 0 0 14 0 0 O 0 Pedeslmls By Approach Left Right Thru Left West Est North South 4 2 :60 149 0 "8 1"'.3 1 1 66 159 0 6 0 3 0 1 60 156 I 5 0 2 0 0 55 160 4 4 S 2 0 0 52 175 7 0 0 0 CrosswalkUsage East South West TOTAL Veh Peals 5O 1 45 1 44 1 45 0 37 1 49 0 41 1 43 1 41 0 52 2 37 4 0 O 47 0 49 0 43 0 40 0 40 0 51 1341 37 2 32 0 35 3 38 0 33 0 TOTAL Veh Peds 485.12 ¸ 485 9 484 9 462 10 470 7 I I I Appendix C ,n of Level-of-Service Methods and Criteria I1 IJ Ir m m I ! ! ! | January2006 Renton Lowe's Appendix C I I I I I I I Appendix C Level of Service Concept Level of service (LOS)is a concept developed by traffic engineers to gauge the overall quality of the travel experience through an intersection or roadway segment as it is perceived by the traveler. Six categories are used to denote the various levels of service,which range from A to F.I Signalized Intersections At signalized intersections,level of service is defined by a single performance measure:average control delay per vehicle.Control delay is defined to include initial deceleration delay,queue move- up time,stopped delay,and final acceleration delay.Table C1 provides a qualitative description of each LOS category as it applies to signalized intersections,and Table C2 identifies the average control delay threshold point used as the boundary for each LOS category.LOS thresholds for the specific reviewing jurisdiction(s)are described in the body of the report. Table C1 Level of Service Definitions (Signalized Intersections) Level of Service Average Delay per Vehicle A Very low average control delay,less than 10 seconds per vehicle.This occurs when progression is extremely favorable,and most vehicles arrive during the green phase.Most vehicles do not stop at all.Short cycle lengths may also contribute to low delay. El Average control delay is greater than 10 seconds per vehicle and less than or equal to 2() seconds per vehicle.This generally occurs with good progression and/or short cycle lengths More vehicles stop than for a level of service A,causing higher levels of average delay. C Average control delay is greater than 20 seconds per vehicle and less than or equal to 35 seconds per vehicle.These higher delays may result from fair progreesion and/or longer cycle lengths.Individual cycle failures may begin to appear at this level.The number of vehicles stopping is significant at this level,although many still pass through the intersection without stopping. D Average control delay is greater than 35 seconds per vehicle and less than or equal to 55 seconds per vehicle.The influence of congestion becomes more noticeable.Longer delays may result from some combination of unfavorable progression,long cycle length,or high volume/capacity ratios.Many vehicles stop,and the proportion of vehicles not stopping declines.IndMdual cycle failures are noticeable. E Average control delay is greater than 55 seconds per vehicle and less than or equal to 80 seconds per vehicle.This is usually considered to be the limit of acceptable delay.These high delay values generally (but not always)indicate poor progression,long cycle lengths, and high volume/capacity ratios.Individual cycle failures are frequent occurrences. F Average control delay is in excess of 80 seconds per vehicle.This is considered to be unacceptable to most drivers.This condition often occurs with oversaturetion.It may also occur at high volume/capacity ratios below 1.0 with many individual cycle failures.Poor progression and long cycle lengths may also contribute to such high delay values,even when the volume/capacity ratio is significantly below 1 .O. I I I I I I I I I I 1 Most of the material in this appendix is adapted from the Transportation Research Board,Highway Capacity Manual,(2000). I January2006 Renton Lowe"s Appendix C I Table C2 Level of Service Criteria for Signalized Intersections Level of Service Average Control Delay per Vehicle (Seconds) A 10 B >10 and _-<20 C >20 and -35 D >35 and <55 E >55 and _80 F >80 I I I I I I I I Unslgnalized Intersections Unsignalized intersections include two-way stop-controlled (TWSC)and all-way stop-controlled (AWSC)intersections.The 2000 Highway Capacity Manual provides models for estimating average control delay at both TWSC and AWSC intersections.Table C3 provides a qualitative description of each LOS category as it applies to unsignalized intersections,and Table C4 identifies the average control delay threshold point used as the boundary for each LOS category.LOS thresholds for the specific reviewing jurisdiction(s)are described in the body of the report. Table C3 Level of Service Criteria for Unsignalized Intersections Level ofService Average Delay per Vehicle to Minor Street Nearly all drivers find freedom of operation with very little time spent waiting for an A acceptable gap. Very seldom is there more than one vehicle in queue. Some ddvers begin to consider the average control delay an inconvenience,but B acceptable gaps are still very easy to find. Occasionally there is more than one vehicle in queue. Average control delay becomes noticeable to most drivers,even though acceptable C gaps are found on a regular basis. It is not uncommon for an arriving driver to find a standing queue of at least one additional vehicle. Average control delay is long enough to be an irritation to most drivers.Average D control delay is long because acceptable gaps are hard to find,because there is e standing queue of vehicles already waiting when the driver arrives,or both, Drivers find the length of the average control delay approaching intolerable levels. Average control delay is long because acceptable gaps are hard to find,because E there is a standing queue of vehicles already waiting when the driver arrives,or both. There may or may not be substantial excess capacity remaining at the intersection when this condition is encountered. Most drivers encountering this condition consider the length of the average control delay to be too long. F Average control delay is long because acceptable gaps are hard to find,because there is a standing queue of vehicles already waiting when the driver arrives,or both. There may or may not be substantial exce.ge capacity remaining at the intersection when this condition is encountered. I I I I I I I I I January 2006 Renton Lowe's Appendix C I Table C4 Level of Service Criteria for Unsignalized Intersections Level of Service Average Control Delay per Vehicle (Seconds) A --<10 []>10 and <,15 C >15 and _25 O >25 and _-<35 E >35 and _50 F >50 I I I I I I I i I I I I I I I I It should be noted that the level of service criteria for unsignalized intersections are somewhat different than the criteria used for signalized intersections.The primary reason for this difference is that drivers expect different levels of performance from different kinds of transportation facilities. The expectation is that a signalized intersection is designed to carry higher traffic volumes than an unsignalized intersection.Additionally,there are a number of driver behavior considerations that combine to make delays at signalized intersections less onerous than at unsignalized intersections. For example,drivers at signalized intersections are able to relax during the red interval,while drivers on the minor street approaches to TWSC intersections must remain attentive to the task of identifying acceptable gaps and vehicle conflicts.Also,there is often much more variability in the amount of delay experienced by individual drivers at unsignalized intersections than signalized intersections.For these reasons,the control delay threshold for any given level of service has been set to be less for an unsignalized intersection than for a igfialized intersection.While overall intersection level of service is calculated for AWSC intersections,level of service is only calculated for the minor approaches and the major street left turn movements at TWSC intersections.No delay is assumed to the major street through movements.For TWSC intersections,the overall intersection level of service remains undefined:level-of-service is only calculated for each minor street lane. In the performance evaluation of unsignalized intersections,it is important to consider other measures of effectiveness (MOE's)in addition to delay,such as v/e ratios for individual movements,average queue lengths,and 95th-percentile queue lengths.By focusing on a single MOE for the worst movement only,such as delay for the minor-street 'left turn,users may make inappropriate traffic control decisions. I 0 0 0 0 Appendix D 2005 Existing ;rations Worksheets I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I 0) o I c" D4 QI (p, CP e o U -o ,' N S rJ O ++ £@ @ *,. 0 O 0 0 ..o ioooo..oo @ L Ip nc o uu4 4 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I ? o 3 g o m o LC, + W i o 0. C 0 C0 '-,-*(3 o .-4 .,.: H ". o ....oo :U .o "'-",,'".o,,,o;oo,...o .o ."° B .o i oooo..',o,oo,?,no..o,),,.-,o.o-,,,oo.,o.o,,:.,-:ioi,-: ..0.o _±o .....±o.oo :>:,,,o .....u o i .ooooooo oo .o .o. m ,-to ooooo.oooooo oooo ooooo@o.J*6,o o i o o o oo ooo o°OOoOO.=............ .,,...,.....o ....... .o oooo.oooooo oo -o ®.*"A'Ao ,.............. o .....o Oo coooooooooo oooo 'o oooo0Ohoooo0'00 oo .o0o*.a o ,,o .,°o oo°° ,,o °^OoO ...................o oo .oo, :..,-xo AA ,•.oo•"Z (n o i oo oo ooo. o ..:-.,,0 • o= i 3 c 9 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I o oc ILl o "o@m go g [. c.. 4a i Ln , o Q c i J OCL, •I ,o i mLJ',j® o o GI I u i x o /ii1 iii r,l 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O iJ Appendix E Crash Data p k!l iI ....L •r L I l J I I I I I ACCIDENT ANALYSIS KR-rELSON &ASSOCIATES,INC. 610 SW Alder.Suite 700 Portland.Oregon 97205 (503)228-5230 Fax:(503)273-8169 ARTERIAL ANALYSIS I I I Street Name: To:M,e Pot Average Daily Traffic = Length of Segment (mies)= Number of Accidents = Time Penod (years)= Accident Rate =I I t'°°°'C°°l 'TAcciddets;Arnvm INTERSECTION ANALYSIS I I I I I I I I Intemection:ParkAve/Lake"Washington:. Vehicles Enterieg Intersection =2"'450 . Number of Accidents =1 Time Period =::3 M e Pos ; 1,000,000 3 :0.45 :Aocidents/ev,J Intersection:Sth:St/G¢..A NumberVehiclesofEntedegAccidentslntersecti°n==4810 Time Period = Accident Rate = M e POS .' ,o,ol 1 ,.ooo.ooo O57 7Aidents=/nd= Intersection:Ga-r deniAve/Orive-#/ Vehicles Entenng Intersection =4;'-' Number of Accidents = Tin Period = Accident Rate=4.701 36151 Mile Post 1.000,000 3 •O.19:AccidehtsZmev':; Vehicles Entering Intersection = Number of Accidents = Time Period = Accident Rate = Mile Post 1,000,000 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I City of Renton Location Report 1/6/2006 Report Period:10/01/2002 1o 09/3012005 Location:GARDEN AVE N at PARK AVE N Comment:Requested by Jerilyn Wen of Kittelson &Assoc. Year 2003 Collision Time Of Case Date Collision Number Type ofCollision Tue-6/3/2003 07:51 AM 03-445 Right Angle Number of Collisions:1 Year 2004 Collision Time Of Case Date Collision Number Type ofCollision ThuJ,/8/2004 Mon-6/28/2004 Thu-7/8/2004 Mon-8/16/2004 Sat-8/2112004 Sun-10/3/2004 Thu-12/2/2004 Number of Collisions: Year 2005 Collision Date 02:43 PM 044)272 Rear End 08:45 AM 04-504 Sideswipe 04:50PM 04-530C Rear End 05:20 PM 04-664 Right Angle 05:06 PM 04-687 Rear End 03:35 PM 04-8151 Rear End 01:15 PM04-1051C Rear End Time Of Case Collision Number Type ofCollision Thu-3/31/2005 Sun-6/5/2005 Sat-8/6/2005 Sun-9/4/2005 Number of Collisions:4 Grand Totals: Number of Collsions: Number of Vehicles Involved: Number of Fatalities: Number of Injuries: Number of PDOs: 10:48 PM 054)280 Right Angle 01:05 PM 05-0497 Sideswipe 10:25 AM 05-0692 Right Angle 01:57 PM 054)782 Rear End 12 25 0 (0.00%) 3/3 (25.00%) 9 (75.00%) Pagel Direction Num Num Hit &Tot Veh 1 Veh2 Fat Inj PDO Run Veh N->E E->S 0 1 2 Totals:0 1 0 0 2 Direction Num Num Hit &Tot Veh 1 Veh 2 Fat Inj PDO Run Veh E->W E->W 0 P 3 S->E S->E 0 P 2 N->W N->W 0 1 H 2 S->N E->W 0 P 2 E->W E->W 0 P 2 E->S E->S 0 P 2 S->E S->E 0 P 2 Totals:0 1 6 1 15 Direction Num Num Hit &Tot Veh l Veh2 Fat Inj PDO Run Veh S->E W->E 0 P 2 W->E W->E 0 1 2 S->E W->E 0 P 2 N->W N->W 0 P 2 Totals:0 1 3 0 8 I I . I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I City of Renton Location Report 1/6/2006 Report Period:1010112002 to 09/3012005 Location:EIGHTH ST.N at GARDEN AVE N Comment:Requested by Jerilyn Wen of Kittelson &Assoc. Year 2003 Collision Time Of Case Date Collision Number Type of Collision Fri-1/24/2003 Fri-12/19/2003 Number of Collisions:2 Year 2004 Collision Date 04:00 PM03-0069C Right Angle 02:23 PM 03-1105 Right Angle Time Of Case Collision Number Type of Collision Wed-4/14/2004 Number of Collisions:1 Grand Totals: Number of Collsions: Number of Vehicles Involved: Number of Fatalities: Number of Injuries: Number of PDOs: 04:25 PM 04-0292 Fixed Object/Parked Vehicle 3 5 0 (0.00%) 1/1 (33.33%) 2 (66.67%) Pagel Direction Num Num Hit &Tot Veh 1 Veh 2 Fat Inj PDO Run Veh N->S E->W 0 1 2 W->E N->S 0 P 2 Totals:0 1 1 0 4 Direction Num Num Hit &Tot Veh 1 Veh2 Fat Inj PDO Run Veh S->E 0 P 1 Totals:0 0 1 0 1 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I Report Period:10/01/2002 to 09/30/2005 City of Renton Corridor Report Corridor:GARDEN AVE N between EIGHTH ST.N and PARK AVE N Comment: 1/6/2006 Requested by J.Wen Kittelson &Assoc.Includes collisions within 100'as intersection-related collisions EIGHTH ST.N at GARDEN AVE N Year:2003 Date Time Of Case Collision Collision Number Type ofCollision Fri-1/24/2003 04:00 PM 03-0069C Right Angle Fri-12/19/2003 02:23 PM 03-1105 Right Angle Yearly Totals:Number of 2 Collisions: Year:2004 Date Time Of Case Collision Collision Number Type of Collision Wed-4/14/2004 04:25 PM Yearly Totals:Number of Collisions: Link Totals:Number of Collisions: 04-0292 Fixed Object/Parked Vehicle 1 3 GARDEN AVE N 850 ft.S of PARK AVE N Year:2005 Date Time Of Case Collision Collision Number Type ofCollision Sat-5/21/2005 01:24 PM Yearly Totals:Number of Collisions: Link Totals:Number of Collisions: GARDEN AVE N at PARK AVE N Year:2003 I I Date Time Of Collision Collision Tue-6/3/2003 07:51 AM Yearly Totals:Number of Collisions: 05-0457 Right Angle 1 Case Number Type of Collision 03-445 Right Angle 1 I Page 1 Direction Num Num Hit &Tot Veh 1 Veh 2 Fat Inj PDO Run Veh N->S E->W 1 2 W->E N->S P 2 Totals:0 1 1 0 4 Direction Num Num Hit &Tot Veh 1 Veh 2 Fat InJ PDO Run Veh S->E P 1 Totals:.0 0 1 0 1 Totals:.;0 1 2 0 5 Direction Num Num Hit &Tot Veh 1 Veh 2 Fat Inj PDO Run Veh E->S S->N P Totals:0 0 1 0 Totals:0 0 1 0 Direction Num Num Hit &Tot Veh 1 Veh 2 Fat Inj PDO Run Veh N->E E->S 1 2 Totals:0 1 0 0 2 i Year:2004 I I I I I Date Time Of Collision Collision Thu-4/8/2004 02:43 PM Mon-6/28/2004 08:45 AM Thu-7/8/2004 04:50 PM Mort-8/16/2004 05:20 PM Sat-8/21/2004 05:06 PM Sun-10/3/2004 03:35 PM Thu-12/2/2004 Yearly Totals:Number of Collisions: Case Number Type of Collision I I I I I 04-0272 Rear End 04-504 Sideswipe 04-530C Rear End 04-664 Right Angle 04-687 Rear End 04-815I Rear End 01:15 PM 04-1051C RearEnd 7 Year:2005 Date Time Of Collision Collision Thu-3/31/2005 10:48 PM Sun-6/5/2005 01:05 PM Sat-8/6/2005 10:25 AM Sun-9/4/2005 01:57 PM Yearly Totals:Number of Collisions: Link Totals:Number of Collisions: Totals for "Corridor: •Number of Collisions: Total Vehicles Involved: Number of Fatalities: Number ofInjuries: Number of PDOs: Case Number Type of Collision 05-0280 Right Angle 05-0497 Sideswipe 05-0692 Right Angle 05-0782 Rear End 4 12 16 30 0 (0.00%) 4/4 (25.00% 12 (75.00% I I I I I I I Page 1 I Direction Num Num Hit &Tot Veh I Veh 2 Fat Inj PDO Run Veh E->W E->W P 3 S->E S->E P 2 N->W N->W 1 H 2 S->N E->W P 2 E->W E->W P 2 E->S E->S P 2 S->E S->E P 2 Totals:0 1 6 1 15 Direction Num Num Hit &Tot Veh 1 Veh 2 Fat lnj PDO Run Veh S->E W->E P 2 W->E W->E 1 2 S->E W->E P 2 N->W N->W P 2 Totals:0 1 3 0 8 Totals:0 3 9 1 25 Appendix F 2007 Background .,rations Worksheets I I I I I I I I I I + .o o ..o o° u ,>.,0.0 I m i ,u4 U e U m 1 P I I I I I I I I I t oUJ , dd N m'13 go N °i o o E g 1 ..o o .. ,o ,-i o ,,.o.oo o o o o r .iii 4 £ I I I I I I I I I I o o U 6g o o o d).0 >• t-@ • o ....u 0.i ,O,• o r , ,I ", •,o. ,zJ* .o 3 1•0 i •&, o #a .0 0 U o o o U m6, i i o i i ooooooooo.......: 1 0 O NN*NNNN .........."'°"ii ii ooooooooo X XXX XX$ i i o o ..o X X X ooooooooo xoo ::.i ± ooooooooo o X X 0 0 X X o o xx i'i" ii-ii..o, .- ......;xo.o o,oo-' ...................... I I I I I I I I I o o b 4D i@ '0 0 0o U@ o /m o o Trafflx 7,7,0515 (c)2005 Dowling ASSOC,Licensed to KITTELSON,PORTLAND pm Mort Jan 9,2006 14:58:36 Page 5-1 ................................................................................ Kittelson &Associates,Inc.-Project #:7662 Renton Lowes -Renton,Washington 2007 Background Traffic Conditions,Weekday RM Peak Hour ................................................................................ Level Of Service Computation Report 2000 HCM Operations Method (Future Volume Alternative) Intersection #3 8th S/Garden Ave Cycle (sec}:100 Critical Vol./Cap.(X):0.214 Loss Time (secl:8 (Y+R =4 sec)Average Delay (sec/veh):12,2 Optimal Cycle:21 Level Of Service:B ******************************************************************************** Approach:North Bound South Bound East Bound West BOiLed Movement:L -T -R L -T -R L -T -R L -T -R ............I ...............II ...............il ...............II ...............Control:Permitted Permitted Permitted pernitted Rights:Include Include Include Include Min.Green:0 0 0 0 O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Lanes:0 0 ii 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 1 O 1 0 0 1 0 1 0 ............I ...............Ib ...............II ...............II ...............Voltune Module:>>Count Date:6 Dec 2005 <<4:30 -5:30 PM Base Vol:1 1 1 40 1 80 155 60 1 1 45 95 Growth Adj 1,04 1.04 1.04 1.04 1,04 1,04 1,04 1,04 1.04 1,04 1.04 1,04 Initial Bse:1 1 1 42 1 83 161 62 1 1 47 99 Added Vol:0 0 0 O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 PasSerByVol:0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Initial Fur:1 1 1 42 i 83 161 62 1 l 47 99 User Adj:1.00 l.O0 1,00 1.00 1,00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj:0,97 0.97 0,97 0.97 0,97 0.87 0.97 0.87 0.97 0.97 0.97 8.97 PHF VolU/ne:I 1 1 43 1 86 166 64 1 i 48 102 Reduct Voii 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced Vol:l 1 1 43 1 86 166 64 1 i 48 102 PCE Adj 1.00 1,00 1,00 1.00 1.00 1.00 l.OO 1.00 1,00 1.00 1.00 1.00 MLF Adj:1.00 1.00 1,00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Final VOI.:1 1 1 43 1 86 166 64 1 1 48 102 Vol/Sa::0,00 0.00 Crit Moves: Green/Cycle:0.25 0.25 Volume/Cap:0,01 0.01 Delay/Veh:28.0 28.0 User DelAdj 1.00 1,00 AdjDel/Veh:28.0 28.0 HCM2kAvg:0 0 ............I ...............Jl ...............II ...............II ...............Saturation Flow Module: Sat/Lane:1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Adjustment:0.62 0.62 0.62 0.76 0.76 0.83 0.61 0.61 0.61 0.78 0,78 0.78 Lanes:0.34 0.33 0.33 O. S 0.02 1.00 1.00 0,99 0.02 0,02 0,98 1.00 Final Sat.:390 390 390 1408 05 1583 1163 1148 19 32 1457 1483 ............I ...............II ...............II ...............II ...............Capacity Analysis Module: 0.00 0.03 0.03 0.05 8.14 0.06 0.06 0.03 0.03 0.07 t******* 0.25 0.05 0.25 0.25 0.67 0.67 067 0.67 0.67 0.67 0.01 0.12 0.12 0.21 0.21 0.08 0.08 0.05 0.05 0,10 28,0 28,9 28.9 29.8 6.6 5.9 5.9 5.7 5.7 6.0 1,00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 28.0 28.9 28,9 29.8 6.6 5.9 5.9 5,?5,7 6,0 0 i 1 2 3 I i 1 1 1 ******************************************************************************** Trafeix 7,7,0515 (c)2005 Bowling Assoc.Licensed to KITTELSON,PORTLAND H:\projfile\7662 RenEon Lowe's\traffixktraffix ouput.doc Page 6 of 9 | | | | | | | | | | Appendix G 2007 Total Traffic )erations Worksheets ,v ,J ......•7 i .I ! ! ! ! ! ! ! m n mum m m m m m n m u n n n n m![ pm Frl Jan 13,2006 16:57:20 Page I-I Kittelson &Assoclates Inc -Project #7582 Renton Lowes -Renton WaBhing0on 2007 Total Trafflc Conditions Weekday PM Peak Hour Scenario Repor Scenario:pm Cormandl pm Volume:pln Geometry:Pln Impact Fee:Default Impact Fee Trip Generation:pm Trip Distribution:Default Trip Distribution Paths:Default Paths Routes:Default Routes Configuration Default Configuration pm Fri Jan 13,2006 16:57:21 Page 2-1 ................................................................................ Kitelson &Assoclaes,Inc,-Projec #:7862 Renton Lowes -Renton.Washington 2007 Total Traffic Condltlons,Weekday PM Peak Hour ................................................................................ Impact Itnalysis Report Level Of Service Itersecio Base Future Change Del/V/Dell V/in LOS Veh C LOS Veh C #1 Park Ave/Lake Washington Blvd-C 30,4 0.751 D 50.9 0.785 +20,475 D/V #2 Garden Ave/Shared Driveway B 10,4 0.000 B 12.8 0.000 +2.287 D/V #3 Bth St/Garden Ave B 12.2 0.214 B 14.8 0.340 ÷ 2.857 D/V #10 Garden Ave/North Driveway A 9.0 0.000 B 11.4 0.000 +2.427 D/V Traffix 7.7.0515 (c)2005 Dowling Assoc.Licensed to KITTELSON,PORTLAND Trafflx 7.7.0515 (c)2005 Dowllng Assoc.Licensed to KITTELSON,PORTLAND H:\projfile\7662 -Renton Lee's\traffix\traffix output.doe Page 7 of 9 m m m m n m u n m m m m m m m m m m m pm Pri Jan 13,2006 16:57:21 Page 3-1 ............................................................................... Kittelson &Associates,Inc,-Project #:7662 Renton Lowes -Renton,Washington 2007 Total Traffic Conditions,Weekday PM Peak Hour ...........................................r .................................... Level Of Service Computation Report 2000 HCM Operations Mhod (Future Voltune Alternative) Intersection #i Park Ave/Lake Washington Blvd-Garden Ave Cycle (see):80 Crltical Vol./Cap.[x):0.785 Loss Time (see):12 (Y+R =4 sec)Average Delay (sec/veh):50.9 Optimal Cycle:68 Level Of Service:D Approach:North Bound Seuth Bound East Bound West Bound Control:Split Phase Split Phase Protected Protected Rights :Include Include Include Include Min.Green:0 0 O 0 0 0 0 0 O 0 8 0 Lanes :O 0 0 0 2 1 0 0 0 1 1 0 2 1 0 1 0 1 1 1 ............I ...............II ...............II ...............II ...............Volume Module:>>Count Date:6 Dec 2005 <<4:30 -5:30 FM Base Vol:0 0 310 75 0 270 210 695 i0 125 680 70 Growth Adj:1.04 1.04 1,04 1.04 1.04 1.04 1.04 1.04 1.04 1.04 1,04 1.04 Initial Bse:0 0 322 78 0 291 218 723 l0 130 707 73 Added Vol:0 0 85 0 0 0 0 0 0 75 0 0 PasserByVol :0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Initial Fur:0 0 407 78 0 281 218 723 1O 205 707 73 User Adj 1.00 1,00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj:0,94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0,94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 PHF Volume:0 0 433 83 0 299 232 769 ii 218 752 77 Reduct VOI:0 O 0 0 0 8 0 0 0 0 8 O Reduced VOI:0 0 433 83 0 299 232 769 iI 218 752 77 PCE Adj:1.00 1.00 1.00 1,00 1.00 1.00 1.0O 1.00 l.O0 1.00 1.00 1.00 MLF Adj:1,00 1.00 l,OO 1,00 1.00 1.08 1.00 1.00 1,00 1.00 1,00 1.00 Final Vol.:0 O 433 83 O 299 232 789 ii 218 752 77 ............I ...............II ...............II .............................•Saturation Flow Module: Sat/Lane:1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1800 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Adjustment:1.00 1,00 0,83 0.93 1,00 0.83 0.92 0.97 0.97 0.91 0,95 0.95 Lanes:0,O0 0,00 2,00 l,O0 0,0O 1,00 1.00 2.96 0.04 1.00 2,00 1,0O Final Sat,:0 0 3165 1769 0 1583 1753 5445 78 1736 3604 1802 ............I ...............11 ...............II ..............................Capacity -nalysis Module: Vol/Sat:0.00 0.00 0,14 0.05 0.00 0.19 0.13 0,14 0.14 0.13 0.21 0.04 Crit Moves:"***....t**.*** Green/Cycle:0.00 0.00 0.16 0.13 0,00 0.13 0,18 0.55 0.55 0,16 0,55 0.55 Voltune/Cap:0.00 0.00 0,88 0.38 0.00 1.51 0.76 0,26 0.28 0.80 0.38 0.08 Delay/Veh:0.8 0.0 49.0 33.2 0,0 288.8 41.8 9.5 9,5 48.3 10.3 8,5 User DelAdj 1.00 1.00 1.80 1,00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1,00 1.00 1.08 1.00 1,00 AdjDel/Veh:0.0 O.0 49.0 33.2 0,O 288.8 41.8 9.5 9.5 48.3 10.3 8.5 HCM2 kAvs :0 0 8 2 0 22 8 3 3 8 5 1 pm Frl Jan 13,2006 16:57:21 Page 4-1 ................................................................................ Kitelson &Associates,Inc.-Project 8:7662 Renton Lowes -Renton,Washington 007 Total Traffic Conditions,Weekday PM Peak Hour ................................................................................ Level Of Service Coutatlon Report .2000 HCM Unsignalized Method {Future Voltune Alternative) Intersection #2 Garden Ave/Shared Driveway Average Delay (sec/veh):4.2 Worst Case Level Of service:B[12.6] ******************************************************************************** Approach:North Bound South Bound East Botnd Wes BOiLed Movem%ent:L -T -R L -T -R L -T -R L -T -R ............I ...............II ...............Jl ...............[I ...............[ Control:Uncontrolled Unconrolled SoR Sign Stop Sign Rights:Include Include Include Include Lanes:0 0 1 1 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ii 0 0 ............I ...............II ...............II ...............II ...............IVoltuneModule:>>CoUnt Date:6 Dec 8005 <<4:30 -5:30 PM Base Vol 0 210 i0 75 60 0 0 O 0 20 0 10O GrOWth AdJ:1.04 1.04 1.04 1.04 1.04 1.04 1.04 1.04 1.04 1.04 1,04 1.04 Initial Bse:0 218 I0 78 62 0 0 0 0 21 0 104 Added Vol 0 -5 80 0 43 0 0 0 0 43 0 0 PasserByVol:0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Initial Fur:0 213 90 78 105 0 0 0 0 64 0 104 User Adj:1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.80 1.00 1.00 1.00 1,00 1.00 PHF Adj:0.92 0192 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 PHF Volume:0 232 98 85 I15 0 0 0 0 69 0 113 Reduct Vol:0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Final Vol.:0 232 98 85 115 0 0 0 O 69 0 113 Critical Gap Module: Critical Gp:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx 4,1 xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx 6.8 xxxx 6.9 FollowUpTi:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx 2,2 XXXX XXXXX XXXXX xxxx xxxxx 9.5 xxxx 3,3 ............1 ...............II ...............II ...............II ...............1CapacityModule: Cnflict Vol:xxxx xxxx xxxxx 350 xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx 508 xxxx 165 Poten Cap.:xxxx xxxx xxxxx 1226 xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx XXXXX 499 xxxx 857 Move Cap.:xxxx xxxx xxxxx 1226 xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx 472 xxxx 857 VolUme/Cap:xxxx xxxx xxxx 0.07 xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx 015 xxxx 0.13 ............I ...............II ...............Ir ...............II ...............ILevelOfServiceModule: /eue:xxxxx XXXX xxxxx 0.2 Xxxx Xxxxx MXXXX xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx Xxxxx Stopped Del:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx 8.2 xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx LOS by Move:A Movement:LT -LTR -RT LT -LTR -RT LT -LTR -RT LT -LTR -RT Shared Cap.:xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx 654 xxxxx SharedQuee:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx 0,2 xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx 1,1 xxxxx Shrd StpDel:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx 8.2 xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx 12.6 xxxxx Shared LOS:A B ApproachDel xxxxxx xxxxxx xxxxxx 12.6 ApproachLOS:B Traffix 7.7.0515 (c)2005 Dowling ASSOC.Licensed to KITTELSON,PORTLAND Traffix 7.7.0515 (c)2005 Dowllng ASSOC.Licensed to KITTELSON,PORTLA H:\projfile\7662 -Renton Lowe's\fraffix\traffix output.doe Page 8 of 9 m m m m m m n m m m m m u mm m n m[ Fri Jan 13,2006 16:57:21 Fag8 5-1 ................................................................................ Kittelson &Associates.Inc.-Project #:7662 Renton Lewes -Renton,Washington 2007 Total Traffic Conditions.Weekday PM Peak Hour ................................................................................Level Of Service computation Report 2000 HCM Operations Method (Future Volume Alternative) ******************************************************************************** Intersection #3 8th St/Garden Ave Cycle (see):100 Critical Vol./Cap.(X):0.340 Loss Time (sec):8 (Y÷R =4 sec)Average Delay (sec/veh):14,6 Optimal Cycle:25 Level Of Service:B ******************************************************************************** Approach:North BoUnd South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement:L -T -R L -T -R L -T R L T -R............I ...............PI ...............II ..........[....II ....[..........Control:Permitted Permitted Permitted Rights:Include Include Include Min.Green:0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Lanes:0 0 I!0 0 0 i 0 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 ............)...............Lq ...............II ...............IVolumeModule:>>Count Date:6 Dec 2005 <c 4;30 -5:30 FM Base VOI:1 1 1 40 1 00 155 60 1 Growth AdJ:1.04 1.04 1.04 1,04 1.04 1.04 1.04 1,04 1.04 Initial Bse:1 1 1 42 I 83 161 62 1 Added Vol:0 0 0 9 0 77 68 0 0 PasserByVol:0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Initial Fur:I i 1 51 I 160 229 62 i User Adj:1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj:0,97 0.97 0.97 0,97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 .0.97 PHF Voltune:1 i i 52 1 165 236 64 1 Reduct VOI:0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced Vol:"1 1 1 52 I 165 236 64 1 PCE Adj:1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 i*00 1,00 1,00 1.00 MLF Adj 1,00 1.00 1.00 1.00 i.00 I*00 1,00 1.00 1.00 Final VOI.:i 1 1 52 1 165 236 64 i ............I ...............II ...............il ...............ISaturationFlowModule: Sat/Lane:1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Adjustment:0.62 0.62 0.62 0,75 0.75 0.83 0.60 0.60 0.60 Lanes:0.34 0,33 0.33 0.98 0.02 1.00 1.00 0.98 0,02 Final Sat.:391 391 391 1402 29 1583 1135 1121 19 ...........I ...............II ...............il ...............ICapacityAnalysisModule: Vol/Sat;0.00 0.00 0.00 0.04 0.04 0,i0 0.21 0.06 0.06 Crit Moves:"**"**'* Green/Cycle:0,31 0,31 0.31 0,31 0,31 0.31 0.61 0.61 0,01 Voltue/Cap:0.01 0,01 0.01 0,12 0.12 0.34 0.34 0,09 0.09 Delay/veh:24.1 24.1 24.1 25.1 25.1 27.2 9.7 8,0 8.0 User DelAdj:1,00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1,00 1,00 1,00 1.00 1.00 AdjDel/Veh:24.1 24,1 24.1 25.1 25.1 27.2 9.7 6.0 8,0 HCM2kAvg:0 0 0 2 2 4 5 1 I ******************************************************************************** Permitted Include 0 0 0 0 i 0 1 0 J ............... 1 45 95 1.04 1.04 1.04 1 47 99 0 0 8 0 0 0 1 47 107 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.97 0.97 0.97 1 48 ii0 0 0 0 1 48 i10 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1,00 1 48 ii0 1900 1900 1900 0.78 0,78 0.78 0,02 0,98 1.00 92 1452 1478 I ............... 003 0.03 0,07 0.61 0.61 0.61 0.05 0,05 0.12 7.8 7.8 8.1 1,00 1.00 1.00 7.8 7.8 8.i 1 1 i pm Frl Jan 12,2006 16:57:21 Page 6-1 ................................................................................Klttelson &Associates,Inc.-Project #:7662 Renten Lces -Renton,Washington 2007 Total Traffic Conditions,Weekday PM Peak Hour ................................................................................Level Of Service Computation Report 2000 HCM Unsignalized Method {Future Voltbe Alternative) Intersection #i0 Garden Ave/Worth Driveway Average Delay (sec/veh):3.5 Worst Case Level Of Service:B[11.4] Approach:North Bound South Round East Round West Bound Movement:L -T -R L -T -R L -T -R L -T -R ............I ...............II ...............II ...............II ...............1Control:Uncontrolled Uncontrolled Stop Sign Stop Sign Rights:Include Include Include Include Lanes :0 0 1 1 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 I 0 0 1 ............I ...............II ...............il ...............II ...............IVOItUModule:>CotLnt Date:6 Dec 2005 <<4:30 -5:30 PMBaseVol:0 310 0 0 135 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Growth Adj:1,04 1.04 1.04 1.04 1.04 1.04 1.04 1.04 1,04 1.04 1,04 1,04 Initial Bse:0 322 0 0 140 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Added VOI:0 -20 15 80 -5 0 0 0 0 48 0 105 PasserByVol:0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Initial Fur:0 302 15 80 135 0 0 0 0 48 0 105 User Adj:1.00 1,00 Ii00 1.00 l.D0 1.00 1.00 1.00 1,00 1,00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj:0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0,92 0.92 0,92 PHF Voltune:0 329 16 87 147 0 0 0 0 52 0 114 Reduct VOI:0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Final Vol.:0 829 16 87 147 0 0 0 0 52 0 114 Critical Gap Module: Critical Gp:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx 4.1 xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx 6.8 xxxx 6,9 FollowUpTim:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx 2.2 xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx 3.5 xxxx 3,3 ............I ...............II ...............II ...............II ...............ICapacityModule: Cnflict Vol:xxxx xxxx xxxxx 345 xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx 584 xxxx 173 Potent Cap.:xxxx xXX-X xxxxx 1211 A"XXX xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx 447 xxxx B47 Move Cap.:xxxx xxxx xxxxx 1211 xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx 421 xxxx 847 VolUe/Cap:xxxx xxxx xxxx 0.07 xxxx xxx× XXXX xxxx xxxx 0.12 xxxx 0.13 ............I ...............II ...............II ...............II ...............ILevelOfServiceModule: Queue;xxxxx xxxx xxxxx 0,2 xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx 0,5 Stopped Del:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx 8.2 xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx 9.9 LOS by Move:A A Moveent:LT -LTR -RT LT -LTR -RT LT -LTR -RT LT -LTR -RT Shared Cap.:xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx 421 xxxx xxxxx SharedQueue:xxxxx xxxx xc(xxx 0.2 xxxx xxxxx xxxx-x xxw-x xxxxx 0.4 xxxx xxxxx Shrd StpDel:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx 8.2 xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx 14.7 xxxx xxxx× Shared LOS:A B ApproachDel:xxxxxx xxxxxx xxxxxx 11.4 ApproachLOS:B Traffix 7,7.0515 (c}2005 Dowling "Assoc.Licensed to KITTELSON,PORTLAND Traffix 7.7.0515 (c}2005 Dcling ASsoc.Licensed to KITTELSON,PORTLAND H:\projfile\7662 -Renon Lowe's\traffix\traffix output,dec Page 9 of 9 •r, ,t-I i ¸s /J,,'I •"'".1- i i i 4 -I L L 'al44't;'---,t :r¸¸ I I I I I I I I I I I I ! I I I I I I I I I I Project Name: Project Number: Analyst: Date: Filename: Intersection: Conditions (yr,alt.,etc.): SIGNALIZED QUEUE ANALYSIS 1/13/2006 H:or 01Me7E&2 -RerdonLOWe'CeFSg (e.xfs]palk _Ga/d GENERALfNPUTPARAMETERS: I Cycle Length: Confidence Level (C.L): S orafe lenctWvehicie: INPUT PARAMETERS: Volume (pre-PHF)(vph): G/C for movement Number of lanes: CALCULATIONS: Length of red interval (sec): Average total queue (veh): Maximumtotal queue (veh): Total queue length (feet): Required storageJ]ane (feet): PERMITTED LEFT TURNS: Opposing volume (pre-PHF): Opposing sat.flow rate: CALCULATIONS: Opposing flow ratio (Yo): Unblocked G/C: Effective red interval (sec): Average total queue (veh): Maximumtotal queue (veh): Total queue length (leet): Required storage/lane (feet): KITrELSON &ASSOCIATES,INC. 610 SW Alder,Suite 700 Portland,Oregon 97205 (503)228-5230 Fax:(503)273-8169 APPROACH/MOVEMENT #1 #2 #3 #4 #5 #6 #7 #8 67.2 76 12 3OO 150 METHODOLOGy AND FORMULASUSED: Maxtmm queue P ndom rr=VCor,=t ,en*,ce (Pmb M an,vaZ.=tq)=I.S.o,p=oC,abgdlor ,.eh¢lO,t..,NI Opo=r Ikw ruo Y =r*,o /0ppo II lw taleso L,locked 3 I)-(g/C.yoy0-Y) I I I I I I i I I I I I I I I I I I I Project Name: Project Number: Analyst: Date: Fitaname: SIGNALIZED QUEUE ANALYSIS 1/13/2006 H¢olfeW6E *Re,d0n LOwe'sxcer/662Sig Cosue)qpazk .Gatd1 Intersection: Conditions (yr,alt.,etc.): GENERAL INPUT PARAMETERS: I Cycle Length: Confidence Level (C.L): Stora,qe lenAttVvehicle: KI1-RELSON &ASSOCIATES,INC. 610 SW Alder,Suite 700 Portland,Oregon 97205 (503)228-5230 L.J -Fax:(503)273-8169 NPUT PARAMETERS: Volume (pre-PHF)(vph): G/C for movement: Number of lanes: .?,ALCULATIONS: Length of red interval (sac): Average total queue (veh): MaxJmum total queue (veh): Total queue length (feet): Required storage/lane (feet): )ERMITTED LEFT TURNS: Opposing volume (pre-PHF): Opposing sat.flow rate: .ALCULATIONS: Opposing flow ratio (Yo): Unblocked G/C: Effective red interval (sec): Average total queue (veh): Maximumtotal queue (veh): Total queue length (feet): Required storage/lane (feet): #1 #2 69.C 690 1.C 31 75 15 75 15€ APPROACH/MOVEMENT #3 #4 #5 #6 #7 #8 METHODOLOGy 'O FORMULAS USED: Lmgmof r imvl =(I .CC],CyclaW;th Avera a m e,,[r =Volume -Re fmal /3600 [prOb OlatrWIs=N)=(Redln(I)',N*p(.N)IN*(thePc=Od,rZut) I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I o II II I >O'm o tn >..&I--N ". ?_.o o .-o •,.. _% ggN°N g e) t,t:-.",,,, :.,--..,.._.-... >--ea > "E Z3 £2t :: t >.. EE ._o4--U L 4-- I"4 ea E ¢Xl ,,Q ,.DI',-- i. i i i Appendix I Truck Circulation 11235 SE 6TH STREET SUI 220 BELLEVUE,WA 98004 LETTER OF TRANSMITTAL Date:January 18,2007 To:Robert Whitlam,Ph.D.,Department of Arch Laura Murphy,Muckleshoot Cultural Resouri From:Miyoung for Mike Neer,P.E. Re:Lowe's of Renton;Renton,Washington Cultural Resources Assessment J n T 425.453I r7 F 425.453 201IfWVV.PA , n n [1 i" 17 II Remarks:!11 For your records,please find one (1)copy of the Cultural R of Renton Project,prepared by Northwest Archaeological AI [o1 2007.t J If you have any questions regarding the enclosed or this tral 453-9501. Thank you. CC:JgD i-ng,-c-ity Oflritop Greg Finley,Lowe's HIW,Inc. ;RIJ IJ ,sq 0 2005127.014.00/rnlorwtr01 .doc mmn [] t --.wI I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I CULTURAL RESOURCES ASSESSMENT FOR THE PROPOSED LOWE'S OF RENTON, KING COUNTY,WASHINGTON CONTAINS CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION -NOT FOR GENERAL DISTRIBUTION January 15,2007 NWAA Report Number WA 07-014 I I NORTHWEST ARCHAEOLOGICAL ASSOCIATES,INC. SEATTLE,WASHINGTON I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I CULTURAL RESOURCES ASSESSMENT FOR THE PROPOSED LOWE'S OF RENTON, KING COUNTY,WASHINGTON Report Prepared for PacLand Bellevue,Washington By Charles M.Hodges Janua 15,2007 NWAA Report Number WA 07-014 CONTAINS CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION -NOT FOR GENERAL DISTRIBUTION I I Northwest Archaeological Associates,Inc. 5418 -20=Avenue NW,Suite 200 Seattle,Washington 98107 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I CULTI IRAL RESOURCES SURVEY COVER SHEET Author:Charles M.Hodqes Title:Cultural Resources Assessment for the Proposed Lowe's of Renton Project,Renton, King County,Washington Date: County (ies): January 15,2007 Section:8 Township:23 N Range:5 E Quad:U.S.G.S.Renton,WA (revised 1994) Total Pages:4_2__2 Does this replace a draft? Sites Found?No TCP(s)found?No No Acres:9.79 OAHP Site/Field #: i I I I REPORT CHECK LIST Report should contain the following items: •Clear objectives and methods •A Summary of the results of the survey •A report of where the survey records end data are stored •A research design that: •Details survey objectives •Details specific methods •Details expected results •Details area surveyed •Details how results will be feedback in the planning process planning process (Attach additional sheets as necessary) I I I ABSTRACTI I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I Lowe's is proposing construction of a warehouse store and garden center on a 9.79-acre parcel in north Renton just south of the modern shoreline of Lake Washington.Twerty 4-inch- diameter boreholes were excavated through fill to contact with intact buried deposits.Fill thickness ranged from 3 to 8 feet deep,and rested on peats,sand,and silty gravelly sand. Twelve boreholes contained peat deposits,indicating wetlands and shallow near-shore depositional contexts.No archaeological materials were found;however,NWAA recommended the project construction contractors be supplied with an inadvertent discovery plan and be prepared to follow the procedures and protocols specified in the plan in the event of an inadvertent discovery during construction activities. I Northwest Archaeological Associates,Inc. CONTAINS CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION January 15,2007 NOT FOR GENERAL DISTRIBUTION ! !TABLE OF CONTENTS I I ! t I I I I I I I I I I I I ABSTRACT .................................................................iLISTOFFIGURES..........................................................iv LIST OF TABLES ...........................................................iv INTRODUCTION ............................................................1 Regulatory Context ........................................................1 Project Location and Description ............................................1 NATURAL AND CULTURAL SETTING ...........................................3 Geology and Geomorphology ................................................3 Biogeography ............................................................5 Paleoenvironments ........................................................6CulturalHistory...........................................................7 Prehistory .............................................................7 Ethnography and Ethnohistory ....•.........................................8 History ...............................................................9 Previous Archaeological Research ...........................................10 EXPECTATIONS ...........................................................11 METHODS ................................................................12 RESULTS ................................................................13 Fill ....................................................................13 Clastic Facies ...........................................................13 Nistic Facies ............................................................17 Depositional Environments .................................................17 RECOMMENDATIONS ......................................................18 APPENDIX A:Borehole Depth Summary and PhotO Catalog .........................A-1 ! Northwest Archaeological Associates,Inc. CONTAINS CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION January 15,2007 NOT FOR GENERAL DISTRIBUTION LIST OF FIGURES I I I Figure 1. Figure 2. Figure 3. Figure 4. Figure 5. Figure 6. Figure 7. Figure 8. Figure 9. Figure 10. Project location .....................................................2 Overview to north from southern end of project,view to the north ..............3 Aerial photograph showing APE and Borehole locations ....................14 Upper fill under parking lot asphalt.....................................15 Typical expression of silty gravelly sand (Szg)............................15 T-sheet,1902,showing wetlands setting of project and proximity to base of slope to east......................................................16 Typical expression of fibrous peat (Pf)..................................17 Laminated peat and silt at about 9.5 feet below surface in SC-6..............18 North-south section showing vertical distributions of facies in borehole cores....19 Detail of vertical variability among borehole cores at south end of project.......20 Cover:View of north Renton about 1911,courtesy of the Renton Historical Society. LIST OF TABLES I I I I I I I Table 1.Previous Cultural Resource Investigations Within Approximately One Mile of the Project............................................................10 Table 2.Previously Recorded Sites Within Approximately One Mile of the Project.........11 Table 3.Lithofacies Naming Conventions for the Lowe's of Renton Project ..............12 Table 4.Facies Groups and Lithofacies Identified in Cores at the Lowe's of Renton Project.13 I I I I I I I I Northwest Archaeological Associates,Inc. CONTAINS CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION iv January 15,2007 NOT FOR GENERAL DISTRIBUTION I I I INTRODUCTION I I ! I I I I I I I I I I I I I On behalf of Lowe's,PacLand contacted Northwest Archaeological Associates,Inc.(NWAA)to conduct an archaeological assessment of a parcel proposed for a new Lowe's warehouse store and garden center in Renton,Washington.The proposed site of the new store is in north Renton close to the southern shore of Lake Washington.In performing the assessment,NWAA conducted prefield archival research and reviewed the natural and cultural setting of the project area to identify locations of previously known prehistoric and historic cultural properties within the project boundaries and in the vicinity of the project.The archival research was followed by an archaeological field investigation that examined the parcel for previously undiscovered cultural resources. Regulatory Context This report provides documentation for SEPA checklist item B13:Historic and Cultural Presen/ation.The work performed by NWAA was designed to address the three areas of concern outlined under this checklist item: Identify places or objects on or adjacent to the project that are listed or proposed for listing on a historic register; identify places or objects on or adjacent to the project that are of archaeological, scientific,or cultural importance,and; Indicate appropriate mitigation measures for historic or cultural resources. Other Washington State laws also deal with archaeological sites and underwater cultural resources,such as downed planes and sunken ships,Native American burials,and historic cemeteries and burials.The Archaeological Sites and Resources Act [RCW 27.53]prohibits knowingly excavating or disturbing prehistoric and historic archaeological sites on public or private lands.The Indian Graves and Records Act [RCW 27.44]prohibits knowingly destroying American Indian graves and provides that inadvertent disturbance through construction or other activity requires reinterment under supervision of the appropriate Indian tribe.The Abandoned and Historic Cemeteries and Historic Graves Act [RCW 68.60]protects and provides penalties for disturbing or damaging these properties. Project Location and Description The proposed project is at the southeast corner of the intersection of Garden Avenue North and Northeast Park Drive,approximately 1/4 mile south of Lake Washington in Renton,Washington (Figure 1).The project parcel covers 9.79 acres end is bounded by Garden Avenue North and a residential development (The Landing)under construction to the west,Northeast Park Drive and a power station to the north,a Fry's Electronics Superstore and associated asphalt parking to the south,and by the BNSF railroad lines to the east.The study area currently consists of an asphalt-covered parking lot with several light poles interspersed throughout the lot. Current development plans consist of construction of a 128,277 square-foot sales warehouse building and a 29,712 square-foot garden center.The warehouse building will be located in the northern portion of the site,and the garden center will be directly south of the warehouse along I Northwest Archaeological Associates,Inc. CONTAINS CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION January 15,2007 NOT FOR GENERAL DISTRIBUTION Cultural Resources Assessment for the Proposed Lowe's of Renton i i Figure 1.Project location. I I I I I I i I I I I I I I I I Northwest Archaeological Associates,Inc.CONTAINS CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION January 15,2007 NOT FOR GENERAL DISTRIBUTION I I I i I I I I I I I Cultural Resources Assessment for the Proposed Lowe's of Renton the east margin of the parcel.Truck delivery and staging areas will be on the north side of the warehouse building.The southern portion of the parcel will developed with at-grade parking; minor grading is anticipated since the parcel is currently a relatively level paved parking lot (Figure 2). 3 NATURAL AND CULTURAL SETTING Archaeological evidence indicates the Pacific Northwest was occupied by humans soon after land emerged following glacial retreat about 10,000 to 12,000 years ago.Following retreat of the continental ice sheet,changes induced by geomorphology,geology,and climate continued to shape the landscape and influence the people who resided in the Puget Lowland•Large- scale natural processes,such as sea level rise,changes in climate,and earthquakes,affected the distribution of potential resources and contributed to the creation of landforms suitable for human occupation.These same processes have also been responsible for altering the physical character of the archaeological record itself by selectively preserving or destroying sites that contain evidence for how people lived. Geology and Geomorphology The modern topography and surficial geology of the Puget Sound region is the result of multiple widespread continental glaciations that extended southward from British Columbia into the Puget Lowland and along the western flanks of the Cascade Range•Originating in the mountains of southwestern British Columbia,thick lobes of ice advanced southward several times during the Pleistocene Epoch between 1.8 million years ago and the beginning of the I I I I I I I I Figure 2.Overview to north from southern end of project,view to the north. I Northwest Archaeological Associates,Inc.CONTAINS CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION January 15,2007NOTFORGENERALDISTRIBUTION 4 Cultural Resources Assessment for the Proposed Lowe's of Renten Holocene about 10,000 years ago.The latest glacial maximum,known in this region as the Vashon Stade of the Fraser glaciation,began about 17,000 -18,000 years ago and ended abruptly with the onset of climatic warming about 14,000 years ago (Easterbrook 1993; Easterbrook 2003).The ice sheet advanced rapidly,reaching its maximum extent about 15,000 years ago near the present town of Centralia.After remaining stationary for about 1,000 years, the ice sheet retreated rapidly northward,reaching Seattle by approximately 13,600 years ago (Borden and Troost 2001;Porter and Swanson 1998).At its maximum advance,the surface elevation of the ice over the study area was about 1,500 feet above present-day sea level (Dethier et al.1995). The outwash deposited during the advance of the Vashon ice sheet filled the Puget Sound basin with an extensive low-lying area bounded on the west by the Olympic Mountains and the Cascade Range on the east.Sometimes called the "great lowland fill",the surface of this outwash rarely rises above 500 feet elevation and is interrupted by north-south-oriented troughs created by subglacial fluvial incision when the ice overrode the outwash and by subsequent incision by meltwater streams during ice retreat (Booth and Goldstein 1994).As a result,the geomorphology of the Seattle area is dominated by well-defined north-trending ridges separated by extensive glacial drift uplands.The larger troughs are now occupied by the marine waters of Puget Sound or by large freshwater lakes such as Lake Washington,and Lake Sammamish (Galster and Laprade 1991;Liesch et al.1963;Yount et al.1993). The proposed project is just northeast of the confluence of the Black and Cedar Rivers at the former southern shoreline of Lake Washington.During ice retreat,glacial lakes formed behind the retreating Puget lobe as the ice dammed north-flowing streams.The altitudes of the lakes were several hundred feet above current sea level and the Cedar River maintained grade at the altitude of {hese proglacial lakes.When the retreating ice sheet withdrew north past the Strait of Juan de Fuca,Puget Sound was opened to the Pacific Ocean and a connection was established between the sea and the ocean (Dragovich et al.1994).Because sea level at that time was several hundred feet lower than the level of the former glacial lakes,the Cedar River began downcutting through the accumulated glacio-lacustrine and deltaic sediments deposited during the earlier proglacial lake phase of ice retreat.The Cedar River cut rapidly into the glacial sediments along the course that had been established during glacial retreat (Evans and Jensen 1996)and began forming a new,lower,alluvial fan-delta complex near its confluence with the Black River just south of Lake Washington.A fan-delta complex probably blocked off Lake Washington soon after commencement of ice retreat and forced the lake to drain around the toe of the Cedar River fan to the Duwamish embayment by way of the Black River.As the fan-delta complex continued to expand,the river flowed at various times to Lake Washington,to the Black River,or directly to the Duwamish Valley (Mullineaux 1970;Thorson and Leopold 1997). The current alignment of the Cedar River channel is a function of being shifted south by the ice during the last glaciation (Mullineaux 1970).The walls of the valley in the Cedar River gorge, just east of Renton,are characterized by outcrops of the Renton Formation and various glacial deposits (mapped as Qvo and Qva),and the valley wall above 1-405 east of the project is composed of glacial till.Evans and Jensen inferred a fault trace down the center of the Cedar River valley to Renton,and Blakely and others (2002)have mapped a trace of the Seattle Fault Zone through the southern portion of Mercer Island north of the project area (Blakely et al. 2002;see also Shimel et al.2003). I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I Northwest Archaeological Associates,Inc.CONTAINS CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION January 15,2007 NOT FOR GENERAL DISTRIBUTION I I I Cultural Resources Assessment for the Proposed Lowe's of Renton 5 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I The lower Cedar River was channelized in 1912 after the flood of 1911 had inundated the Black River and Cedar River flood plains between Earlington Hill and Renton Hill.Channel shifting along the Renton Reach (the lower 1.6 miles of the river)ceased altogether by 1916 when Lake Washington was lowered after construction of the Lake Washington Ship Canal at Union Bay (Perkins 2004). Prior to channelization in 1912,the Cedar River originally traversed a broad alluvial fan in the vicinity of the City of Renton before flowing into the Black River (Perkins 2004).Above river mile (RM)5 the channel plan form was predominantly branching with forested islands between the branches.Below RM 5 the channel was primarily straight with few meanders (Collins et al. 2003).Between 1865 and 1936,the overall width of the river in the lower reaches was reduced from 250 feet to 170 feet as a result of channelization,bank stabilization,and dam construction in the upper reaches of the river.At the same time,the channel planform changed from a braided pattern characterized by multiple channels to the modern single-threaded pattern (Collins et al.2003;Perkins 2004). Sediments on the floor of the Cedar River valley consist predominantly of narrow strips of pebble-and cobble-sized gravel and coarse sand in and near the river channel flanked by broad areas of sandy and silty alluvium.In several places,however,the coarse channel materials cover as much as half the breadth of the flood plain.The flanking silt and sand deposits appear to be only a few feet thick over gravel in much of the valley,but in places fine-grained gravel- free alluvium is as much as 10 feet thick (Mullineaux 1970). Lake Washington,with a drainage area encompassing 182 square miles,is the largest lake west of the Cascade Range and the second largest natural lake in the state of Washington. Prior to completion of the Lake Washington Ship Canal in 1916,mean seasonal water level in Lake Washington was 8.8 feet higher than at present and the lake fluctuated as much as seven feet between wet and dry seasons.The Lake Washington hydrologic system included the Sammamish River,which was the major tributary to the lake,and the Black River,which formed the lake's natural outflow to Puget Sound.The Cedar River joined the Black River a short distance downstream from the outlet of the lake and,though not normally entering the lake,was an occasional source of water to the lake basin when the river flooded (Chrzastowski 1983; Crandell and Miller 1974). The Black River,the former outlet of Lake Washington,is now buried under Lake Avenue S., and Renton Airport and the Boeing Company's manufacturing facilities now occupy much of the marshland formerly located along the southern shoreline of the lake. Biogeography Northwest Washington is characterized by a temperate maritime climate regime with warm summers and moderate winters.Summer average temperatures are about 61 °F;during the winter temperatures average about 40°F.Rainfall is typically light during summers so that several weeks can pass without precipitation but winters experience frequent rains with the highest amounts of precipitation occurring late in fall and in winter. The Puget Lowland is covered with extensive stands of coniferous forest that comprise the Tsuga heterophylla (western hemlock)vegetation zone.The dominant tree species comprising the forests of this zone are western hemlock,western red cedar,and Douglas fir.Old growth forest understories are typically dense,consisting of shrubs and herbaceous species dominated I Northwest Archaeological Associates,Inc.CONTAINS CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION January 15,2007NOTFORGENERALDISTRIBUTION 6 Cultural Resources Assessment for the Proposed Lowe's of Renton I I by sword fern,salal,Oregon grape,ocean spray,blackberry,red huckleberry,and red elderberry (Franklin and Dyrness 1973).Bigleaf maple and red alder are common in moist areas subject to disturbance;stream courses and flood plains are dominated by red alder,black cottonwood,bigleaf maple,and other riparian plants.Wetlands are common in river valleys and typically support willow,alder,cranberries,cattail,reeds,wapato,nettles,and skunk cabbage (Frenkel and Heinitz 1987). In the mid-nineteenth century,surveyors for the General Land Office observed young stands of trees covering the hills on either side of the Cedar River,on Earlington Hill,and on the hills west of the Green River.Mature stands characterized the remaining land west of the river.Small prairies and meadows,possibly permanent,were scattered on the flood plain and in forested areas.The dominant vegetation on the flood plain was black cottonwood and willow growing primarily on the natural levees with cattail and associated willow,hardhack,and other aquatic plants growing in marshes fringed by willow thickets (Chatters 1981). The Puget Lowland has historically supported large populations of mammals,fish,and birds. Large mammals include black-tailed deer,elk,and black bear;fur-bearing and small mammals include rabbit,fox,wolf,mountain lion,muskrat,and beaver.Freshwater fish such as trout, whitefish,and suckers live in the rivers and lakes;three species of salmon (chinook,chum,and coho)moved through southern Puget Sound and up the Black River on their way to spawning grounds in the Cedar River watershed.Lakes,ponds,rivers and marshes hosted migratory and resident waterfowl (Kruckeberg 1991).Marine mammals residing in Puget Sound,either year- round or seasonally,include harbor seal,sea lion,porpoise,orca,and grey whale.In addition to salmon,cod,sole,herring and other fish are also found in southern Puget Sound.Shellfish include mussels,clams,cockles,barnacles,sea urchins,crabs;scallops are present in deeper waters (Kruckeberg 1991). The arrival of British and American settlers beginning in the 1830s led to rapid alterations of the landscape in the Puget Lowland.Natural habitats have been affected by the introduction of non-native species such as Himalayan blackberries and Scotch broom,as well as by fire suppression,logging,mining,agriculture,and urban development.By 1900 all the timber had been cut around the shores of Lake Washington and the only areas of virgin timber stands were in the upland east of Lake Washington (Davis 1973). Paleoenvironments Regional pollen data recovered from cores in lakes and wetlands around Puget Sound show substantial shifts in the composition and distribution of regional vegetation since the end of the Pleistocene (Tsukada 1982;Whitlock 1992).The first plant species to colonize the Puget Lowland immediately following ice retreat included Iodgepole pine,bracken fern,and red alder. These pioneer species were soon followed by Douglas fir a few centuries later (Barnosky 1985). As the climate continued to warm with commencement of the Holocene,grasslands and oak/hazel woodlands were established and,after a brief period of suppression,Douglas fir became the dominant tree species between 10,500 and 7,000 years ago at the height of postglacial warming.After about 7,000 years ago,cedar and hemlock began to increase and continued to do so until about 5,000 years ago.The modern climate regime was established by 5,000 to 4,000 years ago in which cool,moist conditions and closed canopy climax forests came to predominate (Tsukada 1982;Whitlock 1992).The climate since then has been marked by small-scale changes fluctuating between warmer/drier and cooler/moist conditions (Leopold et al.1982). I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I Northwest Archaeological Associates,Inc.CONTAINS CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION January 15,2007NOTFORGENERALDISTRIBUTION I I I i I I I Cultural Resources Assessment for the Proposed Lowe's of Renton Local climate conditions have been inferred from sedimentologic and pollen data retrieved from a core in Lake Washington.The basal 1.5 m of the core consisted of a blue silty clay containing the remains of marine diatoms and pine pollen accompanied by lesser amounts of spruce, mountain hemlock,and grass pollen (Leopold et al.1982).Radiocarbon age assays on organic matter contained in the clay indicate deposition prior to 13,400 years ago (Leopold et al.1982). Higher in the core overlying the clay were found partially laminated silts dating to between 13,400 and 11,000 years ago.These sediments contained progressively greater amounts of organic matter,lignin,and pollen.Only freshwater plankton were present end,together with the laminated sediments,indicate that the basin became a freshwater lake during this time period. Pollen types found in the core were dominated by pine with lesser amounts contributed by spruce and alder,and bracken fern spores,suggesting that during this time the landscape around Lake Washington was similar to present-day boreal forest settings (Leopold et al.1982). I I I I I The period after 11,000 years ago in the Puget Lowland is recorded in the Lake Washington core by an initial high influx of Douglas fir pollen accompanied by pollen from alder,Douglas fir, and grass,suggesting the overall vegetation pattern had changed to an open forest.The abundant pollen of successional plant species and the presence of charcoal suggest the landscape was subject to frequent fires.The most recent period is marked by rapid increase in western red cedar pollen beginning about 7,000 years ago immediately above a layer of Mazama ash (at about 400 cm depth below the sediment/water interface)(Leopold et al.1982). At the time the first settlers arrived in Renton and Seattle in the 1850s,the region was thickly forested.The dominant trees were Douglas fir,red cedar,and western hemlock with much less common spruce and fir.The trees were large,often 6 feet to 8 feet in diameter,and reached heights of 300 feet.Red alder and cottonwood were the only abundant deciduous trees and were limited to river flood plains and disturbed land (Davis 1973). Cultural History I I I I I Prehistory Archaeological sites and isolated finds attest to the presence of people in western Washington and southern British Columbia by at least 11,000 years ago (Carlson 1990;Matson and Coupland 1995).People living in North America during this time period are referred to as Paleoindian and the appearance of these earliest groups is distinguished by a highly distinctive projectile point style,called Clovis,notable for fluting at the base.The earliest radiocarbon ages associated with these types of points in the West date to about 12,000 years ago.Several of these points have been found west of the Cascade Mountains in Washington.A basalt fluted point was found on Whidbey Island (Shong and Miss 2002),a fluted point fashioned from chert was discovered within peat deposits near Maple Valley south of Seattle (Meltzer and Dunnell 1987;Meltzer and Dunnel11987)other finds have been found near Olympia in the southern Puget Lowland and in the Chehalis River valley (Morgan 1999;Schalk 1988).The Clovis people are believed to have been big-game hunters whose economy focused on hunting megafauna,such as the mammoth,that became extinct soon after the end of the last glaciation. I I Other early Holocene archaeological sites in western North America contain projectile points types -such as large stemmed,shouldered,and lanceolate styles -that closely follow,or are contemporaneous with,the Clovis points.In western Washington,the regional manifestation of these early Holocene economies has been termed the OIIcott Phase (Kidd 1964)also see I Northwest Archaeological Associates,Inc.CONTAINS CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION January 15,2007NOTFORGENERALDISTRIBUTION Cultural Resources Assessment for the Proposed Lowe's of Renton I I discussion in Morgan 1999)and is characterized by sites in upland settings on glacial till containing highly weathered artifacts dominated by heavy cobble spalls,scrapers and choppers. The site assemblages also contain smaller amounts of flakes,cores,finished knife blades,and stemmed and willow-leaf-shaped points (Matson and Coupland 1995;Nelson 1990). The period between about 9,000 and 4,000 years ago marks the emergence of economies devoted to utilizing resources from a broader range of environments(Matson and Coupland 1995).Archaeological sites contain artifact assemblages that are composed of medium-sized notched and contracting stem,triangular projectile points.Ground stone tools,including ground slate points,and limited stone and wood carvings begin to appear toward the end of the period, along with evidence for new fishing,sea mammal hunting,and shellfish procurement technologies (Matson and Coupland 1995). Sites dating after about 5,000 years ago are more common and indicate that the subsistence base expanded to include a broad spectrum of locally available resources that included large and small mammals,shellfish,fish,berries,roots and bulbs.Between 3,000 B.P.and 1,000 B.P.there emerged a semi-sedentary settlement pattern focused on movement between a central village and dispersed highly specialized seasonal camps.The recent phases are attested by increasingly sophisticated use of storage technology and facilities,increased population with more seasonal aggregation,and emergence of ranked societies.The final 1,000 years of coast prehistory are characterized by the development of permanent houses in central villages,a salmon-based subsistence economy,and ascribed social status (Matson and Coupland 1995;Morgan 1999). Ethnography and Ethnohistory The Seattle area was occupied by several closely affiliated groups,collectively referred to as the Duwamish,who lived in the Duwamish,Black,and Cedar River watersheds,and along the shores of Lake Washington,Lake Union,and Elliot Bay.The Duwamish wintered in permanent villages consisting of several Ionghouses built of large cedar timbers and each house occupied by several families.Villages were typically located along the lower reaches of rivers,at river mouths,and in sheltered bays.Food stored at the villages fed people during the winter,and during the spring the inhabitants dispersed to seasonal camps.Summer food consisted of salmon and other fish,bulbs,roots,berries,game,and waterfowl.Food collected during the summer was processed,dried,and then stored at the villages for winter consumption.Summer camps were shifted to different places throughout the summer as resources became available, and in the late fall,people returned to their villages (Smith 1940). Permanent settlement by non-native peoples began in the mid-nineteenth century,but prior to their arrival native populations had already been devastated by introduced diseases brought by sailors and traders.The first smallpox epidemic probably swept through Puget Sound in the middle 1700s and,along with other diseases,may have already severely reduced the population prior to the arrival of the first Euroamerican settlers.Captain Vancouver noted smallpox scars on many of the adults he encountered during his explorations of the Puget Sound in 1792 (Campbell 1989;Chatters 1981). In 1855 the Duwamish,along with the Suquamish,Sammamish,Snoqualmie,Snohomish,and other groups,signed the Treaty of Point Elliot,which forced some groups to relocate to reservations.The people living along the Black River were opposed to moving,although several moved eventually to the Port Madison and Tulalip reservations.Later,some Duwamish I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I Northwest Archaeological Associates,Inc.CONTAINS CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION January 15,2007NOTFORGENERALDISTRIBUTION I I I Cultural Resources Assessment for the Proposed Lowe'a of Renton 9 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I moved to the Muckleshoot Reservation on the White River.One group remained on the Black River in a small village,with a population estimated at 50 people in 1865,just over 0.25 mile southwest of the project area.The village had several small plank and mat houses and persisted until the early 20th century when the land was purchased in 1953 for the site of the Renton Shopping Center (Chatters 1981).Another village was at the confluence of the Cedar and Black Rivers,which is now under the Renton Airport. History Early in 1853,Henry Tobin filed the first claim in the Renton area along the Black River south of the Black-Cedar Rivers confluence,and by the end of 1853 other settlers had filed more claims along the White,Black,and Green Rivers.After Tobin died in 1856 his widow married Erasmus Smithers and added her homestead acreage to the Smithers property (Chatters 1981;Kramer et al.2001).The City of Renton was platted in 1875 on the Smithers-Tobin lands (Stein 2004), and the city was incorporated in 1901 when mining and timber harvesting were at their height. Coal was first mined in King County in 1853 on the Black River near Renton,and even though initial production levels were low,mining tonnage gradually increased and peaked between 1900 and 1920;for the state as a whole,coal output peaked in 1918 at 4 million tons.The last recorded production in the Renton area was in 1957 (Beikman et al.1961). Although Renton's early economy was based primarily on lumber and coal,early settlement in the vicinity of the project area also supported a considerable amount of small-scale subsistence farming.Rapid expansion of commercial opportunities and markets for Renton area farms and industries began with the arrival of the Northern Pacific (NP)Railroad in Tacoma in 1873,and Renton's connection to the NP in 1877 via the Seattle and Walla Walla Railroad (Lange 2004). Although coal was the primary bulk freight carried by the railroad,hops were an early large- scale agricultural commercial crop grown to take advantage of European demand.Beginning about the mid-1890s,dairying began to supplant hop production after disease and reduced demand made hop farming commercially unviable.The Smithers dairy in Renton was an active enterprise until about 1953 when the land was purchased for the Renton Shopping Center. The Boeing Company has been involved in Renton since 1922,when Boeing began using the northern end of Renton Field as the hub of the world's first international air mail service,ferrying mail between Puget Sound and Victoria,B.C.At the beginning of World War II Boeing constructed a major factory at the southern end of Lake Washington east of the Renton Field and produced 1,119 Boeing B-29 bombers for the war in the Pacific.In the 1950s the world's first successful jetliner,the Boeing 707 was built in Renton. The Boeing Company's Airplane Programs manufacturing site began in 1941 when the U.S. Government required a place to build an experimental flying boat.The Boeing Company diverted the Cedar River and began construction on a 95-acre 2.3 million square-foot plant. After the end of World War II,Boeing developed the 367-80 (the "Dash 80")prototype which was developed into the military KC-135 Stratotanker and the world's first successful commercial jetliner,the 707.In 1960 the Renton plant began work on the Boeing 727 and the 737,the most successful jetliners ever built.In 2001,40 percent of the commercial jetliners in the air began on the Renton assembly line.In 2003 Boeing consolidated the Renton facilities into a single building,and the 4.1 million square feet of building space now produces the Next-Generation 737. I Northwest Archaeological Associates,Inc.CONTAINS CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION January 15,2007NOTFORGENERALDISTRIBUTION 10 Cultural Resources Assessment for the Proposed Lowe's of Renton I I Near the junction of Garden Avenue N and Lake Washington Blvd is the location of the former Puget Sound Power and Light Company's Shuffleton Steam Plant.The plant began operation in the fall of 1929 and was the first 40,000 kilowatt generator in the region.The plant's turbo- generators initially operated using waste wood fiber from sawmills with oil-burning boiler used during emergencies (Slauson 1976).In the early 1950s the plant was placed on stand-by status for use as emergency power supply,and in 1989 Shuffieton was fired up for the last time during a severe winter storm.The plant was finally demolished in 2001 to make way for residential and commercial development at the south end of Lake Washington. Previous Archaeological Research The Cedar-Black River confluence has been the subject of multiple archaeological investigations beginning in the 1980s (Table 1).These studies have ranged from survey and archaeological resource assessments to more comprehensive data recovery excavations.The early studies were conducted under the auspices of the Office of Public Archaeology,which was affiliated with the University of Washington;later investigations were carried out in response to cultural resource regulations and have been conducted by private archaeological consulting firms in conjunction with development in the Renton urban area. The archaeological study carried out closest to the project area was at the Renton High School Site (45-KI-501)west of Burnett Avenue (Kramer et al.2001)(Table 2).Methods used in the archaeological assessment included trenching and shovel probing to find and assess buried archaeological deposits.Most of the intact culture-bearing deposits were found at the southern end of the property about three feet below the current ground surface.The archaeological layers were separated by layers of culturally sterile flood alluvium and represented several pre- contact occupations.Most of the occupation surfaces were horizontally extensive areas marked by discrete areas of burned matrix containing small fragments of charcoal,ash,and calcined fish and mammal bone.A radiocarbon assay on charcoal from one of these features returned an age ranging between 0 to 299 years before present (Kramer et al.2001). East of the Cedar River,two hearths and other archaeological materials were found in alluvial sediments during construction of the Henry Moses Aquatic Center in 2003 (Kaehler et al.2004). The first hearth was an area of charcoal-stained matrix in which no fire-modified rock was found Table 1.Previous Cultural Resource Investigations Within Approximately One Mile of the Project. AUTHOR DATE PROJECT RELATION TO APE RESULTS I I I I I I I I I I I IHodges,Charles M 2005 Cultural Resources Assessment for the Merrill Gardens 0.72 mile south None* at Renton Centre Shantry,Kate 2005 Fish Processing and Consumption on the Black River 0.7 mile south Shell mk:lden,Classification of Features at 45KI501 and 45KI51 Puget lithicsSounrl,WA Hodges,Charles M.2004 Cultural Resources Assessment for the Parkside at 95 0.7 mile south LithicsBurnettDevelopmentProject,Renton,King County,Washington Hodges,Charles M.2004 Cultural Resources Assessment for the Salvation Army .85 mile southwest NoneFoodBankWarehouse/Office Building Renton,KingCounty,Washington Juell,Kenneth E.2001 Cultural Resources Inventory of the Proposed 0.15 mile east NoneWashingtonLightLanesProject,Route 5 Backbone I I I *No new cultural materials identified within project boundaries. Northwest Archaeological Associates,Inc.January 15,2007 CONTAINS CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION NOT FOR GENERAL DISTRIBUTION I I I I Cultural Resources Assessment for the Proposed Lowe's of Renton 11 Table 2.Previously Recorded Sites Within Approximately One Mile of the Project. SITE NO.REFERENCE AGE DESCRIPTION RELATION TOPROJECTI I I I 45-KI-587 Lewarch 2004 ca.500-300 BP Pro-contact fishing site 0.85 mile southwest 45-KI-686 Lewarch 2003 Pre-contact Pre-contact hearth 0.85 mile southeast 45-KI-501 .Lewarch 2001 Pre-contact Midden;possible fishing camp and hearths 0.71 mile south 45-KI-439 1994 Pre-contact Pre-contact midden and historic refuse 1.14 mile south 45-K-174 Collins 1981 1898 Renton Substation 0.85 mile south 45-KI-538 Hudson,nd 1874 to present Columbia and Puget Sound Railroad 0.84 mile south 45-KI-209H Collins and Wisse11978 1939 Renton Fire Station 0.78 mile south 17-01744 Wisse11978 1922 Henry Ford School 0.22 mile south 45-KI-404 Mester 1989 Historic Patrol boat 0.57 mile west 45.KI-542 Norman 1996 Historic Historic dump and foundations 0.92 mile south I I I I I I I I I I I I but from which charred wood,charcoal,and hazelnut shells were collected.Radiocarbon assays on the charred wood determined the wood to be about 291 years B.P.The second hearth feature produced 21 pieces of fire-modified rock,charcoal fragments,and burnt matrix but no faunal or other botanical remains (Kaehler et al.2004). Several prehistoric sites are located along the Black River downstream (southwest)of the project area.The White Lake site (45-KI-438 and -438A),at the former confluence of the Black and Green Rivers (Lewarch et al.1996b),contained two shell-bearing cultural layers which had charcoal,fire modified rock,fish and mammal bone,and lithic artifacts.A fragment of modified bone and two pieces of folded copper believed to be associated with fishhook manufacturing were also found.Excavations at nearby 45-KI-51,which may be the ethnographic village of Sba'badi'd (Chatters 1981;see also Waterman 2001 [1920]),revealed a possible Ionghouse foundation associated with two distinct habitation areas dating to AD 1790-1825 and AD 1850- 1856,respectively.Two hundred feet away is another site,45-KI-439,where additional culture- bearing sediments,hearths,and historic artifacts were found under a parking lot.Nearby,on the opposite bank of the former Black River channel,is Tualdad A/tu (Chatters et al.1990) where hearths,midden,and artifacts were found buried beneath sterile recent alluvium. Radiocarbon ages indicate occupation was about 1,400 years ago (Chatters et al.1990; Lewarch et al.1996a). EXPECTATIONS The study area is close to a number of known late-period prehistoric archaeological sites on the Black River and is also close to recorded ethnographic/ethnohistoric villages both at the confluence of the Black and Cedar Rivers and just downstream from the project area along the Black River.It was considered highly probable that prehistoric archaeological materials would be encountered during the course of fieldwork for this project. The landscape setting of the project,close to shore-fringing wetlands along the former Lake Washington shoreline,suggested that perishable archaeological materials associated with resource collection would be well-preserved if present.Such materials would include archaeological materials related to fishing including basket traps and small channel weirs, gathering of resources such as withes and matting materials,and other tools used to capture waterfowl and fish.Such a wetland setting offer excellent preservation conditions for organic I Northwest Archaeological Associates,Inc.CONTAINS CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION January 15,2007NOTFORGENERALDISTRIBUTION 12 Cultural Resources Assessment for the Proposed Lowe's of Renton I I artifacts such as bone and wood tools,canoes,wood wedges,and other wooden artifacts as well as basketry,twists,matting,basket traps.The presence and preservation of such perishable artifacts offer valuable insights into aspects of the technology used to collect and prepare food and other resources. The probability of encountering historic features,buildings,and structural remains was considered to be moderate to low because of the substantial urban development in this portion of the Cedar River flood plain and the Lake Washington shoreline the Renton valley during World War II,and particularly since the 1940s when the Boeing Company built its assembly plant. METHODS Twenty boreholes were drilled to determine the thickness of fill and to examine the top of intact deposits underlying the fill for presence of archaeological materials.The drilling method (called sonic drilling or vibracoring)used a rapidly oscillating drill head to advance a core barrel that retrieved a continuous 4-inch-diameter core.Coring started at about 6 inches below the asphalt,the barrel was advanced to 10 feet below surface (fbs),and the resulting core sample was extruded directly from the core barrel in 2-foot increments into plastic sleeves.The sleeves were then laid out in order,split open,and logged. Sediment layers exposed in the cores were described using a lithofacies typology in which recurrent depositional units were assigned to the same facies type.Each facies type was defined on the basis of field-observable lithologic properties such as dominant grain size,bedding characteristics,and presence or absence of sedimentary structures (Mial12000).The facies types were designated with a two-part code (Table 3)in which a capital letter represented the modal grain size of the facies type (G for gravel,S for sand,and Z for silt),and lowercase letters denoted distinctive secondary properties such as texture or structure.The term peat (P)is used for deposits that consisted of at least 50 percent organic material,or for sediment whose structure was dominated by coarse Table 3.Lithofacies Naming Conventions for the Lowe's of Renton Project. PRIMARY SECONDARYLITHOLOGYPROPERTIES P-Peat z-siltyW-Detdtal s-sandyWoodg-gravellyZ-SLit b -beddedS-Sand m-massivef-fibrousw-woody rootlets or fibers (Nelson 1992).For this project the peat is treated as a histic soil and used as a surface or bounding contact marker,though it is often considered to be a geogenic process (Buol et al.1997). The boreholes were drilled in an approximate grid pattern throughout the parcel for a total of 205 linear drilled feet.Borehole placement deviated somewhat to avoid utilities,and in the northern portion of the parcel,to avoid a staging area providing emergency generating equipment logistic support for cell phone towers affected by power outages during a recent windstorm.The location of each trench was plotted on the UTM coordinate grid (Appendix A), and photographs were taken of representative sediment layers. I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I Northwest Archaeological Associates,Inc.CONTAINS CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION January 15,2007NOTFORGENERALDISTRIBUTION I I I Cultural Resources Assessment for the Proposed Lowe's of Renton 13 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I RESULTS All 20 boreholes were successfully completed (Figure 3).The boreholes were drilled to a terminating depth of 10 feet below surface (fbs) except for SC-1 which was drilled to 15 fbs.A total of 205 linear feet were drilled.Eleven lithofacies were defined and assigned to one of three groups - fill,clastic facies,or histic -depending on the dominant sediment composition of the lithofacies (Table 4). Fill Fill was ubiquitous throughout the project area,and was divided into upper and lower fills.Immediately underlying the asphalt was a reddish brown,loose, gravelly layer which ranged up to a maximum depth of 3 fbs (Figure 4).This uppermost fill layer formed the grade for the current parking lot.In most boreholes the upper fill was underlain by a gray, poorly sorted muddy sandy gravel or a dense silty Table 4.Facies Groups and Lithofacies Identified in Cores at the Lowe's of Renton Project. FACIESGROUP LITHOFACIES Consists of an upper loose gravel foundFillimmediatelyundertheparkinglotasphaltandanunderlyingolderfillof .....................a !n..g....%n..s!s!e n.c.y:.................................Sandy:S -massive sandSz-silty sandSzg-muddy gravelly sandClasticSzb-interbedded sand and siltSp-peaty sandSilty: Z -massive silt ..........................zp.:.?e.a....s.!!!.......................................Pf -fibrous peatHisticPw-woody peat Wd -wood sand which extended to 8 fbs in some boreholes.This lower fill is inferred to represent filling and grading associated with various industrial developments between the lowering of Lake Washington in 1916 and construction of the parking lot. Clastic Facies The clastic group consisted of silt and sand with varying mixtures of other size fractions.Gravel sizes,where it was a secondary constituent of sand or silt,ranged from cobble-sized gravel (rare)to fine and medium pebble-sized gravel (4-16 mm).The sand occurred in a wide range of sizes and exhibited varying degrees of sorting.When relatively gravel-free the sand tended to be moderately well-sorted,but with increasing amounts of gravel the sand became increasingly more poorly sorted and coarser-grained.The most common lithofacies among the sandy lithofacies was Szg (Figure 5),which was a silty poorly sorted sand with common (2-20%)fine pebbles (4-8 ram).Isolated nodules and fragments of silt ("rip-ups")found in the uppermost Szg layers suggest some of this facies may represent reworked glacial till brought in as fill,probably during railroad and industrial development at the base of the slope east of the project area. Figure 6 shows the proximity of the project area to the base of the slope in 1901. Silt deposits tended to be thin and massive,that is,exhibited little internal structure,and occurred either as relatively thick silt drapes at the top of fining-upward sequences or were interbedded with sand or peat layers.The sand fraction in the Zs facies tended to be very fine and was widely dispersed throughout the matrix. I Northwest Archaeological Associates,Inc.CONTAINS CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION January 15,2007NOTFORGENERALDISTRIBUTION 14 Cultural Resources Assessment for the Proposed Lowe'a of Renton I I Figure 3.Aerial photograph showing APE and Borehole locations. I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I Northwest Archaeological Associates,Inc.CONTAINS CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION January 15,2007NOTFORGENERALDISTRIBUTION I i i Cultural Resources Assessment for the Proposed Lowe's ofRenton 15 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I Figure 4.Upper fill under parking lot asphalt. Figure 5.Typical expression of silty gravelly sand (Szg). i Northwest Archaeological Associates,Inc.CONTAINS CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION January 15,2007NOTFORGENERALDISTRIBUTION 16 ..-k ,'#.... Figure 6.T-sheet,1902,showing wetlands setting of project and proximity to base of slope to east. I I I I Northwest ArchaeologicalAssociates,Inc. CONTAINS CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION January 15,2007 NOT FOR GENERAL DISTRIBUTION I I I Cultural Resources Assessment for the Proposed Lowe's of Renton 17 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I Histic Facies The histic group included fibrous peat,woody peat,and wood debris layers.The designation Pw includes organic layers with fragments of woody debris such as twigs,tree branches and portions of tree root wads.The designation Pf (Figure 7)refers to fibrous peat,but for this project it also includes organic matter layers and laminated peaty sediments.Wood (Wd)refers to layers of detrital wood fragments such as twigs or branches.As a group histic facies exhibited a high degree of internal heterogeneity and often consisted of bedded peaty sediments or interlaminated fine-grained sediments and organic peaty layers (Figure 8).Single layers of organic-rich sediments,probably representing ephemeral or weakly developed incipient peats,were found occasionally among the clastic sedimentary facies.These organic- rich layers usually occurred as thin bands of dispersed,soft plant parts or zones of organic streaking;occasionally,plant parts were dispersed throughout otherwise massive clastic sediments. Depositional Environments As shown in the north-south cross section (Figure 9)the vertical sequences exhibited in the cores revealed a high degree of place-to-place variability.Peat was found in 12 of the boreholes,typically occurred at depths below 6 fbs,and was most common in the northern two- thirds of the project area at depths ranging between 8 and 10 fbs.The depositional sequences above and underlying the peat,however,were variable and exhibited no consistent overall patterning (Figure 10).Facies found in association with peat deposits included massive sand (S),silty sand (Sz),and poorly sorted silty and gravelly sand (Szg).The inclusion of isolated silt Figure 7.Typical expression of fibrous peat (Pf). I Northwest Archaeological Associates,Inc.CONTAINS CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION January 15,2007NOTFORGENERALDISTRIBUTION 18 Cultural Resources Assessment forthe Proposed Lowe's of Renton I I Figure 8.Laminated peat and silt at about 9.5 feet below surface in SC-6. nodules (rip-ups)in Szg overlying peat and sand deposits suggest minimally that the upper five feet of deposits under the parking lot fill may represent reworked glacial deposits originating from the nearby slopes to the east and used as fill in the former lake margin wetlands. Tar-impregnated matrix and granules of coal were found in borehole SC-10 at 7.6 -9.6 fbs,and a sandy coal layer was found in SC-19 between 8.8 and 10 fbs. No archaeological materials were found. RECOMMENDATIONS Although the landscape.setting suggests potential for the presence and preservation of perishable archaeological materials,the project grading plan indicates excavation for the proposed project buildings will be shallow and confined primarily to fill.Because of the variable thickness of the fill,however,there is a chance that archaeological materials contained in intact sediments shallowly capped by fill may be inadvertently discovered during construction. NWAA recommends that an Inadvertent Discovery Plan,describing the procedures and protocols to be followed in the event of an inadvertent discovery,be drawn up and made available onsite during construction.The procedures contained in the Plan should be implemented in the event of an inadvertent discovery of archaeological materials or human remains during construction excavations.If resources are inadvertently discovered,then work I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I Northwest Archaeological Associates,Inc.CONTAINS CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION January 15,2007NOTFORGENERALDISTRIBUTION I I Cultural Resources Assessment for the Proposed Lowe's of Renton 19 =_=. ! I F...t I O L €/)€0 €,#}O') ,"1"1°1 °1 I°°1"1 °I°l ....I I ......••'°'°"I ili]i ]!il;;ii i!il .fF¢.H II ,.,.,............... #I I ,,a ,,a ""i ! I ----"""°"I°' I CONTAINS CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATIONI January 15,2007NOTFORGENERALDISTRIBUTION 20 Cultural Resources Assessment for the Proposed Lowe's of Renton I I SC-06 0.0- 1.0 //-//// /// 2.0 //,,//z j / //, //, 3.0 "/_" /,4,//j 7.0 T.: q-: 8.0 -V." q-: 9.0 °__ 10.0 -- 4.0 o'O;J "5.0g .C 121 6.0 Fill ZS Szg SC.-05 •q •I --i --| --i --| --i XlTVi '/\1 •i •i Zs Pf B Fill Fill Sp S Sz Zs Sp Wd S Pf SC..03 /// ,"/j r//Fill F J ] "// "// "....Z.-Z !•S --°Zs --•SZ •--7S 7-."_sg-r-" •S __Z 7-."_sg .+----.-- T.'_ *_Szg Fades Key: 7--" Sz -silty sand Szg -silty gravelly sand Zs -sandy silt Pf-fibrous peat VI.wood I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I Figure 10.Detail of vertical variability among borehole cores at south end of project. Northwest Archaeo/ogice/Associates,Inc.January 15,2007 CONTAINS CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION NOT FOR GENERAL DISTRIBUTION I I i !Cultural Resources Assessment for the Proposed Lowe's of Renton 21 I ! I I I I I I I I ! ! ! I I I should be stopped,and the Washington State Department of Archaeology and Historic Preservation (DAHP),Olympia,should be notified.If human remains are inadvertently discovered,then in addition to DAHP,representatives of affected tribes should also be contacted.Finally,the project should abide by all regulations pertaining to the discovery and excavation of archaeological resources. ! Northwest Archaeological Associates,Inc.CONTAINS CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION January 15,2007 NOT FOR GENERAL DISTRIBUTION I I REFERENCES CITED I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I Barnosky,Cathy W. 1985 Late Quaternary Vegetation Near Battle Ground Lake,Southern Puget Trough, Washington.Geological Society ofAmerica Bulletin 96:263-71. Beikman,Helen M.,Howard D.Gower,and Toni A.Dana 1961 Coal Reserves of Washington.Bulletin No.47,Department of Conservation,Division of Mines and Geology.Olympia,Washington. Blakely,Richard J.,Ray E.Wells,Craig S.Weaver,and Samuel Y.Johnson 2002 Location,Structure,and Seismicity of the Seattle Fault Zone,Washington:Evidence From Aeromagnetic Anomalies,Geologic Mapping,and Seismic-Reflection Data. Geological Society of America Bulletin 114:169-77. Booth, 1994 Derek B.and Barry Goldstein Patterns and Processes of Landscape Development by the Puget Lobe Ice Sheet.In Regional Geology of Washington State,edited by R.Lasmanis and E.S.Cheney,pp. 207-218.Washington State Department of Natural Resources Division.Olympia, Washington. Borden,Richard K.and Kathy G.Troost 2001 Late Pleistocene Stratigraphy in the South-Central Puget Lowland,Pierce County, Washington.Washington Department of Natural Resources Division of Geology and Earth Resources.Olympia,Washington. Buol,S.W.,F.D.Hole,R.J.McKracken,and R.J.Southard 1997 Soil Genesis and Classification.4th Edition.Iowa State University Press.Ames,Iowa. Campbell,Sarah K. 1989 Postcolumbian Culture History in the Northern Columbia Plateau:A.D.1500-1900. Seattle,Washington,University of Washington. Carlson,Roy L. 1990 History of Research in Archaeology.In Handbook of North American Indians,Volume 7: Northwest Coast,edited by W.Suttles,pp.107-115.Smithsonian Institution. Washington,D.C. Chatters,James C. 1981 Archaeology of the Sbabadid Site,45KI51,King County,Washington.Prepared for CHG International.Office of Public Archaeology,Institute for Environmental Studies, University of Washington,Seattle,Washington. Chatters,James C.,D.E.Rhode,and K.A.Hoover 1990 Tualdad Altu (45KI59):A Prehistoric Riverine Village in Southern Puget Sound. Archaeology in Washington 1:23-48. Chrzastowski,Michael 1983 Historical Changes to Lake Washington and Route of the Lake Washington Ship Canal, King County,Washington.U.S.Geological Survey.Washington,D.C. I Northwest Archaeological Associates,Inc.CONTAINS CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION 23 January 15,2007NOTFORGENERALDISTRIBUTION 24 Cultural Resources Assessment for the Proposed Lowe's of Renton I i Collins,Brian D.,Amir J.Sheikh,and Charles Kiblinger 2003 Historical River Channel Location Data for the Cedar River,RM 0 --RM 22,King County,Washington.Prepared for King County Department of Natural Resources and Parks.Department of Earth and Space Sciences,University of Washington,Seattle. Crandell,Dwight R.and Robert D.Miller 1974 Quaternary Stratigraphy and Extent of Glaciation in the Mount Rainier Region, Washington.U.S.Geological Survey Professional Paper 847.Washington D.C. Davis,Margaret B. 1973 Pollen Evidence of Changing Land Use Around the Shores of Lake Washington. Northwest Science 47:133-48. Dethier,D.P.,Fred Jr.Pessl,R.F.Keuler,M.A.Balzarini,and D.R.Pevear 1995 Late Wisconsin Glaciomarine Deposition and Isostatic Rebound,Northern Puget Lowland,Washington.Geological Society of America Bulletin 107:1288-303. Dragovich,Joe D.,Patrick T.Pringle,and Timothy J.Walsh 1994 Extent and Geometry of the Mid-Holocene Osceola Mudflow in the Puget Lowland - Implications for Holocene Sedimentation and Paleogeography.Washington Geology 22:3-26. Evans,Stephen H.and Roy E.Jensen 1996 Geohydrologic Review of the Cedar River Ground-Water Basin.Washington Geology 24:3-13. Franklin,Jerry F.and C.T.Dyrness 1973 Natural Vegetation of Oregon and Washington.Pacific Northwest Forest and Range Experiment Station,Forest Service,U.S.Department of Agriculture.U.S.Government Printing Office,Washington D.C. Frenkel,R.E and E.F.Heinitz 1987 Composition and Structure of Oregon Ash (Fraxinus Latifolia)Forest in William L.Finley National Wildlife Refuge,Oregon.Northwest Science 61:203-12. Galster,Richard W.and William T.Laprade 1991 Geology of Seattle,Washington,United States of America.Bulletin of the Association of Engineering Geologists 28:239-302. Kaehler,Gretchen A.,Stephanie E.Trudel,Dennis E.Lewarch,and Lynn L.Larson 2004 Data Recovery Excavations at the Henry Moses Aquatic Center Site (45KI686),Renton, King County,Washington.Prepared for Community Services,City of Renton.Larson Anthropological Archaeological Services Limited,LAAS Technical Report #2003-09.Gig Harbor,Washington. Kidd,Robert S. 1964 A Synthesis of Western Washington Prehistory From the Perspective of Three Occupation Sites.Seattle,Washington,University of Washington. I I i i I I I I I I I I I I I I Northwest Archaeological Associates,Inc.CONTAINS CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION January 15,2007NOTFORGENERALDISTRIBUTION i i I Cultural Resources Assessment for the Proposed Lowe's of Renton 25 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I Kramer,Stephanie,Leonard A.Forsman,Lewarch Dennis E.,and Lynn L.Larson 2001 Renton High School Archaeological Resources and Traditional Cultural Places Assessment,King County,Washington.Prepared for Renton School District No.403. Larson Anthropological Archaeological Services Limited,LAAS Technical Report #2001- 23.Gig Harbor,Washington. Kruckeberg,Arthur R. 1991 The Natural History of Puget Sound Country.University of Washington Press.Seattle. Lange,Greg 2004 Seattle &Walla Walla Railroad runs first train on March 7,1877.Web Page: http://www,historylin k.org/_output.cfm?file_id=755.Accessed Leopold,Estella B.,Rudy Nickmann,John I.Hedges,and John R.Ertel 1982 Pollen and Lignin Records of Late Quaternary Vegetation,Lake Washington.Science 218:1305-7. Lewarch,Dennis E.,Eric W.Bangs,and Lynn L.Larson 1996a Cultural Resources Assessment of the Schneider Homes Renton Apartments Project, Renton,King County,Washington.Prepared for Schneider Homes,Inc.Larson Anthropological Archaeological Services,Letter Report.Gig Harbor,Washington. Lewarch,Dennis E.,Lynn L.Larson,Leonard A.Forsman,Guy F.Moura,Eric W.Bangs,and Paula Mohr Johnson 1996b King County Department of Natural Resources,Water Pollution Control Division,Alki Transfer/CSO Project:Allentown Site (45KI431)and White Lake Site (45KI438 and 45KI438A)Data Recovery.Prepared for King County Department of Natural Resources, Water Pollution Control Division,Seattle,Washington.Larson Anthropological/Archaeological Services,LAAS Technical Report #95-8.Seattle, Washington. Liesch,Bruce A.,Charles E.Price,and Kenneth L.Waiters 1963 Geology and Ground-Water Resources of Northwestern King County,Washington. Water Supply Bulletin No.20.Division of Water Resources,Department of Conservation.Olympia,Washington. Matson,R.G.and G.C.Coupland 1995 The Prehistory of the Northwest Coast.Academic Press.San Diego,California. Meltzer,David J.and Robert C.Dunnell 1987 Fluted Point From the Pacific Northwest.Current Research in the Pleistocene 4:64-67. Miall,Andrew D. 2000 Principles of Sedimentary Basin Analysis.Springer-Verlag.Berlin. Morgan,Vera E.editor 1999 The SR-IOf Sequim Bypass Archaeological Project:Mid-to Late-Holocene Occupations on the Northern Olympic Peninsula,Clallam County,Washington. Prepared for Washington Department of Transportation.Archaeological and Historical Northwest Archaeological Associates,Inc.January 15,2007 i CONTAINS CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION NOT FOR GENERAL DISTRIBUTION 26 Cultural Resources Assessment for the Proposed Lowe's of Renton i i Services,Eastern Washington University,Cheney,Eastern Washington University Reports in Archaeology and History 100-108.Cheney,Washington. Mullineaux,Donal R. 1970 Geology of the Renton,Auburn,and Black Diamond Quadrangles,King County, Washington.U.S.Geological Survey,Professional Paper 672.Washington,D.C. Nelson,A.R.1992 Discordant 14C Ages From Buried Tidal-Marsh Soils in the Cascadia Subduction Zone, Southern Oregon Coast.Quaternary Research 38:74-90. Nelson,Charles N. 1990 Prehistory of the Puget Sound Region.In Handbook of North American Indians,Volume 7:The Northwest Coast,edited by W.Suttles,pp.481-484.Smithsonian Institution. Washington,D.C. Perkins,Susan J. "The Shrinking Cedar River -Channel Changes Following Flow Regulation and Bank Armoring".Web Page.Accessed 15 Aug 2004. http:llgeopacific.comlPerkinslcedtextl .htm. Porter,Stephen C.and Terry W.Swanson 1998 Radiocarbon Age Constraints on Rates of Advance and Retreat of the Puget Lobe of the Cordilleran Ice Sheet During the Last Glaciation.Quaternary Research 50:205-13. Schalk,Randall F. 1988 The Evolution and Diversification of Native Land Use Systems on the Olympic Peninsula.Prepared for National Park Service.Institute for Environmental Studies, University of Washington,Seattle,Washington. Shimel,Scott,Derek Booth,and Kathy Troost 2003 Seattle Composite Geologic Map.Seattle-Area Geologic Mapping Project.University of Washington,Seattle. Shong,Michael and Christian J.Miss 2002 Cultural Resources Investigations of the Proposed Hamilton Sand and Grave/Mine, Skagit County,Washington.Prepared for Centennial Resources,LLC.Northwest Archaeological Associates,Seattle,Washington. Slauson,Morda C. 1976 Renton -From Coal to Jets.Renton Historical Society.Renton,Washington. Smith,Marian W. 1940 The Puyallup-Nisqually.Columbia University Press.New York. Stein,Alan J. 2004 Renton -Thumbnail History.Web Page: http://www.historylink.org/_output.CFM?file_lD=688.Accessed January 2007 ! I I I ! I I I I I i I I I I i Northwest Archaeological Associates,Inc.CONTAINS CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION January 15,2007NOTFORGENERALDISTRIBUTION i I I Cultural Resources Assessment for the Proposed Lowe's of Renton 27 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I Thorson,Robert M.and Leopold,Estella 2004 Shoreline Transgression and Crustal Motion at Lake Washington.Web Page:http://erp- web.er.usgs.govlreportslannsumlvo1381.Accessed January 2007 Tsukada,M. 1982 Pseudotsuga Menziesii (MIRB)Fanco:Its Pollen Dispersal and Late Quaternary History in the Pacific Northwest.Japanese Journal of Ecology 32:159-87. Waterman,Thomas T. 200111920]Puget Sound Geography [Edited With Additional Material From Vi Hilbert,Jay Miller,and Zalmai Zahir].Zahir Consulting Services/Lushootseed Press.Federal Way,Washington. Whitlock,Cathy 1992 Vegetational and Climatic History of the Pacific Northwest During the Last 20,000 Years: Implications for Understanding Present-Day Biodiversity.The Northwest Environmental Journal 8:5-28. Yount,J.C.,J.P.Minard,and G.R.Dembroff 1993 Geologic Map of Surficial Deposits in the Seattle 30 x 60 Quadrangle.OFR 93-233.U. S.Geological Survey.Washington,D.C. I Northwest Archaeological Associates,Inc.CONTAINS CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION January 15,2007NOTFORGENERALDISTRIBUTION I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I APPENDIX A:Borehole Depth Summary and Photo Catalog I Northwest Archaeological Associates,Inc. CONTAINS CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION A-1 January 15,2007NOTFORGENERALDISTRIBUTION I I Table A-1. BH ID Summan/of Borehole Drillinl Depths. EASTING*NORTHING*TOTAL DEPTH(feet) 1 560401 5260696 15 2 560440 5260706 10 3 560480 5260717 10 4 560475 5260748 10 5 560425 5260754 10 6 560385 6260717 10 7 560346 5260898 10 8 560347 5260955 10 9 560382 5260976 10 10 560385 5260899 10 11 560370 5260752 10 12 560405 5260766 10 13 560437 5260768 10 14 560453 5260796 10 15 560410 5260788 10 16 560368 5260768 10 17 560368 5260804 10 18 560420 5260833 10 19 560450 5260833 10 20 560422 5260862 10 Total:20 boreholes 2051inearfeet I I *UTM NAD27,Zone 10N Table A-2.Photolraph Catalol. EXPOSURENUMBER DESCRIPTION I I l I I Roll 1220 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 5O 51 52 53 Roll 1221 54 55 Oventiew of parcel to north from south edge of parcel. SC 1 :top of peat at 96 inches bs;upper peat. SC 1:lower peat. SC 3:possible liquefaction feature (core top is at bottom of photo). SC 4:possible liquefaction feature 68°84 inches bs (core top at top of photo). SC 5:overview,bottom of core. SC 5:overview,middle of core. SC 5:overview,top of core. SC 6:core base;laminated sand and peat. SC 8:core base;peat. SC 12:core base;peat, SC 15:base of core. SC 16:base of core. I I I Northwest Archaeological Associates,Inc. CONTAINS CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION A-3 January 15,2007 NOT FOR GENERAL DISTRIBUTION I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I DEVELOPMENT PLANNINGCITYOFRENTON DEC 1 2005 RECEIVED Lowe's of Renton Renton,Washington Preliminary Storm Drainage Analysis |s I December 14,2005 11235 SE 6h Street,Bellevue,Washington 98004 (425)435-9501 FAX:(425)453208 EiViAIL:pacland@pacland.conl Prepared By:John Hanson &Steve Pesce Reviewed By:Paul Manzer,P.E. (RNLO-stm.doc) I Preliminary Storm Drainage Analysis Renton,WA Table of Contents Section Page I I I I I I I I I I I I l I I I Executive Summary ...............................................................................................................2 Stormwater Drainage Report ................................................................................................2 1.Project Location .........................................................................................................3 2.Project Overview .......................................................................................................4 a.Existing Condition b.Discharge at Natural (Existing)Location c.Soils Conditions d.Wells,Septic Tanks and Fuel Tanks e.Proposed Development 3.Conditions and Requirements Summary ......................................................................5 4.Off-Site Analysis .........................................................................................................7 a.Downstream Analysis b.Upstream Analysis 5.Drainage Analysis.......................................................................................................8 a.Hydrologic Modeling Method b.Sub-Basin Description -. c.Peak Runoff Control d.Water Quality e.Conveyance f.100-Year Flood/Overflow Condition 6.Erosion Control ........................................................................................................11 7.Maintenance ............................................................................................................13 8.Covenants,Dedications,and Easements ....................................................................16 Technical Information Report (TIR)Worksheet ...................................................................18 Appendix A Figures ...............................................................................................21 Figure A1 -ALTA/ACSM Land Title Survey of the Property Figure A2 -Site Plan Figure A3 -Grading and Drainage Plan Figure A4 -King County GIS Map Figure A5 -SCS/USDA Soils Map Figure A6 -Basin Map Figure A7 -2-year,24-hour Isopluvial Figure A8 -10-year,24-hour Isopluvial Figure A9 -24-year,24-hour Isopluvial Appendix B Existing Site Hydrology Output Data\Calculations .............................30 Appendix C Developed Site Hydrology Output Data\Calculations ........................31 PACLAND Job #2005127.014.00 Page 1 I Preliminary Storm Drainage Analysis Renton,WA Executive Summary Site Location: The property is located at the southeast corner of the intersection of Park Avenue North and Garden Avenue North,in the City of Renton,Washington.The site presently is essentially entirely paved and is an abandoned Boeing parking lot.This project proposes to reuse the site by developing a 128,289 square foot retail store and a 29,712 square foot garden center with its associated paving,utilities,storm drainage and landscaping improvements on this 9.79-acre site. Design Criteria: The City of Renton utilizes a modified version of the 1990 King County Surface Water Design Manual (KC-SWDM).As this project will decrease the amount of impervious surface and decrease the peak runoff for the 2-year,10-year,and 1OO-year storm events, therefore detention will not be required.Water quality and conveyance design will be addressed through KC-SWDM as summarized below. Table 1 Jurisdictional Requirements Peak Run-off Control:None required Water Quality: Conveyance Design: Downstream Analysis: Level 1: Treat the 2-year,24-hour event Convey the 25-year,24-hour event ¼mile downstream Proposed Drainage System: This project proposes to replace the existing drainage system with a new network of underground pipes,catch basins,and curbs and gutter,to collect surface water runoff throughout the site and direct it to a compost stormwater filtration system for water quality treatment.Since runoff from the roof of the building is not contaminated,it will bypass the water quality system and will be directly discharged into the 72"storm drain.The contaminated runoff will be treated and then discharged into the 72 storm drain pipe under Garden Ave N. Conclusion: The proposed stormwater management system for this project has been designed in accordance with regulatory criteria described above and consistent with sound engineering practice.This design has reduced the peak runoff from the existing condition and incorporated stormwater quality BMP's.Therefore,no significant adverse impacts to the stormwater management system are expected as a result of this proposed development. PACLAN D Job #2005127.O14.00 Page 2 Preliminary Storm Drainage Analysis Renton,WA l I I I I I I l I l l I i I ! I I Project location z Location:Southeast corner of Park Ave N and Garden Ave N,Renton,WA Section NW ¼Sec.8,T.23N,R.5E of W.M. Parcel Lot:.082305-9217 Size:9.79 acres City,County,State:City of Renton,King County,Washington Governing Agency:City of Renton Design Criteria:1990 King County Surface Water Design Manual (KC-SWDM) •] PACLAN D Job #200S 127.014.00 Page 3 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I1: Preliminary Storm Drainage Analysis Renton,WA Project Overview Existing Conditions The topographic survey indicates that the existing site presently is an abandoned parking lot,and the site is virtually paved in its entirety.Storm runoff sheets across the property from the east into onsite catch basins on the western side,where it is then conveyed offsite through a 24"pipe that outfalls into the 72"public storm system in Garden Ave N.In accordance with the 1990 KC-SWDM,the existing condition of the site will be used to calculate the existing runoff condition.A curve number of 98 has been assigned to the entire site as it is completely paved. Table 2 Existing Conditions Area Condition CN 9.79 AC Paved 98 Discharge at Natural (Existing)Location Stormwater presently discharges through a storm drain located on the western side of the site into the 72"storm pipe under Garden Ave N.The post development system will discharge into this same 72"storm pipe in two locations,within a few hundred feet of the existing discharge point.Please see the downstream analysis for more information. Soils Conditions The site surface soils are classified by The United States Departments of Agriculture Soil Survey for King County,Washington,to be the Urban Complex (Ur)(See attached Figures AS).In regards to hydrology,this soil complex is described by the Natural Resources Conservation Service (NRCS)to be relatively impervious and hence has a SCS Soil Hydrologic Group class of "D". Wells,Septic Tanks and Fuel Tanks Based upon field reconnaissance it appears that no fuel tanks,wells or septic tanks are presently located on the property.If at a later date any tanks are discovered on the property,they will be removed in accordance with all regulatory requirements,local,state and federal. Proposed Development Project proposes to redevelop this site with an approximately 128,300 square foot retail store and an approximately 29,700 square foot garden center with its associated paving, utilities,storm drainage and landscaping improvements.This development will result in a decrease in impervious surfaces on the site and will provide additional stormwater treatment for the runoff.The table below summarizes the proposed surface areas. PACLAND Job #2005127.014.00 Page 4 Preliminary Storm Drainage Analysis Renton,WA I I I I ! I I I I I I I I ! I I I I Table 3 Proposed Conditions Area Condition CN 5.75 Paved 98 0.86 Irrigated Landscaping 92 3.19 Rooftop 98 In the developed condition,storm runoff will sheet flow over the proposed asphalt paving to strategically placed catch basins.The runoff from asphalt paving will then be conveyed though storm drains to a compost stormwater filter for treatment before disposal.The site is further divided into three basins: •Basin "POST-ROOF"is the roof area of the proposed retail building.Runoff from here will be separately conveyed,without treatment,to a discharge point on the northwest side of the site. •Basin "POST-N"occupies areas to the rear (north side)of the building.This basin area will be conveyed though a compost stormwater filter to discharge into the 72" stormwater pipe. •Basin "POST-S"is the rest of the site that occupies areas to the south of the building. This basin area will be conveyed though a compost stormwater filter to discharge into the 72"stormwater pipe. These basins are highlighted in figure A6 and the runoff calculations are also found in the drainage analysis section and the appendix. Conditions and Requirements Summary As required by the City of Renton,storm drainage design for this project complies with the King County Surface Water Design Manual (KC-SWDM).For this proposed retail project,a full drainage review is required as the project is expected to cost more than $500,000 and to replace more than 5,000 SF of on-site impervious area.Hence all five core requirements and all five special requirements listed in KC-SWDM will be met.These requirements are addressed below. Core Requirement No.1:Discharge of the Natural Location:The drainage produced from the proposed project site must occur at the natural location. Response:The property drains from the parking lot drainage pipes to the public drainage system located in Garden Ave N.The system eventually outfalls into Lake Washington.In essence,the site's natural point of discharge is in the 72"pipe under Garden Ave N,which will be maintained during this project. Core Requirement No.2:Off-site Analysis:All proposed projects must identify the upstream tributary drainage area and perform a downstream analysis,the level of analysis required depending on the problem identified or predicted. Response:As stated in the off-site analysis,there is no significant off-site source of tributary runoff from the adjoining properties.Based on our site and upstream/downstream analysis,no evidence of runoff problems (flooding,erosion,conveyance)was PACLAN D Job #2005127.014.00 Page 5 I Preliminary Storm Drainage Analysis Renton,WA I I I I [I II I I I I I I I I I I I I encountered.This project will maintain the site's current runoff characteristics;therefore, a more involved analysis of the downstream is not necessary. Core Requirement No.3:Proposed project must provide runoff control to limit the developed condition peak rate of runoff to the existing peak rate for a specific design storm event based on the proposed project site's existing runoff condition,and install biofiltration measure. Response:The King County Surface Water Design Manual allows an increase of 0.40 cfs beyond current conditions before requiring a controlled release (retention/detention).The proposed peak runoff is less than the existing peak runoff.Therefore,detention/retention would not be required.The project does propose to provide treatment of runoff from paved surfaces via a compost stormwater filter. Core Requirement No.4:Conveyance System:All new conveyance systems for a proposed project must be analyzed,designed,and constructed for existing tributary off-site runoff and developed on-site runoff from the proposed project. Response:All new pipe systems will be designed to convey the 25-year storm peak flow. An analysis will be performed to provide for an overflow route of the 100-year runoff event to prevent on-site flooding or erosion. Core Requirement No.5:Erosion /Sedimentation Control Plan:All engineering plans for the proposed project that propose to construct new,or modify existing drainage facilities, must include a plan to provide all measures for the control of erosion and sedimentation during construction and to permanently stabilize soils exposed during construction. Response:Erosion and sediment control requirements as out lined in the KC-SWDM will be an integral part of the project documents.These measures will include methods to reduce erosion of onsite site soils and to prevent sediments from inadvertently leaving the project site. Special requirement #I:Other Adopted Area-Specific Requirement Response:At this time,this site does not fall under any other known Adopted Area-Specific Requirements. Special requirement #2:Floodplain Delineation Response:This project does not contain nor is it adjacent to any stream,lakes or closed depressions;and is not situated within the lO0-year floodplain,hence a floodplain / floodway delineation is not required. Special requirement #3:Flood Protection Facilities Response:This project is not located near a Class 1 or 2 stream and does not propose to modify or construct a flood protection facility. Special requirement #4:Source Controls Response:Water quality source control will be utilized during the operation of the completed project in accordance with the King County Stormwater Pollution Control Manual. Special requirement #5:Oil Control PACLAND Job #2005127.014.00 Page 6 I I I I I I I I I I I I I ! I: Preliminary Storm Drainage Analysis Renton,WA Off-Site Anal vsis I Response:This site does not fall under the requirements for oil control as the vehicular use area is being reduced by 4.73 acres.However,the runoff from the areas other than the roof will be routed through a compost stormwater filter designed to treat the runoff from the 2-year 24-hour rainfall event. In accordance with the KC-SWDM and to verify the suitability of the onsite site improvements,a level one analysis was performed.This involves studying the watershed conveyance path about ¼mile along the upstream and downstream of the site to check for conditions,such as flooding or excessive erosion,that might indicate that additional standards are required. Downstream Analysis USGS Maps and the King County GIS System show that runoff from the project eventually outfalls into Lake Washington,approximately 0.45 miles downstream.The project site occupies only a fraction of the Lake Washington drainage basin. Under existing and proposed conditions,the site drains to a 72-inch storm drain under Garden Ave N.This pipe daylights downstream between Park Ave N and Lake Washington Blvd N.The stormwater then crosses Lake Washington Blvd N in two 48-inch culverts and discharges into a right of way ditch.The final approximately 0.3 miles of conveyance before discharging into Lake Washington is through a series of ditches and culverts known as John's Creek. It is assumed that the system will be able to accommodate the flows from this project since the site is currently paved in it's entirety with no water quality treatment or rate control structures.In the developed condition there would be a small percentage of pervious landscape area and a stormwater quality facility. Upstream Analysis The project site is essentially isolated from off-site runoff.Runoff from the north is diverted by the Park Avenue over pass with a small portion of runoff coming from the vegetated slope on the southern side of the over pass.Runoff from the east is intercepted by the trackside swale for the railroad.The site does not receive any runoff from the adjacent parking lot to the south and the topography on-site drains from the east to the west, therefore,there is no drainage contributing from west of the property. PACLAND Job #2005127.014.00 Page 7 Preliminary Storm Drainage Analysis Renton,WA I I I I I I I I I I I I l I I I I I Drainage Analysis Hydrologic Modeling Method Hydrologic analysis of the project area was performed using the computer-modeling program "StormSHED2G release 7.0.0.9",which uses the Santa Barbara Urban Hydrograph (SBUH)methodology.The program effectively models pre-developed and developed runoff conditions using hydrographs for each basin.Given a specified design storm (precipitation value)and its associated distribution,the computer model calculates runoff hydrographs in terms of peak rates and total volume based on the approximated characteristics of the basin (i.e.area,curve number (CN),time of concentration (Tc),etc.). The StormSHED software program has been designed to enable the user to route the hydrographs generated from the basin analysis through a proposed conveyance system and/or detention facility.The modeled peak flows and volumes were used in the analysis of the proposed drainage system. For this project the following model parameters were inputted into the StormSHED program to size the proposed stormwater facilities: PACLAND Job #2005127.014.00 Page 8 Preliminary Storm Drainage Analysis Renton,WAI I I I I I I I I I I I! Rain Fall Distribution:24-hour Type 1A distribution Hydrograph Interval:10 minutes Peak Factor:484 Tp Factor:4 Table 4 Precipitation Values Storm Event Rainfall Amount (inches) 2.02-yr,24-hr 10-yr,24-hr 25-yr,24-hr 100-yr,24-hr 2.9 3.5 3.9 Sub-Basin Description For purposes of analysis,the existing property has been divided into three drainage basins: •Basin "POST-ROOF"is the roof area of the proposed retail building.Runoff from here will be separately conveyed,without treatment,to a discharge point on the northwest side of the site. •Basin "POST-N"occupies areas to the rear (north side)of the building.This basin area will be conveyed though a compost stormwater filter to discharge into the 72" stormwater pipe. •Basin "POST-S"is the rest of the site that occupies areas to the south of the building. This basin area will be conveyed though a compost stormwater filter to discharge into the 72"stormwater pipe. Refer to figure #A6 in the appendix for an illustration of the site. Also,there will be a small amount of runoff from the landscaped area between the building and Garden Ave N that will flow off of the property.This is why the "Landscaping"area in the proposed conditions model doesn't equal the total pervious area for the site.To stay conservative that area was added into the post basins as impervious area. Peak Runoff Control As the proposed site will have a peak runoff rate less than the existing site,storm water detention wilt not be required,nor provided per the 1990 KC-SWDM.Complete analysis is included in the Appendix.A basic summary of inputs/outputs is as follows: Table 5 Basin 1 Existing Conditions Paving Landscaping (acres)-(acres)-CN=98 CN=92 9.79 0 Composite Total TC 2-year 24-lO-year 24-100-yearAreahourEventhourEvent24-hourCN(min)(acres)(CFS)(CFS)Event (CFS) 98 9.79 8.01 4.35 6.44 8.75 PACLAN D Job #2005127.014.00 Page 9 I Preliminary Storm Drainage Analysis Renton,WA I Table 6 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I Basin POST-N POST-S POST- ROOF Paving Landscaping (acres)-:(acres)- CN=98 CN=92 1.31 .21 4.97 .35 0.00 0.00 *Soils Type D per soils Proposed Conditions Roof Total (acres)-Composite AreaCNCN--98 0.00 97.17 0.00 97.61 2.95 98.0 TC (min)(acres) 1.52 9.96 5.32 6.98 2.95 5.27 2-year 10-year 100-year 24-hour 24-hour 24-hour Event Event Event (CFS)(CES)(CFS) 0.6.5 0.97 1.33 2.32 3.46 4.71 1.31 1.94 2.64 Water Quality The 2-year 24-hour event runoff from paved surfaced will be treated via a compost stormwater filter.The stormwater system will be designed such that any flows above the treatment flow of the 2-year 24-hour storm will be routed around the treatment system and directly discharged into the 72"storm drainage pipe. Conveyance For conveyance design,Uniform Flow Analysis utilizing Manning's equation will be employed with a Manning's "n"value of 0.014. Manning's equation -Q =1.49/n xAxRJ3xS '/2 With:Q =Flow (CFS) n Manning's Roughness Coefficient (0.014) A --Flow Area (SF) R =Hydraulic Radius Area/Wetted Perimeter (LF) S =Slope of the pipe (ft/ft) All storm pipes will be designed and checked for capacity during the 25-year event and to meet the minimum full flow velocity of 3 fps as required by KC-SWDM. l O0-Year Flood Condition The stormwater system for this project has been designed to address all storm events in accordance with design criteria described previously.In the event of a storm larger than the 100-yr 24-hr the system my overflow into the public right-of-way.Based on our review,we anticipate the overflow of the stormwater drainage system would allow surface water to discharge directly to the public storm system along Garden Ave N. PACLAN D Job #2005127.014.00 Page 10 Preliminary Storm Drainage Analysis Renton,WA I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I Erosion Control All erosion and sediment control measures shall be governed by the requirements of King County and the City of Renton.A temporary erosion and sedimentation control plan will be prepared to assist the contractor in complying with these requirements.Typical temporary erosion and sedimentation control measures and procedures are listed below. Construction Sequence And Procedure The proposed development will include an erosion/sedimentation control plan designed to prevent sediment-laden run-off from leaving the site during construction.The erosion potential of the site is influenced by four major factors:soil characteristics,vegetative cover,topography,and climate.Erosion/sedimentation control is achieved by a combination of structural measures,cover measures,and construction practices that are tailored to fit the specific site. Prior to the start of any grading activity upon the site,all erosion control measures, including installation of a stabilized construction entrance,shall be installed in accordance with the construction documents. The best construction practice will be employed to properly clear and grade the site and to schedule construction activities.The planned construction sequence for the construction of the site is as follows: 1.Flag and stake clearing limits. 2.Arrange and attend a preconstruction meeting with the City of Renton. 3.Install perimeter erosion control features (silt fence,construction entrance etc.) 4.Field locate all utilities. 5.Clear/demo and grub site. 6.Grade the site. 7.Install sanitary sewers,storm,water,and other site utilities;provide CB inlet protection at the new inlet locations. 8.Install permanent stormwater treatment system to be brought "on-line"upon completion of permanent storm system and approved by the governing jurisdiction engineer. 9.Thoroughly clean new storm system upon completion of paving to prevent sediment from leaving the site. 10.Remove temporary erosion control facility upon stabilization of entire project site, as approved by governing jurisdiction and project engineer. PACLAND Job #2005127.014.00 Page 11 I Preliminary Storm Drainage Analysis Renton,WA I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I II I I Trapping Sediment Structural control measures will be used to reduce erosion and retain sediment on the construction site.The control measures will be selected to fit specific site and seasonal conditions. The following structural items will be used to control erosion and sedimentation processes: •Stabilized construction entrance •Temporary gravel construction entrance •Filter fabric fences •Cover measures Weekly inspection of the erosion control measures will be required during construction. Any sediment buildup shall be removed and disposed off site. Vehicle tracking of mud off-site shall be avoided.Installation of a gravel construction entrance will be installed at a location to enter the site.The entrances are a minimum requirement and may be supplemented if tracking of mud onto public streets becomes excessive.In the event that mud is tracked off site,it shall be swept up and disposed off site on a daily basis.Depending on the amount of tracked mud,a vehicle road sweeper may be required. Because vegetative cover is the most important form of erosion control,construction practices must adhere to stringent cover requirements.More specifically,the contractor will not be allowed to leave soils open for more than 7 days and,in some cases,immediate seeding will be required.During the period of November 1st through April 30'h,all disturbed soil areas will be stabilized within seven days.Areas next to paved areas may be armored with crushed rock subbase in place of other stabilizing measures. PACLAND Job #2005127.014.00 Page 12 Preliminary Storm Drainage Analysis Renton,WA I I I Maintenance Maintain Stormwater Facilities The owner or operator of the project shall be responsible for maintaining the stormwater facilities in accordance with local requirements.Proper maintenance is important for adequate functioning of the stormwater facilities.The following maintenance program is recommended for this project: I I I I I I I I I I I I I I NO.5 -CATCH BASINS Maintenance Defect or Problem Conditions When Maintenance is Needed Results Expected When Component Maintenance is peffon'ned General Trash &Debds (includes Sediment) Trash or debris of more than ½cubic foot whichislocatedimmediatelyinfrontofthecatchbasin opening or is blocking capacity of the basin by more than 10%. No Trash or debris locatedimmediatelyinfrontofcatch basin opening. Trash or debris (in the basin)that exceeds d3 the No trash or debds in the catch depth from the bottom of basin to invert the basin. lowest pipe into or out of the basin. Trash or debris in any inlet or outlet pipe blocking Inlet and outlet pipes free of trash or more than d3 of its height,debds. Dead animals or vegetation that could generate No dead animals or vegetation odors that could cause complaints or dangerous present within the catch basin. gases (e.g..methane). Deposits of garbage exceeding 1 cubic foot in No condition present which would volume,attract or support the breeding of insects or rodents. Structure Damage to Comer of frame extends more than ¾inch past Frame is even with curb. Frame and/orTop ;curb face into the street (If applicable). Slab Top slab has holes larger than 2 square inches Top slab is free of holes and cracks. or cracks wider than ¼inch (intent is to make sure all material is running into basin). Frame not sitting flush on top slab,i.e,,Frame is sitting flush on top slab. separation of more than ¾inch of the frame from the top slab. Cracks in Basin Cracks wider than ½inch and longer than 3 feet.Basin replaced or repaired to design Walls/Bottom any evidence of soil particles entedng catch standards. basin through cracks,or maintenance person judges that structure is unsound. Cracks wider than ½inch and longer than 1 foot No cracks more than t/4 inch wide at at the joint of any inlet/ootlet pipe or any the joint of inleVouflet pipe. evidence of soil particles entering catch basin through cracks. Settlement/Basin has settled more than 1 inch or has rotated Basin replaced or repaired to design Misalignment more than 2 inches out of alignment,standards. Fire Hazard Presence of chemicals such as natural gas,oil No flammable chemicals present. and gasoline. PACLAND Job #2005127.014.00 Page 13 Preliminary Storm Drainage Analysis Renton,WA Vegetation No vegetation blocking opening to basin.I I I I i I I I I Vegetation growing across and blocking morethan10%of the basin opening. Vegetation growing in inlet/ouflet pipe joints that No vegetation or root growth is more than 6 inches tall and less than 6 inches present. aped. Pollution Nonflammable chemicals of more than Y2 cubic No pollution present other than foot per three feet of basin length,surface film. Catch Basin Cover Cover Not in Place Cover is missing or only partially in place.Any Catch basin cover is closed open catch basin requires maintenance. Locking Mechanism Mechanism cannot be opened by on Mechanism opens with proper tools. Not Working maintenance person with proper tools.Bolts into frame have less than ½inch of thread. Cover Difficult to One maintenance person cannot remove lid after Cover can be removed by one Remove applying 80 Ibs.of lift;intent is keep cover from maintenance person. sealing off access to maintenance. Ladder Ladder Rungs Unsafe Ladder is unsafe due to missing rungs,Ladder meets design standards and misalignment,rust,cracks,or sharp edges,allows maintenance person safe access. Maintenance Defect or Problem Conditions When Maintenance is Needed Results Expected When Component Maintenance is performed Metal Grates (If Unsafe Grate Grate with opening wider than 7/8 inch.Grate opening meets design Applicable)Opening standards. Trash and Debris Trash and debris that is blocking more than 20%Grate free of trash and debris, of grate surface. Damaged or Missing.Grate missing or broken member(s)of the grate.Grate is in place and meets design standards. NO.10 -CONVEYANCE PIPES AND DITCHES Maintenance Defect or Problem Conditions When Maintenance is Needed Results Expected When Component Maintenance is Performed Pipes Sediment &Debds Accumulated sediment that exceeds 20%of the Pipe cleaned of all sediment and diameter of the pipe.debris. Vegetation Vegetation that reduces free movement ofwater All vegetation removed so water threugh pipes,flows freely through pipes. Damaged Pipe repaired or replaced. I I I I I I I I Protective coating is damaged;rust is causing more than 50%deterioration to any part of pipe. Pipe repaired or replaced.Any dent that decreases the cross section area of pipe by more than 20%. Open Ditches Trash &Debds Trash and debris exceeds 1 cubicfoot per 1,000 Trash and debris cleared from square feet of ditch and slopes,ditches. Sediment Accumulated sediment that exceeds 20%of thedesigndepth.Ditch cleaned/fleshed of all sediment and debris so that it matches design. Vegetation Vegetation that reduces free movement of water Water flows freely through ditches. through ditches. Erosion Damage to See "Detention Ponds"Table No.1 See "Detention Ponds"Table No.1 Slopes Rock Lining Out of Maintenance person can see native soil beneath Replace recks to design standards. Place or Missing (If the rock lining, Applicable). PACLAND Job #2005127.0]4.00 Page 14I Preliminary Storm Drainage Analysis Renton,WA I I I I I I I NO.11 -GROUNDS (LANDSCAPING) Maintenance Defect or Problem Conditions When Maintenance is Needed Results Expected When Component Maintenance is Performed General Weeds Weeds growthg in more than 20%of the Weeds present in less than 5%of (Nonpoisonous,not landscaped area (trees and shrubs only),the landscaped area. noxious) Safety Hazard Any presence of poison ivy or other poisonous No poisonous vegetation present in vegetation,landscaped area. Trash or Litter Paper,cans,bottles,totaling more than 1 cubic Area dear of litter. foot within a landscaped area (trees and shrubs only)of 1,000 square feet. Trees and Shrubs Damaged Limbs or parts of trees or shrubs that are split orbrokenwhichaffectmorethan25%of the total foliage of the tree or shrub. Trees and shrubs with less than 5% of total foliage with split or broken limbs. Trees or shrubs that have been blown down or Tree or shrub in place free of injury. knocked over. Trees or shrubs which are not adequately supported or are leaning over,causing exposure of the roots. Tree or shrub in place and adequeteiy supported;remove any dead or diseased trees. I I I I I II I I NO.21 -STORMFILTER®(CARTRIDGE TYPE) Maintenance Defect or Problem Condition When Maintenance is Needed Recommended Maintenance to Component Correct Problem Compost Media Plugged Drawdown of water through the media takes Replace media cartridges. longer than 1 hour.and/or overflow occurs frequently. Short Circuiting Flows do not propedy enter tilter cadddges.Replace tilter cartridges. Pipes Damaged Any part of the pipes that are crushed,damaged Pipe repaired and/or replaced. due to corrosion and/or settlement. Access Cover Damaged/Not Cover cannot be opened,one person cannot Cover repaired to properworking Working open the cover,corrosion/deformation of cover,specifications or replaced. Vault SthJcture Damage to Wall,[Cracks wider than ½inch and any evidence of soil Vault replaced or repaired to design Frame,Bottom,!particles entering the structure through the specifications. and/or Top Slab i cracks,or maintenance/inspection personneldeterminesthatthevaultisnotstructurally sound. Damaged Pipe Joints Cracks wider than ½inch at the joint of any No cracks more than '/,inch wide at inlet/outlet pipe or any evidence of soil particles the joint of the inlet/outlet pipe. eetedng the vault through the walls. Baffles Damaged Baffles corroding,cracking warping,and/or Repair or replace baffles to showing signs of failure as determined by specification. mainteeance/inspectJon person. Access Ladder Damaged Ladder is corroded or deteriorated,not Ladder replaced or repaired and funclJoniog propedy,missing rungs,cracks,and meets specifications,and is safe to misaligned,use as determined by inspection personnel. PACLAND lob #2005127.014.00 Page 15 I I Preliminary Storm Drainage Analysis Renton,WA I I I I I I I ! I I I I I I I II I I Covenants Dedications,and Easements This information shall be provided at the next submittal as coordinated with the City of Renton. PACLAN D Job #2005127.014.00 Page 16 Preliminary Storm Drainage Analysis Renton,WA I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I Appendix Technical Information Report (TIR)Worksheet ...................................................................18 Appendix A Figures...............................................................................................21 Figure A1 -ALTA/ACSM Land Title Survey o{the Property Figure A2 -Site Plan Figure A3 -Grading and Drainage Plan Figure A4 -King County GIS Map Figure A5 -SCS/USDA Soils Map Figure A6 -Basin Map Figure A7 -2-year,24-hour Isopluvial Figure A8 -1 O-year,24-hour Isopluvial Figure A9 -24-year,24-hour Isopluvial Appendix B Existing Site Hydrology Output Data\Calculations .............................30 Appendix C Developed Site Hydrology Output Data\Calculations ........................31 PACLAND Job #2005127.014.00 Page 17 I I Preliminary Storm Drainage Analysis Renton,WA I I I I I I King County Department of Development and Environmental Services TECHNICAL INFORMATION REPORT (TIR)WORKSHEET Part 1 PROJECT OWNER AND Part 2 .PROJECT LOCATION AND PROJECT-ENGINEER DESCRIPTION Project Owner Bob Boyd -Puqet Weste'm,Inc. Address c/o PACLAND,11235 SE 6th St,Suite 220,Bellevue,WA 98004"- Phone (425)487-6550 Project Engineer Steve Pesce Company_PACLAND Address/Phone (425}453-9501 Project Name Lowe's of Renton Location Township 23N Range 5E Section 8 I I I I Part 3 TYPE OF .PERMIT APPLICATION .... []Subdivison []Short Subdivision []Grading []Commercial Other Part 4 OTHER REVIEWS AND PERMITS []DFW HPA []COE 404 []DOE Dam Safety []FEMA Floodplain []COE Wetlands []Shoreline Management []Rockery []Structural Vaults []Other Part 5 SITE COMMUNI ANDDRAINAGE BASIN I I City of RentonCommunity Drainage Basin East Lake Washinqton -Renton Pall 6.SITE CHARACTERISTICS:__..I I I I []River []Stream []Critical Stream Reach []Depressions/Swales []Lake []Steep Slopes []Floodplain []Wetlands []Seeps/Springs []High Groundwater Table []Groundwater Recharge []Other Poor soils. I PACLAND Job #2005127.014.00 Page 18 Preliminary Storm Drainage Analysis Renton,WA I I I I Part7 SQIILS "":-.:-..:"....."•-" Soil Type Slopes Erosion Potential Urban 0.8 to 2%Hiqh Erosive Velocities Unknown []Additional Sheets Attached I I I I I Part 8 DEVELOPMENT LIMITATIONS , [] [] [] [] [] [] [] REFERENCE Ch.4 -Downstream Analysis Additional Sheets Attached LIMITATION/SITE CONSTRAINT None due to not exceedinq existinq peak I I I I I Part 9 ESC REQUIREMENTS ,.,. MINIMUM ESC REQUIREMENTS /vINIMUM ES-C REQUIREMENTS DURING CONSTRUCTION []Sedimentation Facilities []Stabilized Construction Entrance [Perimeter Runoff Control Clearing and Grading Restrictions []Cover Practices Construction Sequence Other AFTER CONSTRUCTION :Stabilize Exposed Surface [Remove and Restore Temporary ESC Facilities [Clean and Remove All Silt and Debris [Ensure Operation of Permanent Facilities [Flag Limits of SAO and open space preservation areas []Other PACLAND Job #2005127.014.00 Page 19 Preliminary Storm Drainage Analysis Renton,WA I I I I I I I I Part 10 SURFACE,WATER SYSTEM ".......,, []Grass Lined Channel []Pipe System []Open Channel []Dry Pond []Wet Pond []Tank []Infiltration []Vault []Depression []Energy []Flow Dispersal Dissipater []Waiver []Wetland []Regional []Stream Detention Method of Analysis Santa Barbara Compensation/Mitigati on of Eliminated Site Storage none Brief Description of System Operation Pipe conveyance to bioswale for treatment before disposal to public storm sewer. Facility Related Site Limitations Reference Facility Limitation I I I I I I I Part 11 STRUCTURAL ANALYSIS []Cast in Place Vault []Retaining Wall []Rockery >4'High []Structural on Steep Slope []Other Part i2 EASEMENTS/TRACTS []Drainage Easement []Access Easement []Native Growth Protection Easement []Tract []Other Utility Easements Part 13 SIGNATURE OF PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER I or a civil engineer under my supervision have visited the site.Actual site conditions as observed were incorporated into this worksheet and the attachments.To the best of my knowledge the information provided here is accurate. Signed/Date PACLAND Job #2005127.014.00 Page 20 I I I I I I I I I I I i I I I I Ii: Preliminary Storm Drainage Analysis Renton,WA Appendix A -Figures Figure A1 -ALTA/ACSM Land Title Survey of the Property PACLAND Job #2005127.014.00 Page 21 -_%,,..;.|............. VICINITY MAP ,T 1o SE NW 1/4 SECTION 8-23 5SC&LE :00 J PaO uo CA[5 "',81",=i i......I ",_\\\',,f i /"mrla/12/e5 ,/-...../1z/ae* ,l,..........."'c*c'c.'.'.,9".*s A I 0=$£CnO I'atom 8/IU05 AIL.TIA.CERTIFICATION: 0AE 10/)4/05 SCZ AS SHOtN PORON CF:NW I/(,NE I/4,SECTION 08,T.23 N,R 5 E,WM. ALTA/ACSM LAND TITLE SURVEY FOR PACLAND ® 0577010 li Ii I I I I I 60 NOTE:SPOT ELEVATIONS HAVE BE£N TURNED OFF FOR PURPOSESI0.CLARITY>TO VIEW INAW LYERS SN-,.-p I eh =It ALTA/ACSM LAND TITLE SURVEY FOR PACLAND 05770,10 05770.10 Preliminary Storm Drainage Analysis Renton,WA I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I Figure A2 -Site Plan PACLAND Job #2005127.014.00 Page 22 I I Preliminary Storm Drainage Analysis Renton,WA I I I i I I|Figure A3 -Grading and Drainage Plan PACLAND Job #2005127.014.00 Page 23 I I I I I I i l I I I I gLL 48 HOURS I "BEFORE YOU DIG I -800-424-5555 I WAER HOME CENTERS,INC. REVISIONS DAE I !DESCRIPTION ] I I r [ LEGEND I I i I I I I I I Preliminary Storm Drainage Analysis Renton,WA I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I Lake Washington Figure A4 -King County G|S Map PACLAND lob #2005127.014.00 Page 24 Preliminary Storm Drainage Analysis Renton,WA I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I Figure A5 -SCS/USDA Soils Map Key:Ur =Urban Land PACLAND Job #2005127.014.00 Page 25 Preliminary Storm Drainage Analysis Renton,WA Figure A6 -Basin Map PACLAND Job #2005127.014.00 Page 26 NISV{]70{7073I\3OVNIVI(]\/II]IHXI\SO/(I\N a"V uapJoo\SIO]\NOINII\V\:II i i zZ 112 m I I Preliminary Storm Drainage Analysis Renton,WA Figure A7 -2-year,24-hour Isopluvial I I I i I I I I I I I I I I I I WESTERN KING COUNTY 2-Year 24-Hour Precipitation in Inches N %-0 2 4 Miles PACLAND Job #2005127.014.00 Page 27 Preliminary Storm Drainage Analysis Renton,WA Figure A8 -10-year,24-hour Isopluvial I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I Proposed Retail Site WESTERN KING COUNTY 10oYear 24-Hour Precipitation in Inches PACLAND Job #2005127.014.00 Page 28 [i Preliminary Storm Drainage Analysis Renton,WA I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I Figure A9 -100-year,24-hour Isopluvial WESTERN KING COUNTY 100-Year 24-Hour Precipitation in Inches !PACLAND Job #2005127.014.00 Page 29 [I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I Preliminary Storm Drainage Analysis Appendix B -Exisring Site Hydrology Outpu t Data I Calculations Appended on:15:24:29 Wednesday,December 07,2005 EXISTING Event Summary Event Peak Q (cfs)[PeakT(hrs)Hyd Vol(acff)Area c)Method Raintype 2 year 4.3459 8.01 1.4480 9.7900 SCS TYPE1A 10 year 6.4406 8.01 2,1800 9,7900 SCS TYPE1A 25 year 7.8267 8.01 2.6692 9.7900 SCS TYPE1A 100 year 8.7479 8.01 2.9954 9.7900 SCS TYPE1A Renton,WA Record Id:EXISTING Design Method SCS Rainfall type TYPE1A !Hyd Inlv [l 0.00 min Peaking Factor 484.00 ]Abstraction Coeff 0.20 Pervious Area 0.00 ac DCIA 9.79 ac Pervious CN 0.00 DC CN 98.00 Pervious TC 0.00 rain DC TC 8.01 min I Directly Connected CN Calc [Description Asphalt SubArea Sub cn 9.79 ac 98.00 DC Composited CN (AMC 2)98.00 Directly Connected TC Calc •Type Description Sheet Smooth Surfaces.:0.011 Shallow Paved Channel (interm)Concrete pipe (n=0.012) Length I SIope Coeff [Misc 300.00 ft 11.50%I0.0110 12.00 in I117.oo ft I15OO/o Io.oloo 550.00 ft [0.41%o.ot2o TT 4.14 min 0.50 rain 3.37 min Directly Connected TC 8.30min Licensed to:Professional License PACLAND Job #2005127.014.00 Page 30 Preliminary Storm Drainage Analysis Renton,WA Appendix C -Develo ed Site Hydrology Output DatalCalculationsI I I I POST-ROOF Event Summary I.Event tPeak Q (cfs)'Peak T (hrs)IHyd Vol (acfl)[Area (ac)IMethod jRaintype I2Year I 1.3116 8.00 I 0.4354 [2.9500[SCS ITYPEIA J 10year I 1.9424 800 I 0.6565 129500 i scs ITYPEIA 125 Year 1 2.3599 8.00 I 0.8038 [2.9500 I scs ITYPEIA 1100ye d 2.6374 8.00 I 0.9022 [295001SCS ITYPEIA Record Id:POST-ROOF Design Method SCS Rainfall type TYPE 1A Hyd Intv 10.00 min Peaking Factor 484.00 Abstraction Coeff 0.20 Pervious Area 0.00 ac DCIA 2.95 ac Pervious CN 0.00 DC CN 98.00 I I I I I I I Pervious TC 0.00 min DC TC 5.27 min Directly Connected CN Calc Description •Impervious surfaces (pavements,roofs,etc) SubArea Sub cn 2.95 ac 98.00 DC Composited CN (AMC 2)98.00 Directly Connected TC Calc Type Description Length Slope Coeff Misc TT Sheet Smooth Surfaces.:0.011 300.00 ft 1.00%0.0110 2.00 in 4.87 min Shallow Paved 177.00 ft 1.00%[0.0100 0.40 min Directly Connected TC 5.50rain I I I I PACLAN D Job #200_5127.014.00 Page 31 I I Preliminary Storm Drainage Analysis POST-N Event Summary Event Peak Q (cfs)Peak T (hrs)Hyd Vol (acft)Area (ac)Method Raintype 2 year 0.6478 8.00 0.1690 1.5200 SCS TYPE1A 10 year 0.9734 8.00 0.2757 1.5200 SCS TYPE1A 25 year 1.1896 8.00 0.3471 1.5200 SCS TYPE1A Renton,WA I I I 100 year 1.3334 8.00 0.3890 1.5200 SCS TYPE1A Record Id:POST-N Design Method SCS Rainfall type TYPE 1A Hyd Intv 10.00 min Peaking Factor 484.00 I I I I I I I I I I I I I Pervious Area 0.21 ac Pervious CN 92.00 Abstraction Coeff 0.20 DCIA 1.31 ac DC CN 98.00 Pervious TC 9.96 rain DC TC 0.50 rain Pervious CN Calc Description SubArea Sub cn LandscaP!ng 0.21 ac I 92.00 Pervious Composited CN (AMC 2)92.00 Pervious TC Calc Type Description Length l Slope l Coeff [Misc I1.50%[0.2400 2.00 in 8.34 min 34.00 ff 12.00%[0.0100 E).12 min 381.00 ft [1.00%3.0120 .50 min ![Sheet Dense grasses :0.24 33.00 ft IShal!ow Paved [Channel (interm)Corcrete pipe (n =0.012) I Pervious TC 10.03 rain I Directly Connected CN Calc [Desc,'iPlion SubArea Sub cn I Commercial &Business 1.31 ac 98.00 I DC Composited CN (AMC 2)98.00 I Directly Connected TC Ca!c Type Description Length Slope Coeff Misc TT Sheet Smooth Surfaces.:0.011 10.00 ft 2.00%0.0110 2.00 in 0.24 min Shallow Paved 150.00 ft 1.00%0.0100 0.26 min Directly Connected TC 0.65min PACLAN D Job #2005127.014.00 Page 32 I I Preliminary Storm Drainage Analysis POST-S Event Summary Renton,WA I I I Event Peak Q (cfs)Peak T (hrs) 2 year 2.3162 8.00 Hyd Vol (acfl)Area (ac)Method Raintype 0.7701 5.3200 SCS TYPE1A 10 year 3.4556 8.00 1.1663 5.3200 SCS TYPE1A 25 year 4.2107 8.00 1.4311 5.3200 SCS TYPE1A :l 100 year 4.7126 8.00 1.6085 5.3200 SCS TYPE 1A I I I I I I I I I I I I I Design Method Hyd Intv Record Id:POST-S SCS Rainfall type TYPE 1A 10.00 min Peaking Factor 484.00 Abstraction Coeff 0.20 Pervious Area 0.35 ac DCIA Pervious CN 92.00 DC CN Pervious TC 6.98 min DC TC 4.97 ac 98.00 6.09 min Pervious CN Calc rDes_cripti°n i SubArea Sub cn Landscaping 0.35 ac 92.00 Pervious Composited CN (AMC 2)92.00 Pervious TC Calc Type Description Misc I TT Dense grasses :0.24 12.00 in [2.41 minSheet Length I SIope I Coeff 7.00 ft [1.50%10.2400 Shallow Paved 139.00 ft 12.00%[0.0100 0.51 rain Channel (interm)Concrete pipe (n0.012 1034.00 ft t1.00%10.0120 4.06 min [I Pervious TC 7.28 min I Directly Connected CN Calc I Description SubArea Sub cn t Commercial &Business 4.97 ac 98.00 t DC Composited CN (AMC 2)98.00 [Type ISheet [Channel (interm) Directly Connected TC Calc Description Length I SIope I Coeff [Misc [TT Smooth Surfaces.:0.011 139.00 ft [2.00%10.011012.00 in [1.99 rain Concrete pipe (n=0.012 1043.00 ft 11.00%[0.0120 I [4.09 rain [Directly Connected TC 6.09min PACLAN D Job #2005127.014.00 Page 33 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I Phase I Environmental Site Assessment and Groundwater Sampling Proposed Lowe's Renton Site Renton,Washington File No.8335-003-01 March 6,2006 Prepared for: Lowe's HIW Inc. c/o PacLand 11235 SE 6th Street,Suite 220 Bellevue,Washington 98004 Attention:Paul Manzer Prepared by: GeoEngineers,Inc. Plaza 600 Building 600 Stewart Street,Suite 1700 Seattle,Washington 98101 (206)728-2674 GeoEngineers,Inc. Prajakta Ghatpande Environmental Engineer David A.Cook,LG Associate PG:DAC:jm SEAT:\8\8335003\01Finals\83350030 IR.doc Copyright©2006 by GeoEngineers,Inc.All rights reserved. Disclaimer:Any electronic form,facsimile or had copy of the original document (emall,text,table,and/or figure),if provided,and any attachments are only a copy of the original document.The original document is stored by GeoEngineers,Ine and will serve as the official document of record. File No.8335 003-01 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I TABLE OF CONTENTS Pge No. 1.0 INTRODUCTION ....................................................................................................................................1 2.0 PURPOSE AND SCOPE OF SERVICES ..............................................................................................1 2.1 PHASE I ESA ...............................................................................................................................1 2.2.1 Additional Scope Elements ..............................................................................................2 2.2 GROUNDWATER SAMPLING .....................................................................................................3 2.3 SPECIAL CONSIDERATIONS .....................................................................................................3 3.0 SITE DESCRIPTION ..............................................................................................................................3 3.1 INVOLVED PARTIES ...................................................................................................................3 3.2 LOCATION,LEGAL DESCRIPTION AND SETTING ...................................................................3 3.3 SITE RECONNAISSANCE ...........................................................................................................4 3.3.1 Summary of Observations ...............................................................................................4 3.3.2 Findings............................................................................................................................6 3.4 ADJACENT PROPERTY AND VICINITY OBSERVATIONS .......................................................6 3.4.1 Summary of Observations ...............................................................................................6 3.4.2 Findings............................................................................................................................6 3.5 PREVIOUS REPORTS .................................................................................................................6 3.5:1 Summary of Previous Reports .........................................................................................6 3.5.2 Findings............................................................................................................................9 4.0 ENVIRONMENTAL RECORDS REVIEW ..............................................................................................9 4.1 DATABASE SEARCH ...................................................................................................................9 4.2 REVIEW OF REGULATORY FILES ...........................................................................................10 4.2.1 Boeing Renton Plant .......................................................................................................10 4.2.2 PACCAR .........................................................................................................................11 4.3 FINDINGS...................................................................................................................................11 5.0 SITE HISTORY .....................................................................................................................................11 5.1 HISTORICAL RESOURCES ......................................................................................................11 5.2 HISTORICAL SITE OWNERSHIP AND USE SUMMARY .........................................................13 5.3 ADJACENT AND NEARBY PROPERTIES ................................................................................13 5.4 ENVIRONMENTAL LIENS OR PROPERTY USE RESTRICTIONS .........................................14 5.5 FINDINGS ...................................................................................................................................14 6.0 ADDITIONAL SERVICES .....................................................................................................................14 6.1 FEDERAL EMERGENCY FLOOD PLAIN MAPS REVIEW .......................................................14 6.2 WATER SUPPLY WELL DATABASE SEARCH ........................................................................14 6.3 ENDANGERED OR PROTECTED FLORA AND FAUNA REVIEW ..........................................14 6.4 HISTORIC STRUCTURES,ARCHEOLOGICAL AND CULTURAL RESOURCES REVIEW....15 6.5 SURFACE WATER EVALUATION AND WETLANDS DETERMINATION ................................15 6.6 GROUNDWATER SAMPLING ...................................................................................................15 6.6.1 General ..........................................................................................................................15 6.2.2 Groundwater ..................................................................................................................16 7.0 CONCLUSIONS ..............................................................................................................i ....................17 7.1 PHASE I ESA AND GROUNDWATER SAMPLING CONCLUSIONS .......................................17 8.0 LIMITATIONS .......................................................................................................................................17 GEOENGINEERSFileNo.8335-003-01 Page iMarch6,2006 I I I I I I I I I ! I I I I I I I I TABLE OF CONTENTS (CONTINUED) Paqe No. List of Tables (Within Report Text) Table I.Site Information ...............................................................................................................................4 Table I1.Summary of Site Reconnaissance Observations ...........................................................................5 Table III.Adjoining Streets and Adjacent Properties Observations .............................................................6 Table IV.Summary of Regulatory Database Search Listing of Potential Environmental Concern ............10 TableV.Historical Resources Reviewed ...................................................................................................12 List of Tables Table 1.Summary of Water Level Data Table 2.Summary ofGoundwater ChemicalAnalytical Data-HCID,HVOCs and RCRA Metals List of Figures Figure 1.Vicinity Map Figure 2.Site Plan Figures 3 through 6.Site Photographs -December 2005 APPENDICES APPENDIX A -AGREEMENTS APPENDIX B -ENVIRONMENTAL DATA RESOURCES (EDR)REPORT APPENDIX C -SELECTED HISTORICAL RESEARCH DOCUMENTS APPENDIX D -ZONING MAP APPENDIX E -FEMA FLOOD MAP APPENDIX F-WELL LOG SEARCH APPENDIX G -WETLANDS DETERMINATION LETTER APPENDIX H -FIELD EXPLORATIONS..................................................................................................H-1 Appendix H Figures Figure H-1.Key to Exploration Logs Figures H-5,H-6 and H-8.Log of Borings APPENDIX I -CHEMICAL ANALYTICAL PROGRAM ..............................................................................I-1 APPENDIX J -REPORT LIMITATIONS AND GUIDELINES FOR USE ..........................................J-1 ...J-3 GEOENGINEERSFileNo.8335-003-0l Page ii March 6,2006 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I PHASE I ENVIRONMENTAL SITE ASSESSMENT AND GROUNDWATER SAMPLING PROPOSED LOWE'S RENTON SITE RENTON,WASHINGTON FOR LOWE'S HIW INC. 1.0 INTRODUCTION This report summarizes the results of our Phase I Environmental Site Assessment (ESA)and Groundwater Sampling of the proposed 9.79-acre site located at the southeast corner ofthe intersection of North Park Drive and Garden Avenue North in Renton,Washington.The property is referred to herein as the "Site."The Site is shown relative to surrounding physical features in Figure 1.The Site layout and surrounding properties are shown in Figure 2.Photographs of the Site are shown in Figures 3 through 6. GeoEngineers also is providing geotechnical services for the Site.The results of our geotechnical study are reported separately. Our study was completed at the request of Paul Manzer of PacLand (Lowe's development consultant). We understand that Lowe's H/W Inc.is considering purchase and redevelopment of this property,which is currently used as a parking lot that is located north of Fry's Electronics Retail Store and west of the BNSF mainline railroad tracks. We understand that the proposed Lowe's site was part of the 400 acre Boeing Renton airplane complex. We understand that the Site is currently a vacant parking lot.We also understand that the proposed Lowe's development consists of a 157,953 square foot development (128,277 square foot building and 29,676 square foot garden area).We understand that the southern portion of the Site will consist of at- grade parking.We further understand that the results of this Phase I ESA will be used as part of Lowe's evaluation of potential environmental liabilities associated with site ownership and redevelopment. 2.0 PURPOSE AND SCOPE OF SERVICES 2.1 PHASE I ESA The purpose of this Phase I ESA is to identify recognized environmental conditions1 (RECs)in connection with the property.GeoEngineers'scope of services was completed in general accordance with American Society for Testing and Materials (ASTM)Standard E 1527-00 for Phase I ESAs. GeoEngineers'qualifications for performing Phase I ESAs are contained in our proposal included in Appendix A.Our standard Phase I ESA scope of services was modified to address the additional requested scope outlined in the attached "Lowe's Development Criteria,Section 700"document dated August 1,2003.The additional elements are identified in the "Additional Scope"section below:Our scope of services for the Phase I ESA is as follows: 1.Reviewed readily available geotechnical reports,environmental reports and/or other relevant documents pertaining to environmental conditions at the subject site. 1 Recognized Environmental Conditions are defined in ASTM E 1527-00 as "the presence or likely presence of any hazardous substances or petroleum products on a property under conditions that indicate an existing release,a past release,or a material threat of a release of any hazardous substances or petroleum products into structures on the property or into the ground, groundwater or surface water of the property.The term includes hazardous substances or petroleum products even under conditions in compliance with laws.The term is not intended to include de minimis conditions that generally do not present a material risk of harm to public health or the environment and that generally would not be the subjeci of an enforcement action if brought to the attention of appropriate governmental agencies." GEOENGINEERSFileNo.8335-003o01 Page 1 March 6,2006 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I 2.Reviewed the results of a federal,state and local environmental database search provided by an outside environmental data service for listings of known or suspected environmental problems at the site or nearby properties within the search distances specified by ASTM.We attempted to identify unidentified (orphan)sites where possible.Section 700 requested an increase to the search distance of 0.25 miles from the site boundary for every 20 acre increase above a 20 acre site.This addition was not applicable for this site since it is about 9 acres in size. 3.Reviewed regulatory agency files regarding listed sites of potential environmental concern relative to the subject Site. 4.Identified a key site manager with specific knowledge of past and present site use and requested that he or she meet a GeoEngineers'representative on site for an interview during the visual site reconnaissance.We interviewed the key site manager by phone. 5.Interviewed a representative of the local fire department,health department,and/or Ecology regarding the history of the subject site and surrounding properties relative to the likely presence ofhazardous substances. 6.Reviewed historical aerial photographs,fire insurance maps,city directories,chain-of-title reports and tax assessor records,as available and appropriate,to identify past development history on and adjacent to the site relative to the possible use,generation,storage,release or disposal of hazardous substances.Attempted to identify uses of the site from the present to the time that records show no apparent development ofthe site. 7.Reviewed current USGS topographic maps to identify the physiographic setting of the site. 8.Identified the source(s)of potable water for the site and current heating and sewage disposal system(s)used at the site,if any,and their age,if readily available. 9.Provided a statement on the local geologic,soil and groundwater conditions based on our general experience and sources such as geologic maps and soil surveys. 10.Conducted a visual reconnaissance of the site and adjacent properties to identify visible evidence ofRECs.Our recoo will include an evaluation of PCB containing electrical equipment,if any. 11.Provided a written summary of the Phase I ESA results and identified RECs along with our opinion regarding the potential for contamination at the site. 2.2.1 Additional Scope Elements The following additional scope elements are based on our review of Lowe's "Section 700 Environmental Requirements".These elements are in addition to the ASTM standard scope outlined above. 1.Reviewed Federal Emergency Management Agency flood plain maps to evaluate the 100-year flood plain status. 2.Included a water supply well database search. 3.Completed (1)an endangered species or protected flora/fauna evaluation,(2)historic structures/archeological and cultural resources review and (3)surface water evaluation using existing and available databases and/or by interviews as outlined in Sections 1.4.2,1.4.3 and 1.4.4 of Section 700. 4.Wetlands determination.Completed a wetlands evaluation of the site as outlined in Subsection 2.6 of Section 700.A wetlands delineation was not needed based on the evaluation results. GEOENGINEERSFi&No,8335-003-01 Page 2 March 6,2006 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I 2.2 GROUNDWATER SAMPLING Groundwater sampling was performed to evaluate the potential for groundwater impacts beneath the subject site.The scope ofthis work is as follows: 1.Surveyed the top of casing elevations for the three existing groundwater monitoring wells that were installed during our geotechnieal engineering exploration program. 2.Monitored the depth to groundwater and collected groundwater samples from each of the three monitoring wells. 3.Submitted one groundwater sample from each well to a chemical analytical laboratory for analysis of petroleum hydrocarbons by Ecology Method NWTPH-HCID,halogenated volatile organic compounds (HVOCs)by EPA Method 8260B,and RCRA Metals by EPA Method 6000/7000 series. 4.Analyzed the data and incorporated the findings in the Phase I ESA report. 2.3 SPECIAL CONSIDERATIONS Because no buildings are currently located at the Site,our scope of services does not include an environmental compliance audit,an evaluation for the presence of lead-based paint,toxic mold, polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs)in-light ballasts,radon,lead in drinking water,asbestos-containing building materials or urea-formaldehyde insulation in on-site structures.Soil,surface water sampling and chemical analysis are not included as part of this scope of services.If requested,we can provide additional information regarding these services. 3.0 SITE DESCRIPTION 3.1 INVOLVED PARTIES The Site currently is owned by Dash 80 LP.Lowe's HIW Inc.is considering purchasing the property. The Site currently contains a vacant at-grade parking lot formerly owned and occupied by The Boeing Company. 3.2 LOCATION,LEGAL DESCRIPTION AND SETTING General site information,property use(s)and environmental setting of the site area are summarized in Table I below.Refer to Figure l for a vicinity map and Figure 2 for the layout of the site in relation to surrounding properties. GEOENGINEERSFi&No.8335-003-01 Page 3 March 6,2006 I I Table I.Site Information I I I I I I I I I Topographic Map U.S.Geological Survey,7.5 minute of Renton,Washington topographic quadrangle map revised 1994 Quarter,Section,Township NW quarter of Section 8,Township 23 North,Range 5 East,Willamette Meridian and Range Site Address 800 Garden Avenue North Site General Location Legal Description Site Approximate Area Site Existing Use Geologic Setting Nearest Surface Water Bodies Approximate Surface Elevation Soil and Geologic Conditions Depth to Groundwater Inferred Direction of Shallow Groundwater Flow Southeast corner of the intersection of North Park Drive and Garden Avenue North in Renton,Washington,north of Fry's Electronics Retail Store 082305 217 portion of NW 1/4 &NE 1/4 begin intersection of s line of nw 1/4 with ELY margin of Garden Street th s 89-28-08 e 638.89 ft to point on WLY margin of pacific ceasl RR CP PJW,said point being upon a curve to right radius of 810.39 fl from which th center ol circle bears n 52-20-26 e th along said margin curving to right arc length of 277.71 ft to poinl of tangency th n 1801-31 W 1993.78 ft to intersection with sly margin of psh-1 North Renton interchange a-line dw th S 49-10-34 w 406.07 ft th s 31-54-35 w 72.66 ft to point on ELY margin of garden street th S 17-59-39 e 1329.46 ft to point of curve to right radius of 910 fl along said margin curving to right arc length of 294,22 ff to point of tangency th s 00-31-51 '. 253.23 ft to point of beginning less portion of primary state highway no 1 (SR 405)North Renton interchange (parking lot 6) 9.79 acres Vacant parking lot Puget Sound lowland Lake Washington is located approximately 1,700 feet northwest of the Site.The Cedar Rivet is located approximately 3,400 feet west of the Site,where it discharges to Lake Washington. Elevation 30 feet (northwest comer)to Elevation 40 (southwest comer) Approximately 4 to 12 feet of silty sand with gravel fill generally overlying alluvium censistin of inter-bedded layers of sand,silt,and peat,based on our subsurface explorations at the Site. Approximately 7 to 9 feet below ground surface based on our static groundwater leve measurements obtained from the site monitoring wells on January 3,2006 Generally towards the west to northwest,based on groundwater level measurement: obtained on January 3,2006 and the location of the Cedar River and Lake Washington. I I I I I I I Our knowledge of the general physiographic setting,geology and groundwater occurrence in the site vicinity is based on our review of the maps listed above,previous site reports,our surface explorations at the Site,and our general experience in the area. 3.3 SITE RECONNAISSANCE 3.3.1 Summary of Observations A representative of GeoEngineers performed a visual reconnaissance of the Site on December 23,2005. The GeoEngineers representative was unaccompanied during the site reconnaissance.Mr.Ray Powers of Boeing's Environmental Affairs department was identified as a "key site manager"with historical knowledge of the Site use.Our interviews with Mr.Powers took place by phone and are summarized in Section 5.0. The Site was accessed from a gate located along Garden Avenue North (west of the Site).The property currently consists of an approximately 9.79-acre vacant parking lot.The Site was paved with asphaltic concrete pavement and contained light posts at various locations around the parking lot at the time of our site visit.A fence surrounds the Site and adjacent Fry's Electronics Retail Store property to the south. GEOENGINEERSFileNo.8335-003-01 Page 4March6,2006 I I I I Table II below summarizes conditions observed during our site reconnaissance.Section 3.3.2 contains additional details regarding conditions of potential environmental significance,if any,observed during our site reconnaissance and a summary list of known or suspect environmental conditions identified by this portion of our study.The approximate locations of the observed features discussed in this section are shown in Figure 2.Photographs of the Site were taken to document observations made during our reconnaissance.Selected site photographs are presented in Figures 3 through 7. Table II.Summary of Site Reconnaissance Observations I I I I I I I I I I I i I % ':=Feature tructures (existing) ;tructures (evidence of former) eating/Cooling System --Ioor Drains,Sumps or Do/wells kboveground Storage Tanks (ASTs) )nderground Storage Tanks (USTs)or--vidence of USTs )rums or Other Containers .hemicals or Hazardous Materials (other than te minimis quantities of cleaning products) --vidence of Leaks,Spills or Releases ;urrounding ASTs,USTs,and/or Chemical torage Areas ;tained or Corroded Floors,Walls or Drains other than apparent water stains or minor oil tains on pavement from parked vehicles) "Comment,L.otion and/Or DscriPti:ar.d bihe i V..•I;"de,'elbprnent onsite (e:g,pavemerit etc.);i;;;::,,res I No ;•: X Asphalt concrete pavement,and light posts X X X X X X X Six 55<Jallon unlabelled were located at the southern side of the Site, X X X ipes of Unknown Origin or Use 9n-site Septic System ewage Disposat System X Municipal =otable Water Supply X Municipal olid Waste Refuse Dumpsters X ydraulic Hoists X 3iWVater Separators X )iscolored or Stained Soil or Vegetation otentiaUy from Hazardous Substances X lazardous Waste Disposal Areas X Jncontained Debris,Refuse or UnidentifiedNasteMaterials X tanding Water or Other Liquids X .atch Basins and Storm Water Drainage its/Ponds/Lagoons X Naste or Wastewater Discharges X Jnusual Odors X .3tressed Vegetation X :ill Material Nater Wells (agricultural,domestic,monitoring)X ad-Mounted Transformers X Jole-Mounted Transformers X mm3therConditionsofEnvironmentalConcernX X Storm drains were observed in the parking area Fill material was encountered in our subsurface explorations a X described in Section 6.6.1 One pole mounted transformer was located at the southwes corner of the Site. I GEOENGINEERSFileNo.8335-003-01 Page 5March6,2006 I I I I I I I I I I I 3.3.2 Findings Known or suspect environmental conditions were not identified by this portion of the study. 3.4 ADJACENT PROPERTY AND VICINITY OBSERVATIONS 3.4.1 Summary of Observations We viewed properties located adjacent to and surrounding the Site on December 23,2005 from accessible public rights-of-way and the Site.We did not enter adjacent properties or buildings,but;conducted an automobile site reconnaissance of the properties surrounding the subject Site.The Site generally is situated in an area that is developed with industrial and commercial uses.Table III below outlines adjacent land uses and pertinent observations with respect to conditions that could pose a REC on the subject Site.Figure 2 shows adjacent property uses and locations in relation to the Site. Table IlL Adjoining Streets and Adjacent Properties Observations •:'Pbsii'0nRelative I=::i :i . DireCti0h :Adj0ifiing Street it0 site2 Adjacent Propertyanduse i:;Commen i :; North Park Ddve crossgradientNorth South None None Up/crossgradient Up/crossgradient North Park Drive None Fry's Electronics Retail Store with parking lot,Commercial Railroad,CommercialEast None Warehouses and offices of Keeler Supply Co.(Wholesale Pumbing &Supply)and Layfield Group (Geomembranes Supply) were located east of the railroad. Former location of Boeing's 10- 70s building complex West Garden Avenue Down/crossgradient Vacant Lot (Planned residential Former location of Boeing's 10- North development)60s building complex I I I I I I I 3.4.2 Findings Known or suspect environmental conditions were not identified by this portion of the study.The Boeing 10-60s and 10-70s building complexes formerly located on adjacent property to the west and east of the Site are discussed in subsequent sections of this report. 3.5 PREVIOUS REPORTS 3.5.1 Summary of Previous Reports GeoEngineers reviewed the following previous reports for portions of the former Boeing Renton Plant that included the subject Site.The areas of study in these reports included the Site and adjacent property to the east (former Boeing 10-70s buildings),and west (former Boeing 10-60s and 10-50s buildings). There were no environmental reports that solely addressed the 9.79-acre subject Site (A map showing the Boeing Renton plant and surrounding manufacturing facilities is included in Appendix C). 2 The inferred shallow groundwater flow direction inthe site vicinity is to toward the northwest as described in Section 3.2. GEOENGINEER$File No.8335 003-01 Page 6 March 6,2006 I I I I I I I I I I I I I i i I I i 1."Phase I Environmental Site Assessment,Boeing Renton Facility -Northeast Comer,"dated July 20,1999,prepared for The Boeing Company by AGI Technologies.This report encompasses the area bounded by NE Park Drive,Houser Way North,North 8th Street,and Park Avenue North. The subject Site is included as part of this study. 2."Phase I Environmental Site Assessment,the Boeing Renton Facility,"December 2004,prepared for Transwestem Investment Company by Environ International Corporation.This report encompasses the area to the west of the subject Site bounded by NE Park Drive,Garden Avenue North,North 8th Street,and Logan Avenue North. 3."Boeing Renton Facility -Parcel 1 (10-50s Complex and Lot 3)Phase II Environmental Site Assessment Report,"dated March 2005,prepared for The Boeing Company by Golder Associates Inc.This report encompasses the area to the west of the subject Site bounded by NE Park Drive, Garden Avenue North,North 8th Street,and Logan Avenue North. 4.[Draft]"Preliminary Geotechnical Engineering Services,Lakeshore Landing Property,"dated October 14,2005,prepared for FF Development LP by GeoEngineers.This report encompasses the area to the immediate west of the subject site across Garden Avenue,the north half of the property bounded by NE Park Drive,Garden Avenue North,North 8th Street,and Park Avenue North. 5."Phase I and 11 Environmental Site Assessment,Lakeshore Landing Residential Site"dated December 6,2005,prepared for FF Development LP by GeoEngineers.This report encompasses the area to the immediate west of the subject site across Garden Avenue,the north half of the property bounded by NE Park Drive,Garden Avenue North,North 8th Street,and Park Avenue North. 6."Geotechnical Engineering Services,Lowe's of Renton Site,"dated January 26,2006,prepared for Lowe's HIW Inc.by GeoEngineers.This report encompasses the subject site. GeoEngineers reviewed several environmental and geotechnical reports/documents pertaining to adjacent properties that formerly were part of the Boeing Renton Plant as part of a "Phase I and H Environmental Site Assessment"for FF Development for an 8-acre property to the west of the subject Site (Former Boeing 10-60s buildings).This property is included in a larger development known as the Transwestern- Harvest mixed use development which encompasses about 50 acres between the subject Site and the remaining Boeing Plant facilities to the west.GeoEngineers'Phase I and II ESA and geotechnical engineering study of the 8-acre residential portion of the Transwestem-Harvest redevelopment is located immediately west of the subject Site across Garden Avenue.We utilized the knowledge gained during our 2005 Phase I and II Environmental Site Assessment for the adjacent site in completing the ESA for the proposed Lowe's site.Our report and supporting area-wide documents are stored in GeoEngineers project file.No other environmental or geotechnical reports pertaining to the subject Site were provided. A summary of the contents of the reports/documents we reviewed for the subject Site and adjacent properties follows below: Subject Site •The subject Site and existing Fry's Electronics and Retail property was referred to as "Parking Lot 6"by Boeing and was essentially used for vehicle parking based on the July 20,1999 Phase I ESA that we reviewed.The southeast portion of parking lot 6 (current Fry's electronics and retail property)was used for contractor staging,equipment fueling,Boeing tool storage and soil and construction material stockpiling.Based on the 1999 AG1 Phase 1 ESA report,soil suspected to contain minimal concentrations of petroleum hydrocarbons (less than Washington State Model Toxics Control Act {MTCA}cleanup levels)was temporarily staged in this area for testing prior to off-site transport.Based on the AGI Phase I ESA report,the stockpile area was surrounded by GEOENGINEERSFileNo.8335-003-01 Page 7 March 6,2006 I I I I I i I I I I I I I I I I I I an asphalt berm and straw bales to serve as surface and stormwater controls.No conditions of environmental concern were reported relative to the subject Site based on our review of the 1999 Phase I ESA. Adjacent/Nearby Properties to the South •Boeing.Contaminants detected on adjacent former Boeing property to the south generally included petroleum hydrocarbons in soil,but not at concentrations of regulatory concern,and metals and VOCs (including vinyl chloride)in groundwater at concentrations of regulatory Concern. •PACCAR.The PACCAR.truck plant (former Superfund site)is located about 1,000 feet south of the subject Site.The PACCAR site does not appear to have impacted the subject Site. Information is presented in section 4.2. Adjacent Properties to the East Former Boeing 10-70s buildings (Immediately east of subject site across railroad tracks) •Historically the 10-70s buildings usage included manufacturing of water skis,machine shop activities,sheet metal fabrication and a chemical storage shed based on our review of the 1999 Phase I ESA for the site area.The chemicals bandied and stored include fiberglass resin, polyurethane,methyl ethyl ketone,and methylene chloride including handling and storage of various chemicals.De minimus quantities of soil were removed and tank removal activities were performed.Two spills were reported in 1988,one of which included a spill of 5,000 gallons of latex product onto asphalt and immediate cleanup following the spill.No significant soil or groundwater impacts were reported relative to the 10-70s buildings based on the AGI Phase I ESA report. Adjacent Properties to the West Former Boeing 10-60s buildings (Immediately west of subject site across Garden Avenue North) •This property was formerly owned and used by Boeing for commercial airplane research and development activities from the 1960s to 1990s.Building uses included a model shop,aircraft mockup areas and offices.Equipment/facilities used in the 10-60s complex included an aqueous degreaser and associated sump,wood and metal working shop,an equipment calibration laboratory,plastic injection molding area,dry filter paint booth,chiller area,and a preparation and wash-off area used to clean plaster molds and to collect rinsate from steam cleaning of small metal parts.The wash-related water was discharged to the sanitary sewer.No USTs or ASTs were identified at this site. •Documented spills.Spills of hazardous materials were documented associated with the former 10-60s complex including epoxy hardener and solutions of mercury,Freon and Pentachlorophenol (PCP). •Soil contamination.Arsenic was detected in imported fill soil at concentrations that exceed MTCA Method A cleanup levels during GeoEngineers recent Phase I and Phase II Environmental Site Assessment completed in December 2005.The source(s)of the fill is not known. •Groundwater contamination.Vinyl chloride,pentachlorophenol and total metals were detected in groundwater at concentrations that exceed MTCA Method A cleanup levels based on GeoEngineers'recent Phase I and Phase 1I Environmental Site Assessment completed in December 2005. GEOENGINEERSFileNo.8335-003-01 Page 8 March 6,2006 I I I ! I I I I I i I I I I i I I I Former Boeing 10-50s buildings (2 blocks west of subject site) •RECs identified at the former 10-50s buildings included 25 former petroleum,solvent and wastewater USTs and ASTs (and associated petroleum-contaminated soil),below-ground sumps for secondary containment of hazardous materials and conveyance/containment of wastewater, stormwater and process water,PCBs detected in soil (not at concentrations of regulatory concern) associated with two former electrical substations,and staining identified in a pedestrian tunnel (all associated with the former 10-50s complex on property two blocks to the west).The remaining USTs (and associated contamination)and sumps reportedly were removed during the recent demolition of 10-50s complex. •The 10-100 building (currently occupied by The Boeing Store)north of the Lake Washington Boulevard North and Park Avenue North intersection (Approximately one block northwest of the subject Site)was formerly used as an engine test facility and utilized a jet fuel UST.Petroleum hydrocarbons and VOCs were detected in soil,and VOCs were detected in groundwater,but not at concentrations of regulatory concern.Various metals were detected in groundwater at concentrations of regulatory concern in the former UST location. 3.5.2 Findings Known or suspect environmental conditions were not identified specific to the subject Site.Known or suspect environmental conditions identified in the vicinity ofthe subject Site include: •Area-wide groundwater contamination.Groundwater contamination,generally consisting of VOCs (including vinyl chloride)and metals from unknown source(s)has been detected in groundwater on adjacent properties,including immediately west of the subject Site. •The adjacent site vicinity has a 40 year history of industrial use associated with Boeing's commercial airplane research,development and manufacturing activities. •Hazardous materials historically were stored and used in the former 10-60s complex (immediately west of the subject site)including solvents,paints,oils,lubricants,antifreeze,freon and inks. •Fill material containing elevated arsenic concentrations was identified on the former 10-60s complex (immediately west of the Site);the source of which is unknown. 4.0 ENVIRONMENTAL RECORDS REVIEW 4.1 DATABASE SEARCH GeoEngineers reviewed the results of a search of pertinent environmental regulatory lists and databases for current or previous facilities listed at addresses located within ASTM-specified distances from the subject Site.The information reviewed was provided by a subcontracted regulatory list search service, Environmental Data Resources (EDR).The EDR report is presented in Appendix B.The report includes details regarding the listed facilities identified and maps showing the approximate locations of the listed facilities relative to the site. GeoEngineers reviewed the search results for listings pertaining to the subject Site.GeoEngineers also reviewed EDR's listing of database entries that could not be mapped by EDR because of insufficient addresses (orphans).Off-site facilities found within the specified distances from the Site were evaluated for potential impact to the Site. GEOENGINEERSFileNo.8335-003-01 Page 9 March 6,2006 I I I I I The Site itself was not listed in the EDR report,however the Boeing Renton Plant,which formerly included the subject Site,was listed.Table IV below summarizes the listed facilities that,in our opinion, could pose a REC to the subject Site.The remaining listed facilities identified in Appendix B either are located a significant distance from the Site,are in an inferred down-or cross-gradient position relative to the Site,or are included on the RCRA and/or UST lists only and are unlikely to pose a potential environmental concern to the Site,in our opinion.Inclusion on the RCRA and/or UST list does not necessarily indicate the facility is a known or suspected contaminated site.Regulatory database acronyms are defined in the EDR report. Table IV.Summary of Regulatory Database Search Listings of Potential Environmental Concern i I I I I I I I I I I I I i!==:7:1 t2std I :Listed l;::i:i:=======================iLoaton BusnSs:`Address,..:;:ReguatoDabas ::i.::.Oesedpti°nl i: ~400-acre area which includes subject site -1,000 feet south of subject site Boeing Renton Plant (under various listings) PACCAR Inc. 800 Park Avenue North and 800 North 6 1400 North 4th Street CSCSLNFA,WAICR,LUST,UST,US ENG CONTROLS,USINSTCONTROL CERCLIS,RCRA-SQG,CSCSL,FINDS. NPL,RODS,INST CONTROL Additional information on these sites was obtained from the "GeoEngineers Phase I and II ESA, December,2005" Additional information on these sites was obtained from the "GeoEngineers Phase I and II ESA, December,2005" 4.2 REVIEW OF REGULATORY FILES We interviewed the Ecology project manager Byung Maeng about the Boeing Renton Plant and the historic use of the subject Site,if any (additional details in Section 5.1).Based on our discussions with Mr.Maeng,he was not aware of any environmental conditions on the subject Site related to past Boeing activities.This was consistent with our review of past reports for the subject Site and our knowledge of the Site area.Although the subject Site was not specifically listed in the regulatory database search,we reviewed Ecology files for the Boeing Renton Plant (of which the subject Site was a part)and the PACCAR site which was a former superfund site and located 1,000 feet to the south (Table IV).Ecology file review information is outlined below. 4.2.1 Boeing Renton Plant The majority of Ecology's files for the Boeing Renton Plant pertained to portions of the Plant located significant distances to the west and south/southwest of the subject Site.No information pertaining to the subject Site was identified.None of the documents we reviewed solely addressed the 9.79-acre subject Site. In general,soil and/or groundwater contamination,including petroleum hydrocarbons,VOCs,metals and/or PCBs has been identified at several parts of the Boeing Renton Plant located west and south/southwest of the subject Site.These areas of contamination generally were the results of leaks or spills of hazardous substances from USTs,sumps,drums or other containers,and generally appear to be localized occurrences.Several of the areas of contamination have been or are being addressed under A RCRA Agreed Order (described below).None of the documented areas of contamination appear to directly impact the subject Site. Boeing entered into a RCRA Agreed Order with Ecology on September 25,1997.The Agreed Order defined several areas of concern (AOCs)and solid waste management units (SWMUs)at the Boeing GEOENGINEERSFileNo.8335-003-01 Page 10 March 6,2006 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I Renton Plant.No areas of the subject Site were identified as AOCs or SWMUs requiring corrective action. Based on a URS report that we reviewed ("Lot 3B Soil Cleanup Confirmation Sampling,Boeing Renton Plant,"dated January 10,2003,prepared for Boeing),a leaking one-gallon can of commercial 10%PCP solution was abandoned and leaked down a concrete light post foundation located about one block southwest of the subject Site adjacent to Park Avenue Noah in 2002.The PCP spill was cleaned up in accordance with the Boeing Renton Plant RCRA Agreed Order and Ecology issued a No Further Action (NFA)determination pertaining to the PCP spill in January 2003.This small PCP spill is located a significant distance from the subject Site and is not likely to have impacted the subject Site. 4.2.2 PACCAR Heavy equipment,including railroad cars and military vehicles were produced at the 97-acre PACCAR foundry facility from the early 1900s to 1980s.A portion of the PACCAR facility historically was used to landfill waste materials from the foundry.Metals,PCBs,phenolic compounds,VOCs,pesticides and PAHs have been detected in soil and/or groundwater at the PACCAR facility.Remedial activities at the PACCAR facility began in the 1980s under a RCRA Consent Decree with Ecology.Groundwater monitoring activities at the PACCAR facility during the 1990s/2000s indicate that groundwater beneath the PACCAR facility generally flows toward the west,and groundwater contamination at the PACCAR facility does not appear to extend north ofthe north PACCAR property boundary (along North 8th Street) about 1,000 feet south of the subject Site.Ecology reportedly indicated to Environ during their 2004 study of the 50-acre Harvest-Transwestern site that contamination at the PACCAR Superfund site, including metals,PCBs,phenolic compounds,volatile organic compounds (VOC)s,pesticides and polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs),appears to have been stabilized,and contaminant concentrations in most wells appear to be stable or decreasing.It is our opinion that there is a low potential that contamination from the PACCAR facility has impacted the subject Site. 4.3 FINDINGS Known or suspect environmental conditions were not identified by this portion of the study. 5.0 SITE HISTORY 5.1 HISTORICAL RESOURCES Our understanding of the history of the Site is based on a review of the information from the historical resources listed in Table V,our review of the previous reports/documents discussed in Section 3.5,and interviews with the individuals listed.Selected historical research documents are included in Appendix C. GEOENGINEERSFileNo8335-003-01 Page 11 March 6,2006 I I Table V.Historical Resources Reviewed ....,:;Dates;6f coverag :i Date " Description ::Pr6vider Or:inteieWeeTl i.i Ke0wiedge :".:C6ntacted;;(See sectJon 5:2'fo:findi'ngs); Historical Aerial Walker &Associates in 1936,1946,1960, Photographs3 Tukwila,Washington 1968 EDR 1977,1985,1990 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I Historical Aerial Photographs3 1998,2000 Historical Fire ..I_n_s_u.ranca__M_a_P..LHistoricalUSGS Topographic Maps Historical Aerial King County iMAP Photographs3 Historical Aerial Terra Server 2002 Photographs3 No Coverage Historical Tax tssessors Records Previous Environmental Repods Interview Interview Interview Interview EDR search of Sanborn maps EDR Washington State Archives City of Renton Carl Bach,Environmental Scientist,Boeing Ray Powers,Environmental Scientist,Boeing Byung Maeng,Ecology's Hazardous Waste Program site manager for Boeing Renton Plant Tim Gray,City of Renton Fire Department Carson Thompson,King County Health DepartmentInterview 12123105 12/23/05 12123/05 12/23/05 12/23/05 1897,1949,1950,12/23/05 1968,1973,1983 1936 to 1973 12/20105 City of Renton does not have Recent Recent 1996 to present Recent Recent 12119105, 12/20/05, 12123105 01103106 12/23/05,01/04/06 1 2/20105 12116105 12/20/05Recent )revious Phase I or Phase II Environmental Site Assessment reports for the subject Site. Mr.Bach informed us to contact Ray Powers regarding the specifics on this Site. Mr.Powers is not aware of usage of the subject Site other than a paved parking lot since its )urchase by Boeing. Mr.Maeng informed as that Ecology does not have any nformation on the subject Site parking lot.A spill was reported on the property immediately west of the Site and most likely fill matenal was brought to the site 50 to 60 'ears ago according to Mr.Maeng. Mr.Gray did not have files or ,ersonal knowledge pertaining to USTs or hazardous substance- related responses at the Site.The Fire Department's files go back about 5 to 6 years according to Mr Gray The Health Department does not have records of hazardous substance related responses or USTs on the subject Site.The Health Department has the same Site information that Ecology would have,according to Mr, Thompson I I 3 The scale of the photographs reviewed allowed for an interpretation of general site development/configuration,such as identifying most structures,roadways and clearings.However,the scale of the photographs did not allow for identification of specific site features,such as fuel pumps,wells or chemical storage areas on the site,if any. GEOENGINEERSFileNo.8335-003-01 Page 12March6,2006 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I 5.2 HISTORICAL SITE OWNERSHIP AND USE SUMMARY The subject Site is currently a vacant parking lot and is owned by DASH 80 LP.The current tax parcel ID for the subject Site,0823059217.This tax parcel also includes the Fry's Electronics store located immediately south side of the subject Site.We understand that Lowe's is in the process of subdividing this parcel.Based on the key person interview with Ray Powers of Boeing,Boeing owned this property since the 1950s.It was referred to as "tax lot 6"and the paved parking lot was constructed in approximately the 1960s based on the aerial photographs that we reviewed.Fill material was brought to the Site during these construction activities according to our interviews.However,the volume,placement or source of the fill material is not known.Prior to purchase of the Site by Boeing,the property was undeveloped based on key person interviews and aerial photographs.Based on the key person interviews, the property has always been used as a parking lot and never been used for manufacturing or chemical related activities.DASH 80 LP purchased the property from Boeing in 2000.Fry's Electronics and Retail store was built in 2002 on the south half of the subject tax parcel. 5,3 ADJACENT AND NEARBY PROPERTIES The available historical resources and previous reports we reviewed indicate that adjacent properties generally consisted of undeveloped land,farmland and residential properties prior to 1936. Properties to the North:The earliest apparent development in the site vicinity was the Puget Sound Energy Shuffieton Steam Plant which was located on property north of(not adjacent to)the Site from the early 1900s to early 2000s. Properties to the South:The PACCAR property,currently occupied by Kenworth Truck Co.,which is located approximately 1,000 feet south of the Site was used as a foundry and rail car manufacturer from the early 1900s to 1980s,and then converted to manufacture of military vehicles. Properties to the East:Burlington Northern Santa Fe railroad is located immediately east of the Site. The railroad appears in the aerial photographs since 1936.The parcels to the east of the railroad,along the Houser Way,first appear in the aerial photographs between 1960 and 1968.Mr.Ray Powers with Boeing informed us that the parcels to the east of the railroad were owned by Boeing and these were termed as "10-70s"buildings.These buildings were primarily used as warehouses,laboratories or small scale part finishing was performed in this area but no manufacturing occurred in these buildings according to Mr.Powers. Keller Supply and Company,located at 925,Houser Way North,was built in 1965.This is a wholesale plumbing supply company.Layfield Group (Geomembranes Supply)occupies the parcel south of Keller's Suppy &Co.Whitehall laboratories (Division of America Home Products),located at 915 Houser Way was built in 1966 and Beadex Manufacturing (supply of building materials)located at 833 Houser Way North was built in 1972.Other businesses that first appeared in the city directory search in 1975 include Western State Sales Inc.,Pacific Agro Co.,and A.R.Smith &Co.Whole Feed &Grain. Properties to the West:The available historical resources indicate that owners of the 10-60s building complex located immediately west of the Site across the Garden Avenue North,have included "Pac. Coast R.R.Co."and "C.P.S.Ry Co."(circa 1908 to unknown date),Department of Defense (unknown date to early 1960s),The Boeing Company (early 1960s to early 2005),and Transwestern Harvest Lakeshore,LLC (early 2005 to present).Property ownership records prior to 1908 were not identified. Historical aerial photographs and topographic maps indicate that these parcels were vegetated and undeveloped prior to construction of the 10-60s complex in the 1960s.The 10-60s complex buildings GEOENGINEERSFileNo.8335-003 OI Page I3March6,2006 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I were demolished in 1999 when a parking lot was constructed.Currently the Site is a vacant lot,planned for residential development. Construction of the 10-50s airplane manufacturing complex on property located to the west of (not adjacent to)the site began in the 1950s.Grading activities are apparent south and southeast of the site in the 1960 aerial photograph.The 10-50s complex was demolished in 2005. 5.4 ENVIRONMENTAL LIENS OR PROPERTY USE RESTRICTIONS During the course of our research,we did not find that environmental liens had been filed against the Site. 5.5 FINDINGS Additional known or suspect environmental conditions were not identified by this portion of the study. 6.0 ADDITIONAL SERVICES 6.1 FEDERAL EMERGENCY FLOOD PLAIN MAPS REVIEW We reviewed the "Flood Insurance Rate Maps (Map No.53033C0664 and 53033C0664)"by Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA)revised,May 16,1995.The Site is located in "Zone X" determined as an area outside the 500-year flood plain.A zoning map is included in Appendix D,while the FEMA flood plain maps are attached in Appendix E. 6.2 WATER SUPPLY WELL DATABASE SEARCH We reviewed the Washington State Department of Ecology's well log database to identify wells on or adjacent to the subject Site.No drinking water or irrigation wells were identified on the subject Site.A resource protection well,"Well log ID:106000"is located at the southern boundary of the parcel,on the Fry's property.The well log is attached in Appendix F.A total of 492 well logs were reviewed adjacent to the subject Site and were identified as resource protection or observation or dewatering wells.Based on our review,none of these wells apparently were used as water supply wells. 6.3 ENDANGERED OR PROTECTED FLORA AND FAUNA REVIEW A map from Priority Habitat and Species (PHS)from the Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife was requested and reviewed.An osprey (Pandion haliaetus)nest is noted to occur on a cell tower just off the Site.It is northeast of the Site across the railroad tracks.This species is not listed nor is it a candidate for listing as a threatened or endangered species by the state or under the Endangered Species Act.The state considers it a "state monitor"species,which simply means that it is being watched for signs of impacts to its populations and habitats.There are no management regulations associated with this species,and its presence in the proximity of the Lowe's Renton site would not affect any development activities at that Site. The only species listed under the Endangered Species Act (ESA)that is known to occur within a mile of the Site is the Puget Sound Chinook salmon.This species is found in Lake Washington (about 1,500 feet north of the Site)and in the Cedar River (about 4,000 feet west of the site).These occurrences are not close enough to affect development activities on the Site. GEOENGINEERSFileNo.8335-003-01 Page 14 March 6,2006 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I The Washington Department of Natural Resources FPARS interactive mapping system map indicated a small fish-bearing stream (about 5,000 feet long)running east of the Site and parallel to 1-405 before it changes course and flows into Lake Washington.PHS report did not show this feature,indicating it either doesn't exist or is too inconsequential to appear in this report.We did not find this stream during our site reconnaissance. The only other ESA-listed species that could have the potential to occur in the general site vicinity is the bald eagle,and the presence of an active bald eagle nest could limit development activities at certain times of year.However,the highly urbanized and industrialized nature of the area makes it highly unlikely that a bald eagle nest would be present anywhere near the Site.The PHS data confirmed this finding. There are no other species or habitats of concern nor are there any wetlands on or in the immediate vicinity of the Site.GeoEngineers representative conducted a physical evaluation of endangered flora and fauna during site reconnaissance. 6.4 HISTORIC STRUCTURES,ARCHEOLOGICAL AND CULTURAL RESOURCES REVIEW GeoEngineers visited the Washington Department of Archeology and Historic Preservation located in Olympia,Washington on January 3,2006 and searched the state Archeology,Historic Properties,and Registered sites databases.No structures or archeological/cultural resources were listed,located on or adjacent to the subject property. 6.5 SURFACE WATER EVALUATION AND WETLANDS DETERMINATION Wetlands specialist James Rybock,Principal,GeoEngineers Inc.reviewed a Site aerial photograph (TerraServer),National Wetlands Inventory (NWI)maps,StreamNet database,Washington Department ofNatural Resources FPARS interactive mapping system and King County IMap (hydrography for Water Resource Inventory Area 8).The closest NWI-mapped wetlands are associated with the shoreline ofLake Washington,approximately 1,500 feet north of the Site.Based on the prior disturbance and uses ofthe Site,it is unlikely that non-mapped wetlands occur on the Site or in the immediate area that could be affected by site development.Furthermore,it is unlikely that any offsite wetlands would have regulated buffers that extend onto the Site.A copy of the Wetlands Determination Letter is included in Appendix G 6.6 GROUNDWATER SAMPLING 6.6.1 General GeoEngineers conducted a Geotechnical Engineering Study between December 2005 and January 2006 on the subject property.Seven hollow stem auger borings (B-1 through B-7)and four cone penetration tests (CPT-1 through CPT-4)were completed on the subject property.The approximate boring locations are shown on Figure 2.Three one-inch diameter Piezometers were installed in B-4 (MW-1),B-5 (MW-2) and B-7 (MW-3)to facilitate groundwater sampling.Approximately 4 to 12 feet of silty sand with gravel fill generally overlying alluvium consisting of interbedded layers of sand,silt,and peat was observed on the subject Site based on our geotechnical explorations.Fill material was encountered to depths ranging from 5 to 13 feet below the ground surface (bgs)and consisted of medium dense to very dense silty sand with gravel.The fill thickness was observed to be variable with no consistent thickness pattern across the site. GEOENGINEERSFileNo.8335-003-01 Page 15 March 6,2006 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I The groundwater depth varied between 6 to 8 feet bgs in the monitoring wells installed.The groundwater flows generally to the northwest based on topography and our field measurements. The monitoring wells were constructed to depths of 16.5 feet bgs,with 5 to 10 feet of screen at the base of each well.The well screens were constructed at the base of the wells so that the lower portion of the shallow,unconfined aquifer (where solvents,a common area-wide contaminant,likely would reside in this aquifer)could be sampled. Field procedures,field screening methods and the boring logs are included in Appendix H.Water level data and groundwater chemical analytical results are summarized in Tables 1 and 2.Laboratory reports and our Quality Assurance/Quality Control (QA/QC)review are included in Appendix I. 6.2.2 Groundwater Groundwater was encountered in the geotechnical borings during drilling at shallow depths (approximately 7.5 feet bgs).The groundwater monitoring wells are located along the central portion of the Site and provide general coverage of the Site.Static groundwater levels were measured in the monitoring wells on January 17,2006.Depths to water in the monitoring wells ranged from approximately 6.26 to 7.83 feet bgs.Relative groundwater elevations were calculated based on the January 17,2006 groundwater measurements (Table 1).Shallow groundwater beneath the Site generally appears to flow towards the northwest based on the water level measurements,surface topography,and the relative location ofthe Cedar River to the west and Lake Washington to the north. Groundwater samples were obtained from monitoring wells MW-I through MW-3 on January 17,2006, and each sample was submitted for chemical analysis of hydrocarbon identification using DOE method NWTPH-HCID,HVOCs using EPA method 8260B,and dissolved metals using EPA 6000/7000 series methods. Hydrocarbon identification.Gasoline range-,kerosene range-,diesel range-,insulating oil range-, heavy fuel oil range-,and lube oil range-hydrocarbons were not detected in the groundwater samples tested.However,lube oil range-hydrocarbons were detected (742 gg/l)and slightly exceeded the MTCA Method A cleanup level (500 gg/l)in MW-1. VOCs.Tetrachloroethene (a VOC)was detected at concentrations lower than established MTCA Method A cleanup levels in groundwater samples obtained from monitoring wells MW-2 and MW-3 (0.500 and 0.250 p_g/l respectively).Other VOCs were not detected in the groundwater samples tested.Breakdown products of Tetrachloroethene (Trichloroethene,1,2 dichloroethene and vinyl chloride)were not detected in the groundwater tested. Dissolved Metals.Arsenic was detected at concentrations greater than the established MTCA Method A cleanup level (for total arsenic)of 5 gg/l in groundwater samples tested from all the three monitoring wells MW-1 through MW-3.Barium,chromium and selenium were detected in two or more monitoring wells at concentrations less than established MTCA Method A or Method B cleanup levels (for total metals)in the groundwater samples tested.MTCA cleanup levels for dissolved metals have not been established.Dissolved silver,cadmium,mercury and lead were not detected in the groundwater tested. The presence of elevated arsenic concentrations in groundwater in the Cedar River Valley (including the area of the subject Site)is common.The results from the subject Site wells are consistent with concentrations found at other sites in the area. GEOENGINEERSFileNo.8335-003-01 Page 16 March 6,2006 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I 7.0 CONCLUSIONS 7.1 PHASE I ESA AND GROUNDWATER SAMPLING CONCLUSIONS Our Phase l ESA was conducted in general accordance with the scope and limitations of ASTM E 1527- 00 and our October 21,2005 proposal that included the additional Lowe's-speeific scope of work.Based on the results of our Phase I ESA study,we did not identify environmental conditions related to past or present site uses that had the potential for hazardous substances to impact soil or groundwater beneath the Site. However,because of known area-wide groundwater contamination associated with past industrial use of adjacent properties,groundwater testing was completed for several contaminants of concern in existing monitoring wells at the Site.The following summarizes the groundwater findings. •There was one location (MW-1)that had lube oil-range hydrocarbons that slightly exceeded the MTCA Method A cleanup level.The data suggest that the concentration represents a localized and limited area of contamination.In our opinion,this concentration should not impact site ownership or site development.However,if future withdrawal of groundwater is planned for the subject Site,then it may be appropriate to re-evaluate groundwater conditions prior to off site discharge. •Arsenic was detected at concentrations exceeding MTCA Method A cleanup levels in the groundwater samples obtained from all three wells.Based on the Phase I ESA research,presence of arsenic in nearby monitoring wells at similar concentrations and our knowledge of the Puget Sound area,it is common to see elevated arsenic concentrations in shallow unconfined groundwater in valleys similar to the Cedar River valley.It appears that the elevated arsenic is an area-wide issue with no specific source on the subject Site.With respect to potential groundwater contamination,Washington Law exempts a property owner or operator from classification as an "Owner/Operator"should contamination have migrated to their site from an off-site source [RCW 70.105D.020(12)(b)(iv)].In our opinion,the detected arsenic concentrations should not impact site ownership or site development.However,if future withdrawal of groundwater is planned for the subject Site,then it may be appropriate to re-evaluate groundwater conditions prior to off site discharge. •Soil testing was not performed as a part of our supplemental groundwater testing program.Based on our geotechnical explorations,fill material was encountered to depths ranging from 5 to 13 feet bgs.Although there was no evidence to suggest that fill has been impacted,the source ofthe fill is not known.Based on the results of our studies,it is our opinion that the planned site development that has been described to us is technically feasible relative to environmental conditions at the Site.In order to facilitate redevelopment,if fill soil is planned to be exported off-site,we recommend that (1)a soil testing program be established prior to off-site soil transport and (2)a contingency for the removal,handling and treatment/disposal of contaminated soil be included in the construction budget for in the event that testing or physical evidence of contamination is encountered during construction,(3)a contaminated soil and groundwater handling plan be prepared to guide the contractor in managing potentially contaminated soil and groundwater. 8.0 LIMITATIONS This report has been prepared for use by Lowe's HIW Inc.GeoEngineers has performed this Phase I ESA with additional services of the proposed 9.79-acre portion of the Lowe's Renton Site located at the southeast comer of the intersection of North Park Drive and Garden Avenue North in Renton, GEOENGINEERSFileNo8335-003-01 Page 17 March 6,2006 I I I I ! I I I I I I I I I I ! I I Washington in general accordance with the scope and limitations of our agreements dated October 21, 2005 and ASTM E 1527-00,Standard Practice for Phase I ESAs.Please note that ASTM has established a new standard,E1527-05,that is consistent with EPA's new All Appropriate Inquiries (AAI)rule for Phase I ESAs.Either standard (the -00 or -05)is acceptable until November I,2006 when the -05 standard will supersede the -00 standard.It is possible to update this Phase I ESA to make it compliant with the new standard,but the new standard was not requested or contemplated at the time that the proposal was prepared for this project. Within the limitations of scope,schedule and budget,our services have been executed in accordance with the generally accepted environmental science practices for Phase I ESAs in this area at the time this report was prepared.No warranty or other conditions,express or implied,should be understood. Any electronic form,facsimile or hard copy of the original document (email,text,table,and/or figure),if provided,and any attachments are only a copy of the original document.The original document is stored by GeoEngineers,Inc.and will serve as the official document of record. Please refer to Appendix J titled "Report Limitations and Guidelines for Use"for additional information pertaining to use of this report. GEOENGINEERSFileNo,8335-003-01 Page 18 March 6,2006 I I I TABLE 1 SUMMARY OF WATER LEVEL DATA PROPOSED LOWES'RENTON 800 GARDEN AVENUE NORTH RENTON,WASHINGTON I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I Well Number1 B-4 Casing Elevation MW-3 Casing Depth 101.20 Depth to water (feet) 4.90 15.08 99.38 MW-1 100.96 14.82 7.83 93.13 MW-2 101.30 14.50 7.58 93.72 6.26 94.94 Water Table Elevation 94.48 Notes: 1Wells were surveyed on January 17,2006.The approximate exploration locations are shown in Figure 2. SOft-site monitoring well location used as a benchmark. SEAT:88335003\01\Finals833500301 T1 ,xls File No.8335-003-01 GEOFNGINEERS n< mmm I m 9 o -r =3 •o (3 o C -0 C)z -I- ._o o_.5 oo . 0 O).--",,,, z 8t l ! I I I I I I I I I I ! I I I I I \, o Renton 0 1 .CO0 2,000AllLOCationsareapproximate. Lambert Confonal Conic Washington State Plane North North Amedcan Datum 1983 Data Sources:Interstates,state routes,and roads from TIGER 2000. County beundadas,cities,and waterbodies from Department of Ecology. B GEOENGINEERS.; iFee|N z l|t :3- m CE ; NE E2 SE 5th St VICINITY MAP FIGURE 1 I I O3 1 _l X1 CO O S O 0D (13031 I C,J EI°,'7 EOIzaEI-- I oJ I II ° LL OOLOr'b CO /IC)< / t3OO t-'3r'3CO / IJJQI KELLER I ISUPPLYCO.WHOLESALE OFFICE &PLUMBING WAREHOUSE &SUPPLY I LAYFIELDGROUP IOFFICE|(GEOMEMBRANE| SUPPLY),I -LI I I\1 I \_. VACANT LOT (PLANNED RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT) ......i I i Notes: t.The locations of all features shown are approximate. 2.This drawing is for information purposes.It is intended to assist in showing features discussed in an attached document.GeoEngineers,Inc.can not guarantee the accuracy and content of e]ectronie files.The masterfile is stored by GeoEnginaers,Inc.and will serve as the official record of this communication. 3.All the features represented in lighter shade are proposed features. Reference:Lowe's of Renton conceptual site plan by Pacland. l Inferred Groundwater Flow Direction •MW-1 Monitoring Well i-B-1 Boring A CPT-1 Cone Penetration Test El Unlabelled 55 Gallon Drums []Storm Drain ()Pole Mounted Transformer 100 O 100 FEET Site Plan Proposed Lowe's Renton Renton,Washington GEOENGINEERS Figure 2 I l I I I I I I I I I I I I l I I I I 00 O. O_ oo DLLJC FACING NORTH LOOKING FROM THE SITE FACING SOUTH LOOKING FROM THE SITE GEOENGINEERS Earth Science +Technology SITE PHOTOGRAPHS -DECEMBER 2005 FIGURE 3 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I W FACING EAST LOOKING FROM THE SITE GEOENGINEERS Earth Science 4-Technology SITE PHOTOGRAPHS -DECEMBER 2005 FIGURE 4 I I I I I i I I I I I I I I I I I I I D. LOOKING FROM NORTHERN SIDE OF THE SITE LOOKING FROM THE SOUTHERN BOUNDARY OF THE SITE GEOENGINEERS Earth Science +Technology SITE PHOTOGRAPHS -DECEMBER 2005 FIGURE 5 I I I I I i I I I I I I I I I I I I I D O 0a o LOOKING ALONG GEOENGINEER Earth Science +Technology THE EASTERN ......i ¸.... BOUNDARY OF THE SITE SITE PHOTOGRAPHS -DECEMBER 2005 FIGURE 6 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I GEOENGINEERS APPENDIX A SIGNED A GREEMENT I SUtr 60"L F 206.522.86-4 II,,_ .SS.'TTLE,WA 98"i09 WV,'W.pACLAN.COM I (._... I December 12,2005 -.. SENT VIA FAX AN D MAIL:(206)"728-2732 -Cook,David A.LG' GeoEngineers ' 600 Stewart Street,Suite 1700 Seattle,WA 98101 I Subject:Proposed Lowe's;Renton,Washington " Environmental Evaluation Services I Dear Mr.Cook:") We have received your proposal,dated October 21,2005,to provide services to prepare a Phase i Environmental Site Assessment for the above referenced project.Your work Shall be in accordance with our request for proposal,local 'code requirements,if applicable,and as defined in your proposal,including Scope items I through 1 I,and the Additional Scope Elements,except as modified in this letter agreement. -'--You will be compensated on a fixed fee basis for your work,Your authorized fee for thls ........effort is $7,500.Your contract lee shall.not be exceeded without prior written "•• authorization.A copy of your report shall be provided to PACLAND by January E,2006.= Our contract with out client contains specific contract conditions.These conditions are I reflected in the attached General Conditions for Subconsultant Contracts,which are hereby made a part of this letter agreement.GeoEngineers,Inc.shall maintain insurance coverage (---with an approved insurance company with an AM Best rating of A-or better for the duration _)"of this project (and for professional liability insurance,for a period of five years after " substantial completion of the work designed by the Consultant).GeoEngineers,Inc.is solely responsible and liable for its professional services.PACLAND shall be held harmless for any qegligent acts,errors or omissions by GeoEngineers,Inc.GeoEngineers,Inc.shall maintain Errors and Omissions Insurance with a minimum $2,000,000 coverage. GeoEngineers,Inc.shall also maintain General liability insurance,with a minimum $2,000,000 coverage,and Automobile liability insurance,with a minimum $1,000,000. PACLAND shall be listed as an additional insured on this General/Auto liability insurance. A copy of your Certificate of insurance shall be provided to PACLAND.You are authorized to accomplish the work defined in your proposal,subject to your agreement to be bound to I the terms of this letter agreement. PACLAN D prepares our client invoices during the first week of each month.Therefore,to expedite your payment,please prepare ,our invoices and submit them to PACLAND's i! ! •.-..- /.- 12/13/2005 Tb-E 11:52 •z Page 2 " David A..Cook December 12,2005 FA 206 S228S44 PACLAND -Seattle 002/005 Seattle Office by the first of each month for your prior month's services.Your invoices shall reference PACLAND project #2005127.014,and shall include a summary of current charges,total charges,and budget remaining.Invoices lacking this information'will be returned,unprocessed,for correction. Please counter-sign below to reflect our acceptance of these contract terms and return a copy to PACLAND for our files. Principal Approved::_,Date:,,l.,rGeoEngineers,Inc. MDC:jlm Enclosures 2005127.014-13/relwdch01 I =| I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I i 12/13/2005TUE 11:53 FAX 206 5228344 PACLtND -Seattle 1003/005 I I ! I I ,. I l;\..• ! ! I I I I I PA CLA ND GENERAl.CONDI3"IONS.FOR SUBCONSUI-TANT CONTRACTS 1.0 Starrd of Pedormane:Subconsultant secvicesshell be peftrrned in a manner consistent with the standard of pofessidnal care,skill and diligence that are customary for proiects of the type and conlplexlty as herein described.All work shall be performed by quated personnel under the supervlsidn of,or performed dlrect3y by.person lcnsed •to practice In the S.taba where the project Is located. 7he SubcnnsuIant'service hall he acccrnlHshed in tnformane vvth all arllt',blt la,,w,znde%otdlnanc,atd rethllnn any £¢x,rnmanlla',n c'v having jurisdiction over these servicesor the project. 2.0 Uabll and Indemnlflcaon: It is hereby agreed that PACLAND and'or its client for whom the 5ubconultant servicesare being prfomed shall be held harmless for any neoigant acts,errors, or omissions by the Subconsultant "hese services may fodude,bt are not limlted Io 5uveyfog,Geoechnic.al Invesg6ons,Envlronne.ntal testing and COnSultation,Wellancl consultatidn,Trac engineering and others.The 5ubconsultant Is completelyand sofelyaccountable for all field measuemants, clculations,and technical staternaots regerdng th thoroughness and accuracy ofall drawings,tepocts and documents prepared by the 5ubconsullaot. The Subconsultant shall defend,Indemnify and save PACLAND and/or its cre for whom the Subcortsl.tant so'vices are being performed from any claims for damage to property,death or njury to persons,fos and expense incluclin attorney'fees and costs caused by the negllgert acts,errors or omlssidn tf the Subconsulrant. 1.5 Lien Waivers: Subconsultant shall provide PACLAND wish partial or final,as ap!=coprlate,llenwai,..'s aed/or releases,and shall obtain and retain partial or final,as appropriate, lien w'alve,s and/or reeaes TOm al Subconsultams a a cordi.tidn ofeach appJication f payment undar 1his agreernt.,Said Ifen waivers and/€tefeases ha[I be fo such fetra as may be required by applicable laws,or "to the extent applicable laws do not dtctate form,the ame shall be in such form aS may be requied b7 PACLAND korn .tirne-.to-time hereunder.Subcnsultant hereby a'ee to indemnify,defend Cd so requested by PACLAND)and hold PACLAND and PACI_AI'4D's Client harmless 0rn and against any and all liens or other claims whatsoever fifed against PACLAND,PACLAND's Client,ar the Proiec IW any lienor for work pedo/'med in connection with the services for which 5ubconsultant as been paid. 3.0 Insurance Coverage:The Subconsultan.t sall own and naidtain general liabilil-/and professional ecs and ornissltms irtsuranc coverage for the duration d ths oject.A cer(Ificte of Insurance shalt be proviced ta PACLAND upon requesL 4.0 OwnerShip of Oocuments" Followin the full payment for Subconsuhant services tendered,all reports,drawings,maps,charts,sbecica.tions and instruments of the SubensLican servlce hall be jolnfy owned by PACLAND and its cllent for whom these secvlces were rendered.t is expressly agrccd tha.t all documeots are to be prepared for use on project idertified n this agreement for ofessional sessions. 5.0 Compensation and Payment: Compensation will he fo accdance wlth th scop o eJvices,bdgets and fee :hedules described in this agreement for professional services-PACLAND wll nvo¢e ts client for Suborsultent services monthfy.Payment shall be made to be Subconsultant within fifteen ('i5)days of receipt of paymen To PACLAND from its Client for thse Subconsutent services. I=t Fixed Fee conlracs,all expenses,including reimbursable expenses,shall be included in fee.Fixed Fee invoices wilt include the approved fee amount, petcentege complete,prevfousl7 bt[led amount,cvr,en amount beln invoiced,and a summary o"work parformed. Fo Time and Expeases coaact,easonable job related expanseswill be reimbursed at actual cosL except fo the folfowing:hotel room charges over SBO.00.. pet night,car rental charges over $55.00 per day,gas tank rell on rsntal cars provided by rental agency,mifeage relrnbtremea over 30 cents per mile,fax machine and plottingcharges.Meals will onfy he reimbursed fo over,night or longer rlps.Maximum ex-enditure is $25 per day includia reasonable tps of no more han 15%,pet c'=rsoa.Meal cosls for one-day trips are not reirnbca'sabfe.Alcoholic beve,raes are not relrnbursable.Copies of receipts for all reimbursed ecpanses shall he ncLuded with invoices. 6.0 Agreement Ievisfor:• This 'ofessonal etvlc.areernent shall not be modlfed,amended,extended or changec in any manner except in writing and sgned by persons authorized Io represent the 5ubconsultnt aid PACLAND. 7.0 Agremenl Tet'mfoaton: PACLANC)may terminate this oessfonal services a'ee,rnent for convenienL'e and withou cause upon seven (7)days ,,wtten ,otice co the Subconsullant, The Subcorsu]ten may temteate ths professional servic:s a'eemen.t upon svaa (7)days vwircen no0ce for feature of PACLAO to maEe payrneL n accordano wilb the lerms contained herin. Upon xecuor and reo]pt hy P,a,CLAND and the 5ubconullant,the attached docJrnent and ths General Condi.tics for 5ubcosultant Contracts shall form the professidnal services agreement between PACLAND and the Subconsuhant. 9.0 Severabil|zfan7parof[he professiona set'vice5 agreemnl and thes8 attached GenetaJ Conditions for Subconstllant Contracts is found to b void or ursnfoceable by a court of competent jurisdiction,the rc*mafodet of thi agreemen shalJ renain n full force,and effect. !Pxevised 08/04 I I I I ! I GEOENG!NEERS' January 9,2006 Lowe's HIW Inc. •c/o PacLand 11235 SE 6th Street,Suite 220 Bellevue,Washington 98004 I I I I Attention:Steve Pesce SERVICES AGREEMENT FILE NO.8335-003-01 TASK 1 This confirms the agreement between Lowe's HIW Inc.c/o PacLand and GeoEngineers,Inc.for groundwater sampling and testing at the proposed Lowe's Renton project located southeast of the intersection of Garden Avenue and Park Avenue in Renton,Washington.The purpose ofthese services is to evaluate the potential for groundwater impacts beneath the subject site.Although no sources of contamination have been identified originating from the subject site based on our Phase I ESA research,the potential exists for groundwater contamination beneath the site from off-site or area-wide contaminants that have been observed in the site area from past industrial activities.The services provided by GeoEngineers, Inc.will consist of: I i I I ! I 1.Survey the top of casing elevations for the three existing groundwater monitoring wells that were installed during our geotechnical engineering exploration program. 2.Monitor the depth to groundwater and collect groundwater samples from each of the three monitoring wells. 3.Submit one groundwater sample from each well to a chemical analytical laboratory for analysis of petroleum hydrocarbons by Ecology Method NWTPH-HC1D,halogenated volatile organic compounds (HVOCs)by EPA Method 8260B,and RCRA Metals by EPA Method 6000/7000 series. 4.Analyze the data and incorporate the findings in the Phase I ESA which is currently DRAFT pending the groundwater sampling. The professional services listed above will be provided in accordance with the terms described in the attached General Conditions,which is a part of this agreement.Please review our General Conditions carefully and advise us ifyou have any questions or desire to modify the terms ofour agreement. The fee for the services described above will be determined on a time-and-expense basis using the rates indicated on the attached Schedule of Charges.We estimate that our fee for the services outlined above will be approximately I.We will keep you informed of project status and advise you if it appears appropriate to modify the scope and budget. i i Please note the following about our fee estimate (1)it includes '.'for installation of three groundwater monitoring wells that we unaccounted for in our geotechnical engineering estimate and (2)it assumes standard turnaround for chemical analytical testing (which is two weeks for some analytes).Quicker tumarotmd can be requested for an increase in fee (up to a 100%increase in the analytical cost for rapid,24- --i Lowe'sHIW Inc. e/o PacLand lanuaTy 9,2006 Page 2 hour tumound).The chemical analticEil testing porton ofo estimated fee S $1 500 tiased-onstandard arllarout12d. The service dgeribed above are:iUth0reCi by: Client GeOEnglneers,Inc. By:By.:David ,Cgbk;LG' Title:.Title:Associate Date:Date:January:9/2006. *ndlVidnal ,ith C0riti'ag autho d spansible f6rpalmcnt 0fGoErs;Inc:sS. AttaChments:2005 General Conditions (Stafidard) 2005 Schedule of Charges: Please Return Or/e Signed Copy ofTliis Agreenent fOr:Otir,File OAC:jm .........SEAT:W3350030 IWinals33500301Sve,Agrmnt.dc •otc¢/mztrbii€fo faai]orbd.,ort o mt (m,,,;tz4,0itagm),!rt,i d iy .c,.an only a cgpyof 0c glpal dL Te docaxnzat is stoodby _Geongnce;!he,anclv0_l[scrw as he QfCm]doctjmcn[€l: !Flel 8335-003-01 Tuakl EOENGINEERS. I I I I I I ! I I I I I I I I I I I I GEOENGINEERS APPENDIX B ENVIRONMENTAL DATA RESOURCES (EDR)REPORT I I SECTION PAGE Executive Summary.......................................................ES1 Overview Map_..........................................................2 Detail Map_.............................................................3 Map Findings Summary....................................................4 Map Findings_•..........................................................6 Orphan Summary_.......................................................56 EI:;A Waste Codes_......................................................EPA-1 Government Records Searched/Data Currency Tracking_.........................GR-1 GEOCHECK ADDENDUM Physical Setting Source Addendum_.........................................A-1 Physical Setting Source Summary...........................................A-2 Physical Setting Source Map_..............................................A-8 Physical Setting Source Map Findings........................................A-9 Physical Setting Source Records Searched....................................A-21 Thank you for your business. Please contact EDR at 1-800o352-0050 with any questions or comments. Disclaimer -Copyright and Trademark Notice I I I I I I I I I I I I This Report contains certain information obtained from a variety of pubtic and other sources reasonably available to Environmental DataResources,Inc.It cannot be concluded from this Report that coverage information for the target and surrounding properties does not exist fromothersources.NO WARRANTY EXPRESSED OR IMPLIED,IS MADE WHATSOEVER IN CONNECTION WITH THIS REPORT.ENVIRONMENTALDATARESOURCES,INC.SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIMS THE MAKING OF ANY SUCH WARRANTIES,INCLUDING WITHOUT UMITATION,MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR USE OH PURPOSE.ALL RISK IS ASSUMED BY THE USER.IN NO EVENT SHALLENVIRONMENTALDATARESOURCES,INC.BE UABLE TO ANYONE.WHETHER ARISING OUT OF ERRORS OR OMISSIONS,NEGLIGENCE,ACCIDENT OR ANY OTHER CAUSE,FOR ANY LOSS OF DAMAGE.INCLUDING.WITHOUT LIMITATION,SPECIAL,INCIDENTAL.CONSEQUENTIAL,OR EXEMPLARY DAMAGES.ANY LIAEILITY ON THE PARTOF ENVIRONMENTAL DATA RESOURCES,INC.IS STRICTLYLIMITEDTOAREFUNDOFTHEAMOUNTPAIDFORTHISREPORT.Purchaser accepts this Report "AS S'.Any analyses,estimates,ratings,environmental dsk levels or dsk codes provided in this Report are provided for illustrative purposes only,and are not intended to provide,norshouldtheybeinterpretedasprovidinganyfactsregarding,or prediction orforecast of,any environmental risk for any property.Only a Phase IEnvironmentalSiteAssessmentperformedbyanenvironmental0rofessionalcanprovideinformationregardingtheenvironmentalriskforanyproperty.Additionally,the information provided in thisReport is not to be construed as legal advice. Copyright 2005 by Environmental Data Resources,Inc.All rights reserved.Reproduction in any media or format,in wholeorinpart,of any report or map of Environmental Data Resources,Inc.,or its affiliates,is prohibited without prior written permission. EDR and its legos (including Sanborn and Sanborn Map)are trademarks of Environmental Data Resources,Inc.or its affi[iatas.All otherITademarksusedhereinarethepropertyoftheirrespecveowners. TC1575426.1s Page1 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I A search of available environmental records was conducted by Environmental Data Resources,Inc (EDR). The report was designed to assist parties seeking to meet the search requirements of EPA's Standards and Practices for All Appropriate Inquiries (40 CFR Part 312),the ASTM Standard Practice for Environmental Site Assessments (E 1527-05)or custom requirements developed for the evaluation of environmental risk associated with a parcel of real estate. TARGET PROPERTY INFORMATION ADDRESS 800 GARDEN AVENUE NORTH RENTON,WA 98055 COORDINATES Latitude (North):47.500100 -47"30'0.4" Longitude (West):122.199500-122"11'58.2" Universal Trenverse Mercator:Zone 10UTMX(Meters):560290.0 UTM Y (Meters):5260832.5 Elevation:36 It.above sea level USGS TOPOGRAPHIC MAP ASSOCIATED WITH TARGET PROPERTY Target Property: Source: 47122-E2 MERCER ISLAND,WA USGS 7.5 min quad index TARGET PROPERTY SEARCH RESULTS The target property was not listed in any of the databases searched by EDR. DATABASES WITH NO MAPPED SITES No mapped sites were found in EDR's search of available "reasonably ascertainable ")government records either on the target property or within the search radius around the target property for the following databases: FEDERAL RECORDS Proposed NPL ..............Proposed National Priority List Sites Delisted NPL_................National Priority List Deletions NPL Liens....................Federal Superfund Liens ERNS......................Emergency Response Notification System HMIRS.......................Hazardous Materials Information Reporting System DOD..........................Department of Defense Sites FUDS........................Formerly Used Defense Sites US BROWNFIELDS..........A Listing of Brownfields Sites CONSENT....................Superfund (CERCLA)Consent Decrees UMTRA_.....................Uranium Mill Tailings Sites TC1575426.1s EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 1 I I -..,."::--,.;.....EXECUTIVE SUMMARY :,..........,-:,.:I ODL ..........................Open Dump Inventory TRIS_........................Toxic Chemical Release Inventory System TSCA........................Toxic Substances Control ActFTrsINSP_..................FIFRA/TSCA Tracking System -FIFRA (Federal Insecticide,Fungicide,& .Rodenticide Act)/TSCA (Toxic Substances Control Act) SSTS.........................Section 7 Tracking Systems PADS_.......................PCB Activ[Database System MLTS........................Matedal Licensing Tracking System MINES.......................Mines Master Index File RAATS.......................RCRA Administrative Action Tracking System STATE AND LOCAL RECORDS HSL.........................Hazardous Sites List SWFILF_.....................Solid Waste Facility Database AST_.........................Aboveground Storage Tank Locations SPILLS.......................Reported Spills DRYCLEANERS.............Drycleaaer List CDL ........................Clandestine Drug Lab Contaminated Site List EMI_..........................Washington Emissions Data System TRIBAL RECORDS INDIAN RESERV.............Indian Reservations INDIAN LUST_...............Leaking Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land INDIAN UST..................Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land EDR PROPRIETARY RECORDS Coal Gas.....................Coal Gas SURROUNDING SITES:SEARCH RESULTS Surrounding sites were dentified. Elevations have been determined from the USGS Digital Elevation Model and should be evaluated on a relative (not an absolute)basis.Relative elevation information between sites of close proximity should be field verified;Sites with an elevation equal to or higher than the target property have been dfferentiated below from sites with an elevation lower than the target property, Page numbers and map identification numbers refer to the EDR Radius Map report Where detailed data on ndividual sites can be reviewed. Sites listed in bold itafics are in multiple databases. Unmappable (o)han)sites are not considered in the foregoing analysis• FEDERAL RECORDS NPL:Also known as Superfund,the National Priority List database is a subset of CERCLIS and identifies over 1,200 sites for priority cleanup under the Superfund program.The source ofthis database is the U.S.EPA. A review of the NPL list,as provided by EDR,and dated 07/01/2005 has revealed that there is 1 NPL TC1575426.1s EXECUTIVE SUMMARy 2 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I ,I I I I I I I I I I I I site within approximately 1.125 miles of the target property. Equal/Higher Elevation Address Dist /Dir Map ID Page PACCAR INCORPORATED 1400 NORTH 4TH STREET 1/2 -1 S 0 6 CERCLIS-NFRAP:As of February 1995.CERCLIS sites designated "No Further Remedial Action Planned"(NFRAP) have been removed from CERCLIS.NFRAP sites may be sites where,following an initial investigation,no contamination was found,contamination was removed quickly without the need for the site to.be placed on the . NPL,or the contamination was not serious enough to T'equire Federal Superfund Action or NPL consideration. EPA has removed approximately 25,000 NFRAP sites to lift the unintended barriers to the redevelopment of these properties and has archved them as historical records so EPA does not needlessly repeat the investigations in the future.This policy change is part of the EPA's Brownfields Redevelopment Program to help cities,states, private investors and affected citizens to promote economic redevelopment of unproductive urban sites. A review of the CERC-NFRAP list,as provided by EDR,and dated 08122/2005 has revealed that there is 1 CERC-NFRAP site within approximately 0.625 miles of the target property. Equal/Higher Elevation Address Dist I Dfr Map ID Page BOEING RENTON 800 N 6TH ST 1/2 -1 SSW 15 35 CORRACTS:CORRACTS is a list of handlers with RCRA Corrective Action Activity.This report shows which nationally-defined corrective action core events have occurred for every handler that has had corrective action activity. A review of the CORRACTS list,as provided by EDR,and dated 10/13/2005 has revealed that there is 1. CORRACTS site within approximately 1.125 miles of the target property. Equal/Higher Elevation Address Dist I Dir Map ID BOEING RENTON 800 N 6TH ST 1/2 -1 SSW 15 Page 35 RCRAInfo:RCRAInfo is EPA's comprehensive informa0on system,providing access to data supporting the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA)of 1976 and the Hazardous and Solid Waste Amendments (HSWA) of 1984.RCRAInfo replaces the data recording and reporting abilities of the Resource Conservation and Recovery Information System(RCRIS).The database inctudes selective information on sites which generate, transport,store,treat and/or dispose of hazardous waste as defined by the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA).Conditionally exempt small quantity generators (CESQGs)generate less than 100 kg of hazardous waste,or less than 1 kg of acutely hazardous waste per month.Small quantity generators (SQGs)generate between 100 kg and 1,000 kg of hazardous waste per month Large quantitygenerators generate over 1,009 kilograms (kg)of hazardous waste,or over 1 kg of acutely hazardous waste per month.Transporters are individuals or entities that move hazardous waste from the generator offsite to a facili A review of the RCRA-TSDF list,as provided by EDR,and dated 1011412005 has revealed that there is 1 RCRA-TSDF site within approximately 0.625 miles of the target property. Equal/Higher Elevation Address Dist /Dir Map ID Page BOEING RENTON 800 N 6TH ST 1/2 -1 SSW 15 35 TC1575426.1s EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 3 I I .......................-:-.:....,.,.=vr='rtv,_..,_.,..__,_SUMMARY .........._.........-.'. ....._,..._;..,.i .i .................."i....i;i',i i ..!.;=.-i I I RCRAInfo:RCRAInfo is EPA's comprehensive information system,providing access to data supporting the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA)of 1976 and the Hazardous and Solid Waste Amendments (HSWA) of 1984.RCRAfnfo replaces the data recording and reporting abilities of the Resource Conservation and Recovery Information System(RCRIS).The database includes selective information on sites which generate, transport,store,treat and/or dispose of hazardous waste as defined by the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA).Conditionally exempt small quantity generators (CESQGs)generate less than 100 kg of hazardous waste,or less than 1 kg of acutely hazardous waste per month•Small quantity generators (SQGs)generate between t00 kg and 1,000 kg of hazardous waste per month Large quantity generators generate over 1,000 kilograms (kg)of hazardous waste,or over 1 kg of acutely hazardous waste per month.Transporters are individuals or entities that move hazardous waste from the generator offsite to a facili A review of the RCRA-LQG list,as provided by EDR,and dated 10/14/2005 has revealed that there is 1 RCRA-LQG site within approximately 0.375 miles of the target property. Equal/Higher Elevation Address Dist /Dir Map ID Page SOUTHPORT LLC 1101 LAKE WASHINGTON BL 0 -1/8 NNW 2 18 RCRAInfo:RCRAInfo is EPA's comprehensive information system,providing access to data suppoddng the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA)of 1976 and the Hazardous and Solid Waste Amendments (HSWA) of 1984.RCRAInfo replaces the data recording and reporting abilities of the Resource Conservation and Recovery Information System(RCRIS).The database includes selective information on sites which generate, transport,store,treat and/or dispose of hazardous waste as defined by the Resource Conservafion and Recovery Act (RCRA).Conditionally exempt small quantity generators (CESQGs)generate less than 100 kg of hazardous waste,or less than 1 kg of acutely hazardous waste per month.Small quantity generators (SQGs) generate between 100 kg and 1,000 kg of hazardous waste per month Large quantity generators generate over 1,000 kilograms (kg)of hazardous waste,or over 1 kg of acutely hazardouswaste per month•Transporters are indivlduals or entities that move hazardous waste from the generator offsita to a facil A review of the RCRA-SQG list,as provided by EDR,and dated 10/14/2005 has revealed that there are 4 RCRA-SQG sites within approximately 0.375 miles of the target property. Equal/Higher Elevation Address Dist I DIr Map ID Page SAS FLUID POWER RENTON 919 HOUSER WAY N 1/8 -1/4SE A3 19 WHITEHALL LABORATORIES INC 915 HOUSER WAY N 1/8 -I/4SE A4 19 KENWORTH TRUCK R&D 790 GARDEN A VE N 1/4 -1/2S 6 20 BEADEX MFG CO 833 HOUSER WAY N 1/4 -1/2SE 12 32 ENG CONTROLS:A listing of sites with engineering controls in place, A review of the US ENG CONTROLS list,as provided by EDR,has revealed that there is 1 US ENG CONTROLS site within approximately 0.625 miles of the target property. Equal/Higher Elevation Address Dist I Dir Map ID BOEING RENTON 800 N 6TH ST I/2-1 SSW 15 Page 35 INST CONTROLS:A listing of sites with institutional controls in place.Institutional controls include administrative measures,such as groundwater use restrictions,construction restrictions,property use restrictions,and post remediatien care requraments intended to prevent exposure to contaminants remaining on site.Deed restdctions are generally required as part of the institutional controls. A review of the US INST CONTROL list,as provided by EDR,has revealed that there is 1 US INST TC1575426.1s EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 4 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I CONTROL site within approximately 0.625 miles of the target property. Equal/Higher Elevation Address Dist /Dir Map ID Page BOEING RENTON 800 N 6TH ST 1/2 -I SSW 15 35 RODS:Record of Decision.ROD documents mandate a permanent remedy at an NPL (Superfund)site containing technical and health information to aid the cleanup• A review of the ROD list,as provided by EDR,has revealed that there is 1 ROD site within approximately 1.125 miles of the target property. Equal/Higher Elevation Address Dist /Dir Map ID PACCAR INCORPORATED 1400 NORTH 4TH STREET 1/2 -1 S 0 Page FINDS:The Facility Index System contains both facility information and "pointers"to other sources of information that contain more detail.These include:RCRIS;Permit Compliance System (PCS); Aerometric Information Retdeval System (AIRS);FATES (FIFRA [Federal Insecticide Fungicide Rodenticide Act] and TSCA Enforcement System,FTI-S [FIFRA/TSCA Tracking System];CERCLIS;DOCKET (Enforcement Docket used to manage and track information on civil judicial enforcement cases for all environmental statutes);Federal Underground Injection Control (FURS);Federal Reporting Data System (FRDS);Surface Impoundments (SIA);TSCA Chemicals in Commerce Information System (CICS);PADS;RCRA-J (medical waste transporters/disposers);TRIS; and TSCA.The source of this database is the U.S.EPNNTIS. A review of the FINDS list,as provided by EDR,and dated 09/29/2005 has revealed that there is 1 FINDS site within approximately 0.125 miles ofthe target property. Equal/Higher Elevation Address Dist /Dir Map ID Page SOUTHPORT LLC 1101 LAKE WASHINGTON BL 0 -1/8 NNW 2 18 STATE AND LOCAL RECORDS CSCSL:The State Hazardous Waste Sites records are the states'equivalent to CERCLIS.These sites may or may not already be listed on the federal CERCLIS list.Pdodty sites planned for cleanup using state funds (state equivalent of Superfund)are identified along with sites where cleanup will be paid for by potentially responsible parties.Th data come from the Department of Ecology's Confirmed &Suspected Contaminated Sites List. A review of the CSCSL list,as provided by EDR,has revealed that there are 8 CSCSL sites within appmximataly 1.125 miles of the target property. Equal/Higher Elevation Address Dist /Dir Map ID Page PACCAR INCORPORATED 1400 NORTH 4TH STREET 1/2 -1 S 0 6 BOEING CO RENTON BLDG 421 8TH ST /PARK AVE N B 1/4 -I/2SSW B10 31 BOEING RENTON 800 N 6TH ST I/2 -1 SSW 15 35GRADYYOUNGMAN523PELLYAVEN1/2-1 SSW 16 47 Lower Elevation WALTS SERVICE CENTER CEDAR RIVER TRAIL ACTION AVIATION INC Address Dist /Dir Map ID Page 546 BURNE'F]-AVE N 1/2 -1 SSW 17 49 N RIVERSIDE DR 1/2-1 SW 18 50 840 PERIMETER RDW 1/2-1 SW 19 51 TC1575426.1s EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 5 I I •.....................EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ..................-. I Lower Elevation Address Dist /Dir Map ID Page RENTON MUNICIPAL AIRPORTFIRE 616 W PERIMETER RD 1/2 -1 SW 20 53 CSCSL NFA:The data set contains information about sites previously on the Confirmed and Suspected Contaminated Sites list that have received a No Further Action (NFA)determination.Because it is necessary to maintain historical records of sites that have been investigated and cleaned up,sites are notdeetad from the database when cleanup activities are completed.Instead a No Further Action cede is entered based upon the type of NFA determination the site received. A review of the CSCSL NFA list,as provided by EDR,and dated 07/05/2005 has revealed that there are 2 CSCSL NFA sites within approximately 0.625 miles of the target property. Equal/Higher Elevation Address Dist I Dir Map ID BOEING 800 PARK RENTON 600 PARK AVE N 1/4 -I/2SSW Bll GARDEN PLAZA/STH &PARK BLDGS PARK AVE.N./N.SIX 1/2-1 SSW C13 Page 32 33 LuST:The Leaking Underground Storage Tank Incident Reports contain an inventory of reported leaking underground storage tank incidents.The data come from the Department of Ecology's Leaking Underground Storage Tanks Site List. A review of the LUST list,as provided by EDR,and dated 07/05/2005 has revealed that there is 1 LUST site within approximately 0.625 miles of the target property. Equal Elevation Address Dist I Dir Map ID Page RENTON PLANT 800 PARKA VE N I/4 -I/2SSW B8 21 UST:The Underground Storage Tank database contains registered USTs.USTs are regulated under Subtitle I of the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA).The data come from the Department of Ecology's Statewide UST Site/Tank Report. A review of the UST list,as provided by EDR,and dated 07/11/2005 has revealed that there are 4 UST sites within approximately 0.375 miles of the target property. Equal/Higher Elevation Address SHUFFLETON SUB CONS 1101 LAKE WASH BLVD PACIFIC AGRO CO 903 HOUSER WAY NORTH PO RENTON PLANT 800 PARKAVE N BEADEXMFG CO 833 HOUSER WAY N Oist I Dir Map ID Page 0-1/8 N 1 18 1/8 -1/4SE A5 20 1/4 -1/2SSW B8 21 1/4 -1/2SE 12 32 INST CONTROL:Sites that have institutional controls. A review of the INST CONTROL list,as provided by EDR,and dated 01/10/2005 has revealed tiTat there is 1 INST CONTROL site within approximately 0.625 miles of the target property. Equal/Higher Elevation Address Dist /Dir Map ID GARDEN PLAZA PARK AVE N &N 6TH ST 1/2 -1 SSW C14 Page 34 TC1575426.1S EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 6 I I I I I 1 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I i I I I I I I I I I I I I I VCP:Sites that have entered either the Voluntary Cleanup Program or its predecessor Independent Remedial Action Program. A review of the VCP list,as provided by EDR,and dated 07/05/2005 has revealed that there is 1 VCP site within approximately 0.625 miles of the target property. Equal/Higher Elevation Address Dist /Dir Map ID GARDEN PLAZA PARK AVE N &N 6TH ST 1/2-I SSW C14 Page 34 ICR:These are remedial action repod:s Ecology has received from either the owner or operator ofthe site.These actions have been conducted without department oversight or approval and are not under anorderordecree. A review of the ICR list,as provided by EDR,and dated 12/01/2002 has revealed that there are 4 ICR sites withln approximately 0.625 miles of the target property. Equal/Higher Elevation BOEING -BLDG.4-41 BOEING FUEL FARM GARDEN PLAZA/5TH &PARK BLDGSBOEINGRENTON Address Dist I Dir Map ID Page 800 PARKAVE.N.1/4 -I/2SSW B7 20 800 PARK AVE.N.1/4 -I/2SSW B9 31 PARKAVE.N./N.SIX 1/2 -1 SSW C13 33 800 N 6TH ST 1/2 -1 SSW 15 35 TCI575426.1s EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 7 .......,:..............:.EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ......:,.•,--I I I Due to poor or inadequate address information,the following stes were not mapped: Site Name QUENDALL TERMINAL STERNOFF METALS CORPORATIONSHAMROCK BLACK RIVER CORP PARK TRACT A WALKERS RENTON SUBARU USED CARSRENTONSAND&GRAVEL RIVERVIEW KING CO -RENTON JCT LDFL PSE GRADY WAY RENTON COMPLEX PARCE BOEING RENTON RENTON TECHNICAL COLLEGE WEST SPRING LAKE BOAT RAMP CLEANUP RENTON OAKSDALE DRUMS WA DOT BRIDGE 90020 RENTON CITY SW 23RD ST DRAINAGE CHYOUNKERNISSAN KENWORTH TRUCK COMPANY 78TH AVE AND 112TH STREET.NORTH O NEXT TO 10222 148TH AvE SE MILE NO RENTON SITE LOGAN AVE RENTON MAINTENANCE FACILITY SITE PSE GRADY WAY RENTON COMPLEX PARCE RENTON BP BNSF SHAI'UCK STREET DERAILMENT RENTON CONCRETE RECYCLERS KENWORTH TRUCK COMPANY-RENTON RENTON MUNICIPAL AIRPORT CHEVRON #9 711 PACCAR INC. BOEING -RENTON FACILITY -BLDGS 4 BOEING -RENTON FACILITY -BLDG.4 BOEING -RENTON BLDG.4-75G&M INVESTMENTS/GARDEN PLAZA RENTON SHOPPING CENTER (EIGHT REPORENTONTRANSFERSTATION BNSF SHATTUCK STREET DERAILMENT Database(s) CERCLIS,Proposed NPL CSCSL,INST CONTROL CSCSL CSCSL,FINDS CSCSL,FINDS,VCPCSCSL CERC-NFRAP FINDS,VCP,INST CONTROL SPILLS SPILLS RCRA-SQG,FINDS RCRA-SQG,FINDS RCRA-SQG,FINDS RCRA-SQG,FINDS RCRA-SQG,FINDS FINDS,RCRA-LQG,TRISERNS ERNS ERNS FINDS FINDS,VCPFINDS FINDS,VCP FINDS EMI ICR ICR ICR ICR ICR ICR ICR ICR CSCSL NFA CSCSL NFA TC1575426.1S EXECUTIVE SUMMARy 8 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I •/r Target Property OVERVIEW MAP -1575426.1 s - i Sites atelevations higher than or equal to the target property Sites at elevations lower thanthetargetproperty Coal Gasification Sites r Natiohal Priority List Sites ]Landfill Sites Dept.Defense Sites I TARGET PROPERTY: ADDRESS: CITY/STATE/ZIP: LAT/LONG: Geo Engineers,Inc. ?i-, I ,- I 1 ]Indian Reserve.tions BIA =/',#Power tTansmission lines ,Oil &Gas pipelines ]t O0-year flood zone 500-year flood zone ]Federal Wetlands \ 2iltlr IProposedLowesRentonJ 800 Garden Avenue North Renton WA 98055 47.5001 /122.1995 CUSTOMER: CONTACT: INQUIRY#: DATE: Gee Engineers,Inc. Prajakta Ghatpande 1575426.1s December 15,2005 9:03 am Copyillht ©2005 EDR,Inc.iP 2O0:l GDT,Inc.RilL 07/2004 AI Rights ReielVed DETAIL MAP -1575426.1s -Gee Engineers,Inc.I I I I .I I I I I I I I I I Yr Target Property &Sits at elevations higher thanorequaltothetargetproperty •,Sites at elevations lower thanthetargetproperty 4,.Coal GasificaSon Sites ,;SensiSve Receptors [National Priority Ust Sites ]Landfill Sites []Dept.Defense Sites \\ 0 1/16T []Tndian Reservadons BIA o)Power b'ansmission 5nes Oil &Gas pipelines []f00-year Hood zone [7 500-year Hood zone []Federal Wetlands 1/9 TARGET PROPERTY: ADDRESS: CITY/STATE/ZIP: LAT/LONG:\ Proposed Lewes Renton800GardenAvenueNorthRentonWA98055 47.5001 /122.1995 I CUSTOMER: CONTACT: INQUIRY#: DATE: Gee Engineers,Inc.Prajakta Ghatpande1575426.1sDecember15,2005 9:04 am C pyTIght 2005 EOR,Ir @ 2904 GDT,Ilr Ret 07/2004.AN ghts Reserved. 1/4MSez I =I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I Database FEDERAL RECORDS Search Target Distance Property (Miles)<1/8 1/8 -1/4 NPL 1.125 0 0 Proposed NPL 1.125 0 0 Delisted NPL 1.125 0 0 NPL Liens 0.125 0 NR CERCLIS 0.625 0 0 CERC-NFRAP 0.625 0 0 CORRACTS 1.125 0 0 RCRA TSD 0.625 0 0 RCRA Lg.Quan.Gen.0.375 1 0 RCRA Sm.Quan.Gen.0.375 0 2ERNS0.125 0 NR HMIRS 0,125 0 NR US ENG CONTROLS 0.625 0 0 US INST CONTROL 0,625 0 0 DOD 1.125 0 0 FUDS 1.125 0 0 US BROWNFIELDS 0.625 0 0 CONSENT 1.125 0 0 ROD 1.125 0 0 UMTRA 0.625 0 0 ODI 0.625 0 0 TRIS 0.125 0 NR TSCA 0.125 0 NR FTTS 0.125 0 NR SSTS 0.125 0 NR PADS 0.125 0 NR MLTS 0,125 0 NR MINES 0.375 0 0 FINDS 0.125 1 NR RAATS 0.125 0 NR STATE AND LOCAL RECORDS CSCSL 1.125 0 0 HSL 1.125 0 0 CSCSL NFA 0.625 0 0 State Landfill 0.625 0 0 LUST 0.625 0 0 UST 0.375 1 1 AST 0.375 0 0 SPILLS 0.125 0 NR INST CONTROL 0.625 0 0 VCP 0.625 0 0 ICR 0.625 0 0 DRYCLEANERS 0.375 0 0 CDL 0.125 0 NR WA Emissions 0.125 0 NR TRIBAL RECORDS INDIAN RESERV 1,125 0 0 Total 1/4 -1/2 1/2-1 >1 PIoed 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 O 0 NR NR NR 0 0 1 NR 1 0 1 NR 1 0 1 0 1 0 1 NR 1 0 NR NR 1 2 NR NR 4 NR NR NR 0 NR NR NR 0 0 1 NR 1 0 1 NR 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 NR 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 NR 0 0 0 NR 0 NR NR NR 0 NR NR NR 0 NR NR NR 0 NR NR NR 0 NR NR NR 0 NR •NR NR 0 0 NR NR 0 NR NR NR 1 NR NR NR 0 1 7 0 8 0 0 0 0 1 1 NR 2 0 0 NR 0 1 O NR 1 2 NR NR 4 0 NR NR 0 NR NR NR 0 0 2 NR 2 0 1 NR 1 2 2 NR 4 0 NR NR 0 NR NR.NR 0 NR NR NR 0 0 O 0 0 TC1575426.1s Page4 I I Target Database Property INDIAN LUST INDIAN UST EDR PROPRIETARY RECORDS Search Distance Total (Miles)<1/8 1/8 -1/4 1/4 -1/2 1/2 -1 >1 Plotted 0.625 0 0 0 0 NR 0 0.375 0 0 0 NR NR 0 COAL GAS 1.125 0 0 0 0 0 0 NOTES: TP =Target Property NR =Not Requested at this Search Distance Sites may be listed in more than one database TC1575426.1s Page5 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I Map ID Direction Distance Distance (ft.) Elevation Site NPL Region South 1/2-1 3935 ft. j+j ''MA E INDINGS ":;::: Database(s) EDR IO Number EPA ID Number Coal Gas Site Search:No site was found in a search of Real Propert-j Scan's ENVIROHAZ database. PACCAR INCORPORATED 1400 NORTH 4TH STREET RENTON,WA 98055 CERCLIS Classification Data: Federal Facility:Not a Federal Facility Non NPL Status:Not reported NPL Status:Currently on the Final NPL CERCLIS Assessment History: Assessment: Assessment: Assessment: Assessment: Assessment: Assessment: Assessment: Assessment: Assessment: Assessment: Assessment: Assessment: Assessment: Assessment: AssessmeRh Assessment: CERCLIS Site Status: Not reported DISCOVERY PRELIMINARY ASSESSMENT SITE INSPECTION HRS PACKAGE PROPOSAL TO NPL RI/FS NEGOTIATIONS STATE CONSENT DECREE FINAL LISTING ON NPL REMOVAL ASSESSMENT COMBINED RI/FS RECORD OF DECISION RD/RA NEGOTIATIONS STATE CONSENT DECREE REMOVAL ASSESSMENT REMEDIAL ACTION REMEDIAL DESIGN CERCLIS Alias Name(s): PACCAR PACIFIC CAR &FOUNDRY CO PACIFIC CAR &FOUNDRY CO PACIFIC CAR &FOUNDRY CO. NPL: EPA ID: Region: Federal: Final Date: NPL SUMMARY: CERCLIS RCRA-SQG CSCSL FINDS NPL ROD INST CONTROL Completed:0610511981 Completed:04/24/1985 Completed:0911711986 Completed:04/02/1987 Completed:0612411988 Completed:1110711988 Completed:1119711988 Completed:92/2111990 Completed:0911111990 Completed:0910611991 Completed:0910611991 Completed:1110811991 Completed:11/08/1991 Completed:12/02/1992 Completed:08/0511996 Completed:08/0511996 Summary : 1000251921 WAD009249210 WAD099249210 10 Genel 02/21/1990 Conditions at proposal June 24,1998):Pacific Car Foundry Co.manufactures trucks,winches,military equipment,railroad cars,and anodes on 97 acres in an industrial area of Renton,King County,Washington.The facility operated dudng 1907 2 4 and from 1934 to the present.The company is a division of PACCAR,Inc.An inactive company landfill occupies the northwest quarter of the property.Until 1964,the facility deposited waste matadals,including foundry sand,wood, metal,paints, solvents,and oils,in a marshy area underlain by peat and clay.The wastes are estimated to have been buried up to 7 feet below the surface.Sand and gravel have been used to cover the abandoned landfifl.ln February 1986,PACCAR,Inc., detected I TC1575426.1S Page6 Map ID Direction Distance Distance (ft.) Elevation Site .....,:..::':'-"MAR FINDINGS ."--...-""= EDR ID Number Database(s)EPA ID Number PACCAR INCORPORATED (Continued) NPL Contaminant: NPL Status: Substance Id: Case Num: Substance : Pathway : GW Scoring : SW Scodng : Air Scodng: Soil Scering: DC Scoring: FE Scedng: NPL Status: Substance Id: Case Num: Substance : Pathway : GW Scodng : SW Scaring : Air Scodng: SoU Scodog: DC Scodng: FE Scoring: NPL Status: Substance Id: Case Num: Substance : Pathway : GW Scodng : SW Scoring : Air Scoring: Soil Scoring: DC Scoring: FE Scoring: NPL Status: Substance Id: Case Num: Substance : 1000251921 ead,mercury,arsenic,cadmium,and chromium in on site soil and in shallow ground water.Renton has wells in an aquifer connected to the shallow contaminated aquifer.An estimated 37,200 people obtain drinking water from municipal wellswithin 3 miles ofthe site.In November 1987,-PACCAR,Inc.,removed some contaminated soil containing hydrocarbons and lead and transported it to a ha ardous waste taci]ityregulated under Subtitle C of the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act.A ditch on the site drains [nta the Cedar River and John s Creek.The Cedar River flows into Lake Washington,which is within 3 miles downstream of the site and is used for recreational activities.States Febar 21,1990):In August 1988,under a Consent D ecree with the Washington Department of Ecology,PACCAR began a remedial investigation/feasibility study to determine the type and extent of contamination at the site and identify altamatives for remedial action,The work is scheduled to be comple ted in early 1990. Final A011 7446-41-7 BERYLLIUM AND COMPOUNDS,NOS (BE) NOT INDICATED Not reported Not reported Not reported Not reported Not reported Not reported Final A038 74402 NICKEL AND COMPOUNDS,NOS (NI) NOT INDICATED Not reported Not reported Not reported Not reported Not reported Not reported Einal A046 1336-36-3 POLYCHLORINATED B[PHENYLS,NOS NOT INDICATED Not reported Not reported Not reported Not reported Not reported Not reported Final A049 7446-22-4 SILVER AND COMPOUNDS,NOS (AG) TC1575426.Is Page7 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I Map ID Direction Distance Distance (ft.) Elevation Site LI .................................,........I PACCAR INCORPORATED (Continued) Pathway :NOT INDICATED GW Scodng :Not reported SW Scedng :Not reported Air Scodng:Not reported Soil Scoring:Not reported DC Scodng:Not reported FE Scoring:Not reported NPL Status:Final Substance Id:C151 Case Num:7439-89-6 Substance :IRON AND COMPOUNDS,NOS (FE) Pathway :NOT iNDICATED GW Scodng :Not reported SW Scodng :Not reported Air Scodng:Not reported Soil Scoring:Not reported DC Scodng:Not reported FE Scoring:Not reported NPL Status:Final Substance Id:C156 Case Num:7429-90-5 Substance ;ALUMINUM AND COMPOUNDS,NOS (AL) Pathway :NOT INDICATED GW Scodng :Not reported SW Scodng :Not reported Air Scoring:Not reported Soil Scodng:Not reported DC Scodng:Not reported FE Scodng:Not reported NPL Status:Final Substance Id:C178 Case Num:7440-50-8 Substance :COPPER AND COMPOUNDS,NOS (CU) Pathway :NOT INDICATED GW Scodng :Not reported SW Scodng :Not reported Air Scoring:Not reported Soil Scoring:Not reported DC Scoring:Not reported FE Scodng:Not reported NPL Status:Final Substance Id:C212 Case Num:109-95-2 Substance :PHENOLIC COMPOUNDS,NOS Pathway :NOT INDICATED GW Scoring :Not reported SW Scoring :Not reported Air Scodng:Not reported Soil Scodng:Not reported DC Scoring:Not reported FE Scoring:Not reported NPL Status:Final Substance Id:C247 Case Num:7440-66-6 Substance :ZINC AND COMPOUNDS,NOS (ZN) EDR ID Number Database(s)EPA ID Number 1000251921 TCt 575426.1s Page8 I Map ID Direction Distance Distance (ft.) Elevation Site I PACCAR INCORPORATED (Continued) Pathway : GW Scoring : SW Scodng : Air Scodng: Soil Scodng: DC Scodng: FE Scodng: NPL Status: Substance Id: Case Num: Substance : Pathway : GW Scodng : SW Scodng : Air Scodng: Soil Scodng: DC Scodng: FE Scodng: NPL Status: Substance Id: Case Num: Substance : Pathway : GW Scodng : SW Scodng ; Air Scodng: Soil Scodng: DC Scodng: FE Scodng: NPL Status: Substance Id: Case Num: Substance : Pathway : GW Scodng : SW Scodng : Air Scoring: Soil Scodng: DC Scodng: FE Scodng: NPL Status: Substance ld: Case Num; Substance : Pathway : GW Scodng : SW Scodng : Air Scodng: Soil Scodng: DC Scoring: FE Scoring: NPL Status: Substance Id: Case Num: Substance : NOT INDICATED Not reported Not reported Not reported Not reported Not reported Not reported Final C460 7430.97-6 MERCURY NOT INDICATED Not reported Not reported Not reported Not reported Not reported Not reported Final W002 Not reported VOLATILE ORGANICS,NOS NOT INDICATED Not reported Not reported Not reported Not reported Not reported Not reported Final W012 Not reported PESTICIDES,NOS NOT INDICATED Not reported Not reported Not reported Not reported Notreported Not reported Final W031 130498-29-2 POLYNUCLEAR AROMATIC HYDROCARBONS NOT INDICATED Not reported Not reported Not reported Not reported Not reported Not reported Final A0O5 7440-38-2 ARSENIC AND COMPOUNDS,NOS (AS) EDR ID Number Database(s)EPA IO Number 1000251921 TC1575426.1s Page9 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I Map ID Direction Distance Distance (ft.) Elevation Site PACCAR INCORPORATED (Continued) Pathway : GW Scoring : SW Scodng : Air Scoring: Soil Scoring: DC Scoring: FE Scoring: NPL Status: Substance id: Case Num: Substance : Pathway : GW Scodng : SW Scoring : Air Scoring: Soil Scoring: DC Scodng: FE Scoring: NPL Status: Substance Id: Case Num: Substance : Pathway : GW Scoring : SW Scoring : Air Sconng: Soil Scoring: DC Scoring: FE Scoring: NPL Status: Substance Id: Case Num: Substance : Pathway : GW Scoring : SW Scoring : Air Scoring: Soil Scoring: DC Scoring: FE Scoring: NPL Status: Substance Id: Case Num: Substance : Pathway : GW Scoring : SW Scoring : Air Scoring: Soil Scoring: DC Scoring: FE Scoring: NPL Status: Substance Id: Case Num: Substance : The Ground water migration route,or pathway, Observed Release &Toxicity Not reported Not reported Not reported Not reported Not reported Final A006 7440-39-3 BARIUM AND COMPOUNDS,NOS (BA} The Ground watermigration route,or pathway. Toxicity Not reported Not reported Not reported Not reported Not reported Final A020 7440-47-3 CHROMIUM AND COMPOUNDS,NOS (CR) The Ground water migration route,or pathway. Observed Release &Toxicity Not reported Not reported Not reported Not reported Not reported Final D0O6 7440-43-9 CADMIUM (CD) The Ground water migration route,or pathway. Toxicity Not reported Not reported Not reported Not reported Not reported Final D008 7439-92-1 LEAD (PB) The Ground water migration route,or pathway. Observed Release &Toxicity Not reported Not reported Not reported Not reported Not reported Final A006 7440-39-3 BARIUM AND COMPOUNDS,NOS (BA) Database(s) EDR ID Number EPA ID Number 1000251921 TC1575426.1s Page 10 I Map ID Direction Distance Distance (ft.) Elevation Site PACCAR INCORPORATED (Continued) Pathway : GW Scoring : SW Scoring : Air Scoring: Soil Scoring: DC Scoring: FE Scoring: NPL Status: Substance Id: Case Nurn: Substance : Pathway : GW Scoring : SW Scoring : Air Scoring: Soil Scoring: DC Scoring: FE Scoring: NPL Status: Substance Id: Case Num: Substance : pathway : GW Scoring : SW Scoring : Air Scoring: Soil Scoring: DC Scoring: FE Scoring: NPL Status: Substance Id: Case Num: Substance : Pathway : GW Scoring : SW Scoring : Air Scoring: Soil Scoring: DC Scoring: FE Scoring: NPL Status: Substance Id: Case Num: Substance : Pathway : GW Scoring : SW Scoring : Air Scoring: Soil Scoring: DC Scoring: FE Scoring: NPL Site: CERCLIS Id: Site City: Site State: SW Not reported Toxicity Not reported Not reported Not reported Not reported Final A020 7440-47-3 CHROMIUM AND COMPOUNDS,NOS (CR) SW Not reported Todcty Not reported Not reported Not reported Not reported Final DO04 7440-38-2 ARSENIC SW Not reported Toxicity Not reported Not reported Not reported Not reported Final D006 7440-43-9 CADMIUM (CD) SW Not reported Toxicity Not reported Not reported Not reported Not reported Final D008 7439-92-1 LEAD (PB) SW Not reported Toxicity Not reported Not reported Not reported Not reported WAD009249210 RENTON WA EDR ID Number Database(s)EPA ID Number 1000251921 TC1575426.1s Page 11 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I Map IG Direction Distance Distance (ft.) Elevation Site / Database(s) EDR ID Number EPA ID Number PACCAR INCORPORATED (Continued) NPL Status: Status Date: Federal Site: CERCLIS Id: Site City: Site State: NPL Status: Status Date: Federal Site: NPL Char: NPL Status: Category Descrip0on: Category Value: NPL Status: Category Description: Category Value: NPL Status: Category Descrip0on: Category Value: NPL Status; Category Description: Category Value: NPL Status: Category Description: Category Value: NPL Status: Category Descdption: Category Value: NPL Status: Category Description: Category Value: NPL Status: Category Description: Category Value: NPL Status: Category Description: Category Value: NPL Status: Category Description: Category Value: NPL Status: Category Description: Category Value: NPL Status: Category Description: Category Vatue: NPL Status: Category Description: Category Value: Currentl 06124/88 No WAD009249210 RENTON WA Currentl 02/21/90 No Final DEPTH TO AQUIFER 75 FTBGS Final DISTANCE TO THE NEAREST POPULATION i 0 Final OBSERVED RELEASE-Ground Water Not reported Final OTHER GROUND WATER USE-Irrigation Not reported Final PHYSICAL STATE-Liquid Not reported Final PHYSICAL STATE-Sludge Not reported Final PHYSICAL STATE-Solid Not reported Final SITE ACTIVITY WASTE SOURCE-Manufacturing Not reported Final SITE ACTIVITY WASTE SOURCE-Manutacturing Fabricated Metals Not reported Final SITE ACTIVITY WASTE SOURCE-Manufacturing Other/Industrial Not reported Final SURFACE WATER ADJACENT TO SITE-Lake Not reported Final SURFACE WATER ADJACENT TO SITE-River Not reported Final SURFACE WATER ADJACENT TO SITE-Stream Not reported 1000251921 TC1575426.1s Page 12 Map ID Direction Distance Distance (ft.) Elevation Site ..............,MAF FIND NGS ........- Database(s} EDR ID Number EPA ID Number PACCAR INCORPORATED (Continued)1000251921 NPL SITE STATUS: NPL Status:Final proposed Date:06/24/1988 Final Date:02/2111990 Deleted Date:Not reported ROD: Full-text of USEPA Record of Decision(s)is avaitable from EDR. RCRAInfo: Owner:PACCAR INC (425)455-7400 EPA ID:WAD009249210 Contact:Not reported Classification:Small Quantity Generator TSDF Acitvi5es:Not reported Violation Status:Violations exist Regulation Violated: Area of violaiton: Date Violation Determined: Actual Dote Achieved Compliance: Enforcement Action: Enforcement Action Date: Penalty Type: Not reported GENERATOR-ALL REQUIREMENTS (OVERSIGHT) 04/17/1984 08/28/1984 WRITTEN INFORMAL 0710811984 Not reported There are 1 violation record(s)reported at this site: Date of Evaluation .Area ofviolation liance Compliance Evaluation Inspection GENERATOR-ALL REQUIREMENTS (OVERSIGHT)19840828 FINDS: Other pertinent Environmental Activity Identified at Site: COMPREHENSIVE ENVIRONMENTAL RESPONSE,COMPENSATION AND INFORMATION SYSTEM RATIONAL COMPLIANCE DATABASE SYSTEM RESOURCE CONSERVATION AND RECOVERY ACT INFORMATION SYSTEM TOXIC CHEMICAL RELEASE INVENTORY SYSTEM WASHINGTON-DEPARTMENT OF ECOLOGY FACILITY/SITE IDENTIFICATION SYSTEM SHWS: Facility ID:2065 MTBE Code:Not reported Prog plan code :2 UXO Code :Not reported Lat/Long :47 /122 Responsible Unit:Northwest Region Eco]ogy Site Status relative to the MTCA cleanup process: Construction Completed,Operation &Maintenance Underway Independent Site Status -those sites undergoing an independent cleanup: Not reported WARM Bin Number indicates the outcome of the Washington Ranking Model (WARM): Affected Media Status:C (Confirmed)o The presence of hazardous substances above MTCA ceanup levels has been confirmed by laberata analysis (orfield determination in the case of petroleum contamination) Affected Media :Ground Water Arsenic Code:Not reported BaselNeutrallAcid Organics:Not reported TC1575426.1s Page13 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I ! Map ID Direction Distance Distance (ft.) Elevation Site i ,,......::z,M FiN DINGS "-32 Database(s) EDR ID Number EPA ID Number PACCAR INCORPORATED (Continued) Halogenatad Organic Compounds: "EPA Priodty Poltutants -Metals and Cyanide: Metals o Other non-pdodty pollutant medals: Polychlodnated biPhenyls (PCBs): Pesticides: Petroleum Products: Phenolic Compounds: Non-Halogenated Solvents: Dioxin: PolynuclearAromatic Hydrocarbons (PAH): Reactive Wastes: Corrosive Wastes: Radioactive Wastes: Asbestos: Conventional Contaminants,Organic: Conventional Contaminants,Inorganic: Method Code : Lat/Long :47"29'59"/122"12"4" Confirmed above MTCA cleanup levels Confirmed above MTCA cleanup levels Not reported Not reported Not reported Not reported Not reported Not reported Not reported Not reported Not reported Not reported Not reported Not reported Not reported Not reported 19 1000251921 Facility ID:2065 MTBE Code:Not reported Prog plan code :2 UXO Code :Not reported LaULong :47 /122 Responsible Unit:Northwest Region Ecology Site Status relative to the MTCA cleanup process: Constction Completed,Operation &Maintenance Underway Independent Site Status -those sites undergoing an independent cleanup: Not reported WARM Bin Number indicates the outcome of e Washington Ranking Model (WARM): Affected Media Status:C (Confirmed)-The presence of hazardous substances above MTCA cleanup levels has been confirmed by laboratory analysis (or field determination in te case of petroleum contamination) Affected Media :Soil Arsenic Code:Not reported Base/Neutral/Acid Organics: Halogenated Organic Compounds: EPA Pdodty Pollutants -Metals and Cyanide: Metals -Other non-pdodty pollutant medals: Polychtudnatad biPhenyls (PCBs): pesticides: •Petrcleum Products: Phenolic Compounds: Non-Halogenatad Solvents: Dioxin: Polynuc]ear Aromatic Hydrocarbons (PAH): Reactive Wastes: Corrosive Wastes: Radioactive Wastes: Asbestos: Conventional Contaminants,Organic: Conventional Contaminants,Inorganic: Method Code : Lat/Long :47"29"59"/122"12"4" WA INSTUTIONAL CONTROL: Facility Site Id 2065 Nfa Code : Not reported Confirmed above MI:CA cleanup levels Confirmed above MTCA cleanup levels Confirmed above MTCA cleanup levels Confirmed above MTCA cleanup levels Not reported Confirmed above MTCA cleanup levels Confirmed above MTCA cleanup levels Confirmed above MTCA cleanup levels Not reported Confirmed above MTCA cleanup levels Not reported Not reported Not reported Not reported Not reported Confirmed above MTCA cleanup levels 19 Not reported TC1575426.1s Page 14 I MaplD Direction Distance Distance (ft.) Elevation Site -r PACCAR INCORPORATED (Continued) Nfa Date : Decision Document Id : Document Type : Filing Num (county): Filing Date : Inst Control Doc Id : IC Document Type : Status Of IC Doc Type : County Filing #For Individual IC Doc : Filing Data Of Individual IC Doc : Status Date : IC Category Id : IC Category : Comments: NFA Oesc : IC Doc Type : IC Doc Status : IC Category Desc : Not reported 295 Consent Decree (CD) 88-2-22080-8 111111988 00:06:00 1 Restrictive Covenant Acte Not reported Not reported Not reported 533 Ground Water Restriction Land and gw use restrictions:indusal use and no wells for the extzaction of potable water. Land and gw use restdctfons:industrial use and no welta for the extraction of potable water. Land and gw use restrictions:industhal use and no wells for the extraction of potable water. Lend and ground water use restrictions:industrial use and no wails for the extraction of potable water. Land and ground water use restrictions:industrial use and no wells for the extraction ofpotable water. Land and ground water use restdctions:indusal use and no wells for the extraction of potable water, Not reported Consent Decree (CD) Active Ground Water Restriction Facility Site Id : Nfa Code : Nfa Date : Decision Document Id : Document Type : Filing Num (county): Firing Date : Inst Control Doc Id : IC Document Type : Status Of IC Doc Type : County Filing #For Individual IC Doc : Filing Date Of Individual IC Doc : Status Date : IC Category ld : IC Category : Comments: 2O65 Not reported Not reported 295 Consent Decree (CD) 88-2-22080-8 11/1/1988 O0:00:00 1 Restrictive Covenant Active Not reported Not reported Not reported 534 Property Use Restriction Land and gw use restrictions:industrial use and no wells for the exaction of potable water. Land and gw use restrictions:industdal use and no wells for the extraction of potable water. Land and gw use restrictions:industrial use and no wetis for the extraction of potable water, Land and ground wateruse restrictions:indusal use and no wells for the extraction of potable water. Land and ground water use restrictions:industrta[use and no wells for the exlaetion of potable water. Land and ground water use restrictions:industrial use and no wells for the extraction of potable water. EDR ID Number Database(s)EPAID Number 1000251921 TC1575426.1s Page 15 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I Map ID Direction Distance Distance (ft.) Elevation Site PACCAR INCORPORATED (Continued) NFA Desc : IC Dee Type : IC Doc Status : IC Category Desc : Not reposed Consent Decree (CD) Active Property Use Restriction Facility Site Id : Nfa Code : Nfa Date : Decision Document ]d : Document Type : Filing Num (county): Filing Date : Inst Control Dec Id : IC Document Type : Status Of IC Doc Type : County Filing #For Individual IC Doc : Filing Date Of Individual IC Doc : Status Date : IC Category Id : IC Category : Comments: NFA Desc: IC DocType: IC Doc Status: ICCagory Oesc: 2O65 Not reported Not reported 295 Consent Decree (CD) 88-2-22080-8 11/1/1988 O0:00:O0 1 Restrictive Covenant Active Not reported Not reported Not reported 535 Physical measure Land and gw use restrictions:industrial use and no wells for the extraction of potable water. Land and gw use resthctions:inriustda]use and no wells for the extraction of potable water. Land and gw use restdc6ons:industrial use and no wells for the extraction of potable water: Land and ground water use restdctions:industrial use and no wells for the extraction of potable water, Land and ground wateruse restrictions:industrial use and no wells for the extraction of potable water. Land and ground wateruse restrictions:industdal use and no wel]s for the extraction of potable water. Not reported Consent Decree (CD) Active Physical Measure Facility Site Id :2065 Nta Code :Not reported Nta Date :Not reported Decision Document Id :296 Document Type :Consent Decree (CD) Filing Num (county):91-2-25053-7 Filing Date :11/1/1991 00:00:00 Inst Control Doc Id :1 IC Document Type :Restrictive Covenant Status Of IC Doc Type :Active County Filing #For Individual IC Doc :Not reported F[]ing Date Of Individual IC Doc :Not reported Status Date :Not reported IC Category Id :536 IC Catego :Ground Water Restdction Comments:Land and gw use restrictions:industrial use and no wells for the extraction of potable water. Land and gw use restrictions:industdal use and no wells for the extraction of potable water. Land and gw use restrictions:industrial use and no wells for the EDR ID Number Database(s)EPA ID Number 1000251921 TC1575426.1s Page 16 I Map ID Direction Distance Distance (ft.) Eleva6on Site h I PACCAR iNCORPORATED (Continued) extraction of potable water. Land and ground water use restrictions:industriat use and no wells for the extraction of potable water. Land and ground water use restnc6ons:industrial use and no wells for the extraction of potable water. Land and ground water use restrictions:industrial use and no wens for the extraction of potable water. NFA Desc :Not reported IC Doc Type :Consent Decree (CD) IC Ooc Status :Ac6ve IC Category Desc :Ground Water Restriction Facility Site Id : Nfa Code : Nfa Date : Decision Document Id : Document Type : Filing Num (county): Filing Date : Inst Control Doc Id : IC Document Type : Status Of IC Doc Type : County Filing #For Individual IC Doc : Filing Date Of Individual IC Doc : Status Date : IC Category Id : IC Category : Comments: NFA Desc : [C Doc Type : IC Doc Status : IC Category Desc : 2065 Not reported Not reported 296 Consent Decree (CD) 91-2-25053-7 111111991 00:00:06 1 Resctive Covenant Active Not reported Not reported Not reported 537 Physical measure Land and gw use restrictions;industrial use and no wells for the extraction of potable water. Land and gw use restrictions:indusbial use and no wefts for the extrac6on of potable water, Land and gw use restrictions:industrial use and no wetis for the extraction of potable water. Land and ground water use restdcgons:industrial use and no wells for the extraction of potable water. Land and ground water use restrictions:industrial use and no wells for the extraction of potable water. Land and ground water use restrictions:industrial use and no wells for the extraction of potable water. Not reported Consent Dect-ee (CD) Active Physical Measure Facility Site Id :2065 • Nfa Code :Not reported Nfa Date :Not reported Decision Document Id :296 Document Type :Consent Decree (CD) Filing Num (county):91-2-25053-7 Filing Date :11/1/1991 O0:00:00 Inst Control Doc Id :1 IC Document Type :Resve Covenant Status Of IC Doc Type :Active County Filing #For Individual IC Dec :Not reported Fi[ing Date Of individual IC Doc :Not reported Status Date :Not reported EDR ID Number Database(s)EPA ID Number 1000251921 TC1575426.1s Page17 I I i I I i ! I I I ! I I I I I I I ! I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I Map IO Direction Distance Distance (ft.) Elevation Site 1 North <118 484 ft. Relative: Higher Actual: 51 ft. 2 NNW <118 626 ft. Relative: Equal Actual: 36 ft. PACCAR INCORPORATED (Continued) IC Category Id :538 IC Category :Property Use Restriction Comments:Land and gw use resections:thdustdal use and no wells for the extraction of potable water. Land and gw use restdctions:industrial use and no wells for tile extraction of potable water. Land and gw use restrictions:industrial use and no wells for the extraction of potable water. Land and ground water use restrictions:industdal use and no wells for the extraction of potable water. Land and ground water use restrictions:industrial use and no wells for the extraction of potable water. Land and ground water use restdctions:industrial use and no wells for the extraction of potable water. NFA Desc :Not reported IC Doc Type :Consent Decree (CD) IC Doc Status :Active IC Category Desc :Property Use Resthction SHUFFLETON SUB CONS 1101 LAKE WASH BLVD RENTON,WA 98055 UST: Facil ID:8530 Site ID:82611157 Install Date:05101/78 Capacity:1,101 TO 2.000 GALLONS Status:Removed Tank Name:104 Substance:UNLEADED GASOLINE Compartment #:t Ecology Region:North Westem SOUTHPORT LLC 1101 LAKE WASHINGTON BLVD N SO RENTON,WA 98055 RCRAInfo: Owner:SOUTHPORT LLC (425)688-3085 EPA ID:WAHO00017756 Contact:MIKE DILORETO (425)688-3085 Classification:Large Quantity Generator TSDF Activities:Not reported Database(s) EDR IO Number EPAID Number 1000251921 UST U001125498 NIA FINDS 1005445503 RCRA-LQG WAHO00017756 TC1575426.1s Page18 Map ID Direction Distance Distance (ft.) Elevation Site A3 SE 118-114 1085 ft. Relative: Higher Actual: 61 ft. A4 SE 1/8-114 1119 ft. Relative: Higher Actual: 59 ft. li =.:..-..,,:M/P FINDINGS.:-,:,-.,-.:. EDR ID Number Database(s)EPAID Number SOUTHPORT LLC (Continued) Violation Status:No violations found 1.005445503 FINDS: Other Penent Environmental Activity Identified at Site: RESOURCE CONSERVATION AND RECOVERY ACT INFORMATION SYSTEM WASHINGTON-DEPARTMENT OF ECOLOGY FACILITY/SITE IDENTIFICATION SYSTEM SAS FLUID POWER RENTON 019 HOUSER WAY N RENTON,WA 98055 Site 1 of 3 In cluster A RCRAInfo: Owner:SAS FLUID POWER RENTON (360)805337 EPA ID:WAD070970231 Contact:Not reported Classification:Small Quantity Generator TSDF Activities:Not reported Violation Status:No violations found RCRA-SQG FINDS 1000114273 WAD070970231 IINDS: Other Pertinent Environmental Activity Identified at Site: RESOURCE CONSERVATION AND RECOVERY ACT INFORMATION SYSTEM WASHiNGTON-DEPARTMENT OF ECOLOGY FACILITYISITE IDENTIFICATION SYSTEM WHITEHALL LABORATORIES INC 015 HOUSER WAY N RENTON,WA 98055 Site 2 of 3 in cluster A RCRAInfo: Owner:WHITEHALL LABORATORIES INC EPA ID:WAD988472528 Contact:STEVE HIRCKO (425)255-6330 Classification:Small Quantity Generator TSDF Activities:Not reported Violation Status:No violations found RCRA-SQG 1000885303 FINDS WAD988472528 FINDS: Other Pertinent Environmental Activity IdenSf;ed at Site: RESOURCE CONSERVATION AND RECOVERY ACT INFORMATION SYSTEM WASHINGTON-DEPARTMENT OF ECOLOGY FACILITY/SITE IDENTIFICATION SYSTEM TC1575426.1s Page 19 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I Map ID Direction Distance Distance (ft.) Elevation Site A5 SE 118-1/4 1224 ft. Relative: Higher Actual: 60 ft. 6 South 1/4-1/2 1680 ft. Relative: Higher Actual: 42 ft. B7 SSW 1/4-112 1758 ft. Relative: Higher Actual: 38ft. II Database(s) PACIFIC AGRO CO 903 HOUSER WAY NORTH PO BOX 326 RENTON,WA 98057 Site 3 of 3 in cluster A UST: Facility ID:2037 Site ID;18145975 Install Date:12/31/64 Capacity:Not reported Status:Removed Tank Name:1 Substance:UNLEADED GASOLINE Compartment #:1 Ecology Region:North Western KENWORTH TRUCK R&D 790 GARDEN AVE N RENTON,WA 98055 RCRAInfo: Owner:PACCAR INC (425)455-7400 EPA ID:WAD988488326 Contact:Not repoded Classification:Condi0onaUy Exempt Small Quantity Generator • TSDF Ac0vities:Not reported Violation Status:No violations found FINDS: Other pertinent Environmental Activity Identified at Site: RESOURCE CONSERVATION AND RECOVERY ACT INFORMATION SYSTEM WASHINGTON-DEPARTMENT OF ECOLOGY FACILITY/SITE IDENTIFICATION SYSTEM BOEING -BLDG.4-41 800 PARK AVE.N. RENTON,WA 98055 Site 1 of 5 in cluster B WA ICR: Date Ecology Received Report: Contaminants Found at Site: Media Contaminated: Cause of Contaminagon: Region: Type of Report Ecology Received: Site Register Issue: County Code: Contact: Report Title: Date Ecology Received Report: Contaminants Found at Site: Media Contaminated: Cause of Contamination: 09/13/1993 Petroleum products Groundwater,Soil Tank North Western Intedm cleanup report 93-17 17.00000 Not reported Not reported 08/03/1992 Petroleum products Soil Tank EDR [D Number EPA ID Number UST U003026208 NIA RCRA-SQG 1004794075 FINDS WAD988488326 ICR $104486098 NIA TC1575426.1s Pege 20 I Map ID Direction Distance Distance (ft.) Elevation Site B8 SSW 1/4-112 1758 ft. Relative: Higher Actual: 38 ft. BOEING -BLDG.4-41 (Continued) Region: Type of Report Ecology Recohted: Site Register Issue: County Code: Contact: Report 13tie: North Westem Interim cleanup report 92-36 17.00000 Not reported Not reported RENTON PLANT 800 PARK AVE N RENTON,WA 98055 Site 2 of 5 in cluster B LUST: Facility ID:10421 Ecology Region:NWRO Facility Status:Cleanup Started Release ID:3659 Release Notification Data:7120119920:00 Release Status Date:6/1/1995 0:00 AItemata Name:BOEING RENTON 10-52 BUILDING Lat/Lon:47.492612 /122.203563 Affected Media:Soi[ FS ID:64745478 Facility ID:10421 Ecology Region:hSNRO Facility Status:Cleanup Started Release ID:5405 Release Notification Date:6121119940:00 Release Status Date:6/1/1995 0:00 Alternate Name:BOEING RENTON FUEL FARM Lat/Lon:47.492612 /122.203563 Affected Media:Ground Water FS ID:64745478 Facility ID:10421 Ecology Region:NWRO Facility Status:Cleanup Started Release ID:5405 Release Notification Date:6/2111994 0:00 Release Status Date:6/111995 0:00 Alternate Name:BOEING RENTON FUEL FARM LatJLon:47.492612 /122.203563 Affected Media:Soil FS ID:64745478 UST: Facility ID:10421 Site ID:64745478 Install Date:12/31/80 Capacity:111 to 1.100 Gallons Status:Removed Tank Name:RE-03 Substance:HAZARDOUS SUBSTANCE Compartment #:1 Ecology Region:North Western Database(s) EDR ID Number EPA ID Number $104486098 LUST U003025358 UST NIA TC1575426.1s Page 21 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I Map ID Direction Distance Distance (ft.) Elevation Site i..........";....."'.i. RENTON PLANT (Continued) Facility ID:10421 Site ID:64745478 InstaLl Date:12/31/80 Capacity:111 to 1,100 Gallons Status:Removed Tank Name:RE-07 Substance:HAZARDOUS SUBSTANCE Compartment #:1 Ecology Region:North Western Facility ID:10421 Site ID:64745478 Install Date:12/31/80 Capacity:111 to 1,100 Gallons Status:Removed Tank Name:RE-08 Substance:HAZARDOUS SUBSTANCE Compartment #:1 Ecology Region:North Western Facility ID:10421 Site ID:64745478 Install Date:12/31/80 Capacity:111 to 1,100 Gallons Status:Removed Tank Name:RE-16 Substance:HAZARDOUS SUBSTANCE Comparfent #:1 Ecology Region:North Western Facility ID:10421 Site ID:64745478 Install Date:12/31/64 Capacity:10,000 TO 19,999 GALLONS Status:Removed Tank Name:RE-18 Substance:HAZARDOUS SUBSTANCE Compartment #:1 Ecology Region:North Western Facility ID:10421 Site ID:64745478 Install Date:12/31/80 Capacity:111 to 1,100 Gallons Status:Removed Tank Name:RE-25 Substance:HAZARDOUS SUBSTANCE Compartment #:1 Ecology Region:North Westam EDR ID Number Database(s)EPA ID Number U003025358 TCt575426.1s Page 22 I Map tD Direction Distance Distance (ft.) Elevaffon Site RENTON PLANT (Continued) Facility ID: Site ID: Install Date: Capacity: Status: Tank Name: Substance: Compartment #: Ecology Region: Facility ID: Site ID: Instal)Date: Capacity: Status: Tank Name: Substance; Compartment #: Ecology Region: Facility ID: Site ID: Install Date: Capacity: Status: Tank Name: Substance: Compartment #: Ecology Region: Facility ID: Site ID: Install Date: Capacity: Status: Tank Name: Substance: Compart]'nent #: Ecology Region: Facility ID: Site ID: Install Date: Capacity: Status: Tank Name: Substance: Compartment #: Ecology Region: 10421 64745478 12/31/61 2,001 TO 4,999 GALLONS Removed RE-27 LEADED GASOLINE 1 North Western 10421 64745478 12/31/62 20,000 TO 29,999 GALLONS Exempt RE-30 HEATING FUEL 1 North Westarn 10421 64745478 12/31/57 20,000 TO 29,999 GALLONS Exempt RE-39 HEATING FUEL 1 North Westem 10421 64745478 12/31181 111 to 1,1go Gallons Removed RE-43 HAZARDOUS SUBSTANCE 1 North Western 1O421 64745478 12/31/79 111 to 1,100 Gallons Removed RED55 HAZARDOUS SUBSTANCE 1 North Western EDR ID Number Database(s)EPA ID Number U00302535g TCI575426.1s Page 23 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I ! I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I Map ID Direction Distance Distance (ft.) Elevation Site f .....3.MARE ND NGS:¢.>.z RENTON PLANT (Continued) Facility ID:10421 Site ID:64745478 Install Date:12/31/80 Capacity:111 to 1,100 Gallons Status:Removed Tank Name:RE-01 Substance:HAZARDOUS SUBSTANCE Compartment #:1 Ecology Region:North Western Facility ID:10421 Site ID:64745478 Install Date:12/31/80 Capacity:111 to 1,100 Gallons Status:Removed Tank Name:RE-02 Substance:HAZARDOUS SUBSTANCE Compartment #:1 Ecology Region:North Western Facility ID:10421 Site ID:64745478 Install Date:12/31/61 Capacity:111 to 1,100 Gallons Status:Removed Tank Name:RE-19 Substance:HEATING FUEL Compartment #:1 Ecology Region:North Western Facility ID:10421 Site ID:64745478 install Date:12/31/64 Capacity:19,000 TO 19,999 GALLONS Status:Removed Tank Name:RE-23 Substance:UNLEADED GASOLINE Compartment#:1 - Ecology Region:Nodh Western Facility ID:10421 Site ID:64745478 Install Date:12/31/50 Capacity:10,000 TO 19,999 GALLONS Status:Removed Tank Name:RE-36 Substance:HAZARDOUS SUBSTANCE Compartment #:1 Ecology Region:North Westam Database(s) EDR ID Number EPA ID Number U003025358 TC1575426.1s Page 24 I Map IO Direction Distance Distance (ft.) Elevation Site h RENTON pLANT (Continued) Facility ID: Site ID: Install Date: Capacity: Status: Tank Name: Substance: Compartment #; Ecology Region: Facility ID: Site ID: Install Date: Capacity: Status: Tank Name: Substance: compartment #: Ecology Region: Facility ID: Site ID: Install Date: Capacity: Status; Tank Name: Substance: compartment #: Ecology Region: Facility ID: Site ID: Install Date: Capacity: Status: Tank Name: Substance: compartment #: Ecology Region: Facility ID: Site ID: Install Date: Capacity: Status: Tank Name: Substance: Compartment #: Ecology Region: 10421 64745478 12/31/57 20,000 TO 29,999 GALLONS Exempt RE-38 HEATING FUEL 1 North We.stem 10421 64745478 12/31/57 20,000 TO 29,999 GALLONS Exempt REO HEATING FUEL 1 North Western 10421 64745478 12/31/81 111 to 1,100 Gallons Removed RE42 HAZARDOUS SUBSTANCE 1 North Western 1O421 64745478 12/31/81 111 to 1,100 Gallons Removed RE4 UNKNOWN 1 North Westam 10421 64745478 12/31/61 20,000 TO 29,999 GALLONS Removed RE46 HEATLNG FUEL 1 North Western Database(s) EDR ID Number EPA ID Number U003025358 TC1575426.1s Page 25 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I Map IO Direc6on Distance Distance (ft.) Elevation Site RENTON PLANT (Continued) Facility ID:10421 Site ID:64745478 Install Date:12/31/61 Capacity:20.000 TO 29,999 GALLONS Status:Removed Tank Name:RE-47 Substance:HEATING FUEL Compartment #:1 Ecology Region:North Western- Facility ID:10421 Site ID:64745478 Install Date:11/30/57 Capacity:50,000 GALLONS OR MORE Status:Removed Tank Name:RE-34 Substance:AVIATION FUEL Compartment #:1 Ecology Region:North Westam Facility ID:10421 Site ID:64745478 Install Date:11130/57 Capacity:50,000 GALLONS OR MORE Status:Removed Tank Name:RE-33 " Substance:AVIATION FUEL Compartment #:1 Ecology Region:North Western Facility ID:10421 Site ID:64745478 Install Date:12/31/64 Capacity:111 to 1,100 Gallons Status:Removed Tank Name:RE-29 Substance:HEATING FUEL Compartment #:1 Ecology Region:North Western Facility ID:10421 Site ID:64745478 Install Date:11130157 Capacity:10,000 TO 19,999 GALLONS Status:Removed Tank Name:RE-35 Substance:AVIATION FUEL Compartment #:1 Ecology Region:North Westam EDR ID Number Database(s)EPA ID Number U003025358 TC1575426.1s Page 26 i Map ID Direction Distance Distance (ft.) Etovation Site h RENTON PLANT (Continued) Facility ID:10421 Site iD:64745478 install Date:12./31/31 Capacity:111 to 1,100 Gallons Status:Removed Tank Name:RE-32 Substance:HEATING FUEL Compartment #:1 Ecology Region:North Western Facility ID:10421 Site ID:64745478 Install Date:12/31/75 Capacity:111 to 1,t00 Gallons Status:Removed Tank Name:RE-45 Substance:HEATING FUEL Compartment #:1 Ecology Region:North Western Facility ID:10421 Site ID:64745478 install Date:05/24193 Capacity:10,000 TO 19,999 GALLONS Status:Operational Tank Name:URE-08t Substance:DIESEL Compartment #:1 Ecology Region:North Western Facility ID:10421 Site ID:64745478 Install Date:05/12/93 Capacity:30,000 TO 49,999 GALLONS Status:Operational Tank Name:URE-080 Substance:AVIATION FUEL Comparknent #:1 Ecology Region:North Western Facility ID:10421 Site ID:64745478 Install Date:05/12/93 Capacity:.30,000 TO 49,999 GALLONS Status:Operational Tank Name:UREa)78 Substance:AVIATION FUEL Compartment #:1 Ecology Region:North Westam EDR ID Number Database(s)EPA ID Number U003025358 TC1575426.1s Page 27 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I Map ID Direction Distance Distance (ft.) Elevation Site •i RENTON pLANT (Continued) Facility ID:10421 Site ID:64745478 Install Date:01101189 Capacity:10,000 TO 19.999 GALLONS Status:Operational Tank Name:URE-76 Substance:UNLEADED GASOLINE Compartment #:1 Ecology Region:North Western Facility ID:10421 Site ID:64745478 Install Date:05/24/93 Capacity:10,000 TO 19,999 GALLONS Status:Operational Tank Name:URE-082 Substance:AVIATION FUEL Compartment #:1 Ecology Region:Nortt Western Facility ID:10421 SLte ID:64745478 Install Date:05112/93 Capacity:30,000 TO 49,999 GALLONS Status:Operational Tank Name:URE-077 Substance:AVIATION FUEL Campar-nent #:1 Ecology Region:North Western Facility ID:10421 Site ID:64745478 Install Data:05/1 2/93 Capacity:30,000 TO 49,999 GALLONS Status:Operational Tank Name:URE-079 Substance:AVIATION FUEL Compartment #:1 Ecology Region:North Western Fadlity ID:10421 Site ID:64745478 Install Date:01/01/89 Capacity:1,101 TO 2,000 GALLONS Status:Operational Tank Name:URE-75 Substance:UNLEADED GASOLINE Compartment #:1 Ecology Region:North Westem Database(s) EDR ID Number EPA ID Number U003025358 TC1575426.1s Page 28 Map IG Direction Distance Distance (ft.) Elevation Site 14+*-.<..........•.....-*-........I RENTON PLANT (Continued) Facility ID:10421 Site ID:64745478 Install Date:12/31/73 Capacity:2,001 TO 4,999 GALLONS Status:Removed Tank Name:RE-67 Substance:HAZARDOUS SUBSTANCE Comparnent #:1 Ecology Region:North Western Facility ID:10421 Site ID:64745478 Instal Date:12/31/66 Capacity:111 to 1,100 Gallons Status:Removed Tank Name:RE-58 Substance:HAZARDOUS SUBSTANCE Compartment #:1 Ecology Region:North Western Fadlity ID:10421 Site ID:64745478 Install Date:12/31/78 Capacity:5,000 TO 9,999 GALLONS Status:Removed Tank Name:RE2 Substance:HAZARDOUS SUBSTANCE Compartment #:1 Ecology Region:North Western Facility ID:10421 Site ID:64745478 Install Date:12/31/92 Capacity:111 to 1,100 Gallons Status:Exempt Tank Name:RE4 Substance;HAZARDOUS SUBSTANCE Compartment #:1 Ecology Region:North Westam Facility ID:10421 Site ID:64745478 Install Date:1 2/31168 Capacity:2,001 TO 4,999 GALLONS Status:Removed Tank Name:RE5 Substance:HAZARDOUS SUBSTANCE Compartment #:1 Ecology Region:North Western EDR IO Number Database(s)EPA ID Number U003025358 TCI575426.1s Page 29 I I I I I I I I I i I I I I I I I I I I I Map ID Direction Distance Distance (ft.) Elevation Site Ir Database(s) EDR ID Number EPA ID Number I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I RENTON pLANT (Continued) Facility ID:10421 Site ID:64745478 Install Date:12/31/61 Capacity:111 to 1,t 00 Gallons Status:Removed . Tank Name:RE-66 Substance:HAZARDOUS SUBSTANCE Compartment #:1 Ecology Region:North Western Facility ID:10421 Site ID:64745478 Install Date:12/31/79 Capacity:2,001 TO 4,999 GALLONS Status:Removed Tank Name:RE-21 Substance:HAZARDOUS SUBSTANCE Compartment #:1 Ecotogy Region:North Westam Facility ID:10421 Site iD:64745478 Install Date:12/31/79 Capacity:2,001 TO 4,999 GALLONS Status:Removed Tank Name:RE-22 Substance:HAZARDOUS SUBSTANCE Compartment #:t Ecology Region:North Westam Facility ID:10421 Site ID:64745478 Install Date:12/31/64 Capacity:111 to 1,100 Gallons Status:Removed Tank Name:RE-4B Substance:HAZARDOUS SUBSTANCE Compartment #:1 Ecotogy Region:North Westam Facility ID:10421 Site ID:64745478 install Date:12/31164 Capacity:111 to 1,100 Gallons Status:Removed Tank Name:RE-49 Substance:HAZARDOUS SUBSTANCE Compartment #:1 Ecology Region:North Westam U003025358 TC1575426.1s Page 30 Map ID Direction. Distance Distance (ft.) Elevation Site B9 SSW 1/4-112 1758 ft. Relative: Higher Actual: 38 ft. B10 SSW 114.112 1758 ft. Relative: Higher Actual: 38 ft. 1 Database(s) EDR ID Number EPA ID Number RENTON PLANT (Continued) Facility ID:10421 Site ID:"64745478 Install Date:12/31/64 Capacity:111 to 1,100 Gallons Status:Removed Tank Name:RE-51 Substance:HAZARDOUS SUBSTANCE Comperfnent #:1 Ecology Region:North Westam FacilRy ID:10421 Site ID:64745478 Install Date:12/31/64 Capacity:111 to 1,100 Gallons Status:Removed Tank Name:RE-50 Substance:HAZARDOUS SUBSTANCE Compartment #:1 Ecology Region:North Western U003025358 BOEING FUEL FARM 800 PARK AVE.N. RENTON,WA 98055 Site 3 of 5 in cluster B WA ICR: Date Ecotugy Received Report: Contaminants Found at Site: Media Contaminated: Cause of Contamination: Region: Type of Report Ecology Received: Site Register issue: County Code: Contact: Report Title: 06/2111994 Petmleum products Groundwater,Soil Tank North Western Intedm cleanup report 93-33 17.00000 Not reported Not reported ICR 5104486103 NIA BOEING CO RENTON BLDG 421 8TH ST I PARKAVE N BLDG 42t RENTON,WA 98055 CSCSL $105430634 NIA Site 4 of 5 in cluster B SHWS: Facility ID:21957 MTSE Code:Not reported Prog plan code :3 UXO Code :Not reported Lat/Long :47 /122 Responsible Unit:Northwest Region Ecology Site Status retative to the MTCA cleanup process: Independent Remedial Action Independent Site Status -those sites undergoing an independent cleanup: Final Independent Remedial Action Report received WARM Bin Number indicates the outcome of the Washington Ranking Model 0NARM): Affected Media Status:R (Hemediatsd)-Contaminants have been eatad,removed,or contained to meet TC1575426.1s Page 31 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I Map ID Direction Distance Distance (ft.) Elevation Site Bll SSW 114-112 1758 ft. Relative: Higher Actual: 38 ft. 12 SE 1-112 1890 ft. Relative: Higher Actual: 65 ft. EDR ID Number Database(s)EPA ID Number BOEING CO RENTON BLDG 421 (Continued)$105430634 cleanup levels established for the site.(This status determination may only be made by Ecology Affected Media :Soil Arsenic Code:Not reported Base/Neutral/Acid Organics: Halogenated Organic Compounds: EPA Pdodty Pollutants -Metals and Cyanide: Metals -Other non-pdodty pollutant medals: Po[ychlodnatad biPhenyls (PCBs): Pesticides: Petroleum Products: Phenolic Compounds: Non-Halogenated Solvents: Dioxin: Polynuclear Aromatic Hydrocarbons (PAH): Reactive Wastes: Corrosive Wastes: Radioactive Wastes: Asbestos: Conventional Contaminants,Organic: Conventional Contaminants,Inorganic: Method Code : LaULong :47"29"56/122"12"15" Not reported Not reported Treated,removed,or contained Not re )orted Not re )orted Not re )ortad Not re )orted Not re orted Not re ortad Not re )erred Not re }erred Not re orted Not re )erred Not re orted Not ns orted Not reported Not reported 99 BOEING 800 PARK RENTON 800 PARK AVE N RENTON,WA 98055 CSCSL NFA S104971579 NIA Site 5 of 5 in cluster B WA NFA: Facility/Site Id : Ecology Status : Independent Status Code : WARM Bin Number : NFA Code : NFA Date : Program Plan Code : NFA Desc : 64745478 Independent Remedial Action Final Indepondant RA Report received Not reported NFA after Assesment IRAP or VCP 12/24/96 3 NFA after assessment,IRAP,or VCP BEADEX MFG CO 833 HOUSER WAY N RENTON,WA 98055 RCRAInfo: Ownen EPA ID: Contact: RCRA-SQG 1000188696 FINDS WAD009486655 UST Classification: BEADEX MFG CO WADO09486655 ANDY CVITKOVICH (425)228-6600 Small Quantity Generator TSDF Ac6vities:Not reported TC1575426.1s Page32 I Map ID Direction Distance Distance (ft.) Elevation Site C13 SSW 1/2-1 2967 ft. Relative: "Higher Actual: 39 R. h i •Database(s) EDR ID Number EPA IO Number BEADEX MFG CO (Continued) Violation Status:No violations found FINDS: Other Pertinent Environmental Activity Identified at Site: RESOURCE CONSERVATION AND RECOVERY ACT INFORMATION SYSTEM WASHINGTON-DEPARTMENT OF ECOLOGY FACILITY/SITE IDENTIFICATION SYSTEM UST: Facility [D:3169 Site ID:18236281 Install Date:12/31/64 Capacity;Not reported Status:Closed in Place Tank Name:2 •Substance:Not reported Compartment #:1 Ecology Region:North Western Facility ID:3169 Site ID:18236281 Install Date:12/31/64 Capacity:Not reported Status:Closed in Place Tank Name:1 Substance:Not reported Compartment #:1 Ecology Region:North Western GARDEN PLAZA/5TH &PARK BLDGS (FIVE REPORTS) PARK AVE.N.I N.SIXTH ST. RENTON,WA 98059 Site 1 of 2 in cluster C WA NFA: Facility/Site Id : Ecology Status : Independent Status Code : WARM Bin Number : NFA Code : NFA Date : Program Plan Code : NPA Desc : WA ICR: Date Ecology Received Report: Contaminants Found at Site: Media Contaminated: Cause of Contamination: Region: Type of Report Ecology Received: Site Register Issue: County Cede: Contact: Report 33tie: 2475 Independent Remedial Action Final Independant RA Report received Not reported Restrictive Convenant,InstitatJonal Controls 04112/94 4 Restrictive Covenant,institutional ConlToIs 0411411994 Total petroleum hydrocarbons Vinyl chloride Gn0undwater,Soil Tank,Spill North Western Final cleanup report 93-33 17.ti9909 Not reported Not reported 1000188696 CSCSL NFA S104971633, ICR N/A TC1575426.1s Page 33 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I i I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I Map IO Direction Distance Distance (ft.) Elevation Site C14 SSW 1/2-1 2974 ft. Relative: Higher Actual: 39 ft. EDR ID Number Database(s)EPA ID Number GARDEN PLAZA PARK AVE N &N 6TH ST RENTON,WA 98055 FINDS 1007080451 VCP 110015571718 INST CONTROL Site 2 of 2 in cluster C FLNDS: Other Pertinent Environmental Activity Identified at Site: WASHINGTON-DEPARTMENT OF ECOLOGY FACILITY/SITE IDENTIFICATION SYSTEM WA iNSTUTIONAL CONTROL: Facility Site Id : Nfa Cede : Nfa Date : Decision Document Id : Document Type : Filing Num (county): Filing Date : Inst Control Doc Id : IC Document Type : Status Of IC Doc Type : County Filing #For Individual IC Doc : Filing Date Of Individual IC Doc : Status Date : IC Category Id : IC CategoP/: Comments: NFA Desc : IC Doc Type : IC Doc Status : IC Category Desc : Facility Site Id : Nfa Code : Nfa Date : Decision Document Id : Document Type : Filing Num (county): Filing Date : Inst Control Doc Id : IC Document Type : Status Of IC Doc Type : County Filing #For Individual IC Doc : Filing Date Of Individual IC Doc : Status Date : IC Category Id : IC Category : Comments: NFA Desc : IC Doc Type : 2475 Restrictive Covenant,Institutional Controls 4112/1994 00:00:00 401 VCP 9409020504 812611994 00:00:00 1 6 Active 9409020504 812611994 00:00:00 8/26/1994 00:00:00 699 Ground Water Restriction RC obtained by the Boeing Company.Residual concentrations of petroleum hydrocarbons remain in soil and gw that exceed Method A cleanup standards. RC obtained by the Boeing Company.Residual concentrations of petrotsum hydrocarbons remain in soil and gw thatexceed Method A cleanup standards. Restrictive Covenant,Institutional Controls VCP Active Ground Water Restriction 2475 Restrictive Covenant,Institutional Controls 4/12/1994 00:00:00 401 VCP 9409020504 8/2611994 00:00:00 1 6 Active 9409020504 8/26/1994 00:00:00 8/2611994 00:00:00 700 Maintenance Requirements RCobtained by the Boeing Company.Residual concentrations of petroleum hydrocarbons remain in soil and gw that exceed Method A cleanup standards. RC obtained by the Boeing Company.Residual concentrations of petroleum hydrocarbons remain in soil and gw that exceed Method A cleanup standards. Restrictive Covenant,Institutional Controls VCP TC1575426.1s Page34 I Map ID Direction Distance Distance (ft.) Elevation "Site 16 SSW 3276 . Retate: Equal Actual: 36 ft. il I EDR ID Number Database(s)EPA ID Number GARDEN PLAZA (Continued) IC Dec Status : IC Category Desc : VCP: Facility ID : WARM BIN #: Ecology Status : NFA Code : Active Maintenance Requirements 2475 Not raported Independent Remedial Action Reslrictive Covenant,Institutional Controls 1007080451 BOEING RENTON 800 N 6TH ST RENTON,WA 98055 CERCUS-NFRAP Classification Data: Federal Facility:Not a Federal Facility Non NPL Code:NFRAP NPL Status:Not on the NPL CERCLIS-NFRAP Assessment History: Assessment:DISCOVERY Assessment:PRELIMINARY ASSESSMENT Assessment:ARCHIVE SITE CERCLIS-NFRAP Aiias Name(s): BOEING COMPANY CORPORATE CORRACTS Data: EPA Id: Region: Area Name: Actual Date: ColTective Action:. 2002 NAICS Title: EPA Id: Region: Area Name: Actual Date: Corrective Action: 2002 NAICS Title: WAD009262171 10 ENTIRE FACiLiTY 01/15/1993 CA050 -RFA Completed Aircraft Manufacturing Aircraft Manufacturing EPA ld: Region: Area Name: Actual Date: Correct'we Action: 2002 NAICS Ti0e: EPA Id: Region: CSCSL RCRA-LQG TRIS RCRA-TSDF RAATS CORRACTS CERC-NFRAP ICR US ENG CONTROLS 'US INST CONTROL CA HAZNET Completed:10/01/1981 Completed:IZ/2011984 Completed:12/20/1984 WAD009262171 10 ENTIRE FACILITY 01118/1995 CA070YE -RFA Determination Of Need For An RFI,RFI is Necessary Aircraft Manufacturing Aircraft Manufacturing WAD009262171 10 URE 05/06 6113011993 CA650 -Stabilization Construction Completed Aircraft Manufacturing Aircraft Manufacturing WAD009262171 10 1000257076 98055THBNGST TC1575426.1s Page 35 I I I I I I I I I I i I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I Map ID Direction Distance Distance (ft.) Elevation Site BOEING RENTON (Continued) Area Name: Actual Date: Corrective Action: 2002 NAICS Title: ENTIRE FACILITY O3/1111997 CA060 -Notice of Contamination Aircraft Manufacturing Aircraft Manufactudng EPA Id:WAD009262t 71 Region:10 Area Name:BLD 4-78/79,4-42,4-21W,4-44 Actual Date:03/23/1999 Correctwe Action:CA150 -RFI Workplan Approved 2002 NAICS Title:Aircraft Manufacturing Aircraft Manufactudng tlirk thi hvr=rtink while viewing on your computer to access 37 additional CORRACTS record(s)in the EDR Site Report. US Engineering Control Sites: EPA ID:WAD009262171 Site ID:Not reported EPA Region:10 County:KING Event Code :CA770GW Actual Date:06/01/04 Action ID:Not reported Acon Name:Not reported Action Completion date:Not reported Planned Completion date:Not reported Operable Unit:Not reported Contaminated Media:Not reported Contain.Media num,:Not repotted Engineering Control:Not reported Action ID:Not reported Action Name:Not reported Action Completion date:Not reported Planned Completion date:Not reported Operable Unit:Not reported Contaminated Media:Not reported Contam.Media num.:Not reported Engineering Contoh Not reported US INST CONTROL: EPA ID :WAD009262171 Name :BOEING RENTON Address :800 N 6TH ST RENTON 98055 County :KING Region :10 Event Code :Not reported Actual Dt :10-OCT-97 EPA ID '.WAD009262171 Name :BOEING RENTON Address :800 N 6TH ST RENTON 98055 County :KING Region :10 Event Cede :Not reported EDR ID Number Database(s)EPA ID Number 1O00257076 TC1575426.1S Page 38 Map ID Direction Distance Distance (ft.) Elevation Site Database(s) BOEING RENTON (Continued) Actual Dt :10-OCT-97 EPA ID :WAD009262171 Name :BOEING RENTON Address :800 N 6TH ST RENTON 98055 County :KING Region :10 Event Code :Not reported Actual Dt :10-OCT-97 RCRAInfo Corrective AcSon Summary: Event:Current Human Exposures under Control.Yes.Current Human Exposures Under Event Date: Event: Event Date: Event: Event Date: Event: Event Date: Event: Event Date: Event: Event Date: Event: Event Date: Event: Event Date: Event: Event Date: Event: Event Date: Event: Event Date: Event: Event Date: Control has been vedtied.Based on a review of information contained in the El determination,current human exposures are expected to be under control at the facility under current and reasonably expected conditions.This determination will be re-evaluated when the Agency/State becomes aware of sign[tic.ant changes at the tacil[ty. 09/01/2005 Igretion of Contaminated Groundwater under Control,More information is needed to make a determination. O910112005 Current Human Exposures under Controt,More information is needed to make a determination. 08/05/2004 Igration of Contaminated Groundwater under Control,More information is needed to make a determination. 08/05/2004 CMS Workplan Approved 06/16/2004 CA770GW 0610112004 Current Human Exposures under Control,More information is needed to make a determination. 12/31/2001 Igration of Contaminated Groundwater under Ceef:d,More information is needed to make a determination. 12/31/2001 RFI Approved 1 6/03/2001 RFI Workplan Approved 0312311999 RFI Imposition,Focused data collection required for stabitization evaluation. 10/10/1997 CA770NG 16/15/1997 EDR ID Number EPA ID Number 1000257076 TC1575426.1s Page 37 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I i I I I I I i I I i I I i I I I Map ID Direction Distance Distance (ft.) Elevation Site BOEING RENTON Continued) Event: Event Date: Event: Event Date: Event: Event Date: Event: Event Date: Event: Event Date: Event: Event Date: Event: Event Date: Event: Event Date: Event: Event Date: Event: Event Date: Event: Event Date: Event: Event Date: Event: Event Date: Event: Event Date: Event: Event Date: Event: Event Date: Event: Event Date: i Database(s) CA7721D 1011011997 CA772EP 1O11O11997 Current Human Exposures under Control,More information is needed to make a determination.09/28/1997 Igration of Contaminated Groundwater under Control,More information is needed to make a determination. 09/28/1997 Notice of Contamination 03/11/1997 CA770GW 08/1111995 RFA Determination Of Need ForAn RFI,RFI is Necessary; 01/18/1995 Stabilization Constrction Completed 01/30/1993 RFA Comptated 01115/1993 Stabilization Construction Completed 12/31/1992 Stabilization Measures Evaluation,This facility is amenable to stabilization actively based on the status of corrective action work at the facility, technical factors,the degree of tisk,timing considerations and administrative considerations. 10107/1992 RFA Determination Of Need For An RFI,RFI is Necessary; 10/08/1991 CA Pdodtization,Facility or area was assigned a high COlTective action pdotity. 10/08/1991 RFA Completed 05/2311991 CA770GW 10/15/1990 Stebilization Construction Completed 0713111990 Stabilization Measures implemented,Groundwater extraction and treatment (e.g.,to achieve groundwater confa[nment,to achieve MCL). 12/22/1989 EDR LD Number EPA ID Number 1000257076 TCt575426.1s Page 38 Map ID Direction Distance Distance (ft.) Elevation Site EDR IO Number Database(s)EPA ID Number BOEING RENTON (Continued)1000257076 RCRAInfo: Owner:BOEING CO (425)865-2400 EPA ID:WAD009262171 Contact:Not reported Classification:Ladle Quantity Generater,TSDF TSDF ActMties:Not reported BIENNIAL REPORTS: Last Biennial Reporting Year:2003 Waste D0Ol 155204.18 D063 2244.73 D005 604314.18 D007 659535.00 D0O9 6990.02 D011 6810.00 D028 38869.36 D035 9016.00 F002 227279.30 FO05 154084.30 F007 20.00 P098 10,00 U019 1475.60 U159 1475.00 U226 1475.00 Vka6on Status:Violations exist Regula6on Violated: Area ofViolation: Date Violation Determined: Actual Date Achieved Compliance: Enforcement Action: Enforcement Action Date: Penalty Type: Regulation Violated: Area of Violation: Date Violation Determined: Actual Date Achieved Compliance: Enforcement Action: Enforcement Action Date: Penalty Type: Regulation Violated: Area of Violation: Date Violation Determined: Actual Date Achieved Compliance: Enforcement Action: Enforcement Action Date: Penalty Type: Regula6on Violated: Area of Violation: Date Violation Determined: Actual Date Achieved Compliance: Waste D602 6759.18 D004 2244.18 D006 616298.68 DOO8 621295.00 O010 597239.00 D018 532761.00 D029 75150.00 D039 37575.00 F003 151594,36 F006 62120,00 F019 62120.00 P106 10.00 U080 20.85 U220 1475.00 -200(1)(b)/-030(5)(a) GENERATOR-GENERAL REQUIREMENTS 0111812O01 03/19/2001 WRIT£EN INFORMAL 02/2612001 Not reported 200(2)(a),200(1)(c) GENERATOR-GENERAL REQUIREMENTS 02/0311999 02/0911999 WRITTENINFORMAL 02/1011999 Not reported 200(1)(d) GENERATOR-GENERAL REQUIREMENTS 02/0311999 02/11/1999 WRITTEN INFORMAL 62/1011999 •Not reported 160(2)(A)AND (3)(C) GENERATOR3ENERAL REQUIREMENTS 02/0311999 03/01/1999 TC1575426.1s Page 39 I I I I I I I I I i I I I i I I ! I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I Map ID Direction Distance Distance (ft.) Elevation Site BOEING RENTON (Continued) Enforcement Action: Enforcement Action Date: Penalty Type: Regulation Violated: Area of Violation: Date Violation Determined: Actual Date Achieved Compliance: Enforcement Action: Enforcement Action Date: Penalty Type: Regulation Violated: Area of Violation: Date Violation Determined: Actual Date Achieved Compliance: Enforcement Action: Enforcement Ac6on Date: Penalty Type: Regulation Violated: Area of Violation: Date Violation Determined:" Actual Date Achieved Compliance: Enforcement Action: Enforcement Action Date: Penalty Type: RegulaSon Violated: Area ofViolation: Date Violation Determined: Actual Date Achieved Compliance: Enforcement Action: Enforcement Action Date: Penalty Type: Regula0on Violated: Area of Violation: Date Violation Determined: Actual Date Achieved Compliance: Enforcement Action: Enforcement Action Date: Penalty Type: Regulation Violated: Area of Violation: Date Violation Determined: Actual Date Achieved Compliance: Enforcement Action: Enforcement Action Date: Penalty Type: Regulation Violated: Area ofViolation: Date Violation Determined: Actual Date Achieved Compliance: Enforcement Action: WRITTEN INFORMAL 02/1011999 Not reported 350 GENERATOR-GENERAL REQUIREMENTS 02/0311999 03/30/1999 WRITTEN INFORMAL 02/1011999 Not reported •200(1)(b)&ref 630(5)(a) GENERATOR-GENERAL REQUIREMENTS 02/1511995 0312711995 WRITTEN INFORMAL 03/21/1995 Not reported •200(1)(d) GENERATOR-GENERAL REQUIREMENTS 02/1511995 02/1511995 WRITTEN INFORMAL 0312111995 Not reported 200(1)(b)&ref630(3) GENERATOR-GENERAL REQUIREMENTS 02/1511905 0410711995 WRITTEN INFORMAL 0312111995 Not reported 200(1)(b)&ref 630(5)(a) GENERATOR-GENERAL REQUIREMENTS 02/1511995 03/27/1995 WRITTEN INFORMAL 0312111995 Not reported 2O0(t)(c) GENERATOR-GENERAL REQUIREMENTS 02/1511995 02/1511995 WRITi-EN INFORMAL 03/21/1995 Not reported 360(2)(j-k) GENERATOR-GENERAL REQUIREMENTS 02/15/1995 0411411995 WRITTEN INFORMAL Database(s) EDR ID Number EPA ID Number 1000257076 TC1575426.1s Page40 Map ID Direction Distance Distance (ft.) Elevation Site HI '1........................MAFINDINGS,.,.,,........ BOEING RENTON (Continued) Enforcement Action Date: Penalty Type: Regulation Violated: Area of Violation: Date Violation Determined: Actual Date Achieved Compliance: Enforcement Action: Enforcement Action Date: Penalty Type: Enforcement Action: Enforcement Action Date: Penalty Type: Enforcement Action: Enforcement Action Date: Penalty Type: Regulation Violated: Area of Violation: Date Violation Determined: Actual Date Achieved Compliance: Enforcement Action: Enforcement Action Date: Penalty Type: Enforcement Action: Enforcement Action Date: Penalty Type: Enforcement Action: Enforcement Action Date: Penalty Type: Regulation Violated: Area of Violation: Date Violation Determined: Actual Date Achieved Compliance: Enforcement Action: Enforcement Action Date: Penalty Type: Enforcement Action: Enforcement Action Date: Penalty Type: Enforcement Action: Enforcement Action Date: PenaLty Type: Regulation Violated: Area of Violation: Date Violation Determined: Actual Date Achieved Compliance: Enforcement Action: Enforcement Action Date: Penalty Type: Enforcement Action: Enforcement Action Date: 0312111995 Not reported Not reported GENERATOR-MANIFEST REQUIREMENTS 02/1011993 07/20/1993 WRITrEN INFORMAL 07114/1993 Not reported WRITTEN INFORMAL 07105/1991 Not reported WRITTEN INFORMAL 03/08/1985 Not reported Not reported TSD:ONTAINERS REQUIREMENTS 02/10/1993 07/2011993 WRITTEN INFORMAL 07/14/1993 Not reported WRI]3-EN INFORMAL 07/05/1991 Not reported WRITTEN INFORMAL 0411411987 Not reported Not reported TSD-GENERAL STANDARDS 01/22/1993 01/22/1993 WRI3q'EN INFORMAL 07/14/1993 Not reported WRITTEN INFORMAL 07/05/1991 Not reported WRITTEN INFORMAL 04/14/1987 Not reported -630(5)(A) TSD-CONTAINERS REQUIREMENTS 0413011991 0813011991 WRITTEN INFORMAL 0711411993 Not reported WRITFEN INFORMAL 07/0511991 EDR ID Number Database(s)EPAID Number 1000257076 TC1575426.1s Page 41 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I i I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I Map ID Direction Distance Distance (ft.) ElevaUon Site IL ......................................I-EINDINGS,::i:4 Database(s) BOEING RENTON (Continued) Penalty Type: Enforcement Action: Enforcement Action Date: Penalty Type: Regulation Violated: Area of Violation: Date Violation Determined: Actual Date Achieved Compliance: Enforcement Action: Enforcement Action Date: Penalty Type: Regulation Violated: Area of Violation: Date Violation Determined: Actual Date Achieved Compliance: Enforcement Action: Enforcement Action Date: Penalty Type: Regulation Violated: Area of Victation: Date Violation Determined: Actual Date Achieved Compliance: Enforcement Action: Enforcement Action Date: Penalty Type:. Enforcement Action: Enforcement Action Data: Penalty Type: Enforcement Action: Enforcement Action Date: Penalty Type: Regulation Violated: Area of Violation: Date Violation Determined: Actual Date Achieved Compliance: Enforcement Action: Enforcement Action Date: Penalty Type: Enforcement Action: Enforcement Action Date: Penalty Type: Enforcement Action: Enforcement Action Date: Penalty Type: Regulation Violated: Area of Violation: Date Victation Determined: Actual Data Achieved Compliance: Enforcement Action: Enforcement Action Date: Not reported WRI'CIEN INFORMAL 0310811985 Not reported -320(2)(D) TSD-GENERAL STANDARDS 0413011991 08/15/1991 WRII-rEN iNFORMAL 0710511991 Not reported -060(2) TSD-PART B APPLICATION 0413011991 08/28/1991 WRI"CIEN INFORMAL 0710511991 Not reported -350 (4)(5) TSD-CONTINGENCY pLAN REQUREMENTS 04/30/1991 0712511991 WRITTEN INFORMAL 0711411993 Not reported WRITTEN INFORMAL 0710511991 Not reported WRITTEN INFORMAL 0411411987 Not reported -200(1)(C) TSD-GENERAL STANDARDS 0413O11991 0413011991 WRI'I-iEN iNFORMAL 07/14/1993 Not reported WRI'ITEN INFORMAL 0710511991 Not reported WRIi'EN INFORMAL 0411411987 Not reported Not reported TSD-OTHER REQUIREMENTS (OVERSIGHT) 04/14/1988 04/3O11991 WRITTEN INFORMAL 07/05/1991 EDR ID Number EPA ID Number :1000257076 TC1575426.1s Page 42 Map ID Direction Distance Distance (ft.) Elava0on Site EDR ID Number Database(s)EPA ID Number BOEING RENTON (Continued) Penalty Type: Regulation Violated: Area of Violation: Date Violation Determined: Actual Date Achieved Compliance: Enforcement Action: Enforcement Action Date: Penalty Type: Enforcement Action: Enforcement Action Date: Penalty Type: Enforcement AcIon: Enforcement Action Date: Penalty Type; Not reported Not reported TSD-FINANCIAL RESPONSIBILITY REQUIREMENTS 031O811985 05/10/1985 WRITrEN INFORMAL 07/14/1993 Not reported WRI3q-EN iNFORMAL 07/05/1991 Not reported WRITTEN INFORMAL 03/08/1985 Not reported 1000257076 There are 21 violation record(s)reported at this site: Evaluagon Area ofViotaIon Compliance Evaluation Inspection Compliance Evaluation Inspection Compliance Evaluation Inspection Compliance Evaluation Inspection Compliance Evaluation Inspection Compliance Evaluation Inspection Compliance Evaluation Inspection Financial Record Review Date of Co_.m_pbence GENERATOR-GENERAL REQUIREMENTS 20010319 GENERATOR-GENERAL REQUIREMENTS 19990209 GENERATOR-GENERAL REQUIREMENTS 19990211 GENERATOR-GENERAL REQUIREMENTS 19990301 GENERATOR-GENERAL REQUIREMENTS 19990330 GENERATOR-GENERAL REQUIREMENTS 19950327 GENERATOR-GENERAL REQUIREMENTS 19950215 GENERATOR-GENERAL REQUIREMENTS 19950327 GENERATOR-GENERAL REQUIREMENTS 19950407 GENERATOR-GENERAL REQUIREMENTS 19950414 GENERATOR-GENERAL REQUIREMENTS 19950215 GENERATOR-MANIFEST REQUIREMENTS 19930720 TSD-CONTAINERS REQUIREMENTS 19930720 TSD-GENERAL STANDARDS 19930122 TSD-CONTAINERS REQUIREMENTS 19910830 TSD-GENERAL STANDARDS 19910430 TSD-CONTINGENCY PLAN REQUREMENTS 19910725 TSD-GENERAL STANDARDS 19910815 TSD-PART B APPLICATION 19910828 TSD-OTHER REQUIREMENTS (OVERSIGHT)19910430 TSD-GENERAL STANDARDS 19910430 TSD:ONTINGENCY PLAN REQUREMENTS 19910725 TSD-FINANCIAL RESPONSIBILITY REQUIREMENTS 19850510 SHWS: Facility ID:2097 MTBE Code:Not reported Prog plan code :2 UXO Cede :Not reported Lat/Long ;47 /122 Responsible Unit:Northwest Region Ecology Site Status relative to the MTCA cleanup process: Remedial Action in progress Independent Site Status -those sites undergoing an independent cleanup: Not reported WARM Bin Number indicates the outcome of the Washington Ranking Model 0h/ARM): Affected Media Status:C (Confirmed)-The presence of hazardous substances above MTCA cleanup levels has TC1575426,1s Page 43 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I Map ID Direction Distance Distance (ft.) Elevation Site Database(s) EDR ID Number ESA iD Number BOEING RENTON (Continued) been confirmed by laboratory analysis (orfield determination in the case of petroleum contamination) Affected Media :Ground Water Arsenic Code:Not reported Base/Neutral/Acid Organics: Halogenated Organic Compounds: EPA Pdority Pollutants -Metals and Cyanide: Metals -Other non-pdodty pollutant medals: Po[ychlodnated biPhenyls (PCBs): Pesticides: Petroleum Products: Phenolic Compounds: Non-Halogerated Solvents: Dioxin: Polynuclear Aromatic Hydrocarbons (PAH): Reactive Wastes: COTOSiVe Wastes: Radioactive Wastes: Asbestos: Conventional Contaminants.Organic: Conventional Contaminants.Inorganic: Method Code : Lat/Long :47"29"45"1122"12'28" Not reported Confirmed above MTCA cleanup levels Confirmed above MTCA cleanup levels Confirmed above MTCA cleanup levels Confirmed above MTCA cleanup levels Not reported Confirmed above MTCA cleanup levels Confirmed above MTCA cleanup levels Confirmed above MTCA cleanup levels Not reported Suspected to be present Not reported Suspected to be present Not reported Suspected to be present Not reported Confirmed above MTCA cleanup levels 3 1000257076 Facility ID:2097 MTBE Code:Not reported Prog plan code ;2 UXO Cede :Not reported LaULong :47 /122 Responsible Unit:Northwest Region Ecology Site Status relative to the MTCA cleanup process: Remedial Action in progress Independent Site Status -those sites undergoing an independent cleanup: Not reported WARM Bin Number indicates the outcome of the Washington Ranking Model (WARM): Affected Media Status:S (Suspected)-Due to preliminary investigations or the nature of business operadons or manufactudng processes,certain contaminants are suspected to be present at the site Affected Media :Surface Water Arsenic Code:Not reported Base/Neutrat/Acid Organics:Not reported Halogenated Organic Compounds:Suspected to be present EPA Pdodty Pollutants -Metals and Cyanide:Suspected to be present Metals -Other non-priority pollutant medals:Suspected to be present Polychlodnated biPhenyls (PCEs):Suspected to be present Pesticides:Not reported Petroleum Products:Suspected to be present Phenolic Compounds:Suspected to be present Non-Halogenated Solvents:Suspected to be present Dioxin:Not reported Polynuclear Aromatic Hydrocarbons (PAH):Suspected to be present Reactive Wastes:Not reported Corrosive Wastes:Suspected to be present Radioactive Wastes:Not reported Asbestos:Suspected to be present Conventional Contaminants.Organic:Not reported Conventional Contaminants.Inorganic:Suspected to be present TC1575426.1s Page 44 Map ID Direction Distance Distance (ft.) Elevation Site EDR ID Number Database(s)EPA ID Number BOEING RENTON (Continued) Method Code : Lat/Long :47"29"45"/122"12"28" 1000257076 Facility ID;2097 MTBE Code:Not reported Prog plan code :2 UXO Code :Not reported LaULong :47/122 Responsible Unit:Northwest Region Ecology Site Status relative to the MTCA cJeanup process: Remedial Acfion in progress Independent Site Status -those sites undergoing an independent cleanup: Not reported WARM Bin Number indicates the outcome of the Washington Ranking Model 0h/ARM): Affected Media Status:C(Confirmed)-ThepresenceofhazardoussubstancesabeveMTCAcieanuplevelshas been confirmed by laboratory analysis (or field detarminafion in the case of petroleum contamination) Affected Media :Soil Arsenic Code:Not reported Base/Neutral/Acid Organics: Halegenatod Organic Compounds: EPA Pdodty Pollutants -Metals and Cyanide: Metals -Other non-pdodty pollutant medals: Polychlodnated biPhenyls (PCBs): Pesticides: Petroleum products: Phenolic Compounds: Non-Halogenated Solvents: Dioxin: Poiynuclear AomatJc Hydrocarbons (PAH): Reactive Wastes: Corrosive Wastes: Radioactive Wastes: Asbestos: Convenbenal Contaminants,Organic: Conventional Contaminants,Inorganic: Method Code : Lat/Long :47"29"45"1122'12"28" WA ICR: Date Ecology Received Report: Contaminants Found at Site: Media Contaminated: Cause of Contamination: Region: Type of Report Ecology Received: Site Register Issue: County Code: Contact: Report Title: Date Ecology Received Report: Codtaminants Found at Site: Media Contaminated: Cause of Contamination: Region: Type of Report Ecology Received: Site Register Issue: Not reported Confirmed above MTCA cleanup levels Confirmed above MTCA cleanup levels Confirmed above MTCA cleanup levels Confirmed ab6ve MTCA cleanup levels Not reported Confirmed above MTCA cleanup levels Confirmed above MTCA cleanup levels Confirmed above MTCA cleanup levels Not reported Suspected to be present Not reported Suspected to be present Not reported Suspected to be present Not repoded Confirmed above MTCA cleanup levels 3 07/15/1996 Petroleum products Groundwater,Soil Tank North Westem Final cleanup report 98-15 17.00000 Not reported Not reported 08/2411992 Petroleum products Groundwater,Soil Tank North Western Intedm cleanup report 92-49 TC1575426.1s Page 45 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I ! I ! I l I ! I I ! I I I I Map ID Direction Distance Distance (ft.) Eleva6on Site i Database(s) EDR [D Number EPA ID Number BOEING RENTON (Continued) 17.00000 Notrepoed Notrepoed County Code: Contact: Report Title: HAZNET: Gepaid:WAD009262171 TSD EPA ID:CAD009452657 Gen County:99 Tsd County;San Mateo Tons:1.5500 Facility Address 2:Not reported Waste Category:Unspecified oil-containing waste Disposal Method:Treatment,Incineration Contact:THE BOEING COMPANY Telephone:(206)655-7431 Mailing Name:Not reported Mailing Address:PO BOX 3707 M/S 6341 SEATTLE,WA 98124 -2207 County 99 Gepaid:WAD009262171 TSD EPA ID:CAD009452657 Gen County:99 Tsd County:San Mateo Tons:2.7519 Facility Address 2:Not reported Waste Category:Waste oil and mixed oil Disposal Method:RecycJer Contact:THE BOEING COMPANY Telephone:(206)655-7431 Mailing Name:Not reported Mailing Address:PO BOX 3707 M/S 631 SEATFLE,WA 98124 -2207 County 99 Gepaid:WAD009262171 TSD EPA ID:CAD009452657 Gen County:99 Tsd County:San Mateo Tons:43,0700 Facility Address 2:Not reported Waste Category:Organic liquids with metals Alkaline solution (pH <UN->12.5)with metals (an6mony,arsenic,baffum,beryllium,cadmium,chromium,cobalt,copper, lead,mercury,molybdenum,nickel,selenium,silver,thallium,vanadium, and zinc) Disposal Method:Treatment,Incineration Contact:THE BOEING COMPANY Telephone:(206)655-7431 Mailing Name:Not reported Mailing Address:PO BOX 3707 M/S 63-41 SEATTLE,WA 98124 -2207 County 99 1000257876 TC1575426.1s Page 46 i. Map ID Direction Distance Distance (if,) Elevation Site 16 SBW 1/2-1 3529 ft. Relative: Higher Actual: 37ft. m ?':'":'-:'';:'-''","T*-,7,:'=:1 BOEING RENTON (Continued) Gepaid:WAD009262171 TSD EPA ID:CAD009452657 Gen County:99 Tsd County:San Mateo Tons:1.0050 Fadlity Address 2:Not reported Waste Category:Laboratory waste chemicals Disposal Method:Treathlent,Incineration Contact:THE BOEING COMPANY Telephone:(206)655-7431 Mailing Name:Not reported County . Gepaid: TSD EPA ID: Gen County: Tsd County: Tons: Facilk'y Address 2: Waste Category: Disposal Method; Contact: •Telephone: Mailing Name: Mail!ng Address:PO BOX 3707 M/S 63-41 SEATTLE,WA 98124 *2207 99 WADO09262171 CAD009452657 99 San Mateo 1.2075 Not reported Organic solids with halogens Recyclar THE BOEING COMPANY (206)655-7431 Not repotted Mailing Address:PO BOX 3707 M/S 63-41 $EA'i-rLE,WA 98124 -2207 County 99 lirk thi hvn=dink while viewing on your computerto access 141 additional CA HAZNET record(s)in the EDR Site Report. EDR ID Number Database(s)EPA ID Number 1000257076 GRADY YOUNGMAN CSCSE S104971643 523 PELLY AVE N NIA RENTON,WA 98055 SHWS: Facility ID:2515 MTBE Code:Not reported \ Prog plan code :4 UXO Code :Not repotted LatJLong :47/122 Responsible Unit:Northwest Region Ecology Site Status relative to the MTCA cleanup process: Independent Remedial Action Independent Site Status -those sites undergoing an independent cleanup: Final Independent Remedial Action Report received WARM Bin Number indicates the outcome of the Washington Ranking Mlel (WARM): Affected Media Status:R (Remodiated)-Contaminants have been treated,removed,or contained to meet cleanup levels established for the site.(This status detarmina6on may only be made •by Ecoleg' Affected Media :Ground Water Arsenic Code:Not reported Base/Neutral/Acid Organics:Not reported Halogenatad Organic Compounds:Not reported EPA Pdodty Pollutants -Metals and Cyanide;Not reported Metals -Other nan-pdodty pollutant medals:Not reported TC1575426.1s Pege 47 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I Map ID D[recgon Distance Distance (ft.) Elevation Site r Database(s) EDR ID Number EPA ID Number GRADY YOUNGMAN (Continued) Polychlodnated biPbeny[s (PCBs): Pesticides: Petroleum Products: Phenolic Compounds: Non-Halogenated Solvents: Dioxin: Polynuclear Aromatic Hydrocarbons (PAH): Reactive Wastes: Corrosive Wastes: Radioactive Wastes: Asbestos: Conventional Contaminants,Organic: Conventional Contaminants.Inorganic: Method Code : Lat/Long :47'29"27"1122"12"15" Not reported Not reported Treated,removed,or contained Not reported Not reported Not reported Not reported Not reported Not reported Not reported Not reported Not reported Not reported 18 S104971643 Facility ID:2515 MTBE Code:Not reported Prog plan code :4 UXO Cede :Not reported Lat/Long :47 /122 Responsible Unit:Northwest Region Ecology Site Status relative to the MTCA cleanup process: Independent Remedial Action Independent Site Status -those sites undergoing an independent cleanup: Final Independent Remedial Action Report received WARM Bin Number indicates the outcome of the Washington Ranking Model (WARM): Affected Media Status:R (Remediated)-Contaminants have been treated,removed,or contained to meet cleanup levels established forthe site.(This status determination may only be made by Ecology Affected Media :Soil Arsenic Code:Not reported Base/Neutral/Acid Organics: Halbgenated Organic Compounds: EPA Pdodty Pollutants -Metals and Cyanide: Metals -Other non-priority pollutant medals: Polychlednated biPheny[s (PCBs): Pesticides: Petroleum Products: Phenolic Compounds: Non-Halogenated Solvents: Dioxin: Polynuclear Aromatic Hydrocarbons (PAH): Reactive Wastes: Corrosive Wastes: Radioactive Wastes: Asbestos: Conventional Contaminants.Organic: Conventional Contaminants,Inorganic: Method Code : Lat/Long :47 29"27"/122"12"16" Not reported Not reported Not reported Not reported Not reported Not reported Treated,removed,or contained Not re orted Not re )orted Not re >orted Not re >orted Not re >orted Not re >orted Not re )orted Not re )orted Not re )orted Not re x)rted 18 TC1575426,1s Page 48 i,,........++m,,.--+..--+++--+.......++++-.,IIMapID........-.*+M.=F FJNDINGS+.......,-_...>:tDirection[t.............................I DistanceDistance (ft.)EDR ID Number Elevation Site Database(s)EPA ID Number 17 WALTS SERVICE CENTER CSCSL $1051fi2439 SSW 546 BURNEI-r AVE N NIA 1/2-1 RENTON,WA 98055 3716 ft, Relative: Lower Actual: 35ft. SHWS: Facility ID:62238722 MTBE Code:Not reported Prog plan code :Not reported UXO Code :Not reported Lat/Long :47 /122 Responsible Unit:Northwest Region Ecology Site Status relagve to the MTCA cleanup process: Independent Remedial Action Independent Site Status -those sites undergoing an independent cleanup: Independent Site Assessment of thtedm Remedial AcUon Report received WARM Bin Number indicates the outcome of the Washington Ranking Model (WARM): Affected Media Status:B (Below).The presence of hazardous substancas below MTCA cleanup levetshas been confirmed by laboratory analysis (or field determination in the case of petroleum products).The B code may only be applied following completion ofanalytical work in conjunction with a Site Hard Assessment(SHA)or Remedial Investigation/Feasibility Study (RFS) Affected Media :Ground Water Arsenic Code:Not reported Base/Neutral/AcJd Organics: Hatsgenated Organic Compounds: EPA Pdodty Pollutants -Metals and Cyanide: Metals -Other non-pdedty pollutant medals: polychlednated biPhenyts (PCBs): Pesticides: Petloleum Products: Phenolic Compounds: Non-Halogenated Solvents: Dioxin: Polynuclear Aromatic Hydrocarbons (PAH): Reactive Wastes: Corrosive Wastes: Radioactive Wastes: Asbestos: Conventional Contaminants,Organic: Convenfional Contaminants,Inorganic: Method Code : Let/Long :47"29"31"1122"12"23" Not reported Not reported Not reported Not reported Not reported Not reported Below MTCA cleanup levels Not reported Below MTCA cleanup levels Not re }orted Not re >orted Not re )orted Not rE orted Not re orted Not m orted Not r orted Not r orted 2 Facility ID:62238722 MTBE Code:Not reported Prog plan code :Not reported UXO Code :Not reported Lat/Long :471 122 Responsible Unit:Northwest Region Ecology Site Status relative to the MTCA cleanup process: Independent Remedial Acfion Independent Site Status -those sites undergoing an independent cleanup: Independent Site Assessment of Intsdm Remedial Action Report received WARM Bin Number indicates the outcome ofthe Washington Ranking Model (WARM): Affected Media Status:C (Contirmed)-The presence of hazardous substances above MTCA cleanup levels has been confirmed by laboratory analysis (or field determination in the case of petroleum contamination) Affected Media :Soil TC1575426.ts Page 49 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I Map ID Direction Distance Distance (f.) Eleval/on Site 18 SW 1/2-1 3855 ft. Relative: Lower Actual: 30 ft. i::-:=,,:,'.;:'':-.'".i,c'.': EDR ID Number Datsbese(s)EPA ID Number WALTS SERVICE CENTER (Continued) Arsenic Code:Not reported Base/Neutral/Acid Organics: Halogenatad Organic Compounds: EPA priority Pollutants -Metals and Cyanide: Metals -Other non-pdodty pollutant medals: potychlodnatad biPhenyls (PCBs): Pesticides: Petrotaum Products: Phenolic Compounds; Non-Halogenatad Solvents: Oioxin: Polynuclear Aromatic Hydrocarbons (PAH): Reactive Wastes: Con'osive Wastes: Radioactive Wastes: Asbestos: Conventional Contaminants,Organic: Conventional Contaminants.inorganic: Method Code : Lat/Long :47"29"31"/122"12'23" Not reported Not reported Confirmed above MTCA cleanup levels Not reported Not reported Not reported Confirmed above MTCA cleanup levels Not reported Confirmed above MTCA cleanup levels Not reported Not reported Not reported Not reported Not reported Not reported Not reported Not reported 2 CEDAR RIVER TRAIL N RIVERSIDE DR RENTON,WA 98055 S105152439 CSCSL $104320342 NIA SHWS: Facility LD:39825723 MTBE Code:Not reported Prog plan code :4 UXO Code :Not reported LaULong :47/122 Responsible Unit:Northwest Region Ecology Site Status relative to the MTCA cleanup process: Independent Remedial Ac5on Independent Site Status -those sites undergoing an independent cleanup: Final Independent Remedial Action Report received WARM Bin Number indicates the outcome of the Washington Ranking Model (WARM): Affected Media Status:S (Suspected)-Due to preliminary investigations or the nature of business operations or manufacturing processes,certain contaminants are suspected to be Not reported Not reported Not reported Not reported Not reported Not reported Suspected to be present Not reported Suspected to be present Not reported Not reported Not reported Not reported Not reported Not reported Not reported present at the site Affected Media :Ground Water Arsenic Code:Not reported Base/Neutral/Acid Organics: Halogenated Organic Compounds: EPA Pdotity Pollutants -Metals and Cyanide: Metals -Other non-ptiodty pollutant medals: Po]ychlodnatad biPhenyls (PCBs): Pesticides: Petroleum Products: Phenolic Compounds: Non-Halogenated Solvents: Dioxin: Polynuclear Aromatic Hydrocarbons (PAH): Reactive Wastes: Corrosive Wastes: Radioactive Wastes: Asbestos: Conventional Contaminants,Organic: TC1575426.1S Page 50 I Map ID Direction Distance Distance (ft.) Elevation Site 11:'::-.-'.#MAP.EINDINGS":.:'-:-!-- CEDAR RIVER TRAIL (Continued) Conventional Contaminants,Inorganic: Method Code : LaULong :47"29"51"/122"12"53" EDR ID Number Database(s)EPA ID Number Not reported 4 $104320342 Facility ID:39825723 M'rBE Code:Not reported Prog plan code :4 UXO Code :Not reported Lat/Long :47 /122 Responsible Unit:Northwest Region Ecology Site Status relative to the MTCA cleanup process: independent Remedial Action [ndependent Site Status -those sites undergoing an independent cleanup: Final Independent Remedial Action Report received WARM Bin Number indicates the outcome of the Washington Ranking Model (WARM): Affected Media Status:C (confirmed)-The presence of hazardous substances above MTCA cleanup levels has been confirmed by laboratory analysis (or field determination in the case of peboleum contamination) Affected Media :Soil Arsenic Code:Not reported Base/Neutral/Acid Organics: Ha[ogenated Organic Compounds: EPA Pdodty Pollutants -Metals and Cyanide: Metals -Other non@dofity pollutant medals:. Polychlorinatad biPhenyls (PCBs): Pesticides: Petroleum Products: Phenolic Compounds: Nort-Halegenated Solvents: Diokin: pclynuclear Aromatic Hydrocarbons (PAH): Reactive Wastes: Corrosive Wastes: Radioactive Wastes: Asbestos: Conventional Contaminants,Organic: Conventional Contaminants,Inorganic: Method Code : LaULong :47"29"51"1122"12"53" 19 ACTION AVIATION INC SW 840 PERIMETER RD W 1/2-1 RENTON,WA 98055 4659 It, Relative: Lower Not reported .Not reported Confirmed above MTCA cleanup levels Not reported Not reported Not reported Confirmed above MTCA cleanup levels Not reported Confirmed above MTCA cleanup levels Not re )orted Not re oded Not re turfed Not re ortod Not re )orted Not re :orted Not re )orted Not re )orted 4 Actual: 18ft. CSCSL $193822445 NIA SHWS: Facility ID:54846481 MTBE Code:Not reported Prog plan code :Not reported UXO Code :Not reported Lat/Long :47/122 Responsible Unit:Northwest Region Ecology Site Status relative to the MTCA cleanup process: Independent Remedial Action Independent Site Status -those sites undergoing an independent cleanup: Not reported WARM Bin Number indicates the outcome of the Washington Ranking Model (WARM): Affected Media Status:S (Suspected)-Due to preliminary investigations or the nature of business operations or manufactudeg processes,certain contaminants are suspected to be TC1575428.1S Page 51 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I . I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I Map ID Direction Distance Distance (ff) Elevation Site h Database(s) ACTION AVIATION INC (Continued) present at the site Affected Media :Ground Water Arsenic Code:Not reported Base/Neutral/Acid Organics:Not reported Halogenated Organic Compounds:Not reported EPA Pdority Pollutants -Metals and Cyanide:Not reported Metals -Other non-priority pollutant medals:Not reported Polychlodnatsd biPbenyls (PCBs):Not reported Pesticides:Not reported Petroleum Products:Suspected to be present Phenolic Compounds:Not reported Non-Halogenatad Solvents:Not reported Dioxin:Not reported Polynuclear Aromatic Hydrocarbons (PAH):Not reported Reactive Wastes:Not reported Corrosive Wastes:Not reported Radioactive Wastes:Not reported Asbestos:Not reported Conventional Contaminants,Organic:Not reported Conventional Contaminants,Inorganic:Not reported Method Code :4 Let]Long :47"29"2"/122°12"39" Facility tO:54846481 MTBE Code:Not reported Prog plan code :Not reported UXO Code :Not reported LaULong :47/122 Responsible Unit:Northwest Region Ecology Site Status relative to the MTCA cleanup process: Independent Remedial Action [ndepondent Site Status -those sites undergoing an independent cleanup: Not reported WARM Bin Number indicates the outcome of the Washington Ranking Model 0NARM): Affected Media Status:S (Suspected)-Due to preliminary investigations or the natare of business operations or manufactudng processes,certain contaminants are suspected to be present atthe site Affected Media :Surface Water Arsenic Code:Not reported Base/Neutral/Acid Organics:Not reported Halogenated Organic Compounds:Not reported EPA Pdotity Pollutants o Metals and Cyanide:Not reported Metals -Other non-pdority pollutant medals:Not reported Polychlodnated biPhenyls (PCBs):Not reported Pesticides:Not reported Petroleum Products:Suspected to be present Phenolic Compounds:Not reported Non-Halogenatad Solvents:Not reported Dioxin:Not reported Polynuclear Aromatic Hydrocarbons (PAH):Not reported Reactive Wastes:Not reported Corrosive Wastes:Not reported Radioactive Wastes:Not reported Asbestos:Not reported •Conventional Contaminants,Organic:Not reported Conventional Contaminants,Inorganic:Not reported Method Code :4 EDR ID Number EPA ID Number $103822445 TC1575426.1s Page 52 Map IO Direction Distance Distance (ft.) Elevation Site ACTION AVIATION INC (Continued) Lat/Long :47"29"2"/122"12"39" Database(s) EDR ID Number EPA IO Number $103822445 Facil!ty ID:54846481 MTBE Code:Not reported Prog plan code :Not reported UXO Code :Not reported Lat/Long :47 /122 Responsthle Unit:Northwest Region Ecology Site Status relative to the MTCA cleanup process: Independent Remedial Action Independent Site Status -those sites undergoing an independent cleanup: Not reported WARM B[n Number indicates the outcome of the Washington Ranking Model (WARM): Affected Media Status:C (Confirmed)-The presence of hazardous substances above MTCA cleanup levels has been confirmed by laboratory analysis (or field determination in the case of petroleum contamination) Affected Media :Soil Arsenic Code:Not reported Base/Neutral/Acid Organics: Halogenated Organic Compounds: EPA priority Pollutants -Metals and Cyanide: Metals -Other non-priority pollutant medals: Polychlorinated biPhenyls (PCBs): Pesticides: Petroleum Products: Phenolic Compounds: Norr-Halogenated Solvents: Dioxin: Polynuclear Aromatic Hydrocarbons (PAH); Reactive Wastes: Coh-osive Wastes: Radioactive Wastes: Asbestos: Conventional Contaminants,Organic: Conventional Contaminants,Inorganic: Method Code : Lat/Long :47"29"2"1 122'12"39" 20 RENTON MUNICIPAL AIRPORT FIRE TRNG AREA SW 616 W PERIMETER RD 1/2-1 RENTON,WA 98055 5046 ft. Relative: Lower Not reported Not reported Not reported Not reported Not reported Not reported Confirmed above MTCA cleanup levels Not reported Not mperted Not reported Not reported Not reported Not reported Not reported Not reported Not reported Not reported 4 Actual: 19ft. RCRA-SQG 1001491244 CSCSL WAR000003335 FINDS RCRAInfo: Owner:FEDERAL AVIATION ADMINISTRATION (206)764-6632 EPA ID:WAROOti003335 Contact:Not reported Classification:Small Quantity Generater TSDF Ac'dvities:Not reported TC15754261s Page 53 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I l I Map ID Direction Distance Distance (tt.) Elevation Site EDR ID Number Database(s)EPA ID Number RENTON MUNICIPAL AIRPORT FIRE TRNG AREA (Continued) Victation Status:No violations found 1001491244 FINDS: Other Pertinent Environmental Activily Identified at Site: RESOURCE CONSERVATION AND RECOVERY ACT INFORMATION SYSTEM WASHINGTON-DEPARTMENT OF ECOLOGY FACILITY/SITE IDENTIFICATION SYSTEM SHWS: Facility ID:20554 MTSE Code:Not reported prog plan code :Not reported UXO Code :Not reported LatlLong :47/122 Responsible Unit:Northwest Region Ecology Site Status relative to the MTCA cieanup process: Independent Remedial Action Independent Site Status -those sites undergoing an independent cleanup: Independent Site Assessment of Intadm Remedial Action Report received WARM Bin Number indicates the outcome of the Washington Ranking Model 0NARM): Affected Media Status:C (ConfiEned)-The presence of hazardous substances above MTCA cieanup levels has been confirmed by laboratory analysis (or field determination in the case of petroleum contamination) Affected Media :Ground Water Arsenic Code:Not reported Base/Neutral/Acid Organics: Halogeoated Organic Compounds: EPA Pdodty Pollutants -Metals and Cyanide: Metals -Other non-pdofity pollutant medals: Polychlodnated biPhenyls (PCSs): Pesticides: Pekoleum Products: Phenolic Compounds: Non-Ha!ogenated Solvents: Dioxin: Polynuclear Aromatic Hydrocarbons (PAH): Reactive Wastes: Corrosive Wastes: Radioactive Wastes: Asbestos: Conventional Contaminants,Organic: Conventional Contaminants,Inorganic: Method Code : LaULong :47"29"29"1122"13"7" Confirmed above MTCA cleanup levels Confirmed above MTCA cleanup [eve[s Not reported Not reported Confirmed above MTCA cleanup tavels Not reported Confirmed above MTCA cleanup levels Not reported Confirmed above MTCA cleanup levels Not reported Not reported Not reported Not reported Not reported Not reported Not reported Not reported 18 Facility ID:20554 MTBE Cede:Not reported prog ptan code :Not reported UXO Cede :Not reported Lat/Long :47 /122 Responsible Unit:Northwest Region Ecology Site Status relative to the MTCA cleanup process: Independent Remedial Action Independent Site Status -those sites undergoing an independent cleanup: Independent Site Assessment of Interim Remedial Action Report received WARM Bin Number indicates the outcome ofthe Washington Ranking Model 0h/ARM): Affected Media Status:C (Confirmed)-The presence of hazardous substances above MTCA cleanup levels has been confirmed by laboratory analysis (or field determination in the case of TC1575426.ts Page 54 Map ID •Direction Distance Distance (ft.) Elevafton Site Database(s) EDR ID Number EPA ID Number RENTON MUNICIPAL AIRPORT FIRE TRNG AREA (Continued) petroleum contamination) Affected Media :Soil Arsenic Code:Not reported .Base/Neutral/Acid Organics:Halogenated Organic Compounds: EPA Pdodty Pollutants -Metals and Cyanide: Metals -Other non-priodty pollutant medals: Polycblorinatad biPhenyls (PCBs): PestiCides: Petroleum Products: Phenolic Compounds: Non-Halogenated Solvents: Dioxin: Polynuclear Aromatic Hydrocarbons (PAH): Reac'dve Wastes: Corrosive Wastes Radioactive Wastes: Asbestos: Conventional Contaminants,Organic: Conventional Contaminants,inorganic: Method Code : Lat/l_ong :47"29"29"1122"13"7" Confrmed above MTCA cleanup levels Confirmed above MTCA cleanup levels Not reported Not reported Confirmed above MTCA cleanup levels Not reported Confirmed above MTCA cleanup levels Not reported Confirmed above MTCA cleanup levels Not re )orted Not re )orted Not re )orted Not re )orted Not re orted Not rE )orted Not r )orted Not r )orted 18 1001491244 TC1575426.1s Page 55 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I i i l 8c z 0 0 u.u,I w 6 z0 Z 00 o ooooo°°°gg go gg °°°°..... w0O0zz •N ° .> J W•= o oo >= l:c 0 m LLI WWO0 0 z 0 00,z004No 00 -,.o=- OmO00 w 0 C Z Z0ttltu w 00--!' - uJ 0 0 ((#0 0 O =ZzoWW=z oW oo oo ....08 o ooo ooooo oo oo oo oo ooZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZ ZZ 0 I I I Code Description DO01 IGNITABLE HAZARDOUS WASTES ARE THOSE WASTES WHICH HAVE A FLASHPOtNT OF LESS THAN 140 DECREES FAHRENHEIT AS DETERMINED BYA PENSKY-MARTENS CLOSED CUP FLASH POINT TESTER.ANOTHER METHOD OF DETERMINING THE FLASH POINT OF A WASTE IS TO REVIEW THE MATERIAL SAFETY DATA SHEET,WHICH CAN BE OBTAINED FROM THE MANUFACTURER OR DISTRIBUTOR OF THE MATERIAL.LACQUER THINNER IS AN EXAMPLE OF A COMMONLY USED SOLVENT WHICH WOULD BE CONSIDERED AS IGNITABLE HAZARDOUS WASTE. D002 A WASTE WHICH HAS A PH OF LESS THAN 2 OR GREATER THAN 12.5 IS CONSIDERED TO BE A CORROSIVE HAZARDOUS WASTE•SODIUM HYDROXIDE,A CAUSTIC SOLUTION WITH A HIGH PH,IS OFTEN USED BY INDUSTRIES TO CLEAN OR DEGREASE PARTS. HYDROCHLORIC ACID,A SOLUTION WITH A LOW PH,IS USED BY MANY INDUSTRIES TO CLEAN METAL PARTS PRIOR TO PAINTING.WHEN THESE CAUSTIC OR ACID SOLUTIONS BECOME CONTAMINATED AND MUST BE DISPOSED,THE WASTE WOULD BE A CORROSIVE HAZARDOUS WASTE• D003 A MATERIAL IS CONSIDERED TO BE A REACTIVE HAZARDOUS WASTE IF IT IS NORMALLY UNSTABLE,REACTS VIOLENTLY WITH WATER,GENERATES TOXIC GASES WHEN EXPOSED TO WATER OR CORROSIVE MATERIALS,OR IF IT IS CAPABLE OF DETONATION OR EXPLOSION WHEN EXPOSED TO HEAT OR A FLAME.ONE EXAMPLE OF SUCH WASTE WOULD BY WASTE GUNPOWDER. D004 D0O5 D006 D007 D008 D009 D010 D011 D018 D028 D029 D035 D039 F002 ARSENIC BARIUM CADMIUM CHROMIUM LEAD MERCURY SELENIUM SILVER BENZENE 1,2-DICHLOROETHANE 1,1-DICHLOROETHYLENE METHYL ETHYL KETONE TETRACHLOROETHYLENE THE FOLLOWING SPENT HALOGENATED SOLVENTS:TETRACHLOROETHYLENE,METHYLENE CHLORIDE,TRICHLOROETHYLENE,1,1,I-TRICHLOROETHANE,CHLOROBENZENE, 1,1,2-TRICHLORO-1,2,2-TRIFLUOROETHANE,ORTHO-DICHLOROBENZENE,TRICHLOROFLUOROMETHANE,AND 1,1,2-TRICHLOROETHANE;ALL SPENT SOLVENT TC1575426.1S -Page EPA-1 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I MIXTURES/BLENDS CONTAINING,BEFORE USE,A TOTAL OF TEN PERCENT OR MORE (BY VOLUME)OF ONE OR MORE OF THE ABOVE HALOGENATED SOLVENTS OR THOSE LISTED IN F001,F004,OR F005,AND STILL BOTFOMS FROM THE RECOVERY OF THESE SPENT SOLVENTS AND SPENT SOLVENT MIXTURES. F003 THE FOLLOWLNG SPENT NON-HALOGENATED SOLVENTS:XYLENE,ACETONE,ETHYL ACETATE,ETHYL BENZENE,ETHYL ETHER,METHYL ISOBUTYL KETONE,N-BUTYL ALCOHOL,CYCLOHEXANONE,AND METHANOL;ALL SPENT SOLVENT MIXTURES/BLENDS CONTAINING,BEFORE USE,ONLY THE ABOVE SPENT NON-HALOGENATED SOLVENTS;AND ALL SPENT SOLVENT MIXTURES/BLENDS CONTAINING,BEFORE USE,ONE OR MORE OF.THE ABOVE NON-HALOGENATED SOLVENTS,AND,A TOTAL OF TEN PERCENT OR MORE (BY VOLUME)OF ONE OR MORE OF THOSE SOLVENTS LISTED IN F001,F002,F004,AND F005,AND STILL BOTFOMS FROM THE RECOVERY OF THESE SPENT SOLVENTS AND SPENT. SOLVENT MIXTURES. F005 THE FOLLOWING SPENT NON-HALOGENATED SOLVENTS:TOLUENE,METHYL ETHYL KETONE, CARBON DISULFIDE,ISOBUTANOL,PYRIDINE,BENZENE,2-ETHOXYETHANOL,AND2-NITROPROPANE;ALL SPENT SOLVENT MIXTURES/BLENDS CONTAINING,BEFORE USE,A TOTAL OF TEN PERCENT OR MORE (BY VOLUME)OF ONE OR MORE OF THE ABOVE NON-HALOGENATED SOLVENTS OR THOSE SOLVENTS LISTED IN F001,F002,OR F004; AND STILL BO'FrOMS FROM THE RECOVERY OF THESE SPENT SOLVENTS AND SPENT SOLVENT MIXTURES. F006 WASTEWATER TREATMENT SLUDGES FROM ELECTROPLATING OPERATIONS EXCEPT FROM THE FOLLOWING PROCESSES:(1)SULFURIC ACID ANODIZING OF ALUMINUM;(2)TIN PLATING ON CARBON STEEL;(3)ZINC PLATING (SEGREGATED BASIS)ON CARBON STEEL;(4)ALUMINUM OR ZINC-ALUMINUM PLATING ON CARBON STEEL;(5) CLEANING/STRIPPING ASSOCIATED WITH TiN,ZINC AND ALUMINUM PLATING ON CARBON STEEL;AND (6)CHEMICAL ETCHING AND MILLING OF ALUMINUM. F007 SPENT CYANIDE PLATING BATH SOLUTIONS FROM ELECTROPLATING OPERATIONS F019 WASTEWATER TREATMENT SLUDGES FROM THE CHEMICAL CONVERSION COATING OF ALUMINUM EXCEPT FROM ZIRCONIUM PHOSPHATiNG IN ALUMINUM CAN WASHING WHEN SUCH PHOSPHATING IS AN EXCLUSIVE CONVERSION COATING PROCESS. P098 P098 P106 P106 U019 U080 U080 U159 U159 POTASSIUM CYANIDE POTASSIUM CYANIDE K(CN) SODIUM CYANIDE SODIUM CYANIDE NA(CN) BENZENE (I,T) METHANE,DICHLORO- METHYLENE CHLORIDE 2-BUTANONE (I,T) METHYL ETHYL KETONE (MEK)(I,T) TC1575426.1s -Page EPA-2 I Code 0220 U220 U226 U226 Descdpon BENZENE,METHYL- TOLUENE ETHANEII,I,I-TRICHLORO- METHYLCHLOROFORM TC1575426.1s -Page EPA-3 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I To maintain currencyof the following federal and state databases,EDR contacts the appropdate governmental agency on a monthly or quarterly basis,as required. Number of Days to Update:Provides confirmation that this EDR report meets or exceeds the 90[ay updating requirement of the ASTM standard, FEDERAL RECORDS NPL:National Pdodty List National Pdodties List (Superfund).The NPL is a subset ofCERCLIS and identifies over 1,200 sites for pdodty cleanup under the Superfund Program.NPL sites may encompass relatively [arge areas.As such,EDR provides polygon coverage for over 1,000 NPL site boundades produced by EPA's Environmental Photographic Interpretation Center (EPIC)and regional EPA offices. Date of Government Version:07/01/05 Source:EPA Date Data Arrived at EDR:11102/05 Telephone:N/A Date Made Active in Reports:12/07/05 Last EDR Contact:11/02/05 Number of Days to Update:35 Next Scheduled EDR Contact:01130106 [3ata Release Frequency:Quarterly NPL Site Boundaries Sources: EPA's Environmental Photographic Interpretation Center (EPIC) Telephone:202-564-7333 EPA Region 1 EPA Region 6 Telephone 617-918-1143 Telephone:21456659 EPA Region 3 EPA Region 8 Telephone 215-814-5418 Telephone:303-312-6774 EPA Region 4 Telephone 404-562-8033 Proposed NPL:Proposed National Pdority List Sites Date of Government Version:04/27105 Source:EPA Date Data Arrived at EDR:11/02/05 Telephone:N/A Date Made Active in Reports:1 2/07105 Last EDR Contact:11/02/05 Number of Days to Update:35 Next Scheduled EDR Contact:01130106 Data Release Frequency:Quartedy DELISTED NPL:National Pdodty List Deletions The National Oil and Hazardous Substances Pollugon Contingency Plan (NCP)establishes the cdteda that the EPA uses to delete sites from the NPL.In accordance with 40 CFR 300.425.(e),sites may be deleted from the NPL where no further response is appropriate. Date of Government Version:07101105 Source:EPA Date Data Arrived at EDR:11102/05 Telephone:N/A Date Made Active in Reports:12/07/05 Last EDR Contact:11/02/05 Number of Days to Update:35 Next Scheduled EDR Contact:01/30/06 Data Release Frequency:Quarterly NPL LIENS:Federal Superfund Liens Federal Superfund Liens.Under the authority granted the USEPA by the Comprehensive Environmental Response,Compensation and Liability Act (CERCI-&)of 1980,the USEPA has the authorityto file liens against real property in order to recover remedial action expenditures or when te property owner receives notification of potential liability. USEPA compiles a [istieg of filed notices of Superfund Liens. TC1575426.1s Page GR-1 •i Date of Government Version:10/15/91 Date Data Arrived at EDR:02/02/94 Date Made Active in Reports:03130194 Number of Days to Update:56 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I Source:EPA Telephone:202-564267 Last EDR Contact:08/22/05 Next Scheduled EDR Contact:11/21/05 Data Release Frequency:No Update Planned CERCLIS:Comprehensive Environmental Response,Compensation,and Uability Information System CERCLIS contains data on potantially hazardous waste sites that have been reported to the USEPA by states,municipali6es, pdvata companies and pHvata persons,pursuantto Sectfon 103 of the Comprehensive Environmental Response,Compensation, and Liability Act (CERCLA).CERCLIS contains sites which are either proposed to or on the NationaI.Pdorities List (NPL)and sites which are in the screening and assessment phase for possible inclusion on the NPL. Date of Government Version:09119/05 Source:EPA Date Data Arrived at EDR:10/21/05 Telephone:703-413-0223 Date Made Active in Reports:10/27/05 Last EDR Contact:10/21/05 Number of Days to Update:6 Next Scheduled EDR Contact:12/19/05 Data Release Frequency:Quartedy CERCUS-NFRAP:CERCLIS No Further Remedial Action Planned As of February 1995,CERCUS sites designated "No Further Remedtel Action Ptenned"(NFRAP)have been removed from CERCLIS.NFRAP sites may be sites where,following an initial investigation,no contamination was found, contamination was removed quickly without the need for the site to be placed on the NPL,or the contamination was not sedous enough to require Federal Superfund action or NPL consideration.EPA has removed approximately 25,000 NFRAP sites th I the unintended barriers to the redevelopment of these properties and has archived them as histodcal records so EPA does not needlessly repeat the investigations in the futhre.This policychange is part of the EPA's Brownfelds Redevelopment program to help cities,states,pdvate investors and affected czens to promote economic redevelopment of unproductive urban sites. Date ofGovernment Version:08/22/05 Source:EPA Date Date Arrived at EDR:09120/05 Telephone:703-413-0223 Date Made Achve in Reports:10/27/05 Last EDR Contact:09120105 Number of Days to Update:37 Next Scheduled EDR Contact:12/19105 Data Release Frequency:Quartedy CORRACTS:Comective Action Report CORRACTS identifies hazardous waste handlers with RCRA corrective action activity. Data of GovernmentVersion:10113/05 Source:EPA Date Data Arrived at EDR:10/27/05 Telephone:800-424-9346 Date Made Active in Reports:12/07/05 Last EDR Contact:09/06/05 Number o1 Days to Update:41 Next Scheduled EDR Contact:01116/06 Data Release Frequency:Quarterly RCRA:Resource Conservation and Recovery Act Information TC1575426.1s Page GR-2 ! I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I RCRAInfo is EPA's comprehensive infomlation system,providing access to data supporting the Resource Conservation • and Recovery Act (RCRA)of 1976 and the Hazardous and Solid Waste Amendments (HSWA)of 1984.RCRAInfo replaces the data recording and reporting abilities of the Resource Conservation and Recovery Information System (RCRIS). The database incJudes selective information on sites which genenate,transport,store,teat and/or dispose of hazardous waste as detined by the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA).Condi0onally exempt small quantity generators (CESQGs)generate less than 100 kg of hazardous waste,or less than 1 kg of acutely hazardous waste per month.Small quantity generators (SQGs)generate between 100 kg and 1,000 kg of hazardous waste per month.Large quantity generators (LQGs)generate over 1,000 kilograms (kg)of hazardous waste,or over I kg of acutaly hazardous waste per month.Transporters are individuals or entities that move hazardous waste from the generator off-sita to a facility that can recycle,treat,store,or dispose of the waste.TSDFs treat,store, or dispose of the waste. Date of Government Version:10/14/05 Source:EPA Date Data Ardved at EDR:10127/05 Telephone:800-424-9346 Date Made Active in Reports:12/67/05 Last EDR Contact:10127105 Number of Days to Update:41 Next Scheduled EDR Contact:12/26/05 Data Release Frequency:Quartedy ERNS:Emergency Response Notification System Emergency Response Notification System.ERNS records and stores information on reported releases of oil and hazardous substances. Date of Government Version:12/31/04 Source:National Response Center,United States Coast Guard Date Data Arrived at EDR:01/27/05 Telephone:202-260-2342 Date Made Active in Reports:03124/05 Last EDR Contact:61127105 Number of Days to Update:56 Next Scheduled EDR Contact:10124105 Data Release Frequency:Annualty HMIRS:Hazardous Matada[s Information Reporting System Hazardous Materials Incident Report System.HMIRS contains hazardous matedat spill incidents reported to DOT. Date of Government Version:06/27105 Source;U.S.Department of Transportation Date Data Arrived at EDR:10118105 Telephone:202-366556 Date Made Active in Reports:12/07/05 Last EDR Contact:10/18/05 Number of Days to Update:50 Next Scheduled EDR Contact:01/16/06 Data Release Frequency:Annually US ENG CONTROLS:Engineedng Controls Sites List A listing of sites with engineering controls in place.Engineering controts include various form.S of caps,building foundations,liners,and treatment methods to create pathway elimination for regulated substances to enter environmental media or effect human health. Date of Government Version:08102/05 Source:Environmental Protection Agency Date Data Arrived at EDR:08/12/05 Telephone:703-603-8867 Date Made Active in Reports:10/06/05 Last EDR Contact:07/05/05 Number of Days to Update:55 Next Schedu[ed EDR Contact:01102/06 Data Release Frequency:Varies US INST CONTROL:Sites with Institutional Controls A listing of sites with institutional controls in place.Institutional controls include administrative measures, such as groundwater use restrictions,construction restrictions,property use restrictions,and post remediation care requirements intended to prevent exposure to contaminants remaining on slta.Deed resthctions are generally required as part of the institutional controls. Date of Government Version:01110165 Source:Environmental Protection Agency Date Data Arnved at EDR:02/11/05 Telephone:763-663-8867 Date Made Active in Reports:04/06105 Last EDR Contact:01/03/05 Number of Days to Update:54 Next Scheduled EDR Contact:10/03/05 Data Release Frequency:Vades TC1575426.1s Page GR*3 i I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I DOD:Deparfnent of Defense Sites This data set consists offederally owned or administered lands,administered by the Department of Defense,that have any area equal to or greater than 640 acres of the United States,Puerto Rico,and the U.S.Virgin tstsnds. Date of Govemment Version:10101103 Source:USGS Date Data Arrived at EDR:11/12/03 Telephone:703-692-8801 Date Made Active in Reports:11/21/03 Last EDR Contact:08/09/05 Number of Days to Update:9 Next Schedu[ed EDR Contact:11107105 Data Release Frequency:Semi-Annually FUDS:Formerly Used Defense Sites The listing includes locations of Formerly Used Defense Sites properties where the US Army Corps of Engineers is actively working or will take necessary cleanup actions. Date of Government Version:1 2/31104 Source:U.S.Army Corps of Engineers Date Data Arrived at EDR:06/29105 Telephone:202-528-4285 Date Made Active in Reports:08/08105 Last EDR Contact:06/29105 Number of Days to Update:40 Next Scheduled EDR Contact:10103105 Data Release Frequency:Vades US BROWNFIELDS:A Listing of Brownfields Sites Included in the listing are brownfields properties addresses by Cooperative Agreement Recipients and brownflelds properties addressed by Targeted Brewnfields Assessments.Targeted Browntields Assessmenta-EPA's Targeted Brownflelds Assessments (TBA)program is designed to help states,bes,and municipalities-especially those without EPA Brownfields Assessment Demonstration Pilota-minimize the uncertainties of contamination often associated with brownfields.Under the TBA program,EPA provides funding and/or technical assistance for environmental assessments at brownflelds sites throughout the country.Targeted Brownfields Assessments supplement and work with other efforts under EPA*s Brownflelds Initiative to promote cleanup and redevelopment of brownflelds.Cooperative Agreement Recipienta-States,politfual subdivisions,tertttodes,and Indian tbes become Brewnfields Cleanup Revolving Loan Fund (BCRLF)cooperative agreement recipients when they enter into BCRLF cooperative agreements with the U.S.EPA.EPA selects BCRLF cooperative agreement recipients based on a proposal and application process.BCRLF •cooperative agreement recipients must use EPA funds provided through BCRLF cooperative agreement for specified brownfields-related cleanup activities. Date of Government Version:08/18/05 Source:Environmental Protection Agency Date Data Aived at EDR:08/18105 Tetsphone:202-566-2777 Date Made Active in Reports:10106/05 Last EDR Contact:08/11/05 Number of Days to Update:49 Next Scheduled EDR Contact:12/12/05 Data Release Frequency:Semi-Annually CONSENT:Superfund (CERCLA)Consent Decrees Major legal settlements that establish responsibiflty and standards for cleanup at NPL (Superfund)sites.Released pafiodically by United States District Courts after settlement by parties to iftigation matters. Date of Government Version:12/14/04 Source:Department of Justice,Consent Decree Library Date Data Ardved at EDR:02/15105 Telephone:Varies Date Made Active in Reports:04/25105 Last EDR Contact:01127105 Number of Days to Update:69 Next Scheduled EDR Contact:10124105 Data Release Frequency:Varies ROD:Records OfDecision Record of Decision.ROD documents mandate a permanent remedy at an NPL (Superfund)site containing technical and health information to aid in the cleanup. Date of Government Version:06108/05 Source:EPA Date Data Arrived at EDR:10/20/05 Telephone:703-416-6223 Date Made Active in Reports:12/07105 Last EDR Contact:10/06/05 Number of Days to Update:48 Next Scheduled EDR Contact:01102/06 Data Reiesse Frequency:Annually TC1575426.1s Page GR-4 I I I1i GOVERN M EN RECO RDS?SE RGH EDJDTA CU RNGT/NF,! I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I UMTRA:Uranium Mill Tailings Sites Uranium ore was mined by pdvata companies for federal government use in national defense programs.When the mills shut down,large piles of the sand-like matedal (mill railings)remain after uranium has been extracted from the ore.Levels of human exposure fa radioactive matadals from the piles are low;however,in some cases failings were used as construction matadals before the potential health hazards ofthe tailings were recognized.In 1978, 24 inactive uranium mill railings sites in Oregon,Idaho,Wyoming,Utah,Coloredo,New Mexico,Texas,North Dakota, South Dakota,Pennsylvania,and on Navajo and Hopi tribal lands,were targeted for cleanup by the Depaent of Energy. Date of Government Version:12/29/04 Source:Department of Energy Date Data Arrived at EDR:01107105 Telephone:505-845)011 Date Made Activein Reports:03114105 Last EDR Contact:12/21/04 Number of Days to Update:66 Next Scheduled EDR Contact:12119105 Data Retaase Frequency:Vades ODh Open Dump InventoryAnopendumpisdefined as a disposal facility that does not comply with one or more of the Part 257 or Part 258 Subtitle D Criteria. Date of Government Version:06/30/85 Source:Environmental Protection Agency Date Data Arrived at EDR:08/09104 Telephone:80024-9346 Date Made Active in.Reports:09/17/04 Last EDR Contact:05123/95 Number of Days to Update:39 Next Scheduled EDR Contact:N/A Data Release Frequency:No Update Planned TRIS:Toxic Chemical Release Inventory System Toxic Release Inventory System.TRIS identifies facilities which release toxic chemicals to the air,water and land in reportable quantities under SARA Title III Secdon 313. Date of Government Version:12/31/03 Source:EPA Date Data Arrived at EDR:07113105 Telephone:202-566-0250 Date Made Active in Reports:08117105 Last EDR Contact:07/13/05 Number of Days to Update:35 Next Scheduled EDR Contact:12/19/05 Data Release Frequency:Annually TSCA:Toxic Substances Control Act Toxic Substances Control Act.TSCA identifies manufacturers and importers of chemical substances included on the TSCA Chemical Substance Inventory list.It includes data on the production volume of these substances by ptant site. Date of Government Version:12/31/02 Date Data Arrived at EDR:04127104 Date Made Active in Reports:05121104 Number of Days to Update:24 Source:EPA Telephone:202-260-5521 Last EDR Contact:07118105 Next Scheduled EDR Contact:10117105 Data Release Frequency:Every 4 Years FTTS:FIFPJV TSCA Tracking System -FIFRA (Federal Insecticide,Fungicide,&Rodenticide Act)/TscA (Toxic Substances Control Act) FITS tracks administrative cases and pesticide enforcement aons and compliance activities related to FIFRA, TSCA and EPCRA (Emergency Planning and Community Right-to-Know Act).To maintain cun'ency,EDR contacts the Agency on a quarterly basis. Date of Government Version:07/15/05 Date Data Anved at EDR:07/25/05 Date Made Active in Reports:08/22/05 Number of Days to Update:28 Source:EPNOti]ce of Prevention,Pesticides and Toxic Substances Telephone:202-566-1667 Last EDR Contact:06120/05 Next Scheduled EDR Contact:12/19/05 Data Release Frequency:Quartedy FTTS INSP:F[FRN TSCA Tracking System -FIFRA (Federal Insecticide,Fungicide,&Redenticide Act)/TSCA (Toxic Substances Control Act) TC1575426.1s Page GR-5 i -:"........:.............................:'-',::[I ""KING".:-,GOVERN MENT:RECORDSS EARGH ED :DTA ..EN CY!.:TjC:_:__::.::,,: I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I Date of GovemmentVersion:07/15/05 Date Data Arrived at EDR:07125/05 Date Made Ac0ve in Reports:08/22/05 Number of Days to Update:28 Source:EPA Telephone:202-566-1667 Last EDR Contact:06/20/05 Next Scheduted EDR Contact:12/19/05 Data Release Frequency:Quarterly SSTS:Section 7 Tracking Systems Section 7 of the Federal Insecticide,Fungicide and Rodenticide Act,as amended (92 Stat.829)requires all registered pesticide-producing establishments to submit a report to the Environmental Protaction Agency by March 1 st each year.Each establishment must report the types and amounts of pesticides,active ingredients and devices being produced,and those having been produced and sold or distributed in the past year. Date of Government Version:12/31/03 Source:EPA Date Data Arrived at EDR:01/03/05 Telephone:202-564-4203 Date Made Active in Reports:01/25/05 Last EDR Contact:1t/29/04 Number of Days to Update:22 Next Scheduled EDR Contact:10/17/05 Data Release Frequency:Annually PADS:PCB Actlvify Database System PCB Ac0vity Database.PADS Identities generators,transporters,commercial sfarers and/or brokers and disposers of PCB'a who are required to notify the EPA of such activities. Data of Government Version:08/30/05 Source:EPA Date Data Arrived at EDR:09/15/05 Telephone:202-564-3887 Date Made Active in Reports:10/27/05 Last EDR Contact:09113105 Number of Days to Update:44 Next Scheduled EDR Contact:11/07/05 Data Release Frequency:Annually MLTS:Matedal Licensing Tracking System MLTS is maintained by the Nuclear Regulatory Commission and contains a list of appmximataly 8.100 sites which possess or use radioactive materials and which are subject to NRC licensing requirements.To maintain currency, EDR contacts the Agency on a quarterly basis. Date of Government Version:07114/05 Source:Nuclear Regulatory Commission Date Data Arrived at EDR:07122/05 Telephone:30115-7169 Date Made Active in Reports:08/22/05 "Last EDR Contact:07105105 Number of Days to Update:31 Next Scheduled EDR Contact:10103/05 Data Release Fquency:Quartedy MINES:Mines Master Index File Contains all mine identitication numbers issued far mines active or opened since 1971.The data also includes violation information. Date of Govemmeet Version:08/12i05 Source:Department of Labor,Mine Safety and Health Administration Date Data Ardved at EDR:09127105 Tefaphone:303-231-5959 Date Made Active in Reports:11114/05 Last EDR Contact:09/27105 Number of Days to Updata:48 Next Scheduted EDR Contact:12/26/05 Data Release Frequency:Semi-Annually FINDS:Facility Index Systern/Facllity Registry System Facility Index System.FINDS contains both facility information and 'pointers'to other sources that contain more detail.EDR incledes the fo[fawing FINDS databases in this report:PCS (Permit Compliance System),AIRS (Aerometdc Information Retrieval System),DOCKET (Enforcement Docket used to manage and back information on civil judicial enforcement cases for all environmental statutes),FURS (Federal Underground Injection Control),C-DOCKET (Cdminal Docket Systsm used to track edmina]enforcement actions for all environmental statutes),FFIS (FederaI Facilities Information System),STATE (State Environmental Laws and Statutes),and PADS (PCB Actk,ity Data System). Date of Government Version:09/29/05 Source:EPA Date Data Arred at EDR:10/04/05 Telephone:N/A Date Made Active in Reports:11114/05 Last EDR Contact:08129/05 Number of Days to Update:41 Next Scheduled EDR Contact:01102/06 Data Release Frequency:Quartedy TC1575426.1S Page GR-6 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I RAATS:RCRA Administrative Action Tracking System RCRA Administration Actfon Tracking System.RAATS contains records based on enforcement actions issued under RCRA pertaining to major violators and includes administrative and civil actions brought by the EPA.For administration actions after September 30,1995,data entry in the RAATS database was discontinued.EPA will retain a copy of the database for histedcal records.It was necessary to terminate RAATS because a decrease in agency resources made it impossible to continue to update the information contained in the database. Date of Government Version:04117195 Source:EPA Date Data Ardved at EDR:07103195 Telephone:202-564104 'Date Made Active in Reports:08/07/95 Last EDR Contact:09/06105 Number of Days to Update:35 Next Scheduled EDR Contact:12/05/05 Data Release Frequency:No Update Planned BRS:Biennial Reporting SystemTheBiennialReportingSystem is a nagonal system administered by the EPA that collects data on the generation and management of hazardous waste.BRS captures detailed data from two groups:Large Quantity Generators (LQG) and Treatment,Storage,and Disposal Facilities. DateofGovemment Version:12/31/03 Source:EPNNT[S Date Data Anved at EDR:06/17/05 Telephone:800-424-9346 Date Made Active in Reports:08/04105 Last EDR Contact:06/17/05 Number of Days to Update:48 Next Scheduled EDR Contact:12/12/05 Data Release Frequency:Biennially STATE AND LOCAL RECORDS CSCSL:Confirmed &Suspected Contaminated Sites List State Hardous Waste S[tas.State hazardous waste site records are the states'equwalent to CERCLIS.These sdes may or may not already be listed on the federal CERCLIS list.Pdority sites planned for cleanup using state funds (state equivalent of Superfund)are identified along with sites where cleanup will be paid for by potenfiaity responsible parties.Available information vades by state. Date of Government Version:07/05/05 Source:Department of Ecology Date Data Arrived at EDR:08/17/05 Telephone:360-407-7200 Date Made Active in Reports:09113105 Last EDR Contact:08/17/05 Number of Days to Update:27 Next Scheduled EDR Contact:11/14/05 Data Release Frequency:Semi-Annualty HSL:Hazardous Sites List The Hazardous Sites List is a subset of the CSCSL Report.It includes sites which have been assessed and ranked using the Washington Ranking Method (WARM). Date of Government Version:08/24/05 Source:Department of Ecology Date Data Arrived at EDR:69121105 Telephone:360-407-7200 Date Made Active in Reports:10113/05 Last EDR Contact:09/09/05 Number of Days to Update:22 Next Scheduled EDR Contact:12/05/05 Data Release Frequency:Semi-Annualty CSCSL NFA:Confirmed &Contaminated Sites -No Further Action The data set contains information about sites previously on the Confirmed and Suspected Contaminated Sites list that have received a No Further Action (NFA)determination.Because it is necessary to maintain histadca[records of sites that have been investigated and cleaned up,sites are not deleted from the database when cleanup activities are completed.Instead,a No Further Action code is entered based upon the type of NFA determination the site received. Date of Government Version:07105105 Source:Department of Ecology Date Data Anved at EDR:08/17105 Telephone:360-407-7170 Date Made Acfive in Reports:09/13105 Last EDR Contact:08117/05 Number of Days to Update:27 Next Scheduled EDR Contact:11/14/05 Data Release Frequency:Semi-Annualty TC1575426.1s Page GR-7 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I SWF/LF:Solid Waste Facility Database Solid Waste Facilities/Landfill Sites.SWF/LF type records typically contain an inventory of solid waste disposal factiies or landfills in a particularstate.Depending on the state,these may be active or inactive facilities or open dumps that failed to meet RCRA Subtitle D Section 4004 edteda for solid waste landfills or disposal sites. Date of Government Version:10/01/04 Source:Department of Ecology Date Data Arrived at EDR:01106/05 Telephone:360-407-6132 Date Made Ac0ve in Reports:02/02/05 Last EDR Contact:01/05/05 Number of Days to Update:27 Next Scheduled EDR Contact:10103/05 Data Release Frequency:Annually LUST:Leaking Underground Storage Tanks Site List Leaking Underground Storage Tank Incident Reports.LUST records contain an inventory of reported leaking underground storage tank incidents.Not atl states maintain these records,and the information stored vaties by state. Date of Government Version:07105105 Source:Department of Ecology Date Data Arrived at EDR:07/13/05 Telephone:360.407-7200 Date Made Active in Reports:06/11/05 Last EDR Contact:07/13/05 Number of Days to Update:29 Next Scheduled EDR Contact:12/12/05 Data Release Frecluency:Quartedy UST:Underground Storage Tank Database Registered Underground Storage Tanks.UST's are regulated under Subtitle I of the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA)and must be registered with the state department responsible for administering the UST program.Available information vades by state program. Data of Govemment Version:07/11/05 Source:Department of Ecology Date Data Arrived at EDR:07/13/05 Telephone:360.407o7170 Date Made Active in Reports:06/11/05 Last EDR Contact:07113105 Number of Days to Update:29 Next Scheduled EDR Contact:12/12/05 Data Release Frequency:Quarterly AST:Abovoground Storage Tank Locations A listing of aboveground storage tank locations regulated by the Department of Ecology's Spill Prevention,Preparedness and Response Program. Data of Government Version:09/01/05 Source:Department of Ecology Date Data Anved at EDR:09102/05 Telephone:360-407-7562 Date Made Active in Reports:09128/05 Last EDR Contact:08/29/05 Number of Days to Update:26 Next Scheduled EDR Contact:11/28/05 Data Release Frequency:Vades SPILLS:Reported Spills Spills reported to the Spill Prevention,Preparedness and Response Division. Date of Government Version:09108/05 Source:Department of Ecology Date Data Arrived at EDR:09121105 Telephone:360-407-7450 Date Made Active in Reports:11109105 Last EDR Contact:09121105 Number of Days to Update:49 Next Scheduled E[)R Contact:01102/06 Data Release Frequency:Semi-Annually INST CONTROL:Institutional Control Site List Sites that have institutional controls. Date of Government Version:09107/05 Date Data Amved at EDR:09109/05 Date Made Active in Reports:10/25/05 Number of Days to Update:46 Source:Department of Ecology Telephone:360-407-7170 Last EDR Contact:09/06/05 Next Scheduled EDR Contact:12/06/05 Data Release Frequency:Varies TC1575426.1s Page GR-6 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I VCP:Voluntary Cleanup Program Sites Sites that have entered either the Voluntary Cleanup Program or its predecessor Independent Remedial Action program. Date of Govemment Version:07105105 Source:Department of Ecology Date Data Amved at EDR:08/17/05 Telephone:369.407-7200 Date Made Active in Reports:09/13/05 Last EDR Contact:08/17/05 Number of Days to Update:27 Next Scheduled EDR Contact:11/14/05 Data Release Frequency:Vades ICR:Independent Cteanup Reports These are remedial action reports Ecology has received from either the owner or operator of the sites.These actions have been conducted without department oversight or approval and are not under an order or decree.This database is no longer updated by the Department of Ecology. Data of GovemmentVersion:12/01/02 Source:Department of Ecology Date Data An'k,ed at EDR:01103103 Telephone:360-407-7200 Date Made Active in Reports:01122/03 Last EDR Contact:08/16/05 Number of Days to Update:19 Next Scheduled EDR Contact:11/14/05 Data Release Frequency:No Update Planned DRYCLEANERS:Drycleaner List A listing of registered drycleaners who registered with the Department of Ecology (using the SIC code of 7215 and 7216)as hazardous waste generators• Date of Government Version:08116105 Source:Department of Ecology Date Data Anved at EDR:08/17/05 Telephone:360-407-6732 Date Made Active in Reports:09/13/05 Last EDR Contact:08/15/05 Number of Days to Update:27 Next Scheduled EDR Contact:11/14/05 Data Release Frequency:Varies CDL:Clandestine Drug Lab Contaminated Site List Illegal methamphetamine labs use hazardous chemicals that create public health hazards.Chemicals and residues can cause bums,respiratory and neurological damage,and death.Biologicat hazards associated with intravenous needles,feces,and blood also pose health risks. Date of Government Version:08/11/05 Source:Department of Health Date Data Anived at EDR:09/08/05 Telephone:360-236-3380 Date Made Active in Reports:10/13/05 Last EDR Contact:09/08/05 Number of Days to Update:35 Next Scheduled EDR Contact:12/05/05 Data Release Frequency:Vades EMI:Washington Emissions Data System Date of Government Version:12/31/03 Date Data Arrived at EDR:01/18/05 Date Made Active in Reports:03/04/05 Number of Days to Update:45 TRIBAL RECORDS Source:Department of Ecelogy Telephone:360407-6040 Last EDR Contact:01/18/05 Next Scheduled EDR Contact:10117/05 Data Release Frequency:Annually INDIAN RESERV:Indian Reservations This map layer portrays Indian administered lands of the United States that have any area equal to or greater than 640 acres. Date of Government Version:10/01/03 Source:USGS Date Data Arrived at EDR:11/12/03 Telephone:202-208-3710 Date Made Active in Reports:11/21/03 Last EDR Contact:08109/05 Number of Days to Update:9 Next Scheduled EDR Contact:11/07/05 Data Release Frequency:Semi-Annually TC1575426.1s Page GR-9 ..,.:.GOVERNMENT:RECORDS SEARCH ED[;DATCUR_E::!G;:;::;i I I I I I ! I I I I I I I I I I I I I INDIAN LUST:Leaking Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land LUSTs on Indian land in Alaska,Idaho,Oregon and Washington. DataofGovemment Version:09/07/05 Source:EPA Region 10 Date Data Arved at EDR:09108/05 Telephone:206-553-2857 Date Made Active in Reports:10/25/05 Last EDR Contact:08/25105 Number of Days to Update:47 Next Scheduled EDR Contact:11/21/05 Data Release Frequency:Varies INDIAN UST:Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land Date of Government Version:09/07/05 Source:EPA Region 10 Date Data Arrived at EDR:09/08/05 Telephone:206-553-2857 Date Made Active in Reports:10/25/05 Last EDR Contact:08/25105 Number of Days to Update:47 Next Scheduled EDR Contact:11/21/05 Data Release Frequency:Varies COUNTY RECORDS KING COUNTY: Abandoned Landfill Study in King County The King County Abandoned Landfill Survey was conducted from October through December 1984 by the Health Department's Environmental Health Ovision at the requestof the King County Council.The primaP/objective of the survey was to determine if any public health problems existed at the predetermined 24 sites• Date of Government Version:04130185 Source:Seaffie-King County Department of Public Health Date Data Arrived at EDR:11/07/94 Telephone:206-296-4785 Date Made Active in Reports:N/A Last EDR Contact:10121194 Number of Days to Update:47 Next Scheduled EDR Contact:N/A Data Release Frequency:No Update Planned SEAI-I'LE COUNTY: Abandoned Landfill Study in the City of Seattle The Seaffie Abandoned Landfill Survey was conducted in June and Jury of 1984 by the Health Deparent's Environmental Health Division at the request of the Mayor's Office.The pdmary objective ofthe survey was to determine if any public health problems existed at the predetermined 12 sites. Date of Government Version:07130184 Source:Seattle -King County Department of Public Health Date Data Anived at EDR:11/07/94 Telephone:206-296-4785 Date Made Active in Reports:N/A Last EDR Contact:10/21/94 Number of Days to Update:47 Next Scheduled EDR Contact:N/A Data Release Frequency:No Update Planned SEATFLE/KING COUNTY:. Seattle -King County Abandoned Landfill Toxicity I Hazard Assessment Project This report presents the Sea.e-King County Health Department's follow-up investigation of two city owned and four county owned abandoned landfills which was conducted from FebnJary to December 1986. Data of Government Version:12/31/86 Source:Department of Public Health Date Data Arrived at EDR:08/18/95 Telephone:206-296785 Date Made Acgve In Reports:09/20/95 Last EDR Contact:08/14195 Number of Days to Update:33 Next Scheduled EDR Contact:N/A Data Release Frequency:No Update Planned TC1575426.1s Page GR-10 I I I I I i I I I I SNOHOMISH COUNTY: Solid Waste Sites of Record at Snohomish Health District Date of Government Version:02/28105 Source:Snohomish Health Distdct Date Data Arved at EDR:04/28/05 Telephone:206-339-5250 Date Made Active in Reports:05/26105 Last EDR Contact:04/21/05 Number of Days to Update:28 Next Scheduled EDR Contact:10117/05 Data Release Frequency:Semi-Annually TACOMA/PIERCE COUNTY: Closed Landfill Survey Following numerous requests for information about closed dumpsitas and landfills in Pierce Count,the Tacoma-Pierce County Health Department decided to conduct a study on the matter.The aim of the study was to evaluate public health dsks associated with the closed dumpsitas and landfills,and to determine the need,ifany,for further invesggafions of a more detailed nature.The sites represent all of the known dumpsitas and landfills closed after 1950. Date of Government Version:09101102 Source:Tacoma-Pierce County Health Department Date Data Arrived at EDR:03124103 Telephone:206-591500 Date Made Active in Reports:05/14/03 Last EDR Contact:03/19/03 Number of Days to Update:51 Next Scheduled EDR Contact:N/A Data Release Frequency:No Update Planned EDR PROPRIETARY HISTORICAL DATABASES Former Manufactured Gas (Coal Gas)Sites:The existence and location of Coal Gas sites is provided exclusively to EDR by Real Property Scan,Inc.Copydght 1993 Real propetty Scan,Inc.For a technical description of the types of hazards which may be found at such sites,contact your EDR customer service representative. i I Disclaimer Provided by Real Property Scan,Inc. he information contained in this report has predominantly been obtained om publicly availabta sources produced by enUt[es other than Real Property Scan.While reasonable steps have been taken to insure the accuracy of this report,Real Property Scan does not guarantee the accuracy of this report.Any liability on the part of Real Property Scan is stcfiy limited to a refund of the amount paid.No claim is made for the actual existence of toxins at any site.This report does not constitute a legal opinion. I ! I I •1 I I OTHER DATABASE(S) Depending on the geographic area covered by this report,the data provided in these specialty databases may or may not be completa.For example,the existence ofwefiands information data in a specific report does not mean that all wetlands in the area covered by the report are included.Moreover,the absence of any reported wetlands information does not necessarily mean that wetlands do not exist in the area covered by the report. Oil/Gas Pipelines:This data was obtained by EDR from the USGS in 1994.It is referred to by USGS as GeoData Digital Line Graphs from 1:100,000-Scale Maps,It Was extracted -om the transportation category including some oil,but primarily " gas pipelines, Electric PowerTransmission Line Data Source:PennWe[l Corporation Telephone:(800)823-6277 This map includes information copydghtad by PennWell Corporation,This information is provided on a best effort basis and PennWe[[Corporation does not guarantee its accuracy nor warrant its fitness for any particular purpose,Such information has been reprinted with the permission of PennWe[I. TC1575426.1s Page GR-11 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I Sensitive Receptors:There are ndiv duas deemed sensitive receptors due to their fragile imrsune systems and special sensitivity to environmental discharges.These sensitive receptors typtoatiy include the eldedy,the sick,and children.While the location of all sensitive receptors cannot be determined,EDR indicates those buildings and facilities -schools,daycares,hospitals,medical centers and nursing homes -where individuals who are sensitive receptors are likely to be located. AlIA Hospitals: Source:Amedcen Hospital Association,Inc. Telephone:312-280-5991 The database includes a listing of hospitals based on the American Hospital Association's annual suntey of hospitals. Medical Centers:Provider of Services Listing Source:Centers for Medicare &Medicaid Services Telephone:410-786-3000 A tisting of hospitals with Medicare provider number,produced byCenters of Medicare &Medicaid Services, a federal agencywithin the U.S.Department of Health and Human Services. Nursing Homes Source:National Institutes of Health Telephone:301-594-6248 Information on Medicare and Medicaid certified nursing horses in the United States. Public Schools Source:National Center for Education Statistics Telephone:202-502-7300 The National Centerfor Education Statistics'primary database on e]ementary and secondary public education in the United States.It is a comprehensive,annual,national statistical database ofall public elementary and secondary schools and school districts,which contains data that are comparable across all states. Private Schools Source:National Center for Education Statistics Telephone:202-502-7300 The National Center for Education Statistics'pdmary database on pdvata school locations in the United States. Daycare Centers:Daycare Center Listing Source:Departoent of Social &Health Services Telephone:263-383-1735 .Flood Zone Data:This data,availabta in select counties across the country,was obtained by EDR in 1999 from the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA).Data depicts 100-year and 500-year flood zones as defined by FEMA. NWI:National Wetlands Inventory.This data,available in select counties across the country,was obtained by EDR in 2002 from the U.S.Fish and Wildlife Service. STREET AND ADDRESS INFORMATION ©2004 Geographic Data Technology,Inc.,Rel.07/2004.This product contains proprietary and confidential property of Geographic Data Technology,Inc.Unauthorized use,including copying for other than testing and standard backup procedures,of this product is expressly prohibited. TC1575426.1s Page GR-12 I I ! I ! I I | I | I I I ! I I I I I TARGET PROPERTYADDRESS PROPOSED LOWES RENTON 800 GARDEN AVENUE NORTH RENTON,WA 98055 TARGET PROPERTYCOORDINATES Latitude (North): Longitude (West): Universal Tranverse Mercator:UTM X (Meters): UTM Y (Meters): Elevation: 47.500099 -47"30'0.4" 122.199501 -122"1T 58.2" Zone 10 560290.0 5260832.5 36 ft.above sea level EDR's GeoCheck Physical Setting Source Addendum has been developed to assist the environmental professional with the collection of physical setting source information in accordance with EPA's Standards and Practices for All Appropriate Inquiries (AAI)and ASTM E 1527-05,Section 8.2.3. Section 8.2.3 requires that a current USGS 7.5 Minute Topographic Map (or equivalent,such as the USGS Digital Elevation Model)be reviewed.It also requires that one or more addifional physical setting sources be sought when (1)conditions have been identified in which hazardous substances or petroleum products are likely to migrate to or from the property,and (2)more information than is provided in the current USGS 7,5 Minute Topographic Map (or equivalent)is generally obtained,pursuant to local good commercial or customary practice, to assess the impact of migration of recognized envlrenmental conditions in connection with the proPerty.Such additional physical setting sources generally include information about the topographic,hydrologic,hydrogeologic, and geologic charecteristics of a site,and wells in the area. Assessment of the impact of contaminant migration generally has two principle investigative components: 1.Groundwater flow direction,and 2.Groundwater flow velocity. Groundwater flow direction may be impacted by surface topography,hydrology,hydregeology,characteristics of the soil,and nearby wells.Groundwater flow velocity is generally impacted by the nature of the geologic strata. EDR's GeoCheck Physical Setting Source Addendum is provided to assist the environmental professional in forming an opinion about the impact of potential contaminant migration. TC1575426.1s Page A-1 I I GROUNDWATER FLOW DIRECTION INFORMATION Groundwater flow direction for a particular site is best determined by a qualified environmental professional using site-specific well data.If such data is not reasonably ascertainable,it may be necessary to rely on other sources of information,such as surface topographic information,hydrologic information,hydrogeologic data collected on nearby properties,and regional groundwater flow information (from deep aquifers). TOPOGRAPHIC INFORMATION Surface topography may be indicative of the direction of surficial groundwater flow.This information can be used to assist the environmental professional in forming an opinion about the impact of nearby contaminated properties or, should contamination exist on the target property,what downgradient sites might be impacted. TARGET PROPERTY TOPOGRAPHYUSGSTopographicMap:47122-E2 MERCER ISLAND,WA General Topographic Gradient:General West Source:USGS 7.5 min quad index SURROUNDING TOPOGRAPHY:ELEVATION PROFILES €=v UJ Noah I South TP C) ;> UJ ==# .....-.._ West I East TP 0 112 1 Miles Target Property Elevation:36 ft.I Source:Topography has been determined from the USGS 7.5'Digital Elevation Model and should be evaluated on a relative (not an absolute)basis.Relative elevation information between sites of close proximity should be field verified. TC1575426.1s PageA-2 . I I I I I I ! I I I I I I I I I I I i I I I ! I I I I I I I I I I I I I HYDROLOGIC INFORMATION Surface water can act as a hydrologic barrier to groundwaterflow.Such hydrologic information can be used to assist the environmental professional in forming an opinion about the impact of nearby contaminated properfies or,should contamination exist on the target property,what downgradient sites might be impacted, Refer to the Physical Setting Source Map forlowing this summary for hydrologic information (major waterways and bodies of water). FEMA FLOOD ZONE Tar,qet Property County KING,WA Flood Plain Panel at Target Property: Additional Panels in search area: FEMA Flood Electronic Data YES -refer to the Overview Map and Detail Map 53033C0664F 53033C0675F 53033C0668F 53033C0981F 53033C0977F 53033C0976F NATIONAL WETLAND INVENTORY NWI Quad at Taet Property MERCER ISLAND NWI Electronic Data CoverageYES-refer to the Overview Map and Detail Map HYDROGEoLoGIC INFORMATION Hydrogeologic information obtained by installation of wells on a specific site can often be an indicator of groundwater flow direction in the immediate area,Such hydrogeologic information can be used to assist the environmental professional in forming an opinion about the impact of nearby contaminated properties or,should contamination exist on the target property,what downgradient sites might be impacted. Site-Specific HydrogeologicalData*: Search Radius: Location Relative to TP: Site Name:Site EPA ID Number: Groundwater Flow Direction: Measured Depth to Water: Hydraulic Connection: Sole Source Aquifer:.Data Quality: 1.25 miles 1/2 -t Mile West BOEING COMPANY RENTON WAD009262171 NOT AVAILABLE 2 feet to 15 feet The site is located on an alluvial plain and is undedain by glacial dnft composed of silts,sands,outwash,gravels,consolidated tills, and peat,with some fill. No information about a sole source aquifer is available Information based on site-specific subsurface investigations is documented in the CERCLIS investigation report(s) AQUIFLOW® Search Radius:1.000 Mile. EDR has developed the AQUIFLOW Information System to provide data on the general direction of groundwater flow at specific points.EDR has reviewed reports submitted by environmental professionals to regulatory authorities at select sites and has extracted the date of the report,groundwater flow direction as determined hydrogeologically,and the depth to water table. LOCATION GENERAL DIRECTION MAP ID FROM TP GROUNDWATER FLOW Not Reported *19965te-cpe¢@c drogecoglcdatag61ecedbyCElCUS/Jc,!nc,BalnbrldgelJC'd.WA-AldghtsretetVed AJtthefotmonandOpnrpresent*datElosecthacedEPArep°s},mu•Cornprehet ehroenttl Response Compenson and LabHity tnfotmn System {CERCLIS)nves6galn.TCt575426.1s Page A-3 I GROUNDWATER FLOW VELOCITY INFORMATION Groundwater flow velocity information for a paicular site is best determined by a qualified environmental professional using site specific geologic and soil strata data.If such data are not reasonably ascertainable,it may be necessary to rely on other sources of information,including geologic age identification,rock stratigrsphic unit end soil charactenstics data coltaced on nearby properties and regional soil information.In general,contaminant flumes move more quickly through sandy-grevelly types of soils than silty-clayey types of soils. GEOLOGIC INFORMATION IN GENERAL AREA OF TARGET PROPERTY Geologic information can be used by the environmental professional in forming an opinion about the relative speed at which contaminant migration may be occurring, ROCK STRATIGRAPHIC UNIT GEOLOGIC AGE IDENTIFICATION Era:Cenozoic Category:Volcanic Rocks System:Tertiary Sedes:Lower Tertiary andesite Code:ITa (decoded above as Era,System &Series) •Geologic Age and Rock Strafigrsphic Unit Source:P.G.Schruben,R.E.Arndt and W.J,Bawiec,Geology of the Conterminous U.S.at 1:2,500,000 Scale -a digital representation of the 1974 P.B.King and H.M.Beikman Map,USGS Digital Data Sedes DDS -11 (1994). DOMINANT SOIL COMPOSITION IN GENERAL AREA OF TARGET PROPERTY The U.S.Department of Agriculture's (USDA)Soil Conservation Service (SCS)leads the National Cooperative Soil Survey (NCSS)and is responsible for collecting,storing,maintaining and distributing soil survey information for privately owned lands in the United States.A soil map in a soil survey is a representation of soil patterns in a landscape•Soil maps for STATSGO are compiled by generalizing more detailed (SSURGO)soil survey maps. The following information is based on Soil Conservation Service STATSGO data. Soil Component Name:PILCHUCK Soil Surface Texture:loamy sand Hydrologic Group:Class C -Slow infiltration rates.Soils with layers impeding downward movement ofwater,or soils with moderately fine or fine textures. Soil Drainage Class:Somewhat excessive.Soils have high hydraulic conductivity and low water holding capacity.Depth to water table is more than 6 feet. Hydric Status:Soil does not meet the requirements for a hydric soil, Corrosion Potential -Uncoated Steel:MODERATE Depth to Bedrock Min: Depth to Bedrock Max: >60 inches >60 inches TC1575426.1s Page A-4 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I Layer Upper 1 0 inches 2 20 inches 3 38 inches 4 60 inches Lower 20inches 38 inches 60 inches 70 inches Soil Texture Class loamy sand sand gravelly -sand fine sandy loam AASHTO Group Granular materials (35 )ct.or less passing No. 200),Stone Fragments, Gravel and Sand. Granular materials (35 pct.or less passing No. 200),Silty,or Clayey Gravel i and Sand. Granular materials (35 pct.or less passing No. 200),Stone Fragments, Gravel and Sand. Silt-Clay Matedals (more than 36 pct. passing No. 200),Silty Soils. Unified Soil COARSE-GRAINED SOILS,Sands, Sands with fines, Silty Sand. COARSE-GRAINED SOILS,Sands, Sands wth fines, Sil Sand. COARSE-GRAINED SOILS,Sands, Clean Sands, Poody graded sand. COARSE-GRAINED SOILS,Sands; Sands with fines, Silty Sand. ermeabilityRate(in/hr) Max:20.60 Min:6.00 Max:20.00 Min:6.00 Max:20.00 Min:20.00 Max:6.00 Min:2.00 ,oil Reaction(pH) Max:7.30 Min:6.10 Max:7.30 Min:5.60 Max:7.30 Min:6.16 Max:6.50 Min:5.60 I I I I I I I I OTHER SOIL TYPES IN AREA Based on Soil Conservation Service STATSGO data,the following additional subordinant soii types may appear within the general area of target property. Soit Surface Textures:fine sandy loam silt loam silty clay loam gravelly -loam gravelly -coarse sand muck loam Surl]cial Soil Types:fine sandy loam silt loam silty clay loam gravelly -loam gravelly -coarse sand muck loam Shallow Soil Types:fine sandy loam TC1575426.1s Page A-5 I I ..............,s c ayJoamsdtloam peaty -silt loam loam sandy loam Deeper Soil Types:silt loam silty clay loam very gravelly -coarse sand .stratified loamy fine sand very gravelly -sandsapdcmatarial sand very gravelly -loamy sand loamy sand LOCAL /REGIONAL WATER AGENCY RECORDS According to ASTM E 1527-05,Section 8.2.2,"To enhance and supplement the standard environmental record sources in 8.2.1,local records and/or additional state or tribal records shaU be checked when,in the judgment of the environmental professional,such additional records (1)are reasonably ascertainable,(2)are sufficiently useful,accurate,and complete in light of the objective of the records review (see 8.1.1),and (3)are generally obtained,pursuant to local good commercial or customary practice,in inltial environmental siteassessments in the type of commercial real estate transection involved."One of the records sources listed in 8.2.2 is water well information.Water well information can be used to assist the environmental professional in assessing sources that may impact groundwater flow direction,and in forming an opinion about the impact of contaminant migration on nearby drinking water wells. WELL SEARCH DISTANCE INFORMATION DATABASE Federal USGS Federal FRDS PWS State Database SEARCH DISTANCE (miles) 1.000Nearest PWS within 1 mile .1.000 FEDERAL USGS WELL INFORMATION LOCATION MAP ID WELL ID FROM TP 1 USGS3276530 1/8 -1/4 Mile WSW 2 USGS3276505 1/4 -112 Mile SSE A3 USGS3276498 1/4 -1/2 Mile SW A4 USGS3276496 1/4 -1/2 Mile SW A5 USGS3276493 1/4 -1/2 Mile SW 6 USGS3276489 1/4 -112 Mile SW B7 USGS3276476 112 -1 Mile SSW B8 USGS3276475 1/2 -1 Mile SSW B9 USGS3276471 1/2 -1 Mile SSW 10 USGS3276436 1/2 -1 Mile South TC1575426.1s Page A-6 1_.I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I FEDERAL USGS WELL INFORMATION LOCATIONMAPIDWELLIDFROMTP 11 USGS3276437 112 -1 Mile SSW 12 USGS3276507 1/2 -1 Mile ESE C13 USGS3276405 1/2 -1 Mile SSW C14 USGS3276401 1/2 -1 Mile SSW 15 USGS3276534 1/2 -1 Mile East FEDERAL FRDS PUBLIC WATER SUPPLY SYSTEM INFORMATION MAP ID WELL ID No PWS System Found Note:PWS System location is not always the same as well location. STATE DATABASE WELL INFORMATION MAP ID WELL ID No Wells Found LOCATION FROM TP LOCATION FROM TP TC1575426.1s Page A-7 CountyBoundary /Major Roads //Contour Unes []Airports ()Earthquake epicenter,Richter 5 orgreater Water Wells Public Water Supply Wells O Cluster of Multiple Icons PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE MAP -1575426.1s i(/(7 y ___N!I i 0 I/4iT Groundwater Flow Direction I\ Indeterminate Groundwater Flowat Location (Groundwater Flow Varies at Location Closest Hydmgeological Date TARGET PROPERTY: ADDRESS:CITY/STATE/ZIP:LATfLONG: Proposed Lowes Renton800GardenAvenueNorthRentonWA98055 47.5001 /122.1995 CUSTOMER!•Geo Engineers,Inc.CONTACT:Prajakta Ghatpande INQUIRY#:1575426.1s •DATE:December 15;2005 9:04 am £.opfrig;t €:;005 EDR,I €'2004 6DT*Inc.ReL 07/2004.All Rights Re;etVed I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I | I , I I I I I I I I I I I Map ID Direction Distance Elevation 1WSW1/8 -1/4 Mile Lower Agency cd:USGS Site name:23N/O5E)8D0t Latitude:472957 Longitude:1221210 Dec Ion:-122.20401051 Coor accr:S Dec lationg datum:NAD83 State:53 Country:US Location map:RENTON Altitude:24 Altitude accuracy:3 Hydrologic: Topographic: Site type: Date inventaded: Local standard time flag: Type of ground water site: Aquifer Type: Aquifer: Well depth: Source of depth data: Real time data flag: Daily flow data end date: Peak flow data begin date:O000-O0-00 Peak flow data count:0 Water quality data end data:0000-00-00 Ground water data begin date:1961)11 Ground water data count:1 Site no: Dec 1at: Coor meth: LaUong datum: Distdct: County: Land net: Map scale: Altitude method: Altitude datum: Lake Washington.Washington.Area =619 sq.mL Not Reported Ground-watar other than Spdng Date construction: Not Reported Mean greenwich time offset: Y Single well,other than collector or Ranney type Not Reported Not Reported 60 Hole depth: ddller Project number: 0 Daily flow data begin date: 0000-00)0 Daily flow data count: Peak flow data end date: Database EDR ID Number FED USGS USGS3276538 472957122121001 47.49898875 M NAD27 53 033 NW NW S08 T23N R05E W 24000 M NGVD29 19610101 PST Not Reported Not Reported 0000*O0)0 0 00O0-00)0 Water quality data begin date:0000-00-00 Water quality data count:0 Ground water data end date:1961-01)1 Ground-water levels,Number of Measurements:1 Feet below Feet to Date Surface Sealevel 1961-01-01 9 I i I I I I 2SSE FED USGS USGS3276505 114 -112 MileHigher Agency ed:USGS Site no:472947122114901 Site name:23N/05E-08F01 Latitude:472947 Longitude:122t 149 Dec 1at:47.49621103 Dec Ion:-122.19817703 Coor meth:M Coor acor:S Lationg datum:NAD27 Dec lationg datum:NAD83 District:53 State:53 County:033 Country:US Land net:SE NW S08 T23N R05E W Location map:RENTON Map scale:24000 TC1575428.1s Page A-9 i i !:::G:EocH-EK 'YSiCA L sEiN G S6URCE MAP;FiND iNGS ::::"::::":::÷:.I M NGVD29 Altitude:34 Altitude method: Al6tude accuracy:3 Altitude datum: Hydrologic:Lake Washington.Washington•Area =619 sq.mi. Topographic:Not Reported Site typo:Ground-watar other than Spdog Date construc6ea: Date inventoded:Not Reported Mean greenwich time offset: Local standard time flag:Y Type of ground water site:Single well,other than collector or Ranney type Aquifer Type:Not Reported Aquifer:Not Reported Well depth:131 Hole depth:Not Reported Source of depth data:dfitier Project number:Not Reported Real time data flag:O Daily flow data begin date:0000-004)0 Dally flow data end date:0000-00-00 Daily flow data count:0 Peak flow data begin date:00000-00 Peak flow data end date:0000-00-00 Peak flow data count:0 Water quality data begin date:00000O Water quality data end date:0OOO-00-00 Water quality data count:0 Ground water data begin date:1962)1<11 Ground water data end date:1962-01)1 Ground water data count:1 19620101 PST Ground-water levels.Number of Measurements:1 Feet below Feet to Date Surface Sealevel- 1962-01-01 9 I I I I I I I A3SW1/4 -1/2 Mile Lower Agency cd:USGS Site name:23N/05E-O8E04 Latitude:472944 Longitude:1221219 Dec Ion:-122.26651051 Coor accr:S Dec la0ong datum:NAD83 State:53 Country:US Location map:RENTON Altitude:29.6 Altitude accuracy:.1 Hydrologic: Topographic: Site type: Date inventoded: Local standard time flag: Type of ground water site: Aquifer Type: Aquifer: Well depth: Source of depth data; Real time data flag: Daily flow data end date: Peak flow data begin date: Peak flow data count: Water quality data end date:g000-O0-00 Ground water data begin date:195602-13 Groundwater data count:1 FED USGS USGS3276498 Site no: Dec lat: Coor meth: Latlong datum: District: County: Land net: Map scale: Altitude method: AI6tude datum: Lake Washington.Washington.Area =619 sq.mL Not Reported Ground-water other than Spring Date construction: Not Reported Mean greenwich time offset: Y Single well.otherthan collector or Ranney type Not Reported Not Reported 129 ddller 0 0000-06-00 0000-00-00 0 472944122121901 47.49537763 M NAD27 53 033 SW NW S08 T23N R05E W 24000 L NGVD29 19560101 PST Hole depth:Not Reported Project number:Not Reported Daily flow data begin date:0000-004)0 Daily flow data count:0 Peak flow data end date:0000-06-00 Water quality data begin date:0000-60-00 Water quality data count:0 Ground water data end date:1956-02-13 TC1575426.1s Page A-10 I I I I I I I I I I I I •I I I Ground-water levels,Number of Measurements:1 Feet below Feet to Date Surface Sealevel 1956-02-13 2 I I I I I I I I I A4 SW 1/4 -1/2 Mile Lower Agency od:USGS Site name:23N/05E-08E03 Latitude:472943 Longitude:1221218 Dec Ion:-122.20623272 Coor accr:S Dec tatlon9 datum:NAD83 Stste 53 Country:US Location map:RENTON Altitude:26.5 Altitude accuracy;.1 Hydrologic: Topographic: Site type: Date inventoried: Local standard time flag: Type of ground water site: Aquifer Type: Aquifer: Well depth: Source of depth data: Real time data flag: Daily flow data end date: Peak flow data begin date: Peak flow data count: Water quality data end date:Not Reported Ground water data begin date:Not Reported Ground water data count:Not Reported FED USGS USGS3276496 Site no:472943122121801 Dec tat:47.49509985 Coot meth:M Latlong datum:NAD27 District:53 County:033 Land net:SW NW S08 T23N RO5E W Map scale:24000 Algtede method:L Altitude datum:NGVD29 Lake Washington,Washington,Area =619 sq.mL Not Reported Ground-water othertan Spring Date construction: Not Reported Mean greenwich time offset: Y Single well,other than collector or Ranney type Not Reported Not Reported 59 ddltar Not Reported Not Reported Not Reported Not Reported 19620101 PST Hole depth:Not Reported Project number:Not Reported Daily flow data begin date:Not Reported Daily flow data count:Not Reported Peak flow data end date:Not Reported Water quality data begin date:Not Reported Water quality data count:Not Reported Ground water data end date:Not Reported Ground-water levels,Number of Measurements:0 I I I I I I ASSW1/4 -1/2 Mile Lower Agency ed:USGS Site name:23N/05E-08E02 Latitude:472942 Longitude:1221217 Dec Ion:-122.20595494 Coor accr:S Dec laflong datum:NAD83 State:53 Country:US Location map:RENTON Site no: Dec lat: Door meth: batlong datum: District: County: Land net: Map scale: FED USGS USGS3276493 472942122121701 47.49482208 M NAD27 53 033 SWNWS08T23N R05E W 24000 TC1575426.1s Page A-11 .•IIS:,x"::,';;GEOGHECK®-:RH¥SGAL::SE NG SOURGE MAPiEINDINGS3x-;:: I I L NGVD29 Altitude:28.5 Altitude method: Altitude accuracy:.1 Altitude datum: Hydrologic:Lake Washington.Washington.Area =619 sqmL Topographic:Not Reported Site type:Groued-water other than 8pdng Date construction: Date inventoried:Not Reported Mean greenwich time offset: Local standard time flag:Y Type ofground water site:Single well,otherthan collector or Ranney type Aquifer Type:Not Reported Aquifer:Not Reported Well depth:57 Hole depth:Not Reported Source of depth data:ddller Project number:Not Reported Real time data flag:0 Dailyflow data begin date:0000-00-00 Daily flow data end date:0000-0O-OO Daily flow data count:O Peak flow data begin date:00go-00-00 Peak flow data end date:0000-06-O0 Peak flow data count:O Water quality data begin date:OO00-OO)0 Water quality data end date:g000-D00O Water quality data count:0 Ground water data begin date:1961 )8-17 Ground water data end date:1961-68-17 Ground waterdata count:1 19610101 PST Ground-water levels,Number of Measurements:1 Feet below Feet to Date Surface Seatavel 1961-08-17 12 I I I I I I I 6SW1/4 -1/2 MileHigher Agency ed: Site name: Latitude: -Longitude: Dec Ion: Coot acct. Dec latlong datum: State: Counky: Location map: Altitude: Altitude accuracy: Hydrologic: Topographic:' Site type: Date inventoried: Local standard time flag: Type of ground watersite: Aquifer Type: •Aquifer: Well depth: Source of depth data: Real time data flag: Daily flow data end date: Peak flow data begin date: Peak flow data count: FED USGS USGS3276489 USGS Site no:472941122121601 23N/O5E-08E01 472941 1221216 Dec lat:47.49454431 -122.20567715 Coor meth:M S Latlong datum:NAD27 NAD83 Distct:53 53 County:033 US Land net:SW NW SO5 T23N R05E W RENTON Map scale:24000 28 Altitude method:M 3 Attitude datum:NGVO26 19620101 PST Lake Washington•Washington•Area =619 sq.mi. Not Reported Ground-water other than Spdng Date construction: Not Reported Mean greenwich time offset: Y Single well,other than collector or Ranney type Not Reported Not Reported 56 ddiler Not Reported Not Reported Not Reported Not Reported Hole depth;Not Re project number:Not Re Daily flow data begin date:Not Re Daily flow data count:Not Re Peak flow data end date:Not Re Water quality data begin date:Not Re Water quality data count:Not Re Ground water data end date:Not Re orted orted orted )orted x)rted >orted >orted )ortedWaterqualitydataenddata:Not Reported Ground water data begin date:Not Reported Ground water data count:Not Reported TC1575426.1s Page A-12 Ground-water levels,Number of Measurements:0 I I I I I I I I I I I I I Map ID Direction Distance Elevation SSW1/2 -1 MileHigher Agency cd:USGS Site name:23N/05E-08MO3 Latitude:472936 Longitude:1221205 Dec Ion:-122.20262152 Coor accr:S Dec latlong datum:NAD83 State:53 Country:US Location map:RENTON Altitude:28.5 Al6tude accuracy:,1 Hydrologic: Topographic: Site type: Date inventoried: Local standard 0me flag: Type of ground water site: Aquifer Type: Aquifer: Well depth: Source of depth data: Real 6me data flag: Daily flow data end date: Peak flow data begin date: Peak flow data count: Water quality data end data:0000-O0-OO Ground water data begin date:1962)1-18 Ground water data count:1 Ground-water levels,Number of Measurements:1 Feet below Feet to Date Surface Sealevel 1962-01-18 11 Database EDR ID Number FED USGS USGS3276476 Site no: Dec tat: Coor meth: Laflong datum: District: County: Land net: Map scale: Altitude method: Altitude datum: Lake Washington.Washington.Area =619'sq.mi. Not Reported Ground-water other than Spring Date constnJction: Not Reported Mean greenwich 6me offset: Y Single well,other than collector or Ranney type Not Reported Not Reported Not Reported Not Reported 0 00O0-000 0000-00-OO 0 472936122120501 47.49315545 M NAD27 53 033 NWSWS08T23N R05E W 24000 L NGVD29 19620101 PST Hole depth:Not Reported Project number:Not Reported Daily flow data begin date:O0O0-00)O Daily flow data count:O Peak flow data end date:0O00-00-0O Water quality data begin date:0000-00=00 Water quality data count:0 Ground water data end date:1962-01-18 I I I I I I B8SSW FED USGS USGS3276475 112 -1 MileHigher Agency cd:.USGS Site no:472935122120401 Site name:23N/O5E-08M62 Latitude:472935 Longitude:1221204 Dec lat:47.49287767 Dec Ion:-122.20234373 Coor meth:M Coot accr:S Laflong datum:NAD27 Dec laflong datum:NAD83 District:53 State:53 County:033 Country:US •Land net:NW SW S08 T23N R05E W Location map:RENTON Map scale:24000 TC1575426.1s Page A-13 I I Altitude: Altitude accuracy: Hydrologic: Topographic: Site type: Date inventoried: Local standard time flag: Type of ground water site: Aquifer Type: Aquifer:. Well depth: Source of depth data: Real time data flag: Daiy flow data end date: Peak flow data begin date: Peak flow data count Water quality data end date:0000*00*0O Ground water data begin date:19618-21 Ground water data count:1 28.4 Altitude method:L .1 Altitude datum:NGVD29 Lake Washington•Washington.Area =619 sq.ml. Not Reported Ground-watar other than Spring Data construction:Net Reported Not Reported Mean greenwich time ofFset:PST Y.Single well,other than collectoror Ranney type Not Reported Not Reported 65 ddller O OOOOOO o00g*00O 0 Hole depth:Not Reported Project number:Not Reported Daily flow data begin date:OO00-00-0O Daily flow data count:0 Peak flow data end date:0000*00*00 Water quality data begin date:0000-00*00 Water quality data count:0 Ground water data end date:1961-08-21 Ground-watar levels,Number of Measurements:1 Feet below Feet to Date Surface Sealevel 1961-08-21 12 I I I I I I I B9SSW 1/2 -1 MileHigher Agency cd:USGS Site name:23N/O5E*08MO1 Latitude:472934 Longitude:1221203 Dec tun:-122.20206595 Coor acc S Dec lagong datum:NAD83 State:53 Counby:US Location map:RENTON Altitude:28.5 Altitude accuracy:.1 Hydrologic: Topographic: Site type: Date inventoded: Local standard time flag: Type of ground water site: Aquifer Type: Aquifer: Well depth: Source ofdepth data: Real time data flag: Daily flow data end date: Peak flow data begin date: Peak flow data count: Water quality data end date:O000-g0*00 Ground water data begin date:t962-01-16 Ground water data count:1 FED USGS USGS3276471 Site no: Dec lat: Coot meth: Laflong datum: Disl]ict: County: Land net: Map scale: Altitude method: Altitude datum: Lake Washington.Washington.Area :619 sq.mi. Not Reported Ground-water other than Spdng Date construction: Not Reported Mean greenwich time offset: Y Single well,other than collector or Ranney type Not Reported Not Reported 7O ddller 0 0000-00*00 0000-00*00 0 472934122120301 47.4925999 M NAD27 53 033 NW SW S08 T23N R05E W 24000 L NGVD29 19620101 PST Hole depth:Not Reported Project number:Not Reported Daily flow data begin date:0000-00*00 Daily flow data count:0 Peak flow data end date:.0000*00-00 Water quality data begin date:0000*00*00 Water quality data count:O Ground waterdata end date:1962.01-16 TC1575426.1s.Page A-14 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I Ground-water levels,Number of Measurements:1 Feet below Feet to Date Sudace Sealevel 1962-01-16 14 10 South 1/2 -1 MileHigher Agency cd:USGS Site name:23N/0flE)SN01 Latitude:472921 Longitude:1221205 Dec Ion:-122.20262147 Coor accr:S Dec latlong datum:NAD83 State:53 Country:US Location map:RENTON Altitude:26 Altitude accuracy:3 Hydrologic:Topographic: Site type: Date inventoried: Local standard Ume flag: Type of ground water site: Aquifer Type: Aquifer: Well depth: Source of depth data: Real time data flag: Daily flow data end date: Peak flow data begin date: Peak flow data count: Water quality data end data:0000-00-00 Ground water data begin date:1960)9-12 Ground water data count:1 Ground-water levels,Number of Measurements:1 Feet below Feet to Date Surface Sealevel 1960-09-12 11 FED USGS USGS3276436 Site no:472921122120501 Dec lat:47.4889888 Coot meth:M Laflong datum:NAD27 Disthct:53 County:033 Land net:SW SW S08 T23N R05E W Map scale:24000 Altitude method:M Altitude datum:NGVD29 Lake Washington.Washington.Area =619 sq.mi. Not Reported Ground-water other than Spring Date construction: Not Reported Mean greenwich time offset: Y Single well,other than collector or Ranney type Not Reported Not Reported 33 ddner 0 O000-o0go 0000)0-00 O 19600101 PST Hole depth:Not Reported Project number:Not Reported Daily flow data begin date:0000-00-00 Daily flow data count:O Peak flow data end date:00000-00 Water quality data begin date:0000-00)0 Water quality data count:0 Ground water data end date:1960-09-12 I I I I I 11SSW 1/2 -1 Mile Lower FED USGS USGS3276437 TC1575426.1s Page A-15 I I Agency cd:USGS Site name:23N/05E-18H02 Latitude:472921 Longitude:1221224 Dee tun:-122.20789935 Coor acc S Dec laflong datum:NAD83 State:53 Country:US Location map:RENTON Altitudp:33.2 Altitude accuracy:.1 Hydrologic: Topographic: Site type: Date inventoried: Local standard time flag: Type of ground water site: Aquifer Type: Aquifer:. Well depth: Source of depth data: Real time data flag: Daily flow data end date: Peak flow data begin date: Peak flow data count: Water quality data end date:Not Reported Ground waterdata begin date:Not Reported Ground waterdata count:.Not Reported Site no:472921122122401 Dec lat:47.48898875 Coor meth:M Latlong datum:NAD27 District:53 County:033 Land net:SE NE $18 T23N R05E W Map scare:24000 Altitude method:L Altitude datum:NGVD29 Lake Washington.Washington.Area =619 sq.mi. Not Reported Ground-water other than Spdng Date construction: Not Reported Mean greenwich time offset: Y Singfe well,other than collector or Ranney type Not Reported Not Reported 40 dd[ler Not Reported Not Reported Not Reported Not Reported 19600101 PST Hole depth: project number:Not Re Daily flow data begin date:Not Re Daily flow data count Not Re Peak flow data end date:Not Re Water quality data begin date:Not Re Water quality data count:Not Re Ground waterdata end date:Not Re Not Re rted rted rted rted rted rted >orted )ord Ground-water levels,Number of Measurements:0 I I I I I I I I 12ESE 1/2 -1 MileHigher Agency cd:USGS Site name:23W05E-09E01 Latitude:472948 Longitude:1221050 Dee tun:-122.18178784 Coot acon S Dec lagong datum:NAD83 State:93 Country:US Location map:RENTON Ntitude:285 Altitude accuracy:3 Hydrologic: Topographic; Site type: Date inventoried: Local standard time flag: Type of ground water site: Aquifer Type:Not Reported Aquifer:Not Reported Well depth:424 Source of depth data:other Real time data flag:0 Daily flow data end date:O00000 Peak flow data begin date:0O00-000 Site no: Dec lat: Coot meth: Lationg datum: District: County: Land net: Map scale: Altitude method: Altitude datum: Lake Washington.Washington.Area =619 sq.mi. Not Reported Ground*water other than Spring Date construction: Not Reported Mean greenwich time offset: Y Single well,other than collector or Ranney type FED USGS USGS3276507 472948122105001 47.49648895 M NAD27 53 033 SWNWS09T23N R05E W 24000 M NGVD29 19430905 PST Hole depth:Not Reported Project number:.Not Reported Dally flow data begin date:O000-00-00 Daily flow data count:0 Peak flow data end date:OOO0-000 TC1575426.1s Page A-16 I I I I I I I I I I ...........,GEOCHECK .P.,HZSICAE,SEINGSOURGEMANE!ND!NG$,,:.......<.I i I I Peak flow data count:O Water quality data end date:1951-06-04 Ground water data begin date:1943-09-05 Ground water data count:1 Ground-water levels,Number of Measurements:1 Feet below Feet to Date Surface Sealevel 1943-09-05 85 Water quality data begin date:1951-06-04 Water quality data count:1 Ground water data end date:1943-09-05 I I I I I I I I I C13SSW 1/2 -1 Mile Lower Agency cd:USGS Site no: Site name:23N/05E-17D02 Latitude:472916 Longitude:1221214 Dec tat: Dec Ion:-122.2061215 Coor meth: Coor accr:S Laflong datum: Dec la8ong datum:NAD83 District: State:53 County: Count:US Land net: Location map:RENTON Map scale: Altitude:32.3 Altitude method: Altitude accuracy:.1 .Altitude datum: Hydrologic:Lake Washington.Washington.Area =619 sq.mi." Topographic:Not Reported Site type:Ground-watar oter tan Spring Date construction: Date inventoded:Not Reported Mean greenwich time offset: Local standard time flag:Y Type of ground water site:Single well other than coUector or Ranney type Aquifer Type:Not Reported Aquifer:Not Reported Well depth:48 Hole depth: Source of depth data:ddller project number:Not Re Real time data flag:Not Reported Daily 8ow data begin date:Not Re Daily flow data end date:Not Reported Daily flow data count:Not Re Peak flow data begin date:Not Reported Peak flow data end date:NotRe Peak flow data count:Not Reported Water quality data begin date:Not Re Water quality data count:Not Re Ground water data end date:Not RE Water quality data end date:Not Reported Ground water data begin date:Not Reported Ground water data count:Not Reported FED USGS USGS3276405 472916122121401 47.48759989 M NAD27 53 033 NWNWS17T23N R05E W 24000 L NGVD29 19610101 PST Not Re )orted )orted )orted orted orfed orted orted )orted Ground-watar levels,Number of Measurements:O I I I I I C14SSW 1/2 -1 MileLower FED USGS USGS3276401 TC1575426.1s PageA-17 I -:-......--,,GEOCHEGK®-PHYS.JCALE'CTING;SOURCE MAP FINDINGS .m:,.::3 '".I Agency cd:USGS Site name:23N/05E-17D01 Latitude:472915 Longitude:1221213 Dec Ion:-122.20484371 Coor acc S Dec lationg datum:NAD83 State:53 Country:US Location map:RENTON Altitude:29.5 Altitude accuracy:.1 Hydrotugic: Topographic: Site type: Date inventoried: Local standard time flag: Type of ground water sita: Aquifer Type: Aquifer:. Well depth: Source of depth data: Real time data flag: DaVy flow data end date: Peak flow data begin date: Peak flow data count: Water quality data end date:0000-00-0O Ground water data begin date:1959-12-08 Giound water data count:1 Site no:•472915122121301 Dec lat:47.48732212 "Coor meth:M Latlong datum:NAD27 Distdct:53 County:033 Land net:NW NW $17 T23N R05E W Map scale:24000 Altitude method:L Altitude datum:NGVD29 Lake Washington.Washington.Area =619 sq.mi. Not Reported Ground-water other than Spdng Date construction: Not Reported Mean greenwich time offset: Y Single well,otherthan collector or Ranneytype Not Reported Not Reported 42 ddltur 0 OOO0-00-0O 0000-00-00 0 19590101 PST Hole depth:Not Reported Project number:Not Reported Daily flow data begin date:0000-o0-0O Dally flow data count:0 Peak flow data end date:0000-00-0O Water quality data begin date:0O000000 Water quality data count:0 Ground waterdata end date:1959-128 Ground-waterlevels,Number of Measurements:1 Feet below Feet to Date Surface Sealevel 1959-12-08 10 I I I I I I I I I 15East1/2 -1 MileHigher Agency cd:USGS Site name:23N/05E9C02 Latitude:472956 Longitude:1221038 Dec tun:-122.17845448 Coor accr:S Dec laUong datum:NAD83 State:53 Country:US Location map:RENTON Aflitude:400 Altitude accuracy:3 Hydrologic: Topographic: Site type: Date inventeded: FED USGS Site no:472956122103801 Dec lat:47.49871119 Coor meth:M LaUong datum:NAD27 District:53 County:033 Land net:NE NW S09 T23N R05E W Map scale:24000 Altitude method:M Altitude datum:NGVD29 Lake Washington.Washington.Area =619 sq.mi. Not Reported Ground-water other-than Spring Data construction: Not Reported Mean greenwich time offset: 19010101 PST TC1575426.1s Page A-18 USGS3276534 I I I I I I I I I I •I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I Local standard time flag:Y Type of ground water site:Single well,other than collector or Ranney type Aquifer Type:Not Reported Aquifer:Not Reported Well depth:200 Source of depth data:ddller Real time data flag:0 Oaily flow data end date:0000-00-00 Peak flow data begin date:0000-004}0 Peak flow data count:0 Water quality data end date:OOOO-O0O . Ground water data begin data:1958-10-01 Ground water data count:1 Hole depth:Not Reported Project number:Not Reported Daily flow data begin date:0ti0ti-0g-00 Daily flow data count:0 Peak flow data end date:0000-00-00 Water quality data begin date:0000-004)0 Water quality data count:0 Ground water data end date:1958-10-01 Ground-water levels,Number of Measurements:1 Feet below Feet to Date Surface Sealevel 1958-10-01 55 Note:The site was being pumped. TC1575426.1s Page A-19 III:÷-;:G EOC H ECK -PHYSIGALSEING SOUICEMAP;FJ NDINGS :,:::-=-,,--:,1 ............................_.........................c N.............................................................,..,.c.::.................,,m:........-,-..-,......I AREA RADON INFORMATION Federal EPA Radon Zone for KING County:3 Note:Zone 1 Indoor average Ievel•4 pCi/L :Zone 2 indoor average level >=2 pC[/L and <=4 pCi/L. :Zone 3 indoor average level <2 pCi/L. Federal Area Radon Information for Zip Code:98055 I I INumberofsitestested:1 Area Average Activity %<4 pCi/L %4-20 pCi/L %>20 pCVL Living Area -Ist Floor 0.200 pC[/L 100%0%0% Living Area -2nd Floor Not Reported Not Reported Not Reported Not Reported Basement 0.200 pC[/L 100%0%0% TC1575426.1s Page A-20 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I TOPOGRAPHIC INFORMATION U5GS 7.5'Digital Elevation Model (DEM) Source:United States Geologic Survey EDR acquired the USGS 7.5'Digital Eievaflon Model in 2002.7.5-Minute DEMs correspond to the USGS 1:24,000-and 1:25,000-scale topographic quadrangle maps. HYDROLOGIC INFORMATION Flood Zone Data:This data,available in select counties across the country,was obtained by EDR in 1999 from the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA).Data depicts 100-year and 500-year flood zones as defined by FEMA. NWI:Nagonal Wetlands inventory.This data,available in select counties across the country,was obtained by EDR in 2002 from the U.S.Fish and Wildlife Service. HYDROGEOLOGIC INFORMATION AQUIFLOWR Information System Source:EDR prbpdetary database ofgroundwater flow information EDR has developed the AQUIFLOW Informa5on System (AIS)to provide data on the general direction of groundwater flow at specific points.EDR has reviewed reports submitted to regulatory authorities at select sites and has extracted the date of the report,hydrogeologically determined groundwaterflow direcon and depth to water table information. GEOLOGIC INFORMATION Geologic Age and Rock Stratigraphic Unit Source:P.G.Schruben,R.E.Amdt and W.J.Bawiec,Geology of the Conterminous U.S.at 1:2,500,000 Scale -A digital representation of the 1974 P.B.King and H.M.Beikman Map,USGS Digital Data Sedes DDS -11 (1994). STATSGO:State Soil Geographic Database Source:Department of Agriculture,Natural Resources Conservation Services The U.S.Department of Agdcultare's (USDA)Natural Resources Conservation Service (NRCS)leads the national Conservation Soil Survey (NCSS)and is responsible for collecting,sfodng,maintainin and distributing soil survey information for pdvataly owned lands in the United States.A soil map in a soil survey is a representation of soil patterns in a landscape.Soil maps for STATSGO are compiled by generalizing more detailed (SSURGG) soil survey maps. LOCAL I REGIONAL WATER AGENCY RECORDS FEDERAL WATER WELLS PWS:Public Water Systems Source:EPNOffice of Dnnking Water Telephone:202-564-3750 Public Water System data from the Federal Reporting Data System.A PWS is anywatersystem which provides water to at . least 25 people for at least 60 days annually,PWSs provide water from wells,rivers and other sources, PWS ENF:Public Water Systems Violation and Enforcament Data Source:EPNOffice of Drinking Water Telephone:202-564-3750 Violation and Erforcement data for Public Water Systems from the Safe Ddnking Water Information System (SDWIS)after August 1995.prior to August 1995,the data came from the Federal Reporting Data System (FRDS). USGS Water Wells:USGS National Water Inventory System (NWiS) This database contains descriptive information on sites where the USGS collects or has collected data on surface water and/or groundwater.The groundwater data includes information on wells,spdngs,and other sources of groundwater. TC1575426.1 s Page A-21 I STATE RECORDS Water Wells Source:Deparbent of TranspodatJon Telephone:360-705-7444 Group A well location points in Washington State. Kitsap County Water Wells in Washington Source:Public Utility District No.1 of KJtsap County Telephone:206-779-7656 OTHER STATE DATABASE INFORMATION RADON Area Radon Information Source:USGS Telephone:703-356-4020 The National Radon Database has been developed by the U.S.Environmental Protec6on Agency (USEPA)and is a comptiatJon of the EP/VStata Residential Radon Survey and the National Residential Radon Survey. The study covers the years 1986 -1992.Where necessary data has been supplemented by information collected at privafa sources such as universities and research institutions. EPA Radon Zones Source:EPA Telephone:703-356-4020 Sections 307 &309 of IRAA directed EPA to list and identify areas of U.S.with the potantial for elevated indoor radon levels. OTHER Airport Landing Facilities:Private and public use landing facilities Source:Federal Aviation Administration,800-457-6656 Epicenters:Wodd earthquake epicenters,Richterborgreater Source:Department of Commerce,National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration TC1575426.1s Page A-22 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I GEOENGINEERS APPENDIX C SELECTED HISTORICAL RESEARCH DOCUMENTS I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I Print Map Page King County i Parcel Map and Data I Parcel Number 0823059217 Address 800 GARDEN AV N Zipcode 98055 Taxpayer DASH 80 LP The information included on this map has been compiled by King County staff from a vadety of sources and is subject to change without notice.King County makes no representations or warranties,express or implied,as to accuracy,completeness,timeliness,or dghts to the use of such information.King County shall not be liable for any general,special,indirect,inddentaL or consequential damages including,but not limited o,lost revenues or lost profits resulting from the use or misuse of the information ;ontoined on this map,Any sale of this map or information on this map is prohibited =.xcept bywritten permission of King County." I GIS Center I News I Services I Comments I Search By visiting this and other King County web pages, you expressly agree to be bound by terms and conditions of the site.]]ze,_acl,z& http://www5.metrokc.gov/parcelviewer/Print Process.asp Page 1 of 1 2/1/2006 I (,'- King County:Assessor Property Characteristics Report By law this information may not be used for commercial purposes. Assessor Real Property Records: Parcel Number 0823059217TaxpayerDASH80LPAccountNumber082305921700 Tax Year 2005 Levy Code 2100 Tax Status TAXABLE Appraised Land Value Appraised Improvement Value Taxable Value Reason NONE ORUNKNOWN $11,170,500 Taxable Land Value $11,170,500 $6,150,100 Taxable Improvement Value $5,150,100 Parcel Number 0823059217TaxpayerDASH80LPAccountNumber082305921700 Tax Year 2006 Levy Code 2100 Tax Status TAXABLE Taxable Value Reason NONE ORUNKNOWN Appraised Land Value $13,032,200 Taxable Land Value $13,032,200 Appraised Improvement $3,460,000 Taxable Improvement Value $3,460,000Value Assessor Property Sales Records: 13p:use the Recorders Office:Excise Tax Affidavits Report tosee more sales records details Sale Date 1111712000 Sale Price Seller Name THE BOEING CO $15,228,926 Buyer Name DASH 80 LP Assessor Parcel Records: District Name RENTON Property Name FRY'S ELECTRONICS Plat Name Plat Block Plat Lot Lot Area !930,877 SqFt (21.37 acres) Section/Township/Range NW 8 23 5 Property COMMERCIALType Present Retail(Big Use Box) Water WATER System DISTRICT Sewer PUBLICSystem Access PUBLIC Street PAVEDSurface http://www5.metrokc.gov/reports/property_report asp?PIN=0823059217 •Page 1 of 3 12/15/2005 I I I •In I i i I I i I i I I i I I i I I |• I I I I I I I I I I I I I I King County:Assessor Property Characteristics Report Account Number Legal Description Assessor Legal Description Records: Record [082305921700 Number 01 09 082305 217 PORTION OF NW 1/4 &NE 1/4 BEGIN INTERSECTION OF S LINE OF NW 1/4 WITH ELY MARGIN OF GARDEN STREET TH S 89-28-08 E 638.89 FT TO POINT ON WLY MARGIN OF PACIFIC COAST RR CP R/W, SAID POINT BEING UPON A CURVE TO RIGHT RADIUS OF 810.39 FT FROM WHICH TH CENTER OF CIRCLE BEARS N 52-20-26 E TH ALONG SAID MARGIN CURVING TO RIGHT ARC LENGTH OF 277.71 FT TO POINT OF TANGENCY TH N 18-01-31 W 1983.78 FT TO INTERSECTION WITH SLY MARGIN OF PSH-1 NORTH RENTON INTERCHANGE A-LINE R/W TH S 49-10-34 W 406.07 FT TH S 31-54-35 W 72.66 FT TO POINT ON ELY MARGIN OF GARDEN STREET TH S 17-59-39 E 1329.46 FT TO POINT OF CURVE TO RIGHT RADIUS OF 910 FT TH ALONG SAID MARGIN CURVING TO RIGHT ARC LENGTH OF 294.22 FT TO POINT OF TANGENCY TH S 00-31-51 W 253.23 FT TO POINT OF BEGINNING LESS PORTION OF PRIMARY STATE HIGHWAY NO 1 (SR 405)NORTH RENTON INTERCHANGE (PARKING LOT 6) Assessor Commercial Building Records: Address 800 GARDEN AV N 98055 Building Number 1 Building Quality AVERAGE Number of Buildings Year Built Gross SqFt Net SqFt Stodes Heating•System Predominant Use 1 2002 151840 151840 1 Building Description FRY'S ELECTRONICS RETAIL STORE Construction Class MASONRY Shape Approx Square Spdnklers Y Elevators WARMED AND COOLED AIR DISCOUNT STORE (319) This reportwas generated:12/15/2005 2:34:07 PM Related on-line reports: _K.nq Cou_nty GIS:Property_informa_tion.F_.A_9............................................................. King County Assessor:Submit a reauest to correct this information DDES:Permit Applications Report KinCgty:Districts and Development Conditions Reo Kin_g C?unty Assessor:eRea_l proper Relo(pDl:.forma![equ![es Ac[oba!)...... Kinq County Assessor:Quarter Section Map Report (PDF format requires http://www5.rnetrokc.gov/reports/property report.asp?PIN=0823059217 Page 2 of 3 12/15/2005 •! f ( C King County:Assessor Property Characteristics Report IKinq County Treasury Operations:Property Tax Information I IRecorders Office:Excise Tax Affidavits Report LIIRecordersOnce:Scanned imaaes of plats,survevs,and other map documents Enter a 10 digit Parcel Number:I. or Enter an address:[ King County i GIS Center I News I Services I Comments By visiting this and other King County web pages,you expressly agree to be bound by terms and conditions of the site. Search http://www5.metrokc.gov/reports/property_report.asp?PIN=0823059217 Page 3 of 3 12/15/2005 I I I I I I I I I I I 1 I I I I I I I I I |: I I I I I ! I EXIT 5 NEPARKDRWE KELLERSUPPLyCOMPANY BOOFT f I LEGEND: IN3EING BUIkDING AND NUMBER REEERENCE:BASE MAP PROVIDED BY BOEING I I AGI LTECHNOLOGIES RgZcdr PROJECTNO." 14,327.303 Site and Surrounding Area Map Boeing/Renton Phase1 ESA Renton,Washington 'DRAWI DATE APPRQVEO DWD 12Apt 99 f/j' FIGURE2 DA31E-- R.EA 870118115 f I II I I I I I ..... °1 ! I I I I I I I I i I I I I I .-A c. •%. i \ ° ©o t X" 0 o C X 0 00 N0 o M C 4- 0 z . ! ! J+: AOOTO""TAX LOT4FOUOIJ)€:+x "2.L7+,Ra,.,g.._+"._,._.EW,ma,+l,t.oo, PERMIT NO.B Zg 'I I+F',bF.X r+IP,fltFAC-Tt.Jr; DATE ;I Addras,<3 *1=HOU%Ep "t.x)A'1 N0(''r . 3-G-72- -7 HOISTSI Et*¢ ELEVATOII$DOCKS AND PIERS INTERIOR WALLS&CEtLINI; S+ud Wood Metal I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I III --3 •ZWI1 --\ \-o r \Ii go o'o *i C). -3 I • ; C. if. C I I I I PERMIT NO.+.•T Lot /7/Tr I /-,_., ,,.,:' .StorleJ Pie.Stems Pie.Rooms BOlllmlmt Unit Pie.Offices Sob Ft. No.Apa+J.[ I n D 2 .r'i3 ,.ns...D+... •TYpE OF CONSTRUCTION Frml+ MelgI.Prelnb Onll sonrf Clbl!A Rein.Cone. StrJ.$1eel end Conc. Stmct.Steel.Frme of QUALITy-TYPE FOUNDATION Mud $111OPost PI Co,D Brlek ROOF CONSTRU""OR F[NISIIES .PLUMBING Froml.Jolel Fie +[]MII F;=lures • Mill-neCk Oo1([]Bole Wolls Toil;Is /Ur;nals Rein.C,+.Line '[]Tvb R+cel!Tubs Leg.or Pro. s,.i p,...t o.€,"c....,[]€+.t...a°en.'O'.F'... TSeee Sm Tz,Vn;tl,+S;nke.'o/;" .""Vinyl Woehe OrmII,&'Stroll PhT411"Tll, H.W.Tke L.Troy e Dole lJlll "/Dave Ad Sllt Ef|ectle°Aile__Ym •Ff Ced +k "I BASEMENT Full Po. b-Bgemnt Size__ Flrs PI.B& Pie`''t s RI EXTERIOR WALL NST. Si,lli O Oble StuWalls r..• Come.__'PII.I l.in,C=.Sel.to. Tm'U'Fi..;W=." "..Cun WII EXTERIOR FACING . Siding Stv©5hee! Mlrblr=rete.. B,Ick E Verer + mISC,TAHK;,"i:t.....ELEVATORS AuTo+EI° Man.+Nydr T" .! WALLS&CEILIHG Stud 11o<1 .Metol Ply,,d Solill .Block .%ul Prle Finl shacl .UnFInlh;cl Pointed Vernlsh; Exist. Rcm#."Flr Jllt '•-•:,O.C. Mill --Oe ;NTERIOR TRIM R,Cm.¢.,.,."EIe'.Fi;"Birch. s,..z oz.e.".0.,,I,=f ROOF COVERING 0OC1($AND PIERS "WIRING Trld.PileTreE+. GROUND FLOOR AREA m * AREA .•..'.-:•.". .% ++. COmpo .__1 . .......,T .....,+,+...-. Elec.011 Gas H.W..St.H.A. B.Bj+_r__Suspmded :':i FHA IPlpl,:• A.Conj..Woll Unit Cb*Unlt Custom ReEH Convector H,m Pm,m Flreplaoe ;•!"+".!":..""""+'":"""":"'i *' ".i ".,:"........+:..':,+.:.,.|.+- .",,i +I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I i iyf-il I I I I I i%* I mw ib ,,h:',][•w\m\- 0 \ \ \L \; o4:-z 0 °-4 Zi / o rbo ,.j o 9C \;t\ :,• i ! ROAD SCHOOI WATER FIRE SEWER HOSPITAL AC LAND I BLDGS I TOTAL I BY ]DATE ]REASO. 6"O:!B "376()T 54320*082305--9167--0 819 METRO FK &PEt I"CD I FEE OWNER DATE•FILE #I PRICE /ZP ,/*."Ff 6 me77 (J \-:••.•i / AHD OG 9 9iNOD Hi 0.,'j O&1 GL'B dO ISIO i 69EG OV t zI N o MOD m iv 90 .T 79 od J ] ""'-r"/7 "7--,-'' PR R.l:r .0.I°"L°'" Zo.i.0 Co.....E-,t°,----Z-.,."-,C-E-F-''R°°-CLFI"Pl.,.J._LA --..,.P" ROOF CONSTRUCTION OR FINISHES No.ori°°Fromt-Joist "•'Ftr O Mpl°Both Flr 14°,RN.,I Rel,.C.o,e.GLIS Line f-1 Tub Reces°" Sosimimt °it Strait Fr*MeIol Did(Cemlnf .[Drn ELls. le.0fi¢°$Sq.Ft,"Sport TIrmXzQ Vlmifos TYPE OF COHSTRUCTION Effe©Ilve Age__Ylml Future LI|° LBIHG MO.FIxrll Toll°t,-Unals Tubi I.ol.°Pill. 6o.ln°Dr.Fro;.' Sinkl Woshos ..._.ryots . °Wtfl{lub](sloll) H.W.Tks __L'r-TmY MIIoI-PrIfob ."Mill Cston •,..",.'....,.I¢" Class A Rel.C,C.'.'-"' QUALITY-TYPE Good FOUNDATIOH Mud Sill E3 Post Pier I , BASE*t ENT Pgrl, b.Bammant $1 zl ,, ;G,.,°..r--.l No.c°,, PI,8L ..MISC TAHK$,Et°:ELEVATORS" mm "HC4'STS:EIIe.I all;_--F,g h EXTERIOR WALL CONST. E3 Double 6rick__ c..._----Pid-1 . Ps-Fob Mot01 Wood MotelTHt.Up plywood •.BlockEXTERIORFACING,m lid FLOOR CONSTRUCTION MIll 'Car O,ckR.Conc.--E),,.' ___5°ol "GLB, Corn1,t M?t°- Oil ..Gas •St..H.A. FHA Pipoless A Cnd._Woll Uni Comb.Unit..etm H Pump Fireplacl uFprlm Lamtn. Stu¢•.jSEok°Finish°d "Unfin;shed Marbl°crete X Painted VnI°d" Brl©k E3 Vene (.,.'E],.mk •:,,:"... CKSD PIERS WIRING -Birch--, ¼.-.q cd . •.:.M°tol pol,."-'--.d;,n.. Mlt.Jydr. Trid.Pll°'Tmb. £.col,s P°a GROUND FiOOR AREA L FLOOR AREA -,.':. ••,. I ,,- T '''|"II •d,.I ,...t ;',. i IL.I ;"-¢:..I 4 "t 't =:1,-.,..(¢ •'",, .,.. ,FiIJ, L?k ,j 31 !V,, ...; ./J- •.:;t,,i,•,, ...•-T..-.......•,-... I I I i I I i i I i I I 1 i i I I i I I I I I I / I."'I ' \ r 0 0 D Z nlrq t \ .4m 0 • -I z" '\ --4 a •:' ......'.,,:i2J}f m I I I I.,.,+-",D,,O ,'D"+'"7"+0""i"I0,+..,i++.U".,,...o,.,.__E'+'.8'o<k--=.'-'"|-PER,",NO.I .T..'..,__.+'=__".o,.J--" I °"I CendiPion of Ec,lrlo+Inmlrlor Fridi,ion 'T Floor PhlmzGood Acc=pv.#/Pi,ir ,' USE .J''C )."..ROOFCONSTRUCTION FLOORFINISHE$CTIIo(LI.m(FIm.PLUMBING _ #No:s,',i,,/"F.i-,+',"L'F"O "®"I--1 e.+'',"L-"°-,'.'''II .....o.Ro.;,.....R.,c..t.-"CLe I----L,.[]+.+Tr+I__IT+......L__.IT.boL..,P--.--Bo,+mont '--$,.I F.l,.ti>',,h +/C,m.m tgr.g+0+In liar.">0,J.ln./D,,Fro,,+•N.o,,+..,++.•.....,.T .....<'"l--J+""ll""<..No.A,......I----1 -o."..'I "°"'"'c]v',:'[..o,--__._O..,.,-..o-.o-----ir+/v4,',,r o-,I I /I '-'l'*"`.''')--i.Os.O6,,.+"/IH.W.T+.ko Li.I,oo i ITyPEOFCONSTRUCTON"i i Lill llli iEIllclivlAllYIOul+l ],"lraw*t D.p.k,C:r.4.O*I'Oh.Dip.II Eo*Till iSl,'klor Syl. L MIIOI .ll I Il FA("1 +"1 i .!HEATING , "iill Clirucilom "-./--H.W..S...__N.A. >--CIos"A Rein.Cm,,.1 :".+,-ll'Sd++--#LIPiI°d | 1 Sill.lllo id Colic+.+"FNA Pl!llolillll I,m+'+m+Im m+++--1,.,.,c..+.,+,I__+,il ;I+!+l t +__N.,.--__,,,.,,...!FOUNDATION '+!,oo:.I:+¢t+t l.Z,t.-li+-'+-/I :,;,'Ic,..,c.Oa,+ck ]"......DC(;.....;.:'........ill"#-7,.<,,i++:-"',+.-7# :.•++++,+:°"]++++."•A+,.,.---,_72_="--,'."+'.'-. =--,-::.......t_,i -I-'----Ga,olr--]No.Cg,+MIS.i*atS,E¢.ELmVATOIS DOCKS AHD PIERS '1111140" A....+.+...<oh,.NO,polipenil l ]ce+••M.dr Colic Will&Bml CImltlil $1#v;co Rooms .+Dooi.Au MOI+Tli .Pill Tmbl..P"WltlnSl gXTERIOR WALL CONST. •-'Siil I [.Double $1ud Wglll Brick PSI.D •--Cone.__Pil.r Roi.Cone.$lilloo $1.Sil..Frml Pre-Fab M.,lol + Till.Up . ;"F;lllrWoll INTERIOR WA.L $&CEILING Sled Wood iilol ploitlr i Dl WIII l/Acid.Till<('#+1')Cotoill Ciilid /Plyod EXTERIOR FACING .,lid Block $iin Sod Pfed Lomin $1uco Shmkol-""Finilhld Uolinllhed Morbllc'lil i VP°intld V,nl ld Brlclc D Vloor Cc.Iil Co.c.Sik, FLOOR CONSTRUCTIOH Join,I:_I..O.C. _.Mill +Cr Dock "/R.Conc+--"Ell,+, $iell --GL B. ROOF COVERIHG ___,..Comp.Moil or • +c¢*+ INSULATION INTERIOR TRIM FIr t+Birch +.____.,MItll •lll<+d i+/Milol D+, Polnd"Unlim __$iopsSpled __Dollli+lino op'y Dick C.HIh GROUND FLOOR AREA SB TOTAL FLOOR AREA B ,+• 2 3 4 $"--:- 6 7 9 I0 II 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 2O 21 22 24 25 O.tlllls •r ;"G--."" .-- I I I I I I I I I i i I ,i 0 I C JJi C I. f r ..b j- J t-I °!I ttQ .•°"i,J1 (.n [• 0NN m 0I-1... tQ triOrjl° NI.cf Io i olOrl-O 0 ' ,< I I I I ! ! I I I I I I I I I I I I I I GEOENGINEERS APPENDIX D ZONING MAP g I l l l I iI, IH lia||lilHI I I I I I I i I I GEOENGINEERS I I I I I I I I I I A I FEMA FLOOD MAP I i' I To determine if flood insurance is available,contact an insurance agent or til the National Rood Insurance Program at (800}63B620. APPROXIMATE SCALE IN FEET 500 0 500 t'--=--I P--'-'I I----'1 I To determine if flood insurance is available,contact an insurance agent or call the National Flood Insurance Program at (g0g)63P6620. APPROXIMATE SCALE IN FEET 500 0 500 NATIONAL FLOOD INSURANCE PROGRAM FIRM FLOOD INSURANCE RATE MAP KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON AND INCORPORATED AREAS PANEL 664 OF 1725 (SEE MAP INDEX FOR PANELS NOT PRINTED) CONTAINS: COMMUNITY NUMBER PANEL SUFFIX KING COUNTY. UNINCORPORATED ARFJ 530071 0664 FRENTON,CiTY OF 0664 F MAP NUMBER 53033C0664 F MAP REVISED: MAY 16,1995 Federal Emergency Management Agency J NATIONAL FLOOD INSURANCE PROGRAM' FIRM FLOOD INSURANCE RATE MAP KING COUNTY,WASHINGTON AND INCORPORATED AREAS PANEL 977 OF 1725 (SEE MAP INDEX FOR PANELS NOT PRINTED) CONTAINS:COMMUNITY NUMBER PANEL SUFFIX KING COUNTY.UNINCORPORAD AREAS 530071 077 F RENTON,CITY OF 530(8 077 F MAP NUMBER 53033C09T/F MAP REVISED: MAY 16,1995 Federal Emergency Management Agency . J J STREET I I I I I i I I I I I I I I I I I I I GEOENGINEERS APPENDIX F WELL LOG SEARCH Page 1 of 1 [] Well Leg Locations •Watei Supply •Resoue Protection •Oecosined •MuliipI0 ikll Types /V Major Roads /-v"Streets []Sections citi ]Counfes Water Bodies ]Resaoir []Glacr []Rod< ]IsJand //Streams m http://apps.ecy.wa.gov/servletYcom.esri.esrimap.Esrimap?S erviceName=state_ov&ClientVe...1/6/2006 .€.,ImmC.r i {'Z-W,klld 1"mlllll ! Z li I I I"1:RIVED if!OCT O6 ,1T,mpmmm o(vnm "F/C Dp ma6an md wu,,m*--y=;,?i'-]Y=,i'],, •By whom? mmkI:....... MmuloF=vidn$CeOlolix/Enlinr Ll Il ULr'I.u;"r..L,ULUt.= I I.I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I ! I I I I GEOENGINEERS APPENDIX G WETLANDS DETERMINA T/ON LETTER I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I GEOENGINEERS MEMORANDUM 600 Stewart Street Seattle,WA Telephone:(206)728-2674 Fax:(206)-728-2732 FROM: DATE: FILE: SUBJECT: James T.Rybock December 15,2005 8335-003-01 T1 Proposed Lowe's Renton -Wetlands Determination Letter The Lowe's site in Renton (Section 8,T23N,R5E),there appear to be no wetlands or threatened or endangered species on or in the vicinity of the site.I have requested a report and map of Priority Habitat and Species (PHS)from the Washington Department offish and Wildlife,which when it arrives in about 2 weeks will allow me to confirm that preliminary finding. This preliminary finding was based on review of these online maps and databases: -aerial photography (TerraServer) -National Wetlands Inventory -StreamNet database -Washington Department of Natural Resources FPARS interactive mapping system -King County iMap (hydrography for Water Resource Inventory Area 8) The closest NWI-mapped wetlands are associated With the shoreline of Lake Washington,approximately 1,500 feet from the site.Based on the prior disturbance and uses ofthe site,it is unlikely that non- mapped wetlands occur on the site or in the immediate area that could be affected by site development. Furthermore,it is unlikely that any offsite wetlands would have regulated buffers that extend onto the site. The only species listed under the Endangered Species Act (ESA)that is known to occur within a mile of the site is the Puget Sound chinook salmon.This species is found in Lake Washington (about 1,500 feet from the site)and in the Cedar River (about 4,000 feet from the site).These occurrences are not close enough to affect development activities on the site. The WDNR map shows a small fish-bearing stream (about 5,000 feet long)running east of the site and parallel to 1-405 before it breaks away and flows into Lake Washington.None ofthe other maps show this feature,which suggests that it is either not present or is too small and insignificant to be mapped. Even if it is present,it is located no closer than about 400 feet from the site and is separated from the site by a row of large warehouses.Furthermore,it would not be large enough to support chinook salmon. The only other ESA-listed species that could has the potential to occur in the general site vicinity is the bald eagle,and the presence of an active bald eagle nest could limit development activities at certain times of year.However,the highly urbanized and industrialized nature of the area makes it highly unlikely that a bald eagle nest would be present anywhere near the site. Plcase contact me ifyou have any questions about the above. Jim James T.Rybock,PhD,CEP,Principal I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I 8335-003-01 T 1,December 15,2005 Page 2 GeoEngineers,Inc. 600 Stewart St.,Suite 1700 Seattle,WA 98101 206-239-3231 (office -direct line) 206-713-6700 (cell) 206-728-2732 (fax) jrybock(a,,geoenineer s.com www.eoenineers.com I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I GEOENGINEERS FIELD EXPLORATIONS I I I I I ! I I I I ! I I I I I I I APPENDIX H FIELD EXPLORATIONS MONITORING WELL CONSTRUCTION Monitoring wells were installed in three of the borings (B-4,B-5 and B-6)following drilling.The monitoring wells consist of 1-inch-diameter schedule 40 PVC pipe.The lower 5 to 10 feet of the pipe is slotted (0.02-inch slot width)to allow entry of water into the well.Clean 10-20 sand was placed in the borehole annulus surrounding the slotted portion of the PVC pipe.Bentonite chips were placed above the sand pack to form a surface seal.The monitoring wells are protected by at-grade steel monuments.A graphical representation of the installed monitoring wells is shown on the boring logs.Groundwater levels measured in the monitoring wells are presented in the report text. GROUNDWATER SAMPLING Groundwater samples were obtained from the monitoring well using low flow sampling equipment. Laboratory prepared bottles were completely filled to eliminate headspace and were kept cool during transport to the testing laboratory.Chain-of-custody procedures were observed during transport of the samples to the testing laboratory. INVESTIGATIVE WASTES Purge and decontamination water obtained during groundwater sampling was collected in 5 gallon buckets and is stored in GeoEngineers Redmond lab.The groundwater will be disposed off after reviewing the chemical analytical data. File No.8335-003-01 Page H-I GEOENGINEERMarch6,2006 I I I I I I I I I I i I I I I I I i I SOIL CLASSIFICATION CHART ADDITIONAL MATERIAL SYMBOLS MAJ SYMBOLS TYPICAL SYMBOLS TYPICAL OR DIVISIONS GRAPH LETTER DESCRIPTIONS GRA_PH LETTER DESCRIPTIONS J ILLRAOED GRAVELS,CAVEL.• CLEAN o )o GW =SNO MIX*TUnES ,--CC Cement ConcreteGRAVELGRAVELS)f GRAvNEDLL Y it..........)°°°°GP ;;::::,.s I SOILS o o AC Asphalt Concrete COARSE M 'LTY GVLS,GRAVII"-ND"GRAINED MORE THAN 50 GRAVELS TH G LT MLTUES CPJshed Rock/ OF COARSE FINESSOILSFRACTION Quarry SpalisRE$dhdEO ON NO ECtBL EAMOUNT :/f,{.........,.Topsoil/ ....TS Forest Duff/Sod'°.°.'."!WELLRA OEDSANOS,RA VErYCLEANSANE6:::-:::::SW SNDS MORETN SO SANDRETdNEDONNO ••,,,;0OSlEVE AND LITTLEONOFINES).i....i.i SP FOORLY.GRA]3EDAND$,SANDY GRAVELLY SANDSOtLS""" SM ...............MOREOFCOARSE i1 1 :fl I MIXTURESFRACTIONFINES PASSING NO 4 SIEVE CL,yEy SANDS $*ND.CL,yMIXTURES i NORNC SILTS,RK FLOUR,ML ClaYEY SILTSvTH uT [NIIG NIC CY LO lO SILTS LIQUID LIMIT CL EDIU PLAsTICr,GVE LW FINE AND UESSTA 5O CLAYS,ANDy CLAS,SlLWCLAYS, GRAINED CLAYS LEAN CLAYS SOILS OL CRC'=C SILTSANDORGANIC $rLY Cy$OFLOW P$TICrPr MfIRETNI 50 i I I MR DIATOMACEOUS SJL SOILS SILTS gOUlDUMIT /2 CH INORNIC JYS F HIGHANDGRATERTNJI5¢PITICICLAYS OH URr3ANICCLAySAND SILTSLFMDUMTOIGHlJSTICl]P PET,HUMU SWAMpSOtLS WLTHHIGHLYORGAMCSOILSPTH=C ORGANICCON[ENT$ NOTE:Multiple symbols are usedto indicate borderline or dual soil classifications -:-:-:-:,:-:-:-:-: Sampler Symbol Descdptions 2,4-Inch I,D.spilt barrel ]Standard Penetration Test (SPT) ]Shelby tube Piston Direct-Push ]Bulk or grab Blowcount is recorded for driven sampisrs as the number of blows required to advance sampler 12 inches (or distance noted).See exploration log for hammer weight and drop. A "P"indicates sampler pushed using the weight ofthe drill rig. _Measured groundwater level in _exploration,well,or piezometar _Groundwaterobserved at time ofexploration Perched water observed at time of exploration _Measured free product in well or plezometer Stratiqraphic Contact Distinct contact between soil strata or geologic units Gradual change between soil strata or geologic units ....Approximate location of soil stratachangewithinageologicsoilunit Laboratory /Field Tests %F Percentfines AL Atterberg limits CA Chemical analysis CP Laboratory compaction testCSConsolidationtest DS Direct shearHAHydrometeranalysisMCMoisturecontent MD Moisture content and dry densityOCOrganiccontent PM Permeability or hydraulic conductivity PP Pocket penetrometer SA Sieve analysis TX Triaxlal compression gc Unconfined compression VS Vane shear Sheen Classification NS No Visible Sheen SS Slight Sheen MS Moderate Sheen HS Heavy SheenNTNotTested NOTE;The reader must refer to the discussion in the report text and the logs of explorations for a proper understanding of subsurface cnditior[s.Descriptions on tle logs apply only at the specific exploratiort tocations and at the time the expIorations were made;they are not warranted to berepresentativeofsubsurfacecOnditionsatotherlocationsortimes. KEY TO EXPLORATION LOGS GEOENGINEER FIGURE H-1 1 ?l,e 0/03/06 ?ge,LCF I Dr°ilitagct°r Geologic Drill rno Hollow-stem Auger Auger 3 75 inch ID Hammer 'lb)hammer/30 (in)Data '-Data rope and cathead I i!'i'o"°°IE°n''u* Datum System "s o IIATEF ,L DESCRIF'TI •1.I.I .'s sphalt co :rei/I I I IIII s Ity f'me to tium smad with oc¢sio, :::.ve (medium Lseto dense,moist):fill' I 1 !::):!I=6.6 I :::' 'IllHt ,s,,wet)(up lluvialdepoalts) :d ,ater mea I on 01/03/06 I I I I I [No ire H-I for expl ,O L I !f .ooo...o..e/I Project: !L Project Location:I GEOENG,NEERS I Checked KGOBy Sampling SPTMethods 140 (Ib)hammer/30 (in)drop Ddlfing Deeprock XL Trailer-mountedEquipmentDrillRig Groundwater 23.5Elevation(ft.bgs) Easting(x): Northing(y): (D=€9 SAMPLES I 8 =MATERIAL DESCRIPTION---'E z c.--.-- _PC cn I--(.9-J oo-l l i I Nil AC 2 illches asphalt concrete /---\A I /I:ll.l SM -Brown silty fmeto medium stand with occasionalI/i}:)2.}_gravel(medium denseto dense,moist)(fill) 18 29 1 :: 1,,[7 /:.i.:..- m t4...I SM umlM:t -dense,wet)(upper alluvial deposits) Groundwater measured on 01/03/06 Note:See Figure H-I for explanation of symbols. WELL o_CONSTRUCTION> Steel surfae I-'J"mnurnent --eneret° .surfac seal --Bentoniteeal ,....".... Schedule 80'"PVC well:::::::':!:casing "1 :::':--::::::--10-20 sand -- .__•., -::::Y::::::: •.::.--"•Schedule 80 0 020-inch slot width -- •.:...:__...... Lowe's of Renton Renton,Washington Figure H-5 Project Number:8335-003-01 Sheet 1 of 1 I =,01/03/06 Lgged LCF Drilling Geologic Drill on Hollow-stem Auger I ;e?ct°r 3.75-inch ,D 0Haaamer :'br)a mnm;r/a3#e I) Data p Total Ground Sudace I vD::thca(ift)16.5 Datum/Elevati°n (it)32.5 Datum System I -i ?o IATEF ,L DESCRIFTI I ----!.m .,-t :h,sasphalt,ret0 i "'"-lit,fine to lr tm sand with grave (ml i::"i,I'5 s I loose 10 I ar ic matter q e,wet(u12er allu ial ( iTcl 7r,tT,3'E___-_SS S-ar dy silt (so medium stiff,wet) KI:FI 'i :sadvi Fadrgacmatte 0(; 15 ]I:iii.lin ) d ,ater meas [on 01/03/06 I o I 25! I o ! I oE tre H-I for expL O],. I LOG OF BORING B-5 I Project: I NGINEER i rr:]e:tt Checked KGO By Sampling SPT Methods 140 (Ib)hammer/30 (in)drop Drilling Deeprock XL Trailer-mounted Equipment Drill Rig Groundwater 25Elevation(it.bgs) Easing(x): Nohing(y): SAMPLES [WELL .l CONSTRUCTION "k =E MATERIAL DESCRIPTIONOzIo--.o_Steer sudace>--m .c:o_monument 0 --i AC l ½nches asphalt concrete /-[d_tT ,,,l -[[:'"-SM -Gray silty fine to medium sand with gravel (medium ,-¢s-cn%eta AI l :::dense moist)(fill)121 14 ]I:i1::1 -:%eant°ni`"- •_.,,,.',,_1 I ./I::H _pH-6.6 '7 --=u.8o- 5-.,/::--!:::::vc.o,,1 /.::_:iilii iili:.....- :':.:""::--10-20sandl""'--::"-:"baekfi --12 4 ::i ":"--':-'" 1 SM -;i:--10-•181 4 /r ......"'--:"--":':-•.,---7 org_anic matter l.se,wet(u12er alluvial dep_qsttsJ/-::::.::.-:.:Schedule SO - l /ML za Darkbrowneatsoft._wet____--_--_--_--_----_-i::::::=:::::::oPVCo n'/II _G'aysandysi(sol-tordiumstiff,wet)!i:ii::!:!:::::,mt*i,th /L |(-I -wet):::: 15"1 10 6/ii i}'('I ---Groundwater measured on 01/03/06 --...... Note:See Figure H-I for explanation of symbols. Lowe's of Renton Project Location:Renton,Washington Figure H-6 8335-003-01 Sheet 1 of 1 I I I I i I I I I I I I I I I I I I I Date(s)t311n'l¢R Logged lee Checked vrz-Odlled /I/v///v By L'/I By '""J" Drilling -•Drilling Sampling SPTContractorGeologicDrillMethodHollow-stem Auger Methods Auger 75 'h 113 Hammer 140 (Ib)hammer/30 (in)drop Drilling Deeprock XL Trailer-mountedData....-inc-.-Data rope and cathead Equipment Drill Rig Total 1 Ground Surface ,-,-Groundwater *)Depth (ft).v Elevation (ft)''-'Elevation (ft.bgs).... Vertical Datum/Easting(x): Datum System Northing(y): "-SAMPLES ,WELL .,"CONSTRUCTION .p =s I I I MATERIAL DESCRIPTION 8-:-I >°1 I I :=1 I o_I E -o./Steelsurface 70 'o ,-'--o.3J°v monument 0LI rim Ac =,¥,thce t o.ete =1 ..4V I /I I:l:.l.:Jt G,,-',i.=;,o 4 Lc°E':.,JA I /I II:.l:l.I SM Brownish gray silty fine to medium sand with gravel J t '° 10 27 /[Hil i (medium dense t°dense'm°ist)(fill)t Ilifl "t5243--sBeeanl'°nlm -1-inc3 ]8 t3 z %%",i *-pn =610 sing _ PT "'10-20 sand1-I /I i--1 Darkbrownpcat(mcdmrasufi:mozst)(upperalluvzaJ 1 ::I::q-',,,ql"l't I I1 ,oo,,+>].,!1 1 /L I I JJl"-matter (loose,wet)-I °°2°7in ''1 "1'//IiHI r 1 "°"°Groundwater measured on 01/03/06 ii Note SceFlgurcHlforcxplanatlonofsymbols. i/I Project:Lowe's of Renton ,J GEOF:NGINEERS i pr°jectL°cati°n:Renton,Washington [,1 Project Number:8335-003-01 Figure H-1 Sheet 1 of I I I I I i I I I I ! I I I I I I I I GEOENGiNEERS APPENDIX I CHEMICAL ANAL YTICAL PROGRAM I TM Sttes 11720 North Crek pkwy Nj Suite qO0,BO hell,WA 980|1-8244 425.420.9200 fax425.420.9210 SpoKar EaSt 11115 t4onomery,Suite B,Spokane,WA 99206-4776 509.924,9200 fox 509,9249290 portlmnd 9405 SW NlmJs Anue Baverton,OR97008-7132 503.906.9200 ax 503.906,9210 Bend 20332 Eml AVenue,Suite F-l,d*OR97701571 . $41833Z0 ax $4.,382.75 Anchcrage 2000 W IntenaUonal Alrpor R0ad,Suite #,-10,Ancet AK 99502-1119 907,$63.9200 tax 907.563.9210 I 27 January 2006 Prajakta Ghatpande Geo Engineers-Redmond 8410 154th Ave NE Redmond,WdUSA 98052 RE:Lowe's Renton I Enclosed are the results of analyses for samples received by the laboratory on you01/17/06 17:35.If have any questions concerning this report,please feel free to contact me. Sincerely, ! Jeff Gerdes Project Manager I I I I I I I ISeattle117;0 NoIth Creek N,Suite 400,BOUII,WA 98011-8244 ! 425"420"9200 x 425"420'9210 lSpokane11922E,1stkvent,.e,Spokane Valley,WA 99206-5302 509,924,9200 f-509.924.9290 portland 9405 SW NimbusAvenue.BeBverton.OR 97008-7132 503,906.9200 x .906.9210 N 20332 Em.Ae ,Tl F-l.Ben OR97701-$711 Am;barite 2000 W [neaUoe,Alq0orL P,ld,A-tO..elncho,ra AK 50Z-1119 907.$63.9200 fx 9tl7.563.910 Geo Engineers-Redmond Project:Love's Renton 8410 154thAvcNE ProjcctNtnb¢8335-0031 Reported: Redmond,WA/USA98052 Project Manager:PrajaktaGhatpand¢01/27/06 17:29 I IANALYTICALREPORTFORSAMPLES l slmplelD LaboratorylD Matrix DateSamplcd Da.--"I I MW-I B6A0339-01 Water 01117/06 13:50 01117106 17:35 MW-2 B6A0339-02 Water 01117/06 14:24 01117/06 17:35 MW-3 B6A0339-03 Water 01/17106 15:08 01/17/(36 17:35 North Creek Analytical -Bothell The results in thisreport applyto the samplesanalyzedin occordan with the chain of I I I I I I I I I I I I Jeff Gerdes,Project Manager custody document.Thisanalyticalreport mustbe reproduced in Its entirety. North Crk Analytl¢l,Inc. EnvironmentalI.aboraory Network Page 1 of 14 I I I ttl e pctland wwwonca/nbs.€om I Project:Lowe's Renton 2 Project Manager:Pmjakta Ghatpandc ! I ! 1! I ! ! ! ! I ! ! I JeffGerdes,project Man g 11720 NOff.h Crk PIO¢N Sut 400.Bothell,WA 98011-8244 425.420.9200 x 42,420.9210 5poltane 11922 E.1st Avenue,Spokane Valley,WA 99206-5302 S09.924.9200 fax 509.924.9290 9405 SW HImbs AVenUe,Beavlon,OR 97008-7132 503.906.9200 ax 503.906.9210 Bend 20332 Empire Avenue,Suite F=I,Bead,OR 97701=5711 541.3B3.9310 fax 541.382.7588Anrage2000W|ntematloral All,Oct Road,Suite A-0,¢o e,AK 9950Z-1119 907.563.9200 x907,$63.9210 Hydrocarbon Identification by Washington DOE Method NWTI'It-HCID North Creek Analytical -Bothell Limit Units Dilution Batch Prepared Analyzed Method Reported: 01/27/06 17:29 . 0.236 m8/I S°tsI 0.594 0.594 0.594 0.594 0.594 50-150 50-150 I 6A19004 01119/06 01/21/06 NWTPH-HCID 1)-17 1 6A 19004 01119/06 01/22/06 NWTPH-HCID I 6AI9004 01119/06 01/22/06 NWTPH*HCID The results in thisreport apply €othe samplesanalyzedin accordance with the chain of custodydocument.This analyticalreport must he reproduced in its enriret3 North Creek Analytical,Inc.Page 2 of 14 Environmental LbOratory Network I5eatUe117Z0NorthN,Suite 400,Bothell,WA98011-8244 I Spokane 1I922 E.1stAvenue,Spokane Valley,WA 99206-5302 509.924.9200 fax 509.924.9290 Fr,lmd 9405 /N I,J Arflue,Beavettot.OR 97008-7132 503.906.9200 fax 503.906.9210 Bld 20332 lrl A'vcnu qeJLte F-I,Utd,OR97701-5711 WWW.BCBISbS.€Om SAL3e3.9310 x L3a2.Tsee2000WNAb'portRoad,A-1O,le,AK 995D2-1119 go7.S63,g2co Pax 907.563.9210 • j:Lowe's RcntonG¢o Engineers -Redmond 84t0 154th Ave HE eroje Numb¢833503-0l Reported: Redmond,WA/USA98052 Froject Manag PrajaktaGhatpandc 01/27/06 17:29 Identified SemivolatilePetroleum Products by N,VTPH-Dx with Acid/Silica Gel Clean-up North Creek Analytical -Bothell I Analyte RcporlingResultLimit Units Dilution Batch Prepared Analyzed Method MW-l(B6A0339-01)Water Sampled:01/17/0613:50 Rccelved:01/17/0617:35 Lub¢Oil Range 0.742 0.472 mg/I 1 6A19004 01/25/06 01/26/06 NWTPH*Dx D-06 Diesel RangeHydrocarbons ND 0.236 I Surrogate:2-FBP 74.2 %50-150 Surrogate:Octacosane 103 %50-150 North Creek Analytical -Bothell The results in this report apply to the samplesanalyzedinaccordance with the chainof I I I I I I I I I I I JeffGcrdes,Project Manager custody document.Thisanalyticalreport mustbe reproduced in it entirety. North CreekAnalytlch 1n Enwironmental£aboratory Netaork Page 3 of 14 I I I I Geo Engineers -Redmond 8410 154th Ave NE Redmond,WA/USA 98052 nalyte Result MW.I (B6A0339-01)Water 1:50 I Silver ND Arsenic 0.0336 Barium 0.297 Cadmium ND Chromium 0.00642 Mercmy ND Lead ND Selenium 0.00262 MW-2 (B6A0339-02)Watel Silver ND Arsenic Barium Cadmium Chromium Mercury Lead Selenium MW-3 (B6A0339-03)Watt Silver Arsenic Barium CadmiumChromium Mercury LeadSelenium I I I North Creek Analytical -Bothell JeffGerdes,Project M g SeatUe 11720 Nofl {k Pkwy N,Suite400,Bothell.WA 98011-824a 425.420.9200 fax 425.420.9210 Spokane 1192Z .1st Avenue,S9okan Valley,WA 9920G-5302 509.924.9200 Pax 509.924.9290 portland .9405 SW Nimbus Avenue,Beaver(on,OR 97008-7132 503.906.9200 fax 503.906.9210 Bend 2033Z EmpireAvenue,Jtte F-I,5er.,OR 97701-5711 541.3B3.9310 fx 541.382.758BAnchor;tges 2000 W ttemational AirportROad,Suite A-10,AnchorDe,AK 99502-1119 907.563.9200 fax 907.563.9:10 Projw.t:Lowe'sRenton Project Numbm:8335-003-01 RepOrted: Project Managea:prajakta Ghatpande 01/27/06 17:29 Dissolved Metals by EPA 6000/7000 Series Methods North Creek Analytical -Bothell Reporting ] Limit Units Dilution Batch Prepared Analyzed Method Notes MW-I (B6A0339-01)Water Sampled:01117/06 13:50 Received:01117/06 17:35 6A18034 01118/06 01/20/06 EPA 6020 -Diss 01/19/06 0.00100 m 0,00100 0.0100 0,00100 0.00100 0.000200 0.00100 0.00100 MW-2 (B6A0339-02)Water Sampled:01/17/06 14:24 Received:01/17/06 17:35 0.0518 0.0708 ND 0.00194 ND ND ND 6A23037 01/23/06 01/23/96 EPA 7470A -Diss 6A18034 OillS/I 01119/06 EPA 6020 -Di 0.00100 m: 0.00100 0.0100 0.(30100 0.00100 0.000200 0.00100 0.00100 MW-3 (B6A0339-03)Water Sampled:01117/06 15:08 Received:01117106 17:35 I 6AIg034 01118/06 01/20/06 EPA 6020 -Diu 01119/06 6A23037 01/23/06 01/23/06 EPA 7470A-Diss 6A18034 01118/06 01119/06 EPA 6020 -Di lid 0.00100 ms/1 0.00790 0.00100 0.211 0.0100 ND 0.00100 0.00476 0.00100 ND 0.00¢200 ND 0.00100 0.00153 0,00100 6AI8034 01118/06 01/20/06 EPA 6020 -Diss 01119/06 6A23037 01/23/06 01/23/06 EPA 7470A -Di 6A18034 01118'06 01119/06 EPA 6020 -Diss The results in this report applyto thesamples analyzed in accordance with the chain of custody documenl.Thisanalytical report must be reproduced in JtsentireW. North Creek Analytical,Inc. Eowlronmental I-boratory NeOYR Page 4 of 14 Geo Engineers-Redmond 8410 154th Ave NE Redmond,WA/USA 98052 45.420.9200 fax4Z5.420.9210 509.924.9200 fax S09.924.9290 portland 9405 Nimbus A.aenue.,OR 97008-7132 503.906.9200 fax 503.906.9210 Bend 20332 Errtp[re AW.SU F°I,OR97701-571I 541.383.93t0 fax$41.382.75B8WWW'UOal41JS'COm Anchorg=zooow [n'.ar¢rt 'e'e A'1°"Anc'e'99°a'zlz9 9o7.5a3.900 [x 907;63.9;10 1 Project:Lowe'sRenton 1 Project NumbeE 8335-0034)1 Reported: ProjeaManage PrajaktaGhatpande 01/27/06 17229 !Volatile Organic Compounds by EPA Method 8260B North Creek Analytical -Bothell Repo,Analyte Result Limit Units D0uti Batch Prepaxed Alyzed Method MW-I (B6A03394)l)Water Sampled:'01/17/06 13:50 Received:01/17/06 17:35 Bromochloromethane ND 0.200 ug/I 6AI9020 01/|86 01/18/06 EPA 8200B Nol 1 I Bromodichloromethane ND 0.200 Bmmoform ND 0.200 Bromomethane ND 2.00 Carbon tetmehloride ND 0.200 Chlorobcnzene ND 0.200 Cidorthane 1.00 Chloroform ND 0.200 Chloromethane ND 1.00 Dibromcchloromethane ND 0.200 1,2-Dichlorobenzene ND 0.200 1,3-Dichlorobcnzene ND 0.200 IA-Dichlorobenzene ND 0.200 1,1 -Dichloroethane ND 0.200 1 2-Dichlomethane ND 0.200 I ,I-Diehloroethene ND 0.200 cis-1,2-Diehloroethen¢ND 0.200 trans-1.2-Dichloroethene ND 0.200 1,2-Dichlompropane ND 0.200 cis-1,3-Dichloropropcne ND 0.200 trans-1,3-Dichlompmpene ND 0.200 Methylene chloride lid 5.00 1,1,2,2.Tetmehloroethane ND 0.500 Tetrachloroethene ND 0.200 1,1,I-Trichloroethane ND 0.200 I,I ,2-Trichloroethane ND 0.200 Trichloroethene ND 0.200 Trichlomfluoromethane ND 0.500 Vinyl chloride ND 0.200 Surrogate:1,2-DCA-d4 101%70-130 Surrogate:Toluene-d8 99.2 *A 70-130 Surrogate:4-BFB 99.0 %70-130 I I I I I I, I I I I The results in this reportapplyto the samplesanalyzed#n accordance with the chainof INorthCreekAnalytical-Bothell JeffGcrdes,Project Manager custody document.This analyticalreport must be reproduced inits entirety. North Creek Arlytlcals Zne. EnvironmentalIboraforF eletworR Page 5 of 14 I I I l wwmdw,ncn{nbs.com Anal3ae 24 t 1 1 1 1 I I I I I ! ! ! JeffGerdes,Project Manag 11720 North CrkN,SuRe400.BotheR,WA 98011-8244 42S.420.200 x425.420.9210 1122 E.1 Avenue.Spokane Valley,WA 99206-$302 509.924.9200 xS09.924,9290 _attle Spokane porflamd 9405 SW Nimbus AVLmue,Be2raern.OR97008-7112 S03.906200 lx S03.906210 Bend 20332 EmplJ A-nue,Suite F-l,Bend,OR 9770t-5711 $41.3B3.9310 fax $41,82.75B8Anchorago2000WlnernonalAJrporRoad,Jlte A-10,AthorJ AK5r502-.119 907.5F3.9200 fx 907.$63.9210 Project:Lowe'sRenton Project Numbea:83354J031 Reported:01/27/06 17:29projectManageFPmjaklaGhalpande. Volatile Organic Compounds by EPA Method 8260B North Creek Analytical -Bothell Reporting [ Limit Units Dilution Batch Prepared Analyzed Method Notes MW.2(B6A0339-02)Water Sampled:01/17/0614:24 Re€tired:01/17/0617:35 6AI9020 01/18/06 01118/06 EPA 8260B0.200 - 0.200 0.200 2.00 0.200 0.200 1.00 0.200 1.00 0.200 0.200 0.200 0.200 0.200 0.200 0200 0.200 0.200 0.200 0.200 0.200 5.00 0.500 0.200 0200 0.200 0200 0.500 0.200 70-130 98.5%70ol30 100%70-130 Theresults in this reporlapplyto thesamplesanalyzedin accordance with the chainof custody document.Thts analyticalreport must be reproduced in its entire. NotCh Creek Analytll,In Envlronffcen,?,l I-aborory Nelaorl¢ Page 6 of 14 ISIHlttltt11720NorthCrkplcve4FI,ulte 400,PJol,c g,WA 98011-8244 T okBne 11922 E,1st Avenue,Spokane Valle,WA g9206-5302 509.924,92 fx 509.924.9290 pocUard 9405 S,V NL A'e,BPA'P,O11,OR97008-7|32 503,906,9200 fax 503.906,9210 N 20332 J#r A,re,Re F-l,Bsld,9701-1 | www.Bcalab$.eom S4L3.93SO 4sjs2.7seArhorag82000WIrctercwlcoflalAJrporRad,Re A-10,AJIOIOrage*AK S0-I 119 907.563.900 Pax907.563.9210 • Geo Enginee -Redmond le:Lowe's Renton 8410 154th Ave life ProjectNumbe 8335-0031 Reported: Redmond,WA/USA98052 ProjecMmagea PrajaktaGhatpande 01/27/06 17:29 • 1VolatileOrganicCompoundsbyEPAMethod8260B North Creek Analytical -Bothell Analye RepoingResultLimit Units Dilution Batch Pttpared Analyzed Method MW-3 (B6A0339-03)Water Sampled:01117/06 15:08 Received:01117/06 17:35 ug/I 6A19020 01118/06 01ll86 EPA 8260B IBromoehloromethaneND Bromodichloromethane ND Bromoform ND Bromomethane ND Carbon tetrachloride ND Chlorobenzene ND Chlorthane ND Chloroform ND Chloromethane ND Dibromochloromethane ND 1,2-Dichlorobenzene ND 1,3-Dichlorobenzene ND 1,4-Dichlorobermene ND 1,1-Diehloroethane ND 1,2-Diehloroethane ND I ,I-DicMoroethene ND eis-1,2-Diehloroethene ND trans-1,2-Diehloroethene ND 1,2-Dichloropropane ND cis-1,3-Dichloropropene ND trans-1,3-Dichloropropene ND Methylenechloride ND 1,1,2,2-Tetxachloroethane ND Tetrachloroethene 0,250 I,l,l-Triehloroethane ND 1,1,2-Tdehloroethane ND Triehloroethene NEt Trichlorofluoromethane lid Vinyl chloride ND Surrogate:1.2-DCA14 Surrogate:Toluene18 Surrogate:4-BFB 0.200 0.200 0.200 2.00 0.200 0.200 1.00 0.200 1.00 0.200 0.200 0.200 0.200 0.200 0.200 0.200 0.200 0.200 0.200 0.200 0.200 5.00 0.500 0.200 0.200 0.200 0.200 0.500 0.200 99.0 %70-130 99.5 %70-130 I01%70-130 I I I I I I I I I I North Creek Analytical -Barbell The result inthis report apply to the 3ample$analyzedinaccordancewith thechainof I JeffGerdes,Project Manager ¢ustedy document.Thisanalyticalreport must be reproducedin its entirety. North £reek Analytical,Tnc. Entironmenl £aboratory Nettork Page 7 of t4 I I I $eattle 1172Q North Ceek PiovyN,dl 400,Bothe|,WA 98011-8244 w.Dcalabs.cora A.chog:,I o,'I I I I I I I I I I JeffGerdes,Project Manager 425,42Q,9200 fax 425,420.9210 Spokanl 11922 E.15t A'nu e,SFkane Valley,WA 99206-5302 509.924.9200 fax 509.924.9290 portland 9405 SW Nimbus Ar e.De'er0rb OR 97008-7132 S03.906.9200 fax503.906.9210 Bend 20332 Empire Anue.SuiteF-l,8d,OR 97701-$711 541.383,9310 fax 541.382.75882000WInermoralAirportRoad,Sutte A 11),Anchorage,AK 99502-1119 907.563.9200 fax 907.563.9210 Project:Lowe's Renton Project Number:8335-003-01 Reporttd: Project Manag Prajakta Ghatpande 01/27/06 17:29 North Creek Analytical -Bothell Reporting Spike Source %REC RPD '1 Limit Units Level Result */*REC Limits RPD Limit Notes Prepared 01/19/06 UsingEPA 3520C 0.250 mg/l ND 0.630 ND 0.630 ND 0.630 ND 0630 ND 0.630 DET 0.250 88.0 50-150 DET 0.250 100 30-150 Source:B6A0362-0| ND 0.243 mg/l ND 44.0 50 ND 0.618 ND 252 50 ND 0.618 ND 35.3 50 ND 0.618 ND 53.4 50 Q-06 ND 0,6IS ND 47.9 50 ND 0.618 ND 86.4 50 Q-06 DET 0.245 80.8 50-150 DET 0.245 99.6 50-150 Page 8 of14 The results in this report applyto the samplesanalyzedinaccordance with the chainof custody document.This analyticalreport must be reproduced inits entirety North Creek Analy£icah Inc. Eglvirontnent31 Labortory Network ISeattle11720NorthCreekFY<wy N,5ulb 400,BotheJ,WA 98011-8244 I TI SpokanQ 11922 E.1st Avenue,Spokane VallEy.WA 99206-S02 509,924.9200 fax 509.924.9290 pofarl 9405 5W HnS Avenue,Eleot OR970087132 S03.906.9200 fax503.906,9210 202 Emr AvGJ e,Jl F-.6(1d OR 97702-5711 5413B3.9310 fax 541.382.7588www.BcalsJ$.cnm ,2ooo wlnm.,o r,t .su A-to.omae.<99so2"zz19 .907"563"9200 fax 907.563.g210 • Geo Engineers -Redmond Project:Lowe's Renton 8410 154thAveNE Proja Nurabe 8335-003)1 Reported: Redmond,WA/USAg8052 Project Managem prajaktaGhatpande 01/27/06 17:29 I Identified Semivolatile Petroleum Products by NWTPH-Dx with Acid/Silica Gel Clean-up -Quality Control North Creek Analytical -Bothell Reposing Spike Somme VdEC RPD [ i Units Level Resuh */EC Limits RPD Limit N(Xe IAnalyteResultLimit Batch 6A19004:Prepared 01119106 UsingEPA3520C Blank (6A19004-BLKI) Lube Oil Range ND 0.500 mgJ] Diesel Range Hydrocarbons ND 0.250 Surrogate:2-FBP 0.244 0.250 97.6 50-150 Surrogate:Octacoaane 0.296 0.250 118 50-150 LCS (6AIg004-BSI) Diesel Range Hydrocarbons 1.83 0250 mg/]2.00 91.5 45-119 Surrogate:2*FBP 0.236 0.250 94.4 50-130 LCS Dup (6AIg004-BSDI) DieselRzmga Hy,k,l-w L94 0.250 mgfl 2.00 97.0 45-119 5.84 35 Surrogate:2-FBP 0.261 0.250 104 50-150 I I I I I The results in this report applyto the samplesanalyzedin accordance with the chainof I I I I I I I INorthCreekAnalytical-Bothell JeffGerdes,Project Manager custodydocument.Th:sanalyticalreport must be reproducedin its entireO/. North CreekAnalytic.al,Znc* Environmental£aboralory Net'vcorl¢ Pe9ofl4 I I I ;elttle 14127!O20 09220 Crk Pk5,N0.lltO 400'BOthel'wA '8011-8244 I o.92,.,2oo.so,.__•,0.o°;,,,::;,.o on.oR,7oo8-' .ca,l Anchorage 2000 W Intmr.ationalAiriott Road.SuiteA-10,ArChorage*AK 99502-1)19 Prajecl Number:83354)03-01 Rrpented: ProjectManageaz PmjaktaGhatpande 01/27/06 17:29 52 li Control I I I I I ! I I I I ! I I JeffGerdes,Project Manag North Creek Analytical -Bothell Reporting Spike Source %PEC RPD I Limit Units LeVel Result */*REC Limits RPD Limit Noles Prepared 01118/06 UsingEPA 3005A 0.00100 mg/I 0.00100 0.0100 0.00100 0.00100 0.00100 0.00100 0.00100 mg/]0200 104 80-120 0.00100 0 200 105 80-120 0.0100 0.200 104.80-120 0.00100 0.200 104 00-120 0.00100 0.200 102 80-120 0.00100 0.200 105 80-120 0.00100 0.200 104 80-120 0.00100 m'l 0.200 104 80-120 0.00 20 O.00100 0.200 104 80-120 0.0100 0.200 105 80-120 0.00100 0.200 104 80-120 0.00100 0.200 102 $0-120 0.00100 0.200 i05 80-120 0.00100 0.200 104 80-120 Source:B6A0329*8 0.00100 mgJl 0A00 ND 3.62 33-122 Q-02 0.00100 O.lO0 0.00117 118 80-128 0.0100 0 100 0,1gl 100 75-120 0.00100 0.100 0.000120 97.5 60-125 0.00100 0.100 000212 08.9 75-125 0.00100 0.100 0000160 99.8 77-120 0.118 000100 0 100 0,00|59 116 64-143 The results in th:s report apply to the samples analyzedin accordance with the chain of custody document This analytical report must be reproducedinits ¢nnrety. Noah Crk AIy tiCal,Zoo"Page 1 0 of 14 Environmental £aboratory Neork 0.957 20 0.957 20 000 20 0.00 20 0.00 20 0.480 20 Ittln11720o[1 lk Pkwy N,Jl 400*eN*WA 911011-0244 ! 425"429'9200 hsx 42S'420"9210 ISpokan11922E.1stAvenue,SpokaneVal,WA 99206"5302 509.9241921]0 fax 509,92419290 portland 9405 SW Nlrixa$A':Ue*BeavertOff,OR970-7132 503,906,9200 x S03.906.9210 Bend 20332 Empbe A'lue,$ulte F-I,Bend,OR 97701-$711 www.ncstabs.com 4x..9]lo s4t-2.7seAndlocgl2000WIr.natJO'l&l AlrpGrt N,SU 1-10,Ag:lorage*AX02-1119 907.563.g200 fax 907.563.9210 IOEInA:R dmOnd Redmond,WAFOSA 98052 lhjcct:Lowe's Renton Project Number:8335d)03-01 Project Manag Prajakta Ghatpande Reported: 01/27/06 17:29 I IDissolvedMetalsbyEPA6000/7000 Series Methods -Quality Control North Creek Analytical -Bothell Isp,e yc D I 1Repotin8I"Units Level Result %RZC Limits RPD Limit NotesAnalyteResultLimit Batch 6A18034:Prepared 01/18106 Using EPA 3005A • Matrix Spike Dup (6AI8034-MSDI)Source:B6A0329-08 Silver 0.0434 0.0100 mgJ1 0.100 bid 43.4 33-122 169 30 Q-o/ Arsenic 0.120 0.00100 Banmn 0.283 0.0100 Cadmium 0,0977 0,00100 Chromium 0.102 0.00100 Lead 0.102 0.00100 Selenitm 0.120 0.00100 0.100 0.00117 I]9 80-128 0.837 20 0.100 0.101 102 75-120 0,709 20 0.100 0.000120 97.6 68-125 0.102 20 0A00 0.00212 99.9 75-125 0.985 20 0.100 0.000160 102 77-120 1.90 20 0.100 0.00159 118 64-143 1.68 20 Batch 6A23037:Prepared 01123106 UslngEPA 7470A Blank (6A23037-BLKI) Mcrcmy ND 0.000200 mg/I LCS (6A23037-BS1) Mercury 0.00500 0.000200 mg/I 0.00500 I00 80-120 Duplicate (6A23037-DUPt)Source:B6A03394)I Mcom?/ND 0.000200 mg/l ND 69.2 20 I I I I Matrix Spike (6A23037-MSI)Source:B6A0339-01 Mcrcmy North Creek Analytical -Bothall 0.00436 0.000200 mg/]0.00500 0.0000743 85,7 70-130 The results in this reportapplytothe samples anaed in accordancewith the chain of I I I I I I JeffGerdes,Project Manager •custodydocument.This analyticalreportmust bereproducedin its entirety. Noth creekArutyci¢,l,rnc. Etlvltonroenfl lborator¥NetYork Page 11 of 14 I I I TM |,,.,.°..,....°m ! a u]t I I I I ! I i I i I I I JeffGerdes,Project Manag Project Numbec 8335-003-01 Project Manage Pvajakta Ghatpande ttlQ 11720 North Creek N,SUI 400,Borlell,WA 98011-8244 425.420.92011 fx 425.420.9210 Spokane 11922 E+.st Avenue,Spokane Valley,WA 99206-$302 509.924.9200 x 509)24290 poctlamd 9405 SW NimbusAvenue,Beoverton,OR 97008-7132 503.906.9200 fax 503.906.92t0 Bend 20332 m0ire AVenue,Suite F-I,Bed.OR 97701-5711 $4L383.9310 ax 541.382.788Anchm'aOe 2000 W Internatorl Airport Road,SuRe A-IO,AnChorage,AK 99502-11l? 907.563.9200 fax 907+563.9210 Project:Low's Renton Reported: 01/27/06 17:29 Volatile Organic Compounds by EPA Method 8260B -Quality Control North Creek Analytical -Bothell Reporting Spike Smuce %P.EC RPD i Limit Units Level Result %REC Limits RPD Limit Notes I Prepared 01118106 Using EPA5030B u#0.200 0.200 0200 ZOO 0.200 0.200 1.00 0.200 L00 0.200 0.200 0.200 0.200 0.200 0.200 0.200 0.200 0.200 0.200 0.200 0.200 5,00 0.500 0.200 0.200 0.200 0.200 0.500 0.200 400 98.5 7130 40 98.0 7130 40.0 I01 70-130 The results in this report applyto the samples analyzed in accordance with the chain of custodydocument.This analyticalreportmust be reproduced inits entirety. North Creek Analytlcalt Znc, Environt)tentalLaboratoryNetwork Page l2 all4 Sete 11720 Nor CreekPlcwy N.5u 400,6°Ulell.WA 98011"8244 I l 425"420"9200 lx 425"420"9210 I]'T Spokane 11922 E.1st Avenue,Spokane varJey,WA 99206-5302 509,924,9200 x 509.924.9290 pm-Umnd 9405 SW NimbusA'.nue.OR97008-7132 503.906.9200 503.906.9210 Bend 20332 Emph A'ere.lte F-l.cl.OR 97701-$711 WWW.DCaJnbs.¢O s.3.9ao ,'-l.e2.TsmAnchorage2000WIremabonAJt Road.5ul A-10.Anchorage.AK 502"11 t9 907.563.9200 ax 907.563.910 Gco Engineers -Redmond Proj:Lowc's Rcnton 8410 154thAveNE ProjectNumb¢8335-003-01 R©garttd: Redmond,WAs'USA98052 Project Manager PrajaktaGhatpandc 01/27/06 17:29 1 1VolatileOrganicCompoundsbyEPAMethod8260B-Quality Control North Creek Analytical -Bothell Reporting Spike Sourc YdEC RPD [ Analyt¢Result Limit Units Level Result %R.EC Limits RPD Limit Notes Batch 6A19020:Prepared 01118/06 Using EPA 5030B LCS (6AIg020-BSI) Chlorobcnzcne 53.1 0.200 50.0 106 77-120 1,1-Dichlorocthen¢55.8 0.200 50.0 112 go-120 THchlorocthcne 55.0 0.200 50.0 110 80-120 Surngate:1,2-DC.4-d4 38.7 40.0 96.8 70-130 Surrogate:Toluene.el8 40.2 40.0 100 70-130 Surrogate:4-BFB 39.5 40.0 98.8 70-130 LCS Dup (6A19020-BSDI) Chlorobxz.cn 49.6 0,200 ug/]50,0 99.2 7%120 6.82 20 1.1-Dichlorochhen©51.0 0.200 50.0 ]02 80-]20 8.99 20 Trichlorocthene 51.1 0.200 50.0 102 80-120 7.35 20 Surrogate:1,2-DC<4 38.I 40.0 9S.2 70-130 Surrogate:ToluenedS 400 40.0 IO0 70-130 Surrogate:4-BFB 40.4 40.0 101 70-130 Matrix Spike (6AI9020-MSI)Sourc€:B6A0340-01REI Cblorobcnzce 5240 20.0 ug/]5000 ND 105 80-128 1,1-Dichlorocthcn¢5160 20.0 5000 ND 103 $9-158 Trichlococthcnc 5410 20.0 5000 ND 10g 80-126 Surrogate:1,2-DC.At4 36.3 40.0 90.8 70-130 Surrogate:Toluene-d8 29.5 40.0 98.8 70-130 Surrogate:4-BFB 40.7 40.0 102 70 130 Matrix Spike Dup (6A19020-MSDI)Source:B6A03404)IREI Chlorobenzcn¢5270 20.0 ug/1 5000 ND 105 80-128 0.571 20 l.I -Dichlorocthcnc 5060 20.0 5000 ND 101 59-158 1.96 30 TichlorocLhen¢5460 20.0 5000 ND 109 80-126 0.920 20 Surrogate:1,2-DC.A-d4 35.9 400 89.8 70-130 Surrogate:Toluene8 39,6 40.0 99.0 70-130 Surrogate:4-BFB 40.8 40.0 102 70-330 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 The results in thisreport app to thesamplesanazed inaccordancewith the chain of 1NorthCreekAnalytical-Bothell JeffGerdes,Project Mazaager custody document.Thisanalyticalrepor mustbe reproducedinits entireW. North CrnR Analytical,$n¢. EnvlrorlmentalI.rtory Neo¢ t Pagel3ofl4 1 1 I Seattle 11720 Nor Creek Ftwy N,Site 400,5oUll.WA9B011-8244 www.ncalahs.com |.. Notes and Definitions I S'° I ! I I I I I I I I I I JeffGerdes,Project Manager AnalyteNOT DETECTED at or abovethereporting limit 425,420.9200 fax425.420.9210 Spokane 11922 E.1st Avenue,Spokane Valley,WA 99206-$302 509.924,9200 fx 5Gg,924.92g0 portland 9405 SW Himlus ,venu e,Beaverton,OR970087132 503,906.9200 fax 503,906,9210 Bend 20332 Empire AVenue,SuiteF-I,Bend,OR 97701-5711 541.383.9310 fax 541,382.7588 Anchorage 2000 W International Airport ROad,Suite A-IO,Anchorage,AK 99502-1119 907.563.9200 Fax 907.563.9210 Project:Lowe's Renton Project Numb¢8335-003d)1 Reported: Project Maraget:pmjaktaGhatpande 01/27106 17:29 The results inthiJreport applyto the amples analyzedin accordance withthe chainof custody document.This onalyticolreport must be reproduced in its ¢ntireW. North CreekAnalytical,.rnc, Envlrotlmental Laboratory N£work Page 14 of 14 EEEE I Quantitation Report Data File :C:\HPCHEM\4\DATA\012106.SEC\A2106014-D vial:58 Acq On :21 Jan 2006 23:31 Operator:DEB Sample :B6A0339-01 Inst :GC-I Misc :IX NWTPH-HCID Water RSI Multiplr:1.00 IntFile :SURR.E Quant Time:Jan 22 12:32 2006 Quant Results File:HRI06.RES Qant Method :C:\HPCHEMk4\METHODS\HJE2106-M (Chemstation Integrator) Title :TPH-D Rear Method Last Update :Sat Jan 21 16:12:39 2006 Response via :Single Level Calibration DataAcq Meth :TFL3005.M volume Inj.: Signal Phase : signal Info :A2106014.DFID2B I450000, 400000i 350000 ] 300000. 250000 20O00O 150000 100000 50000. * 0pi JI o.m .,Q ....,'...,....,....=-"-r,,,,:..,....,..?..............,......,....9..'----":'.......-?".....:.:,;=0.()0 1.00 2.00 3.00 4.Q0 5.00 6.00 7.00 8.00 9.00 10.00 11.00 12.00 13.00 14.00 15.00 16.00 17.00 18.00 19.00 A2106014.D HRA2106.M Sun Jan 22 12:32:54 2006 Page 2 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I l I I I I I I l I I I I I I I I l I Quantitation Report Data File :C:\HPCHEM\4\DATA\012106.SEC\A2106015.D Vial:59 Acq On :22 Jan 2006 00:00 Operator:DEB Sample :B6A0339-02 Inst :GC-I Misc :IX NWTPH-HCID Water RSI Multiplr:1.00 IntFile :SUPq.E Quant Time:Jan 22 12:33 2006 Quant Results File:HRA/106.RES Quant Method :C:\HPCHEMk4kMETHODSkHRA2106-M (Chemstation Integrator) Title :TPH-D Rear Method Last Update :Sat Jan 21 16:12:39 2006 Response via :Single Level Calibration DataAcq Meth :TFL3005.M Volume Inj.: signal Phase : Signal Info : Response ;000001 I 450000 i 400000t ",. 350000 300000 250000 i 200000 I, t ! 150000 I , t loooool i ; ;i soooo i ! ( 0 r' Tim A210601S.D A2105015.D\FID2B ,i 'L" E ,,¢=,--._¢•. 0.00"1.00 ZOO 3.00 4.00 5.00 6.00 7.(8.00 9.00 I0.00 11.00 12.00 13.00 14.00 15,00 16.00 ILou i..uu HRA2106.M Sun Jan 22 12:32:59 2006 Page 2 Quantitation Report Data File :C:\HPCHEM\4\DATA\012106.SEC\A2106016.D Vial:60 Acq On :22 Jan 2006 00:29 Operator:DEB Sample :B6A0339-03 Inst :GC-I Misc :IX NWTpH-HCID Water R$1 Multiplr:1.00 IntFile :SD-RR.E Quant Time:Jan 22 12:33 2006 Quant Results File:HRA210S.RES Quant Method :C:\HPCHMk4kMETHODS\HRA2106.M (Chemstation Integrator) Title :TPH-D Rear Method Last Update :Sat Jan 21 16:12:39 2006 Response via :Single Level Calibration DataAcq Meth :TFL3005.M Volume Inj.: Signal Phase : Signal Info : pons A.2106016.UFID2B 550000. 500000 450000 400000 350000 300000 2500OO 2OOOO0 150000 100000 50000 ! o-J 2" rr,e 0.00 1.00 2.00 3.00 4.00 5.00 6.00 7.00 8.00 9.00 10.00 11.00 12.00 13.00 14.00 15.00 16,00 17.00 18.00 19.00 A2106016.D H-R-q2106.M Sun Jan 22 12:33:03 2006 Page 2 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I File :C:\HPCHEM\I\DATA\012606\A2606022.D Operator :GSM Acquired :1-26-06 20:36:36 using AcqMethod TFA0706.M Instrument :GC-9 Sample Name:b6a0339-01 Misc Info :ix nwtph-dx sg added on water Vial Number:17 A2506022.DFID1A 1.00 2.00 3.00 4.00 5.00 6.00 7.00 8.00 9.00 10.00 11.00 12.00 13.00 14.00 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I GEOENGINEERS REPORT LIMITATIONS AND GUIDELINES FOR USE I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I i I APPENDIX J REPORT LIMITATIONS AND GUIDELINES FOR USE4 This appendix provides information to help you manage your risks with respect to the use of this report. ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES ARE PERFORMED FOR SPECIFIC PURPOSES,PERSONS AND PROJECTS GeoEngineers has performed this Phase I ESA of the proposed 9.79-acre residential portion of the Proposed Lowe's Renton property located at the southeast corner of the intersection of North Park Drive and Garden Avenue Noah in Renton,Washington in general accordance with the scope and limitations of our proposal dated October 21,2005 and ASTM E 1527-00,Standard Practice for Phase l ESAs.This report has been prepared for the exclusive use ofLowe's HIW Inc.,their authorized agents and regulatory agencies.This report is not intended for use by others,and the information contained herein is not applicable to other sites. GeoEngineers structures our services to meet the specific needs of our clients.For example,an environmental site assessment study conducted for a property owner may not fulfill the needs of a prospective purchaser of the same property.Because each environmental study is unique,each environmental report is unique,prepared solely for the specific client and project site.No one except Lowe's HIW Inc.should rely on this environmental report without first conferring with GeoEngineers. This report should not be applied for any purpose or project except the one originally contemplated. THIS ENVIRONMENTAL REPORT IS BASED ON A UNIQUE SET OF PROJECT-SPECIFIC FACTORS This report has been prepared for the Proposed Lowe's Renton Site.GeoEngineers considered a number of unique,project-specific factors when establishing the scope of services for this project and report. Unless GeoEngineers specifically indicates otherwise,do not rely on this report if it was: •not prepared for you, •not prepared for your project, •not prepared for the specific site explored,or •completed before important project changes were made. If important changes are made to the project or site after the date of this report,GeoEngineers should be retained to review our interpretations and recommendations and to provide written modifications or confirmation,as appropriate. RELIANCE CONDITIONS FOR THIRD PARTIES Our report was prepared for the exclusive use of our Client.No other party may rely on the product of our services unless we agree in advance to such reliance in writing.This is to provide our firm with reasonable protection against open-ended liability claims by third parties with whom there would otherwise be no contractual limits to their actions.Within the limitations of scope,schedule and budget, our services have been executed in accordance with our Agreement with the Client and generally accepted environmental practices in this area at the time this report was prepared.. 4 Developed based on material provided by ASFE,Professional Firms Practicing in the Geosciences;www.asfe.org. Ip---=, Fife No.8335-003-01 Page J-I GEoENGINEER March 6,2006 I I I I I i I ! I I I I I I I I I I HISTORICAL INFORMATION PROVIDED BY OTHERS GeoEngineers makes no warranties or guarantees regarding the accuracy or completeness of information provided or compiled by others.The information presented in this report is based on the above-described research and a single recent site visit.GeoEngineers has relied upon information provided by others in our description of historical conditions and in our review of regulatory databases and files.The available data do not provide definitive information with regard to all past uses,operations or incidents at the site or adjacent properties. UNCERTAINTY REMAINS EVEN AFTER THIS STUDY IS COMPLETED No ESA can wholly eliminate uncertainty regarding the potential for recognized environmental conditions (RECs)or contamination in connection with a property.Performance of a Phase I ESA study is intended to reduce,but not eliminate,uncertainty regarding the potential for RECs in connection with a property. There is always a potential that areas with contamination that were not identified during this Phase I ESA exist at the site or in the study area.Our interpretation of subsurface conditions in this study is based on field observations and chemical analytical data from widely-spaced sampling locations.It is always possible that contamination exists in areas that were not explored,sampled or analyzed. ENVIRONMENTAL REGULATIONS ARE ALWAYS EVOLVING Some substances may be present in the site vicinity in quantities or under conditions that may have led,or may lead,to contamination of the subject site,but are not included in current local,state or federal regulatory definitions of hazardous substances or do not otherwise present current potential liability. GeoEngineers cannot be responsible if the standards for appropriate inquiry,or regulatory definitions of hazardous substance,change or if more stringent environmental standards are developed in the future. SITE CONDITIONS CAN CHANGE This environmental report is based on conditions that existed at the time the study was performed.The findings and conclusions of this report may be affected by the passage of time (for example,a Phase I ESA report is typically applicable for 180 days),by events such as a change in property use or occupancy, or by natural events,such as floods,earthquakes,slope instability or groundwater fluctuations.Always contact GeoEngineers before applying this report so that GeoEngineers may evaluate reliability of the report to changed conditions. SOIL AND GROUNDWATER END USE The cleanup levels referenced in this report are site-and situation-specific.The cleanup levels may not be applicable for other sites or for other on-site uses of the affected media (soil and/or groundwater).Note that hazardous substances may be present in some of the site soil and/or groundwater at detectable concentrations that are less than the referenced cleanup levels.GeoEngineers should be contacted prior to the export of soil or groundwater from the subject site or reuse of the affected media on site to evaluate the potential for associated environmental liabilities.We cannot be responsible for potential environmental liability arising out of the transfer of soil and/or groundwater from the subject site to another location or its reuse on site in instances that we were not aware of or could not control. File No.8335-003-01 Page J-2 GEOENGINEERSMarch20066, I I I I i I I I I i I I I i I I I i MOST ENVIRONMENTAL FINDINGS ARE PROFESSIONAL OPINIONS Our interpretations of subsurface conditions are based on field observations and chemical analytical data from widely spaced sampling locations at the site.Site exploration identifies subsurface conditions only at those points where subsurface tests are conducted or samples are taken.GeoEngineers reviewed field and laboratory data and then applied our professional judgment to render an opinion about subsurface conditions throughout the site.Actual subsurface conditions may differ -sometimes significantly-from those indicated in this report.Our report,conclusions and interpretations should not be construed as a warranty of the subsurface conditions. Do NOT REDRAW THE EXPLORATION LOGS Environmental scientists prepare final boring and testing logs based upon their interpretation of field logs and laboratory data.To prevent errors or omissions,the logs included in an environmental report should never be redrawn for inclusion in other design drawings.Only photographic or electronic reproduction is acceptable,but recognize that separating logs from the report can elevate risk. READ THESE PROVISIONS CLOSELY Some clients,design professionals and contractors may not recognize that the geoscience practices (geotechnical engineering,geology and environmental science)are far less exact than other engineering and natural science disciplines.This lack of understanding can create unrealistic expectations that could lead to disappointments,claims and disputes.GeoEngineers includes these explanatory "limitations" provisions in our reports to help reduce such risks.Please confer with GeoEngineers if you are unclear how these "Report Limitations and Guidelines for Use"apply to your project or site. GEOTECHNICAL,GEOLOGIC AND ENVIRONMENTAL REPORTS SHOULD NOT BE INTERCHANGED The equipment,techniques and personnel used to perform an environmental study differ significantly from those used to perform a geotechnical or geologic study and vice versa.For that reason,a geotechnical engineering or geologic report does not usually relate any environmental findings, conclusions or recommendations;e.g.,about the likelihood of encountering underground storage tanks or regulated contaminants.Similarly,environmental reports are not used to address gcotechnical or geologic concerns regarding a specific project. BIOLOGICAL POLLUTANTS GeoEngineers'Scope of Work specifically excludes the investigation,detection,prevention or assessment of the presence of Biological Pollutants.Accordingly,this report does not include any interpretations, recommendations,findings,or conclusions regarding the detecting,assessing,preventing or abating of Biological Pollutants and no conclusions or inferences should be drawn regarding Biological Pollutants, as they may relate to this project.The term "Biological Pollutants"includes,but is not limited to,molds, fungi,spores,bacteria,and viruses,and/or any of their byproducts. If Client desires these specialized services,they should be obtained from a consultant who offers services in this specialized field. File No.8335-003-01 Page ./-3 GEOENGtNEER March 6,2006 I I I I I | I I I I I I I I I I I I il 11235 S.E.6TH STREET SUITE 220 8ELLEVUE,WA 98004 T 425.453.9501 v 425.453.8208 WWW.PACLAN D.COM June 13,2006 Jennifer Henning,Senior Planner City of Renton 1055 South Grady Way Renton,WA 98055 CITY OF RENTONRECEIVED JUN 1 It 2006 BUILDINGDIVISION SENT VIA MAIL AND EMAIL Subject:Lowe's of Renton;Renton,Washington;LUA05-161,SA-H Site Plan Review &Master Site Plan Approval Review Comments Response Dear Ms.Henning: PACLAND is pleased to present this letter in response to the City of Renton's review comment letter,dated April 20,2006,for the above referenced project.Each of the City comments (summarized in bold)with the associated PACLAND responses have been listed below.It is our goal to obtain City concurrence that each comment has been addressed to the City's satisfaction and request that the City set the hearing date. 1.Building proximity to 72"city storm drainage pipe: Response:Per coordination with the City,this issue has been resolved by shifting the building 2'to the east and requiring that the building piers be augercast,not driven.The building will still be located within the drainage easement.To shift the building 2'to the east (15.8"from west property line),the fire lane on the east side of the building is being reduced to 18"(from 209.The City of Renton staff verbally approved the 18'fire lane width at a meeting on May 2,2006.The original geotechnical report and supplemental technical memo prepared by GeoEngineers,dated January 26,2006, validates the City's concerns regarding driven piles near the 72"diameter pipe and recommends that augercast piles be installed.The geotechnical memo,dated April 28, 2006 is attached for your records.The augercast piles will be approximately 5.5'from the existing pipe after the 2 foot building shift.The plans and specifications for this project will require the contractor to TV inspect the storm line prior to construction in the presence of the City inspector.The contractor will also be required to monitor the rim and invert elevations of the 72"storm pipe before,during and after the installation of the adjacent augercast piles. 2.Houser Way Modifications and North Driveway to Garden Avenue Location: Response:No modifications are proposed within the Houser Way Right of Way.A small triangular area of asphalt will be constructed within the BNSF Right of Way.A BNSF permit is currently being processed to accommodate the truck movement from the site onto eastbound Houser Way. On behalf of Lowe's and in response to the City's concerns,the traffic consultant, Kittelson &Associates,has prepared a technical memorandum,dated May 22,2006, I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I Page 2 Jennir Henning June l3,2006 that evaluates the Lowe's north driveway locations onto Garden Avenue.This memo has been submitted to the City.Per discussions with PACLAND,it is our understanding the City concurs with the conclusions in the Kittelson memo and the north driveway location is acceptable as illustrated on the attached Exhibit A,dated May 17,2006. 3.BNSF Easement for Truck Access: Response:The attached Boeing Access Grade Crossing Construction and Maintenance Easement from Burlington Northern in favor of the City,dated July 20,1993,provides access between Houser Way and the project site.As noted above and illustrated on the attached Houser Way Access Easement Exhibit,dated May 15,2006,a small triangular area of asphalt will be constructed in the BNSF right of way to accommodate the exiting truck movements.A BNSF permit is currently being processed to accommodate the truck movement from the site onto eastbound Houser Way. 4.Garden Ave.Landscape Strip/Sidewalk Connections: Response:A sidewalk and landscape strip will be constructed to generally match the frontage improvements along Garden Ave.adjacent to Fry's. 5.Site Sidewalk connections to Fry's and Garden Ave.: Response:The Lowe's proposed site sidewalk has been adjusted as illustrated on the Driveway Access Location Exhibit,dated May 17,2006 to line up with the sidewalk on the Fry's site.A sidewalk has also been added to make the connection from the front of the store to the Garden Ave sidewalk. 6.Loading Docks Screening Detail: Response:We have reviewed the Renton Municipal Code Sections 4-4-090,4-495 and 4-3-100 to verify that we have met the code requirements with respect to screening the loading area,outdoor storage areas and the refuse storage areas. The Landscape Plan submitted with the SEPA/Site Plan Review package along with the supplemental NW Corner Landscaping Exhibit,dated April 14,2006 (attached)provides vegetative screening from the right of way in accordance with the code requirements for the subject areas.The landscape buffer adjacent to Park Avenue provides for a triangular pattern of conifer plantings that comply with city code landscape requirements.A combination of 8'tall Austrian pine and Weeping Alaska cedar trees will provide for a sight obscuring screening of the adjacent truck docking area.The substantial change in grade rising from the west to the east also provides for a natural buffering of this area.For further buffering arborvitae,columnar tree plants,have been designed near the intersection of Garden Ave.and Park Ave.to visual block view into the truck well area. I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I Page 3 Jennir Henning June 13,2006 Please contact me at 425-453-9501 should you have any questions or need additional information in response to the City comment letter.We would appreciate it if you could get the hearing date scheduled at the as soon as possible to keep the project moving forward. Thank you. Sincerely, Mike Neer,P.E. Project Manager MN:mn 2005127.014.00/RNLOjhlt.doc I I I I I I I I April28,2006 Lowe's tlIW Inc. c/o PacLand 11235 SE 6th Street,Suite 220 Bellevue,Washington 98004 Atention"PaulManzer and Ste3te Pesee GEOENGINEER I I I I I I I I I Subject:FoundationSupport,Options Lowers ofRentdn Renton,Wasiiigt0n GEl File No.8335-003-00 LUA05-t61,SA-H The purpose of this letter is to provide additional information related to the foundation suppert options presented in our geoteehnical report for the project dated January 26,2006 This letter also is intended to address the concerns raised by the City ofRenton in.flaeirletter dated April 20,2006 regarding potentiaii impacts ofbuilding foundations.on the 72-inch stormwater pipe located in Garden Avenue Northl The Ci ..S ised:a V'a !id iue concemi!)g 1:tl aets of pi!e!rig adjaeem Wthe storm water pipe.s oiscussel in:Section 4A.2:6 ofburgeoteelmical repert,we:also.identified p0tential risks6fpiie driving adjacent to the pipe and provided recommendations for documenting the-cOndition of the pipe. Theintent of our report s to provide potential opti0ns.tq allow the design team to make an educated decision with regard to foundation support:Although driven piles are.a possible foundation support option for the project,Secfi0n 4.4.2.1 of our-report states our opinion that augereast piles are the most appropriate foundation support option.Augercast piles are generally much more cost effective that driven piles and wiilresuitnln¢g!{giblerisk of daiimge tothr/2-ineh Storm waterpipe. Augercast pile'insiallation consists of dri!ling ahole to the desired depth with a continuous-flight hollow- stem auger and then filling the drilled hole,withconerete as the augerAswithdrawn.The continuous- flight auger maintains driiih01e stability,esseritially !atiytg the risk 0fearing Soils.Also,placement Of the eoncrete:as the.auger:is withdrawn will also maintain driilhole staii.ty.:Tis:will be pacularly |mpertant as the drillholes will be located approximately 3"-6"from the edge of the storm water pipe. There is also minima!vibration during pile installation because the piles are installed using drilling equipment,rather than driving equipment. The design 0fthe piles has'ken into account the pgteritially liquefiable,soils at the:site:"As discussed in Section 4.4.2.2,we recommended that the piles extend.at'least 10 feet iow the potentiaiiy liquefiable soils.If liquefaction does occur during an earthquake,the building loads will be supported by the piles embedded in the non-!iquefiable soils avdepth.As designed,settlement-ofthe pile supported building will he minimal.during Oi"tbllowing an earthquake and will notaffect:the post-cbnstrucfion stability 'or integrity ofthe pipe. LOWe's HIW,Inc. Page 2 I The City has also raiseda concern regarding the City's ability to conduct future in ground work for pipe maintenance or lxplacement in close proximity to the building.As discussed in theprevious paragraph'I at 'the building will be pile suppoi'ted and the pileswill extend clown to compet,ent soils depth.As long as adequate a'ench support (trench boxes,trench shields,letc:)is provided as pa 0f film.re excavation for the storm water pipe,the excavation adjacent to the building will have little,effect on the buildingperformance............... We understand that augercast.piles have been selected for support of the building,and as such,it is our opmton that,tl'Aere vyill be a :1 riskof damage :as a,result of soii 'instability.(either during or after construction)on the adjacent:72-inch storm water pipe. We trust this letter serves your current needs:'Please call if you have any questions or require additional information. Respectfully submitted, I o 0 ooo,, o ,,.It SDS:ja I Rdrn:'O0fnxalsx,g33500300Ldoc IJIRES ,01-O "l File No.8335.003.00 GEOENGINEERS I I I I ®KITTELSON &ASSOCIATES,INC. TRANSPORTATION PLANNING/TRAFFIC ENGINEERING 610 SW ALDER,SUWE700 •PORTLANO,OR97205 ,(503)228-5230 -FAX(503)273-816g MEMORANDUMI I I I I I I Date: To: From: Cc: Project: Subject: May 22,2006 Project #:7662.03 Rich Perteet,City of Renton Ben Wolters,City of Renton Anthony Yi &Marc Butorac,P.E.,P.T.O.E. Keri Weaver,City of Renton Jan Illian,City of Renton Jim Manion,Lowe's HIW,Inc. Bynum Marshall,Lowe's HIW,Inc. Paul Manzer,PacLand Steve Pesce,PacLand Renton Lowe's Proposed Lowe's Northern Driveway Location on Garden Avenue I I I I I I I Pursuant to your request,we have prepared this supplemental memorandum to provide a qualitative assessment of the proposed driveways along Garden Avenue as it relates to the Lowe's and The Landing development plans.This memorandum serves as a supplement to the February 2006 Transportation Impact Analysis (TIA)prepared for the proposed Lowe's development and summarizes the transportation issue you raised regarding access locations along Garden Avenue and our corresponding response. Background Appendix "A"provides the proposed Lowe's development plan and includes the proposed driveway locations for The Landing based on a site plan provided by city staff.As shown in the figure,access to The Landing is proposed via three driveways along Garden Avenue between Park Avenue and the existing Fry's Electronics driveway.Based on discussions with city staff, the northern and southern driveways will service two proposed multi-family residential developments,and the center driveway will service a private street being proposed by The Landing. The Landing's proposed private street is approximately 100-feet (measurement taken from the driveway centerlines)south of the proposed Lowe's northern driveway.Based on discussion with city staff,the City of Renton Transportation Planning staff has concerns with the proposed tt:rojfile17662 -Renton Lowe'slreportlGarden Driveways17662_Garden driveways.doe I I Renton Lowe's May 22,2006 Project #:7662.03 Page 2 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I alignment of the Lowe's northern driveway onto Garden Avenue as it relates to the proposed driveway locations for The Landing development plan.City staff has concerns with the two proposed driveways being off-set from one another. Lowe's Development Plan Lowe's HIW,Inc.is proposing to develop a home improvement store to be located in the southeast quadrant of the Park Avenue/Garden Avenue intersection.As shown in the proposed Lowe's site plan provided in Appendix "A",the development plan calls for constructing a new Lowe's building on the north end of the site,a garden center along the east side,and the parking field located on the south side of the main building.Access to the Lowe's site is proposed via two driveways on Garden Avenue,one of which would be a shared driveway (southern driveway)with the existing Fry's Electronics. The northern driveway is proposed immediately south of the Lowe's building in order to maintain adequate on-site circulation and parking field.The Lowe's development plan currently provides 410 parking spaces (3.2 spaces per 1,000 square-feet),which is at the lower end of what Lowe's typically provides for a store of this nature.Relocating the Lowe's northern driveway opposite of The Landing's proposed center driveway (as shown in Appendix "B")would result in a net loss of 22 parking spaces,thus bringing the total number of parking spaces to 388 (3.0 spaces per 1,000 square-feet)and creating an unacceptable parking situation for Lowe's. The length and depth of the proposed site limits how the Lowe's building can be configured. Based on an evaluation of the site,the proposed orientation was identified as the only feasible option that could adequately accommodate the Lowe's building and adjacent Fry's Electronics. Locating the Lowe's building on the south end of the site with the parking field located on the north side of the main building is not feasible because it eliminates the ability to utilize a shared parking field and driveway with the existing Fry's Electronics.It also forces all internal traffic between the Lowe's and Fry's Electronics onto Garden Avenue,thus increasing overall traffÉc levels and turning movements along Garden Avenue.In addition,having the Lowe's building situated on the south end of the site forces the proposed Lowe's northern driveway closer to the Garden Avenue/Park Avenue intersection,thus minimizing the vehicle queue storage for the northbound approach at the Garden Avenue/Park Avenue intersection and is inconsistent with the existing driveway spacings along Garden Avenue between Park Avenue and 8th Street. The Landing Development Plan General development information and traffic volume data related specifically to the proposed residential uses and The Landing's three proposed driveways were requested by the Lowe's project team;however,no data was available at the time of the request or during the preparation of this memorandum.According to city staff,a detailed development plan and traffic analysis is currently being prepared by The Landing project team. Based on the site plan provided by city staff,The Landing development plan (as shown in Appendix "C'),shows three proposed driveways along Garden Avenue between Park Avenue and the existing Fry's Electronics driveway;however,it does not provide any detailed information related to the proposed residential uses.The northern and southem driveways will Kittelson &Associates.Inc.Portland,Oregon Renton Lowe's May 22,2006 Project#."7662.03 Page 3 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I service two proposed multi-family residential developments,and the center driveway will service a private street.Based on conversations with city staffand a review of The Landing site plan,the proposed internal private street will likely be a relative low volume street due to the fact that all other uses identified on The Landing development plan have alternate and more convenient connections to the surrounding street network versus using the proposed private street,and no residential access points are proposed along the private street;therefore,it will only service through traffic. As shown in The Landing site plan,the western terminus of the private street to Park Avenue North is restricted to fight-in,fight-out only movements (see Appendix "C');therefore,limiting the overall usage of the private street.Also,more convenient connections to the surrounding street network will be provided versus using the proposed private street based on a qualitative review of the site plan and overall proposed street network.As such,assuming the private street is not critical to the overall operations of The Landing development based on the information received to date,alternatives to relocating the Lowe's northern driveway opposite of The Landing's proposed private street should be considered.One alternative could include eliminating the private street connection to Garden Avenue and developing a pedestrian corridor to service the two residential uses. As mentioned previously,alternative site configurations were considered tbr the Lowe's development,including the City's suggestion of relocating the Lowe's northern driveway opposite of The Landing's proposed private street,however,all were proven to be unacceptable from both parking and circulation perspectives. Proposed Driveway Locations along Garden Avenue Garden Avenue is classified as a Minor Arterial with a posted speed of 25 miles per hour and a four-lane cross-section.As mentioned previously,The Landing development plan shows three proposed driveways along Garden Avenue between Park Avenue and the existing Fry's Electronics.Lowe's is proposing a driveway located approximately 100-feet north of The Landing's private street,just south of the proposed northern residential driveway.Not only is the proposed location of the Lowe's northern driveway consistent with the existing driveway spacing along Garden Avenue between Park Avenue and 8th Street,but in the event the Garden Avenue/Fry's Electronics driveway intersection is signalized in the future,the proposed Lowe's northern driveway location will maximize vehicle storage along Garden Avenue between the Garden Avenue/Fry's Electronics driveway and Garden Avenue/Park Avenue intersections. In order to maintain the intended form and function of Garden Avenue as a minor arterial and assuming The Landing's private street will experience low traffic volumes under its current configuration,it is recommended that the proposed northern and southern residential driveways be relocated to access onto the proposed internal private street.Consolidating the proposed driveways along Garden Avenue between Park Avenue and the existing Fry's Electronics driveway will enhance overall traffic operations and safety by reducing the number of conflict points. In addition,should the proposed private street connection to Garden Avenue remain,it is recommended that the proposed private street be relocated opposite of the proposed Lowe's Kittelson &Associates,Inc.Portland,Oregon I i Renton Lowe's May 22,2006 Project #:7662.03 Page 4 I I I I I I I I I I ! I I I I I northem driveway due to the fact that alternative site configurations have been considered for the Lowe's development,including the City's suggestion of relocating the Lowe's northern driveway opposite of The Landing's proposed private street,and all were proven to be unacceptable from both parking and circulation perspectives.Appendix "D"provides a schematic drawing ofthis concept along Garden Avenue.Also,based on conversations with city staff the proposed The Landing residential uses and access configuration are currently being developed and thus could likely be modified to better suite the overall transportation system. Conclusion Based on the information available pertaining to The Landing development plan and the evaluation of whether the proposed Lowe's northern driveway can be relocated opposite of The Landing's private street,it is our recommendation that the proposed location of the Lowe's northern driveway be maintained for the following reasons. •The proposed Lowe's site plan is fully development.Alternative site configurations were considered,however,all were proven to be unacceptable from both parking and circulation perspectives. •Based on conversations with city staff,the proposed The Landing residential uses and access configuration are currently being developed and thus could likely be modified to better suite the overall transportation system. •Based on conversations with city staff and a review of The Landing site plan,the proposed internal private street is currently configured to service limited travel routes and will likely be a relative low volume street;therefore,it could be reconfigured to better serve The Landing development and surrounding street network. •Consolidating the proposed driveways along Garden Avenue between Park Avenue and the existing Fry's Electronics driveway will enhance overall traffic operations and safety by reducing the number of conflict points. •The proposed location of the Lowe's northern driveway is consistent with the existing driveway spacings along Garden Avenue between Park Avenue and 8th Street. Lastly,we recommend that the Lowe's project team,The Landing project team,and City of Renton staff collaboratively work on developing an access scheme that accommodates both development plans,maintains the overall form and function of Garden Avenue,and enhances the surrounding transportation network. We trust that this supplemental memorandum provides you with the necessary information to complete your staff report on the proposed Lowe's development and to schedule the pending public hearing.Ifyou have any further questions,please call us at (503)228-5230. Kittelson &Associates,lnc.Portland,Oregon I I I I I I I I I I I I I ! I I I I I Appendix A Proposed Lowe's Development Plan w/The Landing Driveways I I I I I I I < iii z0 zzo < <,,, 0 < z <.mI12 iii b£ | g- OMG6OX3OqNa\X3\OM\3AV N3aVO\SOq\NOLN3a\VM\8 I I I I I i I I I I I I I I I I I I I Appendix B Proposed Lowe's Development Plan w/Relocated Northern Driveway Driveways I I I I I I I I :!i+: LU o+o o ,,+,Moo i nl o bo I I LOX3OINJ\X3\DAC]C\3AV N3C];V9\S3AOI\NOI N3J\Vg\8 I I I I I ! I I I I I I I I I I I I I Appendix C The Landing Development Plan \ I I I I I i I I I I I I I I I I I I I Appendix D Garden Avenue Concept Plan I I I I"1Cl #t \t \ t\ \\ X\ V _LISIHXq 3NIq ,/N IS3M 900-g.- L NgIs NOl,kd g31N33 9NIddOHS S / -_I JINISISV3NOIOFIISN03,kVtOdb3i Sr/OA}dd JSN8 ONJ llrtN]d SONISSONO ]lVAINd @3NJF/O3N--S ... M/El O9 aVOI-I-IIVI::I NW3HIEION NO/ONIqI=II78 ]lOd NOISSI#SNVN!z " HOIH (]V]HfJ3AO / IJ 0(3 =qau!l (13A NI ) LqVD£DIHdVt9 9NIISIX]OLNI 311 , ,,.1..I I I I I I I I e$o/To0l LO/LOOi aosueJ *agKaa/9Q o;ue ;o X;TO OOELO(P;ZP xta (0;!00/Pl/¢0 I I I I i I I I I I I I I I I I I I CA&-93-027 CONSTRUCTION AND MAINTENANCE AGREEMENT CONSTRUCTION OF THE BOEING ACCESS GRADE CROSSINGS (MP 3.90 &3.93)RENTON.WASHINGTON Agreement made thls/day of te ,1993,betWeenRENTON, W.AS.H/NGT_ON,a mulicipal corporation,herlled the Agency .and theUUKUNrrONNORTHERNRALROADCOMPANY,a Delaware corporation here naf'cercalledthe"Railway" WlTNESSE'I'H: WH E REAS in the interest of aiding motor vehicle traffic,the Agency is proposing the construction of 'wo public grade crossings,designated as,te BoeingAccessRoad,where the centerline of the roadway will cross the Railway s right-of-way and tracks at two locations on the PacificWoodinvil[e Subdivision.The crossings are located at Railway Survey Station 742 +22,MP 3 +5334'MP 3.90 and at Railway Survey Station 740+22,MP 3 +5134,MP 3.g3,in Lot I,ofSection 8 Twp.23N;.Age.SE.,W.M., in Renton,Washington,at the ]ocation shown on map marked Exhibit A-1 attachedheretoandmadeaparthereof;and WHEREAS,the Agency desires to acquire an easement for roadway purposesacrossthesurfaceoftheRai]way's right-of-way;and WHEREAS,in connection with the project for the conruction of the BoeingAccessRoadcrossingsitwillbenecessarytoinstallautomaticflashingighttraffic control devices four shoulder mount type with 2 gates and train activation devicesherenaftertobecalledSignas";and" WHEREAS.the Railway will be required to perform certain work on itsfadlities;and WHEREAS.the parties hereto desire that the work to be performed bytheAgencyinconnectionwithsaidconstructonbeperformedinaccordancewithplansandspecificationstobepreparedbytheAgency.and WHEREAS the parties hereto desire that the plans and specifications for theinstaatonofsaidSignalsbepreparedbytheRailway;and WHEREAS the parties hereto agree thatthe Ra waywill receive noascertanablebenefitfromtheconstructionofsaidproject,and WHEREAS,the Agency s willing to undertake the construction of said projectwithAgencyfundsandsuchfederalfundsasmaybeavailableforthspurposepursuant to the Federal Highway Acts applicable thereto,and the Railway is willing to consent totheexecutionofthesaidprojectuponthetermsandconditions.hereinstated and notothenNise;and WHEREAS.the parties hereto desire to contract with reference to the worktobedonebyeachoftheminconnectiontherewiththeprotectionofRailwayfacilities and the paymentof costs and expenses therein involved; NOW,THEREFORE,in consideration of the mutual covenants hereincontained,it is mutually agreed as follows: The Railway shall grant to the Agency,for and in consideration of $38 300.00 by parate ins_ZrU.men,t an easement for roadway puoses only upon and ac surrace oT the t(a,way s nght-of-way as shown on Exhibit A"attached hereto andmadeaparthereof. The Railway shall grant to the Agency,for and n consideration of $13,700.00 by separate instrument a tempera ry constru,ction permint for roadway purpesony upon and across the surface of the Railway s right-of.way as shown on Exhibit A"attached hereto and made a part hereof. I! The Aency shall perform ts work in accordance with detailed plans and specifications which shall be prepared by the Agencyand submitted to the Manager pawaagency 1 L0/00 JeSUeJ •X¥IL:L 00/L/0 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I Engineering ofthe Railway for approval a nd approved by it when such plans and specificationsareapplicable oraffect any right-of.wayorfacilityofthe Railway and noworkpursuanttosaidplansandspecificatonsshallbeperformedontheright-of-wayoftheRailwaypriortoreceiptofnoticestoproceedgivenbythesaidManagerEngineeringtotheAgencyengineerortheirrespectiveauthorizedrepresentatives.Nothing provided in this agreement with respect to said plans and specifications shallbeconstruedordeemedtobearatlflcatonoranadoptionbytheRailwayoreitherorbothsaidplansasitsown. {11 follows:The Agencyand the Railway shall perform the various items of work as I.WORK TO BE PERFORMED AND MATERIALS TO BE FURNISHED By THE AGENCY ORITSCONTRACTORATAGENCYEXPENSE. 1.Except as otherwise herein provided,furn sh all plans,engineering,supervision,labor,material,supplies and equipment necessaryforconstructionoftheproject. 2.Do all grading of the roadway approachesto the crossing and furnish andplacepavinguptothecrossing. 3.Provide all drainage structures underthe roadway,if required. 4.Furnish and place advance warning s gns and standard pavement markingsforraIroadgradecrossings. 5.Perform all other work not specifical y mentioned as work to be performedbytheRailwaynecessarytocornpetetheprojectnaccordancewiththeplansandspecflcations. IL WORK TO BE PERFORMED AND MATERIALS TO BE FURNISHED By THE RAILWAYATAGENCYEXPENSE. 1.Track and Crossinq WorkCrossinqatMP3,90 Place a 48"rubbercrossing,replace 120TF of 115#rail with 120TF of 115#CWR,and rehabilitate crossing area w th newt es,ballast,fastenings andengineeringfabricfordralnagepurposes. Crossinq at MP 3.93 Place a 48"rubber crossing,replace 120TF of 115#rail with 120TF of 115#ONR,and rehabilitate cross ng area w th new t as,ballast,fastenings andengineeringfabricfordrainagepurposes. 2.crgssmq at MP 3.90 Instalt 1 automatic flashing light traffic control dev ce,shoulder mount typewithagateandtrainactrationdevices. Crossing at MP 3.93 Install 3 automaticflashing Jight traffic control devices,shoulder mounttype,with a gate and train activation devices. Crossinq of Lake Washington Boulevard at MP 3.97Upgradetrainactivationdevices. 3.FlaclJna.Protective S@ryices and Devices Perform flagging and furnish protect ve services and devices duringconstruction,account operations of the Agency or its contractor,as deemednecessarybytheRailway. 4.Engineerinq and Preoaration of Bills Perform preliminary and special eng nearing and inspection,including fieldandoffceworkandpreparationofbills. pawaagency 2 LO/t;O0 Js.sueJ XYJI PL:LL 9OO/t,L/ZO i I I I I i I I I I I I I I I I I I I IV •All work herein prov ded for,to be done by the Agency or its contractors OntheRailway's right-of-way,shall be performed bythe Agency Or its contractors in amannersatisfactorytotheRailwayandshabeperformedatsuchtimeandinsuchmannerasnottointerfereunnecessarilywiththemovementoftrainsortrafficuponthetracksoftheRailway.The Agency or ts contractors shall use all care and precaution necessaryto avoid accident,damage,or interference to the RaiJway's tracks or to thetrainsortrafficusingitstracksandnotifytheRailwayasufficienttimeinadvancewheneveritisabouttopenCormworkadjacenttoanytracktoenabletheRailwayto furnish flagging and such other protective services and devices as might be necessary toensuresafetyo7RailwayoperatonsandtheRawayshallhavetherighttofurnishallsuchflaggingorprotectiveservicesanddevicesasinitsjudgmentisnecessary,and theAgencyshallreimbursetheRailwayforthecostthereof.The Railway will submit bills for flagging and other protective services and devices currently during progress of the workcontemplatedbythisagreement.The Railway will submit complete billing forflaggingandotherprotectiveservicesanddevicesattheearliestpracticaldate,and the Agencyshallpaysuchbillspromptly.Attached hereto,marked Exhibit g ,and by thisreferencemadeaparthereof,s a statement of €onditiooswhen flagman andprotectiveservicesanddeviceswillbefurnishedbytheRaway.Wherever the,Safeguarding of trains or traffic of the Railway s ment oned in this agreement,it isisn:cnu ed"to cover and include all users of the Railway's tracks having permi,ion for V In accordance with FHPM 6-6-2-I,which by this reference is incorporated n thisagreement,the Railway will race ve no ascerta nab e net benefits from said project and,therefore,is not required to contribute to the cost of said project. VI The Agency,without expense to the Railway,shall secure from the owner or owners VII .The Signals shall be installed at the Railway grade crossings shown on ExhibitA-I in accordance with plans and estimates furnished by the Railway. The Railwayshall,with its own forces and under its own labor agreements,installtheSignalsandthecrossings.The Agency,with its own forces,shall furnish and installadvancewarningsignsandstandard-pavement markings for railroad crossings.TheRailwayshallfurnishallmaterialsforthenecessaryRailwayworkfromitsstorestock,orbypurchase,in accordance w th the provisions of FHPM 1-4-3 and any amendments andsupplementsthereto. VIII It is understood that Exh b t "C",attached hereto and made a part hereof,is acurrentestimateofthecostoftheworktobeperformedbytheRailwayatAgencyexpenseandisforinformationalpurposesonly. The Agency shall reimburse the Railwayfor a cost and expense incurred bytheRailwayinconnectonwiththeconstructonworkasindicatedinthisagreement.TheRailwaymaysubmitprogressbstotheAgencyduringtheprogressoftheworkincludedinthisagreementfortheactuacostofservicesandexpensesandtheAgencyshallpaysuchbillspromptly. It is further agreed that a final and complete billing of all actual ncurred costs andexpenses,ascertained in accordanee with the provisions of FHPM 1-4-3,wh ch by thisreferenceisincorporatedinthisagreement,shall be made at the eadiest practical date.The Agency shall,upon presentation of final billing promptly reimburse the Railwayforthecostofservicesandexpensesofworkncludedinthisagreement.Preliminary engineering costs incurredsubsequent to September 17,1991,may be charged againstthisproject. pawaagency rLo/poo assuea + 3 dSeaa/Sa uo;ue ;o Z;T0 00£LOEPGCt xea P0,9I g¢900¢/1/€0X¥3I LLL 500//0 I I I I i I I I I I I I I I I I I I IX All contracts between the Agency and its contractor,for either the constructionhereinprovidedforormaintenanceworkonthehghwaywithinanyeasementareadescribedhereinorshownontheexhibitsattachedhereto,shall require the contractortoprotectandho!d harmless the Railway and any other railroad company occupying orusingtheRailwaysright-of-way or line of ra road against all loss,liability and damagearisingfromactivitiesofthecontractor,its forces or any of ts subcontractors or agents. Such Indemnity provision sha#l be in accordance with RN 4.24.115 as amended byoh.305,Laws of 1986.The contract shall further provide that the contractorshall: F"-1.Furnish to the Railwaya Railroad Protective Pol cy ntheformprovidedbynPM6-6-2-2.The comb ned single limit of said policy shall not be less than Two Million Dollars ($2,000,000)for all damages arising out of bodily injuries toor death of anypersonorpersonsandforalldamagesarisingoutofthelossordestructionoforinjuryordamagetopropertyinanyoneoccurrencedudngthepocyperiod,and subject tothatlimitatotal(or aggregate)limit of not less than Six MiJlion Dollars ($6,OOO,OO0)foralldamagesduringthepolicyperodSaidnsurancepolicyexecutedbyacorporationqualified-to write the same in the state in which the work is to be performed,shall be intheformandsubstancesatisfactorytotheRailwaycompanyandshallbedeliveredtoandapprovedbytheRailwaypriortotheentryuponoruseofitspropertybythecontractor, 2.CarryregularContractor'sPub cUabilityand Property Damage nsuraneeasspecifiedinFHPM-6-2-2 providing for a limit of not less than One Million Dollars($1,000.000)for an damages adsing outof bod y njur esto ordeath ofone person,and,subject to that limit for each person,a totaliimit of not less than Two M ionDollars($2,000,000)for all damages a rising out of bod y njur es to or death of two ormorepersonsinanyoneaccident;and providing for a hmit of not less than One MillionDollars($1,000,000)for all damages to ordestruct on of property in any on e ace dentandsubjecttothatlimitatotal(or aggregate)limit of not tess than Two Million Dollars($2,000.000)for all damages to ordestruct on of property during the policy period.AcertificateofinsuranceprovidingproofofContractorsPub€Liability and PropertyDamageInsurancecontainsathirty(30)-day advance written notice to the Railway intheeventofcancellationnonrenewaormaterialchangeofpocy,executed by acorporationqualifiedtowritethesameinthestateinwhichtheworkistobeperformed,in form and substance satisfactory to the Railway shall be delivered to andapprovedbytheRailwaypriortotheentryuponoruseoftheRailwayspropertybythecontractor.The Railway shall not be a named insured in the above policy. if the Agency,its contractor,subcontractors or agents,in the performance of theworkhereinprovidedfororbythefailuretodoorperformanythingforwhichitis responsible under the provisions hereof,shah damage or destroy any property of theRailway,such damage or destruction shall be corrected bythe Agency in the event itscontractorortheinsurancecarriersfailtorepairorrestorethesame. For anywork performed in the State of Washington,nothing in this agreement isintendedtobeconstruedasarec]u rement for an indemnification against the solenegligenceoftheRailwayitsofficers,amp oyees or agents.Moreover,for any workperformedinthestateofWashington,the contractor shall specifically and expressly agree to indemnify the Railway and any otherra.,...road corn.ny occupying or using"theRadwaysright-of-wayor ne of radroad against all loss,haihty and damages, including environmental damage,hazardous materials damage,or penalties or finesthatmaybeassessed,caused by or resulting from the concurrent neli ence of a theRailwayor,the Railway's officers,employees or agents,and (b)the cogngactor o(t)hecontractorsemployees,agents or subcontractors. The contractor shal further ag tee that it has a duty to defend at its own expense,in the name and on behalf of the Railway,all claims or suits for injuries or death of persons or damage to property arising or g rowing out of the work carried on under thisagreement,for which the Ra way s able or is alleged to be liable.However,upon afinaldeterminationinacourtoflawinwhichapercentageofnegligenceisattnbutedtotheRailway,the Railway agrees to re mburse the contractor in the same percentageforthecostsinvolvedindefendingthesuit. X Upon completion of the project,the Agency,at its sole cost and expense,shallmaintainallimprovements,other appurtenances,advance warning signs,and standardpavementmarkingswiththeexceptionofthecrossingwhichwbemaintainedbytheRailwayandAgencyunderthefollowingterms. pawaagency 4 Loloo asas/ga uoueu ;o XO 00£L0;z xv 09 ant 900¢/t/¢0 XYSI L:LL 900/t/O I I I I I i I I I I I I I I I I I I I Highway traffic control whenever necessary for Ra way maintenancework on theroadwaycrossingshallinallcasesbeperformedbytheAgencyatitssolecostandexpense, The Railway agrees to bearthe cost of maintaining the roadway crossing pursuant to RCW 81.53.090only until such time as the statue is repealed or interpreted as to relieve the Railwayofthe obligation to bearany ex])ense of maintenance work on thecrossing. When the Railway is no longer obligated to bear any expense for the maintenance,the Agencywill reimburse the Railwayfor 100 percent of the annual maintenance costforbothcrossings,including the cost of removal and reinstallation for periodic track maintenance work aswell as renewals as required,amounting to $15 per track foot for eacn crolnl/osta!l .ed under thrs agreement.The crossings in this proposed installation amounc to o,¢s track reel per crossing (96 track feet)at $15 per foot -- $1 440 annual,maintenance cost based u,on 1992 costs.Adjustments tothe annual maintenance cnarge will be made annually commencing July 1,1993,and will be baseduponthepercentageofchangentheAssociationofAmericanRailroadsCostRecoveryIndexSeriesRCR(1977--100),Table A for the Western District Material Prices,Wage Rates and Supplements Combined (excluding fuel)or successor index mutually ag reeduponbytheparties,from the year 1992 wh €shall be used as a base year for the calenderyear immediately prior to the year in which the change is to be made effective. The above provision is separate and d st nct from the other provisions contained herein and should it or the calculation used to allocate the maintenance cost be found unlawful or otherwise invalid the remaining provisions of the agreement which are supported by independent consideration,shall not be invalidated,but remain effectiveandinfullforce. XI Upon completion of the installation of said 5ignals,the Railway at its sole cost and expense shall operate and maintain sa d 5 gna s,provided however that the Railway shall be entitled to receive reimbursementor any or all of the cost of such maintenanceasmaybemadeavailablebyreasonofanylaw,order,regulation or otherwiseprovidingforthereimbursementofsaidcosts, XII Either party hereto may assign any receivables due them under this agreement provided however such assignments shall not relieve the assignor of any of its rights orobigationsunderthisagreement. XIII In the event the Signals installed under this agreement.are partially or wholly destroyed and the cost of repair or replacement cannotbe recovered from the person orpersonsresponsibleforsuchdestructon,then,in that event the cost of repair orreplacementshallbebornebytheAgency, in the event the Signals,or a portion of the Signals installed under this agreement cannot through age.be maintained,or by virtue of their obsolescence require replacement,ten in either event,the cost of installation of new Signals shall be bornebytheAgency XIV In the event that either highway or Railway changes will necessitate revisions of the Signals by rearrangement,replacement,or addit ons at the said location,the partywhosechangescausesaidrevsonswillbeartheentirecostofthesamewithoutobligationtotheother. XV In case said road shall at any t me cease to be used as a public road,or shall by operation of law become vacated or abandoned,the rights and benefits to the Agency under this agreement shall immediately cease,and the Railway shall be entitledto repossess the land to which it has executed agreements and permits to the Agency andtousethesamethereafterasifthisagreementhadneverbeenexecutedwithoutthe necessity of any further legal proceed ngs. pawaagency 5 ,LO/SO0 ;a.sueJ$÷ ×¥IL;LL 800Z/IL/O \ \ I I I i \ \ L I I I I I I I I I I I I i I I I I PLACE -48"Rubber crossing REPLACE -120TF of 1 lS#rail with 120TF of 115# CWR. REHABILITATE.With new tJe,fastenings,ballast and engineering fabric. INSTALL-(forvehiculartraffic)One automatic flashing light traffic control device,shoulder mount type,wi gateand train activation type devices. (for pedestrian traffid'lo automatic flashing light traffic control devices,shoulder mount type,with bell. UPGRADE-Train activation devices atthe Lake Washington Blvd.grade crossing located at MP 3.97. LO/600 Je;SueJ + WORK BY BN RAILROAD BOEING CROSSING (MP 3.90) PLACE -48'Rubber crossing REPLACE-120TFof 115#rail with 120TFof 115#CWR, REHABILITATE.With new tie,faening$,balla>and engineering fabric. INSTALL-One automatic flashlng•lighttraffic control device,shoulder mounttype,with gate •,and train activation typedevices. :_____."'?','',",.q/:.,::.:::::::::::!/.!...,'.':-::;:,.-,.,::;; EXHIBIT "A-I' B.N.RAILROAD COMPANY PACIFIC DIVISION -WOODINVILLE SUBDIVSION CONSTRUCTION OF THE BOEING ACCESS ROAD GRADE CROSSINGS (MP 3.90 AND 3.93) RENTON,WA.SCALE:1"=40' MANAGER ENGINEERING*SEATTLE,WA,8-22-91 REV.10-10-91 esea/ga uou®e ;o -€TaOO;tOE;Z xa to,it nz 900z/l/oXVIt:LL 00/PL/Z0 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I EXHIBIT "B" STATEMENT OF CONDITIONS WHEN FLAGMEN,PROTECTIVE SERVICESANDDEVICESWlU.BE FURNISHED BY THE RAILWAY Railwayflagmen,protective services,and devices will be furnished but not limitedtheretoforthefollowingconditions: (1)WhenintheopinionoftheRailwayprotecton sneeessa to fRaw'""ry sa eguardtheaystrans,engines,fatalities,and property. (2)When anywork is performed over,under or in close proximity to tracks or anyRailwayfacilities. (3)When work in any way interferes with the operation of trains at usual speeds orthreatens,damages or endangers track or Railway facilities. (4)When any hazard is presented ¢o Railwaycommunications signal,electrical,or otherfacilities either due to parson,materia,equipment,or 5lasting in thevicinity. (S)Whore or when material is being hauled across tracks.Special €earanca must beobtainedfromtheRailwaybeforemovingheavyorcumbersomeobjectsandequipmentwhichmightresultinmakingthetrackimpassable. COST OF FLAGGING AND OTHER PROTECTIVE SERVICES AND DEVICE (a)(b)(c)(cINUMBERCLASSIFICATIONBASEPAYHADQUARTERS 3 Sectionmen $13.S0/hour/Seattle,WA. 8-hour day plusadditives. NOTES: (a)A full flagging crewgenerally consists of three men.Under certa n cond tionsmorethanthreemenmayberequiredoraessernumbermaybesufficient.However,additional personnel,such as communications linemen and/orsignalmenmaybeusedtoprotectcommunicationsandsignalfacilities,if deemednecessarybytheRailway. (b)The Classification is shown solelyfor the prospective bidder's information,and there is noguarantee that the above classes of labor will actua y be used orthattheratesofpayshowninColumn(c)will be those in effect at the time the work isundertaken, (€)Shows base pay rate per man per hour for normal eight.hour shift in effectFebruary1993. (d)Estimated costs for travel per employee from headquarters to job site and return is$19.00 per round trip.The estimated daily cost for mea s and otheraccommodationsis$---per amp oyee, (e)In addition protective day ces,such as crossing signals,indicators,telltales,tights.telephone,etc.,may be required.In this connection tellta es may be installed bytheRailwayatitsoption,as a cond tion of ts approval of any proposedrestrctionsofverticaclearancaduringconstructiontolessthan22-1/2 feet. (f)It shall be the duty and responsibility ofthe and its Contractors to notify the Railway's Division Superintendent at leastom-'-:'rty-eight (48)hours in advance ofwhenTlagmenorotherprotectiveservicesanddevicesarerequired. To all direct labor costs there shall be additional charges for Vacation Allowance,HealthandWelfare.Railroad Retirement and Unemp oyment Taxes;Pub ic Liabil'P,.ity,roDamageandWorkmensCompensationInsuranceandaccountnqandbillinoForr rtyeszlmat.mgurposes o.nly,these additives collectively may be considered as -'-=pproxlmacmg a_2 OT alrect labor costs. pawaagency 7 P0/010 dgMa/ga uo,JeH ;o ZT0 00L0£PSP ]oa 90=I 8N¢900/P110""0/0[0 JasueJT ,-X¥I §L:LI 900/L/0 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I PACIFIC DIVISION STATE OF WASHINGTON BURUNGTON NORTHERN RAILROAD COMPANY WOODINVILLE SUBDIVISION RENTON,WASHINGTON VALUATION SECTION WA 4A-P Estimated cost for the construction of the Boeing Access Road grade crossings located atMP4.90 and MP 4.93 as per Exhibit "A-1 =. ESTIMATED (QST PART I-Not Estimated PART II 1.Track and ossin W r ,Crossing at MP-3.llace 48 rubber crossing.Replace 120TF of 115#rail with 12gTF of 115# CWR.Rehabilitate crossing area with newt es,fastenings,ballast,and engineering fabric. Crossing at MP 3,93 -Place 48'rubber crossing.Replace 120TF of 115#rail with 120TF of 1156 CWR.Rehabilitate crossing area with new t esfastenings,ballast,and engineer ng fabric.$7,680 $33,380MaterialHandling2,522 Freight 1,659EquipmentRental2,304Salvage(1,424) M.__$7,680 $3B,441SubtotalWithoutLaborSurcharges 2. g at MP 3.90 -Install 1 automat cflashinglighttrafficcontroldevice,shouldermounttypewithagateandtrainactivationdevices. Crossing at MP 3.93 -Install 3 automaticflashinglighttrafficcontroldevices,shouldermounttypewith1gateandtrainactivationdevices. uCrpgosSing (Lake Washington Blvd.)at MP 3.97 -fade train activation devices. $19,604 $80,326MaterialHandling6,104EquipmentRental4,704Freight4,016BusinessExpense5.881 --4--Subtotal Without Labor Surcharges $19,6G4 $101,031" 3.Flagaina,Protective Services and Devic Not estimated-See Exhibit "B" pawaagency 8 4.Enclineerina and Preparatign of Billy Preliminary and Special EngineeringConstructionEngineeringPreparationofBills Subtotal Without Labor Surcharges 1.Track and Crossing Work2.Signal Work 3.Flagging,Protective Services and Devices4.Engineering and Bill Preparat on5.Liability Insurance Totals 6.Labor Surcharges Vacation Pay.Paid Holidays,Railroad Retirement,Unemployment Insurance,Health and Welfare Benefits Contingencies State of Washington Tax Total B/Cvs.Renton,Washington $1,6872,140818 $4,645 $7,680 19,604 4,645 $31,929 S m m $38,441 101,031 5,401 $144,873 7$TF¢ $2.653 Office of Manager EngineeringSeattle,Washington pawaagency I0/¢I0 sSaa/go uotuoE ;o ;TO OOELOEV;Z xa LOI a 00€/;/€0tO/O JSUeJ •XWI SL:LL 900/PL/O i I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I EXHIBIT "D" Appendix A Nondiscrimination Provisions of Title VI of the Civil RightsAct of 1964. During the performance of this contract,the contraor,for itself,its assignees and successorsininterest(hereinafterreferredtoasthe Contractor ),agreesasfollows: (1)Compliance with Relulations:The Contractorwill comply with the Regulations ofthe Department of Transportation relative to nondis- crimination in fedesally-assistedprograms of the Department ofTransportation(Title 49,Code of Federal Regulations,Part 21,hereinafter referred to as the "Regulations'),which are hereinincorporatedbyreferenceandmadeapartofthiscontract. *(2)Nondisc;rimination:The Contractor,with regard to the work pertormed by it after award and pr orto complet on of the contract work,will not discriminate on the ground of race,color or nationaloriginintheselectionandretentionofsubcontractors,including procurements of materia s and eases of equ pment The Contractorwillnotparticipateeitherdirectlyorindirectlyinthediscrimination prohibited by Section 21.5 of the Regu ations,including employment practices when the contract covers a program set forth inAppendixes"A","B"and "C". (3)Solicitations fqr Subcontracts,Includinq Procurements of Materia s Ad:In all solicitations either by competitive bidding or "' negotiation made by the contractor for work to be performed under a subcontract,including procurements of materials or equipment,eachpotentialsubcontractororsuppliershallbenotifedbytheContractor ofthe Contractor s obligations under this contract and the Regulations re!atire to nondiscrimination on the ground of race,color or nationalorigin. (4)information and Reports:The Contractor will provide all information and reports required by the Reculations or orders and instructions issued pursuant thereto,and will permit access to its books,records, accounts,other sources of informat on,and ts facilities as maybe determined by the State Highway Department or the Federal Highway Administration to be pertinent to ascertain compliance with such Regulations,orders,and instructions.Where any information required of a Contractor is in the exclusive possess on of another who fails or refusesto furnish this information,the Contractor shall so cercif to the State Highway Department or the Federal Highway Administratren as appropriate and shall set forth what efforts it has made to obtain theintormation, (5)SanctiQ for NoncompliancP:in the event of the Contractor's noncomplJance with the nondiscrimination provisions ofthis contract, the State Highway Department shall impose such contract sanctions as it orthe Federal Highway Administration maydeterm ne to be appro-priate,including,but not I mited to; (a)withholding of paymentstothe Contractor under the contractuntiltheContractorcomplies,and/or (b)cancellation,termination,orsuspension of the contract,in wholeorInpart. (6)I.ncorporation of Provisions:The Contractor will include the provisionsotparagraphs(1)through (6)in every subcontract,including procurements of materials and leases of egu pment,unless exempt by the Regulations,order or instructions issued pursuant thereto.The Contractor will take such action with respect to any subcontract or procurement as the State Highway Department or the Federal Highway Administration may direct as a means of enforcing such prov s ons n-eluding sanctions for noncompliance:Provided,however,that,in the event a Contractor becomes involved in or isthreatened with litigation with a subcontractor or supplier as a result of such direction,the Contractor may request the State to enter into such litigation to protect pawaegency 10 VI0/ET0 dSgoa/So uouea ;o Z;0 00£LOE;¢rxva L0=8 900€/vI/€010/L0]Jasue ,-X¥:1I L:LL 900/PL/0 GO 0 Jx JI°cC J >< Z_J CcE J W 0 JIzcCi Z I J< J .-.\ ii!i ii t1235SE6thSt. Suite220 Bellevue,WA98004 T (425)453-9501 F (425)453,-8208 V,'ww,PACLD,CO SCALE=1"=100' LOWE'S OF RENTON RENTON,WASHINGTON DRIVEWAY ACCESS LOCATIONS 05-17-2006 EXHIBIT A I 11 i I it' I' I I I' P GIOF_NGINIEIS; I I i I i I I i I I I I I I i, I I I TABLE OF CONTENTS e No. 1 .O INTRODUCTION .....................................................................................................................................1 2.0 SCOPE OF SERVICES ...........................................................................................................................1 3.0 SITE CONDITIONS .................................................................................................................................1 3.1 SITE GEOLOGY............................................................................................................................1 3.2 SURFACE CONDITIONS ..............................................................................................................1 3.3 SUBSURFACE SOIL CONDITIONS .............................................................................................2 3.3.1 General .............................................................................................................................2 3.3.2 Fill......................................................................................................................................2 3.3.3 Upper Alluvial Deposits .....................................................................................................2 3.3.4 Lower Alluvial Deposits .....................................................................................................3 3.4 GROUNDWATER CONDITIONS ..................................................................................................3 4.0 CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS .......................................................................................3 4.1 GENERAL......................................................................................................................................3 4.2 EARTHQUAKE DESIGN ...............................................................................................................4 4.2.1 Regional Seismicity...........................................................................................................4 4.2.2 Liquefaction Potential........................................................................................................5 4.2.3 Lateral Spreading..............................................................................................................5 4.2.4 2003 IBC Seismic Design Information ..............................................................................6 4.3 CONSOLIDATION SETTLEMENT................................................................................................6 4.4 FOUNDATION DESIGN RECOMMENDATIONS .........................................................................7 4.4.1 General .............................................................................................................................7 4.4.2 Deep Foundations.............................................................................................................8 4.4.2.1 General ................................................................................................................8 4.4.2.2 Vertical Capacity ..................................................................................................8 4.4.2.3 Lateral Capacity ...................................................................................................9 4.4.2.4 Pile Settlement ...................................................................................................10 4.4.2.5 Augercast Pile Installation ..................................................................................10 4.4.2.6 Driven Pile Installation .......................................................................................11 4.4.3 Shallow Foundations with Ground Improvement 11 4.5 FLOOR SLABS ............................................................................................................................12 4.6 HARDSCAPES AND UTILITIES .................................................................................................13 4.7 RETAINING WALLS ...................................................................................................................13 4.8 EARTHWORK AND STRUCTURAL FILL ..................................................................................14 4.8.1 Excavation Considerations ............................................................................................14 4.8.2 Subgrade Preparation ....................................................................................................14 4.8.3 Erosion and Sedimentation Control ................................................................................15 4.8.4 Structural Fill ...................................................................................................................15 4.8.4.1 Materials .............................................................................................................15 4.8.4.2 Use of On-site Soils ...........................................................................................16 4.8.4.3 Fill Placement and Compaction Criteria.............................................................16 4.8.5 Weather Considerations .................................................................................................17 4.8.6 Temporary Excavation Support ......................................................................................17 File No 8335 003-00 Page i GEOENGINEERS Jf Jammry 26,2006 I ,| i TABLE OF CONTENTS (CONTINUED) P 4.9 PAVEMENT DESIGN RECOMMENDATIONS ...........................................................................18 4.9.1 General ...........................................................................................................................18 4.9.2 Subgrade Preparation .....................................................................................................18 4.9.3 Asphalt Pavements ................................................:........................................................18 4.9.4 Portland Cement Concrete (PCC)Pavements ................................................................18 4.10 DRAINAGE CONSIDERATIONS .............................................................................................19 4.11 OTHER DESIGN CONSIDERATIONS .....................................................................................19 4.11.1 Frost Penetration .........................................................................................................19 4.11.2 Corrosivity ....................................................................................................................19 5.0 RECOMMENDED ADDITIONAL SERVICES ......................................................................................20 6.0 LIMITATIONS .......................................................................................................................................20 7.0 REFERENCES ......................................................................................................................................20 List of Figures Figure 1.Vicinity Map Figure 2.Site Plan Figure 3.Subsurface Profile A-A' Figure 4.Subsurface Profile B-B' Figure 5.Contour Map,Top Elevation of Lower Alluvial Deposits APPENDICES APPENDIX A -FIELD EXPLORATIONS Appendix A Figures Figure A-1 -Key to Exploration Logs Figures A-2...A-8 -Log of Borings Figures A-9...A-13 -Log of CPT Probes APPENDIX B -LABORATORY TESTING Appendix B Figures Figure B-1 -Sieve Analysis Results Figure 8-2...B-3 -Atterberg Limits Test Results Figures B-4...B-5-Compaction Test Results APPENDIX C -REPORT LIMITATIONS AND GUIDELINES FOR USE FileNo.8335-O03-O0 Page ii GEOENGINEER Januao,26.2006 ! ! ! ! | I I ! ! ! ! 1 ! ! ! ! GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING SERVICES LOWE'S OF RENTON SITE RENTON,WASHINGTON FOR LOWE'S HIW INC. 1.0 INTRODUCTION This report presents the results of our geotechnical engineering services for the planned Lowe's of Rcnton site in Renton,Washington.The project site is located at the southeast comer of the intersection of Garden Avenue North and Northeast Park Drive.The site is shown relative to surrounding physical features on the Vicinity Map,Figure I and the Site Plan,Figure 2. We understand that the current development plans consist of construction of a 128,277 square-foot sales warehouse building and a 29,712 square-foot garden center (157,989 square feet total).Load information for the structures has not been finalized;however,column loads for this structure type are typically 100 kips,wall loads arc typically 6 kips per foot and floor slab loads are typically 300 psf (pounds per square foot).The warehouse building will be located in the northern portion of the site.The garden center will be directly south of the warehouse building along the east perimeter of the site.Track delivery and staging areas will be located on the north side of the warehouse building.The southern portion of the site will be developed with at-grade parking.Minor grading will be completed as the site is currently developed as a relatively level asphalt paved parking lot. 2.0 SCOPE OF SERVICES The purpose of our services is to evaluate the subsurface soil and groundwater conditions as a basis for providing geotechnical recommendations and design criteria for the project.Our specific scope of services Ibr this project is presented in our proposal dated December 7,2005. 3.0 SITE CONDITIONS 3.1 SITE GEOLOGY Published geologic information for the project vicinity includes a U.S.Geological Survey Map titled "Geologic Map of Surficia]Deposits in the Seattle 30'x 60'Quadrangle,Washington"(Yount et.ah, 1993).The surficial soils in the vicinity of the site arc mapped as modified land over alluvial deposits. The modified land consists of land changes by man for construction or development purposes,generally by fill methods,rEae fill is highly variable and consists of random mixtures of sand,mud,gravel and foreign debris.The alluvial deposits generally consist of interbedded layers of soil ranging from clay to sand and gravel.These soils were left by the meandering of the Cedar River and are poorly to moderately consolidated.Organic rich soils such as peat are also present in the alluvial deposits,being deposited in marshy areas near the meandering river. 3.2 SURFACE CONDITIONS The project site is located in at thc southeast comer of the intersection of Garden Avenue North and Northeast Park Drive,approximately ¼mile south of Lake Washington in Renton,Washington.The project site is approximately 10-acres and is bounded by Garden Avenue North and a residential development under construction to the west,Northeast Park Drive and a power substation to the north,a Fry's Electronics Superstore and associated asphalt parking to the south,and the BNSF railroad lines to the east. File No.8335-003 O0 Page 1 GEOENGINEER January 26.2006 I I ! I i I i I l I I i I I ! I I I The site currently consists of an asphalt-surfaced parking lot with several light poles scattered throughout the property.The asphalt pavement in the northern end of the site (the planned location of the warehouse building)appears to have been placed within the last 5 years and is generally in thir condition.The pavement in the southern end of the site (the planned location of parking)appears much older and contains numerous areas of distress and cracking.The cracking has been cold-sealed;however,grasses and other weeds were observed growing through the repaired cracks. The ground surface at the site varies from about Elevation 36 feet at the southeast comer to about Elevation 29 feet at the northwest corner.The overall grade of the site is generally less than 2 percent. 3.3 SUBSURFACE SOIL CONDITIONS 3.3.1 General We explored subsurface soil conditions at the site by drilling seven borings (B-1 through B-7)to depths of 16½to 80 feet and by advancing five cone penetration test probes (CPT-1 through CPT-5)to depths of 41½to 80 feet.We also reviewed explorations completed for the Fry's Electronics Superstorc to the south and the residential development to the west.The approximate locations of the explorations completed for this study are shown on the Site Plan,Figure 2.A description of the field exploration and logs of the borings and probes are presented in Appendix A.A description of the laboratory testing procedures and results of the laboratory tests are presented in Appendix B. The soils encountered in our explorations are consistent with the mapped geologic units and consist of fill,upper alluvial deposits,and lower alluvial deposits.The units are described in more detail below. Subsurface profiles across the site are showing in Figures 3 and 4. 3.3.2 Fill Asphalt pavement was encountered in each of the borings completed at the site.The pavement section generally consists of 1½to 4½inches of asphalt concrete.The existing pavement is thickest in the northern end of the site where the pavement was observed to be in fair condition.The distressed pavement in the south end of the site is less than 2 inches thick.Approximately 1 inch of crushed rock base course was present below the asphalt pavement in borings B-6 and B-7 (south end of site).Base course was not present in the remaining borings. Granular fill was encountered below the asphalt pavement in each of the explorations.The fill generally consists of medium dense to very dense silty sand with gravel and was encountered to depths ranging from 5 to 13 feet below the ground surface.The fill thickness is variable with no consistent thickness pattern across the site. 3.3.3 Upper Alluvial Deposits The upper alluvial deposits were encountered below the fill in the borings and the cone penetration test probes.The upper alluvial deposits consist ofinterbedded layers of sand,silt,clay and peat and organic silt.This deposit extends to depths ranging from 46 to 62 feet below the ground surface.The sand layers contain variable amounts of silt and are the most prevalent unit within the deposit.The sand layers are loose to medium dense,making them susceptible to liquefaction.The peat and organic silt layers vary from 1 to 10 feet in thickness,are highly compressible,and are generally thickest at the top of the deposit. Thin layers of peat and organic silt are present throughout this deposit.The silt and clay layers are soft to medium stiff,moderately compressible,and are generally present near the bottom of this deposit. FileNo 8335 003_00 Page 2 GEOENGINEER January 26,2006 tl I i i 11 I I i I I I i CPT-4 met refusal within thc upper alluvial deposits at a depth of about 41 feet.A second probe (CPT-5) was completed approximately 10 feet from CPT-4,and the probe was advanced into the lower alluvial deposits.The first probe attempt likely encountered wood debris within a peat layer,based on soil sampling from nearby boring B-2. 3.3.4 Lower Alluvial Deposits The lower alluvial deposits generally consist of medium dense to very dense sand and gravel with varying amounts of silt.The lower alluvial deposits are considered to be a suitable bearing layer for support of building loads,discussed in more detail in Section 4.4 of this report.The top of the lower alluvial deposits was encountered at depths ranging from 46 to 62 feet below the ground surface (Elevation -15 feet to Elevation -31 feet).Our interpretation of the top of this deposit is shown in Figure 5. 3.4 GROUNDWATER CONDITIONS Groundwater was measured in monitoring wells at depths ranging from 6 to 8V2 feet below the ground surface.Table 1 summarizes the depth to groundwater and the groundwater elevation at each of the monitoring wells installed at the site.The Elevation data is based on topographic information provided on the Site Plan,Figure 2. Table 1.Summary of Groundwater Conditions Approximate :"Approximate Boring (general Ground Surface .Groundwater site location)Elevation (ft)_'E evation (ft) 23.5B-4 (north) B-5 (middle) B-7 (south) 32 33 33 Groundwater Measured Depth to Measurement Date Groundwater (ft) 01/03/06 8.5 01/17/06 01/03/06 01/17/06 01/03/06 01/17/06 7.8 7.5 7.6 7.5 6.3 24.2 25.5 25.4 25.5 26.7 Based on the groundwater information,the groundwater surface slopes down from the south to the northwest across the site.Groundwater conditions should be expected to fluctuate as a function of season, precipitation,the rise and fall of Lake Washington,and other factors. 4.0 CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS 4.1 GENERAL Based on the results of our subsurface explorations and our geotechnical engineering evaluations,it is our opinion that the planned Lowe's of Renton site may be developed successfully as planned.The key issues related to site development include: •The sand layers within the upper alluvial deposits are susceptible to seismically induced liquefaction to an approximate depth of 50 fizet below the ground surface.Liquefaction is characterized by the loss of soil strength during seismic shaking that result in ground settlement. We estimate that ground settlement in the range of 2 to 12 inches could occur during a design earthquake. Fde No.8335-003-00 Page 3 GEOENGINEER January 26,2006 I I I I I I I I I I I i I I I I I I •There is also a risk of liquefaction-induced lateral spreading at the site (lateral flow of soil towards Lake Washington to the north).We estimate that lateral spreading will be up to 2 inches at the warehouse building location. •The peat and organic silt layers within the upper alluvial deposits are susceptible to consolidation settlement under the anticipated building and floor loads.Based on our analyses,we estimate that primary consolidation settlement will be on the order of 2 to 4 inches for floor slab loads of 300 psf and 3 to 4 inches for wall loads of 6 kips per foot.Secondary consolidation settlement, on the order of 1 to 3 inches,should also be expected over a period of 30 to 50 years. •We recommend that the planned building and floor slabs be supported on augercast piles or driven steel pipe piles that extend through the liquefiable/compressible upper alluvial deposits and bear on the lower alluvial deposits. •As an alternate to augercast piles,the planned building and floor slabs may be supported on shallow foundations founded on improved ground (stone columns or rammed aggregate piers). The improved ground will reduce the risk of liquefaction-induced settlement,lateral spreading, and consolidation settlement.Ground improvement is typically designed by a specialty contractor. •In our opinion,augercast piles will be the most cost effective foundation support for the project. Specific recommendations for design and construction of the Lowe's of Renton project are presented in subsequent sections ofthis report.The following areas are addressed: •Earthquake Design •Consolidation Settlement •Foundation Design Recommendations •Floor Slabs •Retaining Walls •Earthwork and Structural Fill •Pavement Design Recommendations •Drainage Considerations •Other Design Considerations 4.2 EARTHQUAKE DESIGN 4.2.1 Regional Seismicity The Puget Sound region is located at the convergent continental boundary known as the Cascadia Subduction Zone (CSZ).The CSZ is the zone where the westward advancing North American plate is overriding the subducting Juan de Fuca plate.The CSZ extends from mid-Vancouver Island to Northern California.The interaction of these two plates rcsults in three potential seismic source zoncs:a shallow crustal source zone,the Benioff source zone,and the CSZ interplate source zone. The shallow crustal source zone is used to characterize shallow crustal earthquake activity within the North American Plate at depths ranging from 3 to 19 miles below the ground surface.The Seattle Fault Zone located about 7 miles north of the site and the Tacoma Fault located about 10 miles to the south are considered shallow crustal source zones.The most recent major earthquake from this zone (on the Seattle Fault Zone)is estimated to have occurred about 1,100 years ago. The Benioff source zone is used to characterize intraplate,intraslab,or deep subcmstal earthquakes. Benioff zone earthquakes occur within the subducting Juan de Fuca Plate at depths between 20 to 40 File No.8335-003-00 Page 4 GEOENGINEER January 26,2006 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I miles.In recent years,three large Benioff source zone earthquakes occurred which resulted in some liquel:action in loose alluvial deposits and significant damage to some structures.The first earthquake, which was centered in the Olympia area,occurred in 1949 with a Richter magnitude of 7.1.The second earthquake occurred in 1965,was centered between Seattle and Tacoma,and had a Richter magnitude of 6.5.The third earthquake occurred in 2001,was located in the Nisqually valley north of Olympia,and had a Richter magnitude of 6.8. The CSZ interplate source zone is used to characterize rupture of the convergent boundary between the subducting Juan de Fuca plate and the overriding North American plate.The depth of CSZ earthquakes is greater than 40 miles.No earthquakes on the CSZ have been instrumentally recorded;however,through geologic record and historical records of tsunamis in Japan,it is believed the most recent CSZ event occurred in 1700. 4.2.2 Liquefaction Potential Liquefaction is a phenomenon where soils experience a rapid loss of internal strength as a consequence of strong ground shaking.Ground settlement,lateral spreading and/or sand boils may result from liquefaction.Structures supported on liquefied soils could suffer foundation settlement or lateral movement that could be severely damaging to the structures. Conditions favorable to liquefaction occur in loose to medium dense,clean to moderately silty sand (granular soil)that is below the groundwater level.Dense soils or soil that exhibit cohesion (fine-grained soil)are less likely to be susceptible to liquefaction. The evaluation of liquefaction potential is complex and is dependent on numerous site parameters, including soil grain size,soil density,site geometry,static stresses,and the magnitude and ground acceleration of the design earthquake.Typically,the liquefaction potential of a site is evaluated by comparing the cyclic shear stress ratio (the ratio of the cyclic shear stress to the initial effective overburden stress)induced by an earthquake to the cyclic shear stress ratio required to cause liquefaction. The cyclic shear stress ratio required to cause liquefaction was estimated using an empirical procedure based on the in-situ static ground stresses,the blow count data obtained during sampling in the borings, the penetration resistance during pushing of the CPT probes,and a design earthquake with a Richter magnitude of 7.0 and a peak horizontal ground acceleration of 0.35g.The desigm earthquake parameters were developed using published hazard maps and deaggregation analysis for the above seismic source zones (USGS,2002)and the code requirements in the International Building Code (IBC,2003). Based on our evaluation of the subsurface conditions at the site and our analysis,we conclude that the loose to medium dense granular upper alluvial deposits present between depths of about 8 to 50 feet below the existing ground surface have a moderate to high potential for liquefaction.Our analyses indicate that the liquefaction-induced settlement in these granular soils will on the order of about 2 to 12 inches.Due to the random nature of liquefaction,differential settlements over short distances could equal the total liquefaction-induced settlement estimates.The potential for and risk of liquefaction- induced settlement has been considered in development of the foundation recommendations in Section 4.4 of this report. 4.2.3 Lateral Spreading Lateral spreading involves lateral displacements of large volumes of liquefied soil during an earthquake. Lateral spreading can occur on near-level ground as blocks of surface soils displace relative to adjacent blocks.Lateral spreading also occurs as blocks of surface soils are displaced toward a nearby slope (free File No.8335-003 O0 Page 5 GEOENGINEER$Jt ,hlntmO,26.2006 i I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I face)by movement of the underlying liquefied soil.Lake Washington,located approximately 1600 feet north of the site,represents a free face condition. The evaluation of lateral spreading at the site was completed using an empirical model that incorporates earthquake,geological,topographical and soil factors that affect ground displacement.The model was developed from compiled data collected at sites where lateral spreading was observed.The key parameters arc the Richter magnitude,the horizontal ground acceleration,the thickness of the liquefied zone,the grain size distribution of the liquefied deposit,and the location of the free face to the planned structure.The results of our analyses indicate that lateral spreading will be up to 2 inches at the warehouse building location.The potential for and risk of lateral spreading has been considered in development of the foundation recommendations in Section 4.4 of this report. 4.2.4 2003 IBC Seismic Design Information We understand that the building type planned for the project will have a period of vibration of less than 0.5 seconds.Even though potentially liquefiable soils are present at the site,the 2003 International Building Code (IBC)allows the use of non-liquefiable soil parameters for seismic design of buildings with a period of vibration less than 0.5 seconds.In accordance with the 1Be criteria,we recommend the parameters for Site Class,short period spectral response acceleration (Ss),1-second period spectral response acceleration (Si),and Seismic Coefficients FA and Fv presented in the following tables.Table 2 provides IBC seismic parameters for pile foundation supported structures. Table 2.IBC Seismic Parameters -Pile Foundations 2003 IBCParameter Site Class Short Period Spectral Response Acceleration,Ss (percent g) 1-Second Period Spectral Response Acceleration,S,(percent g) Seismic Coefficient,FA ;Seismic Coefficient,Fv Recommended Value E 145 49 0.9 2.4 If ground improvement is completed at the site to mitigate the potential for liquefaction as discussed in Section 4.4,the seismic response of the ground will be improved.Table 3 below provided 1Be seismic parameters for the site if ground improvement (stone columns or rammed aggregate piers)is completed. Table 3.IBC Seismic Parameters -Shallow Foundations on Improved Ground 2003 IBC Parameter Recommended Value Site Class D 1-Second Period Spectral Response Acceleration.S (percent g)49 Seismic Coefficient,FA 1.0 Seismic Coefficient,gv 1.5 4.3 CONSOLIDATION SETTLEMENT Several layers of highly compressible peat and organic silt and moderately compressible silt and clay were observed in our explorations completed at the site.We have completed several analyses to evainate the consolidation settlement of these compressible soils under the t]oor slab loads of 300 psf and the wall FileNo.8335-003 O0 Page 6 GEOENGINEER Jammry 26 2006 i I l I I I I I I I I I I I I i I I loads of 6 kips pcr toot.Based on the results of our analyses,we estimate that approximately 2 to 4 inches of primary consolidation settlement may occur as a result of the floor slab loads.We estimate that approximately 3 to 4 inches of primary consolidation settlement will occur as a result of the 6 kips per foot wall load (I,500 psf looting load with a footing width of 4 feet).Primary settlement is expected to occur over a period of 3 to 6 months. Secondary settlement of the peat and organic silt will also occur after the loads are applied and primary settlement is essentially complete.This settlement is in addition to the primary settlement discussed above.We estimate that the secondary consolidation settlement will range from 1 to 3 inches over a period of about 30 to 50 years. 4.4 FOUNDATION DESIGN RECOMMENDATIONS 4.4.1 General Based on the presence of the highly compressible peat and organic silt layers and the presence of the potentially liquefiable soils,it is our opinion that shallow foundation support,unless uscd in conjunction with ground improvement,is not feasible at this site. We have identified two foundation support options (dcep foundations or shallow foundations on improved ground)for structures at the site.The foundation options were selected to address safe entry and exit from the buildings following an earthquake event.Each of the options presents different levels of risk for the structure which should be considered as part of the design process.The foundation support options,listed generally from lowest to highest cost are provided below.Specific design and construction recommendations for each of these options are prcsented in the following sections of this report. 1.Deep foundations,consisting of either augercast or driven steel piles,which extend below the potentially liquefiable and lateral spreading susceptible soils and below the compressible deposits.The piles will derive their capacity largely from friction and end bearing within the lower alluvial deposits.The pile foundations will reduce the vertical settlement of foundation elements to about V2 inch.However,this option will not reduce the risk of overall lateral spreading at the site unless the piles are designed to resist the loads resulting from lateral spreading.The design of piles for lateral spreading is not considered a life safety issue but rather a performance issue;and as such,is not a requirement of the 2003 IBC. 2.Shallow foundations with ground improvement.Stone column or rammed aggregate pier construction involves the partial replacement of soft,unsuitable soils and densifieation of potentially liquefiable soils with a vertical column of compacted stone.The compacted columns of stone allow transfer of building loads to soils at depth,similar to pile foundations.A 2-foot- thickness of compacted crushed rock will need to be included in the design to transfer the building loads to the improved ground.Total settlement is expected to be about 1 inch and differential settlement is expected to be less than about ½inch for this foundation system.When properly designed and constructed,it is possible to limit overall lateral spread displacements to about ½to 1 inch. In our opinion,augercast piles will be the most appropriate foundation support system for thc project. The depth to the lower alluvial deposits is variable across the building site.Variable length augercast piles can be installed with little waste of materials;whereas welding and splicing of driven steel piles may be required if variable driving conditions are encountered.Augercast piles will,however,generate soil cuttings that may not bc desirable if contaminants are present.Ground improvement is t)asible,although it may be problematic due to the presence of organic soils at the site.Our experience at sites with similar File No,8335-003-00 Page 7 GEOENGINEER JanuaO,26,2006 i I g I I I I I I I I I I I I soil conditions has indicated that ground improvement is generally more expensive than augercast or driven piles. 4.4.2 Deep Foundations 4.4.2.1 General We have considered several deep foundation options for supporting the proposed structures,including augercast piles and driven steel piles.Augercast piles are generally much more cost-effective than driven steel piles.However,the augercast piles will generate soil cuttings that may not be desirable if contaminants are present.Driven piles may bc appropriate tbr the site;however,ground vibrations from driven piles could damage nearby structures,particularly the 72 inch storm drain pipe along Garden Avenue North.Additionally,corrosion protection will likely be necessary for steel piling,based on pH testing described in Section 4.11.2.We recommend that these issues be evaluated as part of the pile foundation selection process.In our opinion,augercast piles are the most appropriate foundation support option for the project. 4.4.2.2 Vertical Capacity The proposed building can be satisfactorily supported on augercast piles or driven steel piles that extend below the upper alluvial deposits (potentially liquefiable and compressible soils)to at least 10 feet into the underlying lower alluvial deposits.The piles will derive their capacity largely from friction and end bearing within the lower alluvial deposits.Our estimate of the Elevation of the top of the lower alluvial deposits is provided on Figure 5. Our exploration program was developed concurrently with site layout design.At the time our exploration program was completed,the garden center was planned directly south of the warehouse along the west perimeter of the site (opposite of current plan).The Elevation contour in the garden center area (Figure 5) is based on interpolation of explorations completed for the Fry's Electronic Superstorc and should be considered approximate.Appropriate field observation should be completed to verify that adequate pile embedment depths are achieved in this area. We have evaluated the vertical capacity for 14-inch-diameter augercast piles,18-inch-diameter augercast piles,and 14-inch-diameter driven steel pipe piles.The results in summarized in Table 4. Table 4.Allowable Downward and Uplift Pile Capacities Pile Type and Diameter 14-inch augercast 18-inch augercast 14-inch steel pipe Minimum Pile Tip Embedment into Lower Alluvial Deposits (feet) 10 15 10 15 10 Allowable Pile Capacity (kips) Downward UpliN 60 80 90 115 65 lOO 40 35 50 45 15 120 55 I I I These allowable pile capacities above apply to long-term live and dead loads and may bc increased by one-third for short-term live loads such as wind or seismic forces.The recommended penetrations also take into account the potential downdrag loads associated with consolidation settlement and liquefaction settlement during the design earthquake. The allowable pile capacities are based on the strength of the supporting soils for the penetrations indicated and include a fhctor of safety of"at least 2 for side resistance and end bearing.The capacities File No 8335 003 O0 Page 8 GEOENGINEER January 26.2006 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I apply to single piles.If piles within groups are spaced at least 3-pile diameters apart on center,no reduction for pile group action need be made.The structural characteristics of the pile materials and structural limitations may impose more stringent limitations and should be evaluated by the structural engineer.If the augercast piles are designed to resist uplift loads,we recommend that a single reinforcing bar be centcred in the pile and installed the entire length of the augercast pile to develop uplift capacity. It should be noted that the recommended pile penetrations and allowable capacities presented above are based on assumed subsurface soil conditions at the site.There may be unexpected variations in the depth to,and characteristics of,the lower alluvial deposits across the site.Accordingly,we recommend that pile installation be monitored by a member of our staff to observe installation procedures and evaluate the adequacy of individual pile installations. 4.4.2.3 Lateral Capacity Resistance to lateral loads can be developed by passive pressure on the face ofpile caps and by the lateral capacity of the piles.Passive pressure on the face of below-grade elements can be computed on the basis of an equivalent fluid density of 300 pcf (pounds pcr cubic foot).This fluid density assumes that existing medium dense or denser fill or newly compacted structural fill is used around these elements for a horizontal distance equal to at least two times the depth of the element.This value includes a Ihctor of safety of 1.5.Base friction on below-grade elements should be ignored since these will be pile-supported and full contact with the underlying soil cannot be assured. The lateral load capacity of the piles depends on thc pile head deflection,pile stiffness,surrounding soil properties,the degree of fixity at the pile cap,and the decision to design the piles for lateral spreading.In our opinion,the design of the piles for lateral spreading is not considered a life safety risk but a performance decision to be made by the owner and the design team.The estimated lateral spread movement of up to 2 inches will result in an increased bending moments in the pile,as well as a decreased lateral pile capacity.If the piles are not designed for this increased bending moment,the piles may crack or become damaged.The vertical capacity of the piles may also be reduced.If the piles are not designed for lateral spreading,it is our opinion that safe entry and exit from the building can occur after a design seismic event,but the building may not be safe from a business operation standpoint and some retrofitting and repair may be required. Our recommended lateral pile capacities for various pile head deflections are presented in Tables 5 and 6. We recommend that the piles be designed for fixed-headed conditions at the pile cap to provide added stiflhess and resistance to lateral loads.Table 5 presents our lateral pile recommendations for piles not designed for lateral spreading.Table 6 presents our recommendations for piles that are designed for the effects of lateral spreading (piles have moved laterally 2 inches prior to providing lateral resistance). Table 5.Allowable Lateral Pile Capacities and Bending Moments -No Lateral Spreading Included I I I Allowable Lateral Pile Maximum Rending Pile Type and Diameter Pile Head Deflection (in)Capacity (kips)Moment (foot-kips) 1/2 15 55 14-inch augercast ..................................................1 19 80 1/2 20 85 18-inch augercast 1 26 130 14-inch steel pipe 1/2 18 80 ('/inch wall thickness)1 24 120 I File No.8335-003-00 Page 9 GEOENGINEER Jtmutu3'26.2006 ! !Table 6.Allowable Lateral Pile Capacities and Bending Moments -Lateral Spreading Included I I I Allowable Lateral Pile Maximum Bending Pile Type and Diameter Pile Head Deflection (in)Capacity (kips)Moment (foot-kips) 1/2 1.5 13014-inch augercast 18-inch augercast 144nch steel pipe(Tz-inch wall thickness) 1/2 1 1/2 2.5 150 230 270 210 240 I I i I i I i I I I I I I The above lateral capacities assume a center-to-center spacing of at least 3-pile diameters.The maximum bending moment will occur at the pile cap because the piles are designed for fixed-headed conditions. For augercast piles,we recommend that reinforcing extend from the top of the piles to a minimum depth of 30 feet (14-inch-diameter)or 36 feet (18-inch-diamater)below the top of the piles for piles not designed for lateral spreading.If the effects of lateral spreading are included in the design,we recommend that the reinforcing extend to a mininmm depth of 36 feet (14-inch-diameter)or 42 feet (18-inch-diameter). 4.4.2.4 Pile Settlement Pile settlements are expected to be essentially elastic in nature and occur as loads are applied.We estimate that the post-construction settlement of augercast or driven piles,designed in accordance with these recommendations,should be less than about '/2 inch.Maximum differential settlement should be less '/4 inch. 4.4.2.5 Augercast Pile Installation Augercast concrete piles should be installed to the recommended penetration using a continuous-flight, hollow-stem auger.As is common practice,the pile grout is pumped under pressure through the hollow stem as the auger is withdrawn.Reinforcing steel for bending and uplift is placed in the fresh grout column immediately after withdrawal of the auger.An advantage of the augercast pile installation method is that it causes relatively little vibration and variable length piles can easily be installed. We recommend that the augercast piles be installed by a contractor experienced in their placement and using suitable equipment.Grout pumps should be fitted with a volume-measuring device and pressure gauge so that the volume of grout placed in each pile and the pressure head can be easily determined. While grouting,the rate of auger withdrawal should be uniform and controlled such that the volume of grout pumped is equivalent to at least 115 percent of the theoretical hole volume.This will be a critical step for pile installation at the site because of the presence of peat and organic silt.A minimum grout line pressure of 100 psi and a minimum grout head of 10 feet (depth of auger in ground when grout return is observed)should be maintained.We recommend that there be a waiting period of at least eight hours between installation of piles spaced closer than 10 feet center-to-center in order to avoid disturbance of concrete undergoing curing in a previously cast pile. There may be unexpected variations in the depth to and characteristics of the supporting soils across the site.In addition,no direct information regarding the capacity of augercast piles (e.g.,driving resistance data)is obtained while this type of pile is being installed.Accordingly,we strongly recommend that we be retained to monitor drilling operations,record indicated penetrations into supporting soils,monitor grout injection pressures,record the volume of grout placed in each pile relative to the calculated volume of the hole,and evaluate the adequacy of each pile installation. File No.8335 003-00 Page 10 GEOENGINEEII Janutu3,26.2006 I I I I I I l I I I I I I I I l I I 4.4.2.6 Driven Pile Installation We recommend that the piles bc installed with a pile-driving hammer having a minimum rated energy of at least 35,000 foot-pounds per blow.To develop the indicated downward capacity,the piles should be driven to the penetration recommended or to the appropriate driving resistance.We should be notified if pile refusal occurs at less than the recommended penetrations so that we can consider potential reduction in the uplift capacity. Driving criteria (blow counts)are dependent on the driving hammer characteristics,capacity required, group action and other factors.When the hammer has been selected,we can analyze these characteristics to evaluate appropriate driving criteria.The recommended vertical capacities for the piles should be verified using pile driving criteria based on a minimum number of blows for the last 3 inches of driving. Driving to blow counts in excess of the recommended driving criteria should not be permitted so that the piles are not overstressed. We recommend that the pile installation be monitored by a member of our staff who would observe installation procedures,maintain driving records,and evaluate the adequacy of each pile. The proximity of nearby existing buildings and the 72-inch storm drain pipe along Garden Avenue North may pose a concern as a result of perceived vibration damage during pile installation.The level of ground vibrations induced by pile driving depends primarily on the hammer energy,pile type and size, soil type,and distance from the pile.In particular,pile driving can cause felt and measurable vibrations for up to several hundred feet from the pile.Minor architectural or cosmetic damage (i.e.,small cracks)at moderate distances and structural damage at close distances to pile driving operations can occur. We recommend that a detailed preconstrnction condition damage survey of nearby structures be completed to document structural and cosmetic building conditions.We also recommend that the inside of the 72-inch storm drain pipe be videoed to documents existing conditions.We also recommend that ground vibrations be closely monitored at the beginning of pile installation.The inlbrmation obtained from this program could be used to modify the pile installation program should the level of vibration become too high.Vibration monitoring can be accomplished by means of a portable oscillograph designed to measure velocity (or displacement and acceleration)in three orthogonal directions as a function of time.The stations for the oscillograph should be positioned at various distances from the pile driving opcrations in the direction of buildings and the storm drain pipe.Measurement of vibrations on these structures and the pipe would also be useful.We recommend that the average peak particle velocity during pile driving measured at the structures or the pipe be limited to 0.5 inches per second.The maximum instantaneous peak particle velocity during pile driving should be less than 1 inch per second. 4.4.3 Shallow Foundations with Ground Improvement Ground improvement construction (stone columns or rammed aggregate piers)involves the partial replacement of soft,unsuitable soils and densification of potentially liquefiable soils with a vertical column of compacted stone.The compacted columns of stone allow transfer of building loads to soils at depth,similar to pile foundations.A 2-foot-thickness of compacted crushed rock will need to be included in the design to transfer the building loads to the improved ground.The crushed rock should meet the gradation requirements in Section 4.8.4.1. The design of the ground improvement should be accomplished by a qualified contractor experienced with this type of work.The desigu should be reviewed by GeoEngineers prior to mobilization.In this section we present some geotechnical design requirements that the contractor needs to incorporate into his design package,if this option is selected for foundation support. File A'o 8335 003-00 Page 11 GEOENGINEER$, January 26 2006 I I I I I I l I I I I i l l I I I I We recommend that all stone colmrms extend down through the potentially liquefiable soils.We therefore recommend that all stone columns he installed to a standard depth of at least 50 feet below the existing ground surfiace. The ground improvement stone columns should be at least 30 inches in diameter.At least two stone columns are required for each interior building column footing.Single stone columns may be feasible for perimeter building wall footings provided they are spaced no further than 8 to 10 feet on center.Below slab areas,the typical column spacing will likely be 8 to 9 feet on center to mitigate liquefiable soils and consolidation settlement.The specific number,size and strength of the stone columns will be the responsibility of the contractor,subject to review by GeoEngineers.For the portion of the column beneath the groundwater table (6 to 8 feet below the ground surface)the stone aggregate should consist of crushed gravel that contains no particles finer than the #40 sieve.Above the groundwater table,the percent of particles finer than the #40 sieve may be increased at the ground improvement contractor's discretion,subject to the approval of GeoEngineers. Assuming the stone columns have been properly designed and installed and the surface of the stone columns are competent and not disturbed during installation of the 2-foot-thick crushed rock layer,it is our opinion that the following design parameters are feasible for shallow foundations supported on the improved ground: •Allowable soil bearing pressure of 3,000 to 4,000 psf.Allowable soil bearing value may be increased by 1/3 when considering wind or seismic loading conditions. •Floor slab loads of 300 psf. •Total settlement of less than 1 inch.Differential settlement of less than '/2 inch. The ground improvement center-to-center spacing and diameter should be such that the corrected Standard Penetration Test (SPT)blow counts (N()cs)are increased to a minimum of 23 in the upper 50 feet of soil with appropriate corrections for silt content.Before production ground improvement work is initiated,the contractor should complete a test section to demonstrate that the submitted installation equipment and methods will meet the performance requirements presented above.Pertbrmance testing of the test section should be completed using CPT testing or SPT testing completed in accordance with ASTM D1586 using automatic trip,safety hammers or cathead hammers.Wireline-operated hammers will not be allowed.Perlbrmance testing should be completed both prior to and after ground improvement in the immediate vicinity of the test section to confirm that the submitted design meets the performance requirements.The performance test should be completed at the location equidistant from adjacent stone columns.Performance testing during production should be completed at a frequency of one CPT or SPT test per 10,000 square feet of ground improvement.Pertbrmance testing should also include a modulus load test to verify that the allowable soil bearing pressure can be achieved with the design.GcoEngineers should be retained to provide observation and interpretation during the performance testing. 4.5 FLOOR SLABS Floor slab support will be dependant of the type of foundation support li?r the building.If the building is supported on pile foundations,we recommend that the floor slabs also be supported on piles due to the anticipated total and differential settlement under static and seismic loading.Since the slab will be pile- supported,the slab subgrade will only need to he prepared to facilitate construction and no special requirements for soft soil removal and/or compaction below the slab are required. File No.8335-003-00 Pttg8 12 GEOENGINEER Janutly 26.2006 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I If the building is supported on improved ground,the floor slab may be supported at grade provided that the improved ground (column size and spacing as discussed in Section 4.4.3 is designed to limit total and differential settlements to 1 inch and '/2 inch,respectively.The 2 foot layer of crushed rock placed on top of the improved ground will provide adequate subgrade support and a modulus of subgrade reaction of 100 pci (pounds per cubic inch)can be used for slabs supported on this layer. We recommend that the floor slabs (either pile supported or supported on improved ground)be underlain by a 4-inch-thick layer of capillary break material to reduce the potential for moisture migration into the slab.The 2-foot-thickness of crushed rock placed for ground improvement will provide adequate capillary break provided that it does not become contaminated with fines during construction.Material specifications for capillary break and/or crushed rock material are provided in Section 4.8.4.1 of this report.A commercial vapor barrier (6-mil minimum thickness)should be placed below the slab in areas where moisture control is critical,such as where adhesives are used to anchor carpet or tile to the slab. 4.6 HARDSCAPES AND UTILITIES Concrete hardscape areas,such as entry slabs and sidewalks,and utilities on the outside of the smacture may experience long-term settlement after a design seismic event or as the organic soils decompose and compress.If finished grades vary by more than about 1 to 2 feet,long-term settlement due to consolidation settlement may also occur. Sidewalks along the building should be detached so that one side does not hang up and cause a sidewalk to tilt.Entries should be designed as a ramp with one end supported on the building and the other end supported on the ground to avoid the development of abrupt changes in grade.Sidewalks and entry slabs should be underlain by a 4-inch-thick layer of crashed surfacing base course,described in Section 4.8.4.1. Utility lines that tie into the building (either pile supported or supported on shallow foundations with improved ground)should have flexible connections and be designed to accommodate differential settlement without damage. 4.7 RETAINING WALLS We recommend that walls for loading docks or other building walls that serve as retaining walls be designed for lateral pressures based on an equivalent fluid density of 35 pcf (pounds per cubic lbot) (triangular distribution).This assumes that the walls will not be restrained against rotation whcn backfill is placed,if the walls arc restrained against rotation,we recommend using an equivalent fluid density of 50 pcf.The above-recommended lateral soil pressures do not include the effects of surcharges such as floor loads,traffic loads or othcr surface loading.A lateral force coefficient of 0.28 should be used for accounting for surcharge effects.The lateral pressure (rectangular distribution)experienced by the wall due to surcharge loading is calculated by multiplying the lateral force coefficient and the surcharge load. Seismic earth pressures should also be used as a check in the design.For horizontal conditions behind the wall,we recommend that a seismic earth pressure distribution equal to 7H psf (pounds per square foot) (rectangular distribution)be added to the static lateral earth pressures,where 11 is the height of the wall. In settlcmcnt sensitive areas behind walls (e.g.,beneath on-grade slabs),the upper 2 feet of fill behind the walls should be compacted to at least 95 percent of the maximum dry density (MDD)determined in accordance with ASTM D-1557.At other locations and below a depth of 2 feet,wall backfill should be compacted to between 90 and 92 pcrcent of the MDD.Measures should be taken to prevent ovcrcompaction of the backfill behind the wall. File No.8335-003 O0 Page 13 GEOENG)NEERS Januat3,26.2006 I I I I I I I i I I I l l I I I I I The recommended equivalent fluid density assumes a free-draining condition behind the wall.This may be accomplished by placing an 18-inch-wide zone of "Gravel Backfll for Walls"(WSDOT Standard Specification 9-03.12(2))behind the wall.Weep holes at about 4-foot centers at the base of the wall should be sufficient to drain water from exterior walls.Alternatively,a perforated drain pipe could be installed at the base of the wall and be tightlined to the storm drainage system,as discussed below under Section 4.10. The foundation support recommendations provided in Section 4.4 of this report are also appropriate for design of retaining walls. 4.8 EARTHWORK AND STRUCTURAL FILL 4.8.1 Excavation Considerations The near surface soils encountered in the excavations consist of fill and upper alluvial deposits.We anticipate that these soils can be excavated with conventional excavation equipment,such as backhoes, trackhoes and dozers. 4.8.2 Subgrade Preparation The existing asphalt should be left in-place during construction,where feasible,to protect subgrade soils from disturbance and to aid in control of erosion and sedimentation in unexcavated areas ofthe site.The pavement will provide adequate support for construction equipment but may become damaged during construction. In building areas,we recommend that the existing asphalt be ground up and mixed in with the underlying fill or be broken up and removed from the site.Removal or grinding of the asphalt will allow for easier installation ofpile foundations or ground improvement. In new pavement and hardscape areas,the existing pavement may be broken into pieces less than 6 inches or ground up and mixed in with the underlying fill to provide an adequate subgrade condition for new pavements.Alternatively,the asphalt should be removed from the site.The existing pavement in these areas is generally less than 2 inches in thickncss and shows moderate distress and deterioration.We recommend that the upper 12 inches of subgrade soils below new pavements be compacted to at least 95 percent of the maximum dry density (MDD)in accordance with ASTM D-1557.In hardscape areas, the upper 12 inches of subgrade soils should bc compacted to at least 92 percent of the MDD.If the subgrade soils are loose or soft,it may be necessary to excavate the soils and replace them with structural fill. The fill soils below the existing pavement contain a significant amount of fines (silt)and are very moisture sensitive.Operation of equipment on these exposed soils will be difficult under wet conditions. Disturbance of shallow subgrade soils should be expected if subgrade preparation work is done during period of wet weather. The exposed subgrade in new pavement and structure areas should be evaluated after site grading is complete.Proof-rolling with heavy,rubber-tired construction equipment should be used for this purpose during dry weather and if access for this equipment is practical.Probing should be used to evaluate the subgrade during periods of wet weather or if access is not feasible for construction equipment.Soft areas noted during proof-rolling or probing should be excavated and replaced with compacted structural fill. File No 8335-003-00 Page 14 GEOENGINEER JanuaO,26,2006 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I 4.8.3 Erosion and Sedimentation Control Potential sources or causes of erosion and sedimentation depend upon construction methods,slope length and gradient,amount of soil exposed and/or disturbed,soil type,construction sequencing and weather. Implementing an erosion and sedimentation control plan will reduce the project impact on erosion-prone areas.The plan should be designed in accordance with applicable city,county and/or state standards. The plan should incorporate basic planning principles including: •Scheduling grading and construction to reduce soil exposure. •Retaining existing asphalt for as long as practical or whenever feasible. •Revegetating or mulching denuded areas. •Directing runoff'away from denuded areas. •Reducing the length and steepness ofslopes with exposed soils. •Decreasing runoff velocities. •Preparing drainage ways and outlets to handle concentrated or increased runoff. •Confining sediment to the project site. •Inspecting and maintaining control measures frequently. In addition,we recommend that sloped surfaces in exposed or disturbed soil be restored so that surface runoff does not become channeled.Some sloughing and raveling of slopes with exposed or disturbed soil should be expected. Temporary erosion protection should be used and maintained in areas with exposed or disturbed soils to help reduce erosion and reduce transport of sediment to adjacent areas and receiving waters.Permanent erosion protection should be provided by paving or landscape planting. Until the permanent erosion protection is established and the site is stabilized,site monitoring should be performed by qualified personnel to evaluate the effectiveness of the erosion control measures and to repair and/or modify them as appropriate.Provisions for modifications to the erosion control system based on monitoring observations should be included in the erosion and sedimentation control plan. 4.8.4 Structural Fill 4.8.4.1 Materials Materials placed to support structures,placed behind retaining structures,and placed below pavements and sidewalks are classified as structural fill for the purpose of this report.Structural fill material quality varies depending upon its use as described below: 1.As a minimum,structural fill placed to backfill utility trenches or placed below structures, pavements and sidewalks should meet the requirements of "Common Borrow,"WSDOT Standard Specification 9-03.14(3).If structural fill is placed during wet weather,the structural fill should consist of "Gravel Borrow,"WSDOT Standard Specification 9-03.14(1),with the additional restriction that the fines content be limited to no more than 5 percent fines. 2.Structural fill placed as capillary break material below slabs or as the 2-foot-thick crushed rock layer above the ground improvement and below the slab should consist of 1V>inch minus, free-draining crushed gravel with negligible sand or silt in conlbrmation with Section 9-03.1(4)C, grading no.57 of the WSDOT Standard Specifications.Alternatively,this material shonld meet the requirements of Type 21 (1-1/2"crushed gravel),City of Seattle Standard Specification 9-03.16 with the exccption that this material should have negligible sand or fines. Fae No.8335-003 O0 Page 15 GEOENGINEEItS Jcmuao,26.2006 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I 3.Structural 1511 placed immediately behind retaining wails or below-grade walls should meet the requirements "Gravel Backfill for Walls,"WSDOT Standard Specification 9-03.12(2). 4.Structural fill placed within 6 inches of foundation and wall drains should meet the requirements of "Gravel Backfill for Drains,"WSDOT Standard Specification %03.12(4). S.Structural fill placed as "Crushed Surfacing"base course below pavements and hardscape (entry slabs and sidewalks)should meet the requirements of WSDOT Standard Specification 9-03.9(3). 6.Recycled materials (such as broken or ground up asphalt)may be used as structural fill below buildings,pavements,and in utility trenches provided it is broken up into pieces smaller than 6 inches in diameter.In building areas,this material may be placed below the structure provided that it is not used as the 2-1hot-thick crushed rock pad immediately below the slab.In parking and drive areas,recycled materials may be placed directly below the new pavement section (asphalt or concrete pavement and base course). 4.8.4.2 Use of On-site Soils The fill and upper alluvial deposits contain a high percentage of fines (silt and clay)and are very moisture sensitive.The upper alluvial deposits also contain a significant amount of organic matter.In our opinion, the upper alluvial deposits should not be considered for reuse as structural fill.The existing fill present at the site may be reused provided it is adequately moisture conditioned during placement. 4.8.4.3 Fill Placement and Compaction Criteria Structural fill should be mechanically compacted to a firm,non-yielding condition.Structural fill should be placed in loose lifts not exceeding 8 to 10 inches in thickness.Each lift should be conditioned to the proper moisture content and compacted to the specified density before placing subsequent lifts.Structural fill should be compacted to the following criteria,which is consistent with Lowe's HIW Inc.minimum requirements: 1.Structural fill placed within a distance of one-half the wall height measured from the back of the wall should be compacted to 90 to 92 percent of the maximum dry density (MDD)estimated in accordance with ASTM D-1557.Care should be taken when compacting fill near the face of below grade walls to avoid over-compaction and hence overstressing the walls.Structural fill placed beyond the zone immediately behind the walls should be compacted to at least 95 percent ofthe MDD if located in building or pavement areas or to at least 92 percent of the MDD in other areas. 2.Structural fill in new pavement areas,including utility trench backfill,should be compacted to 92 percent of the MDD estimated in accordance with ASTM D-1557,except that the upper 2 feet of fill below final subgrade should be compacted to at least 95 percent of the MDD. 3.Structural fill placed below floor slabs,footings or structures should be compacted to 95 percent of the MDD estimated in accordance with ASTM D-1557. 4.Structural fill placed as crushed rock base course below pavements should be compacted to 95 percent of the MDD estimated in accordance with ASTM D-1557. 5.Structural fill placed below hardscape (entry slabs and sidewalks)should be compacted to at least 92 percent of the MDD estimated in accordance with ASTM D-1557 6.Non-structural fill,such as fill placed in landscape areas,should be compacted to at least 90 percent of the MDD estimated in accordance with ASTM D-1557.In areas intended for future development,a higher degree of compaction should be considered to reduce the settlement potential of the fill soils. Fde No.8335 003-00 Page 16 GEOENGINEER January 26,2006 I I I I I I I I I I I I I i I I I I We recommend that a representative from our firm be present during proofrolling and/or probing of the exposed subgrade and pavement subgrade soils,and placement of structural fill.Our representative will evaluate the adequacy of the subgradc soils and identify areas needing further work,perform in-place moisture-density tests in the fill to evaluate if the work is being done in accordance with the compaction specifications,and advise on any modifications to procedure,which may be appropriate for the prevailing conditions. 4.8.5 Weather Considerations The on-site soils at the site contain a high percentage of fines (silt)and are moisture sensitive.When the moisture content of these soils is more than a few percent above the optimum moisture content,they become muddy and unstable.Operation of equipment in these conditions will be difficult.Additionally, disturbance of near surface soils should be expected if earthwork is completed during periods of wet weather.During dry weather the soils will be less susceptible to disturbance and provide better support for construction equipment. The wet weather season generally begins in October and continues through May in western Washington; however,periods of wet weather may occur during any month of the year.If wet weather earthwork is unavoidable,we recommend that the following steps be taken should the near surface soil conditions begin to deteriorate: •The ground surface in and around the work area should be sloped so that surface water is directed away from the work area.The ground surface should be graded so that areas ofponded water do not develop.Measures should be taken by the contractor to prevent surface water from collecting in excavations and trenches.Measures should be implemented to remove surface water from the work area. •Earthwork activities should not take place during periods of heavy precipitation. •Slopes with exposed soils should be covered with plastic sheeting or similar means. •The site soils should not bc left uncompacted and exposed to moisture.Sealing the surficial soils by rolling with a smooth-drum roller prior to periods of precipitation will help reduce the extent that these soils become wet or unstable. •Construction traffic should be restricted to specific areas of the site,preferably areas that are surfaced with existing asphalt that is not susceptible to wet weather disturbance. •Construction activities should be scheduled so that the length of time that soils are left exposed to moisture is reduced to the extent practical. 4.8.8 Temporary Excavation Support All temporary cut slopes and excavation support must comply with the provisions of Title 296 WAC (Washington Administrative Code),Part N,"Excavation,Trenching,and Shoring."The contractor performing the work has the primary responsibility for protection of workmen and adjacent improvements and selection of appropriate excavation support methods.We expect that either temporary open cuts or trench boxes will be used for support of shallow excavations at the site. In our opinion,excavations for utility trenches and foundations arc highly susceptible to caving and sloughing.The soils encountered at the site are classified as Type C soil.We recommend that the temporary unsupported cuts be inclined no steeper than IV2H:IV.Flatter slopes may be necessary if seepage is present on the cut face.For open cuts at the site,we recommend that: •No traffic,construction equipment,stockpiles or building supplies be allowed at the top of the cut slopes within a distance of at least 5 feet from the top of the cut. File No.8335 003 O0 Page ]7 GEOENGINEEIIS January 26,2000 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I l •Exposed soil along the slope be protected from surface erosion using waterproof tarps or visqueen if the slope will be open for an extended period of time. •Construction activities be scheduled so that the length of time the temporary cut is left open is reduced to the extent practical. •Erosion control measures be implemented as appropriate such that runoff from the site is reduced to the extent practical. •Surface water is diverted away from the excavation. •The general condition of the slopes be observed periodically by GeoEngineers to confirm adequate stability. 4.9 PAVEMENT DESIGN RECOMMENDATIONS 4.9.1 General The following design criteria were used in developing design pavement sections for this project: •15 year dcsigm life •Traffic equal to 25 loaded tractor trailers per day and 2,500 cars per day •California Bearing Ratio (CBR)of 15 for subgrade soils prepared as described in Section 4.9.2 of this report.The CBR value was determined from laboratory tests completed for this study and arc presented in Appendix B. 4.9.2 Subgrade Preparation We recommend that the subgrade soils in new pavement areas be prepared and evaluated as described in Section 4.8.2 of this report.We recommend that upper 12 inches of subgrade soils in pavement areas be compacted to at least 95 percent ofthe MDD in accordance with ASTM D-1557.If the subgrade soils are loose or soft,it may be necessary to excavate the soils and replace them with structural fill or additional crushed rock base material.Pavement subgrade conditions should be observed and proofrolled during construction to evaluate the presence of unsuitable subgrade soils and the need for overexcavation. 4.9.3 Asphalt Pavements We recommend that standard duty asphalt pavement sections consist of 1 inch of asphalt surface course,2 inches of asphalt binder course,and 6 inches of crushed rock base course.For design of heavy duty pavement sections,we recommend using 1 inch of asphalt surface course,2 inches of asphalt binder course and 8 inches of crushed rock base course.The asphalt surface course and binder course should consist of HMA (Hot Mix Asphalt)with a performance grade PG 58-22,as specified in Section 9-02 of the WSDOT Standard Specifications.Placement and compaction of the HMA should be in general accordance with Sections 5-04,9-02 and applicable section of 9-03 of the WSDOT Standard Specifications.The crushed rock base course should conform to Section 9-03.9(3)of the WSDOT Standard Specifications and should be compacted to at least 95 percent of the MDD. 4.9.4 Portland Cement Concrete (PCC)Pavements We recommend that standard duty PCC pavement sections consist of 5 inches of 4,000 psi Portland cement concrete over 4 inches of crushed rock base course.For design of heavy duty pavement sections, wc recommend using 6 inches of 4,000 psi Portland cement concrete over 4 inches of crushed rock base File No 8335-003-00 Page 18 GEOENGINEERS January 26,2006 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I course.Installation of the Portland cement concrete pavement should be in general accordance with Sections 5-05,9-01 and applicable sections of 9-03 of the WSDOT Standard Specifications.The crushed rock base course should contbm to Section 9-03.9(3)of the WSDOT Standard Specifications and should be compacted to at least 95 percent of the MDD.The purpose of the crushed rock base course is to provide uniform support and act as a drainage layer below the pavement. 4.10 DRAINAGE CONSIDERATIONS The static groundwater level was measured in the explorations at depths of about 6 to 8½feet below the ground surface.Significant excavations at the site are not expected to extend below this depth.Perched groundwater may be encountered above this depth if work takes place during or immediately following extended wet weather.We anticipate that the perched water can be handled during construction by ditching and sump pumping,as necessary.In our experience,limited excavations in similar soils that extend less than 2 to 4 feet below the static groundwater level can also be controlled using sumps and pumps.All collected water should be routed to suitable discharge points. We recommend that retaining wall footings be constracted with drains if weep holes are not installed at the base of the walls.The drains should consist of perforated pipe a minimum of 4 inches in diameter enveloped within a minimum thickness of 6 inches of "Gravel Backfill for Drains,"WSDOT Standard Specification 9-03.12(4).A nonwoven geotextile fabric such as Mirafi 140N should be placed between the drain rock and on-site soils to prevent movement of fines into the drainage material. We recommend that finish surfaces adjacent to the building be sloped so that surface drainage flows away from the building or adequate collection occurs before the surface water reaches the building.All roof drains and retaining wall drains,if any,should be connected to tightlines that discharge into the storm sewer disposal system.Roof drains should be kept separate for retaining wall drains. 4.11 OTHER DESIGN CONSIDERATIONS 4.11.1 Frost Penetration The near-surface soils are moderately susceptible to frost.The depth of frost penetration is this region is typically about 8 inches.The locally accepted design embedment for exterior foundations (shallow foundations or pile caps)is 18 inches and interior foundations is 12 inches;therefore,the embedments should provide adequate frost protection.Frost susceptibility for soils beneath slabs in heatcd buildings is expected to be low.Frost susceptibility in pavement areas is also expected to be low if they are constructed and supported as recommended. 4.11.2 Corrosivity We completed thirteen pH tests on soil samples obtained from the borings as an indicator of corrosion potential.The test results are presented in Appendix B of this report.The test results on the near surface soils (upper 5 feet)indicate a pH range of 6.8 to 8.3.Based on the test results,we conclude that there is a low risk of corrosion from the near-surface soils at this site.The test results on selected samples of the upper alluvial deposits indicate a pH range of 4.6 to 6.0.The organic silt and peat in the upper alluvial deposits have a moderate to high corrosion potential because a protective coating of rust generally cannot form on steel in environments with pH levels of about 5.0 or lower. File No 8335-003-00 Page 19 GEOENGINEER January 26,2006 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I 5.0 RECOMMENDED ADDITIONAL SERVICES Throughout this report,recommendations are provided where we consider additional geotechnical engineering services to be appropriate.Thcse additional services are summarized below: •GeoEngineers should be retained to review the project plans and specifications when complete to confirm that our design recommendations have been implemented as intended. •During construction,GeoEngineers should observe the installation of deep foundations,observe installation of ground improvement and performance testing,evaluate the suitability of the shallow foundation subgrades,evaluate pavement subgrade,observe installation of subsurface drainage measures,evaluate the compaction of structural fill,evaluate the condition of temporary erosion control measures,and provide a letter summarizing our construction observation services. The purposes of GeoEngineers construction phase services are to confirm that the subsurface conditions are consistent with those observed in the explorations and for other reasons described in Appendix C,Report Limitations and Guidelines for Use. 6.0 LIMITATIONS We have prepared this report for the exclusive use by Lowe's HIW Inc.,PacLand and other members of their design team for the Lowc's of Renton site in Renton,Washington.The data and report should be provided to prospective contractors for their bidding or estimating purposes,but our report,conclusions and interpretations should not be construed as a warranty of the subsurface conditions. Within the limitations of scope,schedule and budget,our services have been executed in accordance with generally accepted practices in the fields of geotechnical engineering and hydrogeology in this area at the time this report was prepared.No warranty or other conditions,express or implied,should be understood. Any electronic form,facsimile or hard copy of the original document (email,text,table,and/or figure),if provided,and any attachments are only a copy of the original document.The original document is stored by GcoEnginecrs,Inc.and will serve as the official document of record. Please refer to Appendix C,titled "Report Limitations and Guidelines for Use,"for additional infbmaation pertaining to use of this report. 7.0 REFERENCES City of Seattle,2000,"Standard Specifications for Road,Bridge and Municipal Construction." International Code Council,2003,"International Building Code." United States Geological Survey,"Earthquake Hazards Program,Interpolated Probabilistic Ground Motion for the Conterminous 48 States by Latitude and Longitude,2002 data. WAC (Washington Administrative Code),Title 296,Part N,"Excavation,Trenching and Shoring." Washington State Department of Transportation,2006,"Standard Specifications for Road,Bridge and Municipal Construction." Yount,et.Ah,1993,"Geologic Map of Surficial Deposits in the Seattle 30'x 60'Quadrangle, Washington." File No 8335-003-00 Page 20 GEOENGINEER January 26.2006 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I < X LJZ Dg]OKE 4SlIINGTON (PiUNf,H#I ./£3.<C3 /C)C3 / U0ouU re]CO / akdC Reproduced with permission granted by THOMAS BROS.MAPS. This map is copyrighted by THOMAS BROS.MAPS.It is unlawful to copy or reproduce all or any part thereof,whether for personal use or resale,without permission. N $2000 0 Feet 2000 Vicinity Map Lowe's of Renton Site Renton,Washington Figure I ! I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I U E < X LO 0> ) C Z J LJC0('4 L_00r00u CO j"C3 L // 00 ./"r00 Ur'3 CO -'2 atJ2 SALES AREAliJIi j2.K!_D.E,E!, GARDEN AVENUE NORTH ! Notes: 1.The locations of all features shown are approx[mate. 2.This drawing is for information purposes.It is intended to assist in showing features discussed in an attached document,GeoEngineers,Inc,can not guarantee the accuracy and content of electronic tiles•The master file is stored by GeoEngineers,Inc.and win serve as the official record of this communication. Reference:Drawing reference information. end: A I I A"cross section B-1 Boring CPT-1 Cone Penetration Test 100 0 FEET 100 i Site Plan Lowe's of Renton Site Renton,Washington GEOENGINEER Figure 2 i il GA DEN II AVE N |II1 BNSFPROPOSEDLOWE'S OF RENTON WAREHOUSE RAILROAD lib EXISTING 2O oF-X Ld --10 --20 --50 --40 --50 --6( I0 L,JU3 o',-o IJ{/3 L,_CO0EL.Lo I-"7 0 m d3 LJZ U3£b I ro ELZ EI°Z J3c o J ! I ET 00I'000 "3r'3COJ£:3<.I 0 J £3LU 24-- 50-- 3-- 8-- 5-- 8 6 7-- 12 7-- 21 21-- 18-- 23-- 36-- ,I OO SM i_'.rc ???-- SM -SP -SP-SM PT -SM -ML [PT SM/PT SP-SM --"p -SM/ML -SP-SM ---- Notes: 1.The subsurface conditions shown are based on interpolation between widely spaced exploratJons and should be considered approximate;actual subsurface conditions may vary from those shown. 2.Soil classification on CPT logs based On empirical relationships for tip resistance,fdction ratio, and pore pressure.3.Refer to Figure 2 for location of Section A-A'. 4.This drawing is for information purposes.It is intended to assist in showing features discussed in an attached document.GeoEngineers,Inc.cannot guarantee the accuracy and content of electronic files. The master file is stored by GeoEngineers,Inc.and will serve as the official record. SP/SM FILL --?--?--?--?--?--?--SM/ML -OL/PT SP/SM -SM/ML/CL-UPPER OL/PI ALLUVIALDEPOSITS SP/SM SM/ML [OL/PT ?__------?------?----- ML??-----• SP/SM LOWER ALLUVIALDEPOSITS 92-SP/SM 55- SM/ML 7 - DL/PT 8- SM/ML -20- SP/SM 8- -OL/PT s -ML/CL 26-OL/PT 9--SM/,,MLOL/PT-SM/ML s- MLICL 0 -----?----- -SM/ML ..50/4"-vIj_,LCL-?/2 so/o'- SP/SM I I I200300400 DISTANCE (FEET] Legend: --9 --?-- 25- O3LL0v T Boring Numberm SM Soil Classification Soit Contact Groundwater/Seep Level --Inferred Soil Contacl. Blow Count Offset from Section/ElevaUon (Distonce,Direction) SM (SOUTH EAST) A' -50 :PT SM/PT OL J SM I SM SM I500 -4O -30 -20 10 O -10 -:0 -30 -40 -50 -60 I6OO F-X LU HORIZONTAL SCALE:1"=50' VERTICAL SCALE:1"=20' VERTICAL EXAGGERATION:2.5X Subsurface Profile A-A' Lowe's of Renton Site Renton,Washington Figure 3 I I I I :n= I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I +I < x 0 wZ -@ EoZ o 0 ou 00 00 cO / < / 00 / 00 /E/ £:3wC BNSF .4RAILROAD/ (NORTH EAST)b B 50- 40- 30- 20 1 +°_0 -10 -20 -30 -40 -50 -6( Z btO w ta_LO iI11 __9 __,7"42- 57- IO- U= --9 --9 --9 --q W -o l--WU3LL0v II- 0J EXISTING _/GROUND •PROPOSED LOWE'S OF RENTON WAREHOUSE Z 0 O I O SM/ML VIL/CL [OL/PT -SM/ML/CL -SP/SM -OL/Pr BP/SM [MLOLAPT ?SP/SM" ) SP/SM FILL --9--?--?--?--?--?--SM/ML -OL/PT SP/SM -SM/ML/CL UPPER OL/PT ALLUVIAL DEPOSITS SP/SM SM/ML -OL/PT ____9 i??-- SP/SM LOWER ALLUVIAL -DEPOSITS - (/) "0O3 (/]LLL-o II-n0 SP/SM -O 9 --9 --9s"-•_OL/Pr SM/ML SP/SM OL/PTML/CL OL/PT SM/MLOL/PTSM'/ML ML/CL -SM/ML -ML/CL 9--?--?--?--?- SP/SM OL/PF SP/SM I 'i I0t00200 Notes: 1.The subsurface conditions shown are based on interpolation between widely spaced explorations and should be considered approximate;actual subsurface conditions may vary from those shown. 2.Soil classification on CPT logs based on empirical relationships for tip resistance,friction ratio, and pore pressure. 3.Refer to Figure 2 for location of Section A*A'. 4.This drawing is for information purposes.It is intended to assist in showing features discussed in an attached document.GeoEngineers,Inc.cannot guarantee the accuracy and content of electronic files. The master file is stored by GeoEngineers,Inc.and will serve as the official record. I 'I300400 DISTANCE {FEET) end:U3 "o ----9 --9 25 I 'I500600 u Offset from Section/ElevationL-L (Distance,Direction)s Boring Number SM Soil C;assif;cotion r_Soil Contact -Groundwater/Seep Level --Inferred Soil Contact Blow Count HORIZONTAL SCALE:1"=50' VERTICAL SCALE:1"=20' VERTICAL EXAGGERATION:2.5X Subsurface Profile B-B' Lowe's of Renton Site Renton,Washington[Figure 4 I l l I I l l l I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I ! U3 < X £00 C)LLIZ E]U3 t.Q &-JE0Z 130F-- 0 J (3" 3 qC0 L_00 003 r'3CO J C 0 J 00J 00LO 3CO Q. C21LI \ i DEEEMC ....... °!°;'i! Notes: 1.The locations of all features shown are approximate.2.This drawing is for information purposes.It is intended to assist in showing features discussed in an attached document.GeoEngineers,Inc.can not guarantee the accuracy and content of electronic files.The master file is stored by GeoEngineers,Inc.and will serve as the official record of this communication. Reference:Drawing reference information. end: +B-1 (-16)Boring (Contact Elevation) /&,CPT-1 (-15)Cone Penetration Test (Contact Elevation) ---1 5 ?Approximate contour top elevation of lower alluvial deposits. Actual elevation will need to be vedfied during pile installation, 100 0 100 JillFEET Contour Map Top Elevation of Lower Alluvial Deposits Lowe's of Renton Site Renton,Washington GEOENGINEERS [Figure 5 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I GEOENGINEERS APPENDIX A FIELD EXPLORATIONS ! I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I APPENDIX A FIELD EXPLORATIONS GENERAL We explored subsurface soil and groundwater conditions at the site by drilling seven borings (B-1 through B-7)to depths of 1672 to 80 feet and by advancing live cone penetration test probes (CPT-1 through CPT-5)to depths of 41 ½to 80 feet.The borings were drilled between December 21,2005 and January 3, 2006 using trailer-mounted hollow-stem auger drilling equipment owned and operated by Geologic Drill Explorations.The probes were advanced on December 22 and 23,2005 using truck-mounted equipment owned and operated by Northwest Cone Exploration.The locations of the explorations were estimated by measuring distances from site features with a measuring wheel in the field,and should be considered approximate.The locations of the explorations are shown on the Site Plan,Figure 2. RORINGS The borings were continuously monitored by a geotechnical engineer from our finn who examined and classified the soils encountered,obtained representative soil samples,observed groundwater conditions, and prepared a detailed log of each exploration.The soil samples were obtained from the borings at selected depths using a 1.4-inch-inside-diameter split-barrel sampler (SPT sampler).The split-barrel sampler was driven into the soil using a 140-pound rope-and-cathead hammer free-falling a vertical distance of 30 inches.The number of hammer blows required to drive the sampler the final 12 inches,or other indicated distance,is recorded on the boring logs. Soils encountered in the explorations were visually classified in general accordance with the classification system described in Figure A-1.A key to the boring log symbols is also presented in Figure A-1.Logs of the borings are presented in Figures A-2 through A-8.These logs are based on our interpretation of the field and laboratory data and indicate the various types of soils and groundwater conditions encountered. They also indicate the depths at which these soils or their characteristics change,although the change may actually bc gradual.If the change occurred between samples,it was interpreted.The densities noted on the boring logs are based on the blow cotmt data obtained in the borings and our judgment based on the conditions encountered. The borings were backfilled in general accordance with procedures outlined by the Washington State Department of Ecology.Soil cuttings generated from the borings were placed in 55-gallon drums and stored on site. CONE PENETRATION TESTS The cone penetration test is a subsurface exploration technique where a small-diameter steel tip with adjacent sleeve is continuously advanced with hydraulically operated equipment.Measurements of tip and sleeve resistance allow interpretation of the soil profile and the consistency of the strata penetrated. The tip,sleeve resistance and pore water pressure is recorded on the cone penetration test logs.The logs of the Clq"soundings are presented in Figures A-9 through A-I 3. The CP2"soundings were backfilled in general accordance with procedures outlined by the Washington State Department of Ecology. File No 8335-003-00 Page A-I GEOENGINEER January 26.2005 l I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I MONITORING WELLS Monitoring wells were installed in three of the borings (B-4,B-5 and B-6)following drilling.The monitoring wells consist of 1-inch-diameter schedule 40 PVC pipe.The lower 5 to 10 feet of the pipe is slotted (0.02-inch slot width)to allow entry of water into the well.Clean 10-20 sand was placed in the borehole annulus sun'ounding the slotted portion of the PVC pipe.Bentonite chips were placed above the sand pack to form a surface seal.The monitoring wells are protected by at-grade steel monuments.A graphical representation of the installed monitoring wells is shown on the boring logs.Groundwater levels measured in the monitoring wells are presented in the report text. File No 8335-003-00 Page A-2 GEOICNGINEERS J nuao'26 2005 i I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I SOIL CLASSIFICATION CHART DIVI I N GRAPHSYMBOLSLETTER 1 TYPICALMAJORSOSIDESCRIPTIONSiID%I I WELLGRADEDGRAVEL$GRAVEL- o °Q GW I SNOMIXTURESCLEANGRAVELGRAVELS)r, .vhi {UTLEORNOINE$)O O I POORLy.GRADEOGRAVEL$,I SOLS OQO GRAINEOCOARsE Es ° GRAVELS VTH GM NLT MIXTURESSrLTYGRAVELS GRAVEL"ND " MORE THAN 5G%FINES SOILS CRSEFRCT dl SlavE E I Y NTURE •°,.,•°.,°•°*••SW WELLd3P'E0 ,N0$,GRAVELLY•°.•,NOSCLEANSANDS..... SAND •"••"MORE THAN 50%AND (LnllEC NOelNESRETAINEDONNO ".2OL $EVE SANDy SP POORLy GRADED SANDS,GRAVELLY SAND SOILS OF CORSE FINES :•M3rRE$ pA,ENG NO 4 INOHGANICSILTS,ROCI FLfH.ME OLAYEY SILTSWITH SLHT INOGAN O OIy C LOWTO SILTS LIQjp°LIMPT !eL MEOIUU Pt'TICI/'GRAVELLYCIys,o1Dy CLAYS SILTYCLAYS,FINE AND LESS THAN 50 LEANCLAYS GRAINED CLAYS SOILS eL ORGAN NLTS ANDORGA>C SIL YS OF LOWg'o.TllrY SIEVE SILTS LOUIO LIMIT INANIC CLAysOF HIGH AND GRATE R IHAN /CH TICIT Y CLAys OH ORGIIC CkY SAN0ILT S ME01UM TO HIGH TIClT3t HIGHLYORGANIC SOILS PT HIGHOGNK CONTENT5 ADDITIONAL MATERIAL SYMBOLS SYMBOLS TYPICAL GRAPH LETrER DESCRIPTIONS ----CC Cement Concrete A Asphalt Concrete Crushed Rock/ Quarry Spalls %%.•,***%%%%:g.:.:.:,:-:-:-:,Topsoil/•:.:,:.:.:-:-:.:-:TS Forest Duff/Sod:.:g.:.:-:.:-:-:.,-,,,,.,-,%%,• _Measured groundwater level inexploration,well,or piezometer _Groundwater observed at time ofexploration Perched water observed at time of exploration _Measured free product in well orpiezometer J Strafi.qraphic Contact Distinct contact beWveen soil strata or geologic units Gradual change between soil strata or geologic units Approximate location of soil strata change within a geologic soil unit NOTE:Multip}e symbols are used to indicate borderline or dual soil classifications Laboratory /Field Tests Sampler Symbol Descriptions %F Percent finesALAtterberglimits 2.4-inch I.D.split barrel CA Chemical analysisCPLaboratorycompaction test ]Standard Penetration Test (SPT)CS Consolidation testDSDirectshear HA Hydrometer analysis]Shelby tube MC Moisture content MD Moisture content and dry densityPistonOCOrganiccontent PM Permeability or hydraulic conductivityDirect-Push PP Pocket penetrometer SA Sieve analysis]TX Triaxial compressionBulkorgrab UC Unconfined compressionVSVaneshearBlowcountisrecordedfordrivensamplersasthenumberofblowsrequiredtoadvancesampler12inches(or distance noted).See exploration log for hammer weight and drop. A "P"indicates sampler pushed using the weight of the drilI rig. Sheen Classification NS No Visible Sheen SS Slight SheenMSModerateSheenHSHeavySheenNTNotTested NOTE:The reader must refer to the discussion in the report text and the logs of explorations lOT a proper understanding ol subsurface conditions Oespeptions on the logs apply only at the specific exploration locations and at the time the explorations were made;they are not warranted to be representative of subsurface conditions at other locations or times I I KEY TO EXPLORATION LOGS i GEOENGINEER5 Figure A-1 I I I I I I I I I I I l I I I I I l I Date(s)t 9/ot/no,LoggedDrilled"='=""By DdllingDcllniagclorGeologicDrillMethod Auger 3.75-inch ,O Haamer Total 62 6 SurfaceDepth([I)"Elevation (ft) Vertical Datum/Datum System I sAMPLEs II .5 s a MAfj=_o E z J o>_m >-=_-Z o.° _=m u m £9Ji L9o3°L I I t I [,,,I Ac 4Wi°chosa12Ell::::SM Gray sihy liJ:iII d,o3010922i::iii 5 l0 55 3 i :" -SM Gray silty fiJ 4"I /P I--t t)[[[[.-[;M/PT a si-yfii//l i il I rown pe201286 ///Ibl II ztdlense 5 6 13 9 go gM a 5iii-y f///ll!l :ll (nedium 0 35 ]I 26 10][/[IHIfl Note:See Figure A-1 for explanation of symbals. o1't===,=f Project: EOENGINEERS .[ LCF Checked By Sampling Methods KGO Hollow-stem Auger SPT 140 Ib hammer/30 in drop Drilling Deeprock XL Trailer-mounted rope and cathead Equipment Drill Rig Groundwater 26.534Elevation(ft) Easting(x):Northing(y): MATERIAL DESCRIPTION r-..472 inches asphalt concrete , Gray silty lille to medium sand with gravel (medium dense to very dense,moist)(till) Gray silty fine to medium sand with lenses of gray silt, organic matter (loose,wet)(upper alluvial depos s) peat with coal fragments (medium stiff, Gray silty fine to Oledium sand with layers of dark brown peat (loose.wet) Gray line to coarse sand with silt and occasional gravel and lenses of organic silt (medium dense,wet) 10 OTHER TESTSANDNOTES (oxidation staining) pH=57 %F=26 Brown organic silt (medium stiff,wet) pH =5.1 Gray silty fine to medium sand with occasional gravel (medium dense,wet) (layer with increased gravel content at 31 5 feet LOG OF BORING B-1 Lowe's of Renton Project Location:Renton,Washington Figure A-2 Project Number:8335-003-00 Sheet 1of I t I I ,| I I I I I I I 1 I I I I I SAMPLES 18 9 [I 18 8 t2 50/4"14 50/6"15 m MATERIAL DESCRIPTION brown clay (loose,wet) ML -Bm'n I-wq-tlTs and-(mcditVrnti ff,--wTt)........ CL Gray clay with layers ofdark brown organic silt--(medium stiff,wet) SM Gray silty fine to medium sand with gravel (very dense, wet)(lowcr alluvial deposits) -=8 - Oo " 25 OTHER TESTS AND NOTES AL g LOG OF BORING B-1 (continued) GEOENGINEERS Project:Lowe's of Renton Project Location:Renton,Washington Project Number:8335-003-00 Figure A-:. Sheet 2 of 2 I Date(s)12/21/05 Logged Ddlled By Dnlling Geologic Drill DrillingContractorMethod Auger 3.75-inch ID HammerDataData SurfaceTotal75'Depth (ft)Elevation (ft) Vertical Datum/ Datum System I ES ,+.+:::o+o ,MATI-E z J o r "silty fir i ense to c ,25 5 i •• 4 20 Fo10 7-si]ylrI,forgank 15 15 ..... ra fine to I I 50 20 rartNetol i 30 ;r FbT&;Tn] Io .-t for explanat i NGINEER CheckedLCFBy KGO Sampling SPTHollow-stem Auger Methods 140 Ib hammer/30 in drop Ddlling Deeprock XL Trailer-mounted rope and cathead Equipment Drill Rig Groundwater 21.529Elevation(ft) Easting(x): Northing(y): SAMPLES I -_[g "£,MATERIAL DESCRIPTION--E J o -- _cd m u)Lgj (0o o o E *m oE °-k,[I ,],l..,Ac 4inche.sashahconc.rete ----.I I •SM -Gray silty fine to medlurn sand with grovel (medium4-I I II II dense to dense,wet)(fill) 5ltl[5o /3-"""_ T-/I IL,J<t ML "10 /I 5 [1 I SM .Gysi]yeTomedinTsand Wth-gT-aeand End,s -- t5 --- !5 7 : OH --Gyne ToTncdunTsad-nd--t hTnTarT gan li--- _/I +1 -(loose,wet) 30 vt --rk--bv,Tnpeat (-ndTum ff,weT) Note:See Figure A4 for explanation orsymbols. OTHER TESTS =-.AND NOTES 5.=_= pH =8.3 SA;pH =7.8 %F =1% (6 feet ofheave adding drilling- mud) OC =73% LOG OF BORING B-2 Lowe's of Renton Project Location:Renton,Washington Figure A-3 Project Number:8335-003-00 Sheet 1 of 2 ,i Fay •O V t J Date(s)nt 113"41NR LoggedDrilled•..v By citagctor Geologic Drill 0MII d Auger "7 inch ID HammerDatav.v-Data Total 80 SurfaceDepth(it)Erevation (ft) Vedical Datum/ Datum System I SAMPLES II 5 s MAT--,,£o E z j ._o •:.i SM Brown silty •:---III2SMGraysyfi 25 5 ]8 4 3 i -Ora les to Io 4 P]Dar b'own186-!md (mc t8 4 +SM S,FaSii 5 25 --rganic si 18 6 9 OL -'Dgics] 3o er -b -bFoG: 18 9 L0 _5 35Note:See Figure A I for explanation of symbols ![,o,T Project: LGEOENGINEERSJ I Checked KGOLCFBy Hollow-stem Auger Sampling SP]"Methods 140 Ib hammer/30 in drop Ddlling Deeprock XL Trailer-mounted rope and cathead Equipment Drill Rig Groundwater 2630Elevation(ft) Eastiog(x): Northing(y): MATERIAL DESCRIPTION x27 inches asphalt concreteBrownsiltyfinetocoarsesand with grove[(wet)(fill) Gray silty fine to medium sand with gravel (dense, Grades to loose,wet Dark brown peat with lenses of gray silty title to mediumsand(medium stiff,wet)(upper alluvial deposits) Gray silty fine sand with thin lenses of peat (very loose to loose,we0 Brown organic silt with thin lenses of gray fine tomediumsandwithsilt(medium stiff,wet) Gray silty fine to medium sand with thin lenses of organic silt (medium dense,wet) Orgmlic silt (medium stiff,wet) Dark brown peat (medium stiff,wet) OTHER TESTS .-_-AND NOTES5g pH -70 pll =7.4 OC =20% At+;OC 9% %F=16 pH -46 LOG OF BORING B-3 Lowe's of Renton Project Location:Renton,Washington Figure A-4 Project Number:8335-003-00 Sheet 1 ol3 LCF Checked KGOBy Sampling SPTHollow-stem Auger Methods 140 Ib hammer/30 in drop Drilling Deeprock XL Trailer-mountedropeandcatheadEquipmentDrillRig Groundwater 2630Elevation(ft) Easting(x):Northing(y): MATERIAL DESCRIPTION ,2½inches asphalt concrete Brown silty fine to coarse sand with grovel (wet)(fill) Gayiltyfi to medium--sand--wTth--grvel ns,.... Grades to loose,wet Dark brown peat with lenses ofgray silty fine to medium sand (medium stiff,wet)(upper alluvial deposits) Gray silty fine sand with thin lenses ofpeat (very loose to loose,wet) Brown organic silt with thin lenses of gray fine to nlcdium sand with silt (medium stiff,wet) Gray silty fine to medium sand with thin lenses of organic silt (medium dense,wet) Organic silt (medium stiff,wet) Dark brown peat (medium stiff,wet) .-o o " OTHER TESTSANDNOTES pH :7.0 pH:74 OC =20% AL;OC =9% %F =16 pll :46 LOG OF BORING B-3 Lowe's of Renton Project Location:Renton,Washington Figure A-4 Project Number:8335-003-00 Sheet 1 of 3 Gray silty line sand with thill lenses oforganic maller (loose,,,vet) -Gray fine sand with lenses of organ7 sq]tle,et)------ (soft,wet) Gray fine tomium-snd-(mediu-mdes,moTst)-.... Gray lineo Tn ium-sa d-w-t ITsi mld-tnens s ------ organic silt (medium dense,wet) Gray fine to medium sand with silt (medium dense to very dense,wet)(lower alluvial deposits) _=g o o 39 o i OTHER TESTS E:AND NOTES %F=I{ LOG OF BORING B-3 (continued) Lowe's of Renton Project Location:Renton,Washington Project Number:8335-003-00 Figure A-4 Sheet 2 of 3 I I ! I I I I i I I I I I I I I SAMPLES •-_E z ,_ _oo ;o _,,|'°::1:1 MATERIAL DESCRIPTION OTHER TESTSANDNOTES I I LOG OF BORING B-3 (continued) Project:Lowe's of RentonGEOENGINEERProjectLocation:Renton,Washington Project Number:8335-003-00 Figure A-4Sheet3of3 I Date(s)t3t/n*ln Logged Drilled ,,,v.,vv By Drilling --Dnlling,Contractor Geologic gnJl Method Auger •HammerData3.75-Inch ID Data Total Exploration 1R GroundDepth(if)-.v Elevation (/1) Vertical Datum/ Datum System |_I sAMPLES II •-8 -=J MATEIO1eEO >o_m >m m_Z o_ 0-I AC es asphalt c SM n silty fine t, I -30 -][tlH[tedium dens, 18 29 2 -SA;pH =6.6I--5 ]8 42 3 \ 18 37 25 4 -10 1O 5 2O -SM Gray silty fine san -1 //IIIII dense,wot)(u I :'°II1"/°IIlltl |-"2°1 Gr0undwater m0 -10I -25 !35 ,3o 2) o Notel taration of symbols. I LOG I Project: I GEOENGINEERS-I CheckedLCFBy KGO Hollow-stem Auger Sampling SPTMethods 140 Ib hammer/30 in drop Drilling Deeprock XL Trailer-mounted rope and cathead Equipment Drill Rig GroundwaterGroundSurface32Elevation(ft)23.5 Easting(x): Nodhing(y): MATERIAL DESCRIPTION ,2 inches asphalt concrete Brown silty fine to medium sand with occasional gravel (medium dense to dense,moist)(fill) Gray silty fine sand with trace organic matter (medium dense,wet)(upper alluvial deposits) Groundwater measured on 01/03/06 /- WELLCONSTRUCTION Steel surface=g 5&mon.tE•o I "- crete\surface seal 11 --Bentonite •--1-inch!••,Schedute 80:i .i .'.PVCwell ::iii cas,.g I0 I ::--10-20 sand ----backnH Schedule 80 PVC screen;-:--0020nch::.slot width -- LOG OF BORING B-4 Lowe's of Renton Project Location:Renton,Washington Figure A-5 Project Number:8335-003-00 Sheet 1of 1 i Date(s)ntntn Logged /PE Checked v,'x Drilled un/vuu By L*.*n By ,.-...v Drilling ••Drilling SamplingContractorGeologicDrillMethodHollow-stem Auger Me03ds SPT I Auger n 7-in h r Hammer 140 Ib hammer/30 in drop Drilling Deeprock XL Trailer-mountedData6.O-C U Data rope and cathead Equipment Drill Rig Total Exploration Ground Surface GroundwaterDepth(n)16.5 Elevation (ft)32.5 Elevation (tO 25 Vertical DatunV Easting(x):Datum System Northing(y): I I SAMP'ESI"El I $'3=CONSTRUCTION171I-MATERIAL DESCRIPTION ¢_/3 E z o ----Steesurface>_m >",-Z o-°e =E monurnl Or [I i "':AC .l V2 itlches asphalt concrete /'--- JAil I too,s0 (n,)'.......-/I I I •SM •Gray s!lty fine to medit,m sand with gravel (medium dense,-".4./M ..,",'7,a' 2 15 Benlonite-30 12 I4 •seal " 5 I 3 -----::PVC w41 -:::"10-20 3nd"25 12 4 4 18 :::!:::backfill -i Grades to loose " t0-I-i 18/4 [s "SM -Brown silty fine to nlediurn sand with gravel and organic -95 l-,ncnII/I 'PT q matter.loose,wet)upper alhwial deposits')/-:::I ule eo 41 I .SP-SM:-Gay-filesa,w,h,andorffallcnattrOs,eO------I "11 °II '''GroundwatermeasuredonOI/03/06"- ° ,,o,t I Note:See Fi,ure A-I for explanation of symbols.35 o I i -o OF OR,N--- 1 --,-I Project:Lowe'sofRenton]GEOENGINEERS /'Project Location:Renton,Washington,o Fgure A 6>---,'I Project Number:8335-003-00 Sheet 1 of 1 I Da'es)ntJn'/n Logged /PE Checked Drilled u//v,a/uu By -'-""By clnlitnragctor Geologic Drill DM%I d Hollow-stem Auger SMah%nsg I Auger 3 75 inch ID Hammer 140 Ib hammer/30 in drop Drilng Data ""Data rope and cathead Equipmer t Total I Surface 35 GroundwaterI::"Z'°+:7:'9 EE;;':'"'Datum System Norfhlng(y i "i _SA+'ES in _E=MATERIAL DESCRIPTION II •o I o1 I+lot=o --- 5VI I I Cll:l I (P "1 inch base courseJAII/IITI SMfMLL Graysa vel(vcrystiffmhard, /I I /hs'[l:SM i--FE ----- 25 10 12 35 5I PT Dark brown peat(medium !tiff to stl ff,mos0 (upperII1///1 I-''"v''+o''+>" I +oh .........;"1 t -1 20 -ll 25 0 35 " I -5 30 I Not:See Figure A-I for explanation of symbols. 1 Project:Lowe s of Renton I {GEOENGINEER Project Location:Renton,Washington KGO SPT Deeprock XL Trailer-mounted Ddll Rg 34.25 OTHER TESTS AND NOTES SA;pH =Z7 -l% Figure A-7 i I I I I I I I I l |I I I ! I ! Date(s)Logged CheckedOdlled01103106ByLCFBy KGO Delli.ng Geologic Drill Dllo Hollow-stem Auger Sampling SPT.,omractor Methods Auger 3 75 inch ID Hammer 140 Ib hammer/30 in drop Ddlling Deeprock XL Trailer-mounted Data "-Data rope and cathead Equipment Drill Rig Total Exploration Ground Surface GroundwaterDepth(fl)16.5 Elevation (if)33 Elevation (ft)25.5 Veriical Datum/Lasting(x): L Datum System Norq ig(y): SAMPLES I WELL I CONSTRUCTION 1 1 5 I =MATERIAL DESCRIPTION -a=--OJ .0 E Z 0 ---],Steel surface 53 D o o 'E ca o E .-c .+c m m m +L9 Oo L) -°L.,I I ,+AC --=1¾inchesasphalte°nerete ---4=..L+,j -/•GP -\li.cht,eco,,e /-C rete J/I I ::SM Brownish gray silty fine to medium sand with gravel ,surface seat -r 01 27 I 2 •.-(medium dense to dense,moist)(fill)"4-.--'I -pH =7.7 tonite -5-'2 43 3 i ---..sea,"--+_+__?_++n°_pH =6,0 --10-20 sand -d PT Dark brown peat (medium stiff,moist)(upper alluvml ckn,-t°ll'+l+I '"-d+po+it)-m,+l,::i - -I I rl +'':-+++,++++s+,mois+_I-::+-i:\_ -m J I I "sP-s,'.,-+Cay-fiEesa+wiThmti-adYhm +ne-ofo++icnaer --|-.:"s+.m -, --I I /..-(loose wet)-I..oo20-mcn -°l+l'l+,:L ---15 20 1 Groundwater measured on 0l/03/06 -1(3 -25 35 Note:See Figure A-I for explanation of symbols. i-LOG OF BORING,B-7 1 .]Project:Lowes of Renton !l GEOENGINEERS /j I Pr°jectL°cati°n:Renton,Washington >J Project Number:8335-003-00 Norihing(y):, Figure A-8 t Shee ,I Lowe o, en,on 1/iiTIPRESISTANCEFRICTIONRATIOFs/Qc PORE WATER PRESSURE /I /oc(kf)(o,.)(.sf)//0 200 400 600 800 0 2 4 6 8 10 .10 -5 0 5 10 / 0 ,,F ,0 ''I '0 i ]I :.,,:,:i ::,....:-: ,, 00,'!, I ;I°i _:I °1-iiI °I :I !I !i i i i i !;! ::!i i i i i I i i "i !i i :.; ,, Eart]l Science +Technology GURE A-9 | I I I I i I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I E c _a F- 0 oL 0 Q Q 0 o Lowe's of Renton CPT-2 10 2o 3o 4o 5o 6o 7o 8o TIP RESISTANCE Qc (ksf) 0 200 400 600 800 L 4 ] S <-: FRICTION RATIO Fs/Qc (%) 0 2 4 6 8 10 0 L 'I 10 :, 20 :•::. 1 ;50 f 70 8O PORE WATER PRESSURE (ksf) -10 -5 0 5 10 0 :! 10 .(: 20 ::i : r30I 40 < 7 50 :t ; 1 60 :':" : "270 : 80 GEOENGINEER Earth Science +Technology CONE PENETROMETER DATA CPT-2 FIGURE A-10 g I Lowe's of Renton l CPT-3 TIP RESISTANCE FRICTION RATIO Fs/Qc l uc (KSq (%) 0 200 400 600 800 o 2 4 6 8 10 o L I I °t i i i ;:,ii I --oJ ',:, 'i I o-o ,60 60 I ,°'° I GEOENGINEER Earth Science +Technology! PORE WATER PRESSURE (ksf) -10 -5 0 5 10 0 i I'1 1 1 : i : 1 20 ":i 1 1 : 30 1,, 40 1 -:( 1 ;1 ; 50 60 r ; ; 170: CONE PENETROMETER DATA CPT-3 FIGURE A-11 l I i I l I I I ! I "Z F-O4 QIo QO 0 0o c ! a Lowe's of Renton CPT-4 TIP RESISTANCE FRICTION RATIO Fs/QcQc(ksf)(%) 0 200 400 600 800 o 2 4 6 8 lO I I I IoIoil 10 -!--10 g 30 40 :i :i 50-::: 60 : S i :40 :: 50-: i : :i 60- PORE WATER PRESSURE (ksf) -10 -5 0 5 10 0 'q ;: i : 10 : ; ; :i 40 i : ; 50 1 60 GEOENGINEER Earth Science +Technology CONE PENETROMETER DATA CPT-4 FIGURE A-12 I,[ owe o, en,on 1I/|TIP RESISTANCE FRICTION RATIO Fs/Qc PORE WATER PRESSURE |1 I oc(.f)(o/o)(k,f)o 5 //0 200 ,400 600 800 0 2 4 6 8 10 -10 -5 101 [oL I I o_,.I °l ':|"'''1, :0 20 20 I o 4o 4o , 9 ,o li91 GoE....I-"/3URE A-13 .I ! I I l I I I I l I I I l I I I I I I I GEOENGINEERS APPENDIX B LABORA TORY TESTING I I I I I I I g I I I I I l I I I I APPENDIX B LABORATORY TESTING GENERAL Soil samples obtained from the explorations were transported to our laboratory and examined to confirm or modify field classifications,as well as to evaluate engineering properties of the soil samples. Representative samples were selected for laboratory testing consisting of moisture content determinations, gradation analyses (lull sieve and percent U.S.No.200 Sieve),Atterberg Limits testing,organic content analyses,California Bearing Ratio testing and pH testing.These are discussed in more detail below. MOISTURE CONTENT TESTING Moisture content tests were completed in general accordance with ASTM D-2216 for representative samples obtained fiom the explorations.The results of these tests are presented on the exploration logs in Appendix A at the depths at which the samples were obtained. FULL SIEVE ANALYSES Full sieve analyses were performed on selected samples in general accordance with ASTM D-422.The wet sieve analysis method was used to determine the percentage of soil greater than the U.S.No.200 mesh sieve.The results of the sieve analyses were plotted,classified in general accordance with the USCS,and presented in Figure B-1. PERCENT PASSING U.S.NO.200 SIEVE Selected samples were "washed"through the No.200 mesh sieve to determine the relative percentages of coarse and fine-grained particles in the soil.The percent passing value represents the percentage by weight of the sample finer than the U.S.No.200 sieve.These tests were conducted to verify field descriptions and to determine the fines content for analysis purposes.The tests were conducted in general accordance with ASTM D-1140,and the results are shown on the exploration logs at the respective sample depth. ATTERBERG LIMITS TESTING Atterberg limits testing was performed on selected fine-grained soil samples.The tests were used to classify the soil as wclI as to evaluate index properties.The liquid limit and the plastic limit were estimated through a procedure performed in general accordance with ASTM D-4318.The results of the Atterberg limits testing are summarized in Figures B-2 and B-3. ORGANIC CONTENT ANALYSIS Organic content tests were completed on selected peat and organic silt soil samples.The organic content of the soils was estimated in general accordance with ASTM D-2974.The results of the organic content tests are shown on the exploration logs at the respective sample depth. Fde No.8335-003-00 Page B-1 GEOENGINEERS January 26,2005 I I I I I l CALIFORNIA BEARING RATIO TESTING CBR (California Bearing Ratio)tests were performed on two bulk samples obtained from the borings. The CBR tests were performed in general accordance with the ASTM D-1883 test procedure.The maximum dry density (MDD)and optimum moisture content of the bulk samples were determined in general accordance with ASTM D-1557.The results of the MDD and optimum moisture contents tests are presented in Figures B-4 and B-5.Table B-l summarizes the CBR test results. Table B-1.CBR Values at 0.1 Inch Penetration Sample 10 Blows 25 Blows 56 Blows Location CBR Density (%MDD)CBR Density (%MDD)CBR Density (%MDD) B-2 and B-4 12 90 31 94 45 97 B-5 and B-7 2 86 12 91 23 93 i l ! PH TESTING We completed pH testing on thirteen soil samples obtained from the borings.The pH tests were completed in general accordance with the ASTM D-4972 test method.These tests were intended to serve as indicators of the corrosion potential of the on-site soils.Tests results are presented on the boring logs and summarized in Table B-2. Table B-2.Summary of pH Test Results ! I ! ! ! ! Exploration Sample Depth Soil Classification pH B-1 B-2 B-2 B-2 B-2 B-3 B-3 B-3 B-4 B-5 B-6 B-7 B-7 10 28.5 2.5 5 38.5 0.5 2.5 35 2.5 2.5 2.5 2.5 9 PT OL SM SM SM/PT SM SM PT SM SM ML SM SM/PT 5.7 5.1 8.3 7.8 5.6 7.0 7.4 4.6 6.8 6.6 7.7 7.7 6.0 I I I File No.8335-003 O0 Page 1-2 GEOENGINEERS Jf Januar)'26.2005 I I I \oZ UJ jLLI C'4 U3 C)n_-- | p.cqOzIioo zI0 0 0 w 6I I I /GEo E FIGURE B-2I/ ATTERBERG LIMITS TEST RESULTS 6'II o I o F-oq []o <</.--p_x .I -.-\,-,I o 59I0ono_- ....oII'--...\o-o-,"..5 .,- I CO ',..\o u_I 5 --".......\oIQ--,,.....\I I T'.......\ I I I b I I ".......d '," ,,o} 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ,I XqGNI A_LIOIISVqd °° '!I I I 0 5 10 15 I !!iii ':' I ,iii-...... I I ,,,,, I MOISTURE CONTENT (%OF DRY WEIGHT) 20 25 30 35 '''-iii-'......'-'-'iii iiii................::i:::i::i::i::::::i:::i::i:::i::::::::i::i:::=:::: .....L ii .....................ii Hi i ;i .... ....................................-...........""3"'";'""]......7"-3"["'F-- ii iilil ill i il iiii:i i-..............J...l..,...J.....t-J.........J....,_. :il il lO0%Saturation .:._.+..+.. i i (Gs=2.65)- ................:i:i:i::*:...............I I :I"-'?!?1 ii:ii SOIL CLASSIFICATION Gray silty fine to medium sand with gravel (SM) OPTIMUM MOfSTURE CONTENT 6.5 COMPACTION TEST RESULTS FIGURE B-4 MAXIMUM DRY DENSITY (LBS/FT) 137.1 l I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I "T :>2 C) g g co IJ_ cO >- ZWa n D 150 145 0 MOISTURE CONTENT (%OF DRY WEIGHT) 5 10 15 20 25 30 "Ti-,TI ]-]......i-i .....T FF i-"i iii]iii T- -i+il i-i-ii--fiiii ....i i+i ......iii ......i-',-iiff!ii!i!:i :+!:i:i:i!!!i!i:+i:it:i:iii i!ii:i:t::ii:i!i:140 135 130 125 120 115 110 !05 100 95 9O ""?"fll i"!'"t""!"-!-""....:"'r"'-':....ii ""-r]:+7]]7L]]E !E-EIW]EII]W]]Z[EIZEZEI ::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::i:::i::i:::i:::i::i :::t:::!::::::::i::: !-':i......!i +,:!..+.!i-.i.-i...i-.:--i-J.-i---i....i............L-i ....:..................--:::!:: J.iili..lii_.i[.-iii I.-.*....L.ii ........I_ii J_..l._............... SAMPLE BORING NUMBER NUMBER B-5 &B-7 Composite SOIL CLASSIFICATION Gray silty fine to medium sand with gravel (SM) NOTE:Tests performed in accordance with ASTM D 1557 OPTIMUM MOISTURE CONTENT 5.3 COMPACTION TEST RESULTS FIGURE B-5 35 MAXIMUM DRY DENSITY (LBS/FT3) 140.3 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I GEOENGINEERS APPENDIX C REPORT LIMITATIONS AND GUIDELINES FOR USE I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I i I APPENDIX C REPORT LIMITATIONS AND GUIDELINES FOR USEI This appendix provides information to help you manage your risks with respect to the use of this report. GEOTECHNICAL SERVICES ARE PERFORMED FOR SPECIFIC PURPOSES,PERSONS AND PROJECTS This report has been prepared for the exclusive use by Lowe's HIW Inc.,PacLand,and their authorized agents.This report is not intended for use by others,and the in[brmation contained herein is not applicable to other sites. GeoEngineers structures our services to meet the specific needs of our clients.For example,a geotechnical or geologic study conducted for a civil engineer or architect may not fulfill the needs of a construction contractor or even another civil engineer or architect that are involved in the same project. Because each geotechnical or geologic study is unique,each geotechnical engineering or geologic report is unique,prepared solely for the specific client and project site.Our report is prepared for the exclusive use of our Client.No other party may rely on the product of our services unless we ag'ree in advance to such reliance in writing.This is to provide our firm with reasonable protection against open-ended liability claims by third parties with whom there would otherwise be no contractual limits to their actions. Within the limitations of scope,schedule and budget,our services have been executed in accordance with our Agreement with the Client and generally accepted geotechnical practices in this area at the time this report was prepared.This report should not be applied tbr any purpose or project except the one originally contemplated. A GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING OR GEOLOGIC REPORT IS BASED ON A UNIQUE SET OF PROJECT-SPECIFIC FACTORS This report has been prepared for the Lowe's of Renton site in Renton,Washington.GeoEngineers considered a number of unique,project-specific factors when establishing the scope of services for this project and report.Unless GeoEngineers specifically indicates other,vise,do not rely on this report if it was •not prepared for you, •not prepared tbr your project, •not prepared for the specific site explored,or •completed before important project changes were made. For example,changes that can affect the applicability of this report include those that affect: •the function of the proposed structure; •elevation,configuration,location,orientation or weight of the proposed structure; •composition of the design team;or •project ownership. If important changes are made after the date of this report,GcoEnginecrs should be given the opportunity to review our interpretations and recommendations and provide written modifications or confirmation,as appropriate. Deve oped b sed o aterial prov ded by ASFE,Professional Firms Practicing in the Geoscienccs;www.asfe org. File No 8335-003-00 Page C-1 GEOENGINEERS January 26.2006 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I i SUBSURFACE CONDITIONS CAN CHANGE This geotechnical or geologic report is based on conditions that existed at the time the study was pertbrmed.The findings and conclusions of this report may be affected by the passage of time,by nranmade events such as construction on or adjacent to the site,or by natural events such as floods, earthquakes,slope instability or groundwater fluctuations.Always contact GeoEngineers before applying a report to determine if it remains applicable. MOST GEOTECHNICAL AND GEOLOGIC FINDINGS ARE PROFESSIONAL OPINIONS Our interpretations of subsurface conditions are based on field observations from widely spaced sampling locations at the site.Site exploration identifies subsurface conditions only at those points where subsurthce tests are conducted or samples are taken.GcoEngineers reviewed field and laboratory data and then applied our professional judgment to render an opinion about subsurface conditions throughout the site.Actual subsurface conditions may differ,sometimes significantly,from those indicated in this report.Our report,conclusions and interpretations should not be construed as a warranty of the subsurthce conditions. GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING REPORT RECOMMENDATIONS ARE NOT FINAL Do not over-rely on the preliminary construction recommendations included in this report.These recommendations are not final,because they were developed principally from GeoEngineers'professional judgment and opinion.GeoEngineers'recommendations can be finalized only by observing actual subsurface conditions revealed during construction.GeoEngineers cannot assume responsibility or liability for this report's recommendations if we do not perform construction observation. Sufficient monitoring,testing and consultation by GeoEngineers should be provided during construction to confirm that the conditions encountered are consistent with those indicated by the explorations,to provide recommendations for design changes should the conditions revealed during the work differ from those anticipated,and to evaluate whether or not earthwork activities are completed in accordance with our recommendations.Retaining GeoEngineers for construction observation for this project is the most effective method ofmanaging the risks associated with unanticipated conditions. A GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING OR GEOLOGIC REPORT COULD BE SUBJECT To MISINTERPRETATION Misinterpretation of this report by other design team members can result in costly problems.You could lower that risk by having GeoEngineers confer with appropriate members of the design team after submitting the report.Also retain GeoEngineers to review pertinent elements of the design team's plans and specifications.Contractors can also misinterpret a geotechnical engineering or geologic report. Reduce that risk by having GeoEngineers participate in pre-bid and preconstruction conferences,and by providing construction observation. DO NOT REDRAW THE EXPLORATION LOGS Geotechnical engineers and geologists prepare final bonng and testing logs based upon their interpretation of field logs and laboratory data.To prevent errors or omissions,the logs included in a geotechnical engineering or geologic report should never be redrawn for inclusion in architectural or other design drawings.Only photographic or electronic reproduction is acceptable,but recognize that separating logs from the report can elevate risk. File No.8335 003-00 Page C-2 GEOENGINEERS Jamrary 26.2006 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I GIVE CONTRACTORS A COMPLETE REPORT AND GUIDANCE Some owners and design professionals believe they can make contractors liable for unanticipated subsurface conditions by limiting what they provide for bid preparation.To help prevent costly problems, give contractors the complete geotechnical engineering or geologic report,but preface it with a clearly written letter of transmittal.In that letter,advise contractors that the report was not prepared for purposes of bid development and that the report's accuracy is limited;encourage them to confer with GeoEngineers and/or to conduct additional study to obtain the specific types of int'ormation they need or prefer.A pre- bid conference can also be valuable.Be sure contractors have sufficient time to perform additional study. Only then might an owner be in a position to give contractors the best infomlation available,while requiring them to at least share the financial responsibilities stemming from unanticipated conditions. Further,a contingency for unanticipated conditions should be includcd in your project budget and schedule. CONTRACTORS ARE RESPONSIBLE FOR SITE SAFETY ON THEIR OWN CONSTRUCTION PROJECTS Our geotechnical recommendations are not intended to direct tile contractor's procedures,methods, schedule or management of the work site.The contractor is solely responsible for job site safety and for managing construction operations to minimize risks to on-site personnel and to adjacent properties. READ THESE PROVISIONS CLOSELY Some clients,design professionals and contractors may not recognize that the geoscience practices (geotechnical engineering or geology)are far less exact than other engineering and natural science disciplines.This lack of understanding can create unrealistic expectations that could lead to disappointments,claims and disputes.GeoEngineers includes these explanatory "limitations"provisions in our reports to help reduce such risks.Please confer with GeoEngineers if you are unclear how these "Report Limitations and Guidelines for Use"apply to your project or site. GEOTECHNICAL,GEOLOGIC AND ENVIRONMENTAL REPORTS SHOULD NOT BE INTERCHANGED The equipment,techniques and personnel used to perform an environmental study differ significantly from those used to perform a geotechnical or geologic study and vice versa.For that reason,a geotcchnical engineering or gcologic report does not usually relate any environmental findings, conclusions or recommendations;e.g.,about the likelihood of encountering underground storage tanks or regulated contaminants.Similarly,environmental reports are not used to address geotechnical or geologic concerns regarding a specific project. BIOLOGICAL POLLUTANTS GeoEngineers'Scope of Work specifically excludes the investigation,detection,prevention or assessment of the presence of Biological Pollutants.Accordingly,this report does not include any interpretations, recommendations,findings,or conclusions regarding the detecting,assessing,preventing or abating of Biological Pollutants and no conclusions or inferences should be drawn regarding Biological Pollutants, as they may relate to this project.The term "Biological Pollutants"includes,but is not limited to,molds, fungi,spores,bacteria,and viruses,and/or any of their byproducts. It"Client desires these specialized services,they should be obtained from a consultant who offers services in this specialized field. File No.8335-003-00 Page C-3 GEOENGINEER Janlmo,26 2006 o 4 D 4 I L ......"'....""1 .......HOME CENTERS,INC" ""\.....l 4/.J =--..--J I IDATE DESCRIPTION I',,,,%.3 ,oo.;L i F2I, ', lktlllt . ll I lll 111111 t llllll Itl I I I \\\\\.... EX \_\cE..s.,c.mY USE o..e.OOU,ON ,..\',k/,,,_w.o..o.T,sP.o.,.rr.w,mou.T.. .,.,,_____",.I ! i O.N oC:o "", PA,,et A,.ERS ....,,.,.Cow.mAR mEe , "..,\:,9_o I x x x x------x x x x "DISPLAY .' _\\Ill I'I',EXlSTING I"\\I CO I i SHADE i 'I Im'l IN .i I.I 'VETETATION'O ,]..ACCESS ,-.!...--...."--"Z,I ...........27°_i:i_..X \:..----'"""GARDEN "'I ,__,_...0 .IREMAINTYP.\\x..:__....,__=__l- .".."':-UTILITY EASEMENT,\'4 '"t "'.CENTER ".,............-.;I I ...'''X"..-'REDUCTION TO 1,3.9 -"':#"'r "'""''""--Ik'L''""i----""RECEIVING -.....".....,.-,.....m i.i .....'.....""'":WIDTH PROPOSED CITY '--EXISTING20"'",EN.i =rT3']'I IOF,,,,ON ...n,--...----.---.......---k" "P,ANTING NOTFS-L.,,NDSCAPE CALCULATIONS {!/1.ALL PLANTS MUST BE HEALTHY,VIGOROUS MATERIAL,FREE OF PESTS AND 12.ANY PLANT MATERIAL WHICH DIES,TURNS BROWN,OR DEFOUATES (PRIOR TO II D'kRF:laG LOT LANDSCAPING I l DISEASE.TOTAL ACCEPTANCE OF THE WORK)SHALL BE PROMPTLY REMOVED FROM THE SITE A.PARKING LOT TREES ,- ....--,,..-,i,=--m ,r--r.,,,,I--"--Ft-r-r--i mllall At'V II 3.ALL TREES MUST BE STRAIGHT TRUNKED AND FULL HEADED AND MEET ALL 13.STANDARDS SET FORTH IN "AMERICAN STANDARD FOR NURSERY STOCK"II m I Ir'i-iI--L_llVlll l,n//RED IN S All NS 0 Y AND H TU I B.TOTAL PARKING LOT LANDSCAPINGHLANIUHI:::I.)UL k ,--.----REQUIREMENTS SPEC,.REPRESENT GUIDEL E PECIFIC 0 NL S ALL CONSTI TE M NIMUM Z:.-,.--I14.ALL PLANTS ARE SUBJECT TO THE APPROVAL OF THE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT QUAUTY REQUIREMENTS FOR PLANT MATERIAL II REQUIRED LANDSCAPING (35 SF/STALL)=14,980S.F.I iMONNAMTUYMIEULI l°t L INI ,/JMIVIUIXl IXl,lVlL BEFORE,DURING,AND AFTER INS_TALiA__TIO_N_.....14.ALL SHRUB,GROUND COVER AND SEASONAL COLOR ANNUAL PLANTING BEDS PROVIDED LANDSCAPING =15 581 S.F.E-o SYMBOL COM II 5.ALL TREES MUST_BE_6U..YI__D OR SIA.K.ED A.S S.HOWII../N ]JE^DET.A/LS ARE TO BE COMPLETELY COVERED WiTH BARK MULCH TO A MINIMUM DEPTH OF TWO 11 o 'I _.I o 1YO'.TREE 'cLC°"°""OL,RU ,,,,LLPLA,,O,,,,,,U,,,O,L,L,,UL,o*,,",,OH,,,,O,,,,L.L,O,._'"-'Z' ,=l UUNIPLK[bMALL )]i Ommmrm/ourrrm mLUC OH,\UU .--,--.LOCATING ALL UNDERGROUND UTIUTIES AND SHALL AVOID DAMAGE TO ALL UTIUTIES BASED UPON BEST AVAILABLE INFORMATION AND ARE TO BE CONSIDERED R PARKING LOT LANDSCAPING =15 581 S.F.< r4 I WEEPING ALASKAN CEDAR l LAURELS,BARBERRY,HOLLY //DURING THE COURSE OF THE WORK.THE CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR APPROXIMATE.IT SHALL BE THE RESPONSIB,UTY OF THE CONTRACTOR TO VERIFY I/PERIMETE 'I •LARGE SHRUB SPECIES:REPAIRING ANY AND ALL DAMAGE TO UTILITIES,STRUCTURES,SITE APPURTENANCES,THE LOCATIONS OF UTILITY UNES AND ADJACENT TO mE WORK AREA.mE rF ILlICON!F#R(LARGE)I LAPHOTINIA/LAUREL/PRIVET/MYRTLE/vIBuRNUM II ETC.WHICH OCCURS AS A RESULT OF THE LANDSCAPE CONSTRUCTION.CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR THE PROTECTION OF ALL UTIUTY UNES DURING I I I <__z 1iAUSTRIANPINEI,,r-re,m,,c'uDeen encmec(:;,I /8.mE CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR VERIFYING ALL QUANTITIES SHOWN ON THE CONSTRUCTION PERIOD.I I ..I ___,,--i IDDEEIuHIRRffffEEfEIppI,NN(SG Iv,r_u,u,v,,)nruD .r-r_.L.,r....ii"WORK,O JZII!IC THESE PLANS BEFORE PRICING THE 16.SAFE,CLEARLY MARKED PEDESTRIAN AND VEHICULAR ACCESS TO ALL ADJACENT or),)OTTO LUYKEN LAUREL/PIERIS/EUONYMUS/CISTUS Y MAINTAINING ALL PLANTING __-I--"O o lii LOT SHADE)OnPACLA\ONIA/MUGHO PINE/DAVID S VIBURNUIVI 10.THE CONTRACTOR SHALL COMPLETELY GUARANTEE ALL PLANT MATERIAL FOR A SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR COMPLETE COVERAGE OF ALL PLANTING BEDS AT l/-o,c.,?;!i o! _SMALL SHRUB SPECIES..(INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO.WATERING.SPRAYING.MULCHING.FERTILIZlNG.17.DURING THE GROWING SEASoN ALL ANNUALS sHALL REMAIN IN A HEALTHY.II I _/,z_ilDECIDUOUSTREE(PARKING LOT SHADE).9.THE CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE.FOR FULL PROPERTIES MUST BE MAINTAINED THROUGHOUT THE CONSTRUCTION PROCESS....I I::::1 !.1.1 I--- FLOWERING CHERRY OR PEAR AZALEA DWARF HEAVENLY BAMBOO/COMPACT HOLLY/MOWING,ETC.)OF mE PLANTING AND LAWN AREAS UNTIL mE WORK IS ACCEPTED IN VITAL CONDITION THROUGHOUT THE CONSTRUCTION PERIOD..,,,.m i ,,,l/'TOTAL BY THE OWNER.18.ALL PLANT MATERIALS QUANTITIES SHOWN ARE APPROXIMATE.CONTRACTOR DEVELOPMF-IxrIII-tNtNL "-'-u_,0 \I )I SWEETGUM,ASH I kI\VJIII.)bVVLI\II PERIOD OF ONE (I)YEAR BEGINNING ON THE DATE OF TOTAL ACCEPTANCE.THE SPACING SHOWN GRAPHICALLY:II DEC 1 4 200 \I II Iy I OR,G,NAL I"-L_I,.,,^,,..-..-.,,,,-I nr'npATIVF:II CONTRACTOR SHALL PROMPTLY MAKE ALL REPLACEMENTS BEFORE OR AT THE END 19._ALL__AREA_S_A_R_E_TO RECEIVE.......4"OF tOPSOIL.ALL LANDSCAPE BED AREAS II ...-,,,,=r,sTATE OF --1 ULUIUUUUb /IXLLbr'LblML d)-'"'"-//OF THE GUARANTEE PERIOD.ARE TO RECEIVE ol-IOFOmLo //lr.,,rlv=,,,....u.,.,',-r.I PERMITSET IARTULIPTREEKINNIKINNICK/CEANOTHUS 11.AFTER BEING DUG AT THE NURSERY SOURCE.ALL TREES IN LEAF SHALL BE 20.REFER TO SPECIFICATIONS FOR ALL INFORMATION NEEDED FOR IMPLEMENTATION .(,.,v ISSUE DATE" (COLUMN ."LIMATED FOR TWO 2 WEEKS UNDER A MIST SYSTEM PRIOR TO INSTALLATION.OF PLANTING PLANS.REGIS CONS--LIIC!L!!!A!ITU!!I!I!II;TI >1B.BACKGROUND.PEf 4ETER.//ACC ()21.ALL LANDSCAPED AREAS ARE TO BE WATERED VIA AUTOMATIC IRRIGATION //t UR'EUNUMAPLE'\LLkJ"\L-L-'/BAIilK;iERROUND PE!/IETER:[I S2EIMsTALL A WEED BARRIER IN ALL LANDSCAPE BED AREAS (SEE SPECIFICATIONS)./]"".0 rr - LObL C5 C:3 c'q Q Cb £3 I r-.. C3 03 L c c5 r Q d2 I CAD/CALC J DRAWN PLAT CHKJ FW FW/DMB I SYM RECORD LEGAL DESCRIPTION:EASEMENT EXCEPTIONS CONT: PER FIRST AMERICAN TITLE INSURANCE CO.ORDER NO.NCS-171106-SA1,DATED SEPTEMBER 25TH,2005 AT 7:30 A.M.THAT PORTION OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER AND THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 8,TOWNSHIP 23 NORTH,RANGE 5 EAST, WILLAMETTE MERIDIAN,IN KING COUNTY,WASHINGTON,DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: BEGINNING AT THE INTERSECTION OF THE SOUTH LINE OF SAID NORTHWEST QUARTER WITH THE EASTERLY MARGIN OF GARDEN AVENUE NORTH,AS CONVEYED TO THE CITY OF RENTON BY DEED RECORDED UNDER RECORDING NUMBER 5535459; THENCE SOUTH 89"28'22"EAST ALONG SAID SOUTH LINE 603.26 FEET TO A MONUMENT IN CASE HELD AS THE CENTER OF SAID SECTION;THENCE SOUTH 89"30'10"EAST 35.59 FEET TO A POINT ON THE WESTERLY MARGIN OF THE PACIFIC COAST RAILROAD CO.RIGHT OF WAY,SAID POINT BEING UPON A CURVE TO THE RIGHT,FROM WHICH THE CENTER BEARS NORTH 52"20'58"EAST,810.39 FEET; THENCE NORTHERLY ALONG SAID MARGIN AN ARC LENGTH OF 277.62 FEET TO THE POINT OF TANGENCY; THENCE NORTH 18"01'40"WEST ALONG SAID WESTERLY MARGIN 1,995.11 FEET TO AN INTERSECTION TH THE SOUTHERLY MARGIN OF THE WASHINGTON STATE HIGHWAY (PSH-1)NORTH RENTON INTERCHANGE A-LINE RIGHT OF WAY; THENCE SOUTH 49"05'06"WEST ALONG SAID SOUTHERLY MARGIN 406.82 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 31"55'55"WEST ALONG SAID SOUTHERLY MARGIN 62.78 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 08"39'15"EAST 47.07 FEET TO A POINT ON THE EASTERLY MARGIN OF SAID GARDEN AVENUE NORTH; THENCE SOUTH 18"00'30"EAST ALONG SAID EASTERLY MARGIN 1,289.97 FEET TO THE POINT OF CURVATURE OF A CURVE TO THE RIGHT HAVING A RADIUS OF 910.00 FEET;THENCE ALONG SAID MARGIN CURVING TO THE RIGHT,AN ARC LENGTH OF 293.83 FEET TO THE POINT OF TANGENCY; THENCE SOUTH 00"29'31"WEST ALONG SAID EASTERLY MARGIN 255.42 FEET TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING. NOTE:SURVEY COVERS ONLY THAT PORTION OF THE SITE TO BE PURCHASED BY LOWE'S. 1.LIEN OF THE REAL ESTATE EXCISE SALES TAX AND SURCHARGE UPON ANY SALE OF SAID PREMISES,IF UNPAID. AS OF THE DATE HEREIN,THE EXCISE TAX RATE FOR THE CITY OF RENTON IS 1.78%. 2.GENERAL AND SPECIAL TAXES AND CHARGES,PAYABLE FEBRUARY 15,DELINQUENT IF FIRST HALF UNPAID ON MAY 1,SECOND HALF DELINQUENT IF UNPAID ON NOVEMBER 1 OF THE TAX YEAR (AMOUNTS DO NOT INCLUDE INTEREST AND PENALTIES; YEAR:2005 TAX ACCOUNT NUMBER:082305-9217-00 LEVY CODE:2100 3.CONDEMNATION OF ACCESS TO STATE HIGHWAY NUMBER 1 (SR 405)AND OF LIGHT,VIEW AND AIR BY KING COUNTY DECREE TO STATE OF WASHINGTON: SUPERIOR COURT CAUSE NUMBER:656127 4.RELINQUISHMENT OF ALL EXISTING AND FUTURE RIGHTS TO LIGHT,VIEW AND AIR,TOGETHER WITH THE RIGHTS OF HIGHWAY CONSTRUCTED ON LANDS CONVEYED BY DOCUMENT IN FAVOR OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON. RECORDED:JULY 15,1966 RECORDING NUMBER:6078423 ACCESS TO AND FROM THE STATE SAID INSTRUMENT IS A RE-RECORDING OF INSTRUMENT RECORDED UNDER RECORDING NUMBER 6065436. 8.COVENANTS,CONDITIONS AND RESTRICTIONS AND/OR EASEMENTS: RECORDED:NOVEMBER 17,2000 RECORDING NUMBER:20001117001354 9.COVENANTS,CONDITIONS AND RESTRICONS AND/OR EASEMENTS: RECORDED:NOVEMBER 17,2000 RECORDING NUMBER:20001117001355 TAX PARCEL NUMBER 082305 9217 O0 10.DEED OF TRUST AND THE TERMS AND CONDITIONS THEREOF: GRANTOR:DASH-80 LP.,A WASHINGTON UMITED PARTNERSHIP TRUSTEE:U.S.BANK TRUST COMPANY,NATIONAL ASSOCIATION BENEFICIARY:U.S.BANK NATIONAL ASSOCIATION AMOUNT:$17,000,000.00 DATED:NOVEMBER 19,2003 RECORDED:NOVEMBER 19,2003 RECORDING NUMBER:20031119002577 EASEMENT EXCEPTIONS: 11.SUBORDINATION,NON-DISTURBANCE AND ATTORNMENT AGREEMENT,AND THE TERMS AND CONDITIONS THEREOF: BETWEEN:DASH-80 LP.,A WASHINGTON LIMITED PARTNERSHIP AND:FRY'S ELECTRONICS,INC. RECORDED:NOVEMBER 19,2003 RECORDING NUMBER:20031119002578 SPECIAL EXCEPTIONS FROM SCHEDULE B FIRST AMERICAN TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY Order No.NCS-171106-SA1DATED SEPTEMBER 25TH,2005 AT 7:30 A.M. GEOGRAPHICALLY LOCATABLE ITEMS FROM SAID REPORT (SUCH AS EASEMENTS) HAVING AN EFFECT ON THE SUBJECT PROPERTY ARE SHOWN ON THIS PLAT AND ARE NUMERICALLY KEYED TO SAID REPORT. OTHER ITEMS LISTED IN SCHEDULE B OF SAID REPORT WHICH EFFECT THE TITLE TO THE SUBJECT PARCEL ARE NUMERICALLY KEYED TO SAID REPORT AND ARE AS FOLLOWS WITH PLOTTABLE ITEMS SHOWN WITH A TRIANGLE ENCLOSING A NUMBER ON SHEET 2 AND 3 THIS SURVEY: 13.TERMS,CONDITIONS,PROVISIONS AND STIPULATIONS OF THE PARTNERSHIP AGREEMENT FOR DASH 80 L.P.,A WASHINGTON LIMITED PARTNERSHIP. 14.EVIDENCE OF THE AUTHORITY OF THE OFFICERS OF LOWE'S HIW,INC.TO EXECUTE THE FORTHCOMING INSTRUMENT,COPIES OF THE CURRENT ARTICLES OF INCORPORATION,BY-LAWS AND CERTIFIED COPIES OF APPROPRIATE RESOLUIlONS SHOULD BE SUBMITTED PRIOR TO CLOSING. 15.A CERTIFICATE OF FORMATION FOR LOWE'S HIW,INC.,IS NOT CURRENTLY ON FILE WITH THE SECRETARY OF STATE,AS REQUIRED BY STATUE. 16.MATTERS OF EXTENDED OWNER/PURCHASER COVERAGE WHICH ARE DEPENDENT UPON AN INSPECTION AND AN ALTA SURVEY OF THE PROPERTY FOR DETERMINATION OF INSURABILITY. 17.UNRECORDED LEASEHOLD&IF ANY. @ EASEMENT AND THE TERMS AND CONDITIONS THEREOF: PURPOSE:PUBLIC UTILITIES,INCLUDING WATER AND SEWER,WITH NECESSARY APPURTENANCES AREA AFFECTED:A STRIP OF LAND 20 FEET IN WIDTH PARALLEL WITH AND ADJOINING TI4E EASTERLY MARGIN OF GARDEN AVENUE NORTH. (PLOTTED) GRANTEE:CITY OF RENTON RECORDED:SEPTEMBER 23,1988 RECORDING NUMBER:8809230146 6.EASEMENT AND THE TERMS AND CONDITIONS THEREOF: GRANTEE:PUGET SOUND POWER &LIGHT COMPANY,A WASHINGTON CORPORATION PURPOSE:ELECTRIC TRANSMISSION AND/OR DISTRIBUTION SUBSTATION AND ONE OR MORE TRANSMISSION AND/OR DISTRIBUTION LINES AREA AFFECTED:SOUTH PORTION OF FRY'S ELECTRONIC STORE AREA AND OTHER PROPERTY.DOES NOT AFFECT PORTION TO BE PURCHASED BY LOWE'S. GRANTEE: RECORDED:JULY 13,1992 RECORDING NUMBER:9207130661 EASEMENT AND THE TERMS AND CONDITIONS THEREOF: PURPOSE:115KV POWER TRANSMISSION AND DISTRIBUTION LINES AREA AFFECTED:PORTION OF SAID PREMISES.(PLOTTED) GRANTEE:PUGET SOUND POWER &LIGHT COMPANY,A WASHINGTON CORPORATION RECORDED:FEBRUARY 3,1994 RECORDING NUMBER:9402030482 SAID EASEMENT HAS BEEN AMENDED BY INSTRUMENT RECORDED UNDER RECORDING NUMER 9405202038. 12.EASEMENT AND THE TERMS AND CONDITIONS THEREOF: PURPOSE:WATER UTILITIES AREA AFFECTED:SOUTH PORTION OF FRY'S ELECTRONIC STORE AREA.DOES NOT AFFECT PORTION TO BE PURCHASED BY LOWE'S. GRANTEE:CITY OF RENTON RECORDED:DECEMBER 23,2004 RECORDING NUMBER:20041225001308 SURVEY NOTES: HORIZONTAL DATUM:MAD 83/91.BASED ON GPS MEASUREMENTS FROM CITY OF RENTON MONUMENTS #3736 (E 1/4 CORNER 8-23-5)&RENT1847. BASIS OF BEARINGS =S 89"28'22"E ON MONUMENTED SOUTH LINE OF NW 1/4 SECTION 8-2.5-5. VERTICAL DATUM:NAVD 88 PER CITY OF RENTON CONTROL POINT NO.RENT1935;CHISELED SQUARE IN CONCRETE BASE OF TRAFFIC SIGNAL AT NORTHWEST CORNER OF INTERSECTION OF LAKE WASHINGTON BLVD.N.AND PARK AVE.N.ELEVATION =30.431 TOTAL SITE AREA:+930,875 SQ.FT.(+21.37 ACRES)NOTE THIS AREA IS FOR ALL OF TAX LOT 082305-9217.THE SURVEY AREA COVERS ONLY THE NORTHERLY PORTION OF THIS SITE. ALL DISTANCES SHOWN ARE GROUND DISTANCES UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. THE LOCATION AND DESCRIPTION OF ALL SURVEY MARKERS SHOWN HEREON ARE BASED ON FIELD OBSERVATIONS TAKEN IN AUGUST OF 2005,UNLESS OTHERWISE INDICATED THE PRIMARY CONTROL WAS ESTABLISHED USING FAST STATIC GPS AND INTERMEDIATE POINTS WERE ESTABLISHED USING CONVENTIONAL TRAVERSE METHODS.THE TRAVERSE WAS ADJUSTED USING A LEAST SQUARE ADJUSTMENT.THE LARGEST ANGULAR RESIDUAL IS 10 SECONDS THE LARGEST DISTANCE RESIDUAL IS 0.03 FEET THE LARGEST ERROR ELLIPSE OF 95 %CONFIDENCE IS 0.08'X 0.07'THE ERROR OF CLOSURE OF THE CLOSED LOOP TRAVERSE WAS EQUAL TO OR GREATER TtlAN 1:50000 THIS TOPOGRAPHIC SURVEY DRAWING ACCURATELY PRESENTS SURFACE FEATURES LOCATED DURING THE COURSE OF THIS SURVEY.UNDERGROUND UTILITIES SHOWN HEREON ARE BASED SOLELY UPON INFORMATION PROVIDED BY OTHERS AND PACE ENGINEERS INC.DOES NOT ACCEPT RESPONSIBILITY OR ASSUME LIABILITY FOR THEIR ACCURACY OR COMPLETENESS.CONTRACTOR/ENGINEERS SHALL VERIFY EXACT SIZE AND LOCATION PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION.CALL FOR LOCATE:UTILITY LOCATION SERVICE: 1-800-425-5555 PROPERTY IS LOCATED WITHIN ZONE "X"WHICH IS DEFINED AS "AREAS DETERMINED TO BE OUTSIDE THE 500 YEAR FLOOD PLAIN".PER FLOOD INSURANCE HAlE MAP NUMBER 53033C1250 F MAP REVISED MAY 16,1995. WORK PERFORMED IN CONJUNCTION WITH THIS SURVEY UTILIZED THE FOLLOWING EQUIPMENT AND PROCEDURES:(A)ALLEN OSBORN RASCEL GPS RECEIVERS USED IN REAL rIME KINEMATIC SURVEY MODE (B)2"GEODIMETER 600 SERIES ELECTRONIC TOTAL STATION,MAINTAINED TO THE MANUFACTURE'S SPECIFICATIONS PER W.A.C.332-130-100.(C)FIELD TRAVERSE,EXCEEDING REQUIREMENTS SET FORTH IN W.A.C.332-130-090. REVISED PER NEW TITLE REPORT BY FIRST AMERICAN RE SION AND REVISED CERTIFICATION 11/50/05 DATE mi FW BY I w APP'D An Engineering Services Company 1601 2nd Avenue Suite 1000 Seattle,WA 98101 p.206.441.1855 1 f.206.448.7167 Civil I Structural I Planning I Survey paceengrs.com RENTON LOWE'S GARDEN AVE.N.AND N.PARK ST. RENT ON ,W A SHING TON VICINITY MAP NOT TO SCALE NW 114 SECTION 8-23-5 SCALE 1:400 FND MON IN C W/COPPER PIN IN CONC L=330.30'NOTE:SOLID SYMBOLS= FOUND MONUMENT WITH DETAILS ON FOLLOWING SHEETS OTHER CORNERS CALCULATED FROM KING COUN SURVEY DATA FND MON IN BRASS DISC W/PUNCH CONC 8-15-05 N18"OO'30"W 100.76' FND MON IN CASE W/COPP PIN IN CONC R=572.52' L=428.27'-- FND MON IN CASE W/COPPER PIN IN CONC \ \\\OFSURVEY\ \\\\\ \\I NOTE:SEE SURVEY SHEETS FOR ADDITIONAL PROPERTY LINE GEOMETRY SITE TAX LOT t #9217 5 $70"14'09"W 231.26' \\ \\ LAT=47"30'O0" LONG=122"11 '58" 7 FND MON IN CASE'-" 2"BRASS CAP FOUND CONG.MONUMENT TH COPPER TACK DN.1.0' VISITED 8/12/05 L=284.14'EXISTING FRY'S ELECONIC STORE $89"28'22"E --/603.26'DEED &CALC. FOUND CONC.MON WITH COPPER TACK ACCEPTED AS CENTER OF SECTION. V S TED 8 2/05 A.L.T.A.CERTIFICATION: HEREBY CERTIFY TO JONES WALDO HOLBROOK &Mc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lL S.CABBAGE LS #23345 DATE 10/14/05 SCALE AS SHOWN SURVEY EAM IW-JE/BF-MM BELl)BOOK 336 &ELEC. DWG FIE :\5760-ALTA PORTION OF:NW 1/4,NE 1/4,SECTION DEVELOPMENT PLANNINGCiTYOFRENTON DEC 1 4 2005 RECEIVEb 08,T.25 N.,R.5 E.,W.M. ALTA/ACSM LAND TITLE SURVEY FOR PACLAND I r1 NOTE:SEE SHEET 2 FOR FOUND MONUMENTS ON HOUSER ST. 0.39' L=277.62'(DEED) L=277.65 (CALC.) TAIL $890'10"E DEED S89"30'16"E MEAS. /2647.61'TO EXISTING CENTER OF SECTION FOUND CONG.MON. WITH COPPER TACK VISITED 8/12/05 MON. DETAIL S.OF THEO.i ,.E --N \ x \N89"30'10"W,t i !v" PROJECT NO. 05770.10 - HE T 1 OF 3 m II II cov.b 4j ,, 4 4j CO Cbc'q -J 0 c3 t cO 4J Cb 2 c5r ucb coDQ_/ FOR ADDITIONAL TOPO DETAIL SEE LOWER RIGHT /1 '\\ /i \,/,"\\ /J\\\II kS-'"""-';,s.8 '"'"'''1 1 \\ ,,..i \"...."'\'CB RIM=47.41 .'"\io /11I\\x\\\\\•IE 12"CMP N)=43.81 ...,".."/.-9.\\/./\\\,_=_,\IE 12"CMP(SE)=45.81 ',"-\\\.,,,"",\/1 \\\\\\\ CL CHNL 8"CONC(N/S)=19.67 FND W/PUNCH BOLLARD---, POWER/TEL CABINETS NOTE:HATCHED AREA FOR EASEMENT OVER R.R.R/W IS UNRECORDED. INFORMAON WAS PROVIDED BY BARTLETT ENGINEERS FOR BNSF RR. <II/ /¢ / / ASPHALT ] CL CHNL 8"CONC(N/SE)=17o99 IE 24"CMP(N)=27.04 IE 24"CMP(SE)=27.14 MON IN CASE BRASS DISC W/"X" (14.00'LT OF C/L)10+73.79 PC RIM=34.22 18"CONC(N)=26.62 18"CONC(SE)=26.82 15"PVC(W)=27.02 0+p--SD RIM=34.03/IE 24"CMP(NW)=30.43 /IE 8"CMP(E)=30.63 ,'.4.X /IE 24"CMP(SE)=30.53 FND MON ,N CASEt,1.=5"BRASS DlSC"1 \tN CONC (-"-'5)\\\ IE IE % RIM=34.06 12"PVC(NW)=27.7"" 15"PVC(NE)=27.51 15"PVC(S)=27.56 IE 1VC(SW)=27.76 <+52.35' \TRANSMI£JON TOWER h H()USER WAY \OVERHEAD "P OER RUNS W/E/SE\ BM 1094-36.12 SET PACE PK NAIL AND WASHER EL=53,43 SD RIM=33.76 IE 15"PVC(N)=28.01 IE 15"PVC(S)=28.06 IE 15"PVC(W)--29.96 CB RIM=33.50 IE 12"PVC(SW)=29580 IE 12"PVC(E)=29.80 00zP LEGEND WATER VALVE FIRE HYDRANT [] ®@ [] WATER METER MANHOLES (SS/SD) CB POWER/UTILITY POLE GUY ANCHOR POWER TRANSFORMER POWER/TRAFFIC SIGNAL HAND HOLE PEDESTRIAN CROSSING LIGHT W SS SD G UGP UGT UP/UT FO -.TRAFRC SIGNAL LIGHT (:)STREET LIGHT X 35.50 SPOT ELEVATION _u_SIGN SET BENCHMARK R/W RIGHT OF WAY LINE 3O GRAPHIC SCALE 0 15 30 60 NOTE:SPOT ELEVATIONS HAVE BEEN TURNED OFF FOR PURPOSES OF CLARITY.TO VIEW THAW LAYERS SN-*.*-P I DATE 10/14/05 SCALE 1"=30' SURVEY EAM FW-JE/BF-MM RED BOOK 336 &ELEC. DWO RLE :\5760-ALTA PORTION OF:NW 1/4,NE 1/4-,SECTION 08,T.2,.3 N.,R.5 E.,W.M. AL r /ACSM L AND TITLE SURVEY FOR PACLAND CENTER LINES RIGHT-OF-WAY LINES PROPERTY LINES FLOW LINE WATER LINE SANITARY SEWER LINE STORM DRAIN LINE GAS LINE UNDERGROUND POWER LINES UNDERGROUND TELEPHONE LINES UNDERGROUND POWER/TELEPHONE LINES UNDERGROUND FIBER OPTIC LINES CHAIN LINK FENCE DEVELOPMENT PLANNING CITY ,,,.c ,-.",.'-. DEC I ,',2005 RECEIVED q PROJECT NO. 05770.10 SHEET 2 OF II ii! £o S Leb q:£b qb Ok:CO Oea r-F C3 CO LJ Cb L*j m<c qb <5rFLOqb Jb J X I J $ i ] I i '1r O d ] 16.)MOUNT ALL SLIDING GATES ON OUTSIDEOFENCLosURE CRITERIA 17.)EXT.CONTROL JOINTS SHOWN ON A-2.0.ISSUE DATE:03.01.05 18.)ALL CMU HAVING EXTERIOR AND INTERIOR PERMIT SETEXPOSURES,NOT GROUTED,SHOULDRECEIVEFOAMFILLEDINSuLATIoN.ISSUE DATE: --19.)AT CUSTOMER LOADING CANOPY AND CONsTRUcTION SET 396'-8"I ]1"GARDEN CENTER COVERED AREA,PAINT],ALL EXPosED METAL,STEEL AND METAL ISSUE DATE:-i .G.-...DEN CENTER O..".W.sFROOFDECKING WHITE UNLESS SPECIFIED DRAWING NUMBER: 1A FLOOR PL#NI B I LCiOR PLAN o,o,o,____,A-I .0SCALE:1":20'-0"'1"=20'-0",0j;-;;,: ,•• I I I EL =44.00' cL OF I r.LsuST K4o IIN.-/h9 I 13e&8e.ooo (v)3e&8.22 (F)I I,m',,,c.IIT.O.L58'-PARAPET4"+/-I I I 8 l"%'%"°'='--'mL'I i ROO F ELEV.X.\I L ----u3 "-/"',"/'"/'""---"--':""--"''"Ir'L"''"°I ....IRTL -',,,|'T'"ft//d L_lll /--------.................-.____!,...............,i ......,.;'- i "-IF 32'-0"1 '9 6g"_-LIN_OF SIG,flT I.B SCALE:NONE I t2.01.0494kD-A-20 F.F.ELEV. :52'.-O" +/-44'-0" :,OF GARDEN AVE.LINE ()F SI(;HT 1 "-[' SCALE:NONE LP CObE 4 CRITERIA ISSUE DATE:03.01.05 °! PERMIT SET ISSUE DATE: CONSTRUCTION SET ISSUE DATE: DRAWING NUMBER: kl.lA i FEVISlONS I I ©'&;#'#te A '?ttT IFINISHES_INSTALL ROOF MEMBRANE I DATE DESCRIPTION I I F-1 FACTORY BLACK VINYL COATED FAD.PF-1 SIIRIF/&IWIE(IIE(BRE-(FIRIBSHED)SUPPLIER PROVIDED ROOF I//l,/o z:A EOPIIrrD I I (CHAIN-LINK FABRIC)PF-2 LOWE'S MEDIUM 13EI/-(IPRE--IFIHISIHED)WALKWAY PADS W/MAX I I I I I F-2 FACTORY BLACK POWDER COATEDI(SECURITY FABRIC)PF 3 MANUFACTURERS STANDARD WHITE ,LOW,:LOH'" .O 0''ii!D I P-3 LOWE'S DARK BBIAgE (PNNT)EF-3 LOWE S BEDi]JI(E.6RY)(E.I.F,S.) I P--4 LOWE'S RED (PAINT)EF-I LOWE'S BI (£I.(E)I.F.S.) ROOF TOP HVAC I I [ I 2"01 CHAIN-LINK FENCE WITH BLACK VINYL COATED FABRIC (SEE SHEET A-7"OANDIIIP-SSECT.4.01 BUILDINGOSHA10530).YELLOWExPANSIoN(PAINT)JoINT.IF-II LOWE'S WIIE EII3ES(.I.I.F.S.)V ----..................................%L._"""i-I !/-"SCALE:1 112"=I'-0 L----BATT INSULATION I P-6 MANUFACTURERS STANDARD B&-5 IEIIID/GII (ltl)) .BRIGHT WHITE (PAINT)NA NATURAL ANODIZED (ALUM.) /NOTE.SEE SPECIFICATIONS FOR APPROVED MANUFACTURERS.UNLESS SPECIFICALLY CALLED C]yE RJ/OCT CONTACT ANUFAOTU E.LOW S N ,ON,L ACCOUNT COLO <<III I t UNIT,SIZE VARIES,i I IIKEOSi------}()C)i )()())/)()i ii i ,REFER MECHANICAL ,, /1.01 SIGNAGE-FURNISHED AND INSTALLED BY OWNER (LOWE'S).SEE SHTS.A/3.1,3.2 FOR /BLOCKING LOCATIONS.HORZ.POSITION OF SIGNAGE TO BE CENTERED ON I \/--------ll MEMBRANE/INSULATIoNINSTALLROOF II II /BACKGROUND ELEMENT.;2 I "\//'CRICKET W/MIN I ' SLOPE OF 1/4"I I /SPECIFICATION SECT.02822).t PER FOOT I I /2.02 TUBE STEEL FENCE WITH BLACK SECURITY FABRIC UP TO 8'-0"A.F.F.(SEE SHEET A-,.O ROOF WALKWAY I I /AND SPECIFICATION SECT.02822). /2.03 TUBE STEEL GATE (SEE SHEET A-7.0 FOR SIZE 8(:TYPE,AND SPECIFICATION SECTION 02800).'9 PAD LAYOUT I I /2.03 CHAIN-LINK GATE (SEE SHEET A-7.0,FOR SIZE AND TYPE,AND SPEC.SECT.02822)SCALE:1/4"=1'-0"••/2"04TRENCH DRAIN (SEE DETAIL 11/S-3"0'SHEET P-1 AND P-3'AND SPEC SECT'15431)'I I /2.05 48"HIGH x 75'LONG GUARDRAIL/FENCE (SEE DETAIL 9/S-3.0) /3.01 CONCRETE RETAINING WALL W/6"HIGH CONCRETE CURB (SEE SHEETS S/1.0 AND S/3.0).---METAL FLASHING /3.02 CONCRETE SIDEWALK.WRAP SINGLE PLY I I //ROOFING OVER TOP OF I II3.03 TACTILE WARNING GROOVES IN CONCRETE (SEE SHEET S-&O).//CURB.TYP.I I3.04 CONCRETE FILLED ISLAND (SEE STRUCTURAL &:CIVIL DRAWINGS)./3.o,CONCRETE TRANSFORMER PAD,VERIFY SIZE &LOCATION PRIOR TO POURING (SEE .UNIT SIZE,-I ///--PRE-FABRICATED I ISEEMECH.-I ///INSULATED STRUCTURAL I IISHEETS*-0 •S-O)SHTS.///STEEL CURB,FABRICATE I I I 3.06 CONCRETE GENERATOR PAD VERIFY SlZE &LOCATION PRIOR TO POURING (SEE THIS SURFACEL /CURB ASSEMBLY TO FIT I IllI7111/}/SLOPE OF ROOF TO I I I SHEET A-4.O &S-I.0).I "rll %1 /ALLOW FOR A LEVEL I I I 3.07 CONCRETE SLAB ON GRADE (SEE STRUCTURAL DRAWINGS).i -zl IIL TOP OF CURB I II3.08 JOINT SEALANT WITH BACKER ROD (SEE SPECIFICATION SECT.07920).I I /--SEAM PLATE WITH I I I 3.09 CONCRETE CONTROL JOINT (SEE SHEET S-3.0)._1 Itl/FASTNERS @ 2"I I"1 I co x I I/,.o=MASONRY CONTROL JOINT,TYPICAL (SEE SHEETS A-5.0 &S-3.1).I I I1 /ISINGLE PLY I I /4.03 SINGLE SCORED SMOOTH FACE CMU.---I I I I I p--4 ROOFING MEMBRANE I I ,4.04 SPLIT FACE CMU._-1'---IAKE #XE CsRB I I,.oo.oo..c .u I \I'.\ii]EI4.o6 BULLNOSE CMU ACCENT BLOCK.=-......THICKNESS AS THE I I /5.04 STEEL TUBE,PAINTED.[10.01.o ROOF ,cc DD ,,NTD (,Z -0>--TYP HVAC EQUIP T/A-2"2)'/5.0SFORKLIFT DAMAGE PREVENTION BARS-16'-0"L,W/DOT.@ 9'-6"A.F.[.(SEE SHEET .--]1 /8.3)q CURB SECTION I ,.//5"07 FORKLIFT DAMAGE PREVENTION BARS-7'-O"L W/BOTTOM @ 9'-4"A'F'F"(SEESHEETA-2"2)"@ --LA[)DER W/2'6"%'SCALE:11/2"=1'-0"I .1 I /5.08 FORKLIFT DAMAGE PREVENTION BARS-16'-0"L W/BOTTOM @ 13'-6"A.F.F.(SEE /SHEET A-2.2).X :).'-6"ROOF.. POVD.PP BOLerOs DT.L O.B .NO LOOTONS i/ARCHITECTURAL PLANS AND DOOR DETAILS .[ I,I X/51°PROVIDE 6"PIPE BOLLARDS (SEE DETAIL 3/S-3"1)-NUMBER AND LOCATIONS PER I 'IIARCHITECTURALPLANSANDDOORDETAILS.I--<I 5.11 PROVIDE 6"PIPE BOLLARDS (SEE DETAIL 3/S-3.1)AT GAS METER.NUMBER AND (8)-.......................I OF) I LOCATION PER PLUMBING PLANS.n;OI'"ST..L O0.N.POU.COV.,P*NT O (...D.....,*.0>I ----I I/6"01 CART GUARD -P'T"2x'O STAINED LIGHT GRAY'MOUNTED 5"A'F'F"TO BOTTOM WITH 2/A-1.I \I ==._.Ii/="ox,"x o,(COUNTERSUNK)@ 36"O.c..O <? /6.02 TELEPHONE BOARD -4x8 SHEET PLYWOOD @ 4"A.F.F.WITH INTUMESCENT COATING ON I JlLlll'Jll_ILl Z Z LO IIALLSIDESPRIORTOINSTALLATION(SEE SPECIFICATION SECTION 07812). ]7.01 ACRYLIC FINISH SYSTEM,BYE.I.F.S.MANUFACTURER,ON SMOOTH FAOEDCMUWlTH [,:_L,FLUSH JOINTS.(------'-----=---....------I---II I I00111(/3 --LLI--iObob Ld >rJ _../7.02 EXTERIOR INSULATION AND FINISH SYSTEM (E.I.F.S.).C/)I--13£"LLI /7.03 STANDING SEAM ARCHITECTURAL METAL ROOF PANEL.I |I Jl CO .-z I] oo!M o>-,-/7.04.PRE-FINISHED METAL COPING.I <o(3 __13_/>.0 MEDALLION-E.I.F.S.(SEE SHEETS A-2.1,A-3.1,A-3.2 AND A-3.3)_CRICKET w/1/4"I I //7"06 CORNICE E'I'F'S"WITH PRE FINISHED METAL COPING (SEE SHEETS A 2"1'A-3"1'A-3"2ANDA-3.3)PTyEpR"FOOT SLO iPE'_i/i NOT USED /7"°7 PRE-FINISHED METAL FASCIA"..........SIN-LE ..........I LOWE'SHIW'INC"I /---COMPRESSIBLE TUBE I CARLSBAD CA92008 I/8.01 OVERHEAD DOOR.I 1530 FARADAY AVE.,SUITE 1401 /8.02 HOLLOW METAL DOOR AND FRAME TYPICAL,PAINTED.P DIAMETER GREATER I 'I /8.03 ALUMINUM STOREFRONT.IRN(OjFILNIoVERRE#"spTItCsK RtGD ITHAN DECK OPENIN(3 1760,804.5300 (V)760.918.9112 (F)I SINGLE PLY •• HORIZONTAL.........//---/---ROOFIN(3 MEMBRANE I THICDRAWlNGICTHEPROPERTYOF LOWECHIW,INC.I/8 AUTO-SLIDER DOOR (SEE SHEET A-6.0).----_. /8.05 IMPACT DOOR (FACTORY FINISH),STEEL TUBE FRAME PAINTED._XHAN31UN //qlkl/l:"o,y #rn-,,IANYUETO"WETP#OOuDUTCT)ON'PNFL#O'@ T's I ///,NTOO.o oo..2oo.,9.01 UNOBSTRUCTED PATH,AS DIMENSIONED SHALL MEET ALL GUIDELINES FOR ACCESSIBILITY JOINT "'"'"""'""CON ,,m////MEMBRANE I RIGHTS RESERVED I /TO BE PAINTED OSHA YELLOW.SEAM PLATE \///CONTINUOUS OVER •• F TENERS EXPANSION JOINT/9"0212"HIGH LETTERS PAINTED WHITE ITH,,FoAS. T E NMER? ///I I 1 10.01 ALUMINUM CANOPY -50'-0"x5'-0"-MOUNT @ 15'-4"A.F.F.(SEE SPECIFICATION \\I ///--2X WOOD BLOCKING I I I I/L.\\///CONT.MATCH I I I I 10.02 ALUMINUM CANOPY -5'-0"x5'-0"-MOUNT @ 8'-0"A.F.F.(SEE SPECIFICATION DEPTH OF .,G,D I I I I /SECT.10530).INSULATION /10-03 ALuMINuM CANOPY -12'-0"x5'-0"-MOUNT @ 11'-4"A'F'F"(SEE SPEcIFIcATION r I J.VIII /SECT.10530).7.0-4}--__i,%__I'------RIGID INSULATION I I ;..I I/11.01 TRASH COMPACTOR-FURNIsHED AND INSTALLED BY OWNER (LOWE'S).--METAL ROOF DECK I /kM I I/11.02 DOCK LEVELER-EDGE-OF-DOCK MOUNTED (SEE SPECIFICATION SECT.11160).Xi /"1 "'"---->Ji:-ik"-."--ROOF JOIST ,,, /11.03 DOCK LEVELER-PIT-MOUNTED (SEE SHEET A-5.0 AND S PEC.SECT.11160).1 REFER STRUCTURAL I(I I /11.04 DOCK SHELTER (SEE SHEET A-2.'AND SPECIFICATION SECT.'1160)HTyVpAC CURB.( /13.01 SHADE STRUCTURE OPAL POLYcARBoNATE PANELS OVER STRUCTURAL L_Jj ''"--18 GA.SHEET METAL I ',II |...........CONT.-REFER STRUCTuRALI •I I /13.02 RETRACTABLE sHADE FABRIC SYsTEM ,SEE SPECIFICATIONS SECT.13015).........J --ANOHoRAT32"O.C.I Ill xJ-\:L --2"x 6"(MIN.)x 20 GA.I !•I I "v--.-rx2<CONT.LBENT P FLASHING I I I I @ WALL (PAINT TO I I I I ).-,.,,.,.-.....-.....-.-...,.-M!E:RB /MATCH WALL)I"'IASED--SEALANT IIIIl I !i!!!u FRF INDG IOELL ;f#E ROOF EXPANSION T T..........k/E LIITE 1-L ......'-'""r JOINT AT WALL IiSCALE:1 1/2"=1'-0"m 0 ,,BE)IND MA'N 1 I 0 Z _ c \'''I""--' 'CRITERIA ISSUE DATE:03.01.05 li(ROO F :!:'LAN ISSUE DATE: CALL:1"=-- I II T__ O'20'40'60'120154,A,--I 1 •• @ • •--....RE /ISIONS,f PRE-BID SET /POST BID SET-'ISSUE DATE"FINIE;i'IE -,,ISSUE DATEKEYNrESr--}""DATE DESCRIPTION 1.01 SIGNAGE-FURNISHED AND INSTALLED BY OWNER (LOWE'S).SEE SHTS.A/3.1,3.2 FOR SECT.10530).[le[,@:'¢a [lct),Mrf"ftc BLOCKING LOCATIONS.HORZ.POSITION OF SIGNAGE TO BE CENTERED ON 10.02 ALUMINUM CANOPY -5'-0"x5'-0"-MOUNT @ 8'-0"A.F.F.(SEE SPECIFICATION BACKGROUND ELEMENT.SECT.10530). 2.01 CHAIN-LINK FENCE WITH BLACK VINYL COATED FABRIC (SEE SHEET A-7.0 AND 10.03 ALUMINUM CANOPY -12'-0"x5'-0"-MOUNT @ 11'-4"A.F.F.(SEE SPECIFICATION SPECIFICATION SECT.02822).SECT.10530). 2.02 TUBE STEEL FENCE WITH BLACK SECURITY FABRIC UP TO 8'-0"A.F.F.(SEE SHEET A-7.0 11.01 TRASH COMPACTOR -FURNISHED AND INSTALLED BY OWNER (LOWE'S). AND SPECIFICATION SECT.02822).11.02 DOCK LEVELER -EDGE-OF-DOCK MOUNTED (SEE SPECIFICATION SECT.11160). 2,,03 TUBE STEEL GATE (SEE SHEET A-7.0 FOR SIZE &TYPE,AND SPECIFICATION SECTION 02800).11.0,.3 DOCK LEVELER -PIT-MOUNTED (SEE SHEET A-5.0 AND SPEC.SECT.11160). 2.03 CHAIN-LINK GATE (SEE SHEET A-7.0,FOR SIZE AND TYPE,AND SPEC.SECT.02822)11.04.DOCK SHELTER (SEE SHEET A-2.1 AND SPECIFICATION SECT.11160) 2.04 TRENCH DRAIN (SEE DETAIL 11/S-3.0,SHEET P-1 AND P-3,AND SPEC SECT.15431).13,01 SHADE STRUCTURE -OPAL POLYCARBONATE PANELS OVER STRUCTURAL 2.0548"HIGH x 75'LONG GUARDRAIL/FENCE (SEE DETAIL 9/S-3.0)TUBING SYSTEM (SEE SPECIFICATION SECT.13123). 3.01 CONCRETE RETAINING WALL W/6"HIGH CONCRETE CURB (SEE SHEETS S/1.0 AND S/3.0). 3.02 CONCRETE SIDEWALK.,. 3.03 TACTILE WARNING GROOVES IN CONCRETE (SEE SHEET S-3.0). 3.04 CONCRETE FILLED ISLAND (SEE STRUCTURAL &CIVIL DRAWINGS). 3.05 CONCRETE TRANSFORMER PAD,VERIFY SIZE &LOCATION PRIOR TO POURING (SEE GENERAL NOTES: SHEETS A-4.0 &S-1.0).1.)F.O.M.-FACE OF MASONRY 3.06 CONCRETE GENERATOR PAD VERIFY SIZE &LOCATION PRIOR TO POURING (SEE 2.)F.O.C.-FACE OF CURB SHEET A-4.0 &S-1.0).3.)A.M.O.-ACTUAL MASONRY OPENING(CLEAR DISTANCE REQUIRED) 3.07 CONCRETE SLAB ON GRADE (SEE STRUCTURAL DRAWINGS).4.)ALL DIMENSIONS TO FINISHED FACE ,t8 I 3.08 JOINT SEALANT WITH BACKER ROD (SEE SPECIFICATION SECT.07920).OF WALL OR MATERIAL OR AS OTHERWISE (.kC)NOTED.,,,'8 3,09 CONCRETE CONTROL JOINT (SEE SHEET S-3.0).5.)SEE WALL TYPE LEGEND FORWALL6.)A.F.F.ABOVE FINISHED FLOOR (SALES .)4..01 BUILDING EXPANSION JOINT.CONST-'RaUCTION"C 2 C '2}(C (i)C 4 C :C J 4..02 MASONRY CONTROL JOINT,TYPICAL (SEE SHEETS A-5.0 &S-3.1).).ooR Y 0 ••4-.03 SINGLE SCORED SMOOTH FACE CMU.7.)SEE SHEET A-6.0 FOR DOOR SCHEDULE .',4""r',.°"jOr...uJ I I II..j4..04 SPLIT FACE CMU.8.)SEE SHEET A-7.0 FOR GATE SCHEDULE la-I 3..o o u').,. 4..05 SMOOTH FACE CMU.9.)SEE STRUCTURAL SHEETS FOR CONCRETE -'Z I I I I "ISLABCONTROLJOINTINFORMATION.I ::3:3:3 I zF-n-mW "-..n-w ..wm '-.. 4..06 BULLNOSE CMU ACCENT BLOCK.10.)FOR LOCATION OF FIRE EXTINGUISHERS o o o o o F.-n-.w n,.'I..-n..' REFER TO FIRE PROTECTION SHEETS.I "''--I ,'-7 I I 'f ...%4..07 SINGLE SCORED SPLIT FACE CMU.11.)PROVIDE (2)6"PIPE BOLLARDS AT I ,o,,o,I \ 5.01 METAL DOWNSPOUTS,PAINTED.GAS METER,IF REQUIRED.SEE SITE,'":;...\ 5.02 METAL GUTTER,PAINTED.STRUCTURAL,LoCATION.AND PLUMBING PLANS FOR T.O.FRAME "q I I I ,,>1 5.03 STEEL CANOPY (SEE SHEETS A-2.1,A-3.2,A-3.3ANDS-4.2),PAINTED.12.)ALL UNOBSTRUCTED PATHS SHALL •=,,!!i,tiliiiIIE,Tie.MASONRY 5.04 STEEL TUBE,PAINTED.ANDMEET ALL GUIDELINES FORACCESSIBILITYARETOBEPAINTEDOSHAYELLOW.-L -[],Zet:-11 'r-i --'1t'28'-8" 5.05 ROOF ACCESS LADDER,PAINTED (SEE SHEET A-7.0).13.)BRACE ALL STEEL STUDS ACCORDING TO .i ,I ....FENCE HEIGHT '-"'"--20'-0"(ABOVE SLAB)IV.o o FT v TO s o OTO F S S T CTUE T T*0 i5.07 FORKLIFT DAMAGE PREVENTION BARS-7'-O"L W/BO17"OM @ 9'-4"A.F.F.(SEE SHEET 14.)SEEFoR SPECSFENCES.&FOUNDATIONsPACEPOsTsDETAILSToAVOIDII I A-2.2).FOOTINGS WHERE POSSIBLE." 5.08 FORKLIFT DAMAGE PREVENTION BARS-16'-0"L W/BOTTOM @ 13'-6"A.F.F.(SEE 15.)NOAT CHAINGAPLARGERLINKFENCEs,THAN2"GATEs,ISPERMITTEDETc.____ll,, SHEET A-2.2).16.)MOUNT ALL SLIDING GATES ON OUTSIDE (,8...,,) 5.09 PROVIDE 4"PIPE BOLLARDS (SEE DETAIL 3/S-3.1)-NUMBER AND LOCATIONS PER OF ENCLOSURE "",,SOUTH ELE",,..,TION17.)EXT.CONTROL JOINTS SHOWN ON A-2IO. ARCHITECTURAL PLANS AND DOOR DETAILS 18.)ALL CMU HAVING EXTERIOR AND INTERIORII |SCALE"1"=20'-0"A-IO 5.10 PROVIDE 6"PIPE BOLLARDS (SEE DETAIL 3/S-3.1)-NUMBER AND LOCATIONS PER EXPOSURES,NOT GROUTED,SHOULD RECEIVE FOAM FILLED INSULATION. ARCHITECTURAL PLANS AND DOOR DETAILS 19.)AT CUSTOMER LOADING CANOPY AND 5.11 PROVIDE 6"PIPE BOLLARDS (SEE DETAIL 3/S-3.1)AT GAS METER.NUMBER AND GARDEN CENTER COVERED AREA,PAINT O'20'40'60' ALL EXPOSED METAL,STEEL AND METAL i' LOCATION PER PLUMBING PLANS.ROOF DECKING WHITE UNLESS SPECIFIED ).. 5.12 STEEL DOWNSPOUT COVER,PAINTED (SEE DETAIL 13/A-3.0)OTHERWISE.c_) 6.01 CART GUARD -P.T.2x10 STAINED LIGHT GRAY,MOUNTED 5"A.F.F.TO BOTTOM WITH z ,,'8 z I..n>- 1/2"¢,x4"EXP.BOLTS (COUNTERSUNK)@ 36"0.0..,,(b-l ,,..,,_((""Jf':n-'<0,.)0)) 6.02 TELEPHONE BOARD -4x8 SHEET PLYWOOD @ 4 A.F.F.WITH INTUMESCENT COATING ON FINISHES ['Ti ="S s" ALL SIDES PRIOR TO INSTALLATION (SEE SPECIFICATION SECTION 07812).J :::3 ,,,'8ATEDFANPF-1 SNOWDRIFT WHITE OR EQUAL (PRE FINISHED)z z FLusHT'01ACRYLIC FINISH SYSTEM,BY E.I.F.S.MANUFACTURER,ON SMOOTH FACED CMUWITHjoINTS.F-1 FACTORY BLACK VINYLCO_(CHAIN-LINKFABRIc)FABRIC)'PF-2 MANUFACTURERsLOWE'SMEDIUMGRAYsTANDARD(PRE-FINISHED)"WHITE-"o ,a..::3<<a"o I I'I °!o ]'4 !I 7.0.3 STANDING SEAM ARCHITECTURAL METAL ROOF PANEL.(SECURITY PF_3 I 7.04.PRE-FINISHE_D METAL COPING._P-1 LOWE SLIGHT,GRAYRAY(PAINT)PAINT PF 4.MANUFACTURERSEF_ILOWE'S LIGHT GRAySTANDARD(E.I.F.S.)GRAY l/--i-- 7.05 MEDALLION E.I.F.S.(SEE SHEETS A-2.1,A 3.1,A-3.2 AND A-3.3)P-2 LOWES MEDIUM G (){---7 'AY PAINT EF-2 LOWE'S MEDIUM GRAY (E.I.F.S.)7.06 CORNICE -E.I.F.S.WITH PRE-FINISHED METAL COPING (SEE SHEETS A-2.1,A-3.1, A 3.2 AND A-3.3)P-3 LOWE S DARK GR ()26'-0"[ 7.07 PRE-FINISHED METAL FASCIA.P-4.LOWE S RED ()/FENCE HEIGHT,,dL W 5.01 OVERHEAD DOOR.P-50SHA YELLOW (PAINT)EF-4.LOWE'S WHITE (E.I.F.S.)16'-0"A.F.F.\B.O.CANOPY 8.038"02 HOLLOW METAL DOOR AND FRAME TYPICAL,PAINTED.ALUMINUMSTOREFRONT.P-6 MANUFACTURERSSTANDARDBRIGHTWHITE(PAINT)EF-5 LOWE'S DARK GRAY (E.I.F.S.)__8B;2),I.LI 8.04 AUTO-SLIDER DOOR (SEE SHEET A-6.0).NA NATURAL ANODIZED (ALUM.)FINISH'F • FINISH),STEEL TUBE FRAME PAINTED.NOTE:SEE SPECIFICATIONS FOR APPROVED MANUFACTURERS.UNLESS SPECIFICALLY CALLED t B 8.059.01 IMPACTuNoBSTRUCTEDDOOR(FACTORYPATH,AS DIMENSIONED SHALL MEET ALL GUIDELINES FOR ACCESSIBIUTY OUT,CONTACT MANUFACTURER FOR LOWE'S NATIONAL ACCOUNT COLOR FORMULAS.PARK AV_NORTH 8 TO ,3,-PA,,,,TO O,,A Y,LOW NORTH EL !VATION,o,,WHT , 0,0 A OOx O"[.OW=S..W.,,.C ISECT.10530). O'20'40'60'I 1530 FARADAY AVE.,SUITE 140 I 1760.804.5300 (V)760.918.9112 (F)I , I THIS DRAWING 18 THE PROPERTY OF LOWE"8 HIW,INC.I I.(.I ANY USE OR REPRODUCTION IN WHOLE OR PART 18 |I PROHIBITED WITHOUT THE EXPRESSED WRITTEN | --=-cJ_L]/I I\1 I 1 I..............,II I[llltlllllllll]lttlltltillllp itllllill illlllllltli lllllilllltlllllllllllllllliliWj]_.fr/!T.,.,""llll[llllllllllllllllllllilttllllll N IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIItlIIIIIIIIIIIII"IIItlttlIIII!N 1I [i FENCE HEIGHT 1 1'-3' .0-o (;ARDEN AVENiJ 2 FLFVATIONSCALE:1"=20'-0"A-10 A O'20'40'60' n"r., O ,r ._z z'-s ,o Z 0 5)__z , I I O OI_1 n.-Z t-o ""oIIIozI°I °°°:0 "1-- /0 r.J I.,,.I,,J z7 Iol UJ gz"-;;T.O.T.O.M LI,,.& -t-_. -.1 I 7",o,<>1 w=11.KI I I il P,i o[,,,................__•• CRITERIA ISSUE DATE:03.01.05FINISHPERMITSET ISSUE DATE: CONSTRUCTION SETEASTELEV/,,TION ISSUE DATE: DRAWING NUMBER: 1 "=20'-0' SCALE:A-IO 2 003.01.05 •102kO-A-20 O'20'40'60'LP¢OE J EEL04LO4Y GD00o4 Ob (--75--3 O '0 <j00o0 < d3><C (-(D'0 L_E (_9/cOLLJ 0_J/Z©t--Z b_JcF/(-0 EDC.iC-03o / F4 LAKE WASHINGTON TON zMUNICIPAL AIRPORT Z 1.1.1>< N 6TH ST 4 Z N 8TH ST SUNSET B[ N 4TH ST NE 4TH ST ® GARD N AVENUE N.AND N.PARK STRE R NTON,WASHINGTON PORTION OF"NW 1/4,N 1/4,SECTION 08,T.23 N.,R.5 E.,W.M. VICINITY MAP PROPERTY INFORMATION DRAWING INDEX CONSULTANTS NTS UTILITIES GOVERNING AGENCIES RECORD LEGAL DESCRIPTiOI'J:PARCEL NO.082305 9217 O0 PER CHICAGO TITLE INSU',NCE CO.ORDER NO.1167057,DATED SHEET NO.DRAWING TITLE AUGUST 11th,2005 AT 8:C)A.M.CVR COVER SHEET CITY OF RENTON PUBLIC WORKS CIVIL:STORMWATER/SEWER/WATER:1055 S.GRADY WAY THAT PORTION OF THE NOFTHWEST QUARTER AND THE NORTHEAST QUARTER PC-I.0 PRELIMINARY SITE PLAN PACLAND CITY OF RENTON PUBLIC WORKS RENTON,WA 98055 OF SECTION 8,TOWNSHIF z3 NORTH,RANGE 5 EAST,WlLLAMETTE MERIDIAN,PC-I.1 PRELIMINARY SITE PLAN NOTES AND DETAILS 11235 SE 6TH ST,SUITE 220 1055 S.GRADY WAY (425)430-7270 IN KING COUNTY,WASHINGfON,DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS:PC-2.0 PRELIMINARY GRADING AND DRAINAGE PLAN BELLEVUE,WA.98004 RENTON,WA 98055 CONTACT:MICHAEL DOTSON PC-2.1 PRELIMINARY GRADING AND DRAINAGE NOTES (425)453-9501 (425)430-7234 BEGINNING AT THE INTERSECTION OF THE SOUTH LINE OF SAID NORTHWEST PC-3.0 PRELIMINARY COMPOSITE UTILITY PLAN CONTACT:BILL FORTUNATO,P.E.CONTACT:MICHAEL DOTSON CITY OF RENTON DEVELOPMENT SERVICES QUARTER WITH THE EASIERLY MARGIN OF GARDEN AVENUE NORTH,AS1055S.GRADY WAY CONVEYED TO THE CITY 9F RENTON BY DEED RECORDED UNDER RECORDING PC-5.1 PRELIMINARY UTILITY NOTES PAUL MANZER,P.E.ELECTRIC:RENTON,WA 98055 NUMBER 5535459;PL-I.0 PRELIMINARY LANDSCAPE PLAN 425 430-7270 THENCE SOUTH 89"28'22"E AST ALONG SAID SOUTH LINE 603.26 FEET TO ASURVEYOR:PUGET SOUND ENERGY CONTACT:LESLEY NISHIHARA MONUMENT IN CASE HELD S THE CENTER OF SAID SECTION; PACE,INC.8001 S.212STKENT,WA 98032 OWNER THENCE SOUTH 89"30'10"E ,ST 35.59 FEET TO A POINT ON THE WESTERLY 1601 SECOND AVE,SUITE 1000 (253)395-7030 MARGIN OF THE PACIFIC CC ,ST RAILROAD CO.RIGHT OF WAY,SAID POINT DATUM SEATTLE,WA 98101 BEING UPON A CURVE Tq)"--IE RIGHT,FROM WHICH THE CENTER BEARS(206)441-1855 CONTACT:LEANN KEYES LOWE'S HIW,INC.915 118TH AVE SE,SUITE 300 NORTH 52"20'38"EAST,31(.39 FEET;THENCE NORTHERLY ALONG SAID CONTACT:FRED WlLLIAMSON NATURAL GAS CARLSBAD,CA 92008 MARGIN AN ARC LENGTH OI 277.62 FEET TO THE POINT OF TANGENCY;HORIZONTAL DATUM:MAD 83/91.BASED ON GPSMEASUREMENTSFROMCITYOFRENTONMONUMENTSPUGETSOUNDENERGY(760)804-5300 THENCE NORTH 18"01'40"WEST ALONG SAID WESTERLY MARGIN 1,995.11 FEET #3736 (E 1/4 CORNER 8-23-5)&:RENT1847.GEOTECHNICAL/ENVlRONMENTAL:8001 S.212ST CONTACT:JIM MANION TO AN INTERSECTION W,lH THE SOUTHERLY MARGIN OF THE WASHINGTON GEOENGINEERS KENT,WA 98032 STATE HIGHWAY (PSH-1)NORTH RENTON INTERCHANGE A-LINE RIGHT OF 8410 154TH AVENUE,NE (253)395-7030 ARCHITECT WAY;BASIS OF BEARINGS =S 89"28'22"E ON THENCE SOUTH 49"05'06"EST ALONG SAID SOUTHERLY MARGIN 406.82 MONUMENTED SOUTH LINE OF NW 1/4 SECTIONREDMOND,WA 98052 CONTACT:LEANN KEYES SSOE,INC.FEET;8-23-5. (425)861-6000 TELEPHONE 22121 17TH AVE.SE,SUITE 225 THENCE SOUTH 31"53'55"V-_-ST ALONG SAID SOUTHERLY MARGIN 62.78 FEET; CONTACT:SHAUN STAUFFER BOTHELL,WA 98021 ""EAST 47.07 FEET TO A POINT ON THE EASTERLYDAVIDCOOKQWESTCOMMUNICATIONSTHENCESOUTH08"39'1s VERTICAL DATUM:NAVD 88 PER CITY OF RENTON 23315 66TH AVE S.(425)827-2950 MARGIN OF SAID GARDEN /VENUE NORTH;CONTROL POINT NO.RENT1935;CHISELED SQUARE INCONCRETEBASEOFTRAFFICSIGNALATNORTHWESTKENT,WA 98032 CONTACT:CHRIS O'CONNOR,PE THENCTE0 SOUTH 18"00"30'E ,ST ALONG SAID EASTERLY MARGIN 1,289.97 CORNER OF INTERSECTION OF LAKE WASHINGTON LANDSCAPING:(206)345-4475 SITE DATA FEET THE POINT OF 3UIRVATURE OF A CURVE TO THE RIGHT HAVING APACLANDCONTACT:BOB STEEN RADIUS AONF 910.00 FEET;TI IENCE ALONG SAID MARGIN CURVING TO THE BLVD.N.AND PARK AVE.N.ELEVATION =30.431 1144 EASTLAKE AVE.E.,SUITE 601 +930,875 SQ.FT.(+21.37 ACRES)NOTE THIS AREA RIGHT,ARC LENGTH 9 293.83 FEET TO THE POINT OF TANGENCY, SEATTLE,WA.98109 IS FOR ALL OF TAX LOT 082305-9217.THE SURVEY THENCE SOUTH 00"29'31"Fv --ST ALONG SAID EASTERLY MARGIN 253.42 FEET (206)522-9510 AREA COVERS ONLY THE NORTHERLY PORTION OF TO THE TRUE POINT OF B ;INNING. CONTACT:SHAWN PARSONS,R.L.A.THIS SITE. NOTES: SURVEY LEGEND 1 SITE WORK FOR THIS PROJECT SHALL MEET OR EXCEED THE PROJECT SPECIFICATIONS, THE 2002 WASHINGTON STATE DEPT.OF TRANSPORTATION STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS FOR ROAD,BRIDGE AND MUNICIPAL CONSTRUCTION,AND THE A.P.W.A.STANDARDS ,WATER VALVE:........CENTER LINES WHICH ARE HEREBY REFERENCED AS PART OF THESE PLANS. FIRE HYDRANT RIGHT-OF-WAY LINESPROPERTYLINES 2.THE DESIGN SHOWN IS BASED UPON THE ENGINEER'S UNDERSTANDING OF THE EXISTING CONDITIONS.THE PLAN DOES NOT REPRESENT A DETAILED FIELD SURVEY.THE WATER METER FLOW LINE EXISTING CONDITIONS SHOWN ON THIS PLAN SHEET ARE BASED UPON THE SURVEY :'i,':i:MANHOLES (SS/SD)WATER LINE PREPARED BY BARGHAUSEN CONSULTING ENGINEERS,DATED 10-29-02,REVISED CB ...................:......SANITARY SEWER LINE 0,3-12-05 BY PACE.THE CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR VERIFYING FIELDPOWER/UTILITY POLE GUY ANCHOR POWER TRANSFORMER POWER/TRAFFIC SIGNAL HAND PEDESTRIAN CROSSING LIGHT TRAFFIC SIGNAL LIGHT STREET LIGHT SPOT ELEVATION SIGN SET BENCHMARK RIGHT OF WAY LINE HOLE ..,.. STORM DRAIN LINE GAS LINE UNDERGROUND UNDERGROUND UNDERGROUND UNDERGROUND CHAIN LINK FENCE POWER LINES TELEPHONE LINES POWER/TELEPHONE LINES FIBER OPTIC LINES CONDITIONS ARE DISCOVERED,THE CONTRACTOR SHALL OF ANY PORTION OF THE SITEWORK WHICH NOT ACCEPT EXISTING SURVEY,INCLUDING WITHOUT SURVEY PRIOR TO BIDDING THE PROPOSED SITEWORK IMPROVEMENTS.IF CONFLICTS NOTIFY THE OWNER PRIOR TO INSTALLATION WOULD BE AFFECTED.IF CONTRACTOR DOES TOPOGRAPHY AS SHOWN ON THE PLANS, EXCEPTION,HE SHALL HAVE MADE,AT HIS OWN EXPENSE,A TOPOGRAPHIC BY A REGISTERED LAND SURVEYOR AND SUBMIT IT TO THE OWNER FOR REVIEW. .CAUTION -NOTICE TO CONTRACTOR THE CONTRACTOR IS SPECIFICALLY CAUTIONED THAT THE LOCATION OF EXISTING UTILITIES AS SHOWN ON THESE PLANS IS BASED ON RECORDS OF THE VARIOUS UTILITY COMPANIES AND,WHERE POSSIBLE,MEASUREMENTS TAKEN EXACT U TI LI TY EXACT IN THE FIELD.THE INFORMATION OR COMPLETE.THE CONTRACTOR COMPANY AT LEAST 48 HOURS FIELD LOCATION OF UTILITIES.IT THE THE IS NOT TO BE RELIED ON AS BEING MUST CALL THE APPROPRIATE BEFORE ANY EXCAVATION TO REQUEST SHALL BE THE RESPONSIBILITY OF CONTRACTOR TO RELOCATE ALL EXISTING UTILITIES WHICH CONFLICT WITH PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS SHOWN ON THESE PLANS. 11235 SE 6th Street Suite 220 Bellevue,Washington 98004 T (425)453-9501 F (425)453-8208 WA/.PACLAND.COM RE, 41146 I zxPmzS 12/25/I REVISIONS 2 1 NO. e SEPA RESUBMITTAL SEPA SUBMITTAL DESCRIPTION 6/19/06 01/31/06 DATE I DATE I DESCRIPTION 6/19/06 <;SEPA RESUBMITTAL 1/31/06 <SEPA SUBMITTAL 0 DEEP MODIFIED m o0 mmooommoommmZ S-S-- jl L" ,I '::i ;.-•:,.o.r ,,-i::.[,..,)E I .4.,i ;.?;:'-.'!:/";U5 ti .,,,[,'14 TM ....'FRY'S .... .-••I LOWE'S HIW,mNC.I -11530 FARADAY AVE.,SUITE 14oIICARLSBAD,CA 92008 I 1760.804.5300 (V)760.918.9112 (F)I •.•-LI]:i''I-'!i:i!,!i !i ""'I THIS DRAWING IS THE PROPERTY OF LOWE S HOME I._,.-..,"I CENTERS,INC,ANY USE OR REPRODUCTION IN ImWHOLEORPARTISPROHIBITEDWITHOUTTHEmmEXPRESSEDWRITTENCONSENTOFLOWESHOMEI .".TL"! BIt.....-,,.,.,Z I ''....#''""'"r "J PLANER sTr, AL0,o'.. BDEN.............AVENUE N 'BY OTHERS ....GARDEN AVENUE ""::,.:"=....'-L ::",.......-,:,,:.,,....................................,.,:: """--FRONTAOE ...................--.......,,,.........''.........................I.............'....""..-'......'-,"----.......................................................'............,':',i.. -.t ,,............• LEGEND lo l STD.DUTY PAVEMENT HEAVY DUTY CONCREE CURB ()NUMBER OF PARKING STALLS PER ROW I 4 I CONCREE PAVEMENT -x---x-CHAIN LINK FENCE Acreage." Tota/9.8O Developed 9.80 Main Bu//d/ng." 8a/es F/oor 102,869 8.F. Of#ce Area 3,911 S.F. Rece/v/'ng/Storage 18,29 i S.F. Util/ty Rooms 1,333 S.F. Vestibu/es."2,938 S.F. MAIN BU/LD/NG TOTAL 129,342 S.F. Garden Center." Shade 8tructures 5,810 8.F. Covered Area 9,032 S.F. Park/n ,Keouirements." Lowe's Parking I '?u/red" 8EL SHEET PC-I.1 F:C)F GENERAL 81TE PL I OTES # C3W18W 8tandard 566 Handicapped 12 Total Parking ,e(Tuired 578 L oca/Parking Required ',Standard 502 8 Handicapped ,3 -J 11 I--0 o TotalParkingRequ/red 516 ]"A:)'tIC SC LP,0 O Z I--Z.Ratio=50 MA)((spaces/OOO st)-- Park Provided."Standard 401 I (m FEET )••ORIGINAL 01/31/06Handicapped10tneh=40 ft.ISSUE DATE: Total Parking Provided 411 I I PAVEMENT PER ]CART CORRAL Open Area 11,380 S.F.Ratio =3.18 (spaces/iO00 st)Based on Gross Building S.F.I I ARCH.PLANS (FURNISHED AND INSTALLED BY LOWE'S)Garden Center Total 26,222S.F. LIMITS OF DISTuRBANCE ®BOLLARD "" PERMIT SET ISSUE DATE: COsNSJL I?TION SET D-N--0--E--E: PC 1.,:) E ¢33 (-.000O'4 og c-- (_9 r- od0 0 ._JZrJco (-- C) O-4JZ >< c-'-(1) C_9Jco L.LJ 0 _JJ Z0t---Z1,1 Jc-O ..t_a c- c-f,o J dd NOTES REVISIObl,€; :,<..PRE-BID sLT /POST BID SET/ISSUE DA1E ISSUE DATE 2 ,'"DATE DESCRIPTION .r ¸ CITY/COUNTY """'''"1 ALL WORK AND MATERIALS SHALL COMPLY WiTH ALL "'....' "":.-.".---:':'.::':--"'"6/19106 <SEPA RESUBMITTALREGULATIONSANDCODESANDO.S.H.A.STANDARDS...................-.....:./.,.,.........':"'""''•":'"'""''"1/31/06 SEPA SUBMITTAL2.THE DESIGN SHOWN IS BASED UPON THE ENGINEER'S UNDERSTANDING -:.".,.:.'"/;-'"...- OF THE EXISTING CONDITIONS.THIS PLAN DOES NOT REPRESENT A :..-..;",,.,.......,...DETAILED FIELD SURVEY.THE EXISTING CONDITIONS SHOWN ON THIS ......;:":""::"':;;"'""""';' PLAN SHEET ARE BASED UPON SURVEY PREPARED BY PACE,INC.,.....,.:.-,,,..,......DATED OCTOBER 14,2005.THE CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR "......": VERIFYING FIELD CONDITIONS PRIOR TO BIDDING THE PROPOSED .....'....'...:,.'.---.-..,;::,' SITEWORK IMPROVEMENTS.IF CONFLICTS ARE DISCOVERED,THE -""......-,s ......,=,,-- CONTRACTOR SHALL NOTIFY THE OWNER PRIOR TO INSTALLATION OF ..-.-./- ANY PORTION OF THE SITEWORK WHICH WOULD BE AFFECTED.IF -..--;..".....': CONTRACTOR DOES NOT ACCEPT EXISTING SURVEY,INCLUDING .'.'.-:......-.,...i _.'.;..,,.._ TOPOGRAPHY AS SHOWN ON THE PLANS,WiTHOUT EXCEPTION,HE ;'-......;• SHALL HAVE MADE,AT HIS OWN EXPENSE,A TOPOGRAPHIC SURVEY ;;'./i .......' BY A REGISTERED LAND SURVEYOR AND SUBMIT IT TO THE OWNER -.!,. FOR REVIEW.r ....i:'::: 3.CAUTION --NOTICE TO CONTRACTOR ,:EXISTING CONCRETETHECONTRACTORISSPECIFICALLYCAUTIONEDTHATTHELOCATION:....... AND/OR ELEVATION OF EXISTING UTILITIES AS SHOWN ON THESE "--------:/PROPOSED HEAVY DUTY PAVEMENT PLANS IS BASED ON RECORDS OF THE VARIOUS UTILITIES,AND .;...,.::....-..L-.•"..,.......•..-. "REQUIRED PRIVATE CROSSINGS PERMIT FROM BNSF ••WHERE POSSIBLE,MEASUREMENTS TAKEN IN THE FIELD.THE .',. INFORMATION IS NOT TO BE RELIED ON AS BEING EXACT OR ""':"::...."......."":\""'""",:''"":'EXISTINGCURB ....""""""-..TIE::INTO ='"COMPLETE.THE CONTRACTOR MUST CALL THE APPROPRIATE UTILITY .."''•-.....•="'-'...."........'LI3 I.t3 ._COMPANY AT LEAST 48 HOURS BEFORE ANY EXCAVATION TO '-.:'.:..'- REQUEST EXACT FIELD LOCATION OF UTILITIES.IT SHALL BE THE ::..... RESPONSIBILITY OF THE CONTRACTOR TO RELOCATE ALL EXISTING :......:......"'"'"i I--u- .....................FI .......'........."._RIGHT IN • -.:...............--:;,G T OUTPROPOSEDIMPROVEMENTSONTHEPLANS.:..:..... 4.CONTRACTOR SHALL REFER TO ARCHITECTURAL PLANS FOR EXACT .....'.'""-'.-..........i...-......:!/.i...._•-..".'.:.........LOCATION AND DIMENSIONS OF VESTIBULE,SLOPED PAVING,EXIT '...."'......'.''"'"PORCHES,SIDEWALKS,RAMPS &TRUCK DOCKS,PRECISE BUILDING '''''";'""''''I I '"'"':''t I "....''r'"I ......I ....'--I ""'[t ,0 DIMENSIONS AND EXACT BUILDING UTILITY ENTRANCE LOCATIONS.•.........'"•'....."'.........................":....• 5.DIMENSIONS SHOWN REFER TO FACE OF CURB,FACE OF BUILDING OR ,""\,i"'"'-.,'::::;L.::"-,,,':"i """"'":i ":",.1 i ..":""- TO THE CENTERLINE OF PAVEMENT STRIPING,UNLESS OTHERWISE .•.-:.L:,:•.[.i....-"/"•:';""":."-'-".,-,' "',:'I I,'"u c 6.ALL PAVED PARKING LOT AREAS WITHIN THE LIMITS OF ....:......•ck\..,,.%.;_.....,.;.!...,IMPROVEMENTS SHALL BE STANDARD DUTY PAVEMENT UNLESS "...'-:.'":.•:"::"_:...-D ":;"-/.";";-:-"•,•OTHERWISE NOTED,-""",.....",;,.,.":%:-,7 -.....,,,-,---i';:-.---..."-/.....•.,cb/",',x Z""-I LOWE S HIW,INC.I "b """......b ......."':•I k '/•......":::'....•1 1530 FARADAY AVE"SUITE14017.CONTRACTOR SHALL PROVIDE A TEMPORARY TRAFFIC CONTROL PLAN ... FOR THE CITY ENGINEER'S APPROVAL PRIOR TO ANY WORK WITHIN -:i ..,!;[:.,.-"1760.804.5300 (v)760.918.9112(F)1 THE CITY RIGHT-OF-WAY,"'"•-""""•',.,.".:'"'r""'';:"""\'..'-'.'\,"'-.D:I THIS DRAWING IS THE PROPERTY OF LOWE'S HOME I8.FIRE LANE STRIPING AROUND BUILDING PERIMETER AND ALONG FIRE IC"TRS,'"C.AOSO"RPRODUCT'O"'"I|WHOLE OR PART IS PROHIBITED WITHOUT THE |TRUCK ACCESS WAYS SHALL BE INSTALLED AS PART OF THIS IEXPRE$$EDWRITTENCONSENTOFLOWESHOMEIICENTERS,INC.COPYRIGHT 2001 ALL RIGHTS RESERVED IHOUSER CCE D T ,L @ ••CONTRACT,IN ACCORDANCE WiTH THE LOCAL CODE AND FIRE , MARSHALL REQUIREMENTS." 9.REFER TO BOUNDARY SURVEY FOR LEGAL DESCRIPTION,DIMENSIONS SCALE: OF PROPERTY LINES,BASIS OF BEARINGS &BENCHMARK INFORMATION.(SEE SHEET CS-1) 10.SEE SHEET C-1.1 FOR SITE DIMENSIONS./ 11.ALL ON-SITE PAINTED STRIPING SHALL BE DOUBLE COATED.(FIRE LANE STRIPING SEPARATE COATS SHALL BE APPLIED NO SOONER THAN 4 HOURS /(TYP) APART.(CONTRACTOR TO REFER TO PROJECT SPECIFICATIONS FOR ADDITIONAL PAVING MARKING REQUIREMENTS.)\---"---'--'-----'--'---"-'"'--r"'----'-"--"---------:- 12.PARKING LOT STRIPING SHALL BE YELLOW,4"WiDTH,&DOUBLE ..........,,, L ......L 110'lRUCK i 'tCOATED,UNLESS OTHERWiSE NOTED.LIGHT POLE BASES TO BE .....,.o PAINTED TRAFFIC YELLOW (DOUBLE COAT)I .............r ......'\i,1 13.ALL DISTURBED AREAS ARE TO RECEIVE FOUR INCHES OF TOPSOIL,r ......,,,; SEED,MULCH AND WATER UNTIL A HEALTHY STAND OF GRASS IS \I B "--_....J •,-• ESTABLISHED.,''---,#0 0 0 0 i S14.ALL ISLANDS WiTH CURB AND GUTTER SHALL BE LANDSCAPED.THOSE ",( ','IIIISLANDSARETOHAVE18"CURB AND GUTTER.ALL REMAINING ,,=,, ISLANDS ARE TO BE STRIPED AS SHOWN.,,,,,,,'I , 15.EXISTING STRUCTURES WiTHIN CONSTRUCTION LIMITS ARE TO BE \i - ABANDONED,REMOVED OR RELOCATED AS NECESSARY.ALL COST "'-,,<: IS AU O ,NC UO O.N ,[]-II U U PN-0 0 ..''1 t)t ):i i. 16.CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR ALL RELOCATIONS,[FIRE LANE STRI G I--',NC.U0,N0 .T NOT., , O TO,A..ORA.NAOE,- ,.o ;SIGNS,TRAFFIC SIGNALS &POLES,ETC.AS REQUIRED.ALL WORK (TYP) SHALL BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH GOVERNING AUTHORITIES "\,_____'i SPECIFICATIONS AND SHALL BE APPROVED BY SUCH.ALL COST ",'L\SHALL BE ,NCLuDED ,N BASE B,D.._\,n I--1 n ll 17.PYLON SIGNS SHALL BE CONSTRUCTED BY OTHERS.THE CONTRACTOR -.:__.........._L_....-_....___ SHALL INSTALL CONDUIT AND ELECTRICAL CIRCUIT BETWEEN THE -I 0 0 i IIZI ! PYLON SIGN(S)AND THE LIGHTING PANEL.I _.I IF'I 18.THE SITEWORK CONTRACTOR SHALL CONNECT ALL LIGHTS WITHIN THE •,• ORIGINAL 01/31/06RETAILSTORE'S DEMISED AREA TO THE SECURITY CIRCUIT AS SHOWN LANES SHALL BE IDENTIFIED BY A FOUR INCH (4")WIDE LINE AND CURB PAINTED BRIGHT RED.THE SSUE DATE: ON THE ELECTRICAL PLAN.BLOCK LETTERS SHALL STATE,"FIRE LANE -NO PARKING",BE EIGHTEEN INCHES (18")HIGH,PERMIT SET 19.CURB RADII ADJACENT TO PARKING STALLS SHALL BE 2'.ALL OTHER PAINTED WHITE,LOCATED NOT LESS THAN ONE FOOT (1')FROM THE CURB FACE,AT FIFTY FOOT mSUE DATE: CURB RADII SHALL BE 10',UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED.(50')INTERVALS.CONSTRUCTIONSETIssUEDATE: DRAWING NUMBER:FIRE LANE STRIF NG SCALE:1"=100'PC--1 .1 00 ++ +SHI:::I::::I PC-2.1 <, LEGEND STORM DRAINA(.E PLAN NOTES CO.TOU C0.T0U T0 0,CU+TC mm SPOT ELEVATION TOP OF PAVEMENT TP >-''t •HIGH POINT HP -"0TYPEICATCHBASINF-- TYPE II CATCH BASlh LOW POINT LP 03 ?TOP OF WALL ",,o _mnJmz CLEANOUT TO GRADE*=o__n O.T.G.)-PROPOSED GRADE AT BW II I --ORIGINAL FACE OF WALL (]],i PP..'l')ISSUE DATE:01/31/06 STORM DRAIN PIPE OD 1 Ln¢6 =40 it.PERMIT SET ROOF STORM DRAIN PIPE RD WATER QUALITY ISSUE DATE:CONSTRUCTION SET ISSUE DATE: LIMITS OF GRADING DRAWING NUMBER: o.s,u,o,,c F'O-2.0 E O0 CJ Ob 00CJ o c- E3 0C 0 __JZ /co c- *-- O £2bC'-J/ Z <C C /0) LLJ 0 __J/Z0F--ZL,IQ/c-O c-°c-co / r . . . . . 4 GRADING NOTES STORM DRAINAGE NOTES ENGINEER'S UNDERSTANDING OF THE EXISTING I.THE DESIGN SHOWN IS BASED UPON THE CONDITIONS.THE PLAN DOES NOT REPRESENT A DETAILED FIELD SURVEY.THE EXISTING CONDITIONS SHOWN ON THIS PLAN SHEET ARE BASED UPON THE SURVEY PREPARED BY PACE,INC.,DATED OCTOBER 14,2005.THE CONTRACTOR IS 2.IF ANY EXISTING STRUCTURES TO REMAIN ARE DAMAGED DURING CONSTRUCTION IT RESPONSIBLE FOR VERIFYING FIELD CONDITIONS PRIOR TO BIDDING THE PROPOSED SHALL BE THE CONTRACTORS RESPONSIBILITY TO REPAIR AND/OR REPLACE THE SITEWORK MPROVEMENTS.IF CONFLICTS ARE DISCOVERED,THE CONTRACTOR SHALL EXISTING STRUCTURE AS NECESSARY TO RETURN IT TO EXISTING CONDITIONS OR NOTIFY THE OWNER PRIOR TO INSTALLATION OF ANY PORTION OF THE SITEWORK WHICH BETTER. WOULD BE AFFECTED.IF CONTRACTOR DOES NOT ACCEPT EXISTING SURVEY,INCLUDING TOPOGRAPHY AS SHOWN ON THE PLANS,WITHOUT EXCEPTION,HE SHALL HAVE MADE,3.STORM DRAINAGE PIPE WITH LESS THAN 2'-0"COVER SHALL BE CLASS IV REINFORCED AT HIS OWN EXPENSE,A TOPOGRAPHIC SURVEY BY A REGISTERED LAND SURVEYOR CONCRETE PIPE,OR APPROVED EQUAL TO SUSTAIN H-20 LOADING. AND SUBMIT IT TO THE OWNER FOR REVIEW. 5 6. REVISIOIk '°.I ,,.) PRE-BID S#r POST BID SET ISSUE DATr A ISSUE DATE DATE DESCRIPTION EXISTING DRAINAGE STRUCTURES TO BE INSPECTED AND REPAIRED AS NEEDED,AND 6/19/06 <SEPARESUBMITTAL EXISTING PIPES TO BE CLEANED OUT TO REMOVE ALL SILT AND DEBRIS.J/31/06 <SEPASUBMITTAL ALL ONSITE STORM DRAINAGE PIPE SHALL BE SMOOTH WALLED INTERIOR, MANUFACTURER'S VERIFICATION OF MANNING'S ROUGHNESS COEFFICIENT N=0.012 LESS. OR PRECAST STRUCTURES MAY BE USED AT CONTRACTOR'S OPTION. CAUTION -NOTICE TO CONTRACTOR THE CONTRACTOR IS SPECIFICALLY CAUTIONED AT THE LOCATION AND/OR ELEVATION OF EXISTING UTILITIES AS SHOWN ON THESE PLANS IS BASED ON RECORDS OF THE VARIOUS UTILITY COMPANIES AND,WHERE POSSIBLE,MEASUREMENTS TAKEN IN THE FIELD.THE INFORMATION IS NOT BE RELIED ON AS BEING EXACT OR COMPLETE.THE CONTRACTOR MUST CALL THE APPROPRIATE UTILITY COMPANY AT LEAST 48 HOURS BEFORE ANY EXCAVATION TO REQUEST EXACT FIELD LOCATION OF UTILITIES.IT SHALL BE THE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE CONTRACTOR TO RELOCATE ALL EXISTING UTIUTIES WHICH CONFLICT WITH THE PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS SHOWN ON THESE PLANS. ALL CATCH BASINS AND EDGE OF GRATE FRAME APPLICABLE). AREA DRAINS ARE TO BE SITUATED SUCH THAT THE OUTSIDE IS AT TOE OF CURB OR FLOWLINE OF GUTTER (WHERE 7.CATCH BASIN INLET PROTECTION /EROSION CONTROL TO BE USED FOR ALL NEW INLETS. THE SPOT ELEVATIONS INDICATED ON THIS PLAN REPRESENT THE DESIGN TOP OFPAVEMENT,UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED.8.ALL STORM PIPE ENTERING STRUCTURES SHALL BE GROUTED TO ASSURE CONNECTION AT STRUCTURE IS WATERTIGHT. CONTRACTOR REMOVAL OF REMOVED TO IS RESPONSIBLE FOR DEMOLITION OF EXISTING STRUCTURES INCLUDING ANY EXISTING UTILITIES SERVING THE STRUCTURE.UTILITIES ARE TO BE THE RIGHT-OF-WAY. e ALL STORM SEWER MANHOLES IN PAVED AREAS SHALL BE FLUSH WITH PAVEMENT, AND SHALL HAVE TRAFFIC BEARING RING AND COVERS.MANHOLES IN UNPAVED AREAS SHALL BE 6"ABOVE FINISH GRADE.LIDS SHALL BE LABELED "STORM SEWER". ALL UNSURFACED AREAS DISTURBED BY GRADING OPERATION SHALL RECEIVE 4 INCHES OF TOPSOIL.CONTRACTOR SHALL APPLY STABILIZATION FABRIC TO ALL SLOPES 3H.IV OR STEEPER.CONTRACTOR SHALL STABILIZE DISTURBED AREAS WITH GRASS IN 10.ALL STORM STRUCTURES SHALL HAVE A SMOOTH UNIFORM POURED MORTAR INVERT ACCORDANCE WITH LOCAL SPECIFICATION UNTIL A HEALTHY STAND OF GRASS IS FROM INVERT IN TO INVERT OUT,UNLESS OTHERWISE SHOWN IN THE CATCH BASIN OBTAINED.DETAIL. ALL CUT AND FILL SLOPES SHALL BE CONSTRUCTED PER THE UBC CODE AND 11.CONTRACTOR SHALL CONNECT ROOF DRAIN LEADERS TO PROPOSED STORM DRAINS AS APPLICABLE LOCAL REGULATION.ALL CUT AND FILL SLOPES SHALL BE 3:1 OR SHOWN. FLATTER UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. l'M U i,¢!z NI'M . . 1, 10. 11. CONTRACTOR SHALL ASSURE NATURAL AND PAVED AREAS OF WATER. POSITIVE DRAINAGE AWAY FROM BUILDINGS FOR ALL AND SHALL GRADE ALL AREAS TO PRECLUDE PONDING ALL POLLUTANTS OTHER THAN SEDIMENT ON-SITE DURING CONSTRUCTION SHALL BE HANDLED AND DISPOSED OF IN A MANNER THAT DOES NOT CAUSE CONTAMINATION OF STORMWATER.THE CONTRACTOR SHALL ADHERE TO ALL TERMS AND CONDITIONS AS OUTLINED IN THE GENERAL N.P.D.E.S.PERMIT FOR STORMWATER DISCHARGE ASSOCIATED WITH CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES. PROPERTIES AND WATERWAYS DOWNSTREAM OF THE SITE SHALL BE PROTECTED FROM EROSION DUE TO INCREASES IN THE VOLUME,VELOCITY AND PEAK FLOW RATE OF STORMWATER RUNOFF FROM PROJECT SITE. SHALL COMPLY WITH ALL APPLICABLE GOVERNING CODES AND BECONSTRUCTION CONSTRUCTED TO SAME. CONTRACTOR TO REMOVE UNSUITABLE LINE OF THE FOOTINGS. SOILS LOCATED WITHIN THE BUILDINGS SPLAY FOR BOUNDARY AND TOPOGRAPHIC INFORMATION REFER TO PROJECT SURVEY. FOR LAYOUT INFORMATION REFER TO THE SITE PLAN AND HORIZONTAL CONTROL PLAN. i 0' •5 N.,,.-.i ,f')mrs, I LOWE S HIW,INC.II53oFARADAYAVE.,SUITE 4o IICARLSBAD,CA e200S I1760,804.5300 (V)760.918.9112 (F)I THIS DRAWING IS THE PROPERTY OF LOWE'S HOMEI CENTERS,INC.ANY USE OR REPRODUCTION IN I WHOLE OR PART IS PROHIBITED WITHOUT THE I EXPRESSED WRITTEN CONSENT OF LOWE S HOME I CENTERS,INC.COPYRIGHT 2001 ALL RIGHTS RESERVED I 03LU I--O ORIGINAL ISSUE DATE:01/31/06 PERMIT SET ISSUE DATE: CONSTRUC]'ION SET ISSUE DATE: DRAWING NUMBER: PC-2.1 E 000 00 c 0 o __JZrY/co ¢- CD /Z (3.)>< c- / W o /Zop--Z rY/c0 c-o_c- O / WIDTH.PROPOSED CITY/'SS MAIN"--'BDEN AVI=NUI-:"""----H----'r"N"....."rM""L "'4"....'::......--""01"RENTON UTILITY :.......................•.........................................' •"'"'/.i:::t •......"'GAS LINL"-'-.::" 'T T:/-:....:'CONNECT 0 EXIS +:12"L --++"r WATERMAIN W SADI)L-TEE :::WATERMAIN W/SADDLE TEE /:"""TYP•/ SEE SHI-I-I PC-3.1 " FOR GENERAL UTILITY PLAN NOTES LEGEND NOTE:_z 12"WATERMAIN SANITARY SEWER MAIN SS THE LAR WATER FLOW STUDY IS NOT COMPLETED AS OF 6/16/D6.THE 40%SUBMITTAL DESIGN IS ,(i Z tJ j BASED ON PRELIMINARY DISCUSSIONS WITH SCHIRMER ENGINEERING CORPORATION AND IS SUBJECT TO . GRAPHIC ',CALETHRUSTBLOCK"SS CLEANOUT TO GRADE .1 t tW REDUCER -(;AS LINE G ,0 °""='I--8 ORIGINALDOUBLECHECKGASMETER®t m =o tBACKFLOWPREVENTOR nSSUE DATE:01/31/06PERMITSET TELEPHONE T CA /r{OU ISSUE DATE:CONSTRUCTION SET WATER METER I BEFORE '()U DIG !ISSUEDATE: PC-3.0 dd • E0O0r.O (...0£E)0Cxl c-- (_9 r--, 0r'O Q Z£t//-co c-"°_ r--, /Z q.)::> E(1.)-0 /cr) i,i o__J/ZoI---Z I,I /c-O c-o_c-C") / GENERAL UTILITY NOTES SANITARY SEWER NOTES WATER NOTES FIBER OPTIC NOTES II IIIII •ALL IMPROVEMENTS SHALL MEET LOCAL,STATE DOT AND A.P.W.A.STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS. .THE DESIGN SHOWN IS BASED UPON THE ENGINEER'S UNDERSTANDING OF THE EXISTING CONDITIONS.THIS PLAN DOES NOT REPRESENT A DETAILED FIELD SURVEY.THE EXISTING CONDITIONS UPON SURVEY PREPARED BY PACE CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR SHOWN ON THIS PLAN SHEET ARE BASED INC.,DATED OCTOBER 14,2005.THE VERIFYING FIELD CONDITIONS PRIOR TO BIDDING THE PROPOSED SITEWORK IMPROVEMENTS.IF CONFLICTS ARE DISCOVERED,THE CONTRACTOR SHALL NOTIFY THE OWNER PRIOR TO INSTALLATION OF ANY PORTION OF THE SITEWORK WHICH WOULD BE AFFECTED. IF CONTRACTOR DOES NOT ACCEPT EXISTING SURVEY,INCLUDING TOPOGRAPHY, AS SHOWN ON THE PLANS,WITHOUT EXCEPTION,HE SHALL HAVE MADE,AT HIS OWN EXPENSE,A TOPOGRAPHIC SURVEY BY A REGISTERED LAND SURVEYOR AND SUBMIT IT TO THE OWNER FOR REVIEW. . . CAUTION -NOTICE TO CONTRACTOR THE CONTRACTOR IS SPECIFICALLY CAUTIONED THAT THE LOCATION AND/OR ELEVATION OF EXISTING UTILITIES AS SHOWN ON THESE PLANS IS BASED ON RECORDS OF THE VARIOUS UTIUTIES,AND WHERE POSSIBLE,MEASUREMENTS TAKEN IN THE FIELD.THE INFORMATION IS NOT TO BE RELIED ON AS BEING EXACT OR COMPLETE.THE CONTRACTOR MUST CALL THE APPROPRIATE UTILITY COMPANY AT LEAST 48 HOURS BEFORE ANY EXCAVATION TO REQUEST EXACT FIELD LOCATION OF UTILITIES.IT SHALL BE THE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE CONTRACTOR TO RELOCATE ALL IMPROVEMENTS WHICH CONFLICT PLANS. EXISTING WITH THE UTILITIES AND EXISTING PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS ON THE CONTRACTOR SHALL REFER TO ARCHITECTURAL PLANS FOR EXACT LOCATION AND DIMENSIONS OF VESTIBULE,SLOPED PAVING,EXIT PORCHES,SIDEWALKS, RAMPS AND TRUCK DOCKS,PRECISE BUILDING DIMENSIONS AND EXACT 1.ALL CONSTRUCTION/INSTALLATION OF SANITARY SEWER MAINS SHALL BE DONE 1•ALL CONSTRUCTION/INSTALLATION OF WATER MAINS SHALL BE DONE IN A 1. IN A SAFE,NEAT AND PROFESSIONAL MANNER,AND UNDER SUPERVISION OF SAFE,NEAT AND WORKMANLIKE MANNER,AND UNDER SUPERVISION BY UTILITY CITY FORCES AT ALL TIMES.ALL SAFETY REQUIREMENTS FROM OSHA AND OTHER PROVIDER FORCES AT ALL TIMES.ALL SAFETY REQUIREMENTS FROM OSHA STATE REGULATORY AGENCIES MUST BE MET.AND OTHER STATE REGULATING AGENCIES MUST BE MET. THE CONDUIT SHALL BE 2"DIAMETER CARLON TYPE "DB"DIRECT BURIAL TELEPHONE DUCT OR 2"SCHEDULE 40 PVC.INSTALL GALVANIZED PULL WIRE OR PURPLE PROPYLPOLYETHYLENE ROPE WITH A MINIMUM PULLING TENSION OF 100 POUNDS.THE MINIMUM BURIAL DEPTH SHALL BE 24".INSTALL AN ORANGE DETECTABLE HAZARD TAPE WITH INTEGRAL "BURIED FIBER OPTIC2.THE MINIMUM SIZE FOR PUBLIC SEWER MAINS SHALL BE 8"DIAMETER.ALL 2.WATER MAIN PIPE MATERIAL SHALL BE CLASS 52 DUCTILE IRON OR PVC PIPE CABLE"WORDING,12"ABOVE THE CONDUIT. SANITARY SEWER PIPING SHALL BE SCHEDULE D3034 PVC OR EQUAL.MINIMUM MEETING LOCAL REQUIREMENTS.POLYETHYLENE WRAP IS REQUIRED ON ALL METALS.2. . . .. . AN 18-INCH MINIMUM SEPARATION IS REQUIRED ON SERVICE TAPS ON A MAIN LINE. PIPE DIAMETER FOR PRIVATE LATERALS IS 4"AND OF SCHEDULE D3034 PVC OR EQUAL.ALL SANITARY SEWER LATERALS MUST BE PROPERLY MARKED AT ENDS. CONNECTIONS INTO THE EXISTING SANITARY SEWER MAINS REQUIRE ISSUANCE OF PUBLIC WORKS PERMIT AND INSPECTION BY THE LOCAL JURISDICTION PRIOR TO BACKFILLING. ALL NEW SANITARY SEWER PIPES AND MANHOLES MUST BE THOROUGHLY CLEANED,INSPECTED AND PRESSURE/VACUUM TESTED AS REQUIRED BY UTILITY PROVIDER AND GOVERNMENTAL AGENCIES WITH JURISDICTION. ALL TESTS MUST BE AND GOVERNMENTAL INTO OPERATION. WITNESSED AND PASSED BY THE UTILITY PROVIDER AGENCIES WITH JURISDICTION PRIOR TO PLACING THE CONTRACTOR SHALL PROVIDE TO THE UTILITY PROVIDER ANY GUARANTEE OR WARRANTY NORMALLY FURNISHED WITH THE PURCHASE OF ANY MATERIALS USED IN CONNECTION WITH THE PROJECT AT HAND. . . 6. . • 3/4 INCH AND ALL TAPS I-I/4" CLASS 52 DUCTILE IRON MAY BE DIRECT TAPPED FOR l-INCH SIZE SERVICES.SADDLES SHALL BE USED ON -2"DIAMETER IN ANY PUBLIC MAIN. ALL ELBOWS/BENDS ON WATER MAINS SHALL HAVE THRUST BLOCKS. A DEPTH OF 42"FROM FINISHED GRADE TO THE TOP OF THE WATER MAIN IS REQUIRED.PLACING WATER LINES SHALLOWER THAN 42'IS PROHIBITED. FLUSHED,PRESSURE TESTED,AND AND INSPECTED BY UTILITY PROVIDER JURISDICTION. ALL NEW PIPES MUST BE PROPERLY CHLORINATED BY THE CONTRACTOR, AND GOVERNMENTAL AGENCIES WITH BACKFLOW PREVENTION DEVICES (DOUBLE CHECK BACKFLOW PREVENTORS, AND ATMOSPHERIC UTILITY PROVIDER AND ALL REDUCED PRESSURE BACKFLOW PREVENTORS,PRESSURE VACUUM BREAKERS,ETC.)MUST BE APPROVED BY THE GOVERNMENTAL AGENCIES WITH JURISDICTION. o ALL CHANGES IN DIRECTION OF THE CONDUIT WILL REQUIRE LONG FACTORY SWEEPS (NOT STANDARD SWEEPS)WITH RADIUS NOT LESS THAN 10 TIMES THE DIAMETER OF THE CONDUIT.NO MORE THAN TWO 90-DEGREE BENDS WILL BE ALLOWED BETWEEN PULLING POINTS,OR A TOTAL OF 180 DEGREES COMBINED IN SEVERAL BENDS.PULL BOXES SHALL BE LOCATED EVERY 450 FEET UNLESS THE COMBINED TOTAL OF BENDS REQUIRES ADDITIONAL BOXES. CONDUIT SHOULD ENTER AND EXIT THE PULL BOXES 180 DEGREES APART. ALL PULL BOXES LOCATED IN PAVED AREAS SUBJECT TO SHALL BE "H-20"LOAD RATED.THE TYPICAL PULL BOX 24"X 24".DEEPER BOXES MAY BE REQUIRED WHEN THE TRUCK TRAFFIC SIZE WILL BE 18"X CONDUIT ALIGNMENT IS AFFECTED BY OTHER UTILITIES.THE PULL BOX SHALL BE INSTALLED PER THE MANUFACTURER'S SPECIFICATIONS WITH A CONCRETE COLLAR AND A MINIMUM OF 8"OF GRAVEL COMPACTED PER PROJECT SPECIFICATIONS. IF USING A PULL BOX TO CHANGE DIRECTION,THE MINIMUM BOX SIZE SHALL BE 48"X 48"X 24"PRE-CAST CONCRETE WITH SEPARATE MANHOLE LID AND COLLAR. BUILDING UTILITY ENTRANCE LOCATIONS. 5.REFER TO INTERIOR PLUMBING DRAWINGS FOR TIE-IN OF ALL UTILITIES.9.ALL NEW CONNECTIONS TO EXISTING WATER MAINS REQUIRE ISSUANCE OF APUBLICWORKSPERMITANDINSPECTIONBYTHECITYORGOVERNMENTAL 6.ALL FILL MATERIAL SHALL BE IN PLACE,AND COMPACTED BEFORE AGENCIES WITH JURISDICTION PRIOR TO BACKFILLING. NSTALLATION OF PROPOSED UTILITIES.10.BACKFLOW PREVENTION DEVICES SHALL BE CONSTRUCTED OF CORROSION 7.CONTRACTOR SHALL NOTIFY THE UTILITY AUTHORITIES INSPECTORS 72 HOURS RESISTANT MATERIALS. BEFORE CONNECTING TO ANY EXISTING LINE• ,.A PULL BOX SHALL BE LOCATED AS CLOSE TO THE BUILDING AS POSSIBLE, WITH A SWEEP MAKING THE VERTICAL BEND INTO THE STORE• .THE CONDUIT SHALL BE TERMINATED WITH STATION LEASE AREA AS DESIGNATED ON SPECIAL PROJECTS MANAGER• A PULL BOX AT THE EDGE OF THE THE STATION PLANS OR BY THE 8.MINIMUM WATER AND SANITARY SEWER TRENCH WIDTH SHALL BE 2 FEET. 9.ALL UTILITIES SHOULD BE KEPT TEN (10')APART (PARALLEL)OR WHEN CROSSING 18"VERTICAL CLEARANCE (OUTSIDE EDGE OF PIPE TO OUTSIDE EDGE 10. OF PIPE).IN THE EVENT OF A VERTICAL CONFLICT BETWEEN WATERLINES,SANITARY LINES, STORM LINES AND GAS LINE (EXISTING AND PROPOSED),THE SANITARY LINE SHALL BE DUCTILE IRON PIPE WITH MECHANICAL JOINTS AT LEAST 10 FEET ON BOTH SIDES OF CROSSING,THE WATERLINE SHALL BE MECHANICAL JOINTS WITH APPROPRIATE THRUST CLEARANCE,MEETING C-151)(CLASS 50). BLOCKING AS REQUIRED REQUIREMENTS OF ANSI TO PROVIDE A MINIMUM OF 18" A21.10 AND ANSI 21.11 (AWWA 11. 12. LINES UNDERGROUND BACKFILLING. SHALL BE INSTALLED,INSPECTED AND APPROVED BEFORE CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR LOCAL AUTHORITIES WITH REGARD WATER AND SEWER LINES. COMPLYING WiTH THE SPECIFICATIONS OF THE TO MATERIALS AND INSTALLATION OF THE 13.ALL NECESSARY INSPECTIONS AND/OR CERTIFICATIONS REQUIRED BY CODES AND/OR UTILITY SERVICE COMPANIES SHALL BE PERFORMED PRIOR TO ANNOUNCED BUILDING POSSESSION AND THE FINAL CONNECTION OF SERVICE. 14.CONTRACTOR SHALL COORDINATE WITH ALL UTILITY COMPANIES FOR INSTALLATION REQUIREMENTS AND SPECIFICATIONS. 15.CONTRACTOR TO PROVIDE TRENCHING,BACKFILL,2 -4"PVC SCHEDULE 40 CONDUITS,AND PULLING WIRES FOR UNDERGROUND TELEPHONE SERVICE FROM EXISTING FACILITIES AS SHOWN ON PLANS.CONTRACTOR TO COORDINATE INSTALLATION AND POINT OF CONNECTION WITH UTILITY PROVIDER. 16. 17. CONTRACTOR IS TO PROVIDE TRENCHING,CONDUIT,AND BACKFILL FOR ALL UNDERGROUND POWER LINE AND VAULTS AS REQUIRED BY UTILITY PROVIDER. POWER LINES AND POLES TO BE INSTALLED BY UTILITY PROVIDER.SEE SITE ELECTRICAL PLAN FOR SITE LIGHTING AND FOR PRIMARY ELECTRIC SERVICE LOCATIONS. GAS PIPING SHOWN FOR COORDINATION ONLY.INSTALLATION OF THE GAS MAIN AND METER TO BE ACCOMPLISHED BY UTILITY PROVIDER. REVISIOr,ISPREB,O' "POST,,,O SETISSUEDAEISSUEDATE DATE DESCRIPTION 6/19/06 <SEPA RESUBMITTAL 1/31/06 SEPA SUBMITTAL | t P, I kll LJ = 711 I m !t Z --U- €- I LOWE'S HIW,INC.IIFAR OAY AVE.,SU,TE IICARLSBAD,CA 920o I1760.804.5300 (V)760.918.9112 (F)I THIS DRAWING IS THE PROPERTY OF LOWE'S HOME I CENTERS,INC,ANY USE OR REPRODUCTION IN I WHOLE OR PART IS PROHIBITED WITHOUT THE I EXPRESSED WRITrEN CONSENT OF LOWE S HOME I CENTERS,INC.COPYRIGHT 2001 ALL RIGHTS RESERVED I ORIGINAL I- fmlm On,., ISSUE DATE:01131/06 PERMIT SET ISSUE DATE: CONSTRUCTION SET ISSUE DATE: DRAWING NUMBER: ( II I PC-3.1 E C-q I @ .(-- Z <IZ g S/CLJ 0 __J/Z0F--Z LLJC/c-O C c-COC) /dd PLANT SCHEDULE BOTANICAL/COMMON NAME SHRUBS BERBERIS THUNBER61ANA 'ROSE GLOW'/ROSE GLOW BARBERRY EUONYMUS AI..ATA 'COMPACTA'/DWARF INGL:'D EUONYMUS MANONIA AQUIFOLIUM 'COMPACTA'/ COMPACT OREGON GRAPE OSMAN n'lUS DELAVAYI/DELAVAY OSMANTRUS PICEA PUNGENS 'FAT ALBERT PINUS MUO0 MUmUS/MUGO PINE PO'II'fLLt/)_".....UCO.SA G.D.RN6E'R'/UL IN.Nr.I'L SPIRAEA 'SNOtMOUND'/ GROUNDCOVER ARCTOSTAPHYLOS UVA-URSl 'VANCOUVER JADE'/KINNIKINNICK 'VANCOUVER JADE' HYPEICUM ..£ALYQU/"bl.JOHN m JUNIPERUS HORIZONTAUS 'LTONII'BLUE CARPET JUNIPER LAURENIIA FLUVITAUS I SIZE/COMMENTS 5 GAL.CONT.,18"MIN.HEIGHT,FULL &BUSHY 18-24:HT.,B&B,FUll &BUSHY 15-18"HT.,B&B,FUll &BUSHY 5 GAL CONT.,18"MIN.HT.,&BUSHY 15-18 SPREAD,B,FULL &BUSHY 15-18"SPREAD,B,FULL &BUSHY 2 GAL,CONT.,15"MIN.SPREAD,FULL &BUSHY 5 GAL,CONT.,12"MIN.SPRD.,FUll &BUSHY 1 GAL CONT.,FULL &BUSHY,SPECIMENQU/.ITY,PLANT @ 30"O.C.,25%MUGO 4"POT CONT.,PLANT 0 24"O.C 4."POT CONT.,PLANT 0 24."O,C, 4"POTS,PLANT @ 24"O,C. REQUIRED mEES (I/6 STALL S)=69 mEES C_BLUE STAR CREEPER PROVIDED TREES i 77 TREES I ::;:':";:,.,,:,.,...;.SOD LAV*N B.TOTAL PARKING LOT LANDSCAPING *<;;;'< REQUIRED LANDSCAPING (35 SF/S"/LL)14,585 S.F.GRAPHIC SC PROVIDED LANDSCAPING -15,013 S.F.,o o o il ,-"_... (m ') 1 fot,=40 ft. SYMBOL BOTANICAL/COMMON NAME I SIZE/COMMENTS SYMBOL A TREES I[_^CER eNNALLA 'FL¢Z 12"CAL.,PLANED A:r,4O'O.C._._AUTUMN FLAME MAPLE I HT.,BRANCHED •6,SPECIMEN UALlfY @ -CHAMAECYPARIS NOOII(AIENSIS 'PENDULA'/18'MIN.HT.,SPECIMEN QUAUTY, -WEEPING ALASKAN CEDAR I , 1/___1 WPELSDON AMERICAN SWEETId I n.,on ..,-.-,,,,..w..=,, l.NUSN,-- F,O.,®...-'I AUSIRIANBLACK PINE I ,,2"CAL.MATCHED T,BB 10'MIN.I PYRUS CALLERYANA CHAN'IlCt.ER,I o,®I 'CHAN]ICLEER'FLOI RING PEAR I "'"-'-----"'.........I PRUNUS SA&ENI 'COLUMNARIS'/12"CAL/,MATCHED ST,BB,I0:MIN;,,..,.v O ®I mUJA OCCIDENTAl.IS 'SMARAGD'/15 GAL CONT.,7-8'HT.,FUlLIEMERALDGREENARBORVITAE:I .BUSHY,MATCHED VARIEIIES ( LANDSCAPE CAL :ULATIONS PARKING LOT LANDSCAPING A.PARKING LOT TREES PL., xNTING N(DTES: 1.ALL PLANTS MUST BE HEALTHY,VIGOROUS MATERIAL,FREE OF 13.STANDARDS SET FORTH IN "AMERICAN STANDARD FOR NURSERY PESTS AND DISEASE.STOI :K"REPRESENT GUIDELINE SPECIFICATIONS ONLY AND SHALL 2.ALL PLANTS MUST BE CONTAINER GROWN OR BALLED AND CONSTITUTE MINIMUM QUAUTY REQUIREMENTS FOR PLANT MATERIAL BURLAPPED AS INDICATED IN THE PLANT UST.1€.ALL SHRUB,GROUND COVER AND SEASONAL COLOR ANNUAL 3.ALL TREES MUST BE STRAIGHT TRUNKED AND FULL HEADED AND PLANTING BEDS ARE TO BE COMPLETELY COVERED WITH BARK MULCH MEET ALL REQUIREMENTS SPECIFIED.TO A MINIMUM DEPTH OF TWO INCHES. &ALL PLANTS ARE SUBJECT TO THE APPROVAL OF THE LANDSCAPE 15.LOCATIONS OF EXlSTINC BURIED UTILITY LINES SHOWN ON THE ARCHITECT BEFORE,DURING,AND AFTER INSTALLATION.PLANS ARE BASED UPON BEST AVAILABLE INFORMATION AND ARE TO 5.ALL TREES MUST BE GUYED OR STAKED AS SHOWN IN THE BE CONSIDERED APPROXIMATE.IT SHALL BE THE RESPONSIBILITY OFDETAILS.THE CONTRACTOR TO VERIFY THE LOCATIONS OF UllUTY UNES AND 6.ALL PLANTING AREAS MUST BE COMPLETELY MULCHED AS ADJACENT TO THE WORK AREA.THE CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLESPECIFIED.FOR THE PROTECTION OF ALL U1]UTY UNES DURING THE 7.PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION,THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE CONSTRUCTION PERIOD.RESPONSIBLE FOR LOCATING ALL UNDERGROUND UTIUTIES AND SHALL 16.SAFE,CLEARLY MARKED PEDESTRIAN AND VEHICULAR ACCESS TO AVOID DAMAGE TO ALL UTILITIES DURING THE COURSE OF THE WORK.ALL ADJACENT PROPERTIES MUST BE MAINTAINED THROUGHOUT THE THE CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR REPAIRING ANY AND ALL CONSTRUCTION PROCESS. DAMAGE TO UTIUTIES,STRUCTURES,SITE APPURTENANCES,ETC.WHICH 17.DURING THE GROWING SEASON ALL ANNUALS SHALL REMAIN IN A OCCURS AS A RESULT OF THE LANDSCAPE CONSTRUCTION.HEALTHY,VITAL CONDITION THROUGHOUT THE CONSTRUCTION PERIOD. 8.THE CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR VERIFYING ALL QUANTITIES 18.ALL PLANT MATERIALS QUANTITIES SHOWN ARE APPROXIMATE. SHOWN ON THESE PLANS BEFORE PRICING THE WORK.CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR COMPLETE COVERAGE OF 9.THE CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR FULLY MAINTAINING ALL ALL PLANTING BEDS AT SPACING SHOWN GRAPHICALLY. PLANTING (INCLUDING BUT NOT UMITED TO:WATERING,SPRAYING,19.ALL LAWN AREAS ARE TO RECEIVE 4"OF TOPSOIL ALL MULCHING,FERTlUZING,MOWING,ETC.)OF THE PLANTING AND LAWN LANDSCAPE BED AREAS ARE TO RECEIVE 6"OF TOPSOIL AREAS UNTIL THE WORK IS ACCEPTED IN TOTAL BY THE OWNER.20.REFER TO SPECIFICATIONS FOR ALL INFORMATION NEEDED FOR 10.THE CONTRACTOR SHALL COMPLETELY GUARANTEE ALL PLANT IMPLEMENTATION OF PLANTING PLANS. MATERIAL FOR A PERIOD OF ONE (1)YEAR BEGINNING ON THE DATE 21.ALL LANDSCAPED AREAS ARE TO BE WATERED VIA AUTOMATIC OF TOTAL ACCEPTANCE.THE CONTRACTOR SHALL PROMPTLY MAKE IRRIGATION SYSTEM. ALL REPLACEMENTS BEFORE OR AT THE END OF THE GUARANTEE 22.INSTALL A WEED BARRIER IN ALL LANDSCAPE BED AREAS (SEE CL PERIOD.SPECIRcAllONS).1"e ORIGINAL '11.AFTER BEING DUG AT THE NURSERY SOURCE,ALL TREES IN LEAF 23.A 4"X6"CONCRETE HEADERBoARD t SEE LANDSCAPE &IRRIGATION l,SSUE DATE:"01/17/06 SHALL BE ACCUMATED FOR TWO (2)WEEKS UNDER A MIST SYSTEM DETAIL SHEET)SHALL BE INSTALLED BETWEEN ALL GRASSED AREAS I PERMIT SET PRIOR TO INSTALLATION.(SOD OR HYI)ROSEED)AND LANDSCAPE PLANTING BEDS.ALSO,A |ISSUE DATE:12.ANY PLANT MATERIAL WHICH DIES,TURNS BROWN,OR DEFOUATES WOOD HEADERBoARD SHALL BE INSTALLED BETWEEN GRAVELED OR (PRIOR TO TOTAL ACCEPTANCE OF THE WORK)SHALL BE PROMPTLY ROCKED AREAS AND LANDSCAPE AREAS (BED OR GRASSED).CALL 48 HOURS !ssuEICONSTRUCTDA: REMOVED FROM THE SITE AND REPLACED WITH MATERIAL OF THE 24.PARKING LOT PLANTERS SHALL BE BERMED AT A 5.1 SLOPE.BEFORE YOU DIG j DRAVVINGNU:-SAME SPECIES,QUANTITY,AND SIZE AND MEETING ALL PLANT UST --800--424--5555,SPECIFICATIONS.THERE SHALL BE A 1.5"CURB VEAL ALONG THE BACK EDGE 0F Ip L_.0CURBTOPREVENTMULCHFROMSLUFFINGONTOPAVEMENT.l 1 I 1 4L0%PLAN S T _o lJ • . GRADING NOTES STORM DRAINAGE NOTES REVISIONS,PRE-BID srT POST BID SET ISSUE DAlt ISSUE DATE DATE 6/19/06 < DESCRIPTION THE DESIGN SHOWN IS BASED UPON THE ENGINEER'S UNDERSTANDING OF THE EXISTING 1.EXISTING DRAINAGE STRUCTURES TO BE INSPECTED AND REPAIRED AS NEEDED,AND SEPA RESUBMITTAL CONDITIONS.THE PLAN DOES NOT REPRESENT A DETAILED FIELD SURVEY.THE EXISTING PIPES TO BE CLEANED OUT TO REMOVE ALL SILT AND DEBRIS.J/31/°6 <SEPASUBMITTAL PREPAREDEXISTINGCONDITIONSByPACE,INc.,SHOWNDATEDON THISocTOBERPLAN 14,SHEET2005.ARETHEBASEDcoNTRACToRUPONTHEIs SURVEY]'I ..4 t -2.IF ANY EXISTING STRUCTURES TO REMAIN ARE DAMAGED DURING CONSTRUCTION IT i! RESPONSIBLE FOR VERIFYING FIELD CONDITIONS PRIOR TO BIDDING THE PROPOSED SHALL BE THE CONTRACTORS RESPONSIBILITY TO REPAIR AND/OR REPLACE THE :. SITEWORK IMPROVEMENTS.IF CONFLICTS ARE DISCOVERED,THE CONTRACTOR SHALL EXISTING STRUCTURE AS NECESSARY TO RETURN IT TO EXISTING CONDITIONS OR , WOULD BE AFFECTED.IF CONTRACTOR DOES NOT ACCEPT EXISTING SURVEY,INCLUDING "P TOPOGRAPHY AS SHOWN ON THE PLANS,WITHOUT EXCEPTION,HE SHALL HAVE MADE,3.STORM DRAINAGE PIPE WITH LESS THAN 2-0"COVER SHALL BE CLASS IV REINFORCED AT HIS OWN EXPENSE,A TOPOGRAPHIC SURVEY BY A REGISTERED LAND SURVEYOR CONCRETE PIPE,OR APPROVED EQUAL TO SUSTAIN H-20 LOADING. AND SUBMIT IT TO THE OWNER FOR REVIEW. CAUTION -NOTICE TO CONTRACTOR THE CONTRACTOR IS SPECIFICALLY CAUTIONED AT THE OF EXISTING UTILITIES AS SHOWN ON THESE PLANS IS LOCATION AND/OR ELEVATION BASED ON RECORDS OF THE VARIOUS UTILITY COMPANIES AND,WHERE POSSIBLE,MEASUREMENTS TAKEN IN THE FIELD.THE INFORMATION IS NOT BE RELIED ON AS BEING EXACT OR COMPLETE.THE CONTRACTOR MUST CALL THE APPROPRIATE UTILITY COMPANY AT LEAST 4.8 HOURS BEFORE ANY EXCAVATION TO REQUEST EXACT FIELD LOCATION OF UTILITIES.IT SHALL BE THE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE CONTRACTOR TO RELOCATE ALL EXISTING UTILITIES WHICH CONFLICT WITH THE PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS SHOWN ON THESE PLANS. 4.ALL ONSITE STORM DRAINAGE PIPE SHALL BE SMOOTH WALLED INTERIOR, MANUFACTURER'S VERIFICATION OF MANNING'S ROUGHNESS COEFFICIENT N=0.012 OR LESS. 5.PRECAST STRUCTURES MAY BE USED AT CONTRACTOR'S OPTION. 6.ALL CATCH BASINS AND AREA DRAINS ARE TO BE SITUATED SUCH THAT THE OUTSIDE EDGE OF GRATE FRAME IS AT TOE OF CURB OR FLOWLINE OF GUTTER (WHERE APPLICABLE). . m m CATCH BASIN INLET PROTECTION /EROSION CONTROL TO BE USED FOR ALL NEW INLETS. . . Q THE SPOT ELEVATIONS INDICATED ON THIS PLAN REPRESENT THE DESIGN TOP OF PAVEMENT,UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. CONTRACTOR REMOVAL OF REMOVED TO IS RESPONSIBLE FOR DEMOLITION OF EXISTING STRUCTURES INCLUDING ANY EXISTING UTILITIES SERVING THE STRUCTURE.UTILITIES ARE TO BE THE RIGHT-OF-WAY. .ALL STORM PIPE ENTERING STRUCTURES SHALL BE GROUTED TO ASSURE CONNECTION AT STRUCTURE IS WATERTIGHT. .ALL STORM SEWER MANHOLES IN PAVED AREAS SHALL BE FLUSH WITH PAVEMENT, AND SHALL HAVE TRAFFIC BEARING RING AND COVERS.MANHOLES IN UNPAVED AREAS SHALL BE 6"ABOVE FINISH GRADE.LIDS SHALL BE LABELED "SIORM SEWER". ALL UNSURFACED AREAS DISTURBED BY GRADING OPERATION SHALL RECEIVE 4 INCHES OF TOPSOIL.CONTRACTOR SHALL APPLY STABILIZATION FABRIC TO ALL SLOPES 3H:IV OR STEEPER.CONTRACTOR SHALL STABILIZE DISTURBED AREAS WITH GRASS IN 10.ALL STORM STRUCTURES SHALL HAVE A SMOOTH UNIFORM POURED MORIAR INVERT ACCORDANCE WITH LOCAL SPECIFICATION UNTIL A HEALTHY STAND OF GRASS IS FROM INVERT IN TO INVERT OUT,UNLESS OTHERWISE SHOWN IN THE CATCH BASIN OBTAINED.DETAIL. ALL CUT AND FILL SLOPES SHALL BE CONSTRUCTED PER THE UBC CODE AND 11.CONTRACTOR SHALL CONNECT ROOF DRAIN LEADERS TO PROPOSED STORM DRAINS AS APPLICABLE LOCAL REGULATION.ALL CUT AND FILL SLOPES SHALL BE 3:1 OR SHOWN. FLATTER UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. . . • 10. 11. CONTRACTOR SHALL ASSURE POSITIVE DRAINAGE NATURAL AND PAVED AREAS AND SHALL GRADE OF WATER. AWAY FROM BUILDINGS FOR ALL ALL AREAS TO PRECLUDE PONDING ALL POLLUTANTS OTHER THAN HANDLED AND DISPOSED OF IN STORMWATER.THE CONTRACTOR SHALL ADHERE TO ALL TERMS OUTLINED IN THE GENERAL N.P.D.E.S.PERMIT FOR STORMWATER ASSOCIATED WITH CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES. SEDIMENT ON-SITE DURING CONSTRUCTION SHALL BE A MANNER THAT DOES NOT CAUSE CONTAMINATION OF AND CONDITIONS AS DISCHARGE PROPERTIES AND WATERWAYS DOWNSTREAM OF THE SITE SHALL BE PROTECTED FROM EROSION DUE TO INCREASES IN THE VOLUME,VELOCITY AND PEAK FLOW RATE OF STORMWATER RUNOFF FROM PROJECT SITE. CONSTRUCTION SHALL COMPLY WITH ALL APPLICABLE GOVERNING CODES AND BE CONSTRUCTED TO SAME. CONTRACTOR TO REMOVE UNSUITABLE SOILS LOCATED WITHIN THE BUILDINGS SPLAY UNE OF THE FOOTINGS. FOR BOUNDARY AND TOPOGRAPHIC INFORMATION REFER TO PROJECT SURVEY. FOR LAYOUT INFORMATION REFER TO THE SITE PLAN AND HORIZONTAL CONTROL PLAN. I,D I --II 0 0 S I Z I--" O C ..k'k '7'',''J)CO •-,•I LOWE S HIW,INC.I I 1530 FARADAY AVE.,SUITE 4o I I CAR'SBAD,CA 9Z00S I1760.804.5300 (V)760.918.9112 (F)I THIS DRAWING IS THE PROPERTY OF LOWE'S HOME | CENTERS,INC.ANY USE OR REPRODUCTION IN | WHOLE OR PART IS PROHIBITED WITHOUT THE I EXPRESSED WRI'Iq'EN CONSENT OF LOWE S HOME I CENTERS,INC.COPYRIGHT 2001 ALL RIGHTS RESERVED I UJ 0Z OwzON<<_z 0 ORIGINAL ISSUE DATE: Z 4; }... z 01131/06 PERMIT SET ISSUE DATE: CONSTRUCTION SET ISSUE DATE: DRAWING NUMBER: Zor) >- Wv0W Or) Z >-t,n o o¢,1 o I1. PC-2.1 ...."....... ATLAS OF SEATTLE COPYRIGHTED &PUBLISHED BY KROLL MAP COMPANY,INC.,SEATTLE SCALE:1 INCH =200 FEET NOTE:Krolt Maps are compiled from Official Records and FieldSurveys.Theyare produced for m.ference use only and no warranty m expressed or implied. County Tax Lot NO Building Approx Stori#s LEGEND House Number I-"1 Private Road r Short Plat &P.178144 I I I I I I I • FINISHES cD F-1 FACTORY BLACK VINYL COATED FAB.PF-1 SNOWDRIFT WHITE OR EQUAL (PRE-FINISHED) (CHAIN-LINK FABRIC)PIF--2 LOWE'S MEDIUM GRAY (PRE-FINISHED) F-2 FACTORY BLACK POWDER COATED(SECURITY FABRIC)PF'-3 MANUFACTURERS STANDARD WHITE P-t LOWE+S LIGHT GRAY (PAINT)PF'-4 MANUFACTURERS STANDARD GRAY P-2 LOWE'S MEDIUM GRAY (PAINT)EF-1 LOWE'S LIGHT GRAY (E.I.F.S.) P-3 LOWE'S DARK GRAY (PAINT)EF-2 LOWE'S MEDIUM GRAY (E.I.F.S.) P--4,LOWE'S RED (PAINT) I=-50SHA YELLOW (PAINT) P-6 MANUFACTURERS STANDARDBRIGHTWHITE(PAINT) IEIF-3 LOWE'S BLUE (E.I.F.S.) EF-4 LOWE'S WHITE (E.LF.S.) IEF'-5 LOWE'S DARK GRAY (E.I.F.S.) NA NATURAL ANODIZED (ALUM.) NO1TJ SEE SPECIFICATIONS FOR APPROVED MANUFACTURERS.UNLESS SPECIFICALLY CALLED OUT,CONTACT MANUFACTURER FOR LOWE'S NATIONAL ACCOUNT COLOR FORMULAS. KEYNOTES 1.01 SIGNAGE-FURNISHED AND INSTALLED BY OWNER (LOWE'S).SEE SHTS.A-3.1,3.2 FOR BE CENTERED ONBLOCKINGLOCATIONS.HORZ.PosmoN OF SIGNAGE TO VINYL COATED FABRIC BACKGROUND ELEMENT. 2.01 CHAIN-UNK FENCE WITH BLACK SPECIRCATION SECT.02822). (SEE SHEET A-7.0 AND 2.02 CHAIN-UNK FENCE WITH SECURITY FENCING UP TO 8"-0" ABOVE FINISHED GRADE (SEE SHEET A-7.0 AND SPECIFICATION SECT.02822). 203 CHAIN-UNK GATE (SEE SHEET A-7.0,FOR SIZE AND TYPE,AND SPEC.SECT.02822) 2.04 TRENCH DRAIN (SEE DETAIL 11/S-3.0,SHEET P-1 AND P-3,AND SPEC SECT.154.31). 2,06 48"HIGH x 75'LONG GUARDRAIL/FENCE (SEE DETAIL 9/S-3.0) 3,01 CONCRETE RETAINING WALL W/6"HIGH CONCRETE CURB (SEE SHEETS S/1.0 AND S/3.0). 3,02 CONCRETE SIDEWALK. 3,03 TACTILE WARNING GROOVES IN CONCRETE (SEE SHEET S-3.0). 3,04,CONCRETE FILLED ISLAND (SEE STRUCTURAL &CIVIL DRAWINGS). 3.05 CONCRETE TRANSFORMER PAD,VERIFY SIZE &LOCATION PRIOR TO POURING (SEE SHEETS A-4.0 &S-1.0). ,3,06 CONCRETE GENERATOR PAD VERIFY SIZE &LOCATION PRIOR TO POURING (SEE SHEET A-4.0 &S-1.0). 3,07 CONCRETE SLAB ON GRADE (SEE STRUCTURAL DRAWINGS). 3.08 JOINT SEALANT OVER 1/2"EXPANSION JOINT FILLER (SEE SPECIFICATION SECT.07920). 3,09 CONCRETE CONTROL JOINT (SEE SHEET S-3.0). 4..01 BUILDING EXPANSION JOINT.__4,02 MASONRY CONTROL JOINT,TYPICAL (SEE SHEETS A 5.0 &S 3.1). 4,03 SINGLE SCORED SMOOTH FACE CMU. 4,04 SPLIT FACE CMU. 4,,05 SMOOTH FACE CMU. 4,,06 BULLNOSE CMU ACCENT BLOCK. 4,07 SINGLE SCORED SPLIT FACE CMU. 5,01 METAL DOWNSPOUTS,PAINTED. 5.02 METAL GUTTER,PAINTED. §,03 STEEL CANOPY (SEE SHEERS A-2.1,A-3.2,A-3.3 AND S-4.2),PAINTED. 5.04 STEEL TUBE,PAINTED. 5.03 ROOF ACCESS LADDER,PAINTED (SEE SHEET A-70) 5.06 FORKLIFT DAMAGE PREVENTION BARS-16'-0"L.W/BOT.•9'-6"A FF (SEE SHEET A-2.2). 5.07 FORKLIFT DAMAGE PREVENTION BARS-7'-O"L W/BOTI'OM •9'-4"F.F.(SEE SHEET A-2.2). 5.06 FORKLIFT DAMAGE PREVENTION BARS-16'-0'L W/BOTTOM •13'--6 A.F.F.(SEE SHEET A-2.2). 5.09 PROVIDE 4"PIPE BOLLARDS (SEE DETAIL 3/S-3.1)-NUMBER AND LOCATION.PER ARCHITECTURAL PLANS AND DOOR DETAILS . 5.10 PROVIDE 6"""PIPE BOLLARDS (SEE DETAIL 3/S-3.1)-NUMBER AND LOCATIONS PER ARCHITECTURAL PLANS AND DOOR DETAILS . 5.11 PROVIDE 6"'PIPE BOLLARDS (SEE DETAIL 3/S-3.1)AT GAS METER.NUMBER AND LOCATION PER PLUMBING PLANS. 5.12 STEEL DOWNSPOUT COVER,PAINTED (SEE DETAIL 13/A 3.0) 6.01 CART GUARD -P.T.2x10 STAINED LIGHT GRAY,MOUNTED 5"A.F.F.TO BOTTOM WITH 1/2"lDX4"EXP.BOLTS (COUNTERSUNK)•36"O.C..,%. 6.02 TELEPHONE BOARD -4x8 SHEET PLYWOOD •4 A.F.F.WITH INTUMESCENT COATING ON ALL SIDES PRIOR TO INSTALLATION (SEE SPECIFICATION SECTION 07812). 7.01 ACRYUC RNISH SYSTEM,BY E.I.F.S.MANUFACTURER,ON SMOOTH FACED CMU WITH FLUSH JOINTS. 7.02 EXTERIOR INSULATION AND FINISH SYSTEM (E.I.F.S.). 7,03 STANDING SEAM ARCHITECTURAL METAL ROOF PANEL. 7,04 PRE-FINISH?METAL COPING ON TO?OF pARAPETS &PILASTERS. 7.05 MEDALLION E.I.F.S.(SEE SHEETS A 2.1,A 3.1,A 3.2 AND A 3.3) 7.06 CORNICE -E.I.F.S.WITH PRE-FINISHED METAL COPING (SEE SHEETS A-2.1,A-3.1, A-3.2 AND A-3.3) 7.07 PRE-FINISHED METAL FASCIA. 8.01 OVERHEAD DOOR. 8,02 HOLLOW METAL DOOR AND FRAME TYPICAL,PAINTED. 8.03 ALUMINUM s'rOREFRONT. 8.04 AUTO-SLIDER DOOR (SEE SHEET A-6.0). IL05 IMPACT DOOR (FACTORY FINISH),STEEL TUBE FRAME PAINTED. +++i .E /IToO. 3 T.O.MASONRY .__ I T.O.MASONRY 28 B.O. B.O.CANOPY FoF. \ ---, /,%\\>/ M )NRY B.O.CANOPY / 11'-4" > I I I I I A 11<31 IO..I LIJ(/10Z -J._J :3 El 0 1(431 I1-1 I !E#J/SlON$"%A mo"ISSUE DATE ISSUE DATE DATE DESCRIPTION NL RGED ELE%AT!)N SCALE:1/8"=1'-0"A-2.0 O 133 m (.)O O <O r.)O rJ LJ ' -;30"-8" T.O.MASONRY FRAME =--i--- i =m SEE DET.3/A-2.11J T]F I X t_.•• I 00 'SCORED E IFS I ON 1-1/2"E.PS BOARD Interior and Exterior Iors Devoe Color Key #2H40F Sable Interior Color \MEDALLION- Devoe Color Key #2M39D Meteor Devoe Special Color \E.I.F.S.ON 1 -1/2" Interior Color LxWr?oSr #oedor NOTE:MEDALLION.....""TO "'BE L_._E.P.S.BOARD PAINTED BY PAINTING CONTRACTOR MEDALLION /A(CENT BAN[ SCALE:3/4"=1'4)"A-2.1 Devoe Special Color Lowe's Medium Gray Exterior Color Devoe Special Color Lowe's Light Gray Exterior Color Devoe Special Color Lowe's Dark Gray Exterior Color All co on thts card appro:tmate the acua/pant coloras accurately aspossible. 22121 17th Avenue SE,Ste.225 Bothell,Washington 98021 Telephone 425.827.2950 Facsimile 425.827.8412 www.ssoe,com Devoe #O3CCO1140/Card1 (September2003) COLOR SAMPLES LOWE'S OF RENToN WASHINGTON DECEMBER 12,2005SSOE,INC. ARCHITECTS •ENGINEERS LOWE'S HIW INC. 3.CURBREF:CIVIL m 1530 FARADAY AVE.,SUITE 140 CARLSBAD,CA 92008 760.804.5300 (V)760.918.9112 (F) •• THIS DRAWING IS THE PROPERTY OF LOWE'S HIW,INC.| ANY USE OR REPRODUCTION IN WHOLE OR PART IS | PROHIBITED WITHOUT THE EXPRESSED WRrl-rEN I CONSENT OF LOWE'S HIW,INC.COPYRIGHT 2005 ALL | RIGHTS RESERVED I 2 +cANLAR ;ED LE"/AI"ION "1/8"=1'4)"A-2.0 1 ENLAR,;EE)LE /, ,TION SCALE:1/8"=1'--0"A-2.0 .m.05102kD-A-21 CRITERIA ISSUE DATE: PERMIT SET ISSUE DATE: CONsTRUcTION SET ISSUE DATE: DRAWING NUMBER: 03.01.05 A-21 ,••I I I GARDEN A 'ENUE N. THROUGHOUT (TYP.) PLANF SCHEDULE SYMBOL BOTANICAL/COMMON NAME SIZE/COMMENTS SHRUBS TREES ACER GINNALLA 'FLAME'//AUTUMN FLAME MAPLE 2"CAL,PLANTED AT 40'O.C.HT.,BRANCHED @ 6,SPECIMEN QUALITY ® O BERBERIS THUNBERGIANA 'ROSE GLOW'/ROSE GLOW BARBERRY EUONYMUS ALATA 'COMPACTA'/DWARF WINGED EUONYMUS 5 GAL.CONT.,18"MIN.HEIGHT,FULL &BUSHY 18-24"HT.,B&B,FULL &BUSHY CHAMAECYPARIS NOOTKATENSIS 'PENDULA'/ WEEPING ALASKAN CEDAR LIQUIDAMBAR S]YRACIFLUA 'WORPELSDON'/ 'WORPELSDON'AMERICAN SWEETGUM PINUS NIGRA/ AUSTRIAN BLACK PINE 8'MIN.HT.,SPECIMEN QUALITY,B&B 2"CAL.,MATCHED S_E,T,B&B,10'MIN.elHT.,BRANCHED @ 5,SPECIMEN QUALITY 8'MIN.HT.,WELL FORMED,B&B ( PYRUS CALLERYANA 'CHANTICLEER'/2"CAL.,MATCHED S.E,T,B&B,10'MIN.'CHANTICLEER'FLOWERING PEAR HT.,BRANCHED @ 5,SPECIMEN QUALITY PRUNUS SARGENTII 'COLUMNARIS'/2"CAL.,MATCHED S.T,B&B,10'MIN.@ COLUMNAR SARGENT CHERRY HT.,BRANCHED @ 5,SPECIMEN QUALITY THUJA OCCIDENTALIS 'SMARAGD'/5 GAL.CONT.,7-8'HT.,FULL ( EMERALD GREEN ARBORVITAE &BUSHY,MATCHED VARIETIES LAN[)SCAPE CALCuLATIISt IS illA.PARKING LOT TREES R[QUIRED TREES (1//6 STALLS)=69 TREES : PROVIDED TREES =77 TREES B.TOTAL PARKING LOT LANDSCAPING REQUIRED LANDSCAPING (,35 SF//STALL)=14,585 S.F. PROVIDED LANDSCAPING =15,015 S.F.40 MAHONIA AQUIFOLIUM 'COMPACTA'/ COMPACT OREGON GRAPE OSMANTHUS DELAVAYI/DELAVAY OSMANTHUS 15-18"HT.,B&B,FULL &BUSHY 5 GAL.CONT.,18"MIN.HT.,FULL &BUSHY PICEA PUNGENS 'FAT ALBERT'15-18"SPREAD,B&B,FULL &BUSHY PINUS MUGO MUGHUS/MUGO PINE 15-18"SPREAD,B&B,FULL &BUSHY POTENTILLA FRUTICOSA 'GOLDFINGER'/2 GAL.,CONT.,15"MIN.SPREAD,'GOLDFINGER'CINQUEFOIL FULL &BUSHY SPIRAEA 'SNOWMOUND'/5 GAL.,CONT.,12"MIN.SPRD.,FULL &BUSHY GROUNDCOVER tRCTOSTAPHYLOS UVA-URSI 'VANCOUVER JADE'/1 GAL.CONT.,FULL &BUSHY,SPECIMEN KINNIKINNICK 'VANCOUVER JADE'QUALITY,PLANT @ 30"O.C.,25%MUGO HYPERICUM CALYCINUM/4"POT CONT.,PLANT @ 24"O.C. ST.JOHN'S WORT JUNIPERUS HORIZoNTALIS 'W1LTONIr 4"POT CONT.,PLANT @ 2#'O.C. BLUE CARPET JUNIPER LAURENTIA FLUVITALIS 4"POTS,PLANT @ 24"O.C.BLUE StAR CREEPER SOD LAWN GRAPHIC SCALE 0 20 40 80 160 (iN r.,T ) 1 inch =40 ft. THROUGHOUT (TYI .) NTING I()TES: 1.ALL PLANTS MUST BE HEALTHY,VIGOROUS MATERIAL,FREE PESTS AND DISEASE. 2.ALL PLANTS MUST BE CONTAINER GROWN OR BALLED AND BURLAPPED AS INDICATED IN THE PLANT LIST. 3.ALL TREES MUST BE STRAIGHT TRUNKED AND FULL HEADED MEET ALL REQUIREMENTS SPECIFIED. 4.ALL PLANTS ARE SUBJECT TO THE APPROVAL OF THE ARCHITECT BEFORE,DURING,AND AFTER INSTALLATION. 5.ALL TREES MUST BE GUYED OR STAKED AS SHOWN IN DETAILS. 6.ALL PLANTING AREAS MUST BE COMPLETELY MULCHED SPECIFIED. 7.PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION,THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE OF AND LANDSCAPE THE AS 13.STANDARDS SET FORTH IN "AMERICAN STANDARD FOR NURSERY STOCK"REPRESENT GUIDELINE SPECIFICATIONS ONLY AND SHALL CONSTITUTE MINIMUM QUALITY REQUIREMENTS FOR PLANT MATERIAL. 14.ALL SHRUB,GROUND COVER AND SEASONAL COLOR ANNUAL PLANTING BEDS ARE TO BE COMPLETELY COVERED WITH BARK MULCH TO A MINIMUM DEPTH OF TWO INCHES. 15.LOCATIONS OF EXISTING BURIED UTILITY LINES SHOWN ON THE PLANS ARE BASED UPON BEST AVAILABLE INFORMATION AND ARE TO BE CONSIDERED APPROXIMATE.IT SHALL BE THE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE CONTRACTOR TO VERIFY THE LOCATIONS OF UTILITY LINES AND ADJACENT TO THE WORK AREA.THE CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR THE PROTECTION OF ALL UTILITY LINES DURING THE CONSTRUCTION PERIOD. RESPONSIBLE FOR LOCATING ALL UNDERGROUND UTILITIES AND SHALL 16.SAFE,CLEARLY MARKED PEDESTRIAN AND VEHICULAR ACCESS TO AVOID DAMAGE TO ALL UTILITIES DURING THE COURSE OF THE WORK.ALL ADJACENT PROPERTIES MUST BE MAINTAINED THROUGHOUT THE THE CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR REPAIRING ANY AND ALL CONSTRUCTION PROCESS. DAMAGE TO UTILITIES,STRUCTURES,SITE APPURTENANCES,ETC.WHICH 17.DURING THE GROWING SEASON ALL ANNUALS SHALL REMAIN IN A OCCURS AS A RESULT OF THE LANDSCAPE CONSTRUCTION.HEALTHY,VITAL CONDITION THROUGHOUT THE CONSTRUCTION PERIOD. 8.THE CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR VERIFYING ALL QUANTITIES 18.ALL PLANT MATERIALS QUANTITIES SHOWN ARE APPROXIMATE. SHOWN ON THESE PLANS BEFORE PRICING THE WORK.CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR COMPLETE COVERAGE OF 9.THE CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR FULLY MAINTAINING ALL ALL PLANTING BEDS AT SPACING SHOWN GRAPHICALLY. PLANTING (INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO:WATERING,SPRAYING,19.ALL LAWN AREAS ARE TO RECEIVE 4"OF TOPSOIL.ALL MULCHING,FERTILIZING,MOWING,ETC.)OF THE PLANTING AND LAWN LANDSCAPE BED AREAS ARE TO RECEIVE 6"OF TOPSOIL. AREAS UNTIL THE WORK IS ACCEPTED IN TOTAL BY THE OWNER.20.REFER TO SPECIFICATIONS FOR ALL INFORMATION NEEDED FOR 10.THE CONTRACTOR SHALL COMPLETELY GUARANTEE ALL PLANT IMPLEMENTATION OF PLANTING PLANS. MATERIAL FOR A PERIOD OF ONE (1)YEAR BEGINNING ON THE DATE 21.ALL LANDSCAPED AREAS ARE TO BE WATERED VIA AUTOMATIC OF TOTAL ACCEPTANCE.THE CONTRACTOR SHALL PROMPTLY MAKE IRRIGATION SYSTEM. ALL REPLACEMENTS BEFORE OR AT THE END OF THE GUARANTEE 22.INSTALL A WEED BARRIER IN ALL LANDSCAPE BED AREAS (SEE PERIOD.11.AFTER BEING DUG AT THE NURSERY SOURCE,ALL TREES IN LEAF SHALL BE ACCLIMATED FOR TWO (2)WEEKS UNDER A MIST SYSTEM PRIOR TO INSTALLATION. 12.ANY PLANT MATERIAL WHICH DIES, (PRIOR TO TOTAL ACCEPTANCE REMOVED FROM THE SITE AND SAME SPECIES,QUANTITY,AND SPECIFICATIONS. TURNS BROWN,OR DEFOLIATES OF THE WORK)SHALL BE PROMPTLY REPLACED WITH MATERIAL OF THE SIZE AND MEETING ALL PLANT LIST SPECIFICArlONS). 2&A 4"X6"CONCRETE HEADERBoARD (SEE DETAIL SHEEr)SHALL BE INSTALLED BETWEEN (SOD OR HYDROSEED)AND LANDSCAPE PLANTING BEDS.ALSO, WOOD HEAD[ABOARD SHALL BE INSTALLED BETWEEN GRAVELED OR ROCKED AREAS AND LANDSCAPE AREAS (BED OR GRASSED 2&PARKING LOT PLANTERS SHALL BE BEAMED AT A 5:1 SLOPE. THERE SHALl BE A 1.5"CURB REVEAL ALONG THE BACK EDGE OF CURB TO PREVENT MULCH FROM SLUFFING ONTO PAVEMENT. LANDSCAPE &IRRIGATION ALL GRASSED AREAS A CALL 48 HOURS BEFORE YOU DIG N -800-424- [.03NE-% 40%PLAN SET Z ORIGINAL ISSUE DATE: Z 01/17/06 PERMIT SET ISSUE DATE: CONSTRUCTION SET ISSUE DATE: DRAWING NUMBER: PL-1.0 z >-mowNz ! v PARTIES OF RECORD LOWE'S OF RENTON LUA05-161,SA-H,SA-M,ECF Mike Neer PACLAND 11235 SE 6th Street ste:#220 Bellevue,WA 98004 tel:425-453-9501 (contact) Jim Manion Lowe's HIW 1530 Faraday Avenue ste:#140 Carlsbad,CA 92008 tel:760-804-5308 (applicant) Dash-80,L.P. 440 N First Street ste:#200 San Jose,CA 95112 (owner) Ron Levine Building Control Systems 21218 66th Avenue NW Lynnwood,WA 98036 Updated:07/11/06 (Page 1 of 1) W mW rr uJ ®09 'of Z 0 w rr"o<._0 zz gd 'i o-q=q=o Illllll 0 < ow z o z o<Dz m eemm zm o °zmooNz S J =o wmo< z,o u-°o <o o- zz oWooz g }Ez :::)zo•(J oo :< o z o w < J,8 ooz o q zW5*NOZ O 8 5 < un ouw o J z'o <o z<W,r,o >.w <:, ;-.8 <Z °o :@'"":-"!-!i ,L dE£:#--900 '6[unr 6P'300O'INa\S6,J!OSQZ,\N upJOS3Oq\NOIN3a\uo5u!qso,v,\:9 ;',""'I,-' o % -e-4 . i j!:,; 'ri I' I LU rrLLl Luo LIOmr "........ii I U.I Z . o o °9;Oi-9 '6L u O,'ALIBOLOINI\S6UOOZXxN V uaP°OX,SOl\NOll\UOlSUfiot\, t f 7 :,o, •] .>! NO'LgNIHSVM'NOJ-NII J l ]NOJ-NII I I I.o s,ol I I I '' s,ON OVN,,,o o,s oIII n° >. iiE ,. o o. >_. . o i! o r ¸¸....,-.,.....-v zj±,,L,\,,~_.,.t o • 1 ll..l ......<........ll.i-'IJ'olll ....im..ml.lll' VNtlll'13ldllLiil . Z 0I:::: 0 ri- m o B-F w o CO Z ,_1 n.-wzLU I I§ z io!itlII ii!i Fill I1,,'"N°--'N°'i'I'ilt NO/N:II::II l lol o,,_.0 ._:oM'3o 'l'il os,o ° II!l ,I,l,,I I I Ill ,,i1.1 I i I i I I I " ililli!!!ll,i l ii!iill:lli ii !Ii i lillili!,:I Ih ..,i !.f Iii i I,I,t !!.1!!Ii '.'1 I 1 1 ,;,;,,!ll41,1i-I Ill t I I II tl I IIIil I i'Iil ill Il il II ''l ll ,lli dill !i ll.,',h,l,,,i,,.,.,h!li,,,I,....t,l,I hhl ,/h i,.,,,.,,,,!I,llltl I,,,llll'.l,it,!l It .!Llll !ll I,,i'lli!,.I !!Iili1ilillil!li iii lilhiiill ,I.1 I IlliiIIi qlll II1 llllll!!l..miiilllUlllhlillltlllliliiiIiiiIilliittlll!l]llt!l'lllllllllllllililllll ii| ,r 7............................_m_...........mo,OL m ....,m,,.,,,............._..,.,___m__m:I .,,1?7..,.it ,< Illll 1 'LI.U.,,iU U II F-i...................f "0 t]-s-',•:I i i i [I i I I 7i+.:,._..-_.-.-,....................I.................!...............,...................................................."!.......'!'il I /7l/i !!i I .."I " ,./1 i i I i i [I ,1/I--4-...................................................I .............................................................+L II............_i i i 'I .!..............i { [..........F ..............................i .............................................................................. ::i i! ll z ,UE:30EO5£ m --,s °o,i i!]ilj,llLILI •>TIIT!7 F41 \,}z o ....I !, ®................i ................................................."......I-- JiJi S33NmH3 -SV'DNI '30SS I I °°'"o-1Ios,3o71 °,I1i.................I il'tt - J i'!!,]i it' I] o o I i ......,--....... o!,'.... '/I "t ''""" -.j] i'!I I ]!iliH "="'iliio.o I="°'=^'%IIA%=ll <" ,,><,1ii c,,I i7 ii =< !i i"l - z_o w B ,S .P LOT 2ili I ' ,, ,m s i_,_._.................N........4 ......SW-->-....r.............................."-#-t i LEGEND KROLL MAPCOMPANY.Ih..mTTI.E o L A K E 0 Hi 0 L A N D IIN _,./8TH ii t..l w Iii Iiii I !i!! I I I i -!I ill '''= i=I li!I;A-,!,"i11,-,i =o' i !'!o ii'=io oliii'*i! c \ \ m Lr--0 o" Z ,!I IIIIiiiiI'lilt ! I -I GARDEN AVE.N.o, ,,=,, 0m o __,,I,..........................,.;'I.....,,=..I,llli.l,II NOIONIHSVM NO±N3II I I .Iz()=llJ;.l|',|ll qlilllllq II NO.I.M::Iu I 1 I 0 /f I' 4" Lowe's of Renfo.Conditions of Development (Summa:p:LUA05-161 Project Condition Haul hours are limited from 8:30 am to 3:30 pm Monday through Friday Within 30 days of completion of grading work the applicant shall hydroseed or plant appropriate vegetation. Construction hours are from 7:00 am to 8:00 pm Monday through Friday and 9:00 am to 8:00 pm on Saturday and no work is allowed on Sundays. The project shall be designed to comply with the Department of Ecology's (DOE)Erosion and Sediment Control Requirements,outlined inVolumeIIofthe2001 Stormwater Management Manual.Erosion and sediment control measures shall be installed and maintained to the satisfaction of the representative of the Development Services Division for the duration of the project's construction. The applicant shall comply with the recommendations of the geotechnical engineering report prepared by GeoEngineers,Inc., dated January 26,2006,regarding earthwork and soil compaction,design of foundations,floor slabs and retaining walls, structural fill,drainage, paving,and utilities. Source of Condition Code Code Code ERC ERC When Compliance is Required During Construction During Project Construction During Project Construction During Construction During Construction Party Responsible Applicant/ Contractor/Builder Applicant/ Contractor/Builder Applicant/ Contractor/Builder Applicant/Contracto r/Builder ApplicantJContracto r/Builder Notes ,,IP Lowe's of Rento,,Conditions of Development (Summa:LUA05-161 The pilings to be located along Garden Avenue N shall be augercast piles or driven steel pipe piles that extend through the liquefiable/com pressible upper alluvial deposits and bear on the lower alluvial deposits to protect the stormwater pipe. The project shall be designed to comply with the 2001 Department of Ecology Stormwater Management Manual for water quality. Pay Transportation Mitigation Fee Pay Fire Mitigation Fee Information shall be provided regarding the proposed landscaping within the 20-foot stormwater easement to the east of Garden Avenue N that would ensure the existing stormwater pipe would not be damaged and that the proposed Autumn Flame Maple is a suitable street tree.Or, a revised landscape plan shall be submitted proposing appropriate landscaping that will not damage the stormwater pipe.This shall be submitted to the Development Services Division project manager for review and approval prior to the issuance of a building permit. ERC ERC ERC ERC During Construction Utility Plan Review Prior to the issuance of Building Permit Prior to the issuance of Building Permit Applicant/Contracto r/Builder Applicant/Contracto r Applicant Applicant Hearing Examiner Condition Building Permit Application Applicant Hearing Prior to issuance of ApplicantArevisedlandscapeplanExaminerbuildingpermitsshallbesubmittedwith $85,837.50 $75,420.80 0 (-. Lowe's of Rento Conditions of Development (Summa y)LUA05-161 the building permit application showing the minimum 751 shrubs required within the parking area.The revised landscape plan shall be submitted to the Development Services Division project manager for review and approval. A revised site plan shall be submitted showing all of the proposed driveways at a maximum width of 30 feet,or a modification to the maximum driveway standards shall be requested.The revised site plan or modification request shall be submitted to the Development Services Division Project Manager for review and approval with the building permit application. A lighting plan shall be submitted with the building permit application for review and approval by the Development Services Division project manager. Condition Hearing Examiner Condition Hearing Examiner Condition Prior to issuance of building permits Prior to issuance of Building Permit Applicant Applicant AFFIDAVIT OF SERVICE BY MAILING STATE OF WASHINGTON ) ) County of King ) SS. Nancy Thompson being first duly sworn,upon oath,deposes and states: That on the 8th day of August 2006,affiant deposited via the United States Mail a sealed envelope(s)containing a decision or recommendation with postage prepaid,addressed to the parties of record in the below entitled application or petition. Signature: SUBSCRIBED AND SWORN to before me this 'L_day of .b,',.,,,x?...'.ll n "---'"--T A--%Jlt % ?"/'-,2006. e gnUb lic in,xf°tate,°hWeashi.ngt°n Application,Petition or Case No.:Lowe's of Renton LUA 05-161,SA-H,SA-M,ECF The Decision or Recommendation contains a complete list ofthe Parties ofRecord. HEARING EXAMINER'S REPORT August 8,2006 OFFICE OF THE HEARING EXAMINER CITY OF RENTON Minutes APPLICANT:Jim Manion Lowe's HIW 1530 Faraday Ave.,Ste.140 Carlsbad,CA 92008 OWNER:Dash-80,L.P. 440 N 1 st Street,Ste.200 San Jose,CA 95112 CONTACT:Mike Neer PACLAND 11235 SE 6 St.,Ste.220 Bellevue,WA 98004 Lowe's ofRenton File No.:LUA 05-161,SA-H,SA-M,ECF LOCATN:800 Garden Avenue North SUMMARY OF REQUEST:Applicant requested Master Plan,Site Plan approval,and Environmental Review,for a Lowe's Home Improvement retail store,garden area and parking spaces. SUMMARY OF ACTION:Development Services Recommendation:Approve with conditions DEVELOPMENT SERVICES REPORT:The Development Services Report was received by the Examiner on July 11,2006. PUBLIC HEARING:After reviewing the Development Services Report,examining available information on file with the application,field checking the property and surrounding area;the Examiner conducted a public hearing on the subject as follows: MINUTES Thefollowing minutes are a summary ofthe July 18,2006 hearing. The legal record is recorded on CD. The hearing opened on Tuesday,July 18,2006,at 9:02 a.m.in the Council Chambers on the seventh floor ofthe Renton City Hall.Parties wishing to testify were affirmed by the Examiner. The following exhibits were entered into the record: Lowe's of Renton / File No.:LUA-05-161,SA-H,SA-M,ECF August 8,2006 Page 2 @ °4 Exhibit No.1:Yellow file containing the original application,proof of posting,proof of publication and other documentation pertinent to this request. Exhibit No.3: Plan Exhibit No.5: Preliminary Grading and Drainage Preliminary Landscape Plan Exhibit No.7:Floor Plan Exhibit No.2:Neighborhood Map Exhibit No.4:Preliminary Utilities Plan Exhibit No.6:Exterior Elevations Exhibit No.8:Zoning Map The hearing opened with a presentation of the staffreport by Jill Ding,Senior Planner,Development Services, City of Renton,1055 S Grady Way,Renton,Washington 98055.The subject property is located west of Houser Way N and east of Garden Avenue N,it is north of North 8 Street.There is a short plat being processed on the subject property and so Lowe's is actually directly north ofthe Fry's site.The property is located within the Urban Center North -1 (UC-N1)zoning designation and comprehensive plan designation.The total size of the subject property is approximately 21 acres,however,after the short plat the subject site would be approximately 9.8 acres in area.The proposal is to construct a new 129,342 square foot Lowe's building with a Garden Center of approximately 26,220 square feet and 411 surface parking stalls. The Environmental Review Committee issued a Determination ofNon-Significance -Mitigated with 6 mitigation measures.No appeals were filed. Master Plan Criteria: The UC-N1 zoning requires a Master Plan approvalprior to approval ofthe Site Plan.The plan would implement the vision of the UCN-1 comprehensive plan designation with the construction of a Lowe's retail building.The design is an urban concept and consistent within the site with modulation and articulation of building design.Landscaping would be provided throughout the site in the parking area and around the perimeter.A pedestrian connection has been provided to Garden Avenue and through the center of the parking lot to the Fry's site to the south.The site further provides focal points through the use ofprominent architectural features to show entrances and to break up the monotony of large blank walls.The proposal is consistent with the Master Plan criteria. Site Plan Criteria: The site is consistent with the UC-N1 land use elements and policies in the plan.The project is in compliance with the lot coverage requirements for this zoning designation.Due to a 20-foot wide easement along Garden Avenue N and 30-foot wide easement along Park Avenue N,it is not possible for Lowe's to comply with the maximum front and side yard along street setback requirements.Therefore,the proposed 15 foot 8 inch front yard setback and the minimum 30-foot side yard along a street setback are approved. The UC-N1 zone requires that all setback areas from a public street be landscaped and that truck docking and loading areas be screened from public streets.Parking lots with 100 or more stalls requires 35 square feet landscaping per parking space.Street trees would be installed within the landscape strip at a rate of 1 tree for every 30 feet of lineal frontage along a street.One tree for every six parking spaces is also required in the parking area and shrubs at the rate of five per 100 square feet and ground cover needs to have a 90%coverage after three years. Lowe's of Renton File No.:LUA-05-161,SA-H,SA-M,ECF August 8,2006 Page 3 There is a 72-inch stormwater discharge pipe beneath the proposed landscape strip.Therefore the applicant should provide information regarding the landscaping which would ensure the pipe would not be damaged and that the proposed trees are suitable street trees or a revised landscape plan proposing landscaping that will not damage the stormwater pipe. The proposed building would have a height of 1 story with a maximum height of 46 feet,which is well below the maximum permitted and is in compliance with this development standard.The various sections ofthe building are at varied heights,which helps reduce the bulk and scale of the structure. The proposed site plan indicates that a total of 411 parking stalls would be provided and that complies with the parking requirements.In the UC-N1 zone parking stalls are required to measure 9 feet in width by 19 feet in length for standard stalls and 8.5 feet in width by 16 feet in length for compact stalls.Some stalls are below the 19-foot requirement,however they are along the walkway with no landscaping so they would be permitted the 2-foot overhang in that location. Two driveways are proposed along the Garden Avenue N street frontage and one driveway to access off of Houser Way N.The northern driveway off of Garden Avenue N is proposed to be 35 feet wide and the southern driveway off of Garden Avenue N is proposed to be 35 feet wide,both driveways off of Garden Avenue N would provide access to the Lowe's parking lot. It is not anticipated that the proposed Lowe's retail store would adversely impact the surrounding properties. The additional retail uses would potentially increase the amount of activity in the area.The scale,height and bulk of the proposed building are appropriate for the site and are anticipated to be architecturally compatible with future development in the vicinity.The applicant requested a modification from the refuse area requirements,they will be using trash compactors therefore,that modification was granted on July 11,2006. The building has been designed to allow for adequate light and air circulation through the site.Exterior onsite lighting,including security and parking lighting is regulated by the City's Code.There should be no problems with any lighting,however,a lighting plan should be submitted with the building permit application. Police and Fire Departments have indicated existing facilities are adequate to accommodate the proposal subject to the payment of a Fire Mitigation fee prior to the issuance of building permits. A Storm Drainage report was submitted and it has been reviewed and found to be in compliance with the 1990 King County Surface Water Design Manual.However,the ERC has imposed a mitigation measure requiring the project to comply with the 2001 Department of Ecology Stormwater Management Manual for water quality improvements. Mike Neer,PACLAND,11235 SE 6th Street,Ste.220,Bellevue,WA 98004 stated that he is an engineer with PACLAND and site development consultant for this project.The correct acreage for the site is 9.79. Regarding the building setback,they would like to make it an even 15 feet rather than 15 feet 8 inches.With reference to the landscaping and trees that they are planning to use,they do have a landscape expert on staff and they are willing to work with the City for the appropriate trees to use in that location. The shared driveway between Lowe's and Fry's will be shared equally by both companies.Both sides will need an easement for the joint access.Both sides will be 35 feet or 36 feet,whichever staff prefers.Access to Houser Way is 20-feet wide and will be solely for delivery truck access. Lowe's ofRenton File No.:LUA-05-161,SA-H,SA-M,ECF August 8,2006 Page 4 © Laura Orlich,22121 17th Avenue SE,Ste.225,Bothell,WA 98021 stated that she was a project architect with SSOE.The floorplan for this site is a custom design with deviations from the typical layout for Lowe's.The Garden center is typically along the side ofthe building as opposed to coming out in the front of the building. There will also be larger general contractor parking spaces in front for the larger vehicles that come to load materials. Kavren Kittrick,Development Services stated that regarding the trees and easement,the water department is amenable to talking about the trees or maybe using planters of some sort.It is just a matter of keeping the integrity of the pipe. The Examiner called for further testimony regarding this project.There was no one else wishing to speak,and no further comments from staff.The hearing closed at 9:52 am. FINDINGS CONCLUSIONS &RECOMMENDATION Having reviewed the record in this matter,the Examiner now makes and enters the following: FINDINGS: . . , . 5. . . 8. . The applicant,Jim Manion representing Lowe's Home Improvement,filed a request for a Master Plan and Site Plan. 10. The yellow file containing the staff report,the State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA)documentation and other pertinent materials was entered into the record as Exhibit #1. The Environmental Review Committee (ERC),the City's responsible official issued a Determination of Non-Significance -Mitigated (DNS-M). The subject proposal was reviewed by all departments with an interest in the matter. The subject site is located at 800 Garden Avenue North.The subject site is immediately south ofNorth Park Drive and bounded on the east by Houser Way North.Fry's Electronics shares the south end of the block. The map element of the Comprehensive Plan designates the area in which the subject site is located as suitable for the development of urban uses under the "Urban Center North"designation,but does not mandate such development without consideration of other policies ofthe Plan. The subject site is currently zoned UC-N1 (Urban Center North -1). The subject site was annexed to the City with the adoption ofOrdinance 1793 enacted in September 1959. The subject site now consists of the proposed Lowe's location as well as the existing Fry's location and is approximately 21.37 acres in size.A short plat is being reviewed and if approved would result in the Lowe's parcel being approximately 9.79 acres of 426,333 square feet. The essentially flat parcel is vacant.The site was part of the Boeing complex and served as a parking lot,which explains why it is paved. Lowe's ofRenton File No.:LUA-05-161,SA-H,SA-M,ECF August 8,2006 Page 5 11. 12. 13. 14. 15. 16. 17. The applicant proposes developing 155,564 square feet of retail and garden center space.The main store would be 129,342 square feet and the garden center would be 26,222 square feet.Associated parking for customers would provide 411 surface parking stalls. 18. The proposed main building will be almost square and generally take up the width ofthe north portion of the approximately 9-acre parcel.The garden center will be located along the eastern edge of the lot merging with the southeast comer of the main building.The applicant indicated that this is a new, custom floor plan highlighting the garden center.The store's two entrances will be at the comer where the garden center meets the store and along the south facade west of the garden center. 19. The zone permits 90%lot coverage and a ten-story building.The applicant proposes approximately 36.5 percent lot coverage and a one-story,albeit,46 foot tall building.The loading dock for trucks would be along the north side ofthe building near the eastern comer while a staging area would be located along the north side at the western comer of the building.The zone also requires a minimum front yard and side yard along a street to be zero feet or a maximum of five feet.The Director of Development Services issued a determination allowing larger setbacks without a variance.A 20-foot wide easement exists along Garden (west)and a 30-foot wide easement along Park (north)for utilities, which restricts what may be constructed within the easements.The applicant had proposed a 15 foot 8 inch (revised to 15 feet at the hearing)front yard setback along Garden and a 30-foot side yard along Park.Both frontages would be landscaped and the loading dock at the north end of the building will be screened. The landscaping will range from approximately 11 feet deep to 15 feet deep nearer the building.Staff raised concern about the nature of the proposed landscaping adjacent or over the easement areas.There is a potential for roots to disrupt utility lines located in the easements and there was also a concem that low branches could interfere with sidewalk usage.Staff will want to review the proposed materials. The parking lot landscaping requires 35 square feet for each parking stall or a minimum of 14,385 square feet of landscaping and the applicant has proposed 15,013 square feet with 77 trees and supplemental shrubs.Shrubs must account for 751 and the applicant provided 641. The applicant would be entitled to develop a maximum of 532 parking spaces but has proposed 411, which is permitted.The stalls will have to meet City standards for dimensions and allotment ofregular, compact and ADA compliant stalls. The main building will use concrete masonry units with horizontal banding,pylaster columns and the entrances will have additional detailing and a canopy near the lumber section.The building will be painted or finished with Lowe's "logo"paint and trim detailing. There will be two driveways along Garden with the south driveway being shared with Fry's.There will be a driveway along Houser to the east for access to the truck loading area along Park.The driveways will have to meet City standards. The development will increase traffic approximately 3,815 new average daily trips with approximately 320 peak hour trips. The applicant will be meeting the 1990 King County Surface Water Design Manual requirements and the 2001 Department of Ecology Stormwater Management Manual for erosion control standards. CONCLUSIONS: Lowe's of Renton ' File No.:LUA-05-161,SA-H,SA-M,ECF August 8,2006 Page 6 © Those criteria are generally represented in part by the following enumeration: 1.General Review Criteria for both Master Plan and Site Plan Review: a. b. C. d. e. f. g. h. i. j. Conformance with the Comprehensive Plan,its elements,goals,objectives,and policies.In determining compliance with the Comprehensive Plan,conformance to the objectives and policies of the specific land use designation shall be given consideration over citywide objectives and policies; Conformance with existing land use regulations; Mitigation of impacts to surrounding properties and uses; Mitigation of impacts ofthe proposed site plan to the site; Conservation of area wide property values; Safety and efficiency of vehicle and pedestrian circulation; Provision of adequate light and air; Mitigation of noise,odors and other harmful or unhealthy conditions; Availability ofpublic services and facilities to accommodate the proposed use;and Prevention ofneighborhood deterioration and blight. 2.Additional Special Review Criteria for COR,UC-N1,and UC-N2 Zones Only: a. b. C° d. e. f. g. h. i. The plan is consistent with a Planned Action Ordinance,if applicable; The plan creates a compact,urban development that includes a compatible mix ofuses that meets the Comprehensive Plan vision and policy statements for the Commercial/Office/Residential or Urban Center North Comprehensive Plan designations; The plan provides an overall urban design concept that is internally consistent,and provides quality development; The plan incorporates public and private open spaces to provide adequate areas for passive and active recreation by the occupants/users ofthe site,and/or to protect existing natural systems; The plan provides view corridors to the shoreline area and Nit.Rainier where applicable; Public access is provided to water and/or shoreline areas; The plan provides distinctive focal points such as public area plazas,prominent architectural features,or other items; Public and/or private streets are arranged in a layout that provide reasonable access to property and support the land use envisioned;and The plan accommodates and promotes transit,pedestrian,and other alternative modes of transportation. 3.Additional Criteria for the UC-N1 and UC-N2 Zones Only: a. b. C. The plan conforms to the approved conceptual plan required by development agreement for the sub-area in question,if applicable. The plan conforms to the intent and the mandatory elements of the design guidelines located in RMC 4-3-100.The Master Plan clearly identifies the urban design concept for each district enunciated in the Urban Center North Comprehensive Plan policies. The proposed interconnected circulation network must demonstrate the function and location ofrequired circulation elements required in RMC 4-3-100.Internal or local roads shall provide adequate edges and buffers to parking lots.A sufficient number of Lowe's of Renton File No.:LUA-05-161,SA-H,SA-M,ECF August 8,2006 Page 7 d. e. roads shall provide adequate edges and buffers to parking lots.A sufficient number of pedestrian-oriented streets are designated to implement the vision for each district in the Urban Center North Comprehensive Plan designation. Gateways are designated consistent with the Comprehensive Plan and conceptual plans for the gateway demonstrate the design concept for gateway treatment and identify significant gateway features to be provided. The Master Plan includes a sequencing element that explains what phases of the Master Plan will be built-out first,and in what order the phases will be built,and an estimated time frame. .The proposed retail complex is supported by the comprehensive plan,which calls for urban scale uses including businesses that cater to consumer demands. .The building meets the bulk standards set forth in the Zoning Code.Due to the easements along both Garden and Park Avenues,the applicant has proposed a more generous setback since buildings and certain structures cannot be located over or near large-scale utility lines. Compliance with both specific Building and Fire Code regulations will be determined when specific building plans are submitted. .The development of the proposed use should not have any untoward impacts on surrounding development although there will be increased automotive traffic both from patrons ofthe business and from delivery trucks.The building will be setback from the street due to the easements along Garden and Park providing more visual separation.The building's exterior treatment should also relieve or mitigate any bulk appearance with banding and pylasters providing breaks in the long facades ofthe building.While the building will be approximately 46 feet tall,buildings up to ten stories are permitted.The building should not block light and air from entering surrounding properties. .The complex will have the required landscaping although the applicant will have to increase some aspects of the landscaping to meet code requirements in the parking lots and may have to alter species or varieties to avoid interference with either the utility easements or pedestrian sidewalks. .The proposed use should not generate any harmful noise,odors or glare.Construction noise should be short-lived and is always a consequence ofnew construction. 9.Public services are available to serve the proposed use. 10.Redevelopment of the abandoned parking lot should prevent urban deterioration or blight. 11.No Planned Action Ordinance is applicable to the proposed development. 12.The proposed use is self-sufficient although in the main,home improvement stores are large, one-story facilities that are designed to meet the shopping needs ofits clientele and are not necessarily compact urban designs. 13.The design is internally consistent and provides both vehicular and pedestrian links to the surrounding community.It will share driveways and potentially parking with it neighboring retail store. Lowe's ofRenton ./ File No.:LUA-05-161,SA-H,SA-M,ECF August 8,2006 Page 8 14.The site is landscaped but retail stores generally do not provide much additional public space. Its location does not require view corridors to surrounding amenities or shorelines. 15.Architectural features ofthe design are intended to moderate the bulk appearance but,again, this store is not intended as a public focal point. 16.While public transit is located near the site and pedestrian connections to sidewalks are provided,the nature ofmany of the products provided by the proposed use are not intended for carry-out sales. 17.In conclusion,the proposed use fits many of the design criteria and other criteria ofthe Site Plan and Master Plan requirements but clearly its products and services are utilitarian items or large- scale items and the design is geared to providing patrons with reasonable access to those products and services. DECISION: The proposed Master Plan and Site Plan are approved subject to the following conditions: .Information shall be provided regarding the proposed landscaping within the stormwater easement to the east of Garden Avenue N that would ensure the existing stormwater pipe would not be damaged and that the proposed Autumn Flame Maple is a suitable street tree.Or,a revised landscape plan shall e submitted proposing appropriate landscaping that will not damage the stormwater pipe.This shall be submitted to the Development Services Division project manager for review and approval prior to the issuance of a building permit. .A revised landscape plan shall be submitted with the building permit application showing the minimum 751 shrubs required within the parking area.The revised landscape plan shall be submitted to the Development Services Division project manager for review and approval. .A revised site plan shall be submitted showing all ofthe proposed driveways at a maximum width of 30-feet,or a modification ofthe maximum driveway standards shall be requested.The revised site plan or modification request shall be submitted to the Development Services Division Project Manger for review and approval with the building permit application. ,A lighting plan shall be submitted with the building permit application for review and approval by the Development Services Division project manager. ORDERED THIS 8th day of August 2006. Lowe's of Renton File No.:LUA-05-161,SA-H,SA-M,ECF August 8,2006 Page 9 TRANSMITTED THIS 8th day ofAugust 2006 to the parties ofrecord: Jill Ding 1055 S Grady Way Renton,WA 98055 Kayren Kittrick Development Services Div. Renton,WA 98056 Laura Orlich SSOE 22121 17th Ave SE,Ste.225 Bothell,WA 98021 Dash-80,LP 440 N 1 st Street,Ste.200 San Jose,CA 95112 Mike Neer PACLAND 11235 SE 6th St.,Ste.220 Bellevue,WA 98004 Jim Manion Lowe's HIW 1530 Faraday Ave.,Ste.140 Carlsbad,CA 92008 TRANSMITTED THIS 8th day ofAugust 2006 to the following: Mayor Kathy Keolker Jay Covington,ChiefAdministrative Officer Julia Medzegian,Council Liaison Gregg Zimmerman,PBPW Administrator Alex Pietsch,Economic Development Jennifer Henning,Development Services Stacy Tucker,Development Services King County Journal Stan Engler,Fire Larry Meckling,Building Official Planning Commission Transportation Division Utilities Division Neil Watts,Development Services Janet Conklin,Development Services Pursuant to Title IV,Chapter 8,Section 100Gofthe City's Code,request for reconsideration must be filed in writing on or before 5:00 p.m.August 22 2006.Any aggrieved person feeling that the decision of the Examiner is ambiguous or based on erroneous procedure,errors of law or fact,error in judgment,or the discovery of new evidence which could not be reasonably available at the prior hearing may make a written request for a review by the Examiner within fourteen (14)days from the date ofthe Examiner's decision.This request shall set forth the specific ambiguities or errors discovered by such appellant,and the Examiner may, after review of the record,take further action as he deems proper. An appeal to the City Council is governed by Title IV,Chapter 8,Section 110,which requires that such appeal be filed with the City Clerk,accompanying a filing fee of $75.00 and meeting other specified requirements. Copies ofthis ordinance are available for inspection or purchase in the Finance Department,first floor of City Hall.An appeal must be filed in writing on or before 5:00 p.m.August 22 2006. If the Examiner's Recommendation or Decision contains the requirement for Restrictive Covenants,the executed Covenants will be required prior to approval by City Council or final processing of the file.You may contact this office for information on formatting covenants. The Appearance of Faimess Doctrine provides that no ex parte (private one-on-one)communications may occur concerning pending land use decisions.This means that parties to a land use decision may not communicate in private with any decision-maker concerning the proposal.Decision-makers in the land use process include both the Hearing Examiner and members of the City Council. All communications concerning the proposal must be made in public.This public communication permits all interested parties to know the contents of the communication and would allow them to openly rebut the evidence.Any violation of this doctrine would result in the invalidation of the request by the Court. Lowe's of Renton . File No.:LUA-05-161,SA-H,SA-M,ECF August 8,2006 Page 10 © The Doctrine applies not only to the initial public hearing but to all Requests for Reconsideration as well as Appeals to the City Council. / Z UC-NI Z b. 0 ..............C-N l1t JZ N th St. F4 *17 TZ3N RSE W 1/Z 8 TZ3N RSE W 112 5308 Oo®@®o®o c, v O 3.ERC MITIGATION MEASURES Based on an analysis of probable impacts from the proposed project,the following mitigation measureswereissuedfortheDeterminationofNon-Significance -Mitigated: 1.The project shall be designed to comply with the Department of Ecology's (DOE)Erosion and Sediment Control Requirements,outlined in Volume II of the 2001 Stormwater Management Manual. Erosion and sediment control measures shall be installed and maintained to the satisfaction of the representative of the Development Services Division for the duration of the project's construction. 2.The applicant shall comply with the recommendations of the geotechnical engineering report prepared by GeoEngineers,Inc.,dated January 26,2006,regarding earthwork and soil compaction,design of foundations,floor slabs and retaining walls,structural fill,drainage,paving,and utilities. 3.The pilings to be located along Garden Avenue N shall be augercast piles or driven steel pipe piles that extend through the liquefiable/compressible upper alluvial deposits and bear on the lower alluvialdepositstoprotectthestormwaterpipe. 4.The project shall be designed to comply with the 2001 Department of Ecology Stormwater Management Manual for water quality. 5.The applicant shall pay a Transportation Mitigation Fee of $85,837.50 for the propesed 3,815 new average daily tdps that will be generated by theproposed development.Fees are subject to change and are payable prior to the issuance of a building permit. •6.The applicant shall pay a Fire Mitigation Fee of $0.52 per square foot,for a current estimated total of $75,420.80.Fees are subject to change and are payable prior to the issuance of building permits. CITY ,.JF RENTON [+l )+]Planning/Building/PublicWorks Depa.rtment July 18,2006 Mike Neer PACLAND 11235 SE 6th Street #220 Bellevue,WA 98004 Subject: Dear Mr.Neer: Please find prevention. Lowe's of Renton,LUA 05-161,SA-H,SA-M,ECF Police Comments Sincerely, attached comments from the City's police department regarding crime If you have any questions,please contact me at 425-430-7219. CC:File Jim Manion/applicant DASH-80,L.P,/owner Enclosure L ¸,, 1055 South Grady Way -Renton,Washington 98055 o oThisDEIDer:contains50Yo recycled materinl 3(3 Y.nn.qtr'nlJmFr AHEAD OF THE CURVE Kathy Keolker,Mayor July 11,2006 CITY F RENTON Planning/Building/PublicWorks Department Gregg Zimmerman P.E.,Administrator Chris O'Connor,PE SSOE,Inc. 22121 17th Avenue SE,ste.225 Bothell,WA 98021-7405 Subject:Refuse Deposit Area Modification Request for Lowe's of Renton (Renton File No.LUA05-161,SA-H,SA-M,ECF): Dear Mr.O'Connor: The City of Renton is .in receipt of your request for a refuse deposit area modification dated June 19,2006 regarding the property located at 800 Garden Avenue N.The following summarizes your request,project background,analysis and decision. Summary of Request The applicant,Chris O'Connor of SSOE,has requested a modification on behalf of Lowe's from section 4-4-090E Commercial Developments -Additional Requirements for Deposit and Collection Areas.Section 4-4-090E requires that a minimum amount of area be provided for refuse deposit areas.A modification has been requested install a trash compactor at a lower square footage ratio that is required in the refuse and recycling deposit area regulations.The applicant's justification for the request is as follows.: The.proposed Lowe's project is a big boxretail development located within the Urban Center- North 1 (UC-N1)zone.The refuse deposit area requirements for the commercial developments do not take into consideration the possibility for the utilization of a trash .compactor as opposed to standard dumpsters.The refuse requirements would require area for a refuse deposit area that would be under utilized if a trash compactor is used. Section 4-4-090G allows the Development Services Division to grant modifications from the Refuse and Recyclable Deposit Area standards for individual.cases provided that the modification meets the following criteria (pursuant to RMC 4-9-250D2): a.Substantially implements the policy direction of the policies and objectives of the Comprehensive Plan Land Use Element and the Community Design Element and the proposed modification is the minimum adjustment necessary to implement these policies and objectives; b.Will meet the objectives and safety,function,appearance,environmental protection and maintainability intended by the Code requirements,based upon sound engineering judgment; c.Will not be injuriousto other property(s)in the vicinity; d.Conform to the intent and purpose of the Code; e.Can be shown to be justified and required for the use and situation intended;and f.Will not create adverse impacts to other property(s)in the vicinity. 1055 South Grady Way -Renton,Washington 98055 AHEAD OF THE CURVE ALowe's of Renton Refuse Deposit Area Modificaon Page 2 of 3 Back.qround The subject proposal would result in the construction of a 129,342 square foot big box retail store. The City's refuse deposit area standards do not account for the utilization of trash compactors, which would require less area for a refuse deposit area than would a standard dumpster. Section 4-4-090E.5 of the refuse deposit area regulations requires a minimum area for refuse deposit areas based on the gross floor area of the proposed building.In retail developments a minimum of 10 square feet per 1,000 square feet of building gross floor area shall be provided for refuse deposit areas.Based on the proposed 129,342 squai'e foot retail building a refuse area of 1,294 square feet would be required by the City's refuse deposit area regulations.The applicant has proposed a refuse area totaling 684 square feet with an industrial strength trash compactor. Analysis 1 .)Substantially implements the policy direction of the policies and objectives of the Comprehensive Plan Land Use Element and the Community Design Element and the proposed modification is the minimum adjustment necessary to implement these policies and objectives. The proposed modificati0n would allow for a reductionin the area required for a refuse deposit area in exchange for the installation of a trash compactor.The proposed reduction in the refuse area would allow the Lowe's dvelopment to be slightly more compact development,which would provide additional area for commercial development. The proposal to reduce.the refuse area•and create a more consolidated urban development would implementthe ComprehenSive Land Use Element and Community Design Element for the Urban Center North land use designation.The proposed modification is the minimum adjustment necessary to implement these policies and objectives." 2.)Will meet the objectives and safety,funct'ion,appearance,environmental protection and maintainability intended by theCode requirements,based upon sound engineering Judgment. The proposed refuse area reduction in exchange for the utilization of a trash compactor would meet the objectives and safety,function,appearance,environmental protection and maintainability intended by the City's refuse deposit area requirements as the trash compactor would allow Lowe's to dispose of an equivalent level of refuse as would be possible in a larger dumpster as required by Code,but in a smaller area. Will not be injurious to otherproperty(s)in the vicinity. The proposed modification is not injurious to other property(s)in the vicinity because the proPOSed refuse deposit area would utilize a trash compactor,which allows for the disposal of an equivalent volume of refuse as can be stored in a dumpster,but in a smaller area. Conform to the intent and purpose of the Code. The proposed utilization of a trash compactor would reduce the area required for a standard dumpster,but still allow for the disposal of an equivalent level of refuse,which is conforms to the intent and purpose of the Code. Can be shown to be justified and required for the use and situation intended. The proposed reduction in the refuse deposit area required is justified as the applicant has proposed to install a trash compactor.The proposed refuse area would dispose of an 3.). 4.) 5.) Lowe's of Renton Refuse Deposit Area Modification Page3 of 3 equivalent volume of refuse as a standard dumpster area,but a smaller refuse deposit area is required for the trash compactor than a dumpster. 6.)•Will not create adverse impacts to other property(s)in the vicinity. See discussion under number 3 above. Decision The applicant's request for a modification from the refuse deposit area requirements to provide a 684 square foot refuse area with an industrial strength trash compactor is approved, This decision to approve the proposed revisions as a minor modification is subject to a fourteen (14)day appeal period from the date of this letter.Any appeals of the administrative decision must be filed with the City of Renton Hearing Examiner by 5:00 pro,July 25,2006.If you have questions regarding this correspondence feel free to contact Jill Ding at (425)430-7219. Sincerely. Neil Watts ,, Development Services Director Cc LUA05o161 file Mike Neer,Pacland • Jim Manion,Lowe's Dash-80.L.P.,owner Jennifer Henning ,,]/,:;i/-:,';,.i,- ,t T,-.r].. ,!%,i M t,> CITY OF RENTON CURRENT PLANNING DIVISION AFFIDAVIT OF SERVICE BY MAILING On the 11 th day of July,2006,I deposited in the mails of the United States,a sealed envelope containing Preliminary Report to the Hearing Examiner documents.This information was sent to: Name Mike Neer,PACLAND Contact Jim Manion,Lowe's HIW Applicant Dash -80,L.P.Owner Representing (Signature of Sender):Z,#J f";c/STATE OF WASHINGTON )ssCOUNTYOFKING) I certify that I know or have satisfactory evidence that Stacy Tucker signed this instrument and acknowledged it to be his/her/their free and voluntary act for the uses and purposes mentioned in the instrument. Dated:-/-I t-o(_,, Notary (Print): My appointment expires: Project,Name:i /Lowe's of Renton .... Project Number LUA05-161,SA-H,SA-M,ECF COUNCILCHAMBERSi7THFLOOR,;E;PITON:CIHAEE ;i:;:i!,'..:.-.:iI':...... .The:alplication(s).iisted !areiii:order of app!icatibnmumber only and not Dcess:a(iiy;the order in which theyWiil be iheard!:!tems!wiil:becald0rieait g at thed sCtet.°n:i6fthe Heaing Eikmljlne!::.i:.i!II.:.,':::i PROJECT NAME:Lowe's of Renton PROJECT NUMBER:LUA05-161,SA-H,SA-M,ECF PROJECT DESCRIPTION:The applicant is requesting Environmental (SEPA)review,Master Plan and Site Development Plan approvals for a Lowe's Home Improvement retail store totaling 129,342 sq ft,with a garden area totaling 26,222 sq ft and 411 parking spaces.The site would total 9.78- acres after the approval of a proposed short plat (LUA06-080)and is zoned Urban Center North-1 (UNC-1).The property is located at 800 Garden Ave.N at southeast corner of the intersection of Park Ave.N and Garden Ave.NE. PROJECT NAME:Duvall Short Plat PROJECT NUMBER:LUA06-031,SHPL-H PROJECT DESCRIPTION:The applicant is requesting Hearing Examiner Short Plat approval for the subdivision of a 48,647 sq ft (1.17 acre)parcel zoned Residential -8 dwelling units per acre (R-8) into 8 lots intended for the eventual development of detached single-family homes.The proposed lot sizes range from 4,500 to 6,377 sq ft.Access to the proposed lots would be from NE 10th St from a new alley serving Lots 1-6,with direct access via private driveway from Chelan Ave.NE for Lots 7 and 8.An existing shed would be removed.No significant trees are located on the property. HEX Agenda 7-18-06 PUBLIC HEARING City of Renton Department of Planning /Building /Public Works PRELIMINARY REPORT TO THE HEARING EXAMINER A.SUMMARYAND PURPOSE OF REQUEST: Public Hearing Date:July 18,2006 Project Name:Lowe's of Renton Owner::Dash-80,L.P.,440 N.1 st Street,Ste.200,San Jose,CA 95112 Applicant:Jim Manion,Lowe's HIW,1530 Faraday Ave.,Ste.140,Carlsbad,CA 92008 Contact:Mike Neer,PACLAND,11235 SE 6th St.,Ste.220,Bellevue,WA 98004 File Number:LUA-05-161,SA-H,SA-M,ECF Planner:Jill K.Ding,Senior Planner Project Description:The applicant is requesting Environmental (SEPA)review,Master Plan and Site Development Plan approvals for a Lowe's Home Improvement retail store totaling 129,342 sq ft,with a garden area totaling 26,222 sq ft and 411 parking spaces.The site would total 9.78-acres after the approval of a proposed short plat (LUA06-080) and is zoned Urban Center North-1 (UNC-1).The property is located at 800 Garden Ave.N at southeast corner of the intersection of Park Ave.N and Garden Ave.NE. Project Location:800 Garden Ave.N SITE City of Renton P/B/PW Departmen,Preliminary Report to the Hearing ExaminerLOWE'S OF RENTON "LUA-05-161,SA-H,SA-M,ECF PUBLIC HEARING DATE:July 18,2006 B.EXHIBITS Page 2 of 13 Ci The following Exhibit No.1' Exhibit No.2: Exhibit No.3: Exhibit No.4: Exhibit No.5: Exhibit No.6: Exhibit No.7: Exhibit No.8: GENERAL exhibits are entered into the record: Yellow file containing:application,proof of posting and publication,environmental review and other documentation pertinent to this request. Neighborhood Map. Preliminary Grading and Drainage Plan (dated 1/31/2006). Preliminary Utilities Plan (dated 1/31/2006). Preliminary Landscape Plan (dated 1/17/2006). Exterior Elevations (dated 3/1/2006). Floor Plan (dated 3/1/2006). Zoning Map,Sheet E4 west V2 (dated 2/16/2006). INFORMAT/ON: . 2. 3. 4. 5. . 7. 8. Owner of Record: Zoning Designation: Comprehensive PlanLandUseDesignation: Existing Site Use: Neighborhood Characteristics North: Access: East: South: West: Site Area: Project Data: Existing Building Area: New Building Area: Total Building Area: Dash-80,L.P.,440 N.1 st Street,Ste.200,San Jose,CA 95112 Urban Center North -1 (UNC-1) Urban Center-North Vacant (abandoned Boeing parking lot) Boeing property-Urban Center North-2 (UNC-2)and Industrial-Heavy (I-H) Burlington Northern Railroad -Heavy Industrial (IH) Fry's Electronics -zoned Urban Center North-1 (UNC-1) Boeing property-zoned Urban Center North-1 (UNC-1) Via Garden Ave.N from a joint driveway access shared with Fry'sElectronics 9.78 acres after the recording of a proposed short plat being reviewedunderaseparateapplication(LUA06-080) Area comments N/A N/A 129,342 sq ft store and 26,222 sq ft garden center 129,342 sq ft +26,222 sq ft =155,564 sq ft N/A D.HIS TORICAL/BACKGROUND: Action Land Use File No.Ordinance No.DateZoningN/A 5100 11/1/2004 Comprehensive Plan N/A 5099 11/1/2004 Annexation N/A 1793 9/15/1959 E.APPLICABLE SECTIONS OF THE DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS (RMC TITLE IV): 1.Chapter 2 Land Use Districts HEX staff rpt 05-161 .doc City ofRenton P/B/PW Departmen,Preliminary Report to the Hearing Examiner LOWE'S OFRENTON LUA-05-161,SA-H,SA-M,ECF PUBLIC HEARING DATE:July 18,2006 Section 4-2-020:Purpose and Intent of Zoning Districts Section 4-2-070:Zoning Use Table Section 4-2-120.E:Commercial Development Standards 2.Chapter 3 Environmental Regulations and Special Districts Section 4-3-050:Critical Areas Regulations 3.Chapter 4 Property Development Standards Section 4-4-030:Development Guidelines and Regulations -General Section 4-4-070:Landscaping Regulations Section 4-4-080:Parking,Loading,and Driveway Regulations Section 4-4-090:Refuse and Recyclables Standards Section 4-4-095:Screening and Storage Height/Location Limitations 4.Chapter 6 Streets and Utility Standards 5.Chapter 9 Procedures and Review Criteria Section 4-9-200:Site Plan Review 6.Chapter 11 Definitions Page 3 of 13 F.APPLICABLE SECTIONS OF THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN: 1.Land Use Element G.DEPARTMENT ANALYSIS: 1.PROJECT DESCRIPTION/BACKGROUND The project site is within a portion of the area zoned Urban Center North-1 (UNC-1)that was created subsequent to The Boeing Company's surplussing of several historical parking and building areas associated with its Lake Washington facilities.The south portion of the project site is currently developed with Fry's Electronics and associated parking and landscaping improvements.The north portion of the project site is currently vacant,but is completely paved,with lighting and drainage improvements.The proposal would include a new retail store of approximately 129,342 sq ft,an associated garden center of approximately 26,222 sq ft,411 surface parking stalls,and associated infrastructure such as landscaping, water,sewer,and stormwater facilities.The site currently has access from Garden Ave N and Houser Way.The proposed development would provide two commercial driveways onto Garden Ave N,the southern driveway would be a joint use driveway shared with Fry's Electronics.One driveway onto Houser Way N would also be provided. The project site area currently totals 21.37 acres,however a short plat is being reviewed for the site under a separate application (LUA06-080).The purpose of the short plat is to segregate the Lowe's site and any associated parking improvements from the existing Fry's site.Once the proposed short plat is approved and recorded,the Lowe's site would total 426,333 sq.ft.or 9.78 acres in area. The project will require removal of approximately 5,000 cu yd of asphalt (parking lot pavement). Approximately 20,000 cu yd of onsite soil material will be regraded,and approximately 10,000 cu yd of gravel will be imported to construct the sub-base below the proposed building and new parking lot areas. The site is served by City of Renton water and sewer,which would be extended as necessary to serve the proposed development.Stormwater runoff from the site currently drains to existing catch basins on the western side of the site,which ultimately discharges to the public stormwater system in Garden Ave.N. The proposal includes construction of an onsite stormwater collection system for the parking areas that will be filtered prior to offsite discharge,and a rooftop runoff collection system that will bypass the water quality system. No trees,and no wetlands or other environmentally sensitive areas,are located on the site.The proposal includes perimeter and interior landscaping of street frontages and parking lots. HEX staff rpt 05-161.doc City ofRenton P/B/PW DepartmenL Preliminary Report to the Hearing Examiner LOWE'S OF RENTON LUA-05-161,SA-H,SA-M,ECF PUBLIC HEARING DATE."July 18,2006 2.ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW Page 4 of 13 Pursuant to the City of Renton's Environmental Ordinance and SEPA (RCW 43.21C,1971 as amended), on June 27,2006,the Environmental Review Committee issued a Determination of Non-Significance, Mitigated for the project.The DNS-M included 6 mitigation measures.A 14-day appeal period commenced on June 30,2006 and ended on July 14,2006.As of the date of this staff report,no appeals of the threshold determination were filed. 3.ERC MITIGATION MEASURES Based on an analysis of probable impacts from the proposed project,the following mitigation measures were issued for the Determination of Non-Significance -Mitigated: 1.The project shall be designed to comply with the Department of Ecology's (DOE)Erosion and Sediment Control Requirements,outlined in Volume II of the 2001 Stormwater Management Manual. Erosion and sediment control measures shall be installed and maintained to the satisfaction of the representative of the Development Services Division for the duration of the project's construction. .The applicant shall comply with the recommendations of the geotechnical engineering report prepared by GeoEngineers,Inc.,dated January 26,2006,regarding earthwork and soil compaction,design of foundations,floor slabs and retaining walls,structural fill,drainage,paving,and utilities. .The pilings to be located along Garden Avenue N shall be augercast piles or driven steel pipe piles that extend through the liquefiable/compressible upper alluvial deposits and bear on the lower alluvial deposits to protect the stormwater pipe. 4.The project shall be designed to comply with the 2001 Department of Ecology Stormwater Management Manual for water quality. 5.The applicant shall pay a Transportation Mitigation Fee of $85,837.50 for the proposed 3,815 new average daily trips that will be generated by the proposed development.Fees are subject to change and are payable prior to the issuance of a building permit. 6.The applicant shall pay a Fire Mitigation Fee of $0.52 per square foot,for a current estimated total of $75,420.80.Fees are subject to change and are payable prior to the issuance of building permits. 4.STAFF REVIEW COMMENTS Representatives from various city departments have reviewed the application materials to identify and address site plan issues from the proposed development.These comments are contained in the official file,and the essence of the comments has been incorporated into the appropriate sections of this report and the Departmental Recommendation at the end of the report. 5.CONSISTENCY WITH MASTER PLAN APPROVAL CRITERIA The UNC-1 zoning of the development site triggers a requirement to prepare a Master Plan per RMC 4-9- 200.A.1,to be approved prior to or concurrent with Site Plan Approval.RMC 4-9-200.A.1.states that "The purpose of the Master Plan process is to guide phased planning of development projects with multiple buildings on a single large site.The Master Plan is required to demonstrate how the major elements of a development are proposed on the site at sufficient detail to demonstrate the overall project concept.In addition,the Master Plan must illustrate how the major project elements,combined,create an urban environment that implements City goals.An additional purpose is to allow consideration and mitigation of potential impacts that could result from large-scale site and facility development,and to allow coordination with City capital improvement planning." HEX staff rpt 05-161 .doc City of Renton P/B/PW Departmer,Preliminary Report to the Hearing Examiner LOWE'S OF RENTON LUA-05-161,SA-H,SA-M,ECF PUBLIC HEARING DATE:July 18,2006 Page 5 of 13 The following criteria are required to be met through the Site Plan and Master Plan Review Process, consistent with RMC 4-9-200E.2.: (A)The plan is consistent with a Planned Action Ordinance,if applicable. Not applicable,there was no Planned Action Ordinance for the subject property. (B)The plan creates a compact,urban development that includes a compatible mix of uses that meets the Comprehensive Plan vision and policy statements for the Urban Center North Comprehensive Plan designation. The proposed development would result in the construction of a 129,342 square foot retail building with a 26,222 square foot garden center and 411 parking stalls.The proposed project would implement the Comprehensive Plan vision and Urban Center North policy statements as the project would result in the creation of additional retail space on a currently vacant parcel and would also result in the creation of additional jobs.See further discussion below under Conformance with the Comprehensive Plan,its Elements and Policies. (C)The plan provides an overall urban design concept that is internally consistent,and provides quality development. The proposed Lowe's design provides an urban design concept that is internally consistent through the use of modulation and articulation in the building design,landscaping,and a pedestrian connection to Garden Avenue N.The proposed site plan also provides a pedestrian and vehicular connection to the Fry's site,which is south of the proposed Lowe's development. (D)The plan incorporates public and private open spaces to provide adequate areas for passive and active recreation by the occupants/users of the site,and/or to protect existing natural systems. The proposed Lowe's site plan incorporates public and private open spaces through the provision of pedestrian connections within the site and around the site within the Garden Avenue N public right-of-way. The proposed pedestrian spaces would be landscaped with a combination of trees,shrubs,and groundcover as shown on the submitted landscape plans. (E)The plan provides view corridors to the shoreline area and Mt.Rainier where applicable. There are not views of any designated shorelines from the subject property.The proposed building would not obstruct any potential views of Mto Rainier. (F)Public access is provided to water and/or shoreline areas; Not applicable,the site does not abut any water or shoreline areas. HEX staff rpt 05-161 .doc City of Renton P/B/PW Departmen.!Preliminary Report to the Hearing Examiner LOWE'S OF RENTON "LUA-05-161,SA-H,SA-M,ECF PUBLIC HEARING DATE:July 18,2006 Page 6 of 13 (G)The plan provides distinctive focal points such as public area plazas,prominent architectural features,or other items The site plan provides focal points through the use of prominent architectural features that are utilized to distinguish building entrances as well as to break up the monotony of large blank walls.In addition a landscaped walkway is proposed through the center of the parking lot running from the north end of the lot to the south end of the lot where it would eventually connect to the Fry's parking lot. (H)Public and/or private streets are arranged in a layout that provides reasonable access to property and supports the land use envisioned Not applicable,there are no proposed streets within the site. (I)The plan accommodates and promotes transit,pedestrian,and other alternative modes of transportation. The plan accommodates potential pedestrians through the provision of a pedestrian connection from the sidewalk that will be constructed along Garden Avenue N to the building entrance.Transit riders would be accommodated through an existing bus stop located at the northwest corner of the property at the intersection of Garden Avenue N and Park Avenue N. (J)The plan conforms to the approved conceptual plan required by development agreement for the subarea in question,if applicable. Not applicable. (K)The plan conforms with the intent and the mandatory elements of the design guidelines located in RMC 4-3-100.The Master Plan clearly identifies the urban design concept for each district enunciated in the Urban Center North Comprehensive Plan policies. The proposed Lowe's site plan is located outside of the districts to which the design guidelines are applicable.The proposed site plan complies with the Urban Center North Comprehensive Plan policies; see further discussion below under Conformance with the Comprehensive Plan,its Land Use Element & Policies. (L)The proposed interconnected circulation network must demonstrate the function and location of required circulation elements required in RMC 4-3-100.Internal or local roads shall provide adequate edges and buffers to parking lots.A sufficient number of pedestrian-oriented streets are designated to implement the vision for each district in the Urban Center North Comprehensive Plan designation. No internal access roads are proposed with the development.In addition,the site is located outside of the districts which are regulated under RMC 4-3-100,therefore the circulation elements of that section are not required. HEX staff rpt 05-161 .doc City ofRenton P/B/PW Departmen 'Preliminary Report to the Hearing ExaminerLOWE'S OFRENTON LUA-05-161,SA-H,SA-M,ECF PUBLIC HEARING DATE:July 18,2006 Page 7 of 13 (M)Gateways are designated consistent with the Comprehensive Plan and conceptual plans for the gateway demonstrate the design concept for gateway treatment and identify significant gateway features to be provided. Not applicable,no gateways are proposed or required for this project. (N)The Master Plan includes a sequencing element that explains what phases of the Master Plan will be built-out first,and in what order the phases will be built,and an estimated time frame. The proposed site plan would not be constructed in phases;therefore a sequencing element is not applicable. 5.CONSISTENCY WITH SITE PLAN APPROVAL CRITERIA As per RMC 4-9-200.E,the Reviewing Official shall review and act upon site plans based upon comprehensive planning considerations and the following criteria.These criteria are objectives of good site plans to be aimed for in development within the City of Renton.However,strict compliance with any one or more particular criterion may not be necessary or reasonable.These criteria also provide a frame of reference for the applicant in developing a site,but are not intended to be inflexible standards or to discourage creativity and innovation.The site plan review criteria include,but are not limited to,the following: (A)CONFORMANCE WITH THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN,ITS ELEMENTS &POLICIES The Comprehensive Plan Land Use Map designation for the project property is Urban Center North.The purpose of the UC-N is to redevelop industrial land for new office,residential,and commercial uses at a sufficient scale to implement the Urban Centers criteria adopted in the Countywide Planning Policies.This portion of the Urban Center is anticipated to attract large-scale redevelopment greater than that in the Urban Center-Downtown,due to the large available land holdings under single ownership.In addition,this new development is expected to include a wider group of uses including remaining industrial activities, new research and development facilities,laboratories,retail integrated into pedestrian-oriented shopping districts,and a range of urban-scale mixed-use residential,office and commercial uses. The following Comprehensive Plan policies are applicable to the proposal: Land Use Element Poficy LU-272.Support uses that serve the region,a sub-regionaL or citywide market as well as the surrounding neighborhoods.The proposed Lowe's development would at a minimum provide a use that would serve the surrounding neighborhood and possibly a larger citywide market. Policy LU-282,Fully integrate signage,building height,bulk,setbacks,landscaping,and parking considerations in structures and site plans across the various components of each proposed development.The submitted master site plan and site plan materials incorporate signage elements,building height,bulk,setbacks,landscaping,and parking elements.Each of these elements will be reviewed to ensure compliance with City standards. Poficy LU-283.Require significant pedestrian elements in internal site circulation plans.The proposed development includes a landscaped pedestrian walkway through the center of the parking lot,which would connect to the Fry's site located to the south.In addition,a pedestrian connection would be provided from the sidewalk on Garden Avenue N to the entrance of the proposed Lowe's building. HEX staff rpt 05-161 .doc City ofRenton P/B/PW Departmen,Preliminary Report to the Hearing Examiner LOWE'S OFRENTON LUA-05-161,SA-H,SA-M,ECF PUBLIC HEARING DATE:July 18,2006 Page 8 of 13 Policy LU-287.Discourage parking lots between structures and street right-of-way.No parking lots are proposed between the proposed structure and the public right-of-way. Policy LU-308.Support surface parking lots behind buildings,and in the center of blocks, screened from the street by structures with landscape buffers.The proposed surface parking lot would be located in front of the proposed building;however the lot would be located at the center of the block and would not be located between the building and the public street.A landscape plan was submitted with the application materials.The parking lot would be screened with Autumn Flame Maple trees and a variety of shrub species. (B)CONFORMANCE WITH LAND USE REGULATIONS The subject site is zoned Urban Center-North 1 (UC-N1).The UC-N zones were established to provide an area for pedestrian-scale mixed-use development that supports the residential and employment goals of Renton's Urban Center -North.The UC-N1 zone is intended to attract new retail,office,and technology-related uses that co-exist with continued airplane manufacturing in the short run,but provide a standard of development that stimulates further investment and transition of uses in the longer term.Large-scale retail uses are allowed as anchors,which,when combined with smaller pedestrian-oriented development,create a quality regional retail area. Development Standards Lot Coverage -The maximum building lot coverage in the UC-N1 zone is 90%of the total lot area.The building footprint of the proposed Lowe's is !29,342 sq.ft.and the garden center is 26,222 sq.ft.for a total of 155,564 sq.ft.on the 426,333 sq.ft.site results in a 36.5 percent lot coverage.The project is in compliance with this requirement. Setbacks -The UC-N1 zone requires a minimum front yard and side yard along a street setback of 0 feet and a maximum front and side yard along a street setback of 5 feet.However,the Director of Development Services issued a Determination,which states that the maximum front yard and side yard along street setbacks may be altered through the Site Plan Review Process without the need for a variance,which would be consistent with maximum setback requirements applicable in other commercial zoned within the City of Renton.Due to the 20 foot wide easement located along Garden Avenue N and the 30 foot wide easement located along Park Avenue N,it is not possible for the proposed Lowe's building to comply with the maximum front and side yard along a street setback requirements.Therefore,the proposed 15 foot 8 inch front yard setback and the minimum 30 foot side yard along a street setback as shown on the submitted site plan are approved. Landscaping -The UC-N1 zone requires that all setback areas from a public street be landscaped and that truck docking and loading areas be screened from public streets.The City's parking regulations have additional landscaping requirements.The minimum amount of landscaping required for parking lots with 100 or more stalls is 35 sq.ft.per parking space. Where surface lots abut a public right-of-way a minimum 5-foot landscaped strip shall be installed between the parking lot and the public street.Street trees shall be installed within the landscape strip at a rate of 1 tree for every 30 feet of lineal frontage.Within the parking area a minimum of 1 tree shall be planted for every 6 parking spaces provided,shrubs shall be planted at a rate of 5 per 100 sq.ft.of landscape area,ground cover shall be planted in sufficient quantities to provide 90 percent coverage within the first 3 years of installation,and no more than 50 feet shall separate a parking space from a landscape area. The submitted conceptual landscape plan proposes to landscape all setback areas.Along Garden Avenue N a landscape strip is proposed,which ranges in width from 11 feet along the surface parking lot to 15 feet where the proposed building would be constructed.Street trees are proposed within the landscape strip at a spacing of 30 feet on center and would consist of Autumn Flame Maple.Additional shrub and ground cover species are proposed to further vegetate the landscape strip along Garden Avenue N and would provide screening of the building and the surface parking lot from Garden Avenue N.A landscape strip is also proposed along Park Avenue N and would consist largely of Austrian Black Pine and Weeping Alaskan Cedar,which would serve to screen the proposed loading and docking area from Park Avenue N.The parking HEX staff rpt 05-161 .doc City ofRenton P/B/PW Departmen,Preliminary Report to the Hearing ExaminerLOWE'S OF RENTON LUA-05-161,SA-H,SA-M,ECF PUBLIC HEARING DATE:July 18,2006 Page 9 of 13 lot would be landscaped with trees consisting of a mix of Chanticlear Flowering Pear,Columnar Sargent Cherry,and 'Worpelsdon'American Sweetgum and a variety of shrubs and ground cover. Staff has reviewed the submitted conceptual landscape plan.The proposed landscaping along Park Avenue N,would adequately screen the truck docking and loading areas from Park Avenue N,which is in compliance with the City's screening requirements for docking and loading areas. However,staff has concerns with proposed landscaping to be installed along Garden Avenue N due to the presence of a 72-inch stormwater discharge pipe beneath the proposed landscape strip.Staff is unsure if the proposed landscaping would pose a threat to the stormwater pipe.In addition,it appears that the proposed street trees have spreading low branches,which may indicate that the species is not a suitable tree to be located adjacent to a public sidewalk. Therefore,staff recommends as a condition of approval that the applicant provide information regarding the proposed landscaping,which would ensure the pipe would not be damaged and that the proposed Autumn Flame Maple is a suitable street tree or that a revised landscape plan be submitted proposing landscaping that will not damage the stormwater pipe.This shall be submitted to the Development Services Division project manager for review and approval prior to the issuance of a building permit. Within the parking area,a total of 411 parking spaces are proposed,which would require a minimum of 14,385 square feet of landscaping within the parking lot (35 sq.ft.x 411 spaces = 14,385 sq.ft.)with 69 trees and 751 shrubs.The applicant's landscape analysis indicates that a total of 15,013 square feet of landscaping is proposed within the parking lot with a total of 77 trees,which complies with the minimum landscaping and tree requirements.Staff's review of the landscape plan indicated that approximately 641 shrubs are proposed within the parking area, which is less than the minimum 751 required.Therefore,staff recommends as a condition of approval that a revised landscape plan be submitted with the building permit application showing the minimum 751 shrubs required within the parking area. All landscaped areas must be fully irrigated.At the time of building permit submittal a detailed landscape plan with species identified must be submitted along with an irrigation plan. Building Height-The UC-N1 zone allows a maximum building height of 10 stories along primary and secondary arterials.The proposed building would have a height of 1 story with a maximum height of 46 feet,which is well below the maximum permitted and is in compliance with this development standard.The various sections of the building are at varied heights which helps reduce the bulk and scale of the structure. Parking,Loading,and Driveway Regulations -The parking regulations require a specific number of off-street parking stalls be provided based on the amount of square footage dedicated to certain uses.The proposed retail/big box store would be permitted a maximum of 0.4 spaces per 100 square feet of net floor area.The proposed building would include approximately 133,002 square feet of net floor area and would therefore be permitted a maximum of 532 parking spaces (133,002 net sq.ft./100 sq.ft.x 0.4 spaces =532 spaces).The proposed site plan indicates that at total of 411 parking spaces would be provided,which is less than the maximum permitted and is therefore complies with the parking requirements. Of the 411 parking spaces proposed,a minimum of 9 of those are required to comply with the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA)requirements.The proposed site plan indicates that 10 of the 411 parking spaces provided would be ADA compliant,which complies with this requirement. The minimum parking stall dimensions required in the UC-N1 zone for standard stalls is 9 feet in width by 19 feet in length and for compact stalls is 8 Y=feet in width by 16 feet in length.Compact stalls shall not account for more than 30 percent of the total number of parking spaces.The proposed standard spaces comply with the minimum width required of 9 feet;however the depth of the spaces ranges from 18 feet to 20 feet.The proposed compact stalls appear to comply with the dimensional requirements.A total of 27 compact stalls or 7 percent would be provided (27 compact stalls /411 total stalls =7 percent),which is less than the maximum of 30 percent permitted.Staff recommends as a condition of approval that either a revised site plan be submitted showing the correct parking stall dimensions for the standard spaces or a parking modification shall be requested addressing the criteria outlined under RMC 4-9-250D.The HEX staff rpt 05-161 .doc City of Renton P/B/PW Departmen .Preliminary Report to the Hearing ExaminerLOWE'S OFRENTON LUA-05-161,SA-H,SA-M,ECF PUBLIC HEARING (c) (D) DATE:July 18,2006 Page 10 of 13 applicant shall submit either the revised site plan or the modification request to the Development Services Division project manager for review and approval with the building permit application. Two driveways are proposed along the Garden Avenue N street frontage and one driveway is proposed to access off of Houser Way N.According to code,the maximum number of driveways for commercial uses is two per 330 feet of street frontage for property under unified ownership. The northern most driveway off of Houser Way N is proposed to be 30 feet in width and would provide access to the docking and loading area.The northern driveway off of Garden Avenue N is proposed to be 36 feet wide and the southern driveway off of Garden Avenue N is proposed to be 35 feet wide,both driveways off of Garden Avenue N would provide access to the Lowe's parking lot.The maximum driveway width permitted for a commercial driveway is 30 feet.Where practical difficulties exist in the compliance with this standard,the applicant may ask the Development Services Division for a modification of these requirements per the criteria outlined under RMC 4-9-250D.Therefore,staff recommends as a condition of approval that either a revised site plan be submitted showing all of the proposed driveways at a maximum width of 30 feet,or a modification to the maximum driveway standards shall be requested.The revised site plan or modification request shall be submitted to the Development Services Division Project Manager for review and approval with the building permit application. MITIGATION OF IMPACTS TO SURROUNDING PROPERTIES AND USE Commercial and Industrially zoned properties surround the subject property.It is not anticipated that the proposed Lowe's retail store would adversely impact the surrounding properties.Staff anticipates the project to add value to the site and further enhance the retail opportunities in the area.The additional retail uses would potentially increase the amount of activity in the area. Construction activities would result in short-term noise,dust and traffic impacts on surrounding properties limited to the project's construction.The applicant has submitted a Construction Mitigation Plan with the land use application outlining measures to be employed for minimizing dust,noise and traffic impacts during construction.The Construction Mitigation Plan would also be submitted prior to the issuance of any building or construction permit to verify the truck/haul routes and note any other provisions related to construction activities. MITIGATION OF IMPACTS OF THE PROPOSED SITE PLAN TO THE SITE The scale,height and bulk of the proposed building is appropriate for the site and is anticipated to be architecturally compatible with future development in the vicinity.The site is 9.78 acres and the proposed building would have a building lot coverage of less than 36.5%of the site.In addition,landscaping is proposed within the parking area and around the perimeter of the site along public street frontages. The scale of the building will be broken up through the use of vertical and horizontal modulation. The building height ranges from a minimum of 26 feet to a maximum of 46 feet in height. According to the building elevations,the building materials would consist primarily of split face concrete masonry units with some smooth face concrete masonry unit accents.Customer entry to the store would be via two entrances located along the southern facade of the building.In addition,an entrance to the indoor lumber yard is also located on the southern building facade.A 26,222 square foot garden center is proposed to the southeast of the proposed building. The heavy trucks would be enter the site via a driveway access off of Houser Way N,which would lead them to the docking and loading area located on the north side of the proposed building.The refuse area would also be located on the north side of the building,which would be contained behind a concrete masonry unit wall.The applicant requested a modification from the refuse area requirements.The City's refuse and recyclable standards would require a minimum of 10 square feet per 1,000 square feet of building gross floor area for a refuse area and a minimum of 5 square feet per 1,000 square feet of recyclable area.Based on a total gross floor area of 129,342 square feet for the proposed building a minimum of 1,293 square feet would be required for a refuse area and a minimum of 647 square feet would be required for a recyclable area.The applicant has submitted a modification request to reduce the required refuse area down to a minimum of 684 square feet.The modification requested was granted July 11,2006. HEX staff rpt 05-161 .doc City ofRenton P/B/PW Departmen,Preliminary Report to the Hearing ExaminerLOWE'S OF RENTON LUA-05-161,SA-H,SA-M,ECF PUBLIC HEARING (E) (F) (G) DATE:July 18,2006 Page 11 of 13 Potential erosion impacts that could occur during project construction would be adequately mitigated by City Code requirements for approval of a Temporary Erosion and Sedimentation Control Plan (TESCP)pursuant to the King County Surface Water Design Manual (KCSWDM) and a Construction Mitigation Plan prior to issuance of Construction Permits.In addition,the City's Environmental Review Committee imposed a mitigation measure on the project requiring compliance with the 2001 Department of Ecology Stormwater Management Manual for erosion and sediment control. CONSERVATION OF AREA-WIDE PROPERTY VALUES The proposal is expected to increase property values in the vicinity of the site.The development of the site provides improvements to infrastructure,landscaping and lighting and additional employment opportunities. SAFETY AND EFFICIENCY OF VEHICLE AND PEDESTRIAN CIRCULATION The applicant provided a Traffic Impact Analysis prepared by Kittelson &Associates,Inc.,dated February 27,2006.The proposed development is anticipated to generate additional traffic on the City's street system.Approximately 3,815 new average daily trips are estimated to be generated by the proposed development,including 320 p.m.peak hour trips.To mitigate for the increased traffic anticipated on the City's street system,the City's Environmental Review Committee imposed a mitigation measure on the project requiring the payment of a Traffic Mitigation Fee in the amount of $85,834.50 prior to the issuance of a building permit. Primary access to the site is proposed via two driveway entrances off of Garden Avenue NE,the southern driveway access would be a shared driveway access with Fry's located to the south of the subject site.Both of the proposed driveways are full access driveways.A secondary access for vehicle access to the truck docking and loading area is proposed off of House Way N.It appears that vehicles would be permitted to circulate safely throughout the subject property. An elevated concrete pedestrian walkway is proposed internally through the center of the parking lot and would extend from the main Lowe's entrance to the south to the Fry's parking lot.An additional pedestrian connection is proposed to connect the sidewalk along Garden Avenue N to the Lowe's entrance. It appears that there would be adequate separation between pedestrians and vehicles as well as a distinct traffic route for autos versus trucks thus providing safety and efficiency. Construction truck hauling hours are limited to between 8:30 a.m.to 3:30 p.m.under the Development Guidelines Ordinance in order to avoid conflicts with peak hour traffic.The Traffic Planning Section will review construction-related impacts prior to issuing final construction permits. PROVISION OF ADEQUATE LIGHT AND AIR The proposed building is designed appropriately to allow adequate light and air circulation to the building and the site.The design of the building will not result in excessive shading of the property.In addition,there is ample area surrounding the building to provide for normal airflow. Exterior onsite lighting,including security and parking lot lighting,would be regulated by code. Compliance with this code (RMC 4-4-075)ensures that all building lights are directed onto the building or the ground and can not trespass beyond the property lines.According to code,parking lot lighting fixtures are to be non-glare and mounted no more than 25 feet above the ground.This is to help minimize the impact onto adjacent properties.Staff does not anticipate that exterior lighting would become an issue due to the siting of the building provided code requirements are met.A lighting plan was not submitted with the site plan application,therefore staff recommends as a condition of approval that a lighting plan be submitted with the building permit application for review and approval by the Development Services Division project manager. HEX staff rpt 05-161 .doc City ofRenton P/B/PW DepartmenL Preliminary Report to the Hearing Examiner LOWE'S OFRENTON LUA-05-161,SA-H,SA-M,ECF PUBLIC HEARING (H) DATE:July 18,2006 Page 12 of 13 MITIGATION OF NOISE,ODORS AND OTHER HARMFUL OR UNHEALTHY CONDITIONS It is anticipated that the most significant noise,odor and other potentially harmful impacts would occur during the construction phase of the project.The applicant has submitted a Construction Mitigation Plan that provides measures to reduce construction impacts such as noise,control of dust,traffic controls,etc. The proposed development is not anticipated to generate any harmful or unhealthy conditions. There would be noise impacts of increased traffic and activity that are normally associated with an office development that has truck traffic. (i)AVAILABILITY OF PUBLIC SERVICES AND FACILITIES TO ACCOMMODATE THE PROPOSED USE Fire Department and Police staff have indicated existing facilities are adequate to accommodate the subject proposal,subject to the applicant's payment of the necessary impact fees.As imposed by the ERC,the applicant will be required to pay the Fire Mitigation fee prior to the issuance of building permits. A Preliminary Storm Drainage Analysis prepared by PacLand dated December 14,2005 was submitted with the project application.According to the report,the existing surface water runoff sheet flows across the property from the east into onsite catch basins on the western side of the property,where it is then conveyed offsite through a 24 inch pipe that outfalls into the 72 inch public storm system in Garden Avenue N.The proposed method of drainage control is to collect the onsite stormwater runoff from the paved surfaces into catch basins and underground storm drainage pipes.The water will then be routed to two separate water quality compost stormwater filters for water quality treatment prior to discharging into the existing 72 inch stormwater conveyance pipe located in Garden Avenue N.The stormwater runoff from the building rooftop is collected and transported at the rear of the building and will bypass the water quality system and be discharged into the existing 72 inch stormwater conveyance pipe located in Garden Avenue N. Staff from the City's Plan Review Section have reviewed the report and note that the report addresses the requirements of the 1990 King County Surface Water Design Manual.The Environmental Review Committee imposed a mitigation measure requiring the project to comply with the 2001 Department of Ecology Stormwater Management Manual for water quality improvements. Utilities are required to be installed and extended as necessary to the building by the applicant as required by City code. (J)PREVENTION OF NEIGHBORHOOD DETERIORATION AND BLIGHT The proposal would result in the development with coordinated site improvements including landscaping,parking,signage and lighting.It is anticipated that the proposed Lowe's retail building would contribute to the surrounding properties by developing a vacant site and providing investment in the area.No deterioration or blight is expected to occur as a result of this proposal. H.RECOMMENDA T/ON: Staff recommends approval of the Lowe's of Renton,Project File No.LUA-05*161,SA-H,SA-M,ECF subject to the following conditions: 1.Information shall be provided regarding the proposed landscaping within the 20-foot stormwater easement to the east of Garden Avenue N that would ensure the existing stormwater pipe would not be damaged and that the proposed Autumn Flame Maple is a suitable street tree.Or,a revised landscape plan shall be submitted proposing appropriate landscaping that will not damage the stormwater pipe.This shall be submitted to the Development Services Division project manager for review and approval prior to the issuance of a building permit. 2.A revised landscape plan shall be submitted with the building permit application showing the minimum 751 shrubs required within the parking area.The revised landscape plan shall be submitted to the Development Services Division project manager for review and approval. HEX staff rpt 05-161 .doc City of Renton P/B/PW Departmen Preliminary Report to the Hearing ExaminerLOWE'S OF RENTON LUA-05-161,SA-H,SA-M,ECF PUBLIC HEARING 3. . , DATE."July 18,2006 Page 13 of 13 A revised site plan shall be submitted showing all of the proposed driveways at a maximum width of 30 feet,or a modification to the maximum driveway standards shall be requested.The revised site plan or modification request shall be submitted to the Development Services Division Project Manager for review and approval with the building permit application. Either a revised site plan shall be submitted showing the correct parking stall dimensions for the standard spaces in the UC-N1 zone or a parking modification shall be requested addressing the criteria outlined under RMC 4-9-250D.The applicant shall submit either the revised site plan or the modification request to the Development Services Division project manager for review and approval with the building permit application. A lighting plan shall be submitted with the building permit application for review and approval by the Development Services Division project manager. EXPIRATION PERIODS: Site Plan Approvals (SA):Two (2)years from the final approval date. HEX staff rpt 05-161 .doc I B .S .P ,.II N G ST, E 15 7 P mz0 / / I1tlt1!|"PRELIMINARY ORADIN(I i iiGiI1|!III#,o STORM DRAINAGE PLAN II J 1llTl=lld ,_!r 0 '-b Z / f /......L.\ +""iiiIOWE'$"I++++t+"+""-'":'"'""+m..+.+.=+-_;+__m_jj "+:'+++'°,I me.==,+,/tl ='='W+"II I ,,, e, } ,!,'rtil'l !lt;;i I !ljllil : it'i I I I I I I I i i I I Ill,'l,-.[IIIIIIIit1111 •,!....................!i ........ ....... llt'-l"I ®® Illtlliilllltllllitlll":l!!ill Ill"1ll'llii,,I.!i Iilil111''!i'll1 lI]llil"I l lllii Ill".!1o';t!l1,.,.,,,!tl .I'11 i'!!t I'!!!- lllIIk!f]il..-,o----,--II11!'-"I--II I IRENTON,WASHiNGTON tllllllml/ei.m I Iliillllllllllllllil illllll!lllllllllllltltllililliliiiUilllllllllllillilllli I iliZli[I ]IIII1IIIi.ltli il,I 11 I .li !!1111liimliiiili;dlllllt!lltllil!ll!!llllllt'".llll li i i "I '1 I',i 'i ,,,..--.,-,-,-,-.-;,-i.--.-.---.iillIiIliIiiti,II I,II I iliil I I II Ii I II "ii I I I !Jll!llhlli,!,.I !!!.l,l'l,,.1 !.,,.I.,,,,,!!il,,J,,,',!ll,.qil!!ll,,!!h!l !llllllilllIiJillIllIIII'0 I,li I lll,I IIIhlli I !!1,Ill !!',,!!l J,!!i i IIli,li!t!t,I]!l h l!,,!!lill!!ll ''"'.......'l illliI"i ,,'i II Ol III !l I I •I tl I II .I I I ttt I ,iIllIIII*I r i !iJl,,!!-!,,!,I!:i:'..,!l I.Il,!l,,,,il,ii I !,,,..,.i I,,,,,,,,,,I,•I I |i '||lillhlil II II lllliiili I I t I I I1,,,r --",1 "I ",t t ,•!It .1!I I,II!1111111 II.,I,I,!!i ill .,lili I ,il II!11i,I ,,illlllll,llllllillll•,="l II III I"1111 ''!I"'.":"I":'"'iII111i III"I!1111!I ii J i i I i irJll,•'"i !']1".!!.11l!!'!ii Z 0 D4 o 5 T23N R5E W 1/Z / Z i......J ....... UC-NI F4 -17 TZ3N RSE W 1/2, P/D/PW CAL 8BIVICB8o 8 T23N RSE W 11253O8 NOTE ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION &PUBLIC HEARING ISSUANCE OF A DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE -MITIGATED (DNS-M) POSTEDTO NOTIFY INTERESTED PERSONS OF AN ENVIRONMENTAL ACTION PROJECTNAME:i i Lowe'sofRenton PROJECTNUMBER:LUA05.161,SA-H,SA-M,ECFLOCATION:800 Garden Avenue N DESCRIPTION:The applicant Is requesting Environmental (SEPA}review,and Master Plan and Site'Development Plan approvals for a Lowe's Home Improvement retail store totaling 129,342 eq ft,with a gardenareatotaling26,222 sq ft and 411 parking spaces.The 9.78-acre site iszoned Urban CenterNorth-1 (UNC-1),andislocatedat800GardenAve.N at the Intersection ofParkAve.N and Garden Ave.NE. THE CITY OF RENTON ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COMMITTEE (ERC)HAS DETERMINED THAT THE PROPOSED ACTION DOES NOT HAVE A SIGNIFICANT ADVERSE 'IMPACT ON THEENVIRONMENT. Appeals ofthe environmental determination must be filed In writing on or before $:OO PM on July 14,2006.Appeals must be filed in writing together with the required $70,00 application fee with:Hearing Examiner,City of Renton, 1055 South Grady Way,Renton,WA 98095,Appeals to the Examinerare governed by City ofRenton Municipal Code Section 4-8-t10,B,Additional Information regarding the appeal process may be obtained from the Renton CityClerk's Office,(425)430-6510, A PUBLIC HEARING.WILL BE HELD BY THE RENTON HEARING EXAMINER AT HIS REGULARMEETINGINTHECOUNCILCHAMBERSONTHE7THFLOOROFCITYHALL,1055 SOUTH GRADY WAY,RENTON,WASHINGTON,ON JULY 18,2006 AT 9:00 AM TO CONSIDER THE SITE PLAN.IFTHEENVIRONMENTALDETERMINATIONISAPPEALED,THE APPEALWILL BE HEARD AS PARTOFTHISPUBLICHEARING. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION,PLEASE CONTACT THE CITY OF RENTON,DEVELOPMENTSERVICESDIVIS3ONAT(425)430-7200.DO NOT REMOVE THIS NOTICE WITHOUT PROPER AUTHORIZATI)N CERTIFICATION ,...ereby ce.ify copies of the above doc.me.twerepostedbymeinconspicuousplacesornearbythedescribedpropertyon,,,,,,_',xX,.x.LlliF F k,,LYNV 'II•,;,,,,.,,,,,..,,,,,,•''-//-ATTEST:Subscribed and sworn before me,a Notary Public,in and fot-t'he State of Washington residing"i !'-.."i'I Q\,.on the day of /Lx....q'l v'/6'LG 'll,.As.t....-"='I IIltlilllli%%'V" CITY OF RENTON CURRENT PLANNING DIVISION AFFIDAVIT OF SERVICE BY MAILING On the 28th day of June,2006,I deposited in the mails of the United States,a sealed envelope containing ERC Determination documents.This information was sent to: ...Name,".".. Agencies Mike Neer,PACLAND Jim Manion,Lowe's HIW Dash -89,LP ....Representing See Attached Contact Applicant Owner (Signature of Sender):/__ STATE OF WASHINGTON )L.) )ssCOUNTYOFKING) I certify that I know or have satisfactory evidence that Stacy Tucker signed this instrument and acknowledged it to be his/her/their free and voluntary act for the uses and purposes mentioned in the instrument• Dated:l.-.%o-OL,, Notary (Print): My appointment expires: No'tary Public in and for thete of Washington •f Project Name:Lowe's of Renton Project Number:LUA05-161,SA-H,SA-M,ECF template -affidavit of service by mailing AGENCY (DOE)LETTER MAILING (ERC DETERMINATIONS) Dept.of Ecology * Environmental Review Section PO Box 47703 Olympia,WA 98504-7703 WSDOT Northwest Region * Attn:Ramin Pazooki King Area Dev.Serv.,MS-240POBox330310 Seattle,WA 98133-9710 US Army Corp.of Engineers * Seattle District Office Attn:SEPA Reviewer PO Box C-3755 Seattle,WA 98124 Jamey Taylor * Depart.of Natural ResourcesPOBox47015 Olympia,WA 98504-7015 KC Dev.&Environmental Serv.Attn:SEPA Section 900 Oakesdale Ave.SW Renton,WA 98055-1219 Metro Transit Senior Environmental Planner Gary Kriedt 201 South Jackson Street Seattle,WA 98104-3856 Seattle Public Utilities Real Estate Services Title Examiner 700 Fifth Avenue,Suite 4900POBox34018 Seattle,WA 98124-4018 KSC-TR-0431 WDFW -Stewart Reinbold * c/o Department of Ecology3190160thAveSE Bellevue,WA 98008 Duwamish Tribal Office * 4717 W Marginal Way SW Seattle,WA 98106-1514 KC Wastewater Treatment Division * Environmental Planning Supervisor Ms.Shirley Marroquin 201 S.Jackson ST,MS KSC-NR-050 Seattle,WA 98104-3855 City of Newcastle Attn:Mr.Micheal E.Nicholson Director of Community Development13020SE72ndPlace Newcastle,WA 98059 Puget Sound Energy Municipal Liason Manager Joe Jainga PO Box 90868,MS:XRD-01W Bellevue,WA 98009-0868 Muckleshoot Indian Tribe Fisheries Dept.* Attn:Karen Walter or SEPA Reviewer 39015 -172nd Avenue SE Auburn,WA 98092 Muckleshoot Cultural Resources Program * Attn:Ms Melissa Calvert39015172ndAvenueSE Auburn,WA 98092-9763 Office of Archaeology &Historic Preservation* Attn:Stephanie KramerPOBox48343 Olympia,WA 98504-8343 City of Kent Attn:Mr.Fred Satterstrom,AICP Acting Community Dev.Director 220 Fourth Avenue South Kent,WA 98032-5895 City of Tukwila Steve Lancaster,Responsible Official 6300 Southcenter Blvd. Tukwila,WA 98188 Note:If the Notice of Application states that it is an "Optional DNS",the marked agencies and cities will need to be sent a copy of the checklist,PMT's,and the notice of application.* Also note,do not mail Jamey Taylor any of the notices she gets hers from the web.Only send her the ERC Determination paperwork. template -affidavit of service by mailing !. ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION &PUBLIC HEARING ISSUANCE OF A DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE -MITIGATED (DNS-M) POSTED TO NOTIFY INTERESTED PERSONS OF AN ENVIRONMENTAL ACTION ] PROJECT.....NAME:i Lowe's of Renton PROJECT NUMBER:LUA05-161,SA-H,SA-M,ECF .. LOCATION:800 Garden Avenue N DESCRIPTION:The applicant Is requesting Environmental (SEPA)review,and Master Plan and Site Development Plan approvals for a Lowe's Home Improvement retail store totaling 129,342 sq ft,with a garden area totaling 26,222 sq ft and 411 parking spaces.The 9.78-acre site is zoned Urban Center North-1 (UNC-1),and is located at 800 Garden Ave.N at the intersection of Park Ave.N and Garden Ave.NE. THE CITY OF RENTON ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COMMITTEE (ERC)HAS DETERMINED THATTHEPROPOSEDACTIONDOESNOTHAVEASIGNIFICANTADVERSEIMPACTONTHE ENVIRONMENT. Appeals of the environmental determination must be filed in writing on or before 5:00 PM on July 14,2006.Appeals must be filed in writing together with the required $75.00 application fee with:Hearing Examiner,City of Renton, 1055 South Grady Way,Renton,WA 98055.Appeals to the Examiner are governed by City of Renton Municipal Code Section 4-8-110.B.Additional information regarding the appeal process may be obtained from the Renton City Clerk's Office,(425)430-6510. A PUBLIC HEARINGIWILL BE HELD BY THE RENTON HEARING EXAMINER AT HIS REGULARMEETINGINTHECOUNCILCHAMBERSONTHE7THFLOOROFCITYHALL,1055 SOUTH GRADY WAY,RENTON,WASHINGTON ON JULY 18,2006 AT 9:00 AM TO CONSIDER THE SITE PLAN.IFTHEENVIRONMENTALDETERMINATIONISAPPEALED,THE APPEAL WILL BE HEARD AS PART OF THIS PUBLIC HEARING. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION,PLEASE CONTACT THE CITY OF RENTON,DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DIVISION AT (425)430-7200.DO NOT REMOVE THIS NOTICE WITHOUT PROPER AUTHORIZATION ...''/:....,.....-'",'•,.:i .:.,•""'""," {>:J".]>":ly'K;olkt,Mayot :.."."-".....:GreggZimm6rmn:P,E,administratof..........-•/<7/.,,'..:.-i.'..-":i.i...:.-.,'..:":".:.,"i.!:.'.::":"':...i::-::i-.,;!.::-.:...::.....-=" •:June27,::2006"..[:""".['.:'i .;..:.i:....:i."i",.-]/.:',:.i..]:","'.... =•"......i '"','",iI " ""i1235 SE 6th Street #220 "i-:............."....".:.='.::i "- .'":..,.%,...:,, .;....":,"-Bellevue WA"98004 ....,..::.'.(.,,.....,..:../-...-...:--.:.,..,. •",•....•:.....i..['.......:i..,:'-.::,t ";'",,:="...."/"""'""" .."......".:•/.".:[_.._•""".:.:"''i '.'"""SUBJECT::."Lowe'sofRenton :'""i .'....:-.::".""...'•.,..""","..-':]". Dear Mr.-Ner.i::....:.:-.........,.::...-,,,"i .:i .ii.i i i ...,":- .:This:lettei'i.Writtenonbehaif:of.fl6:EnvJr6nrflentalReview committee (ERc}.io."a.dvise.[.you:that-they """ ":"hive .compieted their r_eview 0f the sub]ectpr0ject and_-haye ::issued :a threshold:Determinat.ioh!.Of,Ndn'.... ".SignitiCance:.Mitigated With Mitiglation Measures:Piease rifer,to the:enclosed..ERO.,ReoiZtandD&cision, ".SectionC fOr.a:.listof,the-Mitigati0n Meas'ures.'/::.="".:•":....•-.,,:'.].::,,".<.;!...,,.'...:.-. .-.".":-•.-',:..........,.,._/....L.'.-:-.....:.,.":'",'."':":".,.,.7:.:.".:..,'-:::.%:""".:.*"'...,'.../..[.=Appeals of.the.environmental.-determ'inationmust.be filed.:in.writing .on:or:before:5:00P....Mi0n July......::.-•',:4,,2006:.::Appeals must:be 6d:[`witingtgethbrwiththe:required:$75;..`appii;atinfee:with`:Heiihg:..:"..: :..::,[Exai-n[ner:,:city0f Renton,!1055:Southi::'Grady ay,.Ren.ton:i:.WA:98055::-"Apeai"s:toi:the.Exa neriare ::," ......g0..verned.:]y-City 0f Rerlt0n :Municipal::.Gode:Sieti0fi(!'48;l::li0.B["Additi0nal.infQafion.:egfirditg:the:;-.":" ''."".app.eair0Cess ma,be 0btaih&d/froih)he Renton€it,"dierkrS.iOffice,(425y30:.:65:Ji(.:::":,..11 :;:,.."i-i ..-::"::-i.-' •.A.PUbiic:Hearing wiil:be held'!:by-the,Rent0n::iHeaijng Eximi'ner in 'ttie:.,'COuhC[i.Chambers"on ihe.:'". .-Sev6fi-th'f!o:or.of city.:Hall,::!0_55Soutl:Gl'dy(Way,::lnton,Washingtdn;0i,-.Jluiy::tl.:8;2006:.atg:00....- ,AM to.consider the Site Plan...:T.:he applidantlbr ireirsentatie(s-)of the appi'i,ant!i/requJte-dtO:be.pre6ht.:" ;..at the public-hearing..A.copy of;ithe:istaff reportiwiii::be mailed'to you One veekibeforethe hea'ring..If the, EnviiOnmental 'Determinationis appealed,the appea/wili beheardas part"of.thispubliC'hearing.:....i i :i<., •,tThe prec"edinginformati0n will:assisty6u.in'planning:.for:impiernentation of y,our::lJOjCt:and6nable :you:to :":" .iexercise ]yourappeal rights rnb'r:e fully,if you choose,to::;do So:If you.have :.any:.::-luestions:[:or.desire:.,"..: "":cla'ification ofthe above,pleas&call me at(425ii:3,30-72;119::::......r.:,=:;"i':'.:'::'"::i':.""'.:::'::''i :':":"..:"'::.'.=''"", ."'For:iheEnvironmentai Review Comm'iRee,.:.".:.:::,?::i::.]-.:-:....-:.-../i.:!:.!"i.::.':-'..-...i,.'.,•'...:i: i i....--":c:::;:'.i :Dasiiza0;;LP z Owner(s)',:.i ...:".::-:-.:[:"i;i!;"::'-:::::.:..i;."::::,..i-.,:,i;,i::::.i!"i.":":="'-,".".-'.: ":":,"";E,nclosure;,"::..i -'i ':./":."-.:!.:::":::::''...";,::""":]"i,''.;'...:j/:;::"-::.::::,."'.::."""'•...'..:'. i ,i '.105.5 South GraityWay,Renton,:shington .98055 ..-"b•i .'.";..-!-..2 '1 ...:........:...."-.'.j ...,i.,.:i::i:.,:.".i ".....-":i )':':::;['::l:j::i)i::)'"".:":-'::..:.:(j::j:::..'-Planning/Bui!dubiicWo rks.Depattmeat:::::::.:-:":- :":")K:Keolker,Ma or "".....":"2 """Gregg..Zimmerliiail p;E.,Administrator •'-..... ..,-"June27i2006,": '"':::"'""i :•:,",.,.-),:." .:.).:_,,"Washingt0n;State ':'i'- •.-.:...:Depament0fEcologyi).:.........-'.-.::•i."Environmental:ReviewSection .':-....., :.i:.:::i..J Olympia.....'WA.:"".98504"7703.................." :-:""'""(""-''L''':,.,.:-.. •.,.,.,, •..•..,.•...'... :it..-..."::".Subjecti.,.':.;Environmental....:.Determinaiions...."._-...::..i'".i ":.':ii:i :-.'',"•!ii"":-i ,j ';.i (:.i :i- •.."-".Transmitted.helewith is.a:copy:of the.Environmentai Determination .for thefoflowing)irojecti'eviewed by.":.r :":.''." "".";theEnir0hmental ReyiewCommittee..(.ERC)onJune 27;2006:.,)....;.?-].';.;......:... :.•'""DETERMINATIONOFNON-SIGNIFICANCE,MITIGATED:.'"J--.:1..'"."-:-'-.-i.•"<.i,.,....:-.:;'...:?'..,. -"•,.,:...-PROJECT NAME:...LowesofRento --:.•.,.::.,........•.:.........:!i ;i:..:).PROJECTNUMBER:...":LUA05-i61.-SA.H,SA=M;ECF '::'):"'.:":J..'...."::")=.; 'i:;."•'..LOCATION:.."i.,800':Garden:AvenueN:".......,:..).i-:"....-.,:-,.:"':(i/;.::: ,....:j..:....:.:DESCRIPTION:....:'rhe..appiieani:riquesting Environmentai:i (NEPA)..Feviewi-and-[.i""i"i::-" i;!:.-.ii...•;:":::"'"i:Ma:st6r;Piah.and)iSite'Development P'lanappfivais:fora Lowe's::j.,-!:,::i. I:':']"",,:0""'","''O #r '"2 J"..'"::HOme.Jlmproveme/nt,',retai/:store :totaling:'129i.:312!.:sq ft,With :.a....:=".?i):: •.:":,i;-:".:-:.):ggr_:den:aria totaling'.26,222]sqftad-41,l::lhr.kJngspaces::The :'i-"."i::.j:'..:. ).::(.::"",:•....."'":;:.9;tSacfe".site,.:is).zoned-iurbah cente"r:Northi).(UNC-1),and-lis '..i.:-ii:!;-."-. •"i ::(::-.""',.;-"'.i!:..'loeated.i:ht -800.1Giird'eh,:'Ave.N.at the =JfitersetiOii"/Of -Park Ave:N .:/:I/;=-.:/...:?"'..?(.....::",.,..:..:•".....i.i .),::andGardbn:ve:.NE =......-:"'""':'i:::-:::.".•••....::.:..;..>;:.:,.:- i.("ii.::-.:Appeals:of :the-environmentaldetb?niination muM"b?iiiled in:.wrlting,dn:or.before 5-00 PM on =July .,'.:i;:.::'.:)?;)'.::. :.:".,:.14,.2006..Appeals musfbefiled)inwritlngt0gethr;with?ihe.required $75.00applieii{i6n fee,with:Hearing.-..).:;;/?,": :/..Examiner City Of Rent0n,:1'055's6uth:.iraciyWay Ren{on,WA98055..:.ii:Appea]glif6;th6 Examiner ai:e .:,.."... ',::i".::,..governed by.City of Rent0nMiJnicip'al,:C6de Section:"4-8-,!lo,B.Additi6nal:=ifif6rm':ation :?egarding the "?:"):? ,/.,''..appeal;:pr0cess may.beobtainedfromtheRenton.city.Cierk:s.Office,(425)430:65!i0.::.:,'"•'."..::, -,.....Ifyou have questions,please:chllmeat(425)430:72i9./(.,".:':-".=i ..2-..':..:-:::/-,,:•i"i.:"::.i-:)-:?i).:!..:.::.:,.:i.Forthe Environmental RevieW.€ominitteel '::"::(:),....;..-./:'::..i."..:"...i;:!,i)..!]):. :i :i :.:,_'':.'::"::;>:-'::" !."-"",:":-:.;c "K ng County Was(ewatei'iTi:eatmentDivision '-.,...-.::..:.,"'::;.;--,':.":).:-ii.."i .;. .,:.:/5 "...")WDFW StewartIeinboId:!-::'..."".-":-.-..-.-...:.':i .::!,::,:'.':"""."::"',.";:..." ?.":"?'."i,'/:')"i David F.:DietZmah,Dpaament!of Natural]ReSources i 'i,.:."".:;:".:':.)".,..-....:::,:i/:':,,:.',. ;::i.]:,:--.)>j',-:j:--WSDOT;Northwes[Regibr;)"..,"i ..:''.-::',"..,"-:::/.,.i..".?,,,::.,..:, :'.i.,!::::...!.i%.''Karen'waltei,'Fi,sheries :MtickI6hoot IndianTribe (Ordinarice)....".7::......i'',.''['':_,.-:,"-i ;i/i.,;<;:-=. -)(,-(:..).;:?;,./..MelissaCalve:MdIleshotCuitural Resources Pr0(iram,-/..:.,,--:..":i":'.-;i-'..',"..":;...",-i.:':),."': !.<:;''I..L,.::.'stephanieKramer;.Office of Ai'chaeology &Histor.ic PreServation .:.'-):::!.-;i..::-.....:..:..::,,:..<.:,-: "......,s,i ':.):':(:ii (:"05 u t o CITY OF RENTON DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE (MITIGATED) APPLICATION NO(S):LUA05-161,SA-H,SA-M,ECF APPLICANT:Jim Manion,Lowe's HIW PROJECT NAME:Lowe's of Renton DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSAL:The applicant is requesting Environmental (SEPA)review,and Master Plan and Site Development Plan approvals for a Lowe's Home Improvement retail store totaling 129,342 sq ft, with a garden area totaling 26,222 sq ft and 411 parking spaces.The 9.78-acre site is zoned Urban Center North-1 (UNC-1),and is located at 800 Garden Ave.N at the intersection of Park Ave.N and Garden Ave.NE. LOCATION OF PROPOSAL:800 Garden Avenue N LEAD AGENCY:The City of Renton Department of Planning/Building/Public Works Development Planning Section The City of Renton Environmental Review Committee has determined that it does not have a probable significant adverse impact on the environment.An Environmental Impact Statement (EIS)is not required under RCW 43.21C.030(2)(c). Conditions were imposed as mitigation measures by the Environmental Review Committee under their authority of Section 4-6-6 Renton Municipal Code.These conditions are necessary to mitigate environmental impacts identified during the environmental review process. Appeals of the environmental determination must be filed in writing on or before 5:00 PM on July 14,2006. Appeals must be filed in writing together with the required $75.00 application fee with:Hearing Examiner,City of Renton, 1055 South Grady Way,Renton,WA 98055.Appeals to the Examiner are governed by City of Renton Municipal Code Section 4-8-110.B.Additional information regarding the appeal process may be obtained from the Renton City Clerk's Office,(425)430-6510. PUBLICATION DATE:June 30,2006 DATE OF DECISION:June 27,2006 SIGNATURES: G r'g Zi'mTnTf m,'Ad'rn'[n istra{0r Planning/Building/Public Works Ter Higashiyama,Administrator J Community Services ,Interim Fire ChiefFireDepartment Date 'lekx Pietsch,AdminiStrator Date EDNSP Gregg Zimmerman,Planning/Building/Public Works Administrator Terry Higashiyama,Community Services Administrator Larry Rude,Interim Fire Chief Alex Pietsch,EDNSP Administrator From:Jennifer Henning,Development Planning Agenda listed below. Defoor Short Plat (Din.q) LUA05-089,SHPL-H The applicant is proposing to subdivide a 140,723 square foot (3.2 acre)site zoned Residential -8 dwelling units per acre (R-8)into 5 lots and an open space tract (Parcel B).The lots are proposed to range in size from 5,500 square feet to 11,574 square feet.The lots are intended for the eventual development of single-family residences.The subject site contains a Class 3 stream,2 Class 4 streams,a Class 3 wetland,steep slopes,and high coal mine hazard areas. Lowe's of Renton (Ding LUA05-161,SA-H,SA-M,ECF The applicant is requesting Environmental (SEPA)review,and Master Plan and Site Development Plan approvals for a Lowe's Home Improvement retail store totaling 129,342 sq ft,with a garden area totaling 26,222 sq ft and 411 parking spaces.The 9.78-acre site is zoned Urban Center North-1 (UNC-1),and is located at 800 Garden Ave.N at the intersection of Park Ave.N and Garden Ave.NE. Exit 7 Auto Sales (Ding) LUA06-044,SA-A,ECF Applicant is requesting Administrative Site Plan Review,and Environmental (SEPA)Review for the construction of an auto sales lot.The proposed auto sales lot would be constructed on a 1.87 acre vacant parcel located within the Commercial Arterial (CA)zoning designation.Access to the site would be provided via a commercial driveway onto NE 44th Street.A Class 2 stream and an associated Category 2 wetland have been identified on the west side of the subject property.A Class 2 stream requires a 100- foot buffer and a Category 2 wetland requires a 50-foot buffer.A reduction in the stream buffer down to a minimum of 75 feet has been requested. CC:K.Keolker,MayorJ.Covington,Chief Administrative OfficerB.Wolters,EDNSP Director ®J.Gray,Fire PreventionN.Watts,P/B/PW Development Services Director ® F.Kaufman,Hearing ExaminerS.Engler,Fire Prevention ®J.Medzegian,CouncilP.Hahn,P/B/PW Transportation Systems DirectorR.Lind,Economic DevelopmentL.Warren,City Attorney ® REPORT & DECISION City of Renton Department of Planning /Building /Public Works ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COMMITTEE ERC MEETING DA TE:June 27th,2006 Project Name:Lowe's of Renton Contact:Mike Neer,PACLAND,11235 SE 6th St.,Ste.220,Bellevue,WA 98004 Applicant:Jim Manion,Lowe's HIW,1530 Faraday Ave.,Ste.140,Carlsbad,CA 92008 Owner:Dash-80,L.P.,440 N.1 st Street,Ste.200,San Jose,CA 95112 Project Manager:Jill K.Ding,Senior Planner Project Description:The applicant is requesting Environmental (SEPA)review,and Master Plan and Site Development Plan approvals for a Lowe's Home Improvement retail store totaling 129,342 sq ft,with a garden area totaling 26,222 sq ft and 411 parking spaces.The 9.78-acre site is zoned Urban Center North-1 (UNC-1), and is located at 800 Garden Ave.N at the intersection of Park Ave.N and Garden Ave.NE. Project Location:800 Garden Ave.N Exist.Bldg.Area SF:N/A (parking lot)Proposed New Bldg.Area SF:155,564 Site Area:9.78 acres Total Building Area SF on site:155,564 SITE Project Location Map ERC rpt 05-161 Lowe's City ofRenton P/B/PWDepartment .onmental Review Committee StaffReport LOWE'S OF RENTON LUA-05-161,SA-H,SA-M,ECF REPORT OFJUNE 27,2006 Page 2 of7 A.PROJECT DESCRIPTION AND BACKGROUND The project site is within a portion of the area zoned Urban Center North-1 (UNC-1)that was created subsequent to The Boeing Company's abandonment of several historical parking and building areas associated with its Lake Union facilities.The project site is currently vacant,but is completely paved with lighting and drainage improvements.The proposal would include a new retail store of approximately 129,342 sq ft,an associated garden center of approximately 26,222 sq ft,411 parking stalls,and associated infrastructure such as landscaping,water,sewer,and stormwater facilities. The site currently has access from Garden Ave N and Houser Way,but the proposed development would remove the Houser Way driveway and have access from Garden Ave.N as a joint driveway with the existing Fry's Electronics retail store to the south. The project will require removal of approximately 5,000 cu yd of asphalt (parking lot pavement). Approximately 20,000 cu yd of onsite soil material will be regraded,and approximately 10,000 cu yd of gravel will be imported to construct the sub-base below the proposed building and new parking lot areas. The site is served by City of Renton water and sewer,which would be extended as necessary to serve the proposed development.Stormwater runoff from the site currently drains to existing catch basins on the western side of the site,which ultimately discharges to the public stormwater system in Garden Ave.N.The proposal includes construction of an onsite stormwater collection system for the parking areas that will be filtered prior to offsite discharge,and a rooftop runoff collection system that will bypass the water quality system. No trees,and no wetlands or other environmentally sensitive areas,are located on the site.The proposal includes perimeter and interior landscaping of street frontages and parking lots. The applicant has indicated that construction would begin in June 2006 and be completed by the winter of 2007.The estimated total construction cost is approximately $6.6 million. B.RECOMMENDAT/ON Based on analysis of probable impacts from the proposal,staff recommends that the Responsible Officials make the following Environmental Determination: DETERMINA'I ION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE Issue DNS with 14 day Appeal Period.X DETERMINA T/ON OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE-MITIGATED. Issue DNS-M with 14 day Appeal Period. Issue DNS-M with 15 day Comment Period followed by a 14 day Appeal Period. ERC rpt 05-161 City ofRenton P/B/PW Department ronmental Review CommitteeStaffReport LOWE'S OF RENTON LUA-05-161,SA-H,SA-Ill,ECF 'REPORTOFJUNE27,2006 C.MITIGATION MEASURES Page 3 of 7 . . . . The project shall be designed to comply with the Department of Ecology's (DOE)Erosion and Sediment Control Requirements,outlined in Volume II of the 2001 Stormwater Management Manual.Erosion and sediment control measures shall be installed and maintained to the satisfaction of the representative of the Development Services Division for the duration of the project's construction. The applicant shall comply with the recommendations of the geotechnical engineering report prepared by GeoEngineers,Inc.,dated January 26,2006,regarding earthwork and soil compaction,design of foundations,floor slabs and retaining walls,structural fill,drainage,paving,and utilities. The pilings to be located along Garden Avenue N shall be augercast piles or driven steel pipe piles that extend through the liquefiable/compressible upper alluvial deposits and bear on the lower alluvial deposits to protect the stormwater pipe. The project shall be designed to comply with the 2001 Department of Ecology Stormwater Management Manual for water quality. 5.The applicant shall pay a Transportation Mitigation Fee of $85,837.50 for the proposed 3,815 new average daily trips that will be generated by the proposed development.Fees are subject to change and are payable prior to the issuance of a building permit. 6.The applicant shall pay a Fire Mitigation Fee of $0.52 per square foot,for a current estimated total of $75,420.80.Fees are subject to change and are payable prior to the issuance of building permits. D.ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS In compliance with RCW 43.21 C.240,the following project environmental review addresses only those project impacts that are not adequately addressed under existing development standards and environmental regulations. 1.Earth Impacts:The applicant provided a Geotechnical Memorandum dated December 12,2005,a Geotechnical Engineering Report dated January 26,2006,and a Geotechnical Letter dated April 28, 2006 prepared by GeoEngineers,Inc.The project will require removal of approximately 5,000 cu yd of asphalt (parking lot pavement).Approximately 20,000 cu yd of onsite soil material will be regraded,and approximately 10,000 cu yd of gravel will be imported to construct the sub-base below the proposed building and new parking lot areas. The geotechnical report indicates that potentially liquefiable alluvial soils are indicated on the site. This is consistent with the City's Seismic Hazard Area map,which shows the subject property within a seismic hazard area.Design of the buildings will need to address the potential for liquefaction induced settlement,with suggested options such as supporting structures on deep foundations or providing stone columns or aggregate piers,depending on soil conditions.The presence of highly compressed historical wetland deposits may limit the use of shallow foundation supports.Utility installations will also need to account for potential differential settlements that may occur between utilities and the buildings they serve.Foundation installation may require vibration monitoring if driven piles or other ground improvements (such as piers)are installed,to prevent damage to the existing 72-inch stormwater pipe along Garden Avenue N.If piles are driven into the ground,the applicant estimates that it would take approximately 6-8 weeks to drive the piles.The geotechnical report recommends that the planned building and floor slabs should be supported on augercast piles ERC rpt 05-161 City ofRenton P/B/PW Department ,onmentalReview Committee StaffReport LOWE 'S OF RENTON LUA-O$-I61,SA-H,SA-M,ECF REPORT OF JUNE27,2006 Page 4 of7 or driven steel pipe piles that extend through the liquefiable/compressible upper alluvial deposits and bear on the lower alluvial deposits. Staff recommends a mitigation measure requiring the applicant to comply with the submitted Geotechnical Memorandum dated December 12,2005,Geotechnical Engineering Report dated January 26,2006,and Geotechnical Letter dated April 28,2006 prepared by GeoEngineers,Inc. It is anticipated that temporary onsite erosion and offsite sedimentation from stormwater flows leaving the site can be expected during the construction period,which will involve site grading and placement of fill material.This work will potentially occur during the rainy season (October-March). Staff recommends a mitigation measure requiring the project to comply with vol.II of the Department of Ecology 2001 Stormwater Management Manual for erosion and sedimentation control. Miti.qation Measures: . 1.The project shall be designed to comply with the Department of Ecology's (DOE)Erosion and Sediment Control Requirements,outlined in Volume II of the 2001 Stormwater Management Manual.Erosion and sediment control measures shall be installed and maintained to the satisfaction of the representative of the Development Services Division for the duration of the project's construction. 2.The applicant shall comply with the recommendations of the Geotechnical Memorandum dated December 12,2005,Geotechnical Engineering Report datedJanuary 26,2006,and Geotechnical Letter dated April 28,2006 prepared by GeoEngineers,Inc.,regarding earthwork and soil compaction,design of foundations,floor slabs and retaining walls,structural fill, drainage,paving,and utilities. 3.The pilings to be located along Garden Avenue N shall be augercast piles or driven steel pipe piles that extend through the liquefiable/compressible upper alluvial deposits and bear on the lower alluvial deposits to protect the stormwater pipe. Policy Nexus:SEPA Environmental Regulations;Vol.II 2001 DOE Stormwater Management Manual Water -Stormwater Impacts:A Preliminary Storm Drainage Analysis prepared by PacLand dated December 14,2005 was submitted with the project application.According to the report,the existing surface water runoff sheet flows across the property from the east into onsite catch basins on the western side of the property,where it is then conveyed offsite through a 24 inch pipe that outfalls into the 72 inch public storm system in Garden Avenue N.The proposed method of drainage control is to collect the onsite stormwater runoff from the paved surfaces into catch basins and underground storm drainage pipes. The water will then be routed to two separate water quality compost stormwater filters for water quality treatment prior to discharging into the existing 72 inch stormwater conveyance pipe located in Garden Avenue N.The stormwater runoff from the building rooftop is collected and transported at the rear of the building and will bypass the water quality system and be discharged into the existing 72 inch stormwater conveyance pipe located in Garden Avenue N. Staff from the City's Plan Review Section have reviewed the report and note that the report addresses the requirements of the 1990 King County Surface Water Design Manual.Staff recommends as a mitigation measure that the project be required to comply with the 2001 Department of Ecology Stormwater Management Manual for water quality improvements. ERC rpt 05-161 City ofRenton P/B/PWDepartment "onmental Review Committee StaffReport LOWE'S OF RENTON LUA-05-161,SA-H,SA-M,ECF REPORTOFJUNE 27,2006 Page 5 of7 Miti.qation Measures:The project shall be required to comply with the 2001 Department of Ecology Stormwater Management Manual for water quality improvements. 3.Fire Protection Impacts:The proposed development will result in an overall increase of square footage of commercial development within the site.This increase is anticipated to create a need for additional fire protection services.Staff recommends a mitigation measure requiring payment of a Fire Mitigation Fee based on $0.52 per square foot of new building area for a current estimated total of $75,420.80.Fees are subject to change and are payable prior to the issuance of building permits. Mitiqation Measures:The applicant shall pay a Fire Mitigation Fee of $0.52 per square foot,for a current estimated total of $75,420.80.Fees are subject to change and are payable prior to the issuance of building permits. Policy Nexus:SEPA Environmental Regulations;Fire Mitigation Fee Resolution No.2913, Ordinance 4527. .Transportation Impacts:The applicant provided a Traffic Impact Analysis prepared by Kittelson &Associates,Inc., dated February 27,2006.The proposed development is anticipated to generate additional traffic on the City's street system.Approximately 3,815 new average daily trips are estimated to be generated by the proposed development,including 320 p.m.peak hour trips.Staff recommends the payment of a Traffic Mitigation Fee based on $75 per new average daily trip attributable to the project,for a current estimated total of $85,834.50.Fees are subject to change and are payable prior to the issuance of a building permit. Miti.qation Measures:The applicant shall pay a Transportation Mitigation Fee based on $75 per new average daily trip attributable to the project,for a current estimated total of $85,837.50.Fees are subject to change and are payable prior to the issuance of a building permit. . Policy Nexus:SEPA Environmental Regulations;Transportation Mitigation Fee Resolution No. 3100,Ordinance 4527. Historic Preservation: Im__pacts:Comments were received from the State Office of Archaeology and Historic Preservation suggesting that a professional archaeological survey be conducted for the site.The applicant has been advised in the project Advisory Notes to Applicant that should any archaeological deposits or human remains be encountered during project work,work shall immediately cease and the Washington State Office of Archaeology and Historic Preservation shall be notified. Miti,qation Measures:No mitigation is recommended. Nexus:N/A E.COMMENTS OF REVIEWING DEPARTMENTS The proposal has been circulated to City Departmental /Divisional Reviewers for their review. Where applicable,these comments have been incorporated into the text of this report as Mitigation Measures and/or Notes to Applicant. X Copies of all Review Comments are contained in the Official File. Copies of all Review Comments are attached to this report. ERC rpt 05-161 City ofRenton P/B/PW Department "onmentalReview Committee StaffReport LOWE'S OF RENTON LUA-05-161,SA-H,SA-M,ECF REPORT OFJUNE 27,2006 Page 6 of 7 Environmental Determination Appeal Process Appeals of the environmental determination must be filed in writing on or before 5:00 PM on July 14,2006 Appeals must be filed in writing together with the required $75.00 application fee with:Hearing Examiner,City of Renton,1055 South Grady Way,Renton,WA 98055.Appeals to the Examiner are governed by City of Renton Municipal Code Section 4-8-110.Additional information regarding the appeal process may be obtained from the Renton City Clerk's Office,(425)430-6510. Advisory Notes to Applicant: The following notes are supplemental information provided in conjunction with the environmental determination.Because these notes are provided as information only,they are not subject to the appeal process for environmental determinations. 1.Should any archaeological deposits or human remains be encountered during project work,work shall immediately cease and the Washington State Office of Archaeology and Historic Preservation shall be notified. Planninq 1.Commercial,multi-family,new single family and other nonresidential construction activities shall be restricted to the hours between seven o'clock (7:00)a.m.and eight o'clock (8:00)p.m.,Monday through Friday.Work on Saturdays shall be restricted to the hours between nine o'clock (9:00)a.m.and eight o'clock (8:00)p.m.No work shall be permitted on Sundays. 2.Should any archaeological deposits or human remains be encountered during project work,work shall immediately cease and the Washington State Office of Archaeology and Historic Preservation shall be notified. 1.Parking stalls must meet ADA requirements. 2.Building permit required for retaining walls greater or equal to four feet (4 ft.)in height. Construction Services 1.Fire separation distance is 20'at the rear lot line. Fire Department 1.The preliminary fire flow is 6,500 GPM.One hydrant is required within 150 ft of the structure.6 additional hydrants are required within 300 ft of the structure.One hydrant shall be added at the midpoint of the fire lane on the east side of the building.Applicant has shown hydrants to be installed along new water main. 2.For building permit review,provide a list of any flammable,combustible liquids or hazardous chemicals that may be used or stored on the site. 3.Separate plans and permits are required for the installation of fire sprinkler systems. 4.Fire Department access roads are required be within 150 ft of all portions of the building exteriors. 5.Fire Department dead end access roadways over 150 ft in length are required to have an approved turnaround. Transportation 1.The Washington State Department of Transportation has requested to review the Transportation Impact Analysis to determine if the proposed development will have any impacts on the State Highway System,particularly 1-405. If it is determined that impacts will result,mitigation may be required.Contact:Felix Palisoc,WSDOT Developer Services,(206)440-4713. Plan Review -General 1.All construction utility permits for utilities,drainage and street improvements will require separate plan submittals. All utility plans shall conform to the Renton Drafting Standards.Plans shall be prepared by a licensed Civil Engineer.When the utility plans are complete,please submit three (3)copies of the drawings,two (2)copies of the drainage report;permit application and an itemized cost of construction estimate and application fee at the counter on the sixth floor.Prior to preparing a check,it is recommended to call 425-430-7266 for a fee estimate as generated by the permit system 2.The fee for review and inspection of these improvements is 5%of the first $100,000 of the estimated construction costs;4%of anything over $100,000 but less than $200,000,and 3%of anything over $200,000.Half the fee must be paid upon application. 3.Separate permits for side sewer,domestic water meter,landscape irrigation meter and any backflow devices will be required. ERC rpt 05-161 City ofRenton P/B/PWDepartment onmentalReview Committee StaffReport LOWE'S OF RENTON LUA-05-161,SA-H,SA-M,ECF REPORT OF JUNE27,2006 Page 7 of7 4.Applicant shall be responsible for securing all necessary easements for utilities. 5.All new rockeries or retaining walls to be constructed that are greater than 4 feet in height will be require a separate building permit.Proper drainage measures are required. 6.All wire utilities shall be installed underground per the City of Renton Under Grounding Ordinance.If three or more poles are required to be moved by the development design,all existing overhead utilities shall be placed underground.7.All plans shall conform to the Renton Drafting Standards. Plan Review -Surface Water 1.Application for commercial building permits will trigger a separate review of surface water and storm drainage design. 2.Final location of the storm drainage lines will be determined during review of the civil engineering plans to be submitted after preliminary approval. 3.No Surface Water System Development Charges are owed on this site. 4.There is an existing 48"storm pipe and a 72"storm pipe in Garden Ave N. 5.Applicant has submitted a drainage report and drainage plans for review.Preliminary review shows that applicant has addressed the general requirements per the 1990 KCSWM,however revisions to the report will be required at civil plan submittal. Plan Review-Sanitary Sewer 1.Application for commercial building permits will trigger a separate review of sanitary sewer design. 2.If any uses are proposed that will likely result in discharge of oil or grease,a grease removal system shall be installed,of a design to be determined at the time of final plan review.A separate plumbing permit will be required for installations inside the building. 3.The Sanitary Sewer System Development Charge is $0.142 per sq ft.This fee is collected at the time that the utility permit is issued. Plan Review -Water1.A Water System Development Charge (SDC)of $116,392.19 is owed on this site.The rate is based on 426,345 square feet x $0.273.This is payable at the time the utility permit is issued. 2.A water main extension is required.Applicant has shown a looped 12-inch main around the building. 3.A fire sprinkler system is required by the fire department.A separate utility permit and separate plans will be required for the installation of all double detector check valve assemblies for fire sprinkler systems.All devices installed shall be per the latest Department of Health "Approved List"of Backflow Prevention Devices.Location of device shall be shown on the civil plans and shall show note:"Separate plans and utility permit for DDCVA installation for Fire Sprinkler System will be required".DDCVA installations outside the building shall be in accordance with the City of Renton Standards.For DDCVA installations proposed to be installed inside the building,applicant shall submit a copy of the mechanical plan showing the location and installation of the backflow assembly inside the mechanical room.Installation shall be in accordance with the City of Renton's requirements. DDCVA shall be installed immediately after the pipe has passed through the building floor slab.Installation of devices shall be in the horizontal position only.A separate utility permit and separate plans will be required for the installation of the double detector check valve assembly for the fire sprinkler system,if backflow device is to be installed inside the building. 4.If the building exceeds 30 feet in height,a backflow device will be required to be installed on the domestic water meter.Due to high water pressure,a pressure-reducing valve will also be required on the domestic water meter. 6.Landscape irrigation systems will require a separate permit for the irrigation meter and approved backflow device is required to be installed.A plumbing permit will be required. Plan Review -Street Improvements 1.Half-street improvements including City standard 5-ft sidewalk,curb cuts,curb,gutter,paving,storm drainage and streetlights are required to be installed in Garden Ave.N. 2.All wire utilities shall be installed underground per the City of Renton Undergrounding Ordinance.If 3 or more poles are required to be moved by the development design,all existing overhead utilities shall be placed underground. ERC rpt 05-161 | 18om ! / / If-/ .4.g -I 2JIN b ii " J I IIllll!ii! / I-f [ i / ! +o®®®Q 1-t 'iI ,,,',, !!.i \ !I++i +"---[,,i.i.+aILOWo I',o.LOglE'S"lll!il!l••I ;.'--.'",ii11+1,I ° D4 o 5 TZ3N RSE W z 0 / UC-N1 UC-NI JI-N1 UC-I JC?N I N2 ",\XXXX '%,",i %.i ""'"I":::: 'i // 92 BO0 R4E L It,,ES.I,EF,UJA], Resource Conservation F'Residential I du/ac Residential 4 du/ao Resldential 8 du/ac H-Resldentlal Manufactured Homes Residentin]10 du/ac Residential 14 du/ac -Residential Multi-Family Residential MulU-Family Traditional 7 ResidenUal Multi-Family Urban Center* MIXED USE CENTF.R F-Centor Village 7 Urban Center -North I ''-N'Urban Center -North Z Center Downtown* F-R-I Cornmerelal/Office/Resldential COMMERC Commercial Arterial• Commercial Office° Commercial Neighborhood \, Industrial -Heavy Industrial -Medium -industrial -Light (P)Publicly owned --Renton City Limits ----Adjacent City Limits Book Pages Boundary "May include Overlay Districts.See Appendixmaps.For additional regulations in OverlayDistricts,please see RMC 4-3, Pdnted by Pnnt&Mail Set'ice s,City ofRentotl KROLL PAGE# SECT/TOWN/RANGE PAGE HNDEX :.::CITY RENTON _____']-'.:',-:'i .:.'Plannini[ding/Public,oi-k s D,pait.ment i . ]a.-LO ;:Kath Keolker,Mayor <!"-'t.','":.GreggZimmerman PE.i A(liriinistrator. PACLAND ",-.1i235 SE 6!h Street.#220 Beilevue,-WA.98004 .:.. ,,...... 4 •7 .';.L ':"- ".•., •,.. •Subjec;t:'.LoWe'sofRentgniLUA05.:161,.SA-H,SA-M,ECF Off Hold-,_". ..:::i;:'..7:,i ,'".:::•:.'-,....... •'-_r ,,,Dear Mi'."Neer:.......,<,.;.: "Thank.:you ,for submitting:the .addit!onai.materials,i'equested,::in-the Aprii20th letterffrOm ....." "the City:Your project has been takerl :Off:h0id -arid41e C tywi cont nue/rev ew:of the - LowesofRentonproject;'.--,.-•".... '"->'(he ::preliminary plat h&s been r.esCheduled for Envirdnnnefital.Review:C0mmittee:0n .:.--Juiie2#thind is tentatively scheduied togobefore the Hea'71"ng:i:iExaminer on Julyri8!.at;...-..'9:00 am::lf'you .have any questions;.pleasecontactme af425-430:7219.".;...:.'.-; ;-::..Sincerely;.'""":i :"-:":.'"''i",..':/;"'"".:.;: •i,,,Senii*tkJ'6Panner"..,:..,,,:./:,,? •...,,, File ••iPartis of record{,-.,., ."''L","' •.,..( ""+.• j;- ..,.. '<;::..-'. ., ''"i ..,-•,,- •.,., '% 7¸ ,,'.. ..,:...i , •t 105,5 S0uth Gt,ady Way-Renton,washingtoi 98655-,..,. ,.•..".•/J .'Thispapercontains50%recycledmaterial.30%postconsumer > .>..,.,, •:.,•,.., ,i'.•,. °. ..... AHEAD O.F,THE CURVE SSOE,INC. ARCHITECTS.ENGINEERS June 19,2006 Jennifer Henning Senior Planner City of Renton,WA 1055 South Grady Way Renton,WA 98055 RE:Lowes of Renton Request For Additional Information -Planning comment LUA05-161,SA-H SSOE Project No.05-5189-00 2121 17th Avenue SE,Ste.225iothell,WA 98021-7405 elephone 425.827.2950acsimile425.827.8412 ,ww,ssoe.co m Dear Jennifer, Our resubmittal drawings,appended to this letter have been revised to address the architectural responses to the staff comments from Keri Weaver dated April 20. Plus a request for an administrative code modifications pertaining to the required square footage amount for the stores refuse.Listed below are plan review responses to your comments. Buildin,cl Comments Item 5.Additional articulation and variation of the fagade on the west and south sides of the building should be provided to visually reduce the scale of the building'...... Response:An entrance tower has been added adjacent to the drive thru canopy along Garden Avenue.This tower will denote the pedestrian access/entrance to the site.Additional pilasters have been added to the facade along Garden Avenue.These pilasters area raised above grade and do not add to the foundation system of the store.This design feature will not add to the encroachment into the utility easement along this side of the building. Additional pilasters have been added along the front elevation facing the parking area to add articulation to that facade. Item 6."provide screening detail plan...." Response:The screen walls around the staging area have been modified to a solid CMU wall,as opposed to the fencing previously proposed.This will screen the staging area along Park Avenue and Garden Avenue. Administrative Code Modification Request Lowe's is requesting an administrative code modification request pertaining to code 4-4-090 E.5,regarding the required square footage for refuse for retail development. This code amounts to a tota_l of 1280square foot required for store refuse deposit area;Lowe's is proposing 684 square foot area for refuse for the proposed store instead.The 684 square foot area is the recommended size by Lowe's Store C:\dgn\dms20191\Letter Renton to Planning Dept 6-19-06.do0 Jennifer Henning Senior Planner City of Renton June 19,2006 •Page 2 of 2 Planning Department.The area includes an industrial strength trash compactor that will be emptied on an on call basis.Please note that we are asking for a modification request only for the refuse deposit area;Lowe's does have a designated recycling deposit area within the proposed staging area of 640 square feet. I trust you will find all in order and will advise us directly should any additional information be required.Please feel free to call me or Laura Orlich at 425-827-2950, or Mike Neer of Pacland at (425)453-9501 should you have any questions. Sincerely, SSOE,Inc. West Coast Business Leader SSOE Retail SBU CO:Jim Manion -Lowe's Laura Orlich -SSOE Inc. Mike Neer-PaclandSSOEefile C:\dgn\dms20191\Letter Renton to Planning Dept 6-19-06.doc Washington Sae Depa'ent o Yzaspotion Dougnas B.IViacDonald Secretary of Transportation April28,2006 Keri Weaver City of Renton Planning 1055 South Grady Way Renton,WA 98055 Northwest Region 15700 Dayton Avenue North P.O.Box 330310 Seattle,WA 98133-9710 206-440-4000 TTY:1-800-833-6388 www.wsdot.wa.gov °=l.tcr6N ,rvu t Ay .2 2oo6. Subject:Loew's of Renton (128,277 ft2 retail) LUA05-161,SA-H,SA-M,ECF SR 405 MP 4.5 (SR 900 vicinity) Dear Ms.Weaver: The Washington State Department of Transportation (WSDOT)hasreviewed the Transpoi'tation Impact Analysis (TIA)submitted for the above referenced project.Prior to the listing of specific comments,please note that it is impossible to discern from this TIA,as written,whether or not the proposed development will have any impact on SR 405 or SR 900, both of which are well within the vicinity of this project.The specific comments below reflect the most obvious omissions that need to be addressed prior to next submittal. .In the next submittal,please be sure to analyze existing,future without the project and future with the project conditions with turning movements at the following intersections: a.NE Park Dr /SR 405 SR ramp terminal b.NE Park DR /SR 405 NB off ramp terminal It is likely that the intersections noted above will be impacted by the proposed development.Therefore,it is essential that they be included in the TIA study in order to determine the degree and type of impact. 2.In addition to determining the existing and future levels of service at the above noted intersections,be sure to review and comment on their recent accident history.The ....-.intersection of NE Park Dr /SR 405 NB off-ramp and the SR 405 SB on ramp are both ::listed as 2004 High Accident Locations (HALs).Please consider and comment on the potential safety impact that the proposed development may have at tfiese locations. .Though the existing TIA cites the ITE Trip Generation Manual,7th Edition as the resource for estimating trips generated by the proposed development,there is no indication of the land use assignment,the method used to determine the appropriate trip C:\Felix DevServ\SEPA_ResponsesksepaRENTON_SR405MP5Lowes_TIA2City.doc SR 405 (SR 900 vicinity) Lowe's of Renton Page 2 of 2 . , generation rate,or what rate was applied to calculate net new trips.Though not stated in this TIA,the proposed development clearly fits the Home Improvement Superstore land use (862)category as described in the ITE Manual.Please document and explain the land use category used in your analysis.Please provide sufficient information in your next submittal so that rates,calculations,etc.,can be verified during review.Also, please consider and document the trip generation that is likely to occur during the weekday am peak hour of generator and the Saturday peak hour of generator.Both of these trip generation rates are higher than the rate applied to the pm peak hour of adjacent side street (in this case,Garden Ave.N.).Given the existing density and land uses present in this highly developed area,existing congestion,and close proximity of multiple State Routes (SR 405,SR 900,and SR 169)it is imperative that the peak daily and weekend trip generations be determined and analyzed to be certain that the TIA for the proposed development has identified all possible timeframes during which degradation to a State Route's level of service may occur. In your next submittal,please note the year of construction completion and full occupancy for the Fry's Electronics store south of the proposed development.Please explain whether or not the traffic volumes used in the analysis include the trips that were generated as a result of this recent development. When analyzing and reporting the results of your impact analysis,please be sure to include LOS,signal delay,and 95th percentile queue results in all scenarios,i.e., existing,future without project,future with project. If you have any questions,or require additional information please contact Felix Palisoc of our Developer Services section by phone at 206-440-4713,or via e-mail at palisof@wsdot.wa.gov. Sincery, Local Agency and Development Services Manager RP:fsp CC:Day file R.Roberts,MS 120 C:\Felix_DevServ\SEPA_ResponsesksepaRENTON_SR405MP5Lowes_TIA2City.doc IT¥OF RENTONC [÷ ["}:÷ ]Planning/Building/PublicWorks Department April 20,2006 Steve PescePACLAND 11235 SE 6t"St,Suite 220 Bellevue,I WA 98004 Subject:L0we's of Renton LUA05-161,SA-H Dear Mr.Pesce: During review of the above-described project application staff has determined that additional information will be required in order to continue processing the application: •The utility p!an dated 1/31/2006 indicates that the Lowe's buildingis proposed to be placed approximately 6 ft into the"east side of a 20-ft City of Renton stormwater •easement that runs along the propertyboundary next to Garden Ave N.It appears that the west building wall will be placedless than 2'ft:from a major 72"-.stormwater pipe located in that easement.Staff is concerned about the.potential impacts of pile driving for foundation pier placement Upon the pipe;and about the.City's abilitY to conduct future in- "ground work for pipe maintenance or replacement in such Close proXimity to building •walls.Additionally,the geotechfiicall;repOrt prepared by GeoEngineers,Inc.,dated 1/26/2006,specifically discusses the:;potmtial for damage•to the stormwater pipe as a result of pile-driving activities.The site:is Within a mapped.Seismic •Hazard Area in which •building and perimeter settling are..ialso likely,and this may also affectthe post- construction stability and integrity of the :pipe..The City has not approved placement of the Lowe's building within thestormwater-easement,and at this time staff is not recommending approval. The applicant should Consider revising the building design to prevent encroachment into the easement.If the applicant wishe.:to continue with the current site plan,it will be necessary to justify the necessity of the proposed,encroachment and demonstrate how -construction will be conducted in a Safe manner that does not damage City property. The proposed wall location and pile driving adjacent to the storm line must be reviewed. by a geotechnical consultant.Prior to construction,the applicant would be required to TV inspect.the storm lineto determinethe pre-construction pipe condition.]'he tape must be provided to the City prior to issuance :of construction permits.A post,construction TV inspection and City review would also be required.City inspectors would need to be .notified and onsite when the TV inspections are performed.During Constructionl the •"invert elevations and rim elevations at manhole structures closest to the wall construction would require monitoring for any settlement;along with the surface area:above the pipe. If the pipe is damaged during construCtion,or if damage is identified during the one-year ; period following final acceptance or occupancy,the developer would be required to repair the damage or compensate the Cityforthe cost to •repairthe damage. •.Transportation Planning staff have.requesteda meeting with Lowe's site and 'transportation engineers to discuss several concerns,including proposed Houser Way modifications and the alignment Of the north driveway onto Garden Ave N.The coordination of this meeting is in process. 1055 South Grady Way -Renton,Washington 98055 AHEAD OF THE CURVE '.• •'-'i.' ..-•,.-; Steve Pesce LUA05-161 Ap£il 20,2006 Page2 of 2 ..... © •...•.•.••'-••, ".....o T0.ensure•.that the proposed use.of tle existing BNSF crossing easement on Houser •Way is feasible pleaseprovide a copy of the easement for City review,alOng withany"'•"other permission or permits:that L0we's has received from BNSF..The St0neway --ComPany,located adjacent to the east-side of the .Lowe's siteimay als0 need .to be •"contacted regarding any paving or other road improvements that it has Conducted in that •area,if modifications will be necessary.'-. '.,<Half-street improvements includingCity-standard sidewalks,Curb cuts,gutter,pavement, ..-.:,storm drainage and street lights are required to be.installed in Garden Ave•N.Please .--note that landscape planting areas,street trees,and sidewalk design along Garden Ave ..N must,match and connect to the existing layout to the south that was installed for the ,.Fry's site.Please revise the site plan•and landscape plan for consistencywith-these .requirements.If you require copies of the approved landscape and street design plans •for Fry's,please contact me..... •-•o.Additional requirements oftheUrban Center Design Overlay Regulations .(RMC 4-3-100) should.be incorporated intothe site plan revision.The building entry is required to be -connected to the public sidewalk frontiriiGardenAve N.A pedestrian walkway system should also be indicated,-,ii4ciuding'amarked crosswalk.that connects the building and <parking lot with the adjacent EryS pr,bperty.Parkin'g lot sidewalks,should be placed• ...perpendicular to the.bUiiding :fade;spaced no more.i!han 150 ft apart.Additional'articulation and variation Of thefa(;ade on the ,est and SOcitb sides of the .building should .. ..be provided,to Visually reduce the scale of the building.'•.,.,.,, "....',',<."..";<.•..,•'•. o --Please provide,screening detail plar ior pi'oposedi0ading docks,dumpster and Outside •service/storage areas consistent.w thlthe requirements of RMC 4-4-095 (screening and .Storage Height/Location:Limitation),and RMC 4-3-100.;"i.It is particularly impor!ant to provide adequate screening on thel-north Side of the building since the eievation of Park.".Ave Will make this side.especially visibJe to passing vehicle-and pedestrian traffiC. ',At this.time,the project has,been,Piaced on hold pending receipt of the requested informati0n. •,'''r"•.Once the requested informatiori "has been-received,the revJew'.Will Continue and the project.can be scheduled .for a public hearing,i"pleise contact me .at .(425)•430,7382 if you have .any .questions......,.......:.:'i. 'Sincerely,'"'"""-,..... ------."''"."KeriA.Weaver,AICP '."....,.-Senior Planner ,. Cc:Neil Watts . Jennifer Henning .." •Rich Parteet •-. Alex Pietsch .,Ben Wolters Ron Straka ..-Rebecca Lind Jan Illian Bob Mahn PLANNING/BUILDING/ PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT MEMORANDUM DATE: TO: FROM: SUBJECT: April 19,2006 Keri Weaf)evelopment Services Bob MahrrI'ransportation Planning Loews Hardware Store Garden Avenue North/North Park Drive Review of the Traffic Impact Analysis (TIA)dated February 2006 for the subject development has resulted in the following comments: The TIA does not address traffic volumes generated by The Landing development.The 2007 traffic analysis at the designated intersections with and without the Loews development should have included traffic volumes anticipated to be generated by The Landing.Also, street improvements to serve The Landing site,particularly along Garden Avenue North, should have been reflected in the TIA (i.e.the new North 10th Street will intersect Garden Avenue North opposite the south driveway to be shared by Loews and Fry's).We would like to meet with you to discuss the possibility of the TIA being revised by Loews traffic engineering consultant. We question whether the WB67 trucks leaving the Loews site via the existing road easement at the northeast corner of the site can make the right-turn movement onto Houser Way.Also, the existing BNSF crossing easement may need to be modified (or new easement)to reflect any additional easement area to accommodate trucks leaving the site.The foregoing concerns have been addressed further,along with other concerns regarding the width of the Houser Way and Garden Avenue roadways in an April 19,2006,e-mail (copy attached). Because of our concerns regarding the width of the Garden Avenue roadway,we would like to meet with you to discuss the potential of Loews widening Garden Avenue as part of the Code-required off-site improvements. •The trip generation estimates (3,815 total daily trips;320 total PM peak hour trips)presented in the TIA are acceptable. A temporary traffic signal is planned at the intersection of the combined Loews/Fry's driveway with Garden Avenue when Garden Avenue is a detour route during closure of Park Avenue North within The Landing site.This traffic signal will help Fry's customer /delivery traffic and Loews'construction traffic to access Garden Avenue during the detour period. We will need a temporary easement from Loews,and from Fry's,for signal loops,pavement markings,etc.within the driveway at its approach to Garden Avenue.Widening of the existing driveway and driveway approach to the north is also anticipated to accommodate a three-lane approach. •tw Keri Weaver Page 2 of 2 April 19,2006 The preliminary site plan indicates that curb returns,versus standard driveways,are planned at both the north and south driveways.We recommend that the curb returns (or standard driveway)at the south driveway be designed to accommodate the size of trucks (WB67?)that will be using this driveway. Attachment:April 19,2006 E-mail CC Peter Hahn,Deputy Administrator -Transportation Rich Perteet,Interim Transportation Design,Planning &Programming Supervisor Kayren Kittrick,Development Services Supervisor Jan Illian,Development Services File h:\division.s\transpor.tat\planning\rlm\reviewsk2OO6\loewshardware store.doc BoD Mn Re:Houser Wa]'aqe'............l:::utl From:Rich Perteet To:Hahn,Peter;Pietsch,Alexander; Date:4/19/2006 1:46:46 PM Subject:Re:Houser Way Zimmerman,Gregg Alex, This issue opens a real can of worms.We have several major truck generators adjacent to the Landing project,and the new retail stores will also generate a significant amount of new truck traffic (hopefully off-peak hour).Lowe's truck traffic is another major concern.Garden is a logical truck route but it is only 40 feet wide and is stripped for 4 traffic lanes (!). Houser Way is one-way southbound from Lake Washington Blvd to a point south of the driveway entrance into the north part of the Lowe's site.This driveway is currently one-way southbound as well.Obviously part of the old traffic mitigation for Boeing.BNSF,the City,and Stoneway are all apparently involved to some extent in this area of the street.We seem to have a permanent road easement from BNSF. Stoneway has paved a large area that is probably BNSF property,and they may have some sort of permit from the RR. Short answer to your question is we do not know.The.engineers for Lowes need todo some homework and present us with a plan.We do not have sufficient staff to really research this question.Absent further infromation from Lowe's,they have not presented us with an acceptable solution. We want to work out these (and other)access issues,and bring all of this to a successful conclusion.I suggest that a meeting be set up between Lowe's engineers and me,Rob,and Bob Mahn. By the way,Houser Way is also only 40 feet wide.Two lanes with parking on both sides of the street. LOTS of trucks already,and really too narrow for two lanes with parking on both sides.We have to consider the impact on that street as well. We also would like to get a handle on the number of trucks per day,and any restrictions they may have on when deliveries are accepted by them. Rich >>>Alexander Pietsch 04/19106 11:18 AM >>> What is the status of Houser Way?Lowe's is inquiring if they can use it for two-way freight traffic.They seem to think that it is one way only now.True?Can we change that? Alex Pietsch Administrator Dept.of Economic Development, Neighborhoods &Strategic Planning City of Renton 425.430.6592 voice 425.430.7300 fax www.rentonmarket.com www.ci.renton.wa.us CO:Hamilton,Karl;Lochmiller,Robert;Mahn,Bob;Weaver,Keri ,J ! PLANNING/BUILDING/ PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT MEMORANDUM DATE: TO: FROM: STAFF CONTACT: SUBJECT: April 17,2006 Neil Watts,Development Services Director / Lys Hornsby,Utility Systems Director 4,'t'-CO. Ron Straka,Surface Water Utility Supervisor (ext.7248) Lowe's Store Storm Water Easement Encroachment The proposed Lowe's Store at Garden Avenue N and Sunset in Renton proposes to locate the wall of the store within an existing 20-ft utility easement that is parallel to the Garden Avenue N right- of-way line.The existing 20-fl easement is occupied by a 72-inch diameter storm pipe.The building wall is proposed to be located approximately 5-fl from the center of the pipe.This would mean that the wall would be placed less than 2-ft from the outside wall of the pipe.In addition,the building wall will be pile supported,which means that there will be pile driving very close to this pipe. City code adopts the 1990 King County Surface Water Design Manual (KCSWDM),which requires that easements for pipes that are greater than 60-inches to be inside pipe diameter plus 10-ft (ID+I0-ft).The required minimum easement width is 16-fi for a 72-inch storm line.In addition,the 1990 KCSWDM requires that a minimum ofa 10-ft building setback from the easement line. In 2002,the enclosed letter from the Development Services Director indicated that the City would allow the building wall to be located 2-ft inside of the eastern easement line,but made no mention ofthe required building setback from the easement line.The letter also states that the City's preference to this easement reduction be limited to no more than 5-ft. The location of the wall within the existing 20-fl easement,especially 2-fl from the outside wall of the pipe as proposed,does not meet City code.To meet City code,the wall must be placed a minimum of 18-fl from the center of the pipe.The City has an existing 20-ft easement right and could require,in order to protect the City's infrastructure,that the building wall be located 10-feet from the existing 20-ft easement or 20-fi from the center of the pipe.The Surface Water Utility recommends that the building wall be placed 18-ft from the center of the existing 72-inch storm pipe,since that is required by City code.The Surface Water Utility does not recommend allowing the wall be placed within the existing 20-fl existing utility easement. It appears the encroachment into the easement area and non-compliance with the building setback requirements from the easement is due to the required 20-ft fire lane along the east side of the building.A review of the fire lane should be done to verify that it is needed.If it is not needed, then the building could be shifted to the east and the encroachment and building setback from the easement could possibly be met.The line could also be relocated to be closer to Garden Avenue Watts/Lowe's Encroachm.O April 17,2006 Page 2 of 2 by the Development,at the Developers cost,in order to resolve the encroachment into the easement and non-compliance with City code. The Surface Water Utility also recommends that the following conditions be required ofthe project prior to and during construction to ensure that the project does not damage the City's infrastructure: 1.A review of the proposed wall location and pile driving adjacent to tile existing 72- inch storm line to determine if it will impact the storm system structurally or cause settlement and pipe separation by an independent geotechnical consultant. 2.Prior to construction,tile Development proponent or representative shall TV inspect the existing 72-inch storm line adjacent to where the proposed wall is located to establish a pre-construction pipe condition.The TV tape shall be provided to the City prior to the issuance of the project construction permit.Upon completing wall construction and pile driving on-site,a post-construction TV inspection shall be performed and the tape provided to the City to review.City inspectors shall be notified and on-site when TV inspections (pre and post-construction)are performed. 3.During construction the invert elevations and rim elevations at manhole structures associated with the 72-inch storm system,closest to the wall construction,shall be monitored for any settlement,along with the surface area above the pipe. 4.If the pipe is damaged during construction,or if damage is identified within one-year following final acceptance or occupancy,the developer will be responsible to repair the damage or the cost for the City to repair the damage. The existing 72-inch concrete storm pipe is a major storm interceptor.It serves an upstream tributary basin area ofapproximately 744 acres and can convey approximately 300-400 cubic-feet per second for the 25-yr and 100-yr storms respectively.Any damage or failure to this storm system could result in have significant damages. In conclusion,the wall should be a minimum of 18-ft frorn the center of the existing 72-inch storm pipe,per City code.The Surface Water Utility does not recommend reducing the width of the existing easement right or allowing the building wall to be located within the existing 20-ft easement.This is to ensure our ability to maintain,repair and replace this line and to minimize the cost to the City's ratepayers.In addition,prior to and during construction the above reviews, inspection and monitoring should be required. If you have any questions or need additional information,please contact Ron Straka. Enclosure cc:Gregg Zimmerman,PBPW Administrator Michael Stenhouse,Maintenance Director Allen Quynn,Surface Water Engineer Keri Weaver,Development Services Senior PlannerJanlllian,Plan Review Engineering Specialist H:Wile Sys\SWP -Surface Water Projects\SWP 27-Surface Water Projects (Plan Review)\Lowes Store\Storm WaterEasementEncroachment.doc\RStp Sent By:Seattle Pac.11c ReaLty;(206)669-0259;Aug,25-05 8:45AM;Page ;2/3......."'--L,,,-=,425 430 7380 P.O2 ...."*-'Z.*'"'_"..............;,...... Aus 15,2}2 ,lQck Clwdm lO04"J'hil AvBun.Sui 710VIA98101 Thank you far the oppany to me w€5 you d clisca the prepocd Taqjet rmn dc,vclopme m t 10UUzasl ccnMr of Garden A'mmz N m4 P1Bk Avmu¢N.Baaed upoa € •pmlimincr tits pLaa llfOlsmd by the LR Group (dated 04r,W)tl proposed Iikll fooqim vxdd be allowed 5j,-tbo 1.Fedform ipulMlng Code for Type LLedted area €onsmicSon.We mcommead the bulldidZ be a.d sliidly east to provide cicanmce from the "/2"¢ooa -,wet main lhz walt portion K the site.This caa be accomplisbed tO reduclnc tt mtiack from the u prepay tim m-cm to the ndS'to 20 feet..foopflnt can .ira bo moved north to dlo far ddltid wldn6 n somb of.d bui]dhtS.' doo .2 of th Ufotm lioUdl C.allow,for fez o o two buildinS,,•a oupm (n,)it (l)IdksS I,provided with B qq,rm .tomadc spdnlde,r lyscm thruho buda a!(2)the is endndy suerotuled and aone by public wlys m ymds oot II thin 0 fret ia widlh.For pWlml o dds Icad.dse Cty mmaJ Open for tiN,fl¢life of 11 Idi I.laQIIJ fm d.TarGet •smm,nl shown a Ih inmlmu?dtc pla,will curacy with wd¢knKikcant of',¢tiOn.2.ead ,he ack from I out i'?ik eent m d ndim,l ran [wdw nfuced I0 20 fu,"De 20 f001 |etick Is the m!aimm'n'requmm.n¢for aqp-ale di a|d¢ of bl buHdiat, The pt I s 20 fax 0dlity eam€l (to the City)slontt the portion of lmPiY, Ucem to Cude Avlma N.There is a 72"t¢¢m jcv mdn this eascmr which is Iocmd appsuinmly flv (5)feat from the we "prepay line o cemt r the pipe.y movis¢thz pmpoe IxdidinJI foatps 1 !fcet ea.d Ix€linj¢would r4UI I wlUda th easterly two (2}f of 20 fOOl udlt(),€.,is ccablz to tS City.The prdoo of the easement aeeded'macccn'mmxte tld,bIdLn s fomlxrlm bs nlJui by the Cky to removennypotmiltideimeftheaewbufldins,Jt ia aur pcm that Itda ,,na 'loclion I Iimill to no than a fiw O)foot wh redulon.nli a minlmwn 15 foot amem aloq A,lSm N, Titere is an exiin 8,d=ivwiy cona¢cslon from tbe uon;€ro¢o the property which should nain Is 01'Ihe site p]Im.Tldl paved ddveWly ivil l COfi138€|1 (Houser Way €lx cite milsd uks out o the si "r dlo plan Ibows Widn spaces Iocklag tSener,whlelt is to renaln open. -.....,.......... :O.m-m,,am,w .•&Mil41 IIP Tlfil ¢IIIV& RUG 25 2885 11:4256"9132 PAGE.82 ent By:.Seetle Pc,flc Fieslty;(208)889-025g; -4.¢r'-.,n¢zjo A ,!i y K'I=N0;J:N ! Aug-25-05 8:45At;Page 313 f *°. o',.'• ,o" = AUG 25 2005 11:3E)4256?09132 TOTRL P,83 PAGE.03 CITY OF RENTON MEMORANDUM DATE: TO: FROM: SUBJECT: March 21,2006 Keri Weaver Jan Illian x7216 LOWES HARDWARE 800 -Garden Ave North LUA 05-161 I have reviewed the application for Lowes Hardware to be located at 800 -Garden Ave North and have the following comments: EXISTING CONDITIONS WATER There is an existing 12-inch water main in Garden Ave North.Pressure in the vicinity is approximately 125 psi.The proposed project is located in the 320 Pressure Zone and is not inside an Aquifer Protection Zone.Derated fire flow available in the vicinity is 6,000 gpm. SEWER There is an existing 8-inch sewer main in Garden Ave North. STORM There are existing storm facilities in Garden Ave North. STREETS There is an asphalt walk,curb,and gutter fronting the property in Garden Ave North. CODE REQUIREMENTS WATER 1.A Water System Development Charge (SDC)of $2,582.31 is owed on this site.The rate is based on 9,459 square feet x $0.273.This is payable at the time the utility permit is issued. 2.A water main extension is required.Applicant has shown a looped 12-inch main around the building. 3.Preliminary fire flow determined by the fire department is 6,500 gpm.Fire Department has determined that the flow demand available is acceptable to serve this site.One hydrant must be within 150 feet from the structure and six additional hydrants will be required within 300 feet of the structure.Applicant has shown hydrants to be installed along the new water main. 4.A fire sprinkler system is required by the fire department.A separate utility permit and separate plans will be required for the installation of all double detector check valve assemblies for fire sprinkler systems.All devices installed shall be per the latest Department of Health "Approved List"of Backflow Prevention Devices.Location of device shall be shown on the civil plans and shall show note:"Separate plans and utility permit for DDCVA installation for Fire Sprinkler System will be required".DDCVA installations outside the building shall be in accordance with the City of Renton Standards. For DDCVA installations proposed to be installed inside the building,applicant shall submit a copy of the mechanical plan showing the location and installation of the backflow assembly inside the mechanical room. Installation shall be in accordance with the City of Renton's requirements. . , DDCVA shall be installed immediately after the pipe has passed through the building floor slab.Installation of devices shall be in the horizontal position only.A separate utility permit and separate plans will be required for the installation of the double detector check valve assembly for the fire sprinkler system,ifbackflow device is to be installed inside the building. If the building exceeds 30 feet in height,a backflow device will be required to be installed on the domestic water meter.Due to high water pressure,a pressure-reducing valve will also be required on the domestic water meter. Landscape irrigation systems will require a separate permit for the irrigation meter and approved backflow device is required to be installed.A plumbing permit will be required. SANITARY SEWER 1 A Sewer System Development Charge (SDC)of $1,343.18 is owed on this site.The rate is based on 9,459 square feet x $0.142.This is payable at the time the utility permit is issued. 2.If food preparation facilities are proposed,a grease trap or grease interceptor will be required.A separate plumbing permit will be required for installations inside the building. 3.A sewer main extension is not required. SURFACE WATER 1.No Surface Water System Development Charges are owed on this site. 2.There is an existing 48"storm pipe system in Garden Ave N. 3.Applicant has submitted a drainage report and drainage plans for review.Preliminary review shows that applicant has addressed the general requirements per the 1990 KCSWM,however revisions to the report will be required at civil plan submittal. STREET IMPROVEMENTS 1.Half street improvements including city standard 5-foot sidewalk,curb cuts,curb,gutter,paving,storm drainage and streetlights are required to be installed in Garden Ave N. 2.All wire utilities shall be installed underground per the City of Renton Undergrounding Ordinance.If three or more poles are required to be moved by the development design,all existing overhead utilities shall be placed underground. 3.The driveway locations shown on the revised site plan are acceptable. GENERAL COMMENTS 1.All construction utility permits for utilities,drainage and street improvements will require separate plan submittals.All utility plans shall conform to the Renton Drafting Standards.Plans shall be prepared by a licensed Civil Engineer. 2.When the utility plans are complete,please submit three (3)copies of the drawings,two (2)copies of the drainage report;permit application and an itemized cost of construction estimate and application fee at the counter on the sixth floor.A fee worksheet is attached for your use,but prior to preparing a check,it is recommended to call 425-430-7266 for a fee estimate as generated by the permit system The fee for review and inspection of these improvements is 5%of the first $100,000 of the estimated construction costs;4%of anything over $100,000 but less than $200,000,and 3%ofanything over $200,000. Half the fee must be paid upon application. MISCELLANEOUS 1.Separate permits for side sewer,domestic water meter,landscape irrigation meter and any backflow devices will be required. 2.Applicant shall be responsible for securing all necessary casements for utilities. 3.All new rookeries or retaining walls to be constructed that are greater than 4 feet in height will be require a scparate building permit.Proper drainage measures are required. .All wire utilities shall be installed underground per the City of Renton Under Grounding Ordinance.If three or more poles are required to be moved by the development design,all existing overhead utilities shall be placed underground. RECOMMENDED CONDITIONS 1.The traffic mitigation fees will be assessed at $85,837.50.See attached Mitigation Fee Report 2.Staff recommends a SEPA condition requiring this project to design and comply with Department of Ecology's Erosion and Sediment Control Requirements,outlined in Volume II of the 2001 Stormwater Management Manual. 3.Staff recommends a SEPA condition requiring this project to design and comply with the 2005 King County Surface Water Design Manual to meet both detention (Conservation Flow control -a.k.a.Level 2)and water quality improvements. CC:Kayren Kittrick City.tenton Department ofPlanning /Building /P Works ENVIRONMENTAL &DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET APPLICATION NO:LUA05-161,SA-H,SA-M,ECF APPLICANT:Jim Manion,Lowe's HIW PROJECT TITLE:Lowe's of Renton SITE AREA:9.79 acres LOCATION:800 Garden Avenue N COMMENTS DUE:MARCH 22,2006 DATE RECIRCULATED:MARCH 8,2006 PROJECT MANAGER:Keri Weaver PLAN REVIEW:Jan Illian RECFIVED =,,iMrt IU ,,j BUILDING AREA (gross):128,277 square fetILDING DIVISION WORK ORDER NO:77528 SUMMARY OF PROPOSAL:Applicant is requesting master plan and site development plan approval and SEPA review,for a Lowe's Home Improvement retail store totalling 128,277 sq.ft.with a 28,712 sq.ft.garden area and 428 parking spaces.The site is located at 800 Garden Ave.N,at the intersection of Park Ave.N and Garden Ave.N. PLEASE NOTE:Revised Site Plan,additional reports/studies:Geotechinical Study,Environmental Site Assessment & Groundwater Sampling Report &Traffic Impact Analysis A.ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT (e.g.Non-Code COMMENTS Element of the Probable Probable More Environment Minor Major Information Impacts Impacts Necessary Earth Air Water Plants Land Use Animals Environmental Health Energy/ Natural Resources Element ofthe Probable Probable MoreEnvironmentMinorMajorInformationImpactsImpactsNecessary Housinl Aesthetics Light Recreation Utilities Transportation Public Services Historic Preservation Airport Environment 10,000 Feet 14,000 Feet B.POLICY-RELATED COMMENTS C.CODE-RELATED COMMENTS We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas in which we have expertise and have identified areas ofprobable impact or areas where additionalinformation is needed to properly assess this proposal. Signature of Director or Authorized Representative Date City ••enton Department of Planning /Building /P Works ENVIRONMENTAL &DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET REVIEWING DEPARTMENT:COMMENTS DUE:MARCH 22,2006 APPLICATION NO:LUA05-161,SA-H,SA-M,ECF DATE RECIRCULATED:MARCH 8,2006 APPLICANT:Jim Manion,Lowe's HIW PROJECT TITLE:Lowe's of Renton SITE AREA:9.79 acres LOCATION:800 Garden Avenue N PROJECT MANAGER:Keri Weaver R E C F'I V E D PLAN REVIEW:Jan Illian A 0 BUILDING AREA (gross):128,277 square feet WORK ORDER NO:77528 BUILDING DIVISION SUMMARY OF PROPOSAL:Applicant is requesting master plan and site development plan approval and SEPA review,for a Lowe's Home Improvement retail store totalling 128,277 sq.ft.with a 28,712 sq.ft.garden area and 428 parking spaces.The site is located at 800 Garden Ave.N,at the intersection of Park Ave.N and Garden Ave.N. PLEASE NOTE:Revised Site Plan,additional reports/studies:Geotechinical Study,Environmental Site Assessment & Groundwater Sampling Report &Traffic Impact Analysis A° Element of theEnvironment Earth Air Water Plants Land/Shoreline Use Animals ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT (e.g.Non-Cod Probable ProbableMinorMajorImpactsImpacts Environmental Health Energy/Natural Resources COMMENTS MoreInformaonNecessary Element ofthe Probable Probable MoreEnvironmentMinorMajorInformationImpactsImpactsNecessary Housing Aesthetics Light/Glare Recreation Utilities Transportation Public Services Historic/Culturel Preservation Airport Environment 10,000 Feet 14,000 Feet B.POLICY-RELA TED COMMENTS C.CODE-RELA TED COMMENTS We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas in which we have expertise and have identified areas of probable impact or areas where additional information is needed to properly assess this proposal. Signature of Director or Ay[rizd Rdpresentative Date/ t??"!ii'i, s $ f Project Name: Project Address: Contact Person: Permit Number: 800 r A,xl Project Description: cn,,-s,-,ppu9 ---r'r- Land Use Type: []Residential ;Retail []Non-retail .iCaiculath)n:.": :..-'X ....i.,.....Y:-.....- •..',"".. ,•.'. Method of Calculation: ITE Trip Generation Manual,7t"Edition '-Tra ffic Study []Other J-- •-.....-..'-':..-%--poo..:.•i,.1'..o.,"....:c.s,-.,=.,,>----.','-,•-..:•..,...:.,, -Transportation Mitigation .Fee: Calculated by: Date of.Payment: .:... City,tenton Department ofPlanning /Building /PL :Works ENVIRONMENTAL &DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW REVIEWI NG DEPARTMENT. APPLICATION NO:LUA05-161,SA-H,SA-M,ECF APPLICANT:Jim Manion,Lowe's HIW PROJECT TITLE:Lowe's of Renton SITE AREA:9.79 acres LOCATION:800 Garden Avenue N COMMENTS DUE:MARCH 22,2006 SHEET DATE RECIRCULATED:MARCH 8,2006 PROJECT MANAGER:Keri Weaver RECEIVED PLAN REVIEW:Jan Illian /£'.u .,,,vQVlit'tI, BUILDING AREA (0ross):128,277 square feet WORK ORDER NO:77528 BUILDING DIVISION SUMMARY OF PROPOSAL:Applicant is requesting master plan and site development plan approval and SEPA review,for a Lowe's Home Improvement retail store totalling 128,277 sq.ft.with a 28,712 sq.ft.garden area and 428 parking spaces.The site is located at 800 Garden Ave.N,at the intersection of Park Ave.N and Garden Ave.N. PLEASE NOTE:Revised Site Plan,additional reports/studies:Geotechinical Study,Environmental Site Assessment & Groundwater Sampling Report &Traffic Impact Analysis A° Element of the Environment Earth Air Water Plants ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT (e.g.Non-CodE Probable Probable Minor Major Impacts Impacts Land/Shoreline Use Animals Environmental Health Energy/ Natural Resources COMMENTS More Information Necessary Element of the Probable Probable MoreEnvironmentMinorMajorInformation Impacts Impacts Necessary Housing Aesthetics Light/Glare Recreation Utilities Transportation Public Services Historic.,/Cu/ture/ Preservation Airport Environment 1O,000 Feet 14,000 Feet B.POLICY-RELA TED COMMENTS C.CODE-RELATED COMMENTS We have reviewed this application witharticular attention to those areas in which we have expertise and have identified areas of probable impact or areas where additional informatthis,proposal.=//-- Signature of Director or Auth Representative Date PrOJECT LUA-05-161,SA-H,SA-M,"-CF Lowe's of Renton City of Renton Department of Planning /Building /Public Works ENVIRONMENTAL &DEVELOPMENTAL APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET (Continuation) POLICE RELATED COMMENTS 64 Police Calls for Service Estimated Annually CONSTRUCTION PHASE Theft from construction sites is one of the most commonly reported crimes in the City.To protect materials and equipment it is recommended that all materials and tools be locked up when not in use.The site should have security lighting,and any construction trailer or storage area should be completely fenced-in with portable chain-link fencing.The fence will provide both a physical and psychological barrier to any prospective criminal and will demonstrate that the area is private property.Construction trailers should be kept locked when not in use,and should be fitted with heavy-duty deadbolts with a minimum 1-1/2"throw when bolted.Glass windows in construction trailers should be shatter-resistant.Toolboxes and storage containers should be secured with heavy-duty padlocks and kept locked when not in use. "No Trespassing"signs should be posted on the property during the construction phase. These signs allow officers,upon contact,to provide a verbal warning to trespassers that should they be contacted on the property again,they could be cited and/or arrested. COMPLETED COMPLEX All exterior doors should be made of solid metal or metal over wood,with heavy-duty deadbolt locks,latch guards or pry-resistant cylinders around the locks,and peepholes.If glass doors are used,they should be fitted with the hardware described above and additionally be fitted with a layer of security film.Security film can increase the strength of the glass by up to 300%,greatly reducing the likelihood of breaking glass to gain entry. Access to the back of the buildings should be limited,preferably with security fencing,as these areas could be vulnerable to crime due to the lack of natural surveillance by business customers or tenants. It is recommended areas be monitored with recorded security alarm systems installed.It's not uncommon for businesses to experience theft and/or vandalism during the hours of darkness.An auxiliary security service could be used to patrol the property during those times.It is important to direct all foot traffic into the main entrance of the building.Any alternative employee entrances should have coded access to prevent trespassing. Security Survey Page 1 of 2 05-161 If there are payphones oL -Je the businesses,it is recommer,-J they be outgoing use only. Public payphones tend to attract drug traffic and having only the ability to call out on payphones severely hinders this type of activity. All areas of this project need to have adequate lighting.This will assist in the deterrent of theft from motor vehicle (one of the most common crimes in Renton)as well as provide safe pedestrian travel for customers utilizing the business. The structure should have a building number clearly posted with numbers at least 6"in height and of a color contrasting with the building.This will assist emergency personnel in locating the correct location for response. Landscaping should be installed with the objective of allowing visibility -not too dense and not too high.Too much landscaping will make customers and employees feel isolated and will provide criminals with concealment to commit crimes such as burglary and malicious mischief (property destruction). It is key for safety and security reasons to have appropriate lighting and signage."No Trespassing"signs should be posted in conspicuous locations throughout the property, including entrances to the property and parking areas. I highly recommend that the developer have a Renton Police Crime Prevention Representative conduct a security survey of the premises once construction is complete. Security Survey Page 2 of 2 05-161 City zenton Department of Planning /Building /PL ,Works ENVIRONMENTAL &DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET REVIEWING DEPARTMENT:',. APPLICATION NO:LUA05-161,SA-H,SA-M,ECF APPLICANT:Jim Manion,Lowe's HIW PROJECT TITLE:Lowe's of Renton SITE AREA:9.79 acres LOCATION:800 Garden Avenue N COMMENTS DUE:MAR PLAN REVIEW:Jan Illian ---O " BUILDING AREA (gross):128,277 square feet WORK ORDER NO:77528 SUMMARY OF PROPOSAL:Applicant is requesting master plan and site development plan approval and SEPA review,for a Lowe's Home Improvement retail store totalling 128,277 sq.ft.with a 28,712 sq.ft.garden area and 428 parking spaces.The site is located at 800 Garden Ave.N,at the intersection of Park Ave.N and Garden Ave.N. PLEASE NOTE:Revised Site Plan,additional reports/studies:Geotechinical Study,Environmental Site Assessment & Groundwater Sampling Report &Traffic Impact Analysis A.ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT (e.g.Non-Code Element of theEnvironment Earth Air Water Plants Land/Shoreline Use Animals Environmental Health Energy/Natural Resources ProbableMinorImpacts ProbableMajorImpacts COMMENTS MoreInformationNecessary Element of the Probable Probable MoreEnvironmentMinorMajorInformationImpactsImpactsNecessary Housing Aesthetics Light/G/are Recreation Utilities Transportation Public Services Historic/Cultural Preservation Airport Environment10,000 Feet 14,000 Feet B.POLIC Y-RELA TED COMMENTS C.CODE-RELA TED COMMENTS We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas in which we have expertise and have identified areas of probable impact or areas whereitalinfo!isneededtoproperlyassessthisproposal. Signature of D--ect orAu orized Representative Jate "J -O cit ENVIRONMENTAL & REVIEWING DEPARTMENT:¢P)li( APPLICATION NO:LUA05-161,SA-H,SA-M,ECF DATE CIRCULATED:JANUARY 9,2006 APPLICANT:Jim Manion,Lowe's HIW PROJECT MANAGER:Keri Weaver PROJECT TITLE:Lowe's of Renton PLAN REVIEW:Jan Illian SITE AREA:9.79 acres LOCATION:800 Garden Avenue N ,Yenton Department of Planning /Building /J c Works DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW COMMENTS DUE:JANUARY 23,2006 BUILDING AREA (gross):128,277 square feet WORK ORDER NO:77528 SHEET SUMMARY OF PROPOSAL:Applicant is requesting master plan and site development plan approval and SEPA review,for a Lowe's Home Improvement retail store totalling 128,277 sq.ft.with a 28,712 sq.ft.garden area and 428 parking spaces.The site is located at 800 Garden Ave.N,at the intersection of Park Ave.N and Garden Ave.N. A.ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT (e.g.Non-Code)COMMENTS Element ofthe Probable Probable MoreEnvironmentMinorMajorInformation Impacts Impacts Necessary Earth Air Water Plants Land/Shoreline Use Animals EnvironmentalHealth Energy/ Natural Resources Element of the Probable Probable MoreEnvironmentMinorMajorInformation Impacts Impacts Necessary Housin Aesthetics Light/Glare Recreation Utilities Transportation Public Services Historic/Cultural Preservation Airport Environment 10,000 Feet 14,000 Feet B.POLICY-RELATED COMMENTS C.CODE-RELATED COMMENTS We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas in which we have expertise and have identified areas of probable impact or areas where additional information is needed to properly assess this proposal. Signature of Director or Authorized Representative Date City ..,¢enton Department of Planning /Building /PL ,Works ENVIRONMENTAL &DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET REVIEWING DEPARTMENT:C)t'%'.L[..' APPLICATION NO:LUA05-161,SA-H,SA-M,ECF APPLICANT:Jim Manion,Lowe's HIW PROJECT TITLE:Lowe's of Renton SITE AREA:9.79 acres LOCATION:800 Garden Avenue N COMMENTS DUE:MARCH 22,2006 DATE RECIRCULATED:MARCH 8,2006 c PROJECT MANAGER:Keri Weaver 'R E'C'E"i'V"E D PLAN REVIEW:Jan Illian A.a.'l n o ,nnUVlMI,U U LUUU BUILDING AREA (gross):128,277 square f.e.et......r,,hnlNkl WORK ORDER NO:77528 uuIl"Dl'ri-5/'VISION SUMMARY OF PROPOSAL:Applicant is requesting master plan and site development plan approval and SEPA review,for aLowe's Home Improvement retail store totalling 128,277 sq.ft.with a 28,712 sq.ft.garden area and 428 parking spaces.The site islocatedat800GardenAve.N,at the intersection of Park Ave.N and Garden Ave.N. PLEASE NOTE:Revised Site Plan,additional reports/studies:Geotechinical Study,Environmental Site Assessment & Groundwater Sampling Report &Traffic Impact Analysis A.ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT (e.g.Non-Code)COMMENTS Element ofthe Probable Probable MoreEnvironmentMinorMajorInformationImpactsImpactsNecessary Earth Air Water Plants Land/Shoreline Use Animals Environmental Health Energy/Natural Resources Element of the Probable Probable MoreEnvironmentMinorMajorInformationImpactsImpactsNecessary Housin Aesthetics Light/Glare Recreation Utilities Transportation Public Services Historic/Cultural Preservation Airport Environment 10,000 Feet 14,000 Feet B.POLICY-RELA TED COMMENTS C.CODE-RELA TED COMMENTS We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas in which we have expertise and have identified areas of probable impact or areas where additional information is needed to properly assess thisproposal. Signature of Director or Authorized Representative Date City of Renon Department ofPlanning /Building /Pubfic Works ENVIRONMENTAL &DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEWING DEPARTMENT:/2 APPLICATION NO:LUA05-161,SA-H,SA-M,ECF REVIEW COMMENTS DUE:MARCH 22,2006 DATE RECIRCULATED:MARCH 8,2006 APPLICANT:Jim Manion,Lowe's HIW PROJECT MANAGER:Keri Weaver PROJECT TITLE:Lowe's of Renton PLAN REVIEW:Jan Illian SITE AREA:9.79 acres LOCATION:800 Garden Avenue N BUILDING AREA (gross):128,277 square feet WORK ORDER NO:77528 SHEET SUMMARY OF PROPOSAL:Applicant is requesting master plan and site development plan approval and SEPA review,for a Lowe's Home Improvement retail store totalling 128,277 sq.ft.with a 28,712 sq.ft.garden area and 428 parking spaces.The site is located at 800 Garden Ave.N,at the intersection of Park Ave.N and Garden Ave.N. PLEASE NOTE:Revised Site Plan,additional reports/studies:Geotechinical Study,Environmental Site Assessment & Groundwater Sampling Report &Traffic Impact Analysis A. Element of theEnvironment Earth Air Water ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT (e.g.Non-Code Probable ProbableMinorMajorImpactsImpacts Plants Land/Shoreline Use Animals Environmental Health Energy/ Natural Resources COMMENTS MoreInformationNecessary Element ofthe Probable Probable MoreEnvironmentMinorMajorInformationImpactsImpactsNecessary Housin£t Aesthetics Litht/Glare Recreation Utilities Transportation Pubfic Services Historic/Cultural Preservation Airport Environment 10,000 Feet 14,000 Feet B°POLICyoRELA TED COMMENTS C.CODE-RELA TED COMMENTS We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas in which we have expertise and have identified areas of probable impact or areas where additional information is needed to properly assess this proposal. "l'J Date "S igo;'ized Representative /i/7"--"/ l,'J M E FIRE DEPARTMENT M O R A N D U M DATE: TO: FROM: SUBJECT: March 9,2006 Keri Weaver,Senior Planner JLmwe:,sGYR eAi is;asn0F iGrMar shale.Y MITIGATION ITEMS: 1.A fire mitigation fee of $75,420.80 is required based on $.52 per square foot of the building square footage. FIRE CODE REQUIREMENTS: 1.The preliminary fire flow is 6500 GPM,one hydrant is required with 150 feet of the structure and 6 additional hydrants are required within 300 feet of the structure.Add one hydrant at the midpoint of the fire lane on the East side of the building. 2.Separate plans and permits are required for the installation of fire alarm and sprinkler systems. 3.Provide a list of any flammable,combustible liquids or hazardous chemical that may be used or stored on site. Please feel free to contact me if you have any questions. i:\loweserc.doc City Renton Department of Planning /Building /F,"Works ENVIRONMENTAL &DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET REVIEWING DEPARTMENT:-i'lt-€.COMMENTS DUE:MARCH 22_.2_,.2.0_06 jji i'',IAPPLICANT:Jim Manion,Lowe's HIW PROJECT MANAGER:gNrj aver ]1,!il'!/!1 'PROJECT TITLE:Lowe's of Renton PLAN REVIEW:Jan Illialnl MAR ='8 20 li SITE AREA:9.79 acres BUILDING AREA (9ross)1128,277 square feet _I ,^,n=k"npn=p Nn.77,L__CITY OF RENT0*!1LOCATION:800 Garden Avenue N .................f-........r:,*p-z4;--,T ! SUMMARY OF PROPOSAL:Applicant is requesting master plan and site development pl"a-rr-approval and SEPA revLew,for a Lowe's Home Improvement retail store totalling 128,277 sq.ft.with a 28,712 sq.ft.garden area and 428 parking spaces.The site is located at 800 Garden Ave.N.at the intersection of Park Ave.N and Garden Ave.N. PLEASE NOTE:Revised Site Plan,additional reports/studies:Geotechinical Study,Environmental Site Assessment & Groundwater Sampling Report &Traffic Impact Analysis A.ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT (e.g.Non-Code)COMMENTS Element of the Probable Probable MoreEnvironmentMinorMajorInformationImpactsImpactsNecessary Earth Air Water Plants Land/Shoreline Use Animals Environmental Health Energy/ Natural Resources Element of the MoreEnvironmentInformationNecessary Probable ProbableMinorMajorImpactsImpacts x2 Housing Aesthetics Light/Glare Recreation Utilities Transportation Public Services Historic/Cultural Preservation Airport Environment 10,000 Feet 14,000 Feet B.POLICY-RELA TED COMMENTS C.CODE-RELATED COMMENTS We have,viewed this aplction with particular attention to those areas in which we have expertise and have identified areas of probable impact or area/ks whle additional inf/k)n is needed to property assess this proposal.=/C /t//) Sigae of Directoror "Au-'Orlfe Representative Date 11235SE 6TH STREET surn 220 BELLEVUE,WA 98004 T 425.453.9501 F 425.453.8208 WWW.PACND,COM LETTER OF TRANSMITTAL N@Date:March 8,2006 To:Keri Weaver,City of Renton From:Miyoung Tran for Steven Pesce Re:LOWE'S of Renton;Renton,Washington Geotechnical Report and Phase I ESA Remarks: As you requested,please find enclosed five (5)copies of the Geotechnical report dated January 26,2006 and four (4)copies of the Phase I Environmental Site Assessment and Groundwater Sampling report dated March 6,2006 for the above referenced project.There is a summary of recommendations included at the beginning of each report. Please let me know if you have any questions. Thank you. 2005127.014.00-16/rnlokwtr04.doc mmt 11235SE 6TH STREET SUITE 220 BELLEVUE,WA 98004 T 425.453.9501 F 425.453.8208 WWW.PACND.COM LETTER OF TRANSMITTAL Date: To: February 18,2006 Keri Weaver,City of Renton From:Steven Pesce Re:LOWES of Renton;Renton,Washington FEB 2 2 2006 Remarks: Please find enclosed the one (1)copy of the geotechnical report dated January 26,2006 for the above referenced project.There is a summary of recommendations included at the beginning of each report. Please let me know if you have any questions. SUMMARY OF RECOMMENDATIONS -LOWE'S OF RENTON,WASHINGTON Item I Conclusions and Recommendations I Rep.Sec. Project Subsurface Conditions Site Soils FILL consisting of medium dense to dense silty sand with gravel to depths of 5 to 13 feet; UPPER ALLUVIAL DEPOSITS consisting of loose to medium dense sand and soft to 3.3,Figures 3-4mediumstiffsilt,clay,organic silt and peat to depths of 46 to 62 feet;LOWER ALLUVIAL DEPOSITS consisting of medium dense to very dense sand and gravel. Groundwater Groundwater measured at 6 to 8'½feet below ground surface in monitoring wells.3.4 Soil Corrosivity Low potential in FILL.Moderate to high potential in UPPER ALLUVIAL DEPOSITS.4.11.2 Seismic Design Liquefaction High potential for liquefaction:2 to 12 inches of settlement.4.2.2 Lateral Spreading Moderate to high potential for lateral spreading:up to 2 inches.4.2.3 IBC Parameters Site Class E (Fa=0.9,Fv=2.4)for pile foundations or Site Class D (Fa=1.0,Fv=1.5)for 4.2.4groundimprovement.Ss=1.45g,$1=0.49g.See Tables 2 and 3 in report. Consolidation Consolidation Settlement I Primary settlement of 2 to 4 inches.Secondary settlement of 1 to 3 inches.I 4.3 Foundation Support Options Pile Foundations Augercast piles (14-inch or 18-inch)or driven steel pipe piles (14-inch)embedded at least 10 4.4.1,4.4.2feetintotheLOWERALLUVIALDEPOSITS. Vertical Pile Capacity Downward capacity of 60 to 120 kips and uplift capacity of 35 to 65 kips,depending on pile 4.4.2.2,Figure 5 diameter and embedment depth.See Table 4 in report. Lateral Pile Capacity Lateral capacity of 15 to 26 kips (no lateral spreading included)or 1.5 to 5 kips (lateral spreading included),depending on pile diameter.Inclusion of lateral spreading is not a life 4.4.2.3 safety issue but a performance based design decision.See Tables 5 and 6 in report. Lateral Resistance Allowable passive resistance of 300 pcf.No friction allowed.4.4.2.3 Shallow Foundations with Ground improvement (stone columns or rammed aggregate piers)to allow transfer of building Ground Improvement loads to soils at depth.Ground improvement should extend at least 50 feet below the ground 4.4.1,4.4.3 surface.Design is performance based and best left to qualified contractor. Typical Layout 30 inch diameter stone columns spaced on 8 to 9 foot centers.4.4.3 Typical Bearing Allowable bearing of 3,000 to 4,000 psf can typically be achieved.4.4.3 Recommended Option Augercast piles.4.4.1,4.4.2.1 Concrete Floor Slabs and Hardscape Store Hardscape (entry slabs and sidewalks) Supported using augercast piles or ground improvement.Minimum 4-inch capillary break material below slabs. Supported on 4-inch compacted CRBC over compacted subgrade.Special requirements to limit differential settlement near building. Retaining Walls Active Equivalent fluid pressure of 35 pcf.4.7 At-Rest Equivalent fluid pressure of 50 pcf.4.7 Earthwork and Grading Subgrade Preparation Building Pad Pavements Hardscape Structural Fill/Compaction Utilities Leave existing asphalt in-place,where feasible,to facilitate construction.Proofroll (compact) subgrade prior to placement of new structural fill. No special requirements for slab subgrade if building/slab supported on pile foundations, other than to support construction equipment.If building is supported on improved ground,a 2-foot-thick layer of crushed rock is required to transfer loads.Grind or remove asphalt to facilitate pile or ground improvement installation. Grind or break up asphalt and mix in with existing subgrade soils or remove asphalt. Compact subgrade prior to pavement installation. Same as pavements. See material specifications and compaction standards in report. Temporary slopes no steeper than 11½H:1V.Trench boxes should be used where needed. Utilities that tie into the building should have flexible connections. 4.8.2 4.4.3,4.5,4.8.2 4.8.2,4.9 4.8.2 4.8.4 4.6,4.8.6 Asphalt Concrete Pavements Standard Duty 3 inches HMA over 6 inches CRBC.4.9,4.9.3 Heady Duty 3 inches HMA over 8 inches CRBC.4.9,4.9.3 Portland Cement Concrete Products Standard Duty 5 inches PCC over 4 inches CRBC.4.9,4.9.4 Heavy Duty 6 inches PCC over 4 inches CRBC.4.9,4.9.4 File No.8335-003-00 GEoENGINEERSJ January 26,2006 O9 >- CT,OE < Z 4Z X 0 c-I DLI ZddK3CO LAKE ASHINGTON t ;,AIRP b 4 . Reproduced with permission granted by THOMAS BROS.MAPS. This map is copyrighted by THOMAS BROS.MAPS.It is unlawful to copy or reproduce all or any part thereof,whether for personal use or resale,without permission. TItTlq 21;.?J ........ 2000 I N s0 2OOO I Feet Vicinity Map Lowe's of Renton Site Renton,Washington GEOENGINEERS i"I Figure I 81'I!'F-&TT: _£:.:NIL.. N NN NN # i / 00 0 00 L,t.I m t' .$.,.m <1) 0I-t-0 0 r" {X')13. o -b : c,J S3,L :@6ot-ul V/N:Ja-IX 90/-/[(]3N:S@S aJn6]:aLuoN qol no/[o7 6P'g 4 puo:40000c_;££'£\(]VO \O0 \E'OOgE'E'g \:el\bl@3a 7 II rm .<orY7j 0d (J_33 -I)NOIIVA3q3 bO<0 0 0 0 "l-k- 0O9 "'-S d (N ,0l J_3S-I-IO)I.-13 I I I I u?u3 o-. o-. o-. d C', 0-- WO'3 0I (3S ,06 .LqS_-L:IO)-£dO< z0 zLdrf b_CDaozz (/I -Lu oxrY o.J LJO90 0E12 13_ O9 6O (MN ,gl.!.lqS_.4JO)-.I.dO co 0I -,, 0 0 -0 0 0 00oqr'O ',q'-u'9 cO0IIIIII I I I I I I I I O3 0-V)I I II C'-' 0-" tEza <<t Jc,.D ]z -uon or)or)I I I I I--C" CO r.n "cO tnIII 0" C-' O' O' I °°1 J nO EL o o enOCh 3IIII 109 o_o0-10_D,,,n 0_09 J 0_o usI I Ib go £L -.d >p_J__0-",.60o0_ c-.0/" O"£S.4 Of) (/3 U?I 0-./ 0-. U'?I Im c/b EL 0-.09II Ca ca ca 0_ca i 1 i0_1 ca ca(S ,0!.13SA-tO)-B I I Ii I I I I I Ii I ,I / c'-. o-.I ,5 o 6,,5 ,5 ,5 6 6 I-.o9Ld z'6 0£Oz Lo ,@ cq cN i,oIII (J.33 -I)NOIIVA393 C8In I I 4) I ,5 I o--oco o-o iocoI × "-0 '-S OOus -," --IJJ :I:".0 on/ o-o.,q- LLL _gb or c-oh1:3> I_> Q_...-,•--C ¢--'5 .o ®oOOc_) °d z o ,-,o -PS o '6 6 (S ,0[J_3S_t_0)I.-B n I 0-, 0-. o-oo,I o-o -0 V/N :o6OWl V/N :JaJx 90/;/I.aaN:sas (2 aJn6!4:aWeN qo/].noAo9 6P£'2,00£'oog£'£9\QVO \O0 \£oog££g \:d\Flasa I REDM \P:\8,3,3500,3\O0 \CAD \83,3500,300F4.dwg Layout Tab Name:Figure 4 SDS:NED 1/25/06 Xref:N/A Image:N/A m .-3 I I ,B-1 (OFFSET 10'S) I u3 0 c0 u3 "-"0 .....''q c n S- o o r -' 0 (0 d o.1210 I--v <r3 <C3 o m0mz ,==o ___o r--r- --"--I rrl m x qq "11 !- (1) c4o-o 4o-o cn0-0 $_o ELEVATION (FEET) I I I I I Ioc4Ix000000 0 oIfIIIII I .© qD Ir / / / / I Pfl .-0 F'---3°/m;:o'.4© .-3 I Ibq0 O3c-- o o oIII z0ol:;13 ;;13o-4 > > ----t 09 CO .© ,,t'I 'o''o/ -q v--q r- V-,.3 -B-4(OFFSET 130'NW) I CPT-1 (OFFSET 10'E) "0 .© .© I I I r I0Lf)O0 0 /) q u0 q:2 "-)Of) mcqDr-'0o-r.f]I-q-3>:;o(./31-- .-0 .© .-3 -r1 ...) ,0 1/""'''I'ooo o\.o..\<--.<.rIP 2F--F--F--'--I " .© .0 C)m oc---tzzdb 0qD0o9FqCPT-2 (OFFSET 100'NW) 0 m 0-q 0 z 0z m 0 171 .o .© .© .o .0 "©IIIIII ale0 I-) i i i i i i i i I I I I I I o :3 r.oobcn4(..4 I,,3 0000000 ELEVATION (FEET) CPT-3 (OFFSET 80'SE) CPT-5 (OFFSET ,30'E) t o o o'30c--t,I]0 -T" o mbo-4 m Ez I ! S3A:a6ol g V/N:J.aJX I go/ss/t aSN:sas g aJn6!_q:awoN qoj.;noLo-] i 00 0 o0 0 " ° ._=>b3o I--L " UI "-- IJ_,--:.,, JILl 0-"IJJO0Z ._o Z>ILl ,0 Q.I,LI d.o o- T..m o > r-@ o r-O0 " k--LLI r-0"_ :,0 °.2-£S g ,',m 'o ,<,,< 0.° i T i, r o ' °I c E ._=_ °._. .---o =. •'., - 0 "-- e .e c ."5}" _,, g..x o 1 ='- l =€Zl #e,i w 5p-gjpuoz_OO'OOgC2g \avo\oo \coog \:d\asa ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT, NEIGHBORHOODS,AND STRATEGIC PLANNING DEPARTMENT MEMORANDUM DATE: TO: FROM: SUBJECT: January 26,2006 Keri Weavel:,,Development Services Rebecca Lind,Principal Planner Lowe's of Renton Urban Design Regulations Review We have completed our review of the Lowe's of Renton site plan submitted as a requirement of LUA05-161,SA-H,SA-M,ECF. The following are areas of Lowe's of Renton site or building design wherein the intent of the Urban Design Regulations [RMC 4-3-100]have apparently not been met by the plan as submitted. .The Building entry is not connected to the public sidewalk that abuts Garden Avenue N.The landscaping is continuous from the southwest comer of the site with no break for a pedestrian connection [Minimum standard of RMC 4-3- 100.E.3.b.ii].A primary intent of the Design Regulations is to provide clear connections between businesses and public walkways [Minimum standard of RMC 4-3-100.E.3.b.v]and although there is currently no development on the west side of Garden,there has been a residential project proposed for that site. The Lowe's project is a defacto part of the larger plan for the area and must take into account the forthcoming uses adjacent to the site. .The plans do not show a pedestrian walkway system,including a marked crosswalk that connects the building and parking lot with the adjacent property (Fry's Electronics)[Minimum standard of RMC 4-3-100.G.2.a.ii]. .A minimum standard [RMC 4-3-100.G.1 .a.ii]requires parking lot sidewalks perpendicular to the building fagade,spaced no more than 150 feet apart.There is only one such sidewalk shown on the plan.Also,it is unclear how this walkway will function for pedestrians in conjunction with the staggered spacing of trees shown. .There is insufficient articulation and variation of the fagade on the west and south sides of the building,which are more exposed to public view than the north and east sides.The mass of the building is not sufficiently visually manipulated to be h:\ednsp\interdepartmental\design review\2006\lowe's ofrenton.doc Lowe's Urban Center Design Regulations Review Page 2 of 2 January 26,2006 compatible with the overall scale of the adjacent development,as currently allowed and proposed [Minimum standard for RMC 4-3-100.I.1 .c.i and ii]. Lowe's articulatedfafade (Mill Creek Washington) Examples of fagade articulation and modulation that visually reduce the scale of the building. . , The roof color does not appear to be specified on the plan sheets ("single-ply membrane roofing...ref specs").Roof-mounted equipment and roof material and color are to be coordinated so as to reduce the visual impact when viewed from above [Minimum standards of RMC 4-3-100.I.3.a].The proposed project on the west side of Garden is a seven-story residential building that will view the Lowe's roof from above.A dark color is preferred so as to reduce reflected light and glare. Chain link fencing (specified on plan sheet A-1.0,notes 2.01 and 2.02)is prohibited [Minimum standard of RMC 4-3-100.E.5.a.iv]. CiK Re,..on Department of Planning/Building/tic t,,.,,ks ENVIRONMENTAL &DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET REV,EW,NGOEPARTMENT:APPLICATION NO:LUA05-161,SA-H,SA-M,ECF COMMENTS DUE:JANUARY 23,2006 DATE CIRCULATED:JANUARY 9,2006 RECEIVED APPLICANT:Jim Manion,Lowe's HIW PROJECT MANAGER:Keri Weaver ..i'n'v ;i06 PROJECT TITLE:Lowe's of Renton PLAN REVIEW:Jan Illian SITE AREA:9.79 acres LOCATION:800 Garden Avenue N BUILDING AREA (gross):128,277 square fe#UILDING DIVISION WORK ORDER NO:77528 SUMMARY OF PROPOSAL:Applicant is requesting master plan and site development plan approval and SEPA review,for a Lowe's Home Improvement retail store totalling 128,277 sq.ft.with a 28,712 sq.ft.garden area and 428 parking spaces.The site is located at 800 Garden Ave.N,at the intersection of Park Ave.N and Garden Ave.N. A.ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT (e.g.Non-Code Element oftheEnvironment Eadh Air Water Plants Land/Shoreline Use Animals Environmental Health Energy/Natural Resources ProbableMinorImpacts ProbableMajorImpacts COMMENTS MoreInformationNecessary Element of theEnvironment Housing Aesthetics Light/Glare Recreation Utilities Transportation Pubfic Services Historic/CulturalPreservation Airpod Environment 10,000 Feet 14,000 Feet ProbableMinorImpacts ProbableMajorImpacts MoreInformaonNecessary B.POLICY-RELATED COMMENTS C° We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas in which we have expertise and have identified areas of probable impact or areas where additional information is needed to properly a_ssess this proposal. Signature of Director or Authorized Representative Date 39015 172nd Avenue S.E.o Auburn,Washington 98092-9763 Phone:(253)939-3311 o FAX:(253)8-/6-3312 January23,2006 Keri Weaver Senior Planner,Development Services Division 1055 South Grady Way Renton,WA 98055 O ELO EN.r FEB.-s ZOO6 Dear Ms.Weaver: RE:Lowe's ofRenton Project,Land Use #LUA05-161,SA-H,SA-M,ECF On behalf ofthe Cultural Resources Committee,I have reviewed the information sent on January 9,2006 regarding the proposed Lowe's ofRenton Project and have the following comments.The project property is an area the Tribe has flagged as high potential for archaeological discovery.Past archaeological finds in the area have demonstrated the possibility of cultural resources being present, even in areas that are considered developed or previously disturbed.We believe that the project should be assessed by a professional archaeologist for its potential to yield significant cultural resources,prior to construction. Due to the project's ground disturbing activities and the potential for archaeological discovery, the Cultural Committee is requesting: 1.An archaeological field survey of the project APE by a professional archaeologist 2.The option of sending a tribal monitor during the field survey The Cultural Resources Program does not represent the Wildlife Program and the Fisheries Program which are separate departments under the Muckleshoot Indian Tribe.Please contact these departments for their input on this project. We appreciate the effort to coordinate with the Muckleshoot Tribe prior to site preparation.The destructive nature of construction excavation can often destroy a site and cause delays and unnecessary expense for the contractor.Ifyou have any questions,please contact me at 253-876-3272.Thank you for keeping the Tribe informed. Sin}?ly, Laura R.Murphy ' Cc:Stephenie Kramer,Assistant State Archaeologist CITY OF RENTON MEMORANDUM DATE: TO: FROM: SUBJECT: January 24,2006 Keri Weaver Jan Illian x7216 LOWES HARDWARE 800 -Garden Ave North LUA 05-161 I have reviewed the application for Lowes Hardware to be located at 800 -Garden Ave North and have the following comments: EXISTING CONDITIONS WATER There is an existing 12-inch water main in Garden Ave North.Pressure in the vicinity is approximately 125 psi.A pressure-reducing valve will be required.The proposed project is located in the 320 Pressure Zone and is not inside an Aquifer Protection Zone.Derated fire flow available in the vicinity is 4,000 gpm. SEWER There is an existing 8-inch sewer main in Garden Ave North. STORM There are existing storm facilities in Garden Ave North. STREETS There is no sidewalk,curb,and gutter fronting the property in Garden Ave North. CODE REQUIREMENTS WATER 1.A Water System Development Charge (SDC)of $2,582.31 is owed on this site.The rate is based on 9,459 square feet x $0.273.This is payable at the time the utility permit is issued. 2.A water main extension is required.Applicant has shown a looped 12-inch main around the building. 3.Preliminary fire flow determined by the fire department is 7,250 gpm.Applicant will need to reduce fire flow demand to meet the 4,000 gpm available to serve this site.One hydrant must be within 150 feet from the structure and additional hydrants will be required within 300 feet of the structure.Applicant has shown hydrants to be installed along the new water main. 4.A fire sprinkler system is required by the fire department.A separate utility permit and separate plans will be required for the installation of all double detector check valve assemblies for fire sprinkler systems.All devices installed shall be per the latest Department of Health "Approved List"of Backflow Prevention Devices.Location of device shall be shown on the civil plans and shall show note:"Separate plans and utility permit for DDCVA installation for Fire Sprinkler System will be required".DDCVA installations outside the building shall be in accordance with the City of Renton Standards. For DDCVA installations proposed to be installed inside the building,applicant shall submit a copy of the mechanical plan showing the location and installation of the backflow assembly inside the mechanical room. Installation shall be in accordance with the City of Renton's requirements.DDCVA shall be installed . . immediately after the pipe has p "d through the building floor slab.Instal'n of devices shall be in the horizontal position only.A separaL,utility permit and separate plans will be re,,,red for the installation of the double detector check valve assembly for the fire sprinkler system,if backflow device is to be installed inside the building. If the building exceeds 30 feet in height,a backflow device will be required to be installed on the domestic water meter.A pressure-reducing valve will be required on the domestic water meter. Landscape irrigation systems will require a separate permit for the irrigation meter and approved backflow device is required to be installed.A plumbing permit will be required. SANITARY SEWER 1 A Sewer System Development Charge (SDC)of $1,343.18 is owed on this site.The rate is based on 9,459 square feet x $0.142.This is payable at the time the utility permit is issued. 2.If food preparation facilities are proposed,a grease trap or grease interceptor will be required.A separate plumbing permit will be required for installations inside the building. 3.A sewer main extension is not required. SURFACE WATER 1.No Surface Water System Development Charges are owed on this site. 2.There is an existing 48"storm pipe system in Garden Ave N. 3.Applicant has submitted a drainage report and drainage plans for review.Preliminary review shows that applicant has addressed the general requirements per the 1990 KCSWM,however revisions to the report will be required at civil plan submittal. STREET IMPROVEMENTS 1.Half street improvements including city standard 5-foot sidewalks,curb cuts,curb,gutter,paving,storm drainage and streetlights are required to be installed in Garden Ave N. 2.All wire utilities shall be installed underground per the City of Renton Undergrounding Ordinance.If three or more poles are required to be moved by the development design,all existing overhead utilities shall be placed underground. 3.The driveway entrance needs to be located so it is in alignment with the new 10 Street. GENERAL COMMENTS 1.All construction utility permits for utilities,drainage and street improvements will require separate plan submittals.All utility plans shall conform to the Renton Drafting Standards.Plans shall be prepared by a licensed Civil Engineer. 2.When the utility plans are complete,please submit three (3)copies of the drawings,two (2)copies of the drainage report;permit application and an itemized cost of construction estimate and application fee at the counter on the sixth floor.A fee worksheet is attached for your use,but prior to preparing a check,it is recommended to call 425-430-7266 for a fee estimate as generated by the permit system The fee for review and inspection of these improvements is 5%of the first $100,000 of the estimated construction costs;4%of anything over $100,000 but less than $200,000,and 3%of anything over $200,000. Halfthe fee must be paid upon application. MISCELLANEOUS 1.Separate permits for side sewer,domestic water meter,landscape irrigation meter and any backflow devices will be required. 2.Applicant shall be responsible for securing all necessary easements for utilities. 3.All new rockeries or retaining walls to be constructed that are greater than 4 feet in height will be require a separate building permit.Proper drainage measures are required. .All wire utilities shall be installed underground per the City of Renton Under Grounding Ordinance.If three or more poles are required to be moved by the development design,all existing overhead utilities shall be placed underground. RECOMMENDED CONDITIONS 1.The traffic mitigation fees will be assessed at $285,375.00.See attached Mitigation Fee Report 2.Staff recommends a SEPA condition requiring this project to design and comply with Department of Ecology's Erosion and Sediment Control Requirements,outlined in Volume II of the 2001 Stormwater Management Manual. CC:Kayren Kittrick City of Re....n Department of Planning/Building /Public t,,_.,s ENVIRONMENTAL &DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET APPLICATION NO:LUA05-161,SA-H,SA-M,ECF COMMENTS DUE:JANUARY 23,2006 DATE CIRCULATED:JANUARY 9,2006 c,v oFi:o: APPLICANT:Jim Manion,Lowe's HIW PROJECT MANAGER:Ked Weaver R E CE V E D PROJECT TITLE:Lowe's of Renton PLAN REVIEW:Jan Illian JAN !:0 SITE AREA:9.79 acres BUILDING AREA (gross):128,277 square feet LOCATION:800 Garden Avenue N WORK ORDER NO:77528 BUILDING DIVII, SUMMARY OF PROPOSAL:Applicant is requesting master plan and site development plan approval and SEPA review,for aLowe's Home Improvement retail store totalling 128,277 sq.ft.with a 28,712 sq.ft.garden area and 428 parking spaces.The site islocatedat800GardenAve.N,at the intersection of Park Ave.N and Garden Ave.N. A.ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT (e.g.Non-Code Element of theEnvironment Earth Air Water Plants Land/Shoreline Use Animals Environmental Health Energy/ NaturalResources ProbableMinorImpacts ProbableMajorImpacts COMMENTS More InformationNecessary Element of the Probable Probable MoreEnvironmentMinorMajorInformationImpactsImpactsNecessary Housin Aesthetics LihVGlare Recreation Utilities Transportation Public Services Historic Preservation Airport Environment10,000 Feet14,000 Feet B.POLICY-RELATED COMMENTS C.CODE-RELATED COMMENTS We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas in which we have expertise and have identified areas of probable impact orareaswhereadditionalinformationisneededtoproperlyassessthisproposal. Signature of Director ortlrized'lelrentati --Date J /T Project Name: Project Address: Contact Person: Permit Number: Project Description: I t j ,-1-7 t Land Use Type: []Residential Reta il 81"[Non-retail •:•,"'7. iCalculation: ........Y .,. .•./" '.. Transportation Mitigation Fee: Calculated by:,....-,. •Date of Payment: -•• Method of Calculation: []ITE Trip Generation Manual,7th Edition ,€Traffic Study f []Other --.)-T'L.I,€oC,/It.)(., ,.;...' .5" I •....t " h ;"{ City ofRe,._.,n Department of Planning/Building /Public ....Ks ENVIRONMENTAL &DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET REVIEWING DEPARTMENT:'y"'," APPLICATION NO:LUA05-161,SA-H,SA-M,ECF APPLICANT:Jim Manion,Lowe's HIW PROJECT TITLE:Lowe's of Renton SITE AREA:9.79 acres LOCATION:800 Garden Avenue N COMMENTS DUE:JANUARY 23,2006 DATE CIRCULATED:JANUARY 9,2006 PROJECT MANAGER:Keri Weaver PLAN REVIEW:Jan Illian (1 I'Y O1:HI;.it t k.,'l,RECFIVED • BUILDING AREA (gross):128,277 square fILDING DIVI,..hlON WORK ORDER NO:77528 SUMMARY OF PROPOSAL:Applicant is requesting master plan and site development plan approval and SEPA review,for a Lowe's Home Improvement retail store totalling 128,277 sq.ft.with a 28,712 sq.ft.garden area and 428 parking spaces.The site is located at 800 Garden Ave.N,at the intersection of Park Ave.N and Garden Ave.N. A.ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT (e.g.Non-Code Element ofthe Environment Eaffh A Water Plants Land/Shoreline Use Animals Environmental Health Energy/ Natural Resources Probable Minor Impacts Probable Major Impacts COMMENTS More Information Necessary Element ofthe Probable Probable MoreEnvironmentMinorMajorInformation Impacts Impacts Necessary Housing Aesthetics Litht/Glare Recreation Utilities Transportation Public Services Historic/Cultural Preservation Airport Environment 10,000 Feet 14,000 Feet B.POLICY-RELATED COMMENTS C.CODE-RELA TED COMMENTS We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas in which we have expertise and have identified areas of probable impact or areas where additional informatiny./__assess this proposal.J "f/Z Signature of Director or Au,red'Representative DateE/ #2006_/L PLAN REVIEW RO TING SLIP []SPECIAL ASSESSMENTS AND CONNECTION FEES APPLIED NEED MORE INFORMATION:[]LEGAL DESCRIPTION ',SPECIAL ASSESSMENTS AND CONNECTION FEES ESTIMATED []SQUARE FOOTAGE []VICINITY MAP []NOT APPROVED FOR APPLICATION OF FEES []FRONT FOOTAGE I-I OTHER[]VESTED []NOT VESTED []This fee review supersedes and cancels fee review #dated '-b -1 []PARENT PID#(subject to change)_SUBJECT PROPERTY PID#/--.--.i/[]King Co.Tax Acct#(new) Triggering mechanisms for the SDC fees will b/based on current City ordinances and determined by the applicable Utility Section.Final fees will be based on rates in effect at time of Building PermiffConstruction Permit application.The following quoted fees do NOT include inspection fees.side sewer permits,r/wpermitfeesorthecostofwatermeters. SPECIAL ASSESSMENT DISTRICTS Latecomer Agreement (pvt)WATER Latecomer Agreement (pvt)WASTEWATER Latecomer Agreement (pvt)OTHER Special Assessment District/WATER Special Assessment District/WASTEWATER Joint Use Agreement (METRO) Local Improvement District DISTRICT NO. PARCEL NO. METHOD OF ASSESSMENT ASSESSMENT UNITS Traffic Benefit Zones $75.00 PER TRIP,CALCULATED BY TRANSPORTATION FUTURE OBLIGATIONS SDC FEE ASSESSMENT ,I,OR FEE SYSTEM DEVELOPMENT CHARGE -WATER []Pd Prev.[]Partially Pd (Ltd Exemption) Single family residential $1,956/unit x //Never Pd Mobile home dwelling unit $1,956/unit in park Apartment,Condo $1,174/unit not in CD or COR zones x Commercial/Industrial,$0.273/sq.ft.of property (not less than $1,956.00)X Boeing,by Special Agreement/Footprint of Bldg plus 15 ft perimeter I00 6PM threshom) SYSTEM DEVELOPMENT CHARGE -WASTEWAT []Pd Prev.[]Partially Pd (Ltd Exemption)Il Never Pd Single family residential dwelling unit $1,017/unit x Mobile home dwelling unit $1,017/unit x Apartment,Condo $610/unit not in CD or COR zones x Commercial/Industrial,$0.142/s .ft.of pro ert (not less than $1,017.00)x,4 q .......... SYSTEM DEVELOPMENT CHARGE -SURFACEWAR []Pd Prev.[]Partially Pd (Ltd Exemption)I]Never Pd Single family residential and mobile home dwelling unit $759/unit x All other properties $0.265/sq ft of new impervious area of property x (not ies than $759.00) Sigatu'e of lview]ng Auth" #OF UNITS/ SQ.FTG. Does NOT Apply *If subject property is within an LID,it is developer's responsibility to check with the Finance Dept.for paid/un-paid status. .z!**If an additional water meter (or hydrant)is being installed for fire protection or an additional water meter is being installed for private landscape irrigation,please advise as above fees may change. S EFFECTIVE:January 8,2006 |_l(J- I City of Re,.,n Department of Planning /Building /Pubfic ,xs ENVIRONMENTAL &DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION APPLICATION NO:LUA05-161,SA-H,SA':M,ECF APPLICANT:Jim Manion,Lowe's HIW PROJECT TITLE:Lowe's of Renton SITE AREA:9.79 acres LOCATION:800 Garden Avenue N REVIEW SHEET COMMENTS DUE:JANUARY 23,200R,n L%-LU V E.JLDATECIRCULATED:JANUARY 9,2006 PROJECT MANAGER:KeriWeaver JAN ]O 2006 PLAN REVIEW:Jan Illian CITY OF R'T'"'....... BUILDING AREA (gross):128,277 square feetUI-ILITY SYSTEMS WORK ORDER NO:77528 SUMMARY OF PROPOSAL:Applicant is requesting master plan and site development plan approval and SEPA review,for a Lowe's Home Improvement retail store totalling 128,277 sq.ft.with a 28,712 sq.ft.garden area and 428 parking spaces.The site is located at 800 Garden Ave.N,at the intersection of Park Ave.N and Garden Ave.N. A.ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT (e.g.Non-Code ,COMMENTS Element ofthe Probable Probable MoreEnvironmentMinorMajorInformationImpactsImpactsNecessary Earth Air Water Plants Land/Shoreline Use Animals Environmental Health Energy/Natural Resources Element ofthe Probable Probable MoreEnvironmentMinorMajorInformationImpactsImpactsNecessary Housing Aesthetics Light/Clara RecreationUtilities Transportation Public Services Historic/Cultural Preservation Airport Environment 10,000 Feet 14,000 Feet B.POLICY-RELATED COMMENTS C.CODE-RELA TED COMMENTS We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas in whic have expertise and have identified areas of probable impact or areas where adcfitional informatioess this proposal.(L /../,/z Signature of Director or Authoriz,ef Representative Date STATE OF WASHINGTON DEPARTMENT OF ARCHAEOLOGY &HISTORIC PRESERVATION 1063 S.Capitol Way,Suite 106 °Olympia,Washington 98501 Mailing address:PO Box 48343 °Olympia,Washington 98504-8343 (360)586-3065 • Janua 20,2006 Ms.Keri Weaver Senior Planner City of Renton 1055 S.Grady Way Renton,WA 98055 .... Fax Number (360)586-3067.Website:www'dahp'wa'g°'V'T"L'/,''NTC/'j JAN 2 s 2006 In future correspondence please refer to: Log:012006-30-KI Property:LUA05-161 SA-H,SA-M Lowes 800 Garden Avenue Renton Re:Archaeology -Survey Requested Dear Ms.Weaver: We have reviewed the materials forwarded to our office for the proposed project referenced above.Historically this area was in the floodplain of the Black and Cedar Rivers,and subjected to seasonal flooding.Both of these rivers supported salmon runs.The complex pattern of the rivers'channel migration and flooding and the high water stands of Lake Washington deposited sands,silts and clays,creating surfaces suitable for seasonal living.Flooded backwater areas created wetland areas which were rich in plant and animal resources gathered by Native peoples.There are several recorded archaeological sites south of the project area on such landforms,some up to eight feet below current ground surface.Based upon its geomorphology, and our knowledge of human use of the Renton area,this area has potential for archaeological resources. Further,the scale of the proposed ground disturbing actions would destroy any archaeological resources that may be present.Identification during construction is not a recommended detection method because inadvertent discoveries oftenresult in costly construction delays and damage to the resource.Therefore,we recommend a professional archaeological survey of the project area be conducted prior to ground disturbing activities.This may have to be done in conjunction with the removal of the asphalt.We also recommend consultation with the concerned tribes cultural committees and staff regarding cultural resource issues. If any federal funds or permits are involved Section 106 of the National Historic Preservation Act,as amended,and its implementing regulations,36CFR800,must be followed.This is a separate process from SEPA and requires formal government-to-government consultation with the affected Tribes and this agency.We would appreciate receiving any correspondence or comments from concerned tribes or other parties concerning cultural resource issues that you receive. PARTMENT OF ARCHAEOLOGY &HISTORIC PRESERVATION Protect lhe Past,,Shape lhe Future i Ms.Keri Weaver Senior Planner City of Renton 1055 S.Grady Way Renton,WA 98055 Page 2 These comments are based on the information available at the time of this review and on behalf of the State Historic Preservation Officer.Should additional information become available,our assessment may be revised.Thank you for the opportunity to comment on this project and we look forward to receiving the survey report.Please note that DAHP has recently developed a set of cultural resource reporting guidelines.The guidelines are available on our website at http://www.oahp.wa.gov/pages/Documents/documents/CRStandards_OO4.pdf.Should you have any questions,please feel free to contact me at (360)586-3083 or Stephenie.Kramer@dahp.wa.gov. St,pheni Kramer A'sistant State Archaeologist (360)586-3083 Stephenie.Kramer,dahp.wa.qov CC:Laura Murphy Alison O'Sullivan Cecile Hansen ,DEPARTMENT OF ARCHAEOLOGY &HISTORIC PRESERVATION :i '1/"Protectthe Past,,Shape the Future _'QCity.Re n Department of Planning /Building /s ENVIRONMENTAL &L)'EVELOPMENT APPLICATT'ON REVIEW SHEET REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: APPLICATION NO:LUA05-161,SA-H,SA-M,ECF DATE CIRCULATED:JANUARY 9,2006 APPLICANT:Jim Manion,Lowe's HIW PROJECT MANAGER:Keri Weaver PROJECT TITLE:Lowe's of Renton PLAN REVIEW:Jan Illian SITE AREA:9.79 acres LOCATION:800 Garden Avenue N COMMENTS DUE:JANUARY 23,2006 BUILDING AREA (gross):128,277 square feet WORK ORDER NO:77528 SUMMARY OF PROPOSAL:Applicant is requesting master plan and site development plan approval and SEPA review,for aLowe's Home Improvement retail store totalling 128,277 sq.ft.with a 28,712 sq.ft.garden area and 428 parking spaces.The site islocatedat800GardenAve.N,at the intersection of Park Ave.N and Garden Ave.N. A.ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT (e.g.Non-Code)COMMENTS Element of the Probable Probable MoreEnvironmentMinorMajorInformationImpactsImpactsNecessary Earth Air Water Plants Land/Shoreline Use -" Animals Environmental Health Energy/ Natural Resources Element of the Probable Probable MoreEnvironmentMinorMajorInformationImpactsImpactsNecessary Housin Aesthetics Light/Glare Recreation Utilities Transportation Public Services Historic/Cultural Preservation Airport Environment10,000 Feet14,000 Feet B.POLICY-RELATED COMMENTS C."CODE-RELATED COMMENTS We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas in which we have expertise and have identified areas of probable impact or areas where aditional information h neee to properly assess this proposal. <x "_Signatur of ictor or A-uthorize:l Rprentative "Date (,(,i Washingo S;ae Depar:nen o Traaspo':to Douglas B.MacDonaSd Secretary of Transportation January 13,2005 H/V7"F,fVIAIG P.O.Box 330310 e'#n,,,.Seattle,WA 98133-9710 "E-G-" 206-440-4000 TI-Y:1-800-833-6388 www.wsdot.wa.gov Keri Weaver City of Renton Planning 1055 South Grady Way Renton,WA 98055 Subject:Loew's of Renton (128,277 ftz retail) LUA05-161,SA-H,SA-M,ECF SR 405 MP 4.5 (SR 900 vicinity) Dear Ms.Weaver: We thank you for giving Washington State Department of Transportation (WSDOT)this opportunity to comment through SEPA on the above referenced development.We would like to review the Transportation Impact Analysis (TIA)prepared for this.The review of the TIA will determine if the proposed action will have any impacts on the State Highway System, particularly SR 900 and the ramps at 1-405. If you have any questions,or require additional information please contact Felix Palisoc of our Developer Services section by phone at 206-440-4713,or via e-mail at palisof@wsdot.wa,go','. Sincerely,,it R "nPazooki Local Agency and Development Services Manager RP:fsp C:\FeBx_DevServ\SEPA_ResponsesksepaRENTON_SR405MP5Lowes.doc NOTICE OF APPLICATION AND PROPOSED DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE-MITIGATED (DNS-M) DATE:January9,2006 LAND USENUMBER:LUAOE-161,SA-H,SA-M,ECF PROJECT NAME:Lowe's of Renton PROJECT DESCRIPTION:Applicant is requesting master plan and site development plan approval and$EPA review,for a Lowe's Home Improvement retail store totalling 128,277 sq.ft.with a 28,712 sq.f.garden area and428parkingspacesThesiteislocatedat800GardenAveN,at the interseclion of Park Ave.Nand Garden Ave.N. PROJECT LOCATION:800 Garden AvenueN OPTIONAL DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE,MITIGATED (DNS-M):Asthe LeadAgency,the City of RentonhasdelerminedthatsignificantenvironmentalimpactsareunlikelytoresultfromIheproposedproject.Therefore,aspomllttedundertheRCW43.21CA10,the City ofRenton is using the Optional DNS-M process to give notice that a DNS-M is likely to be issued.Comment periods for the projectand the proposed DNS-M are integrated into a single commentperiod.There win be no comment period following the issuance of the Threshold Determination of Non-Significance-Mitigated (DNS*M).A14-day appeal period will follow the issuance of the DNS-M. PERMtT APPLICATION DATE:December 14,2005 January 9,2006 Paul Manzer,PACLAND;Tel:(425)453-9501 ; Eml:pmanzer@pacland.com Environmental (BEPA)Review,Hearing Examiner Site Plan,Administrative Master Plan approval Building,Fire,Utility,&Construction Permits Geotachnical &Traffic Study,Drainage,Grading,Utilities & Landscaping Reports NOTICE OF COMPLETE APPLICATION: APPLICANT/PROJECT CONTACT PERSON: Permits/Review Requested: OtherPermits whichmay be required: Requested Studies: Location where application maybereviewed: PUBLIC HEARING: CONSISTENCYOVERVIEW: Zoning/Land Use: Environmental Documents thatEvaluatetheProposedProject: Development RegulationsUsedForProjectMitigation: Planning/Building/Public Works Department,Development Services Division,Sixth Floor Rentoe City Hall,1088 South GradyWay,Renton,WA lt8058 Public iearincI istentutivelv scheduled forFebruary 28.2008before Ihe RentonHeadnoExaminerinRentonCouncilChambers,Hearings begin at 9:00 AM onthe7thfloorofthenewRentonCityHalllocatedat1055SouthGredyWay, The subject site is designated Urban Center North-1 (UCN-1)onthe CityofRentonComprehensiveLandUseMapandCommercialontheCity's ZoningMap Environmental (SEPA)Checklist The project will be subject to the City's SEPA ordinance,RMC,(StormwatelGrading,Roads,Zoning)and other applicable codes and regulations a approphate, Proposed Mitigation Measures:The following Mitigation Measures will likely be imposed on the proposed projectTheserecommendedMitigationMeasuresaddressprojectimpactsnotcoveredbyexistingcodesandregulationsascitedabove. •The applicant willbe required to paythe approlate Transportation Mitigation Fee; •The applicant will be requiredto paythe appropriate Fire Mitigation Fee;and •The applicant will be requiredto paytheappropriate Parks Mitigation Fee, Comments on the above application must be submitted in writing 1o Keri Weaver,Senior Planner,Development Services Division,t085 South Grady Way,Renton,WA 9808£;,by8:00 PM on January23,lt008.This matter isalso tentatively scheduled for a public hearing on February 28,2006,at 9:00 AM.Council Chambers,Seventh Floor.Renton City Hall,1055 South Grady Way,Renton.If you are inferesled in attending the hearing,please contact theDevelopmentServicesDivisiontoensurethatthehearinghasnotbeenreschedutedat(425)430-72lt2 If commentscannotbesubmittedinwritingbythedateindicatedabove,you may sliIFappear at the hearing and present yourcomments on the proposal before the Headng Examiner.If you have queshons about this proposal,orwish Io be made a party ofrecordandreceiveadditionalinformationbymail,please contact the project manager.Anyone who submits writtencommentswillautomaticallybecomeapartyofrecordandwillbenotifiedofanydecisiononthisproject. CONTACT PERSON:Keri Weaver,Senior Planner;Tel:(425)430-7382 PLEASE INCLUDE THE PROJECT NUMBERWHEN CALLING FOR PROPER FILE IDENTIFICATION Ifyou would like to be made a party of record to receive further information on this proposed project,complete this form and return to:Cityof Renton,Development Planning,1055 So.Grady Way,Renton,WA 98055. Name/File No.:Lowe's of RentonlLUA05-161,SA-H,SA-M,ECF NAME: MAILINGADDRESS: TELEPHONE NO.: CERTIFICATION I,//ft["//'g'/J ,hereby certify that ,3 copies of the above document were posted by me in ._..3__conspicuous places or nearby the described property on ATTEST:Subscribed and sworn before me,a Notary Public,in and for the State of Win '-'.(l,)p ,onthe ]£')q day of '/"200 . NOTARY PUBLIC SIGNATURE: CITY OF RENTON CURRENT PLANNING DIVISION AFFIDAVIT OF SERVICE BY MAILING On the 9th day of January,2006,I deposited in the mails of the United States,a sealed envelope containing Acceptance Ltr &NOA documents.This information was sent to: Name Paul Manzer,PACLAND -Accpt Ltr Contact Steve Pesce,PACLAND -Accpt Ltr Contact Dash-80,L.P.-Accpt Ltr &NOA Owner Jim Manion,Lowe's HIW -Accpt Ltr &NOA Applicant Surrounding Property Owners -NOA Only See Attached Representing (Signature of Sender),,"=,J,/,/ STATE OF WASHiNGTON )v )ssCOUNTYOFKING) CHARLE.S F.KOKKO:t'NOTARY PUBLIC '!STATE 0F WASHINGTON COMItfl3SiON EXPIRES I certify that I know or have satisfactory evidence that Stacy Tucker MARCH 19,2006 signed this instrument and acknowledged it to be his/her/their free and voluntary act for the uges ac purposes mentioned in the instrument. Dated:[/f/O£, Notary (Print): My appointment expires: Notary Public in and for the State of Washington F, JeF amp-e Project:Name:....Lowe's of Renton Project Number:LUA05-161,SA-H,SA-M,ECF 082305919001 AURORA ACRES INC PO BOX 15236 SEATTLE WA 98115 082305916700 BALTIMORE APARTMENT LLC 1915 MAPLE VALLEY HWY RENTON WA 98055 088660002002 BOEING REALTY CORP 15480 LAGUNA CANYON RD #200 IRVINE CA 92618 082305903302;082305902700 BURLINGTON NORTHERN SANTA F A'l-l'N :PROPERTY TAX PO BOX 96189 FORT WORTH TX 76161 082305916502;082305919308; 082305919407;082305920504, 082305921908 PARK DRIVE I LLC C/O GARY MELINO CONST CO 9125 10TH AV S SEA'I-FLE WA 98108 082305921700 DASH 80 LP 440 N FIRST ST #200 SAN JOSE CA 95112 082305917104;082305921809 PARK DRIVE II LLC 9125 10TH AV S SEAI-I'LE WA 98108 082305916809 HOWARD ENTERPRISES INC AI-I'N LAURIE MCGIBBON PO BOX 79014 SEATTLE WA 98119 NOTICE OF APPLICATION AND PROPOSED DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE-MITIGATED (DNS-M) DATE:January 9,2006 LAND USE NUMBER:LUA05-161,SA-H,SA-M,ECF PROJECT NAME:Lowe's of Renton PROJECT DESCRIPTION:Applicant is requesting master plan and site development plan approval and SEPA review,for a Lowe's Home Improvement retail store totalling 128,277 sq.ft.with a 28,712 sq.ft.garden area and 428 parking spaces.The site is located at 800 Garden Ave.N,at the intersection of Park Ave.N and Garden Ave.N. PROJECT LOCATION:800 Garden Avenue N OPTIONAL DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE,MITIGATED (DNS-M):As the Lead Agency,the City of Renton has determined that significant environmental impacts are unlikely to result from the proposed project.Therefore,as permitted under the RCW 43.21C.110,the City of Renton is using the Optional DNS-M process to give notice that a DNS- M is likely to be issued.Comment periods for the project and the proposed DNS-M are integrated into a single comment period.There will be no comment period following the issuance of the Threshold Determination of Non-Significance- Mitigated (DNS-M).A 14-day appeal period will follow the issuance of the DNS-M. PERMIT APPLICATION DATE:December 14,2005 NOTICE OF COMPLETE APPLICATION:January 9,2006 APPLICANT/PROJECT CONTACT PERSON:Paul Manzer,PACLAND;Tel:(425)453-9501; Emh pmanzer@pacland.com Permits/Review Requested:Environmental (SEPA)Review,Hearing Examiner Site Plan, Administrative Master Plan approval Other Permits which may be required:Building,Fire,Utility,&Construction Permits Requested Studies:Geotechnical &Traffic Study,Drainage,Grading,Utilities & Landscaping Reports Location where application may be reviewed:Planning/Building/Public Works Department,Development Services Division,Sixth Floor Renton City Hall,1055 South Grady Way,Renton,WA 98055 PUBLIC HEARING:Public hearinq is tentatively scheduled for February 28,2006 before the Renton Hearin.q Examiner in Renton Council Chambers.Hearings begin at 9:00 AM on the 7th floor of the new Renton City Hall located at 1055 South Grady Way. CONSISTENCY OVERVIEW: Zoning/Land Use:The subject site is designated Urban Center North -1 (UCN-1)on the City of Renton Comprehensive Land Use Map and Commercial on the City's Zoning Map. Environmental Documents that Evaluate the Proposed Project:Environmental (SEPA)Checklist Development Regulations Used For Project Mitigation:The project will be subject to the City's SEPA ordinance,RMC,(Stormwater, Grading,Roads,Zoning)and other applicable codes and regulations as appropriate. © Proposed Mitigation Measures:The following Mitigation Measures will likely be imposed on the proposed project. These recommended Mitigation Measures address project impacts not coveredbyexistingcodesandregulationsascitedabove. =The applicant will be required to pay the appropriate Transportation Mitigation Fee; °The applicant will be requiredto pay the appropriate Fire Mitigation Fee,and []The applicantwill be required to pay the appropriate Parks Mitigation Fee. Comments on the above application must be submitted in writing to Keri Weaver,Senior Planner,Development Services Division,1055 South Grady Way,Renton,WA 98055,by 5:00 PM on January 23,2006.This matter is also tentatively scheduled for a public hearing on February 28,2006,at 9:00 AM,Council Chambers,Seventh Floor,Renton City Hall,1055 South Grady Way,Renton.If you are interested in attending the hearing,please contact theDevelopmentServicesDivisiontoensurethatthehearinghasnotbeenrescheduledat(425)430-7282.If comments cannot be submitted in writing by the date indicated above,you may still appear at the hearing and present your comments on the proposal before the Hearing Examiner.If you have questions about this proposal,or wish to be made a party ofrecordandreceiveadditionalinformationbymail,please contact the project manager.Anyone who submits writtencommentswillautomaticallybecomeapartyofrecordandwillbenotifiedofanydecisiononthisproject. CONTACT PERSON:Keri Weaver,Senior Planner;Tel!(425)430-7382 I PLEASE'iNcLUDETHEROJECT=JBEWNENCALL,NGFoRPRoPER FILE IDENTIFICATION !. If you would like to be made a party of record to receive further information on this proposed project,complete this form and return to:City of Renton,Development Planning,1055 So.Grady Way,Renton,WA 98055. Name/File No.:Lowe's of Renton/LUA05-161,SA-H,SA-M,ECF NAME: MAILING ADDRESS: TELEPHONE NO.: _KathyKeolker,Mayor CITY (?RENTON i Planning/Building/PublicWorks Department Gregg Zimmerman P.E.,Administrator January 9,2006 Paul Manzer or Steve PescePACLAND 11235 SE 6th Street #220 Bellevue,WA 98004 Subject:Lowe's of Renton LUA05-161,SA-H,SA-M,ECF Dear Mr:Manzer/Pesce: The Development Planning Section of the City of Renton has determined that the •subject application is complete according to submittal requirements and,therefore,is accepted for review. It is tentatively scheduled for consideration bythe Environmental ReviewCommittee on January 31,2006.Prior to that review,you will be notified if any additional information is required to continue processing your application. In addition,this matter is tentatively scheduled for a Public Hearing on FebruarY 28, 2006 at 9:00 AM,Council Chambers,Seventh Floor,Renton City Hall,1055 South Grady Way,Renton.The applicant or representative(s)of the applicant•are required to be present at the public hearing,A copy of the staff report will be mailed to you one week before the hearing. Please contact me at (425)430-7382 if you have any questions. Sincerely, Keri Weaver Senior Planner cc:Dash-80,L.P./Owner Jim Manion,Lowe's HIW/Applicant Rick Ford/Boeing 1055 South Grady Way -Renton,Washington 98055 o oThispapercontains50Vorecycledmaterial,30 Vo )ost consumer AHEAD OF THE CURVE ,=, 17 '1 City of Renton ,% LA N D U S E P E p M =T °,o,,I IIWI HI {,,,-,, 2,./5"3MASTERAPPLICA'TION**C* PROPERTY OWNER(S) NAME:Dash-80,L.P. ADDRESS:440 North First Street Suite 200 CITY:San Jose zip:95112 TELEPHONE NUMBER:Fax:408-274-7227 APPLICANT (if other than owner) NAME:Jim Manion COMPANY (if applicable):Lowe's HIW ADDRESS:1530 Faraday Avenue #140 CITY:Carlsbad,CA ZIP:92008 TELEPHONE NUMBER (760)804-5308 CONTACT PERSON NAME:......Paul Manzer I Steve Pesce COMPANY (if applicable):PACLAND ADDRESS:11235 SE 6TM St Suite 220 CITY:Bellevue ZIP:98004 TELEPHONE NUMBER AND E-MAIL ADDRESS: (425)453-9501 IrnanzerDacland.com /spesceDacland.com PROJECT IN FORMATION PROJECT OR DEVELOPMENT NAME:Lowe's of Renton PROJECT/ADDRESS(S)/LOCATION AND ZIP CODE: 800 GARDEN AV N,Renton,WA 98055 KING COUNTY ASSESSOR'S ACCOUNT NUMBER(S): 082305921700 EXISTING LAND USE(S):Abandoned Boeing Parking Lot PROPOSED LAND USE(S):Retail Development EXISTING COMPREHENSIVE PLAN MAP DESIGNATION: Urban Center North PROPOSED COMPREHENSIVE PLAN MAP DESIGNATION (if applicable):Urban Center North EXISTING ZONING:UC-N1 PROPOSED ZONING (if applicable):UC-N1 SITE AREA (in square feet):426,333 SQUARE FOOTAGE OF PUBLIC ROADWAYS TO BE DEDICATED:NIA SQUARE FOOTAGE OF PRIVATE ACCESS EASEMENTS: NIA PROPOSED RESIDENTIAL DENSITY IN UNITS PER NET ACRE (if applicable):NIA NUMBER OF PROPOSED LOTS (if applicable):N/A NUMBER OF NEW DWELLING UNITS (if applicable):NIA Q:web/pw/devserv/forms/planning/masterapp.doc 1 12/14/05 PROJlCT INFORMATION (continu ') NUMBER OF EXISTING DWELLING UNITS (if applicable): N/A SQUARE FOOTAGE OF PROPOSED RESIDENTIAL BUILDINGS (if applicable):NIA SQUARE FOOTAGE OF EXISTING RESIDENTIAL BUILDINGS TO REMAIN (if applicable):N/A SQUARE FOOTAGE OF PROPOSED NON-RESIDENTIAL BUILDINGS (if applicable): 128,277 (Garden Center -29,712) SQUARE FOOTAGE OF EXISTING NON-RESIDENTIAL BUILDINGS TO REMAIN (if applicable):N/A NET FLOOR AREA OF NON-RESIDENTIAL BUILDINGS (if applicable):128,277 (Garden Center-29,712) NUMBER OF EMPLOYEES TO BE EMPLOYED BY THE NEW PROJECT (if applicable):125 PROJECT VALUE:$6,600,000 IS THE SITE LOCATED IN ANY TYPE OF ENVIRONMENTALLY CRITICAL AREA,PLEASE INCLUDE SQUARE FOOTAGE (if applicable): n AQUIFER PROTECTION AREA ONE n AQUIFER PROTECTION AREA TWO C3 FLOOD HAZARD AREA sq.ft. E]GEOLOGIC HAZARD sq.ft. n HABITAT CONSERVATION sq.ft. r SHORELINE STREAMS AND LAKES sq.ft. r7 WETLANDS sq.ft. LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF PROPERTY (Attach legal description on separate sheet with the following information included) SITUATE IN THE NW &NE QUARTER OF SECTION ....8_8,TOWNSHIP 23N_,RANGE 5E,IN THECITYOFRENTON,KING COUNTY,WASHINGTON. TYPE OF APPLICATION &FEES List all land use applications being applied for: 1.HEX Master Plan 3. 2.HEX Site Plan 4. Environmental Review (SEPA) Staff will calculate applicable fees and postage:$ AFFIDAVIT OF OWNERSHIP ',(PdntName/s).<"'i¢C;€'K/declare that am (please check one)the current owner of the property involved in this application or the authoriz]representative to act for a corporation (please attach proofo-uthor zat on)and that the foregoing sta'nents aherein contained and the information herewith are in all respects true and correct to the best of my knowledge and belief. /.///(J I certify that I know or have satisfactory evidence thatb'D /,t .,-signed this instrument and acknowledged it to be his/h a-"r e/"J -\\"_i ,.I J uses and purposes mentioned in the instrument. lnauture of Ownerlsentative) Notary Public in and for the State of Washington (Signature of Owner/Representative) Notary (Print). Q:web/pw/devserv/forms/plarming/masterapp.doe My appointment expires: 2 12/14/05 LEGAL DESCRIPTION THAT PORTION OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER AND THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 8, TOWNSHIP 23 NORTH,RANGE 5 EAST,WILLAMETTE MERIDIAN,IN KING COUNTY,WASHINGTON, DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: BEGINNING AT THE INTERSECTION OF THE SOUTH LINE OF SAID NORTHWEST QUARTER WITH THE EASTERLY MARGIN OF GARDEN AVENUE NORTH,AS CONVEYED TO THE CITY OF RENTON BY DEED RECORDED UNDER RECORDING NUMBER 5535459; THENCE SOUTH 89028'22''EAST ALONG SAID SOUTH LINE 603.26 FEET TO A MONUMENT IN CASE HELD AS THE CENTER OF SAID SECTION; THENCE SOUTH 89°30'10''EAST 35.59 FEET TO A POINT ON THE WESTERLY MARGIN OF THE PACIFIC COAST RAILROAD CO.RIGHT OF WAY,SAID POINT BEING UPON A CURVE TO THE RIGHT,FROM WHICH THE CENTER BEARS NORTH 52020'38''EAST,810.39 FEET;THENCE NORTHERLY ALONG SAID MARGIN AN ARC LENGTH OF 277.62 FEET TO THE POINT OF TANGENCY; THENCE NORTH 18001'40''WEST ALONG SAID WESTERLY MARGIN 1,995.11 FEET TO AN INTERSECTION WITH THE SOUTHERLY MARGIN OF THE WASHINGTON STATE HIGHWAY (PSH-1)NORTH RENTON INTERCHANGE A-LINE RIGHT OF WAY; THENCE SOUTH 49005'06''WEST ALONG SAID SOUTHERLY MARGIN 406.82 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 3 l°53'55''WEST ALONG SAID SOUTHERLY MARGIN 62.78 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 08°39'15''EAST 47.07 FEET TO A POINT ON THE EASTERLY MARGIN OF SAID GARDEN AVENUE NORTH; THENCE SOUTH 18000'30''EAST ALONG SAID EASTERLY MARGIN 1,289.97 FEET TO THE POINT OF CURVATURE OF A CURVE TO THE RIGHT HAVING A RADIUS OF 910.00 FEET;THENCE ALONG SAID MARGIN CURVING TO THE RIGHT,AN ARC LENGTH OF 293.83 FEET TO THE POINT OF TANGENCY; THENCE SOUTH 00029'31"WEST ALONG SAID EASTERLY MARGIN 253.42 FEET TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING. Q:web/pw/devserv/forms/planning/masterapp.doc 3 12/14/05 State of California County of Sra ,+ ss. NSee Attached Document (Notary to cross out lines 1-6 below) []See Statement Below (Lines 1-5 to be completed only by document signer[s],not Notary) .J Signature of Document Signer No.1 Signature of Document Signer No.2 (if any) Subscribed and sworn to (or affirmed)before me on this lq'kdayof i'3 ,"?-,,'OEL,by Date Month Year Name of Signer .Proved to me on the basis of satisfactory evidence to be the person who appeared before me (.)(,) (and (2)//"Name of Signer ' []Personally known to me []Proved to me on the basis of satisfactory evidence to beo aped before me.) _Signature'of Notary Public Place Notary Seal Above OPTIONAL Though the information below is not required by law,it may prove valuable to persons relying on the document and could prevent fraudulent removal and reattachment of this form to another document. Further Description of Any Attached Document Title or Type of Document:'L,I(LL 42vl{VC4(J)I#II, Document Date:.{IO..Number of Pages: Signer(s)Other Than Named Above: Top of thumb here Top of thumb here @24Natina1NtaryAssciatin935DetAveÈEx242ChatswrthA91313-242wwwNatinaNtary.rgItem#5910 Reorder:Call TolI-Free1-800-876-6827 CONSENT OF PARTNERS The undersigned,REDLOK,LLC,a Califomia Limited Liability Company,THE TAW, L.P.,a California Limited Partnership,and QUALITY REAL ESTATE MANGEMENT, LLC,a California Limited Liability Company,being all of the partners of DASH-80,L.P., A Washington Limited Partnership ("the Partnership"),do hereby consent to the QUALITY REAL ESTATE MANAGEMENT,LLC,the General Partner of the Partnership,by and through its Manager,RICHARD SINGER,EXECUTING ANY AND ALL DOCUMENTS REQUIRED BY THE City ofRenton,state of Washington,in connection with the Partnership's Application for a Land Use Permit. RICHARD SINGER,as the Manager of QUALITY REAL ESTATE MANAGEMENT, LLC,the General Partner of DASH-80,L.P.,is authorized to act on behalf of the Partnership in all matters. Dated:December/___,2005 Redlok,LLC,a California Limited Katl@n J.'KoldNlranager The TAW,L.P.,a California Limited Partnership,Limited Partner,by R.D.J.,LLC,a California Limited Liability Company,General Partner David A.Fry,Member Quality Real Estate Management,LLC,a nger er Quality/Dash-80/Partner Consent J DEVELOPMENT PLANNINCITYOFRENTON DEC !2005 II!OI!IVI!I) PRE-APPLICATION COMMENTS PROJECT DATE: STAFF COMMENTS: Lowe's Park Avenue N and Garden Avenue N PRE 05-139 October 20,2005 @ 9:00 a.m. FIRE PREVENTION-Jim Gray PUBLIC WORKS/UTILITIES -Jan Illian CONSTRUCTION SERVICES -Larry Meckling NO Building Comments at this time PLANNING -Nancy Weil SUPPLEMENTAL INFORMATION:ZONING MAP SITE AERIAL WAIVER SHEET \\ M E FIRE DEPARTMENT M O R A N D U DATE: TO: FROM: SUBJECT: October 12,2005 Nancy Weil,Senior Planner James Gray,Assistant Fire Marshal( Lowe's Garden Ave N and Park Avg.N M Fire Department Comments: 1.The preliminary fire flow is 8000 GPM,one hydrant is required within 150 feet of the structure and seven additional hydrants are required within 300 feet of the structure. 2.A fire mitigation fee of $66,704.04 is required based on $.52 per square foot of the building square footage.. 3.Separate plans and permits are required for the installation of fire alarm and sprinkler systems. 4.Fire department access roadways are required to within 150 feet of all portions of the building exterior.Roadways are a minimum 20 feet in width with a turning radius of 45 feet outside and 25 feet inside.Fire Lane are required on all sides ofthe building. 5.Fire department dead end access roadways over 150 feet in length are required to have an approved turnaround. 6.Provide a list of flammable,combustible liquids or hazardous chemicals that are used or stored on site. Please feel free to contact me if you have any questions. i:\lowe'sbldg.doc TO:Nancy Weil FROM:Jan Illian DATE:October 20,2005 CITY OF RENTON MEMO UTILITY REVIEW SUBJECT:PREAPPLICATON REVIEW COMMENTS LOWE'S SITE PLAN REVIEW PREAPP NO.05-139 N.8TH Garden Avenue N. NOTE ON PRELIMINARY REVIEW COMMENTS CONTAINED IN THIS REPORT: The following comments on development and permitting issues are based on the pre-application submittals made to the City of Renton by the applicant.The applicant is cautioned that information contained in this summary may be subject to modification and/or concurrence by official decision makers (e.g.Hearing Examiner,Boards of Adjustment,Board of Public Works and City Council).Review comments may also need to be revised based on site planning and other design changes required by the City or made by the applicant. WATER 1.Water System Development Charges (SDC)of $0.213 per square foot of gross site area will apply.A redevelopment credit may apply for existing water connections on the site.This is payable at the time the utility permit is issued. There is an existing 12-inch water main in Garden Ave North.Pressure in the vicinity is approximately 125 psi.A pressure-reducing valve will be required.The proposed project is located in the 320 Pressure Zone and is not inside an Aquifer Protection Zone.Derated fire flow in the vicinity is 4,000 gpm. Preliminary fire flow requirement calculated by the fire department is 8,000 gpm.Applicant will need to reduce the fire flow to meet the 4,000 gpm available. All new construction shall have a primary fire hydrant capable ofproviding a minimum of 1,000 gpm located within 150 feet of the structure.Additional hydrants will be required to be within 300 feet.There are fire hydrants in the vicinity that may be counted towards the fire protection of this project,but are subject to verification for being within 150 feet of the nearest comer of the building.Existing hydrants to be counted as fire protection will be required to be retrofitted with a quick disconnect "Storz"fitting ifnot already in place. Extension of a 12-inch water main on site providing a looped system around the building and installation ofhydrantswillberequired. A fire sprinkler system is required by the fire department.A separate no-fee utility permit and separate plans will be required for the installation of the double detector check valve assembly for fire sprinkler line. All devices installed shall be per the latest Department of Health "Approved List"of Backflow Prevention Devices.Location of device shall be shown on the civil plans and shall show note:"Separate plans and utility permit for DDCVA installation for Fire Sprinkler System will be required".DDCVA installations outside the building shall be in accordance with the City ofRenton Standards. . . . . . Lowes Site Plan Review October 20,2005 , For DDCVA installations proposed inside the building,applicant shall submit a copy of the mechanical plan showing the location and installation of the backflow assembly inside the mechanical room. Installation shall be in accordance with the City of Renton's requirements.DDCVA shall be installed immediately after the pipe has passed through the building floor slab.Installation of devices shall be in the horizontal position only. Ifbuilding exceeds 30 feet in height,a backflow device will be required to be installed on the domestic water meter. SANITARY SEWER °Sewer System Development Charges (SDC)of $0.126 per square foot of gross site area will apply.A redevelopment credit may apply for existing water service on the site.This is payable at the time the utility permit is issued. 2.There is an existing 8-inch sewer main in Garden Ave N. 3.Iffood preparation facilities are proposed,a grease trap or grease interceptor will be required. SURFACE WATER 1.There are existing storm facilities in Garden Ave N. 2.A storm drainage plan and drainage report is required.The drainage plan shall include provision for detention and water quality treatment sized for the new impervious surface subject to vehicular access per the KCSWM 1990 Edition.All core requirements and any special requirements shall be addressed in the report. 3.Surface Water System Development Charges (SDC)are assessed based on the total new impervious surface square footage as reflected in the final design.The charge is determined by multiplying the gross square footage by $0.249.These are payable at the time the utility construction permit is issued. STREET IMPROVEMENTS 1.The traffic mitigation fees will be assessed at time of site development. 2.Half street improvements including,but not limited to paving,sidewalks,curb &gutter,storm drainage,street signs,street lights are required if not already in place. 3.City staff will recommend the proposed southern driveway location shown on the site plan in Garden be approved.This location aligns with N.10th,a new street that will connect Garden Ave N.and Park Ave N.as part of the Lakeshore Landing development.The driveway location shown to the north in Garden appears to be acceptable. All wire utilities shall be installed underground per the City ofRenton Undergrounding Ordinance.If three or more poles are required to be moved by the development design,all existing overhead utilities shall be placed underground. . GENERAL COMMENTS . . All construction utility permits for utilities,drainage and street improvements will require separate plan submittals.All utility plans shall conform to the Renton Drafting Standards,which are attached for reference. Plans shall be prepared by a licensed Civil Engineer. When the utility plans are complete,please submit three (3)copies of the drawings,two (2)copies ofthe drainage report; permit application and an itemized cost of construction estimate and application fee at the counter on the sixth floor.A fee worksheet is attached for your use,but prior to preparing a check,it is recommended to call 425-430-7266 for a fee estimate as generated by the permit system. Lowes Site Plan Review October 20,2005 . The fee for review and inspection of these improvements is 5%of the first $100,000 of the estimated construction costs;4%of anything over $100,000 but less than $200,000,and 3%of anything over $200,000. Halfthe fee must be paid upon application. A SEPA condition will require this project to comply with Dept of Ecology's 2001 Stormwater Management Manual for Erosion Control. 4.Separate permits and fees for water meters,side sewers,irrigation meters,and backflow devices will be required. ce:Kayren Kittrick CITY OF RENTON Planning/Building/Public Works MEMORANDUM DATE: TO: FROM: SUBJECT: October 20,2005 Pre-Application File No.05-139 Nancy Well,Senior Planner,430-425-7270 Lowe's Home Improvement Retail Use- SE corner of Park Avenue N and Garden Avenue N General:We have completed a preliminary review of the pre-application for the above-referenced development proposal.The following comments on development and permitting issues are based on the pre-application submittals made to the City of Renton by the applicant and the codes in effect on the date of review.The applicant is cautioned that information contained in this summary may be subject to modification and/or concurrence by official decision-makers (e.g.,Hearing Examiner,Zoning Administrator,Board of Adjustment,Board of Public Works,and City Council).Review comments may also need to be revised based on site planning and other design changes required by City staff or made by the applicant.The applicant is encouraged to review all applicable sections of the Renton Municipal Code.The Development Regulations are available for purchase for $50.00,plus tax,from the Finance Division on the first floor of City Hall or the City website at www.ci.renton.wa.us Project Proposal:The applicant is requesting a pre-application review for the construction of an approximate 130,000 square foot retail building with 30,000 square foot garden center.The site area is 9.79 acres (426,333 square feet).The one story structure is sited on the northern end of the proposed parcel with the main access off of Garden Avenue N.A Service access is shown via an existing connection across Burlington Northern property to Houser Avenue N.Approximately 400surfaceparkingstallsareproposed. Zoning:The subject site is designated Urban Center North 1 (UC-N1)on the City's Zoning Map.The UC-N1 zone is to provide an area for pedestrian-scale mixed-use development.The overall mix and intensity of uses is intended to create an urban rather than suburban character.The form of development is expected to use urban development standards. Development Standards:The proposal for the construction of the retail use shall be in compliance with the UC-N1 zone development standards and Urban Center Design Overlay Regulations as addressed in this review.The site is located in District C of the Urban Center. Urban Design Overlay -District C:The subject site is located in District C of the Urban Center Overlay District.The Urban Design Regulations establish two categories of regulations:(a)"minimum standards"that must be met and (b)"guidelines",while not mandatory,are considered in determining iftheproposedactionmeetstheintentofthedesignguidelines. Lot Size:-Minimum lot size of 25 acres may be amended through Site Development Plan Review. Lot Covera,qe and Hei.qht -The UC-N zone has maximum lot coverage of 90%or 100%if parking is provided within a structure.Maximum building height is 10 stories along primary and secondary arterials. Setbacks-The UC-N zone does not have a minimum front,side or rear yard,however does have a maximum of 5-foot front and side along a street setback. Landscaping -All portions of the site not covered by structures,required parking,access,circulation or service area shall be maintained as permeable areas and improved with native,drought-resistant vegetative cover.Reference Urban Center Design Overlay Regulations -District C for additional requirements for landscaping. Lowe's Home Improvement Retail Use October 20,2005 Pre-Application Meeting Page 2 of 4 Screenin.q/Outdoor Stora.qe -Screening must be provided for all surface-mounted and roof top utility and mechanical equipment.In addition,garbage dumpsters and recyclable areas must be screened pursuant to RMC section 4-4-090C7.Approval of the proposed locations of dumpster areas by Rainier Waste Management is recommended.Requirements for outdoor loading,repair,maintenance or work areas;outdoor storage,refuse or dumpster areas shall be in compliance pursuant to RMC section 4-4-095 (copy included in packet). Screening of outdoor loading and storage areas must be screened pursuant to RMC section 4-4-095. Access:Access to the proposed site from two ingress/egress points onto Garden Avenue N.These access points shall align with proposal on the west side of Garden Avenue N.Additionally,applicant shall provide right to use access across Burlington Northern property to the north east. Parking -The parking regulations require that a specific number of off-street parking stalls based on the amount of square footage dedicated to certain uses be provided entirely within the boundaries of the property.The applicant proposes 400 parking stalls.The following ratios are applicable to the project:a minimum of 4 parking spaces per 1,000 square feet of net floor area and a maximum of 5 parking spaces per 1,000 square feet of net floor area. Reference Urban Center Design Overlay Regulations -District C for additional requirements for parking layout and parking lot landscaping. An aisle width of 24 feet is required for 90 degree parking stalls and a width of 18 feet is required for parallel stalls.ADA accessible stalls must be a minimum of 8 feet in width by 20 feet in length,with an adjacent access aisle of 8 feet in width for van accessible spaces.The number of ADA spaces required is dependent upon the total number of parking spaces required.Compact spaces are allowedupto50percentofthetotalrequiredparkingforstructuredparking. Loading -In the requirements for Loading Space Standards,RMC 4-4-080J,all new buildings shall provide off-street loading space if the activity carried in the building requires deliveries to it of people or merchandise.Loading space is in addition to required off-street parking. :The applicant will be required to demonstrate how building,parking lot and any site lighting would not "spill"over into adjacent properties surrounding the subject site.A detailed lighting plan may be requested to be submitted at the time of building permits. Si¢lna(:]e:The site is located within the City Center Sign boundaries where specific regulations are applicable.However,residential occupancies within this overlay area are subject to the requirements of RMC 4-4-100.E.4.a.Two on-premise identifying signs of not over (32 sq.ft.in area on one face are permitted.The signs may be illuminated but not animated,shall be for location identification only and shall display no copy,symbol or device other than that in keeping with the development.Freestanding signs shall not be higher than six ft.above any established grade and shall not be any closer than 10 ft.to any street or five ft.to any side property line.Signs also must be out of the clear vision zone. At the time of the sign permit(s),the applicant will need to clearly identify square footages the sign in order to determine compliance.Reference Urban Center Design Overlay Regulations -District Cforadditionalrequirements. General Analysis:The conceptual site plan appears to generally comply with the development standards though staff review was somewhat limits due to level of detail provided.The applicant shall further address the Design Regulations,specifically to the fa(;:ade,entrance orientation,pedestrian access,screening and landscaping.The conceptual proposal did not address signage or lighting,bothshallbeprovidedaspartoftheformalapplication. Comprehensive Land Use:Site is located within the Urban Center North Comprehensive Land Use Map designation. Policy CD-35.Each gateway should have unique,identifiable design treatment in terms of landscaping,building design,signage,street furniture,paving,and street width.Special consideration of gateway function should be demonstrated through design of these elements. Objective CD-G:Architecture should be distinctive and contribute to the community aesthetic. Policy CD-40.Structures should be designed (e.g.building height,orientation,materials,color and bulk;)to mitigate potential adverse impacts,such as glare or shadows on adjacent less intense land uses and transportation corridors. Lowe's Home Improvement Retail Use October 20,2005 Pre-Application Meeting Page 3 of 4 Policy CD-41.Rooftops that can be seen from public streets,parks,or open space should be designed to hide mechanical equipment and to incorporate high-quality roofing materials. Policy 0D-42.Design characteristics in larger new developments or individual building complexes should contribute to neighborhood and/or district identity. Policy LU-204.Consolidate signage for mixed-use development. Policy LU-205.Identify major natural features and support development of new focal points that define the Center and are visually distinctive. Policy LU-206.Design focal points to include a combination of public areas such as parks or plazas, architectural features such as towers,outstanding building design,transit stops,or outdoor eating areas.These features should be connected to pedestrian pathways if possible. Policy LU-207.Evaluate existing intersections of arterial roadways for opportunities to create focal points. Policy LU-278.Support creation of a significant gateway feature within gateway nodes as shown on the Urban Center-North Gateway Map. Policy LU-282.Fully integrate signage,building height,bulk,setbacks,landscaping,and parking considerations in structures and site plans across the various components of each proposeddevelopment. Policy LU-283.Require significant pedestrian element in internal site circulation plans. Policy LU-288.Orient buildings to streets to emphasize urban character,maximize pedestrian activity and minimize automobile use within the District. Policy LU-289.Use design regulations to provide direction on site design,building design,landscape treatments,and parking and circulation. SEPA/Environmental Issues:The project would require SEPA review due to the square footage and parking spaces (greater than 4,000 sq.ft.and more than 20 parking spaces)of the proposal.The proposal would be brought to the Environmental Review Committee for review,as it is their charge to make threshold determinations for environmental checklists.Staff would likely recommend a Determination of Non-Significance-Mitigated to the Environmental Review Committee.Mitigation of impacts is accomplished through fees related to issues such as transportation and fire. Mitigation Measures:Possible mitigation measures that would be recommended for SEPA may apply to erosion control and environmental health -noise,dust control and mitigation fees. Fees:In addition to the applicable land use,building,construction and sign permit fees;the following mitigation fees for additional square footage may be required prior to the issuance of building permits: •A Transportation Mitigation Fee based on $75 per each new average daily trip attributable to the project. •A Fire Mitigation Fee based on $0.52 per sq.ft.of building area with credit for area demolished. Cultural and Archeological Resources:The SEPA checklist requires identification of this potential project element.Areas of potential cultural or historic sensitivity should be investigated using the available data bases at the State Office of Archaeology and Historic Preservation,the Renton , Historical Museum,University of Washington and State libraries.Consultation with pertinent tribesshouldalsobeconducted. The applicant would be also required that in the event any potential cultural resources are found during project construction,the contractor must stop work and contact the appropriate local and state officials and follow established protocol for culturally significant resource findings. Permit Requirements:All projects initiated that involve 4,000 sq.ft.of building area;and/or 20 or more parking spaces are subject to State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA)review.A Master Plan Review is required for the proposed development located in the UC-N zone.Public Hearing before the Hearing Examiner shall be required for Master Plan.Additionally,Site Plan review would be required.Both reviews maybe conducted concurrently. Lowe's Home Improvement Retail Use October 20,2005 Pre-Application Meeting Page 4 of 4 A public hearing would be conducted and the Hearing Examiner would issue a final decision.The project would receive a decision in an estimated time frame of 12 to 16 weeks once a complete application is accepted.The application fee would be $3,500.00 ($2,000.00 for the Hearing Examiner Master Plan Review,$1,000 for the Hearing Examiner Site Plan Review and $500.00 for SEPA review). The application fee for the Environmental Review is based on the project value as follows:less than $100,000,fee amount is $400.00;$100,000 or more,fee amount is $1,000.00.Mailing labels required for notification to surrounding property owners are provided by the city. An application for SEPA review and a handout listing all of the City's Development related fees are included in yourpacket for your review. Cc:Jennifer Henning DEVELOPMENT'SERVICES DIVISION WAIVER OF SUBMI AL REQUIREMENTS FOR LAND USE APPLICATIONS Calculations Construction Mitigation Descnption z o :::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::.x:;::::::;Densityoi e:;':::i:::!:ii !::.:!i;ii :.;:!?::::;::i!iiii:iii!!i!;iii ii!i:i::i!i;ii;ii::!iiiii:i!i!::i:i!!ii!i!!i!i!iii!iii!iiii!!iiiiiiiiiiii.i;i!:iii:iiiiiiiiiiiiiiilil iiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiii!iiiii!!i!i!iiiiilil!........:":::;::::::::'::::::::;""::::::::::::........."...........................';.:=.;,:,...,..:.:....,.................::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::.::::-:::!,::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::.........:..........:.::::::.:.::.:.T::::;!::%:;i:.!:.:i::.:!.:/:!::::::i!i:ii:.!:i:!::!!;!:!:!!!:.:::!:/:::.;.:C:.i Drainage Control Plan 2 IElevations,Architectural.AND 4 Envlronmental::GlieCklj:;.4:,;;:.:,.:::;!:..:::.;:::.:;:-:::-:::::::-::::..::::.:;,,:::::.:;.:i:!..-,..:,:,,,:,::i.!::i:::,;::::i::-i:::;::;;:...........................,...................................................................................:...............................................................:..................................... .,:.,......::.::,:::l.....:,:..,'-..;:,'.:,.:.:.:.'.-'::.x.:-,.:, Existing Covenants (Recorded Copy)4 .:..:..::.,.:.:...;.:::..::...::::-.-,.;,,::::::'::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::i::::`?ii:;:!:::i:i;i:`;..?:3i:;?::?:.::..::::i:/:::S.;;::..:;::);:;:!:i:!:-.i:i:::!::C:::?::?.:i::?.;*t`;!: Flood Hazard Data 4 Geotechnical Report 2 NO ,.....,,.......:..---.::..::::-;...:._:.-:.::........::-::.:.::::::.::.::,:.:::.:.x-:.:,:.::!:>:!::::'::-:-¢T:i:i:i:!:i:i:::i:::";!!.:!::!i:!:!-:'ii:j!ii? Grading Plan,Detailed Irregation Plan 4 .-..:::.:::::;::::i::i.:::::::::::::::::::i!>.?::?:i:i.::;`:;:!:i!i:ii::.:::i::i!:::::.:!:i?:``."-'.-:.-,..;::.':;:x:!:::::i:;:i :::!:-::::::'::??.:i- -...............it:{:?:::,.'!?!i;!.;:i ::--:iiii ;i;;::!; Landscape Plan,Conceptual4 ..,....;-:.:,.:;,:.....,:,.;:-,-,,:::,.:::,:...:;:::.--.-..i:;::..'::.-:..i::::]iiii!i!Landscape:.P!:.e.4::::.:ii-:.,.::-..:-:ili.:;;:::ii-:::::;..::ii:!ili::::i :;--:ii i::::.:::;:.::::i !:;i-;!ii::i!iiiiiii!iiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiii!ii!ilii Legal Description 4 List of Sureunding lm.::i.:owri:i;s:i i::ii!::i .....:ii:,:::i:.:::.::ili ..................................................:::!::.::!iii!!:!?.!"!:::.i;:i!::!ii!::i:i!i!::::-i;:ii::i:i::! :::::::::::::!:i:!::i:i:!:!:!:!:::::!:!:!:!:::i:i:i:::i:::i:!-:i:i::!:i;!:!::::i:!:i:i::::::::::::::;.:.;;"-::":3!:::::;:.!i.!: :;:.:ii;.;;i::iif:::i-::;;!::::::-::ii!i !i!iii:i!!;::!i::::i !:ii :::!---:!i:i::i:i!!!i=:,;'.;-'.':::". :::::::::::::::::::::::::::::--::2::::::::::::i:':::::::':i:::::i:;[::':.::::-:-''.-:!;::.':';::,;;•:i:? Mailing Labels for Property Owners 4 I1' IMasterApplicationForm4 Neighborhood Detail Map 4 This requirement may be waived by: 1.Property Services Section 2.Public Works Plan Review Section 3.Building Section 4.Development Planning Section Q:\WEB:WVD EVSERVFo rmsOlaning\waiver.xls PROJECT NAME: DATE:[;--! DEVELOPMENT PLANNINGCITYOFRENTON DEC I 2005 F ECE VE 10/24/2005 € DEVEEOPME!SERVICES DIVIS|ON WAIVERiOFiSUBMIAL;,R EQUIREM ENTS FOR:LANDUSE!TARPEICATIONS This requirement maybe waived by.:,,. 1.Property ServicesSection 2..Public WorksPlan ReviewSection 3.Building Section 4.Development Planning Section ,,,:.,-!.: PROJECT NAME: DATE: Q:\WEBPW EVSERVFormslanningwaiver.xls 10/24/2005 DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DIVISION ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST City of Renton Development Services Division 1055 South Grady Way,Renton,WA 98055 Phone:425-430-7200 Fax:425-430-7231 DEVELOPMENT PLANNINGCITYOFRENTON DEC !4 2005 PURPOSE OF CHECKLIST:RECE ¥ED The State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA),Chapter 43.21C RCW,requires all governmental agencies to consider the environmental impacts of a proposal before making decisions.An Environmental Impact Statement (EIS)must be prepared for all proposals with probable significant adverse impacts on the quality of the environment.The purpose of this checklist is to provide information to help you and the agency identify impacts from your proposal (and to reduce or avoid impacts from the proposal,if it can be done)and to help the agency decide whether an EIS is required. INSTRUCTIONS FOR APPLICANTS: This environmental checklist asks you to describe some basic information about your proposal. Governmental agencies use this checklist to determine whether the environmental impacts of your proposal are significant,requiring preparation of an EIS.Answer the questions briefly,with the most precise information known,or give the best description you can. You must answer each question accurately and carefully,to the best of your knowledge.In most cases, you should be able to answer the questions from your own observations or project plans without the need to hire experts.If you really do not know the answer,or if a question does not apply to your proposal,write "do not know"or "does not apply".Complete answers to the questions now may avoid unnecessary delays later. Some questions ask about governmental regulations,such as zoning,shoreline,and landmark designations.Answer these questions if you can.If you have problems,the governmental agencies can assist you. The checklist questions apply to all parts of your proposal,even if you plan to do them over a period of time or on different parcels of land.Attach any additional information that will help describe your proposal or its environmental effects.The agency to which you submit this checklist may ask you to explain your answers or provide additional information reasonably related to determining if there may be significant adverse impact. USE OF CHECKLIST FOR NONPROJECT PROPOSALS: Complete this checklist for nonproject proposals,even though questions may be answered "does not apply."IN ADDITION,complete the SUPPLEMENTAL SHEET FOR NONPROJECT ACTIONS (part D). For nonproject actions (actions involving decisions on policies,plans and programs),the references in the checklist to the words "project,""applicant,"and "property or site"should be read as "proposal," "proposer,"and "affected geographic area,"respectively. B:\Washington\RENTON\LOWES\Garden Ave N\4Reports\environ\rnlo-envchlst.doc12/14/05 A| 1. o . . . o , . , BACKGROUND Name of proposed project,if applicable: Lowe's of Renton Name of applicant: Lowe's HIW 1530 Faraday Ave,#125 Carlsbad,CA 92008 Address and phone number of applicant and contact person: Paul Manzer,P.E. Steve Pesce PACLAND 11235 SE 6th Street,Suite 220 Bellevue,WA 98004 (425)453-9501 Date checklist prepared: December 12,2005 Agency requesting checklist: City of Renton Development Services Division -Development/Planning Proposed timing or schedule (including phasing,if applicable): Construction Start:June 2008 Project Completion:Winter 2007 Do you have any plans for future additions,expansion,or further activity related to or connected with this proposal?If yes,explain. There are no known plans for future expansion after construction is complete. List any environmental information you know about that has been prepared,or will be prepared, directly related to this proposal. Phase I Environmental Site Assesment Traffic Impact Analysis Environmental Checklist Prepared for Fry's Electronics Geotechnical Report Do you know whether applications are pending for governmental approvals of other proposals directly affecting the property covered by your proposal?If yes,explain. None known. B:\Washington\RENTON\LOWES\Garden Ave N\4Reports\environ\rnlo-envchlst.doc 2 10. 11. List any governmental approvals or permits that will be needed for your proposal,if known. NPDES -WA Department of Ecology Building Permit-City of Renton Short Plat-City of Renton Pubfic Works Construction Permit-City of Renton Electrical Permit-City of Renton Grading Permit-City of Renton Mechanical Permit -City of Renton Plumbing Permit-City of Renton Sign Permit-City of Renton Give brief,complete description of your proposal,including the proposed uses and the size of the project and site. The project would construct an approximate 130,000 SF home improvement retail store with approximately 30,000 SF of outdoor garden center area on the currently paved 9.8 acre site.The proposed development will also include parking lot construction,storm drainage and other utility construction and landscaping improvements per City of Renton requirements. 12. B, 1. Location of the proposal.Give sufficient information for a person to understand the precise location of your proposed project,including a street address,if any,and section,township,and range if known.If a proposal would occur over a range of area,provide the range or boundaries of the site(s).Provide a legal description,site plan,vicinity map,and topographic map,if reasonably available.While you should submit any plans required by the agency,you are not required to duplicate maps or detailed plans submitted with any permit applications related to this checklist. The site is located on the southeast corner of Park Ave N and Garden Ave N and lies north of the Fry's Electronics parking lot and access in Renton,WA. ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS EARTH a.General description of the site (circle onlling,hilly,steep slopes,mountainous, other b.What is the steepest slope on the site (approximate percent slope?) The steepest slope onsite is approximately 2%. c.What general types of soils are found on the site (for example,clay,sand,gravel,peat, muck)?If you know the classification of agricultural soils,specify them and note any prime farmland. The entire site is currently paved.The detailed soil investigation has not been completed at this time,but with the experience in the local area by our geotechnical engineer and his review of other soil investigations for the area,the soils underneath the pavement are expected to consist of the following:5-15 feet B:\Washington\RENTON\LOWES\Garden Ave N\4Reports\environ\rnlo-envchlst.doc 3 d. e. g. h. ° a. medium dense fill material,over approximately 35-50 feet of wetland deposits. These soils have a moderate to high potential for liquefaction during a seismic event,therefore we are proposing pile foundation. Are there surface indications or history of unstable soils in the immediate vicinity?If so, describe. None known. Describe the purpose,type,and approximate quantities of any filling or grading proposed. Indicate source of fill. It is anticipated that the soils will not be suitable for typical spread footings, therefore the proposed building might necessitate being built on a piled foundation.No stripping of topsoil is anticipated due to the existing site condition being mostly paved,but approximately 5000 cubic yards of asphalt will be removed and disposed according to Washington State rules and regulations.Approximately 20,000 cubic yards of on-site soil material will be re-graded to achieve the desired grading.Approximately 10,000 cubic yards of gravel will be imported to construct the sub-base below the proposed building and new parking lot areas.Imported materials will be obtained from an approved and permitted gravel pit. Could erosion occur as a result of clearing,construction,or use?If so,generally describe. The site in its current state is fully paved with asphalt.The construction of the site will utilize this existing condition to the maximum extent possible to control erosion from any of the asphalt removal areas.Generally,the erosion would be kept to a minimum by using BMPs during construction and due to the flat topography of the site.Catch basin protection,construction entrances and street cleaning,if required,are a few of the primary proposed TESC BMPs to be utilized. About what percent of the site will be covered with impervious surfaces after project construction (for example,asphalt or buildings)? Approximately 91%. Proposed measures to reduce or control erosion,or other impacts to the earth,if any: A temporary erosion and sedimentation control plan will be submitted for the City's review and approval with this checklist.Approved erosion mitigation measures will be implemented prior to and during construction.The erosion control plan will include filter fabric fencing,a construction entrance,Temporary Swales and Sediment Ponds and the employment of Best Management Practices during construction.An NPDES permit will be secured prior to construction. AIR What types of emissions to the air would result from the proposal (i.e.,dust,automobile, odors,industrial wood smoke)during construction and when the project is completed?If any,generally describe and give approximate quantities if known. Dust and vehicle emissions may occur during construction.Vehicle emissions from visiting customers will occur after construction. B:\Washington\RENTON\LOWES\Garden Ave N\4Reports\environ\rnlo-envchlst.doc 4 , b.Are there any off-site sources of emission or odor that may affect your proposal?If so, generally describe. None known. c.Proposed measures to reduce or control emissions or other impacts to air,if any: The site will be sprinkled with water as necessary during construction to control dust. WATER a.Surface Water: 1)Is there any surface water body on or in the immediate vicinity of the site (including year- round and seasonal streams,saltwater,lakes,ponds,wetlands)?If yes,describe type and provide names.If appropriate,state what stream or river it flows into. None known. 2)Will the project require any work over,in,or adjacent to (within 200 feet)the described waters?If yes,please describe and attach available plans. No. 3)Estimate the amount of fill and dredge material that would be placed in or removed from surface water or wetlands and indicate the area of the site that would be affected. Indicate the source of fill material. N/A 4)Will the proposal require surface water withdrawals or diversions?Give general description,PurPose,and approximate quantities if known. No. 5)Does the proposal lie within a 100-year flood plain?If so,note location on the site plan. No. 6)Does the proposal involve any discharges of waste materials to surface waters?If so, describe the type of waste and anticipated volume of discharge. No. b.Ground Water: 1)Will ground water be withdrawn,or will water be discharged to ground water?Give general description,purpose,and approximate quantities if known. No. B:\Washington\RENTON\LOWES\Garden Ave N\4Reports\environ\rnlo-envchlst.doc 5 , 2)Describe waste material that will be discharged into the ground from septic tanks or other sources,if any (for example:Domestic sewage;industrial,containing the following chemicals...;agricultural;etc.).Describe the general size of the system,the number of such systems,the number of houses to be served (if applicable),or the number of animals or humans the system(s)are expected to serve. Sanitary sewer flows will be discharged to the City of Renton pubfic sanitary sewer system located within Garden Avenue IV. c.Water Runoff (including storm water): 1)Describe the source of runoff (including storm water)and method of collection and disposal,if any (include quantities,if known).Where will this water flow?Will this water flow into other waters,If so,describe. The onsite stormwater runoff from the paved surfaces will be collected and transported via a system of catch basins and underground storm drainage pipes. The water will then be routed to two separate water quafity compost stormwater filters for water quafity treatment prior to discharging into the existing 72"storm water conveyance pipe located in the Garden Avenue N.The stormwater runoff from the building rooftop is collected and transported at the rear of the building and will bypass the water quafity system and be discharged into the existing 72" storm water conveyance pipe located in Garden Avenue IV. 2)Could waste material enter ground or surface waters?If so,generally describe. No. d.Proposed measures to reduce or control surface,ground,and runoff water impacts,if any: The onsite stormwater runoff from paved areas will be treated for water quafity by the use of a compost stormwater filter.This compost stormwater system will filter sediments and provide biofiltration.No flow control is provided per the requirements of the King County Surface Water Design Manual (KCSWDM)and the City of Renton PLANTS a.Check or circle types of vegetation found on the site: __deciduous tree:alder,maple,aspen,other __evergreen tree:fir,cedar,pine,other shrubs X grass (Minimal) __pasture __crop or grain wet soil plants:cattail,buttercup,bullrush,skunk cabbage,other water plants:water lily,eel grass,milfoil,other other types of vegetation - b.What kind and amount of vegetation will be removed or altered? The majority of the project site is asphalt parking.The proposed development will increase the landscaping on the subject site. B:\Washington\RENTON\LOWES\Garden Ave N\4Reports\environ\rnlo-envchlst.doc 6 . . c.List threatened or endangered species known to be on or near the site. None. d.Proposed landscaping,use of native plants,or other measures to preserve or enhance vegetation on the site,if any: The project site will be landscaped in accordance with the City of Renton requirements.This landscaping includes landscaped buffers along street frontages and interior parking lot landscaping. ANIMALS a.Circle any birds and animals which have been observed on or near the site or are known to be on or near the site: Birds:hawk,heron,eaglsongbirs other Mammals:deer,bear,elk,other Fish:bass,salmon,trout,herring,shellfish,other b.List any threatened or endangered species known to be on or near the site. None. c.Is the site part of a migration route?If so,explain Not known. d.Proposed measures to preserve or enhance wildlife,if any: See item 4.d.above. ENERGY AND NATURAL RESOURCES a.What kinds of energy (electric,natural gas,oil,wood stove,solar)will be used to meet the completed project's energy needs?Describe whether it will be used for heating, manufacturing,etc. Electric and natural gas will be provided for lighting and heat,respectively. b.Would your project affect the potential use of solar energy by adjacent properties?If so, generally describe. No impacts anticipated. c.What kinds of energy conservation features are included in the plans of this proposal? List other proposed measures to reduce or control energy impacts,if any: The project will utilize energy efficient mechanical systems designed in accordance with the Washington State Non-Residential Energy Code. B:\Washington\RENTON\LOWES\Garden Ave N\4Reports\environ\rnlo-envchlst.doc 7 . ° ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH a.Are there any environmental health hazards,including exposure to toxic chemicals,risk of fire and explosion,spill,or hazardous waste,that could occur as a result of this proposal?If so,describe. No. 1 )Describe special emergency services that might be required. N/A . 2)Proposed measures to reduce or control environmental health hazards,if any: In an attempt to control contamination in the event of a spill,55-gallon drums are provided for disposal of potentially hazardous retail materials that become damaged beyond the point that would allow them to be reduced in price and sold,donated to charitable organizations or used "in house."Lowe's attempts to consider each of these options prior to pursuing waste disposal with a designated hazardous waste services company. b.Noise 1)What types of noise exist in the area which may affect your project (for example:traffic, equipment,operation,other)? Traffic noise from nearby roads,freeways and other businesses should not affect the proposed development. 2)What types and levels of noise would be created by or associated with the project on a short-term or a long-term basis (for example:traffic,construction,operation,other)? Indicate what hours noise would come from the site. Short term construction noise will be created during construction.Long term noise from employee vehicles and freight unloading at variable hours. 3)Proposed measures to reduce or control noise impacts,if any: Construction hours will be limited per Renton Municipal Code. LAND AND SHORELINE USE a.What is the current use of the site and adjacent properties? The site is currently an abandoned parking lot.There is a Fry's Electronics to the south,Park Ave N to the North,Garden Ave N and part of the Boeing Corporation to the west and railroad tracks to the east.Beyond the railroad tracks to the east, an industrial use exists. b.Has the site been used for agriculture?If so,describe. Not known. B:\Washington\RENTON\LOWES\Garden Ave N\4Reports\environ\rnlo-envchlst.doc 8 = c.Describe any structures on the site. No structures currently exist. d.Will any structures be demolished?If so,what? None. e.What is the current zoning classification of the site? Urban Center-North 1 (UC-N1) f.What is the current comprehensive plan designation of the site? Urban Center-North g.If applicable,what is the current shoreline master program designation of the site? N/A h.Has any part of the site been classified as an "environmentally sensitive"area?If so, specify. No i.Approximately how many people would reside or work in the completed project? The completed store would employ approximately 200 people. Approximately how many people would the completed project displace? None k.Proposed measures to avoid or reduce displacement impacts,if any: N/A I.Proposed measures to ensure the proposal is compatible with existing and projected land uses and plans,if any: The development will be consistent with current zoning code and comprehensive plan designation. HOUSING a.Approximately how many units would be provided,if any?Indicate whether high,middle, or low-income housing. None. b.Approximately how many units,if any,would be eliminated?Indicate whether high, middle,or low-income housing. None. B:\Washington\RENTON\LOWES\Garden Ave N\4Reports\environ\rnlo-envchlst.doc 9 10. c.Proposed measures to reduce or control housing impacts,if any: N/A AESTHETICS a,What is the tallest height of any proposed structure(s),not including antennas;what is the principal exterior building material(s)proposed. The typical building height is approximately 28'-8"above finished grade.The tallest point at the building entrance exceeds 48'-0".The principal exterior building material is expected to be split-face CMU block (painted). bo What views in the immediate vicinity would be altered or obstructed? The view of the existing parking lot would be replaced with the view of a new retail facility.This development will include landscaping,pedestrian facilities,and other amenities not present on the undeveloped site. C,Proposed measures to reduce or control aesthetic impacts,if any: The project has been designed in accordance with the Urban Center Design Overlay Regulations.This effort has included enhancements to the building architecture, incorporation of pedestrian facilities,landscape bufferplantings,and parking lot landscaping. 11.LIGHT a. b° C° d° AND GLARE What type of light or glare will the proposal produce?What time of day would it mainly occur? The parking lot will be illuminated during evening hours.Light poles and heads will be designed in accordance with the Renton City Code.Vehicle headlights may also produce light and glare during evening hours. Could light or glare from the finished project be a safety hazard or interfere with views? The project lighting will be designed to provide a safe level of lighting within the development. What existing off-site sources of light or glare may affect your proposal? The adjacent roads and retail emit light and glare typical of such systems. Proposed measures to reduce or control light and glare impacts,if any: See item b.above. In addition,light fixtures and pole spacing will be designed to minimize any light encroachment onto adjacent properties per the requirements of the Renton Municipal Code. B:\Washington\RENTON\LOWES\Garden Ave N\4Reports\environ\rnlo-envchlst.doc 10 12. 13. 14. RECREATION a.What designated and informal recreational opportunities are in the immediate vicinity? None. b.Would the proposed project displace any existing recreational uses?If so,describe. No. c.Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts on recreation,including recreation opportunities to be provided by the project or applicant,if any: None. HISTORIC AND CULTURAL PRESERVATION a.Are there any places or objects listed on,or proposed for,national state,or local preservation registers known to be on or next to the site?If so,generally describe. None known b.Generally describe any landmarks or evidence of historic,archaeological,scientific,or cultural importance known to be on or next to the site. None known c.Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts,if any: None TRANSPORTATION a.Identify public streets and highways serving the site,and describe proposed access to the existing street system.Show on site plans,if any. Project access is provided by Garden Ave IV.There is one full access proposed on Garden Ave N and a limited access for delivery trucks from Houser Way. b.Is site currently served by public transit?If not,what is the approximate distance to the nearest transit stop? Yes,King County Metro Transit has a bus stop at the southeast corner of Park Ave N and Garden Ave N c.How many parking spaces would the completed project have?How many would the project eliminate? The completed project will have 428 parking spaces;it will eliminate 1374 existing spots. B:\Washington\RENTON\LOWES\Garden Ave N\4Reports\environ\rnlo-envchlst.doc 11 15. 16. d. e. Will the proposal require any new roads or streets,or improvements to existing roads or streets,not including driveways?If so,generally describe (indicate whether public or private? No new roads are proposed as a part of this development.Frontage landscape improvements are proposed along Garden Ave N.The current access from Houser Way is an entry only.The ingress would be modified to a right-in right-out. Will the project use (or occur in the immediate vicinity of)water,rail,or air transportation? If so,generally describe. Yes.The project is adjacent to the BNSF railway,but is not proposing on utilizing this railroad for any delivery of goods. How many vehicular trips per day would be generated by the completed project?If known,indicate when peak volumes would occur. The proposed development site is estimated to generate 3,805 net new weekday daily trips.Approximately 315 trips (145 inbound,170 outbound)will occur during the weekday p.m.peak hour.See the Preliminary Traffic Assessment by Kittleson & Associates,Inc.dated December 14,2005. Proposed measures to reduce or control transportation impacts,if any: The future impacts to the study intersections as noted in the Preliminary Traffic Assessment by Kittelson &Associates,Inc.dated December 14,2005,will be analyzed during the Traffic Impact Analysis (T/A)to be completed January 2006. PUBLIC SERVICES a.Would the project result in an increased need for public services (for example: protection,police protection,health care,schools,other)?If so,generally describe. The project will require police and fire department protection. b.Proposed measures to reduce or control direct impacts on public services,if any. Site will be illuminated to reduce the possibility of theft and vandalism. UTILITIES a. fire lable at the sit "a ,wate refuse service, eptic system,othe.':"----' B:\Washington\RENTON\LOWES\Garden Ave N\4Reports\environ\rnlo-envchlst.doc 12 b b.Describe the utilities that are proposed for the project,the utility providing the service,and the general construction activities on the site or in the immediate vicinity which might be needed. •Water (12"dia.pipe)-City of Renton •Sanitary Sewer (6"side sewer with 4"Force Main pipe)-City of Renton •Gas -Puget Sound Energy •Power-Puget Sound Energy •Cable TV-Comcast •Telephone-Qwest Communications •Refuse Service -Waste Management Northwest •Storm Drainage-City of Renton stormwater system C=SIGNATURE I,the undersigned,state that to the best of my knowledge the above information is true and complete.It is understood that the lead agency may withdraw any declaration of non-significance that it might issue in reliance upon this checklist should there be any willful misrepresentation or willful lack of full dure on my part. ra°nriiied:('-Z),-Ae,e--z,,_,V- Oate: B:\Washington\RENTON\LOWES\Garden Ave N\4Reports\environ\rnlo-envchlst.doc 13 t Urban Center Design Overlay District Report Proposed Retail Lowe's ofRenton Park Ave N &Garden Ave N Renton,Washington DEVELOPMENT PLANNINGCITYOFRENTON DEC 1 4 2005 RECEIVED This project has been designed to meet the requirements of the Urban Center -North guidelines as follows: Pedestrian Building entries -The building entries face the parking lot.On site sidewalks will connect to the city sidewalks along Garden Ave N near the site entrance enabling pedestrians to easily access the building entries. Transition to surrounding development -The adjacent retail site (Fry's Electronics)has been taken into consideration for an easy transition to the Lowe's site.The building entry is oriented towards the parking area and faces the neighboring retail store,Fry's Electronics.Truck access for the site will occur at the rear of the building from a separate entrance to further separate pedestrian and car traffic. Parking design -The parking lot for this project has been designed to the standards set forth in the code.The parking area is access fro the shared entry with Fry's Electronics and is similar in circulation and design.The building is easily accessible from the handicapped parking in the front of the lot and the parking lot is screened from the surrounding roadways.Also,shields on parking lot light poles will be used to ensure that no glare is produced from the parking lot at night. Vehicular access -There will be one access point for the retail area from the public right of way on Garden Ave N.This will reduce pedestrian obstruction.Furthermore,truck access is proposed at the northeastern comer ofthe site from Houser Way,which reduces the car and pedestrian interaction with truck traffic. Pedestrian Circulation -The parking aisles are oriented perpendicular to the building fagade so the building is easily accessible after a person has parked.Also,on-site sidewalks will be connected to the sidewalk along Garden Ave N to enable pedestrians to easily access the site. Common space -Since the site contains no residential area,there is no common space on site. Landscaping -The site and parking lot will be landscaped to meet the requirements of the City ofRenton Code.The landscape plan's intent is to provide visual relief in large parking areas and to provide screening from surrounding areas.The landscaping also provides easy visual cues of vehicle circulations and parking lot.Street trees are provided to help provide screening of the propose development and beautify the street frontage. Landscaping will be irrigated to facilitate the growth and health of the plants. .l Building character and massing,rooflines and materials -The design of the building will be such that it enhances the neighborhood and blends well with surrounding developments.The design is typical of Lowe's HIW on the west coast and has the general Lowe's HIW features and colors.The choices are included within the submittal package.Building material color and texture variations will be used to break up the long building faces.The building roof lines provides the distinctive look of the Lowe's HIW along with pronounced raised entry ways as shown on the building elevations. PROJECT NARRATIVE Proposed Retail Lowe's of Renton Park A ve N &Garden A ve N Renton,Washington DEVELOPMENT PLANNINGCITYOFRENTON DEC I 2005 RECERVED Project Description This project proposes to construct a new retail store located at the southeast corner of Park Avenue North and Garden Avenue North,in Renton,Washington.As discussed below,this project proposal includes the construction of a one-story building of approximately 128,277 square feet,a garden center of approximately 29,712 square feet,and associated infrastructure,such as parking, landscaping,water,sewer,and stormwater facilities.Approximately 428 stalls are proposed. Permits This project will require the following permits for approval:State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA), Washington State Department of Ecology for NPDES Permits,Site Plan Approval,Building Permit, Utility Permit,Right-of-Way Permit,Sign Permit and Grading Permit. Zoning and Setbacks The existing site is currently unoccupied.Boeing previously occupied the site as a satellite parking area for employees.The site is completely paved with typical parking lot improvements such as lighting and drainage structures.We understand that the site is currently zoned Urban Center -North 1 (UC-N1)which allows the proposed retail use.In addition,we understand UC-N1 zoning requires front yard and building setbacks,which have been met (see attached site plan).The property to the east,west and south are also zoned UC-N1.The property north of Park Ave N is zoned Urban Center -North 2. Landscaping In its present state,the project site contains no perimeter or interior landscaping.The project site will be landscaped in accordance with City of Renton requirements.This landscaping includes landscaped buffers along street frontages and interior parking lot landscaping.Parking landscaping is also provided along the eastern edge of parking. Site Access The site currently has two full driveway access from Garden Ave N and one driveway access at the northeastern corner of the site from Houser Way.Of the two full accesses along Garden Ave N,the northern access will be removed by this development and all customer access will occur at the joint access with Fry's Electronics.The access to the northeastern corner will be proposed as a limited, right-in right-out access point for delivery trucks only.There is also a required fire lane between the building and the railroad tracks along the eastern side of the building that would be for fire access only. Off-site Improvements Landscaping would be added along Garden Ave N between the building and the existing sidewalk. Proposed Retail Renton,Washington December 13,2005 Soils It is anticipated that the soils will not be suitable for typical spread footings,therefore the proposed building might necessitate being built on a piled foundation.No stripping of topsoil is anticipated due to the existing site condition being mostly paved,but approximately 5000 cubic yards of asphalt will be removed and disposed according to Washington State rules and regulations.Approximately 20,000 cubic yards of on-site soil material will be re-graded to achieve the desired grading. Approximately 10,000 cubic yards of gravel will be imported to construct the sub-base below the proposed building and new parking lot areas.Imported materials will be obtained from an approved and permitted gravel pit. Stormwater Stormwater runoff from the subject site currently drains to existing catch basins on the western side of the site which ultimately discharges without known treatment to the public storm system in Garden Ave N.The stormwater management system for the proposed development will be designed and constructed in accordance with the current City of Renton Development Standards (King County 1990).The system will mainly consist of three areas;the front (south)parking area,the building rooftop,and the rear (north)parking area.The onsite stormwater runoff from the paved surfaces,both in the front and rear parking areas,will be collected by catch basins.The runoff will then be transported to two separate underground compost stormwater filters prior to discharging into the existing 72"stormwater conveyance pipe located in Garden Ave N.The rooftop runoff will be collected at the rear of the buildings and transported to the existing 72"stormwater pipe.This clean rooftop stormwater runoff will be bypassed around the water quality system. Utility Infrastructure The existing site is served by public water and sewer through the City of Renton.These services would be extended and relocated as necessary on-site to facilitate the new proposed store. Construction Costs Total construction which includes sitework,utilities,and pavement and building costs are estimated to be approximately $6.6 million. Environmental The site is entirely paved and no wetlands or environmentally sensitive areas were encountered on the site.There are no trees on the site,therefore no tree cutting list will be included with the submittal. Proposed Retail Renton,Washington December 13,200.5 Construction Mitigation Narrative Lowe's of Renton Park Ave N and Garden Ave N Renton,Washington DEVELOPMENT PLANNINGCITYOFRENTON DEC I 20I : gGE VED Project Description The property proposes a new Lowe's Home Improvement at the southeast corner of the intersection of Park Avenue North and Garden Avenue North,in the City of Renton,Washington commencing in June 2006 and finishing in winter 2007.This project proposes to construct a one story building with an approximately 128,277 square foot retail store and a 29,712 square foot garden center with its associated paving,utilities,storm drainage and landscaping improvements on this 9.8-acre site. The retail store proposes to be open from 6 AM -10 PM Monday through Saturday and 8 AM -8PM on Sunday.These hours will facilitate store operation and delivery access times.Construction hours shall meet City of Renton's requirements and adopted noise standards. Construction Measures A haul road and construction entrance will be proposed as part of the civil engineering documents for construction.These temporary erosion control measures will be required to be implemented and maintained by the contractor during construction.In addition,the contractor will be responsible to provide the City with their off-site hauling and transportation routes and preliminary traffic control plan,if needed. As mentioned above,a temporary erosion control plan will be part of the civil engineering documents for construction.Such measures include,but are not limited to:haul roads,construction entrance, staging area,silt fencing,temporary interceptor swale,temporary sedimentation pond and catch basin inlet protection.Dust on this site will most likely be caused by trucks,grading activities,stockpiles and wind.This is generally controlled by the use of water trucks or sprinklers.Street sweepers and washing of wheels may be used to control mud/dirt from adjacent streets. Lowe's of Renton Renton,Washington December 13,2005 11235 S.E.6TH STREET T 425.'501 SUITE 220 F 425.45.8208 BELLEVUE,WA 9800,WWW.PACLAND.COM , LANDSCAPE ANALYSIS,LOT COVERAGE,AND PARKING ANALYSIS Tota!area of site = Total area of building footprint = Total area of garden center footprint = Sq.Ft. 426,333 128,289 29,712 Acres 9.79 2.95 0.68 Total impervious (existing)= Total impervious iproposed)=.... ;Sq.Ft. i,425,415i388,987 Acres 9.77 8.93 Main building floor area = Garden center floor area = Sq.Ft.Acres 128,289 2.95 29,712 0.68 Percentage of site covered by buildings or structures =37.1% Number of parking spaces required by City code -512 stalls MAXIMUM Parking stalls provided: Type of stall Dimension Number of stalls Compact 9'x 18' Standard 9'x 20'Contractor ;10'.................X 20'ADA accessible i 8'x18' 0 394 24 10 *Note:ADA stalls are adjacent to a 5'wide loading area ADA van stalls are adjacent to an 8'wide loading area Area of parking lot landscaping: Sq.Ft. Perimeter i 3,671 jinterior "i "11,880 Acres 0.08 0.27 DEVELOPMENT PLANNINGCITYOFRENTON DEC i 4 2005 RECEIVED I Lowe's of Renton Renton,Washington December 14,2005 DEVELOPMENT PLANNING CITY OF RENTON DEC I 2005 C" ,) J o HIUON OUA]O8 i.,.8z NOI DNIHSVM .5)'ffq HIUON x IllZoN co HJ.UON HIUON H±UON LEGEND SPECIAL FLOOD HAZARD AREAS tNUNDAIED BY lOll-YEAR FLOOD ZONE A N.I)ase fl..d t.h,,ati.n.,delermi:md. ZONE AE Base Ihud eh,ath:n deh-mlinl,d. ZONE AH Fh,od dPi)lh.+,ill I Ii,3 (eel lut.tiallx are.n. +)I |)}ix|ing+;J),la.,lJ,+<+d 'Ii.,'.,irilpns dvtermined. ZONE AO Fh.+d del)tlr.,+,I I It)3 feet tthuall'+sheet flow (m sl(>l)iu+g lPrraim;a+,rago depth dPternined.[lr areds of aJlHvi,ll (,m [hJtuling, vehilie,also deternlined. ZONE A97 T.he pri+leiled fr¢+m I(It)-yvar flo,gl by Federal fl(u,d pr()lectirm system +ln(h,r u)ntruc'tion:no hast?ele%alion delPrmint,d, ZONE V (;,hlstal 11,o(I wilh "eelocitv hazard wa.{, a<rir,nI:no h,ls('P+Io(|ele;ations deteriTfinc,d. ZONE VE C,mstal flOud with yah,city hazard !wave a<.litlnl:ba.,e ((.)Od ele'¢ali=Jns detern'dned. FLOODWAY AREAS IN ZONE AE OTHER FLOOD AREAS ZONE X Areas of 500-1,ear 11*oCl;areas q,l ItI0-'¢ear ilo+,d with average dupths uf less Ihan I foot or with drainage areas less than I square mile:,mrl areas protected by k,vet,s from t00-year fI{L OTHER AREAS ZONE X Areas determined to he outside S()0-year floodplain. ZONE D Areas in which flood hazards are undetermined. UNDEVELOPED COASTAL BARRIERS t(::?:::l +Identified IdenIi¢ied Otherwise 1983 1990 Protecled Areas Coastal barrier areas are normally located vdthin or adjacent to Special Flood Hazard Areas. Flood Boundary ....Floodway Boundary .....Zone D Boundary Boundary Dividing Special Flood Hazard Zones.and Boundary Dividing Areas of Different Coastal Base Flood Elevations Within Special Flood Hazard Zones. Base Flood Elevation Line: 'v')7"v''Elevation in Feet.See Map Index for Elevation Datum. @ @ Cross Section Line Base Flood Elevation in Feet(EL 987)Where Uniform Within Zone. RM7 See Map Index for Elevation Datum. X Elevation Reference Mark •M2 River Mile Horizontal Coordinates Based on North97007'30",32022'30"American Datum of 1927 (NAD 27) Projection. NOTES This map is for use in administering the National Flood Insurance Program: it does not necessarily identify all areas subject to [Iooding.particularly from small size,or aJl planimetric features outside r APPROXIMATE SCALE IN FEET 50O 0 500 NATIONAL FLOOD INSURANCE PROGRAM FIRM FLOOD INSURANCE RATE MAP KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON AND INCORPORATED AREAS PANEL 977 OF 1725 (SEE MAP INDEX FOR PANELS NOT PRINTED) CONTAINS: COMMUNFFY NUMBER PANEL SUFFIX KING COUNTY.U/41NCORPORATED ,REAS 530071 0977 F RENTON.CITY OF 530088 0977 F MAP NUMBER 53033C0977 F MAP REVISED: MAY 16,1995 Federal Emergency Management Agency i" This is an official copy of a portion ofthe above referenced flood map.It was extracted using F-MIT On-Une.This map does not reflect changes or amendments which may have been made subsequent to the date on the title block.For the latest product information about National Flood Insurance Program llood maps check the FEMA Flood Map Store at www.mec.fema.gov KITTELSON &ASSOCIATES,INC.P=CI/ TRANSPORTATION PLANNING/TRAFFIC ENGINEERING 610 SW ALDER,SUITE700 •PORTLAND,OR97205 •(503)228-5230 •FAX (503)273-816g MEMORANDUM Date: To: From: ee" Project: Subject: December 14,2005 Jan Illian,City of Renton Jerilyn Wen and Marc Butorac,P.E. Jim Manion,Lowe's HIW,Inc. Steve Pesce,PacLand Paul Manzer,PacLand Bill Fortunato,PacLand Anthony Yi,Kittelson &Associates,Inc. Renton Lowe's Preliminary Traffic Assessment Project #:7662.01 This memorandum summarizes the scope of work items associated with conducting a transportation impact analysis (TIA)for the proposed Renton Lowe's project as discussed at the October 20,2005 Pre-Application Conference.In addition,the existing traffic operations at the identified study intersections are also provided. Proposed Development Plan Lowe's is proposing to develop a home improvement store on a plot of land located in the southeast quadrant of the Park Avenue/Garden Avenue intersection as illustrated in Figure 1. The site is currently vacant and is located adjacent to an existing Fry's Electronics store.The proposed development plan calls for constructing a new Lowe's building on the north end of the site with a parking field located on the south side of the building. The proposed site plan includes the development of a Lowe's home improvement store with a 128,277 square-foot showroom/warehouse and a 29,712 square-foot garden center.Access to the site is proposed via a shared driveway on Garden Avenue with the existing Fry's Electronics. Figure 2 illustrates the proposed site plan and access location. FILENAME:H:\projfile\7662-Renton Lowe's',xeportXcoping\7662 SOW_Dec05.doc Renton Lowe's December2005 (NSCALE) SITE VICINITY MAP RENTON,WASHINGTON KI'I-rELSON &ASSOCIATES,INC. TRANSPORTATION PLANNING /TRAFFIC ENGINEERING RennLowe o/ \ /s //" \ / \ \'\ \ '\ \ sca NG \ \ \\ \\ \ \ \ J J \\ J J December2005 (NO SCALE \\\ PROPOSED srrE PLAN RENTON,WASHINGTON KITTELSON &ASSOCIATES,INC. TRANSPORTATION PLANNING/TRAFFIC ENGINEERING Renton Lowe 's December 14,2005 Project#:7662.01 Page 4 Analysis Year To adequately assess the impacts of the proposed development,several study periods will be addressed for the project.Based on discussions with the project team,complete development is expected to occur in 2007.Given this time frame,the traffic study will evaluate year 2005 existing conditions,year 2007 background conditions (includes traffic conditions under expected regional traffic growth without site development),and year 2007 full build-out conditions (includes the background conditions as well as the expected traffic from the proposed Lowe's and other in-process developments in the site vicinity). Study Intersections The following study intersections were identified by city staff at the October 20,2005 pre- application meeting for analysis: ®Park Avenue/Lake Washington Boulevard-Garden Avenue ®8th Street/Garden Avenue •Garden Avenue/Proposed Driveway (Fry's Electronics) Design Hour Within each of the identified analysis years,specific emphasis will be placed on those time periods that experience the highest degree of adjacent roadway travel.Based on information provided by Lowe's,peak retail activity,which includes employees and customers,occurs during the weekday p.m.peak hours.Based on this information,an average weekday p.m.peak hour historically represents a "reasonable worst case"study time period in terms of traffic levels on the surrounding transportation network. Growth Rate To account for regional and local traffic growth within the site vicinity,a growth rate will be applied to existing traffic volumes to estimate future year 2007 traffic volumes.The growth rate will be developed from the model volumes used in the Boeing Renton Comprehensive Plan Amendment EIS (prepared by Transportation Engineering NorthWest,LLC,June 30,2003). Trip Generation Estimates of weekday daily and weekday p.m.peak hour vehicle trip ends for the proposed development were calculated from empirical observations at other similar developments.These observations were obtained from the standard reference manual,Trip Generation,7th Edition, published by the Institute of Transportation Engineers (1). Kittelson &Associates,Inc.Portland,Oregon Renton Lowe's Project #."7662.O1 December 14,2005 Page 5 A percentage of trips generated by these land uses can be classified as pass-by trips (trips currently on the adjacent roadways that would be drawn to the new development)as well as internal trips (trips generated to the other retail uses within the development that result in one joint trip to the site).To quantify the impact of these pass-by and intemal trips,reduction factors for these land uses were obtained from the Trip Generation Handbook (2).The Trip Generation Handbook identifies an internal trip rate of 20 percent from retail to retail land uses.However, for a conservative approach,a five percent intemalization rate was deemed appropriate for this development to account for trips between Lowe's and the Fry's Electronic store. In addition to the internalization rate,the Trip Generation Handbook also identifies an average pass-by rate of 48 percent for home improvement stores during the weekday p.m.peak hour. However,given the limited number of samples (three),and the existing traffic volumes on Garden Avenue,a pass-by rate of 15 percent was assumed for the proposed home improvement store. Table 1 summarizes the estimated site trip generation during a typical weekday as well as during the weekday p.m.peak hour.(All trip ends shown in Table 1 have been rounded to the nearest five trips). Table 1 Estimated Trip Generation ITE Size Land Use Code (sq.ft.) Home Improvement Superstore 862 internal Trips (5%) Pass-by Trips(15%) Net New Tdps Daily Trips 157,989 4,710 ,.,,,(670) 3,805 Weekday PM Peak Hour Trips Total In Out 385 180 205 (20)(1(3)(1O) (50)(25)(25) 315 145 170 As shown in Table 1,the proposed development site is estimated to generate 3,805 net new weekday daily trips.Approximately 315 trips (145 inbound,170 outbound)will occur during the weekday p.m.peak hour. Trip Distribution and Assignment The distribution of site-generated trips onto the study area roadway system was estimated based on a review of the existing transportation facilities,existing peak hour directional travel characteristics,and surrounding development patterns.Figure 3 depicts the estimated trip distribution pattern for the proposed development. Based on the trip distribution estimate,Figure 3 also illustrates the projected site-generated traffic volumes at the study intersections during the average weekday p.m.peak hour. Kittelson &Associates,Inc.Portland,Oregon / Renton Lowe's December 2005 B (NO SCALE) FRY'S ELECTRONICS 45°/o N 8TH ST 5% ESTIMATED TRIP DISTRIBUTION AND SITE-GENERATED TRIPSWEEKDAYPMPEAKHOURRENTON,WASHINGTON KI'n'ELSON &ASSOCIATES,INC. TRANSPORTATION PLANNING /TRAFFIC ENGINEERING Renton Lowe 's December 14,2005 Project#:7662.01 Page 7 We trust this memorandum provides adequate documentation of the proposed development plan, estimated trip generation,and study intersections for inclusion in the Renton Lowe's transportation impact analysis.In addition,we formally request that the City of Renton provide written confirmation regarding the proposed project assumptions and methodology as soon as possible so that we can proceed with our analysis.If you have any questions,please give us a call at (503)228-5230. References: 1.Institute of Transportation Engineers.Trip Generation,7th Edition.2003. 2.Institute of Transportation Engineers.Trip Generation Handbook,2nd Edition.2004. Kittelson &Associates,Inc.Portland,Oregon GEOENGINEERS 8410 154m Avenue NE,Redmond,WA 98052,TELEPHONE:(425)861-6000,FAX:(425)861-6050 MEMORANDUM www.geoengineers.com TO:Paul Manzer &Steve Pesce -PacLand DEVELOPMENT PLANNINGFROM:Shaun Stauffer &David Cook CITY OF RENTON DATE:December ]2,2005 DEC I 2{}05 FILE:8335-003-00 and 8335-003-01 (VD SUBJECT:Master Site Plan Approval and Site Plan Review Application Lowe's of Renton Project 800 Garden Avenue North Renton,Washington INTRODUCTION This memorandum provides information for use as part of the Master Site Plan Approval and Site Plan Review application for the planned Lowe's of Renton project in Renton,Washington.The site is located at 800 Garden Avenue North.The site is currently developed with a Fry's Electronic Store in the southern half ofthe site and asphalt parking in the northern half.The Lowe's of Renton project is planned to be constructed in the northern half of the site. The current development plans consist of construction of a 128,277 square-foot sales warehouse building and a 29,676 square-foot garden center (157,953 square feet total)at the site.Load information for the structures has not been finalized;however,column loads for this structure type are typically 100 kips,wall loads are typically 6 kips per foot and floor slab loads are typically 300 psf (pounds per square foot).Truck delivery and staging areas will be located on the north side of the sales building while customer parking will be located on the south side ofthe sales building. Site plan applications have been submitted to the City of Renton under permit numbers LUA01-052 and LUA03-100.The information submitted as part of these applications was reviewed in preparing this memorandum.GeoEngineers is also currently completing a Phase I ESA (environmental site assessment)and a geotechnical engineering study specific to the Lowe's of Renton project.These results of these studies will be completed in January,2006. APPLICATION REQUIREMENTS WETLAND ASSESSMENT Based on a preliminary site visit and our initial Phase I ESA work for projects in the site vicinity,it is our preliminary opinion that wetlands are not present at or within 100 feet of the project site.A wetland determination will be completed as part of our environmental services to confirm (or modify)the above opinion. STANDARD STREAM OR LAKE STUDY Based on a preliminary site visit,a review of City of Renton sensitive areas maps,and environmental services completed recently in the site vicinity,we conclude that the project site is located outside of the 100-year DISCLAIMER:Any electronic form,facsimile or hard copy of the original document (email,text,table,and/or figure),if provided,and any attachments are only a copy of the original document.The original document is stored by GeoEngineers,Inc.and will serve as the official document of record. 4 Memorandum to [Click here,tye_name] [Click here,type date] Page 2 floodplain and does not contain any unclassified streams.We plan on reviewing FEMA flood plain maps and USGS topographic maps as part of our environmental studies for the project to validate this opinion. HABITAT DATA REPORT In our opinion,it is unlikely that the site contains or abuts critical habitat.This opinion is based on our past investigations in the site area and a preliminary site visit.Our environmental services for the project will include an endangered species and protected flora/fauna evaluation to validate this opinion. GEOTECHNICAL REPORT As part 0 of our preparation for work at this site,GeoEngineers collected and reviewed the following: Geotechnical Engineering Design Report completed by GeoEngineers for the Stoneway Concrete batch plant directly east of the site (adjacent to the BNSF railroad tracks).This proj ect includes seven borings and eight test pits. Records of five borings recently completed by GeoEngineers for an 8-acre residential development directly west of the site (west of Garden Avenue North). Record of one boring completed by GeoEngineers for a light pole at the site. •Geotechnical Investigation Report completed by Kleinfelder for the Fry's Electronic Store on the south half ofthe project.The report includes twenty borings. Based on our review of these explorations,the subsurface soils are expected to consist of 5 to 15 feet of medium dense to dense fill overlying native soils.The fill generally consists of sand and gravel with variable silt content;however,at the Stoneway Concrete site the fill contained layers of loose coal tailings.The native soils below the fill are expected to consist of alluvial and wetland deposits of variable thickness.The alluvial deposits are typically loose to medium dense granular soils and have a moderate to high potential for liquefaction during a seismic event.The wetland deposits typically consist of soft peat and organic silt and are highly compressible.The bottom of these soils is expected to be on the order of 40 to 60 feet below the existing ground surface.Dense to very dense (potentially glacially consolidated)soils are anticipated below the alluvial and wetland deposits.Groundwater is expected to be within 5 to 10 feet of the existing ground surface. In our opinion,design and construction of the Lowe's of Renton project is geotechnically feasible.We are currently in the process of completing borings and CPT (cone penetration test)probes to evaluate the subsurface conditions specific for the Lowe's of Renton site.Based on nearby explorations,the key geotechnical issues that will need to be considered for this project are as follows: •Potentially liquefiable alluvial soils are expected at the site.The design of the building will need to take into account the potential liquefaction induced settlements,if necessary.Options include supporting the structure on deep foundations or completing ground improvement (stone columns or aggregate piers).Ground improvement may not be feasible,depending on the thickness and lateral extent of wetland deposits at the site. •The presence of highly compressible wetland deposits may limit the use of shallow foundation support for the structure and ground improvement installations.Utility installations will also need to account for the presence of these soils to limit differential settlements between utilities and the building. Memorandum to [Click here,tyi- [Click here,type date] Page 3 ,lame] ! J •Foundation and floor slab support will likely consist of deep foundations (driven or drilled piles)that extend below the potentially liquefiable alluvial soils and highly compressible wetland soils.Shallow foundations may be feasible provided that they bear on improved ground (stone columns or aggregate piers). ®Foundation installation will need to take into account the location of the 72-inch storm drain pipe along Garden Avenue North.Vibration monitoring may be necessary if driven piles are installed or ground improvement is considered. ®The site is relatively level;therefore,slope stability will not be a geotechnical concern for this site. •Retaining walls for the project will be limited to dock high walls for the building structure. Foundation support for the retaining walls will need to be incorporated into the design of the structure. ®The on-site soils will have a low to moderate potential for erosion if exposed during construction. Appropriate BMPs will need to be included in the erosion and sedimentation control plan to effectively control erosion and sedimentation at the site. "'4 Form WA-5 (6/76) Commitment Face Page File No.:NCS-171106-SA1 COMMITMENT FOR TITLE INSURANCE Issued by FIRSTAMERICAN TITLEINSURANCE COMPANY DEVELOPMENT PLANNINGCITYOFRENTON DEC I It 2005 RECEgVED First American Title Insurance Company,herein called the Company,for valuable consideration,hereby commits to issue its policy or policies of title insurance,as identified in Schedule A,in favor of the proposed Insured named in Schedule A,as owner or mortgagor of the estate or interest covered hereby in the land described or referred to in Schedule A,upon payment of the premiums and charges therefor;all subject to the provisions of Schedules A and B and to the Conditions and Stipulations hereof. This Commitment shall be effective only when the identity of the proposed Insured and the amount of the policy or policies committed for have been inserted in Schedule A hereof by the Company,either at the time of the issuance of the Commitment or by subsequent endorsement. This Commitment if preliminary to the issuance of such policy or policies of title insurance and all liability and obligations hereunder shall cease and terminate six (6)months after the effective date hereof or when the policy or policies committed for shall issue,whichever first occurs,provided that the failure to issue such policy or policies is not the fault of the Company.This Commitment shall not be valid or binding until countersigned by an authorized officer or agent. IN WITNESS WHEREOF,the Company has caused this commitment to be signed and sealed,to become valid when countersigned by an authorized officer or agent of the Company,all in accordance with its By-Laws.This Commitment is effective as of the date shown in Schedule A as "Effective Date." FirstAmerican 77tie Insurance Company By:President Attest:'X,1_Secretary By:Countersigned FirstAmerican 77Ue Insurance Company Form WA-5 (6/76) Commitment File No.:NCS-171106-SA1 Page No.1 First American Title Insurance Company National Commercial Services 5 First American Way,Santa Ana,CA 92707 (714)800-3000 -FAX Kristen Hueter (714)250-8358 kh ueter@firstam.com Bernardo Bu (714)250-8353 bbu@firstam.com To: ° 2. Jones,Waldo,Holbrook,&McDonough 170 S Main Street,Suite 1500 Salt Lake City,UT 84101 Attn:Cheryl Gallo SECOND REPORT SCHEDULE A Commitment Date:September 25,2005 at 7:30 A.M. Policy or Policies to be issued: File No,:NCS-171106-SA1 Your Ref No.: AMOUNT PREMIUM TAX , ° $8,537,760.00 $$ Proposed Insured: Lowes HIW,Inc. $o.oo $$ Proposed Insured: The estate or interest in the land described on Page 2 herein is Fee Simple,and title thereto is at the effective date hereof vested in: DASH-80,L.P.who acquired as DASH 80,L P,a Washington limited partnership The land referred to in this Commitment is described as follows: The land referred to in this report is described in Exhibit attached hereto. FirstAmerican Title Insurance Company Form WA-5 (6/76) Commitment File No.:NCS-171106-SAI Page No.2 EXHIBIT 'A' LEGAL DESCRIPTION: That portion of the Northwest 1/4 and the Northeast 1/4 of Section 8,Township 23 North,Range 5 East W M, described as follows: Beginning at the intersection of the South line of said Northwest 1/4 with the Easterly margin of Garden Street as conveyed to the City of Renton by Deed recorded under Recording No.5535459, Thence South 89o28'22''East along said South line 603.26 feet to a monument in case held as the center of said section,thence South 89°30'10''East 35.59 feet to a point on the Westerly margin of the Pacific Coast R R Co right-of way,said point being upon a curve to the right,from which the center bears North 52o20'38''East, 810.39 feet,Thence Northerly along said margin an arc length of 277.62 feet to the point of tangency,Thence North 18o01'40''West along said Westerly margin 1,995.11 feet to an intersection with the Southerly margin of the Washington State Highway (PSH-1)North Renton Interchange A-line right-of way, Thence South 49o05'06''West along said Southerly margin 406.82 feet,Thence South 31o53'55''West along said Southerly margin 62.78 feet, Thence South 08°39'15''East 47.07 feet, Thence South 18o00'30''East along said Easterly margin 1,289.97 feet to the point of curvature of a curve to the right with a radius of 910.00 feet, Thence along said margin curving to the right,an arc length of 293.83 feet to the point of tangency, Thence South 00°29'31 ''West along said Easterly margin 253.42 feet to the True Point of Beginning. Situate in the City of Renton,County of King,State of Washington. FirstAmerican Title Insurance Company Form WA-5 (6/76) Commitment File No.:NCS-171106-SAI Page No.3 SCHEDULE B -SECTION 1 REQUIREMENTS The following are the Requirements to be complied with: Item (A)Payment to or for the account of the Grantors or Mortgagors of the full consideration for the estate or interest to be insured. Item (B)Proper instrument(s)creating the estate or interest to be insured must be executed and duly filed for record. Item (C)Pay us the premiums,fees and charges for the policy. Item (D)You must tell us in writing the name of anyone not referred to in this Commitment who will get an interest in the land or who will make a loan on the land.We may then make additional requirements or exceptions SCHEDULE B -SECTION 2 GENERAL EXCEPTIONS The Policy or Policies to be issued will contain Exceptions to the following unless the same are disposed of to the satisfaction of the Company. A°Taxes or assessments which are not shown as existing liens by the records of any taxing authority that levies taxes or assessments on real property or by the public records. B,Any facts,rights,interest,or claims which are not shown by the public records but which could be ascertained by an inspection of said land or by making inquiry of person in possession thereof. C.Easements,claims of easement or encumbrances which are not shown by the public records. D°Discrepancies,conflicts in boundary lines,shortage in area,encroachments,or any other facts which a correct survey would disclose,and which are not shown by public records. E.(1)Unpatented mining claims;(2)reservations or exceptions in patents or in acts authorizing the issuance thereof;(3)Water rights,claims or title to water;whether or not the matters excepted under (1),(2)or (3)are shown by the public records;(4)Indian Tribal Codes or Regulations, Indian Treaty or Aboriginal Rights,including easements or equitable servitudes. F,Any lien,or right to a lien,for services,labor,materials or medical assistance theretofore or hereafter furnished,imposed by law and not shown by the public records. G.Any service,installation,connection,maintenance,construction,tap or reimbursement charges/costs for sewer,water,garbage or electricity. H,Defects,liens,encumbrances,adverse claims or other matters,if any,created,first appearing in the public records or attaching subsequent to the effective date hereof but prior to the date the proposed insured acquires of record for value the estate or interest or mortgages thereon covered by this Commitment. FirstAmerican Title Insurance Company Form WA-5 (6/76) Commitment SCHEDULE B-SECTION 2 (continued) SPECIAL EXCEPTIONS File No.:NCS-171106-SA1 Page No.4. i, , . Lien of the Real Estate Excise Sales Tax and Surcharge upon any sale of said premises,if unpaid.As of the date herein,the excise tax rate for the City of Renton is at 1.78%. Levy/Area Code:2100 General Taxes for the year 2005. Tax Account No.:082305-9217-00 Amount Billed:$193,681.03 Amount Paid:$96,840.52 Amount Due:$96,840.51 Assessed Land Value:$11,170,500.00 Assessed Improvement Value:$5,150,100.00 Condemnation in King County Superior Court by the State of Washington,of rights of access to state highway and of light,view and air by decree entered Cause No.656127. . , , , Relinquishment of all existing and future rights to light,view and air,together with the rights of access to and from the State Highway constructed on lands conveyed by document in favor of the State of Washington: Recorded:July 15,1966 Recording No.:6078423 Said instrument is a re-record of recording no(s).6065436. Easement,including terms and provisions contained therein: Recording Information:September 23,1988 under Recording No.8809230146 In Favor of:City of Renton For:Public utilities Affects:West 20 feet Easement,including terms and provisions contained therein: Recording Information:July 13,1992 under Recording No.9207130661 In Favor of:Puget Sound Power &Light Company For:Electric transmission and/or distribution system Affects:As described therein Easement,including terms and provisions contained therein: Recording Information:February 3,1994 under Recording No.9402030482 In Favor of:Puget Sound Power &Light Company For:Electric transmission and/or distribution system Affects:Across the Northend portion of said premises FirstAmerican Title Insurance Company Form WA-S (6/76) Commitment Rle No.:NCS-171106-SA1 Page No.5 Said instrument is a re-record of recording no(s).9405202038 recorded May 20,1994 of Official Records. ,Covenants,conditions,restrictions and/or easements: Recorded:November 17,2000 Recording No.:20001117001354 ,Covenants,conditions,restrictions and/or easements: Recorded:November 17,2000 Recording No.:20001117000535 10.Deed of Trust and the terms and conditions thereof. Grantor/Trustor:DASH-80,L.P.who acquired title as DASH 80,L P,a Washington Grantee/Beneficiary: Trustee: Amount: Recorded: Recording Information: limited partnership TBD U.S.Bank Trust Company,national association $17,000,000.00 November 19,2003 20031119002577 11.Subordination,non-disturbance and attornment agreements: Between Dash-80,L.P.,a Washington limited partnership And Fry's Electronic,Inc Recorded November 19,2003 Recording No.:20031119002578 12.Easement,including terms and provisions contained therein: Recording Information:December 23,2004,Recording No.20041223001308 In Favor of:City of Renton,a municipal corporation For:Public water line Affects:As described therein 13.Terms,conditions,provisions and stipulations of the Partnership Agreement of DASH-80,L.P.,a Washington limited partnership.A copy of the Certificate of Agreement and all amendments which are properly filed with the Secretary of State must be submitted prior to closing.Any conveyance or encumbrance of the Partnership property must be executed by all of the General Partners. NOTE:If the proposed transaction involves a sale of all or substantially all of the Partnership's assets the written consent of all of the Limited Partners should be submitted,prior to closing. 14.Evidence of the authority of the officers of Lowes HIW,Inc.,to execute the forthcoming instrument,copies of the current Articles of Incorporation,By-Laws and certified copies of appropriate resolutions should be submitted prior to closing. 15.A certificate of formation for Lowe$HIW,In€.,is not currently on file with the Secretary of State,as required by statute. FirstAmerican Title Insurance Company Form WA-5 (6/76) Commitment 16. 17. R, File No.:NCS-171106-SAI Page No.6 Matters of extended owner/purchaser coverage which are dependent upon an inspection and an ALTA survey of the property for determination of insurability. Please submit a copy of the ALTA Survey at your earliest convenience for review.Our inspection will be held pending our review of the ALTA Survey and the result of said inspection will be furnished by supplemental report. Unrecorded leaseholds,if any,rights of vendors and security agreement on personal property and rights of tenants,and secured parties to remove trade fixtures at the expiration of the term. According to the application for title insurance,title is to vest in Lowes HIW,Inc.. Examination of the records discloses no matters pending against said party(ies). Property Address:800 Garden Avenue North,Renton,WA 98055 INFORMATIONAL NOTES A° B. C, D, Effective January 1,1997,and pursuant to amendment of Washington State Statutes relating to standardization of recorded documents,the following format and content requirements must be met.Failure to comply may result in rejection of the document by the recorder. Any sketch attached hereto is done so as a courtesy only and is not part of any title commitment or policy.It is furnished solely for the purpose of assisting in locating the premises and First American expressly disclaims any liability which may result from reliance made upon it. The description can be abbreviated as suggested below if necessary to meet standardization requirements.The full text of the description must appear in the document(s)to be insured. Por NWQ &NEQ $9 T23N R5E APN:082305-9217-00 A fee will be charged upon the cancellation of this Commitment pursuant to the Washington State Insurance Code and the filed Rate Schedule of the Company. END OF SCHEDULE B FirstAmerican 77de Insurance Company /. Form WA-5 (6/76) Commitment File No.:NCS-171106-SAI Page No.7 i, , , , ?,.M E First American Title Znsurance Company Naonal CommercialServices COMMITMENT Conditions and Stipulations The term "mortgage"when used herein shall include deed of trust,trust deed,or other security instrument. If the proposed Insured has or acquires actual knowledge of a defect,lien,encumbrance, adverse claim or other matter affecting the estate or interest or mortgage thereon covered by this Commitment,other than those shown in Schedule B hereof,and shall fail to disclose such knowledge to the Company in writing,the Company shall be relieved from liability for any loss or damage resulting from any act or reliance hereon to the extent the Company is prejudiced by failure to so disclose such knowledge.If the proposed Insured shall disclosure such knowledge to the Company,or if the Company otherwise acquires actual knowledge of any such defect,lien, encumbrance,adverse claim or other matter,the Company at its option,may amend Schedule B of this Commitment accordingly,but such amendment shall not relieve the Company from liability previously incurred pursuant to paragraph 3 of these Conditions and Stipulations. Liability of the Company under this Commitment shall be only to the named proposed Insured and such parties included under the definition of Insured in the form of Policy or Policies committed for,and only for actual loss incurred in reliance hereon in undertaking in good faith (a)to comply with the requirements hereof,or (b)to eliminate exceptions shown in Schedule B, or (c)to acquire or create the estate or interest or mortgage thereon covered by this Commitment.In no event shall such liability exceed the amount stated in Schedule A for the Policy or Policies committed for and such liability is subject to the Insuring provisions,exclusion from coverage,and the Conditions and Stipulations of the form of Policy or Policies committed for in favor of the proposed Insured which are hereby incorporated by references,and are made a part of this Commitment except as expressly modified herein. Any claim of loss or damage,whether or not based on negligence,and which arises out of the status of the title to the estate or interest or the lien of the Insured mortgage covered hereby or any action asserting such claim,shall be restricted to the provisions and Conditions and Stipulations of this Commitment. FirstAmerican 77tte Insurance Company Form WA-5 (6/76) Commitment File No.:NCS-171106-SA1 Page No.8 The First American Corporation FirstAmerican Title Insurance Company National Commercial Services PRIVACY POLICY We Are Committed to Safeguarding Customer Information In order to better serve your needs now and in the future,we may ask you to provide us with certain information.We understand that you may be concerned about what we will do with such information particularly any personal or finandal information.We agree that you have a right to know how we will utilize the personal information you provide to us.Therefore,together with our parent company,The First American Corporation,we have adopted this Privacy Policy to govern the use and handling of your personal information. Applicability This Privacy Policy governs our use of the information which you provide to us.It does not govern the manner in which we may use information we have obtained from any other source,such as information obtained from a public record or from another person or entity.First American has also adopted broader guidelines that govern our use of personal information regardless of its source.First American calls these guidelines its Fair Information Values,a copy of which can be found on our website at www.firstam.com. Types of Information Depending upon which of our services you are utilizing,the types of nonpublic personal information that we may collect include: Information we receive from you on applications,forms and in other communications to us,whether in writing,in person,by telephone or any other means; •Information about your transactions with us,our affiliated companies,or others;and' ®Information we receive from a consumer reporting agency. Use of Information We request information from you for our own legitimate business purposes and not for the benefit of any nonaffiliated party.Therefore,we will not release your information to nonaffiliated parties except:(1)as necessary for us to provide the product or service you have requested of us;or (2)as permitted by law.We may,however,store such information indefinitely,including the period after which any customer relationship has ceased.Such information may be used for any internal purpose,such as quality control efforts or customer analysis.We may also provide all of the types of nonpublic personal information listed above to one or more of our affiliated companies.Such affiliated companies include financial service providers, such as title insurers,property and casualty insurers,and trust and investment advisory companies,or companies involved in real estate services,such as appraisal companies,home warranty companies,and escrow companies.Furthermore,we may also provide all the information we collect,as described above,to companies that perform marketing services on our behalf,on behalf of our affiliated companies,or to other finandal institutions with whom we or our affiliated companies have joint marketing agreements. Former Customers Even if you are no longer our customer,our Privacy Policy will continue to apply to you. Confidentiality and Security We will use our best efforts to ensure that no unauthorized parties have access to any of your information.We restrict access to nonpublic personal information about you to those individuals and entities who need to know that information to provide products or services to you.We will use our best efforts to train and oversee our employees and agents to ensure that your information will be handled responsibly and in accordance with this Privacy Policy and First American's Fair Information Values.We currently maintain physical,electronic,and procedural safeguards that comply with federal regulations to guard your nonpublic personal information. c 2001 The First American Corporation -All Rights Reserved FirstAmerican Title Insurance Company Printed:12-14-2005 CITY OF RENTON 1055 S.Grady Way Renton,WA 98055 DEVELOPMENT PLANNING CITY OF RENTON DEC I 2005 gCF nVE Land Use Actions RECEIPT Payment Made: Total Payment: Permit#:LUA05-161 12/14/2005 05:01 PM 3,000.00 Payee: Receipt Number: PACLAND Current Payment Made to the Following Items: Trans Account Code Description ,Amount ...................................................................... 5020 000.345.81.00.0017 Site Plan Approval 3,000.00 R0506725 Payments made for this receipt Trans Method Description Amount ............................................................ Payment Check 29864 3,000.00 Account Balances Trans Account Code Description Balance Due ..................................................................... 3021 303.000.00.345.85 Park Mitigation Fee .00 5006 000.345. 5007 000.345. 5008 000.345. 5009 000.345. 5010 000.345. 5011 000.345. 5012 000.345. 5013 000.345. 5014 000.345. 5015 000.345. 5016 000.345. 5017 000.345 5018 000.345 5019 000.345 5020 000.345 5021 000.345 5022 000.345 5024 000.345 5036 000.345 5909 000.341 5941 000.341 5954 604.237 5955 5998 81 00.0002 81 00.0003 81 00.0004 81 00.0006 81 00.0007 81 00.0008 81 00.0009 81 00.0010 81 00.0011 81 00.0012 81 00 0013 81 00 0014 81.00 0015 81.00 0016 81.00 0017 81.00 0018 81.00 0019 81.00.0024 81.00.0005 60.00.0024 50.00.0000 00.00.0000 000.05.519.90.42.1 000.231.70.00.0000 Annexation Fees Appeals/Waivers Binding Site/Short Plat Conditional Use Fees Environmental Review Prelim/Tentative Plat Final Plat PUD Grading &Filling Fees Lot Line Adjustment Mobile Home Parks Rezone Routine Vegetation Mgmt Shoreline Subst Dev Site Plan Approval Temp Use or Fence Review Variance Fees Conditional Approval Fee Comprehensive Plan Amend Booklets/EIS/Copies Maps (Taxable) Special Deposits Postage Tax .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 .00 Remaining Balance Due:$0.00 Y CITY OF RENTON 1055 S.Grady Way Renton,WA 98055 Printed:12-14-2005 Land Use Actions RECEIPT Permit#:LUA05-161 Payment Made: .Total Payment: 12/14/2005 05:00 PM 500.00 Payee: Receipt Number: PACLAND Current Payment Made to the Following Items: Trans Account Code Description Amount ...................................................................... 5010 000.345.81.00.0007 Environmental Review 500.00 R0506724 Payments made for this receipt Trans Method Description Amount ............................................................ Payment Check 29871 500.00 Account Balances Trans Account Code Description Balance Due ..................................................................... 3021 303 000.00.345.85 Park Mitigation Fee .00 5006 5007 5008 5009 5010 5011 5012 5013 5014 5015 5016 5017 5018 5019 5020 5021 5022 5024 5036 5909 5941 5954 5955 5998 000 345 81.00 000 345 81.00 000 345 81.00 000 345 81.00 000 345 81.00 000 345 81.00 000.345.81 00 000.345.81 00 000.345.81 000.345.81 000.345.81 000.345.81 000.345.81 000.345.81 000.345.81 000.345.81 000.345 81 000.345 81 000.345 81 000.341 60 000.341 50 604.237 00 0002 0003 0004 0006 0007 0008 0009 0010 00.0011 00.0012 00.0013 00.0014 00.0015 00.0016 00.0017 .00.0018 .00.0019 .00.0024 .00.0005 .00.0024 .00.0000 .00.0000 000.05.519.90.42.1 000.231.70.00.0000 Annexation Fees Appeal s/Waivers Binding Site/Short Plat Conditional Use Fees Environmental Review Prelim/Tentative Plat Final Plat PUD Grading &Filling Fees Lot Line Adjustment Mobile Home Parks Rezone Routine Vegetation Mgmt Shoreline Subst Dev Site Plan Approval Temp Use or Fence Review Variance Fees Conditional Approval Fee Comprehensive Plan Amend Booklets/EIS/Copies Maps (Taxable) Special Deposits Postage Tax 3,000 .00 .00 .00 O0 O0 O0 O0 O0 O0 O0 O0 O0 O0 O0 O0 O0 O0 O0 O0 O0 O0 O0 O0 O0 Remaining Balance Due:$3,000.00