Press Alt + R to read the document text or Alt + P to download or print.

No preview available

The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutCouncil 02/07/2005 AGENDA or RENTON CITY COUNCIL REGULAR MEETING February 7,2005 Monday,7:30 p.m. 1. CALL TO ORDER AND PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE 2. ROLL CALL 3. PROCLAMATION: Rotary International Day-February 23, 2005 4. SPECIAL PRESENTATION: Police Department Employee Recognition 5. PUBLIC HEARINGS: a. Mosier II Annexation- 60%Notice of Intent to annex petition for 31 acres located in the vicinity of SE 136th St.,SE 130th St., 142nd Ave. SE, and 144th Ave. SE b. City Code amendment to the definition "Medical Institution" 6. ADMINISTRATIVE REPORT 7. AUDIENCE COMMENT (Speakers must sign up prior to the Council meeting. Each speaker is allowed five minutes. The comment period will be limited to one-half hour. The second audience comment period later on in the agenda is unlimited in duration.) When you are recognized by the Presiding Officer,please walk to the podium and state your name and address for the record, SPELLING YOUR LAST NAME. 8. CONSENT AGENDA The following items are distributed to Councilmembers in advance for study and review, and the recommended actions will be accepted in a single motion. Any item may be removed for further discussion if requested by a Councilmember. a. Approval of Council meeting minutes of January 24,2005. Council concur. b. Mayor Keolker-Wheeler reappoints James Phelan, 2401 NE 24th St.,Renton, 98056, and James Matthew, 223 Garden Ave.N.,Renton,98055,each to the Civil Service Commission for a six- year term expiring 12/31/2010. Council concur. c. Mayor Keolker-Wheeler reappoints Troy Wigestrand, 2102 Queen Ave. NE,Renton, 98056, to the Park Board for a four-year term expiring 6/1/2008. Council concur. d. Administrative,Judicial and Legal Services Department recommends adoption of a resolution formalizing the Nishiwaki Lane street name change approved by Council in June, 2001. Council concur. (See 11.a. for resolution.) e. City Clerk submits petition for street vacation for portion of NE 4th St.,east of Rosario Ave. NE; petitioner City of Renton (VAC-04-006). Refer to Planning/Building/Public Works Administrator; set public hearing on 3/7/2005 to consider the petition. (See 11.b. for resolution setting public hearing.) f. Community Services Department submits CAG-04-145, Sunset Court Park Play Equipment Purchase and Installation; and requests approval of the project, authorization for final pay estimate in the amount of$66,580.43,commencement of 60-day lien period, and release of retained amount of$3,207.15 to Landscape Structures,Inc.,contractor, if all required releases are obtained. Council concur. (CONTINUED ON NEXT PAGE) g. Community Services Department recommends approval of a contract with Richard C. Elliott in the amount of$45,894.11 for the creation, provision,and installation supervision of artwork for the City Center Parking garage. Approval is also sought for the total project budget of $52,774.11; funding for the total project budget is available from the 1%for Art Fund. Refer to Community Services Committee. h. Development Services Division recommends approval, with conditions, of the Cedar Avenue Final Plat; 50 single-family lots on 9.5 acres located in the vicinity of Wells Ave. S., S. 36th St., and Cedar Ave. S. Council concur. (See 11.c. for resolution.) i. Economic Development, Neighborhoods and Strategic Planning Department recommends acceptance of$300,000 in Housing and Urban Development Brownfield Economic Initiative (HUD BEDI) grant funds for plans and designs related to the 1-405 and the Port Quendall redevelopment work. Council concur. j. Finance and Information Services Department recommends approval of two ordinances - one for new fees for utility outstanding balance searches, and one for new fees for special water meter read services. Refer to Finance Committee. k. Finance and Information Services Department recommends approval of a resolution updating signature authorities for depositories and electronic fund transfers for the City, due to personnel changes. Council concur. (See 11.d. for resolution.) 1. Finance and Information Services Department recommends approval of an agreement for information management services with GM2 Systems (George McBride) in the amount of $113,628 for 2005. Refer to Finance Committee. m. Hearing Examiner recommends approval,with conditions,of the Kennydale Court Preliminary Plat; 29 single-family lots on 4.38 acres located on the east side of Edmonds Ave. NE between NE 20th St. and NE 22nd St. Council concur. n. Transportation Systems Division recommends approval of an addendum to the airport lease with Kaynan,Inc. to reflect an overall increase in the Ieased area,increasing the annual rent by$2,050 for a total of$25,945.59 (LAG-84-003). Refer to Transportation (Aviation)Committee. o. Transportation Systems Division recommends approval of an addendum to the airport lease with Bosair,LLC to reflect an increase in the leased area and the Consumer Price Index-Urban rate increase, for a total annual lease of$15,890.29 (LAG-86-003). Refer to Transportation (Aviation)Committee. p. Transportation Systems Division recommends approval of an addendum to the airport lease with Bruce J. Leven to reflect the reduction of the leased area,crediting the lessee approximately $2,173.17 for the difference from 1999 to present (LAG-88-001). Refer to Transportation (Aviation)Committee. q. Transportation Systems Division recommends approval of a contract with King County,Sound Transit, and Pierce Transit to continue the FlexPass Commute Trip Reduction Program for City employees in the amount of$21,450 for 2005-2006. Council concur. (See 11.e. for resolution.) 9. CORRESPONDENCE a. E-mails from John & Stacy Tribble,2106 Lyons Ave. NE,Renton,98059; Robert&Susan Old, 2406 Lyons Ave. NE,Renton, 98059;Dennis Noland, 14326 SE 100th Pl.,Renton, 98059; Wayde Watters, 11608 SE 286th St.,Kent, 98030, and Julie Bonwell, 9616 146th Ave.SE, Renton,98059,concerning the R-1 zone community separators, and expressing support for 50% contiguous mapped open space,reforestation of that open space, 35% limits on site clearing, and clustered development. Refer to Planning and Development Committee. b. E-mail from Paul Walser, 817 Monroe Ave.NE,Renton,98056,regarding the denial of a variance to build a deck on the back of his house. 10. UNFINISHED BUSINESS Topics listed below were discussed in Council committees during the past week. Those topics marked with an asterisk(*)may include legislation. Committee reports on any topics may be held by the Chair if further review is necessary. a. Finance Committee: Lease with Iron Mountain Information Management for City Hall 4th Floor; Renton Community Marketing Campaign Funding&Hamilton/Saunderson Contract b. Planning&Development Committee: City Code Title IV Docket c. Transportation (Aviation)Committee: Liberty Ridge Traffic Concerns (Edmonds Ave SE) d. Utilities Committee: 2005 Water System Plan (CONTINUED ON REVERSE SIDE) . 1r RESOLUTIONS AND ORDINANCES Resolutions: a. Renaming portion of Riverside Dr. to Nishiwaki Lane (see 8.d.) %I r►' b. Setting public hearing on 3/7/2005 for City's petition to vacate NE 4th St. (see 8.e.) c. Cedar Avenue Final Plat(see 8.h.) d. Updating signatures for banking transactions (see 8.k.) e. 2005-2006 FlexPass agreement with King County,Pierce Transit&Sound Transit(see 8.q.) f. 2005 Water System Plan (see 10.d.) Ordinance for second and final reading: Big-box retail uses and Urban Center design guidelines (1st reading 1/24/2005) 12. NEW BUSINESS (Includes Council Committee agenda topics;call 425-430-6512 for recorded information.) 13. AUDIENCE COMMENT 14. ADJOURNMENT • COMMITTEE OF THE WHOLE AGENDA (Preceding Council Meeting) Council Conference Room 6:30 p.m. Emerging Issues Council Chambers Approximately 7:00 p.m. Aquatic Center Policies 11111.'• Hearing assistance devices for use in the Council Chambers are available upon request to the City Clerk • CITY COUNCIL MEETINGS ARE TELEVISED LIVE ON GOVERNMENT ACCESS CHANNEL 21 AND ARE RE-CABLECAST TUES.&THURS.AT 11:00 AM&9:00 PM,WED.&FRI.AT 9:00 AM&7:00 PM AND SAT.&SUN.AT 1:00 PM&9:00 PM J RENTON CITY COUNCIL Regular Meeting February 7,2005 Council Chambers Monday,7:30 p.m. MINUTES Renton City Hall CALL TO ORDER Mayor Kathy Keolker-Wheeler called the meeting of the Renton City Council to order and led the Pledge of Allegiance to the flag. ROLL CALL OF RANDY CORMAN, Council President Pro Tern;DENIS LAW;DAN COUNCILMEMBERS CLAWSON;TONI NELSON;DON PERSSON; MARCIE PALMER. MOVED BY CLAWSON, SECONDED BY LAW, COUNCIL EXCUSE ABSENT COUNCILMEMBER TERRI BRIERE. CARRIED. CITY STAFF IN KATHY KEOLKER-WHEELER,Mayor; JAY COVINGTON, Chief ATTENDANCE Administrative Officer; ZANETTA FONTES,Assistant City Attorney; BONNIE WALTON,City Clerk; GREGG ZIMMERMAN, Planning/Building/Public Works Administrator;ALEX PIETSCH,Economic Development Administrator;DON ERICKSON, Senior Planner;REBECCA LIND,Planner Manager; SHAWNA MULHALL,Development Manager; DEREK TODD,Assistant to the CAO;CHIEF LEE WHEELER and DEPUTY CHIEF LARRY RUDE,Fire Department; CHIEF GARRY ANDERSON, COMMANDER CHARLES MARSALISI,COMMANDER KATIE MCCLINCY,COMMANDER TIM TROXEL, and COMMANDER KENT CURRY,Police Department. PROCLAMATION . A proclamation by Mayor Keolker-Wheeler was read declaring the day of Rotary International Day - February 23,2005, to be "Rotary International Day" in the City of Renton and February 23, 2005 encouraging all citizens to join in recognizing Rotary International for 100 years of service to improving the human condition in local communities around the world. MOVED BY LAW, SECONDED BY PERSSON, COUNCIL CONCUR IN THE PROCLAMATION AS READ. CARRIED. Dr. Dolores Gibbons,Rotary Club of Renton President, accepted the proclamation with appreciation. She explained that over the past two years, the Renton Rotary Club has donated several hundred thousand dollars to local and international causes including the technology building at Renton Technical College, the Rotary Salvation Army Food Bank capital campaign,Rotary First Harvest(food gathering program), Communities in Schools,the Vision House capital campaign, and the City of Renton's Summer Camp and River Days. Additionally,Dr. Gibbons noted Renton Rotary's partnerships with the City of Renton for the Senior Activity Center Thanksgiving Dinner and with the Renton RotaCare Clinic. SPECIAL PRESENTATION Police Chief Garry Anderson explained that Washington State law enforcement Police: Special Olympics personnel are the largest contributors to the Special Olympics of Washington. Contributors &Employee Last year,police department employees statewide helped raise more than Recognition $275,000 for special athletes. Chief Anderson recognized the following Renton community members for their assistance in fundraising efforts for this program: Jeff and Melinda Lawrence,Whistle Stop Ale House owners;Renton Fred Meyer Store employees;and Renton DeMolay. Chief Anderson then announced the following Police Department Employees of the Quarter awards for 2004: February 7,2005 Renton City Council Minutes Page 38 Employee of the First Quarter: no one was selected Employee of the Second Quarter: Dianne Ford,Traffic Controller Employee of the Third Quarter: Detective Christine Mathews Employee of the Fourth Quarter: Tina Harris,Domestic Violence Court Advocate Chief Anderson noted that Ms. Harris was also chosen as the Police Department Employee of the Year for 2004. Continuing,Chief Anderson presented Shirley Rickman, Crime Analyst, with the Chiefs Special Recognition Award for her exemplary analytical skills. Additionally,Tracy Wilkinson was recognized for his promotion to Sergeant. Finally, Chief Anderson announced that Officer Marty Leverton was the recipient of the first Distinguished Service Medal ever awarded by the Renton Police Department,for risking his life to rescue a woman who attempted to commit suicide. RECESS MOVED BY NELSON,SECONDED BY CORMAN, COUNCIL RECESS FOR THREE MINUTES. CARRIED. Time: 8:02 p.m. The meeting was reconvened at 8:05 p.m.;roll was called; all Councilmembers present except Briere,previously excused. PUBLIC HEARINGS This being the date set and proper notices having been posted and published in Annexation: Mosier II, 142nd accordance with local and State laws,Mayor Keolker-Wheeler opened the Ave SE& 144th Ave SE public hearing to consider the 60%Notice of Intent to annex petition and R-4 zoning for the proposed Mosier II Annexation consisting of 31 acres, including the abutting street right-of-way, located between 142nd Ave. SE on the west and 144th Ave. SE(Jericho Ave. NE)on the east, south of NE 2nd St., if extended. Don Erickson, Senior Planner,explained that the original 35.24-acre petition submitted in June,2003,was unsuccessful in achieving signatures representing 60% of the area's assessed value. The petition was resubmitted in June,2004, for 10.40 acres. At the public meeting on August 23,2004,the Council agreed to expand the boundaries,increasing the annexation area to 31 acres. Mr. Erickson pointed out that as it stands now,if this area were annexed, a 13-lot subdivision located to the north of the annexation area will become an unincorporated island. Staff recommends including this subdivision with the annexation area by invoking jurisdiction at the Boundary Review Board and requesting its inclusion. Mr. Erickson stated that eight single-family dwellings exist on this relatively level site, and noted that a branch of Maplewood Creek runs southwest of the site draining wetlands to the west of 142nd Ave. SE. He reported that the site is served by Fire District#25,Water District#90,Renton sewer, and the Renton School District. Continuing,Mr.Erickson indicated that current King County zoning for the site is R-4(four dwellings per gross acre). Renton's Comprehensive Plan designates the site as Residential Low Density,for which R-4 (four dwelling units per net acre)zoning is proposed. He noted that the site is one of three former R-5 sites grandfathered in as to density at a maximum of five dwelling units per net acre. February 7,2005 Renton City Council Minutes Page 39 Mr. Erickson stated that the fiscal impact analysis indicates a surplus of $28,249 at full development, assuming a potential of 118 single-family homes and an assessed new home value of$425,000. The estimated one-time parks acquisition and development cost is$66,077. In conclusion, he said the annexation proposal furthers City business goals, and is consistent with Renton policies. Public comment was invited. Brian Leitch, 14217 SE 136th St.,Renton,98059, stated that his five-acre parcel is located directly south of the proposed annexation area, and he requested the inclusion of his property in the annexation. Mr. Leitch indicated that his property,consisting of two taxation parcels, is bounded by SE 136th St. on the north, and 143rd Ave. SE on the east. Mr. Erickson explained that staff is already requesting authorization to invoke jurisdiction at the Boundary Review Board to expand the boundaries for the subdivision to the north, and Mr.Leitch's property could be included in that request. Alex Pietsch,Economic Development Administrator, suggested that to allow for further staff investigation,the staff recommendation be changed to state "invoke jurisdiction at the Boundary Review Board requesting the expansion to more reasonable boundaries." Mayor Keolker-Wheeler clarified that the intent is to include the 13-lot subdivision,Mr. Leitch's parcel, and any other contiguous parcels that may want to annex. Alan Miller, 13568 139th Pl. SE, Renton, 98059, expressed his concern regarding traffic flow along SE 136th St.,noting that the increased density along Duvall Ave. NE has led to increased traffic in this area. He also noted that the misaligned intersection of Duvall Ave. SE and NE 4th St. creates traffic problems. Pointing out that continuing SE 136th St. all the way through would result in increased traffic flow,Mr. Miller requested that continuation of the street not be allowed. Additionally, he expressed his appreciation for the R-4 zoning of the area. Mayor Keolker-Wheeler explained that this public hearing concerns the annexation proposal, and pointed out that citizens will have opportunity during the development process to express concerns regarding development issues. There being no further public comment, it was MOVED BY CLAWSON, SECONDED BY NELSON,COUNCIL CLOSE THE PUBLIC HEARING. CARRIED. MOVED BY CLAWSON, SECONDED BY PERSSON, COUNCIL ACCEPT THE MOSIER II 60%DIRECT PETITION TO ANNEX; SUPPORT R-4 ZONING CONSISTENT WITH THE CURRENT COMPREHENSIVE PLAN LAND USE DESIGNATION; AND AUTHORIZE THE ADMINISTRATION TO SUBMIT THE NOTICE OF INTENT PACKAGE TO THE BOUNDARY REVIEW BOARD,INVOKE JURISDICTION AT THE BOUNDARY REVIEW BOARD REQUESTING THE EXPANSION TO MORE REASONABLE BOUNDARIES,AND PREPARE THE NECESSARY REZONE AND ANNEXATION ORDINANCES. CARRIED. February 7,2005 .Renton City Council Minutes Page 40 Planning: Medical Institution This being the date set and proper notices having been posted and published in Definition, City Code accordance with local and State laws,Mayor Keolker-Wheeler opened the Amendment public hearing to consider City Code Title IV (Development Regulations) amendments to the definition of"Medical Institution." Alex Pietsch,Economic Development Administrator, stated that a property owner and an interested business wanted to request a Comprehensive Plan amendment and rezone of a property to take advantage of a particular land use at a single location. Upon review of City Code, it was discovered that some of the existing definitions were out of date with evolving medical industry practices; thus a City Code amendment is being sought that will address this matter and also be applicable Citywide. Rebecca Lind,Planner Manager, explained that the proposed land use is for a holistic health clinic involving non-traditional medical practitioners and a short- term in-patient facility, with massage,non-traditional therapy, retail, and gardens as accessory activities. She indicated that the existing zoning code definitions of"Medical Institution," "Medical Office," "Office," and "Convalescent Facility" were not appropriate for this use; however, the definition "Medical Institution" most closely described the proposed activity. Ms.Lind pointed out that "Medical Institution" includes physical or mental health services,in-patient accommodations,medical and surgical care,and hospitals; and excludes medical and dental offices, convalescent centers, retirement residences, and group homes. Ms. Lind stated that staff recommends adding a definition of"Holistic Health Center" as a type of activity to the zoning code, and then add it into the "Medical Institution" definition as an included use along with hospitals. The new definition combines a number of activities intended for the improvement or maintenance of health,allowing both outpatient and inpatient care and various supporting accessory activities. Continuing,Ms. Lind explained that the proposed City Code amendment includes the holistic health activity within the "Medical Institution" land use. The amendment also continues the Hearing Examiner conditional use permit for this type of land use activity in all zones. Additionally,the amendment includes moving the hospice facility from the "Convalescent Center" definition to the "Medical Institution" definition, and removing the term sanitarium from the "Medical Institution" definition. Public comment was invited. There being none, it was MOVED BY CLAWSON, SECONDED BY LAW,COUNCIL CLOSE THE PUBLIC HEARING. CARRIED. MOVED BY CLAWSON, SECONDED BY LAW, COUNCIL SUSPEND THE RULES AND ADVANCE TO THE PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT COMMITTEE REPORT ON THIS SUBJECT. CARRIED. Planning & Development Planning and Development Committee Chair Clawson presented a report Committee recommending concurrence in the staff recommendation to approve an Planning: Medical Institution amendment to the definition of"Medical Institution." The Committee further Definition,City Code recommended that the ordinance regarding this matter be presented for first Amendment reading. MOVED BY CLAWSON, SECONDED BY LAW,COUNCIL CONCUR IN THE COMMITTEE REPORT. CARRIED. February 7,2005 Renton City Council Minutes Page 41 ADMINISTRATIVE Chief Administrative Officer Jay Covington reviewed a written administrative REPORT report summarizing the City's recent progress towards goals and work programs adopted as part of its business plan for 2005 and beyond. Items noted included: * Last week, students from Renton High School helped put together a display in the lobby of City Hall showcasing Black History Month. The display will be featured through the end of the month. * A Fitness Pass Special is being offered through March at the Renton Community Center. A monthly pass is $19.95, and a one-year pass is$200. Rates vary for Renton residents, students and seniors, and non-residents. * As part of Renton's required 2004 Growth Management update, the City's draft Critical Areas Ordinance is now available for public review and comment either electronically on the City's website at www.ci.renton.wa.us or at the Economic Development,Neighborhoods and Strategic Planning Department on the 6th floor of City Hall. AUDIENCE COMMENT Roy Bala, 1416 NE 30th St.,#4,Renton, 98056,expressed his interest in Citizen Comment: Bala- renting a house located on City-owned property at 1404 NE 30th St.,which is House Rental Proposal, City- intended for future Fire Station#15. Mr.Bala stated that he submitted a Owned Property,NE 30th St proposal regarding the matter that includes improving the structure. He also noted that the Fire Department intends to seek a permit to conduct a practice burn on the house,and before that occurs, he asked Council to consider his proposal. Councilman Clawson stated that the income generation is appealing; however, there may be a request for proposals requirement. He suggested that the Administration investigate the matter. Mayor Keolker-Wheeler indicated that it would cost approximately $20,000 to bring the house up to code before it could be rented out. She explained that while the City has considered rental agreements with non-profit organizations, the City is not interested in renting to individuals. The Mayor stated that the City does intend to demolish the house. Councilman Corman encouraged Mr. Bala to find other distressed properties to rent and fix up,especially if he has those types of skills. CONSENT AGENDA Items on the consent agenda are adopted by one motion which follows the listing. Council Meeting Minutes of Approval of Council meeting minutes of January 24,2005. Council concur. January 24,2005 Appointment: Civil Service Mayor Keolker-Wheeler reappointed James Phelan, 2401 NE 24th St.,Renton, Commission 98056,and James Matthew,223 Garden Ave. N.,Renton,98055,each to the Civil Service Commission for a six-year term expiring 12/31/2010. Council concur. Appointment: Park Board Mayor Keolker-Wheeler reappointed Troy Wigestrand,2102 Queen Ave.NE, Renton,98056 to the Park Board for a four-year term expiring 6/1/2008. Council concur. Streets: Nishiwaki Lane Administrative,Judicial and Legal Services Department recommended adoption Rename from N Riverside Dr of a resolution formalizing the Nishiwaki Lane street name change approved by Council in June, 2001. Council concur. (See page 44 for resolution.) February 7,2005 Renton City Council Minutes Page 42 Vacation: NE 4th St, City of City Clerk submitted petition for street vacation for portion of NE 4th St.,east Renton,VAC-04-006 of Rosario Ave. NE; petitioner City of Renton (VAC-04-006). Refer to Planning/Building/Public Works Administrator; set public hearing on 3/7/2005 to consider the petition. (See page 44 for resolution setting public hearing.) CAG: 04-145, Sunset Court Community Services Department submits CAG-04-145, Sunset Court Park Play Park Play Equipment, Equipment Purchase and Installation; and requested approval of the project, Landscape Structures authorization for final pay estimate in the amount of$66,580.43, commencement of 60-day lien period, and release of retained amount of $3,207.15 to Landscape Structures, Inc.,contractor,if all required releases are obtained. Council concur. Community Services: City Community Services Department recommended approval of a contract with Center Parking Artwork, Richard C.Elliott in the amount of$45,894.11 for the creation,provision, and Richard C Elliott installation supervision of artwork for the City Center Parking garage. Approval was also sought for the total project budget of$52,774.11;funding for the total project budget is available from the 1% for Art Fund. Refer to Community Services Committee. Plat: Cedar Avenue,Wells Development Services Division recommended approval, with conditions,of the Ave S,FP-04-137 Cedar Avenue Final Plat; 50 single-family lots on 9.5 acres located in the vicinity of Wells Ave. S., S. 36th St.,and Cedar Ave. S. (FP-04-137). Council concur. (See page 44 for resolution.) Planning: I-405 &Port Economic Development,Neighborhoods and Strategic Planning Department Quendall Redevelopment, recommended acceptance of$300,000 in Housing and Urban Development HUD Grant Brownfield Economic Initiative (HUD BEDI)grant funds for plans and designs related to the 1-405 and Port Quendall redevelopment work. Council concur. Finance: Outstanding Balance Finance and Information Services Department recommended approval of two Search Fees &Special Water ordinances -one for new fees for utility outstanding balance searches,and one Meter Read Service Fees for new fees for special water meter read services. Refer to Finance Committee. Finance: Signatures for Finance and Information Services Department recommended approval of a Banking Transactions resolution updating signature authorities for depositories and electronic fund transfers for the City,due to personnel changes. Council concur. (See page 44 for resolution.) Finance: Information Finance and Information Services Department recommended approval of an Management Services,GM2 agreement for information management services with GM2 Systems (George Systems McBride)in the amount of$113,628 for 2005. Refer to Finance Committee. Plat: Kennydale Court, Hearing Examiner recommended approval, with conditions,of the Kennydale Edmonds Ave NE,PP-04-085 Court Preliminary Plat; 29 single-family lots on 4.38 acres located on the east side of Edmonds Ave. NE between NE 20th St. and NE 22nd St. (PP-04-085). Council concur. Lease: Kaynan Addendum Transportation Systems Division recommended approval of an addendum to the #10, Airport,LAG-84-003 airport lease with Kaynan, Inc. to reflect an overall increase in the leased area, increasing the annual rent by$2,050 for a total of$25,945.59 (LAG-84-003). Refer to Transportation(Aviation)Committee. Lease,Bosair Addendum#3, Transportation Systems Division recommended approval of an addendum to the Airport,LAG-86-003 airport lease with Bosair,LLC to reflect an increase in the leased area and the Consumer Price Index-Urban rate increase,for a total annual lease of $15,890.29(LAG-86-003). Refer to Transportation (Aviation)Committee. February 7,2005 Renton City Council Minutes Page 43 Lease: Bruce J Leven Transportation Systems Division recommended approval of an addendum to the Addendum#7,Airport,LAG- airport lease with Bruce J. Leven to reflect the reduction of the leased area, 88-001 crediting the lessee approximately$2,173.17 for the difference from 1999 to present(LAG-88-001). Refer to Transportation(Aviation)Committee. Transportation: FlexPass Transportation Systems Division recommended approval of a contract with Program,King County& King County, Sound Transit, and Pierce Transit to continue the FlexPass Sound Transit&Pierce Transit Commute Trip Reduction Program for City employees in the amount of $21,450 for 2005-2006. Council concur. (See page 44 for resolution.) MOVED BY CORMAN, SECONDED BY LAW, COUNCIL APPROVE THE CONSENT AGENDA AS PRESENTED. CARRIED. CORRESPONDENCE Correspondence was read from John&Stacy Tribble, 2106 Lyons Ave. NE, Citizen Comment: Various - Renton, 98059;Robert&Susan Old, 2406 Lyons Ave. NE,Renton, 98059; R-1 Zone Community Dennis Noland, 14326 SE 100th Pl.,Renton,98059; Wayde Watters, 11608 SE Separators 286th St., Kent, 98030; and Julie Bonwell, 9616 146th Ave. SE, Renton, 98059; concerning the R-1 zone community separators, and expressing support for 50%contiguous mapped open space,reforestation of that open space, 35% limits on site clearing, and clustered development. MOVED BY LAW, SECONDED BY CLAWSON, COUNCIL REFER THIS CORRESPONDENCE TO THE PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT COMMITTEE. CARRIED. Citizen Comment: Walser- Correspondence was read from Paul Walser, 817 Monroe Ave. NE,Renton, Variance Denial for Deck at 98056,regarding the denial of a variance to build a deck on the back of his Residence,Monroe Ave NE house. MOVED BY LAW, SECONDED BY CORMAN, COUNCIL REFER THIS CORRESPONDENCE TO THE ADMINISTRATION. CARRIED. Councilman Clawson commented that Council has no authority to overrule the decision, and Mr. Walser can pursue the matter via the appeal process. The Mayor noted the potential of the matter coming before Council on appeal, depending on what happens during the process. UNFINISHED BUSINESS Finance Committee Chair Persson presented a report recommending Finance Committee concurrence in the staff recommendation to approve the contract with EDNSP: Hotel/Motel Tax Hamilton/Saunderson Marketing Partnership,marketing consultants, for a Revenue Allocation to seventh year of the Renton Community Marketing Campaign, and partner with Community Stakeholders, other key community stakeholders by allocating$50,000 of hotel/motel tax Hamilton/Saunderson Contract collections towards that effort. The allocation will be leveraged with additional financial contributions from the Economic Development,Neighborhoods and Strategic Planning Department's "business recruitment" budget and other community agencies,organizations, and businesses to total $120,000. The Committee further recommended that the Mayor and City Clerk be authorized to sign the contract.* Councilman Persson noted that the hotel/motel tax is collected from the rental of hotel and motel rooms, and per State law,can only be used for purposes such as this. *MOVED BY PERSSON, SECONDED BY NELSON,COUNCIL CONCUR IN THE COMMITTEE REPORT. CARRIED. Lease: Iron Mountain Finance Committee Chair Persson presented a report recommending Information Management, City concurrence in the staff recommendation to approve the five-year lease Hall 4th Floor,LAG-00-003 amendment with Iron Mountain Information Systems,Inc., with options for two five-year extensions, for continued tenancy of the fourth floor of Renton City P February 7,2005 Renton City Council Minutes Page 44 Hall. The Committee further recommended that the Mayor and City Clerk be authorized to sign lease amendment No. 2 with lion Mountain Information Systems,Inc. MOVED BY PERSSON, SECONDED BY NELSON, COUNCIL CONCUR IN THE COMMITTEE REPORT. CARRIED. Planning& Development Planning and Development Committee Chair Clawson presented a report Committee recommending concurrence in the staff recommendation to set a public hearing Planning: Development date of 2/28/2005 for the 2004 Title IV (Development Regulations)City Code Regulations (Title IV)2004 docket and related amendments. This subject will remain in Committee for Docket Work Program further review and consideration. MOVED BY CLAWSON, SECONDED BY LAW,COUNCIL CONCUR IN THE COMMITTEE REPORT. CARRIED. Utilities Committee Utilities Committee Chair Colman presented a report recommending Utility: Water System Plan, concurrence in the staff recommendation to adopt the 2005 update to the Water 2005 Update System Plan and to forward the plan to King County and the Washington State Department of Health for approval. The Committee further recommended that the resolution regarding this matter be presented for reading and adoption. MOVED BY CORMAN, SECONDED BY CLAWSON,COUNCIL CONCUR IN THE COMMITTEE REPORT. CARRIED. (See later this page for resolution.) RESOLUTIONS AND The following resolutions were presented for reading and adoption: ORDINANCES Resolution#3734 A resolution was read renaming a portion of N. Riverside Dr. to Nishiwaki Streets: Nishiwaki Lane Lane in honor of Renton's Sister City relationship with Nishiwaki,Japan. Rename from N Riverside Dr MOVED BY LAW, SECONDED BY CORMAN, COUNCIL ADOPT THE RESOLUTION AS READ. CARRIED. Resolution#3735 A resolution was read setting a public hearing date on 3/7/2005 for vacating a Vacation: NE 4th St,City of portion of NE 4th St.,east of Rosario Ave.NE(Petitioner: City of Renton; Renton,VAC-04-006 VAC-04-006). MOVED BY CLAWSON,SECONDED BY CORMAN, COUNCIL ADOPT THE RESOLUTION AS READ. CARRIED. Resolution#3736 A resolution was read approving the Cedar Avenue Final Plat consisting of Plat: Cedar Avenue,Wells approximately 9.5 acres located in the vicinity of Wells Ave. S., S. 36th St., and Ave S,FP-04-137 Cedar Ave. S. (FP-04-137). MOVED BY CORMAN, SECONDED BY CLAWSON, COUNCIL ADOPT THE RESOLUTION AS READ. CARRIED. Resolution#3737 A resolution was read authorizing signature for depositories and electronic fund Finance: Signatures for transfers on behalf of and in the name of the City of Renton. MOVED BY Banking Transactions LAW,SECONDED BY PALMER, COUNCIL ADOPT THE RESOLUTION AS READ. CARRIED. Resolution#3738 A resolution was read authorizing the Mayor and City Clerk to enter into an Transportation: FlexPass interlocal cooperative agreement with King County, Sound Transit, and Pierce Program,King County& Transit for the sale of FlexPasses to City of Renton employees by King County. Sound Transit&Pierce Transit MOVED BY LAW, SECONDED BY NELSON, COUNCIL ADOPT THE RESOLUTION AS READ. CARRIED. Resolution#3739 A resolution was read adopting the City of Renton's 2005 Water System Plan. Utility: Water System Plan, MOVED BY CORMAN, SECONDED BY CLAWSON, COUNCIL ADOPT 2005 Update THE RESOLUTION AS READ. CARRIED. February 7,2005 Renton City Council Minutes Page 45 The following ordinance was presented for second and final reading and adoption: Ordinance#5124 An ordinance was read amending Sections 4-2-060,4-2-070, and 4-2-080, of Planning: Big-Box Retail Uses Chapter 2,Zoning Districts-Uses and Standards, and Section 4-3-100 of Design Guidelines &Urban Chapter 3,Environmental Regulations and Overlay Districts, and Chapter 11, Center Design Overlay Definitions,of Title IV (Development Regulations)of City Code by revising Regulations the Urban Center Design Overlay Regulations for development in the Urban Center. MOVED BY CLAWSON, SECONDED BY LAW, COUNCIL ADOPT THE ORDINANCE AS READ. ROLL CALL: ALL AYES. CARRIED. NEW BUSINESS MOVED BY PERSSON,SECONDED BY CORMAN, COUNCIL REFER ITS Council: Filling Council POLICY AND PROCEDURE ENTITLED "FILLING COUNCIL Vacancies Policy(#800-10) VACANCIES" (#800-10)TO THE COMMITTEE OF THE WHOLE. CARRIED. EXECUTIVE SESSION MOVED BY CORMAN, SECONDED BY NELSON, COUNCIL RECESS AND ADJOURNMENT INTO EXECUTIVE SESSION FOR 30 MINUTES TO DISCUSS LITIGATION WITH NO OFFICIAL ACTION TO BE TAKEN AND THAT THE COUNCIL MEETING BE ADJOURNED WHEN THE EXECUTIVE SESSION IS ADJOURNED. CARRIED. Time: 9:07 p.m. Executive session was conducted. There was no action taken. The executive session and the Council meeting djou9:37 p.m. / C Bonnie I. Walton, CMC, City Clerk Recorder: Michele Neumann February 7,2005 RENTON CITY COUNCIL COMMITTEE MEETING CALENDAR Office of the City Clerk COUNCIL COMMITTEE MEETINGS SCHEDULED AT CITY COUNCIL MEETING February 7, 2005 COMMITTEE/CHAIRMAN DATE/TIME AGENDA COMMITTEE OF THE WHOLE MON., 2/14 Harvest Partners Conceptual Development (Briere) 6:00 p.m. Plan for Lakeshore Landing Briefing; Pavilion Building Proposals and Recommendation COMMUNITY SERVICES MON., 2/14 City Center Parking Garage Artwork (Nelson) 4:00 p.m. Contract with Richard C. Elliott FINANCE MON., 2/14 Vouchers; (Persson) 4:30 p.m. Ordinances for New Fees for Utility Outstanding Balance Searches &for Special Water Meter Read Services; 2005/2006 Claims Processing Fee Schedule with Healthcare Management Administrators PLANNING&DEVELOPMENT THURS., 2/10 2004 City Code Title IV Docket; (Clawson) 2:00 p.m. R-1 Zone Community Separators PUBLIC SAFETY (Law) TRANSPORTATION (AVIATION) (Palmer) UTILITIES (Corman) NOTE: Committee of the Whole meetings are held in the Council Chambers. All other committee meetings are held in the Council Conference Room unless otherwise noted. CITY OF RENTON Mayor hill Kathy Keolker-Wheeler err► prodcuvnatto-n, Whetrea4; Rotary International, founded on February 23, 1905, in Chicago, Illinois, is the world's first and one of the largest non-profit service organizations; and Wherect,; there are over 1.2 million Rotary club members comprised of professional and business leaders in over 31,000 clubs in more than 165 countries; and Wherect-, the Rotary motto "Service Above Self" inspires members to provide humanitarian service, encourage high ethical standards, and promote good will and peace in the world; and Whereat, Rotary funds club projects and sponsors volunteers with community expertise to provide medical supplies, health care, clean water, food production,jc4b training, and education to millions in need, particularly in developing countries; and Wherecw, in 1985, Rotary launched the "Polio Plus"program and spearheaded efforts with the World Health Organization, U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, and UNICEF to immunize the children of the world against polio; and Ilase W herea', polio cases have dropped by 99 percent since 1988 and the world stands on the threshold of eradicating the disease; and Wherecw, Rotary is the world's largest privately-funded source of international scholarships and promotes international understanding through scholarships, exchange programs, and humanitarian grants; and Wherea46 more than 35,000 students from 110 countries have studied abroad since 1947 as Rotary Ambassadorial Scholars; and W herea'; Rotary's Group Study Exchange program has helped more than 46,000 young professionals explore their career fields in other countries; and W herecw, 8,000 secondary-school students each year experience life in another country through Rotary's Youth Exchange Program; and Wherea4; there are 100 Rotary club members in Renton sponsoring service projects to address such critical issues as poverty,health, hunger, scholarship, illiteracy, and the environment in their local communities, and abroad; Nrari 1055 South Grady Way-Renton,Washington 98055-(425)430-6500/FAX(425)430-6523 RENTON 4tv AHEAD OF THE CURVE IL, This paper contains 50%recycled material,30%post consumer Now, there fo-rem, I, Kathy Keolker-Wheeler, Mayor of the City of Renton, do hereby proclaim February 23,2005,to be Z ota,Yy I vitor nattDay in the City of Renton, and I encourage all citizens to join me in recognizing Rotary International for 100 years of service to improving the human condition in local communities around the world. In witness whereof, I have hereunto set my hand and caused the seal of the City of Renton to be affixed this 7`h day of February, 2005. Kathy Keolker-Wheeler Mayor of the City of Renton, Washington .., THIS IS A TREE THAT WAS NEVER CHOPPED DOWN To MAK* A CUTCH THAT WAS WREN 011111AIO BY A CML.1:11 WHO 101111110111111 GOT POLIO IIIIIICINJNISSE IIIIIMX4ING WAS MOO ON IMINICIM SUIPIPPILY v.k..1,414 'I' Allit.`004% PP MANIOUll TO PSS IIIMNINI 40111411111INIMOSIIiiiiiiiireiNII44` ' " '' • 4$"41.4 ' .<0',k;r.' ,',:'' '''''' '''''ti" ,,,*:' r T II 4.* , '.r)' ire) ' 1 ' ' . :II Mfr) r ILA_A 11.10,- Over the past twenty years. Rotary club members have .1,14 4,111.. 0".. helped inlinunize over two bilhon children against poo. (:) klii „ L.," Rotary. Thanks to them the world will soon be polio-tree A.„:„..,.I - 7"..., A Hiirriviritty in motion. i• *.li'y 11'1 • RENTON ROTARY CAPER CHARITABLE DISTRIBUTIONS 2003-2005 CHARITY 2003-2004 2004-2005* RTC--Technology Bldg $ 20,000.00 Salvation Army $ 5,000.00 $ 50,000.00 Scholarships' $ 12,000.00 $ 12,000.00 Teacher Recognition $ 2,500.00 $ 1,200.00 Student Recognition $ 987.86 $ 100.00 Christmas Baskets $ 1,600.00 $0.00 Rotary First Harvest $ 4,126.01 $ 4,000.00 Renton Food Bank $ 3,676.00 $ 1,255.00 RAYS $ 3,000.00 Communities in Schools $ 4,000.00 $ 5,000.00 YMCA $ 5,000.00 $ 5,000.00 Lynnwood Literacy Project $ 250.00 Variety Club $ 1,000.00 Vision House $ 10,000.00 $ 5,000.00 UofW Alzheimer Fund $ 5,000.00 NW Burn Foundation $ 4,000.00 $ 5,000.00 City of Renton—Summer Cmp $ 4,000.00 Way Back Inn $ 5,000.00 Boy Scouts $ 300.00 1 Renton River Days $ 5,000.00 $ 5,000.00 RHS Excellence in Educ. $ 1,000.00 Thanksgiving Dinner-Seniors $ 1,183.65 $ 1,326.08 Project WARM $ 2,500.00 WWEE $ 1,250.00 $ 1,000.00 Girls State $ 350.00 $ 350.00 Wash. Business Week $ 1,200.00 $ 1,200.00 Renton School District $ 2,000.00 $ 1,500.00 RSD--Satori Scholarships $ 2,000.00 $ 2,000.00 RSD—BRHS Scholarships $ 2,000.00 $ 2,000.00 RTC Scholarships $ 2,200.00 $ 2,000.00 Common Hope $ 1,000.00 India Water Project $ 1,340.00 Rotary District Interni Project $ 500.00 Seattle Rotary--Russian Grant $ 1,000.00 Seattle Rotary--Halo Trust Prj. $ 1,000.00 RotaCare $ 26,859.80 Renton Historical Museum $ 1,500.00 New Horizon School $ 500.00 Red Cross $ 1,000.00 Tsunami Relief Fund $ 14,500.00 Citizen of the Year $ 1,000.00 $ 1,000.00 International Youth Exchange $ 398.13 TOTAL $ 144,823.32 $ 123,829.21 *to date `SY O Nee4.6% MOSIER II ANNEXATION PUBLIC HEARING COUNCIL CONSIDERATION OF PROPOSED ANNEXATION WITH R-4 ZONING February 7,2005 The City is now in receipt of a 60% Direct Petition to Annex from property owners in the proposed Mosier II annexation area representing at least 60% of the area's now 31-acres. The site is located in the City's East Renton Plateau Potential Annexation Area and is primarily designated as Residential Low Density (RLD) on the City's Comprehensive Plan Land Use Map. Because the site currently has County R-4 zoning, it is the City's intent to rezone it to Renton's R-4, four units per net acre zone, consistent with the Comprehensive Plan. With this zoning the site would accommodate approximately 26 additional single-family dwelling units. The annexation site abuts the City on its eastern boundary. The southern boundary of the proposed annexation site is SE 136th Street. With the exception of the half-street of 142nd "' Avenue SE all abutting street right-of-ways not currently in the City are proposed to be included in this annexation. The site is relatively flat and consists of tweleve parcels with an estimated eight detached single-family dwellings on it. If Council decides to accept the 60% Petition and ultimately annex the subject area it is required to hold two public hearings on future zoning for the site (RCW 35.A.14.340). Tonight's public hearing will be the first of these two required hearings on this matter. Before it addresses future zoning for the site the Council must first decide whether it wants to accept the 60% Direct Petition to Annex. It can also decide to reject or geographically modify the proposed annexation boundaries. If the Council decides to accept the 60% Direct Petition to Annex it will typically: 1. Support the Administrations recommendation on future zoning, if it is consistent with the Comprhensive Plan land use designation, and 2. Authorize the Administration to forward the Notice of Intent Package for the annexation to the Boundary Review Board to commence their mandatory 45-day review period.. '�wr► Council Hearing Handout 08-04-03.doc\ t a pi♦ ♦I ♦♦ ta!7wr 1_,_ /I f llr��,�, t VCIAPPi 4 MP editx • Oaf. SNP 41111W Al\ diem ird III irt It 744 111 0 IVA " kt SW../15 /1 A @ ••0.r♦ 4A ■► I. t W 1 1r r� r f i* I� I W.. w-0 00 '10 Oh ofIE Glii Oiim M�1 en imi■L,136t ve, • E - �' G NMI 'll I nI � n -rr ,I it. jr vr fraitsit two.,,,digir- : imiLmi. Ns a MN g i. ' 111.1111iiinal s UUi�`, cin 4,23p „ I�I � *10. 2? eilk I. 7010 1' ., I. IIiw- II II I i! ! I� .. , p , �► I 1 I 1 M� a" s/iiIIPa i*1 IIk 14°th - u�If/n:I& 1 2 e ' cwt/ ii w L m am= WEI FO_ r . fli , 2•41, a IN ..E,vim132WM I ` Alief 2� vet • �� - 1� i �P�IlllltlJ jNEllii-j'—iL ' 114-rd 4'ie S Au I ird Ave SE 4, t — 1 4 t Iii IL k�e�/yE �11 Uiiiilli j`' _,, ,' 'f i ' „,� 1 _r?Fx (. �iiii _ E 1 � 1;; A�7A R � 1 1 III II/ 1 J f j 19 11 Q� Jericho veNE♦ r 45thi v6 Sf iiii ; fIII I � 1145 I`0 Ave' SE L ons ,. - gm. ma imarines III =In gm 1.11kil Una im Man S� ---- -- = :�w.di a his 111111 :%ililiiiiiii : owliEW Ian 441111 �� + I�i■■��, -- R ' : - 4th �vE II ■11111011 • mi 1 4.'., - !►ij14-17 I ill . th hie L ■1iiil01�A: ifil �'j,�� I ' 1�C th +4‘,e-5- -,-P.-- 4 hi._ ■111■�� = r,-'M,'' . ,l A1��i�:s a .1 ,rat �+►��I�t I _=r11I (� -1= . �►��(T Quincy r �E rte. 1. • '?' f/ . /////' --".-, / City of Renton •e M':. ...�' Current AnnexationsL.'",9 _' - . 75 t21a Heodnckwn1 Mk. . « mat= 23_ec_ 1 = -esi_ .11 l �_ F $•. F � atiir io! 4p o 4 !.. ivilldddlun 7 • e. ea " FSIkN is 96x - / ` y , i.. • Inl;t.illy ,uhnuttcd in Jun,'21)t); u,- 35 24 acrc _lnn:van:m • \\VI,iin.tllCe,,I111 in echlcv in_:_n.rturc, �Il11c Y`lfl(n Public }kcal in rcprc,cntin�,(•0'o J'arca ,auc,,nl H IIUC Fchruu)'I' //O` • Rc,ah inttc;l in Iunc 2004 as III 411 a.re ;Intl.'\ltIOfl • :1t puhhc mecunc in Au 11•••t 21w4 C.vn.11 a"rccd to cvp.I nl hoLlndalit:,to t_lbe in,Iv addltion.j1 p:Ircci,to the,outlt. Incr...111/the:11!1,2\anon to I acres Iv z—= .r, a W • P\ \\ Irl R t m',R trntnl A]ncya „ A „, i !�♦ i M NEW._. • Iti'rl Bc 11--imd-stc ,F nthc ,c t .nd . %.-. IIT 144;), A\c SE t I .chu aye\F)mi the t._..nh �7 ■ R S. t�� I of\I ,..„,,,,-.2,1,II od,mdcd " �•7� III"'�•J [^RVIIM! 1 • ■•• dR'.Int Q'► 1 !I !t 1:3/4�i►f. • Si/C i .ICI n.Iudin abut it ttcct RO\\ BVI ' i�Ill�eplll�.11ll. ��n 7 asiA 1Iy • Boun'I m, :I�'abut,Renton on porti,I1 it, v« PTR '� 1 ..I 1e I b,..und tv Jcpatatcd on I1orth b'\ cv ,r_ l -- I I Is91 13 unit I h.ii\tion. `: • MOM \is-inits \1a p Tom;:. 4 7a, �" 1 • ..! • • ',-.3 '.--- -!,-. ri-7- r-7', = -,---,.-•ir. .. -- - , --- , , 7 '''' : --, :,--7-• 2 • i,':, , :7. ,--7,• f... ... -_,. ,... ._ rf, ...,. .._. :1,7'. f.,7 l'' .--:-•'-- ,•,-1 - -1-•-,-. ..,. =. ----, ,- ,_ pg......,,, . N - 0.,,,, r, g a.17 ,•,,, -_., , •;--.!.. , ' -,'-; liri Mal filliPli - ‘..1., 4:isA140th A e •E tril RIM ,...,-.0:. Ba M .ff . Ns 240.4,--:szle.,,;.4:$ T1 _ _ .e . . 11111Mporivioggrailor II . .) :fl7rIatiiralP4 1_ 4,7,''':' . . Tiss.rm _ , la ... L ...11.. In ....,..12.... .um III ,' MI=,NLI'!I ant-At1 ..-. .• 3-1; -, .....~! i --,-.ti-T, min EL'....211.12,..1;.1 MI fil I ' ': ••. .. .. % ' , I, t• ° r" J •-• '• ... #') 4111EM, links! :-,24. ;rei sir,.,.. ,,,i1 ivi. .„.,... i-.1; `•,14,,,,,,•,- 1 ... , IiirrOitz- '''"' ---. iikili 41.h A pir se,.. .... .., ov,a.a.itti m.,-..-,;cia sio ,%-ri - %...‘-. 3144:''Ve 11 . ,A. ...ri. BE ., ,,.. i II unit? gm ...:: -r,--- -,,-,0110,w =ELI '-• 7:-- s. • - ' f, ...,.,,T . ur.,iirie 4.....0,4•A7,.....-z. - -.:... .._,...rjr.„4.4.....= . ___,_,.,,5)6:ca..,u,10.4aw1111.2 7' 1 , =..., 7 q 42.25 11; :31tall ____ffi• i_ Zren E-tol,i_tr Hot., . , 6 A/ 110."W.,j ... ...4 1 I I I_,1 i i i i =,.. i_0111111111122 in•wr. .., .. = 7. ial• Holum -'al trig ill ---... n,,,,,,. El-1 '-- 1/"' 7; - , ,..: ....4 1".. ..._ IT =7. 7-- "./ •-=-7- ,.; _ •- E -T, (.--, r., - = `,-.:' ..:-. ,--- •,,,, _ „.-, 7° 7-. •°' 7--. ,' 7---, -, '''.: 7.- -‘ ,=:, ,7', :=-:: f. - i3-4;•-iii , ,1! „,.. ,,, r, ,,-; -1 . '-It':,,,,_.., ' ,,• .-:” ,.a! "J-. ,..•_ - -4- * K 1 .1 ,L._ ',.-..-. I*' '10t.t2 Atg_'_..._,_,.4 i r. .-{-- L.. rib" ',,,F + • _L' I Oa' -•-' .L2114, .. ...a...4g , - 4,4E. .4,-. • .K. ,1-17--- •••• .., .,.. , . .,.. 1 . sE,,,4,?,,,,,:'°--'•g',,,'., , -4,,,_,4,,-,? '71 - =.• '' 11110,14. --- IE." , ., ... -- , .,.. _ 1 , a ,`-''-', •-•'-2).-1:L.Va--, .';. .;e ,C.:,; „; ' ' -- 6', AY•44; , .i,-4.1,-''', ''''' ( ' fTrill ,‘, ,,-- ,. LS 4 N , -v.ii,..4.. L_,11,...1..:3 IL *. 1 , ......., , .1 T • i -•-ti,,,i0,• ,..., • ,r -.. t en ,... __. - r ,-- _. „.. r 1 •- .f) ... ..4. 1.1 ") ...--: F., i - A'\,,I, f. ... ::.• - i - -- -- . "--- _ -1 - N, ,.._ ,-. _, arw:... , ii,A , . .77. z___.' :: -I,:72 ,,'.... ±r.'C''-=,' -., V.,41.3.L.1,'' ri„lk 4.107"14.11.- .5t • ^-, 1.., • - - , _,.. ci 7-:, / - ,,L.- ^: - r --_:-1: _ - 2 = ' -. , ;.:--.' -, -, , '-= ...' `---.. - ::: = '--2. . .:t = cl- 5 .. :: • ., -.., 7 , _._ , _, ..-r: .-- =- 1 - "L ., - --i' --' - , ..---,__ , - -._ ...,. ,_ • ,.., ... ._• ,,. --e -., - ..- ••••• .-.- 7:: t-- - -- _ - — - , '11 - ...:' ..-_, :. z • • - IN--711111.101111i iiiit; •ip.,E.,F..i,..,• , r... : - :m„"1. 1zt,:Y„utujtii-1.unANii,iii.r..Z--:T.•.3,' ,,., ,......., L' pit , -- 1, ; -.-,,f- ",-r_7--.. , , ,, - , -* - , - , E,-- r , „ • 1111111 .,.., 71 ..... v -- -.. . - ,--' -.' ?---. •,. oi -' .!-- - - - -73 .--.' .'' - '' - - - .7., 7 • - ,) 11•91.,!s -7, 7-:, •, --.1,-,- -_,,-7., - --- - 1, ..., '..4 '- , 74. •I .,.... .45 • ‘.-.''E. ....., .i. _G -, ot :_.% • • • • • • 'nut Coenctl. • Further,Cite 13u,inc,,,Goals ,. 6 r U;r;a P,:uuon I 1nn,A. • (icncrullc con,utcnt tth Cite ann yration pnc�ic, R t i .r.1R-4-omn the • Gencrall.con,isumt v\.ith l its politic,for lo iv cr Lund dcii,iti rcnmcs A-llunHtr:,uon to to t ird t th; • (,)1.1,2:,t1011..11110 am,iaencv ii ith uii 13uundar. RCA fcv+Board critcriun Ic g. lo_ic,iI,cr tcc mca;l r. nm.tr,ttion • Rcicnuc,w Plus at full dciclopmcnt the m u. .. to th..nTill,:n' • Surface\V'ntcr in irate,svmc potcnital floudin pt ,_u:th arca not vi 1111 f iturc LI Pclrpincnt • Eyccpt Clfpark.no inajorserPicc is,ucs idcntilied 1 144,10 v .4 NT sep PUBLIC HEARING HANDOUT Amendment to Title IV(Zoning Code)Definitions Medical Institution February 7,2005 The existing definitions of"Medical Institution,""Medical Office,"and"Convalescent Facility" concludes exclusionary language that prohibits a mixed-use treatment facility that includes components of all of these land uses. The property owner of the existing convalescent facility on Sunset Blvd. is requesting consideration of a code amendment to allow a holistic health facility that combines out-patient treatment, short-term stay,retail products, gardens, doctor's offices, massage, and other forms of physical therapy as part of a"medical institution"use. The "medical institution"use is allowed in all zones in the City with a Hearing Examiner Conditional Use Permit. Recommendation Niro The Planning Commission recommends adoption of the following amendments to the definition of"Medical Institution"to incorporate"holistic health clinics"and"hospice"uses. It is further recommended that the"hospice"language be deleted from"convalescent center." A new definition of"holistic health clinic"is also proposed. Staff concurs in this recommendation. Medical Institutions A facility providing physical or mental health services, in-patient accommodations, and medical or surgical care of the sick or injured. This includes hospitals, clinicf, and sanitariums hospice, and holistic health centers,but excludes medical and dental offices,:-convalescent centers, retirement residences, and group homes I and II. Holistic Health Center A combination of activities intended for improvement or maintenance of health including out- patient and/or in-patient care and supporting accessory activities, and/or including space for medical practitioners,retail sales, educational classrooms and meeting space. Convalescent Centers Facilities for patients who are recovering health and strength after illness or injury, or receiving long-term care for chronic conditions, disabilities,terminal illness where care includes ongoing medical treatment, ' and extended care facilities. This definition does not include retirement residences, adult family homes, group homes II, medical institutions, or secure community transition facilities. Medical Code AmendmentsInstitutionDefinition �,<< February 7,2005 .-. ` . � t _� ° City Council Public Hearing 'Mss age Presentation •Non-traditional therapy •Retail •Gardens ' t `7y 11 t ,6 1^5 t..�, ' s - ` +: '' ¢s i i .,',A$-,-,tiras S - ^' T :'§- k '-,t's : e ::,4*-'.;i';`,4;-:-.:17,.,1:*;','s". —Includes hospitals� t n r .7 �a a: sE",«t.Yt ,..f.:','...,-; :4.?",fitUSce —A place where the affai s'of a business,profession —Excludes medical and dental offices, service or industry are undertaken • Convalescent Facility convalescent centers,retirement residences, —Patients arerecovering health and strength after illness group homes or receiving carefor chronic disability z,,;:„,..t: a, - . S '-"h '` ,. s `STiY eF`t , ' m �'�, .fi . „ as x ., ,:. ;',:t.1,`c 3-, °`y,pi; ', pry I ` i •.,. $. •how mall 4onea'witli a Hearitig CUP Educational ciassroona • Amend definitions to move"hospice" Meeting space from"Convalescent Center to"Medicalfacility Institution" • Amend"Medical Institution"to remove "Sanitarium" 1 PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT COMMITTEE Date .2-7-2005 COMMITTEEE REPORT February 7,2005 "Medical Institution" Definition Exception to Title IV Docket Review Process for a Zoning Code Amendment (Referred Dec. 6, 2004) The Planning and Development Committee recommends concurrence in the staff recommendation to approve an amendment to the definition of"Medical Institution". The Committee further recommends that the ordinance regarding this matter be presented for first reading. sCP -7 Dan Clawson, Chair 1(ctikj, . Zeti"r Denis W. Law, Vice-Chair fYnCatiii (Y01114,- Randy Corman, Member Cc Alex Pietsch Rebecca Lind CITY OF RENTON MEMORANDUM DATE: February 7, 2005 TO: Terri Briere, Council President Members of the Renton City Council FROM: Kathy Keolker-Wheeler, Mayor Jay Covington, Chief Administrative Officer SUBJECT: Administrative Report In addition to our day-to-day activities, the following items are worthy of note for this week: GENERAL INFORMATION • Last week, students from Renton High School helped put together a display in the lobby of City Hall showcasing Black History Month. The display will be featured through the end of the month. ADMINISTRATIVE/JUDICIAL/LEGAL SERVICES DEPARTMENT • The February 2005 edition of CitySource,the City's newsletter to citizens and businesses, was included in the February 2nd issue of the Renton Reporter. This edition features detailed information about the upcoming State of the Community report; a special fitness pass available at the Renton Community Center; an art exhibit to honor Black History Month; a public comment opportunity on the Draft Watershed Habitat Plan; a summary of recent land use and zoning issues; Cinema on the Piazza sponsorship; January City Council Highlights; and a calendar of upcoming events. CitySource can also be found on the City's website, www.ci.renton.wa.us, through the Spotlight section under the press release option. • The latest edition of CityView is now airing on Renton Cable Channel 21. This edition of the City-produced video newsmagazine features: Renton Youth Symphony Auditions; Renton Municipal Court; Traffic Management Center; Volunteer Highlight-Renton Youth Council; STAR Play Grin and Bear It;Moment with the Mayor-Budget 2005; Citizen of the Year 2004; and Slice of History-WWI and WWII. CityView is aired on government access cable Channel 21 in Renton on Mondays at noon and 5:00 p.m.; Tuesdays and Thursdays at 6:00 a.m., 1:00 p.m., and 8:00 p.m.;Wednesdays and Fridays at 11:00 a.m., 2:00 p.m.,and 9:00 p.m.; and Saturdays and Sundays at 11:00 a.m. and 6:00 p.m. COMMUNITY SERVICES DEPARTMENT • The City of Renton Valley Hoop Shoot Contest is taking place this evening(Monday,February 7th)at the Renton Community Center. Children ages 14 and under are competing to represent the City of Renton at the All Cities Hoop Shoot held at Green River Community College in March, with the top two in each division advancing to the next competition. • In honor of Black History Month,the Renton Municipal Arts Commission will present an exhibit by local artist Angelena McQuarter. The exhibit will be on display through February 27th in the lobby of Carco Theatre. A free public Meet the Artist reception will be held on Saturday,February 12th, from 6:30 to 7:30 p.m., with refreshments provided. • Did you resolve to get fit this year? A Fitness Pass Special is being offered through March at the Renton Community Center. A monthly pass is just$19.95, or you can purchase a one-year pass for$200. Rates vary for Renton residents, students and seniors, and non-residents. For more information,call 425-430-6700. Administrative Report February 7,2005 Page 2 ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT,NEIGHBORHOODS, & STRATEGIC PLANNING DEPARTMENT • The third annual Neighbors Meeting Neighbors workshop, sponsored by the City of Renton Neighborhood Program, was held this past Saturday morning. The workshop provided neighborhood leadership training to 40 people,representing various neighborhood groups. 100% of those responding to an event survey felt the workshop was helpful to their neighborhoods and felt the Neighborhood Program helps them connect with the City and foster a more livable community. • As part of Renton's required 2004 Growth Management update,the City's draft Critical Areas Ordinance is now available for public review and comment either electronically on the City's website at www.ci.renton.wa.us or at the EDNSP Department on the 6th floor of City Hall.. The Planning Commission will review the draft ordinance in late February or early March. For additional information,please call 425- 430-6575. POLICE DEPARTMENT • The Renton Police Department's Citizen's Academy begins this week and will meet for 12 weeks on Tuesdays, from 7:00 to 9:00 p.m. The course will be presented to 31 participants. dorm 17/ 05 To: Toni Nelson, City of Renton I Re. Proposal for the rental of the house located at 1404 NE 30th,Renton WA 98056 I would like to propose renting the house located at the above address. I have lived next door at the Kennydale Apartments for the past two years. Putting a renter in this house would only benefit in helping the city pay the property taxes and derive income while waiting to make use of the land. I spoke with Denis Culp about the possibility of renting the house and walked through the house with Dennis Conte to evaluate the inside of the house. I realize that the property is slated for a Fire Station when funding becomes available and that it does not make sense to put a lot of money into the house because it will be torn down. I would like to propose renting the house for$600 a month with a 1-or 2-year lease agreement,month to month,thereafter,with a three-month notice from the city prior to the teardown of the house. I would ask the city make a few improvements,which can be done at a minimal expense to the city. • Put a water heater back into the house • Replace kitchen sink and cabinets(the cabinets that are in the basement could possibly be used),the kitchen currently has neither. • Replace front and back door handles and locks for safety I would also request that the city come to the property once a month and mow the property because of its size. I ask that the City of Renton agree to turn on the power in the house for the two months before I take residency and give me access to make the house livable at my expense. Here are a few of the repairs I will need to complete before moving into the property: • Find doors for the rooms • Put new sheet rock in the front room • Paint the inside of the house • Fix tom-up carpeted areas • Fix ceiling light fixtures • Purchase a range and refrigerator I would like to propose renting the home starting March or April of 2005, depending on how the work is coming along on the inside of the house. Thank you for considering my proposal. Roy Bala 1416 NE 30th#4 Renton WA 98056 206-235 8045 cell chevvydogg@msn.com CITY OF RENTON COUNCIL AGENDA BILL AI#: 3.b. SUBMITTING DATA: FOR AGENDA OF: February 7, 2005 Dept/Div/Board....Mayor's Office, AJLS Staff Contact Mayor Keolker-Wheeler AGENDA STATUS: Consent X SUBJECT: Public Hearing Reappointments to Civil Service Commission Correspondence... James Phelan Ordinance James Matthew Resolution Old Business EXHIBITS: New Business Study Session Other RECOMMENDED ACTION: APPROVALS: Council concur ( Legal Dept Finance Dept Other OFISCAL IMPACT: Expenditure RequiredTransfer/Amendment.... kiwi Amount Budgeted Revenue Generated SUMMARY OF ACTION: 0 Mayor Keolker-Wheeler reappoints the following to the Civil Service Commission: James Phelan for a six-year term, which expires on 12/31/2010. Mr. Phelan's address is: 2401 NE 24th, Renton, WA 98056; Phone: 425-255-0234. James Matthew for a six-year term, which expires on 12/31/2010. Mr. Matthew's address is: 223 Garden Ave N, Renton, WA 98055; Phone: 425-226-1114 The other members of the Commission are: William H. Larson, Randall Rockhill, and Richard C.Fisher. RECOMMENDATION: I i Confirm Mayor Keolker-Wheeler's reappointments of James Phelan and James Matthew to the Civil Service 1 Commission for six- year terms, which expire 12/31/2010. i CITY OF RENTON COUNCIL AGENDA BILL AI#: $' C . Submitting Data: For Agenda of: 02/07/05 Imf Dept/Div/Board.. Mayor's Office,AJLS Staff Contact Kathy Keolker-Wheeler Agenda Status Consent X Subject: Public Hearing.. Park Board Reappointment—Troy Wigestrand Correspondence.. Ordinance Resolution Old Business Exhibits: New Business None Study Sessions Information Recommended Action: Approvals: Council concur Legal Dept Finance Dept Other Fiscal Impact: Expenditure Required... Transfer/Amendment Amount Budgeted Revenue Generated Total Project Budget City Share Total Project SUMMARY OF ACTION: Mayor Keolker-Wheeler makes the following reappointment to the Park Board: Troy Wigestrand for a four-year term, which expires on June 1, 2008. Mr. Wigestrand's address is 2102 Queen Ave NE, Renton, WA 98056; Phone: 425-235-4122. The other members of the Board are: Cynthia Burns, Ralph Evans, Michael G. O'Donin, Ronald J. Regis, Timothy J. Searing, and Marjorie Richter. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Confirm Mayor Keolker-Wheeler's reappointment of Troy Wigestrand to the Park Board for a four-year II term, which expires June 1, 2008. Rentonnet/agnbill/ bh CITY OF RENTON COUNCIL AGENDA BILL AI#: ,d, Submitting Data: For Agenda of: kitit,,,r Dept/Div/Board.. Administrative,Judicial, and Legal February 7, 2005 Services Department Staff Contact Julie Brewer, Community Relations Agenda Status Manager(ext. 6522) Consent X Subject: Public Hearing.. Nishiwaki Lane, street name change Correspondence.. Ordinance Resolution Old Business Exhibits: New Business Issue Paper Study Sessions Map Information Resolution Recommended Action: Approvals: Council Concur Legal Dept Finance Dept Other I Fiscal Impact: Expenditure Transfer/Amendment Required... Amount Budgeted Revenue Generated Total Project Budget City Share Total Project SUMMARY OF ACTION: In June 2001,the Council approved renaming a section of Riverside Drive to Nishiwaki Lane. According to Code, legislation is required to formalize this name change. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: The Administration recommends that Council adopt a resolution to formalize the Nishiwaki Lane street name change. �Y ADMINISTRATIVE, JUDICIAL, AND LEGAL + " * SERVICES DEPARTMENT MEMORANDUM DATE: January 26, 2005 TO: Terri Briere, Council President Members of the Renton City Council VIA: Kathy Keolker-Wheeler, Mayor FROM: Derek Todd, Assistant to the Chief Administrative Officer STAFF CONTACT: Julie Brewer, Community Relations Manager(ext. 6522) SUBJECT: Resolution to formalize Nishiwaki Lane street name change ISSUE: 'iirorw In honor of our sister-city relationship with Nishiwaki, Japan, the Renton City Council approved renaming a section of Riverside Drive to Nishiwaki Lane on June 4, 2001. In reviewing the process for changing street names last September, it was found that there was no formal resolution adopted when the Council approved renaming a portion of Riverside Drive to Nishiwaki Lane. RECOMMENDATION: The Administration recommends that Council adopt a resolution to formalize the Nishiwaki Lane street name change according to code. a\poN 1 1 laylor llw„. . .Ave NW �N . • I s cn cn t�S aid Nord'e Ave SW Hardie Ave NW ■ — �o� (J.) . .. •and a �u wo2� . ._. .. . . _.. \N.... and J, Lake Ave S (.,.., , u.) ._ ,...4,, a o Shattuck Ave ° n tJ . _ cf) (: DAi2' `r' "' Whitworth Ave S a � ap�saa^'�� Morris A�e S • 2V- 1 l• c"-) z Smithers Ave S a, Logan Ave S Brnett Ave S et Ave S W�llioms "Ave S y upLogon Ave. N ry 01 `L Wells Ave S �^ a ..c,-, — Williams Ave. N l Mnin Ave S y // z Wells Ave. N a' S — \'' Pelly Ave N Pelly Ave. N � ti Cedar Ave S \ 6,)- E- PorkAve 0 Park Ave. N Park(...n o Renton Ave S ')s°o Garden Ave N " Ave. :z 3 Garden Ave. N co o Meadow Ave N• "' u-) Uapao l Z ac ory Ave N z \A a d co c<oo <„ °Us 7 \d a f°\1\ M as noN ___ Illici . 410111 .. Monterey Dr i Monterey CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON, RENAMING A PORTION OF RIVERSIDE DRIVE TO NISHIWAKI LANE IN HONOR OF RENTON'S SISTER CITY. WHEREAS,in 1969 the City of Renton established a Sister City relationship with Nishiwaki, Japan, in order to help promote mutual understanding and good will between the United States and Japan; and WHEREAS, the City has helped to maintained its relationship with Nishiwaki through the efforts of Renton's Nishiwaki Sister City Committee, and by periodic visits to Nishiwaki and Renton by delegations from either City; and WHEREAS,Renton has been enriched by the exchange of ideas and culture that has been provided by Nishiwaki; and WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Renton wishes to honor Nishiwaki for its long-standing Sister City relationship with the City of Renton; NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON, DO RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS: SECTION I. The above findings are true and correct in all respects. SECTION IL The section of Riverside Drive from the intersection of N. 6th Street and Logan Avenue North, continuing north along the Cedar River Trail to the Trail's end, shall hereafter be known as Nishiwaki Lane. fir✓ 1 RESOLUTION NO. PASSED BY THE CITY COUNCIL this day of , 2005. Bonnie I. Walton, City Clerk APPROVED BY THE MAYOR this day of , 2005. Kathy Keolker-Wheeler, Mayor Approved as to form: Lawrence J. Warren, City Attorney RES.1089:1/21/05 Noise 2 CITY OF RENTON COUNCIL AGENDA BILL AI#: $.e„ klitio :Submitting Data: For Agenda of 2/7/2005 Dept/Div/Board.. AJLS/City Clerk Staff Contact Bonnie Walton, x6502 Agenda Status Consent X Subject: Public Hearing... X Street Vacation Petition;portion of NE 4th Street, east of Correspondence.. Rosario Ave. NE; (Petitioner: City of Renton, File No. Ordinance VAC-04-006) Resolution X Old Business Exhibits: New Business Petition, legal and map Study Sessions Resolution setting public hearing Information Recommended Action: Approvals: Set public hearing date of 3/7/2005, and refer to Legal Dept X Planning/Building/Public Works Administrator for Finance Dept recommendations Other Fiscal Impact: Expenditure Required... N/A Transfer/Amendment Amount Budgeted Revenue Generated Total Project Budget City Share Total Project.. SUMMARY OF REQUEST: Niro On December 21, 2004, the City of Renton Transportation Division, submitted a petition and interfund transfer form in payment of the$250 application fee,requesting vacation of a 150-foot segment of NE 4th Street, 180-feet east of Rosario Ave. NE. The Planning/Building/Public Works Department has verified the petition documents and reports that more than two-thirds of the abutting property owners have signed the petition,representing 100%of the frontage. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Adopt a resolution to set a public hearing on 3/7/2005, and refer petition to the Planning/Building/Public Works Administrator for determination of advisability of the vacation and need for retention of easements. cc Karen McFarland Reference: 35.79 RCW&RMC 9-14 Sandra Meyer CITY OF RENTON PETITION FOR STREET VACATION IN THE CITY OF RENTON DEC 2 1 2004 shoe To the Honorable Mayor and Date 12/14/2004RECEIVED Members of the City Council CITY CLERK'S OFFICE City of Renton Circulated By: City of Renton Transportation 1055 S. Grady Way Renton, WA 98055 Address: Transportation Systems Div. Address: 1055 S Grady Way,Renton 98055 Dear Mayor and Council Members: Telephone: 425-430-7321 We,the undersigned property owners abutting a certain portion of public Right-of-Way, respectfully request the vacation of the street or alleyway as described on the attached "Exhibit A"and commonly known as: NE 4th Street (150' segment beginning approx. 180' east of Rosario Ave NE. (Insert closest cross streets and reference the street name,i.e.NE Bog Street from Bicycle Alley to Slalom Avenue NE.) We request a time and place be fixed when this petition will be heard by the City Council. Of the property owners abutting the area of this petition 100 % 12/3 or more required)of the lineal frontage have agreed and indicated their joining this petition with their signatures below: signature signature print name phone print name phone 6135 NE 4'"Street,Renton 98056 address address 1423059094 property identification number property identification number Instructions: 1. Insert name of street. (i.e. NE 4th, alleyway east of Sunset Blvd.) 2. Attach complete legal description(i.e. metes and bounds,etc.) 3. Have the applicable property owners provide the following: a) Sign name. (Signatures of owners of 2/3 of lineal frontage must sign. Spouses do not need to sign. Owners in common must sign.) b) Print name and phone number. c) List Property address and King County tax parcel identification number. 4. Attach a map to the petition designating the vacation boundaries. 5. Attach a brief statement of the purpose to be served by the street vacation. 6. Submit$250.00 filing fee with application. SUBMIT PETITION TO THE CITY CLERK, SEVENTH FLOOR, RENTON CITY HALL. NNW I:\Admin\Amberwood I1 Street Vacation Petition.doc\krw If and when the City Council approves the vacation at a public hearing, payment of a post- hearing processing fee of$250.00 will be required. *1104 signature signature print name phone print name phone address address property identification number property identification number signature signature print name phone print name phone address address property identification number property identification number signature signature print name phone print name phone address address property identification number property identification number I:\Admin\Amberwood II Street Vacation Petition.doc\krw Exhibit A Legal Description The Northerly 8 feet of the following described property: The West 150 feet of the East 1166.01 feet of the North 1/2 of the N.E. '/z of the N.W. '/z as measured along the North line of Section 14,Township 23 North,Range 5 East, W.M.,LESS the South 320.69 feet,and also LESS County Road,in the City of Renton,in King County,Washington. Situate in the Northwest Quarter of Section 14,Township 23 North,Range 5 East, W.M.,in the City of Renton, King County,Washington. `ern' I:\Admin\Amberwood 11 Street Vacation Petition.doc\krw Exhibit B Map Exhibit Amberwood 2/NE 4th Street Vacation w LI..cfT --+ IC)201 King County o, 'loon Proposed Vacation min\Amberwood II Street Vacation Petition.doc , " 9 '' c ", ./.(/''' , 't) • .''''f. 5 ,. s-,-. • - -, r 11.:,-..i',,,':•,.-1--!1‘,. „41.-;!-74171 Lri: ;/I'll -- . —, .,,.... , , , i 1 1- ,•/-'' '..., -' . . .., ., '' . f ',,,L._ l'`. / I,4,, ?,, C",,, 1 .,I 10.,,e . 1 \„, . • . 1 . t t j ij r--, • „:, . „ , ,, -,---1 i t if 4.r.,,......._,T...r„‘ , ..... . ...... „ .., ,, ., ,-,,, . ......... , ,... --ii, P I ,f ' • 1 I aLt...; ,,,,,,,, . ^ '• ' A 1 '.•"•' ..1-•,a) ....! I 5-r I --.5545 7."-'.....,5” i A .,55..... /7:'"'",,•-`,. • t',...t ...t:' ..,'' I I'..,':' )I II .4 , ,• I .A,•'•"',': • 77 LIL*---...`''''', -' . --• ,.......--!a- ‘1 • I i=•a•''. ', • 4 ' 1 ''''N,-,.•,--,„ 1,4`',"....3-xl;.‘. ' • ',..\, -?'-'''''.'.",'"' 1:,. I ? /I.'. ';•'•4..4 1 5 • ?".,755..,5 5='-..414•55,;55;:,..,.,.1'; ... 5r.4— -i14.4.::+55 4,4554ri " ,.-` -,51. ,...U" •... . .., „I , i, 5.-,453 /I -34":-:; •5 • • l',7 t ,.....;"'4 vi „•,.....11,1, ipw•-.,.. F-_..f,-.7,01,,,,m,:.,., ...'•' •,-Iiipar., - ...,,:T. '''''••••-•----:kib,,,,,,%1 " :.,,:ty'•,1,•::;(1*.i:s.e''''' ,i,•:!;',,,, Fr. -, 1 ....,-.4 4v9.4x.„,„,4j ,i,„ ---,rr j„ ,41, A3 4? ? f.,,-,,? 1 •., 4 t• , , ,.,,,,, .,,,,410,Y.1„44.-- ,,,,,...--,•,,,,•,,:7,,,,,-?.,,.., i 4, "-i;fril'i"7".;;* '-') t.., ;::"' '71':‘A \I i t • ?...,5. v3..,c- '-,;3-,----., ,,..3ct.' ......., , , ‘?.„ ,.• t - r t , , ,,, ,,, _... i:4i"!LI. ‘il r-4 ,..21,...- 4,,i,„4 1, ''— ..—.1-1.,14-;-%-.4 ',,--, -.? .,1 ..;....*, , 4 ,4, ,,,i f -"...i An',7 • .', - ' /r.'040.I.i...'4.14,W----.- ..4 ..X, Cup,./ t• ), .."'".1 . ',".4f.'" l''''',74., • , ,,„,, 't',....A E,,,.....:.,r I a ,..t:.:•!,t ''"..,.'i,i,:1,:a.,, L _ . 4.75,54 c051.,5.--5. .„, , ‘,!,5. , 55., .., . 3.. ., " g..e", ...k. 0 ''. fE40A.4) , ';', f::' .''4!, ....T4. 6 , 1 9.!,j ' '411 ..,.. , ., ixi.:,;• 515555., sa. f O ',0,:;;fr' ft '<4'-'7:7-4, f'' ' f. ,.1,..• • ... ;4 - ‘, 3,•....???? kl.,,,,,/,1.U •s, -1-....-.7 a '''''''AZ.-.'•''''.,,• iC>iv....,Th- ,''/ \ i", --"--r'''''''''—'' ... -I.., ,..,,,,. ..s. s,!... ''...,15 .. .....t r;5,55$55-555 .. /, I 4 I,"r -L.I t• 104 •- 'r^" --;..•,,,,,,,•••-4 . .1„p-Ir. „,„,,,',,,i•••••".r.-...,,,' ••,.: , % '••J ...: ' 'As.- • ' f.' . ''I ,,,,v.- ", .*4.1.....:!.:', .:;..r.-a-.1 17..„....... , •••-!.. 1 \ I' . .,,r:!..`-: • .) % ,,,,,I.., t . .- ..-, a„...,.n -.:••••,...:‘:•-,,,1 •,,,w, •:.... --: , t,. I • • ...-..4. , -:,,,,,-,„.' •,,, ;-----i-•...... -:-., ,.„ :r1 .477°7, 'w"-", z'-',". .• .. 3?..,.-: 1-...,, 1,31• a'-s -••...a;•••''''''''• w.a•• at ,, - 'PS, Ii4' -, k"t'.).,A.''"'":1, ,.,_5,, ,..„7/,,,5 ks ti / , A• ..' ,,,,, , „;'. ..,..' -:,;tai ,.'"j .."7'77.•*. i a••t-,-....., 1 5-5-55. .. 4',.5-5-555,-a , I ,, ,,,, ,,,,,,,.,", ,. , ,if i l'.34, '"'• ' . `,.- '''- '''' '1, •, ' - .,,, ' -' : --- ,' -.I. ..17? -;,t,,,-•,-,," , `,'' 1, -' ' ' •. ,, -,-'... ?, • ,.,,;, '-- • i • .• , -?-...3'.....,"4 --*-3'?,4.7;,:' '''!,,•I' .11. 1 A r,"' ......' • ',„ , '"• ,',‘',t,,*•vr' , ,' r • . ••`• , -•••1••, , . I...., i ,. 4 p...._ s, s 1 A , "..--".'' - ...f. y `‘" 77,--1 - 1 -;?4,4721,7 ,"-c i .414• 1 ,,,,,,, , 1.0:,1H.17::::, , le . , •,„ . .,, •,-...''."....^ -...• %.„, ',,,VIdi''. 14, t', ' S, . '-*1 7Fr 1 "'-' ;" ' "5 . ' ;555--I- . •? ''..9,-.7-; *, j'a••,,....,/ i ‘4%;,,,,,: •s. •te,'4-4.'--- EIV"P"19114:106Am: 11.4e,N '.''',•''- :'' '"- ,, - •• '-ti--- , - : -`' ,• f1,511101,011IN:111N, t ' - kj444'*.,,,,,,,.. 4111-laazonweasaareee4W.0,, - •--- ' l'a - s. .., . . ..,t,, 'r."1" --11414'-'": 1 , `' ....47. ..?.., ::::1,11.11:401:10411401:::!!'„: . •, i! ' y' f, 7: 77 ki ,,,„ ?., 3, ,.,,,-..'-•*, .r"7*--..!. , _.4,,,_.....31114k ''' ..7 T 'F''' 4/ ,-e"-- ,, / 4., lt,i,i;;IN 4.0.,4'•11.1:14 0 0044,- ''''' ll• .411.1•PiiaVii * ,*;::::7,4; ,0,1wit:;:1•:'.:, - :474::•'1:,„,'' '11:...•-'...*F.. .‘'' Itak•A'N' t'- -,:t41--z'•:" • v7-"ir•-M-- c 1114:01:011011,41$101410110.M41$.0A$ ": .•%'7i'''.4!-.'!--1: / ' ""'"ell'il.`10:1? - o 1;104,47,:0:41#144;ittsOtt:A444,W;i1,1•410:0,?:,‘,' ; .-•;::-;';'4,44!1,P!---/%?::0:i.:ilii'Areli4iiii.40:1*'?,N 7.7-- ?,,,Nestiti:1 :114,„11;v.,4,4 1.!•,-,.,;,.3/3 '4:1*1.11',1:1:0;:t44:t,11:;1?1!:?:? ,. ..../.5 - „.....,... 5 545:4510,10:5,4144,1;10:41:14:10,4:4;,,,„, '5:554:i15,45145,1:4441p4N14:5:1:55:44$1114:14,,55,.5.4k4614iII,VVr5litliiii1511,15,11V:445:405% ' ' ..,/--tiw''• - - ii 5 5 , 0,,, ;5 i 4 kr .e.' ??.Al.1.,, > '1.7''' '''", "'Itili;ltr:,i,igagiiil!Ift55,14,4:141,iilliii:0101,T5it.i.:ithi*I:i*i05114111111:,,,:iMigne;,K5 ....,,,..,-..-____...- - •-• IS ! 55 .-.. .5..-k .5 '. ....;L:4.5'41.55 " )-5-55 ..,.....,,,,,,, 45,1450,:ylto:55::54:55.1:50:5,5;:k455:5,:q5.4515A1:5404 • 5,:-.55:5-.-...5--- i A -' . - .Q .. • -- ,. . i....,/,... . ...-z-....--, .t ). 74 1 4' i4.„.-44,1,-- "---•i ‘1%P.7 i• a , -'',.0,1011:::::::::110,1;:i401:e4,1;tiS1441M0[4:i*i*tailiril$1411:1:1.0:f•kttl";.• -•••-• ,,,,,,,, '' .‘„ ",141)1*,ill:lq:NI:tlinhilIiti:14`A:11.1141:1:iq'llill:: :::*4114hilititi44110:iiirV'i ' ,,, ,,,, ',.. . 4. ', t . \`'••••••;,'''Af 3 • ' '4110;::::::11.:IgNi'014111:11:4&41• 1:1,:11::elhi11104:1:101:14114.1:f:1;;: = N \ I'1'.•'..,0,41i4::,,ils'AbireAlr.g:::11:::I.::::::;:;::::1;44N:0,11::.1,1;tAI:',1:14if,i)::;;;V--‘-,,.a„.;.:Aat'a)....'',"' ,•i••••.4,,. '4,: ..?' ,,, ' ,4 )e •si,.... ' .;.;.,,, ,r•-•"-Lk ,•, '"•Il''s:lill•Iliii**:%;4:iii:1,11,:!*.‘,:i1,4f:ti*RilirtiVAi:iii;i*.iilli:hi*i',Wii:iii*i:IV7,1 .''''•"-: "' ' 1''. NI '.." ''• "' ' • ^ .c: F .i,..,:141,4%*$:W;;;:;:,..:,•:tAti:i. :;:;i:%::.*14,11,141.:;04;;,teiq:i14,,..1" .1111- ' ... ::,..,s,,, ,,',. It' v/..., ''s ; "-'';. •1/2 ",;*???4.40:4:.::?:?;1;:yloo"; ;,??1,..4:,:???4,0,41m,,,o;;;;?:44,1:,,;-,;,- , • ,.. •. ,or", • ,4,T ,k-,.,t:.k v , ,,, ,, • ' t , 0 L :Li • ' Z ‘. r4'1,111.'::14,..q.414414:rli ili:i:.:':':::::1.1'..*E`Illq+NOV`''''•''i t • 4 ' L.. \''..... , :.1.4.:0.,:::q.14:114::011.h:,.,1* .1.:q,:qq,:q.'::ti.'f.'4'414.14 . ''''• ' '•-•'.•- -. "..' ?1:'• '''" ' '4''''''''' I . ' - ''''' - '''tr'''''"' 44'..'1,, • 3? .7/ --,. .?. :- • .•V+: . 4.? .c• , 440414.4it,ty,,,i r.4:t WrO{ 1.01`,YetWt Al-01 01'1', I 1:...' 'Ill d;L.'..'• ..''''''' ' . ' 4 ,• ky.?.??0,,,,,q?.??,44??.., ?.?,IIN. 0???-?,1????•??:+;??.?;?;•144;,,,,.. ',,... .......... ,,,, .,,,??,;:::,,NA:11:1???;::;????;?; ,?:•:?;?:???????!.101,flor:?...0-3...7-3 ''' 71 4.•V i hiiii it 3., 4/14.-, --.!i -'.....a.' ''..-/ i'Veill.:44'0:0:140:01.:1,0R,a. i::;114a:P:4141110'17 41.^,g. , , - ,4; ' "ii '4 ' *47 W ' i I . j .!. -,Miii0:11:01'4011?:?;i,,4;P:;:ni' - / - ,..'111 - 4",,.•-• , sep,tooroitne.,1/4,1 '1.0.'1'0000.,' ' -ad. „• -...,41,' '. --- ,. ,,,,,', .. .o. •,..„„, —.....•,......,..., E 1-1,;'•"-.7.1-1-"„;? ;•,*:1014,iiLt;:1,,v1::1:k4,1: 1134Igiii:i:ili?!*:11;1“4..., 1 , .7 -„at.. ..-10041. 55c5 1.., '5. .4:5,41.4.5515,:5:;10:41:1;1;b1.41;15W1;5505.55515:5,:g1r5;5.,$k.o.5.fr55 -•"kw 011=1""1"'"'"," . i ."' i :1::1:41::•:•, 1°`":'N. , -'' ,t.!1:11a114n4: i ::113M:NOt ;114;,,t`r .7 A -.-- -777-: -'.,' -3 .1 - ' - .554e 52"''— ) ) ) • CITY OF RENTON Exhibit D Statement of Purpose DEC 2 1 2004 CITY OF RENTON RECEIVED PLANNING/BUILDING/PUBLIC WORKS CITY CLERK'S OFFICE MEMORANDUM DATE: December 14, 2004 TO: City Clerk FROM: Transportation Syst5101517Xion SUBJECT: Statement of Purpose Amberwood Phase II-Street Vacation Petition and Filing Fee This memo details the purpose and public benefit of the proposed vacation of a portion of the NE 4th Street public right-of-way and addresses the filing fee: The existing right-of-way on NE 4th Street / SE 128th Street is generally 84' symmetrical on the centerline. Approximately 203' east of Rosario Ave NE on the southside of NE 4th Street, there begins a 150' section of NE 4th Street where the existing right-of-way on the southside is 50', 8' wider than the typical NE 4th Street cross-section. This 8' x 150' portion(1200 sf)of NE 4th Street public right-of-way is proposed to be vacated. In its current location,this extra 8' of public right-of-way is of little use to the transportation system. In exchange for the proposed vacation, an equal right-of-way swap is proposed. A right-of-way dedication of(1200 sf) is proposed along NE 4th Street in the SE corner of the NE 4th Street / Rosario Ave NE intersection. This right-of-way dedication will allow for the future addition of a farside bus-pullout. The NE 3`a-4th Street Corridor Improvements study, currently in draft form by the Transportation Division, proposes farside bus-pullouts along this corridor and a future traffic signal for the NE 4th Street/Rosario Ave NE intersection. The proposed vacation/right-of-way swap is in the public interest by increasing the usable right- of-way at the NE 4th Street / Rosario Ave NE intersection for future intersection improvements. The proposed bus-pullout would improve traffic flow and transit amenities. The proposed bus- pullout and traffic signal would most likely be part of a single future intersection improvement project. Filing Fee The filing fee for this street vacation petition will be paid by a City of Renton inter-department funds transfer as detailed on the attached Interfund Transfer. cc: n/a I:Wdmin\Amberwood II Street Vacation Petition.doc Exhibit E , 1 • ,401100 ► Meeting Type: City of Renton/Bales LTD PS Coordination ► Meeting Date: December I, 2004 ► Meeting Place: Renton City Hall,Room 511 ► Time: 9:15-10:OOAM ► Attendees: /f,t7 heed, Steve Beck,Amberwood 2 LLC Signature: • �• • dew 11 j la Juliana Fries,Dev.Services Signature: 1177S7r • - —1 —o Keith Woolley,Transportation Signature: Notes Actions By Date The attendees met to discuss the possibility of a"land-swap". An 8'x150' portion of NE 4th Street right-of-way would be vacated to the Amberwood 2 plat in exchange for an equal portion of right-of-way to be dedicated along NE 4°i Street at the SE corner of the NE 4th Street / Rosario Ave NE intersection. This right-of-way dedication would be part of the Amberwood 2 plat and tract 999 of the Amberwood I plat. The right-of-way dedication would be approximately 8-11' wide with a small radius around the SE curb return at the intersection. The right-of-way dedication is in anticipation of a future long-range project to signalize the NE 4" Street/Rosario Ave NE intersection and add an eastbound far-side bus pull-out. The proposed"land-swap"would only be transfer of property. There are no physical improvements proposed at this time. The Amberwood 2 development presents the opportunity today for the City to establish right- of-way lines at the NE 4th Street/Rosario Ave NE intersection for future intersection improvements. Steve Beck,representing the Amberwood 2 development,was supportive of Transportation 12/14/04 the concept. However,the Amberwood 2 LLC does not want to incur the Div to prepare costs associated with the "land-swap". Therefore, the City of Renton Petition for Transportation Division proposes to fund the associated fees with the Street Vacation proposed street vacation($250 filing fee,$250 processing fee,appraisal). •for signatures. The City Council will be asked to waive the appraisal since it will be an Petition to be equal"land-swap"with benefit to the City. prepared prior to Hearing Payment for the street vacation (compensation to be received by the City) Examiner will be the equal land dedication from Amberwood 2 and Amberwood 1 meeting on tract 999. Dec. 14th Amberwood 2 LLC will not request any reimbursement from the City to fund any revisions to the development plans. ► Prepared by: Keith R.Woollev Date: December 9.2004. 4411.0 I:\Admin\Amberwood 11 Street Vacation Petition.doc Renton v.„.... � "` € i m } r1 . ,, ++�teras. x --- Renton City Limits4. .7,' ,.. . .,... ....,....„:,.....„,.•,......".•<7!..,�� . ' , � , i 7 a t• �F ': + ^- 35:1r �1 �. ✓ ° nom' n Parcels r ;; � � f�� 4. �£.� alb a rr- tE "�'' Z` 1JiL. �s�'r-.. t i ' • - .. �n r ' ,AE;e.., .tib t .t„ 7`$;: s , g Y , S � �4 $ .n' •S 5 ?'Sf kG3 ,.y xrz.�Yp d,, . i : &r� • .4.47.,,:;,-.:,! -...„: -:,,-. . - - ... - 7=:; :- • ,:;•:,:.: ''.'• -1t;.; ,,,,.....i*iii0,,,,:e4:4:e*i.-:1;:fgi,;1:iit4tiliCkTIV t•::.;,,,,''". > 3 lifinie '- E,. C. �� € 3 F3 So x � 1 illi r B. N SCALE 1 : 1,369 — —' Mil NII 100 0 100 200 300 FEET Nine http://rentonnet.org/MapGuide/maps/Parcel.mwf Tuesday, January 25, 2005 6:12 PM 142305-9068 BALES LIMITED PARTNERSHIP P.O. BOX 3015 RENTON, WA 98056 142305-9070 RANDALL D and ROSEMARY M LEIFER 5127 S FOUNTAIN ST SEATTLE, WA 98178 CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON lose RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF IHE CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON, SETTING A HEARING DATE TO VACATE A PORTION OF NE 4th STREET, EAST OF ROSARIO AVENUE NE (CITY OF RENTON; VAC- 04-006). WHEREAS, a Petition has been filed with the City Clerk of the City of Renton on or about December 21, 2004, pursuant to the requirements of RCW 35.79, petitioning for the vacation of a portion of NE 4th Street, as hereinafter more particularly described, and said petition having been signed by the owners of more than two-thirds (2/3) of the property abutting upon said alley sought to be vacated, and same being described as follows: See Exhibit"A" attached hereto and made a part hereof as if fully set forth herein (A portion of NE 4th Street, beginning approximately 180 feet east of Rosario Avenue NE). *BF NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON, DO RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS: SECTION I. That the 7th day of March, 2005, at the hour of 7:30 P.M. at the City Council Chambers at City Hall, Renton, King County, Washington, be and is hereby fixed as the time and place for a public hearing to consider the aforesaid Petition for vacating a portion of NE 4th Street, beginning approximately 180 feet east of Rosario Avenue NE, which said hearing date is not more than sixty nor less than twenty days from the date of passage of this Resolution. SECTION IL The City Clerk is hereby authorized and directed to give notice of said time and date of the hearing as provided in RCW 35.79.020 and any and/or all persons interested therein or objecting to said vacation may then appear and be heard thereon, or they may 1 RESOLUTION NO. file their written objections thereto with the City Clerk at or prior to the time of hearing on said Ned vacation. SECTION ILL The City Council shall determine, as provided in RCW 35.79.030, as to whether an appraisal shall be secured to determine the fair market value of the property sought to be vacated as provided for in Ordinance No. 4266, and the amount of compensation to be paid by the Petitioner-Owners to the City for such vacation. The City likewise reserves the right to retain an easement for public utility and related purposes. PASSED BY THE CITY COUNCIL this day of , 2005. Bonnie I. Walton, City Clerk APPROVED BY THE MAYOR this day of , 2005. Kathy Keolker-Wheeler, Mayor Approved as to form: Lawrence J. Warren, City Attorney RES.1092:01/31/05 i 2 Exhibit A Legal Description The Northerly 8 feet of the following described property: The West 150 feet of the East 1166.01 feet of the North'/of the N.E. '/of the N.W. 1/2 as measured along the North line of Section 14,Township 23 North,Range 5 East,W.M.,LESS the South 320.69 feet,and also LESS County Road,in the City of Renton,in King County,Washington. Situate in the Northwest Quarter of Section 14,Township 23 North,Range 5 East,W.M.,in the City of Renton, King County,Washington. 'err► I:1Admin\Amberwood I1 Street Vacation Petition.doc\krw Exhibit B Map Exhibit Amberwood 2/NE 4th Street Vacation z J , \\\,.............. wi .., 1 . cy g 0 ,..... . A 4. :, & i 11 E ..0) E N iC)2D0:1 King County 0 loon Proposed Vacation 1minVimberwood II Street Vacation Petition.doc (- (tiu , CITY OF RENTON COUNCIL AGENDA BILL AI#: Submitting Data: For Agenda of: Li Dept/Div/Board. Community Services/Parks February 7, 2005 Division Staff Contact... Bill Rasmussen (ext. 6617) Agenda Status Consent X Subject: Public Hearing.. Sunset Court Park Play Equipment Purchase and Correspondence.. Installation Project, CAG-04-145 Ordinance Resolution Old Business Exhibits: New Business Notice of Completion of Public Works Contract Study Sessions Copy of Final Pay Estimate Information Copy of Application and Certificate for Payment Recommended Action: Approvals: Council Concur Legal Dept. Finance Dept. X Other Fiscal Impact: Expenditure Required $69,787.58 Transfer/Amendment lituoi Amount Budgeted $80,000.00 Revenue Generated Total Project Budget $80,000.00 City Share Total Project.. SUMMARY OF ACTION: The purchase and installation of play equipment and safety surfacing material at Sunset Court Park has been completed in accordance with contract documents. The project had no change orders. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Council accepts the project, authorizes final payment of$66,580.43 to Landscape Structures, Inc., and releases the retainage amount of$3,207.15 upon receipt of all required liens and releases. 2005-020aa State of Washington Department of Revenue �� PO Box 47474 REVENUE Olympia WA 98504-7474 Contractor's Registration No. (UBI No.) Date NOTICE OF COMPLETION OF PUBLIC WORKS CONTRACT From: .. e �y +'', a \'''1,t i s E 1 Se .' , � � , _ .,.. w. Assigned ToCity of Renton Tracy Schuld 1055 S. Grady Way Renton, WA 98055 Date Assigned Notice is hereby given relative to the completion of contract or project described below Description of Contract Contract Number Purchase/installation of play equipment at Sunset Court Park CAG-04-145 Contractor's Name Telephone Number Landscape Structures,Inc. 1-800-328-0035 Contractor's Address P.O. Box 198, 601 7th Street South,Delano,MN 55328 Date Work Commenced Date Work Completed Date Work Accepted 11/5/04 1/13/05 1/13/05 Surety or Bonding Company Construction Bonding and Management Services of Washington, Inc. 'nes Address tric hard Fix, P.O. Box 75715, Seattle, WA 98125 Contract Amount $ 64,143.00 Additions $ + 0.00 Liquidated Damages $ 0.00 Reductions $ — 0.00 Sub-Total $ 64,143.00 Amount Disbursed $ 66,580.43 Amount of Sales Tax Paid at 8.8% $ 5,644.58 Amount Retained $ 3,207.15 (If various rates apply,please send a breakdown.) TOTAL $ 69,787.58 TOTAL $ 69,787.58 Comments: Signature Type or Print Name Tracy Schuld Phone Number 425-430-6918 The Disbursing Officer must complete and mail THREE copies of this notice to the Department of Revenue, PO Box 47474,Olympia, WA 98504-7474, immediately after acceptance of the work done under this contract.NO ' 'YMENT SHALL BE MADE FROM RETAINED FUNDS until receipt of Department's certificate, and then only in rdance with said certificate. To inquire about the availability of this document in an alternate format for the visually impaired,please call(360)753-3217. Teletype (TTY)users please call(800)451-7985. You may also access tax information on our Internet home page at http://dor.wa.gov. REV 31 0020e(6-27-01) DATE: 2/7/05 TO: Tracy Schuld FROM: Bill Rasmussen 4:7C0 CONTRACTOR: Landscape Structures, Inc. VS PROJECT NAME: Sunset Court Park Play Equipment Purchase & Installation CONTRACT NO.: CAG-04-145 (FINAL) ESTIMATE NO. 1 1. CONTRACTOR EARNINGS THIS ESTIMATE $64,143.00 2. SALES TAX @ 8.8% $5,644.58 3. TOTAL CONTRACT AMOUNT THIS ESTIMATE $69,787.58 4. EARNINGS PREVIOUSLY PAID CONTRACTOR $0.00 5. * EARNINGS DUE CONTRACTOR THIS ESTIMATE $60,935.85 6. SUBTOTAL - CONTRACTOR PAYMENT $60,935.85 7. RETAINAGE ON PREVIOUS EARNINGS $0.00 8. ** RETAINAGE ON EARNINGS THIS ESTIMATE $3,207.15 9. SUBTOTAL - RETAINAGE $3,207.15 10. SALES TAX PREVIOUSLY PAID $0.00 11. SALES TAX DUE THIS ESTIMATE $5,644.58 12. SUBTOTAL $5,644.5? *00 * (95% x Line 1) ** (RETAINAGE @ 5%) GRAND TOTAL $69,787.58 FINANCE DEPARTMENT ACTION PAYMENT TO CONTRACTOR (LINES 5 AND 11) No. 1 $66,580.43 Account 316.000000.020.5940.0076.63.000001 RETAINED AMOUNT (LINE 8) No. 1 $3,207.15 Account 316.000000.020.5940.0076.63.000001 TOTAL THIS ESTIMATE: $69,787.58 CHARTER 116, LAWS OF 1965 I,THE UNDERSIGNED DO HEREBY CERTIFY UNDER PENALTY OF PERJURY,THAT THE MATERIALS HAVE BEEN FURNISHED,THE SERVICES RENDERED OR THE LABOR PERFORMED AS DESCRIBED HEREIN, AND THAT THE CLAIM IS A JUST,DUE AND UNPAID OBLIGATION AGAINST THE CITY OF RENTON,AND THAT I AM AUTHORIZED TO AUTHENTICATE AND CERTIFY TO SAID CLAIM. SIGNED: 0 '1n►'„'/1 c,`, 2005-021 as APP JCATION AND CERTIFICATE FOR P YMENT 'tv of Renton TO OW/k...,: PROJECT: APPLICATION NO. : 1 Distrib .to : City of Renton Sunset Court Park — OWNER 1055 S. Grady Way Purchase&Installation PERIOD TO : 1/13/2005 "'i ARCHITECT Renton,WA 98055 of Play Equipment CONTRACTOR PROJECT NO. : CAG-04-145 FROM CONTRACTOR: VIA ARCHITECT: Landscape Structures, Inc. P.O. Box 198, 601 Seventh St. S Delano,MN 55328 CONTRACTOR'S APPLICATION FOR PAYMENT CHANGE ORDER SUMMARY ADDITIONS DEDUCTIONS Application is made for payment,as shown below, in connection with the Contract. Change Orders approved in P YPP Continuation Sheet is attached. previous months by owner $ - $ - 1. ORIGINAL CONTRACT SUM(with tax) $ 69,787.58 C.O.'s approved this month Number Date Approved 2. Net change by Change Orders(with tax) $ - 3. CONTRACT SUM TO DATE(with tax) $ 69,787.58 (Line 1 +or-Line 2) TOTALS(with tax) $ - 4. TOTAL COMPLETED&STORED TO DATE(with tax).. $ 69,787.58 * Net changes by Change Orders 5. (Washington State Sales Tax at 8.8%) $ 5,644.58 The undersigned Contractor certifies that to the best of the Contractor's knowledge, infor- (Based on line 4) mation and belief the Work covered by this Application for Payment has been completed 6. Revised Total Completed&Stored to Date(w/o tax) $ 64,143.00 in accordance with the Contract Documents,that all amounts have been paid by the (Line 4 less Line 5) Contractor for Work for which previous Certificates for Payment were issued and payment 7. RETAINAGE AT 5% $ 3,207.15 received I the Owner,and that current payment shown herein is now due. (Based on Line 6 Only) 8. TOTAL EARNED LESS RETAINAGE $ 66,580.43 CO RA C / (Line 4 less Line 7) By: 6 W 1, Date: /2��zco> 9. LESS PREVIOUS CERTIFICATES FOR PAYMENT $ - (Line 8 from prior Certificate) State of: Washington, County of: King 10. CURRENT PAYMENT DUE $ 66,580.43 Subscribed and sworn to before me this day of ,19__ 11. BALANCE TO FINISH,INCLUDING RETAINAGE $ 3,207.15 Notary Public : (Line 3 less Lines 9 and 10) My Commission expires : ARCHITECT'S CERTIFICATE FOR PAYMENT AMOUNT CERTIFIED (Attach explanation if amount certified differs from amount applied for) In accordance with the Contract Documents,based on on-site observations and the ARCHITECT : data comprising the above application,the Architect certifies to the Owner that to By: Date: the best of the Architect's knowledge,information and belief the Work has progressed as indicated,the quality of the Work is in accordance with the Contract This Certificate is not negotiable. The AMOUNT CERTIFIED is payable only Documents, and the Contractor is entitled to payment of the AMOUNT CERTIFIED. to the Contractor named herein. Issuance,payment and acceptance of payment are without prejudice to any rights of the Owner or Contractor under this Contract. CONTINUATION SHEET • AIA DOCUMENT 6703 PAGE OF PAGES ALA Document G702,APPLICATION AND CERTIFICATION FOR PAYMENT,containing APPLICATION NO: Contractor's signed certification is attached. APPLICATION DATE: In tabulations below, amounts are stated to the nearest dollar. PERIOD TO: Use Column I on Contracts where variable retainage for line items may apply. ARCHITECT'S PROJECT'NO: A B C D E F G H I ITEM DESCRIPTION OF WORK SCHEDULk L) WORK COMPLETED MATERIALS —�IOIAL % ., BALANCE RETAINAGE N0. VALUE FROM PREVIOUS THIS PERIOD PRESENTLY COMPLETED (G+C) TO FINISH I®% APPLICATION STORED AND STORED (C-G) 6(94 (D+E) (NOT IN TO DATE • D OR E) (D+E+F) i) 6kn6e+(owf- Pod( 0;17151— Ci 6 ,7E-7,5i' Y.. ik1787, r 10o% O. '5,11713r Plig L441,fiwie4f- s , • - ' s - s 6 -113-), s - s / 17 • IUv0', $ 6 - s34( (..., . L 1 . AIA DOCUMENT G703•CONTINUATION SHEET FOR G702•1992 EDITION•AIA•01992 THE AMERICAN INSTITUTE OF ARCHITECTS,1735 NEW YORK AVENUE,N.W.WASHINGTON,D.C, 20006.5232 G703-1992 !- IANDSCAPE Invoice L95942 5942 w STRUGIURES INC estrisminamED Bill To: 51045 Customer Sales Invoice Page City of Renton Order Order Date 1055 South Grady Way Renton 409-0015B 12-14-04 1 Renton, WA 98055 USA Invoice Nbr. L95942 Ship To: 51045 Dealer 176 PlayCreation, Inc. City of Renton Ship Date 12/14/04 1055 South Grady Way Ship Via Renton Freight Terms Renton, WA 98055 Payment Terms Net 30 days USA Project Name -tat; - .. ::-.:':: :.-:•.......:.. Sell :,:>.:•.. y.. .. •:-.- :; _ ... :;;:eq:<>.;> .;.., . shipped; .... E3riil :. ; : ; :::.>::::::EXteiided:. No`s,. Number UM _ Qty; ' Price Price- 1 1250-99-00-00 EA 1 1 19782 . 00 19, 782 . 00 Custom Playbooster 2 1250-99-00-00 EA 1 1 825 . 00 825 . 00 Single Post Swings 1250-99-00-00 EA 1 1 18290 . 00 18 , 290 . 00 Now Custom Playbooster 4 1250-99-00-00 EA 1 1 1021 . 00 1, 021 . 00 Single Post Swing 5 1250-99-00-00 EA 1 1 7500 . 00 7, 500 . 00 Woodcarpet Surfacing 6 1250-99-00-00 EA 1 1 13725 . 00 13 , 725 . 00 Installation 7 1250-99-00-00 EA 1 1 3000 . 00 3 , 000 . 00 Freight 8 1250-99-00-00 EA 1 1 5644 . 58 5, 644 . 58 Sales Tax *** SUB-TOTAL *** 69, 787 . 58 To ensure proper credit, please REMIT inclpde invoice number L95942 69, 787 . 58 IF POSTMARKED BY 01/13/05 on your remittance and forward to: LANDSCAPE STRUCTURES INC. SDS i2-0395 PO BOX 86 MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55486-0395 INVOICE AMOUNT 69, 787 . 58 ''fir Your Account Representative is : 1. 50% Finance Charge per Month Imposed Rob Kowalke - 1-888-769-5636 After 30 days of Invoice Date 601 7th Street South P.O. Box 198 Delano, MN 55328-0198 763.972.3391 1-888-4FUNLSI Fax:763-972-3185 www.playlsi.com l CITY OF RENTON COUNCIL AGENDA BILL IAl#: 2.3. I Submitting Data: Community Services For Agenda of: February 7, 2005 Dept/Div/Board.. Community Services/Facilities/Municipal Arts Commission Staff Contact Peter Renner(X6605) Agenda Status Consent X Subject: Public Hearing.. Approval of 1 %for Arts Project for the Renton Municipal Correspondence.. Parking Garage Ordinance Resolution Old Business Exhibits: New Business Issue Paper Study Sessions Contract Information Exhibits Recommended Action: Approvals: Refer to Community Services Committee Legal Dept....x Finance Dept..x.... Other Fiscal Impact: lifivi Expenditure Required... $52,774.11 Transfer/Amendment Amount Budgeted $52,000.00 Revenue Generated Total Project Budget $52,774.11 City Share Total Project SUMMARY OF ACTION: The Facilities Division of the Community Services Department requests Council's approval of a contract with Richard C. Elliott to create,provide, and supervise installation of his proposed art work for the Renton Municipal Parking Garage. The Facilities Division also requests Council's approval of the total project budget. Funding for the total project budget is available from Fund 125. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Council authorize the Mayor and City Clerk to sign the proposed contract with Richard C. Elliott and approve the total project budget. Ittiol Rentonnet/agnbill/ bh MEMORANDUM a, 4L CITY OF RENTON COMMUNITY SERVICES 0 Committed to Enriching Lives 0 TO: Terri Briere, Council President Members of the Renton City Council VIA: .3(/JKathy Keolker-Wheeler, Mayor FROM: Dennis Culp, Community Services Administrator STAFF CONTACT: Peter Renner, x6605 SUBJECT: Art Project for Municipal Parking Garage DATE: January 24, 2005 Issue: Should the Council authorize the Mayor and the City Clerk to sign a contract with Richard C. Elliott, artist, to create,provide, and supervise installation of a significant piece of art for the Renton Municipal Parking Garage and authorize the total project budget? Recommendation: Council authorize the Mayor and City Clerk to sign the contract with Richard C. Elliott. and authorize the total project budget. Background: • The City of Renton funds art for its municipal building projects through a 1%for Art Program. • The Renton Municipal Parking Garage thereby generated$72,000 for related art projects. Twenty thousand dollars ($20,000) of that amount has already been used for a sculpture in the Piazza, "Summer Breeze," and a mural, "Our Adopted Community,"at the Renton Transit Center. • The Renton Municipal Arts Commission, which is charged with reviewing public art and making related recommendations to the Mayor, initiated a"Call to Artists" in November 2002. Of all the art submissions received, Mr. Elliott's concept was clearly preferred. Three thousand six hundred dollars ($3,600)was given to Mr. Elliott to provide additional design details. His original proposal has been reduced by that amount. The design concept was refined through a process of consultations with the Municipal Arts Commission, staff, and the Mayor. • Mr. Elliott has an extensive Public Art Project portfolio. A representation of the proposed project is attached as Exhibit 1, Representative Art. A written description of the project is attached as Exhibit 2. Other examples of Mr. Elliot's public art are attached as Exhibit 3. • The proposal submitted by Mr. Elliott was $44,564. As stated above, a design fee of$3,600 already paid leaves a remaining balance of$40,964. Staff performed a due diligence review of the project for its safety and suitability inside the elevator hoist way at the Municipal Parking Garage. Because artwork is not a necessary piece of elevator equipment and therefore would not normally be allowed in a hoist way, a variance was required from the Elevator Section of the Department of Labor& Industries. It was granted with the stipulation that a licensed elevator mechanic must supervise the installation. The contracted elevator service company has given a preliminary estimate of$2,880 for this service, but there is at least six months to find ways to reduce this amount. • Furthermore, the acrylic backing panels commonly used by Mr. Elliott had too high a flame spread rating for this installation. The upgrade to an approved polycarbonate panel,that is also UV-resistant, will cost an additional $4,930.11. Materials required by Facilities Tech staff to install the panels will cost roughly $400. These changes raise the total project cost to $52,774.11, with a balance due %me to the artist of$45,894.11. • Funding is available from Fund 125, 1%for Art Fund. Conclusion: This large-scale art project by a recognized artist will be a dynamic visual attraction in downtown Renton and a welcome addition to the City's art collection. Attachments as stated C: Jay Covington Victoria Runkle Larry Warren Contract between the City of Renton, Washington And Richard C. Elliott THIS AGREEMENT, dated this of , 2005 by and between the City Of Renton, Washington, a municipal corporation, hereinafter referred to as the City, and RICHARD C. ELLIOTT, hereinafter referred to as the Artist. WHEREAS,the City has allocated a certain portion of capital outlay funds in conjunction with a 1% for Art Program for a Municipal Parking Garage Art Project, WHEREAS, for this portion of the said 1% for Art Program, an original work(s) of art will be designed for the City; and WHEREAS, the Artist has worked with representatives from the Municipal Arts Commission to develop a concept for the Municipal Parking Garage Art Project; and WHEREAS,the Artist has submitted designs for review and approval to the Arts Commission, Mayor and City Council; and NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual promises and covenants herein contained to be kept,performed, and fulfilled by the respective parties hereto, and other good consideration, it is mutually agreed as follows: 1. Scope of Work: The Artist's services under this agreement shall consist of ` ' and be limited to the following: Complete and submit conceptual designs for the project,produce and install the finished work(s) of art by a mutually agreed upon date. 2. Deliverables: The Artist's deliverables under this contract will be: Task 1. Drawings,written description and/or other materials, which will provide an adequate depiction of the Artist's concept(s), including proposed location(s). Task 2. Upon approval of the concept by the City,the Artist will produce the approved work(s) of art and install or assist in the installation of the work(s), on a mutually agreed upon date. 3. Compensation: The City agrees to pay the Artist a total fee of $45,894.11, as specified in the schedule below: Payments totaling$23,000 upon activation of the contract,to purchase materials needed to begin construction of the art. One payment of$15,394.11 upon completion of the fabrication of the work of art. "44wie Contract between the City of Renton And Richard C.Elliott Page 2 of 3 One payment of$7,500 upon installation and inspection of the work of art at the Renton Municipal Parking Garage. 4. Independent Contractor. The Artist is, and shall be at all times during the term of this Agreement, an independent contractor and not an employee of the City. 5. Modification: Any modification of the terms of this Agreement, including assignment of rights or obligations, shall be in writing and signed by all parties. 6. Ownership of Documents and Models: Original drawing, specification, and models of the proposed work(s), which are related to the work, including all preliminary studies, shall be the property of the artist following completion of the work under this Agreement. They shall not be used by the City of Renton on other projects except pursuant to a subsequent agreement in writing between all parties. 7. Copyright: The Artist shall retain copyright to all designs produced under this contract. , , 8. Termination: Either party may terminate this Agreement upon thirty(30) days written notice to the other party delivered by certified mail or in person. In the event the City seeks to terminate the contract,the Artist will be compensated for work completed to date. If the artist terminates this contract before completion and installation of the work(s) of art, any monies advanced to him shall be returned to the City. 9. Assignments: This Agreement may not be assigned or otherwise transferred. 10. Changes: No change, alteration, modification or addition to this Agreement will be effective unless in writing and properly signed by the parties hereto. 11. Hold Harmless: The Artist shall protect,defend, indemnify and save harmless the City, its officers, employees, and agents from any and all costs, claims,judgements, and/or awards of damages from the negligent acts of the Artist. The City shall protect, defend, indemnify, and save harmless the Artist,his/her employees and agents from any and all costs, claims, judgements, and/or awards of damages, arising out of or in any way resulting from the negligent acts of the City, its employees, officers and/or agents. Contract between the City of Renton And Richard C.Elliott Page 3 of 3 Now- 12. Arbitration: Claims and disputes between the parties arising out of or relating to this agreement shall be decided by arbitration in accordance with the construction industry arbitration rules of the American Arbitration Association then in effect, unless the parties agree to use other arbitration rules or services. Nothing in this paragraph shall prohibit or limit the parties' rights to mediate or negotiate any dispute. IN WITNESS WHEREOF,the parties have executed this Agreement on the date stated above. CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON ARTIST Kathy Keolker-Wheeler, Mayor Richard C. Elliott 101 N. Pearl Ellensburg, WA 98926 Phone: (509) 925-3224 vo,.e Attest: City Clerk Approved as to form: Lawrence J. Warren, City Attorney EXHIBIT 1 Art Installation by Richard C. Elliott proposed for the Renton Parking Garage '''S i '.:, f :,i i „,,,,' ....,r, ate:;. x '"�� :: ,_' a == 3 ' f. 0 ti k- 'S fie" x '':;"''.i'_. q, g "'"'"'.w. `; fir/, oi . - ` i gL F G > '_ $ ':k r4.x a ,,,,.4.1 . 'r., ' ' *''- '':. .,:. I- :.„ -: is - R{ s .. i litof EXHIBIT 2 Project Description, Renton Municipal Parking Garage This work will be comprised of 17 intricate reflective panels creating a unified design evocative of the Cedar River. Richard Elliott's specialty is two-dimensional geometric patterns of a type found in nature and native cultures around the world. These particular panels will be constructed with 1" and 3" diameter industrial-grade white, red, amber, blue, and green reflectors arranged in "river stream form," adhered to UV-resistant polycarbonate panels, and then mounted on the interior of the southern face of the western elevator hoist way, within the mullion assembly of the windows, using standard metal extrusions. The work of art will be dynamic, not only because of the character of its intrinsic graphic composition, but because ambient and direct light reflections, both natural and electrical, create multiple and ever-changing visual stimuli. The Municipal Arts Commission feels this art piece is particularly apropos to the downtown because of the inspiration of the Cedar River in this area. It is apropos to the Municipal Parking Garage because the use of roadway reflectors pays tribute to the transportational foundation of the garage and because the scale of the project suits the size of the structure. And finally, this work is a particularly suitable urban art form because its secured installation is not easily subject to vandalism. err EXHIBIT 3 Representative Public Art Installations by Richard C. Elliott J 4 It's the Wave Not the Water Cycle of the Sun Hinsdale Wave Research Laboratory Henry Gallery Oregon State University University of Washington Corvallis, Oregon Seattle,WA 2004 1989-90 Reflections On the Columbia Circle Of Light Sponsored by the Pateros Chamber of Sponsored by Washington State Art In Public Commerce • Pateros WA Places &Yakima County 1992 Yakima Sun Dome Yakima WA 1992 CITY OF RENTON COUNCIL AGENDA BILL AI#: gih. I Submitting Data: Planning/Building/Public Works For Agenda of: February 7, 2005 Dept/Div/Board.. Development Services Division Staff Contact Arneta Henninger X7298 Agenda Status Consent X Subject: Public Hearing.. CEDAR AVENUE FINAL PLAT Correspondence.. Ordinance File NO.: LUA 04-137FP (Preliminary Plat LUA 02- Resolution X 125) Old Business Exhibits: New Business 1. Resolution and legal description Study Sessions 2. Staff report and Recommendation January 28, 2005 Information Recommended Action: Approvals: Council concur Legal Dept X Finance Dept Other Fiscal Impact: N/A Expenditure Required... Transfer/Amendment Amount Budgeted Revenue Generated kiwi Total Project Budget City Share Total Project.. SUMMARY OF ACTION: The recommendation for approval of the referenced final plat is submitted for Council action. This final plat subdivides 9.5 acres into 50 single family residential lots with water, sanitary sewer, storm drainage, street lighting,curb and gutter, sidewalks and street improvements. Design and construction of utilities, lighting and pavement will be approved,accepted or deferred (and a security device posted)as required through the Board of Public Works prior to recording the plat. All conditions placed on the preliminary plat by the City of Renton will be met prior to recording the plat. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Approve the Cedar Avenue Final Plat, LUA 04-137FP,with the following conditions and adopt the resolution. 1. All plat fees shall be paid prior to recording the plat. 2. All plat improvements shall be either constructed or deferred to the satisfaction of City staff prior to recording the plat. I:\Templates\AGNBHPII.doc! CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON `taw RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON, APPROVING FINAL PLAT (CEDAR AVENUE; FILE NO. LUA-04- 137FP). WHEREAS, a petition for the approval of a final plat for the subdivision of a certain tract of land as hereinafter more particularly described, located within the City of Renton, has been duly approved by the Planning/Building/Public Works Department; and WHEREAS, after investigation, the Administrator of the Planning/Building/Public Works Department has considered and recommended the approval of the final plat, and the approval is proper and advisable and in the public interest; and WHEREAS, the City Council has determined that appropriate provisions are made for the public health, safety, and general welfare and for such open spaces, drainage ways, streets or Now roads, alleys, other public ways, transit stops, potable water supplies, sanitarywastes, parks and recreation, playgrounds, schools, schoolgrounds, sidewalks and other planning features that assure safe walking conditions for students who walk to and from school; and WHEREAS, the City Council has determined that the public use and interest will be served by the platting of the subdivision and dedication; NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON, DO ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS: SECTION L The above findings are true and correct in all respects. SECTION H. The final plat approved by the Planing/Building/Public Works Department pertaining to the following described real estate, to wit: See Exhibit "A" attached hereto and made a part hereof as if fully set forth `err' 1 RESOLUTION NO. (The property, consisting of approximately 9.5 acres, is located in the vicinity of Wells Avenue S., S. 36th Street and Cedar Avenue S.) Noid is hereby approved as such plat, subject to the laws and ordinances of the City of Renton, and subject to the findings, conclusions, and recommendation of the Planning/Building/Public Works Department dated January 28, 2005. PASSED BY THE CITY COUNCIL this day of , 2005. Bonnie I. Walton, City Clerk APPROVED BY THE MAYOR this day of , 2005. Kathy Keolker-Wheeler, Mayor Approved as to form: Lawrence J. Warren, City Attorney RES.1093:01/31/05:ma 2 EXHIBIT 'A' Now Legal Description Parcel A, City of Renton Lot Line Adjustment No. LUA-04-049 recorded under Recording Number 20040720900002, said Lot Line Adjustment being a portion of the southwest quarter of the southwest quarter of Section 29, Township 23 North, Range 5 East, W.M., in King county, Washington. co \-4,-,_ E ' EC DAR AVE SE IIr 174th S 1 0 -11-rii, 1 144 ch 1761 . ST .tc\ I Ra Aink CEDAR AVENUE 'ice' VICINITY MAP NOT TO SCALE /00.0010101 /4711 J,Washington Plate, 800 CC) ' Bellevue,t29t 980077 423.885.7877 Fats 425,885.7963 kriorm;000000A:FN ENGINEERING • PLANNING • SURVEYING ..1COE3 NC?_ 034211. �2 DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DIVISION Novo BUILDING/PLANNING/PUBLIC WORKS CITY OF RENTON STAFF REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS APPLICANT: Cedar Avenue,LLC Cedar Avenue Final Plat (Preliminary Plat LUA 02-125PP) File: LUA 04-137FP LOCATION: Wells Ave S, S 36th St,Cedar Ave S Section 29,Twp. 23 N.Rng. 5 E. SUMMARY OF REQUEST: Final Plat for 50 single family residential lots with water, sewer, storm, streets and lighting. RECOMMENDATION: Approve With Conditions FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS&RECOMMENDATION Having reviewed the record documents in this matter, staff now makes and enters the following: FINDINGS: 1. The applicant, Cedar Avenue, LLC, filed a request for approval of a 50 lot Final Plat. 2. The yellow file containing all staff reports, the State Environmental Policy Act(SEPA)documentation and other pertinent materials was entered into the record as Exhibit No. 1. 3. The Environmental Review Committee (ERC), the City's responsible official, issued a Determination of Non-Significance-Mitigated on April 22,2003, for the subject proposal. 4. The subject proposal was reviewed by all departments with an interest in the matter. 5. The subject site is located at Wells Ave S, S 36th St and Cedar Ave S. The new plat is located in Section 29,Twp. 23 N. Rng. 5 E. 6. The subject site is a 9.5 acre parcel. 7. The Preliminary Plat received City of Renton Council approval on August 4,2003. 8. The property is located within the R-10. 9. The Final Plat complies with both the Zoning Code and the Comprehensive Plan. Airok 10. The Preliminary Plat was subject to a number of conditions as a result of both environmental review and plat review. The applicant has complied with the conditions imposed by the ERC: 1. The applicant shall comply with the recommendation contained within the Coal Mine Hazard Assessment and Geotechnical Engineering Evaluation Report,prepared by Icicle Creek Ntidd Engineers, Inc. dated September 24, 2002 with regard to:site preparation, general earthwork, excavations, cut and fill slopes,fill settlements and lateral resistance; use of structural fill and spread footings; design of floor slab support, sub grade walls, utilities and pavements and methods of erosion control and permanent drainage measures. The satisfaction of these requirements shall be subject to the review and approval of Development Services Division prior to the issuance of construction and building permits. This measure has been met by action taken by the Developer and the completion of construction of the approved engineering plans. 2. The applicant shall install a silt fence along the down slope perimeter of the area that is to disturbed. The silt fence shall be in place before clearing and grading is initiated and shall be constructed in conformance with the specifications presented in Section D.4.3.1 of the King County Surface Water Design Manual, Appendix D. The satisfaction of this requirement shall be required during the construction of both off-site and on-site improvements as well as building construction. This measure has been met by action taken by the Developer and the completion of construction of the approved engineering plans. 3. Shallow drainage swales shall be constructed to intercept surface water flow and rout the flow away from the construction area to a stabilized discharge point. Vegetation growth shall be established in the ditch by seeding or placing sod. Depending on site grades, it may be necessary to line the ditch with rock to protect the ditch from erosion and to reduce flow rates. The design and construction of drainage swales shall conform to the specifications presented in ��g Section 4.4.1 of the SWDM. Temporary pipe systems should also be used to convey storm water Ne across the site. The satisfaction of this requirement shall be required during the construction of both off-site and on-site improvements as well as building construction. This measure has been met by action taken by the Developer and the completion of construction of the approved engineering plans. 4. The project contractor shall perform daily review and maintenance of all erosion and sedimentation control measures at the site during the construction of both off-site and on-site improvements as well as building construction. This measure has been met by action taken by the Project Contractor. 5. Weekly reports on the status and condition of the erosion control plan with any recommendations of change or revision to maintenance schedules or installation shall be submitted by the project Engineer of record to the Public Works Inspector for the preliminary plat construction. Certification of the installation, maintenance and proper removal of the erosion control facilities shall be require prior to the recording of the plat. This condition is being satisfied by action taken by the Project Geotechnical Engineer. 6. The development shall not place any building structures, storm water detention facilities, roads or utilities within the designated high hazard areas and shall be restricted from the use of mine rock fill contained more than 20%coal by weight as structural fill. The satisfaction of these requirements shall be subject to the review and approval of Development Services Division throughout the duration of site preparation and building construction activities. 2 CEDARAVEFP.DOC/ This measure has been met by action taken by the Developer and the completion of construction of the approved engineering plans. err► 7. The applicant shall place a note on the face of the plat, as well as record a restrictive covenant, subject to the review and approval of the City Attorney and the Property Services Section,prior to the recording of the plat which states the following. COAL MINE HAZARD NOTICE The lots created herein fall within a coal mine hazard area as identified by a Geotechnical Engineer at the time of this subdivision. Presence of such a hazard may trigger mitigation measures at the time of the construction. No structures or improvements shall occur within high hazard areas. The note has been added to the Final Plat,and is subject to review and approval of the City Attorney prior to recording. 8. The applicant shall record a restrictive covenant to run with the land that states the Developer and all future homeowners will hold the City harmless from any damages occurring from land movement, slide, collapse or other similar event caused by the coal mines known to exist beneath the site. The satisfaction of these requirements shall be subject to the review and approval of Development Services Division and the City Attorney prior to the recording of the plat. An appropriate note has been added to the Final Plat,and is subject to review and approval of the City Attorney prior to recording. 9. The applicant shall install permanent split-rail fencing with signage at visible locations around the perimeter of the "high"hazard area within Tract B in order to provide adequate notice to residents or visitors that there are known coal mine hazards in this area. The satisfaction of these requirements shall be subject to the review and approval of Development Services Division prior to the recording of the plat. iron This measure will be met by action taken by the Developer and the Development Services Division. 10. The applicant shall comply with the 1998 King County Surface Water Drainage Manual Level 2 Flow Control for the project. The satisfaction of these requirements shall be subject to the review and approval of Development Services Division prior to the issuance of construction/utility permits. The approved engineering plans have been prepared according to the 1998 King County Surface Water Design Manual. 11. The tight-lined drainage system proposed to collect and reroute off-site drainage shall be sized to accept peak flows from the upstream basin in compliance with the 1998 King County Surface Water Drainage Manual. The satisfaction of these requirements shall be subject to the review and approval of Development Services Division prior to the issuance of construction/utility permits. This condition has been met through the design review process and the approval of the site construction plans. 12. The applicant shall comply with the Wetland Study Report and Mitigation Plat prepared by Talasaea Consultants, LLC dated October 24, 2002 with regard to buffer restoration measures. The satisfaction of this requirement shall be subject to the review and approval of the Development Services Division prior to the recording of the plat. The final wetlands mitigation plan has been approved by the City and the planting will be completed by the end of January 2005. *416,13 CEDARAVEFP.DOC/ 13. During site preparation and construction of improvements and residences, the applicant shall install silt fencing with brightly colored construction flags to indicate the boundaries of the wetland area and buffer. The satisfaction of this requirement shall be subject to the review and 40010 approval of the Development Services Division. This measure is being and will be met by action taken by the Developer. 14. After the development of roadway and utility improvements, the applicant shall install permanent signage and fencing(i.e. wood split rail) in order to prevent intrusion and provide identification of the wetland area and buffers. The satisfaction of this requirement shall be subject to the review and approval of the Development Services Division prior to the recording of the plat. This measure will be met by action taken by the Developer and the Development Services Division. 15. The applicant shall establish a Native Growth Protection Easement for all preserved wetland areas and buffers. A draft copy of the easement shall be approved by the City's Property Services Section and the City Attorney prior to recording. This measure will be met by action taken by the Developer prior to the recording of the plat. The location of the Native Growth Protection Easement and the necessary restriction has been provided on the Final Plat. It is subject to review and approval of the City Attorney prior to recording. 16. The applicant shall pay a Fire Mitigation Fee based on a rate of$488.00 per new single-family residence, with credit given for the existing home. The fee is estimated at$23,912.00(49 new single-family units x$488.00 = $23,912.00) and shall be paid prior to the recording of the plat. These fees shall be paid prior to the recording of the plat. 17. The applicant shall provide a minimum pavement width of 20 feet for all access roadways, shall `41r post all substandard roadways (i.e. those with less that 32 feet of pavement width) with "No Parking"signage and shall make all addresses visible from the public street. The satisfaction of this requirement shall be subject to the review and approval of the Development Services Division prior to the recording of the plat. This measure has been met by the completion of construction of the site improvements. 18. The applicant shall provide the necessary means of access(both primary and secondary) to serve the development. The satisfaction of this requirement shall be subject to the review and approval of the Development Services Division prior to the recording of the plat. This measure will be met by the completion of construction of the site improvements and action taken by the Developer and the Development Services Division. 19. The applicant shall pay a Traffic Mitigation Fee based on a rate of$75.00 per new average daily trip generated by the project with credit given for the existing residence. The fee for this project is estimated at$35,169.75(49 new single-family lots x 9.57 trips = 468.93 total trips x$75.00 = $35,169.75)and shall be paid prior to the recording of the plat. These fees shall be paid prior to the recording of the Final Plat. 20. The applicant shall pay a Parks Mitigation Fee based on a rate of$530.76 per new single-family lot with credit given for the existing residence. The fee is estimated at$26,007.24(49 new lots x $530.76=26,007.24)and shall be paid prior to the recording of the plat. These fees shall be paid prior to the recording of the Final Plat. 4 CEDARAVEFP.DOC/ 11. In addition,the applicant has complied with the conditions imposed as a result of Preliminary Plat: I. A covenant which addresses the approved density of the site and the dwelling unit mix approved 'virewith the plat shall be created concurrently with the recording of the plat. A draft of the document(s), shall be submitted to the City of Renton Development Services Division for review and approval by the City Attorney and Property Services prior to the recording of the plat. A restriction, approved by Susan Fiala with the City of Renton,has been added to the Final Plat addressing the approved site density. It is subject to review and approval of the City Attorney prior to recording. 2. The applicant shall revise the plat plan in order to provide the correct yard setbacks for Lot 35 and 50. The satisfaction of this requirement shall be subject to the review and approval of the Development Services Division prior to the recording of the plat. The lot lines have been revised. 3. The applicant shall obtain a demolition permit and complete all necessary inspections and approvals for the existing detached structures to be removed from the property. The satisfaction of the requirement shall be subject to the review and approval of the Development Services Division prior to the recording of the plat. The City has issued a demolition permit and a house and stable have been removed from the site and approved by the City. 4. The applicant shall indicate on the face of the plat the location and orientation of the front, rear and side yard setback for each of the lots as depicted on the approved plat plan and as referenced in the table included in the staff report. The satisfaction of this requirement shall be subject to the review and approval of the Development Services Division prior to the recording of the plat. Nitro' The front,rear and side yard setbacks,as shown on the approved Preliminary Plat,were indicated on the Final Plat based on the table included in the staff report, and subsequently removed per the City's Final Plat Review Comment#5, dated November 30,2003. 5. The lots which front both the public roadway and private street(Lots 5, 6, 11, 12, 33, 37, 44 and 48)shall utilize the abutting private street for driveway access and shall not be served directly off of the public roadway. The satisfaction of the requirement shall be subject to review and approval of the Development Services Division prior to the issuance of the construction permits for the installation of the roadway improvements for the development. A note restricting these lots has been placed on the Final Plat. 6. The applicant shall install permanent signage at the north end of public roadway "B", which indicates the roadway may be extended at a future date. The satisfaction of this requirement shall be subject to the review and approval of the Development Services Division prior to the recording of the plat. The city has approved the design of the sign and the sign has now been installed. 7. A homeowner's association or maintenance agreement shall be created concurrently with the recording of the plat in order to establish maintenance responsibilities for all shared improvements within this development. A draft of the document(s), if necessary, shall be submitted to the City of Renton Development Services Division for review and approval by the City Attorney and Property Services section prior to the recording of the short plat. Sow 5 CEDARAVEFP.DOC/ The covenants, conditions,and restrictions for the Homeowner's Association have been submitted to the City for review and have been approved by the City Attorney as to legal form. These documents will be recorded concurrently with the Final Plat. 8. The application shall comply with the conditions imposed by the ERC. The applicant has complied with the conditions imposed by the ERC. 9. The applicant shall provide a turnaround acceptable to the Fire Department. The turnaround can be abandoned or dismantled once adequate through or looped circulation is provided by development of adjacent properties. The plat of Sunnybrook has been developed and recorded providing looped circulation. 10. Since through roads are anticipated from the new access road, signs should be posted that prominently note that the stubs or cul-de-sacs will eventually create a roadway or roadways with through traffic. This measure will be met by action of the Developer. 11. The applicant shall be required to record restrictive covenants that mirror those required by ERC for the entire site regarding coal mine hazards. Appropriate restrictions have been noted on the Final Plat,which will serve as the recorded restrictive covenants. 12. The common open space area may create maintenance problems and the one adjacent to proposed Lot 47 should be incorporated into that lot, unless conveyed to a third party ownership. The open space panhandle and triangle adjacent to proposed Lot I need special treatment if portions of it are conveyed to Sunnybrook. The portions adjacent to proposed Lot 1 should be incorporated into that lot if the remainder is conveyed. ,„000, A City of Renton lot line adjustment has been processed and recorded removing the southerly panhandle from the project, and enlarging the area a the northeast corner of the site creating room for a full-sized lot and eliminating the open space. 13. The applicant shall obtain necessary "will serve"written confirmation that both domestic water and sanitary sewer services are available to serve the plat. The Developer has requested the will serve confirmation from the Soos Creek Water and Sewer District. The Final Plat generally appears to satisfy the conditions imposed by the preliminary plat process and therefore should be approved by the City Council. RECOMMENDATION: The City Council should approve the Final Plat with the following conditions: 1) All plat improvements shall be either constructed or deferred to the satisfaction of City staff prior to the recording of the plat. 2) All fees shall be paid prior to the recording of the plat. SUBMITTED THIS 28TH DAY OF JANUARY,2005 4„.„4, DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DIVIS 6 CEDARAVEFP.DOC/ a ' • cu 0 C cr•, /—CEDAR AVE SE 174th S SIE � T 7- 1,4 °ia 176t ST JR1 PR R© '*411.19 / gbh CEDAR AVENUE V!C/NMTY MAP NOT TO SCALE 14711 NE 29th Place,#101 COIN Bellevue, 877 Fox 4 98007 5. 85 +123.885.7877 Fox 425.88579b3 DESIGN ENGINEERING • PLANNING • SURVEYING C)E3 Nt7_ ©1©52 ) ) ) IUtusr PLAT 4F PLAt CF.INIrCR.� I (MARY INE 1 'tel 1)4 ►yY 7T-Ii L �7/36 30 40 41 42 1 4.1' 44 4SLIPPLATED N. uNT SWi/4,SWI/4 SEC.29-23-5 11 ..__ 50 41 42 45 46 N -� j2926 aTRACT 8 47 ^�40 43 44 siS nNTRACT A 2; ! 10 3' 48 Er 1 wcn r 36 v26 34t3N 3c 460025 w 33 37 12 tt 6 S.41 1 I 2a13 t0 2 5 4 2 1 V 1RAC1 C 1S I 1 16 23 1 221 21 I 20 1-19 1 '6 7 14 9 E 3 13°'~ y _W1,14, SWl 4 SEC. 29-23-5 r - - 1RAC1 A.CITY OF es E9 as 98\o7 !ia \ 98 ' 100 101 132 103 104 105 p E'I�~Wl TRACT C ��' ' N0. 1 PLAT OFi 04111ROOK �DD407]0000007 MDI..220 PO'S 30-19 `.......L. \ , \ .11°1.IIIICOIN 1471 1 NE 29th Place,#10 I OVERALL PLAT PLAN 'a 6ehewe,Washington 98007 425.8817877 Fax 125.885,7963 CEDAR AVENUE jik NOT TO SCALE oini DESIGN ENGINEERING • PLANNING • SURVEYING JC?B N[3_ ©1©52 EXHIBIT 'A' Legal Description Parcel A, City of Renton Lot Line Adjustment No. LUA-04-049 recorded under Recording Number 20040720900002, said Lot Line Adjustment being a portion of the southwest quarter of the southwest quarter of Section 29, Township 23 North, Range 5 East, W.M., in King county, Washington. P CITY OF RENTON COUNCIL AGENDA BILL AI#: Submitting Data: For Agenda of: February 7, 2005 11111.1 Dept/Div/Board.. EDNSP Staff Contact Shawna Mulhall, 6589 Agenda Status Consent X Subject: Public Hearing.. Correspondence.. $300,000 HUD Brownfield Economic Development Ordinance Initiatives grant. Resolution Old Business Exhibits: New Business Study Sessions Issue Paper Information Recommended Action: Approvals: Council Concur Legal Dept Finance Dept Other Fiscal Impact: Expenditure Required... $ Transfer/Amendment ilkie Amount Budgeted $ Revenue Generated $300,000 Total Project Budget $ City Share Total Project.. SUMMARY OF ACTION: The City has been awarded a$300,000 Housing and Urban Development Brownfield Economic Development Initiative(HUD BEDI) grant. The grant must be used in association with Port Quendall. Because freeway capacity and access are critical issues for all redevelopment projects, including Port Quendall, HUD has agreed to allow the funds to be used to help develop I-405 right-of-way plans in the North Renton area and to coordinate I-405 designs with the Port Quendall entrances. This allows the funds to be used within the constraints outlined by HUD and provides useful information for the Port Quendall redevelopment. Additionally, completed right of way plans for I-405 in North Renton will strengthen the North Renton I-405 project position for additional funding and is a critical step for both the I-405 Project,Port Quendall and other redevelopment efforts along I-405. Contracts for expenditure of the funds will be brought forward in the coming year. Receipt of funds is incremental and dependent upon contract billings. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Accept$300,000 HUD BEDI funds for plans and designs related to I-405 and the Port Quendall redevelopment work. Rentonnet/agnbill/ bh CITY OF RENTON ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT, NEIGHBORHOODS, AND STRATEGIC PLANNING DEPARTMENT MEMORANDUM DA"1'h: February 7, 2005 TO: Terri Briere, Council President Members of the Renton City Council VIA: , Mayor Kathy Keolker-Wheeler FROM: Alex Pietsch, Administrator Economic Development, Nei hborhoods, and Strategic Planning Department STAFF CONTACT: Shawna Mulhall ext. 6589 SUBJECT: Housing and Urban Development$300,000 Brownfield Economic Development Initiative Grant Nieroe ISSUE: The City has received a $300,000 Housing and Urban Development Brownfield Economic Development Initiative (HUD BEDI) grant. The grant must be used in association with Port Quendall. Because freeway capacity and access are critical issues for all redevelopment projects on these properties, HUD has agreed to allow the funds to be used to help develop I- 405 right-of-way plans in the North Renton area and to coordinate I-405 designs with the Port Quendall entrances. This allows us to use the funds within the constraints outlined by HUD and provide useful information for the Port Quendall redevelopment. Additionally, completed right-of-way plans for I-405 in North Renton will strongly position the North Renton I-405 project for additional funding and is a critical step for both the I-405 Project,Port Quendall, and other redevelopment efforts along I-405. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends accepting the$300,000 in HUD BEDI funds for expenditures approved by HUD. February 1,2005 Page 2 BACKGROUND SUMMARY: The City of Renton received a Housing and Urban Development Brownfield Economic Development Initiative (HUD BEDI) grant for $300,000 for Port Quendall redevelopment. While redevelopment of Port Quendall has slowed, main access to Port Quendall is from Interstate I-405, so appropriate I-405 capacity and access is a key issue in redeveloping the property. Many factors, such as interchange ramp improvements or avoiding environmental features, cause the I-405 alignment to shift for long distances so the adjustment can be safely integrated back into the mainline. Consequently, I-405 design adjustments made in the Port Quendall area extend beyond the immediate Port Quendall vicinity. For example, I-405 ramp adjustments at Port Quendall can extend south of the NE 30`h Avenue interchange, which in turn can affect the Park Avenue interchange design. As a result of this, HUD has allowed the City to obligate the HUD BEDI grant to transportation improvements within the North Renton area as long as they are directly linked and beneficial to Port Quendall redevelopment. Acceptance of the HUD BEDI funds will help move forward the North Renton 1-405 effort and access plans to Port Quendall. Current I-405 work within North Renton includes developing right-of-way plans. Completed right-of-way plans will strengthen the North Renton I-405 project position for additional funding and is a critical step for the I-405 Project, Port Quendall and other redevelopment efforts along I-405. Right-of-way plans are expected to be developed through a contract with the Washington State Department of Transportation (WSDOT), while Port Quendall entrance points will be evaluated by the City using a consultant. CONCLUSION: A critical redevelopment issue for Port Quendall is 1-405 capacity and access. Using the $300,000 HUD BEDI grant to help develop I-405 right-of-way plans and evaluate the Port Quendall entrance points will benefit the project and the City. Contracts and scopes of work for these projects will be developed and brought forward in the coming year. Receipt of funds is incremental and dependent upon contract billings. � A CITY OF RENTON COUNCIL AGENDA BILL AI#: 'J' Submitting Data: For Agenda of: likiwo Dept/Div/Board.. Finance&IS Department February 7, 2005 Staff Contact Victoria Runkle, Administrator Agenda Status Consent X Subject: Public Hearing.. Correspondence.. New Fees for Utility Outstanding Balance Search and Ordinance X Special Water Meter Read Service Resolution Old Business Exhibits: New Business Study Sessions Issue Paper Information Ordinances Recommended Action: Approvals: Legal Dept Refer to the Finance Committee Finance Dept Other Fiscal Impact: Expenditure Required... Transfer/Amendment Amount Budgeted Revenue Generated Total Project Budget City Share Total Project.. SUMMARY OF ACTION: Two Ordinances are presented to implement new fees when special services are requested by title and escrow companies, or buyers and sellers,or landlord and tenants for utility outstanding balance searches as well as special water meter reads. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends approval of the proposed two Ordinances. Staff also recommends that Finance staff conclude contracts with two principal Internet vendors for electronic utility balance search services. The value of these two contracts fall below $19,999,which is within the Administrator's authority to execute the contracts. H:\FINANCE\ADMINSUPWew Fees for Utility Balance Searches and Special Meter Reads.doc CITY OF RENTON FINANCE & INFORMATION SERVICES sla"'' MEMORANDUM DATE: January 24, 2005 TO: Ten-i Briere, Council President Members of the Renton City Council VIA: ,14-1l)Kathy Keolker-Wheeler, Mayor FROM: Victoria Runkle, Administrator ,f( ' STAFF CONTACT: Brian Hilderman, Business Systems Analyst SUBJECT: New Fees for Utility Outstanding Balance Search and Special Water Meter Read Service *r ISSUE The City of Renton does not currently charge for the manual search of utility outstanding balances and final estimates which Finance utility billing staff perform upon request. We propose providing to customers an electronic utility balance search service (hereafter referred to as EUBS) through vendors, with a manual search available as a backup. Staff also requests that a fee be implemented for both electronic and manual process searches. It is anticipated that charging a fee for manual searches will result in dramatically reducing the number of manual search requests. A fee to transfer a utility account is proposed. We also propose charging a fee for each requested special water meter read. Currently, all utility ratepayers subsidize the costs to provide manual utility outstanding balance searches and final meter reads. The proposed fees for specially requested utility billing services are similar in practice to Public Works charging fees for building permits and building inspections. Both are special services for one person or group. Several Washington cities have begun charging for utility outstanding balance searches and utility final reads. Other Washington cities that do not currently charge a fee are considering implementing similar fees in an effort to reduce staff time in processing special requests, and to recover the costs of special requests from those making the request for information. A comparison of the fees charged by other cities follow: warn► To: Terri Briere,Council President Members of the Renton City Council Subject: Fees for Electronic Utility Outstanding Balance Search and Final Meter Read Service January 24,2005 Page 2 Special New Account Electronic Manual Meter Account Transfer City Search Search Read Setup Fee Bremerton $30.00 $30.00 $20.00 $20.00 $5.00 Lynnwood $25.00 College Place $8.00 Mill Creek $25.00 Kent(proposed) $30.00 $30.00 Portland OR $20.00 PROPOSED FEES: RENTON $10.00 $30.00 $30.00 $25.00 $5.00 RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends that the City Council approve two Ordinances to implement new fees for utility outstanding balance searches, account transfers, new account setup, and special request water meter reads. Staff also recommends that Finance staff conclude contracts with the two principal Internet vendors for electronic utility balance search(EUBS) services. ,,, ' BACKGROUND SUMMARY The proposal is to provide the electronic utility balance information search (EUBS) service to title and escrow companies through two Internet based service providers. The service acts as a conduit between the City and the title and escrow requests. The City controls the data and the access to that data. The two vendors' Internet accessed programs allow the requesting company to print outstanding utility balances for a specific parcel. The program automatically calculates the payoff to the proposed closing date and provides per diem estimates. The information can be accessed in minutes, 24 hours a day, 7 days a week with high vendor contractual service levels. The title and escrow companies will no longer need to wait for Renton City Hall to open to obtain payoff totals. Finance utility billing staff will no longer be involved in manually researching and manually calculating the totals whenever escrow and title companies choose to request the payoff totals online through EUBS. We consider this issue an efficiency proposal. Efficiencies such as this will help Finance utility billing staff to keep up with their ever- increasing workload. The Finance Division's utility billing staff manually processes utility outstanding balance searches for title and escrow companies at the closing of Renton property sales. Title and escrow companies' fax, mail, or send by messenger their request for final outstanding utility balance information. By law, staff has three days to respond to the request if it is submitted by fax or messenger. Staff has seven days to respond if the request is submitted by mail (RCW H:\FINANCE\ADMINSUP\02_IssuePapers_memos to Council or Mayor\2005 Water Utility Fees.doc To: Terri Briere,Council President Members of the Renton City Council Subject: Fees for Electronic Utility Outstanding Balance Search and Final Meter Read Service January 24,2005 Page 3 Now 60.80.020). Staff must research the particular parcel for any outstanding utility bill and then calculate the total amount that will be due by the closing date provided to them by the title or escrow company. The total actual balance and an estimated closing bill is then faxed or mailed back to the title or escrow company. See Attachment 'A' process chart for proposed and current procedures. Nationally, title and escrow companies have been frustrated with the manual process and the time it takes to get the desired information. In Oregon, escrow and title companies went to the 1995 Oregon Legislature and persuaded them to pass a law requiring Oregon cities to provide their lien and outstanding utility balances information electronically. It was a frustrating and difficult process for the cities to provide this data electronically. Some cities in Washington have begun to make lien and outstanding utility balance data available electronically in anticipation of a similar law in Washington. Bremerton, Lynnwood, College Place, Mill Creek, and Des Moines have put their information online with a third party online service provider. Other Washington cities are in the process of setting this up, such as Kent, Kenmore, Lacey, Richland, Bainbridge Island, Covington, Bellevue and Pasco. Renton staff has evaluated EUBS for almost a year. When first evaluated, the company being evaluated, Webcheck Canopy, was not a mature product ready for City utilization. The City of Bremerton was the first city to adopt the vendor Webcheck Canopy's EUBS and they were "verySto much a development site for the application." After a year of use by Bremerton, the application is more mature and ready for the City of Renton to adopt. A competitor, Net Assets whose product is called Conduits, has a similar competitive product. Net Assets has many Oregon cities online as well as the City of Des Moines, Washington. Net Assets has been providing this service to cities for over three years. Vendor service levels, product maturity, and costs can be differentiated. The Webcheck Canopy system has four (4) Washington cities online. Conduits has twenty-eight (28) Oregon cities online and one (1) Washington city online. The first Conduits' client was Lake Oswego in 2001. Conduits is in the process of negotiating with Washington cities: Bellevue, Bainbridge Island, and Covington. One of the distinctions between the two vendors is Conduits would not charge the City of Renton for EUBS that are originated by the City. This will greatly improve our current manual process (see Attachment 'A') at no additional cost to the City. The other vendor, Webcheck Canopy, has agreed to a lesser price but that would cost the City approximately $6,000 per year. Also, the processing time to bring up a list of properties online is faster in Conduits. The fact that these are the two companies competing for cities in Washington, it would be prudent to adopt the services of both companies to extend our reach to every possible title and escrow company serviced by either vendor. This strategy would ensure we maximize the online services utilized and reduce manual processing by City staff. There is no city we are aware of that utilizes both vendors; a comparison of the vendor preference by title and escrow properties is not possible. The City receives fax/mail/messenger H:\FINANCE\ADMINSUP\02_IssuePapers_memos to Council or Mayor\2005 Water Utility Fees.doc To: Terri Briere,Council President Members of the Renton City Council Subject: Fees for Electronic Utility Outstanding Balance Search and Final Meter Read Service January 24,2005 Page 4 requests from title and escrow companies in the area of Tacoma to Lynnwood and Seattle to Bellevue. Both vendors are beginning to establish a presence in this area. Bremerton estimates that slightly more than half of all requests are now made online after a year of experience with one of the vendors. While 100 percent would be a preferred goal, some title and escrow officials prefer the fax or mail method to online requests or they are not set up electronically to allow them to utilize Internet services. We hope that by adopting both vendor products, the percentage of utilization will be greater than Bremerton's experience after one year. Our estimates are based on Bremerton's utilization rates. In addition to the efficiencies gained with EUBS, Finance utility billing staff and Public Works (PW) meter reading staff will also benefit by the proposed process change. Currently, PW meter readers are required to perform a `final meter read' or meter closing for each property closing and most residential tenant changes. Under this proposal, a final meter read will be eliminated if agreed upon by the seller and buyer (or landlord and tenant). The proposed process requires that the buyer and seller sign an agreement that each understands that a final meter read will not be performed. In 2004, PW meter readers performed 2,399 final meter reads at a cost of 127 labor days (as per the PW's Maintenance Services Division). If the buyer and seller do not agree to this estimate in lieu of a final meter read, a final meter read will be performed for the proposed service fee of$30. voird The challenge is to create an incentive for the buyer and seller to agree to estimated billing rather than a final meter read. Final meter read results in a tremendous effort that also includes the processing of paperwork, obtaining a refund check, and new account setup. The proposed fees should influence the buyer and seller decision to agree to an estimated closing bill. If the seller does not agree to an estimate, the seller will be subject to a $30.00 final meter reading, which compensates the City for the services performed by the PW Maintenance Services meter readers and Finance utility billing staff. The buyer will be subject to a $25.00 new account setup fee whenever the seller and buyer do not agree to an estimated utility billing close since extra work is required to set up a new account. If the parties agree to an estimated billing, the account is transferred at no service fee. All the information to enable an account transfer will be included on the buyer and seller EUBS form. This will reduce utility billing new account setups by making it a transfer of the account,rather than the creation of a new account. The fees are proposed to be the same for a final meter reading in the landlord and tenant environment. The current and proposed process is described in the flow chart in Attachment 'A', page 2. The process would eliminate the $30.00 fee to the landlord or tenant by offering the option for the landlord and tenant to agree to a utility billing estimate in lieu of a final meter reading. The proposed process is very much the same as the buyer and seller process described above. This would significantly reduce utility billing workload and reduce the number of final meter readings by the PW Maintenance Services meter readers. The current `Tenant Billing Form' would be amended for this proposed process. The account would be charged $30.00 for each special meter reading required. H:\FINANCE\ADMINSUP\02_IssuePapers_memos to Council or Mayor\2005 Water Utility Fees.doc To: Terri Briere,Council President Members of the Renton City Council Subject: Fees for Electronic Utility Outstanding Balance Search and Final Meter Read Service January 24,2005 Page 5 Nakuse Financial Impacts The EUBS service will pay for itself by billing escrow and title companies. This will reimburse the City for EUBS related expenses charged to the City by the EUBS vendors. The EUBS vendors will bill Renton monthly for the total number of electronic searches performed at their website, at $8 per search for a single property, within a seventy-day period. The City will then bill escrow and title companies for the activity. Financial Impact Analysis There are 2,000 total closings estimated in the coming 12 months. Of these total 2,000 estimated closings, 50 percent (1,000) of the requests by title and escrow companies for final utility balances will get the information they require online through EUBS. Of the 50 percent (1,000) online requests, 50 percent (500) of the buyers and sellers will agree to an estimated final utility bill in lieu of a final meter reading. The other half is estimated to require a final meter reading (this is based on Bremerton's actual experience). Of the 50 percent (1,000) manual requests, a similar split of buyers and sellers will agree to a final estimated utility billing in lieu of a final meter reading. Now 2,000 Estimated Closings in 2006 50% Online (EUBSZ 50%Manual Searches Electronic Utility Balance Search Request Utility Balance Search Request Online Vendor— 1,000 Fax/Mail/Messenger— 1,000 501 \ 50% 50% \540% Agree Estimate-500 Special Meter Read-500 Agree Estimate-500 Special Meter Read-500 (No meter read) (No meter read) 2006 Estimated Revenue Special Meter Read Fees: $30,000 ((500+500) * $30) Non-electronic Utility Balance Search Request: $30,000 (1,000 * $30) Electronic Balance Search Request(net): $2,000 (1,000 * ($10 fee- $8 cost)) Account Transfer: $5 * 900= $4,500 Total Estimated Fees 2006: $66,500 'Aftr H:\FINANCE\ADMINSUP\02_Issuepapers_memos to Council or Mayor\2005 Water Utility Fees.doc 41111111. To: Terri Briere,Council President Members of the Renton City Council Subject: Fees for Electronic Utility Outstanding Balance Search and Final Meter Read Service January 24,2005 Page 6 The total revenue is reduced by $4,000 (internal City searches * $4.00) if the City chooses only one vendor, Webcheck Canopy. City generated searches will cost $4.00 each with Webcheck Canopy. Conduits will not charge the City searches. CONCLUSION The City will save considerable time in processing manual requests for utility balances from title and escrow companies if the City adopts an Electronic Utility Online Balance Search (EUBS) option. By adopting fees for special water meter reads, the City should recover its costs for these services from those requesting the service. Currently, costs are subsidized by all utility customers. By adopting an EUBS with the option of the buyer and seller accepting an estimate in lieu of a special meter read, City staff will have more time to devote to the ever increasing workload. VAR/BH/dlf Attachments,as stated cc: Jay Covington,CAO Derek Todd,Assistant to the CAO H:\FINANCE\ADMINSUP\02_IssuePapers_memos to Council or Mayor\2005 Water Utility Fees.doc • ( ( ( 4 ADDENDUM'A'Page 1 of 2 City of Renton Final Utility EMI(UB)Process Chart Proposed and Current Process City Minty Wiley M. (Property Closing and Landlord/Tenant) en yendor Web umes uplat.eatly f IJ I— YES Buyer/Seller YES Escrow/Title parte to Escrow:Online Utility City Receives Payoff payment Proposed: Searches UB Estimated Final —0 Bill Estimate(s)printed --• Payoff from Escrow —/ applied eO to UB Balance Online UB Company ac unt Electronic Balance Search — V NO i Coy Bills Escrow Companies Otr City pays Vendor 58 per torch NO ♦ 610 per search. —► by Escrow. Stop / I Eserow:Online Utility Final Meter Reed CityReceives City Pap t Ct S Balance Bill Estimate(s)printed —► P.Aomf d gAt Day p Estimated company fy __p Estimated payment to Seiler via _ Closingo/ Escrow Company applied to account. Check 600 charge Escrow Requests Residential UB Leder Request V\ NO paf°sesimate. �aTd,aln.S3S fee. I Estimate UB'Estimate From Web Mailed or Buyer/Seller I—►Mailed/Faxed. Faxed to a tae to YES Escrow/Title Estimated Final Company UB f Re F,xqr y JJ �" Request st ---• done RCW 60.50.020 Escrow Requests Latter Request• 7day Rnide ► —�a5.aline >--— payoff aBfNte Spreadsheet Fax form meted Fan loran NO utilized: with UB Estimate to Property Calculate UB (per diem) Escrow Closes End Current: Manual Process estimate Co. wan so days Fax/messenger dday YES • Request wst —'�aadline — Check Final meter Final Data 1 Recehnd mad Input J _ Final DR/CR Credit YES Credit balance Processed PerfomNd. Springbrook /—� generated Balance? refunded to salter. a( Stop NO C Stop / ADDENDUM'A'Page 2 of 2 Tenant Landlord Current Utility Billing Process Finalo . )) Final mater/ Tenant Change \ LandbM SISS�� d / Tenant Loves Final Mehr Read read UB Billing to . r Tenanl BIlling Ferm perlormod. {.-y PropaM1y -► Requested performed. Tenant'! / - No Ito Owner) Amount NO Duel Stop ) Final Meter Read Final meter / Requested na \ pedorm d. YES Bal To \ Lananalora ent or Tenant Landlord Proposed Utility Billing Process .. Tenant& Bdl Fool Landlord Signs Landlord Agree YES Estimate To Tenant Change -1:Tenant Billing Form to UB Estimate- Tenant or Tenant Signs Landlord NO pefometer Final Meter Readr a Requested performed. $3000 CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON O ,4? ORDINANCE NO. 44,c). '`orr AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON, ADOPTING SERVICE FEES FOR SPECIAL METER READ, NEW UTILITY ACCOUNT SETUP,AND NAME CHANGE SERVICES. THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON, DOES ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS: WHEREAS, the City provides special request water meter readings to Title and Escrow companies at the close of property sales in Renton and the City processes new utility billing accounts and transfers accounts. WHEREAS, the cost of providing a water utility outstanding balance search, creating new utility billing accounts and transferring accounts should be paid by those requesting the information, and not by all rate payers. Niomv WHEREAS, the City Council has determined that fees assessed in the amount; thirty dollars ($30.00) for a special request water meter reading, twenty dollars ($25.00) for a utility new account setup; and five dollars ($5.00) for a utility billing account transfer are reasonable fees and these fees are based on the actual cost of providing these special services. NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON,DO HEREBY ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS: SECTION I. Effective May 1, 2005, for each utility account transfer, a fee will be assessed in the amount of five dollars ($5.00). For each new account setup, a fee will be assessed in the amount of twenty-five dollars ($25.00). And, for each request for a special water meter reading, a fee of thirty dollars ($30.00)will be assessed. H:\FINANCE\ADMINSUP\03_Ordinances_Resolutions\Ordinance re City Water Meter Reading Fees_2005.doc CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON 404) ORDINANCE NO. q� PASSED BY THE CITY COUNCIL this day of , 2005. Bonnie I. Walton, City Clerk APPROVED BY THE MAYOR this day of , 2005. Kathy Keolker-Wheeler, Mayor Approved as to form: Lawrence J. Warren, City Attorney Date of Publication: Noid H:\FINANCE\ADMINSUP\03_Ordinances_Resolutions\Ordinance re City Water Meter Reading Fees_2005.doc CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON ORDINANCE NO. a 4) 41,c). AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON, ADOPTING SPECIAL SERVICE FEES FOR UTILITY OUTSTANDING BALANCE SEARCH. THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON, DOES ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS: WHEREAS, the City provides utility outstanding balances to Title and Escrow companies at the close of property sales in Renton. WHEREAS, the cost of providing a utility outstanding balance search should be paid by those requesting the information, and not by all rate payers. WHEREAS, the City Council has determined that fees assessed in the amount of ten dollars ($10.00) for an Internet water utility balance search; and thirty dollars ($30.00) for a water utility outstanding balance search requested by fax, messenger or letter are reasonable fees and these fees are based on the actual cost of providing these special services. NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON,DO HEREBY ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS: SECTION I. Effective May 1, 2005, for each Internet water utility outstanding balance search, a fee will be assessed in the amount of ten dollars ($10.00). For each water utility outstanding balance search, requested by fax or letter, a fee will be assessed in the amount of thirty dollars ($30.00). H:\FINANCEWDMINSUP\03_Ordinances_Resolutions\Ordinance re City UB Search Fees_2005.doc CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON 4040A ORDINANCE NO. �P PASSED BY THE CITY COUNCIL this day of , 2005. Bonnie I. Walton, City Clerk APPROVED BY THE MAYOR this day of , 2005. Kathy Keolker-Wheeler, Mayor Approved as to form: Lawrence J. Warren, City Attorney Date of Publication: H:\FINANCE\ADMINSUP\03_Ordinances_Resolutions\Ordinance re City UB Search Fees_2005.doc CITY OF RENTON COUNCIL AGENDA BILL I AI#: �' 14. I Submitting Data: For Agenda of: kiiive Dept/Div/Board.. Finance& IS Dept. February 7, 2005 Staff Contact Linda Parks, Fiscal Services Director Agenda Status Ext. 6929 Consent X Subject: Public Hearing.. Update of Resolution"Authorizing Signature for Correspondence.. Depositories and Electronic Fund Transfers on Behalf of Ordinance and in the Name of the City of Renton" Resolution X Old Business Exhibits: New Business Study Sessions Resolution Information Recommended Action: Approvals: Legal Dept X Council concur Finance Dept X Other Fiscal Impact: $0 Expenditure Required... Transfer/Amendment Amount Budgeted Revenue Generated Total Project Budget City Share Total Project.. SUMMARY OF ACTION: The proposed Resolution updates Section I and Section IV of Resolution 3706. These sections identify the individuals that are authorized to initiate and/or approve electronic fund transfers for the purpose of disbursing and depositing City funds. The funds are then used for the purposes of investing,cash management,and accomplishing authorized City business in the City's name. The changes are: delete Victoria Runkle from Section I and IV, delete Sylvia Doerschel from Section IV, add Linda Parks to Section I, and add Cindy Zinck to Section IV. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Authorize the Mayor and City Clerk to execute the proposed Resolution that updates Section I and Section N of Resolution 3706. H:\FINANCEWDMINSUP\01 AgendaBills\Resolution re Authorizing Signatures_01_24_2005.doc CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON, AUTHORIZING SIGNATURE FOR DEPOSITORIES AND ELECTRONIC FUND TRANSFERS ON BEHALF OF AND IN THE NAME OF THE CITY OF RENTON. WHEREAS, the City of Renton maintains one or more accounts at one or more qualified public depositories, including the state operated Local Government Investment Pool for primary banking, investing, or third party trust agreement purposes; and WHEREAS, the City's appointed Finance & Information Services Administrator is hereby authorized and directed to open and maintain these accounts as required from time to time on behalf of and in the name of the City of Renton; NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RENTON, �lrrr' WASHINGTON, DO RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS: SECTION L The depositories are hereby authorized to honor and pay checks, drafts, and similar instruments in the name of the City of Renton and signed by any one of the following officers and officials of the City of Renton: Title Name Mayor Kathy Keolker-Wheeler Fiscal Services Director Linda Parks SECTION II. Any of the above named officers or officials are further authorized to endorse any such checks, drafts, or other instruments made payable to the City of Renton for the purpose of depositing same into the City's accounts. 1 mimisminimmimisummisr RESOLUTION NO. SECTION III. The designated depository for the account in the name of City of Renton Municipal Court(Municipal Court account)is hereby authorized to honor and pay checks, drafts, and similar instruments signed by the Court Services Director or Municipal Court Judge. The Director or Judge are further authorized to endorse checks, drafts, or other instruments made payable to the City of Renton for the purpose of depositing the same into the Municipal Court account. Title Name Court Services Director Joseph T. McGuire Muncipal Court Judge Terry L. Jurado SECTION IV. The following individuals are authorized to initiate and/or approve electronic fund transfers for the purposes of disbursing and depositing City funds for the purposes of investing, cash management, and accomplishing authorized City business in the City's name: Title Name Initiate Approve Fiscal Services Director Linda Parks Yes Yes Finance Analyst Supervisor Cindy Zinck Yes Yes Finance Analyst Linda Dixon Yes No SECTION V. There shall be no obligation on the part of the depositories to see the application of funds in any case whatsoever, and that a true copy of this resolution be certified and delivered to each said depository at the time any such account is opened on behalf of the City of Renton. SECTION VI. Effective February I1, 2005, Section I and Section IV of Resolution No. 3706, which was passed and approved on August 9, 2004, is hereby repealed. 2 RESOLUTION NO. PASSED BY THE CITY COUNCIL this day of , 2005. '4••••• Bonnie I. Walton, City Clerk APPROVED BY THE MAYOR this day of , 2005. Kathy Keolker-Wheeler, Mayor Approved as to form: *time Lawrence J. Warren, City Attorney RES.1091:1/25/05:ma 1410,, 3 CITY OF RENTON COUNCIL AGENDA BILL AI#: 9, I, Submitting Data: For Agenda of: Dept/Div/Board.. Finance &IS Department February 7, 2005 Staff Contact Victoria Runkle, Administrator Agenda Status Consent X Subject: Public Hearing.. Correspondence.. Consultant Agreement for Information Services Ordinance Management with GM2 Systems (George McBride) Resolution Old Business Exhibits: New Business Issue Paper Study Sessions Proposed Consultant Agreement Information Recommended Action: Approvals: Legal Dept Refer to Finance Committee Finance Dept Other Fiscal Impact: Expenditure Required... $113,628 Transfer/Amendment Amount Budgeted $113,628 Revenue Generated Total Project Budget City Share Total Project.. (111101 SUMMARY OF ACTION: Staff presents an annual consultant agreement with GM2 Systems for Council's consideration. GM2 Systems has provided the City of Renton management services of the Information Services Division for nearly eight years. The relationship with GM2 was established when the City decided it needed outside expertise to obtain a new and different direction for Information Services. The City has established a clear understanding with GM2 on the expected working relationship with the City and staff, and GM2 has a clear understanding of the City's goals and objectives. GM2's contractual relationship and performance has always been and continues to be very successful. The City of Renton will save money and staff time by continuing its successful relationship with GM2 Systems. GM2 needs no training or oversight to continue its managements services of IS, which is an important fact to consider since the Administrator of Finance&IS is leaving the City effective February 12,2005. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Council concur with the Administration's recommendation to continue its agreement with GM2 Systems for management services of the City's Information Services Division. The 2005 cost is$113,628. H:\FINANCE\ADMINSUP\oI_AgendaBills\Agenda bill for GM2 Systems Agreement.doc CITY OF RENTON FINANCE & INFORMATION SERVICES DEPARTMENT MEMORANDUM 'fir DATE: January 28,2005 TO: Terri Briere, Council President Members of the Renton City Council VIA: , . Kathy Keolker-Wheeler,Mayor rr CC: �� Jay Covington,Chief Administrative Officer FROM: Victoria Runkle,Administrator SUBJECT: Consultant Agreement for Information Services Management ISSUE Staff presents a consultant agreement with GM2 Systems(George McBride) for management services of the Information Services Division. RECOMMENDATION Council concur with the Administration to continue the agreement with GM2 Systems for management services of the City's Information Services Division. This contract will be reviewed annually. The 2005 cost is $113,628. This money is in the Finance&Information Services' 2005 consultant budget. BACKGROUND SUMMARY GM2 Systems (GM2) has provided the City of Renton management services of the Information Services Division for nearly eight years. The president of GM2, George McBride, has provided strategic vision to Information Services, and he has provided oversight and direction to IS staff by helping them establish and meet priorities. This relationship with GM2 was established when the City decided it needed outside expertise to obtain a new and different direction for Information Services. At that time, staff decided that it would be best to hire outside expertise in order to implement the needed changes in terms of direction and staffing issues. We selected GM2 after working with another consultant, Moss Adams, to identify our needs and direction for Information Services. Once the decision was made, we focused on getting the work completed. GM2 has had an agreement with us over the years that basically required the same services as the proposed agreement. GM2 has filed all the required insurance forms, etc., since the original contract with GM2 was established. However, it is time to restate our intent and complete a new agreement. DISCUSSION There are two questions to consider when reviewing this agreement. The first is "why contract for management services as opposed to simply hiring an Information Services Director?" The second is"should we do a request for proposal for these services if we are going to contract just for management services?" TO: Terri Briere,Council President Members of the Renton City Council VIA: Kathy Keolker-Wheeler,Mayor January 28,2005 Page 2 *41110 The job description for the Information Services Director reads as follows: Under the Direction of the Finance and Information Services Administrator, plan, organize, direct and evaluate information systems and support services, including data processing, systems development, telecommunication, government access cable television, document printing and duplications, and City mail services for all City departments based on present and future needs, and direct development of efficient and cost effective information systems. Coordinate inter-departmental activities to formulate systems to increase the productivity of City staff. As you can see from the job description above, it is imperative that this position focuses on the strategic vision of the Information Services Division (IS), and to provide focus to IS employees on the best ways to implement that vision. It is essential that the position successfully work across city departments, and with other cities, so that we can develop strategies to leverage costs. Finally,this individual must require vendors to meet the parameters of their contracts with no uncertain circumstances. IS management has to play"hard ball"with vendors on many occasions. As to the question of whether we should contract out the management of IS, or hire an IS Director as a regular full time employee, staff believes that our relationship with GM2 Systems works very well for the City of Renton. Technology is very complex. We need to have someone that keeps very up-to-date on the many aspects of the field. And, we need a firm that keeps its contacts current with many areas of the field. GM2 meets these requirements. A full time director often gets mired in the day-to-day details of the city organization and is asked to come too many meetings. As the City's consultant, George McBride, has prioritized his time and has focused on the strategic vision for the City and on inter-governmental affairs. He manages the IS Division and works with employees on a day-to-day basis, as well as on supervisory issues. GM2 keeps abreast of the strategic direction for the City, talks to vendors, and has successfully maintained the general direction of the IS Division investments. Why not conduct a RFP process? We have developed the proposed agreement with GM2 that identifies the required scope of work. We have long ago established a clear understanding with GM2 on the expected working relationship with the City and staff, and GM2 has a clear understanding of our goals and objectives. GM2's contractual relationship and performance has been and continues to be very successful. At this point in time, it is Staffs view that to conduct a RFP process to find another firm would require unnecessary City employee time, effort, and expense. It would also detract from the actual work that needs to be accomplished on a daily basis. Finally, the Administration is very satisfied with both the quality of work received from GM2 and with the overall cost of the contract. Expectations on deliverables and technology needs from city departments would not be diminished during an RFP process. If we were to do an RFP for new IS management services, we would spend the next three months attempting to write the RFP and we would not be able to focus on the actual work that needs to be accomplished without spending additional resources. The question then is"would we get a better financial deal if we did an RFP?" The issue with an RFP in this situation is that we are hiring only for management services. In December, Human Resources completed a survey of other local city's on their equivalent IS Director position. A copy is attached. This survey demonstrates that the sixtieth percentile of the monthly base pay for the equivalent of Renton's IS Director position is $7,964 a month. If the City of Renton hired an IS Director as a regular FTE,we also then pay 2 ,, ► percent deferred compensation for total salary. The various direct benefits total approximately $1,760 a month (Medicare — 1.45%; SS 6.20%; PERS 1.4%; and various insurance costs = $1,030). The monthly H:IFINANCEIADMINSUP102_IssuePapers_memos to Council or Mayoi is contractB.doc TO: Tern Briere,Council President Members of the Renton City Council VIA: Kathy Keolker-Wheeler,Mayor January 28,2005 Page 3 Nrr+ estimated cost of an FTE Information Services Director is $9,883. Staff recommends staying GM2 Systems for management services at a monthly cost of$9,469 a month, effective January 2005. For the investment of $9,469 a month in 2005, the City receives over 40 hours a week in management services, with once a month weekend support when we do major upgrades on Sundays. GM2 also carries the 24-hour IS pager in a rotation. When GM2 carries the pager, this permits us to give staff members a break, and it saves the city money. For example, when a 2170 Union member carries the pager we must pay $2 an hour--whether or not the person is called upon. Many members of the IS staff belong to 2170. Other duties identified in the contract include providing overall strategic management of the City's technology direction; implementation of the strategic vision; technical project management and departmental assistance to help plan, organize, and evaluate information systems and support; and overseeing the telecommunications and print direction of the City. GM2 also provides budget development and oversight, and staff development. Finally, GM2 represents the City in larger forums that include an established working relationship with Valley Communications Center as well as with other local cities. CONCLUSION It is in the best interest of the City of Renton to continue its contractual relationship with GM2 Systems. Staff's asks that Council concur with their recommendation that the Mayor and City Clerk execute the proposed agreement with GM2. The City of Renton will continue to save money and staff time by continuing its successful relationship with GM2 Systems. GM2 needs no training or oversight, which is an important fact to consider since the Administrator of Finance&IS is leaving the City effective February 11, 2005. *goy VAR/dlf Attachment,as stated cc: Derek Todd,Assistant to the CAO H:(FINANCEADMINSUP102_IssuePapers_memos b Council or Mayortis contract_B.dac ( ( Information services Director 2005 Survey Detail Information Services Grade Department _ _ Director m38 Finance/IS Under the Direction of the Finance&Info. Svcs Administrator,plan,organize,direct and evaluate information systems and support services, including data processing,systems _ development,telecommunication,document printin•and duplication,and City mail services,for all City departments based on present and future needs. Direct development _ of efficient and cost-effective information systems. Coordinate inter-departmental activities to formulate systems to increase the productivity of City staff. 2005 Adj Cities Population Top of Top of Notes _ Salary Range Salary Range Auburn * 45,355 $9,119 $8,207 Info Svcs Dir reports to the Mayor (adj down 10% reports to Mayor)(adj 3% for 2005) Bainbridge Island 21,350 $8,533 $7,680 Information Technology Director Reports to City Administrator(adju down 10%, reports to CAO) Bothell 30,910 n/m The IT division report to the Admin Svcs Dir. Burien 31,480 n/m Des Moines 29,120 Edmonds * 39,580 $6,249 $6,249 Information Svcs Coordinator(Division Level) (I est.3% inc for 2005,City did not provide 2005%) _ Everett * 95,470 $8,101 $8,101 IT Manager Reports to Finance Director (I est.3% inc.for 2005,City did not provide 2005 %) Federal Way 83,500 $6,860 $6,860 Info Sys. Mgr Eligible for performance plan paid in lump sum annually of approx$500. Division Level Issaquah 15,110 n/m Position eliminated in 2005 budget Kent 84,210 $9,412 $8,470 Info. Tech. Dir reports to Chief Admin Officer(adj down 10% reports to CAO) Kirkland 45,630 $10,587 $9,528 Chief Info.Officer reports to City Manager (adj down 10% reports to City Mgr) Lakewood 58,940 $7,072 $7,072 Network Information Sys.Mgr Reports to Finance&Info. Sys. Director Lynnwood 34,500 $7,880 $7,880 Assistant Finance Dir-Information Svc Report to Admin Svcs Dir. Mercer Island 21,840 n/m Mountlake Terrace 20,380 n/m Olympia 42,860 $6,761 $6,761 IS Manager reports to Admin Svcs. Dir. Also receives premium pay of$262 per month Puyallup 35,490 Redmond 46,480 $9,263 $9,263 IT Manager Reports to Finance Director SeaTac 25,100 n/m Shoreline 52,730 $7,510 $7,510 Info. Sys. Mgr reports to Finance Director Snohomish 8,640 Tacoma 196,300 n/m IT Director report to IT Board and City Manager Tukwila 17,230 $5,641 $5,641 Systems Administrator reports to Dept.Director University Place * 30,720 $6,803 $6,803 Communication&Technology Services Director reports to Community Svcs.Director(est.3% inc 2005) 7 Renton 55,360 $7,953 $7,953 1.4% _ Median $7,695 $7,595 60th Percentile $8,057 $7,840 * I applied a 3%increase for 2005 wages,as City did not provide 2005 wages. Info Svs Director 2004.xls Detail Matches Page 1 1/26/2005 ANNUAL CONSULTANT AGREEMENT THIS AGREEMENT,made and entered into on this 1st day of January, 2005,by and between the CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON, A MUNICIPAL CORPORATION HEREINAFTER CALLED THE "CITY,"and 4,41.0George McBride, dba GM2 Systems,at 713 Industry Drive,Tukwila,Washington, 98188-3409, at which work will be available for inspection,hereinafter called the "CONSULTANT." PROJECT NAME: INFORMATION SERVICES MANAGEMENT WHEREAS,the City has not sufficient qualified employees to provide the technical systems management within a reasonable time and the City deems it advisable and is desirous of engaging the professional services and assistance of a qualified consulting firm to do the necessary work, and WHEREAS,the Consultant has represented and by entering into this Agreement now represents,all personnel to be assigned to the work required under this Agreement are fully qualified to perform the work to which they will be assigned in a competent and professional manner, and that sufficient qualified personnel are on staff or readily available to Consultant to staff this Agreement. WHEREAS, the Consultant has indicated that it desires to do the work set forth in the Agreement upon the terms and conditions set forth below. NOW THEREFORE,in consideration of the terms, conditions, covenants and performances contained herein below,the parties hereto agree as follows: I SCOPE OF WORK The Consultant shall furnish, and hereby warrants that it has, the necessary equipment,materials, and y professionally trained and experienced personnel to facilitate the provision of technical expertise in the area of computer,network systems, software applications and other technical areas relating to strategic planning, oversight of technology implementation within the City's environment,technical project management and depal tmental assistance with technical project management. The consultant shall plan,organize, direct and evaluate information systems and support including all data processing, systems development, telecommunications, document printing/duplication and City mail services for all City departments based on present and future needs,and direct development of efficient/cost effective information systems. The Consultant coordinate inter-departmental activities to formulate systems that will increase productivity of City staff. The Consultant represents the City of Renton's technical interests with outside groups including other jurisdicitions and peer groups.The Consultant takes direction from and reports to the Finance and Information Services Administrator. The Consultant also provides guidance and assistance to the Information Services Manager in areas of project management/staffing, staff development,budget development/oversight, staff development, and strategic and tactical planning. The Consultant shall perform all work described in this Agreement in accordance with the latest edition and amendments to City and state regulations,guidelines and policies. II ITEMS TO BE FURNISHED TO THE CONSULTANT BY THE CITY The City will furnish the Consultant office space,technology appropriate to complete the work, copies of documents which are available to the City that will facilitate the preparation of the plans, studies, specifications,and budget estimates within the limits of the assigned work. Page 1 of 6 ,a► ANNUAL CONSULTANT AGREEMENT • III OWNERSHIP OF PRODUCTS AND DOCUMENTS TO BE FURNISHED BY THE CONSULTANT *AS Documents, exhibits or other presentations for the work covered by this Agreement shall be furnished by the Consultant to the City upon completion of the various phases of the work. All such material,including working documents,notes, drawings,photographic negatives, etc.used in the project, shall become and remain the property of the City and may be used by it without restriction by both the City and Consultant. Any use of such documents by the City not directly related to the project pursuant to which the documents were prepared by the Consultant shall be without any liability whatsoever to the Consultant. All written documents and products shall be printed on recycled paper when practicable. Use of the chasing- arrow symbol identifying the recycled content of the paper shall be used whenever practicable. All documents will be printed on both sides of the recycled paper, as feasible. IV TIME OF BEGINNING AND COMPLETION The work detailed in the Scope of Work will be performed on an annual basis. It is agreed that all the Consultant's services and all deliverables are to be completed on schedules determined by the Finance and Information Services Administrator. Time schedules are subject to mutual agreement for any revision unless specifically described as otherwise herein. V PAYMENT The Consultant shall be paid by the City for completed work for services rendered under this Agreement as provided upon receipt and prompt processing of the Consultant's monthly invoice. Payment in the amount of $9,469 shall be paid to the consultant monthly. Such payment shall be full compensation for work performed or services rendered and for all labor,materials, supplies,equipment, and incidentals necessary to complete the work. VI CHANGES IN WORK The Consultant shall make all such revisions and changes in the Scope of Work as previously defined upon mutual agreement with the City. Should such work be out of the normal course of work for this type of engagement,additional compensation maybe negotitated between the Consultant and the City. VII EXTRA WORK The City may desire to have the Consultant perform work or render services in connection with this contract in addition to or other than work provided for by the expressed intent of the Scope of Work. Such work will be considered as Extra Work and will be specified in a written supplement to their contract,which will set forth the nature and scope thereof. Work under a supplement shall not proceed until authorized in writing by the City. Any dispute as to whether work is Extra Work or work already covered under this Agreement shall be resolved before the work is undertaken. Performance of the work by the Consultant prior to resolution of any such dispute shall waive any claim by the Consultant for compensation as Extra Work. Page 2 of 6 H:\FINANCE\ADMINSUP\Contracts\2005 GM2 Contract.doc ANNUAL CONSULTANT AGREEMENT VIII EMPLOYMENT err. The Consultant warrants that it has not employed or retained any company or person,other than a bona fide employee working solely for the Consultant, to solicit or secure this contract and that he has not paid or agreed to pay any company or person, other than a bona fide employee working solely for the Consultant, any fee, commission,percentage,brokerage fee, gifts or any other consideration,contingent upon or resulting from the award or making of this contract. For breach or violation of this warranty, the City shall have the right to annul this Agreement without liability,or in its discretion to deduct from the Agreement price or consideration or otherwise recover,the full amount of such fee, commission,percentage,brokerage fee, gift or contingent fee. Any and all employees of the Consultant,while engaged in the performance of any work or services required by the Consultant under this Agreement, shall be considered employees of the Consultant only and not of the City and any and all claims that may or might arise under the Workman's Compensation Act on behalf of said employees,while so engaged and any and all claims made by a third party as a consequence of any negligent act or omission on the part of the Consultant's employees, while so engaged on any of the work or services provided to be rendered herein, shall be the sole obligation and responsibility of the Consultant. The Consultant shall not engage, on a full or part-time basis, or other basis, during the period of the contract, any professional or technical personnel who are, or have been at any time during the period of this contract, in the employ of the City except regularly retired employees, without written consent of the City. If during the time period of this Agreement, the Consultant finds it necessary to increase its professional, technical, or clerical staff as a result of this work,the Consultant will actively solicit minorities through their advertisement and interview process. *Ilse IX NONDISCRIMINATION The Consultant agrees not to discriminate against any client, employee or applicant for employment or for services because of race, creed, color,national origin,marital status, sex, age or handicap except for a bona fide occupational qualification with regard to,but not limited to the following: employment upgrading; demotion or transfer;recruitment or any recruitment advertising; layoff or termination's;rates of pay or other forms of compensation; selection for training; or rendition of services. The Consultant understands and agrees that if it violates this Non-Discrimination provision,this Agreement may be terminated by the City, and further,that the Consultant shall be barred from performing any services for the City now or in the future,unless a showing is made satisfactory to the City that discriminatory practices have terminated and that recurrence of such action is unlikely. X TERMINATION OF AGREEMENT A. The City reserves the right to terminate this Agreement at any time upon not less than thirty(30) days written notice to the Consultant, subject to the City's obligation to pay Consultant in accordance with subparagraphs C and D below. B. In the event of the death of a member,partner or officer of the Consultant,or any of its supervisory personnel assigned to the project, the surviving members of the Consultant hereby agree to complete the work under the terms of this Agreement, if requested to do so by the City. This section shall not Page 3 of 6 H:\FINANCE\ADMINSUP\Contracts\2005 GM2 Contract.doc ANNUAL CONSULTANT AGREEMENT • be a bar to renegotiations of this Agreement between surviving members of the Consultant and the City,if the City so chooses. In the event of the death of any of the parties listed in the previous paragraph, should the surviving members of the Consultant,with the City's concurrence, desire to terminate this Agreement, payment shall be made as set forth in Subsection C of this section. C. In the event this Agreement is terminated by the City other than for fault on the part of the Consultant,a final payment shall be made to the Consultant for the full month in which the termination notice is received. Any additional work requested by the City of the Consultant after receipt of the termination notice will be performed at the Consultant's prevailing rates. In addition, the Consultant shall be paid on the same basis as above for any authorized extra work completed. D. In the event the services of the Consultant are terminated by the City for fault on the part of the Consultant,the above stated formula for payment shall not apply. In such an event the amount to be paid shall be determined by the City with consideration given to the actual costs incurred by the Consultant in performing the work to the date of termination,the amount of work originally required which was satisfactorily completed to date of termination,whether that work is in a form or of a type which is usable to the City at the time of termination,the cost to the City of employing another firm to complete the work required and the time which may be required to do so,and other factors which affect the value to the City of the work performed at the time of termination. Under no circumstances shall payment made under this subsection exceed the amount which would have been made if the formula set forth in subsection C above had been applied. E. Payment for any part of the work by the City shall not constitute a waiver by the City of any remedies of any type it may have against the Consultant for any breach of this Agreement by the Consultant, or for failure of the Consultant to perform work required of it by the City. Forbearance sod of any rights under the Agreement will not constitute waiver of entitlement to exercise those rights with respect to any future act or omission by the Consultant. XII DISPUTES Any dispute concerning questions of facts in connection with work not disposed of by agreement between the Consultant and the City shall be referred for determination to the Administrator of Finance and Information Services or his/her successors and delegees. In the event that either party is required to institute legal action or proceedings to enforce any of its rights in this Agreement,both parties agree that any such action shall be brought in the Superior Court of the State of Washington, situated in King County. XIII LEGAL RELATIONS The Consultant shall comply with all Federal Government, State and local laws and ordinances applicable to the work to be done under this Agreement. This contract shall be interpreted and construed in accordance with the laws of Washington. The Consultant agrees to indemnify,defend and hold the City and its officers and employees harmless from and shall process and defend at its own expense all claims,demands or suits at law or equity arising in whole or part Page 4 of 6 H:IFINANCE ADMINSUP\Contracts\2005 GM2 Contract.doc ANNUAL CONSULTANT AGREEMENT from the Consultant's errors, omissions, or negligent acts under this Agreement provided that nothing herein shall require the Consultant to indemnify the City against and hold harmless the City from claims,demands or suits based upon the conduct of the City, its officers or employees and provided further that if the claims or suits are caused by or result from the concurrent negligence of(a)the Consultant's agents or employees and(b) the City, its agents,officers and employees,this provision with respect to claims or suits based upon such concurrent negligence shall be valid and enforceable only to the extent of the Consultant's negligence or the negligence of the Consultant's agents or employees except as limited below. The Consultant shall secure general liability,property damage,and auto liability,in the amount of$1.0 million with a General Aggregate in the amount of$2 million,unless waived or reduced by the City. The Consultant shall submit a completed City of Renton Insurance Information Form, and the Standard Acord Certification Form prior to the execution of the contract. The City of Renton shall be named as an"additional insured"on all contracts/projects. The Consultant shall also submit copies of the declarations pages of relevant insurance policies to the City within 30 days of contract acceptance if requested. The Certification and Declaration page(s)shall be in a form as approved by the City. If the City's Risk Manager has the Declaration page(s)on file from a previous contract and no changes in insurance coverage has occurred, only the Certification Form will be required. The limits of said insurance shall not,however, limit the liability of Consultant hereunder. All coverages provided by the Consultant shall be in a form, and underwritten by a company acceptable to the City. The City will normally require carriers to have minimum A.M.Best rating of A XII. The Consultant shall keep all required coverages in full force and effect during the life of this project, and a minimum of forty five days'notice shall be given to the City prior to the cancellation of any policy. The Consultant shall verify,when submitting the first payment invoice and annually thereafter,possession of a ,. current City of Renton business license while conducting work for the City. The Consultant shall require,and provide verification upon request, that all subconsultants participating in a City project possess a current City of Renton business license. The Consultant's relation to the City shall be at all times as an independent contractor. XIV SUBLETTING OR ASSIGNING OF CONTRACTS The Consultant shall not sublet or assign any of the work covered by this Agreement without the express consent of the City. XV COMPLETE AGREEMENT This document and referenced attachments contain all covenants, stipulations,and provisions agreed upon by the parties. Any supplements to this Agreement will be in writing and executed and will become part of this Agreement. No agent,or representative of either party has authority to make,and the parties shall not be bound by or be liable for,any statement,representation,promise,or agreement not set forth herein. No changes, amendments,or modifications of the terms hereof shall be valid unless reduced to writing and signed by the parties as an amendment to this Agreement. Page 5 of 6 H:\FINANCE\ADMINSUP\Contracts\2005 GM2 Contract.doc ANNUAL CONSULTANT AGREEMENT The invalidity or unenforceability of any provision in this Agreement shall not affect the other provisions hereof,and this Agreement shall be construed in all respects as if such invalid or unenforceable provision were omitted. *41.00 XVI EXECUTION AND ACCEPTANCE This Agreement may be simultaneously executed in several counterparts, each of which shall be deemed to be an original having identical legal effect. The Consultant does hereby ratify and adopt all statements, representations,warranties, covenants,and agreements contained in the Request for Qualifications, and the supporting materials submitted by the Consultant, and does hereby accept the Agreement and agrees to all of the terms and conditions thereof. IN WITNESS WHEREOF,the parties hereto have executed this Agreement as of the day and year first above written. CONSULTANT CITY OF RENTON George McBride,President Date Kathy Keolker-Wheeler,Mayor Date GM2 Systems, ATTEST: Title Owner Bonnie I. Walton,City Clerk Nord Page 6 of 6 H:\FINANCE\ADMINSUP\Contracts\2005 GM2 Contract.doc CITY OF RENTON COUNCIL AGENDA BILL AI#: Q net, I Submitting Data: For Agenda of: 2/07/2005 Nile Dept/Div/Board.. Hearing Examiner Staff Contact Fred J. Kaufman, ext. 6515 Agenda Status Consent X Subject: Public Hearing.. Correspondence.. Kennydale Court Preliminary Plat Ordinance File No. LUA-04-085, PP, SA-H, V-H, ECF Resolution Old Business Exhibits: New Business Hearing Examiner's Report and Recommendation Study Sessions Legal Description and Vicinity Map Information Recommended Action: Approvals: Legal Dept Council Concur Finance Dept Other Fiscal Impact: Expenditure Required... N/A Transfer/Amendment kiwi Amount Budgeted Revenue Generated Total Project Budget City Share Total Project.. SUMMARY OF ACTION: The Hearing Examiner's Report and Recommendation on the Kennydale Court Preliminary Plat was published on January 4, 2005. The appeal period ended on December 18, 2005. The Examiner recommends approval of the proposed preliminary plat subject to the conditions outlined on page 6 of the Examiner's Report and Recommendation. Conditions placed on this project are to be met at later stages of the platting process. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends approval of the Kennydale Court Preliminary Plat. Rentonnet/agnbill/ bh January 4, 2005 'NowOFFICE OF THE HEARING EXAMINER CITY OF RENTON Minutes APPLICANT: Marc Rousso J &M Land Development, Inc. PO Box 2566 Renton, WA 98056 OWNERS: John J. Sargent LLC 2016 Edmonds Ave NE Renton, WA 98056 Bruce D. Collins 2032 Edmonds Ave NE Renton, WA 98056 Kennydale Court Preliminary Plat File No.: LUA 04-109, PP, ECF LOCATION: 2008, 2016, 2024, and 2032 Edmonds Avenue NE SUMMARY OF REQUEST: Approval for a 29-lot subdivision of two parcels, a 4.38-acre site intended for detached single-family residences. SUMMARY OF ACTION: Development Services Recommendation: Approve subject to conditions DEVELOPMENT SERVICES REPORT: The Development Services Report was received by the Examiner on November 23, 2004. PUBLIC HEARING: After reviewing the Development Services Report, examining available information on file with the application,field checking the property and surrounding area;the Examiner conducted a public hearing on the subject as follows: MINUTES The following minutes are a summary of the November 30, 2004 hearing. The legal record is recorded on CD. The hearing opened on Tuesday,November 30,2004, at approximately 9:00 a.m. in the Council Chambers on the seventh floor of the Renton City Hall. Parties wishing to testify were affirmed by the Examiner. The following exhibits were entered into the record: Exhibit No. 1: Yellow file containing the original Exhibit No.2: Neighborhood Detail Map Now application, proof of posting, proof of publication and other documentation pertinent to this request. Kennydale Court Preliminary Plat File No.: LUA-04-109, PP. ECF January 4, 2005 Page 2 Exhibit No. 3: Preliminary Plat Plan Exhibit No. 4: Preliminary Grading and Utility Plan Exhibit No. 5: Tree Cutting/Land Clearing Plan Exhibit No. 6: Zoning Map Exhibit No. 7: Environmental Review Committee Mitigation Measures and Project Advisory Notes to the Applicant. The hearing opened with a presentation of the staff report by Nancy Weil, Senior Planner, Development Services. City of Renton, 1055 S Grady Way, Renton, Washington 98055. The site is located on the east side of Edmonds Avenue NE between NE 20111 Street and NE 22nd Street. The address of the two parcels in question are 2008, 2016, 2024, 2032 Edmonds Avenue NE. The 29 lots proposed range in size from 4,500 square feet to 7,257 square feet for the development of detached single-family homes. The two parcels are currently developed with four single-family homes as well as various accessory structures. The property is zoned R-8 residential as is the surrounding properties. Site improvements include the construction of a 42-foot public road, and a storm water detention facility on Tract A. There are no critical areas on the site, the site is classified as gently rolling with a downward slope from east to west with an average slope range of 5% to 10%. The site is primarily an open field covered with pasture grass, shrubbery and trees. It is proposed that of the 35 to 40 trees on the site, approximately 20 will be removed. Staff would like to additionally recommend that the applicant plant two ornamental trees, a minimum caliper of one and a half inches (1-1/2") for deciduous or six to eight feet in height for the conifers for each new lot within the 20' front yard setback. The applicant would also be required to record a restrictive covenant for the property. The ERC issued a Determination of Non-Significance—Mitigated (DNS-M)with five mitigation measures. No appeals were filed. The proposed project was found to be in compliance with the Comprehensive Plan Designation that would allow for the future construction of new single-family homes. The site is also in compliance with the R-8 zoning designation. Each lot satisfies the minimum lot area and dimension requirements of the R-8 zone. The net density is 7.95 dwelling units per acre which is within the allowed density range of the zone. All lots appear to meet the minimum lot dimensions. All lots have adequate area to meet the minimum lot setbacks, however, each lot will be required to verify the appropriate setbacks prior to building permit approval. The lots also appear to be adequately sized for the provision of required parking. The lots are rectangular in shape with right angles to the street line and generally oriented with frontage towards the public right-of-way. Lots 1, 20 and 29 are considered corner lots. The applicant is not required to dedicate any additional right-of-way for Edmonds Avenue NE,they will be required to pave an additional five feet abutting the plat and provide curb, gutter and sidewalks. The internal proposed road would also require curb, gutter and sidewalks on both sides prior to being dedicated to the City. To ensure safe access to and from the proposed subdivision, no direct access from any lot within the plat shall be allowed onto Edmonds Avenue NE. The applicant would be required to install street lighting within the 42-foot wide internal street and along the western boundary of the development adjacent to Edmonds Avenue NE. A geotechnical report showed the soils on the site to be Arents. Some fill material was found and the applicant expects to excavate 2,500 cubic yards of material. It was concluded that the soils are suitable for the proposed 10804 development subject to the applicant doing all the earthwork activities in the drier summer months. Kennydale Court Preliminary Plat File No.: LUA-04-109. PP. ECF January 4. 2005 Page 3 Staff recommends the establishment of a homeowner's association or maintenance agreement for the two private streets. Private road signs must be installed indicating addresses served by the private street. Traffic, Fire and Park mitigation fees were imposed by the ERC. The subject site is located within the Renton School District and they have indicated that they can handle the proposed 11 new students from the new development. The applicant would be required to submit a Drainage Report per the 1998 King County Storm Water Manual. The water detention pond will be located on Tract A, at the southwest corner of this site. The staff recommends that the applicant be required to install site obscuring landscaping/fencing along the southern and western sides of the detention facility. The applicant would be required to construct an 8-inch diameter water line within the new road extension on NE 21St Street/Glenwood Avenue NE and an 8-inch diameter sewer main extension from Edmonds Avenue NE to serve the new lots. Staff recommends approval of the Kennydale Court Preliminary Plat subject to conditions. James Jaeger, Jaeger Engineers, 9419 S 204th Place, Kent, WA 98031 stated that they had reviewed the staff report and recommendations, there are just a couple of points that they would like to question. First, with the condition that Lots 25 and 21 have access from the private easement. This limits the product that can be placed on those lots with either a side or rear load garage, also. if you look at the distance, there is a combined 158' of '' frontage. If there were three 50-foot lots, as across the street, that would be three curb cuts which is what we would like to see, one for the easement and one each for the two lots. It appears that the street could easily accommodate additional curb cuts in that location without looking any different from what is across the street. Secondly, in regard to the ERC requirement of the April 1 to October 31 site work. That was taken out of the geotech report in which they were speaking of mass grading due to the fill on the site which will be removed and structural material brought in. That should be done in the drier season. It could be interpreted that no utility or roadwork could be done inside that period. The requirement should be cleared as to grading only in that time frame. The Examiner stated that that should have been addressed during the appeal period for the ERC conditions, he does not have much jurisdiction to tamper with the ERC conditions since the appeal period has run. Mr. Jaeger and staff may be able to work something out. Kayren Kittrick, Development Services stated that the turning radii that access Lots 21 and 25,there have been some problems with that,they are keeping a close eye on the situation. Alternatives are always a possibility as long as there are not too many curb cuts along the roadway. The April—October limit that was brought up, Staff would be happy to work with them. They will go back and see what the intent was of the ERC. Marc Rousso, 1328 Aberdeen Avenue NE, Renton, WA 98056 stated that they were here to make the City of Renton a better place and wants to put the best product out there for builders. With Lots 21 and 25, placing a side load may be a real challenge for a builder. However, the biggest challenge would be Lot 20, placing a side 'fir, load garage would be very difficult. He requested that the curb cut be placed between 19 and 20 and that there be no requirement for access to be off of 21St Street. Kennvdale Court Preliminary Plat File No.: LUA-04-109, PP, ECF January 4. 2005 Page 4 The Examiner called for further testimony regarding this project. There was no one else wishing to speak, and no further comments from staff. The hearing closed at approximately 10:13 a.m. FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS & RECOMMENDATION Having reviewed the record in this matter, the Examiner now makes and enters the following: FINDINGS: 1. The applicant, Marc Rousso, filed a request for a 29 lot Preliminary Plat. 2. The yellow file containing the staff report, the State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA) documentation and other pertinent materials was entered into the record as Exhibit#1. 3. The Environmental Revie\\ Committee (ERC),the City's responsible official issued a Determination of Non-Significance - Mitigated (DNS-M). 4. The subject proposal was reviewed by all departments with an interest in the matter. 5. There was no opposition from the public regarding the subject proposal. 6. The subject site is located 2008, 2016,2024 and 2032 Edmonds Avenue NE. The subject site is located on the east side of Edmonds north of NE 20th Street. 7. The subject site consists of two, side-by-side lots. Each of the lots contains two single-family homes and accessory structures. These buildings would be removed if the new plat is approved. 9. The map element of the Comprehensive Plan designates the area in which the subject site is located as suitable for the development of single-family uses, but does not mandate such development without consideration of other policies of the Plan. 10. The subject site is currently zoned R-8 (Single Family- 8 dwelling units/acre). 11. The subject site was annexed to the City with the adoption of Ordinance 4918, enacted in October 2001. 12. The subject site is a rectangular parcel that is 4.38 acres or 190,695 square feet in area. The subject site is approximately 615 feet long(east to west) by 157 feet wide, its frontage along Edmonds. 13. The subject site slopes downward to the west with grades generally 5 to 10 percent with a maximum grade of approximately 18 percent. The geotechnical report prepared for the project suggested that grading occur during the traditional drier months. 14. Approximately half of the 35 to 40 trees found on site would be retained along the perimeter mainly. Staff has recommended supplementing those with two new trees for each lot. 15. The applicant proposes dividing the existing two lots into 29 new lots. The proposed lots would range in size from approximately 4,500 square feet to 7,257 square feet. Kennydale Court Preliminary Plat File No.: LUA-04-109, PP, ECF January 4, 2005 Page 5 Noe 16. The applicant proposes basically a three-tiered lot layout along an east to west roadway. That roadway, probably NE 21st Street, would then curve to the south and connect to a stub of Glenwood Avenue NE. Two tiers of lots would be located east of Glenwood. 17. As proposed two easement roads would provide access to the interior lots. An easement between Proposed Lots 2 I and 25 would provide access to the third tier of lots, Proposed Lots 22, 23, 24 and 27. The second easement would provide access to Lots 12 and 15 along the eastern edge of the plat. A pipestem access would provide access to Proposed Lot 16. 18. Staff had recommended that both Lots 21 and 25 take their access from the easement rather than create additional curb cuts along 2I st. The applicant is concerned about the design of homes on those two lots. Additional concern was raised about the design of the home that would be located on Proposed Lot 20. a corner lot. 19. The plat's main access would be from Edmonds Avenue to the new street,NE 21st. Staff has recommended that no homes have direct access to Edmonds Avenue. Staff noted that Edmonds will have to be \\idened but right-of-way already exists. The new roads within the plat would he 42 feet wide and have all necessary improvements. 21. The development of the plat will generate approximately 290 vehicles trips per day or approximately 250 trips more than the four existing homes. 22. The development of 25 new homes will generate approximately 11 new students. The students will attend the Renton School District and students will be assigned to schools on a space available basis. ‘111rr' 23. Stormwater would be retained by a drainage tract, Tract A, located along Edmonds in the southwest corner of the plat. Staff recommended that it be screened. The proposal will be required to comply with the 1998 King County manual. 27. The density for the plat would be 7.95 dwelling units per acre after subtracting roadways. 28. The subject site will be served by City sewer and domestic water services. CONCLUSION: 1. The proposed plat appears to serve the public use and interest. The development will provide additional housing opportunities on what had been sparsely developed property. The area is served or can be readily served by urban services. The development of the new homes will increase the tax base of the City. 2. The plat meets the goals and objectives of the Comprehensive Plan. The lots meet the requirements of both the Platting and Zoning Codes. The lots appear to provide sufficient building envelopes so that setbacks can be achieved but those standards are specifically reviewed when building permits are submitted. 3. The roadways meet code and should handle the level of traffic that will be generated by the development. Mitigation fees for traffic will help offset general impacts of traffic on surrounding streets. ''er ' Kennydale Court Preliminary Plat File No.: LUA-04-I09_ PP, ECF January 4, 2005 Page 6 4. Staff's recommendation on limiting the number of curb cuts appears reasonable. There should be sufficient design flexibility to provide homes that fit the requirements to provide safe, efficient streets. Staff will have the final decision on access to the City streets. At this time, there will be no access to Edmonds from any of the proposed lots. Access to the internal streets may be limited by staff as they find reasonable. 5. in exchange for removing a substantial number of trees, staffs tree planting recommendation is appropriate. It enhances the plat, the City's image and reverses the environmental harm of removing mature trees which absorb rainwater and both cool and clean the air. 6. The stormwater detention system is located adjacent to a major arterial. It needs to be screened appropriately for both safety and aesthetic reasons for both the streetscape as well as buffering the adjacent properties. 7. In conclusion, the proposed plat should be approved by the City Council. RECOMMENDATION: The City Council should approve the 29-lot Preliminary Plat subject to the following conditions: The applicant shall comply with the conditions imposed by the ERC. 2. A homeowner's association or maintenance agreement shall be created concurrently with the recording of the final plat in order to establish maintenance responsibilities for all shared improvements of this development. A draft of the document(s) shall be submitted to the City of Renton Development Services Division for review and approval by the City Attorney and Property Services section prior to the recording of the final plat. 3. The applicant shall be required to install a "Private Road" sign with addresses being served from the private drives at the intersections of the private roads and the proposed 42-foot wide internal public street, prior to final plat approval. 4. No direct access from any lot within the plat shall be allowed onto Edmonds Avenue NE. Additionally, to reduce the number of direct access points on the proposed NE 215 Street, Lots 21 and 25 shall gain access from the abutting 26-foot private road. This condition shall be placed on the face of the final plat prior to recording. 5. The applicant shall obtain a demolition permit and complete all inspections and approvals for all buildings located on the property prior to the recording of the final plat. The satisfaction of this requirement is subject to the review and approval of the Development Services Project Manager. 6. The applicant shall be required to have all drainage facility maintenance agreements and easements ready to record prior to final plat approval. 7. The applicant shall be required to install a sight obscuring landscape/fencing buffer along the southern and western sides of the detention facility(Tract A). This condition shall be subject to the review and approval of the Development Services Division prior to final plat approval. 8. The applicant shall be required to plant two new approved trees within the 20-foot front yard setback 441010 area of all lots within the plat. Kennydale Court Preliminary Plat File No.: LUA-04-109, PP, ECF January 4. 2005 Page 7 Nor° ORDERED THIS 4'1' day of January 2005. rkia 4 FRED J. K MAN HEARING XAMIN TRANSMITTED THIS 4thday of January 2005 to the parties of record: Nancy Weil James Jaeger John Sargent LLC 1055 S Grady Wav 9419 S 204°i Place 2016 Edmonds Ave NE Renton, WA 98055 Kent. WA 98031 Renton, WA 98056 Kayren Kittrick Mark Rousso Bruce D. Collins 1055 S Grady Way J & M Land Development, Inc 2032 Edmonds Avenue NE Renton, WA 98055 1328 Aberdeen Avenue NE Renton, WA 98056 Renton, WA 98056 -*otic TRANSMITTED THIS 4''' day ofJanuary 2005 to the following: Mayor Kathy Keolker-Wheeler Stan Engler, Fire Jay Covington, Chief Administrative Officer Larry Meckling, Building Official Julia Medzegian, Council Liaison Planning Commission Larry Warren, City Attorney Transportation Division Gregg Zimmerman, PBPW Administrator Utilities Division Alex Pietsch, Economic Development Neil Watts, Development Services Jennifer Henning, Development Services Janet Conklin, Development Services Stacy Tucker, Development Services King County Journal Pursuant to Title IV, Chapter 8, Section 100Gof the City's Code, request for reconsideration must be filed in writing on or before 5:00 p.m.,January 18,2005. Any aggrieved person feeling that the decision of the Examiner is ambiguous or based on erroneous procedure, errors of law or fact,error in judgment, or the discovery of new evidence which could not be reasonably available at the prior hearing may make a written request for a review by the Examiner within fourteen(14)days from the date of the Examiner's decision. This request shall set forth the specific ambiguities or errors discovered by such appellant, and the Examiner may, after review of the record, take further action as he deems proper. An appeal to the City Council is governed by Title IV, Chapter 8, Section 110, which requires that such appeal be filed with the City Clerk, accompanying a filing fee of$75.00 and meeting other specified requirements. Copies of this ordinance are available for inspection or purchase in the Finance Department, first floor of City Hall. An appeal must be filed in writing on or before 5:00 p.m.,January 18,2005. ''err 411111. Kennydale Court Preliminary Plat File No.: LUA-04-109, PP, ECF January 4, 2005 Page 8 If the Examiner's Recommendation or Decision contains the requirement for Restrictive Covenants,the executed Covenants will be required prior to approval by City Council or final processing of the file. You may contact this office for information on formatting covenants. The Appearance of Fairness Doctrine provides that no ex parte (private one-on-one) communications may occur concerning pending land use decisions. This means that parties to a land use decision may not communicate in private with any decision-maker concerning the proposal. Decision-makers in the land use process include both the Hearing Examiner and members of the City Council. All communications concerning the proposal must be made in public. This public communication permits all interested parties to know the contents of the communication and would allow them to openly rebut the evidence. Any violation of this doctrine would result in the invalidation of the request by the Court. The Doctrine applies not only to the initial public hearing but to all Requests for Reconsideration as well as Appeals to the City Council. A PORTION of the S.E. 1/4, SECTION 4, TOWNSHIP 23 N., RANGE 5 E., W.M. • CI Z u nN 0 W yM �o �1t1� itgz a %m • i 1 �..IZ.jr�� -tlYAmow. t 1~� �� W o. �I /`1y 1i I(q11op 1 ..a.� r•� � ;•� .,.. `•y=l�•.1,•{w`�� III 1 T,",! „i d 411 „ tl LL Y llw I,t1 V ,Ill ly taa r, • w I V • 'V•� L/•Y•/ C w r71 k < O. + 24TH �. ST. t t "-it o ' • �i ltE. 24TH ST. . , )6'1 Q o, a ` -c liltiletill *RA 1" / 7 1 �I is rw• 6:—:22u�r �---.....1.6',-.1 ��.�1 �r. •A . �A iitc,YIiO�•,41 f{V,�I�'t' 1.1 i' 'r/�-}�� tJ � . • t ''',�,;5'•4::?-12,, 5'•4__- t� ~ u ` -,..i.,> `W pWM�{•.111 �/�'i�;Q■`�In! �jl`�'�' 21 51504 N'ir" + 17,6 ' . .... w 71111111 y�p I Q tr u " !Ss`:/'i�i�JVJI�:Y y •'•t'{.� , • . • . r� e o i• ?," r,A h . r ,. N.E.23RD ST.1 ��=°;�. 3>�= Pl. 1 1 ✓o„t ,, m i� r, •) a 1C'�\ir.�� 4� EI' �liou ...1511. 1. 11MIN1 11 j °�•' '+ NE RD ST. P �� ! ••J�II� 1:P11 t ..11 sr,• , �� .* 'a r •..1•% m lc;00 3N�d � 2 «"y , Q. t:. tJ k7 [+Q7(�1 m `•r r H o [�P F! .r. _:., a in .t.: i•; • 1 re, �O.81• IOF• 1 -. -4�.ma II •• ... ,,,Z ( tA,J v..1, 2.. �1' :�, s w Q. t ; V� NL'. 11t 'l J•/r.11 I 1111.• It ' f". t u:•7. •}p:.•t. ei,� _, �u .,,7r� �i I' M , i r,lra. J+ ti�'k Y t'w 234 �� ,/ w a ra W� :�¢, —._. �aa �-} . r :,' ___ Y,1;� () M� "�„ mM _ I. ,r,.�" �, a. .•• ,• • , „ T i1 u.;n rni 1,,�ry•,;;r IIi CON OMOM• ,•. 3' , ” r x, ,- ,i;.___ 4!— 'Lea-` 4 on 4 I I I1CLtSI L'! .. «. ".J�.. t tI w. 1 .. -�� J • (2) �'�`,, o;V.I.tui I„ �. . S .:. 'l m •,�� . ;me .w int r .11 t�, O CI .,moi , wr1 CO 2' ;a .1../."r ...u.. " , �_ ... J 4 0 n ro.. �` •.e{ " , Q!. -.,' ;"-I a fu�,o• •i la �/�i r 1:int, "! ON—SITE AND z. 20TH ST. 1 " .: b '�'`' ' :I,.:',� lilt• . • eill t�E ;y« ��V. SURROUNDING USES x o ":7,c7271 ,"1;‘,.,,,L .! ,' „ ''!1l�RT,:; M I�Rl ' 1 n ei w v ., . ;>� o ARE ALL SINGLE .'v.l.. 1 .x 1.4%... =1=!;I ��^fit 1`,sd 1�sij l :: '0 ?,•►t`" ' � by aE' ..•, V-\P��. FAMILY RESIDENTIAL 2 .� T ,, I !G 1'.1 �, - rel.411:t 0 "•am ital'IVA E 1 c,.4 .5 i +1,i o • �¢.AN. g l til !IN et : , " 11 .0; t. "i i I .,::1TIM� • 't1''•� Iz till 4 y:0-01",p'y14' 7.I Ml• . E3 1 t4 ' la 10 ro...,..- .4 hil tfict , ., •1® 0. ;441, _ 4 1 la nrrl sr, Ir,�11��'`/G�0 tL it . „ $a =. ..Z s , iil f, I 21Is 2 ; P; Il;� �,1��, �` fk1 . ( \t �, t +�:".�. "J�TI foal i"-�E� (1 I 2).3"-T2- jIX] t, .�'�.I � IMI„� 1h '�P �`, i' 1`, ' 8 ~''' 1 }kr �� 7MR flT '(,•a Y. --1 b ,•!,4,''.. L,Z te ..,,— n .{,y V1.111,I 209, IA 1....�L'1CCE I .'u�~yP'44 ''l,', } TRAC, Its S1 ..__,245 't®'' 4i •g. Iv.: ` ".. �� f la If .�•1 L p.,. ,Sti•+1'� i'.s , • • ''� ,� ¢ "••P,i h�w i;''"r.Y j 1 1 ,i� 1i'•rj' p��,l��'yi�i kt !ICrk,, Q , r' "\ ,j e . ..........,..... [E' J” n"f7 t1 uI -,41 1 gill• •• r f �Ir1,�� l�' 'i' KTi,.1`'.1 ;, NOff CTpslpnds t,1 oat: _.nio. •'4j_,:4•--i"--y-s2::..a w „ ,•''V �' I, `'_ y r'i.L, 1°4-{'41.w . '''L t•et. N' °16TH �:£D T ` fC.1[: ,• T0�' • s Zc ¢��}' ,. �p I0�1 ;, r u, i:77-, 1 rryq, i � M • �S .N" '. I fy • Par . • GRAPHIC SCALE OCLc„e., JJJ e a_J 1!Y• ,. . tJ I .,m,• 4 I-12.1,,,- lT I W E%�tNICi'... I '• •�' 6,.. p. •/ • SL i var ,r w onw.or JJJ w n r .(' I OI t�Cf l •,rtt 1 kw.. too K of --L •_ •, ) --) ) A PORTION of the S.E. 1/4, SECTION 4, TOWNSHIP 23 N., RANGE 5 E., W.M. 1 LEGAL DESCRIPTION \ T 4,444. ` ,..r't \"q� NORTH 1.4 W PARCEL NO.042305 9056(south pone!) a ,Y THE NORTH 157.5 FEET Of THE NORTH7051 OUARIER Of THE NORTHWEST \ . '~ P' Y QUARTER OF THE SOU7HwE5T 00ARTER OF SECTION 4,TOWNSHIP 13 NORTH, •SITE '!I ^ ti RANCE 5 EAST.W.w.IN 0INC COUNTY,wASHINGiON: S ExCEPT THE WEST 30 FEET THEREOF FOR ROAD. N,%�//l 4111 n 0 PARCEL NO.042305 9011 (6,6H2 per.) or n I .,l r, \ 1 Z INC WEST HALF OF Int SOUTH HALF OF THE SOUTH HALF OF THE SOUTH N i E u , HALF OF THE 50UTHwEST OUARTER OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER Of SECTION NE 22nd ST. 4.TOWNSHIP 23 NORTH.RANGE 5 EAST,76.74,IN RING COUNTY,WASHINGTON; A .4' Y W y,�E _ EXCEPT THE WEST 30 FEET THEREOF'CONvEYED TO KING COUNTY FOR pO 11612 AVE SE BY DEED RECORDED 090CP RECORDING NO,660129 ' Z£,y 4r- c i NrowO 1 W €-----_-� (Yak b VICINITY MAP L.14., d n 'I 11 i6 MI I 2601 2e09 I 2611 I 2eN 2US 2101 I)Os N.1.$. rq I I I I 2174 W \ ..�. SON T 675 03 •° Q ° SITE DATA � 1 s0o so0 so.o >o.•' 760 A',,', _ � I I � ' / I AREA: 190,695 SF (4.38 ACRES) "----••T- I n \ • ' A I /AI b N tA. 2,12.,0,+ 1 t, sa 1 000 SF '--" v I „�s. I 6 I 8 I II / -I 1 :I� / a2 NET AREA: 158.828 SF (3.85 ACRES) �•`s5 ncc No..n 7020 212.n.[ a uae{C__ _ !,12.74 v soe v •'..A I •7729 ,10 /"'" -I t ,." PROPOSED NO. LOTS: 29 1 _') cm or ACH+oHI .>rr- I TF R 4�' p_ ! ` 2so.siv1 V se v A / I e e v/ ZONING: R8 250. /so.o_ 0 11 60 .o' so o m o' 1 so o / / / / / ! / i ""'-- • 6 j Y !1- _ _ 40.0. I I R PROPOSED DENSITY: 7.95 VNRS/ACRE is ...�'`� - 21 r"s _ .ila— �a 1 ^F; ___ __ / _ / l /lw.�rtl 1`/, It �4!' •EC' PROPOSED USE: R-8 ZONE: SINGLE FAMILY DETACHED RESID. F'IriiIA•., )0[ mak' i.21,..._ I [ '11*_ �/ v •�/ A r.,11 7 • Eo• 321 - G mn — 2.30 902.1 -1'; - --iii -- 100 4 .'h" ..a,' r -az Y '�71L T— /s. ' { / / / / wO.T I I';. J `^�J= ` = a [xR,.R.pA u c „,,,,..,,,,,,/ x:ar Fr2+,' ` r — 0. z --\—-- 7•";, SITE SERVICES r,. I�.�.,o / ` Od�345��D7412. / T(_ ISL, .T'' I` 26 F 25\:,'1"I_ Zv • I / 2 SEWER; CITY OF RENTON o' s0 I.., „ZQ ✓ a, ^ )s..7 Y 8 "v 8 1H 5 rn7 sl\ '19 so l 4- I s t6 I WATER: CITY OF RENTON Q w S2.e sF•-'grIS si07'F%1`/ I II ,-I S $, \ }� / - f ,,a—,i/ SCHOOL. RENTON SCHOOL DISTRICT U In a P. ..71:- i-- -• / C-7.- i .1 g(`.\ / / °/ s 7441 I I 15 TELEPHONE: OI ESTTY E PENTON -I o> \ 600 L e20 :-r- TS-fSK is o' ,0 (1221�el,o; 11119 I ,'...014,`")1I lA •.1 "'7 ELECTRICAL&CAS: PUGET SOUND ENERGY h Ct I {/ ! I P' ) C,,,1 p�32 I I 1 -- CABLE T.V.; COMCAST CABLE�TSION 72= C�xe� \ __s+2. �T.o o' 11 sl o R I ! r2.v I R I 2 I ,, t, - - - (—°"�lJ y� l I� I I W W WNW (° el _PI P 44 / I I g lc to ,1:,,... 74�EErlCBEDIri11 I;sass I� 24 Cf' 23 BI 122 / el I 18 1 0'� • 9 '' v I UJ 1“1",,•:,,/ /.Q^ 14 SITE ADDRESS 2016 EDMONDS AVE. NE (south porceI) d I \ v .ss.v' •sse v / v/ . s1.7 v 'R a I MIS t !y, 2024 k 2032 EOMONDS AVE. NE (north parcel).,-1.� „fr.' , wt I s'0 / J / ' \ ASSESSORS NO 9,456•(south parcel)�' 4Ii -- v I �� / ° S. 42305 — __—__—__� ^-46 ~..,-.,.-. ”' 6J.4 r1 „-• 40242305 2'7 (north a el ,r-� I H89.19 56'R I4.02I I } \ 3 2 trI11C0f L . I I 1 +x°%:'71 IIJ1 II t3 ...%"' ,.«, Z t 2 3 DO 4 5 I 6 F �'0 I ,.,....CIN MAP. PAGEt-AO NE 20th ST. I.. S F\PSI A H.oR., -I w "11_-_:-. W yy HUSE)I I I I TRACTS: -. 'x•,, ?� C ` I TRACT A: DRMIA00-I22$4,Sf W 3 ___—_--,,,,„1— .ORNn I 'w 5U s:, iri.. l_==-�— — 9 as NE1.=u.. ST, NOTE. ALL EXISTING HOUSES AND �� Z 1' IIOC! .- ----____ STRUCTURES ARE TO BE REMOVED. PROPERTY OWNERS: Iti 1M12705-f02t ` �+w/A.^ -, BRUCE D.GOWNS \ b.!'+ 4' 2032 76.EDMONDS AVE.NE w2. -0,L RENTON.WA. 98056 ` �, ,•. LOT AREAS 0!2303-9000 , \ 44 ,S' r (c",,f TOPOGRAPHY ANO BOUNDARY SURVEY Br: loss f-(VOSS LOT ARLO 0011N 1 SARGENT.LLC n� Centre �Se r.0, (457.54)-1.71..HNA of 002 1[SS 44,4 40.wag 2016 EDMONDS AVE.NC ore— RENTON,WA. 98036 GRAPHIC SCALL � 144n.:v.::YON ^�4erWA4�.�I..YA ,10 L.•-.A1 TT. I (1..1 MI-2101 N 10 p.. tiii rointe Surveying [.Fnr) ....-t- t r.n•4. R. 46 • - 411Ir - * _8 ,_ ,---------- - - - ' y---„ .. .. , .. .a,- SE 95th Wat .„-------- . , II MI , R-8 , R C •. IV E 96th S . --------"1 ! 7 _; ,I_______I N; re th igt.F1$ " 98- . - -:- 1 i -- I.--._ i i i ! , • - t 41.4e> - .-:-- ,;,---- a; li RA-t8 'r .• ;-- _ )--- ipp_LP .c.D% . ek- gir . SE 99t ---i.L___ -- -4 t1'1-7-Nr i -- i ,,,,,,-; to_ LZI 1 8 41111111 1.-- LILL- - RC l ! - SE loot - ----::: i i i :_,...., _R (J) - L---- 7 r --- - " •- - : • - . I 1 E 24 ! . . , t-4 i 04 5 F.LA ' j• : , , , ; : i i ‘ '' ., R,,..ja : !_, ,1 L j_,..,...„_,___fr_T,..,,,;Lz_m,_t_8 RC ' - RC • '' .:-',.-, °- : --: 1 • l'arcli tilt 1 i I ; , RI I.e. -pi•\k/ '_, __ ---, - --\ T-'-' d 1 kit 123i-d 1St. -117.1 I tv. . . .. . .. -s.L R-,r43:/ _ /„\ f , ,,- • pl -Fig 16-5C0Mrarig) i ; St. / _ 6:,,/ -th. S.—klb ' 0 ,Z el- ----- -,.m.SS& R-10 „ ---___ E —,1 1 --:8i 1 _----_. „pty•_•- • '..4 z ._LC R-01--- --!--1 1 1 \ ''.,/ ' ! ',.-4-- Z ___1 -. NO 20i C--4- ;___----- e4 , \ _,,. .-- ' / 1 '*4411001 H• ---' ; 1 t-Ca . ,' i / ..,- C;)-- I • R-1 m _ - , 1 lk-b ph 1 , , . --,--, , , , , , . / 7 re._ • ion _ \ , \,- --- V • i t•J ix ,... i‘ -tea . N • • --4a„ i A s- 1 ' : " ' ' < R-10(P) :E.) , ote , 1 !_ i _ cle R-8 i ii iiito , ; 11 -'-iN / 'CS :',\' ' ' i I • 1,isti s, _.1.. ST • 'm _ LLE i i 1 01 --1 ' r i Intl iri7) 11111 I a) ,ff 'R • i i• a 1 1Z3 -1-z-18 0 -0,t% RM- ,- C04,,,, at 0* \ P - 8 • 0 e..,..All....:: ai .i.= \ ' 1 • to ,, . mi. • 4, , , pktio, :ii ET ' ii,' . . ,,g.; riR , Bwi NI C S sii'Adidel-1 • .11. : R 8(P 0 r.,.. ____,... 4 111 I lin ikviii ,-, , •_ Q iNNIIIMI I ° II • -7 ,p. .-.. ri ,,.47 ...— _ .1-. . • ...._, .... ,.... _4 pill' II ) cts 1 \ \ al g ifr,!aim,1 . E. t t 461.1 A i = 01 i ...." 1 R1 7 Aft. . ill 44411111 .----- ---•-<-"-1-a:/. i ' -/ to A - :, _ E5 - 9- TZ3N R5E-W Iil- 1' 2° 4r D5 ZONING te4R)+ P/B/PW TECHNICAL snoncEs 4 rr")2 XT 13 CV 117 1 I, .�rrrr CITY OF RENTON DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE-MITIGATED MITIGATION MEASURES ,, giof APPLICATION NO(S): LUA04-109, PP, ECF PROJECT NAME: Kennydale Court Preliminary Plat APPLICANT: Marc Rousso, J&M Land Development, Inc. LOCATION OF PROPOSAL: 2008, 2016,2024 &2032 Edmonds Avenue NE DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSAL: The applicant is requesting Preliminary Plat and Environmental (SEPA) Review for the 29-lot subdivision of a 4.38-acre site comprised of two parcels. The proposal would create lots for the future development of single-family residences with the proposed density of 7.8 units per net acre. The subject property is currently designated with the Residential— 8 dwelling units per acre(R-8)zone. LEAD AGENCY: The City of Renton Department of Planning/Building/Public Works Development Planning Section MITIGATION MEASURES: 1. a. The applicant shall comply with the recommendations contained within the Geotechnical Report prepared prepared by Earth Consultants Inc. dated August 26,2004 with regard to site preparation and construction. b. Temporary Erosion Control measures shall be installed maintained in accordance with the Departmer - Ecology Standards to the satisfaction of the representative of the Development Services Division for40.0 duration of the project's construction. c. The applicant shall identify the project clearing limits on the project drawings prior to the issuance of the construction permit, and in the field prior to initiating site work. d. The applicant shall limit site disturbance including clearing, grading, utility, and roadwork activities to occur from April 1 sr through October 31st. e. The applicant shall designate staging areas for temporary stockpiles of excavated soil prior to the initiation of project construction. f. The project contractor shall perform daily review and maintenance of all erosion and sedimentation control measures at the site. g. Certification of the proper removal of the erosion control facilities shall be required prior to the recording of the final plat. 2. The applicant shall comply with the 1998 King County Surface Water Design Manual Level 2 for the drainage control plan. 3. The applicant shall pay the applicable Parks Mitigation Fee based on a rate of $530.76 (25 x $530.76 = $13,269) per new single-family lot with credit given for the four existing single-family residences, prior to the recording of the final plat. 4. The applicant shall pay the applicable Traffic Mitigation Fee based on a rate of$75.00 (25 x 9.57 = 239.25 x $75.00 = $17,943.75) per each new additional trip generated by the project with credit given for the four existing single-family residences, prior to the recording of the final plat. 5. The applicant shall pay the applicable Fire Mitigation Fee based on a rate of $488.00 (25 x $488.00 = $12,200.00) per new single-family lot with credit given for the four existing single-family residences, prior the recording of the final plat. `41600 LEGAL DESCRIPTION PARCEL NO. 042305 9056 (south percel) THE NORTH 157.5 FEET OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF SECTION 4, TOWNSHIP 23 NORTH, RANGE 5 EAST, W.M., IN KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON; EXCEPT THE WEST 30 FEET THEREOF FOR ROAD. PARCEL NO. 042305 9021 (north porcei) THE WEST HALF OF THE SOUTH HALF OF THE SOUTH HALF OF THE SOUTH HALF OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF SECTION r. 4, TOWNSHIP 23 NORTH, RANGE 5 EAST, VOA.. IN KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON; EXCEPT THE WEST 30 FEET THEREOF CONVEYED TO KING COUNTY FOR 116th AVE. SE BY DEED RECORDED UNDER RECORDING NO. 665129 -.2) 1 ) A PORTION of the S.E. 1/4, SECTION 4, TOWNSHIP 23 N., RANGE 5 E., W.M. W c o 0 I Z• v°i m 0 v ., 'z 0 ), l.) ...411 I q q)' tit' W. ,..S „ I.. F-- , 0 cit c Z z° '�' C G _ O -(-'-g'y1,1, =� Y` -r _W _ Ir '�r Q�.�.� Q ��p,,• y.,� .. [ e �•,y.( e . �' i� N W at Y c j Y ;CFIt' n ' a I'1Z is, I __i'--' 104 4i'f 4431 (<1 iT -,� " e) C Ib "p r- C (� e° `° 0. il; �I j , YfL W '_Q Iva �� .,.I .,i1 ".fii .1. �;, .. I . t µ• N.E. 24TH ST. + 4 e Q a 24TH ST. '< a ,., I � Lij f31 a -> ti�i 1. f1 ..ii ; »• v v 411 �,9 r. " l� 4 - �t. 21 2 r �1 » J , - E e. ` .'11f •�TTJl7S[Gl ox' ! .... + ._.-. • W— V r ie9N.E.23RD ST.9 O R. + + r I ,�.o"' i. a°..•.Jf`` .l>,2_t.>,'Q w •,‘Q •:i ��n k� ' '�`i INesit " 21 MSC l \ -'D Wim:n m '0S •IJJ.�—mfi 101 2S ` '_ .''[.�, � � C. '0111061,10111'." ..5r ( J I •II 'fJ�:P. ,• �f _ I ` A c Q Qu . .0 ��7� ,fI �` w .� ST-r:., l„ I� + + NE. 3RD ST 4 alt 1-TA! —� e — 2aas .21:),g47--,,,,,. pI-�7 L�_ 1J d '�Q'! �. „ ., Hi�) II illi En. ,PP. 113!4..5''-:is lisiffil-rki . ,_ t... �`� �lt',*wooly�� „Ic1A o`lJ l,�1 .%r 1. IE114: aL�G t4 ;.:i11" ua.'.$ �ero.. . '� ,0 1""vil \ r F ,,,,_� `-ic_. .,, i tA,._±,.....: - 2 0-tl.,iST:,-O-,--[:______ ILr uil4r '�. , x'234 . , 2 'e, • iris` ' t __,,N _ L. ti:h,„1 C.,. CONDomlNiuM� '- f • �� [I .,.-- 3 13. .54. p2: .7at ��,�'>'? ` , ,.,.. ; .ef-. ut" 10.,, Jo 1 o 02 •ctWIgo . —e,__ Im ], �'iW? :�I" pr,i 4u-4 e: E j I 11 a. .' N.E.==2r s_.!„ __',...•. nus[r U C) L a[ tu im... 1!_ -.l3_• 4n,LJ. pl .a 4 t�i {•� •. Ml _ 1-ti o -,..`•:•••',„:j (; Q t`L_.t(8, i` , — S 1 ft .15 11 .� Plebe". Sergent _J.�. Y in Ja cp1_ Q ' a'''.�,0.,\'I V.a_ a�.i G ,'�• .''.IY�I�I • G I,.• 1 r!.< ,+•C5 i Be i.J,'. :ft,411 I,. x. �, ` p -ny.! n.. ''' 0 - -•-.0• _ j _ -,iu- i=�_ _ e M F uu ,11..,. ,,., q..,>N ON—SITE AND z z r. t ,1.1 � 4j� •� i� Paeecce Ser 1 '0 z x 3 P 4 �•' . L 1 4 Sa 'F W [� '°' :a 4 _T I ;+ •,Skov � ._ ',�r>r `.�'�, 3, SURROUNDING USES ,° o t o 7 11 ; i w: Ip` z a�' • ` ;:%" ". 9 ;•b. :Iliii'9 B''i�e j"�• r. �,' CLE r � 3 C m �� N �� ARE ALL SINGLE z .a 20TH., 1,,. l` 51-- ..,r`t W 1, � i �tmawraE � '— �o a 11 . `� �a �► " �E w 6��P �� FAMILY RESIDENTIAL c] " -....1, "--V,'17ti' fix,•', :fes 9101, i `E ;j' ri 'ilk:1 r\'''° E . .. � � Z a. Q ��Pki it �%e,,• N. j� N "7.1 • 1•t&J' W I.o fi t • _. ,I n.E 19TH sr t+ ' " NGS _ .1 :c m3-, 'l`��z,� i ' 1 _• 5t , 7 a e 44 s?9 '�- :�:—" FF 215 �'ryr2s1e�� I.n��} • E: • �//��x,•1�•��1n1Y�k7 M�. 3. v+ - t, , -�• Q y2 - - W, PP ;1 6 I 'a a"1 J� +>!4'tf�'Sf� . v lot' 1' TRAC - jet1 • x`i ",i. uRL? _:ri f 9t1,3 ai• ) " :i 2029 ,I i3,'!r I �1„':v` y r� '; - O O 6 L µE. 3 n n •-`W �•`, ,p 7 W :nE loin 4t\ Ts c a�`, 1 m, E.Z -' 245 �r 41 "fir•:µ{l' . � r� 1.,�i z6411,: SIF t1 tQ' 1� .' ',1'\ + :.: ti R� a."-:� ,., I • ,-- OM •- w •'—VIL W 3ei'( 'Lk--0a.r eft 1• p ' Nott Highlands 04t anlo. 0. --ln. p.� 0 'Y. . •+J-,L ',,I. �' �°Z v',�, I .`w• CT •5 E' 4! Ec. _J,. ., 1❑�f, ti 14iT`�`t=r` xx ►i teasimr,® i.,t1 i e'e.'.l T;£D `r -, ScALE t' . 200• r ® n ,2 13, Q Wll. ,J— :4- I , 4: ? ate'"' Ei- '!f: • `' 16TH - k; .-at a'",.1 .11--_u ui • z I,. Pork s GRAPHIC SCALE _ , . 2 pgyi ; "L�'1 ',fn �. 'S "� n® " Q' `. • \' ,/. - y- a . wo - CAM.er. JJJ Q I n_ e� Q t. it r cnl•",a tir 9• 7 �" If £ • IE s y ® 41' s QST' ,x. SHEET 1 I 4 .� : , \7 • — (M FEET) 1 tven- 200 n. Or 9 CITY OF RENTON COUNCIL AGENDA BILL AI#: g.YI. J Submitting Data: Planning/Building/Public Works For Agenda of: kilo Dept/Div/Board.. Transportation Division February 7, 2005 Staff Contact Ryan Zulauf, x7471 Agenda Status Consent Subject: Public Hearing.. Kaynan, Inc. Lease Addendum 10-05 to Lease Correspondence.. Agreement LAG 003-84 Ordinance Resolution Old Business Exhibits: New Business X Study Sessions Issue Paper Information Lease Addendum 10-05 Recommended Action: Approvals: Refer to Transportation/Aviation Committee Legal Dept X Finance Dept Risk Mgt X Fiscal Impact: Expenditure Required... Transfer/Amendment Amount Budgeted Revenue Generated $25,945.59 Total Project Budget City Share Total Project.. SUMMARY OF ACTION: A lease addendum to the Kaynan, Inc. ground lease is needed to reflect an overall increase in the leased area. Approval of a lease addendum documenting an increase in the leased area is required to complete this modification. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Recommend approval of Lease Addendum 10-05 to the Kaynan, Inc. lease, LAG 003-84, to reflect an overall increase of the leased area of the combined two parcels. H:/FileSys/Air/Projects/Tasks/Agenda Bills/Kaynan Addendum 10-05 Agenda Bill CITY OF RENTON PLANNING/BUILDING/PUBLIC WORKS MEMORANDUM DATE: February 7, 2005 TO: Terri Briere, Council President Members of the Renton City Council VIA: o) Mayor Kathy Keolker-Wheeler FROM: Gregg Zimmerman, Administrator STAFF CONTACT: Ryan Zulauf, x7471 SUBJECT: Kaynan, Inc. Lease Addendum 10-05 to Lease Agreement LAG 003-84 ISSUE: A lease addendum to the Kaynan, Inc. (Kaynan) ground lease is needed to reflect an overall increase in the leased area. Approval of a lease addendum documenting an increase in the leased area is required to complete this modification. RECOMMENDATION: Recommend approval of Lease Addendum 10-05 to the Kaynan, Inc. lease, LAG 003-84, to reflect an overall increase of the leased area of the combined two parcels. BACKGROUND SUMMARY: Kaynan is an Airport tenant with a long-term ground lease with the City to operate an aircraft storage facility at 350 Airport Way. Kaynan's Lease Agreement, LAG 003-84, provides for the lease of two non-adjacent parcels in the southeast corner of the Airport. The two parcels were originally established to be 72,938 square feet. In 1998, the Airport sponsored the SE Taxilane Rehabilitation Project to resurface and re-stripe Taxiway "A" in the southeast corner of the Airport and bordering the north side of Kaynan's southeastern-most leased parcel. The City and Kaynan have re-established the boundary line of the taxilane so that the City is only responsible for maintenance/replacement of the taxilane pavement but not the pavement adjacent to the taxilane and associated with Kaynan's leased area. The City and Kaynan have agreed to extend Kaynan's lease line to the edge of Taxiway"A"to provide ingress/egress to their three T-hangar buildings in the southeastern-most corner of the Airport. The City has re-surveyed the two parcels, which has resulted in an increase of 6,260 February 7, 2005 Page 2 square feet to Kaynan's leased area, and consequently, a proposed annual rent increase of $2,050.00. In addition, the City re-sealed the joints in the concrete pavement in the 6,283 square foot area being turned over to Kaynan, Inc. so that the pavement is in a reasonable condition. H:/FileSys/Air/Projects/Tasks/AgendaBills/Issue Paper,Kaynan Addendum 10-05 LAG 003-84 Addendum#10-05 ADDENDUM TO LEASE AGREEMENT (City of Renton to Kaynan, Inc.) THIS ADDENDUM to Lease Agreement LAG 003-84 is effective as of the date of execution by the City of Renton, as indicated on the last page of this addendum. RECITALS: WHEREAS, Kaynan, Inc. has a lease agreement with the City of Renton, LAG 003-84; and WHEREAS, under lease LAG 003-84, Kaynan, Inc. leases two non-adjacent parcels in the southeast corner of the airport; and WHEREAS, the two parcels were originally established to be 72,938 sq. ft. (19,351 + 53,588 = 72,938 sq. ft.) in LAG003-84; and WHEREAS, the larger of these two parcels, located in the most southeasterly corner of the Airport, contains three T-hangar buildings; and WHEREAS, the boundary of the lease line does not include a portion of the apron area being used by Kaynan, Inc. for ingress/egress to their eastern-most T-hangar building, and as a result Kaynan, Inc. has been using the apron area adjacent to and outside of their leased area without compensation to the City; and WHEREAS, in 1998, the Airport sponsored the SE Taxilane Rehabilitation Project to resurface and restripe Taxiway "A", in the southeast corner of the Airport and bordering the north side of Kaynan's southeastern-most leased parcel; and WHEREAS, the Lessor desires to establish the boundary lines and the terminus of the taxilane that serves the southeast corner of the airport; and WHEREAS, the Lessor and Lessee desire to establish the boundary line and terminus of the taxilane for pavement maintenance/replacement so that the Lessor is only responsible for maintenance/replacement of the taxilane pavement but not the pavement associated with the Lessee's leased area; and WHEREAS, the City desires to extend the northern boundary of Kaynan's southeastern- most leased parcel to meet the south side of the newly re-striped Taxiway "A" to provide ingress/egress to their three T-hangar buildings in the southeastern-most corner of the Airport, +'' and LAG 003-84 Addendum#10-05 WHEREAS, the City resurveyed the two parcels; and WHEREAS, the new survey of the smaller parcel resulted in a new area of 19,328 square feet, and that resulted in a reduction in area of 23 square feet (19,351 - 19,328 =23); and WHEREAS, the new survey of the larger parcel included a portion of the apron area being used by Kaynan, Inc. for ingress/egress to the eastern-most T-hangar building; and WHEREAS, the new survey of the larger parcel resulted in a new area of 59,871 square feet, and that resulted in an increase in area of 6,283 square feet (59,871 - 53,588 = 6,283); and WHEREAS, the combined total leased area of the smaller and larger parcel is now 79,199 square feet (19,328 + 59,871 = 79,199 sq. ft.) as shown in Lease Exhibit A, and WHEREAS, in July 2004, the City re-sealed the joints in the concrete pavement in the 6,283 square foot area being turned over to Kaynan, Inc. so that the pavement was in a reasonable condition. NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY AGREED AND COVENANTED BY AND BETWEEN THE CITY OF RENTON AND KAYNAN CORPORATION,AS FOLLOWS: 444.00 WITNESSETH: 1. Lessor and Lessee do hereby agree to amend Paragraph 1 of Kaynan, Inc.'s lease, LAG 003-84, to reflect the results of the new survey of the smaller parcel and the larger parcel so that the new combined square footage of the two parcels is 79,199 square feet(19,328 + 59,871 = 79,199 square feet) as shown in Lease Exhibit A; and 2. Lessor and Lessee do hereby agree that Lease Exhibit A, Legal Description, attached hereto, is made a part hereof; and 3. Lessor and Lessee do hereby agree to an annual land rent of$25,945.59, based on the existing annual rental rate of$0.3276 (79,199 x $0.3276= $25,945.59) identified in Lease Exhibit A; and 4. All other terms and conditions of the original Lease Agreement and addenda shall remain in full force and effect. LEASE AGREEMENT 003-84 2 City of Renton to Kaynan,Inc. LAG 003-84 Addendum#10-05 'w KAYNAN, INC. CITY OF RENTON a Washington Corporation a Municipal Corporation Mayor Kathy Keolker-Wheeler Bonnie Walton, City Clerk Date Approved as to legal form: Nigro *meLEASE AGREEMENT 003-84 3 City of Renton to Kaynan,Inc. KAYNAN LEASING CORPORATION NE 1/4 SECTION 18, TOWNSHIP 23 NORTH, RANGE 5 EAST, W.M. LEGAL DESCRIPTION CITY OF RENTON, KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON THAT TOWNIP PORTION NORTH,RANG OF THE NORTHEAST EAS'OT�W.M.INR FKINGnCOUNYON , WASHINGTON; BEGINNING AT THE INTERSECTION OF THE CENTERLINE OF SHATTUCK AVENUE NORTH WITH THE CENTERLINE OF AIRPORT WAY NORTH,SAID POINT OF INTERSECTION OF LOGAN AVEUNE AND AIRPORT WAY NORTH; THENCE NO2'29'431 ALONG THE NORTHERLY EXTENSION OF THE CENTERLINE OF SHATTUCK AVENUE NORTH A DISTANCE OF 275.00 0 FEET; THENCE N8T30'17'W,A DISTANCE OF 61.45 FEET; SOq'til THENCE 50720'4319,A DISTANCE OF 25.17 FEET; 5g THENCE S8730.171,A DISTANCE OF 175.81 FEET TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING;THENCE CONTINUING 58720'17'EA DISTANCE OF 124.87 FEET; X-22 1w \ THENCE N0729'43'E,A DISTANCE OF 165.35 FEET; THENCE S8S03'241V,A DISTANCE OF 126.58 FEET; `" 19,328 sq.ft. ., \ THENCE 50729'43*W A DISTANCE OF 144.23 FEET TO THE TRUE TPOB x 0.444 0 res o POINT OF BEGINNING. 1z GAINING 19,328 SQ. FEET OR 0.444 ACRES, MORE OR z i.1 ro TN A-y 175.81 S8T2017'E ..-'A''';‘75.-- TOGETHER WITH: "'' 61.45' S8T30'17 _ 368,67' N84'28'10'E THAT PORTION OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 18, _ - TOWNSHIP 23 NORTH,RANGE 5 EAST,W.M.,AND THAT PORTION OF N8730'1YW LEASE UNE r N • 13.89 HENRY TOBIN DONATION LAND CLAIM No.37 IN SAID SECTION 18, .1 44 -1tVi,$ "� DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: o"' R--,01 _ w - I BEGINNING AT THE INTERSECTION OF THE CENTERUNE OF S8T30'17'E CS 1 SHATTUCK AVENUE NORTH WITH THE CFNTERUNE OF AIRPORT WAY TPOB�" N 122 41' $ NORTH,SAID POINT OF INTERSECTION LYING N8730'17'W.A z ti:'' w I DISTANCE OF 862.23 FEET,FROM THE CENTERLINE INTERSECTION ww o OF LOGAN AVENUE NORTH AND AIRPORT WAY NORTH; �' !M `" a z THENCE NO729'431,ALONG THE NORTHERLY'EXTENSION OF'THE 4- w CENTERLINE OF SHATTUCK AVENUE NORTH A DISTANCE OF 275.00 a4"-.-.� r' 59,871 sq.ft. o - "i o"' .67 FEET: 1.374 acres "' 22 ` Fes' o THENCE S07 9'43^5,A DISTANCE OF 5THENCE S8730'17E,A DISTANCE OF 5.00 FEET TO THE TRUE "' POINT OF BEGINNING; Z., THENCE S8T30'17'E,A DISTANCE OF 122.41 FEET TO NE POINTcrl OF CURVE OF A NON TANGENT CURVE TO THE LEFT,OF WHICH THE _ AIRPORT PROPERTY LINE _ _ N87'30 17'W 325.87I RADIUS POINT UES N13'23'19'W,A RADIAL DISTANCE OF 313.69 _AIRPORT PROPERTY UNE _ FEET; _ _ THENCE EAST ALONG THE ARC,THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 0315'44',A DISTANCE OF 17.86 FEET TO THE POINT OF CURVE ______________ - _ AIRPORT WAY NORTH OF A NON TANGENT CURVE TO THE RIGHT,OF WHICH THE RADIUS 8 862.23'7 ,_ ____ _ _____J POINT UES S1734'04'1.A RADIAL DISTANCE OF 4,478.73 _ - FEET;THENCE EAST ALONG THE ARC,THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 01'18'31',A DISTANCE OF 102.30 FEET; THENCE N18'25'45'W,A DISTANCE OF 25.00 FEET; THENCE N84'28'101,A DISTANCE OF 113.89 FEET; LINE TABLE THENCE S0419'45'E,A DISTANCE OF 18.23 FEET; 4 UNE LENGTH BEARING THENCE S00'4YV,A DISTANCE OF 29.52 FEET; LI 7.49' 50731'O1'W THENCESO1'31 ,A DISTANCEOF 71.56 FEET; THENCE S01'39'40-W,A DISTANCE OF 67.87 FEET TO A POINT OF U 1823' SO4'19'45'E CURVE TO THE RIGHT HAVING A RADIUS OF 43.21 FEET AND A 1_3 29.52' SO0'49'34'W CENTRAL ANGLE OF 26'29'21'; CURVE TABLE THENCE SOUTH ALONG THE ARC A DISTANCE OF 19.98 FEET TO A CURVE LENGTH RADIUS POINT OF COMPOUND CURVE TO THE RIGHT HAVING A RADIUS OF Cl19.98' 43.21' 29.86 FEET AND A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 35'32'38'; 100' 5O 200' THENCE SOUTHWEST ALONG THE ARC,A DISTANCE OF 18.52 FEET; C2 18.52' 29.86' THENCE 50731'01'W,A DISTANCE OF 7.49 FEET; ---_ C3 17.86' 313.69' DISTANCE SCALE IN FEET THENTHENCEN0702'27'E,A DISTANCE OF 145.12 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING. CONTAINING 59,871 SQUARE FEET OR 1.374 ACRES,MORE OR LESS. IT """m °°` "" a.° ""a.' _ naurc ��" LEASE EXHIBIT A T wow, E ai o DUANE HARTMAN & ASSOCIATES, INC. i r -SICTve'joTs- """�" °�' °°` RENTON MUNICIPAL AIRPORT- 9.110. 63,20 16926 1425)us-300-xt5e020 ROAD,0-107 """'® KAYNAN LEASING CORPORATION 50008KIF,NA4W40998 98072 FAX(1251 4W-100ss 650 '�1OM 21508.4 1,,,9 ,.,,, 6.1-490?1 CITY OF RENTON COUNCIL AGENDA BILL AI#: ?.p. Submitting Data: Planning/Building/Public Works For Agenda of: 1/4600, Dept/Div/Board.. Transportation Division February 7, 2005 Staff Contact Ryan Zulauf, x7471 Agenda Status Consent Subject: Public Hearing.. Bosair, LLC Lease Addendum 03-05 to Lease Correspondence.. Agreement LAG 003-86 Ordinance Resolution Old Business Exhibits: New Business X Study Sessions Issue Paper Information Lease Addendum 03-05 Recommended Action: Approvals: Legal Dept X Refer to Transportation/Aviation Committee Finance Dept Risk Mgt X Fiscal Impact: Expenditure Required... Transfer/Amendment kiwi Amount Budgeted Revenue Generated $15,890.29 Total Project Budget City Share Total Project.. SUMMARY OF ACTION: A lease addendum to the Bosair, LLC ground lease is needed to reflect: 1. An increase in the leased area; and 2. A periodic increase in rent using the Consumer Price Index for Urban Seattle. Approval is requested of a lease addendum documenting both an increase in the leased area and an increase in the lease rate. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Recommend approval of Lease Addendum 03-05 to the Bosair, LLC lease, LAG-003-86, to increase the leased area, to allow aircraft access to Bosair's hangar, and provide for an increase in ground rental rate using the Consumer Price Index for Urban Seattle. H:/FileSys/Air/Projects/Tasks/Agenda Bills/Bosair Addendum 03-05 Agenda Bill • CITY OF RENTON PLANNING/BUILDING/PUBLIC WORKS MEMORANDUM DATE: February 7, 2005 TO: Terri Briere, Council President Members of the Renton City Council VIA: ;'Mayor Kathy Keolker-Wheeler Sc.(� FROM: Gregg Zimmerman, Administrator STAFF CONTACT: Ryan Zulauf, x7471 SUBJECT: Bosair, LLC Lease Addendum 03-05 to Lease Agreement LAG 003-86 ISSUE: A lease addendum to the Bosair, LLC ground lease is needed to reflect: 1. An increase in the leased area; and 2. A periodic increase in rent using the Consumer Price Index for Urban Seattle. Approval is requested of a lease addendum documenting both an increase in the leased area and an increase in the lease rate. RECOMMENDATION: Recommend approval of Lease Addendum 03-05 to the Bosair, LLC (Bosair) lease, LAG-003- 86, to increase the leased area to allow aircraft access to Bosair's hangar, and provide for an increase in ground rental rate using the Consumer Price Index for Urban Seattle. 'fir February 7, 2005 Page 2 BACKGROUND SUMMARY: Bosair, LLC is an airport tenant with a long-term ground lease with the City to operate a maintenance facility at 289 E. Perimeter Road. Bosair's Lease Agreement, LAG 003-86, provides for a periodic adjustment of the ground lease rate using the Consumer Price Index for Urban Seattle. Bosair's lease rate will be increased from $0.27 to $0.31 per square foot per year. Bosair has been using the apron area adjacent to the front of their hangar building, and outside of their leased area to park their aircraft, without compensation to the City. Bosair agreed to an increase in their leased area to include the apron area along the front of their building. As a result, Bosair's leased area will be increased by 21,510 square feet. Both of these changes will result in an annual rent increase of$4,724.00. H/File Sys/Air/Projects/Tasks/Agenda Bills/Issue Paper,Bosair Addendum 03-05 LAG 003-86 Addendum#03-05 ADDENDUM TO LEASE AGREEMENT (City of Renton to Bosair, LLC) THIS ADDENDUM to Lease Agreement LAG 003-86 is effective as of the date of execution by the City of Renton, as indicated on the last page of this addendum. RECITALS: WHEREAS, lease LAG-003-86 was assigned to Bosair, LLC, hereinafter Bosair, in March 2001, by John, Julie and Terrance Lien; and WHEREAS, Bosair's leased area was 29,749 square feet; and WHEREAS, Bosair's leased area was subject to flooding and the City of Renton participated in the Cedar River Floodwall and Levy Project, which was completed on January 14, 2000; and WHEREAS, upon completion of the floodwall project Bosair's annual lease rate was increased from $0.26 to $0.27 per square foot, as agreed to in Paragraph 2 of Addendum 02-98 to lease LAG-003-86; and WHEREAS, the land rental rate for the approximately 29,749 square feet of land area was determined to be $0.27 per square foot per year and continued until June 1, 2000; and WHEREAS, on June 1, 2000, and for the ensuing five (5)year period, the land rental rate was adjusted, using the Consumer Price Index-Urban, to a rate of$0.31 per square foot per year, resulting in an annual rental amount of$9,222.19 (29,749 x $0.31 = $9,222.19), and continuing until July 31, 2005; and WHEREAS, the lease line boundary of LAG 003-86, follows the west side of Bosair's existing building and does not allow for ingress/egress to the building; and LEASE AGREEMENT 003-86 City of Renton to Bosair,LLC yrrrr LAG 003-86 Addendum#03-05 ,41100 WHEREAS,Bosair has been using the apron area adjacent to the west side of the building and outside of the leased area, for ingress/egress without compensation to the City;and WHEREAS, the City desires to establish the boundary lines and the terminus of the taxilane that serves the southeast corner of the airport; and WHEREAS, the City and Bosair desire to establish the boundary line for pavement maintenance/replacement so that the City is only responsible for maintenance/replacement of the taxilane pavement; and WHEREAS, the City desires to increase Bosair's leased area to provide for ingress/egress to the building, increasing Bosair's leased area by 21,510 square feet; and WHEREAS, the taxilane at the southeast corner of the airport was established as a public use taxilane. NOW,THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY AGREED AND COVENANTED BY AND BETWEEN THE CITY OF RENTON AND BOSAIR, LLC, AS FOLLOWS: WITNESSETH: 1. Lessor and Lessee do hereby agree to amend Paragraph 1 a. of Bosair's lease, LAG- 003-86, to add to its leased premises 21,510 square feet, for a total leased area of 51,259 square feet (29,749 + 21,510= 51,259), identified in Exhibit A; and 2. Lessor and Lessee do hereby agree that Exhibit A, Legal Description, attached hereto, is made a part hereof; and 3. Lessor and Lessee do further agree that the difference between the CPI-U of June 1, 1995 to June 1, 2000 is 14.9% (176.0-153.3=22.70/153.3=0.149 or 14.9%). This results in an annual rate increase from $0.27 to $0.31 per square foot(0.27 x 1.149 = $0.31); and 4. Lessor and Lessee do hereby agree to an annual land rent of$15,890.29 for the 51,259 square feet (51,259 x $0.31 = $15,890.29) identified in Exhibit A; and 5. Lessor and Lessee do hereby agree that the annual land rent rate in Paragraph 4 shall remain in effective until June 1, 2005, and effective as of that date the rental rate shall automatically be readjusted by and between the parties using the increase of the Consumer Price Index, and for each five (5)year period thereafter. Minimum LEASE AGREEMENT 003-86 2 City of Renton to Bosair,LLC LAG 003-86 Addendum#03-05 Sloe base rental for any extended period shall not be less than the current annual rent of $15,890.29; and 6. Lessor and Lessee do hereby further agree that the Consumer Price Index information to be used for rental adjustments shall be the Consumer Price Index- Urban (CPI-U) then in effect for all urban consumers, as published by the US Department of Labor for the Seattle-Tacoma Metropolitan Area; and 7. Lessor and Lessee do hereby further agree that at least thirty (30) days prior to the Rental Adjustment Date either party shall, if they desire to adjust the base land rental rate for the ensuing five (5) year period by a means other than the Consumer Price Index-Urban, provide to the other party a written request for readjustment of the rental rate pursuant to RCW 14.08.120(5); and 8. All other terms and conditions of the original Lease Agreement shall remain in full force and effect. BOSAIR, LLC CITY OF RENTON a Washington Corporation a Municipal Corporation Mayor Kathy Keolker-Wheeler Bonnie Walton, City Clerk Title Date Approved as to legal form: LEASE AGREEMENT 003-86 3 City of Renton to Bosair,LLC NE 1/4 SECTION 18, TOWNSHIP 23 NORTH, RANGE 5 EAST, W.M. CITY OF RENTON, KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON L_r-- 1J ❑ ACE AVIATION n O RE RT LEGAL DESCRIP11ON E 4Li1 LINE TABLE LEA z LINE LENGTH BEARING THAT PORTION OF THE N\1. ORTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 18, Li 16.17 N49'S9'37"E TOWNSHIP 23 NORTH,RANGE 5 EAST,WILLAMETTE MERIDIAN, IN KING COUNTY,WASHINGTON,DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: `7 L2 12.68 S16'40.54"E z 1111111111111111 L3 21.01 $06'3446"E COMMENCING AT THE INTERSECTION OF RAINIER AVENUE NORTH AND AIRPORT WAY NORTH; C L4 25.00 S18'05�22"E THENCE S8730'17"E A DISTANCE OF 744.03 FEET TO A POINT _ _ L5 29.44 S58'S4 07"E LOCATED ON THE CENTERLINE OF AIRPORT WAY NORTH; N84'S3'10"� �SS4' C 1 L6 16.C1 $!)2 18'10 W THENCE N04'49'43'W A DISTANCE OF 294.74 FEET TO A POINT 548.68' gJ1� �, _ LOCATED ON THE RENTON AIRPORT RUNWAY CENTERLINE REFERRED \. !8597 ..._ ___ - TO AS STATION 0+00, CURVE TABLE THENCE N04'49'431Y,A DISTANCE OF 170.00 FEET; 350.00' ---�._„__ THENCE N85'10'17"E,A DISTANCE OF 350.00 FEET; a° CURVE LENGTH RADIUS THENCE N84'S3'10'E,A DISTANCE OF 548.68 FEET; [7 '" TPOB s Cl 54.10 35.00 THENCE s5 MO9 E A DISTANCE OF 83.63 FEET TO THE TRUE �, POINT OF BEGINNING; ,,,7;13, THENCE N49'59'37"E,A DISTANCE OF 16.17 FEET TO A POINT ?�� OF CURVE TO THE RIGHT HAVING A RADIUS OF 35,00 FEET AND A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 88'34'06"; X-22 -' THENCE EAST ALONG THE ARC A DISTANCE OF 54.10 FEET; \)1( 4,56„9°46, LEASE LINE THENCE S41'26'17"E,A DISTANCE OF 232.37 FEET; _ S,°. THENCE S29'16'00"E,A DISTANCE OF 53.58 FEET; G/ �Il' 51,259 sq.ft. 'r2� THENCE S76'40'54"E,A DISTANCE OF 12.68 FEET; N,�•s`?<1• 1.176 acres tea, THENCE SO6'3A'46"E,A DISTANCE OF 21,01 FEET; �S� THENCE S84'28't0-71,A DISTANCE OF 113.89 FEET; RUNWAY STATION 0+00 J `+ ,. THENCE N18'05'221'1.A DISTANCE OF 25.00 FEET TO THE POINT OF CURVE OF A NON TANGENT CURVE TO THE LEFT,OF WHICH THE ,:'a c RADIUS POINT UES S18'15'34'E,A RADIAL DISTANCE OF o ,8, Oj.4?' p u 4,528.73 FEET; 8. j 113.89 THENCE WEST ALONG THE ARC,THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF \ R,452 5842810 25- Ls \„,--,', 01'18'31",A DISTANCE OF 103.44 FEET;THENCE N58'54'07"W, - A DISTANCE OF 29.44 FEET;THENCE N31'05'531,A DISTANCE Taxi lar' OF 69.43 FEET; THENCE N58'15'03"W, A DISTANCE OF 62.42 FEET; 1 THENCE N58'53'08'W,A DISTANCE OF 90.46 FEET; P THENCE NO218'10"E,A DISTANCE OF 16.01 FEET; 100 �0 0 01 200' o THENCE N4758'46"E,A DISTANCE OF 133.56 FELT TO THE TRUE Ce POINT OF BEGINNING. a 59,122 sq.ft. o SCALE IN FEET 1.357 acres � CONTAINING 51,259 Sp.Fi. OR 1.176 ACRES MORE OR LESS I - - -{----____(// AIRPORTLINE '-"---- N873�0'17y AIRPORT WAY NORTH 862.23' •- --------_ l If M.O. Mt .„ MOM n n.wnm MX ACCEPTABIUTr "Wwias °LvKa'""` SHIM usr '" DUANE HARTMAN & ASSOCIATES, INC. .m�°31• anal LEASE EXHIBIT�} Pr �: -Surveyors- P.N.n art w. ewe 1ni a RENTON MUNICIPAL AIRPORT w«o. 03 60 18928IncsaMiE-RmOON5 crow.a-128 (425)483-6355 "�"' 1305A1 R LL C. 0M17.101.4101.W000ll17.101.4101.98072 LAX 14251 45}4650 *OD Map1 W 59wCipw oxc 43-Ie0-14.q ( (16,,,, CITY OF RENTON COUNCIL AGENDA BILL AI#: $.p. Submitting Data: Planning/Building/Public Works For Agenda of: kikso Dept/Div/Board.. Transportation Division February 7, 2005 Staff Contact Ryan Zulauf, x7471 Agenda Status Consent Subject: Public Hearing.. Bruce Leven Lease Addendum 07-05 to Lease Correspondence.. Agreement LAG 001-88 Ordinance Resolution Old Business Exhibits: New Business X Study Sessions Issue Paper Information Lease Addendum 07-05 Recommended Action: Approvals: Legal Dept X Refer to Transportation/Aviation Committee Finance Dept Risk Management X Fiscal Impact: Expenditure Required... Transfer/Amendment Amount Budgeted Revenue Generated $33,810.65 Total Project Budget City Share Total Project.. SUMMARY OF ACTION: A lease addendum to the Bruce Leven ground lease is needed to reflect a reduction in leased square footage. A levy was built along the Cedar River as part of the 1999 Floodwall and Levy Project. The levy was constructed along the east side of one of the two parcels that Bruce Leven leases on the Airport, reducing the usable square footage of the parcel. Approval is requested for a lease addendum documenting this reduction in leased square footage. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Recommend approval of Lease Addendum 07-05 to Bruce Leven's lease, LAG 001-88, to decrease the leased area. Approval is requested to credit Bruce Leven's account for approximately $2,173.17 for the difference in rental amount from 1999 to present. Word-H:/AIR/Project/Tasks/Agenda Bills/Leven Addendum 07-05 agenda bill CITY OF RENTON PLANNING/BUILDING/PUBLIC WORKS MEMORANDUM DATE: February 7, 2005 TO: Terri Briere, Council President Members of the Renton City Council VIA: 1,isrmayor Kathy Keolker-Wheeler *f � � FROM: Gregg ZimmermaiA4ministrator STAFF CONTACT: Ryan Zulauf, x7471 SUBJECT: Bruce Leven Lease Addendum 07-05 to Lease Agreement LAG 001-88 ISSUE: A lease addendum to the Bruce Leven ground lease is needed to reflect a reduction in leased Now square footage. A levy was built along the Cedar River as part of the 1999 Floodwall and Levy Project. The levy was constructed along the east side of one of the two parcels that Bruce Leven leases on the Airport, reducing the usable square footage of the parcel. Approval is requested for a lease addendum documenting this reduction in leased square footage. RECOMMENDATION: Recommend approval of Lease Addendum 07-05 to Bruce Leven's lease, LAG 001-88, to decrease the leased area. Approval is requested to credit Bruce Leven's account for approximately $2,173.17 for the difference in rental amount from 1999 to present. BACKGROUND SUMMARY: Bruce Leven is an airport tenant with a long-term ground lease with the City to operate aircraft storage facilities and outdoor aircraft tiedown and float storage at 250 West Perimeter Road. Bruce Leven leases two separate parcels; one on the east side of the Airport, and one on the southwest side of the Airport. In 1999, the construction of a levy during the Cedar River Floodwall and Levy Project reduced the usable area of Bruce Leven's leased parcel on the east side of the Airport. The parcel was reduced by 2,578 square feet, resulting in a reduction of annual land rent in the amount of$415.06. The reduction in square footage of Bruce Leven's parcel was effective on September 1, 1999, and a one-time credit is requested Now to be applied to Bruce Leven's account to reflect the reduction in the amount of approximately $2,173.17. ,arnrr�rr► February 7, 2005 Page 2 Bruce Leven's leased parcel located on the southwest side of the Airport was reduced in square footage to allow for the relocation of security fencing and the installation of an automated vehicle security gate during the 2002 Airport Airside/Landside Separation Improvement Project. The parcel was reduced by 934 square feet, resulting in a reduction of annual land rent in the amount of$300.75. The reduction in square footage will be effective as of the date of execution of the lease addendum. The reduction in square footage of Bruce Leven's two leased parcels will result in a total annual revenue reduction of$715.81, and a one-time credit to Bruce Leven in the amount of $2,173.17. Word-H:/AIR/Projects/Tasks/Agenda Bills/Leven Addendum 07-05 Issue Paper err✓ LAG 001-88 Addendum#07-05 ADDENDUM TO LEASE AGREEMENT (City of Renton to Bruce J. Leven) THIS ADDENDUM to Lease Agreement LAG 001-88 is effective as of the date of execution by the City of Renton, as indicated on the last page of this addendum. RECITALS: WHEREAS, Bruce Leven has a Lease Agreement with the City of Renton, LAG-001-88, and WHEREAS, Bruce Leven leases two non-adjacent parcels under lease agreement LAG- 001-88, and WHEREAS, one parcel is located on the east side of the Airport and is referred to as Bruce Leven's East Side Tiedown Area, and WHEREAS, a second parcel is located in the southwest corner of the Airport and is referred to as Bruce Leven's West Side Office Property, and WHEREAS, Bruce Leven's East Side Tiedown Area was subject to flooding and the City of Renton participated in the Cedar River Floodwall and Levy Project, which began on September 1, 1999, and WHEREAS, a levy was installed as part of that project, replacing the then-existing East Perimeter Road, and WHEREAS, the result of the project was to have the East Perimeter Road relocated to the top of the levy, and WHEREAS, the creation of the levy, raising the elevation of the East Perimeter Road, reduced the usable area of Bruce Leven's East Side Tiedown Area, and WHEREAS, Bruce Leven desires to reduce the leased square footage of the East Side Tiedown Area from 70,716 square feet to 68,138 square feet, and WHEREAS, post-September 11, 2001, security measures required that the City of Renton replace the fencing in certain areas around the Airport, and WHEREAS, one of the areas identified for improvement was the fencing and manual ,,, gate bordering Bruce Leven's West Side Office Property, and LAG 001-88 Addendum#07-05 WHEREAS, the fencing was relocated and the then-existing manual gate was relocated and replaced with an electric gate causing a 934 square foot grassy area to be unusable by Bruce Leven, and WHEREAS, the City of Renton desires to reclaim that 934 square foot grassy area, which is also within the Object Free Area of the Airport, and reduce the square footage of Bruce Leven's West Side Office Property from 71,867 square feet to 70,933 square feet; and WHEREAS, Leven's rental rate on September 1, 1999, was $0.14, and it changed to $0.161 on June 1, 2000; and WHEREAS, these adjustments will result in a credit to Leven for nine (9) months at the rate of$0.14 per square foot per year(9/1/99 through 5/31/00) and fifty-five (55)months at the rate of$0.161 per square foot per year(6/1/00 through 12/31/04). NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY AGREED AND COVENANTED BY AND BETWEEN THE CITY OF RENTON AND BRUCE J. LEVEN, AS FOLLOWS: WITNESSETH: 1. Lessor and Lessee do hereby agree to amend Paragraph 1 a. of Bruce Leven's lease, LAG 001-88, to decrease its portion of the leased premises referred to as Bruce Leven's East Side Tiedown Area by 2,578 square feet for a total East Side Tiedown Area of 68,138 square feet (70,716—2,578= 68,138), identified in Exhibit "A-2"; and 2. Lessor and Lessee do hereby agree to an annual land rent of$10,970.22 (68,138 x $0.161 = $10,970.22) for the 68,138 square feet of unimproved land referred to as Bruce Leven's East Side Tiedown Area identified in Exhibit"A-2"; and 3. Lessor and Lessee do hereby agree that the payment of rent of the decreased square footage of Bruce Leven's East Side Tiedown Area will be retroactive to September 1, 1999, the start date of the Cedar River Floodwall and Levy Project; and 4. Lessor and Lessee do hereby agree that the reduction in the square footage for Bruce Leven's East Side Tiedown Area, effective September 1, 1999, results in a credit from the City of Renton to Bruce Leven in the amount of approximately $9,521.36. Calculated as 70,716— 68,138= 2,578 sq.ft. x 0.14 (rate from 9/1/99 to 5/31/00)/12= $30.08 x 9= $270.72 and 2,578 sq.ft. x .161(rate effective 6/1/00)/12= $34.59 x 55= $1,902.45, fora total of$2,173.17 ($270.72+$1,902.45= $2,173.17); and LEASE AGREEMENT 001-88 2 Nrid City of Renton to Bruce J.Leven LAG 001-88 Addendum#07-05 Nifty' 5. Lessor and Lessee do hereby agree to amend Paragraph la. of Bruce Leven's lease, LAG 001-88, to decrease its portion of the leased premises referred to as Bruce Leven's West Side Office Property by 934 square feet for a total West Side Office Property of 70,933 square feet (71,867—934 = 70,933), identified in Exhibit "A-1"; and 6. Lessor and Lessee do hereby agree to an annual rent of$22,840.43 (70,933 x 0.322= $22,840.43) for the 70,933 square feet of improved land referred to as Bruce Leven's West Side Office Property identified in Exhibit "A-1"; and 7. Lessor and Lessee do hereby agree that the payment of rent of the decreased square footage of Bruce Leven's West Side Office Property is effective as of the date of execution of this lease addendum; and 8. Lessor and Lessee do hereby that Exhibit "A-2", Legal Description of Bruce Leven's East Side Tiedown Area, and Exhibit "A-1", Legal Description of Bruce Leven's West Side Office Property, attached hereto, are made a part hereof; and 9. All other terms and conditions of the original Lease Agreement shall remain in full force and effect. BRUCE J. LEVEN CITY OF RENTON a Municipal Corporation Mayor Kathy Keolker-Wheeler Title Bonnie Walton, City Clerk . LEASE AGREEMENT 001-88 3 Nam City of Renton to Bruce J.Leven LAG 001-88 Addendum#07-05 ,1100 Date Approved as to legal form: LEASE AGREEMENT 001-88 4 City of Renton to Bruce J.Leven NE 1/4 SECTION 18, TOWN HfP 23 NORTH, RANGE 5 EAST, W.M. ( CITY OF RENTO! IG COUNTY, WASHINGTON (, I 100' imp? 100' 2 0' y 1 ' MICE LEVEV-REV/SED SCALE IN FEETLEASED A " lGLEGAL AREA Z 1HAT PROTIQY a-THE NCRTTEAST WARIER CF SECrtcw ld TOWNSHIP 23 NORMRANGE 5 EAST, WAN.DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS' r-�a i \A C IA/ENCING AT A POINT 10 FELL NORTHERLY Cr THE 1 INTERSECTION 0'THE WEST ATARGIN 0'LAKE AVENLE SOUTH S85'I0'17'W� �� I (FORMERLY LAKE Si/eV)WITH ITE CENTERLINE CF AIRPORT WAY 1 — N85'10'15 E __ 375.00` S(FORMERLY DIXIE AIME ACCORDING TO 1)E PLAT OF RFNTCW REAL ESTATE FIRST ADDITION,AS READ IN MUNE 21,PAGE ' } 1 50 RECORDS Cr KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON); \\1\-11111111 I z THENCE S87'30`I7E A DISTANCE 0`•286.31 FEET TO ITS wa INIEKStCTIOY WITH THE SCTgWEl3Y EXTFNSICW Cr THE File CENTERLINE Cr THE EXISTICW RUNWAY CF THE CITN Cr RENTON 1 v �, w AIRPORT; N . �'4 BENCE ALONG SAID RUNWAY CENTERLINE NO4'49'431W,A �=..., DISTANCE CF 294.74 ftt! TO A POINT RFE18RF0 TO AS RUNWAY STATION OFOQ _ l THENCE COMAE ALONG SAID CENTERLINE;A DISTANCE OF 1500E 2/027 FEET, H85' THENCE 5:85'l0'171Y,A DISTANCE Cr 375.00 FEET TO THE TREE 'c 86.34' m. POINT Cr OEG/!W!!NG "T12tJNWAY STATION –�X 9�Jsg. �0,,.>o ,'o TWICE'SO4'48'5I E,AA DISTANCE Cr 176.26 FELT; \ ac 1.63 acro N`A l THENCE N85'I5'00E A DISTANCE Cr 86.34 FEET;b.>� S82'4555'W THENCE 329'4924E CF A DISTANCE 8292 FEET; $,;�y43" X 29.60' THENCE S8255W CF '45 ' A DISTANCE 29.60 FEET TO THE POINT u• l OF CLIVE Cr A NOV TANGENT CURVE ro THE LEFT,CF WHICH THE c� 1 RADIUS POINT LIES N55'0823E A RADIAL DISTANCE OF 5.30.19 ei/ o `'m, i FEET; THENCE'SOUTHEAST ALONG THE AR ThROCKH sf. N89143!'W �� +le ( Cl`'1/'48:76',A DISTANCE Cr 109.29 A CFlVIRN.ANGLE :118I71aEay84791 + 1IE7NCE N89 2431'W,A DISTANCE CF 21598 FEET TO A POINT CX' CURVE TO THE RICHT HAVING A RADIUS CI`"118.81 HtEI AND A CENTRAL A CI.E CF 53'50'I7. THENCE NCR THWEST ALONG THE ARC A DISTANCE a-111.64 Fttl; THENCE N40'06'57'W,A DISTANCE op 47.48 FEET,' N(8'ORf ,NINE THENCE"N05'04b3'W,A DISTANCE OF 224.40 FEET; 1THENCEN85'!0'15E A DISTANCE CF 178.49 FEET TO 71E'TRUE NORTH AIRPORT WAY l POINT A BEGINNING 58730'l7E CONTAINING 70,933 SQUARE FEET QR 1.628 ACRES NOPE CR LESS 286.3/' ---1PO1Nr or COANNELVQIENT • = �rl�� r MUNE ITARTMAN & ASSOCIATES,. INC. LEASE EXHIBIT •-� ��` �� ql:.-- —SUrve op, Ow MI —rr� 1111111111•111111111111111M"s eV RENTON MUNICIPAL AIRPORT ..,o off NB rr�� I�I_ 16928 M OpMY F—P�W 4 ROMA B-10] zsT 03-5155 BRUCE LEVEN-ADDENDUM 08-02 -. If WMpIM4LE'G14iMCAtt1 Ya072 FAX It251 1E3-g:/J .. c.AJ l Ht,451 1/4 UI-StC:I JUN /, !UWNSHIJ-'2 i NOW H, HANCib 5 CAS 1, W.M. KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON t \II\ \ ...0. RENTON MUNICIPAL AIRPORT EAST SIDE AIR PARK TIE DOWN LEASE AREA I THAT PORTION OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 7, TOWNSHIP 23 NORTH, N85'10'17" RANGE 5 EAST, W.M. DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: N85°10'17"E___ -- '; TPS 16'75' 350.00' COMMENCING AT A POINT 10 FEET NORTHERLY OF THE INTERSECTION OF THE WEST MARGIN OF LAKE AVENUE SOUTH(FORMERLY LAKE STREET) WITH THE I `N CENTERLINE OF AIRPORT WAY S. (FORMERLY DIXIE AVENUE ACCORDING TO THE PLAT OF RENTON REAL ESTATE FIRST ADDITION AS RECORDED IN VOLUME 21, PAGE 50 Z .7-.\,;,, RECORDS OF KING COUNTY, WASINGTON); ,V I I THENCE SOUTH 87'50'I7"EAST ON A LINE 70 1-Let NORTH OF AND PARALLEL ' 0 o� TO THE CENTERLINE OF AIRPORT WAY SOUTH A DISTANCE OF 286.31 FEET TO ITS o• 1A m %$ INTERSECTION WITH THE SOUTHERLY EXTENSION OF THE CENTERLINE OF THE clTIE I I ZI EAST SIDE AIR PARK 9` EXISTING RUNWAY OF THE CITY OF RENTON AIRPORT; DOWN LEASE AREA THENCE ALONG SAID RUNWAY CENTERLINE NORTH 04'49'43" WEST A DISTANCE 2 u 68 138 sq ft. OF 294.74 FEET TO A POINT REFERRED TO AS RUNWAY STATION 0+00; �` /.564 acres y THENCE NORTH 04'49'43" WEST A DISTANCE OF 2644.00 hum -"''CL:- ` ! THENCE NORTH 85'/0'/7"EAST A DISTANCE OF 350.00 httl TO THE TRUE POINT #b OF BEGINNING; \z, z \\ u "_ ' THENCE CONTINUE NORTH 85.10'17"EAST A DISTANCE OF 169.75 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 13'55'07"EAST A DISTANCE OF 175.00 FEET; -< \I THENCE SOUTH O2'58'O2'EAST A DISTANCE OF 100.01 FEET; " THENCE SOUTH 13'55'07"EAST 85.00 FEET; 2 THENCE SOUTH 85'12'02" WEST 207.58 FEET;; A A'\ THENCE NORTH 04'49'43" WEST 356.59 FEET TO THE TRUE POINT OF "� BEGINNING. m CONTAINING 68,138 SQUARE FEET OR 1.564 ACRES MORE OR LESS. 1 {v/ 207.58' !/ _� 585.12'02"W /� � N 1 100' 50' 0 1110' 200' SCALE IN FEET - 0 00 RUNWAY STATION z 0 ,V I4 P. b +IA 1i 1 . _ S87.50'I rE _ j 286.31' my ,0..011 R Mt.. OM, ,. KKK . .na. Gm, '`CCUT"HOJTM 11 M .Ifl azxs'� LEASE EXHIBIT /9_ DUANE HARTMAN & ASSOCIATES, INC. Mel" 9w 7-7' am �• -surveyors-- O""' ' KM MK EAST SIDE AIR PARK . . wu x D it-a 0 ROAD. m es,a, U,zsl, sns TIE DOWN LEASE AREA NOOCCIM.I.MAQWlGION 90172 DAC(4Q71 40-K50 Mo.. 10IN911 63-D4/N fi CITY OF RENTON COUNCIL AGENDA BILL AI#: g.% ilibe Submitting Data: Planning/Building/Public Works For Agenda of:p Dept/Div/Board.. Transportation Systems February 7,2005 Staff Contact Nathan Jones, ext. 7217 Agenda Status Consent X Subject: Public Hearing.. Correspondence.. 2005-2006 FlexPass Contract Ordinance Resolution X Old Business Exhibits: New Business Issue Paper Study Sessions Contract Information Resolution Recommended Action: Approvals: Legal Dept X Council Concur Finance Dept Other Fiscal Impact: Account 103.000000.016.5950.0092.73.000031 Expenditure Required... $21,450 Transfer/Amendment kiiie Amount Budgeted $25,000 Revenue Generated Total Project Budget $21,450 City Share Total Project.. $25,000 SUMMARY OF ACTION: This contract with King County Metro, Sound Transit, and Pierce Transit will continue Renton's participation in all elements of the FlexPass Program for 2005-2006. FlexPass consolidates all Commute Trip Reduction CTR)related expenditures by including Commuter Bonus Plus (CB+) vouchers and Guaranteed Ride Home as an integral part of the FlexPass Program. FlexPass is a program offered by King County Metro to all CTR-affected employers. Included in the 2005-2006 FlexPass Program are: 1. Unlimited rides by regular City of Renton employees on bus and commuter rail services provided by King County Metro, Sound Transit, and Pierce Transit. 2. CB+vouchers used to promote the CTR Program by providing incentives to walkers, bicyclists, and carpoolers. 3. Guaranteed Ride Home Program that provides participants in the CTR Program a no charge taxi ride home in the event of an emergency. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: 1. Authorize the Mayor and City Clerk to enter into the 2005-2006 FlexPass Contract with King County Metro to continue implementation of the FlexPass Program. 2. Present the resolution regarding this matter for reading and adoption. H:Trans/admin/agenda2005/Flespassagenda bill ..- osAY o� PLANNING/BUILDING/PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT MEMORANDUM DATE: February 7, 2005 TO: Terri Briere, Council President Members of the Renton City Council VIA: )Mayor Kathy Keolker-Wheeler 4,0 FROM: Gregg Zimmermhfi, dministrator STAFF CONTACT: Nathan A. Jones, extension 7217 SUBJECT: 2005-2006 FlexPass Contract r ISSUE: The 2004-2005 FlexPasses issued to City of Renton employees will be expiring at the end of February. A new contract with King County Metro needs to be authorized for 2005-2006 FlexPass purchases. RECOMMENDATION: • Authorize the Mayor and City Clerk to enter into the 2005-2006 FlexPass Contract with King County Metro to continue implementation of the FlexPass Program. • The resolution regarding this matter be presented for reading and adoption. BACKGROUND SUMMARY: In order to reduce congestion and improve air quality, Washington State passed a Commute Trip Reduction (CTR) Law in the early 1990s. The CTR Law requires employers with 100 or more employees arriving between the hours of six and nine in the morning to have transportation programs for their employees that encourage the use of alternatives to single- occupancy-vehicles (SOVs). 2005-2006 FlexPass Contract Issue Paper February 7, 2005 Page 2 Under the CTR Law, the City of Renton is a CTR-affected employer, and as such, the City of Renton enters into an agreement with King County Metro to purchase from King County Metro a FlexPass for each permanent, full-time, and regular City of Renton employee. The City of Renton provides these passes to eligible employees at no charge. The current cost to the City of Renton per pass is $65.00. This is the same fee charged per pass as the prior year. (Note: if employees were to purchase equivalent transit passes directly from King County Metro, the passes would cost the employees $144.00 per month or $1,728 per year). This is an ongoing program that is paid for out of the 103 funds. AGREEMENT FOR SALE OF FLEXPASSES BETWEEN KING COUNTY,SOUND TRANSIT, PIERCE TRANSIT AND THE CITY OF RENTON This Agreement(hereinafter,"Agreement")is made and entered into by and between King County(hereinafter individually, "KING COUNTY"), Sound Transit(hereinafter"SOUND TRANSIT"'),Pierce Transit(hereinafter +tIfiiie, PIERCE TRANSIT"),or collectively referred to hereinafter as"TRANSPORTATION PARTIES",and the City of Renton(hereinafter, "COMPANY"). RECITALS A. COMPANY and TRANSPORTATION PARTIES share the desire to provide a comprehensive transportation pass program that will reduce single occupant vehicle(SOV)commute trips and improve the mobility of COMPANY employees. B. KING COUNTY,SOUND TRANSIT and PIERCE TRANSIT are authorized to provide public transportation and generally promote alternatives to SOV commuting in King County,Pierce County and Snohomish County. C. COMPANY has a desire to provide incentives and benefits to its employees,which promote non-SOV commuting to its worksite. D. COMPANY and TRANSPORTATION PARTIES desire to create a single pass media that can be used to access a variety of services and benefits,which enable COMPANY employees to commute,by non-SOV modes. AGREEMENT NOW,THEREFORE, in consideration of the terms,conditions and covenants herein contained,the sufficiency of which is hereby acknowledged,the parties hereto agree to the following. 1. PURPOSE 1.1 Purpose This Agreement establishes a cooperative arrangement between TRANSPORTATION PARTIES and COMPANY for sale and distribution of FlexPasses to COMPANY's Eligible Employees at the rate set forth herein. 2. DEFINITIONS 2.1 Eligible Employees Eligible Employees shall mean only those employees of the COMPANY who meet the following criteria: ice, CTR-affected City of Renton employees. 2.2 . FlexPass Card A FlexPass Card is a pass of predetermined duration,usually twelve(12)months,that allows each Eligible Employee,as defined in Paragraph 2.1,to choose from a variety of non-SOV commute options provided by COMPANY or TRANSPORTATION PARTIES. Each FlexPass Card shall bear the inscriptions"FlexPass",each TRANSPORTATION PARTIES'logo or an agreed to regional logo,and beginning and expiration dates in a design and color scheme mutually agreed upon by TRANSPORTATION PARTIES. FlexPass Cards shall also bear a fare amount on the face of the card,the amount of which shall be agreed upon by TRANSPORTATION PARTIES prior to the start of this Agreement. FlexPass Cards shall be produced by TRANSPORTATION PARTIES or their designated contractor. COMPANY shall pay the amount specified in Attachment A for production of FlexPass Cards. FlexPass Card's are non-refundable by TRANSPORTATION PARTIES,except as set forth in Paragraph 8.2.Eligible Employees may be asked to present a valid COMPANY identification card when using a FlexPass. 2.3 Trip Revenue In the event of a generally applicable fare increase adopted by KING COUNTY,SOUND TRANSIT or PIERCE TRANSIT,the amounts shown in Attachment A may be increased at such time as a generally applicable fare increase is implemented by KING COUNTY,SOUND TRANSIT or PIERCE TRANSIT,and COMPANY shall be required to pay the amount of such increase to the appropriate TRANSPORTATION PARTY. 3. EMPLOYEE CONTRIBUTIONS AND COMMUTE BENEFITS AND INCENTIVES 3.1 Eligible Employee Contributions COMPANY may require Eligible Employees to contribute toward the cost of a FlexPass Card,in the amount specified in Attachment A. COMPANY shall not require Eligible Employees to contribute more than fifty percent (50%)of the cost of an individual FlexPass Card,as set forth in Attachment A. FlexPass Agreement Page 1 of 10 City of Renton March,2005—February,2006 4. COMPANY RESPONSIBILITIES 4.1 Eligible Recipients Of A FlexPass Card COMPANY shall ensure that only Eligible Employees,as defined in Paragraph 2.1,receive FlexPass cards. 4.2 Ordering FlexPass Cards COMPANY shall provide to TRANSPORTATION PARTIES'representative,as listed in Section 16,the number of „vied FlexPass Cards that COMPANY shall provide to Eligible Employees. The number of FlexPass Cards shall be listed in Attachment A. COMPANY shall allow TRANSPORTATION PARTIES at least four(4)weeks in advance of the cards'effective date to fulfill the request for FlexPass Cards. COMPANY understands that failure to provide the number of FlexPass Cards desired at least four(4)weeks in advance,may incur additional and extraordinary costs. Such costs may be related to,but are not limited to,overtime staffing,additional manufacturing charges and express delivery charges. These additional and extraordinary charges shall be borne solely by COMPANY. 4.3 Ordering Additional FlexPass Cards COMPANY shall retain the right to purchase additional FlexPass Cards for distribution to Eligible Employees,over and above the number specified in Attachment A,during the term of this Agreement. COMPANY shall allow TRANSPORTATION PARTIES at least four(4)weeks to fulfill the request for additional FlexPass Cards. Requests shall be made to the TRANSPORTATION PARTIES'representative,as listed in Section 16. The cost for a single additional FlexPass Card shall be the Monthly Rate For Additional FlexPass Cards specified in Attachment A,times the number of months remaining in the Agreement. 4.4 Receipt And Security Of FlexPass Cards COMPANY agrees that all FlexPass Cards received from TRANSPORTATION PARTIES shall become the sole financial responsibility of COMPANY upon receipt and signature by an employee,official or agent of COMPANY. COMPANY agrees that it is solely responsible for providing proper storage and security measures for any and all FlexPass Cards received by COMPANY while in the custody of COMPANY. COMPANY shall be held liable for the equivalent value of a combination King County/Sound Transit/Pierce Transit fare for each month remaining in this Agreement for each FlexPass Card that COMPANY cannot account for,either by distribution to an Eligible Employee,storage in a secure area,for each FlexPass Card not collected from an Eligible Employee who terminates their employment with COMPANY or otherwise becomes ineligible to receive and use a FlexPass Card under the terms of this Agreement,or for each FlexPass Card COMPANY cannot return to TRANSPORTATION PARTIES upon termination of this Agreement,as specified in Section 8. 4.5 Reporting COMPANY shall immediately report to each of the TRANSPORTATION PARTIES any FlexPass Cards that are lost,stolen,damaged or otherwise not functioning properly in TRANSPORTATION PARTIES'transit coaches' electronic registering fareboxes. COMPANY shall return any and all FlexPass Cards to TRANSPORTATION PARTIES that COMPANY believes to be defective. COMPANY shall report to TRANSPORTATION PARTIES all FlexPass usage,changes to COMPANY's transportation program or other details as necessary. 4.6 Roster Of FlexPass Card Recipients COMPANY shall maintain a roster of Eligible Employees who have been provided a FlexPass Card by COMPANY. Upon demand,COMPANY shall provide each TRANSPORTATION PARTY a copy of the roster. 4.7 FlexPass Employee Use Agreement Form Each Eligible Employee who receives a FlexPass Card from COMPANY shall be required to read,sign and return to their employee transportation coordinator or department supervisor,an agreement form stipulating the uses and conditions of a FlexPass Card. The Employee Use Agreement Form,as set forth in Attachment B,is deemed mutually acceptable to both COMPANY and TRANSPORTATION PARTIES. Use Agreement Forms shall be kept on file by COMPANY for the term of this Agreement. 4.8 Collection of FlexPass Cards COMPANY shall return to TRANSPORTATION PARTIES all FlexPass Cards issued to COMPANY within five (5)days of the effective date of termination of this Agreement. COMPANY shall be held liable for the equivalent retail value of a combination King County/Sound Transit/Pierce Transit fare for each month remaining in this Agreement for each FlexPass Card not returned to TRANSPORTATION PARTIES upon termination of this Agreement. FlexPass Agreement Page 2 of 10 City of Renton March,2005—February,2006 4.9 Collection of Transit Ridership Data COMPANY shall survey,or otherwise collect from COMPANY's Eligible Employees,any and all necessary daily transit ridership and commute data that TRANSPORTATION PARTIES deem necessary to accurately and fairly estimate Trip Revenue and the number of bus trips taken by Eligible Employees. TRANSPORTATION PARTIES shall provide to COMPANY a mutually agreed upon survey instrument or other suitable means in which to collect the most current and accurate ridership and commute data possible. 4.10 FlexPass Program Evaluation COMPANY shall participate in any TRANSPORTATION PARTIES' evaluation of the FlexPass program,should such an evaluation be deemed necessary by any of the TRANSPORTATION PARTIES. Evaluation may be through such means as employee surveys,employee focus groups,and management interviews. TRANSPORTATION PARTIES shall provide COMPANY at least thirty(30)days advance notice prior to beginning such an evaluation. 4.11 Home Free Guarantee COMPANY shall fulfill all conditions and responsibilities of the Home Free Guarantee program in accordance with the terms attached hereto and made part hereof as Attachment C. 4.12 Vanpool Services The amount of the vanpool fare subsidy for each Eligible Employee shall be stated in Attachment A. If actual vanpool fares incurred by an Eligible Employee exceed the amount of the subsidy specified in Attachment A,the Eligible Employee shall pay the difference directly to the vanpool bookkeeper. 5. TRANSPORTATION PARTIES RESPONSIBILITIES 5.1 Transit Access TRANSPORTATION PARTIES shall allow each COMPANY Eligible Employee displaying a valid FlexPass Card to ride on all parts of its regular route transportation system without additional charge,for trips up to the value printed on the card. TRANSPORTATION PARTIES shall honor each FlexPass Card issued under this agreement up to the expiration date on the Card or until this agreement is otherwise terminated. TRANSPORTATION PARTIES reserve the right to request additional payment at the time the transit trip is taken,if the cost of a trip on any TRANSPORTATION PARTY's regular transit service exceeds the fare value printed on the FlexPass Card. FlexPass Cards are not valid on any Husky,Mariners,Fourth of July,Tacoma Dome Station event parking,or other special event service at the sole discretion of TRANSPORTATION PARTIES. 5.2 FlexPass Card Administration TRANSPORTATION PARTIES'Designated Representative shall manage production,ordering,replacement and delivery of FlexPass Cards to COMPANY,and other administrative tasks related to the FlexPass Card under this Agreement,other than those responsibilities stated as COMPANY responsibilities in Section 4. 5.3 Replacement FlexPass Cards TRANSPORTATION PARTIES shall replace,at no additional cost to COMPANY,any FlexPass Cards deemed to be defective or otherwise unusable or inoperative. COMPANY may be issued temporary passes until TRANSPORTATION PARTIES can manufacture and deliver replacement FlexPass Cards. TRANSPORTATION PARTIES shall replace a lost or stolen FlexPass Card only once at a charge of$50 per replacement card. 5.4 Confiscation of FlexPass Cards In addition to any other rights under law,TRANSPORTATION PARTIES reserve the right to cancel and confiscate a FlexPass Card which is used out of date,altered,duplicated,counterfeited,transferred or distributed to unauthorized persons or otherwise invalid under the terms of this Agreement. 5.5 Collection Of Transit Ridership Data TRANSPORTATION PARTIES shall provide to COMPANY,at no additional cost to COMPANY,a mutually agreed upon survey instrument or other suitable means in which to collect and measure the most current and accurate transit ridership and commute data of COMPANY's Eligible Employees. In addition,TRANSPORTATION PARTIES shall pay for all costs incurred in processing this survey instrument,but not costs incurred by COMPANY in distributing to and collecting from Eligible Employees,this survey instrument. TRANSPORTATION PARTIES shall make available to COMPANY,all data collected from COMPANY's Eligible Employees. NOW FlexPass Agreement Page 3 of 10 City of Renton March,2005—February,2006 Auk 5.6 Home Free Guarantee KING COUNTY shall fulfill all conditions and responsibilities of the Home Free Guarantee program in accordance with the terms attached hereto and made part hereof as Attachment C. 5.7 Vanpool Services KING COUNTY shall allow each Eligible Employee holding a FlexPass Card to register as a vanpool participant subject to the availability of vanpool vehicles and minimum ridership requirements.The FlexPass Card will be honored as full or partial payment of vanpool fares,up to the amount specified in Attachment A. 6. PAYMENTS AND BILLING 6.1 Payment For This Agreement COMPANY agrees to pay TRANSPORTATION PARTIES the total amount stated in Attachment A for participation in TRANSPORTATION PARTIES'FlexPass program. KING COUNTY and PIERCE TRANSIT shall present an invoice for amounts due to COMPANY's representative listed in Section 16. Payment shall be made in full by COMPANY according to the terms listed on the invoice,unless a payment schedule is mutually agreed upon by both parties and incorporated into this Agreement,in Attachment A. KING COUNTY shall invoice COMPANY for the amount(s)due for SOUND TRANSIT for additional FlexPass Cards purchased by COMPANY. 6.2 Late Payment Penalty If any scheduled payments are not made by their due date,then the entire amount due under this Agreement may become immediately due and payable. Any late payment shall be subject to a penalty accruing at the maximum rate allowable by state law for each month that the payment remains due. If any check made payable to any of the TRANSPORTATION PARTIES by COMPANY is returned to a TRANSPORTATION PARTY for insufficient funds(NSF)in COMPANY's checking account,then COMPANY shall be assessed a$25(twenty-five)penalty by the TRANSPORTATION PARTY receiving the NSF check. 7. TERM OF AGREEMENT 7.1 Term This Agreement shall take effect upon the exact day and expire on the exact day specified in this paragraph,unless terminated in accordance with the terms set forth in Section 8. This Agreement shall take effect at 12:00 a.m.on March 1,2005 and shall expire at 11:59 p.m.on February 28,2006. NIS 8. TERMINATION 8.1 Termination For Cause Any party may terminate this Agreement in the event the other fails to perform its obligations as described in this Agreement by providing written notice not less than fourteen(14)days prior to the effective date of termination. 8.2 Termination For Convenience Any party may also terminate this Agreement for convenience and without cause by providing the other party with written notice not less than sixty(60)days in advance. If COMPANY has made payments in advance,COMPANY shall be entitled to reimbursement from each TRANSPORTATION PARTY for each valid FlexPass Card returned to TRANSPORTATION PARTIES. Such reimbursement shall be at the monthly rate set forth in Attachment A for the full months remaining in the term of the Agreement. If COMPANY has accrued additional financial obligations to any TRANSPORTATION PARTY as a result of the provisions of this Agreement,either prior to termination or as a result of termination,COMPANY agrees to pay any outstanding amount due to the TRANSPORTATION PARTY. The TRANSPORTATION PARTY shall invoice COMPANY for the amount due according to the procedures outlined in Section 6. 9. RECORDS 9.1 Rights Of Review Both COMPANY and TRANSPORTATION PARTIES shall retain the right to review records and documents related to this Agreement. If a records review is commenced more than sixty(60)days after the termination of the contract,the TRANSPORTATION PARTY requesting the review shall give ten(10)days notice to COMPANY of the date on which the records review will begin. FlexPass Agreement Page 4 of 10 City of Renton March,2005—February,2006 10. SUCCESSORS AND ASSIGNS 10.1 Written Approval This Agreement and all terms,provisions,conditions and covenants hereof shall be binding upon the parties hereto and their respective successors and assigns. All parties,however,agree that they will not assign or delegate the duties to be performed under this Agreement without prior,written approval from the other parties. erre 11. LEGAL RELATIONS 11.1 No Partnership And No Third Party Beneficiaries COMPANY and TRANSPORTATION PARTIES agree that this Agreement does not create a partnership or joint venture relationship between the parties,and does not benefit or create any rights in a third party. 11.2 Force Majeure TRANSPORTATION PARTIES shall be excused from performance of any responsibilities and obligations under this Agreement,and shall not be liable for damages due to failure to perform,resulting directly or indirectly from causes and circumstances beyond their control,including but not limited to late delivery or nonperformance by vendors of materials or supplies, incidences of fire,flood,snow,earthquake or other acts of nature,accidents,riots, insurrection,terrorism,acts of war,order of any court or civil authority,and strikes or other labor actions. 11.3 Costs of Legal Action COMPANY shall be liable for any and all reasonable attorney fees,court costs and other expenses incurred by TRANSPORTATION PARTIES in the event TRANSPORTATION PARTIES pursue legal action to obtain the return of any FlexPass Cards or amount owing under this Agreement. 12. APPLICABLE LAW,FORUM 12.1 Terms This Agreement shall be governed by and construed according to the laws of the State of Washington. Nothing in this Agreement shall be construed as altering or diminishing the rights or responsibilities of the parties as granted or imposed by state law. In the event that any litigation may be filed between the parties regarding this Agreement, COMPANY and TRANSPORTATION PARTIES agree that personal jurisdiction and venue shall rest in the Superior Court of the county where the TRANSPORTATION PARTY pursuing the action resides. 13. DISPUTES 13.1 Dispute Resolution Procedure All claims or disputes arising out of or relating to this Agreement shall be referred to a panel consisting of COMPANY's City Attorney,KING COUNTY's General Manager,Transit Division, SOUND TRANSIT's Executive Director,PIERCE TRANSIT's Chief Executive Officer or their designees. If this panel is unable to reach a mutually acceptable resolution,it shall appoint another person to serve as mediator in the effort to resolve the claim or dispute. Such mediation shall be required before an action may be filed to adjudicate the claim or dispute in a court of law. 14. ENTIRE AGREEMENT AND AMENDMENT 14.1 Entire Agreement This Agreement constitutes the entire agreement between the parties and supersedes all prior negotiations, representations and agreements between the parties relating to the subject matter hereof. 14.2 Amendments And Modifications This Agreement may be amended or modified only by written instrument signed by the parties hereto. 15. SAVINGS 15.1 Defmition Should any provision of this Agreement be deemed invalid or inconsistent with any federal,state or local law or regulation,the remaining provisions shall continue in full force and effect. All parties agree to immediately attempt to renegotiate such provision that is invalidated or superseded by such laws or regulations. 4Irro FlexPass Agreement Page 5 of 10 City of Renton March,2005—February,2006 16. CONTACT PERSONS 16.1 Definition COMPANY and TRANSPORTATION PARTIES shall designate a contact person for purposes of sending inquiries and notices regarding the execution and fulfillment of this Agreement,as well as ordering of all fare media and vouchers. COMPANY KING COUNTY, FLEXPASS CARD ORDERS& RETURNS Contact Name Nathan A.Jones Jerry Waugh Title Transportation Planner Customer Services Coordinator Address City of Renton Employer/Retail Products Transportation Systems Division King County Metro Transit 1055 S.Grady Way,5th Floor 201 S.Jackson Street;MS KSC-TR-0412 Renton,WA 98055 Seattle,WA 98104-3856 Telephone 425-430-7217 206-684-6778 Fax 425-430-7376 206-263-4809 E-Mail njones@ci.renton.wa.us jerry.waugh@metrokc.gov PIERCE TRANSIT Contact Name Christie Parker Daphne Tackett Title Fare Integration Project Coordinator Community Services Manager Address Sound Transit Pierce Transit 401 S. Jackson Street PO Box 99070 Seattle,WA 98104-2826 Tacoma,WA 98499-0070 Telephone 206-398-5405 253-581-8037 Fax 206-398-5215 253-984-8227 E-Mail parkerc@soundtransit.org dtackett@piercetransit.org 17. EXECUTION OF AGREEMENT 17.1 Defmition This Agreement shall be executed in four(4)counterparts,each one of which shall be regarded for all purposes as one original. In Witness Whereof,the parties have executed this Agreement as of the date first written above. Company KING COUNTY BY BY Kathy Keolker-Wheeler Darwin Campbell Title: Mayor,City of Renton Title: Manager,Transit—Customer Services Date: Date: PIERCE TRANSIT SOUND TRANSIT BY BY King County per Agent Agreement Daphne Tackett Title Community Services Manager Date FlexPass Agreement Page 6 of 10 City of Renton March,2005—February,2006 FlexPass Agreement Attachment A -Agreement Costs Company City of Renton Start Date March 1,2005 ,, , Area FlexPass zone Renton, Kent, Tukwila Agreement Year #7 Quantity Rate($/card) Cost King County • Transit access 330 $45.00 $14,850.00 • Home Free Guarantee (Up to 8 rides/employee/agreement) • Up to $65 per month per vanpooler • Up to $20 per month for Vanshare • FlexPass Card administration • Commuter Bonus Plus voucher pool. 1 pool $4,950.00 Included (330 FlexPass cards x $15.00) Total Kin! Coun 330 $45.00 $14,850.00 s ' ' "r, h' s,. d'`kr • • 1? R r^`^.xi �� 717)1r, , < � . .� - ' ��a� '�' «a': °� '�:� �?t�,;; �"�:'! �s�z'�+. �� X��'n� Sound Transit 330 $20.00 $6,600.00 • Transit access Pierce Transit 330 Included Included • Local transit sus access Total — FlexPass Agreement 330 $65.00 $21,450.00 Number of FlexPass Cards issued under this Agreement = 330 Payment Schedule = 1/4 due in each of 60, 90, 180 and 270 days. Eligible Employee Contribution ($ per employee) = $0.00 Monthly Rate For ONE Additional FlexPass Card = $4.17 (Note: Calculation based on$50.00/12 months. The Monthly rate does not include Commuter Bonus Plus vouchers.) Allocation: King County =$2.50 Sound Transit =$1.67 Stow FlexPass Agreement Page 7 of 10 City of Renton March,2005—February,2006 FlexPass Agreement—Attachment B Sample Employee Use Agreement Form CITY OF RENTON FlexPass Use Agreement As a FlexPass holder, I agree to the following: 1. The FlexPass is a benefit provided to me as an employee and is to be used only during the period I am employed by my employer. 2. I will use my FlexPass for my own transportation only. I will not transfer my FlexPass to any other person. 3. I will keep my FlexPass secure and in good condition. I will immediately report a lost, stolen or damaged FlexPass to the Transportation Coordinator. I understand a lost FlexPass will be replaced only once per year at a charge of$50.00. A non-working FlexPass will be replaced free of charge. 4. I will return my FlexPass upon request or when I leave my employment with this company. If I do not return my FlexPass,I authorize the amount of$144.00,for each whole and partial month remaining on the FlexPass,to be withheld from my paycheck. 5. I understand that the FlexPass card is valid for up to $65 per month on King County Metro vanpools only. I am responsible for the balance of the vanpool fare each month,payable to the vanpool bookkeeper, which is in excess of the $65 amount. I acknowledge the receipt of my FlexPass,and understand and agree to the terms stated above on using the FlexPass. .04100 Employee's Signature Date Employee's Printed Name FlexPass Serial# Employee's Department or Section Transportation Coordinator Use Only-FlexPass returned: Employee's Signature Date FlexPass Serial# FlexPass Agreement Page 8 of 10 City of Renton March,2005—February,2006 • FlexPass Agreement Attachment C — Home Free Guarantee Home Free Guarantee(hereinafter,"HFG")is a KING COUNTY program that guarantees payment for taxi fares incurred by Eligible Employees who meet the eligible criteria,as set forth below,and taken in accordance with the terms set forth below. C.1 DEFINITIONS C.1.1 Approved Commute Modes Eligible Employees must have commuted from their principal residence or Park&Ride to the COMPANY's worksite by one of the following modes: Bus,carpool,vanpool,walk-on or bicycle-on ferry,bicycle,or walk. C.1.2 Eligible Reasons For Using HFG The following are the only eligible reasons for using HFG: a. Eligible Employee's or family member's unexpected illness or emergency. b. Unexpected schedule change such that the normal commute mode is not available for the return commute to the starting place of their commute. Unexpected means the employee learns of the schedule change that day. c. Missing the employee's normal return commute to the starting place of their commute for reasons,other than weather or acts of nature which are beyond the employee's control,and of which they had no prior knowledge. For example,the employee's carpool driver left work or worked late unexpectedly. C.1.3 Non-Eligible Reasons For Using HFG Reasons which are not eligible for HFG use include,but are not limited to,the following: a. Pre-scheduled medical or other appointments. b. To transport individuals who have incurred injury or illness related to their occupation. An HFG ride should NEVER be used where an ambulance is appropriate,nor should an HFG ride replace COMPANY's legal responsibility under workers'compensation laws and regulations. c. Other situations where,in the opinion of the COMPANY's Program Coordinator,alternate transportation could have been arranged ahead of time. C.1.4 Eligible Destinations For An HFG Ride a. From the COMPANY's worksite to the Eligible Employee's principal place of residence. b. From the COMPANY's worksite to the Eligible Employee's personal vehicle,e.g. vehicle located at a Park &Ride lot. c. From the COMPANY's worksite to the Eligible Employee's usual commute ferry terminal on the east side of Puget Sound. C.1.5 Intermediate Stops Intermediate stops are permitted only if they are of an emergency nature and are requested in advance by the Eligible Employee and are authorized in advance of the HFG ride by the COMPANY's Program Coordinator(i.e.pick up a necessary prescription at a pharmacy;pick up a sick child at school). C.2 COMPANY RESPONSIBILITIES C.2.1 HFG Program Payment COMPANY's payment for HFG services is accounted for in the base price of the FlexPass Agreement,as indicated in Attachment A. C.2.2 Program Coordinator COMPANY shall designate as many Program Coordinators as necessary to administer and perform the necessary HFG program tasks as set forth in this Attachment. C.2.3 Number Of HFG Rides Per Eligible Employee COMPANY shall ensure that each Eligible Employee does not exceed eight(8)HFG rides per twelve(12)month period. FlexPass Agreement Page 9 of 10 City of Renton March,2005—February,2006 FlexPass Agreement Attachment C - Home Free Guarantee (continued) C.3 HFG Program Tasks C.3.1 Process To access HFG rides,Eligible Employees shall contact the Program Coordinator. The Program Coordinator shall call directly an answering service provider,contracted for by KING COUNTY. The phone number shall be supplied Nkkid to COMPANY by KING COUNTY. COMPANY agrees to make information about how to access HFG rides available to all Eligible Employees. Program Coordinator shall obtain the following information from the Eligible Employee,and provide the information to the answering service provider: a. Verify the Eligible Employee has commuted to the worksite by an eligible mode. b. Verify the Eligible Employee has an eligible reason and eligible destination for an HFG ride. c. Ensure the Eligible Employee has valid identification to show the taxi driver. d. Once an Eligible Employee takes the emergency taxi ride,obtain from the Eligible Employee a receipt of the taxi trip. e. COMPANY's Program Coordinator shall forward copies of such receipts to KING COUNTY at the end of each month for record keeping and accounting purposes. f. The answering service provider will arrange taxi rides for the Eligible Employee. C.4 KING COUNTY RESPONSIBILITIES C.4.1 Participating Taxi COMPANY(s) COMPANY agrees that neither KING COUNTY or answering service provider is responsible for providing transportation services under the HFG program. COMPANY further agrees that KING COUNTY makes no guarantee or warranty as to the availability,quality or reliability of taxi service,and that the KING COUNTY's sole obligation under the program is to make payment of the taxi provider for trips actually taken in accordance with the terms of this Agreement. COMPANY agrees it shall make no claims of any kind or bring any suits of any kind against the KING COUNTY for damages or injuries of any kind arising out of or in any way related to the HFG program. Without limiting the foregoing and by way of example only,the COMPANY agrees that KING COUNTY shall not be liable for any injuries or damages caused by negligence or intentional acts occurring before,during or after a taxi ride or for any injuries or damages caused by failure of a taxi to provide a ride due to negligence, intentional acts or causes beyond the taxi's control,including but not limited to incidence of fire,flood,snow, earthquake or other acts of nature,riots,insurrection,accident,order of any court or civil authority,and strikes or other labor actions. '41.110047 C.4.2 Payment Of Authorized HFG Taxi Fares KING COUNTY shall pay the metered fare amount of a COMPANY's Program Coordinator-authorized HFG ride, as defined in the DEFINITIONS section above,for a one-way distance of up to sixty(60)miles. COMPANY or Eligible Employee taking the HFG ride shall pay any fare for a one-way distance in excess of sixty(60)miles. KING COUNTY shall not pay any taxi driver gratuity. Taxi driver gratuity will be at the sole discretion of COMPANY or the Eligible Employee taking the HFG ride. C.4.3 Reporting KING COUNTY shall keep a complete record of all authorized HFG ride requests on a semi-annual basis and provide a copy of this record to the designated COMPANY's Contact Person. C.4.4 Program Abuse KING COUNTY reserves the right to investigate and recover costs from the COMPANY of intentional abuse of the HFG program by Eligible Employees. Program abuse is defined as,but not limited to,taking trips for inappropriate reasons,unauthorized destinations and intermediate stops,and pre-scheduled appointments not defined in the DEFINITIONS section above. NIS FlexPass Agreement Page 10 of 10 City of Renton March,2005—February,2006 CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE CTTY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON, AUTHORIZING THE MAYOR AND CITY CLERK TO ENTER INTO AN INTERLOCAL COOPERATIVE AGREEMENT WITH KING COUNTY, SOUND TRANSIT, AND PIERCE TRANSIT FOR THE SALE OF FLEXPASSES TO CITY OF RENTON EMPLOYEES BY KING COUNTY. WHEREAS, the City of Renton, King County, Pierce Transit, and Sound Transit (Transportation Parties) share the desire to provide a transportation management program that will reduce single-occupant vehicle travel and improve the mobility of employees to the City's worksites; and WHEREAS, the Transportation Parties provide buses, vanpools and the Home Free Guarantee program; and Now WHEREAS, the Transportation Parties, through those programs, are authorized to promote alternatives to single occupant vehicle commuting in King County; and WHEREAS, the City wishes to provide incentives to its employees which promote non- single-occupant vehicle commuting to its worksites; and WHEREAS, the City and the Transportation Parties desire to utilize FlexPasses which can be used to access a variety of services and benefits which enable the City's employees to commute by non-single occupant vehicles; and WHEREAS, it is necessary to document the terms and conditions under which such program will be provided by the County to the City; NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON,DO RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS: 4hre 1 RESOLUTION NO. SECTION L The above findings are true and correct in all respects. SECTION II. The Mayor and City Clerk are hereby authorized to enter into an interlocal cooperative agreement for the sale of passes between King County, Sound Transit, Pierce Transit, and the City of Renton for FlexPasses, vanpool fare incentive, and the Home Free Guarantee program, and all subsequent agreements that do not materially change the terms of the agreement and are without budget parameters. PASSED BY THE CITY COUNCIL this day of , 2005. Bonnie I. Walton, City Clerk APPROVED BY THE MAYOR this day of , 2005, Kathy Keolker-Wheeler,Mayor Approved as to form: Lawrence J. Warren, City Attorney RES.1090:1/21/05:ma 2 ley,th,Z5 Le1144/1111 From: Citizens to Council Via Clerk To: John and Stacy Tribble Nay Date: Wed, Feb 2, 2005 10:49 AM Subject: Re: R-1 Zone Community Separators Dear Mr. & Mrs. Tribble: Thank you for your email to the Renton City Council. This subject is currently being considered by the Planning and Development Committee of Council. Copy will be distributed to all Councilmembers for review and consideration. Sincerely, Bonnie Walton City Clerk City of Renton 425-430-6502 >>>"John and Stacy Tribble" <jstribble©comcast.net> 1/30/2005 4:55:49 PM >>> To whom it may concern, We live in the Stonegate community and are concerned about our area's growth. We would like to voice our support for R-1 Zone Community Separators including: . 50% contiguous mapped open space. . Reforestation of that open space. . Trails. . 35% of the site cleared for development, which will reduce effects of surface water. . Clustering development away from the open space. We would appreciate your support on this matter. Thank you, John and Stacy Tribble 2106 Lyons AVE NE Renton WA 98059 John and Stacy Tribble jstribble a(�comcast.net CA-VV-A-lilne, ;,L . 2/7f; c 1.1.t%t,s--& L iAiL AL From: Citizens to Council Via Clerk To: Susan Oki Nitre Date: Wed, Feb 2, 2005 11:05 AM Subject: Re: R-1 Zone Community Separators Dear Mr. & Mrs. Oki: Thank you for your email to the Renton City Council. This subject is currently being considered by the Planning and Development Committee of Council. Copy will be distributed to all Councilmembers for review and consideration. Sincerely, Bonnie Walton City Clerk City of Renton 425-430-6502 >>> "Susan Oki" <susan@innovativecookies.com>2/1/2005 9:50:30 AM >>> Dear City Council & Planning Commission Members: As a property owner and resident, I am fully in support of staff's recommendation for urban separation of 50% or greater in our community which includes: 1)50% continguous mapped open space, 2) reforestation of that open space, and 3) an allowance for trails. I support the reduction of impervious surface in development of existing property as such reduction will minimize the impact of surface water runoff. My understanding is that development of particular sites will be limited to a maximum of 35%. If we are serious about preservation of our environment, quality of life, and recreational amenities in our region, we must adhere to this threshold/standard. Please vote in favor of the staff recommendation regarding this matter. Sincerely, Robert and Susan Oki 2406 Lyons Ave. N.E. Renton, WA 98059 Phone: 425-235-2880 Fax: 425-235-6328 `fire 4i. {-'k - -2 From: Citizens to Council Via Clerk To: Dennis Noland No'"' Date: Wed, Feb 2, 2005 11:06 AM Subject: Re: R-1 Zone Community Separators Dear Mr. Noland: Thank you for your email to the Renton City Council. This subject is currently being considered by the Planning and Development Committee of Council. Copy will be distributed to all Councilmembers for review and consideration. Sincerely, Bonnie Walton City Clerk City of Renton 425-430-6502 >>>"Dennis Noland" <dennis@shiftpoint.biz>2/1/2005 1:30:00 PM >>> Renton City Council I want to express my support for the work of the Renton Planning Commission in its efforts to refine a workable description and plan for R-1 Zone Community Separators. I support mandatory clustering, 50%contiguous open space provided by a mapped overlay, reforesting the open space, and 35% limits on site clearing for development. Dennis Noland 14326 S.E. 100th Place *gime Renton,WA 98059 425-226-7946 .• , a / � d-7 �dOS ififejtoLadepre_tryt:1‘ r9-641-"11. From: Citizens to Council Via Clerk To: Julie P. Bonwell , Niue Date: Wed, Feb 2, 2005 7:26 PM Subject: Re: FW: R-1 Zone Community Separators Dear Ms. Bonwell: Thank you for your email to the Renton City Council. This subject is currently being considered by the Planning and Development Committee of Council. Copy will be distributed to all Councilmembers for review and consideration. Sincerely, Bonnie Walton City Clerk City of Renton 425-430-6502 >>> "Julie P. Bonwell" <jbonwell@lesourd.com> 2/2/2005 3:28:31 PM >>> February 2, 2005 Renton Planning Commission c/o Rebecca Lind Neighborhoods & Strategic Planning Renton Council City of Renton Re: R-1 Zone Community Separators I continue to support the mandatory clustering of homes in ALL developments, particularly those in Urban *owe Separators, 50% open space, PARTICULARLY CONTIGUOUS open space, and 35% site clearing will undoubtedly make a HUGE difference on the impacts of surface water and subsequent erosion. If you have any doubts on moving forward with these guidelines, please look at the attached January 19, 2005, Seattle PI report on the State of Puget Sound. "Sprawling development has translated into more streets, ... driveways and rooftops. Scientists worry that the problem of polluted runoff will get worse . . unless stormwater is controlled." "In some urban streams, the fish are dying before they can spawn - likely victims of stormwater pollution." And that doesn't mean build more retention ponds. Forests, no matter how small, catch and hold rainwater, recharging underground water supplies and slowing the flow of runoff into rivers and ultimately the sea. In forests, "1 percent of runoff flow off the land,while AT LEAST 30 percent of the rainfall cascades off roadways and sidewalks, . . . eroding hillsides when the trees are chopped down." Emphasis added. It is worth repeating that any development/tree removal occurring both sides of May Valley from Renton through Newcastle and on out to Issaquah affects May Creek. Living near the creek, I see first hand the increase in water levels that occur within hours of a moderate to heavy rain, and the color of that water due to silt and impurities. Renton ahead of the curve? I hope so! J. Bonwell 9616 146th Avenue SE Renton,Washington 98059 State of Puget Sound troubling * Read the full article at: http://seattlepi.nwsource.com/local/208476 pugetsound 19.html �. a-y,?oOS From: Citizens to Council Via Clerk To: Paul Walser Date: Wed, Feb 2, 2005 7:29 PM Subject: Re: Permiting and Varience's Dear Mr. Walser: Thank you for your email to the Renton City Council. Copy is being distributed to all Councilmembers for review. You will be notified if Council action is taken on this matter. If I can provide further assistance, please feel free to contact me. Sincerely, Bonnie Walton City Clerk City of Renton 425-430-6502 >>> "Walser, Paul" <Paul.Walser@METROKC.GOV> 2/2/2005 1:16:55 PM >>> I have outlayed 5000 Dollars for plans and engineering for a home improvement and needed to apply for a varience to put a deck on the back of our home and was told by the planning board NO problem. We had 2 neighbors complain that we would be able to look in their yards,we can already see in their yards as there is a 6 to 10' elevation difference between our yard and theirs. So we were denied our varience for this reason? I and my family want to know how much common sense these people have that make these decisions?? I am not building the deck to look in their yards but for the view of the mountians and to complete the expansion of the home. I am trying to provide a bigger home for my family and improve the value of the homes in the neighborhood, as well as my own. I did not buy a home in King County because of their planning commision having a lack of common sense, I bought in the City of Renton because I had been told that they were easy to deal with and had a head on their shoulders, what happened?? I feel like we are talking to a brick wall. This project only means money in the City's cofer--Materials, permits and larger property taxes. I am just saying that I and my family are very dissapointed in the action that the Planning board has come up with and their LACK of logic instituted here. Look at all the new houses going up which have no yards or are looking in their neighbors house's. If I was a developer and bought this property and wanted to build this there would not be any problem at all--It would be approved in a flash, but the regular joe that wants to add to their home gets hosed--I can not build forward because of a right of way across my property, so we changed our plans and are just asking for a small deck on the back of the house and they say NO!! I wonder why people do not like do things by the book--I now understand why,this is rediculous. And by the way--One neighbor has a grudge agianst us and has a deck that he can see in our yard, But I can not have one--DUHR! The Walser Family Paul G14t ser 817 Monroe Ave NE Renon,Wa ql Su'; 425-277-9069 cr.;Cc,J vCiL Date 42-7-'aoosFINANCE COMMITTEE COMMITTEE REPORT February 7,2005 Renton Community Marketing Campaign Funding (Referred January 24, 2005) The Finance Committee recommends concurrence in the staff recommendation to approve contract/with Hamilton/Saunderson, marketing consultants, for a seventh year of the Renton Community Marketing Campaign and partner with other key community stakeholders by allocating $50,000 of Lodging Tax collections toward that effort. This allocation will be leveraged with additional financial contributions from the Department of Economic Development, Neighborhoods, & Strategic Planning's "business recruitment" budget and other community agencies, organizations and businesses to total $120,000. The Committee further recommends the Mayor and City Clerk be authorized to sign the contract/. Don Persson, Chair i Toni Nelson, Vice Chair Denis W. Law, Member cc: Alex Pietsch Victoria Runkle 1177777W:77) BY Ci,rw CC:U=,t Data a- ' •2061-5- FINANCE 2o' SFINANCE COMMITTEE COMMITTEE REPORT February 7,2005 Lease Amendment No. 2 with Iron Mountain Information Systems (Referred January 24, 2005) The Finance Committee recommends concurrence in the staff recommendation to approve the five-year Lease Amendment with options for two five-year extensions with Iron Mountain Information Systems, Inc., for continued tenancy of the fourth floor of Renton City Hall, 1055 South Grady Way, Renton, WA, 98055. The Committee further recommends that the Mayor and City Clerk be authorized to sign the Lease Amendment No. 2 with Iron Mountain Information Systems. Don Persson, Chair oni N- son, Vice air Denis W. Law, Member cc: Victoria Runkle, Peter Renner Dennis Culp IronMLeaseAm.dod Rev 01/04 bh .x,11;171 By COUNCIL PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT COMMITTEE # 01 7 a00S COMMITTEE REPORT February 7,2005 2004 Title IV Code Docket and Related Amendments (Referred May 10, 2004) The Planning& Development Committee recommends concurrence in the staff recommendation to set a public hearing date of February 28, 2005, for the 2004 Title IV Code Docket and Related Amendments. This subject will remain in Committee for further review and consideration. Dan Clawson, Chair W • Denis W. Law, Vice Chair Ite/WeL-- Marcie Palmer, Member cc: Alex Pietsch Rebecca Lind ArPT-7'7,V177.) tai C:77 C'aCiL UTILITIES COMMITTEE COMMITTEE REPORT Date -7- a605 February 7, 2005 2005 Update to the Water System Plan (Referred January 24, 2005) The Utilities Committee recommends concurrence in the staff recommendation to adopt the 2005 Update to the Water System Plan and to forward the plan to King County and the Washington State Department of Health for approval. The Committee further recommends that the resolution regarding this matter be presented for reading and adoption. 'andy Corman, Chair Dan Clawson, Vice Chair 6v1, Don Persson, Member cc: Lys Hornsby Abdoul Gafour 7-#2005- CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON RESOLUTION NO. 373 /T A RESOLUTION OF '1'IH CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON, RENAMING A PORTION OF RIVERSIDE DRIVE TO NISHIWAKI LANE IN HONOR OF RENTON'S SISTER CITY. WHEREAS,in 1969 the City of Renton established a Sister City relationship with Nishiwaki, Japan, in order to help promote mutual understanding and good will between the United States and Japan; and WHEREAS, the City has helped to maintained its relationship with Nishiwaki through the efforts of Renton's Nishiwaki Sister City Committee, and by periodic visits to Nishiwaki and Renton by delegations from either City; and WHEREAS,Renton has been enriched by the exchange of ideas and culture that has been provided by Nishiwaki; and WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Renton wishes to honor Nishiwaki for its long-standing Sister City relationship with the City of Renton; NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON, DO RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS: SECTION I. The above findings are true and correct in all respects. SECTION H. The section of Riverside Drive from the intersection of N. 6th Street and Logan Avenue North, continuing north along the Cedar River Trail to the Trail's end, shall hereafter be known as Nishiwaki Lane. 1 RESOLUTION NO. PASSED BY THE CITY COUNCIL this day of , 2005. Bonnie I. Walton, City Clerk APPROVED BY THE MAYOR this day of , 2005. Kathy Keolker-Wheeler, Mayor Approved as to form: Lawrence J. Warren, City Attorney RES.1089:1/21/05 2 a-woos CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON RESOLUTION NO. 5735 735- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON, SETTING A HEARING DATE TO VACATE A PORTION OF NE 4th STREET, EAST OF ROSARIO AVENUE NE (CITY OF RENTON; VAC- 04-006). WHEREAS, a Petition has been filed with the City Clerk of the City of Renton on or about December 21, 2004, pursuant to the requirements of RCW 35.79, petitioning for the vacation of a portion of NE 4th Street, as hereinafter more particularly described, and said petition having been signed by the owners of more than two-thirds (2/3) of the property abutting upon said alley sought to be vacated, and same being described as follows: See Exhibit "A" attached hereto and made a part hereof as if fully set forth herein (A portion of NE 4th Street, beginning approximately 180 feet east of Rosario Avenue NE). NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON, DO RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS: SECTION I. That the 7th day of March, 2005, at the hour of 7:30 P.M. at the City Council Chambers at City Hall, Renton, King County, Washington, be and is hereby fixed as the time and place for a public hearing to consider the aforesaid Petition for vacating a portion of NE 4th Street, beginning approximately 180 feet east of Rosario Avenue NE, which said hearing date is not more than sixty nor less than twenty days from the date of passage of this Resolution. SECTION IL The City Clerk is hereby authorized and directed to give notice of said time and date of the hearing as provided in RCW 35.79.020 and any and/or all persons interested therein or objecting to said vacation may then appear and be heard thereon, or they may 1 RESOLUTION NO. file their written objections thereto with the City Clerk at or prior to the time of hearing on said vacation. SECTION EEL The City Council shall determine, as provided in RCW 35.79.030, as to whether an appraisal shall be secured to determine the fair market value of the property sought to be vacated as provided for in Ordinance No. 4266, and the amount of compensation to be paid by the Petitioner-Owners to the City for such vacation. The City likewise reserves the right to retain an easement for public utility and related purposes. PASSED BY THE CITY COUNCIL this day of , 2005. Bonnie I. Walton, City Clerk APPROVED BY THE MAYOR this day of , 2005. Kathy Keolker-Wheeler, Mayor Approved as to form: Lawrence.I. Warren, City Attorney RES.1092:01/31/05 2 Exhibit A Legal Description The Northerly 8 feet of the following described property: The West 150 feet of the East 1166.01 feet of the North 1/2 of the N.E. 1/2 of the N.W. '/as measured along the North line of Section 14,Township 23 North,Range 5 East, W.M.,LESS the South 320.69 feet,and also LESS County Road,in the City of Renton,in King County,Washington. Situate in the Northwest Quarter of Section 14,Township 23 North,Range 5 East,W.M.,in the City of Renton, King County,Washington. I:\Admin\Amberwood II Street Vacation Petition.doc\krw Exhibit B Map Exhibit Amberwood 2/NE 4th Street Vacation E € I id czi r-,..kg..4XaBl_",` .E.428dranalA7 _ LU ......J tlr rtEAR JT A + N IC)2D09 King County o 100t{ Proposed Vacation I:Wdmin\Amberwood II Street Vacation Petition.doc • a-7 AM's CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON RESOLUTION NO. .9786 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON, APPROVING FINAL PLAT (CEDAR AVENUE; FILE NO. LUA-04- 137FP). ' WHEREAS, a petition for the approval of a final plat for the subdivision of a certain tract of land as hereinafter more particularly described, located within the City of Renton, has been duly approved by the Planning/Building/Public Works Department; and WHEREAS, after investigation, the Administrator of the Planning/Building/Public Works Department has considered and recommended the approval of the final plat, and the approval is proper and advisable and in the public interest; and WHEREAS, the City Council has determined that appropriate provisions are made for the public health, safety, and general welfare and for such open spaces, drainage ways, streets or roads, alleys, other public ways, transit stops, potable water supplies, sanitary wastes, parks and recreation, playgrounds, schools, schoolgrounds, sidewalks and other planning features that assure safe walking conditions for students who walk to and from school; and WHEREAS, the City Council has determined that the public use and interest will be served by the platting of the subdivision and dedication; NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON, DO ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS: • SECTION I. The above findings are true and correct in all respects. SECTION II. The final plat approved by the Planning/Building/Public Works Department pertaining to the following described real estate, to wit: See Exhibit "A" attached hereto and made a part hereof as if fully set forth l RESOLUTION NO. (The property, consisting of approximately 9.5 acres, is located in the vicinity of Wells Avenue S., S. 36th Street and Cedar Avenue S.) is hereby approved as such plat, subject to the laws and ordinances of the City of Renton, and subject to the findings, conclusions, and recommendation of the Planning/Building/Public Works Department dated January 28, 2005. PASSED BY THE CITY COUNCIL this day of , 2005. Bonnie I. Walton,City Clerk APPROVED BY THE MAYOR this day of , 2005. Kathy Keolker-Wheeler, Mayor Approved as to form: Lawrence J. Warren, City Attorney RES.1093:01/31/05:ma 2 4 EXHIBIT 'A' Legal Description Parcel A, City of Renton Lot Line Adjustment No. LUA-04-049 recorded under Recording Number 20040720900002, said Lot Line Adjustment being a portion of the southwest quarter of the southwest quarter of Section 29, Township 23 North, Range 5 East, W.M., in King county, Washington. 0 515 a -44 r m 4 Z th ' -- CEDAR A W SE r74th 7S . .' (W �� 'at A ,3_,„ R� 1.76t ST I� gk CEDAR AVENUE 117 WC/N/TY MAP NOT TO SCALE 7471 t NE 29th Place,#707 CORE 8 5.885. 877 Fox 4 98007 425.885.7877 Fax 425.885,7463 DESIGN ENGINEERING • PLANNING • SURVEYING Jc)Et NC?_ 0AL_0 ade./2,ra -7.2 &5 CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON RESOLUTION NO. 3 737 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON, AUTHORIZING SIGNATURE FOR DEPOSITORIES AND ELECTRONIC FUND TRANSFERS ON BEHALF OF AND IN THE NAME OF THE CITY OF RENTON. WHEREAS, the City of Renton maintains one or more accounts at one or more qualified public depositories, including the state operated Local Government Investment Pool for primary banking, investing, or third party trust agreement purposes; and WHEREAS, the City's appointed Finance & Information Services Administrator is hereby authorized and directed to open and maintain these accounts as required from time to time on behalf of and in the name of the City of Renton; NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON, DO RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS: SECTION L The depositories are hereby authorized to honor and pay checks, drafts, and similar instruments in the name of the City of Renton and signed by any one of the following officers and officials of the City of Renton: Title Name Mayor Kathy Keolker-Wheeler Fiscal Services Director Linda Parks SECTION II. Any of the above named officers or officials are further authorized to endorse any such checks, drafts, or other instruments made payable to the City of Renton for the purpose of depositing same into the City's accounts. I RESOLUTION NO. SECTION M. The designated depository for the account in the name of City of Renton Municipal Court(Municipal Court account) is hereby authorized to honor and pay checks, drafts, and similar instruments signed by the Court Services Director or Municipal Court Judge. The Director or Judge are further authorized to endorse checks, drafts, or other instruments made payable to the City of Renton for the purpose of depositing the same into the Municipal Court account. Title Name Court Services Director Joseph T. McGuire Muncipal Court Judge Terry L. Jurado SECTION IV. The following individuals are authorized to initiate and/or approve electronic fund transfers for the purposes of disbursing and depositing City funds for the purposes of investing, cash management, and accomplishing authorized City business in the City's name: Title Name Initiate Approve Fiscal Services Director Linda Parks Yes Yes Finance Analyst Supervisor Cindy Zinek Yes Yes Finance Analyst Linda Dixon Yes No SECTION V. There shall be no obligation on the part of the depositories to see the application of funds in any case whatsoever, and that a true copy of this resolution be certified and delivered to each said depository at the time any such account is opened on behalf of the City of Renton. SECTION VI. Effective February 11, 2005, Section I and Section IV of Resolution No. 3706, which was passed and approved on August 9, 2004, is hereby repealed. 2 RESOLUTION NO. PASSED BY THE CITY COUNCIL this day of , 2005. Bonnie I. Walton, City Clerk APPROVED BY THE MAYOR this day of , 2005. Kathy Keolker-Wheeler, Mayor Approved as to form: Lawrence J. Warren, City Attorney RES.1091:1/25/05:ma 3 a ` (1-43ta 0?-7,R005' CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON RESOLUTION NO. 3 7S$' A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON, AUTHORIZING THE MAYOR AND CITY CLERK TO ENTER INTO AN INTERLOCAL COOPERATIVE AGREEMENT WITH KING COUNTY, SOUND TRANSIT, AND PIERCE TRANSIT FOR THE SALE OF FLEXPASSES TO CITY OF RENTON EMPLOYEES BY KING COUNTY. WHEREAS, the City of Renton, King County, Pierce Transit, and Sound Transit (Transportation Parties) share the desire to provide a transportation management program that will reduce single-occupant vehicle travel and improve the mobility of employees to the City's worksites; and WHEREAS, the Transportation Parties provide buses, vanpools and the Home Free Guarantee program; and WHEREAS, the Transportation Parties, through those programs, are authorized to promote alternatives to single occupant vehicle commuting in King County; and WHEREAS, the City wishes to provide incentives to its employees which promote non- single-occupant vehicle commuting to its worksites; and WHEREAS, the City and the Transportation Parties desire to utilize FlexPasses which can be used to access a variety of services and benefits which enable the City's employees to commute by non-single occupant vehicles; and WHEREAS, it is necessary to document the terms and conditions under which such program will be provided by the County to the City; NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON, DO RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS: 1 RESOLUTION NO. SECTION L The above findings are true and correct in all respects. SECTION II. The Mayor and City Clerk are hereby authorized to enter into an interlocal cooperative agreement for the sale of passes between King County, Sound Transit, Pierce Transit, and the City of Renton for FlexPasses, vanpool fare incentive, and the Home Free Guarantee program, and all subsequent agreements that do not materially change the terms of the agreement and are without budget parameters. PASSED BY THE CITY COUNCIL this day of , 2005. Bonnie I. Walton, City Clerk APPROVED BY THE MAYOR this day of , 2005, Kathy Keolker-Wheeler, Mayor Approved as to form: Lawrence J. Warren, City Attorney RES.1090:1/21/05:ma 2 ad-0/(A/ 0?-9-01 405- CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON RESOLUTION NO. 373 A RESOLUTION OF '1JiJ CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON, ADOPTING TLE 2005 WATER SYSTEM PLAN. WHEREAS, the 2005 Water System Plan ("Plan") was reviewed by the City of Renton Environmental Review Committee, which issued a Determination of Non-Significance; and WHEREAS, a Notice of Environmental Determination was made public, and no comments or appeals were received during the public comment and appeal periods, which ended November 29, 2004; and WHEREAS, the Plan was presented to the Renton City Council, discussed at a meeting of the Utilities Committee, and recommended for adoption by the full City Council; and WHEREAS, the Plan is compatible with the intent of the City's adopted Comprehensive Plans; NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON, DO RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS: SECTION L The above findings are true and correct in all respects. SECTIQN IL The 2005 Water System Plan is hereby adopted by the City of Renton. PASSED BY THE CITY COUNCIL this day of , 2005. Bonnie I. Walton, City Clerk 1 x RESOLUTION NO. APPROVED BY THE MAYOR this day of , 2005. Kathy Keolker-Wheeler, Mayor Approved as to form: Lawrence J. Warren, City Attorney RES.1086:1/12/05:ma 2 a-7-02005" vem i/ Oitie4tetyce_ ' a''`f t -V,1.ns/ . /Minor Revisions ) Pales a w 3 CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON ORDINANCE NO. 5 i AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON, AMENDING SECTIONS 4-2-060, 4-2-070, AND 4-2-080, OF CHAPTER 2, ZONING DISTRICTS - USES AND STANDARDS, AND SECTION 4-3-100 OF CHAPTER 3, ENVIRONMENTAL REGULATIONS AND OVERLAY DISTRICTS, AND CHAPTER 11, DEFINITIONS, OF TITLE IV (DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS) OF ORDINANCE NO. 4260 ENTITLED "CODE OF GENERAL ORDINANCES OF THE CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON" BY REVISING URBAN CENTER DESIGN OVERLAY REGULATIONS FOR DEVELOPMENT IN THE URBAN CENTER. THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON, DO ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS: SECTION I. Subsection I, Retail, of Section 4-2-060, Zoning Use Table — Uses Allowed in Zoning Designations, of Chapter 2, Zoning Districts — Uses and Standards, of Title IV (Development Regulations) of Ordinance No. 4260 entitled "Code of General Ordinances of the City of Renton, Washington"is hereby amended to read as shown in Attachment A. SECTION II. The use table subsection entitled "RETAIL" in subsection 4-2- 070.K, Commercial Arterial (CA), of Chapter 2, Zoning Districts —Uses and Standards, of Title IV (Development Regulations) of Ordinance No. 4260 entitled "Code of General Ordinances of the City of Renton, Washington"is hereby amended to read as shown on Attachment B. SECTION III. The use table subsection entitled "RETAIL" in Section 4-2-070.N, Commercial/Office/Residential (COR), of Chapter 2, Zoning Districts — Uses and Standards, of Title IV (Development Regulations) of Ordinance No. 4260 entitled "Code of General ORDINANCE NO. Ordinances of the City of Renton, Washington" is hereby amended to read as shown on Attachment B. SECTION IV. The use table subsection entitled "RETAIL" in subsection 4-2- 070.0, Industrial Light (IL), of Chapter 2, Zoning Districts — Uses and Standards, of Title IV (Development Regulations) of Ordinance No. 4260 entitled "Code of General Ordinances of the City of Renton, Washington"is hereby amended to read as shown on Attachment B. SECTION V. The use table subsection entitled "RETAIL" in Section 4-2-070.P, Industrial Medium (IM), of Chapter 2, Zoning Districts — Uses and Standards, of Title IV (Development Regulations) of Ordinance No. 4260 entitled "Code of General Ordinances of the City of Renton, Washington"is hereby amended to read as shown on Attachment B. SECTION VI. The use table subsection entitled "RETAIL" in Section 4-2-070.Q, Industrial Heavy (IH), of Chapter 2, Zoning Districts — Uses and Standards, of Title IV (Development Regulations) of Ordinance No. 4260 entitled "Code of General Ordinances of the City of Renton, Washington"is hereby amended to read as shown on Attachment B. SECTION VII. Section 4-2-080.A.72 of Chapter 2, Zoning Districts — Uses and Standards, of Title IV (Development Regulations) of Ordinance No. 4260 entitled "Code of General Ordinances of the City of Renton, Washington" is hereby amended to read as follows: 72. Big-box retail uses are subject to compliance with Design Regulations applicable to District 'C' as detailed in RMC 4-3-100, except in the Employment Area — Valley south of Interstate 405. Big-box retail uses are not permitted in the NE 4th Street Commercial Corridor, Puget Commercial Corridor, and NE Sunset Blvd. Commercial Corridor within the Commercial Arterial (CA) Zone. 2 ORDINANCE NO. SECTION VIII. Section 4-3-100, Urban Center Design Overlay Regulations, of Chapter 3, Environmental Regulations and Overlay Districts, of Title IV (Development Regulations) of Ordinance No. 4260 entitled"Code of General Ordinances of the City of Renton, Washington"is hereby amended to read as follows: RMC 4-3-100 URBAN DESIGN REGULATIONS: A. PURPOSE: The purpose of this Section is to: 1. Establish design review regulations in accordance with policies established in the Land Use and Community Design Elements of the Renton Comprehensive Plan in order to: a. Maintain and protect property values, b. Enhance the general appearance of the City, c. Encourage creativity in building and site design, d. Achieve predictability, balanced with flexibility, and e. Consider the individual merits of proposals. 2. Create design standards and guidelines specific to District 'A' (the Downtown Core) that ensure design quality of structures and site development implementing the City of Renton's Comprehensive Plan Vision for its Urban Center—Downtown. The Vision is of a downtown that will continue to develop into an efficient and attractive urban city. The Vision of the Downtown Core is of mixed-uses with high-density residential living supported by multi- modal transit opportunities. Redevelopment will be based on the pattern and scale of established streets and buildings. 3. Create design standards and guidelines specific to District `B' (the South Renton Neighborhood)that ensure design quality of structures and site development implementing the 3 ORDINANCE NO. City's South Renton Neighborhood Plan. The South Renton Neighborhood Plan, for a residential area located within the Urban Center—Downtown, maintains the existing, traditional grid street plan and respects the scale of the neighborhood, while providing new housing at urban densities. The South Renton Neighborhood Plan supports a residential area that is positioned to capitalize on the employment and retail opportunities increasingly available in the nearby Downtown Core. 4. Create design standards and guidelines specific to the Urban Center—North (District 'C') that ensure design quality of structures and site development that implements the City of Renton's Comprehensive Plan Vision for its Urban Center—North. This Vision is of an urban environment that concentrates uses in a"grid pattern" of streets and blocks. The Vision is of a vibrant, economically vital neighborhood that encourages use throughout by pedestrians. 5. Create design standards and guidelines applicable to the use of"big-box retail" as defined in RMC 4-11-180, Definitions. 6. Establish two categories of regulations: (a) "minimum standards" that must be met, and(b) "guidelines"that, while not mandatory, are considered by the Development Services Director in determining if the proposed action meets the intent of the design guidelines. In the Urban Center Design Overlay area, specific minimum standards and guidelines may apply to all three districts, or certain districts only(Districts 'A', `B', or 'C'), as indicated herein. B. APPLICABILITY: 1. This Section shall apply to all development in the Urban Center—Downtown and Urban Center—North. For the purposes of the Design Regulations, the Center Downtown is District 'A', South Renton is District 'B', and the Urban Center-North is District 'C'. Districts 4 ORDINANCE NO. A-C are depicted on the Urban Center Design Overlay District Map, shown in subsection 4 of this Section. 2. This Section shall also apply to big-box retail use where allowed in the Commercial Arterial (CA), Light Industrial (IL), Medium Industrial (IM), and Heavy Industrial (IH) zones, except when those zones are located in the Employment Area—Valley south of Interstate 405. Big-box retail uses within these zones, except in the Employment Area—Valley, must comply with design standards and guidelines specific to the Urban Center—North(District 'C'). 3. Where conflicts may be construed between the RMC 4-3-100, Design Regulations and other sections of the Renton Municipal Code, the Regulations of RMC 4-3-100 shall prevail. 4. Urban Center Design Overlay District Map: 5 ORDINANCE NO. . / f'... Y !; =. '>� ,fin r' ��^ "' El=raE y -illN - ,t /� , \\,-.._:.fz_l�y � r`.' I 1'y , . _ E= .17-- I RUM ; L \\;: r';r lit I I 1 \; :,., \\\ \ w E ", r-H.-i "": \ \..= \ \\- 1 34"11];• \6:r,S- �'1' \ 6'1S=I 1 i �� . 1 _;- District C I. ,i . 1► � .,749 A � f1 � 44,r-- -,4 p YUS l .11„ !_.: �_ - Vit ,� �.__ ,\-. //,;(71/1 =' DO '7---- 7. I g-•114.-E'll . 1 ,..2 .•.. ,•--/ / :,, ,,, , _i C::0= .F> '�r� ' F`1-;fes/ \'-i, . �'I"1 s'AYE:-"; I�!x�' t'-", j iJ � ,,„:,:f.,,2 m •H •ri.7_, ' ' =_ r,„ k.L_.., ; = G• •___ ,_ ___:::., ,.,,....;..„,.,,,,.„..„,,...„, _,.. .,.. ; DistrictA , 7-7 � I �� -r�6 � fir. To�� -}-;,�' g�q;� 'i i a'�a� .� ti i rta tea pusIIII• s� LA, lit too IC:7775:IR District B k� j I � � ._,N� u � �; �� ,� ,, ��awl �. '�. I "fir - ' 1,W Le- • \ I ., , , ........,... ,..,.,_,:. . _,_ ____..,.. /1, .f ',.. ..L4� Sefi! rt:E.7,.2-,.=::::_ �` , N. 1 I[ 117/—\t as 1__.. 1 ! 1 m .— \.. _ r .t Urban Center Design OverlayDistrict Map g /„.....,. Economic Development,Neighhochood.and Strategic Planning •t j• Ai<x H<ttxh.Ad,ninnuanor —--— City Lints (i Dcl R ,, 17 6 ORDINANCE NO. C. EXEMPTIONS: The Design Regulations shall not apply to: 1. Interior Remodels: Interior remodels of existing buildings or structures provided the alterations do not modify the building facade. 2. Aircraft manufacturing: Structures related to the existing use of aircraft manufacturing in District 'C'. D. ADMINISTRATION: 1. Review Process: Applications subject to Design Regulations shall be processed as a component of the governing land use process. 2. Authority: The Director of the Development Services Division shall have the authority to approve, approve with conditions, or deny proposals based upon the provisions of the Design Regulations. In rendering a decision, the Director will consider proposals on the basis of individual merit, will consider the overall intent of the minimum standards and guidelines, and will encourage creative design alternatives in order to achieve the purposes of the Design Regulations. E. SITE DESIGN AND BUILDING LOCATION: Intent: To ensure that buildings are located in relation to streets and other buildings so that the Vision of the City of Renton can be realized for a high-density urban environment; so that businesses enjoy visibility from public rights-of-way; and to encourage pedestrian activity throughout the district. 1. Site Design and Street Pattern: Intent: To ensure that the City of Renton Vision can be realized within the Urban Center Districts; plan districts that are organized for efficiency while maintaining flexibility for future 7 ORDINANCE NO. development at high urban densities and intensities of use; create and maintain a safe, convenient network of streets of varying dimensions for vehicle circulation; and provide service to businesses. a. Minimum Standards for Districts 'A' and `B': Maintain existing grid street pattern. b. Minimum Standards for District 'C': i. Provide a network of public and/or private local streets in addition to public arterials. ii. Maintain a hierarchy of streets to provide organized circulation that promotes use by multiple transportation modes and to avoid overburdening the roadway system. The hierarchy shall consist of(from greatest in size to smallest): (a) High Visibility Street. A highly visible arterial street that warrants special design treatment to improve its appearance and maintain its transportation function. (b) Arterial Street. A street classified as a principal arterial on the City's Arterial Street Plan. (c) Pedestrian-Oriented Streets. Streets that are intended to feature a concentration of pedestrian activity. Such streets feature slow moving traffic, narrow travel lanes, on-street parking, and wide sidewalks. (d) Internal or Local Roads (public or private) (e) Drive aisles 2. Building Location and Orientation: 8 ORDINANCE NO. Intent: To ensure visibility of businesses; establish active, lively uses along sidewalks and pedestrian pathways; organize buildings in such a way that pedestrian use of the district is facilitated; encourage siting of structures so that natural light and solar access are available to other structures and open space; enhance the visual character and definition of streets within the district; provide an appropriate transition between buildings,parking areas, and other land uses and the street; and increase privacy for residential uses located near the street. a. Minimum Standards for Districts 'A' and 'B': Orient buildings to the street with clear connections to the sidewalk. b. Minimum Standards for District 'C': i. Buildings on designated pedestrian-oriented streets shall feature "pedestrian-oriented facades" and clear connections to the sidewalk (see illustration, RMC 4-3- 100.E.7.a). Such buildings shall be located adjacent to the sidewalk, except where pedestrian- oriented space is located between the building and the sidewalk. Parking between the building and pedestrian-oriented streets is prohibited. ii. Buildings fronting on pedestrian-oriented streets shall contain pedestrian-oriented uses. iii. Non-residential buildings may be located directly adjacent to any street as long as they feature a pedestrian-oriented façade. iv. Buildings containing street-level residential uses and single- purpose residential buildings shall be set back from the sidewalk a minimum of ten (10) feet and feature substanial landscaping between the sidewalk and the building (see illustration, RMC 4-3- 100.E.7.b). 9 ORDINANCE NO. v. If buildings do not feature pedestrian-oriented facades they shall have substantial landscaping between the sidewalk and building. Such landscaping shall be at least ten (10) feet in width as measured from the sidewalk (see illustration, RMC 4-3-100.E.7.c). c. Guidelines Applicable to District 'C': i. Siting of a structure should take into consideration the continued availability of natural light (both direct and reflected) and direct sun exposure to nearby buildings and open space (except parking areas). ii. Ground floor residential uses located near the street should be raised above street level for residents' privacy. 3. Building Entries: Intent: To make building entrances convenient to locate and easy to access, and ensure that building entries further the pedestrian nature of the fronting sidewalk and the urban character of the district. a. Minimum Standard for Districts 'A' and 'B': Entrance Location: A primary entrance of each building shall be located on the facade facing a street. Such entrances shall be prominent, visible from the street, connected by a walkway to the public sidewalk, and include human scale elements. b. Minimum Standards for District 'C': i. On pedestrian-oriented streets, the primary entrance of each building shall be located on the facade facing the street. ii. On non-pedestrian-oriented streets, entrances shall be prominent, visible from surrounding streets, connected by a walkway to the public sidewalk, and include human-scale elements. 10 ORDINANCE NO. iii. All building entries adjacent to a street shall be clearly marked with canopies, architectural elements, ornamental lighting, and/or landscaping. Entries from parking lots should be subordinate to those related to the street for buildings with frontage on designated pedestrian-oriented streets (see illustration, RMC 4-3-100.E.7.d). iv. Weather protection at least four and one-half(4-1/2) feet wide and proportional to the distance above ground level shall be provided over the primary entry of all buildings and over any entry adjacent to a street. v. Pedestrian pathways from public sidewalks to primary entrances, or from parking lots to primary entrances shall be clearly delineated. c. Guidelines Applicable to All Districts: i. Multiple buildings on the same site should provide a continuous network of pedestrian paths and open spaces that incorporate landscaping to provide a directed view to building entries. ii. Ground floor units should be directly accessible from the street or an open space such as a courtyard or garden that is accessible from the street. iii. Secondary access (not fronting on a street) should have weather protection at least four and one-half(4-1/2) feet wide over the entrance or other similar indicator of access. iv. Pedestrian access should be provided to the building from property edges, adjacent lots, abutting street intersections, crosswalks, and transit stops. v. Features such as entries, lobbies, and display windows should be oriented to a street or pedestrian-oriented space; otherwise, screening or decorative features such 11 ORDINANCE NO. as trellises, artwork, murals, landscaping, or combinations thereof, should be incorporated into the street-oriented façade. d. Guidelines Applicable to District 'A': i. For projects that include residential uses, entries should provide transition space between the public street and the private residence such as a porch, landscaped area, terrace, common area, lobby, or similar feature. ii. Features such as entries, lobbies, and display windows should be oriented to a street; otherwise, screening or art features such as trellises, artwork, murals, landscaping, or combinations thereof, should be incorporated into the street-oriented facade. iii. Entries from the street should be clearly marked with canopies, architectural elements, ornamental lighting, or landscaping. Entries from parking lots should be subordinate to those related to the street for buildings within District 'A'. e. Guidelines Applicable to District 'B': Front yards should provide transition space between the public street and the private residence such as a porch, landscaped area, terrace, or similar feature. f. Guidelines Applicable to District 'C': For projects that include residential uses, entries should provide transition space between the public street and the private residence such as a porch, landscaped area, terrace, common area, lobby, or similar feature. 4. Transition to Surrounding Development: Intent: To shape redevelopment projects so that the character and value of Renton's long-established, existing neighborhoods are preserved. a. Minimum Standards for District 'A': 12 ORDINANCE NO. Careful siting and design treatment is necessary to achieve a compatible transition where new buildings differ from surrounding development in terms of building height, bulk, and scale. At least one of the following design elements shall be considered to promote a transition to surrounding uses: i. Setbacks at the side or rear of a building may be increased by the Reviewing Official in order to reduce the bulk and scale of larger buildings so that sunlight reaches adjacent yards; ii. Building proportions, including step-backs on upper levels; iii. Building articulation to divide a larger architectural element into smaller increments; or iv. Roof lines, roof pitches, and roof shapes designed to reduce apparent bulk and transition with existing development. b. Minimum Standards for District `B': i. Careful siting and design treatment is necessary to achieve a compatible transition where new buildings differ from surrounding development in terms of building height, bulk, and scale. At least one of the following design elements shall be provided to promote a transition to surrounding uses: (a) Setbacks at the side or rear of a building increased in order to reduce the bulk and scale of larger buildings and so that sunlight reaches adjacent yards; or (b) Building articulation provided to divide a larger architectural element into smaller pieces; or (c) Roof lines, roof pitches, and roof shapes designed to reduce apparent bulk and transition with existing development. 13 ORDINANCE NO. ii. In areas with older style, steeply-pitched, single-family homes, similar roof styles are required to achieve more harmonious relationships between new and old buildings. c. Minimum Standards for District 'C': i. For properties along North 6th Street and Logan Avenue North (between North 4th Street and North 6th Street), applicants shall demonstrate how their project provides an appropriate transition to the long established, existing neighborhood south of North 6th Street known as the North Renton Neighborhood. ii. For properties located south of North 8th Street, east of Garden Avenue North, applicants must demonstrate how their project appropriately provides transitions to existing industrial uses. 5. Service Element Location and Design: Intent: To reduce the potential negative impacts of service elements (i.e. waste receptacles, loading docks) by locating service and loading areas away from high-volume pedestrian areas, and screening them from view in high visibility areas. a. Minimum Standards for All Districts: i. Service elements shall be located and designed to minimize the impacts on the pedestrian environment and adjacent uses. Service elements shall be concentrated and located where they are accessible to service vehicles and convenient for tenant use (see illustration, RMC 4-3-100.E.7.e). ii. Garbage, recycling collection, and utility areas shall be enclosed, consistent with RMC 4-4-090, Refuse and Recyclables Standards and RMC 4-4-095, Screening and Storage Height/Location Limitations. 14 ORDINANCE NO. iii. In addition to standard enclosure requirements, garbage, recycling collection, and utility areas shall be enclosed on all sides, including the roof and screened around their perimeter by a wall or fence and have self-closing doors (see illustration, RMC 4-3- 100.E.7.f). iv. The use of chain link, plastic, or wire fencing is prohibited. v. If the service area is adjacent to a street, pathway, or pedestrian- oriented space, a landscaped planting strip, minimum three feet wide, shall be located on three sides of such facility. b. Guidelines Applicable to All Districts: Service enclosure fences should be made of masonry, ornamental metal or wood, or some combination of the three. 6. Gateways: Intent: To distinguish Gateways as primary entrances to districts or to the City; provide special design features and architectural elements at Gateways; and ensure that Gateways, while they are distinctive within the context of the district, are compatible with the district in form and scale. a. Minimum Standards for District 'C': i. Developments located at district gateways shall be marked with visually prominent features (see illustration, RMC 4-3-100.E.7.g). ii. Gateway elements shall be oriented toward and scaled for both pedestrians and vehicles (see illustration, RMC 4-3-100.E.7.h). iii. Visual prominence shall be distinguished by two or more of the following: 15 ORDINANCE NO. (a) Public art (b) Monuments (c) Special landscape treatment (d) Open space/plaza (e) Identifying building form (f) Special paving, unique pedestrian scale lighting, or bollards (g) Prominent architectural features (trellis, arbor, pergola, or gazebo) (h) Signage, displaying neighborhood or district entry identification (commercial signs are not allowed) 7. Illustrations \ Pedestrian-oriented \II }.... facade 1:.ltl.' `,i1 kill Property hoe „ �yf; /.-,\ +Y`'? ''..`ice? Pedestrianoriented facades: /-��"""��" �\ ',xf+,_, />r�� \;f kS Pnmary building entry ��- l,._ must be facing the street ,• ;) transparent window area or window �� `- T� �` display along 75%of the ground floor � between the height of 2 to 8 feet Q \ilk;"l S above the ground r weather protection at least 4%feet wade- -� along at least 75%of the facade \. a. Pedestrian-oriented facades (See RMC 4-3-100.E.2.b.i) 16 ORDINANCE NO. Raised planters provide privacy IC for residents while maintaining views of the street horn units .i iTrees ��`` omit, i� 1,* 1=4111114, �•: "Gihlllll!ICI°`l .'..;_-t,-._.,.____14_,, F e , R: 11111 ' �� ,z____ --7--_ -.-Air..774Lstji,„-.4t.‘ev-Liti-.4, .11.4lli.4i::::77:11' t..:.,.:: e b 1y ' '\ t[ln., klhe a �ta= 1MIw °.lI -••-••,_---,--z--- ------ b. Street-level residential (See RMC 4-3-100.E.2.b.iv) Combination of evergreen and Building---, deciduous shrubs and trees�, ) . e'-'-,,,c_ ,tom!._ - �!!gil� I Raised planter C. Buildings without pedestrian-oriented uses (See RMC 4-3-100.E.2.b.v) 17 ORDINANCE NO. •''s** :1,(11.\\\\'',.\, ;i,1 ,. c��;;oi11 k. aid i1t,^, Nom•`I; I( !'; 'EINa jl'i:•4 i'll ooh. fJ„_i, �1 OP6 - --mid : Ifis�� * i+ l''-.IiirtPtii:7/1107:77gra-111-- -44 r41-r44:44jillieliirli41#11”; ''''.1' slili 47- are, . ,..... •idg. itraVilkla44440 d. Building entries (See RMC 4-3-100.E.3.b.iii) SCREENED MECHAMCAL ,0011 EQUIPMENT DUMPSTER 111 LOCATED AT ' REAR OF �� SITE •�,�� /\ /1 i•:••�," 0 • ASH R�o � 6y�F SI°' (/1 e. Service elements located to minimize the impact on the pedestrian environment (See RMC 4-3-100.E.5.a.i) 18 ORDINANCE NO. Roof enclosure Landscaping to keep birds out Y '0 01-..r.,t§it.; ?.t.<4314101 :z Self-closing -10 doors Trellis '.-- Concrete pad f. Service enclosure (See RMC 4-3-100.E,.5.a.iii) CEI mmmCO TA CO m m m Elevation ■n�ifi� ■.■ I Finn Tvm+ Com.,—.msng M:_... ____] Plan 1,?[ 11111E111111111111= / J l Note Ensun Nat baking don not docklaa tr+ , angN H nlersKUons 00000 a ElBvatlon 00000 PSIInCbW use olmelenel5 caagy Bayninarnr pPlan uny VI Il1i 1I11II1111111+11 . ) / / g. Distinguishable building form appropriate for gateway locations (See RMC 4-3- 100.E.6.a.i) ti I wil < :'''''tt'' '''171; :',..:2':-* .::'r-:''*.' -'..1:2,--'1%,,,,,, ,, ,i: „,,., . i -. d , tk - 'it !' '''' I " . - : .1+ ;i :,',',, et a r;,-.� y�....s,.E Y iu . . _ ' ‘-':', L'4.* `a4.' 4-., _ v ``� ',_ . , �� 1'"�"'�=_.. . '+ . $ _h... etc "'.�. 19 ORDINANCE NO. h. Gateway landscaping, open space,pedestrian amenities and signage that identifies the commercial area(See RMC 4-3-100.E.6.a.ii) F. PARKING AND VEHICULAR ACCESS: Intent: To provide safe, convenient access to the Urban Center; incorporate various modes of transportation, including public mass transit, in order to reduce traffic volumes and other impacts from vehicles; ensure sufficient parking is provided, while encouraging creativity in reducing the impacts of parking areas; allow an active pedestrian environment by maintaining contiguous street frontages, without parking lot siting along sidewalks and building facades; minimize the visual impact of parking lots; and use access streets and parking to maintain an urban edge to the district. 1. Location of Parking: Intent: To maintain active pedestrian environments along streets by placing parking lots primarily in back of buildings. a. Minimum Standards For Districts 'A' and 'B': No surface parking shall be located between a building and the front property line or the building and side property line on the street side of a corner lot. b. Minimum Standards for District 'C': i. On designated pedestrian-oriented streets: (a) Parking shall be at the side and/or rear of a building, with the exception of on-street parallel parking. No more than sixty(60) feet of the street frontage measured parallel to the curb shall be occupied by off-street parking and vehicular access. 20 ...... ORDINANCE NO. (b) On-street parallel parking spaces located adjacent to the site can be included in calculation of required parking. For parking ratios based on use and zone, see RMC 4-4-080, Parking, Loading and Driveway Regulations. (c) On-street, parallel parking shall be required on both sides of the street. ii. All parking lots located between a building and street or visible from a street shall feature landscaping between the sidewalk and building; see RMC 4-4-080.F, Parking Lot Design Standards. iii. Surface parking lots: The applicant must successfully demonstrate that the surface parking lot is designed to facilitate future structured parking and/or other infill development. For example, an appropriate surface parking area would feature a one-thousand and five-hundred (1,500) foot maximum perimeter area and a minimum dimension on one side of two-hundred (200) feet, unless project proponent can demonstrate future alternative use of the area would be physically possible. Exception: If there are size constraints inherent in the original parcel (see illustration, RMC 4-3-100.F.5.a). c. Guidelines Applicable to All Districts: In areas of mixed-use development, shared parking is recommended. d. Guidelines Applicable to District 'C': i. If a limited number of parking spaces are made available in front of a building for passenger drop-off and pick-up, they should be parallel to the building façade. ii. When fronting on streets not designated as pedestrian-oriented, parking lots should be located on the interior portions of blocks and screened from the surrounding roadways by buildings, landscaping and/or gateway features as dictated by location. 21 ORDINANCE NO. 2. Design of Surface Parking: Intent: To ensure safety of users of parking areas, convenience to businesses, and reduce the impact of parking lots wherever possible. a. Minimum Standards for Districts 'A' and 'C': i. Parking lot lighting shall not spill onto adjacent or abutting properties (see illustration, RMC 4-3-100.F.5.b). ii. All surface parking lots shall be landscaped to reduce their visual impact (see RMC 4-4-080.F.7, Landscape Requirements). b. Guidelines Applicable to All Districts: i. Wherever possible, parking should be configured into small units, connected by landscaped areas to provide on-site buffering from visual impacts. ii. Access to parking modules should be provided by public or private local streets with sidewalks on both sides where possible, rather than internal drive aisles. iii. Where multiple driveways cannot be avoided, provide landscaping to separate and minimize their impact on the streetscape. 3. Structured Parking Garages: Intent: To more efficiently use land needed for vehicle parking; encourage the use of structured parking throughout the Urban Center; physically and visually integrate parking garages with other uses; and reduce the overall impact of parking garages when they are located in proximity to the designated pedestrian environment. a. Minimum Standards for District 'C': i. Parking structures fronting designated pedestrian-oriented streets: 22 ORDINANCE NO. (a) Parking structures shall provide space for ground-floor commercial uses along street frontages at a minimum of seventy-five (75) percent of the frontage width(see illustration, RMC 4-3-100.F.5.c). (b) The entire façade must feature a pedestrian-oriented façade. ii. Parking structures fronting non-pedestrian-oriented streets: (a) Parking structures fronting non-pedestrian-oriented streets and not featuring a pedestrian-oriented façade shall be setback at least six (6) feet from the sidewalk and feature substantial landscaping. This includes a combination of evergreen and deciduous trees, shrubs, and ground cover. This setback shall be increased to ten (10) feet adjacent to high visibility streets. (b) The Director may allow a reduced setback where the applicant can successfully demonstrate that the landscaped area and/or other design treatment meets the intent of these standards and guidelines. Possible treatments to reduce the setback include landscaping components plus one or more of the following integrated with the architectural design of the building: (i) Ornamental grillwork (other than vertical bars); (ii) Decorative artwork; (iii) Display windows; (iv) Brick, tile, or stone; (v) Pre-cast decorative panels; (vi) Vine-covered trellis; 23 ORDINANCE NO. (vii) Raised landscaping beds with decorative materials; or (viii) Other treatments that meet the intent of this standard. (c) Facades shall be articulated architecturally, so as to maintain a human scale and to avoid a solid wall. Vehicular entrances to non-residential or mixed-use parking structures shall be articulated by arches, lintels, masonry trim, or other architectural elements and/or materials (see illustration, RMC 4-3-100.F.5.d). b. Guidelines Applicable to All Districts: Parking garage entries should be designed and sited to complement, not subordinate, the pedestrian entry. If possible, locate the parking entry away from the primary street, to either the side or rear of the building. c. Guidelines Applicable to Districts 'A' and 'C': i. Parking garage entries should not dominate the streetscape. ii. The design of structured parking at finished grade under a building should minimize the apparent width of garage entries. iii. Parking within the building should be enclosed or screened through any combination of walls, decorative grilles, or trellis work with landscaping. iv. Parking garages should be designed to be complementary with adjacent buildings. Use similar forms, materials, and/or details to enhance garages. v. Residential garage parking should be secured with electronic entries. 24 ORDINANCE NO. vi. Parking structure service and storage functions should be located away from the street edge and generally not be visible from the street or sidewalks. d. Guidelines Applicable to District `B': i. Attached personal parking garages at-grade should be individualized and not enclose more than two cars per enclosed space. Such garages should be architecturally integrated into the whole development. ii. Multiple-user parking garages at-grade should be enclosed or screened from view through any combination of walls, decorative grilles, or trellis work with landscaping. iii. All garage parking in this district should be secured with decorative doors. iv. Personal parking garages should be individualized whenever possible with separate entries and architectural detailing in character with the lower density district. v. Large multi-user parking garages are discouraged in this lower density district and, if provided, should be located below grade whenever possible. vi. Service and storage functions should be located away from the street edge and generally not be visible from the street or sidewalks. 4. Vehicular Access: Intent: To maintain a contiguous, uninterrupted sidewalk by minimizing, consolidating and/or eliminating vehicular access off streets within pedestrian environments and/or designated pedestrian-oriented streets. a. Minimum Standards for District `B': 25 ORDINANCE NO. Parking lots and garages shall be accessed from alleys when available. b. Minimum Standards for District 'C': i. Parking garages shall be accessed at the rear of buildings or from non-pedestrian-oriented streets when available. ii. Surface parking driveways are prohibited on pedestrian-oriented streets. iii. Parking lot entrances, driveways, and other vehicular access points on high visibility streets shall be restricted to one entrance and exit lane per five hundred (500) linear feet as measured horizontally along the street. c. Guidelines Applicable to District 'A': i. Parking lots and garages should be accessed from alleys or side streets. ii. Driveways should be located to be visible from the right-of-way, but not impede pedestrian circulation on-site or to adjoining properties. Where possible, minimize the number of driveways and curb cuts. d. Guidelines Applicable to Area 'B': i. Garage entryways and/or driveways accessible only from a street should not impede pedestrian circulation along the sidewalk. ii. Curb cuts should be minimized whenever possible through the use of shared driveways. 5. Illustrations 26 ORDINANCE NO. ::;'=.:::::::°.v... ." 3 15, Pxdn3 yob ma xuE b Re nl 4M'roo t\ ' '�snwn Pix /' ..°"'raar �ea. .. ., x:nac�r-_ �� t:: Ac--. i .), _,,,, .. „ / ,,, 3 _ 3.3., . ...,, ,,,,.. , ,..;., 3,„ , , , , , , , „37331ags or urll„u31.„u VeK*Mn.v:n4a 9ree1 nrege,.nranrs a. Parking and vehicular access in District "C" (See RMC 4-3-100.F.1.b.iii) _I c,rrgs1 -C DO THIS vwoen+l I ISI - ` DON'T DO THIS b. Parking lot lighting(See RMC 4-3-100.F.2.a.i) ]) Parking garage on second floor 11111 n c. 4 '•11 KiWitiiiii st'\'' 44 r tii ,..trt,:• J" toil ...e i‘.1 i _____ 1 }1;) i 1-1.N b:li\rt{. il\Iii‘i. f,1 —44 '-' /l4�d1 P. s�,/R�:' C17— : • Ground floor commercial space s t 5.r` 1)'4,/74,///1/ with pedestrian-oriented facade c. Parking structure fronting on pedestrian-oriented street with pedestrian-oriented uses and facades along the ground floor(See RMC 4-3-100.F.3.a.i(a)) 27 ORDINANCE NO. Articulation of- - --- facade _ facade components iTil to reduce scale �4 �' . 4 ! and add visual ;,f(I tr1 �; r- Interest c1 !I -i Yt ,, 4• �� ililll ' I'a�.%%% 7i. l I{ 1 ►�;r-3. 1 1i it, r' Decorative trellis — - t _, I 1r i♦. ,. - structure for vines 11 I Z t - a!. . j t, 44V „I Raised planting �i�---_ , _,*--.4',.,Ali. _ d bed adjacent to ' i •y,�', 9.1.E.0 .. 0 _` _' "_),.. sidewalk '�' i`'+!� d. Parking structure designed to enhance streetscape (See RMC 4-3-100.F.3.a.ii(c)) G. PEDESTRIAN ENVIRONMENT: Intent: To enhance the urban character of development in the Urban Center by creating pedestrian networks and by providing strong links from streets and drives to building entrances; make the pedestrian environment safer and more convenient, comfortable, and pleasant to walk between businesses, on sidewalks, to and from access points, and through parking lots; and promote the use of multi-modal and public transportation systems in order to reduce other vehicular traffic. 1. Pathways through Parking Lots: Intent: To provide safe and attractive pedestrian connections to buildings, parking garages, and parking lots. a. Minimum Standards for District 'C': i. Clearly delineated pedestrian pathways and/or private streets shall be provided throughout parking areas. 28 ORDINANCE NO. ii. Within parking areas, pedestrian pathways shall be provided perpendicular to the applicable building façade, at a maximum distance of one hundred and fifty (150) feet apart (see illustration, RMC 4-3-100.G.4.a). 2. Pedestrian Circulation: Intent: To create a network of linkages for pedestrians to improve safety and convenience and enhance the pedestrian environment. a. Minimum Standards for Districts A and C: i. Developments shall include an integrated pedestrian circulation system that connects buildings, open space, and parking areas with the adjacent street sidewalk system and adjacent properties (see illustration, RMC 4-3- 100.G.4.b). ii. Sidewalks located between buildings and streets shall be raised above the level of vehicular travel. iii. Pedestrian pathways within parking lots or parking modules shall be differentiated by material or texture from adjacent paving materials (see illustration, RMC 4- 3-100.G.4.c). iv. Sidewalks and pathways along the façades of buildings shall be of sufficient width to accommodate anticipated numbers of users. Specifically: (a) Sidewalks and pathways along the façades of mixed-use and retail buildings one hundred (100) or more feet in width (measured along the façade) shall provide sidewalks at least twelve (12) feet in width. The walkway shall include an eight(8) foot minimum unobstructed walking surface and street trees (see illustration, RMC 4-3-100.G.4.d). 29 ORDINANCE NO. (b) To increase business visibility and accessibility, breaks in the tree coverage adjacent to major building entries shall be allowed. (c) For all other interior pathways, the proposed walkway shall be of sufficient width to accommodate the anticipated number of users. A ten to twelve (10-12) foot pathway, for example, can accommodate groups of persons walking four abreast, or two couples passing one another. An eight(8) foot pathway will accommodate three individuals walking abreast, whereas a smaller five to six (5-6) foot pathway will accommodate two individuals. v. Locate pathways with clear sight lines to increase safety. Landscaping shall not obstruct visibility of walkway or sight lines to building entries. vi. All pedestrian walkways shall provide an all-weather walking surface unless the applicant can demonstrate that the proposed surface is appropriate for the anticipated number of users and complementary to the design of the development b. Guidelines Applicable to All Districts: i. Delineation of pathways may be through the use of architectural features, such as trellises, railings, low seat walls, or similar treatment. ii. Mid-block connections are desirable where a strong linkage between uses can be established. iii. Fences, with the exception of chain link fences, may be allowed when appropriate to the situation. c. Guidelines Applicable to District 'C' Only: 30 ORDINANCE NO. i. Through-block connections, should be made between buildings, between streets, and to connect sidewalks with public spaces. Preferred location for through- block connections is mid-block (see illustration, RMC 4-3-100.G.4.e). ii. Between buildings of up to and including two (2) stories in height, through-block connections should be at least six (6) feet in width. iii. Between buildings three (3) stories in height or greater, through-block connections should be at least twelve (12) feet in width. iv. Transit stops should be located along designated transit routes a maximum of one-quarter mile apart. v. As an alternative to some of the required street trees, developments may provide pedestrian-scaled light fixtures at appropriate spacing and no taller than fourteen (14) feet in height. No less than one (1) tree or light fixture per sixty(60) lineal feet of the required walkway should be provided. 3. Pedestrian Amenities: Intent: To create attractive spaces that unify the building and street environments and are inviting and comfortable for pedestrians; and provide publicly accessible areas that function for a variety of activities, at all times of the year, and under typical seasonal weather conditions. a. Minimum Standards for District 'C': i. On designated pedestrian-oriented streets, provide pedestrian overhead weather protection in the form of awnings, marquees, canopies, or building overhangs. These elements shall be a minimum of four and one-half(4-1/2) feet wide along at least 75% of the length of the building facade facing the designated pedestrian-oriented street, a maximum 31 ORDINANCE NO. height of fifteen (15) feet above the ground elevation, and no lower than eight (8) feet above ground level. ii. Site furniture provided in public spaces shall be made of durable, vandal- and weather-resistant materials that do not retain rainwater and can be reasonably maintained over an extended period of time. iii. Site furniture and amentities shall not impede or block pedestrian access to public spaces or building entrances. b. Guidelines Applicable to District 'C': i. Transit shelters, bicycle racks, benches, trash receptacles, and other street furniture should be provided. ii. Street amenities such as outdoor group seating, kiosks, fountains, and public art should be provided. iii. Architectural elements that incorporate plants, such as façade-mounted planting boxes or trellises or ground-related or hanging containers are encouraged, particularly at building entrances, in publicly accessible spaces, and at façades along pedestrian-oriented streets (see illustration, RMC 4-3-100.G.4.f). 4. Illustrations I , 150'MAX r Pedestrian z / walkways / sit\ :i ttiN 32 ORDINANCE NO. a. Pedestrian walkways within parking lots (See RMC 4-3-100.G.1.a.ii) —.....c........, ,.. .. hflt= IS 5 ma..mNgall.. e7 : e. ani... .,•., . ' aro`' '1 j , #> ,,( \ 414* b. Integrated pedestrian access system (pathways are shown in solid black lines) (See RMC 4-3-100.G.2.a.i) I ,I T , I _ - ^�Iy t '' 4�vy' .1 tog �'� '4rrN��r 21 VI -------i"""---3-61'w„1:4';j�,�k'�� ice- r.-� --- 44a:1-It +.UI a c. Parking lot pedestrian interior walkway (RMC 4-3-100.G.2.a.iii) 33 ORDINANCE NO. Street trees and/or pedestrian street lamps every 30'-1 Weather 1, protection ¢ } ir.:ieida r 7 _ A t^p Fl _ ,' 'L 'krj ,'M1` .i..$jc,a. 8'min unobstruded vndth 12'min Total sidewalk width d. Sidewalks along retail building facade (RMC 4-3-100.G.2.a.iv(a)) `-----,----5-- ,z/ ,..,---- _,,,T/ ptoPbahedtt� 7 --,.---„c".:—___—___ / _`� / l / / =Y / // \g y f/ 4rrrr■P/ed■esrtriranColnrdolrr ' a4rePrerderstrrarCroadrorrr®. ' a r ) i e. Through-block pedestrian connections (See RMC 4-3-100.G.2.c) 34 ORDINANCE NO. Recessed entry Seasonal landscaping Transparent windows Weather protection � �� ;/ Pedestrian "'jam. 1y oriented lltli �1`�., �r��LTr� '�� space 1111 �'s v\' ti r rw �� 111.11- 11------'0.=:'-- 60� ~�_1�.,• Seating Ii" � areas l,I Trees and �1��'_�_1 lI ,T --- • street _�:. LJ t�� t �f features L ii11i�I�1I111 "r� udefito ne 114 .. - 1 FUDGE I I1 j `' O �,�%'�li. pedestrian■ '" y� �./r'rul .1110r2 area it r1 � �.� _,/ -_ ihid Varied pavement Pedestrian z oriented ` kr signage f. Pedestrian amenities incorporated into development (See RMC 4-3-100.G.3.b.iii) H. LANDSCAPING/RECREATION AREAS/COMMON OPEN SPACE: Intent: To provide visual relief in areas of expansive paving or structures; define logical areas of pedestrian and vehicular circulation; and add to the aesthetic enjoyment of the area by the community. To have areas suitable for both passive and active recreation by residents, workers, and visitors; provide these areas in sufficient amounts and in convenient locations; and provide the opportunity for community gathering in places centrally located and designed to encourage such activity. 1. Landscaping: Intent: Landscaping is intended to reinforce the architecture or concept of the area; provide visual and climatic relief in areas of expansive paving or structures; channelize and define logical areas of pedestrian and vehicular circulation; and add to the aesthetic enjoyment of the area by the community. a. Minimum Standards for All Districts: i. All pervious areas shall be landscaped (see 4-4-070, Landscaping). 35 ORDINANCE NO. ii. Street trees are required and shall be located between the curb edge and building, as determined by the City of Renton. iii. On designated pedestrian-oriented streets, street trees shall be installed with tree grates. For all other streets, street tree treatment shall be as determined by the City of Renton (see illustration, RMC 4-3-100.H.3.a). iv. The proposed landscaping shall be consistent with the design intent and program of the building, the site, and use. v. The landscape plan shall demonstrate how the proposed landscaping, through the use of plant material and non-vegetative elements, reinforces the architecture or concept of the development. vi. Surface parking areas shall be screened by landscaping in order to reduce views of parked cars from streets (see RMC 4-4-080.F.7, Landscaping Requirements). Such landscaping shall be at least ten (10) feet in width as measured from the sidewalk (see illustration, RMC 4-3-100.H.3.b). Standards for planting shall be as follows: (a) Trees at an average minimum rate of one (1)tree per thirty (30) lineal feet of street frontage. Permitted tree species are those that reach a mature height of at least thirty-five (35) feet. Minimum height or caliper at planting shall be eight(8) feet or two (2) inch caliper(as measured four(4) feet from the top of the root ball) respectively. (b) Shrubs at the minimum rate of one (1) per twenty(20) square feet of landscaped area. Shrubs shall be at least twelve (12) inches tall at planting and have a mature height between three (3) and four(4) feet. 36 ORDINANCE NO. (c) Groundcover shall be planted in sufficient quantities to provide at least ninety(90)percent coverage of the landscaped area within three years of installation. (d) The applicant shall provide a maintenance assurance device, prior to occupancy, for a period of not less than three (3) years and in sufficient amount to ensure required landscape standards have been met by the third year following installation. (e) Surface parking with more than fourteen (14) stalls shall be landscaped as follows: (i) Required amount: Total Number of Spaces Minimum Required Landscape Area* 15 to 50 15 square feet/parking space 51 to 99 25 square feet/parking space 100 or more 35 square feet/parking space * Landscape area calculations above and planting requirements below exclude perimeter parking lot landscaping areas. (ii) Provide trees, shrubs, and groundcover in the required interior parking lot landscape areas. (iii) Plant at least one (1) tree for every six parking spaces. Permitted tree species are those that reach a mature height of at least thirty-five (35) feet. Minimum height or caliper at planting shall be eight(8) feet or two (2) inch caliper(as measured four(4) feet from the top of the root ball) respectively. 37 ORDINANCE NO. (iv) Plant shrubs at a rate of five per 100 square feet of landscape area. Shrubs shall be at least sixteen (16) inches tall at planting and have a mature height between three (3) and four(4) feet. (v) Up to fifty(50) percent of shrubs may be deciduous. (vi) Select and plant groundcover so as to provide ninety(90) percent coverage within three years of planting, provided that mulch is applied until plant coverage is complete. (vii) Do not locate a parking stall more than fifty(50) feet from a landscape area. vii. Regular maintenance shall be provided to ensure that plant materials are kept healthy and that dead or dying plant materials are replaced. viii. Underground, automatic irrigation systems are required in all landscape areas. b. Guidelines Applicable to all Districts: i. Landscaping should be used to soften and integrate the bulk of buildings. ii. Landscaping should be provided that appropriately provides either screening of unwanted views or focuses attention to preferred views. iii. Use of low maintenance, drought-resistant landscape material is encouraged. iv. Choice of materials should reflect the level of maintenance that will be available. 38 ORDINANCE NO. v. Seasonal landscaping and container plantings are encouraged, particularly at building entries and in publicly accessible spaces. vi. Window boxes, containers for plantings, hanging baskets, or other planting feature elements should be made of weather resistant materials that can be reasonably maintained. vii. Landscaping should be used to screen parking lots from adjacent or neighboring properties. c. Guidelines Applicable to District 'B': i. Front yards should be visible from the street and visually contribute to the streetscape. ii. Decorative walls and fencing are encouraged when architecturally integrated into the project. 2. Recreation Areas and Common Open Space: Intent: To ensure that districts have areas suitable for both passive and active recreation by residents, workers, and visitors and that these areas are of sufficient size for the intended activity and in convenient locations; create usable, accessible, and inviting open space that is accessible to the public; and promote pedestrian activity on pedestrian- oriented streets—particularly at street corners. a. Minimum Standards for Districts 'A' and 'C': i. Mixed-use residential and attached housing developments of ten (10) or more dwelling units shall provide a minimum area of common space or recreation area equal to fifty(50) square feet per unit. The common space area shall be aggregated to provide usable area(s) for residents. The location, layout, and proposed 39 W ORDINANCE NO. type of common space or recreation area shall be subject to approval by the Director. The required common open space shall be satisfied with one or more of the elements listed below. The Director may require more than one of the following elements for developments having more than one hundred (100) units. (a) Courtyards, plazas, or multipurpose open spaces; (b) Upper level common decks, patios, terraces, or roof gardens. Such spaces above the street level must feature views or amenities that are unique to the site and are provided as an asset to the development. (c) Pedestrian corridors dedicated to passive recreation and separate from the public street system; (d) Recreation facilities including, but not limited to tennis/sports courts, swimming pools, exercise areas, game rooms, or other similar facilities; or (e) Children's play spaces. iii. In mixed-use residential and attached residential projects, required landscaping, driveways, parking, or other vehicular use areas shall not be counted toward the common space requirement or be located in dedicated outdoor recreation or common use areas. iv. In mixed-use residential and attached residential projects required yard setback areas shall not count toward outdoor recreation and common space unless such areas are developed as private or semi-private(from abutting or adjacent properties) courtyards, plazas or passive use areas containing landscaping and fencing sufficient to create a fully usable area accessible to all residents of the development (see illustration, RMC 4-3-100.H.3.c). v. Private decks,balconies, and private ground floor open space shall not count toward the common space/recreation area requirement. 40 ORDINANCE NO. vi. In mixed-use residential and attached residential projects other required landscaping, and sensitive area buffers without common access links, such as pedestrian trails, shall not be included toward the required recreation and common space requirement. vii. All buildings and developments with over 30,000 square feet of non-residental uses (excludes parking garage floorplate areas) shall provide pedestrian-oriented space (see illustration, RMC 4-3-100.H.3.d) according to the following formula: 1% of the lot area+ 1% of the building area=Minimum amount of pedestrian- oriented space viii. To qualify as pedestrian-oriented space, the following must be included: (a) Visual and pedestrian access (including barrier-free access) to the abutting structures from the public right-of-way or a nonvehicular courtyard, (b) Paved walking surfaces of either concrete or approved unit paving, (c) On-site or building-mounted lighting providing at least four (4) foot-candles (average) on the ground, and (d) At least three feet of seating area(bench, ledge, etc) or one individual seat per sixty(60) square feet of plaza area or open space. ix. The following features are encouraged in pedestrian-oriented space (see illustration, RMC 4-3-100.H.3.e) and may be required by the Director: (a) Provide pedestrian-oriented uses on the building facade facing the pedestrian-oriented space. 41 ORDINANCE NO. (b) Spaces should be positioned in areas with significant pedestrian traffic to provide interest and security— such as adjacent to a building entry. (c) Provide pedestrian-oriented facades on some or all buildings facing the space. (d) Provide movable public seating. x. The following are prohibited within pedestrian-oriented space: (a) Adjacent unscreened parking lots; (b) Adjacent chain link fences; (c) Adjacent blank walls; (d) Adjacent dumpsters or service areas; and (e) Outdoor storage(shopping carts, potting soil bags, firewood, etc.) that do not contribute to the pedestrian environment. xi. The minimum required walkway areas shall not count as pedestrian-oriented space. However, where walkways are widened or enhanced beyond minimum requirements, the area may count as pedestrian-oriented space if the Director determines such space meets the definition of pedestrian-oriented space. b. Minimum Standards for District 'B': Attached housing developments shall provide a minimum area of private usable open space equal to one hundred fifty(150) square feet per unit of which one hundred (100) square feet are contiguous. Such space may include porches, balconies, yards, and decks. c. Minimum Standards for District 'C': 42 ORDINANCE NO. The location of public open space shall be considered in relation to building orientation, sun and light exposure, and local micro-climatic conditions. d. Guidelines Applicable to Districts 'A' and 'C': i. Common space areas in mixed-use residential and attached residential projects should be centrally located so they are near a majority of dwelling units, accessible and usable to residents, and visible from surrounding units. ii. Common space areas should be located to take advantage of surrounding features such as building entrances, significant landscaping, unique topography or architecture, and solar exposure. iii. In mixed-use residential and attached residential projects children's play space should be centrally located, visible from the dwellings, and away from hazardous areas like garbage dumpsters, drainage facilities, streets, and parking areas. e. Guidelines Applicable to District 'C': Developments located at street intersection corners on designated pedestrian-oriented streets are encouraged to provide pedestrian-oriented space adjacent to the street corner to emphasize pedestrian activity(see illustration, RMC 4-3-100.H.3.f). 3. Illustrations 43 ORDINANCE NO. L f■y"[� , r �y �G XI 1110 IA • r Ss ej 4 a .y r1y� �'4. tuD,,•, t`�=��-•-ice._ L,:;^z w•ii! .�^— \Ypra 'ea' ;,A. '. �� 1/471!yin a. Street tree installed with tree grate(See RMC 4-3-100.H.l.a.iii) One free per 30 lineal feet 4 E Parking, service, or as rt storage areas •�-r_,: UNt�. "i jan-_1 t Landscaping Buffer b. Parking lot landscaped buffer(See RMC 4-3-100.H.l.a.vi) 44 iniumum..... ORDINANCE NO. is- I ,r 1 .4.,.. z to. 4-4-1 g..., ---.7f ,qi. 4,..c.s. .....) ,.... ,•___,L.„._:-.,v---,Iri ,,,,,im e. A -- , i'l. '44'1. 1 _,-.•Li I ' Ill - 2' 11 I • Sti ii: I 411 ...... , ‘.., 4-4-------------____ -- ___ •-l'iy. •_,. o4L'V'z --- --- - , -------: -„,<- - c. Visible Visible and accessible common area featuring landscaping and other amenities (See RIVIC 4-3-100.H.2.a.iv) ,.., / , 3 V ( / 'A '\ 1. •7t, 1 le/ .4, Ar 4 \ 4 ' , ‘,A i ) - Ao -,, •- • 31 44ii- cit. ' //0. , C.! ; i , 1,i , 10) IT71- d. Pedestrian-oriented space associated with a large-scale retail building(See RMC 4-3- 1 00.H.2.a.vii) 45 ORDINANCE NO. —_!! �7-- - j�id %�----------- 4 .,,i. ft-II 14 Ij a,f$11 M4I t.y-rr.�,�il .J �.v.ra;.r,� rid \1\. ..Ufj .- - r� 11111111�1ii,T111 W'r.4 lel 11 Ilk \ I11 tla\ # • . itark-i-VOl'ilerv.i_\:::-_,--s"... - v isciala____ \ e. Pedestrian-oriented spaces, visible from the street, including ample seating areas, movable furniture, special paving, landscaping components and pedestrian-oriented uses (See RMC 4-3-1 00.H.2.a.ix) , I Corner building ci tS Corner entry 1 --`.:-:/"/ ' with increased setback ,------, �� Pedestrian-oriented space f. Building setbacks increased at street corners along pedestrian-oriented streets to encourage provisions for pedestrian-oriented spaces (See RMC 4-3-100.H.2.e). I. BUILDING ARCHITECTURAL DESIGN: Intent: To encourage building design that is unique and urban in character, comfortable on a human scale, and uses appropriate building materials that are suitable 46 ORDINANCE NO. for the Pacific Northwest climate. To discourage standardized franchise retail architecture. 1. Building Character and Massing: Intent: To ensure that buildings are not bland and visually appear to be at a human scale; and ensure that all sides of a building that can be seen by the public are visually interesting. a. Minimum Standards for District 'A': All building facades shall include modulation or articulation at intervals of no more than forty(40) feet. b. Minimum Standards for District 'B': All building facades shall include modulation or articulation at intervals of no more than twenty(20) feet. c. Minimum Standards for District 'C': i. All building facades shall include measures to reduce the apparent scale of the building and add visual interest. Examples include modulation, articulation, defined entrances, and display windows (see illustration, RMC 4-3-100.I.5.a). ii. All buildings shall be articulated with one or more of the following: (a) Defined entry features; (b) Window treatment; (c) Bay windows and/or balconies; (d) Roofline features; or (e) Other features as approved by the Director. 47 ORDINANCE NO. iii. Single purpose residential buildings shall feature building modulation as follows (see illustration, RMC 4-3-100.I.5.b): (a) The maximum width (as measured horizontally along the building's exterior) without building modulation shall be forty(40) feet. (b) The minimum width of modulation shall be fifteen (15) feet. (c) The minimum depth of modulation shall be the greater of six (6) feet or not less than 0.2 multiplied by the height of the structure (finished grade to the top of the wall). d. Guidelines Applicable to Districts 'A' and `B': i. Building facades should be modulated and/or articulated with architectural elements to reduce the apparent size of new buildings, break up long blank walls, add visual interest, and enhance the character of the neighborhood. ii. Articulation, modulation, and their intervals should create a sense of scale important to residential buildings. iii. A variety of modulations and articulations should be employed to add visual interest and to reduce the bulk and scale of large projects. e. Guidelines Applicable to District 'A': Building modulations should be a minimum of two (2) feet in depth and four(4) feet in width. f. Guidelines Applicable to District `B': i. Building modulations should be a minimum of two (2) feet deep, sixteen (16) feet in height, and eight (8) feet in width. 48 ORDINANCE NO. ii. Alternative methods to shape a building such as angled or curved facade elements, off-set planes, wing walls, and terracing will be considered, provided that the intent of this Section is met. g. Guidelines Applicable to District 'C': i. Although streetfront buildings along designated pedestrian- oriented streets should strive to create a uniform street edge, building facades should generally be modulated and/or articulated with architectural elements to reduce the apparent size of new buildings, break up long blank walls, add visual interest, and enhance the character of the neighborhood. ii. Style: Buildings should be urban in character. iii. Buildings greater than one hundred and sixty(160 feet) in length should provide a variety of techniques to reduce the apparent bulk and scale of the façade or provide an additional special design feature such as a clock tower, courtyard, fountain, or public gathering place to add visual interest (see illustration, RMC 4-3-100.I.5.c). 2. Ground-level Details: Intent: To ensure that buildings are visually interesting and reinforce the intended human-scale character of the pedestrian environment; and ensure that all sides of a building within near or distant public view have visual interest. a. Minimum Standards for All Districts: i. Untreated blank walls visible from public streets, sidewalks, or interior pedestrian pathways are prohibited. A wall (including building façades and retaining walls) is considered a blank wall if: 49 ORDINANCE NO. (a) It is a ground floor wall or portion of a ground floor wall over six (6) feet in height, has a horizontal length greater than fifteen (15) feet, and does not include a window, door, building modulation or other architectural detailing; or (b) Any portion of a ground floor wall having a surface area of four hundred (400) square feet or greater and does not include a window, door, building modulation or other architectural detailing. ii. Where blank walls are required or unavoidable, blank walls shall be treated with one or more of the following(see illustration, RMC 4-3-100.I.5.d): (a) A planting bed at least five feet in width containing trees, shrubs, evergreen ground cover, or vines adjacent to the blank wall; (b) Trellis or other vine supports with evergreen climbing vines; (c) Architectural detailing such as reveals, contrasting materials, or other special detailing that meets the intent of this standard; (d) Artwork, such as bas-relief sculpture, mural, or similar; or (e) Seating area with special paving and seasonal planting. iii. Treatment of blank walls shall be proportional to the wall. iv. Provide human-scaled elements such as a lighting fixture, trellis, or other landscape feature along the façade's ground floor. v. Facades on designated pedestrian-oriented streets shall have at least seventy-five (75)percent of the linear frontage of the ground floor façade (as measured on a true elevation facing the designated pedestrian-oriented street) comprised of transparent windows and/or doors. 50 ORDINANCE NO. vi. Other facade window requirements include the following: (a) Building facades must have clear windows with visibility into and out of the building. However, screening may be applied to provide shade and energy efficiency. The minimum amount of light transmittance for windows shall be fifty(50) percent. (b) Display windows shall be designed for frequent change of merchandise, rather than permanent displays. (c) Where windows or storefronts occur, they must principally contain clear glazing. (d) Tinted and dark glass,highly reflective (mirror-type) glass and film are prohibited. b. Guidelines Applicable to Districts 'A' and 'C': i. The primary building entrance should be made visibly prominent by incorporating a minimum of one(1) of the following architectural features from each category listed (see illustration, RMC 4-3-100.I.5.e): (a) Façade features (i) Recess (ii) Overhang (iii) Canopy (iv) Trellis (v) Portico (vi) Porch (vii) Clerestory (b) Doorway features 51 ORDINANCE NO. (i) Transom windows (ii) Glass windows flanking door (iii) Large entry doors (iv) Ornamental lighting (v) Lighted displays (c) Detail features (i) Decorative entry paving (ii) Ornamental building name and address (iii) Planted containers (iv) Street furniture (benches, etc) ii. Artwork or building ornamentation (such as mosaics, murals, grillwork, sculptures, relief, etc.) should be used to provide ground-level detail. iii. Elevated or terraced planting beds between the walkway and long building walls are encouraged. c. Guidelines Applicable to District 'B': Use of material variations such as colors, brick, shingles, stucco, horizontal wood siding, is encouraged. 3. Building Roof Lines: Intent: To ensure that roof forms provide distinctive profiles and interest consistent with an urban project and contribute to the visual continuity of the district. a. Minimum Standards for Districts 'A' and 'C': Buildings shall use at least one of the following elements to create varied and interesting roof profiles (see illustration, RMC 4-3-100.I.5.0: 52 ORDINANCE NO. i. Extended parapets ii. Feature elements projecting above parapets iii. Projected cornices iv. Pitched or sloped roofs (a) Locate and screen roof-mounted mechanical equipment so that the equipment is not visible within one hundred fifty(150) feet of the structure when viewed from ground level. (b) Screening features shall blend with the architectural character of the building, consistent with RMC 4-4-095.E, Roof-Top Equipment. (c) Match color of roof mounted mechanical equipment to color of exposed portions of the roof to minimize visual impacts when equipment is visible from higher elevations. b. Guidelines Applicable to District 'B': i. Buildings containing predominantly residential uses should have pitched roofs with a minimum slope of one to four(1:4). Such roofs should have dormers or intersecting roof forms that break up the massiveness of a continuous, uninterrupted sloping roof. ii. Roof colors should be dark. c. Guidelines Applicable to District 'C': Building roof lines should be varied to add visual interest to the building. 4. Building Materials: Intent: To ensure high standards of quality and effective maintenance over time; encourage the use of materials that reduce the visual bulk of large buildings; and encourage the use of materials that add visual interest to the neighborhood. 53 ORDINANCE NO. a. Minimum Standards for all Districts: i. All sides of buildings visible from a street, pathway, parking area, or open space shall be finished on all sides with the same building materials, detailing, and color scheme, or if different, with materials of the same quality. ii. Materials, individually or in combination, shall have an attractive texture, pattern, and quality of detailing for all visible façades. iii. Materials shall be durable, high quality, and reasonably maintained. b. Minimum Standards for Districts 'A' and 'C': Buildings shall employ material variations such as colors, brick or metal banding, patterns, or textural changes. c. Guidelines Applicable to all Districts: i. Building materials should be attractive, durable, and consistent with more traditional urban development. Appropriate examples would include brick, integrally colored concrete masonry, pre-finished metal, stone, steel, glass, and cast-in-place concrete. ii. Concrete walls should be enhanced by texturing, reveals, snap-tie patterns, coloring with a concrete coating or admixture, or by incorporating embossed or sculpted surfaces, mosaics, or artwork. iii. Concrete block walls should be enhanced with integral color, textured blocks and colored mortar, decorative bond pattern and/or incorporate other masonry materials. 54 ORDINANCE NO. iv. Stucco and similar troweled finishes should be used in combination with other more highly textured finishes or accents. They should not be used at the base of buildings between the finished floor elevation and four(4)feet above. c. Guideline Applicable to District `B': Use of material variations such as colors, brick or metal banding or patterns, or textural changes is encouraged. 5. Illustrations I I I i i o r H❑! ❑ c ❑! ❑ ❑; C __ ❑; ❑ i i I i! :Th ■...11 ;111 ilirt 1:1i II1 1 1 1 INTERVAL i INTERVAL I)1. a. Building modulation and articulation(See RMC 4-3-100.I.1.c.i) Articulated redline In This case• aadaprial conte Wnduns and building surfaces aad nasal nterest and give the (mss' Illi bulking a human scale papab l &nldnIg k'd d=ated' + •♦ 'a goes a dm a nettlem 6 4 $l .j . mmaa•yatne woewaa i AI a ., ,1 ° °11 '0 w QII 111i ri n f ,� Q Ivl'lY ® fir n o � ., lk, 10 ,/ I ' i" i. it i is _ ,, , �. 5 - _;rErahl-4119 ri:I' Illi ' r .:1;IA b. Single purpose residential building featuring building modulation to reduce the scale of the building and add visual interest(See RMC 4-3-100.I.1.c.iii) 55 ORDINANCE NO. i 2Ii1IIII 1li111111 I" ., 1, 444 Al 160 Maximum facade length allowed r = 111111'1,11111111 11111 X 1 11 oJ "' VA & & & ,41 ® ®\ 0 More than 160' Facade is too long N _��I `w W 21 _ I. I II I 11u11 III= _ 160'or less 160or less __ Meets guideline Meets guideline c. Reducing scale of long buildings (See RMC 4-3-100.I.1.g.iii) pat Trellis with vines or other plants AlliiArtwork -0,itt _,,, qty �: .1 9144INS111.,' 444'critifririi, 41::::- '\ 410 t-RNIIVIWN. 17,141.!,AN' _, '.. 00 illt •,945 I 1 C- e Min. wide planting `ma c bed an d materials to cover 50%of wall within 3 years d. Acceptable blank wall treatments (See RMC 4-3-100.I.2.a.ii) 56 ORDINANCE NO. 4'-6"min. 1' / inn E ao RECESS OVERHANG CANOPY d , di TRELLIS PORTICO PORCH e. Building facade features (See RMC 4-3-100.I.2.b.i) Feature elements projecting Extended parapets above •ara•ets .r° •--. . s....,„:,,,,,..... ..,...,... . ------ 1 1 / *, r: 0* \ � ISI •, (. \ \ lii\ 111 ! ! Projected cornices Pitched or slo•ed roofs ///21, / / lit 14,4 --,.'''',„ ).,, //. \V '///k,\ hit Irrs,, iliiii S' L R - L.---' .1r%s,. .A './. \-; i 10.-1%1144, .% 57 ORDINANCE NO. f. Preferred roof forms (See RMC 4-3-100.I.3.a). J. SIGNAGE: Intent: To provide a means of identifying and advertising businesses; provide directional assistance; encourage signs that are both clear and of appropriate scale for the project; encourage quality signage that contributes to the character of the Urban Center; and create color and interest. 1. Minimum Standards for District 'C': a. Signage shall be an integral part of the design approach to the building. b. Corporate logos and signs shall be sized appropriately for their location. c. Prohibited signs include (see illustration, RMC 4-3-100.J.3.a): i. Pole signs. ii. Roof signs. iii. Back-lit signs with letters or graphics on a plastic sheet ("can" signs or"illuminated cabinet" signs). Exceptions: Back-lit logo signs less than ten (10) square feet are permitted as are signs with only the individual letters back-lit. d. In mixed-use and multi-use buildings, signage shall be coordinated with the overall building design. e. Free-standing ground-related monument signs, with the exception of primary entry signs, shall be limited to five (5) feet above finished grade, including support structure. All such signs shall include decorative landscaping(groundcover and/or shrubs) to provide seasonal interest in the area surrounding the sign. Alternately, signage may incorporate stone, brick, or other decorative materials as approved by the Director. f. Entry signs shall be limited to the name of the larger development. 58 ORDINANCE NO. 2. Guidelines Applicable to District 'C': a. Alteration of trademarks notwithstanding, corporate signage should not be garish in color nor overly lit, although creative design, strong accent colors, and interesting surface materials and lighting techniques are encouraged. b. Front-lit, ground-mounted monument signs are the preferred type of freestanding sign. c. "Blade" type signs, proportional to the building façade on which they are mounted, are encouraged on pedestrian-oriented streets. 3. Illustrations Typical "can signs" Internally lit letters are not acceptable or graphics are acceptable BAN K A Plastic or Sheet Only the individual translucent metal letters are lit sheet box a. Acceptable and unacceptable signs (See RMC 4-3-100.J.1.c) K. LIGHTING: Intent: To ensure safety and security; provide adequate lighting levels in pedestrian areas such as plazas, pedestrian walkways, parking areas, building entries, and other public places; and increase the visual attractiveness of the area at all times of the day and night. 1. Minimum Standards for Districts 'A' and 'C': 59 ORDINANCE NO. a. Lighting shall conform to on-site exterior lighting regulations located in RMC 4-4-075, Lighting, Exterior On-Site. b. Lighting shall be provided on site to increase security, but shall not be allowed to directly project off site. c. Pedestrian-scale lighting shall be provided, for both safety and aesthetics, along all streets, at primary and secondary building entrances, at building facades, and in pedestrian-oriented spaces. 2. Guidelines Applicable to District 'C': a. Accent lighting should be provided at focal points such as gateways, public art, and significant landscape features such as specimen trees. b. Additional lighting to provide interest in the pedestrian environment may include sconces on building facades, awnings with down-lighting, decorative street lighting, etc. L. Modification of Minimum Standards: 1. The Director of the Development Services Division shall have the authority to modify the minimum standards of the Design Regulations, subject to the provisions of RMC 4-9- 250.D, Modification Procedures, and the following requirements: a. The project as a whole meets the intent of the minimum standards and guidelines in subsections E, F, G, H, I, J, and K of the Design Regulations; b. The requested modification meets the intent of the applicable design standard; c. The modification will not have a detrimental effect on nearby properties and the City as a whole; d. The deviation manifests high quality design; and 60 ORDINANCE NO. e. The modification will enhance the pedestrian environment on the abutting and/or adjacent streets and/or pathways. 2. Exceptions for Districts A and B : Modifications to the requirements in subsections E2a(i) and E3a(i) of this Section are limited to the following circumstances: a. When the building is oriented to an interior courtyard, and the courtyard has a prominent entry and walkway connecting directly to the public sidewalk; or b. When a building includes an architectural feature that connects the building entry to the public sidewalk; or c. In complexes with several buildings, when the building is oriented to an internal integrated walkway system with prominent connections to the public sidewalk(s). M. VARIANCE (Reserved) N. APPEALS: For appeals of administrative decisions made pursuant to the Design Regulations, see RMC 4-8-110, Appeals. SECTION IX. Section 4-11-010 of Chapter 11, Definitions, of Title IV (Development Regulations) of Ordinance No. 4260 entitled "Code of General Ordinances of the City of Renton, Washington" is hereby amended by adding two references, to read as follows: Active recreation: See Recreation, Active Arterial Street: See Street, Arterial SECTION X. Section 4-11-020 of Chapter 11, Definitions, of Title IV (Development Regulations) of Ordinance No. 4260 entitled "Code of General Ordinances of the City of Renton, Washington" is hereby amended by adding a new definition, to read as follows: 61 ORDINANCE NO. Buffer, Landscape: Landscaped area used to physically separate or screen one use or property from another so as to visually shield or block views, noise, lights, or other potential nuisances. SECTION XI. Section 4-11-030 of Chapter 11, Definitions, of Title IV (Development Regulations) of Ordinance No. 4260 entitled "Code of General Ordinances of the City of Renton, Washington" is hereby amended by adding one new definition and two references, to read as follows: Collector Street: See Street, Collector Common space area (common area, common open space, common space): Land that is designed and intended for common use or enjoyment and may include such structures and improvements as are necessary and appropriate. Corner lot: See Lot Types; Lot, corner SECTION XII. Section 4-11-040 of Chapter 11, Definitions, of Title IV (Development Regulations) of Ordinance No. 4260 entitled "Code of General Ordinances of the City of Renton, Washington" is hereby amended by adding three new definitions, to read as follows: Director: The Director of the Development Services Division of the Planning /Building/Public Works Department of the City of Renton or a designee. Display window: A window in a building facade intended for non-permanent display of goods and merchandise. Drop-off zone: A sidewalk area abutting a street intended for passengers to enter or exit vehicles that are temporarily parked for that purpose. 62 ORDINANCE NO. SECTION XIII. Section 4-11-060 of Chapter 11, Definitions, of Title IV (Development Regulations) of Ordinance No. 4260 entitled "Code of General Ordinances of the City of Renton, Washington" is hereby amended by adding one new definition, to read as follows: Franchise retail architecture (or generic or corporate architecture): Consists of site layout, buildings, and signs for businesses (usually large format, chain, or franchise retail establishments) that are the same style, color, and material regardless of location. Typically, the employees wear uniforms and the products or food are the same in every facility. SECTION XIV. Section 4-11-080 of Chapter 11, Definitions, of Title IV (Development Regulations) of Ordinance No. 4260 entitled "Code of General Ordinances of the City of Renton, Washington" is hereby amended by adding two new definitions, to read as follows: High quality design: A development project that encourages pedestrian activity or adds pedestrian interest and exhibits a degree of craftsmanship, building detailing, architectural design, or quality of materials that are not typically found in standard construction. Responds to site conditions through its orientation, circulation, and/or incorporation of special site features. Buildings characterized by standard corporate identity elements (e.g. fast food establishments with signature roofline or façade features) or standard building plans (e.g. stock plans that are unable to adapt to site conditions) are not typically considered high quality design. Human scale: The perceived size of a building relative to a human being. A building is considered to have good human scale if there is an expression of human activity or use that indicates the building's size. For example, traditionally sized doors, windows, and balconies are 63 ORDINANCE NO. elements that respond to the size of a human body, so these elements in a building indicate a building's overall size. SECTION XV. Section 4-11-090 of Chapter 11, Definitions, of Title IV (Development Regulations) of Ordinance No. 4260 entitled "Code of General Ordinances of the City of Renton, Washington" is hereby amended by adding one new definition, to read as follows: Integrated walkway circulation: Sidewalks and streets constructed and connected in such a way as to provide an efficient and safe system for people moving through an area on foot. SECTION XVI. Section 4-11-130 of Chapter 11, Definitions, of Title IV (Development Regulations) of Ordinance No. 4260 entitled "Code of General Ordinances of the City of Renton, Washington" is hereby amended by adding one new definition, to read as follows: Main Street: A style of urban commercial development featuring concentrated retail and service uses along a street designed for use by both pedestrians and vehicles. SECTION XVII. Section 4-11-140 of Chapter 11, Definitions, of Title IV (Development Regulations) of Ordinance No. 4260 entitled "Code of General Ordinances of the City of Renton, Washington" is hereby amended by adding one new definition, to read as follows: Natural light: Interior or exterior light from the sun. SECTION XVIII. Section 4-11-160 of Chapter 11, Definitions, of Title IV (Development Regulations) of Ordinance No. 4260 entitled "Code of General Ordinances of the City of Renton, Washington" is hereby amended by adding four new definitions and two references, to read as follows: 64 ORDINANCE NO. Parking module: A parking area that meets maximum physical dimensions as delineated in the Urban Center Design Overlay Regulations. Passive recreation: See Recreation, Passive Pedestrian-oriented façade: Ground floor facades featuring characteristics that make them attractive to pedestrians, including transparent window area or window displays along the ground floor façade, primary building entry, and overhead weather protection along at least seventy-five percent (75%) of the façade. Pedestrian-oriented space: A publicly-accessible space that includes elements such as visual and pedestrian access to abutting structures, paved walking surfaces of either concrete or unit paving, on-site or building-mounted lighting, and public seating areas. Pedestrian-oriented street: See Street, Pedestrian-oriented. Pedestrian-oriented use: Businesses typically frequented by and conveniently located for use by pedestrians. SECTION XIX. Section 4-11-180 of Chapter 11, Definitions, of Title IV (Development Regulations) of Ordinance No. 4260 entitled "Code of General Ordinances of the City of Renton, Washington" is hereby amended by adding three new definitions, to read as follows: Recreation, Active: Leisure-time activities sometimes requiring equipment and taking place at prescribed places, sites, or fields. Active recreation includes such activities as swimming, boating, tennis, fishing, soccer, etc. Recreation, Passive: Activities that involve relatively inactive or less energetic activities, such as walking, sitting, reading,picnicking, and card,board, or table games. 65 ORDINANCE NO. SECTION XX. Section 4-11-190 of Chapter 11, Definitions, of Title IV (Development Regulations) of Ordinance No. 4260 entitled "Code of General Ordinances of the City of Renton, Washington" is hereby amended by adding five new definitions, and one reference, to read as follows: Shared parking: Use of a parking area for more than one use. Solar access: Sunlight exposure on land without impairment by other development. Street amenities: See Street furniture Street, Collector: A street classified as a collector street on the City of Renton Arterial Street Plan. Street, Pedestrian-oriented: An area with streets and sidewalks specifically designated as such and intended for use by people walking; with special design and spatial treatment of building frontages; built at human scale; with uses of interest to and functional for people on foot; and designed to hold interest for pedestrians by encouraging walking, browsing, and taking in the scene. "Pedestrian-oriented streets" are so designated in the Urban Center—North (District C). Street furniture: Objects, such as outdoor seating, kiosks, bus shelters, tree grates, trash receptacles, and fountains that have the potential for enlivening and giving variety to streets, sidewalks, plazas, and other outdoor spaces open to, and used by, the public. Street grid pattern, traditional: A system of platting, or of street design, that features parallel and perpendicular streets and intersections of streets at right angles that form short blocks. 66 ORDINANCE NO. SECTION XXI. The definition for"Street, Arterial" of Section 4-11-190 of Chapter 11, Definitions, of Title IV (Development Regulations) of Ordinance No. 4260 entitled "Code of General Ordinances of the City of Renton, Washington" is hereby amended, to read as follows: Street, Arterial: Street intended for higher traffic volume and speed and classified as a principal or minor arterial on the City of Renton Arterial Street Plan. SECTION XXII. Section 4-11-200 of Chapter 11, Definitions, of Title IV (Development Regulations) of Ordinance No. 4260 entitled "Code of General Ordinances of the City of Renton, Washington" is hereby amended by adding a new definition, to read as follows: Transportation system, multi-modal: A system of transportation consisting of various types of conveyances, for example light rail train and bus, or ferry and automobile. SECTION XXIII. Section 4-11-210 of Chapter 11, Definitions, of Title IV (Development Regulations) of Ordinance No. 4260 entitled "Code of General Ordinances of the City of Renton, Washington" is hereby amended by adding three new definitions, to read as follows: Urban character: Attributes such as high residential densities and use intensities in multi-story buildings with small setbacks. Urban edge and urban fringe: The interface between high-density residential/high intensity uses and those that have lower density and intensity and are, therefore, more suburban. The "urban fringe" is the area where the suburban densities and uses become noticeably less intense and more rural. Urban environment: The combination of buildings, structures, and streetscape that, due to their nature, i.e. multi-storied, continuous facade, zero side setbacks, form a neighborhood or section of a city or urban place. 67 ORDINANCE NO. SECTION XXIV. This ordinance shall be effective upon its passage, approval, and 30 days after publication. PASSED BY THE CITY COUNCIL this day of , 2005. Bonnie I. Walton, City Clerk APPROVED BY THE MAYOR this day of , 2005. Kathy Keolker-Wheeler, Mayor Approved as to form: Lawrence J. Warren, City Attorney Date of Publication: ORD.1162:1/10/05:ma 68 4-2-060 ZONING USE TABLE—USES ALLOWED IN ZONING DESIGNATIONS ZONING USE TABLE RESIDENTIAL ZONING DESIGNATIONS INDUSTRIAL COMMERCIAL ZONING DESIGNATIONS USES: RC R-1 R-4 R-8 RMH R-10 R-14 RM IL IM IH CN CV CA CD CO COR UCN-1 UCN-2 - A.AGRICULTURE AND NATURAL RESOD CES Agriculture P P , Natural resource extraction/recovery H H H H H H H H H H59 H H H H H H H B.ANIMALS AND RELATED USES Animal husbandry(20 or fewer smaller P51 P51 P51 P51 P51 animals per acre) , Animal husbandry(4 or fewer medium P51 P51 P51 P51 P51 animals per acre) , Animal husbandry(maximum of 1 P51 P51 P51 P51 P51 large animal per acre) , Greater number of animals than H36 H36 H36 H36 H36 allowed above _ - Beekeeping P35 P35 P35 P35 , Kennels AD37 _ P37 P37 P37 _ Kennels,hobby AC37 AC37_AC37 AC37 AC37 AC37 AC37 AC37 AC37 AC37 AC37 AC37 AC37 AC37 AC37 AC37 Pets,common household,up to 3 per AC AC AC AC AC AC AC AC AC AC AC AC AC AC AC AC AC AC AC > dwelling or business establishment r-I- rr Stables,commercial AD37 AD37 p' n C.RESIDENTIAL Detached dwelling P19 P19 P19 P19 P19 P19 Detached dwelling jexisting legal) P P P Semi-attached dwellingP19 - P19 ri- Attached dwellings P50 P50 P19 P18 P73 P18 ✓P16 P19 P74 P87 Flats or townhouses(existing legal) _ P , P P73 Flats or townhouses,no greater than 2 P P P P P P units total per building(existing legal) Manufactured Homes Manufactured homes P19 Manufacturedttomes,designated P19 P19 P19 P19 P19 P19 P19 ` Mobil homes P19 (Amd.Ord 5018,9-22-2003) D.OTHER RESIDENTIAL,LODGING AND HOME OCCUPATIONS Accessory dwelling unit AD7 . Adult faml_iy home _ P P PP PPP P , P P3 Caretakers residence AC AC AC AC AC AC AC AC Congregate residenceAD , P , P3 Group homes h H H3 Group homes II for 6 or less P P P , P P19 P , P P , - P , P3 P Group homes II for 7 or more P H H H H H H H , P H H3 AD Home occupations AC6 AC6 AC6 AC6 AC6 , AC6 AC6 AC6 , AC6 , AC6 AC6 AC6 AC6 , AC AC Retirement residences H H AD P _ P P3 P39 P P75 P88 Blank=Not Allowed AC=Accessory Use H=Hearing Examiner Conditional Use P=Permitted AD=Administrative Conditional Use #=Condition(s) P#=Permitted(Provided condition can be met) ZONING USE TABLE RESIDENTIAL ZONING DESIGNATIONS INDUSTRIAL COMMERCIAL ZONING DESIGNATIONS USES: RC R-1 R-4 R-8 RMH R-10 R-14 RM IL IM IH CN CV CA CD CO COR UCN-1 UCN-2 Uses may be further restricted by: RMC 4-3-020,Airport Related Height and Use Restriction;RMC 4-3-050C,Aquifer Protection Regulations;RMC 4-3-040C,Uses Permitted In the Automall Improvement Districts;RMC 4-3 090,Shoreline Master Program Requirements E.SCHOOLS K-12 education institution(public or H9 H9 H9 H9 H9 H9 H9 H9 H H H H9 H9 H9 H9 H9 H76 H89 private) K-I2 education institution(public or P9 P9 P9 P9 P9 P9 P9 P9 P9 P9 P9 P9 P9 P9 P9 P9 private),existing , Other higher education institutionP38 P38 P38 P P P P21 P H88 Schools/studios,arts and craftsP P38 P38 P22 P P P Trade or vocational school _ P _ P _ H _ - H H77 F.PARKS Parks,neighborhood P P _ P P P P P P P P P P P P P P P P P _ Parks,regional/community,existing PPPP P PP PPPP P P _ P P PP P P Parks,regional/community,new AD AD AD AD AD _ AD AD AD AD AD AD AD AD AD _ AD AD AD _ P P G.OTHER COMMUNITY AND PUBLIC FACILITIES Community Facilities Cemetery H H H H H _ H H H H H H H H H H H H Religious Institutions H H H H H H , H H H H _ H H H H H H H H H90 Service and social organizations H _ H _ H H _ H H H H _ H - H H H H H H H12 H21 _ H78 H90 Public Facilities City government offices AD `AD AD AD AD AD AD AD AD AD AD _ AD AD AD P AD AD AD90 r>I- City government facilities H H H H H H H H H H H H H H H H H H H90 cr. N Jails,existing municipal _ P p' Secure community transition facilities H71 H71 Other government offices and facilities H H H H H H H H H H H H H H H H H H H90 rt H.OFFICE AND CONFERENCE Conference centersP38 P38 P38 P38 P P P21 P P91 Medical and dental offices P42 P38 P38 P38 AD17 P22 P P P P P P92 Offices,general P42 P13 P13 P13AD17 P22 P P P P P P93 Veterinary offices/clinics _ _ _ P42 P38 P38 P38 - P22 P P P38 P P78 _ I.RETAIL Adult retail useP43 _ P43 P43 P43 P43 P43 P43 Big-box retail _ P72 P72 P72 P72 P79 Drive-in/drive-through,retailAC AC AC AC AC AC AC28 AC78 AC80 Eating and drinking establishments P1 , P1 _ P1 P1 P1 P1 H33 P42 P P , P P22 P22 P P P12 P27 P81 P94 Horticultural nurseries,existing H H H H . H , H H H . H H H H H H H H H H Horticultural nurseries,new H _ Retail sales H33 AD P34 P34 P34 P80 P22 P68 P P54 P21 P82 P95 Retail sales,outdoor P30 P30 P30 P15 P15 P15 Taverns _ _ _ AD P20 AD P21 P82 P99 Vehicle sales,large P P P P41 Vehicle sales,smallP P P P20 (Arid.Ord.5001.2-10-2003) J.ENTERTAINMENT AND RECREATION Entertainment Adult entertainment business P43 P43 P43 _ P43 P43 P43 Card room P52 P52 P52 P52 - • Blank=Not Allowed AC=Accessory Use H=Hearing Examiner Conditional Use ZONING USE TABLE RESIDENTIAL ZONING DESIGNATIONS INDUSTRIAL COMMERCIAL ZONING DESIGNATIONS USES: RC R-1 R4 R-8 RMH R-10 R-14 RM IL IM IH CN CV CA CD CO COR UCN-1 UCN-2 - P=Permitted AD=Administrative Conditional Use #=Condition(s) P#=Permitted(Provided condition can be met) Uses may be further restricted by: RMC 4-3-020,Airport Related Height and Use Restriction;RMC 4-3-050C,Aquifer Protection Regulations;RMC 4-3-040C,Uses Permitted in the Automall Improvement Districts;RMC 4-3 090,Shoreline Master Program Requirements Cultural facilities H H H H H H H H AD AD AD AD AD AD AD AD AD AD AD90 Dance clubs _ P38 P38 P38 AD22 P20 H P38 , H Dance halls _ _ P38 P38 P38 AD22 P20 H P38 H Gaming/gambling facilities,not-for- H38 H29 H38 H2O H38 profit . Movie theaters _ _ P38 P38 P38 P P20 P P12 P83 P94 Sports arenas,auditoriums,exhibition P38 P38 P38 P20 P H84 H96 halls.Wow , Sports arenas,auditoriums,exhibition P P38 P38 AD20 H84 H96 halls,outdoor _ _ _ _ Recreation Golf courses,existing _ P P P P _ _ P Golf courses,new HP H H H H Marinas , P _ P21 H97 Recreational facilities,indoor,existing P33 P38 P38 P38 P22 P P P65 P21 P78 P94 Recreational facilities,indoor,new H > Recreational facilities,outdoor _ _ P33 P32 P32 _ P32 _ H2O _ H38 rt ct K. SERVICES L") PL) Services,General a Bed and breakfast house,accessory AD AD AD AD AD AD AD AD P _ N Bed and breakfast house,professional AD AD AD5 AD P Hotel P38 P38 P38 P22 P20 P P38 P _ P P98 > Motel P38 - P38 P38 P22 P20 _ Off-site services _ P42 P38 P38 P38 P38 On-siteservicesH33 P42 P38 P38 P38 P63 P22 P69 P P54 P21 P78 P99 Drive-In/drive-through service AC62 AC62 AC62 AC , AC , AC ,AC70 AC61 . AC61 AC78 AC80 Vehicle rental,smell P P P AD P20 Vehicle and equipment rental large P38 P29 P29 Day Care Services Adult day care 1 AC _ AC _, AC AC AC- AC AC AC P55 P55 P55 , P22 P22 , P22 _ P . P P P78 P100 Adult day care 11 H H H H H H H33 H AD AD H P22 P22 P22 P . P12 P21 P78 P100 Day care centers H25 H25 H25 _H25 H25 H25 H33 H25_ P54 P54 P54 P22 P22 P22 P P P21 _ P78 P100 Family day care home AC AC _ AC AC AC AC AC AC AC AC AC AC AC AC AC3 AC AC AC AC Healthcare Services Convalescent centers H H , , H H H P22 H P3 P39 AD _AD85 AD101 Medical institutions H H H H _ H H H H H56 H56 H56 H H H H P40 H H H93 L.VEHICLE RELATED ACTIVITIES Body shops __ _ _P31 P31 P31 H31 _ _ Car washes P P P AD2 P22 P22 Express transportation services .P , AD22 AD20 Fuel dealers H59_ P Industrial engine or transmission P31 P31 P31 rebuild Blank=Not Allowed AC=Accessory Use H=Hearing Examiner Conditional Use ZONING USE TABLE RESIDENTIAL ZONING DESIGNATIONS INDUSTRIAL COMMERCIAL ZONING DESIGNATIONS USES: RC R-1 R-4 R-8 RMH R-10 R-14 RM IL IM IH CN CV CA CD CO COR UCN-1 UCN-2 P=Permitted AD=Administrative Conditional Use #=Condition(s) P#=Permitted(Provided condition can be met) Uses may be further restricted by: RMC 4-3-020,Airport Related Height and Use Restriction;RMC 4-3-050C,Aquifer Protection Regulations;RMC 4-3-040C,Uses Permitted in the Automall Improvement Districts;RMC 4-3- 090, -3090,Shoreline Master Program Requirements Parking garage,structured, P P P P22 P20 P3 P P P P102 commercial or public Parking garage,surface,commercial P38 P38 P38 P P20 P3 AD or public _ _ Park and ride,dedicatedP105 P105 P105 P106 P105 P107 P105 P107 Park and ride,shared-use P108 P108 P108 P108 P108 P108 , P P P P P109, P107 P P107 Railroad yards , P Taxi stand , AD , AD Tow truck operation/auto impoundment- H59 P Yard . _ Transit centersH38 H38 H38 H2O P H38 P P103 Truck terminalsP Vehicle fueling stationsP , P P P P P38 Vehicle fueling stations,existing legal P P P AD P P P38 110 _ Vehicle service and repair,large AD P P Vehicle service and repair,small , P P P AD2_, P P _ rt Wrecking yard,auto H59 H _ rt Air Transportation Uses 4. Airplane manufacturing H59 p Airplane manufacturing,accessory AC AC functions Airplane sales and repair P . _ r t. H H38 H38 H2O Helipads,accessory to primary use H H . H97 y Helipads,commercial _ H _ H97 Municpal airports _ - H _ M.STORAGE Hazardous material storage,on-site or H24 H24 H24 off-site,including treatment _ Indoor storage _ P P P +AC11 AC11 AC11 AC11 AC11 AC11 Outdoor storage _ _ P57 P57 P57 AD64 P64 Self-service storage P8 , P58 , P59 P H26 H26 H26 _ Vehicle storageAD38 Warehousing P P _ P _ N.INDUSTRIAL Industrial,General Assembly and/or packaging operations P P P P86 P104 Commercial laundries,existing , P38 P38 P38 P4 Commercial laundries,new • P38 P38 P38 _ Construction/contractor's officeP14 P , P Laboratories: light manufacturingP38 P38 P38 P20 P3 AD54 P P104 Laboratories: research,development P31 P P P20 AD3 AD H P P104 and testing , Manufacturing and fabrication,heavy H59 P67 P23 ZONING USE TABLE RESIDENTIAL ZONING DESIGNATIONS INDUSTRIAL COMMERCIAL ZONING DESIGNATIONS USES: RC R-1 R-4 R-8 RMH R-10 R-14 RM IL IM IH CN CV CA CD CO COR UCN-1 UCN-2 Blank=Not Allowed AC=Accessory Use H=Hearing Examiner Conditional Use P=Permitted AD=Administrative Conditional Use #=Condition(s) P#=Permitted(Provided condition can be met) Uses may be further restricted by: RMC 4-3-020,Airport Related Height and Use Restriction;RMC 4-3-0500,Aquifer Protection Regulations;RMC 4-3-040C,Uses Permitted in the Automall Improvement Districts;RMC 4-3 090,Shoreline Master Program Requirements Manufacturing and fabrication, P67 P87 ` P23 medium _ Manufacturing and fabrication,light p p P P Solid Waste/Recycling Recycling coleiction and processing P14 P38 P38 P38 center Recycling collection stationP P P P P P P p P Sewage disposal and treatment plants _ H59 H Waste recycling and transfer facilities - H59 P O.UTILITIES Communication broadcast and relay H H H H H H H H H38 H29 H38 H H H H H H towers _ Electrical power generation and H H66 . H66 H66 H66 H66 H66 H66 H66 H66 > cogenerationrt rt Utilities,small P P P P P P P33 P P P P P P _ pp p P P p 11) Utilities,medium AD AD AD AD AD AD AD AD AD AD AD AD AD AD AD AD v AD AD AD 0 u' Utilities,large H H H _ H H H H H H _ H H _ H H H H _ H _ H _ H H P.WIRELESS COMMUNICATION FACILITIES � lD Lattice towers support structures H48 AD47 AD47 AD47 H48 _ H48 AD47 H48 AD47 H48 rt Macro facility antennas AD46 AD46 AD46 AD46 AD46 AD46 AD46 P44 P44 P44 _ P44 P44 P44 P44 P44 P44 P44 H H Micro facilillty antennas P P P P . P PP P P P P P P P PP P AD AD _ > Mini facility antennas P44 P44 P44 P44 P44 P44 P44 P44 P44 P44 P44_ P44 P44 P44 P44 P44 P44 P P Minor modifications to existing wireless P49 P49 P49 P49 P49 P49 P49 P49 P49 P49 P49 P49 P49 P49 P49 P49 P49 P P communication facilities _ Monopole I support structures H45 H45 H45 H45 H45 H45 H45 AD46 P44 P44 P44 AD46 P44 P44 AD46 P44 AD46 Monopole II support structures H48 AD47 AD47 AD47 H48 H48 AD47 H48 AD47 H48 - Q.GENERAL ACCESSORY USES Accessory uses per RMC 4-2-050 and AC AC AC AC AC . AC AC AC AC AC AC AC AC AC AC AC AC AC AC as defined in Chapter 4-11 RMC, where not otherwise listed In Use Table _ R.TEMPORARY USES Model homes in an approved P53 P53 P53 P53 P53 P53 P53 P53 P53 P53 P53 P53 residential development:one model home on an existing lot _ Sales/marketing trailers,on-site P53 P53 P53 P53 P53 P53 P53 P53 P53 P53 P53 P53 P53 P53 P53 P53 P53 P10 P10 Temporary or manufactured buildings P10 P10 P10 P10 P10 P10 P10 P10 P10 P10 P10 P10 P10 P10 P10 P10 P10 P10 P10 used for construction _ Temporary uses P53 P53 P53 P53 P53 _ P53 P53 _ P53 P53 P53 P53 P53 _ P53 P53 P53 _ P53 P53 P53 P53 Blank=Not Allowed AC=Accessory Use H=Hearing Examiner Conditional Use P=Permitted AD=Administrative Conditional Use #=Condition(s) P#=Permitted(Provided condition can be met) ZONING USE TABLE RESIDENTIAL ZONING DESIGNATIONS INDUSTRIAL COMMERCIAL ZONING DESIGNATIONS USES: RC R-1 R-4 R-8 RMH R-10 R-14 RM IL IM IH CN CV CA CD CO COR UCN-1 UCN-2 Uses may be further restricted by: RMC 4-3-020,Airport Related Height and Use Restriction;RMC 4-3-050C,Aquifer Protection Regulations;RMC 4-3-040C,Uses Permitted in the Automall Improvement Districts;RMC 4-3. 090,Shoreline Master Program Requirements (Ord.4736,8-241998;Ord.4773,3-22-1999;Ord.4777,4-19-1999;Ord.4786,7-12-1999;Ord.4802,10-25-1999;Ord 4803,10-25-1999;Ord 4827,1-24-2000;Ord 4840,5-8-2000;Ord 4857,8-21-2000;Ord.4915,8-27-2001;Ord.4917,9-17-2001;Amd.Ord.4963,5-13-2002;Ord.4971,6-10-2002;Ord.4982,9-23-2002;Ord.4999,1-13-2003;Ord 5027,11-24-2003) ri- rr A., n rn � (D rt ATTACHMENT B' 4-2-070K COMMERCIAL ARTERIAL(CA) Uses allowed in the CA Zone are as follows: USES: TYPE: RETAIL Adult retail use P#43 Big-box retail P#72 Drive-in/drive-through, retail AC Eating and drinking establishments P Horticultural nurseries H Retail sales P#34 Retail sales, outdoor P#30 Taverns P Vehicle sales, large P Vehicle sales,small P 4-2-070N CENTER OFFICE RESIDENTIAL(COR) Uses allowed in the COR Zone are as follows: USES: I TYPE: RETAIL Eating and drinking establishments P#27 Horticultural nurseries H Retail sales P#21 Taverns P#21 4-2-0700 INDUSTRIAL LIGHT(IL) Uses allowed in the IL Zone are as follows: USES: I TYPE: RETAIL Adult retail use P#43 Big-box retail P#72 Drive-in/drive-through, retail AC Eating and drinking establishments P Horticultural nurseries H Retail sales P#34 Retail sales, outdoor P#30 Vehicle sales, large Vehicle sales,small P c:%windows\templdesign guidelines 070 tables.doc 4-2-070P INDUSTRIAL MEDIUM (IM) Attachment B Uses allowed in the IM Zone are as follows: USES: TYPE: RETAIL Adult retail use P#43 Big-box retail P#72 Drive-in/drive-through, retail AC Eating and drinking establishments P Horticultural nurseries H Retail sales P#34 Retail sales, outdoor P#30 Vehicle sales, large P Vehicle sales, small P 4-2-070Q INDUSTRIAL HEAVY(IH) Uses allowed in the IH Zone are as follows: USES: I TYPE: RETAIL Adult retail use P Big-box retail P#72 Drive-in/drive-through, retail AC Eating and drinking establishments P Horticultural nurseries H Retail sales P#34 Retail sales, outdoor P#30 Vehicle sales, large P Vehicle sales,small P c:\windows\temrAdesign guidelines 070 tables.doc 2