Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
Council 08/07/2006
AGENDA RENTON CITY COUNCIL REGULAR MEETING '1August 7, 2006 Monday, 7 p.m. CAI440 ORDER AND PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE 2 ,ROLL CALL 3. SPECIAL PRESENTATIONS: a. Suburban cities Association Update b. Cable Franchise Renewal Update 4. PUBLIC HEARINGS: a. Annexation acid zoning of 340 acres(expanded from 60.5 acres) located in the vicinity of Maple Valley Hwy. (Maplewood Addition) b. Annexation and zoning of 24 acres (expanded from 7.18 acres) located in the vicinity of Hoquiam Ave.NE and SE 112th St. (Querin II) 5. ADMINISTRATIVE REPORT 6. AUDIENCE COMMENT (Speakers must sign up prior to the Council meeting. Each speaker is allowed five minutes. The comment period will be limited to one-half hour. The second audience . comment period later on in the agenda is unlimit in duration.) 11= When you are recognized by the Presiding Officer,please walk to the podium and state your name klitue and address for the record, SPELLING YOUR LAST NAME. 7. CONSENT AGENDA The following items are distributed to Councilmembers in advance for study and review, and the recommended actions will be accepted in a single motion. Any item may be removed for further discussion if requested by a Councilmember. a. Approval of Council meeting minutes of 7/17/2006. Council concur. b. City Clerk recommends approval to hire a temporary contract employee for public records processing assistance, at a cost of$35,000, for a term of four months. Refer to Finance Committee. c. City Clerk reports bid opening on 7/18/2006 for CAG-06-124, 2006 Citywide Sidewalk; two bids; engineer's estimate$370,793.50; and submits staff recommendation to award the contract to low bidder, Dennis R. Craig Construction, Inc., in the amount of$363,823.15. Council concur. d. City Clerk reports bid opening on 7/14/2006 for CAG-06-092, 2006 Street Overlay with Curb Ramps; three bids; engineer's estimate $1,100,734.14; and submits staff recommendation to award the contract to low bidder, Western Asphalt, Inc., in the amount of$1,048,553.89. Council concur. e. Court Case filed on behalf of Langley 4th Avenue Associates, LLC,by Ater Wynne LLP, Lawyers, 601 Union St., Suite 5450, Seattle, 98101, requesting denial of the Ridgeview Court Final Plat(FP-06-012)until the surface water drainage issues are corrected. Refer to City Attorney and Insurance Services. f. Community Services Department requests authorization to use funds in the amount of$20,000 from the Maplewood Golf Course reserve fund balance for water rights attorney fees to assist in perfecting a water rights claim. Refer to Finance Committee. ._ g. Economic Development, Neighborhoods and Strategic Planning Department recommends setting a public hearing on 9/11/2006 to consider future zoning for the remaining unincorporated portions of the East Renton Platen Potential Annexation Area. Refer to Planning Commission; set public hearing for 9/11/2006. (CONTINUED ON REVERSE SIDE) h. Economic Development,Neighborhoods and Strategic Planning Department recommends approval to amend the 2006 Budget to add authority to process payments for the$300,000 HUD BEDI grant awarded to the City for the I-405/NE 44th St. right-of-way plan. Council concur. (See 10. for ordinance.) i. Economic Development,Neighborhoods and Strategic Planning Department submits 60%Direct Petition to Annex for the proposed Leitch Annexation and recommends a public hearing be held on 8/21/2006 to consider the petition and future zoning; 14.59 acres located in the vicinity of 140th Ave. SE, 143rd Ave. SE, SE 136th St., and SE 138th St. Council concur. j. Hearing Examiner recommends approval, with conditions, of the Shy Creek Preliminary Plat; 61 single-family lots on 16.1 acres located in the vicinity of SE 2nd Pl.,NE 2nd St., and Jericho and Hoquiam Avenues NE (PP-06-009). Council concur. k. Transportation Systems Division recommends approval of an addendum to the Airport lease LAG-84-006, which: increases the rate, extends the term to 8/31/2016, and assigns the lease from Southcove Ventures, LLC to Aerodyne, LLC. Refer to Transportation (Aviation) Committee. 1. Transportation Systems Division recommends approval of a concurrence letter with Washington State Department of Transportation regarding the 1-405 Cedar River Vicinity Charette concept. Council concur. m. Transportation Systems Division submits the annual update of the Six-Year Transportation Improvement Program(TIP)and the Arterial Street Plan. Refer to Transportation(Aviation) Committee; set a public hearing on 8/21/2006 to consider the TIP. n. Utility Systems Division recommends approval of the Springbrook Creek Wetland and Habitat Mitigation Bank lot line adjustment map. Council concur. 8. CORRESPONDENCE a. Letter from Rebecca Wynsome and Gary Weil,3711 Lake Washington Blvd. N., Renton,98056, concerning the appeal of the Hearing Examiner's decision regarding the Provost variances application(V-06-024). Refer to Planning and Development Committee. b. Letter from Harry A. Kodis, 2619 Jones Ave. NE, Renton, 98056, requesting that the potential upper Kennydale area rezone via a 2006 Comprehensive Plan amendment be removed from consideration. Refer to Planning and Development Committee and Planning Commission. c. Letter from Keith Thompson, 660 Index Pl. NE, Renton, 98056, stating that he supports the Highlands area redevelopment effort; however, he opposes the possible rezone (from R-10 to R- 8)of his properties at 660 and 650 Index Pl. NE. Refer to Planning and Development Committee. 9. UNFINISHED BUSINESS Topics listed below were discussed in Council committees during the past week. Those topics marked with an asterisk(*)may include legislation. Committee reports on any topics may be held by the Chair if further review is necessary. a. Finance Committee: Vouchers b. Planning&Development Committee: Street Grid System c. Utilities Committee: Springbrook Creek Wetland&Habitat Mitigation Bank Agreements 10. RESOLUTIONS AND ORDINANCES Ordinance for first reading: 2006 Budget amendment re: HUD BEDI grant(see 7.h.) Ordinance for second and final reading: 2006 Budget amendment for public information and community outreach efforts (1st reading 7/17) 11. NEW BUSINESS (Includes Council Committee agenda topics; call 425-430-6512 for recorded information.) 12. AUDIENCE COMMENT 13. ADJOURNMENT (CONTINUED ON NEXT PAGE) COMMITTEE OF THE WHOLE AGENDA (Preceding Council Meeting) Council Chambers 5 p.m. Integrated Emergency Management Course Training Report; Washington State Department of Transportation's Concurrence Plan; Tri-Park Master Plan Update .• Hearing assistance devices for use in the Council Chambers are available upon request to the City Clerk • CITY COUNCIL MEETINGS ARE TELEVISED LIVE ON GOVERNMENT ACCESS CHANNEL 21 AND ARE RE-CABLECAST TUES.&THURS.AT 11 AM&9 PM,WED.&FRI.AT 9 AM&7 PM AND SAT.&SUN.AT 1 PM&9 PM RENTON CITY COUNCIL Regular Meeting August 7, 2006 Council Chambers Monday, 7 p.m. MINUTES Renton City Hall CALL TO ORDER Mayor Pro Tem Randy Corman called the meeting of the Renton City Council to order and led the Pledge of Allegiance to the flag. ROLL CALL OF MAYOR PRO TEM RANDY CORMAN; DON PERSSON; MARCIE COUNCILMEMBERS PALMER; TERRI BRIERE; DENIS LAW; DAN CLAWSON; TONI NELSON, Council President Pro Tern. CITY STAFF IN JAY COVINGTON, Chief Administrative Officer; LAWRENCE J. WARREN, ATTENDANCE City Attorney; MICHELE NEUMANN, Deputy City Clerk; GREGG ZIMMERMAN, Planning/Building/Public Works Administrator; ALEX PIETSCH, Economic Development Administrator; DON ERICKSON, Senior Planner; TERRY HIGASHIYAMA, Community Services Administrator; MARTY WINE, Assistant CAO; COMMANDER CHARLES MARSALISI, Police Department. SPECIAL Karen Goroski, Executive Director of the Suburban Cities Association(SCA), PRESENTATIONS stated that SCA underwent reorganization two years ago, and she described the SCA: Update association's structure. She noted that SCA appoints over 101 elected officials to county and regional boards and committees. Ms. Goroski reported that SCA's long range goals through 2010 fall under the following four categories: regional organization and governance, education,public policy leadership, and public benefit. Continuing, Ms. Goroski indicated that SCA will be reviewing a bylaw change concerning membership, and that its Public Issues Committee is focusing on regional issues this year. In regards to education, she reported that SCA has hosted four networking dinners this year, and the subject of the next dinner is transportation. Ms. Goroski announced that in partnership with the Association of Washington Cities, SCA will hold a day-long conference on sustainability on October 21. Ms. Goroski stated that SCA has taken public policy positions on topics such as regional water quality,the Automated Fingerprint Identification System levy, and county annexations. She noted that at the next Public Issues Committee meeting, members may take action on key issues such as Transit Now, and Puget Sound Regional Council's executive board membership representation and growth scenarios. In conclusion,Ms. Goroski encouraged Councilmembers to participate in the networking dinners, and to attend the sustainability conference. City Clerk: Cable Television Assistant CAO Marty Wine introduced Michael Bradley who is a partner with Franchise Renewal Update the firm Bradley and Guzzetta. She explained that the firm was retained to assist the City with the cable franchise renewal process. Mr. Bradley stated that as part of the renewal process, he is ascertaining Comcast's compliance with its existing franchise with the City; therefore, Dick Nielsen with CBG Communications has been engaged to conduct a technical audit of the Comcast cable system. Mr. Nielsen explained that he will be evaluating how Comcast is doing from a technical viewpoint,which includes reviewing picture quality,number of services offered,reliability, and Federal Communications Commission 1. August 7,2006 Renton City Council Minutes Page 259 specifications compliance. Additionally, he will be inspecting the cable company's physical plant throughout the City to ensure that the company is up to code, that its facilities are aesthetically pleasing, and that it will be able to provide services well into the future. PUBLIC HEARINGS This being the date set and proper notices having been posted and published in Annexation: Maplewood accordance with local and State laws,Mayor Pro Tem Corman opened the Addition, Maple Valley Hwy public hearing to consider the proposed expanded annexation and zoning of 345 acres bounded on the north primarily by SE Renton-Maple Valley Hwy. (SR- 169), on the south by the Cedar River Valley ridgeline, on the west by 130th Ave. SE, and on the east by 164th Ave. SE, if extended (Maplewood Addition). Senior Planner Don Erickson reported on the history of the annexation proposal, pointing out that the City invoked the Boundary Review Board's(BRB) jurisdiction for consideration of expanding the area from the original 60.5 acres. He noted that after holding two hearings on the expanded annexation,the BRB issued its decision on 6/10/2006. Mr. Erickson reviewed the reasons why Renton requested expansion of the original annexation as well as the findings associated with the BRB-approved expanded annexation area,which include the following: consistency with relevant countywide planning policies, BRB objectives, and City policies; protection of sole source aquifers from which both Renton and Maplewood Water Cooperative derive their potable water; availability of high quality emergency response to both flooding and landslides; and protection of Renton's public investment in the Maplewood Golf Course, Ron Regis Park,and the Cedar River Trail from potentially adverse land uses. He pointed out that the BRB found that the expansion will provide property owners and residents a voice in planning for the area's future, and result in the most logical and discernable neighborhood boundaries based upon its natural features. Continuing, Mr. Erickson reported that the area contains approximately 360 single-family units, 237 multi-family units, 94,479 square feet of commercial space,and 1,330 residents. Reviewing the public services, he noted that the area is served by Renton water and sewer, Maplewood Water Cooperative, Cedar River Water and Sewer District, Fire Districts#25 and#40, and Renton and Tahoma school districts. In regards to the fiscal analysis, Mr. Erickson indicated that the net estimated annual fiscal cost to the City is $45,149. Mr. Erickson stated that current King County zoning is R-6 (six dwelling units per gross acre), R-12, and Neighborhood Business. Renton's Comprehensive Plan designates all but a small portion of the annexation area as Residential Low Density (RLD). He explained that two Comprehensive Plan amendments are being considered this year to address the King County commercial zoning and the mobile home park use: 1) a map amendment to allow commercial zoning, and 2)a text amendment to allow Residential Manufactured Home Park(RMH) zoning in the RLD designation. Mr. Erickson indicated that Wonderland Estates and Condominium mobile home parks are proposed to receive RMH zoning, and a small portion of the former Aqua Barn site that fronts SR-169 is proposed to be zoned Commercial Arterial. Public comment was invited. Christine Ivy Nelson-Groves, 15400 SE 155th Pl., #88, Renton, 98058, stated that she resides in the manufactured home community east of the Aqua Barn property, and she inquired as to the timing of the annexation approval process. August 7,2006 Renton City Council Minutes Page 260 Mr. Erickson explained that the second zoning hearing on this expanded annexation is anticipated to be held in November 2006, after consideration of the Comprehensive Plan amendments by the Planning Commission and then by the Council. Robert Hunt, 15625 156th Pl. SE, Renton, 98058, spoke in favor of the annexation, saying that Renton is one of the better run local governments in the State. Mr. Hunt stated that the Elliott Farm, located across the street from Ron Regis Park, is protected by the King County Landmarks Commission and he questioned what the fate of that protection will be under Renton's jurisdiction. He also noted that the current owner has failed to maintain the property as required by the commission. City Attorney Larry Warren indicated that Renton does not have a landmark protection ordinance; therefore, the matter as well as the code enforcement issues will have to be reviewed. Raymond A. Breeden, Sr., 15279 Maple Dr., Renton, 98058, stated that he is a resident of Wonderland Estates mobile home park. He reported that the park's residents have formed an association, and 98 percent of the residents are willing to purchase the property. David Wulz, 15400 SE 155th Pl., #3, Renton, 98058, expressed his appreciation for Mr. Erickson's presentation as well as for the information mailed to his residence. Mr. Wulz indicated that he is pleased with Renton's services and parks. Della Penner, 15255 150th Lane SE, Renton, 98058, voiced her objection to being part of the expanded annexation. Correspondence was read from David L. Halinen, Halinen Law Offices,P'.S., 2115 N. 30th St., Suite 203,Tacoma, 98403, stating that his client, Aqua Barn Ranch, Inc., owns two parcels of commercially zoned property in the annexation area. Mr. Halinen asked that the annexation be deferred to allow the 2006 Comprehensive Plan amendment process to be completed so the parcels come into the City with a Commercial Corridor land use map designation and concurrent Commercial Arterial zoning. There being no further public comment, it was MOVED BY BRIERE, SECONDED BY NELSON, COUNCIL CLOSE THE PUBLIC HEARING. CARRIED. MOVED BY BRIERE, SECONDED BY CLAWSON, COUNCIL: ACCEPT THE DECISION OF THE BOUNDARY REVIEW BOARD EXPANDING THE BOUNDARIES OF THE MAPLEWOOD ADDITION ANNEXATION FROM 60.5 ACRES TO APPROXIMATELY 345 ACRES; CONSIDER FUTURE ZONING CONSISTENT WITH THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN LAND USE MAP AS AMENDED AND AMENDED RESIDENTIAL LOW DENSITY TEXT AT THE TIME OF ANNEXATION; AND DIRECT STAFF TO PREPARE THE RELEVANT ORDINANCES FOR CONSIDERATION AT THE SECOND REQUIRED PUBLIC HEARING ON ZONING. CARRIED. Annexation: Querin II, This being the date set and proper notices having been posted and published in Hoquiam Ave NE accordance with local and State laws,Mayor Pro Tem Corman opened the public hearing to consider the proposed expanded annexation and zoning of 24 August 7,2006 Renton City Council Minutes Page 261 acres bounded by NE Sunset Blvd. on the north, SE 114th St., if extended, on the south, Hoquiam Ave. NE and 141st Ave. SE, if extended, on the west, and 144th Ave. SE on the east(Querin II). Senior Planner Don Erickson reported that the Boundary Review Board held two public hearings on the expanded annexation area in May 2006, and issued its findings and decisions supporting the expansion in July 2006. He pointed out that expansion of the area prevents the creation of an island that could result if the Aster Park annexation area to the east is annexed to Renton. Mr. Erickson explained that the area contains 17 existing single-family homes and five vacant parcels. The western portion of the site is relatively flat whereas the eastern portion contains up to 30% slopes along the Honey Creek channel. Additionally, a Type 2 wetland exists near the middle of the area. Reviewing the public services, Mr. Erickson stated that the area is served by Fire District#25, Water District#90, Renton sewer, and the Renton School District. He noted that the area is currently zoned R-4 (four dwelling units per gross acre) in King County, and the City's Comprehensive Plan designates the area as Residential Low Density and Residential Single Family, for which R-4 (four dwelling units per net acre)and R-8 zoning are proposed. In regards to the fiscal impact analysis, Mr. Erickson estimated a deficit of$3,215 at current development, a surplus of$22,695 at full development, and a one-time parks acquisition and development cost of$40,498. In conclusion,Mr. Erickson indicated that the expanded annexation proposal is consistent with City policies and Boundary Review Board objectives. Public comment was invited. There being none, it was MOVED BY LAW, SECONDED BY NELSON, COUNCIL CLOSE THE PUBLIC HEARING. CARRIED. MOVED BY BRIERE, SECONDED BY LAW, COUNCIL: ACCEPT THE DECISION OF THE BOUNDARY REVIEW BOARD EXPANDING THE BOUNDARIES OF THE QUERIN II ANNEXATION FROM 7.18 ACRES TO APPROXIMATELY 24 ACRES;CONSIDER FUTURE R-4 AND R-8 ZONING CONSISTENT WITH THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AT THE TIME OF ANNEXATION; AND DIRECT STAFF TO PREPARE THE RELEVANT ORDINANCES FOR CONSIDERATION AT THE SECOND REQUIRED PUBLIC HEARING ON ZONING. CARRIED. ADMINISTRATIVE Chief Administrative Officer Jay Covington reviewed a written administrative REPORT report summarizing the City's recent progress towards goals and work programs adopted as part of its business plan for 2006 and beyond. Items noted included: * Nominations for Renton Citizen of the Year are being accepted through August 31. Visit the City's web site at www.ci.renton.wa.us for more information. * The Lake Washington Bicycle Trail, located along the west side of I-405 from the northern City limits to Ripley Lane, will be closed for construction from August 14 until the evening of August 19. * The third and final open house regarding the re-master planning for Liberty Park, Cedar River Park, and the Narco Property, referred to as the Tri-Park Master Plan, will be held at the.Renton Community Center on August 16. August 7,2006 Renton City Council Minutes Page 262 AUDIENCE COMMENT Sandel DeMastus, Highlands Community Association(HCA)Vice President, Citizen Comment: DeMastus- PO Box 2041, Renton, 98056, expressed her displeasure with the handling of Planning Commission, the Planning Commission meeting on August 2. On another subject, she Highlands Community announced that Councilman Randy Corman will be a guest speaker at the HCA Association meeting scheduled for August 17. Councilman Clawson indicated that the City has some of the best staff it has ever had,and though mistakes do occur, he is proud of every City staff member. Mayor Pro Tem Corman commented that staff members occasionally find themselves in the crossfire between the citizens and the elected officials setting policy. Citizen Comment: McOmber- Howard McOmber,475 Olympia Ave. NE, Renton, 98056, expressed his Highlands Area interest in moving forward with the Highlands area improvement program, Redevelopment saying that he is looking forward to working with the City on zoning and improvement issues. Mr. McOmber stated his hope that meetings will soon occur with the Council and City staff for the exchange of ideas regarding improving the Highlands area. Citizen Comment: Beden- The Laurie Beden, 2014 Queen Ave. NE, Renton, 98056, voiced her support for The Landing Project Landing project, stating that the project will benefit Renton citizens by providing additional housing, employment, entertainment, and nearby shopping facilities. Ms. Beden commented on the non-profit organization opposing the project called Alliance for the South End, and on her discussion with Peter Buck of Buck& Gordon, who represents the non-profit organization and Westfield, owner of Westfield Southcenter Mall. She encouraged the Mayor and Council to continue to move forward with The Landing development. Citizen Comment: Petersen - Inez Somerville Petersen, Highlands Community Association(HCA) Secretary, Records Request, Highlands PO Box 2041, Renton, 98056, expressed her displeasure regarding the handling Area Redevelopment of her public records request for a City contract listing. On another subject, she indicated that the HCA is looking forward to meeting with the City on the Highlands area redevelopment effort and discussing the vision for the area. CONSENT AGENDA Items on the consent agenda are adopted by one motion which follows the listing. Council Meeting Minutes of Approval of Council meeting minutes of 7/17/2006. Council concur. 7/17/2006 City Clerk: Public Records City Clerk recommended approval to hire a temporary contract employee for Processing Assistance, public records processing assistance, at a cost of$21,000, for a minimum term Temporary Hire of four months. Refer to Finance Committee. CAG: 06-124, 2006 Citywide City Clerk reported bid opening on 7/18/2006 for CAG-06-124, 2006 Citywide Sidewalk, Dennis R Craig Sidewalk; two bids; engineer's estimate $370,793.50; and submitted staff Construction recommendation to award the contract to low bidder, Dennis R. Craig Construction, Inc., in the amount of$363,823.15. Council concur. CAG: 06-092, 2006 Street City Clerk reported bid opening on 7/14/2006 for CAG-06-092, 2006 Street Overlay with Curb Ramps, Overlay with Curb Ramps; three bids; engineer's estimate $1,100,734.14; and Western Asphalt submitted staff recommendation to award the contract to low bidder, Western Asphalt, Inc., in the amount of$1,048,553.89. Council concur. Court Case: Langley 4th Court Case filed on behalf of Langley 4th Avenue Associates, LLC,by Ater Avenue Associates, CRT-06- Wynne LLP, Lawyers, 601 Union St., Suite 5450, Seattle, 98101, requesting 002 denial of the Ridgeview Court Final Plat(FP-06-012) until the surface water drainage issues are corrected. Refer to City Attorney and Insurance Services. August 7,2006 Renton City Council Minutes Page 263 Community Services: Community Services Department requested authorization to use funds in the Maplewood Golf Course amount of$20,000 from the Maplewood Golf Course reserve fund balance for Reserve Fund Use, Water water rights attorney fees to assist in perfecting a water rights claim. Refer to Rights Attorney Fees, Budget Finance Committee. Amend Planning: East Renton Plateau Economic Development, Neighborhoods and Strategic Planning Department PAA Future Zoning recommended setting a public hearing on 9/11/2006 to consider future zoning for the remaining unincorporated portions of the East Renton Plateau Potential Annexation Area. Refer to Planning Commission; set public hearing for 9/11/2006. Planning: I-405/NE 44th St Economic Development,Neighborhoods and Strategic Planning Department ROW Plan, HUD Grant recommended approval to amend the 2006 Budget to add authority to process Payment Processing, Budget payments for the$300,000 HUD BEDI (Housing and Urban Development Amend Brownfield Economic Development Initiative) grant awarded to the City for the I-405/NE 44th St. right-of-way plan. Council concur. (See page 265 for ordinance.) Annexation: Leitch, SE 136th Economic Development,Neighborhoods and Strategic Planning Department St& 140th Ave SE submitted 60%Direct Petition to Annex for the proposed Leitch Annexation and recommended a public hearing be held on 8/21/2006 to consider the petition and future zoning; 14.59 acres located in the vicinity of 140th Ave. SE, 143rd Ave. SE, SE 136th St., and SE 138th St. Council concur. Plat: Shy Creek,Jericho Ave Hearing Examiner recommended approval,with conditions, of the Shy Creek NE&NE 2nd St, PP-06-009 Preliminary Plat; 61 single-family lots on 16.1 acres located in the vicinity of SE 2nd Pl.,NE 2nd St., and Jericho and Hoquiam Avenues NE. Council concur. Airport: Aerodyne Lease, Transportation Systems Division recommended approval of an addendum to the Addendum#12, LAG-84-006 airport lease LAG-84-006, which: increases the rate, extends the term to 8/31/2016, and assigns the lease from Southcove Ventures, LLC to Aerodyne, LLC. Refer to Transportation(Aviation)Committee. WSDOT: 1-405 Cedar River Transportation Systems Division recommended approval of a concurrence letter Vicinity Charette Concept with Washington State Department of Transportation regarding the I-405 Cedar Concurrence River Vicinity Charette concept. Council concur. Transportation: 2007-2012 TIP Transportation Systems Division submitted the annual update of the Six-Year Transportation Improvement Program(TIP) and Arterial Street Plan. Refer to Transportation(Aviation) Committee; set public hearing on 8/21/2006 to consider the TIP. Utility: Springbrook Creek Utility Systems Division recommended approval of the Springbrook Creek Wetland & Habitat Mitigation Wetland and Habitat Mitigation Bank lot line adjustment map. Council concur. Bank Lot Line Adjustment Map MOVED BY NELSON, SECONDED BY CLAWSON, COUNCIL APPROVE THE CONSENT AGENDA AS PRESENTED. CARRIED. CORRESPONDENCE A letter was read from Rebecca Wynsome and Gary Weil, 3711 Lake Citizen Comment: Washington Blvd. N., Renton, 98056,concerning the appeal of the Hearing Wynsome/Weil - Provost Examiner's decision regarding the Provost variances application. MOVED BY Variances Appeal,Alan & CLAWSON, SECONDED BY BRIERE, COUNCIL REFER THIS Cynthia Provost, V-06-024 CORRESPONDENCE TO THE PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT COMMITTEE. CARRIED. • August 7,2006 Renton City Council Minutes Page 264 Citizen Comment: Kodis- A letter was read from Harry A. Kodis, 2619 Jones Ave. NE, Renton, 98056, 2006 Comprehensive Plan requesting that the potential upper Kennydale area rezone via a 2006 Amendments, Upper Comprehensive Plan amendment be removed from consideration. MOVED BY Kennydale Area Rezone CLAWSON, SECONDED BY BRIERE,COUNCIL REFER THIS CORRESPONDENCE TO THE PLANNING COMMISSION AND PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT COMMITTEE. Citizen Comment: Thompson - A letter was read from Keith Thompson, 660 Index P1. NE, Renton, 98056, Highlands Area stating that he supports the Highlands area redevelopment effort; however, he Redevelopment opposes the possible rezone (from R-10 to R-8) of his properties at 660 and 650 Index P1. NE. MOVED BY BRIERE, SECONDED BY CLAWSON, COUNCIL REFER THIS CORRESPONDENCE TO THE PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT COMMITTEE. UNFINISHED BUSINESS Finance Committee Chair Persson presented a report recommending approval of Finance Committee Claim Vouchers 250358 - 250779 and two wire transfers totaling Finance: Vouchers $3,750,164.41; and approval of Payroll Vouchers 64425 - 64791, one wire transfer, and 648 direct deposits totaling$2,156,653.50. MOVED BY PERSSON, SECONDED BY LAW, COUNCIL CONCUR IN THE COMMITTEE REPORT. CARRIED. Planning& Development Planning and Development Committee Chair Briere presented a report Committee recommending concurrence in the staff recommendation that the Street Grid Planning: Street Grid System System(City Code Title 9, Section 11)be amended as follows: Amendments • Newly annexed areas will retain their current addresses, except those areas in the East Renton Plateau west of 160th Ave. SE, north of Maple Valley Hwy., and south of May Valley Rd. • Addresses in the East Renton Plateau west of 160th Ave. SE, north of Maple Valley Hwy., and south of Maple Valley Rd., will be readdressed according to the adopted street naming system. • SE May Valley Rd. would retain its name and numbering system, and the portion of the roadway known as NE 31st St. would be restored to its original numbering system and name. • 156th Ave. SE will be renamed Vantage Blvd. NE south of NE 4th St., Vantage Pl. NE north of NE 4th St.,and Vantage Ct. SE south of SE 142nd Pl. • Vantage Blvd. will continue to the Maple Valley Hwy. along SE 142nd Pl. (between 154th Ave. SE and 156th Ave. SE) and 154th Pl. SE. • Vesta Ave. NE will be returned to its original name and numbering system (156th Ave. SE), until such time that all segments of 156th Ave. SE north of SE 136th St./NE 2nd Ct. are annexed into the City of Renton. • 68th Ave. S., south of Martin Luther King Way, will be renamed Monster Rd. SW. • SE Can Rd., SE 179th St., SE 176th St.,and SE Petrovitsky Rd. shall be named SE Carr Rd. west of 108th Ave. SE and SE Petrovitsky Rd. east of 108th Ave. SE. • SE Renton-Maple Valley Rd. shall be renamed Maple Valley Hwy. The Committee further recommended that the ordinance regarding this matter be prepared for first reading. MOVED BY BRIERE, SECONDED BY CLAWSON, COUNCIL CONCUR IN THE COMMITTEE REPORT.* Councilwoman Briere noted that the Committee report was revised to reflect comments made by citizens at the public hearing held on the matter. In response to Mayor Pro Tem Corman's inquiry, Councilwoman Briere explained August 7,2006 Renton City Council Minutes Page 265 that as a result of a recent annexation, a portion of SE May Valley Rd. was renamed to NE 31st St.; however, due to the roadway's regional significance, the name is being changed back to SE May Valley Rd. Additionally,she noted that most newly annexed areas will keep their current King County street grid system addresses. *MOTION CARRIED. Utilities Committee Utilities Committee Chair Clawson presented a report recommending Utility: Springbrook Creek concurrence in the staff recommendation to approve the following agreements Wetland & Habitat Mitigation associated with the Springbrook Creek Wetland and Habitat Mitigation Bank Bank Instrument with and forward to the Mayor and City Clerk to sign the agreements in accordance WSDOT, Additional with Resolution 3822, adopted by Council on 6/19/2006: Agreements • Bank Oversight Committee/Co-Sponsors Memorandum of Agreement. • Washington State Department of Transportation(WSDOT)/City of Renton Springbrook Creek Wetland and Habitat Mitigation Bank Agreement. • Conservation Easement, Reimbursement Agreement with the Cascade Land Conservancy, and Assignment Agreement. The approval of City funding to include the construction of the Springbrook Trail, as proposed in the Springbrook Creek Wetland and Habitat Mitigation Bank project, will be made separately following the Washington State Department of Transportation construction contract bid opening for the project. MOVED BY CLAWSON, SECONDED BY BRIERE, COUNCIL CONCUR IN THE COMMITTEE REPORT. CARRIED. Chief Administrative Officer Jay Covington stated that this project has been a long,hard-fought effort,and he recognized the work of Utility Engineering Supervisor Ron Straka and other staff members. Stressing that the mitigation bank will benefit Renton, City Attorney Larry Warren shared how the City acquired the property, and he acknowledged the City's foresight in recognizing its future possibilities. Mr. Covington explained that as development occurs in the City, developers have to mitigate for any impact to wetlands. Rather than having a number of small areas that are designated for wetland mitigation,the City will create in the aforementioned property an ecosystem that works as a wetland. He pointed out that developers pay into an account that is then used to enhance the wetland. Councilwoman Briere noted that a trail is proposed to go through this property and connect an existing trail system. Mr. Straka explained that WSDOT will be conducting the mitigation bank construction in exchange for half of the shares of credits for investing the capital, and the City will receive the remaining credits. He indicated that WSDOT is a significant partner in this project, and he recognized the agency's efforts. Mr. Straka stressed that this is a good project from an environmental, transportation, City, and public standpoint because it will allow the City to sell credits to developers who can then develop their sites to a higher and better use. RESOLUTIONS AND The following ordinance was presented for first reading and referred to the ORDINANCES Council meeting of 8/14/2006 for second and final reading: Planning: I-405/NE 44th St An ordinance was read amending the 2006 Budget by creating a revenue ROW Plan, HUD Grant account for receipt of funds from the HUD BEDI (Housing and Urban Payment Processing, Budget Development Brownfield Economic Development Initiative) Grant#B-02-SP- Amend WA-0758 in the amount of$300,000 granted to the City, to reimburse expenses August 7,2006 Renton City Council Minutes Page 266 under CAG-05-127 with HDR Engineering for$50,000 and CAG-05-097 with Washington State Department of Transportation,project CGA4310, for $250,000, and declaring an emergency. MOVED BY NELSON, SECONDED BY PERSSON, COUNCIL REFER THE ORDINANCE FOR SECOND AND FINAL READING ON 8/14/2006. CARRIED. The following ordinance was presented for second and final reading and adoption: Ordinance#5216 An ordinance was read amending the 2006 Budget by transferring funds in the EDNSP: Annexation amount of$70,000 from the 2005 year-end fund balance for the purpose of Community Outreach, PRR public information and community outreach efforts related to annexation and Contract, Budget Amend incorporation, with $60,087 going to PRR, Inc. to conduct that work, and declaring an emergency. MOVED BY NELSON, SECONDED BY PALMER, COUNCIL ADOPT THE ORDINANCE AS READ. ROLL CALL: ALL AYES. CARRIED. NEW BUSINESS MOVED BY PERSSON, SECONDED BY LAW, COUNCIL REFER THE Council: Liaison Position RECLASSIFICATION OF THE COUNCIL LIAISON POSITION TO Reclassification FINANCE COMMITTEE. CARRIED. Development Services: MOVED BY BRIERE, SECONDED BY PERSSON, COUNCIL REFER JEFF Variance Fee Waiver Request, COLEE'S VARIANCE FEE WAIVER REQUEST TO FINANCE Fence Height, Colee COMMITTEE. CARRIED. Council: Communication Councilman Clawson expressed his concerns regarding Council communication, and he noted that if necessary, skilled mediators can be employed to help work through difficult situations. Community Services: Sockeye Councilman Clawson stated that this year's Lake Washington Sockeye salmon Salmon Fishing Season fishing season is a result of salmon recovery efforts, and he expressed his appreciation for the City's work on those efforts. Councilwoman Briere relayed comments she received regarding the well-run boat launch at Gene Coulon Memorial Beach Park. AUDIENCE COMMENT Sandel DeMastus, PO Box 2041, Renton, 98056, said she is an independent Citizen Comment: DeMastus - producer with public access cable channel 77, and reported that she is working Lake Hills Greenbelt on a program about the Lake Hills Greenbelt Blueberry Farm located in Lake Blueberry Farm Cable Hills Greenbelt Park in Bellevue. Ms. DeMastus described the park's amenities, Program and suggested that this type of park would be well-received in Renton. Citizen Comment: Petersen- Inez Petersen, PO Box 2041, Renton, 98056, noted the City funds set aside for Highlands Area the Highlands study area infrastructure improvements, and expressed her hope Redevelopment, Annexation that improvements can be completed prior to the winter season. Additionally, Community Outreach she indicated that the Highlands Community Association wants Council to hire an independent facilitator to assist with the Highlands area redevelopment project. On another subject, Ms. Petersen noted the possibility of City- generated information placed in local newspapers concerning annexation, and she expressed her concern regarding potential improprieties in light of the September 19, 2006,vote on the Fairwood Incorporation. Board/Commission: Highlands In response to Mayor Pro Tern Corman's inquiry, Chief Administrative Officer Area Citizens Advisory Jay Covington confirmed that the matter concerning a citizens advisory Committee committee for the Highlands area was referred to Planning and Development Committee on 6/19/2006. August 7,2006 Renton City Council Minutes Page 267 EXECUTIVE SESSION MOVED BY NELSON, SECONDED BY PERSSON, COUNCIL RECESS AND ADJOURNMENT INTO EXECUTIVE SESSION FOR APPROXIMATELY 30 MINUTES TO DISCUSS LITIGATION AND PROPERTY ACQUISITION WITH NO OFFICIAL ACTION TO BE TAKEN AND THAT THE COUNCIL MEETING BE ADJOURNED WHEN THE EXECUTIVE SESSION IS ADJOURNED. CARRIED. Time: 8:57 p.m. Executive session was conducted. There was no action taken. The executive session and and the Council meeting adjourned at 9:58 p.m. iAf3r4A.G J. LIJ 2Lt Bonnie I. Walton, CMC, City Clerk Recorder: Michele Neumann August 7, 2006 RENTON CITY COUNCIL COMMITTEE MEETING CALENDAR Office of the City Clerk COUNCIL COMMITTEE MEETINGS SCHEDULED AT CITY COUNCIL MEETING August 7, 2006 COMMITTEE/CHAIRMAN DATE/TIME AGENDA COMMITTEE OF THE WHOLE MON., 8/14 CANCELLED (Corman) COMMUNITY SERVICES (Nelson) FINANCE MON., 8/14 Vouchers; (Persson) 4 p.m. Council Liaison Reclassification PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT (Briere) PUBLIC SAFETY (Law) TRANSPORTATION(AVIATION) (Palmer) UTILITIES (Clawson) NOTE: Committee of the Whole meetings are held in the Council Chambers unless otherwise noted. All other committee meetings are held in the Council Conference Room unless otherwise noted. aim Suburban Cities Association of King County SCA Board of Directors (13 directors) Executive Committee Executive Director I I Staff Consultants Public Issues Education Revenue Other Committee Committee Committee Committees I I Small Cities Dues Subcommittee Subcommittee +' 1111.11 MINN rai Imo 1111111111611111.1. 1111111111111111111111111111111111111 SCA Long Range Goals through 2010 Regional • Organization and Education Public Policy Public Benefit Governance Leadership To be a Puget Sound regional To be a center for professional To provide leadership in the To implement a plan to raise organization that successfully development of local electeds development of a cohesive community awareess and promotes the SCA vision on regional issues model for citizens and business respect for local government by throughout the region to thrive in any jurisdiction providing analysis and through growth management, solutions on regional issues To operate under a governance transportation, and jobs. while educating the public on structure that effectively issues that affect their quality recognizes the special interests To provide leadership in of life of small cities, rural cities, restructuring regional and urban cities within a governance regional framework MIMI MEI Attachment 8 Board of Directors Agenda January!11,200Minia 6 MI MIN MEI 1111111111 SCA 2006 Work Plan Goals Action Responsibility Date of *Measures of Accomplishments Completion Regional Organization 1. Approval of the associate and Governance membership guidelines 2. Increase in the numbers of those involved in the activities 1. Define new membership categories la)Identify potential markets la)Board and 9/06 of SCA to make SCA more of a regional for new SCA members in Staff 3. Feedback from membership association region 4. Balanced budgeting lb)Draft proposed changes to lb)Board and 9/06 5. Customer satisfaction on dues the bylaws for approval by Staff 6. Membership retention and members recruitment 7. Development of non-dues 2. Identify non-dues revenues 2a)Identify cost effective 2a)Board 5/06 revenue opportunities goods and services needed by 8. Increase participation in small members cities subcommittee 2b)Identify partners to supply 2b)Revenue 9/06 9. Feedback from regional needed goods and services Committee relationships 10.Number of new partners 3. Develop a closer working 3a)Convene workgroup to 3a) Staff 1/06 relationship with the city discuss possibilities for closer managers/city administrators collaboration 3b)Recommend to Board any 3b) Staff 4/06 changes that need to be made to enhance relationship with CM/CA 3c)Implement changes in 3c)Board and 12/06 SCA structure to enhance Staff relationship with CM/CA Page 1 of 3 Attachment 8 Board of Directors Agenda January 11,2006 4. Conduct a customer satisfaction 4a)Research tools from both 4a) Staff 4/06 survey government and associations 4b)Conduct survey 4b Staff 9/06 5. Develop an SCA marketing plan 5a)Based on outcome of 5a)Board and 12/06 proposed changes in bylaws— Staff develop plan 6. Continue outreach to members 6a)Target members with 6a)ED 12/06 newly elected mayors, city managers, and city councils that have dramatically changed 7.Provide resources to accomplish 7a)Identify staffing needs and 7a)Revenue 3/06 short and long range goals resources to implement goals Committee&ED Education 11. Completion of at least one successful educational program 1. Identify opportunities for education la)Develop list of speakers la)Education 2/06 12. Numbers of new partners of electeds on regional policy issues for SCA Networking dinners Committee ib)Identify potential partners lb)Education 5/06 for collaboration on Committee and educational offerings CM/CA lc)Host regional educational 1c)Board et al 11/06 offering Public Policy Leadership 13. How well are we regionally and nationally recognized 1. Identify and pursue windows of la)Use the Caucus la)Board 1/06 14. Number of calls from policy opportunity in 2006 for specific Orientation to identify makers before policies are policy issues regional issues consistent with made the SCA Board Goals for 15. Successful resolution/progress 2010 on public policy issues lb)Increase communications lb)PIC Chair and Ongoing 16.Application of public policy and direction between SCA Staff position Caucuses and PIC 17.Number of issues passed Page 2 of 3 Attachment 8 Board of Directors Agenda January 11,2006 through the PIC and adopted by. 2. Use 2010 goals with SCA vision, 2a)Always have the SCA 2a)Staff Ongoing the Board values and mission for guidance at vision statement and 2010 18. What public policy changes PIC meetings public policy goals present at have we been able to affect and the PIC meeting sustain 19.Adopt a marketing plan to 3. Turn public policy positions into 3a)Develop a process to 3a) SCA Board 3/06 communicate positions action identify level of support and 20. Numbers of new partners process for SCA positions 4. Increase collaboration with the KC 4a)Continue regular meetings 4a) SCA Board Ongoing Executive's Office with County Executive President,PIC Chair, and ED 5. Enhance relationship with Chair, 5a)Hold regular meetings 5a) SCA Board Ongoing King County Council with Chair President, Chair of PIC, and ED Public Benefit 21. Favorable press 22.Feedback re public opinion 1.Develop and implement a strategy la)Provide outreach to la)Board and ED Ongoing 23. Numbers of new partners for SCA to educate the public on members of the KC County issues that affect their quality of life Council 2.Develop a strategy to raise 2a)Develop best practices 2a)CM/CA. 7/06 community awareness and respect for models to post on SCA local government by providing website analysis and solutions on regional issues * Measures of Accomplishments were taken from the Board retreat Page 3 of 3 Proposed Schedule for-SCA PIC Discussions and Action „.. , Issue First Discussion Possible Action t #1Growth Alternatives April 12,2006 May4-0July 12,2006 #3 Park And Ride Lot Fees April 12,2006 June 14,2006 #6 Waste Export Plan May 10,2006 June 14,2006 #13 Human Services Funding May 10,2006 June 14,2006 #25 Fair Housing Plans May 10,2006 June 14,2006 #43 BSNF May 10,2006 June 14,2006 #44 Waterborne Transit May 10,2006 June 14,2006 #9 Multi County Planning Policies June 14,2006 July 12,2006 #5 EMS Levy June 14, 2006 July 12,2006 #40 Prosperity Partnership June 14,2006 July 12,2006 #22 Capacity charges VSrate to pay for June 14,2006 July 12,2006 growth #32 Interlocal agreements with agencies to June 14,2006 July 12,2006 support long term bond sales #33 Financing Regional Water Quality June 14,2006 July 12,2006 #29 Siting a i;egional,airport_ June 14,2006 July 12,2006 #10 Transportation Plan Update July 12,2006 - August 9, 2006 - '#17 NEVIS Training July 12,2006 #28 PSRC Executive Board Membership July 12,2006 , Auust 9,2006 August 9,2006 September 13, 2006 #11 Regional Mental Health Jail September 13,2006 October 11,2006 #34 Reclaimed water - September 13,2006 October 11,2006.. October 11, 2006 November 8,2006 • #20 Mental Health Funding November 8,2006.. December 13, 2006 4 December 13,2006 January 10, 2007 #2 Six year Plan Development 1/10/07 2/14/07 #42 Fare Policies #45 Ride free-Zones 1/10/07 2/14/07 #20 Mental Health Funding 1/ 10/07 2/14/07 ZAShare\C Files\PUBLIC ISSUES COMMITTEE\PIC WORK PLAININSCA 2006 Regional Public Policy Issues Work Plan for PIC MAY.do -: --:--:• • .• .1: - , ' ": e• • ._ • :. • • •: • . - Plan-fer-PIGMAlklee 12 of 13 #12 Vision 2020+20 Update 2/14/07 3/14/07 #18 Work on Destination 2030 Update #26'Economic Development in Transportation #24 RTID.Troject list - 6/07 7/07, #7 SST(GMA and transportation/freight mobility $8 federal Funds regional VS county split #14 Transfer Stations #15 Disaster Planning #21 10 Year Plan to End Homelessness #19 Emergency Funds Distribution #27 Coordination with PSRC on designation of urban centers and allocation of jobs and housing #371&I #30 Adding to successful economic centers and identifying new areas #35( MPC Urban'Centers Study #39 With Growth comes resources #41 Transit Planning Framework Street Car services Allocation of Hours Bus shelters P1cy positions•,k • A ,„,.. , , Devehed #4 Annexation #31 Policy Framework for Federal Transportation funds • Z:\Share\Current,Eiles\PUBLIC ISSVES,COMMITTEMPIC WORKPLAN\SCA 2006 Regional Public Policy Issues Work Plan for PIC Plith-for.PW4i4A-Y-.4ea 13 of 13 • MEI Suburban Cities Association Public Policy Positions 111111111 2007 King County Annexations Members of the SCA will work with the County on annexations and recommend the following policy steps be taken: With regard to King County: 1. The Cities and the County should work cooperatively to find ways to condition new development in a PAA on meeting the City's standards. Immediate steps should be taken by the County to adopt development standards of the local annexation jurisdiction so that, until such time an area is annexed, no new development will be approved unless consistent with a city's standards 2. Local accounts for all impact fees or other annexation related revenues should be set up so that these revenues will be available to the respective local jurisdiction, upon annexation as a logical next step to the pilot program currently under discussion. 3. The County should evaluate its past investments in storm water and transportation in the unincorporated areas to identify upgrades needed to facilitate urban transition. 4. The County should phase out use of urban subsidies to supply urban level services in the urban unincorporated area. Proposed service policies and standards should be reviewed by the Regional Policy Committee (RPC). 5. Typically, the residents of unincorporated areas are not aware that they face declining levels of service under the jurisdiction of the County. The County should create and actively implement a strategy to encourage the support of local PAA residents for annexations. In doing so, the County should acknowledge that existing annexation law limits a City's ability to annex an area without the sufficient support of property owners and/or voters. The County should make every effort to educate the residents in the annexation areas about the inefficiencies in serving the current configuration of urban unincorporated King County,the recent trends related to the levels of service that the County provides, and about the likelihood that future County budget scenarios would require further cuts in service levels. It should also agree that the Executive, County Council and Sheriff actively support all resulting annexation proposals before the Boundary Review Board. To facilitate the annexation of PAAs, the County should dedicate a county revenue stream from within each PAA to support capital projects in those PAAs on a bonded debt or pay-as-you-go basis. The county or cities could use the revenue generated from within the PAA from this revenue stream to service bond debt for infrastructure financing. Proceeds will be used by the annexing jurisdictions to make capital improvements and/or support increased services, allowing the Cities to make the financial transition Adopted March 22,2006 by the SCA Board of Directors Page 1 of 2 Urban Density-MPPs SCA opposes adoption of any MPP that would establish a quantitative threshold for appropriate urban residential densities; as such policy would overly restrict local flexibility and discretion in planning for growth. • The state Growth Management Act gives cities and counties discretion in their comprehensive plans to make many choices about accommodating growth. • The suburban cities of King County are committed to encouraging and stimulating urban growth within their borders. The suburban cities will continue to accommodate their share of population growth for the current 20-year planning period and beyond, as forecast by the state Office of Financial Management, as targeted by CPPs, and as guided by an updated Vision 2020. • Residential growth in the county and region should 1)be focused within the existing UGA, 2)make efficient use of land, and 3) achieve a compact urban pattern of development containing a range of densities and uses. • In achieving these outcomes, decisions on specific land uses and densities should be based on local conditions and policy goals that are evaluated and balanced by local governments. Adopted July 19, 2006 by the SCA Board of Directors AFIS Levy SCA will send a letter of support to the King County Executive and King County Council to continue AFIS (Automated Fingerprint Identification System)as stated in Ordinance 2006-0264;this levy would be of six year duration and set a rate for 2007 of 5.68 cents per$1000 assessed value. Adopted July 19,2006 by the SCA Board of Directors Capacity Charges vs. Rate to Pay for Growth (RWQC) SCA supports the policy of growth pays for growth and encourage that language be added to our contracts to support that policy,but to recommend against applying a specific formula for calculation of the capacity charge within our Component Agency contracts. Adopted July 19,2006 by the SCA Board of Directors And Capacity Charge Methodology regarding CSO Costs SCA supports the revision of the capacity charge methodology to revise CSO costs from the shared customer category to the existing customer category. Adopted July 19,2006 by the SCA Board of Directors Interlocal Agreements with Agencies to Support Long-term Bond Sales SCA supports agency contracts that allow the County the full flexibility to finance the upcoming capital improvements at the County's standard bonding term, thus reducing future rate and capacity charge increases as needed. Adopted July 19,2006 by the SCA Board of Directors Financing Regional Water Quality (Culver Funding) (RWQC) SCA supports the position that while Culver funding is important to this region, the County, with its regional partners, need to look towards alternative funding sources for the Culver Program. Adopted July 19,2006 by the SCA Board of Directors Page 2 of 2 cV a. 111111111111111 1111111101111111111111111.1 11111111.11181111411118111111. SCA Public Issues Committee AGENDA August 9,2006—7:00PM Renton City Hall 1055 S.Grady Way Renton,WA 98055 • Welcome and Roll Call • Introductions of guests • Approval of minutes of July 12,2006 meeting (Attachment 1) • Potential Action Items 1. Recommendation from the PIC Nominating Committee for Regional Water Quality Committee 2. PSRC Executive Board Membership(PSRC Executive Board) (Attachment 2) 3. Reclaimed Water (Attachment 3) 4. Transit Now (Attachments 4a&b) • Presentations/Updates 1. PSRC Growth Scenarios (GMPB) (Attachment 5) 2. EMAC Update (EMAC) • Reports 1. Small Cities Subcommittee—Katrina Asay 2. Executive Director's Report—Karen Goroski o Updated Schedule of Work • Other 1. For the good of the order 2. SCA Networking Dinner—September 20,2006 3. Next PIC Meeting—September 13,2006 Agenda: ✓ Action Items ✓ Regional Mental Health Jail Update • Adjourn �Y ;CI+ -NrcO MAPLEWOOD ADDITION ANNEXATION—EXPANDED PUBLIC HEARING CONSIDERATION OF EXPANDED ANNEXATION AREA AND FUTURE ZONING August 7, 2006 Tonight's hearing is the first of two required public hearings to consider zoning on the expanded Maplewood Addition annexation. The City is in receipt of the Boundary Review Board's (BRB) Findings and Decision regarding the expansion of the original 60.5-acre annexation site to 340-acres, pursuant to the request of the City. The expanded 340-acre site is within Renton's Potential Annexation Area and is bounded on the north primarily by the Renton— Maple Valley Highway (SR 169), on the south by the Cedar River and several steep slopes rising from the valley floor, and the east by the Valley View Mobile Home Park. The annexation area abuts the City of Renton to the west. There currently are an estimated 1,330 dwelling units within it. Currently, the subject site has King County's R-4, R-12, and Neighborhood Business zoning. County commercial zoning is inconsistent with Renton's Residential Comprehensive Plan designation. In addition, there are two mobile home parks within the annexation area that have R-10 zoning. Area residents have asked the City Council to consider Residential Manufactured Home Park (RMH) zoning for these areas upon annexation. The current Renton Comprehensive Plan is inconsistent with both County Commercial zoning and the mobile home park use. Consequently, the City is processing two Comprehensive Plan Amendments this year to address these issues: 1) a map amendment to allow commercial zoning and 2) a text amendment to allow RMH zoning as an implementing zone in the Low Density Residential designation. The seconding zoning hearing on this annexation will be held in November 2006 to allow Renton to first amend the Comprehensive Plan and then apply the zoning. The two mobile home parks, Wonderland Estates and the Condo Mobile Home Park, would receive RMH zoning. A small portion of the former Aqua Barn site that fronts SR 169 is proposed to be zoned Commercial Arterial (CA). This would allow proposed commercial development in the area to proceed. The remainder of the site would be zoned Renton's R-4 zone, consistent with the City's current Comprehensive Plan Land Use Map designation. Reviewing departments of the City have commented on this annexation and are generally supportive of it. If Council accepts the decision of the BRB's decision expanding the annexation boundaries to approximately 340-acres, the Administration is recommending that Council consider future zoning consistent with the amended Comprehensive Plan Land Use Map at the time of annexation and that it direct staff to prepare zoning and annexation ordinances for consideration at the second required public hearing on zoning in November 2006. Council Hearing Handout 08-07-06.doc\ uru ���p�c` iiii�i�i G Ala' �a ... umortito to mum sulYm ff'1f11m�� 11111.119116r1- L�Di1�1 MI rWEC11110NIr r ... 4%0 �/1� amino•1 t� 3;1 �j I' • iiii '1 __ _ 1..m si I! c r t ,. ■ eumi .� mini.��\\�'�. • nuu r, rri ,40 gUmit 1,k _ '��.r . .�►y�� F\ '— 111111\�r'r�u , r ern • Z._ �ls��D r .��.►X111 �I 1 I I . ESI�Im ;;:: .R ♦ as-1 tionU■u—J- i, a ���Vi�.0,� <�r� vim ■11 `. mg .ems It to.„i gt`fir*�1 ■ :mum C�ii. vuy L11 : ivi ik• if MN \1� � �I 4: �:�= =C3 C _�► 1! '�F1.�1 r • j .nr� Oil11 a� -. - - .. �.._..._. _�.•,.�� �► .N1 �r�LJ� %CIO\� �w►�..� 1 11 Ih sums■ w►\. ..pr 0�LL, �r prrrrrr ti ,� :marl C��tm mmI■I'" v0 144th t � 1 ■mmlm► •Vil W N, /eL II,vrjiw'lj:. � ill vs1=- �u11 =- IIiiIzJ 'col.1a1 .444♦ " �B11111111 1 oto oo`��► r'Ji•a Q¶ A1dUm!' !LLJI it s Dr SE ,'�'♦♦•�•1�s,11+'• Sf I� 1� AO's ,� ii . . . ,_ .' 'i 1,,'' • �� mr� ",'���•0111114 0 ea�4�`�w_�o,101 n uoPlealle IV' 4.' i C F pt;gai, ! 4 11•1 'N,141,.f rpile NI Nr."-otts=hi".a. - '4ibli ,-,_=... 11111A1,1 * fti.. Iii ar.r_._iiitifilkird ��,,.�•♦ •0• IIS♦• ' .'q \��ii� SE Ren I �. •,� b UV IIIII i�i • ir4a�•4644i ,i♦♦1 Q►111 'p��yl��% 'x.41111 , *i411 "lati7r it' . v s _ 111►i 11W• J , 11 X14:4 ; .4 -4 �■�11111 `��\,j/ I '�~lk -�;d1. N ..1•rnlp ♦I►I isits. It;•. 1.II U Or ' . •i rr fir \♦♦I ri♦��� V%� o . rr ru ICS.asf . 1►u C•!flbi /IslIf1�A�i� ♦ . . 1 . •Z. _- .■► r=vi r:ry li P.pl��. .■errr urli+i♦.111\� :pD� 1► I�►�413 -- — re At . .,,llrvr. ♦a Iir.. .1 `�hi��� ��• •aarn� �(01�11�11����U� i ' �111"I.p1■IIUI■1m•�wfas■■■um- im D �11l31f1 �lT������ ;Finnan! !•■■•■•■�: 41111111 _ 4. num!■■inik�t1m II IE'�Iz P. - , lmmura ',� �p�i���pc�iily'ii:pi\i1� vim:jam�.alrm*�I 4�R "I T1 --. ��illemp l w11�0♦du►`', 419 ZIR:iiri b 4,4�11k. • \Q� She r�cfl��� -i�IJ9WC1'I r1•♦1��I t. 2\t ♦ ♦1 a Q .t"-- 1 p:aou::�:•���9r'e;�Q i1��r►,ice ���i��i�J�J �11411\4'W� - t‘`.414 rr r....it s'•• 111!♦1 ♦ +l �� �� ♦ L' ,s ■ r r•.. A ,. aa4�S.c .,♦ �Ji �E91111 1 1 032S1rI� v�` i,',1``\P r so ■■■ii..c01 i I Lod •V I++4 II�1'� •1C1.� V1 !•!I;� .11 •10.• i t1i11l1 Ur 11 rrrr1r11rrrrl in` �aaa1111�1'1��TIIt� �I,��.��. p r�,�1�=IFS�i■moi , —"/1IS•Ii.:. G....•. I I:ma oi'rsi o •mov1,7 IIr1 ayes 1r a■ 7C 4 Qa.. :*,w car,„ 77��is ui 4��••�•�:n Ip1111rr ayes ���lJ`�Ij�'�,ls.rr: __ �— ►tr►.. TS'. Sia♦,4����.. 11--1§10'. 1/fit tb11 �.�i��I�r car Pr. I :AI ......41 wfr 4 �!n■ - �� .r! T.. 1441 a 00 r s�.1 ye»♦R♦.• . ming zmem 11`AA~ /�■ ,�'I `�A put C.!ulll a L! ri;4ri r - 1Y• I ♦ I,.yaj _ ll`J.i- ty y ♦1 �•1•r 0. •�'� v •�►♦�v I1I♦♦1�dl, `� 4$—.0....\. C7-- •m• r 11���� 1.. ,..Ij/ �111'I�I�11'!I �♦ � Q�1' ♦ !1 't II ' .a,i.1►� r w /�,..r i y wid ♦ . �ie� w i ■... A. • �� �I j�h: X11O% =O ..uniuui to.i111�=E ■ !wide* � �i'R1111!1!Ir.,n� h� ■■ .._ ram tr-_Mi..oat Rog IIR9 Maplewood Addition Vicinity 01 1500 3000 City Limits __] ) S O,t, Economic Development,Neighborhoods&Strategic Planning ♦ Alex Pietseb,Adminixvaioi Urban Growth Boundary 1 : 18000 ♦ G.Del Rosario Stud Area ., •> I May 2(X/6 Y .-::. - • Maplewood Addition . s. Annexation - Expanded -,, ,�.-, � Public Hearing on Zoning and "` BRB Expanded Boundaries August 7, 2006 '. Background for Original 60.5 Original Proposed 60.5 Acre Maplewood Acre Annexation Area Addition Annexation • In January 2005 Renton held public meeting • 60.5 Acres with proponents,accepting 10%Petition and ' authorizing 60%Petition • 161 s.f.dwellings ;.^s.�, • Renton received 60%Direct Petition in March :e "� ' 2005 • Abuts Maplewood j n" .v,T'' � �� Gardens •r�' , rn+t r • Council accepted 60%Direct Petition in April G o*, ., `c��7,'r�''' 2005 • Bordered on south - "1�-`ti'.1 a..',i and •..:r.''rte' • Notice of Intent sent to BRB on April 19,2005 Riverast by cedar =�.r'', • BRB Public hearings held on original 60.5-acre "i• r., area on March 20th and 241 2006 • Bordered on north lit'l=;s�r''''' i1;'• n. =',;'--,--,,-;:'-‘3'2,'4'•',: . , b 5R 169 c1.--. 1 Figure I. =.• s.f!i County Land Use Designation and Current Zoning ZBil,- • Urban Residential,med AR-6,SO (4-12 du/ac.) I-isi is 2 [‘ampl or hon,i_In'laplcxx d\dd tion Annexal on Asea ♦si w,..� 'L $ __._ fit ��• i Sole Source Aquifer • R-6,SO(6-9 du/ac) f•:«?�V t ,-, Both Renton and Maplewood ,' /�.,. - 1;i i Water cooperative derive their ,7 ''. .44./1 V potable water from sole source , j^ - Ill/ aquifers beneath the ; "` Cedar River �,. ,,�, ;,.42 -'. `� rtgurca-County'Zoning'lap Aqukt Pion:cum Area I-Expanded 1 0 Renton Land Use Designation Boundary Review Board for and Potential Zoning ..., King County RenUSC ton Conip Plan Land ��i„ Ks34IN -iJ • City invokes BRB's jurisdiction for I. consideration of expanded annexation area • Residential Lou Density ? • BRB holds public hearings on May 4th and Renton Zoning upon Annexation 8°',2006 • R-4,9 du/net acre ' • BRB issues decision and closing letter on • Los,er density consistent th 1i1� �" • June 10 ,2006 iuhi existing,f,r density 01'2.8 Erik Oth eacrc for area ���w='S'i� Figure 5-Renton Comp Plan Laud Use'lap Reasons why Renton requested ,'� 4" : 4 i � . . 4 �` rl . ,e nil t expansion of the original annexation Maga t ��la� 4� �� rdLns t )r < ' to x. ,'i°.: t k Sole source aquifer ° ji. °'; .; . Cedar River flooding,slides from adjacent -a iv,,, ° �'h4 �. hillsides, vl4 ,,0,74: ' +�Wulw � �; —Transportation impacts along the Renton-- , - !-1,.. ..-- ' �,i°e5..t ;d i , . Maple Valley Highway(SR-169) t �E ` i .,t illwp Faun lir::: �; �i n �� '� �"'t:onJatm —Renton needs to ensure that land uses across r'' from the Maplewood Golf Course and Ron :::!.."1-..-', �, .neEan>tR l � 1' Regis Park are compatible with its$9,000,000 t�,,,,R�` t, .*,.v' • „•.' � public investment there. Maplewood Addition Expansion Areas 19,0 000 1 Aerial ...�.,,,,w....,_... 1 ro-•.... r..,. - ....oowru...uaw.a.ir I I&xq Expansion as approved by BRB xM Background '. Area Single- Multi- Coming Estimated family family Space Population } Units Units ' 340 acres'360 237 units'9-1,470 s.t' 1,330 units " - . 2 General Findings General Findings, continued --Expansion consistent with relevant Countywide Planning Policies -Expansion helps ensure the availability of high quality emergency response to both Consistent with relevant Boundary Review flooding and landslides Board Objectives Consistent with City policies for annexation Protect Renton's considerable public investment in the Maplewood Golf Course, -Ensure protection of City's and Maplewood Regis Park,and Cedar River trail from Addition's Sole Source Aquifers potentially adverse land uses across the highway r,, `,, _ "` '� - Primarily parcels fronting on or Boundary Review Board .;:� �3. accessing from R4nton—Maple Findings & Decision _•s e , VaiieyUighway "' • Approved expansion would provide property owners/residents a voice in planning for future ' - • preservation and development of their �t>R " "''a -169- community °a'='s" _?.,. ,,-- — 1 • Approved expansion results in the most logical, 346 acres discernable neighborhood boundaries based upon 598 touts . natural features such as rivers,highways and 1330rsidenls 9�,a�o sr.cnmm�l. natural topography �'' Maplewood Addition Expansion Areas ,;x„ ;,„„, l 1 I1n1t N+s•..e Approved Expansion Existing Conditions - Public Services Utilitiesz; _ - Rater 1 _ yp • Renton Water flints ��l ” ". ' ,,,,,,., 'N, • Maplewood Add.Rater Coop F • 1 � `.1:...-,Ise • Cedar Riser vY&S District �� Sewer --,'C: '.,,.mar. 'i li *' �` ) • Renton Sewer Utility • Cedar Riser W&S District H ! • Eire e L — ow ...: .�, ,,_- Within both District 15& District 25 n� �",`t l ** „ • Schools g:" 1 F ""' Q Renton School District i� 'ag.. 4isure 12-111.'1 a60lb of cane}lloor,ho,illy,ca losing Iopogr,�phy 300 to 400'Ant: Tahoma School District(0.56 acre) � ��' 3 Existing Conditions - Public Services Fiscal Impact Analysis Water Utility • General Fund cost and revenue implications Districts t - DISTRICT 90 Assumes average assessed value of$279,000 t -Assumes a new home value of$400,000 w.. N � Assumes Renton's current Level of Service* Expanded es.^Li--- j Assumes City responsibility for streets and state CEDAR RIVER (--.3-'7highway per RCW 47.24.020 WATER AN} "--i SEWER DIST. C_ 'Renton spends an estimated$3,036 per capita for municipal sen-ices P11441,4 , .. ' y r erste S512 per capita proposed in 2006 for City of Fainrood Figure 15-Water Districts Map Existing Land Use Designation and Estimated Fiscal Impact Current Zoning K.C.Land Use Map-Urban Residential-4-12 du/ac and Neighborhood Business ����Costs �17nUa K.G.Zoning-R-6,R-I2,and NB(Neigh.Business) 2006aKt Revenues Impact s L,(=Gi ;, t � � "RP � ` '' $674,876 ($720,025 ($45,149) � . .h.R, � � uta f R-6!'b4 a . lithe. is `l.._\ -_ uu -,_ ,-'- Pipit;I6-County Zoning Slap Existing Land Use Designation Possible Relevant Comp Plan Land Use Map Amendment Renton Comp Plan Land Use Map-Residential Low Density(RLD)* ' # , Y •Change RLD to Corridor *as of Nov.'05 Commercial Comp Plan " _.% ,!;;14.,',i,:'` tr,7rr-, g.., with CA zoning for 3.02 , �"' . ., ' .*` tevn"� i acres of former Aqua Bal ,„ � .--;-: ,� ' site this year .>y:1; , '".�-- Zanew ,x -� - " = w •Review remainder of 1 ! a' , t4,I27the corridor in 2007 S,rsi '''"hi-,•;,I„,�0 ,I y �rilill. ' �. �i�n`.. CPA cycle �•I "r r4r :.(�f hp.;17-Renton Land "a7� MN" r,�{ -r"� tri4 I Slap � , Rfillimaiii,ED - Former Aqua Barn Sit& " _ t, ! .r 4 Possible Relevant Comp Plan Text goper .►tfar�` ..- i '_ Ate,, � .,,. ,,.. :t► g �;('''1 ' ' ° • Permit Residential Mobile Home ParkZone ,W.,i•���t �� il�� _ pi ils' *.t (RMH)as an implementing zone in the � �`� Residential Low Density(RLD)land use ,� F y, designation .;� ` i. 1 111). rodiii L �� ,,,i„40.11 ; • Planning Commission hearing scheduled a�, r*� � �,t it • viir7for September 20,2006 u •Applies to Wonderland Estates Mobile Home ';gili*k _. . Park and Condominium Mobile Home Park King County Comprehensive Plan Land Use Map designations with possible Kenton zoning Administration Recommendation , That Council: atik I. Accept the decision of the BRB expanding the boundaries of the Maplewood Addition 4i� annexation from 60.5-acres to approximately 345- - x t ° PP Y 1 a ' t acres, 2. Consider future zoning consistent with the • Comprehensive Plan Land Use Map as amended and amended RLD text at the time of annexation 3. Direct staff to prepare zoning and annexation ��`� ��*,.. ordinances for consideration at the second : + t , required public hearing on zoning � ' 5 Publ/c /leaving 6rrero tcia 8-702606 HALINEN LAW OFFICES, P.S. �cnda riem V a. A Professional Service Corporation f)1a/.k ia'a i 4 eX, David L.Halinen,P.E. McCarver Square Tacoma: (253)627-6680 davidhalinen@halinenlaw.com halinenlaw.com 2115 N. 30th Street, Suite 203 Seattle: (206)443-4684 Tacoma,Washington 98403-3397 Fax: (253)272-9876 August 7, 2006 PUBLIC HEARING CORRESPONDENCE Renton City Council c/o Bonnie Walton, Renton City Clerk 1055 S. Grady Way, Seventh Floor Renton, Washington 98055 RE: The Proposed Maplewood Annexation in relation to my Client Aqua Barn Ranch, Inc.'s 3.02 Acres of Commercially Zoned Property at the Southeast Corner of the Intersection of SR 169 and 152"d Avenue SE(King County Assessor's Parcel Numbers 2323059210 and 2323059211) Dear Council Members: I am writing on behalf of my client Aqua Barn Ranch, Inc. ("ABR"), the owner of two parcels of commercially zoned property fronting SR 169 and located at the southeast corner of the intersection of SR 169 and 152"d Avenue SE in the portion of unincorporated King County that is the subject of Renton's proposed Maplewood Annexation. ABR is currently under contract to sell those two parcels to Cedar Grove Properties, LLC ("Cedar Grove"), a company that is planning to construct a retail development on the parcels. Upon Cedar Grove's recent discovery of the planned Maplewood Annexation, Cedar Grove met with officials of the City's Department of Economic Development, Neighborhoods and Strategic Planning and requested that those two parcels be designated "Corridor Commercial" (CC) on the Renton Comprehensive Plan Land Use Map and zoned "Arterial Commercial"(CA). ABR concurs with that request. Subsequently, the Department has initiated Amendment 2006-M-7, part of which' contemplates a CC Land Use Map designation and concurrent CA zoning for the two subject parcels of land. I understand from my recent discussions with the Department's Don Erickson that the Maplewood Annexation may be deferred long enough to allow the 2006 Comprehensive Plan Amendment process to be completed first so that the two ABR parcels will come into the City with a CC Land Use Map designation and concurrent CA zoning. ABR strongly urges the The other part of Amendment 2006-M-7 contemplates an RMD Land Use Map designation and concurrent R-14 zoning on the site of a recently constructed multi-family residential development south of and abutting ABR's subject two commercially-zoned parcels.) Renton City Council do Bonnie Walton, Renton City Clerk August 7, 2006 Page 2 Council to take that approach, rather than (1) having all of the Maplewood Annexation lands come into the City initially with R-4 zoning and a Land Use Map designation and R-4 zoning and(2) a Comprehensive Plan Land Use Map Amendment to CC (with concurrent CA zoning)to follow thereafter (an approach that I understand was originally being considered). The break in commercial zoning that would result from such a two-step alternative zoning approach (a) could be disruptive to ABR's pending transaction with Cedar Grove and to Cedar Grove's planned retail development and (b) would be unfair and uncalled for in view of the 10-year history of the two parcels' existing commercial zoning and the City's previous recognition of the County's commercial zoning of the two parcels. In view of the above, please defer the annexation until the two ABR parcels will come into the City with a CC Land Use Map designation and concurrent CA zoning. Sincerely, HALINEN LAW OFFICES, P.S. /I David L. Hali -n ;,-.1 14') N >L-I': Std ut4-e L(. cc: Aqua Barn Ranch, Inc. (via email) 1, (,)-Y; . L " Cedar Grove Properties, LLC Attn: Marlin Vortman(via email) Attn: Mark Hashem (via email) Mayor Kathy Keolker-Wheeler Rebecca Lind, Planning Manager, City of Renton Department of Economic Development,Neighborhoods and Strategic Planning (via email) Don Erickson, Senior Planner City of Renton Department of Economic Development, Neighborhoods and Strategic Planning(via email) ��Y O c n, t NrVO - � QUERIN II ANNEXATION PUBLIC HEARING August 7, 2006 The Querin II annexation is located within Renton's Potential Annexation Area and abuts Renton on its western and southern boundary and is bordered by Hoquiam Avenue NE (142m1 Avenue SE) on the west, NE 13th Street on the south, and 144th Avenue SE, if extended, on the east. It is located at the base of an unincorporated peninsula of land between 141st Avenue SE, if extended, on the west and 144th Avenue SE, if extended, on the east. The area is bounded on the north by the south side of NE Sunset Boulevard. The Renton City Council approved a 60% Direct Petition to annex for this annexation on November 7, 2005, and authorized the City Administration to forward the Notice of Intent Package to the Board. The Renton City Council authorized the City Administration to request that the Boundary Review Board invoke its jurisdiction in order to review and hear arguments in favor of expanding the subject annexation to the north and northwest to include a 16.74-acre peninsula of unincorporated King County, surrounded by the City on more than 50 percent of its perimeter. The city was concerned that this peninsula could become an island in the future if it is not annexed now as part of the Querin II Annexation. The Boundary Review Board approved this request to expand the annexation to 24 acres in July 2006. RECOMMENDATION: Council accept the recommendation of the BRB expanding the boundaries of the 7.18- acre Querin II Annexation to 24-acres, and support future R-4 and R-8 zoning consistent with the City's Comprehensive Plan Land Use Map designations shown for the area. If Council accepts this recommendation, staff is requesting that it be directed to prepare the necessary ordinances for annexation effectuation and subsequent City zoning. 411111111111M , - Possible Zoning • ,?,-; • R-4 Zone , (7- — Querin 11 Expanded Annexation 400 800 Possible Zoning • R-8 Zone p_ Querin • • Querin H Expanded Annexation400 800 armearaL d; • t � " Querin Annexation - Expansion 6 . ., ,�' Public Hearing to Consider a BRB Decision to Expand *" � � 4..-''';'Wand Future Zoning August 7,2006 1 Ctty ot Flental xt Merritt II)Phase U) Current Annexations Parkins 52 i ns �sxnu _ `•1 . 1.„ -^aTc AI; ::.irk Boundary Review Board Action r-, terve ■ Council referred annexation to the BRB in i ' -”,-.4c'-.3 i °l'4"a"'" December 2005 L) • City invoked BRB's jurisdiction in January 2006 I , ` n ti.�,; f • BRB held two public hearings on expansion in "ieich.,r*r^n May 2006 7fi2ac tr 5 i Addi'sd 'w • BRB issued its findings and decision in July 2006 5'i ._ ', � Addiuon • AkenFannsS� supporting expansion to 24 acres L Hudson 13.8 ac. c r~� , Heat • `t'` � _Falk II . I'.. Anthoe.�_ •�'� 257 ac Existing Conditions h:;,n, z f y',`i„ ' • _ '° ,,, • PAA–Within Renton's Potential Annexation Area 4^ i _'-"= ,. y• • Location-Between Hoquiam Avenue NE on the west "'' ' )� ' ""_• IF, and 144th Avenue SE,if extended,on the east,south — - `_ of SE 112th Street i`' + F. • Size–24.01-acres(previously was 7.18-acres) o' I • Natural Features–Western portion of site is relatively - AII flat whereas eastern portion is much steeper dropping I•,,, off some 32 feet to Honey Creek 'IoriginatArea.. '"vr,,I • Existing Land Use–17 existing single-family homes 7 r II k and 5 vacant parcelsu sl _ as t, 1 • Boundaries–as shown on next slide Querin II Annexation I ;i 1 Z (jasunS)006 NS p.irnlol.IS anua_nv rt�Ztl 3uole yjAou�uryool,Vtoi\ rim,popurdxa m awoq spArmol lso\(ginos Soiyool,W !,A e. y at�"'�'+ b 9F mai' � 4"y'4 k iiiik k dela seaad atplslwg tlely.lydeaiodo,L 1 , . . o1PP1purpa.Ath�::uZ slsixa�titi,l, t) lauurya �;. u C,uo x uo r 0 salols%OF of did . jlT;dllLl.LLLIL:A oll till \ \_ _ pile laaAJCau y seeiv atgl!sue - suoq puoo 6ui}six r�yd � odol - suo� ipuo� 6ui�six� defy sa.LnlanJJS ' uAalgo.d Lellualod soyllonA uoisuedx;l .7r+. �: e,Av � ■■ aalnos tualaillaul. • ' .' PUCI LmO d Jo uOleiA7O 1' -- S`,'ui vMa dS F 110.0 tiugsix3 LI • l saaar. Ul'i Z jsea No of �� �; _ _ 'x:lutiv?�Aed Ally/ pasodo.ld Jo jledwl se inio 11 f' -,suon!puo�} ugs!x3 sa�u milul apis1np .„ 1 :2-7 ,, s 1:: : ..4 '',-.4•7''''''''.i."1,1` 7Existing Conditions -- 1 & ; : i . Environmental � :, °44t . , ^a� , . Topography—rolling with steep slopes to t east , c*�'' t l' • Environmental Constraints-Honey Creek m;„..,1;,.,,,,P- -- r�',,'- -. and its ravine result in steep slopes and a high erosion area on eastern portion of site County's 2002 Surface Water Design Manual, Level 2 flow-control standards or greater are recommended View looking northvFest along l42,1 Avenue SE near NE Sunset 131vd Existing Conditions — Public Existing Land Use Designation Services & Zoning • Fire fr.._ • ���"•� 6 K.C. Land Use Map- (r'� /�� ■ Within District#25 { Urban Residentia14.12 {■ 4# du/ac ttia rl• � a ■ Utilities Ifs 1102%11V� Within Water District#95 Service Area - K.C.Zoning- ..m {t • Within Renton Sewer Service Area R-4-Residential 4 du/ac' ` r ti�. !l Bonuses up to 6 du/gr.ac. _111 me Ili (i �!llUhl a��.. .iii► �f�'��•air • Schools sr, i tt�!`��tic ti . Within Renton School District `Itk. ran•IN r Site l�imom King County Zoning Map Possible Zoning if Annexed Possible Zoning t . R-4 Lone Renton Comp Plan Land ----r:•---APapca� I :�;'• Use Map , z r. —Residential Low Density (RLD) al _ ', ' —Residential Single Family 'RID ” `; (RS) a: 4 Possible Renton Zoning —R-4 (4 du/net acre) —R-8 (8 du/net acre) .I�es Kt UC-v;r :. SITE Kenton Comprehensive Plan _ !uerin II Ex.an.ed Annexation ",_. 3 Possible Zoning Fiscal Impact Analysis - R-8 Zone • Assumes 17 existing houses w/average assessed value of$220,000 ■ Assumes 64 new homes w/in 10 years • Assumes average assessed value of $450,000 for new single-family homes • Assumes one-time park development cost . of$40,498 luerin II Ex.anded Annexation " Fiscal Impact Conclusion Current Full • The proposed expanded annexation is generally consistent with relevant Development Development Countywide Planning Policies and City Revenues $21,297 $143,722 annexation policies • The BRB found the proposed expansion to Costs $24,512 $121,027 be consistent with relevant Boundary Review Board objectives and policies for Surplus/ ($3,215) $22,695 annexation Deficit • The BRB issued findings and decision One time parks acquisition and development cost of$40,498 supporting expansion Conclusion, continued Administration Recommendation That Council: • No major impediments to the provision of City services to the area were identified 6 Accept the decision of the BRB expanding the during the City's recent review boundaries of the Querin Annexation from 7.18-acres to approximately 24-acres • Proposed R-4 zoning is consistent with Comp Plan Residential Low Density land use Consider future R-4 and R-8 zoning consistent designation with the Comprehensive Plan Land Use Map,at the time of annexation,and • Proposed R-8 zoning is consistent with Comp Plan Single Family Residential land Direct staff to prepare zoning and annexation use designation ordinances for consideration at the second required public hearing on zoning 4 �ti`SY O ADMINISTRATIVE, JUDICIAL, AND �, ® ♦ LEGAL SERVICES DEPARTMENT • MEMORANDUM DATE: August 7, 2006 TO: Randy Corman, Council President Members of the Renton City Council FROM: Kathy Keolker, Mayor Jay Covington, Chief Administrative Officer SUBJECT: Administrative Report In addition to our day-to-day activities, the following items are worthy of note for this week: GENERAL INFORMATION • Do you know someone who is dedicated to making the Renton community the center of opportunity in the Puget Sound Region where businesses and families thrive? This is your chance to recognize that special person for their civic commitment. Nominations for Renton Citizen of the Year are being accepted through August 31st. Some past nominees were making significant contributions through a number of local organizations in which they were involved. Others gave selflessly in support of an individual group, local church, or school. Representatives from the Greater Renton Chamber of Commerce, City of Renton, and Renton Rotary will select the top three outstanding citizens, who will be recognized at a special banquet on October 19th. Out of the finalists, they will choose one to be named Renton's Citizen of the Year. Visit the City's website at www.ci.renton.wa.us for more information, or call the Greater Renton Chamber of Commerce at 425.226.4560. COMMUNITY SERVICES DEPARTMENT • The Lake Washington Bicycle Trail, located along the west side of 1-405 from the northern city limits to Ripley Lane, will be closed for construction from Monday, August 14th, until the evening of Saturday, August 19th. Root damage and heaving necessitates asphalt removal and replacement. Construction work includes grinding existing asphalt, installing a trench with a bio-barrier, root pruning, and laying new asphalt. The Boeing Bicycle Club and Cascade Bicycle Club have been notified, and will post this closure on their websites. In addition, the cities of Bellevue and Newcastle have been notified. In an effort to alert cyclists, on August 3rd, the City will place signage at the northerly city limits and at NE 44th warning users of the trail closure. • The public is invited to attend the third and final open house regarding the re-master planning for Liberty Park, Cedar River Park, and the Narco Property, referred to as the Tri-Park Master Plan. The Plan will be presented for public review and comment at the open house, which will be held at the Renton Community Center, 1715 Maple Valley Highway, on August 16th from 7:00 p.m. to 9:00 p.m. In 1993, the City Council adopted the Cedar River Greenway Master Plan that includes the three park properties. Since adoption, the City has accomplished many of the Plan's goals in developing and acquiring land along the greenway and is now looking to update it in response to future I-405 improvements and changing and evolving recreational needs and demands. For further information, contact Bill Rasmussen, Capital Project Coordinator, at 425.430.6617. Administrative Report August 7,2006 Page 2 ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT, NEIGHBORHOODS & STRATEGIC PLANNING DEPARTMENT • The Winsper Homeowners Association will hold their annual neighborhood picnic on Thursday, August 10th, from 5:30 to 8:30 p.m. in their common area on South 32nd Place. Residents are encouraged to bring their favorite potluck dish and attend their picnic to get to know their neighbors and meet City representatives. • P_Ltileid /9 /Ofr CITY OF RENTON COUNCIL AGENDA BILL AI#: � Submitting Data: For Agenda of: August 7, 2006 Dept/Div/Board.. AJLS/City Clerk Staff Contact Bonnie Walton, x6502 Agenda Status Consent X Subject: Public Hearing.. Correspondence.. Temporary Contract Employee for Public Records Ordinance Processing Assistance Resolution Old Business Exhibits: New Business Study Sessions Issue Paper Information Recommended Action: Approvals: Legal Dept Refer to Finance Committee Finance Dept Other Fiscal Impact: Expenditure Required... $21,000 Transfer/Amendment Amount Budgeted - 0 - Revenue Generated Total Project Budget $21,000 City Share Total Project.. SUMMARY OF ACTION: The City Clerk office requests hiring of a temporary contract employee to provide assistance with public records disclosure requests and related duties for a minimum of four months. The contract employee's term would begin immediately upon approval. Funding would be from unallocated fund balance in the General Fund. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Approve the hiring of a temporary contract employee to provide assistance to the City Clerk for a minimum period of four months, and adopt a budget amendment ordinance in the amount of $21,000. Rentonnedagnbill/ bh r ADMINISTRATIVE, JUDICIAL, AND LEGAL SERVICES DEPARTMENT MEMORANDUM DATE: August 1, 2006 TO: Randy Corman, Council President Members of the Renton City Council VIA: Kathy Keolker, Mayor L FROM: ivy Jay Covington, CAO STAFF CONTACT: Bonnie Walton, City Clerk SUBJECT: Temporary Contract Employee for City Clerk's Office ISSUE: Should approval be given to allow hiring of a temporary contract employee to provide public records assistance to the City Clerk for a period of four months, and a budget amendment ordinance in the amount of$21,000 be adopted? RECOMMENDATION: Approve the hiring of a temporary contract employee to provide public records assistance to the City Clerk for a minimum period of four months, and adopt a budget amendment ordinance in the amount of$21,000. BACKGROUND SUMMARY: From 2002 through 2005, the number of written public records requests filed in the City Clerk office has increased over 400%. Along with public records requests, the City Clerk office also is experiencing a higher than ever number of written public information requests. Over 175 written records and information requests have been received so far in 2006, as compared to approximately 100 in 2005, and approximately 56 in 2004. Many of the requests take a considerable amount of processing time. Additionally, many non- written records and information requests are also handled annually in the City Clerk's office. CONCLUSION: In order to perform the responsibilities of the City Clerk's office, including the heavy demands associated with public records and information requests, hiring of a contract employee to assist during the remainder of 2006 is requested. i:\agenda bills papers\temp contr empl issue paper.doc CITY OF RENTON COUNCIL AGENDA BILL AI#: 7° a/ � ,✓ Submitting Data: For Agenda of: August 7, 2006 Dept/Div/Board.. AJLS/City Clerk Staff Contact Bonnie Walton, x6502 Agenda Status Consent X Subject: Public Hearing.. Correspondence.. Temporary Contract Employee for Public Records Ordinance Processing Assistance Resolution Old Business Exhibits: New Business Study Sessions Issue Paper Information Recommended Action: Approvals: Legal Dept Refer to Finance Committee Finance Dept Other Fiscal Impact: Expenditure Required... $35,000 Transfer/Amendment Amount Budgeted - 0 - Revenue Generated Total Project Budget $35,000 City Share Total Project.. SUMMARY OF ACTION: The City Clerk office requests hiring of a temporary contract employee to provide assistance with public records disclosure requests and related duties for a minimum of four months. The contract employee's term would begin immediately upon approval. Funding would be from unallocated fund balance in the General Fund. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Approve the hiring of a temporary contract employee to provide assistance to the City Clerk for a period of four months, and adopt a budget amendment ordinance in the amount of$35,000. Rentonnet/agnbill/ bh ADMINISTRATIVE, JUDICIAL, AND LEGAL SERVICES DEPARTMENT MEMORANDUM DATE: August 1, 2006 TO: Randy Corman, Council President Members of the Renton City Council VIA: Kathy Keolker, Mayor FROM: Jay Covington, CAO STAFF CONTACT: Bonnie Walton, City Clerk SUBJECT: Temporary Contract Employee for City Clerk's Office ISSUE: Should approval be given to allow hiring of a temporary contract employee to provide public records assistance to the City Clerk for a period of four months, and a budget amendment ordinance in the amount of$35,000 be adopted? RECOMMENDATION: Approve the hiring of a temporary contract employee to provide public records assistance to the City Clerk for a period of four months, and adopt a budget amendment ordinance in the amount of$35,000. BACKGROUND SUMMARY: From 2002 through 2005, the number of written public records requests filed in the City Clerk office has increased over 400%. Along with public records requests, the City Clerk office also is experiencing a higher than ever number of written public information requests. Over 175 written records and information requests have been received so far in 2006, as compared to approximately 100 in 2005, and approximately 56 in 2004. Many of the requests take a considerable amount of processing time. Additionally, many non- written records and information requests are also handled annually in the City Clerk's office. CONCLUSION: In order to perform the responsibilities of the City Clerk's office, including the heavy demands associated with public records and information requests, hiring of a contract employee to assist during the remainder of 2006 is requested. Now is\agenda bills papers\temp contr empl issue paper.doc CITY OF RENTON COUNCIL AGENDA BILL AI#: " e Submitting Data: For Agenda of: Dept/Div/Board.. AJLS/City Clerk August 7, 2006 Staff Contact Bonnie Walton Agenda Status Consent X Subject: Public Hearing.. Bid opening on July 18, 2006, for CAG-06-124, Correspondence.. 2006 Citywide Sidewalk Project Ordinance Resolution Old Business Exhibits: New Business Staff Recommendation Study Sessions Bid Tabulation Sheet(two bids) Information Recommended Action: Approvals: Legal Dept Council concur Finance Dept Other Fiscal Impact: Expenditure Required... $363,823.15 Transfer/Amendment Amount Budgeted Revenue Generated ktaire Total Project Budget $406,893.00 City Share Total Project.. SUMMARY OF ACTION: Engineers Estimate: $370,793.50 In accordance with Council procedure, bids submitted at the subject bid opening met the following three criteria: There was more than one bid, the low bid was within the project budget, and there were no irregularities. • STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Accept the low bid submitted by Dennis R. Craig Construction, Inc. in the amount of kiliaire $363,823.15. C1T' OF RENTON ti`SY O PLANNINGBUILDING/ A7006 (n) PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT• �� ' � � M E M O R A D CITY.11 cKt FRst°FFIc - Nrv0 U M DATE: July 19, 2006 TO: Bonnie Walton, City Clerk FROM: _ Bob Hanson, Transportation Design Supervisor, x7223 /0, STAFF CONTACT: Jason Fritzler, Project Manager, x7243 SUBJECT: 2006 Citywide Sidewalk Project The Transportation Design Section recommends the 2006 Citywide Sidewalk contract be awarded to Dennis R. Craig Construction. There were two bids submitted, the low bid is within budget and there were no irregularities in the low bid. The work for the 2006 Citywide Sidewalk project shall include but is not limited to the construction of sidewalk curb and gutter, curb ramps and drainage installation. The sidewalk construction locations include a section along NE 4th Street, a section along NE 9th Street and Harrington Avenue NE, and select locations within the Maplewood +y�„r community. The funding source for this project will be the Walkway Program(TIP #10), totaling $406,893.00. The lowest bid submitted by Dennis R. Craig Construction fell within the project's total budget at$363,823.15, and under the engineer's estimate of$370,793.50, with a difference of$6,970.35. Attachments: TIP#10 2006 Reallocation Sheet Bid Tab cc: Peter Hahn,Deputy PBPW Administrator—Transportation Jason Fritzler,Transportation Design Project Manager File %rw H:\Division.s\TRANSPOR.TAT\DESIGN.ENGUASON\Projects\2006 Sidewalks\Contract Award Memo.doc • • • CITY OF RENTON PLANNING/BUILDING/PUBLIC WORKS TRANSPORTATION SYSTEMS DIVISION 2006-2011 SIX-YEAR TIP Walkway Program Functional Classification: N/A Fund: 317 Proj.Length: N/A Proj: 9 RANK: 10 CONTACT: Dan Hasty 425.430.7246 DESCRIPTION: STATUS: This program provides for the design and construction of high priority non-motorized The Comprehensive Citywide Walkway Study,completed in May 2003,is being used to transportation facilities for pedestrians. Projects will be identified and prioritized in the upcoming select some of the projects that will move into the design and construction phases. Council Comprehensive Citywide Walkway Study and through coordination with the City's Neighborhood approval of$166,000 in Metro.mitigation funds is split between 2004 and 2005. Program. JUSTIFICATION: CHANGES: Providing safe and convenient non-motorized facilities is an integral part of a complete Funding shown in 2005 will be used to construct the Highlands and Maplewood Glen transportation network. Specific improvements will respond to the needs of school children,the Sidewalk Replacement Project. This construction will be combined with the Benson Road aged and persons with disabilities,and will support increased use of transit. Pedestrian TIB grant project under one construction contract. Funding has been separated for the purposes of the grant. ►Funded : 11,776,832 'Unfunded : 1240,000 Project Totals Programmed Pre-2006 Six-Year Program ITEM Programmed Spent in 2004 2005 Total 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 EXPENSES: Project Development 44,932 8,332 6,600 30,000 5,000 5,000 5,000 5,000 5,000 5,000 Precon Eng/Admin 203,400 53,400 150,000 25,000 25,000 25,000 25,000 25,000 25,000 R-O-W(includes Admin) Construction Contract Fee 1,632,500 8,500 406,000 1,218,000 203,000 203,000' 203,000 203,000 203,000 203,000 Construction Eng/Admin 136,000 34,000 102,000 17,000 17,000 17,000 17,000 17,000 17,000 Other TOTAL EXPENSES, 2,016,832 16,832 500,000, 1,500,000 250,000 250,000' 250,000 250,000 250,000 250,000 SOURCE OF FUNDS: Vehicle Fuel Tax Business License Fee 1,060,000 100,000 960,000 100,000 100,000 250,000 170,000 170,000 170,000 Proposed Fund Balance 180,232 180,232 Grants In-Hand Mitigation In-Hand 370,600 ' . 70,600 300,000 150,000' 150,000 Bonds/L.I.D.'s Formed Other In-Hand(KC Metro Mit) 166,000 16,832 149,168 Grants Proposed Mitigation Proposed L.I.D.'s Proposed - Other Proposed Undetermined 240,000 240,000 80,000 80,000 80,000 TOTAL SOURCES 2,016,832 16,832 500,000 1,500,000 250,000 250,000 250,000 250,000 250,000_ 250,000 - M M mai 06/0712006 6'12 AM 5-10 FINAL ( ( (44 ., F ( ( ( -. "Includes approved budget adjustment Transportation Division Fund 317 7/19/2006 amounts(4/24/2006)and other p Council approved items. 2006 Budget ©=i' 3 ©C5 2006 Approved New 2006 Spending %of Annual Budget Changes* 2006 through Plan Balance Notes LTIP#1 Program J P.M. 1 Proj.# Appropriation 6/30/2006 Spent DESIGN 1 Street Overlay Program Bill 12108 655,000 101,000 756,000 23,309 732,691 3 _27th/Strander Design _Rob 12239 2,202,400 (1,902,400) 300,000 15,975 284,025 27th/Strander, Ph. 1, Seg. 1 Rob 12240 - 2,485,000 2,485,000 1,173,795 1,311,205 To be reimbursed through bonds. 7 Rainier Av-S 4th PI to S 2nd St Jason 12501 597,000 597,000 713 596,287 8 Hardie Av SW Transit/Multimodal Jason 12502 1,077,000 1,077,000 18,692 1,058,308 10 Walkway Program _RP/JF/DH 9 250,000 321,000 571,000 164,107 406,893 11 _Rainier Av-S 7th St to S 4th PI _Jason 12308 871,000 871,000 183,104 687,896 12 S Lake Washington Rdwy Improv. Rob 12306 - 10,875,000 10,875,000 473,275 10,401,725 Pending bond issuance. 13 South Renton Project James 12194 395,000 395,000 58,463 336,537 18 Bridge Program Jason 106_ 220,000 220,000 38,244 181,756 19 May Creek Bridge Replacement Jason 12503 - 120,000 120,000 437 119,563 27 Arterial Rehabilitation Program James 12186 240,000 240,000 - 240,000 28 Duvall Av NE James 12123 2,474,800 2,474,800 393,647 2,081,153 32 Missing Links Ryan P. 12106 30,000 30,000 1,190 28,810 36 Lake Wash. By: Park-Coulon James 12121 _ - - 1,055 I (1,055) 38 Environmental Monitoring Jason 12187_ 75,000 75,000 8,177 66,823 45 SR 169 HOV-140th to SR900 Rob 12175 3,565,400 906,800 4,472,200 284,100 4,188,100 46 Benson Rd Ped-S 26th to Main Jason 12309 2,500 157,500 ' 160,000 137,810 22,190 47 Sunset/Duvall Intersection James 12301 33,300 1,528,400 ' 1,561,700 815,072 746,628 $1,528,369 approved by Council 2/6/06. 48 Logan Av N Concrete Panel Repair James 12303 - - - - 50 Houser Wy S-Main Av S to Burnett James 12213 - - - - 51 Lake Wash. By. Slip Plane Jason 12302 2,400 (2,400) - - - 52 Monster Rd Bridge Jason 12307 27,000 (27,000) - - - 53 Duvall Av NE-King County James 12305 3,169,200 3,169,200 53,436 3,115,764 Design Total $ 15,887,000 $ 14,562,900 30,449,900 $ 3,844,600 26,605,300 Spending Plan Target' $ 12,709,600 30.2% OPERATIONS 16 NE 4th St/Hoquiam Av NE Bob 12209 359,000 359,000 4,025 354,975 20 Loop Replacement Program Dave 16 15,000 15,000 _ - 15,000 21 Sign Replacement Program Dave 12113 5,000 5,000 - 5,000 22 Light Pole Replacement Program Dave 91 20,000 20,000 - 20,000 24 _Traffic Safety Program Karl 12115 70,000 82,000 152,000 _ 10,663 141,338 $50k Heather Downs/$45k 3rd/Shattuck 25 Traffic Efficiency Program Karl 12162 101,500 (15,000) 86,500 26,938 59,562 -$15k for 3rd/Shattuck 29 RR Crossing Safety Program Karl 12166 5,000 5,000 101 4,899 37 School Zone Sign Upgrades Karl 12504 100,000 100,000 - 100,000 Out Transit Priority Bob 12174 - - - - Operations Total $ 675,500 $ 67,000 742,500 $ 41,726 700,774 Spending Plan Target' $ 540,400 7.7% I\sgriffin\budget\2006\Budget-Expenditures thru June 30th 1 i 2006 Citywide Sidewalk Project July 19,2006 Project Title 2006 Citywide Sidewalk Project City of Renton us f:=•-: '' Schedule A(Maplewood) Dennis R Craig ,k,Kfi lftttrttctiOR CO Engineers Estimate .8" Per=�9. Bid Date July 18,2006 '% �'.'. Item Unit Est Unit Bid Unit Bid :°;.;:•. No Description i - �' v Quantity Price Amount Price Amount 'MV4Pf1btl Attlotint°'l 1 Mobdtzah°n LS 1 27,184.50 27,184.50 23,887.00 23,887.00i'°ir;M,000u0',i ',,k,000,00., 2 Contractor Supplied Surveying LS 1 3,000.00 3,000.00 4,715.00 4,715.00 Sr $,000.00` 4:4;4 0,000.00 Traffic Control LS 1 3,000.00 3,000.00 24,762.00 24,762.00.1104,000;00.s`<'..14,000.00' 4 Roadside Cleanup FA 1 2,000.00 2,000.00 2,000.00 2,000.00.V:„.,,,, 00.00: 5 Remove Curb and Gutter ,.l X08 "''?':14,820.00 LF 2,280 15.00 34,200.00 7.70 17,558.007;°>.8� ',6.50�.' ``14,$20.00 6 Remove Cement Concrete Sidewalk and Driveway SY 1,062 15.00 15,930.00 24.15 25,647.30•.•,,..,8,t'"?` 7 Remove Asphalt Concrete Pavement18.00 `_-14, 68.00' SY 506 15.00 7,590.00 15.10 7,640.60`k.';::`2$.QQ.:,,:'-14,168.00 8 Crushed Surfacing Top Course TON 873 35.00 30,555.00 30.20 26,364.60 'tt.,o:' 34,920,00 9 HMA Cl V T PG 64-22 5Q,O0'°":rs%` TON 120 120.00 14,400.00 185.00 22,200.OOg,- ,':;�{�QO'=Ir•i s 19,200.00'- 10 Adjust Existing Catch Basin Inlet EA 6 50.00 300.00 425.00 2,550,00::;'?o;�45040 r;};[,,2,'700.00 11 Adjust Existing Valve Box EA 24 50.00 1,200.00 12 Inlet Protection 350.00 8,400.00 :�t'tj5tJ,00;;�:'.^;:tr44,000,OD. EA 8 100.00 800.00 50,00 400,00. � 130.00 :, ss`-`64000, 13 Seeding and Fertilizing by Hand SY 200 2.00 400.00 5.00 1,000.00 '' , h S 14 Topsoil Type A CY 168 P ,00.x."• '0 • 40.00 6,720.00 35.75 6,IX16.00';", 210�.�<,e,11t0,080.Op; 15 Sod Installation SY 1,520 20.00 30,400.00 12.15 18,468.00 „,::',..z2k `"' 16 Cement Conc Approach 3 Day SY `1".44100 A M=a'i"'.21,2130.00-" 335 60.00 20,100.00 52.10 17,453.501; ° 0.00:-<,,,,31-30,150.00 17 Cement Conc Sidewalk SY 1,130 45.00 50,850.00 32.30 36,499.00 ,00'= 4150.00- 18 Curb Ramp EA 4 �, 1,200.00 4,800.00 1,085.35 8,272.00 ?'i'1;824.00''s e54,720-0 19 Cement Concrete Barrier Curb and Gutter LF 2,280 20.00 45,600.00 12.40 28,272.00?'•`:Fla:•.." `24.00:_';.°=54,720.OD TOTAL: 299,029.50 278,162.40 `„- .;.,...,349;234.00; Project Title: 2006 Citywide Sidewalk Project City of Renton ?1•F >a .W;a , t.,,,;: Schedule: 8(9th and Hartington) Engineers Estimate Dennis R Craig d •x • inn Gory Bid Date: July 18,2006 # �� i Item Unit Est Unit Bid Unit gid �"l No. Descnption Quantity Price Amount Price Amount 10,;. �wM >.- 1 Mobilization LS 1 3,418.50 3,418.50 3,180.00 3,180.00" 'ki: 2 Contractor Supplied Surveying LS 1 1 . ,04400': ,000.00 3 TraffictrControl 1,000.00 1,000.00 1,250.00 1,250.00`;',',•4,700,00.14•t' 1,700300 _ LS 1 3,200.00 3,200.00 8,650.00 8,650.00.v'ti14,00100. ..14000.00 4 Roadside Cleanup FA 1 1,000.00 1,000.00 1,000.00 1,000,00',;,'.SYOOQ.00., 1,00000 5 Remove Cement Concrete Sidewalk and Driveway SY 205 15.00 3,075.00 24.15 4,950.75),'..*::; :..00 6 Remove As.halt Concrete Pavement 13.90n.';..'':. SY 100 15.00 1,500.00 17.50 4,750.00�i14'7�i i ,<�� ,, ,,; 7 Crushed Surfacin.Top Course TON 100 35.00 3,500.00 35.00 3, 18.00 ;,, i i 8 H A-Cl 1/2"PG 64-22 TON fvf.2-:, waw4,�7 -r i' y` 20 120.00 2,400.00 215.00 4 i i.W as e e i..°.i= 170;00 9 Ad ust Existin.Catch Basin Inlet EA 1 50.00 50.00 425.00 425.00 4 i t., 10 Ad"int Existin.Valve Box EA 1a xkr� u, 7004? 50.00 50.00 350,00 350.00-,','• 8 4.;AP 11 Inlet Protection EA 2 100.00 200.00 50.00 100,00 r i g• .' 12 Seedin•and Fertilizin.by Hand SY 200 "-'' 1' ; .80.'40 2.00 400.00 5.00 1,000.00: <'<i,i,.?0%.a.%s 600_iTi" 13 To isod T pe A CY 4 40.00 160.00 95,00 38040, r ,i R3 14 Sod Installation SY 14 `a' sa' f0t10(j;.: 20.00 280,00 25.00 350,00 t r i 2.10.7.1 , 8.8 15 Cement Conc. •.proach 3 Da SY 17 60.00 1,020.00 85.50 1,4' .50",.'-'','.2,1•210.1n4,;',..,- 16 Cement Conc.Sidewalk1a F 17 Curb Ram. SY 150 45.00 6 750.00 1..50 i,, .. t 8:�� 814.8a EA 3 1,200.00 3,600.00 1,085.35 3,256.05 : ori r r 00 a 18 Cement Concrete Barrier Curb and Gutter LF 300 20.00 6,000.00 18.95 5,685.00,r<'..„, t''n'; �� 5: 0,5(14,00'° TOTAL: 37,603.50 44,055.30 ;>' Project Title: 2006 Citywide Sidewalk Project City of Renton Schedule: C(4th and Bronson) Engineers Estimate gonitis R Ctaigt' Bid Date: July 18,2006 �1� Item Unit Est. Unit Bid Unit Bid ,':-.8;:l‘:1' No. Descri•lion Chianti Price Amount Price 1 Mobilization - - Afh9U5, ` ' LS 1 3,105.50 3,105.50 ='''.00 9'i,'s±,..3.57.1".X1,1:,!',44..., ,,,,,,+;, 1f;. 2 Contractor Supplied Surveying LS 1 1,000.00a. 3 Traffic Control 1,000.00 1' 50.00 ,250,OOF ,i1i;e,, ,;' ,�. 8.�•e.0¢: LS 1 3200.00 3,200.00 8220.00 8220-00' 1t 1i 1:,, 4 Roadside Cleans. FA 1 .nn..t��`'6 -�' 5 Remove Cement Concrete Sidewalk and Drrvewa 1 000.0011 000.00 1024. 5 155045 ;'8 i*1e r t 1)9900; SY 15.00 345.00 24.15 555.45 #" Tri vt 29960`; 6 Remove As.halt Concrete Pavement SY 170 15.00 2,550.00 7. i 2 975.00 g,,,,•F.14,1:Yr' w ., •i.' 7 Crushed Surfacin.Top Course TON 100 x.81« ,a r • 8 H.M.A.Cl 1m PG 64-22 55.00 3,500.00 38,00 3 800.00 r t t 8..ii>• TON 20 120.00 2,400,00 215.00 4,300.00 " :r t i i R , 000 8:8, 9 Corru.ated Pol eth lene Storm Sewer Pi.e 12-in Diam LF 10 30.00 300.00 65.00 650,00S 10 Catch Basin T pe I + r'ei '.k'.. , 2 450.00 900.00 1,150.00 2,341.00 11 Solid Lockin.Cover EA 2 ', •i i.f:'�.; ?.: , �e� 2.600. 8 12 Adjust Existing Catch Basin Inlet 525.00 1,050.00 395.00 790.00',:�x�,�`+ i_8;_ jty.:-;;.�+'i,40' 13 Adjust Existing Valve Box EA 1 50.00 50.00 EA 1 50.00 425.00 425.00.'4,s 1+t ;.y::> '170.00 14 Adjust Existing Water Valve 50.00 350.00 350.00 `.i:,",--12,50.00,-.i.' • `; .',254.60 A 1 100.00 100.00 450.00 450.00•;',,. .-:.:',450,60'i,', 15 Connect to Existing Catch Basin EA 2 . t( i•'ZS0.00 16 Inlet Protection 500.00 1,000.00 430.00 860.00- ":.8 0� ,;,.84000 EA 3 100.00 300.00 50.00 150.00=? ;s,8`.•>, 17 Seeding and Fertilizing by Hand SY 200 l' 00'_ i"`.'"�''' s 18 Topsoil Type A 2.00 400.00 5.00 1,000.00�" ^.;�><� ���'a�f>bQ:fjO; CY 4 40.00 160.00 95.00 380.00:' e ,,"" 19 Cement Conc Sidewalk --- Sr 150 ""�3 " "'�"'" '00� 45.00 6,750.00 16.50 2,475.00. �,83r 20 Cement Concrete Barrier Curb and Gutter LF 300 '(j0}�j.^` "c l 404.1,1' 20.00 6,000.00 18.95 5,685.00'��g?��Oi}ID"'i;:"'?��'000.1>El`. TOTAL: 34,160.50 41,605.45 /•181,558,00`. it'S59:00'. PROJECT TOTAL: 370,793.50 363,823.15 495,058.00 Low Bid CITY OF RENTON BID TABULATION SHEET ,PROJECT: 2006 Citywide Sidewalk Project; CAG-06-124 DATE: July 18,2006 FORMS BID BIDDER Bid Triple Bond Form Dennis R. Craig Construction,Inc. X X $363,823.15 PO Box 595 Redmond, WA 98073-0595 Janie Craig Kemper Construction Corporation X X $495,058.00 PO Box 332 Redmond, WA 98073 William P. Kemper NGINEER'S ESTIMATE TOTAL: $370,793.50 LEGEND: Forms:Triple Form:Non-Collusion Affidavit,Anti-Trust Claims,Minimum Wage CITY OF RENTON COUNCIL AGENDA BILL AI N: 74. °I Submitting Data: For Agenda of: Dept/Div/Board.. AJLS/City Clerk August 7, 2006 Staff Contact Bonnie Walton Agenda Status Consent X Subject: Public Hearing.. Bid opening on July 14, 2006, for CAG-06-092, Correspondence.. 2006 Street Overlay with Curb Ramps Project Ordinance Resolution Old Business Exhibits: New Business Staff Recommendation Study Sessions Bid Tabulation Sheet (three bids) Information Recommended Action: Approvals: Legal Dept Council concur Finance Dept Other Fiscal Impact: Expenditure Required... $1,048,553.89 Transfer/Amendment „✓ Amount Budgeted Revenue Generated Total Project Budget $1,131,412.00 City Share Total Project.. SUMMARY OF ACTION: Engineers Estimate: $1,100,734.14 In accordance with Council procedure, bids submitted at the subject bid opening met the following three criteria: There was more than one bid, the low bid was within the project budget, and there were no irregularities. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Accept the low bid submitted by Western Asphalt, Inc. in the amount of$1,048,553.89. CCTV OF RENTON CITY OF RENTON ,AUG 0 1 2006 PLANNINGBUILDING/PUBLIC WORKS CITY CLERK S OFFICE �.r MEMORANDUM DATE: August 1, 2006 TO: Bonnie Walton, City Clerk CC: Bob Hanson James Wilhoit FROM: Bill Wressell, x7400 SUBJECT: 2006 Street Overlay with Curb Ramps CAG-06-092 The Transportation Division recommends that the bid from Western Asphalt, Inc. be accepted and the contract for the 2006 Street Overlay with Curb Ramps Project be awarded in the amount of$1,048,553.89. The total budget for the project is $1,131,412 and it is funded by The Street Overlay Program, The Arterial Rehabilitation Program, Community Services for the Ripley Lane Trail, Water Capital Improvement Program lkirre (CIP) for the Talbot Hill Water Main Replacement Project Phase II, and The Water/Wastewater/Surface Water CIP for the Central Business District Utility Replacement Project. The Engineer's estimate for the construction of the 2006 Street Overlay with Curb Ramps, under this contract, is $1,100,734.14. If you have any additional questions or concerns please give me a call. `err clerk1 , BID TABULATIOIN 2006 STREET OVERLAY WITH CURB RAMPS ` City of Renton Contractor Contractor- Contractor BID DATE July 14,2006 Engineers Estimate Western Asphalt,Inc WOODWORTH&COMPANY,INC Lakeside Industries Item Desttipbon Una ESL Una Bid Unit BM Una Bid Unit Bk/ No Ouanbty Price Amount Price Amount Price Amount Price Amount Schedule'A" *1111110 001 Mobilization Lump Sum 100 $20,00000 $20,000 00 $15,680 00 $15,680 00 $22,000 00 $22,000 00 120,000 00 520,000 00 002 Traffic Control Lump Sum 1 00 $10,000 00 $10.000 00 58,960 00 58,960 00 $50,000 00 $50,000 00 520.000 00 020.000 00 003 Rehabilitate Ripley Lane Trail Lump Sum i 00 $40000 00 $40.000 00 530240 00 $30 240 00 520 000 00 $20 00000 $30 000 00 030.000 00 004 Asphalt Concrete Paving(Overlay) Ton 1,183 00 $60 00 $70,980 00 571 68 $84.797 44 $67 00 079.261 00 $57 40 $67,904 20 HMA Class 12'PG 64-22 005 Renpval of Asphalt Concrete Square Yard 6,724 00 $700 047,068 00 $3 08 $20709.92 $465 $31.26660 $3 85 $25.887 40 Pavemera(by Cold Planing) 006. Adjust Manhole Each 1600 0400 00 $6,400.00 $29680 54,748 80 $400 00 56.400 00 $400 00 $6.400 00 007 Adjust VaNe Box Each 3700 $30000 $11,10000 $20160 07,45920 $30000 $11,10000 $30000 011,10000 008 Adjust Catch Basin Each 200 $40000 $800.00 $296 80 $59360 540000 5800 00 $400 00 $800 00 009 Plastic Cmsswatc Linear Foot 77000 $1 50 $1,15500 5448 $3,44960 $1 80 51,38600 $180 51,38600 (8•Wide) 010 Plastic Stop Bar(18'Wrde) Linear Fool 78 00 54 00 $31200 $1120 $87360 $500 $390 00 $5 00 $390 00 011 4'R6sed Pavement Marker Each 180 00 $2 00 0360 00 02 24 $403 20 SI 65 $29700 $1 65 $297 00 Type/,Whae 012 4'Raised Pavement Marker Each 24 00 5300 $72 00 $3 36 580 64 $3 75 $9000 $3 75 $000 Type 2e,White 013 4"Raised Pavement Marker Each 1400 51000 514000 $336 $4704 $1000 $14000 $1000 $14000 Type 2,Slue 014. Install Truncated Domes On Square Foot 72 00 $30.00 $2,160 00 $67 20 54,83840 $52 00 53,744 00 852 00 53,744 00 Exiling Curb Ranps 015 Finish and Clean Up Lump Sum 100 51.500 00 $1,500 00 $2.240 00 $2240 00 53,000 00 $3,000 00 03,500 00 03,500 00 Total Schedule"A" 5212,047.00 5185,12144 0229,87460 5191,63860 Schedule"B" 001 Mobtirabon Lump Sum 100 $70,000.00 $70,00.0 564,96000 $64.96000 $63,000.00 063.00000 5110,00000 0110,00000 002 Traffic Control Lump Sum 100 $80,00000 580,0000D 572,80000 $72,80000 $76,000 00 578,00000 $140,00000 5140.00000 003 Asphalt Concrete Paving(Overlay) Ton 7.626 00 060 00 $457 560 00 $64 96 $495 384 96 $67 00 $510,942 00 $57 40 $437,732 40 HMA Class 1/2'PG 64-22 004 Removal 01 Asphalt Concrete Square Yard 12,616 00 $7 00 988,312 00 $3 08 538.857 28 $4 65 $58.664 40 54 35 554,87960 Pavement(by Cold Planing) 005 Adjust Monument Each 3000 $30000 $9,00000 $20160 56,04800 $300.00 $9,00000 $30000 59,00000 006 Adjust Manhole Each 11000 $400.00 544,00000 529680 532,64800 $40.00 $44,00000 $40000 044.00000 007 Adjust VaNe Box Each 710 $300 $21,300 520160 514,31360 $3000 521.3000 $300 $21,3000 008 Adjust Catch Basin Each 3 0 $400 0 $120 0 5296 80 $890 40 $40 0 61,20 00 $40 00 $1 20 30 009. Adjust Meter Box Each 1 00 $300 DO $300 0 $296 80 $296 80 $300 0 $300 0 $40 0 $40000 010 4'Rased Pavement Marker Each 2.252.0 52 00 $4,504 0 $1 68 $3.783 36 $1.65 $3.715.80 $165 $3.715 80 Type 1,Yellow 011 4'Raised Pavement Marker Each 216 0 $3 0 $648 0 $1 68 $362.88 $175 $810 0 $3 75 $810 00 Type 2d,Yellow 012 4'Raised Pavement Marker Each 903 0 5200 51.80600 53 36 53,034 08 01 65 01.489 95 01 65 51,489 95 Type 1,White 013. 4'Raised Pavement Marker Each 133 0 $3 0 $399.00 $3 36 $446 88 $3 75 5498 75 $3 75 $498 75 Type 2e,White BID TABULATIOIN 2006 STREET OVERLAY WITH CURB RAMPS 014. 4"Raised Pavement Marker Each 41 00 $1000 $410.00 $1120 $459 20 $1000 541000 $1000 $41000 Type 2.Blue 015 Plastic Crosswalk Linear Foot 640.00 $150 $96000 $179 $1.14560 $180 $1,15200 $180 $1.15200 (B"W de) 016 Plastic Stop 8ar(18"Woe) Linear Foot 23200 $400 $92800 5392 890944 $500 $1.16000 5500 $1,16000 017 Plastic Arrow Each 24 00 $40 00 $960 00 54704 51.128 96 555 00 $1,320 00 555 00 01 320 00 018 Plastic Parking Stall Markings Linear Foot 1.000 00 51 00 $1.000 00 55 60 $5 600 00 53 00 53.000 00 $3 00 53 000 00 (4'Wide) 019 Induction Loops Each 22.00 $60000 $1320000 $42000 $9,24000 $52500 $11,55000 $52200 511,48400 020 4"White Edge of Road Line Linear Foot 250.00 $0 20 $50 00 $0 56 $14000 $2 00 $500 00 $2 00 $500 00 021 Curb Ramp,Cement Concrete,Type Each 21 00 52.000 00 $42,000.00 $2,520 00 $52.920 00 $2,853 00 $59,91300 $3,250 00 $68,250 00 022 Curb Ramp,Cement Concrete.Type Each 600 52.500 00 515,000 00 $2,665 60 515,993 60 $3,566 00 $21.396 00 53,500 00 $21,000 00 023 Install Truncated Domes On Square Fool 152 00 53000 $4,560 00 $61 60 59,363 20 $52 00 $7,904 00 $52 W 57,904 W Ensng Curb Ramps 024 Sawnit Concrete 4.6 Linear Foot 700 $1000 $70 00 $5 60 $39 20 $20 00 $140 00 $5 00 $35 00 025 Sawcl Asphah 4-8' Unear Foot 4900 51000 $49000 5560 527440 $1000 $49000 $500 $24500 026 Crushed Surfacing Top Course Ton 30 00 $35 00 $1 050 00 $39 20 $1 176 00 $40 00 $1.200 00 $1000 $300 00 027 Remove Concrete Curb and Gutter linear Foot 55.00 $1000 $550 00 $5 60 $308 00 $2350 51,292 50 530 00 51.650 00 028 Remove Concrete Sidewalk or Curb Square Yard 26.00 $1000 5260 00 $1344 5349 44 $48 75 $1267 50 560 00 $1,560 00 029 Remove Asphalt at Curb and Gutter Square Yard 12.00 $1000 $120_00 $22.40 $26880 $48 75 $585.00 $20 00 $240.00 030 Concrete Cum and Gutter Linear Foot 55.00 $20 00 51.10000 539 20 52.156 00 $63 65 53.500 75 $30 00 51.650 00 031 Cemem Concrete Sidewalk Square Yard 26 00 $45 00 51,170 00 060 48 31.572 48 $134 65 83.500 90 $65 00 81.690 00 032 Asphalt Concrete Paton at Curb 6Gt Ton 27 00 580 00 $2 160 00 $122 40 53.304 80 $95 00 52,565 00 $100 00 52,700 00 HMA Class 12"PG 64-22 033 Seeding and Fertilizing Square Yard 30 00 $2 00 560 00 $22 40 $672 00 $1000 $30000 $25 00 $750 00 034 Topsoil,Type A Cubic Yard 10.00 $40 00 $400 00 $69 44 $694 40 $50 00 $500 00 $5000 $500 00 035 Temporary Water Pollution/Erosion I Lump Sum I 00 $500 00 $500 00 51,120 00 $1.120 00 $2,000 00 $2,000 00 $3.000 0D 53.000 00 036 Finish and Clean Up Lump Sum 1.00 $4.00000 54.000 00 $4.480 00 54,480 00 53.000 00 53.000 00 520000 00 520,000 00 Subtotal Schedule"A" 5212,04700 $185,121 44 $229,874 60 5191.638 60 8.8 Sales Tax on Sch"A"only $10,660 14 516.29069 $20,22896 $16,864 20 Total Schedule"A" 5230,70714 5201,412 13 $250,103 56 5208.502 80 Total Schedule"B" 5870,02700 $847,141 76 5919567 55 5975,526.50 Total Schedules"A"and"B" 01,10073414 51,048,55389 $1,169,671 11 $1,184,029.30 11100" CITY OF RENTON BID TABULATION SHEET PROJECT: 2006 Street Overlay with Curb Ramps; CAG-06-092 DATE: July 14,2006 FORMS BID BIDDER Bid Triple Addendum Bond Form Western Asphalt, Inc. X X X PO Box 980 $1,048,553.89 Maple Valley, WA 98038 William P. Petersen Lakeside Industries X X X $1,184,029.30 18808 SE 257th St. Covington, WA 98042 Craig Nickel Woodworth&Company, Inc. X X X $1,169,671.11 1200 East D St. Tacoma, WA 98421 Jeffrey A. Woodworth ENGINEER'S ESTIMATE TOTAL: $1,100,734.14 LEGEND: Forms:Triple Form.Non-Collusion Affidavit,Anti-Trust Claims,Minimum Wage CITY OF RENTON COUNCIL AGENDA BILL i , I AI#: , Submitting Data: For Agenda of: Dept/Div/Board.. AJLS/City Clerk August 7, 2006 Staff Contact Bonnie Walton Agenda Status Consent X Subject: Public Hearing.. CRT-06-002; Court Case Correspondence.. Langley 4th Avenue Associates, LLC v. City of Renton; Ordinance Ridgeview Court, LLC; and Cliff Williams, Applicant Resolution Old Business Exhibits: New Business Summons and Land Use Petition Study Sessions Information Recommended Action: Approvals: Refer to City Attorney and Insurance Services Legal Dept Finance Dept Other Fiscal Impact: Expenditure Required... Transfer/Amendment kiate Amount Budgeted Revenue Generated Total Project Budget City Share Total Project.. SUMMARY OF ACTION: Summons and Land Use Petition filed in King County Superior Court on behalf of Langley 4th Avenue Associates, LLC, by Ater Wynne LLP, Lawyers, 601 Union St., Suite 5450, Seattle, 98101, requesting denial of the Ridgeview Court Final Plat (FP-06-012)until the surface water drainage issues are corrected. RECEIVED 1 In King County Superior Court Clerks Offi€e 1+4100• 2 JUL 1 7 ZOOS 3 Cashier Section 4 Superior Court Clerk 5 orrY OF FENTON 6 JUL172IJ% 7 RECEIVED CITY CLERK'S OFFICE 8 SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON ' /41ipm FOR THE COUNTY OF KING ' cag 1.ed Svc 9 LANGLEY 4TH AVENUE ASSOCIATES, No. 06 - 2 - 23030 - 2lKNT 10 LLC, 11 Petitioners, LAND USE PETITION 12 v. 13 CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON; RIDGEVIEW COURT, LLC; AND CLIFF 14 WILLIAMS, APPLICANT, Nowir 15 Res,ondents. 16 I. INTRODUCTION 17 Langley 4th Avenue Associates, LLC ("Petitioners") appeal the decision by the City 18 19 Council of Renton, Washington to grant final plat approval to the Plat of Ridgeview Court. 20 II. THE PARTIES 21 A. Petitioners 22 Langley 4th Avenue Associates, LLC . ✓� Suite 106 23 6450 Southcenter Boulevard :V; - may, ,. Tukwila, WA 98188 , 24 'x? Ridgeview Court, LLC -11-7(14 'f I ; 25 P.O Box 2401 t tf Kirkland, WA 98083 *Illo'` LAND USE PETITION - PAGE 1 ATER WYNNE LLP 318514_1 DOC LAWYERS 601 UNION SI BEET,SUITE 5450 SEATTLE,WA 98101-2327 (206)623 4711 1 Cliff Williams, PE P.O Box 2401 2 Kirkland, WA 98083 3 Counsel for Petitioner: 4 Joel R. Paisner 5 Paul E. Brain Ater Wynne LLP 6 601 Union Street, Suite 5450 Seattle, Washington 98101-2327 7 B. Local Jurisdiction and Decision. 8 1. City of Renton, Washington, Renton, Washington. 9 10 2. By minute entry and resolution dated June 26, 2006, the Renton City 11 Council approved the Ridgeview Court Final Plat constituting 2.4 Acres located in the vicinity 12 of 327 Bremerton Ave Northeast. The Minutes of the Renton City Council containing the entry 13 and resolution are attached and incorporated herein by reference as Exhibit A. 14 C. Other Parties. , irrie 15 1. Ridgeview Court, LLC 16 Ridgeview Court, LLC is the owner listed of record and is proposing that the 2.4 acres it 17 owns be subdivided into 20 single-family lots. 18 2. Cliff Williams, PE 19 Cliff Williams, PE is the Applicant and is proposing that the 2.4 acres be subdivided into 20 21 20 single-family lots. 22 III. STANDING 23 Petitioner has standing to appeal the grant of final plat approval because it owns property 24 adjacent to the Applicant. Petitioner's property is subject to the drainage impacts and the failure 25 of the City of Renton to fully review the application of Applicant that demonstrates that the LAND USE PETITION - PAGE 2 ATER WYNNE LLP 318514_1 DOC LAWYERS 601 UNION STREET,SUITE 5450 SEATTLE,WA 98101-2327 (206)623-4711 project approved by the City of Renton will result in an inundation of Petitioner's property. l vow, 2 Approval of the final plat by the City of Renton directly impacts Petitioner and Petitioner's 3 property. 4 IV. STATEMENT OF ERRORS AND STATEMENT OF FACTS 5 A. The City of Renton Erroneously Granted Final Plat Approval for the 6 Subdivision of Ridgeview Crest Despite Obvious Errors. 7 The Applicant failed to accurately disclose to the City of Renton how the subdivision 8 site itself differed from what was in the engineering drawings. By failing to accurately disclose 9 the existence of approximately 12 feet of fill on the property, the City of Renton has approved a 10 subdivision that fails to drain surface water in a manner consistent with city codes and state law. 11 The engineering reports and plans contained an error, and the identified channel for 12 13 drainage on the site in fact did not exist at the time of application for subdivision approval, and 14 does not exist currently on the ground. As a result, the City of Renton has approved a Alisw 15 subdivision that allows surface water to pool on the property and drain to the pond that 16 Petitioner has had to construct, but Petitioner is not required to account for such drainage from 17 the Ridgeview Crest subdivision. The Applicant has failed to comply with City of Renton 18 codes regarding drainage, and inaccurately portrayed both the topography and the natural 19 20 drainage of the property. The City of Renton failed to ensure that proper drainage controls were 21 implemented in the final plat, failed to properly investigate the natural drainage flow in the area, 22 and such failure is contrary to the public interest. 23 24 25 LAND USE PETITION - PAGE 3 ATER WYNNE LLP 318514_1.DOC LAWYERS 601 UNION STREET,SUITE 5450 SEATTLE,WA 98101-2327 (206)623-4711 B. The Renton City Council Failed to Require a Reexamination of the Drainage 1 Flows in the Area of the Applicant's Property to Determine Compliance with 2 the Preliminary Plat Application. "otiS 3 Petitioner notified the City of Renton regarding the errors that the preliminary plat 4 approval was based upon when it was discovered by Petitioner. Despite providing detailed 5 evidence to the Development Director, the City of Renton approved the Final Plat application 6 by the Applicant. See Attached Exhibit B. The errors in the application are a result of filling 7 that has occurred on the property owned by Applicant, and the unlawful change in the way that 8 water reaches Petitioner's property and the amount of such water. As a result, the City of 9 10 Renton has allowed Petitioner's property to store and retain water that the Applicant is obligated 11 to address. By approving the final plat for Ridgeview Crest, the City of Renton has approved an 12 unlawful diversion of surface water contrary to the city codes and state law. 13 C. The Decision of the City Council of Renton to Approve the Final Plat of 14 Ridgeview Crest Results in an Unlawful Taking of Petitioner's Property 15 The Decision of the City of Renton to approve the final plat of Ridgeview Crest results in 16 a denial of substantive due process and a taking of Petitioner's property. Despite the fact that 17 Petitioner has notified the City of Renton and the Applicant that its property will be inundated 18 by the development of Ridgeview Crest and have more drainage runoff on it than previously, 19 the City approved the final plat. This approval will result in a portion of Petitioner's property 20 being taken to store and retain runoff that it has not had to do in the past. 21 22 V. RELIEF REQUESTED 23 Petitioners respectfully request that this court issue an order to the City of Renton to deny 24 the final plat approval of the subdivision of Ridgeview Crest until the surface water drainage 25 LAND USE PETITION - PAGE 4 ATER WYNNE LLP 318514 I DO( LAWYERS 601 UNION STREET,SUITE 5450 SEATTLE,WA 98101-2327 (206)623-4711 • issues are corrected. In addition, Petitioner may seek preliminary relief to prevent recording of 1 1%10►• 2 the final plat until these issues are addressed to prevent a taking of Petitioner's property. 3 DATED this 17th day of July, 2006. 4 AT . YNNEr// / LLP 5 y= A44 6 Jo-, Paisner, WS.A#16405 Paul Brain, WSBA #13438 7 Attorneys for Petitioners 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 14009 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 ''4110+ LAND USE PETITION - PAGE 5 ATER WYNNE LLP 318514_1.DOC LAWYERS 601 UNION STREET,SUITE 5450 SEATTLE, WA 98101-2327 (206)623-471I • CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE 1 2 I hereby certify that I have this 17th day of July, 2006, served a true and correct copy of the foregoing document upon the parties, via the methods noted below, properly addressed as 3 follows: Renton City Clerk X Hand Delivered 4 1055 South Grady Way 5 Renton, WA 98055 6 Attorney for First United Methodist Church: 7 G. Richard Hill Hand Delivered McCullough Hill Fikso Kretschmer Smith X U.S. Mail (first-class,postage prepaid) 8 2025 First Avenue, Suite 1130 Overnight Mail Seattle, WA 98121-2100 9 Facsimile 10 Attorney for City of Seattle,Department of Planning and Development: 11 Robert D. Tobin,Asst. City Attorney Hand Delivered Thomas A. Carr, Seattle City Attorney X U.S. Mail (first-class,postage prepaid) 12 600 Fourth Avenue,4th Floor Overnight Mail P.O. Box 94769 13 Seattle, WA 98124-4769 Facsimile Representative Agent for The Rainier Club: 14 do Michael Whalen Architecture Hand Delivered 15 1326 Fifth Avenue, Suite 640 X U.S. Mail (first-class,postage prepaid) Seattle, WA 98101 Overnight Mail 16 Facsimile 17 First United Methodist Church Hand Delivered 18 801 5th Avenue X U.S. Mail (first-class,postage prepaid) 19 Seattle, WA 98104 Overnight Mail 20 Facsimile 21 Rainier Club Hand Delivered 22 810 4th Avenue X U.S. Mail (first-class,postage prepaid) Seattle, WA 98104 Overnight Mail 23 Facsimile 24 25 LAND USE PETITION - PAGE 6 ATER WYNNE LLP 318514_1 DOC LAWYERS 601 UNION STREET,SUITE 5450 SEATTLE,WA 98101-2327 (206)623-4711 I declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the State of Washington that the 1 foregoing is true and correct. 2 DATED this 17th day of July, 2006, at Seattle, Washington. 3 4 Karen M. Lis 5 6 7 8 • 9 10 11 12 13 14 lore 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 *lo,r LAND USE PETITION - PAGE 7 ATER WYNNE LLP 318514_1.DOC LAWYERS 601 UNION S IREET,SUITE 5450 SEATTLE,WA 98101-2327 (206)623-4711 EXHIBIT A • RENTON CITY COUNCIL Regular Meeting June 26,2006 Council Chambers Monday, 7 p.m. MINUTES Renton City Hall CALL TO ORDER Mayor Kathy Keolker called the meeting of the Renton City Council to order and led the Pledge of Allegiance to the flag. ROLL CALL OF RANDY CORMAN,Council President;DON PERSSON;MARCIE PALMER; COUNCILMEMBERS FERRI BRIERE;DENIS LAW; DAN CLAWSON; TONI NELSON. CITY STAFF IN KATHY KEOLKER,Mayor, JAY COVINGTON, Chief Administrative ATTENDANCE Officer; LAWRENCE J. WARREN,City Attorney;BONNIE WALTON,City Clerk;GREGG ZIMMERMAN,Planning/Building/Public Works Administrator; TERRY HIGASHIYAMA, Community Services Administrator; PETER RENNER,Facilities Director;JERRY RERECICH,Recreation Director; ALEX PIETSCH,Economic Development Administrator;INTERIM CHIEF LARRY RUDE and DEPUTY CHIEF CHUCK DUFFY,Fire Department; KAREN MCFARLAND,Engineerine Specialist; MARTY WINE, Assistant CAO;CHIEF KEVIN MILOSEVICH and COMMANDER CHARLES MARSALISI,Police Department. PROCLAMATIONS A proclamation by Mayor Keolker was read declaring the month of July 2006 Parks and Recreation Month - to be "Parks and Recreation Month" in the City of Renton recognizing the vital July 2006 contributions of employees,community partners, and volunteers who keep public parks and recreation facilities clean and safe for visitors,organize activities,provide educational programming,and advocate for accessible places for all citizens to enjoy;and encouraging all citizens to join in this special observance. MOVED BY NELSON,SECONDED BY CORMAN,COUNCIL CONCUR IN THE PROCLAMATION. CARRIED. Recreation Director Jerry Rerecich accepted the proclamation along with representatives from the following groups: Renton Senior Activity Center co- ed softball team,Special Olympics softball team, T-ball program,Damn Yankees 2006 teen musical,Ballet program,and Renton Youth Council. Dr Dolores J Gibbons Day- A proclamation by Mayor Keolker was read declaring the day of June 23, 2006, June 23,2006 to be "Dr. Dolores J. Gibbons Day" in the City of Renton and encouraging all citizens to join in celebrating and thanking Dr. Gibbons for her outstanding service to this community. Dr. Gibbons served as the Renton School District's Superintendent for the past nine years. MOVED BY CLAWSON, SECONDED BY BRIERE, COUNCIL CONCUR IN THE PROCLAMATION CARRIED. Mayor Keolker reported that Dr. Gibbons was presented with the proclamation at her retirement gathering on June 23, SPECIAL PRESENTATION Interim Fire Chief Larry Rude reported that four individuals are the recipients Fire: Valor Awards of Awards of Valor for their recent heroic acts. Facilities Director Peter Renner explained that on April 21,City of Renton nighttime custodians Sidney Goodrow and Erendida "Wendy" Rodriguez noticed a little girl running across the Sam's Club parking lot (located next to City Hall)and gave chase when they realized she was going to cross S.Grady Way. Ms. Goodrow was able to stop traffic while Ms. Rodriguez caught the girl, narrowly preventing her from being New struck by a vehicle. In honor of their brave actions, Mr.Renner presented Ms. Goodrow and Ms. Rodriguez with Awards of Valor. June 26,2006 Renton City Council Minutes Page 222 Interim Fire Chief Rude explained that citizens Luis Garcia and Minerva Martinez were at Gene Coulon Memorial Beach Park on May 6,and upon hearing that a two-year-old boy had become separated from his parents,began **11101 to search for him. Mr. Garcia found the boy in the water,retrieved him,and then Ms.Martinez performed mouth to mouth rescue. Interim Fire Chief Rude reported that the boy is fine. In honor of their heroic act,he presented Mr. Garcia and Ms.Martinez with Awards of Valor. PUBLIC HEARING This being the date set and proper notices having been posted and published in Vacation:N 38th St.Tasca, accordance with local and State Iaws,Mayor Keolker opened the public hearing VAC-06-002 to consider the petition to vacate a portion of unimproved N.38th St. right-of- way,approximately 50 feet in width and 172 feet in length,located between Meadow Ave_N.and 1-405; petitioner James G. Tasca. Engineering Specialist Karen McFarland reported that 100 percent of the abutting property owners have signed the vacation petition,and the City does not have any facilities in the subject area. She relayed that the petitioner wants to use the vacated parcel in the future development of the adjacent parcels_ Upon circulation of the petition to City departments and outside agencies,Ms. McFarland reported that the Development Services Division objected to the vacation due to the probable expansion of I-405. Continuing, Ms. McFarland stated that Washington State Department of Transportation (WSDOT)staff was contacted regarding the proposed vacation_ She explained that WSDOT will need to obtain rights over the east 35 feet of the subject area,but had no objection to the vacation. Of the subject 35 feet, 15 feet will be acquired for the 1-405 expansion,and a subterranean easement is required over the remaining 20 feet. Ms.McFarland noted that the easement will prohibit any use of the land below the surface but allows the property owner the use of the surface of the land. Ms. McFarland indicated that staff recommends approval of the vacation request, subject to the following conditions: The petitioner to grant a subterranean easement to WSDOT over the west 20 feet of the aforementioned 35 feet, and the petitioner to convey his interest in the remaining east 15 feet to WSDOT. If the vacation is approved,she pointed out that the petitioner must obtain an appraisal of the subject property. Staff will then submit the appraisal to Council for a determination of compensation for the property. Public comment was invited. Harvey Cyr,LSIT(Land Surveyor in Training), 8547 29th Ave.NW, Seattle, 98117,expressed concern that the City was placing conditions on the vacation based upon WSDOT's preliminary plans_ He opined that it is highly unlikely that in their final plan. WSDOT is going to end up using the property they have requested for the I-405 expansion. There being no further public comment, it was MOVED BY LAW, SECONDED BY NELSON,COUNCIL CLOSE THE PUBLIC HEARING. CARRIED. MOVED BY LAW,SECONDED BY PALMER,COUNCIL APPROVE THE STREET VACATION REQUEST CONTINGENT UPON STAFF'S RECOMMENDATIONS_ CARRIED. S' • June 26,2006 Renton City Council Minutes Page 223 ADMINISTRATIVE Chief Administrative Officer Jay Covington reviewed a written administrative REPORT report summarizing the City's recent progress towards goals and work programs adopted as part of its business plan for 2006 and beyond. Items noted included: * Red, white,and blue decorations will adorn Gene Coulon Memorial Beach Park and spectacular fireworks will reflect off Lake Washington for the 2006 Freddie's Club of Renton Fabulous Fourth of July. The schedule of events kicks off mid-morning with the Chrome Classic July 4th Car Show, and culminates with a public fireworks display at 10:15 p.m. • The City will begin construction of the roadway and infrastructure improvements in support of The Landing project in July; with construction expected to be substantially completed by September 2007_ • Over 50 Waste Management garbage trucks rolled through Renton neighborhoods last Saturday collecting everything from mattresses and furniture, to scrap wood and carpeting. This week,over 100 residents will have their appliances picked up at the curbside and recycled. Solid Waste: Clean Sweep Councilwoman Nelson noted the comments she received regarding the success Program of the garbage collection event last Saturday,and she thanked everyone involved for continuing the Clean Sweep program. In response to Councilman Clawson's inquiry regarding the scheduled curbside recycling of appliances, Planning/Building/Public Works Administrator Gregg Zimmerman indicated that the deadline for residents to sign up and arrange for their appliances to be picked up was last week. He offered his contact information,saying that he would find out if any after-deadline requests could be accommodated. CONSENT AGENDA Items on the consent agenda are adopted by one motion which follows the listing. Council Meeting Minutes of Approval of Council meeting minutes of 6/19/2006. Council concur. 6/19/2006 Plat: Ridgeview Court, 4 Development Services Division recommended approval, with conditions,of the Bremerton Ave NE,FP-06-012 Ridgeview Court Final Plat;20 single-family lots on 2.4 acres located at Bremerton Ave. NE(FP-06-012). Council concur. (See page 226 for resolution.) Planning: 2005 Countywide Economic Development, Neighborhoods and Strategic Planning Department Planning Policies Amendments recommended adoption of a resolution ratifying the 2005 amendments to the Growth Management Planning Council's Countywide Planning Policies. Council concur. (See page 226 for resolution.) Plat: Highlands Park, Vesta Hearing Examiner recommended approval,with conditions, of the Highlands Ave SE, PP-05-124 Park Preliminary Plat; 73 single-family lots on 18.13 acres located at 115 Vesta Ave. SE(PP-05-124). Council concur. CAG: 05-I44, Benson Rd S, Transportation Systems Division submitted CAG-05-144, Benson Rd. S.(Main Dennis R Craig Construction Ave. S. to S. 26th St.); and requested approval of the project, authorization for final pay estimate in the amount of$121,479.87, commencement of 60-day lien period,and release of retainage in the amount of$24,271.05 to Dennis R.Craig Construction, Inc.,contractor,if all required releases are obtained. Council concur. +wr. June 26,2006 Renton City Council Minutes Page 224 Transportation: Hardie Ave Transportation Systems Division recommended approval of an agreement with SW Improvements, WSDOT Washington State Department of Transportation for a$150,000 Pedestrian and Grant Bicycle Safety Program grant for improvements to Hardie Ave.SW(SR-900— Hardie Ave. SW to Rainier Ave.). Council concur. (See page 226 for resolution.) Transportation: Rainier Ave Transportation Systems Division recommended approval of an agreement with (4th to 2nd)Improvements, Washington State Department of Transportation for a$200,000 Pedestrian and WSDOT Grant Bicycle Safety Program grant for improvements to Rainier Ave. (S.4th Pl. to S. 2nd St.)_ Council concur. (See page 226 for resolution.) MOVED BY CORMAN,SECONDED BY CLAWSON,COUNCIL APPROVE THE CONSENT AGENDA AS PRESENTED. CARRIED. Added Correspondence was read from Dick Unger,Leisure Estates Residents CORRESPONDENCE Association President,201 Union Ave. SE,#208,Renton,98059,requesting Citizen Comment: Unger- that Council oversee the water distribution system in Leisure Estates. MOVED Water Billing at Leisure BY CLAWSON, SECONDED BY LAW,COUNCIL REFER THIS Estates CORRESPONDENCE TO THE ADMINISTRATION. CARRIED. Councilman Clawson noted that staff will investigate the possibility of expanding the utility rate discount to those qualified residents who do not have meters. UNFINISHED BUSINESS Mayor Keolker read a memo from herself to Renton City Councilmembers Planning: Highlands Area regarding the Highlands area redevelopment strategies. The memo indicated Redevelopment,Mayor Memo that for more than a year,the Council and Administration have worked together to Council to explore ways to bring about a revitalization of the housing in this area. The memo noted the tools contemplated to reach that goal.the positive and negative responses by affected residents, the desire of many residents to clean up the area on their own terms,and her goal to create a safer and healthier neighborhood. The memo asked that Council "consider the following recommendations as a way to move forward together with a vision and direction for the Highlands,an essential neighborhood of our City: 1. Property owners and residents should have the opportunity to redevelop and/or otherwise improve their own properties under zoning regulations consistent with the Center Village vision,policies,and development regulations,but without the more centralized and strategic focus provided under the Community Renewal Act. Therefore,the City will not pursue the use of eminent domain or a Designation of Blight under the State Community Renewal Act at this time. 2. To provide this opportunity, the Planning and Development Committee should devise recommendations for zoning and development standards consistent with the adopted Center Village designation and present those recommendations to the City Council upon resolution of the environmental appeal now pending before the Hearing Examiner. Should the City Council determine this can best be accomplished with the help of a citizen advisory committee, the Administration stands ready to support that effort. 3_ Staff will bring map amendments related to the Highlands Subarea to the City Council for its consideration as part of the 2006 Comprehensive Plan amendment process. These amendments are likely to include adjustments June 26,2006 Renton City Council Minutes Page 225 to the boundaries of the Center Village to better reflect existing and potential land uses and their relationship to the residential and retail core of "ome the district. 4. The City will continue coordinating with the Renton Housing Authority to facilitate and foster redevelopment of the Authority's properties in the Highlands Subarea, work to disperse the concentration of low-income housing in the area,and increase the number of quality affordable housing units citywide_ 5. The City will provide assistance to Highlands Subarea property owners interested in redevelopment of their own properties or in selling or partnering with private or non-profit developers, if they are so inclined. 6. The City will vigorously pursue code enforcement actions and nuisance abatement proceedings against unsafe,unhealthful,derelict,and nuisance properties to the full extent of the law. 7. Assistance and encouragement will be provided through the City's Neighborhood Program to Highlands Subarea residents and property owners interested in organizing a recognized neighborhood association to improve the quality of life in their neighborhood." The Mayor's memo further noted why the City contemplated the use of the Community Renewal Act and the downside of not invoking the act,and her belief that attempts to involve the City in the Highlands have become so politically and emotionally charged that any use of the act at this time will not be successful. In conclusion,the memo stated, "In time,we may find that some of our original ideas will become necessary to bring about widespread improvements. At your direction, I will be happy to revisit these concepts. I want to work with the City Council to achieve a higher quality of life for lease residents in this area and all those impacted by it. But for now,I believe reduced City involvement is the most prudent course for us to pursue." Councilwoman Nelson noted JoAnn Fabric's parking lot resurfacing efforts,and said the revitalization discussions have made a difference in the Highlands area, as business and home owners are making improvements. Councilman Clawson indicated that the Mayor's memo is a good recognition of the situation. He noted the need to continue to be aware that housing rents are increasing,and to recognize that affordable housing in the Highlands is a treasure. Mr.Clawson stated that the current housing market may negatively affect that,and emphasized that the issue of affordable housing will need to be addressed in the future. Council President Corman thanked the Mayor for her comments,saying that her tone captures a lot of the Councilmember's feelings. He stated that the City would have liked to have done more, but the reality is that there is a difference of opinion regarding how to proceed. Mr. Corman noted that momentum has occurred which is causing improvements in the Highlands. He expressed his hope that the community will rally around the Mayor's proposal and that the momentum will continue_ Finance Committee Finance Committee Chair Persson presented a report recommending approval Finance: Vouchers of Claim Vouchers 249441 - 249942 and two wire transfers totaling $3,325,932.95; and approval of Payroll Vouchers 63774 -64059, one wire transfer, and 624 direct deposits totaling$2,049,813.16. MOVED BY PERSSON, SECONDED BY LAW,COUNCIL CONCUR IN THE COMMITTEE REPORT. CARRIED. June 26,2006 Renton City Council Minutes Page 226 Human Resources:2006 Finance Committee Chair Persson presented a report recommending Group Health Cooperative concurrence in the staff recommendation to approve the annual renewal of the Medical Coverage Contracts Group Health Cooperative medical coverage agreements as follows: LEOFF I (Law Enforcement Officers and Fire Fighters)employees(Contract No. 0390400); LEOFF 1 Retirees (Contract Nos. 0057500 and 4057500);and all other City of Renton covered employees(Contract No_ 1162600). Funding was previously approved by Council in the 2006 Budget. The revisions are applicable to all four of the renewal contracts. As in prior years,Group Health does not send confirming contracts for signature until mid year. The Committee further recommended that the Mayor and City Clerk be authorized to execute the contracts. MOVED BY PERSSON,SECONDED BY LAW,COUNCIL CONCUR IN THE COMMITTEE REPORT. CARRIED. CAG: 05-164,Henry Moses Finance Committee Chair Persson presented a report regarding the bid award Aquatic Center Lighting for the Henry Moses Aquatic Center Lighting Improvements Project. The Improvements, Scott's Electric Committee recommended concurrence in the staff recommendation to declare Service T.Miller Construction's bid as non-responsive,and award the project to the second lowest bidder,Scott's EIectric Service, LLC,.in the amount of 5239,344.77. The Committee further recommended that the Mayor and City Clerk be authorized to sign the contract. MOVED BY PERSSON, SECONDED BY LAW,COUNCIL CONCUR IN THE COMMITTEE REPORT. CARRIED. RESOLUTIONS AND The following resolutions were presented for reading and adoption: ORDINANCES Resolution#3823 A resolution was read approving the Ridgeview Court Final Plat; approximately Plat: Ridgeview Court, ` 2A acres located in the vicinity of 327 Bremerton Ave. NE. MOVED BY Bremerton Ave NE, FP-06-012 BRIERE, SECONDED BY CLAWSON,COUNCIL ADOPT THE RESOLUTION AS READ_ CARRIED. Resolution#3824 A resolution was read ratifying the amendments to the Countywide Planning Planning:2005 Countywide Policies. MOVED BY BRIERE,SECONDED BY CLAWSON,COUNCIL Planning Policies Amendments ADOPT THE RESOLUTION AS READ. CARRIED. Resolution#3825 A resolution was read authorizing the Mayor and City Clerk to enter into an Transportation: Hardie Ave interlocal cooperative agreement with the Washington State Department of SW Improvements, WSDOT Transportation to accept grant funds under a highways and local program State Grant funding agreement for the SR-900—Hardie Ave. SW to Rainier Ave. Project, for pedestrian and bicycle improvements. MOVED BY PALMER, SECONDED BY PERSSON,COUNCIL ADOPT THE RESOLUTION AS READ. CARRIED. Resolution #3826 A resolution was read authorizing the Mayor and City Clerk to enter into an Transportation: Rainier Ave interlocal cooperative agreement with the Washington State Department of (4th to 2nd) Improvements, Transportation to accept grant funds under a highways and local program State WSDOT Grant funding agreement for Rainier Ave.pedestrian and bicycle improvements. MOVED BY PALMER, SECONDED BY PERSSON, COUNCIL ADOPT THE RESOLUTION AS READ. CARRIED The following ordinance was presented for second and final reading and adopt ion: June 26,2006 Renton City Council Minutes Page 227 Ordinance#5213 An ordinance was read creating a budget with project appropriation set at Budget:2006 Amendments, $24,925,587 for the South Lake Washington Infrastructure Improvements Neer South Lake WA Infrastructure Project_ MOVED BY LAW,SECONDED BY CLAWSON,COUNCIL Improvements(The Landing) ADOPT THE ORDINANCE AS READ. ROLL CALL: ALL AYES. CARRIED. ADJOURNMENT MOVED BY NELSON, SECONDED BY CORMAN,COUNCIL ADJOURN. CARRIED. Time: 8:03 p.m. 07141-a ",d. lt1ai , Bonnie I. Walton,CMC,City Clerk Recorder: Michele Neumann June 26,2006 limov '1mrrr RENTON CITY COUNCIL COMMITTEE MEETING CALENDAR Office of the City Clerk COUNCIL COMMITTEE MEETINGS SCHEDULED AT CITY COUNCIL MEETING June 26,2006 I COMMITTEE/CHAIRMAN DATE/TIME AGENDA COMMITTEE OF THE WHOLE MON., 7/03 CANCELLED (Corman) MON., 7/10 CANCELLED COMMUNITY SERVICES MON., 7/03 CANCELLED (Nelson) FINANCE MON., 7/10 Vouchers; (Persson) 6 p_m. Fleet Hybrid Vehicles(briefing only) PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT THURS., 7/06 CANCELLED (Briere) ,441100 PUBLIC SAFETY MON., 7/03 CANCELLED (Law) TRANSPORTATION (AVIATION) THURS., 7/06 CANCELLED (Palmer) UTILITIES THURS., 7/06 Skyway Water&Sewer District Interlocal (Clawson) 4 p.m. Agreement; Springbrook Creek Wetland & Habitat Mitigation Bank Agreements NOTE Committee of the Whole meetings are held in the Council Chambers unless otherwise noted. All other committee meetings are held in the Council Conference Room unless otherwise noted. EXHIBIT B ALASKA &III SHANNON &WILSON INC. COLSOO ADO + FLORIDA GEOTECHNICAL AND ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTANTS OREGON WASHINGTON May 12,2006 Mr. Tom Foster Fourth Avenue Associates, LLC 6450 Southcenter Boulevard, Suite 106 Seattle, WA 98188 RE: EXISTING CONDITIONS REVIEW FOR THE FOURTH AVENUE ASSOCIATIES,LLC SITE IN RENTON,WASHINGTON,AS THEY PERTAIN TO A PROPOSED RELEASE OF STORMWATER ONTO THE SITE Dear Mr. Foster: At your request, Shannon &Wilson, Inc. has prepared this letter describing the conditions observed during our November 20, 1998,wetland and stream delineation on the former Ribera property located within the city limits of Renton,Washington(NE 1/4 of Section 15,Township 23 North, and Range 5 East, W.M.). Since our site visit in 1998,it is our understanding that the Ribera property has been subdivided 'god into two parcels, Parcel Nos. 518210-0020 and 0031. Parcel No. 518210-0031 is a rectangular lot located in the northeast corner of the former Ribera property and has since been developed as a U.S.postal office. The remaining portion of the former Ribera property(Parcel No. 518210-0020)is an L-shaped lot,located along the south side of NE 4th Street between Union Avenue NE and Bremerton Avenue NE, which is now known as the Fourth Avenue Associates, LLC Property(hereto referred as"the site"). This letter describes those conditions observed on the site at the time of our site visit in 1998. As a result of a proposed stormwater discharge system associated with a subdivision to the southwest of the site, you are primarily interested in our observations along the southern property boundary. BACKGROUND On November 20, 1998, Shannon&Wilson, Inc. conducted a wetland and stream delineation on the former Ribera property, the findings of which are presented in the Preliminary Wetland Delineation Ribera Property Report, dated December 1998. 'CO NORTH 34TH STREET • SUITE 100 21-1-12193-001 F 0 BOX 300303 SEATTLE. WASHINGTON 98103 206.632.8020 FAX 206.6956777 TDD: 1.800.833.6388 www shannonwdson corn Mr.Tom Foster SHANNON 6WlLSON,INC. Fourth Avenue Associates, LLC **or' May 12, 2006 Page 2 Our wetland and stream delineation occurred during a period of heavy rainfall. According to the Western Regional Climate Center summary for SeaTac International Airport (http://www.wrcc.dri.edu/cgi-bin/c1iMAIN.pl?waseat),November 1998 received a monthly precipitation total(11.62 inches),which was 195 percent above the historical mean(5.97 inches). During our wetland and stream delineation,two wetlands(Wetlands A and B) and one stream (Maplewood Creek)were identified on the site. The eastern half of the Ribera property was dominated by mature Douglas fir forest. The western half of the site was dominated by Scots broom,reed canarygrass, and Himalayan blackberry. Topography throughout the site generally slopes southwest,toward Maplewood Creek. Maplewood Creek entered the property in the northwest corner and flowed along the western property line. As it reached the southern property line,Maplewood Creek flowed east-southeast before it turned south off site. The property directly southeast of the site had been filled previously,creating an abrupt rise of approximately 15 feet along the south property line.. At the time of our site visit, there was no east-to-west surface conveyance located along the *sr' southern property line except the area associated with Maplewood Creek to the west. Although the topography generally sloped southwest toward Maplewood Creek, there was no defined drainage or drainage channel observed, despite the heavy rainfall that had occurred during and preceding our site visit. It is our understanding that the existing neighboring development (Ridgeview Court) southeast of the site has created a stormwater pond located on its southwest corner, adjacent to the site. It is also our understanding that the Ridgefield Court development has received approval by the City to discharge stormwater from this pond onto your site, into an east-to-west surface conveyance, reportedly located along the southern property line and into Maplewood Creek. Based on our site observation in l 998,no channel existed in this area that would accommodate the proposed stormwater discharge. CLOSURE The findings and conclusions documented in this letter have been prepared for specific application to this project, and have been developed in a manner consistent with the level of care yam, 21-I-12193-001-Ltrw•p-LKD 21-1-12193-001 Mr.Tom Foster SHANNON&WILSON,INC. Fourth Avenue Associates, LLC May 12,2006 Page 3 and skill normally exercised by members of the environmental science profession currently practicing under similar conditions in the area,and in accordance with the terms and conditions set forth in our signed proposal. The conclusions presented in this letter are professional opinions based on interpretation of information currently available to us, and are made within the operation scope,budget,and schedule constraints of this project. No warranty, express or implied,is made. Shannon&Wilson has prepared the enclosed "Important Information About Your Wetland Delineation/Mitigation and/or Stream Classification Report" to assist you and others in understanding the use and limitations of our report. Sincerely, SHANNON & WILSON, INC. /64 ,7 Katie L. Walter,P.W.S. Associate Natural Resources Manager PCJ_KLW/pcj Enclosure: Important information About Your Wetland Delineation/Mitigation and/or Stream Classification Report 21-1-12193-001-LI/9y1.10 21-1-12193-001 SHANNON &WILSON, INC. Geotechnical and Environmental Consultants Attachment to and part of Report 21-1-12193-001 MEN M Date: May 12,2006 'err/ To: Mr.Tom Foster Fourth Avenue Associates,LLC IMPORTANT INFORMATION ABOUT YOUR WETLAND DELINEATION/MITIGATION AND/OR STREAM CLASSIFICATION REPORT A WETLAND/STREAM REPORT IS BASED ON PROJECT-SPECIFIC FACTORS. Wetland delineation/mitigation and stream classification reports are based on a unique set of project-specific factors_ These typically include the general nature of the project and property involved,its size,and its configuration;historical use and practice;the location of the project on the site and its orientation; and the level of additional risk the client assumed by virtue of limitations imposed upon the exploratory program. The jurisdiction of any particular wetland/stream is determined by the regulatory authority(s)issuing the permit(s).As a result, one or more agencies will have jurisdiction over a particular wetland or stream with sometimes confusing regulations. It is necessary to involve a consultant who understands which agency(s)has jurisdiction over a particular wetland/stream and what the agency(s) permitting requirements are for that wetland/stream. To help reduce or avoid potential costly problems,have the consultant detennine how any factors or regulations(which can change subsequent to the report)may affect the recommendations. Unless your consultant indicates otherwise,your report should not be used: ► If the size or configuration of the proposed project is altered. *sty ► If the location or orientation of the proposed project is modified. ► If there is a change of ownership. For application to an adjacent site. ► For construction at an adjacent site or on site. ► Following floods,earthquakes,or other acts of nature_ Wetland/stream consultants cannot accept responsibility for problems that may develop if they are not consulted after factors considered in their reports have changed. Therefore,it is incumbent upon you to notify your consultant of any factors that may have changed prior to submission of our final report. Wetland boundaries identified and stream classifications made by Shannon&Wilson are considered preliminary until validated by the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers(Corps)and/or the local jurisdictional agency. Validation by the regulating agency(s)provides a certification, usually written,that the wetland boundaries verified are the boundaries that will be regulated by the agency(s)until a specified date,or until the regulations are modified,and that the stream has been properly classified. Only the regulating agency(s)can provide this certification. MOST WETLAND/STREAM"FINDINGS"ARE PROFESSIONAL ESTIMATES. Site exploration identifies wetland/stream conditions at only those points where samples are taken and when they are taken,but the physical means of obtaining data preclude the determination of precise conditions. Consequently, the information obtained is intended to be sufficiently accurate for design,but is subject to interpretation. Additionally,data derived through sampling and subsequent laboratory testing are extrapolated by the consultant who then renders an opinion about overall conditions,the likely reaction to proposed construction activity,and/or appropriate design. Even under optimal circumstances,actual conditions may differ from those thought to exist because no consultant,no matter how qualified,and no exploration program,no matter how comprehensive,can reveal what is hidden by earth,rock, and time. Nothing can be done to prevent the unanticipated,but steps can be taken to help reduce their impacts. For this reason,most experienced owners retain their consultants through the construction or wetland mitigation/stream classification stage to identify variances, to conduct additional evaluations that may be needed,and to recommend solutions to problems encountered on site. Page 1 of 2 1/2006 WETLAND/STREAM CONDITIONS CAN CHANGE. Since natural systems are dynamic systems affected by both natural processes and human activities,changes in wetland boundaries and stream conditions may be expected. Therefore, delineated wetland boundaries and stream classifications cannot remain valid for an indefinite period of time. The Corps typically recognizes the validity of wetland delineations for a period of five years after completion. Some city and county agencies recognize the validity of wetland delineations for a period of two years. If a period of years have passed since the wetland/stream report was completed,the owner is advised to have the consultant reexamine the wetland/stream to determine if the classification is still accurate. Construction operations at or adjacent to the site and natural events such as floods,earthquakes, or water fluctuations may also affect conditions and,thus,the continuing adequacy of the wetland/stream report. The consultant should be kept apprised of any such events and should be consulted to determine if additional evaluation is necessary. THE WETLAND/STREAM REPORT IS SUBJECT TO MISINTERPRETATION. Costly problems can occur when plans are developed based on misinterpretation of a wetland/stream report. To help avoid these problems, the consultant should be retained to work with other appropriate professionals to explain relevant wetland,stream,geological,and other findings,and to review the adequacy of plans and specifications relative to these issues. DATA FORMS SHOULD NOT BE SEPARATED FROM THE REPORT. Final data forms are developed by the consultant based on interpretation of field sheets (assembled by site personnel) and laboratory evaluation of field samples. Only final data forms customarily are included in a report_ These data forms should not, under any circumstances,be drawn for inclusion in other drawings because drafters may commit errors or omissions in the transfer process. Although photographic reproduction eliminates this problem,it does nothing to reduce the possibility of misinterpreting the forms_ When this occurs, delays,disputes,and unanticipated costs are frequently the result. To reduce the likelihood of data form misinterpretation,contractors,engineers,and planners should be given ready access to the complete report. Those who do not provide such access may proceed under the mistaken impression that simply disclaiming responsibility for the accuracy of information always insulates them from attendant liability Providing the best available information to contractors,engineers, and planners helps prevent costly problems and the adversarial attitudes that aggravate them to a disproportionate scale. READ RESPONSIBILITY CLAUSES CLOSELY. Because a wetland delineation/stream classification is based extensively on judgment and opinion,it is far less exact than other design disciplines. This situation has resulted in wholly unwarranted claims being lodged against consultants. To help prevent this problem, consultants have developed a number of clauses for use in written transmittals. These are not exculpatory clauses designed to foist the consultant's liabilities onto someone else;rather,they are definitive clauses that identify where the consultant's responsibilities begin and end. Their use helps all parties involved recognize their individual responsibilities and take appropriate action. Some of these definitive clauses are likely to appear in your report,and you are encouraged to read them closely. Your consultant will be pleased to give full and frank answers to your questions. THERE MAY BE OTHER STEPS YOU CAN TAKE TO REDUCE RISK. Your consultant will be pleased to discuss other techniques or designs that can be employed to mitigate the risk of delays and to provide a variety of alternatives that may be beneficial to your project. Contact your consultant for further information. Page 2 of 2 1/2006 April 11,2006 c'TroFFENT0n APR 13 2006 Neil R. Watts,Director EU1LDINGDNISION Development Services City of Renton 1055 South Grady Way Renton,WA. 98055 Re: Ridgeview Court Storm Drainage To Whom It May Concern: Thank you for meeting with me and Jim Hanson last week. We appreciate your concern in this matter and also wish that an administrative resolution can be obtained prior to Final Plat and Plat recording. This issue should not be carried forward to a Homeowner's Association. Due to our concerns as to the possible impact on our property with additional storm drainage, ,ori''' we formally request that copies of all notifications regarding this plat be forwarded to: Thomas Foster,4TH Avenue Associates,6450 Southcenter Blvd.,Suite 106, Seattle,WA. 98188. Thank you for your attention to this matter. We hope for a resolution in the near future. Sincerely, `J Thomas Foster Cc: Kavren Kittrick Mike Dotson Tom Foster From: Michael Dotson [Mdotson@ci.renton.wa.us} Sent: Thursday, February 23, 2006 4:10 PM To: Tom Foster Cc: Arneta Henninger; Dan Thompson; Kayren Kittrick;Neil Watts; Pat Miller Subject: Re: Ridgeview Court Tom, We have received a response to the letter I sent to Cliff Williams on February 6, 2006, concerning the drainage onto your property. In consideration of your concerns (the outfall of the new detention system) , the design engineer for Ridgeview Court reviewed the predeveloped downstream data. As you are aware, the offsite analysis did not identify a closed depression or a low spot in the outfall area on your property. The design engineer surmised that a low spot or depression has accidentally been constructed off site - downstream of the Ridgeview Court detention vault since the original field inspection. They also concluded that the subject low area where ponding has been reported does not meet the definition of a "closed depression." Per the 1998 KCSWDM, the definition of a closed depression is as follows; an area which is low-lying and either has no surface water outlet, or has limited outlet that during storm events the area acts as a retention basin, with more than 5,000 sf of surface water area at the overflow elevation. American Engineering determined that this area is calculated to consist of approximately 3,070 sf of surface area at the overflow elevation. Hence, this area does not meet the definition of a "closed depression". Therefore they maintain that no further flow control or safety factors are required for the Ridgeview Court detention system. I know that this is in conflict with your views and opinion. We obviously have a discrepancy. However, to resolve this disagreement is a Civil matter, between the property owners. The City of Renton has reviewed the information provided and approved the Ridgeview Court design based on the engineers analysis and compliance with the code requirements. Hopefully some resolution to this matter can be worked out between 4th Avenue Associates, LLC, and the owner(s) of Ridgeview Court. Mike Michael D. Dotson Engineering - Plan Review email: mdotson@ci_renton.wa.us Office # 425-430-7304 Fax # 425-430-7300 >>> "Tom Foster" <TFoster@SeattleMortgaae.com> 2/21/06 3:06:05 PM >>> Hi Mike, I have attached a letter regarding the storm water issue (discharge point) for Ridgeview Court. Please advise us of the response to your letter date 2-6-06. Thank you_ Tom Foster 1 CVO 401 09110 ATER WYNNE 4002/002 — CITY OF RENTON ♦ wit ♦ PlanningfBuilding/PublicWorka Department Kathy Keotker,Mayor - Gregg Zimmerman Pdu.,Administrator March 2I,2006 COPY RECEIVED. Joel K.Paisner MAR 2 2 ZD06 - Ater Wynne LLP 601 Union Street, Suite 5450 ATER WYNNE UP Seaulc,WA 98101-2327 - Subject: Ridgevicw Crest PP Drainage _ • Dear Mr. Paisner_ The City of Renton is in receipt of your letter.dated March 13,2006,regarding the subject project lie referenced letter details the concerns of your client regarding drainage and a claim of a complete alteration of the surface water pattern between two developments located generally south of NE 4th S between Union Avenue NE and Bremerton Avenue NE. The historic flow of surface water in this . :a appears to be from west to east across both properties,into a wetland on your client's property,and continuing west to Maplewood Creek and south eventually to the-Cedar River. The Engineers for both projects have demonstrated compliance with the appropriate King County Su ace Design Manual. Statements from both sides have not substantivelyproven omission or any case of n. - compliance_ Water courses may not be diverted from a property,and all properties have the general roar' requirement to provide for upstream water across to the historical drainage point. Upstream propertie are required to maintain the status quo of the quantity and release rate of water. This protects surface was: features such as wetlands.streams and fish habitat from both flooding and drying out beyond normal cycles. The Stop Work order referenced was regarding dewatering only and has been resolved. The City of Renton's requirements for development of the Ridgeview Crest preliminary plat are met. Thank you '•r the information that an easement is being negotiated,but this is a private easement between the two properties and not to the City of Renton. Sc no assistance to or by the City of Renton is necessary_ is continues to be a private property dispute to be resolved to the owners' satisfactions. If you have questions.please contact Michael Dotson.project manager,at(425)430-7304. Sincerely. ` �^ tlyl(lu Kayren K.Kittrick Development Engineering Supervisor Public Works inspections&Permits Development Services Division cc: Neil Watts_Development Service%Director Michael Dotson.Engineering Specialist nutty° Prr. n1.Y A ER [/�J� Suite 5450 1�l ER.Y V i NNEL LLP 601 Union Seattle,WA 98101-2327 ATTORNLY$ AT LAW 206-623-4711 Fax:206-467-8406 111111, www.aterwynne.com ynne.com March 13, 2006 Mr. Neil Watts, Director Development Services, City of Renton 1055 South Grady Way,6th Floor, Renton, WA. 98055 Re: Ridgeview Crest Drainage Dear Mr. Watts: We represent Fourth Avenue Associates,LLC and are writing regarding the serious drainage issues that are about to be approved by the City of Renton through its approval of the final plat of Ridgeview Crest. Our clients have been working with City staff to demonstrate how the drainage systems adjacent to their current development have been altered, and how the City is approving an altered drainage system. The outfall of the drainage channel serving these properties has been blocked resulting in the pooling of water,erosion of the property and a failure of the existing natural drainage system. Our client has visited the site with the City engineer as well as representatives of the adjacent plat of Ridgeview Crest. During this visit, it was obvious to all parties that water was ponding on our client's property. This ponding did not occur prior to the construction of the improvements at Ridgeview Crest. Our engineers have reviewed the engineering report prepared for Ridgeview Crest_ It appears that there is a serious error in this report. There is a discrepancy between what the report shows as conditions on the ground, and what is present on site. It is difficult to determine where the original drainage channel existed. Wherever it was, it now appears to be buried under a large amount of unapproved fill. We understand that the inspector for the plat has come to inspect the drainage and has issued Stop Work Order. We also understand that when Ridgeview Crest excavated to put in its stormwater vault, it removed nearly 12 feet of fill. That seems to be an indication that the topography, as represented in the engineenng report that the City of Renton is relying upon,has been altered_ We believe it is important to evaluate and consider surface water conditions as they currently are rather than what they were several years ago. We are concerned that if the City of Renton issues final plat approval for the plat of Ridgeview Crest, it will be approving on a permanent basis; a complete alteration in how the surface water enters, flows through our client's property, and leaves the property. Such approval invites future civil claims and potential liability for all parties involved. Rather than ignore the issue, and treat it as a "civil matter"between private land owners, it is incumbent upon the City to solve the problem. COPY TOR YOUR MENLO PAR K PO R TLA ND S E A TT LE 305040 I'JRP%102341-0000 ATERWYNNE LIP Mr.Neil Watts, 'ob" March 13,2006 Page 2 We are willing to assist the City in this resolution by negotiating an easement to provide a tightlined pipe to allow the surface water to flow where the Downstream Storm Drainage Analysis of September 2005 had indicated it has traditionally flowed_ Very truly yours, ATER WYNNE LLP Oir Jo •• Paisner cc: Kayren Kittrick,Plan Review Engineering Specialist Mike Dotson,Plan Review Engineering Pat Miller,Inspector for the City of Renton C.Thomas Foster Igoe iftse 308040_1/MP/102341-0000 1 RECEIVED In King County Superior Court Clerk's OfIlce *441110 2 3 JUL 17 2006 4 `^ Casttie►S?drn Supteior Court clerk 5 CITY OF PENTON 6 JUL 1 7 2006 7 RECEIVED 8 SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON CITY CLERK'S OFFICE FOR THE COUNTY OF KING 4: !off /3'j r 9 Nand �kl� �" by wA J.e9Q�seiv/ees LANGLEY 4TH AVENUE ASSOCIATES, No-06 -2 - 23030 0 - 2 foils 10 LLC, 11 Petitioners, SUMMONS (20 DAY) 12 v. 13 CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON; RIDGEVIEW COURT, LLC;AND CLIFF 14 WILLIAMS,APPLICANT, 15 Res I ondents. 16 TO THE DEFENDANT: 17 A lawsuit has been started against you in the above entitled court by LANGLEY 4TH 18 AVENUE ASSOCIATES, LLC,plaintiff. Plaintiffs claim is stated in the written complaint, a 19 copy of which is served upon you with this summons. 20 In order to defend against this lawsuit, you must respond to the complaint by stating your 21 defense in writing, and by serving a copy upon the person signing this summons within 20 22 days after the service of this summons, excluding the day of service, or a default judgment may 23 be entered against you without notice. A default judgment is one where plaintiff is entitled to 24 what he asks for because you have not responded. If you serve a notice of appearance on the 25 undersigned person, you are entitled to notice before a default judgment may be entered. SUMMONS (20 DAY) - PAGE 1 ATER WYNNE LLP NIS 318555_I.DOC LAWYERS 601 UNION STREET,SUITE 5450 SEATTLE,WA 98101-2327 (206)623-4711 1 You may demand that the plaintiff file this lawsuit with the court. If you do so, the 2 demand must be in writing and must be served upon the person signing this summons. Within 3 14 days after you serve the demand, the plaintiff must file this lawsuit with the court, or the 4 service on you of this summons and complaint will be void. 5 If you wish to seek the advice of an attorney in this matter, you should do so promptly so 6 that your written response, if any, may be served on time. 7 This summons is issued pursuant to rule 4 of the Superior Court Civil Rules of the State 8 of Washington. 9 DATED this 17th day of July,2006. 10 ATER 'YNNE LL C)..7„ 11 j1 By: 4Ai 12 Jo: Paisner, BA#16405 P. I Brain, WSBA #13438 13 Att. eys for Petitioners �, 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 `v" SUMMONS (20 DAY) - PAGE 2 ATER WYNNE LLP 318555_1 DOC LAWYERS 601 UNION STREET,SUITE 5450 SEATTLE,W A 98101-2327 (206)623-4711 CITY OF RENT0N JUL< 1 7 2006 RECEIVED t lam `CLERKS DERCE, f/pin h{2,2d De/'Ucrei ter ht beery 51res• IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON IN AND FOR THE COUNTY OF KING LANGLEY 4TH AVENUE ASSOCIATES, LLC NO. 06-2-23030-2 KNT Order Setting Case Schedule(Land Use Petition vs Petitioner(s) -RCW 36.70C)(*ORSCS) CITY OF RENTON, ET AL ASSIGNED JUDGE White 8 FILE DATE: 07/17/2006 Respondent(s) TRIAL DATE: 12/18/2006 A Petition Seeking Review of a Land Use decision under the Revised Code of Washington (RCW) 36.70C has been filed in the King County Superior Court and will be managed by the Case Schedule on Page 3 as ordered by the King County Superior Court Presiding Judge. I. NOTICES THE PERSON (PETITIONER)SEEKING REVIEW OF A LAND USE DECISION MUST: 1 File a Land Use Petition within the time frames as instructed by applicable RCW 36.70C.040. 2. Serve a copy of the Land Use Petition and this Order Setting Case Schedule (Land Use Petition) (including these Notices) on all other parties to this action. You, as the person who started this Petition, must make sure the other person and/or agency is notified of your action and gets a copy of the Schedule. See Revised Code of Washington RCW 36.70C.040(5). Your signature must appear on this form showing that you understand that you must make sure the other person and/or agency gets a copy of this form. 3. Pay the statutory filing fee to the Clerk of the Superior Court in which the Petition is filed. NOTICE TO ALL PARTIES: All attorneys and parties should make themselves familiar with the rules of the court -- especially those referred to in this Schedule. In order to comply with the Schedule, it will be necessary for attorneys and parties to pursue their appeals vigorously from the day they are filed. All events must occur promptly. If they are late, the Superior Court Clerk is authorized by the King County Superior Court Local Rules to schedule the petition for a dismissal hearing. "I understand that I am required to give a copy of these documents to all parties in this case." Print Name Sign Name Order Setting Case Schedule (Land Use Petition - RCW 36.70C)(*ORSCS) REV.6/200 1 I. NOTICES (continued) STIPULATION/MOTION TO CHANGE INITIAL HEARING: Parties may file a stipulation or any party may file a motion to change the initial hearing prior to the deadline as shown on the Schedule. A copy of the stipulation or motion must be filed with the assigned Judge. Preliminary hearings must be set on Fridays. Stipulated change of hearing dates must be within +/- 7 days of the original date and must be approved by the assigned judge. MOTIONS ON JURISDICTIONAL AND PROCEDURAL ISSUES: Motions on jurisdictional and procedural issues shall comply with Civil Rule 7 and King County Local Rule 7, except that the minimum notice of hearing requirement shall be 8 days. PENDING DUE DATES CANCELED BY FILING PAPERS THAT RESOLVE THE CASE: When a final decree, judgment, or order of dismissal of all claims is filed with the Superior Court Clerk's Office, and a courtesy copy delivered to the assigned judge, all pending due dates in this Schedule are automatically canceled, including the scheduled Trial Date. It is the responsibility of the parties to 1) file such dispositive documents within 45 days of the resolution of the case, and 2)strike any pending motions by notifying the bailiff of the assigned judge. Parties may also authorize the Superior Court to strike all pending due dates and the Trial Date by filing a Notice of Settlement pursuant to KCLR 41, and forwarding a courtesy copy to the assigned judge. If a final decree,judgment or order of dismissal of all claims is not filed by 45 days after a Notice of Settlement, the case may be dismissed with notice. If you miss your scheduled Trial Date, the Superior Court Clerk is authorized by KCLR 41(b)(2)(A) to present an Order of Dismissal, without notice, for failure to appear at the scheduled Trial Date. NOTICES OF APPEARANCE OR WITHDRAWAL AND ADDRESS CHANGES: 'Nrr All parties to this action must keep the court informed of their addresses. When a Notice of Appearance/Withdrawal or Notice of Change of Address is filed with the Superior Court Clerk's Office, parties must provide the assigned judge with a courtesy copy. NOTICE OF NON-COMPLIANCE FEES: ALL parties will be assessed a fee authorized by King County Code 4.71.050 whenever the Superior Court Clerk must send notice of non-compliance of schedule requirements as per Local Rule 4 and/or dismissal of actions as per Local Rule 41. King County Local Rules are available for viewing at www.metrokc.gov/kcscc. laarr Order Setting Case Schedule (Land Use Petition -RCW 36.70C) (*ORSCS) REV. 6/200 2 II.CASE SCHEDULE DEADLINE or Filing CASE EVENT EVENT DATE Needed Petition for Review of Land Use Decision Filed and Schedule Issued [See Mon 07/17/2006 * RCW 36.70C.040]. DEADLINE to Contact Assigned Judge to Confirm Initial Hearing [See Mon 07/24/2006 RCW 36.70C.080]. DEADLINE to Stipulate or File a Motion for Change of Hearing Date or Mon 08/14/2006 * Adjustment of Schedule [See RCW 36.70C.080(1);RCW 36.70.090)]. Initial Hearing on Jurisdictional and Preliminary Matters(FRIDAYS ONLY) Fri 09/08/2006 [See RCW 36.70C.080)]. DEADLINE for Filing Certified Copy of the Local Jurisdiction Record [See Thu 10/19/2006 * RCW 36.70C.110]. DEADLINE for filing Brief of Petitioner[See RCW 36.70C.080(4)]. Mon 11/13/2006 * DEADLINE for filing Brief of Respondent[See RCW 36.70C.080(4)]. Mon 12/04/2006 * DEADLINE for filing Reply Briefs[See RCW 36.70C.080(4)]. Mon 12/11/2006 * Review Hearing/Trial Date [See RCW 36.70C.090]. Mon 12/18/2006 III. ORDER Pursuant to the Revised Code of Washington(RCW 36.70C) the King County Superior Court issues an Order Setting Case Schedule(Land Use Petition)when a Land Use Petition is filed with the King County Superior Court. It is ORDERED that all parties involved in this action shall comply with the schedule listed above and that failure to meet these event dates will result in the dismissal of the petition. It is FURTHER ORDERED that the party filing this action must serve this Order Setting Case Schedule (Land Use Petition)and attachment on all other parties. No"' DATED: 07/17/2006 PRESIDING JUDGE Order Setting Case Schedule (Land Use Petition - RCW 36.70C) (*ORSCS) REV.6/200 3 IV.ORDER ON CML PROCEEDINGS FOR ASSIGNMENT TO JUDGE err READ THIS ORDER PRIOR TO CONTACTING YOUR ASSIGNED JUDGE This case is assigned to the Superior Court Judge whose name appears in the caption of this Schedule. The assigned Superior Court Judge will preside over and manage this case for all pre-trial matters. COMPLEX LITIGATION: If you anticipate an unusually complex or lengthy trial, please notify the assigned court as soon as possible. The following procedures hereafter apply to the processing of this case: APPLICABLE RULES: a. Except as specifically modified below, all the provisions of King County Local Rules 4 through-26 shall apply to the processing of civil cases before Superior Court Judges. CASE SCHEDULE AND REQUIREMENTS: A. Show Cause Hearing:A Show Cause Hearing will be held before the Chief Civil/Chief RJC judge if the case does not have confirmation of service on all parties, answers to all claims, crossclaims, or counterclaims as well as the confirmation of joinder or statement of arbitrability filed before the deadline in the attached case schedule. All parties will receive an Order to Show Cause that will set a specific date and time for the hearing. Parties and/or counsel who are required to attend will be named in the order. B. Pretrial Order: An order directing completion of a Joint Confirmation of Trial Readiness Report will be mailed to all parties approximately six(6)weeks before trial. This order will contain deadline dates for the pretrial events listed in King County Local Rule 16: 1) Settlement/Mediation/ADR Requirement; 2) Exchange of Exhibit Lists; 3) Date for Exhibits to be available for review; 4) Deadline for disclosure of witnesses; 5) Deadline for filing Joint Statement of Evidence; 6)Trial submissions, such as briefs, Joint Statement of Evidence,jury instructions; ANN ,, 7)voir dire questions, etc; 8) Use of depositions at trial; 9) Deadlines for nondispositive motions; 10) Deadline to submit exhibits and procedures to be followed with respect to exhibits; 11)Witnesses--identity, number, testimony; C. Joint Confirmation regarding Trial Readiness Report: No later than twenty one(21)days before the trial date, parties shall complete and file(with a copy to the assigned judge)a joint confirmation report setting forth whether a jury demand has been filed, the expected duration of the trial, whether a settlement conference has been held, and special problems and needs (e.g. interpreters, equipment), etc. If parties wish to request a CR 16 conference, they must contact the assigned court. Plaintiff/petitioner's counsel is responsible for contacting the other parties regarding said report. D. Settlement/Mediation/ADR: 1) Forty five(45)days before the Trial Date, counsel for plaintiff shall submit a written settlement demand. Ten (10) days after receiving plaintiffs written demand, counsel for defendant shall respond (with a counteroffer, if appropriate). 2) Twenty eight(28)days before the Trial Date, a settlement/mediation/ADR conference shall have been held. FAILURE TO COMPLY WITH THIS SETTLEMENT CONFERENCE REQUIREMENT MAY RESULT IN SANCTIONS. E. Trial: Trial is scheduled for 9:00 a.m. on the date on the Schedule oras soon thereafter as convened by the court. The Friday before trial, the parties should access the King County Superior Court website at www.metrokc.gov/kcsc to confirm trial judge assignment. Information can also be obtained by calling(206)205-5984. MOTIONS PROCEDURES_ A. Noting of Motions Dispositive Motions: All Summary Judgment or other motions that dispose of the case in whole — or in part will be heard with oral argument before the assigned judge.The moving party must arrange with the courts a date and time for the hearing, consistent with the court rules. King County Local Rule 7 and King County Local Rule 56 govern procedures for all summary judgment or other motions that dispose of the case in whole or in part.The local rules can be found at www.metrokc.gov/kcscc. Nondispositive Motions:These motions,which include discovery motions,will be ruled on by the assigned judge without oral argument, unless otherwise ordered.All such motions must be noted for a date by which the ruling is requested; this date must likewise conform to the applicable notice requirements. Rather than noting a time of day,the Note for Motion should state"Without Oral Argument." King County Local Rule 7 governs these motions,which include discovery motions. The local rules can be found at www.metrokc.gov/kcscc. Motions in Family Law Cases not involving children: Discovery motions to compel, motions in limine, motions relating to trial dates and motions to vacate judgments/dismissals shall be brought before the assigned judge. All other motions should be noted and heard on the Family Law Motions Calendar. King County Local Rule 7 and King County Family Law Local Rules govern these procedures.The local rules can be found at www.metrokc.gov/kcscc. Emergency Motions: Emergency motions will be allowed only upon entry of an Order Shortening Time. However, emergency discovery disputes may be addressed by telephone call, and without written motion, if the judge approves. Filing of Documents All original documents must be filed with the Clerk's Office. The working copies of all documents in support or opposition must be marked on the upper right corner of the first page with the date of consideration or hearing and the name of the assigned judge. The assigned judge's working copy must be delivered to his/her courtroom or to the judges' mailroom. Do not file working copies with the Motions Coordinator, except those motions to be heard on the Family Law Motions Calendar, in which case the working copies should be filed with the Family Law Motions Coordinator. Original Proposed Order: Each of the parties must include in the working copy materials submitted on any motion an original proposed order sustaining his/her side of the argument. Should any party desire a copy of the order as signed and filed by the judge, a preaddressed, stamped envelope shall accompany the proposed order. Presentation of Orders:All orders, agreed or otherwise, must be presented to the assigned judge. If that judge is absent, contact the assigned court for further instructions. If another judge enters an order on the case, counsel is responsible for providing the assigned judge with a copy. Proposed orders finalizing settlement and/or dismissal by agreement of all parties shall be presented to the assigned judge or in the Ex Parte Department. Formal proof in Family Law cases must be scheduled before the assigned judge by contacting the bailiff, or formal proof may be entered in the Ex Parte Department. If final orders and/or formal proof are entered in the Ex Parte Department, counsel is responsible for providing the assigned judge with a copy. C. Form: Memoranda/briefs for matters heard by the assigned judge may not exceed twenty four(24) pages for dispositive motions and twelve (12) pages for nondispositive motions, unless the assigned judge permits over-length memoranda/briefs in advance of filing. Over-length memoranda/briefs and motions supported by such memoranda/briefs may be stricken. IT IS SO ORDERED. FAILURE TO COMPLY WITH THE PROVISIONS OF THIS ORDER MAY RESULT IN DISMISSAL OR OTHER SANCTIONS. PLAINTIFF/PETITIONER SHALL FORWARD A COPY OF THIS ORDER AS SOON AS PRACTICABLE TO ANY PARTY WHO HAS NOT RECEIVED THIS ORDER. PRESIDING JUDGE CITY OF RENTON COUNCIL AGENDA BILL AI#: t , Submitting Data: For Agenda of: Dept/Div/Board.. Community Services/Parks/Golf August 7, 2006 Staff Contact Leslie Betlach (ext. 6619) Agenda Status Kelly Beymer(ext. 6803) Consent X Subject: Public Hearing.. Authorization for use of funds from Maplewood Golf Correspondence.. Course reserve fund balance Ordinance X Resolution Old Business Exhibits: New Business Issue Paper Study Sessions Ordinance Information Recommended Action: Approvals: Refer to Finance Committee Legal Dept X Finance Dept X Other Fiscal Impact: Expenditure Required... $20,000 Transfer/Amendment Amount Budgeted $0 Revenue Generated Total Project Budget $0 City Share Total Project.. SUMMARY OF ACTION: The Community Services Department requests the use of funds from the Maplewood Golf Course reserve fund balance (Account 404) for water right attorney fees to assist in the water rights change application and perfection of existing water right claim for the purpose of irrigating the golf course. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Approve request to authorize use of funds from the golf course reserve fund balance in the amount of$20,000 and adopt the Ordinance. 1411.1 Rentonnetiagnbill/ bh rcY 0� COMMUNITY SERVICES DEPARTMENT 'eP MEMORANDUM NT DATE: July 10, 2006 TO: Randy Corman, Council President Members of the Renton City Council VIA: Kathy Keolker, Mayor FROM: Terry Higashiyama, Community Services Administrator STAFF CONTACT: Leslie Betlach, Parks Director(X6619) Kelly Beymer, Golf Course Manager(X6803) SUBJECT: Authorization—Use of Funds from Golf Course Reserve Fund Balance for Water Rights Attorney Fees ISSUE Should Maplewood Golf Course be authorized to spend $20,000 from the (#404 account) reserve fund balance to initiate a legal consultant contract with water rights Attorney .. • Kathryn Gerla of Foster Pepper PLLC to assist in perfecting a golf course water rights claim? RECOMMENDATION Authorize spending of Maplewood Golf Course's reserve fund balance to contract a water. rights legal consultant, Kathryn Gerla, of Foster Pepper PLLC for legal services to include historical research, communications with the Department of Ecology(DOE) and review of findings with city staff in the amount of$20,000. BACKGROUND SUMMARY Maplewood Golf Course submitted a water rights change application to the Department of Ecology(DOE) in 1999 to change from the use of surface water to groundwater for irrigation purposes. In April 2003 DOE contacted the golf course to notify that the process of the claim to change the surface water rights to ground water is moving ahead. In order for this process to move forward the City of Renton's Maplewood Golf Course has been asked to provide proof to DOE to validate/perfect the water rights claim and the use of the surface water source prior to 1917. Golf course and city staff has provided DOE with findings from historical research, water quality testing results, and annual irrigation figures. DOE has responded that the information provided is not enough to perfect the current water rights claim. Administration and city attorney have recommended the use of an attorney that specializes ems,„ in water rights and communications with DOE to provide legal consulting through this process. h:\leslie\issue paper waterrights consultant2.doc Amok Randy Corman,Council President Members of the Renton City Council Subject: Authorization for use of Golf Course Reserve Fund Balance Page 2 of 2 July 10,2006 CONCLUSION The approval of authorization for the use of Maplewood Golf Course reserve fund balance will allow contracting of a water rights legal consultant to assist in the water rights change application and the perfection of existing surface water claim, and allowing Maplewood Golf Course to continue to irrigate and maintain its high standards and quality product. C: Jay Covington,Chief Administrative Officer Mike Bailey,Administrator Finance/IS Larry Warren,City Attorney Ned h:\leslie\issue paper waterrights consultant2.doc CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON ORDINANCE NO. AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON, AMENDING THE 2006 BUDGET TO AUTHORIZE $20,000 FROM GOLF COURSE FUND BALANCE TO APPROPRIATE FOR WATER RIGHT ATTORNEY FEES. NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON, DOES ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS: SECTION I. The appropriation in the Golf Course Fund is hereby increased as follows: Fund 2006 Original Budget 2006 Adjusted Budget Increase Budget 404 $2,421,880 $20,000 $2,441,880 +4110SECTION II. This project will be funded by the Golf Course Fund prior year revenue. SECTION III. This ordinance shall become effective immediately upon its passage, approval, and five(5) days after publication. PASSED BY THE CITY COUNCIL this day of , 2006. Bonnie I. Walton, City Clerk APPROVED BY THE MAYOR this day of , 2006. Kathy Keolker, Mayor 1 ORDINANCE NO. Approved as to form: Lawrence J. Warren, City Attorney Date of Publication: ORD.1276:7/27/06:ma 2 I CITY OF RENTON COUNCIL AGENDA BILL AI#: 1' 1+ Submitting Data: For Agenda of: Dept/Div/Board.. EDNSP/Strategic Planning August 7, 2006 Staff Contact Don Erickson(x6581) Consent X Subject: Public Hearing.. Preserve Our Plateau Annexation—Prezoning Correspondence.. Ordinance Resolution Old Business Exhibits: New Business Issue Paper Study Sessions Information Recommended Action: Approvals: Council concur by setting a public hearing for Legal Dept September 11, 2006, and referring the prezoning issue to Finance Dept the Planning Commission for their review before this Other hearing. Fiscal Impact: Expenditure Required... Transfer/Amendment Amount Budgeted Revenue Generated 11111000 Total Project Budget N/A City Share Total Project SUMMARY OF ACTION: The Council received a 10%Notice of Intent petition to annex on November 15, 2005, to annex approximately 1,475-acres of unincorporated King County located within Renton's East Renton Plateau Potential Annexation Area. The proponent's petition was certified on December 19, 2005, as having signatures representing at least 10%of the area's registered voters. On February 13, 2006, Council adopted a resolution calling for an election on the question of annexation to the City of Renton. This election could happen as soon as this November. Staff believes prezoning the area would send a strong message to PAA residents of Renton's sincerity in keeping this area low density single-family residential. Under state law, the City is required to hold at least two public hearings 30-days apart on future zoning. In November 2004, the site was redesignated from Residential Single Family(RSF)to Residential Low Density(RLD), as shown on the City's Comprehensive Plan Land Use Map. This designation would support a range of zones including the RC,R-1, and R-4 zones. Because of the size of this potential prezone, the Administration is urging Council to forward it to the Planning Commission for its consideration. If this were to happen, it is anticipated that the Planning Commission would meet before September 11, 2006, in order to have its recommendation back to Council before it takes up this matter. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Set September 11,2006, for a public hearing to consider future zoning for the East Renton Plateau PAA and refer it to the Planning Commission for its recommendation before the public hearing. Rentonnet/agnbill/ bh ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT, C.) NEIGHBORHOODS, AND STRATEGIC ' .� ® ' PLANNING DEPARTMENT MEMORANDUM DATE: August 1, 2006 TO: Randy Corman, Council President Members of the Renton City Council VIA: ` Kathy Keolker, Mayor FROM: Alex Pietsch, Administrator STAFF CONTACT: Don Erickson(6581) SUBJECT: Prezoning East Renton Plateau Potential Annexation Area (PAA) ISSUE: • Whether the City Council wishes to prezone the remaining portions of the East Renton Plateau PAA before an election is held on the Preserve Our Plateau Now Annexation(POPA)? • Should areas having the Residential Low Density(RLD) land use designation be zoned a combination of R-4, four units per net acre, R-1, one unit per net acre, and RC, one unit per ten acres, based upon sensitive areas analysis,probability of sewer service in the foreseeable future, and existing development character, including size of lots? RECOMMENDATION: The Administration recommends that Council: • Refer the issue of prezoning for the remaining unincorporated portions of the East Renton Plateau PAA to the Planning Commission and Planning and Development Committee. • Set September 11, 2006, for a public hearing to consider prezone zoning classifications for the remaining unincorporated portions of the East Renton Plateau PAA. "erre h:\ednsp\paa\annexations\preserve our plateau\prezoning issue paper.doc Amer Randy Corman,Council President Page 2 of 2 August 1,2006 *40 BACKGROUND SUMMARY: Prezoning is the process of establishing future zoning for unincorporated properties within a city's PAA,pursuant to RCW 35A.14.340. Prezoning will also help address much of the uncertainty about what the future entails with annexation. Use of prezoning speeds up the annexation process since the minimum two required public hearings on zoning, held at least 30-days apart, occur earlier in the process. In the case of the East Renton Plateau PAA, there is currently much uncertainty in the community as to what future zoning will be. In the 1,475 acre POPA area, the City has already taken a policy position lowering density for future development. In November 2004, Council amended its Comprehensive Plan Land Use Map, redesignating virtually all of the POPA area RLD from Residential Single Family(RSF). From potential R-8 zoning, at 8 du/net acre, this action reduced the maximum density allowed under the RLD designation to 4 du/net acre. The RLD designation also allows R-1 and Resource Conservation zoning which could even lower maximum densities further if these were applied to critical areas. These other zones might be more appropriate for some of these areas. Prezoning the remainder of the East Renton Plateau PAA will clarify this situation. Prezoning will also allow for public input on the zoning issues prior to the annexation election. Under state law, two public hearings held at least 30-days apart are required when prezoning properties in a city's unincorporated PAA. Property owners are typically notified by mail,public notice postings, and newspaper ads announcing meeting times and location. Although Renton met with residents of the POPA area in 2002-2003, and this influenced staff recommendations to change the land use designation for this area from RS to RLD, we have not heard from residents and property owners on recommendations for specific zoning designations in the area. The City is forming a Task Force of unincorporated area residents to review community planning issues, including zoning for this area. A detailed zoning recommendation will be developed by staff for review by the Task Force and Planning Commission prior to making a recommendation to the Planning and Development Committee. This recommendation will evaluate mapping alternatives for RC,R-1, and R-4 zoning. CONCLUSION: Prezoning the remainder of the Renton's East Renton Plateau PAA before the POPA fall election on annexing approximately 1,475 acres of it into the City would appear to be in the public's best interest. First of all, it would give interested residents a better understanding of the City legislative process. Second,prezoning should reduce resident and voter apprehension about future land use and zoning issues affecting the area, and third, it shows residents that the City is following through in reducing residential densities in the area, as it indicated it would,back in 2004. h:\ednsp\paa\annexations\preserve our plateau\prezoning issue paper.doc CITY OF RENTON COUNCIL AGENDA BILL AI#: . itiatioe Submitting Data: For Agenda of: August 7, 2006 Dept/Div/Board.. EDNSP Staff Contact Alex Pietsch x6592 Agenda Status Consent X Subject: Public Hearing.. Ordinance to add budget authority to make contract Correspondence.. payments under the$300,000 HUD BEDI Grant#B-02- Ordinance SP-WA-0758 accepted by Council on February 7, 2005. Resolution Old Business Exhibits: New Business Ordinance Study Sessions Information Recommended Action: Approvals: Council concur Legal Dept X Finance Dept X Other Fiscal Impact: Expenditure Required... $300,000 Transfer/Amendment Amount Budgeted 0 Revenue Generated $300,000 Total Project Budget $300,000 City Share Total Project0 SUMMARY OF ACTION: The City was awarded$300,000 through a HUD BEDI Grant,which Council accepted on February 7, 2005. Council authorized a contract CAG#05-127 with HDR for$50,000 to prepare an Access Study and CAG#05-097 with WSDOT for$250,000 on June 6, 2005 to develop a right-of-way plan for expanding the I-405/NE 44th Street freeway interchange. This ordinance grants budget authority to process payments from the grant under these contracts. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Approve the ordinance to amend the budget to reflect these amounts. H:\EDNSP\Council\Issue Papers-Agenda Bills-Ctte Reports\2006\Ordinance to Amend Budget for HUD Grant and Expenditures.doc CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON ORDINANCE NO. AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON, AMENDING THE 2006 BUDGET BY CREATING A REVENUE ACCOUNT FOR RECEIPT OF FUNDS FROM THE HUD BEDI GRANT #B-02-SP-WA-0758 IN THE AMOUNT OF $300,000 GRANTED TO THE CITY ON JUNE 16, 2004M, TO REIMBURSE EXPENSES UNDER CAG#05-127 WITH HDR ENGINEERING FOR $50,000 AND CAG#05-097 WITH WSDOT, PROJECT CGA431OR FOR $250,000, AND DECLARING AN EMERGENCY. NOW, 'THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON, DOES ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS: SECTION L Appropriation in the General Governmental Fund is hereby increased as follows: Funds 2006 Budget 2006 Adjusted Original Increase Budget ir+ Budget R000.000000.023.3310.0014.20.000000 0 $300,000 $300,000 E000.000000.023.5580.0080.41.000000 0 $50,000 $50,000 E000.000000.023.5580.0080.52.000000 0 $250,000 $250,000 Source of funds: HUD BEDI GRANT#B-02-SP-WA-0758 SECTION H. Incoming Revenue and contract expenditures are hereby added to the 2006 budget. SECTION III. An emergency is hereby declared and this ordinance shall become effective immediately upon its passage and approval. PASSED BY THE CITY COUNCIL this day of , 2006. Bonnie I. Walton, City Clerk 1 ORDINANCE NO. APPROVED BY THE MAYOR this day of , 2006. Kathy Keolker, Mayor Approved as to form: Lawrence J. Warren, City Attorney Date of Publication: ORD.1274:7/21/06:ma 2 CITY OF RENTON COUNCIL AGENDA BILL . Baia: '+ n41 iootwoil Submitting Data: For Agenda of: Dept/Div/Board.. EDNSP/Strategic Planning August 7, 2006 Staff Contact Don Erickson (x6581) Agenda Status X Consent X Subject: Public Hearing.. Leitch Annexation - 60% Direct Petition to Annex Correspondence.. Ordinance Resolution Old Business Exhibits: New Business Issue Paper Study Sessions 60% Direct Petition Information King County Certification Document Recommended Action: Approvals: Council concur in setting a public hearing for August Legal Dept 21, 2006. Finance Dept Other Fiscal Impact: Expenditure Required... Transfer/Amendment Amount Budgeted Revenue Generated Total Project Budget N/A City Share Total Project.. SUMMARY OF ACTION: The Council received a 60% Direct Petition on May 15, 2006, to annex approximately 14.59- acres of unincorporated King County located within Renton's Potential Annexation Area. The proponent's petition was certified on May 25, 2006, as having signatures representing at least 60% of the area's assessed value. Under state law, if the Council decides to accept the 60% Direct Petition, it is required to hold at least two public hearings 30-days apart on future zoning. The site is currently designated Residential Low Density (RLD) as shown on the Comprehensive Plan Land Use Map. This area would most likely be zoned R-4, four units per net acre, if annexed into the City. The Administration is also seeking authorization to forward the Notice of Intent Package to the Boundary Review Board if Council decides to accept the 60% Direct Petition. The City, at that time, may decide whether to invoke the Board's jurisdiction and request expansion of the proposed annexation's boundary. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Set August 21, 2006, for a public hearing to decide whether to accept the 60% Direct Petition to annex and forward the Notice of Intent Package to the Boundary Review Board. This hearing would also consider future zoning for the Leitch Annexations Rentonnet/agnbill/ bh �y O ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT, �,.. +6% ® ± NEIGHBORHOODS, AND STRATEGIC PLANNING DEPARTMENT MEMORANDUM DATE: July 18, 2006 TO: Randy Corman, Council President Members of the Renton City Council VIA: !' Kathy Keolker, Mayor FROM: Alex Pietsch, Administrator t. E � v STAFF CONTACT: Don Erickson(6581) SUBJECT: Leitch Annexation - Consideration of 60% Direct Petition to Annex and Possible Future Zoning ISSUE: • Whether the City Council wants to accept the 60% Direct Petition to Annex for the Leitch Annexation now that the petition has been certified as sufficient by the King County Department of Assessments? • If Council decides to accept the 60% Direct Petition to Annex, whether future zoning should be R-4, consistent with the current Comprehensive Plan land use designation? • If Council decides to accept the 60% Direct Petition to Annex, whether it wishes to authorize the Administration to forward the Notice of Intent package to the Boundary Review Board (BRB)? • Whether the City should invoke jurisdiction during the BRB's 45-day review period, in order to expand the annexation's boundaries to include other contiguous properties, in order to create a more coherent interim city boundary and service area? RECOMMENDATION: The Administration recommends that Council: • Accept the 60% Direct Petition to Annex for the 14.59-acre Leitch Annexation site. • Support R-4 zoning on the non-street portions of this annexation consistent with the 'ek'•"" Comprehensive Plan Residential Low Density (RLD) land use designation. h:\ednsp\paa\annexations\leitch\60%issue paper.doc Randy Corman,Council President Page 2 of 3 July 18,2006 • Authorize it to forward the Notice of Intent package for the Leitch Annexation to the BRB for King County with the idea of invoking the Board's jurisdiction to consider more rational boundaries and service areas. BACKGROUND SUMMARY: At its October 10, 2005, public meeting, Council decided to accept the 10% Notice of Intent to Commence Annexation petition and authorized circulation of a 60% direct petition to annex. Council at that time specified that petitioners agree to support future zoning consistent with the Comprehensive Plan land use designation and assume their proportionate share of the City's outstanding indebtedness upon annexation to the City. Except for parks, reviewing staff identified no major issues. Because of potential downhill flooding and erosion, future development should be required to mitigate potential impacts to surface water. The 60% Direct Petition to Annex was submitted on May 15, 2006, and certified by the King County Department of Assessments as having signatures representing at least 60% of the area's assessed valuation on May 25, 2006. Council is now being asked to decide whether it wishes to accept the 60% Direct Petition to Annex and forward it on to the BRB. If it decides to accept the 60% Direct Petition, it also needs to consider future zoning for the site assuming the BRB also supports it. The Comprehensive Plan Land Use Map designation for the subject site is RLD. The RLD designation allows R-1 and R-4 zoning, the latter at four units per net acre. King County currently has R-4 zoning on the annexation site. The County R-4 zone allows 4 units per gross acre, and with bonuses, allows up to 6 units per gross acre. The latter would allow almost double what Renton's R-4 zone would allow, up to 87 units versus a maximum of 47 units. A more detailed discussion of this proposed annexation and review comments was contained in the department's September 14, 2005, 10% Notice of Intent petition issue paper. CONCLUSION: The proposed Leitch Annexation has been certified as having signatures representing at least 60% of the area's assessed value. It also has reasonable boundaries and appears to comply with relevant BRB objectives. Reviewing staff raised no significant objections to this annexation. There is a general deficiency in the area of parks and a one-time estimated parks acquisition and improvement cost of$22,811 would be necessary to bring the annexation site up to current City standards. This is based upon an estimated future population of 106 residents, living in 47 dwelling units, at build out. Staff estimates a slight surplus to the City of approximately $12,392 per year, at build out, in today's dollars. h:\ednsp\paa\annexations\leitch\60%issue paper.doc Randy Corman,Council President Page 3 of 3 July 18,2006 Based upon the above and the previously submitted analysis in the 10% Notice of Intent issue paper, staff concludes that the proposed Leitch Annexation with R-4 zoning, would be consistent with Renton's Comprehensive Plan, and be in the general welfare and interest of the City. Although figures have not been run, it is also anticipated that this annexation would generate a positive cash flow, albeit lesser, to the City if it is expanded by the BRB. slaw h:\ednsp\paa\annexations\leitch\60%issue paper.doc /9-0.5:00Y - PETITION TO ANNEX TO THE CITY OF RENTON UNDER RCW 35A.14.120 Applicant:NW t (60% Petition—Leitch Annexation) Address:19 2)7 S E j TO: THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RENTON ft Entray u 9 605-y 1055 South Grady Way Renton, WA 98055 Telephone No.g25-ng-?ot3 The undersigned are owners of not less than sixty percent(60%) in value according to t 'n`Oi~REN1ON assessed valuation for general taxation,of real property located contiguous to the City of Renton. We hereby petition that such property be annexed to the City of Renton under the provisi,'Afl 5 2006 RCW 35A.14.120 et seq. RECEIVED The territory proposed to be annexed is within King County, Washington,and is contiguous to RK'S OFFICE the City of Renton. A map(Exhibit 1)and legal description(Exhibit 2) are included as part of this petition. In response to a duly filed and considered "Notice of Intention"to commence annexation proceedings,the City Council of the City of Renton met with the initiating parties under RCW 35A.14.120 on October10, 2005. The City Council then determined that the City would accept the 10%Notice of Intention petition and authorize circulation of this petition. Further, pursuant to RCW 35A.14.120, the undersigned petitioners agree to: (1) Accept the City's simultaneous adoption of zoning regulations consistent with the Comprehensive Plan's land use designations for the subject property;and, ,t ow (2) Assume their proportional share of the City's pre-existing bonded indebtedness(approximately 8 cents per each$1,000 of assessed value). all as noted in the minutes of the Council meeting and contained in the electronic recording of such meeting. WHEREFORE, the undersigned property owners petition the City Council and ask: (a) That the City Council fix a date for a public hearing about such proposed annexation, cause a notice to be published and posted, specifying the time and place of such hearing, and inviting all persons who are interested to appear at the hearing and state their approval or disapproval of such annexation or to ask questions; and (b) That following such hearing, and consistent with any approval by the Boundary Review Board, the City Council by ordinance annex the above described territory to become part of the City of Renton, Washington, subject to its laws and ordinances then and thereafter in force, and to receive City public services. This two page form is one of a number of identical forms which comprise one petition seeking the annexation of the described territory to the City of Renton, Washington as above stated, and may be filed with other pages containing additional signatures. Page 1 of 2 Leitch Annexation 60%Direct Petition to Annex lr WARNING: Every person who signs this petition with any other than his or her true name, or who knowingly signs more than one of these petitions, or signs a petition seeking an election when he or she is not a legal voter, or signs a petition when he or she is otherwise not qualified to sign, or who 'lowmakes herein any false statement,shall be guilty of a misdemeanor. The undersigned have read the above petition and consent to the filing of this petition. (Names of petitioners should be in identical form as the same that appear on record in the chain of tide to the real estate) ,v r _ 1. °L ti 14 !► 112 1 7 5 13' Sty 13 'l hA, 4-I oi RaVioA J)WA 2. , Mi,l& ` • , - ! ` / / 4f9335'Et3bt� 1~'t, OinaS MAO P(4101\4 \4)19 3. )9-'25 .QE` 130-11 Si; &tII tic/4/9H/ - EY ' k 1 2 2t 1 4. ..1()b 1_ !s f).t ., t i )9 ac 10- 9), ! 52301.216 DE-613)r 6)RIMS ,fialiNviltii9 Nialie 5. y 2 ,6 - -/P1/-114/e7- )if)i 3 SC 130/'` Sf, 1Sz 0°,510 b 6. i. 2LF 1&t PL S " k Haik R N JJ ) 14.41 7. kJ. I 6 oi u pip/+- iMG-1 Se )36th Sty - oo I5 051 I ,, ; / -% i,,i, x JE. 76hi WF 8. tit 1 1� '� St, /52:x(- (11 7C:. A7 ki kk ki �E MAI) 1414 4 _ , a SE icz30.91T21 9' 1 I tg . RE-0 6'hi 1 w V) i 10. Li 2- O6 «b,Li9 -ND thpi 1503c5-1693 / Tim i'")iCt to figiG A)? W19 Page 2 of 2 411111111 EXHIBIT 1 , \_---- , ---- -r y-1 '. , Wil 112- - ' . - ------- ' - - -----___v- ,----- _ - ,- _-- --- . CD "• -...„..1___ '\.- ' COC' A"'--_-_„...„--A/7,—, .,=--- F.-i'":9- '.''N, ( ' -...--.. C . ,• '' T . -"— __--- - •..,, , \ -,-.' ,%:)--.___:::.:.-;› ,,u,., . , . ,,, , s c.7._)j Alt 4VV' ..- 4''C‘ ?).. ---- ., ;,— ----. -- s ‘ < I _ / ' ,"" - ' - . . ,..,,, , --.. , H— 1 \ _... ;_ - - ) : / . -74414 Lillikti , "'N, : .,.. - - -- ,4-,-,\I ... .----- -v ", 1 r---' ,,. I__i , ,.. „, ,,. .r.7,- , F- __ _ _ „ ., . ,, E 1 , ,,,,60 ',. ' ------. -' ‘ 1 • -.e... ''er. ' S ( ' t / St .--.... ,:, . -------_, _..,,,w?::::,.., .,,,,,.- ..., . . ,,,,,:-, ,-..-.-,.: ,„-„,..,,,,:,-....m---,,0.5,,,,:,,,!..„,,,,,,„ ::: ,,;,,- - ,,,,,, , .._ ... ,.. ': .,l_i4zrip-,,s:„1 7.1::7„;,4--.f:-..-_.:-, r: ,!-,n, x ,i'. .-, -'::-:-.:7-.. „:*-r.:-..kg.,,-7 -.-,-,-,,, ,k,f-,-- --„,., ,,,::---,r.f.:,-,-, .!;;:,‘ :‘,,:.,,,,,,t,,„\,---„_. e..._, ,_ ',,r.,:::,: ,...i.,.4,,,,,,,',,,,.:;.•--'.e-7 ;.--.•,ii '-i J., :--;,-';'-r:[ 141 :- ..-----; s1liqpegl .4.,,K,. .:4144, ,..., ,. ,-------..., _/ ‘ ''''‘''''''''''4`,02::' \-..' .., la i'IrS-':i;r-e-- ,_,--:,-,T,-, •-,.::--,:-,..liki%ti-it.:!-.:-, - -4,.;;.!:-=.4-1,-.75.-,-°:-:,i'-`rii::'''_'-'''::,-;i="-'4:•-!MI ,'i6',\;,,s,\r,','•; ‘;',7,MT .' ' •,-. -'r"-'';'C:'Li':';-;.---04V _r --;',=4-rf"--4.rt-,ei•--tr-.24-,'it-44 ,-::-;eN-.',..:'it:',.',-:-.; '-:,':-.',..-'.'-'ffr'.. i':',:ri-, \-r-___,-----\ , 10 11• .7146, :1.2,..,,,,-,,.-..!i,,TO7.,-`,4-yY;.--,,•rp..'Emma1. -..-„. ___ - 44\ 7 „ ,t , 5- 41 . , 4`;;;A;;‘,0A1,i,,,,,,„; -'' --,, .",-,‘,.'f- -,..-_----r.--.-.:'', ,,',i,i._:,-,:.-.,,,,3.,-;;;;;.,„ir.c,-:::::,..tifitt-,•:.4,::::% ,ik:,.:r.::7 :,1 ,_.:..'T-,ti II .,-- . ill'',,''' '':-'-'..:,'r.;;•`1; ''''' 1 , / ' \. ri/40140V;1 - '',,,, !,.:,:. ,,z*,-.'1,,,,,,T.-„,/,-,,,,X,'„-'' ,!i,,4,!.-;,,A,,,,',,,V.,, , • ,,I'1'44 ,i.fj x----,,X,',,s''''''- - L.:,-ir.k,,,,,,,,(A, .1.4z,k,-,--. '-,-,:i L ..“6. 110.13 ,__ ,_, -1 ''''''''''""' N. } , --' ' .'' . -,---Y----",-* , . ,4' - I,'Il.0•1'..; is, . 11,41,111iq ,.. ,--, ,,,gg;-,, ,,,....,,,..„W ,,,g,/,.041,1,1,,,,m, '0, 44,'A01,14:1:1;i:IPIti, N ; — lig'044ij0T,Ii.'111 .,,11:1,:,,: ,,. .4.‘,It'" „., '--, x , -----: „. 115,5 , ' ' -'.:.•:'\,•.;;: 'l'IJ,i'1 l' _, ,A' -o iW/''/J76',Ph II i 1,•A", _0° "41111 __. , ,,.. , -____, 0%,;;Z%;;',,:`',:gir'' ,-,s=-5-;=;":=:=.,==s;,---'-7---=1=F.1--1----F---Y-77,,--_,--ii_-7,-Ar=40.,:,:"?.....4...:_-_-,,7,...1 et;;,_..,,.„,.• 4.' 'S k\ ,,ir-„,_-7,-._z-,:x_,,,:y.,-Z-'7::,-,--..-_,,,,_ _:,CS-: -1-'..--'?:--,--'''5.::'_.,5,--1"";?--3--:li"---!-_-:1/..-7--,.7-.•--''0--'','",.,--',--.:&.;---7----.:5%,..'-,-----.-...-,.--,---- -,,,,•-, ,-.,,--,--,,,'.,• ( —- 1 -1 I I- i------- -I i _..- „.., ,—-, 1 -..... --. .• ''.. Ix. ‘1.. ,..--.,,-..-.-.e...,5.,...%,..-, ..,"..,".'....- /"..6 ‘,vl•. \.11p ,I / , ---.. .”Oil I , . x '10.5", ----Th ...,.. .........•=Me I . \ ' ,..--Ns( i,_______ 1. - .: 11, This document is a graphic representation,not guaranteed to survey accuracy,intended for oty purposes only ond 'i o hosed on the best information avoilable on of the dote shown. •_. / .' This mop is for display purposes only. --__ 3 iii .....sia _____ A e-st----- -- L . 5 , •_, Proposed Leitch Annexation 0 300 600 Figure 2: Topography Map im Interval Countour 1 : 3600 j 0 Economic Development,Neighborhoods&Strategic Planning Renton City Limits c.) e, — Alex Pietsch,Administrator WR • .'''-.--'"z,q,i Proposed Annexation Area G.Del Rosario 1.' N-10 28 November 2005 EXHIBIT 2 LEITCH ANNEXATION LEGAL DESCRIPTION The north one half(1/2)of the northwest quarter of the southeast quarter of Section 15, Section 23 North, Range S East, W.M., in King County, Washington lying westerly of the westerly line of the plat of Beach Home Estates No.1, as recorded in Volume 75 of Plats, Page 55, records of King County, Washington; TOGETHER WITH that portion of 143rd Ave SE and SE 138th Street, as dedicated in said plat for road purposes, lying southerly of the north line of Lot 1 in said plat extended westerly across said 143rd Ave SE to said west line of said plat;EXCEPT the east three-quarters of the north 30 feet of the northwest quarter of the northwest quarter of said southeast quarter for roads (SE 2"d Place); TOGETHER WITH that portion of 140th Ave NE described as follows: That portion of the west 42 feet of the southwest quarter of the northeast quarter of said Section 15,lying southerly of the existing City Limits of Renton, as annexed by Ordinance No. 5074, and that portion of the east 30 feet of the southeast quarter of the northwest quarter of said Section 15,lying southerly of the existing City Limits of Renton, as annexed by Ordinance No. 5074. *40r King County Department of Assessments Scott Noble ` King County Administration Bldg. Assessor 500 Fourth Avenue,Room 708 Seattle,WA 981042384 (206)296-5195 FAX(206)296-0595 Email:assessor.info@metrokc.gov www.metrokc.gov/assessor/ ANNEXATION PETITION CERTIFICATION THIS IS TO CERTIFY that the petition submitted May 23, 2006 to the King County Department of Assessments by Don Erickson, Senior Planner for the City of Renton, supporting the annexation to Renton of the properties described as the Lietch Annexation, has been examined, the property taxpayers, tax parcel numbers, and assessed value of properties listed thereon carefully compared with the King County tax roll records, and as a result of such examination, found to be sufficient under the provisions of the Revised Code of Nod Washington, Section 35A.01.040. The Department of Assessments has not verified that the signature on the petition is valid through comparison with any record of actual signatures, nor that the signature was obtained or submitted in an appropriate time frame, and this document does not certify such to be the case. Dated this 25th day of May, 2006 00.0S6i Scott Noble, Kin County Assessor •®/202M • CER ' NEWCASTLE kND 1 LA K.i U:)R EN I 1 Merritt II (Phase II) Perkins 52.7 ac. , � 15.6 ac. Aster Park INGTON ,_. I __ a_rj18.5 ac. I i Ip� O , ! I z �.. .� �, �.���`.--__.__� Querin a 24.0 ac. a_..—.... .,>'.. Leitch - AKE KAT 16.2 ac. Preserve Our Plateau Akers Maplewood 1474.5 ac. Lass 1„r Farms Addition f 13.9 ac. 60.5 ac. z Hudson „qr.. j 14.6 ac. - 2;° ems...«.. �. _... SIE Af ;1 c: d l r."-_-� a:.- _ _ -�� City of Renton I 1 N 1Current Annexations -`rt "' -, { URBAN OROK'TII BOUNDARY 1.--* --T " A n t h o n e r �3 -....w...,.. CITY LIMITS 3 25.7 ac. e ACTIVE ANNEXATION t a'� hcononic Development Negbborbooes&Slrateyc Planing I ,..1./1 Adme n yrn �, '�' G Dei Rosana i \I7 Joy 2007 CITY OF RENTON COUNCIL AGENDA BILL AI#: re Submitting Data: For Agenda of 8/7/2006 Dept/Div/Board.. Hearing Examiner Staff Contact Fred J. Kaufman, ext. 6515 Agenda Status Consent X Subject: Public Hearing.. Correspondence.. Shy Creek Preliminary Plat Ordinance File No. LUA-06-009, ECF, PP Resolution Old Business Exhibits: New Business Hearing Examiner's Report and Recommendation Study Sessions Legal Description and Vicinity Map Information Recommended Action: Approvals: Legal Dept Council Concur Finance Dept Other Fiscal Impact: Expenditure Required... N/A Transfer/Amendment Amount Budgeted Revenue Generated 141101 Total Project Budget City Share Total Project SUMMARY OF ACTION: The hearing was held on May 23, 2006. The Hearing Examiner's Report and Recommendation on the Shy Creek Preliminary Plat was published on June 27, 2006. The appeal period ended on July 11,2006. The Examiner recommends approval of the proposed preliminary plat subject to the conditions outlined on pages 9 and 10 of the Examiner's Report and Recommendation. Conditions placed on this project are to be met at later stages of the platting process. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Approve the Shy Creek Preliminary Plat with conditions as outlined in the Examiner's Report and Recommendation. Rentonnet/agnbill/ bh June 27, 2006 Nome OFFICE OF THE HEARING EXAMINER CITY OF RENTON Minutes APPLICANT: John Skochdopole Conner Homes Company 846-108t Avenue NE Bellevue, WA 98004 PROJECT NAME; Shy Creek Preliminary Plat File No.: LUA 06-009,PP, ECF LOCATION: Between SE 2nd Place and NE 2nd Street and between Jericho and Hoquiam Ayes. NE SUMMARY OF REQUEST: Approval for a 61-lot 7-tract subdivision of a 16.1-acre site intended for the development of single-family detached residences. SUMMARY OF ACTION: Development Services Recommendation: Approve subject to conditions DEVELOPMENT SERVICES REPORT: The Development Services Report was received by the Examiner on May 16, 2006. PUBLIC HEARING: After reviewing the Development Services Report,examining available information on file with the application, field checking the property and surrounding area; the Examiner conducted a public hearing on the subject as follows: MINUTES The following minutes are a summary of the May 23, 2006 hearing. The legal record is recorded on CD. The hearing opened on Tuesday, May 23, 2006, at approximately 9:00 a.m. in the Council Chambers on the seventh floor of the Renton City Hall. Parties wishing to testify were affirmed by the Examiner. The following exhibits were entered into the record: Exhibit No. 1: Yellow file containing the Exhibit No. 2: Preliminary Plat Plan original application,proof of posting,proof of publication and other documentation pertinent to this project. Shy Creek Preliminary Plat File No.: LUA-06-009 PP, ECF June 27,2006 Page 2 Exhibit No.3: Preliminary Grading Plan Exhibit No.4: Preliminary Drainage and Utility Plan Exhibit No. 5: Tree Cutting/Land Clearing Exhibit No. 6: Conceptual Landscape Plan Plan Exhibit No.7: Neighborhood Detail Map Exhibit No.8: Zoning Map Exhibit No. 9: ERC Mitigation Measures Exhibit No. 10: Letter from the Watershed Company dated 4/27/2006. Exhibit No. 11: Revised Preliminary Plat Exhibit No. 12: Stream Enhancement Plan Exhibit No. 13: Illustrative Drawing of Entrance Area The hearing opened with a presentation of the staff report by Jill Ding, Associate Planner, Development Services, City of Renton, 1055 S Grady Way,Renton,Washington 98055. The site is located south of NE 2nd Street,north of SE 2nd Street,east of Hoquiam Avenue NE and west of Jericho Avenue NE. The property is zoned R-4 and the Comprehensive Plan is Residential Low Density. The site is approximately 16 acres. The original plat map was revised,the original entrance off of Jericho Avenue NE on the east side of the property was aligned with the school driveway across the street. The ERC stated that this proposed entrance to the new plat would create additional impacts to the wetland,wetland buffer, the on-site stream and the stream buffer and so the entrance was relocated to the north of the original entrance and is now outside of the wetland and buffer area. There are two single-family residences and associated outbuildings on the site,they are proposed to be removed and 61 new detached single-family residences will be built. A Class 4 stream crosses the property from east to west and then south. There are four Category 3 wetlands that have been identified on the property. The Class 4 stream requires a 35-foot buffer,the applicant requested to reduce the buffer to 25- feet and the request was granted by the Development Services Director. Category 3 wetlands require a 25-foot buffer, if the wetland area is less than 2200 square feet in area and is an isolated wetland, it would not be regulated by the City's critical area regulations. Wetland A is located on the east side of the site and is connected to the Class 4 stream and is a regulated wetland. Wetland B is 1,912 square feet and located in the southeast portion of the property. Wetland C is 1,405 square feet and located on the north end of the property. Wetland D is 739 square feet and is located just south of Wetland C in the northern section of the property. The Environmental Review Committee issued a Determination of Non-Significance—Mitigated (DNS-M), which included 7 mitigation measures. No appeals were filed. An addendum to the Shy Creek Preliminary Plat File No.: LUA-06-009 PP, ECF June 27, 2006 Page 3 DNS-M was issued on May 17, 2006,which discloses the three additional wetlands on the subject property. No appeal period is required for an addendum. The proposed plan is consistent with the Residential Low Density Land Use Element, Community Design Element and Environmental Element of the Comprehensive Plan Designation. The proposed plan results in a net density of 4.57 du/ac which complies with the density requirements for the R-4 zoning designation. All lots appear to be in compliance with the minimum required lot width, depth and size standards as prescribed in the R-4 zone. The proposed lots appear to contain adequate area to meet the setback requirements. All setbacks will be verified prior to issuing individual building permits. The building height is limited to two stories and 30-feet. The two existing residences are proposed to be removed from the subject site. The demolition permits and all inspections must be completed prior to final plat approval. A tree cutting and land-clearing plan was submitted,within the plan it was proposed to retain 72 trees based on the City's requirements. There were 600 trees on site, 323 are considered protected trees per the City's clearing regulations. The Development Services Director signed a determination that 25%of significant trees should be retained or replaced on site. Of the 323 protected trees the applicant would be required to retain or replace 81 trees, with 72 retained,it is also proposed to plant 110 street trees,giving them a total of 182 trees that are retained or replaced. The minimum amount of landscaping required along all public rights-of-way is five feet and must consist of draught tolerant vegetation or irrigated. Two trees 1-1/2 inches for deciduous or six to eight feet in height for conifer within the front area of each lot. The applicant would be required to provide an additional 5-foot planting strip along the proposed right-of-way frontage of the new looped road system within the plat. A detailed landscape plan is required for review and approval prior to issuing building permits. The proposed lots appear to have sufficient building area for the development of detached single- family homes. All corner lots at intersections of dedicated public rights-of-way would have a minimum radius of 15 feet. A stream enhancement plan was presented and the plantings being proposed are very dense. Access to the site is proposed via a new internal access road off of NE 2nd Street,Jericho Avenue NE, and Hoquiam Avenue NE. Full street improvements would be required along the frontages of NE 2°d, SE 2"d, Jericho, Hoquiam and the proposed looped road. There are assorted easements within the plat that will be used to access various private lots. A homeowner's association or maintenance agreement for the development will be required for any common improvements and/or tracts within the plat. • Shy Creek Preliminary Plat File No.: LUA-06-009 PP, ECF June 27, 2006 Page 4 Traffic,Fire and Parks Mitigation Fees have been imposed on the project. The site is located within the Renton School District and it has been noted that they would be able to handle the approximately 26 new students. An outside consultant did review the stream mitigation plan,there were some revisions requested regarding the selection and installation of plants. A revised mitigation plan was required to be submitted at the time of utility construction application for review and approval by Development Services project manager. To reduce the impacts in the area of the eastern stream crossing due to impacts to the stream, wetland and associated buffer areas the applicant will install a bottomless box culvert with footings located outside of the stream channel. As a result of this, Wetland A would still be impacted, these impacts could be mitigated elsewhere on site possibly within Tract C. A Native Growth Protection Easement is required for Tracts B, C and F. A Preliminary Technical Information Report was submitted,the proposed method of drainage control would be via a wetpond located on the southwestern corner of the plat within Tract G. The pond is in compliance with the 2005 King County Surface Water Design Manual and will release water per Level 2 Flow Control Standard. The project area is located outside the City of Renton water service area and will have to comply with the Water District 90 requirements. The project is located within the City of Renton sewer area,there are no existing sewer mains located adjacent to this site. The sewer main will be extended along the full boundaries of the plat. There is a section missing from the plans submitted,therefore a section from the northernmost terminus of the sewer main along Jericho Avenue NE will need to be extended to the northernmost boundary of the plat. A lift station will be required to service portions of the plat. The preliminary location of the lift station has not been approved. Prior to recording the plat, any existing septic systems must be abandoned. John Skochdopole,Connor Homes Company, 846-108th Avenue NE, Bellevue,WA 98004 stated that he is the project manager at Connor Homes. He clarified that the access easement drawn across the front of Lot 8 and connects to Jericho is just an error, it provides access to Lot 8 only. They do have a Water Availability Certificate from Water District 90. There was never any intention to have access from Jericho, 2nd Avenue SE or NE 2nd Avenue. Primary access for Lots 54 through 61 and Lot 53 will come straight off Hoquiam Avenue. They would like some clarifications on some of the staff recommendations: The request to have the sewer lines taken to the northernmost edge of the property line, is that to the end of Lot 34 or all the way to 2"d Street. Shy Creek Preliminary Plat File No.: LUA-06-009 PP, ECF June 27,2006 Page 5 For the pond fence,they would like to do cyclone fencing especially with the extensive landscaping that is going into that area. If it is visible, it is more likely to be maintained, when the area is closed off,and no one can see it,it is likely to be forgotten about by Homeowners' Associations. The entry included in the revised preliminary plat shows a curved linear road, which requires a slight deviation from code. The code states that a piece of straight street between two curved portions of street, as drawn this does not comply with that code. They are trying to follow the curve of the creek to enhance the entrance and make it interesting. The entrance has extra width in the roadway over the 42-foot requirement, they would like to install an island in the center. The road would not be 20-feet wide on either side of the island,but the other accesses to the development would meet the fire requirement of a 20-foot roadway. If need be,the island could go away. The new R-4 code regarding the five-foot landscaping on the frontage of all lots abutting a private right-of-way, they have proposed a five-foot boundary landscape strip completely around the plat. Those areas have space behind the sidewalk and should be landscaped. However,the code suggests that grass cannot be put in the front five feet of a traditional single-family lot, and if he does, it must be irrigated,which could upset potential homeowners. The Examiner stated that that is code and would have to be taken up with City Council. Kayren Kittrick,Development Services Division stated that the Fire Department would be against any island in Road A or anything that would not give them the full 20-foot access required for their rigs. She did state that they would work with the parties and try to come to some compatible design that would be agreeable to the various parties. Sewer extension,by code says it must go to the northernmost boundary, which would be Lot 34. She is not sure why it has been requested to go all the way to Jericho, if that is a requirement latecomer will be left open. There is a need for the pond area to be landscaped and fenced, whether it is a cyclone or cedar fence, the area must be landscaped. The visibility is great because the homeowners remember to maintain the area. She saw one where the cyclone fence was on the interior while the cedar fencing was only along the public street. There will be no access to SE 2nd Street with a road between Lots 9 and 10. Jill Ding stated they were aware of the concerns in regards to the five-foot landscaping requirements along the frontage of the looped access road. It is a code requirement. Occasionally staff and council do meet to make adjustments to some conditions of the code. The applicant is always free to address the Mayor or City Council with some requests as to why it is not working or with some suggestions on how it could work better. The Examiner called for further testimony regarding this project. There was no one else wishing to speak, and no further comments from staff. The hearing closed at approximately 10:23 am. Shy Creek Preliminary Plat File No.: LUA-06-009 PP, ECF June 27,2006 Page 6 FINDINGS,CONCLUSIONS & RECOMMENDATION Having reviewed the record in this matter, the Examiner now makes and enters the following: FINDINGS: 1. The applicant,John Skochdopole, Conner Homes, filed a request for a Preliminary Plat approval. 2. The yellow file containing the staff report,the State Environmental Policy Act(SEPA) documentation and other pertinent materials was entered into the record as Exhibit#1. 3. The Environmental Review Committee(ERC),the City's responsible official issued a Determination of Non-Significance-Mitigated(DNS-M). 4. The subject proposal was reviewed by all departments with an interest in the matter. 5. The subject site is located between SE 2nd Place and NE 2nd Street on the south and north,respectively, and between Jericho and Hoquiam Avenues on the east and west, respectively. 6. The map element of the Comprehensive Plan designates the area in which the subject site is located as suitable for the development of low density single family uses,but does not mandate such development without consideration of other policies of the Plan. 7. The subject site is currently zoned R-4(Single Family-4 dwelling units/acre). The subject site was part of what is known as the "Mosier II Annexation." Section 4-2- 110D.13 permitted development of five(5)dwelling units per acre and relaxed dimensional standards including 7,200 square foot lot size, 60 foot wide for interior lots and 70 feet for corner lots, 70 foot lot depth, 15 foot street side yard or 5 feet interior side yard. 8. The subject site was annexed to the City with the adoption of Ordinance 5171 enacted in January 2006. 9. The subject site is approximately 16.1 acres or 703,058 square feet. The site is generally rectangular although third party property intrudes into what would be the northeast corner of the rectangle. The subject site is approximately 600.59 feet wide(east to west)by approximately 1,315.39 feet long. 10. The subject site slopes downward toward the west at between a 10 and 20 percent grade. There is also a slight dip in the center of the subject site where a small Class 4 creek runs east to west through the site. The stream would require a 35-foot buffer under code. The applicant proposes enhancing the creek, which would allow a buffer reduction to 25 feet. Four Category 3 wetlands are located on the subject site. It was found that three of them were below the minimum size of 2,200 square feet and are normally exempt from the Critical Areas regulations. Wetland A is 3,759 square feet and would require a 25-foot Shy Creek Preliminary Plat File No.: LUA-06-009 PP, ECF June 27,2006 Page 7 buffer. Staff determined that Wetland B, at 1,912 square feet, fell just below threshold and recommended that impacts to it be mitigated. It is still a natural area. Wetland C is 1,405 square feet and Wetland D is 739 square feet. 11. In addition to the mitigations or buffers noted above, the ERC and staff required the proposed east entrance to be relocated and redesigned to protect and preserve Wetland A and to provide a more natural creek bed and stream crossing near the proposed entrance. 12. The subject site has a variety of vegetation that includes 631 trees. The tree survey determined that 323 trees meet the criteria to be "protected trees." The applicant has proposed maintaining 72 of those trees and planting an additional 110 trees. The Director determined that this proposal met the City's requirements that 25% of trees be maintained or replaced with reasonably sized, 2 inch caliper trees. Trees in natural protected areas will be included in a Native Growth Protection easement. 13. In order to develop building pads,roads and utilities the applicant proposes approximately 52,872 cubic yards of cut and approximately 35,104 cubic yards of fill. 14. The applicant proposes dividing the subject site into 61 single-family lots as well as 7 tracts. The seven tracts would be used to protect sensitive areas, provide recreation or provide for stormwater detention. Tracts A to F run from east to west in the central area of the property and contain either the stream or areas on either side of the stream. Tract `err` G would be located in the southwest corner of the plat and contain the storm drainage pond/system. 15. The 61 lots would support detached single-family lots arrayed around an internal looped public road. There would be one tier of lots located along the eastern property line, Jericho. These lots would be "single tier" lots with a rear yard along a street. The interior block would be two lots wide. The western lots would generally be in a two-tier arrangement. There would be some interior lots,Lots 7 to 12, 14 and 34 and 35. They would be accessed by easements in the northeast, southeast and south-central portion of the subject site. 16. There would be three main access points for the plat to surrounding streets. In the north- central area of the plat would be a connector road that intersects NE 2nd Street. There would be connections along the east-central and west-central areas to Jericho and Hoquiam Avenues,respectively. As noted easement roads or pipestems would provide access to interior parcels. 17. The density for the plat would be 4.57 dwelling units per acre after subtracting sensitive areas (stream and wetland)and roadways. 18. The subject site is located within the Renton School District. The project is expected to generate approximately 26 school age children. These students would be spread across the grades and would be assigned on a space available basis. Shy Creek Preliminary Plat File No.: LUA-06-009 PP, ECF June 27,2006 Page 8 400 19. The development will increase traffic approximately 610 trips and approximately ten percent of the trips,or approximately 61 additional peak hour trips will be generated in the morning and evening. 20. Stormwater will be detained in a pond in Tract G in the southwestern corner of the plat. The wetpond was sized in compliance with the 2005 King County Manual. The ERC imposed a higher standard of flow control. Staff has recommended that the pond be landscaped and a 6-foot tall, solid wood fence be provided around the tract. 21. Sewer service will be provided by the City. The applicant's plan did not appropriately show the sewer line extended along the full property boundaries. A sewer lift station will also be required but the plans submitted for the proposed location, were not approved by the City. The applicant will have to modify their plans,which would remain subject to City approval. Any septic systems on the subject site will need to be appropriately decommissioned. 22. Water service in this area will be provided by Water District 90. The applicant will need appropriate approvals from that agency. CONCLUSIONS: 1. The proposed plat appears to serve the public use and interest. The plat provides additional single-family housing choices for residents of the City. The lots will be larger NegO also affording future residents a choice of more yard space and possibly larger homes. 2. The plat and its roadway infrastructure has been designed to protect a creek and wetlands thereby preserving some of the natural amenities on the site. Clearly, the proposed buffer reduction along the creek serves the applicant but presumably the tradeoff will be an enhanced creek corridor through the subject site. In addition, the applicant will be protecting the wetland and mitigating its proposed impacts to the smaller wetland area. The creek crossing will be redesigned and a roadway will be located to avoid additional impacts to the creek. 3. The development of the plat will increase the population and with that will be the resultant impacts of additional traffic and general hubbub of a new residential community. These results were expected when the Comprehensive Plan and Zoning were adopted for this area. 4. The applicant will be paying a variety of mitigation fees to help offset its impacts on roads,parks and emergency services. In addition,the development of the plat will increase the tax base of the City. 5. The plans will have to be revised to provide appropriate utility line extensions and a suitable location for a sewer lift station. Both items will have to be approved by the City. 6. In conclusion,the plat should be approved by the City Council subject to the conditions noted below. „ Shy Creek Preliminary Plat File No.: LUA-06-009 PP, ECF June 27,2006 Page 9 RECOMMENDATION: The City Council should approve the proposed plat subject to the following conditions: 1. The applicant shall comply with all requirements of the Determination of Non- significance—Mitigated that was issued by the Environmental Review Committee on April 25, 2006. 2. Demolition permits shall be obtained and all inspections completed on the demolition of the existing residences and detached accessory structures prior to final plat approval. 3. A revised landscape plan shall be submitted prior to final plat approval to the Development Service Division project manager for review and approval. The revised landscape plan shall identify a 5-foot planting strip along the street frontage of the proposed"looped"road in addition to the perimeter roads and shall show two trees within the front yard areas of all lots within the proposed subdivision. 4. The applicant shall be required to place"No Parking" signage along the 26-foot wide private access easement prior to final plat approval. "err 5. A homeowner's association or maintenance agreement shall be created concurrently with the recording of the final plat in order to establish maintenance responsibilities for shared roadway, stormwater and utility improvements. A draft of the document(s) shall be submitted to the City of Renton Development Services Division for review and approval by the City Attorney and Property Services section prior to the recording of the final plat. 6. A revised stream mitigation plan incorporating the comments from the Watershed Co.,dated April 27, 2006 shall be submitted at the time of Utility Construction Permit Application, for review and approval by the Development Services Division Project Manager. 7. Mitigation shall be required for the impacts proposed to Wetland B. A detailed mitigation plan for the impacts proposed to Wetland B shall be submitted at the time of Utility Construction Permit Application to the Development Services Division Project Manager for review and approval. 8. A bottomless box culvert with footings located outside of the stream channel shall be the stream crossing method required for the crossing located on the east side of the project site. 9. A Native Growth Protection Easement shall be recorded over Tracts B, C,and F prior to or concurrent with the recording of the final plat map. Shy Creek Preliminary Plat File No.: LUA-06-009 PP, ECF June 27,2006 Page 10 10. The edge of the wetland and stream buffers shall be delineated with a split rail fence and identified with signage as approved by the Development Services Division Project Manager. A fencing and signage detail shall be submitted to the Development Services Division project manager at the time of Utility Construction Permit Application for review and approval. The fencing and signage shall be installed prior to the recording of the final plat. 11. The stormwater detention tract(Tract G) shall be landscaped and irrigated (unless drought tolerant plants are used)appropriately. In addition,the stormwater detention tract shall be fenced with a 6-foot solid wood fence. The applicant shall submit a landscape plan and fencing detail for the review and approval of the Development Services Project Manager prior to recording of the plat. ORDERED THIS 27th day of June 2006 FRED J. KA AN HEARING EXAMINER TRANSMITTED THIS 27th day of June 2006 to the parties of record: Jill Ding Kayren Kittrick John Skochdopole 1055 S Grady Way Development Services Connor Homes Renton,WA 98055 City of Renton 846-108`h Avenue NE Bellevue,WA 98004 Mick Matheson J. Alain Smith Pamela Sommerville Triad Associates 13415 144th Avenue SE 29604 231rd Avenue SW 12112 115t Avenue NE Renton,WA 98059 Federal Way,WA 98023 Kirkland,WA 98034 Gary&Judy Hasting Theodore&Beverly Glandon Robert Heide PO Box 7029 101 Hoquiam Avenue NE 13628 143`d Avenue SE Covington, WA 98042 Renton,WA 98059 Renton,WA 98059 TRANSMITTED THIS 27th day of June 2006 to the following: Mayor Kathy Keolker Stan Engler, Fire Jay Covington,Chief Administrative Officer Larry Meckling, Building Official Julia Medzegian, Council Liaison Planning Commission Gregg Zimmerman, PBPW Administrator Transportation Division Alex Pietsch, Economic Development Utilities Division Jennifer Henning, Development Services Neil Watts,Development Services Stacy Tucker,Development Services Janet Conklin,Development Services King County Journal Shy Creek Preliminary Plat File No.: LUA-06-009 PP, ECF June 27,2006 Page 11 `'rr✓ Pursuant to Title IV, Chapter 8, Section 100(G)of the City's Code, request for reconsideration must be filed in writing on or before 5:00 p.m.,July 11, 2006. Any aggrieved person feeling that the decision of the Examiner is ambiguous or based on erroneous procedure, errors of law or fact,error in judgment, or the discovery of new evidence which could not be reasonably available at the prior hearing may make a written request for a review by the Examiner within fourteen(14) days from the date of the Examiner's decision. This request shall set forth the specific ambiguities or errors discovered by such appellant, and the Examiner may, after review of the record,take further action, as he deems proper. An appeal to the City Council is governed by Title IV, Chapter 8, Section 110, which requires that such appeal be filed with the City Clerk,accompanying a filing fee of$75.00 and meeting other specified requirements. Copies of this ordinance are available for inspection or purchase in the Finance Department, first floor of City Hall. An appeal must be filed in writing on or before 5:00 p.m.,July 11, 2006. If the Examiner's Recommendation or Decision contains the requirement for Restrictive Covenants,the executed Covenants will be required prior to approval by City Council or final processing of the file. You may contact this office for information on formatting covenants. The Appearance of Fairness Doctrine provides that no ex parte(private one-on-one) communications may occur concerning pending land use decisions. This means that parties to a land use decision may not communicate in private with any decision-maker concerning the proposal. Decision-makers in the land use process include both the Hearing Examiner and members of the City Council. All communications concerning the proposal must be made in public. This public communication permits all interested parties to know the contents of the communication and would allow them to openly rebut the evidence. Any violation of this doctrine would result in the invalidation of the request by the Court. The Doctrine applies not only to the initial public hearing but to all requests for Reconsideration as well as Appeals to the City Council *tot am 7,4 < < f ! ' . , SITE ii { I 1 • 1 I 1, "''iw___.rte+ _c..j r C F .: {;f_ ' L E k —1-1----,-1 1k ,F` �� --'^rA/% 'f . 5 1 r i i • r%/j f f /4/i, ,, 7.•:1. AN .*.0011 ' .,,:: k.2'.-J');*,.. .A11: . ft„..., , lei/ t,i' . i r-7-,,,, :-..-_,...,,, . ; ,_ wr, ...., / ,, ,..u.i „ .,/, ,,_ 4 �t c Lri i i .o � } ; $ ( ( F6 - 15 T2,3N R5E W 1/2, : . Irr i . 140th Ave. tzi t . tx1 140th ,Avco o. SE 1 c) ,,,. .. .."-**1 o-..---*---•--"'*"a••••••-........*....•••••.....*...........J •••••••"-- -...1'''' 73, C/2 c.' CAD r\D 70 CO CO '•TT: ti.142nd Ave. SE 142 ndp \\Ave. SE ta. L! I j ii g , 143rd Ave. SE II7 143rd Ave. SE , ,-.., 1 t-3 CO 1 'As • 0 1 t•-) — Jericho Ave Na ' I ''' 1 • . z Jexi.c r if c.n C/2 tmi r4" /45th Ave. SE ..... 11 .,_CP 7:•. 4.! - E et c.,3 ..P-1,.... -i'>(••-• .',./ - ../Vei,- 5-- v No e-) 146th Ave. SE ,-.0 L ons Ave. NE :14-, , ' -.,41-4 •ns, ..—t/ . - , , I -77 ) I i i I 'I-. -4...... . „,. ''t• . , \ ; '", , 148th P1. SE - ' , 73 . vi A,. 1 1 tt ,, . • '..... 7/' 4.... .,..„; 149th Pl. SE ,'Org.. . i - k rri Iiwri cA ,/,, <, . ' - 70 we , SM. • 1 --.- ON . Mile MINIIIIIIMII .. �xr• PORTIONS OF NE 1/4 , SE 1/4 AND SE 1/4, SE 1/4 SEC. 15, TWP. 23 N., RGE. 5 E., W.M. /A I 11 0-.. 1111121110.00 421421,MN ' R.O.W.(hmntbn Ir 1I,'d i t 1 1 1100.1•7.011•• __ s "t . I Rd.w.oemooted 2r 1 �I I '1111 yI ( 11 _111_1.. �� _ .,.,. +i•� ' IIIIIII ry I 77 it 111' rII Ro.w psdbi. „I 1'e ---'7.--17--- L..-ou = - 77"" 4........--4,-_,- rr M •VENUE NE reN00'1�'47'E *t' 1315 J°°' �.��. `• I r. 14' Pa. ( lr I1 A 1r — - 2293 g 4 ss - R ^Ya �, "ss s6 r7 y se 59 60 b, I ° a ,a • f, A ,5ee''' ,zoo sr 7200 u ,zoo ' '' 1 1 �, �h - _ ei• rr \ ;� ♦ 9§.ra Sr I 1 >aoo Srsr spao sr zzoo sr 7910 Y ,, 1 ` " .rl _�. 5 k 1 G t 1 , _ 11 _ _._ , L_ > L J 1 L 2 4 I , { �-' tu' „ 3, a�u�)(., r r- - r r'r i t^.?2__.—r O 8 ----- rte;V 301 i- .1..1...h.:;!4 --” • Tracy c .ar �'\ TRAtt0. ,$ , ---' '' ' v W Detention 1',i r•I 1 J991'SF tl W } yCg e .' asen SF F 1 . i ISI _1 1 51 i'I SO 49 1a 7 17 46 i' 45 44 43 41 ,. W 1 z , I` Al , ' p d5ee sF 1 reeve SF *> 77¢a.Br' I �. 75ea u ,zoo ar I zzoo sr rroo s"1 i' zzoo sr 1I II rzoo sr , ,zoo sr'.,, 7291 sr: x• � 2 O V 6 �4asss _"_ r _�L ` `- +- -� L- --y �- - -� L - LJ - - J F-- J L a L. -y _ to• If = Y f \ sR--, ,,. i• w---�9 .-`—C_-_. `,'• - 1..,1 L.• Ceex�..l,�, as "d' r.. W W T'w -1 1 -- i it �p4R ` rrlir i 1 1 {�Dcd iI t� �ti iI' a' :•.• "11 I t /. I ' Y__a - 1 y� 2d 1 38 ' g 19 19 41 1, ;; kk P 1 I I 'MR sF. O ---- ri ' 71 0,i 11 T 13..1 I erar sr z sF(NETJI I71ss sr(nrp 7a1a sr(I+c) ` _ ro.uasr"111 ae sr ,ls9e sF(GPOSSJ' i!*1 tt ----- - 3sf 1 t` >4e2 _, sf sr 1,''zaoo sr 1 `sm sr ,za sr _.--.•- I= - - ° a l I J t J r Cm' r,r --- ,. ',., . \.N-._. TRA�TC a.r -„ " �' dt i.- ' $I & Z�,:S Is 1 I''' 1 ` 1 J��i 007H'17'W 140.041111}}.1 2 ___ 1- ♦ ' _- C, 7220 Sr _--1'WAi 1 _. V w {1 . r-1--7--1;--1-1.'-^,I _1 I �r --I 1r a.rt- 1 1 it r� ---- L- - I --.--' _ •. !10 r It I 14 } "-ff--'-� I .16 I 1 17. 1,,s ''y'1#8� L I ' 19 ' I 10 I 71 ._. --�,. _1 _ b y i i la7 sr 1 1 rzea sr • 7414 sr� r i .7131 sF �.1'•.,`tib 4§.1 ! %I I 1. 1 I k r___ "-'1- - rf w L. .._I 1 1 e 1 ... '' '�7"t r I 1 I ,T]1 er t r I 1 ,z I1 Sr IJIJ SF 1 �I 50078'47"W a II t 3 M: I I ' I ♦ I 'TRACT ' ' it' 30 i 36 1' '' tt R I VI f 1 r�'I` _ _ JLI I L-,7_J L J L_R\t J 1. J ' 7 7 22 57�.- i 7o02 sr -' 71.98' e.l.,�sic..w.a I r U I n l T iit Opp,5px} �l"' 1 1 j x �T--�I ` ;�� T ♦ , T4s3e s"F e.uu.,q r Cern.,e u.T� I I j 3 ----- pQ -- —-- a _ 3ernennx-- - .. ...p n'�•"''_ Ind ..49=9.dmo+4sx '/ , 1'F-A.,-TEarOnrr(i Ilt, ',LT. ! y1 a 1I/ -.7,-,, ��t� nd ,me�.9.�I era sPi � _ •). ¢ 9 -LL Y YS i 16 .> °4 x $`, •,-,' a u. a w' . at " �� t'. °s , '1 IS 0 35 I • 5 111 721 ( >4 r IJ:jI:- 57 A• � • _77 7274 IF J 17773 Sr � L, - 1 r___ ____ ____ _.i TRACT, lL _ L '-'./u' .....0..-___...aim_,_....ar �� '�� ' `' 1` r' 1 i, ,we sr z�. -o -_ --_- o -�I I �+ I� � �1, �+ � d a � v -- - -- I J, s .c a IN Y 1,,.. 11 4QRen Space e i y _ .a a . ." J.. ,, v,, °4. a L• _.xew- ` ==_� =--9--7007.000-,•• _ - ._ — _ F - T ^r +w ®» rN6%4,16-:*. __��!J._s.. .m, _ ==+— _ ero 4h okicFTRemnT ca � q aa,..r. - - = �-ror-v � ;i�-- r-__3 " - m xom as-z,t- 1 y ROW DeM IDb i e _ k1r Rue ro' n.xM x • r.�.st 27 km«i ham m�lryyl. 1 'T 1 I ��� 1 i 1 EmnD6 wnnna saI$l'i'df!' 1i1¢ PRELIMINARY 1 9-12="dae I I I I. r7.--ill E 11iIr1 �` ,,.3r 1 1 I I •`:.%-1'' IOS-/2-06 RUR Ser 2 anm MIMI INDI,Nim IIIIMMIMEMOMMEMI .? '°'Ra 03-185 I ¢. x"x N 12 4 020 ,A.¢..20¢10,x2 MEMN ►Malin CITY OF RENTON DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE-MITIGATED MITIGATION MEASURES err APPLICATION NO(S): LUA06-009, PP, ECF _ APPLICANT: Conner Homes Co.,John Skochdopole PROJECT NAME: Shy Creek Preliminary Plat DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSAL: Applicant proposes to subdivide an existing 703,058 square foot (16.1 acre)site into 61 lots and 7 tracts. The site is located within the Residential-4 dwelling unit per acre(R-4)zoning designation. An existing residence and associated detached accessory structures are proposed to be removed. The proposed lots would range in size from 7,200 square feet to 9,844 square feet.- Access to the proposed lots would be provided via an internal access 'looped' road. A Class 4 stream with a required 35-foot buffer and Category. 3 wetland with a 25-foot required buffer are located on the subject site. Two stream crossings are proposed, approximately 418 feet of stream are proposed to be relocated, and a reduction in the stream buffer width down to 25 feet is also proposed. In addition approximately O.4 acres of wetland are proposed to be filled. Mitigation for the wetland and stream impacts would be provided onsite. LOCATION OF PROPOSAL: 129,„JadeffttriVenue,NE LEAD AGENCY: l h City of Renton Deentof,e an �,9/B ile ./Public Works �N& Oevdopment Plant lg9 c ti n MITJGA]TION M ASURES: '' . The applicant shall comply h the recur f n on in the geo,clinical report prepared by Earth Consultants,Inc. dated Febr-ua. '1, "5 ;> ,��:Y 2. The applicant shall be required ;. provide a .E'•c), ry v,i0.pn and Sedime (•tion Control Plan (TESCP) designed pursuant to the Department of r n>.« ggy's&rose j ,J,` $e. 6-:fir t Co9tp1 R-;_ cements outlined in Volume it of the Sforrnwater Management Manpt$vide staff with -a Co n I igation" Plan prior to issuance of Ccnstructton Permits. This cone e`E I 'v subject to the rev an a 4.ppn3val of the Development Services Diviston. € t!' 3. The.adetention system for this project shtitl a*ter to comply With ,ir requirements found in the 2005 King County ,Surface Water Design Manual. r 4. The applicant shall be required.to_relocate the propose t0-foot wide entrance to the plat to a location where the wetland"-and its associated buffer would not be impacted. 5. `The applicant shall pay a Parks Mitigation Fee based on$530.76 per each new single family lot. 6The proposed project shall comply with.the recommendations found in the Traffic Impact Analysis prepared by _Transportation Engineering;NorthWest'dated January 26, 2006 including The payment of a Traffic Mitigation Fee in the amount of$75 per net new average daily trip. 7. Staff recommends that the applicant pay a Fire Mitigation Fee based on$488;OO'per new single family lot. • :RC Mitrgatren Measures Pana 1 of 1 WORLD SAVINGS EXHIBIT "A" LEGAL DESCRIPTION LOAN NO. 0017564031 ALL THAT CERTAIN REAL PROPERTY SITUATE) IN THE COUNTY OF K I NG STATE OF WASH I NOTON DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS 0 o ' r Tract 31, BLACK LOAM nIVC ACRL TRACTS, according to the Plat thereof recorded in Volume 12 of Plats, page 101, in King County, Washington o Situate in the County of King, State of Washington r 111 00430.13 107 15 01/1.011 A30C WA ( F6 - 15 T23N R5E W 1/2 �' I � \\ . CJZ i t TT iL r • Cl C)1I aa ' . I( 40th Avej d\ t _ ---_ `' l r ii 4 Nr...,._-------\-7- ___.,...,=..... 140th AveSE \\:1,1:, co 142nd Ave SSE 142 ii 1 nd_j (Ave.i LSE J f 0 µ F oItr 143rd Ave. SE /( 143rd Ave. SE I N -- , 1 CO lw,a . c N . SE y 1 ,..3 144th Ave-7,4—E— ye, SE � , aha. 41416. 4.' z ` . tJericho Ave NEI- co "z z � f i 6 2 .._ .L717730 Jech {45thAveSE i 1- t� • E tri cflC.AD p, -P; • . ,ham: - Cb (4 4 N 146th Ave. SE , Lyons Ave. NE ,s--, • L, •ns.... - ► D _ . . `? a'....... R ,4 ,- , ! l a.. i I , Z ° �- '•••^'----- . - : .. : _ 4i1e Ave Pvl th _ 148 P... ,SE �7\ A . . tt 149th PISS _ -'`f 11121 laillP a-- 73 c� ;'Or` ' - _ ior, ' i wN „it ''') j IIEMIONNIMINIM PORTIONS OF NE 1/4 , SE 1/4 AND SE 1/4, SE 1/4 SEC. 15, TWP. 23 N., RGE. 5 E., W.M. /T\ Thr-1 i---—-,.-7-r----1 111 , ---„,..„ _1__1__ II t i I T.', II, I 121„,no Roo poe I-1 OE -IL-ii--. , L-- -----,'r' i 4.2,51..614 I i I I 6 I I f,' \IJ r• 7-1 f-(r----1 -7--) c-L-'1•`',----11.• __----I.,___, 1__,....•,- t., ., 1 •, ; 1 i r_i i______r .......... \„_,. , .......... _,__,_,q , , , , .‘„,___,.,,..„, ,,,.....).,.....,--, ‘,„, .,•,..---- I I I I EirE I 1'1 II ,_ 11111 i i'- _.<1\ r,,-, - [--- i ii 1 \ -\./ 1 \ \ , ______ / 1, ---1 / e \ i MIIIIIIIIIMINI --- 'f--- it---- \ LI 1\rl/ L. , , I--7-7 1 1 11,111.1.111111 :If) I I i 2E1 . 1 r-- , 1-- t-' -----11 _I- --! 1 1 • , 1 _i ' - • 11.111 Jo1.11111111.1 I i H),'L - 4 I' ----, ,, IT.7.7)0F \ 1-----; '•„,-.1-'--l'-I.- ' I---.1 I I . MIU lin :• 15, I,4 i„ Nall , II v,... l FL,;,_ ,, ,,,t.---_,:in, -...,,,_„—EN, II-114 -..--I a. a -J_ -' - -Lk___t___ ; J___.,n•1,___L_ ' ,' ;-• ; - -,-,--`-, ; 1 I -F---F- - gou um—110E1 Ei I I [ I I r- ', I 41.1111.11111 Q sl k I I i 1 . 11._-' _j L-1 I 4 . . 1-1,-j-if-1--' -El L '--r--111.1E NE 1 1 . . - LYONS AVE NE -- WI'ao 1 1 i i ' - 1 ' F 4 \F --) 1 1111 II Q F-1-,--1--r-- ,__ 1 1 :-.1 /77- -/ i " } / 1111 'H h T 7 t -A4i--1--- I II-.1, 1 L ----7 k ',. i ,'•.)--',----.7- -tr-t--' 1 1 ---L--I 1 1 r'-' ' if ;.- t j i , 1 i i L I--,.-,i,',”:‘'. ',-.1: -',- -•/ --I ""•'---1 _JL1--i i I 1-7 11 I ' ---( -• ,-- •-/ .1.1 -.,...k L___I__ .1__L_ r--I I _1_ '' i -la r----1,4 - ii , i , , -- 1 , 1 , 1 .f"',:`.;::•.",.._._..._i : ,, HI L . 1 ' - ' 1 i --.--1--1—7--- ,L--, „-----1 • , 1 t I f 1 's 1 .- ,-_____..J --1 ! t_,_ _,L,, , ,. •• .._ 0 I 1 , ' 1 ''-•--+ r -1 / ,f--1-1, 1 1,1.0 OF 1101IET.e110015 11 j; 1 1-- 1 - , -- •01,1 q r‘,4 I IN •--''i ""•---'' ,'yEncH0-;TVO-NE-, ,-- -,_--.7 , , , , , ,_ _,z7_,.__JERI HO AVE NE 144TH AVE.7g-"-- 1 I I ( ' ' ----L-----'.--:, __LL_L./ ti____D __ dEftICHR AIE4E1,144TH_AVE SE e ,„ Ell.,.i ii •1 itil' i I' 4 4'..:''' i 111 . :Ii1 . 1 ; 1,-1 , , : j ---2 .,--r--7-7-r- - . ---1-1 r-I cet4I I NI . • • ' • • - 1 I i 1 1 "1-1_1_1__Lil)1_-;_ 1 i al 1 i ' 2 t i ' I, -= ±(';-.1-FFIrj--1 1 ! J I I I -I 1- ' 1 ' I '41 1-- . rt.' ' •rt I ,is,ir IQ'th 1 t:',":.:.04 ...) . I , , '.22. ., 7 , .... il,---' . , , ...._.÷._ .., • ..... .. "--' i' 1 I A ' 111111 0- 1 i--H I ir- ,,,:,•-,-,r4----, 1------fill 1 -2,- r---"-' --'2 - .4,,- -qr. .;bg ,,g,;,...,.m t---f------:-.7-----4---4----1 i 1 ,.., -1P-'-'F' I hid ' '- , -A-lit--_--.,lefr---1 I IF r--- , gra---i I- ---, 4.1 0 .3 ""46 rsigi,A,Tyil ....,,o..,,,..:i _...i ...... _• __r_...„ , , >f, • , : r f . F d I i i 1 f J-11 11 Erl If , . . ...kr u:X,`, gi r ..1-_,.. - 1 1 -'''',. N.:4-• i 1 . 1.,_ ,..11_, .---- , ___ „ ,w..-312-„ '• ' ./ Trim - - --HOUOUlAk AVE HE-- - -j-----' S.'• ' I I r -7--7- I- 1-1--F--- T-rrn itc--7--1 kr-, mii ' ----; f--- ' ,:----' 1 i I I I Li.,1-J 1(4,j-11 k• , , I\ t 1 , t_.1, .1 , ,_-_, .._]1 Nil _ _ I I '0(° -1-' h .I i CO I ' , ,-----' h- 1111W' .,--_ • 1 , , , -, , , -.,,,,. t -'"-.71-71''st't - c . I k..7sr,.:1,1,L I_it , i 14 ty 411111.1111111.1111 ‘, , L -r',.J r” , 1 ' Nem 1 I \ -1 iiii \ I P -- - . -...„1 ____/4 , li \ ..-Irlar:Kr-4**(KKKr \. .,I r;1- / ;up 1 i / A\ , i NE ..)-r- + .. ._. L.-_.11._ ...., I_L___,..1_,„(1._. i-- I ',...r'am I• - ---: 4QTrti AVE SE ri,.....,t i , ,, ,...,.,_ , .,, A r 1 1...I P rmh4___ i4------E,___ -- co 1 I I 1 L I .4,„77) \ / ,,, I /4,..,,Jr: i I // i , i i ',--4,---,,,>--\_j_____-1.--1—, , ,., 1 -7HJ "1, Ii v - -- 1,- 1 Muterizioner i 1 v - -7---I T- ! '' fil"4--\----\9 -7---r1--C--T-F-':s- -• \ ______I ".•:``":::!....•'`'..,,o, . iii?-11-9-k-lr, 1 ---••••• I! moloonmis r , , t / 1--------A ' I PRELIMINARY . , , 1 1 1r---i I i 1 ' I ' ,‘ ' . -- ' .-- ! I L__ 1; I ' 1 - I , ,.... -_J-_ ; 1 . I I 1--L_ i,---4 ----4 r,--- --- _s !F-7-_-2,....• 0.-N, - ; 1 • •-- -: oc4'-'- r.i • , 1 ,; , i , ; ' ! 11 i -im 1 , 1 XI '—' ---t"'"Si4,7,,.*".',:,;.,---7.!-,t'-.1 ' ‘,t--•- ----j: -' .:---_-_--,--. '-'-'-----,' r--r---1 . . .,.i !------i F-1. -7 -7 I-' "----1 ' i ' I 1 P*4.11---I i " , *- 1)(). '!. • i • i '''TA' ,! __4 ' --r SCALE12 , ' 0-',..rpe5., ----4..r.----. . ,., -....,-- ',.--.., 1,-----,----...,_--;___ _Li.._ , , , , 1-7-1 ; ; :-.'1---1 0-41(01-1-1 r '. . r.r. •rr. ,11,110 tOr-M120 k c, MRS SICKD AO 0.1119 0345 ), . „ ..."no. 12.12 ! CITY OF RENTON COUNCIL AGENDA BILL AI#: gi Submitting Data: Planning/Building/Public Works For Agenda of: Dept/DivBoard.. Transportation Division August 7, 2006 Staff Contact Ryan Zulauf, Airport Manager Agenda Status (x7471) Consent X Subject: Public Hearing.. Correspondence.. Addendum to Aerodyne Lease LAG 006-84 Ordinance Resolution Old Business Exhibits: New Business X Issue Paper Study Sessions Lease Addendum Information Recommended Action: Approvals: Legal Dept X Refer to Transportation/Aviation Committee Finance Dept Other Fiscal Impact: Expenditure Required... Transfer/Amendment Amount Budgeted Revenue Generated $22,437.05 Total Project Budget City Share Total Project SUMMARY OF ACTION: There are three actions taking place in this lease addendum to LAG 006-84: 1. A Consumer Price Index increase to the Aerodyne lease for improved and unimproved leased areas; 2. A ten-year extension of the existing lease beginning on September 1, 2006 and ending on August 31, 2016; and 3. Assignment of lease LAG 006-84 from Southcove Ventures, LLC to Aerodyne, LLC. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Approve the lease addendum to LAG 006-84 with Southcove Ventures, LLC, doing business as Aerodyne, LLC. H:\File Sys\AIR-Airport,Transportation Services Division\03 Projects\OlTasks\Agenda Bills\Aerodyne Lease Addendum LAG 006-84 4-06\Agbill aerodyne 7-6-06.doc ,k( Y O PLANNINGBUILDING/ `11.11110' r, C PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT • MEMORANDUM• DATE: August 7, 2006 TO: Randy Corman, Council President Members of the Renton City Council VIA: .4 Kathy Keolker, Mayor, FROM: Gregg Zimmermari,'Administrator STAFF CONTACT: Ryan Zulauf, Airport Manager(x7471) SUBJECT: Addendum to Aerodyne Lease LAG 006-84 ISSUE: Should Council approve an addendum to LAG 006-84 with Southcove Ventures, LLC? RECOMMENDATION: New Approve the lease addendum to LAG 006-84 with Southcove Ventures, LLC, doing business as Aerodyne, LLC. BACKGROUND SUMMARY: There are three actions taking place in this lease addendum to LAG 006-84: 1. A Consumer Price Index increase to the Aerodyne lease for improved and unimproved leased areas; 2. A ten-year extension of the existing lease beginning on September 1, 2006 and ending on August 31, 2016; and 3. Assignment of lease LAG 006-84 from Southcove Ventures, LLC to Aerodyne, LLC. cc: Jay Covington,CAO Peter Hahn, Deputy P/B/PW Administrator—Transportation Ryan Zulauf,Airport Manager Connie Brundage,Transportation Administrative Secretary Susan Campbell/Carolyn Currie,Airport Secretary H:\File Sys\AIR-Airport,Transportation Services Division\03 Projects\OlTasks\Agenda Bills\Aerodyne Lease Addendum LAG 006- 84 4-06\Issue Paper Aerodyne Lease Addendum 7-7-06.doc LAG 006-84 *4410 Addendum# ADDENDUM TO LEASE AGREEMENT (City of Renton to Southcove Ventures, LLC, dba Aerodyne LLC) THIS ADDENDUM to Lease Agreement 006-84 is effective as of the date of execution by the City of Renton, as indicated on the last page of this addendum. RECITALS: WHEREAS, on September 1, 1984, Plane Space Investments, Inc. entered into Lease Agreement LAG 006-84, and leased four contiguous parcels at the south end of the Airport, consisting of three unimproved parcels of 39,030 square feet, referred to as the Vehicle Parking Lot, East Tiedown Area and West Tiedown Area, and one improved parcel of 42,936 square feet consisting of an existing hangar building, and WHEREAS, on September 2, 1994, Plane Space Investments assigned Lease LAG 006- 84, in its entirety, to Puget Sound Industries, Inc., and WHEREAS, on March 25, 1997, Puget Sound Industries assigned Lease LAG 006-84, in its entirety, to Cliff Howard and Fred Bahr, and WHEREAS, on April 29, 1999, Cliff Howard and Fred Bahr assigned Lease LAG 006-84, '440.144 in its entirety, to Southcove Ventures, LLC, and WHEREAS, during September 2002, the land rental rate for the approximately 39,030 square feet of unimproved land area leased by Southcove Ventures, LLC was determined to be $0.1641 per square foot per year and continuing until August 31, 2005; and WHEREAS, on September 1, 2005, and for the ensuing three (3) year period, the land rental rate was adjusted, using the Consumer Price Index-Urban, to a rate of$0.17 per square foot per year for the 39,030 square feet of leased area, resulting in an annual rental amount of $6,635.10 (39,030_x $0.17 = $6,635.10), and continuing until August 31, 2008, and WHEREAS, during September 2002, the land rental rate for the approximately 42,936 square feet of improved land area leased by Southcove Ventures, LLC was determined to be $0.3282 per square foot per year and continuing until August 31, 2005; and WHEREAS, on September 1, 2005, and for the ensuing three (3) year period, the land rental rate was adjusted, using the Consumer Price Index-Urban, to a rate of$0.35 per square foot per year for the 42,936 square feet of leased area, resulting in an annual rental amount of $15,027.60 (42,936 x $0.35 = $15,027.60), and continuing until August 31, 2008, and LAG 006-84 r.r Addendum# WHEREAS, on October 28, 2005, Southcove Ventures, LLC agreed to increase its unimproved leased area by 4,555 square feet for a total unimproved leased area of 43,585 square feet, and WHEREAS, the initial lease term of twenty two (22) years ends on August 31, 2006, and WHEREAS, Section 23 of LAG 006-84 and Section 2.2 of PAG-97-03, which amends LAG 006-84, provide for a ten (10) year lease extension, such that the date of termination would be August 31, 2016, and WHEREAS, Section 2 of PAG-97-03, Addendum #02-97 which amends LAG 006-84 provides for an additional ten (10) year lease extension, such that the date of termination would be August 31, 2026, and WHEREAS, Section 23 of LAG 006-84 and Section 2.2 of PAG-97-03, which amends LAG 006-84, stipulate that lease extension is available to be exercised by the Lessee if the Lessee "has fully and faithfully complied with all of the terms and conditions of the lease agreement and gives written notice of the exercise of such option at least ninety (90) days prior to the end of the original term of the lease", and WHEREAS, On March 2, 2006, Southcove Ventures LLC provided written notification to the City of its intent to exercise its option to extend LAG 006-84 for another ten (10) years, and WHEREAS, Southcove Ventures LLC, is a Lessee in good standing with the Lessor, and WHEREAS, during May 2004, Southcove Ventures, LLC notified the City of Renton of their desire to assign the lease from Southcove Venture LLC to Aerodyne LLC, and WHEREAS, the legal name of Aerodyne, LLC is on file with the Secretary of State as of May 25, 2004. NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY AGREED AND COVENANTED BY AND BETWEEN THE CITY OF RENTON AND SOUTHCOVE VENTURES, LLC, AS FOLLOWS: WITNESSETH: 1. Lessor and Lessee agree that the difference between the CPI-U of April 2002 to June 16, 2005, is 6.6% (201.3 — 188.8 / 188.8 = 0.0662 or 6.6%). This results in an annual rate increase from $0.1641 to $0.17 per square foot (0.1641 x 1.066 = $0.17) for the 43,585 square feet of unimproved area, and an annual rate increase from $0.3282 to $0.35 per square foot (0.3282 x 1.066 = $0.35) for the 42,936 square feet of improved area, and 2. The Lessor and Lessee do hereby agree to an annual land rent of$7,409.45 (43,585 x 0.17 = 7,409.45) for the 43,585 square feet of unimproved land identified in Lease Lease Agreement 006-84 2 City of Renton to Southcove Ventures,dba Aerodyne LLC LAG 006-84 Addendum# Agreement LAG 003-84, and an annual land rent of$15,027.60 (42,936 x 0.35 = 15,027.60) for the 42,936 square feet of improved land identified in Lease Agreement LAG 003-84, and 3. Lessor and Lessee do hereby agree that the annual land rent rate in Paragraph 1 shall remain in effect until August 31, 2008, and effective as of that date the rental rate shall automatically be readjusted by and between the parties using the increase of the Consumer Price Index, and for each three (3) year period thereafter. Minimum base rental for any extended period shall not be less than the current annual rental of $7,409.45 for unimproved ground area and $15,027.60 for improved ground area. 4. Lessor and Lessee do hereby further agree that the Consumer Price Index information to be used for rental adjustments shall be the Consumer Price Index-Urban (CPI-U) then in effect for all urban consumers, as published by the US Department of Labor for the Seattle-Tacoma Metropolitan Area. 5. Lessor and Lessee do hereby further agree that at least thirty (30) days prior to the Rental Adjustment Date either party shall, if they desire to adjust the base land rental rate for the ensuing three (3) year period by a means other than the Consumer Price Index-Urban, provide to the other party a written request for readjustment of the rental rate pursuant to RCW 14.08.120(5). 6. Lessor and Lessee do hereby agree that LAG 006-84 is extended for an additional ten (10) years beginning on September 1, 2006 and ending on August 31, 2016; and 7. Lessor and Lessee do hereby agree that LAG 006-84 and associated addenda has been assigned to Aerodyne LLC, and 8. All other terms and conditions of the original Lease Agreement and Addenda shall remain in full force and effect. Lease Agreement 006-84 3 City of Renton to Southcove Ventures,dba Aerodyne LLC LAG 006-84 Addendum# SOUTHCOVE VENTURES LLC CITY OF RENTON dba AERODYNE LLC a Municipal Corporation a Washington Corporation Mayor Kathy Keolker Title Bonnie Walton, City Clerk Date Approved as to legal form City Attorney *New Lease Agreement 006-84 4 City of Renton to Southcove Ventures,dba Aerodyne LLC CITY OF RENTON COUNCIL AGENDA BILL AI#: "' / Loi Submitting Data: Planning/Building/Public Works For Agenda of: Dept/Div/Board.. Transportation Systems August 7, 2006 Staff Contact Peter Hahn, Deputy PBPW Agenda Status Administrator - Transportation (x7242) Consent X Subject: Public Hearing.. Correspondence.. I-405 Cedar River Vicinity Charette Concept Ordinance Concurrence Letter Resolution Old Business Exhibits: New Business X Issue Paper Study Sessions Concurrence Letter Information Recommended Action: Approvals: Legal Dept Council concur Finance Dept Other Fiscal Impact: Expenditure Required... $0 Transfer/Amendment $0 Amount Budgeted $0 Revenue Generated%se Total Project Budget $0 City Share Total Project.. $0 SUMMARY OF ACTION: This proposed concurrence letter addresses the design issues and potential impacts in the vicinity of Liberty Park and Cedar River Park as a result of implementing the I-405 Master Plan. Design challenges include the City's water supply system, the Cedar River, the Burlington Northern Santa Fe Railroad, Houser Way South, parks, and underground utilities. To address these complex issues, a four-day design charette was held in July 2005. The results of the charette were summarized in the Cedar River Vicinity Charette, Solutions for Parks, Wells and Local Access report. This proposed concurrence letter is mainly intended to document that the City concurs in the general design concept developed in the charette, and that this design concept will be considered the preferred "build" alternative in the I-405, I-5 to SR 169 Implementation Plan (or Master Plan) Environmental Assessment that began in May 2006. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Authorize the Mayor and City Clerk to sign a concurrence letter with the Washington State Department of Transportation, agreeing with the I-405 Cedar River Vicinity Charette concept as the "Build Alternative" to be evaluated in the I-405, I-5 to SR 169 Implementation Plan (or Master Plan) Environmental Assessment. H:\TRANS\ADMIN\AGENDA 2006\ Cedar River Vic Charette Agenda Bill.doc 6ti`S �� PLANNING/BUILDING/ cm,• ♦ PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT .11 - N rc0 MEMORANDUM DATE: August 7, 2006 TO: Randy Corman, Council President Members of the Renton City Council VIA: Kathy Keolker, Mayor FROM: a Gregg Zimmermari"1 PW Administrator STAFF CONTACT: Peter Hahn, Deputy PBPW Administrator—Transportation (x7242) SUBJECT: I-405 Cedar River Vicinity Charette Concept Concurrence Letter ISSUE: Should the Mayor sign a concurrence letter with the Washington State Department of Transportation (WSDOT) regarding the I-405 Cedar River Vicinity Charette concept? Now RECOMMENDATION: Authorize the Mayor and City Clerk to sign a concurrence letter with the Washington State Department of Transportation, agreeing with the I-405 Cedar River Vicinity Charette concept as the "Build Alternative" to be evaluated in the I-405, I-5 to SR 169 Implementation Plan (or Master Plan) Environmental Assessment. BACKGROUND: The October 20021-405 Corridor Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) established the Master Plan concept for I-405. The 5-cent and 91/4-cent gas taxes enacted by the State Legislature provide for the I-405, I-5 to SR 169 Widening Project (Phase 1 or "Nickel Project") in Renton and 5% design of the Master Plan in Renton. Since March 2005, the City and WSDOT have signed eight concurrence letters in order to document design decisions and agreements on a number of issues related to the I-405 project. This proposed concurrence letter addresses the design issues and potential impacts in the Nome vicinity of Liberty and Cedar River parks as a result of implementing the ultimate I-405 Randy Corman,Council President Members of the Renton City Council Page 2 of 2 August 7,2006 4441104 Master Plan. Design challenges include the City's water supply system, the Cedar River, the Burlington Northern Santa Fe Railroad, Houser Way South, parks, and underground utilities. To address these complex issues, a four-day design charette was held in July 2005. The results of the charette were summarized in the Cedar River Vicinity Charette, Solutions for Parks, Wells & Local Access report. This proposed concurrence letter is mainly intended to document that the City concurs in the general design concept developed in the charette, and that this design concept will be considered the preferred "build" alternative in the I-405, I-5 to SR 169 Implementation Plan (or Master Plan) Environmental Assessment which began in May 2006. Further design details and refinements will be developed through additional project development stages to support the I-405 environmental assessment and to confirm the feasibility of the charette concept. Attached for review are the proposed concurrence letter and the Cedar River Vicinity Charette, Solutions for Parks, Wells & Local Access report. Attachments Cc: Peter Hahn,Deputy PBPW Administrator—Transportation Jim Seitz, Transportation Planning&Programming Supervisor Keith Woolley,Transportation Planning and Programming Leslie Betlach,Parks Director Lys Hornsby,Utility Systems Director Abdoul Gafour,Water Utility Supervisor Constance Brundage,Transportation Administrative Secretary **Si h:\division.s\transpor.tat\admin\agenda 2006\cedar river vic charette agenda bill issue paper.doc INTERSTATE 1 405 Corridor Program Congestion Relief& Bus Rapid Transit 600-108th Avenue NE,Suite 405 Bellevue,WA 98004 lkirov Main 425-456-8500 Fax 425-456-8600 June 21, 2006 MS:NB82-250 Gregg Zimmerman, Planning/Building/Public Works Administrator City of Renton 1055 South Grady Way Renton, WA 98055 Dear Mr. Zimmerman: Re: Letter of Concurrence I-405 Cedar River Vicinity Charette Concept This letter documents that the City of Renton and Washington State Department of Transportation (WSDOT)concur with the July 2005, I-405 Cedar River Vicinity Charette. The City of Renton and WSDOT work accomplished through July 2005 by the 1-405 Wells and Parks Task Force was documented in a letter of concurrence dated July 8, 2005 and executed by the Mayor of Renton on December 13, 2005. Though this task force addressed many of the design challenges that are expected with implementation of the I-405 Corridor Program in the vicinity of the City's water supply system, Liberty Park,Cedar River Park, and the Narco property, many outstanding issues and Ned decisions remain. To address some of these outstanding issues and decisions, a design charette was held the week of July 11-14, 2005. The workshop, along with solutions identified through the process, is summarized in the Cedar River Vicinity Charette, Solutions for Parks, Wells &Local Access report. The primary challenge addressed in the charette was to identify a means for three major public facilities—the City of Renton water supply system(pumps, wells and transmission facilities), the City of Renton Liberty, Cedar River and Narco recreational facilities, and an improved(widened)Interstate 405—to co-exist in a physically constrained area. Each of these facilities provides an important function to the public which can not be compromised. Through this charette process, the City and WSDOT were able to develop a concept (as portrayed on pages 16 and 17 of the charette report)which resolved the key issues associated with this primary challenge. While this concept was a major step in defining a solution for this difficult situation, it is only one step that is required to come to a complete resolution. Further details and refinements will be worked out as the 1-405 corridor program progresses through these additional project development stages: • Footprint development for I-405/1-5 to SR 169 Implementation Plan NEPA Environmental Assessment–funded by the 2005 legislature and initiated with agency and public scoping meetings held on May 23, 2006. • 15% design development in preparation of I-405 Implementation Plan for selecting a design- builder–currently unfunded. • Final design and construction of the 1-405 Implementation Plan by the selected design-builder– currently unfunded. �► C:IDocuments and SettingslcynthialLocal SettingslTemporary Internet FilesIOLKAICedar River Vicinity Charette Letter of Concurrence v5.doc Washington State Department of Transportation • :,, 1 . A T. ,:„,.01.10.1 ..• i :, 0*.,,.----, r4a : --- 'T41 1 - onto''-:. - °i•',405444.4140........„ , ..10.., " „....... . li ,‘• 'i f.'", '''• ''''.1 01044. reorrolte• 1 .4, ....` ' '< .-,, .':«4"4" ''.'' ''''._',., _ ,'" µOWN ;•''.',','''''c' ,,,, I \--,7*--' . _so .",;41 / v * 4, .40041.13',"'"- - ' '',,% : \-, 7. .4 .4...- , - '. • - -4514tPr avrtiroomb '4'-'iWr.:',:-.:' \ A ...._.., . ........_. „ • ! : -: ,. .. --A1/4 ',7-'';':::' r",:,<,,,, ' f-tirewr • Novo. 5:,' ,' /-44.• ,' 1.46rr.4 4'..,,,,:io , ,..:,.'• '4, .,,,,,.,.,,,,,,,e,,iy4,..... , ....,..;.h,'v -,z,--7 ' ,,,,. Itu...,,,.. ; -- . -•."-.,,.'",1".%,",,,•.••,4,:.1. , '•••••,.. •••-•';1014•6' 1,4 \ • ,:.) 14424s- "" 4.. .... 0...,'•.I,?'';,4..4 ', -$,...• 4 ' , Ff.,,Aitie . •:,1-,, -.- ,,,,, V \ ,, 1541;,;;•' ' . r, '' iv'- .---..,,,,,,--1 -: ''1 --2: '''., r ''.•;';''''1 i .. „- ,<;., -,r-_----- ,k i war. t;•. ; . ,..... .\1•i, moatwer, .i,... i,, , , ',,,''' ''.' 1 . ,..- , . ;•,• 0 '1, '.?.7Y..; 1 '.-:% , ,sk, -1, ,:;-...",,,,' -,.,, „.• ,1,.. *',: ' ' / ' .,'''''..:': , .p.4 1,g, Za" . •::.. , e.- e '' Y•i:',...r,.::,„., v.17-- ._. • . f./ .•! imegT,„,..;. 41,4, ' ... :-•. .i.; '0 . i .. . ''''''' •' - .,_--A• - , - ".--7--4•‘=:.-- -- .... .-. ' ' _, ...itsigeemso -' '''' ; ..,,r1 \ I , V , '' --r *1"- :; • ." ''' ,k 1'. 1- _ • ••,- fko4•• •-•:;- :'''---'7"r,•••-•-*' 'P'--..',A, l'Aftuir '' ' - ...it I ,.,.,.-ie.:'' „ ‘.4_„.... // 14. ..• •:•••4..4,, ,'..-7:•- ?Afei,•- 4:1 — "1 ,-., .• -....', ,=:;;Ai, - - ,• - •••..„-,_ rEoca.44e .I , aos P.J" *.4", ;,-.,., "Pi' '41i, .._ . ,.,. ... .., .. '1 ' , t_ ----,,--- , (,,, ( k. 405 Corridor Program 1%w/ Congestion Relief&Bus Rapid Transit Projects Cedar River Vicinity Charrette Solutions for Parks, Wells & Local Access Mission: To identify a balanced, mutually supported design concept for the 1-405 improvements in the study area that responds to the City of Renton's needs and the requirements of a regional corridor. Washington State City of Renton Department of'hansportatiana , ';tik: ' , * , 2:1';:, 1: .„‘„, July 11 — 14, 2005 ; "`' w �4)4 Mtri++ s nc '1 x. ��''�Y .aa e � �' 't' t '�--f�r'''� fie, � � ,'.. .� '' -� ,. .' Z .r 4 .: it . - � KF4 44. r: f . :'te k h -J,:e �x ffi '." -e� # sur t ` •,..,•;" ..' f' t . . . ___ . ,,2, a ... .--,. , , ,-- ., .,,,. ., ,, 4* ...7,,, ,,,-„,1-,.. A. ,,-..,..... . ,,-,,,,,k i..?. ' ' ' '''' ''''1 Y ' Participants Charrette Team 1-405 leadership Team Dave McNeal Kim Henry Park Planner(JGM) Russ Prior Stacy Trussler Wells and Aquifer(PGG) 1-55(Tukwila)to t--<,y)Project Leslie Betlach Manager Parks Director(Renton) Keith McGowan Lys Hornsby Environmental Manager Water&Utilities Director(Renton) Steve Quinn Contents Mike Stenhouse GEC Project Manager The 1-405 Corridor Program 1 Maintenance Service Director Allison Ray (Renton) Environntent.ai Manager The Charrette 3 Keith Woolley Transportation(Renton) The Challenge Defined 5 Andrew Laski 1-405 StaffiCharrotte Support Performance Criteria 9 Transportation(1-405 Team) Larry Kyle Marcia Wagoner t Art. ' Mar i 40er Evaluation&Refinement 11 Facilitator(PRR) Colleen Gent* Punrit. information The Solutions 16 City of Renton Leadership Karl Weetby Kathy Keolker-Wheeler ft. fFr Ana y,r; Manager Mayor Brian,Wilkinson Appendices Terri Briere F utrtir. If.itrrn.atrtsn bound separately City Council President Rose Fenton • Introduction Marcie Palmer Yukon to Renton Contract • Agenda Councilmember Mer'agt Gabe Don Persson Tony • Charrette kick-off notes ptjbllc information Councilmember • Mid-point notes Jahn OtattateM Jay Covington RtitAtxt to Bellevue Contract • Report out notes Chief Administrative Officer Mallettlef • Recommendations memo Dennis Culp Todd Markerts • Letter of concurrence Community Services Department (tic tnformation Administrator Alex Pietsch Jiro Jordan Economic Development Rextidd to Bellevue NEPA Manager Administrator Scott Outer Gregg Zimmerman Public Information Department of Public Works Matt Mentz Administrator Renton to Bellevue Designer Amy Oteese - City of Renton Staff Public Information T `" Sandra Meyer Brian Elrod Transportation Systems Director CSS Team = Nick Afzali Laura Smith Transportation Planning and Tukwila to Renton Structures Programming Manager Ted Hickey Fire Department View of existing(-405 corridor through fully Ray Sled g �� developed urban Renton;Renton City Hall City of Renton Water Services `�I0 at left. Cedar River Vicinity Charrette:July 11-14, 2005 The 1 -405 Corridor Program �trr+ Implementation Plan The I-405 Implementation Plan for the corridor will ultimately add up to two additional lanes in each direction from I-5 in Tukwila to I-5 in Lynnwood. It I ' � will include major transit system expansions supported by transit access and operational capital improvements to I-405.Among the improvements will be the implementation of a bus rapid transit(BRT) system, major park-and-ride I SNONOYISN CWNW expansions, arterial improvements and an aggressive transportation demand gNGCWN - - - - management program. The Implementation Plan will improve I-405 continuously from I-5 in Tukwila to •;-; tt K , u_ SR 522 in Bothell.The Implementation Plan's improvements will closely match : • The 1-405 Corridor Project Focus on Renton Nogio Threading highway improvements through a developed urban area is always a challenge,and in Renton that challenge is even greater.The area surrounding the I-405/SR 169 interchange lies over a sole-source aquifer that provides the City of Renton's drinking water. Along with wells on both sides of the freeway, Liberty Park,the city's oldest park, is located on west of the freeway and Cedar River Park with its new aquatic center abuts 1.405 on the east.The Cedar River, with its recreational trail,crosses beneath the freeway and the Burlington Northern Santa Fe railroad line that is pinched between liberty Park and the 1-405 travel lanes. The Renton Hill neighborhood, separated from the city center by I-405 and steep topography, has important residential and emergency access needs that must be met. City-owned office space that provides a current resource for business startups plus properties that offer economic redevelopment opportunities may also be affected by the transportation facility improvements. Liberty Park • r Stoneway Property 1-405 with Liberty Park and BNSF railroad " trestle over Cedar River Marco Property Renton lull A Charrette study area 2 Cedar River Vicinity Charrette:July 11-14, 2005 The Charrette Why a Charrette? WSDOT and the City of Renton have struggled to develop a solution that meets the transportation needs within the Renton section of the I-405 corridor while ensuring adequate access to Renton Hill, minimal affects to the city's aquifer and wells, and protection of the three parks in the project vicinity. The complexity of this design challenge and the length of time that had been devoted to trying to find an answer led the I-405 Team and the City of Renton to consider a different problem-solving method.The multiple responsibilities and different perspectives of WSDOT and the City of Renton, made it difficult to identify solutions. Though the process to date had secured some agreements, Mission project advancement needed a clear direction quickly in order to meet the To identify a balanced, mutually supported timeframe to secure possible future funding. WSDOT and the City of Renton design concept for the 1-405 improvements identified a charrette to create an excellent opportunity for success. The in the study area that responds to the City charrette would gather a team of experts who were familiar with the issue areas of Renton's needs and the requirements of to focus solely on identifying a balanced solution. By participants bringing a regional corridor. fresh but informed perspectives,devoting a week of time to understanding '1 others program needs, the complex relationships among the parks, wells 'transportation functions,and possible alternatives,the charrette approach Guiding Principles offered the opportunity to find what had been elusive — a mutually supported solution and design concept. • Continue to support 1-405 Renton to Bellevue improvements as a critical need within the Corridor. The Cedar River Vicinity Charrette • Commit to working to solve one The Cedar River Vicinity Charrette began with presentations from elected another's issues. officials, City of Renton leadership and WSDOT staff and consultants to provide • Jointly work to minimize impacts and a full picture of the needs and challenges.The charrette team experienced balance benefits for the betterment of the area first hand with a site visit while raising questions and engaging in the community. discussions about their observations.The second day began with individual observations of the prior day, followed by smaller groups working to identify the • Identify a project plan for regional functional requirements for various elements such as the wells and recreational funding decisions. facilities.With these requirements in place, the team began work on a master plan that responded to the functional requirements for the parks,protection of and other access to the wells facilities, the space for highway widening and interchange ramps,residential access and the relocated railroad.Work continued the following morning with added focus on the access requirements to Renton By early afternoon,the team had completed concepts for the parks master trend Renton Hill access that they felt responded to the challenges identified in the opening presentations on the first day.A presentation to the I-405 and City Solutions for Parks, Wells&Local Access 3 The Charrette of Renton_leadership confirmed that the charrette team had indeed identified a promising, balanced direction. With counsel from the Leadership Team's comments and suggestions,supported by technical work from the I-405 team to test concepts, the charrette team focused their work on finalizing the proposed solution and presentation materials.The final presentations, hosted by the City of Renton, were met with strong support. Objectives The I-405 Team engaged city staff, agency directors, project staff,designers and local consultants in a design charrette from July 11th to July 14th, 2005 to arrive at a solution regarding proposed I-405 improvements in Renton.The eight charrette team members were challenged to determine how to lessen or eliminate any effects to the City of Renton's parks, water and transportation systems due to the future expansion of I-405.The four-day design session provided the opportunity for participants to identify a shared solution that met the needs of the City of Renton, the planned improvements to I-405,and the local and regional communities. Charrette Stages Day 1: The Challenge Defined Leadership and the project team set the stage and defined the scope of the challenge. Participants examined the issues on the ground at an afternoon site tour and began to review the complex details and constraints. Day 2: Performance Criteria The charrette team worked to identify functional requirements for the wells, parks, neighborhood access and 1-405 and initiated development of a viable solution set. Day 3: Evaluation & Refinement Team members participated in a morning working session and prepared for the afternoon mid-point presentation of early options with feedback provided by City of Renton and WSDOT representatives. Day 4: The Solutions The team refined their proposed plans for meeting the charrette's objectives. They highlighted and supported the reasoning for the best solution for each issue in the final presentation to the Leadership Team. 4 Cedar River Vicinity Charrette:July 11— 14, 2005 The Challenge Defined Charrette facilitator,Marcia Wagoner, welcomed participants to the charrette a ,; kick-off on July 11, 2005. Participants included the charrette team,the mayor , and executive staff from the City of Renton and I-405 project staff and directors. w, In their opening remarks, all participants expressed the importance of finding a solution that responded to both the I-405 project and local needs. '. Introduction and Overview 4 , Charrette team members experience the study area while receiving background Stacy Trussler,I-405 Project Manager, noted the substantial and difficult work information from the project team on the completed to date and reviewed the challenge before the charrette team. Many Renton Avenue access to Renton Hill resources critical to the community of Renton lie in close proximity to the planned I-405 improvements.The SR 169/1-405 interchange lies atop a sole- source aquifer that provides the majority of the City of Renton's drinking water. The city's oldest public park,as well as a skate park,various wells,community center, treatment facilities and a new aquatic park all bound the existing I-405. The Cedar River, a critical natural and cultural resource, flows through this area. ove the river is the Renton Hill neighborhood, where important concerns "iiirb✓arding access for general purpose and emergency needs must be considered. „ . In addition, numerous utilities lie in the immediate project vicinity and future ��. development plans call for converting the nearby Narco property into an active park and sports facility. Ms.Trussler concluded that the charrette brought many great minds to the table to address these concerns and discover the best path „=r forward. 41.° Kim Henry, Chief Engineer for the I-405 project, added his thoughts regarding the complex issues the charrette participants faced. In the past,every time a new solution was evaluated, there was always a difficult trade-off. "Despite these challenges, I am optimistic this team has all the resources to arrive at the right solution," Mr. Henry concluded. The Challenge "I am confident everyone will be proud of the results Members of the Leadership Team from the City of Renton were invited to address the group and offer direction. Renton Mayor Kathy Keolker-Wheeler achieved by the charrette noted that this project is probably the most important project in the careers of th' "e sitting around the table. She emphasized the work must be accomplished team." Noon the budget, function efficiently and fit well within the community. It is a —Kathy Keolker-Wheeler complicated matter that warrants a creative approach. Renton Mayor Solutions for Parks, Welts&Local Access 5 The Challenge Defined - Jay Covington,Chief Administrative Officer, said effects to places like Ren " Y `"` Hill must be minimized while improving traffic conditions for the city and the region. He noted it is critical to city operations to work together to address ,` �< wells, parks and access. WSDOT and the City of Renton should be particularly t4r P �.� ��,� � � �� -:--;--- sensitive to impacted neighborhoods. �-' ,: 1-405 bounded by Liberty Park, city wells, Funding Considerations the BNSF railroad and Cedar River Park The I-405 Implementation Plan is estimated to cost$4.7 billion,although that cost may change as the 1-405 Team works with the regional funding group to define a fundable package.As development of the regional package moves forward, there is concern about pressure to trim down the scope and costs.To be successful in "There may not be an easy securing sufficient funding from the regional package,there must be a clear vision answer that solves all of and a supported plan. If WSDOT and the City of Renton reach agreement on a plan and act together in support,the opportunity for success in securing regional the concerns." funding for a complete project is enhanced. —Kim Henry Chief Engineer, 1-405 Project Discipline Overviews The City of Renton executive staff and I-405 project staff provided backgroun regarding the specific elements under consideration. Economic Development Alex Pietsch, Economic Development Administrator for the City of Renton, expressed the importance of balancing the needs of the I-405 neighbors with the need to get traffic through town. Key parcels that are important to the City for economic development are potentially affected by the I-405 improvements. There are already development plans for the Stoneway site, and the old city hall, the 200 Mill Building, is a city resource that helps to start up young companies in the community. It will be important to avoid effects to this facility as much as possible, including maintaining sufficient parking which is already stretched at this site.These challenges demand a balanced solution that meets the time and budget requirements of the project. Mr. Pietsch noted that, "My goal is to complete the I-405 improvements because of the benefits they will provide to 1 the community. Partnering E ns II t4110 ,`. Gregg Zimmerman, Department of Public Works Administrator for the City of Renton, highlighted the agreements agencies had already reached regarding The Cedar River pedestrian crossing the I-405 mainline,the I 405/SR 167 interchange, drainage for John's Creek below 1-405 void and the Springbrook wetland mitigation bank. He noted that even with these 6 Cedar River Vicinity Charrette:July 11—14, 2005 The Challenge Defined *Noy:omplishments,there were still tough challenges for the charrette team to address: • A second primary access point to Renton Hill to meet community needs. • Preserving the wells,achieving access, meeting the geological concerns, and possibly relocating the corrosion control facility. • The relocation of the Burlington Northern Santa Fe Railroad. • Effects to parks. • The flyover ramp from I-405 to SR 169 and the height of the ramp. "We need to work as a • The location of utilities in Cedar River Park and moving a utilities corridor. team to make sure these • A plan to obtain regional funding. Mr. Zimmerman suggested that the only way to evaluate and compromise on improvements will benefit these issues was to utilize a partnering approach. the public as much as the Parks needs of the agencies." The City of Renton Community Services Department Administrator, Dennis Culp, said that the team should go beyond mitigating effects to parks and —Terri Briere investigate opportunities to create a premier park complex. He reported the Renton Council President city recently received permission from the county for lighted soccer fields at the Narco property. Developers relay to city staff that the proximity of parks to neighborhoods is an important selling point and they should regard the parks as ,sset. He added that access to Cedar River Park needs to remain convenient. "ifethis time the proposed I-405 to SR 169 flyover is eye-level with the slides at the new aquatic center and could severely affect the quality of the aquatic park experience. Environmental Planning Process Allison Ray,I-405 Environmental Manager, said that the charette will address important issues that need to be resolved before the environmental process begins for the Renton Implementation Plan Environmental Assessment(EA). The EA is currently scheduled to start in January 2006 with a scoping meeting for agencies and tribes as well as the public. From an environmental perspective, a key aspect of the charrette is to record the basis for all the decisions that are The Cedar River at Cedar River Park made. When the I-405 Team applies for environmental permits,the team will need to document these design decisions,both those that are the preferred designs as well as those that were dismissed from further consideration.This information from the charrette will be instrumental in successfully completing . . , the permitting process. Cedar River as it passes under the BNSF loire railroad and 1-405 Solutions for Parks, Wells&Local Access 7 The Challenge Defined �� � �� Project Overview _* e and Issues Ross Fenton,Tukwila to Renton Contract Manager,addressed the proposed z improvements to 1-405 in the study area. Plans include completely rebuilding the SR 167 interchange south of the study area and adding two lanes to I-405 in each direction through the study area.These improvements will double the width 1405 and SR 169 off ramp adjacent to q of 1-405, requiring WSDOT to remove the two existing accesses at Renton Hill. Cedar River Park and city wells This widening limits the options for rebuilding the current accesses due to right- of-way and physical constraints that result in excessively steep grades. Proposed changes to accommodate the freeway widening may also affect parks and other Z s elements. Additional site considerations include emergency access to Renton Hill. Currently, there are two existing locked south-side hill access points that ''cist are opened when weather and emergency situations require them; but, these are otherwise closed to prevent neighborhood cut-through traffic. Also, south-side access doesn't provide the required emergency response times. c :am ,, r aE John Donatelli,Renton to Bellevue Contract Manager,discussed improvements to 6;/.. I-405 between SR 169 and the Cedar River. He described the domino effect that the y� proposed I-405 improvements have on issues in the surrounding area.Wells located A. on the east and west sides of the freeway are constraints on the I-405 alignment. NiaS N The future I-405 mainline alignment forces the relocation of the BNSF railroad Congestion in the area circled lead the approximately 50 feet west,which in turn,requires the relocation of the Houser proposal to cul-de-sac Houser Way q Way South bridge over the Cedar River. As the railroad is relocated west.Houser Way might have to be lowered to maintain the current access point into Cedar River Park. However, lowering Houser Way impacts required access to wells 1,2,and 3, which is used by service vehicles on a regular basis. On the east side of 1-405,in the Cedar River Park,a ramp alignment that avoids the well heads and water treatment facilities has been identified.However,this alignment limits access to the current corrosion control treatment facility. The SR 169 and Sunset Avenue intersection is frequently congested due to heavy left turn volumes to SR 169, the southbound ramp onto 1-405, traffic on Houser Way and the adjacent railroad crossing. Recent studies from a previous charrette have recommended turning Houser Way into a cul-de-sac to eliminate one of three closely spaced intersections.This would improve traffic operations ; between Sunset Avenue, SR 169, and Bronson Avenue, which many residents take to travel through town. Prior to adjourning the kick-off meeting, the charrette team was directed by the City of Renton leadership to look at all the options and present the benefits anr' Existing pedestrian bridge over the Cedar drawbacks of each alternative for their consideration. River with 1-405 overhead 8 Cedar River Vicinity Charrette:July 11- 14, 2005 Performance 'Criteria Pump & Wells Considerations LL The charrette team identified the following criteria for consideration prior to developing solutions for wells. In Cedar River Park, clearances are sufficient for tea. wells 8 and 9, treatment facilities and the corrosion control facility to function successfully in their current locations when the new off ramp is constructed. =-« : Modification is also required for well 9.There is logic in keeping them "` -141A*1.-- adjacent to I-405 and the off-ramp rather than using additional park property to accommodate a new location. In addition, there is concern about getting the same yield if new wells are drilled. • Wells 1,2 and 3 drive many of the site decisions for Liberty Park and they should only be relocated as a last resort.Access needs for the trucks,supplies and special equipment required to maintain function of the wells appears achievable though it may require reconfiguring the well house structure around the remaining Ross Fenton, Russ Prior and Mike well heads to compensate for the narrower adjacent roadway due to the I-405 Stenhouse discuss wells concerns expansion. !'ell & Corrosion Control Facility Access Needs Wells 1, 2 & 3, 8 & 9 Corrosion Control Facility • Daily maintenance—vans, 1'/2 ton flatbed(20') • Sodium hydroxide—70'tanker, 2 to 3 times per month • Chlorine(semi-monthly)&fluoride(monthly)—2 ton • Boom truck/crane—tank replacement flatbed(40') • Drill rig—Well maintenance/redevelopment(40') • Boom truck/crane—pull pump for replacement Wells & Utilities Needs Geohydrology Study Emergency Response/Spill Control Plan • Background/baseline on well yield,water quality Environmental Coordinator during • Evaluate reduced recharge Construction • Evaluate need for additional monitoring wells Design Considerations Utility Relocation Plan • Containment—spills and storm water, roadway and ponds • Relocate utilities out of 1-405 footprint (curbs,walls, liners) • • Provide casing for those that can't be relocated(Carco Road Spread footings—avoid aquifer penetration,location, no 24 inch?) footings in river Alternate location for 24 inch main on Houser Bridge • Borings—no mud rotary, properly seal with>_30%solids Railroad Bridge?) bentonite Nome • Protect 100-foot sanitary control radius Groundwater Monitoring Plan Solutions for Parks, Wells&Local Access 9 Performance Criteria Parks Considerations L - Participants determined functional and design considerations for the parks in the project vicinity.The three park properties should be integrated into a whole. =- - 's" Current central parking needs to remain in the scheme with added parking at _. ,yr-' '.. the Narco property connected by a trail to Cedar River Park. Bronson Avenue «`i '` at Garden Avenue is the best choice for LibertyPark access if Houser Way is closed.Constructing a new access point off of Bronson Avenue at Garden Avenue Charrette team at work requires relocating the impacted ball fields,possibly to the Stoneway property if it is acquired. Amoninewimmensims Functional Considerations v • Access is required from Liberty Park on Cedar River Park to the Narco E _�y/ �:.. - property. y} L , A..i-'.< • The aquatic center plans to double in �� mat ,,_,,. .,....1-- size in the future. ( '' • For the Cedar River Trail to pass 0 beneath 1-405 it must meet theI a ' necessary height restrictions for it to 1 /w pass above the river and below Renton .;_.- Avenue. istr • The pedestrian bridge creates conflict ,.,.. with the community center and prevents -- - access between the parks. ` - •� - •'�f • • The historic community building is I •', ffi sited on current meadow site. ---;.- I • A green belt along the river is desired. • Trail at well house needs to accommodate service vehicles. • Lengthen railroad bridge to open up visual and pedestrian trail connection 1 between Liberty Park and Cedar River ,' ,�; ,«,er 11 , - - Park. i c,d 1 6 • The marketing of high-end mixed usesll , for both Stoneway and South Lake .fie„�„{a 44.4 ,,,, ' f ` Washington. alN_p.m.-e. .t.` ` • Some potential soil contamination 40 x+d N.A. concerns at Stoneway site. • r.r um-1414r- _ . k ± -. N Sketch focusing on pedestrian routes through Liberty and Cedar River parks and along the Cedar River *id 10 Cedar River Vicinity Charrette:July 11-14,2005 Evaluation & Refinement w Key Elements of the Parks Proposal At the mid-point presentation, the charrette team presented their initial design concept for the Leadership Team's consideration and feedback. More information regarding evaluated elements is included in the appendix. Parks Proposal Highlights • Evaluate Liberty Park, Cedar River Park and the proposed park facilities on the Narco property collectively. • Consider relocating the Liberty Park ball fields and creating a large playfield in the center of the park. • Move the skate park next to the new teen center to address the loss of"drive-by" supervision previously provided from Houser Way. • Relocate the Liberty Park baseball stadium to allow space for the proposed relocated park entrance at Garden Avenue and eliminate the need for Houser Way access. • Remove Houser Way to allow for additional parking for the former city hall and space for an access road or trail. • Relocate the existing pedestrian bridge beneath 1-405 to create a continuous route for the Cedar River Trail. * ,fie- ,res �aw Oil � } � — J i alb t ,xs `�`` „,. .7...---.-- -- -- - �y�,,:. % a � ` �� .. 'VII i * ` . ' ---3 ,,oar ,"°`�, .cG: .00031 EN 4 i t }Af. d! PA+rJ � f. ....– 5x1„^ S I + AaG4 � < "fl{; VD /F ,,YIaag,A1R4 � art ` d ,‘ v.:" -c 1 +. M TS S • Y '* M ift limior Sketch of possible parks layout and pedestrian routes Solutions for Parks, Wells&Local Access 11 Evaluation&Refinement • Provide service vehicle access to the community center in Cedar River Park thrc,1004 the existing parking lot. • Convert the open space between the aquatic center and 1-405 northbound exit ramp into an activity meadow. • Realign the merge location of SR 169 to move the flyover rampfurther awayfrom the Yaquatic center to improve the aesthetics and function of the center. • Build a new bridge to provide vehicle, bicycle and pedestrian access between Narco property and Cedar River Park. Evaluation of the Park Proposal The following is the charrette team's comparison of their proposed design concept to existing conditions. Parks proposal presentation of concepts Cedar River Park with Stoneway Parcel and evaluation by Dave McNeal Plus • Maintains existing wells • Maintains two access points to park • Provides access for chemical delivery • Stoneway acquisition allows for • Adjusts SR 169 flyover ramp potential relocation of ball fields alignment for improved park and • Improves visual and pedestrian aquatic center access,function, and connection between Liberty Park and aesthetics Cedar River Park • Added flexibility in the locating the • Community center, theater and aqua is touchdown for the 1-405 to SR 169 center remain flyover ramp • Relocated signalized access from • Improved trail connectivity and SR 169 access to Narco property with a new pedestrian and vehicle bridge • Relocated existing pedestrian bridge to enhance regional trail between • Enhanced aquifer protection/recharge Cedar River Park and Narco property with a new site provided at Stoneway • Increased revenue generation by Neutral combining programmed ball fields • • Improves greenway along river Modified parking configuration • Protects sensitive slopes along the Cedar River 12 Cedar River Vicinity Charrette:July 11— 14, 2005 • Evaluation&Refinement fir✓ Liberty Park Plus Neutral • Increased park area with removal of • One pedestrian bridge underneath Houser Way railroad bridge • Improved park access from Bronson • Relocated skate park Avenue at Garden Avenue • Relocated tennis, basketball, parking • Improved trail access and connectivity between Cedar River and Liberty • Maintains connection to library Parks • Improved picnic and play area relationship • Potential to increase tennis capacity • Large active meadow • Maintains existing wells and access • New teen center • Enhanced greenway along river Narco Property us • Enhancement along river at former bridge location(s) • Improves connection to Renton Hill • New access between Cedar and Narco properties Cedar River Park without Stoneway Parcel (Full 13+ Acres) Negative • Lost opportunity for three programmed ball fields at Stoneway parcel • Eliminated site for aquifer protection/ recharge • Shared access with any new development at Stoneway parcel Nitrrr►' Solutions for Parks, Wells&Local Access 13 Evaluation&Refinement Evaluation of Parks Proposal on Wells The concerns and potential risks of moving the wells outweigh any opportunities that the charrette team identified. Service access to the wells in Cedar River Park could be provided under the exit ramp alignment from I-405 northbound to SR 169. Plus Negative • Buildings for well 8 remain • Major modification of buildings for well 9 and wells 1,2, 3 Neutral • Further encroachment into sanitary control area • Access for chemical delivery truck • Access for daily maintenance • Difficult access to some underground utilities(water main in Narco Road) Key Elements of the Access Proposal Several schemes developed by the I-405 team were explored by the charrette team for access to Renton Hill. (See the appendix for descriptions of these access schemes) Of those schemes, Option C and Option Q showed the greatest promise to the charrette team. : ;/4 Lz- <..Cq T„.r, , --: Access Options - SPc,ciery. • Option C combines two existing routes by providing a crossing of 1-405 at Renton 'R �`` `Z` -=,-• Avenue with a connection to Main Avenue for primary access. • Option C requires additional access on the north side of Renton Hill or a new fire . station must be built on the south side. ` � "` ``` °" sl • Option Q provides desired connections and fire and emergency access with a stacked structure. E•,�1 c ' c-Z • Option Q minimizes effects on the Narco property. Renton Hill access considerations Direction from Leadership Team • Investigate moving railroad under I-405 • Continue with plans to remove Houser Bridge • Develop"no acquisition"option(if Stoneway parcel is not available) • Relocate Liberty Park baseball stadium • Keep moving forward and continue the outstanding efforts 14 Cedar River Vicinity Charrette:July 11—14,2005 • Evaluation&Refinement , „ .... %of , ,,-. ,-. , - 4,,-- --''• I.,, ',''''-::;17,1!'';',:ii.-'*i,, - ', , -,1 ..'',W . :-...---- p, 1 I , . -,1,,., -- -' , e.ir ,;--4.0,••t„.:.. ''''• • --,--- .•.' .-,C4.--• ! -t-.. 1 A'q i , -,; -.:,' --' ' '''' ,„ ' ''c''''''7‘ -;.',.. '• - .„,. , 41.-Zt"4.•;&'-5',. ,'-,^ ' _‘: :, --*-i" = • -','Ilt-, 4....'," . ,. _ ,,,,_‘'4';'-:11`..... ''4,..,,f.-.. ;,:..., ' "g` , '.,i' ';'' -k- , Y,:,,,,,,*.1-` —.,,„,, ,,, „4,':*."--*-- ,--.4.,A.,‘.. ', ' ,,-",- 2,"';',,:p„„, - -.f. ' '.- , t,,,* ',,, ,•,: ,-, , - ,-,- ,_,„, _ = .4.-, . - -=*- ,3; -,,: .4 ' .. , .-. 12'-'-.--': .,, - ' - _ , -•— :- e4-1,41 -.P'.,••-•,, rc:Ait"4:: ..::-..t,' ::,..-.4. ,-;---: - _ . * ------ 7..5.--',"-.." .,1,." _- ii ,- --i,„ ', '4',;-, ,;..,,,4.s.„& .,->---- • ,'7-; 1,,,,,k' t ,, ,'1--t .', ....-:* I i ' e „ojilf, -41,1,-w. ,, 2-2!",,,,,,""-,I',.,,.,4in, ''.. :',-,-.7.,'1',1". tc•_''.41:•*'i; ,i Development of proposal by charrette team *' 1 •.1-!-5‘ ), : - • ' . ' #.'i, ''''''trnitalt'-..,;;,‘,..,7 -, , .4,,,- it,- - • ;44;iii-ii; --ti ir-4-4,.. , ,r-i,,,,,-4,,,, Plan view of Renton Hill access Option Q1 with Mill Avenue structure shorter than Q option Op nat 0 "-if elj- ' '. , ,, '''' ( mo s,- , A- .1 .., Of '' ,, .--",iii,„. ., ,,,• -- , v- ', xr QM AVE *soorrei* / ,:: vi'i -''' -.* ,o.... //: ''' , ii ., ' ' --- /I • :,. ,/, - Y V ,.., . _ Plan view of Renton Hill access Option C with Option Q stacked structure - • 4-, % ' - — - Charrette mid-point presentation to City of Renton and WSDOT leadership 4ilaire 15 Solutions for Parks, Wells&Local Access .., . .._..,, , , ,. . .... . _ . ..„ .,:,;. - •: . "'.-.-.-- ---•.".: -.-•-... ..,,,! ....,._„......,...,...„....„.„....::::..:.............„...,„:......„.„..,:..,,,,,..,..,, ,,„,-...,..„„.....„.„,-,,,,..„,„„2,,„„.:,...,,...„ The . . „,„ ., . ,..„,,,,, . ..„-,.-...: „...,..„,,..... . ,, ,... ,_ .:. : , , , ,, „ _ „„ . ' _ k...., ., , ........4.. ,� ,...,,,,,, _ _ , , ... ..,.. _ ..„......„ . . , . .. „, ;sit. „, ..„---,---- , , - ! ,„,„, ,... ... :,... , . , . ..a„„c.,.,, ., , , . _ . . . _ ..... . .,,,._ .,,,, ....,..._ r fi .„ .. , ,. :v.4;;4:171411f.i.:':-.----474.41:-: ''.f.',Idrsi'- ' - '1`` '` _ 42 ii,,i..-„..„...- ,..,,-.,-,.,.,,,„.,,,,',;.?,_ ' ...._.- : ;,1;•:';',:„_::-,,-3,' "..7-,,,,,-40-: -,,"•,;'- S^d-t ' r '°q • - ...,. r. „�'.- ;I.k ate- - ..` v - ..Y - f-A r ;.g t _ idk •T . . - _ . :� -$i - - Y w �t C" _ 1-A01, 4,04003' ,_ . ` � � ' ry1'�� ` f k Sketch combining parks, wells and Renton Hill access design as developed by the charrette team ''j,, 54:*. 6 Cedar River Vicinity Charrette:July 11— 14, 2005 • loe . LEW , 6t4441-11V1r-.-„'„ . ittOtrie,) ti fhltKINA -.2-,.../ 1" ' --1-44,., '-• 4 ‘i . , _ .,... , - -•,,-.--.:-.---0- - '..' - -i•:' ' $.- ,-Xl-F:i.•=1::',,,,:i:;.?1,‘.-':,t\-, ' -:.',-„,,,-iii,-;. -„,,.04.''', r ,44# __,_.„,...,-i• " , .- „. • ,..,...1,y, 31,,,,....- , ‹.,..., - ...„4-_,,,,,i.„•:•.q,-,;,,f,,,,-., . . . . ._, if- '-•,_..',),?4,'-•--- -.„-,:f.... ,. . ',-' -. •,...:274,,,,,,e-•. • . ,.:.. ‘-'---.:•'„5.--,•-' ' - -:.•,.i,,'• .: - . , , ‘ , • .•..,,,,,-. , , c- lousle , ' ,-,-,i4*--- - . ' ' k• - - 14 '2•-f'''--, .- - . •-: 4: .,--- . .,• .- ------ -4447.07- ecartircom , . ., . . .._ -- , . :- _. ..--44,... ' ,-,... .....-..-'--0•-.:444-40,7,4-ti--.-...,f r r .144m4 , ..„ ,. -• - , ,.„-• -4.- ...,-.....,--,-,!--'.-- ., -4,--, ...,,,-0•,----,,,,,.,.4.,•,..,';.:v.:•.,,,,S'2'! . " : :,.,,,V,4„2-27------ --- •'.._ „; ' .,.,viti .,..5 --: IX I ', :N. -. . .- ,......:-:2-- --*,A.-,'f.-' ''''Ir ' .`,2 ...'- ''' - ' ' 4.- ir .. , . . . . '''.• '2:t '''' : i........... ..,„.;., 2' ,‘''',4, / ...'...!,*41,4 ' 1 ,"N''t `' -'.'' 4,-,_-:.,:;,„-.--:f-' ' .4.' •-',47• ',1_'' '.4 .,.• --.' :430,0,4 t ,- ,.',..,. ... r ---,-- '- . -.. .:...---„... ----....4...., , A,11. ,.... r V .:. ,...r ..,:':"'-ir.'.1.,..f- 40140...e/XII •, ,'-..? ' t, .. .4,-• ;1 __ Solutions for Parks, Wells&Local Access 17 The Solutions - Important community resources are located within the vicinity of the planned Parks Solutions at a Glance I-405 freeway expansion near the Cedar River in Renton. WSDOT and • Integrate Liberty Park, Cedar River the City of Renton needed to find a solution in order to move forward with Park and Narco property. improvements to I-405 while addressing any effects to parks, wells and • Provide primary entrance in Liberty local access,especially Renton Hill access.The charrette team was brought Park at Garden Avenue and Bronson Avenue. together to critically examine these impacts and develop a design concept that • Remove existing Houser Bridge. balances community benefits and project needs.The following are the solutions • Create a new pedestrian bridge to link developed by the charrette team. the trail between Cedar River Park and Narco property. • Aquire Stoneway property. Parks & ells Solutions • Remove ball fields and stadium from Liberty Park and relocate at Stoneway property. Create strong connections between Liberty Park, Cedar River Park, the • Expand existing Parks Department undeveloped Narco site and the Cedar River Trail to produce the feel of building at Liberty Park to allow for a new teen center. one large park complex.The Cedar River Trail and the parks have existed • Relocate skate park next to public there for some time as seemingly separate facilities,and the trail appears street. to disconnect under the railroad where it currently crosses the Cedar River. • Keep theater, community center, Redeveloping the parks and the trail will allow the city to integrate them more aquatic center and existing parking at Cedar River Park. effectively.The Narco property is a hidden treasure that will become a great • Convert multi-use field at Cedar River resource to the City of Renton.The design concept assumed development of the Park into a general purpose meadow Narco site with sports fields and acquisition of the Stoneway property. to allow for future expansion of the aquatic center. • Move the 1-405 and SR 169 flyover Close off Houser Way south of the Cedar River and provide a signal and ramp to the median to provide pedestrian crossing at Garden Avenue and Bronson Avenue to create separation from water slides at the aquatic park. a new access point to Liberty Park.Offering access at this point would • Open up existing berm under require removal of the old oak trees in that location,but given the long-term the railroad to provide visual and benefits of improved park access, it is more important to provide a primary pedestrian connection between Liberty and Cedar River parks. park entrance. Relocating the park entrance impairs the existing stadium ball park,but creates an opportunity to develop Liberty Park with recreational features more in alignment with adjacent neighborhoods. Since Houser Way is eliminated,the Houser Bridge is no longer required and is removed in this plan. In addition,the railroad bridge is relocated to the abandoned Houser Way. With the reconstruction of the railroad bridge, there is an opportunity to remove the barrier created by the existing railroad bridge, increase the length of the bridge and eliminate the berm. By removing the railroad berm and replacing it with a bridge structure,the more open trail could be created between the two parks. A new pedestrian bridge connecting the Cedar River Trail and parks will replace the pedestrian bridge that currently crosses the Cedar River beneath 1-405. Relocating the bridge also provides an opportunity to keep the Cedar River Trail as continuous as possible. For trail users to be directed arounyj' the community center event lawn, which functionally requires separation from pedestrian traffic, the trail is realigned to direct pedestrians around the event 18 Cedar River Vicinity Charrette:July 11—14, 2005 The Solutions Winter and into Cedar River Park or the Cedar River Trail on the opposite bank. In Liberty Park, the trail would be realigned to separate the picnic and play area from the trail traffic. The main pedestrian through traffic will cross the bridge to the Narco site and continue the Cedar River Trail. Cedar River Park users can continue to the park facilities. As a way of providing a second park access point, construct a new vehicular bridge with sidewalks to Narco to link access to Renton Hill and Narco property. The former ball fields at Liberty Park will be converted into a meadow and the tennis courts relocated to the former stadium location. The decision to relocate active field sports out of this park appears to produce the most beneficial use of opportunities at Liberty Park when considered in combination with the adjacent park resources.The facilities moved from Liberty Park could be replaced by converting part of the Stoneway site into ball fields. If the Stoneway property is not acquired,then it could mean losing the ball field from this site. With the closure of Houser Way south of the Cedar River,the skate park location becomes somewhat isolated from view.Therefore,the skate park facility is moved closer to an area that can be monitored more effectively.The new location is ,:cent to Bronson Avenue next to the proposed future teen center in Liberty Iliark. In addition, if Houser Way were is turned into a cul-de-sac,the existing area south of the river where Houser Street is located could be incorporated into additional parking which the city desires for the old city hall building. In Cedar River Park, the design concept retains the existing theater,community center and aquatic center. To provide for a possible expansion of the aquatic center, the baseball field and soccer meadow between the aquatic park and I-405 exit ramp are converted into a general purpose meadow. The parking lot at the site remains in its current formation and provides service access to the community center.A100-foot wide greenway is proposed along the river. Elimination of the entrance to Cedar River Park from Houser Way requires a new access, therefore a new vehicle and pedestrian bridge from the Narco property across the Cedar River is constructed to replace the lost access. A key advantage of acquiring the Stoneway property is added flexibility in locating the touchdown for the I-405 to SR 169 flyover ramp. It is less safe if the end of the flyover ramp occurs at a signalized entrance to the park and SR 169 intersection, so the ramp is proposed to touchdown beyond the intersection. Next to the proposed flyover is a water slide and pool.The ramp as F ed would be about the height of the slide. Different ideas were evaluated t ?inimize effects to the park expericence. One option resulted in implications from moving the entire structure into the hillside. Instead,the preferred option Solutions for Parks, Wells&Local Access 19 le The Solutions Wells Solutions at a Glance would move the ramp out of the immediate proximity of the aquatic center, • All existing well heads are maintained. as far as 50 feet to the north of its originally proposed location,and into the • Add gated service route along BNSF middle of the future roadway alignment. By moving the taller element of the right of way to provide access to wells flyover further back from the slide it creates a buffer to reduce visual and noise 1,2and3. • Provide service route under proposed distractions. exit ramp from northbound 1-405 to SR 169. In Cedar River Park, service vehicles could approach the well house(s) via • Utilize park paths as emergency a gated service path proposed along the east side of the I-405 right of way. access routes. • Route trucks with chemicals to enter Adjustments to the well house for well 9 are needed to provide overhead access facilities from SR 169(limited access for pulling pumps. Service vehicles exiting the wells facility and treatment driveway)and exit empty through facility would go under the proposed I-405 northbound exit ramp alignment River Park. • Make structural major modifications to at SR 169.Trucks could off-load chemicals and then exit through the park via the building for wells 1,2, 3 and 9. the parking lot and access road, which also provides service and emergency 11 ",., r .. I, ots - 'I.„ '1 00494K ,---_--.. \togfr -,r- ` „ - `+ "ons` 7, a , P77 #Cy- a c r . 1 --v: ib OM* 4...sr Hu, _t „ mai '�3` T .3 - 3. Y V. ilia R # cF444 es""'. ' 1 x Sketch of parks layout Niiiiid 20 Cedar River Vicinity Charrette:July 11- 14, 2005 • The Solutions ..ehicles access to the back of the community center. If needed, hardened paths throughout the park could serve as emergency access routes including access to the drinking water fluoridation facility. In Liberty Park, an access path next to the realigned railroad could provide access to wells 1, 2 and 3 for large maintenance trucks. Major modifications of the well house for wells 1,2 and 3 will be required to provide service access as a result of the narrower adjacent roadway due to the I-405 expansion. It will be necessary to maintain or replace the two water lines that are currently on the Houser Way Bridge. >;. .:« r= EXIBTIN GI PROPOSAL a crkw4 Lecema wcar TM,,.14.in.cuneR w . OPTION•1 r IOPTION-2 - .• - -._. _ Sketch of Cedar River aquatic park and southbound 1-405 to southbound SR 169 ramp options :rte -, -- s a , , t£ 1 4 i - --- ;i ,i. r 7- Alternative park access if Stoneway property is not lOtteited 'erre Solutions for Parks, Wells&Local Access 21 The Solutions Renton Hill Access Solutions In order to provide two access points to Renton Hill,Option Q(Cedar to Narco property)and Option C(Renton Avenue to Main Avenue) are proposed solutions. Option Q utilizes the existing Mill Avenue right-of-way and provides access from a lowered Mill Avenue on Renton Hill down along the southeast side of I-405 into the Narco property, under I-405 to the existing Narco property access road, then to the existing intersection with Houser Way and Mill Avenue.An "upper"3rd Access Solutions at a Glance Street—commonly referred to as Mill Avenue—is constructed over the"lower" • Preferred solution is Option Q in Mill Avenue to provide access to Renton Hill homes located off of Mill Avenue combination with Option C. and to maintain local Renton Hill circulation between Renton Avenue and Cedar • Option Q utilizes space under the Avenue on the north side of the hill. Between "upper"and "lower" Mill Avenues, existing Mill Avenue. uPp • Mill Avenue descends at the 4th Street a 14-foot vertical clearance is required to allow emergency response vehicles. and Mill Avenue interchange and ends At the 4th Street and Mill Avenue intersection,Option Q utilizes space under at the Narco property. the existing Mill Avenue.The new homes that front Mill Avenue would continue • Residents on Mill Avenue have access to have access from"upper"Mill Avenue with"lower"Mill Avenue beneath it to their homes from the"Upper"Mill Avenue. providing access to the park and the connection under I-405.The stacked structure • "Lower"Mill Avenue provides access is open on the side facing I-405. to the park and to the existing Mill Avenue and Houser Way intersection with the connection under 1-405. Option Q has minor effects on the Narco property and provides long-desired vehicle access between Renton Hill and the city's three riverside parks. Durin' construction, four homes on Renton Hill fronting Mill Avenue will have temporary restricted access. Option Q requires utility relocation. Estimated construction costs are comparable with other options that were developed. Pedestrians will be provided with a trail on "upper"Mill Avenue to the Narco property and Cedar River Trail since there are no pedestrian facilities on "lower" Mill Avenue. Overall,this option has minor effects to residential areas and "Upper"Mill Avenue ,r • gid r + 2- 'Lower'Mill Avenue Perspective of Renton Hill access Option C with Option Q structure Computer-generated model of access solution as developed by sketched in black the charrette team 22 Cedar River Vicinity Charrette:July 11—14, 2005 N • >. The Solutions r 1 - I 0.e4 I •" + - .:,'''..;',$;:! !,i i %,, i • ,,..A. -oz, 1'4 , 't.1.1- :- .:- . I .": ',-;.:,. `-'-‘, vo3; - .-.4,' :• • ",-:1 `t.' 1 I 14111:1. _i I ':'- '75., -',,, : - '4*- ' •-'''-''- 44 .._salto......7.4 1 I I n Existing access to Renton' - &;:.. Hill Existing typical section at proposed Renton Hill access 5 . , ., '';',".4 -te-*:'''''''' -' ''''-',L•mf.,..4,..--- ..,. 7:‘,40-..... ,t--...;.-1:-..,- - - ---2.,, ...i,.4 ,-, ;..., ,, . .. .',.:'-...:- '.-,--- ,::,----i- , '.--..-- -.- --.$, , .. , - .-L x-4'' .-VA‘'''''" .-,-Iti ''•-'*.t-',7-''''' .!.,1 ;'1. , . ,n,,,-Ir."--3.t.'..'-" ',,-:- -'-' 't. ,,,,,,3,''-: 0,.,7, .,„?. - ... 2}-,-N,-- , .L.14.*: ‘ -:•.' --`, s '7 f4, '='' • " ' 2:-,‘- ''''' -4-':fkif.:4':-.'.'7.i.:-.'` ' , '4'0,,--':,%.1,,,' „,' ' - ,--' , `'-'"?t'' '- '''' •.• ' ,j- e.,'-'''''','",''',...: 4,,,'..,-4-7-:-4=' ,:-.'„'.',,.. •Ai-r,:". .:4„ -1-e-1''-i- _•,- '- , 'i'- ,-,:,-. %,-,, •,-.,,; - V - .,;,;;7. ,?•,...; --- ,..- '=14400- <fr' ''T , ";;Alti -At., -- -- ,. .- 7," -,,,.--- 4.., „—xr....-- ....:4,--,?- -,. --.. - 4' . .„... ''1..2'-,--- ,-3. - ,‘.....,--, ',-,..v,-4— -.0*- -2" ...., - ......t ,...,..z.,.-.,-,, -,*....„...,.. ?.. , c.1 -4 - nette;-:'* -*,..''' ... _ ,-r- va „.,,,a'''''-; • ' ' ''`. V x-,— • .4IrT VS ,j , t,:400 vgoe -• :t- to' .. .)071'- .,-- 2 -, ' *:?.":.; , .1111i0,. "' .*0. ":i‘-1-.:rte''?1/4- v,,?'";' :;''\ '' '': ''.!'""*041P;r. .'' '' ' ,0***44*' 4altiese-1,::'S ' .y,:-•' . , 4...„, - il:'-- , ',', . - - ;, ,.--4-;:1..,--Ir ..,,,,... ..i.,-110k.f.:,:z.--.:;: • '.-.;' * - ':' f44.4,---'''' -'-'. . --1...,2! ---,4-,'''' ' • ' -0-- ' '-" ,, ,- . V ." - 0 '' ;''''-" „..... ' ,fr -, ' . -0 _ _ , , „,,„ ,., 1 "'''''''' ' ---1 1 NZ * ''' , ii. .F..': ?'' " . ,. .„...,.. .'''ff .„ „ ..... .. ''''''''' ki. '• . ::"'*''' 4,11t*'-' '''.' ' ' '-'' . . S. , . ., . - . . - . , . . . - . _ A * - 4 . - .- -' • ,... ' ' -•.. ' . -' Ph '-simulation showing access solution as developed by the charrette team 23 Solutions for Parks Walls&Local Access , The Solutions businesses,does not accomodate cut-through traffic,and will meet required f *`' , emergency response times. t , Leadership Team Response ` - -4,..' � a ,f The Leadership Team was impressed with the results of the group's efforts and '"" believed the charrette team solved many difficult issues, while improving future conditions for residents and parks. In particular,those attending the presentation Final presentation were pleased that the design concept included siting the SR 169 flyover ramp at the center median, providing two access points to Renton Hill,meeting the needs for improvements to I-405,reprogramming the parks complex and "The charrette team has maintaining access to wells 1, 2 and 3. done a wonderful job As a next step,the charrette team will brief the Renton council, mayor and residents with the results of the charrette. and displayed a lot of ingenuity." —Don Persson Renton City Councilmember "After the number of years we have battled these issues, the final concept looks amazing and there are so many positives." —Marci Palmer Renton City Councilmember 24 Cedar River Vicinity Charrette:July 11—14, 2005 "�rrr 'fir• Appendices bound separately • Introduction • Agenda • Charrette kick-off notes • Mid-point notes • Report out notes • Recommendations memo • Letter of concurrence .„,.. . ,, . - . . .. . _ ... _ . . . _ 1 ! •'-'''''• ` - - 1-- ' - - '1--- ' '-'' ' ' - - I*. :.-4;47.61:71e1 ,, •„ • P.. '.j.•:',.:: \‘ ^..;',,-.:,,,k '1,,..,,,,,„ ,.....,,,..;,,,,,,,,,^,. _41;,:,•., ,.. sf,-..;,..-,.„-. ,,.:::,-: . , , . osboxlitt er' --__''''''Alt•tr*. -,....,,,41t.. --,..e" ..rt , —4''''''' '",n.' \ . . . ,. , .... . ., , .. o. . . ', .4.r.'.. - 44 .,. „/ ‘"$4., ',"7 ' ' •,,!:4 All -,,-„, ,, -'''".i i li ,.',,::!:;1,1';,1:..'",;..'„, ,7 ;.',-t',;"":,;';'...•.i', . , ,ft ' ii,*•:,..''''' loglitet*i r t, ,.-:rk 4, ...:,;.... -i'-so4',.L,..v-..4a1,—i .-4.4. ' .,',„,.,,'''''''''711..,4'".,.\-'r,--"'.",--,'4,4„'';2..-.'''••••1--4,,'.-'rt-Ef',''0m.',„,,''' ''.'',i',•,••'-:''.',:''''',':'',,:'14:•,,..,-2,•,'11,i'''-r,,rf:....„;T?,--'':.':..,.......1-.-':',,1,.,\:,::,„..-.,„,,,,,.,„,.,,-.-..;-';,.:,,.,..,,.•-.,:.....,.,,'..'•...:,'..,:-':,..:,,,,:,'.',.„',...,,.',''.,'-.,”'-,:,,,.'-', -. :\ 7 .( ,, . - . ,. ,, If ç cief,iihi..4V0 J.411151,•---// '', ' i , **Lir.4.P4,,,...:.:,.,'. ,',•' '• ,., "- ,- -,-, ' _,,...tc,!....„-:.:,..::,.....:.i_:_,.. ..z..7,7:„...;,,,... ...,.....,..-.., :tit.,-4,1,-...44;„g7.,,...„0.0,,r,,g0,...„„..,,,r.,... .. e3g,•,--''-.,•',.;,•-•:•••,--,..—•-.-„'---,(••t% i • li .i,,:,•,,•‘‘;•.---.1,r!.77 .z-;....'-'•••,,,.'-',.''.:.:'.-:'...,,,,':',...-..1::- :.':',' ',-'•-''''.'-:—.‘' -'-':.;'-'4i'i'''' ",':','''''..., '''.',., ',`,.4c4,'',---\ '4;,,,,:-','''',, --' ,',.....,,, iip'-'''''''-''''-. - — —:7 •,'-•4`..- • .,..., ...... . . , • *tlisIVW '0 ''''''''....;,' :,,„ •-y,„!'''' 4. 1 ..''','", , '-• .„‘, ..... ,e N 4.;,. , .4......• .i., • --,.. _, •,,,:„ .„. , . .- .,•,, „, . ., . / . ,. . ,. - .. , .-'e;_5' 1:._.'..4;i ,,,,,,-.., ,- - / ' ' '''•,;• ,,- -- *WSW. ' ', ',.. 4,r , , ...,_ Olt* ,., 4 1,. 0i*0,,I...`.' . ' I'l it* '• \ , ,„., ' 40 '• '''' ;•-ttt-----,,—* , ''''''.- 1 V -,-!.'1..; 4-!-; ' '."-•—:-4;,4.-- .estjf,joi .-, looki „!,-j040r,?•' . ,'.,,-.:. ' .--'-. I.'. - . I --'-f"-4.61......41tivot.--,'''_, ..--' , .,-,. - :',. 1 „ . ,... ,. ) CITY OF RENTON COUNCIL AGENDA BILL AI#: Submitting Data: Planning/Building/Public Works Dept. For Agenda of: Dept/Div/Board.. Transportation Systems Division August 7, 2006 Staff Contact Sharon Griffin,Transportation Program Agenda Status: Development Coordinator, ext. 7232 Consent Subject: Public Hearing X Correspondence 2007-2012 Six-Year Transportation Improvement Program Ordinance (TIP) and Arterial Street Plan Update Resolution X Old Business Exhibits: New Business Issue Paper Study Sessions Resolution 2007-2012 TIP Changes from Previous TIP Information 2007-2012 Six-Year TIP Summary with Attachment Draft 2007-2012 TIP including Project Map (Exhibit A) Other and Map Index(Exhibit B)within the document Interlocal Arterial Street Plan(Exhibit C) Recommended Action: Approvals: Noe Refer to Transportation Committee and set Legal Dept X Public Hearing date of August 21,2006 Finance Dept....... X Fiscal Impact: Expenditure Required N/A Transfer/Amendment Amount Budgeted Revenue Generated Summary of Action: The City is required by law to annually review and adopt by resolution the 2007-2012 Six-Year Transportation Improvement Program (TIP). In conjunction with this, the Arterial Street Plan is also updated. The proposed TIP includes five new projects: Intersection Safety and Mobility, Ripley Lane North, Garden Avenue Widening, South 3rd Street/Shattuck Avenue Intersection(new grant award), and Benson Road South/South 31St Street. Five new grant awards have been incorporated into existing project line items. Three completed projects were dropped from the program and a fourth project was incorporated into an existing project. Staff Recommendations: Council adopt: 1)the annual updates to the Six-Year Transportation Improvement Program; 2)the Arterial Street Plan; and 3) set August 21, 2006, as the public hearing on the TIP. Staff further recommends that the resolution regarding this matter be presented for reading and adoption. H:Trans/planning/sgriffinlrlPs/2007_TIP_agendabill A �ti`sY 0� PLANNINGBUILDING/ PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT MEMORANDUM DATE: August 7, 2006 TO: Randy Corman, Council President Members of the Renton City Council VIA: i Kathy Keolker, Mayo FROM: ° Gregg Zimmermak ministrator STAFF CONTACT: Sharon Griffin, Transportation Program Development Coordinator, x7232 SUBJECT: 2007-2012 Six-Year Transportation Improvement Program (TIP) and Arterial Street Plan Update ISSUE: Should the City Council approve the resolution adopting the 2007-2012 Six-Year Transportation Improvement Program (TIP)? `herr RECOMMENDATION: Council adopt: 1)the annual updates to the 2007-2012 Six-Year Transportation Improvement Program; 2) the Arterial Street Plan; and 3) set August 21, 2006 as the public hearing on the TIP. Staff further recommends that the resolution regarding this matter be presented for reading and adoption. BACKGROUND: The City is required by law to annually review and adopt by resolution the Six-Year Transportation Improvement Program (TIP). The draft TIP is presented to the Transportation Committee and distributed to the rest of the Councilmembers for review in advance of the public hearing. In addition to the projected revenues and expenditures for the future six years, the TIP also includes current-year project allocations and past project expenditures. The City Council adopted the previous Six-Year TIP—2006 through 2011, on August 1, 2005, as a planning document for the next six years. It was distributed to the Puget Sound Regional Council, the Washington State Department of Transportation, Randy Corman,Council President Members of the Renton City Council August 7,2006 Page 2 of 4 King County Department of Transportation, the Association of Washington Cities, Puget Sound Energy, surrounding local agencies,the library, and to internal departments. The proposed TIP includes five new projects: Intersection Safety&Mobility Program, Ripley Lane North, Garden Avenue North widening, South 3rd Street/Shattuck Avenue Intersection, and Benson Road South/South 31St Street. Four completed or modified projects were dropped from the program. A spreadsheet("2007-2012 Six-Year TIP Summary") is attached which outlines the expected revenues and expenditures for the six-year period. The six-year estimated expenditures were balanced to fall within the expected revenues, leaving a balance of $0 on December 31, 2012, for the combined Fund 317 and Fund 305. If the programmed expenditures follow the schedule, it is likely that the Fund 317 fund balance will be depleted by December 2009. For the second year in a row, the proposed six-year program required under funding some future projects at this time to achieve the successful completion of other newly funded projects. • Required funding levels for some of the newly funded projects were determined by the receipt of funding from outside sources that required City match: o #3 Strander Boulevard/SW 27th St, Phase 2, Segment 2a - State and *4011 federal funds. This project is slated to receive $4,600,000 of federal Surface Transportation Program (STP) Regional funds to fund construction of the embankment and relocation of the railroad tracks. o #8 Rainier Avenue—S 4th PI to S 2'1 - Sound Transit and new state funds for Pedestrian and Bicycle Safety grant of$200,000. o #9 Hardie Avenue SW Transit/Multi-modal - Sound Transit and new state funds for Pedestrian and Bicycle Safety grant in the amount of $150,000. In the previous TIP, the interlocal agreement between the City and Sound Transit was not completed. Therefore, the project was shown in 2009 through 2011. Due to the new Sound Transit commitment to these two projects (approximately$15 million) and the requirement to complete construction by December 2009, the City's match funds of$6,747,000 was moved to 2006 through 2009. o #21 May Creek Bridge Replacement-Due to a shortage of funds, City funds were removed from the construction at this time. Design will continue. Grant funds are expected in 2008 or 2009. We will re-evaluate next cycle. H:\Divisions\Transp\Planning\Sharon\TIPs\IP 2007 TIP Randy Corman,Council President Members of the Renton City Council August 7,2006 Page 3 of 4 "fir* o #29 South 3rd Street and Shattuck Avenue Intersection - Received a state Pedestrian and Bicycle Safety grant in the amount of$200,000. City match is expected to be $100,000. o #39 Bicycle Route Development Program/Lake Washington Trail Connection - Received two federal Enhancement grants: 1) $100,000 to develop and produce a bicycle map identifying a bicycle network with connections leading into and out of the city($20,000 city match); 2) $500,000 to design the Lake Washington (Sam Chastain) Trail Connection(no City match). A $900,000 construction grant for this project is pending and expected; Community Services is the lead on this project with assistance from the Transportation Division. • Some of the newly funded projects were determined by economic development needs: o #12 Ripley Lane North - $500,000 o #14 Garden Avenue North Widening- $1,000,000 • Some programs requested and continue to receive additional funding in the first three years because of elevated priority: 'o•r re o #1 Street Overlay Program o # 10 Walkway Program for preservation project • Some projects which may be delayed due to the above needs are: o #4 NE 3rd/4th Corridor- Limited funding has been allocated for match funds for grants or for one small intersection project along the corridor. • Some projects or programs will need funding to move forward: #11 Rainier Avenue—SW 7th to 4th PI railroad bridge - The City committed to 30% design with a re-evaluation of the escalated construction costs when the design was completed. The project has become tied to the Sound Transit Hardie Avenue project due to the raised bridge elevation on Rainier, requiring construction work in tandem. The Sound Transit project has a requirement to complete construction by December 2009 per the interlocal agreement. The total estimated cost of the Rainier Avenue Bridge project increased from $6,859,500 in the 2006-2011 TIP to a current estimate of$9,289,700 in the new 2007-2012 TIP. This is an increase of$2,430,200. Partial funding was programmed for this increase. However, there is still a shortfall of$2,057,800 to fully fund this project. The Transportation Division will seek cost savings throughout the TIP program, including grant resources to close this gap. H:\Divisions\Transp\Planning\Sharon\TIPs\IP 2007 TIP Randy Corman,Council President Members of the Renton City Council August 7,2006 Page 4 of 4 NIIIt11 Numerous projects and programs were under funded in the years 2010 through 2012. Ultimately, all projects in the TIP are presented to Council for review and approval, collectively during the budget process, and individually when approval is requested for design and construction contracts. Attachments cc: Peter Hahn,Deputy PBPW Administrator-Transportation Jim Seitz,Transportation Planning and Programming Supervisor Sharon Griffm,Transportation Program Development Coordinator Nenita Ching,PBPW Administrative Analyst Bang Parkinson,FIS/IS Supervisor Project File H:\Divisions\Transp\Planning\Sharon\TIPs\IP 2007 TIP 2007 - 2012 Six-Year TIP Summary Transportation Capital Improvement Fund Fund 317 (including Fund 305) 2007-2012 Item Budget Comment CAPITAL FUND 317 REVENUE: Business License Fee $ 9,600,000 At$1,600,000 per year.1 Transportation Grants 16,474,421 In-hand or reasonably expected. Miscellaneous 2 - Transfer in from Mitigation Fund 305 1 6,567,207 As shown below in Fund 305. Transfer in from Arterial Street Fund/Gas Tax 1 2,100,000 At$350,000 per year(Overlay Program). New Vehicle Fuel Tax 1 1,490,000 Varied annual amounts. Other In-Hand 25,104,700 Sound Transit, King County, etc. Bonds-2007-2012 9,461,286 Programmed funds for 2007-2012 only. Additional savings or reimbursements 2,203,508 See Attachment A"Additional Revenues" TOTAL NEW REVENUE $ 73,001,122 Use of prior year revenue for 2007-2012 program 5,169,746 Est. beginning fund balance Jan. 1, 2007. TOTAL RESOURCES $ 78,170,868 EXPENDITURES: 2007-2012 TIP projects(programmed as funded) 78,170,868 TOTAL PROGRAMMED EXPENDITURES $ 78,170,868 SUMMARY OF FUND 317: iRevenue 73,001,122 Expenditures (78,170,868) Prior Year Revenue Needed (5,169,746) More needed than is available. Budgeted fund balance, January 1, 2007 5,169,746 Total new revenue 73,001,122 Total programmed expenditures (78,170,868) Shown as funded. 317 Fund Balance, December 31, 2012 $ - No funds remain TRAFFIC MITIGATION FUND 305 Budgeted fund balance, January 1, 2007 2,471,407 Anticipated new revenue 2007-2012 1 3,600,000 Estimated at$600,000 per year.3 Partial mitigation from Landing stores 439,800 Approx. 80% of$549,800 estimate. Sidewalk mitigation 56,000 Current balance of new revenues. Total Committed Expenditures (6,567,207) Transfer to Fund 317 as shown above. 305 Fund Balance, December 31, 2012 $ - No funds remain TOTAL FUND BALANCE 317 & 305 4 - December 31, 2012 Some funds are estimated earlier than expected. v1iscellaneous funds include plan sales,service charges and penalties. 3 Dependent on development and credits. 4 This addresses ability to fund the overall program,not cash flow. 7/27/2006 Attachment A 2007 - 2012 Six-Year TIP Additional Revenues NIS Potential savings from 2006 projects RUSH $ 1,000 Rainier Corridor Study 4,000 South Renton Project 300,000 Projects on hold Project Dev. & Predesign 35,000 Staff&small contracts Arterial Circulation 60,000 Staff&small contracts GIS Needs 15,000 Grady Way Corridor 25,000 WSDOT Coordination 10,000 Arterial HOV 8,000 Park-Sunset Corridor 25,000 Lind Ave.-SW 16th to SW 43rd 5,000 S Carr Rd/Mill Ave. S 3,000 Sub-total $ 491,000 Reimbursement of funds from various sources Street vacation reimbursement $ 350,975 2000-2005 4th/Burnett reimbursement 178,358 South Renton reserves Pre-2006: South Lake Wash. Project-bonds 462,714 SW 27th St./Strander Blvd. -bonds 557,500 Duvall-King County 127,710 °.IS Burnett Linear Park reimbursement 35,251 South Renton reserves Sub-total $ 1,712,508 Total $ 2,203,508 CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON, UPDATING THE CITY'S SIX-YEAR TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM 2007-2012. WHEREAS, the City of Renton has heretofore adopted a "Six-Year Transportation Improvement Program" pursuant to RCW 35.77.010, and the plan and program having been amended and modified from time to time as authorized by law; and WHEREAS, the City Council, after recommendation of the Planning/Building/Public Works Department, held a public hearing on August 21, 2006, after notice to the public as provided by law for the purpose of considering adoption, modification, and amendments of the plan and program; and WHEREAS, at the public hearing held on August 21, 2006, due consideration was given Nosy to the proposed changes and amendments for the purpose of updating the plan and program; NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON, DOES RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS: SECTION I. The City's "Six-Year Transportation Improvement Program" and the City's "Arterial Street Plan" are hereby further amended and modified, all as more particularly shown on the attached Exhibits "A," "B" and "C" incorporated herein as if fully set forth. SECTION II. The plan and program, as evidenced by said Exhibits, shall be and constitute the City's "Six-Year Transportation Improvement Program" and the City's "Arterial Street Plan," and shall remain in full force and effect until further revised, amended, and modified as provided by law. —w 1 RESOLUTION NO. SECTION M. The Administrator of the Department of Planning/Building/Public Works and the City Clerk are hereby authorized and directed to file this Resolution, together with the Exhibits, with the Director of Highways for the State of Washington and as otherwise provided by law. PASSED BY THE CITY COUNCIL this day of , 2006. Bonnie I. Walton, City Clerk APPROVED BY THE MAYOR this day of , 2006. Kathy Keolker, Mayor Approved as to form: Lawrence J. Warren, City Attorney RES.1 181:7/26/06:ma 2 PLANNING/BUILDING/PUBLIC WORKS TRANSPORTATION SYSTEMS DIVISION 2007 -2012 SIX-YEAR TIP CHANGES FROM PREVIOUS TIP New Old Project project Title Changes From Previous TIP/ TIP TIP No. Comments 1 1 12108 Street Overlay Program Add funds for ADA compliant curb ramp upgrades for programmed projects. _ 2 New Intersection Safety&Mobility New program to address City's traffic signal priority needs list. 3 3 12239 Strander Blvd./SW 27th St Connection Remove Phase 1,Segment 1,Federal Reserve Bank,funding(complete 2006). 4 9 12176 NE 3rd/NE 4th St.Corridor Fund design and RNV only for an approximately$6 million project(2007-2009). 5 4 12163 Renton Urban Shuttle(RUSH) No change. 6 5 12109 Transit Program Add 2007 staff time funds for transit ballot issues(RTID and ST2). 7 6 12193 Rainier Ave.Corridor Study/Improv. Decrease funding in 2007-2011;eliminate by 2012. 8 7 12501 Rainier Ave.-S 4th PI to S 2nd Add ST funding and new State Pedestrian&Bicycle Safety grant($200,000) 9 8 12502 Hardie Ave.SW Transit/Multi-modal Add ST funding and new State Pedestrian&Bicycle Safety grant($150,000) 10 10 9 Walkway Program Increase 2007 funding from$250,000 to$500,000. 11 11 12308 Rainier Av-SW 7th to 4th PI Increase funding$2.4 million(design,right-of-way and construction). 12 New Ripley Lane N Add project from Lake Washington Blvd.N to end of street. 13 12 12306 S Lake Wash.Roadway Improv. Remove District 2 costs from 6-year programmed funds. Add CTED grant-$5 M. 14 New Garden Ave.N Widening New project due to additional traffic generated by developer project. 15 13 12194 South Renton Project Add Burnett Linear Park sidewalk. 16 14 12210 1-405 Improvements in Renton Increase budget 2007-2009 and extend one more year to 2012. 17 15 12150 Project Development/Predesign Add funding for small studies and small grant matches. 18 16 12209 NE 4th St/Hoquiam Ave.NE Construction should proceed in Summer/Fall 2006. 19 17 29 Arterial Circulation Program Add studies: Truck route and Highland Subarea;continue travel demand model. 20 18 106 Bridge Inspection&Repair Increase program$100,000 for evaluation of scour and load ratings. 21 19 12503 May Creek Bridge Replacement Bridge funding not available through WSDOT until at least 2007. 22 20 16 Loop Replacement Program No change. 23 21 12113 Sign Replacement Program No change. 24 22 91 Pole Program No change. 25 23 12171 Sound Transit HOV Direct Access Add funds 2009-2011 to coordinate N 8th direct access ramps,if funded 26 24 12115 Traffic Safety Program "Heather Downs"transportation improvements included. 27 25 12162 Traffic Efficiency Program LED Program moved from the Safety Program above. 28 26 12185 CBD Bike&Ped.Connections No change in 6-year programmed funds. 29 New S 3rd St.and Shattuck Ave. Add State Pedestrian&Bi cle Safe Program Grant($200,000 award) 30 37 12504 School Zone Sign Upgrades Received WTSC grant for$52,500 for four school sites. 31 27 12186 Arterial Rehab.Prog. Add funds for ADA compliant curb ramp upgrades for programmed projects. 32 28 12123 Duvall Ave.NE Increased approximately$700,000 for right-of-way and construction costs. 33 29 12166 RR Crossing Safety Prog. No change. 34 30 12135 TDM Program Worksite count has remained stable. No changes are anticipated. 35 31 12107 Transportation Concurrency Concurrency travel times likely updated in 2006-2007. 36 32 12106 Missing Links Program Acquired three parcels from King County. 37 33 12206 GIS Needs Assessment Add funds 2006-2007 for planning/modeling software,training,technical support. 38 34 12127 Grady Wy Corridor Study Select consultant by late 2006 for study. 39 35 12173 Bicycle Route Dev.Program Add new Federal Enhancement Grant($100,000)for Renton Bike Map production. 40 36 12121 Lake Wash.Blvd.-Park to Coulon Pk No change. 41 38 12187 Environmental Monitoring Received early acceptance from Corps of Engineers for Phase 1. 42 39 12191 Trans-Valley&Soos Creek Corridor Continue coordination with WSDOT on SR 167/SW 43rd St.interchange. 43 40 12146 WSDOT Coordination Program No change. 44 41 12112 1%for the Arts No change. 45 42 12160 Arterial HOV Program No change. 46 New 12129 Benson Rd S/S 31st Signal Partner with King County for intersection/signal design and construction. 47 43 12177 Park-Sunset Corridor Add$2.8M for potential projects resulting from the Highlands Subarea study. 48 44 24 Lind Ave.-SW 16th-SW43rd Traffic increase in Renton Valley creates need;identified project unfunded. 49 45 12175 SR 169 HOV-140th to SR 900 Schedule altered to include phased construction. 50 47 12301 Sunset/Duvall Intersection Project costs reflect approximately$800,000 increase due to bids. 51 48 12303 Logan Ave.Concrete Panel Repair No change. 52 49 _ 12304 Carr/Mill Signal No change. 53 50 12213 Houser Wy S-Main to Burnett No change. 54 53 12305 Duvall Ave NE-King County No change. Out 2 12138 SR 167/SW 27th St/Strander Blvd. Move funds for planning efforts(all phases)to"Connection"project(#3)above. Out 46 12309 Benson Rd-S 26th to Main TIB grant sidewalk project completed in early 2006. Out 51 12302 Lake Wash.Blvd.Slip Plane Project complete. Out 52 12307 Monster Road Bridge Project complete. Add inspection funding to Bridge Inspection Program(#32). Changes from 2006 i - CHANGES FROM PREVIOUS TIP DRAFT 7/27/2006 o DRAFT ti Six-Year f4P�Nrco Transportation Planning/Building/ Improvement Public Works Department Program Transportation , 2007 through 2012 Division sH Hearing: Adopted: Resolution: '440 r SECTION ONE PURPOSE OF SIX-YEAR TIP PROGRAM • Purpose of Six-Year TIP 1-1 • Vision Statement 1-2 No.r • Mission Statement 1-2 • City Business Plan 1-2 Noor, dlIMOMNIIMM CITY OF RENTON SIX-YEAR TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM 2007-2012 PURPOSE • Reflects involvement by citizens and elected officials. • Implements the City of Renton Mission Statement. • Used to coordinate transportation projects and programs with other jurisdictions and agencies. • Multi-year planning tool for the development of the transportation facilities within the City. • Required for State and Federal funding programs. • Vital part of planning under the Growth Management Act. • Mandated by State Law. 1-1 CITY OF il j , VISION ir ,�,c ! 4Renton—The center of opportunity in the Puget �r- Sound Region where businesses and families thrive .0 1 . i. i 'V MISSION J ;ice - The City of Renton, in partnership with residents, businesses,and + - 13 w schools, is dedicated to: - •Providing a healthy,welcoming atmosphere where citizens choose to live, f f` raise families,and take pride in their community • Promoting planned growth and economic vitality 41 _ • Creating a positive work environment • Meeting service demands through innovation and commitment to excellence Mf1 fl G ..#�... yrs i F .. ,,„-,- ..-Iii--_- - -iii'''''': .40-• L.:'--,:i,...,,,,..... ,. - ' f, ..-.:' - aj-"' -,T '... - -Ad. „IC -:., -:10.,_' di L zi?' '; — , , tr,., - . , ', ' hr - _ .,_';.'"--•N 6 (410 t 1, __ 1 1 e BUSINESS PLAN GOALS • 2006-2011 Promote ; Promote ; Manage growth ; Meet the service ; Influence citywide neighborhood •• through sound •• demands that decisions economic • revitalization . urban planning . contribute to that impact development ; ; , the livability of the City •Promote Renton : •Support the vitality . •Foster development • the community : •Demonstrate as the progressive, ; of neighborhoods ; of vibrant,sustainable, : •Prioritize services • leadership by develop- opportunity rich city . through community , mixed-use neighborhoods . at levels that can be . ing and maintaining in the Puget Sound • involvement • in established urban • sustained by revenue • partnerships and region • centers ; investment strategies . *Encourage family- • ; •Plan,develop,and • with other jurisdictions *Capitalize on • friendly quality housing • •Uphold a high stan- • maintain quality • that improve services growth opportunities ; choices for people of all ; dard of design and ' services,in frastructure, through bold thinking • ages and income levels . property maintenance • and amenities . *Aggressively pursue and aggressive • throughout the City • transportation and economic develop- • *Ensure the safety, p health, *Respond to growing • other regional ment strategiesand security of . I Provide a balance . service demands while • improvements and • citizens through • between housing and • meeting the unique , services that improve •Recruit and retain . effective service delivery ; high quality jobs ; requirements of a diverse • quality of life businesses to ensure • • population through a dynamic,diversified ; *Promote pedestrian • •Promote annexation ; partnerships,innovation, ; •Advocate Renton's iployment base . and bicycle linkages . where and when it is in y g • and outcome manage- • interests through state • between neighborhoods • the best interest of • ment • and federal lobbying Conment tinue redevelop- and community focal ; Renton ; ; efforts Downtown,in the ; points ; . *Retain a skilled • workforce by making • Highlands,and South • ; ; Renton the mmunicipal Lake Washington • employer of choice • SECTION TWO SIX-YEAR TIP MAP • TIP Map, Exhibit A 2-1 • Map Index, Exhibit B 2-2 , . -- I -----4 ;F• .1--- ; ;; ; ; ; : *.„, f.f 1 ----- f •t..,L-4 Y OF RENTO c : _ =-- ii; rtri • El- ,,, XHIBIT 'A' - .1,, ..,. 2007-2012 - -- • ,/,:,,\1.,.,_;--1 ..4...., .. -_ ,• ;‘,1 -, Project Ma • ---------0 ---i=-- ' --"yri•-' --1 / y f ,-. _. ;. •,•-. ,vY 0 , • • • 4,, N , (i' , - --' , , ;\ ;• , ‘‘., ', -\-' '--- 'IN i -P- - - - ' , - , - - i ,• ,-,, / k, ,,., -.. _, ., . 1\r.co ,, -1-- -1-1 •I - ft ,.1:.--,-,,,,..../ ,. -, , 4 ,',' 11 li , • ___i • "' 'Il '4-] ' -'±-----71 i IL_;..%,t-, #.;_,• 4 , i - -- . '- '-.".- - -'--"t--, 7--]:eit.--,- ,_ _,).,-- -- .• -\1, ., :- - 6-i---'-'• • -,: ?- F-\, 'i - - , s '' -s n. ‘,11-," ' ' 7 .- ,• ""' .'+ t_ - -:—.-----1 - -- ' _, , = ..-k, , .-, , ,' , --- '1 . - - i-__.7....-i_lf _ ' --- - - -7.----- t- i -- ----.-- _, ,. _,,.-; 7 „c___ ,,, 7i:*-:-i•‘.1 / ::::' -." D •41? _ ,,_,_., - - • \- L. t 1 . , IV .-- ,-4 1,..:4'-'!""-i f:7-0.- •,.. 'roe -4 . -1,-_t_T-----., N. •-,`>-.-11t,,-i - ', - . ..4 ._ . ' I.,11. -411,--;\ 4,-,- -,--i•••• ., if(r.if,),7'.,7 -____----„,.i. --:.-,., ; ,. ;, 1 ,•_ . -- OAS' ' : 1(17,.. ii 7,••,1 i 7- : -: -",---;:,, •\__.N.,'-',A.2; ti ., 4.1,p- ,,.,-,. r NIP" LAKE IPAS1134-,XZON _ t\ ..'i,' fill •'. - •"'i-,."""" _... .l 4.7]--,. --.I.1., :( i'-',',1.47.,-,_'..,..... ii ."..e• ' i t-- .1 -1-'-i,, - ,r-Th,,, ! I I I If_J ii 1 , .. , ,......_ ,..... .....„ till ::,,_.:, :::::r f ., ....i__ . , , ,...,. „ . ,,,..i, ,. .t, , -f-r•'-,:ii' -1 -, -?',.....i 11 :_z:Ift t' .- 114 -,',t '.-3-:.1- -,,,,... ., ' •Ir-.a:7_ _ _.---1 { ---r---'- •- A, •"44..;14.! illa; •.<.-•; T ' ' ' 1 — :::: 1"-j'',..: 11-----•!- -4.' ' J f - ..e''),-, 'A‘1-,,,-!0 if_ .--•:`: , ' 1.7' I , -....ft 1 1 1 .si •"4. ,, .. 1 1 i Niro- --e..:„..,,\-• 7L ,‘"-%. --: -4. r-. '"' 7.'"'" I 0 i1,71 . . - 0 A . ; Ab __,, , ,„ 4.„ hi, -: in ,- - 1 ,,- • --t...r. I r ' "•-,-7' ,1 -) -.44".' '!"' 2 Ay, , ,.i v 1 9.41, • \VAN „.„ , ,,, , • _ , i.,.., . _ . .. ,. ..,.,.,t, 1 AIJIP."1 I ''' ' ' -----,- 1----- . -,, , Y !ILI)ri ' .. . - • st ,s. .,• . '. 't ,A . .'" q.... _ -•••Ai...._ -- „.... ., _ .,-.1 • ,.... '4.4 -----1\._ . 1-__ .•_-.1.17,,s70 popf! $ , T-, • -- jr •--- _ ;1 ,kir, . 1 ',. I ,.-_„..„, _'', - _ .,&,,, '.4Lc;,-..),;) . ""% l rAnni, ,,, -•:c.913 • i•N' "r;-1 --'\ - 'r-; r--.7-1--z, r-'' - 7, . 141 • _- -- _, 4 iguilij I(ft...w ,A -,e1 . ri ,‘ s .... 1140,-----,,--,-----.. _ _4111/1111 Fr, 1 la1f i 1 i i.i 0 r f-'1-- ., ,,'- -I,,,,.. ---'-'---- ._.-:-.-.-r IV!,"1 k :Li \ -•- -,,,k\ h\ \_,-_'3 \ '"'"_-,--?- •--F1/1(...,......._________:--;-.i‘re:41P.r/ 1 ilibile) , I,,•,? ,,,,,/ • - '•,,- --.., r,..i ' t • N -f,,--, ‘ -, ., 1 . I. , .i • i. NV\<_ ‘, -2N-`:' IL 1 i \ i ---' -" ' • IC I ""' . . _,a Fp -__ ...„ it-! " I . r ! 0 i A- ,, \-. 1.„1„„f .... •,..• _. , • / -,._.._:, _ ,- • ••• , • -\--,J - • - if ,..,, , .. ,,,__ • . , .f....... _ !_ i , I i fl ;_ ; ;_ ,/ i , I \j' I ' I 1 f ..... ( i ..•a . 'I I , . -.,_ I •.... 0 i il •12/ i ,-- eir)i i J/PV-I ,_ ,----:-f'l . all *low 1 . , ... ___, 11---T -:---r ci---,:,. al I III. ! i 0 ,..i.._ , ,I, 10110NAN IL!! : ;i •„...., , z,. --- _ .± __,_____,,i. ,.. P•ri Mia ) ow; -,.,„„,:, - .....! :'-' '4'4 1 ) \ - ,, :a '7't ' , • - t ;-‘ o-, 2-1 EXHIIBIT `B' City of Renton 2007—2012 Transportation Improvement Program Map Index *4100 TIP No. Project Title 1 Street Overlay Program 2 Intersection Safety and Mobility 3 Strander Blvd/SW 27th Street Connection 4 NE 3`d/NE 4th Corridor 5 Renton Urban Shuttle(RUSH) 6 Transit Program 7 Rainier Avenue Corridor Study and Improvements 8 Rainier Avenue—S 4th Place to S 2nd 9 Hardie Avenue SW Transit/Multi-modal 10 Walkway Program 11 Rainier Avenue—SW 7th to 4th Place 12 Ripley Lane N 13 S Lake Wash. Roadway Improvement 14 Garden Avenue 15 South Renton Project 16 I-405 Improvements in Renton 17 Project Development/Predesign 18 NE 4th Street/Hoquiam Avenue NE 19 Arterial Circulation Program 20 Bridge Inspection and Repair 21 May Creek Bridge Replacement 22 Loop Replacement Program 23 Sign Replacement Program 24 Pole Replacement Program 25 Sound Transit HOV Direct Access 26 Traffic Safety Program 27 Traffic Efficiency Program 28 CBD Bicycle and Pedestrian Connections 29 S 3rd Street and Shattuck Avenue 30 School Zone Sign Upgrades 31 Arterial Rehabilitation Program 32 Duvall Avenue NE 33 Railroad Crossing Safety Program 34 TDM Program 35 Transportation Concurrency 36 Missing Links Program 37 GIS Needs Assessment 38 Grady Way Corridor Study 39 Bicycle Route Development Program . 4811 2 - 2 2007—2012 SIX-YEAR Transportation Improvement Program EXHIBIT `B' Map Index Now TIP No. Project Title 40 Lake Washington Boulevard—Park Avenue N to Coulon Park 41 Environmental Monitoring 42 Trans-Valley and Soos Creek Corridor 43 WSDOT Coordination Program 44 1% for the Arts Program 45 Arterial HOV Program 46 Benson Road S/S 31St Signal 47 Park—Sunset Corridor 48 Lind Avenue—SW 16`h to SW 43rd 49 SR 169 HOV—SE 140thto SR 900 50 Sunset/Duvall Intersection 51 Logan Avenue Concrete Panel Repair 52 Carr/Mill Signal 53 Houser Way S—Main to Burnett 54 Duvall Avenue NE—King County slhrr 2-3 H:\FJLE SYS\TRP\TRP-2412007 TIP Map Index SECTION THREE DEVELOPMENT & PRIORITIZATION OF THE SIX- YEAR TIP • General Programming Criteria 3-1 • Specific TIP Development Activities 3-3 • Summary Table of Projects and Programs: 3-5 DEVELOPMENT AND PRIORITIZATION OF THE SIX-YEAR TIP Nome I. General Programming Criteria The yearly update of the Six-Year Transportation Improvement Program(TIP) is part of an on-going process intrinsically linked with the development of the City's Capital Improvement Program. The Six-Year TIP is also linked with various state and federal funding programs, regional/inter- jurisdictional planning and coordination processes and the City's Growth Management Act Comprehensive Land Use Plan. Projects are developed and prioritized based on both specific goals to be achieved by the program and on general programming considerations. Those general programming considerations are: Planning. How, on both a local and regional level, a project fits with or addresses identified future transportation goals, demands and planning processes must be evaluated. This is strongly influenced by ongoing land use decisions and by regional highway and transit system plans. Financing. Many projects are dependent on acquisition of outside grants, formation of LID's or the receipt of mitigation funds. Prioritization has to take into account the peculiarities of each of the various fund sources and the probabilities of when, and how much, money will be available. Scheduling. If a project is interconnected with, or interdependent on, other projects taking place, this is reflected in their relative priorities. Past Commitment. The level of previous commitment made by the City in terms of resources, legislative actions or inter-local agreements also must be taken into consideration in prioritizing TIP projects. In addition to the general considerations discussed above, there are five specific project categories through which the TIP is evaluated and analyzed. They are: • Preservation of Existing Infrastructure • Multi-Modal and Transportation Demand Management • Community Livability and Enhancement • Economic Development • Operations and Safety These categories provide a useful analysis tool and represent goals developed through an evaluation of the City's transportation program in response to input from citizens and local officials and to State and Federal legislation. Taken as a whole, the five categories provide a framework for evaluating projects both individually and as part of a strategy that seeks to meet and balance the transportation needs of Renton during a 3-1 time of increasing transportation demand, decreasing revenues and growing environmental concerns. Although each project can be identified with an important concern that allows it to be classified into one of the five categories, most projects are intended to address, and are developed to be compatible with, multiple goals. Preservation of the Existing Infrastructure is a basic need that must be met by the program. The Mayor, City Council and Citizens Transportation Advisory Committee have all addressed the importance of sustaining strong programs in this project category. The state Growth Management Act also requires jurisdictions to assess and address the funding required to maintain their existing transportation system. Multi-modal and Transportation Demand Management (TDM) projects and programs are oriented toward "moving people" through a balanced transportation system that involves multiple modes of transportation and provides alternatives to the existing heavy reliance on the single occupant vehicle (SOV). Included are facilities that facilitate the movement of transit and carpools, and programs that promote the use of high occupancy vehicles (HOV's) and reduce the number of SOV's. The Federal Transportation Efficiency Act (TEA-21), the State and Federal Clean Air legislation and the State Commute Trip Reduction Act (CTR) have added momentum to regional efforts and placed requirements on local jurisdictions such as Renton to promote these transportation elements. Community Livability and Enhancement consists of projects that have been developed with major emphasis on addressing community quality of life issues by improving and/or protecting residential livability while providing necessary transportation system improvements. Bicycle and pedestrian projects are included in this category. Economic Development projects and programs involve transportation improvements necessitated by new development that is taking place. Thus, a significant source of local funding for these projects is projected to come from mitigation payments and from specific access needs financed by new development. Operations and Safety projects and programs are developed through on-going analyses of the transportation system and are directed mainly toward traffic engineering concerns such as safety and congestion. Projects are identified not only by analysis of traffic counts, accident records and geometric data, but also through review and investigation of citizen complaints and requests. Following this text are tables that display and summarize the six-year funding plan broken out in accordance with the five program categories. TTP_FUND.doo 3-2 Below is a more specific discussion of the activities involved in TIP Now, II. Specific TIP Development Activities TIP project and financial development activities are intricately intertwined and involve interactions with many groups and agencies at the local, regional, state and federal levels. Within the Transportation Systems Division of the City of Renton, project development involves year-around coordination among the Maintenance and Operations Section, the Planning and Program Section and the Design Section. The Transportation Maintenance and Operations Section compiles accident and traffic count data, performs level of service calculations needed to identify operational/congestion problems and tracks all transportation-related complaints, suggestions and requests that come into the City. The Transportation Design Section, through the TIP's "Overlay Program" and "Bridge Inspection and Repair Program", works closely with the Maintenance Services Division and with its Pavement Management System to establish structural ratings for the City's roads and bridges. These and other data are being used by the Planning and Program Section to develop transportation improvement projects, prepare grant applications, interface with ongoing state and federal transportation programs, and develop a TIP that supports the goals of the City's long range Comprehensive Plan and short range business plan. Akow Two important examples of how this data is used are: 1. To complete Transportation Improvement Board (TIB) Arterial Inventory Worksheet forms for each section of each arterial in the City and 2. To complete Washington State Bridge Inventory System(WSBIS) forms for each bridge. These forms provide a ranking of overall deficiency both within the City and in comparison with similar facilities elsewhere in the state. These rankings, in turn, become important elements in securing funding from the TIB's Transportation Partnership Program (TPP) and Arterial Improvement Program(MP)and from the federal bridge program. The data are also used in making other grant applications for hazard elimination and safety projects and for railroad crossing upgrades and other federal programs under TEA-21. The Transportation Planning Section works with Metro Transit, the Puget Sound Regional Council, Sound Transit and other groups and agencies to assure consistency between Renton's transportation policies and programs and those of the region. Such consistency is required by the Growth Management Act and related legislation and by federal and state grant programs. On-going transportation planning activities, such as updating the Transportation Element and traffic model, coordinating with the City's Comprehensive Plan and the development of sub-area plans, Noe TIP FUND.dot 3-3 • such as the Central Business District, the Valley and the North Renton areas, play an important part in identifying and prioritizing transportation improvement projects. State and regional transportation projects also play an important role such as those involving Sound Transit, the ,1010 Metropolitan Transportation Plan and the State Systems Plan. Within the City of Renton, there are actions and interactions involving other departments and divisions, the private sector, the City Council and Administration, which strongly influence the direction of the transportation program. For example, the transportation system is significantly impacted by land use decisions, private development proposals and by public water and sewer extensions which increase transportation demand by making possible higher density and/or intensity of land uses. Such proposals need to be monitored and analyzed in regard to how they individually and collectively create the need for transportation improvements. All departments and divisions in the City, the City Council, the Administration and the Mayor's Citizens Transportation Advisory Committee are solicited each year to provide input, discuss and comment on the Six-Year TIP. Additional input is also gathered through interactions with other public and private organizations and through public meetings held in the community concerning specific transportation projects and programs. At the City, State and Federal level there are new laws and regulations that create the need for new or different kinds of transportation projects and programs. Examples include the Transportation Efficiency Act (TEA-21), the Growth Management Act, the Clean Air Act, the Commute Trip Reduction law, the Endangered Species Act and the Surface Water Management Ordinance. All of these laws have tremendous impacts on the development and costs of transportation projects. Interconnection and/or interdependence among TIP projects and with projects by other City departments and by other jurisdictions is another important element that affects the development, the prioritization and the timing of transportation projects. Equally important is the likelihood, the time frame and the amount of outside funding that will be obtainable to finance transportation projects. In summary, with its heavy dependence on many different and unpredictable sources of outside funding and with the significant impacts created by on-going local and regional land use decisions, transportation project development is a continuous activity comprised of a multitude of diverse elements. TIP_FUND 3-4 CITY OF RENTON - PLANNING/BUILDING/PUBLIC WORKS - TRANSPORTATION SYSTEMS DIVISION - 2007-2012 TIP Project Previous Six-Year Total Pro ect T •= TIP Pro'ectTitle No. Costs 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 Period Total Cost Funded Unfunded 0 • - 11EIDAc 485,000 485,000 485,000 485,000 485,000 485,000 2,910,000 4,269,326 4,164,326 105,000 Ex Rainier Av-SW 7th to 4th P1 SEM 1,160,655 2,629,000 1,650,000 1,925,000 1,925,000-- 8,129,000 9,289,655 7,231,819 2,057,836 IIEM South Renton Pro ect 647,580 75,000 75,000 722,580 - 1: - 0 105,000 75,000 55,000 50,000 55,000 50,000 390,000 654 581 619,581 35,000 ®May Creek Bridge Replacement ®i 120,000 550,000 160,000 5,000 715,000 835,000 186,000 649 000 ® •••Re•acement Pr••ram 40,105 15,000 15 000 15,000 20,000 20,000 20,000 105,000 145,105 • 1 15,000 ®Qj•g .lz.z�r,aa•duse -®® 5,000 5,000 5,000 7,500 7,500 7,500 37,500 48,755 rr ©Pole Program 0 37,954 20,000 20 000 20,000 25,000 25,000 25,000 135,000 172,954 157,954 15,000 ®Arterial Rehab.Pr••- 435,000 240,000 360,000 760,000 200,000 200,000 200,000 1,960,000 2,395,000 2,320,000 75,000 ®Duvall Ave NE ® 2,668,200 1,700,000 600 000 2,300,000 4,968,200 4,968,200 11131 GIS Needs Assessment 41,700 35,000 20,000 20,000 20,000 20,000 20,000 135,000 176,700 116,700 60,000 0 Environmental Monitorin• �� 75,000 50,000 30 000 30,000 30,000 30,000 245,000 404,635 45,000 0 •.an Av Concrete Panel Re•-ir - - 460,000 460,000 460,000- 460,000 m Duvall Ave NE-Kin.Coun 1,982,646 1,975,000 636,300 -- 2,611,300 4,593,946 4,593,946- EINE 3rd/NE 4th CorridorI 532,862 102,000 230,000 325',000000 2 ,000 4,050,000 1,770,000 3,280,000 9,752,000 am110,284,862 1,184,862 9,100,000 Q Renton Urban Shuttle RUSH 6,361 5,000 5,000 5,000 5,000 5,000 5,000 30,000 33,361 3,000 OTransitPro,ram11 30,000 18,000 13,000 18,000 18,000 18,000 120,000 145,714 9,000 Q Rainier Av Corridor Study/Improv. 302,913 10,000 10,000 5,000 5,000 • 5,000- 35,000 337,913�- 111111111111115M ORainier Av-S 4th PI to S 2nd 597,000 1,220,000 698,000 3,795,000 -- 5,713,000 6,310,000 6,310,000 OHardleAvSW Transit/Multi-modal 12502 1,168,521 4,228,479 8,290,000 1,650,000 14,168,479 15,337,000 15,337,000- mProjectDevelopmenUPredesign 322,592 225,000 225,000 225,000 200,000 200,000 200,000 1,275,000 1,597,592 1,522,592 75,000 Es Arterial Circulation Program 42 260,680 200,000 200,000 200,000 200,000 250,000 250,000 1,300,000 1,560,680 1,385,680 175,000 0 Sound Transit HOV Direct Access ®�i 4,000 4,000 4,000- 12,000 83,910 8,000 0 S 3rd St and Shattuck Av 45,000 255,000 255,000 300,000 300,000 111.11.1111.111 ®TDM Program ® 108,475 55,000 55,000 55;000 55 000 55,000 55,000 330,000 438,475 438,475- OGrad W Corridor Stud 63,421 50,000 50,000 50000 230,000 1,810,000 1,020,000 3,210,000 3,273,421 3,060,000 Esi Trans-Valley&Soos Creek Corr. 12,539 5,000 5,000 5,000 15,000 27,539 Q WSDOT Coordination Program 23,600 15,000 15,000 15,000 10,000 10,000 10,000 75,000 98,600 98,600- mArterial HOV Program 132,354 5,000 5,000 10,000 142,354�- m ParkSunset Corridor ® 64,904 25,000 50,000 200,000 1,750 100 1,010,000- 3035,100 3,100,004 339,904 2,760,100 �SR 169 HOV-140th to SR900 ® 6,110,597 30,000 2,550,000 340,000 2,920,000 , 9,030,597 9,030,597- In10 9 749,032 350,000 250,000 250,000 250,000 250,000 250,000 1,600,000 2,349,032 2,049,032 300000 �Bic cle Route Dev.Pr.•ram 12173 30,701 120,000 18,000 18,000 110,000 80 000 80,000 426,000 456,701 186,701 270,000 1E111%for the Arts 12112 75,669 60,000 30,000 30,000 50,000 30,000 30,000 230,000 305,669 305,669 ©SW 27th St/Strander By Connect. MEN 5,501,0010 6,222,000 5,816,000 10,000 1,096,600 22,576,000 6,067,700 41,788,300 47,289,301 22,310,201 24,979,100 ®Ripley Lane ®i 500,000 -- 500,000 500,000 500,000- Km Lake Wash.Roadwa Im•rov. 12,837,714 12,353,700 12,353,700 25,191,414IllenBall gm Garden Av N Widening .r alill 1,000,000 _ 1,000,000 1,000,000 1,000,000- 1311-405 Improvements in Renton 12210 98,385 30,000 30,000 30,000 10,000 10,000 10,000 120,000 218,385 218,385 CBD Bike 8 Ped.Connections 12185 131,544 50,000 50,000 50,000 50,000 50,000 50,000 300,000 431,544 296,544 135,000 �TransConcurrency 40,000 20,000 40,000 10,000 10,000 30,000 10,000 120,000 160,000 140,000 20,000 0 Lake Wash.By Park to Coulon Pk ® 323,138-- 84,500 141,600 111111.11.1. 500,000 549,2381 147,675 ©Intersection Safe &Mobili •�.1 250,000 250,000 250,000 250,000 250,000 1,250,000 1,250,000 500,000 750,000 HNE 4th SUHoquiam Av NE 12209 390,400 9,600 9,600 400,000 400,000- Traffic Safe Pr••ram 12115 146,734 25,000 20,000 20,000 40,000 40,000 40,000 185,000 331,734 60,000 27 Traffic Efficiency Program 12162 344,924 55,000 50,000 50,000 30,000 30,000 30,000 245,000 589,924 589,924 30 School Zone Sign Upgrades 12504 100,000 100,000 100,000 200,000 300,000 300,000 33 RRCrossin,Safe Pr••. 12166 5,240 5,000 10,000 10,000 25,000 30,240 20240 10,000 IRMissing Links Program 12106 30,380 30,000 30,000 30,000 30,000 30,000 30,000 180,000 210,380 120,380 90,000 Benson Rd S/S 31st Signal 12129 350,000 350,000 350,000 350,000 Q Lind Av-SW 16thSW43rd MOM 5,000 5,000 5,000 1,914,000 626,000- 2 550,000 2,555,000 15 000 2,540 000 so SunseUDuvalllntersectlon 12301 1,668,000 30,000 30,000 1,698,000 1,698,000 62 Carr/Mill Signal 12304 3,000 5,000 10,000 20,000 340,000 400,000 10,000 785,000 788,000 38,000 750,000 63 Houser W S-Main to Burnett 12213 810,000 810,000 810,000 810,000 otal Sources 41,267,941 35,939,779 23,191,31+ 10,385,000 45,164,700 30,523,100 12,543,200 127,747,079 169.015,021 119,438,809 49,578,211 sox. 3-5 DRAFT o,rsmao. •m,,,, SECTION FOUR EXPENDITURES & REVENUES • Total Project Expenditure Summary 4-1 • Summary of Funding Sources 4-2 • Itemized Funding Sources: • Vehicle Fuel Tax 4-3 • Business License Fee 4-4 • Proposed Fund Balance 4-5 • Grants In-hand 4-6 • Mitigation In-Hand 4-7 • Bonds/L.I.D.'s Formed 4-8 • Other In-Hand 4-9 • Grants Proposed 4-10 • Mitigation Proposed 4-11 • L.I.D.'s Proposed 4-12 • Other Proposed 4-13 • Undetermined 4-14 CITY OF RENTON PLANNING/BUILDING/PUBLIC WORKS slow' TRANSPORTATION SYSTEMS DIVISION 2007-2012 SIX-YEAR TIP Six-Year Project Cost Summary* Period TIP Project Title 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 Total 1 Street Overlay Program 485,000 485,000 485,000 485,000 485,000 485,000 2,910,000 2 Intersection Safety&Mobility 250,000 250,000 250,000 250,000 250,000 1,250,000 3 SW 27th St/Strander By Connect. 6,222,000 5,816,000 10,000 1,096,600 22,576,000 6,067,700 41,788,300 4 NE 3rd/NE 4th Corridor 102,000 230,000 320,000 4,050,000 1,770,000 3,280,000 9,752,000_ 5 Renton Urban Shuttle(RUSH) 5,000, 5,000 5,000 5,000 5,000 5,000 30,000 6 Transit Program 30,000 18,000 18,000 18,000 18,000 18,000 120,000 7 Rainier Av Corridor Study/Improv. 10,000 10,000 5,000 5,000 5,000 35,000 8 Rainier Av-S 4th PI to S 2nd 1,220,000 698,000 3,795,000 5,713,000 9 Hardie Av SW Transit/Multi-modal 4,228,479 8,290,000 1,650,000 14,168,479 10 Walkway Program 350,000 250,000 250,000 250,000 250,000 250,000 1,600,000 11 Rainier Av-SW 7th to 4th PI 2,629,000 1,650,000 1,925,000 1,925,000 8,129,000 12 Ripley Lane 500,000 500,000 13 S Lake Wash.Roadway Improv. 12,353,700 12,353,700 14 Garden Av N Widening 1,000,000 _ 1,000,000 15 South Renton Project 75,000 75,000 16 1-405 Improvements in Renton 30,000 30,000 30,000 10,000 10,000 10,000, 120,000 17 Project Development/Predesign 225,000 225,000 225,000 200,000 200,000 200,000 1,275,000 18 NE 4th St/Hoquiam Av NE 9,600 9,600 19 Arterial Circulation Program 200,000 200,000 200,000 200,000 250,000 250,000 1,300,000 20 Bridge Inspection&Repair 105,000 75,000 55,000 50,000 55,000 50,000 390,000 21 May Creek Bridge Replacement 550,000 160,000 5,000 715,000 22 Loop Replacement Program 15,000 15,000 15,000 20,000 20,000 20,000 105,000 23 Sign Replacement Program 5,000 5,000 5,000 7,500 7,500 7,500 37,500 24 Pole Program 20,000 20,000 20,000 25,000 25,000 25,000 135,000 25 Sound Transit HOV Direct Access 4,000 4,000 4,000 12,000 26 Traffic Safety Program 25,000 20,000 20,000 40,000 40,000 40,000 185,000 27 Traffic Efficiency Program 55,000 50,000 50,000 30,000 30,000 30,000 245,000 28 CBD Bike&Ped.Connections 50,000 50,000 50,000 50,000 50,000 50,000 300,000 29 S 3rd St and Shattuck Av 255,000 255,000 30 School Zone Sign Upgrades 100,000 100,000 200,000 31 Arterial Rehab.Prog. 240,000 360,000 760,000 200,000 200,000, 200,000 1,960,000 32 Duvall Ave NE 1,700,000 600,000 2,300,000 33 RR Crossing Safety Prog. 5,000 10,000 10,000 25,000 34 TDM Program 55,000 55,000 55,000 55,000 55,000 55,000 330,000 35 Trans Concurrency 20,000 40,000 10,000 10,000 30,000 10,000 120,000 36 Missing Links Program 30,000 30,000 30,000 30,000 30,000 30,000 180,000 37 GIS Needs Assessment 35,000 20,000 20,000 20,000 20,000 20,000 135,000 38 Grady Wy Corridor Study 50,000 50,000 50,000 230,000 1,810,000 1,020,000 3,210,000 39 Bicycle Route Dev.Program 120,000 18,000, 18,000 110,000 80,000 80,000 426,000 40 Lake Wash.By-Park to Coulon Pk 84,500 141,600 226,100 41 Environmental Monitoring 75,000 50,000 30,000 30,000 30,000 30,000 245,000 42 Trans-Valley&Soos Creek Corr. 5,000 5,000 5,000 15,000 43 WSDOT Coordination Program 15,000 15,000 15,000 10,000 10,000 10,000 75,000 44 1%for the Arts 60,000 30,000 30,000 50,000 30,000 30,000 230,000 45 Arterial HOV Program 5,000 5,000 10,000 46 Benson Rd S/S 31st Signal 350,000 350,000 47 Park-Sunset Corridor 25,000 50,000 200,000 1,750,100 1,010,000 3,035,100 48 Lind Av-SW 16th-SW43rd 5,000 5,000 1,914,000 626,000 2,550,000 49 SR 169 HOV-140th to SR900 30,000, 2,550,000 340,000 2,920,000 50 Sunset/Duvall Intersection 30,000 30,000 51 Logan Av Concrete Panel Repair 460,000 460,000 52 Carr/Mill Signal 5,000 10,000 20,000 340,000 400,000 10,000 785,000 53 Houser Wy S-Main to Burnett 810,000 810,000 54 Duvall Ave NE-King County 1,975,000 636,300 2,611,300 Total Expenditures 35,939,779 23,191,300 10,385,000 15,164,700 30,523,100 12,543,200 127,747,079 Six-rw_vne�s� "Including unfunded amounts. 07/77/2036 a Nome4-1 DRAFT CITY OF RENTON PLANNING/BUILDING/PUBLIC WORKS TRANSPORTATION SYSTEMS DIVISION 2007 - 2012 SIX-YEAR TIP SUMMARY OF FUNDING SOURCES Period ITEM Period Total 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 SIX-YEAR PROJECT COSTS: Project Development 3,381,200 626,300 620,300 544300 510,700 554,300 525,300 Precon Eng/Admin 8,716,138 3,007,338 507,500 383,500 2,027,600 2,255,900 534,300 R-O-W(includes Admin) 4,173,641 1,858,641 790,000 200,000 350,000 608,000 367,000 Construction Contract Fee 96,696,200 24,329,800 19,156,000 7,817,700 10,984,200 24,494,400 9,914,100 Construction Eng/Admin 9,582,900 2,255,200 1,842,800 784,800 1,144,500 2,478,300 1,077,300 Other 5,197,000 3,862,500 274,700 654,700 147,700 132,200 125,200 Sub -TOTAL SIX-YEAR COST 127,747,079 35,939,779 23,191,300 10,385,000 15,164,700 30,523,100 12,543,200 SOURCE OF FUNDS: Vehicle Fuel Tax 1 3,590,000 565,000 585,000 805,000 610,000 475,000 550,000 Business License Fee 1 9,600,000 1,600,000 1,600,000 3,376,500 1,309,500 897,000 817,000 Proposed Fund Balance 7,373,254 4,537,972 2,164,782 670,500 Grants In-Hand 16,474,421 8,808,914 5,251,000 1,100,000 1,004,482 310,025 Mitigation In-Hand ' 6,567,207 3,035,607 2,261,700 817,800 452,100 Bonds/L.I.D.'s Formed 9,461,286 9,461,286 Other In-Hand 25,104,700, 7,447,000 9,951,500 3,610,200, 619,000, 3,435,000 42,000 Sub-TOTAL SIX-YEAR FUNDED 78,170,868 35,455,779 21,813,982 10,380,000 3,995,082 5,117,025 1,409,000 Grants Proposed 1,479,000 484,000, 160,000 5,000 630,000 200,000 Mitigation Proposed L.I.D.'s Proposed Other Proposed 480,000 486,000 Undetermined 47,617,211 1,217,318 10,059,618 25,206,075, 11,134,200 Sub-TOTAL SIX-YEAR UNFUNDED 49,576,211 484,000 1,377,318 5,000 11,169,618 25,406,075 11,134,200 TOTAL SOURCES -FUNDED& UNFUNDED 127,747,079 35,939,779 23,191,300 10,385,000 15,164,700 30,523,100 12,543,200 Summ_of_Source 07/27/2006 6:22 4 - 2 DRAFT I Some funds are estimated earlier than expected. lik. „_ CITY OF RENTON PLANNING/BUILDING/PUBLIC WORKS TRANSPORTATION SYSTEMS DIVISION err 2007-2012 SIX-YEAR TIP Vehicle Fuel Tax Period TIP Project Title 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 Total 1 Street Overlay Program 350,000 350,000 350,000 350,000 430,000 430,000 2,260,000 2 Intersection Safety&Mobility 3 SW 27th St/Strander By Connect. 240,000 240,000 4 NE 3rd/NE 4th Corridor 102,000 85,000 187,000 5 Renton Urban Shuttle(RUSH) 6 Transit Program 7 Rainier Av Corridor Study/Improv. 8 Rainier Av-S 4th PI to S 2nd 13,000 25,000 38,000 9 Hardie Av SW Transit/Multi-modal 125,000 125,000 10 Walkway Program 11 Rainier Av-SW 7th to 4th PI 100,000 245,000 20,000 365,000 12 Ripley Lane 13 S Lake Wash.Roadway Improv. 14 Garden Av N Widening 15 South Renton Project 16 1-405 Improvements in Renton 17 Project Development/Predesign 18 NE 4th St/Hoquiam Av NE 19 Arterial Circulation Program 20 Bridge Inspection&Repair 21 May Creek Bridge Replacement 22 Loop Replacement Program 23 Sign Replacement Program 24 Pole Program 25 Sound Transit HOV Direct Access r11re 26 Traffic Safety Program 20,000 20,000 27 Traffic Efficiency Program 28 CBD Bike&Ped.Connections 29 S 3rd St and Shattuck Av 30 School Zone Sign Upgrades 31 Arterial Rehab.Prog. 210,000 40,000 100,000 350,000 32 Duvall Ave NE 33 RR Crossing Safety Prog, 34 TDM Program 35 Trans Concurrency 36 Missing Links Program 37 GIS Needs Assessment 38 Grady Wy Corridor Study 39 Bicycle Route Dev.Program 40 Lake Wash.By-Park to Coulon Pk 41 Environmental Monitoring 5,000 5,000 42 Trans-Valley&Soos Creek Corr. 43 WSDOT Coordination Program 44 1%for the Arts 45 Arterial HOV Program 46 Benson Rd S/S 31st Signal 47 Park-Sunset Corridor 48 Lind Av-SW 16th-SW43rd 49 SR 169 HOV-140th to SR900 50 Sunset/Duvall Intersection 51 Logan Av Concrete Panel Repair 52 Carr/Mill Signal 53 Houser Wy S-Main to Burnett 54 Duvall Ave NE-King County Total Sources 565,000 585,000 805,000 610,000 475,000 550,000 3,590,000 Gut. wmnooe 8 2 %me 4-3 DRAFT Note:$140,000 of revenues expected in 2011 and$70,000 in 2012 are shown in 2009. CITY OF RENTON PLANNING/BUILDING/PUBLIC WORKS TRANSPORTATION SYSTEMS DIVISION 2007-2012 SIX-YEAR TIP Business License Fee Period TIP Project Title 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 Total 1 Street Overlay Program 55,000 55,000 55,000 100,000 20,000 20,000 305,000 2 Intersection Safety&Mobility 50,000 50,000 100,000 3 SW 27th St/Strander By Connect. 10,000 10,000 50,000 70,000 4 NE 3rd/NE 4th Corridor 86,800 86,800 5 Renton Urban Shuttle(RUSH) 5,000 5,000 5,000 4,000 4,000 4,000 27,000 6 Transit Program 30,000 18,000 18,000 15,000 15,000 15,000 111,000 7 Rainier Av Corridor Study/Improv._ 10,000 10,000 5,000 5,000 5,000 35,000 8 Rainier Av-S 4th PI to S 2nd 62,800 32,300 1,169,200 1,264,300 9 Hardie Av SW Transit/Multi-modal 200,000 217,500 165,000 582,500 10 Walkway Program 100,000 100,000 250,000 150,000 150,000 150,000 900,000 11 Rainier Av-SW 7th to 4th PI 20,000 680,000 100,000 800,000 12 Ripley Lane 13 S Lake Wash.Roadway Improv. _ , 14 Garden Av N Widening 15 South Renton Project _ 16 1-405 Improvements in Renton 20,000 10,000 10,000 10,000 10,000 60,000 17 Project Development/Predesign 175,000 175,000 200,000 175,000 175,000 175,000 1,075,000 18 NE 4th St/Hoquiam Av NE 19 Arterial Circulation Program 200,000 200,000 200,000 175,000 175,000 175,000 1,125,000 20 Bridge Inspection&Repair 40,000 40,000 40,000 40,000 40,000 40,000 240,000 21 May Creek Bridge Replacement 22 Loop Replacement Program 15,000 15,000 15,000 15,000 15,000 15,000 90,000 23 Sign Replacement Program _ 5,000 5,000 5,000 5,000 5,000 5,000, 30,000 24 Pole Program 20,000 20,000 20,000 20,000 20,000 20,000 120,000 25 Sound Transit HOV Direct Access 4,000 4,000 26 Traffic Safety Program 20,000 20,000 20,000 20,000 20,000 100,000 27 Traffic Efficiency Program 55,000 50,000 50,000 30,000 30,000 30,000 245,000 28 CBD Bike&Ped.Connections 50,000 50,000 50,000 5,000 5,000 5,000 165,000 29 S 3rd St and Shattuck Av 45,000 45,000 30 School Zone Sign Upgrades 100,000 100,000 200,000 31 Arterial Rehab.Prog. 55,000 150,000 95,000 135,000 75,000 510,000 32 Duvall Ave NE 16,200 16,200 33 RR Crossing Safety Prog. 5,000 10,000 15,000 34 TDM Program 13,000 13,000 13,000 13,000 13,000 13,000 78,000 35 Trans Concurrency 20,000 40,000 10,000 10,000 10,000 10,000 100,000 36 Missing Links Program 30,000 30,000 30,000 90,000 37 GIS Needs Assessment 35,000 20,000 20,000 75,000 38 Grady Wy Corridor Study 50,000 50,000 39 Bicycle Route Dev.Program 20,000 18,000 18,000 56,000 40 Lake Wash.By-Park to Coulon Pk 41 Environmental Monitoring 20,000 25,000 17,500 12,500 10,000 15,000 100,000 42 Trans-Valley&Soos Creek Corr. 5,000 5,000 5,000 15,000 43 WSDOT Coordination Program 15,000 15,000 15,000 10,000 10,000 10,000 75,000 44 1%for the Arts 60,000 30,000 30,000 50,000 30,000 30,000 230,000 45 Arterial HOV Program 5,000 5,000 10,000 46 Benson Rd S/S 31st Signal 44,200 44,200 47 Park-Sunset Corridor 90,000 90,000 48 Lind Av-SW 16th-SW43rd 49 SR 169 HOV-140th to SR900 200,000 200,000 50 Sunset/DuvallIntersection 30,000 30,000 51 Logan Av Concrete Panel Repair 52 Carr/Mill Signal 5,000 10,000 20,000 35,000 53 Houser Wy S-Main to Burnett 54 Duvall Ave NE-King County Total Sources 1,600,000 1,600,000 3,376,500 1,309,500 897,000 817,000 9,600,000 Buoiners_lice 4-4 DRAFT Note: $1,776,500 shown in 2009 is anticipated in 2010,2011 and 2012($290,500,$703,000,and$783,000 respectively). CITY OF RENTON PLANNING/BUILDING/PUBLIC WORKS TRANSPORTATION SYSTEMS DIVISION 2007-2012 SIX-YEAR TIP Use of Fund Balance Period TIP Project Title 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 Total 1 Street Overlay Program 80,000 80,000 80,000 240,000 2 Intersection Safety&Mobility 200,000 200,000 400,000 3 SW 27th St/Strander By Connect. 4 NE 3rd/NE 4th Corridor 33,200 33,200 5 Renton Urban Shuttle(RUSH) 6 Transit Program 7 Rainier Av Corridor Study/lmprov. 8 Rainier Av-S 4th PI to S 2nd 386,300 147,500 273,300 807,100 9 Hardie Av SW Transit/Multi-modal 311,927 761,300 194,000 1,267,227 10 Walkway Program 193,945 150,000 343,945 11 Rainier Av-SW 7th to 4th PI 2,279,000 312,682 2,591,682 12 Ripley Lane 13 S Lake Wash.Roadway lmprov. 14 Garden Av N Widening 15 South Renton Project 16 1-405 Improvements in Renton 17 Project Development/Predesign 50,000 50,000 25,000 125,000 18 NE 4th St/Hoquiam Av NE 19 Arterial Circulation Program 20 Bridge Inspection&Repair 65,000 35,000 15,000 115,000 21 May Creek Bridge Replacement 66,000 66,000 22 Loop Replacement Program 23 Sign Replacement Program 24 Pole Program 25 Sound Transit HOV Direct Access ''41.9' 26 Traffic Safety Program 5,000 5,000 27 Traffic Efficiency Program 28 CBD Bike&Ped.Connections 29 S 3rd St and Shattuck Av 30 School Zone Sign Upgrades 31 Arterial Rehab.Prog. 185,000 210,000 50,000 445,000 32 Duvall Ave NE 410,000 168,300 578,300 33 RR Crossing Safety Prog. 34 TDM Program 35 Trans Concurrency 36 Missing Links Program 37 GIS Needs Assessment 38 Grady Wy Corridor Study 39 Bicycle Route Dev.Program 40 Lake Wash.By-Park to Coulon Pk 41 Environmental Monitoring 42 Trans-Valley&Soos Creek Corr. 43 WSDOT Coordination Program 44 1%for the Arts 45 Arterial HOV Program 46 Benson Rd S/S 31st Signal 305,800 305,800 47 Park-Sunset Corridor 48 Lind Av-SW 16th-SW43rd 49 SR 169 HOV-140th to SR900 50,000 50,000 50 Sunset/Duvall Intersection 51 Logan Av Concrete Panel Repair 52 Carr/Mill Signal 53 Houser Wy S-Main to Burnett 54 Duvall Ave NE-King County Total Sources 4,537,972 2,164,782 670,500 7,373,254 Proposed Fund 6.wo:. OW27I2006 622 Nor 4-5 DRAFT CITY OF RENTON PLANNING/BUILDING/PUBLIC WORKS TRANSPORTATION SYSTEMS DIVISION 2007-2012 SIX-YEAR TIP Grants In-Hand Period TIP Project Title 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 Total 1 Street Overlay Program 2 Intersection Safety&Mobility 3 SW 27th St/Strander By Connect 5,107,100 4,738,000 271,600 10,116,700 4 NE 3rd/NE 4th Corridor 5 Renton Urban Shuttle(RUSH) 6 Transit Program 7 Rainier Av Corridor Study/Improv. 8 Rainier Av-S 4th PI to S 2nd 30,000 70,000 100,000 200,000 9 Hardie Av SW Transit/Multi-modal 22,500 127,500 150,000 10 Walkway Program 11 Rainier Av-SW 7th to 4th PI 150,000 1,000,000 964,482 2,114,482 12 Ripley Lane 13 S Lake Wash.Roadway Improv. 2,054,314 2,054,314 14 Garden Av N Widening 15 South Renton Project 16 1-405 Improvements in Renton 17 Project Development/Predesign 18 NE 4th St/Hoquiam Av NE 19 Arterial Circulation Program 20 Bridge Inspection&Repair 21 May Creek Bridge Replacement 22 Loop Replacement Program 23 Sign Replacement Program 24 Pole Program 25 Sound Transit HOV Direct Access 26 Traffic Safety Program 27 Traffic Efficiency Program 28 CBD Bike&Ped.Connections 29 S 3rd St and Shattuck Av 155,000 155,000 30 School Zone Sign Upgrades 31 Arterial Rehab.Prog. 32 Duvall Ave NE 1,190,000 315,500 1,505,500 33 RR Crossing Safety Prog. 34 TDM Program 35 Trans Concurrency 36 Missing Links Program 37 GIS Needs Assessment 38 Grady Wy Corridor Study 39 Bicycle Route Dev.Program 100,000 100,000 40 Lake Wash.By-Park to Coulon Pk 40,000 38,425 78,425 41 Environmental Monitoring 42 Trans-Valley&Soos Creek Corr. 43 WSDOT Coordination Program 44 1%for the Arts 45 Arterial HOV Program 46 Benson Rd S/S 31st Signal 47 Park-Sunset Corridor 48 Lind Av-SW 16th-SW43rd 49 SR 169 HOV-140th to SR900 50 Sunset/Duvall Intersection 51 Logan Av Concrete Panel Repair 52 Carr/Mill Signal 53 Houser Wy S-Main to Burnett 54 Duvall Ave NE-King County Total Sources 8,808,914 5,251,000 1,100,000 1,004,482 310,025 16,474,421 Grantaln4land 4-6 DRAFT CITY OF RENTON PLANNING/BUILDING/PUBLIC WORKS Naive TRANSPORTATION SYSTEMS DIVISION 2007-2012 SIX-YEAR TIP Mitigation In-Hand Period TIP Project Title 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 Total 1 Street Overlay Program 2 Intersection Safety&Mobility 3 SW 27th St/Strander By Connect. 584,900 1,068,000 229,600 1,882,500 4 NE 3rd/NE 4th Corridor 145,000 200,000 345,000 5 Renton Urban Shuttle(RUSH) 6 Transit Program 7 Rainier Av Corridor Study/Improv. 8 Rainier Av-S 4th PI to S 2nd 100,000 100,000 475,300 675,300 9 Hardie Av SW Transit/Multi-modal 335,052 608,700 943,752 10 Walkway Program 56,055 56,055 11 Rainier Av-SW 7th to 4th PI 100,000 100,000 200,000 12 Ripley Lane 500,000 500,000 13 S Lake Wash.Roadway Improv. 14 Garden Av N Widening 1,000,000 1,000,000 15 South Renton Project 16 1-405 Improvements in Renton 30,000 10,000 20,000 60,000 17 Project Development/Predesign 18 NE 4th St/Hoquiam Av NE 9,600 9,600 19 Arterial Circulation Program 20 Bridge Inspection&Repair 21 May Creek Bridge Replacement 22 Loop Replacement Program 23 Sign Replacement Program 24 Pole Program 25 Sound Transit HOV Direct Access 1fir► 26 Traffic Safety Program 27 Traffic Efficiency Program 28 CBD Bike&Ped.Connections 29 S 3rd St and Shattuck Av 55,000 55,000 30 School Zone Sign Upgrades 31 Arterial Rehab.Prog. 80,000 80,000 32 Duvall Ave NE 100,000 100,000 200,000 33 RR Crossing Safety Prog. 34 TDM Program 35 Trans Concurrency 36 Missing Links Program 37 GIS Needs Assessment 38 Grady Wy Corridor Study 50,000 50,000 100,000 39 Bicycle Route Dev.Program 40 Lake Wash.By-Park to Coulon Pk 41 Environmental Monitoring 55,000 25,000 12,500 2,500 95,000 42 Trans-Valley&Soos Creek Corr. 43 WSDOT Coordination Program 44 1%for the Arts 45 Arterial HOV Program 46 Benson Rd S/S 31st Signal 47 Park-Sunset Corridor 25,000 50,000 110,000 185,000 48 Lind Av-SW 16th-SW43rd 5,000 5,000 10,000 49 SR 169 HOV-140th to SR900 30,000 140,000 170,000 50 Sunset/Duvall Intersection 51 Logan Av Concrete Panel Repair 52 Carr/Mill Signal 53 Houser Wy S-Main to Burnett 54 Duvall Ave NE-King County Total Sources 3,035,607 2,261,700 817,800 452,100 6,567,207 Mme--ktlanci 07272008 622 Now 4-7 DRAFT CITY OF RENTON PLANNING/BUILDING/PUBLIC WORKS TRANSPORTATION SYSTEMS DIVISION 2007-2012 SIX-YEAR TIP Bonds/L.I.D.'s Formed* Period TIP Project Title 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 Total 1 Street Overlay Program 2 Intersection Safety&Mobility 3 SW 27th St/Strander By Connect. 4 NE 3rd/NE 4th Corridor 5 Renton Urban Shuttle(RUSH) 6 Transit Program 7 Rainier Av Corridor Study/Improv. 8 Rainier Av-S 4th PI to S 2nd 9 Hardie Av SW Transit/Multi-modal 10 Walkway Program 11 Rainier Av-SW 7th to 4th PI 12 Ripley Lane 13 S Lake Wash.Roadway Improv. 9,461,286 9,461,286 14 Garden Av N Widening 15 South Renton Project 16 1-405 Improvements in Renton 17 Project Development/Predesign 18 NE 4th St/Hoquiam Av NE 19 Arterial Circulation Program 20 Bridge Inspection&Repair 21 May Creek Bridge Replacement 22 Loop Replacement Program 23 Sign Replacement Program 24 Pole Program 25 Sound Transit HOV Direct Access 26 Traffic Safety Program 27 Traffic Efficiency Program 28 CBD Bike&Ped.Connections 29 S 3rd St and Shattuck Av 30 School Zone Sign Upgrades 31 Arterial Rehab.Prog. 32 Duvall Ave NE 33 RR Crossing Safety Prog. 34 TDM Program 35 Trans Concurrency 36 Missing Links Program 37 GIS Needs Assessment 38 Grady Wy Corridor Study 39 Bicycle Route Dev.Program 40 Lake Wash.By-Park to Coulon Pk 41 Environmental Monitoring 42 Trans-Valley&Soos Creek Corr. 43 WSDOT Coordination Program 44 1%for the Arts 45 Arterial HOV Program 46 Benson Rd S/S 31st Signal 47 Park-Sunset Corridor 48 Lind Av-SW 16thSW43rd 49 SR 169 HOV-140th to SR900 50 Sunset/Duvall Intersection 51 Logan Av Concrete Panel Repair 52 Carr/Mill Signal 53 Houser Wy S-Main to Burnett 54 Duvall Ave NE-King County Total Sources 9,461,286 9,461,286 BOMYUDY Famed 07/27/2006 622 4-8 DRAFT ‘410 ; •Bonding in process;no L.I.D.s formed. CITY OF RENTON PLANNING/BUILDING/PUBLIC WORKS TRANSPORTATION SYSTEMS DIVISION 2007-2012 SIX-YEAR TIP Other-in-Hand Period TIP Project Title 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 Total 1 Street Overlay Program 2 Intersection Safety&Mobility 3 SW 27th St/Strander By Connect. 530,000 577,000 3,393,000 4,500,000 4 NE 3rd/NE 4th Corridor 5 Renton Urban Shuttle(RUSH) 6 Transit Program 7 Rainier Av Corridor Study/Improv. 8 Rainier Av-S 4th PI to S 2nd 627,900 323,200 1,777,200 2,728,300 9 Hardie Av SW Transit/Multi-modal 3,359,000 6,450,000 1,291,000 11,100,000 10 Walkway Program 11 Rainier Av-SW 7th to 4th PI 12 Ripley Lane 13 S Lake Wash.Roadway Improv. 838,100 838,100 14 Garden Av N Widening 15 South Renton Project 75,000 75,000 16 1-405 Improvements in Renton 17 Project Development/Predesign 18 NE 4th St/Hoquiam Av NE 19 Arterial Circulation Program 20 Bridge Inspection&Repair 21 May Creek Bridge Replacement 22 Loop Replacement Program 23 Sign Replacement Program 24 Pole Program 25 Sound Transit HOV Direct Access visor - 26 Traffic Safety Program 27 Traffic Efficiency Program 28 CBD Bike&Ped.Connections 29 S 3rd St and Shattuck Av 30 School Zone Sign Upgrades 31 Arterial Rehab.Prog. 500,000 500,000 32 Duvall Ave NE 33 RR Crossing Safety Prog. 34 TDM Program 42,000 42,000 42,000 42,000 42,000 42,000 252,000 35 Trans Concurrency 36 Missing Links Program 37 GIS Needs Assessment 38 Grady Wy Corridor Study 39 Bicycle Route Dev.Program 40 Lake Wash.By-Park to Coulon Pk 41 Environmental Monitoring 42 Trans-Valley&Soos Creek Corr. 43 WSDOT Coordination Program 44 1%for the Arts 45 Arterial HOV Program 46 Benson Rd S/S 31st Signal 47 Park-Sunset Corridor 48 Lind Av-SW 16th-SW43rd 49 SR 169 HOV-140th to SR900 2,500,000 2,500,000 50 Sunset/Duvall Intersection 51 Logan Av Concrete Panel Repair 52 Carr/Mill Signal 53 Houser Wy S-Main to Burnett 54 Duvall Ave NE-King County 1,975,000 636,300 2,611,300 Total Sources 7,447,000 9,951,500 3,610,200 619,000 3,435,000 42,000 25,104,700 on.r ti woe mmrzms a a 4-9 DRAFT arm CITY OF RENTON PLANNING/BUILDING/PUBLIC WORKS TRANSPORTATION SYSTEMS DIVISION 2007-2012 SIX-YEAR TIP Grants Proposed Period TIP Project Title 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 Total 1 Street Overlay Program 2 Intersection Safety&Mobility 3 SW 27th St/Strander By Connect. 4 NE 3rd/NE 4th Corridor 5 Renton Urban Shuttle(RUSH) 6 Transit Program 7 Rainier Av Corridor Study/Improv. 8 Rainier Av-S 4th PI to S 2nd 9 Hardie Av SW Transit/Multi-modal 10 Walkway Program 11 Rainier Av-SW 7th to 4th PI 12 Ripley Lane 13 S Lake Wash.Roadway Improv. 14 Garden Av N Widening 15 South Renton Project 16 1-405 Improvements in Renton 17 Project Development/Predesign 18 NE 4th St/Hoquiam Av NE 19 Arterial Circulation Program 20 Bridge Inspection&Repair 21 May Creek Bridge Replacement 484,000 160,000 5,000 649,000 22 Loop Replacement Program 23 Sign Replacement Program 24 Pole Program 25 Sound Transit HOV Direct Access 26 Traffic Safety Program '4 1111101 27 Traffic Efficiency Program 28 CBD Bike&Ped.Connections 29 S 3rd St and Shattuck Av 30 School Zone Sign Upgrades 31 Arterial Rehab.Prog. 32 Duvall Ave NE 33 RR Crossing Safety Prog. 34 TDM Program 35 Trans Concurrency 36 Missing Links Program 37 GIS Needs Assessment 38 Grady Wy Corridor Study 39 Bicycle Route Dev.Program 40 Lake Wash.By-Park to Coulon Pk 41 Environmental Monitoring 42 Trans-Valley&Soos Creek Corr. 43 WSDOT Coordination Program 44 1%for the Arts 45 Arterial HOV Program 46 Benson Rd S/S 31st Signal 47 Park-Sunset Corridor 48 Lind Av-SW 16th-SW43rd 630,000 200,000 830,000 49 SR 169 HOV-140th to SR900 50 Sunset/Duvall Intersection 51 Logan Av Concrete Panel Repair 52 Carr/Mill Signal 53 Houser Wy S-Main to Burnett 54 Duvall Ave NE-King County Total Sources 484,000 160,000 5,000 630,000 200,000 1,479,000 *_p^ww+ 072112006 622 4-10 DRAFT CITY OF RENTON PLANNING/BUILDING/PUBLIC WORKS TRANSPORTATION SYSTEMS DIVISION 2007-2012 SIX-YEAR TIP Mitigation Proposed Period TIP Project Title 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 Total 1 Street Overlay Program 2 Intersection Safety&Mobility 3 SW 27th St/Strander By Connect. 4 NE 3rd/NE 4th Corridor 5 Renton Urban Shuttle(RUSH) 6 Transit Program 7 Rainier Av Corridor Study/Improv. 8 Rainier Av-S 4th PI to S 2nd 9 Hardie Av SW Transit/Multi-modal 10 Walkway Program 11 Rainier Av-SW 7th to 4th PI 12 Ripley Lane 13 S Lake Wash.Roadway Improv. 14 Garden Av N Widening 15 South Renton Project 16 1-405 Improvements in Renton 17 Project Development/Predesign 18 NE 4th St/Hoquiam Av NE 19 Arterial Circulation Program 20 Bridge Inspection&Repair 21 May Creek Bridge Replacement 22 Loop Replacement Program 23 Sign Replacement Program 24 Pole Program 25 Sound Transit HOV Direct Access r 26 Traffic Safety Program 27 Traffic Efficien y Program 28 CBD Bike&Ped.Connections 29 S 3rd St and Shattuck Av 30 School Zone Sign Upgrades 31 Arterial Rehab.Prog. 32 Duvall Ave NE 33 RR Crossing Safety Prog. 34 TDM Program 35 Trans Concurrency 36 Missing Links Program 37 GIS Needs Assessment 38 Grady Wy Corridor Study 39 Bicycle Route Dev.Program 40 Lake Wash.By-Park to Coulon Pk 41 Environmental Monitoring 42 Trans-Valley&Soos Creek Corr. 43 WSDOT Coordination Program 44 1%for the Arts 45 Arterial HOV Program 46 Benson Rd S/S 31st Signal 47 Park-Sunset Corridor 48 Lind Av-SW 16th-SW43rd 49 SR 169 HOV-140th to SR900 50 Sunset/Duvall Intersection 51 Logan Av Concrete Panel Repair 52 Carr/Mill Signal 53 Houser Wy S-Main to Burnett 54 Duvall Ave NE-King County Total Sources _ 66066666 6l66666d 07/27/2006 622 ''t1rrie 4-11 DRAFT CITY OF RENTON PLANNING/BUILDING/PUBLIC WORKS TRANSPORTATION SYSTEMS DIVISION 2007-2012 SIX-YEAR TIP L.I.D.'s Proposed Period TIP Project Title 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 Total 1 Street Overlay Program 2 Intersection Safety&Mobility 3 SW 27th St/Strander By Connect. 4 NE 3rd/NE 4th Corridor 5 Renton Urban Shuttle(RUSH) 6 Transit Program 7 Rainier Av Corridor Study!Improv. 8 Rainier Av-S 4th PI to S 2nd 9 Hardie Av SW Transit/Multi-modal 10 Walkway Program 11 Rainier Av-SW 7th to 4th PI 12 Ripley Lane 13 S Lake Wash.Roadway Improv. 14 Garden Av N Widening 15 South Renton Project 16 1-405 Improvements in Renton 17 Project Development/Predesign 18 NE 4th St/Hoquiam Av NE 19 Arterial Circulation Program 20 Bridge Inspection&Repair 21 May Creek Bridge Replacement 22 Loop Replacement Program 23 Sign Replacement Program 24 Pole Program 25 Sound Transit HOV Direct Access 26 Traffic Safety Program 27 Traffic Efficiency Program 28 CBD Bike&Ped.Connections 29 S 3rd St and Shattuck Av 30 School Zone Sign Upgrades 31 Arterial Rehab.Prog. 32 Duvall Ave NE 33 RR Crossing Safety Prog. 34 TDM Program 35 Trans Concurrency 36 Missing Links Program 37 GIS Needs Assessment 38 Grady Wy Corridor Study 39 Bicycle Route Dev.Program 40 Lake Wash.By-Park to Coulon Pk 41 Environmental Monitoring 42 Trans-Valley&Soos Creek Corr. 43 WSDOT Coordination Program 44 1%for the Arts 45 Arterial HOV Program 46 Benson Rd S/S 31st Signal 47 Park-Sunset Corridor 48 Lind Av-SW 16th-SW43rd 49 SR 169 HOV-140th to SR900 50 Sunset/Duvall Intersection 51 Logan Av Concrete Panel Repair 52 Carr/Mill Signal 53 Houser Wy S-Main to Burnett 54 Duvall Ave NE-King County Total Sources les_P,.p s.d 07/21/2000 6 22 4-12 DRAFT CITY OF RENTON PLANNING/BUILDING/PUBLIC WORKS TRANSPORTATION SYSTEMS DIVISION 2007-2012 SIX-YEAR TIP Other Proposed Period TIP Project Title 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 Total 1 Street Overlay Program 2 Intersection Safety&Mobility 3 SW 27th St/Strander By Connect. 4 NE 3rd/NE 4th Corridor 5 Renton Urban Shuttle(RUSH) 6 Transit Program 7 Rainier Av Corridor Study/Improv. 8 Rainier Av-S 4th PI to S 2nd 9 Hardie Av SW Transit/Multi-modal 10 Walkway Program 11 Rainier Av-SW 7th to 4th PI 12 Ripley Lane 13 S Lake Wash.Roadway Improv. 14 Garden Av N Widening 15 South Renton Project 16 1-405 Improvements in Renton 17 Project Development/Predesign 18 NE 4th St/Hoquiam Av NE 19 Arterial Circulation Program 20 Bridge Inspection&Repair 21 May Creek Bridge Replacement 22 Loop Replacement Program 23 Sign Replacement Program 24 Pole Program 25 Sound Transit HOV Direct Access NNW' 26 Traffic Safety Program 27 Traffic Efficiency Program 28 CBD Bike&Ped.Connections 29 S 3rd St and Shattuck Av 30 School Zone Sign Upgrades 31 Arterial Rehab.Prog. 32 Duvall Ave NE 33 RR Crossing Safety Prog. 34 TDM Program 35 Trans Concurrency 36 Missing Links Program 37 GIS Needs Assessment 38 Grady Wy Corridor Study 39 Bicycle Route Dev.Program 40 Lake Wash.By-Park to Coulon Pk 41 Environmental Monitoring 42 Trans-Valley&Soos Creek Corr. 43 WSDOT Coordination Program 44 1%for the Arts 45 Arterial HOV Program 46 Benson Rd S/S 31st Signal 47 Park-Sunset Corridor 48 Lind Av-SW 16th-SW43rd 49 SR 169 HOV-140th to SR900 50 Sunset/Duvall Intersection 51 Logan Av Concrete Panel Repair 52 Carr/Mill Signal 53 Houser Wy S-Main to Burnett 480,000 480,000 54 Duvall Ave NE-King County Total Sources 480,000 480,000 °pi�1°p0i0 07/21/2008622 4-13 DRAFT CITY OF RENTON PLANNING/BUILDING/PUBLIC WORKS TRANSPORTATION SYSTEMS DIVISION 2007-2012 SIX-YEAR TIP Undetermined Period TIP Project Title 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 Total 1 Street Overlay Program 35,000 35,000 35,000 105,000 2 Intersection Safety&Mobility 250,000 250,000 250,000 750,000 3 SW 27th St/Strander By Connect. 18,911,400 6,067,700 24,979,100 4 NE 3rd/NE 4th Corridor 4,050,000 1,770,000 3,280,000 9,100,000 5 Renton Urban Shuttle(RUSH) 1,000 1,000 1,000 3,000 6 Transit Program 3,000 3,000 3,000 9,000 7 Rainier Av Corridor Study/Improv. 8 Rainier Av-S 4th PI to S 2nd 9 Hardie Av SW Transit/Multi-modal 10 Walkway Program 100,000 100,000 100,000 300,000 11 Rainier Av-SW 7th to 4th PI 1,217,318 840,518 2,057,836 12 Ripley Lane 13 S Lake Wash.Roadway Improv. 14 Garden Av N Widening 15 South Renton Project 16 1-405 Improvements in Renton 17 Project Development/Predesign 25,000 25,000 25,000 75,000 18 NE 4th St/Hoquiam Av NE 19 Arterial Circulation Program 25,000 75,000 75,000 175,000 20 Bridge Inspection&Repair 10,000 15,000 10,000 35,000 21 May Creek Bridge Replacement 22 Loop Replacement Program 5,000 5,000 5,000 15,000 23 Sign Replacement Program 2,500 2,500 2,500 7,500 24 Pole Program 5,000 5,000 5,000 15,000 25 Sound Transit HOV Direct Access 4,000 4,000 8,000 26 Traffic Safety Program 20,000 20,000 20,000 60,000 27 Traffic Efficiency Program 28 CBD Bike&Ped.Connections 45,000 45,000 45,000 135,000 29 S 3rd St and Shattuck Av 30 School Zone Sign Upgrades 31 Arterial Rehab.Prog. 25,000 25,000 25,000 75,000 32 Duvall Ave NE 33 RR Crossing Safety Prog. 10,000 10,000 34 TDM Program 35 Trans Concurrency 20,000 20,000 36 Missing Links Program 30,000 30,000 30,000 90,000 37 GIS Needs Assessment 20,000 20,000 20,000 60,000 38 Grady Wy Corridor Study 230,000 1,810,000 1,020,000 3,060,000 39 Bicycle Route Dev.Program 110,000 80,000 80,000 270,000 40 Lake Wash.By-Park to Coulon Pk 44,500 103,175 147,675 41 Environmental Monitoring 15,000 15,000 15,000 45,000 42 Trans-Valley&Soos Creek Corr. 43 WSDOT Coordination Program 44 1%for the Arts 45 Arterial HOV Program 46 Benson Rd S/S 31st Signal 47 Park-Sunset Corridor 1,750,100 1,010,000 2,760,100 48 Lind Av-SW 16th-SW43rd 1,284,000 426,000 1,710,000 49 SR 169 HOV-140th to SR900 50 Sunset/Duvall Intersection 51 Logan Av Concrete Panel Repair 460,000 460,000 52 Carr/Mill Signal 340,000 400,000 10,000 750,000 53 Houser Wy S-Main to Burnett 330,000 330,000 54 Duvall Ave NE-King County Total Sources 1,217,318 10,059,618 25,206,075 11,134,200 47,617,211 U^fundid_Swn 0712112009 922 4-14 DRAFT Nome SECTION FIVE PROJECT DESCRIPTIONS • Summary of TIP Projects & Costs 5-la • Detailed Project Descriptions 5-1 to 5-54 CITY OF RENTON PLANNING I BUILDING/PUBLIC WORKS TRANSPORTATION SYSTEMS DIVISION 2007-2012 SIX-YEAR TIP Total Project Costs _ Previous Six-Year Total Total Total TIP Project Title Costs 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 Period Total Cost Funded Unfunded t Street Overlay Program 1,359,326 485,000 485,000 485,000 485,000 485,000 485,000 2,910,000 4,269,326 4,164,326 105,000 2 Intersection Safety&Mobility 250,000 250,000 250,000 250,000 250,000 1,250,000 1,250,000 500,000 750,000 3 SW 27th St/Strander By Connect. 5,501,001 6,222,000 5,816,000 10,000 1,096,600 22,576,000 6,067,700 41,788,300 47,289,301 22,310,201 24,979,100 a NE 3rd/NE 4th Corridor 532,862 102,000 230,000 320,000 4,050,000 1,770,000 3,280,000 9,752,000 10,284,862 1,184,862 9,100,000 5 Renton Urban Shuttle(RUSH) 6,361 5,000 5,000 5,000_ 5,000 5,000 5,000 30,000 36,361 33,361 3,000 6 Transit Program 34,714 30,000 18,000 18,000- 18,000 18,000 18,000 18,000 120,000 154,714 145,714 9,000 7 Rainier Av Corridor Study/Improv. 302,913 10,000 10,000 5,000 5,000 5,000 35,000 337,913 337,913 8 Rainier Av-S 4th PI to S 2nd 597,000 1,220,000 698,000 3,795,000 5,713,000 6,310,000 6,310,000 9 Hardie Av SW Transit/Multi-modal 1,168,521 4,228,479 8,290,000 1,650,000 14,168,479 15,337,000 15,337,000 10 Walkway Program 749,032 350,000 250,000 250,000 250,000 250,000 250,000 1,600,000 2,349,032 2,049,032 300,000 11 Rainier Av-SW 7th to 4th P1 1,160,655 2,629,000 1,650,000 1,925,000 1,925,000 8,129,000 9,289,655 7,231,819 2,057,836 12 Ripley Lane 500,000 500,000 500,000 500,000 13 S Lake Wash.Roadway Improv. 12,837,714 12,353,700 12,353,700 25,191,414 25,191,414 1a Garden Av N Widening 1,000,000 1,000,000 1,000,000 1,000,000 15 South Renton Project 647,580 75,000 75,000 722,580 722,580 16 1-406 Improvements In Renton 98,385 30,000 30,000 30,000 10,000 10,000 10,000 120,000 218,385 218,385 17 Project Development/Predeslgn 322,592 225,000 225,000 225,000 200,000 200,000 200,000 1,275,000 1,597,592 1,522,592 75,000 18 NE 4th SUHoqulam Av NE 390,400 9,600 9,600 400,000 400,000 19 Arterial Circulation Program 260,680 200,000 200,000 200,000 200,000 250,000 250,000 1,300,000 1,560,680 1,385,680 175,000 20 Bridge Inspection&Repair 264,581 105,000 75,000 55,000 50,000 55,000 50,000 390,000 654,581 619,581 35,000 21 May Creek Bridge Replacement 120,000 550,000 160,000 5,000 715,000 835,000 186,000 649,000 22 Loop Replacement Program 40,105 15,000 15,000 15,000 20,000 20,000 20,000 105,000 145,105 130,105 15,000 23 Sign Replacement Program 11,255 5,000 5,000 5,000 7,500 7,500 7,500 37,500 48,755 41,255 7,500 24 Pole Program 37,954 20,000 20,000 20,000 25,000 25,000 25,000 135,000- 172,954 157,954 15,000 25 Sound Transit HOV Direct Access 71,910 4,000 4,000 4,000 12,000 83,910 75,910 8,000 26 Traffic Safety Program 146,734 25,000 20,000 20,000 40,000 40,000 40,000 185,000 331,734 271,734 60,000 27 Traffic Efficiency Program 344,924 55,000 50,000 50,000 30,000 30,000 30,000 245,000 589,924 589,924 28 CBD Bike&Ped.Connections 131,544 50,000 50,000 50,000 50,000 50,000 50,000 300,000 431,544 296,544 135,000 29 S 3rd St and Shattuck Av 45,000 255,000 255,000 300,000 300,000 30 School Zone Sign Upgrades 100,000 100,000 100,000200,000 300,000 300,000 31 Arterial Rehab.Prog. 435,000 240,000 360,000 760,000 200,000 200,000 200,000 1,960,000 2,395,000 2,320,000 75,000 32 Duvall Ave NE 2,668,200 1,700,000 600,000 2,300,000 4,968,200 4,968,200 33 RR Crossing Safety Prog. 5,240 5,000 10,000 10,000 25,000 30,240 20,240 10,000 34 TDM Program 108,475 55,000 55,000 55,000 55,000 55,000 55,000 330,000 438,475 438,475 35 Trans Concurrency 40,000 20,000 40,000 10,000 10,000 30,000 10,000 120,000 160,000 140,000 20,000 36 Missing Links Program 30,380 30,000 30,000 30,000 30,000 30,000 30,000 180,000 210,380 120,380 90,000 37 GIS Needs Assessment 41,700 35,000 20,000 20,000 20,000 20,000 20,000 135,000 176,700 116,700 60,000 38 Grady Wy Corridor Study 63,421 50,000 50,000 50,000 230,000 1,810,000 1,020,000 3,210,000 3,273,421 213,421 3,060,000 39 Bicycle Route Dev.Program 30,701 120,000 18,000 18,000 110,000 80,000 80,000 426,000 456,701 186,701 270,000 ao Lake Wash.By-Park to Coulon Pk 323,138 84,500 141,600 226,100 549,238 401,563 147,675 41 Environmental Monitoring 159,635 75,000 50,000 30,000 30,000 30,000 30,000 245,000 404,635 359,635 45,000 42 Trans Valley&Soos Creek Corr. 12,539 5,000 5,000 5,000 15,000 27,539 27,539 43 WSDOT Coordination Program 23,600 15,000 15,000 15,000 10,000 10,000 10,000 75,000 98,600 98,600 44 -1%for the Arts 75,669 60,000 30,000 30,000 50,000 30,000 30,000 230,000 305,669 305,669 45 Arterial HOV Program 132,354 5,000 5,000 10,000 142,354 142,354 a6 Benson Rd S/S 31st Signal 350,000 350,000 350,000 350,000 47 Park-Sunset Corridor 64,904 25,000 50,000 200,000 1,750,100 1,010,000 3,035,100 3,100,004_ 339,904 2,760,100 48 Lind Av-SW 16th-SW43rd 5,000 5,000 5,000 1,914,000 626,000 2,550,000 2,555,000 15,000 2,540,000 49 SR 169 HOV-140th to SR900 6,110,597 30,000 2,550,000 340,000 2,920,000 9,030,597 9,030,597 50 Sunset/Duvall Intersection 1,668,000, 30,000 30,000 1,698,000 1,698,000 51 Logan Av Concrete Panel Repair 460,000 460,000 460,000 460,000 52 Carr/Mill Signal 3,000 5,000 10,000 20,000 340,000 400,000 10,000, 785,000 788,000 38,000 750,000 53 Houser Wy S-Main to Burnett 810,000 810,000 810,000 810,000 54 Duvall Ave NE-King County 1,982,646 1,975,000 636,300 2,611,300 4,593,946 4,593,94 Sources 41,267,941 36,939,779 23,191,300 10,386 15,164,700 30,623,100 12,643,200 127,747,079 169,016,020 119,438,80 9.676,211 - o7?37Q iu Total PI P a V , A. ,,,DRAFT ( ( ( CITY OF RENTON PLANNING/BUILDING/PUBLIC WORKS TRANSPORTATION SYSTEMS DIVISION 2007 -2012 SIX-YEAR TIP Street Overlay Program Functional Classification: N/A Fund: 317 Proj.Length: N/A Proj: 12108 Type: 1 -INFRASTRUCTURE RANK: 1 CONTACT: Bill Wressell 425.430.7400 DESCRIPTION: STATUS: Annual program for repairing and resurfacing existing roadways,operating the City's Pavement Ongoing yearly program. This program funds overlays on neighborhood streets and Management System and providing data for deficiency ratings. collector streets. The Arterial Rehabilitation Program funds major and minor arterials. Funding in 2005 and 2006 were increased to cover the major patching needed in the Victoria Park neighborhood and the increased oil costs. JUSTIFICATION: CHANGES: ACP overlay,SMA,and slurry seal of streets provide for improved driving surface and are highly cost Installation of ADA compliant curb ramps has been incorporated into the annual Street effective ways of avoiding expensive repairs and reconstruction. The computerized Pavement Overlay and Arterial Rehabilitation programs according to new federal requirements. Management System and yearly survey of roadway conditions greatly improve the efficiency of the Overlay Program. The arterial streets are rated in odd years(2007,2009,etc.)and all other streets are rated in even years(2008,2010,etc.). 'Funded : L4,164326 LUnfunded : 1 105,000, Project Totals Programmed Pre-2007 Six-Year Program ITEM Programmed, Spent In 2005 2006 _ Total 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 EXPENSES: _ _ Project Development Precon Enq/Admin 92,326 7,326, 13 00072,000 12,000 12,000, 12,000, 12,000 12,000 2 12,000 R-O-W(includes Admin) Construction Contract Fee _ 3,845,03f 553,031 694,000 2,598,000 433,000 433,000 433,000 433,000 433,000 433,000 Construction Eng/Admin 331,969 42,969 49_000 240,000 40,000 40,000 40,000 40,000 40,000 40,000 Other TOTAL EXPENSES 4,269,326 603,326 756,000 2,910,000 485,000 485,000 485,000 485,000 485,000 485,000 SOURCE OF FUNDS: Vehicle Fuel Tax 2,963,500 353,500 350_000 2,260,000 350,000 35Q000 350,000, 350,000 430,000 430,000 Business License Fee 415,000 55,000 55,000 305,000 55,000 55,000, 55,00 100, 000 20,000 20,000 Proposed Fund Balance 785,826 194,826 351,000 240,000 80,000, 80,00 80,000 Grants In-Hand Mitigation In-Hand Bonds/L.I.D.'s Formed Other In-Hand Grants Proposed Mitigation Proposed L.I.D.'s Proposed , Other Proposed _ Undetermined 105,000 105,000 35,000 35,000 35,000 TOTAL SOURCES 4,269,326 603,326_ 756,000 2,910,000 485,000 485,000_ 485,000_ 485,000 485,000 485,000 Overlay 0727/2x08 822 AM 5-1 DRAFT CITY OF RENTON PLANNING/BUILDING/PUBLIC WORKS TRANSPORTATION SYSTEMS DIVISION 2007-2012 SIX-YEAR TIP Intersection Safety& Mobility Program Functional Classification: N/A Fund: 317 Type: 5 OPERATIONS AND SAFETY Proj.Length: N/A Proj: 12601 RANK: 2 CONTACT: Bob Cavanaugh 425.430.7222 DESCRIPTION: STATUS: This program will design and construct traffic signals identified by the transportation system traffic signal The priorities and schedules for new traffic signals will be set by the transportation priority needs list, including intersection improvements. Intersections without signalized traffic control will operations traffic signal warrant priority list The list is determined by citizen concerns, be evaluated. intersection safety, mobility needs, and intersections that meet MUTCD traffic signal warrants. JUSTIFICATION: CHANGES: Historically,on the average,one traffic signal is designed and constructed every two years to meet safety New program. Traffic signals high on the warrant priority list include: SW 41st St.& and mobility needs. This program budgets for projects needed to meet increasing demand,and the need Oakesdale Ave.SW, NE Sunset Blvd.&Hoquiam Ave. NE,S Carr Road&Mill Ave.S., for signalized traffic control. Elements used to prioritize project intersections may include vehicular SW 34th St.&Lind Ave.SW,and S 55th St&Talbot Rd. approach volumes,accident analysis,signal-warrant analysis,and pedestrian volume. 1Funded: 1500,000 (Unfunded : 1750,000 Project Totals Programmed Pre-2007 Six-Year Program ITEM Programmed Spent In 2005 2006 Total 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 EXPENSES: Project Development Precon Enq/Admin 130,000 130,000 26,000, 26,900_ 26,000 26,000 26,000, R-O-W(includes Admin) Construction Contract Fee 1,010,000 1,010,000 202,000 202,000 202,000 202,000 202,000 Construction Eng/Admin 110,000 110,000 , 22,000 22,000 22,000 22,000 22,000 Other TOTAL EXPENSES 1,250,000 1,250,000 250,000 250,000 250,000 250,000 250,000 SOURCE OF FUNDS: Vehicle Fuel Tax Business License Fee 100,000 100,000 50,000 50,000 Proposed Fund Balance 400,000 400,000 200,000 200,000 Grants In-Hand Mitigation In-Hand Bonds/L.I.D.'s Formed _ Other In-Hand . Grants Proposed . Mitigation Proposed _ L.I.D.'s Proposed Other Proposed Undetermined 750,000 750,000 250,000 250,000 250,000 TOTAL SOURCES 1,250,000 1,250,000 250,000 250,000, 250,000 250,000 250,000 Inters e�hry 07272008 em AM 5-2 DRAFT ( ( CITY OF RENTON PLANNING/BUILDING/PUBLIC WORKS TRANSPORTATION SYSTEMS DIVISION 2007-2012 SIX-YEAR TIP SW 27th Street/Strander Boulevard Connection Functional Classification: Minor Arterial Fund: 317 Proj.Length: 1.27 miles Proj: 12239 Type: 4-ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT RANK: 3 CONTACT: Rob Lochmiller 425.430.7303 DESCRIPTION: STATUS: This project provides a critical four/five lane arterial that will serve as a connector to West Valley Highway The 30%design includes the environmental documents,base-mapping, road sections,and (SR-181)and East Valley Road,as well as an arterial connector to SR-167 from the south.The project will project phasing. $1,000,000 was received from the General Fund in 2003. Grants have provide a grade-separated crossing at the Union Pacific Railroad(UPRR)and Burlington Northern Sante included:TEA-21 funds of$745,563(May 2003)and$2,398(May 2005);federal Fe(BNSF)railroad tracks. Segments 1 and 2 include from West Valley Hwy to East Valley Road. discretionary funds of$679,844 and STP-N funds of$94,420 for Ph. 1,Seg.2a 100% Donated right-of-way(not shown below)includes: Boeing-$2.5 million,Tukwila-$1.2 million,Sound design(May 2006). A shared-use detention pond with the developer will lower the costs of Transit-$55,000 in addition to funded right-of-way. construction. New fuel tax shown in 2010. JUSTIFICATION: CHANGES: A new east-west arterial roadway will connect the Cities of Renton and Tukwila,and provide significant 30%design is completed on all phases. Ph. 1,Seg. 1,construction is complete,and will be congestion relief to existing arterials. The new road will provide direct access to the new Tukwila Station, paid for with approximately$3 million in bonds(in process). Both FMSIB and Sound a multi-modal center being developed immediately north of the new alignment,and to the Boeing Transit are contributing$4 million each to various elements of the project. The City was Longacres site. The eventual direct HOV connections to southbound SR-167 will provide significant awarded$684,380 of federal discretionary funds(only$274,760 allocated to-date). advantages to HOV and transit usage. By crossing under the UPRR and BNSF railroads,the new arterial Awaiting decision on$4,600,000 of STP Regional funds. $500,000 Metro mitigation will provide significant benefits to both freight mobility and to general motorists. reserve is pending Council approval. I Funded :1 22,310,2011 Unfunded :1 24,979,100, Project Totals Programmed Pre-2007 Six-Year Program ` ITEM Programmed Spent Pre-2006 2006 Total 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 EXPENSES: _ Project Development 60,000 60,000 10,000 10,000_ 10,000, 10,000 10,000 10,000 Precon Eng/Admin 5,630,958 1,718158 300,000 3,612,800 ', 564,000 1,086,600 1,616,900 345,300 R-O-W(includes Admin) 275,006 275,000 108,000 167,000 Construction Contract Fee 34,202,100 34,202,100 5,250,000 5,333,000_ 18,743,700 4,875,400 Construction Eng/Admin 3,638,400 3,638,400 398,000, 473,000 2,097,400 670,000 Other(Ph.1,Seg.1) 3,482,843_ 997,843 2,485,000 TOTAL EXPENSES 47,289,301 2,716,001 2,785,000 41,788,300 6,222,000 5,816,000 10,000 1,096,600 22,576,000 6,067,700 SOURCES OF FUNDS: l _ Vehicle Fuel Tax 240,006 240,000240,000 Business License Fee 70,000 70,000 10,000, 10,000+ 50,000 Prop.Fund Bal.&Gen.Fund 2003 847,866 547,866 300,000 , Grants In-Hand(State&Fed) 10,860,335 743,635 10,116,700 5,107,100 4,738,000 271,600 Mitigation In-Hand 2,440,000 557,500 1,882,500 584,900 1,068,000 229,600 Bonds/L.I.D.'s Formed 2,799,500 867,000. 1,932,500 , Other In-Hand-Reserves,ST,FRB 5,052,500,552,500 4,500,000 530,000 577,000 3,393,000 Grants Proposed Mitigation Proposed . L.I.D.'s Proposed Other Proposed _ Undetermined 24,979,100 24,979,100 18,911,400 6,067,700 TOTAL SOURCES 47,289,301 2,716,001 _ 2,785,000 41,788,300 6,222,000 5,816,000 10,000 1,096,600 22,576,000 6,067,700 Seminar Connecta, 622 AM 5-3 DRAFT CITY OF RENTON PLANNING/BUILDING/PUBLIC WORKS TRANSPORTATION SYSTEMS DIVISION 2007-2012 SIX-YEAR TIP NE 3rd/NE 4th Corridor Improvements Functional Classification: Principal Fund: 317 176 Type: 2-MULTI-MODAL/TDM Proj. RANK: N/A Proj:it4125.4 4 CONTACT: Keith Woolley 425.430.7318 DESCRIPTION: STATUS: This project involves a series of key improvements in this corridor to improve traffic operations The NE 3rd/4th Corridor Study was adopted May 2005. The study refined the corridor such as rechannelization and traffic signal modifications,possible construction of an eastbound transportation needs and costs, including pedestrian,transit users, bicyclists,as well as hill-climbing lane from Monterey Ave to east of Edmonds Ave,possible transit priority signal streetscape enhancement. Costs shown reflect estimates from the study. treatments and possibly queue jumps. This project will seek to meet pedestrian,transit and bicycle needs. JUSTIFICATION: CHANGES: This corridor has a strong potential for transit usage and is experiencing rapid residential and Efforts to obtain grants are ongoing. The funding shown in years 2007 through 2009 would retail growth. fund design,right-of-way and construction of an intersection improvement project. 2010 through 2012 are unfunded. (Funded: 11,184,862 (Unfunded : 19,100,000 Project Totals Programmed Pre-2007 Six-Year Program ITEM Programmed Spent Pre-2006 2006 Total 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 EXPENSES: Project Development 218,155 216,155 2,000 2,000 Precon Eng/Admin 1,152,707 2,707 100,000 1,050,000 100,000 130,000 400,000 420,000 R-O-W(includes Admin) 1,000,000 1,000,000 100,000 200,000 250,000 250,000 200,000 Construction Contract Fee 7,192,500 192,500 7,000,000100,000 3,100,000 1,000,000 2,800,000 Construction Eng/Admin 721,500 21,500 700000 ` 20,000 300,000 100,000 280,000 Other TOTAL EXPENSES 10,284,862 218,862 314,000 9,752,000 102,000 230,000 320,000 4,050,000 1,770,000 3,280,000 SOURCE OF FUNDS: Vehicle Fuel Tax 277,000, 90,000 187,000 102,000 85,000 , Business License Fee 113,9627,162 86,800 86,800 Proposed Fund Balance 33,200 33,200 33,200 Grants In-Hand Mitigation In-Hand 760,700 191,700 224,000 345,000 145,000 . 200,000 Bonds/L.I.D.'s Formed Other In-Hand Grants Proposed Mitigation Proposed L.I.D.'s Proposed Other Proposed Undetermined 9,100,000 9,100,000 4,050,000' 1,770,000 3,280,000 TOTAL SOURCES 10,284,862 218,862 314,000 9,752,000 102,000_ 230,000 320,000_ 4,050,000 1,770,000 3,280,000 MINN 1.4 NE3N NEH� 0727/1808 822 AMY 5-4 DRAFT ( ( ( . CITY OF RENTON PLANNING/BUILDING/PUBLIC WORKS TRANSPORTATION SYSTEMS DIVISION 2007-2012 SIX-YEAR TIP Renton Urban Shuttle (RUSH) Program Functional Classification: N/A Fund: 317 Proj.Length: N/A Proj: 12163 Type: 2-MULTI-MODAL/TDM RANK: 5 CONTACT: Nathan Jones 425.430.7217 DESCRIPTION: STATUS: The Renton Urban Shuttle(RUSH)is a shuttle bus service provided by King County Metro that runs peak In 2001,Metro assumed full fiscal responsibility for the existing shuttle service. hours between Longacres Multi-modal Commuter Station(where the Sounder train arrives mornings and evenings)and North Renton(Boeing). The City intends to work with Metro and transit consultants to develop this service into a program that delivers greater benefits to Renton area residents and employees. JUSTIFICATION: CHANGES: Congestion relief,increased travel options and economic development are outcomes dependent upon increasing transit patronage in Renton. The RUSH shuttle compliments existing transit service by providing additional local service. !Funded : 133,361 lUnfunded : 13,000 Project Totals Programmed Pre-2007 Six-Year Program ITEM Programmed Spent in 2005 2006 Total 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 EXPENSES: Project Development 36,361 1,361_ 5,000 30,000 5,000 5_,000 5 000 5,000, 5,000 5,000 Precon Eng/Admin R-O-W(includes Admin) Construction Contract Fee Construction Enq/Admin Other(RUSH Contract) TOTAL EXPENSES 36,361 1,3615,000 30,000 5,000 5,000 5,000 5,000, 5,000 5,000 SOURCE OF FUNDS: Vehicle Fuel Tax Business License Fee 33,361 1,361 _ 5,000 27,000 5,000 5_900 5,000- 4,000 4,000 4,000 Proposed Fund Balance _ , Grants In-Hand Mitigation In-Hand _ Bonds/L.I.D.'s Formed Other In-Hand _ Grants Proposed _ Mitigation Proposed _ L.I.D.'s Proposed Other Proposed . Undetermined 3,000 3,000 1,000 1,000 1,000 TOTAL SOURCES 36,361 1,361 5,000 30,000 5,000 5,000 5,000 5,000 5,000 5,000 $ 07/27/2006 622 AM 5-5 DRAFT CITY OF RENTON PLANNING/BUILDING/PUBLIC WORKS TRANSPORTATION SYSTEMS DIVISION 2007-2012 SIX-YEAR TIP Transit Program Functional Classification: N/A Fund: 317 Proj.Length: N/A Proj: 12109 Type: 2-MULTI-MODAL/TDM RANK: 6 CONTACT: Nathan Jones 425.430.7217 DESCRIPTION: STATUS: Determine and provide funding for short-range and long-range transit needs, routes, and facilities, Staff continue to attend regional coordination meetings with transit agencies. Will monitor including park and ride lots, bus shelters,and arterial system improvements required to facilitate transit service and capital facility improvements within Renton,and will pursue and advocate for access. Joint projects with King County Metro and Sound Transit will also be pursued to improve local better-timed arrivals and departures at our major transit facilities. and regional transit service in Renton. Work with transit agencies,community,and businesses for implementation. JUSTIFICATION: CHANGES: Transit improvements are a vital component of the transportation system's ability to absorb future traffic Additional staff time will be required in 2007 to address transit issues. The Regional demand and meet Level-of-Service standards. The City and private developers have invested millions of Transportation Investment District(RTID)and Sound Transit 2(ST2)will go to ballot. King dollars in capital improvements in support of transit-oriented development and services. Transit will be County Metro also has major service planning efforts scheduled. one key in meeting the goals of the downtown area as well as development in other parts of the City. Coordination with Metro and Sound Transit projects and programs will help leverage these funds and increase benefits to Renton. 'Funded: 1145,714 'Unfunded: 19,000 Project Totals Programmed Pre-2007 Six-Year Program ITEM Programmed Spent in 2005 2006 Total 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 EXPENSES: Project Development 154,714 16,714 18,000 120,000 _ 30,000 18,000 18,000 18,000 18,000 18,000 Precon Eng/Admin R-O-W(includes Admin) Construction Contract Fee Construction Eng/Admin Other(Contingency) TOTAL EXPENSES 154,714 16,714 18,000 120,000 30,000 18,000 18,000 18,000 18,000 18,000 SOURCE OF FUNDS: Vehicle Fuel Tax Business License Fee 145,714 16,714 18,000 111,000 30,000 18,000 18,000 15,000 15,000 15,000 Proposed Fund Balance Grants In-Hand Mitigation In-Hand Bonds/L.I.D.'s Formed Other In-Hand Grants Proposed (FTA) Mitigation Proposed L.I.D.'s Proposed Other Proposed Undetermined 9,000 9,000 3,000 3,000 3,000 TOTAL SOURCES 154,714 16,714 18,000 120,000 30,000 18,000 18,000 18,000_ 18,000 18,000 07/27/2006 622 AM rrmwc 5-6 DRAFT (b., k. .. - ( ( ( . CITY OF RENTON PLANNING/BUILDING/PUBLIC WORKS TRANSPORTATION SYSTEMS DIVISION 2007-2012 SIX-YEAR TIP Rainier Ave Corridor Study and Improvements Functional Classification: N/A Fund: 317 Proj.Length: N/A Proj: 12193 Type: 2-MULTI-MODAL/TDM RANK: 7 CONTACT: Nathan Jones 425.430.7217 DESCRIPTION: STATUS: Pre-engineering study to evaluate short-term and long-term traffic flow and safety improvements in this The study was completed in 2005. Two new projects originating from this study were split corridor. Included will be potential for adding HOV lanes,signing and intersection improvements,and off in the 2006 TIP: 1)Hardie Ave.SW Transit/Mulitmodal Improvements and 2)Rainier access control/consolidation of driveways. Ave. Improvements-S 4th PI to S 2nd St. Efforts to obtain funding for improvements are ongoing. JUSTIFICATION: CHANGES: This is a critical corridor serving the central Renton area with existing operational problems and it is Funding for this project has decreased from 2007 to 2011 and is expected to be eliminated projected to experience severe congestion in the future. Potential improvements include those that will by 2012. Minimal funds are needed to coordinate with current construction projects and offer benefits to transit-increased speed,reliability,and ridership-as well as HOV and general WSDOT related improvments. purpose traffic safety improvements. Funded : 1337,913 (Unfunded : f Project Totals Programmed Pre-2007 Six-Year Program ITEM Programmed Spent Pre-2006 2006 Total 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 EXPENSES: Project Development 337,913 290,913 12,000 35,000 10,000 10,000_ 5,000 5,000 5 000 Precon Enq/Admin _ R-O-W(includes Admin) Construction Contract Fee . Construction Eng/Admin Other TOTAL EXPENSES 337,913 290,913 12,000 35,000 10,000 10,000 5,000 5,000 5,000 SOURCE OF FUNDS: __ Vehicle Fuel Tax Business License Fee 186,813 139,813, 12,000 35,000 10,000 10,000 5,000 5,000 5,000 Proposed Fund Balance , Grants In-Hand _ Mitigation In-Hand 151,100 151,100 , Bonds/L.I.D.'s Formed Other In-Hand _ Grants Proposed Mitigation Proposed L.I.D.'s Proposed _ Other Proposed _ Undetermined TOTAL SOURCES 337,913 290,913 12,000 35,000 10,000 10,000_ 5,000 5,000 5,000 Rainer07/27(2009 622 AM 5-7 DRAFT CITY OF RENTON PLANNING/BUILDING/PUBLIC WORKS TRANSPORTATION SYSTEMS DIVISION 2007-2012 SIX-YEAR TIP Rainier Ave. Improvements -S 4th PI to S 2nd St Functional Classification: Principal&Minor Fund: 317 Proj.Length: 0.4 miles Proj: 12501 Type: 2-MULTI-MODAL/TDM RANK: 8 CONTACT: Jason Fritzler 425.430.7243 _ DESCRIPTION: STATUS: Rebuild sidewalks including curb and gutters;add pedestrian-scale illumination,bollards(at crossings), The Sound Transit(ST)local agency agreement has been executed authorizing$14.9 transit facility improvements(shelters, benches, info kiosks), planted buffer strips and landscaped million in design and construction St funds for transit improvements on Rainier Ave.and medians,and eastbound transit queue jump at S 3rd St. Hardie Ave. Design started in June 2006 and will continue through early 2007. JUSTIFICATION: CHANGES: Rainier Ave. is a critical corridor in central Renton with existing operational problems and in need of A state Pedestrian&Bicycle Safety Grant of$200,000 was awarded in 2006. It will be infrasructure enhancements to provide greater ease of non-motorized and transit-based travel. used for non-motorized improvements on this project. This project and the Hardie Ave. project are being designed under one consultant contract. Roadway construction is estimated to start in 2009 and will be coordinated with the Rainier Ave.SW 7th St to 4th PI. construction. I Funded :1 6,310,0001 Unfunded :1 _ Project Totals Programmed Pre-2007 Six Year Program ITEM Programmed Spent In 2005 2006 Total 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 EXPENSES: Project Development Precon Eng/Admin 1,123,000 300,000 823,000 720,000 103,000 , R-O-W(includes Admin) 897,000 297,000 600,000 500,000 100,000 Construction Contract Fee 3,900,000 3,900,000 450,000 3,450,000 Construction Eng/Admin 390,000 390,000 45,000 345,000 Other TOTAL EXPENSES 6,310,000 597,000 5,713,000 1,220,000 698,000 3,795,000 SOURCES OF FUNDS: Vehicle Fuel Tax 38,000 38,000 13,000 25,000 Business License Fee 1,291,500 27,200 1,264,300 62,800 32,300 1,169,200 Proposed Fund Balance 970,100 163,000 807,100 386,300 147,500 273,300 _ Grants In-Hand 200,000 200,000 30,000 70,000 100,000 _ Mitigation In-Hand 810,400 135,100 675,300 100,000 100,000 475,300 Bonds/L.I.D.'s Formed Other In-Hand(Sound Tran.) 3,000,000 271,700 2,728,300 627,900 323,200 1,777,200 _ Grants Proposed Mitigation Proposed L.I.D.'s Proposed Other Proposed(S.Transit) Undetermined TOTAL SOURCES 6,310,000 597,000 5,713,000 1,220,000 698,000 3,795,000 O71271200e 822 AM Niftier ST 5-8 DRAFT (,. ( ( ( CITY OF RENTON PLANNING/BUILDING/PUBLIC WORKS TRANSPORTATION SYSTEMS DIVISION 2007-2012 SIX-YEAR TIP Hardie Ave. SW Transit/Multimodal Improvements Functional Classification: Principal&Minor Fund: 317 Proj.Length: 0.7 miles Proj: 12502 Type: 2-MULTI-MODAL/TDM RANK: 9 CONTACT: Leslie Lahndt 425.430.7223 DESCRIPTION: STATUS: Add Business Access Transit(BAT)lanes in both directions;rebuild the Hardie railroad bridge;add non- The Sound Transit interlocal agreement has been approved for$14.9 million in design and motorized facilities, i.e., multimodal trail, northbound transit-only signal at Rainier and Hardie,and curb, construction funds for Hardie and Rainier projects. The design contract has been gutter,and sidewalks between Sunset Blvd.and Rainier Ave.S. authorized and will continue through early 2007. Hardie Ave.SW will be changed from a collector arterial to a minor arterial. JUSTIFICATION: CHANGES: Regional transit agencies have expressed a desire to partner with the City to design and build systematic A state Pedestrian&Bicycle Safety Grant of$150,000 was awarded in 2006 to be used for transit improvements throughout Renton for the purposes of reducing travel times and improving speed non-motorized improvements. This project is being designed under the same consultant and reliability for routes serving Renton. Additionally,there is a need for improved non-motorized facilities contract as the Rainier Avenue,S 4th PI to S 2nd St, project. Both contain funding from providing north to south connections. There are also safety benefits for all by replacing the substandard Sound Transit. Bridge construction,planned to begin in 2007,will be coordinated with the railroad bridge over Hardie south of SW 5th PI. Rainier Avenue,SW 7th to 4th PI,bridge construction to save construction costs. Roadway construction has a 2008 planned start date. 1 Funded :I_ 15,337,0001 Unfunded :1 Project Totals Programmed Pre-2007 Six Year Program ITEM Programmed Spent In 2005 _ 2006 Total 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 EXPENSES: Project Development - Precon Eng/Admin 1,667,000 91,162 667,000908,838 908 838 R-O-W(includes Adminl 2,000,000 359 410,000_ 1,589,641 999,6.41 590_000 Construction Contract Fee 10,000,000 10,00Q000 s 1_,500,000 7,000,000 1,500,000 Construction Eng/Admin 1,000,000 1,000,000 150,000 700,000 150,000 _ Other 670,000 670,000 670,000 TOTAL EXPENSES 15,337,000' 91,521_ 1,077,000 14,168,479 ' 4,228,479 8,290,000 1,650,000 SOURCES OF FUNDS: Vehicle Fuel Tax 125,000 125,000 125,000 Business License Fee 582,500582,500 200,000 217,500 165,000 Proposed Fund Balance 1,470,848 26,621 177, 000, 1,267,227 311,927 761,300 194,000 Grants In-Hand 150,000 150,000 22,500 127,500 Mitigation In-Hand 1,108,652 64,900 100,000 943,752 335,052 608,700 Bonds/L.I.D.'s Formed Other In-Hand-Sound Transit 11,900,000 800,000 11,100,000 ' 3,359,000 6,450,000_ 1,291,000, Grants Proposed Mitigation Proposed - _ L.I.D's Proposed _ _ Other Proposed Undetermined _ _ TOTAL SOURCES 15,337,000 91,521__ 1,077,000 14,168,479 4,228,479_ 8,290,000__ 1,650,000 Horde 0727/2006 622 AM 5-9 DRAFT CITY OF RENTON PLANNING/BUILDING/PUBLIC WORKS TRANSPORTATION SYSTEMS DIVISION 2007-2012 SIX-YEAR TIP Walkway Program Functional Classification: N/A Fund: 317 Proj.Length: N/A Proj: 9 Type: 3-COMMUNITY LIVABILITY/ENHANCEMENT RANK: 10 CONTACT: Dan Hasty 425.430.7246 DESCRIPTION: STATUS: This program provides for the design and construction of high priority non-motorized transportation The Comprehensive Citywide Walkway Study(2003)is being used to select some of the facilities for pedestrians. Projects will be identified and prioritized in the updated Comprehensive Citywide projects that move into the design and construction phases. Walkway Study and through coordination with the City's Neighborhood Program. JUSTIFICATION: CHANGES: Providing safe and convenient non-motorized facilities is an integral part of a complete transportation The Comprehensive Citywide Walkway Study will be revised in 2007. Completed projects network. Specific improvements will respond to the needs of school children,the aged and persons with will be removed. "Recognized School Walk Routes"will be added to the criteria for project disabilities,and will support increased use of transit. prioritization. The study will also score existing sidewalks that have gone beyond repair and are in need of overhaul. I Funded: 12,049,032 1Unfunded : 1300,000 Project Totals Programmed Pre-2007 Six-Year Program ITEM Programmed Spent in 2005 2006 Total 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 EXPENSES: Project Development 47,439 10,439 5,000 32,000 7,000 5,000 5,000 5,000 5,000 5,000 Precon Eng/Admin 224,487 487 64,000 160,000 35,000 25,000 25,000 25,000 25,000 25,000 R-O-W(includes Admin) Construction Contract Fee 1,921,570 158,370 464,000 1,299,200 284,200 203,000 203,000, 203,000 203,000 203,000 Construction Enq/Admin 155,536 8,736 38,000 108,800 23,800 17,000 17,00 17,000 17,000 17,000 Other TOTAL EXPENSES 2,349,032 178,032 571,000 1,600,000 350,000 250,000 250,000 250,000 250,000 250,000 SOURCE OF FUNDS: Vehicle Fuel Tax Business License Fee 1,119,864 19,864 200,000 900,000 100,000 100,000 250,000 150,000 150,000 150,000 Proposed Fund Balance 514,945 171,000 343,945 193,945 150,000 Grants In-Hand Mitigation In-Hand 265,055 9,000 200,000 56,055 56,055 Bonds/L.I.D.'s Formed Other In-Hand(KC Metro Mit) 149,168, 149,168 Grants Proposed Mitigation Proposed L.I.D's Proposed Other Proposed Undetermined 300,000 300,000 100,000 100,000 100,000 TOTAL SOURCES 2,349,032 178,032 571,000 1,600,000 350,000 250,000 250,000 250,000 250,000 250,000 IY 09/77/2008 8.22 AM 5-10 DRAFT _.. (4,,, it ( CITY OF RENTON PLANNING/BUILDING/PUBLIC WORKS TRANSPORTATION SYSTEMS DIVISION 2007-2012 SIX-YEAR TIP Rainier Avenue -SW 7th St to S 4th PI Functional Classification: Principal Arterial Fund: 317 Proj.Length: 0.3 miles Proj: 12308 Type: 1 -INFRASTRUCTURE RANK: 11 CONTACT: Jason Fritzler 425.430.7243 DESCRIPTION: STATUS: Improvements complete a missing link, remove barriers,eliminate sub-standard conditions,control and 30%design is complete. BNSF has approved a steel thru-plate girder bridge type. consolidate access points to existing major businesses,and provide an enhanced pedestrian Construction funding will be pushed to 2010. The TIB awarded$2,208,000 in environment. Project elements include adding a third NB through-lane,adding a left-turn lane,removing Transportation Partnership Program(TPP)grant funds in November 2003. $300,000 of the BNSF railroad bridge support pier,lowering the roadway to provide standard clearance under the mitigation funds must be dedicated to this project to fulfill the grant requirements. bridge,and widening sidewalks to 10 feet with streetscaping. JUSTIFICATION: CHANGES: Existing high level of traffic congestion and accidents. Bottleneck including reduction of lanes from three Due to the high volume of traffic on the Rainier Corridor,construction of both railroad to two at S 7th St and the BNSF bridge and support pier just south of S 4th PI. The improvements will bridges(Hardie and Rainier)will occur simultaneously(2007-2008),and Hardie will be enhance traffic flow and reduce accidents. They will provide a missing link on Rainier Ave.with one widened to accommodate detour traffic on Rainier. This will put construction of Rainier into additional northbound(NB)lane. 2009-2010. The 30%design cost estimate is reflected in the programmed funds below. The total project cost has increased approximately$2.4 million. l_ Funded :l 7 231,819L Unfunded:1 2,057,836 Project Totals Programmed Pre-2007 Six Year Program ITEM Programmed Spent Pre-2006 _ 2006 Total 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 EXPENSES: Project Development Precon Eng/Admin 1,139,655 289,655 721,000 129,000 129,000 R-O-W(includes Admin) 500,000 150,000 350,000 350,000 Construction Contract Fee 6,500,000 6,500,000 1,500,000 1,500,000- 1,750,000 1,750,000 Construction Enq/Admin 650,000 650,000 150,000 150,000 175,000 175,000 Other-BNSF work 500,000 500,000 500_000 TOTAL EXPENSES 9,289,655 289,655 871,000 8,129,000 2,629,000 1,650c000� 1,925,000 1,925,000 SOURCES OF FUNDS: Vehicle Fuel Tax 365,000 365,000 100,000 245,000 20,000 Business License Fee 949,900 149,900 800,000 20,000 680,000 100,000 Proposed Fund Balance 3182,719 181,437, 409,600 2,591,682 , 2,279,000 312 682 Grants In-Hand 2,208,000 3,51 90,000 2,114,482 150,000 1,000,000, 964,482 Mitigation In-Hand 526,200 104,700_ 221,500 200,000 , 100_000 100,000_ a Bonds/L.I.D.'s Formed Other In-Hand - , Grants Proposed Mitigation Proposed L.I.D's Proposed _ Other Proposed Undetermined 2,057,836 2,057,836 1,217,318 840,518 TOTAL SOURCES 9,289,655 289,655 871,000 8,129,000 2,629,000 1,650,000 1,925,000_ 1,925,000 Rainier-RR 8rtly 0]/2]17008 8.71 AM 5-11 DRAFT CITY OF RENTON PLANNING/BUILDING/PUBLIC WORKS TRANSPORTATION SYSTEMS DIVISION 2007-2012 SIX-YEAR TIP Ripley Lane North Functional Classification: N/A Fund: 317 Proj.Length: N/A Proj: 12602 Type: 4-ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT RANK: 12 CONTACT: John Hasty 425.430.7246 DESCRIPTION: STATUS: The project will make improvements on Ripley Lane North from Lake Washington Blvd.N.to the street end to support future redevelopment plans. The project will pave four feet of shoulder on the west side of Ripley Lane N.from Lake Washington Blvd. N.to the first residence,install pavement markings to deliniate non-motorized traffic, re-stripe roadway,landscape,and potentially install chain link fence. JUSTIFICATION: CHANGES: New project to support development plans. I Funded :I 500,0001 Unfunded:I Project Totals Programmed Pre-2007 Six-Year Program ITEM Programmed Spent Pre-2006 2006 Total 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 EXPENSES: Project Development 10,000 10,000 10,000 Precon Eng/Admin 57,000 57,000 57,000 R-O-W(includes Admini Construction Contract Fee 380,000 380,000 380,000 Construction Eng/Admin 38,000 38,000 38,000 Other 15,000 15,000 15,000 TOTAL EXPENSES 500,000 500,000 500,000 SOURCES OF FUNDS: Vehicle Fuel Tax Business License Fee Proposed Fund Balance Grants In-Hand Mitigation In-Hand 500,000 500,000 500,000 Bonds*/L.I.D.'s Formed Other In-Hand(GF) Grants Proposed Mitigation Proposed L.I.D.'s Proposed Other Proposed Undetermined TOTAL SOURCES 500,000 500,000 500,000 07/27/2006 6.22 AM RIpN7 M 5-12 DRAFT ( ( CITY OF RENTON . PLANNING/BUILDING/PUBLIC WORKS TRANSPORTATION SYSTEMS DIVISION 2007-2012 SIX-YEAR TIP South Lake Washington Roadway Improvements - Districts 1 &2 Functional Classification: N/A Fund: 317 Proj.Length: N/A Proj: 12306 Type: 4-ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT RANK: 13 CONTACT: Rob Lochmiller 425.430.7303 DESCRIPTION: STATUS: The project will construct the needed roadway improvements in the South Lake Washington area to City Council allocated$1.5 million from the General Fund in 2004. 30%consultant contract support future redevelopment plans. New roads and intersections will be built and existing roadways will awarded in 2004 for roadway improvements needed to support District 1. Final design of be widened/extended to provide adequate future traffic flows. Redevelopment is phased into 2 districts, District 1 was awarded in 2005 for$927,330. Transportation funds expended from Fund each having their own needed roadway improvements. Roadways included in the project are Logan, Park, 317 will be reimbursed. The project will move to Fund 318 once the bond funds are and Garden Avenues,and 6th,8th,and 10th Streets. received. JUSTIFICATION: CHANGES: Key project for the redevelopment of Boeing's north Renton site. The partnership between the City and *The City is in the process of applying for bonds. Costs reflect roadway improvements Boeing aspires to draw private interest in an area to be redeveloped from the aerospace company's use to including stormwater,sanitary sewer and water improvements. Grant awards:$5 million of commercial/retail use. A tight deadline has been outlined in the agreement that entails the needed CTED funds for utilities;new EDA grant($2,054,314)now supplants equal amount of bond roadway improvements and the new stormwater,sewer,and water utilities required to accomodate the needs. Funds for District 2 improvements($11.7 million estimate)have been removed from shift in land use. the programmed funds below. The schedule of further sales of Boeing property is currently unknown. I Funded :I 25,191,4141 Unfunded :1 Project Totals Programmed Pre-2007 Six-Year Program _ ITEM Programmed Spent Pre-2006 , 2006 Total 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 EXPENSES: Project Development Precon Eng/Admin 2,875,000 1 962,714 912,286 R-O-W(includes Admin) _ Construction Contract Fee 18,477,614 9,062,714 9,414,900 9A14,900 Construction Eng/Admin 1,781,000 900,000 881 000 881,000 Other 2,057,800 2,057,800 2,057,800 TOTAL EXPENSES 25,191,414 1,962,714' 10,875,000 12,353,700 12,353,700 SOURCES OF FUNDS: . Vehicle Fuel Tax _ Business License Fee Proposed Fund Balance Grants In-Hand-CTED&EDA _ 7_,054,314 5,000,000 2,054,314 2,054,314 Mitigation In-Hand _ Bonds*/L.I.D's Formed 15,799,000 462,714 5,875,000 9,461,286 9,461,286 Other In-Hand-Gen Fnd&H.P. 2,338,100 1,500,000 838,100 838,100_ Grants Proposed _ _ Mitigation Proposed , L.I.D's Proposed Other Proposed Undetermined _ TOTAL SOURCES 25,191,414 1,962,714 10,875,000 12,353,700 12,353,700 _ _ 9 W.WA�mpm'. O7/'2'7/2009 9.72 AM 5-13 DRAFT CITY OF RENTON PLANNING/BUILDING/PUBLIC WORKS TRANSPORTATION SYSTEMS DIVISION 2007 -2012 SIX-YEAR TIP Garden Ave. N. Widening Functional Classification: Minor Arterial Fund: 317 Proj.Length: 0.38 miles Proj: 12803 Type: 4-ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT RANK: 14 CONTACT: Rob Lochmiller 425.430.7303 DESCRIPTION: STATUS: The project will design and construct the needed roadway improvements,including road widening,to accomodate additional traffic from future redevelopment plans in the area. The project area is from N 8th St.to Park Ave. N. JUSTIFICATION: CHANGES: The South Lake Washington developer-oriented project is expected to generate additional traffic on New project. Garden Ave. N. 1 Funded :1 1,000,0001 Unfunded :1 Project Totals Programmed Pre-2007 Six-Year Program ITEM Programmed Spent Pre-2006 2006 Total 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 EXPENSES: Project Development Precon Eng/Admin 100,000 100,000 100,000 R-O-W(includes Admin) Construction Contract Fee 810,000 810,000 810,000 Construction Eng/Admin 90,000 90,000 90,000 Other TOTAL EXPENSES 1,000,000 1,000,000 1,000,000 SOURCES OF FUNDS: Vehicle Fuel Tax Business License Fee Proposed Fund Balance Grants In-Hand Mitigation In-Hand 1,000,000 1,000,000 1,000,000 Bonds*/L.I.D.'s Formed Other In-Hand(GF) Grants Proposed Mitigation Proposed L.I.D.'s Proposed Other Proposed Undetermined TOTAL SOURCES 1,000,000 1,000,000 1,000,000 $L.k.WA Improv 07/27/2066 8 22 AM 5-14 DRAFT t CITY OF RENTON PLANNING/BUILDING/PUBLIC WORKS TRANSPORTATION SYSTEMS DIVISION 2007 -2012 SIX YEAR TIP South Renton Burnett Park Neighborhood Street Improvements Functional Classification: N/A Fund: 317 Proj.Length: N/A Proj: 12194 Type: 1 -INFRASTRUCTURE RANK: 15 CONTACT: Ryan Plut 425.430.7372 DESCRIPTION: STATUS: Provide improvements and asphalt overlay in the South Renton Burnett Park Neighborhood to include Traffic improvements in the South Renton Burnett Park Neighborhood completed. King the S Bumett Av/S 4th intersection. Asphalt overlay Shattuck Av S from SW 7th St to Houser Wy S, County Metro mitigation funds of$175,000 were assigned to as follows: $40,000 for South 6th St from Burnett Av S to Shattuck Av S,SW 7th St from Shattuck Av S to Rainier Av S, design of improvements for Burnett/S 4th intersection;$60,000 reserved for Burnett/S 4th South 5th St from Burnett Av S to Smithers Av S. intersection construction with Council concur; $75,000 for South Renton street overlay projects. Remaining overlay streets added to the 2007 overlay project list. JUSTIFICATION: CHANGES: Deteriorating streets. New 2006 projects provide sidewalks and access to Burnett Linear Park. Construction of 4th&Burnett improvements complete. Construction of sidewalk in Burnett Linear Park complete. Need Council approval of$60,000 remaining Metro mitigation funds and transfer of reserve funds from South Renton Reserves for completed work. New projects: 5th&Burnett,6th&Burnett,and mid-block between 5th and 6th pending reserve fund availability. 'Funded: 1722,580 {Unfunded: ' Project Totals Programmed Pre-2007 Six-Year Program ITEM Programmed Spent Pre-2006 2006 Total 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 EXPENSES: Project Development 973 973 Precon Eng/Admin 99,112 51,112 48,000 R-O-W(includes Admin) Construction Contract Fee 480,495 200,495 280,000 Construction Eng/Admin 31,700 31,700 _ Other-Burrett Park&Overlay 110,300 35,300 75,000 75,000_ TOTAL EXPENSES 722,580 252,580 395,000 75,000 75,000 SOURCE OF FUNDS: Vehicle Fuel Tax Business License Fee Prop. Fund Bal. 422,580 87,580 335,000 . Grants In-Hand Mitigation In-Hand 125,000 125,000 Bonds/L.I.D.'s Formed _ Other In-Hand-Metro Mitig. 175,000 40,000 60,000 75,000 75,000 Grants Proposed . Mitigation Proposed _ _ L.I.D.'s Proposed Other Proposed Undetermined _ TOTAL SOURCES 722,580' 252,580 395,000 75,000 75,000 S Renton ProMtt 07/27/2006 6:72 AM 5-15 DRAFT CITY OF RENTON PLANNING/BUILDING/PUBLIC WORKS TRANSPORTATION SYSTEMS DIVISION 2007-2012 SIX-YEAR TIP 1-405 Improvements in Renton Functional Classification: N/A Fund: 317 Proj.Length: N/A Proj: 12210 Type: 4-ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT RANK: 16 CONTACT: Keith Woolley 425.430.7318 DESCRIPTION: STATUS: Conceptual planning process to evaluate performance of existing and future freeway and interchange WSDOT construction of the South Renton Nickel project is scheduled to begin in late 2007 facilities along 1-405. Construction impacts to local streets will also be evaluated. with a total project budget of$136 million. The Transportation Partnership Act(TPA)9.5 cent gas tax increase passed by the Washington State Legislature in May 2005 has a budget of$180 million for South Renton. TPA also budgeted funds for 1-405 improvements north of the N 44th St.interchange. JUSTIFICATION: CHANGES: The intent of this planning study is to coordinate proposed improvements to 1-405 by WSDOT with the City The program budgets for 2007 through 2009 were increased and the program was interests. Programmed funds will be utilized for staff time and potential consultant cost. extended one more year to 2012. I Funded :1 218,3851 Unfunded :1 Project Totals Programmed Pre-2007 Six-Year Program ITEM Programmed Spent Pre-2006 2006 Total _ 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 EXPENSES: Project Development 218,385 68,385 30,000 120,000 30,000 30,000 30,000 10,000 10,000 10,000 Precon Enq/Admin R-O-W(includes Admin) Construction Contract Fee _ Construction Enq/Admin _ Other TOTAL EXPENSES 218,385 68,385 30,000 120,000 30,000 30,000 30,000 10,000 10,000 10,000 SOURCE OF FUNDS: _ Vehicle Fuel Tax Business License Fee 158,385 68,385 30,000 60,000 _ 20,000 10,000 10,000 10,000 10,000 Proposed Fund Balance - 'Grants In-Hand - Mitigation In-Hand 60,000 60,000 30,000 10,000 20,000 . Bonds/L.I.D.'s Formed Other In-Hand _ Grants Proposed Mitigation Proposed _ L.I.D.'s Proposed Other Proposed _ Undetermined TOTAL SOURCES 218,385 68,385 30,000 120,000 30,000 30,000 30,000 10,000 10,000 10,000 ' Inm 07/27/2008 822 AM 5-16 DRAFT ` ( ( ( CITY OF RENTON PLANNING/BUILDING/PUBLIC WORKS TRANSPORTATION SYSTEMS DIVISION 2007 -2012 SIX-YEAR TIP Project Development& Pre-Design Program Functional Classification: N/A Fund: 317 Proj.Length: N/A Proj: 12150 Type: 2-MULTI-MODAL/TDM RANK: 17 CONTACT: Sharon Griffin 425.430.7232 DESCRIPTION: STATUS: Perform critical activities needed for the development of future CIP projects and for grant Ongoing yearly program. This program began including more staff time reimbursement in applications,including scoping,cost estimates,pre-design,interlocal agreements and 2004. deficiency analysis. Also provides for the monitoring of active grant projects for compliance with State and Federal laws, regulations and specifications. JUSTIFICATION: CHANGES: Analysis of existing and projected transportation operation problems, infrastructure maintenance In 2006,this program began including more small studies funding and funds required to needs,local and regional mobility goals and revenues/costs is vital to the development of match new grants. $15,000 moved in 2006 to the 3rd/Shattuck intersection project to start transportation projects that will be buildable,financable,best serve the needs of Renton and design(new grant). compete well for grants. Also to maintain eligibility for grant funding,the City must assure that project specifications and management comply with current State and Federal standards. [Funded : 11,522,592 'Unfunded : 175,000 Project Totals Programmed Pre-2007Six-Year Program ITEM Programmed Spent In 2005 2006 Total 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 EXPENSES: Project Development 1,089_572 99,572 130,000 860,000 130,000 130,000= 150,000 150,000 150,000 150,000 Precon Eng/Admin 508,020 13,020 80000 415,000 95,000 95000 75,000 50,000, 50,000 50,000 R-O-W(includes Admin) _ Construction Contract Fee _ Construction Eng/Admin Other _ TOTAL EXPENSES 1,597,592 112,592 210,000 1,275,000 225,000 225,000 225,000 200,000 200,000 200,000 SOURCE OF FUNDS: _ Vehicle Fuel Tax Business License Fee 1,362,592 112,592 175,000 1,075,000 175,000 175,000 200,000 175,000 175,000 175,000 Proposed Fund Balance 160,000 35,000 125,000 50,000 50,000 25,000 Grants In-Hand , Mitigation In-Hand Bonds/L.I.D.'s Formed Other In-Hand Grants Proposed _ , Mitigation Proposed _ L.I.D.'s Proposed Other Proposed Undetermined 75,000 75,000 25,000 25,000 25,000 TOTAL SOURCES' 1,597,592 112,592_ 210,000 1,275,000 225,000 225,000 225,000_ 200,000 200,000 200,000 0727/2008 8:22 AM Pn_o 5-17 DRAFT • CITY OF RENTON PLANNING/BUILDING/PUBLIC WORKS TRANSPORTATION SYSTEMS DIVISION 2007-2012 SIX-YEAR TIP NE 4th Street/Hoquiam Avenue NE Functional Classification: N/A Fund: 317 Proj.Length: N/A Proj: 12209 Type: 5-OPERATIONS AND SAFETY RANK: 18 CONTACT: Leslie Lahndt 425.430.7223 DESCRIPTION: STATUS: Install new fully actuated traffic signal,including poles,signal and pedestrian displays,detection Design should be completed in Summer 2006. loops,emergency pre-emption,a new signal controller, interconnect to master computer and associated channelization. Right-of-way needs are unknown at this time. JUSTIFICATION: CHANGES: Increasing vehicular and pedestrian traffic in this area is warranting a traffic signal based on Construction should proceed in Summer/Fall 2006. safety and delays. I Funded:1 400,0001 Unfunded :1 Project Totals Programmed Pre-2007 Six-Year Program ITEM Programmed Spent Pre-2006 2006 Total 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 EXPENSES: Project Development Precon Eng/Admin 51,400 31,400 20,000 R-O-W(includes Admin) 20,000 20,000 Construction Contract Fee 300,600 300,600 Construction Eng/Admin 28,000 18,400 9,600 9,600 Other TOTAL EXPENSES 400,000 31,400 359,000 9,600 9,600 SOURCE OF FUNDS: Vehicle Fuel Tax _ Business License Fee 10,000 400 9,600 Proposed Fund Balance Grants In-Hand Mitigation In-Hand 390,000 31,000 349,400 9,600 9,600 Bonds/L.I.D.'s Formed Other In-Hand Grants Proposed Mitigation Proposed L.I.D's Proposed Other Proposed Undetermined TOTAL SOURCES 400,000 31,400 359,000 9,600 9,600 NE Ith SN/oqui.m Av 0]/37/2008 a 32 AM 5-18 DRAFT • CITY OF RENTON PLANNING/BUILDING/PUBLIC WORKS TRANSPORTATION SYSTEMS DIVISION 2007-2012 SIX-YEAR TIP Arterial Circulation Program Functional Classification: N/A Fund: 317 Proj.Length: N/A Proj: 29 Type: 2-MULTI-MODAL/TDM RANK: 19 CONTACT: Keith Woolley 425.430.7318 DESCRIPTION: STATUS: This program provides for the long-range and short range planning and traffic analysis required This project will fund the on-going planning work which will lead to refinement to evaluate and update the Transportation Plan in relation to the Comprehensive Land Use Plan, and/or adjustment of the of improvement projects on the arterial network identified to assess the impacts of new development proposals and to recommend local and regional in the Transportation Plan. transportation system improvements for all modes of travel. Funding for hardware,software and employee hours required to operate the computer model is also included under this program. JUSTIFICATION: CHANGES: Combined State and Federal Clean Air legislation,the Growth Management Act,passage of the $15,000 moved in 2006 to 3rd/Shattuck intersection project to start design(new grant). RTA plan and the increasing importance of making sure that local and regional transportation plans are coordinated to the benefit of Renton,make on-going,multi-modal planning a high priority need. (Funded : 11,385,680 (Unfunded: 1175,000 Project Totals Programmed Pre-2007 Six-Year Program ITEM , Programmed Spent In 2005 2006 Total 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 EXPENSES: Project Development 1,560,680, 75,680+_ 185,000 1,300,000 200,000 200,000 200,000 200,000, 250,000 250,000 Precon Enq/Admin , R-O-W(includes Admini _ Construction Contract Fee Construction Eng/Admin Other _ _ TOTAL EXPENSES 1,560,680 75,680 185,000 1,300,000 200,000 200,000 200,000 200,000 250,000 250,000 SOURCE 0 FUNDS: Vehicle Fuel Tax Business License Fee 1,385,680, 75,680 185_,000 1,125,000 200000 200000 200,000. 175,000 175,000 175,000 r Proposed Fund Balance _ _ Grants In-Hand Mitigation In-Hand L.I.D.'s Formed Other In-Hand _ Grants Proposed _ Mitigation Proposed _ L.I.D.'s Proposed _ Other Proposed _ Undetermined 175,000 175,000 \ 25,000 75,000 75,000 TOTAL SOURCES 1,560,680_ 75,680_ 185,000 1,300,000 200,000_ 200,000 200,000 200,000 250,000 250,000 Ck 07(2712008 8:22 AM 5-19 DRAFT CITY OF RENTON PLANNING/BUILDING/PUBLIC WORKS TRANSPORTATION SYSTEMS DIVISION 2007-2012 SIX-YEAR TIP Bridge Inspection & Repair Program Functional Classification: N/A Fund: 317 Proj.Length: N/A Proj: 106 Type: 1 -INFRASTRUCTURE RANK: 20 CONTACT: Jason Fritzler 425.430.7243 DESCRIPTION: STATUS: Inspect all roadway bridges owned by the City every two years to determine bridge sufficiency Biennial bridge inspections occur in 2007,2009 and 2011. The Houser Way Bridge will be and load ratings,seismic retrofit needs, undertake minor repairs,and preventative maintenance painted in 2006. The Monster Road Bridge repairs require an annual inspection frequency as needed. for the next three inspection cycles, resulting in higher annual expenditures. JUSTIFICATION: CHANGES: Inspection program must be done for safety and funding purposes and as part of WSBIS The City's bridges and culverts will be inspected in 2006. Outdated scour and load rating Program to determine structural deficiencies, physical deterioration,or functional obsolescence for each of the bridges will be evaluated in 2007 and 2008, requiring additional funds. and to qualify for Federal bridge replacement grant funding. Repair funding is provided to accomplish improvements, identified through the inspection program,that will increase the safety and extend the longevity of the structures. (Funded : 1619,581 (Unfunded : (35,000 Project Totals Programmed Pre-2007 Six-Year Program ITEM Programmed Spent in 2005 2006 Total 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 EXPENSES: Project Development 3,424 3,424 Precon Eng/Admin 151,157 41,157 30,000 80,000 30,000 10,000 10,000 10,000 10,000 10,000 R-O-W(includes Admin) Construction Contract Fee 150,000 150,000 Construction Eng/Admin 10,000 10,000 Other 340,000 30,000 310,000 75,000 65,000 45,000' 40,000 45,000 40,000 TOTAL EXPENSES 654,581 44,581 220,000 390,000 105,000 75,000 55,000 50,000 55,000 50,000 SOURCE OF FUNDS: Vehicle Fuel Tax Business License Fee 420,000 40,000 140,000 240,000 40,000 40000 40,000 40,000 40,000 40,000 Proposed Fund Balance 199,581 4,581 80,000 115,000 65,000 35,000 15,000 Grants In-Hand Mitigation In-Hand Bonds/L.I.D.'s Formed Other In-Hand _ Grants Proposed Mitigation Proposed . L.I.D.'s Proposed . Other Proposed Undetermined 35,000 35,000 10,000 15,000 10,000 TOTAL SOURCES 654,581 44,581 220,000 390,000 105,000 75,000 55,000 50,000 55,000 50,000 - e iro.p.a 07/27/2C0(107/27/2C0(1a rt An+ 5-20 DRAFT ( (i,,, I( ( CITY OF RENTON PLANNING/BUILDING/PUBLIC WORKS TRANSPORTATION SYSTEMS DIVISION 2007-2012 SIX-YEAR TIP May Creek Bridge Replacement Functional Classification: N/A Fund: 317 Proj.Length: N/A Proj: 12503 Type: 1 -INFRASTRUCTURE RANK: 21 CONTACT: Jason Fntzler 425.430.7243 DESCRIPTION: STATUS: Completely reomve the existing bridge structure and the timber piers within the waterway. Replace with a The May Creek Bridge was inspected in 2005. The findings were not used to apply for single span,concrete structure supported on concrete abutments. Adjust the alignments of both BRAC funding due to changes at WSDOT(see below). approaches to conform to the increase in bridge deck height. This replacement will require some right-of- way acquisition due to the adjustment of the alignment and the new bridge location. JUSTIFICATION: CHANGES: The existing structure is four feet below the 100-year flood water level standards set by WSDOT. The In 2005,WSDOT notified local agencies that they would not be accepting bridge bridge deck is supported by a timber pier that is vulnerable to the weakening effect of rot and damage replacement grant applications until at least 2007. With the uncertainty of funding from debris flows. Failure of this pier would cause immediate collapse. The timber abutments are availability,and the condition of the structure(structurally deficient),the City is proceeding showing evidence of rot and deterioration. forward with the bridge replacement without federal funds in-hand. We will request advance construction approval. 1 Funded :1 186,0001_ Unfunded:1 649,000 Project Totals Programmed Pre-2007 Six Year Program ITEM Programmed Spent Pre-2006 2006 Total _ 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 EXPENSES: Project Development ' Precon Eng/Admin 186,000 120,000 66,000 66,000 R-O-W(includes Admin) Construction Contract Fee 586,000 586,000 ` 440,000 146,000 Construction Eng/Admin 63,000. 63,000 44,000 14,000 5,000 Other TOTAL EXPENSES 835,000 120,000 715,000 550,000 160,000 5,000 SOURCES OF FUNDS: Vehicle Fuel Tax Business License Fee 70,000 70,000 , Proposed Fund Balance 116,000 50,000 66,000 66,000 Grants In-Hand Mitigation In-Hand _ Bonds/L.I.D.'s Formed Other In-Hand Grants Proposed-BRAC AC 649,000_ 649,000 484,000 160,000 5,000, , Mitigation Proposed , L.I.D.'s Proposed Other Proposed Undetermined TOTAL SOURCES 835,000 120,000 715,000 550,000 160,000 5,000 07/27/2C08 6:22 nM May Creek 5-21 DRAFT CITY OF RENTON PLANNING/BUILDING/PUBLIC WORKS TRANSPORTATION SYSTEMS DIVISION 2007-2012 SIX-YEAR TIP Traffic Signal Loop Replacement Program Functional Classification: N/A Fund: 317 Proj.Length: N/A Proj: 16 Type: 1 -INFRASTRUCTURE RANK: 22 CONTACT: Dave Whitmarsh 425.430.7423 DESCRIPTION: STATUS: Replace failed or failing traffic signal vehicle detection loops and repair pavement as required to achieve On-going yearly program. proper installation and assure reliability. JUSTIFICATION: CHANGES: Most of Renton's signals require extensive vehicle detection systems to provide traffic count data needed for the intersection controllers and VMS signal coordination system to operate effectively. The detection loops in the pavement must be properly maintained;their failure results in highly inefficient operation. Pavement deterioriation due to heavy traffic volumes,trucks,and adverse weather have increased the need for replacement. )Funded : 1130,105 !Unfunded: 115,000 Project Totals Programmed Pre-2007 Six-Year Program ITEM Programmed Spent In 2005 2006 Total 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 EXPENSES: Project Development Precon Enq/Admin , R-O-W(includes Admin) Construction Contract Fee 124,105 25,105 12,000 87,000 12,000 12,000 12,000 17,000 17,000, 17,000 Construction Eng/Admin 3,500 500 3,000 500 500 500 500 500 500 Other(City Force) 17,500 2,500 15,000 2,500 2,500 2,500 2,500 2,500 2,500 TOTAL EXPENSES 145,105 25,105 15,000 105,000 15,000 15,000 15,000 20,000 20,000 20,000 SOURCE OF FUNDS: Vehicle Fuel Tax Business License Fee 130,105 25,105 15,000 90,000 15,000 15,000 15,000 15,000 15,000 15,000 Proposed Fund Balance Grants In-Hand Mitigation In-Hand Bonds/L.I.D.'s Formed Other In-Hand . Grants Proposed Mitigation Proposed L.I.D.'s Proposed Other Proposed Undetermined 15,000 15,000 5,000 5,000 5,000 TOTAL SOURCES 145,105 25,105 15,000 105,000 15,000 15,000 15,000_ 20,000 20,000 20,000 07.0. 6. 5-22 DRAFT .. ( k CITY OF RENTON PLANNING/BUILDING/PUBLIC WORKS TRANSPORTATION SYSTEMS DIVISION 2007 -2012 SIX-YEAR TIP Traffic Sign Replacement Program Functional Classification: N/A Fund: 317 Proj.Length: N/A Proj: 12113 Type: 1 -INFRASTRUCTURE RANK: 23 CONTACT: Dave Whitmarsh 425.430.7423 DESCRIPTION: STATUS: This program provides for the replacement and/or relocation of signs that are obsolete,faded, On-going yearly program.Contract fee amount is for purchase of materials that poorly located or no longer appropriate. will be assembled and installed by City. JUSTIFICATION: CHANGES: Poor signing can create safety problems and driver confusion. Purchase of these materials falls beyond normal maintenance budget. !Funded : 141,255 LUnfunded: 17,500 , Project Totals Programmed Pre-2007 Six-Year Program ITEM Programmed Spent in 2005 2006 Total 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 EXPENSES: Project Development _ _ Precon Eng/Admin , R-O-W Includes Admin) Construction Contract Fee 35,255 6,255 3,500 25,500 3,500 3,500 3,500 5,000 5 000 5,000 Construction Eng/Admin _ Other(City Forces) 13,500 1,500 12,000 1,500 1,500 1,500 2,500 2,500 2,500 TOTAL EXPENSES 48,755 6,255 5,000 37,500 5,000 5,000 5,000 7,500 7,500 7,500 SOURCE OF FUNDS: Vehicle Fuel Tax Business License Fee 41,255 6,255 5,000 30,000 5,000 5,000 5,000 5,000 5,000 5,000 Proposed Fund Balance Grants In-Hand Mitigation In-Hand Bonds/L.I.D.'s Formed Other In-Hand _ Grants Proposed _ Mitigation Proposed _ L.I.D.'s Proposed _ Other Proposed _ Undetermined 7,500 _ 7,500 2,500 2,500 2,500 TOTAL SOURCES 48,755 6,255 5,000 37,500 5,000 5,000 5,000 7,500 7,500 7,500 840. 07/2712006 9:22 AM 5-23 DRAFT CITY OF RENTON PLANNING/BUILDING/PUBLIC WORKS TRANSPORTATION SYSTEMS DIVISION 2007-2012 SIX-YEAR TIP Pole Replacement Program Functional Classification: N/A Fund: 317 Proj.Length: N/A Proj: 91 Type: 1 -INFRASTRUCTURE RANK: 24 CONTACT: Dave Whitmarsh 425.430.7423 DESCRIPTION: STATUS: This program is for the replacement of damaged luminaire and signal poles.These poles have On-going yearly program.Contract fee amount is for purchase and repair of poles. been damaged in unknown incidents where reimbursement through normal channels is impossible. JUSTIFICATION: CHANGES: Pedestrian and vehicular safety is highly related to adequate signal displays and street lighting. Purchase of these poles falls beyond normal maintenance budget. Changing out a single pole costs$10,000 to $14,000. Damaged and rusting poles that loose galvanization degrade to the point of threatening their structural integrity. 'Funded : 1157,954 (Unfunded : 115,000 Project Totals Programmed Pre-2007 Six-Year Program _ ITEM Programmed Spent In 2005 2006 Total 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 EXPENSES: Project Development Precon Eng/Admin 4,500 4,500 1,500 1,500 1,500 R-O-W(includes Admin) Construction Contract Fee 160,954 17,954 20,000 123,000 20,000 20,000 20,000 21,000 21,000 21,000 Construction Eng/Admin Other 7,500 7,500 2,500 2,500 2,500 TOTAL EXPENSES 172,954 17,954 20,000 135,000 20,000 20,000, 20,000 25,000 25,000 25,000 SOURCE OF FUNDS: Vehicle Fuel Tax Business License Fee 157,954 17,954 20,000 120,000 20,000 20,000 20,000 20,000 20,000 20,000 Proposed Fund Balance Grants In-Hand Mitigation In-Hand Bonds/L.I.D.'s Formed Other In-Hand Grants Proposed Mitigation Proposed - L.I.D.'s Proposed . Other Proposed Undetermined 15,000 15,000 5,000 5,000 5,000 TOTAL SOURCES 172,954 17,954 20,000 135,000 20,000_ 20,000 20,000 25,000 25,000 25,000, Pala 07/21/2C06 6'Z2AM 5-24 DRAFT - . ( ( ( CITY OF RENTON PLANNING/BUILDING/PUBLIC WORKS TRANSPORTATION SYSTEMS DIVISION 2007-2012 SIX-YEAR TIP Sound Transit HOV Direct Access Functional Classification: Freeway Fund: 317 Proj.Length: N/A Proj: 12171 Type: 2-MULTI-MODAL/TDM RANK: Y5 CONTACT: Keith Woolley 425.430.7318 DESCRIPTION: STATUS: This program provides for coordination with and input into WSDOT and Sount Transit plan Funds are identified for coordination critical to ensuring Sound Transit(ST) for the HOV Direct Access interchange and South Renton transit improvements. improvements are consistent with City needs and desires. JUSTIFICATION: CHANGES: Direct access to 1-405 HOV lanes is an important element in increasing transit speed and Potential Regional package in 2007 includes funding for the 1-405 Renton to Bellevue which ridership in Renton. would allow the N 8th direct access ramps to be constructed. Funding in 2009 through 2011 anticipates coordination. 'Funded : 175,910 (Unfunded : 18,000 Project Totals Programmed Pre-2007 Six-Year Program ITEM Programmed Spent Pre-2006 2006 Total 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 J EXPENSES: . Project Development _ 83,910 66,910 5,000 12,000 4,000 4,000 4,900 Precon Eng/Admin R-O-W(includes Admin) , Construction Contract Fee Construction Eng/Admin _ ' Other TOTAL EXPENSES 83,910 66,910 5,000 12,000 4,000 4,000 4,000 SOURCE OF FUNDS: Vehicle Fuel Tax Business License Fee 67,967 58,967 5,000 4,000 4,000 Proposed Fund Balance _ 7,943 7943 _ _ Grants In-Hand _ Mitigation In-Hand Bonds/L.I.D.'s Formed Other In-Hand Grants Proposed Mitigation Proposed _ L.I.D.'s Proposed Other Proposed , Undetermined 8,000 8,000 , 4,000_ 4,000 TOTAL SOURCES 83,910, 66,910,_ 5,000 12,000 _ 4,000 4,000 4,000 ST MOV 07/27/2008 8:22 AM 5-25 DRAFT CITY OF RENTON PLANNING/BUILDING/PUBLIC WORKS TRANSPORTATION SYSTEMS DIVISION 2007-2012 SIX-YEAR TIP Miscellaneous Traffic Safety Program Functional Classification: N/A Fund: 317 Proj.Length: N/A Proj: 12115 Type: 5-OPERATIONS AND SAFETY RANK: 26 CONTACT: Karl Hamilton 425.430.7220 DESCRIPTION: STATUS: This ongoing yearly program provides for special small-scale traffic safety improvements Uninterruptable power supply(UPS)at one intersection has been completed. Program goal that are identified and require materials, labor or equipment beyond the normal scope of City is to install UPS at two critical intersections per year(all years),pending sufficient funding. operations and maintenance crews. LED Replacement Program moved to Traffic Efficiency Program. The lead agency status for new grant(see"Changes"below)is being transferred to WSDOT for an upcoming project. JUSTIFICATION: CHANGES: Historically,this level of traffic safety improvements are required on an annual basis. This FHWA Intersection&Corridor Safety grant of$90,000 was awarded in 2006 for a WSDOT program budgets for safety projects to address these needs. Projects are typically identified "High Collision Location"at Park Drive at 1-405 Northbound Ramps(45 accidents in three through citizen concerns,analysis of accident records or observation by City Traffic Operations years). Funding of$87,000 for a Parks Department project,"Heather Downs"roadway and Maintenance personnel. Traffic Operations Section identify and prioritize locations. improvements,was added in 2006. Construction completed in 2006. Funding added in 2007 for red light photo enforcement,partnering with the Police Department program. (Funded: 1271334 (Unfunded : 160,000 Project Totals Programmed Pre-2007 Six-Year Program ITEM Programmed Spent In 2005 2006 Total 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 EXPENSES: Project Development Precon Enq/Admin 30,000 9,000 21,000 2,500 2,500 2,500 4,500 4,500 4,500 R-O-W(includes Admin) Construction Contract Fee 223,500 78,000 145,50016,000 16,000 16,000 32,500 32,500 32,500 Construction Eng/Admin 13,500, 13,500 J 1,500 1,500 1,500 3,000 3,000 3,000 Other 64,73 39,734 20,000 5,000 5,000 TOTAL EXPENSES 331,734 39,734 107,000 185,000 25,000 20,000 20,000 40,000 40,000 40,000 SOURCE OF FUNDS: Vehicle Fuel Tax 20,000 20,000 20,000 Business License Fee 159,734 39,734 20,000 100,000 20,000 20,000 20,000 20,000 20,000 Proposed Fund Balance 92,000 87,000 5,000 5,000 Grants In-Hand Mitigation In-Hand Bonds/L.I.D.'s Formed Other In-Hand . Grants Proposed Mitigation Proposed L.I.D.'s Proposed , Other Proposed Undetermined 60,000 60,000 20,000 20,000 20,000 TOTAL SOURCES 331,734 39,734 107,000 185,000 25,000 20,000 20,000 40,000_ 40,000 40,000 Y 07/27/2008 8 22 AM SMM 5-26 DRAFT (., ( e t CITY OF RENTON PLANNING/BUILDING/PUBLIC WORKS TRANSPORTATION SYSTEMS DIVISION 2007-2012 SIX-YEAR TIP Traffic Systems Efficiency Improvements Program Functional Classification: N/A Fund: 317 Proj.Length: N/A Proj: 12162 Type: 5-OPERATIONS AND SAFETY RANK: 27 CONTACT: Karl Hamilton 425.430.7220 DESCRIPTION: STATUS: Provides for improvements to the operational efficiency of the existing roadway system, Upgrading of all signal controllers to new(to be compatible with the new Central System) including such items as development and implementation of signal coordination programs, continues into 2007. signing and channelization improvements,surveillance control and driver information system (SC&DI),transit signal priority, Intelligent Vehicle Highway Systems(IVHS),signal improvements such as protective/permissive phasing,and matching funds for possible grants to upgrade the Central traffic control system. JUSTIFICATION: CHANGES: Improving the capacity and efficiency of the existing roadway system is a very cost effective LED replacement program moved from Traffic Safety Program to Traffic Efficiency element of the transportation program. Program. LED Replacement Program-signal indicators at three intersections are complete. Program goal is to replace signal indicators at ten intersections per year. $15,000 moved in 2006 to the 3rd/Shattuck intersection project to start design(new grant). 'Funded: [589,924 I Unfunded : I Project Totals Programmed Pre-2007 Six-Year Program ITEM - Programmed Spent In 2005 2006 Total 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 EXPENSES: Project Development _ _ Precon Enq/Admin 35,802, 111802, 24,000 3,000 3,000 3,000 5,000 5,000 5,000 R-O-W(includes Admin) , Construction Contract Fee 75,000 75,000 10,000, 10,000 10,000 15,000 15,000 15,000 Construction Enq/Admin 31,000 4,000 27,000 _ 4,000 4,000 4,000 5,000 5,000 5,000 Other 448,122 246,622 82,500 119,000 38,000 33,000 33,000 5,000 5,000 5,000 TOTAL EXPENSES 589,924 258,424 86,500 245,000 55,000 50,000 50,000 30,000 30,000+ 30,000, SOURCE OF FUNDS: Vehicle Fuel Tax Business License Fee 583,400 251,900 86,500 245,000 , 55,000, 50,000 50,000. 30,000 30,000 30,000 Proposed Fund Balance 6,524 6,524 Grants In-Hand Mitigation In-Hand Bonds/L.I.D.'s Formed Other In-Hand Grants Proposed Mitigation Proposed _, L.I.D.'s Proposed Other Proposed Undetermined TOTAL SOURCES 589,924 258,424 86,500 245,000 55,000 50,000 50,000 30,000 30,000, 30,000 EMdwAey 07127/1008 8.71 AM 5-27 DRAFT CITY OF RENTON PLANNING/BUILDING/PUBLIC WORKS TRANSPORTATION SYSTEMS DIVISION 2007-2012 SIX-YEAR TIP CBD Bicycle and Pedestrian Connections Functional Classification: N/A Fund: 317 Proj.Length: N/A Proj: 12185 Type: 4-ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT RANK: 28 CONTACT: Dan Hasty 425.430.7246 DESCRIPTION: STATUS: This program will plan,design and construct projects which support non-motorized access to and All vertical curb and ramps that were impeding access in the CBD have been upgraded to circulation within the downtown. It focuses on connection to and between significant non-automobile allow access throughout the entire CBD transportation features such as the Cedar River Trail, Lake Washington Loop trail,South Renton Park& Ride and the Renton Transit Center. Preservation of existing bike and pedestrian features is also part of the program. JUSTIFICATION: CHANGES: Providing non-motorized circulation and connections between downtown transportation elements is This program will concentrate on restoration of existing facilities. challenging due to existing development. The City is committed to enhancing non-motorized access and circulation within the entire downtown,as well as making connections to transportation features outside the downtown area. [Funded : 1296,544 (Unfunded: 1135,000 Project Totals Programmed Pre-2007 Six-Year Program ITEM Programmed Spent in 2005 2006 Total 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 EXPENSES: Project Development 36,544 1,544 5,000 30,000 _ 5,000 5,000 5,000 5,000 5,000 5,000 Precon Eng/Admin 39,000 9,000 30,000 5,000 5,000 5,000 5,000 5,000 5,000 R-O-W(includes Admin) _ Construction Contract Fee 321,200 98,000 223,200 37,200 37,200 37,200 37,200 37,200 37,200 _ Construction Eng/Admin 24,800 8,000 16,800 2,800 2,800, 2,800 2,800 2,800 2,800 Other(Streetscape Study) 10,000 10,000 TOTAL EXPENSES 431,544 1,544 130,000 300,000 50,000 50,000 50,000 50,000 50,000 50,000 SOURCE OF FUNDS: _ Vehicle Fuel Tax Business License Fee 266,544 1,544 100,000 165,000 50,000 50,000 50,000 5,000 5,000 5,000 Proposed Fund Balance 30,000 30,000 Grants In-Hand Mitigation In-Hand Bonds/L.I.D.'s Formed Other In-Hand Grants Proposed Mitigation Proposed _ L.I.D.'s Proposed _ Other Proposed Undetermined 135,000 135,000 45,000 45,000 45,000 TOTAL SOURCES 431,544 1,544 130,000 300,000 , 50,000 50,000 50,000 50000 50,000 50,000 CDB_Bib_Wd 87/27!2008 8.22 AM 5-28 DRAFT (It., .. ( ( ( • CITY OF RENTON PLANNING/BUILDING/PUBLIC WORKS TRANSPORTATION SYSTEMS DIVISION 2007 -2012 SIX-YEAR TIP South 3rd Street and Shattuck Avenue Intersection Functional Classification: Principal Arterial/Collector Fund: 317 Proj.Length: N/A Proj: 12604 Type: 2-MULTI-MODAL/TDM RANK: 29 CONTACT: Bob Cavanaugh 425.430.7222 DESCRIPTION: STATUS: Design and construct the rebuilding of the intersection to improve visibility of pedestrians and bicyclists, The local agency agreement is currently being processed for state spending authority. The and provide clear direction for motorists. The improvements may include upgrading the pedestrian project will be advertised for a design contract in July/August 2006. indicators, improving the lighting for pedestrians and bicyclists,evaluating mature landscaping to optimize pedestrian visibility to motorists,and installing a new traffic signal and mast arms. JUSTIFICATION: CHANGES: The S 3rd Street and Shattuck Ave. (SR 900-MP 10.08)project was selected for a State Pedestrian& New project. A state Pedestrian and Bicycle Safety grant of$200,000 was awarded in Bicycle Safety grant of$200,000,funded through the WSDOT 2006 Supplemental Transportation Budget. 2006 to be used for non-motorized improvements. $45,000 was moved from the Traffic This location has continuously ranked high on WSDOT's"Pedestrian Accident Location"(PAL)lists. Safety Program in 2006 to start the project. (Funded : (300,000 (Unfunded : I Project Totals Programmed Pre-2007 Six-Year Program 1 ITEM Programmed Spent in 2005 2006 Total 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 EXPENSES: Project Development Precon Eng/Admin 45,000 45,000 R-O-W(includes Admin) Construction Contract Fee 127,000 127,000 127,000, Construction Eng/Admin 25,000 25,000 25,000 Other 103,000 103,000 103,000 TOTAL EXPENSES 300,000 45,000 255,000 255,000 SOURCE OF FUNDS: Vehicle Fuel Tax Business License Fee 45,000 45,000 45,000 _ Proposed Fund Balance Grants In-Hand 20Q000 45,000 155,000 155,000 Mitigation In-Hand 55,000 55,000 55,000. _ , Bonds/L.I.D.'s Formed _ Other In-Hand Grants Proposed _ Mitigation Proposed L.I.D.'s Proposed _ Other Proposed Undetermined , TOTAL SOURCES 300,000 45,000 255,000 255,000 COB_Bib P.o 07/27/2006 622 AM 5-29 DRAFT CITY OF RENTON PLANNING/BUILDING/PUBLIC WORKS TRANSPORTATION SYSTEMS DIVISION 2007-2012 SIX-YEAR TIP School Zone Sign Upgrades Functional Classification: N/A Fund: 317 Proj.Length: N/A Proj: 12504 Type: 5-OPERATIONS AND SAFETY RANK: 30 CONTACT: Dave Whitmarsh 425.430.7423 DESCRIPTION: STATUS: Three-year program to upgrade school zone signs to electronic flashing operation. Further grant opportunities will continue to be evaluated. JUSTIFICATION: CHANGES: Response to citizen concerns. These signs provide a clear directive to the motoring public. The Washington Traffic Safety Commission(WTSC)awarded a School Zone Flashing Lights grant for$52,500. The funding will pay for flashing school zone lights at four elementary school sites, limited to the cost of the signs and software. The total cost of the grant project is$89,500(City match of$37,000 for staff and vehicles for installation). The four schools are: Kennydale,Talbot Hill, Highlands,and Sierra Heights. (Funded : 1300.000 )Unfunded: 1 Project Totals Programmed Pre-2007 Six-Year Program ITEM Programmed Spent Pre-2006 2006 Total 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 EXPENSES: Project Development Precon Eng/Admin R-O-W(includes Admin) Construction Contract Fee Construction Enq/Admin Other 300,000 100,000 200,000 100,000 100,000 TOTAL EXPENSES 300,000 100,000 200,000 100,000 100,000 SOURCE OF FUNDS: Vehicle Fuel Tax Business License Fee 247,500 47,500 200,000 100,000 100,000 Proposed Fund Balance Grants In-Hand 52,500 52,500 Mitigation In-Hand Bonds/L.I.D.'s Formed Other In-Hand Grants Proposed Mitigation Proposed L.I.D.'s Proposed Other Proposed Undetermined TOTAL SOURCES 300,000 100,000_ 200,000 100,000 100,000 s Coad ml2V2 6 8:72 AM 5-30 DRAFT k ( k _ CITY OF RENTON PLANNING/BUILDING/PUBLIC WORKS TRANSPORTATION SYSTEMS DIVISION 2007-2012 SIX-YEAR TIP Arterial Rehabilitation Program Functional Classification: Various Fund: 317 Proj.Length: N/A Proj: 12186 Type: 1 -INFRASTRUCTURE RANK: 31 CONTACT: James Wlhoit 425.430.7319 DESCRIPTION: STATUS: As funding is available,this program will provide for the rehabilitation of arterial streets where the Proposed paving schedule:2006-NE 4th St.,2007-NE 12th.,2008-NE 3rd St.,2009- restoration requirements are beyond that which can be accomplished through the annual Overlay South Carr Rd.,2010-Puget Dr.SE. $200,000 in King County Metro Mitigation funding Program. was used in 2004/2005. JUSTIFICATION: CHANGES: The Overlay Program concentrates to a great degree on maintaining residential streets,where Installation of ADA compliant curb ramps has been incorporated into the annual Arterial relatively small traffic volumes and less truck and bus traffic make standard asphalt overlays a Rehabilitation and Overlay programs according to new federal requirements. $500,000 is long term means of maintenance. Arterial streets can often deteriorate rather quickly and often shown in 2009 for potential roadway improvements necessary if an annexation occurs in require more costly rehabilitation measures and/or costly temporary repairs to avoid more extensive deterioration. A number of arterials identified as needing major rehabilitaion are being the vicinity of Duvall Ave.NE. The annexation agreement is still to be determined with addressed in this program and the Overlay Program. King County,as is the detailed project cost estimate. [Funded: 12,320,000 [Unfunded: 175,000 Project Totals Programmed Pre-2007 Six-Year Program ITEM Programmed Spent in 2005 2006 Total 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 EXPENSES: Project Development Precon Eng/Admin 6%000' 9,000 60,000 10,000 10,000 10,000 10,000. 10,000 10,000 R-O-W(includes Admin) Construction Contract Fee 1,757,000 195,000 222,000 1,340,000 220,000 340,000 240,000 180,000 180,000 180,000 Construction Eng/Admin 69,000 9,000 60,000 10,000 10,000 10,000 10,000 10,000 10,000 Other 500,000 500,000 500,000 TOTAL EXPENSES 2,395,000 195,000 240,000 1,960,000 240,000 360,000, 760,000 200,000 200,000 200,000 SOURCE OF FUNDS: - Vehicle Fuel Tax 350,000 350,000 210,000 40,000 100,000 Business License Fee 565,000 55,000, 510,000 55,000 150,000 95,000 135,000, 75,000 Proposed Fund Balance 445,000 445,000 185,000 210,000 50,000 Grants In-Hand Mitigation In-Hand 460,000 195000 185,000 80,000 80,000, Bonds/L.I.D.'s Formed Other In-Hand(KC Annex.) 500,000, - 500,000 , 500,000 Grants Proposed Mitigation Proposed _ L.I.D.'s Proposed Other Proposed Undetermined 75,000 75,000 25,000 25,000, 25,000 TOTAL SOURCES 2,395,000 195,000 240,000, 1,960,000 240,000 360,000_ 760,000 200,000 200,00 200,000 �,�,�,pNrE 07/272006 071 AM 5-31 DRAFT CITY OF RENTON PLANNING/BUILDING/PUBLIC WORKS TRANSPORTATION SYSTEMS DIVISION 2007-2012 SIX-YEAR TIP Duvall Ave NE -SR-900 to North City Limits Functional Classification: Minor Arterial Fund: 317 Proj.Length: 1.67 miles Proj: 12123 Type: 1 -INFRASTRUCTURE RANK: 32 CONTACT: James Wilhoit 425.430.7319 DESCRIPTION: STATUS: Widening roadway to 5 lanes,includes:curbs,sidewalks,storm drainage,street lighting,channelization, Right-of-way acquisition underway. Delays due to drainage re-design and right-of-way and bikeway from SR-900 to the North City limits. issues. Construction contract planned for 2006. Received a TIB grant in partnership with King County;the City of Newcastle also received a TIB grant for their section of Coal Creek Parkway. The City of Renton's grant award is$3,095,640. The City is managing King County's project separately. JUSTIFICATION: CHANGES: Growing residential areas use this route which is also becoming a major through route between Renton Increases in anticipated right-of-way costs, increased construction contract estimate and and Bellevue,as well as freight traffic. proportional increase in construction engineering/administration cost estimate. Funding spent tracked through project spreadsheet, not Eden,due to project split-out. 'Funded : 14,968,200 'Unfunded: I Project Totals Programmed Pre-2007 Six-Year Program ITEM Programmed Spent Pre-2006 2006 Total 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 EXPENSES: Project Development Precon Eng/Admin 968,200 893,200 75,000 R-O-W(includes Admin) 600,000 50,000 550,000 Construction Contract Fee 3,100,000 1,000,000 2,100,000 1,550,000 550,000 Construction Eng/Admin 300,000 100,000 200,000 150,000 50,000 Other TOTAL EXPENSES 4,968,200 943,200 1,725,000 2,300,000 1,700,000 600,000 SOURCE OF FUNDS: Vehicle Fuel Tax Business License Fee 38,474 22,274 16,200 16,200 Proposed Fund Balance 1,200,546 190,720 431,526 578,300 410,000 168,300 Grants In-Hand(TIB) 3,281,780 568,806 1,207,474 1,505,500 1,190,000 315,500 Mitigation In-Hand 447,400 161,400 86,000 200,000 100,000 100,000 Bonds/L.I.D:s Formed Other In-Hand _ Grants Proposed Mitigation Proposed _ L.I.D.'s Proposed Other Proposed Undetermined _ TOTAL SOURCES 4,968,200 943,200_ 1,725,000 2,300,000 1,700,000 600,000 Duvall 07/27/2008 872 AM 5-32 DRAFT ( (t. ,. - - ( t 1 CITY OF RENTON PLANNING/BUILDING/PUBLIC WORKS TRANSPORTATION SYSTEMS DIVISION 2007 -2012 SIX-YEAR TIP Railroad Crossing Safety Program Functional Classification: N/A Fund: 317 Proj.Length: N/A Proj: 12166 Type: 5-OPERATIONS AND SAFETY RANK: 33 CONTACT: Karl Hamilton 425.430.7220 DESCRIPTION: STATUS: Install railroad crossing upgrade improvements at locations determined to warrant safety Concrete railroad crossing upgrades completed in 2002: Bronson/Houser mainline,SW improvements. Depending on the needs of the location,work could include rubber crossing 7th Street, Lind Avenue SW spurs,and Mill Avenue. Moved the Railroad Crossing Safety pads,lighted or unlighted signing,motion detectors,gates and connections to traffic signals to Program grant to Lake Washington Blvd.-Park Ave. N to Coulon Park project in 2003. provide signal pre-emption. JUSTIFICATION: CHANGES: Railroad roadway crossings can present a serious safety concern that needs to be addressed when conditions warrant improvements. [Funded: 120,240 lUnfunded: 110,000 Project Totals Programmed Pre-2007 Six-Year Program ITEM Programmed Spent In 2005 2006 Total 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 EXPENSES: _ Project Development 240 240 Precon En_c/Admin 30,000 5,000 25,000 5,000, 10,000 10,000 R-O-W(includes Admin) Construction Contract Fee Construction Eng/Admin _ Other TOTAL EXPENSES 30,240 240 5,000 25,000 5,0001 10,000 10,000 SOURCE OF FUNDS: ` Vehicle Fuel Tax Business License Fee 20,240 240 5,000 15,000 5,000, 10,000 Proposed Fund Balance Grants In-Hand Mitigation In-Hand _ Bonds/L.I.D.'s Formed Other In-Hand Grants Proposed Mitigation Proposed _ - L.I.D.'s Proposed Other Proposed Undetermined 10,000 10,000 10,000 TOTAL SOURCES 30,240 240 5000 25,000 5,000_ 10,000 10,000 RRJ(lrup 07/27/2000 0.22 AM 5-33 DRAFT CITY OF RENTON PLANNING/BUILDING/PUBLIC WORKS TRANSPORTATION SYSTEMS DIVISION 2007-2012 SIX-YEAR TIP Transportation Demand Management Program Functional Classification: N/A Fund: 317 Proj.Length: N/A Proj: 12135 Type: 2-MULTI-MODAL/TDM RANK: 34 CONTACT: Nate Jones 425.430.7217 DESCRIPTION: STATUS: Renton's TDM program implements the State's Commute Trip Reduction(CTR)Act by encouraging a It is expected that technical assistance to employers for the Citywide program will continue reduction in the use of single occupancy vehicles(SOV). Incentives are offered to employees(at at current levels in future years provided State funds in support of this program continue. businesses with 100 or more employees)arriving to work between 6 and 9 AM. The City has two CTR Renton receives a State allotment every two years to help fund the Citywide CTR program. programs: 1.The Citywide and 2.the City Hall CTR program(see note below). The TIP funds the The actual amount is determined by the number of CTR-affected worksites and the number Citywide CTR Program and offers technical assistance to Renton businesses affected by the Act. of trips reduced. JUSTIFICATION: CHANGES: The City is required by 1991 State Legislation to develop and implement a CTR program. This law applies Worksite count has remained stable. No changes are anticipated. to areas of the State with continuing air quality problems. TDM is an important element in achieving desired transportation,environmental,and land use goals. Note: Renton City Hall is an affected CTR site and must implement its own CTR program for City employees;it is funded outside the TIP program. (Funded : 1438,475 (Unfunded : I Project Totals Programmed Pre-2007 Six-Year Program _ ITEM Programmed Spent in 2005 2006 Total 2007 , 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 EXPENSES: Project Development 89,168 8,168 13,200 67,800 11,300, 11,300 11,300 11,300 11,300 11,300 Precon Enq/Admin 36,107 36,107 R-O-W(includes Admin) Construction Contract Fee Construction Eng/Admin Other(Tech.Assist.Contract) 313,200 51,000 262,200 43,700 43,700 43,700 43,700 43,700 43,700 TOTAL EXPENSES 438,475 44,275 64,200 330,000 55,000 55,000 55,000 55,000 55,000 55,000 SOURCE OF FUNDS: _ Vehicle Fuel Tax Business License Fee 94,104 1,104 15,000 78,000 13,000 13,000 13,000 13,000, 13,000 13,000 Proposed Fund Balance Grants In-Hand Mitigation In-Hand Bonds/L.I.D.'s Formed Other In-Hand(CTR allot.) 344,371 43,171 49,200 252,000 42,000 42,000 42,000 42,000 42,000 42,000 Grants Proposed • Mitigation Proposed L.I.D.'s Proposed _ Other Proposed Undetermined TOTAL SOURCES 438,475 44,275_ 64,200 330,000 55,000 55,000_ 55,000 55,000 55,000 55,000 TOM 07272008 8 22 AM 5-34 DRAFT ( ( ..- 44‘ ., • ( ( ( - CITY OF RENTON PLANNING/BUILDING/PUBLIC WORKS TRANSPORTATION SYSTEMS DIVISION 2007 -2012 SIX-YEAR TIP Transportation Concurrency/ LOS Program Functional Classification: N/A Fund: 317 Proj.Length: N/A Proj: 12107 Type: 4-ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT RANK: 35 CONTACT: Keith Woolley 425.430.7318 DESCRIPTION: STATUS: The City has created a city-wide Transportation Benefit Zone as part of the GMA Comprehensive Plan's On-going yearly program. 2003 funds were used for LOS documentation and inclusion in Transportation Concurrency requirements to provide a source of funds for transportation improvements the Comprehensive Plan. necessary to support new development. This project supports the necessary planning effort to determine appropriate fees to charge as part of the mitigation process,to adjust the fee due to transportation plan changes and other factors affecting the fees as a funding source and to monitor the funds collected. JUSTIFICATION: CHANGES: Management of the Transportation concurrency and mitigation programs are an integral part of planning Transportation concurrency travel times are anticipated to be updated in 2006/2007. transportation improvements,ensuring that new development pays a fair share of the cost,and in maintaining a level of service required under GMA to allow new development to be approved and to take place. 'Funded: 1140,000 lUnfunded: 120,000 Project Totals Programmed Pre-2007 Six-Year Program ITEM Programmed Spent In 2005 2006 Total 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 EXPENSES: Project Development 160,000 ', 40,000 120,000 20,000 W 40,000_ 10,000, 10,000 30,000 10,0001_ Precon Eng/Admin _ R-O-W(includes Admin) Construction Contract Fee . Construction Eng/Admin _ Other TOTAL EXPENSES 160,000 40,000 120,000 20,000 40,000, 10,000 10,000 30,000 10,000 SOURCE OF FUNDS: Vehicle Fuel Tax Business License Fee 140,000 40,000 100,000 20,000. 40,000_ 10,000 10,000, 10,000 10,000 Proposed Fund Balance _ Grants In-Hand r Mitigation In-Hand , Bonds/L.I.D.'s Formed , Other In-Hand Grants Proposed , Mitigation Proposed _ L.I.D.'s Proposed Other Proposed . Undetermined 20,000 20,000 20,000 TOTAL SOURCES 160,000_ 40,000 120,000 20000 40,000_ 10,000 10,000 30,000 10,000 Cor gyry„cy 07/27/2006 8 22A 5-35 DRAFT CITY OF RENTON PLANNING/BUILDING/PUBLIC WORKS TRANSPORTATION SYSTEMS DIVISION 2007-2012 SIX-YEAR TIP Missing Links Program - Functional Classification: N/A Fund: 317 Proj.Length: N/A Proj: 12106 Type: 5-OPERATIONS AND SAFETY RANK: 36 CONTACT: Ryan Plut 425.430.7372 DESCRIPTION: STATUS: This funding provides for the completion of transportation links that do not qualify for other With the ongoing development in the City,this funds potential City/developer partnership sources of funding. An example would be a section of roadway between two LID's or between opportunities. The City will continue to identify and complete the priority missing links. two developer mitigation improvement projects. JUSTIFICATION: CHANGES: Making the necessary,and often small-scale, improvements needed to connect other projects The City acquired three parcels from King County for right-of-way in 2006. can achieve significant benefits. (Funded : 1120,380 (Unfunded : 190,000 Project Totals Programmed Pre-2007 Six-Year Program ITEM Programmed Spent in 2005 2006 Total 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 EXPENSES: Project Development Precon Eng/Admin 28,000 4,000 24,000 4,000 4,000 4,000 4,000 4,000 4,000 R-O-W(includes Admin) 1,570 380 1,190 Construction Contract Fee 166,810 22,810 144,000 . 24,000 24,000 24,000 24,000 24,000 24000 Construction Eng/Admin 14,000 2,000, 12,000 2,000 2,000 2,000 2,000 2,000 2,000 Other TOTAL EXPENSES 210,380 380 30,000 180,000 30,000 30,000 30,000 30,000 30,000 30,000 SOURCE OF FUNDS: Vehicle Fuel Tax Business License Fee 120,380 380 30,000 90,000 _ 30,000 30,000 30,000 _ Proposed Fund Balance Grants In-Hand Mitigation In-Hand Bonds/L.I.D.'s Formed Other In-Hand _ Grants Proposed _ Mitigation Proposed . L.I.D's Proposed _ , Other Proposed Undetermined 90,000 90,000 ,' 30,000 30,000 30,000 TOTAL SOURCES 210,380_ 380 30,000 180,000 30,000 30,000 30,000 30,000 30,000 30,000 M Un,s O7/27/2C08 822 AM 5-36 DRAFT . ( ( ( CITY OF RENTON PLANNING/BUILDING/PUBLIC WORKS TRANSPORTATION SYSTEMS DIVISION 2007-2012 SIX YEAR TIP Geographic Information System - Needs Assessment Functional Classification: N/A Fund: 317 Proj.Length: N/A Proj: 12206 Type: 1 -INFRASTRUCTURE RANK: 37 CONTACT: Nate Jones 425.430.7217 DESCRIPTION: STATUS: Develop a Needs Assessment and Data Development Plan for Transportation Geographic Information City Transportation staff, in coordination with Technical Services and Information Services Systems(GIS)data and software development to meet the requirements of City's departmental staff,are working on a Needs Assessment for transportation-related GIS data. A work needs. plan is expected to be completed in 2006,and will be used to guide transportation-related GIS and software development. JUSTIFICATION: CHANGES: The Transportation Systems Division is interested in expanding the development and use of Transportation planning and modeling software,along with associated training and GIS technology,data,and applications to support the Division's business needs. Effective use of technical support,may be purchased in 2006. Intern staff may be required for this effort; GIS-related resources is dependent on careful planning and execution. The Needs Assessment the budget is adjusted to reflect this need. allows the evaluation of Division needs and the development of an action plan for logical development and implementation of GIS capability within the Division. 'Funded : 1116,700 'Unfunded: 160,000 Project Totals Programmed Pre-2007 Six-Year Program ITEM Programmed Spent in 2005 2006 Total 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 EXPENSES: Project Development 176,700 6,700' 35,000 135,000 35,000, 20,000 20,000 20,000 20,000 20,000 Precon Eng/Admin R-O-W(includes Admin) Construction Contract Fee Construction Eng/Admin . Other TOTAL EXPENSES 176,700 6,700 35,000 135,000 35,000 20,000 20,000 20,000 20,000 20,000 SOURCE OF FUNDS: Vehicle Fuel Tax Business License Fee 116,700 6,700 35,000 75,000 35,000 20,000 20_000 Proposed Fund Balance Grants In-Hand Mitigation In-Hand _, Bonds/L.I.D.'s Formed Other In-Hand ' Grants Proposed _ _ Mitigation Proposed _ L.I.D:s Proposed _ Other Proposed Undetermined 60,000 60,000 20,000 20,000 20,000 TOTAL SOURCES 176,700 6,700 35,000 135,000 35,000 20,0001 20,000 20,000 20,000 20,000 wa mrn0008 627AM 5-37 DRAFT CITY OF RENTON PLANNING/BUILDING/PUBLIC WORKS TRANSPORTATION SYSTEMS DIVISION 2007-2012 SIX-YEAR TIP Grady Way Corridor Study Functional Classification: Principal Arterial Fund: 317 Proj.Length: 0.44 miles Proj: 12127 Type: 2-MULTI-MODAL/TDM RANK: 38 CONTACT: Nathan Jones 425.430.7217 DESCRIPTION: STATUS: In conjunction with WSDOT,Sound Transit,and property owners along the corridor,perform a The City's Grady Way Study was added in 2003 to closely coordinate with WSDOTs comprehensive analysis of short-and long-range multi-modal transportation improvements. The City will proposed improvements for the I-405/SR 167 interchange,as well as with the Rainier conduct a pre-engineering study to evaluate short-and long-term traffic flow and safety improvements Avenue Corridor Study conducted by the City. Our coordination with WSDOT will assure along Grady Way including major intersections and traffic controls from Main Avenue to the West City that all proposed short-term and long-term improvements on these corridors will be Limits. compatible with one another and with long-range needs. JUSTIFICATION: CHANGES: The two freeway interchanges and freeways and the high volume surface level regional routes of SR 515, A project proposal for the Grady Way Study will be under development and review in 2006. Rainier Avenue, Lind Avenue,and Grady Way which converge in this area are of major importance to all Following review, a consultant selection process will be initiated, probably by late 2006. travel modes,including transit,freight, HOV,and general-purpose travel. Grady Way is a critical east to west link serving the south Renton area and the downtown Central Business District;the potential for operational problems and congestion is high if this corridor is not managed effectively. (Funded : 1213,421 (Unfunded : 13,060,000 Project Totals Programmed Pre-2007 Six-Year Program ITEM Programmed Spent Pre-2006 2006 Total 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 EXPENSES: ' Project Development 273,421 13,421 50,000 210,000 50,000 50,000 50,000 20,000 20,000 20,000 Precon Eng/Admin 250,000 250,000 210,000 40,000 R-O-W(includes Admin) 250,000 250,000 250,000 Construction Contract Fee 2,500,000 2,500,000 1,500,000, 1,000,000 Construction Eng/Admin Other TOTAL EXPENSES 3,273,421 13,421 50,000 3,210,000 50,000- 50,000 50,000 230,000 1,810,000_ 1,020,000 SOURCE OF FUNDS: Vehicle Fuel Tax Business License Fee 50,619 619 50,000 50,000 I Proposed Fund Balance Grants In-Hand _ Mitigation In-Hand 162,802 12,802 50,000 100,000 50,000 50,000 _ Bonds/L.I.D.'s Formed _ Other In-Hand Grants Proposed _ Mitigation Proposed L.I.D.'s Proposed Other Proposed Undetermined 3,060,000 3,060,000 230,000 1 810,000 1,020,000 TOTAL SOURCES 3,273,421 13,421 50,000 3,210,000 50,000 50,000 50,000 230,000 1,810,000 1,020,000 ark0y Coil 07/27/2000 522 AM 5-38 DRAFT (( `. . ( ( ( _ CITY OF RENTON PLANNING/BUILDING/PUBLIC WORKS TRANSPORTATION SYSTEMS DIVISION 2007 -2012 SIX-YEAR TIP Bicycle Route Development Program / Lake Washington Trail Connection Functional Classification: N/A Fund: 317 Proj.Length: N/A Proj: 12173 Type: 3-COMMUNITY LIVABILITY/ENHANCEMENT RANK: 39 CONTACT: Dan Hasty 425.430.7246 DESCRIPTION: STATUS: Partner with other City departments to further develop the City's non-motorized facilities. Sign Bicycle The Transportation Division has partnered with the Parks Department to submit grants for Routes along preferred corridors. Construct missing links in the bicycle route system. Construct site- the Lake Washington("Sam Chastain")Trail Connection. To-date,a$500,000 specific improvements. Upgrade routes as needed to safely accommodate bicycle traffic. Publicize Enhancement grant has been awarded. The Parks Department is the lead and the funds Renton bicycle network. Provides funding to match grant requests for bicycle planning and construction are noted in their capital fund. improvements. JUSTIFICATION: CHANGES: The City does not currently have a well-developed bicycle route system;this program will complete an The City was awarded two Federal Enhancement Grants: $500,000 to design the Lake integrated system of bicycle routes and trails and upgrade streets to better accommodate bicycles. Many Washington Trail connection with no match required and$100,000 to develop and produce locations along existing and potential routes have site-specific safety problems,which would be addressed a map that identifies a bicycle network with connections leading into and out of the City of in this program. Additionally,there is a strong demand for better-developed non-motorized facilities in Renton. Public outreach in various forms will be part of the effort to educate the public on Renton. using bicycle routes in the safest manner. The map will identify preferred routes,shared use paths,bicycle lanes,steep grades,etc. [Funded: 1186 701 (Unfunded : 1270.000 Project Totals Programmed Pre-2007 Six-Year Program Programmed Spent In 2005 2006 Total 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 EXPENSES: _ Project Development 20,701 10,701 10,000 10,000 _ Precon Eng/Admin 46,000 46,000 10,000 2,000 2,000 10,000 11,000 11,000 R-O-W(includes Admin) Construction Contract Fee 246,000 246,000 14,000 14,000 90,000 64,000 64,000 Construction Eng/Admin 24,000 24,000 2,000 2,000 10,000 5,000 5,000 Other 120,000 20,000 100,000 100„000 TOTAL EXPENSES 456,701 10,701 20,000 426,000 120,000 18,000 18,000 110,000 80,000 80,000 SOURCE OF FUNDS: r Vehicle Fuel Tax Business License Fee 86,701 1Q701 20,000 56,000 20,000 18,000, 18,000 Proposed Fund Balance _ Grants In-Hand 100,000, 100,000 100,000 Mitigation In-Hand Bonds/L.I.D.'s Formed Other In-Hand Grants Proposed Mitigation Proposed L.I.D.'s Proposed Other Proposed Undetermined 270,000 270,000 , 110,000 80,000 80,000 TOTAL SOURCES 456,701 10,701 20,000 426,000 120,000 18,000 18,000 110,000' 80,000 80,000 81b ROWe 07/27/2008 0.22 AM 5-39 DRAFT CITY OF RENTON PLANNING/BUILDING/PUBLIC WORKS TRANSPORTATION SYSTEMS DIVISION 2007-2012 SIX-YEAR TIP Lake Washington Blvd. - Park Ave N to Coulon Park Functional Classification: Collector Fund: 317 Proj.Length: N/A Proj: 12121 Type: 4-ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT RANK: 40 CONTACT: James Wilhoit 425.430.7318 DESCRIPTION: STATUS: This project includes road widening,traffic signals, railroad crossings,drainage,curb,gutter and Developer to design and construct,and get credit toward mitigation contribution. The sidewalks. developer is completing the project in 3 phases. Project received$185,000 Railroad Crossing Safety grant. Estimated contract costs and developer reimbursement is included. Railroad crossing construction complete except for signal start-up requirements. Waiting for developer to continue their construction. JUSTIFICATION: CHANGES: This project will serve the development and access needs to Coulon Park and to the Southport Remainder of project shown as unfunded until developer has definite schedule to build Development. office building. [Funded : 1401,563 lUnfunded : 1147.675 Project Totals Programmed Pre-2007 Six-Year Program ITEM Programmed Spent Pre-2006 2006 Total 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 EXPENSES: Project Development 16,038 14,638 1,400 1,400 Precon Enq/Admin R-O-W(includes Admin) Construction Contract Fee 502,992 292,492 210,500 78,500 132,000 Construction Eng/Admin 14,500 4,800 9,700 2,100 7,600 Other 15,708 11,208 4,500 2,500 2,000 TOTAL EXPENSES 549,238 323,138 226 100 84,500 141,600 SOURCE OF FUNDS: Vehicle Fuel Tax 14,490, 14,490 Business License Fee Proposed Fund Balance 5,720 5,720 Grants In-Hand 185,000 106,575 78,425 40,000 38,425 Mitigation In-Hand 196,353 196,353 Bonds/L.I.D.'s Formed , Other In-Hand Grants Proposed . Mitigation Proposed , L.I.D.'s Proposed Other Proposed Undetermined 147,675 147,675 44,500 103,175 TOTAL SOURCES 549,238 323,138 226,100 84,500 141,600 Lk_WA 07/17/1006 6'22 AM 5-40 DRAFT ( ( ( CITY OF RENTON PLANNING/BUILDING/PUBLIC WORKS TRANSPORTATION SYSTEMS DIVISION 2007-2012 SIX-YEAR TIP Environmental Monitoring Program Functional Classification: N/A Fund: 317 Proj.Length: N/A Proj: 12187 Type: 1 -INFRASTRUCTURE RANK: 41 CONTACT: Jason Fritzler 425.430.7243 DESCRIPTION: STATUS: Monitoring of wetland mitigation installed as a project environmental requirement and to perform biological The Year 3 report for the Oakesdale, Phase 1,site has been sent to the regulatory assessments as required by the Endangered Species Act. agencies for review. The Year 1 report for the Phase 2 site is being prepared. Phase 1 and 2 site maintenance continues. JUSTIFICATION: CHANGES: Monitoring ensures that the wetland vegetation installed is properly established. Creates an account to Attempts to get early acceptance for the Phase 1 site have been successful. The Corps of pay for unscheduled project environmental assessments. Engineers has allowed the City to reduce the monitoring requirements to match the site's success. (Funded : 1359,635 (Unfunded : (45,000 Project Totals Programmed Pre-2007 Six-Year Program ITEM Programmed Spent In 2005 2006 Total 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 EXPENSES: _ _ _ Prosect Development Precon Eng/Admin 105,000 15,000 90,000 15,000 15,000_ 15,000 15,000 15,000 15,000 1 R-O-W(includes Admin) Construction Contract Fee 45,000 10,000 35,000 10,000 5,000 5,000 5,000 5,000 5,000 Construction Eng/Admin 254,635 84,635 50,000 120,000 50,000 30,000 10,000 10,000 10,000 10,000 Other TOTAL EXPENSES 404,635 84,635 75,000 245,000 75,000 50,000 30000 30,000 30,000 30,000 SOURCE OF FUNDS: Vehicle Fuel Tax 5,000 5,000 5,000 Business License Fee 120,035 35 20,000 100,000 20,000_ 25,000 17500 12,500 10_000 15,000 Proposed Fund Balance _ Grants In-Hand Mitigation In-Hand 234,600 84,600 55,000 95,000 55,000 25,000 12,5007. 2,500 Bonds/L.I.D.'s Formed , Other In-Hand Grants Proposed Mitigation Proposed L.I.D.'s Proposed _ Other Proposed _ Undetermined 45,000 45,000 15,000 15,000 15,000 TOTAL SOURCES 404,635 84,635 75,000_ 245,000 75,000 50,000 30,000 30,000 30,000 30,000 E, a„ 07!2712008 022A 5-41 DRAFT CITY OF RENTON PLANNING/BUILDING/PUBLIC WORKS TRANSPORTATION SYSTEMS DIVISION 2007-2012 SIX-YEAR TIP Trans-Valley and Soos Creek Corridor Program Functional Classification: N/A Fund: 317 Type: 2-MULTI-MODAL/TDM Proj.Length: N/A Proj: 12191 RANK: 42 CONTACT: Keith Woolley 425.430.7318 DESCRIPTION: STATUS: A joint study with King County, Kent,Tukwila and SeaTac to evaluate long-term and short-term The Trans-Valley Study was completed in March 2002,providing documentation,research, multi-modal transportation improvements in the Soos Creek and Valley area. This program will priority corridor identification, and potential solution sets. Further work was placed on fund study and pre-design work plus matching funds for grant applications. indefinite hold by King County in 2003. JUSTIFICATION: CHANGES: This is an area with limited transportation facilities while experiencing high growth rates. The Carr Rd./SR 515 intersection project was cancelled by King County in 2005. Coordination will continue with WSDOT regarding the SR 167/SW 43rd St.interchange. (Funded: 127,539 'Unfunded : I Project Totals Programmed Pre-2007 Six-Year Program ITEM Programmed Spent Pre-2006 2006 Total 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 EXPENSES: Project Development 27,539 7,539 5,000 15,000 5,000 5,000 5,000 Precon Eng/Admin R-O-W(includes Admin) Construction Contract Fee Construction Enq/Admin Other TOTAL EXPENSES 27,539 7,539 5,000 15,000 5,000 5,000 5,000 SOURCE OF FUNDS: Vehicle Fuel Tax Business License Fee 27,539 7,539 5,000 15,000 5,000 5,000, 5,000 Proposed Fund Balance Grants In-Hand Mitigation In-Hand Bonds/L.I.D's Formed Other In-Hand Grants Proposed Mitigation Proposed L.I.D.'s Proposed , Other Proposed Undetermined TOTAL SOURCES 27,539 7,539 5,000 15,000 5,000 5,000 5,000, , Tnns_VN 07/27/200e a 22 AM 5-42 DRAFT ( ( ( r CITY OF RENTON PLANNING/BUILDING/PUBLIC WORKS TRANSPORTATION SYSTEMS DIVISION 2007-2012 SIX-YEAR TIP WSDOT Coordination Program Functional Classification: N/A Fund: 317 Proj.Length: N/A Proj: 12146 Type: 2-MULTI-MODAL/TDM RANK: 43 CONTACT: Sharon Griffin 425.430.7232 DESCRIPTION: STATUS: Provide pre-design,design and construction coordination for WSDOT projects within or Ongoing yearly program. Staff coordination on grant-funded projects. Staff coordination on adjacent to Renton to assure that those projects provide the maximum benefits and minimum the 1-405 Corridor Improvements is included in"1-405 Improvements in Renton." problems for Renton's transportation system. JUSTIFICATION: CHANGES: WSDOT projects can have signficant impacts within the City. ['Funded : 198,600 1Unfunded : Project Totals Programmed Pre-2007 Six-Year Program ITEM Programmed Spent in 2005 2006 Total 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 EXPENSES: Project Development 98,600_ 8,600 15,000 75,000 15,000 15,000 15,000 10,000 10,000 10,000 Precon Eng/Admin , R-O-W(includes Admin) _ Construction Contract Fee Construction Enq/Admin Other TOTAL EXPENSES 98,600 8,600 15,000 75,000 15,000 15,000 15,000 10,000 10,000 10,000 SOURCE OF FUNDS: Vehicle Fuel Tax Business License Fee 98,600 8,600 15,000 75,000 15,000 15,000, 15 000 10,000, 10,000 10,000 Proposed Fund Balance _ Grants In-Hand - , Mitigation In-Hand • Bonds/L.I.D.'s Formed Other In-Hand . • Grants Proposed Mitigation Proposed L.I.D.'s Proposed _ Other Proposed _Undetermined . TOTAL SOURCES 98,600 8,600 15,000 75,000 15,000 15,000 15,000 10,000 10,000. 10,000 www 022/04 5-43 DRAFT CITY OF RENTON PLANNING/BUILDING/PUBLIC WORKS TRANSPORTATION SYSTEMS DIVISION 2007-2012 SIX-YEAR TIP 1% for the Arts Program Functional Classification: N/A Fund: 317 Proj.Length: N/A Proj: 12112 Type: 3-COMMUNITY LIVABILITY/ENHANCEMENT RANK: 44 CONTACT: Sharon Griffin 425.430.7232 DESCRIPTION: STATUS: Beautify entrance locations to the City. Projects to include signing and landscaping. Funding is Program is now based on actual design and construction costs. 2001 was estimated and tied to the calculated share of eligible types of transportation projects and transportation funding the remainder from the actual costs was used for 2002 and part of 2003. $3,278 was subject to the City's1%for the Arts program. All gateway project proposals under this program transferred in 2004 to cover the remaining 2003 expenditures. $15,669 was transferred in are subject to approval of the Arts Commission. 2005 for 1%of 2004 expenditures. JUSTIFICATION: CHANGES: Displays a sense of civic pride. 2005 transfer upcoming. (Funded: 1305,669 (Unfunded : I Project Totals Programmed Pre-2007 Six-Year Program J ITEM Programmed Spent in 2005 2006 Total 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 EXPENSES: Project Development 7,000 1,000 6,000 1,000 1,000 1,000 1,000 1,000 1,000 Precon Enq/Admin R-O-W(includes Admin) Construction Contract Fee Construction Eng/Admin Other 298,669 15,669 59,000 224,000 59,000 29,000 29,000 49,000 29,000 29,000 TOTAL EXPENSES 305,669 15,669 60,000 230,000 60,000 30,000 30,000 50,000 30,000 30,000 SOURCE OF FUNDS: Vehicle Fuel Tax Business License Fee 305,669, 15,669 60,000 230,000 60,000_ 30,000 30,000, 5Q000 30,000 30,000 Proposed Fund Balance Grants In-Hand Mitigation In-Hand Bonds/L.I.D.'s Formed Other In-Hand Grants Proposed Mitigation Proposed L.I.D.'s Proposed - Other Proposed Undetermined TOTAL SOURCES 305,669 15,669 60,000 230,000 60,000 30,000 30,000 50,000 30,000 30,000 ,x Art. 07/272006 e:22 Mt 5-44 DRAFT ( .. ( ( ( . , CITY OF RENTON PLANNING/BUILDING/PUBLIC WORKS TRANSPORTATION SYSTEMS DIVISION 2007-2012 SIX-YEAR TIP Arterial HOV Program Functional Classification: N/A Fund: 317 Proj.Length: N/A Proj: 12160 Type: 2-MULTI-MODAL/TDM RANK: 45 CONTACT: Keith Woolley 425.430.7318 DESCRIPTION: STATUS: Perform a comprehensive analysis of short and long term HOV needs for the Renton area and HOV Arterial Study to identify specific improvements along three corridors has been develop a prioritized list with cost estimates of recommended arterial improvements,such as completed. Sound Transit Direct Access Program will need to do pre-design work and HOV lanes, HOV queue jumps,park and ride lots and other HOV facilities. Also provides construction in upcoming years. funding in future years for construction of high priority projects as they are identified. JUSTIFICATION: CHANGES: Development of arterial HOV improvements will be necessary to promote the use and efficiency of transit and other HOV mobility options. Funding from this program will be directed to individual projects with HOV facilities as those projects move forward. [Funded: 1142,354 !Unfunded : I Project Totals Programmed Pre-2007 Six-Year Program _ ITEM Programmed Spent Pre-2006 2006 Total 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 'EXPENSES: r Project Development 141,474 121,474 10,000 10,000 5,000 5,000 Precon Eng/Admin 880 880_ R-O-W(includes Admin) Construction Contract Fee Construction Eng/Admin Other _ TOTAL EXPENSES 142,354 122,354 10,000 10,000 5,000 5,000 SOURCE OF FUNDS: Vehicle Fuel Tax Business License Fee 61,210 41,2101 10,000 10,000 5,000 5 000 Proposed Fund Balance Grants In-hand(ISTEA) 81,144 81,144_ _ Mitigation In-Hand Bonds/L.I.D.'s Formed Other In-Hand Grants Proposed Mitigation Proposed L.I.D.'s Proposed Other Proposed Undetermined TOTAL SOURCES 142,354 122,354 10,000 10,000 5,000 5,000 AjHOV 07/27/2008 8:72 AM 5-45 DRAFT CITY OF RENTON PLANNING/BUILDING/PUBLIC WORKS TRANSPORTATION SYSTEMS DIVISION 2007-2012 SIX-YEAR TIP Benson Rd S/S 31st St Functional Classification: Minor Arterial Fund: 317 Proj.Length: Intersection Proj: 12129 Type: 5-OPERATIONS AND SAFETY RANK: 46 CONTACT: Bob Cavanaugh 425.430.7222 DESCRIPTION: STATUS: Install a completely actuated traffic signal at Benson Rd S and S 31st St designed to provide for possible King County is the lead agency for determining when this project will proceed. They have future Benson Rd.widening. completed design and would like to proceed to construction once the interlocal agreement is agreed upon. JUSTIFICATION: CHANGES: The location is approaching signal warrants and the traffic volume is increasing. The signal will reduce Schedule may be accelerated pending interlocal agreement. Project costs reflect the City's side street delays and improve safety. share of the project. 'Funded: 1350,000 'Unfunded : 1 Project Totals Programmed Pre-2007 Six-Year Program ITEM Programmed Spent Pre-2006 2006 Total 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 EXPENSES: Project Development Precon Enq/Admin 110,000 110,000 110,000 R-O-W(includes Admin) 9,000 9,000 9,000 Construction Contract Fee 168,000 _ 168,000 168,000, Construction Eng/Admin 48,000 48,000 48,000 Other 15,000 15,000 15,000 TOTAL EXPENSES 350,000 350,000 350,000 SOURCE OF FUNDS: 1/2 Cent Gas Tax Business License Fee 44,200 44,200 44,200 Proposed Fund Balance 305,800 305,800 305,800 Grants In-Hand _ Mitigation In-Hand L.I.D.'s Formed Other In-Hand Grants Proposed Mitigation Proposed L.I.D.'s Proposed Other Proposed • Undetermined TOTAL SOURCES 350,000 350,000 350,000 B�rMon-3t.t 07/27/2 622 AM 5-46 DRAFT CITY OF RENTON PLANNING/BUILDING/PUBLIC WORKS TRANSPORTATION SYSTEMS DIVISION 2007-2012 SIX-YEAR TIP Park-Sunset Corridor-Garden Avenue to Duvall Avenue Functional Classification: Principal Fund: 317 Proj.Length: N/A Proj: 12177 Type: 2-MULTI-MODAL/TDM RANK: 47 CONTACT: Keith Woolley 425.430.7318 DESCRIPTION: STATUS: Identify and construct traffic operational improvements as needed throughout the corridor. A study is being coordinated with Highlands Subarea transportation study. JUSTIFICATION: CHANGES: This important corridor is subject to high growth in travel demand. The Highlands Subarea study needs to develop land use alternatives and conduct the transportation analysis. Results of this transportation analysis will be used in generating a corridor study scope of work. [Funded: [339,904 [Unfunded : 12 760,100 Project Totals Programmed Pre-2007 Six-Year Program ITEM Programmed Spent Pre-2006 2006 Total 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 EXPENSES: .1 Project Development _ 13%904 14,904. 50,000_ 75,000 25,000 50,000, , Precon Eng/Admin 200,000 200,000 200,000 R-0 W(includes Admin) 1 Construction Contract Fee 2,591,000 2,591,000` 1,591,000 1,000,000 Construction Eng/Admin _ 169 100, 169,100 V � 159,100 10,000 Other TOTAL EXPENSES 3,100,004 14,904' 50,000 3,035,100 ` 25,000 50,000 200,000 1,750,100 1,010,000 "SOURCE OF FUNDS: _ Vehicle Fuel Tax Business License Fee 104,904 14,904 90,000 90,000 - _ Proposed Fund Balance _ Grants In-Hand _ Mitigation In-Hand 235,000 — 50,000 185,000 , 25,000. 50,000 110000 _ Bonds/L.I.D.'s Formed _ Other In-Hand . Grants Proposed Mitigation Proposed _ L.I.D.'s Proposed _ Other Proposed . _ + _ Undetermined 2,760,100 2,760,100 , 1,750,100 1,010,000 TOTAL SOURCES' 3,100,004 14,904 50,000 3,035,100 25,000 50,000 200,000 1,750,100 1,010,000, NOLSo se, 07/27i200e 622 AM 5-47 DRAFT CITY OF RENTON PLANNING/BUILDING/PUBLIC WORKS TRANSPORTATION SYSTEMS DIVISION 2007 -2012 SIX-YEAR TIP Lind Avenue-SW 16th St to SW 43rd St Functional Classification: Minor Arterial Fund: 317 Proj.Length: 1.69 miles Proj: 24 Type: 5-OPERATIONS AND SAFETY RANK: 48 CONTACT: Keith Woolley 425.430.7318 DESCRIPTION: STATUS: Widen existing roadway to 5 lanes where required. Includes new roadway,curbs,sidewalks, The needs,priorities and schedules for improvements on Lind Avenue will be drainage,signals, lighting,signing and channelization. determined through Arterial Circulation studies. Construction of a signal at the intersection of Lind Av and SW 27th St occurred in 1998 as an initial phase. JUSTIFICATION: CHANGES: Increasing traffic demands in the Valley including the proposed development at the Boeing Increases in traffic in the Renton Valley,due in part to development,will increase the need Longacres site,will create the need for increasing the capacity of this major north/south arterial. for improvements. A potential project is a signal installation at the intersection at Lind Ave. SW and SW 34th St. (currently unsignalized). Additionally,improvements may result from future WSDOT 1-405 plans which include an interchange at Lind Ave.(currently unfunded) IFunded: 115,000 (Unfunded: 12,540,000 Project Totals Programmed Pre-2007 Six-Year Program ITEM Programmed Spent Pre-2006 2006 Total 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 EXPENSES: Project Development 10,000 5,000 5,000 5,000 Precon Enq/Admin 83,000 83,000 , 5,000 78,000 R-O-W(includes Admin) Construction Contract Fee 2,280,000 2,280,000 1,700,000 580,000 Construction Eng/Admin 182,000 182,000 136,000 46,000 Other TOTAL EXPENSES 2,555,000 5,000 2,550,000 5,000 5,000 1,914,000 626,000 SOURCE OF FUNDS: Vehicle Fuel Tax _ _ Business License Fee Proposed Fund Balance Grants In-Hand Mitigation In-Hand 15,000 5,000 10,000 5,000 5,000 Bonds/L.I.D.'s Formed Other In-Hand Grants Proposed 830,000 830,000 630,000 200,000 Mitigation Proposed _ - L.I.D.'s Proposed Other Proposed Undetermined 1,710,000 1710,000 1,284,000 426,000 TOTAL-SOURCES 2,555,000 5,000 2550,000 5,000 5,000 1,914,000 626,000 UM07/27/2006 a 22 AM 5-48 DRAFT ., _ � . • -' ( t ( CITY OF RENTON PLANNING/BUILDING/PUBLIC WORKS TRANSPORTATION SYSTEMS DIVISION 2007-2012 SIX-YEAR TIP SR 169 HOV- 140th Way SE to SR-900 Functional Classification: Principal Fund: 317 Proj.Length: N/A Proj: 12175 Type: 2-MULTI-MODAL/TDM RANK: 49 CONTACT: Rob Lochmiller 425.430.7303 DESCRIPTION: STATUS: Construct queue jumps and bypass lanes that provide transit priority traffic signal improvements on SR- WSDOT committed$300,000 to design and$450,000 to construction. King County built a 169(Maple Valley Hwy.)at 140th Way SE and in the area 1-405. Involves roadway widening at holding pond at 140th Way SE for our use($275,000 value). Design is completed for total intersection approaches and modifications to channelization and traffic signals,and widening to improve buildout,as well as phased re-designs. Grant awards: $2,208,000 from TIB(R/VV and the north-bound on ramp and south-bound off ramp movement at the I-405/SR 169 interchange. Improve construction), $392,947 TEA-21 Countywide funds(construction),$765,993 TEA-21 access to Cedar River Park and Stoneway site through traffic modifications. Countywide for Ph.2(construction), $2.5 M State legislature from gas tax revenue for 2007- 2009 hianniiim(Ph 3) JUSTIFICATION: CHANGES: This is a high volume,high congestion corridor where providing travel time benefits for transit and car/van The portion of work at the 1-405 location are now phased. Phase 1 construct the signal, pools can be achieved with high cost effectiveness. Also there are severe congestion and safety access road and parking lot. Phase 2 will construct the widening improvements on SR 169. problems that can be addressed by adding a right turn lane west-bound on SR-169 and a protected right Funds in 2010 are an estimate for removal of the Parks Maintenance building. turn lane from the 1-405 northbound off ramp on to east-bound SR-169. *Council allocated$1.2 million from the King County Metro mitigation fund which is included in"proposed fund balance"). lFunded : 19,030,597 (Unfunded : J Project Totals Programmed Pre-2007 Six-Year Program ITEM Programmed Spent Pre-2006 2006 Total 2007 2008 _ 2009 2010 2011 2012 EXPENSES: Project Development Precon Eng/Admin 1,120,452 1,010,452 50,000 60,000 50,000, 10,000 J R-0 W(includes Admin) 500,000 500,000 Construction Contract Fee 6,650,736 600,736 3,500,000 2,550,000 2,250,000 300,000 -I Construction Eng/Admin 759,409 27,209 422,200 310,000 30,000, 250,000_ 30,000 Other TOTAL EXPENSES 9,030,597 1,638,397 4,472,200 2,920,000 30,000 2,550,000_ 340,000 SOURCE OF FUNDS: Vehicle Fuel Tax _ Business License Fee 397,200 197,200 200,000 200,000 , Proposed Fund Balance* 2,076,897_ 825,897 1,201,000 50,000 50,000 Grants In-Hand(TIB/TEA-21) 2,974,000 2,974,000 Mitigation In-Hand 782,500 512,500_ 100,000 170,000 30,000. 140,000 _ Bonds/L.I.D.'s Formed Other(WSDOT&State Leg.) 2,800,000 300,000 2,500,000 2,500,000_ Grants Proposed Mitigation Proposed L.I.D.'s Proposed _ Other Proposed . Undetermined _ TOTAL SOURCES 9,030,597 1,638,397 4,472,200 2,920,000 30,000 2,550,000_ 340,000 SR7eo XOV mmrzwa 0322)W 5-49 DRAFT CITY OF RENTON PLANNING/BUILDING/PUBLIC WORKS TRANSPORTATION SYSTEMS DIVISION 2007-2012 SIX-YEAR TIP NE Sunset By/ Duvall Ay NE Functional Classification: Minor Arterial Fund: 317 Proj.Length: Proj: 12301 Type: 5-OPERATIONS AND SAFETY RANK: 50 CONTACT: James Wilhoit 425.430.7319 DESCRIPTION: STATUS: The project will realign and rechannelize lanes approaching,through and exiting the intersection,add an The construction contract has been awarded. The project includes an HES grant for eastbound left-turn lane,modify the traffic signals,and extend a drop lane. The modification of the fully $396,000. Ineligible costs reflect items outside the original scope of the grant such as actuated traffic signal will include poles,signal and pedestrian displays,detection loops,emergency pre- extending lane lengths required by WSDOT(on state route)and additional drainage emption,and a new signal controller. improvements to the area. (Funding spent tracked through project spreadsheet,not Eden, due to project split-out.) JUSTIFICATION: CHANGES: The intersection experiences a high number of accidents including turning movements,rear ends,and Project increase to cover bids exceeding engineer's estimate has been approved by City side swipes. Council. 'Funded: [1,698,000 [Unfunded: l Project Totals Programmed Pre-2007 Six-Year Program ITEM Programmed _ Spent Pre-2006 2006 Total 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 EXPENSES: Project Development Precon Enq/Admin 113,300 113,100 200 R-O-W(includes Admin) Construction Contract Fee 1,168,200 1,150,200 18,000 18,000 Construction Eng/Admin 227,500 7,500 210,000 10,000 10,000 Other(Ineligible costs) 189,000 23,000 164,000 2,000 2,000 TOTAL EXPENSES 1,698,000 143,600 1,524,400 30,000 30,000 SOURCE OF FUNDS: Vehicle Fuel Tax Business License Fee 122,800 59,500 33,300 30,000 30,000 Proposed Fund Balance 950,100 25,300 924,800 Grants In-Hand(HES) 396,000 29,700 366,300 Mitigation In-Hand 229,100 29,100 200,000 Bonds/L.I.D's Formed Other In-Hand Grants Proposed Mitigation Proposed _ L.I.D.'s Proposed Other Proposed Undetermined TOTAL SOURCES 1,698,000 143,600 1,524,400 30,000 30,000 SumNNwaM 07i27/2006 a 22 AM 5-50 DRAFT CITY OF RENTON PLANNING/BUILDING/PUBLIC WORKS TRANSPORTATION SYSTEMS DIVISION 2007-2012 SIX-YEAR TIP Logan Av N Concrete Panel Repair Functional Classification: Principal Arterial Fund: 317 Proj.Length: N/A Proj: 12303 Type: 1 -INFRASTRUCTURE RANK: 51 CONTACT: James Wllhoit 425.430.7319 DESCRIPTION: STATUS: Location: From the Logan Avenue Bridge north to N 6th St. Repair concrete panels under the asphalt to stop the panels from moving. JUSTIFICATION: CHANGES: The panels are moving,causing the asphalt overlay to severely spall at the joints. Low priority. (Funded : I (Unfunded : 1460,000 Project Totals Programmed Pre-2007 Six-Year Program ITEM Programmed Spent In 2005 2006 Total 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 EXPENSES: Project Development 25,000 25,000 25,000 Precon Eng/Admin 25,000 25,00025,000, R-O-W(includes Admin) . Construction Contract Fee 400,000 40Q000 400,000 Construction Eng/Admin 10,000 10,000 10,000 Other TOTAL EXPENSES 460,000_ 460,000 460,000 SOURCES OF FUNDS: _ Vehicle Fuel Tax Business License Fee - Proposed Fund Balance Grants In-Hand _ , Mitigation In-Hand , Bonds/L.I.D's Formed _ . Other In-Hand , Grants Proposed . Mitigation Proposed L.I.D.'s Proposed Other Proposed Undetermined 460,000 460,000 460,000 TOTAL SOURCES 460,000 460,000 460,000 mmnwe en/M 5-51 DRAFT CITY OF RENTON PLANNING/BUILDING/PUBLIC WORKS TRANSPORTATION SYSTEMS DIVISION 2007-2012 SIX-YEAR TIP S Carr Rd/Mill Avenue S Functional Classification: Principal Arterial Fund: 317 Proj.Length: N/A Proj: 12304 Type: 5-OPERATIONS AND SAFETY RANK: 52 CONTACT: Keith Woolley 425.430.7318 DESCRIPTION: STATUS: Install new traffic signal, including poles,signal and pedestrian displays,detection loops,emergency pre- Project currently at the planning level,being coordinated with Development Services/new emption,a new signal controller,and associated channelization. Also,construct roadway widening to developments,the King County Carr Rd project,and New Horizons private school. accommodate turning lanes. JUSTIFICATION: CHANGES: A traffic signal is warranted based on vehicular volumes,delay,and safety. New developments north of the intersection have been required to participate with the City. Adjacent private school desires to participate in order to realign their access to become the fourth leg to signalized intersection. King County Carr Rd Corridor project possibly will widen and/or realign Carr Rd through this project site. A signal will provide a safe,pedestrian environment and crossing of Carr Rd. IFunded : 138,000 'Unfunded : 1750,000 Project Totals Programmed Pre-2007 Six Year Program ITEM Programmed Spent in 2005 2006 Total 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 EXPENSES: Protect Development 18,000 3,000 15,000 5,000 10,000 Precon Eng/Admin 60,000 60,000 20,000, 40,000 R-O-W(includes Admin) 100,000 100,000 100,000' Construction Contract Fee 300,000 300,000 300,000 Construction Eng/Admin 310,000 310,000 200,000 100,000 10,000 Other TOTAL EXPENSES 788,000 3,000 785,000 5,000 10,000 20,000 340,000 400,000 10,000 SOURCES OF FUNDS: Vehicle Fuel Tax Business License Fee 38,000 3,000 35,000 5,000 10,000 20,000 Proposed Fund Balance , Grants In-Hand _ Mitigation In-Hand _ Bonds/L.I.D.'s Formed Other In-Hand - Grants Proposed _ • Mitigation Proposed _ L.I.D.'s Proposed Other Proposed _ Undetermined 750,000 750,000 340,000 400,000 10,000 TOTAL SOURCES 788,000 3,000 785,000 5,000 10,000 20,000 340,000 400,000 10,000 CM-MM 071272006 a 22 AM 5-52 DRAFT (tv, ( (it,,, -; . a CITY OF RENTON PLANNING/BUILDING/PUBLIC WORKS TRANSPORTATION SYSTEMS DIVISION 2007-2012 SIX-YEAR TIP Houser Way S -Main Av S to Burnett Av S Functional Classification: Non-arterial Fund: 317 Proj.Length: 0.2 miles Proj: 12213 Type: 5-OPERATIONS AND SAFETY RANK: 53 CONTACT: James wllhoit 425.430.7319 DESCRIPTION: STATUS: Upgrade railroad tracks to concrete on Houser Way S between Main Avenue S and Burnette Discussions with Burlington Northern Santa Fe(BNSF)railroad to share funding on this Avenue S. project were initiated in 2003. BNSF indicated by letter of 5/20/03 that it was not interested in the City's proposal. The project remains unfunded. JUSTIFICATION: CHANGES: This segment of roadway has a pavement management OCI rating(Year 2003)as low as between 0 and 12 points(out of a possible 100 points). The quality of the roadway is very poor due to the flexing of the tracks. An overlay will only be effective if the tracks are placed in concrete. I Funded :1 L Unfunded :I_ 810,000 Project Totals Programmed Pre-2007 Six-Year Program ITEM Programmed Spent Pre-2006 2006 Total 2007 2008_ 2009 2010 2011 2012 EXPENSES: _ Project Development Precon Eng/Admin _ R-O-W(includes Admin) _ Construction Contract Fee 800,000 800,000 800,000 Construction Eng/Admin 10,000 10,000 _ 10,000 Other TOTAL EXPENSES 810,000 810,000 810,000 SOURCE OF FUNDS: Vehicle Fuel Tax _ Business License Fee _ • Proposed Fund Balance Grants In-Hand Mitigation In-Hand Bonds/L.I.D.'s Formed Other In-Hand Grants Proposed _ Mitigation Proposed _ L.I.D.'s Proposed _ _ Other Proposed(BNSF) 480,000 480,000 480,000 Undetermined ' 330,000 330,000 330,000 TOTAL SOURCES 810,000 810,000 810,000 ` Heu..ro*. mmnwe 622,0.4 5-53 DRAFT • CITY OF RENTON PLANNING/BUILDING/PUBLIC WORKS TRANSPORTATION SYSTEMS DIVISION 2007-2012 SIX-YEAR TIP Duvall Ave NE (Coal Creek Parkway) -King County Functional Classification: Minor Arterial Fund: 317 Proj.Length: Proj: 12305 Type: 1 -INFRASTRUCTURE RANK: 54 CONTACT: James Wilhoit 425.430.7319 DESCRIPTION: STATUS: Widening roadway to 5 lanes,includes:curb,gutter,sidewalk,drainage improvements,street lighting, Delays due to drainage re-design. The City is managing the King County project with full channelization,signal modification and interconnection,and bikeway from Renton's north city limits to SE reimbursement from the County per approved interlocal agreement. All programmed 95th Way(Newcastle's south city limits). funding is subject to King County's ongoing approval. King County manages the grant reimbursement for their TIB grant award of$3,196,000. Due to project split-out,funding is tracked through project spreadsheet, not Eden. JUSTIFICATION: CHANGES: Growing residential areas use this route which is also becoming a major through route between Renton Increases in City in-house labor for pre-construction engineering/administration. and Bellevue,as well as freight traffic. There are currently two general-purpose lanes with little or no pedestrian facilities,and left-turn lanes at various locations. Because there are uncompleted gaps between the five-lane sections from unincorporated King County to Sunset By.,the arterial exhibits congestion and travel-time delays for all modes of traffic. !Funded: 14,593.946 'Unfunded: I Project Totals Programmed Pre-2007 Six-Year Program ITEM Programmed Spent Pre-2006 2006 Total 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 EXPENSES: Project Development Precon Eng/Admin 732,646 586,946 145,700 R-O-W(includes Admin) Construction Contract Fee 3,707,300 1,200,000 2,507,300 1,900,000 607,300 Construction Eng/Admin 154,000 50,000 104,000 75,000 29,000 Other TOTAL EXPENSES 4,593,946 586,946 1,395,700 2,611,300 1,975,000 636,300 SOURCE OF FUNDS: Vehicle Fuel Tax Business License Fee Proposed Fund Balance Grants In-Hand Mitigation In-Hand Bonds/L.I.D.'s Formed Other In-Hand(King County) 4,593,946 459,236 1,523,410 2,611,300 _ 1,975,000 636,300_ _ Grants Proposed Mitigation Proposed L.I.D.'s Proposed Other Proposed - Undetermined TOTAL SOURCES 4,593,946 459,236 1,523,410 2,611,300 1,975,000_ 636,300 Ow.&Y0rp COMAV 07/27,2006 622AM 5-54 DRAFT 'fro SECTION SIX APPENDIX • Abbreviations & Acronyms 6-1 • TIP Adopting Resolution 6-2 ABBREVIATIONS AND ACRONYMS The following list defines the abbreviated words or acronyms used in the City of Renton's Six-Year Transportation Improvement Plan. ACP Asphalt Concrete Pavement ADA American Disability Act AIP Arterial Improvement Program (administered by TIB) BAT Business Access Transit BNSF Burlington Northern Sante Fe BRAC Bridge Replacement Advisory Committee CBD Central Business District CIP Capital Improvement Program CMAQ Congestion Mitigation and Air Quality CTED Community, Trade and Economic Development CTR Commute Trip Reduction(State Act) DOE Department of Ecology EB Eastbound ECL East City Limits EDA Economic Development Administration EIS Environmental Impact Study ER Emergency Relief FAS Federal Aid Secondary Program v.r� FAUS Federal Aid Urban System FHWA Federal Highway Administration FTA Federal Transit Administration GIS Geographic Information System GMA Growth Management Act HCT High Capacity Transit HES Federal Aid Hazard Elimination and Safety Program HOV High Occupancy Vehicles I/C Interchange ISTEA Intermodal Surface Transportation Efficiency Act(Federal Highway Bill) ITS Intelligent Transportation System NHS Intelligent Vehicle Highway Systems LF Linear Feet LID Local Improvement District LOS Level of Service METRO Municipality of Metropolitan Seattle MOU Memorandum of Understanding MUTCD Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices NCL North City Limits NB Northbound PMS Pavement Management System A+ , . 4 ,t Precon Preconstruction Engineering/Administration(design phase of project) PS&E Plans, Specifications, and Estimates sift., ROW Right-of-way RTA Regional Transit Authority RTID Regional Transportation Investment District RUSH Renton Urban Shuttle SB Southbound SC&DI Surveillance Control and Driver Information SCATBd South County Area Transportation Board SCL South City Limits SMA Structural Matrix Asphalt SOV Single Occupant Vehicle ST Sound Transit ST 2 Sound Transit 2 STP Surface Transportation Program TDM Transportation Demand Management Program TEA-21 Transportation Efficiency Act TIA Transportation Improvement Account(previous TIB program) TIB Transportation Improvement Board TIP Transportation Improvement Plan TOD Transit Oriented Development TPA Transportation Partnership Act TPP Transportation Partnership Program(administered by TIB) Nompe UATA Urban Arterial Trust Account(previous TIB program) UPRR Union Pacific Railroad UPS Uninterruptible Power Supple VHS Vehicle Highway System VMS Vehicle Master System WB Westbound WCL West City Limits WSBIS Washington State Bridge Inventory System WSDOT Washington State Department of Transportation H:1Division.s\TRANSPOR.TATTLANNING\Sharon\TIPs\ACRONYMS.DOC s CITY OF RENTON COUNCIL AGENDA BILL AI#: /, 6 , Lie Submitting Data: For Agenda of: Dept/Div/Board.. PBPW/Utility Systems August 7, 2006 Staff Contact Ron Straka, x7248 Agenda Status Allen Quynn, x7247 Consent X Subject: Public Hearing.. Springbrook Creek Wetland Mitigation Bank Site—Lot Correspondence.. Line Adjustment Map Ordinance Resolution Old Business Exhibits: New Business Issue Paper Study Sessions Lot Line Adjustment Map Information Recommended Action: Approvals: Council Concur Legal Dept Finance Dept Other Fiscal Impact: kiwiExpenditure Required... N/A Transfer/Amend lent Amount Budgeted N/A Revenue Generated Total Project Budget N/A City Share Tota.Project SUMMARY OF ACTION: The City and the Washington State Department of Transportation are working together to establish the Springbrook Creek Wetland and Habitat Mitigation Bank (Bank) on approximately 130 acres of City-owned land in the Renton Green River Valley area. The properties contain easements and restrictions that, if exercised, would result in disturbance to the Bank and conflict with its purpose. The agencies that approve the Bank are requiring that all unnecessary easements and restrictions contained within the Bank be released and new easements be recorded for existing City-owned utilities where no easements currently exist. Because of the large number of easements and restrictions that encumber the Bank, some of which will be released and others will remain, and the fact that several Bank sites contain lots that are no longer needed, it is recommended that a lot line adjustment be recorded to simplify the process and provide a single source of information related to the Bank. The lot line adjustment includes a land rights map that identifies all existing easements and restrictions on the properties; a lot line adjustment map that will show the removal of unnecessary lot lines that were recorded as part of the plat; and the release 04 unneeded easements and restrictions. Releasing the easements dedicated to the City via the lot line adjustment map requires Council approval. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Approve and authorize the Mayor and City Clerk to sign the Springbrook Creek Wetland and Habitat Mitigation Bank Lot Line Adjustment Map, which will consolidate the existing lots and release LI unnecessary easements encumbering the Mitigation Bank. C:\Documents and Settings\mpetersen\Local Settings\Temp\Lot Line Agnbill.doc\AQtp Gti(Y 0e PLANNING/BUILDING/;; , PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT • NT�� MEMORANDUM DATE: July 28, 2006 TO: Randy Corman, Council President Members of the Renton City Council VIA: - Kathy Keolker, Mayors. FROM: A./` Gregg ZimmermanA&ministrator STAFF CONTACT: Ron Straka, Surface Water Utility Supervisor(ext. 7248) Allen Quynn, Surface Water Utility Engineer(ext. 7247) SUBJECT: Springbrook Creek Wetland and Habitat Mitigation Bank Lot Line Adjustment ISSUE: Should the City Council authorize the Mayor to sign the Springbrook Creek Wetland and Habitat Mitigation Bank Lot Line Adjustment Map? RECOMMENDATION: Approve and authorize the Mayor to sign the Springbrook Creek Wetland and Habitat Mitigation Bank Lot Line Adjustment Map. BACKGROUND: The City and the Washington State Department of Transportation(WSDOT) are working together to establish the Springbrook Creek Wetland and Habitat Mitigation Bank (Bank) on 130 acres of City-owned property located in the Renton valley, west of SR-167 and south of I-405. The properties contain easements and other restrictions that encumber the land, preventing its use as a mitigation bank. The agencies that have the authority to approve the Bank have required that any credit-generating areas of the bank must be free and clear of all encumbrances. This requires that all unnecessary easements and restrictions be removed. The purpose of the Lot Line Adjustment Map is to consolidate existing lots on the Bank units and remove any unnecessary easements. All existing lots and/or parcels that make up the Bank units will be consolidated such that each unit will be condensed into a separate discontinuous tract of land. The Bank units contain lots and/or easements and other restrictions that are not needed or represent unnecessary encumbrances. These easements are either dedicated to the City, or others such as Puget Sound Energy or the le„, City of Seattle. Those easements dedicated to the City that do not contain public Council/Lot Line Adjust July 27.2006 Page 2 of 2 infrastructure will be released with the lot line adjustment. For those easements dedicated to others where no facility currently exists in the easement nor will exist in the future, the City is requesting that the easement holders release their interests. The Lot Line Adjustment Map will also be referenced in the legal description for the Conservation Easement and will define the boundaries of the Bank. The Conservation Easement is a requirement of the approving agencies to ensure that the Bank sites can never be modified in a way that could conflict with the designated purpose of the Bank. CONCLUSION: Staff recommends the Council authorize the Mayor and City Clerk to sign the Springbrook Creek Wetland and Habitat Mitigation Bank Lot Line Adjustment Map. Attachment cc: Lys Hornsby. Utility Systems Division Director H:\File Sys\SWP-Surface Water Projects\SWP-27-Surface Water Projects(C1P)\27-3170 Springbrook Creek Wetland and Habitat Bank\1500 Easements\Land Rights\Lot Line Adjustment\Lot Line issue paper.doc\AQtp Is 9 u ISUU\JL rraue�uu a 1101=R1u 9 Uu U U UIP IniI IN Ii I-J)10 I1ULL1 INUUvULSLL;i l SPR HC b G OOa CHEEK Mn7C 7'LaRriL i HADD lik o 04CAQT N17000 r ©a BaRqK PORTION OF LAND RECORDING a LND-30-____ GOVT LOT 2 51V 1/4 NW 1/4),5.30,7.23 N.,R.5 E.,W.M. GOVT LOT 9(NE 1/4 NE 1/4),5.25.1.23 N.,R.4 E.,W.M. SE 1/4 NE 1/4,5.25.7.23 N.,R4 E.,W.M. SW 1/4 NE 1/4,S.25,T.23 N., R.4 E.,W.M. NE 1/4 SE 1/4,525,1.23 N,R.4 E,W.M. SE 1/4 SE 1/4, 5.25,1.23 N..R4 E.,W.M. NW 1/4 SE 1/4,S.25,1.23 N.,R.4 E.,W.M. GOVT LOT 6 NE 1/4 SW 1/4),5.25,T 23 N,R.4 E.W M. DECLARATION GOVT LOT 11 (NE 1/4 NW 1/4),5.25,1.23 N.,R.4 E.,W M. SE 1/4 NW 1/4,525,T.23 N.,R.4 E.,W.M. NE 1/4 NW 1/4, 5.36,123 Al., R4 E,W.M KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS THAT THE UNDERSIGNED OWNER(S)OF THE LAPURD HEIN RSUANTTETO RCSWR58ED11700040HAND DECALAREATHS ADIUSTMENTTLOT LINE TONBETHER THEEOF PURPOSE OF LOT LINE ADJUSTMENT GRAPHIC REPRESENTATION OF THE SAME.AND THAT SAID ADJUSTMENT IS MADE WITH THE FREE CONSENT AND IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE DESIRES OF THE AGGREGATION OF LOTS AND PARCELS INTO CONTIGUOUS UNITS FOR WETLAND MITIGATION MANAGEMENT OWNER(S)IN WITNESS WHEREOF I HAVE SET MY HAND AND SEAL SURVEYORS STATEMENT KATHY KEOLKER,MAYOR THE BOUNDARY SURVEY INFORMATION SHOWN ON THIS LOT LINE ADJUSTMENT WAS OBTAINED FROM A RECORD Of SURVEY PREPARED BY _REG NO.__AT THE REQUEST OF WSDOT, RECORDED AT AUDITORS FILE NO 2006 KING COUNTY RECORDS. REFERENCES TO FOUND MEASUREMENTS AND MONUMENTS ARE BASED UPON THAT RECORD OF SURVEY. DIVING TOPOGRAPHIC AND UTILITY FEATURES WERE SURVEYED BY THIS SURVEYOR DURING 2005 AND THIS ACKNOWLEDGMENTS LOT UNE ADJUSTMENT WAS COMPILED AT THE REQUEST OF WSDOT AND THE CITY Of RENTON DURING THE MONTHS OF JUNE AND JULY 2006 STATE OF WASHINGTON COUNTY OF KING 55 BASIS OF BEARING WASHINGTON COORDINATE SYSTEM NORTH ZONE NAD83/9I ON THIS DAY OF_ ,20____,BEFORE ME PERSONALLY APPEARED KATHY KEOLKER TO ME KNOWN TO BE THE MAYOR OF THE CITY OF RENTON THAT EXECUTED THE WITHIN AND FOREGOING INSTRUMENT. M��E�TTHT,IO�D�S� AND ACKNOWLEDGED SAID INSTRUMENT TO BE THE FREE AND VOLUNTARY ACT J¢W1YIIa2 AND DEED OF SAID CITY,FOR THE USES AND PURPOSES THEREIN MENTIONED. AND ON OATH STATED THAT SHE WAS AUTHORIZED TO EXECUTE SAID INSTRUMENT USED HUITT ZOLIARS SURVEY AND THAT THE SEAL AFFIXED IS THE CORPORATE SEAL OF SAID CITY IN WITNESS WHEREOF I HAVE HEREUNTO SET MY HAND AND AFFIXED MY OFFICIAL SEAL THE DAY AND YEAR FIRST ABOVE WRITTEN LEGAL DESCRIPTIONS SEE SHEET 2 FOR LEGAL DESCRIPTIONS OF THE EXTERIOR UNIT BOUNDARIES NOTARY PUBLIC IN AND FOR THE STATE OF WASHINGTON RESIDING AT COMMISSION EXPIRES_ - PRINTED NAMEU. O 11 KING COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF ASSESSMENTS CITY OF RENTON APPROVAL EXAMINED AND APPROVED THIS____DAY OF___ _ ,20_. CRY OF RENTON PUNNING/BULLDING/ 8 PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT S ASSESSOR EXAMINED AND APPROVED THIS DAY Of _,20_ Y DEPUTY ASSESSOR ADMINISTRATOR u, CITY OF RENTON LAND RECORD NUMBER q ACCOUNT NUMBER 8 li SURVEYOR'S CERTIFICATE RECORDING CERTIFICATE Date 07/21/06 `SECTION INDEX DATA: SHEET This map correctly represents o lot line adjustment ,PYS�G3, Auditor's File No '��� @I_ PROJECT o. O mode by me or under my direct supervision in q".:' /�,^Lg Aq 1p Filed for record by INCA ENGINEERS.INC. on Own By_ SPRINGBROOK CREEK WETLAND gconformance with the requirements of the Survey a thie___doy of ,20_ot NA CNH By RSC AND HABITAT MITIGATION BANK OF p Recording Act at the request of 03 I in Volume or Surveysat PageWCA ENGINEERS INC. 19 25 400 112th Avenue NE F.B. _ WASHINGTON STATE D.O.T. in JUNE&JULY 2006. ,9 ' records of County,Washington Suite 400 CLIENT ROBERT S.GLISTER s4"``N. Bellevue,WA 98004 File Nome WASHINGTON STATE D.O.T. ^ Certificate No 21673 Xnncs °X"/ Manager Superintendent of Records (425)635-1000 row-Sheet dwg CITY OF RENTON JOB NO. 05-0478 • .S) L E SN91 Until!'"HUN) , PAR c. inR •,,,, i 11:1.1.WR.7i I 1„':A 'F A 4 LOl 7.1,ROCK),BUR08D10N xO11ORN NDUSIRIAL PARK RENrO1 It.ACCORDING TO NE OAT THEREOF RECORDED W VOLUME III OF PUTS PAGES 42 11HROUG1 44,WpUSN KING COUNTY,WASHINGTON, LAND REFERRED 10 IN MI5 COUMIMENT N SITUATED W ME STATE Of WASHINGTON.AND DESCRIBED S FOLLOWS INC06 THAT MBER I Of 501 LOT 7 COMTED TO 010 CBT OF REM FOR ROAD PURPOSES BY DEED RECORDED UNDER RECORDING NUMBER 8.106090701 MO AS CORRECTED • PECCRONG NUMBER 80001,1,0.0501.1..01 J08050BS, R I,2,Y AND 8,BLOCK 6,BURLINGTON NORTHERN WDJSiR41 PSK RENTON 9,ACCORDING TO ME PUT THEREOF RECORDED IN LUNARE III Of PUTS,PAGES 42 THROWN N, N.LUSNE,IN KING COUNTY,VS4401011, TOGETHER wt.TO WEST HALF OF TO FORYEH 20 FOOT RAIIRON RICHT-OF-RAY AAIONING ON THE UST,S REUNOUYED LONER RECODNG NUMBER 8909110687 TOGETHER NM MAT PORTION DE THE FORMER 20 FOOT RN1/060 REM-OF-RAT,S DEUNFAICD ON SAID PUT 60100RNG SAO LOTS,S REURQUISHED UNDER#00062NG NU4BER POOR g. 8909110681 TWT PORTION O 1015 1 AND 6,BLOCK 7,PUT OF BUR.NGTON NORTHERN INDUSTRIAL PNM RM II,ACCORpRG TO ME PUT THEREOF RECORDED W VOLUME III OF PUTS,PAGES 42 THROUGH 11,NCLMME.IN KM COUNTY,WSHWGION,LYING NORM OF THE FOLIO/01G DESCRIBED UNE. UNI B&C.FROM PACIFIC NORTHWEST TIRE COMPANY ORDER NO 577123 BEGINNING AT 0 PONT ON THE EAST 081E O SAN LOT 1 WHICH IES NORTH M'47'31'EAST 173.52 FEET GR041710 SOUTHEAST CORNER THEREOF, THENCE NORM 88129'29'WEST PARALLEL 10 ME SOUTH UNE O SAID LOT I.A DISTANCE O 1.20425 FEET 10 IBE EAST LRNE OF 004070ALE MERLE SOI110E5T AND ME TERMINUS 1O UN REFERRED TO IN THIS CDLMIMENT IS STRIATED N THE 01AE OF WASHINGTON.AND DESCRIBED A5 FOL0185 OF SID DESCRIBED INE, F�E7,9 TOGETHER YITN MNHUF OF BURLINGTON NORTHERN MOO.REM-O-WAY ADJOINING YE DESCRIBED PORTON Of LOIS I AND 6.A5 WT-CUAEU UNDER 1ECORONG W1MBF1 6909110687; ALL MOSS PORDNS O 00`hPNMEM l01 I1,DE ME SOUTWE51 BARRIER O MF xOWMLSI OU4R1ER ANO MF$W1HFS1 DEARER of ME IIDRTYSST WARIER Of SECTION 25, EXCEPT TRAY PORTION O SAE LO1 6,BLOCK 7,CONVEYED TO Ht.MY O REMON FOR STREET PURPOSES BY DEED RECORDED UNDER RECORDING 678)867 8X16090701 AND S TCP 23 NORM,RANGE 1 EAST,96IAMETIE 9E601414,IN KING COUNTY,WASHINGTON,DESCRIED AS FOLLOWS CORRECTED BY BECOMING NUMBER 8308050566,1N54 60081880610006007771060704001 005ER7100 LOT 10 W SAD SECTION ATA PONT 25538 FEET SOUTHERLY.S MEASURED KONG SAID UST UK.FROM 170E SOUTH LK O 14-50 KNpYN S LP t,CNN O RENTON SHORT PUT NO SINN-115-69 RECORDED AIDER RECORDING 18480`11032090D6) HENRY LEADER 00181706 ISD CUM NO 46, MINCE WESTERLY ON A STRAIGHT IRNE TO A PONT ON THE FASIERLY UNE OF THE NORTHERN P0068 BWLWAT C04PM17 RIGHT-Of-WAY AT A PONT 28912 FEET SOLDIERLY,S THENCE MEASUREDALONG TSAID EASTERLY 61 W 0180 FROM PP X16 w8014 Of 60 FEET EAST TION 01 wD EASTE10641 0765 ND THE TRUE POEN Or NORTHERN RAILWAY 004PMNY 6NM-0F-MY AT A PONT 1,700 UNI D.FROM PACIFIC NORTHWEST TITLE COMPANY ORDER N0.577124 FEET NORM O TO GSI-WEST GEHRRUNE O SAE SECTION; HENCE SOUTH,KONG YID PARALLEL ult.10 A PORN ON THE SONH LEE O A TRACT WNETED TO BROADAC6E5.INC BY DEED RECORDED UNDER RECORDING WIRER 15 0 4 0103,3. TO LAND RITTERRED 10 N MS COAMTY)1 IS SITUATED N THE STATE Or WA58NG10H,ANO DESCRIBED AS MUM' SLD PONT BENG 5456 FEET NORM Or SAID CAST-WEST CENTERLINE, THENCE EAST,KONG SAO SWIM UNE TO THE EAST UNE OF THE SOUTHWEST WIRIER O ME NORTHEAST OUMRR O SAID SECTION ATA POINT 5456 FCO NORM OE SAID ESI-WEST THAT PORTION O THE NORTHEAST MAUER OF THE NORTHWEST QUAKER OF SECTION M.TOWNSHIP 23 NORM,RANGE 4 EAST,WEIAMETTE MERMAN,N KING COUNTY,WASHINGTON, GENTER001 176 EASTERLY O THE NORTHERN FAME RAUDID REAM-O-WAY MHO LYING WEST O ME FOLLOWING 0ESCRBE2 041 104010 SOUR TH,KONG SLD GST UNE TO THEN 0200 I CORNER O LONGACRES PARKWAY S DEUNFATED ON ME FACE OF BURLINGTON NORTHERN INDUSTRIAL PARK RENTON 8, R VOLUME ACCORDING 10 THE FIAT TNEREOf RECORDED II O PUT,,PAGES 41 TM106.N.INCLUSM,IN KING COUNTY,WSNNGTON, BEGINNING AT ME NORTHEAST CORNER DE FORT ADM.DONATION LAND CLAM. MINCE SOUTH 8751'79 WEST 1,624 W RV MORE OR LESS.TO ME INTERSECTIEN O THE NORTIERLI EYTENS1N OF THE EASTERLY UNL OTO PROPOSED P-1 CHANNEL S swowN THENCE FAST NANO TIE 01110 6O O SWM 100TH STREET(EORIERLY8001 COAD),114 FEET, Co THE ABOVE REFERENCED PUT,SMB LINE BEING 20 00 REEF MORE OR LESS,WEST O tO 11010 0 PONTORNER OF LOT 5 BLOCK 9 Of SAID PUT, THENCE NORTH 30 FELT TO ME NORTH IHR DE MgVESND STREET AND RE TRUE PONT OF BECOMING, THENCE SWTHERUY,ALONG SAD EX507417N,TO A POM WHICO BEARS SWM 882929 EAST FROM A IBENG 4E45URE0 KONG THE EASTERLY UNE O SAID WALRON RWB-O-WAY THENCE NORM 64478 FEET, AHD 2,018M FEET NORTH OF THE SWM LME Of 540 SECTION, THENCE NORTHERLY ON A STOIC.TING PMWIEL TO THE EST IRE OF SVD NORTHERN PACIFIC Mom COWMAN RIGHT-DE-WAY,TO OE NORM ZINE O YID SECTION 36 MD THE OGEMER WIDE ALL THOSE PCRTONS OF GOYERN4EN1 LOT 9 AND O 1HE SWM6. 01WeTER 01 ME NORTHEAST 40INn1R Of SECTOR 01,1080X501 21 606TH,NAME 4 LA, MIN.OF SAD AME' G0 05 ME SOUP JO FEET THEREOF; 680 w1uIAETE AEaDAN,IN Kwc COWED,wAS4Hcrox.DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS AND LJ1ttPT Hwa roRr70x DESCRIBED As FDuoWs BEGAN.Al A PONY 20 FEET WEST O ME EAST LINE OF GOVERMENT LOT 9 AN0 1,254.10 FCET SOUTH OF THE NORTH UNG BONNIE AT ME SOUTHEAST CORNER Of SUE NORTHEAST ONRIER Of THE NORTHWEST WENS; NONCE NORM 881448'WEST 1,02943 FEET 40RE OR LESS TO A POINT 300 FEET FAST O 114E WEST UNE O GOVERNMENT LOT 9, THENCE NORM 30 FEET, THENCE SORTIE 1'01'49'NEST ON A UNE PARALLEL 70 810 300 FEET FAST O DE WEST UXE OF GOERN4EM LOT 9 AND THE WEST UNE Of ME SOUTHEAST QUARTER O THE THENCE NEST PARALLEL WITH SMD 58470 UNE O SAID SWOMY06,TOA ROM 2095 FEET EASTERLY or EAST MOW-Ty-EN OF RAILROAD.AS MEASURED M ROB ANGLES TO SAID NORTHEAST OUARMT O SECTION 25,NM 23 FEET, 8D MAIN UNE TRACT CENIFRLNE IID ME TRUE PONT OF BEGINNING, THENCE SOUTH 88'21'18'X51 1032,55 FEET LORE OR HESS 10 A POM 20 FEET 0051 O THE EAST LINE O SAID SOUTHEAST WARIER 01 HNC NORTHEAST MARTEN THENCE NORTH PARALLEL NM SND 020 MRN UNC TRACT CENTERLINE A DISTANCE O 21340 FEET; LONGE NORTH 7719'10'EAST 845,19 FEET 10 RACE OE BEO8NNG, THENCE WESTERLY AS MEASURED AT RIGHT LADLES TO SVD OLD 4111.1 UNE TRACT CWIE%1NE.A DISTANCE 0E 20,95 FEET TO A POM DISTANT 50 FEET EAMON'.AS 0060446(0 AT EXCEPT THAT PORTION CONFIDED FOR SOUTHWEST 21TH STREET BY DEED RECORDED UNDER RECORDING NUMBER 8203150516. ROT MOLES TO SND OLD 468 UNE MKT CENRRWE, THENCE SOUTHERLY KONG A UNE 50 FEET EASTERLY S MEASURED AT REM ANGLES TO SAID OLD MNN ONE MKT CENTERLINE,TOA PONT 30 FEET NORM OF TIE SOUTH LINE OF TOGETHER WITH THE SOUTHEAST(EMU DE THE NORTHEAST WATER OF SECTION 25,TWERP 23 NORM RANGE 4 FAST.WILLWERE WRENN,N KING COWIN WASHINGTON, SMD WQUMSION, EKORT THE EAST 20 FEET THEREOF, THENCE EST TO THE PONT O BEGNONG AND WEPT AM PORION THEREOF LYING KIN N PC PUT O BLNLNGION NORTHERN INOUSTRW PMR RENTON E ACCORONG TO THE PUT THEREOF RECORDED N VOLUME III Of PUTS, NOES 42 THOUGH 11.WCWSM.W ENG COUNTY,WASHINGTON. AND INCEPT TBT PORTION ONG EASTERLY OF 14E FOLO'MNG DESCRIBED UNE UNI 1 FROM PACIFIC NORTHWEST 11111 COMPANY ORDER HO.577125 BEGRNWG ATA POM ON ME NORM LINE O MAO SOUTHEAST WARIER O THE NORTHEAST WALKER WHEN 6 JOU FEET EAST O THE NORTHWEST CORER. B1ENCE SWM 0701'49'WEST,ON A LINE PARALLEL TO AND 300 FEET UST OF ME WEST UO O SAID SOUTHEAST WARIER OP TOTE NORTHEAST QUARTER,10 11E NORTH UO O LOT THE LINO REFERRED TO W TINS C[NNIIYFM 5 SITUATED N ME SIDE OF WASHINGTON.ANO OESORDED S MUD.7,BLOCK 7,BURLINGTON NORTHERN 835STRML PNB(RENTON 9.ACCORDING 70 THE PUT THEREOF RECORDED IN VOLUME 111 O PLATS.PAGES 42 19001.61(44,MUSK.RI KING COMM,WSHWGTON.AND MEMums O SAN LINE; IND INCEPT ANY PORTION MEREO LING WM.ME FOLLOWING LOTS I,2 AND 9 BLOCK B,BURLINGTON NORTHERN RDUSfN4L PARK PENTON R ACCORDING 10 TO PUT THENCE RECORDED IN VTAUYE 111 OF PUTS,PILES 42 TH ROOOH 44. NCLUSME W KING COUNTY,WAHNGON; BEGINNING AT ME NORTH21'36'WE CORNER O SLID GOVERNMENT OF 9: TOGETHER WITH THAT PORTON O DE FORMER WARM RIGHT-OF-1101 AS DEUNGED ON 560 PUT ADMEN;SK1 0010,AS RELRNEISHED UNDER RCCORD80 NUMBER 8909110687; THENCE NORM 6721'38'WEST KONG lO NORM UO THERE A DISTANCE Of 2001 FEET TO THE WEST LOVE DE T 0 EAST ON FEET O SW GWERNYENT LOl 9. INCEPT TO NORTH 463.95 FEET DE SVD LOT 4 AS MEASURED KONG 111E WEST UNE MEREO, THENCE SOMI 049'41'WEST KONG SAD MI NNE A DISTANCE O 1,25420 RET 10 TO NORM UNE OE A TRACT Of WD CONEYED TO TO CRY O RENTON BY DEED RECORDED ALSO EXCEPT THE NORM 46395 FEET O SAO FORMER RATLADE RIGHT-Of-WAY AS MEASURED KONG THE EAS UNE THEREOF, UNDER KING COUNTY RECORD)0 NUYB67 7607250650. 6244 ALSO DEEM ME PORTEN DE SOD LOT 2 DESCRIBED IN DEED TO ME 071 OF RENTER RECORDED UNDER RCORDING NUMBER 8308090701 ASD CORRECTION THEREOF RECORDED THENCE ALONG TO NORM UNE O SAID DUCT O LAND NORTH 882417 WEST A DISTANCE 01 1,02232 FEET TOA LINE PALLID.WITH MIO 300 FEET EASTERLY O THE WEST LIE Or UNDER RECORDING NUMBER 8309050568: SAID CONOWOM LOT 9 MD ME TRUE PONT O MONO THENCE ALONG SVD PARALLEL LINE NORM X'01'49'051 A DISTANCE OF 45.6 FEET. (ALSO KNOWN S LOT I,LI11 O RENTON 40T UNE ADDSTOM NO LU-92-090,RECORDED UNDER KING CONN RECORDING NUMBER 92061190031. TENGE NORM 66'241171 NEST AE O 304.0I FEET TO THE WEST UNE O 5ND CODNYEM LOT 9, THENCE ALONG TE WEST UNE O 7110 NE SOUTHEAST WWRER O THE NORTHEAST WARIER OF SVD SECTION 25. SOUTH 1'07'49'WEST A DISTANCE OF 90.00 RET, THENCE SWM 89'2110'UST A DISTANCE Of 70001 FEET TO A LEN PARALLEL 67TH MND 300 FEET EASTERLY O ME WEST LINE Of ME SOITEAST OWNER DE TIE NORTHEAST OUSTER O SAID SECTION 15, r. THENCE KONG SMD PARALLEL LNORM 01'07'49'EAST A DISTANCE OF 45 FEET 10 PONT O BEGINNING 3 PARCEL B ALL 14mT PORTON Of SECTION 25.TOWNSHIP 23 NORM,RANGE 1 EAST.691A4ETE 904004,IN KNG COUNTY.WASHINGTON.LYING WESTERLY AND NORTHERLY OF ME PUT O E BURLINGTON NORTHERN NOUSIRBU PASK RENNIN R ACCORDNG TO TIE PUT THEREOF RECORDED N vOtU4E 1I1 eF PLATS,PAGES 42 1NOI100 03,NCLUSNE.N KNG 0009rtY. W006WG1014,ALL BENG MORE P101)018841 DESCRDED S FOLLOWS i BEGINNING AT THE NOLTWCST COINER O LOT 5 N BLOCK 9 O SAD PUT 01 BURLINGTON N0R1O84 41W5T9AL PARK REM NO W THENCE NORTH 883251'WEST KONG THE NORM UNE DE YE PUT.A 051ANC[O 2000 HET TO ES INTERSECTION WITH TO EASTERLY UNE O PROPOSED P-1 CHANNEL, iTHENCE NORTH 070711'GST ALONG ME EAST UNE O SAD CHANNEL PROJECTED NORIMERLY A DISTANCE OF 156000 FEET,MORE OR LESS,TO ITS INTERSECTION WITH A UNE 547 BEARS NORTH 675739'WEST TROY THE MOST NOTN4ESRRY COTNER OF LONGAC ES PARKWAY,AS DEDICATED N THE RAT Of BURLINGTON NORTHERN*60USTR9L PSK RENT.8.5440 4 PONT BEING ON TO REST GINE O COOIRWI061 LOT 9 N THE NCEMEAST COMER Of SIN SECTION 25, THENCE SOUTH 8757'39'EAST,A DISTANCE OF 1,62400 FUT.MORE OR LESS,TO TS INTERSECTION NTH TO NOR1IW'ESTERLY CORNER aF OEREM-01-WAY,SAEPOM ALSO BENG 4 014 11E WEST UNC OF SND GOEINME 7 LOT 9, THENCE SOUTH 01'30'37'WEST ALONG ME 8ESTRLY ute M SAO 0001-BF-WAY,A 850)000 DE 1.57012 RET TO ITS NTER9ECIION NTH 101 NORM UO Of BLOCK 9 O 1810 PLAT 3: 104001ED EASTERLY.SAID ROM ALSO BEING THE SOUTHEAST CORKER Of ME NORTHWEST QUARTER O ME SOUTHEAST WIRER O SED SECTION 25, THENCE NINTH 874427 WEST ALONG SAD NORM LEE,A DISTANCE Of 1,34799 FEET, MENGE NORM 88'52'51'WEST KONG THE NORTH IRE 0f SMD 810CK 9,A DISTANCE O 27579 FEET TO THE IRK POM OF BE24NNG, SEXCEPT TNT PORTON THEREOF CONVEYED TO BUTUNGT00 N0RBERN RNIA080 HOLDINGS,NC,BY DEED RECORDED ODER REC0710NG NUMBER 8911170955 8 ' SECAON INDEX DATA RECORDING CERTIFICATE Date 07/21/06 SHEET j 0.S 5 EL • Auditor's File No. ,��� y PROJECT o z 9 �''N.�^ ()led for record by INCA ENGINEERS.INC on Own JTN SPRINGBROOK CREEK WETLAND g n this_day of 20_at_____Li.M Chk.By RSC AND HABITAT MITIGATION BANK OF y; n volume of Surve at Po INCA ENGINEERS INC. 19 b g` t67J X 967 400 112th Avenue NE F.B. V. ,f,''' records of County,Washington Suite 400 CLIENT: '''NY41 44145` Bellevue,WA.98004 File Name WASHINGTON STATE D.O.T. s 9y11/ Manager SNperXntendent of Records (425)635-1000 raw-aheet.d79 CITY OF RENTON JOB 700. 05-0418 I _ SW 27T11 STREET: • SHEET 8&16 SHEET 6&14 SHEET&�12 I 500 250 0 500 1000 1 _a SCALE IN FEET - • l� feSFHENTS SHEET 7&15 SHEET 5&13 ✓- ® ME of EASEMENT,GRANTOR.GRANTEE.AuDrroliS FILE M e A(K/) SHEET 9&17 .... Ot 0 TOFF A/7901240690(PPLATS018U oucTER 0 PR PARK CO. - -- .. .,AAAA AAAA IND q �__.. `- O 20'u1Nw EeO(01 10 40 PARI(CO,Car C RF0451 Y PUBLIC IIR11I16. I� K/1901240990(PUT Q B11RlYWId1 NOR 1x0 PK RENrON tl) IIIA V Mar EASEMENT,GUCER Pat CO.CITY OF MON k PL911C UIWIIES. 1I!I IM K/19072/0590(PIAT OF BUR1w611N NOR PN PK 0051001 MI — Q 20'PEDESTRIAN ACCESS EA5EYFN1,GLACIER MK CO.CRIT OF RENTON, _ K/7907240990(PUT OF BUFM0ION NOR IND PK RENTON 1) Q 10'OTUTY USEMENT.0ACIER PMR co.CITY 01 REIF.. SSW 34TH STREET K/910320905.6PM 6(CAGES R SHORT PLAT) t _ __._____. © 20'PET/ESTI.ACCESS EASEMENT.GUCER PARK CO.CITY OF RENTON. r _.—�--_� K/910.5208006(PACER MP SHORT RAT) Ol 20'WATERLINE 4 PEDF51544 ACCESS EASEMENT.GUM PARK CO. ... .. AAAA CITY Cl REN10N.K/9103209006(GLACIER PARK SHORT PU>) 11 ...� I Q 10'SEW'El EAFMEM.CITY Of REMOTA MUNICNNR1 01 METROPOII1M MIRE, ' I KE 9255262 - I \ O9 UnLM EASEMENT,CM OF RENTON,cm OF WON.K/8110550502 \> T1s'NEMER USEYEM.10040<R PAPA CO.CITY'FOE RRMON,::...861210220‘67: /6112020464 : , . /1/..,;,:' / I11 10'001111 ESMENE.0.10ERPIPo(CO..GIY W RE51O4.K/62000900351, 1�210'15005 1110210(15<0fASFMFNI.BUil1N0190N 0190.55 0.WAW0----------_` SHEET 119 PROPERTIES INC,PUGET SOUND ROVER R LIDS CO,K/8552+030 11 _I • /i / • I ® MUtt EASEMENT.CM OF RENTON,PUGET SOUND ENRO7.KI 200009280021199 • 11) mum FOR waRov PURPOSES,arr OF�/ wwONC1OM 5041 A D WM FE RV9140 CO.REM., 20050303000964 /,,���SMI 311TH STREET; 7,,,,_,_7 fl I RESERVATION$ _ - LI RESERVATION CONTA5ED ON oUa coo DEED(<0!1603250650)FROM GLACIER PAI, ENMITY TO CITY 6 RE2r011 STARK SUBJECT r0 RESERRA104 TO GRANTOR 01 • MI COM,0A.EAS,E:ASNNRYKD GAS A ATL ORES A MINERAS OF EEM'00 o p A NATURE UCEROIN0 NE SURFACE OF THE PREMISES,TOGETHER MTH THE ML RIGHT.PRMEGE A 13CEN5E AT KN A 011 TRIES TO E5111.0RE OR DRILL Me A TO PROTECT,CONSERVE,MINE,TME:.REMOVE A MOO ANY A NI WO/ PR0WC15 IN 5D'0WR 411(0 TER N 151 MOT WAGEWAGEOR DISTURB STRUCTURES AND .. :SHEET 10&18. OTIUP00514FN15 APW GI1OR To RESTORE THE MENSES To SUBSTANTIALLY THE SWE CONOTI044 METING 9011041(01 PRIOR TO MY SUCH EIDLOATION OR 0121NN0' Y I - PROTECTT E COVENANT ❑2 PROEC15E COVENANT BUNTED NT GUAR PMK CO1PAM'TO TN0 Poem FOR NONE 050EELOED STATE I -SET FORM ON 0100ER PARK SNORT PUT(AFI 9103201006) et i T IBOIN STREET –— RESTRICTIONS RESIRICIIOIS CONDOM)W Om OPER DEED(KT BE USED FOR FANY GENDERPURPOSE PARKMO DOE 4.90 TO CITY a RENTON 00 ❑3 I) 101E 4011 OPEN S PROPERTY WY NOT BE USED FOI Axr PURPOSE TINT 006 NO 9095155 SUCH PRNTEE 41 WET SPAM Q 2) GRANTEE 5011 NOT COMP ME R ANIZTIONS ED PpOPERry TO IR,PERSON OR[MaY IXCE1R FOR MUNICIPAL OR NOT-FOR-PROM ORGANIZATIONS NOTE 195IINDM16 FOR RESERVATIONS.PROTCTNE COENMI k RESINETIONS ARE 5010 ONES RECORDING CERTIFICATE Date 07/21/06 SECTION INDEX DATA: SHEET F U Auditor's File No. Dwn B JT1'I PROJECT. J 0 1 5 c ,�CA y . JJA 0 11hee///�MMM���s���,,, c Filed for record by INCA ENGINEERS.INC. on SPRINGBROOK CREEK WETLAND g this_doy of ,20_ot M Chk.B11 RSC AND HABITAT MITIGATION BANK OF n volume of sure of Ra INCA ENGINEERS INC 19 § L IS' >s 9e 400 112th Avenue NE F.B records of County, Washington. Suite 400 CLIENT WASHINGTON STATE D.O.T. 11,AwG Bellevue,WA. 98004 File Name Manager Superintendent of Records (425)635-1000 row–sheet dog CITY OF RENTON JOB NO. 05-0418 i 10 •) .,.L•40(61 R-'000000 081135.]2. FOUND YON 64 CASECB-SB]'SSUI'E AT FRC,CENIERUME O 5'�„`w 1]00 J51__ 'POW YON W CASE AO INTERSECTIONINTERSECTIONPC t'EONt POWsMOD RCN IN CAg �_� YW CAg NhRUNET CENTERWE OF UND - - sT sw 2711127111si 589•42•5rE SW 27THSTREET -Al' a SW 221N ST 100 So 0 100 200 'I _ - 5550]• _.-. .- „_.- TA L i .=11 �•,., :r,OUND, �oY2'SYE', SCALE IN FEET t--*^�— - 45775.y5-� - .•;If: I. +I �� - i_L-87PAP ° I 0•]7288' R-55.00' I R-201•500- 08911011' ' -. 401.— LEGENQ A=lOI6.50 ] cW Nun]s2w co I CB-584792Y NW 800100R0 1 • ———— E051IIIG EASEMENTS S I �. '�, LOT 11NE5 W btbl� bp PARCEL LINES v� i '� •i' Pur TINES I I O Y --- 10111 Of WAY CENRRLNE -- = I ',!:/: � — - - - — SPNINGBROON CREEK = 8 1.. 7. Q .GRANTOR GRNRfE.AUOROR'S 101 Num.WE) q© �0 fit' I,. p 0111 OPR(01 CREEK GREENBELT&PEDESTRIAN EASEMENT,GVCER PARK CO, CITY OF RENTON,KI 7807240890(PUT Or BURLINGTON NOR ND W RENToN I) (�S� V ., O 00'MAT EASEMENT,0.20(0 PAWL CO,QTY O RENTOI a PUBLIC 6310170$. %�`-�//��Q ;, Art 1907040890(PUT OF 40011630701 NOR N0 PK RENTON 4) OW QI�o W° O] u1N1T r4u'NFn1GUM CM 0f RENTON A PIIOUC 001006. IF)7907240890(PUT OF BIRTYNGTON 1000 IND IN REN1DN R) 8 0( .��° (� — - --- ... a Q 0'6010106FAgYFM,041100 0001000.011 O 9041063,Af/6302080435E 1 O1 s� -04 %''��'°''' `_�y u 12 TO.1NOERGRGUNO 0.001000 EASEMENT,BIRUNGTON 406101 0 1010040 = (meq V' $r' I'D PROPE)1(0 NC,PUOE1 SOUND PowER A UDR CO.,AFI 006340522 - 3 n�•4" 'f B i V F. MATCHUNE —SEE SHEET 5 u S K rc s s 8 • SECTION INDEX DATA: i RECORDING CERTIFICATE Date 07/21/06 SHEET J 0.' S GJ, Auditor's File No INCA/ PROJECT (meq-.�) a: '°3,P; Filed for record by INCA ENGINEERS, INC. on Own Bye_ SPRINGBROOK CREEK WETLAND C ' i g this day of ,20_00 M Chk By RRC AND HABITAT MITIGATION BANK OF INCA ENGINEERS INC. UNIT A 1 9 g n Volume_ Cl Surveys of Page 400 112th Avenue NE F.B. C - �ITA, I ] sp1)' records of County, Washington Suite 400 CLIENT '2000 TAW Bellevue,WA 98004 File Name WASHINGTON STATE D.O.T. PIPES.gin/ Manager Superintendent of Records (425)635-1000 row-eheetdw,g CITY OF RENTON JOB 630. 05-041E1 MATCHUNE— SEE SHEEP 4 ,; ".f)I ..,h= MOWN.IN CASE Al 1i 4 4 -,LC) ., •«... ... ., ', 1- CENTERLINE Cf UNO ANF ..' a { ^�. ..... N ' ksw niNSt • 4 4. 100 50 0 100 200 A �® SCALE IN FEET 'I', ''4,1 ``� Q \� �pC�Q tit.11: , : LEGEND 1.11E) I 0- .% _d' ®� e Sig n ;I %.,0.1 0 i. J� 0 M UNIT B7AAMY �i�! f'SI # O O e 0' ',3I 2 120511K EASWEIRS N LOT UIES I i _ m® 440'7.– PARCEL IMES ly ` IE@J`y7 �M�U •1 `JI RAT 0 1E5 7 T i.: ' P 0.460.21' 73.0.5• L.86.39' -----�.-- ROD 00 MAY 00470608E S'I" .1. 0.1600' _w.3000• RS5.00' •"' 6.IUL6'12' /^`\ M5J/6'I2' 3.900000 Q C8.373303411 CB.161'31'26'E _ CO..03313 E 11 xFCwHear - _ ... __ " –•-- .-..."..,...«..---71.1---- -------7'. .--r• ' L �---. .{� —x867A•41•w----7' cr33999933 ,`A M"�• ������xT}� I Yi!—„_-- –25000_._ is SW 30TH..,nEE .FASEM 03 Illy .! {.',rt......., Q TOT Of EASETIFIR.GRANTOR,CRAM.x100003 foo TIMM(KI) ,-+` ----,•� - 32.T' _ 1 CRY OF ROOKROOK, 11,0x CW100NBEU k PLAT OF B LINGT N COZIER4040PMN CO. $ CRY Or RENiON,KI]901210690(PIAT 6 BURLINGTON x011 YID PN RENTON X) •«• N Q 20'court LASEYEM,GLACIER PMN CO..CID OF ROM(tr PU611C URIRIES, I KI 7901240890(PIAT Co BURLINGTON NOR No PK REMOY II) O3 MAID EASEMENT GIAC00 PMN CO.,CRY OF RUTIN 6%AUC 0110170, I K/1907240990(PIAL Of 01/101141014 NOR 610 PN R01T011 9) .. (CI 20 ROFS@A.4/CCM TAKSIER,%AMR MK CO.,001Y OF Rem, I K/1901340890(PUT Or BUg01010N NOR X10 PK RENTON 9) 11 IG OOUTY 00401041,WAW PARR CO.,CITY OF RORK KI 6202060/35 e 1© 10 LINDERGROLINO ELECTRIC 02509ENI,BURUN21001 NORRIERN 019062 RIMMED WC,PUCET 201.910 POKER 0 LGM CO.K/0306240522 7. ii Y 51 g S I1 S 3 B J RECORDING CERTIFICATE Dote 07/21/06 SEC00N INDEX DATA: SHEET X01 s CU Auditor's File No Dwn.By JiNIOW z • 3:k.....P; Filed for record by INCA ENGINEERS,INC. on ,NCA PROJECT' SPRINGBROOK CREEK WETLAND 8 this_aay of 20_at 6A. Chk.By Ru AND HABITAT MITIGATION BANK OF ii R n Volume of Surveys at Rage INCA ENGINEERS INC. UNIT A a Volume400 112th Avenue NE F.B. 19 --e„. 4, records of County.Washington. suite 400 CLIENT: WASHINGTON STATE D.O.T. C aY0A 29x6° Bellevue,WA.98004 File Name JOB NO. P9 .9/11.. Manager Superintendent of Records (425)635-1000 row–sheet.d4yg CITY OF RENTON 05-0418 .) 212'- I ' FOUND YON.W GISE Ai t, cNITERIPNE a oNasovE AVE d ::.I 1212911. N T.S 7.009 0.000.00 6.711'20' Cf.Nena' _ ir FOUND YON H CASE CENTERLINE 100 s�0 loo 200 ,.. • - - _ — N`Bzs'10'W r _ OF sr 276.(i 6.i� sm•IS Arw 0500 ,b'..• - HALLOS' - \N"T°Fmj"D"Cr247M*379:CM00" 2' SCALE IN FEET x� SW 27TH SfREEIr___ 1III - , -_ - - - i Nep)(i0'w TI1SSr W•-. 1 ._. ;.�,..�} ..I., .µ2s ---� -.>:�-,�. - '•:_-- .. a0 s+H^' ai. _ {07111.60 .: a rs.slisgrd RW6MAA xce-swzs•aris ARw'�; o-x'zr LEGEND = I I -'V-,,;,n'• --- I1._., cs-NBA]s5010 I p Nj , � .-- E%ISMIG EISEYENIS I • ._ - jJ I',. —. EDT ONES = 1 % "I PARCEL LINES = k i fI�� b PLAT WES I H -- NWIa 00 007 COMMUNE I yil [ tt •I yl x x x x _ 57101000000 CREEK I i j �RESERIAIOI❑1 x, I; . nuemw E AVT SA EIMMSION P1t SE 1e d 2 (iN r. I°j x x x x x wEELMA ABIC.1110N,TOTAL ARU.179 ACRES I —_——-------, C) _—_—-- \�N B I7j.,F . ,C . . - , _ I,# -. -. __....._____-_:.-..,.4,!'. 1,�1, ---""-" _ 1-52Ir it'''''.- J __V J 0.5955.00' x'i�?C, �— ry• 4s• t9•sO1ts•M71e. 5700010 h,'r;,�k I •'• f�$EhtEC� ` �t '� , '—,(1';I,;III ® Tr1E 0 G5EYENT.0RN0OR.GRYIIEF,NAMIOrS FML NUNBER IAF) ;--•-,A4. o 'I g; - I'i'i i ��'1i 5601500E 500 iI,x•i(;,+ ' 111 - © .YI 626FASU0NT CITY Of RFIR91,M9KYNfIY A YOPOP91TN1 SFA + ^, III( I,1 .� x IIS 0 UDLIIY EASEYUNT,CITY OF RENTON,Ml,OF RENTOR AO 61710050502 L'.2 MOM uO N Ii 1.482.115', I I 0 5E AT POINT1P4Cr 0.6000.00' x/a.x W(E$UEE AVE AY 01 i r WISESECOO ® 6.N1y11' x',^ ,1 x�l\1E15110N PHASE IBRF I ';ill,! Y. 0000 0041 0`04 CB.SWSI'S6'E y 1.,I{„4I lY r''`i.T"..' V ! E HI .]67Q _ 1,"{xA'N' 1 I�ss6aaa' ('Pso 0: '.:,s RESFRVATIONS e-S9tl¢'N6•E , x l' _ 1,, 0 0RESDNAIT00 CMJTANED ON WR CLOY DEED OF(1603250650)FROM cumPIR( MATCHUNE - SEE SHEET 7 o coo.TD COY OF PENTON SIAM',ABJECT 70 RE550001 1 TO GRAMMN OF ALL COIL OE.GAS.00110190400 GAS MA All ORES 0ND NKERK5 OF ESEAY RNID ono HATuRE THE CF INE PRE ,TccEINFR van INE RAI. RIM.P1NR0CE NAD 0KEN0E ATAAMEAND ALL 11045 00000E 00 MU.FOR AID TO PROTECT,000011.NNE.WE,600004 AND Mae INF AND ML SUCH PROWCIS W AMY MANNER*NCH MILL NOT WAGE OR 041009 004(1URES MID OMW 5100010105.MA 0004100 TO RESTORE THE P0EMSES To 51BSTANMLLr THE SM10 COMMON EUSTIN0 001404111.0 PRIOR TO ANT SIKH 0PLORAIBN OR 7PoUM,G.' 11 NOM 000000¢45 FOR RSERYATpNS P001(11AE O WEN.A 00510010705 ARE 5910 ONES. RECORDING CERTIFICATE Dote 07/21/08 SECTION RED1x DATA: SHEET O,Q.t 1s CGs Auditor'sfor Filrecord No INCA. Dwn Bye- \6 v6otcr; g �: P Filed for record by INCA ENGINEERS,INC. on SPRINGBROOK CREEK WETLAND this_doy of ,20_al M INCA ENGINEERS INC Chk.By RSC AND HABITATMITIGATIONBANK OF g 14, I In Volume of Surveys at Page 400 112th Avenue NE F.B. (1 9) J. ,r records of County, Washington Suite 400 OUCH, '''.611L 0 R'AYAL m Bellevue.WA 98004 File Nome WASHINGTON STATE D.O.T.6(9 a/n/ JOB NO. CITY OF PENTON Manager Superintendent of Records (425)635-7000 row-sheet.dwg 05-13418 A N I .'' MATCHUNE — SEE SHEET 6 t a1a6 $ " I '$ /—REAFM310/1❑1 16 ,0,1 0"9R 6000.0,--'2-... ..,. ' . I I I y I% ,M x 5ae7s'1DE wog�1� 6.11)1'7/• IN756'b^N BOJ' I my • 100 50 100 900 C9.S079T162 NO758'3011 903' —�T- x--+— I F,I L.196 IN' -- "0 Lq SCALE IN FEET tl 2.606000 $ J 'l I V 05]1)716' ��t�0� L `� 00956.3Yw RCS. 'I' CB.N01]I'S7•W I \� V ' � •-z� 11 ' 1.163 93' .i'"+ l', ;,y°9 ��0`,L0 1)N I i:i L. oo. I (10.1402111111 n�j Q xl' I N', y( R•512.51. i �7 ®�W(n WMECIM DAWN( 0 1'.� 1� T (1y�"'f( k•r6zs1• t E_ o9/ ,®�I®°t WI De-xoznra'w • ' - - sn1'J6 �� q`�r�v �yCr s .w it 1rJ ' 1 Ce•14.23.17'E ix f ''a'i Pyj® its:_�u� lE9EdQ �3A k' ' i�M I by ,� ,a t N 2 CD ,�y� x -� i "'"" N` �U x I x .- E%iphTWN RINSE 1E14 II' t WIR 110191D. FaTWGVSEMENIS ai drt„.Y ` JO �Cr�SIA° 'x �x , fkg? t'. . — . ,. LOTUSES . /PGL®: •%. �, .Ti `. I`x:, Pur IMES PARCD.DIES s'"YR Sr777, 9n a CASE AW ep���l®b• b R 1 I % T. y • a f, I - RIGHT OF 90 CENRRtxE l ¢, �ry ._ �' L 1 4 y 1:. x x x x 6ViSDAE rxuc R ExavoR Rwu 16 k 7 ''',(41 '' i a I .,o e000n k..r—_ �— ._X t -rJISr M f}, • .31 40, 1oU '7F' • i( '211..9f?._. x x x x x y WETLAND IAMCATION.TOTAL MIFA.2.79 ACRES :,-�\`` !',J:� 9CAP 01/W.OF .. ... 10 Y 7QI.IT • ,Aamm s ', _. .^..., -PPM MBAR k W `_ PROPERTY CORNER • CT' I F AT PREMIX CORNER' I I` 9 I;y ' g � fIA'� FOMN W CASE AT f9 FEE5 CTIRFRII!E OF OANESONE W' 1 L.S 11 9 © TYPE Cc EASEMENT,CRAMCR,GRAWEF,AUCUORY TAE WIDER(KI) ' MATCHUNE -SEE SHEET 9 £ Oi SPRNO&'OK CAEET(GREENBELT k PEDESTRIAN EASEMENT,MACIER 7000 CO. CRY Of 6(01014,AFf 19077/0690(Pur OF 951NCJ011 NOR W PK WON II . ® NI1wlz105607(�%AT (004460'NORM 7000*a''D NJ` RESERVATIONS PROTECTNE COVENANT g 0 UnUrr EASENENr,GLACIER PARK CO..Cm M 10776 k PUBIC URURES. NI 79O174CI690 OUT O'BERRNLTCW NOR WO PK RENTON 19 Q RESONATION COMMRD ON OUR CINE pay((K 1603750650)Mu CLAW PAM O PRORCWE CWDIWT OP.YRm 9Y OIAGLER PIAT(O.WPAm TO THE PUBLIC TOR WIRE U9DRELOPED WE f COMPANY 10 Cm a OSOICI STAW16''9KMEC0 RESERNAY'N t0 GRANTOR Of -SET FORTH ON GLACIER PARK SNORT PIAT(KI 9103209006) {j+ OS 10'UTLITT EAYIE0,0 ODDER PARR CO,Ott Or RESTON, ALL COAL,OE CAS,05114E.M0 GAS A'A11 ORES AND.ERAES OF E1ERY MID KI 9103709006(OACER PARK SNRT PUT) AAD MAME U106214NO THE SURFACE 07 Inc Kama%Vane,win THE Nil r�ccTas e.nr� © 20'PEOEAWW ACCESS r1snEJR,ODDER PAM CO,OR a 1I1R011 11,06 To MORE cri Cuitu FOR 7b mart,InimL6GT IND LICENSE AT iAf[°RE�YAE M10 1MONET AW' AL 91CN RESTRICT ON$ IMIIKI 91o3zoW06 ODDER PARE SNOT PUT) PRODUCTS w ANY IMNIER*SDI DLL 401 DANCE OR MOAB STRNNRES 0D 0 70'WAEAUNE k PF➢ESIRIW ACCESS FAsurait Tiara PIAN CO. ODER 1101.098PCIR6,ANO OUMOR To RESTORE 11E PREMISES TO SUBSTANTIALLY 0.' REsiR))CM16 CONTAINED IN CUR CININ DEED(K 9706941806).09 GU=PNM NUPMB TO CRT OF MEM Cm 01'ROION,KI 91Nzo9006 PACER PARK0140 SHORT PIAT) SINE CONDITION DOTING WIYEDNIFLT PRIOR TO MN SUCH Flb'IDPAI'x OR pRllNlr.• 0 2) THE MOW CRIM SIWI�IIO�W PROPERTY WE WAblNOD4E 30USED 6900 PROPEAta RTY T+pogrom R WOR 00701 OCt91 FFf10 IOWOP�AY OAR WIN NOT-FOR-PROFIT O 740001pN5. O PREY ZMW0a,an'OF RBRON,"'MI SON'EUEr*"KI 70000979007099 _i PIM Bp.YTEPR16 FOR RtSERNMNS,PROIFCTA4 CNENWi k RESTRICTIONS ARE CO'UNFS 2^$A ♦ RECORDING CERTIFICATE Dote 07/21/06 SECTION INDEX DATA: SHEET 2.1 ?� S' C J'r Auditors FNe No Dwn.B zii_ ,2Q. �` Fled for record byINCA ENGINEERS,INC. INCA Y PR0,051 g ,2 �j. '✓v p on SPRINGBROOK CREEK WETLAND `>! thla_.day or ,2o_at M. Chk.By RSC AND HABITAT MITIGATION BANK OF n In Volume or surveys of Pogo INCA ENGINEERS INC. UNIT B �Y S 3 1 ge _ 400 112th Avenue NE F.B. �9 �0, Y records of County,Washington. Suite 400 CLIENT: WASHINGTON STATE D.O.T. RYII 4.,.'," 7449 Bellevue.WA.98004 File Nome JOB 200. VIRE.:0/ROA ♦ Monoger. Superintendent of Records (425)635-1000 row-sheet.dwg CITY OF RENTON OS-0418 I) ) • A!i)rI It � 100200 6�p 11 SCALE IN FEET LEGEND UNIT BOUNDARY —--—— COSMO 005000405 10 LOT LINES FGA.)MBAR Al MCA LINES ANO CM 06's 11JJ k 0.(E OF PUT INES PROPERTY CORNER RIGH OE WAY CENTERLINE VI N - - - — SPRXCBROON CREEK I X•MIND STEEL POST ON PROPERTY UNE LU (1) MPE or EASE1160.GRANTOR.06M10.AUOTOR'S EXE RUBBER 1M/) O NORTHERN 410 WR1 cif PURPOSES, CO KY 20030]00086/BURLINGTON $ F RS Si BOOK LONGACRCS B.S.P. (MY 20040106000164) ? I 4 E `... - LOT 3] TRACT F J YC-`'''.. 'X'Or E( IBX' 1110.6000 Nue 00 - 6% ]62 P.!, E Or CALC CORNEA _ __- __ _ - _ _- _ $4F.>je SS•EJZ�tt7 1 $Fly- -F/10.CNCY(WUYFOII �' - (GsroRetD)D.e'N a ?,,,r_., wr 3 �CC, j .�I 'CAC.COPWP ._ \` w - ._ 1 MATCHUNE— SEE SHEET 9 a SECTION INDEX DATA: SHEET RECORDING CERTIFICATE Date 07/21/08 a R1 5. Ce, Audltor'B File No '��� ( +B. y pPOJECT: B rc: f'q.p' Fded for record by INCA ENGINEERS, INC. on Own.B�Qy_ SPRINGBROOK CREEK WETLAND tnis__day of 20_0t_______114 Chk.ByRSC AND HABITAT MITIGATION BANK OF y� in Volume of Surveys at Ra INCA ENGINEERS INC. UNIT C Or 6 tF ys Page 400 112th Avenue NE FB 19 FT.OR.oL L s,)f6" records of County.Washington. Bellevue,e 400 WA.98004 File Nome CLIENT. WASHINGTON STATE D.O.T. CITY OF RENTON JOB NO. Manoger Superintendent of Records (425)635-1000 row-eheetdwg 05-0418 MATCHUNE — SEE SHEET 8 • I 51 WO 200 '"i m- 'r^:, • „ . . *,*Z4.,"Tbri,g,,`y'7 % 41 1'_'y `yl hff23?sNw' SCALE IN FEET N LEGEND 'l' F ear Wean COSMO MUMS - , - W ... • ROT WES VT PNYYL MED - t I —— RAT 1080 I i ROM OF Wr COBPAK p —_ _ ._ sPRNCBROdt GREEN CR r N�� o u MATCHUNE— SEE SHEET 7 i ii• t• 'F.,' 'b P f t i t • s Iii •S Yc RESTRICTIONS F "� "�T� F... I 080050341MST I D3 IRFrr�Otl A 41 00000ttDW,GN07 XC fi0241 0010:f iN OlOES IZTTO CV PROPIX10 As 00000 SPK{ c� 3))1 CR0110 SWl NOT CONEY TIC OBO+i-DESCRIBPD RORFIY TO MT PERSON OR 0000E=PT FOR NIACIN.CR NOM-FOO-00005 00000 450415. NOTE.0010800005 FOR RE5ENAION5,PROTECTIVE CO.EWN1 0 R15IRCION5 ARE Sg40 INES y SECTION WOES DATA: SHEET P t s c RECORDING CERTIFICATE '��� Dote 07/21/06 a Auditor's FAX No Owne ,ITN 00040000 B ,R204...,„ Filed Mor record ny INCA ENGINEERS.INC. on y SPRINGBROOK CREEK WETLAND 9 Ohie_day of ,20_ot M Chk.By RIC AND HABITAT MITIGATION BANK OF Volume of Serve of PageINCA ENGINEERS INC. UNIT C 7 !' inYs 400 112th Avenue NE F B. 9 Srecords of County.Wosh ington Suite 400 0110000 we AAw0 Bellevue, WA. 98004 File Name WASHINGTON STATE D.O.T. 08 000. �1°�RfS'0/00/ Monoger Superintendent of Records (425)635-1000 row—sheet.dwg CITY OF RENTON 05-0418 ) / ) .,,lk • POUND MM IN CASE Al CENTERLINE OE Sw 13R0 Si 1 n is ICL Bt�'SF Rf� ,p E 1 i 1 I 1 1 N N r • 1 1 w217em'w + + + + + 502170'01.1 + +210�' + + 1'S9'F + + +~# + +I 1089.67' 1-49 i + + + '2095' + + + + # ++I \ +........,., + # + - +++ +,++ +. EY6RND SEWER ENE NO PASEIaNI iE :.`.,\, G./, �+ + 1 +'•,..,.+ 50'RaDwAr FASOrPPr . £` + +1 + + -. + - + + + + + O (Irl w1n3s) is ts MONUMENT NOT MID. A, 6 ©+ _ ,� CALCULATED NE CORNER C: + -�.N',+ T.." + # + vN� LOANS ac MO As q � d. + t ++ + t _ +++ + + + CENTERLINE CP SW 43RD sr :L►'���ppp A G+ * '+ . ' + + +- + 4. ,+ + + * ' eV...,a 4 " 1* + -- • _ ./., _ -•M. -"\-"\--\"\.62461' •• ._ pRPM'If•[�A.. FOUND Ra CAP 5 016'W*a 00 005'S CP' E Y PROPERTY CORNS D1 3— x30, _ _ . Ry11,: 77 • POUND UN IN CASE AT 404100141E K 500 4380 51 a MEDAL AN EASEMENTS 150E Of EASEMENT,GRANTOR CRANIEE.Aum0R'S FRE NUM000(APf) J— ,,,,...,‘„,\„,,,,s, ^ ECYDN'AY FASEYEM MELTS M EASIERGLACIERY 60 FEET,CPRIX CO.SIFRNOfP E1 IL AiI 60]]135 �'�- - _.,""VVI^ 0 0 0 0 0❑D C It0A4WAY fASEYENT AfiECR SOUTHERLY PORTION OF NAM 1UCIFR PAPE 00.,CITY OF RENTON,LT/0110010300 0 o o o o 0 0 100 50 0 100 200 o I F—=J 1Z;J ` SCALE IN FEET / // / IRE FOR WEl1AND BUffFR ANA GNG,CITY OF RENTON,iEIWH RENTON TIL.,Ac/9905200166 �F. (21,310 SOFT IN Se CORNER I0TAIIY CONTAJNED 001WN An 20030203000121) M i r`•END \ \\ UDINIE5 EASES/WEDM W 13 OMM RENTON,0F YRA A MANSE unite N we CRY OF RENTON,AEI 20030203000125 \\ \ tart Navin, ——--— FAI71IN4 FASEMM10 d 6 d 6 6 9 LOT UNLS d 6 d 6 6 STORY DRARUCE POND EASEMENT.CRY OF RENTON.an OF NEMA KI 2003020X100126 5 MOD.111E5 -- PUT Ural r ' T - S ---- ROWROW OE NAT CENTERLINE + + + WEDA110 MTwa 10 KA FASE4m ENE C 01 RENTON.CIII OF lolowA 1Ff 20030203000127 I —. - - _ - SPR108001R 0W S RECORDING CERTIFICATE Dote 07/21/00 SE41100 INDEX DATA: SHEET Pt S.n��9 Auditor's Fele No I C / 0yam— PROJECT \10-) a m. Feed for record by INCA ENGINEERS,INC. an Dwn a SPRINGBROOK CREEK WETLAND B thie_doy of .20_ot_'/ NCA ENGINEERS INC. Chk.ByRSC AND HABITATMITIGATIONBANK OF /1„:„ 2161In Volume records of of Surveys at Page_ County,Washington. u 400 112th Avenue NE Suite 400 F B. CLIENT: 9 "0044 45.01oBellevue,WA. 98004 Elle Name WASHINGTON STATE D.O.T. PIKES 3/Il/ CITY OF RENTON JOB NO. Manager Superintendent of Records (425)635-1000 row-eheet.dwg 05-0416 tt.IIV Y.IN AS,NN & OF OAAESDAIE 4047 4f SIT 140 SI 440829'50'40 .- J r�'^ `•\ / Aay T, �D M.F. MOND REBN AND :-- - ....-I-._- . .._:-- _ C0701 ')'' I I; '- - 820.1]' _" "_ _.. j... mm /. .2' , I' //, `� . 1� 50 1 200 I I. ,-.. / ,y... ` �` SCALE IN FEET 't-- 0) L i / ;/z'� LEGEND oe CI § __1 J; ---- COSTING EASEMENS ��Ir"INT 9211110.00 I ��P .; . . 101 UNE5 4 I �y+ �a O ONES (� I PARG ° / / PUT MSf$I ct O* 09 1,O / 4 / SPRMCBROpt LRfpc 000 A 'f/ / . / itallea -1-,',z ® 73PE Of EASEREM.GRW10i GW0EE,APRONS ERE NAM(Ar!) I F I - //.t'' / f / o v10F 0044 CREM GREENBELT a PEDES1NW1 FASE4044 GLACIER PAW CO. - / .d! CRT Dr PENTON.N!7007240000(PIAT OF DIBUWTON MME RID RN RENTON 0) ' IA O ZM U14RY WNW,WPM PAB(CO.MT OF PENTON 4 NEW VBDES. it I An 7007240040(PLAT OF BURUNC10N NOR 0P PK PENTON 0) I .� iii iii Q MINIM EASEMENT.GLACIER PARK 00..CM a REM%•PUMFC 0 NGS. / AF!0007240800(PLAT OF BURUNCIO4 NOR BD PR R011ON 0) :1,1'1, 410 / y!S , IO AE SEWER WPM.GLACIER 0401 CO.GD OF 001100.AF!011202004 I 1 f / 1/ , Q 10'040414'40SEJWTT,DOM PAM CO.0444 OF RENTON,AF!020205005 �I\\ ./ 12 W.MPEncROIRro FIECIBC EISFIWIIT,BURLINGTON xDRDErcI gNIAOAD •I \ J/ry;<�: , RESI•RIG710N� _ PpppERRE$NC..KW SaRP PaAFR 4 UDNT ro.N!0]062/0571 - I', \ rN. / rY / t-1 '\ 7� ❑ RE501CTONS CONTAWIEO M OUT CLUB DEED(AW!020624006)4400 C,ALBT RAW 0044204110 CRY 0<RENEON: o 1" II \ ';x�r' s 1 THE ADM 047404 D PROPPED'NAT 110T BE USED 7Gf NO PURPOSE 1NAT DDE N01 00404444 4041 PROPERTY AS OP01 SPACE: ,/ GDNRE 40.00 NOT 12014/EV 144E 0007-0DESCRIBED PROPERTY m Am MON OR PMNT EXCEPT 100*UNCWl OR NOT-FOR-PRORT ORCANGA1041S / P44 NOTE BOUNDFAIES FOR RESERVAD3NS,PROIECR2 arNVM 0 R6Tl1C1R415 ME STIP TINES 0'v / r�1L y. '8 ao i %'--- .. s s FOND 4009 N CASE AT CENIEAUIE Q 00(ESOAE AVE S a 400 MON 11/CASE AT CE/DEMME OF DAHESDALE 'b' AVE 4 SW 41ST ST 5ECTI0N INDEX DATA: SHEET RECORDING CERTIFICATE Dote 07/21/06 P U Auditor's File No own B 4500.00' 0 s 0� T5 s INCA Y�1g P Filed for record by INCA ENGINEERS.INC. on SPRINGBROOK CREEK WETLAND chk.e RSL: AND HABITAT MITIGATION BANK OF oi this_day of 20_at_�. Y volume of surveys of Ra INCA ENGINEERS INC. UNIT E .0 4, inPage 400 112th Avenue NE F.B. C-1 9.) . s `Mgt" records of County.Washington. Suite 400 CLIENT. .'F ''O4+E,...o BMlevue,WA.98004 File Name WASHINGTON STATE D.O.T. PwEz:9/1>� CITY OF RENTON JOB NO. Manager Superintendent of Records (425)635-1000 row-eheet.dwg 05-041B ) ,) • EASEMENT RELEASED O 711E OF EASEMENT,CRk11OR.0R4.1EE.e2200e'S OLE NUMBER(tip -) 0 SPRNGBR001(GRED GREENBELT 4 PED6IRLW 0ASEMENT.WAW PN01 CO, CITY or WNW.IF/79072/0690(PLAT 01 1<011)00001<040190 PN W..10 6 O f 79072 NAT OFER MIX WM*01051 004.0%.0F 09 om P0<1024*.,0)5erx WILMB. O 1790)2•(AA PBURUNOTON NOR 00 /EMON I) ""' I© 10'UN11 EASEMENT.01A001 PARK CO..CRY OF WNW.sq 620201X35 EASEMENT ABANDON@ O 0'635516EASEMEM.CRY OF RD11ON,W.MPPNM OF YE1RWtlILIX1 SEA111E. • ..a11 '61111 104 ..40 '1:1111 A ,,:s 1 12 IO UWERCRWN0 E0<5(1 0 050041.BU 1540101<NOMMRN WIUO10 PROPERIY3 INC..<8001 50410 POM 4 DWIF CO..AFl 65062/0522 FOU0 401 N CASE 100 50 0 100 200 AL PRC EERIERIINE Or SW 1)M ST FWINO TIM N CASE AT FOUND MON IN CASE 1��� FOUND MCN III CASE PWT Of NIERSE0100 AT AT CENTERLINE OF UID SCALE IN FEET W-CI Cf 5R i7M ST 6 SW 2]�IN STYE 27Th SV AVE a SN 2TIN ST _ .� 92.4257E 55503' C3 Ct _i W-U 1 E(LW * 1" a 569'1Y5TE 457.7( 7 5671257E,79.W' T_.I Se9Y357'E 223 97 U,�•� O B o Li I 50010QNURr }.I 3p,y9s C" 3 RESERVEDMPNOf RENTON UC U 4 La ———— EN97WC MENEM 4 - ------ PIA1 IWE9 �� e ----- POO OF NAY 0000/4.2c J INE DATA ' i I ZINE/ BEARING 0151 W ,s,CL-L1 567125 --" 7----4 EL-L2 S6r35721./ ,0319- Z g \ (� Li S00,7 03-w 500 K=.) \f„ _`\\ f w i� L2 50117031e 10.00' �' G ,``tel L3 5005 ire 2550 �` u V L4 5e711•Ir•E TO 00 .S z 8 CURVE8 fiDATAp0. � iH CWp�9(IRF� / W C I TA e 55 �E .Y6 �'e� /4 , 1 I; Ccx-, ,'3s'32• j.W��:�� J6s• 5spe7a'•$'2,1'E �Y /o ,g'o T2 Cl 91'18'1• )045 9Yb16 5772249'E "78b6' $ /<7 1Q/ i CA D2'30'0r '[20456.50 09.3, 979'22'47E 62331 f0' �/ a CA '67050.5' 00' 03145 '34703'520 5711 pp CS melt' 1000' 83.71 344.03 52-E 57.21' .6Y / ~ N )e . / 10 o BI ( ( U z t 1 ga 1 S MATCHUNE - SEE SHEET 13 K B 8 g SECTION INDEX DATA. SHEET RECORDING CERTIFICATE '��� Dote 07/21/06 r' " S 5 CUJ• Auditor' File No y PROJECT. *.'7k p Fued for record by INCA ENGINEERS.INC. on Own B JTN SPRINGBROOK CREEK WETLAND this—day of 20_00 M Chk.By ISO AND HABITAT MITIGATION BANK OF 2 n volume of Surve of Pa INCA ENGINEERS INC. UNIT A '@N, I g° 400 112th Avenue NE F.B 1 9 records of County.Washington. Suite 400 WENT.0'^+'+L L.No'g Bellevue,WA. 98004 File Name WASHINGTON STATE D.O.T. CITY OF RENTON JOB NO. Manager Superintendent of Records (425)635-1000 iaN-Bleat-ant 05-0418 FaSFM aR EKED I80 ® 158E M FAS0MNI,TAANIg1,GRANTEE,NAI10815 RIE NNW 941) loll.�,•� ® 005 OF#0015*I 190i240*00CREMES t(PlOT 8(AM08 •CLAM PARK NOR NOI0098806 1) (,.I ® K 074 Aim79065(RA7 OF 118 50 00T0N IpR RO#8*088011 9 182 ® UMFASTM011.0.AC0R PAN(CO..COY OF REAM t POI:MRM DETAIL S 41 7907240690(0101 OF 400.0 GT0I NOR 9A PK REKTOR 0) NTS ® 20'PIDESTRW1 ACCESS EASEMENT.WIA(EA PARA CO..an Of RERUN, AO 7907210690(PIAT Of BURUN080N NOR 1O PR RENTON 1) it 10 own EASENER.WARIER PARK CO.CRY CF RENTON,#T 8202080435 EASEMENT PORTION RELEASED/PORTION REMAINING © 1PRDPERIRS*6., ELECIRK EASEMENT,PNOEI SWIA PONFR t URIFTW..IFI1101/4 970624005 100 50 0 100 200 MATCHUNE — SEE SHEET 12 I I b SCALE IN FEET /, eI SFE DETAIL SJ 7 y'EOM NON W GSE AT y 0 691,291E OF INC ATE :t t SW 29RI ST 5. 4 LEGEND UNIT 80MCA00 AS Fs g EE^^ D =�I ———— MING EASENMIS I ♦`N J J v yy RWM 08 WAY C0NNOPE �1{y-1r�.,II1 `^/ t T ..— 5PR01CBROON CAEEN N (y p I$ AREAS ( 's i (50.FLl)RESII 70) Aker M 1171407 lv c E' MOWED FOR c117 INFRASIRIlC1URE- 4575 COSTING TASflIEM• 12377 .. `b RANI- (117415) I U RANK CREAT AREA. I I1N8 F' -il- J INF DATA LA 48054.475 782 23• 48824'479 908.57 $W 30TH STREET A... .o•y Q 9E1U' 28.46' I - Ti o 48612447 48854'4]59 ]600 0 7 SOr1513w SJ.00 • 7.9 5 6,_5(4717 ^ i 1y 10 00401 I3W 5373 A 111 041359 6930 I 116120 118e24,13]'5 S9.J1' - I B Y 181 Sot'7517w 48.00 IV 192 54424'477 5.00' 5 E 1 gA S SECTION INDEX DATA: SHEET 10.13:.:.., RECORDING CERTIFICATE '��� Date 07/21/00 J �Q, S j� Audit0I R Flle NO y PROJECT a♦ 'q a Filed for record by INCA ENGINEERS,INC. on Dwn B _ ow SPRINGBROOK CREEK WETLAND o this_day of ,20_at M Chk.By RSC AND HABITAT MITIGATION BANK OF n volume of sur Surveys at Ra e_ INCA ENGINEERS INC. UNIT A 9 `1461 I .g 1 9 400 112th Avenue NE F.B. ," records of County,Woshington Suite 400 CLIENT WASHINGTON STATE D.O.T. - 41 lr°° Bellevue,WA. 98004 File Name 01.18(8.°/15/ Monoger Superintendent of Records (425)635-1000 raw-sheet-oast CITY OF RENTON JOB N0. 05-0418 EASEMFNT RFI.2SFQ • _ ® 1ME Or WOOD..DIDMOD.GRNITCE.MORONS 81E NASD(NA) 0 alum FASDar,do of RDRa80 car OF RENTON NA el MOW EASEMENT ABANDONED X — O6 0'1EWED F 504011,CRY 0,80910X.NUPCNNm Or MDROlWIM SEATTLE. d' .LI4„�.' {L15 N2 6255262 J� r 116 I -- J Ill 'OWN WI N CASE AT DE(NL A PONT Gr DCW DETAIL 9 Of SW 21TI 1N ST ASS 9.1 S. 100 50 0 100 200 FUND NON M CASE AT FCW00 YON INCASE /0010080 OF OANE1011E ATE AT P T.00110111E SCALE IN FEET 5882001 119695' OF SW 2711 SL 50115'17w 1500' Is 0 SW 27TH STREET a-a•, - X8624'10'8 112551' N882T0' 4M 69225' C7 DID �SR OETM A UM X8824'11'8 30527' S 4 444 160' \-_ v. COSiNO WOW OFF ABWOONEO x I II SEE DETAIL 8 tj La LEGEND v=i I L4..3 I UNIT 8Ue0MY N x I �0 80500110 FOR CITY a RERR. 1 K g EE'''' I L—', 4'�.J Mgt: W 9 l: W ----— DOSING(8009115 2 - IRF x 2 & U 1051RC19A LINT - 1 x PUT uNCS 1 I 0z IISIi PIC#Al WAY LEAICR00E /-PESEMA1pN 17 /�AW'N Ip F'� 50111 6FG01[PRN 0�`AC V I x D r. JJNE DATA acr W I. x �pyylllI s 5691502'0 500' •''1r” I INET 8A1NG 0151 10.1 1 X Ia 011 LN 588'24 10"0 5200 I A IT - LI5 04024'501V 5.00 '' LII yNpp824'10'8 6697' x C I:- .E.' LII Se024101 4666 %I E' LI 0 z9 20.00' I% 7 t• 5 120 14575631'W 20.00' 121 '15207291 49.16' I x A U91E5SNE AVE SW a CDMA YON N CASE AT 1014 (9 ® x w1ERSECMN1 OF EliEM710N FALSE 1N a 000(50AIE AVE E x xl Tem�DI8F4 ACRES o I% x %I CURVE DATA's x 5 cuREA p 07 awus ENG N cNo10 a ARNw a oto DSTMATCHUNE - SEE SHEET 15 CL-C2 1018'2S 90999' 163.70 5831477 16348' RESERVATIONS CL-CI 0.13'14' 600000' -02.85' 4»0513857 ,44275• IS Cl 9020 36 J0AO 44.15' #4815327 39.72 0 RESp 411009 C0N1M0D ON 5090 CLAM ORS(Nj 7603250650)ERN 0'820 PNM COWAN(10 CRY OF PENTON STATING: C7 0 3625' 884.99 114.84' 584'36'001 III.6' SUB[C7 TO RESERVATION TO GP.NNOR or ILL CCW,OR.GIS,CASWCNEN GAS ANO AIL ORES IND WOWS OF EVEN MK CIO o21328' 596000 387.43 #31'0646'8 38736 IND INURE 0110011.11110 DIE SURFACE OF 160 REIMS,TOU:1111 WAN INE FULL ROW.PRMIER MD MCOISE Al 9M AND Cl/ 00]016' '5955.00' 52,42 HOMO 0 0 52.42 All RHES TO EXPLORE 0R M.FOR 990 TO PROIE'C6.CCIISEPIE•INC TAKE,REMOVE Aro 1VAI1E0 ANI MO AIL SUC11 PRODUCTS x x A A x IN WMT .1 (115 10*2 :4C1z x•1537' 86499 650) $6811.511 65.06' W ANY MN64pt INCHWLL MDT 0040E OR 015111R8 SIRVOARFS N0 0140 660894IENIS,110 01110810 RESTORE 110 x x x x xANO CI) 0'28'00' 4.99• '32.14' '5872115'0 22.11' PR S SES 10 5U654N IVIT 1NE SWE[ORATION 085581 IMMEDIATELY PRIOR 10 ND SUCK/000711101 0R UUYO.' CI4 01'4948' //d{99 27.63' 581'/'41 2262 CIO 901'36' 23 0330' 36.31' 50.2501 2267' 101[601NOME5 FOR 7)306A10N5,P01ECIr7 0O9F4UNf&82TRLT5815 INE SO.0116 Cal 070051' 1650 100 00020041 22606 51 i� S bi RECORDING CERTIFICATE Date 07/21/06 5007101 INDEX DATA: SHEET 5 INCA► ,.p1 RgUJ` Auditors File No. O'',2'' 4• own ey.9Qlf_ PROJECT. '�4. A p Filed for record by INCA ENGINEERS,INC. on SPRINGBROOK CREEK WETLAND o thls_doy of ,20_01 M Chk.By RSC AND HABITAT MITIGATION BANK OF In volume of Surveys at PO INCA ENGINEERS INC. UNIT B 9� 7 $' Ys 94 400 112th Avenue NE F8. 19 1" cords of County,Washington. Suite 400 CLIENT: rf'0yu TAO records Bellevue.WA.98004 File Name WASHINGTON STATE D.O.T. #onager Superintendent Al Records (425)635-1000 row-sheet 9999 CITY OF PENTON JOB N0. Fa 05-0418 Dy.4P3;17VanDN$ © TOPE Of EASEWEWI.MANOR,GR00TEE 02.0110('5 DIE NUMBER(Kt) IN 5PRWG 00041 CREEK GPEEMB.1 k PEOFSIRWI f/SE11EN1.0000'46 PIAT(CO. ,� [1 4:6E1NA1100[ONWNED ON 504 a I SEED(ut 76032SOBSO)ROW waR PIAN O� CDM'OF RENON,A'E 190R4aeW(RAT Of BD 1011100 HW NO DN RfMON Y) PETROL Q Noe.1 10 CITY(M 401101 STATOR'SUBJECT TO PTSDNAIOW 0401106 0f \`l 20'UTILITY EASENBO.41024E PARK CO,CDY CF RENTON k PUBLIC MMES. AMIE PONT NiS ILL�9,Op•015,GKNGXFM OAS NO ALL ORES AND TOMS OF EVERY KIND KE 790T31�9U(RAI a BUPoIW'ION NOR RD P5 WON E) AT ME 911(1&C1101 W IRE AND NATURE UNDEALIING TIE SURFACE 0f TE PXBOSES,TOGETHER VIII M FULL SW1N LINT a INE N.415 FEET W I I♦ 0x0 TO PROIWEtt COMMMMD UCENSE Ar ANY kV OLD DBES TO NE.TANS.40410(1 AHI WANE,COLORS NO 11 FOR SUCM O Kg 77907 O'1/33T GF 60431 BUBA1T01 N0q 40 60 6002080 Ute• WIT 0051 NORM OF30'1 Ci a IN ANT TuRNER Mai VR1 _ AND i EAST NAA N OF 5 C =r+rrrr� 51151'15'0 OTI[0 rsWRIMTYENfS.40 GRANTOR iO�RESTORE TIE PREWSfS TOS SBSNLWIWLY DIE OS 10'URDT fASEMFHI.SLAVER PARR CO,LIMY Of RENTON. rr1 •+� . 3,.: SAME COCOON COSMO xYFWMD.T PRIOR i0 ANY SUCH EXPLORATION OR DRUM.. Kt 910J309006 IGUN[RT PIAN(511061 PUT) AARE PpNi. �/� •,`.. •� �w/� © 30'PFDESIRIW Aa:E55 LT:,WMA PNet CO..CIIY OF RENTON, AT TN INTERSECTION W ITC salty 411 F"1';:�-';..�� PROTEC LIZ.L GOVEN#NT K/9103209006(OIJp01 PYM 9167 DAl) UW OF TIE NORM MS'W UNIT C 10'601101IW k PED6IPWN ILC65 EAAMOD.WAtlFT PAR(CO. WIN TK EAST LIMON OF W9T C .CO,•'....,S CDT a RFMa.NI 6031590/6 IWAWER PNN SIN7R1 RA1 Q IA01EC0NE CONIWW CRANED Br Guam PAR(COMPANY TO lW PUBLIC FOR X11 110610 DPED SPATE �(,N' Q .7....:..'-- SET POEM ON COVER PARK SNORT Pur(022 9101309W6) fASFMENT REIAAININC� 1 50 100 200 - -- D NMS E -- D NAi.IS N -�_.r_-- MATCHUNE - SEE SHEET 14 © MARY MENEM.GT Of RENTON,PUGET SOUND EWA N,Kt 4010921002000 I - T 50258.3(1 800.. ❑ z SCALE IN FEET i'40.0'11aD Nois8.30'w 80S 1 x 0 R[5DWAINN SEE WAR 0 ;V �N025B'30•W 803' x IOU t4 x 0 0I /// iivLLll[ , z MD BWNWRf N. , x x 60507.071 FDR CM a RENTON : ��\� „ z C' - UTI ES N RAS R N NAE /_ f L��.L�4.1,<ZN]d MG COUNTY SEWER EASEKM �_`\` 3 a I'"l SEF OETNL N z z z `r 1+.u LI /,-........„,m ---_- COMM(EASEMENTS •R x RESTRICTION WOr x x x ❑2 '-- ---_._ PUT UOS Ix _____ PONT Of WAY[MIFALIK _1±1 _ .� „ x z N �y PROMOS*CREFM In 1 .: W I 1-' ..)I" z 1 VI x x x xt OWFSDME AK SW N (��-,10 E(IQ40ON POSE Ma AREAS i �� `/ t;i.x 0 x x 41�T1' NDNT 6 I (S0 R.4) Z < N ( 214 x x x x O 500 Z 917 B• 1703017 = SEE DETAIL C� g s 1{' x x x x x�� U 41133(400 FOR CRY NiPAS'IPUCNRE= - 11856 1- 0 ,- . .\\ x N KUND IIT 1& ;31191 i O IWRASTllatIRE W WETLAND WT BAN-- -321 L z x z x x 00081 CREW MEM 15702191 MONO yNEp00 SEY56 W 7.1 xxxxxxx N BRACT C ABANDONED '" /'SEE OETurl 1 GRIL G 1.k / {..� x 2' z x x x x I SFE OM U L51_16,1I051/ { z x x x x I 410• 45.0•t . L19 t"`I- 141 NBB'J5351Y 006.56' �j, „ 1 I UNE DATA FOND MAR k \ •�'x x "L29x 1 us •• CID Q11'W.OF ` M88.30•25V»44.41 - 7 SEE DEM r 1\ -- 'E- r�,-ETN-� PROPERTY COOKER SEE 0 109 N- `SEF DETH I AT P�PGPf41Y OMA( RERAN k CAP Lit>_Fid1[fi.SM^�FiMMAID NON W CASE Al I Lk�I1L107kLi-'�E)09L''' WNIERUNE OF 04(ESALE ATE I la Ea'111MUIIu7La..a.M1QSill QEF �Y.Y>♦IEWAN x 0 0 0 x 1 I 7991-F RMi:Y i^� FUND 400 W ma Al ONRSdtE ASE SW 01443 P 1 NMSE IB k 2 . Y. E E'ilT.'t-O� � CENTRIW W OANESDALE ANE x z 0 x r - WIRD NDICATDN,T0R0.MFA.2.79 A AES �1'tria'.izi'�Q35 W wineurTGDY4i�Q:� i e31��PTLEI2"�Drx,R�7. P4M11•11011tal.1./11111 MATCHUNE - SEE SHEET 17 » 138 Ek'� _713"its y!1 u: T;'<' 1 132 L28 ®Ez451Rs•9Ln� UNE DATACURVE r'. Z L•+-1.1.':A Y:.1'�(fjA� DATA 1.14.1„11--.914.311 037 189 UM LSJ 115 111 a PAIMIEdYDY9W�Flgl� 016 �Lle �w131 momklig!'rY>�EI' t D�57 A •BMWs 1 ,,^I ,. .r'n D6i- _ l0F''F"lii.]FLt.^�FaZs� 150 ms,, 10.00' CL-C2 1 LB ZS" 908.98' id31i 5851'STE 163.13_ 015:. Iggillir g �Es`:A'1Pzi"1�tga� !SI IAI•.TI`2s"E 37.700 DIM E OFT&G DETNLJ MALI Rum. J.9.00i♦FliZo 154 S0tro1159 9.28 72 021430 '61314- 113,9- 57701.128 II 09 xis DOSE MTs. DF7ML H NIS. x7.6 E<15 E.dl57ti>i6E:e 1 133 $ 013 1536 110 71' 19 01'33'18• 601000' 12.27 90131's18 21.3?^- f ®F'�1G•'1(ci^�EL� 051 501'Jd'zs8 37.47 cls 0012'41" N)b.o0 2227' X011131^0 22.27- NTs V ®0.:17 'Y'�•' 11100-1♦ 1.62 58758,3'0 8.00 CIS 1130111• 95A0 187.39' 1'01178 158.0`- E[ii�Ey-,i.7tai^rItaI X63 Na 518 1z.er `s olroly4 BWOao 102 80 pr1eT pr�u�- RESTRICTIONS IS.�E^'SYC'1R�1>•�1� Ly1 501 1'018 21.08' C18 01.1251• 5980.00' 17$72' OTOCE Oft31' g I!L 1 0L012� LBS NSTN'21W 40.00 IESIPoC10N5 NNTAI1kp N cur cum DEED(/f/9ID6NI806)IRON WMYA IAB COYPNI0 TO CITY Of ROII14 JY M)•419:700 II11.� 166 N01.OIT(� II of �j I) TC NpYE DESCRIBED P60PFR1(RN NOT BE USED FOP 004 PUIPOSE 1(01 006 NOT~AIN SUCK PROPEE11 82 MEN PACE; E�''GT1_Y'=7FF]"�IQ'1F7'1� LS) s6T11 z7'E 130:00 2) GRANTEE SNNi NOT 109801000040-0(0040060001141000 PERSON OR BA10 EYCEPr FOE 431880910.OR NOT-FM-PROFIT WKI442A110401 3 S RECORDING CERTIFICATE Date 07/21106 5Ec11090 INDEX DATA SHEET 11 914 s Auditor's File No 5 ` INC/ yam_ PgOJECT rpINCA ENGINEERS,INC. on Dwn B SPRINGBROOK CREEK WETLAND rc. ,^ Filed for record by o tnle__doy of ,20_0t M Chk.By RSC AND HABITAT MITIGATION BANK OF SvN n volume of Surveys01 Pogo__ INCA ENGINEERS INC. UNIT B 19 R a AT 9 400 112th Avenue NE F.B. t. 4rO+'44 •' records of County, Washington Suite 400 WENT. TO00 BNlewe,WA.96004 File Name WASHINGTON STATE D.O.T. CITY OF RENTON JOB NO. NPS`°Y17y Manager Superintendent of Records (425)635-1000 row-sheel-Dost 05-041E1 EASEMENT REMAINING r ., 0 TOO or MUM,6RN900 GOWER.mows FILE 20IYRR PO).., a ESSEEIENr FDR 12x90223 P➢RPp5E5,aD OF RFN1cN. BUtUHGTON NpDKRN ANO yNTA R RKRAY CO.IFI 2005030300096a. 4. I O 100 50 0 100 200 L I= J t ;;;J SCALE IN FEET LEGEND 0791 90Ew0000 C : RESERVED FOR Of RENTON COY+- UO 005 Y8R S RU URC ANMD RE048 ——--— 555040 645E0ENR - AND CAP 06 5 N e 0.4'E Cf L01 UKS PROPERTY CORNER I+J W _____— PUT UNCS (./1 • 10N1 OF PAY CDNERIeE 1 X-FOUND STEEL POST ON PADPER11 INE Z = CD U d 3 T s - LINE DATA FE 80450 LONGACRE5 8.58 1N 5(08640 pyT WI 20040109000164) 435 2.410801E 3+98' a 136 504.0138E 38.48' .. L57 54TNa1N 52.6T 68 0500317E 53.90 139 "50108'018 5500 LOT 33 V 145 554205178 8084 MKT 2' 2.07090110 25.10 70 3101 D 368 25.58' 5 130' ,82. 1169.1 S sG B MATCHUNE - SEE SHEET 17 g eli P, SECTION WOES DATA, SHEET p RECORDING CERTIFICATE '��� Date 07/21/06 ,,,R,' 5. CO,... Auditor's File No % i'.:" TAuditor's Own By.Qy__ PROJECT: CIA) ^c p Filed for record by INCA ENGINEERS.INC. on SPRINGBROOK CREEK WETLAND thle_day of ,20_05 M Chk.8yR4C AND HABITAT MITIGATION BANK OF n volume or Surveysat Foe INCA ENGINEERS INC. UNIT C / ,�9 9 400 112th Avenue NE FB. \ �,t}2 records of County,Washington. Suite 400 COENT. 80742 6Aw9 Bellevue,WA.98004 File Name WASHINGTON STATE D.O.T. " P0.5/91/ CITY OF RENTON JOB NO. w0Manager Superintendent of Records (425)635-1000 row-sheet-Dost 05-0418 MATCHUNE — SEE SHEET 16 +00 50 +00 200 // SCALE IN FEET REMOTION❑J J ul LEGEND UNR BONOwa N VWNOFAMENTS ITTI HESIRILTIOM UAW 0. -- PIAT Urs BT - _ Roo OF wAY CENRAUE CC ABM $ 1 (50.f1.8) 1 CI MATCHUNE— SEE SHEET 15 —r - yY A g I S V 8 aS NBSZr29'w+88122' f ,I ✓i 3 RESTRICTION$ MIND p NON w CASE AT ctM1EAUE M OufESOAIf ❑ REMICIIONS COMWED N OUT Wag DEED(uf 92092411906)FROM Mom PARR mime To CITY OF RENTON. ADE a Se 34111AS S +) NE ABODE OESCRBE➢MIND WY NOT BE usED FOR ANY NAPO%SoT DOST NOT wNNTNN SUCH PROPERTY AS OPEN SPACE; ST 2I GRANTEE SWI NOT COMET 01E ABOrE-OESCRNED PROPIXtt To ANY Knew 0R EMT E%CEPT FOR MUNICIPAL OR Nor-FOR-PR=ORGDOZA DXs gNOTE 000XOWE5 roe RE5IR9ATION5.000100IM1E COMPr4 A RESIPoC+ION5 UAE 5010 INE5 RECORDING CERTIFICATE Dote 07/21/06 SECTION WIDEN DATA SHEET V. ,0.1 S. coAuditor's fde No '%1I PROECT S 413110 c?.. Filed tor record by INCA ENGINEERS,INC. on DwD,By,RN SPRINGBROOK CREEK WETLAND tnis_day of .2o_ot Id. Chk.By RSC AND HABITAT MITIGATION BANK OF volume of Surve of Pa NCA ENGINEERS INC. UNIT C "eeiibbTT33 m mn 9' 400 112th Avenue NE F.B. 9 records of County,Washington Suite 400 cUD,i �',WA Eco WASHINGTON STATE D.O.T. I Bellevue. WA. 98004 File Name JOB NO. Manager Superintendent of Records (425)635-1000 row-meet-ooB$ CITY OF RENTON 05-0418 k v FOUND YON N CASE AT + CENTERLINE OF SW I43190 ST ) 411111,- VP A t 1 1 i , l I 4 I t F RI1 1 + 1 1 i 1 1 iCL BNS t x6)51'39'8 2093' SEE DESK 0 f { 1 1 I 1 I I I I i F �1-�..., 0001801'E 21340 + 261 W 163 SI 1089.8* -v.u9 I v + + + + ./+ -/-#02',11°1 # + -,• NO2O8.01T 829..101 .1 ++ + 47+;/- +j +% + + + 1 + ++ + + *+ ++ + + -1 681NTN 721'Mar D I 4 /+ ++ #$ •-20' BANK CREAT MG 12 ++++++7,4 ++ ## ++++ +;+IS. �14 , I Fr s' 't NONNENT NOT FaMo. a+ + 1 + + + + ++ cuaurtD ITER lw p p + + + + + ++ +++++ �If 1'j Leg �` g ADAMS OLE NQS AS / + 02000346041010w 4380 S] p p+ + + + + + + + + + + + L94 � ' [��. _ .,. --F- . _�-f_t •44.65, 1 L90 �n ��L9] Y�•YI, + P "+ - —.-�� . 502D6'Ni'W 816.59,�__.-.--T, R \' SN'II'1]'W 82461' 4... 02116'N'W 660, SEE DEM N SEE OCTAL Y 048 k W 502W6'4I'W 68073 #80620 k 083 5 OF PROPERTY CORNEA 8S R •LL FOUND Nal N CASE AT CFNiFAUNE❑Sw 9Wp ST4_0 ‘...F....„., .g:;;�v 1; k OAKESOAIF Alf .•. S 3. _: , 1. i' Lea �a,J .�9 `. EASEMENTS REMAINING TYPE Of WNW,CRNrtOt GveATIEt.Aia)MpRY FEE NUYBER(K!) 111111M- IIM Ilims. _ DETAIL N BQds.A ,,,,,\,�,',�. Ra1DWAY EASEMENT 41EC11166:EASTERLY 80 FEET,6L.LL0R PARA CO,51ERNOFE El Al,AF!6073135 103 - I 5IL ARENK SCALE IN FEET 0 0 100 200 LINE DATA 0 0 O O O 0 O C 011 8111 20398 T MEM SaMIERLY PORTION Of PMrA GLACIER PI/a(CO.CM Qi RF1Da9 (50.FT.E) ❑O O O D O❑C K!8110070398 5 UNIT D. 4291811' It9eGl 07 41 T y J FGEND NORM 12r Cf UNR 2- 237951 L64 1 pOfS 507 'TINT 2005'- i RLS E IIY RARASTNDC116t- 13510 187 �r rn. 70 EEf�Rt tt *146131�]-^ 9 / / / AREA NA WEIVND WEN AYERA607.CII.(44 MENTON,4Ff 10 RENTON LLC.K!9905200386 E125ING fASE4OR- 57697 W N�84D13Y 8D' // / (21,370 SOFT.N SW CONNER TOTALLY CONWIED WaHN Kt 20930203000127) UNM BONDAn INFAAVM207 80 N DIMING EASEMENT. -1864 185 N18'4705546 38.78 V DANK CREDIT AREA- 171614 le8 NBB' ,1L5'W SY 1I'''''� D 1,7041 0 064 0860 OF RMai 187 18 2274 09 IU9 5021847 AI '110.3€' \`\\`\ YOURS FASEIENT,Ca Of RENTON,my OF NWwaA k FRAAY:NISE MUTES IN THE CRY OF RENTON, 1 ExiSTO€EASEAIEMS 1191 029:12T0'iiw Vii \ \\ \\ K!206M12/30Wizs 5 -- pLAT LaES L91 NO*0(5111 1065 Nae Cr WAY GENIERINE L94 502' '3118 6ST A p A A A CREEK 995 5133' 7`W 4 3 A A A A A Sou DRAINWE 1016 4160000.an oF HINTON,CITY OF 0 66A K!20031203000126 L97 S8W0 O6 5 197 N115/0'103/ BO,r . S'P1�_� 'BEY' + + + + 56TIANO FLAYING£8004041,7010 0,RENTON.CITE OF 1MYRA K!20030103000127 + + + + RECORDING CERTIFICATE .. SEDote 07/21/08 ��INDEX DATA. SHEET gy _,..9.A 5. CG Audltor'D Flle No '��� Dwn.By�QL9_ PROJECT. 1 8 AAy A Flled for record by INCA ENGINEERS,INC, on SPRINGBROOK CREEK WETLAND sF this day of 20—et M. Chk.By RSC AND HABITAT MITIGATION BANK OF In volume Or surveys of Poe INCA ENGINEERS INC. UNIT D +s� yT 9 400 112th Avenue NE F.B. 1 9 9„, P66' records of County.Washington. Suite 400 CLIENT. w4:ANw Bellevue,WA.90004 FIle Name WASHINGTON STATE D.O.T. Manager Superntendent of Records (425)635-1000 TOW-6h#Wt-poai CITY OF RENTON JOB N0. OS-0418 GENSERIwf Of 0A*ESOKE AVE A SW 34M SI i ir i .../-SEE OCTMo 45.21 59629'31'€550.56' I 56629'31'0 51051 R J -,.._,0.. iO4Y0 R®M AND CM / /. OSYSe0.11'(54 / 5675TW 57694' LALOJLAIED 105001 / 5075I'x: 521.91 DET15ALL D ,I SCE DETAIL 6 ' 100 50 0 100 20D SCALE IN FEET IR IR9 a, E 2- LEGEND B g •••• i pFran R ``` g _ .0 6(5101905 0 / WO 00,A10F61 I V / 1^ / ———— 601110 03049€0 5 Lam{ / / EASEMENT RFIFASif] RE5MIC06 5 LAIN a « '/ © bat O EASDIENI,MOIR GRANTEE 01,990)55 RLE 5001€0(KI) NAT ONES = y '4 OI 070 54ND 55(RCD(7 201241T 0(5145 PINI MOR500105,C000R PARK CO., R1GN7 OF'x791 CENIpILNE I n � / CRT Of RDRON,AO 7907240990(NAT Of NONIRON NCR ND N(RCMON 0 SPNNLBRWS CREEk - 5 / QS 20'014711 MORON,OKK0 PAR(CO.CRI OF RENTOR 9 PUBLIC URDIES, Alf 7907240690(NAT 0E 8746 5000 NOR 60 P5 MOON 1) _ 4' 4 ' Q MUTT(05EIENT,GLACIER 5544 CO.,Cm OF RENO/a 01.9179:UNTIES, AREAS ;.5' / AO 79072/0690(POT OF 82LINGTO0 NCR NO M REN10N I) (50 fl!) 0 1 / 0 15'SEWN EASEMENT.015005 PRIX CO,CITY OF 600066 KI 6112020460 IRO E. 667910 '010 MINT(0209051.OLKEN PK03 K CO.,CRT OF REN10N,KI 6202095 E915RNC SaN IO-5A1VSTRI(WR(- 6371 / Il WM OUST AREA- 5497811 69 N / LKERIZEBEHELQ / / 1© 10'IRODE1Rdw0 0(01)20(650051.5O6INO0N 565904 NAROO 580000II6 RNC.50001 SOOe 506055 a I1G11T CO,K/550 40522 / / I Ai; / 4� SNE DAT9 I \ a / 6051RICI0IIS 00NI4RD w 0191[IMI DEED(KI 920624186)Mu 01,tl4A P491 CDNRWY 0 CM OF REN1004 50 I i 1'4 / 213 1 0E MOLE MOWED PROPERTY 1455 NOT BE USED FOR AM PUA03E IRT 006 N0 UNNT011 RICH PROPf0IY AS OPEN SPACE ". 2) GNOME SNIT NOT COIMY RTC IBOVE-045[55621 MCNRIY 0 KI!PERSON OR EMT 0ICEPI ITN 9OICpµOR NOT-EOR-PROM ORG91QA7GN5. LWF g�Fj/NN�5�O r / 0.-14 NCI'Y7"01'C 10116' -.-� 0.-15 1104"0"E 732.56I I: / 7401E BOU50WE6 FOR RESERVATIONS,PROTECO.E 05455 0T It RESIRIC015 ARE SOLID LINES LT1 NO1'g017- 0565 ....,>::1-SEE / U2 sstr ig Si.90' pi ,�-YE DETAIL 0 L7 547 40.0' L 1 541'17 W 7674' 1' i4 / A Y i� .." ��SM1 / 4 7 uo 1 :OT C Ir Ve I d 15.21 ilk"SEE MAIL P ` EOM RCN R CASE T contR AE OI , DASESDKL 6.79 DUAL P DETAIL p P..- Il N.1 S 5.1.5 Fax NON R CASE At R100NIIRUte OF OFAESDNL a AVE 9 SW 11ST ST • S RECORDING CERTIFICATE ,��� SPRINGBROOK CREEK WETLAND Date 07/21/08 SECTION INDEX DATA SHEET Pt 5' °4o�f Auditor's File No Dwn.By.ITN PROJECT. 19 � ��: V'�F 'q.p Filed for record by INCA ENGINEERS. INC. on • thls_dM.ay of ,20-00 Ch5.8y RSC AND HABITAT MITIGATION BANK OF N.' In volume of Surveys of Page_, INCA ENGINEERS INC. UNIT E (F 400 112th Avenue NE F.B. 19 hr agt' records of County, Washington. SIJIte 400 CLIENT.+I.u9 Bellevue,WA.98004 Fie Name WASHINGTON STATE D.O.T. PIRES:5/17/ CITY OF RENTON JOB NO. Manager Superintendent of Records (425)635-1000 row-sheet-Dolt 05-0418 06/12/1994 23:11 2062831924 WATERS EDGE PAGE 02 8/7/0(0 pj ' ¢.,off 671,0� CITY OF RENTON P,l�,� G -41JUL 1 ? MMO6 9:574,,n , UM-04-b2V, V RECEIVED ,,4600, July 14, 2006 cOITY CLEW'S OFFICE Dear Fred Kauffman Hearing Examiner E n Dear Mr. Kauffman, l - We were satisfied with your compromise decision in the Provost Hearing, but we understand the Provosts' are appealing both the setback from the lakeshore and the 2 story requirements. We feel strongly that the shoreline setback should not be further altered. There are multiple new homes to the south of us that are within the 25 foot setback rule. For example: 3601 Lk. Wash. Blvd. N. measures more than 30 feet back in respect of his northern neighbor, Darius Richards, and 3613 Lk. Wash. Blvd. N. is 25 feet back in respect of the code. These are the 2 closest to us. The northern properties on the Barbee Mill site are on commercial property, which possibly explains why their set backs are not to code? If the Provosts are permitted to build any closer to the huge--- 75 foot redwood tree, it will require more cutting of limbs on the east side of the tree as well as further damage the root system. The tree has already been weakened recently by a fire, then the building of the house on the Provost's south lot. There are only 5 feet between the tree trunk and err►' the water. We are seriously concerned about the tree's livelihood. Please see the 4 enclosed document of a study that was done recently for a 25 foot redwood tree at 3601 Lk Wash Blvd. N. This study was done June 06 in preparation for the teardown and building of a new home on this small lot. We'd like to draw your attention to the Discussion and Recommendations and Attachment I—Tree Protection Measures. This—75 foot tree is one of the few remaining old growth trees on the south end of Lk. Washington. We would like to see an environmental impact statement on protecting its livelihood. When we met with Laureen Nicloay, AICP Senior Planner in February '06, she mentioned that vegetation within 10 - 25 feet of the lakefront can not be touched. Is this correct? She cited Ordinances 5136 and 5137. Please review Ordinance 5136 pg. 24 (i)Preservation of critically important vegetation and/or habitat features.... And Ordinance 5137 Section VI, 4-4-130 A. Purpose discusses why trees are important to the environment and human health. We'd appreciate knowing someone in the planning department is accountable for reviewing these, and letting us know that this was done and by whom. Al and Cindie Provost are non-residents who live in Gig Harbor and are developing the 2 lots they own to the south of us for resale. I submit that permanent residents should get a say as to what their neighborhood will look and feel after the developers have moved on. They will be gone within a year or so and over a 2-5 year period we will be living with the potential death of this stately tree, not the Provosts. • Is it ethical/permitted to reduce an existing neighbor's privacy and views, and impact the environment negatively for short sighted larger economic gain that will come as a result of not following the codes? We understand the Provost's have a right to develop their property, and having purchased this property, they have assumed the limitations that come with a small lot. We are okay with development, but think it fair and just that it be to code. It seems that the Provosts have development plans that are excessive, have disregard for the stewardship of the old growth tree, shoreline protection and neighbor goodwill. Their existing development house is 17 feet from the water on the northernmost corner, as seen in a sink hole in the lawn that shows the lake water beneath. This is already a variance granted to them. How can a Senior Planner, Jill Ding,testify to something she has never seen or inspected? We repeatedly asked her to come out to the site before the last hearing, and she never did. She made no critical analysis of the situation. What were the environmental decisions made in regards to this lot? When will the next public hearing be scheduled? To be clear,we wish the front of this development house to have no more than 2 stories, as all the other homes here have and the code states. We are okay with 3 in the back to allow for a daylight basement. A smaller home on this small lot will have less impact in vehicles, people, noise, view blockage, privacy, etc. We wish it stated directly that there will never be a deck, or people, on top of the existing boathouse. It has been an eyesore for years . It blocks our view significantly, which we `'' accepted when we purchased our property, but we do not want to see people out on top of it ever. In summary, we respectfully request an on-site inspection, and Environmental Impact Statement, and consideration of return to code instead of offering any variances. The Provosts obviously are not grateful for the variances given. Please let us know the answers to our questions. Concerned, Rebecca Wynsome A) Gary Weil ---� WAtiy e j7.4Azt — iwr• f -h 3 , 6 S t/ . 6u014 1/ N . 06/12/1994 23: 11 2062831924 WATERS EDGE PAGE 04 Gilles Consulting Brian K. Gilles 4 2 5 8 2 2 - 4 9 9 4 EVALUATION OF SELECTED TREES AT RICHARDS PROPERTY 3605 LAKE WASHINGTON BLVD NORTH, RENTON, WA 98056 June 9, 2006 PREPARED FOR: t)ariu.s aiid Vicki Rickards 3605 Lake Wishingtuia Boulevard North x :riti)ir, WA 913056 PREPARED BY: GILLES CONSULTING Brian K. Gilles, Consulting Arborist ISA Certified Arborist # PN-0260 ASCA Registered Consulting Arborist # RCA-418 Now Fax: 425-822-6314 E-mail: bkgilles@comcast.net P.O. Box 2366 Kirkland. WA 98083 bb/1 L/1 y74 L 7:11 Lt7bLti.il bL4 WA I tN5 tllUt h''AUt b5 Evaluation of Trees for Darius and Vicki Richards Gilles Consulting June 9, 2006 Page 2 of l I Nogoo CONTENTS ASSIGNMENT 3 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 3 METHODOLOGY 3 OBSERVATIONS 3 DISCUSSION AND RECOMMENDATIONS 4 House Design: 5 Preconstruction Treatment 5 Protection of the Soil in the Yard Area: .... .. 5 Pruning of Limbs 5 Tree Protection Measures 6 WAIVER OF LIABILITY 6 ATTACHMENTS 7 ' 06/12/1994 23:11 2062831924 WATERS EDGE PAGE 06 Evaluation of Trees for Darius and Vicki Richards Gilles Consulting June 9. 2006 N,,,,,,,. Page 3 of I I ASSIGNMENT Darius and Vickie Richards contracted with Gilles Consulting to provide them with an evaluation of the current condition of a large tree on their waterfront yard. They also requested a set of tree protection measures to provide the architect and general contractor to be able to save the tree during the demolition of he existing house and the construction of he new house on the lot. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY The tree in question is a stately and old Western Red Cedar tree in good condition. The demolition and removal of the existing house as well as the construction of he new home should be able to be completed while retaining the large tree if adequate tree protection measures are followed. The critical root zone of the tree is restricted and must be protected during construction. The remaining branches and the trunk must also be protected during construction. If the tree protection measures outlined below are followed the tree should survive the stress of construction and survive long-term, METHODOLOGY To evaluate the tree and to prepare the report, I drew upon my 25+ years of experience in `r•"' the field of arboriculture and my formal education in natural resources management, dendrology, forest ecology, plant identification, and plant physiology I also followed the protocol of the International Society of Arboriculture (ISA) for Hazard Tree Assessment that includes looking at the overall health of the tree as well as the site conditions. This is a scientifically based process to look at the entire site, surrounding land and soil, as well as a complete look at the tree itself. In examining the tree, I looked at such factors as: size, vigor, canopy and foliage condition, density of needles, injury, insect activity, root damage and root collar health, crown health, evidence of disease-causing bacteria, fungi or virus, dead wood and hanging limbs. While no one can predict with absolute certainty which trees will or will not fail, we can, by using this scientific process, assess which trees are most likely to fail and take appropriate action to minimize injury and damage OBSERVATIONS TREE # 1 SPECIES Western Red Cedar, Thuja plicata DIAMETER STD 34.3 inches HEIGHTH ,,. LIVE CROWN • The live canopy, expressed as a percentage of the entire loftRATIO tree height is 80%. • This is considered adequate photosynthetic capacity for the 06/12/1994 23:11 2062831924 WATERS EDGE HAGt U( - Evaluation of Trees for Darius and Vicki Richards Gilles Consulting June 9. 2006 Page 4 of 11 tree to support itself. SYMMETRY • The canopy is generally symmetrical with an even weight distribution around the trunk. FOLIAGE � Average density though slightly pale The tree was trimmed and thinned recently CROWN CONDITION • The top 10%to 15% of the canopy is healthy • This is an indication of good health and vigor. • The tree was previously topped @ appx. 26 feet • There are 5 new trunks growing above the old topping TRUNK wound. ▪ The entire tree has a lean to the northwest toward the neighbor's boat house. • Where the trunk enters the soil and flares out into buttress ROOT COLLAR roots, there are no apparent defects, no apparent insect infestations, no apparent fungal or bacterial infections. • The amount of soil volume available for root growth is restricted. There are hard surfaces to the north with the ROOTS neighbor's boat access, paved patio, and the house, to the east are concrete planters and the existing house • The only root area available is the small lawn between the , .14110 existing house and the shoreline/bulkhead. COMMENTS • M1nor branch loss on South side in mid-canopy likely due to ice storm in January 2004 • The tree is in good health and vigor at this time. • The structure of the tree is slightly compromised at the old topping wound. Close observation with binoculars did not HEALTH RATING reveal any indications of internal rot or decay at the old topping wound. The structure is weaker than an un-topped tree. However the tree appears solid and worthy of extraordinary measures to retain RECOMMENDATION • Follow strict Tree Protection Measures DISCUSSION AND RECOMMENDATIONS The size and majesty of the tree combined with its good condition mean that this tree adds thousands of dollars of value to your property and is worth the extra effort to protect. The major issues in preserving this tree and having it survive long-term will be protecting he trunk from physical damage and protecting the critical root zone from compaction. Key to this will be planning work flow and supply flow prior to the construction to be able to keep the lawn and critical root zone free of any use during the construction. Given the limited space of the lot and access this will be an important issue to deal with your architect and your general contractor in the bid discussions. klb/1'1/1 yy4 2d: 11 2e1b2a.j1y14 Wil I L.Hb I_)UE F'AUE= b!i Evaluation of Trees for Darius and Vicki Richards Gilles Consulting June 9. 2006 Aimisto Page 5 of 11 House Design: One consideration is to design the new house on piers and beams for the western portion The piers can be excavated using an air spade. If the design is flexible enough to allow the piers to be moved a foot in any direction then the piers can move to accommodate large roots rather than risk the long-term health of the tree by cutting them. The amount of large roots cut is critical to the long-term health of the tree. This is a case where"less is better." The more roots retained the better for the health of the tree and the better for safety. The minimum distance from the base of the tree that I would recommend for excavation is 5 feet to the east and 6 feet to the south. If that can be pushed to 10 feet and 12 feet it would be better. Precnnstrtiction nient: In an effort to assist the tree in dealing with the stresses of construction, specifically the loss of root volume and photosynthetic capacity due to additional trimming, 1 recommend that you treat the tree with a soil injection of tree based fertilizer and beneficial fungi and beneficial bacteria. Trees have different chemical requirements than shrubs and grass Tree based fertilizer is specifically formulated to meet those needs. Beneficial fungi, known as mycorrhizal fungi form a symbiotic relationship with tree roots that result in stimulated root growth and better absorption of water and nutrients. Beneficial bacteria Protection of the Soil in the Yard Area; Given the amount of hardscapes surrounding the tree there is little doubt where the majority of the roots are located. This lawn area and planter bed areas must be protected from compaction and direct damage of the roots. Soil compaction is an insidious problem that is out of sight and can take 2 to 20 years to kill a tree. Soil compaction is the problem of compressing the voids in between the mineral particles of soil, It is a result of parking equipment,soil, building supplies, debris, vehicles and anything heavy on the soil. These voids are vital for the absorption of water and air. Without adequate pore space tree roots wither and die. This results in a long slow death of large trees The weight of vehicle tires or other objects can tear the top and side layers of bark off the roots. Once this happens the roots succumb to disease and begin to rot This can slowly kill the tree. Pruning of Limbs The limbs to the east and south will need to be trimmed in order to accommodate the new house and the space needed to safely build the new house. I strongly recommend that you hire a qualified International Society of Arboriculture Certified Arborist to "clean climb" the tree and cut the required branches carefully and one at a time. Given the increased stresses of construction, I strongly recommend that you only remove the minimum amount of foliage to safely build the house at this time. Two or four years in the future when the tree has had some time to adapt to the new environment and recover *m,, from the construction you may want to remove a few more branches that improve view or 06/12/1994 23: 11 2062831924 WATERS EDGE HAUL ey - Evaluation of Trees for Darius and Vicki Richards Gilles Consulting June 9.2000 Page 6oCi1 shape of the tree. For now, especially since the tree was recently thinned, having the most photosynthetic capacity possible will better serve the long-term health of the tree. Tree Protection Measures In order for trees to survive the stresses placed upon them in the construction process, tree protection must be planned in advance of equipment arrival on site. If tree protection is not planned integral with the design and layout of the project, the trees will suffer needlessly and will possibly die. With proper preparation, often costing little, or nothing extra to the project budget, trees can survive and thrive after construction This is critical for tree survival because damage prevention is the single most effective treatment for trees on construction sites. Once trees are damaged, the treatment options available are limited. The minimum Tree Protection Measures are included on three separate sheets in Attachment 2, Tree Protection Measures so that they can be copied and introduced into all relevant documents such as site plans, permit applications and conditions of approval, and bid documents so that everyone involved is aware of the requirements These Tree Protection Measures are intended to be both specific to this tree generic in nature specifically about excavation and other construction practices. They will need to be adjusted to the specific circumstances of your site that takes into account the location of improvements and the locations of the trees. WAIVER OF LIABILITY There are many conditions affecting a tree's health and stability which may be present and cannot be ascertained, such as, root rot, previous or unexposed construction damage, internal cracks, stem rot and more which may be hidden. Changes in circumstances and conditions can also cause a rapid deterioration of a tree's health and stability. Adverse weather conditions can dramatically affect the health and safety of a tree in a very short amount of time. While I have used every reasonable means to examine these trees, this evaluation represents my opinion of the tree health at this point in time. These findings do not guarantee future safety nor are they predictions of future events. The tree evaluation consists of an external visual inspection of an individual tree's root flare, trunk, and canopy from the ground only unless otherwise specified. The inspection may also consist of taking trunk or root soundings for sound comparisons to aid the evaluator in determining the possible extent of decay within a tree. Soundings are only an aid to the evaluation process and do not replace the use of other more sophisticated diagnostic tools for determining the extent of decay within a tree. As conditions change, it is the responsibility of the property owners to schedule additional site visits by the necessary professionals to ensure that the long-term success of the project is ensured. It is the responsibility of the property owner to obtain all required permits from city, county, state, or federal agencies. It is the responsibility of 06/12/1994 23:11 2062831924 WATERS EDGE PAGE 10 Evaluation of Trees for Darius and Vicki Richards Gilles Consulting June 9, 2006 Page 7 of 11 the property owner to comply with all applicable laws, regulations, and permit conditions. If there is a homeowners association, it is the responsibility of the property owner to comply with all Codes, Covenants, and Restrictions (CC&R's) that apply to tree pruning and tree removal. This tree evaluation is to be used to inform and guide the client in the management of their tree. This in no way implies that the evaluator is responsible for performing recommended actions or using other methods or tools to further determine the extent of internal tree problems without written authorization from the client. Furthermore, the evaluator in no way holds that the opinions and recommendations are the only actions required to insure that the tree will not fail. A second opinion is recommended. The client shall hold the evaluator harmless for any and all injuries or damages incurred if the evaluator's recommendations are not followed or for acts of nature beyond the evaluator's reasonable expectations, such as severe winds, excessive rains, heavy snow loads, etc. This report and all attachments, enclosures, and references, are confidential and are for the use of the client concerned. They may not be reproduced, used in any way, or Now disseminated in any form without the prior consent of the client concerned and Gilles Consulting. Thank you for calling Gilles Consulting for your arboricultural needs Please call me if I can provide more information or be of further service. Sincerely, Bria . Gilles, Consultin bo st International Society of Arboriculture Certified Arborist –PN-0260A American Society of Consulting Arborists, Registered Consulting Arborist–RCA-418 ATTACHMENTS ATTACHMENT 1 - TREE PROTECTION MEASURES ATTACHMENT 2 -REFERENCES bb/1 L/1 yy4 2d: 11 Lbb2t1.31'd24 WA I LK5 .DUE I-AU± 11 • Evaluation of Trees for Darius and Vicki Richards Gilles Consulting June 9. 2006 Page 8 of 11 *4400 ATTACHMENT 1 - TREE PROTECTION MEASURES • Tree Protection Fences will need to be placed around the tree and the lawn area o Tree Protection Fences must be inspected prior to the beginning of any construction work/activities. o Nothing must be parked or stored within the Tree Protection Fence—no equipment, vehicles, soil, debris, or construction supplies of any sorts o Cement trucks must not be allowed to deposit waste or wash out materials from their trucks within the Tree Protection Fence. • The area within the Tree Protection Fencing should be covered with wood chips, hog fuel, or similar materials to a depth of 8 to 10 inches. The materials should be placed prior to beginning construction and remain until the Tree Protection Fencing is taken down. o If the area is totally free from construction activities the area could be left as lawn if it is watered. o The Tree Protection Fences need to be clearly marked with the following or similar text in four inch or larger letters: ,4001 "TREE PROTECTION FENCE DO NOT ENTER THIS AREA DO NOT PARK OR STORE MATERIALS WITHIN THE PROTECTION AREA Any questions, call Brian K Gilles at Gills Consulting 425-417-0850" • ExcavatiQn: When excavation occurs near the tree, an air spade would be best. This unit uses compressed air to blow soil away from the roots to create a trench or a hole for a pier. The loosened soil can then be shoveled carefully away. Roots can then be cut cleanly as noted below. o If an air spade is not available, and when removing existing concrete structures and walkways, the following procedure muse be followed to protect the long term survivability of the tree: o An International Society of Arboriculture, (ISA) Certified Arborist must be working with all equipment operators. o The Certified Arborist should be outfitted with a shovel, hand pruners, a pair of loppers, a handsaw, and a power saw (a "sawsall" is recommended). o The Arborist will instruct the equipment operator to comb the concrete and soil away from the tree in small shallow bucket movements. 06/12/1994 23:11 2062831924 WATERS EDGE PAGE 12 Evaluation of Trees for Darius and Vicki Richards Gilles Consulting June 9,2006 Page 9 of 11 o When any roots of one inch diameter or greater, of the tree to be retained, is struck by the equipment, the Certified Arborist should stop the equipment operator. • The Certified Arborist should then excavate around the tree root by hand/shovel and cleanly cut the tree root. • The Certified Arborist should then instruct the equipment operator to continue. • Boring or Tunneling: o Boring under the root systems of trees (and other vegetation) shall be done under the supervision of an ISA Certified Arborist. This is to be accomplished by excavating a limited trench or pit on each side of the critical root zone of the tree and then hand digging or pushing the pipe through the soil under the tree. The closest pit walls shall be a minimum of 7 feet from the center of the tree and shall be sufficient depth to lay the pipe at the grade as shown on the plan and profile. o Tunneling under the roots of trees shall be done under the supervision of an ISA Certified Arborist in an open trench by carefully excavating and hand digging around areas where large roots are exposed. No roots 1 inch in diameter or larger shall be cut. o The contractor shall verify the vertical and horizontal location of existing utilities to avoid conflicts and maintain minimum clearances, adjustment shall be made to the grade of the new utility as required. • Water: o The tree will require significant watering throughout the summer and early fall in order to survive long-term. As we discussed, the best watering is to be done using soaker hoses placed at least three feet from the trunk of the tree and spiraled around the tree where possible. One 75-foot soaker hose should be adequate. It is best to place the soaker using landscape staples, (available from HD Fowler in Bellevue for pennies apiece) then cover the area with composed materials. The composted material will act as a mulch to minimize evaporation and will also stimulate the microbial activity of the soil which is another benefit to the health of the tree o Water the tree to a depth of 18 to 20 inches. I recommended leaving the water on the soaker hose for a couple hours and then digging down to determine how deep your water is penetrating. Then adjust accordingly. o Once the water reaches the proper depth, turn off the hose for four weeks and then water again. Water more often when temperatures increase— every three weeks when temperatures exceed 80 degrees and every two weeks when temperatures exceed 90 degrees. This drying out of the soil in between watering is important to prevent soil pathogens from attacking 110e the trees. bb/1'1/1 J4 1J:11 1bb1bJi J14 WA I LHS ha*. PAUL IJ Evaluation of Trees for Danus and Vicki Richards Gilles Consulting June 9.2006 Page l0 of II .4. 2 r Significant Existing Tree r • • Continuous chainlink 1,r''' i11. Fencing Post @ Max 10'O.C. _�. iti • j' ! 1 Install asshown on plans a minimum of 5 feet outside . iits 1441 Ai., dripline of tree(s) %4%..;.1.: ...11�o1i'�•���i►�i i•Ii Ilii•�•1•Ii i i i 1 i��1•I47....... .. • i���1•ii/i1��i���i 1.•.e.°1IIi••1.:.�a•1///1///:////9/'s i i 1111111111•••i•//•►1/////•i///i 11111 111..1 1.1. 11ii i• ••1.1.1.111•►•I I1 i� •••�Ili 1.1••••. •1• ..*****".••••••:%•;':•:•:•:•:•:•••:,•••••,..:•:::•:•:•:::•••••••:•:•:•••••e:•:. 1"!...:I. ••�ii•i ► i•i • i i • 1"1 1. •/♦ •/1 ••♦ • •• • • / • • a •1•1••1 ••••1•/••• X �I .i►►11►0:.,../•••••••••••%•••••••••• •1•1 ►,/11./•••11••/•:/1 1 1,••1/•/•1 1.1.1• t •••••••,I•►•• ••••�•••.••1•••1••11•'•'•1�.:••••/•.•/•..••....e.••••11.. Z 1 i•t�11•111�1•�1. 1• • • • 1 •11/••1.1.11•••1••t [1Ntiod i••.• i1••i a 1 i a•�1:•• :••••1.1.1.1•••••1 1:••/./././••••1/1::t T •• :::::::•:•:•::::::::::::::::::::/•:•:•:•:::•:•:•:•::::::::::::::•:•:•:' :Q �1:::::::::::::•:•:•:•:•:•:•:•:•:•:1 1.1 1 /1 1 . :: •i 1.1.1• 111 •1.1.1.111.•1••••••I •. •1►••• •I•1•1 ••• 1.•. •••1�•.••••1 1 1 1 1•• t1.►���•i11 1�•�1••i i••�1•i.1 1�:.1.1••1:•I�••i i••11.1•1•1•i t • :::%::::::::::::::::::::•:•:•:•: ••• •••/►• •1•1•♦•.:t:`:`:!:!:`:!:•.:!::::•!..:44'.55'.4 x•• 1 1. Six-foot high temporary chainlink fence shall be placed as shown on plans. Fence shall completely encircle tree(s). Install fence posts using pier blocks only. Avoid driving posts or stakes into major roots, 2. Make a clean straight cut to remove damaged portion of root for all roots over 1" in diameter damaged during construction. All exposed roots shall be temporarily covered with damp burlap and covered with soils the same day, if possible, to prevent drying. If not possible, burlap must be kept moist at all times. 3. Work with the protection fencing shall be done manually. No stockpiling of materials, soil, debris, vehicle traffic, or storage of equipment or machinery shall be allowed within the limit of the fencing. 4. Cement trucks must not be allowed to deposit waste or wash out materials from their trucks within the Tree Protection Fences. 5. The area within the Tree Protection Fencing must be covered with wood chips, hog fuel, or similar materials to a depth of 8 to 10 inches. The materials should be placed prior to beginning construction and remain until the Tree Protection Fencing is taken down. t7b/11/1 yy4 2.3: l l 2b1D2Iddl yL4 WA I tK5 t1lat rHuc. 14 Evaluation of Trees for Darius and Vicki Richards Gilles Consulting June 9, 2006 Page 1 1 of 1 1 ATTACHMENT 2- REFERENCES 1. Harris, Richard W. et al, Arboriculture, Integrated Management of Landscape Trees, Shrubs, and Vines, Fourth Edition, Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River, New Jersey. 2004. 2. Matheney, Nelda P. & Clark James R., Evaluation of Hazard Trees, Second Edition, The International Society of Arboriculture Press, Savoy, Illinois 1994 3. Matheney, Nelda P. & Clark James R., Trees&Development, A Technical Guide N Preservation of Trees During Land Development, The International Society of Arboriculture Press, Savoy, Illinois. 1998. 4. Mathews, Daniel, Cascade * Olympic Natural History, Raven Editions w/the Portland Audubon Society, Portland, OR 1992. 5, Mattheck, Claus Prof and Ass. Jur Mrs. Helge Breloer, The Body Language of Trees, A Handbook,for Failure Analysis, HMSO, London, England. 1994. 6. Pojar, Jim & MacKinnon, Andy, Plants of the Pacific Northwest Coast, Lone Pine 'wow Publishing, Redmond, WA 1994. 7. Scharpf, Robert F. Diseases of Pacific Coast Conifers, USDA Forest Service, Agriculture Handbook 521, revised June 1993 8. Watson, Dr. Gary W., & Dr. Dan Neely Editors, Trees &Building Sites, The International Society of Arboriculture Press, Savoy, IL. 1995. *Ire. Correyc/ldeftce. S- 7tib July 21, 20061� 64"44141a 2 4 2.006 Noire Dear, Randy Corman ` PisLJ w tatJ. RECEIVED City of Renton Council President s 4 CT?'CLERK'S OFFICE A"IS 6w)*flak Atizoid, Ind,viduod letter /a I'm writing in regard to the proposed rezoning of a portion of upper Kennydale brought each about by the request to rezone the Blueberry farm property from RC to R-8 or R-4. I hoc attended the Planning Commission meeting on July 19, 2006 and came away with more ' questions than answers. I have spoken with Renton's City Planners and they have always responded quickly, but their answers seem ubiquitous to me. I feel that the Blueberry farm request for rezoning is being used to address other issues at the expense of the property owners in the proposed rezone area. Property owners whose property taxes have risen greatly due to the high-density building, which has taken, place. My property taxes have risen 183% in 8-years. Of that increase the City taxes has risen 161%, Land value have increased 288%. If there is no other underlying motive than responding to the Blueberry farm owner's request to rezone their property, it should be addressed without taking this shotgun approach based upon the stated concern of spot zoning. The Blueberry farm is already spot-zoned RC. It could be rezoned to R-8 the same as the surrounding properties. The wetland requirements would greatly limit the number of homes, which are built on this property, end of issue. State and other expert's state that the Blueberry farm property is a peat bog and no additional building should be allowed on it. As one expert stated " if the bog is ten feet deep, it took in excess of 5,000 years for the bog to reach its present condition and it 'ika'' cannot be replaced, such as wet-lands can. I strongly urge you as City Council President to quickly resolve this contemptuous issue and cancel the August 23, 2006 Upper Kennydale R-4 Rezone meeting. Notify all property owners, which have already strongly opposed the rezoning of their properties at the Planing Commission meeting and that the area rezone issue being removed from consideration. One possibility for the Blueberry property could be the purchase by the city as a public park, pea-patch or other public use, which would not damage the property and the peat bog and allow it to continue as a buffer for seasonal run-off. Sincerely, Harry A. Kodis 2619 Jones Ave N.E. Renton, WA 98056 425-226-9477 Kodis-BPS@att.net COTTes'DOIZde,l(& S-7-02.06) CITY OF RENTON /?ekr 119 �f r JUL 2 . 2006 err► �4off�olp�/�j�°I?r CITY CLERKS OFFICE domm/Wee- July 18, 2006 i Via/ each Dear Counselman Corman etiocr'I,rsie ker My name is Keith Thompson and I live in the Renton Highlands study area in which I currently own two properties. They are duplexes and are located at 660 and 650 Index place N. E. My concern in writing this letter has to do with the possible changes regarding the zoning of my properties. Currently I am zoned for R10 but have been told by folks in the planning department that there is a good chance that the current zoning will be down graded to R8 (single family). Should this be done, myself and others like me, will suffer financial loss and for those of us who are retiring or about to retire, we have no way to re-coop those loses for our active "working days" are over. I, myself am hoping to retire this November, but '`'"'` that some what hinges upon what I am able to do with my properties. I recently lost a prospective buyer for one of my duplexes because of the uncertainty of the zoning issues. For those who bought their property(s) under the R10 zoning, retirement plans were made based upon what that zoning would allow us to do by way of either selling in the future or developing the site according to the R10 zoning. Should the zoning be reduced to R8, you will greatly limit any options that we currently now have and inevitable result will be financial loss. Obviously I want to go on the record as opposing the possible zoning down grade and encourage you to leave it at R10. Also I want to go on the record as one who supports your efforts to bring redevelopment to the Highlands. I have lived up here for 16 years and am convinced that redevelopment will only come if the city presses forward with their proposed plans. My question is: Why can't you do this and leave the current R10 zoning in place? Sincerely eith Thompson SOD . tdex R. NE /e41on, W11. 9 7056 1_'"7770vr2 BY 1 FINANCE COMMITTEE REPORT July 24, 2006 Date S-7- '006 APPROVAL OF CLAIMS AND PAYROLL VOUCHERS The Finance Committee approves for payment on July 24, 2006, claim vouchers 250358-250779 and 2 wire transfers, totaling $3,750,164.41 , and 648 direct deposits, payroll vouchers 64425-64791, and 1 wire transfer, totaling $2,156,653.50 . CM Don Persson, Chair 0/ea",.— Denis Law, Vice-Chair Toni Nelson, Member A 1'1OVED BY 1 PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT COMMITTEE Cid COUNCIL COMMITTEEE REPORT Date ?'"" August 7, 2006 Proposed Amendments to RMC 9-11 —Street Grid System (Referred April 24, 2006) The Planning and Development Committee recommends concurrence in the staff recommendation that the Street Grid System be amended as follows: • Newly annexed areas will retain their current addresses, except those areas in the East Renton Plateau west of 160th Ave. SE, north of Maple Valley Highway, and south of May Valley Rd. • Addresses in the East Renton Plateau west of 160th Ave. SE, north of Maple Valley Highway, and south of Maple Valley Rd. will be readdressed according to the adopted Street Naming System • SE May Valley Road would retain its name and numbering system, and the portion of the roadway known as NE 31st St. would be restored to its original numbering system and name • 156th Ave. SE will be renamed Vantage Blvd. NE south of NE 4th St., Vantage Pl. NE north of NE 4th St., and Vantage Ct. SE south of SE l42nd Pl. • Vantage Blvd. will continue to the Maple Valley Highway along SE 142"Pl. (between 154th Ave. SE and 156th Ave. SE) and 154th Pl. SE • Vesta Ave. NE will be returned to its original name and numbering system (156th Avenue SE), until such time that all segments of 156th Ave. SE north of SE l361 St./NE 2nd Ct. are annexed into the City of Renton • 68th Ave S, south of Martin Luther King Way, will be renamed Monster Rd. SW • SE Carr Road, SE 179th St., SE 176th St., and SE Petrovitsky Rd. shall be named SE Carr Rd. west of 108th Ave. SE and SE Petrovitsky Rd. east of 108th Ave. SE • SE Renton-Maple Valley Rd. shall be renamed Maple Valley Highway The Committee further recommends that the ordinance regarding this matter be prepared for first reading. \-1-(7// Terri Briere, hair Dan Clawson, Vice-Chair Marcie Palmer, Member cc: Gregg Zimmerman Neil Watts Rebecca Lind UTILITIES COMMITTEE APPROVED BY 1 COMMITTEE REPORT Calf COUNCIL Date Si-7"6 August 7, 2006 Springbrook Creek Wetland and Habitat Mitigation Bank Agreements Approval (June 12, 2006) The Utilities Committee recommends concurrence in the staff recommendation to approve the following agreements associated with the Springbrook Creek Wetland and Habitat Mitigation Bank and forward to the Mayor and City Clerk to sign the agreements in accordance with Resolution 3822, as approved by Council on June 19, 2006: • Bank Oversight Committee/Co-Sponsors Memorandum of Agreement. • WSDOT/City of Renton Springbrook Creek Wetland and Habitat Mitigation Bank Agreement. • Conservation Easement, Reimbursement Agreement with the Cascade Land Conservancy, and Assignment Agreement. The approval of City funding to include the construction of the Springbrook Trail, as proposed in Springbrook Creek Wetland and Habitat Mitigation Bank project, will be made separately following the WSDOT construction contract bid opening for the project. / Dan Clawson, Chair Terri Brier ice Chair Denis W. Law, Member cc: Lys Hornsby,Utility Systems Director Ron Straka,Surface Water Utility Engineering Supervisor CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON ORDINANCE NO. AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON, AMENDING THE 2006 BUDGET BY CREATING A REVENUE ACCOUNT FOR RECEIPT OF FUNDS FROM THE HUD BEDI GRANT #B-02-SP-WA-0758 IN THE AMOUNT OF $300,000 GRANTED TO THE CITY ON JUNE 16, 2004M, TO REIMBURSE EXPENSES UNDER CAG#05-127 WITH HDR ENGINEERING FOR$50,000 AND CAG#05-097 WITH WSDOT, PROJECT CGA4310R FOR $250,000, AND DECLARING AN EMERGENCY. NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON, DOES ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS: SECTION L Appropriation in the General Governmental Fund is hereby increased as follows: Funds 2006 Budget 2006 Adjusted Original Increase Budget Budget Noir R000.000000.023.3310.0014.20.000000 0 $300,000 $300,000 E000.000000.023.5580.0080.41.000000 0 $50,000 $50,000 E000.000000.023.5580.0080.52.000000 0 $250,000 $250,000 Source of funds: HUD BEDI GRANT#B-02-SP-WA-0758 SECTION IL Incoming Revenue and contract expenditures are hereby added to the 2006 budget. SECTION TEL An emergency is hereby declared and this ordinance shall become effective immediately upon its passage and approval. PASSED BY THE CITY COUNCIL this day of , 2006. Bonnie I. Walton, City Clerk 1 ORDINANCE NO. APPROVED BY THE MAYOR this day of , 2006. Kathy Keolker, Mayor Approved as to form: Lawrence J. Warren, City Attorney Date of Publication: ORD.1274:7/21/06:ma 2 /57 twiny 7-/7-06 fidy/el " 7766 CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON ORDINANCE NO. .0/6 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON, AMENDING THE 2006 BUDGET BY TRANSFERRING FUNDS IN THE AMOUNT OF $70,000 FROM THE 2005 YEAR-END FUND BALANCE FOR THE PURPOSE OF PUBLIC INFORMATION AND COMMUNITY OUTREACH EFFORTS RELATED TO ANNEXATION AND INCORPORATION, WITH $60,087 GOING TO PRR, INC., 0/114051 H; TO CONDUCT THAT WORK, AND DECLARING AN EMERGENCY. NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON, DOES ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS: SECTION L Appropriation in the General Governmental Fund is hereby increased as follows: 2006 Original Budget 2006 Adjusted Fund Budget Increase Budget 000.000000.003.5130.0010.41.000193 21,100 $70,000 $91,100 Source of funds: 2005 year-end fund balance. SECTION H. Funds for this line item are hereby added to the 2006 budget and hereby removed from the 2005 year-end fund balance. SECTION HL An emergency is hereby declared and this ordinance shall become effective immediately upon its passage and approval. PASSED BY THE CITY COUNCIL this day of , 2006. Bonnie I. Walton, City Clerk 1 r - ORDINANCE NO. APPROVED BY THE MAYOR this day of , 2006. Kathy Keolker, Mayor Approved as to form: • Lawrence J. Warren, City Attorney Date of Publication: ORD.1272.7/3/06:ma 2