Press Alt + R to read the document text or Alt + P to download or print.
This document contains no pages.
HomeMy WebLinkAboutCouncil 06/04/2007 S
AGENDA
RENTON CITY COUNCIL
REGULAR MEETING
June 4, 2007
Monday, 7 p.m.
1. CALL TO ORDER AND PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE
2. ROLL CALL
3. SPECIAL PRESENTATIONS:
a. Farmers Market
b. Recognition of Hazen High School teams and a Renton High School student who recently won
State titles
4. PUBLIC MEETING:
New Life - Aqua Barn Annexation- 10%Notice of Intent to annex petition for 285 acres located in
the vicinity of SE Renton-Maple Valley Hwy.
5. ADMINISTRATIVE REPORT
6. AUDIENCE COMMENT (Speakers must sign up prior to the Council meeting. Each speaker is
allowed five minutes. The comment period will be limited to one-half hour. The second audience
comment period later on in the agenda is unlimited in duration.)
When you are recognized by the Presiding Officer,please walk to the podium and state your name
kkari and address for the record, SPELLING YOUR LAST NAME.
7. CONSENT AGENDA
The following items are distributed to Councilmembers in advance for study and review, and the
recommended actions will be accepted in a single motion. Any item may be removed for further
discussion if requested by a Councilmember.
a. Approval of Council meeting minutes of 5/21/2007. Council concur.
b. City Clerk reports bid opening on 5/22/2007 for CAG-07-072, Central Plateau Interceptor
Section 2; six bids; engineer's estimate $1,887,648.64; and submits staff recommendation to
award the contract to the low bidder, Rodarte Construction, Inc., in the amount of$1,865,890.97.
Council concur.
c. City Clerk reports bid opening on 5/15/2007 for CAG-07-078, City Shops Roof Replacement-
Building A-1; six bids; engineer's estimate $100,000; and submits staff recommendation to award
the contract to the low bidder, Stanley Roofing Co., Inc., in the amount of$113,632.90. Council
concur.
d. Development Services Division recommends approval, with conditions, of the Highlands Park
Final Plat(FP-07-016); 73 single-family lots on 18.1 acres located at the 200 block of Rosario
Ave. NE and Vesta Ave. NE. Council concur. (See 10.a. for resolution.)
e. Development Services Division recommends approval, with conditions, of the Shy Creek Final
Plat(FP-07-002); 61 single-family lots on 16.14 acres located in the vicinity of SE 2nd Pl. and
Jericho Ave. NE. Council concur. (See 10.b. for resolution.)
f. Community Services Department recommends approval to use $35,000 in project savings from
the Coulon Park structural repairs project to complete the Heritage Park construction project
(CAG-06-044) and install a future wood guardrail safety barrier along Union Ave. NE. Council
concur.
g. Development Services Division recommends acceptance of a deed of dedication for additional
right-of-way at Lind Ave. SW to fulfill a requirement of the Collier Short Plat (SHP-06-140).
Council concur.
(CONTINUED ON REVERSE SIDE)
h. Economic Development,Neighborhoods and Strategic Planning Department submits 60%
Petition to Annex for the proposed Marshall Annexation, and recommends a public hearing be
set on 6/18/2007 to consider the petition and R-8 zoning; 7.6 acres located west of Duvall Ave.
NE and north of NE Sunset Blvd. Council concur.
i. Economic Development,Neighborhoods and Strategic Planning Department recommends a
public hearing be set on 6/18/2007 to consider the proposed Aster Park Annexation and R-4
zoning of the 19.85-acre site located along the south side of Sunset Blvd. NE and west of 148th
Ave. SE. Council concur.
j. Economic Development, Neighborhoods and Strategic Planning Department recommends
approval of the revised multi-family housing property tax exemption agreement for The
Sanctuary project(near intersection of N. 10th St. and Park Ave. N.) to reflect the new ownership
entity of the project. Council concur.
k. Human Resources and Risk Management Department recommends approval of the 2007 Group
Health Cooperative medical coverage agreements for LEOFF I Retirees and all active employees.
Refer to Finance Committee.
1. Transportation Systems Division recommends approval of an agreement with Washington State
Department of Transportation for a Renton project coordinator for the I-405, I-5 to SR-169 Stage
1 Widening Project. Refer to Transportation (Aviation)Committee.
m. Utility Systems Division requests approval to transfer$150,000 from the Lake Ave. S./Rainier
Ave. S. Storm System Replacement Project account to the SW 34th St. Culvert Replacement
Project account. Refer to Utilities Committee.
n. Utility Systems Division requests approval of an agreement with King County Water District#90
for the transfer of sanitary sewer facilities in the Briar Hills area from the district to the City.
Council concur. (See 10.c. for resolution.)
8. CORRESPONDENCE
Letter from Ron Dohrn, 3767 Monterey Pl. NE, Renton, 98056, requesting waiver of the certified
appraisal and compensation fee requirement for the approved vacation of a portion of Aberdeen Ave.
NE (now 112th Ave. SE); VAC-05-003. Refer to Utilities Committee.
9. UNFINISHED BUSINESS
Topics listed below were discussed in Council committees during the past week. Those topics
marked with an asterisk(*) may include legislation. Committee reports on any topics may be held by
the Chair if further review is necessary.
a. Public Safety Committee: Red Light/School Zone Photo Enforcement Program*
10. RESOLUTIONS AND ORDINANCES
Resolutions:
a. Highlands Park Final Plat (see 7.d.)
b. Shy Creek Final Plat(see 7.e.)
c. Agreement with King County Water District#90 re: transfer of sanitary sewer facilities (see 7.n.)
d. Cooperative purchasing agreement with Seattle re: traffic safety camera system(see 9.a.)
Ordinance for first reading:
Authorizing use of automated traffic safety cameras(see 9.a.)
Ordinance for second and final reading:
2007 Budget amendment for Renton Village Storm System Project(1st reading 5/21/2007)
11. NEW BUSINESS (Includes Council Committee agenda topics; call 425-430-6512 for recorded
information.)
,, 12. AUDIENCE COMMENT
13. ADJOURNMENT
(CONTINUED ON NEXT PAGE)
COMMITTEE OF THE WHOLE
AGENDA
(Preceding Council Meeting)
Council Conference Room
5 p.m.
Emerging Issues in Economic Development and Transportation;
Council Policies;
Benson Hill Communities Annexation
• Hearing assistance devices for use in the Council Chambers are available upon request to the City Clerk •
CITY COUNCIL MEETINGS ARE TELEVISED LIVE ON GOVERNMENT ACCESS CHANNEL 21 AND ARE RE-CABLECAST
TUES.&THURS.AT 11 AM&9 PM,WED.&FRI.AT 9 AM&7 PM AND SAT.&SUN.AT 1 PM&9 PM
Li
RENTON CITY COUNCIL
Regular Meeting
June 4, 2007 Council Chambers
Monday, 7 p.m. MINUTES Renton City Hall
CALL TO ORDER Mayor Kathy Keolker called the meeting of the Renton City Council to order
and led the Pledge of Allegiance to the flag.
ROLL CALL OF TONI NELSON, Council President; RANDY CORMAN; DON PERSSON;
COUNCILMEMBERS MARCIE PALMER; TERRI BRIERE; DENIS LAW; DAN CLAWSON.
CITY STAFF IN KATHY KEOLKER,Mayor; JAY COVINGTON, Chief Administrative
ATTENDANCE Officer; LAWRENCE J. WARREN, City Attorney; BONNIE WALTON, City
Clerk; GREGG ZIMMERMAN,Planning/Building/Public Works
Administrator; LESLIE BETLACH, Parks Director;ALEX PIETSCH,
Economic Development Administrator; DON ERICKSON, Senior Planner;
MARTY WINE, Assistant CAO; DEPUTY CHIEF/FIRE MARSHAL LARRY
RUDE,Fire Department; CHIEF KEVIN MILOSEVICH, Police Department.
SPECIAL Following a display of photographs of the Farmers Market from past years,
PRESENTATIONS volunteer co-managers Nancy Hoben, Linda Middlebrooks, and Meri England
Community Event: Farmers reported on this year's Farmers Market,which takes place on Tuesdays from
Market June 5 through September 18 at the Piazza. Ms. England pointed out that 42
vendors have registered for the market, and she thanked the City, the Renton
Chamber of Commerce, and all the volunteers for their cooperation.
Ms. Middlebrooks stated that in addition to the market vendors, the market
features a children's booth,master gardener's booth, information booth, and
entertainment booth. Ms. Hoben reviewed the promotional efforts for the
Farmers Market,which include posters, brochures, banners, a website, and
e-mail marketing.
School District: Hazen High District Superintendent Mary Alice Heuschel announced that Renton School
School &Renton High School District students have recently won state titles for three events. Renton High
State Title Winners School senior Jason Harris was recognized for winning the state javelin
championship. The Hazen High School drill team members were recognized for
winning two state championships for drill and porn. Finally,Hazen High
School's soccer team members were recognized for winning the state 3A
championship.
PUBLIC MEETING This being the date set and proper notices having been posted and published in
Annexation: New Life - Aqua accordance with local and State laws, Mayor Keolker opened the public meeting
Barn, Maple Valley Hwy to consider the 10%Notice of Intent to Annex petition for the proposed New
Life- Aqua Barn Annexation; approximately 297 acres, including the SR-169
right-of-way, located south of the Maplewood Golf Course and Ron Regis Park
along the Renton-Maple Valley Hwy. (SR-169).
Senior Planner Erickson explained that the annexation area was previously
considered as part of the Maplewood Addition Expanded Annexation,but was
dropped from consideration in response to the State Supreme Court's decision
regarding the Boundary Review Board's (BRB) authority to expand annexations
without property owner input. He reported that the site is basically built out,
with a potential 41-lot single-family subdivision, and a proposed 100-unit
townhouse-type development replacing a 95-unit mobile home park.
Mr. Erickson stated that the environmental constraints of the area include steep
slopes on the south, the potential flooding of areas near the Cedar River, and the
June 4, 2007 Renton City Council Minutes Page 188
existence of the City's sole source aquifer along SR-169 and primarily west of
140th Ave. SE. Public services are provided by Fire Districts#25 and#40,
Cedar River Water and Sewer District, and the Renton School District. He
reviewed the existing King County and Renton comprehensive plan land use
designations,noting that Renton is currently evaluating its land use designations
for this area.
Continuing, Mr. Erickson reviewed the annexation's compliance with relevant
BRB objectives. Turning to the fiscal impact analysis, he estimated a surplus of
$120,139 at current development and a surplus of$69,654 at full development.
The one-time parks development cost is estimated to be $336,089. Stating that
the annexation proposal serves the best interest and general welfare of the City,
Mr. Erickson relayed staffs recommendation to accept the 10%petition and
authorize circulation of the 60%annexation petition.
Economic Development Administrator Pietsch pointed out that the 100-unit
development proposed for the Wonderland Estates Mobile Home Park site has
vested under King County regulations; therefore, for presentation purposes,
redevelopment of the site is assumed. He also pointed out that areas south of
the annexation boundary are part of the proposed Fairwood Incorporation's
second effort. Mr. Pietsch indicated that some parties may want to become a
part of this annexation,noting that Council has the ability to expand the
boundaries.
Correspondence was read from Mark Lauderback, 14068 SE 158th St., Renton,
98058, expressing opposition to expanding the annexation area to include his
neighborhood, Maple Ridge Estates, primarily for the reason of public safety.
He pointed out that emergency response times will increase as the City's police
and fire stations are located further away from his neighborhood than the
current responding stations.
Public comment was invited.
Loran Lichty,New Life Church Associate Pastor, 15711 152nd Ave. SE,
Renton, 98058, stated that the church is the annexation proponent. He indicated
that the church has an 80-year history with Renton, and he is very excited about
the possibility of being a part of the City.
Bill Hulten, 13836 SE 158th St., Renton, 98058, said he has spoken on the
interests of homeowners in the Maple Ridge Estates area becoming part of the
City since the expansion of the Maplewood Addition Annexation's boundaries
was first being considered. Mr. Hulten relayed that he recently conducted a
telephone poll of Maple Ridge Estates homeowners, noting that a majority of
those he spoke with supported annexation to Renton. He expressed support for
expansion of the annexation's boundaries to include his neighborhood.
Jerry Puckett, 15260 Oak Dr., Renton, 98058, stating that he a resident of the
Wonderland Estates Mobile Home Park, expressed appreciation to those who
assisted in the resident's efforts to try to save the mobile home park. He voiced
support for the annexation, thanking New Life Church for conducting the
petition drive.
Raymond A. Breeden, Sr., 15279 Maple Dr., Renton, 98058, resident of
Wonderland Estates Mobile Home Park, expressed support for the annexation
and offered his assistance to New Life Church to help with the petition.
June 4, 2007 Renton City Council Minutes Page 189
Antoinette Pratt, 13964 SE 156th St., Renton, 98058, requested that Council
expand the annexation to include the Maple Ridge Estates neighborhood.
Responding to Council inquiries, Mr. Pietsch confirmed that at this time,
Council can expand the annexation boundary and then authorize the petition for
property owner's signatures that represent 60% of theproperty value of the
expanded area. Mr. Pietsch pointed out the risk that the annexation could fail
due to a boundary expansion. He said it is unlikely that Maple Ridge Estates
property owners have enough time to file their own annexation petition, and
pointed out that they can ask to be removed from the Fairwood Incorporation
area through the BRB.
There being no further public comment, it was MOVED BY BRIERE,
SECONDED BY CLAWSON, COUNCIL CLOSE THE PUBLIC MEETING.
CARRIED.
Discussion ensued regarding the consequences of adding the Maple Ridge
Estates or Elliott Farms Subdivision areas to the annexation's boundary, the
vesting in King County of the proposed development for the Wonderland
Estates Mobile Home Park property, the assessed valuation of the properties,
and the consequences of allowing more time for parties to discuss the possibility
of including Maple Ridge Estates.
In response to Council inquiries, Mr. Lichty noted the church's intent to set the
assessed value total level as low as necessary to try to accomplish the task, and
its desire to move quickly and obtain signatures for the 60%petition within 30
days. Mr. Lichty said he favors working with Maple Ridge Estates; however,
he wants to be convinced that a high percentage of the homeowners are
interested since a lack of support could detrimentally affect this effort.
MOVED BY BRIERE, SECONDED BY NELSON, COUNCIL TABLE THIS
ISSUE UNTIL THE NEXT CITY COUNCIL MEETING. CARRIED.
Council requested more information regarding the following: annexation
interest level of Maple Ridge Estates homeowners, status of the development of
the Wonderland Estates Mobile Home Park, and annexation interest level of
property owners within the current annexation boundary.
ADMINISTRATIVE Chief Administrative Officer Covington reviewed a written administrative
REPORT report summarizing the City's recent progress towards goals and work programs
adopted as part of its business plan for 2007 and beyond. Items noted included:
* The Sam Chastain Memorial Fund, through the Renton Community
Foundation,has donated $2,000 to the City of Renton Scholarship Program.
* Washington State Department of Transportation has selected Renton to
receive $230,000 in State funding through the Pedestrian & Bicycle Safety
Program. The funding will be used for intersection improvements at
Rainier Ave. S. and S. 4th P1.
* At the recent City of Renton Spring Recycling Day event, 545 households
were served and more than 107 tons of recyclable material and 880 gallons
of household hazardous waste were collected.
•
June 4,2007 Renton City Council Minutes Page 190
AUDIENCE COMMENT Sandel DeMastus, Highlands Community Association Vice President, PO Box
Citizen Comment: DeMastus - 2041, Renton, 98056, expressed appreciation to those who helped cleanup the
Trail Cleanup Behind overgrown trail located behind the Highlands Library last Saturday.
Highlands Library
CONSENT AGENDA Items on the consent agenda are adopted by one motion which follows the
listing.
Council Meeting Minutes of Approval of Council meeting minutes of 5/21/2007. Council concur.
5/21/2007
CAG: 07-072, Central Plateau City Clerk reported bid opening on 5/22/2007 for CAG-07-072, Central Plateau
Interceptor Section 2, Rodarte Interceptor Section 2; six bids; engineer's estimate $1,887,648.64; and
Construction submitted staff recommendation to award the contract to the low bidder,
Rodarte Construction, Inc., in the amount of$1,865,890.97. Council concur.
CAG: 07-078, City Shops City Clerk reported bid opening on 5/15/2007 for CAG-07-078, City Shops
Roof Replacement Bldg A-1, Roof Replacement Building A-1; six bids; engineer's estimate$100,000; and
Stanley Roofing Co submitted staff recommendation to award the contract to the low bidder, Stanley
Roofing Co., Inc., in the amount of$113,632.90. Council concur.
Plat: Highlands Park, Rosario Development Services Division recommended approval,with conditions, of the
Ave NE, FP-07-016 Highlands Park Final Plat; 73 single-family lots on 18.1 acres located at the 200
block of Rosario Ave.NE and Vesta Ave. NE. Council concur. (See page 191
for resolution.)
Plat: Shy Creek, SE 2nd Pl, Development Services Division recommended approval, with conditions, of the
FP-07-002 Shy Creek Final Plat; 61 single-family lots on 16.14 acres located in the vicinity
of SE 2nd Pl. and Jericho Ave. NE. Council concur. (See page 192 for
resolution.)
Community Services: Heritage Community Services Department recommended approval to use $35,000 in
Park Construction &Union project savings from the Gene Coulon Memorial Beach Park structural repairs
Ave NE Guardrail Safety project to complete the Heritage Park construction project(CAG-06-044) and to
Barrier Fund Transfer install a future wood guardrail safety barrier along Union Ave. NE. Council
concur.
Development Services: Collier Development Services Division recommended acceptance of a deed of
Short Plat, ROW Dedication, dedication for additional right-of-way at Lind Ave. SW to fulfill a requirement
Lind Ave SW, SHP-06-140 of the Collier Short Plat. Council concur.
Annexation: Marshall, Duvall Economic Development,Neighborhoods and Strategic Planning Department
Ave NE &NE Sunset Blvd submitted a 60%Petition to Annex for the proposed Marshall Annexation, and
recommended a public hearing be set on 6/18/2007 to consider the petition and
R-8 zoning; 7.6 acres located west of Duvall Ave.NE and north of NE Sunset
Blvd. Council concur.
Annexation: Aster Park,NE Economic Development,Neighborhoods and Strategic Planning Department
Sunset Blvd recommended a public hearing be set on 6/18/2007 to consider the proposed
Aster Park Annexation and R-4 zoning of the 19.85-acre site located along the
south side of NE Sunset Blvd. and west of 148th Ave. SE. Council concur.
EDNSP: Multi-Family Economic Development,Neighborhoods and Strategic Planning Department
Housing Property Tax recommended approval of the revised multi-family housing property tax
Exemption, The Sanctuary exemption agreement for The Sanctuary project(near intersection of N. 10th St.
and Park Ave. N.) to reflect the new ownership entity of the project. Council
concur.
June 4,2007 Renton City Council Minutes Page 191
Human Resources: 2007 Human Resources and Risk Management Department recommended approval of
Group Health Cooperative the 2007 Group Health Cooperative medical coverage contracts for LEOFF I
Medical Coverage Contracts Retirees and all active employees. Refer to Finance Committee.
Transportation: I-405 (I-5 to Transportation Systems Division recommended approval of an agreement with
SR-169) Stage 1 Widening, the Washington State Department of Transportation for a City of Renton project
WSDOT coordinator for the I-405, I-5 to SR-169 Stage 1 Widening Project. Refer to
Transportation (Aviation) Committee.
Utility: SW 34th St Culvert Utility Systems Division requested approval to transfer$150,000 from the Lake
Replacement Project Fund Ave. S./Rainier Ave. S. Storm System Replacement Project account to the SW
Transfer,Budget Amend 34th St. Culvert Replacement Project account. Refer to Utilities Committee.
Utility: Briar Hills Sewer Utility Systems Division requested approval of an agreement with King County
Facilities Transfer,King Water District#90 for the transfer of sanitary sewer facilities in the Briar Hills
County Water District#90 area from the district to the City. Council concur. (See page 192 for
resolution.)
MOVED BY NELSON, SECONDED BY CORMAN, COUNCIL APPROVE
THE CONSENT AGENDA AS PRESENTED. CARRIED.
CORRESPONDENCE Correspondence was read from Ron Dohrn, 3767 Monterey Pl.NE, Renton,
Citizen Comment: Dohrn - 98056, requesting waiver of the certified appraisal and compensation fee
Aberdeen Ave NE Vacation, requirement for the approved vacation of a portion of Aberdeen Ave. NE (now
VAC-05-003 112th Ave. SE); VAC-05-003. MOVED BY CLAWSON, SECONDED BY
LAW, COUNCIL REFER THIS CORRESPONDENCE TO THE UTILITIES
COMMITTEE. CARRIED.
UNFINISHED BUSINESS Public Safety Committee Chair Law presented a report regarding traffic
Public Safety Committee enforcement cameras for red light and speeding enforcement. The Committee
Police: Red Light School Zone recommended concurrence in the staff recommendation to implement the use of
Photo Enforcement Program traffic enforcement cameras for red light and speeding enforcement at selected
school zones. The Committee also recommended approval of the cooperative
purchasing agreement with the City of Seattle to enable the City to use the
agreement's master contract provisions to execute a contract with American
Traffic Solutions.
The Committee also recommended adding a new Section 10-12-15, Traffic
Safety Cameras, to City Code. The Committee further recommended that the
resolution regarding the cooperative purchasing agreement with the City of
Seattle be presented for reading and adoption, and that the ordinance regarding
the City Code addition be presented for first reading.*
Pointing out that this is the first of many conversations the public will hear
about the traffic enforcement camera program, Councilmember Law said he is
very impressed with how the cameras work. He assured that the public will
have plenty of advanced warning.
*MOVED BY LAW, SECONDED BY PERSSON, COUNCIL CONCUR IN
THE COMMITTEE REPORT. CARRIED. (See page 192 for resolution and
ordinance.)
RESOLUTIONS AND The following resolutions were presented for reading and adoption:
ORDINANCES
Resolution #3879 A resolution was read approving the Highlands Park Final Plat consisting of
Plat: Highlands Park, Rosario approximately 18.1 acres located between Rosario Ave. NE and Vesta Ave. NE
Ave NE, FP-07-016 and SE 2nd Pl. MOVED BY BRIERE, SECONDED BY CLAWSON,
COUNCIL ADOPT THE RESOLUTION AS READ. CARRIED.
June 4,2007 Renton City Council Minutes Page 192
Resolution #3880 A resolution was read approving the Shy Creek Final Plat consisting of
Plat: Shy Creek, SE 2nd P1, approximately 16.14 acres bounded by Hoquiam Ave.NE,Jericho Ave. NE,NE
FP-07-002 2nd St., and SE 2nd Pl. MOVED BY BRIERE, SECONDED BY CLAWSON,
COUNCIL ADOPT THE RESOLUTION AS READ. CARRIED.
Resolution #3881 A resolution was read authorizing the Mayor and City Clerk to enter into an
Utility: Briar Hills Sewer interlocal agreement with King County Water District#90 related to the transfer
Facilities Transfer,King of sanitary sewer mains, manholes and appurtenances, from the district to the
County Water District#90 City of Renton. MOVED BY CLAWSON, SECONDED BY PALMER,
COUNCIL ADOPT THE RESOLUTION AS READ. CARRIED.
Resolution #3882 A resolution was read authorizing the Mayor and City Clerk to enter into an
Police: Traffic Safety Camera interlocal cooperative purchasing agreement with the City of Seattle in order to
System Cooperative jointly bid the acquisition of goods and services, including a turnkey traffic
Purchasing, Seattle safety camera system. MOVED BY LAW, SECONDED BY PERSSON,
COUNCIL ADOPT THE RESOLUTION AS READ. CARRIED.
The following ordinance was presented for first reading and referred to the
Council meeting of 6/11/2007 for second and final reading:
Police: Red Light School Zone An ordinance was read adding a new Section 10-12-15, Traffic Safety Cameras,
Photo Enforcement Program of Chapter 12, Traffic Code, of Title 10 (Traffic) of City Code by authorizing
the use of automated traffic safety cameras to detect certain traffic infractions;
adopting the standards and restrictions regarding use of traffic safety cameras in
RCW 46.63.030 and RCW 46.63.170; and setting the monetary penalty for an
infraction detected by an automated traffic safety camera. MOVED BY LAW,
SECONDED BY BRIERE, COUNCIL REFER THE ORDINANCE FOR
SECOND AND FINAL READING ON 6/11/2007. CARRIED.
The following ordinance was presented for second and final reading and
adoption:
Ordinance#5289 An ordinance was read amending the 2007 Budget by transferring $340,000 to
CAG: 07-053, Renton Village the Renton Village Storm System Project expenditure account from other
Storm System, Laser surface water utility expenditure accounts. MOVED BY CLAWSON,
Underground &Earthworks, SECONDED BY LAW, COUNCIL ADOPT THE ORDINANCE AS READ.
Budget Amend ROLL CALL: ALL AYES. CARRIED.
AUDIENCE COMMENT Diane Paholke, 243 W. Perimeter Rd., Renton, 98057, voiced her support for
Citizen Comment: Paholke- the traffic safety camera program, and inquired as to how the program will be
Red Light School Zone Photo expanded. Councilmember Law stated that if the implementation of the initial
Enforcement Program cameras is successful,the program will be expanded into other areas. He noted
that the program's goal is to change people's driving habits. Councilmember
Conran pointed out that the cameras will be installed at McKnight Middle
School,Renton High School, and Talbot Hill Elementary School, and he agreed
that if successful, the program will be expanded.
Citizen Comment: DeMastus - Sande] DeMastus, PO Box 2041, Renton, 98056, expressed her support for the
Light Rail use of light rail in this area.
ADJOURNMENT MOVED BY NELSON, SECONDED BY CORMAN, COUNCIL ADJOURN.
CARRIED. Time: 8:37 p.m.
&-rt . 1 i often--
Bonnie I. Walton, CMC, City Clerk
Recorder: Michele Neumann
June 4, 2007
RENTON CITY COUNCIL COMMITTEE MEETING CALENDAR
• Office of the City Clerk
COUNCIL COMMITTEE MEETINGS SCHEDULED AT CITY COUNCIL MEETING
June 4, 2007
COMMITTEE/CHAIRMAN DATE/TIME AGENDA
COMMITTEE OF THE WHOLE MON., 6/11 Cable Franchise Renewal Update;
(Nelson) 6 p.m. Annexation Petition Guidelines
COMMUNITY SERVICES MON., 6/11 1% for Art from Transportation Projects
(Corman) 5:30 p.m.
FINANCE MON., 6/11 Vouchers;
(Persson) 4:30 p.m. Official Newspaper Designation;
Group Health Cooperative Contracts
PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT THURS., 6/07 City Code Amendments re Tree
(Briere) 2 p.m. Retention;
Highlands Task Force Update
PUBLIC SAFETY
(Law)
TRANSPORTATION (AVIATION) WED., 6/06 WSDOT Project Coordinator Agreement
(Palmer) 4 p.m. for I-405, I-5 to SR-169 Stage 1 Widening
Project;
Customs Facility (briefing only);
Local and Regional Transportation Issues
Update;
AcuWings Letter (briefing only)
UTILITIES THURS., 6/07 SW 34th St. Culvert Replacement Project
(Clawson) 3 p.m. Fund Transfer
NOTE: Committee of the Whole meetings are held in the Council Chambers unless otherwise noted. All other committee meetings are held in the Council
Conference Room unless otherwise noted.
1
N 1 r ,- �. M
litiot,.k., . ,14' .1„ *.'. , „': ' -
Aft-''R'IVri+401 -RS
Fvo,TIT ki_.,./s_i_mr%_
M PA R I 1 ,,.
,rs-,r c' .....,•' zi „:,;:.,,, a' ,, ,.. ^
2007 � ,
'li:1" t 4
� a g y,*' x. "' Y;--4,... „. id. *re r,,� �.. s
��{ t:. Z ` ,15C�7 �' 'Bt{ t. c � �,n'iJ3 .� 3 7sr
R r
it; ,,,,,.„4” IF
i �f i ��` 'v �, e- o- 'li1'l,„ ,
elin„
1 - Vr
lift
97 4
i
�x
I "1,I �'1' �.' l .;--71,,-7_,?,-,-.7,7 •
.:1 ik 2F,lfJ �M.,9
.14i litr, - ' A I
kii
\0 5r t _ 7 r
t,,,,,,,,, ,: ,;*;7117,,, ,) ,,:;,,,.:11;',,(1
s t . z....:,,,,
�•�iA S' } a A ,'
i'. \+. E,. :G. fi'
1
%
t
.
( t
I
I Caad E �y�,.� � 1
tatoa 7?-4c
c .'����1 L�AtLk.tA)gttR .• ,,,'. ..:;..,‘,: ."'";.,..T' '..*-3 + ' ''.'Aiiltiti ' ''''4A4.1 ' iiiii
, .....*441L_ .. -
t
Sp Y-,r
•
Itoftt
I .� F 1, --1t_v� \
x
y. R \ 33
2
M
•
{
v
t ,:4`-'7!".;"".:;?-.;"'‘,11,-
„,,
li 4�t;�t'* }c;, `r
;-,,;.; !.: -..: -:4 F.,t";,,:,,,.,'' =4•'``,” :"'.,:
1 -fq .', ' rt
,,
4.
ii,i2E. c:L.,,.4„.*7 _.-.
I \-
{ ::7, ..,, ,,f, ,,
I
nom,. wy ,
'll:k,4i,>"?‘",'
gym'
:•,7,,,,,,..,,,,,I,''i•ANN.nomo7-1111111.117*. '*‘' ,' * *,*;,''',,
) ''.1,,, ,- .s,,, -:',..,::::',." :` 'k ' .: ':',. rit''' To‘' ,,',g,.y,''r
.r
y r
,'"`",' -,, k:,',4,;"0/' N
7
E _ z N. t ,w (.
,
aa.
d-
t
-,
£x ; tee,
Y� "
s
16„.',1,._P.ii,:,1**'7'','`''=-''''''fr'''4..7/".:7‘;k,
iiiimil.,,4
' Sr
i
''''';':--.7..."'.\•c7qt:T'4.1''',1' -
F E
; %
" k.,:or._,,,s_ .„.41.,,,,, ..v4,,, .,,,_bi;,,,,,,,,, ,,.N,, v,:4„,_,k,•,,,,,,.rz:,--1,iii: 4,,,,,,:„...,,,,, /.,,,„,_,..i;
' ''‘''t -- ' ' . ' '
N' '' ,f ': 7j - yr
i4
i
car 4' u � k1 � f- y
r4
,,.' ,
.„.„,,,,,,,,,,,,,..7.,..,.. / , }-,,,,,
Ych�,-� -•:-.7_',.:,--.',--
3414,4'01,i
'ri1,i 4 �..,„; ,,,-,,,•.--.-
r� .te �" L }�� : ,-Y 1.M
iNt3rot`tia� • � . . Y:T:Y � ' � r"i�� s 'iq L i,"?'- '-----77. ---"'k A� ( �
''. . i - ' mZ'ii ' '''
_ , --. )
M
{
Y"
rr
�' .>,. � M i
a k'..,7:4'
.'r _ � y
.. . , . ,..-, - ,, ,, ,,,„,,,,b,*-t: . ..
,.,,,,-4.1,1 .4.:\,i, ,... ,--- .,,,,.,:„,:if ,l,ir,,,, ''‘'.'..L
c �Y� � �F�� eF � h{ f 4e_'�•� �y j�t" kt ,'. of \ !A' �-
.,..' (t.I'l i :4 I.'',.,;: .,.'(11'..,.:I; ' '1;:.j 4'i !... ‘1.: '''-':,...
j�y�'—440 } 4 1 �-
114
a ni J. f �. YV �!! ..,, '" .,t �� 'iii;t,
'�` I
tt ..0
.� ',� rs? �` ;"`w5«.,.,;,:. --, N.71t..,,,jiiiiit,,,,i;‘,--,:..7::::-- .•'i- —
3" ,.
5
.
t.
� I
m r -,,:.%;.-:•••,.
� 4Q �l - r. s„x
° r
...:4',...:,' •••,sf‘'` • , ‘ ..i-7---
Alikilier4t4''''
i
F;w , a
,diiiii
`k; . u � S
ut!r ^,-2.,,:,
1 ` FYy y '
� ' .� +�� ---,','.',,",{`„,/ ���•'r �. is _�.. _�- .,•;z
y< .�sy@A� r same �'
Igra �a `
Is aA! l4EeTMR�`
" v i•,:'
6
�(C Y O
NEW LIFE - AQUA BARN ANNEXATION PUBLIC MEETING
COUNCIL CONSIDERATION OF PROPOSED ANNEXATION
June 4, 2007
The City is in receipt of a 10% Notice of Intention to Commence Annexation Petition from
property owners in the proposed annexation 285-acre area. The subject site is within the City's
Potential Annexation Area and is primarily designated Residential Low Density (RLD) on the
City's Comprehensive Plan Land Use Map. The proposed annexation was previously considered
as part of the Maplewood Addition Annexation but dropped in November of 2006 from that
annexation based upon a State Supreme Court ruling about annexation expansions by the
Boundary Review Board for King County. The annexation site abuts the City boundary on its
west and north. It is bordered by the Cedar River on its west, and the north side of the SE
Renton—Maple Valley Highway on its north. A portion of its northern and its eastern
boundaries are defined by the Urban Growth Boundary (see exhibit on back). Council is being
asked to consider whether it wants to accept the 10%Notice of Intent to Commence Annexation
petition for this annexation, as currently proposed, whether it wants to amend the proposed
boundaries, or whether it wants to reject this annexation at this time.
This site currently has King County's R-4 zoning on most of it with a small three acre portion
fronting on the highway east of the new bridge zoned Neighborhood Business and four sites,
three of which are manufactured home parks, zoned R-12. As part of the City's 2007 Comp Plan
Amendments package, staff is looking at new land use designations that better reflect the level of
development that has occurred here since 1993, when the Comp Plan for this area was last
updated. The Planning Commission is expected to make its recommendations known on July 18,
2007. It is likely that residential sites that are developed with higher densities could potential be
prezoned R-14, and those with manufactured housing, RMH, Residential Manufactured Homes.
Existing single-family areas could potentially be prezoned either R-4 or R-8. Areas with steep
slopes or near floodplains most likely would be prezoned RC, Resource Conservation. Only a
small portion of the buildable area remains undeveloped, although there is likely to be increased
pressure to redevelop some of the mobile home parks.
Under state law, petitions to annex are initiated by property owners representing at least 10% of
the annexation area's assessed value. Council is required to hold a public meeting with the
proponents within 60 days of submittal to decide whether it wishes to accept, reject or
geographically modify the proposed annexation. Reviewing departments of the City consider
this annexation to be a reasonable extension of their respective service areas and raised no major
objections to it.
Now
Council Hear Handout 06-04-07.doc\
NEW LIFE —AQUA BARN ANNEXATION INS
/ •a!t.i�r1111 i Eti#is'TI ; ; yip _` .ti R1
pun i�1111 rte } .�. 1:�1r Zi
ftiraMincagjah
111/1.....,IE.Fr.....113 a:+:;92,.. ,,,,,,m ity
I�
-1111111
/r . m.1- 1,M, MIVOINNO 14 i r...1 r :,-, F.7.1F1r..,,,. ,—I
W314 ,,rr 1: 111:i;;;i��,.;;;;;;]]],,, r. �+ /■Iirv;
J „a.. ., + �.. a aei *f 7►`�{M�1**"
Pte■■_ a tat Are... 4'W 4, ter`•
/"■'ril . 4111. .1 to_.......1"4074a
ir,
I �. 1111 1 .i „' -..`..,..4.;;a ti i 1/4444�1
Ewa.-- jam= j///.' .'� r }:41 g A ✓`
UIiii1i1
r :1!I e Allem 1
likiiiiill4 lie _Ad ii.fa.." ki,,,HP,,41...1.71-7 4
bio
17:11111. i �1 . N irine.,.i,...:
r+ii ir
SrW!Ili II!.ii la/C• n 14*:L4 _w �.M ,y'firi.'►/.:11'1 1'!'t1"rlr.� ���AN- ¢ru11 1r:IIIIIIIr�r=M�� �� ,,. �,_�1 W` .M■nom12 h "::1::1111111►1 , a9 es" bili:"" r=�"
"r 1111111// ?-, .Yr1r1_�• ::111111111. _ Yry.rlr 'r.,-:i:,1111111y� r ' :� ; i: sit
'�11il:frjil.'+ ly,OVIli1111NIr��4 j- • q=■1F�:r.�~_ 4.+. I i ir w+•...'Sr i�►lirr4 �, j"45•_14 1 sty�L..Ji:Iu111 al ul 1r : r� 11+ r a►+. 141.0
'1'n! �:Il1.yr: ,Ilti'I".�111rP� _ y � ' ;�•�N2�i`! /;ar��►
J`k 0 m.JunnO■,a.. s se �1r ,,,g a �x ,.
I SAF y_51'�.,'U akw4 ) 1.o a t. : :•r
'�Avai11N11:H trio' I 4 ' 4 riti: a.';: ;'ir 4'.,trf.1'�~
11 `11 twr:R1,al*Zkoi.tb7 j-.`.' _+e= i `=eye ':AP 4+ii ,ittrit
Ai
t .,,: }.{,r1,1�s�, .yam 11
lik =1• .mal• , ,r,Ia k i r d9N1 3s■+r
ytf Y J 'x�� }
,7 707P. }:�r. r4...�w
r'.� 1 g15�"._.3' 0,4 ~� fir' V_
Adibi:Vili 33 FJ
r 1111
rte' �-... ham.: . r�- .--r.. 4V91: . X 4
IIL r.^a•r•ja.t'TU �N1tIFr•`i / A alp 1�''a�i
. ���>.rfi{ff+;�� �1='-�::1u1R►;;4 1111■1
p•� �. �1ti x' a /.4x11.-.!U'.:"■'�i'h�>!.nle?I� I�
'ms•'µ!.• n ti •Ivu. Inn■�y �
pgil
"It
•
_ % it � � � mn
1 9 I
IA=..cliivim, VI likk49f1::':40:;6(24:6Ti.
. u.onII g
�i�'!; .�*� aYr iail�4rJ�►���.r�1�*lr.r11.1 ST1
p,,,,...,,,....., � f114 „`tom �r::� -p-e rr'.ilf..t:;`;; 1a• • rF /. 111i.•a►a _ �._.,,I'rf: r ��r,r` " :Ali
,Irr *'a:IIu.. �' Y-7■IIa1yer,:'r g:;; C,.7+f ,* 44r.r 1 �^.. I��,.�1,/Iuti_EA•�Jt J�ir.. � ���
ti ff 14 Its rr fid .s.'.4
3 ..4E p:■Irt''_:noiri'if rn`i 3 Q
�_1 TJLN* � tea.,1�i + f11 t \t1� F w11■-171/^.IMIr■a .l
�\a}7 4 I,/ �: • 4�rr .l� rf�11i S:JNN►ll Z E.
r+_1/ .f1� ".�y+Y" ti orary a 410 1.1-.4"."..7.11: f�l!'
Council Hear Handout 06-04-07.doc\
New Life—Aqua Barn
:� . . .A's;-. ,,,-.‘ ,
Annexation
e 3 ,, ,
° �" ,G' u` 10%Notice of intent Petition
f June 4, (I7
is
Merritt II(Phase II) '
-- 27'__—-
( lz - jAsterPark
� _,,,,,r...____
� t85ac
7—Active ,e.m�- , ' d1 Background
P 4 "
Annexations I P" 4_i
Marshall ,
LLL»l - • Annexation area previously considered as part of the
Subject site ;i11";,,,-.-..--- - MapletvoodAdditieritxpanded°Annexation
- i
=:"3 rilit 2. -1L
• Area dropped from Maplewood Addition- xpancded:;
Annexation inresponst to November;2006 State . , ;,
�.�.; n New LHe C eerily, Supretne,Court declaim'regarding BgB's autltorityto; ,'
.7ww rs
i 296
EIC.. -- expand annexations without property owner input•
, NI
_. Separate annexationstibniitted IAApril 2007` -;
•Benson NM .__ ; '
Current Annexations 9 as
1
Former Maplewood Addition—Expanded Annexation
y,;:, ',_ '-:',.. -4='=-4,,,-.*:::== ';c-qi--.= .'='' :P:'i,,i.-:,',==='-:=';-:'.===<' ;;;'.=:' •-•'i•r::i ,i Background continued
41/4-,,,,,,
-4..„ ,,3•:,:*,,, -- !!, ' • 10%Notice of Intent Petition' submitted
i
ll. .,„.
to on April 3,2007
:•„:, - : Vt: ,4'..,' ',*':,;;• . 7—' '-- :\:..'''' '
• Petition sent for certification on April
-.:-,..: :,•- -:' \ ,.,:.:,:, : •r"...,... L.: .,,,,,,.„. ,
, „ v-.• !„:,-. ' ';'4• ;: ,':;,`.,:.". ,,,, ! Ifia4'17,1',- 18,2007
• Petition certified by County Assessor's
Office on April 24,2006
• Public meeting date set May 14,2001
Maplewood Addition Expansion Areas 1500 3000 I.
Option 2 - .,. ............z.... —,--,
-_:: 1 IM I
Proposed New Life—Aqua Barn Annexation
Existing Conditions '-'..: ',•,,- : ,\
- PAA-Within Renton's Potential Anneicatioki,Atea,;3::: •-;:•-•,.:•,,.
, • ' ' ,-'•,,, ' •.,,,:,,:,-,,,•2:i ',"2 -..- .,•., n- , :'''' t.
• Location-east of Maplewood Addition and e6,1*:!: • ':,'?',,,,i i••' ' -- - :,, ,...:,,•.:, : , ...to v,I
of Maplewood Golf Course and 114-ti14g4Ilitt.';'::,:i;',7$,:'„ i,.f;•;': ri ,..,,:,.. ..;,,,;‘,..:,..:,::.. .,, :......,:.... .e.y.14 ,,.., ., ,,
along Renton-Maple Valley,Highwayka 161110
.;,,-,,,,, -.; - --.-12. le.:1_,„:17, s:,'-,:s:A: ., ,,,,,:,' .:.-.,::,',.;;::::,':::,•-:.-:
• Size-+297 acres,includitigSRAtto9RPIt„,,Atk„,,,,Sv.,
. • y't';'#;E..1r Y i ;;Yltf-i
• Uses-basically built out;potential pt I..= `11".14t',:.t 7i
l 1, 5%r.:1;rf;‘,•'.,i.-1C,SL:.,!;2'., ':,;;?.::/-113•1 ,;511-15
family subdivision;also proposed**100,44CV
_ ...._. ,.,.„, „,
apartment complex replacing a 954:Oki.flarv,olitlt
:-,:::,,,,,f-,,! i.....:::! : 2,,; •..,;::„:• , :;„--7:-:_., ,: ..---,17
,,t-L . .•%.,
(;n:, 3,;;;% ;.;1.: • •, 3::45.3,..%.!,"<1 ;•11'‘ ..; -5 1;i 5:kV' :;..„••;,.:ti4
• Boundatjes:-,annexation Sne 41:11S14.1 937T4„,.
New Life—Aqua Barn Annexation
portion of its western a4446filitewifoi i ,y. ii47,;,'s
0 1500 300
-
_
2
IvtOtegSSBg W CCC "' �' -i '`�' s t74-‘04,11i
CVPtoneerSab Idew7>fdal
,44
Candia Chnrnh vatteyFawet€3 r � , ,�V ` '
Cedar Liver atp&s Boder and lid„, Valley Lew MkIS "`t',-A•,-47.,'41-,:--
� �t
h „,,,•41;,••:”2t ll 9 l 15 3BP .y '.. k.��v ,- ,- 'S �� �' t, Y A :, S
� �� � i'''''''''',•'‘'. Vag , ; ' ' 7 ; "4 .' s ( ?- iii
h
'''''''''--'-'',;;;4'''';'',17''
"�''CJs ��� �� � � � � 6„i,„:,..;,:,, ��'*�� _;��6ii`y'x y,�, -‘ � x �
..,� u z��""`r,� - • .q` ,'t�? 1 '� v yak '.€ ,�k9i a^I -,,.- , ., ,.. �.. rc«
S .W..�� . . a� `' •.:
ig.:•,.,,,..to�t�: M� a�.a ���a,� {S"`z 3 r'� �y'z�9fi� c=F t't` a'st� ; q� ���.`1 � +p� � w
''.'k". �`' as s 5 �2 a`� 45 rg {�""'7- s tla a ,c
to iy, ' " ' :,:4.4%,`« sz 4"' , ,'ti . y '
M4,-.').''''-'f44
z t' t53i A} -' r i Z a ^ fi - t -'' ., r. ,1i -f a -
New Life Church-Aqua Barn Annexation u sw 000 i New Life Church-A ua Barn Annexation
Aenai {. 0 1s00 3. i
,.,.,..,.....-,.w,.. 9.,.... '"'.' I ia000 b Topography W ....w...,.._.. o lll4
�'1 I lxao.® I I8o0(1
F
��
�° i { •• - Environmental
Constraints
c • Steep slopes to the south dictate where development
1 cau and has occurred
j t , !w► _ • County has allowed density to be transferred front.
,,,,,....,-,,,,,--,:\
steeper slopes to valley floor,
�>>n r �'� — -_ • Future zoning should reflee t limited development ,•;.'':
z �� °t potential ofsteeper sloped areas to the south
1 tx-�`-'�` ;s P ` ' • Areas near Cedar River subject to potential floodu
ii. ; ; ji ( M i;1,;_ j • City's sole source aqui er( i'A f#1)along SR-1 9
New Life Church-A ua Barn Annexation and sity resPninan t West of es i Aim Sl t S1ig sts lG wf3t
q o soo a000 inten5lt restdential k15tS,11 this ar , ,
Sensitive Areas -- �� _
3
—,'.-• : :: .•',i
.. .
Designated Aquifer P totectitn!'.4reis'': :-; .„2..:. '
:-; :v•k,:.,,,,-44.,,,,‘-ii,li, -:.
:.„.-;.,:-.,.lor,'•-1:',v !!`;,•ii•. ':::lek•rte.11141:. • , ,.: 1 _ . . ...,... ,..,
„:
144Z;4i?-',11;''''';114'''`'e.:44" '
4.:‘.'.4'.. .....*.tfiz.17.•.i':,..:, .'..ttelit. ''.----' ''::'':' 'i ''' :- ". ,, .,,,,'....:;''',;, :....-::.;''.1.:-,, ..,
W5,;';'14--; '' ' - ::''.':-'-:!-= : ..,' ':.,-''' ' ' '..:-, :r' .--- - s, .i..,"rr-fir ',..,..-
`,...4.4.q. . .::, ..,..,... ...:::: .. .: „.,', ,',,, - ...t,;,_,..,..- .:. ,,, ...{..... . :',.'. ,-'4,•
. ..//' ''' ''''.-'.. -', ,.:- ' •' . ----'
4i , 7,74.... ../'/.- ,' '..- !..:' .-':-' ' ,...
f,i1;.
;'?,,
. ,.. . . . .
z,,E.,-.,*‘';-,ii-j-0,,,';r'4•'Alf/X.;,'..7'.,/' '''','''".'h';Ii•';S,.' :-''' • ,
. ..- ,, • , •
r',„,44..i:: IN:,,i:.3r,`:':'.., 'r---1././;‹, '' ''., •• . , . ,, ,., ,,,.,. „.
, . -... ...... ......., • , : .. , . „,
' • '''
:'''''''V'''''4WA.-447•••'''!,,",,..,,,r ..Y.,..:7'..,').4;',,, .
'.. ,,. .,-.,:` ,:r-c.,
;.,.•,pc)q.-,,,,::.-r.:,.)-tr.r:,iyi:;',,r.::.: View looking southeast on SE 133.1 Place at new' Vioneer.Plan Stt4‘451 f'11
'. '`,,',',244,‘,''''',:'",'''''''W:'• '
.. . „ .. ,
...„
.
: ::'''-'' ''''. -''''.:.• - - .4/ '” Existing Conditions,TPubli Services
•-•,,, ,..,.r. .,-.., .:‘..,
. Fire-,Districts 25&4
tr.-...,r': ,.., ,A•7:V.', ..' .5 '.- „• ..e • .,'
. .,
; , ,5"., ',.!''-::.: ' .:•'.' .::: ,' '''' ' . ..;; , Iltilitie$ ,, '
i ' ' '.:
-Cedar River Water* Sesre.,,i1;',.? ,,'''',.--..,, •- ::!,,,_
...., , _... :,... , ..
,• ,. .
-, - -„..- • ,. , . . , „. ... . • .,
, . • , .. ..5.
District is desigaated,VvrRer : , .,,.. f‘ ,
, . ,.
and sewer purveyor
' ' --. ' .:. , .• r , ,. .:., ..,
-SprnngsApanftntnte eSS ? S
r.ragit.ticis.,-.41,---i!.-''''''': - : , .- ' jr,:_.-!: ,,ly:, , .:,.....,..,14-..,:„! ,- •!..3--,-. .2.41,r-„, 4,' '''.'' ,'.
SO11001S ' ''' : ,' '.' ''' ' ''',
,!' .,.-7, ,*',,,,,,..;•: .
_within RentOts , :•:!:' •. ": •',:• ,•.'oalH ti/v:,,:,' 5'
.....::: ....A:;!....,..:44,5A,: r:::...;,t,„- -.:,-.",... .:2:';,-,f5•5-...1-,—. -. . ..=,•
SS
School District'...tir,•.!...i"-',"..4.U..:.&',/..?,.,;41.i.'1'.L:...',.-4:',.=,:','-'1,•'''.
.. ;,., :•....
.
,
1), tacrekss—Ne‘atiiciiiirei, ".kig-Y44 --;',:,..,,,, . r Si.-' '''
View looking SC43-7eas----,-..„ ,;.„,,,' „ • . ',,,- .",, , .•'' '
4
ExistingKing County Comprehensive Plan Land Use.Map
County and City-Comp.
Plan LandUse Designations': L .L„i-i - ; „=,L:,�� --_ 'I `_i,
s a Ons': _;.: =Y s
King County City of Renton.: — �'), r=i' <j�l,--ii
• Urban Res.-Med,4 • Residential.LOW f-.- /. u y
12 du/ac Density ; ,,.` , �,'\• Neighborhood Bus. • ResidentialSingler4i,
_ — -
Center Family1.-
• County Owned Open • Residential Med: ;.`c-A L
Space Density ii-s--;i i 2, !' '' `__�� ,i vp
• Commercial Corridor Il;L.'i ! "'` iI — %' .1 b
,
Maple Valley Hwy Corridor(2007-M-03)King Co.Comp Plan °„,„,,, ,,,I 0 3OOOr
Exhibit 112 a.v`n`w*+•w ANmaa„a, 1 18000 ,
•
Current City Comp Plan Land Use'Map Designations
,� 4 �,e,. �, N :.ii, 1)o..i:A ,; Land Use Related Conclusions
„i l ,,rte, - ye 1 iii,
1 t • Renton's current Comp Plan Land Use Map
C designations for area do not adequately reflect post- .
"�.. --
f -° 1993 development along highway.
''.--7----',.---„: :cam - -�
` s` a • City is currently reviewing its land use tiiap
; �' designations for this area
,1�''=it h,2-2—,A-.J..,-`_ ,t i,%T= ` , ,-',1( • A portion of the area,the former Aqua Barn site.
iiwyei li -,-,, (, , ` `'% was updated in 2006
n. • planning Corrunission recommendation expected
New Life Church-Aqua Barn Annexation 0 1500 3000 July 18,2007
Current Comp Plan „tea,,,,,,,,,, -- °.: "
0 w.mw.+=......,. o aw.um cs,..dm+m 1 I8000 -.
5
itilliiiiliiii....11111.1111111r
"" ' • ,: t ,: ::• ,- kl,,,,,';,..4,,,1
Possible Revisions to City Comp Plan Land Ube'2.,AO
LCompliance with RelLi,,,k4neBontidary,,,74::
4::z------ir;;LKi'I-:'"E !J !
t4,--t-iF
i----5- --:- Review Board 04ectiVeS
k,,,:r-li,....i,i ,
k• -.; i:-.-
,4,,;:,--,,,,A. ii _ ,Ak-,?....-_,-'k4,1/1- " iN •C' •V
--- ,4 • Preservation of natural
neighborhoods and
I - -\- '', l""---,'-: communities
'---1: ,-:"-Ir , -3) , I • Use of physical boundaries Uses ei6i 4ildp.fiysio.*,°,,,,„4:‘:.
I V. - boundaries such ds,$:RJ,0='
r--=====1)1
• Creation and preservation Service area b,, dett"le2S:` ,",
of logical service areas prit,i6usly apleed toA)t
I r: •-.,-7---. ',,,:1 II ''',N ::,tr I-,7% 'Z';77,:;;;;;-:::- p districts
MapleValleyHwy Corridor;,,',,,,- ,--,0-,... ;n----,--;:, --,:-.;-,',-L-ma, '---- • Prevention of abnormally City boundary is baeriin .,
Exhibit#60
l 0 1750 3500 t irregular boundaries pending other annexations
!.,* ` I within Ci 's P.4,4 1 .1000
Compliance with Relevant Boundary „ Fiscal Impact Analysis
Review Board Objectives:,,4,
„ , , • General Fund cost and revenue implications 1 ;•-
• Dissolution of inactive Not applkOle. ,74ere :;,,,,iss-. -Assumes potential of+41 neiv single-famd*
special purpose districts art02.,filiteit0e.T0c#:,;:',':::: homas at full developinent ::„ , :1 ,,, : :,.•
i?liireo;g4 dist;:.!PAT• .
-Assumes potential of+100(1.60,;'fo*thpixts:
• Adjustment of impractical BO?!!....zif.'' '44iitkOPAig'i:4'..
boundaries replacing+113 mobile home park
. • : 0, ,,,,,
.:--all replacing:,•'4,i7 tOlY Is "`.!i-?4'NW
Virt,1‘044;,,-.:',''' , ,,',... ,-4-.i., -Assumes new assessed home value of$500;
• Incorporation as cities or ; 4!..tm,:: !y re,OnkL,.!n:::,,w,t for single.fatitily and$280,000 for taVtilitint
towns or annexations to :1: WC, ,44 4;2i'401*
cities or towns of, ' 4n#i",..:'P14, i$:::to:(7E54,:,,,:,, -Assume'retention nr::allt;)tJStfnii4tfi,
unincorporated areas Which char',f'''1',V.,',',.:',...?:Ft;I:tTl';'0 and condo developmentilifetiOnit site•,44'
are urban in character': ' . -',,i'fie::::',:',''•-:,,,,:),-.:4'. ''‘I,F,=,,'4V;.. :"; :: "2",7 , ..,:;,,?,,-,:„.„ ,,-„,, ,.
.. „: . . ,..
6
Fiscal Impact Analysis Conclusion = ,r
Best interest and general welfare
of City served
• Furthers City Business Goals by ensuring
higher quality development and efficient arbin'.
• services
• Generally consistent with City annexation;";.''
policies
• • Generally consistent with Boundary Review •
9 i ►'' Board Objectives
Estimated one-time parks development cost of$336,089
Conclusion, continued Recommendation
Best interest and general wel£ar The Administration recommends that C aci :- ;,•,•
of Cityserved
• Accept the'certified 10%'Notice of Intantl'etitisin•.,;:�.:
• Small annual revenue surplus at full as submitted(unless modified tianightj
development •
• Authorize circulation of a 604 pirect Petitgal Q =:4`;
• Except for parks no other major service issues, annex for the 296-acre annexation:area,and: ;,
identified
• Surface Water suggestsusing County's 2002' • Support future zoning consistent
Surface Water Design Ma ival i evel lI • proposed 2007 Comprehensive'Platt"anienc t1 f` `.:
standards for future developMent;';;,,>. ; for area
7
Adjacent Residential Neighborhoods
, . a s Ug 3 ,v �L
s F .t s' ?x 4Aill'*A.,,r '� a `'•'F�t' 6i 4l1
e-
, „ , :,' '' '''' ''S.-'''''.;,,.. ft.%.'': '''::"4"''' .'!4.! ,,tv
-:--:„., ,,
--, ,, , .,,,, ‘..,,i,,,„,„,,,,,,..,„,,,,,,,,,,,,,,.,„,,,,„,,,,t,,,, A_,„,.,,..,..... ,,I,,„i.,.,.,,., .,.. I, „ ,
...
, ,. .
....;,.,.. .....,..''''' '''' '4.),,,,, it'', s, , ' "' , •',. h".-4-11,144/ 4;:l.,Nkt.4 4 '' ‘..,„,.., .4F"''",` ' .
; � c
_ , ,. ..,... .4.,1),‘,..,..4 ,.., ,,,,,,,,,i,,,,,,,.„. „.
_ !feta :,,,,4.,,„ ,.,,,,
�a%e yv� a f a,' 7
r.�, : '�!2.- ,..i "�K [ Y acv,�<.`)•-•.-.y.a �., :'.is.,.. ..«t
''1.-...?,,, _ Expansion Impact onAssessed lu s
C
h, .�: moi.'.1,1.
{ ; �AssessedVatltie 'aofRtvis
k' (AV) Total AV v.;
Maple R,dge ' .20.17% Option I $$12583'9,49467',1000576
i 53,996,15i} 67 38Qt+i• "
t-._` ','':-r..<,.�Estatcs p
Existing ^?�'::: '
;! y Maple Ridge $28,A47,QttQ2u
a,, .:-1',.!,',,'''.!: 3,?", : > ,i.,� Elliott FNms Estates j;,,s
_ :__ - Subdivision
;:�."- =A; ::p:c'",,,,•,"< Elliott Farms $46 lel ,..---: 4,.i•: fie,:;: ..
h
. lA
Option Z- � � 4,,,..i,'
-�;
New Life-Aqua Barn Annexation Expansion Option OP , °'° /°f >
Expanded •
/1,i)' ''''---?'eryr..-.• Kerri --IM�6wM,bnb' ..,.,. .. 4 4..i0,'
.......m• x. •F,,3.k"i,.�,:�>.
-iw+r . ki�•wy.L.
8
-
RecommendationRecommendation
The Administration recommends that Council: The Administration recommends that Council
• Accept the certified 10%Notice of Intent` • Accept the certified 10%Notice of Intent Petition ,
Petition as modified with the inclusion of °'- as modified with the inclusion of Maple Ridge
Maple Ridge EstatesEstates and Elliott Farms Subdivision
• Authorize circulation of a 60%'Direct Petition , • Authorize circulation of a 60%Direct Petition to
to annex for the 296-acre annexation area,and annex for the 296-acre annexation area,and
• Support future zoning consistent with currently • Support future zoning consistent with currently
proposed 2007 Comprehensive Plan proposed 2007 Comprehensive Plan
amendments for area amendments for area
9
0,4,bl f(eetlh5 C.orvespo idence-
6-y aoo7
04 June 2007 Tfe m y
14068 SE 158th Street, (Maple Ridge Estates) CITY OF TON
Renton, WA 98058 JUN 0 4 2007
Tel: 425-430-9388
RECEIVED
CITY CLERK'S OFFICE
The City of Renton
City Council Members V as X
1055 S. Grady Way
Renton, WA 98057
Dear Renton City Council,
I am unable to attend tonight's public meeting, but respectful request that this letter be
included in your consideration regarding the Aquabarn Annexation. My neighborhood,
the Maple Ridge Estates, is currently NOT in the proposed annexation area set forth by
the King County Boundary Review Board. However, our neighborhood association
newsletter recently advised that if there was public support in our neighborhood, you may
still consider our neighborhood in the proposed annexation. I am strongly apposed to our
neighborhood being annexed into Renton,primarily for the reason of public safety.
Fire District 40 Fire Chief Paul Witt spoke at one of the King County Review Board
meetings last year and confirmed that Renton annexing our specific neighborhood would
result in the City of Renton's Fire Department serving our neighborhood. Although he
commended Renton's Fire department, he did state their nearest fire stations are
considerably further away than Fire District 40's station at 14810 SE Petrovitsky Road.
This station is approximately 1.8 miles from my house. In comparison, Renton's nearest
fire station is Renton Fire Station 16 at 12923 156th Ave SE, approximately 3.3 miles
from my house.
In addition to Fire Protection, police response is also extremely critical. The King County
Sheriff's office has a police substation at, 14215 SE Petrovisky Road, approximately 1.4
miles from my house, while Renton's police station at 1055 South Grady Way,is
approximately 3.8 miles from my house.
In both fire and police protection Renton services are further away in distance. Further
distance away equals minutes in response time and MINUTES SAVE LIVES! I believe
that this was a primary reason for the King County Boundary Review Board leaving our
neighborhood outside of the Renton Annexation area. I strongly hope you will agree with
and abide by King County's decision and not annex the Maple Ridge Estates into Renton.
Sincerely,
Mark Lauderback
z 'd 88E8OEiSa0 )1Jew d60 =E0 LO 00 un[
�tiCv O ADMINISTRATIVE, JUDICIAL, AND
• ® + LEGAL SERVICES DEPARTMENT
• MEMORANDUM
DATE: June 4, 2007
TO: Toni Nelson, Council President
Members of the Renton City Council
FROM: Kathy Keolker, Mayor
Jay Covington, Chief Administrative Officer
SUBJECT: Administrative Report
In addition to our day-to-day activities, the following items are worthy of note for this week:
GENERAL INFORMATION
• Come join the fun as the sixth season of the Renton Farmers Market begins on Tuesday, June
5th! City Council President Toni Nelson will be on hand to ring the official starting bell for the
opening of the market at 3:00 p.m. Enjoy locally grown fresh produce, fruit, and flowers; taste
local restaurant samples at 4:30; and enjoy live entertainment at 5:30. Visit the Farmers Market
every Tuesday at Piazza Park at South 3rd Street and Burnett Avenue South, 3:00 to 7:00 p.m.,
from June 5th through September 18th. For more information, call 425-679-1502 or visit
www.rentonfarmersmarket.com. The Renton Farmers Market is presented by Piazza Renton,
the City of Renton, and the Renton Chamber of Commerce.
COMMUNITY SERVICES DEPARTMENT
• We are pleased to announce that the Sam Chastain Memorial Fund, through the Renton
Community Foundation, has donated $2,000 to the City of Renton Recreation Scholarship
Program. This program provides low-income individuals and families opportunities to
participate in City of Renton programs through the Community Services Department, including
summer day camps, arts and crafts, fitness, sports, science projects, dance and music, and
computer classes for Renton senior citizens. The Scholarship Program is not supported by tax
dollars. Its success is dependent upon the generosity of service groups, individuals, and the
Renton community. To contribute, call Gloria Gamba at 425-430-6600. Your donation will
provide a memorable experience for Renton residents of all ages.
ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT, NEIGHBORHOODS & STRATEGIC
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
• Do you or your customers, family members, or friends have problems finding their way around
downtown Renton? Do you find it difficult to direct visitors around downtown to the nearest
parking lot or specific businesses? The City of Renton is working to create better signage that
will direct people into and around downtown as well as connect it with The Landing. Signage
can also create a cohesive identity for our downtown and could provide opportunities for public
art. We need to hear your ideas to improve finding our way around downtown and what will
work best for downtown Renton. Join us for one of two public meetings to provide input now,
before signage is designed. Meetings will be held Thursday, June 7th, at 6:30 p.m. and Friday,
June 8th, at 8:30 a.m. at Merrill Gardens Retirement Community, 104 Burnett Avenue South. If
Administrative Report
June 4,2007
Page 2
you have questions or can't make the meeting, contact Jennifer Davis Hayes at 425-430-6589 or
jdavishayes@ci.renton.wa.us.
PLANNING/BUILDING/PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT
• The City of Renton has been selected by the Washington State Department of Transportation to
receive $230,000 in state funding through the Pedestrian & Bicycle Safety Program. The
funding will be used for intersection improvements at Rainier Avenue South and South 4th
Place. Future improvements could include sidewalk modifications, signal upgrades, and
additional ADA ramps. The specific improvements will be determined during the design phase
of the project.
• At the recent City of Renton Spring Recycling Day event, 545 households were served and
more than 107 tons of recyclable materials and 880 gallons of household hazardous waste were
collected. This very successful event, held May 12th in a Renton Technical College parking lot,
was made possible by the combined efforts of the City of Renton Solid Waste Utility,
Maintenance Services, Waste Management, and 15 very dedicated volunteers.
CITY OF RENTON COUNCIL AGENDA BILL
AI#: 17.
Submitting Data: For Agenda of:
Dept/Div/Board.. AJLS/City Clerk June 4, 2007
Staff Contact Bonnie Walton Agenda Status
Consent X
Subject: Public Hearing..
Bid opening on May 22, 2007, for CAG-07-072, Correspondence..
Central Plateau Interceptor Section 2 Project Ordinance
Resolution
Old Business
Exhibits: New Business
Staff Recommendation Study Sessions
Bid Tabulation Sheet (6 bids) Information
Recommended Action: Approvals:
Legal Dept
Council concur Finance Dept
Other
Fiscal Impact:
Expenditure Required... $1,865,890.97 Transfer/Amendment
Amount Budgeted Revenue Generated •
Total Project Budget $2,225,000 City Share Total Project..
SUMMARY OF ACTION:
Engineer's Estimate: $1,887,648.64
In accordance with Council procedure, bids submitted at the subject bid opening met the
following three criteria: there was more than one bid, the low bid was within the project budget,
and there were no irregularities. Therefore, staff recommends acceptance of the low bid
submitted by Rodarte Construction, Inc. in the amount of$1,865,890.97.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
Accept the low bid submitted by Rodarte Construction, Inc. in the amount of$1,865,890.97.
r
w- CITY OF RENTON
PLANNING/BUILDING/PUBLIC WORKS
MEMORANDUM
DATE: May 23, 2007
TO: Bonnie Walton, City Clerk
FROM: John Hobson, Wastewater Engineer (ext. 7279) iS
SUBJECT: Central Plateau Interceptor Section 2 Bid Award
The Planning/Building/Public Works Department has reviewed the bids submitted for the
Central Plateau Interceptor Section 2 project and recommends that the bid be awarded to Rodarte
Construction Inc. We are requesting that an agenda bill for "Council Concur" be prepared for
the June 4, 2007, Council Meeting.
The bid opening was on Tuesday, May 22, 2007. There were 6 bids received. There were no
irregularities in any of the bids. The low bidder is Rodarte Construction Inc., with a bid of
$1,865,890.97. The engineer's estimate was $1,887,648.64.
The project budget amount is $2,225,000. The low bid is within the existing budget.
The project will install approximately 86 linear feet of new 18", 3,126 linear feet of 15", 1,777
linear feet of 12", and 270 linear feet of 8" diameter sanitary sewer mains.
\V 'WWP-27-3235 Central Plateau Int Phase IPA ssard-('lerk-('entPlatlnt2 dux
CITY OF RENTON
BID TABULATION SHEET
vitrio
PROJECT: Central Plateau Interceptor Section 2; CAG-07-072
DATE: May 22, 2007
FORMS
BID
BIDDER Bid Combined Proposal/
Bond Addendum Triple Form
Ceccanti
4116 Brookdale Rd. F.
Tacoma, WA 98446
Rick Ceccanti X X X 52,574,144.13
J.W. Fowler Company
P.O. Box 489
12775 Westview Dr.
Dallas, OR 97338
John Fowler X X X $2,939,311.73
Rodarte Construction, Inc.
P.O. Box 1875
Auburn, WA 98071-1875
JR Rodarte X X X 51,865,890.97
R.L. Alia Company
107A Williams Ave. S. '44.110
Renton, WA 98057
Richard I.. Alia X X X 52,193.933.43
Shoreline Construction Company
P.O. Box 358
Woodinville, WA 98072-0358
Douglas.1. Suzuki X X X 52,227.073.61
Wcstwater Construction Company
31833 Kent Black Diamond Rd.
Auburn, WA 98092
Thomas J. Caples X X X $2,884,274.22
ENGINEER'S ESTIMATE 'TOTAL: $1,887,648.64
14.0
LEGEND
Forms:Triple Form Non-Collusion AFlida\it,Anti-Trust Claims,Minimum Wage
dl
CITY OF RENTON COUNCIL AGENDA BILL
Ai#: /: e.
�✓ Submitting Data: For Agenda of:
Dept/Div/Board.. AJLS/City Clerk June 4, 2007
Staff Contact Bonnie Walton Agenda Status
Consent X
Subject: Public Hearing..
Bid opening on May 15, 2007, for CAG-07-078, Correspondence..
City Shops Roof Replacement - Building A-1 Project Ordinance
Resolution
Old Business
Exhibits: New Business
Staff Recommendation Study Sessions
Bid Tabulation Sheet (6 bids) Information
Recommended Action: Approvals:
Legal Dept
Council concur Finance Dept
Other
Fiscal Impact:
Expenditure Required... $113,632.90 Transfer/Amendment
likie Amount Budgeted Revenue Generated
Total Project Budget $120,000 City Share Total Project..
SUMMARY OF ACTION:
Engineer's Estimate: $100,000
In accordance with Council procedure, bids submitted at the subject bid opening met the
following three criteria: there was more than one bid, the low bid was within the project budget,
and there were no irregularities. Therefore, staff recommends acceptance of the low bid
submitted by Stanley Roofing Co., Inc. in the amount of$113,632.90.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
Accept the low bid submitted by Stanley Roofing Co., Inc. in the amount of$113,632.90.
0
‘e COMMUNITY SERVICES
• ® • DEPARTMENT
MEMORANDUM
DATE: May 22, 2007
TO: Bonnie Walton, City Clerk
FROM: Greg Stroh, Facilities Manager, ext. 6614
SUBJECT: Roof Replacement for Renton City Shops A-1 and A-2
Buildings
Roof Replacement for Renton City Shops A-1 and A-2 Buildings, the bid opening was
held on May 15, 2007, at 2:30 PM. Six (6) bids were submitted. The base bids ranged
from a low of$113,632.90 to a high of$161,078.34. The additive alternate bids ranged
from a low of$74,781.63 to a high of$101,789.91. Given the range of bids received for
base bid and additive alternate and the limited project budget, we have narrowed the
project to the base bid portion of work only (Building A-1 only).
The low bid for the project was $ 113,632.90, including WSST from Stanley Roofing
Co., Inc. Our staff has reviewed the low bid for completeness, inclusion of all required
forms, acknowledgments of addenda and mathematical correctness of the bid. All of the
paper work is in order.
• Funding for the project is under account number
316.000000.020.5940.0076.63.000002 Capital Improvement Program, Major
Maintenance/Operational Facilities.
• The approved 2007 CIP budget for the project is $120,000.
The Facilities Division, therefore recommends that this item be placed on the June 4,
2007, consent agenda for Council concur. Staff further recommends that Council award
the contract to the low bidder, Stanley Roofing Co., Inc., for the amount of$113,632.90.
If you have any questions please contact Greg Stroh at x-6614
city shops roof city clerk memol.doc
CITY OF RENTON
BID TABULATION SHEET
PROJECT: City Shops Roof Replacement- Buildings A-1 and A-2; CAG-07-078
DATE: May 15, 2007
FORMS
BID
BIDDER Bid Triple Addenda
Bond Form 3
Lloyd A. Lynch, Inc. X X 1 &2 Base Bid: $126,301.13
PO Box 1305 Additive Alternate: $74,781.63
Woodinville, WA 98072-1305
Lynn A. Lynch
Pacific Tech Construction, Inc. X X X Base Bid: $117,486.00
1401 Industrial Way, Suite 400 Additive Alternate: $81,349.00
Longview, WA 98632
Douglas P. Yeaman
Queen City Sheet Metal & Roofing, Inc. X X X Base Bid: $161,078.34
1711 Occidental Ave. S. Additive Alternate: $101,789.91
Seattle, WA 98134-1411
Diane H. Puetz
Snyder Rooting X X 1 & 2 Base Bid: $144,659.00
20203 Broadway Ave. Additive Alternate: $99,526.00
Snohomish, WA 98296
Nigel Chiddick
Stanley Rooting Co., Inc. X X X Base Bid: $113,632.90
19710- I44th Ave. NE Additive Alternate: $75,263.49
Woodinville, WA 98072
Mike Burns
Wright Rooting, Inc. X X X Base Bid: $124,581.60
PO Box 9339 Additive Alternate: $86,847.75
Tacoma, WA 98490
Jennifer Wright
ENGINEER'S ESTIMATE TOTAL: $100,000- Base Bid
LEGEND:
Forms:Triple Form. Non-Collusion Affidavit,Anti-Trust Claims,Minimum Wage
CITY OF RENTON COUNCIL AGENDA BILL
AI#:
{ Submitting Data: Planning/Building/Public Works For Agenda of: June 4, 2007
Dept/Div/Board.. Development Services Division
Staff Contact Mike Dotson X-7304 Agenda Status
Consent X
Subject: Public Hearing..
Highlands Park Final Plat. Correspondence.. Ordinance
File Number: LUA 07-016 FP (Preliminary Plat LUA Resolution X
05-124). Old Business
Exhibits: New Business
1. Resolution and legal description. Study Sessions
2. Staff Report and Recommendation. Information
Recommended Action: Approvals:
Council Concur Legal Dept X
Finance Dept
Other
Fiscal Impact: N/A
Expenditure Required... Transfer/Amendment
Amount Budgeted Revenue Generated
Total Project Budget City Share Total Project..
SUMMARY OF ACTION:
The recommendation for approval of the referenced final plat is submitted for Council action.
This final plat subdivides 73 single-family residential lots with sanitary sewer, storm drainage,
street lighting, curb and gutter, sidewalks and street improvements. Design and construction of
utilities, lighting and pavement will be approved, accepted or deferred (and a security device
posted) as required through Planning/Building/Public Works prior to recording the plat. All
conditions placed on the preliminary plat by the City of Renton will be met prior to recording the
plat.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
Approve the Highlands Park Final Plat, LUA 07-016 with the following conditions and adopt the
resolution:
1. All plat fees shall be paid prior to recording the plat.
2. All plat improvements shall be either constructed or deferred to the satisfaction of City staff
prior to recording the plat.
C:\Documents and Settings\User\Desktop\Highland Park AGNBHPII2.doc/
CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON
RESOLUTION NO.
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON,
APPROVING FINAL PLAT (HIGHLANDS PARK, FILE NO. LUA-07-
016FP).
WHEREAS, a petition for the approval of a final plat for the subdivision of a certain tract
of land as hereinafter more particularly described, located within the City of Renton, has been duly
approved by the Planning/Building/Public Works Department; and
WHEREAS, after investigation, the Administrator of the Planning/Building/Public Works
Department has considered and recommended the approval of the final plat, and the approval is
proper and advisable and in the public interest; and
WHEREAS, the City Council has determine that appropriate provisions are made for the
NNW
public health, safety, and general welfare and for such open spaces, drainage ways, streets or
roads, alleys, other public ways, transit stops, potable water supplies, sanitary wastes, parks and
recreation, playgrounds, schools, school grounds, sidewalks and other planning features that
assure safe walking conditions for students who walk to and from school; and
WHEREAS, the City Council has determined that the public use and interest will be
served by the platting of the subdivision and dedication;
NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RENTON,
WASHINGTON, DOES RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS:
SECTION I. The above findings are true and correct in all respects.
SECTION H. The final plat is hereby approved pertaining to the following described
real estate, to wit:
1
RESOLUTION NO.
(The property, consisting of approximately 18.1 acres, is located *4410
between Rosario Ave. NE and Vesta Ave. NE and SE 2"d Pl.)
Such plat is subject to the laws and ordinances of the City of Renton and subject to the findings,
conclusions and recommendation of the Planning/Building/Public Works Department dated
May 22, 2007.
PASSED BY THE CITY COUNCIL this day of , 2007.
Bonnie I. Walton, City Clerk
APPROVED BY THE MAYOR this day of , 2007.
Kathy Keolker, Mayor
Approved as to form:
Lawrence J. Warren, City Attorney
RES.1271:5/25/07:ch
440
2
EXHIBIT A
LEGAL DESCRIPTION
PARCEL A:
LOT 1, KING COUNTY SHORT PLAT NUMBER 678063-R, RECORDED UNDER RECORDING NUMBER
7812110857.
PARCEL B:
THAT PORTION OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF SECTION 14,
TOWNSHIP 23 NORTH, RANGE 5 EAST, WILLAMETTE MERIDIAN, IN KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON,
DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS:
BEGINNING AT A POINT NORTH 00°28' 02" WEST A DISTANCE OF 30.00 FEET AND NORTH
88°55'44" WEST A DISTANCE OF 30.00 FEET FROM THE CENTER OF SAID SECTION 14;
THENCE ALONG THE WESTERLY MARGIN OF THE AUGUST GERBER ROAD (156TH AVENUE
SOUTHEAST) AS CONVEYED TO KING COUNTY BY DEED RECORDED UNDER RECORDING NUMBER
1094241, NORTH 00°28' 02" WEST A DISTANCE OF 472.53 FEET TO THE TRUE POINT OF
BEGINNING OF THE TRACT HEREIN DESCRIBED;
THENCE CONTINUING NORTH 00°28'02" WEST A DISTANCE OF 157.51 FEET;
THENCE NORTH 89°01' 16" WEST A DISTANCE OF 1248 .07 FEET TO THE EAST LINE OF THE
WEST 30.00 FEET OF SADI SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER;
THENCE ALONG SAID EAST LINE SOUTH 00°33'02" EAST A DISTANCE OF 157.07 FEET;
THENCE SOUTH 88°59' 57" EAST A DISTANCE OF 1247.82 FEET TO THE TRUE POINT OF
BEGINNING;
EXCEPT THOSE PORTIONS CONVEYED TO FRANKLIN T. TETER AND C. LENA TETER, HUSBAND
AND WIFE, BY DEEDS RECORDED UNDER RECORDING NUMBERS 6400741 AND 6417877.
PARCEL C:
PARCEL A, CITY OF RENTON LOT LINE ADJUSTMENT NUMBER LUA-06-052-LLA, HIGHLANDS
PARK, RECORDED UNDER RECORDING NUMBER 20061011900002, IN KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON.
PARCEL D:
LOT 4, KING COUNTY SHORT PLAT NUMBER 484106, RECORDED UNDER RECORDING NUMBER
8505170617.
r'trr0
44
c
12
4 3 2
5 INSET e1-W D
NE AKS QUAN R . e_ T 1S
-- v V„IV' 900 REN
Q
8 9 10 . = 11
W
REN TON
NE 4111 ST SITE
11111111 ,
NE 3R9
6f
GREENWOOD W
SE 132ND ST
CEMETERY
17 16 16 15 �, SE 2ND PL. �-- ",C
14
E � : TN
, tn
C , �, MAPLEWOOD o
GOLF COURSE oc
VICINITY MAP
1" . .3000'±
DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DIVISION
BUILDING/PLANNING/PUBLIC WORKS
CITY OF RENTON
STAFF REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS
APPLICANT: Stephen J. Schrei
Burnstead Construcion, Co.
Highlands Park Final Plat.
File: LUA 07-016, FP
LOCATION: 200 Blk Rosario Ave NE and Vesta Ave NE.
Section 14, Twp. 23 N., Rng 5 E, W.M.
SUMMARY OF REQUEST: Final Plat for 73 single-family residential
lots with water, sanitary sewer, storm, street
and lighting.
RECOMMENDATION: Approve With Conditions
FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS & RECOMIM1ENDATION
Having reviewed the record documents in this matter, staff now makes and enters the
following:
FINDINGS:
1. The applicant, Burnstead Construction, Co, filed a request for approval of Kristen
Woods, a 73-lot Final Plat.
2. The yellow file containing all staff reports, the State Environmental Policy Act
(SEPA) documentation and other pertinent materials was entered into the record
as Exhibit No. 1.
3. The Environmental Review Committee (ERC), the City's responsible official,
issued a Determination on Non-Significance-Mitigated (DMA-M).
4. All appropriate City of Renton personnel reviewed the subject proposal.
5. The new plat is located in Section Section 14, Twp. 23 N., Rng 5 E, W.M.. The
subject site is located at 200 Blk Rosario Ave NE and Vesta Ave NE.
N'" 6. The subject site is comprised of a parcel of 18.1 acres.
7. The Preliminary Plat (LUA-05-124) was approved by the City of Renton Council `'
on October 10, 2005.
8. The site is zoned R-8 (Single Family— 8 dwelling units/acre).
9. The Final Plat complies with both the Zoning Code and the Comprehensive Plan.
As a condition of Final Plat submittal, the following items address the conditions of plat
approval from the Hearing Examiner's decision approved by the City Council. The
conditions of the Plat Approval and actions taken are summarized below.
ERC CONDITION COMPLIANCE:
The application has complied with the requirements of the Revised Determination of
Non-Signifcance-Mitigated that was issued by the ERC on February 6, 2006 (conditions
to follow):
1) The applicant shall comply with the recommendations contained within the
geotechnical report dated October 10, 2005, prepared by Terra Associates, Inc.
• The developer will monitor all site preparation and earthwork to insure
compliance with the recommendations of the geotechnical report and the
approved construction plans.
2) The applicant shall pay the appropriate Fire Mitigation Fee based on a rate of$488.00
per new single-family lot prior to the recording of the final plat.
3) The applicant shall pay the appropriate Traffic Mitigation Fee based on $75.00 per
each new average daily trip associated with the project prior to the recording of the
final plat.
4) The applicant shall pay the appropriate Parks Mitigation Fee based on $530.76 per
new single-family lot prior to the recording of the final plat.
• All required fees tit'ill he paid prior to the recording of the final plat.
5) The project shall comply with the 2005 King County Surface Water Design Manual
for both detention (Conservation Flow Control -- Level 2) and water quality facilities.
• The approved construction plans have been prepared to comply with these
requirements.
6) Clearing and grading activities shall comply with the tree retention plan dated January
26, 2006, in order to preserve at least 25% of existing significant trees on the site.
• The approved construction plans have been prepared to comply with these
requirements.
Hearing Examiner Conditions (items 2-7 from the May 18, 2006 Recommedation):
1) The applicant shall submit a fencing plan for the storm water detention pond (Tract
997). Fencing shall be consistent with the requirements of the King County Surface
Water Design Manual. The satisfaction of these requirements shall be subject to the
review and approval of the Development Services Division prior to the recording of
the final plat.
• This condition will be met by action taken by the developer.
2) A 6-foot paved pedestrian walkway connection, to be located within the existing
recorded access easement, shall be provided from Vesta Avenue SE through proposed
Tract 998 (park) to the internal plat road. This walkway shall be shown on the final
plat. The easement shall not interfere with the existing third party easement in that
location.
• The required walkway will he constructed as a part of the site development. The
required easement has been shown on the final plat.
3) The applicant shall be required to provide a Temporary Erosion and Sedimentation
Control Plan (TESCP) designed pursuant to the Department of Ecology's Erosion and
Sediment Control Requirements, outlined in Volume II of the 2001 Stormwater
Management Manual, and to provide staff with a Construction Mitigation Plan prior
to issuance of construction permits.
• The required plans have been provided and approved by the City.
4) "If the applicant wishes to make minor adjustments to lots in the vicinity of the
southerly portion of the site based upon the land area that would be gained by a
vacation of the portion of the Rosario Avenue S.E. unimproved right-of-way that had
been the subject of City of Renton Vacation File No. VAC-05-004 (ultimately
withdrawn), the applicant shall (a) file a new vacation application, (b) submit an
application for a minor amendment to the preliminary plat, and (c) finalize and record
the vacation prior to or concurrent with the recording of the final plat."
• The developer does not wish to pursue a vacation of the right-of-way.
41210
5) A homeowner's association or maintenance agreement shall be created concurrently
with the recording of the final plat in order to establish maintenance responsibilities
for shared roadway, stormwater and utility improvements. A draft of the document(s)
shall be submitted to the City of Renton Development Services Division for review
and approval by the City Attorney and Property Services section prior to the recording
of the final plat.
• This condition will be met by action taken by the developer. A copy of the CC&Rs
will be provided to the City for review prior to final plat approval.
6) The applicant shall resolve the adverse possession claim and adjust lot sizes if
necessary to accommodate any property transfer.
• A lot line adjustment has been processed and approved to resolve the boundary
issue.
CONCLUSIONS:
The Final Plat generally appears to satisfy the conditions imposed by the preliminary plat
process and therefore should be approved by the City Council.
RECOMMENDATION:
l. The City Council to approve the Final Plat with the following conditions:
a) All plat fees shall be paid prior to the recording of the plat.
b) All plat improvements shall be either constructed or deferred to the
satisfaction of City staff prior to the recording of the plat.
SUBMITTED THIS 23rd DAY OF May 2007.
!
71:4/ �• `
MIKE DOTSON
DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DIVISION
cc Kavrcn Kittrick
1_11A-07-016-FP
4,400 EXHIBIT "B"
MAP OF PROPERTY
r - - --- - - _ _ _ 1488'10'5_0"W :`
1309 33 _
____L1
1
I
L.1
I�
ICJ
O O
O O
I 0 N
1 • c0
C'J
O
(n 7
CV I
•
L-7-30.01
,, _ N88'04 40"W {
1098.61
15 17
co 20
I
Ln 180.01 a
13 -
o� --- 18 19
12
NE 1ST ST -21 22 24 26 29 (° o
L5
11 4 TP 998 �-
TR ggy 8 V`� 39
II
IOW
10 g - 37 36 34 30
_ < 40
N d�
-i N vi
W 31 11
v cm
0 0
I� cn 6 41 _ p L1 n
Ia 1
cD 2 4 M 0
o) (- -- 09 --- 44 45 I
47 48 49 }'
r
5 42 (n
_ 51 53
SE 2ND ST CD,
54 0;.
-o .
_____7_3 72 71 11111E1
63 62 60 J
56 55 ;
LA 0.03 L, i
TR 997 N88:01'33"W •_
823.45 •
150.13
R=25.00
L�=38.5717" La Lo
-..1,
N00'28'39"E N8T08'22"W �J
249.83 0
5.28 0l
z oI
rn
N88`00'19'W•
—__.-- I
1307.43
S.E. 2ND PL. - - - - - - - _ J%
LINE BEARING DISTANCE j
L1 N88'02'01"W 152.00_
L2 N00129'11"E 127 71
L3 N88'04'08"W 152.00 FOUND 1-1/2" BRASS CAP
CO
W/PUNCH
NOW
N00'29'11"E 59 /� fJCH IN CONIC- DN. 1.2' INL5_ N88'03'20"W 150.00 CASE (CITY OF RENTON NO.
L6 - N00129'09"E 12 7 45 2105) HELD FOR CTR. SEC
28
CITY OF RENTON COUNCIL AGENDA BILL
t,, Submitting Data: Planning/Building/Public Works For Agenda of: June 4, 2007
Dept/Div/Board.. Development Services Division
Staff Contact Mike Dotson X-7304 Agenda Status
Consent X
Subject: Public Hearing..
Shy Creek Final Plat. Correspondence.. Ordinance
File Number: LUA 07-002 FP (Preliminary Plat LUA Resolution X
06-009). Old Business
Exhibits: New Business
1. Resolution and legal description. Study Sessions
2. Staff Report and Recommendation. Information
Recommended Action: Approvals:
Council Concur Legal Dept X
Finance Dept
Other
Fiscal Impact: N/A
Expenditure Required... Transfer/Amendment
Amount Budgeted Revenue Generated
Total Project Budget City Share Total Project..
SUMMARY OF ACTION:
The recommendation for approval of the referenced final plat is submitted for Council action.
This final plat subdivides 61 single-family residential lots with sanitary sewer, storm drainage,
street lighting, curb and gutter, sidewalks and street improvements. Design and construction of
utilities, lighting and pavement will be approved, accepted or deferred (and a security device
posted) as required through Planning/Building/Public Works prior to recording the plat. All
conditions placed on the preliminary plat by the City of Renton will be met prior to recording the
plat.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
Approve the Shy Creek Final Plat, LUA 07-002 with the following conditions and adopt the
resolution:
1. All plat fees shall be paid prior to recording the plat.
2. All plat improvements shall be either constructed or deferred to the satisfaction of City staff
prior to recording the plat.
4161.9
C:\Documents and Settings\User\Desktop\Shy Creek AGNBHPII2.doc/
CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON
RESOLUTION NO.
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON,
APPROVING FINAL PLAT(SHY CREEK, FILE NO. LUA-07-002FP).
WHEREAS, a petition for the approval of a final plat for the subdivision of a certain tract
of land as hereinafter more particularly described, located within the City of Renton, has been duly
approved by the Planning/Building/Public Works Department; and
WHEREAS, after investigation, the Administrator of the Planning/Building/Public Works
Department has considered and recommended the approval of the final plat, and the approval is
proper and advisable and in the public interest; and
WHEREAS,the City Council has determine that appropriate provisions are made for the
public health, safety, and general welfare and for such open spaces, drainage ways, streets or
Now
roads, alleys, other public ways, transit stops, potable water supplies, sanitary wastes, parks and
recreation, playgrounds, schools, school grounds, sidewalks and other planning features that
assure safe walking conditions for students who walk to and from school; and
WHEREAS, the City Council has determined that the public use and interest will be
served by the platting of the subdivision and dedication;
NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RENTON,
WASHINGTON, DOES RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS:
SECTION L The above findings are true and correct in all respects.
SECTION H. The final plat is hereby approved pertaining to the following described
real estate, to wit:
See Exhibit it "A" attached hereto and made a part hereof as if fully set forth
1
RESOLUTION NO.
(The property, consisting of approximately 16.4 acres, is located
between Hoquiam Ave. NE and Jericho Ave NE and NE 2nd St. and SE 2nd Pl.)
Such plat is subject to the laws and ordinances of the City of Renton and subject to the findings,
conclusions and recommendation of the Planning/Building/Public Works Department dated
May 22, 2007.
PASSED BY THE CITY COUNCIL this day of , 2007.
Bonnie I. Walton, City Clerk
APPROVED BY THE MAYOR this day of , 2007.
Kathy Keolker, Mayor
Approved as to form:
Lawrence J. Warren, City Attorney
RES.1272:5/25/07:ch
2
EXHIBIT A
Legal Description
PARCEL A:
TRACT 25,BLACK LOAM FIVE ACRE TRACTS,ACCORDING TO THE PLAT THEREOF,RECORDED IN
VOLUME 12 OF PLATS,PAGE 101, IN KING COUNTY,WASHINGTON;
EXCEPT THE FOLLOWING DESCRIBED PARCEL
BEGINNING AT THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF SAID TRACT 25;
THENCE SOUTHERLY ALONG THE WEST UNE OF 144TH AVENUE SOUTHEAST,TO THE
SOUTHEAST CORNER OF SAID TRACT 25;
THENCE WESTERLY ALONG THE SOUTH UNE OF SAID TRACT A DISTANCE OF 207.00 FEET;
THENCE NORTHERLY AND PARALLEL WITH THE WEST LINE OF 144TH AVENUE SOUTHEAST,TO A
POINT LYING 140.00 FEET SOUTH OF THE NORTH UNE OF SAID TRACT 25;
THENCE WESTERLY ALONG A LINE PARALLEL TO THE NORTH LINE OF TRACT 25 A DISTANCE OF
48.00 FEET;
THENCE NORTHERLY AND PARALLEL TO THE WEST UNE OF 144TH AVENUE SOUTHEST,A
DISTANCE OF 140.00 FEET TO THE NORTH UNE OF SAID TRACT 25;
THENCE EASTERLY ALONG SAID NORTH UNE TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING.
(ALSO KNOWN AS A PORTION OF KING COUNTY LOT LINE ADJUSTMENT NUMBER S90M0088,
RECORDED UNDER RECORDING NUMBER 9804090613.)
PARCEL B:
PARCEL C OF KING COUNTY LOT LINE ADJUSTMENT NUMBER S90M0088 AS RECORDED UNDER
RECORDING NUMBER 9804090613, IN KING COUNTY,WASHINGTON;
BEING A PORTION OF TRACT 25,BLACK LOAM FIVE ACRE TRACTS,ACCORDING TO THE PLAT
THEREOF,RECORDED IN VOLUME 12,OF PLATS,PAGE 101,IN KING COUNTY,WASHINGTON.
PARCEL C:
TRACTS 28 AND 29,BLACK LOAM FIVE ACRE TRACTS,ACCORDING TO THE PLAT THEREOF,
RECORDED IN VOLUME 12 OF PLATS,PAGE 101,IN KING COUNTY,WASHINGTON.
PARCEL D:
TRACT 32,BLACK LOAM FIVE ACRE TRACTS,ACCORDING TO THE PLAT THEREOF, RECORDED IN
VOLUME 12 OF PLATS,PAGE 101, IN KING COUNTY,)NASHINGTON.
Near
440
4'-I-
v
-1.9O •i i ' c•cs
MAY VALLE -12,,.,
44124 --I kiOUNTY PARK 2ToNta
<SSIii 9QO.
vSE11TSHE 116TH ST
NI-
L&iii _
�O
W
Lu •
i
0
W
(0
1
Z
NI-
O ST `o
'ccN-1-- �Li
Q,zSE COALf EIL'
o en 124TH �" (PARK
Z A �I zI
,?Q
h `� (v PARKNS
TO / 405 q `n Q uo`) co R de
RIDE
NE 4TH ST iZ ii (44 II '
01
NE 2- ST �]�E^ I PARK mi ,
SE 132ND ST �.
2 4?ttj
SE 133RD CT Ili RENTON o Q• w 0 =
SE 2ND P PARK I i
1
. 3:J%G..x. '' i~/:7;• '44,7Yl.:FGRL0.'",'i.Wy W'`. � - .. ���3 "b�'. ...c..�s/
VICINITY arTY MAP
NOT TO SCALE
DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DIVISION
BUILDING/PLANNING/PUBLIC WORKS
CITY OF RENTON
STAFF REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS
APPLICANT: John Skochdopole
Conner Homes Company
Shy Creek Final Plat.
File: LUA 07-002, FP
LOCATION: Between SE 2" Place and NE 2" Street and
between Jericho and Hoquiam Ave NE
Section 15, Twp. 23 N., Rng 5 E, W.M.
SUMMARY OF REQUEST: Final Plat for 61 single-family residential
lots with water, sanitary sewer, storm, street
and lighting.
RECOMMENDATION: Approve With Conditions
FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS & RECOMMENDATION
Having reviewed the record documents in this matter, staff now makes and enters the
following:
FINDINGS:
1. The applicant, John Skochdople, Conner Homes Company, filed a request for
approval of Shy Creek, a 61-lot Final Plat.
2. The yellow file containing all staff reports, the State Environmental Policy Act
(SEPA) documentation and other pertinent materials was entered into the record
as Exhibit No. 1.
3. The Environmental Review Committee (ERC), the City's responsible official,
issued a Determination on Non-Significance-Mitigated (DMA-M).
4. All appropriate City of Renton personnel reviewed the subject proposal.
5. The subject site is located at Between SE 2" Place and NE 2"J Street and between
Now Jericho and Hoquiam Ave NE . Section 15, Twp. 23 N., Rng 5 E, W.M.
44100
6, The subject site is comprised of a parcel of 16.14 acres.
7. The City of Renton Council approved the Preliminary Plat (LUA-06-009) on
January 27, 2006.
8. The site is zoned R-8 (Single Family— 8 dwelling units/acre).
9. The Final Plat complies with both the Zoning Code and the Comprehensive Plan.
As a condition of Final Plat submittal, the following items address the conditions of plat
approval from the Hearing Examiner's decision approved by the City Council. The
conditions of the Plat Approval and actions taken are summarized below.
The final plat of Shy Creek has been designed to comply with all conditions of
preliminary plat approval granted under City of Renton file no. LUA06-009, PP, ECF.
Conditions of approval are presented below, and our statement of compliance with each is
italicized bold:
Hearing Examiner Conditions:
1. The applicant shall comply with all requirements of the Determination of Non-
significance-- Mitigated that was issued by the Environmental Review Committee
on April 25, 2006.
ERC MITIGATION CONDITIONS COMPLIANCE:
a. The applicant shall comply with the recommendations found in the geotechnical
report prepared by Earth Consultants, Inc. dated February 1, 2005.
The Road, Stormwater and Sewer plans approved by the City on October 31,
2006, contain site preparation, clearing and grading plans that comply with
the recommendations in this report. Note referencing the geotechnical report
is found on Sheet 5 of the Road, Storm water and Sewer Plans.
b. The applicant shall be required to provide a Topography Erosion and
Sedimentation Control Plan (TESCP) designed pursuant to the Department of
Ecology's Erosion and Sediment Control Requirements outlined in Volume II of
the Stormwater Management Manual and provide staff with a Construction
Mitigation Plan prior to issuance of Construction Permits. This condition shall
be subject to the review and approval of the Development Services Division.
Sheets 3, 4 and 7of the Road, Storm water and Sewer plans approved by the
City of Renton on October 31, 2006 contain a TESCP designed pursuant to
Ecology's ESC requirements.
c. The detention system for this project shall be required to comply with the
requirements found in the 2005 King County Surface Water Design Manual.
The detention system is designed to comply with the requirements of the 2005
King County Surface Water Design Manual. Reference the Technical
Information Report by Triad Associates dated March 22, 2006 and the Road,
Storm water and Sewer Plans approved by the City'on October 31, 2006.
d. The applicant shall be required to relocate the proposed 60-foot wide entrance to
the plat to a location where the well and its associated buffer would not be
impacted.
The relocated plat entrance is shown on Sheet 5 of 6 of the Final Plat map.
e. The applicant shall pay a Parks Mitigation Fee based on $530.76 per each new
single family lot.
Parks mitigation fee will be paid prior to Final Plat approval.
f. The proposed project shall comply with the recommendations found in the
Traffic Impact Analysis prepared by Transportation Engineering Northwest
dated January 26, 2006 including the payment of a Traffic Mitigation Fee in the
amount of$75.00 per net new average daily trip.
Payment of mitigation fees is the only recommendation in this report. Impact
fees will be paid prior to Final Plat approval.
g. Staff recommends that the applicant pay a Fire Mitigation Fee based on $488.00
per new single family lot.
Fire mitigation fees will be paid prior to Final Plat approval.
2. Demolition permits shall be obtained and all inspections completed on the
demolition of the existing residences and detached accessory structures prior to final
plat approval.
This condition will be satisfied prior to final plat approval.
3. A revised landscape plan shall be submitted prior to final plat approval to the
Development Service Division project management for review and approval. The
revised landscape plan shall identify a 5-foot planting strip along the street frontage
of the proposed "looped" road in addition to the perimeter roads and shall show two
trees within the front yard areas of all lots within the proposed subdivision.
A revised landscape plan complying with this condition is included in this Final
Plat application for City review.
4. The applicant shall be required to place "No Parking" signage along the 26-foot
wide private access easement prior to final plat approval.
This condition will be satisfied prior to final plat approval.
5. A homeowner's association or maintenance agreement shall be created concurrently
with the recording of the final plat in order to establish maintenance responsibilities
for shared roadway, stormwater and utility improvements. A draft of the
document(s) shall be submitted to the City of Renton Development Services
Division for review and approval by the City Attorney and Property Services section
prior to the recording of the final plat.
A draft of the CCRs and Homeowners Association rules are included in this
Final Plat application for City review.
6. A revised stream mitigation plan incorporating the comments from the Watershed
Co., dated April 27, 2006, shall be submitted at the time of Utility Construction
Pen-nit Application, for review and approval by the Development Services Division
Project Manager.
Reference sheets Wi through 4 submitted with the Road, Storm water and Sewer
Plans approved on October 31, 2006.
7. Mitigation shall be required for the impacts proposed to Wetland B. A detailed
mitigation plan for the impacts proposed to Wetland B shall be submitted at the
time of Utility Construction Permit Application to the Development Services
Division Project Manager for review and approval. 10
Reference sheets WI through 4 submitted with the Road, Storm water and Sewer
Plans approved on October 31, 2006.
8. A bottomless box culvert with footings located outside of the stream channel shall
be the stream crossing method required for the crossing located on the east side of
the project site.
Reference sheets 8 and 9 of the Road, Storm water and Sewer Plans approved by
the City on 10/31/2006.
9. A Native Growth Protection Easement shall be recorded over Tracts B, C and F
prior to or concurrent with the recording of the final plat map.
Reference Notes 4 and 'on page 2 of 6 on the Final Plat map.
10. The edge of the wetland and stream buffers shall be delineated with a split rail fence
and identified with signage as approved by the Development Services Division
Project Manager. A fencing and signage detail shall be submitted to the
Development Services Division project manager at the time of Utility Construction
Permit Application for review and approval. The fencing and signage shall be
installed prior to the recording of the final plat.
Reference Final Landscape plan included in this Final Plat application for City
review.
11. The stormwater detention tract (Tract G) shall be landscaped and irrigated (unless
drought tolerant plants are used) appropriately. In addition, the stormwater
detention tract shall be fenced with a 6-foot solid wood fence. The applicant shall
submit a landscape plan and fencing detail for the review and approval of the
Development Services Project Manager prior to recording of the plat.
Reference Final Landscape Plan included in this Final Plat application for City
review.
CONCLUSIONS:
The Final Plat generally appears to satisfy the conditions imposed by the preliminary plat
process and therefore should be approved by the City Council.
RECOMMENDATION:
1. The City Council to approve the Final Plat with the following conditions:
a) All plat fees shall be paid prior to the recording of the plat.
b) All plat improvements shall be either constructed or deferred to the
satisfaction of City staff prior to the recording of the plat.
40.0
SUBMITTED THIS 22st DAY OF May 2007.
•
MIKE DOTSON
DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DIVISION
cc Kayren Krttricl:
I.t LA-07-00 -I P
Shy Creek
868-21'1.3.w 1 34562. n
070 02
>b.,m 1 / >:,.91.2,007mI
�� ame
8.n 7..fic V 1--.d „0,041,11. 3a
e U Z
a = ¢
S 11, :oa I z,i I ?
O �I ,mw I ,mm r fli°i'vn +
, 2
0
NM91'LCN -, I:
200.42 1.000 •1.09.61 ITVJ ,woo' 40
F , ,1.12-17 IQCS z
,oc°' I- ,, _a
9
>:Sw, R qw . 08 ,www P-
-E
i "8%
rw LIe ,..-4,12,1.'a,1NetretrN 107.00'
`l ,mw
I
,mov I8 »w eaw 50.
-r0 M 410 mM 1
,m58.,n 8 ,mon 8 •, °• •
P. P I »e t4, n5d',R
^ 38 !_ 27.�ro 1- m w
8- 8- me,77 UE 14 'g
" vt Nw
,wm wrwm zol\ ,
wr t Wit—.. —1 tea_ 1*-\'-'x° T IT
�� 57a 8 .8 e w .w zOle7xe rales . Ei, C.
D 'F A .,res IV W _ f
a r® ,x " ,. 4.— 740.41.13, ,9200' b '..20‘e
e \ 7. ••:�,.,.,, �:'it,
• NE 1ST COURT ,; \ax.°e �� ,ni m.
202
- ,\ \ 8
$ ws,�.ly gg ar`< g sl ��i� �I tr � 1 MOW„r. m SCALE:1"= 60'
52
� • U � am"� 120
W ® m r. i
i - _ a b1R ^_$ I 1 GI a ,m34 a � o ao sa
,merne m 1. ,w ao J e�..,28 �- 7575 p„ 7s a I g z ,L1_,°.• Z. a
o
, l aar 1°ar�" a I 109.
moa ,mo q $ °0 ro CO.
a5.m raw I a ,�9 '�„''”;w
< " = xm.,,r0 MS 00. �- mobA >oo is R BASIS OF BEARING
--1-.. _a a-
O ,o0' 91
I ..°o°o•TR CT 0 NAD OF A
= y" , a-xxSPo U
CITY OF HENTUN MONUMENTS
woe
—a tij C 0.0.41851(HOLE POINT)AND
mm mm e x1:>n ti I +.),
"' 1 v ' 7 OC 0F S 1852 HOLDING A BEARING
g 0 WI Oo OF S8BR#10"E FROM C0R#1851
\..:c_/ ,"' „ TO CCR#1852
e,° ,J In b a www .92,92 0000 a s
nI ,`�'F_-/ _ -_I-_ _ °'S0 O.' 1 ? 921'.''NE 1ST STREET'
--75 00— I 79200 a9� 2.0 _ _-
8 715 n i 7 , TR s� .j it i/\ •®t:Sn',,.,G�'
4103,
7.7 NE 00157 STREET ae m ITV"
-',,.---70,;•'-$. '+' ✓a r ps>> '6l1
ic.v-urea ,vzz'c P E,„
W (o-xs°v°, ®I TRASCT.n 8 a¢�_——� L'-' - '. U nes/5 ,,F: 5,2 1r .0
°J u� of i>'Y �";.7-n TRAC..,D \ 1'' E 4 o-sbi ' ''' 4 ammran�J
i ,. _" ,.I,: _✓ ,7ara No "U7,ss ®sem. s�.r��.ss�Rx�
y. g U S ��c�x"5 '0
It® i a' MORSEEFITE
14 95 mw ,500 °.� m�; Ixla °a"� I w nE 811M12
• m (� IIIMSDIMEAMMINIEfi
101RACT G / ^Wi 1 .monrt �,.x1„n '6)---I n n 7.n�t�a 30
mb"DA2 =a I
p I I
R w :., I $< I 1 v" I u
/ a I o I WO 0, 7011 I a
//
,.ns.5gn 18 s I m1 1 iia wm 7_zis e A PUB C U TY EASEMENT
L. x00 g--Low
,mann $ 9218 a n 0,- ,°w K
4 // N ^I'o I xer ,z 08 PRIVATE STORM DRAIN EASEMENT/ x71 w °" ,� o- ,,,.,,
o ITT 81 m ,o^x a _ '!.'271:''i ©PRIVATE WATER ONE EASEMENT
. x 51 res w Ig 'w w ® " J¢ g I 1�a�LANDSCAPE EASEMENT
^fl 8 1 e n I 1 o- -8 7s` n ®PPIVATE ACCESS EASEMEN-
H-18. R s--(6) , oron 8 ,T7;„n g
8� 7x00 x, r ”_® n " m L gl „5.e1
1 CO
S 2 2. .4n k lwar £ 701 20 8 ',....'1'
8 7z7„a=
I
xm „> \ rt 5 ,,..16..„ I^/ : „5
1 se 'MtbS \i WO' nes' 1.�sszJ W „ 1
8 X
is 8 ". al
7.z+vn 2
SSs \ - SE 2ND STREET 2a4m --I 4.V.,,,,,,,, "7,1'r I z
? I \ L • ,...1-4,'''
.. IasoC m \ 1113 $� 71,6 0 a
92 1-,III sv�v"c°o a°°--r��n " 'n ,0.0.) 1 ..1 n 115 1.6. 0
6 �® bin $ 1 4e•b°° 1 .98183, U
.00-4D
j v,M/,11.. 7920,I- K S
I g[® $
F xv�r. n 1 zz7m',mov n a§ zr 2 1.zw 'x, 'n e
?e I
g" s / 925 s"I m4< ® I °sem I ,m..,,r °„5
_ '" I
0' i
•
L .„7,,, k
1 I mc., N me w 94 v
409.M,A . ro „n a n ? na n z
10
20 04 n1 $ �D � I
8�75,1«,Y,=A I ® ,oma.,-am
1I ▪'p-na. wuo ¢ ,b - f60=L:__ t'-; -m' Il
nq.
�I _ ,9205 — "m '°or I. -
CITY OF RENTON COUNCIL AGENDA BILL
Al#:
411100, Submitting Data: Community Services For Agenda of: June 4, 2007
Dept/Div/Board.. Parks
Staff Contact Leslie Betlach, x-6619 Agenda Status
_ Consent X
Subject: Public Hearing..
Heritage Park Project Funding Correspondence..
Ordinance
Resolution
Old Business
Exhibits: New Business
Issue Paper Study Sessions
Information
Recommended Action: Approvals:
Council Concur Legal Dept
Finance Dept
Other
Fiscal Impact:
Expenditure Required... $35,000 Transfer/Amendment
,....i Amount Budgeted $1,432,000 Revenue Generated
Total Project Budget $1,467,000 City Share Total Project
SUMMARY OF ACTION:
The Heritage Park project budget is $1,432,000 for design,permitting, surveying, artwork,
advertising, and construction. The original construction contract amount for Heritage Park was
$994,990.14 and was awarded to Ohno Construction. To date, six change orders have been
awarded totaling$79,058.43 increasing, the construction contract amount to $1,074,048.57, with
$27,448.79 remaining in the project budget. These change orders included additional security
fencing, hazard tree removal, flood control measures, and garbage removal.
Two additional change orders (change orders 7 and 8)totaling up to $48,825.17 for electrical
installation/connections, hog fuel removal, topsoil importation and hydroseeding would complete
the project for the project opening on June 16, 2007. A project later this year to install a wood
guardrail safety barrier along Union Avenue with an estimated cost of$13,000 is also
recommended. The increase in costs total $61,825.17 creating a project shortfall of$34,376.38.
The completed Coulon Park Structural Repair project had a cost savings of$117,789.02 in the
same 316 Fund, a portion of which ($35,000) could be utilized to complete the Heritage Park
Project.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
Authorize use of project savings (line item 316.000000.020.5940.0076.63.000001) in an amount
up to $35,000 from the completed CIP Major Maintenance/Parks Maintenance Project, Coulon
Park Structural Repairs, to complete work identified in Heritage Park Construction Project
Change Orders 7 and 8 and the future wood guardrail safety barrier installation along Union
Avenue.
Rentonnet/agnbill/ bh
tY
Uti,; ® - COMMUNITY SERVICES DEPARTMENT
NiaireTe Nryc MEMORANDUM
DATE: May 24, 2007
TO: Toni Nelson, Council President
Members of the Renton City Council
VIA: _3-) Kathy Keolker, M or
FROM: - Terry Higashiyama, ommunity Services Administrator
STAFF CONTACT: Leslie Betlach, Parks Director X6619
SUBJECT: Heritage Park Project Funding
ISSUE:
Should the City Council authorize utilizing $35,000 in project savings from one
completed project in the 316 fund to fund change orders and a future safety guardrail
installation in another 316 fund project (the Heritage Park Project)?
RECOMMENDATION;
Authorize use of project savings (line item 316.000000.020.5940.0076.63.000001 ) in an
amount up to $35,000 from the completed CIP Major Maintenance/Parks Maintenance
project, Coulon Park Structural Repairs, to complete work identified in the Heritage Park
project (line item 316.000000.020.5940.0076.62.020051).
BACKGROUND
Heritage Park was budgeted $1,432,000 for design, permitting, surveying, artwork,
advertising, and construction. The original construction contract amount for Heritage
Park was $994,990.14 and was awarded to Ohno Construction. To date, six change
orders have been awarded totaling $79,058.43 increasing the construction contract
amount to $1,074,048.57. These change orders included additional security fencing,
hazardous tree removal, flood control measures, and garbage removal and an
informational kiosk which will contain infointation celebrating the history of the area.
The current Project Budget has $27,448.79 remaining.
Two additional change orders (change orders 7 and 8) totaling up to $48,825.17 for
electrical installation/connections, hog fuel removal, topsoil importation, and hydro
seeding would complete the project for the project opening on June 16, 2007. A
project later this year to install a wood guardrail safety barrier along Union Avenue
err with an estimated cost of$13,000 is also recommended.
h:\leslie\heritage park co7&8 councflmemo.doc
Heritage Park Funding
Page 2 of 2
May 24,2007
The increase in costs total $61,825.17 creating a project shortfall of$34,376.38.
The completed Coulon Park Structural Repair Project had a cost savings of
$117,789.02 in the same 316 Fund,a portion of which ($35,000) could be utilized
to complete the Heritage Park Project.
CONCLUSION
The Community Services Department recommends the City Council authorize the
use of project cost savings from the Coulon Park Structural Repairs Project (Fund
316) to fund work identified in Change Orders 7 and 8 and the future wood
guardrail safety barrier in Heritage Park (Fund 316).
viud
Cc: Jay Covington, Chief Administrative Officer
Mike Bailey, Finance Administrator
Bill Rasmussen, CIP Coordinator
h:\leslie\heritage park co7&8 councilmemo.doc
CITY OF RENTON COUNCIL AGENDA BILL
Submitting Data: Planning/Building/Public Works For Agenda of: June 4, 2007
Dept/Div/Board.. Development Services Division
Staff Contact Carrie K. Olson x7235 Agenda Status
Consent X
Subject: Public Hearing..
Acceptance of additional right-of-way to comply with Correspondence.. Ordinance
City of Renton code for new short plats and the Resolution
Collier Short Plat (LUA06-140). Old Business
Exhibits: New Business
Deed of Dedication Study Sessions
Exhibit Map
Vicinity Map Information
Administrative Report and Decision
Recommended Action: Approvals:
Council concur Legal Dept X
Finance Dept X
Other
Fiscal Impact: N/A
Expenditure Required... Transfer/Amendment
Amount Budgeted Revenue Generated
Total Project Budget City Share Total Project.
SUMMARY OF ACTION:
The area to be dedicated is a strip of land 2' X 160.84', approximately 321 sq.ft, along the East side
of the Collier Short Plat and Lind Avenue SW. This dedication is to comply with City of Renton
code for new short plats and the Collier Short Plat (LUA06-140). Council acceptance of said right-
of-way should be completed prior to recording the deed with the short plat.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
Accept the additional right-of-way and authorize the Mayor and City Clerk to sign and record the Deed
of Dedication.
•
C:\DOCUME-1\MNeumann\LOCALS—I\Temp\Collier SHPL 03m AGNBILL.doc
Return Address:
City Clerk's Office
City of Renton
1055 South Grady Way
Renton, WA 98055
DEED OF DEDICATION Property Tax Parcel Number: 23O 72 l
Project File#: LUA-06-140 5bi-t?L Street Intersection: Lind Ave SW& SW Langston Rd
Reference Number(s)of Documents assigned or released Additional reference numbers are on page
Grantor(s): Grantee(s):
1. Dale F. Collier 1. City of Renton,a Municipal Corporation
LEGAL DESCRIPTION: A PORTION OF THE NE QUARTER OF THE SW QIIARI ER OF SECT ION
18, TOWNSHIP 23 NORTH. RANGE 5 EAST OF THE WILLAMETTE
MERIDIAN, CITY OF RENTON, KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON. DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS.
THE EAST 2 FEET OF LOT 1 OF CITY OF RLNTON LOT LINE ADJUS I'MI/N f LI iA-05-lag-LI.A
RECORDED UNDER AUDITOR'S FILE No. 20060427900009
The Grantor, for and in consideration of mutual benefits conveys,quit claims,dedicates and donates to the Grantees)as
named above,the above described real estate situated in the County of King, State of Washington.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and seal the day and year as written below.
Approved and Accepted By:
Grantor(s): Grantee(s): City of Renton
Dale F. Collier Mayor
City Clerk
INDr1YDU.-IL FORM or STATE OF WASHINGTON ) SS
ACKNOWLEDGMENT COUNTY OF KING
I certify that I know or have satisfactory evidence that
Notary Seal must he within box
signed this instrument and
acknowledged it to be his/her/their free and voluntary act for the uses and purpose,
mentioned in the instrument.
Notary Public in and for the State of Washington
Notary (Print) _
My appointment expires:
Dated:
'1w
tits,rms/.xxxFRM/AGRFE;2005205DeedofDedication.doc' LAS Page I IutRNI0tPOO i hh
Project: LUA-06-140-SHPL 4.111110
Exhibit A WO#
PID: 182305 9269
Legal Description GRANTOR: Dale F. Collier
Street: Lind Avenue SW
A PORTION OF THE NE QUARTER OF THE SW QUARTER OF SECTION
18, TOWNSHIP 23 NORTH, RANGE 5 EAST OF THE WILLAMETTE
MERIDIAN, CITY OF RENTON, KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON. DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS:
THE EAST 2 FEET OF LOT 1 OF CITY OF RENTON LOT LINE ADJUSTMENT LUA-05-142-LLA
RECORDED UNDER AUDITOR'S FILE No. 20060427900009
17C)
/
;-
j.
at
10:241
,p ;
EXPIRES.:a:1!, , J
Hfort„S xxxFRM;AGREE/2005205DeedotDedication.doc!LAS Page 2 FORM 04 n:OF i hh
'41✓
Map Exhibit
589'02'25T 64.00' ' 41/il\
fl t
NI - F 30'
i . 52975gFt 1 ':' i�
1 N
W
rFq 939'02'25'E 43A5'
W ,P 'r t,J,
g C14
•
*ows89ro2't3E 4032' "I v
J
a r �J
iiia,,,,S�hm,,,,,✓/n,nlln.`" 1 Z
„,„„ 46.3' r 108' Yd
IEs 1
43 z
2 a I `
J ifi
7070 Sq Ft I-
y„ t
J
Paved driveway f
wftti extruded curb I I -iI
1
Ibr/
ccyp�rE sI �4.50.0,.,, *it I i II
572
S
Now ''z'o,67 - f
�1 Encased Concrete
Min with Pin
PLEASE TYPE OR PRINT REAL ESTATE EXCISE TAX AFFIDAVIT This form is your receipt
CHAPTER 82.45 RCW—CHAPTER 458-61 WAC when stamped by cashier.
Foe USE AT COUNTY TREASURER'S OFFICE
(Use Form No.84-0001 B for Reporting Transfers of Controlling Interest of Entity Ownership to the Department of Revenue)
THIS AFFIDAVIT WILLLNOT BE ACCEPTED UNLESS ALL AREAS 1-')ARE FULLY COMPLETED
4110
e Name Dale F, Lb ICII)1 in Name City of Renton,a Municipal Corporation
F.O
wy 3Q4 'juJ L�>T1c�af' -it. Q� 1055 South Grady Way
Street
¢ Street
{^ Cep 1j °'c Renton WA 98057
City/State/Zip L\Q'Yl d11 City/State/21p
© ADDRESS TO SEND ALL PROPERTY TAX RELATED CORRESPONDENCE ALL TAX PARCEL NUMBERS COUNTY TREASURER PLACE
ASSESSED VALUE IF TAX EXEMPT
Name Portion of tax parcel#(S):
Street (Same as Grantor information) 192505 910
City/State/Zip
© LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF PROPERTY SITUATED IN ❑UNINCORPORATED�C COUNTY'11 OR IN CITY OF Renton
Street Address(if property is improved): 309- .54,.54,-31� .. / /sk--). Rd - R-0,-,1ark
Portion of A/E/�' i /4_ /8 13—S
L a L / e�fy ® ' 1?-e -r LLA LOA-05142-a')
At rN 2a® a4-27 goer-'07
In the City of Renton,King County,Washington.
®Is this property currently: YES NO i Description of personal property included in gross selling price,both
tangible(eg;furniture,equipment,etc.)or intangible(cg;goodwill,
Classified or designated as forest land? II [I agreement not to compete,etc.)
Chapter 84.33 RCW
Classified as current use land(open space,farm 0 40
and agricultural,or timber)?Chapter 84.34 RCW
Exempt from property tax as a nonprofit 5:3 [•] If exemption claimed,list WAC number and explanation.
organization?Chapter 84.36 RCW W AC No.(Sec/Sub) 458-61 A-205
Seller's Exempt Reg.No.
Receiving special valuation as historic 0 M Explanation Transfer to government for a public purpose.
property?Chapter 84.26 RCW
Property Type: '...li land only 0 land with new building Deed of Dedication
land with previously used building 0 land with mobile home Type of Document .
p timber only 0 building only -
Date of Document
Principal Use: 0 Apt.(4+unit) ❑residential
0 timber 0 agricultural 0 commerciaVindustrial Gross Selling Price $ 0.00
❑other Personal Property(deduct)$
© (1)NOTICE OF CONTINUANCE(RCW 84.33 OR RCW 84.34) Taxable Selling Price$
If the new owner(s)of land that is classified or designated as current use Excise Tax: State$
or forest land wish to continue the clarification or designation of such Local $
land,the new owner(s)must sign below.If the new owner(s)do not desire Delinquent Interest: State$
to continue such classification or designation,all compensating or Local $
additional tax calculated pursuant to RCW 84.33.120 and 140 or RCW
84.34.108 shall be due and payable by the seller or transferor at the time Delinquent Penalty $
of sale.The county assessor must determine if the land transferred Total Due$ 0.00
qualifies to continue classification or designation and must so indicate
below.Signatures do not necessarily mean the land will remain in A MINIMUM OF$2.00 IS DUE AS A PROCESSING FEE AND TAX.
classification or designation.If it no longer qualifies,it will be removed © AFFIDAVIT
and the compensating taxes will be applied.All new owners must sign.
I Certify Under Penalty of Perjury Under The Laws of The State of
ThiS land 0 does 0 does not qualify for continuance. Washington That The Fore 'ng Is True And Correct. .; back of this
form).
Date / f
DEPUTY ASSESSOR Signature of V
Grantor/Agent
(2) NOTICE OF COMPLIANCE(Chapter 84.26 RCW)
If the new owner(s)of property with special valuation as historic property Name(print) DALE F_ T,I,1 FR
wish to continue this special valuation the new owner(s)must sign below. Date and Place of Signing: RENT O N, W A .
If the new owner(s)do not desire to continue such special valuation,all
additional tax calculated pursuant to Chapter 84.26 RCW;shall be due
Signature of
o
and payable by the seller or transferor at the time of sale.
Grantee/Agent
(3) OWNER(S)SIGNATURE
Name(print) Kathy Keolker, Mayor
Date&Place of Signing: Renton,WA
Perjury:Perjury is a class C felony which is punishable by imprisonment in the state correctional institution for a maximum term of not more
than five years,or by a fine in an amount fixed by the court of not more than five thousand dollars($5,000.00),or by both imprisonment and
fine(RCW 9A.20.020(1C)).
REV 84 0001a(3.18-99)(PD 4-05-00) FOR TREASURER'S USE ONLY [)COUNTY TREASURER
[)DEPT.OF REVENUE
()COUNTY ASSESSOR
[)TAXPAYER *110
E3 - 7 T23N R5E W 1/2
_ ,n R-8
___._____i ; _ NW 4th i z RM-F
R-R 1
f-_ ,— iy a' CA
y
rwr I R-g rd P P .
Qs 41
� R-8_______, ,, '�/' v � �
R-4 !R-, CA
co,
(2.„
..„. ,,.
.o .
. t„ o
¢,' ,7-7 R-8 E--5
I
.¢' co C A
R-8 R cY
e. �-- __
2.,N ,S 132 s' t: . 1 2nd St
..E,' .1F,, C A CA
4 CA S - 1
( voll Ave' :,-,--:,._i_, -10
Re e�i.SW Vit
� R
ii
c 01.1,; .tom. cn CA
Q)
; S ay- = � R-10 o71 a-
�N Ii'w
end w` ,w t__ h L----S coW - .a8 -"----;,`:-----
; CA °°
R- � ►►- _ L CA - , 1-1
Nw
,, R--8 � n,8 on p . „i.1 z
FR` Son,.
,
71
qii R-8(P). r
t�p, M 4! . R-10. ,�
rgi
w SW �s. S 3r N
8 3rd`p CA •�� ` A
1ti, e CAS- ,3
40RT» �o $�1�5 C.
__ ,„,,,,,,,oe
2,__.......__
,,,, ,..
. .
-F
sk th ct RM-F w- s 4
RM-� CA
--_- -c„0_,,,, --___,O..,.. ..1. -F .,,
RM-F
itIMS'
- IMt. IM " CA CA CA --
C
:M IM 1 I IM 1 IM CAI CA
x-- •
G3 - 19 T23N R5E W 1/2
It)), Zo 4UF3
ZONING ---- Renton City Limite pp
* P/B/PW TECHNICAL SERVICES
Fro 06/� 18 T23N R5E W 1/2
5318
41111111111/
REPORT City of Renton
Department of Planning/Building/Public Works 1
DECISION ADMINISTRATIVE SHORT PLAT REPORT & DECISION
A. SUMMARY AND PURPOSE OF REQUEST:
REPORT DATE: January 17, 2007
Project Name Collier Short Plat & Variance
Applicants/Owners: Dale Collier
308 SW Langston Road
Renton, WA 98055
Contact: David Thorstad
David Thorstad Architect
406 S 289th Street
. Federal Way, WA 98003
File Number LUA-06-140, SHPL-A, V-A Project Manager Jill K. Ding, Senior Planner
Project Description The applicant is requesting Administrative Short Plat and Variance approval for the
subdivision of an existing 12,687 square foot parcel into two lots. The project site is
located within the Residential - 8 (R-8) dwelling unit per acre zone. An existing residence
is proposed to remain on Lot 2. Proposed Lot 1 would be 5,002 square feet in area, and
Lot 2 would be 6,564 square feet in area. A Variance from the minimum 15-foot front yard *NO
setback has been requested to allow for the retention of the existing residence, which
would have a 6-foot front yard setback from Lind Avenue SW. Access to Lot 1 would be
provided via a single family driveway off of Lind Avenue SW. Access to Lot 2 would
remain off of the existing driveways onto SW Langston Road and Lind Avenue SW.
Project Location 308 SW Langston Road
i-„, .."':' q '''.),R4V'
SITE t' v. z
' a ..
E '. mow?
'. 4y iex' "'� `;. M '' 'bra ah ,.3'•
3 ''• 4. � 5 jia.z 'terve...
E t
'-'!:';';i:k :441:Iiq?''',..fiZ22..:2;:'5':i
-"‘'4..-4_,:"V. ,_ / ' ;4,:<
'� ... ,.
aia
• „ y ,t
„444. r-- 415
C /
z
_
4' m7 tti/ mss:
.4i L..i.- .7C-T.' .f1•:,:',', ;:1,41.0 4 #,Ifir' .-#.-7!.": „it..- '
1 .,,,4
`�
fiNgr` T
. s ' r, s ' s _.-0,T ' *.-1, t g, i,010-,,,,„:„,,;.„„1
..
..„..,:,,, .,
. ,,„..„,,.:, ,, -.,,,,,,,,,..„,,, :_,„„.
.,_ .,_. r ..-,
- „.e, -ff, .„,t-k :.4.,-,
Project Location Map LUA06-140shpI&2.arrpt doc
City of Renton P/B/PW Department Administrative Land Use Action
REPORT AND DECISION DATED January 16,2007;PROJECT LUA-06-140,SHPL-A,V-A Page 2
B. GENERAL INFORMATION:
'err
1.Owners of Record: Dale Collier
308 SW Langston Road
Renton, WA 98055
2.Zoning Designation: Residential—8 du/ac(R-8)
3.Comprehensive Plan Land Use Designation: Residential Single Family(RSF)
4.Existing Site Use: The site is currently developed with an existing single family residence
proposed to remain on new Lot 2.
5.Neighborhood Characteristics:
North: Single Family Residential (R-8 zone)
East: Single Family Residential (R-8 zone)
South: Single Family Residential (R-8 zone)
West: Single Family Residential (R-8 zone)
6.Access: Access to the proposed Lot 1 would be provided via a single family residential driveway onto
Lind Avenue SW. Access to proposed Lot 2 would be provided via existing residential
driveways onto both SW Langston Road and Lind Avenue SW.
7.Site Area: 12,687 square feet/0.29 acre
C. HISTORICAUBACKGROUND:
Action Land Use File No. Ordinance No. Date
Comprehensive Plan N/A 5099 11/01/2004
Zoning N/A 5100 11/01/2004
Now Annexation N/A 1320 7/06/1948
D. PUBLIC SERVICES:
1. Utilities
Water: The site is currently supplied and connected to the City of Renton water system. There is an
8-inch water main in Langston Avenue SW. The project site is located in the 270-water
pressure zone. The site is outside the Aquifer Protection Area.
Sewer: There is an existing 8-inch sewer main in Langston Avenue SW. There is also a 6-inch sewer
main in Lind Avenue SW.
Surface water: There are storm drainage conveyance facilities in this area.
2. Streets: There is currently a paved public right-of-way adjacent to this site. However, there
are no curbs, gutters, or sidewalks along the Lind Avenue SW street frontage.
3. Fire Protection: City of Renton Fire Department
E. APPLICABLE SECTIONS OF THE RENTON MUNICIPAL CODE:
1. Chapter 2 Land Use Districts
Section 4-2-020: Purpose and Intent of Zoning Districts
Section 4-2-070: Zoning Use Table
Section 4-2-110: Residential Development Standards
2. Chapter 4 Property Development Standards
Section 4-4-030: Development Guidelines and Regulations
3. Chapter 6 Streets and Utility Standards
Section 4-6-060: Street Standards
shpltrpt.doc
City of Renton P/B/PW Department Administrative Land Use Action
REPORT AND DECISION DATED January 16,2007; PROJECT LUA-06-140,SHPL-A,V-A Page 3
4. Chapter 7 Subdivision Regulations
Section 4-7-070: Detailed Procedures for Short Subdivisions *41104
Section 4-7-120: Compatibility with Existing Land Use and Plan-General Requirements and
Minimum Standards
Section 4-7-150: Streets-General Requirements and Minimum Standards
Section 4-7-170: Residential Lots-General Requirements and Minimum Standards
5. Chapter 9 Procedures and Review Criteria
F. APPLICABLE SECTIONS OF THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN:
1. Land Use Element— Residential Single Family
2. Community Design Element
G. DEPARTMENT ANALYSIS:
1. Project Description/Background
The applicant, Dale Collier, has proposed to subdivide a 0.29-acre parcel into two lots. The property is
currently developed with an existing single family residential structure, which is proposed to remain on
proposed Lot 2. Lot 1 is intended for the eventual development of a detached single family home.
The lots are proposed at the following sizes: 5,002 square feet (Lot 1), and 6,564 square feet (Lot 2). The
applicant is proposing to access proposed Lot 1 via a residential driveway off of Lind Avenue SW and Lot 2 off
of existing driveways onto SW Langston Road and Lind Avenue SW. The net site area is 11,566 square feet
or 0.27 acres. This in turn, equates to a net density of 7.4 dwelling units per acre (2 /0.27 = 7.4 du/ac), which
is below the maximum (8.0 du/ac) allowed within the R-8 zone.
The topography of the subject site slopes from north to south at an approximate grade of 17 percent. Th
subject site is predominately vegetated with grass lawn, ornamental vegetation, and 8 trees (2 Maple, 2 Pine, 1
Juniper, 1 Walnut, 1 apple, and 1 Holly). None of the trees are proposed to be removed. No critical areas
were found at the subject site during the review of this application.
The applicants have also requested an administrative setback variance for the front yard for the existing single
family residence. The variance is necessary as the existing single family residence cannot maintain the
required 15-foot front yard setback from the edge of the sidewalk easement. The applicant proposes to reduce
the 15-foot front yard setback to a minimum of 6 feet. Approval of an Administrative Setback Variance to
reduce the front yard setback is required in order to approve the proposed two-lot short plat with the retention
of the existing single family residence.
2. Environmental Review
Except when located on lands covered by water or critical areas, short plats are exempt from SEPA
Environmental Review pursuant to WAC 197-11-800(6)(a).
3. Compliance with ERC Conditions
N/A
4. Staff Review Comments
Representatives from various city departments have reviewed the application materials to identify and address
issues raised by the proposed development. These comments are contained in the official file, and the
essence of the comments has been incorporated into the appropriate sections of this report and the
Departmental Recommendation at the end of the report.
5. Consistency Short Plat Criteria
Approval of a plat is based upon several factors. The following short plat criteria have been established t''
assist decision-makers in the review of the plat:
shpltrpt.doc
City of Renton P/B/PW Department Administrative Land Use Action
REPORT AND DECISION DATED January 16,2007; PROJECT LUA-06-140,SHPL-A,V-A Page 4
a) Compliance with the Comprehensive Plan Designation
400.0i The site is designated Residential Single Family (RSF) on the Comprehensive Plan Land Use
Map. Lands in the RSF designation are intended to be used for quality residential detached
development organized into neighborhoods at urban densities. It is intended that larger
subdivision, infill development, and rehabilitation of existing housing be carefully designed to
enhance and improve the quality of single-family living environments. The proposal is consistent
with the following Comprehensive Plan Land Use and Community Design Element policies:
Policy LU-147. Net development densities should fall within a range of 4.0 to 8.0 dwelling units
per acre in Residential Single Family neighborhoods.
The proposed project for two lots would arrive at a net density of 7.4 dwelling units per net acre,
which is within the density range required.
Policy LU-148. A minimum lot size of 5,000 square feet should be allowed on in-fill parcels of less
than one acre (43,560 sq. ft.) in single-family designations. Allow a reduction on lot size to 4,500
square feet on parcels greater than one acre to create an incentive for aggregation of land. The
minimum lot size is not intended to set the standard for density in the designation, but to provide
flexibility in subdivision/plat design and facilitate development within the allowed density range.
All of the proposed lots equal or exceed the minimum lot size of 5,000 square feet.
Policy LU-152. Single-family lot size, lot width, setbacks, and impervious surface should be
sufficient to allow private open space, landscaping to provide buffers/privacy without extensive
fencing, and sufficient area for maintenance activities.
The proposed new lot would meet the required lot size, width, and setbacks to create sufficient
front, rear, and side yard areas. The existing single family residence would not comply with the
required side yard along a street setback from the proposed access easement. An Administrative
Setback Variance has been requested to allow for a reduced setback for the existing residence.
*w'° Policy LU-154. Interpret development standards to support new plats and infill project designs
incorporating street locations, lot configurations, and building envelopes that address privacy and
quality of life for existing residents.
The proposed lots are rectangular in shape and oriented such that all of the lots would have
access to a public right-of-way. Approval of this application would not decrease the quality of life
for residents in the immediate vicinity.
Policy CD-12. Infill development, defined as new short plats of nine or fewer lots, should be
encouraged in order to add variety, updated housing stock, and new vitality to neighborhoods.
The proposed short plat would subdivide one existing parcel into two lots. One new residence
would be constructed on the new lot, updating the housing stock in the existing neighborhood.
b) Compliance with the Underlying Zoning Designation
The subject site is designated Residential — 8 Dwelling Units per Acre (R-8) on the City of Renton
Zoning Map. The proposed development would allow for the future construction of one new single
family dwelling unit on proposed Lot 1. An existing residence would remain on proposed Lot 2.
The allowed density range in the R-8 zone is a minimum of 4.0 to a maximum of 8.0 dwelling units
per acre. Net density is calculated after the deduction of sensitive areas, areas intended for public
right-of-way, and private access easements (vehicular or pedestrian). After the deduction of the
320 square foot right-of-way dedication and the 801 square foot pedestrian access easement, the
proposal would arrive at a net density of 7.4 dwelling units per acre (12,687 square feet— 1,121.15
square feet = 11,565.85 net square feet / 43,560 = 0.27 acres, 2 lots / 0.27 acres = 7.4 du/ac) ,
which is within the density range permitted for the R-8 zone.
The allowed building lot coverage in the R-8 zone is 35 percent or 2,500 square feet, whichever is
greater for lots over 5,000 square feet in size and lots 5,000 square feet or less are allowed a
111100
' maximum of 50 percent lot coverage. The existing residence would result in a lot coverage of 22
percent, which complies with the building lot coverage requirements. The lot coverage
requirements for proposed Lot 1 would be verified at the time of building permit review.
shpltrpt.doc
City of Renton P/B/PW Department Administrative Land Use Action
REPORT AND DECISION DATED January 16,2007; PROJECT LUA-06-140,SHPL-A,V-A Page 5
The required setbacks in the R-8 zone are as follows: front yard is 15 feet for the primary struct,
and 20 feet for an attached garage, side yard is 5 feet, side yard along a street is 15 feet for tlr
primary structure and 20 feet for an attached garage and the rear yard is 20 feet. Based on the
proposed subdivision, the proposed lots would have their front yards facing to the east towards
Lind Avenue SW. The existing residence on proposed Lot 2 would comply with the side, side yard
along a street, and rear setback requirements; however it would not comply with the front yard
setback requirement from the access easement. An Administrative Setback Variance has been
requested to reduce the front yard setback to a minimum of 6 feet. The setbacks for proposed Lot
1 would be verified at the time of building permit review.
The parking regulations required that detached or semi-attached dwellings provide a minimum of 2
off-street parking spaces. As proposed, each lot would have adequate area to provide two off-
street parking spaces. In addition, the parking regulations require that driveways be located a
minimum of 5 feet from the adjoining property line. Compliance with the parking requirements will
be verified at the time of building permit review.
The R-8 zone permits accessory structures only when associated with a primary structure located
on the same parcel. An existing 2,480 sq. ft single-family residence is proposed to remain on new
Lot 2.
c) Community Assets
The site is vegetated primarily with grass, ornamental vegetation, and a total of 8 trees (2 Maple, 2
Pine, 1 Walnut, 1 Juniper, 1 Holly, and 1 apple). No trees are proposed to be removed. The City's
landscaping regulations require the installation of landscaping within the public right-of-way. The
minimum amount of landscaping required for sites abutting a non-arterial public street (Lind
Avenue SW and SW Langston Road) is 5 feet provided that if there is additional undeveloped
right-of-way in excess of 5 feet, this shall also be landscaped. A determination has been made
that if no additional area is available within the public right-of-way due to required improvements-
the 5-foot landscaped strip may be located within private property abutting the public right-of-waw
The landscaping proposed shall either consist of drought resistant vegetation or shall be irrigated
appropriately. In addition, the applicant will be required to plant two ornamental trees, a minimum
caliper of 1-1/2 inches (deciduous) or 6 — 8 feet in height (conifer), within the 15-foot front yard
setback area for the proposed lots.
A conceptual landscape plan was submitted with the application. The applicant is proposing to
retain 2 existing trees within the front yard area of Lot 1 and 5 trees within the front yard area of Lot
2. The existing landscaping for the existing residence is proposed to be retained along the street
frontages of SW Langston Road and Lind Avenue SW for Lot 2 and a 5-foot landscape strip to be
vegetated with salal, vine maple and snowberry is proposed along the Lind Avenue SW street
frontage of Lot 1. The conceptual landscape plan complies with the City's Landscaping
requirements.
A detailed landscape plan is required to be submitted with the building permit application and the
landscaping is required to be installed prior to building occupancy.
d) Compliance with Subdivision Regulations
Streets: No new public streets would be created as part of the proposed short plat.
SW Langston Road is classified as a collector and Lind Avenue SW Park Avenue N is classified as
a Residential Access Street on the City's Arterial Street Map. There are no curbs, gutters or
sidewalks along the frontage of Lind Avenue SW. The City's adopted street standards require the
dedication of 20 feet of right-of-way and the installation of street improvements, including curb,
gutter, and sidewalk, along the frontage of the short plat, which would result in a right-of-way width
of 50 feet. A Modification was granted January 27, 2006 by Kayren Kittrick, Development
Engineering Supervisor to reduce the required right-of-way dedication down to a minimum of 2 feet
with a 5-foot easement for the installation of a sidewalk, resulting in a right-of-way width of 32 feet.
The modification was approved with one condition: "'No Parking' signs shall be installed at any v
100
location where the pavement width is less than twenty-eight feet(28')". A deferral for the
installation of street improvements may be requested from the Development Services Director.
Concerns have been raised from the surrounding neighborhood regarding whether the proposed
short plat would adversely impact access for Seattle City Light trucks turning onto Lind Avenue SW
shpltrpt.doc
City of Renton P/B/PW Department Administrative Land Use Action
REPORT AND DECISION DATED January 16,2007; PROJECT LUA-06-140,SHPL-A,V-A Page 6
from an existing access easement. The proposed short plat is not anticipated to adversely impact
access for the Seattle City Light trucks to or from their existing easement to Lind Avenue SW. An
additional 2 feet of right-of-way would be dedicated prior to the recording of the short plat, which
would improve access on Lind Avenue SW. In addition, additional paving and other street
improvements may occur prior to recording the short plat, which would further enhance access
onto Lind Avenue SW for emergency access as well as the Seattle City Light trucks.
The proposed short plat is anticipated to generate additional traffic on the City's street system. In
order to mitigate transportation impacts, staff recommends a condition of approval be placed on
the project requiring a Transportation Mitigation Fee based on $75.00 per net new average daily
trip attributed to the project. One new lot (credit given for the existing residence) is expected to
generate approximately 9.57 new average weekday trips. The fee for the proposed short plat is
estimated at $717.75 ($75.00 x 9.57 trips x 1 lots = $717.75) and is payable prior to the recording
of the short plat.
Blocks: No new blocks will be created as part of the proposed short plat.
Lots: The size, shape, orientation, and arrangement of the proposed lots comply with the
requirements of the Subdivision Regulations and the development standards of the R-8 zone.
Each lot is rectangular in shape. The front yard areas of the proposed lots are oriented to the east
towards Lind Avenue SW. Each of the proposed lots provides direct access to a public street (Lind
Avenue SW and/or SW Langston Road).
The minimum lot size in the R-8 zone is 5,000 square feet for parcels that total less than 1 acre in
area. The proposed lot sizes are 5,002 square feet for Lot 1 and 6,564 square feet for Lot 2, which
meet the minimum lot size requirements.
The minimum lot width required in the R-8 zone is 60 feet for corner lots and 50 feet for interior
lots. Proposed Lot 1 is an interior lot and would have a minimum width of 59 feet, Lot 2 would be a
corner lot with a minimum width of 66 feet. The minimum lot depth required in the R-8 zone is 65
feet. Both lots would have a lot depth of 84 feet. The dimensions of the proposed lots meet the
minimum width and depth requirements and are compatible with other existing lots in this area
under the same R-8 zoning classification. In addition, the lots appear to contain adequate building
areas for the construction of a suitable single-family residence when taking setbacks and lot
coverage requirements into consideration. These requirements will be reviewed at the time of
building permit application.
e) Reasonableness of Proposed Boundaries
Access: Each lot would have direct access to a public right-of-way(Lind Avenue SW and/or SW
Langston Road)via single family driveways.
Topography: The topography of the site slopes to the south, at an average slope of approximately
17%. The property is vegetated with grass lawn, ornamental vegetation, and a total of 8 trees (2
Maple, 2 Pine, 1 Walnut, 1 Juniper, 1 Holly, and 1 apple). No trees are proposed to be removed.
RMC 4-4-070 indicates that existing trees and other vegetation shall be used to augment new
plantings for landscaping where practical, and RMC 4-7-130 requires that a reasonable effort
should be made to preserve existing trees. A Determination was made by the Director of
Development Services that the retention or replacement of 25% of the existing trees would achieve
these requirements. The applicant's proposal to retain all of the existing onsite trees would result
in the retention of 100 percent of the significant trees onsite and would comply with City's retention
requirements.
Due to the potential for site erosion to occur as a result of construction activities, staff recommends
as a condition of approval that the applicant be required to provide a Temporary Erosion and
Sedimentation Control Plan (TESCP) designed pursuant to the Department of Ecology's Erosion
and Sediment Control requirements, outlined in Volume II of the most current Stormwater
Management Manual and a Construction Mitigation Plan prior to the issuance of a Construction
permit.
Noire Relationship to Existing Uses:The properties surrounding the subject site are single-family
residences and are designated Residential—8 Dwelling Units per Acre (R-8) on the City's zoning
map. The proposal is similar to existing development patterns in the area and is consistent with the
Comprehensive Plan and Zoning Code, which encourage residential infill development.
shpltrpt doc
City of Renton P/B/PW Department Administrative Land Use Action
REPORT AND DECISION DATED January 16,2007; PROJECT LUA-06-140,SHPL-A,V-A Page 7
>) Availability and Impact on Public Services(Timeliness)
Police and Fire: Police and Fire Prevention staff indicate that sufficient resources exist to furnish
services to the proposed development, subject to the condition that the applicant provide Code
required improvements, and mitigation fees. These fees paid would help offset any additional
impacts to emergency services generated from this development. A Fire Mitigation Fee, based on
$488.00 per new single family lot with credit given for the existing single family residence and
duplex structures, are recommended in order to mitigate the proposal's potential impacts to City
emergency services. The fee is estimated at $488.00 ($488 x 1 = $488.00) and is payable prior to
the recording of the short plat.
Schools: According to the Draft Environmental Impact Statement for the City of Renton Land Use
Element (January 16, 1992), the City of Renton has a student generation factor of 0.44 students
per single family residential dwelling. Therefore, it is anticipated that the proposed short plat would
result in 0.44 (0.44 X 1 = 0.44) new children to the local schools. The Renton School District has
indicated they can accommodate the additional student generated by this proposal.
Storm Water. There are existing storm drainage conveyance facilities in the vicinity of the project
site. Drainage requirements must comply with the King County 1990 Surface Water Design
Manual. A drainage narrative prepared by NW Civil, LLC dated October 30, 2006, was submitted
with the application. The narrative indicates existing surface water currently flows downslope
where it eventually daylights in Lind Avenue SW or SW Langston Road and flows to two catch
basins located along the existing curb and gutter. The downspouts from the existing residence
may be tied into the catch basins within SW Langston Road. The narrative has been reviewed by
the City of Renton's Plan Review Section and has been prepared in compliance with the 1990 King
County Surface Water Design Manual. This project is exempt from detention and water quality per
the adopted 1990 KCSWM. All surface water improvements including, but not limited to:
conveyances, roof drains, yard drains, and any frontage improvements are required to meet City of
Renton standards. The Surface Water System Development Charges are based on a rate c
$759.00 per new single-family lot. Estimated fee based on the entire site plan is $759.00. Paymen
of this fee will be required prior to issuance of utility construction permit.
Water and Sanitary Sewer Utilities: There is an 8-inch water main in Langston Avenue SW. A
water main extension along the frontage of this parcel is required. This will entail approximately
200 lineal feet along Lind Avenue SW. The plans submitted with the application show the water
main stopping approximately 35 feet of this requirement and therefore need to be revised to extend
the water main along the full frontage. Staff recommends as a condition of approval that revised
water plans be submitted with the Utility Construction Permit application showing the water main
extension along the full Lind Avenue SW frontage of this parcel.
Fire flow requirement for single-family residences is 1,000 gpm. A hydrant is required within 300
feet of the furthest structure. If residences exceed 3,600 square feet in area (including garage
area), fire flow increases to 1,500 gpm and an additional hydrant will be required. A 5-inch quick-
disconnect fitting will be required to be installed on all new hydrants. Any existing hydrant counted
as fire protection will require installation of a "storz" quick disconnect fitting if not already in place.
All short plats shall provide a separate water service stub to each building lot prior to recording of
the plat. Separate permits for water meters will be required. Water System Development Charges
are based on a rate of $1,956 per new single-family lot. Fee based on the entire site plan is
$1,956.00. Payment of fee is required prior to issuance of utility construction permit.
There is an existing 8-inch sewer main in SW Langston Road and a 6-inch sewer main in Lind
Avenue SW. Minimum slope for side sewers shall be 2%. Dual side sewers are not allowed.
Separate sewer stubs are required to be provided to each new lot prior to recording of the short
plat. Sanitary Sewer System Development Charges are based on a rate of $1,017.00 per new
single-family lot. Estimated fees based on the entire site plan are $1,017.00. Payment of this fee
will be required prior to issuance of utility construction permit.
g) Consistency With Variance Criteria 'M`
The Administrator shall have authority to grant an administrative variance upon making a
determination, in writing, that the conditions specified below have been found to exist. Section 4-9-
250B.5.a. lists 4 criteria that the Administrator is asked to consider, along with all other relevant
shpltrpt.doc
City of Renton P/B/PW Department Administrative Land Use Action
REPORT AND DECISION DATED January 16,2007; PROJECT LUA-06-140,SHPL-A,V-A Page 8
information, in making a decision on an Administrative Variance application. These include the
following:
1. That the applicant suffers undue hardship and the variance is necessary because of
special circumstances applicable to subject property, including size, shape, topography,
location or surroundings of the subject property, and the strict application of the Zoning
Code is found to deprive subject property owner of rights and privileges enjoyed by other
property owners in the vicinity and under identical zone classification:
The applicant contends that special circumstances do exist including the location of the existing
residence on the lot and the requirement for additional right-of-way dedication and the pedestrian
access easement as a result of the proposed subdivision. Therefore, while the size of the property
and the R-8 zoning of the property permit the subdivision of the property, the requirement for a 15-
foot front yard setback from the edge of the pedestrian access easement would require the
removal of a portion or all of the existing residence. The applicant is requesting a variance to
permit the existing residence to remain at its present location and to permit the proposed access
easement to be located within 6 feet of the existing residence. The applicant also appropriately
indicated that the remaining development regulations (i.e. side and rear yard setbacks, lot
coverage and structure height) are not being varied from and the existing structures would be in
compliance with all other prescribed development standards associated with the zone.
It should also be noted that no additional construction on the existing single family residence is
planned as part of this proposal; thus the degree of the variance is not increasing as a result of the
short plat proposed by the applicant. If the variance were not granted, either a portion or all of the
existing residence would be required to be removed. Therefore, staff does recognize that special
circumstances do exist with respect to this variance application and denying the variance would
require the removal in part or all of the existing residence.
2. That the granting of the variance will not be materially detrimental to the public welfare
Vow' or injurious to the property or improvements in the vicinity and zone in which subject
property is situated:
The granting of the variance would not be materially detrimental to the public welfare. Instead, the
granting of the variance would allow for the retention of an existing residence and the dedication of
additional right-of-way along Lind Avenue SW. As proposed, the existing structure would meet all
required setback and lot coverage requirements except for the non-conforming 6-foot front yard
setback associated with the single family residence. As the building is existing and additional right-
of-way would be dedicated facilitating the construction of right-of-way improvements along the
project frontage, staff does not anticipate adverse impacts to surrounding properties with the
granting of this variance.
3. That approval shall not constitute a grant of special privilege inconsistent with the
limitation upon uses of other properties in the vicinity and zone in which the subject
property is situated:
Approval of the variance is not a grant of special privilege because the same variance would be
supported under identical circumstances where an existing residence would remain an additional
right-of-way is dedicated to the City to facilitate the construction of street improvements along the
property's frontage.
In the event the existing residence on new Lot 2 would be removed or demolished, staff
recommends a restrictive covenant be placed on Lot 2 stating that the construction of a new single
family residence on Lot 2 shall comply with all development standards of the underlying zoning
designation at the time of building permit review. This restrictive covenant would be recorded with
King County.
4. That the approval as determined by the Zoning Administrator is a minimum variance
that will accomplish the desired purpose:
The applicant is proposing a 6-foot front yard setback for an existing single family residence from a
proposed 5-foot wide pedestrian access easement. As all other setback, lot coverage and building
height standards are in compliance, and because the applicants are not proposing to increase the
shpltrpt.doc
City of Renton P/B/PW Department Administrative Land Use Action
REPORT AND DECISION DATED January 16,2007; PROJECT LUA-06-140,SHPL-A,V-A Page 9
existing building footprints, staff considers the reduction of the setback area to 6 feet to be the ,,d
minimum necessary in order to approve the two-lot short plat.
H. Findings:
Having reviewed the written record in the matter, the City now enters the following:
1. Request: The applicant has requested a two-lot Administrative Short Plat and Administrative front
yard setback Variance approval for the Collier Short Plat & Variance, File No. LUA-06-140, SHPL-A, V-A.
2. Application: The applicant's short plat and variance application complies with the requirements for
information for short plat and variance review. The applicant's short plat and variance plans and other project
drawings are contained within the official land use file.
3. Comprehensive Plan: The subject proposal is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan designations
of the Single Family Residential (SFR) land use designation.
4. Zoning: The proposal as presented, complies with the zoning requirements and development
standards (contingent upon approval of the variance) of the Residential Single Family-8 (R-8) zoning
designation, provided all advisory notes and conditions of approval are complied with.
5. Subdivision Regulations: The proposal complies with the requirements established by the City's
Subdivision Regulations for the short platting of 2 lots provided all advisory notes and conditions of approval
are complied with.
6. Existing Land Uses: Land uses surrounding the subject site include: North Residential Single Family
(zoned R-8); East: Residential Single Family(zoned R-8); South: Residential Single Family(zoned R-8); and
West: Residential Single Family(zoned R-8).
7. Setbacks: The setbacks for future development on the proposed lot would be evaluated based on the
standards applicable to lots along streets existing as of March 1, 1995. The front yard setbacks of the propose
,...4
would face to the east towards Lind Avenue SW. The existing residence complies with all of the require
setbacks provided that an administrative setback variance is granted for the front yard setback. The setbacks
for a proposed new residence on Lot 1 would be verified at the time of building permit review.
9. System Development Charges: A Water System Development Charge, a Surface Water System
Development Charge and a Sewer System Development Charge, at the current applicable rates, will be
required for the each new single-family residence as part of the construction permit.
10. Public Utilities: The applicant will be required to install individual sewer and water stubs to serve the
new lots. In addition, any existing and new fire hydrants must be fitted with 5" quick disconnect Storz fittings.
11. Consistency With Variance Criteria: The proposal meets the criteria established by City code per
Staff analysis as noted in the body of the staff report.
Conclusion:
1. The subject site is located in the Residential Single Family(RSF) comprehensive plan designation and
complies with the goals and policies established with this designation.
2. The subject site is located in the Residential—8 Dwelling Units per Acre zoning designation and
complies with the zoning and development standards (provided the variance is approved) established with this
designation (provided all advisory notes and conditions of approval are met).
3. The proposed two lot short plat complies with the subdivision regulations as established by city code
and state law.
4. The proposed two lot short plat complies with the street standards as established by city code.
5. The proposal is consistent with the established variance criteria as discussed in the body of the Staff
Report.
shpltrpt.doc
•
City of Renton P/B/PW Department Administrative Land Use Action
REPORT AND DECISION DATED January 16,2007; PROJECT LUA-06-140,SHPL-A,V-A Page 10
J. DECISION:
'i✓ The Collier Short Plat and Administrative Variance, File No. LUA-06-140, SHPL-A, V-A is approved subject to the
following conditions:
1. The applicant shall pay the required Transportation Mitigation Fee at the rate of$75.00 per net new average
daily trip associated with the project(estimated at$717.75). The Transportation Mitigation Fee shall be paid prior
to the recording of the short plat.
2. The applicant shall pay the required Fire Mitigation Fee equal to$488.00 per new single family lot estimated at
$488.00. The Fire Mitigation Fee shall be paid prior to the recording of the short plat.
3. The applicant shall provide a Temporary Erosion and Sedimentation Control Plan (TESCP)designed pursuant
to the Department of Ecology's Erosion and Sediment Control requirements, outlined in Volume II of the most
Stormwater Management Manual and a Construction Mitigation Plan prior to the issuance of a Construction permit.
4. Revised water plans shall be submitted with the Utility Construction Permit application showing the water main
extension along the full Lind Avenue SW frontage of the project site.
5. In the event the existing residence on new Lot 2 is removed or demolished, a restrictive covenant shall be
placed on Lot 2 stating that the construction of a new single family residence on Lot 2 shall comply with all
development standards of the underlying zoning designation at the time of building permit review. This restrictive
covenant shall be recorded with King County prior to the recording of the final short plat.
DATE OF DECISION ON LAND USE ACTION:
SIGNATURES:
Gregg A.Zimmerman, P/B/PW Administrator decision date
TRANSMITTED this 16th day of January to the Owner/Applicant:
Dale Collier
308 SW Langston Road
Renton, WA 98055
TRANSMITTED this 16"'day of January to the Contact:
David Thorstad
David Thorstad Architect
406 S 289th Street
Federal Way, WA 98003
TRANSMITTED this 16th day of January to the Parties of Record:
Sondra Shira
302 SW Langston Road
Renton, WA 98057
Rhoda Green
262 Lind Avenue SW
Renton, WA 98057
Brad & Rachael Grothen
225 Lind Avenue SW
Renton, WA 98057
TRANSMITTED this 16th day of January to the following:
Larry Meckiing, Building Official
Larry Rude, Fire Marshal
Neil Watts, Development Services Director
Jennifer Henning, Current Planning Manager
Jan Conklin
shpltrpt.doc
•
City of Renton P/B/PW Department Administrative Land Use Action
REPORT AND DECISION DATED January 16,2007; PROJECT LUA-06-140,SHPL-A,V-A Page 11
Carrie Olson
South County Journal
Land Use Action Appeals & Requests for Reconsideration
The administrative land use decision will become final if the decision is not appealed within 14 days of the effective date of
decision. An appeal of the decision must be filed within the 14-day appeal period (RCW 43.21.0.075(3); WAC 197-11-680).
RECONSIDERATION. Within 14 days of the effective date of the decision, any party may request that a decision on a
short plat be reopened by the Administrator. The Administrator may modify his decision if material evidence not readily
discoverable prior to the original decision is found or if he finds there was misrepresentation of fact. After review of the
reconsideration request, if the Administrator finds insufficient evidence to amend the original decision, there will be no
further extension of the appeal period. Any person wishing to take further action must file a formal appeal within the
following appeal timeframe.
APPEAL. This administrative land use decision will become final if not appealed in writing to the Hearing
Examiner on or before 5:00 PM on January 31, 2007. Appeals to the Examiner are governed by City of Renton
Municipal Code Section 4-8-110. Additional information regarding the appeal process may be obtained from the
Renton City Clerk's Office, (425)430-6510. Appeals must be filed in writing, together with the required $75.00
application fee, to: Hearing Examiner, City of Renton, 1055 South Grady Way, Renton, WA 98055.
EXPIRATION DATE: The Short Plat approval will expire two (2) years from the date of approval. An extension may be
requested pursuant to RMC section 4-7-080.M.
ADVISORY NOTES TO APPLICANT
The following notes are supplemental information provided in conjunction with the administrative land use action.
Because these notes are provided as information only, they are not subject to the appeal process for the land use actions.
Planning
1. RMC section 4-4-030.0.2 limits haul hours between 8:30 am to 3:30 pm, Monday through Friday unless otherwise
approved by the Development Services Division. The Development Services Division reserves the right to rescind
the approved extended haul hours at any time if complaints are received.
2. Commercial, multi-family, new single family and other nonresidential construction activities shall be restricted to the
hours between 7:00 a.m. and 8:00 p.m., Monday through Friday. Work on Saturdays shall be restricted to the hours
between 9:00 a.m. and 8:00 p.m. No work shall be permitted on Sundays.
3. Two ornamental trees, a minimum caliper of 1-1/2 inches (deciduous) or 6 — 8 feet in height (conifer), shall be
planted or retained within the 15-foot front yard setback area for the proposed lots.
4. A minimum 5-foot landscape strip is required along all street frontages. The landscape strip shall either consist of
Drought resistant vegetation or shall be irrigated appropriately.
5. A detailed landscape plan shall be submitted with the building permit application. All landscaping shall be installed
prior to building occupancy.
Property Services
1. Comments to be sent under separate cover.
Fire
1. A fire hydrant with 1,000 GPM fire flow is required within 300 feet of all new single-family structures. If the building
square footage exceeds 3,600 sq. ft. in area (including garage area), the minimum fire flow increases to 1,500
GPM and requires two hydrants within 300 feet of the structures.
2. Fire department access roads are required to be paved, 20 feet wide. Dead end roadways over 150 feet in length
are required to have an approved turnaround.
Plan Review—Storm/Surface Water
1. The Surface Water System Development Charges are based on a rate of $759.00 per new single-family lot.
Estimated fee based on the entire site plan is $759.00. Payment of this fee will be required prior to issuance of
utility construction permit.
Plan Review—Sewer
1. Short plats shall provide a separate side sewer stub to the new building lot. Side sewers are required be installed
prior to the recording of the short plat. No dual side sewers are allowed.
2. Sanitary Sewer System Development Charges are based on a rate of $1,017.00 per new single-family lot.
Estimated fees based on the entire site plan is $1,017.00. Payment of this fee will be required prior to issuance of
utility construction permit.
Plan Review—Water *1010
1. In accordance with the Fire Department requirement (prior to recording the short plat), at a minimum, one hydrant
within 300 feet of any proposed single family structure is required. Additional fire flow and hydrants are required if
the total square footage of the new single family residence exceeds 3,600 square feet (including garage area).
shpltrpt doc
City of Renton P/B/PW Department Administrative Land Use Action
REPORT AND DECISION DATED January 16,2007; PROJECT LUA-06-140,SHPL-A,V-A Page 12
2. A water main extension along the frontage of the project site is required. This will entail approximately 200 lineal
feet along Lind Avenue SW (note: The plans submitted with the application show the water main stopping
approximately 35 feet short of the aforementioned requirement).
3. New water service stubs to the new lot must be installed in conjunction with the above water main extension prior
to recording of the short plat.
4. Existing and new hydrants will be required to be retrofitted with Stortz"quick disconnect"fittings.
5. Water System Development Charges are based on a rate of $1,956 per new single-family lot. Fee based on the
entire site plan is $1,956.00. Payment of fee is required prior to issuance of utility construction permit.
Plan Review—Transportation
1. Street improvements including, but not limited to paving, sidewalks, curb and gutter, and storm drain will be
required along the frontage of the parcel.
3. All new electrical, phone, and cable services must be installed underground. Construction of these franchise
utilities must be inspected and approved by a City of Renton public works inspector prior to the recording of the
short plat.
Plan Review—General
1. All plans shall conform to the Renton Drafting Standards.
2. A construction permit is required. When plans are complete, three copies of the drawings, two copies of the
drainage report, a construction estimate, application and appropriate fees shall be submitted to the 6th floor
counter.
are
``Ilrr�
shpltrpt.doc
VUL./FAGt
-
nA Ott ur Examined and approved this_,day of
4V G LILLILyK ,5'hort Plat PLANNING/BUILOING/PUBLIC WORKS P i4
200 _ '_
LUA- Examined and approved Vila_day of
GRAPHIC SCALE- 1'-20'
LND — Assessor " - SCALE' INUNINIIMINI_r1111.11111MINIleIMI
I 0 20 40 60
DEDICATION
. - Deputy Aeaeeeor PORTION•OF .
KW711 Au PEOPLE Bt THESE PRESDtrs that we,the und«wtgf»d Manager. Land Use services Oivlelun NE 1/4 of SW 1/4, S. 18 T. 23 R. 5E
owner.of the land heroin deecrIbed,do hereby male a enact en Account Number
to be
' thereof pursuant to RCW 38.17.080 and declare this short plot to be the p �
graphic repn.entntlan of the wore.and O sold subdivision le made with FOUND ex( Cone 9111111 LDE 0"TIE MATTE LIDeR RIVER PST3T/E Sold On WAY
a
the treenent end In accordance with thee dein.of the°erten.
Mon with 1/4" Bross
Pin,4.82' North of 1 SE6'1531E 352.31'81 3 .14103 0
3/4. Iron Pips •
4et 2008 /
RFOUNO BURIED
CONCRETE MON
in alta.whereof w
e have eel our hands and male. Q
r� PIN,
/COPPER
�t kg*,2005
T
8
ER FD/0
Name Name
Rax C Cm
LS 34145 k N .
a 2X6REFERENCE SURVEYS
Unpla tiedSeggpgE 1¢436' l RECORD OF SURVEY.AFN 8704099019
--O RECORD OF SURVEY,AFN 20000208900002
Conor wa.nlr.gton MI6' \- ECM5EGIII225t 13400' r
yoI
I certify that I know or hove .etidoatory.adeno.that tater 9 Oo I II ORIGINAL LEGAL DESCRIPTION
LS 31145 I
---rLOT 1 OF CITY OF RENTON BOUNDARY LINE ADJUSTMENT
b
.toned Ulm,nerm.nt and ooknoel.dged M --to be(his/her)free and '�i2005 - I
- • RECORDED UNDER AUDITORS FILE No.20060427900009
voluntary act for the uses and purposes mentioned in the instrument.
I 30'
6 Loft I 5
Signature of 5.237 Sq Ft I El I
Notary Public ^�-I'
Doted ^1LI . tn
Nr appointment.,go-.. ,� r6I-+��-- .hl "'7_7=4". 401 7v. VJ
6iku31,5 w
J
Stole or Washington - +'' I p yg:•02aI Q:
County of, - _ , os r
I cert:lr that I .mw w have eabsfoctory awdente that ,� $ q
cl,
tlii
.pn.d ni.In.wm.nt and ocknowiedged d to be(m./her)free and +u § ................. • x'02 L3F 4a32• 2 I CO
voluntary awl for m. „eee and purpo...mentioned In the in.tn,ment. T�-
,.1 .,,, y�] N.
m8 . 160 -7108`— �t
CITY OF RENTON
Slgnoture of 1" t
c
Dated Pubn. ``I F LOC 2 I § -7I ELO
My appointment.ep,ree '* _, i`' I I^��� lJF-�4.rV 1 PLANNING
tB 7070 Sq Ft
— payed dnonn y i'''-' (311' ., , 11()F
- _ /� u^adt cm I with extruded Dore
5 31145
�'� Aq zoos I ��---FR"
HORIZONTAL CONTROL 005or---a Cmc Pan fir - - N £9949 I LEGEND
iy3h ` 1� - d MONUMENT FOUND THIS SURVEY li
F 6�8 `�--- Z.,:717 —- SET REBAR 6 CAP LS♦ 34145
-in-- EDGE OF PAVEMENT
Renton Control y q FOw -,---w EDGE OF PAVEMENT AT FACE OF CURB
Monum.m/ IXns3 or - 9S .7.
Encased W/T ro Si_ h LS 34145 ` -,+^�-++n BUILDING LINEIn ll
Inn Co 4/70/200tctRenton Control T`W'BF $ _ ` lT� �\ t I R4 2015 ILI
.ret/ 10 Encased Bross N Can9efon n SITE �q �� �Q DALE F. COWER a
in Concrete �4 -� 308 SW IANCSTON RD
RENTON. WA 98053
Voted 1/20/2007 of Langston
\ Encomia Concrete 425-228-21 J9 0
Iangelon \"� `_- Min with Pin M.at.21Cb
k trod
AUI)I(OP CERTIFICATE SURVEYOR'S CERTIFICATE __
/El ,CA RLCUR(I'HIS_ f,AY 01 IHIS MAP COPRECTLI RCPHESLNI;A SUI.,L, uAUC DT Mt oR �� wm DALE COWER, 206-817-55'4
D R Y C �L . , 3DB SW AF DON. RENTON, WA 99055
UNDER Mr DIRECTION IN CONFORUANI'f WITH THE REOInREuENTS
20U_ - AI _ IN Di W UI Slnlvr l5 nr THE SURVE} RECOPUINC, ACT Q " '4,3",14.
4,3", 11
DRYCOI C>'ry / •L5f OWN BY LS CHKD 8Y
pL,)tI.I,I, -- Surveying, �< PS
ti ng, Int rot-p Tratecl
,, �I f DATE JOB NO
�1 127,4 ,r.1 E ,c NI IF FAST 9/.1.2/20i
(2 v� -0300 AA ;),',-.30 � e.L,,,,°.*" 05205
•
J3-8?5-03�� FAX ;J i-FZE--y7Q V SIL LA' SCALE HEE
nlr1,111)1, _., C PHIL SARGENT L )<I a'. .__ Vn . I r' _ 2N I OF I
I
A6
a.
GENERAL NOTES. ¢
Unplatted Savorsst14255 1 — WORE SHALL CONFORMroTHERULEBMDREOUATION90F
•
a I ALL
50AE' � I S100v=eT MSS - 1,,..._
THE OF RENTON,AND ALL APPLICABLE INTATE AND
FEDERAL CODES STANDARD PLANS REFERENCED DRAWINGS REFER
I I TO THE CITY OF RENTON STANDARD PLANS.CONTRACTOR is W
NEW-Mt / RESPONSIBLE FOR INSTALLING ALL COMPONENTS IN ACCORDANCE 'Y
'.�'• wr'� :✓ /Iti r, .�IaA min THE STANDARD PUNS ANO SPECIFICATIONS PROVIDED IN THE EI
` M` • / VJJ STANDARD PLANS CONTRACTOR SHALT COORDINATE WITH THE CITY
OF RENTON FOR ALL TESTING ANO N9PECTIONS
hir \ • // P wATER MANS SHALL BE CUBS 52 CEMENT LINED DUCTILE IRON 912E
wN. G \' 'f'Rft/�iiE�ibdl'�' _-a�os b '{ -
A9 NOTED ON THE PLANS
�/ �,Il �L
/ N B MINIMUM SEPARATION OF POTABLE WATER MANS AND SANITARY
/ SEWER LINES SHALL BE TEN 00)FEET HORIZONTALLY FOR PARALLEL
x ET 'Or Y / 55iL1 50 R ``` B I OBIIOUE CR0991NGSRIPE AN0 THREE(23 EMEASURED FROM WTBIOE EDGE TO OUTSIDE
QJ ' . Nv •/ • /�. ,..-- N♦ I EDGE
% 4. aMA2{
IOL) 5.5702ssEµu yM y 4 THE CON TRACTOR SHALL NOTIFY THE CITY OF RENTON AT LEAST
.... ,•
TTN Sp Ii / . It{ SEVEN(TI DA Y S IN ADVANCE OF WET TARRING THE EXISTING WATER 41
4 ete H Im M.) —I Paved dr..,1 .. 14F. MAIN F`
C q�{ 5 LOCATIONS SHOWN ON E%IS TNG UTRITIEB ARE APPRORmATF
/to I S IDENTIFICATION,LOCATION MARKING AND RESPONSIBILITY FOR
moi, � t tea— „{ UNDERGROUND FACILITIES OR UTILITIES IS GOVERNED BY THE i
ER OVIBiONS OF CHAPTER IR 122
Y 44
/"'/' I 0 NEACCW DISINFECTED ADANCE WITH ND HEOF RENTON
RE VIS RE TORE TESTED IN
WARRINGTON
) Z / La.Z E 8 NEW WATER MAINS AND HYDRANTSTN ON REQUIREMENTS AL lINE89HALL Q
)OTO 50 R 9 IN ACCORDANCE WITH CITY OF RENTON
$ ',',,,,,77,,,,,,,,,
� tl REOUIREMENT9 I
>, �tl�. [.' 8 P ET.TAPPINGNOTS; < s
Io TAPPING TEES SHALL BE MADE OF CAST IRON.DUCTILE IRON ON a i
Co Ha.ey e.ivn+✓Y Ir 1.-P S M
N`�.� EPDXY-COATED STEEL SOL TS AND NUi99HAl BE COR TEN A
^P7TF kPo In aver rE � •�.['q TEESwE TND VAL,9 SHALL BE WATER TESTED REF ORE TAP L
' uC.6.v Io 1
A 9 GOAFAINTING9 FILTER,SURE waiTA MaG N4c, R
JBE
� { DONE BY SPEER TARS.INC,U9 FILTER,9UPERIORiaPPINO INC OR
.1.. wESTERN UTILITIES SUPPLY CO INC
tl
�a`�,0 I
S 0 CONTRACTOR 9HALL POTHOLE ANO VERIFY THE HORIZONTAL AND
'"', . ylm �I +ryroN I+ I vERPCAL ALIGNMENT OF Ems,.LINE AND SHALL START UYMp THE
y.,�!+1 • tl'T� xST,h tl NEW LINE AT THE SAME HORIZONTAL ANO VERTICAL ALIGNMENT OF
\P' .., '� { THE EX I9TING LNE
'NN\N\ N� „:1• _ CITY fORCEe WILL PERFORM THE FINAL CONNECigN FROM THE
•r 1�Q>„ T NEW WATER LNE TO THE TAPPING.VALVE WITH IN SLEEVE AND Spool
...-.4 • r`` �'N ,� H[I
R(\R\a JI e1
-----...'\,/.,_,,.. sig° N+ �N V P��vP REFERENCE SURVEYS; {{I
r] ) \• `•P\V RECORD OF SURVEY AN0]010��019 n
`�\` \N\R\ \V\ RECOROOf SURVEY AFN2000020BB00002
0Q'f}'t\ B\'. ` ORIGINAL LEGAL PEACRIPTION. '' }�
a R\ RECORDED UNDER Lc,1 OF CITY OF EAUDTORS FOE No ARY LN20000f]1E U90D004Ni C E
•
LEGEND
EXISTING SITE Thew eland.ay.."II
a„,TAIIR IIS9a,»,Ia,
AND UTILITIES _ o
� REFERENCE ELECTRONIC BASE MAP E%IS TINGINOE X CONTOUR < Z
PLAN PROVIDED BYORAC°SURVEYING vl) '
�, RPOPATED,COLLIER SNORT FIAT EXISTING CONTOUR LINE(t IN INTERVAL/ J ,)
SCALE' lI=20 Z DATED BtA 200e —"--"-- EXISTING SANITARY SEWER LINE a_ W
`_ 9[..I�� '"0 ANMI1 a`� —••--'•—I—'•— EXISTING STORM DRAIN ONE LU --'
_ .���.j(0,..7H �,(�;I”; A,--A.—e.,—_ EXISTING OAS LINE ~_ Q0' 2O AO' 6J' .Y �.. }�, YXYEMIRTNG WATER LNENzl Y Q
aIL 0 pNEWV WATER UNE LENGTH SIZE TYPE
ZOV _ .D „
ASPHALT UOADWAY I- FW
NOV
VW;
0 1 FXIBTNG MANHOLE W Z
-4 }v+>w POA r�,j OL• EXISTING LATCH BASIN
Tr''' Rl l4xr.'�,.
a'�i^ 4 NEW FIRE HYCPANT
SHEET
1 OF
__
—\ T/I —.-
/ • t N i
I
/ e 5
/ •\
' sc
I /,. •
f` 1 A.
I 1 ( , \_'-- -- --- yy
/ /i' r__ - ---- -� ' F
Ar i //, •
•
// \\ \^ �
I i
//. \
``1
jl 0 1
!. �' o z
CO / x '' m
!. a a� i * 1
0 I I—
// I E o
/ I c I yCL I Q
I a •
c
n
ss 1
iI �. a 33`9 \ti\ 16.6 ;�
/ / / w .X,',7, e ;.A;.'.' ., .
/ / . I 1111
/ �•..1 k4IXOLl OMILAMILIII tRIVIVIICOMMI1A�11~4.11 1I�7.�C401064SWRRVIONtlbK7iCL\R1\tZRC4AGIMICRR�C RA0KR�A!►RM7
I •/ "`�.'. fit;. .`. '`_,. `�. . , .,.471+���. ',X: �i. \. . ,'N►.'', � �. .�
/ / / 1i INRNI
a
0—. TS // '. .—.•—.—.•—.—,.—.— .—+—•—•—+—
o / L'n.•d ��
-�--„_.._.-�--•�-Avenue W
10 30
NEW CURB/GUTTER – r2�
AND SIDEWALK —\ u•
PLAN NL FTH) ► i
SCALE 1'=7 p•
CV 1
N0i„E5
.CONTRACTOR SHALL CONSTRUCT SIDEWALK:CURB,AN00UTTEN
^� CIAO/PTO 001,11 IMPROVEMENTS SHOWN IN ACCORDANCE WITH ALL APPLICABLE CITY
sn A OF RENTON STANDARD PUNS ANO DETAILS SIDEWALK MIO
•Im S RStµ Dw.NT� CUREVOUTTER JOINTS ARE NOT SHOWN FOR CLARITY CONTRACOTR IS yi
w,rcNPorownr...PL IM OF No+a••, RESPONSIBLE FOR FOLLOWING ALL CITY OF RENTON REQUIREMENTS J
{'n n FOR JOINT TYPE ANO SPACING Q
°A.NN."M' DEVELOPMENT PLANNING o a
w � �, CITY OF RENTON ., a
W
TYPICAL _ �� z
SIDEWALK/CURB/GUTTER y�
SECTION -
9 y�e SCALE I°-1'-0° i t I 11, w.il.
SHEET
— — `.� -- — — --- --------- - -- 2 OF-3
-- -- _——( — —
O • S
L
•
�'` /` i/ ° it 5
0 / // CD a a •
F jI l 0
° a • 11
n
/ 9 \ a- m f i
\ ° 33.9' —�' 6.6' I fOLYPER TARO.LP 4 4 }
I / /
. l
II WAR TAR
/ / / o "P' I o •
/ 1151,
•
. Nva teleit as®��®®®�����aa'��'a'a``a`o'®'�`v`�`t`�`�`�`t�����r��®O� ':'\ .,�
r °ay /
• •`l—a a_»..—a.—» » »— __•.—»..N N»—.—»— N—»— •._»—.—.•N»—»—»--L. .—,R- --"--"—"--"-- ---"i__ —'F—"—
o h t� ' �n,M%,L. a;,n.neB�IR ,ANo A ve n u -• _ ' ) NORTH)� ,
Linda�Ro�, %,L,
GpYVI00INB.PPn 1�•• a'n➢ND�FIxW)ue¢o Ae • MAMMAL
RroLraoowoonn rm.
"
/ /' ^ NonnoPUNnHe obunLaamrrDFc,uev. q
�'^ Q / —'"--• aineoonAne un NWT. _�_o. W—..,—,,_„ a,— T..—a• ..—.'—L w ,14
oL �o zo' 3m ���
• l- .LI
,
RO
135
CO OEM CONNEct INT„ LAP •
ROeR
135
N
N'ro OANER N r
130 130
. w aPLL,a,,,,,
o NaPReRERT q
e —
> I J
125 IL
`, 125 '
co
Lj>
_I/ Rbcs
120 '�/..R..Ea�a ,A+ 0.1 120 Ai,,
LT-, o W „ I � L1
115 o 5 t 5 w %i
yy+ .- w w ��� 115
i _� NOTES
a } m
110 LI 11.1 w ,�/// aY �// �� ry wrr^TERLiRE ' ^ 110 I CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR VERDYING DEPTH,SIZE,ANO
f9FE� _I,JI LOCATION Of EXISTING UTILITIES PRIOR TO LAY NG NEW wnTER ONE
/EB Ticn.moss Z 1 ENGINEER SHALL 9E NOTIFIED OF.wvCHANGES FROM WHAT:9
v�nRu„nc� 1/N//" Ep —�-— SHOWN IN THESE DRAWINGS w
/ / CONTRACTOR SHALL POTHOLE AND VERIFY THE TOR ZONTAL ANO W J
105 •. _ 105 NEW ONE ALIGNMENT E Non'Iio�NTATINE AND VERTICALL....NTOFTHE J_0
fYlEwL OTFSER THE EXISTING ONE CL
/i- rRT:eFr,oNiEL.• NEW WATER i0 PERFORM
HE NO VALVE WAL DIiNOCT EEVERMID9OM TPOOL E wa
CONTRACTOR SHALL LEAVE APPRO%0 FEEL BETWEEN THE TAPPING 100 \\„,,�. s::u�:To NUSFAni ii I _ 100 GATE VALVE AND VERNAL CROSS FOR THE FINAL CONNECTON 3 Q
C) ..nl„ ..,....TTR E,l9.wsTORAitNE ., ,
z
E
W
> 109 05 114 98 123 05 131 23 ° v L ���,r P�/-I��I��G z a
O N O� 1� 0 N Lo 0 LO O� n T1ETV MO N
O O O 0 ,-
H=1 :20 NO 2006
SHEET
�fc-, , . 3 of
2. 1
.... .
c. ,)
..------"N
1 N't
t
CI I
1-,4-
.
I ' )
,,..
: 11c
IIE'T I--
0
,•,, ,,, 1._.--T _.1 i _
- ,.......„_. I -
) *
...J 1-
!-
_,
1-:e....,171r,'El-c.a: ...,
z
Itto,‘
ir _
z.--' z
,
____„....._.: -
_
- ...,L__ -_:
,..,
- -- --, r-„. ii
i
,. =7•1 I i.,..i
1F .
i 4
ILY 7'-
•1
-_
- --
u) z
..'
:Lc
-,--:- ."--"--<'
_
L-7 .1.1,-,1-1
..'
_
Vi k
I. -
7-..-,,K ,,
t i
, --
, _ ,,:-„,,,-74.e-riri-4-,,;: L.,-7-
,.. ......,
/< itr-,, ,
f I,
.,E-VELOPMEN
1
1 i
1 -
T PLANNING
CITY 01:Fk WON
NJ V , 9 2006
..x...„...
l--
1
----- H-'111-
----7.
v
q -
CCEOltEp)
, ( .
(
E3 - 7T23N R5E W1/2
/) R-8 _F_.,.- -
r (Y
RM-F
NW 4tlS,00
-. ; R-8 ' I 0
'1
CA
R—g (y rd
PI.',ow, >R-8
---- I Jc R 11R-, C
t --
0
e� R-8
fi cu
R-8 R .
_ S 13-2nj t. 1 2nd St
CA
o
-
CA
,(x CA iCA
S 'I
n Ave. --10 �---
gen ° IR-8
i -- 4._ IC
- V _t011; tik c� CA
cu 9
N R-10 0 n ,zi
s 1 nd s ' CA u w
�. R-8 ►► an C A CA H
_ s W
N R-8 �R-80012 Pi• -. - „ „II".
W R . � . XI
H • R-8(P) % R-8 ! "`
ti
*ow : On R-10 ai
N R-8�; R-8 �� e R,8 **R• CA ` S 3rC
w Syy �' R�8 N
`t' P GAJ
8 0 31�' Al ' '' co CA - CAS 3
4th �� R-8 R_g � i ��� e c.
1
CAC
-F tagilF 9,
SW 5th ct RM—F
c''
SW CA
C0� RM—F ����1 ��
RM-F
I M (itVst. IM - CA CA CA
C ,
:M IM IM IM CA Cy7-
4110•,
cti
G3 - 19 T23N R5E W 1/2 Yq
7 2 O 4 O
c.16 ��' ZONING ———— Renton City Umita 1:4800 F
\41“._,Z.,
��«/ P/B/PW TECHNICAL SERVICES 18 T23N R5E W 1/2
F N't% 02/16/06
5318
R
fi
CITY OF RENTON COUNCIL AGENDA BILL
AI#: ,"!
Illio Submitting Data: For Agenda of:
Dept/Div/Board.. EDNSP/Strategic Planning June 4, 2006
Staff Contact Don Erickson (x6581) Agenda Status X
Consent X
Subject: Public Hearing..
Marshall Annexation - 60% Direct Petition to Annex Correspondence..
Ordinance
Resolution
Old Business
Exhibits: New Business
Issue Paper Study Sessions
60% Direct Petition Information
King County Certification Document
Recommended Action: Approvals:
Council concur in setting a public hearing for June 18, Legal Dept
2007. Finance Dept
' Other
Ilioi Fiscal Impact:
Expenditure Required... Transfer/Amendment
Amount Budgeted Revenue Generated
Total Project Budget N/A City Share Total Project..
SUMMARY OF ACTION:
The Council received a 60% Direct Petition on May 15, 2006, to annex approximately 7.6-
acres of unincorporated King County located within Renton's Potential Annexation Area. The
proponent's petition was certified on March 20, 2007, as having signatures representing at least
60% of the area's assessed value.
Under state law, if the Council decides to accept the 60% Direct Petition, it is required to hold
at least two public hearings 30-days apart on future zoning. The site is currently designated
Residential Single Family (RS) as shown on the City's Comprehensive Plan Land Use Map and
most likely would be zoned R-8, eight units per net acre, if annexed into the City. The
Administration is seeking to hold the first of these hearings on zoning on June 18, 2007.
The Administration is also seeking authorization to forward the Notice of Intent Package to the
Boundary Review Board for their mandatory 45-day review, if Council decides to accept the 60%
Direct Petition.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION: .
tikoiSet June 18, 2007, for a public hearing to decide whether to accept the 60% Direct Petition to
annex for the Marshall Annexation and whether to forward the Notice of Intent Package to the
Boundary Review Board.
Rentonnet/agnbill/ bh
'S,(°( ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT,
NEIGHBORHOODS, AND STRATEGIC
cml
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
MEMORANDUM
DATE: May 21, 2007
TO: Toni Nelson, Council President
Members of the Renton City Council
VIA: Kathy Keolker, Mayor
FROM: - Alex Pietsch, Administrator
STAFF CONTACT: Don Erickson (6581)
SUBJECT: Marshall Annexation - Consideration of 60% Direct
Petition to Annex and Possible Future Zoning
ISSUE:
• Whether the City Council wants to accept the 60% Direct Petition to Annex
` we for the Marshall Annexation now that the petition has been certified as
sufficient by the King County Department of Assessments?
• If Council decides to accept the 60% Direct Petition to Annex, whether
future zoning, consistent with the current Comprehensive Plan Residential
Single Family land use designation, would be appropriate if the area
annexes?
• If Council accepts the 60% Direct Petition to Annex, whether it wishes to
authorize the Administration to forward the Notice of Intent package to the
Boundary Review Board (BRB)?
RECOMMENDATION:
The Administration recommends that Council:
• Accept the 60% Direct Petition to Annex for the 7.6-acre Marshall Annexation site.
• Support future R-8 zoning on the non-street portions of this annexation consistent
with the Comprehensive Plan Residential Single Family (RS) land use designation.
• Authorize staff to forward the Notice of Intent package for the Marshall Annexation
*kr to the BRB for King County for their mandatory 45-day review.
h:\ednsp\paa\annexations\marshall\60%issue paper.doc
Toni Nelson, Council President
Page 2 of 2
May 21,2007
BACKGROUND SUMMARY: ;,
110
At its October 16, 2006, public meeting, Council decided to accept the 10% Notice of
Intent to Commence Annexation petition and authorized circulation of a 60% direct
petition to annex. Council at that time specified that petitioners agree to support future
zoning consistent with the current Comprehensive Plan land use designation and assume
their proportionate share of the City's outstanding indebtedness upon annexation to the
City.
The 60% Direct Petition to Annex was submitted on March 20, 2006, and certified by
the King County Department of Assessments as having signatures representing at least
60% of the area's assessed valuation on April 19, 2006. Council is now being asked to
decide whether it wishes to accept the 60% Direct Petition to Annex and forward it on
to the BRB. If it decides to accept the 60% Direct Petition, it also will need to consider
future zoning for the site, assuming the BRB also supports it.
The Comprehensive Plan Land Use Map designation for the subject site is Residential
Single Family (RS). The RS designation allows RMH and R-8 zoning, the latter at
eight units per net acre. King County currently has R-4 zoning on the annexation site.
The County R-4 zone allows 4 units per gross acre, and with bonuses, allows up to 6
units per gross acre. This density equates to approximately 7.5 units per net acre, or
almost the same as Renton's R-8 zone, at a maximum of 8.0 units per net acre.
Reviewing staff raised no significant objections to this annexation. There is a general
deficiency in the area for parks and Community Services estimates that to comply with
citywide recreation standards a one-time expenditure of$25,530 for parks acquisition and
improvements. If the area were up-zoned in the future, however, these costs would
change. Similarly, the PBPW Department estimates a cost of approximately $25,000 to
do a street overlay of SE 107th Place. Staff estimates a slight deficit to the City of
approximately$3,009 per year in today's dollars.
CONCLUSION:
The proposed Marshall Annexation has now been certified as having signatures
representing at least 60% of the area's assessed value. It also has reasonable
boundaries and appears to comply with relevant City annexation policies and BRB
objectives.
Based upon the above and the previously submitted analysis in the 10% Notice of Intent
issue paper, staff concludes that the proposed Marshall Annexation, with R-8 zoning,
would be consistent with Renton's Comprehensive Plan, be a logical extension of City
services such as sewer and water, and be in the general welfare and interest of the City.
h:\ednsp\paa\annexations\marshall\60%issue paper.doc
- Lz in 11- i.. I I -- J -
/ A
Q mv)t i 1, - ' '
u
*2 Mk: \ II
4116,,,in ■ ■i ■■ l
mg di I IIer
tl ■s ii. LL'Vr'' am U/ - -
!'STLJWI■ II'IVPII
II&
���1 � � 1 :4 j✓ ,
► 11■; a�, aai� r. 1111■ Vay��� ,
= !III f �7. ■ gi is
t, 41 -
,. 'miniboom. mai r •vEP4IJ ■_ \1�I� X1111
,rr , ‘t ,, Iola all Pii !ILIUM] atip.
1 174
p ._a 11�� II: Er=i om
I'� � ui■�rJ j 11 aim punk. mummming—/�'01,1,4:042namito la. lavetwoRk 0 o*ti II
u�11jj u :i��aei■ ��� 1 ,-9i gm. J= gi *i1'�
Afor
1 . ---- ' 1511411112; ikign v • sr -_1. *sae II 4.—V- - a
r , ..:-- - VI
Nog Li NI__ 111111 1 — II 1—"Tm I4 ii
W, 4 tf iii ti
-, adosto. 1111 k 4:0 l*WI% - 1
- 1 L,J
i
Mil - r i.-__,,,_ 7 _ lb • ift,
um
'--2°- \\,. PA- A•001 --.... NI
i , I ' 1
' ,M ► 1 I t %,
S��s. - ma -- ,,- - '40
-
ll �� < -
_ I. , _____ EIN
r .__, alir !IP _ _I_
•
,;I
4
_ Ash
' ' RI ': J'1.1 - 6 '--- 1 _ _ 1 _ iii
a=lt.
n\I-4- 1 4-4_i_:_ r , , N1,,,,-‘Liptig : __, ,,,, ,„, 41. , I MIMI
'th Ct_.- , s' ------ :„ A ±g. - V 1 le t______ , I , i ______, , ,„ , „ „_= = i
. . ___
A- hiiiiiiiri
INE 10th St u 1
I L� —
E '0h S.
L — r j,A
St __ ..., ,
. --' J
.
i• �1 {� N E 9 t y�1•11 1 __
E. in Iv mu' 9th Cto al M El I
III
is
11� �; �� NE 8th St '" -
L tin "..iii
Z 1� .
r .' � '11J
*It..roposed Marshall Annexation 0 800 1600
Vicinity Map
c o„{, Economic Development,Neighborhoods&Strategic Planning 1 : 9600
.( 1. Alex Re[sch,AJmmtstnt°r -- - City Limits
G Dcl Rosano
�'�N.ro, 28 June 2606 I I Study Area
r 4 7 -- - rte- " iJT ��s 1)76. 1 _.,� 0 Lj
14 %0 rtw.4. _o 0 -u-- Q-1 OP.Ilielcg o 111111111111a
gm Atm . , ft tin ar - kiT ' . 0 -- it 1
Nan* u 1 --3 aalwaltilfal 1 111111111111111rN11111ii
_o___ 0 r_72.1
107,,-,_,girt= Itovil Li;111 art)
...er-10,-ip on A /- D „rp nu IIKO,
1 IAD mair timatt LA ii iv a c=1 Z nip&
,-- �'� 1
tRi r1414 cAll ingelik 0 0 C3 wir_ - A "
*V <Ns' a ,R 10111 qi 0 iii ° u hill Iow * 0 0 ' oil blwritr# - Li) A41 9
4p (60 & 4tfp sr- _ III Mi. e _
mo' �►� � NJ
• ? ' h144
s
IL CP 4,* , ;."., , v I
gat --05 . 3,
F -ILO le
ir .�►� ftp , 17Ill ea%
:�, qv I _ m in
_ ( .1,q 7
. 11,ftli:4=-Jipiimo as um la mi. ...„ fh -___I _r_i smi s
cr 1,11 110111 1 0 53 0
I El _ 0 _ 1 1 I I
, on 0 :j, ..t iiii 0 1 � I
M - rilig
M II �gki
dQ .. ___ ii,
noo colL-7 u, 0 4
n ,)1 0 ,1_11 1 - („ % n
,D 401 ,----1 u 00 ci
• iii <::::c 0., ,
i &ls5\ Iwo
0 NI
tit
0 --- .� a❑ ❑❑❑❑1
. � q �0
= N.j - -io0 0 iT hrt,
° �o
Proposed Marshall Annexation 0 300 600
Structure Map IsEmosamiumgoassmagammozas
GtijY O� Economic Development,Neighborhoods&Strategic Planning Structure 1 : 3 600
�i � Atcx Pictsch,Administrator — City Limits
G Did Rosario
� � zR,n�e zoos I I Study Area
CITY OF RENTON
MAR 2 0 2007
PETITION TO ANNEX TO THE CITY OF RENTQN,VED
UNDER RCW 35A.14.120
,44
sof Applicant: a c-5 6/dSs
(60% Petition —Marshall Annexation) Address: 370 N
TO: THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RENTON renAilta 1,01 9yor6
1055 South Grady Way
Renton, WA 98055 Telephone No.11?-cl-1i 6 11
The undersigned are owners of not less than sixty percent (60%) in value according to the
assessed valuation for general taxation, of real property located contiguous to the City of Renton.
We hereby petition that such property be annexed to the City of Renton under the provisions of
RCW 35A.14.120 et seq.
The territory proposed to be annexed is within King County, Washington, and is contiguous to
the City of Renton. A map (Exhibit 1) and legal description (Exhibit 2) are included as part of
this petition.
In response to a duly filed and considered "Notice of Intention to Commence Annexation
Proceedings, the City Council of the City of Renton met with the initiating parties under RCW
35A.14.120 on October 16, 2006. The City Council then determined that the City would accept
the proposed petition and issue a 60% Direct Petition. Further, pursuant to RCW 35A.14.120,
the undersigned petitioners to said 60%Direct Petition shall agree to:
(1) Accept the City's Comprehensive Plan land use designations as they
affect the subject property;
low
(2) Accept City zoning consistent with these Comprehensive Plan land
use designations; and,
(3) Assume their proportional share of the City's pre-existing bonded
indebtedness.
all as noted in the minutes of the Council meeting and contained in the electronic recording of
such meeting.
WHEREFORE, the undersigned property owners petition the City Council and ask:
(a) That the City Council fix a date for a public hearing about such
proposed annexation, cause a notice to be published and posted,
specifying the time and place of such hearing, and inviting all
persons who are interested to appear at the hearing and state their
approval or disapproval of such annexation or to ask questions; and
(b) That following such hearing, and consistent with any approval by the
Boundary Review Board, the City Council by ordinance annex the
above described territory to become part of the City of Renton,
Washington, subject to its laws and ordinances then and thereafter in
force, and to receive City public services.
This two page form is one of a number of identical forms which comprise one petition seeking
the annexation of the described territory to the City of Renton, Washington as above stated, and
may be filed with other pages containing additional signatures.
Page 1 of 2
Annexation 60% Direct Petition to Annex •
WARNING: Every person who signs this petition with any other than his or her true name, or who
knowingly signs more thaw-One of these petitions, or signs a petition seeking an election when he or
she is not a legal voter, or signs a petition when he or she is otherwise not qualified to sign, or who
makes herein any false statement, shall be guilty of a misdemeanor.
The undersigned have read the above petition and consent to the filing of this petition.
(Names ofpetitioners should be in identical form as the same that appear on record in the chain of title to the real estate.)
'"ryg'.."5} x`x°c{u >101, -1 v_= -,,',i -`-,.'ns2ix`.;ir.a',' 5:fa.:.�nz':,: _ - �> su.. sr;,4.,<i.�rY.^d__�`._ .may "3x.La+'w,, _
- ,•'sM�?�..� - �__..?::sr s':; ,�:_.� t.sem.- s :<,..'.,":.;�-.:_�
". ` �ti..='�'s- - l��it �'f1� 1A�"
- .�3F^ ...��'�' '�.� - •`i.- - �:'.�,.'��',.. _..�,. �:"`.s"'�.w -�.._ 'may -•�:..,,-.
m'c, ' iew'"-s °. ,.. e�''�..:w'3'`. +v'< �'v.;`ds"u. - '.a-xf •"-n;''g=.,;3; .� 'i. ., ;'_';`
f•,
7yn rte^ _,ta, - - f"`} ..3 M1 r�l r_ a.;,°',, �1. __;:::',�' �:az '.: _ .:A. : ,;;;
.. _._.. ... .rk._.�;� �.� . . ""'x ..,.�. .. HCI` .. is_,
V06
610i - c . l45-f 12ry m'J 9,c) 6-4
a/ c J./ ' ,iw / 3f
2. �y '� �� A77° 3/0
ev
3. yit/ 13&-2,t) <c (o7e_,
/ °I/ I • _ - r
l3cAg /09 _ p3 1.71 5-0 —O Cs
4. /Vo
D ;ih4 � e n �� X111 � e ' 14 c-
5. 2,-"V
- i4/s
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
11.
12.
Page 2 of 2
1JfLc 4 c L
?•'w•.t Annexation 60% Direct Petition to Annex
WARNING: Every person who signs this petition with any other than his or her true name, or who
Nome
knowingly signs more than one of these petitions, or signs a petition seeking an election wizen he or
she is not a legal voter, or signs a petition when he or she is otherwise not qualified to sign, or who
makes herein any false statement, shall be guilty of a misdemeanor.
The undersigned have read the above petition and consent to the filing of this petition.
(Names of petitioners should be in identical form as the same that appear on record in the chain of title to the real estate.)
`i" 'x^xf` .s ,�` ' ., � � .s-, t .'i 'tea u-" �t
•
` �'-_"i�- -'iY+�b;1, v.l 1 � .� � --^��,�---�,—.s,fit r; ,f'' "-..-:
B 0 1 •- '-f'""' --,,f,,-�a,'+:oma s- It rr.--,_- 0„ , `wy' 1•� k-,-----..'-'741.-
v
r _
1.,
\11* j`e-P149\1 l EE-I.,W6. P--��v_i tai
j 7 r/( ('-) - ?0,e r)
Stephen & Linda Hagg „--
13613 SE 107th Place ,„
E Renton, WA 98059
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
11.
12.
Page 2 of 2
a
f ito `� .tiAk .
n Annexation 60% Direct Petition to Annex
WARNING: Every person who signs this petition with any other than his or her true name, or who
knowingly signs more than one of these petitions, or signs a petition seeking an election when he or
she is not a legal voter, or signs a petition when he or she is otherwise not qualified to sign, or who
retakes herein any false statement, shall be guilty of a misdemeanor.
The undersigned have read the above petition and consent to the filing of this petition.
(Names of petitioners should be in identical form as the same that appear on record in the chain of title to the real estate.)
..3`,2-E. ,' e� # :7c , , cog -7- : �'' �ity � s � s
, ,. g ,. E 4 -
X44-
-.. +,r x. .._,. Tom',.... . 4.a:,0...74 - - .. .,-4r 1 . ,y,"_ s- y—..- , Q
_ . �
r _ ,e .,.' e''-7,..
C
1. e` .l/7
---) ,,
tt
,, r V .i1:2,1 } !Lf
Jerrod & Michelle Riske \
13612 SE 107`h Place
1.-. \ Renton, WA 98059 ,5`ll `` .. co
\ A '
1.‘'\J�('")hC-� i--,_ k,-,. \ice..
FdJ
ii p --, IS�1
4����� �4itl "S
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
11.
NIS
12.
Page 2 of 2
n Annexation 60% Direct Petition to Annex
WARNING: Every person who signs this petition with any other than his or her true name, or who
knowingly signs more than one of these petitions, or signs a petition seeking an election when he or
she is not a legal voter, or signs a petition when he or she is otherwise not qualified to sign, or who
makes herein any false statement, shall be guilty of a misdemeanor.
The undersigned have read the above petition and consent to the filing of this petition.
(Names ofpetitioners should be in identical form as the same that appear on record in the chain of title to the real estate.)
ariStrA
- �f . -� - 1' €
— ° 4^ s * . 1:z ;� '5
`�--„s' + V.f � 4'I' 3r � ` 's ,,',. '.:"..'''''1.4-4
..4'' �`f 1
, e ( `�A: -. -_ 1y . S - " � € -0445;Z- -te
a
a � a - 'r^' — mos ". he. Ka st` 1 £ tS`
if
1 _/ =e * fn'm1. :.
ektirt) di-e9
1 r 1.3q4/5E70 7 r1, / /-, Yfroco
, \ R1C-ivcrI L , ©(P9/1/4 r / :2'1 .nl Lc_)1 780 59
Richard Holman
1 13644 SE 107t11 Place
Renton, WA 98059
'3\ \
4.
5.
6.
7.
_ - --, - -
8.
9.
10.
11 .
12.
Page 2 of 2
•.t!* :n Annexation 60% Direct Petition to Annex
WARNING: Every person who signs this petition with any other than his or her true name, or who
knowingly signs more than one of these petitions, or signs a petition seeking an election when he or *411100
she is not a legal voter, or signs a petition when he or she is otherwise not qualified to sign, or who
makes herein any false statement, shall be guilty of a misdemeanor.
The undersigned have read the above petition and consent to the filing of this petition.
(Names ofpetitioners should be in identical form as the same that appear on record in the chain of title to the real estate.)
" -e. T F^' '.4
-r51- r*' :-
sikk'`
�����`A �-��T'i c -�
z F r^. ,fizz F` .'* A -,t
•... , �` s
/ -7 a6 et„,
•
1 . /l r2,q
Gv c�t'� lC�
Paul &Tran Nguyen
10715 138, `t' Avenue SE
r ' RentonWA 98059
4.
•
5. '),\ 1) \-_,„ 7 v ) ( r c Cat ikr;
ci!c,i7es -1'71
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
11 .
12.
Page 2 of 2
' JagCnexation 60% Direct Petition to Annex
WARNING: Every person who signs this petition with any other than his or her true name, or who
Nome
knowingly signs more than one of these petitions, or signs a petition seeking an election when he or
she is not a legal voter, or signs a petition when he or she is otherwise not qualified to sign, or who
makes herein any false statement, shall be guilty of a misdemeanor.
The undersigned have read the above petition and consent to the filing of this petition.
(Names ofpetitioners should be in identical form as the same that appear on record in the chain of title to the real estate.)
..,--7-A DI_ Imam E'i ..',',�����^�.,,.,,f������rQ g°r � dw,— -i -=a -z�a� aim b�' B„.-1—`� wi
.,.z 4�_.� '-''...._,--..`; z� .,-..---.. tf-4"-1.1, -`,..,.. .. 'r;�,..fid' �7 10147, *-i='a �..z'-_ .a<
' l; ----- lj ? i • �1Z(': ' ' 23(i,If 5E /U7.
1. i f Fr,(E -- '? ,/k1 c it)e 7/ K,, -, ,yj G;/c ,',)s 7
,,a \ t,,,(77( -c),3.s.
Douglas & Linda McNiell
A \
13641 SE 107th Street y t ' ?c' r'� c
Renton, WA 98059 _ ft
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
11.
12.
Page 2 of 2
•
441444„sal Annexation 60% Direct Petition to Annex
WARNING: Every person who signs this petition with any other than his or her true name, or who
knowingly signs more than one of these petitions, or signs a petition seeking an election when he or
she is not a legal voter, or signs a petition when he or she is otherwise not qualified to sign, or who
makes herein any false statement, shall be guilty of a misdemeanor.
The undersigned have read the above petition and consent to the filing of this petition.
(Names of petitioners should be in identical form as the same that appear on record in the chain of title to the real estate.)
try
-
�E r � � a. 3 a � •> € � mr. ,yam 4. ` �e'y'-".'�-n-�-t
., - ,. ,,§i�. .. , 1VAI A'— 1 iit .., _aF-;:Stz�, �,' F"- 0-W?-:
pa ..�.r..f Ste- 44'' �� * sYy'
`'," IE .�., -�->.� �. I ow: I`oE 9 x s�-' '``},,.,��` �t - .�'� s >
'� _.a ��_.�fi��4'.E2 ' .� ..,...,- .,d ,..��x„� ..s..... ex 'A" s .w,
/ ,�% y �' �f -::, ! / 54 /070,5-
f 1 .21 r 5 ' 7 c `71
3;
c.
-G,i CS 4-7) C1
f• `� Bradley Clark
13651 SE 107th Street -
Renton, WA 98059
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
11.
12.
Page 2 of 2
Annexation 60% Direct Petition to Annex
WARNING: Every person who signs this petition with any other than his or her true name, or who
Nome
knowingly signs more than one of these petitions, or signs a petition seeking an election when he or
she is not a legal voter, or signs a petition when he or she is otherwise not qualified to sign, or who
makes herein any false statement, shall be guilty of a misdemeanor.
The undersigned have read the above petition and consent to the filing of this petition.
(Names of petitioners should be in identical form as the same that appear on record in the chain of title to the real estate.)
aY - }
B •"�� `w-�- 11 col aII - .f�` ° R� "`'3" 1 1 y #s .r ,,,,, e e:i: Ru :.
s._�3_..a aY,__.r- 2 : 'y, .�.:.b'^I'^a R �. o.,�..-+{ 'i' ` ;' - .* r�
`�-ca_
/ 1 .
ins I
Michael Sweet °' C)
13603 SE 107th Place —
Renton, WA 98059 ,
�ff /
l�_ <` Kl i/d c!t L_' s71-. f p
New
( s 1 J
`- t .' �/-�
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
11.
lowie
12.
Page 2 of 2
047::
09 7 ' J FfL
Annexation 60% Direct Petition to Annex
WARNING: Every person who signs this petition with any other than his or her true name, or who
knowingly signs more than one of these petitions, or signs a petition seeking an election when he or
she is not a legal voter, or signs a petition when he or she is otherwise not qualified to sign, or who
makes herein any false statement, shall be guilty of a misdemeanor.
The undersigned have read the above petition and consent to the filing of this petition.
(Names ofpetitioners should be in identical form as the same that appear on record in the chain of title to the real estate.)
aKrtMOWATIP
;cG-tc�3 �. --
s
'F-- -'F "vt- i~c • se a ..
1. eScr1 /0‘2_ / `�r� e S ° `/ f `
,, --� AN a
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
11. .4.00
12.
Page 2 of 2
Annexation 60% Direct Petition to Annex
WARNING: Every person who signs this petition with any other than his or her true name, or who
Nosy
knowingly signs more than one of these petitions, or signs a petition seeking an election when he or
she is not a legal voter, or signs a petition when he or she is otherwise not qualified to sign, or who
makes herein any false statement, shall be guilty of a misdemeanor.
The undersigned have read the above petition and consent to the filing of this petition.
(Names ofpetitioners should be in identical form as the same that appear on record in the chain of title to the real estate.)
»y.. .. sAZZM- .. '--n-�--� �=4:71a-5-4
:7 _r
i1 . /1; C' _
2.
3. 1
4.
New
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
11.
12.
Page 2 of 2
�n Annexation 60% Direct Petition to Annex •
WARNING: Every person who signs this petition with any other than his or her true name, or who
knowingly signs more than one of these petitions, or signs a petition seeking an election when he or
she is not a legal voter, or signs a petition when he or she is otherwise not qualified to sign, or who
makes herein any false statement,shall be guilty of a misdemeanor:
The undersigned have read the above petition and consent to the filing of this petition.
(Names of petitioners should be in identical form as the same that appear on record in the chain of title to the real estate.)
,*
1111 q 1111 1141 ::..7!;,-11".";,..- 11,IBi i1 1 1 {9i,k9
az • E 1 Dads 1i IeII ;IN Ei6 `f. • t } Is
'.... .......»v..... n ..•• ._......��jj- .._•r.•.. .11_•.,:. '•••.....:'•:..: .- ..•_. . .v. .•. `..:.Yic...�l.•.L..u_...... _ ... �. ...
• • • 31� ' L.. .f.
. 1.�'
1-/912k
y P. ` '(4 i / // . 7 o g/j�1 5-f/ t,41T(7--PAitstm [_,7bs p
res Al'76 tofEll4ir
1. l3/b7 i ,/ �4ILL it '/ ✓¢9/0 771x la#-6-(6f70--047
2. / _(kc Fi ,1 ite L.- �lst)v .-�, P .4p�7b :lo -06;20
/y bp
�3�� SE f�� .
_ 3.1....C).,___.,2?-4_,_
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
11.
12.
Page 2 of 2
•
` —_ ,J ...J--I"-1
MERCER / . NEWCASTLE :`)
ISLAND
!.AKS;S,!BEN I
1
``` Merritt II (Phase II)
52.7 ac.
�
_.--.- 4- - Aster Park
/#1/,:,
gP.
LAV,AJHLNGTON . --- _ ... 18.5 ac. -
`. - lit
Marshall
7.7 ac.
i
i
F. -
L.1
. T--11--- -1I
Itioo
Z_ Leitch
16.2 ac. !AK
e LibertyJ
Hudson i,,,
�-L i 184.2 ac.
14.6 ac. -" --
i rf- J
l.s--
t---..1
I `t7
4/
I `ti
_j__________........._ t-----/
LAIIF"d'JESIRI:
112
,c
I I \ i
6
t .
1
\ i
KENT L nl. F.
, PANTHER!.AKE
L_ . , . City of Renton
Benson Hill , 1.4 Current Annexations
_ I URBAN B!IJNUARY
Communities CITY I.INffIC
I 2437.9 ac. 1 I A(I IVL ANN!XATIt1N
J
I Economic Development,Neighborhoods&Strategic Planning
f •
vin I. ni.,r=t.cn�.ns—
Ie r.n:.I
n ` 'e o 21 May 2007
King County
Department of Assessments Scott Noble
King County Administration Bldg. Assessor
500 Fourth Avenue,Room 708
Seattle,WA 98104-2384
(206)296-5195 FAX(206)296-0595
Email:assessor.info@metrokr.gov
www.metrokc.gov/assessor/
ANNEXATION PETITION CERTIFICATION
THIS IS TO CERTIFY that the petition submitted March 30, 2007 to
the King County Department of Assessments by Don Erickson,
Senior Planner for the City of Renton, supporting the annexation to
Renton of the properties described as the Marshall Annexation, have
been examined, the property taxpayers, tax parcel numbers, and
assessed value of properties listed thereon carefully compared with
the King County tax roll records, and as a result of such examination,
found to be sufficient under the provisions of the Revised Code of
Washington, Section 35A.01.040.
The Department of Assessments has not verified that the signature
on the petition is valid through comparison with any record of actual
signatures, nor that the signature was obtained or submitted in an
appropriate time frame, and this document does not certify such to
be the case.
Dated this 19th of April, 2007
Scott Noble, King County Assessor
.01202M
CITY OF RENTON COUNCIL AGENDA BILL
1AI#: 1P / '
1 Submitting Data: For Agenda of:
'40,0, Dept/Div/Board.. Economic Development, June 4, 2007
Neighborhoods, and Strategic
Planning
Staff Contact Don Erickson, x-6581 Agenda Status
Consent X
Subject: Public Hearing..
Aster Park Proposed Annexation- Effectuation and Correspondence..
zoning ordinances Ordinance
Resolution
Old Business
Exhibits: New Business
Issue Paper Study Sessions
Boundary Review Board Closing Letter Information
Ordinances
Recommended Action: Approvals:
Council concur to set a public hearing date for June 18, Legal Dept X
2007 Finance Dept
Other
Fiscal Impact:
Expenditure Required... Transfer/Amendment
1/40101 Amount Budgeted Revenue Generated
Total Project Budget N/A City Share Total Project
SUMMARY OF ACTION:
Council accepted the 60%Petition to Annex in November 2006 and at that time, authorized staff
to forward the Notice of Intent package to the Boundary Review Board for King County(BRB).
In April of this year, the City received the closing letter from the BRB with an effective approval
date of April 4, 2007. The proposed 18.48-acre Aster Park Annexation site is located west of the
west side of 148th Avenue SE, at the edge of the Urban Growth Boundary, and immediately south
of the northern edge of NE Sunset Boulevard.
State law requires the Council to hold at least two public hearings to consider future zoning for
the subject site if it decides to accept the annexation and rezone it consistent with the City's
Comprehensive Plan. The first of these public hearings was held on November 20, 2006. At that
time, the Administration recommended R-4 zoning, consistent with the Comprehensive Plan Land
Use Map designation. If Comprehensive Plan Amendments are adopted later this year permitting
the Residential Manufactured Homes (RMH) zone in the Residential Low Density(RLD) land
use designation, six acres, currently occupied by a mobile home park, could be rezoned RMH at a
later date. The Council is also being asked to accept and approve this annexation by adopting the
effectuation ordinance and concurrently rezoning the non-street portions of the site R-4.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
itlisoi
Set June 18, 2007, for a public hearing to consider effectuating the Aster Park Annexation and
concurrently rezoning the site R-4.
EDNSP/PAA/Annexations/Aster Park Annexation/agnbill/de
XPc
ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT,
'0, NEIGHBORHOODS, AND STRATEGIC
4:.,� cm
' PLANNING DEPARTMENT
MEMORANDUM
DATE: May 14, 2007
TO: Toni Nelson, Council President
Members of the Renton City Council
VIA: A'd Kathy Keolker, Mayor
FROM: Alex Pietsch, Administrator 0
STAFF CONTACT: Don Erickson, Senior Planner(x6581)
SUBJECT: Aster Park Annexation - Second Public Hearing on Zoning
and Effectuation of Annexation
ISSUE:
• Should the City Council effectuate the Aster Park Annexation now that the Boundary
Iiimo Review Board for King County(BRB) has completed their review and issued their
closing letter?
• If Council decides to effectuate this annexation, should Council concurrently rezone it
R-4 consistent with the current Residential Low Density(RLD) Comprehensive Plan
land use designations?
RECOMMENDATION:
The Administration recommends that Council:
• Adopt an ordinance effectuating the annexation of the 18.48-acre Aster Park
Annexation site west of 148th Avenue SE, north of the midpoint of SE 112th Street, if
extended, and generally south of the north side of NE Sunset Boulevard; and
• Adopt two ordinances concurrently rezoning the non-street portions of the annexation
site R-4, four units per net acre, consistent with the Comprehensive Plan RLD land
use designation.
BACKGROUND SUMMARY:
At its November 20, 2006, public meeting, Council accepted the 60% Direct Petition to
Annex for this annexation and considered future zoning for the non-street portions of this
'"fir' 18.48-acre site. Pursuant to State law, the City is required to hold two public hearings on
h:\ednsp\paa\annexations\aster park\final issue paper.doc
Toni Nelson,Council President
May 14, 2007
Page 2 of 2
IWO
future zoning. The BRB has reviewed and approved the annexation as submitted in the
Notice of Intent package. This second public hearing is being scheduled to allow Council
to effectuate this annexation by ordinance, if it so chooses. It is also being held to allow
Council to finalize its recommendations for future zoning, if it decides to effectuate this
annexation. Staff is recommending that the non-street portions of the 18.48-acre site be
zoned R-4, consistent with the RLD land use designation shown on the Comprehensive
Plan Land Use Map for this area. If new Comprehensive Plan Amendments are adopted
later this year allowing the Residential Manufactured Home (RMH) zone under the RLD
land use designation, the western six acres now occupied by a mobile home park, could
be rezoned to RMH. It is anticipated that as many as 20 additional single-family
detached dwelling units could be built on the existing mobile home park site if it were to
redevelop, and possibly five new single-family homes could develop on the remaining
1.6-acre portion of the 18.48-acre site.
Staff's fiscal analysis for this annexation indicated that upon annexation, there would a
slight surplus. However, at full development, based upon zoning potential, this would
increase to approximately $19,084 in today's dollars. Even though the City collects a
parks and recreation mitigation fee from new residential development, the anticipated
cost of developing new recreational facilities to accommodate the anticipated number of
new residents would exceed this amount by an estimated $29,000.
At the November 20, 2006, meeting, the Administration also requested authorization to
forward the Notice of Intent package to the BRB for their mandatory 45-day review. The '440
Board approved this annexation on April 4, 2007, finding it consistent with their
objectives and criteria.
CONCLUSION:
The proposed Aster Park Annexation has now been approved by the BRB. The City has
held the first of two required public hearings on zoning in November 2006 and will
hopefully hold the second on June 18, 2007, to further consider zoning and decide
whether to now effectuate this 18.48-acre annexation. City staff have reviewed this
annexation and voiced no objections or indicated major obstacles to providing services to
it. The Community Services Department indicated a deficiency in park space and
estimated a one-time parks acquisition and improvement cost of$29,000 to maintain the
City's citywide parks and recreation standards.
Based upon the above and the previously submitted analysis, staff concludes that the
proposed Aster Park Annexation would further the City's business goals, be consistent
with its Comprehensive Plan, and be in the general welfare and interest of the City.
h:\ednsp\paa\annexations\aster park\final issue paper.doc
4111 Washington State Boundary Review Board
For King County
Yesler Building, Room 402, 400 Yesler Way, Seattle, WA 98104
Phone: (206) 296-6800 • Fax: (206)296-6803 • http://www.metrokc.gov/annexations
April 3, 2007
City of Renton
Attn: Don Erickson, AICP
Senior Planner
1055 South Grady Way
Renton, WA 98055
RE: NOTIFICATION OF OFFICIAL FILING
File No. 2252 - City of Renton - Aster Park Annexation
Dear Mr. Erickson
We have received approval from King County engineering staff of the legal description for the
above-referenced Notice of Intention. The Notice of Intention is now considered complete and
has been officially filed effective: April 3, 2007. The forty-five day period allowed for
invoking the Board's jurisdiction and requesting a public hearing has passed. You will be
advised of any further changes in the status of the Notice before the Board.
Please be aware that any future final ordinance or resolution on the proposed action must
incorporate the legal description approved by King County engineering staff, including any
revisions made in response to the engineering staff review.
Sincerely,
41,4ad6L)Lenora Blauman
Executive Secretary
Atch: King County Road Services Division letter dated March 29, 2007
cc: City of Renton, Attn: Marty Wine, Assistant Chief of Administrative Services
Anne Noris, Clerk of the Council (w/o atch)
Lydia Reynolds-Jones, Manager, Project Support Services (w/o atch)
FORM 12
CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON
ORDINANCE NO.
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON
ANNEXING CERTAIN TERRITORY OF THE CITY OF RENTON
(ASTER PARK ANNEXATION; FILE NO. A-05-008)
WHEREAS, under the provisions of RCW 35A.14.120, as amended, a petition in writing
requesting that certain territory contiguous to the City of Renton, as described below, be annexed
to the City of Renton, was presented and filed with the City Clerk on or about September 14,
2006.
WHEREAS, prior to the filing and circulation of said petition for annexation to the City
of Renton, the petitioning owners notified the City Council of their intention to commence such
proceedings as provided by law, as more particularly specified in RCW 35A.14.120 and upon
public hearing thereon, it having been determined and the petitioning owners having agreed to '401
assume their fair share of the pre-existing outstanding indebtedness of the City of Renton as it
pertains to the territory petitioned to be annexed; and to accept that portion of the City's
Comprehensive Plan as it pertains to the territory including the applicable Zoning Code relating
thereto; and
WHEREAS, the King County Department of Assessments has examined and verified the
signatures on the petition for annexation on, or about, September 20, 2006 and determined that
the signatures represent a majority of the annexation area's assessed value (excluding streets), as
provided by law; and
*4400
1
ORDINANCE NO.
WHEREAS, the Economic Development, Neighborhoods and Strategic Planning
Department of the City of Renton having considered and recommended the annexing of said
property to the City of Renton; and
WHEREAS, the City Council fixed June 18, 2007, as the time and place for public
hearing in the City Council Chambers, City Hall, Renton, Washington, upon the petition and
notice thereof having been given as provided by law; and
WHEREAS, pursuant to said notices public hearings have been held at the time and
place specified in the notices, and the Council having considered all matters in connection with
the petition and further determined that all legal requirements and procedures of the law
applicable to the petition method for annexation have been met; and
WHEREAS, the King County Boundary Review Board having deemed the "Notice of
Intention" approved as of April 4, 2007; and
WHEREAS, the City of Renton is concurrently zoning the annexation site R-4, four
units per net acre;
NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RENTON,
WASHINGTON, DOES ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS:
SECTION I. The findings, recitals, and determinations are hereby found to be
true and correct in all respects. All requirements of the law in regard to the annexation by
petition method, including the provisions of RCW 35A.14.120, 130, 140, and 150 have been
met. It is further determined that the petition for annexation to the City of Renton of the property
and territory described below is hereby approved and granted; the following described property
being contiguous to the City limits of the City of Renton is hereby annexed to the City of
2
ORDINANCE NO.
*4110
Renton, and such annexation to be effective on and after the approval, passage, and publication
of this Ordinance; and on and after said date the property shall constitute a part of the City of
Renton and shall be subject to all its laws and ordinances then and thereafter in force and effect;
the property being described as follows:
See Exhibits "A" attached hereto and made a part hereof as if fully set forth
herein
[Said property, approximately 19.85-acres, is generally located immediately south
of NE Sunset Boulevard and immediately west of 148 Avenue SE.]
and the owners of the property within the annexation shall assume their fair share of the
outstanding indebtedness of the City of Renton as prescribed in RCW 35A.14.120 as it pertains
to the property, and the property shall be subject to the City's Comprehensive Plan and Zoning
Code.
SECTION II. This Ordinance shall be effective upon its passage, approval, and
thirty days after its publication.
A certified copy of this Ordinance shall be filed with the King County Council, State of
Washington, and as otherwise provided by law.
PASSED BY THE CITY COUNCIL this day of , 2007.
Bonnie I. Walton, City Clerk
APPROVED BY THE MAYOR this day of , 2007.
Kathy Keolker, Mayor
3
ORDINANCE NO.
Approved as to form:
Lawrence J. Warren, City Attorney
Date of Publication:
ORD.+:+:ma.
4
� ter - '� � ��j ----
I / — j' \ \ -
r 1
ila Ili In• ___liii ___
4111111111PP/ 71 _
7_,\
_ )__
\ a
— 4 -
- - \k ,
111: Mg
p
_k 14111 ip
_______ _ _„p
ride
I ii
L_ A EN i /,‘, , \\
moll
Nall'
Iiiimionsigri _ ' \ , _
Ili 1 \_,,,,_____,\A__
,11
II
se _ _,
This document Is a graphic representation,not guaranteed
to survey acwrocy,Ntended for city ppurposes=need I iiiiia based an the best Information ovaflabls ae of the date shown.
This map Is for display purposes only.
Aster Park Annexation 0 300 60
Exhibit A
1 : 3600
Gti�9� Economic Development,Neighborhoods& Strategic Planning l I Annexation Area
♦('e )+ Alex Pietsch,Administrator —
�,\ V� cE Feasel — Renton City Limits
INTO 17 May 2007
loare
CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON
ORDINANCE NO.
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON
ESTABLISHING THE ZONING CLASSIFICATION OF CERTAIN
PROPERTY ANNEXED WITHIN THE CITY OF RENTON FROM R-48
(URBAN RESIDENTIAL 48 DU PER ACRE, KING COUNTY ZONING)
TO R-4 (RESIDENTIAL 4 DU/AC; FOUR DWELLING UNITS PER
ACRE)
(ASTER PARK ANNEXATION, FILE NO. A-05-008).
WHEREAS, under Section 4.2.020 of Chapter 2, Land Use Districts, of Title IV
(Development Regulations) of Ordinance No. 4260 entitled "Code of General Ordinances of the
City of Renton, Washington," as amended, and the maps and reports adopted in conjunction
therewith, the property hereinbelow described has not been zoned in the City of Renton; and
WHEREAS, said property owners petitioned the City of Renton for annexation and
` or concurrent rezoning, which said annexation having previously been approved and the property
annexed to the City of Renton, and the City having held two public hearings to consider this
zoning application, the first hearing being held on November 20, 2006, and the second hearing
being held on June 18, 2007, and said zoning request being in conformity with the City's
Comprehensive Plan, as amended, and the City Council having duly considered all matters
relevant thereto, and all parties having been heard appearing in support thereof or in opposition
thereto;
NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RENTON,
WASHINGTON, DOES ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS:
SECTION I. The following described property in the City of Renton is hereby
zoned to R-4 as hereinbelow specified. The annual ordinance adopting the maps of the City's
1
t
ORDINANCE NO. ,400
zoning ordinance is hereby amended to evidence said rezoning and the EDNSP Administrator is
hereby authorized and directed to change the maps of the zoning ordinance, as amended, to
evidence said rezoning, to wit:
See Exhibits "A" attached hereto and made a part hereof as if fully set forth
herein.
[Said property, approximately 6.0-acres, is generally located immediately south of
the south side of NE Sunset Boulevard on the north, west of the new Aster Park
Subdivision, and north of the midpoint of SE 112th Street, if extended, on the south.]
SECTION II. This ordinance shall be effective upon its passage,
approval, and thirty days after its publication.
PASSED BY THE CITY COUNCIL this day of , 2007.
Bonnie I. Walton, City Clerk
APPROVED BY THE MAYOR this day of , 2007.
Kathy Keolker, Mayor
Approved as to form:
Lawrence J. Warren, City Attorney
Date of Publication:
'err#
2
"ai c ffi _ 1 __ -- -x\"\-:___ 174_ j• T :4
______ _, ,,\,, , , ,
,„,„ \ , ,
/ , ,
/ ,/ /„,_ __ , ,
t _,.___,
111 tit , ,,,,,
tilt' , ,
....„,
„,,
N I
..
pi ,avi
_ ______, ,1",,,, _ '
gili ;
.__,
\ v
//
///,
/ /
__ N ,
,_ _ __ ,0 \ \
' livi'c3 .) 77-111.1.11.11,,A
_ , _ _
______
isrO
,,,, ,..,! _ ,, . , : , ,., ,„ ,.„, \ __
,,, . , .„. ,,, ', , . : ,„,,,-,, ,
T
Imo /\\ \ in
C 1 - -
11 3,t
_ ___ ,__
__________„
c_a_
01 \
\ , ----,1__
, ,
..........___,
, ,
__ , __ , _,
IIII _ \\\\ -
— This document is a graphic representation,not guaranteed
Iii 11 _____L_ _±..,_
to eurwy accuracy,intended for city ppurposes only and
I - based on the beet information s only.ie os of the date shown.
This map is for display purposes only.
meter Park Annexation 0 300 600
Exhibit A- R-48 to R-4 1 : 3600
ln)
1 I R-48 to R-4
TY Economic Development,Neighborhoods&Strategic Planning
'v\ °.� P g p Annexation Area
), Alex Pietsch.Administrator — — Renton City Limits
+ C E.Feasel
�L'N7t0 17 May 2007
a
Nomad
CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON
ORDINANCE NO.
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON
ESTABLISHING THE ZONING CLASSIFICATION OF CERTAIN
PROPERTY ANNEXED WITHIN THE CITY OF RENTON FROM R-4
(URBAN RESIDENTIAL 4 DU PER ACRE, KING COUNTY ZONING) TO
R-4 (RESIDENTIAL 4 DU/AC; FOUR DWELLING UNITS PER ACRE)
(ASTER PARK ANNEXATION, FILE NO. A-05-008).
WHEREAS, under Section 4.2.020 of Chapter 2, Land Use Districts, of Title IV
(Development Regulations) of Ordinance No. 4260 entitled "Code of General Ordinances of the
City of Renton, Washington," as amended, and the maps and reports adopted in conjunction
therewith, the property hereinbelow described has not been zoned in the City of Renton; and
WHEREAS, said property owners petitioned the City of Renton for annexation and
concurrent rezoning, which said annexation having previously been approved and the property ,
IS
annexed to the City of Renton, and the City having held two public hearings to consider this
zoning application, the first hearing being held on November 20, 2006, and the second hearing
being held on June 18, 2007, and said zoning request being in conformity with the City's
Comprehensive Plan, as amended, and the City Council having duly considered all matters
relevant thereto, and all parties having been heard appearing in support thereof or in opposition
thereto;
NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RENTON,
WASHINGTON, DOES ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS:
SECTION I. The following described property in the City of Renton is hereby
zoned to R-4 as hereinbelow specified. The annual ordinance adopting the maps of the City's
zoning ordinance is hereby amended to evidence said rezoning and the EDNSP Administrator is 41.10
1
ORDINANCE NO.
+tore
hereby authorized and directed to change the maps of the zoning ordinance, as amended, to
evidence said rezoning, to wit:
See Exhibits "A" attached hereto and made a part hereof as if fully set forth
herein.
[Said property, approximately 12.17-acres, is generally located immediately south of
the south side of NE Sunset Boulevard on the north, west of the west side of 148th
Avenue SE, and north of the midpoint of SE 112th Street, if extended, on the south.]
SECTION II. This ordinance shall be effective upon its passage,
approval, and thirty days after its publication.
PASSED BY THE CITY COUNCIL this day of , 2007.
''w+" Bonnie I. Walton, City Clerk
APPROVED BY THE MAYOR this day of , 2007.
Kathy Keolker, Mayor
Approved as to form:
Lawrence J. Warren, City Attorney
Date of Publication:
ORD.+:+:ch.
2
10,51,
i
__,_ ,--/ 11Rim
I
Fill" LI—[
\4. LLJ!U?WI
in III
1141 II
. /
// 1,1
141 Mil T\ al
c._)e j , \
„i „6;,,,,,- '—'-----11.1.1i1----- -
is/ 4$, — §iii :.
-- iv 0
, ,,,4;,,,,,„,,,woi,R
l ax ,,.„„
�
•4t {t ilii) aYR _
*.,, 111 , ,„ 1, ; .f, , ,,,1 ,I
4,':�, fl '6 j,
�`r 'i S :N;1,:::1*.,, , s E;
.
_����y��, S{
�"td"ga t i
t
111
VI liall
) , III
— (_0—
■
1111111111.1111111111.111111114.
F
411
1
IAster Park Annexation 0 300 60
Exhibit A— R-4 to R-4
I-"-1 R-4 to R-4 1 : 3600
c,,01,, Economic Development,Neighborhoods&Strategic Planning p Annexation Area
=�� * AlexFeaselh,Administratorit' — — Renton City Limits
�NToa 17 May 2007
CITY OF RENTON COUNCIL AGENDA BILL
AI#: ]p ,
Submitting Data: For Agenda of: 6/4/2007
Dept/Div/Board.. EDNSP
Staff Contact Mark Santos-Johnson Agenda Status
Ext. 6584 Consent X
Subject: Public Hearing..
Revised Multi-Family Housing Property Tax Exemption Correspondence..
Agreement—The Sanctuary Ordinance
Resolution
Old Business
Exhibits: New Business
Issue Paper Study Sessions
Ownership Change Letter Information
Agreement
Recommended Action: Approvals:
Council Concur Legal Dept
Finance Dept
Other
Fiscal Impact:
Expenditure Required... N/A Transfer/Amendment N/A
Amount Budgeted N/A Revenue Generated N/A
Total Project Budget N/A City Share Total ProjectN/A
SUMMARY OF ACTION:
In November 2006, the City received a Multi-Family Housing Property Tax Exemption ("Exemption")
application for The Sanctuary in the South Lake Washington designated residential targeted area. The
Sanctuary is the first phase of Fairfield Residential's mixed-use residential development at The Landing.
On January 22, 2007, the City Council approved an Exemption Agreement for The Sanctuary and
authorized the Mayor and City Clerk to execute the agreement. In March 2007, the original
applicant/owner transferred the property to a new related legal entity before the Exemption Agreement
was executed. The Exemption Agreement has been revised to reflect the new ownership entity, subject
to Council approval.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
Approve a revised Multi-Family Housing Property Tax Exemption Agreement that reflects the new
ownership entity for The Sanctuary project and authorize the Mayor and City Clerk to execute said
agreement in substantially the same form.
Nimore �r“ O ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT, NEIGHBORHOODS,
AND STRATEGIC PLANNING DEPARTMENT
frD�N�o� MEMORANDUM
DATE: May 25, 2007
TO: Toni Nelson, Council President
Members of the Renton City Council
VIA: J Mayor Kathy Keolker
FROM: Alex Pietsch, Administrator
STAFF CONTACT: Mark Santos-Johnson, Economic Development Specialist
ext. 6584
SUBJECT: Revised Multi-Family Housing Property Tax Exemption
Revised Agreement—The Sanctuary
ISSUE:
Ise In November 2006, the City received a Multi-Family Housing Property Tax Exemption
("Exemption") application for The Sanctuary in the South Lake Washington designated residential
targeted area. The Sanctuary is the first phase of Fairfield Residential's mixed-use residential
development at The Landing. On January 22, 2007, the City Council approved an Exemption
Agreement for The Sanctuary and authorized the Mayor and City Clerk to execute the agreement.
In March 2007, the original applicant/owner transferred the property to a new related legal entity
before the Exemption Agreement was executed. The Exemption Agreement has been revised to
reflect the new ownership entity, subject to Council approval.
RECOMMENDATION:
EDNSP recommends that the Council: (1) approve a revised Exemption Agreement that reflects
the new ownership entity for The Sanctuary; and (2) authorize the Mayor and City Clerk to execute
said agreement in substantially the same form. There are no other changes in the Exemption
Agreement.
BACKGROUND SUMMARY:
The City received an Exemption application for The Sanctuary on November 7, 2006. The
Sanctuary is a mixed-use residential rental project located near the intersection of North 10th Street
and Park Avenue North at The Landing. The project has two six-story buildings (five stories over
two levels of structured parking), 440 apartment units, 455,666 sf of residential space, 24,249 sf of
*or non-residential space (including 16,453 sf of retail space and 7,796 sf of clubhouse space), and 765
parking spaces in 240,886 sf of below grade and first-level structured parking.
h:\ednsp\council\issue papers-agenda bills-ctte reports\2007\issuepaper-mfhpte agreement-the sanctuary 5-25-07.doc
Revised Multi-Family Housing Property Tax Exemption Page 2 of 2
Agreement—The Sanctuary
May 25,2007
100
On January 22, 2007, the City Council approved an Exemption Agreement for The Sanctuary and
authorized the Mayor and City Clerk to execute the agreement. The Exemption Agreement
addresses the terms and conditions for The Sanctuary project to receive a partial property tax
exemption upon completion.
On March 19, 2007, Fairfield Lakeshore I L.P. (the original project applicant/owner) transferred
the property to Fairfield Sanctuary L.P. (the new project owner), a new related legal entity. The
transfer occurred as part of the project's efforts to secure construction financing for The Sanctuary
which, in part, resulted in the New York State Common Retirement Fund becoming an investor
and limited partner for the new ownership entity. The general partners of the original owner and
the new ownership entity are both Fairfield-owned entities.
As provided for in RMC 4-1-220F, the applicant must enter into an Exemption agreement
approved by the Council that addresses the terms and conditions for The Sanctuary project to
receive a partial property tax exemption upon completion. Since the property transfer to the new
related legal entity occurred before the Exemption Agreement was executed, the Exemption
Agreement has been revised to reflect the change in ownership to Fairfield Sanctuary L.P. There
are no other changes in the Exemption Agreement.
(Please see Attachment 1 for the May 24, 2007, letter from Fairfield regarding the ownership
change for The Sanctuary and Attachment 2 for the revised Exemption Agreement for The
Sanctuary.)
CONCLUSION:
The revised Multi-Family Housing Property Tax Exemption Agreement will allow the new
ownership entity to proceed as planned with the Exemption for The Sanctuary. The project will
provide an additional 440 apartment units in South Lake Washington and further the City's 2007-
2012 Business Plan Goals by continuing redevelopment efforts in South Lake Washington and
encouraging and partnering in the development of quality housing choices for people of all ages
and income levels.
Enc: Attachment 1 -May 25,2007,letter from Fairfield regarding the ownership change for The Sanctuary
Attachment 2—Revised Multi-Family Housing Property Tax Exemption Agreement for The Sanctuary
cc: Jay Covington,CAO
Bonnie Walton, City Clerk
Michael Bailey,Finance &IS Administrator
Gregg Zimmerman,P/B/PW Administrator
Neil Watts,Development Services Director
h:\ednsp\council\issue papers-agenda bills-ctte reports\2007\issuepaper-mfhpte agreement-the sanctuary 5-25-07.doc
Attachment 1
FAIRFIELD SANCTUARY L.P. Telephone(858) 457-2123
Facsimile (858) 457-3982
May 24, 2007
Mark Santos-Johnson
City of Renton
Economic Development Department
8th Floor City Hall
1055 S. Grady Way
Renton, WA 98055
Re: Sanctuary Apartments
Dear Mark:
In response to your recent email, please be advised as follows:
`ftwe The current owner of the Sanctuary Apartments property is Fairfield Sanctuary L.P. The general
partner of Fairfield Sanctuary L.P.is FF Sanctuary LLC and its limited partner is the New York
State Common Retirement Fund. The original owner was Fairfield Lakeshore I L.P. The general
partner of Fairfield Lakeshore I L.P. was FF Lakeshore I LLC and its limited partner was FF
Investments B LLC.The general partners of the original owner and the current owner are both
Fairfield owned entities.
The transfer of the property from Fairfield Lakeshore I LLC to Fairfield Sanctuary L.P. occurred
on March 19, 2007.
If you need anything further,please let us know.
Very truly yours,
FAIRFIELD SANCTUARY LLC
By: FF SANCTUARY LLC,its General Partner
By: ' .opt-i-s, Inc.,Its Manager
By: - \•`
Patrick J. G. '•
Vice President
5510 Morehouse Drive,Suite 200 • San Diego, California 92121
Attachment 2
MULTI-FAMILY HOUSING PROPERTY TAX EXEMPTION
AGREEMENT FOR THE SANCTUARY
THIS AGREEMENT is entered into this day of , 200
by and between FAIRFIELD SANCTUARY L.P. (hereinafter collectively referred to as
the "Applicant"), and the CITY OF RENTON, a municipal corporation (hereinafter
referred to as the "City").
Recitals.
1. Applicant has applied to the City for a limited property tax exemption as provided
for in Chapter 84.14 RCW and RMC 4-1-220 for multi-family housing residential
for-sale housing located in the Urban Center North District 1 (UC-N1) zone as
part of the South Lake Washington residential targeted area and the Economic
Development, Neighborhoods and Strategic Planning Department Administrator
has approved the application; and
2. Applicant has submitted to the City preliminary site plans, floor plans and
elevations for The Sanctuary with four hundred forty (440) new multi-family
housing units (hereinafter referred to as the "Project") on property situated near
the intersection of North 10th Street and Park Avenue North, Renton,
Washington, and more fully described in Exhibit A attached hereto, (hereinafter
referred to as the "Property"); and
3. Applicant is the owner of the Property; and
4. The City has determined that the Project will, if developed as proposed, satisfy
the requirements for a Final Certificate of Tax Exemption.
NOW, THEREFORE, the City and Applicant do mutually agree as follows:
1. Conditional Certificate of Acceptance of Tax Exemption
City agrees, upon execution of this Agreement following approval by the City
Council, to issue a Conditional Certificate of Acceptance of Tax Exemption, which
conditional certificate shall expire three (3) years from the date of approval of this
Agreement by the City Council, unless extended by the Administrator of the Economic
Development, Neighborhoods and Strategic Planning Department (or any other City
Multi-Family Housing Property Tax Exemption Agreement *1119
The Sanctuary- p. 1
*'ripe office, department or agency that shall succeed to its functions), or his or her designee,
(hereafter referred to as "Administrator") as provided in RMC 4-1-2201.
2. Agreement to Construct Multi-Family Housing.
a. Applicant agrees to construct the Project on the Property substantially as
described in the site plans, floor plans, and elevations on file with the City's Economic
Development, Neighborhoods and Strategic Planning Department or its functional
successor (hereafter referred to as "Department") as of the date of the City Council's
approval of this Agreement, subject to such modifications thereto as may be required to
comply with applicable codes and ordinances; provided, that in no event shall such
construction provide fewer than thirty (30) new multi-family housing dwelling units
designed for permanent residential occupancy.
b. Applicant agrees to construct the Project on the Property to comply with
all applicable zoning requirements, land use regulations, and building and housing code
requirements, including but not limited to the City's development regulations in Title IV
of the RMC and the City's applicable design standards and guidelines. The Applicant
further agrees that approval of this Agreement by the City Council, its execution by the
Mayor, or issuance of a Conditional Certificate of Acceptance of Tax Exemption by the
City pursuant to RMC 4-1-220F3 in no way constitutes approval of proposed
improvements on the Property with respect to applicable provisions of the City's
development regulations included in Title IV of the RMC or any other applicable
regulation or obligates the City to approve proposed improvements to the Property.
c. Applicant agrees that the Project will be completed within three years from
the date of approval of this Agreement by the Council, unless extended by the
Administrator for cause as provided in RMC 4-1-2201.
3. Requirements for Final Certificate of Tax Exemption.
Applicant may, upon completion of the Project and upon issuance by the City of
a temporary certificate of occupancy, or a permanent certificate of occupancy if no
temporary certificate is issued, request a Final Certificate of Tax Exemption. The
request shall be in writing directed to the Administrator and be accompanied by the
following:
a. A statement of expenditures made with respect to each multi-family
housing unit and the total expenditures made with respect to the entire Project and
Property;
Multi-Family Housing Property Tax Exemption Agreement
The Sanctuary- p. 2
460
b. A description of the completed work and a statement of qualification for
the multi-family housing property tax exemption;
c. A statement that the Project was completed within the required three-year
period or any authorized extension and documentation that the Project was completed
in compliance with the terms of this Agreement; and
d. Any such further information that the Administrator deems necessary or
useful to evaluate the Project's eligibility for the Final Certificate of Tax Exemption.
4. Agreement to Issue Final Certificate of Tax Exemption.
The City agrees to file a Final Certificate of Tax Exemption with the King County
Assessor within forty (40) days of submission by the Applicant of all materials required
by paragraph 3 above, if Applicant has:
a. Successfully completed the Project in accordance with the terms of this
Agreement and RMC 4-1-220;
b. Filed a request with the City for a Final Certificate of Tax Exemption with
the Administrator and submitted the materials described in Paragraph 3 above ;
c. Paid the City a fee in the amount of two hundred and fifty dollars ($250.00);
and
d. Met all other requirements provided in RMC 4-1-220 for issuance of the
Final Certificate of Tax Exemption.
5. Annual Certification.
Within thirty (30) days after the first anniversary of the date the City filed the
Final Certificate of Tax Exemption and each year thereafter for a period of ten (10)
years, Applicant agrees to file a certification or declaration with the Administrator,
verified upon oath or affirmation, with respect to the accuracy of the information
provided therein, containing the following:
a. A statement of the occupancy and vacancy of the multi-family housing
units during the previous year;
b. A certification that the multi-family housing units, Project and Property
have not changed use since the date of filing of the Final Certificate of Tax Exemption,
Multi-Family Housing Property Tax Exemption Agreement
The Sanctuary- p. 3
•
'rlrr'
c. A statement that the multi-family housing units, Project and Property
continue to be in compliance with this Agreement and the requirements of RMC 4-1-
220;
d. A description of any improvements or changes to the Project made after
the filing of the Final Certificate or the most recent certification; and
e. Any such further information that the Administrator deems necessary or
useful to evaluate eligibility for the Final Certificate of Tax Exemption.
6. No Violations for Duration of Exemption.
For the duration of the property tax exemption granted under RMC 4-1-220,
Applicant agrees that the Project and the Property will have no violations of applicable
zoning requirements, land use regulations, and building and housing code
requirements, including but not limited to the development regulations in Title IV of the
RMC, for which the Planning, Building and Public Works Department or its functional
successor shall have issued a notice of violation, citation or other notification that is not
resolved by a certificate of compliance, certificate of release, withdrawal or otherwise,
within the time period for compliance, if any, provided in such notice of violation, citation
or other notification or any extension of the time period for compliance granted by the
lkime Planning, Building and Public Works Department.
7. Notification of Transfer of Interest or Change in Use.
Applicant agrees to notify the Administrator within thirty (30) days of any transfer
of Applicant's ownership interest in the Project, the Property or any improvements made
to the Property. Applicant further agrees to notify the Administrator and the King
County Assessor within sixty (60) days of any change of use of any or all of the multi-
family housing units on the Property to another use. Applicant acknowledges that such
a change in use may result in cancellation of the property tax exemption and imposition
of additional taxes, interest and penalty pursuant to State law.
8. Cancellation of Exemption - Appeal.
a. The City reserves the right to cancel the Final Certificate of Tax
Exemption if at any time the multi-family housing units, the Project or the Property no
longer complies with the terms of this Agreement or with the requirements of RMC 4-1-
220, or for any other reason no longer qualifies for a property tax exemption.
Multi-Family Housing Property Tax Exemption Agreement
v,. The Sanctuary- p. 4
Neriv
b. If the property tax exemption is canceled for non-compliance, Applicant
acknowledges that state law requires that an additional real property tax is to be
imposed in the amount of: [a} the difference between the property tax paid and the
property tax that would have been paid if it had included the value of the nonqualifying
improvements, dated back to the date that the improvements became nonqualifying; [b]
a penalty of 20% of the difference calculated under paragraph (a) of this paragraph 8;
[c] interest at the statutory rate on delinquent property taxes and penalties, calculated
from the date the tax would have been due without penalty if the improvements had
been assessed without regard to the exemptions provided by Chapter 84.14 RCW and
RMC 4-1-220. Applicant acknowledges that, pursuant to RCW 84.14.110, any
additional tax owed, together with interest and penalty, become a lien on the Property
and attach at the time the Property or portion of the Property is removed from multi-
family housing use, and that the lien has priority to and must be fully paid and satisfied
before a recognizance, mortgage, judgment, debt, obligation, or responsibility to or with
which the Property may become charged or liable. Applicant further acknowledges that
RCW 84.14.110 provides that any such lien may be foreclosed in the manner provided
by law for foreclosure of liens for delinquent real property taxes.
c. Upon determining that a tax exemption is to be canceled, the
Administrator shall notify the property owner by certified mail, return receipt requested.
The property owner may appeal the determination in accordance with RMC 4-1-220L2.
9. Amendments.
No modification of this Agreement shall be made unless mutually agreed upon
by the parties in writing and unless in compliance with the provisions of RMC 4-1-220H,
including but not limited to the Applicant's payment of a two hundred and fifty dollars
($250.00) contract amendment fee.
10. Binding Effect.
The provisions, covenants, and conditions contained in this Agreement are
binding upon the parties hereto and their legal heirs, representatives, successors,
assigns, and subsidiaries.
11. Recording of Agreement.
The Administrator shall cause to be recorded at the Applicant's expense, or
require Applicant to record, in the real property records of the King County Department
of Records and Elections, this Agreement and any other documents as will identify such
Multi-Family Housing Property Tax Exemption Agreement
The Sanctuary- p. 5 4010
*"'r terms and conditions of eligibility for exemption as the Administrator deems appropriate
for recording.
12. Audits and Inspection of Records.
Applicant understands and agrees that the City has the right to audit or review
appropriate records to assure compliance with this Agreement and RMC 4-1-220 and to
perform evaluations of the effectiveness of the multi-family housing property tax
exemption program. Applicant agrees to make appropriate records available for review
or audit upon seven days' written notice by the City.
13. Notices.
All notices to be given pursuant to this Agreement shall be in writing and shall be
deemed given when hand-delivered within normal business hours, when actually received
by facsimile transmission, or two business days after having been mailed, postage
prepaid, to the parties hereto at the addresses set forth below, or to such other place as a
party may from time to time designate in writing.
APPLICANT:
Fairfield Sanctuary L.P.
19401 40th Avenue West
Nwe Suite 280
Lynnwood, WA 98036
Phone: 425-640-9242; Fax: 425-640-9240
Attention: Mark E. Faulkner
CITY: City of Renton
Economic Development, Neighborhoods and Strategic Planning
1055 South Grady Way
Renton, Washington 98055
Phone: (425) 430-6592 Fax: (425) 430-7300
Attention: Administrator
14. Severability.
In the event that any term or clause of this Agreement conflicts with applicable
law, such conflict shall not affect other terms of this Agreement which can be given
effect without the conflicting terms or clause, and to this end, the terms of the
Agreement are declared to be severable.
Multi-Family Housing Property Tax Exemption Agreement
Nitre The Sanctuary- p. 6
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this Agreement on the day
and year written above.
CITY OF RENTON
Kathy Keolker, Mayor
APPROVED AS TO FORM: ATTEST:
City Attorney Bonnie I. Walton, City Clerk
FAIRFIELD SANCTUARY L.P.
A Delaware Limited Partnership
By: FF SANCTUARY LLC, its General Partner
By: FF PROPERTIES, INC., Its Manager
By:
Mark E. Faulkner, Vice President
Multi-Family Housing Property Tax Exemption Agreement
The Sanctuary- p. 7 *110
'ow
STATE OF WASHINGTON )
) ss.
COUNTY OF KING )
On this day of , 200 , before the
undersigned, a Notary Public in and for the state of Washington, duly commissioned
and sworn, personally appeared before me Kathy Keolker, to me known to be the
Mayor of the City of Renton, the municipal corporation that executed the within and
foregoing instrument, and acknowledged said instrument to be the free and voluntary
act and deed of said municipal corporation for the uses and purposes therein
mentioned and on oath stated that she was authorized to execute said instrument.
In witness whereof I have hereunto set my hand and affixed my official seal the
day and year first above written.
NOTARY PUBLIC
Printed Name:
Residing at
My commission expires
Nie
[notary seal]
Multi-Family Housing Property Tax Exemption Agreement
*we The Sanctuary- p. 8
STATE OF WASHINGTON )
) ss.
COUNTY OF KING
On this day of , 200 , before the
undersigned, a Notary Public in and for the state of Washington, duly commissioned
and sworn, personally appeared before me Mark E. Faulkner, to me known to be the
Vice President of FF Properties, Inc., that executed the within and foregoing instrument
and acknowledged said instrument to be the free and voluntary act and deed of said
party, for the uses and purposes therein mentioned, and on oath stated that he was
authorized to execute said instrument.
In witness whereof I have hereunto set my hand and affixed my official seal the
day and year first above written.
NOTARY PUBLIC
Printed Name:
Residing at
My commission expires
IWO
[notary seal]
Multi-Family Housing Property Tax Exemption Agreement
The Sanctuary- p. 9
Orr MULTI-FAMILY HOUSING PROPERTY
TAX EXEMPTION AGREEMENT
EXHIBIT A
LEGAL DESCRIPTION
LOT 2 OF CITY OF RENTON LLA 06-004 LOT 2A SHORT SUBDIVISION,
RECORDED UNDER KING COUNTY RECORDING NO. 20060822900013.
SITUATE IN THE CITY OF RENTON, COUNTY OF KING, STATE OF WASHINGTON.
*.r
Multi-Family Housing Property Tax Exemption Agreement
%ow Exhibit A— Legal Description
The Sanctuary- p. i
4.
7
CITY OF RENTON COUNCIL AGENDA BILL
AI#:`7 14,_.
SUBMITTING DATA: FOR AGENDA OF: 06/04/07
Dept/Div....Human Resources & Risk Mgmt
Staff Contact Michael Webby(x-7650) AGENDA STATUS:
Consent X
SUBJECT: Public Hearing
Group Health Cooperative Medical Coverage Agreement Correspondence...
Annual renewal. Ordinance
Resolution
Old Business
EXHIBITS: New Business
Study Session
Contract Revisions Other
RECOMMENDED ACTION: I APPROVALS:
Legal Dept X
Refer to Finance Committee Finance Dept
Other X
kiimpoiSCAL IMPACT:
None Transfer/Amendment
Revenue Generated
SUMMARY OF ACTION:
Request approval for annual renewal of Group Health Contract No. 0057500 and Contract 4057500 for LEOFF
1 Retirees, and Contract No. 1162600 for all active employees. Funding has been previously approved by
Council in the 2007 Budget. The revisions are applicable to all three of the renewal contracts. As in prior years
Group Health does not send confirming contracts for signature until mid year. The City Attorney's Office has
reviewed and approved the 2007 contracts. Complete copies of the contract are available for review.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
Authorization for the Mayor and City Clerk to sign the annual Group Health Cooperative Medical contracts.
April 27, 2007
Ms. Terri Shuhart
Human Resources & Risk Management
CITY OF RENTON
1055 South Grady Way
Renton, Washington 98055
Re: Group Health Cooperative Agreements for 2007
Dear Terri:
Following is our review of the City of Renton's Group Medical Coverage Agreements
with Group Health Cooperative, effective January 1, 2007. These Agreements are for the
following group of employees: 1) All Active Employees, Policy No. 1162600; and 2)
Leoff I Retirees, Policy No. 0057500
Now
We have also reviewed the Contract Revisions from Group Health for the 2007 contracts.
We see changes have been made to keep up-to-date with the State's increase to the
Chemical Dependency provision. There is also an increase in the Organ Transplant
benefit to $250,000 from $200,000.
In addition, clarifications have been made to the contract language. Specifically, to
clarify the Preventive Care heading to indicate coverage for prostate cancer screening.
Other clarifications include Dependent Limiting Age provision, definition of
responsibility for Adoptive parent, and how charges relating to Organ Transplants are
allocated. They have also changed the language for Manipulative Therapy to refer to the
Schedule and have updated their language concerning Appeals.
We understand you received these contracts direct from Group Health. Before signing,
please take a moment for your own review and verification. After you have reviewed,
please sign each contract and extra signature page, retain the contracts for your files
and return the extra signature pages as indicated by Group Health.
Sincerely,
Pamela J. Arwood
lorme
Enclosures
GROUP HEALTH COOPERATIVE
CONTRACT REVISIONS
Effective January 1, 2007 '
44004
(Created 7/10/06)
This is the most current list of revisions, but this list is subject to change at any time.
CONTRACT
LANGUAGEBENEFIT CHANGE EXPLANATION
Allowances Schedule The benefit period allowance under
chemical dependency services has been
increased in accordance with Washington
state law.The dollar amount will be
reflected in the Agreement.
The organ transplant benefit has been
increased from a$200,000 lifetime
maximum to a$250,000 lifetime benefit
maximum(including organ acquisition,
matching and donor costs up to$50,000),
and the benefit wait period has been
decreased from twelve(12)months to six(6)
months.
The heading of Preventive Services has been
revised in accordance with Washington State
requirements to specify prostate cancer 41110
screening coverage.
Eligibility and Enrollment A clarification has been made to include the
dependent limiting age provision with the
dependent children eligibility provision.
A clarification has also been made to
address the Office of Insurance
Commissioner's concern regarding adoptive
children placed with the Subscriber for the
purpose of adoption.The language has been
revised to reflect that the Subscriber assumes
total or partial financial support of the child,
rather than assuming financial responsibility
for the medical expenses of the child.
Organ Transplants The organ transplant benefit has been
changed to reflect organ acquisition,
matching and donor costs applying to the
lifetime maximum,as well as reducing the
benefit wait period from twelve(12)months
to six(6)months.
GHC(7/10/06) 1
Manipulative therapy A clarification has been made to reference
the Allowances Schedule rather than the
iitury
specific benefit limit(which is already
addressed in the Allowances Schedule).
Appeals A clarification has been made to address the
Office of Insurance Commissioner's concern
regarding the optional appeals step by a
GHC appeals committee and ERISA
requirements for expedited appeals.
Definitions The definition of Lifetime Maximum has
been clarified to state that it applies to this
Agreement or in combination with any other
medical coverage agreement between GHC
and the Group.
GHC(7/10/06) 2
CITY OF RENTON COUNCIL AGENDA BILL
AI#: N ,
„r Submitting Data: Planning/Building/Public Works For Agenda of:
Dept/Div/Board.. Transportation Systems June 4, 2007
Staff Contact Peter Hahn, Deputy PBPW Agenda Status
Administrator - Transportation
(x7242) Consent X
Subject: Public Hearing..
Correspondence..
Agreement with Washington State Department of Ordinance
Transportation(WSDOT) for a City of Renton Project Resolution X
Coordinator Old Business
Exhibits: New Business X
Issue Paper Study Sessions
Agreement Information
Resolution (forthcoming)
Recommended Action: Approvals:
Legal Dept X
Refer to Transportation/Aviation Committee Finance Dept X
Other
Fiscal Impact:
Expenditure Required... $0 Transfer/Amendment $ 0
Amount Budgeted $0 Revenue Generated $43,300
iiise Total Project Budget $0 City Share Total Project.. $ 0
SUMMARY OF ACTION:
The I-405, I-5 to SR 169 Stage I - Widening Project will build an additional lane on I-405 in each
direction between SR 167 and I-5, including the complete replacement of the 1-405 structures over
Oakesdale Avenue SW, Springbrook Creek, and the Springbrook Trail. The project will also build
an additional southbound lane on SR 167 between I-405 and SW 41' Street.
It is of mutual benefit to both the City and WSDOT to direct all communication related to aspects
of this project through a City Project Coordinator. This agreement enables WSDOT to fund that
portion of the City Project Coordinator position that is directly related to services rendered solely
for this project.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
Authorize the Mayor and City Clerk to execute the GCA cooperative agreement with the
Washington State Department of Transportation for the City of Renton Project Coordinator for
the I-405, I-5 to SR 169 Stage I-Widening Project.
H:\File Sys\TRP-Transportation Planning&Programming\TRP-10-Transportation Planning Projects\WSDOT I-405\MOUS and MOAs\June 2007 Agreement(City Project
Coordinator)\I-405 Project Coordinator Agenda Bill.doc
vow' UtiY 0 PLANNING/BUILDING/
• ® , PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT
MEMORANDUM
DATE: June 4, 2007
TO: Toni Nelson, Council President
Members of the Renton City Council
VIA: -- ,Kathy Keolker, Mayor
FROM: 4� Gregg Zimmermandknistrator
STAFF CONTACT: Peter Hahn, Deputy PBPW Administrator—Transportation
(x7242)
SUBJECT: Agreement with Washington State Department of
Transportation (WSDOT) for a City of Renton Project
Coordinator
ISSUE:
`4rr
Should the Mayor enter into a GCA cooperative agreement with the Washington State
Department of Transportation(WSDOT) for a City of Renton Project Coordinator for the
I-405, I-5 to SR 169 Stage I—Widening Project?
RECOMMENDATION:
Authorize the Mayor and City Clerk to execute the GCA cooperative agreement with the
Washington State Department of Transportation for the City of Renton Project
Coordinator for the I-405, I-5 to SR 169 Stage I—Widening Project.
BACKGROUND:
The 1-405, I-5 to SR 169 Stage I—Widening Project will build an additional lane on
1-405 in each direction between SR 167 and I-5, including the complete replacement of
the 1-405 structures over Oakesdale Avenue SW, Springbrook Creek, and the
Springbrook Trail. The project will also build an additional southbound lane on SR 167
between 1-405 and SW 41st Street. WSDOT intends to execute this project using the
design-build method of project delivery.
WSDOT and the City executed a Memorandum of Understanding in September 2004 that
*law described how the two would cooperate during the design and construction of I-405
Toni Nelson,Council President
Members of the Renton City Council
Page 2 of 2
June 4,2007
`rlr4
projects. Also, in March 2007, WSDOT and the City executed a cooperative agreement
that further defined both WSDOT and City roles and responsibilities related to design and
construction of this project.
It is of mutual benefit to both the City and WSDOT to direct all communication related to
aspects of this project through a City Project Coordinator. This agreement enables
WSDOT to fund that portion of the City Project Coordinator position that is directly
related to services rendered solely for this project.
Attachment: WSDOT GCA Agreement
cc: Peter Hahn,Deputy PBPW Administrator—Transportation
Jim Seitz,Transportation Planning&Programming Supervisor
Keith Woolley,Transportation Planning and Programming
Connie Brundage,Transportation Administrative Secretary
voilt
h:\file sys\trp-transportation planning&programming\trp-I0-transportation planning projects\wsdot i-405\mous and moas\june
2007 agreement(city project coordinator)\i-405 project coordinator issue paper.doc
FOR INTERNAL REVIEW AND DISCUSSION ONLY
1 GCA-XXXX
*awe 2
3 Washington State Department of Transportation
4 and the City of Renton
5
6 COOPERATIVE AGREEMENT
7 For the City of Renton Project Coordinator
8 For the I-405/1-5 TO SR 169 STAGE 1 —WIDENING PROJECT
9
10
11 This Cooperative Agreement for the City of Renton Project Coordinator for the I-405/I-5
12 to SR 169 Stage 1 —Widening Project (the "AGREEMENT"), is made and entered into by the
13 CITY OF RENTON (the "CITY"), a municipal corporation, and the STATE OF
14 WASHINGTON, DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION (the "STATE"), collectively
15 referred to as the "PARTIES" and individually referred to as "PARTY."
16
17 WHEREAS, the STATE, in the interest of providing congestion relief in the I-405
18 Corridor, proposes improvements along I-405 and SR 167 within the CITY in a project known as
19 the I-405/I-5 to SR 169 Stage 1 — Widening Project (the "PROJECT"); and
20
21 WHEREAS, the PARTIES have entered into GCA-5097, "Cooperative Agreement for
22 Design and Construction of the I-405/1-5 to SR 169 Stage 1 —Widening Project," wherein the
23 PARTIES define their roles and responsibilities related to design and construction of the
New 24 PROJECT; and
25
26 WHEREAS, the PARTIES believe it is of mutual benefit to direct all communication
27 related to aspects of the PROJECT through a CITY Project Coordinator; and
28
29 WHEREAS,pursuant to the terms of agreement GCA-5097, the STATE has committed
30 to funding that portion of the CITY Project Coordinator position that is directly related to
31 services rendered solely for the PROJECT; and
32
33 WHEREAS, each of the PARTIES is authorized to enter into this AGREEMENT under
34 Revised Code of Washington(RCW) 39.34.080, which authorizes a public agency to contract
35 with another public agency to perform any governmental service that each public agency is
36 authorized to perform; and
37
38 NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the terms, conditions, covenants, and
39 performances contained herein, IT IS MUTUALLY AGREED AS FOLLOWS:
40
41 1.0 GENERAL
42
43 1.1 The STATE and the CITY agree that it is to the benefit of both PARTIES for the STATE
44 to fund the new, temporary position of CITY Project Coordinator, in order to facilitate
45 communication and coordination between the PROJECT and the CITY.
4040.46
GCA-XXXX Page 1 of 7 5/25/2007
COOPERATIVE AGREEMENT for the City of Renton Project Coordinator for the 1-405/1-5 TO SR 169 STAGE 1—WIDENING PROJECT
FOR INTERNAL REVIEW AND DISCUSSION ONLY
47 1.2 The CITY Project Coordinator will serve as the CITY's PROJECT liaison and will be
48 responsible for facilitating communication between the PROJECT and CITY staff as well *000
49 as expediting CITY review of all PROJECT-related submittals.
50
51 1.3 The individual serving in the capacity of CITY Project Coordinator shall be a Civil
52 Engineer III or greater.
53
54 1.4 The CITY shall consult with the STATE on its choice of the individual chosen to serve as
55 the CITY Project Coordinator. The STATE shall have the authority to reject the
56 individual the CITY has chosen to fill the CITY Project Coordinator position.
57
58 1.5 The CITY may not change the individual serving in the capacity of CITY Project
59 Coordinator at any time without written authorization of the STATE.
60
61 1.6 The CITY Project Coordinator shall consult with the STATE's 1-405 Project Engineer,
62 on a basis to be mutually agreed upon by the 1-405 Project Engineer and the CITY, for
63 the purpose of PROJECT activity and priority direction.
64
65 1.7 The STATE shall only fund those hours worked by the CITY Project Coordinator for
66 activities directly related to the PROJECT.
67
68 1.8 The PARTIES agree that the STATE shall pay an all inclusive flat-rate for work by the
69 CITY Project Coordinator, as outlined in Section 6.0.
70 .1400
71 1.9 The CITY may require the CITY Project Coordinator to work in excess of 40 hours per
72 week. Hours in excess of 40 hours shall be paid pursuant to the CITY union agreement.
73 The quarter hours, up to and including the 40th hour worked in a week shall be billed to
74 the STATE at the CITY Project Coordinator's standard hourly rate and not at an overtime
75 rate, if applicable to the employee serving as CITY Project Coordinator.
76
77 1.10 In the event the CITY Project Coordinator is absent, the CITY will assign a designee to
78 act in the stead of the CITY Project Coordinator. The CITY's designee acting on behalf
79 of the CITY Project Coordinator shall serve no more than ten (10) consecutive business
80 days without STATE approval. If the CITY Project Coordinator is absent for more than
81 ten (10) consecutive business days, the CITY shall name a replacement, temporary or
82 otherwise, subject to the terms and conditions outlined in Sections 1.3, 1.4, and 1,5.
83
84 1.11 If the STATE is unable to resolve to its satisfaction a dispute regarding the CITY Project
85 Coordinator, upon following the dispute resolution process specified in Section 7.0, the
86 STATE shall have the authority to request a replacement to fill the CITY Project
87 Coordinator position. The STATE's written request for replacement shall be submitted
88 to the CITY, and the CITY shall have thirty (30) calendar days to comply. The CITY
89 shall name a replacement CITY Project Coordinator subject to the terms and conditions
90 outlined in Sections 1.3 and 1.4.
91
92 2.0 CITY RESPONSIBILITIES
GCA-XXXX Page 2 of 7 5/25/2007 •
COOPERATIVE AGREEMENT for the City of Renton Project Coordinator for the 1-405/1-5 TO SR 169 STAGE 1—WIDENING PROJECT
FOR INTERNAL REVIEW AND DISCUSSION ONLY
93
44410,94 2.1 The CITY agrees to pay the CITY Project Coordinator and administer all employee
95 benefits in the same manner as all other CITY employees.
96
97 2.2 The CITY agrees that the CITY Project Coordinator shall be required to submit a
98 monthly activity report to the STATE of actual hours worked performing the tasks listed
99 in Section 4.0. The activity report shall include a daily accounting of specific activities
100 performed and specific hours worked to accomplish the tasks. The STATE will review
101 the hours worked and, if accurate, will approve reimbursement to the CITY at the
102 mutually agreed upon rate identified in Section 6.0.
103
104 2.3 The CITY Project Coordinator agrees to direct all communications related to specific
105 aspects of the PROJECT through the STATE's I-405 Project Engineer or his/her
106 designee.
107
108 3.0 STATE RESPONSIBILITIES
109
110 3.1 The STATE agrees to direct all communication related to the PROJECT through the
111 CITY Project Coordinator.
112
113 4.0 SCOPE OF WORK
114
115 4.1 The CITY Project Coordinator shall serve as a liaison between the STATE's I-405
16 Project Engineer and CITY staff.
117
118 4.2 The CITY Project Coordinator shall represent the CITY in design-build task force
119 meetings and ongoing informal reviews as design is being developed. The CITY Project
120 Coordinator shall be responsible for informing the appropriate CITY staff of discussions
121 and decisions made at task force meetings.
122
123 4.3 The CITY Project Coordinator shall circulate PROJECT submittals to appropriate CITY
124 staff and ensure timely CITY review. The CITY Project Coordinator shall be responsible
125 for expediting those reviews with the goal of limiting the CITY review of PROJECT. as
126 agreed to in Section 3.0 of GCA-5097.
127
128 5.0 SUPERVISION AND INDEPENDENT CAPACITY
129
130 5.1 The CITY Project Coordinator engaged in the performance of this AGREEMENT shall
131 continue to be an employee of the CITY and shall not be considered, for any purpose, to
132 be an employee of the STATE.
133
134 5.2 The CITY shall be responsible for the supervision of the CITY Project Coordinator.
135
136 6.0 PAYMENT
137
GCA-XXXX Page 3 of 7 5!25!2007.
COOPERATIVE AGREEMENT for the City of Renton Project Coordinator for the 1-I05/I-5 TO SR 169 STAGE 1—WIDENING PROJECT
FOR INTERNAL REVIEW AND DISCUSSION ONLY
138 6.1 The STATE, in consideration of the faithful performance of work to be done by the CITY
139 Project Coordinator, agrees to pay the CITY an all-inclusive flat-rate, which includes all '
140 costs and benefits outlined in Section 6.2, of a Civil Engineer III or higher to be billed in
141 fifteen (15) minute increments, for all hours worked to perform the specific tasks listed in
142 Section 4.0. The per hour rate shall serve as full compensation to the CITY for each hour
143 of work performed by the CITY Project Coordinator, up to a maximum of 800 hours.
144
145 6.2 The PARTIES agree that the flat-rate includes, but is not limited to, all costs associated
146 with administrative costs, travel expenses, overtime, as well as medical insurance,
147 retirement contributions, sick leave and vacation, and labor and industry payments.
148
149 6.3 The maximum amount payable by the STATE to the CITY under this AGREEMENT is
150 $43,300.
151
152 6.4 The CITY agrees to submit a monthly billing to the STATE summarizing the hours
153 worked each day by the CITY Project Coordinator. The monthly activity report listed in
154 Section 2.2 of this AGREEMENT shall be submitted as an attachment to the monthly
155 billing.
156
157 6.5 Upon receipt of the monthly billing and concurrence with the hours worked and the
158 accompanying activity report, the STATE agrees to reimburse the CITY within thirty
159 (30) calendar days of receipt of an approved invoice.
160
161 7.0 DISPUTE RESOLUTION
162
163 7.1 In the event that issues arise regarding the CITY Project Coordinator that are not
164 addressed in this AGREEMENT, the PARTIES agree to work quickly and
165 collaboratively to determine a resolution using the following guidelines.
166
167 7.1.1 Informal Resolution. The informal resolution process begins at the staff level and is
168 raised to higher organizational levels, if necessary. The levels of resolution are
169 described below.
170
171 7.1.1.1 The CITY's Project Coordinator and the STATE's I-405 Project Engineer shall
172 jointly cooperate to informally resolve any dispute as quickly and efficiently as
173 possible.
174
175 7.1.1.2 If unresolved, the CITY's Deputy Planning, Building, and Public Works
176 Administrator and the STATE's I-405 Construction Manager shall jointly
177 cooperate to informally resolve any dispute as quickly and efficiently as
178 possible.
179
180 7.1.2 Written Notice. If the dispute cannot be resolved at any of the levels described
181 above, the CITY's Planning, Building, and Public Works Administrator and the
182 STATE's I-405 Deputy Project Director shall notify each other in writing of any
GCA-XXXX Page 4 of 7 5/25/2007 : :
COOPERATIVE AGREEMENT for the City of Renton Project Coordinator for the 1-405/1-5 TO SR 169 STAGE 1—WIDENING PROJECT
FOR INTERNAL REVIEW AND DISCUSSION ONLY
1 83 dispute needing resolution.
+trrt84
185 7.2 Each PARTY agrees to compromise to the fullest extent possible in resolving the dispute
186 in order to avoid delays and minimize costs.
187
188 8.0 INDEMNIFICATION
189
190 8.1 Each PARTY shall protect, defend, indemnify, and save harmless the other PARTY, its
191 officers, officials, employees, and agents, while acting within the scope of their
192 employment as such, from any and all costs, claims,judgments, and/or awards of
193 damages (both to persons and/or property), arising out of, or in any way resulting from,
194 each of the PARTY's own acts or omissions. No PARTY will be required to indemnify,
195 defend, or save harmless the other PARTY if the claim, suit, or action for injuries, death,
196 or damages (both to persons and/or property) is caused by the sole negligence of the other
197 PARTY, its officers, officials, employees, and agents, while acting within the scope of
198 their employment as such. Where such claims, suits, or actions result from the
199 concurrent negligence of the PARTIES, the indemnity provided herein shall be valid and
200 enforceable only to the extent of a PARTY's own negligence.
201
202 8.2 The STATE and the CITY agree that their obligations under this Section extend to any
203 claim, demand, and/or cause of action brought by, or on behalf of, any of its employees
204 or agents. For this purpose, the PARTIES, by mutual negotiation, hereby waive, with
705 respect to the other PARTY only, any immunity that would otherwise be available
06 against such claims under the Industrial Insurance provisions of Title 51 RCW.
207
208 8.3 In the event either PARTY incurs any judgment, award, and/or cost arising herefrom,
209 including attorneys' fees, to enforce the provisions of this Section, all such fees,
210 expenses, and costs shall be recoverable from the other PARTY.
211
212 8.4 This indemnification and waiver shall survive the termination of this AGREEMENT.
213
214 9.0 AMENDMENT
215
216 9.1 This AGREEMENT may be extended upon mutual agreement of the PARTIES via a
217 supplement, if the CITY Project Coordinator position is deemed necessary beyond the
218 maximum number of hours outlined in Section 6.1.
219
220 9.2 Either PARTY may request modifications to this AGREEMENT. Such modifications
221 shall be mutually agreed upon by written amendments and/or supplements to this
222 AGREEMENT. No variation or alteration of the terms of this AGREEMENT shall be
223 valid unless made in writing and signed by authorized representatives of the PARTIES
224 hereto.
225
226 10.0 ALL WRITINGS CONTAINED HEREIN
727
°441x+'
GCA-XXXX Page 5 of 7 5/25/2007
COOPERATIVE AGREEMENT for the City of Renton Project Coordinator for the 1-405/1-5 TO SR 169 STAGE 1—WIDENING PROJECT
FOR INTERNAL REVIEW AND DISCUSSION ONLY
228 10.1 This AGREEMENT contains all the terms and conditions agreed upon by the PARTIES
229 to this AGREEMENT. No other understanding, oral or otherwise, regarding the subject *10,
230 matter of this AGREEMENT shall be deemed to exist or to bind any of the PARTIES
231 hereto.
232
233 11.0 GOVERNANCE
234
235 11.1 This AGREEMENT is entered into pursuant to, and under the authority granted by, the
236 laws of the State of Washington and applicable federal laws. The provisions of this
237 AGREEMENT shall be construed to conform to those laws.
238
239 12.0 EFFECTIVENESS AND DURATION
240
241 12.1 This AGREEMENT is effective upon execution by both PARTIES and will remain in
242 effect until completion of the PROJECT construction contract, or until GCA-5097 is
243 terminated pursuant to the termination clauses of that agreement, whichever occurs
244 earlier.
245
246 13.0 SEVERABILITY
247
248 13.1 If any provision of this AGREEMENT,or any provision of any document incorporated
249 by reference, shall be held invalid, such invalidity shall not affect the other provisions of
250 this AGREEMENT that can be given effect without the invalid provision, if such
251 remainder conforms to the requirements of applicable law and the fundamental purpose 'a1'
252 of this AGREEMENT, and to this end the provisions of this AGREEMENT are declared
253 to be severable.
254
255 14.0 TERMINATION
256
257 14.1 This AGREEMENT may be terminated by either PARTY upon thirty (30) calendar days
258 advanced written notice to the other PARTY.
259
260 15.0 VENUE
261
262 15.1 In the event that either PARTY deems it necessary to institute legal action or proceedings
263 to enforce any right or obligation under this AGREEMENT, the PARTIES hereto agree
264 that any such action or proceeding shall be brought in a court of competent jurisdiction
265 situated in Thurston County, Washington, and only after exhaustion of the dispute
266 resolution process outlined in Section 7.0 of this AGREEMENT.
267
268 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the PARTIES hereto have executed this AGREEMENT as of
269 the latest written date below:
270
271
272 CITY OF RENTON STATE OF WASHINGTON
273 DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
GCA-XXXX Page 6 of 7 5/25/2007-i
COOPERATIVE AGREEMENT for the City of Renton Project Coordinator for the 1-405/1-5 TO SR 169 STAGE 1—WIDENING PROJECT
FOR INTERNAL REVIEW AND DISCUSSION ONLY
'74
4140t75
74
wc`75
276
277 By: By:
278 Kathy Keolker Kim Henry
279 Mayor I-405 Project Director
280 City of Renton
281
282
283 Date: Date:
284
285
286 APPROVED AS TO FORM: APPROVED AS TO FORM:
287
288
289
290 By (print): By(print):
291
292
293
294 Signature: Signature:
295 CITY Attorney Assistant Attorney General
'96 Office of the Attorney General
X97
298
299 Date: Date:
Now
GCA-XXXX Page 7 of 7 5/25/2007'-} i
COOPERATIVE AGREEMENT for the City of Renton Project Coordinator for the 1-405/1-5 TO SR 169 STAGE I—WIDENING PROJECT
rM
CITY OF RENTON COUNCIL AGENDA BILL
AI #: !1''!
Submitting Data: Planning/Building/Public Works For Agenda of: June 4, 2007
Dept/Div/Board.. Utility Systems Division/Surface
Water Utility
Staff Contact Ron Straka(ext. 7248) Agenda Status:
Allen Quynn(ext. 7247) Consent X
Subject: Public Hearing..
SW 34th Street Culvert Replacement Project—Budget Correspondence..
Transfer Request Ordinance
Resolution X
Old Business
Exhibits: New Business
Issue Paper Study Sessions
Draft Ordinance Information
Recommended Action: Approvals:
Refer to Utilities Committee Legal Dept X
Finance Dept
Other
Fiscal Impact:
Expenditure Required... $150,000 Transfer/Amendment $150,000
Amount Budgeted $1,385,000 Revenue Generated
Total Project Budget $1,535,000 City Share Total Project..
SUMMARY OF ACTION:
The SW 34th Street Culvert Replacement project construction contract has been awarded to R.L. Alia
Company in the amount of$1,270,871. The approved Surface Water Utility 2007 CIP project budget is
$1,385,000. The Surface Water Utility recommends transferring $150,000 from the Lake Avenue
South/Rainier Avenue South Storm System Replacement project account
(427.000600.018.5960.0038.65.065430), to the SW 34th Street Culvert Replacement project account
(427.000600.018.5960.0038.65.065370). The funding for the Lake Avenue South/Rainier Avenue South
Storm System Replacement project is included in the approved Surface Water Utility's 2007 Capital
Improvement Program budget.
The transfer of$150,000 to the SW 34th Street Culvert Replacement Project budget account will result in
a revised budget of$1,535,000. The remaining funds of$264,129 after the final payment is made to the
contractor will be used for Surface Water Utility staff costs, inspection costs, utility relocation, and
contingency for additional materials, engineering, and potential change orders that may be needed during
construction.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
Approve the transfer of$150,000 from the Lake Avenue South/Rainier Avenue South Storm System
Replacement project account to the 2007 SW 34th Street Culvert Replacement project account.
H:\File Sys\SWP-Surface Water Projects\SWP-27-Surface Water Projects(CIP)\27-3223 SW 34th St Culvert Replacement
Project\Construction\Budget\transfer agenda bill.doc\AQtp
}
Y
0
C.) o PLANNINGBUILDING/
• ® • PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT
�. N�o� MEMOR ANDUM
DATE: May 24, 2007
TO: Toni Nelson, Council President
Members of the Renton City Council
VIA: )- Kathy Keolker, Mayor
FROM: Gregg Zimmermai6A inistrator
STAFF CONTACT: Ron Straka, Surface Water Utility Supervisor (ext. 7248)
Allen Quynn, Surface Water Utility Engineer (ext. 7247)
SUBJECT: Surface Water Utility Budget Transfer for the SW 34th
Street Culvert Replacement Project (CAG-07-027)
ISSUE:
%re Should the Council approve transferring $150,000 from the 2007 Lake Avenue
South /Rainier Avenue South Storm System Replacement project account to the 2007 SW
34th Street Culvert Replacement project account.
RECOMMENDATION:
Approve transferring $150,000 from the Lake Avenue South/Rainier Avenue South
project account to the SW 34th Street Culvert Replacement project account.
BACKGROUND SUMMARY:
The SW 34th Street Culvert Replacement project consists of replacing four undersized
72" diameter culverts that convey Springbrook Creek across SW 34th Street, in the
Renton valley, between Oakesdale Avenue SW and Lind Avenue SW. These culverts
were constructed in 1980 and are a major restriction in flows, contributing to the flooding
problems in the south valley during storm events, including portions of SW 34th Street,
Lind Avenue SW, and SW 39th Street. The replacement culvert will consist of a precast
30-feet wide by 12-feet high by 65-feet long box culvert designed to convey the 100-year
design storm.
The project construction contract has been awarded to R.L. Alia Company in the amount
of$1,270,871. The approved Surface Water Utility 2007 CIP project budget is
$1,385,000. The Surface Water Utility recommends transferring $150,000 from the Lake
Nose
Avenue South/Rainier Avenue South Storm System Replacement project account
Clawson/SW 34th Budget Transfer
May 24,2007
Page 2 of 2
(427.000600.018.5960.0038.65.065430), to the SW 34th Street Culvert Replacement
project account (427.000600.018.5960.0038.65.065370). The funding for the Lake voot
Avenue South/Rainier Avenue South Storm System Replacement project is included in
the approved Surface Water Utility's 2007 Capital Improvement Program budget.
The Lake Avenue South/Rainier Avenue South Storm System Replacement project
currently has an adjusted 2007 budget of$195,000. Due to other priorities, it is
anticipated that the start of design work on this project will be delayed until October or
November of this year. The remaining budget($45,000) after the transfer of$150,000
will cover the work that is to be accomplished on this project in 2007. The request for
re-appropriation of funding for the project design will be included in the proposed 2008
Surface Water Utility CIP budget.
Transferring $150,000 of funds to the 2007 SW 34th Street Culvert Replacement project
budget account will increase it to $1,535,000. Excluding the awarded contract amount of
$1,270,871, the remaining funds that currently exist in the project budget ($197,785) will
be used for Surface Water Utility staff costs, inspection costs, utility relocation, and
contingency for additional materials, engineering, and potential change orders that may
be needed during project construction.
CONCLUSION:
The Surface Water Utility recommends that Council approve transferring $150,000 to the
2007 SW 34th Street Culvert Replacement budget account.
vaiot
cc: Lys Hornsby, Utility Systems Director
File
*x111
H:\File Sys\SWP-Surface Water Projects\SWP-27-Surface Water Projects(CIP)\27-3223 SW 34th St Culvert Replacement
Project\Construction\Budget\Issue Paper-UtilCom doc\AQtp
Y•
DRAFT
*41.,v CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON Alpt
ORDINANCE NO.
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON,
AMENDING THE 2007 BUDGET BY TRANSFERRING $150,000 FROM
THE LAKE AVE. S. /RAINIER AVE. S. STORM SYSTEM
REPLACEMENT PROJECT EXPENDITURE ACCOUNT TO THE SW
34TH STREET CULVERT REPLACEMENT PROJECT EXPENDITURE
ACCOUNT.
NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF TI IF CITY OF RENTON,
WASHINGTON, DOES ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS:
SECTION I. Appropriations to the Surface Water Utility 2007 Capital
Improvement Program (CIP) expenditure account for the SW 340 Street Culvert Replacement
Project and the Lake Ave. S. /Rainier Ave. S. Storm System Replacement Project account are
hereby transferred as follows:
2007 2007
Original Budget Change Adjusted
Fund Budget Budget
(Expenditure Account)
SW 34`x' Street Culvert Replacement Project $1,385,000 + $150,000 $1.535.000
427.000600.018.5960.0038.65.065370 _
(Expenditure Account)
Lake Ave. S. /Rainier Ave. S. Storm System $195,000 - 5150.000 $45,000
Replacement Project
427.000600.018.5960.0038.65.065430
SECTION II. This ordinance shall become effective immediately upon its passage,
approval and five (5) days after publication.
PASSED BY THE CITY COUNCIL this day of . 2007.
1
,mom
•
ORDINANCE NO. bitlr 44 Pt
Bonnie I. Walton, City Clerk ,
APPROVED BY THE MAYOR this day of , 2007.
Kathy Keolker, Mayor
Approved as to form:
Lawrence J. Warren, City Attorney
Date of Publication:
,4210
2
CITY OF RENTON COUNCIL AGENDA BILL
AI#: / ;A
Submitting Data: For Agenda of: June 4, 2007
Dept/Div/Board.. PBPW/Utility System Division
Staff Contact Dave Christensen (ext. 7212) Agenda Status
Consent X
Subject: Public Hearing..
Interlocal Agreement between Renton and Water Correspondence..
District 90 for Transfer of Sewer Facilities to Renton Ordinance
Resolution
Old Business
Exhibits: New Business
Issue Paper Study Sessions
Interlocal Agreement Information
Resolution
Recommended Action: Approvals:
Council Concur Legal Dept X
Finance Dept
Other •
Fiscal Impact: N/A
ikiwo Expenditure Required... Transfer/Amendment
Amount Budgeted Revenue Generated
Total Project Budget City Share Total Project..
SUMMARY OF ACTION:
Water District 90 has existing sewer facilities in the Briar Hills area that were constructed as part
of the original plat and turned over to the district in the 1970's in anticipation of them becoming a
sewer district. In 1999, Renton became the sewer service provider to this area, and with the
construction of the Central Plateau Interceptor Phase II project scheduled this year, will be able to
activate the current "dry" sewers. The district has agreed to transfer the facilities at no cost to the
City.
•
STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
Accept the resolution authorizing the Mayor and City Clerk to sign the Interlocal Agreement for
the Transfer of Sanitary Sewer Facilities from Water District 90 to the City of Renton.
H:\File Sys\W WP-WasteWater\WWP-03-0000 Correspondence-Wastewater\davec\Agreement Water District 90 Agenda Bill.doc\DMCtp
Rentonnetlagnbill/ bh
`SY 0 PLANNING/BUILDING/
PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT
-.Nco� MEMORANDUM
DATE: May 24, 2007
TO: Toni Nelson, Council President
Members of the Renton City Council
VIA: /- Kathy Keolker, Mayor
FROM: Gregg Zimmermarly`�Aministrator
STAFF CONTACT: Dave Christensen, Wastewater Utility Supervisor(ext. 7212)
SUBJECT: Interlocal Agreement between Renton and Water District 90
for Transfer of Sewer Facilities to Renton
ISSUE:
Should the City Council authorize the Mayor and City Clerk to approve and execute the
Interlocal Agreement with Water District 90 for the transfer of sewer facilities to Renton?
Now
RECOMMENDATION:
Authorize the Mayor and City Clerk to approve and execute the Interlocal Agreement with
Water District 90 for the transfer of sewer facilities to Renton.
BACKGROUND SUMMARY:
As part of the plat development known as Briar Hills, platted in the 1970's, the developer
was required to install sanitary sewer mains within the new roadways of the development.
Although there was not a sewer system to connect to at the time, Water District 90 was in
the process of asking its customers to vote on becoming a sewer district along with their
existing water district. The district never received approval to become a sewer district, and
these lines have remained in what is called a"dry" status to this date.
In 1999, the City became the sewer service area provider to the entire East Renton Plateau
area, including the Briar Hills neighborhood. As part of the Wastewater Utility's 2007
Capital Improvement Program, we will be constructing the second phase of our Central
Plateau Interceptor. This interceptor will allow for direct connection of this "dry" system,
thus making it available for the homes in this area to connect to sewer. The facilities were
designed and constructed to allow for long-term service to a large portion of our East
Renton Plateau service area, and with the turnover of these facilities, we will be able to
eliminate two sewage lift stations currently needed to pump to another basin within the
next 5 to 10 years, which will reduce our operating and maintenance costs within this area.
Council/ILA WD90
May 24,2007
Page 2 of 2
Over the past 16 months, the City has been working with Water District 90 to transfer
these facilities from the ownership of the district to the City. An interlocal agreement has
been prepared and accepted by the district, and has been reviewed and approved by the
City Attorney. This interlocal agreement provides for the transfer of all of the"dry"
sewers in the Briar Hills area to the City, at no cost, in an"as is" condition. Because the
district has not maintained these facilities, they did not want to warranty the condition.
Staff believes that these facilities will only need very minor repairs, if any, to make them
ready to accept flows.
CONCLUSION:
The Interlocal Agreement to transfer sewer facilities in the Briar Hills area to Renton from
Water District 90 allows for the City to provide direct service to a portion of our existing
service area, provide for long-term efficiencies in our East Plateau basin, and relieves
Water District 90 of facilities for which they are not the service provider.
Attachment
cc: Lys Hornsby,Utility Systems Director
H:\File Sys\WWP-WasteWater\WWP-03-0000 Correspondence-Wastewater\davec\Agreement Water
District 90 Issue Paper.doc\DMCtp
CITY OF RENTON AND KING COUNTY WATER DISTRICT 90
AGREEMENT FOR THE TRANSFER OF SEWER FACILITIES
This agreement made and entered into this day of , 20 , by and
between KING COUNTY WATER DISTRICT 90, a municipal corporation, hereinafter
referred to as "THE WATER DISTRICT", and the CITY OF RENTON, a Washington
municipal corporation hereinafter referred to as "RENTON", all having been duly
organized and existing under and by virtue of the laws of the State of Washington,
WITNESSETH:
WHEREAS, RENTON provides public services, including water and sewer service,
within its prescribed area; and
WHEREAS, THE WATER DISTRICT provides water service within its prescribed
area; and
WHEREAS, THE WATER DISTRICT has had constructed certain sewer facilities
which exist in areas which are within RENTON's sewer service boundary, and which can
efficiently be managed, operated and maintained by RENTON in conjunction with other
facilities in the City; and
___ WHEREAS, it is in the public interest for the parties herein to enter into an
agreement that provides for the transfer of those sewer facilities to RENTON; now
therefore,
IT IS HEREBY AGREED by and between the parties hereto as follows:
1. Transfer of Sewer System to RENTON. The facilities listed below(commonly
referred to as"Briar Hills Dry Sewers") and as shown on Exhibit "A" Drawing, are
hereby transferred to RENTON by THE WATER DISTRICT. The facilities so
included are:
• Approximately 56—48"Manholes
• Approximately 3540 Linear Feet of 8-inch Concrete Sewer Main
• Approximately 690 Linear Feet of 10-inch Concrete Sewer Main
• Approximately 683 Linear Feet of 12-inch Concrete Sewer Main
• Approximately 2809 Linear Feet of 15-inch Concrete Sewer Main
• Approximately 5224 Linear Feet of 8-inch PVC Sewer Main
• All Appurtenances Associated with these Facilities
THE WATER DISTRICT acknowledges that, pursuant to this agreement, they no
longer have any claim or ownership to the facilities listed above. THE WATER
DISTRICT agrees to execute a Bill of Sale document for transfer of the facilities. Upon
completion of an executed Bill of Sale from THE WATER DISTRICT, RENTON
hereby agrees to manage, operate and maintain the transferred facilities.
'4ar.e 2. Transfer of Easement and Right-of-Way Documents. THE WATER DISTRICT
shall execute any documents or deeds necessary to transfer or assign the Easement and
Right-of-Way documents for the facilities described in Paragraph I above to RENTON,
Page 1
(provided, that THE WATER DISTRICT may retain rights to concurrent use of rights-
of-way or easements as necessary or convenient to the operation of THE WATER ,moi
DISTRICT's system), and RENTON agrees to accept responsibility for all maintenance
or other actions required by said document. Each Agency shall be responsible for its
own costs associated with this transfer. THE WATER DISTRICT shall not have any
liability for disputes arising over said rights-of-way or easements so transferred or
assigned.
3. Disclaimer from Third Party Liability. THE WATER DISTRICT has not operated a
sewer system and has not utilized, inspected, repaired,or maintained the facilities to be
transferred. THE WATER DISTRICT transfers the facilities "As Is" in their present
condition without warranty or representation of condition or their suitability for
RENTON's intended use or any other warranty or representation of any kind
whatsoever. THE WATER DISTRICT shall not be liable for any claims by third
parties arising from acts or damages by RENTON or its customers, arising from the use
of the facilities transferred to RENTON pursuant to this Agreement, including, but not
limited to, any disruption of service related to this transfer. RENTON shall hold
harmless and indemnify THE WATER DISTRICT from any claim within the scope of
this paragraph which may be made by third parties and which indemnity shall include
all costs, including reasonable attorney's fees,related to defense of such action.
4. Frontage Charges. RENTON will not charge any frontage or similar costs to those
customers that have an existing main fronting their property that is transferred to
RENTON by this agreement;provided RENTON may collect usual and customary
connection charges and special assessment district charges common to new customers
connecting to the system, and provided that further subdivision of said customers
property will not preclude RENTON's ability to apply any frontage charges that may be
triggered at the time of development.
5. Conflicts. In the event that RENTON's sewer utility operations and/or facilities within
the Existing Briar Hills Dry Sanitary Sewer Area, identified as Exhibit"A", interfere or
otherwise conflict with THE WATER DISTRICT's existing operations and/or facilities
within the same area identified on Exhibit"A",RENTON shall be responsible for any
and all costs associated with any relocation or modification of THE WATER
DISTRICT's existing facilities.
In the event that RENTON or THE WATER DISTRICT proposes new facilities that
interfere with the other's operations or facilities, other than the Water District's existing
facilities as defined herein, the parties will cooperate to achieve the least expensive,
sound engineering solution. The term "new facilities"does not include normal
maintenances, repair or replacement of existing facilities identified in Exhibit "A".
6. Sanctity of Agreement. This agreement constitutes the entire agreement of the parties,
and there are no representations or oral agreements other than those listed herein, which
vary the terms of this agreement. Future agreements may occur between the parties to
transfer additional facilities by mutual agreement.
7. Obligations Intact. Nothing herein shall be construed to alter the rights,
responsibilities, liabilities or obligations of THE WATER DISTRICT or RENTON
regarding provision of services provided by each of the parties herein, except as
specifically set forth herein.
Page 2
8. Cost Of Transfer. Unless otherwise specifically stated in this agreement, each agency
shall be responsible for its costs associated with this transfers including but not limited
to staff costs or attorney's time to review this agreement or documents arising out of
this agreement. RENTON agrees to prepare all documents required to allow for the
transfer of the facilities identified in this agreement.
DATED this day of , 2007.
Approved by Resolution No. of the City Council of the City of RENTON,
Washington, at its regular meeting held on _day of , 20 .
CITY OF RENTON
By:
Kathy Keolker
Title: Mayor
ATTEST:
Bonnie I. Walton,City Clerk
'tior" Approved by Resolution No. of the Board of Commissioners of King County
Water District 90 of King County, Washington, adopted at its regular meeting held
on J,cv' day of P1 , 20 D9.
KING COUNTY WATER DISTRICT 90
By: "6'2-4'tij /9/""'
Title: V,)_-c.
Page 3
' 62
806.!1
06�d"� 17 i r� 33 32�31 I
s- 14
164 '� I �'/ W 46 +7
1_t_� f i z 1 �1.„._
3.
166 h . I -� 0 �r.9 SE I33rd/LI/ St t 33, St -
167 I ?9 G I /�
31
r-- 140 i 42 ' '43 // 0 51 I
h^h N e r305 I
IL 167 I �. -\ 54 :,rte' I 1
-t_ 1905 1 +4 57 c
i I ,, x'.53 `� �- 56 it -
1 �I
' 1 _ O In '•i 1 64 5 �`�� 1r u tSa+J r 803 1
t , 1 i ____
Lk4 i i.__ In g .d&k_:.p .amu '-
G8 ,E
1 lo. 1'x3..5. �� . _._- 7 ' IOI 71
- - -S:_.________ xi IJCL�Sl 1�1 ,•,..,............7.74a.... ....-...................6.' 74 � •1.. • Iv
�n� )2 f)0--16=- --i0'-;e r ,r1iaiit—i• .
EAST RENTON143 1t2
� T
LIFT STATION 135 SE 137th S: 0165
N - -
L-31 144 8' 0143 >�.wH
> 1145 136 I. - -
1SL
- -- 140 . .
= ES m SE 13.7t_h
Eli LIFT STATICL1+6 142 141 ' _
_ m g• 140 _
Lill
cn
SE.1313th PI
E.13e;tn q -
IR1, : 8' 'Ou 9r R if �'iAth P
, .iti, ,o.
_. .
, .
,,
, , ......,.._.._ _ _ _
___.
. , r .,
.. • --- - , E > . ' .
afr 1i9}h c
•�\,- _- 56--11Qtk.$S-_._ ,\I \-----;'..-'-=
i' ----h/ 9 . re , 1 1 0 ----_--.... --
•
"c-7-i -_ - '--
St
I ' -_.. 1.._ ---`'-. \\_. -..\\ ' 5'\140jth�1 ____. --.-
_ r17
r -N - -
\ -I - f m SE\141t PI
+r S� St t 'N
+ 1 1 _'--- ` -
�-_ _�. r -t — p 4—!----.c _—_-
7----,,- -L- --
11 I i+
' 14!t 1St ; --__ — w ,151 ��'�,•,I—•a ----i - -"'". N " Illk I
't i 1 ' t i -_, ,. I i -- i '- ----- 1._ SE II44th
y
.� --' _.J ---
/„� \\ •✓ '- -r'_�1�; ;� 'SEi 15th P.I V %•� --------- _
/ ' Z, SE 1.46th,S ! I ' ` 1 \� %', ---._-_. ` v
-✓ -i .\. ` - N _ SE 146
,
r I I - - _ �.
' i Xr
49; `SE 148th
v S
ge,A ,
\ •
400 801 . .�
� s,-,,,e i . S
. r ` . . --
.
F- Xnlbi ± " As
Briar - ills _try • Sanitary Sewers
CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON
RESOLUTION NO.
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON,
AUTHORIZING THE MAYOR AND CITY CLERK, TO ENTER INTO AN
INTERLOCAL AGREEMENT WITH KING COUNTY WATER
DISTRICT 90 RELATING TO THE TRANSFER OF SANITARY SEWER
MAINS, MANHOLES AND APPURTENANCES, FROM THE DISTRICT
TO THE CITY OF RENTON.
WHEREAS, the City of Renton provides public services, including water and sewer
service, within its prescribed area; and
WHEREAS, King County Water District 90 provides water service within its
prescribed area; and
WHEREAS, King County Water District 90 has owned sanitary sewer mains, manholes
Now and appurtenances, which exist in areas which are within the City's sewer service boundary, and
which can efficiently be managed, operated and maintained by the City of Renton in conjunction
with other facilities in the City; and
WHEREAS, it is in the public interest for the parties herein to enter into an agreement
to provide for the transfer of the sanitary sewer mains, manholes and appurtenances;
NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RENTON,
WASHINGTON, DOES RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS:
SECTION L The above findings are true and correct in all respects.
SECTION H. The Mayor and City Clerk are hereby authorized, to enter into an
interlocal agreement with King County Water District 90, allowing for the transfer of sanitary
sewer mains, manholes and appurtenances to the City of Renton.
ttmmo.
RESOLUTION NO.
PASSED BY THE CITY COUNCIL this day of , 2007. „ ,
Bonnie I. Walton, City Clerk
APPROVED BY THE MAYOR this day of , 2007.
Kathy Keolker, Mayor
Approved as to form:
Lawrence J. Warren, City Attorney
Date of Publication:
RES:1270:5/16/07:ch
2
C:\Documents and Settings\Mary Ann\My Documents\Winword\Res\1270.doc
Corfespandence. -
Refer a Cali#des Coee
To: Renton City Council via City Clerk 27 Apr 2007
Re: Unopened Road Right of way CIT`OF RENTON
Adjacent to Land Parcel No.- 334570-0183-02
MAY 0 7 2087
My parents and I moved to Renton in 1940 and we have lived at what is now crrKA s 8FFicE
3767 Monterey P1. NE ever since. (havtk ve0,d)
At the regular Renton City Council meeting on 17 Oct 2005 the council approved
the street vacation petition for a portion of Aberdeen Ave NE ( now 112`h Ave SE-
30 feet- 1/2 of a 60 foot right away) File: VAC-05-003
With these conditions:
Obtain and pay for a written appraisal by a certified appraiser( M.A.I.)
To determine the compensation due the city
Pay a street vacation fee to the city of Renton - $250.00 - paid 28 July 2005
44,,, Give a water line easement to Coal Creek Utility District
I put this parcel up for sale in April 2005 after submitting a Pre-Application to the
to the City.
A buyer found that the size of this parcel was not 16,800 square feet
After a survey the corrected size is 11,699 square feet-
Reduced 5,101 square feet which equals 30.35%
The King County Assessor has corrected the section maps
I also requested the Assessor to reduce the Real Estate Tax
On 24 April 2007 this was approved by change order 74071-072
All this has taken 2 years - -
1111
k
Now - I am asking the Renton City council to waive the Certified Appraisal and
the compensation fee requirement.
Because :
For over 65 years my father and I have been paying real estate taxes on this
unopened 1/2 of the street as if we owned it.
This /2 of street right of way ( 30 feet X 250 ) was donated to King County
when our land parcel was originally plotted by C. D. Hillman in 1909.
This street right of way will never be opened because the City Council has
approved street vacation..
Paying the appraisal and compensation fee to acquire property that we have been
paying taxes on for over 65 years is unfair and a financial hardship.
Real estate taxes will continue to be paid to the City of Renton when this street
vacation is completed.
As a life long resident of the City of Renton, your assis • e is great--
• reat ap recut +.
Sincerely, ' '' D o
3 767 Monterey PINE
Renton, WA 98056
Phone: 425-228-1525
Cell: 425-894-4211
E-mail: rdohrn@Juno.com
a
•
RECORD OF SURVEY l
A PORTION OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF
- SECTION 32, TOWNSHIP 24 NORTH, RANGE 5 EAST, WILLAMETTE MERIDIAN '
i...
CITY OF RENTON, KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON
GV ik":.... END RFBAR/GP ENO REBAR/CAP
Q• 3 MARKED LS 2 °T't M48NOD LS 29276
EDP Fy S88-09'111 108.92'(JULY 2006) (Jllr zoD6)
s PER RDs 11611159 ;.y'^ '
FTm DEBAR k CAP f,
ii
LS 23745
HELD FOR NORTH UNE ` ;,,,•-1
LOTS 6'' ''�,
.:x•• . • 30'NORTHEASTERLY OF
�,y� t'4 BEST FR AS-BUILT
S Y= vZ-:'- DIXIEPIW E OF 110TH PUCE S.E 1
0.32' ':, 4' 1
wa.°
:\ •
0 15 3060 -
SCALE: 1-.30' \ ''
DETAIL
NO SCALE 1 "' _ LLI1---
LEGAL DESCRIPTION • \ \ NYes
,.7..;f�4"••-n•,1`\ .o • ZZ 1 x
ALL THAT PORTION OF LOT 5,BLOCK 4,C.D.HILLMAN'S GARDEN OF EDEN NO.7, .. e� $.(jJ
ACCORDING TO THE PUT THEREOF,RECORDED W VOLUME 16 OF PLATS,PAGE 18, ''',:,;,,,-,.4,,,,:::",...!..Z...:-,:\
�j
LYING EAST OF MONTEREY PLACE R.E.(110TH PUCE SE),RECORDS OF KING COUNTY. ~' '\ s .1
WASHINGTON. • ^.`."'; ? _ ✓T i
SITUATE IN THE CITY OF REALTOR.COUNTY OF KING,STATE OF WASHINGTON. \ '4'\.
,.„-- V..._ A 0 m
C4i4:1-.-ga Te
•
SURVEYOR'S NOTES •,„:•,:..'fiq`4.
x xs .'A FND REBW GP g
1.BASIS OF BEARINGS PER PUT OF WHITEIWVK BY KENNETH J.OILER DATED JANUARY 1995 AND �y � - /
RECORDED IN VOLUME 174 OF RATS,PAGES 9-11,UNDER RECORDING N0.9507250459. :1 -,.A-'"'", - MNIKED IS 19651
RECORDS OF KING COUNTY,WASHINGTON. `,'\�F yt .' - (AIRY OF UNE
2.ALL TOLE INFORMATION SHOWN ON THIS MAP HAS BEEN EXTRACTED FROM COMMONWEALTH LAND `XLX ,T`f } ;., I (JULY 2006) �¢
TITLE COMPANY OF PUGET SOUND.LLC COMMITMENT NO.RJ-20236218,DATED JUNE 7,2006. T 3, u,. 1 m
- LN PREPARING THIS MAP.BARDHAUSFN CONSULTING ENGINEERS•INC.IAS CONDUCTED NO .. 4 B
INDEPENDENT TIRE.SEARCH NOR IS BARGHAUSEN CONSULTING ENGMEERS,INC.AWARE OF ANY •- \ `ate ''1,-4a+f;'u, 8 $
TITLE ISSUES AFFECTING THE SURVEYED PROPERLY OTHER THAN THOSE SHOWN ON THE MAP \ ..„�. ' p -. m
AND DISCLOSED BY THE REFERENCED COMMONWEALTH COMMITMENT. BA GHAUSEN CONSULTING ''',L(4, ,3 -
ENGINEERS.INC.HAS RELIED WHOLLY ON COMMONWEALTH'S REPRESENTATIONS OF THE TITLE'S I '. _
CONDITION TO PREPARE THIS SURVEY AND THEREFORE BARULAUSEN CONSULTING ENGINEERS, � L. 7' 1.;e42,X
INC.QUALIFIES THE MAP'S ACCURACY AND COMPLETENESS TO THAT!SCENT. ••w- Ys e> « 6
,USI ,
3.PROPERTY AREA .11,699±SQUARE FEET(0.269 i-ACRES). --,--4._... 4.m g
4.TAX PARCEL NUMBER ON THE SUBJECT PROPERTY IS:3345700183. ^- .,.-a l RS a 99'6
F.- ti
S.THERE ARE NO BUILDINGS ON THE SITE.
RP"--.aWj ,-,21
6.ALL DISTANCES ARE W FEET(U.S.SURVEY FEET). -r-N1 •'n'`L-7.1'.1,-;:/i-''
,;.VA.,-1,N, I
7.THIS IS A HELD TRAVERSE SURVEY. A SOKKA ENE-SECOND ELECTRONIC TOTAL STATION WAS 5 z.,i-' s
USED TO MEASURE THE ANGULAR AND DISTANCE REUTKINSHIPS BETWEEN THE CONTROLLING Elm REBAR/CAPD e`%:w`..`3:;�:=:`•
LIONUMENJTAT1ON AS SHOWN. CLOSURE RATIOS OF THE TRAVERSE MET OR EXCEEDED THOSE KMRI(m LS 29737 -, ^y A ''
SPECIFIED IN WOE 332-130-090. ALL INSTRUMENTS AND EQUIPMENT HAVE BEEN MAINTAINED (JULY 2006) f ..'`.�,JY =3:'Y.I;-:.,� FND ROTM/GP END MONUMENT
Li;
IN ADJUSTMENT ACCORDING TO MANUFACTURERS'SPECIFICATIONS. �.ra,)E'.y�K'-";`,;' MARKED LS 30341 IN CASE_____A)
. (AI'Lr 2006) (JULY 200 -
i'fs�w'-t .` ',IT,'
_a'r' :..
,\Y',.TA -• F,4.„,, 2 57'49 - •-
SET REBAR k GP V`: ,, „ ,,1-'r%,,,,,,,,� �:' _ N
• "BCE 78279"W DECEMBER 2006 02.4,1‘.4-43:41-J,;'67 ,-,13,4r/C`;'..%- -
B FOND MONUMENT AS NOTED IT-s g�:. '... �' ND MJOU11ENi §
.. :” 3- (J GSE 205
O FOUND COFNER AS NOTED __ e `;% 37 (JULY 2006) P.
BIND WNWENT /
W GSE
.t 24 04 (JULY 2006)
A 4A A - Y Al SIIa G7A 1�\
pronon(M rrPTWFIC..ATF• LAND SURVEYOR'S CERTIFICATE: 5.�1A"'`�<,, Qc,HAvs 18215 72ND AVENUE SOUTH DBAW6BY ecuCORM SW 1/4,NE 1/4, SECTION 32, T24N, R5E W.IA. SHT
TI116 mop norm1y - F 9 ILNOY mese Ny me 6. my 4 ,�-s"'4 4" ,�';�I�' GTE
aoreao„incalf.. SI mean of the Soreey c � Q• , Fy KENT, 51W98032 sr.,' 12/27/06 SURVEY FDR
Recording Act o1 the �i
of IFI)'Y KAHN 3 - m` I.. (425)251-6222 1-_yo, MURRAY KAHN 1
in DECEMBER,zoos � ���'���!`1�''r o ..1 (425)251-8782 FAX CHECKED 9r; 2291 N.E. 60TH STREET
20070109900011_ s �4o -,. ��. ( ENG SEATTLE, WA 98115 OF
'/p�.�� JOB m
6N/II nas SMAS 14 NC, AE LAITp c.:( 0,/ �p*' CML ENGINEERING,LAND PLANNING, 12518
KUW OOIINYY,W R WIWAM 7c a•, 2 ]NO EN0M4 SURVEYING,ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES PNDLCT N0:
-- „-,eAs OS-18-07 KIN!'_ nni InITv \A/ACL111•If_TflNl 1
Juno e-mail prune(' i nu, 1 iviar LAM i i L:v 1:v7 ,page 1 of i •
Ul
g 'e'6 N
ft
in 74
1 u
C:, �vA 21930# 07
03 t-
LLI
E 288 .67 297.69 (2) '.-. • .. s88-o9=1i , >
«_ 10 8.92
cl-A 90 tA 15
T :� a
t' Oo rI
r1 d . 41. _
JA 03-045 -LLA w-4
rn
1002900008
1.16 AC _ 0 0 3 "11699#
50 678# o '
o
t''
k•A ,- ,p + om
d+ 1 p
a a
1 t�li126.37 +Ct
1 91 - S88-11-31E rN"
,: L�Q. o 0
GP __ S to
-I
li
., _ x-
39142# 4 el 1
el
8-11-31w 416.50 0 -4
297. 92 1
1
riJ
r- '
1795# -4 i
'4
99
f
1693# . F'
-- Ronald G Dohm
(
' I
I , . '- ' '''' '''l ''' .1='''.. '1/ IL.' 1;'''''i r".1 1 I\I„ ,,,,::f i ',,..) .1 ,,.1
1 /
„...„ ( , , ,;, ,t 1,;,, .,..1 ,1 ,,,,,•„..„,,, , .,,, 1„...,
1,(1-" ,, ,, ? ,i').Lt ,,.... ;
.., ,, 1. ) ,:1
, II •
,
11,o1i:11,' 1.1119 ,1;•• r , I , g rr.: c. \,,,Id ,9 ......,-.
•r rg`' . i ,.. 1
,,, 1 :''-.., le ,
":"....','".. 1' I 1 1
17, 1 1,.... ..1 • J ''
,--
\„..1, 2..i777,4,?,!c, 1 !,--•-.„:,!,.,-.-.' [
1 'i"! -,,.
\.....„,Lal..-....,..........-,,,..„.....,.....,...........11.‘19.....-.„....,...„.......,. ! '! •-•",
1,.,)!..)-''i '.7.> ,,-.7--- I ,..,4....„4,,
, .,9
,
iv 1 , \\ ,i:.:1,11:,:,i'‘(li fii".!.-i..'! .a 4 1.1
,,,, ,1,0 •1 ' 1r1 - .. -.,.. .., .. .
fif \ ,, ''.44)„ ,„, •I,.., I, ',.r.i ii
ii.,, ,it,,,, ,, L,1
i''i• i i I it')LI.'
,,., i,C.tItl t.' •
II.',,t.4 tll r-I'„:I ir.) II gl J4 I J, I
1 i 1,11 1 t II...,... '1 1m.o_...,,., , .-....,. ,,,
,.. .!:- 4. t, -Nt; ty.1 tt„, it ' 'tiOI 1 E,, %.•1 "1''1:1 I.' 1"111,1 11'1''1'1.1 '11 ,.-'• \-1 /'')
/D-11 e P't.s. .L...,,'J
wi ' ' 'lfg•P' 'V",0'. ....3. ..,,1 'N11,4 , '''' LT., 't 1), ''''••'''
.,,.)'*:,,,,,,.,,,:i A..,i i ,!..,1=,..,./.•.,-. ,i,, .
4.4.55 , fii A .,..., ,,,,, ,,,,,, , , •,,1 , -, ,i
r..,
,1: !,.•,,„,,, ,-, , ,,,!). , ,.
A l'II ,z,t, - ' I I- II.I.
't) 2 I "'I It"I' ,IIII `'I.,'''''IN tItt, \ k '
9
'' iii,l'Pl.. it)IPI'1.7"It' •- *,t''III 1 I
\ •
ttn, ,.. ,\,
'
-im.h. ..4.,..a1--.- 1
1.1.i.,...1...,_,1 1.- • 3 IS11! ,,,....!1', 1.1, 1
1,1, -0 Ilt,6',Ill Illt, , ryliil \ c,;MI• ,,
, ,•
,04 '4,r1F ;i 'T‘*.'1",11IY'4' :31,10 , 1, '[..-4,1''
7/1'1/;
, ,,1; 4,reggrag tt, N \ - P,4!
1 ,
1 1.
1., r' 7e.,' \ 1.... "'/1.1 '.:4,.., )?1.11 ,'4!!.'I 7 , ,0.J., i •
L1 . • .. .. .--..'"--.:-..„.. . ?;.'-''.' .• ...-• • .,.., '2.•
• ... .................._......
r 2 II
...„„,..,
...
it,::IX' ;, •),.,.,.'I'Z'i 1 - /-' l' 1.'
\ .„ r ..g'g *-••-•..' :',. ,, ,,g,b,r r
11
...-. ,,..
. . .... ... . . . . " ,
1fr'34,, , , ,,,
'13 4''''''';'' \
.1). .17:1 ''
,,..,
,.' '''' . ,
).":1,
! di11.11L I '34 i 0 ro
:',11 WS i
1
'i I 3') 1''
„,„, ., ,,,,•1•;',,g,og,_ .,..„,,,, .„r r„, ''; ..„ 134I, I _...., ....,,,_.,,,________, . , \ • .
.-- -".--.'.'"ii Y'.•:.! .c:.,,,...,• - .- "- - .--.-- - ...14 ti.4,......,. (4 )4 „,.,... I , .;,[1,..,
l'i' '''''.--- •:'.•:'F'''' -*-A 'V!'.13""411711,1-1-MI:k1,:i 1194'',F-Ar'- i'.';$04 ''-‘.., \ '' 11„ g', --•.1 1 1:,'1 5'.' I Igg '''''
LI
44..r• ''''''' 'g ''',„•'..,, 14,;.', ".1 .:1-',g:
1-,eg,g‘ ,',.;' '' - '''' gr',0 ,• .!' -... - . g -. CI ,k,jj 11 '',i. P'' \ k'j ' s' , 'Ir,,t1 .,,j t I .,V I•'I.'''''ILI' a'
„4';' .•,13.1 ,,„ i. ,,:,1'‘9,' I 1 , 1
''''''.";: ri 1F:,111 ';' i:**II 1 ‘‘I.,,,15'1 ,
I
4,,,,,' ,, ,, 1 Y:) t.,,,:} ....,,,,Z :1, ,'r' ' '''' ' 1 ' '..,,, I
--,-I I 2 11,1/A 11.1 13 1\'A,
''l ''';'•-'.... >V/ ' '' “...:' ••- 4,4g '--1 rggg..1
' \r!r,iFi'
, 1
.,- .:1 .1'....:4 r'ii",',•',r, . i r.',1
01
, [11 '' ' • '-'-" ' )'
r",,,•Na ,/ r r g gi „ite,r: ,; 2;: g-.1";- , 1.'.; 10 • -1.• !'' \ ---
e ,
.., L
'31\-''''-1,11:1;
'''' 1 g4 .•,_..c...,...1,;!..-g:t - --- -''r rl
''',i' '`i f..... '"1.1i 1..:::• ;k1 1:'3 , 3c1/11 1/11 i 111 '''A., N111' 1.„....,,1/;;!, 1 i '1.1.1.11(1 1,,Alf 14.1, 11..--2.1.r?„....1::.'„:".,....! _:;!,,I • -'
IFl FIF
r11FF1?..1.,.F 5 1 11,S;,,1 3.. AS! r'S S 11.,
\''''11 1‘4,, S.41 11, 1,i1' ' '11!7
.g 'e".; . '''''" r'.• 1-
1171 r
'10
'%11' ' 40. +410,:rg .. •141 t:T111 N r ,14r.sq I r.,,1• "" ;I" ' '' ; , 'iI,' ',Al l' tI:IllIt.,Itt tt, i'"I;
t,Itll , 11,,thli 11 - 3' '0 3 11 3.!;,'
1.!' 1 ".';": !, y .r
'''L;l'i':'' i.'
'' 9y):19:1:,.4,10._Gli),,11.1 ,4 I A.,
4,3111!"'ll \ V ' '111IA, 1111''1'.1;i1,' :1 11
1(1111°1' 1 1.1",. 11131'.141*C IA V31 i'1 111 liatiri -' " kr, ','gg'r,,,g,.1. ,,,',','4.„g'11,:',1\,,,, I/',.'
[. • 1 ' q!.t!
';) ...,;., ) 2.,), ,, .!...",:',.,-4' .'"''''.i.,:414(44'1,4
Li.!'il Pi Iii,,"i,,D,\'(",'.,',' ',./ I 4`': r , ,,,s.i,t, !f,) ,;1
..,
F ' ',.?.,',1..-,..1 ! , ,
-• •- - .•---i',,,,,,?5: 1.'!,Z2 :,,, . '11t,,,,,,,,,,,,, 1 ,.. \'..k.',....11. "i,-,e/ :1 '''"41 '',5,..r.. )':1'.., likr'C'.,..._..... ..-,
i 15,•,: / ti 4 •1 ', 24...ir '''' 4.,''..:' ...,':2 g 75 l
,'” i..., 211 A r''' f'-' e.,'
11S"11 " 1111 ,11,1111.111,,,1i'1111111111.1)1
..',
. ..!
lI6,f tIttl, , I.,., .1„) 1:1'4,11*rm ,trw
-1 , ( tti-ntr.t irgM,IITI,' 3' IIV' .,, 23 ,,,;,,;','''
‘,?.;,. :/' . 11 .,„ ,..),
T
' 1, .,
''
Q
King County Department of Assessments Scott Noble
King County Administration Building Assessor
500 Fourth Avenue,Room 7534ep
Seattle,WA 98104-2384 Fte aw
3.0/29C, io �1
(206)296-5121 FAX 296-0106 ea�i, hq e��rto,'4sses
98-'O Rod tion '17e,_t
April 24, 2007 � a°',04479 s
RONALD G DOHRN
3767 MONTEREY PL NE =Fa
RENTON, WA 98056
Subject: Notification of correction to real property valuation(RCW 84.48.065)
Account Number: 334570-0183-02 Change Order: 'T4071 - 07l_
The following correction(s) in real property value have been made to the tax roll(s)
indicated:
Tax Roll Land From Land To Imps From Imps To
Taxable Value: 2005 108,000 101,000 0 0
Appraised Value: 2005 108,000 101,000 0 0
Taxable Value: 2006 115,000 108,000 0 0 `""o
Appraised Value: 2006 115,000 108,000 0 0
Value was decreased for the following reason(s):
Incorrect characteristic data
Please be aware, YOU WILL NOT BE ABLE TO APPEAL THE ABOVE VALUE IF this is notification
of your new current use value,exemption value,or your appeal determination. The values indicated above
are merely adjustments to the appraised value for which you have already received notification and an appeal
opportunity.
If you disagree with this value,you have 60 days from the date of this letter to appeal. If you have
questions about this letter please call Jackie Bell at(206)296-5111.Petitions to appeal may be
obtained from the King County Board of Equalization,King County Administration Bldg,Room 510,
Seattle,WA 98104-2384,phone(206)296-3496. Should you choose to appeal,please attach a copy of
this letter to your appeal petition, or make reference to the change order number and date shown above
in your petition.
Sincerely,
Jackie Bell
Administrative is t III 4400
by:
E #; IN
City Clerk
Kathy Keolker-Wheeler, Mayor Bonnie I.Walton
October 18, 2005
Ron G. Dohrn
3767 Monterey Pl. NE
Renton, WA 98056
Re: Street Vacation Petition for Portion of Aberdeen Ave. NE (112th Ave. SE);
File VAC-05-003
Dear Mr. Dohrn:
At the regular Council meeting of October 17, 2005, the Renton City Council approved
the referenced street vacation request, subject to the condition that you provide
satisfactory proof that the Coal Creek Utility District has received and is satisfied with
any easements which are necessary to protect its facilities in the requested vacation area.
paid 15"-- .26c Z - W.
At this time, a(250 street vacation processing fee payable to the City of Renton, is due
to the City Clerk. Concurrently, you as the petitioner shall also be responsible for
,, submitting an appraisal in writing prepared by an M.A. I. or other qualified appraiser, as
approved by the City, and furnish the results to the Planning/Building/Public Works
Administrator for evaluation and recommendation to the City Council for acceptance and
determination of the compensation due the City.
If I can provide additional information, please feel free to contact me.
Sincerely,
.t- •� (.IJCZC�c r�
Bonnie I. Walton
City Clerk
cc: Mayor Kathy Keolker-Wheeler
Council President Terri Briere /
David Christensen, Utility Engineering Supervisor
1411;\''
4)7 1'
4/0))
1055 South Grady Way-Renton,Washington 98055-(425)430-6510/FAX(425)430-6516 R E N T O N
This paper contains 50%recycled material,30%post consumer
AHEAD OF THE CURVE
11 dried iVorniafion 4r Council rev/&t)
October 17,2005 Renton City Council Minutes Page 356
Continuing, Mr. Cannon said the primary transportation problem is congestion,
which is not addressed in the TPA program. He emphasized that the State of 4,400
Washington is fortunate to have an initiative process, and expressed his
concerns regarding the way the TPA legislation was written and presented. Mr.
Cannon predicted that the transportation revenue bill enacted to increase the
fuel tax will be defeated. He concluded that a plan is needed before the money
is spent.
Councilman Clawson pointed out some of the problems Renton faces in regards
to traffic congestion, and asked Mr. Cannon how transportation projects should
be funded and if he would he support an initiative that calls for a higher gas tax
to fund projects. Mr. Cannon stated that taxpayers want a plan that is clearly
defined, and he would support an increased gas tax when he sees what the gas
tax is going to provide for the State.
Public comment was invited. There being none, it was MOVED BY
PERSSON, SECONDED BY PALMER, COUNCIL CLOSE THE PUBLIC
MEETING. CARRIED.
Council discussion ensued during which Councilmembers Briere, Palmer,
Persson, Corman, Clawson, and Law expressed their opposition to I-912.
MOVED BY BRIERE, SECONDED BY CORMAN, COUNCIL ADOPT A
RESOLUTION STATING ITS OPPOSITION TO I-912. CARRIED. (See
page 360 for resolution.)
PUBLIC HEARINGS This being the date set and proper notices having been posted and published in
Annexation: Park Terrace, SE accordance with local and State laws, Mayor Keolker-Wheeler reopened the
112th P1 &Anacortes Ave NE public hearing continued from 10/3/2005, to consider the proposed expanded ItaS
annexation and zoning of 80 acres located generally between SE 112th Pl. on
the north and NE 6th Pl. on the south, and between 136th Ave. SE on the west
and 144th Ave. SE, if extended, on the east(Park Terrace).
Don Erickson, Senior Planner, explained that the public hearing was continued
to allow a 30-day separation between the first public hearing (held 9/12/2005)
on the zoning of the expanded site, and the second public hearing at which
action can be taken on the matter.
Public comment was invited. There being none, it was MOVED BY NELSON,
SECONDED BY CLAWSON, COUNCIL CLOSE THE PUBLIC HEARING.
CARRIED.
MOVED BY CLAWSON, SECONDED BY LAW, COUNCIL: HOLD THE
FIRST READING OF THE ORDINANCE ANNEXING THE 80-ACRE PARK
TERRACE EXPANDED SITE, HOLD THE FIRST READING OF THE
ORDINANCE REZONING 3.4 ACRES TO RENTON'S R-10 ZONE, AND
HOLD THE FIRST READING OF THE ORDINANCE REZONING 63
ACRES TO RENTON'S R-8 ZONE. CARRIED. (See page 360 for
•
ordinances.)
Vacation: Aberdeen Ave NE, This being the date set and proper notices having been posted and published in
Dohrn, VAC-05-003 accordance with local and State laws, Mayor Keolker-Wheeler opened the
public hearing to consider the petition to vacate an unopened portion of
Aberdeen Ave. NE right-of-way, 30 feet in width and 255 feet in length, located ten/°`
south of NE 40th St. at Monterey PI. NE. (Ron G. Dohrn; VAC-05-003).
Karen McFarland, Engineering Specialist, stated that pursuant to State and City
3 Code, more than two-thirds of the abutting property owners must sign the
October 17,2005 Renton City Council Minutes Page 357
vacation petition. In this case, 100% of the abutting owners have signed the
petition. She pointed out that the City does not own any facilities in the right-
I of-way, and that Coal Creek Utility District owns an eight-inch water line in the
southern portion of the right-of-way.
Ms. McFarland explained that the petitioner seeks this vacation in association
with the proposed Dohrn Short Plat to reduce the limitations on development of
the site, and to reduce future congestion. Additionally, the petitioner contends
that development of the right-of-way into a road will unnecessarily duplicate
the access provided by 113th Ave. SE.
Since this right-of-way is undeveloped, Ms. McFarland stated that City Code
does not require special notification to property owners in the vicinity;
however, three City of Newcastle property owners to the east of the site were
notified. She reported that the vacation petition received no objections when
circulated to City department and outside agencies. Planning/Building/Public
Works Department staff recommends that the vacation be approved, subject to
Coal Creek Utility District receiving any necessary easements.
Public comment was invited.
= Ron Dohrn, 3767 Monterey Pl. NE, Renton, 98056, introduced himself as the
petitioner, and asked Council to approve the vacation.
Mark Shinn, 8529 113th Ave. SE, Newcastle, 98056, thanked City staff for
explaining the vacation process to him. and inquired as to why he was not asked
to sign the petition since his property abuts the vacation area.
!!f City Attorney Larry Warren explained that when the City owns a right-of-way,
it does not own the underlying fee interest in the property. The fee interest
remains with the original dedicating owner. He stated that in this instance, the
full vacation area came from one dedication, and the party that dedicated the
property still owns the underlying fee. Therefore, the property dedicator is
100% of the abutting property owners to this particular vacation. Mr. Warren
added that when the property is vacated, all of the property will go to the
underlying fee owner.
Additionally, Mr. Shinn asked that the surrounding property owners be
informed of the future development.
James Toole, 11505 SE 85th Lane, Newcastle, 98056, commended City staff
for helping him understand the vacation process. Pointing out that his property
abuts the vacation area, Mr. Toole indicated that he does not want a street
behind his property. He urged Council to approve the vacation.
Mary Toole, 11505 SE 85th Lane, Newcastle, 98056, spoke in favor of the
street vacation, saying that she does not want the subject property to be a street.
There being no further public comment, it was MOVED BY LAW,
SECONDED BY PERSSON, COUNCIL CLOSE THE PUBLIC HEARING.
CARRIED.
{ MOVED BY CLAWSON, SECONDED BY LAW, COUNCIL APPROVE
THE STREET VACATION REQUEST SUBJECT TO THE PETITIONER
PROVIDING SATISFACTORY PROOF THAT COAL CREEK UTILITY
DISTRICT HAS RECEIVED AND IS SATISFIED WITH ANY EASEMENTS
NECESSARY TO PROTECT ITS FACILITIES IN THE VACATION AREA.
CARRIED.
Municipal Code
*41110
9-14-5 STREET VACATION PROCESS:
If the petition for street vacation is approved by the City Council the applicant may complete the
process as follows: (Ord. 3635, 6-7-1982)
A. Applicant shall pay a street vacation processing fee in the amount stipulated by RMC 4-1-180G
to defray the remaining administrative costs of processing and completing the proposed vacation.
B. The City shall receive compensation in accordance with RCW 35.79.030, which amount for the
purpose of this Chapter is to be determined by an appraisal; provided, that the City Council shall have
authority, upon recommendation of the administration, to accept real property or a property right in lieu
of a part or all of the cash compensation that would be paid. When the value of the property or property
right is less than the cash compensation required for the alley or street right-of-way to be vacated, the
petitioner shall pay the difference to the City. When the value of the property or property right exceeds
the value of the alley or street right-of-way to be vacated, the City shall pay the difference to the
petitioner.
C. Following a recommendation for vacation after a public hearing by the City Council or
committee thereof, the petitioner shall make, or cause to be made, an appraisal in writing by an M.A.I. or
other qualified appraiser, as approved by the City, and furnish the results thereof unto the
Planning/Building/Public Works Administrator for evaluation and recommendation to the City Council
for acceptance and determination of the compensation due the City. In the event other property or
property rights are accepted in lieu of payment, the petitioner shall further obtain appraisals of the fair
market value of property or property rights to be given to the City in lieu of cash compensation as
contemplated in subsection B of this Section. (Ord. 4266, 4-16-1990; amd. Ord. 4860, 9-18-2000)
D. Financial Incentives For Area A Of The Auto Mall Improvement Area: All street vacation fees
and compensation for right-of-way may be waived by the City Council for developing properties in Auto
Mall Improvement Area A (that area bounded by Grady Way South, Rainier Avenue South, I-405, and
Lind Avenue South) when:
1. The properties are designated to be vacated on the Auto Mall Improvement Plan Map
(Resolution No. 3182);
2. The application for street vacation conforms to RMC 9-14-10, Administrative Procedure For
Right-Of-Way Vacations; and
3. The uses proposed conform to RMC 4-2-060, Zoning Use Table. (Ord. 4723, 5-11-1998)
E. When a street or alley is vacated for a governmental agency, and compensation is required,
compensation shall be based upon the administrative costs of the vacation and may, at the discretion of
the City Council, be based upon original cost to the City of acquisition. No governmental agency is
exempt from compensating the City for the vacation of a street or alley right-of-way. (Ord. 4266,
4-16-1990)
F. In the event that the compensation for the vacation has not been paid within ninety (90) days of
the determination by the City Council of the compensation to be paid, the petition shall be deemed to
have been abandoned and shall be denied. (Ord. 3635, 6-7-1982)
4+410
Printed on 5/17/2007 Page 1
APPROVED BY
CRY COUNCIL
PUBLIC SAFETY COMMITTEE
COMMITTEE REPORT Date -41. d0 7
June 4, 2007
Traffic Enforcement Cameras for Red Light and Speeding Enforcement
(Referred May)7 2007)
f�l
The Committee recommends concurrence in the staff recommendation to implement the
use of traffic enforcement cameras for red light and speeding enforcement at selected
school zones. The Committee also recommends approval of the cooperative purchasing
agreement with the City of Seattle to enable the City to use the agreement's master
contract provisions to execute a contract with American Traffic Solutions.
The Committee also recommends adding a new section 10-12-15, Traffic Safety
Cameras, to City Code. The Committee further recommends that the resolution regarding
the cooperative purchasing agreement with the City of Seattle be presented for reading
and adoption, and that the ordinance regarding the City Code addition be presented for
first reading.
/ vU
. /114/-7
Denis W. Law, Chair
Ikon Persson, Vice-chair
andy Corman, Member
Copy: Kevin Milosevich, Chief of Police
Joseph McGuire, Court Services Director
/Idop/ed 6-y 7
CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON
RESOLUTION NO. 33??
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON,
APPROVING FINAL PLAT(HIGHLANDS PARK, FILE NO. LUA-07-
016FP).
WHEREAS, a petition for the approval of a final plat for the subdivision of a certain tract
of land as hereinafter more particularly described, located within the City of Renton, has been duly
approved by the Planning/Building/Public Works Department; and
WHEREAS, after investigation, the Administrator of the Planning/Building/Public Works
Department has considered and recommended the approval of the final plat, and the approval is
proper and advisable and in the public interest; and
WHEREAS,the City Council has determine that appropriate provisions are made for the
public health, safety, and general welfare and for such open spaces, drainage ways, streets or
roads, alleys, other public ways, transit stops, potable water supplies, sanitary wastes, parks and
recreation, playgrounds, schools, school grounds, sidewalks and other planning features that
assure safe walking conditions for students who walk to and from school; and
WHEREAS,the City Council has determined that the public use and interest will be
served by the platting of the subdivision and dedication;
NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RENTON,
WASHINGTON, DOES RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS:
SECTION I. The above findings are true and correct in all respects.
SECTION H. The final plat is hereby approved pertaining to the following described
real estate, to wit:
1
RESOLUTION NO.
(The property, consisting of approximately 18.1 acres, is located
between Rosario Ave. NE and Vesta Ave. NE and SE 2nd Pl.)
Such plat is subject to the laws and ordinances of the City of Renton and subject to the findings,
conclusions and recommendation of the Planning/Building/Public Works Department dated
May 22, 2007.
PASSED BY THE CITY COUNCIL this day of , 2007.
Bonnie I. Walton, City Clerk
APPROVED BY THE MAYOR this day of , 2007.
Kathy Keolker, Mayor
Approved as to form:
Lawrence J. Warren, City Attorney
RES.1271:5/25/07:ch
2
EXHIBIT A
LEGAL DESCRIPTION
PARCEL A:
LOT 1, KING COUNTY SHORT PLAT NUMBER 678063-R, RECORDED UNDER RECORDING NUMBER
7812110857.
PARCEL B:
THAT PORTION OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF SECTION 14,
TOWNSHIP 23 NORTH, RANGE 5 EAST, WILLAMETTE MERIDIAN, IN KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON,
DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS:
BEGINNING AT A POINT NORTH 00°28'02" WEST A DISTANCE OF 30.00 FEET AND NORTH
88°55'44" WEST A DISTANCE OF 30.00 FEET FROM THE CENTER OF SAID SECTION 14;
THENCE ALONG THE WESTERLY MARGIN OF THE AUGUST GERBER ROAD (156TH AVENUE
SOUTHEAST) AS CONVEYED TO KING COUNTY BY DEED RECORDED UNDER RECORDING NUMBER
1094241, NORTH 00°28'02" WEST A DISTANCE OF 472.53 FEET TO THE TRUE POINT OF
BEGINNING OF THE TRACT HEREIN DESCRIBED;
THENCE CONTINUING NORTH 00°28'02" WEST A DISTANCE OF 157.51 FEET;
THENCE NORTH 89°01' 16" WEST A DISTANCE OF 1248.07 FEET TO THE EAST LINE OF THE
WEST 30.00 FEET OF SADI SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER;
THENCE ALONG SAID EAST LINE SOUTH 00°33'02" EAST A DISTANCE OF 157.07 FEET;
THENCE SOUTH 88°59'57" EAST A DISTANCE OF 1247.82 FEET TO THE TRUE POINT OF
BEGINNING;
EXCEPT THOSE PORTIONS CONVEYED TO FRANKLIN T. TETER AND C. LENA TETER, HUSBAND
AND WIFE, BY DEEDS RECORDED UNDER RECORDING NUMBERS 6400741 AND 6417877.
PARCEL C:
PARCEL A, CITY OF RENTON LOT LINE ADJUSTMENT NUMBER LUA-06-052-LLA, HIGHLANDS
PARK, RECORDED UNDER RECORDING NUMBER 20061011900002, IN KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON.
PARCEL D:
LOT 4, KING COUNTY SHORT PLAT NUMBER 484106, RECORDED UNDER RECORDING NUMBER
8505170617.
i
w 4 5
52
NSET B1-W
NE 1,0 A00pN R9' CP)J NTON IS ----
�r900 RE
IN
e
8 9 10 z 11
REN TON
1
NE 4TH ST 0 _
TNE 3RD 6
2111k
GREENWOOD SE 132ND ST
CEMETERY
L
17 16 15 _ SE 2ND P[. _Q14
E Ste : i
16
i/If
BAR %
1 4)* MAPLEWOOD
GOLF COURSE r o
VICINITY MAP
1- _ JDoO't
•
CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON
RESOLUTION NO. jgBD
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON,
APPROVING FINAL PLAT(SHY CREEK,FILE NO. LUA-07-002FP).
WHEREAS, a petition for the approval of a final plat for the subdivision of a certain tract
of land as hereinafter more particularly described, located within the City of Renton, has been duly
approved by the Planning/Building/Public Works Department; and
WHEREAS, after investigation, the Administrator of the Planning/Building/Public Works
Department has considered and recommended the approval of the final plat, and the approval is
proper and advisable and in the public interest; and
WHEREAS,the City Council has determine that appropriate provisions are made for the
public health, safety, and general welfare and for such open spaces, drainage ways, streets or
roads, alleys, other public ways, transit stops, potable water supplies, sanitary wastes, parks and
recreation, playgrounds, schools, school grounds, sidewalks and other planning features that
assure safe walking conditions for students who walk to and from school; and
WHEREAS, the City Council has determined that the public use and interest will be
served by the platting of the subdivision and dedication;
NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RENTON,
WASHINGTON, DOES RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS:
SECTION L The above findings are true and correct in all respects.
SECTION II. The final plat is hereby approved pertaining to the following described
real estate, to wit:
See Exhibit it"A" attached hereto and made a part hereof as if fully set forth
1
RESOLUTION NO.
iii
(The property, consisting of approximately 16.4'acres, is located
between Hoquiam Ave. NE and Jericho Ave NE and NE 2nd St. and SE 2nd Pl.)
Such plat is subject to the laws and ordinances of the City of Renton and subject to the findings,
conclusions and recommendation of the Planning/Building/Public Works Department dated
May 22, 2007.
PASSED BY THE CITY COUNCIL this day of , 2007.
Bonnie I. Walton, City Clerk
APPROVED BY THE MAYOR this day of , 2007.
Kathy Keolker, Mayor
Approved as to form:
Lawrence J. Warren, City Attorney
RES.1272:5/25/07:ch
2
EXHIBIT A
Legal Description
PARCEL A:
TRACT 25,BLACK LOAM FIVE ACRE TRACTS,ACCORDING TO THE PLAT THEREOF,RECORDED IN
VOLUME 12 OF PLATS,PAGE 101, IN KING COUNTY,WASHINGTON;
EXCEPT THE FOLLOWING DESCRIBED PARCEL
BEGINNING AT THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF SAID TRACT 25;
THENCE SOUTHERLY ALONG THE WEST UNE OF 144TM AVENUE SOUTHEAST,TO THE
SOUTHEAST CORNER OF SAID TRACT 25;
THENCE WESTERLY ALONG THE SOUTH UNE OF SAID TRACT A DISTANCE OF 207.00 FEET;
THENCE NORTHERLY AND PARALLEL WITH THE WEST UNE OF 144TH AVENUE SOUTHEAST,TO A
POINT LYING 140.00 FEET SOUTH OF THE NORTH UNE OF SAID TRACT 25;
THENCE WESTERLY ALONG A LINE PARALLEL TO THE NORTH UNE OF TRACT 25 A DISTANCE OF
48.00 FEET;
THENCE NORTHERLY AND PARALLEL TO THE WEST UNE OF 144TM AVENUE SOUTHEST,A
DISTANCE OF 140.00 FEET TO THE NORTH UNE OF SAID TRACT 25;
THENCE EASTERLY ALONG SAID NORTH UNE TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING.
(ALSO KNOWN AS A PORTION OF KING COUNTY LOT LINE ADJUSTMENT NUMBER S90M0088,
RECORDED UNDER RECORDING NUMBER 98040906134
PARCEL B: •
PARCEL C OF KING COUNTY LOT LINE ADJUSTMENT NUMBER S90M0088 AS RECORDED UNDER
RECORDING NUMBER 9804090613,IN KING COUNTY,WASHINGTON;
BEING A PORTION OF TRACT 25,BLACK LOAM FIVE ACRE TRACTS,ACCORDING TO THE PLAT
THEREOF,RECORDED IN VOLUME 12,OF PLATS,PAGE 101,IN KING COUNTY,WASHINGTON.
PARCEL C:
TRACTS 28 AND 29,BLACK LOAM FIVE ACRE TRACTS,ACCORDING TO THE PLAT THEREOF,
RECORDED IN VOLUME 12 OF PLATS,PAGE 101,IN KING COUNTY,WASHINGTON.
PARCEL D:
TRACT 32,BLACK LOAM FIVE ACRE TRACTS,ACCORDING TO THE PLAT THEREOF,RECORDED IN
VOLUME 12 OF PLATS,PAGE 101, IN KING COUNTY,J ASHINGTON.
sF
-..12_2:--4-1-9— 0 ill
MAY VALLE P z
rCOUNTY PARK "1% v
1 L_ <Rs, .
: : .± Q SE 116TH ST O
h SE 1S7TTH ZLo Lu
Q 0
W �.11111111 � z
Z Q
: 1, TH
201-
N O T
Q COALkE/L
o �% 124TH PARK
Z WI I� Q�
2 PARK
41
TO I 405 Q Q h co Q' de
RIDE
NE4THST
en
NE 2Np ST .ITE SE 132ND ST e.
Q. I PARK', SE 133RD CT I
RENTON o , 14? III
Ze -Q ON
SE 2ND P PARK I I
7 ^y r H V :rr,r f r. , �i s r ail: ,,.., . s JYI 32?3s17,
VICINITY MAP
NOT TO SCALE
19dopfPd
CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON
RESOLUTION NO. 387/
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON,
AUTHORIZING THE MAYOR AND CITY CLERK, TO ENTER INTO AN
INTERLOCAL AGREEMENT WITH KING COUNTY WATER
DISTRICT 90 RELATING TO THE TRANSFER OF SANITARY SEWER
MAINS, MANHOLES AND APPURTENANCES, FROM THE DISTRICT
TO THE CITY OF RENTON.
WHEREAS, the City of Renton provides public services, including water and sewer
service, within its prescribed area; and
WHEREAS, King County Water District 90 provides water service within its
prescribed area; and
WHEREAS, King County Water District 90 has owned sanitary sewer mains, manholes
and appurtenances, which exist in areas which are within the City's sewer service boundary, and
which can efficiently be managed, operated and maintained by the City of Renton in conjunction
with other facilities in the City; and
WHEREAS, it is in the public interest for the parties herein to enter into an agreement
to provide for the transfer of the sanitary sewer mains, manholes and appurtenances;
NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RENTON,
WASHINGTON, DOES RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS:
SECTION I. The above findings are true and correct in all respects.
SECTION U. The Mayor and City Clerk are hereby authorized, to enter into an
interlocal agreement with King County Water District 90, allowing for the transfer of sanitary
sewer mains, manholes and appurtenances to the City of Renton.
RESOLUTION NO.
PASSED BY THE CITY COUNCIL this day of , 2007.
Bonnie I. Walton, City Clerk
APPROVED BY THE MAYOR this day of , 2007.
Kathy Keolker, Mayor
Approved as to form:
Lawrence J. Warren, City Attorney
Date of Publication:
RES:1270:5/16/07:ch
2
C:\Documents and Settings\Mary Ann\My Documents\Winword\Res\1270.doc
t9dooh«l 4-V zoa7
CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON
RESOLUTION NO. 3e .Z
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON,
AUTHORIZING THE MAYOR AND CITY CLERK TO ENTER INTO AN
INTERLOCAL COOPERATIVE PURCHASING AGREEMENT WITH
THE CITY OF SEATTLE IN ORDER TO JOINTLY BID THE
ACQUISITION OF GOODS AND SERVICES, INCLUDING A TURNKEY
TRAFFIC SAFETY CAMERA SYSTEM.
WHEREAS, the Interlocal Cooperation Act, as amended, and codified in Chapter 39.34
of the Revised Code of Washington, provides for interlocal cooperation between government
agencies; and
WHEREAS, the cities of Renton and Seattle desire to use each other's procurement
agreements when it is in their mutual interest; and
WHEREAS, it is in the parties' mutual interest to jointly bid the acquisition of goods and
services where such mutual effort can be planned in advance, and to authorize the acquisition of
goods and services, and the purchase or acquisition of goods and services under contracts where a
price is extended by either party's bidder to other governmental agencies; and
WHEREAS,this Agreement shall allow the following activities:
A. Purchase or acquisition of goods and services by each party acting as agent for
either or both parties when agreed to in advance, in writing;
B. Purchase or acquisition of goods and services by each party where provision has
been provided in contracts for other governmental agencies to avail themselves of goods and
services offered under the contract and/or where either party's bidder is willing to extend prices to
other government agencies; and
1
RESOLUTION NO.
WHEREAS, each party reserves the right to contract independently for the acquisition of
goods and services without notice to the other party and shall not bind or otherwise obligate the
other party to participate in the activity; and
WHEREAS, under the Agreement, Renton and Seattle may purchase from either of each
others' contracts that were awarded based on a bid; and
WHEREAS, it is necessary to document the terms and conditions of the Interlocal
Cooperative Purchasing Agreement between the cities;
NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RENTON,
WASHINGTON, DOES RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS:
SECTION I. The above findings are true and correct in all respects.
SECTION H. The Mayor and City Clerk are authorized to enter into an Interlocal
Cooperative Purchasing Agreement with the City of Seattle in order to jointly bid the acquisition
of goods and services, including a turnkey traffic safety camera system.
PASSED BY THE CITY COUNCIL this day of , 2007.
Bonnie I. Walton, City Clerk
APPROVED BY THE MAYOR this day of , 2007.
Kathy Keolker, Mayor
Approved as to form:
Lawrence J. Warren, City Attorney
RES.1233:3/6/07:ma
2