HomeMy WebLinkAboutFinal Agenda Packet
CITY OF RENTON
AGENDA - City Council Regular Meeting
7:00 PM - Monday, September 23, 2019
Council Chambers, 7th Floor, City Hall – 1055 S. Grady Way
1. CALL TO ORDER AND PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE
2. ROLL CALL
3. PROCLAMATION
a) Diaper Need Awareness Week - September 23 - 29, 2019
4. ADMINISTRATIVE REPORT
5. AUDIENCE COMMENTS
• All remarks must be addressed to the Council as a whole, if a response is requested
please provide your name and address, including email address, to the City Clerk to
allow for follow‐up.
• Speakers must sign-up prior to the Council meeting.
• Each speaker is allowed five minutes.
• When recognized, please state your name & city of residence for the record.
NOTICE to all participants: Pursuant to state law, RCW 42.17A.555, campaigning for any
ballot measure or candidate in City Hall and/or during any portion of the council meeting,
including the audience comment portion of the meeting, is PROHIBITED.
6. CONSENT AGENDA
The following items are distributed to Councilmembers in advance for study and review, and
the recommended actions will be accepted in a single motion. Any item may be removed for
further discussion if requested by a Councilmember.
a) Approval of Council Meeting minutes of September 16, 2019.
Council Concur
b) AB - 2468 City Clerk reports receipt of the Closing Letter from the King County Boundary
Review Board (BRB) for the proposed Highlands Meadows Annexation, and recommends
the ordinance effectuating the annexation be adopted.
Council Concur
c) AB - 2462 Community Services Department recommends approval of a 10-year
agreement with the Renton Sister City program, in the amount of $6,000 per year, that
clarifies roles and responsibilities between each agency.
Refer to Community Services Committee
d) AB - 2466 Executive Department requests authorization to hire a Census Program
Manager for an eight-month period, November 1, 2019 - June 30, 2020, in the total
amount of $105,250, to administer a complete count for the upcoming 2020 Census.
Refer to Finance Committee
e) AB - 2464 Transportation Systems Division recommends approval of the Grade Crossing
Signal Installation Agreement for Williams Avenue South at Houser Way South with BNSF
Railway, in the amount of $197,832.
Refer to Transportation (Aviation) Committee
f) AB - 2465 Transportation Systems Division recommends approval of the Grade Crossing
Signal Installation Agreement for Wells Avenue South at Houser Way South with BNSF
Railway, in the amount of $197,832.
Refer to Transportation (Aviation) Committee
g) AB - 2463 Utility Systems Division recommends approval of an interlocal Utility
Construction Agreement UTB 1296 with the Washington State Department of
Transportation, in the amount of $366,500, for the relocation of City utilities and
installation of new communication and signal conduits to accommodate improvements
on I-405.
Refer to Transportation (Aviation) Committee
h) AB - 2461 Utility Systems Division submits CAG-18-120, Falcon Ridge Lift Station and
Force Main Improvements Project, contractor Road Construction Northwest, Inc., and
requests approval of the project and authorization to release retainage in the amount of
$41,779.69 after 60 days, subject to the receipt of all required authorizations.
Council Concur
7. UNFINISHED BUSINESS
Topics listed below were discussed in Council committees during the past week. Those topics
marked with an asterisk (*) may include legislation. Committee reports on any topics may be
held by the Chair if further review is necessary.
a) Finance Committee: Vouchers, Community and Economic Development Reorganization;
Transit-oriented Development Subarea Plan Contract; SCORE Interlocal Agreement
Amendment*; Farmers Market Vendor Fee Reimbursement Request
b) Planning & Development Committee: Adoption of 2019 School Districts Capital Facilities
Plans and Impact Fees
c) Utilities Committee: Downtown Utility Improvement Project - Phase 3 Amendment with
Murraysmith, Inc. (CAG-18-154)
8. LEGISLATION
Ordinances for first reading:
a) Ordinance No. 5931: Highlands Meadows Annexation (See Item 6.b)
b) Ordinance No. 5932: Amended SCORE Interlocal Agreement (See Item 7.a)
9. NEW BUSINESS
(Includes Council Committee agenda topics; visit rentonwa.gov/cityclerk for more
information.)
10. ADJOURNMENT
COMMITTEE OF THE WHOLE MEETING AGENDA
(Preceding Council Meeting)
6:00 p.m. - 7th Floor - Conferencing Center
Hearing assistance devices for use in the Council Chambers are available upon request to the City Clerk
CITY COUNCIL MEETINGS ARE TELEVISED LIVE ON GOVERNMENT ACCESS CHANNEL 21
To view Council Meetings online, please visit rentonwa.gov/councilmeetings
DenisLawMayorWhereas,oneinthreefamiliesexperiencediaperneed,ortheconditionofnothavingasufficientsupplyofcleandiapersforchildren;andI4lñereas,childrengothroughsixto12diaperseachdayduringthetwotothreeyearstheyweardiapers;andW’fiereas,asupplyofdiaperscancost14percentofalow-wagefamily’spost-taxincome,yettherearenogovernmentassistanceprogramsinRentonforthepurchaseorprovisionofdiapers;and‘T4lfiereas,forty-eightpercentoffamiliesinneeddelaychangingadiapertoextendtheirsupply,whilesuchadelayputsinfantsandtoddlersindiscomfort,pain,andatahighrisktodevelopskininfections;and‘T’9fiereas,asupplyofdiapersisgenerallyaneligibilityrequirementforinfantsandtoddlerstoparticipateinchildcareprogramsandqualityearlyeducationprograms;andtj4)/iereas,thepeopleofRentonrecognizethataddressingdiaperneed,whichdisproportionatelyaffectscommunitiesofcolor,createsequitableoutcomes;and‘14)fiereas,RentonisproudtobehometoWestSideBaby,EastsideBabyCorner,andothervariouscommunityorganizationsthatrecognizetheimportanceofdiapersinhelpingprovidestabilityforfamiliesanddistributediaperstofamiliesthroughvariouschannels;5”Iow,therefore,I,DenisLaw,MayoroftheCityofRenton,doherebyproclaimSeptember23—29,2019,tobeDiaperWeec(YlwarenessWeekintheCityofRenton,andIencourageallmembersofthecommunitytotodonategenerouslytodiaperbanks,diaperdrives,andthoseorganizationsthatdistributediaperstofamiliesinneed.InwitnesswhereofIhavehereuntosetmyhandandcausedthesealoftheCityofRentontobeaffixedthis23rddayofSeptember,2019.DenisLaw,MayorCityofRenton,WashingtonProctamationI—RentonCityHall,7thFloorJ055SouthGradyWay,Renton,WA98057.rentonwa.gov4AGENDA ITEM #3. a)
September 16, 2019 REGULAR COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES
CITY OF RENTON
MINUTES ‐ City Council Regular Meeting
7:00 PM ‐ Monday, September 16, 2019
Council Chambers, 7th Floor, City Hall – 1055 S. Grady Way
CALL TO ORDER AND PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE
Mayor Pro Tem Persson called the meeting of the Renton City Council to order at 7:00 PM and
led the Pledge of Allegiance.
ROLL CALL
Councilmembers Present:
Don Persson, Mayor Pro Tem
Randy Corman
Ryan McIrvin
Ruth Pérez
Armondo Pavone
Ed Prince
Councilmembers Absent:
Council Position No. 3 Vacant
ADMINISTRATIVE STAFF PRESENT
Robert Harrison, Chief Administrative Officer
Cheryl Beyer, Senior Assistant City Attorney
Jason Seth, City Clerk
Jennifer Henning, Planning Director
Commander Tracy Wilkinson, Police Department
Fire Marshal Anjela Barton, Renton Regional Fire Authority
PROCLAMATION
a) Mayor's Day of Concern for the Hungry: A proclamation by Mayor Law was read declaring
September 21, 2019 to be Mayor's Day of Concern for the Hungry in the City of Renton,
strongly urging all citizens to join the Emergency Feeding Program and the Salvation Army
Renton Rotary Food Bank in their efforts to nourish those who are hungry.
MOVED BY PRINCE, SECONDED BY PAVONE, COUNCIL CONCUR IN THE
PROCLAMATION. CARRIED.
AGENDA ITEM #6. a)
September 16, 2019 REGULAR COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES
b) Childhood Cancer Awareness Month: A proclamation by Mayor Law was read declaring
September 2019 to be Childhood Cancer Awareness Month in the City of Renton, encouraging
all citizens to join in this special observance. Olivia Gonzales accepted the proclamation with
appreciation.
MOVED BY PRINCE, SECONDED BY MCIRVIN, COUNCIL CONCUR IN THE
PROCLAMATION. CARRIED.
c) National Recovery Month: A proclamation by Mayor Law was read declaring September 2019
to be National Recovery Month in the City of Renton, encouraging all citizens to observe this
month with programs, activities and ceremonies to support this year's Recovery Month
theme, "Join the Voices for Recovery: Invest in Health, Home, Purpose, and Community."
Mario Williams‐Sweet, Hospital and Mental Health Residential Coordinator, accepted the
proclamation with appreciation.
MOVED BY PRINCE, SECONDED BY PAVONE, COUNCIL CONCUR IN THE
PROCLAMATION. CARRIED.
ADMINISTRATIVE REPORT
Chief Administrative Officer Robert Harrison reviewed a written administrative report
summarizing the City’s recent progress towards goals and work programs adopted as part of
its business plan for 2019 and beyond. Items noted were:
The Solid Waste Utility will hold its annual fall recycle event on Saturday, September
21 in the Renton Technical College north parking lot located at NE 6th Place and
Monroe Avenue NE from 9 a.m. to 3 p.m. During this event, non‐perishable food
items will also be collected for the Renton Food Bank. For more information, including
a list of acceptable and unacceptable materials, please visit the City website or
contact the Solid Waste Utility Department.
Preventative street maintenance will continue to impact traffic and result in
occasional street closures.
AUDIENCE COMMENTS
Jason Collins, Renton, suggested placing chain link fencing around the basketball
courts to keep the balls from getting lost. Additionally, he complained about police
officers harassing him.
CONSENT AGENDA
Items listed on the Consent Agenda were adopted with one motion, following the listing.
a) Approval of Council Meeting minutes of August 19, 2019. Council Concur.
b) AB ‐ 2452 City Clerk submitted King County's Certification Letter for August 6, 2019 Primary
Election. The results are as follows: MAYOR ‐ Ruth Pérez, 3,441 votes, 23.76%; Marcie
Maxwell, 3,919 votes, 27.06% NOMINATED; Randy Corman, 3,171 votes, 21.90%; Armondo
Pavone, 3,907 votes, 26.98% NOMINATED; write‐in, 44 votes, .30%. COUNCIL POSITION NO. 3
‐ Valerie O'Halloran, 4,709 votes, 34.66% NOMINATED; Max J. Heller III, 1,210 votes, 8.90%;
Linda M. Smith, 3,232 votes, 23.79%; James Alberson, 4,375 votes, 32.20% NOMINATED;
write‐in, 60 votes, .44%. None; Information Only.
AGENDA ITEM #6. a)
September 16, 2019 REGULAR COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES
c) AB ‐ 2454 City Clerk submitted the 2018 Joint Legislative Audit and Review Committee (JLARC)
Report for 2018. This report summarizes the City's responsiveness to public records requests
for the period January 1, 2018 through December 31, 2018. None; Information Only.
d) AB ‐ 2457 Administrative Services Department recommended adoption of an ordinance
authorizing the execution of an amended and restated Interlocal Agreement relating to the
South Correctional Entity (SCORE); and approval of the City's capital contribution related to
refunding bonds to be issued to refinance the SCORE facility and approving other matters
related thereto. Refer to Finance Committee.
e) AB ‐ 2455 Community & Economic Development Department recommended approval of a
reorganization of the Community and Economic Development Department (CED) as follows:
Permit Center Supervisor (m22) to Permit Services Manager (m28); Construction Inspection
Supervisor (a26) to Assistant Development Engineering Supervisor (m30); Economic
Development Manager (m32) to Community Development & Housing Manager (m33);
Assistant Planner (a16) to Housing Programs Manager (m27). Refer to Finance Committee.
f) AB ‐ 2453 Community & Economic Development Department recommended approval of an
agreement with Makers Architecture and Urban Design, LLP, in the amount of $148,387, to
assist in the development of a transit oriented development subarea plan. Refer to Finance
Committee.
g) AB ‐ 2449 Community & Economic Development Department recommended approval of a
contract with KPG, in the amount of $294,216, for design and engineering work for
construction improvements set forth in the Renton Downtown Civic Core Vision and Action
Plan adopted on January 8, 2018. Council Concur.
h) AB ‐ 2450 Community & Economic Development Department recommended setting October
7, 2019 as a public hearing to receive public input regarding the City's proposed allocation and
use of 2020 Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) funds. Council Concur; Set Public
Hearing on 10/07/2019.
i) AB ‐ 2451 Community & Economic Development Department recommended adoption of the
Renton, Kent, and Issaquah School Districts' updated Capital Facilities plans; and requested
authority to collect each districts' revised impact fees through the end of 2020; Renton ‐
Single‐Family $6,862, Multi‐Family $3,582; Kent ‐ Single‐Family $5,554, Multi‐Family $2,345;
Issaquah ‐ Single‐Family $14,501, Multi‐Family $9,583. Refer to Planning & Development
Committee.
j) AB ‐ 2458 Community Services Department recommended reimbursing Farmers Market
Vendors, Columbia City Bakery and Hot Dame!, in a total amount of $160, in order to more
closely match the pro‐rated business license fee offered to all vendors after July 1 of each
year. Refer to Finance Committee.
k) AB ‐ 2456 Public Works Administration requested authorization to purchase six vehicles for
the Police Department, in an approximate amount of $258,062, using the Washington State
Bid Contract Award 05916; and recommended approval of a $30,000 budget adjustment.
Council Concur.
l) AB ‐ 2447 Utility Systems Division recommended approval of Amendment No. 3, to CAG‐17‐
066, contractor Murraysmith, Inc., in the amount of $973,123, to implement Phase 3, final
engineering and design, of the Downtown Utility Improvement project. Refer to Utilities
Committee.
AGENDA ITEM #6. a)
September 16, 2019 REGULAR COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES
m) AB ‐ 2448 Utility Systems Division submitted CAG‐19‐010, contractor K‐A General
Construction Contractor, LLC, and requested release of the retainage bond after 60 days,
subject to receipt of any required releases from the State. Council Concur.
MOVED BY PRINCE, SECONDED BY CORMAN, COUNCIL CONCUR TO APPROVE THE
CONSENT AGENDA, AS PRESENTED. CARRIED.
UNFINISHED BUSINESS
a) Finance Committee Chair Pavone presented a report concurring in the staff recommendation to
approve the following payments:
1. Accounts Payable – total payment of $13,678,626.93 for vouchers, 82219, 376525‐
376528, 376541‐377004, 377017‐377297; payroll benefit withholding vouchers 6095‐
6112, 376529‐376540, 377005‐377016 and nine wire transfers.
2. Payroll – total payment of $3,314,492.71 for payroll vouchers which includes 1,611 direct
deposits and 61 checks (7/16/19‐7/31/19 and 8/1/19‐8/15/19, 2019 pay periods).
3. Municipal Court – total payment of $14,000.00 for vouchers 017508‐017530.
4. Kidder Mathew – total payment of $34,670.56 for vouchers 5934‐5955
MOVED BY PAVONE, SECONDED BY PRINCE, COUNCIL CONCUR IN THE
COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATION. CARRIED.
b) Finance Committee Chair Pavone presented a report concurring in the staff recommendation to
approve the requested waiver of $2,307.50 in youth athletic registration fees for volunteer
coaches.
MOVED BY PAVONE, SECONDED BY PRINCE, COUNCIL CONCUR IN THE
COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATION. CARRIED.
c) Committee of the Whole Substitute Chair Prince presented a report concurring in the staff
recommendation to:
1. Prepare an ordinance consistent with SHB1406 in order to begin receiving the state share
of the Affordable Housing Credit; and
2. Request the administration continue exploring options for an affordable housing levy
including, but not limited to, a statistically‐valid survey and report the findings to Council
in November 2019.
MOVED BY PRINCE, SECONDED BY PAVONE, COUNCIL CONCUR IN THE
COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATION. CARRIED.
d) Committee of the Whole Substitute Chair Prince presented a report concurring in the staff
recommendation to suspend the rules and leave Council Seat 3, vacated by Carol Ann Witschi,
vacant until such time as the general election for this position is certified. At that time, per RCW
42.12.070, the person elected to that position shall take office immediately and serve the
remainder of the unexpired term.
MOVED BY PRINCE, SECONDED BY CORMAN, COUNCIL CONCUR IN THE
COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATION. CARRIED.
AGENDA ITEM #6. a)
September 16, 2019 REGULAR COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES
NEW BUSINESS
Please see the attached Council Committee Meeting Calendar.
ADJOURNMENT
MOVED BY PRINCE, SECONDED BY CORMAN, COUNCIL ADJOURN. CARRIED. TIME:
7:25 P.M.
Jason A. Seth, CMC, City Clerk
Jason Seth, Recorder
Monday, September 16, 2019
AGENDA ITEM #6. a)
Council Committee Meeting Calendar
September 16, 2019
September 23, 2019 Monday
3:30 PM Finance Committee, Chair Pavone – Council Conference Room
1. Community and Economic Development Reorganization
2. Transit-oriented Development Subarea Plan Contract
3. SCORE Interlocal Agreement
4. Farmers Market Vendor Fee Reimbursement Request
* 5. Vouchers
4:30 PM Planning & Development Committee, Chair Prince – Council Conference Room
1. Docket #14
2. Adoption of 2019 School districts Capital Facilities Plans and Impact Fees
3. Multi-family Property Tax Exemption Update
4. Emerging Issues in CED
5:30 PM Utilities Committee, Chair Pérez – Council Conference Room
1. Downtown Utility Improvement Project, Phase 3 Amendment
2. Emerging Issues in Utilities
6:00 PM Committee of the Whole, Vice Chair Prince – Conferencing Center
1. Renton Regional Fire Authority Update
2. Census 2020 Briefing
3. Emerging Issues
*Added item
Updated 091819
AGENDA ITEM #6. a)
AB - 2468
City Council Regular Meeting - 23 Sep 2019
SUBJECT/TITLE: Proposed Annexation - Highlands Meadows A-18-001
RECOMMENDED ACTION: Council Concur
DEPARTMENT: City Clerk
STAFF CONTACT: Jason Seth, City Clerk
EXT.: 6502
FISCAL IMPACT SUMMARY:
N/A
SUMMARY OF ACTION:
On May 6, 2019 City Council held a public hearing in the matter of the proposed Highlands Meadows
Annexation. Following that public hearing, Council accepted the 60% Direct Petition to Annex and authorized
the Administration to forward a Notice of Intent to the King County Boundary Review Board (BRB). On August
2, 2019 the BRB issued a Closing Letter indicating its approval of the annexation. The next step is for Council to
adopt the ordinance annexing the Highlands Meadows area. In 2007, the area was pre -zoned by Ordinance
#5254.
EXHIBITS:
A. King County Boundary Review Board Closing Letter
B. Ordinance
STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
Adopt the ordinance effectuating the Highlands Meadows annexation.
AGENDA ITEM #6. b)
WashingtonStateBonndaiyReviewBoardforKingCountyYeslerBuilding,400Yes/erWay,Room205,Seattle,WA98104Phone:(206)477-0633.www.kingcounty.gov/brbAugust12,2019AngieMathias,LongRangePlanningManagerDept.ofCommunity&EconomicDevelopmentCityofRenton1055GradyWayRenton,WA98057RE:CLOSNGLETTERFORCOMPLETEDACTION-FileNo.2393—CityofRenton—HighlandMeadowsAnnexationDearMs.Maths:WearewritingtoadviseyouthattheBoundaryReviewBoardhasnowcompletedtherequiredevaluation,asspecifiedinRCW36.93,fortheabove-referencedproposedactionfiledwiththeBoardeffectiveJune18,2019.TheBoundaryReviewBoardalsoprovideda45-daypublicreviewperiod,asprescribedbyRCW36.93.TheBoardreceivednorequestforapublichearingofthisproposedactionduringthepublicreviewperiod.TheBoundaryReviewBoard,therefore,herebydeemsthisproposedactionapprovedeffectiveAugust2,2019.Finalapprovaloftheproposedactionisalsosubjecttothefollowingactions,whereapplicable:1.SewerandWaterDistrictactionsandsomeotheractionsarealsosubjecttoapprovalbytheMetropolitanKingCountyCouncil.IftheCouncilmakeschangestotheproposal,theBoardmaythenberequiredtoholdapublichearing.2.FilingwithKingCountyoffranchiseapplication(s),asrequired,accompaniedbyacopyofthisletter.3.FilingwithKingCountyofpermitapplication(s),asrequired,accompaniedbyacopyofthisletter.[OVER]AGENDA ITEM #6. b)
Page2FlieNo.2393CityofRenton—HighlandMeadowsAnnexation.August12,20194.Fulfillmentofallotherstatutoryrequirementsand/orproceduresspecifiedinyourNoticeofIntention.5.Notificationinwritingofyourintendedeffectivedateofannexation.Thisnotificationshouldbeprovidedasearlyaspossible.Pleasesendthisinformationto:KarenWolf,SectionManagerStrategicPlamiingandPolicySectionKingCountyOfficeofPerformance,StrategyandBudget(OPSB)401FifthAvenue,Suite810Seattle,Washington981046.FilingwithKingCountyCouncilof:(1)onecertifiedcopyoffinalresolutionorordinanceaccomplishingthisproposedaction;and(2)acopyofthisletter.ThisdocumentshouldbefiledwiththeClerkoftheCouncil(Attn:MelaniPedroza),KingCountyCourthouse,Room1200,Seattle,Washington98104.Ifyouhavequestionsorwouldlikeadditionalinformation,pleasecontactourofficeat(206)-477-0633.Sincerely,LenoraBlaumanExecutiveSecretarycc:MelaniPedroza,ClerkoftheCouncilMikeReed,CouncilAdministrationDaveWilson,ElectionsDivisionLindaWilder,DepartmentofAssessmentGenelleWoodbury,WLRDToniCarpenter,KCGISLydiaReynolds-Jones,Manager,ProjectSupportServicesReySugui,KCDOTJaniseFessenden,SeniorDatabaseSpecialist,KingCounty911ProgramDirector,DepartmentofPermittingandEnvironmentalReview(DPER)KarenWolf,OfficeofPerformance,StrategyandBudget(OP$B)SteveHirschey,DepartmentofNaturalResourcesConnieWong,FacilitiesManagementDivision,RealEstateSectionFORM13AGENDA ITEM #6. b)
1
CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON
ORDINANCE NO. ________
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON, ANNEXING CERTAIN
TERRITORY TO THE CITY OF RENTON (HIGHLAND MEADOWS ANNEXATION; FILE
NO. A‐18‐001).
WHEREAS, under the provisions of RCW 35A.14.120, as amended, a written annexation
petition was presented and filed with the City Clerk on or about January 22, 2019 ; and
WHEREAS, prior to the filing and circulation of the petition for annexation to the City of
Renton, pursuant to RCW 35A.14.120, the petitioning parties, comprised of property owners of
not less than ten percent (10%) in value, according to the assessed valuation for general taxation
of the area to be annexed, notified the City Council of their intention to commence the direct
petition for annexation proceedings; and
WHEREAS, after a public hearing, it was determined that the petitioning owners agreed
to accept that portion of the City's Comprehensive Plan as it pertains to the territory including
the applicable zoning regulation relating thereto; and
WHEREAS, the King County Department of Assessments examined and verified the
signatures on the petition for annexation on or about March 6, 2019, and determined that the
signatures represent at least sixty percent (60%) of the assessed value (excluding streets) of the
area to be annexed, as required by RCW 35A.14.120; and
WHEREAS, the Department of Community and Economic Development of the City of
Renton considered and recommended that the City of Renton annex the properties; and
AGENDA ITEM #6. b)
ORDINANCE NO. _______
2
WHEREAS, consistent with RCW 35A.14.130, the City Council set May 6, 2019, in the City
Council Chambers, City Hall, as the time and place for a public hearing on the petition with notice
as required by law; and
WHEREAS, pursuant to notice, the public hearing was held at the time and place specified,
and the City Council considered all matters in connection with the petition and determined that
all legal requirements and procedures applicable to the RCW 35A.14.120 petition method for
annexation have been met; and
WHEREAS, a "Notice of Intention," including all required information for review of the
annexation, was transmitted to the King County Boundary Review Board and approved as of
August 2, 2019;
NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON, DO
ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS:
SECTION I. All requirements of the law in regard to the annexation by petition
method, including the provisions of RCW 35A.14.120, 130, 140, and 150 have been met. It is
further determined that the petition for annexation to the City of Renton of the property and
territory described below is hereby approved and granted; the following described property
being contiguous to the city limits of the City of Renton is hereby annexed to the City of Renton,
and such annexation to be effective on and after the approval, passage, and thirty (30) days after
publication of this ordinance; and on and after said date the property shall constitute a part of
the City of Renton and shall be subject to all its laws and ordinances then and thereafter in force
and effect; the property being described as follows:
AGENDA ITEM #6. b)
ORDINANCE NO. _______
3
See Exhibit “A” attached hereto and made a part hereof as if fully set forth herein
[The proposed annexation area is approximately 12.5 acres and is bounded by
parcel lines. It is bordered by a parcel line near Northeast 4th Street to the north,
158th Avenue Northeast to the east, parcel lines in proximity of Northeast 2nd
Street (if extended), and parcel lines in proximity to 154th Avenue Southeast (if
extended) to the west. The boundaries to the north and west are coterminous
with existing City limits.]
and the owners of the properties within the annexation area shall be subject to the City's
Comprehensive Plan and Zoning Code.
SECTION II. This ordinance shall be effective upon its passage, approval, and thirty (30)
days after publication of a summary of this ordinance in the City’s official newspaper. The
summary shall consist of this ordinance’s title.
A certified copy of this ordinance shall be filed with the King County Council, State of
Washington, and as otherwise provided by law.
PASSED BY THE CITY COUNCIL this _______ day of _____________________, 2019.
Jason A. Seth, City Clerk
APPROVED BY THE MAYOR this _______ day of _____________________, 2019.
Denis Law, Mayor
AGENDA ITEM #6. b)
ORDINANCE NO. _______
4
Approved as to form:
Shane Moloney, City Attorney
Date of Publication:
ORD:2082:9/10/19
AGENDA ITEM #6. b)
ORDINANCE NO. _______
5
EXHIBIT “A”
LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF THE PROPERTY
AGENDA ITEM #6. b)
ORDINANCE NO. _______
6
AGENDA ITEM #6. b)
Renton Highlands Meadows Annexation Area Source, City of Renton, 2018 AGENDA ITEM #6. b)
AB - 2462
City Council Regular Meeting - 23 Sep 2019
SUBJECT/TITLE: Renton Sister City Association Joint Agreement
RECOMMENDED ACTION: Refer to Community Services Committee
DEPARTMENT: Community Services Department
STAFF CONTACT: Sonja Mejlaender, Community Relations & Events
EXT.: 6514
FISCAL IMPACT SUMMARY:
$6,000.00 annually for approved reimbursement.
SUMMARY OF ACTION:
The proposed ten year agreement clarifies the responsibilities and obligations of each agency. The purpose of
this agreement is to support the Renton Sister City program in their service to establish and promote "sister
city" relationships in the spirit of goodwill and cooperation with cities throughout the world. Such
relationships are intended to encourage ed ucational, cultural, recreational, government, business, and
economic and other exchanges.
EXHIBITS:
A. RSCA COR Agreement_2019_FINAL_10 yr trm
STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
Authorize the Mayor and City Clerk to sign an agreement between the City of Renton and the Renton Sister
Cities Association for the amount of $6,000 annually for a term of 10 years.
AGENDA ITEM #6. c)
AGREEMENT BETWEEN CITY OF RENTON AND
THE RENTON SISTER CITIES ASSOCIATION
THIS AGREEMENT, dated for reference purposes only as September 10, 2019, is by and between
the City of Renton (the “City”), a Washington municipal corporation, and the Renton Sister Cities
Association (“RSCA”), a Washington non‐profit corporation. The City and RSCA are referred to
collectively in this Agreement as the “Parties.”
1. Scope: This Agreement defines the respective responsibilities and obligations of the City
and RSCA regarding the sister city program in the City of Renton with Nishiwaki, Japan,
and with Cuautla, Mexico, and programs directly associated with the City’s sister city
program.
2. Purpose: RSCA is organized exclusively to establish and promote “sister city”
relationships in the spirit of goodwill and cooperation with cities throughout the world.
Such relationships are intended to encourage educational, cultural, recreational,
government, business and economic and other exchanges.
3. Roles and Responsibilities of RSCA to the City:
A. RSCA shall perform the following services, which may be in collaboration with
designated City staff as described in Section 4.C, for the benefit of the City and its
residents:
i. Expand citizen understanding of international cultures by promoting an
awareness of cultural diversity;
ii. Encourage opportunities for social and educational enrichment among
international cultures;
iii. Support international humanitarian efforts;
iv. Share expertise in municipal problem‐solving across international cultures;
v. Support official sister city delegation visits including directing, managing,
organizing and coordinating international sister city relations, programs and
activities such as local tours and daily excursions, socials, exhibits, presentations,
AGENDA ITEM #6. c)
PAGE 2 OF 8
communications, art exchanges, and official visits to Renton City Hall and other
City facilities.
Collectively, the services listed in this Section 3.A are the “Sister City Activities.”
B. RSCA shall endeavor to operate as follows:
i. Ensure that its Articles of Incorporation, Bylaws and Policies do not conflict with
any terms of this Agreement.
ii. Adopt and adhere to a professional code of ethics to guide its operations, based
upon the suggestions developed by the Sister Cities International Association.
iii. Retain the right to adopt and modify standard policies and procedures regulating
Sister City Activities, as it deems necessary or appropriate, but not inconsistent
with this Agreement.
iv. Not discriminate regarding any services, membership, staff, or activities to which
this Agreement may apply directly or indirectly through contractual, hiring, or
other arrangements on the grounds of race, color, creed, religion, national origin,
gender, age, or where there is the presence of any sensory, mental, or physical
handicap.
C. RSCA shall, in addition:
i. Prepare and submit to the City an annual report no later than January 31 of each
year that includes a statement of financial condition and a projected annual
budget. This report shall review the operations for the previous year, define the
goals and objectives for the coming year for the Nishiwaki and the Cuautla
programs, list the anticipated Sister City Activities for the coming year for the
Nishiwaki and the Cuautla programs, and describe RSCA’s fundraising activities
planned for the coming year to sustain RSCA as a viable non‐profit organization.
ii. Not use any funds transferred from the City for gifting to individuals; promotional
hosting; purchasing alcohol, tobacco, or contraband; lobbying; furthering the
election or defeat of any candidate for public office; conducting voter
registration drives; supporting any partisan political activity; or pursuing any
activity outside RSCA’s non‐profit mission.
iii. Comply with all applicable laws, ordinances, regulations and codes of any
government having jurisdiction over RSCA or its functions. This section shall apply
not only to RSCA but also to anyone employed or retained by RSCA.
AGENDA ITEM #6. c)
PAGE 3 OF 8
4. Roles and Responsibility of the City to RSCA: The City shall perform the following
services:
A. Assist the RSCA in hosting Sister City Activities by endeavoring to assure
representation of the Mayor’s Office and of the City Council, when international
representative(s) visit our community and by approving delegate status of
representatives of the RSCA when visiting RSCA sponsored international communities.
B. Reimburse RSCA up to a maximum of six thousand dollars ($6,000) per year for RSCA’s
eligible costs toward Sister City Activities. Upon future review of programming and
deliverables by RSCA, the City, at its sole discretion, may consider increasing annual
support by an amendment to this Agreement.
C. Designate one or more City staff members to provide support to RSCA in the provision
of Sister City Activities, as time is available. Notwithstanding the foregoing, City staff
members shall not provide support to RSCA for any activity for which City funds
cannot be used; this includes but is not necessarily limited to the activities listed in
Section 3.C.ii of this Agreement.
D. Authorize the Community Services Administrator, or a designee, to serve as a City
contact for RSCA.
E. Provide printing and mailing services for RSCA’s publications and other marketing
materials for projects furthering the mission and goals of the RSCA that benefit Renton
residents. Notwithstanding the foregoing, the value of such services will not exceed
Five Hundred Dollars ($500) per year.
5. No Future Commitments: The City makes no commitment to support, and assumes no
obligation for future support, of the activity contracted herein except as expressly set
forth in this Agreement.
A. Should anticipated sources of revenue to carry out the terms of this Agreement not
be available to the City, the City will be released from contracted liability with RSCA
for that portion of the Agreement for which funds are not available.
B. In the event the City notifies RSCA that funding is no longer available for all or a
portion of the services to be provided pursuant to this Agreement, RSCA is released,
upon written notification from the City, from any obligation to provide said services.
C. Should funding no longer be available, the City will strive to give RSCA one
hundred eighty (180) days’ notice.
AGENDA ITEM #6. c)
PAGE 4 OF 8
6. Other Participation: This Agreement does not prohibit RSCA from participating with any
other public or private agencies, organizations, and individuals or from accepting other
contributions or gifts.
7. Duration & Termination:
A. This Agreement shall be for a period of ten (10) years beginning on the last date
executed below.
B. This Agreement may be terminated by either party for any cause upon not less than
one hundred and eighty (180) days’ written notice to the other party. Upon receipt
of a termination notice, the City shall cease any and all support including financial
support and in‐kind services at the end of one hundred and eighty (180) days.
8. Record Maintenance: RSCA shall maintain accounts and records, which properly reflect
all direct and indirect costs expended in the performance of this Agreement and retain
such records for as long as may be required by applicable Washington State records
retention laws, but in any event no less than six (6) years after the termination of this
Agreement. RSCA agrees to provide access to and copies of any records related to this
Agreement as required by the City to audit expenditures and charges and/or to comply
with the Washington State Public Records Act (Chapter 42.56 RCW). The provisions of this
section shall survive the expiration or termination of this Agreement.
9. Public Records Compliance: To the full extent the City determines necessary to comply
with the Washington State Public Records Act, RSCA shall make a due diligent search of
all records in its possession or control relating to this Agreement, including, but not
limited to, e‐mail, correspondence, notes, saved telephone messages, recordings, photos,
or drawings and provide them to the City for production. In the event RSCA believes said
records need to be protected from disclosure, it may, at RSCA’s own expense, seek judicial
protection. RSCA shall indemnify, defend, and hold harmless the City for all costs,
including attorneys’ fees, attendant to any claim or litigation related to a Public Records
Act request for which RSCA has responsive records and for which RSCA has withheld
records or information contained therein, or not provided them to the City in a timely
manner. RSCA shall produce for distribution any and all records responsive to the Public
Records Act request in a timely manner, unless those records are protected by court
order. The provisions of this section shall survive the expiration or termination of this
Agreement.
10. Hold Harmless: RSCA agrees to release, indemnify, defend, and hold harmless the City,
elected officials, employees, officers, representatives, and volunteers from any and all
claims, demands, actions, suits, causes of action, arbitrations, mediations, proceedings,
judgments, awards, injuries, damages, liabilities, taxes, losses, fines, fees, penalties,
expenses, attorney’s or attorneys’ fees, costs, and/or litigation expenses to or by any and
AGENDA ITEM #6. c)
PAGE 5 OF 8
all persons or entities, caused by the negligent acts, negligent errors or negligent
omissions of RSCA in its performance of this Agreement or a breach of this Agreement by
RSCA, except for that portion of the claims caused by the City’s sole negligence.
It is further specifically and expressly understood that the indemnification provided in
this Agreement constitute RSCA’s waiver of immunity under the Industrial Insurance Act,
RCW Title 51, solely for the purposes of this indemnification. The Parties have mutually
negotiated and agreed to this waiver. The provisions of this section shall survive the
expiration or termination of this Agreement.
11. City of Renton Business License: RSCA shall obtain a City of Renton Business License prior
to performing any Work and maintain the business license in good standing throughout
the term of this agreement with the City.
12. Insurance: RSCA shall secure and maintain:
A. Commercial general liability insurance in the minimum amounts of $1,000,000 for
each occurrence/$2,000,000 aggregate for the Term of this Agreement.
B. Commercial Automobile Liability for owned, leased, hired or non‐owned, leased, hired
or non‐owned, with minimum limits of $1,000,000 per occurrence combined single
limit, if there will be any use of RSCA’s vehicles on the City’s Premises by or on behalf
of the City, beyond normal commutes.
C. RSCA shall name the City as an Additional Insured on its commercial general liability
policy on a non‐contributory primary basis. The City’s insurance policies shall not be
a source for payment of any RSCA liability, nor shall the maintenance of any insurance
required by this Agreement be construed to limit the liability of RSCA to the coverage
provided by such insurance or otherwise limit the City’s recourse to any remedy
available at law or in equity.
D. Subject to the City’s review and acceptance, a certificate of insurance showing the
proper endorsements, shall be delivered to the City before performing the Work.
E. RSCA shall provide the City with written notice of any policy cancellation, within ten
(10) business days of their receipt of such notice.
13. Notices: Any notice required under this Agreement will be in writing, addressed to the
appropriate party at the address which appears below (as modified in writing from time
to time by such party), and given personally, by registered or certified mail, return receipt
requested, by facsimile or by nationally recognized overnight courier service. Time period
for notices shall be deemed to have commenced upon the date of receipt, EXCEPT
facsimile delivery will be deemed to have commenced on the first business day following
AGENDA ITEM #6. c)
PAGE 6 OF 8
transmission. Email and telephone may be used for purposes of administering the
Agreement, but should not be used to give any formal notice required by the Agreement.
CITY OF RENTON
Sonja Mejlaender
Community Relations & Events Coordinator
1055 South Grady Way
Renton, WA 98057
Phone: (425) 430‐6514
smejlaender@Rentonwa.gov
RSCA
1. RSCA – Nishiwaki, Japan, Committee
Chris Johnson
for the Renton‐Nishiwaki Sister City
Committee
chris5255@gmail.com
519 Hoquiam Ave. NE, Renton, WA., 98059
Phone: (425) 381‐7069
2. RSCA – Cuautla, Mexico, Committee
Jonna Lee Hough
for the Renton‐Cuautla Sister City Committee
jonnaleeh@icloud.com
6208 S. Norfolk, Seattle, WA., 98118
Phone: (206) 725‐1074
14. Other Provisions:
A. Approval Authority. Each individual executing this Agreement on behalf of the City
and RSCA represents and warrants that such individuals are duly authorized to
execute and deliver this Agreement on behalf of the City or RSCA.
B. Amendment and Modification. This Agreement may be amended only by an
instrument in writing, duly executed by both Parties.
C. Governing Law. This Agreement shall be made in and shall be governed by and
interpreted in accordance with the laws of the State of Washington and the City of
Renton. Jurisdiction and venue for any suits filed in connection with this Agreement
shall be in the King County Superior Court for the State of Washington at the Maleng
Regional Justice Center in Kent, King County, Washington, or its replacement or
successor.
D. Joint Drafting Effort. This Agreement shall be considered for all purposes as prepared
by the joint efforts of the Parties and shall not be construed against one party or the
other as a result of the preparation, substitution, submission or other event of
negotiation, drafting or execution.
AGENDA ITEM #6. c)
PAGE 7 OF 8
E. Severability. A court of competent jurisdiction’s determination that any provision or
part of this Agreement is illegal or unenforceable shall not cancel or invalidate the
remainder of this Agreement, which shall remain in full force and effect.
F. Sole and Entire Agreement. This Agreement contains the entire agreement of the
Parties and any representations or understandings, whether oral or written, not
incorporated are excluded.
G. Time is of the Essence. Time is of the essence of this Agreement and each and all of
its provisions in which performance is a factor.
H. Third‐Party Beneficiaries. Nothing in this Agreement is intended to, nor shall be
construed to give any rights or benefits in the Agreement to anyone other than the
Parties, and all duties and responsibilities undertaken pursuant to this Agreement will
be for the sole and exclusive benefit of the Parties and no one else.
I. Working Relationship. RSCA and the City agree that each will collaborate with
respect to the services provided pursuant to this Agreement. Nothing in the
Agreement shall be considered to create the relationship of employer and
employee between the parties. Neither RSCA nor any employee of RSCA shall be
entitled to any benefits accorded City employees by virtue of the services provided
under this Agreement. The City shall not be responsible for withholding or otherwise
deducting Federal Income Tax, Social Security, contributing to the State Industrial
Insurance Program, or otherwise assuming the duties of an employer with respect to
RSCA, or any employees of RSCA. RSCA shall provide the City with sufficient proof of
its 501 (c) (3) non‐profit status, including IRS number and business license, if required.
J. Binding Effect. The Parties each bind themselves, their partners, successors, assigns,
and legal representatives to the other party to this Agreement, and to the partners,
successors, assigns, and legal representatives of such other party with respect to all
covenants of the Agreement.
K. Waivers. All waivers shall be in writing and signed by the waiving party. Either party’s
failure to enforce any provision of this Agreement shall not be a waiver and shall not
prevent either the City or RSCA from enforcing that provision or any other provision
of this Agreement in the future. Waiver of breach of any provision of this Agreement
shall not be deemed to be a waiver of any prior or subsequent breach unless it is
expressly waived in writing.
L. Counterparts. The Parties may execute this Agreement in any number of
counterparts, each of which shall constitute an original, and all of which will together
constitute this one Agreement.
AGENDA ITEM #6. c)
PAGE 8 OF 8
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Parties have voluntarily entered into this Agreement as of the date
last signed by the Parties below.
CITY OF RENTON
By:_____________________________
RENTON SISTER CITIES ASSOCIATION
By:____________________________
Denis Law
Mayor
Roger Richert
RSCA President
_____________________________
Date
_____________________________
Date
Attest
_____________________________
Jason A. Seth
City Clerk
Approved as to Legal Form
_______________________________
Shane Moloney
Renton City Attorney
AGENDA ITEM #6. c)
AB - 2466
City Council Regular Meeting - 23 Sep 2019
SUBJECT/TITLE: Census Program Manager
RECOMMENDED ACTION: Refer to Finance Committee
DEPARTMENT: Executive Department
STAFF CONTACT: Preeti Shridhar, Deputy Public Affairs Administrator
EXT.: x6569
FISCAL IMPACT SUMMARY:
The total cost including benefits for a limited-term, 8-month position based on the M27 salary schedule, using
November 1, 2019 through June 30, 2020:
2019 2020
Salary $15,932 $51,986
Benefits $ 9,048 $28,284
Total $24,980 $80,270
This will bring the total amount to $105,250, which will be budgeted out of the Executive Communications
Fund Balance. Finance will be adding the revision to the mid biennium update.
SUMMARY OF ACTION:
The City of Renton is a diverse and expanding city in need of a complete count for the upcoming 2020
Census. The city is home to many hard-to-count populations. Renton had one of the lowest counts in the
last Census, and we have the largest growth in our minority populations since then.
The City is to set up the infrastructure to enhance a complete count within the community. This will be
done in multiple methods coordinated by the Program Manager. This includes, but i s not limited to:
• A comprehensive outreach and education campaign for all of Renton.
• Working with the Renton Complete Count Committee, community partners, and build partnerships.
• Coordinate the City's efforts with those community based organizations that have been funded by
the State of Washington and King County.
• Working closely with members of the Mayor’s Inclusion Task Force, and communicate with King
County Census External Partnerships.
The State of Washington estimates a loss of $1,914 in annual f ederal dollar funding for a variety of programs
for every person who is not counted. Those funds flow back to the City in a variety of ways, but primarily
through grants. In addition, it can impact representation within our community as the Federal and St ate
legislative seats are drawn based on population counts.
AGENDA ITEM #6. d)
Without the limited staffing, the City will struggle to be successful in enhancing a complete count of our
community.
EXHIBITS:
A. Exhibit 1 – Census Program Manager Job Description
B. Exhibit 2 – Program Manager Work Plan and Schedule
C. Exhibit 3 – George Washington University, Counting for Dollars 2020
STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends that Council authorize the hiring of a Census Program Manager for eight months months from
November 1, 2019 through June 30, 2020 for a total amount of $105,250 using Executive Communications Fund Balance.
AGENDA ITEM #6. d)
CLASSTITLE:CensusProgramManagerExemptJOBSUMMARY:Develop,implement,andadministercensusactivitiesandprogramsfortheCityofRenton.Workrequiresahigh-levelofexpertiseandknowledgetoprovidesupport,education,andoutreachoncensusrelatedprograms.Collaboratewithinternalandexternalstakeholders,andparticipateonmulti-jurisdictionalcommittees.Workisperformedindependentlywithlimitedsupervisionoroversight.SUPERVISION:ReportsTo:DeputyPublicAffairsAdministratorSupervises:NoneJOBDUTIES/RESPONSIBILITIES:EssentialFunctions:•Leaddevelopmentandimplementationofacomprehensivecensusengagementplan.•Plan,organize,andmanagecensusprogramsandactivities.•ManageandoverseeRenton’sCompleteCountCommittee(RCCC).•Collaboratewithexternalagenciesandotherinternaldepartments;buildrelationshipswithtrustedcommunitymessengers.•Represent,andspeak,ontheCityofRenton’sbehalf,makedecisions,andprovideinputoncensusprogramsandactivities.•DevelopRenton-specificcensustoolkitandtargetedmarketingcampaign.•Plananddevelopcommunityoutreachefforts,alongwithtraining/educationalmaterials,toencouragepubliccensusengagementamongRenton’spopulation.•Developcontentanddeliverpresentationstocouncil,otherelectedofficials,regionalcommittees,andotherstakeholders.•Collect,evaluate,andanalyzedatatomeasureimpactofwork;makerecommendationsandadjuststrategiesasneeded.•Developcomprehensivereportsanddatabases;presentandcommunicatedatatostakeholdersinavarietyofformats.•Actasthelead,and/orparticipate,onregional,county,andstatemulti-jurisdictionalcommittees.•Prioritize,reviewwork,andprovidedirectionandtrainingtootheremployeesasitrelatestocensusactivities,projects,andprograms.•Actasprojectmanagerandensuretimelycompletionofprojectsandassignmentsofotherstaffasitrelatestocensusactivities.•Utilizeefficientprocessesandensuresoundinternalcontrols;makerecommendationsforimprovementstoprocessesandprocedures.•Remaincurrentwithrelevanttechnologicaladvancementsasitrelatestothefield.FLSASTATUS:BARGAININGUNIT:PAYRANGE:NonRepresentedM27AGENDA ITEM #6. d)
CensusProgramManager-ContinuedPage2•Maintainregular,reliable,andpunctualattendance.StandardFunctions:•Performotherdutiesasassigned.•Maybeassignedtosupportcriticalcityprioritiesduringdisastersorotheremergencies.EDUCATION,EXPERIENCE,ANDLICENSEREQUIREMENTS:•Bachelor’sdegreeinHumanServices,SocialWork,PublicAdministration,orcloselyrelatedfield.•3yearsofincreasinglyresponsibleexperienceincommunityengagement/organizing,lobbying,advocacy,orcloselyrelatedfield.•Or7yearsofrelevanteducationandexperience.•Experiencemanagingprogramsandprojects,workingcloselywithelectedofficials,andparticipatingonregionalcommitteesishighlydesirable.•Demonstratedcommitmenttoracial,socialandeconomicequityissueshighlydesirable.•Bilingual,specificallySpanishand/orVietnamese,preferred.•Validdriver’slicense.•Successfulpassingofarequiredbackgroundcheck.KNOWLEDGE,SKILLS,ANDABILITIESREQUIREMENTS:•Oralcommunicationandpresentationskills.•Writtencommunicationskills,ensuringcrrectgrammar,spelling,punctuationandvocabulary.•Technicalwritingskills.•Interpersonalskillsusingtact,patience,andcourtesy.•Effective,professional,andpositiveinteractionswithdifficultindividuals.•Understandandfollowdirectiongiven.•Meetschedulesanddeadlines.•Recordkeepinganddataentryskills.•Reportpreparationanddistributionskills.•Researchandanalyticalskills.•Conflictresolutionandproblem-solvingskills.•Decision-makingskills.•Detail-orientedandorganizationskills.•Abilityto:oWorkindependently.oAnalyzecomplexproblems,identifyalternativesolutions,projectconsequencesofproposedactionsandimplementsolutionsinsupportofgoals.oExerciseahighdegreeofindependentjudgmentinproblemsolvinganddecision-making.•Knowledgeof:oLocalandregionalracial,socialandeconomicequityissuesandprograms.oPrinciples,practices,andtechniquesofprogramandprojectmanagement.AGENDA ITEM #6. d)
CensusProgramManager-ContinuedPage3oMunicipalgovernmentpolicies,procedures,andstructure;applicablelocal,stateandfederallaws,codes,regulationsandordinances.WORKENVIRONMENT/PHYSICALDEMANDS:Thefollowingrepresentthephysicaldemandsthatmustbemettosuccessfullyperformtheessentialfunctionsofthisjob:•65%ofworkisperformedinatypicalofficeenvironmentandtheremaining35%involvesmovingthroughoutthecommunity.•Drivingandfieldworkrequired.•Constantlyoperateacomputerandotherofficeequipment.•FrequentcommunicationwithCityemployees,customersandprogramstakeholders.•Nightandweekendmeetingsrequired.Approvedreasonableaccommodationrequestswillbemadetoenableindividualswithdisabilitiestoperformtheessentialfunctionsofthejob.EstablishedDate:May2019Revised:OriginalTitle:AGENDA ITEM #6. d)
‘.1-AGENDA ITEM #6. d)
THEGEORGEWASHINGTONINSTITUTEOFPUBLICPOLICYTHEGEORGEWASHINGTONUNIVERSITY“,..--z-...U:rfc-WASHINGTON,DCCountingforDollars202016LargeFederalAssistanceProgramsthatDistributeFundsonBasisofDecennialCensus-derivedStatistics(FiscalYear2015)WashingtonTotalProgramObligations:$13,722,789,945PerCapita:$1,914(seenoteonproperuse)CFDA#ProgramNameDept.[yRecipientsObligations93.778MedicalAssistanceProgram(Medicaid)HHSGrantsStates$8,484,071,43810.551SupplementalNutritionAssistanceUSDADirectHouse-$1,527,741,099Program(SNAP)Payholds93.774MedicarePartB(SupplementalMedicalHHSDirectProviders$1,053,323,016Insurance)—PhysiciansFeeSchedulePayServices20.205HighwayPlanningandConstructionDOTGrantsStates$663,499,29614.871Section8HousingChoiceVouchersHUDDirectOwners$476,585,000Pay84.010TitleIGrantstoLocalEducationAgenciesEDGrantsLEAs$221,863,79784.027SpecialEducationGrants(IDEA)EDGrantsStates$219,509,83110.555NationalSchoolLunchProgramUSDAGrantsStates$193,566,59693.600HeadStart/EarlyHeadStartHHSGrantsProviders$180,224,53710.557SupplementalNutritionProgramforUSDAGrantsStates$148,442,776Women,Infants,andChildren(WIC)93.767StateChildren’sHealthInsuranceHHSGrantsStates$128,952,000Program(S-CHIP)93.527/HealthCenterPrograms(Community,HHSGrantsProviders$122,044,52993.224Migrant,Homeless,PublicHousing)14.195Section$HousingAssistancePaymentsHUDDirectOwners$93,906,920Program(Project-based)Pay93.596ChildCareandDevelopmentFund-HHSGrantsStates$78,239,000Entitlement93.658FosterCare(TitleIV-E)HHSGrantsStates$71,629,00093.568LowIncomeHomeEnergyAssistanceHHSGrantsStates$59,190,510(LIHEAP)AGENDA ITEM #6. d)
(NotesandFindings:•TheCountingforDollarsProjectwillidentifyallfederalfinancialassistanceprogramsrelyingDecennialCensus-deriveddatatoguidethegeographicdistributionoffunds.•Asaninitialproduct,theprojectispublishingtablesonthedistribution,bystate,ofFY2O1Sfundsfrom16largeCensus-guidedprograms.•ForeveryprogrambuttheNationalSchoolLunchProgram,theequitabledistributionoffundstoastatedependsontheaccuratemeasurementofitspopulationcountandcharacteristics.•Thereisnotastraightlinearrelationshipbetweenstatepopulationcountandfederalfundsflow.Thepercapitafigureallowscross-statecomparisonsoffiscalrelianceoncensus-guidedprograms.Itdoesnotindicatetheamountbywhichfederalfundingincreasesforeachadditionalpersoncounted.(SeeTheLeadershipConferenceEducationFund,“CountingforDollars:WhyItMatters.”)Definitions:•Census-derivedstatistics—federaldatasetsthatareextensionsoforotherwiserelyontheDecennialCensus(listavailableonprolectwebsite)•Census-guidedfinancialassistanceprograms—programsthatrelyonCensus-derivedstatisticstodetermineprogrameligibilityand/orallocatefundstostatesandlocalities•Percapita—totalFY2015obligationsforthe16programsdividedbypopulationasofJuly1,2015(pertheCensusBureau)(Abbreviations:•CFDA—CatalogofFederalDomesticAssistance•USDA—U.S.DepartmentofAgriculture•ED—U.S.DepartmentofEducation•HHS—U.S.DepartmentofHealthandHumanServices•HUD—U.S.DepartmentofHousingandUrbanDevelopment•DOT—U.S.DepartmentofTransportationSources:•USAspending.gov(20.050,84.010,84.027,93.224/93.527,93.568,93.600,93.778)•President’sBudgetRequestforFY2017orprogramagency(10.511,10.555,10.557,14.871,93.596,93.658,93.767)•CenteronBudgetandPolicyPrioritiesf14.195)•CentersforMedicare&Medicaid,HHS(PhysiciansFeeScheduleServicesof93.774)PreparedbyAndrewReamer,ResearchProfessor,GWIPP,withdataanalysisprovidedbySeanMoulton,OpenGovernmentProgramManager,ProjectonGovernmentOversight(POGO)August18,2017AGENDA ITEM #6. d)
THEGEORGEWASHINGTONINSTITUTEOFPUBLICPOLICYTHEGEORGEWASHINGTONUNIVERSITY“,..--z-...U:rfc-WASHINGTON,DCCountingforDollars202016LargeFederalAssistanceProgramsthatDistributeFundsonBasisofDecennialCensus-derivedStatistics(FiscalYear2015)WashingtonTotalProgramObligations:$13,722,789,945PerCapita:$1,914(seenoteonproperuse)CFDA#ProgramNameDept.[yRecipientsObligations93.778MedicalAssistanceProgram(Medicaid)HHSGrantsStates$8,484,071,43810.551SupplementalNutritionAssistanceUSDADirectHouse-$1,527,741,099Program(SNAP)Payholds93.774MedicarePartB(SupplementalMedicalHHSDirectProviders$1,053,323,016Insurance)—PhysiciansFeeSchedulePayServices20.205HighwayPlanningandConstructionDOTGrantsStates$663,499,29614.871Section8HousingChoiceVouchersHUDDirectOwners$476,585,000Pay84.010TitleIGrantstoLocalEducationAgenciesEDGrantsLEAs$221,863,79784.027SpecialEducationGrants(IDEA)EDGrantsStates$219,509,83110.555NationalSchoolLunchProgramUSDAGrantsStates$193,566,59693.600HeadStart/EarlyHeadStartHHSGrantsProviders$180,224,53710.557SupplementalNutritionProgramforUSDAGrantsStates$148,442,776Women,Infants,andChildren(WIC)93.767StateChildren’sHealthInsuranceHHSGrantsStates$128,952,000Program(S-CHIP)93.527/HealthCenterPrograms(Community,HHSGrantsProviders$122,044,52993.224Migrant,Homeless,PublicHousing)14.195Section$HousingAssistancePaymentsHUDDirectOwners$93,906,920Program(Project-based)Pay93.596ChildCareandDevelopmentFund-HHSGrantsStates$78,239,000Entitlement93.658FosterCare(TitleIV-E)HHSGrantsStates$71,629,00093.568LowIncomeHomeEnergyAssistanceHHSGrantsStates$59,190,510(LIHEAP)AGENDA ITEM #6. d)
(NotesandFindings:•TheCountingforDollarsProjectwillidentifyallfederalfinancialassistanceprogramsrelyingDecennialCensus-deriveddatatoguidethegeographicdistributionoffunds.•Asaninitialproduct,theprojectispublishingtablesonthedistribution,bystate,ofFY2O1Sfundsfrom16largeCensus-guidedprograms.•ForeveryprogrambuttheNationalSchoolLunchProgram,theequitabledistributionoffundstoastatedependsontheaccuratemeasurementofitspopulationcountandcharacteristics.•Thereisnotastraightlinearrelationshipbetweenstatepopulationcountandfederalfundsflow.Thepercapitafigureallowscross-statecomparisonsoffiscalrelianceoncensus-guidedprograms.Itdoesnotindicatetheamountbywhichfederalfundingincreasesforeachadditionalpersoncounted.(SeeTheLeadershipConferenceEducationFund,“CountingforDollars:WhyItMatters.”)Definitions:•Census-derivedstatistics—federaldatasetsthatareextensionsoforotherwiserelyontheDecennialCensus(listavailableonprolectwebsite)•Census-guidedfinancialassistanceprograms—programsthatrelyonCensus-derivedstatisticstodetermineprogrameligibilityand/orallocatefundstostatesandlocalities•Percapita—totalFY2015obligationsforthe16programsdividedbypopulationasofJuly1,2015(pertheCensusBureau)(Abbreviations:•CFDA—CatalogofFederalDomesticAssistance•USDA—U.S.DepartmentofAgriculture•ED—U.S.DepartmentofEducation•HHS—U.S.DepartmentofHealthandHumanServices•HUD—U.S.DepartmentofHousingandUrbanDevelopment•DOT—U.S.DepartmentofTransportationSources:•USAspending.gov(20.050,84.010,84.027,93.224/93.527,93.568,93.600,93.778)•President’sBudgetRequestforFY2017orprogramagency(10.511,10.555,10.557,14.871,93.596,93.658,93.767)•CenteronBudgetandPolicyPrioritiesf14.195)•CentersforMedicare&Medicaid,HHS(PhysiciansFeeScheduleServicesof93.774)PreparedbyAndrewReamer,ResearchProfessor,GWIPP,withdataanalysisprovidedbySeanMoulton,OpenGovernmentProgramManager,ProjectonGovernmentOversight(POGO)August18,2017AGENDA ITEM #6. d)
AB - 2464
City Council Regular Meeting - 23 Sep 2019
SUBJECT/TITLE: BNSF Grade Crossing Signal Installation Agreement for Williams
Avenue South at Houser Way South
RECOMMENDED ACTION: Refer to Transportation (Aviation) Committee
DEPARTMENT: Transportation Systems Division
STAFF CONTACT: Keith Woolley, Transportation Project Manager
EXT.: 7318
FISCAL IMPACT SUMMARY:
The estimated cost of this agreement is $197,832. This agreement is budgeted in the Williams Avenue South
and Wells Avenue South Conversion Project account 317.122908.016.595.30.63.001. Please execute the
attached agreement with BNSF.
SUMMARY OF ACTION:
The Williams Avenue South and Wells Avenue South Conversion Project requires the replacement of the BNSF
grade crossing signal equipment at the Williams Avenue South railroad crossing. The existing equipment is
outdated and only accommodates one-way traffic.
The Transportation Systems Division has coordinated with BNSF regarding the design. Due to the nature of
the BNSF spur line and the street network, the new signal equipment will be side-fire without crossing arms.
BNSF performs all work related to their crossing equipment. The attached BNSF Grade Crossing Signal
Installation Agreement establishes that the City will reimburse BNSF for all work related to replacement of the
crossing equipment. The agreement also establishes that the City will reimburse BNSF for any repairs to the
equipment due to damage not caused by BNSF. The attached agreement is also sometimes referred to as a
construction and maintenance agreement, as it establishes cost responsibilities for the construction and
maintenance of the BNSF work and equipment.
EXHIBITS:
A. Agreement
STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
Authorize the Mayor and City Clerk to execute the Grade Crossing Signal Installation Agreement for Williams
Avenue South at Houser Way South with BNSF for the Williams Avenue South and Wells Avenue South
Conversion Project.
AGENDA ITEM #6. e)
AGENDA ITEM #6. e)
AGENDA ITEM #6. e)
AGENDA ITEM #6. e)
AGENDA ITEM #6. e)
AGENDA ITEM #6. e)
AGENDA ITEM #6. e)
3lII$F'
T--—._..——
/7A/Z WA )’
Exhibit “A”
[Insert drzlwingofcrossing hcrc]
7of9
AGENDA ITEM #6. e)
AGENDA ITEM #6. e)
3III$F'’
T---—-————-—/7A‘/L M/Ar
Exhibit “B”
[Insert plans and speci?cations detailing Rai1road’s work]
8of9
AGENDA ITEM #6. e)
cmn.;83_m35mԤmm
rL\vN\.\S“m_qD
méumoz
32¢
m"min
4
1:¢mD1<3U
¥
om:mmup32.3412
u._C§m"zB.m:_am5m32.Bmoi96:.‘hm
zEEz_:.n_EEEisou.0.
»mm3IEoz.zEm;E_cmLU®Z0*.52_mmuour_oLum_ummjox
zmm?mawwas_9.6:A_Om._,ZOUoémmomuézgz??ezaA
Em.ME.98Sept;__m_m.E25528gz?mu?ézo_CmEEmAvEvm4.DL3U:33:m_v6:2mm>.qw:SjH.3"EmEm.:o_Soc_._omLa9.coo:We33mze?mzzoujofzouoz?mamu.
q;zEEm.za:$3_S.E:u69:jd9355m;$3:Aw
Eb\m.3:\w\_\m‘.r,\.m.>\%Icmamuuimo_>mu95:5;
jmma
$8::,m::EmE@
|EHE
mzozmgqiqm
ozE.n_q3E?mzauummgiaSE28
m?xmqd.mDm4.$ZgBqimm
kmmx«§%\$§
xrm?rs-Bo
mS.w.£_:<3S
2.2.5.
».§..__;._:_._Du.._wN.w..wxzaEm“_w._.:%
m,~.§E.3..2«MmEN..1:
6....
$2AVmm;AV:5$3;AV-AV.2
HHmaH
ea
In.z_:.n~_H.:..EEw1%.E
imw.m.K<umqzhmmx
[I
«meow9
65..E%am?imqm
‘L
.?:$m:53E
R?mnxbuobRmiimkmiE?mo)avELm~:ko>\:QT%E.QK:m\mwa
AGENDA ITEM #6. e)
3III§F'
—/‘?/1/A WAY
Exhibit “C”
[INSERT ESTIMATE OF RAlLROAD’S COSTS HERE]
9of9
AGENDA ITEM #6. e)
AGENDA ITEM #6. e)
AGENDA ITEM #6. e)
AB - 2465
City Council Regular Meeting - 23 Sep 2019
SUBJECT/TITLE: BNSF Grade Crossing Signal Installation Agreement for Wells Avenue
South at Houser Way South
RECOMMENDED ACTION: Refer to Transportation (Aviation) Committee
DEPARTMENT: Transportation Systems Division
STAFF CONTACT: Keith Woolley, Transportation Project Manager
EXT.: 7318
FISCAL IMPACT SUMMARY:
The estimated cost of this agreement is $197,832. This agreement is budgeted in the Williams Avenue South
and Wells Avenue South Conversion Project account 317.122908.016.595.30.63.001.
SUMMARY OF ACTION:
The Williams Avenue South and Wells Avenue South Conversion Project requires the replacement of the BNSF
grade crossing signal equipment at the Wells Avenue South railroad crossing. The existing equipment is
outdated and only accommodates one-way traffic.
The Transportation Division has coordinated with BNSF regarding the design. Due to the nature of the BNSF
spur line and the street network, the new signal equi pment will be side-fire without crossing arms.
BNSF performs all work related to their crossing equipment. The attached BNSF Grade Crossing Signal
Installation Agreement establishes that the City will reimburse BNSF for all work related to replacement of the
crossing equipment. The agreement also establishes that the City will reimburse BNSF for any repairs to the
equipment due to damage not caused by BNSF. The attached agreement is also sometimes referred to as a
construction and maintenance agreement, as it establishes cost responsibilities for the construction and
maintenance of the BNSF work and equipment.
EXHIBITS:
A. Agreement
STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
Authorize the Mayor and City Clerk to execute Grade Crossing Signal Installation Agreement for Wells Avenue
South at Houser Way South with BNSF for the Williams Avenue South and Wells Avenue South Conversion
Project.
AGENDA ITEM #6. f)
AGENDA ITEM #6. f)
AGENDA ITEM #6. f)
AGENDA ITEM #6. f)
AGENDA ITEM #6. f)
AGENDA ITEM #6. f)
AGENDA ITEM #6. f)
3lII$.F
L--.___—————/mu WA r
Exhibit “A”
[Insert drawing ofcrossing here]
70159
AGENDA ITEM #6. f)
AGENDA ITEM #6. f)
311$F
—
»‘7/1/in/AV
Exhibit “B”
[Insert plans and speci?cations detailing Railr0ad’s work]
8of9
AGENDA ITEM #6. f)
32¢4cmn...u..uxmSSm.mmmmn”m._C:3.amuse
EENQSQEQ¥
m._Smozs?mmGk$124173
uoommomowm0..c_:_cm
Q
m;C»qmEm_>_am:m
Bmzx?maz"zEm:,E
zo:qzEmEKCE?aou
jmm
__UtLOMZ0»LL.‘.mN.wuccLcm_uWWDOIusmw_mm.m_.m_._._m?.n4_.9‘X9:6528uzamomuézo_ZmEEz:A
ETC
.38Bait;Rh.c25528azamamuézo:umEEm0.ztau5.;__Tv2:2m9U228is
_
.8ozmmaumimjm.:.EmEmEoiauczogJQa.cookwemovw2FuF7m
<3zEzmm.zo:$n:_mr.C_§HxUUL__,..Tu0+moCULD®_u352.9
dbx§:2x%kmtm:c2,8oE33%oE:.a;a
umnoz:..EE3,nCmZ_@
IEHE
mzozmoqiqm
oézmqsEimzouummgieSE28
mmmrwqddam},.mmEomuq#ma,
§§i.N§§§\
usvwis.Ea
\:mQ.Eo.uRmkimm.wkMwi?h.myEK.wC~.~O>~EQ~nwE.:K:Nmax
M\_VMQHNE
H;V.><V:MkV..m§.<:.=2
mN.~_.n.XaxmEA:
%$«mm%E.
l._HU4M;0Am.0
\+Mime\+
Tif2L,
IL:S_In.Z_2_sm.W‘
:12S..l
aw»dataazqimmxmmqimmqam«Ew<m
‘‘L
«naumD»udimmSnow0»
AGENDA ITEM #6. f)
5lII.§F'-
RA/[WAY
Exhibit “C”
[INSERT ESTIMATE OF RAlLROAD’S COSTS HERE]
9of9
AGENDA ITEM #6. f)
AGENDA ITEM #6. f)
AGENDA ITEM #6. f)
AB - 2463
City Council Regular Meeting - 23 Sep 2019
SUBJECT/TITLE: Utility Construction Agreement UTB 1296 with the Washington State
Department of Transportation for Relocation of City Utilities for the I -
405 Renton to Bellevue Widening and Express Toll Lanes Project
RECOMMENDED ACTION: Refer to Transportation (Aviation) Committee
DEPARTMENT: Utility Systems Division
STAFF CONTACT: Abdoul Gafour, Water Utility Manager
EXT.: 7210
FISCAL IMPACT SUMMARY:
Funding for this agreement in the amount of $366,500 is available from the approved 2019 -2020 budgets for
the Water (425/455590) and Wastewater (426/465065) utilities and the Transportation Systems Division
Capital Improvement Program (317.122162.016.595.30.63.001). There is sufficient funding in the respective
section and division budgets to fund this agreement.
SUMMARY OF ACTION:
The Washington State Department of Transportation (WSDOT) is planning construction of improvements for
the I-405 Renton to Bellevue Widening and Express Toll Lanes project through a design -build contract. The
city has existing water and sewer lines within the state-owned right-of-way that need to be relocated to
accommodate the improvements to I-405. According to the provisions of the utility franchise permits granted
by WSDOT, the city is responsible for all utility relocation costs if the utilities conflict with WSDOT’s highway
improvements. Authorizing the interlocal Utility Construction Agreement UTB 1296 will allow WSDOT to
design and construct the relocation of city utilities, including the installation of new city communication and
signal conduits. The agreement also allows WSDOT to obtain reimbursement from the city for the cost of the
work.
EXHIBITS:
A. Issue Paper
B. Interlocal Agreement UTB 1296
STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
Authorize the Mayor and City Clerk to enter into interlocal Utility Construction Agreement UTB 1296 with
WSDOT in the amount of $366,500 for the relocation of city utilities and installation of new city
communication and signal conduits.
AGENDA ITEM #6. g)
PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT
M E M O R A N D U M
DATE:September 10, 2019
TO:Don Persson, Council President
Members of the Renton City Council
VIA:Denis Law, Mayor
FROM:Gregg Zimmerman, Public Works Administrator, ext. 7311
STAFF CONTACT:Abdoul Gafour, Water Utility Manager, ext. 7210
SUBJECT:Utility Construction Agreement UTB 1296 with the Washington
State Department of Transportation for Relocation of City Utilities
for the I-405 Renton to Bellevue Widening and Express Toll Lanes
ISSUE:
Should Council authorize the Mayor and City Clerk to enter into interlocal Utility Construction
Agreement UTB 1296 with the Washington State Department of Transportation (WSDOT), in
the amount of $366,500 for the relocation of existing city water and wastewater utilities and
installation of new city communication and signal conduits?
RECOMMENDATION:
Authorize the Mayor and City Clerk to enter into interlocal Utility Construction Agreement UTB
1296 with the Washington State Department of Transportation (WSDOT), in the amount of
$366,500 for the relocation of existing city water and wastewater utilities and installation of
new city communication and signal conduits
BACKGROUND SUMMARY:
WSDOT is planning for construction of improvements for the I-405 Renton to Bellevue
Widening and Express Toll Lanes project through a design-build contract. The improvements
include the widening of I-405 with the installation of new retaining walls, roadway fills,
reconstruction of bridges at Cedar Avenue South, Renton Avenue South and North 30th Street,
and construction of new roundabouts at the Lake Washington Blvd and NE 44th Street
interchange.
AGENDA ITEM #6. g)
Don Persson, Council President
Members of the Renton City Council
Page 2 of 2
September 10, 2019
\AGlp
The city has existing water lines within the state-owned and limited access rights-of-way that
need to be relocated to accommodate the improvements to I-405. The water lines were
installed in 1977 under a franchise permit from WSDOT. The franchise permit includes
provisions that the city has the legal obligation, at its own cost, to remove, relocate or protect
the water lines, should WSDOT ever determine that they conflict with future highway
improvements, and orders the city to remove and relocate them. An existing city-owned sewer
manhole and a 30-foot section of sewer line need to be replaced in the vicinity of I-405 and
North 8th Street.
In addition, the city’s Transportation Systems Division requests the installation of new city
communication and signal conduits at the Cedar Avenue South and Renton Avenue South
bridges, and the new roundabouts at the NE 44th Street interchange.
WSDOT has submitted a detailed cost breakdown for the relocation of city utilities and for the
new communication and signal conduits in the amount of $366,500. This includes engineering
and design cost, construction cost, indirect costs, construction contingencies and applicable
sales tax. City staff has reviewed the scope of work and the cost breakdown for this work, and
determined that they are within the range of costs for similar and past utility relocation
projects performed by WSDOT through design-build contracts.
The Water and Wastewater utilities and the Transportation Systems Division have budgeted
sufficient funds in their respective capital improvement program budgets to cover the utility
relocation work, as well as the communication and signal conduits.
Cost for Utility
Relocation and for
New Conduits 2019-2020 Adjusted Budget
Water Utility $230,000
$300,000
(account 425/455590)
Wastewater Utility $78,000
$300,000
(account 426/465065)
Transportation Systems $58,500
$60,000
(account 317.122162.016.595.30.63.001)
Total $366,500
CONCLUSION:
Council’s approval of interlocal Utility Construction Agreement UTB 1296 with WSDOT is
needed in order for WSDOT to construct the relocation of city utilities impacted by
improvements for the I-405 Renton to Bellevue Widening and Express Toll Lanes project, and
the installation of new city communication and signal conduits through the
design-build contract.
AGENDA ITEM #6. g)
Utility Construction
Agreement
Work by WSDOT — Shared
Cost
Utility Name & Address
City of Renton
1055 South Grady Way
Renton, WA 98057
Agreement Number
UTB 1296
Region
NWR
Control Section
174303 Project Title/Location
I-405, Renton to Bellevue Widening and Express Toll Lanes
MP 5.4 – Relocate 12-inch water mains in Houser Way N & Lake
Washington Boulevard N
MP 7.2 – Relocate 12-inch water main & remove/replace 2 fire hydrants at
May Creek
MP 7.4/ 7.7 – Remove/replace/relocate 5 fire hydrants and
deactivate/remove/relocate 12-inch water main Lk Wash. Blvd NE
MP 7.8 – Install/extend 30-inch casing for 12-inch water main
MP 3.51/ 3.53 – Install a spare 3-inch conduit on 2 Bridges (Cedar Ave S/
Renton Ave S)
MP 7.5 - Install a spare 2-inch conduit along NE 44th St. at the NE 44th St.
Interchange
MP 7.5 - Install a 2-inch conduit to 3 roundabouts at NE 44th St.
Interchange
MP 4.9 - Remove and install a manhole at NE 8th St and modify the 12”
Sewer Line.
State Route
405
Mileposts
From
02.80 to 14.60
Estimated Agreement Amount
$366,500
Advance Payment
Amount
$0
WSDOT Share
$ not estimated
%
CITY Share
$366,500
100 %
This Utility Construction Agreement (Agreement) is made and entered into between the Washington State
Department of Transportation (WSDOT) and the City of Renton (CITY), collectively the “Parties” and
individually the “Party”.
Recitals
1. WSDOT is planning the construction or improvement of the State Route as shown above for the
identified WSDOT Design-Build Project (DB Project), and in connection therewith, it is necessary to
remove and/or relocate and/or construct certain CITY facilities work (Work).
2. The Work shall be defined as all materials, equipment, labor, contract administration and any other
effort required to perform the preparation of engineering design plans, relocation, construction,
protection and/or removal of the CITY’s facilities.
3. The CITY is responsible for (1) the cost of the Work for CITY facilities located without a documented
ownership of and/or interest in real property, such as being located pursuant to a franchise, a permit,
or undocumented permission, (2) all betterments, and (3) new facilities.
4. WSDOT is responsible for the cost of the Work affecting the CITY’s facilities located pursuant to a
documented ownership of and/or interest in real property, such as an easement, fee title, or court
finding of prescriptive right, which is impacted by the DB Project,
5. WSDOT is undertaking the DB Project, and the CITY is reimbursing WSDOT, as set forth in this
Agreement, for the relocation and construction of certain CITY facilities as outlined in Exhibit A
Attachment 2 (Scope of Work).
AGENDA ITEM #6. g)
Page 2 of 7 UTB 1296
6. The CITY is responsible for the cost of:
(1) May Creek 12-inch Water Main Relocation,
(2) MP 7.8 VIC Casing Install/Extension for 12-inch Water Main,
(3) spare conduits on the Cedar Ave S and Renton Ave S Bridges,
(4) spare conduits at the NE 44th St Interchange,
(5) Remove and install manhole on the east side of I-405/NE 8th St in Renton (see Exhibit C-7), and
(6) Work affecting the CITY facilities located without a documented ownership of and/or interest in
real property
(7) all betterments
(8) any new facilities
7. WSDOT is responsible for the cost of:
(1) relocation of 12-inch Water Mains at the Houser Way /Lake Washington Blvd N area,
(2) removal and replacement of two (2) fire hydrants at May Creek,
(3) deactivation/removal/relocation of the City’s 12-inch Water Main along Lake Washington Blvd NE
and removal/relocation of five (5) fire hydrants along the Lake Washington Blvd NE/Lake
Washington Blvd N,
(4) conduits to the roundabouts at the NE 44th St Interchange
8. It is deemed to be in the best public interest for WSDOT to include the CITY Facilities Work in the DB
Project.
Now, Therefore, pursuant to RCW 47.01.210 and chapter 47.44 RCW and in consideration of the terms,
conditions, covenants, and performances contained herein, as well as the attached Exhibits A , B, and C-1 to
C-7, which are incorporated and made a part hereof,
IT IS MUTUALLY AGREED AS FOLLOWS:
1. PLANS, SPECIFICATIONS, AND BIDS
1.1 Program Guide: Utility Relocation and Accommodation on Federal Aid Highway Projects shall determine
and establish the definitions and applicable standards and payments under this Agreement. By this
reference this document is adopted and made a part of this Agreement as if fully contained herein.
1.2 Betterment: A betterment is any improvement to the CITY’s facilities not required by code, regulation,
standard industry practice, or any other applicable regulation. If any of the Work constitutes a betterment
as defined in the Program Guide: Utility Relocation and Accommodation on Federal Aid Highway
Projects, the CITY is solely responsible for the costs of such improvement.
1.3 Accrued Depreciation: Accrued depreciation may be applied to any of the CITY’s major facilities, such
as a building, pump station, power plant, etc. Accrued depreciation shall not apply to the CITY’s primary
facilities, such as pipelines, conductors, poles, cable, conduit, etc. If any CITY facility does qualify for
an adjustment due to accrued depreciation as defined in Program Guide: Utility Relocation and
Accommodation on Federal Aid Highway Projects, the costs are calculated according to the formula in
the Program Guide.
1.4 WSDOT, acting on behalf of the CITY, agrees to perform the CITY facilities Work in accordance with
the 2018 WSDOT Standard Specifications for Road, Bridge, and Municipal Construction (M41-10) as
amended; Exhibit A Attachments 1 to 3, Special Provisions, as provided by the CITY; and Exhibits C-1
to C-7, Conceptual Plans. WSDOT will incorporate the Conceptual Plans and Special Provisions into
the DB Project’s Request for Proposals (RFP) in accordance with CITY requirements. The CITY agrees
that it has supplied WSDOT with all applicable design and construction standards, codes, regulations,
or any other requirements the CITY is obligated to meet, unless otherwise noted.
1.5 The CITY will review and provide WSDOT with the concurrence on the Work Special Provisions (Exhibit
A, Attachments 1 to 3) and Conceptual Plans (Exhibits C-1 to C-7) that will be incorporated into the
AGENDA ITEM #6. g)
Page 3 of 7 UTB 1296
RFP. WSDOT will advertise the RFP for bids and will be the CITY’s representative during the RFP Ad
and Award period. When requested by WSDOT, the CITY shall timely assist WSDOT in answering bid
questions and resolving any design issues that may arise that are associated with the Work. All
responses to comments and requests for clarification that arise during the RFP Ad and Award period
shall be managed solely by WSDOT. If the CITY supplied the Work plans and special provisions and
standards for the design and construction of the Work, the CITY agrees to provide WSDOT with any
addenda required for the Work during the Ad period, to the Parties’ mutual satisfaction.
1.6 The DB Project will be completed using the design-build method of project delivery. The final plans and
specifications for the Work will be prepared by WSDOT’s Design-Build Contractor (DB Contractor) in
accordance with the 2018 WSDOT Standard Specifications for Road, Bridge, and Municipal
Construction (M41-10), as amended by Exhibit A-Attachments 1 to 3; adopted design and construction
standards, unless otherwise noted; and the Special Provisions and Scope of Work and Conceptual
Plans, Exhibit A Attachments 1 to 3 and Exhibits C-1 to C-7. WSDOT will direct the DB Contractor to
complete the design of the Work in accordance with such plans and specifications and Section 1.7
herein.
1.7 The CITY agrees to meet with the WSDOT’s DB Contractor as necessary to complete the design of the
Work. The CITY shall inform WSDOT of all such meetings and WSDOT shall have the opportunity to
attend said meetings at WSDOT’s discretion. WSDOT shall require the DB Contractor to provide the
CITY with the final proposed plans and specifications for the Work. Thereafter, the CITY agrees to
review said plans and specifications and agrees to provide written notification to WSDOT and the DB
Contractor within fourteen (14) calendar days after receipt whether the CITY approves or has further
comments on said plans and specifications. The CITY shall have final approval authority over any
plans and specifications for the Work and agrees to work in good faith with the DB Contractor to resolve
all issues.
1.8 Any change to the DB Project that may affect the CITY’s facilities must be approved by the CITY.
2. CONSTRUCTION, INSPECTION, AND ACCEPTANCE
2.1 WSDOT agrees to administer the Work on behalf of the CITY. The CITY shall have the right to inspect
any work pertaining to all aspects of constructing their utilities.
2.2 The CITY agrees to disconnect and/or reconnect its facilities as required by WSDOT when such
disconnection or reconnection is required to be performed by the CITY. The Parties agree to define
disconnect and/or reconnection requirements, including notification and response in Exhibit A
Attachments 1 to 3. WSDOT agrees, as part of the Work, to remove disconnected and/or abandoned
facilities at the cost of either WSDOT or the CITY, whichever is responsible for such costs. CITY facilities
not removed pursuant to this Agreement shall remain the ownership, operation, and maintenance
responsibility of the CITY.
2.3 Salvage: All materials removed by WSDOT shall be reclaimed or disposed of by WSDOT and shall
become the property of WSDOT. If the CITY desires to retain such materials and WSDOT agrees, the
value of salvaged materials will be paid to WSDOT in an amount not less than that required by the
Program Guide: Utility Relocation and Accommodation on Federal Aid Highway Projects.
2.4 The CITY may furnish an inspector for the Work. The CITY agrees that it is solely responsible for all
such inspection costs. The CITY’s inspector shall not directly contact WSDOT’s DB Contractor. All
contact between the CITY’s inspector and WSDOT’s DB Contractor shall be through WSDOT’s Project
Construction Engineer. WSDOT’s Project Construction Engineer may request the removal and/or
replacement of the CITY’s inspector if the inspector interferes with WSDOT’s DB Project, WSDOT’s DB
Contractor, and/or the Work.
2.5 WSDOT shall promptly notify the CITY in writing when the Work is completed.
2.6 The CITY shall, within thirty (30) calendar days of being notified that the Work is completed: (a) deliver
a letter of acceptance to WSDOT which shall include a release and waiver of all future claims or
AGENDA ITEM #6. g)
Page 4 of 7 UTB 1296
demands of any nature resulting from the performance of the Work and WSDOT’s administration
thereof, or (b) deliver to WSDOT written reasons why the Work does not comply with the previously
approved RFP Plans and Special Provisions.
2.7 If the CITY does not respond within thirty (30) calendar days as provided in section 2.6, the Work and
WSDOT’s administration thereof will be deemed accepted by the CITY, and WSDOT shall be released
from all future claims and demands.
2.8 Upon completion and acceptance of the Work pursuant to Sections 2.6 or 2.7, the CITY agrees that it
shall be solely responsible for all future ownership, operation, and maintenance costs of its facilities,
without WSDOT liability or expense.
2.9 WSDOT will prepare the final construction documentation in general conformance with WSDOT’s
Construction Manual. WSDOT will maintain one set of plans as the official “as-built” set, then make
notations in red of all plan revisions typically recorded per standard WSDOT practice, as directed by
WSDOT’s Construction Manual. Once the CITY has accepted the Work per Section 2.6 or 2.7, WSDOT,
upon request by the CITY, will provide one reproducible set of RFP contract as-builts to the CITY.
3. PAYMENT
3.1 In consideration for Work performed under this Agreement, the CITY will reimburse WSDOT a lump sum
amount for the actual direct and related indirect costs, including mobilization, construction engineering,
contract administration and overhead costs, associated with the Work as shown in Recital 6 items (1)
to (8) of this agreement and in the attached Exhibit A Attachment 2 and Conceptual plans Exhibits C-1
to C-7. The lump sum amount for the Work is Three Hundred and Sixty-Six Thousand and Five Hundred
Dollars ($366,500), as shown in Exhibit B, Cost Estimate.
3.2 WSDOT agrees that it shall be responsible for all costs for Work as shown in Recital 7 items (1) to (4) of
this agreement.
3.3 The Parties acknowledge and agree that WSDOT does not have the legal authority to advance WSDOT
funds for the CITY’s cost portion of the Work under this Agreement. Should the CITY fail to make
payment according to the terms of this Agreement, WSDOT shall have the right to terminate this
Agreement, charging the CITY for all associated costs of termination, including non-cancellable items,
as well as associated DB Project delay and contractor claims. Such termination shall not relieve the
CITY’s obligation to timely relocate its facilities.
3.4 The CITY, in consideration of the faithful performance of the Work to be done by WSDOT, agrees to
pay WSDOT for the lump sum amount. WSDOT shall invoice the CITY based on progress of the Work
until the total of all the invoices equals $366,500, together with any cost increases pursuant to Section
4. WSDOT will provide supporting documentation with each invoice. The CITY agrees to pay WSDOT
within thirty (30) calendar days of receipt of an invoice from WSDOT. A partial payment will not
constitute agreement as to the appropriateness of any item and that, at the time of final payment, the
Parties will resolve any discrepancies.
4. CHANGE IN WORK OR COST INCREASE
4.1 If WSDOT determines that additional Work or a change in the Work is required, prior written approval
must be secured from the CITY; however, where the change is required to mitigate a DB Project
emergency or safety threat to the traveling public, WSDOT will direct the change without the CITY’s
prior approval. WSDOT will notify the CITY of such change as soon as possible thereafter. The CITY
agrees to respond to all WSDOT change order requests in writing and within fourteen (14) calendar
days. The CITY agrees to pay all change order Work costs for which it is responsible, as well as the
costs of DB Project or Work delays and/or subsequent contractor claims associated with the CITY’s
failure to timely respond as required.
4.2 The CITY may request additions to the Work through WSDOT in writing. WSDOT will implement the
requested changes as elective changes, provided that a change does not negatively impact WSDOT’s
AGENDA ITEM #6. g)
Page 5 of 7 UTB 1296
transportation system and complies with the Standard Specifications, DB Project permits, State and/or
federal law, applicable rules and/or regulations, and/or WSDOT design policies, and does not
unreasonably delay critically scheduled DB Project contract activities.
4.3 All elective changes to the Work shall be approved in writing by the CITY before WSDOT directs the DB
Contractor to implement the changes, even if an executed change order is not required by the DB
Project contract. The CITY agrees to pay for the increases in cost, if any, for such elective changes in
accordance with Section 3.
4.4 WSDOT will make available to the CITY all change order documentation related to the Work.
5. Franchise or Permit
The CITY shall apply for a franchise or permit for those new or modified CITY facilities that will be
located within the State’s right of way. After receiving the application, WSDOT will issue the CITY a
franchise or permit.
6. RIGHT OF ENTRY
6.1 The CITY hereby grants to WSDOT a right of entry, subject to the conditions in permits required for the
DB Project including but not limited to Right of Entry Permit and Civil Construction Permit, onto all lands
in which it has an interest for construction of the Work as defined in Exhibits A and C. Upon completion
and acceptance of the Work, this right of entry shall terminate, except as otherwise provided in Section
5. No access is allowed until such access is obtained through the permit process.
6.2 The CITY agrees to arrange for rights of entry upon all privately owned lands upon which the CITY has
an easement, documented property interest, or permit that are necessary to perform the Work. The
CITY also agrees to obtain all necessary permissions for WSDOT to perform the Work on such lands,
which may include reasonable use restrictions on those lands. The CITY agrees to provide the rights of
entry and applicable permissions to WSDOT within ninety (90) calendar days upon request by WSDOT.
Upon completion of the Work on such lands, the rights of entry and permissions shall terminate, except
as otherwise provided in Section 5.
7. GENERAL PROVISIONS
7.1 Indemnification: To the extent authorized by law, the CITY and WSDOT shall indemnify and hold
harmless one another and their employees and/or officers from and shall process and defend at its own
expense any and all claims, demands, suits at law or equity, actions, penalties, losses, damages (both
to persons and/or property), or costs, of whatsoever kind or nature, brought against the one Party arising
out of, in connection with, or incident to the other Party’s performance or failure to perform any aspect
of this Agreement; provided however, that if such claims are caused by or result from the concurrent
negligence of (a) the CITY and (b) WSDOT, their employees, and/or officers, or involves those actions
covered by RCW 4.24.115, this indemnity provision shall be valid and enforceable only to the extent of
the negligence of the CITY or WSDOT, and provided further, that nothing herein shall require the CITY
or WSDOT to hold harmless or defend the other or its employees and/or officers from any claims arising
from that Party’s sole negligence or that of its employees and/or officers. The terms of this section shall
survive the termination of this Agreement.
7.2 Disputes: If a dispute occurs between the CITY and WSDOT at any time during the performance of the
Work, the Parties agree to negotiate at the management level to resolve any issues. Should such
negotiations fail to produce a satisfactory resolution, the Parties agree to enter into arbitration and/or
mediation before proceeding to any other legal remedy. Each Party shall be responsible for its own fees
and costs. The Parties agree to equally share in the cost of a mediator or arbiter.
7.3 Venue: In the event that either Party deems it necessary to institute legal action or proceedings to
enforce any right or obligation under this Agreement, the Parties hereto agree that any such action or
proceedings shall be brought in the superior court situated in Thurston County, Washington. Further, the
Parties agree that each shall be responsible for its own attorney’s fees and costs.
AGENDA ITEM #6. g)
Page 6 of 7 UTB 1296
7.4 Termination: Neither WSDOT nor the CITY may terminate this Agreement without the written
concurrence of the other Party. Should the CITY terminate this Agreement prior to the fulfillment of the
terms stated herein, the CITY agrees to reimburse WSDOT for all actual direct and related indirect
expenses and costs, including mobilization, construction engineering, contract administration and
overhead costs, incurred up to the date of termination, as well as the cost of non-cancelable obligations,
work order close out costs, and documentation finalization costs, DB Project delays, and DB Contractor
claims associated with the CITY’s Agreement termination. Payments shall be made pursuant to the
provisions of Section 3. Further, the CITY acknowledges and agrees that should it terminate this
Agreement, such termination shall not relieve the CITY from its responsibility to design, remove,
relocate, and/or construct its facilities so as not to delay or conflict with WSDOT’s DB Project. WSDOT
agrees to provide to the CITY all Work-related documents upon final payment by the CITY.
7.5 Amendments: This Agreement may be amended by the mutual agreement of the Parties. Such
amendments or modifications shall not be binding unless put in writing and signed by persons
authorized to bind each of the Parties.
7.6 Independent Contractor: Both Parties shall be deemed independent contractors for all purposes, and
the employees of each Party and any of its contractors, subcontractors, consultants, and the employees
thereof, shall not in any manner be deemed to be the employees of the other Party.
7.7 Audit and Records: During the progress of the Work and for a period of not less than six (6) years from
the date of final payment, both Parties shall maintain the records and accounts pertaining to the Work
and shall make them available during normal business hours and as often as necessary, for inspection
and audit by the other Party, State of Washington, and/or Federal Government and copies of all records,
accounts, documents or other data pertaining to the Work will be furnished upon request. The
requesting Party shall pay the cost of copies produced. If any litigation, claim or audit is commenced,
the records and accounts along with supporting documentation shall be retained until any litigation,
claim or audit finding has been resolved even though such litigation, claim or audit continues past the
six-year retention period.
AGENDA ITEM #6. g)
Page 7 of 7 UTB 1296
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Parties hereto have executed this Agreement as of the day and year last written
below.
CITY OF RENTON WASHINGTON STATE
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
By By
Name Denis Law Name Kim Henry
Title Mayor Title I-405/SR 167 Program Administrator_________
Date Date
Approved As to Form Approved As to Form
By By
Name Shane Moloney Name
Title City Attorney Title Assistant Attorney General_________________
Date Date
Attest: ______________________________________
Jason Seth, City Clerk
Date _______________________________________
AGENDA ITEM #6. g)
UTB 1296
EXHIBIT A Attachment 1
City of Renton
General Design and Construction Standards for Water Main Extensions
The design of all water main extensions of the City of Renton Water System shall conform to the
design standards and requirements of the City and of the State of Washington Department of
Health’s latest Water System Design Manual and standards for Group A Public Water Systems.
Title 4 of the Renton Municipal Code on Development Regulations, adopted in 1998, is the
basis for these Engineering Standards for the design and construction of water main extensions
and related appurtenances.
These standards set forth minimum standards for the planning, design and construction of water
mains and related appurtenances. These standards do not include the design of special
facilities, such as pump stations or reservoirs. These special facilities require unique design
requirements and will subject to individual review by the Water Utility.
Compliance with these standards does not relieve the designer of the responsibility to apply
conservative and sound professional judgment. The Water Utility may at its sole discretion due
to special conditions and/or environmental constraints, require more stringent requirements that
would normally be required.
The construction of all City water system improvements shall comply with the City Development
regulations and standards, the latest City adopted version of Washington State Department of
Transportation (WSDOT) Standard Specifications for Road, Bridge, and Municipal Construction
as amended by APWA and by the City of Renton Public Works Department.
GENERAL REQUIREMENTS FOR EXTENSION OF WATER MAINS
Fireflow requirements
The fireflow requirements for a proposed development, redevelopment, tenant improvements, or
for other types of building improvements or change of building usage shall be determined by the
City of Renton Fire Marshal.
A.The City Water Utility will determine the available fireflow using its computer simulated
hydraulic model of the City water system.
B.The minimum system pressure during fireflow analysis is 20 psi at the fire location and
30 psi throughout the rest of the distribution system.
New developments or redevelopment of existing sites are required to meet the minimum City
fireflow requirements. The developer shall provide information to the City to determine the
fireflow requirements for the development or redevelopment. The developer is responsible for
the design and installation of all necessary water main improvements to provide the required
fireflow including off-site and on-site water mains. The change of use of existing buildings or
areas may also require the installation of the water main improvements.
Water main Sizing
The diameter of transmission main(s) shall be determined by hydraulic analysis to verify that the
main(s) can deliver the required fire flow demand for a proposed development or redevelopment
AGENDA ITEM #6. g)
UTB 1296 Exhibit A Attachment 1 Design & Construction Standards Page 2 of 9
project. The minimum size distribution system line shall not be less than eight inches (8”) in
diameter and for a looped system and for a future looped system.
The minimum size distribution system in single family residential areas shall not be less than
eight inches (8”) in pipe diameter when the main is serving hydrants and domestic water
services. Exception to the minimum diameter might be made in short cul-de-sacs and in areas
where looping of a water main is not feasible and when no future extension will be required. In
these cases the main stubs could be a minimum of six inches (6”) in diameter if no fire hydrants
are connected. The sizing of dead-end water main without fire hydrants shall provide sufficient
flow to the domestic meters and water services.
Water mains in multi-family residential and in non-residential areas shall be sized to provide the
required fire flow demand and shall not be less than eight inches (8”) in pipe diameter.
Water main Oversizing
If it is determined that it would be to the best interests of the City and the general locality to be
benefited thereby to install a larger size main than one then needed or considered by the
owners or developers immediately abutting the street, alley or easement in which such a main is
to be placed, then the City may at its own discretion, require the installation of such a larger
main in which case the City shall pay the difference in cost between the installation cost of the
similar main and of the larger main.
Any party required to oversize the water mains may request the City Water Utility participate in
the cost of the project.
Pipeline Velocities
In accordance with the Department of Health (DOH) recommendations, the City of Renton
requires that the design of new distribution mains provide for operating velocities less than or
equal to eight feet per second (8 ft/sec) under fire flow conditions and other emergency demand
conditions, and under peak hour demand.
Water Main Extension and Location
All water main extensions within the City of Renton will be extended in a manner in and along
routes which comply with the City’s comprehensive water system plan.
All water main extensions shall extend through and across the full frontage of the properties to
be served and shall also be extended through and to the extreme boundaries of the properties
being developed or redeveloped. Whenever possible, provisions shall be made for looping all
existing and new dead-end mains associated with the proposed development or redevelopment
projects. An easement with minimum width of 15 feet shall be provided to the adjacent property
line or right-of-way for looping of a temporary dead-end main.
Preferred location for new water mains in City streets, absent conflict with other existing utilities,
is as follows:
(a)Water mains to be located on the north or east side of the street
(b)Water mains with diameter of 10 inches or less to be located within the paved area of a
roadway and 4 feet from the face of the curb line.
(c)Water mains with diameter of 12 inches or larger to be located within the paved area of
roadway and 6 feet from the face of curb line.
AGENDA ITEM #6. g)
UTB 1296 Exhibit A Attachment 1 Design & Construction Standards Page 3 of 9
(d)Fittings (horizontal bends and blocking) shall be used when necessary to maintain the
uniform offset from the face of the curb line. Pipe deflection may be used on long radius
curve (radius of 500 feet) and shall not exceed one-half of the pipe manufacturer’s
recommended maximum joint deflection.
(e)Water mains shall be installed with no less than three (3) feet cover from finish grade for
pipe with diameter of 10 inches or less and with no less than four (4) feet of cover for
pipe with diameter 12 inches or larger. Water mains shall have no more than six (6) feet
of cover from finish grade.
(f)When water mains are constructed on private properties and within paved areas, the
water mains shall be located outside of the parking stalls when possible.
(g)Easements are required for all water mains to be located on private properties and shall
have a minimum width of fifteen (15) feet.
(h)Water mains shall be encased in a steel casing when crossing under improvements
where the ability to remove and replace the pipe without disturbance to the improvement
is needed. Casings are required when water mains crossings occur under rockeries
over 4 feet high, under retaining wall footings, under reinforced earth retaining walls, and
under railroad tracks. Casings shall extend a minimum of 5 feet past each edge of the
improvements, or a distance equal to the depth of pipe whichever is greater. The carrier
pipe shall be supported by casing spacers, where casing length exceeds 10 feet. The
minimum clearance between the bottom of the rockery and top of pipe casing shall be 2
feet. The trench for the casing pipe shall be backfilled with crushed rocks.
(i)Building setback requirements
•10 feet minimum from building and retaining walls to water main
•5 feet minimum from covered parking to water main
Clearances from Other Utilities
A.All clearances between water mains and other utilities listed below are from outside
edge to outside edge if each pipe
Utility Horizontal Clearance Vertical Clearance
Sanitary 10 feet 18 inches
Reclaimed Water 10 feet 18 inches
Storm 10 feet 18 inches
Gas, Electrical Power,
Telephone, Fiber Optics
5 feet 12 inches
B.Water services shall have at least 5 feet of horizontal separation from sanitary and storm
sewer stubs.
C.At points where thrust blocking is required, the minimum clearance between the back of
the concrete blocking and other buried utilities and structures shall be 5 feet.
D.When water main crosses above or below a sanitary sewer line, one full length of water
pipe shall be used with the pipe centered for maximum joint separation, and in
accordance with Washington Department of Ecology design criteria.
E.Horizontal and vertical bends and blocking shall be used when joint deflection would
exceed one-half of the pipe manufacturer’s recommended maximum deflection.
AGENDA ITEM #6. g)
UTB 1296 Exhibit A Attachment 1 Design & Construction Standards Page 4 of 9
F.Pipe joints shall be restrained where slopes are 20% or greater. Joint restraint on slopes
shall be Megalug restrainer for mechanical joint fittings and tie/rod retainer clamp
assemblies for DI push-on joints, or other methods as approved by the City. Anchor
blocks per City Standard details shall be used in conjunction with joint restraint system
where slope are 20% or greater.
Restrained-joint ductile iron pipes shall be used when more than one standard pipe
length is installed inside a steel casing. The restrained-joint pipe system shall use a
mechanical locking assembly between the bell interior surface and the retainer weldment
on the spigot end of the pipe or with an integrally cast restrained joint bell. Gaskets for
push-on joint pipe with integrally molded steel teeth or locking segments shall not be
allowed for restrained-joint pipes.
G.A blow-off assembly shall be installed at the end of all dead-end lines 6-inch or less in
diameter. A fire hydrant shall be installed at the end of all dead-end lines 8-inch or
larger in diameter.
H.Air/vacuum relief combination valves shall be installed at local high points in the water
main.
Fire Hydrants
The following information is provided as a guideline to be used during the design of water main
improvements and extensions. The final number of hydrants and their location shall be
determined and approved by the City of Renton Fire Marshal, in accordance with City codes,
development regulations and good fire engineering practice and standards.
A.All buildings constructed within the City of Renton shall be served by fire hydrants
installed in accordance with City’s codes and development regulations.
B.No building permit shall be issued until required plans have been submitted and
approved by the City.
C.No construction beyond the foundation shall be allowed until hydrants and mains are in
place.
D.Existing hydrants that do not conform to current City standard shall be replaced with new
conforming hydrants as part of the development and redevelopment projects.
E.Buildings, other than single family residences, located with portions of the building more
than one hundred and fifty feet (150’) in vehicular travel from a fire hydrant shall have
additional hydrants installed at the owner and/or developer’s expense.
F.Fire hydrants shall be located at intersections of public and private roads. The lateral
spacing of hydrants along roadways shall be predicated on hydrants being located at the
roadway intersections.
G.Single-family residential: The maximum spacing of hydrants in single-family residential
areas shall be 500 feet apart. Hydrant coverage shall be no more than 300 feet to any
residential dwellings and the distance shall be measured from the hydrant and along a
traveled roadway, access road and driveway to the dwellings.
H.Multi-family/commercial: The location of the hydrants and the number of hydrants shall
be determined by the Fire Marshal. One hydrant will be required per 1,000 gallons per
minute of fireflow requirement. The maximum distance between hydrants in multi-family
(including duplex), commercial, industrial areas shall be 300 feet. These hydrants shall
AGENDA ITEM #6. g)
UTB 1296 Exhibit A Attachment 1 Design & Construction Standards Page 5 of 9
be located no closer than 50 feet from the structure and no greater than 300 feet. The
primary hydrant shall be no further than 150 feet from the structure.
I.Buildings that have a required fireflow of less than 2,500 gallons per minute may have
fire hydrants on one side of the building only.
J.When the required fireflow for a development or redevelopment project is over 2,500
gallons per minute, on-site fire hydrants will be required and the fire hydrants shall be
served by a water main which loops around the building or complex of buildings and
reconnects back to a distribution supply main.
K.Fire hydrant runs over 50 feet in length must be 8-inch in diameter and be terminated
with a tee, plug and hydrant assembly. Fire hydrant run less than 50 feet in length shall
be 6-inch in diameter.
L.The pumper port of the fire hydrant shall face the street or fire access road. A 3-feet
minimum clearance shall be provided around the outside of the hydrant for operation. A
5-feet minimum clearance shall be provided from the outside of the hydrant to concrete
walls, structures, utility poles and above grade electrical enclosures.
M.A fire hydrant is required within 50 feet of a fire department connection to a fire sprinkler
system.
N.Fire hydrants shall be installed in conformance with the latest City standard details and
specifications.
Water Valving
A.Water valves for twelve-inch (12”) diameter and smaller water mains shall be resilient
seated gate valves. Butterfly valves shall be used when water mains exceed twelve-inch
(12”) in diameter.
B.Water valves shall be installed along the distribution water mains at a maximum spacing
of four hundred (400) feet and at the intersection of lateral lines. Additional valving may
be required for area isolation in order to maintain water service to hydrants and water
meters when a section of the water main between the valves is isolated for repairs.
C.At water main intersections, valves shall be placed on 4 out 4 legs at each cross, and 3
out 3 legs at each tee (unless tapping an existing main). Water valves shall be located
in clusters when possible.
D.A water valve may be required near the end of the water main where future extensions
are anticipated.
E.Water valves should not be placed within the wheel path of vehicle traffic.
Water Service
All water service and appurtenances shall be installed in accordance to the City of Renton latest
Water Utility standard details and specifications.
1.Domestic Water Service:
A.Ownership: The City owns and shall maintain the service line from the tap at the main to
the meter, the meter setter, the meter tailpiece, and the meter box. The property owner
owns and shall maintain the connection fitting to the meter tailpiece, the service line
downstream of the meter tailpiece, and other appurtenances such as pressure reducing
valves, backflow prevention assemblies, etc. behind the meter.
AGENDA ITEM #6. g)
UTB 1296 Exhibit A Attachment 1 Design & Construction Standards Page 6 of 9
B.A separate water meter and water service line will be required for each single-family
residence, detached accessory dwelling unit, townhome unit, and commercial building.
C.All meters shall be the same size as the tap and service connection, unless as otherwise
approved by the Water Utility or as shown on the Water Utility’s standard plans.
D.The minimum allowable size for a water meter to a single family residence shall be
5/8” x 3/4” with a 1-inch service line from the main to the meter. The developer shall
verify that minimum pressure can be maintained when service is flowing at anticipated
maximum levels and shall increase the size of the meter and the size of the private
water service line as necessary to reduce friction losses and drop in pressure.
E.The minimum allowable water service to a single family residence with a residential fire
sprinkler system shall be 1” x 1”. The developer shall check with the fire sprinkler
designer to verify the adequate size for the service line and for the water meter to
provide the required flow for domestic use and for the sprinkler system.
F.The minimum meter and service line for all commercial and multi-family development is
1” x 1”.
G.Water services and meters of three inches (3”) and larger, including meter vaults, full-
size by-pass piping, valves, and associated piping will be purchased and installed by the
developer/contractor under City observation.
H.All new mixed-used buildings shall have separate meters for the multi-family portion and
the commercial portion of the building.
I.If a property owner has an existing meter and needs a larger size service and/or meter,
the property owner is responsible for the upsize of the service line and meter and for the
abandonment of the existing service connection at the main line. All existing meters that
are no longer needed shall be cut and capped at the main line.
J.The location and size of the meters shall be shown on the project plans. The sizing of
water meters and service lines shall be determined by the developer based on the most
recent adopted version of the Uniform Plumbing Code. Water meters shall be located in
a level unobstructed area as close to the City main as possible with the distance not to
exceed fifty (50) feet.
K.Meters to single family residences shall be placed in landscape strips, or behind the
sidewalk, and within the right-of-way. Meters shall not be installed within driveways.
L.Meters to commercial development should be located near driveway entrances within
the right-of-way or within public utility easements in landscape areas, and near access
driveways.
M.An individual pressure reducing valve assembly (PRV) shall be installed downstream of
the water meter in accordance with the City standard details and with the latest edition of
the Uniform Plumbing Code when the service connection pressure exceeds 80 psi.
2.Fire Sprinkler Service:
A.Fire sprinkler service to all buildings, except for single-family residences, shall be
installed by a separate water main connection and service line.
B.Fire sprinkler system connections to the City’s water system shall be owned and
maintained by the property owner, beginning immediately downstream of the
gate valve where the system connects to the City’s water main.
AGENDA ITEM #6. g)
UTB 1296 Exhibit A Attachment 1 Design & Construction Standards Page 7 of 9
C.A backflow prevention assembly equipped with detector check meter, also known
as a Double Check Detector Assembly (DCDA) shall be installed on all fire
sprinkler lines as required by and in accordance with the latest revisions of WAC
246.290.490 or subsequent revisions, the City of Renton Development Standards
and Regulations, the City’s Cross-Connection Control Program Manual and the
City standard details. A Reduced-Pressure Principle Detector Assembly
(RPPDA) shall be installed on fire sprinkler line equipped with a fire pump and/or
on fire sprinkler system in which chemical addition or antifreeze is allowed.
D.When the distance from the point of connection to a City water main to the fire
sprinkler riser assembly is less than fifty (50) feet, the backflow prevention
assembly may be installed as part of the sprinkler riser assembly and be placed
within the building riser room that is adjacent to an exterior wall of the building.
The interior installation of a backflow prevention assembly for the fire sprinkler
system must be pre-approved by the Water Utility and the installation must
conform to the Water Utility standard plans. The location of the backflow
prevention assembly inside the building shall be shown on the building plans and
on the fire sprinkler plans. The detector meter on the backflow prevention
assembly shall be a Sensus Iperl meter with a 520 M radio read conforming to
the City’s water meter standards. The radio read battery-unit and antenna shall
be mounted on the exterior building wall. The building plans and the fire sprinkler
plans shall show the cut-out hole on the building wall to accommodate the
installation of the radio with battery unit and sensor plate.
E.A post indicator valve (PIV) shall be placed at the property line for the fire
sprinkler connection between the public water main within the right-of-way and
the private fire sprinkler supply line. A PIV shall also be placed behind the
backflow prevention assembly for the fire sprinkler system.
F.Fire Department Connections (FDC’s) shall be placed within fifty (50) feet of a
fire hydrant assembly or as directed by the Fire Marshal.
G.The fire sprinkler system and supply line shall be designed by a Fire Protection
Engineer. Separate plans shall be submitted to the City Fire Marshal for review
and permitting.
H.Underground fire sprinkler supply lines shall be installed by a Washington State
Certified Level “U” contractor in accordance with WAC 212-80-010.
3.Landscape Irrigation
A separate landscape irrigation meter and service line shall be installed for all multi-
family, mixed-used, commercial development where water is used for landscape
purposes and will not enter the sanitary sewer system.
Backflow Prevention
Per City Ordinance No. 4312, all irrigation systems, fire sprinklers and other water uses which
may or will cause the contamination of the potable water supply by backflow, shall be required
to install approved backflow prevention assemblies to meet the requirements of WAC 246-290-
490 “Cross-Connection Control Regulations in Washington State:, and the recommendations of
the PNWS-AWWA Cross Connection Control Manual, latest edition, and the City’s Cross-
Connection Control Program – Appendix G. Requirements may include premise isolation, point
of use protection, or a combination of the two.
AGENDA ITEM #6. g)
UTB 1296 Exhibit A Attachment 1 Design & Construction Standards Page 8 of 9
All new multi-family, multiple-use, mixed-used, and commercial buildings or all tenant
improvements to existing multiple-use, mixed-used, and commercial buildings shall have a
Reduced Pressure Backflow Assembly (RPBA) at the water meter or as near as possible to the
water meter for premise isolation. Premise isolation at the water meter by an approved air gap
or a reduced pressure backflow assembly is required for all sites utilizing an auxiliary supply.
Multi-family and mixed-used projects that require backflow prevention protection are strongly
recommended to provide a bypass with equal backflow prevention to avoid interruption or loss
of water service during maintenance, testing and repair.
All backflow prevention assemblies installed shall be on the State of Washington DOH list of
approved backflow prevention assemblies, most recent edition at the time of installation.
Satisfactory testing shall be completed upon the installation, repair, or relocation of all backflow
assemblies, and annually thereafter. A complete test report must be submitted to the Water
Utility or Plumbing Inspector prior to final acceptance.
Connections to Existing System
A.Connections to existing mains including the installation of in-line valve(s) shall be done
by a cut-in tee and valve(s) unless otherwise approved by the City Water Utility.
B.When a “wet-tap or live-tap” of an existing water main is authorized by the City Water
Utility, water mains shall be tapped by a City-approved “wet-tap” contractor and under
the City’s observation. Materials for tapping tee and valves are described in the
following section for Material Requirements and Construction Standards for Water main
Pipes and Appurtenances. Tapping tee shall be made of stainless steel, or full bodied
cast-iron Mueller-type tapping tee, or ductile iron mechanical joint tapping tee with outlet
flange.
C.Size on size tapping tees are not allowed, unless a shell cutter, one size smaller than the
existing water man is used.
D.Connections to existing mains smaller than 8 inches in diameter shall be made by
cutting in a tee, unless otherwise approved by the City Water Utility.
Easements for Public Water Main Improvement and Extension
A public water utility easement to the City is required for the installation, operation, and
maintenance of water mains on private property. The easement shall extend a minimum of
seven and one-half (7.5) feet to each side of the centerline of the main, water meters, hydrants.
The easement shall be provided on City’s standard easement form. Legal description of the
easement along with a sketch of the easement shall be stamped and signed by a licensed land
surveyor and incorporated in the easement form as exhibits.
AGENDA ITEM #6. g)
UTB 1296 Exhibit A Attachment 1 Design & Construction Standards Page 9 of 9
GENERAL DESIGN STANDARDS AND REQUIREMENTS FOR DESIGN PLANS
A. Each fitting or valve shall have end-attachment type listed such as: FL (for flange), MJ
(for mechanical joint), FL x MJ (flange by mechanical joint), FL x FL (for flange by
flange), PE (for plain-end), etc. Call-outs in order, # of each, diameter, fitting, joint type.
For example: 1- 8” Tee (MJ x FL), 1- 8” Gate Valve (FL x MJ), 2-8” 45° Bends (MJ x MJ)
B.List pipe length (from center-of-fitting to center of fitting), size, and material alongside
each pipe, i.e.: 150 LF – 8” DI. Pipe lengths can be listed on a table shown on the same
plan sheet.
C.Dimension existing and new water main locations from right-of-way line and/or property
line or label stations and offsets.
D.Each fitting, valve, hydrant shall have a reference stationing and offset from a street or
right-of-way centerline or from the centerline of an easement.
E.Blocking- Reference Standard Plans:
Blocking shall be shown on the plans at all horizontal and vertical bends, tees, end caps.
The sizing of the blocking shall be as shown on the Standard Plans. Joint restraint at
fittings and pipes in addition to reduced-sized thrust blocks may be required due to
conflict with other utilities, lack of adequate space for support, poor soil, or lack of
sufficient soil bearing area for standard size blocks.
F.Connection details to existing water mains shall be per the Standard Plans. Reference to
the applicable connection details shall be shown on the plans at each connection to the
existing water system. Temporary blow-offs and vertical crosses for “poly-pigging”
stations shall be called-out on the plans and with reference to the applicable Standard
Plans.
G.Existing water mains to be abandoned in place shall be capped at each end with a
mechanical joint cap or plug.
H.All water vaults (for large domestic water meters, backflow prevention assemblies,
pressure reducing stations. etc.) shall include design for floor drain piping to daylight, or,
if daylight is not feasible to the storm system. Where vault floor drain cannot drain to
daylight or to the storm system, consult with the City Water Utility during project design
review to determine the best alternative.
I.Outside-installed Reduced Pressure Backflow Assemblies (RPBA’s) shall be installed in
above ground enclosures. RPBA’s shall not be installed in vaults. All RPBA enclosures
shall be provided with a bore sighted daylight drain sized to meet the flow requirements
of the RPBA relief vent. Meter vaults shall be located outside the sidewalk whenever
possible.
J.Service connections or water utility distribution system piping shall not be used for
grounding of electrical or for the maintenance, integrity or continuity of any grounding
attachment or connection.
K.Manufacturer’s certification of testing and accuracy shall be provided for all large (3-inch
and above) meters installation.
AGENDA ITEM #6. g)
UTB 1296 Exhibit A – Attachment 2
Page 1 of 6
UTB 1296
EXHIBIT A Attachment 2
City of Renton
SCOPE OF WORK
The Work involved under the terms on this Agreement shall include but not be limited to the following:
Engineering Design Drawings
Preparation of engineering design plans for the relocation of City of Renton utility facilities described
herein, in conjunction with WSDOT’s I-405, Renton to Bellevue Widening Express Toll Lanes Project
Mile Post 2.80 to Mile Post 13.8.
Plans (plan and profile) shall meet the City of Renton standards enforced on January 7th, 2019 for
plan submittal. Final plans sheets shall be on 24”x36” or 22”x34” Mylar, matte on both sides. CAD
software used will be AutoCad 2014 or later. Plan scale shall be 1”=10’, 1’=20’, or 1”=30’ for
horizontal and 1”=5’ for vertical. Electronic Pdf files of drawings are also required.
CITY Utility Facilities
Deactivation/ Removal of 12-inch Water Line in Lake Washington Blvd N and in Houser Way N
(MP 5.4) – Houser Way N 12-inch Water Main Relocation (WSDOT’s Cost Responsibility)
Refer to Exhibit C-1 for Conceptual Plan
Work Includes, but not limited to:
Mobilization and demobilization
Furnish and install 3 concrete dead-man anchor blocks on 2 12-inch existing water mains in
Lake Washington Blvd N and in Houser Way N
Furnish and install 2 12-inch gate valves and 3-12-inch tees on existing 12-inch water mains
in Lake Washington Blvd N and in Houser Way N with shackle rods restraint to above new
dead-man blocks
Removal of approximately 50 feet of existing 12-inch water main in Houser Way N for
installation of new storm lines
Furnish and install approximately 60 feet of new 12-inch water main in Houser way N over
new storm lines and connections to existing 12-inch water main on north and south ends
including vertical bends, concrete blocking and shackle rods to dead-man blocks
Furnish and install approximately 100 feet of new 12-inch water mains and related fittings in
existing paved roadway south of the new storm lines crossings in Houser Way N and in Lake
Washington Blvd N and connections to the existing 12-inch water mains in Houser Way N
and in Lake Washington Blvd N
Removal of approximately 100 feet of existing 12-inch water main for installation of new
storm lines in Lake Washington Blvd N
AGENDA ITEM #6. g)
UTB 1296 Exhibit A – Attachment 2
Page 2 of 6
All pipe shall be Restrained- Joint Pipe Class 52 Ductile Iron, Cement Lined; with poly-wrap
and a bury depth of 4-feet minimum and 6 feet maximum. All mechanical joint valves and
fittings shall have restrained retainer glands and/or restrained with shackle rods. Backfill
within the pipe trench zone shall meet City of Renton Standards.
Trenching, excavation, import/export trench backfill, shoring, dewatering, backfill, connections
to existing water mains and final restoration of roadway surfaces per City of Renton
Standards.
The Work also includes: removal of existing water lines and thrust blocks as required by
permitting agencies, all traffic control, erosion control, sedimentation control, and the
restoration of public and private lands
Construction of 12” Water Line Relocation (MP 7.2) - May Creek Water Main Relocation
(City of Renton Cost Responsibility) - Refer to Exhibit C-2 for Conceptual Plan
Work Includes, but not limited to:
Mobilization and demobilization
Furnish and install approximately 307 feet of 12-inch Restrained-Joint (RJ) ductile iron pipe
(DI) and restrained-joint fittings, connections to the existing 12-inch City of Renton water line
located within the unimproved right-of-way of May Creek
Furnish and install 2 12-inch gate valves (RJ) inline connected to concrete deadman thrust
blocks
All pipe shall be Restrained- Joint Pipe Class 52 Ductile Iron, Cement Lined; with poly-wrap
and a bury depth of 4-feet minimum and 6 feet maximum. Backfill within the pipe trench zone
shall be consistent with City of Renton Standards
Trenching, excavation, import/export trench backfill, shoring, dewatering, backfill, connections
to existing water mains and final restoration of roadway surfaces per applicable City of
Renton Standards and/or WSDOT’s standards.
The Work also includes: removal of existing water lines and thrust blocks as required by
permitting agencies, all traffic control, erosion control, sedimentation control, and the
restoration of public and private lands
Removal and Relocation of WSDOT’s hydrants at May Creek (WSDOT’s Cost Responsibility)
Refer to Exhibit C-2 for Conceptual Plan
Work Includes, but not limited to:
Removal and/or abandonment of approximately 175 feet of 8-inch water main and one fire
hydrant on west side of I-405 and south of May Creek
Furnish and install approximately 150 feet of 8-inch water main and one new fire hydrant
assembly along west side of I-405 with connection to existing 12-inch water main
Removal and/or abandonment of approximately 70 feet of 8-inch water main and one fire
hydrant on east side of I-405 and south of May Creek
AGENDA ITEM #6. g)
UTB 1296 Exhibit A – Attachment 2
Page 3 of 6
Furnish and install approximately 15 feet of 6-inch Restrained-Joint (RJ) ductile iron pipe (DI)
and one new fire hydrant assembly along east side of I-405 including connection to new 12-
inch water main
All pipe shall be Restrained- Joint Pipe Class 52 Ductile Iron, Cement Lined; with poly-wrap
and a bury depth of 4-feet minimum and 6 feet maximum. Backfill within the pipe trench zone
shall be consistent with City of Renton Standards
Trenching, excavation, import/export trench backfill, shoring, dewatering, backfill, connections
to existing water mains and final restoration of roadway surfaces per applicable City of
Renton Standards and/or WSDOT’s standards.
The Work also includes: removal of existing water lines and thrust blocks as required by
permitting agencies, all traffic control, erosion control, sedimentation control, and the
restoration of public and private lands
Deactivation/ Removal/Relocation of 12” Water Line in Lake Washington Blvd. NE at Gypse
Creek crossing (MP 7.4/ 7.7), (WSDOT Cost Responsibility) - Refer to Exhibit C-3 for
Conceptual Plan
To remove the identified 12” DIP water main in Lake Washington Blvd NE, the water main in SE 76th
St will need to be connected to the existing 12” DIP water main extending northward from the
intersection of Lake Washington Blvd NE and SE 76th St.
Work Includes, but not limited to:
Removal of approximately 675 feet of 12” DIP water main, appurtenances and thrust blocks
within new WSDOT Right-of-Way for Lake Washington Blvd NE
Removal of 2 fire hydrant assemblies and laterals south of SE 76th St along Lake Washington
Blvd NE
Removal of existing valve vault and all interior piping and laterals including for existing
detector check valve for fire sprinkler system to demolished Denny’s building
Removal of existing hydrant and install a new hydrant assembly behind back of proposed
sidewalk along Lake Washington Blvd NE north of SE 76th St
Relocation of 2 existing hydrants and service to back of proposed sidewalk/or planter area
along Lake Washington Blvd N/NE 44th St (west side of I-405)
Furnish and install approximately 180 feet of 12-inch Restrained-Joint (RJ) ductile iron pipe
(DI) connection to the existing 12-inch City water line located within the improved and paved
right-of-way of the City of Renton for Lake Washington Blvd NE
Furnish and install a 12-inch gate valve on existing 12-inch water main along SE 76th St
Furnish and install a 12-inch tee and isolation valve on new 12-inch water main
Install Bends/ Fittings as designed per City of Renton Design Standards
All pipe shall be Restrained- Joint Pipe Class 52 Ductile Iron, Cement Lined; with poly-wrap
and a bury depth of 4-feet minimum and 6-feet maximum. Backfill within the pipe trench zone
shall be consistent with City of Renton Standards
AGENDA ITEM #6. g)
UTB 1296 Exhibit A – Attachment 2
Page 4 of 6
Trenching, excavation, import/export trench backfill, shoring, dewatering, backfill, connections
to existing water mains and final restoration of roadway surfaces per applicable City of
Renton Standards and/or WSDOT’s standards.
The Work also includes: removal of existing water lines and thrust blocks as required by
permitting agencies, all traffic control, erosion control, sedimentation control, and the
restoration of public and private lands
Install/Extend 30” Casing on 12” Water Main (M.P 7.8)
(City of Renton’s Cost Responsibility) - Refer to Exhibit C-4 for Conceptual Plan
Work Includes, but not limited to:
Mobilization and demobilization
Furnish and install approximately 65 feet of welded split steel casing 30-inch in diameter
around existing 12-inch D.I. water main on west side of I-405 at Sta. 7715+46 beyond the
limit of new embankment and/or new retaining walls, including casing spacers and pipe
runners and connection to end of existing steel casing.
Removal of approximately 45 feet of existing 12” D.I. water main and fittings on east side of I-
405 outside of end of existing 30-inch steel casing
Furnish and install approximately 30 feet of new 30-inch diameter steel casing along east
side of I-405 at Sta. 7715+46 and connection to existing 30-inch steel casing beyond the limit
of new embankment and/or new retaining walls.
Furnish and install approximately 50 feet of new 12-inch D.I. restrained-joint water main
inside the above new section of 30-inch diameter steel casing
Connection of the new water main inside new steel casing to existing water main at both
ends, including special fittings, vertical bends with concrete blocking and with city-approved
restrained system for pipes and fittings.
Trenching, excavation, import/export trench backfill, shoring, dewatering, backfill, connections
to existing water mains and final restoration of roadway surfaces per applicable City of
Renton Standards and/or WSDOT’s standards.
The Work also includes: removal of existing water lines and thrust blocks as required by
permitting agencies, all traffic control, erosion control, sedimentation control, and the
restoration of public and private lands
Installation of spare 3” Communication Conduit on Cedar Ave S/ Renton Ave S Bridges (M.P.
3.51, M.P. 3.13) - Conduit in Bridges (City of Renton’s Cost Responsibility) - Refer to Exhibit
C-5 for Conceptual Plan
Work Includes, but not limited to:
Mobilization and demobilization
Furnish and install approximately 250 feet of spare 3-inch communication conduit, fittings and
connection, including trenching and backfill to connect across the Cedar Ave S bridge and
extend beyond approach slabs
AGENDA ITEM #6. g)
UTB 1296 Exhibit A – Attachment 2
Page 5 of 6
Furnish and install approximately 250 feet of spare 3-inch communication conduit, fittings and
connection, including trenching and backfill to connect across the Renton Ave S bridge and extend
beyond approach slabs
Installation of spare 2” conduit at the NE 44th Street Interchange (M.P. 7.49) (City of Renton’s
Cost Responsibility) – Refer to Exhibit C-6 for Conceptual Plan
Work Includes, but not limited to:
Mobilization and demobilization
Furnish and install approximately 1,580 feet of 2-inch spare conduit, fittings and connection,
including trenching and backfill to hang under NE 44th Street bridge and extend beyond
approach slabs along NE 44th to the limits of WSDOT Right-of-Way
Furnish and install approximately 85 feet of 2-inch communication conduit, fittings and
connection, including trenching and backfill to cross under NE 44th St, just west of the
interchange outside of WSDOT Right-of-way.
Installation of 2” conduit to Roundabouts at the NE 44th Street Interchange (M.P. 7.49)
(WSDOT’s Cost Responsibility) – Refer to Exhibit C-6 for Conceptual Plan
Work Includes, but not limited to:
Mobilization and demobilization
Furnish and install approximately 70 feet of 2-inch communication conduit, fittings and
connection, including trenching and backfill to provide conduit to NE 44th St Roundabout
Center Island west of the interchange.
Furnish and install approximately 70 feet of 2-inch communication conduit, fittings and
connection, including trenching and backfill to provide conduit to NE 44th St Roundabout
Center Island east of the interchange.
Furnish and install approximately 50 feet of 2-inch communication conduit, fittings and
connection, including trenching and backfill to provide conduit to Lake Washington Blvd NE
Roundabout Center Island northeast of the interchange.
Manhole Removal and installation at NE 8th St (M.P. 4.9) (City of Renton’s Cost Responsibility)
– Refer to Exhibit C-7 for Conceptual Plan
Work Includes, but not limited to:
Mobilization and demobilization
Removal of existing Manhole to the 12” Sewer on the east side of I-405 & NE 8th St that is in
conflict with the DB Project widening.
Removal of approximately 38 feet of 12-inch Ductile Iron Sanitary Sewer Pipe between the
existing Manhole and proposed 60-inch manhole that would be in conflict with the DB Project
widening.
AGENDA ITEM #6. g)
UTB 1296 Exhibit A – Attachment 2
Page 6 of 6
Furnish and install approximately 30 feet of 12-inch Ductile Iron Sanitary Sewer Pipe inside of
20-inch steel casing. Connect to existing pipe and casing.
Furnish and install a new 60-inch Sanitary Sewer Manhole with inside drop connection
approximately 10 feet clear of proposed retaining wall.
Trenching, excavation, import/export trench backfill, shoring, dewatering, backfill, connections
to existing sanitary sewer and final restoration of roadway surfaces per applicable City of
Renton Standards and/or WSDOT’s standards.
The Work also includes all traffic control, erosion control, sedimentation control, and the
restoration of public and private lands
AGENDA ITEM #6. g)
UTB 1296
EXHIBIT A Attachment 3
CITY OF RENTON
WATER ENGINEERING STANDARD PLANS
February 2016
AGENDA ITEM #6. g)
UTB 1296Exhibit A Attachment 3Page 2 of 18AGENDA ITEM #6. g)
UTB 1296Exhibit A Attachment 3Page 3 of 18AGENDA ITEM #6. g)
UTB 1296Exhibit A Attachment 3Page 4 of 18AGENDA ITEM #6. g)
UTB 1296Exhibit A Attachment 3Page 5 of 18AGENDA ITEM #6. g)
UTB 1296Exhibit A Attachment 3Page 6 of 18AGENDA ITEM #6. g)
UTB 1296Exhibit A Attachment 3Page 7 of 18AGENDA ITEM #6. g)
UTB 1296Exhibit A Attachment 3Page 8 of 18AGENDA ITEM #6. g)
UTB 1296Exhibit A Attachment 3Page 9 of 18AGENDA ITEM #6. g)
UTB 1296Exhibit A Attachment 3Page 10 of 18AGENDA ITEM #6. g)
UTB 1296Exhibit A Attachment 3Page 11 of 18AGENDA ITEM #6. g)
UTB 1296Exhibit A Attachment 3Page 12 of 18AGENDA ITEM #6. g)
UTB 1296Exhibit A Attachment 3Page 13 of 18AGENDA ITEM #6. g)
UTB 1296Exhibit A Attachment 3Page 14 of 18AGENDA ITEM #6. g)
UTB 1296Exhibit A Attachment 3Page 15 of 18AGENDA ITEM #6. g)
UTB 1296Exhibit A Attachment 3Page 16 of 18AGENDA ITEM #6. g)
UTB 1296Exhibit A Attachment 3Page 17 of 18AGENDA ITEM #6. g)
UTB 1296Exhibit A Attachment 3Page 18 of 18AGENDA ITEM #6. g)
UTB 1296 EXHIBIT B COST ESTIMATE Page 1 of 4
UTB 1296
EXHIBIT B
COST ESTIMATE
I-405, Renton to Bellevue Widening and Express Toll Lanes
CITY’s Cost Responsibility
SUMMARY
MAY CREEK Water Main Relocation – M.P 7.2 TOTAL = $ 85,160
(CITY’s Cost Responsibility) - Conceptual Plan Exhibit C-2
MP 7.8 Vic Casing Extension – M.P. 7.8 TOTAL = $ 47,350
(CITY’s Cost Responsibility) - Conceptual Plan Exhibit C-4
Conduit in Bridges – M.P. 3.51/ 3.13 TOTAL = $ 7,500
(CITY’s Cost Responsibility) – Conceptual Plan Exhibit C-5
Conduit at 44th Street Interchange – M.P. 7.49 TOTAL = $ 26,250
(CITY’s Cost Responsibility) – Conceptual Plan Exhibit C-6
Manhole Removal & Installation at NE 8th St – M.P. 4.9 TOTAL = $ 44,890
(CITY’s Cost Responsibility) – Conceptual Plan Exhibit C-7
CITY SUBTOTAL = $211,150
Sales Tax (@ 10%) = $21,115
Engineering and Design (@ 20%) = $42,230
Construction Management (@ 8%) = $16,890
Construction Cost Escalation (@7.5%) = $15,840
SUBTOTAL = $307,230
Contingency (@7.5%) = $23,040
WSDOT Indirect Costs (@11.78%) = $36,190
TOTAL = $366,460
USE TOTAL = $366,500
***********************************************************************************
Note: Jan 2019 (index 288.3) to July 2021 (310.1) = 7.5% Cost Escalation
AGENDA ITEM #6. g)
UTB 1296 EXHIBIT B COST ESTIMATE Page 2 of 4
EXHIBIT B
COST ESTIMATE
I-405, Renton to Bellevue Widening and Express Toll Lanes
City Cost Responsibility
MAY CREEK Water Main Relocation
New 12-inch D.I. (RJ) water main 307 feet @ $210/ft** = $64,750
12” Waterline Service Connection 1 each @ $5,500/ea = $ 5,500
Remove exist. 12-inch water main 293 feet @ $30/ft* = $ 8,790
12-inch gate valve 2 each @$3,200/ea = $ 6,400
Total $85,160
* Unit cost includes all labor, materials per Conceptual Plan on Exhibit C-2.
** 12” restrained-joint DI pipe and fittings, import trench backfill, concrete dead-man blocks, and related fittings and appurtenances.
USE TOTAL $85,160
MP 7.8 VIC Casing Extension - Extend 30” Casing
Install 30” casing on existing 12-inch water main 65 feet @ $330/ft* = $ 21,450
Remove existing 12” water main 45 feet @ $30/ft = $ 1,350
Install 12” water main (R.J.) and fittings 50 feet @ $210/ft** = $ 10,500
Install 30” casing on new 12-inch water main 30 feet @ $285/ft* = $ 8,550
12” Waterline Service Connection 1 each @ $5,500/ea = $ 5,500
Total $47,350
* Unit cost includes complete casing installation including all labor, materials as indicated on Exhibit C-4.
** 12” restrained-joint DI pipe and fittings, import trench backfill, concrete blocking, and related fittings and appurtenances.
USE TOTAL $47,350
Conduit @ Bridges – Install conduit crossing 2 Bridges at Renton Hill
Cedar Ave S
INSTALL One Spare 3-inch Conduit 250ft @ $15/ft = $3,750
* Placed under the bridge deck $3,750 ** Conduit to go from pull vault to pull vault located beyond approach slabs, includes vaults
*** Cost includes all labor & materials
Renton Ave S
INSTALL One Spare 3-inch Conduit 250ft @ $15/ft = $3,750
* Placed under the bridge deck $3,750 ** Conduit to go from pull vault to pull vault located beyond approach slabs, includes vaults
*** Cost includes all labor & materials
USE TOTAL $7,500
AGENDA ITEM #6. g)
UTB 1296 EXHIBIT B COST ESTIMATE Page 3 of 4
EXHIBIT B
COST ESTIMATE
I-405, Renton to Bellevue Widening and Express Toll Lanes
City Cost Responsibility
Conduit at 44th Street Interchange
NE 44th Street from Project Limit West to Project Limit East
INSTALL One SPARE 2-inch Conduit 1580ft @ $15/ft = $23,700
Crossing NE 44th, West Side of Interchange
INSTALL One 2-inch Conduit 85ft @ $30/ft = $2,550
TOTAL $26,250
USE TOTAL $26,250
Manhole Removal and Installation at NE 8th St
Remove 12” DI SS Pipe 38 feet @ $30/ft = $ 1,140
Remove existing manhole 1 each @ $2,565/ea = $ 2,565
Install 12” DI SS Pipe and fittings 30 feet @ $150/ft** = $ 4,500
Install 20” casing on new 12” DI SS Pipe 30 feet @ $240/ft* = $ 7,200
Install 60” Sanitary Sewer Manhole w/Drop Conn. 1 each @ $9,850/ea = $ 9,850
Testing Sewer Pipe 30 feet @ $18/ft = $ 540
Str. Excavation Class B incl. Haul 117 CY @ $60/CY = $ 7,200
Shoring or Extra Excavation Class B 592 SF @ $7/SF = $ 4,144
Gravel Backfill 69 CY @ $115/CY = $ 7,935
Total $44,894
* Unit cost includes complete casing installation including all labor, materials as indicated on Exhibit C-7.
** 12” restrained-joint DI pipe and fittings, import trench backfill, concrete blocking, and related fittings and appurtenances.
USE TOTAL $44,890
AGENDA ITEM #6. g)
UTB 1296 EXHIBIT B COST ESTIMATE Page 4 of 4
HOUSER WAY Water Main Relocation – M.P 5.4
(WSDOT Cost Responsibility) CITY TOTAL = $0
LWB Water Main and Hydrants Relocation and Removal – M.P. 7.4/ 7.7
(WSDOT Cost Responsibility) CITY TOTAL = $0
May Creek 2 hydrants Relocation and Removal – M.P. 7.4/ 7.7
(WSDOT Cost Responsibility) CITY TOTAL = $0
Conduit to Roundabouts at 44th Street Interchange – M.P. 7.49– M.P. 7.4/ 7.7
(WSDOT Cost Responsibility) CITY TOTAL = $0
AGENDA ITEM #6. g)
�
\\
,:-�\ ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' '
'
' \\ \·� 0
... \ \ 'it, ii
CONCEPTUAL NOT
FOR CONSTRUCTION
11
PSE HIGH PRES 12-INCHQLB
I I 'I
"' I 'IS \ "', "' I', \ / I I ', .,,I/ g ,"'i '
I! !J) / l ;,' \ /. '
\0 ',/(J') \ I \ ,' ',g \/ \ I ,(f) \ & I ,' \ ', I , \ ' , r* ' ·"'\'
,' "� I I � -
I --,,. ' 1\ \
,\ II I/ '..1[)-
,' I,, lit , /Zf; 1/
-+ : \ !
I I
\ : ,� ��R��AiTBER \ 2-INCH CONDllJIT"', QL B
\
4
\
\
'll, +
\ 'll, + \
0
,'
INSTALL 12" x 12" TEE (MJxMJ)
AND THRUST BLOCK
SHACKLE TEE TO NEW VALVE AND TO
DMB
INSTALL APPROX. 100 LF 12" DI
WATER MAIN
REMOVE APPROX. 100 LF OF EXIST 12" CI WATER MAIN
UTB 1296 EXHIBIT C-1 SHEET 1 OF 2
INSTALL 12" GATE VALVE AND
DEAD-MAN BLOCK ON
EXISTING WATER MAIN
PRIOR TO REMOVAL OF
EXISTING WATER MAIN
12"x12" TEE (FLXFL)
CONC. BLOCK
2-12" GATE VALVES (FLxMJ)
1-12" FLxMJ ADAPTER
20 LF OF 12" D.I. WATERMAININSTALL 12" GATE VALVE AND
DEAD-MAN BLOCK ON EXISTING 12"
WATER MAIN
BEFORE REMOVAL OF EXISTING PIPE
12"-45° BEND (MJxMJ)
CONC. BLOCK
CONNECT TO EXIST 12" WATERMAIN
WITH 12" SLEEVE (MJ)
REMOVE EXISTING WATER MAIN PRIOR TO
INSTALLATION OF NEW STORM LINES
INSTALL APPROX. 60 LF OF NEW 12'"WATER MAIN OVER
NEW STORM LINES - VERTICAL BENDS AND BLOCKING
ARE NOT SHOWN AND WILL BE REQUIRED FOR VERTICAL
ADJUSTMENTS
INSTALL CONCRETE DEAD-MAN BLOCK (DMB) ON
EXISTING 12" WATERMAIN AND SHACKLE EXISTING
12" TEE TO DMB BEFORE REMOVAL OF EXISTING PIPE
INSTALL 12" PLUG (MJ) ON SOUTH END OF TEE
10 FTEX. 12" GV
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxEXIST 12" TEE WITH 3 GATE VALVES
EX
1
2
"
W EX 12" WEX 12" WNOTES:
ALL MECHANICAL JOINT FITTINGS SHALL HAVE
WEDGE-TYPE RESTRAINED RETAINER GLANDS IN
ADDITION TO CONCRETE BLOCKING PER RENTON
STANDARD PLANS.EX 12"
W
REVISED BY CITY OF RENTON WATER UTILITY- 12/13/18HOUSER WAY
NAGENDA ITEM #6. g)
C ...
u z � iii
Cl)
I-
Cl)
0:: �
0 O r------------t-----o::-f--------+-+----w Cl) z <( 0 C) :c • a..N
0:: 0::
-------\..,\ V
\\ '----
10FT W X 21FT L
KING COUNTY
SS 96 INCH DIAM.
I
/
w """ ..J w I---
0
WW
I-a.. ;g •..J• w� 0::
Cl) C I-
Cl)
�
0:: 0
0:: w > w a.. I-; . 0 0 ..J . . w N""" 0::
0 0::0 wI-3:u. 0
M a... . z CIC)-:!!:---
0
CITY OF RENTON
SS 8 INCH DIAM.
so
EXISTING GROUND
0:: I-w 0:: >w Cl)
0 m <(
0 -0 u. 0 :E 40 I-C 0 u.>0 w I t5 M ii: . . ::::, N z . I N m -:!!:J\ - -0:: I 0:: -------....
y -�I \\\2:1 TYP.
30 36 INCH PIPE
'JACK & BORE
3 • 42 INCH PIPES
0
10FT W X 21FT L
;10 � �____L_____L_____L_____L___j__L__L__l___L_j____J__J_____L___L_J__L_L___L_L___l__l__l__l_L_J__j____l__J__J__l___l_l__L_J_J__L_C]10
3+00 4+00 �1
3
1+00 2+00
...... :,: Washington State .,,,g Department of Transportation
1-405 RENTON TO BELLEVUE PLOTTED BY: blackal
DATE: 8/16/2018 TIME: 4:01:15 PM
LINE 1: LAKE WASHINGTON BLVD. N WATER LINE AT PROPOSED STORMWATER CROSSING
LINE 2: PROFILE AT PROPOSED STORMWATER CROSSING
UTB 1296 EXHIBIT C-1 SHEET 2 OF 2
MP 5.4 - HOUSER WAY Water Main Relocation
STORMWATER LINES PROFILE
REMOVE 12" WATER
HOUSER WAY NLAKE WASHINGTON BLVD NN
NEW 12" WATER OVER
STORM LINES
REVISED BY CITY OF RENTON WATER UTILITY- 12/13/18 AGENDA ITEM #6. g)
???40404040404040405050
50
50
50
505060 6060
60
60 6070
70
80 808090 9090100
110
120
1-24337
1-24338
taylorsu
c:\users\taylorsu\pw_wsdot\d0191391\XL5467_May Creek_City Water_UI1538.dgnPLOTTED BY:
DATE:9/6/2018 TIME:10:56:51 AM
Washington State
Department of Transportation
LINE 2:
LINE 1:
40 4040
506040181938.55
1792
38.67
180541.87
1793
44.72
1797
44.80
1794
44.83
179544.86
1796
44.92
179845.11
179945.67
178445.85
1786
45.91
1785
45.96
1788
45.96
180846.00182146.00
182246.00
1823
46.00
1824
46.00
182546.00
1826
46.00
1827
46.00
1828
46.00
182946.00
1837
46.001838
46.001839
46.00
1840
46.00
1841
46.00
1842
46.00
184346.00
1787
46.21
1800
46.23
1807
46.50
1806
46.55
1790
46.56
1789
46.57
179146.79183046.79
1801
46.79
1804
46.80
1803
47.34
180247.92
1831
48.44
1813
48.93
1810
49.06
1809
49.06
1814
49.55
1815
49.73
1812
49.79
181149.84
1816
49.85
183250.59
1817
50.67
181851.22
1820
52.12
1833
52.22
1834
55.95183557.00183659.81QL B8-INCH DUCTILE IRONWATER LINECITY OF RENTONQL B8-INCH DUCTILE IRONWATER LINECITY OF RENTONQL B12-INCH CAST IRONWATER LINECITY OF RENTONQL BQL BWATER LINE12-INCH CAST IRONWATER LINECITY OF RENTONQL BQL BWATER LINE12-INCH CAST IRONWATER LINECITY OF RENTONSB I-405
I-405 RENTON TO BELLEVUE
LINE 2: UTB 1296 EXHIBIT C-2
SCALE IN FEET
0 25 50
FOR CONSTRUCTION
CONCEPTUAL NOT
UTB 1296 EXHIBIT C-2 SHEET 1 OF 4
NB I-405
LINE 1: MAY CREEK VIC. WATER LINE CONCEPT
EX 12" DIWP
12-IN WATER MAIN
CONNECT TO EXISTING
CONNECT TO EXISTING 12-IN WATER MAIN
(WSDOT COST RESPONSIBILITY)
8X12-IN TEE AND 8-IN VALVE
SUPPLY LINE WITH NEW
NEW 8-IN HYDRANT AND WATER
(WSDOT COST RESPONSIBILITY)
WATER SUPPLY LINE
EXISTING 8-IN HYDRANT AND
REMOVE OR ABANDON IN-PLACE
(WSDOT COST RESPONSIBILITY)
AND WATER SUPPLY LINE
PLACE EXISTING 8-IN HYDRANT
REMOVE OR ABANDON IN
8-IN VALVE (WSDOT COST RESPONSIBILITY)
SUPPLY LINE WITH NEW 8X12-IN TEE AND
NEW 8-IN HYDRANT AND WATER
ABANDONED IN PLACE
MAIN TO BE REMOVED OR
293-FT OF EXISTING 12-IN WATER
MIN. 3-FT OF COVER FROM FINISHED GRADE
CLASS 52 D.O. PIPE AND FITTINGS. PROVIDE
MAIN WITH NEW 12-IN RESTRAINED-JOINT
RELOCATE APPROX. 307-LF OF 12-IN WATER
MAIN RELOCATION
MP 7.2 - MAY CREEK WATER
STREAM SECTION CUT
REPRESENTATIVE
SECTION CUT
STREAM
REPRESENTATIVE
MP 7.2 - MAY CREEK Water Main Relocation
UTB 1296 Exhibit C-2 Sheet 1 of 4
I
(CITY OF RENTON COST RESPONSIBILITY)EXIST 12" DIP WATEREXIST 12" DIP WATER
SHACKLE NEW 12-INCH GATE
VALVE AND BEND TO EXISTING
CONCRETE DEAD-MAN BLOCKW (E)W (E)W (E)W (E)W (E)REMOVE EXISTING CONCRETE DEAD
MAN BLOCKS
NEW 12-INCH GATE VALVE
REVISED BY CITY OF RENTON WATER UTILITY 12/12/2018 AGENDA ITEM #6. g)
(PROTECT IN PLACE)
MAY CK. INTERCEPTOR
KING CO. SS
EX 36" RCP
ABUTMENT/FOUNDATION
EX BRIDGE
EX GROUND
EX GROUND
ABUTMENT/FOUNDATION
EX BRIDGE
ABUTMENT/FOUNDATION
EX BRIDGE
N.T.S.
PROPOSED ROADWAY
taylorsu
c:\users\taylorsu\pw_wsdot\d0191391\XL5467_May Creek_City Water_UI1538.dgnPLOTTED BY:
DATE:8/30/2018 TIME:8:42:35 AM
Washington State
Department of Transportation
LINE 2: CITY OF RENTON WATER LINE AT MAY CREEK CROSSING NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION
CONCEPTUAL I-405 RENTON TO BELLEVUE
LINE 1: REPRESENTATIVE TYPICAL STREAM SECTION - NO IN WATER WORK CONCEPT
OHWM
UTB 1296 EXHIBIT C-2 SHEET 2 OF 4
MP 7.2 - RELOCATE 12" WATER MAIN AT MAY CREEK
BEDDING AND BACKFILL.
REPLACE WITH BANK RUN GRAVEL
AND PIPE TRENCH ZONE, AND
MATERIALS WITHIN PIPE BEDDING
REMOVE ALL EXISTING CONCRETE
OVER NEW 12-INCH WATER MAIN.
PROVIDE MINIMUM 3-FT. OF COVER
MIN. 3-FT COVER
WATER MAIN
RELOCATED 12" D.I.
ABANDONED IN PLACE
TO BE REMOVED OR
EX 12" D.I. WATER MAIN
LINE
FROM PROPOSED GROUND
POINT 2-FT MIN. DEPTH
UPLAND EXCAVATION TO A
WHERE EXPOSED BY
FOUNDATION REMOVED
EX BRIDGE PIER AND
LINE
FROM PROPOSED GROUND
POINT 2-FT MIN. DEPTH
UPLAND EXCAVATION TO A
WHERE EXPOSED BY
FOUNDATION REMOVED
EX BRIDGE PIER AND
SECTION)
FROM REPRESENTATIVE
FOOTING (DOWNSTREAM
EX PILE SUPPORTED
PROPOSED BRIDGE CLEAR SPAN
SURFACE TRAIL
8' WIDE SOFT
PROPOSED GRADE
MP 7.2 - MAY CREEK Water Main Relocation
UTB 1296 Exhibit C-2 Sheet 2 of 4
REVISED BY CITY OF RENTON WATER UTILITY 12/12/2018 AGENDA ITEM #6. g)
V
O P
h
Q y
h
m
o
Ih IU ,
n
p
x
ory.
y 3
y
H
P
Il n pea t o I F"
k
I h k
m N
W o
x
O
3
V V
V
V 4 O
SYSTEM 21
Beehive Sfioine^
Z" Gq /v Air I/enf Gipe
24„
CgnereGe B /acC /2'r /Z'r24
Carpgr
Tqp /nfo
REGION NO. STATE I FDb AID FRC t i0. —E— M1it? 1
1Q WASH
MP 7.2 -- 12” water main at May Creek as-built
UTB 1296 Exhibit C-2 Sheet 3 of 4
MP 7.2 - MAY CREEK Water Main Relocation
EXISTING CONDITIONS
AGENDA ITEM #6. g)
MP 7.2 -- 12” water main at May Creek as-built
UTB 1296 Exhibit C-2 Sheet 4 of 4
MP 7.2 - MAY CREEK Water Main Relocation
EXISTING CONDITIONS
AGENDA ITEM #6. g)
SSSS
SS
SS???MB
???????????UUUUUUUUUUUUUCCCC
CPP PP TRSTL TL
UT
taylorsu
c:\users\taylorsu\pw_wsdot\d0191391\XL5467_LkWaBlvdNE_CityWater.dgnPLOTTED BY:
DATE:8/29/2018 TIME:3:54:01 PM
Washington State
Department of Transportation
LINE 2:
LINE 1:
W
W
FOR CONSTRUCTION
CONCEPTUAL NOT
I-405 RENTON TO BELLEVUE
NB I-405
SB I-405
PUBLIC STORAGE
LINE 1: LAKE WASHINGTON BLVD. NE WATER LINE CONCEPT
SCALE IN FEET
0 25 50
REMOVE
UTB 1296 EXHIBIT C-3
LINE 2: UTB 1296 EXHIBIT C-3
MP 7.7 - 12" WATER MAIN RELOCATION AND REMOVAL
REMOVE EXISTING HYDRANT
REMOVE
REMOVE
REMOVE EXISTING HYDRANT
METERS
VALVE ASSEMBLIES, VAULTS,
EXISTING 12" DI WATER MAIN,
REMOVE OR ABANDON ~675 LF,
REMOVE
REMOVE
ROADWAY PAVEMENT
MAIN WITHIN PROPOSED
EXISTING 12" DI WATER
NEW CONNECTION TO
SIDEWALK
OF PROPOSED
AND SERVICE TO BACK
RELOCATE HYDRANT
PAVMENT LIMITS
BLVD. ROADWAY
NEW LAKE WASHINGTON
DI WATER MAIN WITHIN
RELOCATE ~180 LF, 12"
ST
MAIN IN NE48TH/SE76TH
EXISTING 12" DI WATER
NEW CONNECTION TO
SERVICE
DENNY'S WATER
REMOVE EXISTING
VALVE IN CONC. VAULT
EXISTING 12" GATE
EXISTING 8" GATE VALVE
EXISTING 12"X8" TEE
EXISTING 8" GATE VALVE
EXISTING 12"X8" TEE VALVE IN CONC. VAULT
EXISTING 12" GATE
VALVE IN CONC. VAULT
EXISTING 12" GATE
MAIN
EXISTING 12" DI WATER NE4
8
TH
/ SE7
6
TH STBLVD
NE
LAKE
WASH
INGTON
MP 7.4/ 7.7 - LWB Water Main Relocation and Removal
UTB 1296 EXHIBIT C-3 SHEET 1 OF 2
(WSDOT'S COST RESPONSIBILITY)W (E)W (E)W (E)W (E)W (E)W (E)W (E)W (E)W (E)W (E)W (E)W (E)W (E)W (E)W (E)W (E)W (E)W (E)EXIST 12" W
INSTALL NEW HYDRANT
ASSEMBLY BEHIND BACK OF
PROPOSED SIDEWALK
REMOVE EXISTING HYDRANT
REVISED BY CITY OF RENTON WATER UTILITY 12/13/18
NEW 12-INCH GATE VALVE
ON EXISTING WATER MAIN
NEW 12-INCH TEE AND VALVE
AGENDA ITEM #6. g)
????????UUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUCC
CPP
P
P
PPPP
PPWWWWWWWWUTLivingT
c:\users\livingt\pw_wsdot\d0191391\XL5467_LkWaBlvdN_NE44_CityWater_hydrants.dgnPLOTTED BY:
DATE:11/13/2018 TIME:4:05:34 PM
Washington State
Department of Transportation
LINE 2:
LINE 1:
SIDEWALK
OF PROPOSED
AND SERVICE TO BACK
RELOCATE HYDRANT
AREA
PROPOSED PLANTER
AND SERVICE TO
RELOCATE HYDRANT
SCALE IN FEET
0 25 50
MAIN
EXISTING 12" DI WATER
24" RCP CASING
MAIN IN
EXISTING 12" DI WATER
(PROTECT IN PLACE)
WATER MAIN
EXISTING 12" DI
WATER MAIN
EXISTING 12" DI
(PROTECT IN PLACE)
LINE 2: UTB 1296 EXHIBIT C-5
I-405 RENTON TO BELLEVUE
FOR CONSTRUCTION
CONCEPTUAL NOT
UTB 1296 EXHIBIT C-5
SB I-405
LINE 1: LAKE WASHINGTON BLVD. N / NE 44TH ST - RELOCATE EXISTING HYDRANTS
MP 7.35-7.40 - RELOCATE EXISTING HYDRANTS
(PROTECT IN PLACE)
(PROTECT IN PLACE)
EXISTING HYDRANT
BLVD N
LAKE WASHINGTON
NE 44TH ST
SEAHAWKS WAY
EASTSIDE RAIL CORRIDOR
N
4
3
RD STUTB 1296 EXHIBIT C-3 SHEET 2 OF 2
MP 7.4/ 7.7 - LWB Water Main Relocation and Removal REVISED BY CITY OF RENTON WATER UTILITY 12/13/18(WSDOT'S COST RESPONSIBILITY)
W (E)
W (E)
W (E)
W (E)
W (E)
W (E)
W (E)
W (E)
W (E)
W (E)
W (E)
W (E)
W (E)
W (E)
W (E)
W (E)
W (E)
W (E)
W (E)W (E)W (E)W (E)
W (E)W (E)W (E)W (E)W (E)W (E)W (E)W (E)W (E)W (E)W (E)W (E)W (E)
W (E)
W (E)
W (E)
W (E)
W (E)
W (E)
W (E)
W (E)
W (E)
W (E)
W (E)
W (E)
W (E)
W (E)
W (E)
W (E)
W (E)
W (E)
W (E)
W (E)
W (E)
W (E)
W (E)W (E
)W (E
)W (E
)W (E
)W (E
)W (E
)W (E
)W (E
)W (E
)W (E)W (E)
W (E)
W (E)
W (E)
W (E)
W (E)
W (E)
W (E)
W (E)
W (E)
W (E)
W (E)
W (E)
W (E)
W (E)
W (E)
W (E)
W (E)
W (E)
W (E)
W (E)
W (E)
W (E)
W (E)
W (E)
W (E)
W (E)
W (E)
W (E)
W (E)
W (E)
W (E)
W (E)
W (E)
W (E)
W (E)
W (E)AGENDA ITEM #6. g)
?U
PP?PMBMBM
B
LivingT
c:\pwworking\wsdot_pw\d0191391\XL5467_I405xing_CityWater_UI1541.dgnPLOTTED BY:
DATE:5/31/2019 TIME:8:48:00 AM
Washington State
Department of Transportation
LINE 2:
LINE 1:
162534.22162335.32160735.91162235.98160836.45160936.73161037.06162437.26162139.94161140.98162041.57161942.36W354742.97161843.35161243.99161744.09161344.49161644.81161445.86161546.18EXISTING 30" STEEL CASING
APPROX. LIMITS OF
~128'
0
25
50
75
0 25 50 75 100 125 150 175 200-25-50-75-100-125-150-175-200
0
25
50
75PROP R/WEX R/WNB I-405SB I-405
SS
~65'
WATER MAIN
EX 12" DIA. D.I.
KC ESI
EX 78" DIA RCP
CROSSING NO.4 DETAIL
PER AS-BUILT PLAN
1' CLEARANCE
WSDOT R2B PROJECT ROADWAY LIMITS
I-405 MASTER PLAN ROADWAY LIMITS
~30'
EXISTING 12" DIA. D.I. WATER MAIN
REMOVE APPROX. 45 LF OF
30" STEEL CASING
WATER MAIN INSIDE
EXISTING 12" D.I.
STEEL CASING
EXTEND 30" WELDED SPLIT
STEEL CASING
EXTEND 30"
EXISTING 30" DIA. STEEL CASING.
CONNECT NEW CASING TO END OF
EXISTING 12" D.I. WATER MAIN.
WELDED SPLIT STEEL CASING AROUND
INSTALL APPROX. 65 LF OF 30" DIA.
CONNECT TO EXISTING CASING
STEEL CASING.
INSTALL APPROX. 30 FEET OF 30" LAKE WASHINGTON BLVD NESCALE IN FEET
0 25 50
I-405 RENTON TO BELLEVUE7711771377117713
LINE 1: EXISTING CITY OF RENTON WATERLINE CROSSING UI 1541
MASTER PLAN EDGE OF PAVEMENT
R2B EDGE OF PAVEMENT
7712+46 (UI 1541 CITY OF RENTON)
UTB 1296 EXHIBIT C-4
RIPLEY LN NNB I-405SB I-405MAINLINE NEAR RIPLEY LN N.
EAST AND WEST SIDES OF I-405
EXISTING 12" WATER MAIN TO THE
MP 7.8 VIC. - EXTEND 30" CASING ON
FOR CONSTRUCTION
CONCEPTUAL NOT
SECTION CUT
7712+46
SECTION CUT
7712+46
PER FIELD LOCATE/SURVEY
EX CITY OF RENTON 12" DI
~128'
MP 7.8 - 112th Casing Extension
PER AS-BUILT DRAWING
EX CITY OF RENTON 12" DI
CONCRETE BLOCKING
MAIN WITH VERTICAL BENDS AND
CONNECT TO EXISTING 12" D.I. WATER
CASING.
WATER MAIN INSIDE NEW 30" STEEL
APPROX. 50 LF OF NEW 12" D.I.
12" D.I. WATER MAIN AND INSTALL
REMOVE APPROX. 45 LF OF EXISTING
EXISTING 30" STEEL CASING
APPROX. LIMITS OF
STEEL CASING
EXTEND 30"
PER AS-BUILT DRAWING
EX CCUD 12" DIA. WATER MAIN
LINE 2: UTB 1296 EXHIBIT C-4 , INCLUDES CITY OF RENTON REVISIONS, DATED 12/14/2018
EXISTING 30" DIA. STEEL CASING
CONNECT NEW CASING TO END OF
EXISTING 12" D.I. WATER MAIN.
WELDED SPLIT STEEL CASING AROUND
INSTALL APPROX. 65 LF OF 30" DIA.
SPLIT STEEL CASING
INSTALL 30" WELDED
~65'~30'AGENDA ITEM #6. g)
AGENDA ITEM #6. g)
CITY OF RENTON COST (SPARE 2" CONDUIT WITH PULL ROPE/TAPE)
UTB 1296 EXHIBIT C-6 NE44TH INTERCHANGE CONDUIT
UTB 1296 EXHIBIT C-6
AS PART OF CITY OF RENTON STREET MODIFICATION PERMIT CONDITION)
WSDOT COST 2" (CONDUIT WITH PULL ROPE/TAPE
2" SPARE CONDUIT, NE44TH ST CROSSING (OUTSIDE OF WSDOT ROW) ~ 85 LF
WSDOT ROW
2" CONDUIT TO ROUNDABOUT CENTER ISLAND ~ 70 LF
TO PROJECT LIMIT EAST = ~ 1580 LF
2" SPARE CONDUIT, NE 44TH FROM PROJECT LIMIT WEST
WSDOT ROW
ROW
LIMITED ACCESS
PROPOSED WSDOT
2" CONDUIT TO ROUNDABOUT CENTER ISLAND ~ 70 LF
2" CONDUIT TO ROUNDABOUT CENTER ISLAND ~ 50 LFT??????
?
???????
????
?
?
?????????MB
???????????
???????????UUUCPPCUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUCCCCCCC
CCCC CCCCCCCCC
CCCCCCCCCP
PPPPPPPP
PPPPPPPP
P PPPPPPPPP PPPP
PPPPPPTWPWTWPWWWSSWWWWWWWWWBUSONLYBUSONLY TRS TRS TRS
TRSTL TL
U
U
U
U
U
U
T
TT
T
T
T
LivingT
c:\pwworking\wsdot_pw\d0198435\RentonUtility_exhibits_BR-conduit.dgnPLOTTED BY:
DATE:5/28/2019 TIME:4:41:26 PM
Washington State
Department of Transportation
LINE 2:
LINE 1:
E
EE LEGEND
EE
E
NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION
CONCEPTUAL DESIGN AGENDA ITEM #6. g)
40607
0
809
0
1
0
01001
0
0
1
1
0
1
3
0
140
160
180STT
???
U
U
UU
UUU
U
U
U U U
U
U
CCPP P
200'P.S.E. R/WLivingT
c:\pwworking\wsdot_pw\d0224361\COR12-IN-SS_UI1268.dgnPLOTTED BY:
DATE:5/15/2019 TIME:11:08:51 AM
Washington State
Department of Transportation
LINE 2:
LINE 1:
NAVD88 INV EL=164.41
AS-BUILT INV EL=160.92
MH 15
CONFIRMED WITH CITY OF RENTON.
AS-BUILT DATUM HAS NOT BEEN
+3.49' TO APPROX. NAVD88 ELEVATION.
DATUM IS NGVD29. ELEVATIONS ADJUSTED
ELEVATIONS SHOWN ASSUME AS-BUILT PLAN
NOTE:
EXISTING GROUND
EX NB I-405
I-405 R2B WIDENING
WIDENING
MASTER PLAN
IN 20" STEEL CASINGEX 12" DI SS PIPE
50
60
70
80
90
100
110
120
130
140
150
160
170
180
190190
50
60
70
80
90
100
110
120
130
140
150
160
170
180
190190
20+00 21+00 22+00 23+00 24+00 25+00 26+00
DATUM
(NAVD) 88
EX SB I-405
NAVD88 INV EL=118.36
AS-BUILT INV EL=114.87
EXISTING MH 14
NAVD88 INV EL=91.08
AS-BUILT INV EL=87.59
EXISTING MH 13
NAVD88 INV EL=83.60
AS-BUILT INV EL=80.11
EXISTING MH 12 WSDOT R/WREMOVE
I-405 R2B WIDENING
MASTER PLAN WIDENING
AS-BUILT INV EL=N/A
AS-BUILT FOR L.I.D. 306)
EXISTING MH (MH-1 PER
RENTON TO BELLEVUE PROJECT
PROPOSED RETAINING WALL
RENTON TO BELLEVUE PROJECT
PROPOSED FINISHED GRADE
INTERCHANGE IS CONSTRUCTED
IF N 8TH DIRECT ACCESS
FINSHED GRADE
MASTER PLAN CONCEPT
LIMITS OF EXISTING 20" DIAMETER STEEL CASING
12" DI SS PIPE
REMOVE APPROX. 38'
CASING
STEEL
EXTEND
PER COR STD. DETAILS 400.1 & 402.2
W/ INSIDE DROP CONNECTION
INSTALL NEW 60" SS MH (APPROX. H=28')
EXTEND 20" STEEL CASING
WELD CONNECTION AND
OF 12" DI SS PIPE
INSTALL APPROX. 30 LF
SS+
+
NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION
CONCEPTUAL DESIGN
CITY OF RENTON UI 1268 (EXIST 12" SS)4020
SCALE IN FEET
0
SS
SS
SS
SS
SS
WSDOT R/W
NAVD88 INV EL=83.60
AS-BUILT INV EL=80.11
EXISTING MH 12
NAVD88 INV EL=91.08
AS-BUILT INV EL=87.59
EXISTING MH 13
NAVD88 INV EL=118.36
AS-BUILT INV EL=114.87
EXISTING MH 14
AS-BUILT INV EL=N/A
AS-BUILT FOR L.I.D. 306)
EXISTING MH (MH-1 PER
NAVD88 INV EL=164.41
AS-BUILT INV EL=160.92
MH 15
SS
PER COR STD. DETAILS 400.1 & 402.2
W/ INSIDE DROP CONNECTION
INSTALL NEW 60" SS MH (APPROX. H=28')
EX PSE TRANSMISSION TOWER
APPROX.
10' CLR.
STEEL CASING
WELD CONNECTION AND EXTEND 20"
OF 12" DI SS PIPE
CONFLICT AND INSTALL APPROX. 30 LF
REMOVE EXISTING SEWER PIPE IN
REMOVE
S
B
I-
4
0
5
S
B
I-
4
0
5
AGENDA ITEM #6. g)
AB - 2461
City Council Regular Meeting - 23 Sep 2019
SUBJECT/TITLE: Project Acceptance: CAG 18-120 with Road Construction NW, Inc. for
the Falcon Ridge Lift Station Replacement and Force Main
Improvements
RECOMMENDED ACTION: Council Concur
DEPARTMENT: Utility Systems Division
STAFF CONTACT: Michael Benoit, Wastewater Utility Engineer
EXT.: 7206
FISCAL IMPACT SUMMARY:
The original contract amount was $926,502.50 and the final amount is $919,153.42, a decrease of $7,349.08.
The decrease in cost was due to the reduction of quantities (i.e. less road restoration than anticipated).
The approved 2018 Capital Improvement Program for the Falcon Ridge Lift Station and Force Main Project
budget (426.465480) was $1,000,000. A total of $722,000 was carried forward into 2019 for completion of the
project. The amount budgeted for the project is enough to cover the construction, engineering and staff
costs.
SUMMARY OF ACTION:
The Falcon Ridge Lift Station Replacement and Force Main Improvements project was awarded to Road
Construction NW, Inc. on August 13, 2018. Construction began on October 15, 2018 and was completed on
July 31, 2019.
The project consisted of replacing the Falcon Ridge Lift Station and work on the force main to improve operation and
reliability.
EXHIBITS:
A. Notice of Completion of Public Works Contract
STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
Accept the Falcon Ridge Lift Station Replacement and Force Main Improvements project with Road Construction NW,
Inc. and authorize the release of retainage in the amount of $41,779.69 after 60 days, subject to the receipt of all
required authorizations.
AGENDA ITEM #6. h)
Revised #
Assigned to:
UBI Number:
Yes No
Yes
Contractor's Name
Date:Contractor's UBI Number:
Date Work Accepted
Federally funded transportation project?
Name & Mailing Address of Public Agency
E-mail Address
Contract Number
Notice is hereby given relative to the completion of contract or project described below
Description of Work Done/Include Jobsite Address(es)
Affidavit ID*
No (if yes, provide Contract Bond Statement below)
NOTICE OF COMPLETION OF PUBLIC WORKS CONTRACT
Project Name
Date Assigned:
Job Order Contracting
Date Contract Awarded
Telephone #
Bond Number:
Retainage Bond Contract/Payment bond (valid for federally funded transportation projects)
Name:
Department Use Only
Original
If Retainage is not withheld, please select one of the following and List Surety's Name & Bond Number.
Date Work Commenced Date Work Completed
Contractor Address
Were Subcontracters used on this project? If so, please complete Addendum A. Yes No
$
$$
$$
$$
$
$$
Contact Name:Title:
F215-038-000 04-2014
Email Address:Phone Number:
p
Additions ( + )
Amount Retained
REV 31 0020e (4/28/14)
Amount of Sales Tax
Contract Amount
Sub-Total
Reductions ( - ) Amount Disbursed
TOTAL
Note: The Disbursing Officer must submit this completed notice immediately after acceptance of the work done under this contract.
NO PAYMENT SHALL BE MADE FROM RETAINED FUNDS until receipt of all release certificates.
Submitting Form: Please submit the completed form by email to all three agencies below.
TOTAL
Liquidated Damages
Comments:
(If various rates apply, please send a breakdown)
NOTE: These two totals must be equal
p
Affidavit ID* - No L&I release will be granted until all affidavits are listed.
Contract Release
(855) 545-8163, option # 4
ContractRelease@LNI.WA.GOV
Employment Security
Department
Registration, Inquiry,
Standards & Coordination
Unit
(360) 902-9450
publicworks@esd.wa.gov
Department of Revenue
Public Works Section
(360) 704-5650
PWC@dor.wa.gov
V e(//)
AGENDA ITEM #6. h)
Subcontractor's Name:UBI Number: (Required)Affidavid ID*
Provide known affidavits at this time. No L&I release will be granted until all affidavits are listed.
Addendum A: Please List all Subcontractors and Sub-tiers Below
This addendum can be submitted in other formats.
For tax assistance or to request this document in an alternate format, please call 1-800-647-7706. Teletype (TTY) users may use the
Washington Relay Service by calling 711.
REV 31 0020e Addendum (04/28/14)F215-038-000 04-2014
AGENDA ITEM #6. h)
1
CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON
ORDINANCE NO. ________
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON, ANNEXING CERTAIN
TERRITORY TO THE CITY OF RENTON (HIGHLAND MEADOWS ANNEXATION; FILE
NO. A‐18‐001).
WHEREAS, under the provisions of RCW 35A.14.120, as amended, a written annexation
petition was presented and filed with the City Clerk on or about January 22, 2019 ; and
WHEREAS, prior to the filing and circulation of the petition for annexation to the City of
Renton, pursuant to RCW 35A.14.120, the petitioning parties, comprised of property owners of
not less than ten percent (10%) in value, according to the assessed valuation for general taxation
of the area to be annexed, notified the City Council of their intention to commence the direct
petition for annexation proceedings; and
WHEREAS, after a public hearing, it was determined that the petitioning owners agreed
to accept that portion of the City's Comprehensive Plan as it pertains to the territory including
the applicable zoning regulation relating thereto; and
WHEREAS, the King County Department of Assessments examined and verified the
signatures on the petition for annexation on or about March 6, 2019, and determined that the
signatures represent at least sixty percent (60%) of the assessed value (excluding streets) of the
area to be annexed, as required by RCW 35A.14.120; and
WHEREAS, the Department of Community and Economic Development of the City of
Renton considered and recommended that the City of Renton annex the properties; and
AGENDA ITEM # 8. a)
ORDINANCE NO. _______
2
WHEREAS, consistent with RCW 35A.14.130, the City Council set May 6, 2019, in the City
Council Chambers, City Hall, as the time and place for a public hearing on the petition with notice
as required by law; and
WHEREAS, pursuant to notice, the public hearing was held at the time and place specified,
and the City Council considered all matters in connection with the petition and determined that
all legal requirements and procedures applicable to the RCW 35A.14.120 petition method for
annexation have been met; and
WHEREAS, a "Notice of Intention," including all required information for review of the
annexation, was transmitted to the King County Boundary Review Board and approved as of
August 2, 2019;
NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON, DO
ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS:
SECTION I. All requirements of the law in regard to the annexation by petition
method, including the provisions of RCW 35A.14.120, 130, 140, and 150 have been met. It is
further determined that the petition for annexation to the City of Renton of the property and
territory described below is hereby approved and granted; the following described property
being contiguous to the city limits of the City of Renton is hereby annexed to the City of Renton,
and such annexation to be effective on and after the approval, passage, and thirty (30) days after
publication of this ordinance; and on and after said date the property shall constitute a part of
the City of Renton and shall be subject to all its laws and ordinances then and thereafter in force
and effect; the property being described as follows:
AGENDA ITEM # 8. a)
ORDINANCE NO. _______
3
See Exhibit “A” attached hereto and made a part hereof as if fully set forth herein
[The proposed annexation area is approximately 12.5 acres and is bounded by
parcel lines. It is bordered by a parcel line near Northeast 4th Street to the north,
158th Avenue Northeast to the east, parcel lines in proximity of Northeast 2nd
Street (if extended), and parcel lines in proximity to 154th Avenue Southeast (if
extended) to the west. The boundaries to the north and west are coterminous
with existing City limits.]
and the owners of the properties within the annexation area shall be subject to the City's
Comprehensive Plan and Zoning Code.
SECTION II. This ordinance shall be effective upon its passage, approval, and thirty (30)
days after publication of a summary of this ordinance in the City’s official newspaper. The
summary shall consist of this ordinance’s title.
A certified copy of this ordinance shall be filed with the King County Council, State of
Washington, and as otherwise provided by law.
PASSED BY THE CITY COUNCIL this _______ day of _____________________, 2019.
Jason A. Seth, City Clerk
APPROVED BY THE MAYOR this _______ day of _____________________, 2019.
Denis Law, Mayor
AGENDA ITEM # 8. a)
ORDINANCE NO. _______
4
Approved as to form:
Shane Moloney, City Attorney
Date of Publication:
ORD:2082:9/10/19
AGENDA ITEM # 8. a)
ORDINANCE NO. _______
5
EXHIBIT “A”
LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF THE PROPERTY
AGENDA ITEM # 8. a)
ORDINANCE NO. _______
6
AGENDA ITEM # 8. a)
Renton Highlands Meadows Annexation Area Source, City of Renton, 2018 AGENDA ITEM # 8. a)
1
CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON
ORDINANCE NO. ________
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON,
REGARDING THE CITY’S PARTICIPATION IN THE SOUTH CORRECTIONAL ENTITY
(SCORE); AUTHORIZING THE EXECUTION OF AN AMENDED AND RESTATED
INTERLOCAL AGREEMENT RELATING TO SCORE; APPROVING THE CITY’S CAPITAL
CONTRIBUTION RELATED TO REFUNDING BONDS TO BE ISSUED TO REFINANCE
THE SCORE FACILITY; APPROVING OTHER MATTERS RELATED THERETO,
PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY, AND ESTABLISHING AN EFFECTIVE DATE.
WHEREAS, the City of Renton, Washington (the “City”) is authorized by chapter 70.48
RCW to contract for, establish and maintain correctional facilities in furtherance of public safety
and welfare; and
WHEREAS, pursuant to an ordinance adopted by the City Council and chapter 39.34 RCW,
the Interlocal Cooperation Act, the City entered into a SCORE Interlocal Agreement with the other
parties thereto dated February 25, 2009 and subsequently amended and restated on October 1,
2009 (as amended and restated, the “Original Interlocal Agreement”), to form a separate
governmental administrative agency known as the South Correctional Entity (“SCORE”); and
WHEREAS, the South Correctional Entity Facility Public Development Authority (the
“Authority”), a public corporation chartered by the City, pursuant to RCW 35.21.730 through
35.21.757, issued its Bonds, Series 2009A (the “2009A Bonds”) and Bonds, Series 2009B (Taxable
Build America Bonds—Direct Payment) (the “2009B Bonds,” and together with the 2009A Bonds,
the “2009 SCORE Bonds”) on November 4, 2009, in the aggregate principal amount of
$86,235,000; and
WHEREAS, proceeds of the 2009 SCORE Bonds were used to finance a portion of the costs
of acquiring, constructing, developing, equipping and improving a regional misdemeanant
AGENDA ITEM # 8. b)
ORDINANCE NO. ________
2
correctional facility located in Des Moines, Washington (the “SCORE Facility”), operated by
SCORE; and
WHEREAS, pursuant to an ordinance adopted by the City Council, the City pledged its full
faith and credit toward the payment of its allocable proportion of the debt service due on the
2009 SCORE Bonds issued by the Authority; and
WHEREAS, the 2009 SCORE Bonds are subject to defeasance and/or redemption prior to
their stated maturity dates; and
WHEREAS, after due consideration it appears to the Board of Directors of the Authority
that the 2009 SCORE Bonds may be defeased and/or redeemed prior to maturity by proceeds of
refunding bonds (the “Refunding Bonds”) and other legally available funds for overall debt
service savings; and
WHEREAS, the City now desires to pledge its full faith and credit to the City’s allocable
portion of the Refunding Bonds and to amend and restate the Original Interlocal Agreement to
provide for such refunding and other matters as provided herein;
NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON, DO
ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS:
SECTION I. Definitions. Terms defined in the recitals of this ordinance are
incorporated as if fully set forth herein. Terms not otherwise defined in this ordinance shall have
the meanings set forth in the Interlocal Agreement (defined in Section 2).
SECTION II. Approval of Interlocal Agreement. The City hereby approves the Amended
and Restated SCORE Interlocal Agreement substantially in the form attached hereto as Exhibit A
and incorporated herein by this reference (the “Interlocal Agreement”). The Mayor is hereby
AGENDA ITEM # 8. b)
ORDINANCE NO. ________
3
authorized and directed to execute the Interlocal Agreement, on behalf of the City, with such
changes as determined to be appropriate by such representative and in the best interest of the
City. On the Effective Date, the Interlocal Agreement shall amend and restate, in its entirety, the
Original Interlocal Agreement.
The Mayor is hereby designated, together with his or her designee, as the “Designated
Representative” for purposes of the Interlocal Agreement. The Interlocal Agreement may be
further amended from time to time as provided therein. The City hereby authorizes and confirms
the authority vested in the Administrative Board as provided in the Interlocal Agreement.
SECTION III. City Contributions. The Authority has proposed to issue one or more series
of refunding bonds (the “Refunding Bonds”), the proceeds of which will be used, together with
other legally available funds, to refund the outstanding 2009 SCORE Bonds for overall debt
service savings.
The City hereby irrevocably covenants and agrees to pay its capital contribution in the
percentage provided for in the Interlocal Agreement, which is equal to the City’s allocated owner
percentage as shown in the following chart (the “Owner Percentage”), to pay debt service on
the Refunding Bonds as the same shall become due and payable and to pay administrative
expenses of the Authority with respect to the Refunding Bonds (the “Capital Contribution”). The
Owner Percentage allocated to the City is as follows:
AGENDA ITEM # 8. b)
ORDINANCE NO. ________
4
Owner City Owner Percentage
Auburn 34.94%
Renton 40.96
Tukwila 9.64
Des Moines 6.02
Burien 4.82
SeaTac 3.62
Total 100.00%
The authorization contained in this ordinance is conditioned upon the issuance of
Refunding Bonds not exceeding the aggregate principal amount of $56,000,000 without
obtaining additional Council approval.
The City recognizes that it is not obligated to pay the Capital Contribution of any other
Member City; the Capital Contribution of the City shall be limited to its Owner Percentage
allocable share of such obligations; all such payments shall be made by the City without regard
to the payment or lack thereof by any other jurisdiction; and the City shall be obligated to budget
for and pay its Capital Contribution unless relieved of such payment in accordance with the
Interlocal Agreement.
The City’s obligation to pay its Capital Contribution shall be an irrevocable full faith and
credit obligation of the City, payable from property taxes levied within the constitutional and
statutory authority provided to cities without a vote of the qualified electors on all of the taxable
property within the City and other sources of revenues available therefor. The City hereby
obligates itself and commits to budget for and pay its Capital Contribution and to set aside and
include in its calculation of outstanding nonvoted general obligation indebtedness an amount
equal to the principal component of its Capital Contribution for so long as any Refunding Bonds
issued by the Authority remain outstanding.
AGENDA ITEM # 8. b)
ORDINANCE NO. ________
5
All payments with respect to the Refunding Bonds shall be made to SCORE in its capacity
as administrator and servicer of the Refunding Bonds to be issued by the Authority.
SECTION IV. General Authorization; Ratification. The Mayor, the City Administrative
Services Administrator, the City Clerk, and other appropriate officers of the City are authorized
and directed to undertake all action necessary for the prompt execution and delivery of the
Interlocal Agreement, and the issuance of the Refunding Bonds by the Authority, and to execute
all closing certificates, agreements, contracts and documents required to effect the closing and
delivery of the Refunding Bonds, the implementation of the Interlocal Agreement, and the
withdrawal of Federal Way as a Member City of SCORE effective December 31, 2019. Such
documents may include, but are not limited to, an undertaking to provide ongoing disclosure in
connection with Securities and Exchange Commission Rule 15c2‐12 (the “Rule”) under the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; any disclosure documents delivered for purposes
of the Rule in connection with the issuance of the Refunding Bonds and pertaining to the City;
and documents regarding to the status of any Refunding Bonds issued on a tax‐exempt basis
under the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended. All acts taken pursuant to the authority
of this ordinance but prior to its effective date are hereby ratified.
SECTION V. Severability. If any section, subsection, sentence, clause, phrase or work
of this ordinance should be held to be invalid or unconstitutional by a court or competent
jurisdiction, such invalidity or unconstitutionality thereof shall not affect the constitutionality of
any other section, subsection, sentence, clause, phrase or word of this ordinance.
AGENDA ITEM # 8. b)
ORDINANCE NO. ________
6
SECTION VI. Effective Date. This ordinance shall be in full force and effect five (5) days
after publication of a summary of this ordinance in the City’s official newspaper. The summary
shall consist of this ordinance’s title.
PASSED BY THE CITY COUNCIL this _______ day of ___________________, 2019.
Jason A. Seth, City Clerk
APPROVED BY THE MAYOR this _______ day of _____________________, 2019.
Denis Law, Mayor
Approved as to form:
Shane Moloney, City Attorney
Date of Publication:
ORD:2068:9/10/19
AGENDA ITEM # 8. b)
ORDINANCE NO. ________
7
EXHIBIT A
Form of Amended and Restated SCORE Interlocal Agreement
(attached)
AGENDA ITEM # 8. b)
AMENDED AND RESTATED SCORE INTERLOCAL AGREEMENT
among
CITY OF AUBURN,
CITY OF BURIEN,
CITY OF DES MOINES,
CITY OF RENTON,
CITY OF SEATAC,
AND
CITY OF TUKWILA, WASHINGTON
Dated as of ___________, 2019
AGENDA ITEM # 8. b)
-i-
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Page
Section 1. Definitions............................................................................................................... 1
Section 2. SCORE Facility; Authority ..................................................................................... 3
Section 3. Duration of Agreement ........................................................................................... 5
Section 4. Withdrawal and Termination .................................................................................. 5
Section 5. Administrative Board .............................................................................................. 7
Section 6. Operations Board; Finance Committee; Other Committees ................................... 8
Section 7. Facility Director ...................................................................................................... 9
Section 8. Personnel Policies ................................................................................................... 9
Section 9. Budget, Policies and Operations ........................................................................... 10
Section 10. Contracts and Support Services ............................................................................ 10
Section 11. Policy and System Evaluation .............................................................................. 10
Section 12. Additional Services Authorized ............................................................................ 11
Section 13. Inventory and Property ......................................................................................... 11
Section 14. Local Control ........................................................................................................ 11
Section 15. SCORE Facility Financing and Construction; SCORE Facility Public
Development Authority ........................................................................................ 11
Section 16. Compliance with Continuing Disclosure Requirements ....................................... 15
Section 17. Miscellaneous ....................................................................................................... 15
Section 18. Severability ........................................................................................................... 16
Section 19. Effective Date; Amend and Replace Original Interlocal Agreement ................... 16
Section 20. Federal Way Refunding Bonds; Agreement Between SCORE and Federal Way 16
Section 21. Termination of Host City Agreement ................................................................... 16
Section 22. Execution and Amendment ................................................................................... 17
Section 23. Third Party Beneficiaries ...................................................................................... 17
Section 24. Hold Harmless ...................................................................................................... 17
Section 25. Counterparts .......................................................................................................... 18
AGENDA ITEM # 8. b)
AMENDED AND RESTATED SCORE INTERLOCAL AGREEMENT
THIS AMENDED AND RESTATED SCORE INTERLOCAL AGREEMENT is
effective as of the date written below and is by and among the Cities of Auburn, Burien,
Des Moines, Renton, SeaTac and Tukwila, Washington, all of which are municipal
corporations under the laws and statutes of the State of Washington:
RECITALS:
WHEREAS, the Member Cities (as defined herein) are authorized by chapter 70.48
RCW to contract for, establish and maintain correctional facilities in furtherance of public
safety and welfare; and
WHEREAS, chapter 39.34 RCW, the Interlocal Cooperation Act, authorizes
municipalities in Washington to enter into agreements for the joint undertaking of certain
projects as provided therein; and
WHEREAS, in 2009 the Member Cities formed a separate governmental
administrative agency pursuant to an interlocal agreement and RCW 39.34.030(3) known
as the South Correctional Entity (“SCORE”) to establish and maintain a consolidated
correctional facility to be located in the City of Des Moines (the “SCORE Facility”) to
serve the Member Cities and federal and state agencies and other local governments that
may contract with SCORE in the future to provide correctional services essential to the
preservation of the public health, safety and welfare; and
WHEREAS, the Member Cities now desire to amend and restate the formation
interlocal agreement as provided herein;
NOW THEREFORE, it is hereby agreed and covenanted among the undersigned as
follows:
Section 1. Definitions. Capitalized terms used in this SCORE Interlocal
Agreement shall have the meanings given such terms in the recitals hereof and as follows:
“Administrative Board” means the governing board of SCORE created pursuant
to Section 5 of this SCORE Interlocal Agreement.
“Bonds” mean bonds, notes or other evidences of borrowing issued by the SCORE
Facility Public Development Authority to finance and/or refinance the SCORE Facility and
for any other SCORE purpose.
“Budget” means the budget prepared by the Facility Director in consultation with
the Operations Board, and submitted to the Administration Board for its approval in
accordance with Section 5 and Section 9 of this SCORE Interlocal Agreement, which
budget shall set forth (a) an estimate of the costs of capital improvements required to be
AGENDA ITEM # 8. b)
2
made to the SCORE Facility within the applicable year, (b) on a line item basis, all
anticipated revenues and expenses for the operation and maintenance of the SCORE
Facility for the applicable year, and (c) any information required by policies adopted by the
Administrative Board pursuant to Section 9(b) of this SCORE Interlocal Agreement.
“Capital Contribution” means, for each Owner City, that Owner City’s Owner
Percentage multiplied by the principal of and interest on Bonds as the same shall become
due and payable.
“Code” means the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended.
“Costs of Maintenance and Operation” means all reasonable expenses incurred
by SCORE in causing the SCORE Facility to be operated and maintained in good repair,
working order and condition, and all costs of administering SCORE.
“Designated Representative” means the Mayor or the City Manager, as selected
by each Member City, or his or her designee.
“Effective Date” has the meaning set forth in Section 19 of this Agreement.
“Facility Director” means the director of the SCORE Facility selected by the
Administrative Board pursuant to Section 7 of this SCORE Interlocal Agreement.
“Finance Committee” means the committee formed pursuant to Section 6 of this
SCORE Interlocal Agreement.
“Host City” means the City of Des Moines, Washington.
“Host City Agreement” means the Host City Agreement among the cities of
Renton, Federal Way, Auburn and Des Moines and SCORE dated as of October 1, 2009.
“Member Cities” mean the Owner Cities and, until the date provided for in
Section 20, the City of Federal Way.
“Operations Board” means the board formed pursuant to Section 6 of this
SCORE Interlocal Agreement.
“Owner Cities” mean the Cities of Auburn, Burien, Des Moines, Renton, SeaTac
and Tukwila, Washington.
AGENDA ITEM # 8. b)
3
“Owner Percentage” means the percentage assigned to each Owner City, as
follows:
Owner City Owner Percentage
Auburn 34.94%
Renton 40.96
Tukwila 9.64
Des Moines 6.02
Burien 4.82
SeaTac 3.62
Total 100.00%
“Presiding Officer” means the member of the Administrative Board selected
pursuant to Section 5 of this SCORE Interlocal Agreement.
“SCORE” means the governmental administrative agency established pursuant to
RCW 39.34.030(3) by the Member Cities.
“SCORE Facility” means the consolidated correctional facility acquired,
constructed, improved, equipped, maintained and operated by SCORE.
“SCORE Facility Public Development Authority” means the South Correctional
Entity Facility Public Development Authority chartered by the City of Renton,
Washington.
“SCORE Interlocal Agreement” or “SCORE Formation Interlocal
Agreement” means this Amended and Restated SCORE Interlocal Agreement among the
Member Cities, as amended from time to time.
“Subscribing Agencies” mean the federal and state agencies, municipal
corporations, and other local governments, other than the Member Cities, that contract with
SCORE for correctional services at the SCORE Facility pursuant to the terms of this
SCORE Interlocal Agreement.
“2009 SCORE Bonds” mean the SCORE Facility Public Development Authority
Bonds, Series 2009A and Bonds, Series 2009B (Taxable Build America Bonds—Direct
Payment) issued on November 4, 2009, in the aggregate principal amount of $86,235,000.
Section 2. SCORE Facility; Authority.
(a) Administrative Agency. There is hereby established a governmental
administrative agency pursuant to RCW 39.34.030(3) to be known as the South
Correctional Entity (“SCORE”). SCORE shall consist of the Member Cities.
AGENDA ITEM # 8. b)
4
(b) Powers of SCORE. SCORE shall have the power to acquire, construct,
own, operate, maintain, equip, and improve a correctional facility known as the “SCORE
Facility” and to provide correctional services and functions incidental thereto, for the
purpose of detaining arrestees and sentenced offenders in the furtherance of public safety
and emergencies within the jurisdiction of the Member Cities. The SCORE Facility may
serve the Member Cities and Subscribing Agencies which are in need of correctional
facilities. Any agreement with a Subscribing Agency shall be in writing and approved by
SCORE as provided herein.
(c) Administrative Board. The affairs of SCORE shall be governed by the
Administrative Board formed pursuant to Section 5 of this SCORE Interlocal Agreement.
The Administrative Board shall have the authority to:
(1) Recommend action to the legislative bodies of the Member Cities;
(2) Approve the Budget, adopt financial policies and approve
expenditures;
(3) Establish policies for investing funds and incurring expenditures of
Budget items for the SCORE Facility;
(4) Review and adopt a personnel policy for the SCORE Facility;
(5) Establish a fund, or special funds, as authorized by chapter 39.34
RCW for the operation of the SCORE Facility;
(6) Conduct regular meetings as may be designated by the
Administrative Board;
(7) Determine what services shall be offered at the SCORE Facility
pursuant to the powers of SCORE and under what terms they shall be offered;
(8) Enter into agreements with third parties for goods and services
necessary to fully implement the purposes of this SCORE Interlocal Agreement;
(9) Establish rates for services provided to members, subscribers or
participating agencies;
(10) Direct and supervise the activities of the Operations Board and the
Facility Director;
(11) Enter into an agreement with a public corporation or otherwise to
incur debt;
(12) Make purchases or contract for services necessary to fully
implement the purposes of this SCORE Interlocal Agreement;
AGENDA ITEM # 8. b)
5
(13) Enter into agreements with and receive and distribute funds from
any federal, state or local agencies;
(14) Receive and account for all funds allocated to the SCORE Facility
from its members;
(15) Purchase, take, receive, lease, take by gift, or otherwise acquire,
own, hold, improve, use and otherwise deal in and with real or personal property, or any
interest therein, in the name of the SCORE Facility;
(16) Sell, convey, mortgage, pledge, lease, exchange, transfer and
otherwise dispose of property and assets;
(17) Sue and be sued, complain and defend, in all courts of competent
jurisdiction in its name;
(18) Make and alter bylaws for the administration and regulation of its
affairs;
(19) Enter into contracts with Subscribing Agencies to provide
correctional services;
(20) Employ employees as necessary to accomplish the terms of this
SCORE Interlocal Agreement;
(21) Establish policies and procedures for adding new parties to this
SCORE Interlocal Agreement; and
(22) Engage in any and all other acts necessary to further the goals of this
SCORE Interlocal Agreement.
Section 3. Duration of Agreement.
The initial duration of this SCORE Interlocal Agreement (commencing from
February 25, 2009, the date of the original interlocal agreement relating to SCORE) shall
be for a period of ten (10) years and, thereafter, shall automatically extend for additional
five (5) year periods unless terminated as provided in this SCORE Interlocal Agreement.
Notwithstanding the foregoing, this SCORE Interlocal Agreement shall not terminate until
all Bonds issued by the SCORE Facility Public Development Authority as provided in
Section 15 of this SCORE Interlocal Agreement are no longer outstanding.
Section 4. Withdrawal and Termination.
(a) Subject to Section 4(g) below, any Member City may withdraw its
membership and terminate its participation in this SCORE Interlocal Agreement by
providing written notice and serving that notice on the other Member Cities on or before
AGENDA ITEM # 8. b)
6
December 31 in any one-year. After providing appropriate notice as provided in this
Section, that Member City’s membership withdrawal shall become effective on the last day
of the year following delivery and service of appropriate notice to all other Member Cities.
(b) Subject to Section 3 above, four (4) or more Member Cities may, at any one
time, by written notice provided to all Member Cities, call for a termination of SCORE and
this SCORE Interlocal Agreement. Upon an affirmative supermajority vote (majority plus
one) by the Administrative Board, SCORE shall be directed to terminate business, and a
date will be set for final termination, which shall be at least one (1) year from the date of
the vote to terminate this SCORE Interlocal Agreement. Upon the final termination date,
this SCORE Interlocal Agreement shall be fully terminated.
(c) Subject to Section 4(g) below, in the event any Member City fails to budget
for or provide its applicable annual funding requirements for SCORE as provided in
Section 15 hereof, the remaining Member Cities may, by majority vote, immediately
declare the underfunding City to be terminated from this SCORE Interlocal Agreement and
to have forfeited all its rights under this SCORE Interlocal Agreement as provided in
Section 4(e). The remaining Member Cities may, at their option, withdraw SCORE’s
correctional services from that City, or alternatively, enter into a Subscribing Agency
agreement with that City under terms and conditions as the remaining Member Cities deem
appropriate.
(d) Time is of the essence in giving any termination notice.
(e) If an individual Owner City withdraws its membership in SCORE, the
withdrawing City will forfeit any and all rights it may have to SCORE’s real or personal
property, or any other ownership in SCORE, unless otherwise provided by the
Administrative Board.
(f) Upon termination of this SCORE Interlocal Agreement, all property
acquired during the life of this SCORE Interlocal Agreement shall be disposed of in the
following manner:
(1) All real and personal property acquired pursuant to this SCORE
Interlocal Agreement shall be distributed to the Owner Cities based on the Owner
Percentages; and
(2) All unexpected funds or reserve funds shall be distributed based on
the percentage of average daily population at the SCORE Facility for the last three (3)
years prior to the termination date of those Member Cities still existing on the day prior to
the termination date.
(g) Notwithstanding any of the other rights, duties or obligations of any
Member City under this Section 4, the withdrawal of any Owner City from this SCORE
AGENDA ITEM # 8. b)
7
Interlocal Agreement shall not discharge or relieve the Owner City that has withdrawn
pursuant to Section 4(a) or been terminated pursuant to Section 4(c) of its obligation to pay
debt service on Bonds issued by the SCORE Facility Public Development Authority. An
Owner City may be relieved of its obligation under this SCORE Interlocal Agreement to
make payments with respect to its Capital Contribution if the Administrative Board, by
supermajority vote (majority plus one), authorizes such relief based on a finding that such
payments are not required to pay debt service on Bonds issued by the SCORE Facility
Public Development Authority.
Section 5. Administrative Board.
(a) Formation. An Administrative Board composed of the Designated
Representative from each Member City shall govern the affairs of SCORE.
(b) Allocation of Votes. Each Board member shall have an equal vote and
voice in all Board decisions.
(c) Voting Requirements. Votes regarding (1) debt; (2) approval of the Budget;
(3) employment of the Facility Director; (4) cost allocations made prior to the issuance of
Bonds; and (5) approval of labor contracts, shall require an affirmative vote of a
supermajority (majority plus one) of the Member Cities, two (2) of which shall have the
highest and the second highest average daily population in the SCORE Facility for the 12-
month period ending June 30 (or other such date as the Administrative Board shall
determine as set forth in its financial policies) of the preceding year.
Votes regarding (1) the conveyance of real property; (2) the addition of additional
services pursuant to this SCORE Interlocal Agreement not directly incidental to
correctional services (such as providing court services); and (3) matters addressed in
Sections 4(b) and (g) and Section 15(d)(2)(iv) of this SCORE Interlocal Agreement, shall
require an affirmative vote of a supermajority (majority plus one) of the Member Cities.
(d) Parliamentary Authority. Unless otherwise provided, Robert’s Revised
Rules of Order (newly revised) shall govern all procedural matters relating to the business
of the Administrative Board.
(e) Officers of the Administrative Board. Members of the Administrative
Board shall select a Presiding Officer from its members, together with such other officers
as a majority of the Administrative Board may determine. Subject to the control of the
Administrative Board, the Presiding Officer shall have general supervision, direction and
control of the business and affairs of SCORE. On matters decided by the Administrative
Board, the signature of the Presiding Officer alone is sufficient to bind SCORE.
(f) Meetings of the Administrative Board. There shall be a minimum of two
(2) meetings each year. Unless otherwise designated by the Presiding Officer, the first
AGENDA ITEM # 8. b)
8
meeting shall be held on the second Tuesday of February of each year to review the prior
years’ service. The second meeting shall be on the second Tuesday of September of each
year to consider and adopt a Budget for the following fiscal year. Other meetings may be
held upon request of the Presiding Officer or any two members. All meetings shall be open
to the public to the extent required by chapter 42.30 RCW.
Prior to January 1, 2020, five (5) members, and from and after January 1, 2020,
four (4) members of the Administrative Board must be present at any meeting of the
Administrative Board to comprise a quorum, and for the Administrative Board to transact
any business. Proxy voting shall not be allowed. Members of the Administrative Board
may participate in a meeting through the use of any means of communication by which all
members and members of the public participating in such meeting can hear each other
during the meeting. Any members of the Administrative Board participating in a meeting
by such means is deemed to be present in person at the meeting for all purposes including,
but not limited to, establishing a quorum.
(g) Bylaws. The Administrative Board shall be authorized to establish bylaws
that govern procedures of the Administrative Board and the SCORE Facility’s general
operations.
(h) Administrative Board Review. A general or particular authorization or
review and concurrence of the Administrative Board by majority vote shall be necessary
for all capital expenditures or contracts in excess of $50,000.
Section 6. Operations Board; Finance Committee; Other Committees.
(a) Operations Board. There is established an Operations Board which shall be
advisory to the Facility Director, staff and Administrative Board on operational matters of
SCORE. The Administrative Board shall establish the specific purpose and duties of the
Operations Board.
The Operations Board shall consist of up to nine (9) members selected as provided
in this paragraph. One (1) member shall be designated by each of the Member Cities, and
up to three (3) at-large members shall be selected, by majority vote, by the Subscribing
Agencies to represent the police departments of the Subscribing Agencies. At the time set
for election of the at-large members, only the representatives of the Subscribing Agencies,
then in attendance, will participate in the election. The Member Cities’ Operations Board
representatives shall not participate in the at-large member elections. The at-large
members shall serve one-year terms, unless otherwise determined by majority vote of the
Operations Board. Each member of the Operations Board shall have an equal vote in all
Operations Board decisions. The Operations Board shall be authorized to establish bylaws
and/or procedures that govern its operations. The Operations Board shall elect a presiding
officer from its members and shall determine the time and place of its meetings. All
meetings shall be open to the public if and to the extent required by chapter 42.30 RCW.
AGENDA ITEM # 8. b)
9
(b) Finance Committee. There is established a Finance Committee, which shall
be advisory to the Facility Director, staff and Administrative Board on finance matters of
SCORE. The Administrative Board shall establish the specific purpose and duties of the
Finance Committee. The Finance Committee shall consist of the finance directors or
managers of each of the Member Cities. Each member of the Finance Committee shall
have an equal vote in all Finance Committee decisions. The Finance Committee shall be
authorized to establish bylaws and/or procedures that govern its operations. The Finance
Committee shall elect a presiding officer from its members and shall determine the time
and place of its meetings. All meetings shall be open to the public if and to the extent
required by chapter 42.30 RCW.
(c) Standing or Temporary Committees. The Administrative Board may, from
time to time, establish permanent and/or temporary committees to assist in its operations
and operations of the SCORE Facility.
Section 7. Facility Director.
Day to day operations of SCORE and the SCORE Facility shall be administered by
a Facility Director, who shall be appointed by the Administrative Board after receiving the
recommendation of the Operations Board. The Administrative Board may accept or reject
the Operations Board recommendation. Such Facility Director shall be responsible to the
Administrative Board, shall develop the Budget in consultation with the Operations Board
and shall take other appropriate means in order to fully implement the purposes of this
SCORE Interlocal Agreement. The Facility Director shall administer SCORE and the
SCORE Facility in its day-to-day operations consistent with the policies adopted by the
Administrative Board. Such Facility Director shall have experience in technical, financial
and administrative fields, and such appointment shall be on the basis of merit only.
Section 8. Personnel Policies.
(a) The Operations Board shall from time to time submit proposed personnel
policies or proposed amendments to existing personnel policies to the Administrative
Board for their approval, rejection or modification. All of such modifications or revisions
shall be subject to the final approval of the Administrative Board.
(b) Such personnel policies shall provide for the initial appointment to the
SCORE Facility’s staff from the personnel presently, permanently appointed or assigned as
corrections officers in the Member Cities. Additional employees shall be appointed by the
Facility Director upon meeting the qualifications established by the Operations Board and
adopted by the Administrative Board. None of such employees shall be commissioned
members of any emergency service, but may be eligible for membership under the Public
Employees Retirement Systems (PERS), or Public Safety Employees Retirement System
(PSERS), as provided by law.
AGENDA ITEM # 8. b)
10
Section 9. Budget, Policies and Operations.
(a) The Facility Director shall distribute a proposed Budget to the Operations
Board on or before August 1 of each year, which Budget, including any amendments by
the Operations Board thereto, shall then be provided to the Administrative Board no later
than September 1 of such year. Thereafter, the Member Cities shall be advised of the
programs and objectives as contained in said Budget, and of the required financial
participation for the ensuing year.
(b) The Administrative Board shall develop financial policies for SCORE as
part of the budgetary process. Such policies may include, but are not limited to, (1) items
to be provided for in the Budget, (2) a minimum contribution amount for each Member
City to pay for Costs of Maintenance and Operation, (3) the process for allocating
unexpended amounts paid by the Member Cities for Costs of Maintenance and Operation
and assessing the Member Cities in the event of cost overruns, (4) establishing and
maintaining reserve accounts, if any, and (5) the process for adding a new party to this
SCORE Interlocal Agreement.
(c) The allocation of prorated financial participation among the Member Cities
shall be calculated as provided in Section 15 hereof. Each Member City shall be
unconditionally obligated to provide its allocable share of costs as provided in this SCORE
Interlocal Agreement.
Section 10. Contracts and Support Services.
(a) The Administrative Board (or the Operations Board or the Facility Director,
if so designated by the Administrative Board) shall, as necessary, contract with local
governments for the use of space for its operations, auxiliary services including but not
limited to records, payroll, accounting, purchasing, and data processing, and for staff prior
to the selection of a Facility Director for the SCORE Facility.
(b) The Member Cities hereby agree to furnish legal assistance, from time to
time, as approved by the Administrative Board. The Administrative Board may contract
with the City Attorney of a Member City, other local government, or independent legal
counsel as necessary.
Section 11. Policy and System Evaluation.
The Facility Director shall actively and continually consider and evaluate all means
and opportunities toward the enhancement of operations effectiveness for correctional
services so as to provide maximum and ultimate benefits to the members of the general
public. The Facility Director shall present his or her recommendations to the Operations
AGENDA ITEM # 8. b)
11
Board from time to time. Any substantive change or deviation from established policy
shall be subject to the prior approval of the Administrative Board.
Section 12. Additional Services Authorized.
The Administrative Board shall evaluate and determine the propriety of including
additional correctional services for local governments, whenever so required, and shall
determine the means of providing such services, together with its costs and effects. These
additional services may include, but shall not be limited to the following: alternatives to
incarceration, inmate transportation systems, and consolidated court services.
Section 13. Inventory and Property.
(a) Equipment and furnishings for the operation of the SCORE Facility shall be
acquired by SCORE as provided by law. If any Member City furnishes equipment or
furnishings for SCORE’s use, title to the same shall remain with the respective local entity
unless that equipment is acquired by SCORE.
(b) The Facility Director shall, at the time of preparing the proposed Budget for
the ensuing year, submit to the Operations Board a complete inventory together with
current valuations of all equipment and furnishings owned by, leased or temporarily
assigned to SCORE. In case of dissolution of SCORE, such assigned or loaned items shall
be returned to the lending governmental entity and all other items, including real property,
or funds derived from the sale thereof, shall be distributed in accordance with Section 4(f)
above.
(c) Title to real property purchased or otherwise acquired shall be held in the
name of SCORE; provided however, that for valuable consideration received, SCORE may
convey ownership of any real property as may be approved by supermajority vote
(majority plus one) of the Administrative Board.
Section 14. Local Control.
Each Member City and Subscribing Agency shall retain the responsibility and
authority for the operation of its police departments, and for such equipment and services
as are required at its place of operation to utilize the SCORE Facility.
Section 15. SCORE Facility Financing and Construction; SCORE Facility
Public Development Authority.
(a) SCORE Facility. In order to provide necessary services for the Member
Cities and the Subscribing Agencies, SCORE has and/or shall acquire, construct, improve,
equip, maintain and operate the SCORE Facility. The SCORE Facility is currently located
in the City of Des Moines, Washington.
AGENDA ITEM # 8. b)
12
(b) Contracts for the SCORE Facility. The Administrative Board shall
authorize, and the Presiding Officer of the Administrative Board, or his or her approved
designee, will execute contracts for the development, improvement and maintenance of the
SCORE Facility. These contracts may include, without limitation, contracts for
architectural design and engineering, project management services, real estate acquisition,
and construction.
(c) SCORE Facility Public Development Authority. In order to finance and
refinance costs of acquiring, constructing, improving and equipping the SCORE Facility,
the City of Renton has chartered the SCORE Facility Public Development Authority. The
purpose of the SCORE Facility Public Development Authority is to issue Bonds to finance
and refinance the acquisition, construction, improvement and equipping of the SCORE
Facility and for any other SCORE purpose. The Administrative Board shall serve ex
officio as the Board of Directors of the SCORE Facility Public Development Authority as
further provided in the Authority’s organizational charter. Upon issuance of Bonds by the
SCORE Facility Public Development Authority, Bond proceeds shall be deposited on
behalf of SCORE and used for the purposes set forth herein. SCORE shall be obligated to
make payments to the SCORE Facility Public Development Authority at the time and in
the amounts required to pay principal of and interest on the Bonds and any administrative
costs of the SCORE Facility Public Development Authority.
(d) SCORE Facility Financing.
(1) Capital Contributions. Each Owner City shall be obligated to pay
an amount equal to its Capital Contribution without regard to the payment or lack thereof
by any other Owner City. No Owner City shall be obligated to pay the Capital
Contribution of any other Owner City, and each Owner City shall be obligated to budget
for and pay its Capital Contribution. The obligation of each Owner City to pay its Capital
Contribution shall be an irrevocable full faith and credit obligation of such Owner City,
payable from property taxes levied within the constitutional and statutory authority
provided without a vote of the electors of the Owner City on all of the taxable property
within the Owner City and other sources of revenues available therefor. Each Owner City
has or will set aside and include in its calculation of outstanding nonvoted general
obligation indebtedness an amount equal to the principal component of its Capital
Contribution for so long as Bonds remain outstanding, unless relieved of such payment in
accordance with Section 4(g). Each Owner City’s obligation to pay the Capital
Contribution shall not be contingent on the receipt of any revenues from other sources,
including but not limited to Subscribing Agencies or any Member Cities.
An Owner City may prepay its Capital Contribution in a manner that is
consistent with the authorizing documents for the Bonds; provided, however, that any such
prepayment of one or more Owner Cities shall not affect the Capital Contribution of the
AGENDA ITEM # 8. b)
13
remaining Owner Cities. Any Owner City that elects to prepay its Capital Contribution
shall be responsible for paying all costs associated with such prepayment.
(2) Costs of Maintenance and Operation. Subject to the terms of the
financial policies established by the Administrative Board, each Member City shall be
obligated to pay its allocable portion of Costs of Maintenance and Operation of the
SCORE Facility, including any debt issued to finance such costs, as determined in this
subsection.
(i) Until the end of the first calendar year of operations of the
SCORE Facility (estimated to be December 31, 2012), the allocable portion that
each Member City shall be obligated to pay of Costs of Maintenance and Operation
in such year shall be equal to the Member City’s 2007 average daily population in
all correctional facilities (as provided in the SCORE financial policies) multiplied
by the Costs of Maintenance and Operation.
(ii) Commencing with the calendar year following the first
calendar year of operations, the allocable portion that each Member City shall be
obligated to pay of Costs of Maintenance and Operation shall be based on the
Member City’s average daily population in the SCORE Facility, as supplemented
as necessary with the average daily population allocable to the Member Cities in all
correctional facilities, for the 12-month period ending June 30 of the preceding
year.
(iii) Commencing with the third calendar year of operations, the
allocable portion that each Member City shall be obligated to pay of Costs of
Maintenance and Operation shall be based on the Member City’s average daily
population in the SCORE Facility for the 12-month period ending June 30 (or other
such date as the Administrative Board shall determine as set forth in its financial
policies) of the preceding year.
(iv) Commencing with the calendar year beginning January 1,
2020, the allocable portion that each Member City shall be obligated to pay of
Costs of Maintenance and Operation shall either (A) be based on the Member
City’s average daily population in the SCORE Facility for the 12-month period
ending June 30 (or other such date as the Administrative Board shall determine as
set forth in its financial policies) of the preceding year, or (B) be based on the
methodology approved by an affirmative vote of a supermajority (majority plus
one) of the Member Cities.
(e) Billing and Allocation of Revenues. Each Member City shall be billed for
its Capital Contribution and its portion of Costs of Maintenance and Operation, as
applicable, on a semiannual basis, or more frequently as determined by the Administrative
Board, calculated as provided above. Revenues received in a calendar year from
AGENDA ITEM # 8. b)
14
Subscribing Agencies or from sources other than the contributions described above shall
be allocated among the Member Cities either as set forth in the SCORE financial policies
or as follows: (i) each Member City shall receive a credit against its obligation to pay
Costs of Maintenance and Operation based on that Member City’s proportional average
daily population as calculated as provided above, and (ii) each Owner City shall receive a
credit against its Capital Contribution based on that Owner City’s proportional Owner
Percentage.
(f) Host City. Pursuant to RCW 35.21.740, the City of Des Moines, as the
Host City, hereby authorizes the City of Renton to operate the SCORE Facility Public
Development Authority within the corporate limits of the City of Des Moines in a manner
consistent with the terms of this SCORE Interlocal Agreement.
(g) Tax-Exemption. The Member Cities shall not (1) make any use of the
proceeds from the sale of Bonds issued on a tax-exempt basis or any other money or
obligations of the SCORE Facility Public Development Authority or the Member Cities
that may be deemed to be proceeds of such Bonds pursuant to Section 148(a) of the Code
that will cause such Bonds to be “arbitrage bonds” within the meaning of said Section and
said regulations, or (2) act or fail to act in a manner that will cause such Bonds to be
considered obligations not described in Section 103(a) of the Code.
(h) Additional Financing. Notwithstanding anything to the contrary in this
SCORE Interlocal Agreement, bonds, notes or other evidences of borrowing may be issued
from time to time by the SCORE Facility Public Development Authority or another issuer
pursuant a separate agreement between one or more Member Cities and other entities to
provide additional financing for the SCORE Facility on terms as agreed upon by the
parties thereto.
(i) Special Facility Designation. The SCORE Facility, including all
equipment, furnishings, and fixtures is critical to the ability of the Member Cities and the
Subscribing Agencies to provide necessary and secure correctional services and assure
public safety. Consequently, the SCORE Facility is essential to the preservation of the
public health, safety, and welfare. As a result, the SCORE Facility’s equipment,
furnishings, and fixtures are special facilities subject to unique standards. Accordingly,
based on the facts presented in this subsection, it is hereby resolved that the established
policy of the Member Cities is that the SCORE Facility constitutes a “special facility”
under RCW 39.04.280(1)(b), and all purchases of any kind or nature for the SCORE
Facility shall be exempt from competitive bidding requirements as prescribed by
Washington State statute but shall be governed by the procurement policy established by
the Administrative Board as amended from time to time.
AGENDA ITEM # 8. b)
15
Section 16. Compliance with Continuing Disclosure Requirements.
To the extent necessary to meet the conditions of paragraph (d)(2) of United States
Securities and Exchange Commission Rule 15c2-12 (the “Rule”), as applicable to a
participating underwriter or remarketing agent for the Bonds, each Owner City will enter
into an undertaking in a form acceptable at the time to the participating underwriter or
remarketing agent, as the case may be.
Section 17. Miscellaneous.
(a) Interlocal Agreement. The Member Cities agree:
(1) This SCORE Interlocal Agreement is intended to create a separate
administrative entity within the meaning of RCW 39.34.030(3) and not a “joint board”
within the meaning of RCW 39.34.030(4)(a);
(2) The Designated Representative of each Member City is appointed as
the “administrator” within the meaning of RCW 39.34.030(4)(a) responsible for
administering the Member City’s rights and duties set forth in this SCORE Interlocal
Agreement; and
(3) The Parties will file or post this Agreement as required by
RCW 39.34.040.
(b) Governing Law. This SCORE Interlocal Agreement shall be governed by
and construed in accordance with the laws of the State of Washington. If any dispute
arises between the Member Cities under any of the provisions of this SCORE Interlocal
Agreement, resolution of that dispute shall be available only through the jurisdiction,
venue and rules of the King County Superior Court, King County, Washington.
(c) Non-Waiver of Breach. The failure of any Member City to insist upon
strict performance of any provision of this SCORE Interlocal Agreement or to exercise any
right based upon a breach thereof or the acceptance of any performance during such breach
shall not constitute a waiver of any right under this SCORE Interlocal Agreement.
(d) Compliance with all Laws. SCORE and the Member Cities shall comply
with all federal, state and local laws, rules, regulations, resolutions and ordinances
applicable to the performance of this SCORE Interlocal Agreement.
(e) Continuation of Performance. In the event that any dispute or conflict
arises between the Member Cities while this SCORE Interlocal Agreement is in effect, the
Member Cities hereto agree that, notwithstanding such dispute or conflict, they shall
continue to make a good faith effort to cooperate and continue work toward successful
completion of assigned duties and responsibilities.
AGENDA ITEM # 8. b)
16
Section 18. Severability.
If any part, paragraph, section or provision of this SCORE Interlocal Agreement is
adjudged to be invalid by any court of competent jurisdiction such adjudication shall not
affect the validity of any remaining section, part or provision of this SCORE Interlocal
Agreement.
Section 19. Effective Date; Amend and Replace Original Interlocal
Agreement.
This SCORE Interlocal Agreement shall become effective on ______________,
2019, the date of defeasance (the “Effective Date”) of all of the outstanding 2009 SCORE
Bonds. On the Effective Date, this SCORE Interlocal Agreement shall amend and restate,
in its entirety, the Amended and Restated SCORE Interlocal Agreement effective
October 1, 2009.
Section 20. Federal Way Refunding Bonds; Agreement Between SCORE
and Federal Way.
The City of Federal Way (“Federal Way”) and SCORE will enter into an agreement
(the “SCORE/Federal Way Agreement”) to be dated the date of defeasance of all of the
outstanding 2009 SCORE Bonds. Pursuant to the SCORE/Federal Way Agreement:
(a) Federal Way acknowledges that the parties hereto will enter into this SCORE Interlocal
Agreement; (b) until the effective date of its withdrawal from SCORE (December 31,
2019), Federal Way will be considered a “Member City” for purposes of this SCORE
Interlocal Agreement, but shall not be considered an “Owner City” and shall not in any
way be responsible for paying any share of any Bonds or other debt obligations of SCORE
or the SCORE Facility Public Development Authority; (c) Federal Way agrees to issue
bonds and to use the proceeds thereof to repay its capital contribution with respect to the
2009 SCORE Bonds (the “Federal Way Refunding Bonds”); and (d) for as long as the
Federal Way Refunding Bonds, and any bonds issued to refund such bonds, issued on a
tax-exempt basis are outstanding (which as of their date of issuance are scheduled to
mature on January 1, 2039), SCORE covenants that it will not provide to nongovernmental
persons special legal entitlements to use the SCORE Facility in a manner that will
adversely impact the tax-exempt status of any such bonds. SCORE shall monitor the use
of the SCORE Facility to ensure that it complies with the terms of the SCORE/Federal
Way Agreement for so long as such Federal Way Refunding Bonds, or any bonds issued to
refund such bonds, are outstanding. The parties hereto approve SCORE entering into the
SCORE/Federal Way Agreement.
Section 21. Termination of Host City Agreement.
Pursuant to Section 5 of the Host City Agreement, the parties hereto agree that the
Host City Agreement shall terminate as of the Effective Date of this SCORE Interlocal
AGENDA ITEM # 8. b)
17
Agreement. As of the Effective Date of this SCORE Interlocal Agreement, Des Moines
shall be an Owner City of SCORE with the same rights and privileges as the other Owner
Cities as provided herein.
Section 22. Execution and Amendment.
This SCORE Interlocal Agreement shall be executed on behalf of each party hereto
by its Designated Representative, or other authorized officer, and pursuant to an
appropriate motion, resolution or ordinance of such party.
This SCORE Interlocal Agreement may not be effectively amended, changed,
modified or altered, except by an instrument in writing duly executed by the Designated
Representative, or other authorized officer, of each party hereto and pursuant to an
appropriate motion, resolution or ordinance of such party. Notwithstanding the foregoing,
so long as the Bonds are outstanding, any such amendment, in the opinion of the SCORE
Facility Public Development Authority or its counsel, shall not materially adversely affect
the owners of the Bonds or affect the tax-exempt status of the interest paid on the Bonds.
Section 23. Third Party Beneficiaries.
The SCORE Facility Public Development Authority and the holders from time to
time of the Bonds shall be third party beneficiaries hereof and the commitments made in
Section 15 herein shall be for their further benefit.
Section 24. Hold Harmless.
The parties to this SCORE Interlocal Agreement shall defend, indemnify and save
one another harmless from any and all claims arising out of the performance of this
SCORE Interlocal Agreement, except to the extent that the harm complained of arises from
the sole negligence of one of the participating members. Any loss or liability resulting
from the negligent acts errors or omissions of the Administrative Board, Operations Board,
Finance Committee, Facility Director and or staff, while acting within the scope of their
authority under this SCORE Interlocal Agreement shall be borne by SCORE exclusively.
AGENDA ITEM # 8. b)
18
Section 25. Counterparts
This SCORE Interlocal Agreement may be executed in any number of counterparts,
each of whom shall be an original, but those counterparts will constitute one and the same
instrument.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this SCORE Interlocal
Agreement as of the day and year first written above.
[execution pages to follow]
AGENDA ITEM # 8. b)