HomeMy WebLinkAboutCouncil 10/16/2006 AGENDA
RENTON CITY COUNCIL
REGULAR MEETING
October 16,2006
Monday, 7 p.m.
1. CALL TO OfdiER AND PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE
2. ROLL CALL`
3. SPECIAL PRESENTATION: Police Department Promotional Recognition
4. PUBLIC MEETING WITH THE INITIATOR:
Marshall Annexation- 10%Notice of Intent to annex petition for 7.6 acres located west of Duvall
Ave. NE and north of NE Sunset Blvd.
5. ADMINISTRATIVE REPORT
6. AUDIENCE COMMENT (Speakers must sign up prior to the Council meeting. Each speaker is
allowed five minutes. The comment period will be limited to one-half hour. The second audience
comment period later on in the agenda is unlimited in duration.)
When you are recognized by the Presiding Officer,please walk to the podium and state your name.
and address for the record, SPELLING YOUR LAST NAME.
7. CONSENT AGENDA
The following items are distributed to CounciImembers in advance for study and review, and the
1/44600, recommended actions will be accepted in a single motion. Any item may be removed for further
discussion if requested by a Councilmember.
a. Approval of Council meeting minutes of 10/9/2006. Council concur.
b. City Clerk submits Quarterly Contract List for period of 7/1/2006 to 9/30/2006; 62 contracts and
17 addenda totaling$24,392,293.94. Information.
c. City Clerk reports bid opening on 10/10/2006 for CAG-06-168,Coulon Beach Log Boom and
Transient Moorage Repair; four bids;engineer's estimate$105,000; and submits staff
recommendation to award the contract to low bidder,Richard Phillips Marine, Inc., in the amount
of$69,632, Council concur.
d. Economic Development,Neighborhoods and Strategic Planning Department recommends
approval to increase the impact fee collected on behalf of the Issaquah School District, and
approval to implement an impact fee to be collected on behalf of the Kent School District. Refer
to Finance Committee; set public hearing on 11/20/2006.
e. Finance and Information Services Department recommends a public hearing be set on 11/6/2006
to consider the 2007 Revenue Sources and Preliminary Budget,and a public hearing be set on
12/4/2006 to consider the 2007 Budget. Refer to committee of the Whole; set public hearings.
f. Hearing Examiner recommends approval,with conditions,of the West Coast Preliminary Plat; 60
single-family lots on 10.82 acres located at 4925 NE 4th St. (PP-04-149). Council concur.
8. CORRESPONDENCE
9. UNFINISHED BUSINESS
Topics listed below were discussed in Council committees during the past week. Those topics
marked with an asterisk(*)may include legislation. Committee reports on any topics may be held byktioi
Chair if further review is necessary.
a. Community Services Committee: Patricia Riggs Appointment to Municipal Arts Commission
(CONTINUED ON REVERSE SIDE)
; 10. RESOLUTIONS AND ORDINANCES
Ordinances for second and final reading:
a. Approving the Querin II Annexation(1st reading 1019/2006)
b. Establishing R-4 zoning for 10.70 acres of the Querin II Annexation(1st reading 10/9/2006)
c. Establishing R-8 zoning for 1235 acres of the Querin II Annexation(1st reading 10/9/2006)
11. NEW BUSINESS(Includes Council Committee agenda topics; call 425-430-6512 for recorded
information.)
12. AUDIENCE COMMENT
13. ADJOURNMENT
COMMITTEE OF THE WHOLE
AGENDA
(Preceding Council Meeting)
Council Chambers
5:30 p.m.
Library Master Plan Scope of Work;
Springbrook Trail Approval and Funding;
Vision 20/20+20
1/400,
• Hearing assistance devices for use in the Council Chambers are available request upon to the CityClerk •
P
CITY COUNCIL MEETINGS ARE TELEVISED LIVE ON GOVERNMENT ACCESS CHANNEL 21 AND ARE RE-CABLECAST
TUES.&THURS.AT I I AM&9 PM,WED.&FRI.AT 9 AM&7 PM AND SAT.&SUN.AT 1 PM&9 PM
r
t
RENTON CITY COUNCIL
Regular Meeting
October 16, 2006 Council Chambers
Monday, 7 p.m. MINUTES Renton City Hall
CALL TO ORDER Mayor Kathy Keolker called the meeting of the Renton City Council to order
and led the Pledge of Allegiance to the flag.
ROLL CALL OF RANDY CORMAN, Council President; DON PERSSON; MARCIE PALMER;
COUNCILMEMBERS TERRI BRIERE; DENIS LAW; DAN CLAWSON; TONI NELSON.
CITY STAFF IN KATHY KEOLKER,Mayor; JAY COVINGTON, Chief Administrative
ATTENDANCE Officer; ZANETTA FONTES, Assistant City Attorney; BONNIE WALTON,
City Clerk; GREGG ZIMMERMAN, Planning/Building/Public Works
Administrator; ALEX PIETSCH, Economic Development Administrator; DON
ERICKSON, Senior Planner; MARTY WINE, Assistant CAO; PREETI
SHRIDHAR, Communications Director; TERRY HIGASHIYAMA,
Community Services Administrator; CHIEF KEVIN MILOSEVICH, DEPUTY
CHIEF TIM TROXEL, COMMANDER DAVID LEIBMAN, COMMANDER
KATIE MCCLINCY, COMMANDER FLOYD ELDRIDGE, and
COMMANDER CHARLES MARSALISI, Police Department.
SPECIAL PRESENTATION Chief of Police Kevin Milosevich announced Police Department employee
Police: Employee Promotions promotions as follows:
• Officer Jon Schuldt, promoted to Sergeant;
• Sergeant David Leibman, promoted to Commander; and
• Commander Tim Troxel,promoted to Deputy Chief.
PUBLIC MEETING This being the date set and proper notices having been posted and published in
Annexation: Marshall, Duvall accordance with local and State laws, Mayor Keolker opened the public meeting
Ave NE & NE Sunset Blvd to consider the Marshall 10%Notice of Intent to Annex Petition for
approximately 7.6 acres located adjacent and immediately west of Duvall Ave.
NE,just north of the commercial development at the northwest corner of Duvall
Ave. NE and NE Sunset Blvd. The western boundary is Anacortes Ave. NE, if
extended, and the northern boundary is NE 17th St., if extended.
Senior Planner Don Erickson stated that the site currently contains 26 single-
family dwellings and the topography is relatively flat. He pointed out that the
area is surrounded by the City on all four sides, and has been an unincorporated
island since the mid-1970s. Reviewing the public services, Mr. Erickson noted
that the site is served by Fire District#25, the Renton School District, and
Renton water and sewer. He relayed the Planning/Building/Public Works
Department comments regarding surface water mitigation, old and undersized
water mains, and street surfaces.
Mr. Erickson reported that the existing King County zoning is R-4 (four
dwelling units per gross acre). The area is designated Residential Single Family
under Renton's Comprehensive Plan for which R-8 (eight dwelling units per net
acre)zoning is probable. He stated that the fiscal impact analysis indicates a
deficit of$3,009 at current development and a surplus of$4,429 at full
development. The one-time parks acquisition and development cost is
estimated at$33,102. He concluded that the proposed annexation is consistent
with City policies and Boundary Review Board objectives.
October 16,2006 Renton City Council Minutes Page 350
Noting that a portion of the site is being used as commercial and the property
directly adjacent to this portion is also commercial, Councilwoman Briere
indicated that it is logical for the commercial uses to line up. Mr. Erickson said
the site's zoning has to be consistent with the Comprehensive Plan, and pointed
out that a Comprehensive Plan amendment may be needed. He explained that
the commercial use can be grandfathered in if it currently is a legal use in King
County.
Public comment was invited.
Charles Grass, 10733 138th Ave. SE, Renton, 98059, stated that he is the
petitioner for the annexation, and suggested light commercial zoning along
Duvall Ave. NE given the substantial commercial activity directly across from
the site. He pointed out that residential properties on main streets such as
Duvall Ave. NE tend to become run down.
There being no further public comment, it was MOVED BY BRIERE,
SECONDED BY NELSON, COUNCIL CLOSE THE PUBLIC MEETING.
CARRIED.
MOVED BY BRIERE, SECONDED BY CLAWSON, COUNCIL ACCEPT
THE MARSHALL 10%NOTICE OF INTENT TO COMMENCE
ANNEXATION PROCEEDINGS PETITION, AUTHORIZE CIRCULATION
OF THE 60%DIRECT PETITION TO ANNEX FOR THE 7.6 ACRE AREA,
REQUIRE THAT PROPERTY OWNERS ASSUME A PROPORTIONAL
SHARE OF THE CITY'S OUTSTANDING VOTED INDEBTEDNESS,AND
ACCEPT ZONING CONSISTENT WITH THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN.
CARRIED.
ADMINISTRATIVE Chief Administrative Officer Jay Covington reviewed a written administrative
REPORT report summarizing the City's recent progress towards goals and work programs
adopted as part of its business plan for 2006 and beyond. Items noted included:
* Take part in the Cedar River"Salmon Trek" and learn about the life cycle of
salmon. Naturalists will be stationed at the downtown Renton Library,
Riverview Park,Cavanaugh Pond, and Landsburg Park from 11 a.m. to 4
p.m. on October 21, 22, 28, and 29, and November 4.
* The Renton Senior Activity Center's annual Craft Bazaar will be held on
October 28 from 10 a.m. to 4 p.m. The Bazaar will offer crafts handmade
by Renton area senior adults.
* The Renton Municipal Airport may experience an increase in nighttime
aircraft operations this week due to unforeseen construction delays causing
the closure of the main runway at Boeing Field.
AUDIENCE COMMENT Howard McOmber,475 Olympia Ave.NE, Renton, 98056,expressed his
Citizen Comment: McOmber- pleasure that the Highlands Zoning Task Force is working towards improving
Highlands Zoning Task Force the Highlands neighborhood. He noted the need for alley and sidewalk
improvements in the area, and an increased police presence.
Citizen Comment: Moore- Kirk Moore, 1901 Harrington Circle NE,Renton, 98056, indicated that he is the
Highlands Zoning Task Force chair of the Highlands Zoning Task Force. He reported that the task force has a
good understanding of the situation in the Highlands, and he thanked Economic
Development,Neighborhoods and Strategic Planning Department staff for their
assistance. Mr. Moore reviewed the issues the task force is tackling, and he
predicted that the task force will produce positive recommendations that meet
the goals for the area.
October 16,2006 Renton City Council Minutes Page 351
In response to Council President Corman's question, Mr. Moore confirmed that
there is good participation from all members of the task force. He pointed out
that the task force is concentrating on moving forward and not on living in the
past.
Citizen Comment: Curley- Pam Curley, 1225 Kirkland Ave. NE, Renton, 98056, noted that the police have
Waiver of Water-Related been called numerous times regarding the tenant in her duplex. She reported a
Charge situation whereby her tenant illegally turned the water on, and when she
reported this to the Utility Billing Division, she was charged $170. Ms. Curley
explained that she cannot afford to pay the charge. She stressed that she should
not be chastised for reporting her tenant's actions, and asked for waiver of the
charge.
Police Chief Milosevich stated that the Police Department is familiar with the
problems Ms. Curley is having with her tenant and is trying to help resolve the
issue. He pointed out that the eviction process has begun; however, the process
can take a long time. Chief Administrative Officer Covington reviewed Ms.
Curley's situation in regards to the water-related charge and noted that the only
way the charge can be waived is by legislative action.
MOVED BY PERSSON, SECONDED BY NELSON, COUNCIL REFER
THIS MATTER TO THE FINANCE COMMITTEE. CARRIED.
CONSENT AGENDA Items on the consent agenda are adopted by one motion which follows the
listing.
Council Meeting Minutes of Approval of Council meeting minutes of 10/9/2006. Council concur.
10/9/2006
City Clerk: Quarterly Contract City Clerk submitted Quarterly Contract List for period of 7/1/2006 to
List, 7/1/2006 to 9/30/2006 9/30/2006; 62 contracts and 17 addenda totaling$24,392,293.94. Information.
CAG: 06-168, Coulon Beach City Clerk reported bid opening on 10/10/2006 for CAG-06-168, Coulon Beach
Log Boom& Transient Log Boom and Transient Moorage Repair; four bids; engineer's estimate
Moorage Repair, Richard $105,000; and submitted staff recommendation to award the contract to low
Phillips Marine bidder, Richard Phillips Marine, Inc., in the amount of$69,6'32. Council
concur.
Finance: Impact Fees, Issaquah Economic Development, Neighborhoods and Strategic Planning Department
&Kent School Districts recommended approval to increase the impact fee collected on behalf of the
Issaquah School District, and approval to implement an impact fee to be
collected on behalf of the Kent School District. Refer to Finance Committee;
set public hearing on 11/20/2006.
Budget: 2007, Annual City of Finance and Information Services Department recommended a public hearing
Renton be set on 11/6/2006 to consider the 2007 Revenue Sources and Preliminary
Budget, and a public hearing be set on 12/4/2006 to consider the 2007 Budget.
Refer to Committee of the Whole; set public hearings.
Plat: West Coast, NE 4th St, Hearing Examiner recommended approval, with conditions, of the West Coast
PP-04-149 Preliminary Plat; 60 single-family lots on 10.82 acres located at 4925 NE 4th St.
Council concur.
MOVED BY CORMAN, SECONDED BY NELSON, COUNCIL APPROVE
THE CONSENT AGENDA AS PRESENTED. CARRIED.
4
October 16,2006 Renton City Council Minutes Page 352
UNFINISHED BUSINESS Council President Corman presented a Committee of the Whole report
Committee of the Whole regarding the Springbrook Trail missing link. The Springbrook Trail,first
Community Services: identified as the "Springbrook Valley Trail" in the City of Renton Trails Master
Springbrook Trail Missing Plan,was adopted as part of the Comprehensive Parks, Recreation, and Open
Link Space Plan in 1993. This trail is a north/south route and generally follows the
Springbrook Creek from the City limits at SW 43rd St. north to the Black River
Riparian Forest, and connects to a much larger trail system with access to the
cities of Pacific and Seattle.
The Springbrook Trail missing link was bid as part of the Springbrook Creek
Wetland and Habitat Mitigation Bank Project located on 130 acres of City-
owned property. The engineer's estimate for trail construction was $1,599,997
with the low bid coming in at$646,398. The City has sufficient funds to cover
the cost of construction,including a 10 percent contingency for a total of
$711,038 from the Community Development Impact Mitigation Fund.
The Committee recommended approval to fund construction of the Springbrook
Trail in the amount of$711,038 from the Community Development Impact
Mitigation Fund(Fund 303) and further authorizes trail construction. MOVED
BY CORMAN, SECONDED BY LAW,COUNCIL CONCUR IN THE
COMMITTEE REPORT. CARRIED.
Finance Committee Finance Committee Chair Persson presented a report recommending Council
Finance: Water Bill approve an extended water bill adjustment for a period of 12 months,which
Adjustment,Harris/Reeves equals compensation in the amount of$1,162.25, for a water service line leak to
a single-family dwelling at 2313 SE 8th Dr. This residence is located in the
Falcon Ridge Development, which has some unusual and extraordinary
circumstances as follows:
• Development Standards in 1986 for the Falcon Ridge Planned Unit
Development did not require the developer to install each water meter in
front of the subject property.
• A private water service line was installed under and across neighboring
properties,driveways, and ditch lines making the leak difficult to find and
to repair.
• The owner went through extraordinary effort to find the leak as documented
by hiring professionals to locate the leak, due to the unusual location of the
service line on the adjacent property.
• The owner had to relocate the meter and replace the water service line.
MOVED BY PERSSON, SECONDED BY LAW,COUNCIL CONCUR IN
THE COMMITTEE REPORT. CARRIED.
Community Services Community Services Committee Chair Nelson presented a report
Committee recommending concurrence in the staff recommendation to approve Mayor
Appointment: Municipal Arts Keolker's appointment of Patricia Riggs to the Municipal Arts Commission for
Commission an unexpired term expiring 12/31/2007. MOVED BY NELSON, SECONDED
BY PALMER, COUNCIL CONCUR IN THE COMMITTEE REPORT.
CARRIED. Councilwoman Nelson introduced Ms. Riggs, who was present in
the audience.
RESOLUTIONS AND The following ordinances were presented for second and final reading and
ORDINANCES adoption:
October 16. 2006 Renton City Council Minutes Page 353
Ordinance#5223 An ordinance was read.annexing approximately 24 acres of property generally
Annexation: Querin II, located south of NE Sunset Blvd. and north of SE 114th St., if extended, east of
Hoquiam Ave NE 141st Ave. SE, if extended, and west of 144th Ave. SE, if extended (Querin II
Annexation). MOVED BY BRIERE, SECONDED BY CLAWSON,
COUNCIL ADOPT THE ORDINANCE AS READ. ROLL CALL: ALL
AYES. CARRIED.
Ordinance#5224 An ordinance was read establishing the zoning classification for approximately
Annexation: Querin 11, R-4 10.70 acres, generally located in the portion north of SE 112th St., if extended,
Zoning east of 142nd Ave. SE, and south of NE Sunset Blvd., annexed within the City
of Renton from R-4 (Urban Residential - four dwelling units per acre, King
County zoning) to R-4 (four dwelling units per net acre)zoning; Querin II
Annexation. MOVED BY BRIERE, SECONDED BY CLAWSON, COUNCIL
ADOPT THE ORDINANCE AS READ. ROLL CALL: ALL AYES.
CARRIED.
Ordinance#5225 An ordinance was read establishing the zoning classification for approximately
Annexation: Querin II, R-8 12.35 acres, generally located in that portion west of 142nd Ave. SE and that
Zoning portion south of SE 112th St., if extended, annexed within the City of Renton
from R-4 (Urban Residential - four dwelling units per acre, King County
zoning) to R-8 (eight dwelling units per net acre) zoning; Querin II Annexation.
MOVED BY CLAWSON, SECONDED BY BRIERE, COUNCIL ADOPT
THE ORDINANCE AS READ. ROLL CALL: ALL AYES. CARRIED.
NEW BUSINESS Councilman Clawson expressed concerns about Initiative 933, which will be
AJLS: Initiative 933 before Washington state voters this November, and suggested scheduling a pro
(Government Regulation of and con discussion on the matter. Mayor Keolker stated that the matter is
Private Property) scheduled to be discussed at the next Council meeting, and resolutions will be
prepared in case Council decides to take a position on the initiative.
ADJOURNMENT MOVED BY LAW, SECONDED BY CORMAN, COUNCIL ADJOURN.
CARRIED. Time: 7:49 p.m.
Bonnie I. Walton, CMC, City Clerk
Recorder: Michele Neumann
October 16, 2006
RENTON CITY COUNCIL COMMITTEE MEETING CALENDAR
Office of the City Clerk
COUNCIL COMMITTEE MEETINGS SCHEDULED AT CITY COUNCIL MEETING
October 16, 2006
COMMITTEE/CHAIRMAN DATE/TIME AGENDA
COMMITTEE OF THE WHOLE MON., 10/23 Emerging Issues in Development;
(Colman) 5:30 p.m. Council Policies
*Council Conference Room*
Approximately 3rd Quarter Financial Report
6:45 p.m. *Council Chambers*
•
COMMUNITY SERVICES
(Nelson)
FINANCE MON., 10/23 Vouchers;
(Persson) 4:30 p.m. Lease with 5 Kwang Corporation for City
Hall Deli
PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT THURS., 10/19 CANCELLED
(Briere)
PUBLIC SAFETY
(Law)
TRANSPORTATION (AVIATION) WED., 10/18 Severing of Burlington Northern Santa Fe
(Palmer) 9 a.m. Railroad Track at Wilburton;
City Transportation Projects Update
(briefing only);
Regional Transportation Issues Update
(briefing only)
UTILITIES
(Clawson)
NOTE: Committee of the Whole meetings are held in the Council Chambers unless otherwise noted. All other committee meetings are held in the Council
Conference Room unless otherwise noted.
C.) O�
♦
1Nr-r0�
MARSHALL ANNEXATION PUBLIC MEETING
COUNCIL CONSIDERATION OF NOTICE OF INTENT TO COMMENCE
ANNEXATION PROCEEDINGS
October 16, 2006
The City is in receipt of a Notice of Intention to Commence Annexation Petition from property
owners in the proposed Marshall Annexation area representing more than 10% of the area's
$5,761,000 assessed value. Under RCW 35A.14.120, direct petitions to annex are initiated by
property owners representing either at least 10% of the annexation areas assessed value. The
King County Department of Assessments certified the signatures on the petition on September
22, 2006.
The 7.6-acre site is located in the City's Potential Annexation Area and is designated Residential
Single Family (RS) on the City's Comprehensive Plan Land Use Map. The site currently has
King County R-4 zoning, which allows up to six units per gross acre. It is likely the City will
'err rezone it R-8, eight units per net acre, consistent with the RS land use designation if the Council
authorizes circulation of a 60% Direct Petition to annex, applicants are successful in getting
sufficient signatures to have the petition certified, and Council decides to accept it.
The annexation site is surrounded completely by the City and is located adjacent and
immediately west of Duvall Avenue NE, just north of the commercial development at the
northwest corner of Duvall Avenue NE and NE Sunset Boulevard. Its western boundary is
Anacortes Avenue NE, if extended, and its northern boundary is NE 17th Street, if extended.
Council is required to hold tonight's public meeting with the applicants in order to decide
whether the City wishes to accept, reject or geographically modify the proposed annexation.
If the Council decides to accept the proposed annexation it will:
1. Authorize the circulation a 60% Direct Petition to Annex:
2. Decide whether to require the simultaneous adoption of proposed zoning consistent with
the Comprehensive Plan; and,
3. Decide whether to require property owners within the annexation area to assume their fair
share of the City's existing indebtedness.
Nr►
Meeting Handout 10-16-06.doc\
A.
. 1,
I
P; NE 2(-_-;PI ;t:', .:----=.',--,.it_
7 . .• '..--1
. .
4_
±,-1, „,,, ,:) ,,,,,,, ,_, , 2,,, ,,,. ,,,,,. I
/I
, ——1
,,':_e:l i 1
T--';, i L
-•,I M-•.' 24th. '-.1 'I'
.,-L.-II . . k... _ _ . i____ i,.. ..-, i,„,;;;_ ,:4';;•-'0!/-
..-. -.- Nr .5,-, r- -- 1,--- -------— ,
. . , .. ..,,); ,,,, _ Nt 2.7.:j 11. NI 2..'.;rd , • - I NE. 23,c
ti!-
(..:`IT_.Z..'rC Pi:N- 9-; ..,7-,I tf;,-:;•_Er: ; \', f,-? C'•(-., _____. __.. „' li
j-,
H \\ " Nr ;
" 22id '•>', ' c; t
.. ,, • :-
N
_ N':- 7)r:(1_(--,. t
- - — 1 ..;;;•,;; --,-.. , . ` ' --'-'-- --- --` NE "`-1---''''.."• _0'
-- !
."' 1 , . thr- - . - ',4-, : ..----,
C-' "4: '11 '' ' '-- i '- IT "
--- -,1.1,-; -2:-11,-- • __,
vt•; _ ,; ,4-D t 1 V I(41-• ----,4t--'-- '
;•,--;; 1! .., ..i) , ;'--'
,,_ • ,; ;,
,.:
._;- ,; ,' -•,- ; E_i
. - __ _ ;<, ,1 '• ----/ ; ; , •
,:2--- J,':'.-,..;I ', ,--ri ';•-:: -- _f 1 i._ --i7; : J 1 r- _---.
,
,----- '---- - — -_ _1 --,,--- --J //./ „i,./ N't 1,`,-1-.,;:;. -,;_i_i ;:;,= -'.- 1 --, .. ,;--.3„,
,1 • -•‘-',/•/ - -i
, 1
4
, <; . • f( Nr 1 hh_.--/. s itcht/ pi-, ;ti, 7-1.-,, , , ,„,, : .-
...........i.:-
I
d
—---- , •-•-. - ; '1' f!!--;
• . ,. . ,.. .. ..,.._.„....,--
rL.,I , -::-:•n •
: ‘, :- • , ,s‘±,e.-:----..---- f
\'• \"Ic'-
I --,! .„.. q...r • 1 '
-...
• - __.'-'
L_____ ._.I ..<1.,:: --1—I 'vE : ', 1 th
- • - __, —
..f: i
'''---'--7-- ' '
L. .., ,---• //'-)
ht --IN,. ,.., ; 1 I ' -'' -...- 31(!)
I-••, --. ! --- HE 1 ',.h f .•;r .,- '-'I • III
, ,•i, .' 1 I ',- ---- • ---; . ,
,, _ s,i- 1 •,•,-,,, ,--_,- ;, . . .
• . ...4._ 1,_.•,,, :1 •
__ _
St 1 12 .1 i ' 11•
1
. ,_•_
1, 1
: - - . - ----
-z I
.
;---
• ----- ----- ---- _i ' ---.
tt t• ,--,t . i I
N-4.1- ,`-ith l• 7i ,''-' .
1 -1
L-_v--,
,i
-i t - ' 1 I
s, (2.1:
'••,`•- - L
[ •t, I;„/;-' I I 1 t -, : I 'LI 1
1 , I- ) ,-”,; / .
,....; --,-,
- ._ _
-.. - h -'..r
•- .i LI 1-- f i •
1 5_i I
1 ----- -II„.. ----„--11 . 4 _
1
Proposed Marshall Annexation 0 800 1600
Vicinity Map ________---- t
.-r 1nt on,lk,e1.1pment.No ght,41-10...ds&Strait:pc Planninit 1 : 9600
I
•It --- City Limits
,,I..,...„.,,v,,,,::,;:,,,,„,,,r„,,,
Study Area
.___,..
*NS
Meeting Handout 10-16-06.doc1
•
• s Marshall Annexation
Public Meeting to Consider
10%Notice of Intent Petition
October 16,2006
City W flax, t ZIT*"** Pbio.NJ
arrant Annexations '
'• Background
r • 10%Notice of Intent petition submitted on
August 21,2006
•1
••...,"° s"`° ., IMCWri +tris;sem
{ - !� • Petition certified by King County on September
�.F t �'
� 12,2006
a&` • Tonight's public meeting held pursuant to state
. ,_ "titp.•r..a = i»•+..0 law—Council must meet within 60-days to
,°
.-V „c` '/ " r•s.G consider petition
Pa�,.O,` <
Background, continued Existing Conditions
• PAA-Within Renton's Potential Annexation Area
• Council must decide:
• Location—Northeast of the intersection of Duvall
—Whether to accept the 10%Notice of Intent Avenue NE and Sunset Blvd.NE
to Commence Annexation petition,reject it, • Size-+7.6 acres,including interior public and private
or modify it, and streets
—If it accepts the 10%Notice of Intent • Current Uses-26 single-family dwellings
petition,whether to authorize circulation of
• Boundaries—Surrounded by the City on all of its four
60%Direct Petition to Annex sides with Duvall Ave NE on its east and SE 106th St,if
extended on its north
1
Existing Conditions - Vicinity Existing Conditions
Site is west of j •Currently 26 single s -,
•Duvall Avenue NE family dwellings y %_ :}:
and north of NE on site •`,',,'''' .2.--•• •'„:',.y.•. _::,,-,,,-',,
Sunset Blvd. ' - My ..;,
•Potential of up to 43 ,.. ;,;,g " ;
•Site has been an single-family detached
unincorporated island -" units on site with
since mid-1970s _ possible R-8 zoning -
SITE
Vicinity Map Structures Map
Existing Conditions
• Site drains to HoneyExisting Conditions-Public Services
Creek via City _
facilities on Duvall ,'",, -'t, ' • Fire-Fire District 25 T-- '-
Avenue NE r',' t .=\"I
• No sensitive areas • Utilities
noted on site —Within Renton Water
a ''' - .;a:7.1 Utility Service Area `
—Within Renton Sewer 1
r 1
..ur< Utility Service Area
toe � • Schools �.
—Within Renton School
Topography Map ` t District :kt
Existing Conditions
• Public Works notes that: ,
•2005 County Surface Water Design Manual •
should be used at time of future development Ov`"
•Annual cost for surface water mitigation of .41
$1,809 per year .- '
• � x
.:*' . ,..,
to -
•Existing water mains are old and undersized and
need to be replaced tea'
•Estimated cost to provide 900'of 8"water line
is± $175,000
•Existing streets will need resurfacing to come up to
City standards
• Parks notes a deficiency of developed recreational View looking west along SE 107'"Place showing typical
opportunities in the area single-family housing along north side of street
2
r
County Comp Plan Land Use
-, Designation and Current Zoning
K.C.Land Use Map- h 4
gloo Urban Residential
4-12du/acre(gross)
la ..e .. ... .wE
ms NItIi
"1 K.C.Zoning- 'sem>
•
R-4, Residential 4 du/ac
(gross) Sunset Blvd
SITE •'
View looking north across SE 107'"Street showing County Zoning Map
mature mature tree canopy to the north
Renton Comp Plan Designation Fiscal Impact Analysis
and Probable Future Zoning
Renton Comp Plan Land tf I� „tk • General Fund cost and revenue
Use Designation implications
—Residential
Single-family rlf , —Assumes 26 existing single-family homes with average assessed value of$255,450
1,4
Probable Renton Zoning - —Assumes 17 new single-family homes with
—R-8, 8 du/acre(net) s+. average assessed value of$450,000
SITE
Renton Zoning
Fiscal Impact Analysis Relevant Annexation Policies
Policy LU-36.Encourage City water and sewer are
annexation where the available in Duvall Ave NE and
availability of infrastructure serve the area to the east. City
and services allow for urban provides fire services already.
densities.
Policy LU-37.The highest The proposed annexation area is
prionty areas for annexation an un-incorporated island,
should be those contiguous surrounded by the City
with the boundaries of the
City.
Policy LU-38. Support The subject site is within City's
annexations that would result PAA and Renton is the
in the future improvements to designated service provider.
City services or eliminate Area is now inefficiently serviced
duplication by service by King County.
Estimated one-time Parks Acquisition and Development Cost providers.
of$33,102
3
Relevant Boundary Review Board Objectives Conclusion
Preservation of natural Area is developed and part of an Preliminary analysis indicates that:
neighborhoods and established neighborhood which is
communities not being split • Proposed annexation generally is consistent with
City's Comp Plan annexation policies
Creation and preservation Renton currently provides fire
of logical service areas services to area and is the • Proposed boundaries generally consistent with
designated water and sewer service Boundary Review Board criteria
provider for this area
Prevention of abnormally This annexation will create a more • R-8 zoning would be consistent with current
irregular boundaries normal eastern boundary for Comp Plan land use designation
Renton
• Revenue surplus at full development in+10 years
Incorporation or The subject site is designated
annexation to cities of urban and is located within the • Except for parks,streets,and water no major
unincorporated areas which City's PAA service issues identified
are urban in character
Recommendation:
The Administration recommends that Council: _
• Accept the 10%Notice of Intent to Commence �.
Annexation Proceedings petition t r
• Authorize the circulation of the 60%Direct Petition
to annex for the 7.6 acre area
• Require that property owners within the proposed
annexation area assume a proportional share of the
City's outstanding voted indebtedness and accept
zoning consistent with the Comprehensive Plan '
4
a" �� ADMINISTRATIVE, JUDICIAL, AND
• , LEGAL SERVICES DEPARTMENT
T�� MEMORANDUM
DATE: October 16, 2006
TO: Randy Corman, Council President
Members of the Renton City Council
FROM: Kathy Keolker, Mayor
Jay Covington, Chief Administrative Officer
SUBJECT: Administrative Report
In addition to our day-to-day activities, the following items are worthy of note for this week:
COMMUNITY SERVICES DEPARTMENT
• Everyone is welcome to take part in the Cedar River "Salmon Trek" and learn about the
life cycle of our salmon. Naturalists will be stationed at the downtown Renton Library,
Riverview Park, Cavanaugh Pond, and Landsburg Park from 11:00 a.m. to 4:00 p.m. October
21st, 22nd, 28th, and 29th, and November 4th.
• Get a jump on that holiday shopping list at the Renton Senior Activity Center's annual Craft
Bazaar on Saturday, October 28th, from 10:00 a.m. to 4:00 p.m. at the Senior Center. The
Bazaar will offer crafts handmade by Renton area senior adults.
• Children 8 years of age and under(with parent or guardian) are invited to join in the fun at
the Boo Carnival on Saturday, October 28th from 10:00 a.m. to 12:30 p.m. at the Renton
Community Center. Crafts, games, and inflatables (sponsored by Stoneway Concrete) will
be on hand to amuse and delight young minds. Carnival pass for all activities is $6.00.
Concessions will also be available for purchase. Don't forget your camera!
• The Recreation Division has begun youth basketball registration for boys and girls in grades
1 through 10. Each year this program serves nearly 900 Renton area youth. For more
information on how to register, call 425.430.6700 or visit the City's website at
www.rentonwa.gov.
ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT, NEIGHBORHOODS & STRATEGIC
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
• Suzanne Estey assumed her new role as the City's Economic Development Director today.
Under the direction of department administrator Alex Pietsch, Estey will work to support
existing businesses, encourage new business and economic activity in the city, and foster
ongoing development projects. Additionally, Estey will oversee Renton's successful
neighborhood program and coordinate federal legislative activities for the City.
f
CITY OF RENTON COUNCIL AGENDA BILL
AI#: d r k"`' r
Iiiie Submitting Data: For Agenda of: 10/16/2006
Dept/Div/Board.. AJLS/City Clerk
Staff Contact Bonnie Walton, x6502 Agenda Status
Consent X
Subject: Public Hearing..
City of Renton Contracts List Correspondence..
Third Quarter 2006 Ordinance
Resolution
Old Business
Exhibits: New Business
List of contracts and addenda signed from July 1, 2006 Study Sessions
through September 30, 2006 Information X
Recommended Action: Approvals:
Legal Dept
None; Information only Finance Dept
Other
Fiscal Impact: N/A
Expenditure Required... Transfer/Amendment
LiAmount Budgeted Revenue Generated
Total Project Budget City Share Total Project..
SUMMARY OF ACTION:
The contract list shows all agreements executed between the City and outside parties and/or
agencies during the third quarter of 2006. There were 62 contracts and 17 addenda, totaling
$24,392,293.94
(„
(
k.
3rd Quarter 2006 z
CONTRACT ADDENDUM/ CONTRACT APPROVAL EXPIRATION Auto
NUMBER EXTENSION NAME/TITLE J AMOUNT PURPOSE DATE DIV DATE Renewal EXPIRATION DATE COMMENTS
KC Transportation Road
CAG-02-134 Adden#4-06 'Services Division 33,644.20'Landsburg Gravel Supplementation Mitigation Project 7/14/2006 U Undefined _ _
'Urban&Community Forestry Strategic Plan tree inventory-
CAG-03-018: Adden#4-06 Susan Black&Associates N/A i Time of completion extended to 12/31/2006 9/5/2006 PA 12/31/2006
[Design Contract for SW 27th St/Strander Blvd Connection
CAG-03-033 , Adden#4-06 Perteet,Inc. 855,000.00Project_Phase 1,Segment 2A 8/24/2006 T 12/31/2007
CAG-03-142 Adden#1-06 H.W.Lochner,Inc. 10,809.79 INE 4th St/Hoquiam Ave NE Signal Design-Additional work 1 9/3/2006 T 10/30/2006
Whitworth Pest Solutions, Provide Mosquito larvicide to City-owned ponds and catch
CAG-05-059 I Adden#3-06 'Inc. 24,480.00'basins 7/12/2006 U 12/31/2006
Pacific Groundwater Group,
CAG-05-108 Adden#1-06 Inc. 14,940.001Groundwater Level Trend Evaluation-Additional work 8/14/2006 U 12/31/2006
'Scott's Electric Service,
CAG-05-164 'LLC 239,244.77iHenry Moses Aquatic Center Lighting Improvements 7/21/2006 PA ' 10/21/2006 90 working days from date of commencement
Flag Construction Company,
CAG-05-194 ,Inc. 163,989.00 Jtenton Community Center Storag_e Room Additions 8/3/2006 PA 2/2/2007 120 working days from date of commencement
.Financial Consulting Water,Wasterwater,Surface Water Comp.Rate Study and
CAG-06-007 Adden#2-06 Solutions Group,Inc. 13,005.00 System Development Charges Study additional work. 9/5/20.06 U 12/31/2006
Blumen Consulting Group, ,Boeing Renton Plant Sub-District 1 Consistency Analysis
CAG-06-009. Adden#2-06 Inc. N/A Appeal Hea ring Prep($30,000 paid for by THL) 8/9/200.6 ED 1.2/31/200.6
Complete within 90 days from date of
CAG-06-025 - C.A.Carey Corporation 478,186.88'Renton Airport-Security Gate Replacement Phase II 7/25/2006 A Undefined commencement
Eastside Transportation Annual Fee is$500;a fully signed copy will
CAG-06-032 Partnership 500.00Sity's Membership in Eastside Forum on Transportation Issues 8/9/2006 T 12/31/200.8 not be retumed to City
South County Area ,City's Membership in South County Area Transportation Board Annual Fee is$75;a fully signed copy will not
CAG-06-033 ' Transportation Board . 75.00 Dion Transportation Issues 8/10/2006.. T 12/31/2008. be returned to City __
UW Office of Regional-Affairs& °Storefront Studio'Facade Improvement project in
College of Architecture&Urban
CAG-06-055 ptannino N/A;Downtown Renton-time extension to 9/30/2006 8/2/2006 ED 9/30/2006
Phinney Bischoff Design Create EDNSP website-Increase money and extend timeline
C AG-06-058House 4,000.00jto 9/31/2006 8/14/2006. E_D ' 9/30/2006 _
WA Department of 'Title VI Non-Discrimination Agreement for Populations Under
CAG-06-061 Transportation N/A 100,000 7/17/2.006 T Undefined
Complete 410 calendar after project execution
CAG-06-068 Ceccanti,Inc. 19,44.3,826.60 South Lake Washington Roadway Improvements Project 7/7/2006 T Undefined - date
Berger/Abam Engineers, Evaluation of the Kennydale Swimming Pier and Log Boom
CAG-06-073 Inc. N/A project-time extension to 9/24/2006 7/17/2006 PA 9/24/2006
I-1./City Clerk/Contract Log 2006.xis Page 1 10/5,2006
3rd Quarter 2006
CONTRACT ADDENDUM/ CONTRACT APPROVAL EXPIRATION Auto
NUMBER EXTENSION NAME/TITLE AMOUNT PURPOSE DATE DIV DATE Renewal EXPIRATION DATE COMMENTS
Flooding analysis of Ron Regis Park-time extension to
CAG-06-074 Adden#1-06 Parametrix,Inc. N/A'11/28/2006 _ 7/18/2006 PA 11/28/2006 _
Study amended to provide construction specifications,payment increase of
CAG-06-074 , Adden#2-06 Parametrix,Inc. 10,395.88'$10,395.88,and time extension of 243 calendar days. 9/25/2006 PA 5/26/2007 243 calendar days from Notice to Proceed date
Completed within 30 calendar days from
CAG-06-090 Mike's Roofing,Inc 47,980.80Liberty Park Community Building Roof Replacement 9/11/2006 PA 10/11/2006 Notice to Proceed
CAG-06-091 City of Tacoma N/A Interlocal Purchasing Agreement with the City of Tacoma 7/10/2006 F Undefined
'Completed within 70 working days from date
CAG-06-092 Westem Asphalt,Inc. 1,048,553.89'2006 Street Overlay with Curb Ramps 8/9/2006 T 10/18/2006 of commencement
Assist City of Renton in matters relating to the licensing&enforcement of Effective 1 year from date of execution,annual auto
CAG-06-098 King County N/A'laws/regulations of taxicabs&for-hire vehicles/drivers 7/6/2006 POL Undefined Y renewal unless terminated by 60 days written notice
KC Department of Implement City of Renton and State of WA Commute Trip
CAG-06-102 ' Transportat ion 38,060.0.0_,Reduction(CTR)for 2006-2007. 7/7/2.006 T 7/31/200.7 May be extended if agreed upon by both panics
Accept State Pedestrian&Bicycle Safety Program Grant
CAG-06-103 WA Transportation N/A Funds of$200,000 for S.3rd St at Shattuck Av S. 7/27/2006 T Undefined City's match is$45,000 for 2006;$100,000 total
FEMA Emergency Management Performance Grant(EMPG)
CAG-06-105 WA State Military Dept. N/A to supplement OEM budget. $35,469 7/6/20.06 F _ 12/31/2006
ILA 2006-2007 Waste Reduction&Recycling Grant
CAG-06-107 KC Solid Waste Division N/A Agreement(2006=$102,274;2007=$102,274) 7/27/2006 U 12/31/2007
CAG-06-108 NETServices,LLC 135,449.81 Driving Range Netting Replacement Project 8/25/2006 PA 9/2.5/2006 _30 days from date of commencement
Federal Aviation Grant Acceptance Documents for the Security Gate Replacement at
CAG-06-112 Adden#1-06 Administration N/A Renton Municipal Airport Project 7/12/2006 A Undefined_
King County Housing& :2006 Community Development Block Grant;City will expend Termination date specified in each Protect/Program
_ CAG-06-113 Community Development N/A$324,885&receive reimbursement from King County of same 7/7/2006 HS Undefined Exhibit
'Enhancement Grant funding of$500,000 for Lake WA Trail
CAG-06-114 WA Transportation N/A South Lake Connector Project 7/27/2006 T Undefined
WA State Traffic Safety City's match+WTSC Grant funding of$52,500 for the School
CAG-06-115 Commission 37,000.00 Zone Flashing Lighting Project 7/17/2006 T Undefined
Alexa Milton Interior Provide design services for exterior paint on Maplewood Golf Course
CAG-06-121 Adden#1-06 Design N/A Clubhouse&Driving Range-time extension to 12/30/2006 9/26/2006 PA 12/30/2.006
Dennis R.Craig
Complete within 60 working days from date of
CAG-06-124 ;Construction 363,823.15.2006 Citywide Sidewalk Project 8/15/2006 T 10/16/2006 commencement
Grant funding agreement for the Pedestrian/Bicyclist Rainier
CAG-06-125 WA Transportation N/A Ave(SR 167)S 4th St to S 2nd St Improvement Project 7/26/2006 T Undefined
FUCity Clerk/Contract Log 2006.xis Page 2 105'2006
t
(
(,,,,
1.
3rd Quarter 2006
CONTRACT ADDENDUM/ CONTRACT APPROVAL EXPIRATION Auto
NUMBER _ EXTENSION NAME/TI LE AMOUNT PURPOSE DATE DIV DATE Renewal EXPIRATION DATE COMMENTS
Grant funding agreement for the SR 900-Hardie Ave SW to '
CAG-06-126 WA Transportation_ N/A•Rainier Av Improvement Project 7/26/2006 T ' Undefined
CAG-06-129 Pravda Studios,Inc. 50,000.00'Video production services for marketing campaign _ 7/7/2006 ED_ 9/30/2006
•
,Airport Seaplane Base Dredging&Shoreline Mitigation
CAG-06-130 ;Parametrix,Inc. 139,500.00 Project 7/12/2006 A 1/31/2008
Application of water leak-sealing material on exterior wall of
CAG-06-131 Leewens Corp. 18,546.04 the Airport's control tower. 7/11/2006 A 12/31/2006 Completed within 30 days
CAG-06-132 Doug Pederson&Assoc. _ 24,000.00 Economic Research Services for the Finance Department 7/14/2006 FIS 5/31/2008
CAG-06-133 PACE Engineers,Inc. 8,780.00 Survey of Production and Monitoring Wells 7/12/2006 U 8/1/2006
The American Red Cross& Joint Agreement and Memorandum or Understanding Automatic annual renewal for additional 1 year penod
CAG-06-134 KC Fire Dist.#25 N/A Concern inp the Disaster Relief Supply Building and Supplies 7/20/2006 PA Undefined Y unless terminated by any party with 60 days notice
McClincy's Home Complete within 60 calendar days from date of
CAG-06-135 Decorating 14,732.64 Exterior Door Replacement at Maplewood Golf Course 7/19/2006 PA 12/30/2006 .commencement
McClincy's Home Exterior Door Replacement at Maplewood Golf Course-time
CAG-06-135 Adden#1-06 Decorating N/A extension to 12/30/2006 9/26/2006 PA 12/30/2006
•Hanson Professional Add documentation for one SARA facility to Fire Department City reimbursed by WA State grant#E06-207(CAG-06.
CAG-06-136 Services,Inc. 5,400.00 Hazm_at planning CD State of WA E06-207 Pass through grant 7/26/2006 F 9/30/2006 040)
Clover Creek Homeowner's
CAG-06-137 Association 2,722.00 Landscape public right-of-way along Lake Washington Blvd N 8,3,2006 ED 12/17/2006
Talbot Hill Neighborhood Landscape entrance on public right-of-way located along the
CAG-06-138 Association 2,165.00 SW corner of SR 515 and S 16th Av 8/3/2006 ED 12/17/200.6
Heritage Garden Estates Landscape entrance and outside retention pond located on
CAG-06-139 Homeowner's Association 7,225.00 Beacon Way. 8/3/20.06 ED 12_/17/200_6
Pacific Construction Completed within 60 calendars from date of
_ CAG-06-140 Systems,Inc. _ 20,555,58 Municipal Courts Floor Security Re-Model 8/2/2006 PA 10/2/2006 commencement
May Creek Bank Stabilization:Edmonds Avenue Storm
CAG-06-141 Fury Construction,LLC 139,060.00 Replacement Project SWP-27-3037 9/25/2006 U 10/25/2006 -
Communities in Schools of
CAG-06-142 Renton 7,180.00 2006 CDBG Contract for Family Liaison Svcs 8/3/2006 HS 12/31/2006
Visiting Nurse Services of 2006 CDBG Contract for Health Assessments/Senior Health
CAG-06-143 the Northwest 7,180.00 Promotion 8/3/2006 HS 12/31/2006
CAG-06-144 ElderHealth Northwest 7,176.00 2006 CDBG Contract for Adult Day Health 8/3/2006 HS 12/31/2006
St(Cny Clerk7Contsact Log 2006 xis Page 3 10/5(2006
3rd Quarter 2006
CONTRACT ADDENDUM! CONTRACT APPROVAL EXPIRATION Auto
NUMBER EXTENSION NAME/TITLE AMOUNT PURPOSE DATE DIV DATE Renewal EXPIRATION DATE COMMENTS
Domestic Abuse Women's 2006 CDBG Contract for Domestic Violence Svcs and
CAG-06-145 'Network(DAWN) _ 7,910.00 Confidential Shelter 8/3/2006 HS 12/31/2006
Survey&Photo Control GPS Network for aerial and
CAG-06-146W. &H Pacific 37,684.68 topographical mapping 8/7/2006 U 10_/_7/2006 60 working days after photo session
Legislative Consulting Services for the 2007 Washington State
CAG-06-148 'Outcomes by Levy 53,200.00 Legislative Session 8/7/2006 ED Undefined Completion is end of 2007 Legislative Session
East Renton Plateau Survey regarding opinions about annexing':
CAG-06-150 PRR,Inc. 16,561.00 to the City of Renton 8/9/2006 ED 8/31/2006
CAG-06-151 PRR,Inc. 60,087.00 Renton Annexation Outreach efforts 8/9/2006 ED 12/31/2006
Structural and/or non-structural code compliance plan review
CAG-06-153 'Reid Middleton 50,000.00 for new and remodeled buildings. 8/11/2006 DS 12/31/2006 May be extended up to three years
Provide employment assistance for low and moderate income
CAG-06-154 Multi-Service Center 61,140.00 residents 8/11/2006 HS 12/31/2006
--i
CAG-06-155 GrouuHealth Cooperative 192,100.00 2006 Agreements for Group Health Medical Coverage 8/15/2006 HR Undefined :In effect until terminated by or renewed
Program of Seattle&King
CAG-06-156 Co. 9,345.00 2006 CDBG Contract for Emergency Food Services 8/14/2006 FIS 12/3.1/2006
Underground conversion of electical for Duvall Av NE
CAG-06-157 Adden#I-06 !Puget Sound Energy 898.00 Widening Project-Additional work 8/4/2006 T 8/15/2006
I-405 Cedar River Vicinity Charette Concept Letter of
CAG-06-158 WA Transportation N/A Concurrence 8/10/2006 T Undefined .
'Gary Merlino Construction
CAG-06-159 Co,Inc. 53,940.00 Renton Av S/S 3rd St Storm System Outfall Relocation 9/25/2006 U 10/31/2006
Consultant services to prepare the Parks&Recreation for 5-
.
CAG-06-160 Sylvia Allen 18,000.00 year accreditation 7/9/2006 PA 3/31/2007
Roth Hill Engineering
CAG-06-161 Partners,LLC 8,800.00 Earlington Sewer Interceptor;Permitting - 8/15/2006 U 12/31/2006
WA Transponarton;Army Corp of i Springbrook Creek Wetland&Habitat Mitigation Bank-
CAG-06-162 Engineers;WA Ecology N/A establishment,use,operation,&management 8/22/2006 U Permanent
Spnngbrook Creek Wetland&Habitat Mitigation Bank•outlines roles&responsibilities for
CAG-06-163 WA Transportation N/A devgs,construction,site moot..credit snare&banding 8/15/2006 U Permanent
CAG-06-166 Parametrix,Inc. 16,79.9.00 Bridge Load Rating Contract 9/1/2006 T 12/3.1/2006
Aero-Metric Inc.(formerly
CAG-06-167 known as Walker&Assoc.) 21,373.00 Aerial Mapping Phase II;Photography 9/7/2006 U 9/28/2006
H:/City Clerk.Contract Log 2006.xts Page 4 10/3:2006
(4- (to J
r
(
a
(
3rd Quarter 2006
CONTRACT 'ADDENDUM/ CONTRACT APPROVAL 1 EXPIRATION ' Auto •
NUMBER EXTENSION _ NAME/TITLE AMOUNT PURPOSE DATE DIV DATE Renewal EXPIRATION DATE COMMENTS
CAG-06-169 All Purpose Door Repair 14,5.2__6.23 Replace Clubhouse&Driving Range Door Hardware 9/18/2006 PA 10/18/200.6 30 days from commencement date
Skyway Water&Sewer
CAG-06-170 District N/A'A_greemen_t for Conveyance of Wastewater 9/18/2006 PWA Permanent 5.0 years
•
Community Health Centers
CAG-06-171 of King County 10,080.0012006 CDBG Contract for Dental Care 9/18/2006 HS 12/31/2006
'Surface Water Utility Storm and Surface Water Management
CAG-06-174 RW Beck,Inc. 248,671.001Plan 9/22/2006 U 12/31/2007
•
Pp Provide legal advice and assistance to the City concerning its
A
C G-06-175 Foster Peer PLLC 20,000.00 surface water right claim 9/26/200.6 PA Undefined
WSDOT&Cascade LandEstablish responsibilities re:implementation and reimburse the Cascade
CAG-06-176 Conservancy 32,000.00;Land Conservancy for its stewardship and management activities 9/27/2006 PWA Permanent _
Design of West Hill Pressure Reducing Valve Station and
CAG-06-177 ,PACE Engineers,Inc. 41,992.00 Water Main Improvements at Renton Airport 9/29/2006 U 3/15/2007
62 Contracts
17 Addenda 24,392,293.94
H./City Clerk/Contract Log 2006.xls Page 5 I0:5/2006
r
CITY OF RENTON COUNCIL AGENDA BILL
AI#: L- t
Submitting Data: For Agenda of:
Dept/Div/Board.. AJLS/City Clerk October 16, 2006
Staff Contact Bonnie Walton Agenda Status
Consent X
Subject: Public Hearing..
Bid opening on October 10, 2006, for CAG-06-168, Correspondence..
Coulon Beach Log Boom and Transient Moorage Ordinance
Repair Project Resolution
Old Business
Exhibits: New Business
Staff Recommendation Study Sessions
Bid Tabulation Sheet (four bids) Information
Recommended Action: Approvals:
Legal Dept
Council concur Finance Dept
Other
Fiscal Impact:
Expenditure Required... $69,632 Transfer/Amendment
Amount Budgeted $72,000 Revenue Generated
Total Project Budget City Share Total Project
SUMMARY OF ACTION:
Engineer's Estimate: $105,000
In accordance with Council procedure, bids submitted at the subject bid opening met the following
three criteria: There was more than one bid, the low bid was within the project budget, and there
were no irregularities.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
Accept the low bid submitted by Richard Phillips Marine, Inc. in the amount of$69,632.
kimo
I
•
\( 1(
COMMUNITY SERVICES DEPARTMENT
=
•
logaie
MEMORANDUM
DATE: October 11, 2006
TO: Bonnie Walton, City Clerk
CC: Leslie Betlach, Parks Director
FROM: Bill Rasmussen, Capital Project Coordinator v
SUBJECT: Coulon Beach Log Boom and Transient Moorage Repair
CAG-06-168
1. The project is to repair the log boom and the hinge system on the transient moorage
floats at Gene Coulon Memorial Park.
2. On October 10, 2006, bids were opened to repair the log boom and transient moorage
hinge system. Three sealed bids were received.
3. Project budget amount is $72,000 for construction. The project's base bid was
$69,632.00 and is within the remaining budget.
Nor, 4. The budget source is 316.000000.020.5940.0076.63.00001.
5. The low bid meets the City of Renton's bid requirements.
6. The engineer's estimate was $105,000 for the base bid.
7. Richard Phillips Marine, Inc.of Boring Oregon, is the low bidder.
8. I checked two references and they both gave Richard Phillips Marine Inc. good
recommendations for their work.
9. Council Concur
2005-151aa
..r
CITY OF RENTON
BID TABULATION SHEET
PROJECT: Coulon Beach Log Boom Repair and Transient Moorage Repair; CAG-06-168 *44400
DATE: October 10,2006
FORMS
BID
BIDDER Bid Triple Addenda Includes 8 8%Sales Tax
Bond Form 3
Epic Construction, LLC X X X Base Bid: $89,107.20
40 Lake Bellevue Dr., Suite 100 Deductive Bid Item A: $23,500.00
Bellevue, WA 98005 Deductive Bid Item B: $12,500.00
Douglas R. Zylstra
Global Diving& Salvage, Inc. X X X Base Bid: $88,641.70
3840 W. Marginal Way SW Deductive Bid Item A: $27,160.74
Seattle,WA 98106 Deductive Bid Item B: $20,432.92
Kyle Watson
Richard Phillips Marine, Inc. X X X Base Bid: $69,632.00
33002 SE Ryder Lane Deductive Bid Item A: $22,000.00
Boring,OR 97009-9564 Deductive Bid Item B: $11,000.00
Richard Phillips
Seaborn Pile Driving Co. X X 1 &2 Base Bid: $91,693.12
9311 SE 36th St.,#204 Deductive Bid Item A: $34,866.70
Mercer Island, WA 98040 Deductive Bid Item B: $21,625.02
Ted Burns NIS
ENGINEER'S ESTIMATE TOTAL: $105,000.00 Nod
LEGEND:
Forms.Triple Form:Non-Collusion Affidavit,Anti-Trust Claims,Minimum Wage
CITY OF RENTON COUNCIL AGENDA BILL
AI#: $£ 4
Submitting Data: For Agenda of:
Dept/Div/Board.. EDNSP October 16, 2006
Staff Contact Rebecca Lind (x 6588) Agenda Status
Consent
Subject: Public Hearing.. X
School District Impact Fees 2007 Correspondence..
Ordinance X
Resolution
Old Business
Exhibits: New Business X
Issue Paper Study Sessions
Draft Ordinance Information
Recommended Action: Approvals:
Refer to Finance Committee; Legal Dept X
Set public hearing on November 20, 2006 Finance Dept X
Other
Fiscal Impact:
Expenditure Required... $0 Transfer/Amendment
Amount Budgeted $0 Revenue Generated
Total Project Budget $0 City Share Total Project
SUMMARY OF ACTION:
Each year local school districts update their Capital Facilities Plans and ask local governments to
adopt the Capital Facilities Plan. Three school districts operate within the City of Renton Planning
Area. The City has been collecting impact fees on behalf of the Issaquah School District since 2000.
Last year, the Council approved the collection of the full amount requested by the Issaquah School
District: $5,115 for each new single family dwelling. For 2007 the Issaquah School District has
asked the City to collect an impact fee of$6,136 for each new single family dwelling built in the
District. The Kent School District has also asked for the City to collect a $4,928 impact fee on its
behalf for each new single family dwelling built in the District. At the present time, the only City
territory within the Kent School District is the City-owned land of the Springbrook watershed.
However, it is likely that adjacent land will annex to the City of Renton in 2007. This ordinance
would establish the necessary framework for the collection of an impact fee for the Kent School
District at that time.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
The Administration recommends that the City Council:
• Set a public hearing on November 20, 2006, to consider the adoption of the recommended impact
fees for the Issaquah and Kent School Districts; and
• Adopt the recommend impact fee of$6,136 for the Issaquah School District and $4,928 for
the Kent School District.
C:\DOCUME--I\MNeumann\LOCALS—I\Temp\impact fee agenda bill.doc
�(CY O ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT,
` 2i NEIGHBORHOODS, AND STRATEGIC
• PLANNING DEPARTMENT
4?t,
MEMORANDUM
DATE: October 3, 2006
TO: Randy Corman, Council President
Members of the Renton City Council
VIA: Kathy Keolker, Mayor
FROM: 4''! Alex Pietsch, Administrator :.
STAFF CONTACT: Rebecca Lind, x6588
SUBJECT: Issaquah and Kent School Districts Impact Fees
ISSUE:
• Should the City of Renton increase the school mitigation fee currently collected on
behalf of the Issaquah School District?
*ore • Should the City of Renton establish the necessary framework for the collection of an
impact fee on behalf of the Kent School District?
RECOMMENDATION:
• Collect the requested impact fee of$6,136 on behalf of the Issaquah School District.
• Amend Section 4-1-160 of the Development Regulations to allow the collection of an
impact fee of$4,928 on behalf of the Kent School District.
BACKGROUND SUMMARY:
In November 1999, the City adopted Ordinance No. 4804 which added a new section to
Title 4 entitled"School Impact Fees". This section authorized the City to collect school
impact fees for the Issaquah School District and provided for an annual review of the fee
structure. Last year the City Council approved the collection of a fee of$5,115 on behalf
of the Issaquah School District for each new single family dwelling built within the
District's boundaries. This year, the Issaquah School District has asked for an increase in
the fee to $6,136 based upon their Capital Facilities Plan. Their 2006-2011 Capital
Facilities Plan includes major improvements to school facilities that serve City of Renton
residents.
Until this year, the only school district within Renton's planning area that requested the
collection of an impact fee was Issaquah. Since it is likely that the City of Renton will
softyannex territory within the Kent School District in 2007, the Kent School District has
h:\ednsp\admin\financial incentives\impact fees\2006 impact fees\impact fee issue paper.doc
Randy Corman
Page 2 of 2
October 3,2006
asked the City to authorize collection of an impact fee. The requested impact fee is
$4,928 for each new single family dwelling built within the District's boundaries. The
District's 2006-2007—2011-2012 Capital Facilities Plan includes the addition of
classrooms to the High School that would serve future City of Renton residents.
Establishment of the necessary code language prior to annexation will allow the efficient
collection of impact fees as those portions of Renton's planning area within the District's
boundaries begin to annex into the City.
CONCLUSION:
The City should collect a$6,136 school impact fee on behalf of the Issaquah School
District. The City should also authorize the collection of a school impact fee on behalf of
the Kent School District in the amount of$4,928.
cc: Jay Covington
Rebecca Lind
h:\ednsp\admin\financial incentives\impact fees\2006 impact fees\impact fee issue paper.doc
CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON
ORDINANCE NO.
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON,
CHANGING THE IMPACT FEE COLLECTION ON BEHALF OF
THE SCHOOL DISTRICTS WITHIN THE CITY OF RENTON
FROM $5,115 PER NEW SINGLE FAMILY HOME TO $6,136 PER
NEW SINGLE FAMILY HOME IN THE ISSAQUAH SCHOOL
DISTRICT AND IMPLEMENTING AN IMPACT FEE OF $4,928
PER NEW SINGLE FAMILY HOME IN THE KENT SCHOOL
DISTRICT.
WHEREAS, under Section 4.1.160 of Chapter 1, Administration and
Enforcement, of Title IV (Development Regulations), of Ordinance No. 4260 known as
the"Revised and Compiled Ordinances of the City of Renton,"as amended, and the maps
and reports adopted in conjunction therewith, the City of Renton has heretofore collected
on behalf of the Issaquah School District an impact fee of$5,115 for each new single
Nr■►
family home built within the District's boundaries; and
WHEREAS, the Issaquah School District requested that the City of Renton adopt
the District's 2006 Capital Facilities Plan, which includes an increase in the impact fee
for new single-family homes to $6,136; and
WHEREAS, the City of Renton is likely to annex territory within the boundaries
of the Kent School District in 2007;and
WHEREAS, the Kent School District requested that the City of Renton adopt the
District's 2006-2007 — 2011-2012 Capital Facilities Plan, which includes an impact fee
for new single-family homes of$4,928;
NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RENTON,
WASHINGTON, DOES ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS:
SECTION 1. The following section entitled"School Impact Mitigation Fees"of
Chapter 1, Administration and Enforcement of Title IV(Development Regulations) of
Ordinance No. 4260 entitled"Revised and Compiled Ordinances of the City of Renton,
Washington"is hereby amended as follows:
4-1-160 SCHOOL IMPACT MITIGATION FEES:
A FINDINGS AND AUTHORITY:
The City Council of the City of Renton(the "Council")hereby finds and determines that
new growth and development in the City of Renton will create additional demand and
need for school facilities in the Issaquah School District, and the Council finds that new
growth and development should pay a proportionate share of the cost of new facilities
needed to serve the new growth and development.
Therefore,pursuant to Chapter 82.02 RCW, the Council adopts this Section to assess
school impact fees for the Issaquah School District and the Kent School District. The
provisions of this Section shall be liberally construed in order to carry out the purposes of
the Council in establishing the school impact fee program.
B DEFINITIONS:
The following words and terms shall have the following meanings for the purposes of this
Section, unless the context clearly requires otherwise. Terms otherwise not defined herein
shall be defined pursuant to RCW 82.02.090, or given their usual and customary
meaning.
1. "Capital Facilities Plan" means the District's Capital Facilities Plan adopted by the
School Board consisting of:
a. A forecast of future needs for school facilities based on the District's enrollment
projections;
b. The long-range construction and capital improvements projects of the District;
c. The schools under construction or expansion;
d. The proposed locations and capacities of expanded or new school facilities;
e. At least a six (6) year Financing Plan Component,updated as necessary to
maintain at least a six (6) year forecast period, for financing needed school facilities
within projected funding levels, and identifying sources of financing for such purposes,
including bond issues authorized by the voters and projected bond issues not yet
authorized by the voters; and
f. Any other long-range projects planned by the District.
2. "City" means the City of Renton, King County, Washington.
3. "Classrooms" means educational facilities of the District required to house
students for its basic educational program. The classrooms are those facilities the District
determines are necessary to best serve its student population. Specialized facilities as
identified by the District, including but not limited to gymnasiums, cafeterias, libraries,
administrative offices, and child care centers, shall not be counted as classrooms.
4. "Construction Cost Per Student" means the estimated cost of construction of a
permanent school facility in the District for the grade span of school to be provided, as a
function of the District's design standard per grade span and taking into account the
requirements of students with special needs.
5. "Design Standard" means the space required, by grade span, and taking into
account the requirements of students with special needs, which is needed in order to
fulfill the educational goals of the District as identified in the District's Capital Facilities
Plan.
6. "Developer" means the person or entity who owns or holds purchase options or
other development control over property for which development activity is proposed.
7. "Development Activity" means any residential construction or expansion of a
building, structure or use; any change in use of a building or structure; or any change in
the use of land that creates additional demand for school facilities.
8. "District" means School District and-refers to either the Issaquah School District
No. 411, King County, Washington or the Kent School District No. 415, King County,
Washington.
9. "Elderly" means a person aged sixty two (62) or older.
10. "Encumbered"means to reserve, set aside, or otherwise earmark the impact fees
in order to pay for commitments, contractual obligations, or other liabilities incurred for
public facilities.
11. "Fee Schedule" means the schedule set forth as Attachment B to Ordinance 4808
indicating the standard fee amount per dwelling unit that shall be paid as a condition of
residential development within the City.
12. "Grade Span" means the categories into which a District groups its grades of
students, i.e., elementary school, middle or junior high school, and high school.
13. "Interlocal Agreement" means the interlocal agreement by and between the City
of Renton and the Issaq School-District as authorized in subsection I of this Section.
14. "Permanent Facilities" means the facilities of the District with a fixed foundation
which are not relocatable facilities.
15. "Relocatable Facility" means any factory-built structure, transportable in one or
more sections, that is designed to be used as an education space and is needed to prevent
the overbuilding of school facilities to meet the needs of service areas within the District,
or to cover the gap between the time that families move into new residential
developments and the date that construction is completed on permanent school facilities.
16. "Relocatable Facilities Cost Per Student" means the estimated cost of purchasing
and siting a relocatable facility in the District for the grade span of school to be provided,
as a function of the District's design standard per grade span, and taking into account the
requirements of students with special needs.
17. "Site Cost Per Student" means the estimated cost of a site in the District for the
grade span of school to be provided, as a function of the District's design standard per
grade span, and taking into account the requirements of students with special needs.
18. "Standard of Service" means the standard adopted by the District which identifies
the program year, the class size by grade span, and taking into account the requirements
of students with special needs, the number of classrooms, the types of facilities the
District believes will best serve its student population, and other factors as identified by
the District. The District's standard of service shall not be adjusted for any portion of the
classrooms housed in relocatable facilities which are used as transitional facilities or for
any specialized facilities housed in relocatable facilities. Except as otherwise defined by
the School Board pursuant to a Board resolution, "transitional facilities" shall mean those
facilities that are used to cover the time required for the construction of permanent
facilities; provided, that the District has the necessary financial commitments in place to
complete the permanent facilities called for in the Capital Facilities Plan.
19. "Student Factor" means the number derived by the District to describe how many
students of each grade span are expected to be generated by a dwelling unit. Student
factors shall be based on District records of average actual student generation rates for
new developments constructed over a period of not more than five (5) years prior to the
date of the fee calculation; provided, that if such information is not available in the
District, data from adjacent districts, districts with similar demographics, or countywide
averages may be used. Student factors must be separately determined for single family
and multi-family dwelling units, and for grade spans.
C IMPACT FEE PROGRAM ELEMENTS:
1. Impact fees will be assessed on all residential development activity in that portion
of the City located within the District's boundaries based on the provisions of subsection
E of this Section.
2. The impact fee imposed shall be reasonably related to the impact caused by the
development and shall not exceed a proportionate share of the cost of system
improvements that are reasonably related to the development.
3. The impact fee shall be based on a Capital Facilities Plan developed by the
District and approved by the School Board, and adopted by reference by the City as part
of the Capital Facilities Element of the City's Comprehensive Plan.
D FEE CALCULATIONS:
1. Separate fees shall be calculated for single family and multi-family dwelling
units, and separate student generation rates must be determined by the District for each `"
type of dwelling unit. For purposes of this Section, mobile homes shall be treated as
single family dwelling units and duplexes shall be treated as multi-family dwelling units.
2. The fee calculations shall be made on a district-wide basis to assure maximum
utilization of all school facilities in the District currently used for instructional purposes.
3. The formula in Attachment A to Ordinance 4808 provides a credit for the
anticipated tax contributions that would be made by the development based on historical
levels of voter support for bond issues in the District.
4. The District may provide a credit for school sites or facilities actually provided by
a developer which the District finds to be acceptable as provided for in subsection F of
this Section.
5. The City Council may adjust the fee calculated under this subsection, as it sees fit,
to take into account local conditions such as,but not limited to,price differentials
throughout the District in the cost of new housing, school occupancy levels, and the
percent of the District's Capital Facilities Budget, which will be expended locally. The
City Council establishes that fee alas the following fees:
a. . . . . •- .. - • •• , : - • Six thousand one hundred thirty-six-dollars
($5,115$6,136.00)per single family dwelling collected on behalf of the Issaquah
School District
b. Four thousand nine hundred twenty-eight dollars ($4,928.00)per single family
dwelling collected on behalf of the Kent School District;
(Ord. 5194, 1-23-2006)
E ASSESSMENT OF IMPACT FEES:
1. The City shall collect school impact fees, established by this Section as adjusted
from time to time, from any applicant seeking development approval from the City for
dwelling units located within the District's boundaries where such development activity
requires final plat or PUD approval or the issuance of a residential building permit or a
mobile home permit.
2. For a plat or PUD applied for on or after the effective date of Ordinance 4808, the
impact fees due on the plat or the PUD shall be assessed and collected from the applicant
when the building permit for each dwelling unit is issued, using the fee schedule in effect
when the plat or PUD receives preliminary approval. Residential developments proposed
for short plats shall not be governed by this subsection, but shall be governed by
subsection(E)(4) of this Section.
3. If, on the effective date of Ordinance 4808, a plat or PUD has already received
preliminary approval through King County, but then if any of the fee has been paid
through King County, the remainder of the impact fees shall be assessed and collected
from the lot owner at the time the building permits are issued, using the fee schedule then
in effect at the time of preliminary plat approval. If no payment was made through King
County, then the entire fee will be due and owing at the time building permits are issued.
If, on the effective date of Ordinance 4808, an applicant has applied for preliminary plat
or PUD approval, but has not yet received such approval, the applicant shall follow the
procedures set forth in subsection (E)(2) of this Section.
4. For existing lots or lots not covered by subsection B of this Section, applications
for single family, mobile home permits, and site plan approval for mobile home parks
proposed, the total amount of the impact fees shall be assessed and collected from the
Noisy
applicant when the building permit is issued, using the fee schedule then in effect.
Irrespective of the date that the application for a building permit or mobile home permit
or site plan approval was submitted, no approval shall be granted and no permit shall be
issued until the required school impact fees set forth in the fee schedule have been paid.
F EXEMPTIONS AND CREDITS:
1. The following shall be exempt from the application of impact fees:
a. Any form of housing exclusively for the elderly, including nursing homes and
retirement centers, so long as these uses are maintained in perpetuity and the necessary
covenants or declarations of restrictions are recorded on the property to ensure that no
children will reside in the development; or
b. The replacement of the same number of dwelling units at the same site or lot
when such replacement occurs within twelve (12) months of the demolition or destruction
of the prior structure; or
c. Alterations or expansion or enlargement or remodeling or rehabilitation or
conversion of an existing dwelling unit where no additional units are created and the use
is not changed; or
d. Any development activity that is exempt from the payment of an impact fee
pursuant to RCW 82.02.100, due to mitigation of the same system improvement under
the State Environmental Policy Act; or
e. Any development activity for which school impacts have been mitigated by the
payment of fees, dedication of land, or construction or improvement of school facilities
pursuant to a preliminary plat or PUD approval prior to the effective date of Ordinance
4808, unless the terms of the plat or PUD approval provide otherwise; or
f. Any development activity for which school impacts have been mitigated by the
payment of fees, dedication of land, or construction or improvement of school facilities
pursuant to a voluntary agreement entered into with the District prior to the effective date
of Ordinance 4808, unless the terms of the agreement provide otherwise.
2. Any credit shall be the responsibility of the District, and shall be independent of
the fees collected by the City. The burden of establishing such credit shall be on the party
seeking the credit. Proof under subsection (F)(3) of this Section shall include such things
as a receipt or cancelled check.
3. After the effective date of Ordinance 4808, and if the development activity is not
exempt from impact fees pursuant to subsection (F)(1)of this Section, the developer shall
receive a credit from the District for any payment made for the lot or development
activity in question, either as a condition of development approval or pursuant to the
terms of a voluntary mitigation agreement. The fee amount due on the development
activity shall be reduced by the amount of the credit.
4. After the effective date of Ordinance 4808, the developer can request that a credit
or credits be awarded by the District for the value of dedicated land, improvements, or
construction provided by the developer. The District shall first determine the general
suitability of the land, improvements, and/or construction for District purposes. Second,
the District shall determine whether the land, improvements, and/or the facility
constructed are included within the District's adopted Capital Facilities Plan or the Board
of Directors for the District may make the finding that such land, improvements, and/or
facilities would serve the goals and objectives of the Capital Facilities Plan of the
District. The District shall forward its determination to the City, including cases where
the District determines that the dedicated land, improvements, and/or construction are not
suitable for District purposes.
5. For each request for a credit or credits, if appropriate, the District shall select an
appraiser from a list of independent appraisers. The appraiser shall be directed to
determine for the District the value of the dedicated land, improvements, or construction
provided by the developer on a case-by-case basis. The developer shall pay for the cost of
the appraisal.
6. After receiving the appraisal, the District shall provide the developer with a letter
or certificate setting forth the dollar amount of the credit, the reason for the credit,where
applicable, the legal description of the site donated, and the legal description or other
adequate description of the project or development to which the credit may be applied.
The applicant must sign and date such letter or certificate indicating his/her agreement to
the terms of the letter or certificate, and return such signed document to the District
before the City will award the impact fee credit. The failure of the applicant to sign, date,
and return such document within sixty(60) calendar days shall nullify the credit.
7. Any claim for credit must be made no later than twenty(20) calendar days after
the submission of an application for a building permit.
G APPEALS AND INDEPENDENT CALCULATIONS:
1. After the City has collected fees under this Section, the District may adjust the
amount of the school impact fee assessed if one of the following circumstances exist;
provided, that the developer can demonstrate to the District's satisfaction that the discount
fails to ameliorate for the unfairness of the fee:
a. The developer demonstrates to the District's satisfaction that an impact fee
assessment was incorrectly assessed; or
b. Unusual and unique circumstances identified by the developer demonstrate that if
the standard impact fee amount were applied to the development, it would be unfair,
unjust or unlawful.
2. Requests for fee adjustments, and the administrative appeals process for the
appeal of an impact fee, shall follow the process for the appeal of the underlying
development application. The District shall provide staffing and legal assistance for such
an appeal consistent with the Interlocal Agreement between the City and the District, as
that Agreement may be amended from time to time.
3. A developer may provide studies and data to demonstrate that any particular
factor used by the District may not be appropriately applied to the development proposal,
but the District's data shall be presumed valid unless clearly demonstrated to be otherwise
by the developer. The developer shall pay for the cost of the studies and data, and must
demonstrate to the District's satisfaction that the discount fails to adjust for the error in
the fee
4. Any appeal of the decision of the Hearing Examiner with regard to fee amounts
shall follow the appeals process for the underlying development application and not be
subject to a separate appeal process. Any errors identified as a result of an appeal should
be referred to the Council for possible modification.
5. Impact fees may be paid under protest, in order to obtain a permit or other
approval of development activity.
H THE IMPACT FEE ACCOUNT, USES OF IMPACT FEES, AND
REFUNDS:
1. Impact fee receipts shall be initially deposited into a City fund created under
subsection L of this Section. When sufficient funds have accumulated to make transfer of
those funds to the District advisable, the Finance and Information Services Department
shall make such transfer. Such funds shall be transferred not less than quarterly, if the
balance in the fund is more than five thousand dollars ($5,000.00). Impact fee receipts
shall be earmarked specifically and retained in a special interest-bearing account
established by the District solely for the District's school impact fees as provided for in
subsection J of this Section. All interest shall be retained in the account and expended for
the purpose or purposes identified in subsection(H)(2) of this Section. Annually, the City
shall provide accounting records to the District and the District shall prepare a report on
school impact fees showing the source and amount of all monies collected, earned or
received, and capital or system improvements that were financed in whole or in part by
impact fees.
2. Impact fees for the District's system improvements shall be expended by the
District for capital improvements including but not limited to school planning; land
acquisition; site improvements; necessary off-site improvements; construction,
engineering, architectural,permitting, financing, and administrative expenses; relocatable
facilities, capital equipment pertaining to educational facilities; and any other expenses
which could be capitalized, and which are consistent with the District's Capital Facilities
Plan.
3. In the event that bonds or similar debt instruments are issued for the advanced
provision of capital facilities for which impact fees may be expended and where
1000
consistent with the provisions of the bond covenants, impact fees may be used to pay debt '
service on such bonds or similar debt instruments to the extent that the facilities or
improvements provided are consistent with the requirements of this Section.
4. School impact fees shall be expended or encumbered within six (6) years of
receipt, unless the Council identifies in written findings extraordinary and compelling
reason or reasons for the District to hold the fees beyond the six (6) year period. The
District may petition the Council for an extension of the six (6) year period and the
District set forth any such extraordinary or compelling reason or reasons in its petition.
Where the Council identifies the reason or reasons in written findings, the Council shall
establish the period of time within which the impact fees shall be expended or
encumbered, after consultation with the District.
5. The current owner of property on which an impact fee has been paid may receive
a refund of such fees if the impact fees have not been expended or encumbered within six
(6) years of receipt of the funds by the City, except as provided for in subsection(H)(4)
of this Section. In determining whether impact fees have been encumbered, impact fees
shall be considered encumbered on a first-in, first-out basis. The District shall notify
potential claimants by first-class mail deposited with the United States Postal Service
addressed to the owner of the property as shown in the King County property tax records.
6. An owner's request for a refund must be submitted to the City, in writing, within
one year of the date the right to claim the refund arises or the date that notice is given,
whichever date is later. Any impact fees that are not expended or encumbered within the
limitations in subsection(H)(4) of this Section, and for which no application for a refund
has been made within this one-year period, shall be retained and expended consistent 480.0
with the provisions of this Section. Refunds of impact fees shall include any interest
earned on the impact fees.
7. Should the City seek to terminate any or all school impact fee requirements, all
unexpended or unencumbered funds, including interest earned, shall be refunded to the
current owner of the property for which a school impact fee was paid. Upon the finding
that any or all fee requirements are to be terminated, the City shall place notice of such
termination and the availability of refunds in a newspaper of general circulation at least
two (2) times, and shall notify all potential claimants by first-class mail addressed to the
owner of the property as shown in the King County property tax records. All funds
available for refund shall be retained for a period of one year. At the end of one year, any
remaining funds shall be retained by the City,but must be expended for the District,
consistent with the provisions of this Section. The notice requirement set forth above
shall not apply if there are no unexpended or unencumbered balances within the account
or accounts being terminated.
8. A developer may request and shall receive a refund, including interest earned on
the impact fees, when:
a. The developer does not proceed to finalize the development activity as required
by statute or City Code or the Uniform Building Code, and
b. No impact on the District has resulted. "Impact" shall be deemed to include cases
where the District has expended or encumbered the impact fees in good faith prior to the
application for a refund. In the event that the District has expended or encumbered the
fees in good faith, no refund shall be forthcoming. However, if within a period of three
(3) years, the same or subsequent owner of the property proceeds with the same or
substantially similar development activity, the owner shall be eligible for a credit. The
owner must petition the City and provide receipts of impact fees paid by the owner for a
development of the same or substantially similar nature on the same property or some
portion thereof. The City shall determine whether to grant a credit, and such
determinations may be appealed by following the procedures set forth in subsection G of
this Section.
9. Interest due upon the refund of impact fees required by this Section shall be
calculated according to the average rate received by the City or the District on invested
funds throughout the period during which the fees were retained and paid by the
governmental entity controlling the funds and receiving the interest.
I INTERLOCAL AGREEMENT:
1. The Mayor is authorized to execute, on behalf of the City, an Interlocal
Agreement for the collection, expenditure, and reporting of school impact fees; provided,
that such Interlocal Agreement complies with the provisions of this Section.
2. The District shall establish a School Impact Fee Account with the Office of the
King County Treasurer, who serves as the Treasurer for the District. The Account shall
be an interest-bearing account, and the school impact fees received shall be prudently
invested in a manner consistent with the investment policies of the District.
3. For administrative convenience while processing the fee payments, school impact
fees may be initially deposited in the City accounts known as the "Issaquah School
District Impact Fee Fund," and the "Kent School District Impact Fee Fund,"with interest
earned retained by the District. As soon as advisable, the City shall deposit the school
Ikkooe
impact fees collected for the District in the District's School Impact Fee Account.
4. The City shall retain five percent (5%) of all fees collected to pay for its costs in
administering this Section.
J ADOPTION OF THE DISTRICT CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN AND
SUBMISSION OF THE ANNUAL UPDATES AND REPORT AND DATA:
1. The following Capital Facilities Plans are 2005 Capital Facilities Plan of the
District is hereby adopted by reference by the City as part of the Capital Facilities
Element of the City's Comprehensive Plan. (Ord. 5194, 1-23-2006)
a. The Issaquah School District No. 411 2006 Capital Facilities Plan
b. The Kent School District No. 415 2006-2007—2011-2012 Capital Facilities Plan
2. On an annual basis, the District shall submit the following materials to the City:
a. The annual update of the District's Capital Facilities Plan;
b. An updated fee calculation based on the formula in Attachment A to Ordinance
4808, and a revised fee schedule(Attachment B to Ordinance 4808); and
c. An annual report on the School Impact Fee Account, showing the source and
amount of all monies collected, earned, or received, and the public improvements that
were financed in whole or in part by impact fees.
K REVIEW:
The fee schedule established in this Section shall be reviewed and updated by the Council
on an annual basis after the Council receives the District's Plan and data required under
subsection J of this Section. The review may occur in conjunction with the annual update
err► of the Capital Facilities Element of the City's Comprehensive Plan.
ti
L SPECIAL FUND CREATED:
There is hereby created a-two special City funds known as the "Issaquah School District
,44101
Impact Fee Fund" and the"Kent School District Impact Fee Fund"into which all school
impact mitigation fees will be deposited.
M CITY NOT RESPONSIBLE:
The City will use its best efforts to collect such fees during its ordinary administrative
process, such fees as are due under this Section and consistent with the Interlocal
Agreement between the City and the District, as that Agreement may be amended from
time to time, but shall not be responsible to the District for failure to collect such fees.
N SEVERABILITY:
If any portion of this Section is found to be invalid or unenforceable for any reason, such
finding shall not affect the validity or enforceability of any other subsection of this
Section. (Ord. 4808, 11-1-1999)
SECTION II. This ordinance shall be effective upon its passage, approval and five days
after its publication.
PASSED BY THE CITY COUNCIL this day of
Bonnie Walton, City Clerk
APPROVED BY THE MAYOR this day of ,
Kathy Keolker-Wheeler, Mayor
Approved as to form:
Lawrence J. Warren, City Attorney
Date of Publication:
ORD.
CITY OF RENTON COUNCIL AGENDA BILL
AI#: / L
Submitting Data: For Agenda of: October 16, 2006
Dept/Div/Board.. Finance& IS Department
Staff Contact Michael E. Bailey, Agenda Status
Administrator, x6858
Consent X
Subject: Public Hearing.. X
Correspondence..
2007 Preliminary and Final Budget Ordinance
Resolution
Old Business
Exhibits: New Business
Study Sessions
Information
Recommended Action: Approvals:
• Refer to Committee of the Whole Legal Dept
• Set Public Hearing on 2007 Revenue Sources and Finance Dept X
Preliminary Budget for November 6, 2006 Other
• Set final Public Hearing on proposed 2007 Budget
for December 4, 2006
Fiscal Impact:
Narsol Expenditure Required... Transfer/Amendment
Amount Budgeted Revenue Generated
Total Project Budget City Share Total Project..
SUMMARY OF ACTION:
In compliance with RCW 35.33.051, the proposed 2007 Preliminary Budget will be submitted to
the Mayor, City Council, and City Clerk by November 1, 2006. This agenda bill sets the time and
place for two public hearings, November 6 and December 4, 2006.
The following Ordinances will be presented in November as part of the 2007 Budget public
hearing process:
1. 2007 Budget
2. 2007 Property Tax
3. Proposed Fees and Rate ordinances (prepared by departments implementing fees/rate
changes.)
STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
Set public hearing dates of November 6 and December 4, 2006,to consider the 2007 Budget, and
subsequently adopt the ordinances necessary to finalize the 2007 Budget.
C:\DOCUME.-I\BWalton\LOCAIS-1\Temp12007 Preliminary Budget Hearings_.doc
Y
CITY OF RENTON COUNCIL AGENDA BILL
I
AI#: 1 r p
Submitting Data: For Agenda of: 10/16/2006
Dept/Div/Board.. Hearing Examiner
Staff Contact Fred J. Kaufman, ext. 6515 Agenda Status
Consent X
Subject: Public Hearing..
Correspondence..
West Coast Preliminary Plat Ordinance
File No. LUA-04-149, ECF, PP Resolution
Old Business
Exhibits: New Business
Hearing Examiner's Report and Recommendation Study Sessions
Legal Description and Vicinity Map Information
Recommended Action: Approvals:
Legal Dept
Council Concur Finance Dept
Other
Fiscal Impact:
Expenditure Required... N/A Transfer/Amendment
Amount Budgeted Revenue Generated
Total Project Budget City Share Total Project
SUMMARY OF ACTION:
The hearing was held on August 29, 2006. The Hearing Examiner's Report and Recommendation on the
Honey Creek East Preliminary Plat was published on September 11, 2006. The appeal period ended on
September 25, 2006. No appeals were filed. The Examiner recommends approval of the proposed
preliminary plat subject to the conditions outlined on pages 7 & 8 of the Examiner's Report and
Recommendation. Conditions placed on this project are to be met at later stages of the platting process.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
Approve the West Coast Preliminary Plat with conditions as outlined in the Examiner's Report
and Recommendation.
1461
Rentonnet/agnbill/ bh
September 11, 2006
*me OFFICE OF THE HEARING EXAMINER
CITY OF RENTON
Minutes
APPLICANT/OWNER: CamWest West Coast LLC
9720 NE 120th Pl., Ste. 100
Kirkland, WA 98034
PROJECT NAME: West Coast Preliminary Plat
File No.: LUA 04-149, PP, ECF
LOCATION: 4925 NE 4`h Street(between Field and Hoquiam)
SUMMARY OF REQUEST: Approval for a 60-lot subdivision of a 10.82 -
acre site intended for the development of single-
family detached residences.
SUMMARY OF ACTION: Development Services Recommendation:
Approve subject to conditions
DEVELOPMENT SERVICES REPORT: The Development Services Report was received
by the Examiner on August 22,2006.
*two PUBLIC HEARING: After reviewing the Development Services
Report, examining available information on file
with the application, field checking the property
and surrounding area; the Examiner conducted a
public hearing on the subject as follows:
MINUTES
The following minutes are a summary of the August 29, 2006 hearing.
The legal record is recorded on CD.
The hearing opened on Tuesday, August 29, 2006, at approximately 9:02 a.m. in the Council
Chambers on the seventh floor of the Renton City Hall. Parties wishing to testify were affirmed
by the Examiner.
The following exhibits were entered into the record:
Exhibit No. 1: Yellow file containing the Exhibit No. 2: Site Data and Neighborhood
original application,proof of posting,proof of Detail Map
publication and other documentation pertinent
to this project.
Exhibit No.3: Preliminary Plat Plan Exhibit No.4: Preliminary Clearing and
Grading Plan
asmostrismor
West Coast Preliminary Plat
File No.: LUA-04-149 PP, ECF
September 11, 2006
Page 2
Exhibit No. 5: Tree Inventory Plan Exhibit No. 6: Preliminary Drainage Control
Plan
Exhibit No.7: Preliminary Utility Plan Exhibit No. 8: Wetland Mitigation Plan
Exhibit No.9: Boundary and Topographic Exhibit No. 10: Boundary and Topographic
Survey(north property) Survey(south property)
Exhibit No. 11: Zoning Map Exhibit No. 12: Landscape Plan
Exhibit No. 13: Aerial Photograph of the Exhibit No. 14: Zoning with 3 Plats
Vicinity
Exhibit No. 15: Proposed Condition 6 and
Revised Condition 6
The hearing opened with a presentation of the staff report by Elizabeth Higgins,AICP,Planner,
Development Services, City of Renton, 1055 S Grady Way, Renton, Washington 98055. The
request is for a subdivision of approximately 10.82 acres located in northeast Renton off NE 4th
Street. The proposal is for a 60-lot subdivision of which 46 lots would be developed at a density
of 9.98 du/ac in an R-10 zone and the R-8 zone located to the south would have a density of 5.58
du/ac. The property is currently vacant.
The property fronts on NE 4th Street and is adjacent to several developed subdivisions, the area to
the west and east is proposed for additional subdivision. There are several new subdivisions
south of NE 2'Street that are currently being reviewed.
There are two wetland areas; one on the west part of the property and one on the east side. These
areas are proposed to be preserved in Native Growth Protection areas with buffers. Some buffer
averaging will be required to create building lots, the applicant has agreed to a wetland mitigation
plan in order to compensate for the averaging.
A Geotechnical Report was submitted that indicates the property does not have any critical areas.
The property slopes slightly from the northeast to southwest and the grading on site will be
minimal.
The property is heavily treed, mitigation will be required for the removal of protected trees.
The Environmental Review Committee issued a Determination of Non-Significance—Mitigated
(DNS-M),which included 6 mitigation measures. No appeals were filed.
Several Comprehensive Plan elements are applicable to this project including Community Design
Element, Environmental Element,Housing Element and Land Use Element. The development
standards of both R-10 and R-8 code requirements will be met.
Lots 12, 24 and 28 are split by a zone line division. Wetlands were deducted from each of the
zones and density was determined by the net area less the area of the wetlands for each zone.
West Coast Preliminary Plat
File No.: LUA-04-149 PP, ECF
September 11, 2006
Page 3
The plan meets the development standards in terms of setbacks and building pads, however the
landscape plan will need to be revised as it does not meet code requirements in terms of the
number of trees required for each lot, there is no landscaping shown for NE 4th Street and the
common area labeled "open space".
There is a cul-de-sac in the southeast corner of the property, it has been requested that this be
completed as an eventual through street to Hoquiam and then do half street improvement south to
NE 2°d Street. The abutting plat that should be coming in soon would be able to participate in this
improvement.
A 20-foot wide private access easement would serve new Lots 28 and 29.
A homeowner's association or maintenance agreement for all common improvements, including
utility and access easements, wetland and buffer tracts was imposed.
Traffic,Fire and Parks Mitigation Fees have been imposed on the project.
The site is located within the Renton School District and it has been noted that they would be able
to handle the approximately 26 new students.
The proposed development is within the water service area of Water District 90. There was a
question as to whether a Certificate of Water Availability had been made available. Water main
improvements, including fire hydrants and domestic water services will be required within the
existing and proposed streets.
Individual side sewers will be required to be installed to serve the new lots.
There are two larger storm drainage tracts,one in the R-10 zone and one in the R-8 zone. They
are both on the west side of the plat. There is a small tract adjacent to the alley between Road B
and Hoquiam. They have been sized to accommodate all potential runoff, some of the roof drains
may be redirected into the wetlands.
Sara Slatten, CamWest West Coast LLC, 9720 NE 120th Place, Ste. 100, Kirkland, WA 98034
clarified that they were in agreement with conditions as set forth. She presented Exhibit 15,
Proposed Condition 6 and Revised Condition 6. This new condition, in lieu of providing the
frontage improvements along Hoquiam from south of Lot 32 to Lot 19 of the plat, they are
trading off and providing the half-street improvements down to NE rd Street. The area in front
of Wetland B is not required to have frontage improvements.
Lot 12, 24 and 28, the three lots referenced on the split zone, those lots were increased in size to
adhere to the R-8 standards.
The landscape plan will be revised,at this point it was intended to be somewhat conceptual in
nature, the plan will be revised as soon as the final engineering plans are reviewed and received.
err
ter►
West Coast Preliminary Plat
File No.: LUA-04-149 PP, ECF
September 11,2006
Page 4
The size of the community and the relative small lots associated with this project, an alley would
create an enhanced streetscape with more homes without garages facing the street and be able to
provide a variety of homes in this community.
Ms. Higgins stated that there still will be buffering averaging, a couple of lots will be removed
from the area that needs to be averaged. Part of this is due to the lots not being on a straight road
and could not be a regular shape. In order to get a building pad it is necessary to edge into the
50-foot buffer in some places.
Kayren Kittrick, Development Services Division stated that the alleys are required in the
subdivision code. Development Services has been struggling with how to implement them. A
safe turning radius off of 4`''would be required. It appears that the end of the alley will be
blocked off and access will be denied to NE 4th Street.
Hoquiam south to NE 2nd, it is not necessary to have frontage improvements in front of the
wetland. NE 2nd has become a much stronger road than ever anticipated,with so much
construction going on in that area it will be rebuilt.
Ms. Slatten confirmed that Water District 90 has issued a water availability certificate.
The Examiner called for further testimony regarding this project. There was no one else wishing
to speak,and no further comments from staff. The hearing closed at approximately 9:56 am.
FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS& RECOMMENDATION ,41480
Having reviewed the record in this matter,the Examiner now makes and enters the following:
FINDINGS:
1. The applicant, CamWest West Coast LLC, filed a request for a Preliminary Plat.
2. The yellow file containing the staff report,the State Environmental Policy Act(SEPA)
documentation and other pertinent materials was entered into the record as Exhibit#1.
3. The Environmental Review Committee(ERC), the City's responsible official issued a
Determination of Non-Significance -Mitigated(DNS-M).
4. The subject proposal was reviewed by all departments with an interest in the matter.
5. The subject site is located at 4925 NE 4th Street. The subject site is located south of NE
4th between Hoquiam Avenue on the east and Field Avenue on the west. The subject site
includes five underlying tax lots. A single family home has been removed leaving the
site vacant.
6. The map element of the Comprehensive Plan designates the area in which the subject site
is located as suitable for the development of medium density residential uses and single-
family uses,but does not mandate such development without consideration of other
West Coast Preliminary Plat
File No.: LUA-04-149 PP, ECF
September 11, 2006
Page 5
'w
policies of the Plan. The subject site falls into two comprehensive plan designations with
the north, the portion of the subject site closer to the NE 4th Street arterial, designated for
medium density residential uses while the south portion is designated for single family
detached uses.
7. The subject site is currently zoned R-10(multiple or single family- 10 dwelling
units/acre)and R-8 (Single Family- 8 dwelling units/acre). The northern 6.67 acres are
zoned R-10 while the southern 4.15 acres are zoned R-8.
8. The subject site was annexed to the City with the adoption of Ordinance 4760 enacted in
April 1998.
9. The subject site is approximately 10.82 acres or 471,319.2 square feet.
10. The subject site slopes downward toward its southwest corner where wetland is located.
11. The subject site contains two Category 2 wetlands. Wetland A, 56,950 square feet, is
generally located along the western boundary of the subject site and extends off the site
to the west. Wetland B, 6,823 square feet, is located along the east-central portion of the
subject site and it extends off the site to the east. The applicant proposes buffering
averaging to create more regular building lots.
Nrr.. 12. The submitted tree inventory indicates that there are approximately 281 protected trees,
that is trees larger than 8 inches in caliper at 4.5 feet above grade. These protected trees
contain a wide variety of species including cherry, maple, cedar, fir and hemlock. The
applicant proposes removing all vegetation including significant trees from all areas of
the site except for those in the protected wetlands and wetland buffer areas. Code
requires that significant trees be replaced at no less than 25%of those removed or 70
trees meeting certain standards.
13. The applicant proposes dividing the subject site into 60 separate lots and five tracts.
There would be 46 lots developed under the R-10 zoning found on the north portion of
the site and 14 lots developed on the R-8,or south portion of the site. Five tracts(the
numbers have varied with plat redesign)would be provided for access,open space and
stormwater detention. The western wetland takes up a substantial portion of the
southwest quadrant of the site. The eastern wetland intrudes linearly into the central
portion of the eastern half of the subject site. Due to the location of these wetlands along
the east and west margins of the site, the plat will be traversed by curving streets and will
be divided into somewhat irregular blocks.
14. Proposed Lots 12,24 and 28 straddle the line that divides the zoning between R-10 and
R-8. These lots will meet the requirements of the R-8 Zone. The remaining lots be they
in the R-10 or R-8 Zones will meet the standards of their respective zones for lot
dimensions and setbacks.
15. The plat will develop two main roads. Both roads will enter the site at NE 4th Street at
Nome the north end of the site and run south and then east connecting to Hoquiam or Jericho.
West Coast Preliminary Plat
File No.: LUA-04-149 PP, ECF
September 11, 2006
Page 6
The applicant originally proposed that the southernmost roadway end in a cul-de-sac but
staff recommended that it end at a regular intersection with Hoquiam. A portion of
Hoquiam will be developed along the eastern edge of the site but will not be continuous
due to the location of Wetland B. Since Code requires plats of 20 lots or more to develop
standard streets,the applicant will be required to develop Hoquiam along the eastern edge
from south of the wetland to NE 2nd Street. The applicant will also be developing two
alleys. One will run north to south from 4th from near the center of the north property
line providing access to the rear of Proposed Lots 41 to 60. This would create a third
intersection with NE 4th Street and each one lot apart from the next. This may create
turning conflicts along this major arterial street. Staff recommended that the north-south
alley be restricted to right-in and right-out turns. The second alley would be an east to
west alley just south of the eastern half of the north property line providing access to
Proposed Lots 33 and 40.
16. If the cul-de-sac at the southeast corner of the plat is eliminated in favor of a regular
intersection,Proposed Lots 16 and 19 would become corner lots and have to meet the
larger standards for such lots.
17. Generally, wetland areas and steep slopes are protected by Native Growth Protection
easements to make sure that preservation occurs and intrusions are kept to a minimum
and staff noted this in their report at Page 17.
18. The density for the plat was calculated separately for each zoning category after
subtracting acreage found in the wetlands(63,756 square feet)and dedicated to both
public roads(90,831 square feet)and private roads(5,224 square feet). The R-10 density
would be 9.98 units per acre. The R-8 density would be 5.58 dwelling units per acre.
The overall density was calculated at 8.4 dwelling units per acre.
19. The subject site is located within the Renton School District. The project is expected to
generate approximately 26 school age children. These students would be spread across
the grades and would be assigned on a space available basis.
20. The development will increase traffic approximately 10 trips per unit or approximately
600 trips for the 60 single-family homes. Approximately ten percent of the trips, or
approximately 60 additional peak hour trips will be generated in the morning and
evening.
21. Stormwater will be contained in three detention facilities with some clean stormwater
used to recharge the existing wetlands. The stormwater detention tracts will require
landscaping per code. There have been storm drainage problems in this area when it was
under King County jurisdiction. The ERC imposed conditions on handling stormwater.
22. Sewer service will be provided by the City. Domestic water will be provided by Water
District#90.
CONCLUSIONS:
West Coast Preliminary Plat
File No.: LUA-04-149 PP, ECF
September 11,2006
Page 7
fire
1. The proposed plat appears to serve the public use and interest. While the applicant will
be developing portions of what should be wetland buffers, in the main both the wetlands
and buffers will be preserved and protected and as a tradeoff to allow reasonable lots to
be developed, the applicant will be enlarging and improving other buffer areas.
2. The plat is designed to work with and around the wetlands on the site and with the site's
split zoning. The applicant has created a modified street grid system that has two
intersecting curving streets providing access to the plat and its sixty lots. The plat has
also accommodated the split zoning and both R-10 and R-8 standards have been met in
the design of the plat. The division of this site will create additional housing
opportunities for those seeking both larger and smaller detached single-family lots.
While many of the significant trees will be lost to the development of 60 lots, the
applicant will be replanting approximately 70 trees to offset that loss. In addition, street
trees and required landscaping will further restore the trees and vegetation lost to
development. The applicant will have to comply with code landscaping requirements.
3. The development of new lots and housing will increase the tax base of the City. The
mitigation fees imposed by the ERC will further offset impacts that this development will
have on area roads,parks and general emergency services.
4. Staff will monitor the three intersections that this plat will be creating along NE 4th
Street. The City will reserve the right to close off the alley's intersection with NE 4th if
problems are encountered in that area. In order to minimize potential problems, the alley
will be limited to right turning movements both into and out of the alley. The applicant
will have to provide appropriate turning radii on both sides of the alley.
5. The applicant shall comply with staffs recommendation to eliminate the cul-de-sac and
create a full intersection with Hoquiam in order to allow both pedestrian and vehicle
connections to roads and public facilities south and east of this plat and comply with the
City's goals of creating a grid system.
6. The applicant shall create a Native Growth Protection easement for the wetlands and their
buffers.
7. In conclusion, the applicant has created a reasonable plat for this constrained 10 acre
parcel and the City Council should approve the plat.
RECOMMENDATION:
The City Council should approve the 60-lot Preliminary Plat subject to the following
conditions:
1. The applicant shall submit a Wetland Mitigation Plan to demonstrate how the
approved buffer averaging would be mitigated in areas abutting the wetland
buffers. The satisfaction of this requirement is subject to the review and approval
of the Development Services Project Manager prior to recording the final plat.
West Coast Preliminary Plat
File No.: LUA-04-149 PP, ECF
September 11, 2006
Page 8
2. A revised conceptual landscape plan shall be submitted to the Development
Services Project Manager for review and approval prior to final plat recording.
Prior to the issuance of building permits,detailed landscape plans must be
submitted and approved.
3. A homeowners association shall be created concurrently with the recording of the
final plat in order to establish maintenance responsibilities for all shared
improvements. A draft of the document shall be submitted to the City of Renton
Development Services Division for review and approval by the City Attorney
and Property Services section prior to recording of the final plat.
4. The proposed alley intersecting NE 4th Street shall be signed for right turn in and
right turn out only and a median sign shall be installed in NE 4th Street
prohibiting a left turn into the alley from the westbound lanes of NE 4th Street.
The City shall retain the authority to close the alley to all turns at NE 4`h Street.
5. The outside perimeter of the wetland buffer shall be fenced with a split-rail fence.
Rear yards of residential property abutting the wetland buffer shall not be fenced
with sight-obscuring fencing,but rather shall utilize the split-rail fence.
6. The cul-de-sac shown as the terminal point of Road B at the southeast corner of
the Plat shall be replaced by a street that intersects Road B with Hoquiam
Avenue NE and Hoquiam Avenue NE shall be completed with street
improvements to the south as far as its intersection with NE 2°d Street except no
improvement shall be required across Wetland B.
7. A Certificate of Water Availability from Water District 90 shall be submitted to
Development Services Project Manager at the time of civil/utility construction
review.
8. A Native Growth Protection Easement shall be recorded to preserve the wetlands
and their buffers and buffer averaged areas and shall be subject to review and
approval by the City.
9. Proposed Lots 16 and 19 shall comply with the lot size and setback requirements
demanded of Corner Lots.
ORDERED THIS 11`h day of September 2006
•
sf \ts. N
FRED J.KAUF AN t
HEARING EXAMINER
West Coast Preliminary Plat
File No.: LUA-04-149 PP, ECF
September 11,2006
Page 9
Nosy
TRANSMITTED THIS 11th day of September 2006 to the parties of record:
Elizabeth Higgins Kayren Kittrick Sara Slatten
1055 S Grady Way Development Services CamWest West Coast LLC
Renton, WA 98055 City of Renton 9720 NE 120t Place, Ste. 100
Kirkland, WA 98034
Tim Burkhardt Jason Lee Jennifer McCall
4827 197th Avenue E 5100 NE 3rd Street Land Acquisitions Assistant
Bonney Lake, WA 98390 Renton, WA 98059 Lozier Homes Corporation
1203 114th Avenue SE
Bellevue, WA 98004
TRANSMITTED THIS 11th day of September 2006 to the following:
Mayor Kathy Keolker Stan Engler, Fire
Jay Covington, Chief Administrative Officer Larry Meckling, Building Official
Julia Medzegian, Council Liaison Planning Commission
Gregg Zimmerman, PBPW Administrator Transportation Division
Alex Pietsch, Economic Development Utilities Division
Jennifer Henning, Development Services Neil Watts,Development Services
Stacy Tucker, Development Services Janet Conklin, Development Services
King County Journal
Pursuant to Title IV, Chapter 8, Section 100(G)of the City's Code, request for reconsideration
must be filed in writing on or before 5:00 p.m.,September 25,2006. Any aggrieved person
feeling that the decision of the Examiner is ambiguous or based on erroneous procedure, errors of
law or fact, error in judgment, or the discovery of new evidence which could not be reasonably
available at the prior hearing may make a written request for a review by the Examiner within
fourteen(14)days from the date of the Examiner's decision. This request shall set forth the
specific ambiguities or errors discovered by such appellant, and the Examiner may, after review
of the record, take further action, as he deems proper.
An appeal to the City Council is governed by Title N,Chapter 8, Section 110, which requires
that such appeal be filed with the City Clerk, accompanying a filing fee of$75.00 and meeting
other specified requirements. Copies of this ordinance are available for inspection or purchase in
the Finance Department, first floor of City Hall. An appeal must be filed in writing on or
before 5:00 p.m.,September 25, 2006.
If the Examiner's Recommendation or Decision contains the requirement for Restrictive
Covenants, the executed Covenants will be required prior to approval by City Council or
final processing of the file. You may contact this office for information on formatting
covenants.
The Appearance of Fairness Doctrine provides that no ex parte(private one-on-one)
%rr communications may occur concerning pending land use decisions. This means that parties to a
West Coast Preliminary Plat
File No.: LUA-04-149 PP, ECF
September 11,2006
Page 10
land use decision may not communicate in private with any decision-maker concerning the
proposal. Decision-makers in the land use process include both the Hearing Examiner and
members of the City Council.
All communications concerning the proposal must be made in public. This public
communication permits all interested parties to know the contents of the communication and
would allow them to openly rebut the evidence. Any violation of this doctrine would result in the
invalidation of the request by the Court.
The Doctrine applies not only to the initial public hearing but to all requests for Reconsideration
as well as Appeals to the City Council.
Project Location: 4925 NE 4th Street(NE 4"' St between Field and Hoquiam)
r ".-`-�,
- fir= tai ' �';
_._ 1�' _ sITE •`
L
Tom' _
*
Note: "applicant"is the project proponent and applicant for the current land use action. References to future responsibilities
of the"applicant"should be interpreted to mean future landowner,developer,or project proponent. Development approvals
and conditions of approval are associated with the project/property and not individuals.
E6 - 10 T23N R5E E 1/2
CA NEh St. -10
R-8 �, R-4 R-4 R-4
CA -1
R-8 v- R-4 R-4
C A 1 0R-8 z R_,� / ~ 1N1E 3rd Si -- .R
R-8 5 ti
R-8
R=4-.
0
R-4� ' -`. ° C ,. _
R_8 NE 21d8St. -4
~ NR
� NE 2nd St. R-4 ‘21d C
I w,
R-8z R-4
14 r-
R-8 d R 'a)
0 1 SE °2nd Ct. R7
_i --- R�84_- - SE 2 d P1 = i = << , '
x
z
�_-� R-4 : i�
N
\\Ve f 1 ..
*111111e 4
w t 2 › ,I
r Y\
l r SE
�
t
SE
139th Pl. I SE
I-
,
w w
r
SE 141St Sty
w
OD
- cw
SE 142nd St. w �'
„ L_______:_;
cia 13)
61
7.1 CC) 0'3
'0 '"0 I -4' F:t1, -.44
ri---- \ (--, 1 rtil n 1
SE 145th P1.
Y G6 - 22 T23N R5E E 1/2
ZONING ----Renton ,Mottoq „•
`Y° EXHIBIT
P/BVPW' I,SSBVI(�S
15 T23N R5E 11
.•�� 02/16/06
..) ..--1 4:1E-1
•
) ~ M
w
g ;,¢ NW1/4, NE1/4, SEC. 15, T. 23 N., R. 6 E., W.M.
Z. I� • PROJECT 8TATISTIC8 Cry $
Ist I 202220: R-5 2-10 ® 1OT DES ONagN „ ... - .I
011035 PROPERTY MCA 150,161 5I 250,566 Sr 1` - . -- Wa - - di
OR(OO.ARDS(w212.2 05) 35,706 Sr 2•,0q sI
1102.22220 52450 �..»»:; " - Sa
..OUC 5/W 50225. 235691 SI 65,605 Sr :•. __ _$� / / 2 RRR
ALLEYS: 0 Sr 5,666 Sr _".• �t.f"N-ii• - - .
Z WNEWAY/ACOCSS MUS: 0 Y 1,300 S! - • IIr E[j^�Er�]r
` 105,310 3! 200,9 SI DISTAMD2 TO IARTME57 - - ° T \/ `7� �,
< NR PRWCCT ARU Srj: I.St AC 6.61 M
ACCESS VONIf -—C. r I■ V Y
NET
rRDACT ARU , - -�- 61 - - '
O.DSW 10,3: 6.65 0 00 ..ic d 1-.TT--a._-- --�i�%- -T..�_-•
F
PROPOSED DENSITY(U,N13/AO): I 10 .- I �- 1 -,-.--
- .�\ I
~ S Wm Ok.v.�R� 13' 10' ty r I Ij.l a,1•`� �� I !
N4000.
n H xY
OREAR. 20'
C C6 50.222,20k,
ir
(2 } TCR10R SIDE: 0' 3' ,Qa I„'� .,%
I- CORNER SIOC. 13• 0• Y F .e Y �y• , j
A \ ,yELFKp Cl( 3 a,,; I .. lir'• i T
NI •
W •1 �: ad va;ail¢S�r,N
ow ,
W \ •aiSM5L0 1pf ” '0' Mo 11 1
T „
a.
��,
d _t �'; V 1; 1
Ea•",� d . �I II I :�,' r f ‘..ft., I .I�Y •,,W Y ) I
333 3' •I j (. ° r. • r. .,
}"zi ' •.': rVTVRE R/W i A •Jp
•�11 II7 I R. �1 ,1sly I R Q Y RDAD'8
/ 1,4'.,.
,4' , _--,-moi., ,= w _ , u.a,s ! a1 Y" �a .p
YI
;,,l);., f 11,.,, <.;.,. nM, li ' _.,Yr ..a'Rx �; 6� I
1''•�I:, jib•
-�� ^_-�� '//r
i • •J,YY
11 CQ..!1, 1.,
! '� �v° a.d(v .aX��`iRTf HI°,axiE Y'0 >ai6n° ,.o6YY� aY ,,dE. • 1 5 ( -�6N" _r+r' uh"v '--1
it 1
•
•
f LOCA Y D I 1;11
, - SSW • Y
At
Wry'
II
9 I III R1La 'f a >S(Y � • /." ., dr. ,.----- I
11
® 6� ,7.066 .o, x t.� Inl
1 >.J(.' ,.OYx� a.o76 � a.e�Y .I r A _.��, / •_, ,;..t I >�II
1 MIN TON \ '� �y
�r� I1� 1 : '�'I!I ..• ,.•
'+w,,.:I ,ldxx nQ D , -, i__ —
! L 1 a.
<
CO
,,•1 1 S ——— — — _, I MATVIf1apS�OW101 ,-
rtI - 1• ! , .1 r x1.3111„ i-' .. - •I '1o6et►ty: 1 ,� I ! ¢ J
rl'" ) 1 II 1a t .qN ) ti .',....vg • • -,,..........__• __'"// `I. ^ ...1 0 d
:;'d ) '1,,,,..,,,-," ,. ... •i4i , a.,P, ..„9,,. ° aw2x aaPr ', / �,I +/ - , , - .o I•• . ' I ))# 'r1 r'i: ,V�' - }
I 11 I r'; • • • • • -�.' 1 I acc
-11
D :1,:,::.!,,,j,14' I. = .• I,��
•S
Yv yLH- / I REQUIREMENTS AND FOR R-8=o11CT SLALOM ADJACENTI) El4QYYiNBae re aM.r/aoy
l.
I„� NO StTYCI(S
1'_ 1 Y h e, 1 ` c wU TRAC S:NYC OE 10' Z
CJ.Y I/
FOX WS AND AMO TION aY1�--Delw. SL-1
,/'� � IMPACTS AND 11RIOATgN
Y. I SEE SMELT 10 0 /0 aNttT A
R,\Rr5„51,\100iCom..•I)\002-06(w.,l...,,,.,,,,...,,\.c..5101 0r -Sc01• 20 N 6D 8C �'�DOIx Y
5 .1,�, 1'x10 —
SC015 tat -'• DOL.: Or 10
o--4
r:r•:)
.,.—I .'
00
NWI/4, NE1/4, SEC. 16, T. 23 N„ R. 6 E., W.M.
5 . It PROJECT STATISTICS
8
163811.2 vl 1.
Liii
i.
! zo......o. R-6 6-10
...„,,.,
'--• . -."
(g LOT DEVONATION L - 1
MSS PROPERTY AREA 160,711 St 290,66$SF F•,., i -.____ _,........_-_-_-_,-4---,,, .--, , , ,,, ,
winc.u.MLA;OA 2r LANDO 39,70.V 14,041 SF 1.,24.. ".:'!".'.'..'!2!......... .-''. 1 7,-_-___ , ,/ /
i\ 1 ii N di 1
z rggERga`l3,6.: O7F"v Velrl OVILDPIC SEIBACM
---;:•--"..-IiitestrF07-"--0 2 '....----4 ---.;11.1 7/ ....•••'' /
PROJECT APLA(VP 106.310 V 200,613 SF 'N. /T----- N --,-;,,0 k ,,,,i
,,_. •
.J KT PROJECT AREA(AO 2.51 AC 4.41 AC • .•• DISTANCE TO FARTHEST N N / M • .4-
11. PROPOS°,LOTS: 14 46 ACCESS POINT , '.'1 ,7 .•. • I' , • /
...„, \
,
i., 2) f „ •6i!
5.65 CH
/1
PROPOSED DENSITY(046TS/AC) .
Z ALLDWE0 wart(tooni/A) to
r--,,,,*
,.. --- _..
.. • \ . ./ %k 1 g iiii
-... ) 1 ' i IT ,-^., I
t,-; 1-_- u"NitirtliwAl ,s.
\ I /
/ 1• 1 4. /1 pi
c.o...o,. 20. SO' N 4 / --..- .. /-*• • :el' ..t. .
20' IS'
' \\'‘ / A's //.. . / .41 41..... .‘,4 ,D\V::, .. / . ,Pm / :4SW
0 („U INITRIOR SiDE. 5' 0'
1 ga
0 1-Z CORNER 140E, 10' 10'
' 'N g&gg , / .,t. 6,4Qv VII V I ,ftl.1 . -......„0,Is. ., ...,....'.."' ,,,,
1'4 4.4 JEDILD0UDELEL4gLaan,
.._ ...
, . /,. ,, I
k5..4\ •• 33\/V..2 lig,., T, I 61 '
ti) X
ALIIMI JECLailaa ..t- ; ,.. -,..0-6 •,4 1 --; , „f). ,
a - 1 V f
DOTER 0.PAcT 740
---. g2, 7 s. / R WPJ, •411 ' ' ''
)n'', ''''' 1 I 1FT 4-..•.., \ ,
- .•4 . . . i
Z ERE SUFFER aZTION 7,526 SF 354 SA ' \ .2 ,
.. .
>, ..
-
...:,•••
- .,
I ' , /
_ teti-- -• .. .11 _ '4. ATIA',130WTH /
AREA ...§1. .: ''.ip ' .-.•-
dirt. 't.
3
I A • ... N -
.. I
, 1 ,
' POS
1 ,
TRAPTI , . . . .
" ...9.- .-. •,11- - ...O. , .
,
/ - ),
1 -
.. ....__ ,
3;Zr ''' " , .
1: ,lv, ..
:.; •
,, ^0 , '
• . bl: ' . -t,. , ,tzir
.h 0 ' 1 A ' ‘..6-,
ii6 . ••
1: ''•• ',,".1 .'1., 1 ,l,•
.
,
, •_.. - ' ::::,::.*:j,,' '2.
....L.2 .
J 2/ •.•'''' i •:i*::::;.,
....:.............. ........:::
U24 1 ,'2-' ..2 .'•' . . ..
' .
1.-.11. 4,- , •' .41 ' ••••••••••-
,, \ ,• I.,,r.1.14,,t.- .........- .--- ..;.—.. --....--...-...,...-. ---- ,-..1.....4— -
i.:,;';':'•$,Kimi-s<"""""'" , \ 1
.
''r 4" :111 --.----=7.:*" -...-".."`A.:•".:417---.7.--.:---7t.-
• •"•••• •
. 1 te/ . -\ `-_ ',. . , • —,•' . .. .• . ::::::::.:::: •
9, 1
tlrii I ' , .I, 1 .1,..,•.,•. • • • -7-------"'----0,-- -.----;
- ...,
••••••••
• - "" '.'" -
--,
...............— ..
4 i i
______
i ----7-- - • - ,
or • . ...
. .
,• . • . ./. ..........„.;..v.........
............
.............
i•., , , ,1„1„. (,-,
• , „..................•••
. . ..........
, --. .f,,' '--- - • ' '''"°. . , 11 1
• .142v
f T- 0
4,2tr ) ,
-
4k•ssg. I ; ,I 1 1
. . , - ovitstmoot \,.,.., \,.. ,,,d4 v
II I; q
011 - .'', .. '1.•C III. . •
--- - - i - VW g ,*'
v •v , ,
, *, — \\\.• ss.
, 11 1
• _______. i
' I- ,• ' \ ;"- ,•• ...,---F• • • .•• 11 11 1 211 1 1
..1 . .
1 . }, , •
•-
L__,....:•:__ :'-,;j,,•',,.''," 1=I=MIIIIMMII"liiiillill .0, .% ..,', ..,',..i:,;" ,, . , L 1, .'"..2,,,.. 4 ...,, ,314 sr 1.._________j,....,-:.,."fl.,, , •.!,..!!:",', di ;; ,.....
IIIE au I
• .9 ./ ""- ,.. . • , ,- • . „ .. . ''.'..... i.,,,, 'i ,, ,‘
' K . - • ' ''..4,. .2'k il...,1 i r,
'1 ..:;''i.. •.1,'' - •
. . ...Q. '' "
' ' •- . / -
/ 4 •
•• •••••••••••••••••••••••• ;.; .• ' •••': . • • • / • '•• •1 1• •J;./. ,• P .;
e .*' ..:::•iii.:::: :.,::::i:.ii.fsii:::iiii•::::::.:••:. ' ' —." •1 '—:'• " ' ''. ' ,'.1 ' •, 1 -tr, -1 1. 4. , '
I i4 II IY I '.-,r I *,;:l •
•. '1%* ,• - . X .‘•
.Itsinoti
',,t,.,,,,,----' - 711, N.'. / ',' • • •• " • .,',p• 1i
' ' . • •.'' ' . • .4. ' n,,,,i.Ni....... ..,,':,,',
- I • \.,..46'
Z
III 1 /j
r I '• 4::.' i kid.,, . .. • ..
,,,, ...4. '.1.... ROAD A A ' . .i
-
. ..1,4.
N1 .
1 ' 5
g ,.1'-,
-, --...„ --•-•- ---•_____ ,.„,
_._______
li.
• . ...--,-.: -)444TRio--cittzwry ittnectoK•AResRA.- •-• • !. . .-:-1,: i f ,,•• , 1•
r i A ,: "2,
1— ct•
0 z
LPollii < 0
II , ., ,, ,.:,..,.,,;;! ,• -. ,• 1151 Oil
' ' • • ' • • • • • . • • • .•'•si •••V••..•'• • I •.. • •' 4/. •:' I •'
,.,, , ,. ,-•, .1
I''5i ;
•we7ely-f i,. . . n,.. . .1,• 7, . ;: • '..,' / i '',• It't :vitt i I , . ar . 0 NE
I ,. .. „ • .
i.''''k ''..r.:';:.; 1. I..,'. m ' . 4.0.•' ''', ' • .
il:',,,,,,,,,, ,q.,,,,L, .1,i.,,,,,.., .. ,m,s.;', ,2v., ' .2, , ,2,, •• .2..; ., ,\ :3i F,/,•.,.,,•...•.. ,• • • • • •'.' •'?AA IF.".".'.''.''.,'.?,,Arr'---" .-"'-',,, ..,` 't:1, 'i',,. il ii, ''').,
,.'..• .1,1,,,i'n,'. ,
17.
I.... 5
4 '1.,.V.-i!. •is.:.' '''111; '1 ' .•
.1‘.4.I4..z.‘ ......,.;,. ,, ...
- ,k'--)1• li• .'''' co .
. . .. ..
11.1 z
1 ' 1 , 41 , ••.,•
1 •',.''':!:•:;*1! \\, . .. , • , •
,
., 1J 4o _ , _
..
.1 .' –,--- •-11,,,
• I• -•
-_ / I
'...•.t.::•,'.i ... s . .. .. .. •. . '''‘'44••,<.•-••• , , . , . ... .. .
_ ..
-7 W
F.' ' ....il..',•'1 I'i,:i.,! 1 • ' ''' ';••••..... -"•-=',,,,,• .. .:,_1..., • .
kk
_____ _______,
';•,1
1 ,,k,),:: , ."V":1,•."1 1 ,, . i
Blitgadystumuguezatum.
It 24 ANO L.0
::•';,"•'.:!
ACOVIRCRENT1 A0616-11 2ONCT
RA ... ...................f
Oota:
f ZED ..________ ----
WM-1
i i •'.. . ..,J
t., . it • !, '
&e:-_____________0,..,
'''''"'"'"‘" ..1)\°02•0' ' ..0\d•9\.,..tovc_...0,d"-5,,I. .0 1
40 0 40 80 br WV
..---------------- E 1.
,...40' 17g2geszwazil
,
foot '''.....__________. Cr 10
3. COMPLIANCE WITH ERC MITIGATION MEASURES
Based on an analysis of the probable impacts from the proposal, the Environmental Review
Committee(ERC) issued the following mitigation measures with the Determination of Non-
Significance—Mitigated (DNS-M):
1. The applicant shall comply with the recommendations included in the geotechnical
report, "Subsurface Exploration, Geotechnical Hazard, and Preliminary Geotechnical
Engineering Report West Coast Property," by Associated Earth Sciences, Inc. dated
December 3, 2004.
2. The project shall comply with the 2005 King County Surface Water Design Manual for
both detention (Conservation Flow Control — Level 2) and water quality facilities.
3. The applicant shall provide half street improvements (Hoquiam Avenue NE) between
the south terminus of the new Road 'B', as shown on the Preliminary Plat, and NE 2nd
Street, an existing road.
4. The applicant shall pay the appropriate Traffic Mitigation Fee based on $75.00 per each
new average daily trip associated with the project prior to the recording of the final plat.
5. The applicant shall pay the appropriate Fire Mitigation Fee based on a rate of$488.00
per new single-family lot prior to the recording of the final plat.
,41101
6. The applicant shall pay the appropriate Parks Mitigation Fee based on $530.76 per new
single-family lot prior to the recording of the final plat.
•
Order No. 580122
PLAT CERTIFICATE
SCHEDULE A
Page 2
The land referred to in this certificate is situated in the State of
Washington, and described as follows:
PARCEL A:
The north half of the southwest quarter of the northwest quarter of
the northeast quarter of Section 15, Township 23 North, Range 5
East, W.M. , in King County, Washington;
EXCEPT the east 30 feet and the west 30 feet thereof;
EXCEPT the south 100 feet of the west 190 feet of the north half of
the southwest quarter of the northwest quarter of the northeast
quarter of Section 15, Township 23 North, Range 5 East, W.M. , in
King County, Washington;
AND EXCEPT the east 30 feet of the west 220 feet of the south 30
feet of the north half of the southwest quarter of the northwest
quarter of the northeast quarter of Section 15, Township 23 North,
Range 5 East, W.M. , in King County, Washington;
TOGETHER WITH an easement for ingress, egress and utilities over,
upon and across the south 30 feet and the west 30 feet of the south
100 feet of the west 190 feet of the north half of the southwest
quarter of the northwest quarter of the northeast quarter of
Section 15, Township 23 North, Range 5 East, W.M. , in King County,
Washington;
TOGETHER WITH an easement for ingress, egress and utilities over,
upon and across the east 30 feet of the west 220 feet of the south
30 feet of said subdivision.
PARCEL B:
South half of the northwest quarter of the northwest quarter of the
northeast quarter of Section 15, Township 23 North, Range 5 East,
W.M. , in King County, Washington;
EXCEPT the west 30 feet and the east 30 feet thereof.
PARCEL C:
The northwest quarter of the northwest quarter of the northwest
quarter of the northeast quarter of Section 15, Township 23 North,
Range 5 East, W.M. , in King County, Washington;
EXCEPT the east 150 feet;
EXCEPT the west 30 feet; and
EXCEPT the north 42 feet thereof conveyed to King County for S.E
128th Street by Deed recorded May 20, 1964, under Recording Number
5738288.
fin' (continued)
Order No. 580122
PLAT CERTIFICATE
SCHEDULE A
Page 3
LEGAL DESCRIPTION, continued:
PARCEL D:
The west 19 feet of the east 150 feet of the northwest quarter of
the northwest quarter of the northwest quarter of the northeast
quarter of Section 15, Township 23 North, Range 5 East, W.M. , in
King County, Washington;
EXCEPT the north 42 feet thereof conveyed to King County for road by
Deed recorded February 3, 1965, under Recording Number 5840155.
PARCEL E:
The west 24 feet of the west half of the northeast quarter of the
northwest quarter of the northwest quarter of the northeast quarter
in Section 15, Township 23 North, Range 5 East, W.M. , in King
County, Washington;
EXCEPT the north 42 feet thereof conveyed to King County for road by
Deed recorded February 3, 1965, under Recording Number 5840155;
AND
The east 131 feet of the northwest quarter of the northwest quarter `041100
of the northwest quarter of the northeast quarter, in Section 15,
Township 23 North, Range 5 East, W.M. , in King County, Washington;
EXCEPT the north 42 feet thereof conveyed to King County for road by
Deed recorded February 3, 1965, under Recording Number 5840155.
END OF SCHEDULE A
A1-717:4-TED BY
C:711 COUNCIL
Date 0?006
COMMITTEE OF THE WHOLE
COMMITTEE REPORT
October 16, 2006
Springbrook Trail Missing Link
The Springbrook Trail, first identified as the "Springbrook Valley Trail"in the City of Renton
Trails Master Plan, was adopted as part of the Comprehensive Parks, Recreation, and Open
Space Plan in 1993. This trail is a north/south route and generally follows the Springbrook
Creek from the city limits at SW 43rd Street north to the Black River Riparian Forest and
connects to a much larger trail system with access to the cities of Pacific and Seattle. .
The Springbrook Trail Missing Link was bid as part of the Springbrook Creek Wetland and
Habitat Mitigation Bank Project located on 130 acres of city-owned property. The Engineer's
estimate for trail construction was $1,599,997 with the low bid coming in at $646,398. The
City has sufficient funds to cover the cost of construction, including a ten percent contingency
for a total of $711,038, from the Community Development Impact Mitigation Fund (Fund
303).
The Committee of the Whole recommends approval to fund construction of the Springbrook
Trail in the amount of$711,038 from the Community Development Impact Mitigation Fund
(Fund 303) and further authorizes trail construction.
I t
'sandy Corman, Council President
cc: Terry Higashiyama
Leslie Betlach
Springbrook Trail whole.doc\ rev O1/05 bh
A Priel QED BY
C:n v COUNCIL
FINANCE COMMITTEE
COMMITTEE REPORT Date /0 -//•AOC&
October 16,2006
Water Billing Adjustment for Harris/Reeves
(Referred September 11, 2006)
The Finance Committee recommends Council approve an extended water bill adjustment
period of 12 months,which equals compensation in the amount of$1,162.25, for a water
service line leak to a single-family dwelling at 2313 SE 8th Drive,Renton. This residence is
located in the Falcon Ridge Development,which has some unusual and extraordinary
circumstances as follows:
• Development standards in 1986 for Falcon Ridge Planned-Unit Development did not
require the developer to install each water meter in front of the subject property.
• Private water service line was installed under and across neighboring properties,
driveways and ditch lines making the leak difficult to find and to repair.
• Owner went through extraordinary effort to find the leak as documented by hiring
professionals to locate the leak, due to the unusual location of the service line on adjacent
property.
• Owner had to relocate the meter and replace the water service line.
ID Aft.
Don Persson, Chair
enis W. Law,Vice Chair
Toni Nelson,Member
cc: Michael Bailey,FIS Administrator
Gregg Zimmerman,PBPW Administrator
Lys Hornsby,Utility Systems Director
Elloyce Sumpter,Utility Accounts Supervisor
APPROVED BY
CT/COUNCIL
Date A9-16-ap06
COMMUNITY SERVICES
COMMITTEE REPORT
October 16, 2006
Municipal Arts Commission: Appointment of Ms. Patricia Riggs
(Referred October 2, 2006)
The Community Services Committee recommends concurrence in the staff recommendation
to approve Mayor Keolker's appointment of Ms. Patricia Riggs to the Municipal Arts
Commission for an unexpired term expiring December 31, 2007.
Toni Nelson, Chair
/07a:66
Marcie Palmer,Vice Chair
Lon
Dan Clawson, Member
C: Peter Renner
Is/read/ 9 /.°4-2"4
A a4/S 04-20 '
CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON
ORDINANCE NO. 502 023
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON
ANNEXING CERTAIN TERRITORY OF THE CITY OF RENTON.
(QUERIN II ANNEXATION; FILE NO. A-05-003)
WHEREAS, under the provisions of RCW 35A.14.120 as amended, a petition in writing
requesting that certain territory contiguous to the City of Renton, as described below, be annexed
to the City of Renton, was presented and filed with the City Clerk on or about September 6,
2005; and
WHEREAS, prior to the filing and circulation of said petition for annexation to the City
of Renton, the petitioning owners notified the City Council of their intention to commence such
proceedings as provided by law, as more particularly specified in RCW 35A.14.120, and upon
public meeting thereon, it having been determined and the petitioning owners having agreed to
assume their fair share of the pre-existing outstanding indebtedness of the City of Renton as it
pertains to the territory petitioned to be annexed; and to accept that portion of the City's
Comprehensive Plan as it pertains to the territory including the applicable Zoning Code relating
thereto; and
WHEREAS, the King County Department of Assessments has examined and verified the
signatures on the petition for annexation and determined signatures represent at least sixty
percent (60%)of the assessed value (excluding streets)of the area to be annexed, as provided by
law; and
1
ORDINANCE NO.
WHEREAS, the Economic Development, Neighborhoods and Strategic Planning
Department of the City of Renton having considered and recommended the annexing of said
property to the City of Renton; and
WHEREAS, the City invoked the jurisdiction of the Boundary Review Board for King
County on January 18, 2006, and requested expansion of the boundaries originally proposed; and
WHEREAS, the King County Boundary Review Board met on May 22, 2006, to
consider the City of Renton's request and issued its findings and decision on this matter on June
9, 2006, deeming the "Notice of Intention" for the original 7.18 acre site approved with
modifications that expanded it to 24.0 acres; and
WHEREAS, the City Council fixed August 7, 2006, as the time and place for public
hearing in the City Council Chambers, City Hall, Renton, Washington, upon the petition and
notice thereof having been given as provided by law; and
WHEREAS, pursuant to said notices, public hearings have been held at the time and
place specified in the notices, and the Council having considered all matters in connection with
the petition and further determined that all legal requirements and procedures of the law
applicable to the petition method for annexation have been met; and
WHEREAS, the City of Renton is concurrently zoning the annexation site R-4, four
units per net acre, and R-8, eight units per net acre;
NOW, 'THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RENTON,
WASHINGTON, DOES ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS:
SECTION L All requirements of the law in regard to the annexation by petition
method, including the provisions of RCW 35A.14.120, 130, 140 and 150, have been met. It is
further determined that the petition for annexation to the City of Renton of the property and
2
ORDINANCE NO.
territory described below is hereby approved and granted; the following described property being .
contiguous to the City limits of the City of Renton is hereby annexed to the City of Renton, and
on and after the effective date of this Ordinance, the property shall constitute a part of the City of
Renton and shall be subject to all its laws and ordinances then and thereafter in force and effect;
the property being described as follows:
See Exhibit "A" attached hereto and made a part hereof as if fully set forth herein
[Said property, approximately 24.0 acres in area, is generally located south of NE
Sunset Blvd. and north of SE 114t Street, if extended, east of 141 `, if extended,
and west of 144th Avenue SE, if extended]
and the owners of the property within the annexation shall assume their fair share of the
outstanding indebtedness of the City of Renton as prescribed in RCW 35A.14.120 as it pertains
to the property, and the property shall be subject to the City's Comprehensive Plan and Zoning
Code.
SECTION II. This Ordinance shall be effective upon its passage, approval, and
30 days after its publication.
A certified copy of this Ordinance shall be filed with the King County Council, State of
Washington, and as otherwise provided by law.
PASSED BY THE CITY COUNCIL this day of , 2006.
Bonnie I. Walton, City Clerk
APPROVED BY THE MAYOR this day of , 2006.
Kathy Keolker, Mayor
3
•
ORDINANCE NO.
Approved as to form:
Lawrence J. Warren, City Attorney
Date of Publication:
ORD.1285:8/29/06:ma
4
•
Exhibit A
QUERIN II ANNEXATION
LEGAL DESCRIPTION
That portion of the Northeast quarter of the Northwest quarter of the Northeast quarter of
Section 10, Township 23 North,Range 5 East, W.M., King County, Washington, lying
northerly of the south line of the north 165 feet of the south half(1/2)thereof;
LESS the west 30 feet thereof.
TOGETHER WITH that portion of the Southwest quarter of the Southeast quarter of
Section 3, Township 23 North, Range 5 East, W.M., King County, Washington, lying
southwesterly, southerly and southwesterly of the existing City Limits of Renton as
annexed by Ordinance No. 4092, and lying easterly, southerly and easterly of the existing
City Limits of Renton as annexed by Ordinance No. 4026.
�_ _ Exhibit A
Si low sr• t.
�ir vs* HUMP, Lib 411 >r ' ZI ��
1014 I Mop . •leftowpitvo�ff •
llllll/, 1Aii N■ no r
t rtt ii i wave inialfk '��:/� ori ;�� :ammoEa,:� 11 a aMIAItIIlIMf7 yin%ills pea agra ''4104 q,'� im
wank ail gin unman I nipa ipip u�!l�J�u in ��.:
:u!1TAo�A/ ga u11!!1 a � * 4�1�� ��� �fir\ is'!� r■:41111 �Irl'i!a 4th St,
:1,181:::::
�C �Ii��� G�� � il
�� � :■:��r������ iip' ,
► �t - 0 �i►*t4i
inisk •fr a 0 slik Aix Ili
llsa il11111 �, 1gl111►la I 'P -v-4010i0,1
■4 " tom
..„,....1 ..... " , 3 1.1"111 .iiiiii OWN&
111111.
maillinnanwa •III
./ �/ Mil //�- :� ►111 ril =- //le
_r w - ■14
�1 a
oney C eek ,:II: A. ■ ht p tf /SSO
pi
111111111410.1,gilii t •
i go'di in in rf.;71C_Ii;t1141Willi
1...it a
1 mg r_ _
NZ Fir . . ,,,..,
L'IL:_; ''','r :, -\ 111-0111-Pril
MI
illrim Ea MA
11111
all 11.1411 , , , ___ __
•
t , .' IN 11. ■�a ■� 11 milAM v:e:
• ila AM
1.■I I1udulr�il■� ` -- ■ am a 1111
r ��111■ o mei _•E■ iiiiiglum 11111110113 1111111
■ 1111111elL AI � ■ , i
llgillia 111.11
Wino dila lbw gm, r 2 =3, = spur.: 2
4 r, umnowl .
uutsuli'1�MEM��■� St :::LaIIkIiar'I■ ii1i
%►�_ hi ■�
1 �� mum m 'iii 1II ,r
��i/11 ■ Nt-'sty ic•i� IIIA ■I
1111 =IR Sill
wow awn sis mi_ no_
_ _ ERR ••• '
NMI riv a LI ifi raw NNE r BE la Noilinai
smilli"
■ M 11,
MOW, fiiiiiiinim If/Wm --1-1
raily 414 it� gis) mii
FL" mea -.. pIIi. Ii-
!�IIi. Q �
4III% : .
E��111/�� Eiu• . n ■ ������:J
../11111111 ►E 6th S 1 ■FI__a! II
- 111 n l.documentisa g aphk resentaCbn,not quo ont.ed
num tosurvey xcurxy,intendedrorNty Wryous 2,1 andsm MI Dosed on the best nfom+obon ovoidal.m of the dote Noon�� This mop is for display purposes only.
Querin II Annexation 0 800 1600
Figure 1:Vicinity Map
1 : 9600
GtiT O Economic Development,Neighborhoods&Strategic Planning — — Renton City Limits
4.7*, Alex Pietsch,Administrator
P G.Del Rosario ® Original Annexation Area
lNTO 18 January 2006
:- Proposed Annexation Area
/5/- eadmg /0-9-aDo 6
iidopled /D- /4.- 't 0O
CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON
ORDINANCE NO. moo2.25'
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON
ESTABLISHING THE ZONING CLASSIFICATION OF CERTAIN
PROPERTY ANNEXED WITHIN THE CITY OF RENTON FROM R-4
(URBAN RESIDENTIAL 4DU PER ACRE, KING COUNTY ZONING) TO
R-4 (RESIDENTIAL 4 DU/AC; FOUR DWELLING UNITS PER NET
ACRE) (QUERIN II ANNEXATION; FILE NO.A-05-003).
WHEREAS, under Section 4.2.020 of Chapter 2,Zoning Districts—Uses and Standards,
of Title IV (Development Regulations) of Ordinance No. 4260 entitled "Code of General
Ordinances of the City of Renton, Washington," as amended, and the maps and reports adopted
in conjunction therewith, the property hereinbelow described has not been zoned in the City of
Renton; and
WHEREAS, said property owners petitioned the City of Renton for annexation and
concurrent rezoning, which said annexation having previously been approved and the property
annexed to the City of Renton, and the City having held two public hearings to consider this
zoning application, the first hearing being held on October 24, 2005, and the second hearing
being held on November 28, 2005, and said zoning request being in conformity with the City's
Comprehensive Plan, as amended, and the City Council having considered all matters relevant
thereto, and all parties having been heard appearing in support thereof or in opposition thereto;
NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RENTON,
WASHINGTON, DOES ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS:
SECTION I. The following described property in the City of Renton is hereby
zoned to R-4 as hereinbelow specified. The annual ordinance adopting the maps of the City's
Zoning Ordinance is hereby amended to evidence said rezoning and the EDNSP Administrator is
1
ORDINANCE NO.
hereby authorized and directed to change the maps of the Zoning Ordinance, as amended, to
evidence said rezoning, to wit:
See Exhibit "A" attached hereto and made a part hereof as if fully set forth herein.
[Said property, approximately 10.70 acres, is generally located in the portion
north of SE 112th Street, if extended, east of 142nd Avenue SE, and south of NE
Sunset Blvd.]
SECTION II. This Ordinance shall be effective upon its passage,
approval, and 30 days after its publication.
PASSED BY THE CITY COUNCIL this day of , 2006.
Bonnie I. Walton, City Clerk
APPROVED BY THE MAYOR this day of , 2006.
Kathy Keolker, Mayor
Approved as to form:
Lawrence J. Warren, City Attorney
Date of Publication:
ORD.1283:8/29/06:ma
2
•
Exhibit A
•
QUERIN II EXPANDED ANNEXATION PREZONE(R-4)
LEGAL DESCRIPTION
That portion of the Southwest quarter of the Southeast quarter of Section 3, Township 23
North, Range 5 East, W.M., King County, Washington, lying southwesterly, southerly
and southwesterly of the existing City Limits of Renton as annexed by Ordinance No.
4092, and lying easterly of the easterly right-of-way margin of 142nd Ave SE.
Exhibit A
, INN (1) IlliTEE4 r Pv4 IragT4111 t411lMIIIIIPIIII
iff i
ird i a imps . • vaitirris iii" oil
w• I 0 itai = •
�.. ■ 4 a I ■ ■ .� sw oplim �.. .IE
I. al a t
or .1.
P " __ t\IIIII;
, \ <6
G eek 1 .1_f Bogelli MEM IN
at
■oney � . e
:::'-i_.'7-1''-i'-' ,.''''''.:;..\ 111 1111 1/41 $
imm41 k:-:'-=`;,;-1,, , '',','A\ mitio 0
7,-- N
III
r!::}_ '--._
lf
g.
'''-,:,:
r T
‘ ,
i� �
_,
-4r ±
!, ' -,':,''' .''\ ''' mal
�■■ ion. mi
si imam
.I 111111 IIIII imilinimea up 1
. ■mnonil!.
IIIIIIIIIIJ "
.FL\ . ■ g ■1I ka1a1h.i..1aa1
1 r� &!.! I ■
o _ I111
o -t 11111
-
_�,� 11111111111: _�
„` S tmmi 1111 �r■
„„_Iii N.I. an 111101
. Allso
' Lam ■ Thi.document is ayraphkrepresentation,not quaanteed•
■■i■�� --- survey xwrxy.mtended for Gtyoxa only andaed onthebeat iayp. ..,s a mof the dde drownis mop to for diaplaY Durpoeee orgy,
ll
Querin II Expanded Annexation 400 800
aiaii..:__._.._...
R-4 Zoning Map 1 : 4800
Gtiz 0; Economic Development,Neighborhoods&Strategic Planning — — Renton City Limits
♦ ♦ Alex Pietsch,Administrator
�, J`/ G.Del Rosario Proposed R-4 Zoning
Proposed Annexation Boundary
REE�NTo 18 January 2006
Is/tead/4g /°-91- '4°C
,doled /0-/.- oo6
CITY OF RENTON WASHINGTON
ORDINANCE NO. .5;1,25
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON
ESTABLISHING THE ZONING CLASSIFICATION OF CERTAIN
PROPERTY ANNEXED WITHIN THE CITY OF RENTON FROM R-4
(URBAN RESIDENTIAL 4DU PER ACRE, KING COUNTY ZONING) TO
R-8 (RESIDENTIAL 8 DU/AC; EIGHT DWELLING UNITS PER ACRE)
(QUERIN II ANNEXATION; FILE NO. A-05-003).
WHEREAS, under Section 4.2.020 of Chapter 2,Zoning Districts—Uses and Standards,
of Title IV (Development Regulations) of Ordinance No. 4260 entitled "Code of General
Ordinances of the City of Renton, Washington," as amended, and the maps and reports adopted
in conjunction therewith, the property hereinbelow described has not been zoned in the City of
Renton; and
WHEREAS, said property owners petitioned the City of Renton for annexation and
concurrent rezoning, which said annexation having previously been approved and the property
annexed to the City of Renton, and the City having held two public hearings to consider this
zoning application, the first hearing being held on August 7, 2006, and the second hearing being
held on September 11, 2006, and said zoning request being in conformity with the City's
Comprehensive Plan, as amended, and the City Council having considered all matters relevant
thereto, and all parties having been heard appearing in support thereof or in opposition thereto;
NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RENTON,
WASHINGTON, DOES ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS:
SECTION L The following described property in the City of Renton is hereby
zoned to R-4 as hereinbelow specified. The annual ordinance adopting the maps of the City's
Zoning Ordinance is hereby amended to evidence said rezoning and the EDNSP Administrator is
1
ORDINANCE NO.
hereby--authorized and directed to change the maps'of-the-Zoning Ordinance, as amended, to
evidence said rezoning, to wit:
See Exhibit "A" attached hereto and made a part hereof as if fully set forth herein.
[Said property, approximately 12.35 acres, is generally located in that portion
west of 142°d Avenue SE and that portion south of SE 112th Street, if extended.]
SECTION II. This Ordinance shall be effective upon its passage,
approval, and 30 days after its publication.
PASSED BY THE CITY COUNCIL this day of 2006.
Bonnie I. Walton, City Clerk
APPROVED BY THE MAYOR this day of 2006.
Kathy Keolker, Mayor
Approved as to form:
Lawrence J. Warren, City Attorney
Date of Publication:
ORD.1284:8/29/06:ma
2
•
Exhibit A.
QUERIN II EXPANDED ANNEXATION PREZONE(R-8)
LEGAL DESCRIPTION
That portion of the Northeast quarter of the Northwest quarter of the Northeast quarter of
Section 10, Township 23 North, Range 5 East, W.M., King County, Washington, lying
northerly of the south line of the north 165 feet of the south half(1/2) thereof;
LESS the west 30 feet thereof;
TOGETHER WITH that portion of the Southwest quarter of the Southeast quarter of
Section 3, Township 23 North, Range 5 East, W.M., King County, Washington, lying
southerly and easterly of the existing City Limits of Renton as annexed by Ordinance No.
4026, and lying westerly of the westerly right-of-way margin of 142nd Ave SE. •
' ISE '2 multi r, 0-4.7404111 nelwkiimmiliiiimil
Exhibit A
in ffizin Imo • ib, . An,
mi
IIII a _ra ii 4, sprAmsfisii al.. wow
,..w.,
1 mos • w_igistin
mio li
IT a m iri ■ dr ri,-1,7044ww„,,,A,06,filli.. ■ ■ ■�� .. .11
0„,
walsai tic .
min ilsk mg: II
p II. Illoilftivi ll
T— - N
'IV
■
roneYC1I4,4ii :Lii..1; Ill 1‘,..\\.;.,,,,,,,,' c
ililliMil &Iiiill
IN i Fir'
i,,,,,:,-,-;„-:,-,,,,:::?:::::!,
,‘ N'
g miltio6,:„..,,,:,,,4_,,.„
1 �` r';
.iii r , -----,7— lulu, vam
, , , ,
. ,, ,,,,
, _{
.r, , _, _,
wri MI ill
I •
, , ,
, , _
,, , , .,I ■ ■
in, ,. ,,.
,,,:,, pi No 91021 Num
, ,:_ ,,:--t, $1 Nik i11111T7 I' .'
1 gm _ 111111111ki !
OM
0 III
1 111! St
iii1 aiL. i. CTIL.= 1,1 _____ __i.i ________________ rd
I
Iv
iih&iI!swei.c. swim
11......... ---ii eurxy.x7tendedTorNty pwpmea only and tree formation ovuiab e m of tM date shown_� for display purposes only.
Querin II Expanded Annexation 0 400 800
b.m„..J
'' '
R-8 Zoning Map
1 : 4800
GtiZ 0 Economic Development,Neighborhoods&Strategic Planning — -- Renton City Limits
♦ , Alex Pietsch,Administrator
�, G.Del Rosario Proposed Annexation Boundary
�'iNT D 18 January 2006
Proposed R-8 Zoning