Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutCommittee of the Whole - 15 Jul 2019 - Agenda - Pdf CITY OF RENTON AGENDA Committee of the Whole Meeting 5:45 PM - Monday, July 15, 2019 Conferencing Center, 7th Floor, City Hall – 1055 S. Grady Way 1. Garbage/Recycling Concerns a) Presentation 2. King County Solid Waste Com Plan Briefing a) Presentation 3. Homeless Response Governance System a) Memo 4. Emerging Issues Renton Recycles & Global Markets CITY OF RENTON COMMITTEE OF THE WHOLE JULY 15, 2019 LINDA KNIGHT, SOLID WASTE COORDINATOR AGENDA ITEM #1. a) CHINA NATIONAL SWORD CRISIS OR OPPORTUNITY?AGENDA ITEM #1. a) CHINA NATIONAL SWORD WHAT IT IS NATIONAL POLICY STRATEGY TO HELP IMPROVE PUBLIC HEALTH & THE ENVIRONMENT BY: INCREASING DOMESTIC RECYCLING & INVESTMENTS IN RECYCLING INFRASTRUCTURE WEEDING OUT THE “BAD PLAYERS” BANS ON RECYCLABLE MATERIAL IMPORTS Photo: BWJones/Flicker Creative Commons AGENDA ITEM #1. a) 2013 CHINA GREEN FENCE 2015 RENTON REQUEST FOR PROPOSAL 2016 NEW CONTRACT REPUBLIC SERVICES 2017 CHINA NATIONAL SWORD 2019 CHINA BLUE SKY T I M E L I N E AGENDA ITEM #1. a) CHINA NATIONAL SWORD IMPACT AROUND THE GLOBE GLUT OF RECYCLABLE MATERIALS DEPRESSED COMMODITY MARKETS INCREASED COSTS TRANSPORTATION PROCESSING EXPANSION OF PROCESSING & MARKETS IN OTHER DEVELOPING NATIONS MODIFICATIONS TO RECYCLING PROGRAMS AGENDA ITEM #1. a) MATERIALS MOST IMPACTED MIXED PLASTICS MIXED WASTE PAPER AGENDA ITEM #1. a) RECYCLED MATERIALS HISTORICAL AVERAGE PRICE Multifamily Recycling Renton Recycles EOW Recycling Green Fence China Sword Source: Sound Resource Management Group New Contract AGENDA ITEM #1. a) RENTON CONTRACT RISK MANAGEMENT REPUBLIC SERVICES CONTRACTUAL COMMITMENT Independent Examination. In accepting these responsibilities, the Contractor represents and affirms that it has made its own examination of all conditions affecting the performance of this Contract, currently and into the future, and of the quantity, quality, and expense of labor, equipment, vehicles, facilities, properties, materials needed, and of applicable taxes, permits and applicable laws.AGENDA ITEM #1. a) RENTON CONTRACT RISK MANAGEMENT Requirement to Recycle and Compost and Quality Assurance The Contractor shall recycle or compost all Source-separated Recyclables and Compostables collected, unless express prior written permission is provided by Renton. Renton and Contractor agree that the Contractor is being compensated to fully recycle or compost those incoming materials and that maximum cost-effective recovery is a primary objective of the City’s collection programs.AGENDA ITEM #1. a) RENTON CONTRACT DEPRESSED RECYLABLE MARKETS Contract shall not adjust or modify rates due to employee wage increases, changes in Compostables processing fees, Garbage collection service level shifts, or other changes affecting the collection system CITY HAS RIGHTS TO FULLY EVALUATE REQUEST & IS NOT REQUIRED TO TAKE ACTION CITY AND CONTRACTOR MAY NEGOTIATE A MUTUALLY AGREEABLE COURSE OF ACTION INCLUDING, BUT NOT LIMITED TO: Temporary rate increase Elimination of certain recyclable materials Modification of customer preparation requirements Other solutions as necessary Temporary recyclable markets circumstances allow for Contractor to request a temporary rate adjustment or other relief AGENDA ITEM #1. a) REGIONAL RESPONSE RESPONSIBLE RECYCLING TASK FORCE PUBLIC & PRIVATE SECTOR KING COUNTY, SEATTLE & MSWAC CITIES HAULERS & RECYCLE PROCESSORS ADDRESSES 6 AREAS OF ACTION POLICIES LOCAL INFRASTRUCTURE HARMONIZE PROGRAM & MESSAGE INCREASE DEMAND CLEAN MARKETABLE FEEDSTOCK UPSTREAM DESIGN AGENDA ITEM #1. a) RENTON RESPONSE ELIMINATE CONTAMINATION CONTAINER MONITORING PROGRAM OOPS TAGS POLICY REDEFINE RECYCLABLES NO PLASTIC BAG NO SHREDDED PAPER SYSTEM HARMONIZATION EDUCATE CUSTOMER REVISED GUIDELINES SOCIAL MEDIA & NEWSLETTERS PUBLIC EVENTS AGENDA ITEM #1. a) REPUBLIC SERVICES RESPONSE INVESTMENTS IN MRF $6.8 MILLION INVESTMENT IN EQUIPMENT TO IMPROVE MARKETABILITY OF RECYCLABLES SLOWER PROCESSING REQUESTS FOR COST SHARE CONTRACT CITIES / SURCHARGE FOR RESIDENTIAL & COMMERCIAL RECYLING Covington -pending Kent –pending WUTC AREAS -granted AGENDA ITEM #1. a) INDUSTRY RESPONSE -PAPER Paper is one of the most widely recycled materials in the world. Its positive economic and environmental impacts on the circular economy are critical to creating a sustainable future.#KeepRecyclingPaper Source: The Recycling Partnership AGENDA ITEM #1. a) PAPER INDUSTRY INVESTMENTS AGENDA ITEM #1. a) INDUSTRY RESPONSE -PLASTICS ALLIANCE TO END PLASTIC WASTE 1.5 BILLION DOLLAR INVESTMENT TO END PLASTIC WASTE INFRASTRUCTURE DEVELOPMENT TO COLLECT AND MANAGE WASTE & INCREASE RECYCLING DRIVE INNOVATION TO ADVANCE RECYCLING AND PLASTICS RECOVERY EDUCATE & ENGAGE STAKEHOLDERS TO MOBILIZE ACTION CLEAN UP AREAS WITH CONCENTRATED PLASTIC WASTE (e.g. rivers, ocean, etc.) Source: Waste360 and the Alliance to End Plastic Waste AGENDA ITEM #1. a) Questions?AGENDA ITEM #1. a) 1 2019 Comprehensive Solid Waste Management Plan AGENDA ITEM #2. a) 2 A Plan for King County’s Regional System •2,132 square miles •King County and 37 cities •1.5 million residents* •931,000 tons of garbage* *2017 AGENDA ITEM #2. a) 3 Public/Private Partnership •King County •Transfer stations •Landfill •Cities •Provide/contract for curbside collection •Private Companies •Curbside collection •Materials recovery facilities (MRFs) •County/Cities/Private •Promote recycling and sustainability AGENDA ITEM #2. a) 4 Disposal Transfer Services Recycling Key Policy Recommendations AGENDA ITEM #2. a) 5 Recycling: Menu of Actions to Reach 70% •Aspirational goal of moving recycling from 54% to 70% •Menu of actions lets cities tailor approaches to their needs while working toward more unified regional approaches AGENDA ITEM #2. a) 6 Transfer: Continue Modernizing Facilities •Finish station modernization including a new NE facility •Benefits •Improved customer convenience •Faster unloading •Expanded recycling services •Garbage compaction •Sustainable building design and operation •Equitable service levels AGENDA ITEM #2. a) 7 Disposal: Further Develop Cedar Hills Landfill •Maximize capacity within existing landfill footprint •Benefits •Lowest cost per ton •Lowest greenhouse gases •Manages waste locally •Provides time to plan for next disposal option after Cedar Hills is full •Work must begin this year to have new capacity ready in time AGENDA ITEM #2. a) 8 Next Plan Update Will Identify Post-Cedar Hills Disposal Method •Start discussion well before the 5-year update cycle •Options •Waste-to-Energy (mass burn) •Waste Export by Rail •Other emerging technologies AGENDA ITEM #2. a) 9 RPC & County Council Amendments Strengthen The Plan •Use of the buffer •Bird management •Top lift best practices •Height of Areas 5, 6, and 7 •Work plan for post-Cedar Hills disposal •Explore county road mitigation •Send annual landfill report to county council AGENDA ITEM #2. a) 10 Steps in Plan Approval Develop plan and EIS Oct 2016 –Dec 2017 Discuss with Advisory Committees Oct 2016 –Nov 2017 Public comment Jan 8 - Mar 8 2018 Preliminary state review Jan -May 2018 Regional Policy Committee and County Council review Jul 2018 –Apr 2019 City approval May -Sep 2019 Final state approval Oct 2019 2016 2017 2018 2019 We are here AGENDA ITEM #2. a) 11 City Approval of the Plan •Governed by interlocal agreements •City legislation in a 120 day period •Plan is approved if approved by cities representing >75% of the population of cities that act within 120 days •After city approval, Department of Ecology gives final approval within 45 days AGENDA ITEM #2. a) 12 King Street Center 201 South Jackson Street, Suite 701 Seattle, WA 98104-3855 206-477-4466 711 TTY Relay your.kingcounty.gov/solidwaste AGENDA ITEM #2. a) I’COMMUNITYSERVICESDEPARTMENTMEMORANDUMDATE:July11,2019TO:DonPersson,CouncilPresidentMembersofRentoCityCouncilVIA:DenisLaw,MayorFROM:KellyBeymer,CommunityServicesAdministrator,x6617STAFFCONTACT:GuyWilliams,HumanServicesManager,x6652DougLevy,OutcomesbyLevySUBJECT:HomelessResponseGovernanceISSUE:ShouldtheCityprovidefeedbackonandbecomepartofthenewHomelessResponseGovernancesystem?RECOMMENDATION:BecomepartoftheHomelessResponseGovernancesystemandrequestthataCityofRentonelectedofficialandtheHumanServicesManagerparticipateandrepresenttheCity.BACKGROUNDSUMMARY:Homelessnessthroughouttheregionisagrowingproblem.TheCitycontinuestobecommittedtoprovidingservicesandresourcestocombattheissueofhomelessness,especiallyamongseniors,womenandchildren.ThisisevidentfromourcollaborationwithagencieslikeREACHandtheCenterofHope,whichishousedatRentonCityHallandservesasadayshelterforwomenandchildrenandmenwithchildren.Additionally,theHumanServicesDivisionsupportstheSalvationArmyrentandutilitiesassistanceprogram,theREACHRentonMealCoalition,RentonKiwanisClothesBank,andtheCatholicCommunityServicesARISEMenShelter.ThesearejustafewoftheagenciesbeingsupportedthatprovideservicesinRentontohelpourmostvulnerablepopulations.RentonisalsoafoundingandparticipatingmemberoftheSouthKingHousingandHomelessnessPartners(SKHHP)andhasearmarked$60,000incontributionstoSKHHPtohelpcovertheorganization’sfirsttwoyearsofoperations.Presumably,anyactionRentoncontemplateswithrespecttoacentralizedHomelessResponseGovernancestructureshouldbecoordinatedwithSouthKingCounty-basedSKHHPefforts.AGENDA ITEM #3. a) RentonCityCouncilPage2of3July11,2019Ontheheelsofthe“OneTable”effortlastyear,theKingCountyExecutiveandtheCityofSeattleMayorinitiatedaseriesofdiscussionsaroundregionalhomelessnessgovernance.OthersinvolvedinthesediscussionsincludedAllHome,Vulcan,theSeattleChamber,philanthropicgroups,etc.SoundCitiesAssociation(SCA)alsoparticipatedthroughDeannaDawsonandelectedofficials.InhisroleasChairoftheSCAPublicIssuesCommittee(PlC),CouncilmemberPrincewasoneoftheelectedparticipantsindiscussions.ConcurrentwiththediscussionswasaconsultantstudybythefirmNationalInnovationServices(NIS),whichmadeaseriesofrecommendationsaroundhomelessgovernance.Amajorrecommendationwastoestablishanentitythatwasmoreconsolidatedandlessfractured.Otherrecommendationsincludedacallformoredata-basedmanagement,communitycoordination,andracialjustice/equityfilters.Theenvisioned“homelessnessgovernance”beingexaminedwouldfocusonresponseeffortssuchasrapidre-housing,shelter,diversion,trackinganddatamanagement,andnavigationsystems.Thegovernancewouldnotinterferewithlocaldecision-makingovermatterssuchasland-use,encampments,parksfacilities,andthelike.ThesediscussionsandtheensuingNISreportledKingCountyandSeattletoconcludetheywantedtomoveforwardwithconsolidationandestablishmentofaresponsesystem.SCAstillhasquestionsandhasnotsignedonasofyet,butSCAstaffhasprovidedongoingbriefingstoPlC.Inrecentmonths,KingCountyandSeattlehavedonemoreworkandhavedeterminedthatanautonomousgovernancestructuresuchasaPublicDevelopmentAuthority(PDA)couldworkwellasastructurethatcanbesetupunderexistinglaw.TheKingCountyExecutive’sofficewouldliketoreceiveinputfromRentononthreeidentifiedcoreareasbeforetheendofthemonth,andpriortoafirst-draftInter-LocalAgreement(ILA)beingcompiledandbroughtbeforeKingCountyandSeattleCityCouncils:1)Aboardforthehomelessresponsegovernanceentity:Therearewide-rangingopinionshere,from“makeitallappointedwithsubject-matterexperts,noelected”to“theremustbeelectedofficials.”Therearealsodisparateopinionsaboutputtingpeoplewith“livedexperience”(formerlyhomeless)ontheboard.2)ParticipationforcitiesotherthanSeattletobe“in”theAuthority:TheCountyExecutive’sofficewouldliketoknowifothercitieswishtotakepart—andhow.Someoptionstoconsiderare:anMOUthatsaysothercitiessupportthegovernanceentityandwouldtakeactionsconsistentwiththepolicyAGENDA ITEM #3. a) RentonCityCouncilPage3of3July11,2019underpinnings;citiesprovidingfundingandensuringatleastthatmuchofthefundingisspentwithintheircommunity;participatingcitiesmaintainingcontrolovertheuseoffunds.3)Oneentityoroneentitywith“sub-regional”tailoring:KingCountyandSeattlehavegottenfeedback—particularlyfromSCArepresentatives—abouthavingtheabilitytotailoreffortstoaccountfordifferencesinsub-regionssuchasSouthCounty,EastCounty,andSea/Shore.WhiletheExecutivebranchesofKingCountyandSeattlearemovingaheadonthenewgovernancestructure,therewillbeawholeroundofadditionalconversationwiththeirrespectivecouncils.Plus,KingCountyfullyunderstandsthatmanyoftheKingCountycitiesviewSeattleasapoorexampleofhowtodohomelessnessresponseworkandwouldnotwanttoseeKingCountyandSeattledominatethedecisionmakingwithinanewentity.CONCLUSION:StaffrecommendstheCityconsiderbecomingapartofthenewhomelessresponsegovernancesystem—thoughmoreinformationisneededonwhatthissystemwilldoandhowcitiessuchasourscanbeassuredthatfundscontributedwillbeusedandoverseenbythejurisdictionsthatprovidethem.WealsorecommendhavinganelectedofficialaswellasourHumanServicesManagerparticipateinongoinghomelessnessgovernanceconversationssothatRentonhasavoiceatthetable.CitystaffisattendingtheSouthKingCountyHomelessnessActionCommittee(HAC)onJuly17,2019,todiscussthismatterandfurtherdetailswillbeprovidedafterthisissueisvettedfurtherbytheHAC.AGENDA ITEM #3. a)