Press Alt + R to read the document text or Alt + P to download or print.

No preview available

The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutCouncil 06/25/2007 AGENDA RENTON CITY COUNCIL REGULAR MEETING June 25, 2007 Monday, 7 p.m. 1. CALL TO ORDER AND PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE 2. ROLL CALL 3. SPECIAL PRESENTATIONS: a. Special Olympics Recognition b. Park Board Annual Report 4. ADMINISTRATIVE REPORT 5. AUDIENCE COMMENT (Speakers must sign up prior to the Council meeting. Each speaker is allowed five minutes. The comment period will be limited to one-half hour. The second audience comment period later on in the agenda is unlimited in duration.) When you are recognized by the Presiding Officer,please walk to the podium and state your name and address for the record, SPELLING YOUR LAST NAME. 6. CONSENT AGENDA The following items are distributed to Councilmembers in advance for study and review, and the recommended actions will be accepted in a single motion. Any item may be removed for further discussion if requested by a Councilmember. Loi a. Approval of Council meeting minutes of 6/18/2007. Council concur. b. Administrative,Judicial and Legal Services Department recommends adoption of a resolution accepting the Boundary Review Board-amended boundaries for the Benson Hill Communities Annexation, amending the ballot tile, and calling for King County to hold a special municipal election for placement on the 11/6/2007 ballot reflecting these changes. Refer to Committee of the Whole. c. Development Services Division recommends adoption of the following: 2006 International Code Series; 2006 Washington State Energy Code; 2006 Washington State Ventilation and Indoor Air Quality Code; 2006 International Plumbing Code; and 2005 National Electrical Code. Council concur. (See 9.b. for ordinance.) d. Economic Development,Neighborhoods and Strategic Planning Department submits 10%Notice of Intent to annex petition for the proposed Liberty Annexation, and recommends a public meeting be set on 7/9/2007 to consider the petition; 184.2 acres located in the vicinity of 156th Ave. SE and SE 144th St. Council concur. e. Economic Development,Neighborhoods and Strategic Planning Department recommends adoption of a resolution ratifying the 2006 amendments to the Growth Management Planning Council's Countywide Planning Policies. Council concur. (See 9.a. for resolution.) f. Transportation Systems Division recommends approval of an agreement in the amount of $29,294.10 with Teufel Nursery, Inc. for Oakesdale Ave. SW Wetland Phase I and II landscape maintenance. Council concur. g. Transportation Systems Division recommends approval of an agreement with Washington State Department of Transportation to accept funds in the amount of$44,355.10 for the Commute Trip Reduction program. Council concur. (See 9.b. for resolution.) h. Transportation Systems Division recommends approval of an agreement in the amount of $38,060 with King County Department of Transportation to provide Commute Trip Reduction services to 24 affected employers in the City of Renton for 2007-2008. Council concur. (See 9.c. for resolution.) (CONTINUED ON REVERSE SIDE) 4 1. Transportation:Systems Division requests authorization for the temporary closure of Rainier Ave. S. (8/10/2007-8/13/2007),Shattuck Ave. S. (8/1/2007-8/10/2007 & 8/13/2007-12/28/2007), and Hardie Ave. SW(8/13/2007-8/17/2007) at the BNSF railroad bridge crossings to construct the bridge replacements. Council concur. (See 9.d. for resolution.) ikopoi j. Utility Systems Division requests approval of the Surveying Services Roster, valid from July 2007 to July 2008, listing 11 professional land surveyors. Council concur. 7. CORRESPONDENCE 8. UNFINISHED BUSINESS Topics listed below were discussed in Council committees during the past week. Those topics marked with an asterisk(*)may include legislation. Committee reports on any topics may be held by the Chair if further review is necessary. a. Finance Committee: Vouchers; Utility Bill Adjustment Request from Renton Housing Authority b. Planning&Development Committee: Highlands Task Force; City Code Amendments re: R-4 Zone and Animal Regulations c. Transportation(Aviation)Committee: WSDOT Project Coordinator Agreement for I-405, I-5 to SR-169 Stage 1 Widening Project*, d. Utilities Committee: SW 34th St. Culvert Replacement Project Fund Transfer* 9. RESOLUTIONS AND ORDINANCES Resolutions: a. Countywide Planning Policies 2006 amendments(see 6.e.) b. WSDOT grant for Commute Trip Reduction program(see 6.g.) c. Agreement with King County for Commute Trip Reduction services (see 6.h.) d. Temporary closure of Rainier Ave. S., Shattuck Ave. S., and Hardie Ave. SW(see 6.i.) e. WSDOT agreement re: coordinator for I-405, I-5 to SR-169 Stage 1 Widening Project(see 8.c.) 1/40100, Ordinances for first reading: a. 2007 Budget amendment for SW 34th St. Culvert Replacement Project(see 8.d.) b. State, national, and international standard codes (see 6.c.) Ordinances for second and final reading: a. Approving the Aster Park Annexation(1st reading 6/18/2007) b. Establishing R-4 zoning(originally King County R-4 zoning) for 12.17 acres of the Aster Park Annexation area(1st reading 6/18/2007) c. Establishing R-4 zoning(originally King County R-48 zoning) for six acres of the Aster Park Annexation area(I st reading 6/18/2007) 10. NEW BUSINESS (Includes Council Committee agenda topics; call 425-430-6512 for recorded information.) 11. AUDIENCE COMMENT 12. ADJOURNMENT 1/46101 • (CONTINUED ON NEXT PAGE) 1/4111101 COMMITTEE OF THE WHOLE AGENDA (Preceding Council Meeting) Council Conference Room 5:30 p.m. Emerging Issues in Planning/Building/Public Works Department Council Chambers Approximately 6 p.m. Benson Hill Communities Annexation Transition Plan • Hearing assistance devices for use in the Council Chambers are available upon request to the City Clerk • CITY COUNCIL MEETINGS ARE TELEVISED LIVE ON GOVERNMENT ACCESS CHANNEL 21 AND ARE RE-CABLECAST TUES.&THURS.AT 11 AM&9 PM,WED.&FRI.AT 9 AM&7 PM AND SAT.&SUN.AT 1 PM&9 PM RENTON CITY COUNCIL Regular Meeting June 25, 2007 Council Chambers Monday, 7 p.m. MINUTES Renton City Hall CALL TO ORDER Mayor Pro Tern Toni Nelson called the meeting of the Renton City Council to order and led the Pledge of Allegiance to the flag. ROLL CALL OF TONI NELSON, Council President; RANDY CORMAN; DON PERSSON; COUNCILMEMBERS MARCIE PALMER; TERRI BRIERE; DENIS LAW, Council President Pro Tem; DAN CLAWSON. CITY STAFF IN LAWRENCE J. WARREN, City Attorney; BONNIE WALTON, City Clerk; ATTENDANCE GREGG ZIMMERMAN, Planning/Building/Public Works Administrator; ROBERT HANSON, Transportation Design Supervisor; LESLIE BETLACH, Parks Director; GERALD RERECICH, Recreation Director; ALEX PIETSCH, Economic Development Administrator; DEPUTY CHIEF CHUCK DUFFY, Fire Department; MARTY WINE, Assistant CAO; COMMANDER FLOYD ELDRIDGE, Police Department. SPECIAL Recreation Director Rerecich announced that the Washington State Special PRESENTATIONS Olympics finals in track, soccer, and cycling recently took place at Fort Lewis. Community Services: Special He pointed out that 87 athletes represented Renton in those sports. Each athlete Olympics Athlete Recognition who was present at the meeting introduced himself, and identified the sport(s) in which he participated, as well as how he placed in his event(s). Community Services: Park Parks Director Betlach explained that Renton's Park Board identifies and Board Annual Report examines future trends,participates in the planning process, and recommends courses of action to meet existing park and recreation needs. She introduced the Park Board members present in the audience, and invited Chair Tim Searing to present the Park Board Annual Report(April 2006 - May 2007). Mr. Searing stated that new Community Services Administrator Terry Higashiyama has provided guidance and insight to the Park Board's decision making process. He reported that over the past year, the Park Board has redesigned the meeting agenda format, filled two vacancies, and started to move the monthly meetings out into the community. Key highlights included: Community Services Department re-accreditation and updated strategic plan, Tri-Park Master Plan adoption by Council, Heritage Park naming and dedication, and the new restaurant vendor at Maplewood Golf Course. In conclusion, Mr. Searing thanked the Mayor and Council for supporting the Park Board and stressed how important open space, trails, and active parks are for the community. ADMINISTRATIVE Assistant CAO Wine reviewed a written administrative report summarizing the REPORT City's recent progress towards goals and work programs adopted as part of its business plan for 2007 and beyond. Items noted included: * Nominations for the 2007 Renton Citizen of the Year program are being accepted through August 31. Removal or pruning of 15 large trees surrounding Carco Theatre begins this week in order to improve visibility and reduce building maintenance costs resulting from the intense shading of the closely spaced trees. * Washington State Department of Transportation has opened bids for Stage 1 of the I-405 widening project, which involves the portion of 1-405 June 25,2007 Renton City Council Minutes Page 219 extending from the Renton/Tukwila boundary to the SR-167 interchange. Work begins July 2,with some construction occurring in the Oakesdale vicinity in August and the overall project is expected to be completed by the end of 2009. AUDIENCE COMMENT Dave McCammon, 17221 125th Ave. SE, Renton, 98058, encouraged Council Citizen Comment: McCammon to support the Benson Hill Communities Annexation, and announced that the - Benson Hill Communities Benson Hill Communities Progress Group will hold an open public information Annexation, S 200th St& meeting on the proposed annexation at Renton Park Elementary School on July 128th Ave SE 19, from 6:30 p.m. to 8:30 p.m. CONSENT AGENDA Items on the consent agenda are adopted by one motion which follows the listing. At the request of Councilmembers, items 6.d. and 6.i. were removed for separate consideration. Council Meeting Minutes of Approval of Council meeting minutes of 6/18/2007. Council concur. 6/18/2007 Annexation: Benson Hill Administrative, Judicial and Legal Services Department recommended adoption Communities, S 200th St& of a resolution accepting the Boundary Review Board-amended boundaries for 128th Ave SE the Benson Hill Communities Annexation, amending the ballot title, and calling for King County to hold a special municipal election for placement on the 11/6/2007 ballot reflecting these changes. Refer to Committee of the Whole. Development Services: Development Services Division recommended adoption of the following: 2006 Standard Codes Adoption International Code Series; 2006 Washington State Energy Code; 2006 Washington State Ventilation and Indoor Air Quality Code; 2006 International Plumbing Code; and 2005 National Electrical Code. Council concur. (See page 222 for ordinance.) Planning: 2006 Countywide Economic Development,Neighborhoods and Strategic Planning Department Planning Policies Amendments recommended adoption of a resolution ratifying the 2006 amendments to the Growth Management Planning Council's Countywide Planning Policies. Council concur. (See page 222 for resolution.) Transportation: Oakesdale Ave Transportation Systems Division recommended approval of an agreement in the SW Wetland Ph I & II amount of$29,294.10 with Teufel Nursery, Inc. for Oakesdale Ave. SW Landscape Maintenance, Wetland Phase I and II landscape maintenance. Council concur. Teufel Nursery Transportation: Commute Trip Transportation Systems Division recommended approval of an agreement with Reduction Program Grant, Washington State Department of Transportation to accept funds in the amount WSDOT of$44,355.10 for the Commute Trip Reduction program. Council concur. (See page 222 for resolution.) Transportation: Commute Trip Transportation Systems Division recommended approval of an agreement in the Reduction Program Services, amount of$38,060 with King County Department of Transportation to provide King County Commute Trip Reduction services to 24 affected employers in the City of Renton for 2007-2008. Council concur. (See page 222 for resolution.) Utility: Surveying Services Utility Systems Division recommended approval of the Surveying Services Roster, 2007-2008 Roster,valid from July 2007 to July 2008, listing 11 professional land surveyors. Council concur. MOVED BY LAW, SECONDED BY CLAWSON, COUNCIL APPROVE THE CONSENT AGENDA AS AMENDED TO REMOVE ITEMS 6.d. AND 6.i. FOR SEPARATE CONSIDERATION. CARRIED. 1 June 25,2007 Renton City Council Minutes Page 220 Separate Consideration Transportation Systems Division requested authorization for the temporary Item 6.i. closure of Rainier Ave. S. (5 a.m. 8/11/2007 to 10 p.m. 8/15/2007), Shattuck Streets: Rainier Ave S & Ave. S. (8/1/2007 to 8/10/2007 and 8/16/2007 to 12/28/2007), and Hardie Ave. Shattuck Ave S &Hardie Ave SW (8/16/2007 to 8/20/2007) at the BNSF railroad bridge crossings for SW Closures for RR Bridge construction of the bridge replacements. Replacements At the request for more information by Councilmember Palmer, Planning/Building/Public Works Administrator Zimmerman stated that BNSF Railway is replacing railroad bridges over Rainier Ave. S., Shattuck Ave. S., and Hardie Ave. SW. Construction is scheduled to begin 8/1/2007 and end 12/28/2007. He reviewed the Hardie Ave. SW and Shattuck Ave. S. temporary closure dates. Turning to Rainier Ave. S.,Mr. Zimmerman explained that the railroad bridge is not wide enough to accommodate the future street improvements, and the bridge replacement involves removal of a massive central abutment in order to improve left turn capability. He indicated that the abutment was initially to be removed over one weekend,working 24 hours a day; however, the Transportation (Aviation) Committee members expressed concern regarding the effect of the 24-hour noise on nearby residents. Mr. Zimmerman said the revised Rainier Ave. S. closure proposal does not involve any nighttime work. Instead, the road would be closed from 5 a.m. on August 11 to 10 p.m. on August 15, with construction occurring from 7 a.m. to 10 p.m. over the weekend of August 11 and 12. Responding to Council inquiries,Mr. Zimmerman stated that the effect of a weekend closure on businesses depended upon the type of business, and he assured that the City will inform businesses of the street closure revision. He noted that the project will not benefit from any nighttime work and confirmed that if the abutment is removed faster than predicted, the road will open sooner. Mr. Zimmerman indicated that two signed detour routes will be present during the closure. Transportation Design Supervisor Hanson confirmed that traffic signals on the detour routes and other intersections will be set to accommodate the change in traffic flow. Councilmember Persson noted the cost savings to the City of$2 million by having BNSF replace the bridge in this manner, and he further noted that additional police officers will be assigned to the area during the road closure. In response to Councilmember Clawson's inquiry, Mr. Hanson stated that signs will be posted one month prior to the closures. Councilmember Palmer pointed out that the Summer Construction Projects page on the City's website contains valuable information, and she encouraged the public to periodically review the page to keep apprised of the many projects occurring this summer. Mayor Pro Tern Nelson suggested the distribution of informational fliers close to when the road closure will occur to remind businesses of the upcoming event. Councilmember Corman suggested that during the community outreach regarding this project, the City make clear that the bridge replacements will help improve the Rainier Corridor in the long run. MOVED BY BRIERE, SECONDED BY PALMER, COUNCIL APPROVE CONSENT AGENDA ITEM 6.i. AS PRESENTED. CARRIED. (See page 222 for resolution.) June 25,2007 Renton City Council Minutes Page 221 Separate Consideration Economic Development,Neighborhoods and Strategic Planning Department Item 6.d. submitted 10%Notice of Intent to annex petition for the proposed Liberty Annexation: Liberty, 156th Annexation, and recommended a public meeting be set on 7/9/2007 to consider Ave SE & SE 144th St the petition; 184.2 acres located in the vicinity of 156th Ave. SE and SE 144th St. MOVED BY BRIERE, SECONDED BY CORMAN, COUNCIL: APPROVE CONSENT AGENDA ITEM 6.d. AS PRESENTED; REQUIRE PUBLIC MEETING NOTIFICATION TO SURROUNDING PROPERTY OWNERS WITHIN 300 FEET OF THE ANNEXATION AREA AND TO NEIGHBORING SUBDIVISIONS; AND REFER THE ISSUE OF ANNEXATION NOTIFICATION PRACTICES TO THE PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT COMMITTEE. CARRIED. UNFINISHED BUSINESS Finance Committee Chair Persson presented a report recommending approval of Finance Committee Claim Vouchers 260800 - 261330 and two wire transfers totaling Finance: Vouchers $5,829,452.48; and approval of 262 Payroll Vouchers, zero wire transfers, and 673 direct deposits totaling$2,199,304.10. MOVED BY PERSSON, SECONDED BY LAW, COUNCIL CONCUR IN THE COMMITTEE REPORT. CARRIED. Finance: Utility Bill Finance Committee Chair Persson presented a report regarding the request for Adjustment, Renton Housing utility bill adjustment from the Renton Housing Authority. Due to two separate Authority leaks that took some time to locate,the Renton Housing Authority requested an adjustment to their utility bills in the amount of$14,158.35. The Committee recommended concurrence in the staff recommendation and approves the request of the Renton dousing Authority. MOVED BY PERSSON, SECONDED BY LAW, COUNCIL CONCUR IN THE COMMITTEE REPORT. CARRIED. Transportation (Aviation) Transportation (Aviation) Committee Chair Palmer presented a report Committee recommending concurrence in the staff recommendation to authorize the Mayor Transportation: I-405, (I-5 to and City Clerk to execute a cooperative agreement with the Washington State SR-169) Stage 1 Widening, Department of Transportation for a City of Renton project coordinator for the I- WSDOT 405, 1-5 to SR-169 Stage 1 Widening Project. The Committee further recommended that the resolution regarding this matter be presented for reading and adoption. MOVED BY PALMER, SECONDED BY BRIERE, COUNCIL CONCUR IN THE COMMITTEE REPORT. CARRIED. (See page 222 for resolution.) Planning& Development Planning and Development Committee Chair Briere presented a report Committee recommending concurrence in the staff recommendation to approve the animals, Planning: City Code Amends cluster, and design ordinance. The Committee further recommended that the re R-4 Zone & Animal ordinance be prepared for first reading. MOVED BY BRIERE, SECONDED Regulations BY CLAWSON, COUNCIL CONCUR IN THE COMMITTEE REPORT. CARRIED. Planning: City Code Amends Responding to Councilmember Corman's inquiry, Economic Development re Tree Retention Administrator Pietsch stated that the tree retention ordinance, which was reported out of Planning and Development Committee on 6/11/2007, affects every zone throughout the City. Utilities Committee Utilities Committee Chair Clawson presented a report recommending Utility: SW 34th St Culvert concurrence in the staff recommendation to transfer$150,000 to the 2007 SW Replacement Project Fund 34th St. Culvert Replacement Project budget from the Surface Water Utility's Transfer,Budget Amend approved 2007 budget for the Lake Ave. S./Rainier Ave. S. Storm System Replacement Capital Improvement Program project. The Committee further June 25,2007 Renton City Council Minutes Page 222 recommended that the ordinance amending the 2007 Budget be presented for first reading. MOVED BY CLAWSON, SECONDED BY BRIERE, COUNCIL CONCUR IN THE COMMITTEE REPORT. CARRIED. (See page 222 for ordinance.) RESOLUTIONS AND The following resolutions were presented for reading and adoption: ORDINANCES Resolution #3886 A resolution was read ratifying amendments to the Countywide Planning Planning: 2006 Countywide Policies. MOVED BY BRIERE, SECONDED BY CORMAN, COUNCIL Planning Policies Amendments ADOPT THE RESOLUTION AS READ. CARRIED. Resolution#3887 A resolution was read authorizing the Mayor and City Clerk to enter into an Transportation: Commute Trip interlocal cooperative agreement with the Washington State Department of Reduction Program Grant, Transportation authorizing release of State funds in the amount of$44,355.10 WSDOT for implementation of the Citywide Commute Trip Reduction program. MOVED BY CORMAN, SECONDED BY PALMER, COUNCIL ADOPT THE RESOLUTION AS READ. CARRIED. Resolution #3888 A resolution was read authorizing the Mayor and City Clerk to enter into an Transportation: Commute Trip agreement with King County for implementation of the Citywide Commute Trip Reduction Program Services, Reduction program in the amount of$38,060 to support activities of the City of King County Renton as required under the State of Washington Commute Trip Reduction Law. MOVED BY CORMAN, SECONDED BY PALMER, COUNCIL ADOPT THE RESOLUTION AS READ. CARRIED. Resolution#3889 A resolution was read authorizing the temporary street closures of Shattuck Streets: Rainier Ave S & Ave. S., Rainier Ave. S., and Hardie Ave. SW. MOVED BY LAW, Shattuck Ave S & Hardie Ave SECONDED BY CORMAN, COUNCIL ADOPT THE RESOLUTION AS SW Closures for RR Bridge AMENDED TO CORRECT THE FOLLOWING UNDER SECTION II: Replacements CHANGE THE RAINIER AVENUE CLOSURE DATE TO STATE "August 11, 2007,to August 15, 2007," AND CHANGE THE WORDS "The Mayor and City Clerk" TO "The City Council." CARRIED. Resolution #3890 A resolution was read authorizing the Mayor and City Clerk to enter into an Transportation: 1-405, (I-5 to interlocal cooperative agreement with the Washington State Department of SR-169) Stage 1 Widening, Transportation concerning funding of a project coordinator for the I-405, I-5 to WSDOT SR-169 Stage 1 Widening Project. MOVED BY PALMER, SECONDED BY PERSSON, COUNCIL ADOPT THE RESOLUTION AS READ. CARRIED. The following ordinances were presented for first reading and referred to the Council meeting of 7/2/2007 for second and final reading: Utility: SW 34th St Culvert An ordinance was read amending the 2007 Budget by transferring$150,000 Replacement Project Fund from the Lake Ave. S./Rainier Ave. S. Storm System Replacement Project Transfer, Budget Amend expenditure account to the SW 34th St. Culvert Replacement Project expenditure account. MOVED BY CLAWSON, SECONDED BY BRIERE, COUNCIL REFER THE ORDINANCE FOR SECOND AND FINAL READING ON 7/2/2007. CARRIED. Development Services: An ordinance was read amending Sections 4-5-040, 4-5-050, 4-5-055,4-5-090, Standard Codes Adoption 4-5-100, and 4-5-110 and adding Section 4-5-051 of Chapter 5, Building and Fire Prevention Standards, of Title IV(Development Regulations) of City Code by adopting the 2006 International Building, Residential, Mechanical,The Washington State Energy Code, and Fuel Gas Codes; the 2005 National Electrical Code,the 2006 Washington State Ventilation and Indoor Air Quality June 25,2007 Renton City Council Minutes Page 223 Code, and the 2006 Uniform Plumbing Code, and amendments thereto. MOVED BY BRIERE, SECONDED BY CLAWSON, COUNCIL REFER THE ORDINANCE FOR SECOND AND FINAL READING ON 7/2/2007. CARRIED. The following ordinances were presented for second and final reading and adoption: Ordinance#5293 An ordinance was read annexing approximately 19.85 acres of property located Annexation: Aster Park,NE immediately south of NE Sunset Blvd. and immediately west of 148th Ave. SE Sunset Blvd (Aster Park Annexation). MOVED BY LAW, SECONDED BY BRIERE, COUNCIL ADOPT THE ORDINANCE AS READ. ROLL CALL: ALL AYES. CARRIED. Ordinance#5294 An ordinance was read establishing the zoning classification for approximately Annexation: Aster Park, R-4 12.17 acres located immediately south of the south side of NE Sunset Blvd. on Zoning(12.17 Acres) the north, west of the west side of 148th Ave. SE, and north of the midpoint of SE 112th St., if extended,on the south, from R-4 (Urban Residential - four dwelling units per acre,King County zoning) to R-4(Residential - four dwelling units per acre, Renton zoning); Aster Park Annexation. MOVED BY LAW, SECONDED BY BRIERE, COUNCIL ADOPT THE ORDINANCE AS READ. ROLL CALL: ALL AYES. CARRIED. Ordinance#5295 An ordinance was read establishing the zoning classification for approximately Annexation: Aster Park, R-4 six acres located immediately south of the south side of NE Sunset Blvd. on the Zoning (6 Acres) north, west of the new Aster Park Subdivision, and north of the midpoint of SE 112th St., if extended, on the south, from R-48 (Urban Residential - 48 dwelling units per acre, King County zoning) to R-4(Residential - four dwelling units per acre, Renton zoning);Aster Park Annexation. MOVED BY LAW, SECONDED BY BRIERE, COUNCIL ADOPT THE ORDINANCE AS READ. ROLL CALL: ALL AYES. CARRIED. NEW BUSINESS MOVED BY PERSSON, SECONDED BY CORMAN, COUNCIL REFER Court Case: Scoccolo THE COST OF THE SCOCCOLO LAWSUIT TO THE FINANCE Construction, CRT-98-008 COMMITTEE. CARRIED. Council: Positions on Regional Pointing out that many Councilmembers are involved with regional boards or Matters other organizations, Councilmember Clawson stated that he is interested in what everyone is doing. He noted that any discussion regarding what position a Councilmember is going to take on an issue and then present to the affected board should take place at a public meeting such as Committee of the Whole. Mr. Clawson asked the Council President to determine a way to implement this type of discussion process. Mayor Pro Tern Nelson indicated that Committee of the Whole is an appropriate venue for that type of discussion. Councilmember Clawson emphasized that the Council has the ability to influence regional decisions especially when teamed up with other cities. EXECUTIVE SESSION MOVED BY LAW, SECONDED BY CORMAN, COUNCIL RECESS INTO AND ADJOURNMENT EXECUTIVE SESSION FOR APPROXIMATELY 30 MINUTES TO DISCUSS LITIGATION WITH NO OFFICIAL ACTION TO BE TAKEN AND THAT THE COUNCIL MEETING BE ADJOURNED WHEN THE EXECUTIVE SESSION IS ADJOURNED. CARRIED. Time: 8:12 p.m. Executive session was conducted. There was no action taken. The executive session and the Council meeting adjourned at 8:47 p.m. June 25,2007 Renton City Council Minutes Page 224 le`7f4-uAj J. Ccia-1617,- Bonnie I. Walton, CMC, City Clerk Recorder: Michele Neumann June 25, 2007 RENTON CITY COUNCIL COMMITTEE MEETING CALENDAR Office of the City Clerk COUNCIL COMMITTEE MEETINGS SCHEDULED AT CITY COUNCIL MEETING June 25, 2007 COMMITTEE/CHAIRMAN DATE/TIME AGENDA COMMITTEE OF THE WHOLE MON., 7/02 Renton Trails and Bicycle Draft Plan; (Nelson) 5:30 p.m. Benson Hill Communities Annexation Transition Plan COMMUNITY SERVICES MON., 7/02 CANCELLED (Corman) FINANCE (Persson) PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT (Briere) PUBLIC SAFETY MON., 7/02 CANCELLED (Law) TRANSPORTATION (AVIATION) FRI., 6/29 Field Trip to The Landing (Palmer) 12 p.m. *Meet at Fry's Parking Lot* UTILITIES (Clawson) NOTE: Committee of the Whole meetings are held in.the Council Chambers unless otherwise noted. All other committee meetings are held in the Council Conference Room unless otherwise noted. RECEivEd JUN 2 1 2007 June 25, 2007 RENTON Cny COUNCii Mayor Kathy Keolker Toni Nelson, City Council President Members of the Renton City Council 1055 South Grady Way Renton, WA 98057 REF: ANNUAL REPORT Dear Mayor Keolker, Council President Nelson and Councilmembers; It has been a long time since the Park Board has presented an Annual Report to the Mayor and City Council. We are pleased to be here tonight and also excited about what we have been involved in over the past year (April 2006-May 2007). Quite a lot has changed and improved this last year. The most significant change is the return of Terry Higashiyama to the City, now serving as Administrator of Community Services and liaison to the Park Board. Prior to Terry, we were a "rubber stamp" board approving picnics and weddings in the parks. Terry has led us in substantive assistance in decision making for our Parks (see below). When Terry came on board as the new Community Services Administrator, we were in the middle of the Tri-Park Master Plan review and naming of the Heritage Park. We were dealing with the loss of Marge Richter and had an additional vacancy to fill with the resignation of Ralph Evans. Terry provided the guidance and insight to help with these decisions and much more. We feel fortunate and confident with Terry's return to Community Services the Board will make significant contributions this next year. Since our role is to support the Community Services Department, Mayor and Council by serving as a connection to our community, it was important to regroup and realign ourselves under Terry's guidance. She was up to the task. Over the past year, we have: ❑ Redesigned our agenda format ❑ Filled two vacancies on the Board (Larry Reymann and Al Dieckman) ❑ Attended a Board and Commission training held in September of 2006 ❑ Reviewed traffic concerns through the Community Center to Maple Valley Highway ❑ Had numerous City staff presentations to the Board including: • Peter Hahn, Deputy PBPW Administrator, on transportation projects • Mary Wine, Assistant Chief Administrative Officer, on annexation issues • Mike Bailey, Finance Administrator, on budget issues is\sandy2007\pbannu alreport.doc Kathy Keolker,Mayor Councilmembers Annual Report June 25,2007 Page 2 of 3 • Karen Bergsvik, Human Services Manager, and Commander Katie McClincy on homelessness in Renton (related to park concerns) and • Fire Chief Daniels on Emergency Preparedness We have also begun to move our monthly meetings out to the Community. We have met at the Museum, Emergency Operations Center, and in July we will meet at the Highlands Community Center. Alternating sites will provide us with an opportunity to be more visible and involve the greater community in our common goals. The Board has had two field trips to review open space, capital projects, and recreational improvements. We will be adding an intense educational process to look at all current properties and facilities to better support future budget requests. We want to make sure that current inventory is at the top standard, while protecting properties for future generations. Other key highlights this year include: • The Community Services Department re-accreditation and the updated Strategic Plan • The Tri-Park Master Plan adoption by Council • Naming of Heritage Park and opening dedication • New vendor for restaurant at Maplewood Golf Course • Formation of Sub-Committee to update Park Rules and Regulations, (which we hope to present to you within the next couple months) • Support of art work at Henry Moses Aquatic Center, refurbishing of the dolphin, new art work at Heritage Park. (These were overseen by the Arts Commission and add a good deal to the citizens of Renton.) One disappointment we experienced was the delay of the Sam Chastain Trail connection. We do hope that with continued education and communication this trail will be completed in the near future. The value to the community is immeasurable. Staff has instituted a monthly Project Status Report that assists us by staying connected and aware of all that is going on in the Department. We saw a great benefit to the interaction with other boards and commissions within the Community Services Department through our retreat with all other community service boards in the fall of 2006 as well as other departments. We want to take this opportunity to thank the Mayor and Council for your on- going support. We find ourselves at the vortex of changing demographics in the City, the addition of new residents through annexation, and ever increasing i:\sandy2007\pbannualreport.do c Kathy Keolker,Mayor Councilmembers Annual Report June 25,2007 Page 3 of 3 property prices. Needless to say, there is a lot to do. The value of open space, trails, and active parks, as well as facilities to our constituents has never been more important. A current study by the Trust for Public Lands Title A "The Health Benefits of Parks" gave three strong reasons for the importance of our parks: Parks support physical activity for health Parks and Greenways increase health in newer communities Benefits of Parks and Greenways support psychological and social health The final paragraph of the executive summary states "Parks increase social capital", that is when people work together in a community garden or to create a park from a vacant lot. They get to know one another, trust one another, and look out for one another. It is amazing (when I look back) how far we have come in the last 12 months. While, what we have is wonderful, we must continue to improve what we have without diluting or changing what we are or our importance to our community. The accomplishment of creating a new park helps people to believe that they can affect change. We look forward to working with you in the next year. The Citizens of Renton deserve to have the best parks and recreation system and we are proud to be a part of making that a reality. i:\sandy2007\pbannualreport.doc Parks Commission Annual Report--2007 Signature Sheet 1 , \! Tim Searing, Chair Cynthia Burns Ron Regis I J / /v Al Dieckman Lar 'Town / 6./ZJe (0/i471-U-6 Mike O'Donin ro -str $Y O� ADMINISTRATIVE, JUDICIAL, AND • r% , LEGAL SERVICES DEPARTMENT 'e.P.�61— MEMORANDUM DATE: June 25, 2007 TO: Toni Nelson, Council President Members of the Renton City Council FROM: Kathy Keolker, Mayor Jay Covington, Chief Administrative Officer SUBJECT: Administrative Report In addition to our day-to-day activities, the following items are worthy of note for this week: GENERAL INFORMATION • Do you know someone who promotes and supports Renton? Someone who is dedicated to making the Renton community a great place to live, work, play, and learn? Here's your chance to recognize that special person for their commitment to Renton. Nominations for the 2007 Renton Citizen of the Year program are being accepted through August 31st. Pick up a nomination form at the Renton Chamber of Commerce, City libraries, or Renton Community Center. Applications may be downloaded by visiting the Spotlight section of the City's website at www.rentonwa.gov. COMMUNITY SERVICES DEPARTMENT • Renton Teen Camp, Itty Bitty Camp, Kidz Kaleidoscope and Sum-R-Craze Day Camps are getting underway. For information on availability of these programs, call the Renton Community Center at 425-430-6700 or visit www.rentonwa.gov. • Removal or pruning of 15 large trees surrounding Carco Theatre will begin this week in order to improve visibility and reduce building maintenance costs resulting from the intense shading of the closely spaced trees. Five trees will be removed that are growing just a few feet from the building and too close to other adjacent trees. The remaining 10 trees will be pruned away from the building. • The Henry Moses Aquatic Center will be open regular operating hours beginning June 26th. Three different leisure swim times are available, as well as swim lessons, water walking, lap swimming, and water fitness programs. For information and a complete schedule, call 425-430-6780 or visit www.rentonwa.gov. • The Coulon Family Concert Series begins June 27th with Renton City Concert Band kicking off this summer's entertainment schedule. Enjoy free entertainment at Gene Coulon Memorial Beach Park every Wednesday at 7:00 p.m. through August 15th. For more information, call the Renton Community Center at 425-430-6700 or visit www.rentonwa.gov for the complete summer line-up. • Summerfest 2007 offers free drop-in recreation programs for children ages 6 to 12 at five neighborhood parks from 10:00 a.m. to 6:00 p.m., Monday through Friday, June 27th through August 24th. Summerfest features great games, creative crafts, crazy contests, and much more. For more information and a list of locations, call 425-430-6700 or visit www.rentonwa.gov. Administrative Report June 25, 2007 Page 2 • The City of Renton Management Association has donated $1,250 to the City of Renton Recreation Scholarship Program. The scholarships offer low-income families and individuals of all ages to participate in recreation programs they would not normally be able to afford. The opportunities are endless for both young and old to participate in arts and crafts, fitness, sports, day camps, science, dance, music, and computer classes. Scholarship applications are available at www.rentonwa.gov or at the Renton Community Center. For more information call 425-430-6700. ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT, NEIGHBORHOODS & STRATEGIC PLANNING DEPARTMENT • Neighborhood picnic season is underway! The Tiffany Park Neighborhood Association, which includes Ponderosa Estates and Tiffany Park Homeowners Association, will hold its annual neighborhood picnic this Wednesday, June 27th, from 5:30 to 8:00 p.m. at Tiffany Park, located at 1902 Lake Young's Way SE. The Windwood Homeowners Association will hold its neighborhood picnic this Thursday, June 28th, from 5:30 to 8:00 p.m. in their neighborhood common area, located at Rosario Avenue close to the NE 4th Street entrance. Residents are encouraged to bring their favorite potluck dish and attend their designated picnic to get to know their immediate and surrounding neighbors and meet City representatives. FINANCE & INFORMATION SERVICES DEPARTMENT • City of Renton senior and/or disabled citizens may qualify for the City utility tax rebate and discount program. Utility tax rebates are available to any qualified resident who paid utility taxes during the year. The rebate is for $110, or prorated for residence of less than one year. Applications are due June 30th and are available at City Hall or online at www.rentonwa.gov. Call 425-430-6852 for further information. PLANNING/BUILDING/PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT • The City has begun construction on the SW 34th Street Culvert Replacement Project, which will reduce flooding in the Renton Valley by replacing four deteriorating, undersized culverts. Southwest 34th Street (on the east and west side of the creek) is temporarily closed to through traffic in order to facilitate removal of the existing culverts and installation of the new box culvert. The temporary road closure will shorten construction time by approximately three weeks, resulting in fewer impacts to neighboring businesses and traffic, as well as reducing construction costs. Local access to businesses on both sides of SW 34th Street will be maintained at all times. The closure will remain in effect 24 hours a day through September 30th. Questions or concerns may be directed to Allen Quynn, Project Manager, at 425-430-7247. • WSDOT has opened bids for Stage 1 of the I-405 widening project, which involves the portion of 1-405 extending from the Renton/Tukwila boundary to the SR 167 interchange. Work will begin on this major project July 2nd, with some construction occurring in the Oakesdale vicinity in August and the overall project expected to be complete by the end of 2009. 1 tR CITY OF RENTON COUNCIL AGENDA BILL AI#: p tsP Submitting Data: For Agenda of: June 25 Dept/Div/Board.. Administrative, Legal & Judicial Services Staff Contact Marty Wine, Asst. CAO (x6526) Agenda Status Consent X Subject: Public Hearing.. Amending annexation area boundaries and amending Correspondence.. the ballot title for the election requested on November 6 Ordinance to be set by King County for the Benson Hill Resolution X Communities Annexation Old Business Exhibits: New Business Issue Paper Study Sessions Resolution 3863 Information Resolution/amended legal description Recommended Action: Approvals: Refer to Committee of the Whole Legal Dept X Finance Dept Other Fiscal Impact: Expenditure Required... Transfer/Amendment Amount Budgeted Revenue Generated Total Project Budget City Share Total Project.. SUMMARY OF ACTION: Under State law, the Renton City Council has 30 days from the time the Boundary Review Board transmits their record of decision to request an annexation election date from King County. The City requested an election date for the Benson Hill Communities by Resolution 3863, adopted on March 12, 2007. This resolution amends the boundaries of the Benson Hill Communities annexation area to reflect the Boundary Review Board-adopted boundaries, and also amends the ballot title to reflect the boundary change. The resolution would correct these items with King County, who has been requested by Renton to hold a municipal election to consider the annexation of the Benson Hill Communities on November 6, 2007. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Approve a resolution accepting the Boundary Review Board-amended boundaries for the Benson Hill Communities annexation, amending the ballot title, and calling for King County to hold a special municipal election for placement on the November 6, 2007 election ballot reflecting these changes. Rentonnet/agnbill/ bh ti`SY O ADMINISTRATIVE, JUDICIAL, AND ;; ® , LEGAL SERVICES DEPARTMENT • MEMORANDUM DATE: June 25, 2007 TO: Toni Nelson, Council President Members, Renton City Council VIA: J.y Kathy Keolker, Mayor FROM: r Marty Wine, Assistant Chief Administrative Officer STAFF CONTACT: Rebecca Lind, Planning Manager, EDNSP SUBJECT: Benson Hill Communities Annexation Election ISSUE: Should the City Council amend the boundaries and ballot title for the City's request that King County call a special municipal election to consider the annexation of the Benson Hill Communities in November, 2007? 'toe If yes, Council has 30 days from the time of the Boundary Review Board's record of decision transmittal to request an election date from King County. The City will receive the BRB decision during the week of June 18. RECOMMENDATION: Amend the council-approved Resolution 3863 calling for King County to hold a special municipal election for placement on the November 6, 2007 election ballot, to reflect amended boundaries and ballot title. The rationale for this recommendation is as follows: • The City Council accepted the Benson Hill Communities progress group's petition to annex on March 12, 2007. The group gathered nearly twice the signatures of registered voters needed to request annexation to the City. Moving the decision on to an election is consistent with City policy to welcome areas with the desire to annex to be able to vote on the question. • As will be shown in a Committee of the Whole briefing scheduled for June 25 and July 2, Renton will be able to manage the fiscal impacts and costs of the annexation using revenues generated in the area, and assistance from the state sales tax credit on the short term. It is possible that if the City and County ratify an interlocal agreement, some King County Annexation Initiative funding could also be available to assist with one-time transition costs related to the annexation. In either case, the Administration is planning for an effective date of the Council President Toni Nelson Page 2 of 3 June 18,2007 annexation of March 1, 2007 so that five months of lead time (for hiring, training, *104/ purchasing) is available for the City to prepare for a large annexation if voters of the area choose to annex. Councilmembers will have an opportunity to discuss transition planning at Committee of the Whole meetings over the next few weeks. • A jointly-funded City and County survey shows that residents are today largely undecided or supportive of annexation, but aware that an annexation effort is underway. Requesting an election will allows residents to choose or not choose annexation and to continue the community dialogue about annexation between now and November, 2007. • Renton would experience financial benefits by having an election on the question in November in order to share the cost of the election with other jurisdictions and leverage property tax receipts most efficiently if annexation is approved BACKGROUND SUMMARY: At its regular City Council meeting of March 12, the Renton City Council adopted Resolution 3863 to accept the petition by residents in the Benson Hill Communities to annex to Renton. At that time, the Council also indicated that residents of the area would not be asked to vote on zoning or assumption of city indebtedness. The BRB held a public hearing about the Benson Hill Communities annexation on May 31, 2007, and is expected to support the annexation with slight technical boundary modifications and issue a record of decision on June 20, 2007. State law requires that the City of Renton act on the BRB's decision within 30 days of receipt of the BRB's decision. June 25 will be the City Council's next regular meeting following the BRB decision. The City must now indicate to the county auditor its preference for a special election date for submitting the proposal to the voters. The county legislative authority must then set the election date on the date indicated by the city. If the City Council approves placing the issue on the ballot, other deadlines for decisions by the Metropolitan King County Council and King County Records and Elections must be met. The City Council's meeting of July 9 is the latest a decision can be made to allow the Metropolitan King County Council and King County Records and Elections to act prior to August 13 for placement on the November ballot. In late April 2007, the City and County jointly funded a survey of voters in the area to determine their interest in annexation and services they value. From the survey, the City and County obtained information about what needed to be communicated about fire services, libraries, zoning, and tax levels and services, that could provide residents with information to make an informed decision. Other findings include: • If voters had to choose today, two-thirds would choose annexation to Renton. • Both those who favor staying unincorporated and those who favor annexation hold their opinions strongly (85% strongly believe the best thing is to stay unincorporated; and 86% strongly believe the best thing is to join Renton). • Most see annexation as having no, or a positive impact on quality of life. r.r+� Council President Toni Nelson Page 3 of 3 June 18,2007 • Those who think annexation will decrease services believe the property tax rate, fire and emergency medical services, and police services will be most affected. • Those who think annexation will increase quality of life identify police services, fire and emergency medical services, and parks to be most affected. • The three services voters rate as having the highest mean importance are police, fire/EMS and (improving) traffic congestion. • The three services voters rate with lowest mean satisfaction are preservation of open space, traffic congestion, and density and quality of development. • The services where voters would prefer improvement (greatest gap between importance and satisfaction) are property tax rate, road maintenance, traffic congestion, and density of development. In September 2006, the City and County jointly sponsored an informational community meeting. Another community-sponsored informational meeting is scheduled for July 19 to give community members an opportunity to discuss annexation. At that time, more information about city and county services and the possible implications of annexation will be discussed. Pre-zoning for the Benson Hill area is anticipated to be considered by the Planning Commission through comprehensive plan amendments; public hearings are scheduled for the Planning Commission to consider proposed pre-zoning in June and July of this year. A minimum of two public hearings on zoning will held in the future. The Administration also plans to provide neutral, factual information about the implications of annexation on Renton and respond to questions about public services it could provide in the area. CONCLUSION: The purpose of this resolution is to amend the boundaries and ballot title for the City's request to King County to place the question of annexation of Benson Hill Communities on the November 6, 2007 ballot. The resolution will allow Benson Hill voters an opportunity to indicate their preferences to annex, or not annex, to the City of Renton. *torr►, CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON RESOLUTION NO. 3 8 6 3 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON, CALLING FOR THE ANNEXATION, BY ELECTION, OF CONTIGUOUS UNINCORPORATED TERRITORY TO THE CITY OF RENTON AND REFERRED TO AS THE BENSON HILL COMMUNITIES ANNEXATION; STATING THE NUMBER OF REGISTERED VOTERS RESIDING THEREIN AS NEARLY AS MAY BE; CALLING FOR AN ELECTION ON NOVEMBER 6, 2007, TO SUBMIT TO VOTERS OF THE TERRITORY THE PROPOSAL FOR ANNEXATION; AND AUTHORIZING THE CITY CLERK TO FILE WITH THE KING COUNTY BOUNDARY REVIEW BOARD A NOTICE OF INTENTION AS WELL AS TO FILE A CERTIFIED COPY OF THIS RESOLUTION WITH THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONS OF KING COUNTY AND THE KING COUNTY BOUNDARY REVIEW BOARD, AND TO TAKE THOSE ACTIONS NECESSARY TO PLACE PROPOSITION 1 BEFORE THE VOTERS, INCLUDING THE PREPARATION OF INFORMATION FOR THE VOTER'S PAMPHLET. WHEREAS, a citizen's group currently pursuing potential annexation of the Benson Hill Communities Area to the City of Renton, has submitted a 10%Notice of Intention to Commence Annexation proceedings to the City; and WHEREAS,the Benson Hill Communities Area, consisting of approximately 2,438 acres, is located within the City of Renton's established Potential Annexation Area; and WHEREAS, the King County Records, Elections and Licensing Services Division certified the petition as having signatures representing at least ten percent of the registered voters who voted in the 2005 general election; and WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Renton, Washington, has determined that it would be in the best interests and general welfare of the City of Renton to annex the property within Renton's established Potential Annexation Area generally bounded by the City of Renton corporate boundary on the west and north, SE 192nd Street and S 200th Street on the south, and on the east, 108th Avenue SE, the eastern edge of Boulevard Lane Park, the western edge of 1 RESOLUTION NO. 3863 Boulevard Lane Division No. 2, and 128th Avenue SE, if extended, but including Renton Park and Charles Lindberg High School, as legally described in Exhibit "A" attached hereto and incorporated by reference as if fully set forth; and WHEREAS,the City Council is desirous to call for an election for this annexation; NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON, DOES RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS: SECTION I, The above findings are true and correct in all respects. SECTION H. As nearly as can be determined the number of voters residing in the aforesaid territory is 7,446. SECTION III. The City Council hereby calls for an election to be held on November 6, 2007, pursuant to Chapter 35A.14 RCW, to submit to the voters of the aforesaid territory the proposal for annexation. SECTION IV. The cost of said annexation election shall be paid by the City of Renton. SECTION V. The City Clerk shall file a certified copy of this Resolution with the Board of County Commissioners of King County, Washington and with the King County Boundary Review Board. SECTION VI. The City Clerk shall also file with the King County Boundary Review Board a Notice of Intention hereof as required by RCW 36.93.090 et seq. SECTION VII. The City Clerk is authorized and directed to take those actions necessary to place Proposition 1 before the voters in the November 6, 2007, election, for the Benson Hill Communities Annexation. 2 RESOLUTION NO. 3863 SECTION VIII. The City Attorney has prepared the following ballot title for Proposition 1. The City Clerk is authorized to transmit this ballot title to King County Division of Records and Elections: PROPOSITION 1 ANNEXATION TO THE CITY OF RENTON The Renton City Council received a petition to annex property to the City of Renton and passed a resolution calling for an election on the question. This measure would authorize annexation of that property, generally referred to as the Benson Hill Communities Annexation Area, to the City of Renton. Shall that area in unincorporated King County known as the Benson Hill Communities Annexation Area, as legally described in the above-mentioned resolution, be annexed to the City of Renton? ❑ For Annexation ❑ Against Annexation SECTION IX. The Mayor is authorized and directed to take those actions necessary to place the information regarding Proposition 1 in the November 6, 2007, election voter's pamphlet. PASSED BY THE CITY COUNCIL this 12th day of March , 2007. Bonnie L Walton, City Clerk APPROVED BY THE MAYOR this 12th day of March , 2007. 7eCaitA Kathy K i lker, Mayor Appr d as to form:W Lawrence J. Warren, City Attorney RES.1239:2/7/07:ma 3 RESOLUTION NO. 3863 BENSON HILL ANNEXATION LEGAL DESCRIPTION The lands included within the subject annexation are situated in parts of, Sections 21, 27, 28, 29, 31, 32 and 33 in Township 23 North, and Sections 5 and 6 in Township 22 North, all in Range 5 East, W.M., in King County, Washington, said annexation area being more particularly described as lying within the following described boundary: Beginning at the intersection of the northeasterly right of way margin of the City of Seattle Cedar River Pipe Line and the existing City of Renton Limits Line as annexed under Ordinance No.1961 in the southeast quarter of said Section 21; Thence southeasterly along said northeasterly right of way margin, crossing SE 160th Street, to the south line of said subdivision; Thence westerly, along said south line, crossing the Cedar River Pipe Line Right of Way and 128th Place SE, to the southwest corner of said subdivision said southwest corner also being the northeast corner of the west half of the Northeast quarter of said Section 28; Thence southerly along the east line of said subdivision, crossing the City of Seattle Pipe Line Right of Way and SE 1615t Street, to an intersection with the northerly right of way margin of SE 164th Street; Thence westerly along said northerly right of way margin, to the point of intersection with a perpendicular line passing through the westernmost point of curvature of the arc defining the northeastern boundary of Lot 8, Block 3 of the Plat of Cascade Vista No. 5, as recorded under Volume 68 of Plats, Page 65, records of King County, Washington; Thence southerly along said perpendicular line, to the southerly right of way margin of SE 164th Street and the north line of said Lot 8; Thence southeasterly and southerly along the eastern boundary of said Lot 8, to the southeast corner thereof, said southeast corner also being on the north line of the South half of the Northeast quarter of said Section 28; Thence easterly along said north line, crossing 128th Avenue SE, to an intersection with the east line of said Section 28; Thence southerly along said east line, to the northwest corner of"Tract A", Fairwood Park Division 7, as recorded under Volume 116 of Plats, Pages 88 through 90, records of King County, Washington in said Section 27; Nose 9/27/2006 RESOLUTION NO. 3863 Thence generally easterly, southerly, westerly and southerly along the various courses of said "Tract A", to a point on the northerly right of way margin of SE Petrovitsky Road (John Petrovitsky Road Ext. No. 1401), in the Southwest quarter of the Southwest quarter of said Section 27; Thence southwesterly, westerly and northwesterly along the various courses of said northerly right of way margin, crossing 129th Avenue SE, and the northwesterly extension of said northerly right of way margin, to an intersection with the southerly extension of the easterly right of way margin of 128th Avenue SE, in the Southeast quarter of the Southeast quarter of said Section 28; Thence southerly along said southerly extension, crossing SE Petrovitsky Road, to an intersection with the southeasterly extension of the southerly right of way margin thereof; Thence northwesterly along said southeasterly extension, crossing 128thAvenue SE, to the Northwest corner of that portion of 128thAvenue SE dedicated per deed under King County Rec. No. 20000913001594 and on the westerly right of way margin of 128thAvenue SE; Thence southeasterly and southerly along said westerly right of way margin, to an intersection with the east line of the west half of the Southeast quarter of said Section 28; Thence southerly along said east line, to the southeast corner of said subdivision said southeast corner also being the northeast corner of the Northwest quarter of the Northeast quarter of said Section 33; Thence southerly along the east line of said subdivision, to the southeast corner thereof, said southeast corner also being the northwest corner of the Southeast quarter of the Northeast quarter of said Section 33; Thence easterly along the north line of said subdivision, to an intersection with the northeasterly right of way margin of the Puget Sound Power & Light Transmission right of way; Thence southeasterly along said northeasterly right of way margin, to an intersection with the northeasterly extension of the southeasterly lines of Lots 2 and 3, King County Short Plat No. 779163R, recorded under King County Rec. No. 8105060679; Thence southwesterly along said extension and the southeasterly lines of said lots, to an intersection with the northeasterly line of Lot 1, King County Short Plat No. C1077001, recorded under King County Rec. No. 7806080590; Thence northwesterly and southwesterly along the northeasterly and northwesterly lines of said Lot 1, to the most westerly corner thereof, said corner also being a point on the south line of Lot 2 of said short plat; ,41.104 9/27/2006 2 RESOLUTION NO. 3863 Thence westerly along said south line, to the northeast corner of Lot 4, King County Short Plat No. 775088, recorded under King County Rec. No. 7710200755; Thence southwesterly along the east line of said Lot 4 to the southeast corner thereof, said corner also being on the northwesterly line of Boulevard Lane Division No. 2, as recorded under Volume 82 of Plats, Pages 20 and 21, records of King County, Washington; Thence continuing southwesterly along said northwesterly line, and southerly along the westerly line of Boulevard Lane Division 1, as recorded under Volume 80 of Plats, Pages 89 and 90, records of King County, Washington, to the westernmost southwest corner of said plat, said southwest corner also being on a line 1073.56 feet north of and parallel with the south line of the Southeast quarter of said Section 33; Thence westerly along said parallel line, to a point 300.00 feet easterly of the west line of said subdivision, as measured perpendicular therefrom; Thence southeasterly to the point of intersection of a line 422 feet east of and parallel with the west line of said subdivision and a line 300 feet north of and parallel with the south line of said subdivision; Thence southerly, parallel with the west line of said subdivision, to a point on the northerly right of way margin of SE 192" Street, said northerly right of way margin being 50 feet northerly of the south line of said Section 33 and the centerline of SE 192n *lar Street; Thence westerly along the various courses of said northerly right of way margin, crossing 120thAvenue SE, 1 16thAvenue SE, 114th Place SE and 113th Way SE to its intersection with the easterly right of way margin of State Route 515, said intersection being 40 feet right of Station 270+50 per Washington State Department of Highways, Right of Way Plan SR 515 MP 3.87 to MP 5.15, Renton Vicinity: SE 196th to Carr Road, Sta 2.57+00 to Sta 283+00, Sheet 2 of 4 Sheets in said Section 32; Thence westerly, crossing State Route 515 (108th Avenue SE), to a point 40 feet left of Station 270+40 per said Right of Way Plan; Thence southerly along the various courses of said westerly margin, crossing SE 192" Street, SE 196th Street and SE 199th Street, to the northerly margin of SE 200th Street in said Section 5; Thence westerly along the various courses of said northerly right of way margin, crossing 106thAvenue SE, 105th Avenue SE and 104th Avenue SE, to its intersection with the existing City of Renton Limits Line as annexed under City of Renton Ordinance No. 3885; Tikaw 9/27/2006 3 RESOLUTION NO. 3863 Thence generally northerly and easterly along the various courses of the existing limits of the City of Renton as annexed under City of Renton Ordinance Nos. (in order from south to north) 3885, 3109, 3751, 3268, 5205, 5041, 3268, 4069, 1743, 4476, 1971, 3864, 1971, '" 3742, 1971, 3108, 1909, 3730, 2224, 1871 and 1961 to the Point of Beginning; EXCEPT the north 100 feet of the west 230 feet of the South half of the South half of the Northwest quarter of the Southeast quarter of said Section 29, previously annexed to the City of Renton under Ordinance No. 3432. TOGETHER WITH the following: That portion of Lot 3, King County Short Plat 779163R recorded under King County Rec. No. 8105060679, within the South half of the Northeast quarter of the Northeast quarter of said Section 33, if any; and Those portions of the Northeast quarter of said Section 6 and the Northwest quarter of said Section 5, except the south 30 feet thereof, lying southerly, westerly, southerly and westerly of existing City of Renton Limits Line as annexed under City of Renton Ordinance Nos. (in order from north to south): 3268, 3751, and 3109, except the south 30 feet thereof; and That portion of the Northwest quarter of said Section 5, lying northerly of the northerly right of way margin of S. 200th Street, westerly and southerly of existing City of Renton Limits Line as annexed under City of Renton Ordinance No.3885, and easterly of existing City of Renton Limits Line as annexed under City of Renton Ordinance No. 3109; and The east 20' of the Northeast quarter of the Southeast quarter of said Section 21, lying southerly of the thread of the Cedar River. 9/27/2006 4 RESOLUTION NO. 3863 St /� / I 111 IC Rmtm Vilage PI ,, - - - --- - ) ')'..s e - / s ! _rte , 1 - i_ I ..".g o-- - ----- ---- j ", so r A ;` Nis Dr '' // -: .4.0.*,;140/7/7 ii ;113 5... ANA �, `' __- v Li 1 14 Y. 4♦J' _ �1 insole. fy.. -G, / fit,t <,, -:u ' h .int t.. 81,1hire • '� 5, . =:mo : I=MAM , \ .'- . � =E203 , .■.•W.'.Irats7=i r r r11=' % % \.. .:s tern i..lr.•„■n i, II �. 4, --1 G ' St 1ff/ RE w\rij Y3 I �-1 —_- �4■14 I I . ✓,, .,,,,, '',,,;,,,-;,-;.%,- !'i.' �, ,�›.I 11111^�1■11■1.//■1 a iG't'Ll r,:vaiwr: a r i Na•..:� -. l 11.� 4�I� N \ �_�I !♦�•i •40104041:. i , _ 'I�lr,.. ♦♦Jij SW 21st St NI,sq.,%41:71.1u E, = � ♦A ) • :aaq■ tit "� �) s Ot•'s"rfl �■ •�•.1 ■■ .. j• '�11 ' •i Ir .♦ ■■�■::-i.NurI>3tMrzn t .�• •��♦i iit 'a■,:■rr • D•• • i nn raw 4.!i'-.. I■•i• --� 4u �ry�♦isi..;`...'614 '�■s♦♦• .■r 31t^'tui:.... O•!atrte:O t i SW 23rd l nn■ e•: rr q ►� \ �1 nnI �ulog •.• • II �.. ■ n. 1•A\• 1 ecu=-,�II 1 r o.. .�i♦' \ I \ ij��i:C C' j y n 11111111/ • 11Ar E3Fi111 a pip:a tnl i�l mum'Igri 1 Is, . I N bilI 11Ra:: -I%�• •ta:u:eve a' • 3 r.._�?, ■ry,��a •♦114 s 27th st 1 t ■1 sl,�. [ ■' - ■::7�■ii::�:�arry,. I ♦ ��Ic a•7■Ti midi`rI■ sa IIIA 1111:1: ■ 1 � ..-II� • I ■4's 1,111om, ...•Alaii ':a►w' W m� C ,�1.ol1_............y..e rtpaen■ -:a/.utL101.♦- �_ r 1`'•, .]tS�l'_ ♦`.�'? /►. 'tet�H� 7.1�a �� ■� 1� .C:IVS]J7CVOI/7--y■A. .► `� Iet•/II/ j i ra■♦Si♦Oi...i i p i t♦(h�t��_, or...,�. : II .■ ♦ �...■;•� ' n' s•2'; s I . \, - •i"�i,. • •■■1 ' .° t;4. 3 silk ytf(1,17r tq •O�On . " w p • ■• .Aul3;u rife nE,l�".■.`• a _ •.Y.♦. +111 Q► v ,1■11 nn u, IN =vs INIIN Min ir,- ��-j- 1,Will-- -.4 IP t• As LI i if"- -- 1 .1,01%,FII,.■•■. • VVir11 e.!-! _ on . .m_ont ........ Is ark*11Pa. =W4.fee In11 cep.m II r 111 nal !II ►► IInetau■:rn nnnw.n Is ii Iowa. ♦.., ✓iok =ME ■ I) 1�■ • ■■ . -. M. fx _\ .. a�. .•tinyln 3 ..a In Bin. III E � ■a. ♦4,* ..1 i� •LR: ii• P sm tum�� -mum:M.,-ill� �� ■■ i '� MI 1 In L�t1r111� -Ee: I. 111inn1;1 •■_ _�-a ?y44 am 4.....•3--- SW••th I.t • . • -� ■ ■g/nom j• .".../:li.-..% _ •-;`• .€" g• 1 Wo C 4.4.1.4• OP .A��■�' i'iit3iil: 172nd St :■ RII:i '(n!i pnu•�% II Sn� ml.ir 11111! - i/ .•■ !.:� ■ ♦ .lei i -- ♦ 3■'/Y a.'4Y:1t 4.11". /' C= 1. r, !•` - _- 1--11111■Hint .... •r■� •rY� d'i•Ap ',� 111...i 1 ,111 W4 G'e1j nn a -u VIT.' gra.*o.. T, % y�111� Erg �hi::nnnl0nnv�. t mann I n' E 1 NB E- --,,,‘ rl. y� ■' •.1 CITY OF RENTON COUNCIL AGENDA BILL Al#:11160, Submitting Data: Planning/Building/Public Works For Agenda of: June 25, 2007 Dept/Div/Board.. Development Services Staff Contact Larry Meckling (ext. 7280) Agenda Status Consent X Subject: Public Hearing.. Adoption of Standard Codes by reference to City Code. Correspondence.. Ordinance Resolution Old Business Exhibits: New Business Issue Paper Study Sessions Ordinance Information Recommended Action: Approvals: Council Concur Legal Dept X Finance Dept Other Fiscal Impact: None Expenditure Required... Transfer/Amendment Amount Budgeted Revenue Generated Total Project Budget City Share Total Project SUMMARY OF ACTION: The adoption of the 2006 International Code Series with Washington State Amendments. The adoption of the 2006 Washington State Energy Code and Washington State Ventilation and Indoor Air Quality Code. The adoption of the 2006 International Plumbing Code with Washington State Amendments. The adoption of the 2005 National Electric Code with City of Renton Amendments. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends Council approve adoption of codes and the ordinance. H.\Division.s\Develop.ser\Constser\AMBER\Agenda Bills\Code Adoption-Agenda Bill.doc `SY O PLANNINGBUILDING/ ti • ,,. ® , PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT ,Nrc0 MEMORANDUM DATE: June 18, 2007 TO: Toni Nelson, Council President Members of the Renton City Council VIA: Keolker, Mayor :Ng // FROM: Gregg Zimmerruarl;J ministrator STAFF CONTACT: Larry Meckling, Building Official (ext. 7280) SUBJECT: Adoption of Revised Washington Administrative Codes ISSUE: Should Council authorize adoption of the revised Washington Administrative Codes? RECOMMENDATION: Now Staff recommends adoption of the latest publication of the Washington Administrative Codes by City Council. BACKGROUND SUMMARY: All adopted codes used by the City of Renton are updated to include the latest technology and are published in a three-year code cycle. The state Legislature reviews and adopts these codes every code cycle. The City of Renton and other jurisdictions then adopt codes after state adoption is completed. CONCLUSION: The Planning/Building/Public Works Department requests authorization to adopt the revised Washington Administrative Codes. cc: Neil Watts,Development Services Director Larry Meckling, Building Official File *4410.0 h:\division.s\develop.ser\const.ser\amber\agenda bills\code adoption-issue paper.doc CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON ORDINANCE NO. AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON, AMENDING SECTIONS 4-5-040, 4-5-050, 4-5-055, 4-5-090, 4-5-100, AND 4- 5-110 AND ADDING SECTION 4-5-051 OF CHAPTER 5, BUILDING AND FIRE PREVENTION STANDARDS, OF TITLE IV (DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS) OF ORDINANCE NO. 4260 ENTITLED "CODE OF GENERAL ORDINANCES OF THE CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON" BY AMENDING ADOPTING THE 2006 INTERNATIONAL BUILDING, RESIDENTIAL, MECHANICAL, TILE WASHINGTON STATE ENERGY CODE, AND FUEL GAS CODES, THE 2005 NATIONAL ELECTRIC CODE, THE 2006 WASHINGTON STATE VENTILATION AND INDOOR AIR QUALITY CODE, AND THE 2006 UNIFORM PLUMBING CODE, AND AMENDMENTS THERETO. THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON, DOES ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS: SECTION I. The title to Section 4-5-010 of Chapter 5, Building and Fire Prevention Standards, of Title IV(Development Regulations) of Ordinance No. 4260 entitled "Code of General Ordinances of the City of Renton, Washington" is hereby amended to read as follows: 4-5-010 ADOPTION OF STAI'h,NATIONAL, UNIFORM, AND INTERNATIONAL CODES SECTION H. SECTION 4-5-040, National Electrical Code, of Chapter 5, Building and Fire Prevention Standards, of Title IV(Development Regulations) of Ordinance No. 4260 entitled"Code of General Ordinances of the City of Renton, Washington" is hereby amended to read as follows: evid 1 ORDINANCE NO. 4-5-040 NATIONAL ELECTRICAL CODE A. ADOPTION: The"National Electrical Code," 2005 Edition, as published by the National Fire Protection Association, as amended by the City of Renton is hereby adopted as the National Electrical Code, or NEC 2005 Edition, for the City of Renton, and may hereinafter be designated as "City of Renton Electrical Code, 2005." SECTION III. Section 4-5-050, International Building Code, of Chapter 5, Building and Fire Prevention Standards, of Title IV(Development Regulations) of Ordinance No. 4260 entitled "Code of General Ordinances of the City of Renton, Washington" is hereby amended to read as follows: 4-5-050 INTERNATIONAL BUILDING CODE A. ADOPTION: The"International Building Code," 2006 Edition, as published by the "International Code Council, Inc." as amended by chapter 51-40 WAC is hereby adopted by reference. B. APPLICABILITY: It shall be unlawful for any person, firm or corporation to erect, construct, enlarge, alter, repair, move, improve, remove, convert or demolish, equip, use, occupy or maintain any building or structure in the city, or cause or permit the same to be done, contrary to or in violation of any of the provisions of this Code. C. STATE AMENDMENTS TO THE INTERNATIONAL BUILDING CODE: The International Building Code, as amended by chapter 51-40 WAC, is hereby adopted by reference and as an amendment to the International Building Code and shall supersede conflicting sections of the International Building Code. Now 2 ORDINANCE NO. SECTION IV. Section 4-5-050 F, Washington State Energy Code and Washington State Ventilation and Indoor Air Quality Code, of Chapter 5, Building and Fire Prevention Standards, of Title VI (Development Regulations of Ordinance No. 4260 entitled "Code of General Ordinances of the City of Renton, Washington" is hereby repealed. SECTION V. There is hereby created a new Code Section 4-5-051 to read as follows 4-5-051 WASHINGTON STATE ENERGY CODE AND WASHINGTON STATE VENTILATION AND INDOOR AIR QUALITY CODE ADOPTED: The 2006 Washington State Energy Code as adopted by the State of Washington Second Edition (chapter 51-11 WAC) and 2006 Washington State Ventilation and Indoor Air Quality Code, Second Edition (chapter 51-13 WAC) are hereby adopted by reference. SECTION VI. Section, 4-5-055, International Residential Code, of Chapter 5, Building and Fire Prevention Standards, of Title IV (Development Regulations) of Ordinance No. 4260 entitled "Code of General Ordinances of the City of Renton, Washington" is hereby amended, to read as follows: 4-5-055 INTERNATIONAL RESIDENTIAL CODE: A. ADOPTION: The"International Residential Code," 2006 Edition, as published by the"International Code Council, Inc." as amended by chapter 51-40 WAC is hereby adopted by reference. SECTION VII. Sections 4-5-090, 4-5-100, and 4-5-110 of Chapter 5, Building and Fire Prevention Standards, of Title IV (Development Regulations) of Ordinance No. 4260 entitled "Code of General Ordinances of the City of Renton, Washington" are hereby amended, to read as follows: Ned 3 ORDINANCE NO. 4-5-090 INTERNATIONAL MECHANICAL CODE: A. ADOPTION: The"Uniform Mechanical Code, 2006 Edition," as published by the"International Code Council" as amended by chapter 51-42 WAC is hereby adopted by reference. 4-5-100 INTERNATIONAL FUEL GAS CODE A. ADOPTION: The International Fuel Gas Code 2006 Edition," as published by the "International Code Council" as amended by chapter 51-42 WAC is hereby adopted by reference. 4-5-110 UNIFORM PLUMBING CODE A. ADOPTION: The Uniform Plumbing Code, 2006 Edition, as published by the"International Association of Plumbing and Mechanical Officials" and chapters 51-56 and 51-57 WAC are Nimpo hereby adopted by reference. B. STATE AMENDMENTS TO UNIFORM PLUMBING CODE: Whenever there is a discrepancy in the requirements between the Uniform Plumbing Code, as published by the "International Association of Plumbing and Mechanical Officials" and chapters 51-56 and 51-57 WAC, the Washington Administrative Code sections will be deemed to have amended the Uniform Plumbing Code, as published by the "International Association of Plumbing and Mechanical Officials." 4 ORDINANCE NO. C. CITY AMENDMENTS TO UNIFORM PLUMBING CODE Section 102.3: The first paragraph of section 102.3 of the UPC, relating to violations and penalties, is amended by substituting in its stead RMC 1-3-2, Civil Penalties. SECTION VIII. This ordinance shall be effective upon its passage, approval, and 30 days after publication. PASSED BY THE CITY COUNCIL this day of June, 2007. Bonnie I. Walton, City Clerk APPROVED BY THE MAYOR this day of June, 2007. Kathy Keolker, Mayor Approved as to form: Lawrence J. Warren, City Attorney Date of Publication: ORD.1364:5/31/07:ch Ned 5 ,. CITY OF RENTON COUNCIL AGENDA BILL AI#: /,'`) : ' 0 i411Submitting Data: For Agenda of: June 25, 2007 """'� Dept/Div/Board.. Economic Development, Neighborhoods and Strategic Planning Staff Contact Rebecca Lind(ext. 6588) Agenda Status Consent Subject: Public Hearing.. Correspondence.. Ratification of the 2006 Amendments to the Ordinance Countywide Planning Policies Resolution X _ Old Business Exhibits: New Business Issue Paper Study Sessions Resolution Information King County Correspondence King County Signature Reports with attached GMPC Motion Reports and King County Staff Reports • • Recommended Action: Approvals: Council Concur. Legal Dept X Finance Dept Other Fiscal Impact: NA Expenditure Required... Transfer/Amendment Amount Budgeted Revenue Generated Total Project Budget City Share Total Project.. SUMMARY OF ACTION: The Growth Management Planning Council (GMPC) and Metropolitan King County Council completed review of amendments to the Countywide Planning Policies (CPP) in April 2007. These amendments are now presented to the Renton City Council for ratification. Three issues are addressed in the 2006 CPP Amendments. • Motion 06-01 designates West Hill as part of Renton's Potential Annexation Area. • Motion 06-02 amends existing Countywide Planning Policy LU-25b to allow adjustment of household and employment targets of a new municipal incorporation occurs within a designated Potential Annexation Area. • Motion 06-03 designates the Overlake area of Redmond as an Urban Center. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: kiwiAdopt a Resolution supporting GMPC Motions 06-01, 06-02, 06-03 to amend the Countywide Planning Policies. H:\EDNSP\Regional Issues\GMPC\CPPB\06CPPAmendmentAgendabilldoc.doc ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT, 'taw' Uti � NEIGHBORHOODS, AND STRATEGIC ' ,i ® ' PLANNING DEPARTMENT MEMORANDUM DATE: June 15, 2007 TO: Toni Nelson, Council President Members of the Renton City Council VIA: )% Kathy Keolker, Mayor FROM: '( Alex Pietsch, Administrator PliVe STAFF CONTACT: Rebecca Lind, Long Range Planning Manager (ext. 6588) SUBJECT: Ratification of 2006 Amendment to the Countywide Planning Policies ISSUE: Should the City Council ratify the 2006 amendments to the Countywide Planning Policies (CPPs) as proposed by the Growth Management Planning Council (GMPC)? RECOMMENDATION: Adopt a resolution ratifying the amendments. BACKGROUND SUMMARY: The action before the City Council is the annual ratification of amendments to the CPPs that occurred in the last calendar year. The GMPC approved these amendments in September 2006, and the Metropolitan King County Council adopted and ratified them on behalf of unincorporated King County on April 9, 2007. To become effective, amendments must be ratified by at least 30 percent of the city and county governments representing 70 percent of the population of King County. Jurisdictions opposing the amendments are required to deny the ratification by July 8, 2007. If the City of Renton opposes the amendments, it is likely that they would still receive the necessary support from other jurisdictions to achieve ratification. Failure to act is deemed the equivalent of ratification. The CPPs are intended to provide a policy framework for all jurisdictions' comprehensive plans in order to provide the regional planning and coordination among local governments required by the Growth Management Act (GMA). The CPPs set forth guidance for the location of growth and infrastructure investment in the region and establish specific employment and housing targets for each jurisdiction. Jurisdictions must adopt land use and zoning to accommodate these Norse H:\EDNSP\Regional Issues\GMPC\CPPs\2006 Ratification Issue Paper.doc Toni Nelson Page 2 of 2 June 15,2007 targets in their respective plans and development regulations. Several 2006 amendments specifically affect Renton. • Motion 06-01 adds the West Hill to Renton's PAA and was initiated at the City's request after the City Council amended the boundary on December 12, 2005. • Motion 06-02 was also proposed by the City or Renton, and offers a clarification of existing Countywide Planning Policy(CPP) LU-25b to allow adjustment of household and employment targets if a new municipal incorporation occurs within a designated Potential Annexation Area. This amendment is particularly important for the City because it provides a mechanism to insure that a future incorporated City of Fairwood would be responsible for accommodating its share of the regional growth target. At the present time CPP Policy LU-25b provides that growth targets shall be adjusted for annexations only. The new language adds incorporations to the policy statement. The proposed language of LU25b reads as follows: As annexations or incorporations occur, growth targets shall be adjusted. Household and employment targets for each jurisdiction's potential annexation area, as adopted in Table JU- 1, shall be transferred to the annexing jurisdiction or newly incorporated city as follows: a. King County and the respective city will determine new household and employment targets for areas under consideration for annexation prior to the submittal of the annexation proposal to the King County Boundary Review Board; b. b. A city's household and employment targets shall be increased by a share of the potential annexation area's development capacity located within the area annexed. In the case of incorporation, an equivalent formula shall be used to establish household and employment targets for the new city. Each city will determine how and where within their corporate boundaries to accommodate the target increases; c. The County's target shall be correspondingly decreased to ensure that overall target levels in the county remain the same; d. The household and employment targets in Table LU-1 will be updated periodically to reflect changes due to annexations or incorporations. These target updates do not require adoption by the Growth Management Planning Council. CONCLUSION The proposed 2006 amendments to the CPP are consistent with the GMA and support Renton's policy positions on the West Hill and on equitable assumption of growth targets in the Soos Creek portion of the PAA. Ratification of the amendment package is recommended. While it is not necessary to take formal action, passage of a resolution puts Renton on the record as supporting the amendments and provides a way to track Renton's position in the future. h:\ednsp\regional issues\gmpc\cpps\2006 ratification issue paper.doc CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON low RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON RATIFYING AMENDMENTS TO THE COUNTYWIDE PLANNING POLICIES. WHEREAS, the Growth Management Act, RCW 36.70A.210 mandates the development and adoption of Countrywide Planning Policies for King County; and WHEREAS, King County, the City of Seattle, the City of Bellevue and the Suburban Cities of King County have met jointly as the Growth Management Planning Council (GMP) to develop and recommend Countywide Planning Policies; and WHEREAS, the City of Renton has ratified the Countywide Planning Policies and subsequent amendments, and WHEREAS, Countywide Planning Policy FW-1 Step 9 provides for an amendment process to changer the Planning Policies as may be necessary from time to time, and WHEREAS, On April 9, 2007, the Metropolitan King County Council took action ratifying the proposed amendments to the King County Countywide Planning Policies including: 1) GMPC Motion 06-01 Amendment to the Potential Annexation Area Map by including the area known as West Hill within the Potential Annexation Area of the City of Renton PAA and adding this area to the City of Renton's PAA. 2) GMPC Motion 06-02 Amendment to the Countywide Planning policies revising existing policy LU-25b to allow adjustment of househhold and employment targets if a new municipal incorporation occurs within a designated Potential Annexation Area (PAA). 141.0, 1 RESOLUTION NO. 3) GMPC Motion 06-03 Amendment to the Countywide Planning Policies by designating the Overlake area of Redmond as an Urban Center. WHEREAS, the amendment process requires ratification of the proposed amendments by at least 30 percent of the City and County governments representing 70 percent of the population in King County, NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON, DOES RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS: SECTION I. The above findings are true and correct in all respects. SECTION II. The best interests and general welfare of the City of the City of Renton would be served by ratification of Ordinance 15709 (GMPC Motions 06-012, 06-02, and 06-03) as approved by the King County Council and the Growth Management Planning Council. PASSED BY THE CITY COUNCIL this day of , 2007. Bonnie I. Walton, City Clerk APPROVED BY THE MAYOR this day of , 2007. Kathy Keolker-Wheeler, Mayor Approved as to form: Lawrence J. Warren, City Attorney RES. 1279:06/20/07:ch King County .41 April 27, 2007 The Honorable Kathy Keolker City of Renton 1055 South Grady Way Renton, WA 98055 f4f Dear Mayor .i lker. We are pleased to forward for your consideration and ratification the enclosed amendments to the King County Countywide Planning Policies (CPP). On April 9, 2007, the Metropolitan King County Council approved and ratified ``'o'" amendments on behalf of unincorporated King County. Copies of the King County Council staff report, ordinance and Growth Management Planning Council motions are enclosed to assist you in your review of these amendments. • Ordinance No. 15709, GMPC Motion Nos. 06-1, 06-2 and 06-3 amending the Countywide Planning Policies by amending the interim Potential Annexation Area map in the Countywide Planning Policies; revising existing policy LU-25b to allow adjustment of household and employment targets if a new municipal incorporation occurs within a designated Potential Annexation Area; and designating the Overlake area of Redmond as an Urban Center, Overlake is added to the list of Urban Centers following Countywide Planning Policy LU-39. In accordance with the Countywide Planning Policies, FW-1, Step 9, amendments become effective when ratified by ordinance or resolution by at least 30 percent of the city and county governments representing 70 percent of the population of King County according to the interlocal agreement. A city will be deemed to have ratified the amendments to the Countywide Planning Policies unless, within 90 days of adoption by King County, the city takes legislative action to disapprove the amendments. Please note that the 90-day deadline for this amendment is July 8, 2007. �G� .4410 If you adopt any legislation relative to this action, please send a copy of the legislation by the close of business, July 9, 2007, to Anne Noris, Clerk of the Council, W1039 King County Courthouse, 516 Third Avenue, Seattle, WA 98104. If you have any questions about the amendments or ratification process, please contact Paul Reitenbach, Senior Policy Analyst, King County Department of Development and Environmental Services, at 206-296-6705, or Rick Bautista, Council Staff, King County Council, at 206-296-0329. Thank you for your prompt attention to this matter. Sincerely, d Larry Gossett, Chair *4410, Metropolitan King County Council King County Executive Enclosures cc: King County City Planning Directors Suburban Cities Association Stephanie Warden, Director, Department of Development and Environmental Services (DDES) Paul Reitenbach, Senior Policy Analyst, DDES Rick Bautista, Council Staff, Growth Management & Natural Resources Committee (GM&NR) • '' KING COUNTY 1200 King County Courthouse 516 Third Avenue Seattle,WA 98104 Signature Report King County April 10, 2007 Ordinance 15709 Proposed No. 2006-0578.1 • Sponsors Phillips 1 AN ORDINANCE adopting amendments to the 2 Countywide Planning Policies; amending the interim 3 potential annexation areas map and ratifying the amended 4 Countywide Planning Policies for unincorporated King 5 County; and amending Ordinance 10450, Section 3, as 6 amended, and K.C.C. 20.10.030 and Ordinance 10450, *owe 7 Section 4, as amended, and K.C.C. 20.10.040. 8 9 10 BE IT ORDAINED BY THE COUNCIL OF KING COUNTY: 11 SECTION 1. Findings. The council makes the following findings: 12 A. The metropolitan King County council adopted and ratified the Growth 13 Management Planning Council recommended King County 2012 - Countywide Planning 14 Policies (Phase I) in July 1992, under Ordinance 10450. 15 B. The metropolitan King County council adopted and ratified the Phase II 16 amendments to the Countywide Planning Policies on August 15, 1994, under Ordinance 17 11446. Amy 1 Ordinance 15709 18 C. The Growth Management Planning Council met on April 26, 2006 and 19 September 20, 2006 and voted to recommend amendments to the King County 20 Countywide Planning Policies, amending the interim potential annexation areas map as 21 shown in Attachment A to this ordinance and designating Overlake an Urban Center as 22 shown on Attachment B to this ordinance. The Growth Management Planning Council 23 also approved an amendment to Countywide Planning Policy LU-25b to allow 24 adjustments of growth targets as municipal incorporations are approved. 25 SECTION 2. Ordinance 10450, Section 3, as amended, and K.C.C. 20.10.030 are 26 each hereby amended to read as follows: 27 Phase II. 28 A. The Phase II Amendments to the King County 2012 Countywide Planning 29 Policies attached to Ordinance 11446 are hereby approved and adopted. 30 B. The Phase II Amendments to the King County 2012 - Countywide Planning 31 Policies are amended, as shown by Attachment 1 to Ordinance 12027. 32 C. The Phase II Amendments to the King County 2012 - Countywide Planning 33 Policies are amended, as shown by Attachment I to Ordinance 12421. 34 D. The Phase II Amendments to the King County 2012 - Countywide Planning 35 Policies are amended, as shown by Attachments 1 and 2 to Ordinance 13260. 36 E. The Phase II Amendments to the King County 2012 - Countywide Planning 37 Policies are amended, as shown by Attachments 1 through 4 to Ordinance 13415. 38 F. The Phase II Amendments to the King County 2012 - Countywide Planning 39 Policies are amended, as shown by Attachments 1 through 3 to Ordinance 13858. Nod 2 • Ordinance 15709 40 G. The Phase II Amendments to the King County 2012—Countywide Planning 440400,41 Policies are amended, as shown by Attachment 1 to Ordinance 14390. 42 H. The Phase II Amendments to the King County 2012 —Countywide Planning 43 Policies are amended, as shown by Attachment 1 to Ordinance 14391. 44 I. The Phase II Amendments to the King County 2012 —Countywide Planning 45 Policies are amended, as shown by Attachment 1 to Ordinance 14392. 46 J. The Phase II Amendments to the King County 2012 - Countywide Planning 47 Policies are amended, as shown by Attachment 1 to Ordinance 14652. 48 K. The Phase II Amendments to the King County 2012 - Countywide Planning 49 Policies are amended, as shown by Attachments 1 through 3 to Ordinance 14653. 50 L. The Phase II Amendments to the King County 2012 - Countywide Planning 51 Policies are amended, as shown by Attachment 1 to Ordinance 14654. '46052 M. The Phase II Amendments to the King County 2012 - Countywide Planning 53 Policies are amended, as shown by Attachment 1 to Ordinance 14655. 54 N. The Phase II Amendments to the King County 2012 - Countywide Planning 55 Policies are amended, as shown by Attachments 1 and 2 to Ordinance 14656. 56 O. The Phase II amendments to the King County 2012 —Countywide Planning 57 Policies are amended, as shown by Attachment A to Ordinance 14844. 58 P. The Phase II Amendments to the King County 2012 - Countywide Planning 59 Policies are amended as shown by Attachments A, B and C to Ordinance 15121. 60 Q. The Phase II Amendments to the King County 2012 - Countywide Planning 61 Policies are amended, as shown by Attachment A to Ordinance 15122. 3 Ordinance 15709 62 R. The Phase II Amendments to the King County 2012 - Countywide Planning Nond 63 Policies are amended, as shown by Attachment A to Ordinance 15123. 64 S. Phase II Amendments to the King County 2012 - Countywide Planning 65 Policies are amended,as shown by Attachments A and B to Ordinance 15426. 66 T. Phase II Amendments to the King County 2012 - Countywide Planning 67 Policies are amended, as shown by Attachments A, B and C to this ordinance. 68 SECTION 3. Ordinance 10450, Section 4, as amended, and K.C.C. 20.10.040 are 69 each hereby amended to read as follows: 70 Ratification for unincorporated King County. 71 A. Countywide Planning Policies adopted by Ordinance 10450 for the purposes 72 specified are hereby ratified on behalf of the population of unincorporated King County. 73 B. The amendments to the Countywide Planning Policies adopted by Ordinance 74 10840 are hereby ratified on behalf of the population of unincorporated King County. `""d 75 C. The amendments to the Countywide Planning Policies adopted by Ordinance 76 11061 are-hereby ratified on behalf of the population of unincorporated King County. 77 D. The Phase II amendments to the King County 2012 Countywide Planning 78 Policies adopted by Ordinance 11446 are hereby ratified on behalf of the population of 79 unincorporated King County. 80 E. The amendments to the King County 2012 - Countywide Planning Policies, as 81 shown by Attachment 1 to Ordinance 12027 are hereby ratified on behalf of the 82 population of unincorporated King County. 4 Ordinance 15709 83 F. The amendments to the King County 2012 - Countywide Planning Policies, as 14610''84 shown by Attachment 1 to Ordinance 12421, are hereby ratified on behalf of the 85 population of unincorporated King County. 86 G. The amendments to the King County 2012 - Countywide Planning Policies, as 87 shown by Attachments 1 and 2 to Ordinance 13260, are hereby ratified on behalf of the 88 population of unincorporated King County. 89 H. The amendments to the King County 2012 - Countywide Planning Policies, as 90 shown by Attachment 1 through 4 to Ordinance 13415, are hereby ratified on behalf of 91 the population of unincorporated King County. 92 I. The amendments to the King County 2012 - Countywide Planning Policies, as 93 shown by Attachments 1 through 3 to Ordinance 13858, are hereby ratified on behalf of 94 the population of unincorporated King County. * .►95 J. The amendments to the King County 2012 - Countywide Planning Policies, as 96 shown by Attachment 1 to Ordinance 14390, are hereby ratified on behalf of the 97 population of unincorporated King County. 98 K. The amendments to the King County 2012 - Countywide Planning Policies, as 99 shown by Attachment 1 to Ordinance 14391, are hereby ratified on behalf of the 100 population of unincorporated King County. 101 L. The amendments to the King County 2012 - Countywide Planning Policies, as 102 shown by Attachment 1 to Ordinance 14392, are hereby ratified on behalf of the 103 population of unincorporated King County. 5 Ordinance 15709 104 M. The amendments to the King County 2012 - Countywide Planning Policies, as Nvid 105 shown by Attachment 1 to Ordinance 14652, are hereby ratified on behalf of the 106 population of unincorporated King County. 107 N. The amendments to the King County 2012 - Countywide Planning Policies, as 108 shown by Attachments 1 through 3 to Ordinance 14653, are hereby ratified on behalf of 109 the population of unincorporated King County. 110 O. The amendments to the King County 2012 - Countywide Planning Policies, as 111 shown by Attachment 1 to Ordinance 14654, are hereby ratified on behalf of the 112 population of unincorporated King County. 113 P. The amendments to the King County 2012 - Countywide Planning Policies, as 114 shown by Attachment 1 to Ordinance 14655, are hereby ratified on behalf of the 115 population of unincorporated King County. 116 Q. The amendments to the King County 2012 - Countywide Planning Policies, as 117 shown by Attachments 1 and 2 to Ordinance 14656, are hereby ratified on behalf of the 118 population of unincorporated King County. 119 R. The amendments to the King County 2012 —Countywide Planning Policies, as 120 shown by Attachment A to Ordinance 14844, are hereby ratified on behalf of the 121 population of unincorporated King County. • 122 S. The amendments to the King County 2012 - Countywide Planning Policies, as 123 shown by Attachments A, B and C to Ordinance 15121, are hereby ratified on behalf of 124 the population of unincorporated King County. 6 Ordinance 15709 125 T. The amendments to the King County 2012 - Countywide Planning Policies, as *awl 26 shown by Attachment A to Ordinance 15122, are hereby ratified on behalf of the 127 population of unincorporated King County: 128 U. The amendments to the King County 2012 - Countywide Planning Policies, as 129 shown by Attachment A to Ordinance 15123, are hereby ratified on behalf of the 130 population of unincorporated King County. 131 V. The amendments to the King County 2012 - Countywide Planning Policies, as 132 shown by Attachments A and B to Ordinance 15426, are hereby ratified on.behalf of the 133 population of unincorporated King County. 134 W. The amendments to the King County 2012 - Countywide Planning Policies, slaw 7 Ordinance 15709 135 as shown by Attachments A, B and C to this ordinance, are hereby ratified on behalf of 136 the population of unincorporated King County. 137 Ordinance 15709 was introduced on 2/5/2007 and passed by the Metropolitan King County Council on 4/9/2007, by the following vote: Yes: 9 - Mr. Gossett, Ms. Patterson, Ms. Lambert, Mr. von Reichbauer, Mr. Dunn, Mr. Ferguson, Mr. Phillips, Ms. Hague and Mr. Constantine No: 0 Excused: 0 KING COUNTY COUNCIL KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON 41 .97,... eit Larry Gossett, Chair ATTEST: Anne Noris,Clerk of the Council c _ -1' --,D -----: APPROVED this I3 day of Aele-A<— ,2007. ---).) ‘,..' c...1) aF, Ron Sims,County Executive Attachments A.Motion No.06-1--Dated April 26,2006, B. Motion No. 06-2--Dated April 26, 2006, C. Motion No. 06-03--Dated September 20, 2006 NIS 8 15709 2OO6578 4/26/06 Attachment A Sponsored By: Executive Committee /pr 1 MOTION NO. 06-1 2 A MOTION to amend the interim Potential Annexation Area 3 map in the Countywide Planning Policies. 4 5 6 7 WHEREAS,Countywide Planning Policies LU-31 and LU-32 anticipate the collaborative 8 designation of Potential Annexation Areas(PAA) and the eventual annexation of these 9 areas by cities. 10 11 WHEREAS,the attached PAA map amendment removes one of the largest unincorporated • 12 urban areas not within the PAA of any city and adds this area to the City of Renton PAA. 13 14 WHEREAS, the attached PAA map amendment is supported by the City of Renton and 15 King County. 16 17 BE IT RESOLVED THAT THE GROWTH MANAGEMENT PLANNING COUNCIL OF 18 KING COUNTY HEREBY MOVES AS FOLLOWS: 19 20 21 1. Amend the Interim Potential Annexation Area Map by including the area known as 22 West Hill, shown on attachment A of this motion,within the Potential Annexation 23 Area of the City of Renton. 24 25 2. This amendment is recommended to the Metropolitan King County Council and the 26 Cities of King County for adoption and ratification. 27 28 ADOPTED by the Growth Management Planning Council of King County on 29 April 26, 2006 in open session and ed by the chair of the GMPC. 30 31 32 33 Ron ims,Chair, Growth Mari gement Planning Council 34 - 1 - 15709 Attachment A N Interim PAA Amendment 0 King County The H« +wa.e.�M.�u;P..Ins.�nSa ay King Canty eat tom v.*a....".aM kayrb.t .. <Nt.ut..i.. Kms Canb nwt n. r.pr..nvicts « (m.in et wade b to use d f,w,s0.4 a. Ions Can.ehaPAA Boundary •., net be Lade Sr+M n..f«1.Wd+t.S in onddt. R �.epusfd d.n.s.. SWI •. W6.na ir. b. I.G wsnrRiR,es .n tN.ius,ed AM' w0 d his mlV« Hafm.Im a M.mQ k RdIH.A.soRbT'f^M1fen p.rnid.n a L.-:_-___; Incorporated Areas d5 825 0 1.10et WL . _ .fiY -•- ' •'••.•• .• '' ' ' " '•''''.- '• 'k 1WL �m..1iM 0Rc�]OQl�2.W.IY PMJ�rdwwM { R I f'1 I Min ii-: :-; .: - '''''.1-;', ' "- '''' '.-.''';' .,-_ ; , • . ' ' 1 ,; I 1 r < <_; _ - - — - iiiik -,, -, __„_,_ _ _ 1 , . , :'' ' :'''.:' rsr SOYIY tr gm- _ Ikk. ! 1 Li _ _ '� C.yI% - _ .6, ., .,, _ __-- A ' —- - - - ' I 1 f A 11111.1 —= 1 mid _h:::,- i„,-;,-.., a *'Nigia-,co' it,; ',.;_- , ',::,,,' i. ,.. .'se ,,,,,,-„,---_E , �,,� S/ate - S=.ar b-' _ _ .Y' =tamEngin + ,f , . , . -.,----- 11 simmerwillemmik a �P Efine - V _gagt,lYM19 ' _< - 9IMA �, iM4 �� ST _ i - NS . 4I IN- IIPY t lmn u z 1 "Et Ill% -_ -- km C �-r — III ls„,, toili,...Area to be N,---,,,,added to11111124m."'"' : =f __ _=__ in r;ii 1 _ _ ,, _ __ _ ________ ' ._Eli,--_--_------_--__- _--, _____ t City of Renton's PAA ��MI s, giviiiii _-- _ _ s,a.o :4474. Nr-p.... pi vw gg il i: 0 _._ _- 6 i arimp ii.:,%.,,,_,:_-1,:- -, m& wig I#\. w+r F ST.AY-tr a : 401:i _=_.: _.--_-_. -.-.iMq Sf_ 44.4 .... ,_ _- _,.. SSu/S, li 1 _ _ii-00° tt sra.yc t(kik 3 _ wsri d 1 5 7 49 OO6578 lob „r Attachment B April 26,2006 Sponsored By: Executive Committee /pr • MOTION NO. 06-2 2 A MOTION by the Growth Management Planning Council of King 3 County recommending the amendment of the Countywide Planning 4 Policies by revising existing policy LU-25b to allow adjustment of 5 household and employment targets if a new municipal incorporation 6 occurs within a designated Potential Annexation Area(PAA). 7 8 "WHEREAS, in accordance with the Growth Management Act(GMA), the Countywide 9 Planning Policies establish a household and employment target for each city and 10 for unincorporated Urban designated King County through 2022; and 11 12 WHEREAS, Countywide Planning Policy LU-25b states that the adopted household and •• 13 employment targets shall be adjusted as annexations occur within a Potential Annexation 14 Area,but no similar provision is made if a municipal incorporation occurs within a PAA. Sow, 15 THE GROWTH MANAGEMENT PLANNING COUNCIL OF KING COUNTY 16 HEREBY MOVES AS FOLLOWS: 17 . 18 Amend Sections III. C. of the King County Countywide Planning Policies as follows: 19 20 21 LU25b As annexations or incorporations occur, growth targets shall be adjusted. 22 Household and employment targets for each jurisdiction's potential 23 annexation area, as adopted in Table LU-1, shall be transferred to the 24 annexing jurisdiction or newly incorporated city as follows: 25 26 a. King County and the respective city will determine new household 27 and employment targets for areas under consideration for 28 annexation prior to the submittal of the annexation proposal to the 29 King County Boundary Review Board; 30 b. A city's household and employment targets shall be increased by a 31 share of the target for the potential annexation area proportionate to 32 the share of the potential annexation area's development capacity 33 located within the area annexed. In the case of incorporation, an 34 equivalent formula shall be used to establish household and 35 employment targets for the new city. Each city will determine how 36 and where within their corporate boundaries to accommodate the 37 target increases; - 1 - 1- 57o9 1 c. The County's target shall be correspondingly decreased to ensure 2 that overall target levels in the county remain the same; 3 d. The household and employment targets in Table LU-1 will be 4 updated periodically to reflect changes due to annexations or 5 incorporations. These target updates do not require adoption by the 6 Growth Management_Planning Council. 7 8 9 ADOPTED by the Growth Management Planning Council of King County on April 246 10 20026 in open session. 11 12 - 13 , 14 , • 15 Ri Sims, Chair, Growth Management Planning Council 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 - 2 - 157091' . ' 2 0 0 - 7 4 ',owe 9/20/06 Attachment C Sponsored By: Executive Committee /pr 1 MOTION NO. 06-03 2 A MOTION to amend the Countywide Planning Policies by 3 designating the Overlake area of Redmond as an Urban 4 Center. Overlake is added to the list of Urban Centers 5 following Countywide Planning Policy LU-39. 6 7 8 9 WHEREAS, a goal of the Growth Management Act is to encourage development in Urban 10 Areas where adequate public facilities exist or can be provided in an efficient manner; 11 12 WHEREAS,Policy LU-39 of the Countywide Planning Policies of King County describes 13 the criteria for Urban Center designation; 14 15 WHEREAS,Policy LU-40 of the Countywide Planning Policies of King County describes 16 standards for planned land uses within Urban Centers; 17 18 WHEREAS, the City of Redmond has demonstrated that Overlake meets the criteria for 19 designation as an Urban Center; and 20 21 WHEREAS, King County Comprehensive Plan Policy U-108 supports the development of 22 Urban Centers to meet the region's needs for housing,jobs,services, culture and recreation 23 and to promote health. 24 25 BE IT RESOLVED THAT THE GROWTH MANAGEMENT PLANNING COUNCIL OF 26 KING COUNTY HEREBY MOVES AS FOLLOWS: 27 28 29 1. The Overlake area of Redmond is designated as an Urban Center. The list of Urban 30 Centers following Countywide Planning Policy LU-39 is modified to include Overlake. 31 32 2. This amendment is recommended to the Metropolitan King County Council and the 33 Cities of King County for adoption and ratification. 34 35 36 - 1 - 157O9 „ims 1 ADOPTED by the Growth Management Planning Council of King County on 2 September 20,2006 in open session and signed by the chair of the GMPC. 3 Lt 6 °on �air,Growth Manages ent Planning Council 7 - 2 - m Ak . 0 fala/!•U/all 9 _... . A. 157O9 NNW' � '� woUUllnune: ;•0} �iawy� ■ ■•�p� �IlOglll+ �i/■ aft/U�I,�/l1//11f Oi ili ii s, ��i1111 I 1�1��IIO NE ■■•�rill 0, rP,y .1 ... r �■�• r • X11;-�,: �r11•i•Ii!i•l\��'1�•��•�•�,7- dilli,��. _• .;j: .11111.sr; 4.I ��•�• :•NE5ISTST I �inlia��.01 . �<�1•r•��,�•�•0 �. ,1',%ill C��.lr I�,.;�,��.�•/��\i `� ol. 4reitli „frit , ii L.► '!j atO r ■ n11 i1111111t Inr: tIVL A % aaa\ J m �. 1 � r•uI' 1q► • •p1�i�� ,1111 1■.•ll� .k..."`� `�1� !FIV.-210...1011...A� pm i■\�,,,,10 1 si lir \\ ■.■ 111\\ t/�,•i.las& •� -..-■ �\ M �� Maria u► v IINE 40TH ST ..--.` N\C% \ •40TH ST I 11111121:11.1." �-ill•uI`�A ♦. I■ME I ( '�� j0 �_. __Y Ort.�r."I�fa a■.!NE 40TH ST �I 'o_"' aims 111111111. ■■■' o \el\\ \:' �\° •\ l IPI z MUM_.• MIMI "\A v.Z \\i� ■111111►•.- !!! .� `��1 `\i\ I',\` uun•� j King County ?� ^ , ; Dnt , j Ron Sims ‘41ftrr King County Executive 1` < ` l ^f 701 Fifth Avenue, Suite 3210 • ' rSeattle, WA 98104 206-296-4040 Fax 206-296-0194 TTY Relay: 711 0 0 - 5 7 8 www.metrokc.gov2 November 20, 2006 CM.MATildiU The Honorable Larry Phillips Chair, King County Council I' - Room 1200 COURTHOUSE Dear Councilmember Phillips: I am pleased to submit to you an ordinance that will adopt motions that have been approved by the Growth Management Planning Council (GMPC). Under the interlocal agreement that established the GMPC, a motion is first approved by GMPC. King County Council must then approve the motion and ratify it for the unincorporated area. Finally, the motion is sent to all of the cities in -*4400, King County for ratification. There are no fiscal impacts to King County government as a result of these motions. The attached three motions are the result of regional cooperation. Each received unanimous approval by the Growth Management Planning Council. One of these motions amends the Countywide Planning Policies interim potential annexation areas (PAA) map to add the area known as West 11111 to the PAA for the city of Renton. The annexation of the West Hill area is one of the highest priorities Of the King County Annexation Initiative. In 2005, King County supported a community governance study that resulted in a recommendation by area residents to join Renton. Earlier this month, I transmitted to you an interlocal agreement (ILA) between King County and Renton that establishes the goal to have the nearly 15,000 residents that live in the West Hill area annexed by Renton before January 2009. The fiscal impact of this action was analyzed in a fiscal note attached to the legislation authorizing the ILA. The second motion makes a correction to Countywide Planning Policy LU-25b to allow adjustment of growth targets as new incorporations occur in King County. The third motion amends the Countywide Planning Policies by designating Overtake as an Urban Center, recognizing Redmond's efforts to plan for future redevelopment under the Growth Management Act. i570 9 I*• King County is an Equal Opportunity/Affirmative AG7,ibu Employer •• oM and complies with the Americans with Dis_ahe ties Act The Honorable Larry Phillips November 20, 2006 Page 2 My staff is available to assist the council in its review of these GMPC motions. Please contact Stephanie Warden, Director, Department of Development and Environmental Services(DDES), at 206-296-6700, for further information regarding this transmittal. Sincerely, on Sims King County Executive Enclosures cc: King County Councilmembers ATTN: Ross Baker, Chief of Staff Shelley Sutton, Policy Staff Director Anne Noris, Clerk of the Council Bob Cowan, Director, Office of Management and Budget Stephanie Warden, Director, Department of Development and Environmental Services Paul Reitenbach, Senior Policy Analyst, Department of Development and Environmental ,44604 Services Metropolitan King County Council Growth Management and Natural Resources Committee Staff Report Agenda Item: 3 Name: Rick Bautista Proposed Ord: 2006-0578 Date: February 27, 2007 Adopting GMPC Motions 06-1, 06-2 and 06-3 Attending: Paul Reitenbach, DDES SUBJECT: Adopting amendments to the Countywide Planning Policies to adjust the potential annexation area (PAA) for the city of Renton, adjust growth targets as a result of incorporations within existing city PAAs, and to designate the Overlake area of Redmond as an Urban Center. BACKGROUND: The Growth Management Planning Council and Countywide Planning Policies The Growth Management Planning Council (GMPC) is a formal body comprised of elected officials from King County, Seattle, Bellevue, the Suburban Cities, and Special Districts. The GMPC was created in 1992 by interlocal agreement, in response to a provision in the Washington State Growth Management Act (GMA) requiring cities and counties to work together to adopt Countywide Planning Policies (CPPs). Under GMA, countywide planning policies serve as the framework for each individual 'Noe jurisdiction's comprehensive plan, and ensure countywide consistency with respect to land use planning efforts. As provided for in the interlocal agreement, the GMPC developed and recommended the CPPs, which were adopted by the King County Council and ratified by the cities. Subsequent amendments to the CPPs follow the same process: recommendation by the GMPC, adoption by the King County Council, and ratification by the cities. Amendments to the CPPs become effective when ratified by ordinance or resolution by at least 30% of the city and county governments representing at least 70% of the population of King County. A city shall be deemed to have ratified an amendment to the CPPs unless, within 90 days of adoption by King County, the city by legislative action disapproves it. SUMMARY: Proposed Ordinance 2006-0578 would adopt the following three motions (06-1, 06-2 and 06-3) approved by the GMPC in April and September 2006: • GMPC Motion 06-1 would amend the interim Potential Annexation Area (PAA) for the City of Renton. • GMPC Motion 06-2 would make a correction to CPP Policy LU-25b to allow adjustment of growth targets if new municipal incorporations occur within designated PAAs. • GMPC Motion 06-3 would amend the CPP Policy LU-39by adding Overlake to the list of Urban Centers. The ordinance would also ratify the change on behalf of the population of unincorporated King County, as required by Countywide Planning Policy FW-1, Step 9. fir% GMPC MOTION 06-1 (MAP AMENDMENT: CITY OF RENTON PAA) The unincorporated urban area of"West Hill" is located between the cities of Renton, Seattle and Tukwila and is currently located outside of the mapped PAA of any of these three cities. Over the course of the past ten years, the West Hill community has been exploring governance options, which have included annexation into one or more of the three adjacent cities or incorporation as a new city. King County has conducted two governance studies during that period to analyze financial and service delivery issues for each of the governance options. Ultimately, both studies concluded that annexation was the most viable future governance option. However, until recently none of the cities had expressed strong interest in moving forward with annexation of the area. In the past year, the Renton City Council has taken action to include the West Hill area within their PAA, thus resolving the quandary of what to do with one of the largest unincorporated urban areas remaining outside of a city PAA. Approval of Motion 06-1 would recognize the action of the Renton City Council and is consistent with the Growth Management Act, applicable Countywide Planning Policies, the King County Comprehensive Plan, and the City of Renton Comprehensive Plan. GMPC MOTION 06-2 TARGET ADJUSTMENTS FOR INCORPORATIONS WITHIN PAAS) The Countywide Planning Policies (CPPs) establish household and job growth targets for cities, Potential Annexation Areas (PAAs), and unclaimed urban unincorporated areas. Anticipating the eventuality of changing jurisdictional boundaries in King County, particularly the shifting of unincorporated urban areas to city jurisdiction, the CPPs contain policies such as LU- 25b which specifically establishes a formula for adjusting growth targets upon annexation of urban unincorporated areas by cities. The formula is based on a proportionality of land use capacity in annexed areas, and ensures that cities take on additional target levels commensurate with the capacity to accommodate jobs and housing in the areas that are annexed. Given the frequency of annexations and the formula-based target adjustment called for, LU-25b also makes the adjustment process an administrative rather than a legislative action. The city of Renton had initiated the proposed revision to LU-25b to make explicit that the policy applies equally to new incorporations (versus just annexations), in large measure because the Renton PAA contains the Fairwood area, which had been under study for potential incorporation. Since that time, the proposed incorporation failed to be approved by voters of the proposed city. Although the incorporation of the Fairwood area ultimately failed, the revision to LU-25b would ensure that, in any case where a new city incorporation occurs within the PAA of an existing city, the growth targets for the existing city would be adjusted commensurate with land use capacity for lands remaining in the PAA of the existing city GMPC MOTION 06-3(URBAN CENTER DESIGNATION: OVERLAKE) The City of Redmond initiated the request to amend the CPP LU-39 to add its Overlake area to the list of Urban Centers. The city has followed the process for obtaining such a designation, starting with amending its own plans, policies and capital improvement programs, and secured the recommendation of approval for Motion 06-3 on September 20, 2006 by the Growth Management Planning Council. A complete analysis of the city's proposal as presented to the GMPC is included as Attachment 2 to this staff report. The CPPs describe Urban Centers as areas of concentrated employment and housing, with direct service by high-capacity transit and a wide range of other land uses. Collectively, they are expected to account for up to one half of King County's employment growth and one quarter of household growth over the next 20 years. The list of Urban Centers in Countywide Planning Policy LU-39 currently includes: • Bellevue CBD • Downtown Auburn `— • Downtown Burien • Federal Way CBD • Kent CBD • Redmond CBD • Renton CBD • Seattle CDD • Seattle Center • First Hill/Capitol Hill • University District • Northgate • SeaTac CBD • Tukwila CBD • Totem Lake • South Lake Union In order to be designated as an Urban Center, jurisdictions must meet specific criteria in the Countywide Planning Policies, including having planned land uses to accommodate: • A minimum of 15,000 jobs within one-half mile of a transit center; • At a minimum, an average of 50 employees per gross acre; and • At a minimum, an average of 15 households per acre. In addition to these requirements, Policy LU-40 states that fully realized Urban Centers shall be characterized by the following: Now • Clearly defined geographic boundaries; • An intensity/density of land uses sufficient to support effective and rapid transit; • Pedestrian emphasis within the Center; • Emphasis on superior urban design which reflects the local community; • Limitations on single-occupancy vehicle usage during peak commute hours; • A broad array of land uses and choices within those land uses for employees and residents; • Sufficient public open spaces and recreational opportunities; and • Uses which provide both daytime and nighttime activities in the Center. Specific factors leading to the GMPC action are that: • Overlake is well positioned within the regional transportation network, adjacent to SR-520 and within 3 miles of 1-405 and can support extension of high capacity transit across Lake Washington on both 1-90 and SR 520 with service to urban centers in Downtown Bellevue, Overtake and Downtown Redmond, specifically: • The proposed Overlake Urban Center includes a transit center at SR 520 and NE 40th Street and at 152"d Avenue NE and NE 26th Street. METRO, Sound Transit and Community Transit provide service to the area via these transit centers. • Sound Transit's long range plan identifies a fixed-guideway transit system extending; across Lake Washington on both 1-90 and SR 520 with connections to Bellevue, Overtake and Downtown Redmond. For purposes of the initial Phase 2 financial, analysis, Sound Transit is using a representative alignment that includes the 1-90 crossing and then through Bellevue to Overlake and to Downtown Redmond. Within Overlake, the representative alignment extends along 152nd Avenue NE and SR 520, with stations at or in the vicinity of the existing Overtake transit centers. These station locations would reinforce the vision for mixed-use development in the area, significantly improve travel options for people who work or live in the area, and help spur redevelopment in the Overlake shopping center area. • Redmond has a strong Commute Trip Reduction program. Overlake includes 18 companies that are affected by the Commute Trip Reduction (CTR) law, and they are already achieving the City's goal for use of modes other than driving alone. Currently, 25 • percent of people who work for these employers use modes other than driving alone, which is on track to meet the 2012 goal of 30 percent non-single occupant vehicle (SOV). Employers use a variety of methods to improve the non-SOV mode share including private shuttles, reserved parking for carpools and vanpools, transit and vanpool subsidies, bicycle parking and flexible work schedules. • The City's Transportation Master Plan provides clear direction and standards for improving the environment for pedestrians and bicyclists accessing the Overlake Urban Center. The TMP also sets out the strategy for funding these improvements and for monitoring progress. • Overlake is recognized regionally as a growth center and when compared to urban centers in King County, is second for total employment only to three Seattle urban centers: Downtown, 1st Hill/Capitol Hill, and University District (based on King Count 2005 Benchmarks Report). In terms of existing multi-family dwellings, Overlake compares favorably to a number of the designated urban centers in the central Puget Sound region. • As of 2004, an estimated 36,600 people worked within the proposed Overlake Urban Center, which equates to 72 jobs per gross acre. Under the Microsoft Development Agreement, an additional 1.5 million square feet of commercial floor area (net) will be constructed east of SR 520 within the Overlake Urban Center. With this development, the number of people working in the Overlake Center is expected to reach 44,800 by 2022, or 87 jobs per gross acre_ Based on the current rate of employment growth, Redmond expects to reach this employment level earlier than 2022. • As of 2005, the Overlake Urban Center contained nearly 770 dwelling units. Redmond has the capacity under current zoning to accommodate the urban center criteria of 15 households per acre and has based its adopted growth targets on increasing the amount of housing in this area to nearly 2,300 dwellings by 2022. This future density is within the range of long-range densities planned for other designated urban centers in the central Puget Sound region. • Redmond's Comprehensive Plan, development standards, and capital improvement plans address a number of the other strategies listed in CPP LU-45. The City's policies and standards emphasize the importance of designing buildings and sites to not only be attractive but also to encourage walking and bicycling. • Redmond's Plan also recognizes that providing open spaces and recreational opportunities within the Overlake shopping area is a high priority. Finally, Redmond has also worked closely with Bellevue through the Bel-Red Overlake Transportation Study (BROTS) in order to identify and implement needed transportation improvements to improve mobility in the Overlake area. ATTAC ENTS: 1. Prop ed Ordinance 2006-0074 with attached GMPC Motions 2. GMPC ff reports for Motions 06-1, 06-2 and 06-3 CITY OF RENTON COUNCIL AGENDA BILL CAI#: ' 0 s l Submitting Data: Transportation Systems For Agenda of: Nasoi Dept/Div/Board. Planning/Building/Public Works June 25, 2007 Staff Contact.... Ryan Plut, Project Manager(x7372) Agenda Status Consent X Subject: Public Hearing.. Correspondence.. Teufel Landscape Wetland Maintenance Contract Ordinance (Oakesdale Avenue SW Wetland Phases I and II) Resolution Old Business Exhibits: New Business Issue Paper Study Sessions Contract Agreement Information Recommended Action: Approvals: Legal Dept X Council Concur Finance Dept Risk Management X Fiscal Impact: (Account number 317.012187) Expenditure Required... $29,294.10 Transfer/Amendment Amount Budgeted $98,000 (2007) Revenue Generated Total Project Budget City Share Total Project.. SUMMARY OF ACTION: To meet all parameters for the Oakesdale Project set by the Washington State Department of Ecology and the Corps of Engineers, the 1.43 acres of existing emergent (pool cattail)property must be converted into a scrub shrub forested area. For this process to take hold, all invasive species must remain below 10 percent of the total population. Furthermore, greater than 60 percent of the native herbaceous species and greater than 80 percent of the woody plant species must survive after the fifth year of monitoring. The work performed by Teufel Landscaping will include trimming of invasive plants to keep them from shading and overcrowding the buffer area shrubs. The maintenance performed will also aid in the prevention of the invasive plants from reaching into or colonizing the mitigation area. Funding for this work is authorized from 2007-2012 TIP #41, Environmental Monitoring Program. The 2007 budget is $98,000. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Execute the landscape maintenance contract agreement for Oakesdale Avenue SW Wetland Phase I and II with Teufel Landscape for $29,294.10. H:Trans/Admin/Agenda2007/Teufel Landscape Maintenance Contract \`S O PLANNINGBUILDING/ ;; , PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT •se •NTO MEMORANDUM DATE: June 25, 2007 TO: Toni Nelson, President Member of the Renton City Council VIA: j- .-Kathy Keolker, Mayor 1 FROM: Gregg Zimmerma Wiministrator STAFF CONTACT: Ryan Plut, Project Manager, x7372 SUBJECT: Teufel Landscape Wetland Maintenance Contract (Oakesdale Avenue SW Wetland Phases I and II) ISSUE: Should the City contract with Teufel Landscape to perform monthly vegetation maintenance around the wetland ponds along Oakesdale Avenue SW? err: RECOMMENDATION: Execute the landscape maintenance contract agreement for Oakesdale Avenue SW Wetland Phases I and II with Teufel Landscape for $29,294.10. BACKGROUND: To meet all parameters for the Oakesdale Project set by the Washington State Department of Ecology and the Corps of Engineers, the 1.43 acres of existing emergent (pool cattail) property must be converted into a scrub shrub forested area. For this process to take hold, all invasive species must remain below 10 percent of the total population. Furthermore, greater than 60 percent of the native herbaceous species and greater than 80 percent of the woody plant species must survive after the fifth year of monitoring. Osborne Pacific Group (Wetland Monitoring Consultant) and the City of Renton conduct periodic field visits to study the progress of the emerging species. Due to the fast rate of growth of the invasive species and the potential of prolonging full maturity of the Oakesdale wetland site, a collective decision was agreed upon to incorporate a routine maintenance program. This will be the fifth annual maintenance contract with Teufel Landscape for this work and we are hoping for the same success we had in 2006. Toni Nelson,President Members of the Renton City Council Page 2 of 2 June 25,2007 The work performed by Teufel Landscaping will include trimming of invasive plants to keep them from shading and overcrowding the buffer area shrubs. The maintenance performed will also aid in the prevention of the invasive plants from reaching into or colonizing the mitigation area. Funding for this work is authorized from 2007-2012 TIP #41, Environmental Monitoring Program. The budget for 2007 is $98,000, which includes carry forwards. Attachments: TIP#41 cc: Peter Hahn,Deputy PBPW Administrator-Transportation Bob Hanson,Transportation Design Supervisor Ryan Plut,Transportation Design Project Manager File H\Division.s\TRANSPOR.TATADMIN\Agenda 2007\Teufel Issue Paper for maintenance 2007.doc ( ( ( . CITY OF RENTON PLANNING/BUILDING/PUBLIC WORKS TRANSPORTATION SYSTEMS DIVISION 2007-2012 SIX-YEAR TIP Environmental Monitoring Program Functional Classification: N/A Fund: 317 Proj.Length: N/A Proj: 12187 RANK: 41 CONTACT: Jason Fritzler 425.430.7243 DESCRIPTION: STATUS: Monitoring of wetland mitigation installed as a project environmental requirement and to perform biological The Year 3 report for the Oakesdale, Phase 1,site has been sent to the regulatory assessments as required by the Endangered Species Act. agencies for review. The Year 1 report for the Phase 2 site is being prepared. Phase 1 and 2 site maintenance continues. JUSTIFICATION: CHANGES: Monitoring ensures that the wetland vegetation installed is properly established. Creates an account to Attempts to get early acceptance for the Phase 1 site have been successful. The Corps of pay for unscheduled project environmental assessments. Engineers has allowed the City to reduce the monitoring requirements to match the site's success. I Funded : 1359,635 'Unfunded : 145,000 Project Totals Programmed Pre-2007 Six-Year Program ITEM Programmed Spent in 2005 2006 Total 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 EXPENSES: Project Development Precon Eng/Admin 105,000 15,000 90,000 + 15,000 15,000 15,000 15,000 15,000 15,000 R-O-W(includes Admin) Construction Contract Fee 45,000 10,000 35,000 10,000 5,000 5,000 5,000 5,000 5,000 Construction Eng/Admin 254,635 84,635 50_,000 120,000 50,000 30,000 10,000 10,000 10,000 10,000 Other TOTAL EXPENSES, 404,635 84,635 75,000 245,000 75,000 50,000 30,000 30,000 30,000 30,000 SOURCE OF FUNDS: Vehicle Fuel Tax 5,000 5,000 5,000 Business License Fee 120,035 35 20,000 100,000 20,000 25,000 17,500 12,500 10,000 15,000 Proposed Fund Balance Grants In-Hand Mitigation In-Hand 234,600 84,600 55,000 95,000 , 55,000 25,000 12,500 2,500 Bonds/L.I.D.'s Formed Other In-Hand Grants Proposed Mitigation Proposed L.I.D.'s Proposed Other Proposed Undetermined 45,000 45,000 15,000 15,000 15,000 TOTAL SOURCES 404,635_ 84,635 75,000 245,000 75,000 50,000 30,000 30,000 30,000 30,000 Ev'on OB?13/2006 940 AM 5-41 FINAL wow MUM foimi. mow mini. gni: ' ASL -, Wow' mum, +...• ......• - -^- teiR PLANNING /BUILDING /PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT CONTRACT AGREEMENT THIS AGREEMENT is made as of the 30th day of April , 2007, between the CITY OF RENTON, a municipal corporation of the State of Washington, hereinafter referred to as"CITY" and Teufel Nursery, Inc. , hereinafter referred to as "CONTRACTOR", to perform annual landscape maintenance on the Oakesdale Phase I Wetland located to the north of SW 27th Street and to the east of Oakesdale Avenue and Oakesdale Phase II Wetland located to the south of SW 27th Street and to the east of Oakesdale Avenue. The City and Contractor agree as set forth below. 1. Scope of Services. The Contractor will provide all material and labor necessary to perform all work described in the Proposal which is included with this Agreement as Attachment"A". 2. Changes in Scope of Services. The City, without invalidating the Contract, may order changes in the Services consisting of additions,deletions or modifications,the Contract Sum being adjusted accordingly. Such changes in the work shall be authorized by written Change Order signed by the City and the Contractor. 3. Time of Performance. The Contractor shall commence performance of the Contract no later than ten (10)calendar days after Contract's final execution, and shall complete the full performance of the Contract not later than 365 calendar days from the date of commencement. 4. Term Of Contract. The Term of this Agreement shall end at completion of the enclosed scope of work. This Agreement may be extended to accomplish change orders, if required, upon mutual written agreement of the City and the Contractor. 5. Contract Sum. The total amount of this Contract is the sum of Twenty Nine Thousand two hundred ninety four and ten cents, ($29,294.10), which includes Washington State Sales Tax. 6. Method of Payment. Payment by the City for the Services will only be made after the Services have been performed and a voucher or invoice is submitted in the form specified by the City. Payment will be made thirty(30)days after receipt of such voucher or invoice. The City shall have the right to withhold payment to the Contractor for any work not completed in a satisfactory manner until such time as the Contractor modifies such work so that the same is satisfactory. 7. Employment. The Contractor's employees are not employees of the City of Renton. 8. Assignment and Subcontract. The Contractor shall not assign or subcontract any portion of this Contract without express written consent of the City of Renton. 9. Record Keepingand Reporting. The Contractor shall maintain accounts and records, which properly reflect all direct and indirect costs expended and services provided in the performance of this Agreement. The Contractor agrees to provide access to any records required by the City. • 10. Hold Harmless. The Contractor shall indemnify and hold the City, its officers, employees, agents and representative harmless from any and all claims, demands and actions based upon or arising out of alleged errors,omissions or acts of negligence of the Contractor or its associates, employees, sub- contractors or other agents while performing service under this Agreement. It is understood and agreed that the Contractor's general liability insurance policies defend, or shall be endorsed to defend, the City from claims of bodily injury and/or property damage arising out of any alleged acts of negligence of the Contractor or its associates, employees, sub-contractors or other agents while performing services under this Agreement. "It is specifically understood that the indemnification provided herein constitutes the contractor's waive of immunity under the Industrial Insurance Act, Title 51 RCW solely for the purposes of this indemnification. This waiver has been mutually negotiated by the parties. The provisions of this section shall survive the expiration or termination of this Agreement." 11. insurance. The Contractor shall maintain throughout the duration of this contract the following insurance requirements: General Liability insurance in the amount of$1,000,000 per occurrence/$2,000,000 aggregate; Professional Liability insurance in the amount of$1,000,000 per claim;Automobile Liability in the amount of$1,000,000 per accident; and proof of Workers' Compensation coverage. The City of Renton will be named as a PRIMARY&NON-CONTRIBUTORY Additional Insured on the insurance policy and an endorsement stating such shall be provided. 12. Compliance with Laws. The Contractor and all of the Contractor's employees shall perform the services in accordance with all applicable federal, state, county and city laws,codes and ordinances. 13. Conflicts. In the event of any inconsistencies between contractor proposals and this contract, the City of Renton contract shall prevail. Now 14. Prevailing Wage Rates. By executing this Contact, the Contractor agrees to comply with the State prevailing wage requirements as set forth in the Contract Documents. This Agreement is entered into as of the day and year written above. 'ONT• " TOR CITY OF RENTON tt` ti .._ • Signature Signature .Je •h• on—Maintenance Mana•er Kathy Keolker, Mayor Printed Name and Title Printed Name and Title Teufel Nursery, Inc. Business Name Attest 24202 Fraser Road.South Bonnie I.Walton, City Clerk Mailing Address Printed Name and Title Kent WA 98032 City State Zip (253)373-0344 None ONMENTAL SOLUTION G 0 SINCE OAKSDALE MITIGATION WETLAND PHASE I "Attachment A" Phase I Site: 1. Poison hemlock is the main invasive plant needing intense and persistent control/eradication activities. The application of herbicides at the maximum strength and the maximum frequency consistent with the herbicide manufacturers recommendations will be employed. Attention towards eradication of this noxious and listed invasive plant is suggested. Maintenance activities have addressed this plant in the past, but not with the persistence necessary for complete eradication. Poison hemlock is located along the Oakesdale Ave. shoulder,along the edges of the pipeline ROW between the north and south areas, and on the south side of the island; however, eradication of hemlock anywhere on the site is included in this task. 2. The area between the 2 pools in the north area needs the blackberry and reed canarygrass treated during each monthly visit. The patch of reed canarygrass at the southeastern corner of the north pond needs eradication. Digging the plants with follow up herbicide treatment will be used in this case. 3. The southern side of the island in the north pond area needs control of blackberry, bindweed (morning glory), nightshade, reed canarygrass,and poison hemlock during each monthly maintenance visit. 4. Reed canarygrass along the northern and northeastern edges of the north pond needs to be trimmed back leaving a minimum 3 foot wide strip along the edge where the grasses are trimmed flush with the ground. 5. The large patch of blackberry in the northwestern corner of the southern pond area is not officially in the mitigation area and does not need to be in the mitigation area maintenance program. 6. The schedule for trimming activities for the Phase I site can be changed to quarterly visits. 24202 Fraaer Road S, Kent, WA 98032 Phone: 253-373-0344 Fax: 253-373-0345 www.teufel.com err ANNUAL LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE OAKSDALE AVE WETLAND PHASE I 1. Annual Landscape Management—Per Teufel Landscape Specifications. Annual Landscape Management Monthly Yearly Oaksdale Wetland Phase 1-May 07 through Dec 07 $ 1,700.00 $ 13,600.00 Sub-Total $ 1,700.00 $ 13,600.00 N "' WSST @ 8.9% $ 151.30 $ 1,210.40 GRAND TOTAL $ 1,851.30 $ 14,810.40 2. Scope of Work: • See enclosed City of Renton Frequency Schedule. • See enclosed City of Renton Maintenance Specification. 3. Exclusions: • Irrigation • New Plantings and Mulch Rings. Proposed as additional work. Proposal Approval Date • ONMENTAL SOLUTIONS A 4 - 0,9 SINCE OAKSDALE MITIGATION WETLAND PHASE II "Attachment A" Phase II Site: 1. Quarterly maintenance visits provide satisfactory conditions on the Phase II site. 2. The grasses on the bottom area will be trimmed to 3" to 6" long at each maintenance visit. 3. Blackberry, bindweed (morning glory), nightshade, reed canarygrass,and poison hemlock on the tree berms will be controlled by trimming, digging, or herbicide at each maintenance visit. 4. Reed canarygrass clumps and patches will be dug out, follow up applications of herbicide will be applied. 5. The small area of poison hemlock on the eastern side of the entry area needs to be maintained with the same frequency and methodology as on the Phase I site. An experiment using a 3" deep layer of medium bark mulch over a 6'x6' area will be employed. 6. Many small new plants will be installed as part of the 2007 revegetation plan. Teufel will utilize techniques that will not damage these plants. Flagging each plant, bark rings around the bases of all ,,d plants, and string trimmers with a guard around the front are techniques that have worked in the past,and will be utilized in 2007 when these plants are installed. Additional plantings and mulch rings are not included within this pricing and will be proposed as additional work. Osborn Pacific will be responsible to establish a list of material and the time frame for its installation. 24202 Frager Road S, Kent, WA 98032 Phone: 253-373-0344 Fax: 253-373-0345 www.teufel.com Nirow ANNUAL LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE OAKSDALE AVE WETLAND PHASE II 1. Annual Landscape Management—Per Teufel Landscape Specifications. Annual Landscape Management Quarterly April/May 2007 $ 4,320.00 June/July 2007 $ 2,880.00 August/Sep 2007 $ 2,880.00 Oct/Nov 2007 $ 3,220.00 Sub-Total $ 13,300.00 WSST @ 8.9% $ 1,183.70 GRAND TOTAL $ 14,483.70 2. Scope of Work: • See enclosed City of Renton Frequency Schedule. • See enclosed City of Renton Maintenance Specification. 3. Exclusions: • Irrigation. • New Plantings and Mulch Rings. Proposal as additional work. Proposal Approval Date 'o.r ANNUAL LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE OAKSDALE AVE WETLAND PHASE I & PHASE II SUMMARY 1. Annual Landscape Management—Per Teufel Landscape Specifications. May 07 June 07 July 07 Aug 07 Sep 07 Oct 07 $6,020.00 $1,700.00 $4,580.00 $1,700.00 $4,580.00 $1,700.00 Nov 07 Dec 07 Sub Total WSST Total $4,920.00 $1,700.00 $26,900.00 $2,394.10 $29,294.10 2. Scope of Work: • See enclosed City of Renton Frequency Schedule. • See enclosed City of Renton Maintenance Specification. 3. Exclusions: • Irrigation. • New Plantings and Mulch Rings. Proposal as additional work. Proposal Approval Date SITE MAP OAK- WETLAND MITIGATION PHASE I AND PHASE II ?3} e� kM' rt { 'tet - 44-, S '$ g 4. '� P 1t .. �.. _ 333 �` 2`�s "`s r »� % . iv, 1,--7,,,;4-it S k #,,,T, ,,4.14,'. i "C3k l``` i'' ,,'1 �f4.k sY si �L ,}k #.. "',+ 1,' S ' ..;,..::'1"--f"'!'',7',: wKt" �� a -t +em` " 'Ka",.- x ' ' `sem .t ""y. ,^e.:F•.' '` � -� >x ? ,'a 11, 1 p a x ,1 i ;,„ ,, ,i.„;,-,:. &, • r �' " b-. i i 3i y, 4 4. a. 1 I,,i`) ;iii,' ;27-.' ''''2,-.-44;',..;',, l''' 1 :1""---?tEirj,''1 i' .. .,4p. _ Niew 3 &y fix y T a r-, t,.. .. .. : ,.. 1 ,,,,, ,,.I .. . . , , ... 4..ti A --... =>- , ,'.,',7,.. "'4' I,',.: 4 ik s s b ,,-. - ,. r4--"k- t r : 7 #i 4 t .•3 Ek s3 a e y` r ° 1.-- , t n CITY OF RENTON COUNCIL AGENDA BILL AI#: Submitting Data: Planning/Building/Public Works For Agenda of: Dept/Div/BoardTransportation Systems June 25, 2007 Staff Contact Nathan A. Jones, x-7217 Agenda Status Consent X Subject: Public Hearing.. Commute Trip Reduction (CTR) Program Funding Correspondence.. Agreement with Washington State Department of Ordinance Transportation (WSDOT) Resolution Old Business Exhibits: New Business Issue Paper Study Sessions Resolution (forthcoming) Information Agreement Recommended Action: Approvals: Legal Dept X Council concur Finance Dept Other Fiscal Impact: (Account Number 317.012135) Expenditure Required... Transfer/Amendment... Amount Budgeted Revenue Generated.. $44,355.10 state 1111111 funding Total Project Budget $55,000 City Share Total Project. SUMMARY OF ACTION: This agreement releases state funds to support activities the City of Renton is required to do under the State of Washington Commute Trip Reduction (CTR) law. This is an ongoing program and the contract is renewed every two years. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Approve the resolution and authorize the Mayor and City Clerk to enter into the agreement with the Washington State Department of Transportation for the implementation of the Citywide CTR Program in the amount of$44,355.10. H:\Division.s\TRANSPOR.TAT\PLANNING\Nathan Jones\CTR\contracts\state\2007-2009 wsdot CTR\WSDOT CTR 07-09 AGENDA BILL.doc Cti O PLANNING/BUILDING/ + ® , PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT �• � MEMORANDUM DATE: June 25, 2007 TO: Toni Nelson, Council President Members of the Renton City Council VIA: ›/1"_Kathy Keolker, Mayor FROM: AL Gregg Zimmermaa! ministrator STAFF CONTACT: Nathan A. Jones, Transportation Planner, extension 7217 SUBJECT: Commute Trip Reduction (CTR) Program Funding Agreement with Washington State Department of Transportation (WSDOT) ISSUE: Since the State Commute Trip Reduction (CTR) law was passed in 1991, every two years the City of Renton enters into an agreement with the State of Washington Department of Now Transportation to accept funding from the state. The state funds are used to support the City efforts to carry out the activities mandated by the Washington State CTR law. RECOMMENDATION: Approve the resolution and authorize the Mayor and City Clerk to enter into the agreement with the Washington State Department of Transportation for the implementation of the Citywide CTR Program in the amount of$44,355.10. BACKGROUND: The City of Renton implements a program in accordance with the state and local CTR law to monitor Renton employers with CTR-affected worksites for progress and compliance. This law was enacted as part of the Washington State Clean Air Act to provide measures that would improve air quality and also manage congestion by encouraging the use of alternatives to single occupancy vehicle (SOV) commute travel through the use of incentives to employees at businesses with 100 or more employees arriving to work between 6:00 and 9:00 a.m. The City of Renton contracts each year with the King County Department of Transportation Metro Transit Division to provide staff to offer technical assistance to Toni Nelson, President Members of the Renton City Council June 25,2007 Page 2 of 2 Renton businesses affected by the CTR law. King County staff assists with the notification of new sites, employee surveys,program review, records maintenance, and more. The amount of the contract between the City of Renton and King County is based on the number of worksites being monitored. Currently, there are 24 CTR-affected employer work sites in the City of Renton; King County is requesting $38,060 to cover the expenses of the above-mentioned activities from July 1, 2007 to June 30, 2008. Funding provided by the State of Washington covers the expenses of the King County contract and a portion of City staff administrative labor. The Transportation Systems Division budget for Travel Demand Management(TDM) and Commute Trip Reduction (CTR) is $55,000. This covers expenses above and beyond the King County contract i.e., City of Renton staff time to monitor programs, perform reviews of the annual employer program reports, and attend trip reduction regional coordinating meetings, etc. cc: Peter Hahn,Deputy PBPW Administrator—Transportation Jim Seitz, Transportation Planning and Programming Supervisor Nathan Jones,Transportation Planner File Nimid H Divisions\TRANSPOR.TAT\PLANNING\Nathan Jones\CTR\contracts\state' 007-ZOOM wsdot_CIIt'CTRtssuepaper_WSDOT_2007-2009.doc Commute Trip Reduction Implementation Agreement Washington State CONTRACTOR Name Department of Transportation City of Renton 310 Maple Park Avenue 1055 South Grady Way PO Box 47387 Renton, WA 98055-3232 Olympia,WA 98504-7387 Key Contact Person: Nathan Jones Key Contact Person: Robin Hartsell Employer Federal ID#: 91-6001271 Agreement Start Date Completion Project Amount Project Title Number Date Commute Trip Reduction GCA5389 July 1, 2007 June 30,2009 $44,355.10 Implementation This AGREEMENT is entered into by the Washington State Department of Transportation (hereinafter referred to as "WSDOT") and the Contractor identified above (hereinafter referred to as "CONTRACTOR"), and/or individually referred to as the "PARTY" and collectively referred to as the "PARTIES." WHEREAS, RCW 70.94.527 requires counties containing urban growth areas and cities and towns with "major employers," that are located within urban growth areas with a state highway segment exceeding the threshold of one hundred person hours of delay or jurisdictions that are located in contiguous urban growth areas, or are within an urban growth area with a population greater than seventy thousand people that adopted an ordinance before the year 2000 or jurisdictions that are located in contiguous urban growth areas, or contain a major employment installation in an affected county to develop ordinances, plans and programs to reduce Vehicle `fir Miles Traveled (VMT) and Single Occupant Vehicle (SOV) commute trips, and thereby reduce vehicle-related air pollution, traffic congestion and energy use, and WHEREAS, RCW 70.94.541 (2) provides for technical assistance to counties, cities, and towns in developing and implementing Commute Trip Reduction (CTR) plans and programs, and WHEREAS, RCW 70.94.544 provides for distribution of funds for local CTR implementation efforts, and WHEREAS, WSDOT desires to achieve trip reduction in order to improve the efficiency of the state transportation system and the quality of life for citizens of the State of Washington, and WHEREAS, WSDOT hereby desires to engage and the CONTRACTOR so agrees to perforin all tasks as hereinafter agreed upon by both PARTIES, NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of covenants, conditions, performances and promises herein contained and Exhibits I, II and III, attached hereto and made a part of this AGREEMENT, the PARTIES agree to the terms and conditions following: Section 1 Purpose of Agreement The purpose of this AGREEMENT is for WSDOT to provide funding to the CONTRACTOR to be used solely for activities undertaken to fulfill the requirements of RCW 70.94.521 through .551 and to implement tasks as described in Exhibit II, Scope of Work. Page 1 of 17 GCA 5389 Section 2 Scope of Work The CONTRACTOR and WSDOT agree to perform all designated tasks under this AGREEMENT as described in Exhibit II, Scope of Work. Section 3 Time for Beginning and Completion The work to be performed under this AGREEMENT shall commence on July 1, 2007, and terminate on June 30, 2009, unless terminated sooner as provided herein. Section 4 Reimbursement and Payment WSDOT shall reimburse the CONTRACTOR for eligible expenditures not to exceed the dollar amount stipulated in the AGREEMENT header captioned `Project Amount' during the AGREEMENT period. The maximum amount of funding for the CONTRACTOR was determined using the methodology contained in Exhibit I, Funding Allocation Methodology. WSDOT will reimburse the CONTRACTOR only for actual and eligible direct and related indirect project costs. Payment will be made on a reimbursable basis. Payment is subject to the submission to and approval by WSDOT of properly prepared invoices accompanied by progress reports as provided in Section 6 and financial summaries. The CONTRACTOR shall submit an invoice (state form A-19) or WSDOT approved invoice format to WSDOT in order to receive reimbursement. The CONTRACTOR may submit invoices, not more than once per month, during the course of this AGREEMENT. The CONTRACTOR shall submit a final invoice to WSDOT no later than July 15, 2009. Any invoice received after July 15, 2009 will not be eligible for reimbursement. Within 30 days after receiving an invoice and upon approval, WSDOT shall remit payment to the CONTRACTOR. All invoices and payments shall be based on and paid on actual work performed and actual costs incurred up to the maximum amount identified in this AGREEMENT. Section 5 Project Records The CONTRACTOR agrees to establish and maintain for the project either a separate set of accounts or accounts within the framework of an established accounting system, in order to sufficiently and properly reflect all eligible direct and related indirect project costs claimed to have been incurred in the performance of this AGREEMENT. Such accounts are referred to herein collectively as the "Project Account". All costs claimed against the Project Account must be supported by properly executed payrolls, time records, invoices, contracts, and payment vouchers evidencing in sufficient detail the nature and propriety of the costs claimed. Section 6 Progress Reports The CONTRACTOR shall submit to WSDOT progress reports as described in Exhibit II, Scope of Work, so that WSDOT may adequately and accurately assess the progress made under the terms of this AGREEMENT. Progress reports shall be submitted to WSDOT along with every invoice request for reimbursement submitted pursuant to Section 4, Reimbursement and Payment. Page 2 of 17 GCA 5389 Section 7 Audits, Inspections, and Records Retention WSDOT, the State Auditor, and any of their representatives, shall have full access to and the N..+ right to examine, during normal business hours and as often as they deem necessary, all of the CONTRACTOR's records with respect to all matters covered by this AGREEMENT. Such representatives shall be permitted to audit, examine and make excerpts or transcripts from such records, and to make audits of all contracts, invoices, materials, payrolls, and other matters covered by this AGREEMENT. In order to facilitate any audits and inspections, the CONTRACTOR shall retain all documents, papers, accounting records, and other materials pertaining to this AGREEMENT for six (6) years from the date of completion of the project or the project final payment date. However, in case of audit or litigation extending past that six (6) years period, then the CONTRACTOR must retain all records until the audit or litigation is completed. The CONTRACTOR shall be responsible to assure that it, WSDOT, the State Auditor, and any of their representatives, retain comparable audit rights with respect to subcontractors to the CONTRACTOR within the scope of this AGREEMENT. Section 8 Agreement Modifications A. Either PARTY may request changes to this AGREEMENT, including changes in the Scope of Work. Such changes that are mutually agreed upon shall be incorporated as written amendments to the AGREEMENT. No variation or alteration of the terms of this AGREEMENT shall be valid unless made in writing and signed by authorized representatives of the PARTIES hereto. B. Any additional funding secured by WSDOT beyond the amount originally awarded and identified in the AGREEMENT header captioned Project Amount will be allocated to the CONTRACTOR for the period of July 1, 2008 to June 30, 2009 in accordance with the methodology described in Exhibit I, Funding Allocation Methodology. If an increase in funding by the funding source augments the CONTRACTOR's allocation of funding under this AGREEMENT, the CONTRACTOR and WSDOT agree to enter into an amendment to this AGREEMENT, providing for an appropriate change in the Scope of Work and/or the project amount in order to reflect any such increase in funding. C. If a reduction of funding by the funding source reduces the CONTRACTOR's allocation of funding under this AGREEMENT, the CONTRACTOR and WSDOT agree to enter into an amendment to this AGREEMENT providing for an appropriate change in the Scope of Work and/or the AGREEMENT amount in order to reflect any such reduction of funding. Section 9 Recapture Provision In the event that the CONTRACTOR fails to expend state funds in accordance with state law and/or the provisions of this AGREEMENT, WSDOT reserves the right to recapture state funds in an amount equivalent to the extent of noncompliance. Such right of recapture shall exist for a period not to exceed three (3) years following termination or expiration of this AGREEMENT. The CONTRACTOR agrees to repay such state funds under this recapture provision within 30 days of demand. Page 3 of 17 GCA 5389 Section 10 Disputes A. Disputes. Disputes, arising in the performance of this AGREEMENT, which are not resolved by agreement of the PARTIES, shall be decided in writing by the authorized representative of WSDOT Public Transportation and Commute Options (PT&CO) Office. If the PARTIES cannot resolve a dispute by mutual agreement, the CONTRACTOR may submit a written detailed description of the dispute to the PT&CO Program Manager who will issue a written decision within ten (10) days of receipt of the written description of the dispute. This decision shall be final and conclusive. B. Performance During Dispute. Unless otherwise directed by WSDOT, the CONTRACTOR shall continue performance under this AGREEMENT while matters in dispute are being resolved. Section 11 Termination WSDOT, at its sole discretion, may suspend or terminate this AGREEMENT in whole, or in part, for the reasons following: A. The CONTRACTOR materially breaches, or fails to perforin any of the requirements of, this AGREEMENT, and after fourteen (14) days written notice, has failed to cure the condition(s) causing that breach. Conditions of breach may include,but are not be limited to: • Any action taken by the CONTRACTOR without WSDOT approval, which under the provisions of this AGREEMENT, required WSDOT approval; • Failure to perfoini in the manner called for under this AGREEMENT; or • Failure to comply with any provision of this AGREEMENT; B. The CONTRACTOR is prevented from proceeding with the AGREEMENT by reason of a temporary preliminary, special, or permanent restraining order or injunction of a court of competent jurisdiction where the issuance of such order or injunction is primarily caused by the acts or omissions of persons or agencies other than the CONTRACTOR; C. The requisite state or federal funding is reduced or becomes unavailable through failure of appropriation or otherwise; D. WSDOT determines that the continuation of the project would not produce beneficial results commensurate with the further expenditure of funds; E. WSDOT, at its sole discretion, determines to accept a request made in writing by the CONTRACTOR to terminate the AGREEMENT in whole or in part; or F. WSDOT determines that suspension or teimination is in the best interests of the state. If this AGREEMENT is terminated under subsections B, C, D, E. and/or F of this Section, the CONTRACTOR may be reimbursed only for actual and eligible direct and related indirect expenses incurred prior to the date of termination, and then only to the extent of appropriated funds. If this AGREEMENT is terminated under subsection A of this Section, the WSDOT shall not be obligated to provide any additional reimbursement, and WSDOT shall retain all rights to seek recapture or damages from the CONTRACTOR. Section 12 Forbearance by WSDOT Not a Waiver Any forbearance by WSDOT in exercising any right or remedy hereunder, or otherwise afforded by applicable law, shall not be a waiver of or preclude the exercise of any such right or remedy. Page 4 of 17 GCA 5389 Section 13 Waiver In no event shall any WSDOT payment of grant funds to the CONTRACTOR constitute or be construed as a waiver by WSDOT of any CONTRACTOR breach, or default which and shall in no way impair or prejudice any right or remedy available to WSDOT with respect to any breach or default. In no event shall acceptance of any WSDOT payment of grant funds by the CONTRACTOR constitute or be construed as a waiver by CONTRACTOR of any WSDOT breach, or default which and shall in no way impair or prejudice any right or remedy available to CONTRACTOR with respect to any breach or default. Section 14 Independent Contractor The CONTRACTOR shall be deemed an independent CONTRACTOR for all purposes, and the employees of the CONTRACTOR or any of its subcontractors and the employees thereof, shall not in any manner be deemed to be employees of WSDOT. Section 15 WSDOT Advice The CONTRACTOR bears complete responsibility for the administration and success of the work as it is defined in this AGREEMENT and any amendments thereto. Although the CONTRACTOR is allowed to seek the advice of WSDOT, the offering of WSDOT advice shall not modify the CONTRACTOR's rights and obligations under this AGREEMENT, and WSDOT shall not be held liable for offering advice to the CONTRACTOR. Section 16 Limitation of Liability and Indemnification A. No liability shall attach to WSDOT or the CONTRACTOR by reason of entering into this AGREEMENT, except as expressly provided herein. This AGREEMENT is not intended to benefit any third party. The CONTRACTOR shall indemnify and hold WSDOT, its agents, employees, and/or officers harmless from, and shall process and defend at its own expense, any and all claims, demands, suits, penalties, losses, damages (both to persons and property), or costs of whatsoever kind or nature (hereafter "claims") brought against WSDOT arising out of or incident to the execution, performance or failure to perform under this AGREEMENT; provided, however, that if such claims are caused by or result from the concurrent negligence of (a) the CONTRACTOR, its agents, employees, and/or officers and (b) WSDOT, its agents, employees, and/or officers, this indemnity provision shall be valid and enforceable,only to the extent of the negligence of the CONTRACTOR, its agents, employees, and/or officers; and provided further that nothing herein shall require the CONTRACTOR to hold harmless or defend WSDOT, its agents, employees, and/or officers from any claims arising from the sole negligence of WSDOT, its agents, employees, and/or officers. B. The CONTRACTOR specifically assumes potential liability for actions brought by CONTRACTOR's employees and/or subcontractors and solely for the purposes of this indemnification and defense, the CONTRACTOR specifically waives any immunity under the State Industrial Insurance Law, Title 51 Revised Code of Washington. 4,4600 Page 5 of 17 GCA 5389 Section 17 Hold Harmless It is understood and agreed that this AGREEMENT is solely for the benefit of the PARTIES hereto and gives no right to any other party. No joint venture or partnership is formed as a result of this AGREEMENT. Each PARTY hereto agrees to be responsible and assumes liability for its own negligent acts or omissions, or those of its officers, agents or employees. Each agreement, contract or subcontract for services or activities to further the terms of this AGREEMENT shall include an indemnification and hold harmless clause providing that WSDOT and the State of Washington are not liable for damages or claims for damages arising from any city, town, designee or subcontractor's performance or activities under the terms of those agreements, contracts or subcontracts. Section 18 Governing Law, Venue, and Process This AGREEMENT shall be construed and enforced in accordance with, and the validity and performance thereof shall be governed by the laws of the State of Washington. In the event that either PARTY deems it necessary to institute legal action or proceedings to enforce any right or obligation under this AGREEMENT, the PARTIES hereto agree that any such action shall be initiated in the Superior Court of the State of Washington situated in Thurston County. The CONTRACTOR hereby accepts service of process by registered mail consistent with RCW 4.28.080(1). Each PARTY shall bear its own legal costs and expenses, including attorney fees, in any such litigation. Section 19 Compliance with Laws and Regulations „tag The CONTRACTOR agrees to abide by all applicable state and federal laws and regulations, including, but not limited to, those concerning employment, equal opportunity employment, nondiscrimination assurances, project record keeping necessary to evidence AGREEMENT compliance, and retention of all such records. The CONTRACTOR will adhere to all of the nondiscrimination provisions in Chapter 49.60 RCW. The CONTRACTOR will also comply with the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA), Public Law 101-336, which provides comprehensive civil rights protection to individuals with disabilities in the areas of employment public accommodations, state and local government services and telecommunication. Section 20 Section Headings All section headings are inserted for convenience only and shall not affect any construction or interpretation of this AGREEMENT. Section 21 Severability If any covenant or provision of this AGREEMENT shall be adjudged void, such adjudication shall not affect the validity or obligation of performance of any other covenant or provision, or part thereof, that in itself is valid if such remainder conforms to the terms and requirements of applicable law and the intent of this AGREEMENT. No controversy concerning any covenant or provision shall delay the performance of any other covenant or provision except as herein allowed. Page 6 of 17 GCA 5389 Section 22 Execution and Acceptance Now, This AGREEMENT may be executed in several counterparts, each of which shall be deemed to be an original having identical legal effect. The CONTRACTOR does hereby ratify and adopt all statements, representations, warranties, covenants, and agreements and their supporting materials contained and/or mentioned herein, and does hereby accept State funds and agrees to all of the terms and conditions thereof. Section 23 Execution This AGREEMENT is executed by the Director of the Public Transportation Division, State of Washington, Department of Transportation or the Director's designee, not as an individual incurring personal obligation and liability, but solely by, for, and on behalf of the State of Washington, Department of Transportation, in his/her capacity as Director of the Public Transportation Division. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the PARTIES hereto have executed this AGREEMENT the day and year first above written. WASHINGTON STATE CONTRACTOR DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION By: By: Name CATHY SILINS, Acting Director Public Transportation Division Print Name: Title: Who certifies proper authority to execute this Agreement on behalf of the CONTRACTOR Date: Date: Approved as to form only: By: Susan Cruise Assistant Attorney General %"` Date: May 22, 2007 Page 7 of 17 GCA 5389 Exhibit I ""'O/ Funding Allocation Methodology RCW 70.94.544 authorizes the CTR board to determine the allocation of program funds made available for the purpose of implementing CTR plans. The funding allocated for local implementation of CTR activities in July 1, 2007 through June 30, 2008 is based on the decision taken by the CTR board at its April 27, 2007 meeting. At that meeting, the CTR board decided to allocate funding for the period between July 1, 2007 and June 30, 2008 at the same level per county and city as the funding allocated for the period between July 1, 2006 and June 30, 2007. For the period between July 1, 2008 and June 30, 2009, funding will be allocated based on the decision of the CTR board according to its funding policy. July 1, 2007—June 30, 2008 Allocation Total County Allocation Clark $80,000 King $1,086,700 Kitsap $80,000 NIS Pierce $141,983 Snohomish $121,569 Spokane $177,759 Thurston $109,489 Whatcom $80,000 Yakima $80,000 Total $1,957,500 Page 8 of 17 (;CA 5389 EXHIBIT II SCOPE OF WORK Nov Implementation of Commute Trip Reduction (CTR) Plans and Program 1. CONTRACTOR AGREES TO: 1.1. Work to be Performed 1.1.1. The county or city, whichever applies, has enacted a Commute Trip Reduction (CTR) ordinance in compliance with RCW 70.94.521-.555. Said ordinance requires, for example, the submission of employee commuter surveys, employer annual reports, and other provisions for the tracking of certain vehicle miles traveled (VMT) and single occupant vehicle (SOV) commute trips, as well as provisions to assist in the reduction of VMT and SOV. Therefore, the CONTRACTOR agrees to implement a CTR program based on a locally adopted CTR plan and to comply with all provisions of the applicable county or city ordinance, which is incorporated herein by reference and made a part of this AGREEMENT and this Scope of Work. 1.1.2. Progress Report and Invoice 1.1.3. The CONTRACTOR agrees to submit to WSDOT periodic progress reports, as specified in Exhibit III, Progress Report Format, along with all invoices in accordance with Section 4 of this AGREEMENT. The CONTRACTOR shall accurately and completely report local investments in its CTR plans and programs as part of its progress reports. All invoices shall be complete and accurately reflect expenditures. 1.2. Funding Distribution and Reporting 1.2.1. The CONTRACTOR may distribute funds to its eligible contracting partner(s) who are implementing CTR plans and ordinances as authorized by RCW 70.94.544, by entering into agreements with other jurisdictions, local transit agencies, regional transportation planning organizations, or other eligible organizations. The CONTRACTOR shall submit to WSDOT within 30 days of execution of any agreement between the CONTRACTOR and is eligible contracting partner(s): (a) a list of dollar amounts to be disbursed by the CONTRACTOR to its eligible contracting partner(s), or (b) a fund dispersion methodology. 1.3. Implementation Plans 1.3.1. In addition to complying with Section 1, above, the CONTRACTOR shall implement all CONTRACTOR provisions in this Scope of Work. Further, the CONTRACTOR shall incorporate Sections 1.1 and 1.3 of the Scope of Work in all agreements with eligible contracting partner(s), as necessary, to coordinate the development, implementation, and administration of CTR plans and compliance with applicable ordinances. 1.3.2. Appeals, Exemptions, and Modifications 1.3.3. The CONTRACTOR shall maintain an appeals process consistent with RCW 70.94.534(6), applicable ordinances, and procedures contained in the Commute Trip Page 9 of 17 OCA 5389 411111, Reduction Guidelines. which may he obtained from the WSDOT or found at http://www.wsdot.wa.gov/tdm/. The CONTRACTOR, or its eligible contracting partner(s), shall submit requests for CTR exemptions to WSDOT for review and comment within five (5) days of receiving such requests, and shall provide WSDOT five (5) working days to comment prior to approving or denying the request. 13.4. Survey Processing 1.3.5. The CONTRACTOR shall notify WSDOT prior to sending employee commute surveys to the University of Washington, Office of Educational Assessment, for processing. The notification must include the name of the worksite, employer identification code, and type of survey for each survey being submitted for processing. The notification shall be submitted as an•electronic spreadsheet via electronic mail. The CONTRACTOR agrees not to deliver or send surveys for processing unless authorized to do so by WSDOT. 1.3.6. Survey Counts 1.3.7. The CONTRACTOR shall provide WSDOT, upon request, with an accurate estimate of the number of employee commute surveys needed by the CONTRACTOR to survey employers. 1.3.8. Survey Coordination 1.3.9. The CONTRACTOR agrees to accept employee commute surveys from Trip Reduction Performance Program (TRPP) contractors in the county or city and process the TRPP surveys according to Section 1.3.5 of this agreement. 1.3.10. Database Updates 1.3.11. The CONTRACTOR agrees to provide WSDOT with updated lists of affected worksites, employee transportation coordinators, and jurisdiction contacts as requested. The CONTRACTOR agrees to provide to WSDOT the updated physical addresses or equivalent geocode data of affected worksites as requested. These updates shall be submitted electronically in a format specified by WSDOT. 1.3.12. Planning Data 1.3.13. The CONTRACTOR agrees to provide WSDOT with the CTR program goals established for newly affected worksites when they are established by the local jurisdiction. The CONTRACTOR agrees to provide WSDOT with updated program goals for affected worksites and jurisdictions as requested. These updates shall be submitted electronically in a format specified by WSDOT. 1.3.14. Employer Annual Reports 1.3.15. The CONTRACTOR agrees to submit to WSDOT one (1) electronic or hard copy of all employer annual report(s), within 30 days from the date of approval. 1.3.16. Employer and Employee Exemptions 1.3.17. The CONTRACTOR agrees to, within 30 days from the date of official administrative decision, submit to WSDOT the name and employer identification code for any worksite that has been granted an exemption, including information about the duration of all exemptions. Page 10 of 17 GCA 5389 1.3.18. Coordination with Regional Transportation Planning Organization 1.3.19. The CONTRACTOR shall coordinate the development and implementation of its CTR plans and programs with the applicable regional transportation planning organization (RTPO). The CONTRACTOR agrees to notify the RTPO of any substantial changes to its CTR plans and programs that could impact the success of the regional CTR plan. The CONTRACTOR agrees to provide information about the progress of its CTR plans and programs to the RTPO upon request. 2. WSDOT AGREES TO: 2.1. General Technical Assistance 2.1.1. WSDOT will provide support to the CONTRACTOR, or its eligible contracting partner(s), in developing and implementing CTR plans and programs, including providing training, informational materials, and assistance in CTR evaluation. 2.2. Exemptions 2.2.1. WSDOT will review and comment on employer requests for exemptions from CTR requirements, within five (5) working days after receipt. Failure to review and comment on such requests within five (5) working days after receipt shall be considered a waiver of WSDOT's right to comment. 2.3. Database Management 2.3.1. WSDOT will maintain a current database of all affected worksites in Washington State. WSDOT will input new and/or updated worksite information within fifteen (15) working days after receipt from CONTRACTOR. WSDOT will employ a verification process to ensure all new and/or updated information is input in a timely and accurate manner. Information from the WSDOT database will be used to determine funding allocation consistent with the methodology contained in Exhibit I, Funding Allocation Methodology. 2.4. Annual Reporting Assistance 2.4.1. WSDOT will distribute sufficient quantities of the State "Program Description & Employer Annual Report" form to the CONTRACTOR, or other eligible recipients, if requested. WSDOT will also maintain an internet-based annual report system and will provide information and ongoing technical assistance to employers and jurisdictions using the system. 2.5. Survey Assistance 2.5.1. WSDOT will: 2.5.1.1. Provide the CONTRACTOR, or its eligible contracting partner(s), with summary survey information if requested. 2.5.1.2. Distribute sufficient numbers of the Employee Questionnaires to the CONTRACTOR or its eligible contracting partner(s) if requested. 2.5.1.3. Maintain an internet-based survey tool, and provide information and ongoing technical assistance to employers and jurisdictions using the system. Page 11 of 17 GCA 5389 2.5.1.4. Provide survey processing at no cost to the CONTRACTOR, or its eligible contracting partner(s), and affected employers, during the base year and all subsequent surveys. 2.5.1.5. Provide technical assistance to the CONTRACTOR, or its eligible contracting partner(s), and employers, on surveying, if requested. 2.5.1.6. Work with the CONTRACTOR, or its eligible contracting partner(s), to calculategoal measurement information and track measurement survey history for all CTR affected worksites. 2.5.1.7. Return the processed employee commuter survey and reports to the CONTRACTOR, or its eligible contracting partner(s), within thirty (30) days of the date the forms are delivered for processing 2.5.1.8. Maintain and update the "CTR Guide for Employer Surveys." WSDOT will review survey guide/instructional materials developed by the CONTRACTOR or its eligible contracting partner(s) for consistency with the state-developed "CTR Guide for Employer Surveys," which may be obtained from WSDOT. 2.5.1.9. Review all electronically submitted survey notifications and respond to the CONTRACTOR within five (5) working days after receipt. Page 12 of 17 GCA 5 389 • Exhibit III Progress Report Organization Submitting Report: Reporting Jurisdiction: Contact Information Name: Phone: Fax: Email: Executive Summary Prepare a brief narrative summary of activities during the period for which reimbursement is requested: Required Activities Worksite notification: Survey Administration: Annual Report: • Exemption Reviews: Records Maintenance: Enforcement: Employer Service Activities Employer Training: Incentives: Promotion and Marketing: Guaranteed Ride Home: Other Activities: Arnisy Page 13 of 17 (JCA 5389 Expenditures This Period State CTR Fiscal Year To Local Funds Fiscal Year To Other Funds Fiscal Year to Funds Spent Spent on CTR Date Local Spent on CTR Date Other Categories Since Last Date State CTR Activities Since Funds Spent on Activities Since Funds Spent on Report Funds Spent Last report CTR Activities Last Report CTR Activities Required Activities: a. Notification of new worksites b.Administration of CTR surveys _ c. Employer Annual Report d.Review of Exemptions e. Record Maintenance f. Enforcement Subtotal: $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 Employer Service Activities: a.Employer Training b.Incentives c. Promotion and Marketing d.Guaranteed Ride Home e. Other(Specify in Executive Summary) Subtotal: $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 Total: $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 State CTR Funds Disbursed If your jurisdiction disbursed any state CTR funds reported above to other organizations or jurisdictions to implement the CTR program list those disbursements below. Jurisdiction/Organization Disbursed Since Last Report Total Disbursed Fiscal Year to Date Total Disbursement: $0.00 $0.00 Page 14 of 17 GCA 5 389 Jurisdiction Contact Information A complete list is required for the first quarter and only changes are required in subsequent quarters. Jurisdiction Contact Name Address ZIP Code Phone Fax Email Address Page 15 of 17 GCA 5389 Worksite Information A complete list is required with the first report. Changes and new worksite information are required in subsequent reports. Address ' Worksite Name CTR ID Address(Physical) ZIP Code Worksite Status Change? (Active,Inactive, V or N Affected,Voluntary) Page 16 of 17 GCA 5389 Employer Annual Reports List and attach a copy of all employer annual reports accepted by the jurisdiction(s)since the last report. If WSDOT's web-based reporting system was used then a copy isn't required. Format of Report CTR ID Worksite Name (Hard Copy,Electronic Copy, WSDOT Web) Employer Exemptions Granted During This Period Provide the name and Worksite ID for any worksite that has been granted a CTR exemption during the period, including information about the reason and duration of the exemption. CTR ID Purpose of Exemption Exemption Duration(Start and End Dates) • Page 17 of 17 GCA 5389 CITY OF RENTON COUNCIL AGENDA BILL /. Submitting Data: Planning/Building/Public Works For Agenda of: Dept/Div/Board.. Transportation Systems June 25, 2007 Staff Contact Nathan A. Jones, x7217 Agenda Status Consent X Subject: Public Hearing.. 2007-2008 King County Commute Trip Reduction Correspondence.. (CTR) Contract Ordinance Resolution Old Business Exhibits: New Business Issue Paper Study Sessions Resolution (forthcoming) Information Agreement Recommended Action: Approvals: Legal Dept X Council Concur Finance Dept Other Fiscal Impact: (Account Number 103.000000.016.5950.0092.43.000031) Expenditure Required $38,060 Transfer/Amendment $37,340 (King County charges) Revenue Generated. $44,355.10 + $720 (workshop expenses) (state funding) Total Project Budget $55,000 (2007 budget) City Share Total Project. SUMMARY OF ACTION: This agreement authorizes King County Department of Transportation staff to conduct work in support of activities the City of Renton is required to do under the State of Washington Commute Trip Reduction (CTR) Law. This is an ongoing program and the contract is renewed annually. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Authorize the Mayor and City Clerk to enter into an agreement with King County for implementation of the Citywide CTR Program in the amount of$38,060 and present the resolution for reading and adoption. H:\Division.s\TRANSPOR.TAT\PLANNING\Nathan Jones\CTR\contractsUtingco\2007-2008\07-08 CTR KC AGENDA BILL.doc O PLANNING/BUILDING/ ® , PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT •veP -N-c0� MEMORANDUM DATE: June 25, 2007 TO: Toni Nelson, President Members of the Renton City Council VIA: , Kathy Keolker, Mayor FROM: Gregg Zimmerman, Administrator STAFF CONTACT: Nathan A. Jones, Transportation Planning, extension 7217 SUBJECT: 2007-2008 King County Commute Trip Reduction Contract ISSUE: Should the City continue a contract with King County for Commute Trip Reduction (CTR)? `o+' RECOMMENDATION: Authorize the Mayor and City Clerk to enter into an agreement with King County for implementation of the Citywide CTR Program in the amount of$38,060 and present the resolution for reading and adoption. BACKGROUND: Each year since the state CTR law was passed in 1991, the City has entered into an agreement with the King County Department of Transportation to allow Metro Transit Division staff to perform the state-mandated duties specified by the Washington State CTR law on behalf of the City of Renton. The City operates a program in accordance with the state and local CTR law to monitor Renton employers with CTR-affected work sites for progress and compliance. This law was enacted as part of the Washington State Clean Air Act to provide measures that would improve air quality and also manage congestion by encouraging the use of alternatives to single occupancy vehicle (SOV) commute travel through the use of incentives to employees of businesses with 100 or more staff members arriving to work between 6 a.m. and 9 a.m. Toni Nelson,President Members of the Renton City Council Page 2 of 2 June 25,2007 The City contracts each year with King County Department of Transportation Metro Transit Division to provide staff to offer technical assistance to Renton businesses affected by the CTR law. King County staff assists with the notification of new sites, employee surveys, program review, records maintenance, and more. The amount of the contract between the City and King County is based on the number of work sites being monitored. Currently, there are 24 CTR-affected employer work sites in the City. King County is requesting$38,060 to cover the expenses of the above-mentioned activities from July 1, 2007 to June 30, 2008. The prior contract, for the same amount, covered the same activities at 22 CTR-affected work sites. Funding provided by the State of Washington covers the expenses of the King County contract and a portion of City staff administrative labor. The 2007 budget allocates $55,000 to cover the expenses of the King County contract and City of Renton staff time for monitoring programs, performing reviews of annual employer program reports, and attending regional trip reduction coordinating meetings, etc. cc: Jay Covington,Chief Administrative Officer Peter Hahn,Deputy PBPW Administrator—Transportation Jim Seitz,Transportation Planning and Programming Supervisor Nate Jones,Transportation Planning File Ned h:'Ndivision.s\transportat\planning.nathanjones\ctr\contractslkingco\2007-200807-08 contract issue paper to mayor.doc COMMUTE TRIP REDUCTION ACT IMPLEMENTATION AGREEMENT An Agreement between King County, through its Department of Transportation, (hereinafter called "King County ")and the City of Renton ("City"), hereinafter jointly referred to as the "Parties," for the purpose of implementing the Washington State Commute Trip Reduction Act of 1991. WHEREAS, the Washington State Legislature enacted the Commute Trip Reduction Act (Chapter 202, Laws of 1991, codified as RCW 70.94.521-551)to require local governments in those counties experiencing the greatest automobile-related air pollution and traffic congestion to develop and implement plans to reduce vehicle miles traveled per employee and single occupant vehicle commute trips; and WHEREAS,the City has within its boundaries one or more "major employers" and is required by RCW 70.94.527 to develop and implement a commute trip reduction plan; and WHEREAS,the Parties hereto are authorized to enter into this Agreement pursuant to RCW 70.94.527(6); and WHEREAS,the King County Code 28.94.110 authorizes the execution and administration of Agreements with state and local agencies for assistance in implementing the Commute Trip Reduction Act; and N„- WHEREAS,the local jurisdiction commute trip reduction plans are required to be coordinated and consistent with plans of adjacent jurisdictions and applicable regional plans; and WHEREAS,the City and King County desire to implement the Commute Trip Reduction Act consistent with the guidelines established by the state Commute Trip Reduction Task Force and with King County and other cities within the county; and WHEREAS,the City can achieve cost efficiencies and administrative consistency by contracting with King County for CTR implementation; NOW THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual promises and covenants herein, it is hereby agreed: SECTION 1.0 PURPOSE. The purpose of this Agreement is to assign certain tasks to be undertaken by King County on behalf of the City to implement the CTR Act. SECTION 2.0 DEFINITIONS. The following definitions shall apply for purposes of this Agreement: Page 2 "Administrative Representative" means the primary administrative contact for issues related to , ed this Agreement as designated in Section 3.5 of the Agreement. "Affected Employer" means an employer required by RCW 70.94.521 and the City's CTR Plan to implement a CTR program(see also "major employer"). "Commute Trip Reduction Plan (CTR Plan)" means a plan adopted by the City designed to reduce the proportion of single occupant vehicle commute trips and vehicle miles traveled per employee, as described in RCW 70.94.527. "Commute Trip Reduction Program (CTR Program)" means a program designed by an affected employer to reduce the proportion of single occupant vehicle commute trips and the commute trip vehicle miles traveled by employees at a worksite, as described in RCW 70.94.531. "CTR Funds" means state funds authorized by RCW 70.94.544 and Section 301 of the Natural Resources biennial budget to help counties and cities implement commute trip reduction plans. "Major Employer" means a private or public employer that employs one hundred or more full- time employees at a single worksite who are scheduled to begin their regular workday between 6:00 a.m. and 9:00 a.m. on weekdays for at least twelve continuous months during the year, as provided in RCW 70.94.521 (herein also known as an"affected employer"). "State" is the Washington State Department of Transportation(WSDOT) unless otherwise noted. SECTION 3.0 SCOPE OF WORK 3.1 Scope of Work: The scope of work to be completed by King County and the City in accordance with this Agreement is described in"Exhibit A: Scope of Work",which by reference is made a part of this Agreement. Funds provided by the City to King County under this Agreement shall be used solely for activities undertaken to fulfill the provisions of the scope of work as provided in Exhibit A. 3.2 Regional Cooperation: Some tasks in the Scope of Work are subarea or county-wide and assume that the City will participate with other contracting cities and try to the extent possible to develop policies and products consistent throughout the county to take advantage of economies of scale and cost efficiencies. 3.3 Schedule: The schedule for tasks is specified in Exhibit A: Scope of Work. A quarterly review of progress to date and anticipated activities will be held with jurisdiction representatives. On-going review of issues and materials will be conducted with the jurisdiction representatives. Page 3 3.4 Project Organization: The contract-funded position will conduct contractual activities for the jurisdiction. The position will work in a single division which includes other contract Nita'` staff and report to the CTR Services Supervisor. 3.5 Administrative Representatives: King County and the City shall each designate an administrative representative for matters pertaining to this Agreement. King County shall be represented by the Manager of Sales and Customer Service or his designee. The City shall be represented by the Director, Transportation System Division or his/her designee. 3.6 State Requirements: At the request of the City, King County shall provide information to the State for monitoring or evaluation activities as outlined in the Interlocal Agreement. SECTION 4.0 DISBURSEMENT OF FUNDS 4.1 Budget: The budget for work to be performed through June 30, 2008 is specified in Exhibit B. 4.2 Equipment: Equipment to be purchased under this Agreement shall be used exclusively for the purpose of CTR administration for the City and other jurisdictions in King County. King County shall own all such equipment and maintain it at no additional cost to the City. 4.3 Payment Process: King County shall submit the City's invoice and a quarterly progress report to the City per the following schedule. The City shall make payment to King County within 45 days of receipt of the invoice. Payment Fixed Invoice Submitted Payment No Earlier Than 1St payment $9,335.00 September 30, 2007 2°d payment $9,335.00 December 31, 2007 3rd payment $9,335.00 March 31, 2008 4th payment $9,335.00 June 30, 2008 Total $37,340.00 4.4 Payment Amounts: Each payment shall consist of the fixed amount specified above in Section 4.3, plus reimbursement of workshop expenses estimated to $720.00. The City shall pay a percentage share of workshop expenses based on the percentage of the total registrants for the workshop representing worksites in the City. The workshop expenses to be shared by the City shall consist of a fixed labor element plus actual non-labor expenditures. The fixed labor element shall be as follows: Page 4 - ETC Orientation $502.50 fixed labor charge per workshop - Program Implementation $502.50 fixed labor charge per workshop - Survey Briefing $175.87 fixed labor charge per workshop - Additional Workshops $50.25 fixed labor charge per hour for King County trainers SECTION 5.0 AUDITING OF RECORDS, DOCUMENTS,AND REPORTS The State Auditor and any of its representatives shall have full access to and the right to examine during normal business hours and as often as the state Auditor may deem necessary,all the records of the City and King County with respect to all matters covered in this Agreement. Each Party to the Agreement shall have similar access and rights with respect to the records of the other Party. Such representatives shall be permitted to audit, examine,and make excerpts or transcripts from such records and to make audits of all contracts, invoices,materials,payrolls,and records of matters covered by this Agreement. Such rights last for three (3)years from the date final payment is made hereunder. SECTION 6.0 EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY. King County agrees to abide by all applicable federal and state statutes and regulations prohibiting employment discrimination. SECTION 7.0 WAIVER OF DEFAULT Waiver of any default shall not be deemed to be a waiver of any subsequent default. Waiver of breach of any provision of the Agreement shall not be deemed to be a waiver of any other or subsequent breach and shall not be construed to be a modification of the terms of the Agreement unless stated to be such in writing, signed by an authorized representatives of the County, and attached to the original Agreement. SECTION 8.0 SEVERABILITY Should any clause,phrase, sentence or paragraph of this Agreement be declared invalid or void, the remaining provisions of this Agreement shall remain in full force and effect if such remainder continues to conform to the terms and requirements of applicable law and the intent of this Agreement. Page 5 SECTION 9.0 INDEMNIFICATION AND HOLD HARMLESS It is understood and agreed that this Agreement is solely for the benefit of the Parties hereto and gives no right to any other Party. No joint venture or partnership is formed as a result of this Agreement. Each Party hereto agrees to be responsible and assumes liability for its own negligent acts or omissions, and those of its officers, agents or employees,while performing work pursuant to this Agreement, to the fullest extent required by law, and agrees to save, indemnify, defend, and hold the other Parties harmless from any such liability. In the case of negligence of multiple Parties, any damages allowed shall be assessed in proportion to the percentage of negligence attributable to each Party,and each Party shall have the right to seek contribution from the other Parties in proportion to the percentage of negligence attributable to the other Parties. The City acknowledges it is solely responsible for its compliance with the CTR Act, and for the adoption, implementation, and enforcement of any ordinances,plans,and programs related to the CTR Act. The City shall indemnify and hold King County harmless from, and shall process and defend, at its own expense, any and all claims, demands, suits at law of equity, actions, penalties, losses, damages, or costs arising out of, in connection with, or incidental to any act or omission of the City or any of its officers, employees, subcontractors or agents in adopting or enforcing any ordinances,plans and programs related to the CTR Act. The Parties hereto acknowledge that the State of Washington is not liable for damage or claims from damages arising from any act or omission of King County or the City under this Agreement. fir► SECTION 10.0 AGREEMENT PERIOD This Agreement is effective from July 1, 2007. The expiration date for purposes of performing substantive work as described in Exhibit A(Scope of Work) and for incurring costs is June 30, 2008, and for final accounting purposes is July 31, 2008, unless the Parties agree to an extension. Termination of this Agreement does not relieve any of the Parties from any obligations incurred through the date of termination as a result of this Agreement. SECTION 11.0 AGREEMENT MODIFICATIONS This Agreement may be amended, altered, clarified or extended only by written Agreement of the designated administrative representative of the City and King County. SECTION 12.0 TERMINATION 12.1 Either Party to this Agreement may terminate the Agreement, in whole or in part, upon thirty(30) days advance written notice of the termination to the other Party. If this Agreement is so terminated prior to fulfillment of the terms stated herein, King County shall '441rrr Page 6 be reimbursed for all actual direct and related indirect expenses and noncancellable obligations incurred to date of termination. 12.2 If at any time during the Agreement period the State acts to terminate, reduce, modify, or withhold CTR Grant Funds allotted to the City pursuant to RCW 79.94.544 then either Party may terminate this Agreement by giving thirty(30) days' advance written notice to the other Party. Dated this day of ,2007. IN WITNESS WHEREOF,the Parties hereto have executed this Agreement as of the day first above mentioned. KING COUNTY: By Kevin Desmond General Manager Metro Transit Approved as to form: CITY OF RENTON By By City Attorney Mayor City of Renton—Exhibit A Commute Trip Reduction Services Contract Niro' Scope of Work Period: July 1, 2007, through June 30, 2008 Work Activities—24 current sites Schedule A. Notification of new sites As needed 1. Identify contact for potential sites 2. Send notification inquiry 3. Confirm status 4. Secure state code 5. Create timeline and legal file B. Survey First quarter and 1. Alert employer to survey timeline as necessary 2. Track survey completion and processing 3. Send survey results to employer C. Program review 1. Remind employers of submittal deadlines Ordinance 2. Monitor program report receipt schedule by 3. Review revised programs for sites that did not make progress and evaluate the Site Now potential for progress toward SOV reduction 4. Review program reports for completeness for new sites and for sites that made progress toward goal 5. Recommend action to jurisdiction 6. Generate approval letter for City signature D. Exemptions&Modifications As needed 1. Inform new sites about process and criteria 2. Receive requests and copy to city 3. Copy request to state for comment 4. Review and analyze request and provide comments to City 5. Contact employer as needed,generate and send response per city E. Records maintenance On-going 1. Maintain database and master file records on all affected sites 2. On a quarterly basis, provide WSDOT with hard copy of each employer program report approved within the quarter 3. Provide WSDOT with an electronic copy of the CTR database of the City's CTR-affected employers, quarterly or as required by WSDOT 4. Provide quarterly report information for jurisdiction to conduct state funds billing Exhibit A F. Program Development As needed New Sites Igoe I. Provide written information on basic requirements of the CTR Ordinance, CTR Zones, and an explanation of how the plan is intended to achieve its goals 2. Provide materials that explain a range of measures and activities that may help the employer achieve the CTR goals of the local ordinance 3. Assist with voluntary baseline survey. Analyze survey data and make programs recommendations. G. New ETC Consultation/Briefing As needed 1. Provide written information on basic requirements of the CTR Ordinance, CTR Zones,and an explanation of how the plan is intended to achieve its goals 2. Provide materials that explain a range of measures and activities that may help the employer achieve the CTR goals of the local ordinance H. Program Implementation Assistance As needed Provide assistance in the following categories: 1. Identify resources and implementation requirements 2. Coordinate/attend network group meetings 3. Communicate with ETCs about transportation issues, including Sound Transit, Metro Transit, Special events and items of interest(e.g.: construction and road closures,Air Quality alerts, WSRO bulletins) 4. Provide promotion/incentive support and coordination(e.g.: planning, develop materials, implement and evaluate, includes Rideshare campaign and Wheel Options campaign) Training Quarterly Provide county-wide basic training to new ETCs 1. Basic Training part 1: ETC orientation 2. Basic Training part 2: Program Implementation and Promotion 3. Survey briefing 2 CITY OF RENTON Exhibit B Period: July 1, 2007 through June 30, 2008 FUNDING State CTR Funds TOTAL FUNDS AVAILABLE $ 44,355.08 NUMBER OF SITES 24 CTR SERVICES CONTRACT Required Activities 1. New Site Notification/ Site status change $ 151 2. Data Management& Survey Processes $ 5,085 3. Program Review& Site Analysis $ 12,713 4. Exemptions, Modifications and Compliance Issues $ 1,206 5. Records Maintenance $ 3,317 Total Required Activities $ 22,472 Employer Service 1. Employer Training $ 720 2. Incentives $ 1,100 3. Promotions & Marketing $ 2,211 4. Program Development $ 1,608 5. Program Implementation $ 9,950 Total Employer Service $ 15,589 CONTRACT TOTAL $ 38,060 1,4 CITY OF RENTON COUNCIL AGENDA BILL AI #: • Submitting Data: For Agenda of: Dept/Div/Board.. Planning/Building/Public Works June 25, 2007 Utility Systems Division Staff Contact Robert Mac Onie, Jr. Agenda Status (x 7369) Consent X Subject: Public Hearing.. Correspondence.. Professional Land Surveying Services Roster Ordinance Resolution Old Business Exhibits: New Business Attachment A: Surveying Services Roster 2007 Study Sessions Information Recommended Action: Approvals: Council Concur Legal Dept X Finance Dept Other Li Fiscal Impact: -0- Expenditure Required... -0- Transfer/Amendment Amount Budgeted -0- Revenue Generated Total Project Budget -0- City Share Total Project.. SUMMARY OF ACTION: The Technical Services Section of the Planning/Building/Public Works Department no longer has a survey crew and has insufficient staff to meet the department's needs for surveying services. Staff advertised for Statements of Qualifications (SOQs) for an Annual Consultant Roster to provide surveying services. We received SOQs from 17 firms. Staff evaluated the SOQs and selected 11 firms for placement on the roster. The roster will be valid for the period from July 2007 to July 2008, with the opportunity to extend the roster annually, for another two years. As the City requires these services, a standard City surveying services contract will be executed with the most qualified consultant on the list. Contracts will be negotiated and executed in compliance with City Policy 250-02, Bidding and Contracting Requirements, and subsequent amendments to this policy, as approved by the Mayor and City Council. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Authorize inclusion of the list of consultants on Attachment A on the Annual Consultant Roster— Surveying Services, to be used from July 2007 to July 2008. H:\File Sys\TSA-Technical Services Section Administration\TSA-11 -Consultant Contracts\TSA-11-0018-Surveyor Roster Selection Process\2007 Survey Roster AGENDA BILL.doc\RTMtp Attachment A: Surveying Services Roster 2007 APS Surveying&Mapping fru' Tyler Sweet Voice:(425)746-3200 13221 SE 26th Street, Suite A FAX:(425)746-3342 Bellevue,WA 98005 Bush,Roed&Hitchings Steven Hitchings Voice:(206)323-4144 2009 Minor Avenue East FAX:(206)323-7135 Seattle,WA 98102-3513 CH2M Hill Chris Royak Voice:(425)453-5000 1100 112th Avenue NE FAX:(425)468-3100 Bellevue,WA 98009-2050 Duane Hartman and Associates Duane Hartman Voice:(425)483-5355 16928 Wooinville-Redmond Road,B-107 FAX:(425)483-4650 Woodinville,WA 98072 INCA Bob Custer Voice:(425)635-1000 400 112th Avenue NE,Suite 400 FAX:(425)635-1150 Bellevue,WA 98004 PACE Donald Fordney Voice:(425)827-2014 NamY 11255 Kirkland Way, Suite 300 FAX:(425)827-5043 Kirkland,WA 98033 Pacific Geomatic Services Kerrel Bell Voice:(425)778-5620 6608 216th St.SW, Suite 304 FAX:(425)775-2849 Mountlake Terrace,WA 98043 Perteet Mike Yeoman Voice:(425)252-7700 2707 Colby Avenue,Suite 900 FAX:(425)339-6018 Everett,WA 98201 Peterson Consulting Engineers Michael Mickiewicz Voice:(425)827-5874 4010 Lake Washington Blvd NE, Suite 300 FAX:(425)822-7216 Kirkland,WA 98033 Triad Associates Bradley Freeman Voice:(425)821-8448 12112 115th Avenue NE FAX:(425)821-3481 Kirkland,WA 98034-6929 W&H Pacific Voice:(425)951-4800 Jon Warren 3350 Monte Villa Parkway FAX:(425)951-4808 Bothell,WA 98021 Nape Thursday,June 14,2007 Page 1 of 1 H.•FileSys:TSA-11-Consultant Roster-So()',alb a vised 6.125---0100,_7 CITY OF RENTON COUNCIL AGENDA BII 4 AI#: • to Submitting Data: Planning/Building/Public Works For Agenda of: Dept/Div/Board.. Transportation Systems Division June 25, 2007 Staff Contact Derek Akesson, Ext. 7243 Agenda Status Consent X Subject: Public Hearing Temporary Street Closures for Rainier, Shattuck and Correspondence Hardie Avenues at the BNSF Railroad Bridge Crossings Ordinance for BNSF Bridge Replacement Project Resolution X Old Business Exhibits: New Business X Issue Paper Study Sessions Resolution (forthcoming) Information Recommended Action: Approvals: Council Concur Legal Dept X Finance Dept Fiscal Impact: Expenditure Required Transfer/Amendment Amount Budgeted Revenue Generated Amount Needed City Share Total Project.... SUMMARY OF ACTION: The BNSF Railway Company is replacing railroad bridges over Rainier, Shattuck, and Hardie avenues in 2007. Construction is scheduled to begin on August 1, 2007, and end on December 28, 2007. To expedite the street closure process and ensure BNSF can meet the construction schedule,the Transportation Division is requesting a full temporary closure of Rainier Avenue South, Shattuck Avenue South, and Hardie Avenue South at the BNSF Railroad bridge crossings. Street Closure dates: Shattuck Avenue South: From August 1, 2007,to August 10, 2007; from August 16, 2007,to December 28, 2007. Rainier Avenue South: From 5:00 a.m. August 11, 2007, to 10:00 p.m. August 15, 2007. Hardie Avenue SW: From August 16, 2007,to August 20, 2007. Working hours will be extended to 7:00 a.m. to 10:00 p.m. over the weekend of August 11 and 12 pursuant to RMC 4-4-030C. Shattuck Avenue South and Hardie Avenue SW are to remain open during closures on Rainier Avenue South in order to serve as detour routes for Rainier Avenue closures. BNSF requires one day to remove the existing superstructure and one day to place the new superstructure over Rainier Avenue and Hardie Avenue. At this time,these dates are unknown. BNSF will inform the City of these closure dates two weeks in advance. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Authorize the temporary closure of Rainier Avenue South, Shattuck Avenue South, and Hardie Avenue SW at the BNSF bridge crossings to construct the bridge replacements and present the resolution for reading and adoption authorizing the temporary closures. H:\Division.s\TRANSPOR.TAT\ADMIN\Agenda 2007\Temporary Street Closures(rev).doc ti` Y O� PLANNING/BUILDING/i% PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT ' O� MEMORANDUM DATE: June 25, 2007 TO: Toni Nelson, President Members of the Renton City Council VIA: fv Kathy Keolker, Mayor FROM: Gregg ZimmermY, inistrator STAFF CONTACT: Derek Akesson, Transportation Design Project Manager(x7243) SUBJECT: Temporary Street Closures for Rainier, Shattuck and Hardie Avenues at the BNSF Railroad Bridge Crossings for the BNSF Bridge Replacement Project ISSUE: Should the Council authorize the temporary street closures for the Rainier Avenue South, Shattuck Avenue South, and Hardie Avenue SW at the BNSF railroad bridges for the BNSF bridge replacement project? RECOMMENDATION: Authorize the temporary closure of Rainier Avenue South, Shattuck Avenue South, and Hardie Avenue SW at the BNSF bridge crossings to construct the bridge replacements and present the resolution for reading and adoption authorizing the temporary closures. BACKGROUND: The BNSF Railway Company is replacing railroad bridges over Rainier, Shattuck, and Hardie Avenues in 2007. Construction is scheduled to begin on August 1, 2007, and end on December 28, 2007. The benefits to the City having BNSF replace these railroad bridges are: (1)the ability to construct future street improvements without impacting railroad bridges or rail service; (2) a compressed construction schedule which will minimize street closures,traffic disruption and construction noise in the area; and (3)a reduction of more than 50 percent in railroad bridge replacement costs. To expedite the street closure process and ensure BNSF can meet the construction schedule,the Transportation Division is requesting a full temporary closure of Rainier Avenue South, Shattuck Avenue South, and Hardie Avenue South at the BNSF Railroad bridge crossings. • Toni Nelson, President Members of the Renton City Council Page 2 of 2 June 25,2007 Street Closure dates: Shattuck Avenue South: From August 1, 2007, to August 10, 2007; from August 16, 2007,to December 28, 2007. Rainier Avenue South: From 5:00 a.m. August 11, 2007, to 10:00 p.m. August 15, 2007. Hardie Avenue SW: From August 16, 2007,to August 20, 2007. Working hours will be extended to 7:00 a.m.to 10:00 p.m. over the weekend of August 11 and 12 pursuant to RMC 4-4-030C. Shattuck Avenue South and Hardie Avenue SW are to remain open during closures on Rainier Avenue South in order to serve as detour routes for Rainier Avenue closures. BNSF requires one day to remove the existing superstructure and one day to place the new superstructure over Rainier Avenue South and Hardie Avenue SW. At this time,these dates are unknown. BNSF will inform the City of these closure dates two weeks in advance. cc: Peter Hahn,Deputy PBPW Administrator—Transportation Bob Hanson,Transportation Design Supervisor Derek Akesson,Transportation Design Project Manager File HADivision.s\TRANSPOR.TAT\ADMIN\Agenda 2007\BNSF Bridge Temporary Closure Issue Paper.doc 0 , °' BNSF Railroad Company *�� oBridge Replacement Project t 1v,� Site Map "` tr' �_ ,'� . a .. ..,� r lo , � '� .a,N.` s d f' y,:. ,- x t "-,,,, '. .„,,,,,,, ,-,. ,. ..,,Lk,k.,,,.,.:,,.,.-, '"'-'1- '- '., 999 2 P \ , t. • ,'ti ,in a 3 u. u �,a� ��`'w1, r , � i? � " 7' 'r z;' ,.. akfz `� s ��, +*�' ®a •i.-,#. " �"� � � tau° ` . ' 4":��* ', ' ,„. 1Street Closure Locations i S ` t, , '` �r, RAINIER AVENUE STREET CLOSURE AT RAILROAD BRIDGE SCHEDULED TO BEGIN FRIDAY, AUGUST 10, 7:00 PM AND END MONDAY, AUGUST 13, 5:00 AM C. Y BNSF Railroad Company ` e .f+ Bridge Replacement Project 4, NT/ Rainier Avenue Detour Plan 111 , yfi' , ,,, i N I --S3RDPL z*1 „to / NI r= , ' i.: /} ki S f ya j , , W. ill ti. A. @ A 4 cai \',\,,, d, 5. AlliA PIL- 4 1 .11 f \Z,,\"''''''''''''' '''' ' ' '' '' .g ' 1 �r, LEGEND . �'i .....) L' ( . ..., ' -5 7TH ST T CLOSED ROAD I :I LOCAL ACCESS ROUTE 1 DETOUR ROUTE RAINIER AVENUE STREET CLOSURE AT RAILROAD BRIDGE SCHEDULED TO BEGIN FRIDAY, AUGUST 10, 7:00 PM AND END MONDAY, AUGUST 13, 5:00 AM CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON AUTHORIZING THE TEMPORARY STREET CLOSURES OF SHATTUCK AVENUE SOUTH, RAINIER AVENUE SOUTH AND HARDIE AVENUE SOUTHWEST. WHEREAS, Burlington Northern Santa Fe (BNSF) Railway Company is replacing railroad bridges over Rainier Avenue South, Shattuck Avenue South and Hardie Avenie Southwest, and WHEREAS, construction is scheduled to begin August 1, 2007, and end on December 28, 2007, and WHEREAS, the street closures must be scheduled so that when Rainier Avenue South is closed, both Shattuck Avenue South and Hardie Avenue Southwest will be open for detours, and WHEREAS, the proposed closures will pennit a compressed construction schedule which will minimize street closures, traffic disruption and construction noise in the area; NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON, DOES RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS: SECTION I. The above findings true and correct in all respects. SECTION II. The : •: - : • - do hereby authorize street closures as follows: Shattuck Avenue South will be closed from August 1, 2007, through August 10, 2007, and from August 16, 2007, to December 28, 2007; l Rainier Avenue will be closed from 5 a.m. August' 2007, to August 15, 2007 at 10 p.m. 1 RESOLUTION NO. Hardie Avenue SW will be closed from August 16, 2007, through August 20, 2007. PASSED BY THE CITY COUNCIL this day of , 2007. Bonnie I. Walton, City Clerk APPROVED BY THE MAYOR this day of , 2007. Kathy Keolker, Mayor Approved as to form: Lawrence J. Warren, City Attorney RES:1278:06/25/07:ch 2 CITY OF RENTON COUNCIL AGENDA BILL AI#: o o Submitting Data: For Agenda of: Dept/Div/Board.. Economic Development, June 25, 2007 Neighborhoods, and Strategic Planning Staff Contact Don Erickson, x-6581 Agenda Status Consent X Subject: Public Hearing.. PROPOSED ANNEXATION Correspondence.. Liberty - 10% Notice of Intention Petition Ordinance Annexation Petition Certification Resolution Old Business Exhibits: New Business Issue Paper Study Sessions Annexation Petition Certification Information 10% Notice of Intent Petition Recommended Action: Approvals: Council concur to set a Public Meeting date for July 9, Legal Dept X 2007 Finance Dept Other kiliwiFiscal Impact: Expenditure Required... Transfer/Amendment Amount Budgeted Revenue Generated Total Project Budget N/A City Share Total Project.. SUMMARY OF ACTION: The petitioners submitted their 10% Notice of Intent to Commence Annexation Proceedings petition to the City Clerk on May 10, 2007. The signatures on the petition were certified by the King County Department of Assessments on May 30, 2007. The proposed 184.2-acre annexation site is located within the City's East Renton Plateau Potential Annexation Area in what was previously part of the 1,475-acre Preserve Our Plateau Annexation area. It is located west of Liberty High School and generally east of 156th Avenue SE and north of SE 144th Street. State law requires the Council to hold a public meeting with the proponents to consider their request, within 60-days of their submittal date. At this meeting the Council can accept, modify, or reject the petition and its proposed boundaries. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Council set July 9, 2007, for a public meeting to consider whether to accept or reject the 10% Notice of Intention to Commence Annexation Proceedings petition for the proposed Liberty Le Annexation. EDNSP/PAA/Annexations/Liberty Annexation/agnbill/de (cY 0 iorme C.) „ � CITY OF RENTON ,� ♦ ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT, NEIGHBORHOODS AND re STRATEGIC PLANNING MEMORANDUM DATE: June 18, 2007 TO: Toni Nelson, Council President City Councilmembers VIA: , Mayor Kathy Keolker 5;0- FROM: Alex Pietsch, Administrator Economic Development, Neighborhoods and Strategic Planning Department STAFF CONTACT: Don Erickson (6581) Now SUBJECT: Proposed Liberty Annexation 10% Notice of Intent ISSUE: The City is in receipt of a Notice of Intent petition to commence annexation proceedings for approximately 184.2-acres using the direct petition method (Figure 1). State law requires that the Council hold a public meeting with annexation proponents within 60-days of receipt of a 10% Notice of Intent petition, to decide whether to accept, reject, or geographically modify the proposal, whether to require the assumption of bonded indebtedness, and whether to require the simultaneous adoption of city zoning if the proposed annexation is successful. RECOMMENDATION: On the basis of the following analysis, the Administration recommends that Council accept the 10% Notice of Intent to Commence Annexation Proceedings petition. If Council concurs, the Administration recommends that it take the following actions (pursuant to RCW 35A.14.120): • Accept the 10% Notice of Intent to Commence Annexation Proceedings petition • Authorize the circulation of the 60% Direct Petition to Annex for the 184.2-acre area • Require that property owners within the proposed annexation area assume a proportional share of the City's outstanding voted indebtedness and accept zoning consistent with the Comprehensive Plan. Proposed Liberty Annexation 10% Notice of Intent June 18, 2007 Page 2 BACKGROUND SUMMARY: The irregularly shaped proposed Liberty Annexation site is located near the center of what was the previously proposed 1,475-acre Preserve Our Plateau Annexation area that failed at election. The current annexation is based on the use of covenants to annex that were entered into by property owners in exchange for Renton sewer over the last few years. As a result of four new subdivisions that have covenants to annex, approximately 62% of the area's assessed valuation is already assured. 1. Location: The proposed 184.2-acre, Liberty Annexation is primarily located east of 156th Avenue SE and south of SE 136th Street. A small portion, approximately 13.82 acres lies west of 156th Avenue SE and approximately 24.84 acres lies north of SE 136th Street and east of 156th Avenue SE. The annexation site abuts Liberty High School along its eastern border and generally lies north of SE 144th Street to the south. 2. Assessed value: The 2006 assessed valuation for the subject annexation site, at current development, is approximately$83,576,100. 3. Natural features: Much of the site is characterized by steep slopes, particularly in its southwest and southern portions (Figure 2, Topography). 4. Existing land uses: Existing development includes approximately 235 single-family dwellings and a number of vacant lots in new subdivisions under development. New subdivisions include Hamilton Place, Nichols Place, Evendell, and Liberty Grove (Figure 3, Existing Structures). 5. Comprehensive Plan: Renton's Comprehensive Plan designates the subject annexation site as Residential Low Density(RLD). 6. Existing zoning: King County zoning is R-4. This zoning allows a base density of four units per gross acre, and up to 6 units per gross acre with incentives and/or transfer of density credits. The City prezoned the East Renton Plateau including the Liberty Annexation area in November 2006. The subject site was prezoned R-4, four units per net acre. Upon annexation, R-4 zoning would take effect on the non-street portions of the 184.2-acre area. 7. Public services: All responding departments and divisions noted that the annexation represents a logical extension of their respective services and systems. Specific comments follow. Water Utility. The subject proposed annexation is within King County Water District No. 90's water service area. Because of how this area developed, it lacks a standard 8- inch water line and, instead, is served by undersized 4-inch and 6-inch water mains that cannot provide the minimum required fire flow demand of 1,000 gallons per minute. Although new development will provide higher capacity lines, utility staff notes that the existing older lines will eventually need to be replaced with an 8-inch water line with Nimoi new fire hydrants to adequately serve existing development. Water District No. 90 will need to acquire a franchise to operate its water facilities with the City limits and Renton's rights-of-way. Proposed Liberty Annexation 10% Notice of Intent June 18, 2007 Page 3 'err►' Sewers. Renton is the designated sewer service provider for this area and has issued sewer availability certificates for all the new subdivisions being built in the area. Sewer exists in the City of Renton to the west and will eventually be extended out to Liberty High School. Because the annexation site is located within Renton's Sewer Service Area, future sewers will be extended by developer extension. Parks. Apparently there is a shortfall of developed neighborhood and community parks in this area. King County, however, owns 19.25 acres of undeveloped parkland adjacent to the site immediately south of Liberty High School. It also owns approximately 40- acres of undeveloped parkland beginning a block west of the annexation site along the south side of SE 136th Street. The City had been in negotiations with the County to take over these parklands had the 1,475-acre Preserve Our Plateau Annexation been successful. The projected cost of developing these underdeveloped parklands to a prorated level consistent with the service levels identified in the City's Comprehensive Park, Recreation, and Open Space Plan, is an estimated $230,262. This assumes these parklands will be transferred to the City without cost. With most of the newer development having occurred in King County under its permitting system, it is unlikely that Renton parks mitigation fees have or can be collected to offset these costs. Subdivisions approved in the County typically provide smaller tot lot type open spaces for residents of the subdivision in lieu of parks improvement fees. Fire. Fire District No. 25 currently serves the area. Renton currently provides fire Nome suppression services to the District under contract. Upon annexation, the City would continue to provide fire prevention and suppression services for the 7.6-acre area, but do so as a basic City service rather than under contract with District No. 25. Police. With an estimated existing population of approximately 485 people for this annexation, the Police Department states that there will be a need for .2 police officers to serve this annexation. Police estimate that the area will eventually generate the equivalent of one annual call for service for each of the estimated 485 residents living there. Surface Water. The 184.2-acre annexation site is located in the Orting Hills sub-basin of the Cedar River Basin. Because of the sensitivity of downstream areas, if the site was to redevelop, utilities staff recommend the use of the 2005 King County Surface Water Design Manual, Level 2 water quality treatment standards. Annual surface water operation and maintenance costs for this 184.2-acre area are estimated to be approximately$28,806 per year. Transportation. Staff notes that many of the existing streets within the proposed annexation area have narrow roadways that do not meet current City standards. As a consequence there is insufficient space to locate, curbs, gutters, and sidewalks in these existing substandard rights-of-way. New subdivisions, however, are developing with rolled curbs, sidewalks, and street lighting. Proposed transportation infrastructure to improve neighborhood circulation includes traffic signals at 156th Ave SE and 142°d 'o✓ Place SE and 156th Ave SE and SE 136th Street. ANALYSIS OF THE PROPOSED ANNEXATION: Proposed Liberty Annexation 10% Notice of Intent June 18, 2007 Page 4 1. Consistency with the Comprehensive Plan: Renton's Comprehensive Plan annexation policies generally support this proposed annexation. The subject site is within the City's Potential Annexation Area and has been subject to development pressure under the King County Comprehensive Plan, zoning, and subdivision regulations (Policies LU-36 and LU-37). The area would also be available for urbanization under Renton's Residential Low Density(RLD) land use designation. Renton is the logical provider of urban infrastructure and services to the area (Policy LU-38). Also, the proposed annexation does not divide existing established neighborhoods, but rather ensures their inclusion(Policy LU-43.4). 2. Consistency with the Boundary Review Board Objectives: (from RCW 36.93.180) a. Preservation of natural neighborhoods and communities; The proposed annexation would cause no disruption to the larger community. As noted above, the annexation site includes a number of new subdivisions that have just developed or are being developed under the County's development standards. These are subdivisions that were issued sewer availability certificates so that they could hook up to Renton's sewer utility service. b. Use of physical boundaries, including but not limited to bodies of water, highways, and land contours; Boundaries for this annexation are considered to be interim as adjacent areas are likely to annex in the future in order to obtain urban services from the City. c. Creation and preservation of logical service areas; Water and sewer service boundaries will not change. Neither will school district boundaries. As noted above, upon annexation, Renton will take over police, fire, storm water, road maintenance, and wastewater service for this area, as well as provide a whole array of local governmental services including parks and recreation, land use planning and permitting, transportation planning, code enforcement, and general governmental services not listed above. Pursuant to state law, there will be no change in the garbage service provider for at least seven years. With reduced County funding for these unincorporated urban areas, the County can no longer efficiently serve them. As an extension of its existing service districts, the City is in a much better position to serve these areas. d. Prevention of abnormally irregular boundaries; The new city boundary resulting from this annexation is admittedly somewhat irregular. However, as noted above, it is considered to be interim as additional annexations are anticipated in the future that will result in more regular boundaries. e. Discouragement of multiple incorporations of small cities and encouragement of incorporations of cities in excess of ten thousand population in heavily populated urban areas; Proposed Liberty Annexation 10% Notice of Intent June 18, 2007 Page 5 Not applicable. No incorporations are proposed in this area. f Dissolution of inactive special purpose districts; Not applicable. There are no inactive special purpose districts here. g. Adjustment of impractical boundaries; This annexation is not being proposed to adjust what are considered impractical boundaries. Further annexations in this portion of Renton's PAA are anticipated in the near future. h. Incorporation as cities or towns or annexation to cities or towns of unincorporated areas which are urban in character; King County has designated this area for urban development because of its location within the Urban Growth Boundary. The County has also indicated that it wants to divest itself from providing urban services to these unincorporated urban areas by turning them over to cities. Because the subject site is within Renton's PAA annexation is appropriate. i. Protection of agricultural and rural lands which are designated for long term productive agricultural and resource use by a comprehensive plan adopted by the county legislative authority. Not applicable. 4410., 3. A fiscal analysis for the proposed annexation is attached. This analysis indicates that the proposed annexation would initially provide a modest surplus to the City of approximately$33,261 a year, if one does not count the initially cost of eventually bringing this area up to the City's Citywide Parks and Open Space standard. With future development this surplus is expected to increase to $53,930. This is an estimated one- time pro-rated cost of$230,262 for parks acquisition and development for up to 616 City residents. CONCLUSION: The proposed Liberty Annexation is essentially consistent with all relevant City annexation policies as well as Boundary Review Board objectives for annexation. Reviewing staffs have identified no major impediments to the provision of City services to the area or indicated that they feel this annexation is untimely. Attachments 'fir„ ��.�■■.� �c�Ic11H1■11L■ii�IIEIi awn ■i�'��: ��i11�N1� ■�■■ 1 8th St � 11112 I 111 �� ■� ■ �i lnlin�V . fpn _ �.i41 t =111111 .1 r 1111 M�I1�■�1�1111■ �I � � mordi -s MINN piii ..., 4' dIM mom gin 2 mu =in 1 a mil 1 StI �11�1� • ` In, li 1 MINEMENNIE I NI i Bow C.G� m mg, 1110111p1 INN EMI laiiu�lr G11 ■� . SE 13.ndi •t ■ o■�■Ng mgm 1£ ■ nfra -- 1 ..., _ a Nin Laii .. -- • -1..man II MI 40 i� > �cnn 111111111 MIN 1119111 11 .1, .., ABIM allimMINi 1� Elem E I 1.1 — PPI o, o ` SE 1_ 34th Wit. ausi34th St il Emu SE 2jjHeights '/1i1e �► In■1 s a ■j""` - ■ 1111111111 'ii1ca1!r1:1 M '.t. ■ lip w MU > �;♦ Park Park Park �tu1■:: Main � °■ rim� b'u ■ 1111111111111 �- � 111� p�'� 1111; IV PA ■1 ■I= '- ■ IIS : 111■/ COMM■11: pi: 11,111'9\* -- ■ � ■ 1■11 /fes■ • ■■i- Park ,�� ■ -- E"Lliltnil7no tgaimun MI Num ,�ie___ Liberty , \\ 121119t anILIqJJ.IU l It ii.�ri.NJ�T� NMI MN H.S. rpm% ��mi iii N ra i �i■I ■1■ mil `�►dimom a i/�■■ W ■■■ IliPark - -- - iNs,! 1n ...■■1r►� . .. .r.. N a — — II n■m■■. � ::Iain . jjji Lim — • • bIP, llnd Ill lfldLi. 1 iI� a—nglivali—IlL 144th N II ■■1 yummete 1■■■ 11 ■ m% t acie 111 4pit! ��I■/■■■■ �. N m ileFT �I 0 Im sin 41 N imayini a i ma iso NI �n wants.wi, mill-A rr . Maywood A11k� a L/f1�1Q' i - mooouldis so b I M.S. r El se I .... 11,... ' , Q�5 �4E 14;t �� `t1.l4ith aim . _„a_ — v■..�_ .V—_______ - Liberty Annexation 0 1000 2000 Vicinity Proposed Annexation Area Eur tiTY o, Economic Development,Neighborhoods&Strategic Planning �.�'ity Limits r�000 •t), Alex Administrator �( )an Growth Boundary G .......-0 1: 111 �11L�iY1tZ`l'!• t� �� .. m�r.�7 ma, � N 1, !� is NLmm � ■IIU■ .. . S 1 8th St _ ?4III!l11irr1im; 1111182r 1NI■ 11111 1111 1 MIllllt I 11111111� �Ir Q ■111■I� num : .'..1 ■ll-:1 anon ' ilar211111111B 11 ■■Ills num :■ mom =■!a im ,°. J% - ■ri1■ "fin ■iIllll , ■■1► 1� illi c ,ynn,. d st r _mop - N on • .. 6 111111 1111 \fE11St e• MI i. et� :�-um 1111111 �■� �� 11 : � c r■111 _ "lb .11 ■d ��>s ■ �■■ _ : :;_ .n�N�1 � . 1N ""-/ r1A 1■ ■ �r• ■!!!!N N� ■■ 11111111111" ■Bnarwoo. PI��1C� r= 1r. ■ ■I/N11N _ ■.m.■■■n .�im 111 1 SE 134thQ• goo I Ufl0: di' Elam I ntl1 _ 111 • _, �• � 1aplewo�t 91111111-11� .• �I1 •� L�■■ 111111 ii / 34 f//II�E� u11u1•• mom ItiIF7 o IL: r --1 1!■_�SE 2nd PI Heights IIIIIIINI n1u111 tttl — —_ �— �[aucrin►,p!rr■ - MI t. 11N 1N1 N■'■■ —�: = 1411111•• 11111111111= 111111111111M1.121.4 �r1Np�p �', N __L _ �E 136tH St ♦ Park Park \Imp Park If 11_____ u7i I11i1111 "' - `LL 11 a 1 ' 111{; NEIN LI • mid I 1111111■ ■��■Ilf �� mune. ��a: - �■ Park �. IIIM ,...11. 111 MEI -----tet rilw • NUM" r� n r 11�']lll�■IN �11Nuu1:�1 Liberty > --S ---� Nt1�-r MI Q Q • �n1f•�. H.S. L�IEfJi1■t =o N�� ■��/� ��BNS■■�� rn r1�rr,� .1i �� M.1, 1n /2 ono ■7 . Mil N11[1NNN lilt --rte iiri ' ■ mi. �� .c� ��► •y • •..ymenu , 10.-.,.hf SII m© :a a' N►. irl Me Meow ■i arm r a� NN1N , Nu 1• m mR, !l111Men ■■ M ■��■■ Park ■■■ _— - EDCII��F"�.w .�. ��IN \J ■o !■!!!!lli�i� in N lat ■� iG�IL'� III — .r, M Immukai IIIIM al.kga wer: ercer, imm min m wpm g IN gun iiii,iimat. MI" MUMMUM .■r•il ■!� ■01141 1 ,I 1■1 -`+14 ■■ra. .,� .rte �C �� ■ ■ !L� !„ ,■ a .en �� tir.i `�� illi■■■■■1\� un- �. --- u� 111t11, .oN! II E li 0, gip wow nu WW1 Ingnilll rep...469•►�� Noma A!!■■\ ■ 11N111111■ ■t! t1YIrr *I� �� - IA, j `41. .� =011—rem pm i iriamitieb,,Aii.• To. �mul■ M■■ .I MEM ME NM Rim T 11170■n ._ 1�'��i �I Mg �' .a Ell ■ illi MEoil MImmo .1.1 al . Ma ood le,`---,... '411111111100, - Ill im, LIM i il tO E1�L� ■1■ ■� NEN . M.S. [I III Ma 11., IX z,/, , ma V• ion 4 E 1-148t INITIFS in fti 4ilik ma L i b e rty Annexation Erosion Wetlands 0 1000 2000 S, Sensitive Areas River Proposed Annexation Area c,, o,,., Economic Development,Neighborhoods&Strategic Planning City Limits Urban Growth Boundary ♦(srie). Alcx Pietsch,Administrator 1 • 1 '•1000 ,P-•�`Z CE.Feasel 1 1 L, �`T,1-O 13 June 2007 t7�'/��'�lll(1116r) �il�•,^�l 'Yrr� nye". .- •. ,a�c1w �� .*.1q \\1'....�...�.c I 7y� nn..r. i r� € rb - �,.�� 1,,.' t- :'1 ��,�i 11l 'i';) �� ..� wl �•<,�.,a\�1� itcj Lid, � , r 1 •.�..r r.- l�i�g• yj !?J � 1»�e ��u�:.11`1 .l A i`' �1'! �► 1j1i 1O,' tO �. �1;1►�,a "1 �,.�,- :,�: �, t^r•.� .N'T �, ��. ��h.r,r�i�ntr r�tc� a �►�,Nri ,r. ' -` ` � moi+ \ w: ` u, !'N(�G'v-5at.EUG� � ' , . ff•t,._-...1"....10m C'.1�Z G�`Ji. �. c ? $ `4i,.�_.Et`. ' �)kMCt_o �� wi� vi S.l'i1Ri e3�9 :.�o F�� g atcs%vog � ti .� ;, ,_ `` -4> a fifi{a�Y 'ln timi-V. t-' f . o "' 7. 'i re11 10 1 1 i fir!, P. 1.5 L\., �@� ` z t.. ,,,,--1 ,_ t% `". ([-1t 1[ 3 R :.., �. ��ja�$\ 11AlR��ri. g� � ] � � � `1�� S o \ r 1 ) 2� t ��'�#tI, r ? ,� +�fi�� l t� S _' - �) Val ' �' e tj l „, 1 •k fans-' , ,- } k d i I t O E , v �\,''\ t � � tC. T �. � � �i l� � t �, ,m , ,.,, ICik�F4",J -N`1 '.r C. ��_ � �; .! � r' gilt� ° ��, >t`,t � '''''''s:"(AR € � \,'"‘-., r!`}J'r` f �y i r .i w1r.�! i'�j, i. III ` - "i F ;J ,. i' 1 1. .�jlt. j' ,'-l;if :�, {y�.t--, t,, �S`[�a" !l1l \1 ,'t R`1' :�,• , -I ig {i J. rEa�l1 - 'moi �1 ` it i11 Me.'iorljlifi'-'-'4' t� a t!-,,� } 1S•/,1 ,---1,..-- 2-4:„., - .i tJ`Yj \ _i'I �t� $ t a Y1 \ / ail �M r ,,, '.r - 4-. 1 .,,r 'f' 2 :h —'L` 'I` �rAli � k , )`'''01 .2 t1 ` 1 _ \\ `,i Ifii . _��,,� �„ �y I�n�,� � ry41 ialikra � 1�Vas .;,,3,� �. "`' ,{!� ti��_"''�l"L } ,lz _ � -��1:(:rY5�2""'k$�RC els � �_�. irk` ^`��\��1';i��,l. 1`'�} ��\ Via, go .. 4 ,r.,., • _.. - An V '1 ,--fax r, • a F£ •'1;:;.,,717.,-.,12 ;.3 deb i ►?': �� t, \�� t'\ 1� y\ �;,•) } • � i. -,-..-T3 .,....:_„--,.-,‘--,p'16 ' 74: lgre 1t . <71•-�/f k+*�i t 4-,.-.,,,, t�6 "1 �� 1i l �' \ \ '•\f 4J *�- n3 asaaar 1 w ,� i a. n \C % % ='romait ��({. ~—, t •'i" ' „$.„,,,,w,-.4-40,-,..1 ^.,{_ L,-,,41)^� � ) r .2 :��. ...1.1. •o. ki �f1 A S - V.:- 1 i. IBJ w '�'�+ '>rd (r $ '. (e+�4 Rei '") y� .. i^,1_ a � .,�t �.if►IYL 1•'`d �..^� rif eliriewrotmek.T: Y .�"• ,�{i7: -- - � `;�ali 11'1,., s, '.1 i�4 LF mac'i"-.c: v' -- .` ' - ��r'a ,.'�,r& ) • ,' '--,qr^ • il �� '. 1-'"-P-.., hts tti r,ivq-',1'7 � d b i { Vfit A \�1, t,...,- '�s�1 _ r ,w. , 4' v 0 `� ' `► ie �l'i ('. g Ra 1 l' -04.,i 1` € • • r '�{,. t� a � _ 5`��. "'l a_ yII ,� ,�y �j� 1, Q - `Sk7� ...--._.._+�... Y�� ]n: X c, l + -1,,,,N,--,--,-lyfi 1 -L `� .)' _y,:,, 1 n o fes+ ' `._ 3ht t ly 11'�i Vn}}. .��. t � �•'1..,t, ra �. ��.j�,P� S�(x� _ jsk,l 1 L � rii -�' �. 2` ,�k s,�3€�`T� ,k .s$��r ..�� ....�;�, �A ._-• �v i,'.7..).. �. 1 l .1 f �J 'i F t� r p1 3 .Nr- J �-r LljiS R- _ r f,� 1 �$ `i"'- - {}!._. '`y,,' N -it .,S..Sap� � .1 �•.�. litftola/!,•4•'-,j. _ ltr �,, , "` r. { i, #�i'}. i, _r,.. ,._ .-•f. Il ( ,..-.---s,'`..,--=,,,-.-..1,,.:•--,- v� 5i�.-s 'l y i '1 t-t' . u:_ ;.u.. uf (t��I_ �' LL• ,#��{{i��- t -t;-�P!; � ,�,``-�` � _ 1YE l��t �- ' k �i `i � �h- y '� s� ;��„ J�, ;�s �•04.11,-(4,4')--4.. (� q` {i r'vr-'s `� ,� '.T`•- �} :,,:41,61.14_1------w$ -r,,, _ _ � •.ai�°_ 1 i �.-; i0. yri — {. •. +r.If --,} e, } - - } ` 1 " ^J' y ''' r. '`''- (,!-t.L R I t ,F F:N + A 9 -, ,t,1„,, ts 1,,i4, • it l} } �,_ R ?� i� �� ( Y�. Y �1:•4 • i1p, `r n 1 r �' t �erw, ' - n ''� r,> \, J. �``'` 11 I 'Gs ��"t �. .� wow jS. vyr iiEIIIITeg `R' r = �'jIl .: 1. _ K. ,� J f • • er }cL'• �M .. \ $� 1) �,` r > -- > '",.-h;.t _'=l _ K t;.. a 1---,-:'y t t t.tijlt a ilri4ts t,,lii iA�%j � � 3� - 4.,�,t i' ,".-ram 'I . , - '{, - .$e?`' .'t - Mai _ .x .+mow a lw t `�}(jt iv N t ''' �a ))��y :i _,�.%�r� _ ') )"/ �p;'�.� s. urea yStStlN 7-' - `" "d�-w ,�,,' k 'q. -e _, '%. •la Ea,"L ►1 rj r� %=y r c, t ��i ua,jit+rS'.a 4 .• _.G `� K y -t t '7 r 416,1,...4, • �J Vol map; tli ♦ :'m om i* w.1R ,) II.4' 1 ?r;�f5 �o•, l'.,'„r, F �A m J t ,Ik J l iiim.,'\gilt' antito&Iraq t ,.� _ \ W :4,1.,--,.7---,s6.1. ,. -1f" '- S ., t I- - ''� III • 4Igf , �7 k ;k `L #'; .., ,-1.1 \ \r 7,''j, 1 t (1,: ,.'11,.. +i r� i1 Cy,. ;41 zm 1..t r G.n is Alin' � >y,:' ,1 ., _�-h int r "�? w v `h , q.� �Cii1 , �I,.4 81 k;, r tli,. f r? Ir {Ya ( : , ;--_ t' ��iJiJiJ'''111 .� ", aV th♦� '� t3i+ta ll1iig Jim on ti y:, �.s , _ •1 �,M, t i � � 'i 1 w�1+�ryt�Y��'. ,�,'� .� 'ri• a� 7 �,�,amrrm � Q�� ' __,. �1 y q i i -,/141,,i.:+-. ;\\ }f ,� ��'t�k �l�� r} 9 ,l r ,:_,..1-i..,_ an 9 r' ..... lla r �J��S " � 1� 'I',� w^n�.i`h .�i - ,,II $� k ��pp � 'S, �tt uT,SI Ili t . .; Y gra •• i Ju ry'' ., r Yn �X I/1iIF �� ,.of ,i 1.0m; _- ,n swit: • rpt ` ¢ ,� IL. �,, i{i� s j also _. `rAda eil k ..�`. ' '' 4 l{tl "l"` 1-44 th r " r S "'1 a ?1 1 n *,`# 11�is - _ f , . 1-r �rl.',Amman ��-Y��` f r r_.?-`',417-^+rta '� � -_ ';��y � €�4'Et$��i j f:" 'r" .. #�-- _ _�.-.�-;��1�� gr.( _ ,._i�. tfyw'!;i��;,.. q t .l �4.441- r- • t � - ., , `n "7 .� ir- -? rlft�! ° t ii +.,:.:i tt i--u{Ar -€, ,.J '' c .w r; •;ftlltri ..mk•Y .i wN(.i I _�t�l t =teas \ .,r/ ��3s, { c #+, �:� • `� '�'{ �11r`;i r l � t��t � �EiY{ A� E y a . tf R '34iitll,'`1 'J > 1'\E' 4s• !f'$t ' -,_a:, _ _ il.. 1 I,\'7.S 1]• c i'•+x".;fil 6. »i"".,<:m,. ,d ,- 1 r d t j�,+st c ♦ } $t , Ist 1{t,t.!`i .a i ;Si i +':<., cc' f r _ ' Vii°?'-- ,�'••+ $#E 'r 'w.:- ;, , {1 i) ..;j��ott{'t'1f111 .: "' iktilj t�tFl. ,x�} il,fi s" >i: t,a+ =r� "� �... ?9dsi„TT'� t2 .�- }` �.. t _ . r' .. .:.44::::''''' q, .. .k, ., ,� ` 1 tsr}l.} p _ it ltt§1.1`it: r i, t aW x1 ,;; +ili , ', . t h�� ” ,l,t,, ,L..+2!4,{,.i;f[iH. 1� t, e. 1 k ...,:r,r,.i,i:c-c;, rit t..lii�ttt,.1 tjfl.i � ,a<�?vwli, ,-yH"il ! ys �)-,yr �p 't ].'u+y.t;w:w• � ''`yy 1 �A ee}¢s r1 t 1 . i„ . .t _ _ .:�Il� \ t ,u^��"t i i,{',ll ""il:�ki. , i )4 1€F t3 ,111:;.114 S: St Yif}3 I' i.- . •v•04-0-4,-;-a,,•:.•, ;;,,,� ,i {'St.rl kix-'! ■ ♦ #, 414,11'4,_ 1� � / . \.� ice'. .,:i t }.ti$� r,z t>,1 , ,:, �f i t �a ,:._.. c..� ,4s.+svtu Erl J. ,„,,,<-7..„...:.-,.--t,,,..--.. : . �}1. � .;-i. t<^t. ]•� Wl.��.. ,� .,} S<. # .� t r+c z f s1 n. fil S IF .. �€$�. ..,.,1 x� \ ils# �,,.. ,, .%�� ao t � , ,,:� 1,1 ar It ,.,xi- � tl$i t v�.t• 9i l,t �, h..x , tm, . ,,g...; .. No .. :j: • F.-� rj�, _,"t ��. . q,l,.44.1, f � �� +� �1 '1 sr r `# i i t 1, r i r, 't i ”. ,. 70, ''y,,44$0,44.4,F#1,0 . -,-,- �..wt�lt. , m .. qyY. w `; s i} , 4"+t t a,f ,:i;$i'{• l F... '�,a`r ii, ,a;. ! .('(,inti,iiitjt:! i + �} t:,.ll. , `; moi ,,,y) , i4,. _S'. - �,, _ '> -.u.A►! V: ��j{p; I� �� _ q E tit IL' '� .v`t+`.1 ti`Z'E...g.t# Ii,N€:..r l t l{,t .i € m „jj�xSrx``Gy,?tt z tUtf i$t.llt lE",tC'<' y`$ 'S..:t..� ( €1",.71 ,' �: �.w�{r� 4 rim ,� '� ,r$i.tt?Ijra,urtlE t}$ t1r a �srt s,u�� 1•.�'� ,.�s tH�t €1\. i.��- PI �(. ,,yyqq�� , � �J .CL. �. y � � rte€ :� (Vy`. mg 1. ti .$ l t i! t i •;4 J: ( tl ti. t'i {{ tEo''tty �Et" i[l1 } Y',04 L € . }4 .:'. _.c_ � - �1 iuR'I .Gly 4'-� �8, ', - $t i slit t l a lr( s i to, a j at <C #^ SIEf S t 1 ee y to ij Hrict)4 t '. da:.., t4- }Y^. Nim I�t ;.z•.�._,y tr { ,-+r gi i n t is- pie_ ,`� -,t.., �7. ,r. y/ �;"_r''�t. , ft, \�� • rPe xbt tt "i !#; „"""�; ��4' 4 � 4�4,52t� td rn tY+h ..:� l yk p... i Y'u 1, �, !-. _�"' e+� '/�� tr•. _ ��. Itisrts u �,+ } L`{Qt r4 -# ir+st '�"+ ��'�-�IP [ s,:—>�� 1 �. ti"'` � � r _ '� sin • ttl ?,;.. ,�,tn 'P r» a13` to m,a` O+s+ i r+,.1 2 a� 1+ .' t,t" °� u , tj t .m w 1t, k s �1� �r� ;LS 'y qr ti r- �• g;.,q �":t.to•�`T�{stt.�€,3>3 :,w... .•u t��nr' «;�A3I' x`6 '�'�►+. r: q - .. t .: c:L�'I` iiriw"1' �3:. '>lti7i �s _ r t`�✓ 'J .!#F\� - `� �.... „,k,.. it,5.,,±+.?„:.a"_..,.mea,a#.`�i...tteik:!?eltlreirr-. ..„, ... °'�i ��r r • .. ._.;crlli' s,' .ron_...�t_I,• !!! i:' Liberty Annexation 2 Ft Contours 0 1000 2000 Topography Pro osed Annexation Areac .ittaatti „-,Y ��,t, Economic Development,Neighborhoods&Strategic Planning rity Limits Ale 'i,Administrator 1 • 1 2000 IFN,z 3 ban Growth Boundary 1 1 (it. King County Department of Assessments Scott Noble %me Administration Division Assessor ADM-AS-0712 500 Fourth Avenue Seattle, WA 98104-2384 206-296-5198 Fax 206-296-0595 assessor.info@metrokc.gov www.metrokc.gov/assessor/ ANNEXATION PETITION CERTIFICATION THIS IS TO CERTIFY that the petition submitted May 14, 2007 to the King County Department of Assessments by Don Erickson, Senior Planner for the City of Renton, supporting the annexation to Renton of the properties described as the Liberty Annexation, have been examined, the property taxpayers, tax parcel numbers, and assessed value of properties listed thereon carefully compared with the King County tax roll records, and as a result of such examination, found to be sufficient under the provisions of the Revised Code of Nape Washington, Section 35A.01.040. The Department of Assessments has not verified that the signature on the petition is valid through comparison with any record of actual signatures, nor that the signature was obtained or submitted in an appropriate time frame, and this document does not certify such to be the case. Dated this 31st of May, 2007 e,e8Wr Scott Noble, King County Assessor Nome •®I202M NAME OF PROPONENT: Curtis Schuster R4002. 07 ADDRESS OF PROPONENT: l3,)O A'5 ;g'� 51-rear 5 *co CITY OF RENTON BELL&T / Mg -Irf010 PHONE NUMBER OF MAY O 2007 • PROPONENT: 9-06 -.14/- .))i) RECEIVED Nog CITY CLERK'S OFFICE NOTICE OF INTENTION TO COMMENCE ANNEXATION PROCEEDINGS UNDER RCW 35A.14.120 (Direct Petition Method) 10% PETITION—LIBERTY ANNEXATION TO: THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RENTON City Hall, c/o City Clerk 1055 South Grady Way. Renton, WA 98057 The undersigned are the owners of not less than ten percent (10%) invalue, according to the assessed valuation for general taxation, of property which they desire to annex to the City of Renton. We hereby advise the City Council of the City of Renton that it is our desire to commence annexation proceedings under the provisions of RCW 35A.14.120 of all or any part of the area described below. The territory proposed to be annexed is within King County, Washington, and is contiguous to the City of Renton. A map (Exhibit 1) and legal description (Exhibit 2) are included as part of this petition. The City Council is requested to set a date not later than sixty days after the filing of this request for a public meeting with the undersigned. 1. At such meeting, the City Council will decide whether the City will accept, reject or geographically modify the proposed annexation; 2. The City Council will decide whether to require simultaneous adoption of a proposed zoning regulation, such a proposal having been prepared and filed for the area to be annexed as provided for in RCW 35A.14.330 and 35A.14.340; and, 3. The City Council will decide whether to require the assumption of existing city indebtedness by the area to be annexed. This page is the first of a group of pages containing identical text material. It is intended by the signers that such multiple pages of the Notice of Intention be presented and considered as one Notice of Intention. It may be filed with other pages containing additional signatures which cumulatively may be considered as a single Notice of Intention. Page 1 of 2 WARNING: Every person who signs this petition with any other than his or her true name, or who knowingly signs more than one of these petitions, or signs a petition seeking an election when he or she is not a legal voter, or signs a petition when he or she is otherwise not qualified to sign, or who makes Nome herein any false statement, shall be guilty of a misdemeanor. The undersigned have read the above petition and consent to the filing of this petition. (Names of petitioners should be in identical form as the name that appears on record in the title to the real estate.) tit i ,C �,,.,�{: 2.:.ss,y.�,,3. q@ iY,�y� X n":r' .vzaC.. `;23,S-Y. ,.xxJ's^Y»,:�'=`. .sfi'fle% fi .Lli .L\! a :�7`" f^-v - - x i � � �.. v�..ya,�z,�..�^ ,,,��y' :�A..111:-;:44055,411 .�.tikr— 'd". ,s .. � 3Y,;,:. ' .t :.":x�`;r- i+= U q ��.y y� Sz �.e h«._._ ]P'. �tl,wF r-��V V12 Sf�' .,��. � . • k,. .., r ;.. �y Qr rifit"t(ti4N.4410: ir. �4 8 s _ :•- '�._ .-.123 ,Ott, r a.t a;. `a's .Y` x:..ra';da, * u�`,�'"�• ' ';"` -:s�t?� „z_;s> �:� 4.si '�-2;'>2c�e��-�7,• `s# ,y,��:X� :�a;>^ -'yy<�� y. ,•v�!�j},��'r: =„ a i'., v,ii• .:y+3 £; "1''`f-SSn"v-.2X-'•'rJ'�-:`.• en n LO L7 nH':� :vy � er3•'= .:E'-'r�£.r�'2 ��.:��`"..,�`�7-°;"-^-z.��- �,5, y�e�r�,e;a,�; k ,,�„�'-'.+.�sff411#111010=-Oft' �Tg=7�.t1�n:�� {� .a'�#--T t4- .s:-:;-.�; •'h',•_ b,s'„Z> v:` _ >.. ,Y!*l4[Li Record'' :: ,a _ _ ... € ;r:::3 :.:t.:..=,.�v; e �Z- c.�.l+. _ .�.F �'��.''/=C �„a�3� rsy- .>....- .,a�e- _Y„ ,� r ,. ..+_.,-_.,r. J w3 yrs .. .s e 3�:: moi.:.,?c_s,3,,�:"..'- k.'.�•�'.� ">. ' x�.�..... .>-..<.�'a-��. �.-d+t r., �a., _-_a,.<�„ :�:-sr,:-�,-,,,:v.a: ,t ,r.. - �`it?:•01`,,L!�t '�s:. 1. 2. 3. 4. `'err 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. 10. Page 2 of 2 H:\DIVISION.SIP&TS\PLANNING\ANNEX\10%Notice of Intent.doc\OD m�. MIP r,=N� IN a, ■■ mr r�i 8th St COMM I: NIIIN BIM IW ire ■ ■' s 1 1lilt�r II r14..„1t ��:� ' = OC p■■�• ±±111J : ".' liil//L�77 �'rl:■ . anon �� II 1� 1111711111Ma IN ORME it ■� lip 441. .."IP a. IIMMIN a raj Par = MIIE t&'k ■�■ ir. um NE 2nd IISt �4," ■■�.� r..w sminutsill© 11 ■mawt�rl r ..q;, .�. nd1 .t II! ■■�L■W Mil iE Ms N■L ! Jr,. _Eisminummilismorm lilftim =min fes El IIII - INN �pNC� Q I - :is ■r■INu�■ rr� - ■■■nn■■■■22 rimilimmilINI In man MN1111111111 IN nim Briarwoo• �1Lw4p. ‘40 r ' ' SE 134thma .tom Elem . �.► .qi1 �� -off o I W '34th St 1apfewo�t:��1� u •y W 1.� a�E"i SE 2nd PI Heights IIIlII:Ilii�� * � �l mIll ils.I Iip ,I. Awn ` w man eauU17� Baia OMNI O!!!!!!,1 i E-t.-- . . cn -= rZpZYi7 1 r __l 13 a) N • MinnNI ... mamma mai Park Park ,■ MUM ma Timm -■ „ \\ Park _ um UM n�� .GiN o mommour,-7•71:p 'dorm- tom g„ ap■ 1 � �1 I �� th IFS.I MIUR1V --i- wad mai• i to --ow-r- Z MOWNnr� Park ! ��' n mho "'.."rel 4E. :■la L y r I I 1mi mu-. -- IIYTal■unm■;' Li�bje[r�ty >..( ,m ,--r-=z-------°' �\ SE 9t t .. 4 I .I h SII. • L�11� f I.J. .inV3 I. kitipi`' ■ = ism,� . / :ryaa j `o � mos "" \o • NW l4 ■1 3i ■�N Park n• t Its , ounamr ■r or.ram MP f:fes NM Ito ms r� ii ��N — — 11 e- WWI mem �� Mai =1" _1" � 1 ES ■W ■ �� di al ''„-/61 •' '� L-_ _L_ nil al Nu is is R • mum 7�■�►� mil- - rooua ma..�11111122 IIII WIN NNW silibill V 144th St. OMad I 1 ] I Hi di it-ww-g• r "Er—r --� — re;IIVII 11,...1"1 i ow 4.. dArs rdy . ,,,, in,„„„ mi, ra - ...4,4mn. eine. Is immuurpq ' Amiugur Viiv-),A, '161-411maj ev; PI s: op or A , . �� N.iNf►�� ■ �+ Maywood IL- 'I A ri El��L�i1�D/�■ ii �� M.S. r 5� w • at 11INNN= ■i Ma i -ZIT i i I . Ma �� r �� Q� / �.�,4..I. ,........ .....— . il i 14..._ � 4u 14 t fti C•1�� .. limm o 1000 2000 Liberty Annexation 1• Proposed Annexation Area 1328m2asammoggeosa2822288amagmo :::. Er- c:, o, Economic Development,Neighborhoods&Strategic Planning City Limits 1 1 Alex pietsrh,Admitnstrator 1 12000 ~� ' .E.p pan Growth Boundry )-- 'PF -. 11 Ap h� Exhibit 2 %we LIBERTY ANNEXATION LEGAL DESCRIIMON That portion of the Southwest quarter and the Northeast quarter and the Southeast quarter of Section 14, Township 2 North, Range 5 East, W.M., and that portion°Idle Southlver quarter of Section 13, Township 23 North, Range 5 East, W.M., and that portion of the Northeast quarter of Section 23, Township 23 North, Range:5 East. W.M., in Kine County, Washington, described as follows: Begjaning at the Southwest corner of the Northeast quarter-ofsaid Section 14; hence east along the south line of said Northeast quarter to the-intersection with the southerly extension of the west line ail:lock 2 ofianett'sRenton Boulevard Tracts as per plat filed in Volume 17 of Plats. Page 60. records of King County, Washington. thence north along said west line to the intersection with the north line of the south 130 feet of Lot 5 of said Block 2; cast along said north line to the intersection with the east fine of said Block thence north along said cast line,to the intersection with the westerly extension of Itteac di lute of Southeast 13_2" Place as dedicated for the subdivision of \vegi first Addition as per plat tiled in Volume-68 of Plats, Page 6, records of 1<trig(:uunly, Washington; '11.0e thence eust along said north line and as easterly projection to the intersection with ice west line of Block 2 of Cedar Park Five Acre Tracts as per plat filed in ilun ie 15 of Plats. Page 91 records of King County. Washington; titc:licc south along said west line to the beginning-ofa curve located at the --it-iithwesi corner of Lot I_ Block 2 of the subdiYision-of Derry Hurst as-dedicated cer pho filed in Volume 66 of Plats. Page 74. records of King County, ashington: thence along said curve to the north margin of Southeast 136th Street as dedicated hy said subdivision of Derry Horst: timiee along said north margin-of Southeast 13e Street to the Southwest cornm- orWock 1 of said Sttbdi vi sum of Cedar River Five Acre Tracts; tik:nce east along-the south line of said Block 1 and its easterly projection to the iniersectionof the east line of said Section 14: thence south along said east line-to its intersection with the south line of the north t) feel-of said Section 23 a)so'being the south ff)Argin'of Southeast 14e'Street; thence along staiiisOuthinargin to an angle point in said-margitn-adedicated for id ;ubdiyisioriofBriarwood South No, 4 as per plat-filed in Volume 91 of Plats, Page 74, records of King County, 'Washington; thence alotig said margin to the intersection with the southerly extension of the east line of Block 3 of said Cedar River Five Acre Tracts; thence north along said east line to the north line of Lot 7 of said Block '*4020e thence west along said north line to the west line of said Block 3; 'god thence south along said west line to the intersection of the easterly extension ot the north Tine of Carolwood'a4.petplat filed in Volume 11 of Plats, Panes 99 to 100,records of King County, Washington; thence west along said north1iiieiitis westerly projection to the intersection with the west line of the Southeast quarter of said Section 14: ihenee north along said west line to the point of beginning. FOGEIIIER WITH the east 30 feet of the Southwest quarter of said Section 14, lying aorthe*, of the westerly projection of the north line of Carolwood as per plat filed in Voi 11 tf Plas, Pages 99 to 100,records of King County, Washington A ,S0 I iETUEi.R W1TH that portion of 164 A venue Southeast dedicated tbr the Stjb-diVt0.1t ofsererin:Park as per plat tile -in Volume 24 or Hats. Pages 72 to 73. records tKintt County. WashingtOn. I i lit King County, Washington -3 az'x e- • GENTfa , \<)p N r!. A. TJ e vor :' 202 jzjNO1111 \r s\-\ +-9 <" c 9803? 4 C..74 I 253- (; Phon,,' - 7 ciO.S'Fox *41004 Return Address: City Clerk's Office City of Renton 20040729000541 1055 South Grady Way CITY OF RENTON COV 23.00 Renton, WA 98055 07/29//200 00534 KING COUNTY, WA DECLARATION OF COVENANT AND Property Tax Parcel Number: ANNEXATION AGREEMENT 3C6 3–C1—0/00 NEW DEVELOPMENT Street Intersection or Project Name: / yL,152-M,VA ACe- Grantor(s): Grantee(s): �7' 1 i s f'• 1. Cityof Renton, a Municipal A p a ��/✓ pal Co rpora tion The Agreement executed herein between the City of Renton,Washington,a municipal corporation,hereinafter referred to as"CITY"and the Grantor(s),as named above and/or successors in interest of certain property,hereinafter referred to as "OWNER",is for and in consideration of the furnishing of utility service by the CITY to certain property of the OWNER hereinafter referred to as"PROPERTY". The OWNER does hereby petition for annexation of the PROPERTY to the CITY,does hereby agree to the conditions of annexation herein,and does hereby declare this covenant. 1. ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS AND REPRESENTATIONS "Ihe Grantor does hereby acknowledge and agree as follows: 1.1. The OWNER is the owner of certain PROPERTY,which is located outside the corporate limits of the °carr CITY. 1.2. The OWNER is seeking Preliminary Plat approval from King County for the PROPERTY. 1.3 The OWNER has requested the CITY to furnish sewer service to the PROPERTY. 1.4. This Agreement to extend sewer service outside the corporate limits of the CITY is authorized by RCW 35.67.310 and RCW 35.92 170 and shall not be construed as a voluntary agreement pursuant to RCW 82.02.020 and therefore the provisions of RCW 82.02.020 shall not be applied hereto. 1.5. This Agreement does not preclude any evaluation and determination by the CITY that later development actions or proposals undertaken by the OWNER may require a determination of significance and envirorunental review under SEPA. 1.6. Per Renton Municipal Code Section 4-6-040,the owner of property in Renton's Potential Annexation Area shall execute a commitment to future annexation and compliance with certain other conditions as a prerequisite for the extension of or connection to the City's sanitary sewer system outside of the City Limits. 1.7. A CITY'S requirement of an annexation agreement or a commitment to future annexation as a condition of extending utility service outside the corporate limits of the CITY is recognised by Washington law. 1.8. The PROPERTY is located within the CITY'S POtENTIAL ANNEXATION AREA or URBAN SERVICE AREA for annexation purposes as adopted by the CITY in its Comprehensive Plan pursuant to the King County Countywide Planning Policies. DECLARATION OF COVENANT AND Property Tax Parcel Number: ANNEXATION AGREEMENT y —0/00 NEW DEVELOPMENT Street Intersection or Project Name �il'1_iZT3t c✓ race,- 3.3 The OWNER recognizes that the laws of the State of Washington relating to the annexation of property by a city provides that property may be annexed to a city if property owners sign a petition for such an annexation. The OWNER recognized and agrees that by signing this Agreement,the PROPERTY of the OWNER will automatically be included as a property to be annexed in the event PROPERTY is within a proposed annexation area_ The OWNER further recognizes that there are other methods of annexation allowed under the laws of the State of Washington, including the election method. 3.4 The OWNER understands that the OWNER'S signatures on this Agreement is an admission that the OWNER understands the certain rights which the OWNER has regarding the PROPERTY and that the OWNER is willingly waiving such rights in consideration of receiving the described utility services. 3.5 The undersigned OWNER of the PROPERTY,on behalf of himself/herself/themselves,his/her/their heirs,successors and assigns,hereby designate(s)the CITY as OWNER'S true and lawful attorney-in-fact for the purpose of signing any petition leading to the annexation of said PROPERTY to the CITY,with full power to do and perform any proper act which the OWNER may do with respect to the annexation of said real property. The CITY may exercise this power through its City Clerk or otherwise as the CITY COUNCIL may direct. This Special Power of Attorney is given for the valuable consideration of the furnishing of sewer service by the CITY, and this Special Power of Attorney is further given as security for performance of the annexation covenant obligation set forth herein. This Special Power of Attorney is not revocable and shall not be affected by the disability of the principal. 4. AGREEMENT AND COVENENT OF CONDITIONS AND MITIGATION MEASURES The OWNER acknowledges that the CITY has a desire to have certain minimum development standards met for new developments in the CITY's Potential Annexation Area. The OWNER,in consideration of the CITY's agreement to provide sanitary sewer utility service to the PROPERTY and in recognition of the CITY's conditions for annexation of the PROPERTY,does hereby agree and covenant to submit their development plans to the CITY for review and approval prior to official submittal to King County. Except as may be waived by the CITY's Public Works Administrator or his/her designee,the minimum design standards that will be required are: 4.1 For developments with length of streets over 700' (seven hundred feet)there shall be two means of vehicular access. 4.2 Road pavement sections for residential streets shall be 4"(four inch)asphalt concrete pavement over 6" (six inch)crushed rock surfacing. 4.3 The OWNER shall provide record drawings of all of the constructed Public Work's facilities for the CITY's records. covnt annex new devel 2004105/27/04 Page 3 FORM 03 0008/bh/ DECLARATION OF COVENANT AND •- - Pterty Tax Parcel Number: ANNEXATION AGREEMENT 366 "37) '-0/0() *awe NEW DEVELOPMENT Street Intersection or Project Name Ittm IN WITNESS WHEREO have hereunto set my hand and seal the day and year as written below. 2 P/a i1/7 1(5s chat-20//i/ rad'P rantor gT,e(s) (,,:1;: ,, ,,, , 5- • otary Seal must,, within box STATE OF WASHINGTON )ss `�,.�. , ,,,I t COUNTY OF KING ) ��.JIIi%S G.I4;11,,f/ I certify that I know or have satisfactory evidence that ,4 Jt f. v Pi. 'T�zc% Oa',, 'S' i signed this instrument and X 7 N acknowledged it to be his/her/their free and voluntary act for the uses and purposes ..„4 . mentioned in the- ent. - / �� . ' " r 1 i,' i fl" dcX Notary Public in and for the State of Washington N,... Notary(Print) -6.S 6- • S -A GGe e/ My appointment expires: c-3 4 03- Dated: )3Dated: .S-c _ =a y DECLARATION OF COVENANT AND Property Tax Parcel Number: ANNEXATION AGREEMENT Project File#: Street Intersection or Project Name: "° IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and seal the day and year as written below. Notary Seal must be within box STATE OF WASHINGTON )ss COUNTY OF KING ) On this day of ,20 ,before me personally appeared to me known to be of the corporation that executed the within instrument,and acknowledge the said instrument to be the free and voluntary act and deed of said corporation,for the uses and purposes therein mentioned,and each on oath stated that he/she was authorized to execute said instrument and that the seal affixed is the corporate seal of said corporation. Notary Public in and for the State of Washington Notary(Print) My appointment expires: Dated: count annex new devel 2004\05/27/04 Page 5 FORM 03 0008/bh/ loIrr+ Return Address: City Clerk's Office .,,rr City of Renton 1055 South Grady Way 20051021001575 Renton,WA 98055 CITY OF RENTON AG 36.00 PAGE001 OF 005 KINGICOUNTY, WA1 DECLARATION OF COVENANT AND Property Tax Parcel Number: 2407900010 through -ANNEXATION AGREEMENT 2407900700 NEW DEVELOPMENT Street Intersection or Project Name: Evendell Grantor(s): Grantee(s): 1. SBI DEVELOPING, LLC 1. City of Renton,a Municipal Corporation The Agreement executed herein between the City of Renton,Washington,a municipal corporation,hereinafter referred to as "CITY"and the Grantor(s),as named above and/or successors in interest of certain property,hereinafter referred to as "OWNER",is for and in consideration of the furnishing of utility service by the CITY to certain property of the OWNER hereinafter referred to as"PROPERTY". The OWNER does hereby petition for annexation of the PROPERTY to the CITY, does hereby agree to the conditions of annexation herein,and does hereby declare this covenant. 1. ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS AND REPRESENTATIONS The Grantor does hereby acknowledge and agree as follows: 1.1. The OWNER is the owner of certain PROPERTY,which is located outside the corporate limits of the CITY. 1.2. The OWNER is seeking Preliminary Plat approval from King County for the PROPERTY 1.3. The OWNER has requested the CITY to furnish sewer service to the PROPERTY. 1.4. This Agreement to extend sewer service outside the corporate limits of the CITY is authorized by RCW 35.67.310 and RCW 35.92.170 and shall not be construed as a voluntary agreement pursuant to RCW 82.02.020 and therefore the provisions of RCW 82.02.020 shall not be applied hereto. 1.5. This Agreement does not preclude any evaluation and determination by the CITY that later development actions or proposals undertaken by the OWNER may require a determination of significance and environmental review under SEPA. 1.6. Per Renton Municipal Code Section 4-6-040,the owner of property in Renton's Potential Annexation Area shall execute a commitment to future annexation and compliance with certain other conditions as a prerequisite for the extension of or connection to the City's sanitary sewer system outside of the City Limits. 1.7. A CITY'S requirement of an annexation agreement or a commitment to future annexation as a condition of extending utility service outside the corporate limits of the CITY is recognized by Washington law. 1.8. The PROPERTY is located within the CITY'S POTENTIAL ANNEXATION AREA or URBAN SERVICE AREA for annexation purposes as adopted by the CITY in its Comprehensive Plan pursuant to the King County Countywide Planning Policies. .)Z-10 ` O1 DECLARATION OF COVENANT AND Property-Tax Parcel Number: : 2407900010 through ANNEXATION AGREEMENT 2407900700 NEW DEVELOPMENT Street Intersection or Project Name: Evendell 3.3 The OWNER recognizes that the laws of the State of Washington relating to the annexation of property by a city provides that property may be annexed to a city if property owners sign a petition for such an annexation. The OWNER recognized and agrees that by signing this Agreement,the PROPERTY of the OWNER will automatically be included as a property to be annexed in the event PROPERTY is within a proposed annexation area. The OWNER further recognizes that there are other methods of annexation allowed under the laws of the State of Washington, including the election method. 3.4 The OWNER understands that the OWNER'S signatures on this Agreement is an admission that the OWNER understands the certain rights which the OWNER has regarding the PROPERTY and that the OWNER is willingly waiving such rights in consideration of receiving the described utility services. 3.5 The undersigned OWNER of the PROPERTY,on behalf of himself/herself/themselves,his/her/their heirs,successors and assigns,hereby designate(s)the CITY as OWNER'S true and lawful attorney-in-fact for the purpose of signing any petition leading to the annexation of said PROPERTY to the CITY,with full power to do and perform any proper act which the OWNER may do with respect to the annexation of said real property. The CITY may exercise this power through its City Clerk or otherwise as the CITY COUNCIL may direct. This Special Power of Attorney is given for the valuable consideration of the furnishing of sewer service by the CITY, and this Special Power of Attorney is further given as security for performance of the annexation covenant obligation set forth herein. This Special Power of Attorney is not revocable and shall not be affected by the Nome disability of the principal. 4. AGREEMENT AND COVENENT OF CONDITIONS AND MITIGATION MEASURES The OWNER acknowledges that the CITY has a desire to have certain minimum development standards met for new developments in the CITY's Potential Annexation Area. The OWNER,in consideration of the CITY's agreement to provide sanitary sewer utility service to the PROPERTY and in recognition of the CITY's conditions for annexation of the PROPERTY,does hereby agree and covenant to submit their development plans to the CITY for review and approval prior to official submittal to King County. Except as may be waived by the CITY's Public Works Administrator or his/her designee,the minimum design standards that will be required are: 4.1 The OWNER shall provide record drawings of all of the constructed Public Work's facilities for the CITY's records. covnt annex new devel 2004 City of Renton108/16/05 Page 3 FORM 03 0008/bh/ DECLARATION OF COVENANT AND Property Tax Parcel Number: : 2407900010 through ANNEXATION AGREEMENT 2407900700 `rrrS NEW DEVELOPMENT Street Intersection or Project Name: Evendell IN WITNESS WHEREOF,I have hereunto set my hand and seal the day and year as written below. Grantor Signature(s) INDIVIDUAL FORM OF ACKNOWLEDGMENT Notary Seal must be within box STATE OF WASHINGTON )SS COUNTY OF KING ) I certify that I know or have satisfactory evidence that signed this instrument and acknowledged it to be his/her/their free and voluntary act for the uses and purposes mentioned in the instrument. Notary Public in and for the State of Washington Notary(Print) My appointment expires: Dated: I DECLARATION OF COVENANT AND ANNEXATION AGREEMENT Property Tax Parcel Number: : 2407900010 through 2407900700 Project File#: KC#LO l P0016 Street Intersection or Project Name:Evendell IN WITNESS WHEREOF,I have i ereunto set my hand and seal the day and year as written below. CORPORATE FORM OF ACKNOWLEDGMENT Nota,, Seal must`ve 'thin box STATE OF WASHINRTON )ss Z N COUNTY OF K-R4G t' (N,•".s.1,) I— f3.&4 On this -1-)-71---\''''day of _�, a_\- .. ,201 ,before me personally appeared J Z W m ',-.E-L-20--N.---) -��`C=c to me known to co be \W; Y ,-c.cv •\V-1-'1-0,-.x.-C- of the corporation that • Q. J eexecuted the within insttument,and acknowledge the said instrument to be the free • }" Q W and voluntary act and deed of said corporation,for the uses and purposes therein Q tL Z i mentioned,and each on oath stated that he/she was authorized to execute said H O Z m instrument and that the seal affixed is the corporate seal of said corporation. OWQC / Notary Public in and for the State of Washington; Notary(Print) ( ç - ,r A\t; - My appointment expires: !�(-___\:_-) ,--_-3,;),, ). t_:. Dated: ,:'.<,.,----)---k , ')c-c----'ii covnt annex new devel 2004 City of Renton\08/16/05 Page 5 FORM 03 0008/bh/ NIS • Return Address: Nose CiClerk's Office 11,,‘11711 111.1 I II City of Renton 1055 South Grady Way Renton, WA 98055 20060616002235 CITY OF RENTON BS 36.00 PAGE001 OF @05 KING6COUNTY, UA8 DECLARATION OF COVENANT AND Property Tax Parcel Number: 1423059058 ANNEXATION AGREEMENT NEW DEVELOPMENT Street Intersection or Project Name:Nichols Place Grantor(s): Grantee(s): 1. Sound Built Homes, Inc 1. City of Renton, a Municipal Corporation The Agreement executed herein between the City of Renton,Washington,a municipal corporation,hereinafter referred to as "CITY"and the Grantor(s), as named above and/or successors in interest of certain property,hereinafter referred to as "OWNER",is for and in consideration of the furnishing of utility service by the CITY to certain property of the OWNER hereinafter referred to as"PROPERTY". The OWNER does hereby petition for annexation of the PROPERTY to the CITY, does hereby agree to the conditions of annexation herein,and does hereby declare this covenant. 1. ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS AND REPRESENTATIONS The Grantor does hereby acknowledge and agree as follows: 1.1. The OWNER is the owner of certain PROPERTY,which is located outside the corporate limits of the Atiore CITY. 1.2. The OWNER is seeking Preliminary Plat approval from King County for the PROPERTY. 1.3. The OWNER has requested the CITY to furnish sewer service to the PROPERTY. 1.4. This Agreement to extend sewer service outside the corporate limits of the CITY is authorized by RCW 35.67.310 and RCW 35.92.170 and shall not be construed as a voluntary agreement pursuant to RCW 82.02.020 and therefore the provisions of RCW 82.02.020 shall not be applied hereto. 1.5. This Agreement does not preclude any evaluation and determination by the CITY that later development actions or proposals undertaken by the OWNER may require a determination of significance and environmental review under SEPA. 1.6. Per Renton Municipal Code Section 4-6-040,the owner of property in Renton's Potential Annexation Area shall execute a commitment to future annexation and compliance with certain other conditions as a prerequisite for the extension of or connection to the City's sanitary sewer system outside of the City Limits. 1.7. A CITY'S requirement of an annexation agreement or a commitment to future annexation as a condition of extending utility service outside the corporate limits of the CITY is recognized by Washington law. 1.8. The PROPERTY is located within the CITY'S POTENTIAL ANNEXATION AREA or URBAN SERVICE AREA for annexation purposes as adopted by the CITY in its Comprehensive Plan pursuant to the King County Countywide Planning Policies. ®rrrr► DECLARATION OF COVENANT AND Property Tax Parcel Number: : 1423059058 ANNEXATION AGREEMENT NEW DEVELOPMENT Street Intersection or Project Name:Nichols Place 3.3 The OWNER recognizes that the laws of the State of Washington relating to the annexation of property by a city provides that property may be annexed to a city if property owners sign a petition for such an annexation. The OWNER recognized and agrees that by signing this Agreement,the PROPERTY of the OWNER will automatically be included as a property to be annexed in the event PROPERTY is within a proposed annexation area. The OWNER further recognizes that there are other methods of annexation allowed under the laws of the State of Washington, including the election method. 3.4 The OWNER understands that the OWNER'S signatures on this Agreement is an admission that the OWNER understands the certain rights which the OWNER has regarding the PROPERTY and that the OWNER is willingly waiving such rights in consideration of receiving the described utility services. 3.5 The undersigned OWNER of the PROPERTY,on behalf of himself/herself/themselves,his/her/their heirs,successors and assigns,hereby designate(s)the CITY as OWNER'S true and lawful attorney-in-fact for the purpose of signing any petition leading to the annexation of said PROPERTY to the CITY,with full power to do and perform any proper act which the OWNER may do with respect to the annexation of said real property. The CITY may exercise this power through its City Clerk or otherwise as the CITY COUNCIL may direct. This Special Power of Attorney is given for the valuable consideration of the furnishing of sewer service by the CITY, and this Special Power of Attorney is further given as security for performance of the annexation covenant obligation set forth herein. This Special Power of Attorney is not revocable and shall not be affected by the disability of the principal. 4. AGREEMENT AND COVENENT OF CONDITIONS AND MITIGATION MEASURES The OWNER acknowledges that the CITY has a desire to have certain minimum development standards met for new developments in the CITY's Potential Annexation Area. The OWNER,in consideration of the CITY's agreement to provide sanitary sewer utility service to the PROPERTY and in recognition of the CITY's conditions for annexation of the PROPERTY,does hereby agree and covenant to submit their development plans to the CITY for review and approval prior to official submittal to King County. Except as may be waived by the CITY's Public Works Administrator or his/her designee,the minimum design standards that will be required are: 4.1 The OWNER shall provide record drawings of all of the constructed Public Work's facilities for the CITY's records. count annex new devel 2005 City of Renton\05/18/06 Page 3 FORM 03 0008/bh/ DECLARATION OF COVENANT AND Property Tax Parcel Number: : 1423059058 erre ANNEXATION AGREEMENT NEW DEVELOPMENT Street Intersection or Project Name:Nichols Place IN WITNESS WHEREOF,I have hereunto set my hand and seal the day and year as written below. Grantor Signature(s) INDIVIDUAL FORM OF ACKNOWLEDGMENT Notary Seal must be within box STATE OF WASHINGTON )SS COUNTY OF KING I certify that I know or have satisfactory evidence that signed this instrument and acknowledged it to be his/her/their free and voluntary act for the uses and purposes mentioned in the instrument. Notary Public in and for the State of Washington Notary(Print) My appointment expires: Dated: DECLARATION OF COVENANT AND Property Tax Parcel Number: 1423059058 ANNEXATION AGREEMENT Project File#: KC#LO3P00I5 Street Intersection or Project Name: Nichols Place ' IN WITNESS WHERE©F)I hay ereunto set my hand and seal the day and year as written below. CORPORATE FORM OF ACKNOWLEDGMENT LEDGMENT Notary Seal must be within box STATE OF WASHINGTON )SS COUNTY QJING ). On this f� -day of M ,20(k,before me personally appeared -Ni: Fa Gc� 1=c-,cc�� to me known to .I `., ''% be wt�n r, tee. of the corporation that s• executed the within instrument,and acknowledge the said instrument to be the free `S:4: 1;401M)-A and voluntary act and deed of said corporation,for the uses and purposes therein • C_ mentioned,and each on oath stated that he/she was authorized to execute said inst ent and th t theesefal affixed *s the corrrporatee seal of said corporation. 24,6z ..- 141°;- �,�,i~iV-, otarlbed. c inAnd for/the St e o Washington 3,,,.�.,.,... Notarint) p74„, My appoin ent ex ares: Dated: � e/e)co °fi' covnt annex new devel 2005 City of Renton\05/18/06 Page 5 FORM 03 0008/bh/ ArmovED BY FINANCE COMMITTEE REPORT C COUNCIL June 25,2007 Date 25'°1007 APPROVAL OF CLAIMS AND PAYROLL VOUCHERS The Finance Committee approves for payment on June 25, 2007, claim vouchers 260800-261330 and 2 wire transfers, totaling $5,829,452.48, and 673 direct deposits, 262 payroll vouchers, and 0 wire transfers, totaling $2,199,304.10 . 61.N Don Persson, Chair 4 I • D-nis Law, Vice-Chair '1QtlL4r% Dan Clawson, Member APPFOVED BY i CITY COUNCIL Date d-25=24'o7 FINANCE COMMITTEE COMMITTEE REPORT June 25, 2007 REQUEST FOR UTILITY BILL ADJUSTMENT FROM THE RENTON HOUSING AUTHORITY (June 18, 2006) Due to two separate leaks that took some time to locate, the Renton Housing Authority requests an adjustment to their utility bills in the amount of$14,158.35. The Finance Committee recommends concurrence in the staff recommendation and approves the Renton Housing Authority's request. �,. Don Persson, Chair kkika4 Denis W. Law, Vice Chair Clawson, Member cc: Gregg Zimmerna,P/B/PW Administrator • Lys Horsby,Utility Systems Director Mike Bailey,FIS Administrator Linda Parks,Fiscal Services Director • Cindy Zinck,Finance Analyst Supervisor Elloyce Sumpter,Accounting Supervisor 2007_utility bill adjustment request from Renton Housing Authority.doc\ Rev 01/07 bh APPROVED BY TRANSPORTATION COMMITTEE Cnrir COUNCIL COMMITTEE REPORT Date -a5—ZD7 June 25, 2007 Agreement with Washington State Department of Transportation (WSDOT) for a City of Renton Project Coordinator (Referred June 4, 2007) The Transportation Committee recommends concurrence in the staff recommendation to authorize the Mayor and City Clerk to execute a GCA cooperative agreement with the Washington State Department of Transportation for a City of Renton Project Coordinator for the I-405, I-5 to SR 169 Stage 1 —Widening Project. The Committee further recommends that the resolution regarding this matter be presented for reading and adoption. 7§2A6C.0- 4/711g-- Marcie Palmer, Chair / v5 ' Don P- son, Vice-Chair Rani y Gorman, Member cc: Peter Hahn,Deputy PB/PW Administrator—Transportation Jim Seitz,Transportation Planning&Programming Supervisor Keith Woolley,Transportation Planning&Programming Connie Brundage,Transportation Systems Administrative Secretary APPROVED BY CITY COUNCIL PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT COMMITTEE Date �-�6.--46°7 COMMITTEE REPORT June 25,2007 Animals, Cluster, and Design Ordinance (Referred February 5, 2007) The Planning and Development Committee recommends concurrence in the staff recommendation to approve the Animals, Cluster, and Design Ordinance. The Committee further recommends that the ordinance be prepared for first reading. \44 Terri Briere, hair ., Dan awson pe Chair "Th6CA:-00— /a;IIAN Marcie Palmer, Member cc: 4ttreevington Alex Pietsch / 4,c f id X1/1-1om/ A ROV BY CM!COUNCIL Date ‘-,15..--,2607 UTILITIES COMMITTEE COMMITTEE REPORT June 25, 2007 Surface Water Utility Budget Transfer for SW 34th Street Culvert Replacement Project (June 4, 2007) The Utilities Committee recommends concurrence in the staff recommendation to transfer $150,000 to the 2007 SW 34th Street Culvert Replacement Project budget from the Surface Water Utility's approved 2007 budgets for the Lake Avenue South/Rainier Avenue South Storm System Replacement Capital Improvement Program project. The committee further recommends that the ordinance amending the budget be presented for first reading. Dan Clawson, C air i Terri Briere, Vice Chair . J' c-tut, Denis W. Law,Member cc: Lys Hornsby,Utility Systems Director Ron Straka,Surface Water Utility Supervisor Bang Parkinson,Finance Analyst Supervisor /9dopt d 6-015% 6200 7 CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON RESOLUTION NO. 38�� A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON RATIFYING AMENDMENTS TO THE COUNTYWIDE PLANNING POLICIES. WHEREAS, the Growth Management Act, RCW 36.70A.210 mandates the development and adoption of Countrywide Planning Policies for King County; and WHEREAS, King County, the City of Seattle, the City of Bellevue and the Suburban Cities of King County have met jointly as the Growth Management Planning Council (GMP) to develop and recommend Countywide Planning Policies; and WHEREAS, the City of Renton has ratified the Countywide Planning Policies and subsequent amendments, and WHEREAS, Countywide Planning Policy FW-1 Step 9 provides for an amendment process to changer the Planning Policies as may be necessary from time to time, and WHEREAS, On April 9, 2007, the Metropolitan King County Council took action ratifying the proposed amendments to the King County Countywide Planning Policies including: 1) GMPC Motion 06-01 Amendment to the Potential Annexation Area Map by including the area known as West Hill within the Potential Annexation Area of the City of Renton PAA and adding this area to the City of Renton's PAA. 2) GMPC Motion 06-02 Amendment to the Countywide Planning policies revising existing policy LU-25b to allow adjustment of househhold and employment targets if a new municipal incorporation occurs within a designated Potential Annexation Area(PAA). 1 RESOLUTION NO. 3) GMPC Motion 06-03 Amendment to the Countywide Planning Policies by designating the Overlake area of Redmond as an Urban Center. WHEREAS, the amendment process requires ratification of the proposed amendments by at least 30 percent of the City and County governments representing 70 percent of the population in King County, NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON, DOES RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS: SECTION I. The above findings are true and correct in all respects. SECTION II. The best interests and general welfare of the City of the City of Renton would be served by ratification of Ordinance 15709 (GMPC Motions 06-012, 06-02, and 06-03) as approved by the King County Council and the Growth Management Planning Council. PASSED BY THE CITY COUNCIL this day of , 2007. Bonnie I. Walton, City Clerk APPROVED BY THE MAYOR this day of , 2007. Kathy Keolker-Wheeler, Mayor Approved as to form: Lawrence J. Warren, City Attorney RES. 1279:06/20/07:ch 2 R9e�da flews 61. .r 9, 6, CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON e-./5-011 RESOLUTION NO. 3 8S7 afited 6d o 67 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON, AUTHORIZING THE MAYOR AND CITY CLERK TO ENTER INTO AN INTERLOCAL COOPERATIVE AGREEMENT WITH THE WASHINGTON STATE DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION (WSDOT) AUTHORIZING RELEASE OF STATE FUNDS IN THE AMOUNT OF $44,355.40 FOR IMPLEMENTATION OF THE CITYWIDE CTR PROGRAM." 1 WHEREAS, the City of Renton, pursuant to the Commute Trip Reduction Act, is required to develop and implement commute trip reduction plans; and WHEREAS, the Legislature has appropriated funds to provide technical assistance funding to the City; and WHEREAS, the Washington State Department of Transportation (WSDOT), by law, distributes these funds; and WHEREAS, it is necessary to document the terms and conditions under which the WSDOT will distribute commute trip reduction funds to the City; NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON, DOES RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS: SECTION I. The above recitals are found to be true and correct in all respects. SECTION H. The Mayor and City Clerk are hereby authorized to enter into an interlocal cooperative agreement with WSDOT entitled "Commute Trip Reduction Implementation Agreement" and later similar contracts that have the same general purpose, terms and funding. 1 RESOLUTION NO. PASSED BY THE CITY COUNCIL this day of , 2007. Bonnie I. Walton, City Clerk APPROVED BY THE MAYOR this day of . 2007 Kathy Keolker-Wheeler, Mayor Approved as to form: Lawrence J. Warren, City Attorney RES.1281:06121/07:ch 4 /?endo CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON 645-02007 RESOLUTION NO. 3888 lido ' .34,5---,200 7 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON AUTHORIZING THE MAYOR AND CITY CLERK TO ENTER INTO AN AGREEMENT WITH,,THI KING COUNTY FOR IMPLEMENTATION OF THE CITYWIDE CTR PROGRAM IN THE AMOUNT OF $38,060 TO SUPPORT ACTIVT IES5)F THE CITY OF RENTON AS REQUIRED UNDER THE STAT ' OF WASHINGTON COMMUTE TRIP REDUCTION(CTR) LAW. WHEREAS, the Washington Stat Legislature enacted the Commute Trip Reduction Act (Chapter 202, Laws of 1991, codified as RCW 70.04.521-551) to require local governments in those counties experiencing the greatest automobile-related air pollution and traffic congestion to develop and implement plans to reduce vehicle miles traveled per employee and single occupant vehicle commute trips; and WHEREAS, the City has, within its boundaries, one or more "major employees" and is required by RCW 70.94.527 to develop an implement a commute trip reduction plan; and WHEREAS, the local jurisdiction commute trip reduction plans are required to be coordinated and consistent with plans of adjacent jurisdiction and applicable regional plans; and WHEREAS, the City and King County desire to implement the Commute Trip Reduction Act consistent with the guidelines established by the state Commute Trip Reduction Task Force and with King County and other cities within the county; NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual promises and covenants herein, it is hereby agreed: SECTION L The above findings are true and correct in all respects. 1 RESOLUTION NO. SECTION II. The Mayor and City Clerk are authorized to enter into an agreement with King County for the implementation of the Citywide CTR Program. PASSED BY THE CITY COUNCIL this day of , 2007. Bonnie I. Walton, City Clerk APPROVED BY THE MAYOR this day of , 2007. Kathy Keolker-Wheeler, Mayor Approved as to form: Lawrence J. Warren, City Attorney RES: 1280:06/21/07:ch 2 e vi'scd 645- QOO7 CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON ildOp lCd t-.15--20a 7 RESOLUTION NO. Set? A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON AUTHORIZING THE TEMPORARY STREET CLOSURES OF SHATTUCK AVENUE SOUTH, RAINIER AVENUE SOUTH AND HARDIE AVENUE SOUTHWEST. WHEREAS, Burlington Northern Santa Fe (BNSF) Railway Company is replacing railroad bridges over Rainier Avenue South, Shattuck Avenue South and Hardie Avenie Southwest, and WHEREAS, construction is scheduled to begin August 1, 2007, and end on December 28, 2007, and WHEREAS, the street closures must be scheduled so that when Rainier Avenue South is closed, both Shattuck Avenue South and Hardie Avenue Southwest will be open for detours, and WHEREAS, the proposed closures will permit a compressed construction schedule which will minimize street closures, traffic disruption and construction noise in the area; NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON, DOES RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS: SECTION I. The above findings are true mid correct in all respects. �I �©+.tric� � SECTION II. Tl k do hereby authorize street closures as follows: Shattuck Avenue South will be closed from August 1, 2007, through August 10, 2007, and from August 16, 2007, to December 28, 2007; Rainier Avenue will be closed from 5 a.m.August 1t9,, 2007, to August 15, 2007 at 10 p.m. 1 RESOLUTION NO. Hardie Avenue SW will be closed from August 16, 2007, through August 20, 2007. PASSED BY THE CITY COUNCIL this day of , 2007. Bonnie I. Walton, City Clerk APPROVED BY THE MAYOR this day of , 2007. Kathy Keolker, Mayor Approved as to form: Lawrence J. Warren, City Attorney RES:1278:06/25/07:ch 2 i ldop/ed 6-as-aoo7 CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON RESOLUTION NO. 3 90 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON, AUTHORIZING THE MAYOR AND CITY CLE ' . "' ENTER INTO AN INTERLOCAL COOPERATIVE AGREE WITH THE WASHINGTON STATE DEPARTME I F TRANSPORTATION (WSDOT) CONCERNING FUNDING OF , A PROJECT COORDINATOR FOR THE I-405/1-5 TO SR169 STAGE ONE WIDENING PROJECT WHEREAS, the City and WSDOT have plans to widen I-405 from I-5 to SR169, and WHEREAS, the City and WSDOT have entered into a number of memoranda of understanding, agreements, and interlocal agreements concerning such widening, and WHEREAS, WSDOT wishes the City of Renton to provide a project coordinator for Stage One of the widening project with WSDOT providing certain funds for that position, and WHEREAS, it is necessary to detail the terms and conditions under which WSDOT will provide the funds and the City will provide the project coordinator, NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON, DOES RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS: SECTION I. The above findings are true and correct in all respects. SECTION II. The Mayor and City Clerk are authorized to enter into an Interlocal Cooperative Agreement with WSDOT concerning the provision by the City and payment by WSDOT of funds for a project coordinator for the I-405/1-5 to SR169 Stage One widening project. PASSED BY THE CITY COUNCIL this day of , 2007. Bonnie I. Walton, City Clerk 1 RESOLUTION NO. APPROVED BY THE MAYOR this day of , 2007. Kathy Keolker, Mayor Approved as to form: Lawrence J. Warren, City Attorney RES.1276:06//08/07:ch 2