Press Alt + R to read the document text or Alt + P to download or print.

No preview available

The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutHouser Way Bridge - Seismic Retrofit and Painting Project Info (9-12-19) PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT M E M O R A N D U M • DATE: September 12, 2019 TO: Bob Hanson, Transportation Design Manager FROM: Derek Akesson, Transportation Project Manager SUBJECT: Houser Way Bridge—Seismic Retrofit and Painting Project Information and Proposed Design Standards Summary: The purpose of this memo is to summarize the existing conditions of the project site and bridge and proposed design standards. Existing Conditions: Exhibit A—Vicinity Map and Area Map of bridge location. Exhibit B—Site Photos from Sept. 2016. Exhibit C— Bridge record drawings (1960). Exhibit D—Seismic retrofit drawings from project in 1995. Exhibit E—Scour repair drawings from project in 1998. Exhibit F— Bridge condition inspection report and WSBIS form (2018 inspection). Exhibit G — Bridge Load Rating Summary (2017). Exhibit H — Memo Preliminary Seismic Evaluation (2017). Exhibit I — Memo Scour Assessment (2017). Exhibit J —Test results for lead paint (2006). Exhibit K— Local Agency Agreement and Project Prospectus. Street: • Houser Way is a one way street over the bridge. • ADT= 11,315, per traffic count performed in June 2015. • The posted speed limit is 25 mph. Bridge: • Structure ID: 08584300 • Bridge No.: Renton-05 • The bridge is currently posted for weight limits. • There are no pedestrian facilities on this bridge. Pedestrians use the pedestrian bridge, adjacent to the Houser Way Bridge, to cross over the Cedar River. Bob Hanson Page 2 of 2 September 12,2019 Cedar River: • The Cedar River is documented to have Chinook, Coho and Sockeye Salmon, Steelhead and Cutthroat Trout. • The anticipated fish window for the Cedar River is mid-June to mid-August. • The United States Geological Survey (USGS) maintains a monitoring station at the Bronson Way Bridge. The following is a link to the USGS website with the monitoring station data: https://waterdata.usgs.gov/nwis/uv?site no=12119000. Design References: • Washington State Department of Transportation (WSDOT), Local Agency Guidelines (LAG), dated May 2019. • WSDOT, Bridge Design Manual, dated July 2019. • WSDOT/APWA 2020 Standard Specifications. • American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials (AASHTO), LRFD Bridge Design Specifications, current edition. • AASHTO, Policy on Geometric Design of Highways and Streets, dated 2011. Bridge Painting: • The existing paint system contains lead. • The City has not been able to find any record of re-painting this bridge since construction in 1960. • There are areas of rust and potential section loss on the steel girders. One area of particular concern is the welded joint between web and bottom flange of the westernmost (downstream) girder(downstream face). Refer to Exhibit B site photos and Exhibit F bridge inspection report. • The City anticipates full removal of the existing paint system in order to identify and conduct repairs to steel elements of the bridge as necessary. Seismic Retrofit: • Refer to Exhibit H for a preliminary seismic evaluation. • Refer to Exhibit D for plans of a seismic retrofit performed in 1995. h:\file sys\ted-transp engr design\ted 40-projects\04021 houser way bridge\2000 prelim engr\2200 studies\project info memo\working files\memo-houser way bridge-seismic retrofit and painting project info.docx EXHIBIT A Houser Way Bridge — Seismic Retrofit and Painting VICINITY MAP Lake -� N E W C A S T L F Was hing t-on 1 O a .a �• 5 f�a NE 4th St at SL 9. RE N-T-O N '+ 1 CO r � +• . : �• � � fir{__�.`�� -- ir. F � 1' j is■�.�ii Otro --SP�T92nd St Lake Houser Way Bridge — Seismic Retrofit and Painting AREA MAP { z \ `> ^ ® F N f = � ¥ - G ¥ `n w 7 O, » :3 effy Park , . = Cedar &a£Park 9 Renton Dam Z ,. . - - sy, @ ' Renton mm % \ ' - . y `� d cityHW *} . Cent Ce e. % / { ` . 3rdS,,. z ^ City a Renton City 2Dryton- EXHIBIT B Houser Way Bridge — Site Photos (Sept. 2016) oil r _e lil�rirr• s Looking northeast at westernmost (downstream)girder Looking southwest at easternmost(upstream)girder Nam, li ,aF r Looking south at southern pier Looking north at northern pier Houser Way Bridge — Site Photos (Sept. 2016) Looking west under south approach span Looking north under south approach span Looking north at middle spindle, south approach span Looking north at bearing, south end of main span girder Houser Way Bridge — Site Photos (Sept. 2016) Looking west under north approach span Looking south at middle spindle, north approach span Looking south at west end of northern pier Looking south at bearing, north end of main span girder Houser Way Bridge — Site Photos (Sept. 2016) ay �JA Q - Looking north at northern pier, middle girder Looking east at west face of downstream girder yy» a �uiuiurmil ITiimWl41lN�III Looking southwest at north end of bridge Looking south over bridge deck from north end EXHIBIT C w a� n m 2� 000 V v v vv�I v 0 r �/Ewsfi i6tKMa Lgw� / ✓eie€sr/rs, h' -- �� 1 1J�2 / �"? - (�044 zoo PL A N I _ePPRGK//✓ F C�I�FW T/?(CS i 1 z) r os 9 CAW k ,�Cbss H L v So sh__f / Ears b)-, , GK. ✓2ro 98 ,SYrrz.YvD Carbm Sfa'+l (LmF:S A f1 B#l�r� 4 t�h P66 1ybrdys 2ml Zeo. o yb� µfork Lrne 2ae,t3s Jb562 _h8f,..,h 'lS f /4 /6'6Dmm Wakr F7am LLbp Sw YaApweTy Gwa.�g nd aha� _ ib yp mon # FAc f�.nb 195. _F 3of r) Sel cha 2 d..oy�ipzw oo C'/6 7$ OunSd /9,�iP Eauie -3P. m 4�3tl,Z lv. a'moveg Exrsr�mo�:L' ,,75: •LF°Y -aP%. $D' f,r� s P/vnr Mry i z;a Trn 9117 P/ sr�"roPo E l95tor 'Irret Lw.�PS'�m C,F. 99 1 �p�p �tl �°� UUDE'�P,9SS M4D(t'CAT/Oh' tp4F0� -.. � W ry Y3 SFiucF E frAn /20, CY. � om�ifi Fbrntlenh J8 C�! W R.n Z3 /90 ff ✓ fcaf Gu�ve. � '- ZS 4I GY 35 Nrs. ii �oage `ROF/ik GRAPE us s DATUM F«c ©E6rGN Nor;; /adin9 HtS sfz '.QO ... -_ __ .. .,_ __. _ _ ___ L nc Cfcss A A'A.f30.oz"'�o., 31 F` F=,J�o� ssfoe� sf A- • •.4 €arse. ,repo.:dFs nnoe i _ _ ,� ,- za R-146103 -zt Jo � A di rorr FreE. >/ 'r ��d�^'^ f m ' �_ from woranom F .Groa e.,c-ce. JS ti l - CITY 4T RENTED HOUSER WAY BRI'�:Gi ro ;eJeV AND APPROACHES ELEVA 7"IPM , s<;�°'j!*";o•" GENERAL- PLAN M t ------- DESIGNED�BY CECL G. FfiNOLD CONSULTING fx6ix EEP -__ .__.___.._.._... ...__ • -- 'y,�,�_ SFATi IENaSN�NGTON SHT Of I ... r r- -- -- - - - - -- - - r 'Su _ ti\ 9I .wt Pt_ DF vJ �J ten, ry.nr.� y o a GJ_ ¢ , Wi Y J L i�l{� a � I r i ol/ A,v fir+ gJ _ — z „f i V I � � r T 1-7 f 1III ( F HSER WAY AW BRIDGE AND PPRDAC A HES 1I _.HST APPROACH SPAN SC L -- _ j . corvsu�TiNs EQRNQLD iuewEEN +. 1-1NGiON._ St 2 Of3•�.. --------------- J aE ? iST I. r " 4aT1 /7 I �k .%r _fC)<'ZQN A�1.. ° o P R-146105 t � roc i 7 p R 41TV dE RE NO ' HOUSER WAV BRIDG= * - r74.- AND ARPR OACHES r MAIN PIERS b n -E — .. � IN57Lu,e:j-"�/'o F - zN�97 sr✓e:,y"<<s f pp,- 4c+L_LD' r * R Am - ocsienao c ECI. c. vaeivoIo ° PoNSUJ N5 EN — —T LE„WASH G ON $!iT,'j OFI n+ J—r bey pbyYr ,,yy r o/mn 9 z I 4 s G i. s r Uk 4j Fecflr ., d 1 N ,\ Ny yu� �:¢ 4q L re 1. S �%` - ♦ i.�rr.�, nT IMo,k toc ",Jn 7V LAhJ _LES.r_aPf R�CF1C G_FF'Ro(.CH �iFa(L—ElEdltclA ..�' loa" A.,oA161JT,.� 1iEQ,U1E17 !off c.. n y<p 7rJ f I 4 H b fis hus - 1 p.ys �• e - ��6�' a r N � 1.ti B_T. R-146106 r _ t 7 � r r —�_ r _ � CIT. o1 AE�,oN HOUSER WAY RRID3E AND APPROACHES B.o.r,�AC ss 1P'o- \ WEST APPROACH_ 'SIDAN ------------- ar eu OLD - SEnnLE,Nn5n N�62N�TIIG crvGirvEEP SST 0. , � e kl P I w. \i. R�—� P t j � ¢ S\ u� � I a _ d �N1 1 0 .{. �n n n n n � -- -��_. o -•• C+-3 fi lck�^,< c/i'�=.+-_ —�'�CF-�OFl3i i. C' A-- o OEGK 1444-- - lh 7--Tt I rs f /lo Z" £CCV/i7 U �� G/lIJt KS d R I46I07 f Ca211 ) z 4C .x t]6-e}g /�.t-de'v nrs 1 I c MiSS_flsL 1 a; 4 3 T j 001, E rc 9orrcs A rp c .� - Y �eHo sER wnvoGEZ? gB - rta 3� ANJ APPROACHES &RD.FR SPAN `I FRAMING PL4N 7 V EK S N a°�.€ r ram Fes-fNd r t+,,.,i& yy""", o - r o au P>ro..,o.a4>/b a¢' •�fm 11 v 1 P'`ie /a.;�o- u.;.`s - k.a G,�1rSpY a✓t rop a1?+^fF" as >ra��e oOd '€ � AGN mow GNU.ENGINEER 5 oeh Ip /lei¢ Maks. 2z."SP sl-eel ppe}` 21- " \ 44°'..4 Ufuyf ✓ D-.fX1ST� '4! f ,9'sd3herr I Shoo or Fs.'I W ld m� mnr m C.-:Yia Er-Ma V H CONh PC TOf -'A MGM LL G .GS F E N r - Ina-xr rc I I �, eva"uNlns^ _ 1-Gk3��/S,rD-v ZV � �y ITV l P 3-,°m. Fbff M 3R`s`OE6. ) -J§l'l_ ' oEbry,Sl6 H fs Ppj q /I ?-d. � -- � ,-. -- °\ vae �` 1 cx6l+se xo• `"3 9.T'_..G'�'Qa^^:.FPAjNC� — e 2EC T/ON 'VA_ - e� 41i-' t,s WAL is i ti d s - 0 %I Y Ke vAr„ r TROrF�v�Rs T(6 o-r J, JMS Ppe eye. .e.,r erozN r n t r h L . i •� - tll 52 d.�t Pipe �� d ttT 9i REN 0 6-=o ,. HOUSER WAY @RID.G= 5'EGTlON 00 AND AWRROACHES J a GIRDER SPAN DET4,�LSI r �t rr — 6✓, - Gin/Ftr R6J Fief P s@r#. APM�'h� D F I E --� � � TY, v G=4P6K OCi�tlLS BA�LINU /r-EV GRJf'- IP"`/ Sco/e: -p DES 6NED 8 - -T701NT.' ceci� c.ARNOLD W 5 LT NG.EN 6NEEF s«". a4„,o v, ��'o�le��/'O + sE mE mns 6 pr13 }• I M af.yo.. 0 s h4 / sn YAK ac,.o as ..r ;v. t_-s. - LAe.1`u'er<' F�/Z 1/I�-7 TE L ro/r„4k� T �A.^ a ^i��+br/foh 1` j8c dl - �" el L r �> 6' B� M - - f .Les- . xp,4 5 JN -LI V4 A OM sa a ai y R-146109 PLE,N.o Lctj` k / 5 -Le 4a�k�w fh�ddeb� � V lo V. E w ,a a �Sl R APPROACHES HE, ,GE /c 6kax igzP4 � <' F{Q '✓ � �' VI _ s�e.e l/t VA Bf�I� M15C vI < -R DETAILS "o e aR A ccE.a r lnro' g — L 0 P—z e",e4 RT Ek1-Pl � c a ry o C S E G E a - E iTL�E SHIN GTON _NIT 7 Oil Z x6 a.F n y R a p V F a � 4 a 1� icy w -//TJ ..L_ -. ��O"' ��_ ---'- _� _.... � ��.-..- ..•�_ ..__- _x/._.�. .�..{�' Z Ofi>.4.ssyy66 lba.3<lk a 3/a } ALAAlfx& tf 6Rl I m R-14 146 110 .�r r a: 61RDEfe''__�'L6 LG4Tf�JN • . FtrpsF k':v3nnHl.nmr w/(6w CITY OF PEN TON • hh MOUSER WAY BRIDC-E ,�%n1 JP a> o AND APPROACHES v •° �"' GIRDER SPAN y ALTERNATE DESIG�i p aoT,oM_if1. LVCr + 1 t P G 0 FP M y�KJ_.•;.. __s�� DEB16N By L� CECIL CC NRN OLO �_� GON$ULi N EN6INE ER SEAiiLE,t-InsN NGTOry o, w i .-._. - _. _ •moo ...�" �Ff � ra°.E� - - _ e = — 1 \ o R-14,6111 TE VA — — — — J �•�� — - - — so Sfgi'LE,�NAr�ero« —=sr,. a, . - J:353.9 z. Yp `Weald F.ringsl vv)1' 0 o 1�' o __ € 'a_r•,,�• __ _ _._._— _ _.._ �J' OfTA/L OF SGEC/A!_.: RA/L/ft/G g u Amy 2 � - s - R-146112 ... - - Ism M! �- _ b _ 6 LEE a so /e. wroo m.nn sEnrnEsweswiHeroH ser ar: _ yyy l`y / i I- ✓ _ r i Tr t.,z S - r � VI , � e B � '� t ��_{ 4i�la..,<m. pf�a..,�.,.F�,rd.. i �._._ � _. �`�t,�, ear's��. /6.�,.i�✓`° c1� � z,. �rfi !- p' Tnvdo D I -�r .I-y_<��---'�.-tl^"' ��t°yr JJ^T �-7 p,'.�. �r✓Twd � b A� - # A� � }y se r oasa all e n r a i i ft P d- ey/r 1P1 a v.. i yo,rry i y� SECT 10n/ -c PLq N TEM7P0 A Y A ,PO G 1if5 a,+., ,w„}>✓fu,.a n..,c°,¢Wrb/�t F s.taw/h> "g�� ___ -- r�, °Shsef/3 fa.dh./So{imp Ny tuoh mia�.rc ,erg, l-OU S.I?TMVVAV [j RIDCz_ AND APPPOACHES TEMPORARY CROSSING or _ mEo ccaL� ARIOLO c. J,53 I I_:.a Q j f e r ti sou w.+�c o I �#v`fi�� I I I O Ntt N ry E A-i.y S/Ml.ae �VIC �L3 I 1 2 5 WaN� 42 1 yE{f wok. r �z Wr 7} 0 a R-146114 c ry of uE To HOUSER WAY BR.IDS,IAND APPROACHES u—Ewr Lai,P - UNDERPASS MODIFICQIION A��t �z fS D TE N.. � r i .--�'� ,-y � ran e� � ,ROADWAY SECT/OYV 0 � � h� � td '�' ,X,.nlar x�fi,"/Ch. �f�lon�:a� -,e,•,,,V. ,! ! I:. a ,d - x', �—_z-p egad y Lan< d v Lo-�E-. 4 WA'3�➢yM 9,N kVM'.A(•v uan -I.-4` IT ..Y '(!j �CPi o ��I ! sro� � asw m E� p ✓ZOAC11Ms('Y 5EC T1ON@STA./6tOO IH 04v,Na A( .T,e 47-44. V co u- �v R-146115 Iv— 1,d _-i '. h;, `'w• rb' can L�: t Nd ` r ..z--_�._ Ni_F"RE pry. c c = l / inn c Y O ems- �„ 3 l '.'. 1 - H"I�SER wAv f3RIDG£ z AND APPROACHES —_---_— .gGraerCw WATER MAIN�ROnDWnY SEC cca,� avw4LL1 v Gr_,RQ - DE GNED can�Y CECIL C AR,OLD ��t EXHIBIT D INDEX ,5HT, N0. TITLE SCHEDULE A: HOUSER WAY BRIDGE, FEDERAL PROJECT NUMBER BRM—1169(010) SCHEDULE 8, WILLIAMS AVE. BRIDGE, FEDERAL PROJECT NUMBER BRM—1155(00 1) DErars GENERAL NOTES I ALL�lLlLL,kL AND WORXMANSHZP SHALL IAL IN A-11-171 HE I OF.1___ LEGEND 0—rssa NDI-Y(L' —ATISSS 5tilLFS—AL LI'll—A tf— I —,1111 OF—._1—1 ILL.—1DESFCNED Ll sy A--—AS, "Lil—AS-—A—_____y_ 'AFLf"i 1112 TAKEM OR SOWN ON 5YI ET A SIAtuDAAO — 11.All BEEN"l, A,ACCELERATIONl S .1 I " WtffRE SECTION.V%EW ORA —5 SHOWN ON THE IIA11 All.—OI.�DFIGWAL DET-SIS 7�KAN IS 1- Ly THE G'i'YCFR64TON SA. LEE M.aN�p.G/ fiiH-,cx 'pERgprytyv/. DIMENSIONS All —It HE—1 ERRED Br llE CON?;CYOR All—RAIT L—A FlAttittlLf7i FlAl—PRO.LET 3fALL BE _UC ILL SAL—1- All—IL CONFORM 1 11 I ALL—71—11 11 1— VICINITY MAP THE CONSAACSOR SHALL—ALL NEW—C—C—Al AALL 11——Ir At —11,SlAAS—AS A —T_--I—W4SRX LI—11.WIIS — -. ....I�Al LPAT'—--l— 1 A 1 —ll—GI 0, ",—At" 11"—AND ittIlO fAINLWG SlIALLT IFONE— 0 ANO CfE iliS(Sl COAT LILLIS LLS EFA 11—A A-1-11 l—F,,AAW'c-,-" AL7—CbAr—li`,LlLDDE A—Ol'TITANIUM LI)ASi[I AND T l't'N'='R.X=_—M—M Z SUCH _11AII—CLAT.AIII—T T,7 S STAllAA`l�ff�11 A A—AFANCft0.4 ft0D5SLLALL Ill I—Af—A-77Ai IT ND n/^ AC 3U'-FY9EIJC43tCEANCIHM TEN—G A- -1 A.—I f PIA11'I'AS.—WIL OR A--ISSIA, —1 1 CISSWLTE—1 AND 11,1 1— 1 GE N —SUFA—5 ILL——,[S EIIAL iiO 11 lIfASANCHOn NW IAI 11— JrCITY 0: RENTON -221S "-6 9, COVER SHEET I's 7AIC 4".121151 ............. I "1 -1 Al I I-A-1—A I_f -T— T-- I- 19 18 17 18 15 14 13 12 11 10 9 8 7 6 RfU'ox J,0378 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 SEC. 17, T23N, R.5E., W.M. CITY OF RENTON PLEB 1 BRIDGE PLAN BAN BEARING BAR 2XZX) 6"-� B I'f A-1 A A--A-11 �11 UPPER PLATE CAP .1 Al 1-1- D ll�11TE 6-S �A I(-I -ER T A- i J 3 E 'A IA BUtT sl � Ll PLAN VIE TYPICAL RETROFIT OF MAIN SPAN EF-ARIN 1T F"SZI;ll C_IT A IT -Pll.1 A DETAIL 7-221T _�Ty 11 RENTO PIER PIER __� _ Z.w. _ i EA LAYOUT PLAN GENERAL PLAN&DETAILS 20 19 18 17 15 1r5 14 13 12 11 10 9 8 6 14 15 16 17 18 RAR 1)x V379 ' 6 7 8 9 10 1 12 13 1 SEC. 17, T23N., R.5E., W.M. CITY OF RENTON SPAN l o AN BRIDGE PLAN -Al —11—1 A OWCN IA T-2215 CITY OF R�F,NTON PIER PIER GENERAL PLAN LAYOUT PLAN RE"'i [A I f I F if At F. IA I I 19 18 17 16 15 14 13 12 11 10 9 8 7 6 ox 8 ' 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 RA�� 38 A% 7 17 BEARING "F HEARING R£MOYE EXISTING XEEFER BAR T REGION N0. STA�� FEDERAL PROJECT NO. f UPPER P A—SPAN A, 'AN EWD A"'A 'I IA El UPPER PLATE MODIFICA 770N I—E I,Nl L ATF 1A 7E PEDESTAL TOP O<Pi ER 2 OR j LPLA7 ExIsTimo NEW EXTENSION R ANCHOR ELE VA TI PLA All.1-1 -IF �W6 Mill PATE fG NEW dCAffNQ P LOWER PLA 7F MODIFICATION I -1l— H Ft- TYPICAL APPROACH SPAN BEARING RETROFIT6AI p1l DETAIL_rA_ TLI-2- 'A"MI""I, A-ANCHOR ROD 1EQ11AA BEARING) _ 0 LONER 1b, V ELEVATION END VIE TYPICAL MAIN SPAN EXPANSION BEARING RETROFIT PLAN T PLATE DETAILff) < 7 T-2215 F_ crry OF RENTON .I u>�waava+r or reeve wossa ELEVA 71 11—T-- A-A W TYPICAL MAIN SPAN FIXED BEARING RETROFIT j DETAILS DETAIL ..0 9:ct Mo-41-2216' _4 I A' I I f A I A I A I I I A I I I IA I I 19 18 17 16 15 14 13 12 11 10 9 8 7 6 f4iV)x 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 R _ J03 8 1 EXHIBIT E Sit a CITY OF RENTON a � o = om Department of Public Works 0 U of $ SCOUR REMEDIATION AND EROSION CONTROL, �z �a ut HOUSER WAY BRIDGE EF TITLE SHEET NO. COVER SHEET 1 s VICINITY MAPS, GENERAL NOTES 2 � I HOUSER WAY BRIDGE 3 s JUNE 1, 1998 j , conamarq Fn9xyeQ^e 9arvka. so9 W.mp9: at.nr.e. Olymply WA 99a9t•tt43 t SUMMARY OF QUANTITIES GENERAL NOTES e ITEM UNIT AYOUNi OF MATERIAL AND WORKMANSHIP SHALL RE IN F TRANSPORTATION WITH THE REQUIREMENTS •�. t.� 'B=' 9r. --- OF THE 1ATI NSWANHINGTONRDA STATE DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION STANDARD t MOBILIZATION ES. T SPECIFICATIONS FOR ROAD.BRIDGE AND MUNICIPAL CONSiRUCTICaI, 0 2 ' � 'e 2 TRAFFIC CONTROL L.S i THE CEDAR RIVER AND MAY CREEK ARE CRUCIAL SALMON AND SISTINE.SPAWNING GROUND.ALL WORKS SHALL BE PERFORMED WITH STRICT ADHERENCE TO PERMIT V B 3 CLEARING,GRUBBING 4 RGASSIDE CLEAN-UP I.S 1 REQUIREMENTS,AND CONSTRUCTION WINDOWS AS DIRECTED BY SPAWNING SEASONS. p LI: 4 STRUCTURE EXCAVATION CLASS 8-INCLUDES HAUL CU.YO 18T ALL AREAS OF OF BANK INFER IMPACTED BY CONSTRUCTION SHALL BE REFAHALL I C i0 THE w PROJECT l�'r SATISFACTION OF THE ENGINEER BY THE CONTRACTOR.REPAIRS SHALL INCLUDE i}PLACEMENT OR EARTH AND STONE SO THAT THE BANK GLADE RISES FROM THE WATER SITE 5 PERMANENT CONSiRUCtiON QOIEXT[LE-GLASS B So TO *3 IN A SMOOTH TRANSITION TO MEET THE ROADWAY LEVEL. ¢p 2)PLANTING OF GRASS OR SHRUBBERY,OR OTHER INOIGENOLD PLANTS AS DIRECTED BY 6 LIGHT-LOOSE RIPRAP ID iqJ THE ENGINEER. AD ={ :I. J BANK RESTORATION L.S. 3)REPAIR OF EXISTING BANK DUE TO EROSION THAT WOULD.IF LEFT UNCORRECTED, S _ CAUSE FUNRE DAMAGE TO THE BANKS. THE RIPRAP SHALL BE EITHER MACHINE CR HANOPLACED.LARGEST STONES SHALL BE LOCATED AT BOTTOM OF SLOPE AT TOE.AFTER RIPRAP 15 IN POSITIM EXCAVATED DIRT SHALL BE USED TO FILL VOIDS IN THE RIPRAP. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR ALL TRAFFIC CONTROL REQUIREMENTS. 55 THE PRQECT SITE SHALL BE LEFT IN A CLEAN AND TIDY CONDITION TO THE g@ SATISFACTION OF THE ENGINEER, g THE PURPOSE OF THIS WORK IS TO PROVIDE SCOUR PROTECTION TO THE LEFT BANK F Rg PIER USING RIPRAP.THIS REQUIRES EXCAVATION OF APPROXIMATELY 50 FT.OF BANK Drza AND STREAMBED FOR DEPTHS VARYING BETWEEN 2 FL(z)AGO 7FT It),PLACEMENT ti W OF A GECTEXTTLE BLANKET FOR EM EROSION CWiROL,AND PLACENT OF BROKEN STONE —RAP WITH WEIGHT GRADUATIONS BETWEEN 50 INS AND 1 TON, F HOUSER WAY BRIDGE ai 9 VICINITY MAP i Py� 8 i a HOUSER WAY BRIDGE � IIII G C S VICINITY MAPS,GENERAL NOTES aoo w.uWa o1W.s:.rvne. SCOUR REMEDIATION g a..WA 88601-YY4a PACE 2 OF 3 DATE:JUNE 1,1998 O LEFT BANK TO BE EXCAVATED AS NECESSARY EDGE OF RAILROAD BRIDGE EXTEND RIPSTAP TO MEET LARGE A-11 H I SLOPE I ��iXISTING RIPRAP STONES.SLOPE AND OF RIPRAP AS GIVIT ANY NECESSARY TOKNEES FORM LEASEEM HIGH WATER NARK TRA-TIA E.GTIE` ------STERIES 2'THICKNIGHT DANK EDGEDURING SORGAL APLALTA.LOCATION UP STREAM ED AMITER ROW ORDINARY HIGH WATER ROW PERMANENT COAST GEOTEXTILE A, yJ/lIFl FACE (CLASS IS CYP.) B, S, rAPllEll -GLING BANK k STREAMED) PIER SECTIONe EB HOUSER WAY BRIDGE (DIRECTION OF IT-IC) R,' A.D.ENT "IT ,N A' PACE LC tT E. z lEGCPDRAl ------------------------ BRIDGE PIER BANK REPAIR * MATCH UP TO o -------------- ---------- -STING CABIONG [11 IAIY HIGH APPRoX----------- WATER ELMARK GOWNGLINE --------- ---------------- S ---------------- ---------------------- v APPREOF LOBATTON OP D RW E.IGH.D TE UGLIG LEVW_EL NALRI I F.1 GROUND LINE NO TO PLACEMENT OF RIPRAP TO'ILL MUMS LINE AT I!�A STOP 4' PLAN INCEATONATE INCTOESOUS BANK MATERIAL _IEFT BANK PIER AND PROVIDE FOR A V BLANKET COVER AS SINTVN (FACING—STREAM) 11 A A tO 11 50 ....OR MAKE 2 THILK LIGHT 100SE IS lKISTONG —WITH I FT BELOW FNPWAP LAICS(NE.) FEET ATTEAMBIS EIRREADDED LOWEST POINT 2. MALANG(LOW-POINT) SUMMARY OF QUANTITIES ION NO. QUANTITY UNITS I SECTION "S OT, LIGHT LLZ.E -ANY DAMAGE TO BANK RESULTING INI TOP 11 FRgA.111-HON SHALL.11111AL 111AIAHIN REPAIRED BY ME CONTRACTOR TO THE YD' CONSTRUCTION INOTENTILE SATISFACTION TO ME ENG:NE_N, FEET PROJECT ADDRESS ELEV H, SEC.17,LES R05 ADJACENT PROPERTY OWNERS CITY OF RENTON HOUSER WAY 1. CITY OF RENTON INTERSECTION WITH CEDAR RIVER 2 B.S. RAILROAD CO. HOUSER WAY BRIDGE DIRECTIONS 1-405 TO 167 HEAD NORTH TO S END ST PLAN &ELEVATION HEAD EAST I WELLS,TAKE SOUTH T HOUSER WAY AND HEAD EAST TO THE BRIDGE. zoe AM.- SCOUR REMEDIATION WA PAGE 3 OF 3 DATE:JUNE 1,1998 EXHIBIT F BRIDGE INSPECTION REPORT Page 1 of 5 Status:Released Printed On: 314l2019 Agency: RENTON CD Guid:88343323-32f8-4875-b977-626bf8bcd508 Release Date: 1/2812019 Program Mgr: Roman G.Peralta Br. No. RENTON-05 SID 08584300 Br. Name HOUSER WAY BRIDGE Carrying HOUSER WAY Route On 01169 Mile Post 0.00 Intersecting CEDAR RIVER Route Under Mile Post inspe AG Cert# G1103 Cert Exp Date 5/12/2021 Co-Inspectors Signature HP 5 Structural Eval (1657) 41 Inspections Performed: Operating Tons (1552) 3 No Utilities (2675) Freq Hrs Date Rep Type 3 Deck Geometry (1658) 1.13 Op RF (1553) 0 Bridge Rails (1684) 24 1.5 9/2012018 Routine 9 Underclearance (1659) 24 Inventory Tons (1555) 0 Transition (1685) Fract Grit 8 Alignment (1661) 0.67 Inv RF (1556) 0 Guardrails (1686) UW 5 Deck Overall (1663) 5 Operating Level (1660) 0 Terminals (1687) Special 5 Superstructure (1671) B Open/Closed (1293) 0.00 Asphalt Depth (2610) Interim 5 Substructure (1676) 8 Waterway (1662) 10.0 Design Curb Ht(2611) UWI 9 Culvert (1678) 7 Scour (1680) 42.0 Bridge Rail Ht (2612) Damage 8 Chan/Protection(1677) N Soundings Flag (2693) 1960 Year Built (1332) PRM Safety N Pier/AbutIProt (1679) Revise Rating (2688) 0 Year Rebuilt (1336) SEC Safety 4 Drain Cond (7664) Photos Flag (2691) Y Subj to NBIS (2614) Condition 1 Drain Status (7665) Measure Clmc (2694) Alpha Span Type: Short Span H Deck Scaling (7666) 9 Sdwk Cond (7673) SG In Depth 5 Scaling Pct (7667) 4 Paint Cond (7674) Geometric 5 Deck Rutting (7669) 8 Approach Cond (7681) 7 Exposed Rebar (7670) 9 Retaining Wall (7682) Sufficiency Rating 51.61 FO 6 IlCurb Cond (7672) 9 Pier Prot (7683) High Risk BMS Elements Element Element Description Total Units State 1 State 2 State 3 State 4 12 Concrete Deck 3,277 SF 3,277 0 0 0 35 Concrete Deck Soffit 3,277 SF 3,277 0 0 0 38 Concrete Slab 784 SF 762 0 20 2 92 Steel Welded Girder 565 LF 556 0 9 0 212 Concrete Submerged Pier Wall 32 LF 32 0 0 0 215 Concrete Abutment 66 LF 66 0 0 0 221 Concrete Foundation 2 EA 2 0 0 0 234 Concrete Pier CaptCrossbeam 68 LF 68 0 0 0 311 Moveable Bearing(roller,sliding,etc) 11 EA 0 0 11 0 313 Fixed Bearing 5 EA 5 0 0 0 322 Bridge Impact 2 EA 2 0 0 0 330 Metal Bridge Railing 282 LF 267 5 10 0 361 Scour 4 EA 4 0 0 0 408 Steel Sliding Plate 63 LF 0 63 0 0 BRIDGE INSPECTION REPORT Page 2 of 5 Status: Released Printed On: 3/412019 Agency: RENTON CD Guid:88343323-32f8-4875-b977-626bf8bed508 Release Date: 1/28/2019 Program Mgr Roman G.Peralta Br. No. RENTON-05 SID 08584300 Br. Name HOUSER WAY BRIDGE Carrying HOUSER WAY Route On 01169 Mile Post 0.00 Intersecting CEDAR RIVER Route Under Mile Post BMS Elements (Continued) Element Element Description Total Units State 1 State 2 State 3 State 4 901 Red Lead Alkyd Paint System 7,500 SF 3,330. 0 4,150 20 Notes 0 ORIENTATION: Bridge is south to north. South abutment=P1. Cedar River flows east to west. Bronson Way carries one way traffic. 3 GENERAL NOTE: This is a three span bridge over the Cedar River.The main span has 5 lines of steel girders.Approach spans are CIP concrete rigid frame on each end. There is a pedestrian bridge located on the west side and a railroad bridge on the east side. Deploy UBIT from east lane.Take caution of power lines on east side. MONITOR: Riprap is maintained at P2. For scour holes forming at P1,P3,and P4.Expansion joint movement at centerline of bridge P2 and P3. Condition of girder 2A at exterior bottom flange. 11 LOAD RATING: Sargent Engineers,Inc.updated the LFR load rating in 2017 to include the Single-Unit trucks and Emergency Vehicles. The rating indicates load posting EV3. 12 CONCRETE DECK: Span 2 has a concrete deck supported by steel girders. Exposed aggregate throughout With mud ball spalls in west lane span 2 and 3.Random transverse cracks in span 2. 35 CONCRETE DECK SOFFIT: Span 2 has concrete deck soffit exposed between steel girders. Short and scattered transverse leaching cracks in east overhang mid-Span 2,one exposed rebar.10'x 6"x 2"spalled edge along west overhang mid-Span 2. 38 CONCRETE SLAB: Concrete slab is present in approach spans-Spans I and 3. SURFACE:Exposed aggregate throughout with many mud balls spalls.Approximately 6"along the expansion joint concrete is delarrfinated with spalls and patches. SOFFIT:Longitudinal leaching cracks Span 1 &3. Span 1 -concrete is black from camp fire soot-no damage noted. 92 STEEL WELDED GIRDERS: Five lines of girders in span 2. 2A:bottom flange west face(exterior)moss and debris accumulation along flange,rust bloom throughout upper surface of bottom flange,laminar rust with areas of pitting in webs,bot flange,welds and base of stiffeners. Top flange-minor rusting along top interface-See Repairs 213:Minor debris scrapes on the bottom of flange at south end near pier 2. 2E:Supports utility.Dusty accumulation on top of lower flanges of all girders. 12 diaphragms between individual girders-numbered diaphragm 0 through 11,0 is south. 212 CONCRETE SUBMERGED PIER WALLS: Concrete submerged pier hammer head walls at P2 and P3,some graffiti,no structural defects noted. 215 CONCRETE ABUTMENT: Concrete spall at NE corner of P4. Horizontal crack along wall/slab interface P4. 221 CONCRETE FOUNDATION: PI footing exposed 1"face x 6'length. P4 footing is exposed on the east half. BRIDGE INSPECTION REPORT Page 3 of 5 Status:Released Printed On:3/412019 Agency: RENTON CD Guid:88343323-32f8-4875-b977-626bf8bcd508 Release Date: 1/28/2019 Program Mgr. Roman G.Peralta Br.No. RENTON-05 SID 08584300 Br.Name HOUSER WAY BRIDGE Carrying HOUSER WAY Route On 01169 Mile Post 0.00 Intersecting CEDAR RIVER Route Under Mile Post Notes (Continued) 234 PIER CAPS,HAMMERHEADS: Minor dirt and debris with moisture accumulation from expansion joints above at P2&P3. Pigmented sealer flaking off in various locations.The west most pedestal wall on P3 has cracks at the soffit interface. 311 MOVABLE BEARINGS:SLIDING PINTLES Six steel pintle bearings,on short concrete columns;three at P2 and three at P3,support the concrete rigid frame slabs of approach spans. At pier 2 bearings are numbered 2A through 2C(2A is west). Column 213:minor spall east face. At pier 3 columns are numbered 3-1A through 3-1C(3-1A is west). Column 3-1A:Open perimeter crack at column/beam interface with small spalls and rusty rebar on south face. Column 3-1 B:horizontal crack at column/beam interface on south face. MOVABLE BEARINGS:SLIDING PLATE Five sliding plate bearings for the steel girders at P3. Surface rust on faces of exterior steel bearing plates. Bearings have dirt accumulation. 3B at P3 has minor delaminations and spalls near edges of the grout pad. 313 FIXED BEARINGS: At P2-Five fixed bearings for the steel girders are dirty with laminated rust. Bearings are numbered 2-1A through 2-1E (2-1A is west) 322 APPROACH IMPACT: AC is cracking in approaches,but does not increase impact onto structure. 330 BRIDGE RAIL,METAL: Steel rails have numerous areas of peeling paint with freckled rust spots,paint chips,and a few scrapes. Rail support corbels are cracked in spots with some exposed rusty rebar. East rail both North end and South end have been hit and damaged.The east rail is bent outward 7"at the SE comer and 4"at the NE comer. See Repairs. West rail has a segment of railing with bent pickets near north approach. 361 SCOUR,FIELD: Riprap in place at P2,no riprap at P3 or abutments.Streambed is gravel and cobbles.Channel is well defined with no visible scour. P1 and P4 footings are exposed;they are founded on steel piles. 408 EXPANSION JOINTS,STEEL SLIDING PLATE: Sliding plate joints located at Piers 2 and 3 have rninor'D'-spalls and concrete delaminations along the headers of both joints.Joints appear frozen.Joints were measured at the bridge center line: YEAR PIER PIER EMP 2 3 2018 2-1/2-2- 60°F 016 2-3/8" 1-3/4"67"F 2012 2-3/8"1-7/8"70°F 011 -3/8"1-7/8"65"F 009 2-3/8"1-7/8"70"F 008 -3/8"1-7/8"65"F 901 PAINT,RED LEAD: Paint is chipped at many locations in the girder webs and cross frame diaphragms exposing primer and bare metal with spots of corrosion. Chalky oxidation on surface throughout Bottom of girders have widespread speckled rust Peeling paint exterior side of girder 2A at bottom flange. 1660 OPERATING LEVEL NOTE: Structure originally for H15 loading with 33ksi reinforcing steel and concrete strength of 3,600 psi. BRIDGE INSPECTION REPORT Page 4 of 5 Status:Released Printed On:34/2019 Agency: RENTON CD Guid:88343323-32f8-4875-b977-626bf8bcd508 Release Date: 1/28/2019 Program Mgr Roman G.Peralta Br.No. RENTON-05 SID 08584300 Br. Name HOUSER WAY BRIDGE Carrying HOUSER WAY Route On 01169 Mile Post 0.00 Intersecting CEDAR RIVER Route Under Mile Post Notes (Continued) 1671 SUPERSTRUCTURE CONDITION: Rated down due to section loss in welds,bottom flange and stiffeners on girder 2A exterior face. 1676 SUBSTRUCTURE CONDITION: Rated down due to the cracks on the approach span pedestal cracking as the joints and bearing are frozen. 1680 SCOUR,OFFICE: P1 and P4 are founded on steel piles and the footings are exposed. 1685 RAIL,TRANSITION: Guardrail is not installed at the southwest comer. 1686 RAIL,APPROACH GUARDRAIL: Approach guardrail is not installed at the southwest comer. 1687 RAIL,TERMINALS: Rails are not installed at the southwest comer. 2675 UTILITIES: One 18"diameter steel pipe on the east side and two 5"diameter steel pipes between Girders D and E. 2688 REVISE RATING NOTE: Rating updated for conditions noted in 2017 report. 7664 DRAINS: The two east drains,which are on the shy area,are plugged solid with dirt and debris.The west drainss are on the traffic lane and are open and functioning. See Repairs. 7672 CURBS CONCRETE: Curb is broken on the southeast comer of the bridge.Debris and moss accumulating on the curbs. Repairs Repair No Pr R Repair Descriptions Noted Maint Verified 10003 2 B DRAINS: 11/20/2009 Drains are clogged with dirt and debris. All drains need to be cleaned out to function property. 10004 1 B RAIL: 11/20j2009 Remove and replace damaged sections of metal bridge rail on both the southeast and northeast end of the bridge. 10005 1 B TRANSIENT: 9/6/2012 Remove transients from approach spans,thoroughly clean area. 10006 2 B SCOUR: 916/2012 Both abutments and Pier 3 are not protected from scour. Install light loose riprap at P1,P3,and P4 10007 2 B JOINTS: 9/1712014 Demolish steel expansion joint,chip off loose concrete and install new header and sealent. 10008 1 B BEARINGS: 9/1712014 Clean debris and rust,and repaint all bearings. 10009 1 B STEEL GIRDER: 9/21/2016 1/15t2019 Conduct load analysis on steel girders for current condition Laminar and pack rust on Girder 2A bottom flange,welds and stiffeners. Inspections Performed and Resources Required Report Type Date Freg Hrs Insa CertNo Coinsp Note Routine 9/20/2018 24 1.5 MAG G1103 HP Equipment 9/20/2018 48 2.0 MAG G1103 HP BRIDGE INSPECTION REPORT Page 5 of 5 Status:Released Printed On: 3/4/2019 Agency: RENTON CD Guid:88343323-32f8-4875-b977-626bf8bcd508 Release Date: 1/28/2019 Program Mgr. Roman G.Peralta Br. No. RENTON-05 SID 08584300 Br. Name HOUSER WAY BRIDGE Carrying HOUSER WAY Route On 01169 Mile Post 0.00 Intersecting CEDAR RIVER Route Under Mile Post Inspections Performed and Resources Required (Continued) Report lvoe Date fLe-q Hrs Insa CertNo Coinsp Note Resources Hours Min Pref Max Freq Date Need Date Override Notes UBIT 2.00 ANY 60 30 Seattle UB60 deployed off of the east side. Flagging 1.50 LA LA LA Seattle Flaggers Sticky Notes Creator Created Table Reference Notes King 1/16/2019 Report Types check with City for date of posting for EV-3 County/GenneauxM BRIDGE INSPECTION REPORT Page 1 of 12 Status:Released Printed On:314/2019 Agency: RENTON CD Guid:88343323-32f8-4875-b977-626bf8bcd508 Release Date: 1/2812019 Program Mgr. Roman G.Peralta Br. No. RENTON-05 SID 08584300 Br. Name HOUSER WAY BRIDGE Carrying HOUSER WAY Route On 01169 Mile Post 0.00 Intersecting CEDAR RIVER Route Under Mile Post PHOTO RENTON- 05 ELEVATION {root} � �* Photo Type: E-Elevation R e t Orientation: N Date: 9I20/2018 l � Repairs: REMARKS:East elevation " 4 i. S 1 ' 2 t 4 4 PHOTO RENTOW 05 WEST RAIL {root} Photo Type: G-General Orientation: E Date: 9/20/2018 Repairs: REMARKS:Bent pickets on west rail i� "hr 1 BRIDGE INSPECTION REPORT Page 2 of 12 Status:Released Printed On:314/2019 Agency: RENTON CD Guid:88343323-32f8-4875-b977-626bf8bcd508 Release Date: 1/28/2019 Program Mgr, Roman G.Peralta Br. No. RENTON-05 SID 08584300 Br. Name HOUSER WAY BRIDGE Carrying HOUSER WAY Route On 01169 Mile Post 0.00 Intersecting CEDAR RIVER Route Under Mile Post PHOTO RENTOW 05 DECK (root) Photo Type: D-Deck Orientation: W s `: Date: 9/20/2018PWW- s Repairs: REMARKS:Deck and south approach d o 4 PHOTO RENTOW 05 SOUTH APPROACH (root) Photo Type: G-General I Orientation: W " Date: 9/20/2018 _ Repairs: i REMARKS:South approach span - A BRIDGE INSPECTION REPORT Page 3 of 12 Status:Released Printed On:314/2019 Agency: RENTON CD Guid:88343323-32f8-4875-b977-626bf8bcd508 Release Date: 1/28/2019 Program Mgr. Roman G.Peralta Br. No. RENTON-05 SID 08584300 Br.Name HOUSER WAY BRIDGE Carrying HOUSER WAY Route On 01169 Mile Post 0.00 Intersecting CEDAR RIVER Route Under Mile Post PHOTO RENTON- 45 LANE SPACES {root} Photo Type: D-Deck Orientation: S Date: 9/20/2018 Repairs: REMARKS:Mudball spalls in west lane — i - PHOTO RENTON- 05 NORTH APPROACH {root} Photo Type: G-General Orientation: W Date: 9/20/2018 Repairs: REMARKS:North approach span BRIDGE INSPECTION REPORT Page 4 of 12 Status:Released Printed On:314/2019 Agency: RENTON CD Guid:88343323-32f8-4875-b977-626bf8bcd508 Release Date: 1128/2019 Program Mgr. Roman G.Peralta Br. No. RENTON-05 SID 08584300 Br. Name HOUSER WAY BRIDGE Carrying HOUSER WAY Route On 01169 Mile Post 0.00 Intersecting CEDAR RIVER Route Under Mile Post PHOTO RENTON- — �`" .a 05 NE RAIL {root} ' R Photo Type: R-Repair �� •, `, Orientation: SW Date: 9/2 012 01 8 Repairs: 10004 REMARKS:NE rail impact damage Pik ,s may, PHOTO RENTON- Fi 05 WEST 1 OVERHANG w ' {root} 4,Iqt Photo Type: G-General 3 v 1g Orientation: E a � 6✓.t Date: 9/20/2018 Repairs: REMARKS:10'x 6"x 2"spall with exposed rebar along west overhang r ? �� BRIDGE INSPECTION REPORT Page 5 of 12 Status:Released Printed On:314/2019 Agency: RENTON CD Guid:88343323-32f8-4875-b977-626bf8bcd508 Release Date: 1/28/2019 Program Mgr. Roman G.Peralta Br.No. RENTON-05 SID 08584300 Br. Name HOUSER WAY BRIDGE Carrying HOUSER WAY Route On 01169 Mile Post 0.00 Intersecting CEDAR RIVER Route Under Mile Post PHOTO RENTOW 05 SPAN 3 {root} Photo Type: R-Repair Orientation: SE Date: 9/20/2018 Repairs: 10005 REMARKS:Span 3 transient activity x 1T t • 1 1 1 PHOTO RENTON- 05 APPROACH 4 R '� ... SPALL {root} Photo Type: R-Repair Orientation: DN �� Date: 9/20/2018 Repairs: 10007 REMARKS:D spall at south approach `� +•-mot� �4 • f k rN{Q�T t #t �� A'+� tJ-.J+m 'C to..L ry: t��.�. ? 'h BRIDGE INSPECTION REPORT Page 6 of 12 Status: Released Printed On:314/2019 Agency: RENTON CD Guid:88343323-32f8-4875-b977-626bf8bcd508 Release Date: 1/28/2019 Program Mgr.Roman G.Peralta Br. No. RENTON-05 SID 08584300 Br. Name HOUSER WAY BRIDGE Carrying HOUSER WAY Route On 01169 Mile Post 0.00 Intersecting CEDAR RIVER Route Under Mile Post PHOTO RENTOW 05 SPAN I {root} Photo Type: R-Repair Orientation: SE Date: 9/2012018 Repairs: 10005 REMARKS:Span I transient activity F U I 77 PHOTO RENTOW 1) 05 PIER 2(SPAN {root} Photo Type: G-General Orientation: E Date: 9/20/2018 Repairs: REMARKS:Pier 2 south face BRIDGE INSPECTION REPORT Page 7 of 12 Status:Released Printed On:3l412019 Agency: RENTON CD Guid:88343323-32f8-4875-b977-626bf8bcd508 Release Date: 1/28/2019 Program Mgr. Roman G.Perafta Br. No. RENTON-05 SID 08584300 Br.Name HOUSER WAY BRIDGE Carrying HOUSER WAY Route On 01169 Mile Post 0.00 Intersecting CEDAR RIVER Route Under Mile Post PHOTO RENTOW 05 PIER 3 {root} Photo Type: R-Repair 1. Orientation: NE a ' Date: 9/20/2018 Repairs: 10006 REMARKS:Pier 3 b N t t .Q't.� I✓ ' '�.. T'k""'{,A •","s. '�a?Zvi'*-•L t'h� PHOTO RENTON- 05 PIER 2 '} {root} Photo Type: G-General .4 Orientation: SW Date: 9/20/2018 Repairs: REMARKS:Pier 2 mow. K • • 1 1 is : ii • ow, • i l •• •• 111 _ f Cr � +•.K C e�4` r",y 7. RS$'1 n+ � :,yd FI?T t :, t • • i `H '"t bc1''1,kk';''•< �',44 cn" � idl �! s'vt - 1•i „�•ar•.ea.- t t Y x . ' -.?( n .•4:h 1. 1 . a _ �wr ,Y�G BRIDGE INSPECTION REPORT Page 9 of 12 Status:Released Printed On:3/412019 Agency: RENTON CD Guld:88343323-32f8-4875-b977-626bf8bcd508 Release Date: 1/28/2019 Program Mgr. Roman G.Peralta Br. No. RENTON-05 SID 08584300 Br.Name HOUSER WAY BRIDGE Carrying HOUSER WAY Route On 01169 Mile Post 0.00 Intersecting CEDAR RIVER Route Under Mile Post PHOTO RENTOW 05 GIRDER 2A (BOT) VV (root) Photo Type: G-General Orientation: UP Date: 9/20/2018 Repairs: REMARKS:Speckled rust bottom of girder 2A PHOTO RENTOW 05 SPAN 2 {root} Photo Type: G-General Orientation: SW Date: 9/20/2018 Repairs: REMARKS:Span 2 Sz BRIDGE INSPECTION REPORT Page 10 of 12 Status:Released Printed On: 3/4/2019 Agency: RENTON CD Guid:88343323-32f8-4875-b977-626bf8bcd508 Release Date: 1/28/2019 Program Mgr. Roman G.Peralta Br.No. RENTON-05 SID 08584300 Br. Name HOUSER WAY BRIDGE Carrying HOUSER WAY Route On 01169 Mile Post 0.00 Intersecting CEDAR RIVER Route Under Mile Post PHOTO RENTOW _ 05 BEARING 3B {root} t . Photo Type: R-Repair z Orientation: SW low Date: 9/20/2018 Repairs: 10008 REMARKS:Delaminated and spalled •. - grout pad at bearing 3B PHOTO RENTON- 05 COLUMN @ ` d PIER 3 {root} Photo Type: G-General Orientation: UP Date: 9/20/2018 s Repairs:REMARKS:Column 3-1A crack at column/beam interface i BRIDGE INSPECTION REPORT Page 11 of 12 Status:Released Printed On: 314/2019 Agency: RENTON CD Guid:88343323-32f84875-b977-626bf8bcd508 Release Date: 1/28/2019 Program Mgr. Roman G.Peralta Br.No. RENTON-05 SID 08584300 Br. Name HOUSER WAY BRIDGE Carrying HOUSER WAY Route On 01169 Mile Post 0.00 Intersecting CEDAR RIVER Route Under Mile Post PHOTO RENTON- "' 05 GIRDER 2A . a; - (root) �, r,t« r �►�' ",. y ' Photo Type: R-Repair t►5. 4 4 Orientation: E ' N Date: 9l2012018 ��• .�E Repairs: 10009 ' f REMARKS:Girder 2A rust on bottom flange,welds and stiffeners - T� -r BRIDGE INSPECTION REPORT Page 12 of 12 Status:Released Printed On: 3l412019 Agency: RENTON CD Guid:88343323-32f8-4875-b977-626bf8bcd508 Release Date: 1/28/2019 Program Mgr. Roman G.Peralta Br. No. RENTON-05 SID 08584300 Br. Name HOUSER WAY BRIDGE Carrying HOUSER WAY Route On 01169 Mile Post 0.00 Intersecting CEDAR RIVER Route Under Mile Post Entry Name Folder Name Type Repairs Page PHOTO RENTON-05 ELEVATION {root} E 1 PHOTO RENTON-05 WEST RAIL {root} G 1 PHOTO RENTON-05 DECK {root} D 2 PHOTO RENTON-05 SOUTH{root} (3 2 APPROACH PHOTO RENTON-05 LANE SPALLS {root} D 3 PHOTO RENTON-05 NORTH APPROACH {root} G 3 PHOTO RENTON-05 NE RAIL {root} R 10004 4 PHOTO RENTON-05 WEST OVERHANG {root} G 4 PHOTO RENTON-05 SPAN 3{root} R 10005 5 PHOTO RENTON-05 {root} R 10007 5 APPROACH SPALL PHOTO RENTON-05 SPAN 1{root} R 10005 6 PHOTO RENTON-05 PIER 2(SPAN 1) {root} G 6 PHOTO RENTON-05 PIER 3 {root} R 10006 7 PHOTO RENTON-05 PIER 2 {root} G 7 PHOTO RENTON-05 SE DRAIN {root} R 10003 8 PHOTO RENTON-05 NE DRAIN {root} R 10003 8 PHOTO RENTON-05 {root} G 9 GIRDER 2A(BOT) PHOTO RENTON-05 SPAN 2{root} G 9 PHOTO RENTON-05 BEARING 313 {root} R 10008 10 PHOTO RENTON-05 {root} G 10 COLUMN @ PIER 3 PHOTO RENTON-05 GIRDER 2A {root} R 10009 11 w7VA61119 Washington State WSBIS Local Agency Inventory Report Department of Transportation lated was 2132 late 1266 ini 2023 list 2181 2183 21" 1188 Bridge 10 Structure ID Bridge Number Bridge Name 2City Location5 Latitude Longitude 08584300 RENTON-05 HOUSER WAY BRIDGE 04 04 17 1070 O.11,11 E OF 1-405 17 23 05E 4728'S1.38" 122'12'02.07' 1250 12TA —1 T203 12T8 1286 Iss 1288 ilea t202—a late, Printed SufficiencyRating: Feature Intersected Fadfifi.Carried Region FIPS arreas Date Facilities 3;��019 ED item 2111.101IRD CEDAR RIVER HOUSER WAY NW437 11 57745 3 N B 4 MI [;'; High Pjak — — ists 2348 i318 la. 11. rare Im 1307 1310 1312 13" 1374 1378 13" I= last Im 'an 1390 last 1"1 1397 Year Year Bridge Lane Out 0 Curb C no out Sidewalk SidewalkMin Vert Min Vert Vert Min Let Let Min Let Nm,V. w NH.ru, NneVert go Appr sold Ramat Length NBOLorgeh M""' Span Length On DkV%dth Drool,Verdi Lrdt night Over Lack Under Code Under Right Coda Under Lett m Cirrar Clear Lift Clear 6 RdWy Layout 1960 0 140 110 28.3 31.6 2.0 2,0 18 N 99'99" WOO" N 0,0 N 0,0 1 0 0 0 0 29 102 14iS 1434 1436 249a tA95 1A51 iota LAST toss I"? 'In liar 2410 7479 14M 1,iM 1486 1,184 107 149 14" 13. M8f lose I— 1413 M1 R ADT Tnm, Yearo Forms A13T Faces Linear Rruchorcing LRS LRS Milepost g I'M Aid If - F.hor, - Lane -i ADTYavx u. g. Cl... Clearance Chh"n" H Horizontal HodzorHal Max Vert Crossing Hat, a Real.Number Mistreat % ADT System Bob R.at.# Cie. Direction RomD1r Reverse Rome 1 5 1 01169 0.00 15885 7 2014 22000 2034 4200013201 00 0.00 Y 1169 1 1 0 0 14 N 1 0 28'03' 1 25 17000 2018 2400D 2038 Im 103 1535 late rest, 1641 1340. 1596 leas iMT i6A8 Im — tell ia52 "t"t It. 1656 16. 1506 near 15&I 7585 na, Mein Met. Auer Apin Number Number Neigh op., Open Open Inv Inv Inv I 6. an Brad Boa Me! App, Service Send" De Wand Membrane rigD'ck Wad Rating Room, Rating Rating Rating Raring 9 Border Structure ID red AM Project No Dotage I= 8" 'a a Under Type Surface phowd Design ... Design Material Darv, Spa SP.- On Code Method ran. F.m., Method To. Factor Eveembon 3 02 1 07 1 2 5 5 1 1 0 0 2 1 41 1.13 1 24 0.67 — 2588 2n89 21540 2691 26ft 203 26M 2697 Mae Mae Ists 7832 7833 Tina nuer 7836 rion TOM Nutt RMO Rat IM IM 184T 2853 Main 188T 1811 Vna Iran 1879 inner rY 'a i-,! Ear" Load watertsayl Lenin Broom Co StmaC,,t RdwyCae, EngrCow, TotlCoor, Y EV2 EV3 011 012 "a"imp Rating Prop Imp It g El a Z F 3 F VIdth Par-SF Year 'i kq Zr' -1.47 1.50 1.50 1.21 1.3311.31 1.22 1.251 1.10 0,70 F B U U 5 1 IN F N 2 35 1 140 31 400 868 174 1 694 1736 2014 Y C aide 1100 test 2M9,.P-- Va. Ineeater, Con. Coma,— Inapectlon Va. I..P—, Gdw —res,— Intered- papa I.,,mwr Centel. Cad.apeer,, obi Routine 9120)2018 MAG G1 103 HP Interim Condition Inspecition Fracture Critical In Depth ih.d pan JJ Report Types Special Feature Darilage Geometric Underwater S PRM Safety Info — UW SEO Safety Inventory EXHIBIT G BRIDGE LOAD RATING for CITY OF RENTON PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT Houser Way Bridge Bridge # RENTON-05 SEI Project No. A17110.01 By: C.A. Mallow & J.J. Weiks Original: March 2017 Revision: August 2017 SI*WGENT Sargent Engineers,Inc. 320 Ronlee Ln NW Olympia,WA 98502 • Tel 360 867-9284 Fax 360 867-9318 i Bridge Rating Summary POtv 5'096 PIE Stanip Bridge Name: Houser Way Bridge Bridge Number: RENTON-05. Span Types: 3-Span Bridge: (2)Concrete Approach Spans, (1) Steel Main Span i Bridge Length: 140'-0" Design Load: H15-S12 Rated By: C.A. Mallow i Checked By: J.J.Weiks Date: March 2017 Inspection Report Date 9/21/2016 Substructure Condition 5 Rating Method LFR Deck Condition 5 Overlay Thickness 0" Superstructure Condition 5 Truck RF(INV) RF(OPR) Controlling Point Type 3 0.88 1.47 Conc. Floorbeam, negative moment over support Type 3S2 0.90 1.50 Interior Girder, positive moment near midspan Type 3-3 0.88 1.49 Interior Girder, positive moment near midspan NRL 0.73 1.21 Interior Girder, positive moment near midspan SU4 0.79 1.33 Conc. Floorbeam, negative moment over support SU5 0.78 1.31 Conc. Floorbeam, negative moment over support SU6 0.73 1.22 Conc. Floorbeam, negative moment over support SU7 0.75 1.25 Interior Girder,positive moment near midspan OL-1 0.66 1.10 Conc. Deck, negative moment over support OL-2 0.42 0.70 Interior Girder, positive moment near midspan NBI Rating RF Tons Controlling Point Inventory(HS-20) 0.67 24 Conc.Slab, positive moment near midspan Operating(HS-20) 1.13 41 Conc.Slab, positive moment near midspan Remarks: This load rating updates the rating done by Parametrix in November 2006 to the current LFR standards, adds the NRL and SU trucks,and updates the reinfocing yield strength. The bridge is within one-road-mile of 1-405;therefore, emergency vehicles specified in the FAST Act's Memorandom dated Nov.3,2016 were also rated. Resistance factors used reflect the reported condion of each element. Bridge Rating Summary (Emergency Vehicles) If the structure is within one-road-mile of the National Network of highways,then load rate the following vehicles and post as required. Trucks RF(INV) RF(OPR) Posting Load in TONS Type EV2 0.64 1.08 No posting required Type EV3 0.48 0.80 34 WSBIS Coding Recommendations WSBIS 1550 - Design Load 2 H 15 Operating Rating: WSBIS 1551 - Rating Method 1 Load Factor(LF) reported by tons WSBIS 1552 - Rating Tons 40 Tons Inventory Rating: WSBIS 1554 - Rating Method 1 Load Factor(LF) reported by tons WSBIS 1555 - Rating Tons 24 Tons WSBIS 1660 -Operating Level 5 Posting not recommended Legal and Permit Rating Factors: WSBIS 2587-Type 3 1.47 Posting not Required WSBIS 2588 -Type 3S2 1.50 Posting not Required WSBIS 2589 -Type 3-3 1.49 Posting not Required WSBIS 2590 - NRL 1.21 Posting not Required WSBIS 2591 - SU4 1.33 Posting not Required WSBIS 2592 - SU5 1.31 Posting not Required WSBIS 2593 - SU6 1.22 Posting not Required WSBIS 2594 - SU7 1.25 Posting not Required WSBIS 2595 -OL-1 1.10 WSBIS 2596 - OL-2 0.70 Posting Recommendations: The recommended posting is as follows: Type EV3: 34 Tons i Operating Rating Tons xs2o Maximum Tonnage for HS20 41 Tons 36 TON Configuration: 0 0 0 Vories 1 94' ll O O O z z z TYPE 3 Maximum Tonnage for Type 3 0 0 O 25 TON 37 Tons Configuration: 4' 15' �n Co co Ul c" O O z z z TYPE 3S2 Maximum Tonnage for Type 3S2 36 TON 54 Tons 0 0 0 o��00 Configuration: 4' 22 4'1 11' � Y i J _1 —1 J U J J J J __{ U Ul U UI O ---i ---I --I ----1 Z 00 00 z z z z TYPE 3-3 Maximum Tonnage for 60 Tons 0 40 TON Type 3-3 Configuration: 0 0 00 0 4' 16' 15' 4' 15' i.. J J W O 00 O 00 O Z Z Z Z Z NRL Maximum Tonnage for NRL 48 Tons 7 0 0 000 0 0 0 0 40 TON Configuration: 6 of 4' l/ar. -� � 03 co -1- c� C Yl —i 0 0 0 0 0 O 7 Z 0 CD 7 Z z i Operating Rating Tons OL i Maximum Tonnage for OL 148 53 Tons 0 00 0 TON Configuration: 441 1 12 4 ' 10 ' 0 0 0 0 0 n cn cn Ol z 0 0 0 0 Z Z Z Z 4 OL 2 Maximum Tonnage for OL 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 103.5 TON Configuration: 72 Tons 6' 4' 14' 6' 4'I 16' 6 4' 10' - O O O G G G 0 O cn Cn O Ul Ui O U' U' Z 00 00 00 Z Z Z Z Z Z 0 0 0 0 27 TON Confmurat onnnage for SU4 36 Tons g 4' 4' 10' 11 1 1 cro PO P o cn cn � o 0 0 o z z z z i I SUTON Maximum Tonnage for SU5 0 0;' 4'1 0 o Configuration: 41 Tons 44I4 10 co W -P 0� Ui U1 -i -i -1 O O O O O Z Z Z z sU6 Maximum Tonnage for SU6 42 Tons 0 0 0 0 0 O 34.75 TON Configuration: 4 I4 4 4 10 � 00 (Do � � --� Ui CJi —1 1 V o -, , 00 Z O O Z Z O Z sU7 Maximum Tonnage for SU7 48 Tons 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 38.75 TON Configuration: 4'1 4' 4' 4' 4' 10' -r- co co -A - n O O O O v z Z 0 0 = z j Washington State Load Rating Criteria For Bridges Built prior to October 1, 2010. The Washington State Load Rating Criteria is used for legal loads and overloads in the State of Washington. The full criteria is explained in Chapter 13 of the Bridge Design Manual. A summary of the features of the rating are: l'. The adequacy or inadequacy of a structural element to carry a specified truck load will be indicated by the value of its rating factor(RF); if it is greater than 1.0,the bridge is adequate to carry that truck. Inventory rating level reflects the existing bridge and material conditions with regard to deterioration and loss of section. Load ratings based on the inventory level allow comparisons with the capacity for new structures and, therefore, results in a live load, which can safely utilize an existing structure for a long period of time. Operating rating level describes the maximum permissible live load to which the structure may be subjected for a defined period of time. Allowing unlimited numbers of vehicles to use the bridge at Operating levels, may shorten the life of the bridge. Typically only superstructure elements are rated. If conditions warrant, substructure elements can be rated. Typically Y bridge decks will not require rating unless the deck is p os-tensioned. Bridge e decks with NBI condition of 4 or less may be load rated at the discretion of the engineer. In cases where there is deterioration in a member, the cross section shall be reduced based on the inspection report. For cases where deterioration in members is described in general terms, reduce resistance factors of member by 0.10 for BMS Condition State of 3, and reduce factors by 0.20 for BMS Condition State of 4. For roadway widths between 18'and 20', the number of lanes for legal and permit loads shall correspond to the number of striped lanes on the bridge, and for design trucks one lane is used. For roadway widths between 20' and 24', use two lanes for all trucks. For roadway width greater than 24',the number of lanes shall be equal to the integer of the ratio of the roadway width divided by 12'for all trucks. For overload trucks, a single lane distribution factor shall be used when rating longitudinal members on per member basis and the multiple presence factor shall be divided out when using the LRFR method. In cases where a 3D analysis is performed, or when rating a X-beam, place an overload in one lane and a legal truck in remaining lanes (NRL truck typically controls). Impact for Overloads is based on the structure approach and deck condition. It is a fixed percentage of the live load from 10 to 30 percent. Impact is not applied to timber structures, or buried structures with an adequate depth of fill under the roadway. A reduction factor is applied for multiple lanes loaded. i i Multiple Lane reduction Factors: Number of Loaded Lanes Reduction Factor One or Two 1 Three 0.9 Four or more 0.75 Ultimate Method LFR Resistance factors assuming the member is in good condition: Structure Type Steel Members 1.00 (flexure and shear) Prestressed Concrete 1.00 (positive moment flexure) 0.90 (shear) Post-tensioned, cast-in-place 0.95 (positive moment flexure) 0.90 (shear) Reinforced Concrete 0.90 (flexure) 0.85 (shear) For Prestressed and post-tensioned members, where reinforcing steel is used to resist negative moment, the resistance factors for reinforced concrete section shall be used in the ratings. Inventory Rating: The general equation is: (D(capacity) — 1.3(Deadload) + (prestress) RF - 2.17(Live load)(Impact+ 1.0) Operating Rating: i The general equation is: (D(capacity) — 1.3(Deadload) + (prestress) RF - 1.3(Live load)(Impact+ 1.0) Service Method (LFR) - Prestressed and post tensioned members in positive moment regions, and where post-tensioning is j continuous over the supports, shall also be rated based on allowable stresses at service loads. The lowest rating factor between service and ultimate methods shall be the governing inventory rating. Allowable Stress Method (ASD) - The allowable stress method is applicable to timber structures. Impact is not applied to timber structures. - Allowable stress is increased 33%for Operating ratings. Ur N 00 O (M CO r CO CO N 00 t-� Q U( r LC) '-t M O t� d d r CO M N N T T N T T T T Otf o r O o o O O m Q 0- C C C CZ 0- 0- p C1 CZ C2 C1 CL � C1 � CL � W cn to N W Cn U) U) O in Co cn W C2 ..o N N Q o- N a $ r LO rn N O LO t Lo M r CO co :a o o 0 0 -0 o 1- c rn c? m co 00 (y O o0 00 co co co n E cis ct5 La »� +- cu cis z > O O O O r r O O O O O O > N E E E E O E O O O O O 0 C= O E (u 0 0 E E E � E N > O O O > > > O E O o > E E E E E 0 E E Q T t- CD ',I- CD CO N CO LO CO C) o O o o o E O o i. W co �Y Co 00 co co M N co CDN co E > > > t� ] N > E E :tf '�" G C C '�� > N C CL > •cn cn cn •cn •cn i J C2 p O o 0- o 0 0 0 '� '� '� 'Y "� -0 o is U o m co co C) 00 m 00 co 00 m co Lo co �� o (D (D (D 0 0 0 (D (DW o ', Z C t- co m r � � t-- r— r— Co Co � t U]� LJ i i L L L L I.L. U] u- Q > O O O r O O O O O O O O O Lj Lj O O O U U U O U U U U C C C N N N C C C C C C U U U U U � U � U U c c 'o 00 O O N Cl) 00 LO 'It O M - M r- O M CO N LO O O 00 O /y C? 00 Lq Lq N r,-: Lq C? N r- ti Co O d• Lq d; N M M N N t` O 00 �LL Q r T T T T T T T T O T T Q T T T T T T T T T O T O LU LY Q as Q E E Z .O O co O 00 co c') N Lo CSC N 00 Lo � -00 N 00 O 00 M m 00 Co Lo Co N �t 00 G 00 r off. 00 t- O O 00 tl- CO It CM Co C Co 00 O 00 ti � � � � CO d. Co ct > O T O O O T O O O O O O O > O O O O O O O O O O O O O G C N M C Cl) 00 M M t` Co 00 CS' M LO O N O M coM J �• ti) Co r N N M CO CO O OJ M M OA CO d' N 0? N T N 0 o .J J L�J Q N M N N N M N N N N r M N = >� Cl) Z U) U) U) U) Q Q W W rr Q ~ ~ X O t'- O O LO T O T CO - N t- I W C Lf) N d O t~ Co d m 00 O N > N T r N T T T T O T T ui M M — r - — — O_ O � � a U) c� W � M ti p CV N N N N N N N r T r Cd o f Cb o - O T O 0- r c� 2 � Q co � . 0 O o- Y Q o' 0 0 o � ca r o O o O 0 U) N O T, o LL —Jco E U O O II T p cti Cn M O yO Q Q W T c M 0 o O O N 00 O O O O O CO M O �. E O- Q r (� �-- N d' C CO M d- co M co M co M O O O = � co m p N E C M �t O T T T T T T T O O T T U Z � LJ... > O O co Q N � C O .� C m C Q 0 T N p — O r J a zz0 c°sn cQ U Q N RS Co N 70 cd c E 15 -0 -0 .Q (D = -0 L L 0 M O M CD -t -t d- LO d' O -t 00 N '-- r d' Co 00 m m M m � M m C) 00 •��' C� O O r O CD P' Q. r T T T r T O CD (V C/) J U U Q m Q E c� as a> Q i 0) Q o (KS (V o O t- m co co O O O O M O d' m co O —cou O cz O O C CO 00 m O 00 00 00 00 oD 00 00 CO �t cn U O E O U O C.0 m > O O O O O O O O O O O O Ur O •,>- — > O O cn Q cz N U p a) p C-) Q N O _ co � p M Y O p m N m O 0 N M Z U > C W i C-) O M M J d• LO CO � r N N M o U p (Z c W T N N N o J J > - ca c o E U) 0 J J _ cLZ cn U) U) U) Q Q W W (D � •� � m 0 o p p > -0 CO � a)(D U ' Um0Q o i Reactions P1 Reactions P2 Reactions P3 Reactions P4 Reactions P5 DEAD HS20 T001 77.980 Type 3 T002 54.510 Type 3S2 T003 74.570 Type 3-3 T004 79.590 NRL T005 87.120 SU4 T006 59.230 SU5 T007 67.670 SU6 T008 84.360 I' SU7 T009 84.120 OL1 T010 103.600 OL2 T011 196.850 EV2 T012 62.870 EV3 T013 93.980 EXHIBIT H SA* RGENT Sargent Engineers,Inc. 320 Ronlee Lane NW Olympia,Washington 98502-9241 Tel 360 867-9284 Fax 360 867-9318 www.sargentengineers.com April 1, 2017 Mr. Derek Akesson City of Renton Public Works Department Renton City Hall -5th Floor 1055 South Grady Way Renton, WA 98057-3232 RE: Renton Bridge Program Project No.: A17110.01 Dear Mr. Akesson: We have completed a preliminary seismic evaluation of Houser Way Bridge at your request. The evaluation includes a qualitative screening of the bridge for deficient items. Based on our field observations, review of the existing plans, and preliminary calculations, we determined that there are several deficiencies typical for structures of this type. The deficiencies include but are not limited to inadequate concrete reinforcing, bearing support lengths and transverse restraints for seismic event loadings. Current AASHTO LRFD Seismic Bridge Design standards require a minimum support length of 24" and a minimum shear reinforcement ratio for columns of 0.004. The existing approach span spindles and bearings have a support length of 16.5" and a reinforcement ratio of approximately 0.0003. Therefore, existing spindles do not have the required support width, reinforcing, or transverse restraint in the case of a seismic event. Based on our preliminary seismic evaluation, we recommend the following seismic retrofits to the approach and main spans: 1. Replacement of approach span spindles with a continuous reinforced concrete stem-wall. 2. Widening the pier wall to increase the support width for the new approach span stem-wall supports. 3. Remove existing approach span bearings and replace with elastomeric bearing pads. 4. Install of longitudinal seismic restrainers. 5. Install of transvers restrainers at both the approach spans. Respectfully, O w Sarge t En ineers, Inc. 0 5 096 Craig A. Mallow, PE IONS Project Engineer CAM \\SERVER1 files\17Files\A17110.01 Task 1-3 Renton Bridge Program\RENTON-05_SeismicEvalMemo.docx EXHIBIT I 4a� WATERSHED SCIENCE & ENGINEERING !, P. J� fr Memorandum A 2 549 To: City of Renton, Sargent Engineers 'o ��Gts-tEs' From: Jeff Johnson P.E., Marissa Karpack E.LT slONALE�� Date: April 7, 2017 Re: Scour and Erosion Assessment at Houser Way Bridge over the Cedar River BACKGROUND Watershed Science and Engineering (WSE) was retained by Sargent Engineers to determine if scour and erosion countermeasures should be installed to protect the City of Renton Houser Way Bridge over the Cedar River (City Bridge Number: Renton-05). The City intends to submit an application to the WSDOT Local Agency Bridge Replacement Advisory Committee (BRAG) to seek funding for a variety of repairs to the existing bridge. WSE's assessment will be used to determine if the request should include funding to design and install scour and erosion countermeasures. EXISTING CROSSING The Houser Way Bridge was constructed in 1960. The bridge is supported on two end abutments and two intermediate piers. The abutments are each founded on six eight-inch square steel bearing piles that are specified as 22 feet long. The as-built pile tip elevations are unknown. The two intermediate piers are located in the channel banks and are supported on spread footings that extend approximately 10 feet below the current riverbed thalweg. Bridge piers and abutments are numbered from south to north. The original design drawings (see Appendix 1) do not specify scour or erosion countermeasures; however, rock riprap currently covers the left (south) bank surrounding Pier 2. Design drawings of a scour remediation project at the bridge from 1998 can be seen in Appendix 2. No evidence of the remediation was observed during the field inspection, therefore, it is likely that it was never installed. The Cedar River at Houser Way Bridge is contained in a single stable channel that makes a slight "S" shaped turn as it approaches the crossing (Figure 1). Within this "S-turn" Interstate 405 and a railroad bridge cross the river. Downstream of Houser Way, a pedestrian bridge crosses the river and the river is contained by a series of floodwalls and levees which prevent flooding in downtown Renton. INSPECTION AND MAINTENANCE OBSERVATIONS The most recent bi-annual routine inspection of Houser Way Bridge for the City of Renton occurred in September 2016. The inspection noted that riprap surrounds Pier 2, but Pier 3 and both abutments are unprotected. The inspection also describes the channel as "well defined with no visible scour." The WATERSHED SCIENCE & ENGINEERING • 110 Prefontaine Place 5.Suite S08,Seattle,WA 93104•206-521-3000 inspectors noted that the top of the pile caps are exposed at both abutments and they recommended continued monitoring for scour at the abutments and Pier 3. The bi-annual inspection in September 2012 recommended installation of riprap at both abutments and Pier 3 but did not describe what prompted this recommendation. WSE FIELD OBSERVATIONS WSE traveled to the Houser Way Bridge on March 20th, 2017 to assess the need for scour and erosion countermeasures at the crossing. Upon inspection, it was noted that the sediment at both abutments was primarily depositional, consisting of find sands and silt. These depositional sediments indicate low velocities when water flows between the pier and abutment on both banks. WSE confirmed a portion of the pile cap is exposed at both Abutments 1 and 4 due to minor scour forces associated with flow moving around the adjacent intermediate piers (Picture 1). This scour does not pose a threat to the stability of either abutment and additional significant scour is not expected Piers 2 and 3 are located at the edge of the river channel and are both buried in the river bank. Pier 2 is surrounded by light loose riprap which appears to be in relatively good condition (Pictures 4 and 5). Pier 3 is unprotected except for a few pieces of broken concrete near the nose of the pier (Picture 6). Pier 2 is located on the outside of a bend in the river, while Pier 3 is on the inside. Because of this bend, erosional forces are higher near Pier 2 than at Pier 3, likely explaining why Pier 2 is surrounded by riprap while Pier 3 is not. Because Pier 3 is on the inside of the bend, the river has formed a small point bar within the channel adjacent to the pier. The abutments and piers of Houser Way are sheltered from the main forces of the flow by the upstream railroad bridge.The railroad bridge piers, abutments, and rock riprap bank protection create protrusions that prevent flow from directly impacting the piers and abutments of Houser Way (Pictures 8 and 9). This shelter effect greatly reduces the potential for scour or erosion at the piers and abutments. POTENTIAL IMPACT OF DOWNSTREAM DREDGING The lower mile of the Cedar River was dredged in the both 1998 and 2016. In the three years following the 1998 dredging, a headcut progressed upstream, lowering river bed levels under the Houser Way Bridge by one to two feet. Since then, the river bed has aggraded and reestablished the pre-1998 dredge bed elevations. The river was dredged again in 2016 and a similar headcut is expected to progress upstream; however, Northwest Hydraulic Consultants, the hydraulic engineers responsible for predicting how river bed levels will adjust in response to the 2016 dredging, conclude that river bed levels likely will not change significantly at Houser Way (Figure 2) (Brooks and Rowland 2014). This may be in part due to the fact that the dredge depth in 2016 was less than in 1998. Regardless, even if the bed degrades at Houser Way, it will not pose a threat to the bridge because as shown in Figure 3, the abutment and pier foundations are buried well below expected bed levels. Foundation exposure as a result of migration of the thalweg is unlikely due to the reinforced banks at the railroad bridge. Additionally, the current channel bed is approximately 5 feet higher than the bed at the time of bridge design. Figure 3 compares four cross sections at Houser Way—the original ground line circa-1960, and surveys from 1998, 1999, and 2016. The 1998 survey is prior to headcut migration from the 1998 dredge, whereas the 1999 survey includes the effects of headcut migration. Also shown are the . WATERSHED 2 q SCIENCE & ENGINEERING approximate bottom of pile cap and pile tip elevations for both abutments and the bottom and top of the concrete footings for Piers 2 and 3. SCOUR DEPTH ESTIMATES Houser Way Bridge is not susceptible to significant local pier scour because the piers are located in the banks and are sheltered from the main forces of the flow by the armored protrusions at the upstream railroad crossing. However, because the Cedar River channel narrows as it nears the bridge, there is the potential for contraction scour at the crossing. Contraction scour for the 100-year event was calculated using geometry and flow data from NHC's 2016 sediment survey HEC-RAS model (NHC 2017). The maximum calculated contraction scour is 6 feet which we expect to occur within the area between the location of the current thalweg and the centerline of the channel (Appendix 3). If the calculated 6 feet of scour were to occur it would not threaten the pier foundations (Figure 3). The actual depth of scour at Piers 2 and 3 will be less because they are located landward of the maximum scour area. RECOMMENDATION It is WSE's opinion that scour and erosion currently do not pose a significant risk to the bridge structure and existing countermeasures are adequate. It is, therefore, WSE's opinion that scour and erosion countermeasure improvements are not needed at this time. WATERSHED P a g e 13 `� SCIENCE & ENGINEERING � ♦ � � 'tip. - f f � f i t' s Figure 1:Aerial view of the Houser Way Bridge over the Cedar River.Note the"S"shaped curve in the river beginningjust upstream of 1-40S and terminating at the bridge.Flow is from right to left in photograph(Aerial photo from ESRI). F u .. . ... 1. Picture 1:Viewing Downstream between Abutment 1 and Pier 2.Slight scour visible at the toe of the abutment pile cap. WATE R S H E D N a g e 4 `~ � SCIENCE & ENGINEERING ! Y. 16 10, �4 Picture 2:Left pier looking upstream.Note bank protrusion upstream of the bridge that shelters the pier. - - Picture 3:The Cedar River under Houser Way,looking upstream from Pier 2. 40 k WATERSHED 5 q SCIENCE & ENGINEERING "�9r " �•�'fJirY /It��'s r � r b A_ 00. Picture 4:Viewing upstream to riprap surrounding the downstream end of Pier 2. �~t1 �y h: Picture 5:Viewing downstream along Pier 2. fi 'A, WATERSHED P a g e 6 �� SCIENCE & ENGINEERING �y r COS i Picture 6:Viewing downstream to Pier 3. Note pieces of broken concrete on bank. f t' s t Picture 7:Viewing downstream between Pier 3 and Abutment 4. WATERSHED P a g e 7 SCIENCE & ENGINEERING i 1 40 .;.. , N h * � Picture 8:Viewing upstream between the Abutment 4 and Pier 3. Note the blockage of the entryway by the upstream bank. AL i 1 Picture 9:The heavily reinforced railroad bridge abutment just upstream of the South end of the Houser Way Bridge.This creates an impediment to flow that shelters Abutment 1 and Pier 2 of the Houser Way Bridge. 40 k WATERSHED s q SCIENCE & ENGINEERING 50 v 45 E a a' " 35 •� C I � 6Y L Z 30 N 2,3D0 ft I 25 I I y q1 20 Q sum Lk.EL w Mn.Lk.E1.15.8 51oP�; n., 51�eJp �.� i 15 r_•�' 2,300ft m : x Proposed Dredge Design � I I I -- -Year1 10 I Pivot Medium Term 5 — —Long Term 0 0+00 10+00 20+00 30+00 40+00 K+O0 60+00 70+O0 80+00 90+00 100+00 110+O0 120+00 Station (ft) Figure 2: Predicted Cedar River profiles as a result of headcutting after 2016 dredging(Figure from Brooks and Rowland 2014) WATERSHED P a g e 9 `� SCIENCE & ENGINEERING RENTON-05 HOUSER WAY BRIDGE 60 7D W so 100 1 0 120 10 1a 55 Abutment piles are specified as 8"x8"x22'steel 50 piles.As-built depths are unknown. 45- 40- 35 Bottom Of P of Pile Cepi 340 f .oft Z 30-- 0 ..................... ........................... 20 6.6 ft ........... To of Spread F ting♦ A4 Approx.Rene Max Contra on 18 6 If on Scour in I yr low prox.Range 15 of File Tips — Bottom of Spread F(oling Mom of Spread N oling■ 13.6 ft 13.6 If 10 .............980 AS-BUILTGfL ELEV. —1998 GJL UPSTREAM(N HC SURVEY) STATIONING(FT) . .GA_UPSTREAM(NHG SURVEY) —2016&L UPSTREAM(NHC SURVEY) Figure 3:Channel bed profiles for various years at the upstream face of Houser Way Bridge compared to the bridge foundation elevations(As-Built data courtesy ofthe City of Renton). Viewing Downstream. Renton-05 10 REFERENCES Brooks, P. and E. Rowland. (2014) Transition Zone Analysis — Cedar River Gravel Removal Project. Prepared for Coast and Harbor Engineering. Prepared by Northwest Hydraulic Consultants. Seattle, WA. NHC (2017). Cedar River 2016 Annual Sediment Report. Prepared for the City of Renton. Prepared by Northwest Hydraulic Consultants. Seattle, WA. fi 'A, WATERSHED Page 111 q SCIENCE & ENGINEERING APPENDIX 1: DESIGN DRAWINGS Ab b WATERSHED Page 112 q SCIENCE & ENGINEERING „N 1 tl a li'S it J 4.]Cih<'i h s U T /� r . - LLJ \ l C Monk,y vi h �� uCV �k3v;m h oO�awn, d W �� nhQvvvmg � m� z fall zz 1 P N wv:rvM ;r 1. - All T Z ._d O + v ti o 0 I. .r i J ri?d o I Qm -ft ui IF b f AR$ tv� M1I x p,•f - i. 40 w � tl• � N � O 10 ti fir_ 44 L4 6 aI fir./_ - y91 ro PM Ij ��. � D it N::��➢V n. *:3 90 U Willi, v �{ 4, �. I p r LX ^' VMS � I u,a1S y� ddy. h I - - , � Y - ...'. ... ,�•: . ,f�, `d< ., ,. �, §��'�§� a �-•--� _ - _ e J .. Own m � La * �s NO MIN 'Y a:� r h N f'�`�!!..�r '� s*•n�, - q ,� x m ,aF Px ,,§I us yyP r.^ -------------------------- too, MV m v, E l ILI - y x 0 z �z APPENDIX 2: SCOUR REMEDIATION PLANS fi 'A, WATERSHED Page 113 q SCIENCE & ENGINEERING ' EDGE OF RAILROAD BRIDGE EXTEND RIPSTAP TO MEET LARGE A-11 H I Y.lE APPENDIX 3: CONTRACTION SCOUR CALCULATIONS Scour Calculations-City of Renton Houser Way Bridge HEC-18 Method(Edition 5) river. Cedar River by: MNK bridge no.: Renton-05 date: 4/7/2017 Contraction Scour Calculations Comments: Laursen's Live-Bed Contraction Scour Formula (FHWA 2001, pg. 5.10): 100-yr Q= 12,000 cfs Y1 Q1 Q2 W1 W2 K1 Y2 Ysc (ft) (cfS) (cfs) (ft) (ft) (ft) (ft) 13.68 12,000 12,000 136.7 80.9 0.69 19.6 6.0 Comments: 1. Y1 is the average flow depth in the upstream channel. 2. W1 and W2 are the average channel bottom widths of the upstream and bridge cross-sections respectively. 3. K1=exponent reflecting bed material transport type. K1=0.69 conservative value. fi 'A. WATERSHED Page 14 q SCIENCE & ENGINEERING EXHIBIT J NORTHWEST LABORATORIES Seattle, Incorporated )f ESTABLISHED 1896 Technical Services for. Industry,Commerce,Legal Profession&Insurance Industry 241 South Holden Street e Seattle, WA 98108-4359 - Phone: (206) 763-6252 Fax: (206) 763-3949 9 www.nwlabsl896.com Report To: City of Renton Date: March 9, 2006 Attention: Jason Fritzler Report On: Lead Analysis/Paint Samples Lab No. E79928 SUBMITTED: Two (2) Paint Samples RECEIVED IDENTIFICATION: Houser-Way Bridge Paint Chips MAR 13 2006 #I - North Bridge Rail#2- South Bridge Rail Transportation systems Div. ANALYSIS: (Total Lead Content) The sample was digested in cone. HNO3. The resulting solution was analyzed for lead by means of ICP/AES. "Lead-Containing Paint" is defined by CFR 16 (1986), Prt. 13 03.1, para. (a) when"the lead content (calculated as lead metal) is in excess of 0.06 percent of the weight of the dried paint film". TEST RESULTS: Lead, Pb Content Sample# % By Weigh 1 27.4* 2 22.6* *Note: Both samples are considered lead based. This report applies only to the actual samples tested. Northwest Laboratories does not certify, warrant, or guarantee any products manufactured by others. Samples discarded within thirty (30) days unless otherwise requested in writing by you. NORTI IWEST LABORATORIES, INC. ii�_o . C er�ist 0 1��ff,a�r Simon,-m-, n, C emi nbe EXHIBIT K AGENCy CAG-18-229 ' Washington State Local Agency Agreement Department of Transportation Agency City of Renton CFDA No.20.205 (Catalog or Federal Domestic Assistance) ` Address FFit f'— )1 1 6 q (0Z' 1 Renton City Hall-nth Floor Project No. T J lent S Grady Way LA 9499 Renton,WA 98057 Agreement No. For OSC WSDOT Use Only The Local Agency having complied,or hereby agreeing to comply,with the terms and conditions set forth in(1)Title 23, U.S.Code Highways, (2)the regulations issued pursuant thereto,(3)2 CFR Part 200, (4)the policies and procedures promulgated by the Washington State Department of Transportation,and(5)the federal aid project agreement entered into between the State and Federal Government, relative to the above project,the Washington State Department of Transportation will authorize the Local Agency to proceed on the project by a separate notification.Federal funds which are to be obligated for the project may not exceed the amount shown herein on line r, column 3,without written authority by the State,subject to the approval of the Federal Highway Administration. All project costs not reimbursed by the Federal Government shall be the responsibility of the Local Agency. Project Description Name Houser Way Bridge-Seismic Retrofit and Painting Length MA Termini 150-ft north of the bridge to 150-ft south of the bridge Description of Work BriEeserm,seismic retrofit and painting. 3 UCso(�e2v Project Agreement End Date 42ai7swq->''�( Claiming Indirect Cost Rate Proposed Advertisement Date Yes Z No Estimate of Fundin Type of Work (t) (2) (3) Estimated Total Estimated Agency Estimated Federal Project Funds Funds Funds 6.5 °10 a.A enc $48,000.00 $6,480.00 $41,520.00 b.Other Consultant(s) $570,000.00 $76,950.00 $493,050.00 Federal Aid c.Other Participation d.State $2,000.00 $270.00 $ 1,730.00 Ratio for PE - —--- e.Total PE Cost Estimate a+b+c+d $620,000.00 $83,700.00 $536,300.00 R8igght of Way°f.Agency Federal Aid g.Other Participation h.Other Ratio for RW i.State 0 .Total R/W Cost Estimate f+ +h+i $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 Construction k.Contract 100 °1.Other m.Other Federal Aid n.Other Participation Ratio for CN o.A enc .State q.Total CN Cost Estimate k+l+m+n+o+ ��`� R E $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 r.Tot Pro' ct Cost Estimat ++ "k """"""�n, �'�. $620,000.00 $83,700.00 $536,300.00 Agency Officia = Washingto St a Department f Transportation �r By _ AL - _ By . Title Denis Law,Mayor '; ° �a Director, Local rograms 4�6`,,� Date Executed DEC 2018 DOT Form 1 0 039EST: � � ,��*k Page 1 pRevised 0512015 /'asc; S e t ' m Construction Method of Financing (Check Method Selected) State Ad and Award Method A-Advance Payment-Agency Share of total construction cost(based on contract award) Method B-Withhold from gas tax the Agency's share of total construction coast(line 5, column 2)in the amount of $ at$ per month for months. Local j6'orce or Local Ad and Award •V/Method C-Agency cost incurred with partial reimbursement The Local Agency further stipulates that pursuant to said Title 23, regulations and policies and procedures, and as a condition to payment of the federal funds obligated, it accepts and will comply with the applicable provisions set forth below.Adopted by official action on Resolution/Ordinance No. Provisions I.Scope of Work The Agency shall provide all the work,labor, materials,and services necessary to perform the project which is described and set forth in detail in the"Project Description"and"Type of Work." When the State acts for and on behalf of the Agency,the State shall be deemed an agent of the Agency and shall perform the services described and indicated in"Type of Work"on the face of this agreement,in accordance with plans and specifications as proposed by the Agency and approved by the State and the Federal Highway Administration. When the State acts for the Agency but is not subject to the right of control by the Agency,the State shall have the right to perform the work subject to the ordinary procedures of the State and Federal Highway Administration. It.Delegation of Authority The State is willing to fulfill the responsibilities to the Federal Government by the administration of this project.The Agency agrees that the State shall have the full authority to carry out this administration.The State shall review,process,and approve documents required for federal aid reimbursement in accordance with federal requirements. If the State advertises and awards the contract,the State will further act for the Agency in all matters concerning the project as requested by the Agency. If the Local Agency advertises and awards the project,the State shall review the work to ensure conformity with the approved plans and specifications. III.Project Administration Certain types of work and services shall be provided by the State on this project as requested by the Agency and described in the Type of Work above. In addition,the State will furnish qualified personnel for the supervision and inspection of the work in progress.On Local Agency advertised and awarded projects,the supervision and inspection shall be limited to ensuring all work is in conformance with approved plans,specifications,and federal aid requirements.The salary of such engineer or other supervisor and all other salaries and costs incurred by State forces upon the project will be considered a cost thereof.All costs related to this project incurred by employees of the State in the customary manner on highway payrolls and vouchers shall be charged as costs of the project. IV.Availability of Records All project records in support of all costs incurred and actual expenditures kept by the Agency are to be maintained in accordance with local government accounting procedures prescribed by the Washington State Auditor's Office,the U.S.Department of Transportation,and the Washington State Department of Transportation.The records shall be open to inspection by the State and Federal Government at all reasonable times and shall be retained and made available for such inspection for a period of not less than three years from the final payment of any federal aid funds to the Agency.Copies of said records shall be furnished to the State and/or Federal Government upon request. V.Compliance with Provisions The Agency shall not incur any federal aid participation costs on any classification of work on this project until authorized in writing by the State for each classification.The classifications of work for projects are: 1.Preliminary engineering. 2. Right of way acquisition. 3. Project construction. Once written authorization is given,the Agency agrees to show continuous progress through monthly billings. Failure to show continuous progress may result the Agency's project becoming inactive,as described in 23 CFR 630,and subject to de-obligation of federal aid funds and/or agreement closure. If right of way acquisition,or actual construction of the road for which preliminary engineering is undertaken is not started by the close of the tenth fiscal year following the fiscal year in which preliminary engineering phase was authorized,the Agency will repay to the State the sum or sums of federal funds paid to the Agency under the terms of this agreement(see Section IX). If actual construction of the road for which right of way has been purchased is not started by the close of the tenth fiscal year following the fiscal year in which the right of way phase was authorized,the Agency will repay to the State the sum or sums of federal 8uu0 ddS i 1 40 to$y Agency under the terms of this agreement(see Section IX). page 2 Revised 05/2015 The Agency agrees that all stages of construction necessary to provide the initially planned complete facility within the limits of this project will conform to at least the minimum values set by approved statewide design standards applicable to this class of highways, even though such additional work is financed without federal aid participation. The Agency agrees that on federal aid highway construction projects,the current federal aid regulations which apply to liquidated damages relative to the basis of federal participation in the project cost shall be applicable in the event the contractor fails to complete the contract within the contract time. VI.Payment and Partial Reimbursement The total cost of the project,including all review and engineering costs and other expenses of the State,is to be paid by the Agency and by the Federal Government. Federal funding shall be in accordance with the Federal Transportation Act,as amended,2 CFR Part 200.The State shall not be ultimately responsible for any of the costs of the project.The Agency shall be ultimately responsible for all costs associated with the project which are not reimbursed by the Federal Government. Nothing in this agreement shall be construed as a promise by the State as to the amount or nature of federal participation in this project. The Agency shall bill the state for federal aid project costs incurred in conformity with applicable federal and state laws.The agency shall minimize the time elapsed between receipt of federal aid funds and subsequent payment of incurred costs. Expenditures by the Local Agency for maintenance,general administration,supervision,and other overhead shall not be eligible for federal participation unless a current indirect cost plan has been prepared in accordance with the regulations outlined in 2 CFR Part 200-Uniform Admin Requirements,Cost Principles and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards,and retained for audit. The State will pay for State incurred costs on the project. Following payment,the State shall bill the Federal Government for reimbursement of those costs eligible for federal participation to the extent that such costs are attributable and properly allocable to this project.The State shall bill the Agency for that portion of State costs which were not reimbursed by the Federal Government(see Section IX). 1. Project Construction Costs Project construction financing will be accomplished by one of the three methods as indicated in this agreement. Method A—The Agency will place with the State,within(20)days after the execution of the construction contract,an advance in the amount of the Agency's share of the total construction cost based on the contract award.The State will notify the Agency of the exact amount to be deposited with the State.The State will pay all costs incurred under the contract upon presentation of progress billings from the contractor.Following such payments,the State will submit a billing to the Federal Government for the federal aid participation share of the cost.When the project is substantially completed and final actual costs of the project can be determined,the State will present the Agency with a final billing showing the amount due the State or the amount due the Agency.This billing will be cleared by either a payment from the Agency to the State or by a refund from the State to the Agency. Method B—The Agency's share of the total construction cost as shown on the face of this agreement shall be withheld from its monthly fuel tax allotments.The face of this agreement establishes the months in which the withholding shall take place and the exact amount to be withheld each month.The extent of withholding will be confirmed by letter from the State at the time of contract award. Upon receipt of progress billings from the contractor,the State will submit such billings to the Federal Government for payment of its participating portion of such billings. Method C—The Agency may submit vouchers to the State in the format prescribed by the State, in duplicate,not more than once per month for those costs eligible for Federal participation to the extent that such costs are directly attributable and properly allocable to this project.Expenditures by the Local Agency for maintenance, general administration,supervision,and other overhead shall not be eligible for Federal participation unless claimed under a previously approved indirect cost plan. The State shall reimburse the Agency for the Federal share of eligible project costs up to the amount shown on the face of this agreement.At the time of audit,the Agency will provide documentation of all costs incurred on the project.The State shall bill the Agency for all costs incurred by the State relative to the project.The State shall also bill the Agency for the federal funds paid by the State to the Agency for project costs which are subsequently determined to be ineligible for federal participation(see Section IX). VII.Audit of Federal Consultant Contracts The Agency, if services of a consultant are required,shall be responsible for audit of the consultant's records to determine eligible federal aid costs on the project.The report of said audit shall be in the Agency's files and made available to the State and the Federal Government. An audit shall be conducted by the WSDOT Internal Audit Office in accordance with generally accepted governmental auditing standards as issued by the United States General Accounting Office by the Comptroller General of the United States;WSDOT Manual M 27-50,Consultant Authorization,Selection,and Agreement Administration;memoranda of understanding between WSDOT and FHWA;and 2 CFR Part 200.501 -Audit Requirements. If upon audit it is found that overpayment or participation of federal money in ineligible items of cost has occurred,the Agency shall reimburse the State for the amount of such overpayment or excess participation(see Section IX). Vill.Single Audit Act The Agency,as a subrecipient of federal funds,shall adhere to the federal regulations outlined in 2 CFR Part 200.501 as well as all applicable federal and state statutes and regulations.A subrecipient who expends$750,000 or more in federal awards from all sources during a given fiscal year shall have a single or program-specific audit performed for that year in accordance with the provisions of 2 CFR Part 200.501. Upon conclusion of the audit,the Agency shall be responsible for ensuring that a copy of the report is transmitted promptly to the State. DOT Form 140-039 Page 3 Revised 05t2015 IXPmyinentofBilling The Agency agrees that if payment or arrangement for payment of any of the State's billing relative to the project(e.g.,State force work,project cancellation,overpayment,cost ineligible for federal participation,etc.)is not made to the State within 45 days after the Agency has been billed,the State shall effect reimbursement of the total sum due from the regular monthly fuel tax allotments to the Agency from the Motor Vehicle Fund. No additional Federal project funding will be approved until full payment is received unless otherwise directed by the Director,Local Programs. Project Agreement End Date-This date is based on your projects Period of Performance(2 CFR Part 200.309). Any costs incurred after the Project Agreement End Date are NOT eligible for federal reimbursement.All eligible costs incurred prior to the Project Agreement End Date must be submitted for reimbursement within 90 days after the Project Agreement End Date orthey become ineligible for federal reimbursement. X.Traffic Control,Signing,Marking,and Roadway Maintenance The Agency will not permit any changes to be made in the provisions for parking regulations and traffic control on this project without prior approval of the State and Federal Highway Administration.The Agency will not install or permit to be installed any signs, signals,or markings not in conformance with the standards approved by the Federal Highway Administration and MUTCD.The Agency will,at its own expense,maintain the improvement covered by this agreement. XI.Indemnity The Agency shall hold the Federal Government and the State harmless from and shall process and defend at its own expense all claims,demands,or suits,whether at law or equity brought against the Agency,State,or Federal Government,arising from the Agency's execution,performance,or failure to perform any of the provisions of this agreement,or of any other agreement or contract connected with this agreement,or arising by reason of the participation of the State or Federal Government in the project,PROVIDED, nothing herein shall require the Agency to reimburse the State or the Federal Government for damages arising out of bodily injury to persons or damage to property caused by or resulting from the sole negligence of the Federal Government or the State. XU.Nondiscrimination Provision No liability shall attach to the State or Federal Government except as expressly provided herein. The Agency shall not discriminate on the basis of race,color,national origin,or sex in the award and performance of any USDOT- assistedcontneoiand/oraQmementorintheadminintnahonufdoDBEpmgnomor the requirements of48CFR Part 2O.The Agency shall take all necessary and reasonable steps under 49 CFR Part 26 to ensure nondiscrimination in the award and administration of USDOT-assisted contracts and agreements.The WSDOT's DBE program,as required by 49 CFR Part 26 and as approved by USDOT, is incorporated by reference in this agreement. Implementation of this program is a legal obligation and failure to carry out its terms shall be treated as a violation of this agreement.Upon notification to the Agency of its failure to carry out its approved program,the Department may impose sanctions as provided for under Part 26 and may, in appropriate cases,refer the matter for enforcement under 18U.&C. 1OO1 and/or the Program Fraud Civil Remedies Act of1SO8(31U.S.C.38U1eteeql. The Agency hereby agrees that it will incorporate or cause to be incorporated into any contract for construction work,or modification thereof,as defined in the rules and regulations of the Secretary of Labor in 41 CFR Chapter 60,which is paid for in whole or in part with funds obtained from the Federal Government or borrowed on the credit of the Federal Government pursuant toa grant,contract, loan, insurance,or guarantee or understanding pursuant to any federal program involving such grant,contract,loan, insurance,or guarantee, the required contract provisions for Federal-Aid Contracts(FHWA 1273),located in Chapter 44 of the Local Agency Guidelines. The Agency further agrees that it will be bound by the above equal opportunity clause with respect to its own employment practices when it participates in federally assisted construction work: Provided,that if the applicant oo participating ioa State orLocal Government,the above equal opportunity clause is not applicable to any agency,instrumentality,or subdivision of such government which does not participate in work onor under the contract. The Agency also agrees: (1)To assist and cooperate actively with the State in obtaining the compliance of contractors and subcontractors with the equal opportunity clause and rules,regulations,and relevant orders of the Secretary of Labor. (2)To furnish the State such information as it may require for the supervision of such compliance and that it will otherwise assist the State in the discharge of its primary responsibility for securing compliance. (3)To refrain from entering into any contract or contract modification subject to Executive Order 11246 of September 24, 1965,with a contractor debarred from,or who has not demonstrated eligibility for,government contracts and federally assisted construction contracts pursuant omthe Executive Order. (4)To carry out such sanctions and penalties for violation of the equal opportunity clause as may be imposed upon contractors and subcontractors by the State, Federal Highway Administration,or the Secretary of Labor pursuant to Part 11,subpart D of the Executive Order. In addition,the Agency agrees that ifit fails or refuses to comply with these undertakings,the State may take any or all of the following actions: (a)Cancel,terminate,or suspend this agreement in whole orinpart; (b)Refrain from extending any further assistance to the Agency under the program with respect to which the failure or refusal occurred until satisfactory assurance of future compliance has been received from the Agency;and (c)Refer the case to the Department of Justice for appropriate legal proceedings. DOT Form 1«o'000 Page Revioeuoa/2o1e XIII.Liquidated Damages The Agency hereby agrees that the liquidated damages provisions of 23 CFR Part 635,Subpart 127, as supplemented,relative to the amount of Federal participation in the project cost,shall be applicable in the event the contractor fails to complete the contract within the contract time.Failure to include liquidated damages provision will not relieve the Agency from reduction of federal participation in accordance with this paragraph. XIV.Termination for Public Convenience The Secretary of the Washington State Department of Transportation may terminate the contract in whole,or from time to time in part,whenever: (1)The requisite federal funding becomes unavailable through failure of appropriation or otherwise. (2)The contractor is prevented from proceeding with the work as a direct result of an Executive Order of the President with respect to the prosecution of war or in the interest of national defense,or an Executive Order of the President or Governor of the State with respect to the preservation of energy resources. (3)The contractor is prevented from proceeding with the work by reason of a preliminary,special,or permanent restraining order of a court of competent jurisdiction where the issuance of such order is primarily caused by the acts or omissions of persons or agencies other than the contractor. (4)The Secretary is notified by the Federal Highway Administration that the project is inactive. (5)The Secretary determines that such termination is in the best interests of the State. XV.Venue for Claims and/or Causes of Action For the convenience of the parties to this contract, it is agreed that any claims and/or causes of action which the Local Agency has against the State of Washington,growing out of this contract or the project with which it is concerned,shall be brought only in the Superior Court for Thurston County. XVI.Certification Regarding the Restrictions of the Use of Federal Funds for Lobbying The approving authority certifies,to the best of his or her knowledge and belief,that: (1)No federal appropriated funds have been paid or will be paid,by or on behalf of the undersigned,to any person for influencing or attempting to influence an officer or employee of any federal agency,a member of Congress,an officer or employee of Congress,or an employee of a member of Congress in connection with the awarding of any federal contract,the making of any federal grant,the making of any federal loan,the entering into of any cooperative agreement,and the extension,continuation, renewal,amendment, or modification of any federal contract,grant,loan,or cooperative agreement. (2)If any funds other than federal appropriated funds have been paid or will be paid to any person for influencing or attempting to influence an officer or employee of any federal agency,a member of Congress,an officer or employee of Congress,or an employee of a member of Congress in connection with this federal contract,grant,loan,or cooperative agreement,the undersigned shall complete and submit the Standard Form-LLL,"Disclosure Form to Report Lobbying,"in accordance with its instructions. (3)The undersigned shall require that the language of this certification be included in the award documents for all subawards at all tiers(including subgrants,and contracts and subcontracts under grants,subgrants, loans,and cooperative agreements)which exceed$100,000,and that all such subrecipients shall certify and disclose accordingly. This certification is a material representation of fact upon which reliance was placed when this transaction was made or entered into. Submission of this certification as a prerequisite for making or entering into this transaction imposed by Section 1352,Title 31, U.S. Code.Any person who fails to file the required certification shall be subject to a civil penalty of not less than$10,000 and not more than $100,000 for each such failure. XVII.Assurances Local agencies receiving Federal funding from the USDOT or its operating administrations(i.e., Federal Highway Administration, Federal Transit Administration, Federal Aviation Administration)are required to submit a written policy statement,signed by the Agency Executive and addressed to the State,documenting that all programs,activities,and services will be conducted in compliance with Section 504 and the Americans with Disabilities Act(ADA). Additional Provisions DOT Form 140-039 Page 5 Revised 05/2015 Aft ToWashington State Local A enc Federal Aid Department of Transportation g Y Project Prospectus Prefix Route ( } Date 9/21/2018 Federal Aid DUNS Number 092278894 Project Number Local Agency WSDOT Federal Employer 91-6001271 Project Number Use Only Tax ID Number Agency CAAgency Federal Program Title City of Renton ❑✓ Yes ❑No 0 20.205 ❑Other Project Title Start Latitude N 470 28'51.0" Start Longitude W 122' 12'2.9" Houser Way Bridge-Seismic Retrofit and Painting End Latitude N 470 28' 52.0" End Longitude W 122' 12' 1.0" Project Termini From-To Nearest City Name Project Zip Code(+4) 150-ft north of bridge 150-ft south of bridge Renton 98057-5647 Begin Mile Post End Mile Post Length of Project Award Type N/A N/A N/A 0 Local❑Local Forces❑State❑Railroad Route ID Begin Mile Point End Mile Point City Number County Number County Name 1169 NIA N/A 1070 17 King WSDOT Region Legislative District(s) Congressional District(s) Urban Area Number Northwest Region 37 9 1 Total Local Agency Federal Funds Phase Start Phase Estimated Cost Funding Date Nearest Hundred Dollar Nearest Hundred Dollar Nearest Hundred Dollar Month Year P.E. 620,000 83,700 536,300 11 2018 R/W 50,000 6,750 43,250 1 2020 Const. 2,424,450 5,000 2,419,450 3 2021 Total 3,094,450 95,450 2,999,000 Description of Existing Facility (Existing Design and Present Condition) Roadway Width Number of Lanes 28 feet 2 Bridge built in 1960. Main span is 5 steel welded plate girders supporting deck.No records of bridge painting since built. Seismic site class E. Minor seismic retrofit in 1995. Description of Proposed Work Description of Proposed Work(Attach additional sheet(s)if necessary) Bridge preservation, seismic retrofit and painting. Local Agency Contact Person Title Phone Derek Akesson Transportation Project Manager 425-430-7337 Mailing Address City State Zip Code Renton City Hall- 5th Floor, 1055 S Grady Way Renton WA 98057 By Project Prospectus Approving Authority Title Transportation Design Manager DOT Form 140-101 Page 1 Revised 04/2015 Previous Editions Obsolete a e Agency Project Title J691t2112018 City of Renton Houser Way Bridge-Seismic Retrofit and Painting Type of Proposed Work Project Type(Check all that Apply) Roadway Width Number of Lanes R New Construction R Path /Trail 3-R 28 feet 2 FiReconstruction El Pedestrian Facilities F]2-R F] Railroad R Parking F]Other Z Bridge Geometric Design Data Description Through Route Crossroad Z Principal Arterial El Principal Arterial Federal W] Urban Minor Arterial El Urban E:]Minor Arterial Functional [:]Rural Collector Rural R Collector Classification F] NHS El Major Collector NHS E]Major Collector El minor collector El minor collector [:]Local Access [:]Local Access Terrain Flat [:] Roll Mountain F]Flat [:]Roll [:]Mountain Posted Speed 25 mph Design Speed N/A Existing ADT 11,315 Design Year ADT N/A Design Year N/A Design Hourly Volume (DHV) IN/A I Performance of Work Preliminary Engineering Will Be Performed By Others Agency Consultant 99 % I % Construction Will Be Performed By Contract Agency Contractor 100 %, 0 % Environmental Classification class I - Environmental Impact Statement(EIS) Z Class 11 - Categorically Excluded (CE) Project Involves NEPA/SEPA Section 404 Projects Requiring Documentation Interagency Agreement (Documented CE) Class III - Environmental Assessment (EA) F]Project involves NEPA/SEPA Section 404 Interagency Agreements Environmental Considerations In water work, street closure traffic impacts. DOT Form 140-101 Page 2 Revised 04/2015 Previous Editions Obsolete Agency Project Title Date City of Renton Houser Way Bridge-Seismic Retrofit and Painting 9/21/2018 Right of Way ❑No Right of Way Needed ✓❑ Right of Way Needed *All construction required by the 0 No Relocation ❑ Relocation Required contract can be accomplished within the exiting right of way. Utilities Railroad ❑No utility work required ❑✓ No railroad work required ❑All utility work will be completed prior to the start ❑All railroad work will be completed prior to the start of of the construction contract the construction contract ❑✓ All utility work will be completed in coordination ❑All the railroad work will be completed in coordination with the construction contract with the construction contract Description of Utility Relocation or Adjustments and Existing Major Structures Involved in the Project A number of utilities utilize this bridge to cross over the Cedar River. Some permanent adjustments to utility routing and/or temporary relocations may need to occur in order to perform this bridge preservation work. FAA Involvement Is any airport located within 3.2 kilometers (2 miles) of the proposed project?❑✓ Yes ❑No Remarks The Renton Municipal Airport is located within 2 miles of the proposed project. However, this bridge preservation work will not involve construction equipment or activities that affect airport operations. .�` N" This project has been reviewed by the legislative body of the administration agency or agrE3'n ,s;``br designee, and is not inconsistent with the agency' mprehensive for community r ; la'pmt. Agency �' 4 - - By �` '�•, •�'� �' Date 5 Denis Law, Mayor H Re Eo ATTEST: �`�", I . 0�.� DOT Form 140-101 it son A,. Seth Page 3 Revised 04/2015 Previous Editions Obsolete City Clerk