Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
Council 04/24/2006
AGENDA RENTON CITY COUNCIL REGULAR MEETING April 24,2006 Monday,7:00 p.m. 1. CALL TO ORDER AND PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE 2. ROLL CALL 3. PROCLAMATIONS: a. Day of Prayer-May 4, 2006 b. Native Plant Appreciation Week-April 30 to May 6, 2006 4. SPECIAL PRESENTATION: 2006 Legislative Session Wrap-Up 5. PUBLIC HEARING: Annexation and R-8 zoning of 13.3 acres located south of Puget Dr. S. and east of 108th Ave. SE, if extended(Akers Farms) 6. ADMINISTRATIVE REPORT 7. AUDIENCE COMMENT "(Speakers must sign up prior to the Council meeting. Each speaker is allowed five minutes. The comment period will be limited to one-half hour. The second audience comment period later on in the agenda is unlimited in duration.) When you are recognized by the Presiding Officer,please walk to the podium and state your name and address for the record, SPELLING YOUR LAST NAME. 8. CONSENT AGENDA The following items are distributed to Councilmembers in advance for study and review, and the recommended actions will be accepted in a single motion. Any item may be removed for further discussion if requested by a Councilmember. a. City Clerk reports bid opening on 4/5/2006 for CAG-06-044,New Park Construction at 233 Union Ave. NE; three bids;engineer's estimate$1,134,000; and submits staff recommendation to award the contract to low bidder,Ohno Construction, in the amount of$994,990.14. Council concur. b. Community Services Department recommends approval of a contract in the amount of$63,509 annually with McKinstry Company for heating, ventilating, and air conditioning systems services at City Hall. Council concur. c. Development Services Division recommends acceptance of a deed of dedication for additional right-of-way at NE 19th St. to fulfill a requirement of the Veldyke Short Plat(SHP-05-065). Council concur. d. Transportation Systems Division recommends approval of an agreement in the amount of $2,736,425 with KPG,Inc. for design of the Rainier Ave. Improvements (S.4th Pl.to S. 2nd St.) and Hardie Ave. SW Transit/Multimodal Improvements projects. Council concur. e. Transportation Systems Division recommends approval of an agreement for a$5 million grant from Washington State Department of Community,Trade and Economic Development for utility improvements for the South Lake Washington Infrastructure Improvement project. Council concur. (See 1 La; for resolution.) f. Transportation Systems Division requests authorization to use approved project funding for three limited term employees to provide construction management and inspection services for the SR- 169 HOV Improvements and Duvall Ave.NE projects in the amount of$279,500. Refer to Finance Committee. (CONTINUED ON REVERSE SIDE) 9. CORRESPONDENCE 10. UNFINISHED BUSINESS Topics listed below were discussed in Council committees during the past week. Those topics Novi marked with an asterisk(*)may include legislation. Committee reports on any topics may be held by the Chair if further review is necessary. a. Committee of the Whole: The Landing Development Agreement b. Finance Committee: Vouchers; 2006 Budget Amendments (Carry Forward)* c. Transportation (Aviation)Committee: Sound Transit Funding Agreement for Rainier Ave. S., Hardie Ave. SW&SW 27th St./Strander Blvd. Projects*; Airport Quonset Hut#790 Bid Award 11. RESOLUTIONS AND ORDINANCES Resolutions: a. WA State Department of Community,Trade &Economic Development grant(see 8.e.) b. Sound Transit funding agreement for transportation projects (see 10.c.) Ordinance for first reading and advancement to second and final reading: Carry Forward Ordinance (see 10.b.) Ordinances for second and final reading: a. Approving the Hoquiam Annexation (1st reading 4/17/2006) b. Establishing R-8 zoning for the Hoquiam Annexation (1st reading 4/17/2006) c. Approving the Falk II Annexation (1st reading 4/17/2006)) d. Establishing R-8 zoning for the Falk II Annexation (1st reading 4/17/2006) e. Extending effectuation date for Phase II of Merritt Annexation.(1st reading 4/17/2006) 12. NEW BUSINESS (Includes Council Committee agenda topics;call 425-430-6512 for recorded information.) Lool 13. AUDIENCE COMMENT 14. ADJOURNMENT COMMITTEE OF THE WHOLE AGENDA (Preceding Council Meeting) Council Chambers 6:00 p.m. The Landing Development Agreement kilo, Hearing assistance devices for use in the Council Chambers are available upon request to the City Clerk • CITY COUNCIL MEETINGS ARE TELEVISED LIVE ON GOVERNMENT ACCESS CHANNEL 21 AND ARE RE-CABLECAST TUES.&THURS.AT 11:00 AM&9:00 PM,WED.&FRI.AT 9:00 AM&7:00 PM AND SAT.&SUN.AT 1:00 PM&9:00 PM RENTON CITY COUNCIL Regular Meeting April 24,2006 Council Chambers Monday, 7:00 p.m. MINUTES Renton City Hall CALL TO ORDER Mayor Kathy Keolker called the meeting of the Renton City Council to order and led the Pledge of Allegiance to the flag. ROLL CALL OF RANDY CORMAN, Council President; DON PERSSON; MARCIE PALMER; COUNCILMEMBERS TERRI BRIERE; DENIS LAW; TONI NELSON. MOVED BY LAW, SECONDED BY CORMAN, COUNCIL EXCUSE ABSENT COUNCILMAN DAN CLAWSON. CARRIED. CITY STAFF IN KATHY KEOLKER, Mayor; JAY COVINGTON, Chief Administrative ATTENDANCE Officer; LAWRENCE J. WARREN, City Attorney; BONNIE WALTON, City Clerk; GREGG ZIMMERMAN, Planning/Building/Public Works Administrator; ALEX PIETSCH, Economic Development Administrator; DON ERICKSON, Senior Planner; MICHAEL BAILEY, Finance and Information Services Administrator; LINDA HERZOG, Interim Assistant to the CAO; COMMANDER CHARLES MARSALISI, Police Department. PROCLAMATIONS A proclamation by Mayor Keolker was read declaring the day of May 4, 2006, Day of Prayer- 5/4/2006 to be "Day of Prayer" in the City of Renton in keeping with the wishes of the Congress of the United States and the Governor of the State of Washington, and encouraging all citizens to join in this special observance. MOVED BY CORMAN, SECONDED BY NELSON,COUNCIL CONCUR IN THE PROCLAMATION. CARRIED. Native Plant Appreciation A proclamation by Mayor Keolker was read declaring the week of April 30 Week-4/30/2006 to 5/6/2006 through May 6, 2006, to be "Native Plant Appreciation Week" in the City of Renton and encouraging all citizens to learn more about native plants and how to protect them, and to enjoy and appreciate the value and beauty of native flora. MOVED BY CORMAN, SECONDED BY NELSON, COUNCIL CONCUR IN THE PROCLAMATION. CARRIED. Mayor Keolker changed the order of business, as the special presentation speaker had not yet arrived. PUBLIC HEARING This being the date set and proper notices having been posted and published in Annexation: Akers Farms, accordance with local and State laws, Mayor Keolker opened the public hearing 108th Ave SE&Puget Dr S to consider the proposed annexation and R-8 zoning of 14.02 acres (including the abutting street right-of-way) located in the vicinity of SE 160th St., SE 164th St., 108th Ave. SE and 110th Ave. SE, if extended (Akers Farms). Senior Planner Don Erickson reported that five single-family dwellings exist on this site,which slopes generally downward to the northeast from the southwest corner. The northern portion of the site contains an unclassified coal mine hazard area. In regards to the public services, he noted that the site is within Fire District#40, the sewer service areas of Renton and the Soos Creek Water and Sewer District, the water service area of Soos Creek Water and Sewer District, and the Renton School District. Mr. Erickson stated that current King County zoning is R-8 (eight dwelling units per gross acre), and the Renton Comprehensive Plan designates the site as Residential Single Family for which R-8 (eight dwelling units per net acre)is proposed. He indicated that the fiscal impact analysis assumes a potential of 76 April 24,2006 Renton City Council Minutes Page 130 homes at full development, the replacement of the five existing homes,and an average new home value of$375,000. A $395 surplus is estimated at current development, and a$16,842 surplus is estimated at full development. Mr. Erickson noted the one time parks acquisition and development cost of$30,721. Mr. Erickson reported that the proposed annexation is consistent with City policies and Boundary Review Board criteria, and serves the best interests and general welfare of the City,especially if higher quality development is encouraged near Nelsen Middle School. He indicated that no major service issues were identified; however, City departments noted the cumulative impact of recent annexations,which will eventually require additional staff. Public comment was invited. There being none, it was MOVED BY BRIERE, SECONDED BY LAW,COUNCIL CLOSE THE PUBLIC HEARING. CARRIED. MOVED BY BRIERE, SECONDED BY LAW, COUNCIL: SUPPORT R-8 ZONING CONSISTENT WITH THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN; ACCEPT THE AKERS FARMS ANNEXATION; CONCURRENTLY REZONE THE SITE BY ADOPTING R-8 ZONING FOR THE 12.99-ACRE NON-STREET PORTION; AND PRESENT THE ORDINANCES FOR FIRST READING ON 5/8/2006. CARRIED. SPECIAL PRESENTATION Renton's State lobbyist, Doug Levy, presented the 2006 legislative session Legislature: 2006 State wrap-up report. He pointed out that typically one-half to one-third of the bills Legislative Session Wrap-Up introduced into the legislative process affect local government in some way. Mr. Levy highlighted the following items: • Streamlined Sales Tax-the full mitigation solution was held by the House Speaker due to political campaign and timing issues. • Annexation Financing-a new financing tool for large annexations was passed which could mean up to $4.5 million per year to help with annexation of areas such as West Hill and Fairwood. • Transportation- 1)additional flexibility for the Regional Transportation Investment District(RTID); 2)provision that allows formation of Transportation Benefit Districts with voter approval; 3) SR-169 designated a Highway of State Significance; and 4) new funding codified for the Transportation Improvement Board. • Budget- funding for law enforcement training academy and for inventorying buildable lands. • Economic Development-opportunity to compete for infrastructure financing. • Tax Incentives- 1)excise tax relief for certain aerospace suppliers; 2)new sales tax deferral for biotech manufacturing; and 3) State matching money for film and TV production. • Law Enforcement, Criminal Justice and Courts- 1)more than a dozen bills passed concerning sex offenders; 2)provisions for electronic ticketing; and 3)felony treatment of repeat DUI offenders. Mr. Levy noted that the mole trapping issue was held up in the process,as well as State/local agency liability limitations. Looking forward,he stated that more work lies ahead regarding issues such as eminent domain,transportation governance, sales tax streamlining, auto theft,potential RTID and Sound April 24,2006 Renton City Council Minutes Page 131 Transit joint ballot, and capital budget funding for the Chastain Trail(federal funding will also be pursued). In conclusion, Mr. Levy emphasized the following: legislative tracking, lobbying, and advocating has become a year-round business; it is important to monitor State initiatives, which can change and undo legislative action; and Renton's strategy to focus on a few issues has been a successful formula. ADMINISTRATIVE Chief Administrative Officer Jay Covington reviewed a written administrative REPORT report summarizing the City's recent progress towards goals and work programs adopted as part of its business plan for 2006 and beyond. Items noted included: • The Mayor's Planting Day on April 22nd was a success with over 60 volunteers planting trees and flowers in the downtown business district. * The Second Annual Community Garage Sale will be held at the Renton Community Center on April 29th. * The 2006 Summer What's Happening recreation brochure will be available beginning May 1st, with registration opening May 2nd for Renton residents, and May 4th for non-residents. AUDIENCE COMMENT Sandel DeMastus, Highlands Community Association(HCA)Vice President, Citizen Comment: DeMastus - 1137 Harrington Ave.NE, Renton, 98056, claimed that false information was Highlands Community given by a speaker regarding the association at the last Council meeting. Ms. Association DeMastus named the nine HCA board members, and shared their professional backgrounds. She stated that the HCA is a 501(c)(3)non-profit organization, who, like other neighborhood associations, left Renton's Neighborhood Program due to its rules. Ms. DeMastus emphasized that the HCA has done a lot for the Highlands area, and she is very proud of the association. Citizen Comment: Petersen - Inez Petersen, 3306 Lake Washington Blvd. N., #3, Renton, 98056, stated that Highlands Subarea Plan although she is excited about The Landing project as discussed during Committee of the Whole, the Highlands Community Association(HCA)is concerned about the related traffic issues. Ms. Petersen announced that HCA filed an appeal on the Environmental Review Committee's SEPA determination regarding the Highlands Subarea rezoning proposal. Ms. Petersen recommended that existing single-family dwellings and duplexes in the Highlands not become non-conforming. Property owners unwilling to upgrade the dwellings should be encouraged to sell to someone who will upgrade, and if they do not, she supports the City's enforcement of laws to acquire the property for development. Additionally, she recommended increased police presence, sidewalk repair and installation, and review of low- interest loans and non-profit assistance availability for low-income citizens. Ms. Petersen encouraged the City to consider a compromise between the area's current situation and high density development. Citizen Comment: McOmber- Howard McOmber, 475 Olympia Ave. NE, Renton, 98056, said he favors Highlands Subarea Plan upgrading the Highlands area. He agreed that upgrades to the zoning are also needed; however, the proposed zoning text still needs substantial revision. Emphasizing that the moratorium has stopped residents from upgrading their property, Mr. McOmber pointed out that residents should be allowed the freedom to improve the area. He stated that he wants to continue to improve the Highlands with the City's help, and stressed that time is needed to do it right and to work things out. etwassassis April 24, 2006 Renton City Council Minutes Page 132 CONSENT AGENDA Items on the consent agenda are adopted by one motion which follows the listing. CAG: 06-044,New Park City Clerk reported bid opening on 4/5/2006 for CAG-06-044, New Park Construction at 233 Union Construction at 233 Union Ave. NE; three bids; engineer's estimate $1,134,000; Ave NE, Ohno Construction and submitted staff recommendation to award the contract to low bidder, Ohno Construction, in the amount of$994,990.14. Council concur. Community Services: City Community Services Department recommended approval of a contract in the Hall Mechanical Maintenance, amount of$63,509 annually with McKinstry Company for heating, ventilating, McKinstry Company and air conditioning systems services at City Hall. Council concur. Development Services: Development Services Division recommended acceptance of a deed of Veldyke Short Plat, ROW dedication for additional right-of-way at NE 19th St. to fulfill a requirement of Dedication,NE 19th St the Veldyke Short Plat(SHP-05-065). Council concur. Transportation: Rainier Ave& Transportation Systems Division recommended approval of an agreement in the Hardie Ave SW Improvements amount of$2,736,425 with KPG, Inc. for design of the Rainier Ave. Design,KPG Inc Improvements(S. 4th Pl. to S. 2nd St.)and Hardie Ave. SW Transit/Multimodal Improvements projects. Council concur. Transportation: South Lake Transportation Systems Division recommended approval of an agreement for a WA Infrastructure $5 million grant from Washington State Department of Community,Trade and Improvement, CTED Grant Economic Development for utility improvements for the South Lake Washington Infrastructure Improvement project. Council concur. (See page 134 for resolution.) Transportation: Limited Term Transportation Systems Division requested authorization to use approved Positions Hire, Construction project funding for three limited term employees to provide construction Management& Inspection management and inspection services for the SR-169 HOV Improvements and Services Duvall Ave. NE projects in the amount of$279,500. Refer to Finance Committee. MOVED BY CORMAN, SECONDED BY NELSON, COUNCIL APPROVE THE CONSENT AGENDA AS PRESENTED. CARRIED. Added Correspondence was read from Dave S. Nguyen, 1422 Jefferson Ave.NE, CORRESPONDENCE Renton, 98056, and Nen Kim Phan, 1420 Jefferson Ave. NE,Renton, 98056, Citizen Comment: Various - expressing agreement with the City's Highlands Subarea rezoning proposal. Highlands Subarea,Zoning Text&Zoning Map Amendments UNFINISHED BUSINESS Council President Corman presented a Committee of the Whole report Committee of the Whole regarding The Landing project infrastructure agreement. The Committee Planning: The Landing Public concurred with the recommendation of the Administration to approve and Infrastructure, Transwestern authorize the Mayor and City Clerk to sign an agreement with Transwestern Harvest Lakeshore Harvest Lakeshore LLC outlining the coordination and timing of the roadway and utility improvements necessary to facilitate development of The Landing. MOVED BY CORMAN, SECONDED BY NELSON, COUNCIL CONCUR IN THE COMMITTEE REPORT. CARRIED. Mr. Corman indicated that the City is going forward with approximately $19 million in road improvements at the former Boeing property to support The Landing project. Finance Committee Finance Committee Chair Persson presented a report recommending approval Finance: Vouchers of Claim Vouchers 247523 -248017 and two wire transfers totaling $3,090,801.03; and approval of Payroll Vouchers 63025 -63191, one wire April 24,2006 Renton City Council Minutes Page 133 transfer, and 609 direct deposits totaling$1,947,403. MOVED BY PERSSON, SECONDED BY LAW, COUNCIL CONCUR IN THE COMMITTEE REPORT. CARRIED. Finance: 2005 Carry Forward Finance Committee Chair Persson presented a report recommending adoption Ordinance of the ordinance authorizing carrying forward appropriated funds not expended in 2005. This ordinance increases the annual 2006 Budget by$12,623,585. The Committee further recommended that the ordinance be presented for first reading and advanced to second and final reading. MOVED BY PERSSON, SECONDED BY LAW, COUNCIL CONCUR IN THE COMMITTEE REPORT. CARRIED. (See page 134 for ordinance.) Transportation(Aviation) Transportation (Aviation) Committee Chair Palmer presented a report Committee recommending concurrence in the staff recommendation to approve an Sound Transit: Rainier Ave S, interlocal agreement with Sound Transit to release their initial funding Hardie Ave SW& SW 27th contribution of$2,530,000 for the Rainier Ave. S., Hardie Ave. SW, and SW St/Strander Blvd Funding 27th St./Strander Blvd. projects. The Committee further recommended that the resolution authorizing the Mayor and City Clerk to sign the agreement be presented for reading and adoption. MOVED BY PALMER, SECONDED BY PERSSON, COUNCIL CONCUR IN THE COMMITTEE REPORT. CARRIED. (See page 134 for resolution.) CAG: 06-023, Airport#790 Transportation(Aviation) Committee Chair Palmer presented a report Building Construction, Lincoln recommending concurrence in the staff recommendation to accept the low bid Construction submitted by Lincoln Construction, Inc. for the Airport Quonset Hut Building #790 Construction project in the amount of$129,851. The Committee further recommended authorizing a fund transfer from the Airport's Airside/Landside Separation Fund in the amount of$118,420 to cover the cost of the contract, and authorizing the Mayor and City Clerk to sign the contract. MOVED BY PALMER, SECONDED BY PERSSON, COUNCIL CONCUR IN THE COMMITTEE REPORT. CARRIED. Planning& Development Planning and Development Committee Chair Briere presented a report Committee recommending that a public hearing be set on 5/8/2006 to consider extending Planning: Highlands Subarea the existing moratorium on new development in the R-10 and RM-F zones Plan Study Area Moratorium within the Highlands Subarea Plan study area. The purpose of this extended moratorium is to provide adequate time for resolution of the appeal of the SEPA determination on the Highlands Subarea rezoning proposal before the City Hearing Examiner, to allow the City Council to consider public testimony, and to review staff and Planning Commission recommendations concerning the appropriate density and use of land within the Highlands Subarea Plan study area, prior to adoption of a zoning text amendment and rezone proposal.* Councilwoman Briere stated that due to the filing of the appeal by the Highlands Community Association, it is prudent to extend the moratorium until the appeal goes through the process. *MOVED BY BRIERE, SECONDED BY PALMER, COUNCIL CONCUR IN THE COMMITTEE REPORT. CARRIED. RESOLUTIONS AND The following resolutions were presented for reading and adoption: ORDINANCES • April 24, 2006 Renton City Council Minutes Page 134 Resolution#3803 A resolution was read authorizing the Mayor and City Clerk to enter into an Transportation: South Lake interlocal agreement with the Washington State Department of Community, WA Infrastructure Trade and Economic Development for a$5 million grant for the South Lake Improvement, CTED Grant Washington Infrastructure Improvement project. MOVED BY LAW, SECONDED BY BRIERE, COUNCIL ADOPT THE RESOLUTION AS READ. CARRIED. Resolution#3804 A resolution was read authorizing the Mayor and City Clerk to enter into an Sound Transit: Rainier Ave S, interlocal cooperative agreement between the Central Puget Sound Regional Hardie Ave SW& SW 27th Transit Authority(Sound Transit)and the City of Renton, for the SW 27th St/Strander Blvd Funding St./Strander Blvd. Extension: West Valley Hwy. to Oakesdale Ave. SW project, and the Rainier Ave./Hardie Ave. SW Arterial Improvements project. MOVED BY LAW, SECONDED BY PALMER, COUNCIL ADOPT THE RESOLUTION AS READ. CARRIED. The following ordinance was presented for first reading and advanced for second and final reading: Finance: 2005 Carry Forward An ordinance was read amending Ordinance 5180 relating to the City of Renton Ordinance annual 2006 Budget, and carrying forward appropriated funds not expended in 2005,which increases the 2006 Budget by$12,623,585. MOVED BY PERSSON, SECONDED BY NELSON, COUNCIL ADVANCE THE ORDINANCE FOR SECOND AND FINAL READING. CARRIED. Ordinance#5202 Following second and final reading of the above ordinance, it was MOVED BY Finance: 2005 Carry Forward PERSSON, SECONDED BY NELSON, COUNCIL ADOPT THE Ordinance ORDINANCE AS READ. ROLL CALL: ALL AYES. CARRIED. Ordinance#5203 An ordinance was read annexing approximately 20.5 acres generally located Annexation: Hoquiam, 140th immediately north of NE 6th St., if extended, east of 140th Ave. SE, if extended Ave SE&NE 6th St to 144th Ave. SE, and bordered by SE 120th St., if extended, on the north (Hoquiam Annexation). MOVED BY BRIERE, SECONDED BY LAW, COUNCIL ADOPT THE ORDINANCE AS READ. ROLL CALL: ALL AYES. CARRIED. Ordinance#5204 An ordinance was read establishing the zoning classification of approximately Annexation: Hoquiam, R-8 20.5 acres generally located immediately north of NE 6th St., if extended, east Zoning of 140th Ave. SE, if extended to 144th Ave. SE, and bordered by SE 120th St., if extended, on the north,annexed within the City of Renton as R-8 (Residential -eight dwelling units per acre) zoning; Hoquiam Annexation. MOVED BY BRIERE, SECONDED BY LAW, COUNCIL ADOPT THE ORDINANCE AS READ. ROLL CALL: ALL AYES. CARRIED. Ordinance#5205 An ordinance was read annexing approximately 6.29 acres generally located Annexation: Falk II, 102nd immediately south of the north side of SE 185th St., if extended, on the north, Ave SE& SE 185th St the east side of 102nd Ave. SE, on the east, a line parallel and some 428 feet south of the northern boundary on the south, and approximately 100th Ave. SE, if extended, on the west(Falk II Annexation). MOVED BY BRIERE, SECONDED BY LAW, COUNCIL ADOPT THE ORDINANCE AS READ. ROLL CALL: ALL AYES. CARRIED. Ordinance#5206 An ordinance was read establishing the zoning classification of approximately Annexation: Falk II, R-8 6.29 acres generally located immediately south of the north side of SE 185th Zoning St., if extended, on the north, the east side of 102nd Ave. SE, on the east, a line parallel and some 428 feet south of the northern boundary on the south,and approximately 100th Ave. SE, if extended, on the west, annexed within the City April 24,2006 Renton City Council Minutes Page 135 of Renton as R-8 (Residential -eight dwelling units per acre)zoning; Falk II Annexation. MOVED BY LAW, SECONDED BY BRIERE, COUNCIL ADOPT THE ORDINANCE AS READ. ROLL CALL: ALL AYES. CARRIED. Ordinance#5207 An ordinance was read amending Ordinance 5142 by changing the timing to Annexation: Merritt II, SE 3/31/2007 for effectuating Phase II of the Merritt II Annexation to the City of May Valley Rd&Coal Creek Renton. MOVED BY LAW, SECONDED BY BRIERE, COUNCIL ADOPT Parkway THE ORDINANCE AS READ. ROLL CALL: ALL AYES. CARRIED. NEW BUSINESS Discussion ensued regarding the public meeting and public hearings scheduled Planning: Highlands Subarea for May 8th. Responding to Council inquiry, Economic Development Rezoning Appeal of SEPA Administrator Alex Pietsch clarified that the appeal of the SEPA determination Determination on the Highlands Subarea rezoning proposal puts on hold any action that staff could bring forth for Council's consideration regarding the proposal. City Attorney Larry Warren confirmed that Council is not restricted from discussing the matter as it is a legislative rather than a quasi-judicial topic. Community Services: Hanging Councilwoman Nelson reported that the hanging flower baskets are scheduled Flower Baskets to be hung in downtown Renton the week following Mother's Day(May 14th). AUDIENCE COMMENT In response to Inez Petersen's question, 3306 Lake Washington Blvd. N., #3, Citizen Comment: Petersen - Renton, 98056, about the public hearing on the appeal of the SEPA Highlands Subarea Rezoning determination on the Highlands Subarea rezoning proposal, City Attorney Appeal of SEPA Warren explained that the appeal will be sent to the Hearing Examiner who Determination establishes a public hearing date. Following consideration of the matter, the Hearing Examiner will then issue a decision. In response to Ms. Petersen's inquiry regarding the need for a public hearing on the moratorium in the Highlands, Councilwoman Briere explained that a moratorium extension is being considered as the appeal process could take a significant amount of time to resolve. Following discussion regarding the public meeting and public hearings scheduled for May 8th, Council President Corman confirmed the order in which they will be held as follows: first, the public meeting on overall development of the Highlands area, second, the public hearing on the Highlands moratorium extension, and third, the pubic hearing on the AHBL walkway vacation request. Citizen Comment: DeMastus - Sandel DeMastus, 1137 Harrington Ave. NE, Renton, 98056, commented that Highlands Community the Highlands Community Association is growing fast, and has over 250 Association members. She added that supporters of the association include Senator Margarita Prentice, and Representatives Zack Hudgins and Bob Hasegawa. ADJOURNMENT MOVED BY LAW, SECONDED BY NELSON, COUNCIL ADJOURN. CARRIED. Time: 8:29 p.m. Bonnie I. Walton, CMC, City Clerk Recorder: Michele Neumann April 24, 2006 RENTON CITY COUNCIL COMMITTEE MEETING CALENDAR ` Office of the City Clerk COUNCIL COMMITTEE MEETINGS SCHEDULED AT CITY COUNCIL MEETING April 24, 2006 COMMITTEE/CHAIRMAN DATE/TIME AGENDA COMMITTEE OF THE WHOLE MON., 5/01 CANCELLED (Corman) MON., 5/08 CANCELLED COMMUNITY SERVICES (Nelson) FINANCE MON., 5/08 Vouchers; (Persson) 4:30 p.m. Approval of Three Limited Term Employees in Planning/Building/Public Works Department; Year-End Fund Balance PLANNING&DEVELOPMENT THURS., 5/04 CANCELLED (Briere) PUBLIC SAFETY MON., 5/08 Transit Center Safety Concerns (Law) 6:00 p.m. TRANSPORTATION (AVIATION) THURS., 5/04 CANCELLED (Palmer) UTILITIES THURS., 5/04 CANCELLED (Clawson) NOTE: Committee of the Whole meetings are held in the Council Chambers unless otherwise noted. All other committee meetings are held in the Council Conference Room unless otherwise noted. C.) 0 CITY OF RENTON ♦ ♦ Mayor Kathy Keolker Proc1an'wttConi Whereas; on April 17, 1952, the Congress of the United States approved the Joint Resolution to provide for setting aside an appropriate date as a National Day of Prayer(Public Law 82-324; 66 Stat. 64); and Whereat; the history of our nation is indelibly marked with the role that prayer has played in the lives of individuals and the nation; and W hereat, historically our greatest leaders have turned to prayer in times of crisis and thanksgiving; and Whereas; the virtues of prayer reflect a common bond: hopes and aspirations, sorrows and fears, repentance and renewed resolve, thanks and joyful praise, and love; Whereas; our nation will celebrate the 55th anniversary of the National Day of Prayer on May 4, 2006; 44101, Whereas, the President of the United States, George W. Bush, has proclaimed May 4, 2006, to be the Day of Prayer in the United States; Whereas, the Governor of the state of Washington, Christine 0. Gregoire, has proclaimed May 4, 2006, to be the Day of Prayer in Washington State; Now, Therefore, I, Kathy Keolker, Mayor of the City of Renton, do hereby proclaim May 4, 2006,to be the Day afPrayor in the City of Renton, in keeping with the wishes of the Congress of the United States and the Governor of the state of Washington, and I encourage all citizens to join me in this special observance. In witness whereof, I have hereunto set my hand and caused the seal of the City of Renton to be affixed this 24th day of April, 2006. eea Arekt"-- Kathy Keolker ‘„aar, Mayor of the City of Renton, Washington 1055 South Grady Way-Renton,Washington 98055-(425)430-6500/FAX(425)430-6523 RENTON �. AHEAD OF THE CURVE ! This paper contains 50%recycled material,30%postconsumer U � CITY OF RENTON ♦ © I+ Mayor 'P,t, Kathy Keolker Proc2an'wito-iii Whereat, native plant species are an important part of the Washington State heritage, providing important aesthetic, economic, and ecological contributions that make our state a special place to live; and Whereat, Washington enjoys an amazing diversity of over 3,000 native plant species, from rain forest plants on the Olympic Penninsula to the desert species in Eastern Washington; and Whereat, preserving native plant ecosystems is critical for the protection of birds, fish, and other wildlife, as well as of our water quality; and Whereav; over 350 of our native plant species are listed as rare by the Washington State Natural Heritage Program; and Whereat; invasive species present a great threat to sustaining our native plant ecosystems and biodiversity; and Whereas; Governor Christine Gregiore has proclaimed the week of April 30 to May 6, 2006, Noir to be Native Plant Appreciation Week and, across the state,public and private groups are celebrating the beauty and value of native plants in both natural settings and gardens; Now, Therefore, I, Kathy Keolker, Mayor of the City of Renton, do hereby proclaim the week of April 30 to May 6,2006,to be Nc t v&i picuntApprechgrbovi. Week/ in the City of Renton, and I encourage all our citizens to learn more about our native plants and how to protect them, and to enjoy and appreciate the value and beauty of our native flora. In witness whereof, I have hereunto set my hand and caused the seal of the City of Renton to be affixed this 24th day of April, 2006. 4%A%' Kathy K,: ker Mayor of the City of Renton, Washington 1055 South Grady Way-Renton,Washington 98055-(425)430-6500/FAX(425)430-6523 RENTON AHEAD OF THE CURVE :.� This paper contains 50%recycled material,30%post consumer `SY ‘e‘NTO AKERS FARMS ANNEXATION PUBLIC HEARING COUNCIL CONSIDERATION OF PROPOSED ANNEXATION WITH R-8 ZONING April 24, 2006 The City has completed the environmental review for future zoning for the proposed 13.3-acre Akers Farms annexation, if Council decides to approve it. The Boundary Review Board completed its review and approved this annexation on February 28, 2006. The subject site is within the City's Potential Annexation Area and is designated Residential Single Family (RS) on the City's Comprehensive Plan Land Use Map. It is bordered by the City limits on its southern and western boundaries and lies generally between 140th Avenue SE, if extended, on the west and north by the City of Renton. Nelson Middle School is immediately to the west (108th Avenue SE, if extended) and Puget Power/BPA power line easements define its northern boundary. Major vehicular access is from Benson Road South and SE 168th Street. Tonight's public hearing is the second of at least two required public hearings on future zoning. This site currently has King County's R-8 zoning and there are five single-family detached Nome dwellings on it. The City's proposed zoning is R-8 (8 units per net acre) which is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan land use designation of Residential Single Family (RS). This zoning is somewhat less dense than that of County's R-8 zone. The latter can be bonused up to 12 units per gross acre, which is more than 50% denser than Renton's 8 units per net acre. Renton's R-8 zone only allows single-family detached dwellings whereas King County's R-8 zone also allows both single family detached as well as attached dwellings such as townhouses. Specifically, the Administration is recommending that Council support R-8 zoning for this annexation and adopt ordinances bringing the annexation into the City and rezoning to Renton's R-8 zone. The Administration is also recommending that Council present these ordinances for first reading on May 8, 2006. law Hearing Handout 4-24-06.doc\ _ „„sibani.m mat 1, wk. di to 11111112k 4 4 , 0 4* 111 mil Ift•- * .4b Nr .411 glow 1 • . 41/ .111", " A. *4w* 41' x) _ iliguiso - wa • . I I LP Voila Ilk 4•,- mit ma 1 ,,, ,.., gkiillaar* 4 drtiatill illi 1151 k ID, mIlk 'air AO 416_41* 0111111 AlkliPliallto ii passOKKOMMIMIllingliMihin m ii R111116 mim rounioniahl 0 • an "IT 6 — 4 laig 11111 111111 NM PIM ILA; IF 16 a kit 111 -II_ H ' NM IN ,,4. ., ...,, „, .:_,'1;) Milli 10 *47. 004 III 401 I ilk --E 111;41 Iiikikit, wit lir / ki S 2Pi) St 1111 ::: 111.1111111 MEM *41110 • iik • -.. , I 1 \ i ow II • IP IN - 0 0 11 - 012111111111111111 MI 01 10-. IN --' liCiallial a '--' E, rtein is 0 # • ei., A 1 wiS, • Ivy ,,uliwir , ..-7. milimui 7 f.-..-„--14 vis • 01+_ ,(tii wzill ,:-4:: mil."1"1 WA illiN A VAS orptirrui AO `111411111111 ti'• •••1.11.." ' ') NZ IIII ) 1 t'- 6, ._, „,,,g sla. 1. 1,----- p .linleu - q. t-75- # la Min ''.- MW= am 10 _Ix 1 - c-- TO • ‘.0 am • pownime (-- lk f is ,,.:=15„, .. . ,_ –.,‹ .. — • 2 • L. c---' . -c- ... , fF 1"--1 ir rdw • 1 , 1 – -.1- 1 . ----I .141 Proposed Akers Farms Annexation 0 600 I 200 Figure 1:Vicinity Map ii.......--...-,...-... 7200 4 .—t+ 1,,,orAni,tk .1,pszeni,Y.4.,,,sis,!.4z vra ecto,liavtal. . ,-- CIV Units '11' 'Irsir' ''''''"" i Proposed Annex.Area °Neld Hearing Handout 4-24-06.doc\ 4i 5't ‘_,-/;",a{( Akers Farms Annexation Public Hearing on Annexation & Future Zoning April 24, 2006 1 ., ;;Perkn0 52a.7 a.Current Annexations ;:.--;:A.r- ,L15.8 ac- ,/: _-‘7.-,‘„. "''- t ''' ,y ` �r !Aster Park ...�... .......�. ..�... 18.5 ac. , .Queritl: , p 1 244ac.r { ' /\ *1• t 1 i :,'.W � t�4 ? 5 wA= ;: ` Preserve r ,`s ; Our Plateau s"ti= 1474.5 ac. ^'t.! g 4, ,, „,,,..s.,- *may}egg,..'� x y?,s _ p,, 4 .d °";'''''1/4.0, "�k ryleitch.: W. .,/ ,fir •182ac.. i w yPG 1 € (. 'x `• Y �ood -rte J I I ' _ ° t �. ro�.� Addition 'e-17't t. . 60 54C, 1 a .� r kers a ',, t rt .> .N.47!° Falkt ; l. Anthones4 6144 ' '��:. ,.41- '' V ; ., 25.7 ac. , %;r; 1 . Background • Initially submitted in February 2005 • Public meeting with proponents in April 2005 • 60% Direct Petition submitted in May 2005 • First public hearing on zoning in August 2005 • Environmental review completed in Nov. 2005 • Boundary Review Board approval in Feb. 2006 • Second public hearing on zoning in April 2006 2 Existing Conditions PAA - Within Renton's Potential Annexation Area Location - East of Benson Road S and south of Puget Drive SE Size -± 14.02 acres, including abutting street ROW :« Uses - Five existing single-family dwellings on site t.- Boundaries - site abuts Renton on its western, northern and northeastern boundaries. It abuts SE 164th Street on the south Existing Conditions - Vicinity Located immediately east of Nelson Middle Nelson School Middle - Located east of Citychow boundary at 108th - Avenue SE, if extended .; g f<< , Proposed Akers Farms Annexation' o rr� , Vicinity Map ""°g'""""`"" ' . 3 Existing Conditions - Topography r P. Site generally slopes y ; ±" downward to the " - -..---- - ,---,,r_ -,,-,.„ _ , ' - :"..),',„ northeast from the SW - 'S . corner, at a ±3% slope } _ F Topography Map " '-J .7-772=--. -17:' '''H.--. :-H------,t •-i '"''a , r,: I x fir , st' x 4 i •- ri , 40/, s 4 ,;fir:; . •,may, ,', ..„ �� .r+s ' r.:'''''...—.... .. .... ^,.r.,,,...,- View looking east at site from corner of 108s'Avenue SE and SE 164th Street showing how site dips downward near its middle 4 r x..- s x � . +.• fid,`�� d �� - . ... ,.,.„ : .1/4 2 . ., .- . . .: ,, , ,, . ,....:,:-,.-.40100,„ , .. . „s,z..*e_ _ ., ,- ,ii p '- * .i.k * . . . 4,-, • p. . . . .. . , __....___, . * . 1,41,04. -. . . - i- �'- '--- .4 .. - ,,...-.. ‘,.., m....:,,--,,z . ..* — . - . - ..:. ,i-.., .....: -,... -2..... 4"Y.. ':4.;;;•:'*1:*,t'' Vt, iew of typical housing in annexation area fronting on SE 164's Street Existing Conditions - Environmental ■ Topography , — ±3%slope from south to � � . : northeast ■ Environmental constraints — Unclassified coal mine hazard area on northern portion of site ` Looking northeast at w,.:estern edge of site from Nelson Middle School showing slope to north 5 Existing Conditions - Public Services Fire T— — • District 40 r f Utilities • • Sewer provided by both Renton Wastewater Utility and Soos Creek Water&Sewer District Water provided by Soos Creek Water&Sewer District -► Schools • Renton School District • King County Comp Plan Designation and Current Zoning V• t� G c• ' r 41Y> a� K.C. Land Use Map - t Urban Residential,4-12du/ac �� _ �� `" a j ow K.C. Zoning - � �: � �� .� R-8 -Residential- 8 du/gr. ac " f_ [� .,'M E I 14 I MP County Zoning Map 6 Renton Comp Plan Designation and Proposed Zoning IllAve 1 - '• orplii,%\ t., :. �. Renton Comp Plan Land , ,_ � Use Map - Residential t- J * y Single Family -'tt , n..... ii. � LU LikelyRenton zoningillptai 011 4. --iffizwirmai - R-8 (8 du/net acre) '; "— "\Y"Illirl ILI 14 Am SITE :: Renton Comprehensive Plan Relevant Comprehensive Plan Annexation Policies • Policy LU-378. Encourage annexation of all territory within City's PM as shown on adopted land use map • Policy LU-386. Promote annexation for those who use City services or would impact City infrastructure Fiscal Impact Analysis General cost and revenue implications • Assumes potential of±76 single-family homes at full development based upon Renton's R-8 zoning • Assumes five existing homes will be replaced • Assumes average new dwelling assessed value of$375,000 Fiscal Impact Analysis as Proposed Estimated one-time Parks Acquisition and Development Cost of$30,721 attributable to this annexation. 8 Conclusion Generally consistent with City annexation policies Consistent with City policies for medium density single-family rezones and Comp Plan designation ri Approved by Boundary Review Board as being generally consistent with their objectives Potential catalyst for further redevelopment of area Projected revenue surplus at build-out Conclusion, continued No major service issues identified although Police and others note cumulative impact of recent annexations will eventually require additional staff vi Generally consistent with City's Business Plan Goals s Best interests and general welfare of City is served, particularly if it facilitates higher quality development near Nelson Middle School 9 Recommendation The Administration recommends that Council: • Support R-8 zoning for this annexation consistent with City's Comprehensive Plan, • Accept the Akers Farms Annexation, as approved by the Boundary Review Board, by adopting the annexation ordinance it previously authorized staff to prepare, • Concurrently rezone the annexation site by adopting R-8 zoning for its 12.99 acre non-street portion, and • Present the annexation and rezone ordinances for first reading on May 8, 2006 • • 10 Speute f da Ari REcEivEd 00-04 !APR 2 4 2006 fcY o ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT, r� Cary CouNcil U NEIGHBORHOODS, AND STRATEGIC: PLANNING DEPARTMENT MEMORANDUM DATE: April 19, 2006 TO: Randy Corman, Council President Members of the Renton i y Council VIA: Kathy Keolker,Mayoo FROM: Alex Pietsch A—vVe SUBJECT: 2006 Legislature Recap Please find the attached recap of the 2006 Legislature prepared by the City's State lobbyist, Doug Levy. This information will be presented in a special presentation at the City Council meeting Monday, April 24, 2006. Attachment cc: Administrators • h:\ednsp\councillissue papers-agenda bills-ctte reports\2006\2006 legislature recap.doc Recap for Renton Mayor& City Council 2006 Legislative Session in Review Doug Levy—4/4/06 In advance of the 2006 Session of the Washington State Legislature, key legislators cautioned that the short 60-day session would be a rather mundane one,with lawmakers averse to initiatives that would be risky or controversial or give off the impression that they were eyeing new tax measures in an election year. So much for those predictions. The 2006 Legislature will go down as a very intense session where lawmakers plowed major new policy ground. Legislators approved gay-rights legislation, a series of alternatives to the"WASL"test for K-12,a landmark compromise on medical malpractice, a significant unemployment insurance reform package,changes to the regional transportation laws impacting Central Puget Sound,and a new economic development tool that is called"LIFT"(Local Infrastructure Financing Tools)but in reality looks a lot like the Tax- Increment Financing(TIF)measures that had been turned away in recent years. For Renton,the session also yielded a major prize: a new financing tool for large annexations. Substitute Senate Bill 6686,sponsored by Senator Margarita Prentice(D-11t District),allows for a state sales tax credit of up to 0.2 percent for cities undertaking annexations of 10,000 people or more. The measure, which required a`heavy lift' not only to pass but to get signed into law, could bring the City up to$4.5 million per year. Elsewhere,Renton and other cities can look back on the 2006 Session as a positive one,based on the LIFT legislation, the regional transportation bill,a new local transportation funding option, and the virtual absence of any harmful bills that negatively impact local government. Following is a"bulletized"recap of the 2006 Session. Some of the positives—take-home items we worked for,or supported • A new financing tool for large annexations(SSB 6686). This could mean up to$4.5 million per year to help with annexations of West Hill and the Fairwood area-- recognizing the ball is still in the residents'court. Two cautionary notes: 1)Renton and other cities should be somewhat judicious in their use of this tool, based on some overall cost concerns we heard from the Governor's Office; 2)the Governor's Office secured our commitment to work on 2007 amendments to 6686 that might increase review and accountability of the law. • New Economic Development tools and funding—including the LIFT legislation, 2SHB 2673; $4 million for Governor's Strategic Economic Reserve Fund; and$992,000 for the Governor's Life Sciences Fund. We had hoped to have the South Lake Washington project included as a pilot project in the LIFT bill,but in the end only three border-county projects achieved pilot status. Renton does have an opportunity to compete for$2.5 million/year in infrastructure financing either with the South Lake Washington project, or some other development effort. • Regional transportation financing. The Legislature enacted Engrossed House Substitute Bill 2871,providing additional flexibility for the Regional Transportation Improvement District(RTID)to go to the ballot with a regional transportation financing proposal. For Renton,the key will be ensuring that ballot proposal includes at least$1 billion for Interstate 405 widening and improvements between the Maple Valley Highway interchange and Bellevue. It should be noted that ESHB 2871 also has"strings attached" that require the RTID and Sound Transit to go to the ballot together in 2007, with both the roads and transit proposals having to pass in order for either to be approved. Additionally, language in ESHB 2871 that requires the RTID to"assure" full funding for SR-520 seismic and corridor improvements likely will be another complicating factor. • A new local transportation funding option. Within the aforementioned ESHB 2871 is a provision that allows cities and others to form"Transportation Benefit Districts" beginning in December 2007. The TBDs,which require voter approval,would allow for new revenue sources(licensing fee, sales tax surcharge,district-wide LIDs)to finance local street improvements. Renton and other cities have been pursuing local road funding options for years—so the inclusion of the TBD mechanism is a major coup for us. • Budget Items of importance. The 2006 Supplemental Operating and Capital Budgets enacted by the Legislature include several items that are helpful for Renton and other cities. They include$851,000 for the law enforcement training academy; $2 million for emergency management grants;a$2.5 million grant program for innovative programs to control stormwater; and$150,000 to assist with`buildable lands' work by Suburban Cities,Bellevue, Seattle,and King County. • New funding for the Transportation Improvement Board is"codified." This came via Substitute Senate Bill 6839. The 6839 provision provides explicit protection for the$7 million per biennium in new TIB money that the Legislature envisioned as part of the 2005 Transportation Partnership Act. • HE 3266—State Route 169 designated a"Highway of Statewide Significance." The City supported this Maple Valley-promoted legislation. • ESSB 6428—A new recycling program for electronic products. Renton supported this legislative initiative to make Washington the first state in the nation to create a formalized recycling program for electronic products such as desktop and laptop computers,computer monitors,and televisions. The so-called"E-Waste"program will be financed by manufacturer-paid fees. • HB 3317—Felony treatment of repeat DUI offenders. Cities have for years supported legislation that would have treated third-time DUI offenses as felonies. 3317 does not go quite that far. The legislation is a compromise that makes a DUI a felony if the driver has offended more than four times in 10 years. Call this one a start—not an end-all/be-all. • SHE 1650—Electronic ticketing. The Washington Association of Sheriffs and Police Chiefs led the lobbying effort on this one,with Renton and numerous other cities in support. 1650 allows police and courts to transition to a more paperless system of issuing tickets and fines,hopefully saving data processing time and money. • Pension system legislation. On the 59th and final day of the 2006 Session, the Legislature enacted SHE 2688,which contains strong legislative intent language regarding the establishment of a state fund to assist local governments with LEOFF 1 medical expenses. The Legislature also passed ESSB 6896,which allows for a four-year smoothing out of rate increases to fund PERS 1 pension obligations—rather than have them"spike"all in one year. NOTE: Governor Gregoire vetoed Section 2 of SHB 2688, which contained the LEOFF 1 language sought by cities. She has, however, directed the Department of Retirement Systems(DRS)to work with cities and others on studying the LEOFF 1 medical funding needs. • Targeted tax incentives. The Legislature approved several targeted tax incentives supported by Renton. They include: 2SSB 6558 to put state matching money into film/TV production in our state; HB 2466 to provide excise tax relief for certain aerospace suppliers; and SHB 2640 to provide a new sales tax deferral for biotech manufacturing. Problem bills we headed off • A threat to our local authority and local ordinance regulating abandoned shopping carts. SHE 2813 got as far as the House Floor,but we teamed up with Auburn to stop it there. • Law Enforcement and courts. HB 2343 would have compromised juvenile interrogations in criminal cases; SB 5323 and SB 6877 changed the dollar thresholds for what property crimes are misdemeanor vs. felony—it would have resulted in more misdemeanors,creating new costs and caseloads for cities; and SB 5260 sought to redirect drug seizure monies from local law enforcement to drug treatment. One other note: The Legislature did a good job of inserting"within available resources"language to SHB 2407,which requires electronic home-monitoring and GPS tracking of sex offenders released into community custody. • Land-use arena. No problematic bills on eminent domain; SHE 2217,which put"no net loss of buildable lands"requirements on local governments and could have undermined city zoning authority, died in House Rules; SHB 2325,requiring that local governments take specific actions to subdivide large lots into irregular-shaped smaller ones,died in Senate; and HB 3140 to restrict authority of Boundary Review Boards to expand the size of annexation areas,did not get out of the House Local Government Committee. • Bills with fiscal implications that `died': SSB 6241 —a portion of supplemental transportation budget that would have shifted federal pass-through funds away from the PSRC; SHB 2845,precluding system development charges for residential fire- suppression sprinkler systems; SSB 6592/SHB 2777,legislation mandating additional sick-leave coverage for seasonal employees; SB 6138,restricting business licensing authority; and HB 2609,a new"volumetric"method of imposing utility tax that had negative fiscal impacts for local government. • Miscellaneous. Cities and other public agencies headed off HB 2024,a subcontractors' promoted bill which would have required jurisdictions to pass new"just cause" tests when rejecting all bids; SHB 1613,a bill making it more difficult to reject contractors' claims for work not done in a timely manner; and HB 2515, significantly weakening attorney-client privilege for sensitive public records. A few that got away from us....or,bills where cities have more work to do • A full-mitigation solution for Streamlined Sales Tax/sourcing(SSB 6594). We thought all the stars were aligned on this one. Cities, counties and the business community on the same page. A supportive Governor. A supportive Senate Ways&Means Chair(Senator Prentice)—and a Senate that passed SSB 6594 by a 48-0 vote! In the end,though, the House Speaker held this legislation,not due to substantive concerns but rather to political campaign and timing issues. We made great progress,though,and the key is to hold our full-mitigation solution and coalition in place until 2007—when Speaker Chopp has committed that SST legislation will be one of the first things on his list. • Capital Budget funding for Chastain Trail. It's probably an over-dramatization to say this one got away from us. We did not have much hope for line-item capital funding in a "supplemental"year,and are taking steps to position this project for 2007 funding. • SB 6815—limiting state/local agency liability for things such as offender supervision. • SHB 2641/SSB 5319—trapping of moles on parks properties,golf courses. The City worked hard on this one and strongly supported both 2641 and 5319,which came close to passage. Unfortunately,we are back into a "wait `til next year"mode. • Restricting where sex offenders can live—SSB 6325. Under this legislation,cities(other than Monroe and Issaquah, which are grandfathered)are pre-empted at least until 2008 from adopting local ordinances that restrict where"community custody"sex offenders may live. A statewide restriction,precluding such sex offenders from living within a two-block radius of any schools,remains in effect. AWC is to convene a stakeholder group to develop a consensus-approved"Model Policy"on sex-offender residency standards. 6325 represents a pre-emption of local control,but it is not clear at all that the residency restrictions(which do not prohibit where a sex offender works, and do not prohibit sex offenders from living a block outside a restriction area)provide genuine public safety. One other note: police and prosecutors should like SSB 6775,which allows police to evict sex offenders from public establishments that have been declared off-limits. Some areas where we need to follow up or where significant interim work lies ahead • SST will continue to be a major issue. We have work to do in holding together a coalition and a"full mitigation"piece of legislation • Capital funding for projects—Chastain Trail. I am recommending we do a warm-weather bout tour for key legislators and even have fiscal committee staff join us. • "RTID"and Sound Transit within the region. On the RTID side, I-405 and the 405/167 interchange are our`biggies,' while on the ST side, we need to do more work on promoting 405 BRT as a cost-effective project on the east side. ESHB 2871 also established a 9-member,citizen-based"Regional Transportation Commission"to review transit and transportation governance in the Central Puget Sound—we will need to closely track RTC meetings and late-2006 recommendations. • Local Infrastructure Financing Tools(LIFT)—2SHB 2673. We should work to promote the South Lake Washington project for new infrastructure financing assistance. • Annexation. We now have a new financing tool for large annexations, but a lot of local and city-county work lies ahead. • Shopping Carts. We fended off SHE 2813 in 2006,but the natural sympathy is for the grocery-store operators whose carts are stolen,not for governments that seek to regulate. Additionally,there are only two cities which regulate at this juncture. I believe it is important that we talk with grocery stores outside the legislative process and come to some terms,vs.the unpredictability of taking this issue back to Olympia. • Trapping of moles. I am recommending we do some checking into the idea of a rule- making that can help address our problem,vs. the idea of going back(again)to the well one more time on the legislative front. • Where dollars are available—ensuring we compete. Whether it is Emergency Management grants,money for innovative programs to control stormwater,or a new program to help fund projects that address rock slide/mudslide damage, we should ensure the City is pursuing state grant money that can help its cause. • There will be interim task forces that need our attention—whether the issue is sex offender residency,LEOFF 1 medical funding,etc. • The Legislature enacted amendments to a statute allowing for the creation of regional fire authorities(SHB 2345). Other South King County jurisdictions—Auburn,for example— may take a serious look at creating such authorities. I recommend the City keep close tabs on this one,to see what others do,and how it impacts fire service and costs. • Looking ahead to 2007. While the 2007 Session may seem light years away,it really isn't. We will want to keep a close eye on the AWC's 2007 legislative process,and begin meeting with Department Heads this fall to build a 2007 Legislative Agenda to take to Council. ti`SY O� ADMINISTRATIVE, JUDICIAL, AND A I, LEGAL SERVICES DEPARTMENT �- N� MEMORANDUM DATE: April 24, 2006 TO: Randy Corman, Council President Members of the Renton City Council FROM: Kathy Keolker, Mayor Jay Covington, Chief Administrative Officer SUBJECT: Administrative Report In addition to our day-to-day activities, the following items are worthy of note for this week: GENERAL INFORMATION • The King County Northwest Natural Yard Days program is underway through May 15th. King County, in partnership with local government agencies, cities, and local water providers, supports this program to encourage the use of environmentally preferable yard care products. During the promotion, natural yard care products are discounted up to 25 percent at 81 participating retailer locations. The program also provides information for residents on the benefits of natural yard care. For more information call the Natural Lawn and Garden Hotline at 206-633-0224 or visit www.yarddays.com. ADMINISTRATIVE/JUDICIAL/LEGAL SERVICES DEPARTMENT • The Mayor's Planting Day on Saturday, April 22nd, was a "tree-mendous" success, with over 60 volunteers planting trees and flowers in the downtown business district. The opening ceremony featured Mayor Kathy Keolker and Councilmember Toni Nelson, who inspired the student, teacher, parent, and youth volunteers, while sunny but cool conditions provided ideal planting weather for the 20 trees and numerous flower pots. COMMUNITY SERVICES DEPARTMENT • The 64-team Spring Softball program begins tonight and runs through early July. Numbers indicate this is the largest Spring league to date! • The Second Annual Community Garage Sale will be held at the Renton Community Center from 9:00 a.m. to 2:00 p.m. on Saturday, April 29th. Seventy-five vendors have registered for the event. Stop by and find that one-of-a-kind treasure you've been looking for. • The 2006 Summer"What's Happening"recreation brochure will be available beginning May 1st, with registration opening May 2nd for City of Renton residents, and May 4th for non-residents. • The Burnett Avenue South parking lot, located between South 4th and South 5th Streets,will undergo improvements beginning May 13th. The lot contains large trees that have lifted the asphalt and curbing and are annually attacked by a fungal leaf disease. The planned work includes removing ten London Plane trees, repairing isolated asphalt surfaces lifted by roots, replacing displaced curbing, sealcoating the asphalt, and re-striping the parking spaces. Immediately following completion of the work, hedge maple trees (a smaller species) will be planted in the islands. Parking lot repairs will occur during the week of May 15th, with sealcoating and final striping completed the first week in June. Local residents and businesses will be contacted this week about the project and its impact on parking. Administrative Report April 24,2006 Page 2 • The Renton Community Center hosted a 14-team ASA Softball Tournament on Saturday, April 22nd. The "Renton Invitational" tournament generated over 1,200 park visits. • A Model Horse Show was held at the Renton Community Center on Saturday, April 22nd,with over 500 people in attendance. audtct e 1!'lin V7T-Ov-42 Citizens First J'itt'2 P- - What the Highlands Community Association wants for the 1 neighborhood: * We believe the market has changed significantly regarding property values and regarding the type of housing that would work in the area. * Existing single family dwellings and duplexes should not become non 11 conforming. * Existing single family dwellings and duplexes which need upgrading should be upgraded. * Increase code enforcement via Nuisance Abatement Law to encourage property owners to "get going." * Those unwilling to upgrade should be encouraged to sell to someone who will make improvements. * Let the property owners develop to higher densities, if that is their wish. * Increase police patrols commensurate with population to further reduce crime and make the area safer. * Repair sidewalks where needed and build sidewalks where missing. * Require standard driveways; what was done at Sandel's property and her neighbors are great examples of how this small thing improves the neighborhood. * Landscape along the sidewalks. * Establish block watches to create a cohesive neighborhood. * Organize neighborhood work parties. * Explore the possibility of having a Subarea Covenant. This would really protect everyone's property, and if people understood, I think they would willingly sign on. * Review whether low interest loans from the City could be made to low income property owners for upgrading/remodeling (Ref your $2.6 mill) * Non profit groups can help individual low income property owners too. * Don't make that condominium that wants to fix up and paint their building non conforming; allow them to do what is needed to make their property better, this benefits the entire community. * There's lots of good ideas out there that upgrade the neighborhood without displacing the People; let's gather them and make a new plan. * But whatever ideas are decided upon, "the Plan" must not create an environmental where the actions of the City depress property values. The moratorium has done that for far too long. Never give up. Never, never, never give up. Prepared by: Inez Somerville Petersen, Secretary, HCA, 425-255-5543 A a' CITY OF RENTON COUNCIL AGENDA BILL � AI#: e , Submitting Data: For Agenda of: Dept/Div/Board.. AJLS/City Clerk April 24, 2006 Staff Contact Bonnie Walton Agenda Status Consent X Subject: Public Hearing.. Bid opening on 4/5/2006 for CAG-06-044, Correspondence.. New Park Construction at 233 Union Ave. NE Ordinance Resolution Old Business Exhibits: New Business Staff Recommendation Study Sessions Bid Tabulation Sheet(three bids) Information Recommended Action: Approvals: Legal Dept Council concur Finance Dept Other Fiscal Impact: Expenditure Required... $ 994,990.14 Transfer/Amendment Amount Budgeted Revenue Generated Total Project Budget $1,519,000.00 City Share Total Project.. SUMMARY OF ACTION: Engineers Estimate: $1,134,000(including Alternatives 1 through 5) In accordance with Council procedure,bids submitted at the subject bid opening met the following three criteria: There was more than one bid,the low bid was within the project budget, and there were no irregularities. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Accept the low bid submitted by Ohno Construction in the amount of$994,990.14 (including Alternatives 1 through 5). Y ti�,417Ra � COMMUNITY SERVICES DEPARTMENT • � MEMORANDUM DATE: April 19, 2006 TO: Bonnie Walton, Ci Clerk FROM: Terry Higashiyama, ommunity Services Administrator STAFF CONTACT: Leslie Betlachirks Director(ext. 6619) SUBJECT: Acceptance of Bid for New Park at 223 Union Ave. NE CAG 06-044 A bid opening was held Wednesday, April 5, 2006, for the New Park Construction at 233 Union Ave. NE. The scope of work for this project includes construction of a new park with restroom,picnic shelter, utilities, clearing and grading,paths, irrigation, and landscaping. The engineer's estimate was$1,134,000.00. A total of three bids were received, with Ohno Construction of Seattle, WA as the low bidder, submitting a bid of$994,990.14 (including Washington State Sales Tax). The project budget amount is $1,432,000.00 for Park Development and $87,000.00 for bulb- out design and construction of traffic calming items, for a total overall budget of `"o $1,519,000.00. Primary funding for this project comes from the Capital Improvement Plan fund(316.000000.020.5940.0076.62.020051), with an additional $87,000.00 coming from Traffic Safety(317.012115.016.5950.0000.67.000000). J. A. Brennan and Associates was contracted to provide professional design services for the project in the amount of$167,148.00 for park development, with an additional $9,000.00 for traffic calming items (Addendum#1)and another $2,950.00 for conditional use permits (Addendum#2)for a total of$179,098.00. With $21,318.00 of the overall budget allocated to Pace Engineers for site surveying and delineation of the wetlands, and$10,193.30 allocated for advertising, call for bids,permits and debris removal,there are $1,308,390.70 in remaining construction funds. We have conducted a reference check on Ohno Construction. References were provided by Seattle Public Utilities and D.A. Hogan&Associates. Both references confirmed all work was done well and according to specification. Our Architectural firm, J.A. Brennan and Associates, has also worked with Ohno Construction, and gives them a high recommendation. We are now requesting that Council award the bid to Ohno Construction for the amount of $994,990.14. H:\Kim\Bill\CIP\New Park 233 Union Ave NE\Bonnie Walton Memo New Park 41006.doc CITY OF RENTON BID TABULATION SHEET PROJECT: New Park at 233 Union Ave. NE and NE 3rd Ct.; CAG-06-044 DATE: April 5, 2006 FORMS BID BIDDER Bid Triple Includes 8.8%Sales Tax Bond Form Clements Bros., Inc. X X Base Bid: $837,774.47 PO Box 7964 Alt.#1 $24,567.04 Bonney Lake,WA 98391 Alt.#2 $48,165.76 Tim J.Clements Alt.#3 $11,929.92 Alt. #4 $100,090.56 Alt. #5 $11,568.70 Construct Co. X X Base Bid: $996,359.93 1621 Pease Ave. Alt.#1 $19,040.00 Sumner,WA 98390 Alt. #2 $51,897.60 Cy Morse Alt. #3 $10,880.00 Alt. #4 $20,672.00 Alt. #5 $10,553.60 Ohno Construction X X Base Bid: $849,075.20 9416 M.L. King Jr.Way S. Alt. #1 $18,198.98 Seattle, WA 98118 Alt. #2 $43,131.58 Yoshio Ohno Alt.#3 $14,734.78 Alt. #4 $60,928.00 Alt. #5 $8,921.60 Bid Received Past Deadline: X X Base Bid: $1,200,935.00 Precision Earthworks, Inc. Alt.#1 $24,372.00 14231 Lake Rd.,Suite 300 Alt. #2 $45,696.00 Lynnwood, WA 98087 Alt. #3 $21,760.00 Julie Schauss Alt. #4 $67,456.00 Alt. #5 $18,496.00 ENGINEER'S ESTIMATE TOTAL: Base Bid: $1,006,000.00 Alt.#1 $18,000.00 Alt.#2 $40,000.00 Alt.#3 $12,000.00 Alt.#4 $48,000.00 Alt.#5 $10,000.00 LEGEND: Forms:Triple Form:Non-Collusion Affidavit,Anti-Trust Claims,Minimum Wage CITY OF RENTON COUNCIL AGENDA BILL AI#: � Submitting Data: Community Services For Agenda of: Dept/Div/Board.. Facilities April 24, 2006 Staff Contact Greg Stroh(6614) Agenda Status Consent X Subject: Public Hearing.. Full Service Mechanical Maintenance Contract for Correspondence.. Renton City Hall Ordinance McKinstry Co. Resolution Old Business Exhibits: New Business Issue Paper Study Sessions Draft Copy of Contract Information Recommended Action: Approvals: Council concur Legal Dept X Finance Dept X Other Fiscal Impact: Expenditure Required... $63,509.00(annually) Transfer/Amendment Amount Budgeted $70,000.00 Revenue Generated Total Project Budget $70,000.00 City Share Total Project.. SUMMARY OF ACTION: The City advertised for Proposals for mechanical maintenance services at Renton City Hall. There were two(2)respondents. Through the selection process City staff determined that McKinstry Company was the most cost effective service provider. The contract is for three(3) years with a 30-day no cause termination clause. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Authorize the Mayor and City Clerk to enter into a full service agreement with the McKinstry Company to provide heating, ventilating and air conditioning systems services at Renton City Hall. Rentonnet/agnbilU bh <CY 0 0 'et COMMUNITY SERVICES DEPARTMENT a ems *taw a .1' ' . MEMORANDUM DATE: April 12, 2006 TO: Randy Corman, Council President Members of the Renton City Council VIA: -C., Kathy Keolker, M or FROM: Terry Higashiyam Community Services Administrator STAFF CONTACT: Greg Stroh, Facilities Manager(X6614) SUBJECT: Mechanical Maintenance Contract for Renton City Hall Issue Should the City enter into a full service agreement with the McKinstry Company to provide heating, ventilating, and air conditioning systems services at Renton City Hall? Recommendations Authorize the Mayor and City Clerk to enter into a full service agreement with the 440,00, McKinstry Company to provide heating, ventilating, and air conditioning systems services at Renton City Hall. Background: • In February 2006, the City advertised for Proposals for mechanical maintenance services at Renton City Hall. There were two (2)respondents. • Two (2)proposals were received on March 16, 2006, prior to the 5:00 PM deadline. The project estimate was set between $50,000.00 and$70,000.00 based on the previous 2003 RFP. The low proposal was $ 63,509.00 from McKinstry Co. The high proposal was $ 66,864.00 from Puget Sound Refrigeration, Inc. We have worked with both of these vendors before, each are well qualified and have provided competitive proposals. • McKinstry Co. has proven through their exemplary customer service, and overall efficiency in service delivery, that they are the ideal fit for this contract. Conclusion: Award the contract to the low bidder, McKinstry Co. Attachments C: Jay Covington,Chief Administrative Officer Mike Bailey,Finance/IS Administrator is\temp new pc\contract docs\rch mech maint\issue paper to council.doc 141ps .�`cl O .4NN0 CITY OF RENTON COMMUNITY SERVICES DEPARTMENT CONTRACT AGREEMENT THIS AGREEMENT is made as of the day of , 2006, between the CITY OF RENTON, a municipal corporation of the State of Washington, hereinafter referred to as "CITY" and McKinstry Co., hereinafter referred to as"CONTRACTOR", to provide Mechanical Maintenance Services for the Renton City Hall located at 1055 South Grady Way, Renton, Washington. The City and Contractor agree as set forth below. 1. Scope of Services. The Contractor will provide all material and labor necessary to perform all work described in the Proposal which is included with this Agreement as Attachment"A". 2. Changes in Scope of Services. The City, without invalidating the Contract, may order changes in the Services consisting of additions, deletions or modifications, the Contract Sum being adjusted accordingly. Such changes in the work shall be authorized by written Change Order signed by the City and the Contractor. 3. Time of Performance. The Contractor shall perform the Services as per the time schedule itemized in the Scope of Work. The quarterly services shall be performed within three (3) months from the execution of this agreement and every three (3) months thereafter. All of the Services shall be performed at mutually agreed upon times and days that reflect the operating hours and needs of the New City Hall. 4. Term Of Contract. The Term of this Agreement shall be for the period from April 1, 2006, and continuing three years to April 1, 2009. This Agreement may be extended for additional periods of time upon mutual written agreement of the City and the Contractor. 5. Contract Sum. In consideration of the Contractor performing the specified Services, the City agrees to pay the Contractor an amount not to exceed$15,877.25 per quarter or $63,509.00 per year. In the event the city desires additional Services other than those described in the Scope of Work, the Contractor agrees to perform such Services according to the attached Rate Schedule, Attachment"D"or for an amount negotiated by the Parties, whichever is less. 6. Method of Payment. Payment by the City for the Services will only be made after the Services have been performed and a voucher or invoice is submitted in the form specified by the City. Payment will be made thirty(30)days after receipt of such voucher or invoice. The City shall have the right to withhold payment to the Contractor for any work not completed in a satisfactory manner until such time as the Contractor modifies such work so that the same is satisfactory. 0 ip 7. Employment. The Contractor's employees are not employees of the Cityof Renton. 4.1A 8. Assignment and Subcontract. The Contractor shall not assign or subcontract any portion of this Contract without express written consent of the City of Renton. 9. Record Keeping and Reporting. The Contractor shall maintain accounts and records which properly reflect all direct and indirect costs expended and services provided in the performance of this Agreement. The Contractor agrees to provide access to any records required by the City. 10. Hold Harmless. The Contractor shall indemnify, defend and hold harmless the City, its officers, agents, employees and volunteers,from and against any and all claims, including claims from third parties, losses or liability, or any portion thereof, including attorneys fees and costs, arising from injury or death to persons, including injuries, sickness,disease or death to Contractor's own employees, or damage to property occasioned by a negligent act, omission or failure of the Contractor. 11. Insurance. The Contractor shall secure and maintain in force throughout the duration of the Contract Commercial General Liability insurance in the amount of$1,000,000;Auto Liability insurance in the amount of$1,000,000; Excess Liability insurance in the amount of $1,000,000; and Workers' Comp coverage. The City of Renton shall be named as an additional insured on the policy. A certificate of insurance evidencing the contractor's insurance coverage shall be delivered to the City before executing the Work on this Agreement. 12. Compliance with Laws. The Contractor and all of the Contractor's employees shall perform the services in accordance with all applicable federal, state,county and city laws, codes and ordinances. 13. Conflicts. In the event of any inconsistencies between contractor proposals and this contract, the City of Renton contract shall prevail. 14. Prevailing Wage Rates. By executing this Contact, the Contractor agrees to comply with the State prevailing wage requirements as set forth in the Contract Documents. Attachment A : Scope of Work Attachment B : City of Renton Insurance Requirements Attachment C : Contractor's Certificate of Insurance Attachment D : Contractor's Rate Schedule This Agreement is entered into as of the day and year written above. 'err • o4 CONTRACTOR CITY OF RENTON ' it`)► Signature Signature Kathy Keolker, Mayor Printed Name and Title Printed Name and Title McKinstry Co. Business Name Attest 5005—3rd Avenue South Bonnie I.Walton,City Clerk Mailing Address Printed Name and Title Seattle, WA 98134 City State Zip (206)832-8209 Telephone ATTACHMENT A SECTION 8-SCOPE OF WORK for the NEW CITY HALL The contractor will furnish all labor, materials and equipment to perform all general preventive and corrective maintenance for the HVAC Systems, including Direct Digital Controls, and the Domestic Cold and Hot Water Systems for the facility. The only exception will be warranty provided labor and materials. Mechanical Scope: The scope for a full service preventive maintenance contract includes the following: 1. Preventive Maintenance The preventive maintenance of the mechanical equipment involved with the HVAC systems and the domestic water system,which includes Hot water boilers, circulation pumps and Heat tape. HVAC system includes Air filter replacement every three months, inspection of Air Handlers, Condensers Evaporators, Heat Pumps,Air Compressors, Exhaust Fans and Unit Heaters. The contractor shall provide an equipment log on each piece of mechanical equipment to track when preventive maintenance is performed. See attached equipment list and floor print location of equipment. 2. Semi-Annual Maintenance Twice yearly maintenance inspections performed covering all mechanical equipment. See detailed scope No"r of work for specifics. 3. Emergency Service Provide for emergency calls and cover complete cost of all parts and labor. Response to emergency call should be within two hours of the call for service. 4. Equipment List See Equipment Schedules—Sections: 10& 12 5. Detailed Scope of Work ti MECHANICAL MAINTENANCE for the New City Hall 17 CITY OF RENTON COUNCIL AGENDA BILL Iiire AI#: /". ' C. • Submitting Data: Planning/Building/Public Works For Agenda of: April 24, 2006 Dept/Div/Board.. Development Services Division Staff Contact Carrie K. Olson x7235 Agenda Status Consent X Subject: Public Hearing.. Acceptance of additional right-of-way to comply with Correspondence.. Ordinance City of Renton code for new short plats and the Veldyke Resolution Short Plat,LUA05-065 Old Business Exhibits: New Business Deed of Dedication Study Sessions Exhibit Map Vicinity Map Information Hearing Examiner's Report &Decision Recommended Action: Approvals: Council concur Legal Dept X Finance Dept X Other Fiscal Impact: N/A Expenditure Required... Transfer/Amendment Amount Budgeted Revenue Generated Total Project Budget City Share Total Project. SUMMARY OF ACTION: The area to be dedicated is approx. 27,488 sq. ft. to be used for public right-of-way and emergency access. The additional right-of-way will include a new 42' wide by 387' long public street extending South from NE 19th St. and ending in a 50' radius cul-de-sac along the eastern boundary of the short plat that will be known as Redmond Court NE. The dedication is a requirement of the Hearing Examiner's decision for the Veldyke Short Plat, LUA05-065. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Accept the additional right-of-way and authorize the Mayor and City Clerk to sign and record the Deed of Dedication. C:\Documents and Settings\mpetersen\Local Settings\Temp\Veldyke SHPL 06m AGNBILL.doc Return Address: Ntr.r City Clerk's Office City of Renton 1055 South Grady Way Renton,WA 98055 DEED OF DEDICATION Property Tax Parcel Number:042305-9231 Project File II: LUA 06-065 Street Intersection: NE 19th Street Reference Namber(s)of Documents assigned or released:Additional reference membri are on page 2. Grantor(s): Grantee(s): 1. Veldyke Realty,Inc. 1. City of Renton,a Municipal Corporation LEGAL DESCRIPTION: (Abbreviated full legal on page 2) The east 155 feet of the southwest quarter of the northeast quarter of the southeast quarter of section 4,township 23 north, range 5 east,W.M.,in the City of Renton,King County,Washington. Except the east 22 feet of the west 75 feet of the north 228 feet thereof: Except the west 53 feet of the north 262 feet thereof; And except a portion of the north 15 feet thereof east of the west 75 feet SITUATE IN THE CITY OF RENTON,COUNTY OF KING,STATE OF WASHINGTON. The Grantor,for and in consideration of mutual benefits conveys,quit claims,dedicates and donates to the Grantee(s)as named above,the above described real estate situated in the County of King,State of Washington. IN WITNESS WHEREOF,I have hereunto set my hand and seal the day and year as written below. Nur' Approved and Accepted By: Grantor(s): Grantee(s): City of Renton (176 21///ilea 4C /(h722 Mayor l�L rye /-�ec)L alar City Clerk IN WITNESS WHEREOF,said Grantor has caused this instrument to be executed this day of /00/ 200/u . STATE OF WASHINGTON)ss �••\‘K�"11111� COUNTY OF KING ) ‘,. O�� I certify that I(grow or have satisfactory evidence that �1 lel/- ��; _` N� ti,�'y4`�' � rl I iilf- signed this' d acknowledged it :1y M 4p 1. to be his/her/their free and voluntary act for the uses and purposes mentioned in the ;lF = O y •4 ; instrument ///L/IGS !-4W 4 4� �2`U9.��' r Notary Pu c in and for r : State of Washington �t t pit t�F o W Ps; Notary(Print) Xi ' /I// tta_!/) -/f My appointor t ices: /2-/e//,f Dated: �/ ,C Page 1 FORM 04 0001/bb (EXHIBIT "A") vied BEGINNING ANG AT THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF THE NORTH 15 FEET OF THE SOUTHWEST QU ARIER OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 4, TOWNSHIP 23 NORTH, RANGE 5 EAST, W.M., KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON; THENCE SOUTH 0103'12` WEST, ALONG THE EAST UNE OF SND SUIBOMSION, A DISTANCE OF 483.97 FEET TO THE BEGINNING OF A CURVE TANGENT 70 SND LINE THENCE SOUTHERLY, SOUTHWESTERLY, WESTERLY, NORTHWESTERLY, NORTHERLY, NORTHEASTERLY AND EASTERLY A DISTANCE OF 224.19 FEET ALONG SAID CURVE HAVING A RADIUS OF 50.00 FEET AND A CENTRA. ANGLE OF 256'53'57 10 A POINT OF REVERSE CURVATURE THENCE EASTERLY, NORTHEASTERLY AND NORTHERLY A DISTANCE OF 33.55 FEET ALONG THE ARC OF SND CURVE CONCAVE TO THE NORTHWEST HAVING A RADIUS OF 25.00 FEET AND A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 7653'57'; THENCE NORTH 0103'12' EAST TANGENT 70 SAID CURVE A DISTANCE OF 386.74' FEET TO THE BEGINNING OF A CURVE TANGENT TO SAID LIVE; THENCE NORTHERLY A DISTANCE OF 38.96 FEET ALONG THE CURVE CONCAVE 7O THE SOUTHWEST, HAVING A RADIUS OF 25.00 FEET AND A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 89'17'49'; THENCE NORTH 88.14'37' WEST TANGENT TO SAID CURVE 13.31 FEET; THENCE NORTH 0103'12' EAST 15.00 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 88'14'3T EAST, ALONG THE SOUTH LAVE OF 7W NORTH 15 FEET OF SW SUSAN, A DISTANCE OF 80.01 FEET 10 THE POINT OF BEGINNING :4' '; :: (:(2 e4.4.4 0 -a. dli, • a OWEN B. HILLE, PLS `', 0440016�,: PLS NO. 40016 , LA1'� DPW o�/ /uo� JOB NO.:2005-007 DATE:4/3/2006 SHEET: 1 OF 2 ,ftillti { O w "-'-''''.----------------------.......,_____________________,,Z 0 0 ---- 1 _ O ,,,,�`, O I 41 V I' $ o. - 15.00' V �' 15' lx • �� \:41..a...'0:0,9, p• l1/312E3 .74' 44Tr..-6--:-/ ,• ��' P) • •7k. NSb1173Y2'1�r 483.97.----'o'----------------t--- 15 r'' ao C LN, LW. 7/4, N.E. 1/4, # --1Pltnc a ....r.nx: • 1 .70. '6'1' zi• sib 1 _ trz,,,..,c. ...O••�i s .m R m -I N O ►v )i �1J,. � ` �1 ' . r" at /! 11; _ ! , ./ .b 11 ',.. . . '.‘5401 ig :RUA 41 2 p wt r 7117,r1rrlrl L ` L1II7I�ITT'P , , +._CJI •- _ c.St,: 0 CZ C) 11 ira! çii " .. ,, arra•M•W•••rr•• '� G n V V V Lrirtuir ale • .1 11 is ta sit ‘4,,q, *... _ _ tit§ MI . ......M.1 111 g_0 >_ ,.., 0 at ui ! `6 :,,,,..4't't.i;. NE j. _. I*t SWU AI Cr UJ ii k 1 :1k 4 i k Ica ��( It 1 LS `�7 3- '12,,, .4ieMlli ;I c 1' ,-- . I- : ��■■r' !-N1 t6j47 !i1jL11211 1 =tai » ._ hl'1'1 ilati ; 11 9 . 0. r•r _ /4*.it ELI F '141. lirk ii ' tt!' �+� 17 .,,„,,till__ ,.•�. tw : .....:, „;., HinitlitiiinZtiitli. 111-1U ,..,,,,, a i.,-,, ,,- .. 1st:- . .1 a:Li :"-- ., . ill 9 ; .- I . ,, $ . so h 0 ; ni., 1------- 1 ....,44. 312,1 se, se, ifilms. • .1_..r. • ? • 1 SCO . • 9 i 40 itig ....)...,,,s,gzipraz, r �,. a ri:tir,v., ' EC; I I(C". Z .. ' I..A 1 . �,,, _ . it r August 18, 2005 OFFICE OF THE HEARING EXAMINER CITY OF RENTON Minutes OWNER/APPLICANT: Veldyke Realty, Inc. Cheryl Webber-Veldyke 550 Rainier Avenue S Seattle, WA 98118 CONTACT: Ale Kondelis Cramer NW, Inc. 945 N, Central #104 Kent, WA 98032 Veldyke Short Plat LUA 05-065, SHPL-H LOCATION: 3819 NE 19TH Street SUMMARY OF REQUEST: Hearing Examiner Short Plat approval for a seven (7) lot subdivision of a 1.87-acre site. SUMMARY OF ACTION: Development Services Recommendation: Approve subject to litorle conditions DEVELOPMENT SERVICES REPORT: The Development Services Report was received by the Examiner on July 12,2005. PUBLIC HEARING: After reviewing the Development Services Report, examining available information on file with the application, field checking the property and surrounding area; the Examiner conducted a public hearing on the subject as follows: MINUTES The following minutes are a summary of the July 19, 2005 hearing. The legal record is recorded on CD. The hearing opened on Tuesday, July 19, 2005, at 9:01 a.m. in the Council Chambers on the seventh floor of the Renton City Hall. Parties wishing to testify were affirmed by the Examiner. The following exhibits were entered into the record: Exhibit No. 1: Yellow file containing the original Exhibit No.2: Neighborhood Detail Map application, proof of posting, proof of publication and other documentation pertinent to this request. Exhibit No.3: Preliminary Short Plat Exhibit No. 4: Preliminary Grading&Tree Plan • Veldyke Short Plat File No.: LUA-05-065, SHPL-H August 18, 2005 Page 3 Ms. Weil asked that condition 5 be omitted from the staff report as the conceptual landscape plan has been submitted. The site is located within the boundaries of the Renton School District. The School District has indicated that they can accommodate the additional students. The site is located in the Honey Creek drainage basin. A detention vault is proposed to be located on Tract A in the southwest corner of the site. In order to reduce the potential erosion and sedimentation control to the site and adjacent properties the project must comply with the Department of Ecology's Manual for Erosion Control. Staff recommends the establishment of a maintenance agreement for all common improvements, st: rm drainage tract, any utility easements and landscaping. The property owner adjacent to the site, Paul Barfknecht, asked to have noted on record that his water meter and electrical lines may be impacted and need to be relocated due to the construction of the public right-of-way improvements for this proposed subdivision, and that that will be done not at his cost. Ale Anna Kondelis, Cramer NW, Inc., 945 N Central, Suite 104, Kent, WA 98032 stated that she represents Sherrie Webber Veldyke. Regarding Tract B, it is the intent of Veldyke Realty that they would maintain control and maintenance of that Tract, it would not go into the homeowner's association or have anything to do with their maintenance or interests. The property would be maintained by the Veldyke Realty until the time of its eventual development. The Examiner stated that that would mean Veldyke would be a remote property owner for a small tract of land that would have its own water meter, etc. What exactly do they have proposed for this tract? Ms. Kondelis stated she was not sure, but that whatever needed to be done to maintain the site would be taken care of. It will be irrigated and maintained. The homeowners will not have use of this tract. James Jaeger, Jaeger Engineering, 9419 S 204th Place, Kent, WA 98031 stated that he is the engineer for the applicant. Regarding Tract A, the reason for a 20-foot easement rather than making it part of Lot 5, on the preliminary drainage and utility plan, is because the detention vault goes right up to the easement line. If that was a lot line there would be a five-foot setback involved and the vault would have to be smaller. At the present it is at the minimum size to handle the seven lots. Secondly, if in the future the vault needs to be expanded to handle additional lots on the north end, it gives an area to be able to do that. The vaults are designed to handle traffic loads. The eastern radius curve on NE 19th has 15-feet of half right-of-way currently fronting this property, an additional 10 feet are going to be dedicated for a total of 25-feet so the proper curve radius can be installed. On the east side there is an existing 30-feet of right-of-way so there is plenty of room for an asphalt apron or whatever the City determines necessary to connect to the existing pavement eastbound. Jim Dalpay, PO Box 2436, Renton, WA 98059 stated that he has developed the property directly to the west of Tract A, and that there was no access to the rear of that property because of the steep ravine. He is in complete agreement with the present plat and will work with the developer in order to facilitate the detention system and pay a proportionate share. They would like a 26-foot easement for access. Cheryl Webber Veldyke, 5500 Rainier Avenue S, Seattle, WA 98118 stated that when she purchased this land she had several conversations with the Dalpay family and to this date there has been no negotiations as far as compensation for this easement. Mr. Jim Dalpay Jr. offered to sell one of his three lots, however if he was to Veldyke Short Plat File No.: LUA-05-065, SHPL-H August 18, 2005 Page 5 FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS& RECOMMENDATION Having reviewed the record in this matter,the Examiner now makes and enters the following: FINDINGS: 1. The applicant, Veldyke Realty, Inc., filed a request for an approval of a seven lot short plat together with two tracts. 2. The yellow file containing the staff report, the State Environmental Policy Act(SEPA) documentation and other pertinent materials was entered into the record as Exhibit#1. 3. The Environmental Review Committee(ERC), the City's responsible official determined that the proposal is exempt from environmental review. While there is a wetland on the subject site, it was found to be below the threshold to trigger Critical Areas review. 4. The subject proposal was reviewed by all departments with an interest in the matter. 5. The subject site is located at 3819 NE 19th Street. The site is located on the south side of NE 19th Street. The subject site is located two blocks west of Union Avenue NE and one block west of a segment of Shelton Avenue NE. 6. The map element of the Comprehensive Plan designates the area in which the subject site is located as suitable for the development of single-family uses, but does not mandate such development without consideration of other policies of the Plan. 7. The subject site is currently zoned R-8 (Single Family- 8 dwelling units/acre). 8. The subject site was annexed to the City with the adoption of Ordinance 4070 enacted in June 1987. 9. The subject site is approximately 1.87 acres or 81,457 square feet. The parcel is generally rectangular although it narrows in a stairstep fashion along its northwestern property line. The parcel is approximately 155 feet wide(south property line) by approximately 640 feet long(north to south). 10. An existing residence and outbuildings would be removed from the western side of the subject site if the plat is approved. 11. The site slopes gently to the south with slopes approaching approximately 10 percent at its steepest. 12. The applicant proposes preserving some trees located along the western edge of the parcel but most of the 50 trees located on the site would be removed. 13. The applicant proposes dividing the subject site into seven lots. The lots would generally be located west and south of a new cul-de-sac public road. The 42-foot wide road would begin at NE 19th Street and run south along the eastern edge of the site and end in a 50-foot radius cul-de-sac. At the northern end of the plat Tract B would be created. It would be approximately 38 feet wide and 247 feet long. Proposed Lots 1 to 4 would be located along the western edge of the property while Proposed Lots 5 to Niro' 7 would be located along the southern edge. Tract A would be a stormwater and access tract located • Veldyke Short Plat File No.: LUA-05-065, SHPL-H August 18, 2005 Page 7 3. While generally increasing the tax base, new development does create additional burdens on roads, parks and emergency services. State law requires that new development make provision for parks, roads and other urban services,therefore,the applicant will be required to make provision for those impacts by paying the appropriate fees. 4. The creation of Tract B as temporary open space should be clearly defined in the plat documents so that residents do not rely on it for local recreational needs. Also, staff should draft requirements for maintenance and monitor the state of this parcel since it could become an eyesore if it is not developed in a reasonable timeframe and owned by a remote party. 5. Since the access easement will serve both a property in this plat as well as in a separate existing plat, ownership and maintenance will require specific language assuring that the roadway is appropriately maintained. 6. The applicant will have to dedicate the new roadway. 7. In conclusion, the proposed short plat appears to provide a reasonable way to divide the existing larger acreage. DECISION: The proposed short plat is approved subject to the following conditions: 1. The applicant shall obtain a demolition permit and complete all inspections and approvals for all NiSe buildings located on the property prior to the recording of the final short plat. The satisfaction of this requirement is subject to the review and approval of the Development Services Project Manager. 2. The applicant shall record a restrictive covenant and have it noted on the face of the plat designating Tract B as open space and to remain undeveloped until such time as the abutting western property is available for consolidation for future development. The satisfaction of this requirement is subject to the review and approval of the Development Services Project Manager prior to recording of the short plat. 3. The applicant shall install a 6-foot high solid wood privacy fence along the east property line for the length of the new street. The satisfaction of this requirement is subject to the review and approval of the Development Services Project Manager. 4. The applicant shall pay the appropriate Transportation Mitigation Fee equal to $75.00 for each new daily trip associated with the project. Credit given for one existing residence. The Transportation Mitigation Fee shall be paid prior to the recording of the short plat. 5. The applicant shall pay the appropriate Fire Mitigation Fee equal to $488.00 per new single-family residence. Credit given for one existing residence. The Fire Mitigation Fee shall be paid prior to the recording of the short plat. 6. The applicant shall have a note placed on the face of the final short plat stating the fire code requires Lots 5, 6 and 7 to have sprinkler systems installed and maintained. The satisfaction of this requirement is subject to the review and approval of the Development Services Project Manager for review and approval prior to recording of the short plat. Veldyke Short Plat File No.: LUA-05-065, SHPL-H August 18,2005 Page 9 Jennifer Henning, Development Services Janet Conklin, Development Services Stacy Tucker, Development Services King County Journal Pursuant to Title IV, Chapter 8, Section 100Gof the City's Code, request for reconsideration must be filed in writing on or before 5:00 p.m., September 1,2005. Any aggrieved person feeling that the decision of the Examiner is ambiguous or based on erroneous procedure, errors of law or fact,error in judgment, or the discovery of new evidence which could not be reasonably available at the prior hearing may make a written request for a review by the Examiner within fourteen(14)days from the date of the Examiner's decision. This request shall set forth the specific ambiguities or errors discovered by such appellant, and the Examiner may, after review of the record, take further action as he deems proper. An appeal to the City Council is governed by Title IV, Chapter 8, Section 110, which requires that such appeal be filed with the City Clerk, accompanying a filing fee of$75.00 and meeting other specified requirements. Copies of this ordinance are available for inspection or purchase in the Finance Department, first floor of City Hall. An appeal must be filed in writing on or before 5:00 p.m., September 1,2005. If the Examiner's Recommendation or Decision contains the requirement for Restrictive Covenants, the executed Covenants will be required prior to approval by City Council or final processing of the file. You may contact this office for information on formatting covenants. The Appearance of Fairness Doctrine provides that no ex parte(private one-on-one)communications may occur concerning pending land use decisions. This means that parties to a land use decision may not communicate in private with any decision-maker concerning the proposal. Decision-makers in the land use process include both the Hearing Examiner and members of the City Council. All communications concerning the proposal must be made in public. This public communication permits all interested parties to know the contents of the communication and would allow them to openly rebut the evidence. Any violation of this doctrine would result in the invalidation of the request by the Court. The Doctrine applies not only to the initial public hearing but to all Requests for Reconsideration as v.'ell as Appeals to the City Council. . .,►•. • CITY OF Rte.)TON SHORT PLAT RECORDING NO. IOL/PAGE .,0� CITY OF RENTON SHORT PLAT NO. FOR .i?LD77 Z REALTY INC. SCALE: H t'-.1 440' KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON LOCATED IN THE Na 1/4 Or 7711 S.E. 1/4, OF SECTION 4, TOWNSHIP 23 NORTH, RANGE 6 VST. R.Y., 1 inch - 40 FT. KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON 40 o- 40 PORTION OF: N.E. 1/4, s.E. 1/4. SEC. 4. T. 23 NORTH. R. 5 CAST. W.M. LAND USE ACTION NUMBER: LAND RECORD NUMBS _ _ _ _ _ _ _ - - LUA—XX—XXX—SHPL LND-XX-XXXX . iii !! 1pputuIifflett2221pp p22121/iiiiEEEtLEEEEE1E!!Ei ElELtt22E 1 ` 'N. lemommoitt22IfraffittASISISIONY11186111111111ffigillitill ., I x g s3 4 g � �. g , S o § r • • # 1 « ems• • e a eaS ItB © VI R« a °* • r �kX-1 ' S# e 11 .a `+y b -4 ` �••;;` ;_,..' /� ... �;,.;a..,,:...• ,g# # «• moi., .. iI# 0 7 777 7•77.7,t7.7:77:,‘ •1 3yb�y� �+ # ( 0 q I 11 Yitltl D3 µ 1 i ji 0[r MM ✓:1 i ip: I.! 5 gl 41 1 :41) .....'ss n APTI;LIM MN................. L 1; - 1" .:"./:i riYal '1 f g li i --'-i• l - \ It...j a. ( a• n , c•ft, 11 ' : 0 X I• • ' \5 -• ` 1141 .1 — k ; ., a 4,.-\ : :if di \ \ \ • tjtIh1 ji I*4 :!'I 11 ,•;� N \ illikil % � � ' \ N.:- ' irR !vfI ! ! 1f4 • . . q -�HS 1 i r, g.. 1 2 A. Cramer Northwest Inc. � ® � qffh A. R t, THfr;, fIf11A1110R u!t&a000rl7ot.0•AIO/011 M.GN oq,-.�aa ` 1 •� i` 1 2 92 4Otrg Sun•yoh Plo�n•n t Enytn••� Apo HON nisinfr mime AmaooMr a IIA 1x-1Jo•aw yqq��f ., W HMTk 1z .M K I/1 1R A T.2)NMI A I pS1 a Y'd j1 U C . O Y V. f/f N. CORRAL. 3TC. VOA. KENT. WA ff032 ( !14%! S. e. a. R.��� (2AT)f82-ufo(Iwl) OIIAriM.1h >M Apr /2, 2005 2005.407 >,ttt It !!! I-(soo)2s„-otss(+.n free> ..0 • (253)S52-ass(T•a) CHECKED VD SCALE' SHEET: (-YAW •n)h/•m.n,w,.&•. w•/W11 4 6•M , k.... - 4/1 Cr 9 tit 1 CITY OF RENTON COUNCIL AGENDA BILL AI#: 7-01 Submitting Data: Transportation Systems For Agenda of: Dept/Div/Board.. Planning/Building/Public Works April 24, 2006 1111.01 Staff Contact Jason Fritzler, x 7243 Agenda Status Consent Subject: Public Hearing.. Rainier Avenue—S 4th Place to S 2nd Correspondence.. Hardie Avenue SW Transit/Multimodal Ordinance Design Contract with KPG Resolution Old Business Exhibits: New Business X Issue Paper Study Sessions Design Contract Information 2006-2011 TIP#7 and#8 Recommended Action: Approvals: Council Concur Legal Dept X Finance Dept Fiscal Impact: Expenditure Required $ 2,736,425 Transfer/Amendment.... Amount Budgeted $ 597,000 (2006-2011 TIP#7) Revenue Generated $14,900,000 $ 1,077,000(2006-2011 TIP#8) Total Project Budget $ 6,300,000(2006-2011 TIP#7) City Share Total Project.. $ 6,747,000 $15,337,000(2006-2011 TIP#8) SUMMARY OF ACTION: These projects will improve Hardie Avenue SW between SW Sunset Boulevard and Rainier Avenue S by widening the road to accommodate northbound and southbound Business Access Transit(BAT) lanes on Hardie Avenue SW; installing a transit-only traffic signal at Hardie Avenue SW and Rainier Avenue S; reconstructing segments of Rainier Avenue S (between S 2nd St to S 4th Pl) to increase pedestrian and vehicle circulation, control vehicular access, and improve pedestrian access to transit stops; and constructing an eastbound transit queue at the SW Sunset Blvd/Rainier Avenue S intersection. The project will also include engineering of curb/gutter/plantings, sidewalks, and rebuilding the BNSF Railroad Bridge crossing Hardie Avenue SW. There is currently$6,300,000 programmed in the 2006-2011 TIP for the Rainier Avenue—S 4th Place to S 2nd Project and$15,337,000 programmed for Hardie Avenue SW Transit/Multimodal Project. Our 2006 budget allowance is$597,000 and$1,077,000 respectively. The design contract with KPG is $2,736,425 and includes a$414,536 reserve fund. It is understood that the design contract will not be completed in 2006 and will carry over into the 2007 budget. These topics will be addressed now, and reflected in the Six-Year 2007-2012 TIP process. Additionally, the Notice to Proceed will not be issued to KPG until the interlocal agreement(authorizing the grant funding)between the City and Sound Transit has been executed. The intent here is to have this design contract ready as soon as the agreement is signed, such that we can get the Hardie Avenue Project progressing concurrently with the Rainier Avenue—S/SW 7th to 4th Place Project(see attached schedule). STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Authorize the Mayor and City Clerk to execute the design contract with KPG for the Rainier Avenue—S 4th Place to S 2nd (TIP#7) and the Hardie Avenue SW Transit/Multimodal Projects (TIP#8). C:\Documents and Settings\n tetersen\Local Settings\Temp\Agenda Bill KPG full design contract w PEH revisions 2.doc • S ti`cY 0 PLANNING/BUILDING/ ; , PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT Y'P�N�o� MEMORANDUM DATE: April 24, 2006 TO: Randy Corman, Council President Members of the Renton City Council VIA: Kathy Keolker, Mayor FROM: Gregg Zimmerman�Administrator STAFF CONTACT: Jason Fritzler, Transportation Design Project Manager(x7243) SUBJECT: Rainier Avenue—S 4th Place to S 2"d Hardie Avenue SW Transit/Multimodal Design Contract with KPG ISSUE: Should Council authorize the Mayor and City Clerk to execute the design contract with KPG for the Rainier Avenue— S 4th Place to S 2"d (TIP#7) and the Hardie Avenue SW TransitlMultimodal Projects (TIP#8)? RECOMMENDATION: Authorize the Mayor and City Clerk to execute the design contract with KPG for the Rainier Avenue— S 4th Place to S 2nd(TIP #7) and the Hardie Avenue SW Transit/Multimodal Projects (TIP#8). BACKGROUND: The City and Sound Transit are in the process of signing an interlocal agreement that would authorize the City to spend $14,900,000 on design and construction of transit- supportive improvements on Rainier Avenue—S 4th Place to S 2nd(TIP #7) and Hardie Avenue SW from Sunset Boulevard to Rainier Avenue South (TIP#8). With the expectation that this agreement will be fully executed in early May, the Transportation Department would like to contract with KPG such that we minimize delays in the planned schedule for design and construction. Although these projects have the same funding source, these projects are represented in our 2006-2011 TIP as separate projects since it is likely that they will be constructed at different phases. Randy Corman,Council President Members of the Renton City Council Page 2 of 2 April 24,2006 The project on Hardie Avenue SW from Sunset Boulevard to Rainier Avenue South consists of constructing north and southbound Business Access Transit (BAT) lanes and center medians, replacement and widening of the BNSF Railroad Bridge, and installation of a transit-only signal at the intersection of Hardie Avenue SW and Rainier Avenue South. This project also includes roadway reconstruction and general-purpose traffic and safety improvements. The second project on Rainier Avenue South from South 2nd Street to South 4th Place, consists of building circulation improvements, adding access control elements, reconstructing sidewalks, installing bus stop enhancements, and constructing an eastbound transit queue jumper at the South 3rd Street and Rainier Avenue South intersection with a Transit Signal Priority System. In 2005, the design team completed a preliminary design contract that allowed KPG to conduct a survey of the Hardie Avenue corridor and begin the public outreach process with the businesses along and near the project site. This proved to be beneficial in getting the state, Fred Meyer, and Bob Bridge on board with our plan on the new alignment. Other issues addressed at this phase were the coordination of design and construction with the Rainier Avenue S/SW 7th to S 4th P1 (TIP#11). Since the Hardie Avenue and Rainier Avenue projects both involve replacement of the railroad bridges along the same rail line, the design team decided that the replacement of these bridges should occur at the same time to save on construction costs. Both the Transportation Improvement Board(TIB) and Sound Transit are aware of this plan and agree that this is a reasonable construction sequence. The entire design and construction sequence is as follows: 1) Design of the Hardie Avenue, Rainier Avenue S/SW 7th to S 4th Pl, and Rainier Avenue S 4th P1 to S 2nd projects in 2006 and 2007; 2) Construct the railroad bridges over Rainier and Hardie under one contract in 2007; 3) Construct the Hardie Avenue roadway in 2008; and, 4) Construct the Rainier Avenue Roadway in 2009. The attached schedule gives a good overview of the design and construction sequence. Attachment: Figure 10-1,Proposed Project Schedule cc: Peter Hahn,Deputy Planning/Building/Public Works Administrator—Transportation Rich Perteet,Interim Transportation Design,Planning and Programming Supervisor Jason Fritzler,Transportation Design Project Manager Connie Brundage,Transportation Administrative Secretary H:\Division.s\Transpor.tat\DESIGN.ENGUASON\Projects\Hardie Avenue\City Correspondance\Issue Paper full design contract KPG.doc City of Renton Planning/Building/Public Works 30%Design Report Rainier Avenue/BNSF Improvements Activity RNP• Odg Early spry Pima10 kW. Non Our Sign 771076 A01969 Wdaii d FMA M JJ A a-0 ft 0 J F M',A-M'2,it A II O J I, A M J'J A a O N;O u E M A M I -A,At-0,p,o,4 f a A M.JJ:.A At O-6R?.th r Rainier Ave&Hardie Ave RR Bridges Finn Design 0)Reiner RR Brides 061JM 163 01MAR08• 29SEP06 T113 1200,000 ANWASSVMAIWAINVFInal resign of Reiner RR BHdga TIB 0200,000 NOTES: PEED Hardie RR Brats KPG 80 01MAR08 31MAY09 ST 176,000 INSISMPEE0 Hardie RR Brags 1. All Construction costs have a ST 573.000 20%contingency. PSEE Hardt RR Bndea 11PG 87 01JUN08 25SEP06 ST 0(50000 I2. The dollar amounts are preliminary araffii/WOMME Hardie RR BrWpa sT 1160000 and should W considered M,Bid,8 Awed RR Bodges 05 020CT06 29DEC0e r place holders. Idlfi. smirmitrAd,BIO,a Awl RR 81689.9 Construct Rawer RR Unripe 281 01JAN07 31 DEC07 TIB 14.800,000 r Construct Rainier RR 11409s TIB 1{,900,000 Construct Hardy RR Bridge 261 01,1A1407 31DEC07 8T 13,900,000 1 0onMru60 Hardie RR Bridge AT 03,800,000 Hardie Ave PEED Mardis Ave KPG 176 O/MAR00' 310CT08 ST 1800000 WillIWWINNSWWWWIL PEED Needle Ave ST$800,000 t PSBE Hard).Ave KPG 218 01NOVOB 31AUG07 ST 1800,000 MIDIMININISIMMOMISMISS P884 talk Me ST 1000,000 ROW Marcia Ave KPG 218 01NOV08 31AUG07 ST 12,500,000 V 41111114111111111111111111111 ROW Hoodk Ave ST 12,600,000 AO,Bid,A Awrd Hardie Ave 81 03SEP07 25NOV07 1 MISMill A0,BIAS Awa Walk Aw Construct Hale Ave 326 03DECA7 277E1309 ST 08,000,000 [ ST11 18,000,000 COMruel Hardie Ay*Ave PEED RunnAve K1M PG 176 DAR08• 31OCT08 ST 1600,000 ''PEED Rieder Ave 8T 1600,000 F Damen Rainier Ave DMJM �3 01MAR08 31,04007 TIB 5425,000 1 Feel Deaden Rainier Ave 116 1126,000 PSUE Rainier Ave KPG 21e 01NOV08 31A0007 ST 1100,000 1 a■■F SIMOMMIIIIIMOMMIMIMMOL PUS Reinert Ave ST$100,000 ROW Rainier Ave(TIB) DMJM 218 03SEP07 30JUN08 TUB $600,000 1 SUBWISWWWWWWIINSWIWIlk ROW ReW8Aw(tie) TIB 3800.000 ROW Rainier Ave(ST) KPG 216 03SEP07 30JUN00 ST 51200,000 IIIINISMODIWNIMMISSIONNik ROW Reines Ave NIT) ST$1,600,000 Ad,810,&Award Reiner Ave 86 01JU108 29SEP08 1 Ad,Ba,a Award 11.1861 Are Rainer Ave(TIB) 303 029E1309 31MAR10 TIB 12,100,000 1 Coneau8t Rabler Ave(T®) TIB 02,400,000 1 COMtn6t Ranee Ave(ST) 303 02FEBOO 31MAR10 ST 83,800,000 IIIIIIIIIIRNIIIIRIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIRRRleIIIIIIIIRIMrcoeetnnt Reiner Are Sr 13,800,000 I81.��.° 01.100O.naa tierce RAINIER AVENUE&HARDIE AVENUE IMPROVEMENTS Dem Revision Checked Approved A,n ova 8019,1001038 20.41408 Metal Fleeing DMJM Hams•KPG I °"".....SyMeme,Inc Figure 10-1 Proposed Project Schedule 1 DMJM Harris 36 February 7,2006 )_ Consu Itant/Address/Telephone Local Agency KPG, Inc. Standard Consultant 753 9th Avenue North Seattle,WA 98109 Agreement ®Architectural/Engineering Agreement 0 Personal Services Agreement 206-286-1640 Agreement Number Project Title And Work Description Rainier Ave/Hardie Ave Transit Improvement Project Federal Aid Number PE/ED PS&E ROW Agreement Type(Choose one) 0 Lump Sum Lump Sum Amount $ ®Cost Plus Fixed Fee DBE Participation Overhead Progress Payment Rate 160.61 % ❑Yes ®No Overhead Cost Method Federal ID Number or Social Security Number D Actual Cost 91-1477622 Do you require a 1099 for IRS? Completion Date ❑Actual Cost Not To Exceed % 0 Yes ®No December 31, 2008 ®Fixed Rate 30 % Fixed Fee $ Total Amount Authorized$ 2,321,889.00 '" ❑Specific Rates Of Pay ❑Negotiated Hourly Rate Management Reserve Fund$ 414,536.00 o Provisional Hourly Rate 2,736,425.00 Maximum Amount Payable$ 0 Cost Per Unit of Work Index of Exhibits Exhibit"A"-Scope of Work Exhibit"B"-DBE Participation Exhibit"C"-Electronic Exchange of Engineering and Other Data Exhibit"D"-Payment(by Agreement Type) Exhibit"E"-Consultant Fee Determination Exhibit"F"-Breakdown of Overhead Cost Exhibit"G"-Subcontract Work/Fee Determination Exhibit"H"—Title VI Assurances Exhibit"P_'-Payment Upon-Termination of Agreement-__------ Exhibit"J"—Alleged Consultant Design Error Procedures Exhibit"K"—Consultant Claim Procedures Exhibit"L"—Liability Insurance Increase Exhibit"M"—Certification Documents THIS AGREEMENT,made and entered into this day of between the Local Agency of Renton ,Washington,hereinafter called the"AGENCY", °vied and the above organization hereinafter called the"CONSULTANT". DOT Form 140-089 EF Page 1 of 8 Revised 6/05 WITNESSETH THAT: WHEREAS,the AGENCY desires to accomplish the above referenced project,and "erre WHEREAS,the AGENCY does not have sufficient staff to meet the required commitment and therefore deems it advisable and desirable to engage the assistance of a CONSULTANT to provide the necessary services for the PROJECT;and 'WHEREAS,the CONSULTANT represents that he/she is in compliance with the Washington State Statutes relating to professional registration,if applicable,and has signified a willingness to furnish Consulting services to the AGENCY, NOW THEREFORE,in consideration of the terms,conditions,covenants and performance contained herein,or attached and incorporated and made a part hereof,the parties hereto agree as follows: I General Description of Work The work under this AGREEMENT shall consist of the above described work and services as herein defined and necessary to accomplish the completed work for this PROJECT. The CONSULTANT shall furnish all services,labor,and related equipment necessary to conduct and complete the work as designated elsewhere in this AGREEMENT. II Scope of Work The Scope of Work and projected level of effort required for this PROJECT is detailed in Exhibit"A"attached hereto and by this reference made a part of this AGREEMENT. III General Requirements All aspects of coordination of the work of this AGREEMENT with outside agencies,groups,or individuals shall receive advance approval by the AGENCY.Necessary contacts and meetings with agencies,groups,and/or individuals shall be coordinated through the AGENCY.The CONSULTANT shall attend coordination,progress and presentation meetings with the AGENCY and/or such Federal,State,Community,City or County officials,groups or individuals as may be requested by the AGENCY.The AGENCY will provide the CONSULTANT sufficient notice prior to meetings requiring CONSULTANT participation.The minimum required hours or days notice shall be agreed to between the AGENCY and the CONSULTANT and shown in Exhibit"A." The CONSULTANT shall prepare a monthly progress report,in a form approved by the AGENCY,which will outline in written and graphical form the various phases and the order of performance of the work in sufficient detail so that the progress of the work can easily be evaluated. The CONSULTANT,and each SUBCONSULTANT,shall not discriminate on the basis of race,color,national origin,or sex in the performance of this contract. The CONSULTANT,and each SUBCONSULTANT,shall carry out applicable requirements of 49 CFR Part 26 in the award and administration of USDOT-assisted contracts.Failure by the CONSULTANT to carry out these requirements is a material breach of this AGREEMENT that may result in the termination of this AGREEMENT. Participation for Disadvantaged Business Enterprises(DBE),if required,per 49 CFR Part 26,or participation of Minority Business Enterprises(MBE),and Women Business Enterprises(WBE),shall be shown on the heading of this AGREEMENT. If D/M/WBE fines are utilized,the amounts authorized to each firm and their certification number will be shown on Exhibit "B"attached hereto and by this reference made a part of this AGREEMENT. If the Prime CONSULTANT is a DBE firm they must comply with the Commercial Useful Function(CUF)regulation outlined in the AGENCY'S"DBE Program Participation Plan". The mandatory DBE participation goals of the AGREEMENT are those established by the WSDOT'S Highway and Local Programs Project Development Engineer in consultation with the AGENCY. All Reports,PS&E materials,and other data furnished to the CONSULTANT by the AGENCY shall be returned.All electronic files,prepared by the CONSULTANT,must meet the requirements as outlined in Exhibit"C." All designs,drawings,specifications,documents,and other work products,including all electronic files,prepared by the CONSULTANT prior to completion or termination of this AGREEMENT are instruments of service for this PROJECT,and are the property of the AGENCY.Reuse by the AGENCY or by others,acting through or on behalf of the AGENCY of any 144.1,s such instruments of service,not occurring as a part of this PROJECT,shall be without liability or legal exposure to the CONSULTANT. Page 2 of 8 IV Time for Beginning and Completion The CONSULTANT shall not begin any work under the terms of this AGREEMENT until authorized in writing by the AGENCY. All work under this AGREEMENT shall be completed by the date shown in the heading of this AGREEMENT under completion date. The established completion time shall not be extended because of any delays attributable to the CONSULTANT,but may be extended by the AGENCY in the event of a delay attributable to the AGENCY,or because of unavoidable delays caused by an act of GOD or governmental actions or other conditions beyond the control of the CONSULTANT.A prior supplemental agreement issued by the AGENCY is required to extend the established completion time. V Payment Provisions The CONSULTANT shall be paid by the AGENCY for completed work and services rendered under this AGREEMENT as provided in Exhibit"D"attached hereto,and by reference made part of this AGREEMENT. Such payment shall be full compensation for work performed or services rendered and for all labor,materials,supplies,equipment,and incidentals necessary to complete the work. The CONSULTANT shall conform to all applicable portions of 48 CFR Part 31. A post audit may be performed on this AGREEMENT.The need for a post audit will be determined by the State Auditor, WSDOT External Audit Office and/or at the request of the AGENCY'S PROJECT Manager. VI Sub-Contracting The AGENCY permits sub-contracts for those items of work as shown in Exhibit"G"attached hereto and by this reference made part of this AGREEMENT. Compensation for this sub-consultant work shall be based on the cost factors shown on Exhibit"G." The work of the sub-consultant shall not exceed its maximum amount payable unless a prior written approval has been issued by the AGENCY. All reimbursable direct labor,overhead,direct non-salary costs and fixed fee costs for the sub-consultant shall be substantiated in the same manner as outlined in Section V.All sub-contracts shall contain all applicable provisions of this AGREEMENT. With respect to sub-consultant payment,the CONSULTANT shall comply with all applicable sections of the Prompt Payment laws as set forth in RCW 39.04.250 and RCW 39.76.011. The CONSULTANT shall not sub-contract for the performance of any work under this AGREEMENT without prior written permission of the AGENCY.No permission for sub-contracting shall create,between the AGENCY and sub-contractor,any contract or any other relationship.A DBE certified sub-consultant is required to perform a minimum amount of their sub-contracted agreement that is established by the WSDOT Highways and Local Programs Project Development Engineer in consultation with the AGENCY. VII Employment The CONSULTANT warrants that they have not employed or retained any company or person,other than a bona fide employee working solely for the CONSULTANT,to solicit or secure this contract,and that it has not paid or agreed to pay any company or person,other than a bona fide employee working solely for the CONSULTANT,any fee,commission, percentage,brokerage fee,gift,or any other consideration,contingent upon or resulting from the award or making of this - - -------------- contract For breach or violation of-this warrant,the AGENCY Shall have the right to annul this AGREEMENT without liability or,in its discretion,to deduct from the AGREEMENT price or consideration or otherwise recover the full amount of such fee,commission,percentage,brokerage fee,gift,or contingent fee. Any and all employees of the CONSULTANT or other persons while engaged in the performance of any work or services required of the CONSULTANT under this AGREEMENT,shall be considered employees of the CONSULTANT only and not of the AGENCY,and any and all claims that may arise under any Workmen's Compensation Act on behalf of said employees or other persons while so engaged,and any and all claims made by a Ne' Page 3 of 8 third party as a consequence of any act or omission on the part of the CONSULTANT'S employees or other persons while so engaged on any of the work or services provided to be rendered herein,shall be the sole obligation and responsibility of the CONSULTANT. r✓ The CONSULTANT shall not engage,on a full-or part-time basis,or other basis,during the period of the contract,any professional or technical personnel who are,or have been,at any time during the period of the contract,in the employ of the United States Department of Transportation,or the STATE,or the AGENCY,except regularly retired employees,without written consent of the public employer of such person. VIII Nondiscrimination During the performance of this contract,the CONSULTANT,for itself,its assignees,and successors in interest agrees to comply with the following laws and regulations: Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 (42 USC Chapter 21 Subchapter V Section 2000d through 2000d-4a) Federal-aid Highway Act of 1973 (23 USC Chapter 3 Section 324) Rehabilitation Act of 1973 (29 USC Chapter 16 Subchapter V Section 794) Age Discrimination Act of 1975 (42 USC Chapter 76 Section 6101 et seq.) Civil Rights Restoration Act of 1987 (Public Law 100-259) American with Disabilities Act of 1990 (42 USC Chapter 126 Section 12101 et.seq.) 49 CFR Part 21 23 CFR Part 200 RCW 49.60.180 In relation to Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964,the CONSULTANT is bound by the provisions of Exhibit"H" attached hereto and by this reference made part of this AGREEMENT,and shall include the attached Exhibit"H"in every sub-contract,including procurement of materials and leases of equipment,unless exempt by the Regulations or directives issued pursuant thereto. IX Termination of Agreement The right is reserved by the AGENCY to terminate this AGREEMENT at any time upon ten(10)days written notice to the CONSULTANT. In the event this AGREEMENT is terminated by the AGENCY other than for default on the part of the CONSULTANT,a final payment shall be made to the CONSULTANT as shown in Exhibit"I"for the type of AGREEMENT used. No payment shall be made for any work completed after ten(10)days following receipt by the CONSULTANT of the Notice to Terminate.If the accumulated payment made to the CONSULTANT prior to Notice of Termination exceeds the total amount that would be due when computed as set forth herein above,then no final payment shall be due and the CONSULTANT shall immediately reimburse the AGENCY for any excess paid. If the services of the CONSULTANT are terminated by the AGENCY for default on the part of the CONSULTANT,the above formula for payment shall not apply. Page 4 of 8 In such an event,the amount to be paid shall be determined by the AGENCY with consideration given to the actual costs incurred by the CONSULTANT in performing the work to the date of termination,the amount of work originally required which was satisfactorily completed to date of termination,whether that work is in a form or a type which is usable to the AGENCY at the time of termination,the cost to the AGENCY of employing another firm to complete the work required and the time which may be required to do so,and other factors which affect the value to the AGENCY of the work performed at the time of termination_ Under no circumstances shall payment made under this subsection exceed the amount,which would have been made using the formula set forth above. If it is determined for any reason that the CONSULTANT was not in default or that the CONSULTANT'S failure to perform is without the CONSULTANT'S or it's employee's default or negligence,the termination shall be deemed to be a termination for the convenience of the AGENCY.In such an event,the CONSULTANT would be reimbursed for actual costs in accordance with the termination for other than default clauses listed previously. In the event of the death of any member,partner or officer of the CONSULTANT or any of its supervisory personnel assigned to the PROJECT,or dissolution of the partnership,termination of the corporation,or disaffiliation of the principally involved employee,the surviving members of the CONSULTANT hereby agree to complete the work under the terms of this AGREEMENT,if requested to do so by the AGENCY.This subsection shall not be a bar to renegotiation of the AGREEMENT between the surviving members of the CONSULTANT and the AGENCY,if the AGENCY so chooses. In the event of the death of any of the parties listed in the previous paragraph,should the surviving members of the CONSULTANT,with the AGENCY'S concurrence,desire to terminate this AGREEMENT,payment shall be made as set forth in the second paragraph of this section. Payment for any part of the work by the AGENCY shall not constitute a waiver by the AGENCY of any remedies of any type it may have against the CONSULTANT for any breach of this AGREEMENT by the CONSULTANT,or for failure of the CONSULTANT to perform work required of it by the AGENCY.Forbearance of any rights under the AGREEMENT will not constitute waiver of entitlement to exercise those rights with respect to any future act or omission by the CONSULTANT. X Changes of Work The CONSULTANT shall make such changes and revisions in the complete work of this AGREEMENT as necessary to correct errors appearing therein,when required to do so by the AGENCY,without additional compensation thereof. Should the AGENCY find it desirable for its own purposes to have previously satisfactorily completed work or parts thereof changed or revised,the CONSULTANT shall make such revisions as directed by the AGENCY.This work shall be considered as Extra Work and will be paid for as herein provided under Section XIV. XI Disputes Any dispute concerning questions of fact in connection with the work not disposed of by AGREEMENT between the CONSULTANT and the AGENCY shall be referred for determination to the Director of Public Works or AGENCY Engineer,whose decision in the matter shall be final and binding on the parties of this AGREEMENT;provided,however, that if an action is brought challenging the Director of Public Works or AGENCY Engineer's decision,that decision shall be subject to de novo judicial review.If the parties to this AGREEMENT mutually agree,disputes concerning alleged design errors will be conducted under the procedures found in Exhibit"J",and disputes concerning claims will be conducted under the procedures found in Exhibit"K". XII Venue,Applicable Law, and Personal Jurisdiction Intheevent that either deems-it-necess to institute--le al-action-or proceedings to enforceanyright or obligation- under bli atior�--- -- - --- P� az3` g P g Y � g - under this AGREEMENT,the parties hereto agree that any such action shall be initiated in the Superior court of the State of Washington,situated in the county in which the AGENCY is located.The parties hereto agree that all questions shall be resolved by application of Washington law and that the parties to such action shall have the right of appeal from such decisions of the Superior court in accordance with the laws of the State of Washington.The CONSULTANT hereby consents to the personal jurisdiction of the Superior court of the State of Washington,situated in the county in which the AGENCY is located. Page 5 of 8 } XIII Legal Relations The CONSULTANT shall comply with all Federal,State,and local laws and ordinances applicable to the work to be done under this AGREEMENT. This contract shall be interpreted and construed in accordance with the laws of the State of Washington. The CONSULTANT shall indemnify and hold the AGENCY and the STATE and its officers and employees harmless from and shall process and defend at its own expense all claims,demands,or suits at law or equity arising in whole or in part from the CONSULTANT'S negligence or breach of any of its obligations under this AGREEMENT;provided that nothing herein shall require a CONSULTANT to indemnify the AGENCY or the STATE against and hold harmless the AGENCY or the STATE from claims,demands or suits based solely upon the conduct of the AGENCY or the STATE,their agents, officers and employees;and provided further that if the claims or suits are caused by or result from the concurrent negligence of(a)the CONSULTANT'S agents or employees,and(b)the AGENCY or the STATE,their agents,officers and employees,this indemnity provision with respect to(1)claims or suits based upon such negligence(2)the costs to the AGENCY or the STATE of defending such claims and suits shall be valid and enforceable only to the extent of the CONSULTANT'S negligence or the negligence of the CONSULTANT'S agents or employees. The CONSULTANT'S relation to the AGENCY shall be at all times as an independent contractor. The CONSULTANT shall comply with all applicable sections of the applicable Ethics laws,including RCW 42.23,which is the Code of Ethics for regulating contract interest by municipal officers.The CONSULTANT specifically assumes potential liability for actions brought by the CONSULTANT'S own employees against the AGENCY and,solely for the purpose of this indemnification and defense,the CONSULTANT specifically waives any immunity under the state industrial insurance law,Title 51 RCW. Unless otherwise specified in the AGREEMENT,the AGENCY shall be responsible for administration of construction contracts,if any,on the PROJECT. Subject to the processing of a new sole source,or an acceptable supplemental agreement,the CONSULTANT shall provide On-Call assistance to the AGENCY during contract administration.By providing such assistance,the CONSULTANT shall assume no responsibility for:proper construction techniques,job site safety,or any construction contractor's failure to perform its work in accordance with the contract documents. The CONSULTANT shall obtain and keep in force during the terms of the AGREEMENT,or as otherwise required,the following insurance with companies or through sources approved by the State Insurance Commissioner pursuant to Title 48 RCW. Insurance Coverage A. Worker's compensation and employer's liability insurance as required by the STATE. B.Commercial general liability and property damage insurance in an aggregate amount not less than two million dollars($2,000,000)for bodily injury,including death and property damage.The per occurrence amount shall not exceed one million dollars($1,000,000). C. Vehicle liability insurance for any automobile used in an amount not less than a one million dollar($1,000,000) combined single limit. Excepting the Worker's Compensation Insurance and any Professional Liability Insurance secured by the CONSULTANT, the AGENCY will be named on all policies as an additional insured. The CONSULTANT shall furnish the AGENCY with verification of insurance and endorsements required by the AGREEMENT.The AGENCY reserves the right to require complete,certified copies of all required insurance policies at any time. —All insurance shall be obtained from an insurance company authorized to do business in-the State of Washington.-The CONSULTANT shall submit a verification of insurance as outlined above within fourteen(14)days of the execution of this AGREEMENT to the AGENCY. No cancellation of the foregoing policies shall be effective without thirty(30)days prior notice to the AGENCY. • The CONSULTANT'S professional liability to the AGENCY shall be limited to the amount payable under this AGREEMENT or one million($1,000,000)dollars,whichever is the greater,unless modified by Exhibit"L".In no case shall the CONSULTANT'S professional liability to third parties be limited in any way. Page 6 of 8 The AGENCY will pay no progress payments under Section V until the CONSULTANT has fully complied with this section. This remedy is not exclusive;and the AGENCY and the STATE may take such other action as is available to it under other provisions of this AGREEMENT,or otherwise in law. XIV Extra Work A.The AGENCY may at any time,by written order,make changes within the general scope of the AGREEMENT in the services to be performed. B.If any such change causes an increase or decrease in the estimated cost of,or the time required for,performance of any part of the work under this AGREEMENT,whether or not changed by the order,or otherwise affects any other terms and conditions of the AGREEMENT,the AGENCY shall make an equitable adjustment in the(1)maximum amount payable;(2)delivery or completion schedule,or both;and(3)other affected terms and shall modify the AGREEMENT accordingly. C. The CONSULTANT must submit any"request for equitable adjustment",hereafter referred to as"CLAIM",under this clause within thirty(30)days from the date of receipt of the written order.However,if the AGENCY decides that the facts justify it,the AGENCY may receive and act upon a CLAIM submitted before final payment of the AGREEMENT. D.Failure to agree to any adjustment shall be a dispute under the Disputes clause.However,nothing in this clause shall excuse the CONSULTANT from proceeding with the AGREEMENT as changed. E.Notwithstanding the terms and conditions of paragraphs(A)and(B)above,the maximum amount payable for this AGREEMENT,shall not be increased or considered to be increased except by specific written supplement to this AGREEMENT. XV Endorsement of Plans If applicable,the CONSULTANT shall place their endorsement on all plans,estimates,or any other engineering data furnished by them. XVI Federal and State Review The Federal Highway Administration and the Washington State Department of Transportation shall have the right to participate in the review or examination of the work in progress. XVII Certification of the Consultant and the Agency Attached hereto as Exhibit"M-1(a and b)"are the Certifications of the CONSULTANT and the AGENCY,Exhibit"M-2" Certification Regarding Debarment,Suspension and Other Responsibility Matters-Primary Covered Transactions,Exhibit "M-3"Certification Regarding the Restrictions of the Use of Federal Funds for Lobbying and Exhibit"M-4"Certificate of Current Cost or Pricing Data.Exhibit"M-3"is required only in AGREEMENTS over$100,000 and Exhibit"M-4"is required only in AGREEMENTS over$500,000. XVIII Complete Agreement This document and referenced attachments contain all covenants,stipulations,and provisions agreed upon by the parties. No agent,or representative of either party has authority to make,and the parties shall not be bound by or be liable for,any statement,representation,promise or agreement not set forth herein.No changes,amendments,or modifications of the terms hereof shall be valid unless reduced to writing and signed by the parties as an amendment to this AGREEMENT. XIX Execution and Acceptance This AGREEMENT may be simultaneously-executed m sever=al counterparts,each of Which shall he deemed to be an original having identical legal effect. The CONSULTANT does hereby ratify and adopt all statements,representations, warranties,covenants,and agreements contained in the proposal,and the supporting material submitted by the CONSULTANT,and does hereby accept the AGREEMENT and agrees to all of the terms and conditions thereof. Page 7 of 8 In witness whereof,the parties here o have executed this AGREEMENT as of the day and year shown in the "Execution Date" •.x 0‘,..-y o • )of this AGREEMENT. / By . By CoIt. ` - C Agency City of Renton Notaiv DOT Form 140-089 EF Revised 6/05 Page 8 of 8 EXHIBIT A-1 CITY OF RENTON RAINIER AVENUE TRANSIT IMPROVEMENT PROJECT DESCRIPTION The City of Renton plans to improve Rainier Avenue between S4th Place and S 2' Street with the following improvements: • Install new curb,gutter and 8'wide sidewalks with a landscaped 4' minimum planter strip • Install new decorative traffic signals at the S 4th Place/Rainier Avenue,S 3rd Street/Rainier Avenue, S 3rd Place/Rainier Avenue and S 4th Place/Rainier Avenue intersections • Modify storm drainage,water and sewer systems as necessary to accommodate the proposed roadway improvements • Add an east bound transit queue jump lane at the S 3rd Street intersection • Restrict left turns between street intersections with the installation of curbing and landscaped medians • Resurface Rainier Avenue within the project limits • Install a new lighting system comprised of decorative pedestrian and traffic poles • Modify franchise utilities as necessary to accommodate the proposed roadway improvements ,4120, • Provide landscaped and irrigated planters and center medians,where possible • Install street furniture along the corridor • Install decorative bus shelters at stop locations • Include decorative paving treatments of intersections and other locations where appropriate The goal of this project will be to develop a more pedestrian friendly urban designed signature street along Rainier Avenue to promote more connectivity,better identity, and create a vibrant downtown retail district. Because of the Sound Transit funding requirements, the project scope,hour and fee estimate will be divided into 2 phases. Phase 1 will be Preliminary Engineering/Environmental Documentation (PE/ED)and Phase 2 will be Final Plans, Specifications and Estimate (PS&E)/Right-of-Way. EXHIBIT A-1 Noire RAINIER AVENUE PRELIMINARY ENGINEERING/ENVIRONMENTAL DOCUMENTATION SCOPE OF WORK Task 1.0-Management/Coordination/Administration 1.1 The Consultant shall provide continuous project management and administration to complete the PE/ED phase of work(estimate 12 months) 1.2 Prepare and update a detailed project schedule 1.3 Provide monthly progress reports 1.4 Coordinate with City Staff as required(estimate 24 meetings) 1.5 Prepare for and attend Project Team Meetings(estimate 24 meetings) 1.6 Provide QA/QC Reviews of all submittals(estimate 2 major submittals) Task 2.0 -Prepare Base Maps 2.1 The Consultant shall prepare topographic base maps to show all topographic features including utilities for the project corridor 2.2 The Consultant shall field verify base maps for accuracy Now Task 3.0-WSDOT Coordination 3.1 The Consultant shall prepare for and attend coordination meetings with WSDOT (estimate 4 meetings) 3.2 The Consultant shall prepare channelization plans for WSDOT approval Task 4.0-Sound Transit Coordination 4.1 The Consultant shall attend coordination meetings with Sound Transit to review progress and secure final design and right of way funding approval, (estimate 12 meetings) Task 5.0-Community Involvement 5.1 The Consultant, in cooperation with the City,shall prepare for and attend one (1)area wide Community Meeting 5.2 The Consultant shall prepare for one (1) City Council presentation 5.3 The Consultant, in cooperation with the City shall meet one-on-one with adjacent "%we property owners and business owners along the project corridor(estimate 20 meetings) 5.4 The Consultant shall assist the City in preparing one(1)newsletter for mailing by the City. EXHIBIT A-1 Task 6.0-Traffic Analysis Noird 6.1 The Consultant shall coordinate a refined traffic analysis to determine adequate turning lane pocket length, at the intersections Task 7.0-Geotechnical Analysis 7.1 The Consultant shall coordinate a geotechnical exploration to develop adequate paving sections, foundation requirements for retaining walls and signal poles and provide information on water table and erosion mitigations Task 8.0-Utility Coordination 8.1 The Consultant shall coordinate with the City to determine the extent of water and sewer facility work 8.2 The Consultant shall meet with all franchise utilities in the project corridor to determine the extent of any utility work, (estimate 8 meetings) 8.3 The Consultant shall prepare a Surface Water Technical Information Report that identifies drainage basins, outfall locations,design input data, alternatives considered, preliminary system layout including detention and water quality facilities(if required) with cost estimates Task 9.0-Environmental Documentation 9.1 The Consultant shall coordinate all environmental documentation required for the project,which includes the following: • SEPA Checklist • Cultural Resources Assessment • Hazardous Materials Technical Memo Task 10.0-Urban Amenities 10.1 The Consultant shall conduct a site analysis of the corridor to develop an amenities package that includes landscape treatments, architectural treatments to retaining walls, -railings, lightAig,nat poles,sidewalk finishes, transit shelters and street furniture Task 11.0-Roadway Design 11.1 The Consultant shall prepare 30%plans for the proposed improvements. Plans shall include: Noir • Roadway alignment • Curb, gutter and sidewalk layout • Retaining wall locations EXHIBIT A-1 • Slope grading limits No.r • Roadway widening limits • Drainage Iayout • Water/Sewer facility layout • Franchise Utility improvements/relocations • Channelization Plans • Signal Layout Plans • Illumination Layout Plans • Proposed roadway profile • Typical sections and necessary details • Urban design treatments • Preliminary planting plans 11.2 The Consultant shall field review the project corridor to understand and mitigate the impacts of all proposed improvements 11.3 The Consultant shall develop cost estimates for the 30%design Task 12.0-Prepare Design Report 12.1 The Consultant shall compile all the data prepared in tasks 1.0 through 11.0, Now supplement as necessary with text and graphics and bind in a Design Report formatted per WSDOT Standards. Task 13.0-Grant Funding Assistance 13.1 The Consultant shall assist the City in securing additional Grant Funding for the proposed improvements. Grant funds to be considered include the TPP and AIP programs with the Transportation Improvement Board. Task 14.0-Right of Way Plans 14.1 The Consultant shall identify easement and right-of-way needs for the proposed improvements 14.2 The Consultant shall prepare preliminary right-of-way plans based on assessor map infornmation and-the proposect improvements 14.3 The Consultant shall prepare cost estimates for purchase of all right-of-way p EXHIBIT A-1 RAINER AVENUE PREPARATION OF FINAL PLANS,SPECIFICATIONS AND ESTIMATES Nood RIGHT OF WAY SCOPE OF WORK Task 1.0-Management/Coordination/Administration 1.1 The Consultant shall provide continuous project management and administration to complete the PS&E phase of work(estimate 14 months) 1.2 Prepare and update a detailed project schedule 1.3 Provide monthly progress reports 1.4 Coordinate with City Staff as required(estimate 28 meetings) 1.5 Prepare for and attend Project Team meetings(estimate 28 meetings) 1.6 Provide QA/QC Reviews of all submittals(estimate 3 major submittals) Task 2.0-Survey Field Staking 2.1 The Consultant shall field stake and profile all wall locations 2.2 The Consultant shall field stake back of sidewalk on 50'centers throughout the project corridor Task 3.0-WSDOT Coordination 3.1 The Consultant shall prepare for and attend coordination meetings with WSDOT 3.2 The Consultant shall prepare plans and specifications for submittal to WSDOT to secure signal permits and construction permits Task 4.0- Sound Transit Coordination 4.1 The Consultant shall attend coordination meetings with Sound Transit to review progress and secure construction funding approval(estimate 14 meetings) Task 5.0- Community Involvement 5.1 The Consultant;in cooperation with the City shallprepare-for and attend one(7)area - wide community meeting 5.2 The Consultant shall prepare for one(1) City Council Presentation 5.3 The Consultant shall assist the City in preparing one(1)newsletter for mailing by the City '.rrr� EXHIBIT A-1 Task 6.0-Utility Coordination err 6.1 The Consultant shall coordinate with the City Water and Sewer Departments in developing the final plans (estimate 2 meetings each) 6.2 The Consultant shall coordinate franchise utility relocations,adjustments and facility additions in developing the final plans(estimate 4 meetings) Task 7.0-Roadway Design 7.1 The Consultant shall prepare final plans for the proposed improvements including the following: • Plans shall be prepared in such detail as to permit field layout and construction within a degree of accuracy acceptable to the City and in accordance with industry standards • Typical sections and details shall be provided, except for items available as standard details from the City,State or APWA drawings • The plans shall show complete detail of construction of the proposed improvement including: o Limits of construction and removals o Paving limits o Curb and sidewalk layout o Storm drainage layout o Utility adjustments o Water/Sewer system work o Retaining wall o Surfacing depths and details o Channelization and signing o Landscape planting and details o Irrigation layout and details o Property Restoration o Illumination Layout and wiring o Signal layout and wiring EXHIBIT A-1 The estimated Sheet Count is as follows: Title Number Cover Sheet 1 Sheet Index, Legend and Abbreviations 1 Summary of Quantities 3 Typical Sections 2 Details 3 Drainage Details 2 Water/Sewer Plans 7 Water/Sewer Details 2 TESC Notes 1 TESC Plans 7 Site Preparation Plans 7 Construction Staging Plans 7 Plans 7 Profiles 7 Intersection Plans 4 Island Details 3 • Wall Elevations&Details 2 Driveway Plans, Profiles and Details 4 Landscape Plans 7 Landscape Details 1 Urban Design Details 6 Urban Design Plans 7 Private Property Restoration Plans 7 Irrigation Plans 7 Irrigation Details 2 Illumination Plans 7 Illumination Details 2 Signal Plans(Rainier Ave&4`h Place) 4 Signal Plans(Rainier Ave&3rd Place) 4 Signal Plans(Rainier Ave&3`d Street) 4 Signal Plans(Rainier Ave&2nd Street) 4 Signal Details 3 Channelization and Signing Plans 7 Total. 142 EXHIBIT A-1 Deliverable with each Submittal to the City shall be: fir.++ 50%Review Submittal 1 QA/QC Checklist 1 Construction Cost/Right-of-Way Cost Estimate 15 Sets Plans(11x17 Size) 90%Review Submittal 1 QA/QC Checklist 1 Construction Cost/Right-of-Way Cost Estimate 15 Sets Plans(11x17 Size) 15 Sets Specifications 100%Review Submittal 1 QA/QC Checklist 1 Construction Cost/Right-of-Way Cost Estimate 15 Sets Plans(11x17 Size) 15 Sets Specifications Bid Documents Now 1 Engineer's Estimate 50 Sets Plans(11x17 size) 10 Sets Plans(22x34 size) 50 sets Specifications 1 set Reproducible Mylars Electronic Drawings and Specifications 7.2 The Consultant shall prepare Specifications and submit for review at the 90%and 100%documents stage and submit final Specifications with the Bid Documents. 7.3 The Consultant shall calculate quantities and prepare construction cost estimates along with each submittal and with the Bid Documents. 7.4 The Consultant shall field review the project corridor to ensure the plans are showing an accurate representation EXHIBIT A-1 Task 8.0-Right-of-Way Negotiations vorii 8.1 The Consultant shall prepare final right-of-way plans showing all the necessary right-of- way ightof- way and easements to construct the improvements 8.2 The Consultant shall prepare legal descriptions for all necessary rights-of-way and easements(assumes 27 parcels) 8.3 The Consultant shall coordinate the appraisal, negotiation and acquisition process all in accordance with the LAG Manual(assumes 27 parcels) 8.4 The Consultant shall prepare exhibits,diagrams and displays to support property owner negotiations EXHIBIT A-1 CITY OF RENTON °es" HARDIE AVENUE TRANSIT IMPROVEMENT PROJECT ESCRIPTION The City of Renton plans to improve Hardie Avenue between Rainier Avenue and Sunset Boulevard with the following improvements: • Widen Hardie Avenue to include 1 new Business Access Transit(BAT) lane in each direction • Install new curb,gutter and 6'sidewalk with a landscaped 4'wide planter strip. • Lower the roadway profile to allow for 16'vertical clearance at the BNSF Railroad Bridge. • Construct a new BNSF Railroad Bridge to accommodate the new roadway section. • Re-align Hardie Avenue to intersect Sunset Boulevard approximately 300'west of the existing intersection. • Widen Sunset Boulevard(SR-900)between the existing Hardie intersection and proposed Hardie intersection to include an extra left turn lane and extra eastbound lane. • Resurface Hardie Avenue and Sunset Boulevard within the project limits • Add curb,gutter, 4' planter strip and 6'sidewalks to Sunset Boulevard. • Install new traffic signals at the Rainier/Hardie, 7`h/Hardie and Sunset/Hardie intersections. • Install a new storm drainage system with detention and water quality treatment • Install a new lighting system full length • Modify existing City and franchise utilities as necessary to accommodate the proposed roadway improvements. • Provide landscaped and irrigated planters and center medians,where possible 41rrr.r. EXHIBIT A-1 HARDIE AVENUE PRELIMINARY ENGINEERING/ENVIRONMENTAL DOCUMENTATION SCOPE OF WORK Task 1.0 -Management/Coordination/Administration 1.1 The Consultant shall provide continuous project management and administration to complete the PE/ED phase of work(estimate 8 months) 1.2 Prepare and update a detailed project schedule 1.3 Provide monthly progress reports 1.4 Coordinate with City Staff as required(estimate 16 meetings) 1.5 Prepare for and attend Project Team Meetings(estimate 16 meetings) 1.6 Provide QA/QC Reviews of all submittals(estimate 2 major submittals) Task 2.0-Supplement Base Maps 2.1 The Consultant shall supplement project topographic base maps to include added areas in the Sunset Boulevard vicinity. 2.2 The Consultant shall field verify base maps for accuracy Task 3.0-WSDOT Coordination NIS 3.1 The Consultant shall prepare for and attend coordination meetings for work proposed within State right-of-way at Rainier Avenue and at Sunset Boulevard(estimate 4 meetings) 3.2 The Consultant shall prepare channelization plans for WSDOT approval at the Rainier Avenue intersection and along Sunset Boulevard. Task 4.0 - Sound Transit Coordination 4.1 The Consultant shall attend coordination meetings with Sound Transit to review progress and secure final design and right of way funding approval, (estimate 8 meetings) TaskS:0= -ommunity evolvement 5.1 The Consultant, in cooperation with the City,shall prepare for and attend one(1)area wide Community Meeting 5.2 The Consultant shall prepare for one (1)City Council presentation 5.3 The Consultant, in cooperation with the City shall meet one-on-one with adjacent ,w ied property owners and business owners along the project corridor(estimate 20 meetings) EXHIBIT A-1 5.4 The Consultant shall assist the City in preparing one(1)newsletter for mailing by the '`✓ City. Task 6.0-Traffic Analysis 6.1 The Consultant shall coordinate a refined traffic analysis to determine adequate turning lane pocket length, at the intersections 6.2 The Consultant shall analyze traffic flows during construction and partial closure of Rainier Avenue to determine detour needs on Hardie Avenue Task 7.0-Geotechnical Analysis 7.1 The Consultant shall coordinate a geotechnical exploration to develop adequate paving sections, foundation requirements for retaining walls and signal poles and provide information on water table and erosion mitigations Task 8.0-Utility Coordination 8.1 The Consultant shall coordinate with the City to determine the extent of water and sewer facility work Nari,. 8.2 The Consultant shall meet with all franchise utilities in the project corridor to determine the extent of any utility work(estimated 8 months) 8.3 The Consultant shall prepare a Surface Water Technical Information Report that identifies drainage basins, outfall locations, design input data, alternatives considered, preliminary system layout including detention and water quality facilities with cost estimates Task 9.0-Environmental Documentation 9.1 The Consultant shall coordinate all environmental documentation required for the project,which includes the following: • SEPA Checklist • Cultural Resources Assessment • Hazardous Materials Technical Memo EXHIBIT A-1 Task 10.0-Urban Amenities 10.1 The Consultant shall conduct a site analysis of the corridor to develop an amenities package that includes landscape treatments, architectural treatments to retaining walls, railing, light poles,sidewalk finishes, and street furniture Task 11.0-Roadway Design 11.1 The Consultant shall prepare 30%plans for the proposed improvements. Plans shall include: • Roadway alignment • Curb, gutter and sidewalk layout • Retaining wall locations • Slope grading limits • Roadway widening limits • Drainage layout • Water/Sewer facility layout • Franchise Utility improvements/relocations • Channelization Plans • Signal Layout Plans • Illumination Layout Plans ftird • Proposed roadway profile • Typical sections and necessary details • Urban design treatments • Preliminary planting plans 11.2 The Consultant shall field review the project corridor to understand and mitigate the impacts of all proposed improvements 11.3 The Consultant shall develop cost estimates for the 30%design Task 12.0-Prepare Design Report 12.1 The Consultant shall compile all the data prepared in tasks 1.0 through 11.0, supplement as necessary with text and graphics and bind in a Design Report —- formattedper WSDOT Standards. Task 13.0 - Right of Way Plans 13.1 The Consultant shall identify easement and right-of-way needs for the proposed improvements Nosil EXHIBIT A-1 13.2 The Consultant shall prepare preliminary right-of-way plans based on assessor map information and the proposed improvements 13.3 The Consultant shall prepare cost estimates for purchase of all right-of-way EXHIBIT A-1 HARDIE AVENUE PREPARATION OF FINAL PLANS, SPECIFICATIONS AND ESTIMATES Nord SCOPE OF WORK Task 1.0-Management/Coordination/Administration 1.1 The Consultant shall provide continuous project management and administration to complete the PS&E phase of work(estimate 10 months) 1.2 Prepare and update a detailed project schedule 1.3 Provide monthly progress reports 1.4 Coordinate with City Staff as required(estimate 20 meetings) 1.5 Prepare for and attend Project Team meetings(estimate 20 meetings) 1.6 Provide QA/QC Reviews of all submittals (estimate 3 major submittals) Task 2.0-Survey Field Staking 2.1 The Consultant shall field stake and profile all wall locations 2.2 The Consultant shall field stake back of sidewalk on 50'centers throughout the project corridor Task 3.0 -WSDOT Coordination 3.1 The Consultant shall prepare for and attend coordination meetings for work within State right-of-way at Rainier Avenue and at Sunset Boulevard(estimate 2 meetings) 3.2 The Consultant shall prepare plans and specifications for submittal to WSDOT to secure signal permits and construction permits Task 4.0 -Sound Transit Coordination 4.1 The Consultant shall attend coordination meetings with Sound Transit to review progress and secure construction funding approval(estimate 10 meetings) Task 5.0-Community Involvement ------------ 1- The Consultant in cooperation with the Ci shall-prepare- for and attend one(I)area— - P t}' wide community meeting 5.2 The Consultant shall prepare for one (1) City Council Presentation 5.3 The Consultant shall assist the City in preparing one(1) newsletter for mailing by the City • EXHIBIT A-1 'game Task 6.0-Utility Coordination 6.1 The Consultant shall coordinate with the City Water and Sewer Departments in developing the final plans(estimate 2 meetings each) 6.2 The Consultant shall coordinate franchise utility relocations, adjustments and facility additions in developing the final plans(estimate 4 meetings) Task 7.0- Roadway Design 7.1 The Consultant shall prepare final plans for the proposed improvements including the following: • Plans shall be prepared in such detail as to permit field layout and construction within a degree of accuracy acceptable to the City and in accordance with industry standards • Typical sections and details shall be provided, except for items available as standard details from the City, State or APWA drawings • The plans shall show complete detail of construction of the proposed improvement including: o Limits of construction and removals o Paving limits o Curb and sidewalk layout o Storm drainage layout o Utility adjustments o Water/Sewer system work o Retaining wall o Surfacing depths and details o Channelization and signing o Landscape planting and details o Irrigation layout and details o Property Restoration o Illumination Layout and wiring o Signal layout and wiring The estimated Sheet Count is as follows: Title -- --- -- - - ------Number------------------- Cover Sheet 1 Sheet Index, Legend and Abbreviations 1 Summary of Quantities 4 Typical Sections 2 Details 4 EXHIBIT A-1 Drainage Details 4 Water/Sewer Plans 9 Water/Sewer Details 2 TESC Notes 1 TESC Plans 9 Site Preparation Plans 9 Construction Staging Plans 9 Plans 9 Profiles 9 Intersection Plans 4 Island Details 4 Wall Elevations&.Details 12 Driveway Plans, Profiles and Details 4 Landscape Plans 9 Landscape Details 1 Urban Design Plans 9 Private Property Restoration Plans 9 Irrigation Plans 9 Irrigation Details 2 Illumination Plans 9 Illumination Details 2 Signal Plans(Hardie Ave SW&Rainier Ave) 4 Signal Plans (Hardie Ave SW(St.SW 7t'Street) 4 Signal Plans(Hardie Ave SW&SW Sunset Blvd) 4 Signal Plans(SW Sunset Blvd&Fred Meyer Driveway) 4 Signal Details 3 Channelization and Signing Plans 9 Total " E -Deliverable with each Suhmittalto the City shall be: 60%Review Submittal 1 QA/QC Checklist 1 Construction Cost/Right-of-Way Cost Estimate 15 Sets Plans(11x17 Size) EXHIBIT A-1 90%Review Submittal err 1 QA/QC Checklist 1 Construction Cost/Right-of-Way Cost Estimate 15 Sets Plans(11x17 Size) 15 Sets Specifications 100%Review Submittal 1 QA/QC Checklist 1 Construction Cost/Right-of-Way Cost Estimate 15 Sets Plans(11x17 Size) 15 Sets Specifications Bid Documents 1 Engineer's Estimate 50 Sets Plans(11x17 size) 10 Sets Plans(22x34 size) 50 sets Specifications 1 set Reproducible Mylars Electronic Drawings and Specifications vow 7.2 The Consultant shall prepare Specifications and submit for review at the 90%and 100%documents stage and submit final Specifications with the Bid Documents. 7.3 The Consultant shall calculate quantities and prepare construction cost estimates along with each submittal and with the Bid Documents. 7.4 The Consultant shall field review the project corridor to ensure the plans are showing an accurate representation of the proposed improvements Task 8.0— Right-of-Way Negotiations 8.1 The Consultant shall prepare final right-of-way plans showing all the necessary right-of- way ightof- way and easements to construct the improvements 8.2 The Consultant shall prepare legal descriptions for all necessary rights-of-way and easements (assumes 22 parcels) 8.3 The Consultant shall coordinate the appraisal, negotiation and acquisition process all - in accordance with die-LAG Manual (assumes 22 parceW 8.4 The Consultant shall prepare exhibits, diagrams and displays to support property owner negotiations w EXHIBIT A-1 CITY OF RENTON BNSF RAILROAD BRIDGE CROSSING AT HARDIE AVENUE DESCRIPTION The City of Renton plans to improve the BNSF Railroad bridge crossing at Hardie Avenue to accommodate a wider Hardie Avenue roadway section and provide for standard vertical clearance. EXHIBIT A-1 BNSF BRIDGE AT HARDIE AVENUE PRELIMINARY ENGINEERING/ `�✓ ENVIRONMENTAL DOCUMENTATION SCOPE OF WORK Task 1.0-Management/Coordination/Administration 1.1 The Consultant shall provide continuous project management and administration to complete the PE/ED phase of work(estimate 3 months) 1.2 Prepare and update a detailed project schedule 1.3 Provide monthly progress reports 1.4 Coordinate with City Staff as required(estimate 6 meetings) 1.5 Prepare for and attend Project Team Meetings(estimate 6 meetings) 1.6 Provide QA/QC Reviews of all submittals(estimate 2 major submittals) Task 2.0-Supplement Base Maps 3.1 The Consultant shall supplement project topographic base maps to include the BNSF Right-of-Way 1000'west of the bridge crossing. 3.2 The Consultant shall field verify base maps for accuracy Task 3.0-Sound Transit Coordination 1.1 The Consultant shall attend coordination meetings with Sound Transit to review progress and secure final design and right of way funding approval, (estimate 8 meetings) Task 4.0-BNSF Coordination 1.1 The Consultant shall prepare for and attend coordination meetings with BNSF to obtain concurrence on the proposed improvements(estimate 4 meetings) Task 5.0-Geotechnical Analysis 5.1 The Consultant shall coordinate a geotechnical exploration to develop adequate - oundationrequirements for the bride abutment walls aricrwin q g gwalls--- - - EXHIBIT A-1 Task 6.0- Environmental Documentation Nod 6.1 The Consultant shall coordinate all environmental documentation required for the project,which will include • SEPA Checklist Task 7.0-Urban Amenities 7.1 The Consultant shall develop an architectural treatment of the bridge abutment structure. Task 8.0-Bridge Design 1.1 The Consultant shall prepare 30%plans for the proposed improvements. Plans shall include: • Railroad and roadway alignment • Proposed curb,gutter and sidewalk layout on Hardie Avenue • Retaining wall locations • Slope grading limits • Bridge abutment,elevations/sections • Bridge elevation/plan/sections • Proposed Railroad profile • Proposed roadway profile • Typical sections and necessary details • Architectural design treatments • Construction phasing 1.2 The Consultant shall field review the project corridor to understand and mitigate the impacts of all proposed improvements 1.3 The Consultant shall develop cost estimates for the 30%design Task 9.0-Prepare Design Report t 1 T nsultant shall-compile all the data prepared to tas cl—T:0 through 8:0,- supplement :0;supplement as necessary with text and graphics and bind in a Design Report formatted per WSDOT Standards. EXHIBIT A-1 BNSF BRIDGE AT HARDIE AVENUE PREPARATION OF FINAL PLANS, SPECIFICATIONS AND ESTIMATES SCOPE OF WORK Task 1.0-Management/Coordination/Administration 1.1 The Consultant shall provide continuous project management and administration to complete the PS&E phase of work(estimate 4 months) 1.2 Prepare and update a detailed project schedule 1.3 Provide monthly progress reports 1.4 Coordinate with City Staff as required(estimate 8 meetings) 1.5 Prepare for and attend Project Team meetings (estimate 8 meetings) 1.6 Provide QA/QC Reviews of all submittals(estimate 3 major submittals) Task 2.0-Survey Field Staking 1.1 The Consultant shall field stake and profile all wall and abutment locations Task 3.0-Sound Transit Coordination 1.1 The Consultant shall attend coordination meetings with Sound Transit to review 'rr✓ progress and secure construction funding approval(estimate 4 meetings) Task 4.0 - BNSF Coordination 4.1 The Consultant shall prepare for and attend coordination meetings with BNSF to coordinate final design elements(estimate 2 meetings) Task.0-Bridge Design 5.1 The Consultant shall prepare final plans for the proposed improvements including the following: • Plans shall be prepared in such detail as to permit field layout and construction within a degree of accuracy acceptable to th City andin accordance with industry standards • Typical sections and details shall be provided, except for items available as standard details from the City,State, BNSF or APWA drawings • The plans shall show complete detail of construction of the proposed improvement including: Now o 5Limits of construction and removals EXHIBIT A-1 o Railroad Track Alignment o Roadway Alignment o Bridge Abutments o Bridge Superstructure o Bridge Foundations o Paving limits o Curb and sidewalk layout o Storm drainage layout o Utility adjustments o Retaining walls o Surfacing depths and details o Shoefly track layout o Railroad embankment construction o Construction Phasing o Channelization and signing o Property Restoration The estimated Sheet Count is as follows: Title Number Cover Sheet 1 Sheet Index, Legend and Abbreviations 1 Summary of Quantities 2 Typical Sections 2 Details 2 TESC Notes 1 TESC Plans 2 Site Preparation Plans 2 Construction Staging Plans 2 Plans 2 Profiles 2 Bridge Plans 1 Bridge Elevations/Details 2 Bridge Abutment Plans 2 Superstructure Plans/Details 2 Architectural Details 2 Propertyy Resr6ratkm Plans — 2 Total 30 EXHIBIT A-1 Deliverable with each Submittal to the City shall be: 60%Review Submittal 1 QA/QC Checklist 1 Construction Cost 15 Sets Plans(11x17 Size) 90%Review Submittal 1 QA/QC Checklist 1 Construction Cost 15 Sets Plans(11x17 Size) 15 Sets Specifications 100%Review Submittal 1 QA/QC Checklist 1 Construction Cost 15 Sets Plans(11x17 Size) 15 Sets Specifications Bid Documents 1 Engineer's Estimate New 50 Sets Plans(11x17 size) 10 Sets Plans(22x34 size) 50 sets Specifications 1 set Reproducible Mylars Electronic Drawings and Specifications 5.2 The Consultant shall prepare Specifications and submit for review at the 90%and 100%documents stage and submit final Specifications with the Bid Documents. 5.3 The Consultant shall calculate quantities and prepare construction cost estimates along with each submittal and with the Bid Documents. 5.4 The Consultant shall field review the project corridor to ensure the plans are showing an accurate representation of the proposed improvements $'tri Exhibit C Electronic Exchange of Engineering and Other Data In this Exhibit the agency,as applicable,is to provide a description of the format and standards the consultant is to use in preparing electronic files for transmission to the agency.The format and standards to be provided may include,but are not limited to,the following: I. Surveying,Roadway Design&Plans Preparation Section A. Survey Data B. Roadway Design Files C. Computer Aided Drafting Files D. Specify the Agency's Right to Review Product with the Consultant E. Specify the Electronic Deliverables to Be Provided to the Agency F.Specify What Agency Furnished Services and Information Is to Be Provided H. Any Other Electronic Files to Be Provided III. Methods to Electronically Exchange Data A.Agency Software Suite B.Electronic Messaging System C.File Transfers Format DOT Form 140-089 EF Exhibit C Revised 6/05 Exhibit D-2 Payment (Cost Plus a Fixed Fee) The CONSULTANT shall be paid by the AGENCY for completed work and services rendered under this AGREEMENT as provided hereinafter.Such payment shall be full compensation for work performed or services rendered and for all labor,materials,supplies,equipment,and incidentals necessary to complete the work specified in Section II,"Scope of Work."The CONSULTANT shall conform to all applicable portions of 48 CFR Part 31. A. Actual Costs:Payment for all consulting services for this PROJECT shall be on the basis of the CONSULTANT'S actual cost plus a fixed fee.The actual cost shall include direct salary cost, overhead,direct non-salary costs,and fixed fee. 1. Direct Salary Costs:The Direct Salary Cost is the direct salary paid to principals, professional,technical,and clerical personnel for the time they are productively engaged in work necessary to fulfill the terms of this AGREEMENT.The CONSULTANT shall maintain support data to verify the direct salary costs billed to the AGENCY. 2. Overhead Costs:Overhead Costs are those costs other than direct costs,which are included as such on the booksof the CONSULTANT in the normal everyday keeping of its books.Progress payments shall be made at the rateshown in the heading of this AGREEMENT under"Overhead Progress Payment Rate."Total overhead paymentshall be based on the method shown in the heading of the AGREEMENT.The two options are explained as follows: a. Fixed Rate:If this method is indicated in the heading of the AGREEMENT the AGENCY agrees to reimburse the CONSULTANT for overhead at the percentage rate shown.This rate shall not change during the life of the AGREEMENT. b. Actual Cost:If this method is indicated in the heading of the AGREEMENT the AGENCY agrees to reimburse the CONSULTANT the actual overhead costs verified by audit,up to the Maximum Total Amount Payable,authorized under this AGREEMENT,when accumulated with all other Actual Costs. A summary of the CONSULTANTS cost estimate and the overhead computation is shown in Exhibit"E"attached hereto and by this reference made part of this AGREEMENT. When an Actual Cost method is used,the CONSULTANT(prime and all sub-consultants)will submit to the AGENCY within six(6)months after the end of each firm's fiscal year,an overhead schedule in the format required by the AGENCY(cost category,dollar expenditures,etc.)for the purpose of adjusting the overhead rate for billing purposes.It shall be used for the computation of progress payments during the following year and for retroactively adjusting the previous year's overhead cost to reflect the actual rate. DOT Form 140-089 EF Exhibit 0.2 Revised 6/05 Failure to supply this information by either the prime CONSULTANT or any of their sub-consultants shall cause the AGENCY to withhold payment of the billed overhead costs until such time as the required information is received and an overhead rate for , 40100 billing purposes is approved. The AGENCY, STATE and/or the Federal Government may perform an audit of the CONSULTANT'S books andrecords at any time during regular business hours to determine the actual overhead rate,if they so desire. 3. Direct Non-Salary Costs:Direct Non-Salary Costs will be reimbursed at the Actual Cost to the CONSULTANT.These charges may include,but are not limited to,the following items:travel,printing,long distance telephone,supplies,computer charges and fees of sub-consultants.Air or train travel will be reimbursed only to economy class levels unless otherwise approved by the AGENCY.The CONSULTANT shall comply with the rules and regulations regarding travel costs(excluding air,train,and rental car costs)in accordance with the AGENCY'S Travel Rules and Procedures.However,air,train,and rental car costs shall be reimbursed in accordance with 48 Code of Federal Regulations (CFR)Part 31.205-46"Travel Costs."The billing for Direct Non-Salary Costs shall include an itemized listing of the charges directly identifiable with the PROJECT.The CONSULTANT shall maintain the original supporting documents in their office.Copies of the original supporting documents shall be supplied to the AGENCY upon request. All above charges must be necessary for the services provided under this AGREEMENT. 4. Fixed Fee:The Fixed Fee,which represents the CONSULTANT'S profit,is shown in the heading of this AGREEMENT under Fixed Fee.This amount does not include any additional Fixed Fee,which could be authorized from the Management Reserve Fund. This fee is based on the Scope of Work defined in this AGREEMENT and the estimated .414.01 person-hours required to perform the stated Scope of Work.In the event the CONSULTANT enters into a supplemental AGREEMENT for additional work,the supplemental AGREEMENT may include provisions for the added costs and an appropriate additional fee.The Fixed Fee will be prorated and paid monthly in proportion to the percentage of work completed by the CONSULTANT and reported in the Monthly Progress Reports accompanying the billings.Any portion of the Fixed Fee earned but not previously paid in the progress payments will be covered in the final payment,subject to the provisions of Section IX entitled"Termination of Agreement." 5.Management Reserve Fund:The AGENCY may desire to establish a Management Reserve Fund to provide the Agreement Administrator with the flexibility to authorize additional funds to the AGREEMENT for allowable unforeseen costs,or reimbursing the CONSULTANT for additional work beyond that already defined in this AGREEMENT. Such authorization(s)shall be in writing and shall not exceed the lesser of$100,000 or 10%of the Total Amount Authorized as shown in the heading of this AGREEMENT. The amount included for the Management Reserve Fund is shown in the heading of this AGREEMENT.This fund may not be replenished.Any changes requiring additional costs in excess of the Management Reserve Fund shall be made in accordance with Section XIV,"Extra Work." 6. Maximum Total Amount Payable:The Maximum Total Amount Payable by the AGENCY to the CONSULTANT under this AGREEMENT shall not exceed the amount shown in the heading of this AGREEMENT.The Maximum Total Amount Payable is comprised of the Total Amount Authorized,and the Management Reserve Fund.The Maximum Total Amount Payable does not include payment for Extra Work as stipulated in Section XIV,"Extra Work."No minimum amount payable is guaranteed under this AGREEMENT. B. Monthly Progress Payments:The CONSULTANT may submit billings to the AGENCY for reimbursement of Actual Costs plus the calculated overhead and fee on a monthly basis during the progress of the work. Such billings shall be in a format approved by the AGENCY and accompanied by the monthly progress reports required under Section III,"General Requirements"of this AGREEMENT.The billings will be supported by an itemized listing for each item including Direct Salary,Direct Non-Salary,and allowable Overhead Costs to which will be added the prorated Fixed Fee.To provide a means of verifying the billed salary costs for CONSULTANT employees,the AGENCY may conduct employee interviews.These interviews may consist of recording the names, titles,salary rates,and present duties of those employees performing work on the PROJECT at the time of the interview. C. Final Payment:Final Payment of any balance due the CONSULTANT of the gross amount earned will be made promptly upon its verification by the AGENCY after the completion of the work under this AGREEMENT,contingent upon receipt of all PS&E,plans,maps,notes,reports,electronic data and other related documents which are required to be furnished under this AGREEMENT. Acceptance of such Final Payment by the CONSULTANT shall constitute a release of all claims for payment,which the CONSULTANT may have against the AGENCY unless such claims are specifically reserved in writing and transmitted to the AGENCY by the CONSULTANT prior to its acceptance. Said Final Payment shall not,however,be a bar to any claims that the AGENCY may 'tow have against the CONSULTANT or to any remedies the AGENCY may pursue with respect to such claims. The payment of any billing will not constitute agreement as to the appropriateness of any item and at the time of final audit,all required adjustments will be made and reflected in a final payment.In the event that such fmal audit reveals an overpayment to the CONSULTANT,the CONSULTANT will refund such overpayment to the AGENCY within thirty(30)days of notice of the overpayment. Such refund shall not constitute a waiver by the CONSULTANT for any claims relating to the validity of a finding by the AGENCY of overpayment.The CONSULTANT has twenty(20)days after receipt of the final POST AUDIT to begin the appeal process to the AGENCY for audit findings. D. Inspection of Cost Records:The CONSULTANT and their sub-consultants shall keep available for inspection by representatives of the AGENCY,STATE and the United States,for a period of three (3)years after receipt of final payment,the cost records and accounts pertaining to this AGREEMENT and all items related to or bearing upon these records with the following exception: if any litigation,claim or audit arising out of,in connection with,or related to this contract is initiated before the expiration of the three(3)year period,the cost records and accounts shall be retained until — such litigation,claim;or audit involving the records is completed. �lrr►° , • Exhibit E-1 FEE ESTIMATE 11:.C4#411° ♦ Architecture Landscape Architecture Project: City of Renton • Civil Engineering • Rainier Avenue/Hardie Avenue Transit Improvement Project PE/ED . ................................. .........:.::::.:;:.;:.:.:::�;:....::.::.....:.;:.;;;:.>-.::.;:.;:-:;.;:.;:.;::.;:.;:.;:.:::.;;:.>;:::::<:>:::::::. .........::.;:::.;:.:;.;:.;:.:.;;:-;::.;:.;::::.:.::.;:.;�.;�1ours..............-....... .a .:fie.......... .....:. ............... Senior Engineer 558 $ 52.88 $ 29,507.04 Project Manager 796 $ 40.39 $ 32,150.44 Project Engineer 762 $ 32.46 $ 24,734.52 Design Engineer 922 $ 25.48 $ 23,492.56 Technician 1232 $ 22.12 $ 27,251.84 Clerical 270 $ 18.27 $ 4,932.90 Direct Salary Total $ 142,069.30 Indirect Costs: 142069.3 x 160.61% $228,177.50 Fixed Fee: 142069.3 x 30.00% $ 42,620.79 Subtotal $412,867.59 Reinbursables: Mileage $ 1,200.00 Reproduction Expenses $ 23,000.00 Computer Time $ - Subtotal $ 24,200.00 Subconsultants: Shannon and Wilson $ 176,304.00 Mirai Assoc $ 68,734.00 Weidener Assoc $ 66,800.00 BHC $ 23,078.00 DMJM Harris $ 122,000.00 APS $ 6,000.00 Subtotal $462,916.00 4/12/2006 , Exhibit E-1 '440' FEE ESTIMATE K P G • Architecture • Landscape Architecture Project: City of Renton • Civil Engineering • Rainier Avenue/Hardie Avenue Transit Improvement Project %PSE Senior Engineer 610 $ 52.88 $ 32,256.80 Project Manager 898 $ 40.39 $ 36,270.22 Project Engineer 1198 $ 32.46 $ 38,887.08 Design Engineer 1506 $ 25.48 $ 38,372.88 Technician 1978 $ 22.12 $ 43,753.36 Clerical 260 $ 18.27 $ 4,750.20 Direct Salary Total $ 194,290.54 Indirect Costs: 194290.54 x 160.61% $312,050.04 Fixed Fee: 194290.54 x 30.00% $ 58,287.16 Subtotal $ 564,627.74 Reinbursables: Mileage $ 1,600.00 Stew Reproduction Expenses $ 42,500.00 Computer Time $ - Subtotal $ 44,100.00 Subconsultants: Mirai Assoc $ 49,802.00 BHC $ 75,128.00 DMJM Harris $207,812.00 APS $ 16,000.00 Subtotal $ 348,742.00 'worm'' 4/12/2006 • Exhibit E-1 FEE ESTIMATE K p • Architecture • Landscape Architecture Project: City of Renton ♦ Civil Engineering • Rainier Avenue/Hardie Avenue Transit Improvement Project ROW .. ::.::::::::::::......................... Senior Engineer 26 $ 52.88 $ 1,374.88 Project Manager 68 $ 40.39 $ 2,746.52 Project Engineer 128 $ 32.46 $ 4,154.88 Design Engineer 324 $ 25.48 $ 8,255.52 Technician 436 $ 22.12 $ 9,644.32 Clerical 76 $ 18.27 $ 1,388.52 Direct Salary Total $ 27,564.64 Indirect Costs: 27564.64 x 160.61% $ 44,271.57 Fixed Fee: 27564.64 x 30.00% $ 8,269.39 Subtotal $ 80,105.60 Reinbursables: Mileage $ 500.00 Reproduction Expenses $ 4,000.00 Computer Time $ - Subtotal $ 4,500.00 Subconsultants: Abeyta Associates $ 379,830.00 $ - Subtotal $ 379,830.00 4/12/2006 Nino,• I EXHIBIT F STATEMENT OF DIRECT LABOR, FRINGE BENEFITS, AND GENERAL OVERHEAD FOR 2005 (based on year end December 31, 2004) KPG, INC. P.S. - I DESCRIPTION %Of 2004 Adjustments 2004 %Of Direct Expense Expense Direct Labor Labor DIRECT LABOR $ 986,162 $0 $ 986,162 FRINGE BENEFITS Payroll Taxes 15.7% 154,400 154,400 15.7% Insurance-Medical/Dental/Disability 8.4% 82,836 82,836 8.4% Paid Leave Vacation/Holiday/Sick 16.8% 165,983 165,9831 16.8% Profit Sharing (401K) 10.5% 103,771 103,771 10.5%; Employee Bonus 2.7% 27,000 27,000 2.7%I TOTAL FRINGE BENEFITS 54.1% $ 533,990 $0 $ 533,990 54.1%1 11 GENERAL OVERHEAD 1 Indirect Labor 43.9% 432,776 432,776 43.9% Legal&Accounting Services 1.0% 9,789 -$7,107.90 2,681 0.3% Automotive&Travel Expenses 2.1% 21,168 T 21,168 2.1% Bank Fees &Payroll Admin Fees 0.2% 2,125 2,125 0.2%1 Organizations 0.5% 5,280 5,280 0.5%j Training/Education 0.8% 7,900 7,900 0.8% Conferences 0.8% 7,750 7,750 0.8%j Publications 0.3% 2,770 2,770 0.3%! Employee Recruitment 1.8% 17,306 17,306 1.8%i Employee Services 1.2% 12,200 12,200 1.2%- Finance Charges 0.1% 600 -$600.00 - 0.0%' Professional Licensing 0.2% 2,092 2,092 0.2%1 Meals & Entertainment 1.2% 12,099 -$12,099.00-= 0 0.0%j Donations 0.1% . 1,380 -$1,380.00 - 0.0% Office Supplies 4.1% 40,034 40,034 4.1%) Equipment Support 5.3% 51,832 51,832 5.3%' Postage/Shipping 0.3% 2,708 2,708 0.3%1 Printing/Reprographics 4.1% 40,733 40,733 4.1%j Rent (17220 x12) 21.0% 206,640 206,640 21.0%,, Repairs &Maintenance 4.4% 43,000 43,000- 4:4% - Communications 1.7% 16,385 16,385 1.7% Utilities 0.5% 4,722 4,722 0.5%j Business Taxes & Insurance 12.4% 121,888 - -$42,140.23 79,748 8.1%; Self Insurance 5.1% 50,000 50,000 5.1% TOTAL GENERAL OVERHEAD 112.9% $ 1,113,177 -$63,327 $ 1,049,849 106.5%, i i ,:: . .. <>:>:;:;::;;.;:.;::<:.;:: :::::::::i':::: . .44:583::13.9E16041%1. :.. :. ;;;;:.:;.:>::;;;::,;;:.;;,:;:.:.<.: ;;;: ,;: :> : ; ;» 6g 327 _>>«>< 1OTAL:OVERHE:AD::EXPENSE:.::::::::::::.�::::::::::.:::�:67.�D$:fa:.:$.: ��47'[:67.:. :::::: ::.�........:..::::.::.::.:: . . :: . ::.�:::::::::,.:.�::.:::::: ::::.:::::::.:..: Confidential 4/10/2006 Page 1 Exhibit G Subcontracted Work The AGENCY permits subcontracts for the following portions of the work of this AGREEMENT: Shannon and Wilson - Geotechnical Engineering, Phase 1 ESA Mirai Associates- Traffic Engineering Weidener Associates - Environmental Documentation BHC- Water/Sewer Engineering DMJM Harris - Structural /Bridg- Engineering Aheyta Associates- Right of Way APS - Utility Locating/Potholing • • NIS DOT Form 140-089 EF Exhibit G Revised 6/05 Exhibit G-1 Niue Subconsultant Fee Determination-Summary Sheet (Mandatory when Subconsultants are utilized) Proj Rainier Avenue SW Improvements,Geotechnical Services Direct Salary Cost(DSC): Classification Hours Rate Cost Vice President 8 x $57.86 = $463 Senior Associate 0 x $45.68 = $0 Senior Principal Engineer 37.5 x $36.55 = $1,370 Senior Engineer 0 x $28.93 = $0 Engineer IV 26 x $25.89 = $673 Geologist IV 0 x $25.89 = $0 Engineer III 28 x $23.75 = $665 Geologist III 33 x $23.75 = $784 Librarian 0 x $27.41 = $0 Clerical 12 x $19.80 = $238 Drafting 5 x $19.80 = $99 Project Records 0.5 x $19.80 = $10 Total 150 $4,302 Overhead(OH Cost-including Salary Additives) OH Rate x DSC of 198.36% x $4,302 = $8,533 Fixed Fee(FF) FF Rate x DSC of 30% x $4,302 = $1,291 Reimbursibles: Aerial Photographs 1 x $50.00 = $50 Private Utility Locator 4 x $75.00. = $300 Drilling Subcontractor 1 x $2,500.00 = $2,500 Sampling Supplies 3 x $10.00 = $30 PID Rental 2 x $65.00 = $130 Traffic Control 3 x $230.00 = $690 Street Use Permit 3 x $100.00 = $300 Pavement Consutltants,Inc. 1 x $2,600.00 = $2,600 Sample Receiving and Handling-Jars 2 x $5.00 = $10 Sample Receiving and Handling-Cores 0 x $0.00 = $0 Water Content 24 x $10.00 = $240 Atterberg Limits 1 x $80.00 = $80 Sieve Analysis 4 x $80.00 = $320 Organic Content 1 x $50.00 = $50 Consolidation Test 0 x $0.00 = $0 Unit Weight(rock) 0 x $0.00 = $0 Point Load Test(rock) 0 x $0.00 = $0 -Unconfined compression test(rock) 0---—x- - - --$0:00— _ $0 Copies,Mail 9 x $50.00 = $450 Mileage 165 x $0.45 = $73 Reimbursable Total $7,823 Grand Total $21,949 Prepared by: Ad,!r p L A- -- . Date: April 10,2006 21-2-15696-001 Exhibit G-1 Subconsultant Fee Determination-Summary Sheet (Mandatory when Subconsultants are utilized) Projc Rainier Avenue SW Improvements,Environmental Services Direct Salary Cost(DSC): Classification Hours Rate Cost Sr.Vice President 4 x $57.86 = $231 Environmental Scientist IV 81 x $25.89 = $2,097 Drafting 6 x $25.89 = $155 Clerical 2 x $19.80 = $40 Total 93 $2,523 Overhead(OH Cost-including Salary Additives) OH Rate x DSC of 198.36% x $2,523 = $5,005 Fixed Fee(FF) FF Rate x DSC of 30% x $2,523 = $757 Reimbursibles: "visifil EDR map 1 x $65.00 = $65 EDR Sanbom search 1 x $50.00 = $50 Copies,Mail 1 x $50.00 = $50 Mileage 113 x $0.45 = $50 Reimbursible Total $215 Grand Total , $8,500 Prepared by. ,n›ti` /f g...5--- Date: April 10,2006 21-2-15696-001 ,,, Exhibit G-1 Subconsultant Fee Determination-Summary Sheet (Mandatory when Subconsultants are utilized) Projt Hardie Avenue SW Improvements,Geotechnical Services Direct Salary Cost(DSC): Classification Hours Rate Cost Vice President 44 x $57.86 = $2,546 Senior Associate 16 x $45.68 = $731 Senior Principal Engineer 126.5 x $36.55 = $4,623 Senior Engineer 86 x $28.93 = $2,488 Engineer IV 30 x $25.89 = $777 Geologist IV 0 x $25.89 = $0 Engineer III 100 x $23.75 = $2,375 Geologist III 154 x $23.75 = $3,658 Librarian 2 x $27.41 = $55 Clerical 29 x $19.80 = $574 Drafting 16 x $19.80 = $317 Project Records 8 x $1.9.80 = $158 Total 611.5 $18,302 Overhead(OH Cost-including Salary Additives) OH Rate x DSC of 198.36% x $18,302 = $36,304 Fixed Fee(FF) FF Rate x DSC of 30% x $18,302 = $5,491 fir►' Reimbursibles: Aerial Photographs 1 x $100.00 = $100 Private Utility Locator 6 x $75.00 = $450 Drilling Subcontractor 1 x $17,500.00 = $17,500 Sampling Supplies 14 x $10.00 = $140 PID Rental 10 x $65.00 = $650 Traffic Control 8 x $230.00 = $1,840 Street Use Permit 8 x $100.00 = $800 Pavement Consutltants,Inc. 1 x $2,600.00 = $2,600 Sample Receiving and Handling-Jars 6 x $5.00 = $30 Sample Receiving and Handling-Cores 7 x $10.00 = $70 Water Content 72 x $10.00 = $720 Atterberg Limits 8 x $80.00 - $640 Sieve Analysis 20 x $80.00 = $1,600 Organic Content 2 x $50.00 = $100 Consolidation Test 2 x $580.00 = $1,160 Unit Weight(rock) 4 x $30.00 = $120 Point Load Test(rock) 8 x $25.00 = $200 — - --- Unconfinedcompression test(rock) 2--- -x-----—$200.00 _ $400 —__--- - -- Copies,Mail 9 x $100.00 = $900 Mileage 600 x $0.445 = $267 Reimbursable Total $30,287 Grand Total rA $90,384 Now Prepared by: fL , ki)___ Date: April 10,2006 21-2-15696-001 :stint. Exhibit G-1 Subconsultant Fee Determination-Summary Sheet *40004 (Mandatory when Subconsultants are utilized) Projt Hardie Avenue SW Improvements,Environmental Services Direct Salary Cost(DSC): Classification Hours Rate Cost Sr.Vice President 4 x $57.86 = $231 Environmental Scientist IV 81 x $25.89 = $2,097 Drafting 6 x $25.89 = $155 Clerical 2 x $19.80 = $40 Total 93 $2,523 Overhead(OH Cost-including Salary Additives) OH Rate x DSC of 198.36% x $2,523 = $5,005 Fixed Fee(FF) FF Rate x DSC of 30% x $2,523 = $757 Reimbursibles: Nod EDR map 1 x $65.00 = $65 EDR Sanborn search 1 x $50.00 = $50 Copies,Mail 2 x $50.00 = $100 Mileage 113 x $0.45 = $50 Reimbursible Total $265 Grand Total $8,550 Prepared by: (�i t Date: April 10,2006 �r 21-2-15696-001 . Exhibit G-1 Subconsultant Fee Determination-Summary Sheet • (Mandatory when Subconsultants are utilized) Proj<Hardie Avenue BNSF Railroad,Geotechnical Services Direct Salary Cost(DSC): Classification Hours Rate Cost Vice President 25 x $57.86 = $1,447 Senior Associate 0 x $45.68 = $0 Senior Principal Engineer 72.5 x $36.55 = $2,650 Senior Engineer 66 x $28.93 = $1,909 Engineer IV 74 x $25.89 = $1,916 Geologist IV 0 x $25.89 = $0 Engineer HI 0 x $23.75 = $0 Geologist III 46 x $23.75 = $1,093 Librarian 0 x $27.41 = $0 Clerical 22 x $19.80 = $435 Drafting 14 x $19.80 = $277 Project Records 2 x $19.80 = $40 Total 321.5 $9,766 Overhead(OH Cost-including Salary Additives) OH Rate x DSC of 198.36% x $9,766 = $19,372 Fixed Fee(El) FF Rate x DSC of 30% x $9,766 = $2,930 err Reimbursibles: Aerial Photographs 1 x $50.00 = $50 Private Utility Locator 2 x $75.00 = $150 Drilling Subcontractor 1 x $6,900.00 = $6,900 Sampling Supplies 3 x $10.00 = $30 PID Rental 3 x $65.00 = $195 Railroad Nagger 30 x $75.00 = $2,250 Sample Receiving and Handling-Jars 4 x $5.00 = $20 Water Content 42 x $10.00 = $420 Atterberg Limits 4 x $80.00 = $320 Sieve Analysis 8 x $80.00 = $640 Copies,Mail 9 x $100.00 = $900 Mileage 220 x $0.45 = $98 Reimbursible Total $11,973 Grand Total $44,041 `ilary Prepared by: ✓J-tt,L. A- 9J-- Date: April 10,2006 21-2-15696-001 Exhibit G-1 Subconsultant Fee Determination-Summary Sheet (Mandatory when Subconsultants are utilized) Projt Hardie Avenue BNSF Railroad,Environmental Services Direct Salary Cost(DSC): Classification Hours Rate Cost Sr.Vice President 2 x $57.86 = $116 Environmental Scientist IV 25 x $25.89 = $647 Drafting 2 x $25.89 = $52 Clerical 2 x $19.80 = $40 Total 31 $854 Overhead(OH Cost-including Salary Additives) OH Rate x DSC of 198.36% x $854 = $1,694 Fixed Fee(FF) FF Rate x DSC of 30% x $854 = $256 Reimbursibles: *god Copies,Mail 1 x $50.00 = $50 Reimbursible Total $50 Grand Total IA $2,855 Prepared by: 0; t� �j Date: April 10,2006 Nord 21-2-15696-001 EXHIBIT G-1 Sub-Consultant Analysis of Costs- Mirai Associates,Inc. Traffic Analysis and Preliminary Engineering to 30%Design Completion Direct Salary Cost(DSC) PERSONNEL Hours Pay Rate Cost Project Executive 34 $ 66.37 $ 2,256.58 Project Manager 113 55.00 6,215 Project Modeler 46 62.88 2,892 Senior Engineer 180 32.24 5,803 Planner 0 28.89 - Engineer/Technician 138 32.03 4,420 Graphics/CADD 178 23.15 4,121 Project Coordinator 16 33.58 537 Administrator 16 23.15 370 Direct Salary Cost Total 721 $ 26,616 Overhead 123.14% of DSC $ 32,775 Net Fee 30.00% of DSC $ 7,985 SUBTOTAL $ 67,375 Reimbursables Travel/Parking $ 89 Reproduction/Postage 270 *low' Computer/Communications - Miscellaneous 1,000 SUBTOTAL $ 1,359 TOTAL $ 68,734 `rrr✓ Mirai Exhibit G-1.xls 4/11/2006 EXHIBIT G-1 Sub-Consultant Analysis of Costs- Mirai Associates,Inc. Traffic Signal and Street Lighting from 60%to 100%Design Completion valid Direct Salary Cost(DSC) PERSONNEL Hours Pay Rate Cost Project Executive 6 $ 69.69 $ 418.13 Project Manager 120 57.75 6,930 Project Modeler 0 66.02 - Senior Engineer 238 33.85 8,057 Planner 0 30.33 - Engineer 0 33.63 - Graphics/CADD 154 24.31 3,743 Project Coordinator 0 35.26 - Administrator - 10 24.31 243 Direct Salary Cost Total 528 $ 19,391 Overhead 123.14% of DSC $ 23,878 Net Fee 30.00% of DSC $ 5,817 SUBTOTAL $ 49,087 Reimbursables Travel/Parking $ 178 Reproduction/Postage 536 Computer/CommunicationsNIS - Miscellaneous _ SUBTOTAL $ 714 TOTAL $ 49,802 Mirai Exhibit G-1B.xls 4/11/2006 Rainier Avenue Environmental lmproverrec Cost Estimate Exhibit G-1 • Project Manager Senior Biologist/Planner Task 1 SEPA Checklist Hours Hours Review Existing Environmental Documentation 16 24 Draft SEPA Checklist 24 50 Revised Draft SEPA Checklist 16 24 Final SEPA Checklist 16 12 Review and Comment 32 16 Total hours 104 126 Summary Hours Hourly Rate Project Manager 104 $47.00 Project Biologist 126 $31.00 Direct Labor 58,794.00 Overhead S13,191 00 Profit $2,638 20 Copies $15 Travel $250 TOTAL ESTIMATED COST $24,99810 "Overhead 150% °Profit of Labor 30% Hardie Avenue Environmental Improvement Cost Estimate Exhibit G-1 Project Manager Senior Biologist/Planner Hours Hours Task I SEPA Checklist Review Existing Environmental Documentation 16 24 Draft SEPA Checklist 24 40 Revised Draft SEPA Checklist 12 24 Final SEPA Checklist 8 12 Respond to Public and Agency Comments 8 16 Task 2 Historic and Cultural Resources APE Development 16 16 SHPO Coordination 24 16 Draft Report 24 24 Revised Report 16 16 Final Report 8 12 Total hours 156 200 Summary Hours Hourly Rate Project Manager 156 $47.00 Project Biologist 200 $31.00 Direct Labor $13,532.00 Overhead $20,298.00 Profit $4,059.60 Copies $150 Travel $250 Cultural Resource Report $3,500 TOTAL ESTIMATED COST $41,789.60 *Overhead 150% *Profit of Labor 30% EXHIBIT G-1 Subconsultant Fee Determination-Summary Sheet BHC Consultants, LLC City of Renton: Rainier Ave/Hardie Ave Transit Improvement Project 441'w Water and Sewer System Improvements Phase I-Prelim. Engineering,Design Dwgs(30%) &Cost Estimate Direct Salary Cost(DSC) PERSONNEL Hours Pay Rate Cost Project Manager/Sr. Engineer 44 $ 44.00 $ 1,936.00 Principal Engineer(QA/QC) 0 53.00 - Senior Engineer 14 47.50 665 Project Engineer 88 32.25 2,838 CAD Manager 14 36.00 504 CAD Drafter 38 25.00 950 Project Administrator 4 25.00 100 Clerical/Word Proc. 4 18.75 75 Direct Salary Cost Total 206 $ 7,068 Overhead 173.00% of DSC $ 12,228 Net Fee 15.00% of Direct+ Overhead $ 2,894 SUBTOTAL $ 22,190 Reimbursables 'lo.v Communication Fee(3.0%of project labor)* $ 666 Other Direct Expenses(1%of project labor)** $ 222 SUBTOTAL $ 888 TOTAL $ 23,078 *Communication Fee-includes telecommunications, faxes, mobile phones, postage **Other Direct Expenses-includes mileage, reproductions, printing, delivery charges, outside services, special fees, etc. `r • EXHIBIT G-1 Subconsultant Fee Determination-Summary Sheet BHC Consultants, LLC City of Renton: Rainier Ave/Hardie Ave Transit Improvement Project Neal Water and Sewer System Improvements Phase II-Final Design/Prep. Of PS&E(60%, 90%, &Final"Issued for Bid"J Direct Salary Cost(DSC) PERSONNEL Hours Pay Rate Cost Project Manager/Sr. Engineer 96 $ 44.00 $ 4,224.00 Principal Engineer(QA/QC) 4 53.00 212 Senior Engineer 32 47.50 1,520 Project Engineer 298 32.25 9,611 CAD Manager 38 36.00. 1,368 CAD Drafter 212 25.00 5,300 Project Administrator 16 25.00 400 Clerical/Word Proc. 20 18.75 375 Direct Salary Cost Total 716 $ 23,010 Overhead 173.00% of DSC $ 39,806 Net Fee 15.00% of Direct+Overhead $ 9,422 SUBTOTAL $ 72,238 Reimbursables Communication Fee(3.0%of project Tabor)* $ 2,167 INS Other Direct Expenses (1%of project Tabor)** $ 722 SUBTOTAL $ 2,890 TOTAL $ 75,128 *Communication Fee-includes telecommunications, faxes, mobile phones, postage **Other Direct Expenses-includes mileage, reproductions, printing, delivery charges, outside services, special fees, etc. EXHIBIT .1- ( DMIM HARRIS 1 AEGON City of Renton Hardie Avenue: BNSF Improvements and Walls Detailed Labor & Fee Breakdown PEED and PS&E TASKS Project Sr. Rail Sr.Bridge Sr. Road Design Admin OIC Manager Engineer Engineer Engineer Engineer CADD Assistant Direct Labor Rates $ 81.00 $ 66.00 $ 47.00 $ 51.00 $ 46.00 $ 34.00 $ 28.00 $ 26.00 Total 1.0 PROJECT MANAGEMENT Project Administration , 8 40 40 88 Project Meetings 2 40 30 30 30 30 30 30 222 3rd Party Coordination (BNSF) 2 30 20 20 10 10 10 30 132 2.0 RAILROAD BRIDGE 2.1 Preliminary Design PE/ED _ Railroad Bridge and Tr, ck 2 10 30 40 10 40 30 162 Roadway Design I 16 10 10 20 10 66 Bridge TS&L Report 2 30 10 20 10 10 30 25 137 30%Plans I 2 20 10 40 10 60 120 262 I 2.2 Final PS&E i Rail Typical Sections I 10 20 40 40 110 Site Preparation 1 8 20 40 40 108 Traffic Control Plans I 12 8_ 20 20 30 40 130 Temporary Roadway Pan and Profile 8 20 20 30 78 Track Plan and Profile I 10 20 5 40 40 115 Bridge Plan, Elev., &Trp. Section 10 10 20 30 30 100 Brid•e Abutments , 10_ 10 40 30 _ 40 130 Superstructure Layout hand Details 10 10 _ 40 30 30 , 120 Architectural Bridge Details 10 5 5 30 30 80 Bride Abutments Structure Plans 10 5 25 20 30 90 Bridge Construction Staging Plans 10 20 30_ 10 20 40 130 I 4/11/2006 11 of 3 1 1 I 1 DMIM HARRIS AECOM City of Renton Hardie Avenue: BNSF Improvements and Walls Detailed Labor& Fee Breakdown PEED and PS&E i A TASKS Project Sr. Rail Sr. Bridge Sr. Road Design Admin OIC Manager Engineer Engineer Engineer Engineer CADD Assistant Direct Labor Rates $ 81.00 $ 66.00 .$ 47.00 _ $ 51.00 $ 46.00 $ 34.00 $ 28.00 $ 26.00 Total 3.0 WALLS 3.1 Preliminary Design PE/ED Wall Design 4 8 5 5 25 20 67 30% PS&E 4 10 20 20 40 40 134 3.2 Final PS&E l Wall Plans and Elevations 2 8 20 20 40 40 130 Wall Schedules and Details 2 8 40 20 40 40 150 Wall Sections 1 2 8 30 20 40 40 140 Design Totals: , Total Labor Hours ;,.n :;.32 :..336 `3: 228';',1,1;,: 546.0- " 215. . "685 ;..::;:<...: 800V 125 2,881 Direct Labor Cost 12;592 ,::.'$22,176 $10,716 ;:$23,460 $9,$90, $23,290 $22,400 . $3,250 `..117,774 Overhead @ 139% DLC $3',6Q3 $30;825: $14,895 $32;609 $13,747 $32;373 $31,136 $4,518 ' 163,706 Fee @30% DLC $778 ' .;,$6,653 $3;215 $7,038 $2,967 $6,987 $6,720 $975 35,332 Total Labor Costs I $6,972 $59;653 $28,826 $63,107 $26,604 $62,650 $60,256 $8,743 316,812 Reimbursables Reproduction $2,000 Travel $4,000 Postage $1,000 Flagging $4,000 Misc $2,000 Total Reimbursabeis $13,000 (6 4/11/2 j 2 o'f""3 DM M HARRIS E City of Renton Hardie Avenue:BNSF Improvements and Walls Detailed Labor& Fee Breakdown PEED and PS&E TASKS Project Sr.Rail Sr. Bridge Sr. Road Design Admin OIC Manager Engineer Engineer Engineer Engineer CADD Assistant Direct Labor Rates' $ 81.00 $ 66.00 $ 47.00 $ 51.00 $ 46.00 $ 34.00 $ 28.00 $ 26.00 Total Total Fee ; $329,812 • 4/11/2006 3 of 3 Page 1 RAINIER AVENUE CORRIDOR PROJECT KPG,INC. Exhibit G-1 :.••.:. :.:.i.: '...;:.,..::�i...i.:.i.::>...�i..i....'.':..:<i:.:...:..<..:..>...:i:....:::...:..:::».....::......<..'..>.....::.: ....>......:.>.....�.>..?....:.::...: '...::.:..•x.•:..:.i.i.m.i; ...j..„i .�.'.:.i.'.i.'%:..r.r..i..'.:».:.l.e.:..:li..'...i�i .i:i:.:i .i:'.:..:.: .:.. Y:::::.::..:.�.:.....:.:::.:.�;..::..<r:....::,.::.;>:.:.:.;: i>.i<i..:i:.. ij..:•:�:..ii..:::::..:.:i:.:.:<.i.;.i:::...;:::•'<.:..ri:: �.•.:::: .,iiiii.:.:i;;...: : : .:.:i;i,i:s i.::,,::..'::::.i::'.B:;•i:�...ii...i.::i<.;>+.•,.;•�: ;#:�?y':C•ii;:::::ir•.>.i..'i.:•::.i.ir.:.«.:::?..; :..:>:.:....i'...:..:�.:.::':.::.i. ..:.i:C ..:...;v:!..i"..::.�..:..'.i:•:.j.:.:.;.::..::•',.:.:�i:..•.:.;i:.!ii..i.v.:..i..;..; i>.•::: .r.:;.i,;i ":�:>i:5:a::• f.r:•.i ;F:;:;.S•.i:::.::..::.: 5.:.:• ii :::::.�::•:::.::r:;:;::..:y:i:'•:i;::::+. item 1;: Pro ectAdmtration Ii is .1.V1 : : ,..:: ; . . . ...: ;.:� < » .. . , . e�t, '< 1i�le:< :f ,<: aiaa.w< i «::iii.i; «1n 'l <>:;>:;;i«i<.:i;:>:::.::•�:•:':: :>.:..: : 1C.ts::: f :;::::.;; '.<' <;<> < `7, > )1y :i »> »> >> > <: : > > >< >«: ;>si: >< : .> »i<»? : i « ;i r: .. .. ..tilt'I Gos...........................:. ..:.,..,...................................... ..... :7..................................... .... . , :7i. ..:...:......:.....:................................................ :..::.... :....: •'`'.'''r2' 'z ::::': t: i::''':;+: !' ':i:::{ii?!''<'<:'? Y2':%i"`!:;2:�?'; ::::;':22 ; %;i<:'::::; ��'>` ::::%%`<`<{?:f ::::: '` :+i'5:??; ;::`<:>::% 22: >:<:, '.;:; :2:::<:::%`::%r>:::: ::r::<::::i:%::::::: :>:� iittArtt�1#. ..... . iiii.::.�::.::.:.::..::....... .....:.:.:.:.::... ...... . ....:::....:....::...::.::..:::::::..::::.:......... ..: .... .... .. .. ...... ,,,;;;, ..:.....................................................................:.:.:.:::::::..:::.:,..:.i:.�.iii::.::::r.::.:::::::.:::::::::. .,.. ...........:.............................................:..................:.......:.........::...::..::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::4::::::::::::::::::::::::: :.:ii:,::;:::. ,',, Administrative;!,...:::.................................................................6x:a>i:`'i ii.igi>:is as::i<i is t °' E:;iii:i:�:5 i;ii :a iiiiiii<:it:a t;ft :i:i?i::i?;irig;:+ it is:iia>:f:'.:.ii%;:iiii:4::::t:iaii is isi i.:{iit::if: to:i:i.::::� i:iii:>i:i:is ii:2<iiLgi.i iii°?:i>i:i::i:i !!!!t.ii:':> ,.; .....::.:••iii.. .... ... ....... . ..... . . ...:::..:iiii:...::::..,..::::.i:.:.; ;. yyy •:�qi:ii'i:'ii:';ii..:iiii::iii:.iii:•i:::i''ii::::•ii:.i::i:•i:•::•ii::i:C::::.i:.i i :, •::::yi;4:•i::: :i:'iii:iia:•i:a:::::•iiii:•iia::}:aii'•ii;i::;i:trii:aiiiii:: i:•ii:iiii:):ai:•ii:;a�:..-...iii:•i:r:;ii:•:vi:{::•i:'.aiiii;•i:•i'''':...... :'-::::....:...: .... ' i::r+'��•y1�' �yy�,(�' ... ..IM fi�6.i '.'. .::a:.:.::.::::::w:.�::v:;v::::::::::::: :• :;:•:;•::::::':::: ::�::.:.:?::•:i: :::::::::.::.•v:::::::::.:::::::.:i:::':yiy:.i'::::;::::;:: :.; iiii:'..:::.'.•:-:......-......'...... :; :. : . ... 5t � � ...........�...........�.. ... .......... ..... . . .. ... .................:::.::::i'::.::.:.�:;.:::;::::::.:::;iiii iii:.:.:..;::x.::::.i.i iiii:. :::::::::nom::.:. .:.: :::::.::.::::. ..................................................:: iii:t..ii.'•iiii:i,iii::ii:Ug ilia:iii':i�:'iii:;::s i:i::i i ii::§:j;:::::i n:i:Sii:i:.:i :iiii:::i::;::i::i.:ii:'':is iSgi::i:i.:;:::::::i: : :,:o.i.:i ti::::j:':i ii i::::i ii?'s is%: ::::.:: i:i; `',:. :::v: i':,, ,,,,:: :::,::,': i:,i':':':ii::,,,,, ..:....... :::i!v .i..iii: � .. ...... ....................... ......:� :,�:: :::•.;........^ ' � i:::::•i:::iii:: ;...:: ...- ......;.:............. ....:............. i:: i: :•:::iii:�i:�i:•i::.i:•i:::.i:�.:'ii:�ii:::'i:•::'i i:'.i:�i:'�:: s:•:: �.• ..... .........:.::.:.,;:i: iss::i;,:.isisii:• . ,:;ii:•:: •i:i<•iii:•iiii::.• o•.:::::::::::::.i': :.i'.:.:: .; .:.i::: ,>i:•:r:isi:;i:.;:isi:;;:i::o:•i•>:;ii:•':>•::iiiaiia::•:•:•i::i:i;:•::•::i<•i'i:ii<;:i :<.:::.r<;.:i of:a: :s:i'i:.i ;: i'i::::•i:i':::;':+ .r�.�� L]M�IY.il�air�:'.Wh:�iF!?iFii ::iiiiii::i'r'a ii'i:�ii iii i ::':1:::ii':iiii:iiiiii iiiii:::ii::ii`:::i;iiii'ii. . .....:. iiii::�:::: :.:::.:�:iiii'• :::::::::::::::::::::::::: i...... ....::.....:: .........::. • .... iiii:.:.�:::::::::::.i::;::.{'F .... ... .� ,. : ..... '. .... .,.. .:... ..:;i>x:•i:x•;:•i:a•ii si.>si:;•:aii:•i:•i:•::ai;;;:::a<•i:•:i;.:::ii:,i::Si::a:ii:i: : iii%_iii iiii:i�i�iiii Hours: 0 176 0 0 0 0 0 176 Direct Labor S' 14 86000 0.00 $ 14,960.00 iiii........:.iiii•.:,•.:.;;.�.i:•i:•i•:•>:•:............,. i.....::•:::.�:::. •::......::... ..:..........n............r...;::::..:.......... ............:::::.::::•.: .. ... .. ....... ..._.. .W....... .... ..... ...... .. i:•r.' :: �y�i;ii5ii:;i';::ri'm�'i:ice':;''S>i?i i:n ii'S'r:iiii%•,"•: •.'•.iiii•r:: <vi•.'• isj2�asii:ii%;riki"•,'•iSi� iii;i;ii Sikf'i ;;iiii>.i:i; o-iris?i ..................... .....:....... ..............:.,. ............... .:i... .::..:.. .:.iiii:.....;.i:.......`;:i:;;: f': .';:';'.;',;:<%:c�:'.':i•%:::i::..;;.:.... ...i..:.,..::�•:.�::::::.:�:::::::.:::::.;......:...'::..::•::..!:...:••:.:..:...iiii..i.:::•..:.:•..:•.:,:•:.'•;::..,;..;:.iiii•:::.:::::.,;...;;...;,; Item 2: RI ht f-Wa y;A:c uisit o o �� 0ev �;: % �>y > y; i ::i..•�::: ::o-i;Vi:::<'•:>:::': . ;:;;'.ii:::;:•i:::•;::u•::r::::: k:::; :> i s:<. .:.' ' ,. :.. "� iie.p..�..:_`,.:::.:::: ;.:;:;:;:+::;.ii.;::::2:::::•:.i.:li:::..:..::•:.::...::{<.':.:.i::.i..:.:i..ii'.:.`...:::.1?.. .s:ig:a. i:..;i.'.•1a:G;?•:•::'. ::i>::;.:<:i;::.i•i::{:.:.:: :. : :: ::;i:•:::•ii: .•:i ..i :•:::i.:::ii::: . S::f ::::'::;•.t:2 : ';.:;i::::•�i:�::i>::;::i;< •:i:j:5::.:`@'iii ;:i :.ii `':.i�: �tt6t... . i.i :. i; : % ii.iiiia :i i ?G : :',:i:iFT. iii;;: s:i',i4, it.ii.::i ::.. � : .: «;;>.:i;: :::::: :::: ;:..:::: ::::::':.i.i:. i:; : ..:•.::i::;ii.:...<::"i::;:i:::i;« ;.::;;:;:ii.::ii :.i;: ;<.:;..i;i:i ;:.:.,;:.:;'.:.:;..::i: :>'::»:::€:::i€:>:>':::E:::::i::::iiii:?»<::>::::::::...... ...... ..................................................................................................................... ,......................./Y� .:w�:S:7PR:: :i. :i.i.;: i +ii?::::::::::::::i :::.i :Y; %iiii::>: ::::}:y::::::::'+.i':? �Q ''3:':;:::4!...f#!d�l!1�1lt::.;M'�.. .:..!•i:::: r:::::•:::::i:::i:.::•: ::... .. ::i;i i:•::::•i:�::i:•i:•i:::•i:•:i'i::;:'::.i:�a:•i':�:ii'•`iiii:'i::'i ii:>'::::'i::'::•'::�:>i:;•>:i>:•i:•i>:.>.,.;:':i;a:•i:o:•ii:•;;,�.i:::;:;:�ii:;::;is �y ....... iiii<�: ii:<:•: i>sw�i:ei:<aii:�i::i:•iiii>ir'•i:•::: .i:;.ii:;.i:•i'�a:>::< :ii ii:::i>ii::r.;:ai»;i<:�:•>::»::a:�::::�iwic::.:; •: :`:Y.:`"`i<4;ii;:::!iii i:i::iii: :: :';:.,.:.:.:.....:.::>::::;..;.;:.;..,>'.:''>::<::::::•i.,;;...,.,.:::::..::::.i':iiii.t'i>•.;;•::.::.>:::.>::<.i:':::.:i::« 4 :L;::; i:; i::i: i :;;::::i::S::i:: i : : : r :: t t nte' . t.. '.:. ::ii;:Dat>�Irr����,�a . � �e. :<::::.<:<.:<.::.;.;.::.i:.�.:::::.<.::.i.:.::::.::.::.::.>::.:.i:::,:<.:ai:.i: '«.: :::.i:•i:<;.:::;.::;,i:.:;;i.::'i:.;:;<:i::>::>::>::>::isisi:>::,ii: :iii'>:'i::i::>�'>::>::i::ii::<::i>::ii::i::::ii:i::i::i:ai::>:'iii>:.:.i::ii:.: <>::i;i:.ii::i:<:i>ii::'i:i:;<i::i:: : i>::i>i:i:<:i:::>::ii.>i:: Hours: 0 973 0 0 0 0 0 973 Direct Labor;•':::..:.........:.: :.;..::...:,...; ....'' 82 705.00 0.00 1 $ 82,705.00 ,.iiii c;a•:•:;•r•i'•::•ir•>;i::•:: '?:::isi::r:::?:;iiii:::i::i'i5:i•;: ;: Direct Labor Totals: Hours: 0 1149 0 0 0 0 0 ii:•r<..........»iiii:1149iiii:•i................. Dollars: 0: 87665.00 0.00 0 0 0 0 S 871665.00 Direct Salary Cost: '> t;>ir> »>":: s;<i 9,70. f"a Rate:DirectLabor Ra Parcel Breakdown: ;>lr�i1a'�»'>#« <'>>: ,Per P r a Rate: Overhead Audited :,..x.:.:,;„„:„...,;,:.,..:.:.:.:.:;;;;;;;;;•„,::::::•:::: :•::.:: :I `. Profit: Composite Multiplier: P *Total Labor Fee: $ 87 665.00 l.. i Expenses: il.•r;ii•:•. ii y;? l .'+,$ <::iij is,`t,..., :'f. I Review ralsals (27) ,:i: d t< �„,,, ,' Appraisals(27) ;9..1'8.0 )Os::::i :.i« >, MlleaeRravel . .<iilii`s `"i » '€ . i . :<; -' !ReprographicCoPY,&Printing : Courlex Overnight Postage %>9ii1!i<i !»:?f;< !>!,>'?i> i..20i4,. Subtotal: $ 111,425.00, ( ':> tietg. *TOTAL S >> 208,08o.oo Absyta Aitlatee s---. iM1/2005 ( Page 1 ( HARDIE AVENUE( ..2IDOR PROJECT Exhibit G-1 KPG,INC. 1.1•,��....Miii........,...:Alii. ... ........0'.. >'P ,1 'si'tg':�ai{ii%'.`" i??? «! ';R::::,::iiiii . „..,.':'i:' r;i;k:ois....„.;i¢' ::..�.;•:::. ::!:.::..,: ::. 1111 . .. . .:. .:..•:: ::1111:, 11;1.:� . , :..;,. tem 1: Pro ectAdministration ?c�ii ' !{�i:['a:r;:;: '>;ia:i'5'"`i::'i:i•'::>:?,<<<:'(:;<;; ;+'�;P'!;:!�'>i`i '''`;i;::1,;:,%;i;ii:i; ?:!''!;' <?;i:;i:.>i it!2:>< ;;;j `: :; 'y:;;ii +ii:<! i '' rap M marl Aa rent o : +int. >1 g+arit ,T.itie :REQ :iii arow ir. :'':total # ' 1 •:1:1::::::•:1:::::::::::;:ii::.:i:::.::i".�<?...:.:?!..:.:.y,:.:..::::..:::>:::.:?..:.>h::.:.{�;�:..;:::.;.,;;..::: :::;:::�:,....:.:::.::.::. ................... i:sii � .. � {........:...,. ::::::::::.�::::::....::.::::::{::.::.,..}•:::1:::1:,,1:;1>:.::..;...;;?.,;:.....:.... ....................:::::.:,.:::::;:..........:........:....:................ .:.:.;:.:.:..... 1:1:11::.}•.:>:..,... {;.......... 1111.. 1111. .<,>::�:>:.::..�<:.>:.::.,.:..�:::...:.:.,...�:::1;111.:. � ?.::•.:..{:,::::::.{�:{?:.>:•::.;:•;:•:>«�<•,:::�:•:>:�i:::':i•�i•>�• %�< ::�i• 1111...:•..:•;:::.::.>: r...:. :1:1::1::::1{.•'ir.viii:'ii :iiii>••;::::•;>•.},> :::;.,.;..!;;�; 1111. :rl;?•Y:i.•:;:;•i:}.•:i:>::::::>:•:•»i';;::. .. : �:::::::::::::::::::: ?rl.rrttnlftil,[I,�t,1,�,/1,1;1„Hknh..;kr1t•r{et.MrxHxf.xf.rihll+tfr:xHNftlxrxxitMffitix.ni'lmrmxttxrlrexnrff _ .::::.:.:::::::•::::::::::.�:::::::::;::::::.::}::::., 111,1 ''65':':. .,, . `fxYl.i:Ntr 111111111 xlrlrif111it 111x111 1 IIItf 1111 it Ix :;....•.v;•: ...:.. ..:..:: .:1111 ...::.;:•::�::::•:�:.;•.:.;.:�:.;.::.:::.:.:::;:::::.v::•: ::::::::::..v;•:::::::;•.•:;;•..�:11;��.......... .................... t tx f tt 11f Itff tit flltttl.tl tri x.rf.tlxr. .. :;:;CJ....1.....................1....................1...............ft+,tl,wtr}trxllt,l,i1n 11rrn1rr1nrltltnt I. r ;ri .«..?.;.......,.........::•;:.:::.:�i:.:::;.+•%<:i•<:i�:::;::•#:••:.+•:•:::;•i;:•:;•i:•i:::•::•i;:i:i;:i i::ii::ii::•Y:i{;y:;;•:::•:••••:::+;::;{ii::::.i:•:�:.;::<:.;.};:::.:}•..:•.••>:�:•:�+;•:••%••:::.:;�<+;!:::.;•::.,;�:.:.: .�::::::.:•::•:., :.�::•::�:.;.:.:�:.;.:!.�::::,:.: .. ::::• :.. ..,....�.....................:r.r+.1.....,:.::r,»::::r:r:•::...,;111,1.�. :..1:1:.,::n ..1. t .. . . . .i! . . :..+:..+::.... ..11,..1....:.1.... ... . . ... .......::;::.. . .::,:,r1::•::::r11r::...r:,:.,r1.r1....,+..:::r..:1r.:1.: .:++:.::.•.:++:.:::+:•:::::.«.::?:::•:: 111 <.:rt 1 2 . ::;.::::.�:.:ii.::i;}:•��: ::: >%11111++%:'°:;% ��-m���,,,yyy��y !•rdi f:,y: :iw it:: 1�: �NYIitF.ff•��:..yy�y�,,,,}tsy. ....................v...�;......::.;.:;:v:::::::;:::;.;1111.:}:N:•i;y'4'•;4{.}•!,{•;,.. :.; :�::::•::'::::•::•:•i};;•i: :.:::::1;.; ..:;.;:...;v.•1:1:1:1::::. v:::•i:3Y::;�:;:•:•}:;:}:::!::+ .............:...::::.:•::::.;'• :::.;•.:::.;;..:;,:.. 1111.. 1111:..;:u:..::.:.,v, .::v::'•'.:%ii li;::%:•�r:: :.: ;......:':::..w:::::m•y::.�::::::v'{C:i:iii'yv:•iv: :'r;•::::.::?:;'. ::::.:.}+.•:y:4>::•.};...;iv''ii:" is i;:�'i:t't2%' ' .{:%:%iii::i:ti?%::%i?:;:•,3:•::::•'i%:%:•:{::•:•:1'1:15+ $}{:3:'ti%:%:::•iii:{::•:{:ii:>:ir:ti::;:�%:•:ti::::{:;::::{:;:iiF:::i:v::i:ti�;::iii:•::•i}:•:%,:::5::;::;::' .. ,.:. .:::::: 1111. •i:4'v'4:?•}::.. .::..}}::::•::•"•:. %i?::•:•iiii•'i:••: %i'':•:•sifi:%:Si :+.:}is�l•:•:�i•}i::{•i};;:'¢'•i'„v::4:v:'•;,y.�•.y,::.;;v:.�•:.v.w.i:::+;v., ""+;11;'':x:7:+:::':.ii:'.i'.;.:;.,:.,:�:;'- :::. + ii.O •.v::••:::;;:: 111.11111.1.11.111....1..1..1.. r.•::::::::?lh:1v::.i•:.:{,r,'::4;::!?l:>.:aii�+1:::: 1111 ry::.?w:.d^::. ;'.v:". (y .. ;..;1111 :v•:•:.v:::::::•:::••:::1::111;1111;.:i::.v::::::::v::.•:v::w:::::::::;::::.vr:::.:..;..v........................................................................ ........ sfls :: � .'•;i;'•1,'•113;:};iii;;.;:ii' iJ iii:1'111:1'1 is%ii::'!>i iii y%;W;:;:i::;:•i:•i �+ + y..::.::, .::.:::::::::.... r :. :.,,+:.. .r?:?y+r'{'>r:, �i;i,i:Yt%:"t##':::��ii;�::::#i: ............3s..!!. `M. �y,.i.,,,,�.%::;+.:>3:%:�?;=.'::dt:i'+.:::'s�?%�:+:#'+:%::ii:ix!:;•<1.:;•is:!}.!{.:+{%ii:....:.:�;11::11.....,+,gin,::::: :+1•,1:x1;•?.};3;%';:;15'1'.;1;:.;.:.f.:...:.:.:.:..::•. .r 1111 •::: ............ ............................ ... ............................ :1111.. .. ..1::1..1. f �.. .. :..1....:.+ ;:1:•111...: ��tt�,, :11:11 :...;;1111::.:•,.:.�.:•::%>:•::+•>:•i�>.::.::.......:.::.>•:. . ..1..... 1..::::::::... .. ..:......:....�:::::::...�:::...::.... 1111..:... ., ; ' .,............. ...•....... . ..:. ..;:.�.:�..::..�:}:;:::: }}:!::.::;::.:•:: 1111::::;:.::::::.:•>:.:;: ... .:;'.i 50:,11; „"'''`': • v?:1 ri;#;:::%iG i::.'•ii}'iiAiiii iiiiii�iiiiiiiiiai"!:!':r%:%iiii•+'•ii•::::••: m:::•rn}»;wr.:rv»>:::r:•:;•:•ir:;+>»:•:>•rr:•'+'r:c»:•so-ii.!•}}»:.y:f.:}•::+>;::::+::::+:::::::::::tilligii:ii:: :::::.'' 1111 .. .. .............:.....�..:.:.:....... .. 11,11..:. :...1.......,.1.......�.....................:. ...1.........1.........1......../......... �, .. ..................... .. .. ... .. .. ................:1......1................r........:...::.:.:. 1111..............::...... .. ... .}.. .. r� M. .. .....................1111...1111... .. .. 1111 1111.1�,�1.. .....1.......1.:::::::::..1 .�::.::�:::::},?:1�:::::{•::•>:•::'•:i:.:::•:.;;:x::.::::.:�: .�::: . . ., :. y�� � ......................... :1111. ......�.,..............�r. �� �' •�� . ..........1...........r...:...............1.......:....::...:1:.:.�..:...:..........{.:::::::::.:.::•::1::111.: .. .:::.::.::::.�::•.:�::::..::::. 1111 .. ................................................ :::11 :11.......11..........11.1.:..:::.. 1 •::::::::::.::t<?•:•:::•;:1;.%: :::ii:::•;::::::•::.�::::•.,::::<.:.�:.%%:<iii::i::ii�:iiii•iii>isliisa:::>:<:::::::sE:E::?i3i�:::%33!.,' . :::: ':•::::11:11.;..�111:::::1:•:•::::: :...:.:::::•:..�.:::::•::.1.:..1x... 1.'7�...,. . 1111..::: 1111. 1111.. ... 1111..r...r.....:...::.::r r::i•:::::::::.:;:::;:•::•::.::::.::::::•:+:::•:::::::::::::::::n•..'::r,::..:::.:::::.. ..................................................... ':::: .. ...:...:...:::...:.:::.i•:.•::•:.;:?..;::;:.:.;111:1:.; 1111 1111 . .. ::1:111.:.;........ <•:;:3;ii:;:i<•i::•:;is{1::»: li»;:};:i::#i::i:;?2::if{i;:::i iR2$iq,'t2 ilii:ii::iii{::::::<::::i::::;::i:::::; 1111.. :�" Vit# i.' �':•:i<c{::•;::::::::i:::�:>•.:.•::•.:•:.:•:.::::•.::. �:'•:'� 'MT � .. $1,:;11:;;::,;:;;1:'+.�:•ix<:ii?+:iii:::.::::::<.:::•::iii;i1i i:•iiiiii::iii::11111:: i::::%i i:'tr,.ii63i{,,;;,.:>•:::•;:>:.,.;; ...: 1111. .......... ....................:?::••>:•>:a:{•::.:;:.:•:;:.::•::.:::.:::<,;:.::?•: 1111... ...•.,. .,.�.••.,,.... :r?:•:::::}:fixs�::: :.t 111:1:.. 111:::1. :1:11:::::::1:•:::.•::::::::i:;::::::::::;. .........� 1111:: ,. :::.. hi•:: ..r•>:•.•::::::iih::••::::,•h , 111,1::.:;••::1:1::::11�.:: :1?>. �:.:.•:::.�•::.:::..�.::•:;.�•;.�:.::�:::.:::. .�::::::::•:n�1.::.':((::::/::::::;1::::1::, ti ............ 1 tY ............1• 1 .-r'ri i, ti r+ 1 t 1111..::,.:.x111.n.r....•+::,:::.::•:,.:;::::::•:.:•:.:�;•.,�: 1 .. ..::::::::'.:::>::::.:ii#::::?<::.:•::.::•::.•::?.::::•::::.i::lits::::::>;iiiii :•::i::•i:11xii.:i�::•;::.:::•::.�::iiMiiii ::::::7::.•::::::::::::::::x::::::1::�:.:::�:::::::::igi 1�:::1:�:1�.�:•::....:�1117 Al 1......4.1.:1111.!. " .,., 111,1 ., is .ioidi2 ►,'.. �i �'��#�f1•.f�*:*.i:.;iR:;:ii;:;ilk:i;i##:�i�i%i;:iE?:z:E>i:::>:%:'••:%3i�ii:E�E�i%::E#�:E%isi%i#isi:::;::?:::i<�> :'rE::'>:`•i: E:i:;>�i;:gift;:'': 771 •:>:�:.:;:•:::::.::.,:•:•:•:i:::•:::�:>::::.;:.... 7777�::::::..•::::::::;:::::::::::::::•:::::::::::•::...;...:.::.:+:.:::::::::::::::::::::::.•:::::»:•:::::::::::::::::::::,rn+....»::::::::::::::•+7.777;::+::r.:: :...:.....::.::•.::..:.... r..r...•::;:i%1 is%•:•,••:•?:�••;+::iii:::;:::1;: .� ........_................................ .. .......�{.•:?•.{!,177: + r::.•r....... ....:•:.:....r...?%3iik'.^:•,'�:�r',: %%'u>iE�::'•5 ;i'• �r;`,'•:':':: o) .1y u.u....1111 1111.. ...�.:.... •:. ...........u....:;::•::::::......::.•::.{...:::....:..vyv,.•...:.v:;•:..........................1......:...;.:.:::+::;::.•.•::;:••.�':::?:�:':?�:�?:':i:i'::V :•::•:''::::::iii: • r.. •� .. .�..... ........a. 1111.... �...........................::.........1 . •...:�..� : .�: Hours: 0 0 174 �0 0 0 0 0 Direct Labor$: 174 0.00 14790.00 .00 $ 14,790.00 y''Y. %1#::r.':> '7':}X :.:9 R':^:f" +rr::r r:a:: 7,777 ..>., .:y..:::•:?i1:1,;iy ., .., •i, .,,..; 1;,111. 7777 :.:.::.:.•::; , .................... y .:••1717:?•.�•1111..:;:•.•771•:,.!•-.�-:. ,.,,,,,.,,,•:,:.. ..�:,..�:.9,.35..1!:.{:.y..:r.i r n{•..u 7111,•j,...\1111 ri.h 1111.. ...�....:...:. r.:. : ......{:::. ..... ,.:•::::..:.::::::•:;::•:!•7777.7777.7777:•7717::•.•. f'}... ... ry...... 1111...:r.:r:........f........ ...,1111 1177:�:.....:...•Y: : ......1..,....1.,.:1..:....1... .ii....i.. ..h:.1 y.•.y,•.:•v{..:1.1+7111::}:.:..::..::+...•: 771{+'7.. :n?+.. ........,.:.::•:.••.:•1:•...,........ ,.•. :;:;:;:11111.�iii: iii:iiii>:':'.':?� 7777::: :1{• ��{,��:•1•;:iii:;:?•i.:.:i:{3::::+':{{{••. .+:•S:f4:•%f.:•: ...::........ 1111.. ?.;:.}::.::4•{{::{::1i•:f:^.'.y'+•�,Y,>�/.;;;•?:.:{.:.+.:#+�>iv1:l r:,/••....�.{7111. rr:.:....:....y:....#i'..i..r...r..... r.. ,.;..:.::'I.•S; .....:...........................�..............,........:.:::::.:: y::fv:1..1 ..f....y::.:. ::.•:•,,•:,f.. 'i:1 ..'f..1..11..11.1:11hv1.r: \. f .+r/:: .;.{.....:::,::7177'..: 1 A+:••,:•• :/ 1x17:. /111'1, :r 1r i"+};;:•{+++/J+%f .•f...i.:.;;vv.• . •':•• :{?rrs}ri::::•'i:ii 1 r•r.•::rr:+:r:+:1' ""'v ' '::•; ,;.. .+:.it .{.!::...rr..r. :<u.+{{•rt+. ..a..::1......r..r..r r.+.!1...!.<•...u.rr:. .{v..+.{,.:{??!ev{??7111 1/,•117;' :..y,.:.... .'b. r... ..r{•% .:;.:. .;1537;+.>:� Item 2. Right-of-MI/Acquisition :.:{.:•;:•>:•>::v ..�...:, :::?7777; 111.7{ i•i}:: 4 •7771. +::'::::.... :::.iy.... •.v••x:.::.:.:3:: :.:.v,.i:iiii' .iF:: 1137..;, 7,11;1 '7717:. •...::...r•:..y..::ri::: ..::.: ...; ... 1:::....1.::v.•:::7717•:771;..•:11,11,, :::i:...::.`.. 1777., ..{::•: :t1Y,., •:3:•:i}1:;�....:::..:: •7.771.,.: .; 1,1,;11 .:.....:. r..::••.y1.... r....„1..1:.:.++: .....::•f:f•:•.:::::: ;>:.::.::.....;.....:..:r.•......:..:..a.. '.`�:•"::•"r.'::�:r':'r. 7771 .::•::: .:•:>:•>: ::::::.:.. .;.�::::::...�::.:.:::•:••:::;111..1,�:•:: 77.71•:.::::::•177::. ., ?? .�<.�,•,!{{!?.::.:?!.:::::..+.r:;::::!.........;.,+..:<!?•:?a,...•.{•::...:.:f.:.y:5!•r::?{{.rr.•.n:t!,.;....ur,+.+,•�i..;...,.r:{{.r:: }::•.•.:.!;?{t+.•::::>•:?c!;{{!?•:t{b:•}:?•:!::{:?r,?{{{!.;;+,•:{?{{,.�'•,i;;!???r ++{.:::i..! ::, � 1771:::.{;:.w:;::o:':,: f•1::!:;7711 ..f., 111. ..C.. .1.. {. 7771... 1111::.{r:..... 1111.•;::{:;:.; ..+••t';..:::.:.�7777• r......,...r.. .::•7171;:.:...:... 1111. ..:.:;: .wwi:•i;•:::{c:x:i>•.,�,..:... .::: w:;,:; :<+.t 1:•>:;:xc;o-:.:,•:::::::::•:;:••:i1;::i:{{•::•:?•:''• i:'r'r3i:iri:i::iii:i ifitii ;�:zei : 7171.,.. ............ :.:{•1:;•;••:•::.:::.}>•:•+: ..�:... :. ••. ....................:........... ... .. .. .. . 1111... ....:.... ... ...�.�.1777•:::::7r:.:..:�{7777<?:: :...::..;:::::•::.:... 1171.....::::.:i.'•:<:.......... ...........r......1...........:.................. . ...�. ... 1111�� {I.�:�?1... .. .. .. .. ... :................... ........:....1.. ...:.......... .. ... ..............................................:........... 1711.. ...........,•::..::.::•::.:::.v:::::::::::::::::::::.�:::.�...<•::r.• .1.a•+.:..a:::e.::::::..:r:::: .:.7717.:........:................................... ..: :.:.':.,. ::ii:?•..,.....41x...1�..V"...{ YI 1 { 1 1 ............. .....................................r.............. .. ::::;;1 x:::::::•7•••777 ry::;:r::::•:.yv:::::;:::w:::;;:::::::::r v::::•:.:``u:•,3;::•:::v:::••::i:::{17;77'•:'•::1:L?•::'•:::'•:::::•. yy� 1111:::.;....::;:•:.:.�•:7:.!...:71:::::!::.:1:: !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! �:....:v:::;'••:v:;•::............:........................��'..............1.......i..........,Y,i„✓....r... r++ iii i i i kt t < ..7171': :: '7'/:'i:::.:';..;,''. 7777....:.�:.,;:: . .; 111.1 .....::.:^'•::�:.::'v;7.777:...i:':•77'17: >:x•1+:71+{ 77.71� � 77;17. ........ •:.�•:.;••::•.•;.•v.••::?+.::::..::::iri ... ... ...:..:::..::.:r::..i;. 1777'•::;?:::•1171. :� ::nv:::: r.::1 7111•.?•1i y:i::•::.:•.;",:�!:::,•:�: •77;'71;7•777:•::'7717; •7777.: :. � ............:...:.....:.;...>:•>:.:::•>•.::{«11;•77.>:::::::. .....::::.. ..::.:::. ..•. ............ �! .: v 1717.:.� :>:•::.:?r:•>:•>.:{•>.�::>:::.::.>........:............... .:........:................... ......:.... .�:� ..�!�:� . . .�?.. 1711.. •7177•:.::::::::: .�;7771!•7117:.:•::•..•: 1111. ,1.:.r... ::.�.. ...........................................::.......::. ....: ....r. .::..4....v..., ...:..........1711.. : \•i:7777:•:{{{•7777:{1777;^:?7777::•?. 1111 ..... 1111.....................•.. .. 1111. ................. .. r•• .x:.: • •..f.:A;.}.•:v:... 111 . :. `) ��y� ... � +. RL:::rr.»r:1.:r.:•:r»fx::::•::•::'f..::?•......:.::/.:..11..rv:Nr:r:+ +»::••:::::v:i::;:.:•isi?i::;.;:•Y''i#:i� ::?�':! ::;:':1...5:;:'':i .�:�154 :':. ; ,.,, n+ i:+�•:ti::•:41•:•:%:•:!•:<{7117:.%ii:•:;i:•:•3:::::::•,'••i:!!!!:::y!3:: 3✓1d �.v::::;.w::::::•::::•:ir+.?•?:+.?:r;.r:::+:rr+,.•rr.:i 11.1::1:•:"iii•;.%iii: ii/iii iii'i::'•ii:iliili•1.•li iiii is::31 .. ;.;v. .;:.;1117.:•1777{7777:.�:::::.:. .................... .. ............ ........ 771;7 ;•.:::..:,.v.•. :::::::::::w:::::: 7777!:? •r:.�::::::::,v. :.�:::::.;'.;:. 7777 'i'#iil'i'i; �:%1"31%'!i i;.•,{{:ii:ii1111,#::#:'.::4:'f.';::i?}:i::{:C::%iii:!?.....:::'i,:iioiF ;i;i?a:y:'i::%i`::%i:%:'{:.%;�::;:i i::.!+.>.i}'i i:::{i:i:t:�::::'.:1771 ,;; 7711:.'.. '. :.;;: •tII •:::.v:,w::.:v::t:•.w::::;::::::•1h;:.v:.::.:::. •:i:iI;ji::;:1:::::..1:11111111.1.111 1111:............:....:.+::I•i i 1'•:11..111.1.111..11 111..1111.11.1771.:::•.:::::::::.:.::..,: 'y.:,::::::., 777;.,,::.:, '::::........ .....1...................1........:...:...:...:.:..:.:x7:7.•::..•::,:•::.:::;::::::::• 1711 1. ..........11..........1.........:..................... ., .;;;;�t1111;.111�,It1111 N;ly1:;IM::;lyt l;if;lttt;itftl,ltitlx.;;t f.t.i111111.t11,11.t,Irt.f4tl It til...111.111'I'.171..IIII 1111 1,Itltlt.tt '••"+ """""""""'""""""""""1711' .1..1.11.1111.1.It 1111,111 h.lt 1111 III.Ix ttllt..iM ,f.17t11 Hltil xt IIIc,1f 71 111111x1,till/if lilt tt I1111.I.f11 t1 :,:•,,':,33,9 1 •1 .. 1111.:1.;1;........;..1;:. ...............1.........f....1.1......1.......f.........................1....................................... .. 1..11...1 111. ;111;.1717+: .:n::i.v: ...........1..... 1111 .;y;•;•,• :'i::•:.;.;..;. c..1:...1..1...............:..:. ................ .. •v/. r ::x+rxv:::i•:1h:�Yh'i•:'h}:•Y:Yi{h.:•i{::::•ilib::ii•::Y::rra:n11.::1::rr. : ...i.. r.x r: .1r:::::r::r.?!?:?%::�:•:Y.?:1:?:::::.: 1171 ,. : .;':' ':' ' ;! r•:•:v:x.;;:: r::i?!{+.+.{?????:::iv::?iv:4;?::::!?:::i{?!{•:?{?•::::..........1 f.:?i,{'++!!+1x11+.?i:.??.•:{•:;1:??x77:{1•:: ..........1.......... 1111. ..1..:......1i:..1,........1 .................. ...i1.11.. 1111.. 1171..7177.:1111:::1117..:..:11..........11........1......1,...........:..::::;., .., „ . ::::: � •:. !�::::•::4:•::.!;:i?:;v;.•:;..•:.�•:.....:........................ 1111...;....:...::...1.......1. .....+... .+. .1 1..1.......... 1111 .. � � .. .. ... 1111.....1.........1.:.....1.. .............1...111...1..........1.....1111.. . 1111... ...........1 1111...1111..1.....1117......v:.:..r.::::....+1.777:•1771 �.................. .. .� .� ' .. .1:.11....................1...........................1...1.. ............1..............................r.,.•.;..1111. ...............1.........n.. .1.....................11..............:::?:{.i:ti;•::!:.:::•:.iii::.}•:.;.�::.........:..........., ., 1111 r' 771:. :: �;� •::!? �...1..11.................:...............1.......:....................1.1.....1......1.:.............1::....:....:::::.:.� •:.v::::�:�:.v::::::;:::;.v:i:..:::•7 w:x:::.:v::•:::v.v::::::::::1:::::.?•::::::�:::•::::•.v::::::•::•::•:??�:•:::::.;:.:.:::::.:'•, :: ...., 5 1111.: :: : 1117.. ... v:v':;w:::::;..:::;i..•v:::::.�:::::••.�: ...:w:v••;:.:::..:•v::::�:1771�::::::••v:: :�;.:�,1;.:.,;...;...::/.T.:..............1.....V.... . ............ .. 17:.4:1 .1.11.. 1++1..11;.: 1;.1.11111 +1.1�: ??77 {:r:,1::;;::.+.:+.?•:::::::!•::1v:::::+.•:ew: 7777 1::+.;s.:1;+:.x+:r;;.::::::::::1:::::i: ?•:{iiii: iliiii;.+1?• 777 h:. ilgiiiiiii 1 iimi::1v71:::i$ii::::x+:1�ilo ::m:iiiiii 7!•777:.•; :•::::1::v:::::;:::•:;:xii .. ., '. :i: ''.V 4 1 :"'•:•:!•:::?• :i:•::•:::!•:::•:i:::::•:::.::!•::4'F• 177!7:• .: •:::::.;;•:::^;:::;?:::::::^::•::!i?•:::'::•:::{•:• :.::+.•:4i:3::•::•i:•i:•i '{•::J::•i:+,!•:::;vi;::!•::L::!•:i;•:•;:•:i::•::!•::•:•:::;5:?•::•:::;•:i:;•:•:::•::•::'•::•i:•771::•i::�}:•::::•::•:?•::•?;i:•;•:•i:::•::::•:1:•::'ii::::: ': : :.:�:�� :. .........1.1111.1111 .. ... ................1.. 1...:1..;.7771 ::::;7777 x::::::.v::x:.v:::x:;::x;:::::;.'::x.:v::.w: ::7777 x: ::::7777 7177.�::v:::7.:. �.''�. 1111, ., ';. 1111.......� .�� .��.1.........:... ... .:........1..............11..... ...........1.1...1........1........................1.....: 1171.....1..1......................................................1..................................1............. .. �,•. LIE..1111 ........ 1111.;•..:1.......::•.�:......::.. ..,:.. 1111:. �••1.:;.:.:..'.::?:1 i:;:::::•:1i:::'•':ryY1:1':i"; 111 1 1 .. r1ltliad :"e i':: i`>>:>'>: >::> >.: >< :i< ; :< :'<:>'::> :>>«: <{•>:?;:»?< 7777';?: s>:>:iii:<::: i:<:s< i>i:> < :<: <s:<: ;'•'<:`: < <' <::> >: >>:>; :: : 1 11: i 1 ': . : 111..... .1117?•:y?•::::.:r1;: iii•:::!?y< :::r. ,??!!,,,, :, :??y!:h::;r;;::1; :::•::;::<..:. 1111 �` ....................W.W..�..�....�.....� .....Sd!r 1111 ....... . ........1. .._.....,. 1111. .. ..........W.. .�.................W.................,,....:�0.::...,.......11 .. .. 1 ...........1..1.....,...1.1..............1........1....1.....1....1.11..1.......1.........1...1....:•1...:.;::.::::.:.,... .,,:':.. is Hours: 0 0 765 0 0 0 0 0 765 ... 11 . wJ $651025.00 0.00 } ' ::i15' G: #ilwwf •:::r•:�l »:j: l ; i : :/ 'tiDirec +::•it1abo $0:s.•.:.•y..?•: +.vvh? r ? Y.r.at•n+.r{ :.1?r.+.•r.!?,x•7!1'1'iYY:S::iJ:fr:•1;x...,..:,+/ 1,., 7:v hs+ ,viiii.#1wi 'ilfliG:•'r::''' 4irilu:y;::Yuii}it4vr. Direct Labor Totals: Hours: 0 0 939 0 0 0 0 0 839,..'1.1 Dollars: 0 0.00 79 815.00 0.00 0 0 0( 0 $ 78 815.00 ::{••::{•};;.i•:: :,, iiiiiigiii: .iiiii••r1•:.:::y;:.>•1i••{1;!:.,:•:•.}i.,.;1;...{.x::1,1::•::r. . ..,.}•..,yv.::Y.;x11,..1 r .r:.i;iv{.'•11';'1'1"'v r .r . :1:.�i#. .{. :.x111{�:•: a..•}.+h ••.vi .. :...y+1 a•1h::•iiii ii Fi.•rr,; 'ii'Ii'iiil'ii1>%1 iY:%Iii<i1::':%A r:. ::s_iiiii'•.'•'3•'�':i�3�S'ri3%'i;i:%'i :?{:",•:':,•:+•y:y::,.isr!isii::i':::':::ri;::ic:«?;7717:.::or ... , i. r... w:i ... ri: ::. rf .. .{{+„+•yrii.•.:.'•ih h�>.•.+Y::.•:r1....vr:irv:33}:%•:}•is21.•r+.•:rx:,:•.�+Yhr{.ar53:<:ii•:%sii.•:iiii.:'{.{yi%,^.{•v3/.awyr:i>✓.�fki:. r :e�iiy r , r rr rr1 r>.+r.r Direct Salary Cost: s i!„ 79 91j5 OG: Per Parcel Breakdown: Direct Labor Rate: `:%rjj ;`i`':. i; Audited Overhead Rate: Profit: Composite Multiplier: 'Total Labor Fee: $ 79,815.00 Expenses: ';;$ 1410040.Review Appraisals(23) x << < : 0OOAppraisals(22) Mileage/Travel $>`'; ii %;1 41 0 ! Reprographic,Copy,&Printing ;>« { lS;i, ;;. Couriex Overnight Postage ;; i19+ ;i0:: Subtotal: $ 90,925.00 "TOTAL $ 170,740.00 Abeyta Associates 4/12/2008 Pagel Exhibit G-2 Shannon & Wilson, Inc. Overhead Schedule *4000 December 31, 2005 Amount per Accepted GIL Adj. Ref. Amount % Direct Labor Base $7,729,532 $7,729,532 Fringe Benefits Retirement Fund/Profit Sharing 1,104,754 1,104,754 14.29% Vacation,Holiday,Sick 1,399,386 1,399,386 18.10% Payroll Tax Expense 2,475,784 (99,850) A 2,375,934 30.74% Total Fringe Benefits $4,979,924 ($99,850) $4,880,074 63.14% General Overhead Expenses Administrative Salaries $2,375,594 ($616) B $2,374,978 30.73% Additional Compensation $1,733,744 $1,733,744 22.43% Bus.Dev/Proposal Labor 1,775,410 (119,276) C 1,656,134 21.43% Hazardous Waste Expense 17,613 (2,940) D 14,673 0.19% Rent 1,326,244 (41,969) E 1,284,275 16.62% Travel&Auto Expense 140,580 (1,477) F 139,103 1.80% Business Dev. &Proposal 450,467 (240,178) G 210,289 2.72% Interest 17,161 (17,161) H 0 0.00% Supplies 408,645 408,645 5.29% *441.1 Professional/Tech Services 479,324 (18,155) J 461,169 5.97% Computer Expenses 332,636 332,636 4.30% Telephone&Postage 216,471 216,471 2.80% Conferences& Seminars 377,289 (5,912) K 371,377 4.80% Depreciation&Amortization 309,883 309,883 4.01% Insurance 470,769 470,769 6.09% Taxes&Licenses 1,194,297 (726,375) L 467,922 6.05% Bad Debts 69,313 (69,313) M 0 0.00% Total General Overhead Expenses $11,695,440 ($1,243,372) $10,452,068 135.22% Total Overhead Expenses $16,675,364 ($1,343,222) $15,332,142 198.36% Overhead Rate 215.74% 198.36% Reviewed-&Adjusted byS-& W's-CFA-firm=Voldal-Wartelle-&Ca— Shannon& Wilson-Reviewed&Accepted 3/29/06 MR References A Taxes and benefits related to unallowable promotion costs unallowable per 48 CFR 31.201-6(d). B Labor costs related to collection of bad debts unallowable per 48 CFR 31.201-6(d).($616.) C Advertising and public relations unallowable per 48 CFR 31.205-1. Niod Page 3 • Exhibit G-2 New, Mirai Associates Inc. Overhead Schedule 2005 Stated Mirai Accepted Description Amount Adj. Ref. Amount % Direct Labor Base $878,444.80 $ (37.60) J $878,407.20 Overhead Costs Indirect Labor $444,542.19 ($19.03) J $444,523.16 50.61% Bonuses 44,550.00 $44,550.00 5.07% Auto/Local Travel 6,376.30 $6,376.30 0.73% Bank Service Charges 132.00 $132.00 0.02% Business Lunches 4,935.30 (1,233.83) A $3,701.48 0.42% Computer Software 9,145.16 $9,145.16 1.04% Computer Hardware 6,444.91 $6,444.91 0.73% Depredation 12,175.00 $12,175.00 1.39% Dues and Subscriptions 1,617.30 $1,617.30 0.18% Health Club Expenses 4,508.75 $4,508.75 0.51% Dental&Life Insurance 14,782.65 B $14,782.65 1.68% Medical Insurance 84,642.15 12,580.20 C $97,222.35 11.07% Unemployment Insurance 7,830.10 $7,830.10 0.89% Worker's Comp Insurance 3,022.01 $3,022.01 0.34% Liability Insurance 15,987.49 $15,987.49 1.82% Internet Service 2,729.48 $2,729.48 0.31% Licenses and Permits 1,047.75 $1,047.75 0.12% Retirement Admin Fees . 2,975.00 $2,975.00 0.34% Retirement Contributions 40,349.25 $40,349.25 4.59% Recruitment Expenses 1,881.29 $1,881.29 0.21% Office Furniture 15,789.24 $15,789.24 1.80% Office Supplies 14,780.28 $14,780.28 1.68% Payroll Taxes 92,375.07 $92,375.07 10.52% Postage and Delivery 2,352.95 $2,352.95 0.27% Printing/Reproduction 10,018.28 $10,018.28 1.14% Professional Services 28,005.63 (6,078.00) D $21,927.63 2.50% Professional Societies 13,226.59 $13,226.59 1.51% Refund 5,000.00 (5,000.00) E $0.00 0.00% Rent 122,852.60 $122,852.60 13.99% Repairs 0.00 $0.00 0.00% Federal Unemployment Taxes 1,392.20 $1,392.20 0.16% Local Cities Taxes 2,051.48 $2,051.48 0.23% Property Tax 558.78 $558.78 0.06% State Business/Occupation Tax 31,662.78 $31,662.78 3.60% State Use Tax 138.86 $138.86 0.02% Telephone 12,619.48 $12,619.48 1.44% Employee Training 6,608.25 $6,608.25 0.75% Employee Reloacation Assistance 1,667.78 $1,667.78 0.19% Meals 1,890.49 $1,890.49 0.22% Transportation 4,867.12 $4,867.12 0.55% - ---- --- .Ye __ - -- -- _ -- -- 4409.88- -1990-.56)- F-----$3;419:32 - 0:39% Entertainment 5,106.79 (4,656.79) G $450.00 0.05% Marketing 402.37 (402.37) H $0.00 0.00% Contributions 2,130.00 (2,130.00) I $0.00 0.00% Total Overhead Costs $1,089,580.98 -$7,930.37 $1,081,650.61 123.14% Overhead Rate 123.14% EXHIBIT G-2 ' Prelim Widener & Associates 2004 BREAKDOWN OF OVERHEAD COST 07/14/05 Direct Labor $211,772 %of Direct Labor FRINGE BENEFITS Holiday pay $5,760 2.72% Vacation $11,520 5.44% Sick Pay $0 0.00% Payroll Taxes $4,829 2.28% Insurance-Health $6,711 3.17% Pension plan $17,500 8.26% Profit sharing plan $1,750 0.83% Total Fringe Benefits $48,069 22.70% GENERATED OVERHEAD Indirect salaries $67,986 32% Payroll Taxes $34,989 17% Insurance-Professional liability $6,156 3% Insurance-other $6,920 3% Computer expense $86 0% Direct Cost Reimbursements -$33,890 -16% Travel expense $18,987 9% Employee Per Diem $1,000 0% Relocation expense $0 0% Office Supplies $4,320 2% Office rent and utilities $6,900 3% Field Supplies $459 0% Professional Services $29,462 14% General office expenses $6,130 3% Telephone $11,425 5% Vehicle Repair& Maintenance $15,080 7% Taws=State Business&Occupatioit 112,748 Depreciation $75,072 35% Cost of Money $6,361 3% Total Generated Overhead $270,193 95% Total Overhead(Fringe+Generated) $318,262 95.48% Overhead Rate(Total Overhead/Direct Labor) 150% EXHIBIT G-2 BHC CONSULTANTS, LLC BREAKDOWN OF OVERHEAD COSTS Niaw (Provisional Rate FY Ending March 31,2007) Direct Labor(Billable Base) A 1,270,195 General &Administrative Expenses Indirect Salaries B 659,369 Payroll Burden Payroll Taxes 204,104 Health & Life Insurance Program 156,000 Worker's Compensation - • Performance Bonus 111,478 Profit Sharing - Retirement& Pension 72,359 Vacation, Holiday, Sick 92,767 Other Employee Benefits 3,120 Total Payroll Burden C 639,828 31.5% Other General&Administrative Expenses Temporary Personnel 2,000 Legal&Accounting 32,000 Facilities(Occupancy) 234,840 Communications 49,500 Professional Development 35,600 Personnel 15,500 Business Development 44,000 Travel&Subsistence 12,300 Printing&Reproduction 3,500 Vehicle Expense 14,700 Office Supplies 25,400 Library 3,000 Computer&Software Expense 46,525 Business Licenses 2,500 Taxes Other Than Income 69,491 Insurance Expense 95,872 Contributions - Depreciation 124,919 General &Administrative Other 85,400 Total General&Administrative Expenses D 897,047 Unallowable Costs Trade Shows&Advertising (3,000) Travel-Unallowable (1,000) Bank Charges (5,000) — — — Key Man Life Insurance — — (13,372) Contributions - Fines & Penalties - Total Unallowable Costs E (22,372) Total Allowable Costs(B+C+D-E) F 2,173,872 Facility Capital Cost of Money @ 1.44% G 18,291 (Direct Labor) Overhead Rate(F+G+H/A) 173% EXHIBIT G-2 DMJM+HARRIS INC. SCHEDULE OF BURDEN, FRINGE AND OVERHEAD COSTS FISCAL YEAR ENDED 9/30/2006 Projected (Dollars in Thousands) U.S U.S HOME FIELD OFFICE OFFICE DIRECT LABOR 73,100 47,500 PAYROLL BURDEN AND FRINGE VACATION,SICK LEAVE&HOLIDAY 11,071 7,249 PAYROLL TAX EXPENSE 7,782 5,095 WORKERS COMPENSATION 679 444 GROUP INSURANCE EXPENSE 6,674 4,370 INCENTIVE COMPENSATION 1,674 1,096 PENSION EXPENSE 4,120 2,698 ESOP 288 189 OTHER EMPLOYEE BENEFITS 867 568 TOTAL(36%) 33,155 21,708 INDIRECT/OVERHEAD LABOR 19,000 12,800 Nord INDIRECT/OVERHEAD NON LABOR OFFICE RENT AND OCCUPANCY COSTS 14,845 2,471 EQUIPMENT RENTS&LEASES 4,579 1,348 INSURANCE 2,159 1,360 AUDIT AND PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 3,538 1,402 HOME OFFICE ALLOCATIONS 7,957 5,422 STATE AND LOCAL INCOME TAXES 628 423 DEPRECIATION AND AMORTIZATION 1,753 382 OFFICE SUPPLIES 1,680 386 TRAVEL AND LIVING ALLOWANCES 5,191 1,872 COMMUNICATIONS 1,996 597 EMPLOYEE RELOCATION 836 249 REPRODUCTION 782 151 LICENSES AND REGISTRATIONS 612 101 MEMBERSHIPS AND SUBSCRIPTIONS 657 234 SEMINARS AND TRAINING 577 344 t CRUZ' NG 519 f25- -- RECOVERIES AND MISCELLANEOUS 1,145 (1,028) TOTAL 49,453 15,841 TOTAL INDIRECT/OVERHEAD COSTS 101,608 50,350 NIS INDIRECT/OVERHEAD COST RATE 139.00% 106.00% Exhibit H fir✓ Title VI Assurances During the performance of this AGREEMENT,the CONSULTANT,for itself,its assignees,and successors in interest agrees as follows: 1. Compliance with Regulations:The CONSULTANT shall comply with the Regulations relative to non-discrimination in federally assisted programs of the AGENCY,Title 49,Code of Federal Regulations, Part 21,as they may be amended from time to time(hereinafter referred to as the"REGULATIONS"),which are herein incorporated by reference and made a part of this AGREEMENT. 2. Non-discrimination:The CONSULTANT,with regard to the work performed during the AGREEMENT,shall not discriminate on the grounds of race,color,sex,or national origin in the selection and retention of sub-consultants,including procurement of materials and leases of equipment.The CONSULTANT shall not participate either directly or indirectly in the discrimination prohibited by Section 21.5 of the REGULATIONS,including employment practices when the AGREEMENT covers a program set forth in Appendix B of the REGULATIONS. 3. Solicitations for Sub-consultants,Including Procurement of Materials and Equipment:In all solicitations either by competitive bidding or negotiations made by the CONSULTANT for work to be performed under a sub-contract,including procurement of materials or leases of equipment,each potential sub-consultant or supplier shall be notified by the CONSULTANT of the CONSULTANT'S obligations under this AGREEMENT and the REGULATIONS relative to non-discrimination on the grounds of race,color,sex,or national origin. sow4. Information and Reports: The CONSULTANT shall provide all information and reports required by the REGULATIONS or directives issued pursuant thereto,and shall permit access to its books,records,accounts, other sources of information,and its facilities as may be determined by AGENCY,STATE or the Federal Highway Administration(FHWA)to be pertinent to ascertain compliance with such REGULATIONS,orders and instructions. Where any information required of a CONSULTANT is in the exclusive possession of another who fails or refuses to furnish this information,the CONSULTANT shall so certify to the AGENCY, STATE or the FHWA as appropriate,and shall set forth what efforts it has made to obtain the information. 5. Sanctions for Non-compliance: In the event of the CONSULTANT'S non-compliance with the non-discrimination provisions of this AGREEMENT,the AGENCY shall impose such AGREEMENT sanctions as it,the STATE or the FHWA may determine to be appropriate,including,but not limited to: • Withholding of payments to the CONSULTANT under the AGREEMENT until the CONSULTANT complies,and/or; • Cancellation,termination,or suspension of the AGREEMENT,in whole or in part slow DOT Form 140-089 EF Exhibit H Revised 6/05 6. Incorporation of Provisions:The CONSULTANT shall include the provisions of paragraphs(1)through(5)in every sub-contract,including procurement of materials and leases of equipment,unless exempt by the REGULATIONS,or directives issued pursuant thereto.The CONSULTANT shall take such action withNome respect to any sub-consultant or procurement as the AGENCY,STATE or FHWA may direct as a means of enforcing such provisions including sanctions for non-compliance. Provided,however,that in the event a CONSULTANT becomes involved in,or is threatened with,litigation with a sub-consultant or supplier as a result of such direction,the CONSULTANT may request the AGENCY and the STATE enter into such litigation to protect the interests of the AGENCY and the STATE and,in addition,the CONSULTANT may request the United States enter into such litigation to protect the interests of the United States. Exhibit I __44kaw, Payment Upon Termination of Agreement By the Agency Other Than for Fault of the Consultant (Refer to Agreement, Section IX) Lump Sum Contracts A final payment shall be made to the CONSULTANT which when added to any payments previously made shall total the same percentage of the Lump Sum Amount as the work completed at the time of termination is to the total work required for the PROJECT.In addition,the CONSULTANT shall be paid for any authorized extra work completed. Cost Plus Fixed Fee Contracts A final payment shall be made to the CONSULTANT which when added to any payments previously made,shall total the actual costs plus the same percentage of the fixed fee as the work completed at the time of termination is to the total work required for the Project. In addition,the CONSULTANT shall be paid for any authorized extra work completed. Specific Rates of Pay Contracts A fmal payment shall be made to the CONSULTANT for actual hours charged at the time of termination of this AGREEMENT plus any direct nonsalary costs incurred at the time of termination of this AGREEMENT. Cost Per Unit of Work Contracts A final payment shall be made to the CONSULTANT for actual units of work completed at the time of termination of this AGREEMENT. Nimmw DOT Form 140-089 EF Exhibit I Revised 6/05 Exhibit J Alleged Consultant Design Error Procedures Ned The purpose of this exhibit is to establish a procedure to determine if a consultant's alleged design error is of a nature that exceeds the accepted standard of care.In addition,it will establish a uniform method for the resolution and/or cost recovery procedures in those instances where the agency believes it has suffered some material damage due to the alleged error by the consultant. Step 1—Potential Consultant Design Error(s)is Identified by Agency's Project Manager At the first indication of potential consultant design error(s),the first step in the process is for the Agency's project manager to notify the Director of Public Works or Agency Engineer regarding the potential design error(s).For federally funded projects,the Region Highways and Local Programs Engineer should be informed and involved in these procedures.(Note:The Director of Public Works or Agency Engineer may appoint an agency staff person other than the project manager,who has not been as directly involved in the project,to be responsible for the remaining steps in these procedures.) Step 2-Project Manager Documents the Alleged Consultant Design Error(s) After discussion of the alleged design error(s)and the magnitude of the alleged error(s),and with the Director of Public Works or Agency Engineer's concurrence,the project manager obtains more detailed documentation than is normally required on the project.Examples include:all decisions and descriptions of work;photographs,records of labor,materials and equipment. Step 3—Contact the Consultant Regarding the Alleged Design Error(s) Ned If it is determined that there is a need to proceed further,the next step in the process is for the project manager to contact the consultant regarding the alleged design error(s)and the magnitude of the alleged error(s).The project manager and other appropriate agency staff should represent the agency and the consultant should be represented by their project manger and any personnel(including sub-consultants) deemed appropriate for the alleged design error(s)issue. Step 4—Attempt to Resolve Alleged Design Error with Consultant After the meeting(s)with the consultant have been completed regarding the consultant's alleged design error(s),there are three possible scenarios: • It is determined via mutual agreement that there is not a consultant design error(s).If this is the case,then the process will not proceed beyond this point. • It is determined via mutual agreement that a consultant design error(s)occurred.If this is the case,then the Director of Public Works or Agency Engineer,or their representatives,negotiate a settlement with the consultant.The settlement would be paid to the agency or the amount would be reduced from the consultant's agreement with the agency for the services on the project in which the design error took place.The agency is to provide H&LP,through the Region DOT Form 140-089 EF Exhibit J Revised 6/05 • Local Programs Engineer,a summary of the settlement for review and to make adjustments,if any,as to how the settlement affects federal reimbursements.No 'err•° further action is required. • There is not a mutual agreement regarding the alleged consultant design error(s). The consultant may request that the alleged design error(s)issue be forwarded to the Director of Public Works or Agency Engineer for review.If the Director of Public Works or Agency Engineer,after review with their legal counsel,is not able to reach mutual agreement with the consultant,proceed to Step 5. Step 5—Forward Documents to Highways and Local Programs For federally funded projects all available information,including costs,should be forwarded through the Region Highways and Local Programs Engineer to H&LP for their review and consultation with the FHWA.H&LP will meet with representatives of the agency and the consultant to review the alleged design error(s),and attempt to fmd a resolution to the issue.If necessary,H&LP will request assistance from the Attorney General's Office for legal interpretation.H&LP will also identify how the alleged error(s)affects eligibility of project costs for federal reimbursement. • If mutual agreement is reached,the agency and consultant adjust the scope of work and costs to reflect the agreed upon resolution.H&LP,in consultation with FHWA, will identify the amount of federal participation in the agreed upon resolution of the issue. • If mutual agreement is not reached,the agency and consultant may seek settlement by arbitration or by litigation. `fire Exhibit K Consultant Claim Procedures The purpose of this exhibit is to describe a procedure regarding claim(s)on a consultant agreement.The following procedures should only be utilized on consultant claims greater than$1,000.If the consultant's claim(s)are a total of $1,000 or less,it would not be cost effective to proceed through the outlined steps.It is suggested that the Director of Public Works yr Agency Engineer negotiate a fair and reasonable price for the consultant's claim(s)that total$1,000 or less. This exhibit will outline the procedures to be followed by the consultant and the agency to consider a potential claim by the consultant. Step 1—Consultant Files a Claim with the Agency Project Manager If the consultant determines that they were requested to perform additional services that were outside of the agreement's scope of work,they maybe entitled to a claim.The first step that must be completed is the request for consideration of the claim to the Agency's project manager. The consultant's claim must outline the following: • Summation of hours by classification for each firm that is included in the claim; • Any correspondence that directed the consultant to perform the additional work; • Timeframe of the additional work that was outside of the project scope; • Summary of direct labor dollars,overhead costs,profit and reimbursable costs associated with the additional work;and • Explanation as to why the consultant believes the additional work was outside of the agreement scope of work. Step 2—Review by Agency Personnel Regarding the Consultant's Claim for Additional Compensation After the consultant has completed step 1,the next step in the process is to forward the request to the Agency's project manager.The project manager will review the consultant's claim and will met with the Director of Public Works or Agency Engineer to determine if the Agency agrees with the claim.If the FHWA is participating in the project's funding,forward a copy of the consultant's claim and the Agency's recommendation for federal participation in the claim to the WSDOT Highways and Local Programs through the Region Local Programs Engineer.If the claim is not eligible for federal participation,payment will need to be from agency funds. If the Agency project manager,Director of Public Works or Agency Engineer,WSDOT Highways and Local-Programs(ifapphcable),,and-FHWA(if applicable)agree wi eco S cl—aun,send a request memo,including backup documentation to the consultant to either supplement the agreement,or create a new agreement for the claim.After the request has been approved,the Agency shall write the supplement and/or new agreement and pay the consultant the amount of the claim.Inform the consultant that the final payment for the agreement is subject to audit.No further action in needed regarding the claim procedures. ,4100 DOT Form 140-089 EF Exhibit K Revised 6/05 If the Agency does not agree with the consultant's claim,proceed to step 3 of the procedures. Step 3—Preparation of Support Documentation Regarding Consultant's Claim(s) If the Agency does not agree with the consultant's claim,the project manager shall prepare a summary for the Director of Public Works or Agency Engineer that included the following: • Copy of information supplied by the consultant regarding the claim; • Agency's summation of hours by classification for each firm that should be included in the claim; • Any correspondence that directed the consultant to perform the additional work; • Agency's summary of direct labor dollars,overhead costs,profit and reimbursable costs associated with the additional work; • Explanation regarding those areas in which the Agency does/does not agree with the consultant's claim(s); • Explanation to describe what has been instituted to preclude future consultant claim(s);and • Recommendations to resolve the claim. • Step 4—Director of Public Works or Agency Engineer Reviews Consultant Claim and Agency Documentation Noire The Director of Pubic Works or Agency Engineer shall review and administratively approve or disapprove the claim,or portions thereof,which may include getting Agency Council or Commission approval(as appropriate to agency dispute resolution procedures).If the project involves federal participation,obtain concurrence from WSDOT Highways and Local Programs and FHWA regarding final settlement of the claim.If the claim is not eligible for federal participation,payment will need to be from agency funds. Step 5—Informing Consultant of Decision Regarding the Claim The Director of Public Works or Agency Engineer shall notify(in writing)the consultant of their final decision regarding the consultant's claim(s). Include the final dollar amount of the accepted claim(s) and rationale utilized for the decision. Step 6—Preparation of Supplement or New Agreement for the Consultant's Claim(s) The agency shall write the supplement and/or new agreement and pay the consultant the amount of the claim.Inform the consultant that the final payment for the agreement is subject to audit. Nape. Exhibit M-1(a) Certification Of Consultant Project No. Local Agency Renton I hereby certify that I am a principal and duly authorized representative of the firm of KPG,Inc. whose address is 753 9th Avenue N, Seattle, WA 98109 and that neither I nor the above firm I here represent has: (a) Employed or retained for a commission, percentage,brokerage,contingent fee,or other consideration,any firm or person(other than a bona fide employee working solely for me or the above CONSULTANT)to solicit or secure the AGREEMENT; (b) Agreed, as an express or implied condition for obtaining this contract,to employ or retain the services of any firm or person in connection with carrying out this AGREEMENT;or (c) Paid,or agreed to pay,to any firm, organization or person(other than a bona fide employee working solely for me or the above CONSULTANT)any fee,contribution,donation,or consideration of any kind for,or in connection with,procuring or carrying out this AGREEMENT; except as hereby expressly stated(if any); I acknowledge that this certificate is to be available to the Washington State Department of Transportation and the Federal Highway Administration,U.S. Department of . sportation in connection with this AGREEMENT involving participation of Federal-ail lay fu•.s, subject to applicable State and Federal laws, both criminal and civil. Nritoi • / / L 06 r J Date07nature "441004 DOT Form 140-089 EF Exhibit M-1(a) Revised 6/05 Exhibit M-1(b) Certification Of Agency Official 141.0, I hereby certify that I am the AGENCY Official of the Local Agency of Renton Washington,and that the consulting firm or its representative has not been required,directly or indirectly as an express or implied condition in connection with obtaining or carrying out this AGREEMENT to: (a) Employ or retain,or agree to employ to retain, any firm or person;or (b) Pay,or agree to pay,to any firm,person,or organization, any fee,contribution, donation,or consideration of any kind;except as hereby expressly stated(if any): I acknowledge that this certificate is to be available to the Washington State Department of Transportation and the Federal Highway Administration,U.S. Department of Transportation, in connection with this AGREEMENT involving participation of Federal-aid highway funds, and is • subject to applicable State and Federal laws,both criminal and civil. Date Signature "�Ilrr►° '411rrr` DOT Form 140-089 EF Exhibit M-1(b) Revised 6/05 • Exhibit M-2 Certification Regarding Debarment, Suspension, and Other Responsibility Matters-Primary Covered Transactions The prospective primary participant certifies to the best of its knowledge and belief,that it and its principals: A. Are not presently debarred, suspended,proposed for debarment, declared ineligible,or voluntarily excluded from covered transactions by any federal department or agency; B. Have not within a three-year period preceding this proposal been convicted of or had a civil judgment rendered against them for commission or fraud or a criminal offense in connection with obtaining,attempting to obtain, or performing a public(federal, state, or local)transaction or contract under a public transaction; violation of federal or state antitrust statues or commission of embezzlement,theft, forgery, bribery,falsification or destruction of records,making false statements,or receiving stolen property; C. Are not presently indicted for or otherwise criminally or civilly charged by a governmental entity (federal,state,or local)with commission of any of the offenses enumerated in paragraph(I)(B). of this certification;and D. Have not within a three(3)year period preceding this application/proposal had one or more public transactions(federal, state,or local)terminated for cause or default. II. Where the prospective primary participant is unable to certify to any of the statements in this certification, such prospective participant shall attach an explanation to this proposal. Consultant(Firm): KPG,Inc. L (Da ) (Sign:to -)Pre-!.ent or?!thorized •1j'al of Consultant J / *411111.1 DOT Form 140-089 EF Exhibit M-2 Revised 6/05 Exhibit M-3 Certification Regarding The Restrictions of The use of Federal Funds for Lobbying The prospective participant certifies, by signing and submitting this bid or proposal,to the best of his or her knowledge and belief,that: 1. No federal appropriated funds have been paid or will be paid, by or on behalf of the undersigned, to any person for influencing or attempting to influence an officer or employee of any Federal agency, a member of Congress,an officer or employee of Congress,or an employee of a member of Congress in connection with the awarding of any Federal contract,the making of any Federal grant, the making of any Federal loan, the entering into of any cooperative agreement, and the extension, continuation,renewal, amendment,or modification of any Federal contract,grant, loan, or cooperative agreement. 2. If any funds other than Federal appropriated funds have been paid or will be paid to any person for influencing or attempting to influence an officer or employee of any Federal agency, a member of Congress,an officer or employee of Congress,or an employee of a member of Congress in connection with this Federal contract,grant, loan,or cooperative agreement,the undersigned shall complete and submit Standard Form-LLL, "Disclosure Form to Report Lobbying," in accordance with its instructions. This certification is a material representation of fact upon which reliance was placed when this transaction was made or entered into. Submission of this certification is a prerequisite for making or entering into this transaction imposed by Section 1352,Title 31,U.S. Code. Any person who fails to file the required certification shall be subject to a civil penalty of not less than$10,000 and `44'"" not more than$100,000 for each such failure. The prospective participant also agrees by submitting his or her bid or proposal that he or she shall require that the language of this certification be included in all lower tier subcontracts which exceed $100,000 and that all such subrecipients shall certify and disclose accordingly. Consultant(Firm): KPG,Inc. f / • (Date) (Sign ure)Pr dent or • Ahorized Official of Consultant DOT Form 140-089 EF Exhibit M-3 Revised 6/05 Exhibit M-4 Certificate of Current Cost or Pricing Data This is to certify that,to the best of my knowledge and belief,the cost or pricing data(as defined in section 15.401 of the Federal Acquisition Regulation(FAR)and required under FAR subsection 15.403-4) submitted,either actually or by specific identification in writing,to the contracting officer or to the contracting officer's representative in support of Rainier Ave/Hardie Ave Transit Improvement * are accurate,complete,and current as of January 1,2006 **.This certification includes the cost or pricing data supporting any advance agreements and forward pricing rate agreements between the offeror and the Government that are part of the proposal. Finn KPG, Inc. Name P. Joseph Giacoba77i Title Principal Date of Execution*** 4/ j L/C`C * Identify the proposal,quotation, request for price adjustment,or other submission involved, giving the appropriate identifying number(e.g.,RFP No.). ** Insert the day,month,and year when price negotiations were concluded and price agreement , osil was reached. *** Insert the day,month, and year of signing,which should be as close as practicable to the date when the price negotiations were concluded and the contract price was agreed to. ,410019 DOT Form 140-089 EF Exhibit M-4 Revised 6/05 ( ( ( • CITY OF RENTON • PLANNING/BUILDING/PUBLIC WORKS TRANSPORTATION SYSTEMS DIVISION 2006-2011 SIX-YEAR TIP Rainier Ave. Improvements -S 4th PI to S 2nd St Functional Classification: Principal&Minor Fund: 317 Proj.Length: 0.4 miles Proj: 12501 RANK: 7 CONTACT: Leslie Lahndt 425.430.7223 DESCRIPTION: STATUS: Rebuild sidewalks including curb and gutters;add pedestrian-scale illumination,bollards(at crossings), Anticipated design contract to be authorized in mid-to late 2005. Based upon staff transit facility improvements(shelters,benches,info kiosks),planted buffer strips and landscaped discussions,Sound Transit is anticipated to be a key funding partner. Funding shown in medians,and eastbound transit queue jump at S 3rd St. 2009-2011 will move to 2006-2008 pending MOU development with Sound Transit. JUSTIFICATION: CHANGES: Rainier Ave. is a critical corridor in central Renton with existing operational problems and in need of New project. Approximately$10,000 is required in 2005 to evaluate design options;the infrasructure enhancements to provide greater ease of non-motorized and transit-based travel. funding will be reallocated from the NE 4th St/Hoquiam Ave.project by Council process. Funding shown 2009-2011 will likely be spread over 2006-2012 pending Sound Transit Board approval of funds. j Funded :1 3,310,0001 Unfunded :1 3,000,000 Project Totals Programmed Pre-2006 Six Year Program ITEM Programmed Spent In 2004 2005 Total 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 EXPENSES: Project Development Precon Eng/Admin - 607,000, 10,000 597,000 597,000 R-O-W(includes Admin) 1,600,000 _ 1,600,000 1,600,000 Construction Contract Fee 3,800000 3,800,000 1,800,000 2,000,000 Construction Enq/Admin 303,000 303,000 143,000 160,000 Other TOTAL EXPENSES 6,310,000 10,000 6,300,000 2,197,000 1,943,000 2,160,000 SOURCES OF FUNDS: Vehicle Fuel Tax 110,000- 110,000 _ 110,000 Business License Fee 310,000 10,000 300,000 100,000 100,000 100,000 Proposed Fund Balance 1,443,000 1,443,000600 000 418,000 425,000 Grants In-Hand Mitigation In-Hand 1,447,000 1,447,000 - 497,000 425,000 525,000, Bonds/L.I.D.'s Formed Other In-Hand Grants Proposed _ , Mitigation Proposed _ L.I.D.'s Proposed , _ -Other Proposed(S.Transit) 3,000000, 3,000,000 1,000,000 1,000,000 1,000,000 Undetermined TOTAL SOURCES 6,310,000 10,000 6,300,000_ _ _ 2,1971000 1,943,000 2,160,000 aWwr ST 08/0312005 0.22 AM 5-7 FINAL CITY OF RENTON PLANNING/BUILDING/PUBLIC WORKS TRANSPORTATION SYSTEMS DIVISION 2006-2011 SIX-YEAR TIP Hardie Ave. SW Transit/Multimodal Improvements Functional Classification: Principal&Minor Fund: 317 Proj.Length: 0.7 miles Proj: 12502 RANK: 8 CONTACT: Leslie Lahndt 425.430.7223 DESCRIPTION: STATUS: Add Business Access Transit(BAT)lanes in both directions;rebuild the Hardie railroad bridge;add non- Design contract authorization anticipated mid-to late 2005. Based upon staff discussions, motorized facilities,i.e.,multimodal trail, northbound transit-only signal at Rainier and Hardie,and curb, Sound Transit is anticipated to be a key funding partner. Funding shown in 2009-2011 will gutter,and sidewalks between Sunset Blvd.and Rainier Ave.S. move to 2006-2008 pending MOU development with Sound Transit. JUSTIFICATION: CHANGES: Regional transit agencies have expressed a desire to partner with the City to design and build systematic New project. Approximately$190,000 is required in 2005 to evaluate design options;the transit improvements throughout Renton for the purposes of reducing travel times and improving speed funding will be reallocated from the NE 4th St/Hoquiam Ave.project by Council process. and reliability for routes serving Renton. Additionally,there is a need for improved non-motorized facilities Hardie Ave.SW will be changed from a Collector Arterial to a Minor Arterial. Funding providing north to south connections. There are also safety benefits for all by replacing the substandard shown 2009-2011 will likely be spread over 2006-2012 pending Sound Transit Board railroad bridge over Hardie south of SW 5th PI. approval of funds. I Funded :I 3.337,0001 Unfunded :I 12,000.000 Project Totals Programmed Pre-2006 Six Year Program ITEM Programmed Spent In 2004 2005 Total 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 EXPENSES: . Project Development Precon Eng/Admin 1,667,000 190,000 1,477,000 1,077,000 400,000 R-O-W(includes Admin) 2,423,000 2,423,000 1,500,000 923,000 Construction Contract Fee 10,413,000 10 413,000 4,413,000 6,000,000 Construction Eng/Admin 834,000 834,000 334,000 500,000 Other TOTAL EXPENSES 15,337,000 190,000 15,147,000 2,577,000 6,070,000 6,500,000 SOURCES OF FUNDS: Vehicle Fuel Tax 155,000 • 155,000 155,000 Business License Fee 465,000 465,000 200,000 100,000 165,000 Proposed Fund Balance 862,000 862,000 77,000 475,000 310,000 Grants In-Hand - Mitigation In-Hand 1,855,000 190,000 1,665,000 795,000 870,000 Bonds/L.I.D.'s Formed _ Other In-Hand Grants Proposed , Mitigation Proposed L.I.D.'s Proposed Other Proposed(S.Transit) 12,000,000 12,000,000 ' 2,300,000 4,700,000 5,000,000 Undetermined TOTAL SOURCES 15,337,000 190,000 15,147,000 2,577,000 6,070,000 6,500,000 Hardie 08/0Y2035 !/,AM 5-8 FINAL • .. (6.,... CITY OF RENTON COUNCIL AGENDA BILL I AI#: 61' Submitting Data: Planning/Building/Public Works For Agenda of: ✓ Dept/Div/Board.. Transportation Systems April 24, 2006 Staff Contact Sharon Griffin, x 7232 Agenda Status Consent X Subject: Public Hearing.. South Lake Washington Infrastructure Improvements - Correspondence.. Washington State Community, Trade and Economic Ordinance Development(CTED) Grant Resolution X Old Business Exhibits: New Business Issue Paper Study Sessions CTED Contract No. S06-76104-892 Information Signature Authorization Statement Resolution Grant Award Letter Six-Year 2006-2011 TIP Project Sheet Recommended Action: Approvals: Legal Dept X Council Concur Finance Dept X Fiscal Impact: Fund: 317.012306 Expenditure Required... $ 5,000,000 Total Transfer/Amendment Amount Budgeted 1 $10,875,000 1 Revenue Generated $ 5,000,000 Total Project Budget $23,377,000 City Share Total Project 2... $18,377,000 2 SUMMARY OF ACTION: The 2005 State Legislature appropriated$5 million to the City of Renton for the Infrastructure for the Renton Boeing Property Project. The funds are being administered by Washington State Community, Trade and Economic Development(CTED). The funds are specific to utility improvements and will be used on the South Lake Washington Infrastructure Improvements project. Construction is expected to start in July 2006. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Approve an agreement with Washington State Department of Community, Trade and Economic Development(CTED) and all subsequent CTED grant agreements necessary for a$5 million grant for utility improvements for the South Lake Washington Infrastructure Improvement project, and adopt the resolution authorizing the Mayor and City Clerk to sign the agreement. ' The total project budget of$23,377,000 is based on the estimate available during the development of the contract. The City is in the process of finalizing the budget for bonding. 2 The City share includes funding from sources other than CTED. �rtr✓` H:Trans/sgriffin/Agenda Bills/CTED Grant Contract �,`SY O,�i PLANNING/BUILDING/ • �s , PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT bkIL • •N� MEMORANDUM DATE: April 24, 2006 TO: Kathy Keolker, May,o FROM: \ Gregg ZimmermaH; anning/Building/Public Works Administrator STAFF CONTACT: Sharon Griffin, Transportation Program Development Coordinator(extension 7232) SUBJECT: South Lake Washington Infrastructure Improvements - Washington State Community, Trade and Economic Development (CTED) Contract ISSUE: Should the City of Renton sign the contract with Washington State Community, Trade, and Economic Development, Economic Development Division to obligate state funding for the utilities improvements on the South Lake Washington Infrastructure 4040, Improvements? RECOMMENDATION: Authorize the Mayor and City Clerk to: • Enter into agreement between the City of Renton and Washington State Community, Trade and Economic Development(CTED) for obligation of grant funding and all subsequent grant agreements necessary to accomplish this project; and, • Adopt the resolution. BACKGROUND: The 2005 State Legislature appropriated $5 million to the City of Renton for the infrastructure for the Renton Boeing Property Project. The Washington State Community, Trade and Economic Development (CTED) is administering the funds. The funds are specific to utility improvements and will be used on the South Lake Washington Infrastructure Improvements project. Construction is expected to start in July 2006. wow South Lake Washington Infrastructure Improvements April 24,2006 Page 2 Several items of note in the contract: • The City will be reimbursed on eligible expenditures from July 1, 2005 through the final invoice June 30, 2007,which must be submitted to CTED by July 6, 2007. If the City expects to go beyond this date, the grant funds would need to be re-appropriated to this project in the state's 2007-2009 biennial budget(see Contract,page 7 of 12, Section 26). • The City certifies that it has current expenditures or access to funds to complete this project(see Contract, page 10 of 12, Attachment B). • The City must identify the state as a partner on any project-related press release, sign or circulated communication(see Contract,page 5 of 12, Section 14). • After completion of the project,the City will provide updates on the economic impact of the project. These updates may include "private sector employment and investment activity resulting from the project" (see Contract,page 12 of 12, Attachment D). Attachments cc: Peter Hahn,Deputy PBPW Administrator-Transportation Sharon Griffin,Transportation Program Development Coordinator Rob Lochmiller,Transportation Project Manager Nancy Violante,FIS Grant Accountant Constance Brundage,Administrative Secretary *44010 H:\sgriffin\issue papers\IP CTED Grant Contract CONTRACT NO. S06-76104-892 WASHINGTON STATE COMMUNITY, TRADE AND ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT DIVISION 1. GRANT RECIPIENT: 2. AWARD DATE: 3. END DATE: City of Renton July 1, 2005 June 30, 2007 1055 South Grady Way, 5th Floor Renton, Washington 98055 4. GRANT RECIPIENT REPRESENTATIVE: 5. CTED REPRESENTATIVE: NAME: Sharon Griffin NAME: Matthew Ojennus PHONE: 425-430-7232 PHONE: 360-725-4047 FAX: 425-430-7376 FAX: 360-586-0873 E-MAIL: sgriffin@ci.renton.wa.us E-MAIL: matthewo@cted.wa.gov 6. SOURCE OF FUNDS: 7. TAX IDENTIFICATION NUMBER: State - $5,000,000 91-6001271 Total Project Cost- $23,377,000 8. SUMMARY: The City of Renton will complete the necessary utility improvements to redevelop District 1 of the Boeing redevelopment area; and construct the first phase of utilities, exclusive of roadway costs, for the South Lake Washington(Lakeshore Landing)project. The DEPARTMENT and GRANT RECIPIENT acknowledge and accept the terms of this CONTRACT and attachments and have executed this CONTRACT as of the date and year written below. The rights and obligations of both parties to this CONTRACT are governed by this CONTRACT and other documents incorporated by reference: CONTRACT Terms and Conditions including Attachment A: Scope of Work; '''''Attachment B: Certification of the Availability of Funds to Complete the Project; Attachment C: Budget; and Attachment D: Special Conditions. FOR THE DEPARTMENT: FOR THE GRANT RECIPIENT: Larry Williams, Director Kathy Keolker, Mayor Economic Development Division City of Renton DATE: DATE: APPROVED AS TO FORM ONLY: Sandra Adix (signature on file) Assistant Attorney General varDATE: October 3, 2005 S:\CEAC\Job Economic Development Grants\!Renton Project\Renton Contract- S06-76104-892.doc 1 of 12 CONTRACT NO. S06-76104-892 ' CONTRACT TERMS & CONDITIONS SECTION 1 -PREAMBLE This CONTRACT, entered into by the City of Renton, (hereinafter referred to as the GRANT RECIPIENT)and the Department of Community,Trade and Economic Development(hereinafter referred to as the DEPARTMENT), WITNESSES THAT: WHEREAS,the DEPARTMENT has the responsibility under RCW 43.330.050(5)to provide financial and technical assistance to the communities of the state,to assist in improving the delivery of federal, state, and local programs; and to provide communities with opportunities for productive and coordinated development beneficial to the well-being of communities and their residents; and WHEREAS,the DEPARTMENT is also given the responsibility to administer state funds and programs which are assigned to the DEPARTMENT by the Governor or the Washington State Legislature; and WHEREAS,the Washington State Legislature has, in Laws of 2005, Chapter 488, (Section 138), made an appropriation to fund Job/Economic Development Grants, and directed the DEPARTMENT to administer those funds;and WHEREAS,the appropriation language stipulates the GRANT RECIPIENT is eligible to receive funding for a specific infrastructure improvement project(a venture herein referred to as the PROJECT). THEREFORE,the parties mutually agree to the following terms and conditions: SECTION 2 - SCOPE OF WORK Over the course of the CONTRACT period, the GRANT RECIPIENT shall accomplish the activities described in Attachment"A": Scope of Work and is incorporated into the CONTRACT by reference. SECTION 3 -FUNDING The total funds to be reimbursed to the GRANT RECIPIENT for costs incurred during the CONTRACT period shall be a sum not to exceed $5,000,000. SECTION 4- CERTIFICATION OF FUNDS A. The release of state funds under this CONTRACT is contingent upon the GRANT RECIPIENT certifying that it has expended or has access to funds from other sources as set forth in Attachment"B": Certification of the Availability of Funds to Complete the Project and is incorporated into the CONTRACT by reference. Such sources may consist of a combination of any of the following: (1) Eligible project expenditures prior to the execution of this CONTRACT. (2) Cash dedicated to the PROJECT. (3) Funds available through a letter of credit or other binding loan commitment(s). (4) Pledges from foundations or corporations. (5) Pledges from individual donors. 2 of 12 CONTRACT NO. S06-76104-892 (6) The value of real property when acquired solely for the purposes of this PROJECT, as established and evidenced by a current market value appraisal performed by a licensed,professional real estate low appraiser, or current property tax statement. The DEPARTMENT will not consider appraisals for prospective values of such property for the purposes of calculating the amount of non-state matching fund credit. (7) In-kind contributions, subject to the DEPARTMENT'S approval. B. The GRANT RECIPIENT shall maintain records sufficient to evidence that it has access to or has expended funds from such non-state sources, and shall make such records available for the DEPARTMENT'S review upon reasonable request. SECTION 5 -BUDGET An approved budget by category of expenditure is included as Attachment"C": Budget of this CONTRACT and is incorporated into the CONTRACT by reference. The total amount of transfers of funds between line item budget categories shall be as specified in Attachment"C". If the cumulative amount of these transfers is expected to exceed the amount specified in Attachment"C",the total project budget shall be subject to justification and negotiation of a CONTRACT amendment by the GRANT RECIPIENT and the DEPARTMENT in advance of expenditure. SECTION 6 - CONTRACT PERIOD A. The effective date of this CONTRACT shall be the date all parties sign and complete execution of the CONTRACT. swrr B. Costs to be reimbursed by the DEPARTMENT under this CONTRACT are those eligible costs incurred during the performance of the CONTRACT work specified in Attachment"A"on or after July 1, 2005,the award date. SECTION 7 - REIMBURSEMENT PROVISIONS A. Funds will be disbursed on a reimbursement basis only. B. Only eligible project-related costs will be reimbursed. C. In order to obtain reimbursement,the GRANT RECIPIENT shall submit quarterly a current invoice voucher on a form provided by the DEPARTMENT, which identifies the costs incurred for work performed since the previous voucher was submitted. Documentation of expenses is not required with each invoice, but must be available upon request. The invoice must be submitted with a progress report as required in Section 9. D. Within twenty(20) days after receiving and approving the voucher, the DEPARTMENT shall remit to the GRANT RECIPIENT a warrant covering the DEPARTMENT'S share of the costs incurred for work performed, unless the claim is challenged by the DEPARTMENT. The final invoice voucher covering costs incurred for work performed on or before June 30, 2007, must be • r,,,, submitted by the GRANT RECIPIENT prior to July 6, 2007 to allow the DEPARTMENT sufficient time to process it. Payment of the final voucher shall be contingent upon the DEPARTMENT'S receipt and approval of any products or deliverables designated in Attachment"A". 3 of 12 CONTRACT NO. S06-76104-892 • SECTION 8 -EXPENDITURES ELIGIBLE FOR REIMBURSEMENT Ned The GRANT RECIPIENT may be reimbursed for PROJECT expenditures in the following cost categories: • Real property when purchased or acquired solely for the purposes of the PROJECT; • Design, engineering, architectural, and planning costs; • Project management costs (from external sources only); • Construction costs including, but not limited to,the following: - Site preparation and improvements; - Permits and fees; - Labor and materials; - Taxes on project goods and services; - Capitalized equipment; and - Landscaping. SECTION 9 -REPORTS A. The GRANT RECIPIENT shall submit a brief quarterly progress report on a form approved by the DEPARTMENT which describes the progress made on the work program outlined in Attachment"A". The progress report shall also provide detail on the dedicated matching funds. B. The GRANT RECIPIENT shall furnish, along with or prior to submitting the final invoice voucher, the final products, and a close out report as designated in Attachment"A". SECTION 10 - CONTRACT AMENDMENTS The DEPARTMENT or the GRANT RECIPIENT may request changes to the CONTRACT or its provisions. It is agreed and understood that no material or substantive alteration or variation of the terms of this CONTRACT shall be valid unless made in writing and signed by both parties. Any oral understanding or agreements shall not be binding unless made in writing and signed by both parties. SECTION 11 -USE OF SUBCONTRACTS The GRANT RECIPIENT may enter into subcontracts for any of the work contemplated under this CONTRACT without obtaining prior written approval of the DEPARTMENT. The GRANT RECIPIENT shall follow local policies regarding procurement, or in absence of local policies, shall use a competitive procurement process. Each CONTRACT that the GRANT RECIPIENT enters into with subcontractors, creditors and others shall contain a clause providing notice that the state and the DEPARTMENT are not responsible for any legal obligation, financial or otherwise, incurred by the GRANT RECIPIENT. The DEPARTMENT reserves the right to monitor the subcontractor selection process and contractual documents either during or following the selection process. 4 of 12 CONTRACT NO. S06-76104-892 The GRANT RECIPIENT is responsible for the performance of any subcontractors. The GRANT RECIPIENT shall require all subcontractors to follow the same rules and regulations as described in this document. All subcontractors must be monitored by the GRANT RECIPIENT to ensure fiscal accountability. SECTION 12 - RECAPTURE PROVISIONS In the event that the GRANT RECIPIENT expends funds under this CONTRACT in violation of state laws and/or the provisions of this CONTRACT,the DEPARTMENT reserves the right to recapture state funds in an amount equivalent to the extent of the noncompliance. Such right of recapture shall exist for a period not to exceed six (6) years following CONTRACT termination. Repayment by the GRANT RECIPIENT of funds under this recapture provision shall occur within 30 days of demand. In the event that the DEPARTMENT is required to institute legal proceedings to enforce the recapture provision and prevails, the DEPARTMENT shall be entitled to its costs thereof, including reasonable attorney's fees. SECTION 13 -DOCUMENTATION, MONITORING AND AUDIT During the CONTRACT period and following its termination,the GRANT RECIPIENT shall follow accounting procedures and shall maintain books, records, documents, and other evidence which sufficiently and properly reflect all project specific costs expended in the performance of this CONTRACT. The Office of the State Auditor or any persons duly authorized by the DEPARTMENT shall have full access to and the right to inspect, excerpt, audit, or examine any of these materials at all reasonable times for a period of six (6)years after :rmination of the CONTRACT. The DEPARTMENT may require a copy of the GRANT RECIPIENT'S most recent audit and management letter. The DEPARTMENT may require the GRANT RECIPIENT to obtain an audit for specific expenditures under this CONTRACT. Costs of a required audit are an allowable expense. SECTION 14 -ACKNOWLEDGMENT OF STATE FUNDING The GRANT RECIPIENT shall provide all project-related press releases to the DEPARTMENT. Press releases shall identify the state of Washington as a project financier. If, during the period covered by this CONTRACT, the GRANT RECIPIENT displays signs or markers or circulates any communication identifying the financial participants in the PROJECT, such sign, marker, or communication shall identify the state of Washington as a participant. The provision of this section shall also apply to any permanent signs or markers displayed at the PROJECT site. SECTION 15 -NONDISCRIMINATION CLAUSE During the performance of this CONTRACT,the GRANT RECIPIENT shall comply with all federal and state 'ondiscrimination laws, including but not limited to, chapter 49.60 RCW, Washington's Law Against +incrimination, and 42 U.S.C. 12101 et seq., the Americans with Disabilities Act(ADA). 5 of 12 CONTRACT NO. S06-76104-892 ' In the event of the GRANT RECIPIENT'S noncompliance or refusal to comply with any nondiscrimination law, regulation, or policy,this CONTRACT may be rescinded, canceled, or terminated in whole or in part, and the GRANT RECIPIENT may be declared ineligible for further contracts with the DEPARTMENT. The GRAN RECIPIENT shall, however, be given a reasonable time in which to cure this noncompliance. Any dispute may be resolved in accordance with Section 22. SECTION 16-TERMINATION OF CONTRACT A. If the GRANT RECIPIENT fails to fulfill its obligations under this CONTRACT,the DEPARTMENT may terminate the CONTRACT upon written notice to the GRANT RECIPIENT specifying the reason for termination. The termination date shall be specified in the notice of termination. In the alternative,the DEPARTMENT may, in its sole discretion,provide notice to the GRANT RECIPIENT that termination will occur unless the GRANT RECIPIENT corrects the violation within a specified number of days. B. Notwithstanding any other provisions of this CONTRACT, either party may terminate this CONTRACT by providing written notice of such termination, specifying the effective date thereof, at least thirty(30) days prior to such date. C. Reimbursement for GRANT RECIPIENT work performed, and not otherwise paid for by the DEPARTMENT prior to the effective date of such termination, shall be as the DEPARTMENT reasonably determines. D. In the event funds are not reappropriated for this PROJECT in the 2007-2009 biennial budget,this CONTRACT shall terminate on June 30, 2007. *ari° SECTION 17- GRANT RECIPIENT NOT EMPLOYEE OF DEPARTMENT The GRANT RECIPIENT, its employees, or agents performing under this CONTRACT are not deemed to be employees of the DEPARTMENT or agents of the DEPARTMENT in any manner whatsoever. The GRANT RECIPIENT will not hold itself out as or claim to be an officer or employee of the DEPARTMENT or of the state of Washington and will not make any claim, demand, or application to or for any right or privilege applicable to an officer or employee of the DEPARTMENT or of the state of Washington. SECTION 18 - OWNERSHIP OF PROJECT/CAPITAL FACILITIES The DEPARTMENT makes no claim to any real property improved or constructed with funds awarded under this CONTRACT and does not assert and will not acquire any ownership interest in or title to the capital facilities and/or equipment constructed or purchased with state funds under this CONTRACT. This provision does not extend to claims that the DEPARTMENT may bring against the GRANT RECIPIENT in recapturing funds expended in violation of this CONTRACT. SECTION 19 -APPLICABLE LAWS AND REGULATIONS The GRANT RECIPIENT shall comply with all existing applicable laws, ordinances, codes, regulations and policies of local, state,and federal governments, as now or hereafter amended. The PROJECT funded under this CONTRACT may be subject to prevailing wage law(Chapter 39.12 RCW). The GRANT RECIPIENT is advised to consult the Washington Department of Labor and Industries and/or 6 of 12 CONTRACT NO. S06-76104-892 private counsel to determine whether prevailing wages must be paid. The DEPARTMENT is not responsible for determining whether prevailing wage applies to this PROJECT or for any prevailing wage payments that may be required by law. SECTION 20 - SPECIAL PROVISION The DEPARTMENT'S failure to insist upon the strict performance of any provision of this CONTRACT or to exercise any right based upon a breach thereof or the acceptance of any performance during such breach shall not constitute a waiver of any obligation or right under this CONTRACT. SECTION 21 -HOLD HARMLESS The GRANT RECIPIENT agrees to defend,hold harmless, and indemnify the state of Washington and the DEPARTMENT, their officers, agents, employees, and assigns against any and all damages or claims for damages resulting or allegedly resulting from the GRANT RECIPIENT'S performance or lack of performance under the terms of this CONTRACT. SECTION 22 - DISPUTE RESOLUTION Except as otherwise provided in this CONTRACT, when a bona fide dispute arises between the parties and it -,annot be resolved through discussion and negotiation, either party may request a dispute hearing. The parties ''hall select a dispute resolution team to resolve the dispute. The team shall consist of a representative appointed by the DEPARTMENT, a representative appointed by the GRANT RECIPIENT,and a third party mutually agreed upon by both parties. The team shall attempt, by majority vote,to resolve the dispute. The parties agree that this dispute process shall precede any action in a judicial or quasi-judicial tribunal. SECTION 23 - GOVERNING LAW AND VENUE The CONTRACT shall be construed and enforced in accordance with, and the laws of the state of Washington hereof shall govern the validity and performance. Venue of any suit between the parties arising out of this CONTRACT shall be the superior court of Thurston County, Washington. SECTION 24 - SEVERABILITY In the event any term or condition of this CONTRACT or application thereof to any person or circumstances is held invalid, such invalidity shall not affect other terms, conditions, or applications of this CONTRACT which can be given effect without the invalid term, condition, or application. To this end,the terms and conditions of this CONTRACT are declared severable. SECTION 25 - HISTORICAL AND CULTURAL ARTIFACTS Tn the event that historical or cultural artifacts are discovered at the PROJECT site during construction, the RANT RECIPIENT shall immediately stop construction and notify the local historical preservation officer and the state historical preservation officer at the Department of Archaeology and Historic Preservation. 7 of 12 CONTRACT NO. S06-76104-892 SECTION 26 -REAPPROPRIATION The parties hereto understand and agree that any state funds not expended by June 30, 2007, will lapse on the date unless specifically reappropriated by the Washington State Legislature. If funds are so reappropriated,the state's obligation under the terms of this CONTRACT shall be contingent upon the terms of such reappropriation. SECTION 27- ENTIRE AGREEMENT This CONTRACT, including referenced exhibits, represents all the terms and conditions agreed upon by the parties. No other understandings or representations, oral or otherwise, regarding the subject matter of this contract shall be deemed to exist or to bind any of the parties hereto. The attachments to this agreement are as follows: ATTACHMENT A: Scope of Work, consisting of 1 page; ATTACHMENT B: Certification of the Availability of Funds to Complete the Project, consisting of 1 page; ATTACHMENT C: Budget, consisting of 1 page; and ATTACHMENT D: Special Conditions, consisting of 1 page. 8 of 12 CONTRACT NO. S06-76104-892 ATTACHMENT A: SCOPE OF WORK Grant Recipient: City of Renton Summary: The City of Renton will complete the necessary utility improvements to redevelop District 1 of the Boeing redevelopment area; and construct the first phase of utilities, exclusive of roadway costs, for the South Lake Washington(Lakeshore Landing)project. Activities and Estimated Costs: (All activities will be completed no later than June 30, 2007.) • Complete the utility design for the first portion of development—$2,400,000. • Construct utilities for the first portion of development—$19,100,000. • Administration—$1,877,000. Deliverables: • Digital photographs of the sites of each of the activities before, during and after construction. All deliverables must be received by the DEPARTMENT no later than July 6, 2007. Progress reports will be submitted on a quarterly schedule to the DEPARTMENT along with requests for •eimbursement. The following dates establish this reporting schedule: 41100. • July 7, 2006 • October 15, 2006 • January 15, 2007 • April 15, 2007 • July 6, 2007 Nosy 9 of 12 CONTRACT NO. S06-76104-892 ATTACHMENT B: CERTIFICATION OF THE AVAILABILITY OF FUNDS TO COMPLETE THE PROJECT Non- State Funds Amount Status City Transportation Funds $18,377,000 Secured State Funds 2005 State Capital Budget 5,000,000 Secured Total Non-State and State Sources $23,377,000 CERTIFICATION The GRANT RECIPIENT, by its signature, certifies that PROJECT funding from sources other than those provided by this CONTRACT and identified above,has either been expended for eligible PROJECT expenses, or is committed in writing and available and will remain committed and available solely and specifically for carrying out the purposes of this PROJECT as described elsewhere in this CONTRACT,as of the date and year written below. The GRANT RECIPIENT shall maintain records sufficient to evidence that it has expended or has access to the funds needed to complete the PROJECT, and shall make such records available for the DEPARTMENT'S review upon reasonable request. GRANT RECIPIENT Kathy Keolker, Mayor City of Renton DATE 10 of 12 CONTRACT NO. S06-76104-892 ATTACHMENT C: BUDGET 'err The budget shall consist of the following elements: CTED Grant Other Funds Total 1. Administration $0 $1,877,000 $1,877,000 2. Engineering 650,000 1,750,000 2,400,000 3. Construction 4,350,000 14,750,000 19,100,000 TOTAL $5,000,000 $18,377,000 $23,377,000 Special Budget Provisions: The total amount of transfers of funds between line item budget categories in this CONTRACT shall not exceed ten(10)percent of the total budget. If the cumulative amount of these transfers exceeds or is expected to exceed ten percent, the total budget shall be subject to justification and negotiation of a CONTRACT amendment by the GRANT RECIPIENT and the DEPARTMENT. A sum of ten(10)percent of funds shall be withheld until all activities and final products defined in Attachment"A"have been successfully completed by the GRANT RECIPIENT and accepted fully by the DEPARTMENT. Aftw 11 of 12 CONTRACT NO. S06-76104-892 ' ATTACHMENT D: SPECIAL CONDITIONS PERFORMANCE REPORTING After the completion of the project,the GRANT RECIPIENT shall continue, for up to five years,to provide updates on the economic impact of the PROJECT. The updates shall be in a format acceptable to the DEPARTMENT and describe,but not be limited to,the private sector employment and investment activity resulting from the project. CHANGE OF OWNERSHIP OR USE A. The GRANT RECIPIENT understands and agrees that any and all real property or facilities acquired, constructed, or rehabilitated using state funds under this CONTRACT shall be held and used by the GRANT RECIPIENT for the express purpose or purposes stated elsewhere in this contract for a period of at least ten (10) years from the date the subject facility is occupied. B. In the event the GRANT RECIPIENT is found to be out of compliance with this section,the GRANT RECIPIENT shall repay to the state general fund the amount of the grant as stated in Section 2, hereof,plus interest calculated at the rate of interest on state of Washington general obligation bonds issued most closely to the effective date of the legislation in which the subject facility was authorized. 12 of 12 • Signature Authorization Statement Please send form to: Kathleen Carney,Budget Program Specialist Department of Community,Trade_and Economic Development Economic Development Division PO Box 42525 Olympia WA 985042525 Legal Entity Name: City of Renton Agreement#: S06-76104-892 Contract Description Complete the necessary utility improvements to redevelop District 1 of the Boeing redevelopment area; and construct the first phase of utilities for the South Lake Washington (Lakeshore Landing)project. Business Type: (Individuals,partnerships and sole proprietor's must also submit form W-9) n Individual Sole Proprietorship a Corporation n Partnership n Non-Profit Corporation: (type) n Other Government Type: 171 City n County n Port 0 Tribe n Other Enter for Local Governments,Tribes and other Tax Identification Number: a ( 2 7 Business types Or Social Security Number: - - Enter for Individual or Sole Proprietorship Only "The state of Washington is unable to Issue vendor payments without a tax identification or social security number. Authorized to sign Requests for Reimbursements (Two signatures are reccommended. One may be the same as signature below.) Signature Print or Type Name Title If elected,and of Term date Pejrh1 P/g/Pul Pemex Nze.h h Ad min((*skydive IMer i wl DesiyY' Itch V 4'4-t ' St)per visor I certify that the tax payer identification number and business type shown on this form are correct. I certify that I have been given the authority by City of Renton to negotiate and execute grants. In addition, I give the above persons the authority to sign reimbursement requests. Signature of person authorized to sign Grants and give authority to Date If elected,end of Term *111 persons listed above to sign Requests for Reimbursements date CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON, AUTHORIZING THE MAYOR AND CITY CLERK TO ENTER INTO AN INTERLOCAL AGREEMENT WITH THE WASHINGTON STATE COMMUNITY, TRADE AND ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT DIVISION FOR A $5 MILLION GRANT FOR THE SOUTH LAKE WASHINGTON INFRASTRUCTURE PROJECT. WHEREAS, the City intends to provide necessary infrastructure improvements to District 1 of the Boeing Redevelopment Area; and WHEREAS, the State Department of Community, Trade and Economic Development has funds available to assist the City; and WHEREAS, the State Department of Community, Trade and Economic Development is willing to provide the City with a grant of $5 million toward the design, construction and administration of the necessary utility improvements to redevelop District 1 of the Boeing Redevelopment Area; and WHEREAS, it is necessary to document the terms and conditions under which such grant is provided to the City; NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON, DOES RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS: SECTION I. The above findings are true and correct in all respects. SECTION II. The Mayor and City Clerk are hereby authorized to enter into a contract with Washington State Community, Trade and Economic Development, Economic Development Division, for a$5 million grant to complete the necessary utility improvements for District 1 of the Boeing Redevelopment Area. 1 RESOLUTION NO. ``4"r PASSED BY THE CITY COUNCIL this day of , 2006. Bonnie I. Walton, City Clerk APPROVED BY THE MAYOR this day of , 2006. Kathy Keolker, Mayor Approved as to form: Lawrence J. Warren, City Attorney lo ,, RES.1170:4/17/06 2 sTATF 'L 1889 AUG 1 8 2005 STATE OF WASHINGTON + Fr . *401 DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY, TRADE AND ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT 128- 10t Avenue SW • PO Box 42525 • Olympia, Washington 98504-2525 • (360) 725-4000 August 12, 2005 The Honorable Kathy Keolker-Wheeler Mayor of Renton 1055 South Grady Way Renton,Washington 98055 Dear Mayor Keolker-Wheeler: I am pleased to inform you that the 2005 Legislature appropriated$5 million to the City of Renton for the Infrastructure for Renton Boeing Property Project. These funds are included in Section 138 of the 2005 —2007 Capital Budget(ESSB 6904). The Department of Community, Trade and Economic Development(CTED), Community Economic Assistance Center, will administer the grant and monitor the progress of the project until completion. Enclosed with this letter are materials that need to be completed in order to move your project forward. These include a contractor information form, scope of work, and budget page. Also enclosed are examples of a completed scope of work and budget page. Electronic versions of the forms are also available. As soon as we receive the completed materials,we will begin preparing the grant. We anticipate the grant process will take approximately four weeks. Reimbursement requests for costs associated with the project may be submitted once the grant has been executed. Matt Ojennus is your contact person at CTED and can be reached at 360-725-4047 or by email at matthewo@cted.wa.gov. Guidelines for managing your grant as well as the appropriate forms for requesting reimbursement will be provided to you. We will also be sending out survey forms to gather information on jobs and investments related to your project. CTED program staff are available throughout the contract duration to provide assistance. Congratulations on this state grant award. We look forward to working with the City of Renton to bring this project to fruition. Since ely, Victor quez fistant Director Econ. is De -1.pment Division cc: Alex Pietsch, City of Renton Enclosures Z) CITY OF 1TON PLANNING/BUILDINu/PUBLIC WORKS TRANSPORTATION SYSTEMS DIVISION 2006-2011 SIX-YEAR TIP South Lake Washington Roadway Improvements -Districts 1 & 2 Functional Classification: N/A Fund: 317 Proj.Length: N/A Proj: 12306 RANK: 12 CONTACT: Rob Lochmiller 425.430.7303 DESCRIPTION: STATUS: The project will construct the needed roadway improvements in the South Lake Washington area to Consultant contract awarded in 2004 to complete 30%design for roadway improvements support future redevelopment plans. New roads and intersections will be built and existing roadways will needed to support District 1. The consultant was awarded a contract to complete final be widened/extended to provide adequate future traffic flows. Redevelopment is phased into 2 districts, design of District 1 in 2005 for$927,330 to be completed by Feb.2006. City Council each having their own needed roadway improvements. Roadways included in the project are Logan, Park, allocated$1.5 million from the General Fund in 2004. Transportation funds expended from and Garden Avenues,and 6th,8th,and 10th Streets. Fund 317 will be reimbursed. JUSTIFICATION: CHANGES: Key project fro the redevelopment of Boeing's north Renton site. The partnership between the City and 'The City is in the process of applying for bonds to fund this project. Costs reflect roadway Boeing aspires to draw private interest in an area to be redeveloped from the aerospace company's use to improvements to include road and stormwater,as well as sanitary sewer and water commercial/retail use. A tight deadline has been outlined in the agreement that entails the needed improvements. $5 million is expected from the State legislature as shown in 2006. roadway improvements and the new stormwater,sewer,and water utilities required to accomodate the shift in land use. I Funded :1 22,989,7731 Unfunded:I 16,950,000 Project Totals Programmed Pre-2006 Six-Year Program ITEM Programmed Spent Pre-2005 2005 Total 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 EXPENSES: _ Project Development Precon Eng/Admin 3,342,773 950,773 1,100,000, 1,292,000 292,000, 1,000,000 R-O-W(includes Admin) Construction Contract Fee 33,270,000 33,270,000 15,650,000 3,120,000 14,500,000 Construction Eng/Admin 3,327,000 3,327,000 1,565,000 312,000 1,450,000 Other TOTAL EXPENSES 39,939,773 950,773 1,100,000 37,889,000 17,507,000 3,432,000 16,950,000 SOURCES OF FUNDS: - Vehicle Fuel Tax Business License Fee Proposed Fund Balance Grants In-Hand Mitigation In-Hand Bonds'/L.1.D.'s Formed 16,489,773 550,773 15,939,000 12,507,000 3,432,000 Other In-Hand(GF and State) 6,500,000, 950,773 549,227 5,000,000 5,000,000 Grants Proposed _ Mitigation Proposed L.I.D.'s Proposed Other Proposed • Undetermined 16,950,000 16,950,000 16,950,000 TOTAL SOURCES 39,939,773 950,773 1,100,000 37,889,000 17,507,000 3,432,000 16,950,000 S lake WA N,prov. 05/09/1005 5 22 AM 5-12 FINAL .., . CITY OF RENTON COUNCIL AGENDA BILL AI#: g. r Submitting Data: Transportation Systems For Agenda of: Dept/Div/Board.. Planning/Building/Public Works April 24, 2006 Staff Contact Peter Hahn, x 7242 Agenda Status Consent X Subject: Public Hearing.. Approval of Three Limited-Term Employees (LTEs)to Correspondence.. Provide Construction Management and Inspection Ordinance Services for Two 2006 Capital Transportation Projects— Resolution SR-169 HOV Improvements and Duvall Ave NE Old Business Exhibits: New Business Study Sessions Issue Paper Information Recommended Action: Approvals: Refer to Finance Committee Legal Dept X Finance Dept X Fiscal Impact: Account 317.012123; 317.012305; 317.012175 Expenditure Required... $ 279,500 Transfer/Amendment Amount Budgeted $ 795,400 Revenue Generated $ 399,360 Total Project Budget $ 12,853,783 City Share Total Project. $ 4,598,360 SUMMARY OF ACTION: The 2006,Fund 317 budget includes funding for two transportation projects, which are to be advertised for bid in 2006—SR-169 HOV Improvements and Duvall Avenue NE. These projects require both construction engineering and construction inspection services, which are funded in the project budgets. Both Transportation Systems and Development Services have qualified staff,however they are already over-extended due to current workloads. The intensity of the subject projects demands constant oversight therefore department managers have worked with Union Local 2170 to identify how to best meet the construction management staffing needs for these projects. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Authorize the Mayor to use approved funding for the SR 169 HOV Improvements and Duvall Avenue NE projects to create and fill three limited—term(LTE)positions to provide construction inspection and construction management services for these projects. P 0 PLANNINGBUILDING/ a az, + PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT • MEMORANDUM DATE: April 24, 2006 TO: Randy Corman, Council President Members of the Renton City Council VIA: iC.Kathy Keolker, Mayor FROM: Gregg Zimmerm�rr[,administrator STAFF CONTACT: Peter Hahn, Deputy PBPW Administrator(x7242) SUBJECT: Approval of Three Limited -Term Employees (LTEs)to Provide Construction Management and Inspection Services for Two 2006 Capital Transportation Projects—SR 169 HOV Improvements and Duvall Ave NE ISSUE: Should Council authorize the Mayor to create three limited—term employee (LTE)positions to provide construction engineering and construction inspection services for two Transportation Systems Division 2006 capital projects—SR-169 HOV Improvements and Duvall Avenue NE? RECOMMENDATION: Authorize the Mayor to use approved funding for the SR-169 HOV Improvements and Duvall Avenue NE projects to create and fill three limited—term positions to provide construction inspection and construction management services for these projects. BACKGROUND: The 2006 budget provides funding for two projects for construction in 2006. They are the SR-169 HOV Improvements project and the Duvall Avenue NE project. The project budgets contain allocations for construction engineering and inspection. Staff has been considering how best to fill these resource needs. In the past the City has most often used construction inspectors from the Development Services Division. In discussing workloads in 2006,this option is not available. Also, the Transportation Systems Division does not have sufficient resources to provide the engineering services for these projects. The Landing project will be utilizing consultants for these services as will the Duvall/Sunset intersection (authorized by Council on April 10, 2006). ''err The subject of how the Transportation Systems Division carries out construction management, which includes engineering, inspection, and administration,was discussed at a Randy Corman,Council President Members of the Renton City Council Page 2 of 2 April 24,2006 number of meetings with representatives from Union Local 2170. Both parties agree that the Transportation Systems Division has an unusually high level of capital construction in 2006 and 2007. Both parties also understand the challenge of finding qualified staffing for the construction management needs. The agreement between the two parties is to seek LTEs where possible to do this temporary work. Management also agreed to seek to address long- term resource needs in construction inspection during the 2007 budget process. The three limited - term positions are for two construction inspectors (pay grade a21, Step C), and one Civil Engineer III (pay grade a27, Step C). We are assuming that we will need these positions for 12 months. The total cost, including miscellaneous office equipment, is projected to be $279,500. The total construction management allocation in the TIP for the Duvall Avenue project(both the City portion and the county's portion-these are listed in the TIP as two separate projects) is$368,200. The total construction management allocation in the TIP for the second phase of the SR-169 project is $427,200. Alternatives The alternative to the LTE option is to use consultants to provide one or both of the functions (construction engineering and construction inspection) for these two projects. In the event that the LTE recruitment does not find qualified candidates,the Transportation Systems Division would use consultant contracts for the needed construction management work, either partially or in its entirety. For the SR-169 HOY Improvements project, the division did already complete consultant selection(March 14)and report back to the Council's Transportation Committee. This project will get underway first, and if a qualified LTE candidate is not found, the division would be able to bring a consultant contract to the City Council very quickly. cc: Peter Hahn,Deputy PB/PW Administrator—Transportation Rich Perteet,Interim Transportation Design,Planning&Programming Supervisor Sharon Griffin,Transportation Planning Program Development Coordinator James Wilhoit,Transportation Design Project Manager Rob Lochmiller,Transportation Design Project Manager Connie Brundage,Transportation Administrative Secretary H\Divisarts\TRANSPORTAI\ADMIN\Agenda 2006\LTE's for Duvall and SR169 HOV projects 2006 Issue Paper_GZ Comments.doc ar ( ( t . CITY OF RENTON PLANNING/BUILDING/PUBLIC WORKS TRANSPORTATION SYSTEMS DIVISION 2006-2011 SIX-YEAR TIP SR 169 HOV- 140th Way SE to SR-900 Functional Classification: Principal Fund: 317 Proj.Length: N/A Proj: 12175 RANK: 45 CONTACT: Rob Lochmiller 425.430.7303 DESCRIPTION: STATUS: Construct queue jumps and bypass lanes that provide transit priority traffic signal improvements on SR-169(Maple WSDOT committed$300,000 to design and$450,000 to construction. King County committed Valley Highway)at 140th Way SE and in the area 1-405. Involves roadway widening at intersection approaches approximately$275,000 to this project by constructing a holding pond at 140th Way SE for our use. and modifications to channelization and traffic signals. Also includes widening to Improve the north-bound on ramp Design is complete for total buildout. Received TEA-21 Countywide grant of$392,947 for and south-bound off ramp movement at the I-405/SR 169 interchange. Improve access to Cedar River Park and construction. Council allocated$1.2 million from the King County Metro mitigation fund(*included Stoneway site through traffic modifications. in proposed fund balance). JUSTIFICATION: CHANGES: This is a high volume,high congestion corridor where providing travel time benefits for transit and car/van pools All phases for this project are now funded. Awarded$2,208,000 from the Transportation can be achieved with high cost effectiveness. Also there are severe congestion and safety problems that can be Improvement Board(TIB)for Phase 2 right-of-way and construction. Received$765,993 TEA-21 addressed by adding a right turn lane west-bound on SR-169 and a protected right turn lane from the 1-405 Countywide funds for Phase 2 construction. State legislature funded$2.5M in gas tax revenue for northbound off ramp on to east-bound SR-169. 2007-2009 biennium. (Funded : 18,350,791 (Unfunded : Project Totals _ Programmed Pre-2006 Six-Year Program _ ITEM Programmed Spent Pre-2005 2005 Total 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 EXPENSES: Project Development Precon Eng/Admin 1,046,291 896,231 50,060 100,000 100,000 R-O-W(includes Admin) 500000500,000 500,000 , Construction Contract Fee _ 6,024,500 1,273 935,027 5,088,200 1,038,200 1,800,000 2,250,000 Construction Eng/Admin 780,000 87 132,713 647,200 117,200 280,000 250,000, Other TOTAL EXPENSES' 8,350,791 897,591 1,117,800 6,335,400 1,755,400 2,080,000 2,500,000 SOURCE OF FUNDS: Vehicle Fuel Tax Business License Fee 197,251 197,251 197,251 Proposed Fund Balance* 1,200,000 178,991 724,853 296,156 296,156 Grants In-Hand(TIB/TEA-21) 3,366,940 392,947 2,973,993 1555,400 1_3 18,593 . Mitigation In-Hand 786,600 418,600 368,000 100 000 268000 Bonds/L.I.D.'s Formed Other(WSDOT&State Leg.) 2 800 000 300,000 2,500,000 2,500,000 Grants Proposed Mitigation Proposed _ L.I.D.'s Proposed Other Proposed Undetermined TOTAL SOURCES 8,350,791 897,591 1,117,800 6,335,400 1,755,400 2,080,000 2,500,000 ` SR1N HOV 0ea3t2035 e:fAM 5-45 FINAL itiritimitirtmortititititittitirii CITY OF RENTON PLANNING/BUILDING/PUBLIC WORKS TRANSPORTATION SYSTEMS DIVISION 2006-2011 SIX-YEAR TIP Duvall Ave NE -SR-900 to North City Limits Functional Classification: Minor Arterial Fund: 317 Proj.Length: 1.67 miles Proj: 12123 RANK: 28 CONTACT: James Wilhoit 425.430.7319 DESCRIPTION: STATUS: Widening roadway to 5 lanes,includes:curbs,sidewalks,storm drainage,street lighting,channelization, Received a TIB grant in partnership with King County;the City of Newcastle also received and bikeway from SR-900 to the North City limits. a TIB grant for their section of Coal Creek Parkway. The City of Renton's grant award is $3,095,640. The City is managing King County's project separately. JUSTIFICATION: CHANGES: Growing residential areas use this route which is also becoming a major through route between Renton Increase in construction cost estimate of approximately$700,000. Construction delayed to and Bellevue,as well as freight traffic. late 2005 or 2006 due to environmental and drainage issues. Funding spent tracked through project spreadsheet,not Eden,due to project split-out. !Funded: 14,303,219 !Unfunded: I Project Totals Programmed Pre-2006 Six-Year Program ITEM Programmed Spent Pre-2006 2005 Total 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 EXPENSES: • Project Development Precon Eng/Admin 927,966 519,391 356,475 52,100 52,100• R-O-W(includes Admin) 448,258 12,028 436,230 Construction Contract Fee 2,712,700 50,000 2,662,700 2,262,700_ 400,000 Construction Eng/Admin 214,295 7,295 207,000 ' 160,000 47,000 Other TOTAL EXPENSES 4,303,219 531,419 850,000 2,921,8002,474,800. 447,000 SOURCE OF FUNDS: ' Vehicle Fuel Tax Business License Fee 22,274 22,274 Proposed Fund Balance 588,405 40,479 547,926 421,200 126,726 Grants In-Hand(TIB) 3,095,640 382,666 675,100 2,037,874 1,967,600 70,274 Mitigation In-Hand 596,900 86,000, 174,900 336,000 86,000 250,000 Bonds/L.I.D.'s Formed Other In-Hand Grants Proposed Mitigation Proposed L.I.D.'s Proposed • - Other Proposed Undetermined TOTAL SOURCES 4,303,219 531,419 850,000 2,921,800 2,474,800 447,000 " 0.g adonoos ear 5-28 FINAL • ( ( ( . CITY OF RENTON PLANNING/BUILDING/PUBLIC WORKS TRANSPORTATION SYSTEMS DIVISION 2006-2011 SIX-YEAR TIP Duvall Ave NE (Coal Creek Parkway) - King County Functional Classification: Minor Arterial Fund: 317 Proj.Length: Proj: 12305 RANK: 53 CONTACT: James Wilhoit 425.430.7319 DESCRIPTION: STATUS: Widening roadway to 5 lanes,includes:curb,gutter,sidewalk,drainage improvements,street lighting, The City is managing the King County project with full reimbursement from the County per channelization,signal modification and interconnection,and bikeway from Renton's north city limits to SE approved interlocal agreement. All programmed funding Is subject to King County's 95th Way(Newcastle's south city limits). ongoing approval. King County manages the grant reimbursement for their TIB grant award of$3,196,000. JUSTIFICATION: CHANGES: Growing residential areas use this route which is also becoming a major through route between Renton Construction delayed to 2005 or 2006 due to environmental,drainage and County and Bellevue,as well as freight traffic. There are currently two general-purpose lanes with little or no coordination issues. Increase in construction cost estimate. R-O-W costs,other than pedestrian facilities,and left-turn lanes at various locations. Because there are uncompleted gaps minor administrative costs,have been removed;R-O-W will be purchased directly by King between the five-lane sections from unincorporated King County to Sunset By.,the arterial exhibits County. Funding spent tracked through project spreadsheet, not Eden,due to project split- congestion and travel-time delays for all modes of traffic. out;actual reimbursement shown Pre-2005. [Funded: [4,503,364 (Unfunded: I _ Project Totals Programmed Pre-2006 Six-Year Program ITEM Programmed Spent Pre-2005 2005 Total 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 EXPENSES: v Project Development Precon Eng/Admin 636,768 375,074 261,694 R-O-W(includes Admin) 5,332 5,332 ` Construction Contract Fee 3,707,264 138,074 3,569,190_ 3,069,190 500,000 Construction Eng/Admin 154,00030,000 124,000 100,000, 24,000 Other TOTAL EXPENSES 4,503,364 375,074 435,100 3,693,190 3,169,190 524,000 SOURCE OF FUNDS: Vehicle Fuel Tax Business License Fee Proposed Fund Balance Grants In-Hand Mitigation In-Hand Bonds/L.I.D.'s Formed Other In-Hand(King County) , 4,503,364_ 169,677_ 640,497 3,693,190 3,169,190 524,000 Grants Proposed Mitigation Proposed , _ L.I.D:s Proposed , Other Proposed Undetermined TOTAL SOURCES 4,503,364 169,677' 640,497 3,693,190 3,169,190 524,000- - owwa o Cowry oewrsoos as NA 5-53 FINAL AM Mil MI M' 0111111 MI MI 111111 Ile 11111 VII Ili 4111 MI 1111 UN III 1111 11111 C'G'�QIQ' 9-41(-46 Gd CITY OF RENTON Renton, Friday, April 14, 2006 APR 1 8 2006 From: Dave S. Nguyen RECEIVED 1422 Jefferson Ave N.E., Renton, WA 98056-3114 CITY CLERK'S OFFICE Phone home (425)430-9685, work(253) 657-1721 -14.L,Ylded Pu611 Fax at work (253) 657-5274; Cell (405) 923-8840 Heatinq y/7.06. To : City of Renton, Renton , WA Subject : I agree to the Highland sub- area re- zoning to high density plan Dear Highland Sub-area re-zoning committee, I, Dave Nguyen, am a resident at the above address. I welcome the re-zoning plan. I agree wholeheartedly with high-density zoning plan, especially the 80-units per acre rule. I even suggest to set higher minimum multi-family units per acre to 30 units per acre minimum, due to the reasons : 1 . Current Renton housing prices are unaffordable to working-class, and young adults 2 . Rental fee is also high for working class and young adults 3 . Even college graduates find it hard to buy a house My absentee vote is "YES" to maximize density according to the Plan of Renton City. Sincerely, Dave j, io • adied G7�Cex � yaY6 Renton, Washington, April 14, 2006 CITY OF RENTON APR 1 8 2006 From: Mrs. Nen Kim Phan 1420 Jefferson Ave N.E., Renton, WA 98056-3114 CITY CLERKS OFFICE Cell phone (405) -9685, work(425) 392-1596 3'n/ended 2'r Pu6/2' 1/eatin9 44/7-06, To : City of Renton, Renton, WA Subject : I agree to the Highland sub-area Re-zoning to High Density Plan Dear Highland Sub-area re-zoning committee, I, Nen Kim Phan, am a resident in the re-zoning area. I agree with high-density zoning plan of City of Renton. I very much agree with the 80-units per acre plan. I would like to raise minimum multi-family units per acre to 25 units minimum per acre due to the reasons as follows : 1 . Housing prices are unaffordable to many, especially the poor, and the young adults 2 . Rental rate is too high for the poor, and young adults I could not attend the Public Hearing, so my letter is my "YES" vote to maximize Density according to the Plan of Renton City. Respectfully, Mrs . Nen Kim Phan P.S. I received the Environmental Review which is very good. I agree with the Environmental Plan of the city of Renton fir:MOVED OVED EKY 1 C:717 C A SCOL Date 49 , o6` COMMITTEE OF THE WHOLE COMMITTEE REPORT April 24, 2006 The Landing Infrastructure Agreement (April 10, 2006) The Committee of the Whole concurs with the recommendation of the Administration to approve and authorize the Mayor to sign an agreement with Transwestern Harvest Lakeshore LLC outlining the coordination and timing of the roadway and utility improvements necessary to facilitate development of The Landing. RaIy Corman, Council President cc: Jay Covington Alex Pietsch Gregg Zimmerman Michael Bailey Ben Wolters Landing infrastructure COW report.doc\ rev 01/02 bh .A.737TIVED BY C /COUNCIL FINANCE COMMITTEE REPORT Date �$1- d006 ! April 24,2006 APPROVAL OF CLAIMS AND PAYROLL VOUCHERS The Finance Committee approves for payment on April 24, 2006, claim vouchers 247523-248017 and 2 wire transfers, totaling $3,090,801.03 , and 609 direct deposits, payroll vouchers 63025- 63191, and 1 wire transfer, totaling $1,947,403.00 . Don Person, Chair Denis Law, Vice-Chair Toni Nelson, Mem er MINIOVED BY CITY COUNCIL FINANCE COMMITTEE Date oleo COMMITTEE REPORT • April 24,2006 AMENDING THE 2006 ANNUAL BUDGET AND CARRYING FORWARD APPROPRIATED FUNDS NOT EXPENDED IN 2005 (Referred April 10, 2006) The Finance Committee recommends adoption of the ordinance authorizing carrying forward appropriated funds not expended in 2005. This ordinance increases the 2006 Annual Budget by$12,623,585. The Committee further recommends that the Ordinance regarding this matter be presented for first and advanced to second and final reading. } Don Persson, Chair lam/' Denis W. Law, Vice Chair Toni Nelson, Member MEB/dlf cc: Michael E.Bailey,Finance&IS Administrator Linda Parks,Fiscal Service Director Bang Parkinson,Finance Analyst Supervisor APPT1OVED BY CM COUNCIL TRANSPORTATION COMMITTEE COMMITTEE REPORT Date 0/006 April 24, 2006 Sound Transit Interlocal Agreement (Referred April 10,2006) The Transportation Committee recommends concurrence in the staff recommendation to approve an Interlocal Agreement with Sound Transit to release their initial funding contribution of$2 5 30,000 for the Rainier Avenue South, Hardie Avenue SW, and SW 27th Street/Strander Boulevard projects. The Committee further recommends that the resolution authorizing the Mayor and City Clerk to sign the interlocal agreement be presented for reading and adoption. Marcie Palmer, Chair f Don Persson, Vice Chair Terri Briere, -mber cc: Peter Hahn,Deputy P/B/PW Administrator Rich Perteet,Interim Transportation Design Supervisor Nathan Jones,Transportation Planner Connie Brundage,Administrative Secretary n:77" t BY CiTY COUNCIL TRANSPORTATION COMMITTEE COMMITTEE REPORT Date 2.006 ,a April 24, 2006 Airport Quonset Hut Building Bid Award (April 10, 2006) The Transportation Committee recommends concurrence in the staff recommendation to accept the low bid submitted by Lincoln Construction, Inc. for the Airport Quonset Hut Building#790 Construction Project in the amount of$129,851. The Committee further recommends authorizing a fund transfer from the Airport's Airside/Landside Separation Fund in the amount of$118,420 to cover the cost of contract, and authorizing the Mayor and City Clerk to sign the contract. 44404_,- Marcie Palmer, Chair -/y/9; 1"-e- Don Persson, Vice Chair \,„,/644A: r Terri Briere, ember cc: Ryan Zulauf,Airport Manager Bruce Fisher,Airport Operations Specialist Susan Campbell/Carolyn Currie,Airport Secretary Connie Brundage,Administrative Secretary Arnr IVED BY I CM/COUNCIL PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT COMMITTEE COMMITTEE REPORT Date /-,,W-?t .°6' April 24, 2006 Highlands Sub-Area Zoning Amendments (Referred March 14, 2005) The Planning and Development Committee recommends setting a public hearing May 8, 2006 to consider extension of the existing moratorium on new development in the R-10 and RM-F zones within the Highlands Sub-Area Plan Study Area. The purpose of this extended moratorium is to provide adequate time for resolution of the appeal of the SEPA determination on the Highlands Sub-Area Rezoning proposal before the City Hearing Examiner, and to allow the City Council to consider public testimony and to review staff and Planning Commission recommendations concerning the appropriate density and use of land within the Highlands Sub-Area Plan Study Area prior to adoption of a zoning text amendment and rezone proposal. Tern Brie Chair Dan Clawson, Vice Chair )/(2/1t-t.0. 1IltQjt Marcie Palmer, Member cc: Jay Covington Alex Pietsch Neil Watts Gregg Zimmerman PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT COMMITTEEMoratoriumApri124.doc\ Rev 01/06 bh /doff/Pa! 4 y aDO(, CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON RESOLUTION NO. 3 103 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON, AUTHORIZING THE MAYOR AND CITY CLERK TO ENTER INTO AN INTERLOCAL AGREEMENT WITH THE WASHINGTON STATE COMMUNITY, TRADE AND ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT DIVISION FOR A $5 MILLION GRANT FOR THE SOUTH LAKE WASHINGTON INFRASTRUCTURE PROJECT. WHEREAS, the City intends to provide necessary infrastructure improvements to District 1 of the Boeing Redevelopment Area; and WHEREAS,the State Department of Community, Trade and Economic Development has funds available to assist the City; and WHEREAS, the State Department of Community, Trade and Economic Development is willing to provide the City with a grant of $5 million toward the design, construction and administration of the necessary utility improvements to redevelop District 1 of the Boeing Redevelopment Area; and WHEREAS, it is necessary to document the terms and conditions under which such grant is provided to the City; NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON, DOES RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS: SECTION L The above findings are true and correct in all respects. SECTION II. The Mayor and City Clerk are hereby authorized to enter into a contract with Washington State Community, Trade and Economic Development, Economic Development Division, for a $5 million grant to complete the necessary utility improvements for District 1 of the Boeing Redevelopment Area. 1 RESOLUTION NO. PASSED BY THE CITY COUNCIL this day of , 2006. Bonnie I. Walton, City Clerk APPROVED BY THE MAYOR this day of , 2006. Kathy Keolker, Mayor Approved as to form: Lawrence J. Warren, City Attorney RES.1170:4/17/06 2 /9dalv/ed y.1y 0006 CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON RESOLUTION NO. ,3F'OI A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON, AUTHORIZING THE MAYOR AND CITY CLERK TO ENTER INTO AN INTERLOCAL COOPERATIVE AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE CENTRAL PUGET SOUND REGIONAL TRANSIT AUTHORITY AND THE CITY OF RENTON, FOR THE STRANDER BLVD/SW 27TH STREET EXTENSION: WEST VALLEY HIGHWAY TO OAKESDALE AVENUE SW PROJECT, AND THE RAINIER/HARDIE AVENUE ARTERIAL IMPROVEMENTS PROJECT. WHEREAS, Sound Transit is a governmental entity vested with all powers necessary to implement a high capacity transportation system within its boundaries in King, Pierce, and Snohomish Counties as provided in RCW 81.104 and 81.112; and WHEREAS, Sound Transit and the City of Renton recognize the need to collaborate on the design and development of transit improvements to effectively and efficiently provide bus service to the City and the surrounding area; and WHEREAS, constructing and operating transit improvements within the region is a complex task, requiring maximum cooperation and efficient use of resources between the parties, and the parties recognize the efficiencies and economies inherent in jointly designing and constructing the transit improvements funded by Sound Transit, contemporaneously with general purpose improvements funded by the City; and WHEREAS,the City and Sound Transit agreed to jointly pursue the implementation plan for certain transit and HOV improvements by letter dated April 19, 2005, from Sound Transit Board Chair John Ladenburg to Mayor Kathy Keolker-Wheeler of Renton and Mayor Steve Mullet of Tukwila; and 1 RESOLUTION NO. WHEREAS,the Strander Boulevard/SW 27th Extension: West Valley Highway to Oakesdale Ave S.W. Project, which includes transit queue jump improvements at the intersections of SW 27th Street with the Boeing access, Oakesdale Avenue SW and Lind Avenue SW, will have quantifiable benefits to transit in improving transit speed and reliability, specifically to the nearby Sound Transit Sounder Tukwila Station; and WHEREAS,the Rainier/Hardie Avenue Arterial Improvements Project will allow Sound Transit and King County Metro express bus service to bypass the heavily congested Rainier Avenue and achieve a significant time saving in both the northbound and southbound directions; and WHEREAS,pursuant to the April 19, 2005, Letter of Intent, Sound Transit is willing to contribute a fixed amount of$4 million to the City's Strander Boulevard/SW 27th Street Extension: West Valley Highway to Oakesdale Ave S.W. Project, which amount includes a proportional share of the cost of the frontage improvements($2.7 million) and a contribution to the transit queue jump lanes at Lind, Oakesdale, and the Boeing access road($1.3 million); and WHEREAS,pursuant to the April 19, 2005, Letter of Intent, Sound Transit is willing to contribute the fixed amount of$14.9 million for transit improvements on Rainier Avenue and Hardie Avenue; and WHEREAS, it is necessary to set forth the terms to provide for the funding of the preliminary engineering and environmental documentations of the transit improvements to be constructed by the City of Renton in connection with the Strander Boulevard/SW 27th Street Extension: West Valley Highway to Oakesdale Project and the Rainier/Hardie Avenue Arterial Improvements Project(the"Project" or"Projects"). This Agreement will outline the scope, schedule and budget for a future interlocal funding agreement to be executed between the parties 2 RESOLUTION NO. that will provide the remaining Sound Transit funding for the three(3)remaining phases of work for the completion of the transit elements of the Projects by the City; NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON, DOES RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS: SECTION L The above findings are true and correct in all respects. SECTION II. The Mayor and City Clerk are hereby authorized to enter into the Interlocal Cooperative Agreement between the Central Puget Sound Regional Transit Authority and the City of Renton, for the Strander Blvd/SW 271 Street Extension: West Valley Highway to Oakesdale Ave. SW Project, and the Rainier/Hardie Avenue Arterial Improvements Project. PASSED BY THE CITY COUNCIL this day of , 2006. Bonnie I. Walton, City Clerk APPROVED BY THE MAYOR this day of , 2006. Kathy Keolker, Mayor Approved as to form: Lawrence J. Warren, City Attorney RES.1164:3/13/06:ma 3 /S v- a 44' &&adi;�y adoei/ora CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON "/-2,- 01.06 ORDINANCE NO. oCotDot AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON, AMENDING ORDINANCE NO. 5180 RELATING TO THE CITY OF RENTON FISCAL YEAR 2006 ANNUAL BUDGET, AND CARRYING FORWARD APPROPRIATED FUNDS NOT EXPENDED IN 2005. WHEREAS, the City Council passed the City of Renton's 2006 Annual Budget Ordinance (Ordinance No. 5180) on December 12, 2005; and WHEREAS, appropriated funds not expended in 2005 due to capital project interruptions and delays in invoice payments, need to be carried forward into this fiscal year resulting in the need to amend the City of Renton's 2006 annual Budget; NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON, DOES ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS: SECTION I. Ordinance No. 5180 establishing the City of Renton's 2006 Annual Budget is hereby amended as follows: 1. The General Fund (Fund 000) is hereby amended to reflect the following appropriation amendments: GENERAL FUND(Fund 000) FY 2006 Original Amended 2006 Budget 2006 Budget Change REVENUES New Revenue 50,096,256 50,096,256 0 Revenues 50,096,256 50,096,256 0 EXPENDITURES Budget Appropriation 50,061,256 50,061,256 0 Fire Department 15,791 15,791 Public Works Admin 7,900 7,900 Total Appropriation 50,061,256 50,084,947 23,691 Ending Fund Balance 35,000 11,309 (23,691) Expenditures 50,096,256 50,096,256 0 ORDINANCE NO. 2. The Park Fund (Fund 101) is hereby amended to reflect the following appropriation amendments: PARK FUND(Fund 101) FY 2006 Original Amended 2006 Budget 2006 Budget Change REVENUES New Revenue 11,260,376 11,260,376 0 Use of Prior Year Revenue 0 5,000 5,000 Revenues 11,260,376 11,265,376 5,000 EXPENDITURES Budget Appropriation 11,260,376 11,265,376 5,000 Expenditures 11,260,376 11,265,376 5,000 3. The Municipal Facilities Capital Improvement Fund (Fund 316) is hereby amended to reflect the following appropriation amendments: MUNICIPAL FACILITIES CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT FUND(Fund 316) FY 2006 Original Amended 2006 Budget 2006 Budget Change REVENUES New Revenue 2,100,000 2,100,000 0 Use of Prior Year Revenue 1,077,000 3,231,096 2,154,096 Revenues 3,177,000 5,331,096 2,154,096 EXPENDITURES Budget Appropriation 3,177,000 4,929,096 1,752,096 Transfer fund balance to Fund 503 0 402,000 402,000 Expenditures 3,177,000 5,331,096 2,154,096 4. The Transportation Capital Improvement Fund (Fund 317) is hereby amended to reflect the following appropriation amendments: 2 • ORDINANCE NO. TRANSPORTATION CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT FUND (Fund 317) FY 2006 Original Amended 2006 Budget 2006 Budget Change REVENUES New Revenue 16,597,600 16,597,600 0 Use of Prior Year Revenue 1,686,100 2,496,000 809,900 Bond Proceeds 0 3,000,000 3,000,000 Revenues 18,283,700 22,093,600 3,809,900 EXPENDITURES Budget Appropriation 18,283,700 22,093,600 3,809,900 Expenditures 18,283,700 22,093,600 3,809,900 5. The Airport Fund (Fund 402) is hereby amended to reflect the following appropriation amendments: AIRPORT FUND(Fund 402) FY 2006 Original Amended 2006 Budget 2006 Budget Change REVENUES New Revenue 1,921,817 1,921,817 0 Use of Prior Year Revenue 494,983 720,783 225,800 Revenues 2,416,800 2,642,600 225,800 EXPENDITURES Budget Appropriation 2,416,800 2,642,600 225,800 Expenditures 2,416,800 2,642,600 225,800 6. The Solid Waste Utility Fund (Fund 403) is hereby amended to reflect the following appropriation amendments: SOLID WASTE FUND(Fund 403) FY 2006 Original Amended 2006 Budget 2006 Budget Change REVENUES New Revenue 9,104,429 9,104,429 0 Use of Prior Year Revenue 405,819 565,819 160,000 Revenues 9,510,248 9,670,248 160,000 EXPENDITURES Budget Appropriation 9,510,248 9,670,248 160,000 Expenditures 9,510,248 9,670,248 160,000 3 ORDINANCE NO. 7. The Municipal Golf Course System Capital Improvement Fund (Fund 424) is hereby amended to reflect the following appropriation amendments: MUNICIPAL GOLF COURSE CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT FUND(Fund 424) FY 2006 Original Amended 2006 Budget 2006 Budget Change REVENUES New Revenue 154,000 154,000 0 Use of Prior Year Revenue 96,000 288,398 192,398 Revenues 250,000 442,398 192,398 EXPENDITURES Budget Appropriation 250,000 442,398 192,398 Expenditures 250,000 442,398 192,398 8. The Water Utility Construction Fund (Fund 425) is hereby amended to reflect the following appropriation amendments: WATER UTILITY CONSTRUCTION FUND(Fund 425) FY 2006 Original Amended 2006 Budget 2006 Budget Change REVENUES New Revenue 6,715,000 6,715,000 0 Use of Prior Year Revenue 0 1,476,700 1,476,700 Revenues 6,715,000 8,191,700 1,476,700 EXPENDITURES Budget Appropriation 6,715,000 8,191,700 1,476,700 Expenditures 6,715,000 8,191,700 1,476,700 9. Waste Water Utility Construction Fund (Fund 426) is hereby amended to reflect the following appropriation amendments: 4 • ORDINANCE NO. WASTEWATER UTILITY CONSTRUCTION FUND(Fund 426) FY 2006 Original Amended 2006 Budget 2006 Budget Change REVENUES New Revenue 2,600,000 2,600,000 0 Use of Prior Year Revenue 0 2,022,000 2,022,000 Revenues 2,600,000 4,622,000 2,022,000 EXPENDITURES Budget Appropriation 2,600,000 4,622,000 2,022,000 Expenditures 2,600,000 4,622,000 2,022,000 10. The Surface Water Utility Construction Fund (Fund 427) is hereby amended to reflect the following appropriation amendments: SURFACE WATER UTILITY CONSTRUCTION FUND(Fund 427) FY 2006 Original Amended 2006 Budget 2006 Budget Change REVENUES New Revenue 2,300,000 2,300,000 0 Use of Prior Year Revenue 0 1,545,000 1,545,000 Revenues 2,300,000 3,845,000 1,545,000 EXPENDITURES Budget Appropriation 2,300,000 3,845,000 1,545,000 Expenditures 2,300,000 3,845,000 1,545,000 11. The Insurance Fund (Fund 502) is hereby amended to reflect the following appropriation amendments: INSURANCE FUND(Fund 502) FY 2006 Original Amended 2006 Budget 2006 Budget Change REVENUES New Revenue 3,007,503 3,007,503 0 Use of Prior Year Revenue 0 728,498 728,498 Revenues 3,007,503 3,736,001 728,498 EXPENDITURES Budget Appropriation 2,986,001 3,736,001 750,000 Total Appropriation 2,986,001 3,736,001 750,000 Ending Fund Balance 21,502 0 (21,502) Expenditures 3,007,503 3,736,001 728,498 5 ORDINANCE NO. 12. The Information Services Internal Services Fund (Fund 503) is hereby amended to reflect the following appropriation amendments: INFORMATION SERVICES FUND(Fund 503) FY 2006 Original Amended 2006 Budget 2006 Budget Change REVENUES New Revenue 3,431,550 3,431,550 0 Transfer in from Fund 316 0 402,000 402,000 Revenues 3,431,550 3,833,550 402,000 EXPENDITURES Budget Appropriation 3,431,550 3,431,550 0 IS Projects 0 259,000 259,000 Total Appropriation 3,431,550 3,690,550 259,000 Ending Fund Balance 0 143,000 143,000 Expenditures 3,431,550 3,833,550 402,000 SECTION II. A list of all individual budget adjustments and descriptions is hereby attached as Attachment A and is available for public review in the Office of the City Clerk, Renton City Hall. SECTION III. This ordinance shall be effective upon its passage, approval, and five (5) days after publication. PASSED BY THE CITY COUNCIL this day of , 2006. Bonnie I. Walton, City Clerk APPROVED BY THE MAYOR this day of , 2006. Kathy Keolker, Mayor 6 • ORDINANCE NO. Approved as to form: Lawrence J. Warren, City Attorney Date of Publication: ORD.1259:4/19/06:ma 7 ORDINANCE NO. Attachment A Title and Description Amount General Fund-Carryforward 1 FDM Repair/Maintenance(Fire Department) 15,791.00 This was not paid from FDM CIP. It should have been paid from Fire Administration division,repair/maintenance account. 2 Public Work Admin.Monument Survey(PBPW) 7,900.00 Project not completed in 2005 General Fund(Fund 000)Total 23,691.00 Park Fund-Carryforward 3 Teenage Program(Community Services) 5,000.00 United Way donated$5,000 to Teenage Program in 2005 Park Fund(Fund 101)Total 5,000.00 Municipal Facilities CIP Fund-Carryforward 4 Cedar River Trial Extension(Community Services) 221,148.00 Easement/lease negotiation,design development drawings, construction bid documents to be completed in 2006 as initial phase of project 5 Comprehensive Plan Update(Community Services) 49,413.00 Consultant contract executed to complete in 2006 6 City Neighborhood Beautification(Community Service) 24,040.00 Through an RFQ,we will hire an urban forestry consultant.The consultant will develop an urban forestry ordinance using examples of other ordinances with recommendations applicable to Renton's situation. 7 Parks Contingency Plan(Community Services) 95,000.00 Consultant executed contract to re-master plan the Cedar River Greenway, including Cedar River Park,Liberty Park, and the Narco property addressing potential I-405 impacts-also known as Tri-Park 8 Grant Matching Fund(Community Services) 200,000.00 Property acquisition with grant match. Likely grants to be received include purchase of Craig property by the Edlund property 9 Major Maintenance Parks(Community Services) 163,060.00 Burnett Linear Park: $101,325 project under contract.Estimated construction will be completed in June 2006;Riverview Bridge Deck: $36,380 project under contract.Major construction was completed,punch list items are remaining;Coulon Launch Lanes 1-4: $5,500 project under contract;Kennydale Lions Parks: $19,855 project under contract, estimated completion June 2006. 1 of 7 ORDINANCE NO. Attachment A Title and Description Amount 10 Major Maintenance Parks(Community Services) 85,000.00 Edlund property-$85,000 property demolition,sewer utility connection,property safety measures 11 Tiffany Park Recreation Facility(Community Services) 196,595.00 Project moved to 2006 with additional funding requested below 12 Major Maintenance Operational Facilities(Community Services) 80,563.00 Project savings re-appropriated to Tiffany in 2006 for a total of 277,158 13 Major Maintenance Public Facilities(Community Services) 348,981.00 Public Restroom Renovation($120,000);Liberty Stadium Seating($10,000);RCC Storage Building($100,000); Library DDEC Controls($42,000)related to Master Plan; portions of individual building maintenance(painting,staining); other project savings re- appropriated to Tiffany in 2006 14 Major Maintenance Leased Facility(Community Services) 4,707.00 Balance for museum mezzanine support in 2006 15 Museum Major Maintenance(Community Services) 10,747.00 Balance for museum mezzanine support in 2006 16 Henry Moses Pool Lighting(Community Services) 182,105.00 This amount covers prior grant commitments(See#18 above) 17 South Lake Washington Redevelopment(EDNSP pass through) 49,610.00 To cover two contracts with Blumen re: consistency analysis. 18 South Lake Washington Redevelopment(EDNSP) 41,127.00 Complete redevelopment analysis work started in 2005. 19 Information Services Fund 503(Information Services-New request) 402,000.00 Request Cash balance transfer from Fund 316 to 503 for IS CIP due to the IS fund becoming Internal Services Fund in 2006 Municipal Facilities CIP Fund(Fund 316)Total 2,154,096.00 Transportation CIP Fund-Carryforward 20 Street Overlay program(PBPW-TIP) 101,000.00 Carryforward increase 2006 program 21 SW 27th St./Strander BLVD Connection(PBPW-TIP) (1.902,400.00) Transfer to TIP#12240 Strander BLVD/SW 27th Ph1 Seg 1 22 SW 27th St.Phase 1 Seg 1 (PBPW-TIP) 2,485,000.00 Through bond funding 2 of 7 ORDINANCE NO. Attachment A Title and Description Amount 23 Transit Program(PBPW-TIP) 3,000.00 2006 spending anticipated to equal 2005 spending 24 Rainier Ave Corridor Study/Improvement(PBPW-TIP) 2,000.00 Additional coordination with Sound Transit/Design Staff 25 Walkway Program(PBPW-TIP) 321,000.00 To finish 2005 program and construction in 2006. 26 Prosect Development/Predesign(PBPW-TIP) 50,000.00 Increase in programmed funding for pending transfers 27 May Creek Bridge Replacement(PBPW-TIP) 120,000.00 To begin designing;there is no BRAC grant cycle until 2007 28 Traffic Safety Program(PBPW-TIP) 37,000.00 Additional funding for Heather Downs to the total of$87,000 29 CBD Bike&Ped Connections(PBPW-TIP) 80,000.00 Construction in 2005/2006;contract sidewalk standards 30 Grady Way Corridor Study(PBPW-TIP) ')().000.0()) The study will start mid 2006 or later 31 SR 169 HOV- 140th to SR900(PBPW-TIP) 906,800.00 Complete Construction Phase 1,Phase 2 construction 32 Benson Rd-S26th to Main(PBPW-TIP) 157,500.00 Construction moved to 2006 33 Sunset/Duvall Intersection(PBPW-TIP) 1,528,400.00 Construction moved to 2007 34 Lake Washington Blvd Slip Plane(PBPW-TIP) (2.400.00) Completed in 2005 35 Monster Road Bridge (PBPW-TIP) (27.000.00) Completed in 2005 Transportation CIP Fund(Fund 317)Total 3,809,900.00 Airport Fund-Carryforward 36 Apron C utility Installation (PBPW/Airport) 105,000.00 To finish the project not completed in 2005 3 of 7 ORDINANCE NO. Attachment A Title and Description Amount 37 Quonset hut 2nd Fire Escape(PBPW/Airport) 27,800.00 To finish the project not completed in 2005 38 Secondary Blast Fence Reconstruction(PBPW/Airport) 25,000.00 To finish the project not completed in 2005 39 Fire Training Area Remediation(PBPW/Airport) 45,000.00 To finish the project not completed in 2005 40 622 Hangar-Rehab (PBPW/Airport) 23,000.00 To finish the project not completed in 2005 Airport Fund(Fund 402)Total 225,800.00 Solid Waste Utility Fund-Carryforward 41 2006 Clean Sweep Renton(PBPW/Solid Waste) 160,000.00 Continue the program in 2006 Solid Waste Utility Fund(Fund 403)Total 160,000.00 Golf Course Construction Fund-Carryforward 42 Major Maintenance Golf Course(Golf Course Capital) 192,398.00 Driving range netting replacement,Driving range turf carpet repair, Clubhouse/Driving Golf Course Construction Fund(Fund 424)Total 192,398.00 Water Utility Fund-Carryforward 43 Maplewood Water Rights(PBPW/Waterworks Capital) 27,800.00 To continue project not completed in 2005 44 Water Telemetry Systems Improvements (PBPW/Waterworks Capital) 14,600.00 To finish project not completed in 2005 45 Water System Plan Update(PBPW/Waterworks Capital) 55,600.00 To finish project not completed in 2005 46 Update Emergency Response Plan(PBPW/Waterworks Capital) 50,200.00 To continue project not completed in 2005 47 Water Main Rehabilitation(PBPW/Waterworks Capital) 100,000.00 To finish project not completed in 2005 48 Water Conservation Program(PBPW/Waterworks Capital) 7,200.00 To continue project not completed in 2005 4 of 7 ORDINANCE NO. Attachment A Title and Description Amount 49 Update Fireflow Analysis(PBPW/Waterworks Capital) 5,500.00 To continue project not completed in 2005 50 Reservoir Recoating(PBPW/Waterworks Capital) 4,000.00 To continue project not completed in 2005 51 Emergency Response Projects(PBPW/Waterworks Capital) 68,500.00 To continue project not completed in 2005 52 Downtown Core Rehabilitation(PBPW/Waterworks Capital) 86,300.00 To continue project not completed in 2005 53 Water Quality Monitoring(PBPW/Waterworks Capital) 13,600.00 To continue project not completed in 2005 54 Highlands 565 Zone 2 MG Reservoir(PBPW/Waterworks Capital) 391,100.00 To continue project not completed in 2005 55 Water Pump Stations Rehabilitations (PBPW/Waterworks Capital) 11,400.00 To continue project not completed in 2005 56 Maplewood Water Treatment(PBPW/Waterworks Capital) 396,700.00 To continue project not completed in 2005 57 Improvements Construction Duvall Ave NE(PBPW/Waterworks Capital) 100,000.00 To continue project not completed in 2005 58 Emergency Power to Pump Station(PBPW/Waterworks Capital) 104,200.00 To continue project not completed in 2005 59 Water System Security(PBPW/Waterworks Capital) 40,000.00 To continue project not completed in 2005 Water Utility Construction Fund(Fund 425)Total 1,476,700.00 Waste Water Utility Construction Fund-Carryforward 60 1,200,000.00 Sanitary Sewer Main Extension(PBPW/Sewer Capital) Sunset Interceptor Phase III(400,000)has design delays of approximately 9 months, requiring funds to be carried forward due to King County billings. Central Plateau Interceptor Phase II(400,000)carry forward design contract funds per Council action in 2005. Carry forward for oversizing at Wedgwood Lift Station. 61 Lift Station Repl/Rehab(PBPW/Sewer Capital) 30,000.00 Lake Washington Flush and Misty Cove Lift Station Rehabilitation project is completed, but final close out costs will occur in 2006. 5 of 7 ORDINANCE NO. Attachment A Title and Description Amount 62 Sanitary Sewer Main Replacement(PBPW/Sewer Capital) 750,000.00 Projects not completed in 2005 include: Downtown Sewers(60,000); Earlington Sewer extension(350,000); Sanitary Sewer Model(100,000); SW 27th Street Sewer Stub (40,000);and Renton Center Extension(200,000). 63 Long Range WW Management Plan(PBPW/Sewer Capital) 42,000.00 To complete the plan in 2006 Waste Water Utility Construction Fund(Fund 426)Total 2,022,000.00 Surface Water Utility Construction Fund-Carryforward 64 Surface Water Utility System Plan(PBPW/Surface Water Capital) 191,000.00 Planned multi year project. Project delayed due to Ecology NPDES Permit requirements not being completed and other work priorities due to City transportation project. The Landing project, and WSDOT I-405 Projects 65 Small Drainage Projects Program(PBPW/Surface Water Capital) 79,000.00 Funding to complete the CBD Utility Replacement project on Wells and Williams Ave S for unplanned CIP needs 66 Lower Cedar River Sediment Mgmt Plan(PBPW/Surface Water Capital) 113,000.00 Funding for the Spawning Channel Replacement project has been delayed due to Army Corps of Engineers funding for the project was not approved. 67 Wetland Mitigation Bank Project(PBPW/Surface Water Capital) 31,000.00 Planned Multi year project with WSDOT 68 Renton Storm water Manual(PBPW/Surface Water Capital) 136,000.00 Planned multi year project.Project delayed due to Ecology NPDES Permit requirements not being completed and other work priorities due to City transportation project,The Landing project, and WSDOT I-405 Projects 69 Springbrook Creek FEMA Floodplain Map(PBPW/Surface Water Capital) 55,000.00 Planned multi year project.Project delayed due to FEMA review and requirements for additional technical work. 70 N 26th St&Park Place N Storm Improvmt(PBPW/Surface Water Capital) 202,500.00 Funding to finish project not completed in 2005. Project delayed due to not being able to secure the required project easements from property owners 71 May Creek Basin Plan CIP Implementation(PBPW/Surface Water Capital) 399,500.00 Planned multi year project.Funding is needed for construction in 2006 6 of 7 ORDINANCE NO. Attachment A Title and Description Amount 72 SW 34th Street Culvert Replacement(PBPW/Surface Water Capital) 49,500.00 Planned multi year project.Funding is needed to complete project design in 2006 with construction planned for 2007 73 Renton Village Storm Systems Improvement(PBPW/Surface Water Capital) 288,500.00 Planned multi-year project.Funding is needed to complete design and construction in 2006 provided permits and required easement are obtained for the project Surface Water Utility Construction Fund (Fund 427)Total 1,545,000.00 Insurance Fund-Carryforward 74 General Government/Liab-prop Claims(Insurance Fund) 750,000.00 Property/Liability claim for$750,000 not settled in 2005. This amount was removed from reserves and appropriated in 2005 Insurance Fund(Fund 502)Total 750,000.00 Information Services Fund-Carryforward 75 Computer Replacement(Information Services) 14,000.00 The State granted the Court twelve computers.These computers are used to access the Judicial Information System and conduct the usual day-to-day business of the court. 76 Systems Projects(Information Services) 208,000.00 Maintenance Task Management,New World Systems,Web Site Refresh, Library Dynix Upgrade 77 Network Projects(Information Services) 25,000.00 Wireless Network Project has one remaining elevated water tower to which radio and antenna equipment must be installed 78 Council Dais Monitors (Information Services) 12,000.00 Replacement of the council dais monitors in the council chambers and related equipment Information Services Fund(Fund 503)Total 259,000.00 7 of 7 1s4readln3 V-/7-06. //dv/J/rai /V A(406 CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON ORDINANCE NO. 5O 3 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON ANNEXING CERTAIN TERRITORY OF THE CITY OF RENTON (HOQUTAM ANNEXATION; FILE NO. A-05-002) WHEREAS, under the provisions of RCW 35A.14.120, as amended, a petition in writing requesting that certain territory contiguous to the City of Renton, as described below, be annexed to the City of Renton, was presented and filed with the City Clerk on or about February 28, 2005; and WHEREAS, prior to the filing and circulation of said petition for annexation to the City of Renton, the petitioning owners notified the City Council of their intention to commence such proceedings as provided by law, as more particularly specified in RCW 35A.14.120, and upon public hearing thereon, it having been determined and the petitioning owners having agreed to assume their fair share of the pre-existing outstanding indebtedness of the City of Renton as it pertains to the territory petitioned to be annexed; and to accept that portion of the City's Comprehensive Plan as it pertains to the territory including the applicable Zoning Code relating thereto; and WHEREAS, the King County Department of Assessments has examined and verified the signatures on the petition for annexation on or about August 1, 2005, and determined that the signatures represent at least sixty percent (60%) of the area to be annexed's assessed value (excluding streets), as provided by law; and 1 ORDINANCE NO. WHEREAS, the Economic Development, Neighborhoods and Strategic Planning Department of the City of Renton having considered and recommended the annexing of said property to the City of Renton; and WHEREAS, the City Council fixed September 26, 2005, in the City Council Chambers, City Hall, Renton, Washington, as the time and place for public hearing upon the petition and notice thereof having been given as provided by law; and WHEREAS, pursuant to said notices public hearings have been held at the time and place specified in the notices, and the Council having considered all matters in connection with the petition and further determined that all legal requirements and procedures of the law applicable to the petition method for annexation have been met; and WHEREAS, the King County Boundary Review Board having deemed the "Notice of Intention" approved as of February 7, 2006; and WHEREAS, the City of Renton is concurrently zoning the annexation site R-8, eight units per net acre; NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON, DOES ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS: SECTION L All requirements of the law in regard to the annexation by petition method, including the provisions of RCW 35A.14.120, 130, 140 and 150, have been met. The petition for annexation to the City of Renton of the property and territory described below is hereby approved and granted; the following described property, being contiguous to the City limits of the City of Renton, is hereby annexed to the City of Renton, and such annexation shall be effective on and after the approval, passage, and publication of this Ordinance; and on and 2 ORDINANCE NO. after said date the property shall constitute a part of the City of Renton and shall be subject to all its laws and ordinances then and thereafter in force and effect; the property being described as follows: See Exhibit "A" attached hereto and made a part hereof as if fully set forth herein, [Said property, approximately 20.5 acres, is generally located immediately north of NE 6 Street, if extended, and east of 140' Avenue SE, if extended to 144' Avenue SE. It is bordered by SE 120 ' Street, if extended, on the north] and the owners of the property within the annexation shall assume their fair share of the outstanding indebtedness of the City of Renton as prescribed in RCW 35A.14.120 as it pertains to the property, and-the-property shall subject to the City's Comprehensive Plan and-Zoning Code. SECTION II. This Ordinance shall be effective upon its passage, approval, and five days after its publication. A certified copy of this Ordinance shall be filed with the King County Council, State of Washington, and as otherwise provided by law. PASSED BY THE CITY COUNCIL this day of , 2006. Bonnie I. Walton, City Clerk APPROVED BY THE MAYOR this day of , 2006. Kathy Keolker, Mayor 3 ORDINANCE NO. Approved as to form: Lawrence J. Warren, City Attorney Date of Publication: ORD.1253:3/29/06:ma 4 Exhibit "A" HOQUIAM ANNEXATION LEGAL DESCRIPTION That portion of the south half(1/2) of the northwest quarter of the southeast quarter of Section 10, Township 23 North, Range 5 East, W.M. in King County, Washington, lying northerly of the existing City Limits of Renton as annexed by Ordinance No.4924; TOGETHER WITH the south 30 feet of the northwest quarter of the northwest quarter of the southeast quarter of said Section 10, said south 30 feet also being known as SE 122nd Street; and TOGETHER WITH the south 30 feet of the west 30 feet of the northeast quarter of the northwest quarter of the southeast quarter of said Section 10, said parcel also being known as a portion of SE 142nd Street. - i _ ,,, ■m r� —� ■ IB _____._____ S A a 1 �, w Z �t� ,---�-- %,• 411 MEM I�■ o1= 11111111111 ►\ ARE _ •E 4 uIIIIIIII ill lalikalt is /: ;NIB IX L--J - 111111 `_ -*auL ------k--------_, ri-I __---:--- flan A '. ' ii ....1111-111 - ilifit st d , ==----, in a w'��'� I ► i minim � a �Il 111 I1�. swum III G�;t mu lib loll Ki 11;m, 1\ 11111 (1 Mill 4am gram mo 1 '=alin -� i III I: : �I`iwII Er) gm =m ,uf ►il1inrita 1" wi11�ii midn I.egit . maim r :g.kw IP Oram mum m nromi4 Pa 111. 1111. N�rIR'O ♦III: ♦ / .� y ■ Iaw �i111►: ��IIh / 111..,1 > alm a 'Din ►�� __�__ �■ ��� IS _D�1111� E%/IIMa t E 6th St i�tt Ir'. ddi Elinif1111 ".• Ilia ' 11��:11■� 9 i _ :tell Pa 1111.WE ■III NMI ■• �� -E 1®A 6 �� NM i t•71J C ffr, t•] �-� j IE. I w E � ME w.aA1 WO ® �I �� + EMU ISM IE liE. wra -G3 -G9- Fa Mil 1� I��Iu111111 1 Ball I' �� > 1 El �� lar = in..,.1111M wag r� ����� _E y = :LI � Emma ,Hn :: I NM Ji.11 L)7E I4tf St ",i. Iti= JIIEi■I� _ �■��- lil��� �.1111.�1111 V 'th :1! is iI•C21■:' , . I .I II"1a 11121 .L.,.- 1111x4': . : p a�1 i . si I iii •. I_ . . maim NI nilLII ` d - 11 M MPHdill" RA _,. .1,,, Nam s.- SE 1 'nd 't N€ Ani g■igin■ �� lr- ��• !Irk�a� wito IP. Iva sr II g.1, ■ w �Iali 0111 NI ‘b �- �� -- N z ■'11T,,.,takil•k. AI y RI Imp IOW 411 11C. 11111 ' - ' _ `,, =1�1 4--7 IV 4 di m1, � /�F� gip 1F5 A1111111 -C Cr)--.'' . � /1_I /gym **AA I mi �I J clrf I,b1,441x3,1 S�� �I► 1 Proposed Hoquiam Annexation 0 800 1600 Figure 1: Vicinity Map Site Boundary iiii:':':>;::`'::: ——— City Limits 1 : 9600 • Economic Development,Neighborhoods&Strategic Planning +( Alex Pietsch,Administrator Del Rosario • G.1 March 2005 jread/ 4/-1101 dopkd -O( CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON ORDINANCE NO. Ji�O AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON ESTABLISHING THE ZONING CLASSIFICATION OF CERTAIN PROPERTY ANNEXED WITHIN THE CITY OF RENTON AS R-8 (RESIDENTIAL 8 DU/AC; EIGHT DWELLING UNITS PER ACRE) (HOQUTAM ANNEXATION,FILE NO. A-05-002). WHEREAS, under Section 4.2.020 of Chapter 2,Zoning Districts—Uses and Standards, of Title W (Development Regulations) of Ordinance No. 4260 entitled "Code of General Ordinances of the City of Renton, Washington," as amended, and the maps and reports adopted in conjunction therewith, the property hereinbelow described has not been zoned in the City of Renton; and WHEREAS, the property owners petitioned the City of Renton for annexation and concurrent rezoning, which annexation having previously been approved and the property annexed to the City of Renton, and the City having held two public hearings to consider this zoning application, the first hearing being held on September 26, 2005, and the second hearing being held on April 17, 2006, and the zoning request being in conformity with the City's Comprehensive Plan, as amended, and the City Council having considered all matters relevant thereto, and all parties having been heard appearing in support thereof or in opposition thereto; NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON, DOES ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS: SECTION L The following described property in the City of Renton is hereby zoned as R-8 as hereinbelow specified. The annual ordinance adopting the maps of the City's zoning ordinance is hereby amended to evidence said rezoning and the Economic Development, 1 ORDINANCE NO. Neighborhoods and Strategic Planning Administrator is hereby authorized and directed to change the maps of the zoning ordinance, as amended,to evidence said rezoning, to wit: See Exhibit"A" attached hereto and made a part hereof as if fully set forth herein [Said property, approximately 20.5 acres, is generally located immediately north of NE 6th Street, if extended, and east of 140th Avenue SE, if extended to 144t Avenue SE. It is bordered by SE 120th Street, if extended, on the north.] SECTION IL This ordinance shall be effective upon its passage, approval, and five days after its publication. PASSED BY THE CITY COUNCIL this day of , 2006. Bonnie I. Walton, City Clerk APPROVED BY THE MAYOR this day of , 2006. Kathy Keolker, Mayor Approved as to form: Lawrence J. Warren, City Attorney Date of Publication: ORD.1254:3/29/06:ma 2 Exhibit "A" HOQUTAM ANNEXATION PREZONE(R-8) LEGAL DESCRIPTION The south half(1/2)of the Northwest quarter of the Southeast quarter of Section 10, Township 23 North, Range 5 East, W.M. in King County, Washington, lying northerly of the existing City Limits of Renton as annexed by Ordinance No. 4924; LESS roads. -I__I--i'MINIM - Aral ■ IF IIIP .7..........r. miiiiiril ii, „„im N glii ■ iIIiirrii - IiIIITk 1 1 . - VIII w _ liii ."milw: rill II LI go "4 4 10,, < Iliii. al ..... gal .. kid 1111 0 =er > 11111 1 <c 1111111 = all I IN la 141 Cr11 iIIi.. .. "II IF mil il 111:1111III Proposed Hoquiam Annexation R-8 Zoning Map 0 300 600 ,1' • Economic Development,Neighborhoods&Strategic Planning R-8 Zoning Akx Piet�ch,Adni uisrrator 1 3 600 � c.Del ttnsarirr ——— City Limits FN 0 18 January 2006 is . readin3 41- /70( /9dopkat 9-.2V-06 CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON ORDINANCE NO. 5,0`�.0S AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON, ANNEXING CERTAIN TERRITORY OF THE CITY OF RENTON (FALK II ANNEXATION; FILE NO. A-04-007) WHEREAS, under the provisions of RCW 35A.14.120, as amended, and SSB 5409, a petition in writing requesting that certain territory contiguous to the City of Renton, as described below, be annexed to the City of Renton, was presented and filed with the City Clerk on or about October 18, 2004; and WHEREAS, prior to the filing and circulation of said petition for annexation to the City of Renton, the petitioning owners notified the City Council of their intention to commence such proceedings as provided by law, as more particularly specified in RCW 35A.14.120 and SSB 5409, and upon public hearing thereon, it having been determined and the petitioning owners having agreed to assume their fair share of the pre-existing outstanding indebtedness of the City of Renton as it pertains to the territory petitioned to be annexed; and to accept that portion of the City's Comprehensive Plan as it pertains to the territory including the applicable Zoning Code relating thereto; and WHEREAS, the King County Department of Assessments has examined and verified the signatures on the petition for annexation on or about June 7, 2005, and determined that the signatures represent a majority of the area to be annexed's assessed value (excluding streets), as provided by law; and WHEREAS, the King County Records, Elections and Licensing Services Division has examined and verified the signatures on the petition for annexation on or about June 28, 2005, 1 ORDINANCE NO. and determined that the signatures represent a majority of the registered voters of the area to be annexed; and WHEREAS, the Economic Development, Neighborhoods and Strategic Planning Department of the City of Renton having considered and recommended the annexing of the property to the City of Renton; and WHEREAS, the City Council fixed August 1, 2005, in the City Council Chambers, City Hall, Renton, Washington, as the time and place for public hearing upon the petition and notice thereof having been given as provided by law; and WHEREAS, pursuant to said notices public hearings have been held at the time and place specified in the notices, and the Council having considered all matters in connection with the petition and further determined that all legal requirements and procedures of the law applicable to the petition method for annexation have been met; and WHEREAS, the King County Boundary Review Board having deemed the "Notice of Intention" approved as of January 5, 2006; and WHEREAS, the City of Renton is concurrently zoning the annexation site R-8, eight units per net acre; NOW, 'THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON, DOES ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS: SECTION L All requirements of the law in regard to the annexation by petition method, including the provisions of RCW 35A.14.120, 130, 140, 150, and SSB 5409 have been met. The petition for annexation to the City of Renton of the property and territory described below is hereby approved and granted; the following described property, being contiguous to the 2 ORDINANCE NO. City limits of the City of Renton, is hereby annexed to the City of Renton, and such annexation shall be effective on and after the approval, passage, and publication of this Ordinance; and on and after said date the property shall constitute a part of the City of Renton and shall be subject to all its laws and ordinances then and thereafter in force and effect;the property being described as follows: See Exhibit "A" attached hereto and made a part hereof as if fully set forth herein, [Said property, approximately 6.29 acres, is generally located immediately south of the north side of SE 185th Street, if extended, on the north, the east side of 102nd Avenue SE, on the east, a line parallel and some 428 feet south of the northern boundary on the south, and approximately 100th Avenue SE, if extended, on the west] and the owners of the property within the annexation shall assume their fair share of the outstanding indebtedness of the City of Renton as prescribed in RCW 35A.14.120 as it pertains to the property, and the property shall be subject to the City's Comprehensive Plan and Zoning Code. SECTION IL This Ordinance shall be effective upon its passage, approval, and five days after its publication. A certified copy of this Ordinance shall be filed with the King County Council, State of Washington, and as otherwise provided by law. PASSED BY THE CITY COUNCIL this day of , 2006. Bonnie I. Walton, City Clerk 3 ORDINANCE NO. APPROVED BY THE MAYOR this day of , 2006. Kathy Keolker, Mayor Approved as to form: Lawrence J. Warren, City Attorney Date of Publication: ORD.1251:3/29/06:ma 4 Exhibit "A" • FALK II ANNEXATION LEGAL DESCRIPTION That portion of the south half(1/2)of the Northwest quarter of the Northwest quarter of the Southwest quarter of Section 32, Township 23 North,Range 5 East, W.M., King County, Washington, lying southerly of the south line of the north 72 feet thereof; EXCEPT the east 20 feet thereof; TOGETHER WITH the north quarter(1/4)of the Southwest quarter of the Northwest quarter of the Southwest quarter of said Section 32; EXCEPT the east 20 feet thereof; TOGETHER WITH that portion of the west 30 feet of the east half(1/2), and that portion of the east 20 feet of the west half(1/2), of the Northwest quarter of the Southwest quarter of said Section 32, lying northerly of the south line of the north quarter(1/4)of the Southwest quarter of the Northwest quarter of the Southwest quarter of said Section 32, extended easterly, and southerly of a line described as follows: Beginning said line at a point on the west boundary line of the plat of Windsor Heights, as recorded in Volume 173 of Plat,Pages 28 through 30, inclusive, records of King County, Washington, said point being 102.80 feet southerly of the northwest corner of said plat and also being a point on the easterly right- of-way margin of 102"d Ave SE; Thence westerly along said line, said line being perpendicular to said plat boundary line and right-of-way margin, crossing 102"Ave SE, to an intersection with the westerly right-of-way margin of 102"d Ave SE and the termination point of said line. 1 Ni- -art 1 i tirr -- . --Ai . . *49 MP 'P (1, , NO 10 rir > .,c top* S4Aff As tk,, 7.:000 3gdSt - G • 1 ._ O pip - c--)N An§ Q� 0 � ■� 1 ill 0Ili 111111 i 45t iii , 7 1 1 ilmm, pummum commakt o mu III ■o UMW in •in", �i nig 1 Omni■■/1 a ■10��•��4�j 1011111.1 if -6 or if,:a 1k minim° I ill4._D, =lulu it i•iii -vim airs__ Emma, I is Ina�.4.-- ..mg...i li1.1 "1 ` Illi; tIàI. „all rmal- 1 .■........ - j ■'iRI nal a NI IflhIIf111111 fil/ atenni � ipmow,- i n St grilltdb,11 11111 .1■1 » 11111 I LII -_, var iii ■■i■ hf ga ■ 0 0i ■ ■ ■© III I. II. Proposed Falk II Annexation 0 600 1200 Figure 1: Vicinity Map :....:;..:;:.:.;:.::.... • Economic Development Neighborhoods&Strategic Planning — — — City Limits 1 : /200 Aka Pknic AAnimsuaior c.nei ttuaario Proposed Annex.Area k.�-ir`- %November 2004 1'4 tread/n5 V-17-66 4do okd CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON ORDINANCE NO. 5o(o AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON ESTABLISHING THE ZONING CLASSIFICATION OF CERTAIN PROPERTY ANNEXED WITHIN THE CITY OF RENTON AS R-8 (RESIDENTIAL 8 DU/AC, EIGHT DWELLING UNITS PER ACRE) (FALK II ANNEXATION,FILE NO. A-04-007). WHEREAS,under Section 4.2.020 of Chapter 2,Zoning Districts—Uses and Standards, of Title IV (Development Regulations) of Ordinance No. 4260 entitled "Code of General Ordinances of the City of Renton, Washington," as amended, and the maps and reports adopted in conjunction therewith, the property hereinbelow described has not been zoned in the City of Renton; and WHEREAS, the property owners petitioned the City of Renton for annexation and concurrent rezoning, which annexation having previously been approved and the property annexed to the City of Renton, and the City having held two public hearings to consider this zoning application, the first hearing being held on August 1, 2005, and the second hearing being held on April 17, 2006, and the zoning request being in conformity with the City's Comprehensive Plan, as amended, and the City Council having considered all matters relevant thereto, and all parties having been heard appearing in support thereof or in opposition thereto; NOW, 'THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON, DOES ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS: SECTION L The following described property in the City of Renton is hereby zoned as R-8 as hereinbelow specified. The annual ordinance adopting the maps of the City's zoning ordinance is hereby amended to evidence said rezoning and the Economic Development, 1 ORDINANCE NO. Neighborhoods and Strategic Planning Administrator is hereby authorized and directed to change the maps of the zoning ordinance, as amended, to evidence said rezoning, to wit: See Exhibit "A" attached hereto and made a part hereof as if fully set forth herein [Said property, approximately 6.29 acres, is generally located immediately south of the north side of SE 185th Street, if extended, on the north, the east side of 102nd Avenue SE, on the east, a line parallel and some 428 feet south of the northern boundary on the south, and approximately 100th Avenue SE, if extended, on the west.] SECTION II. This ordinance shall be effective upon its passage, approval, and five days after its publication. PASSED BY THE CITY COUNCIL this day of , 2006. Bonnie I. Walton, City Clerk APPROVED BY THE MAYOR this day of , 2006. Kathy Keolker,Mayor Approved as to form: Lawrence J. Warren, City Attorney Date of Publication: ORD.1252:3/29/06:ma 2 Exhibit "A" FALK II ANNEXATION LEGAL DESCRIPTION That portion of the south half(1/2)of the Northwest quarter of the Northwest quarter of the Southwest quarter of Section 32, Township 23 North, Range 5 East, W.M., King County, Washington, lying southerly of the south line of the north 72 feet thereof; EXCEPT the east 20 feet thereof; TOGETHER WITH the north quarter(1/4)of the Southwest quarter of the Northwest quarter of the Southwest quarter of said Section 32;EXCEPT the east-20 feet thereof; TOGETHER WITH that portion of the west 30 feet of the east half(1/2), and that portion of the east 20 feet of the west half(1/2),of the Northwest quarter of the Southwest quarter of said Section 32, lying northerly of the south line of the north quarter(1/4)of the Southwest quarter of the Northwest quarter of the Southwest quarter of said Section 32, extended easterly, and southerly of a line described as follows: Beginning said line at a point on the west boundary line of the plat of Windsor Heights, as recorded in Volume 173 of Plat,Pages 28 through 30, inclusive, records of King County, Washington, said point being 102.80 feet southerly of the northwest corner of said plat and also being a point on the easterly right- of-way margin of 102nd Ave SE; Thence westerly along said line, said line being perpendicular to said plat boundary line and right-of-way margin,crossing 102nd Ave SE, to an intersection with the westerly right-of-way margin of 102nd Ave SE and the termination point of said line. 1 -11.1 wiTI _ to r 1 1 i 1 , 1 . 11 0 Cf) d fti _'• NO/ ifs I , 1 < 04001. ilUilmi o S43Sti C-'° , I i NAN o, ° . 11111 45t ME 1 1 _till 17 i J ilfilP ■■1Fii-01 ,11 mummIN 1:112Iniimo ( --\ 1 en al Iwo% AI In , o ,,,,:-.,5,,._„,„.,,,,,,„ it3I ;4 im !„_„,,,,,w mow 0 mg rim MI game. -; illail - Ili MIN 0- MIMI I am IN �� $Illi ��►:�_ di I I 1111111. ■ r�e , I ea I 1 E spun s... .ja. ,c2 1 Edirain IWO' ' 5 III:IIIIHH 41,1 ■%I��asl�� g � I thSt i I . i JJiIiIiIidiiNIi es P rii_ , 1 o ��■ rj ;_ III Falk II Annexation 0 600 1200 Proposed Zoning Map 1 :;::: ; : ::;::>::::;:: • Economic Development,Neighborhoods&Strategic Planning — -- -M- City Limits 1 : 7200 . . Ai.Pietsch,Administrator R-8 Zoning Del Rosario .0_ G.10 Deccmber 2004 )3treadM q-17-06 9 Ildo led ./.•“1-06 CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON ORDINANCE NO. 50?407 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON, AMENDING ORDINANCE NO. 5142 BY CHANGING THE TIMING FOR EFFECTUATING PHASE II OF THE MERRITT II ANNEXATION TO THE CITY OF RENTON (MERRITT II ANNEXATION; FILE NO. A-03-003) WHEREAS, in Ordinance 5142, the effective date of the Merritt II annexation to the City of Renton, Phase II of the annexation has to be twelve (12) months after the adoption of that ordinance; and WHEREAS, Ordinance 5142 became effective on June 1, 2005, five days after its publication; and WHEREAS,Phase II would become part of the City of Renton on, or about June 1, 2006, unless Ordinance 5142 is amended; and WHEREAS, it is necessary to extend the effective date of Phase II of the Merritt II annexation; NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON, DOES ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS: SECTION I. Properties within Phase II (see Exhibit A) shall constitute a part of the City of Renton on March 31, 2007, and shall be subject to all its laws and ordinances then and thereafter in force and effect; the property being described as follows: See Exhibit A attached hereto, and made a part here of as if fully set forth herein. 1 ORDINANCE NO. [Said property, approximately 47.93 acres, is primarily located in the West Y2 of Section 3, Township 23 North, Range 5 East, of the 133-acre expanded annexation area. The northern portion of this phase is located in the West '/2 of Section 34, Township 24 North, Range 5 East.] SECTION II. This Ordinance shall be effective upon its passage, approval, and five days after its publication. A certified copy of this Ordinance shall be filed with the King County Council, State of Washington, and as otherwise provided by law. PASSED BY THE CITY COUNCIL this day of , 2006. Bonnie I. Walton, City Clerk APPROVED BY THE MAYOR this day of , 2006. Kathy Keolker, Mayor Approved as to form: Lawrence J. Warren, City Attorney Date of Publication: ORD.1255:4/7/06:ma 2 MERRITT II ANNEXATION—PHASE II LEGAL DESCRIPTION That portion of Government Lot 3, Section 3,Township 23 North,Range 5 East,W.M., in King County, Washington,lying northeasterly and easterly of the existing City Limits of Renton, as annexed by Ordinance No. 4055,and southerly and easterly of the existing City Limits of Newcastle, as incorporated by Resolution No. 45 in September 1994; TOGETHER WITH that portion of the southeast quarter of the northwest quarter of Section 3,Township 23 North,Range 5 East, W.M.,in King County, Washington, lying westerly of the west boundary line of Newcastle Terrace, as recorded in Volume 87 of Plats,Page 30,Records of King County,Washington, northerly of the existing City Limits of Renton as annexed by Ordinance No. 3972,and easterly of the existing City Limits of Renton as annexed by Ordinance No.4055;and TOGETHER WITH that portion of the southeast quarter of the southwest quarter of Section 34,Township 24 North,Range 5 East,W.B.,in King County,Washington,lying southerly of the northerly right-of-way margin of SE May Valley Road, said northerly right-of-way margin also being the existing City Limits of Newcastle, as incorporated by Resolution No. 45 in September 1994,and easterly of the easterly right-of-way margin of Coal Creek Parkway SE,said easterly right-of-way margin also being the existing City Limits of Newcastle, as incorporated by Resolution No.45 in September 1994. �\ - ISP - -I - EXIIIB-IIT-B.1 ', s / I __ ---, W ,111 Q w l s -,..„, _. . . -,„„,„ ,, ,, ,_,, , -- ., : -_,■IE,. Mq 0I Nip 9 �rolly Rd Q p.m -why - - - - ■ ,4v., ,it PO 1314- - - - --- - - : - - ------ 1 III �� ■ PAIN sig _ __ _ _- _ II it im � 1 . .0r IIIINIIPI New --._ 41/1,41111111111/► • ,'miiiiiiiii imbilianni : .--- .--__.1 __-_ _-_-,-___: - - oirmar-4.4or mum �.. ifsal . ♦,,v.I, umb ■ice ilt ��� v♦ ��•AI O moiaal■ 1111l411w •►. gi; Q►r ie. _,,,i,,,....01 r� 7 No La eta :� Alikikla 14111 ,�. 1►LlCItEt��j , �il�l.�i ������� 4:: a C��'j le j�111111 .. ll■ Y, ��ia . 11 ��� �ipIIL lu'�l��L�li �I.���� _ SE 1 ■ i� 111 1�I #411�� ii iI MM M 'pawn nil NM �: me ■ ♦ 0$y ♦ e ■� 'Ztiii�'i' 1211111111fMEI OWB!ag II ♦ G■ ow � .0.�� ■ IN INN a�tiuc �t!ltt!� �' L MN :4. �� :