Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutECF_DraftEIS_Vol2_RentonSunsetArea-PA.pdfSUNSET AREA COMMUNITY PLANNED ACTION DRAFT NEPA/SEPA ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT • VOLUME 2 • DECEMBER 2010 Issued by: City of Renton NEPA Responsible Entity and SEPA Lead Agency Prepared in partnership with: Renton Housing Authority     Appendices  Sunset Area Community Planned Action EIS  Contents    A Scoping Materials and Responsiveness Summary  B Land Capacity Analysis  C Draft Planned Action Ordinance  D Environmental Health: EDR Report  E Comprehensive Plan Goals, Objectives, and Policies   F Transportation Data and Analysis  G Parks and Recreation Level of Service Calculations  H Greenhouse Gas Calculations  I Public Health in Land Use Planning & Community Design, Sunset Area Community Planned  Action  J Sunset Terrace Redevelopment Subarea and NE Sunset Boulevard Cultural Resources Survey  Report    Appendix A Scoping Materials and Responsiveness Summary   SUMMARY OF THE SCOPING PROCESS  SUNSET AREA COMMUNITY   ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT   P REPARED FOR:  City of Renton  NEPA Responsible Entity and SEPA Lead Agency  Department of Community and Economic Development  1055 S. Grady Way  Renton, WA 98057    In partnership with    Renton Housing Authority  2900 Northeast 10th Street  Renton, Washington 98056  P REPARED BY:  ICF International  EIS Lead  Contact: Lisa Grueter  206‐801‐2816    In conjunction with:    CH2MHill  Project Manager  Contact: Roger Mason  425‐453‐5000  November 2010      ICF International and CH2MHill. 2010. Summary of the Scoping Process: Sunset Area Community  Environmental Impact Statement. November. (ICF 00593.10.) Seattle, WA. Prepared for City of  Renton and Renton Housing Authority, Renton, WA.      Summary of the Scoping Process i November 2010 ICF [Click and type job number]   Contents  Scoping Summary ................................................................................................................................ 1  Introduction ............................................................................................................................................ 1  Public Scoping Process ........................................................................................................................... 1  Public Open House ........................................................................................................................... 2  Comments Received At Open House Question & Answer ............................................................... 3  Written Comments .......................................................................................................................... 5    Attachment A – Scoping Notices and Scoping Document  Attachment B – Scoping Meeting Materials  Attachment C – USEPA Comment Letter        Summary of the Scoping Process 1 November 2010 ICF 00593.10     Summary of the Scoping Process  Introduction  The proposal is to redevelop the Sunset Terrace public housing community as part of a Planned  Action that would encourage redevelopment in the broader Planned Action Study Area through land  use growth allowances, public service and infrastructure improvements, and a streamlined  environmental review process via adoption of a Planned Action Ordinance.  Consistent with the State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA) and the National Environmental Policy  Act (NEPA), the City of Renton solicited comments on the scope of the Sunset Area Community  Environmental Impact Statement.  The purpose of this document is to provide a summary of the  comments received and how they are planned to be addressed in the EIS.  Public Scoping Process  The City of Renton initiated a formal, public EIS scoping process that occurred from August 13, 2010  to October 18, 2010.  The process includes:  z A Determination of Significance and Request for Comments on the EIS scope was published on  August 13, 2010 in the Renton Reporter and by direct mail to agencies, notifying the public and  agencies of the joint SEPA/NEPA EIS. This notice established a written comment period through  September 13, 2010.    z A public scoping meeting was held at the Highlands Neighborhood Center on September 1, 2010,  where oral and written comments were solicited.  The meeting was advertised in the  Determination of Significance and Request for Comments described above, as well an interested  parties mailing list that includes residents, business owners, agency partners, and other  interested stakeholders, postcards mailed to 3,700 property owners, residents, and businesses,  and posters hung in the neighborhood.1   z Last, consistent with HUD NEPA rules, a Notice of Intent to prepare a Draft EIS for the Sunset  Area Community was published in the Federal Register, establishing a 30‐day written comment  period regarding the scope and contents of the Draft EIS; this federal comment period opened  on September 17 and closed on October 18, 2010.    Copies of the notices and advertisements are provided in Attachment A. Comments received during  the scoping period were considered by the City of Renton and Renton Housing Authority in  determining the issues and alternatives to be analyzed in the Draft EIS.                                                                1 Postcards were mailed to 2,500 property owners (included properties within 300 feet of the study area) and  about 1,200 resident households in the study area.  City of Renton  Sunset Area Community EIS    Summary of the Scoping Process 2 November 2010 ICF 00593.10   Public Open House  A public open house was held on September 1, 2010 in the Highlands Community Center as a way of  collecting public feedback on the scope of the EIS.  The open house format included a presentation  on the proposal and anticipated scope of the EIS, a question and answer session, and time for the  public to visit stations set up to describe various aspects of the project.  Approximately 17 interested  residents or business owners attended.    Meeting materials were provided at a sign‐in station, and included:  z Comment Form    z Scoping Document    z Presentation (English)    z Presentation (Spanish)    z Matrix of Alternatives  These materials are included in Attachment B.  Open house stations were available for one‐on‐one conversations with members of the public and  were staffed by city, RHA, and consultant staff included:  z Neighborhood:  covering the Sunset Study Area as a whole, the framework of the alternatives  being discussed, subareas within the neighborhood, and features within each subarea.  z Sunset Terrace:  covering goals and conceptual drawings specific to the Sunset Terrace subarea  within the larger Sunset Study Area.   z SR 900:  covering cross‐sections of the SR 900 (Sunset Boulevard) corridor at various places  within the Sunset Planned Action Study Area.  z Drainage:  covering a variety of green drainage options for inclusion within alternatives beings  studied in the EIS.  After a general open house period, City and Renton Housing Authority (RHA) staff welcomed  participants and invited them to a presentation given by the consultant team addressing:  z Purpose of the meeting  z What is an EIS/What is scoping?  z What is a planned action? (describe what a planned action does and why the public should  comment during scoping)  z What are the proposals? (for both Sunset Terrace and the larger Planned Action Study Area)  z Where did the proposals come from? (City of Renton Sunset Area Community Investment  Strategy)  z What topics will the EIS study?  z What are the potential alternatives? (This presentation describe the three alternatives)  z What is the schedule?  z How can citizens provide comment?  City of Renton  Sunset Area Community EIS    Summary of the Scoping Process 3 November 2010 ICF 00593.10   City, RHA, and consultant staff responded to questions.  Comments Received At Open House Question & Answer  The public was invited to provide questions and comments during the Question and Answer portion  of the Open House.  A summary of comments and questions from the open house, grouped by topic,  is included below.  In addition, where appropriate, a response and/or discussion of how the  comment is addressed in the EIS is also included.  Sunset Terrace/Renton Housing Authority (RHA) Redevelopment Plans  Question/Comment:  Meeting attendees asked what the plan is for Sunset Terrace/RHA  redevelopment.  In addition, they wanted to know if apartments, condominiums and commercial  space would be included in the redeveloped Sunset Terrace, whether stand‐alone commercial would  be part of the plans for a redeveloped Sunset Terrace and if there would be opportunities to buy  commercial space there.  Response:  Responses were provided at the meeting indicating that multiple options would be  reviewed in the EIS for redevelopment of the Sunset Terrace property.  The Sunset Terrace/RHA  redevelopment plan includes a vibrant, mixed‐income community (including low‐ and middle‐ incomes) on the existing Sunset Terrace site.  Redevelopment plans includes 1:1 replacement of all  family affordable housing units that exist within Sunset Terrace.  Some units would be replaced on  the Sunset Terrace site and some within the larger Sunset Area Planned Action Study Area.  Zoning  in the Sunset Terrace allows for ground floor retail with residential above.  This mixed‐use  development type is a component of the anticipated redevelopment studied in the EIS, but not  stand‐alone commercial.  RHA also plans development of other RHA‐owned properties within the  larger Sunset Planned Action Study Area.    New Commercial Development  Question/Comments:  Several questions or comments were received at the meeting relating the  commercial development anticipated under the alternatives reviewed in the EIS.  One commenter  described the relationship of higher density development within the study area encouraging new  retail development and reducing traffic impacts.  Meeting attendees asked about what types of  employment would be anticipated in the study area, and whether or not job estimates provided at  the meeting included construction jobs.  Response:  Answers were provided at the meeting stating that anticipated employment was based  on commercial uses allowed within the existing zoning, which include retail, commercial, small  offices, and non‐profits, among other uses allowed.  Big‐box retail is not allowed within existing  zoning.  The employment numbers studied in the EIS alternatives are area‐wide numbers, and do  not include temporary construction jobs. Temporary construction jobs would be in addition to the  jobs considered in the EIS.    Low Income Housing  Question/Comments:  Meeting participants were interested in knowing where existing low‐income  residents would move to, and whether there would be additional low‐income housing for those  interested in expanding Section 8 housing within the study area.  City of Renton  Sunset Area Community EIS    Summary of the Scoping Process 4 November 2010 ICF 00593.10   Response:  Answers provided at the meeting indicated that RHA will create a relocation plan for all  residents in which each resident is contacted.  RHA indicated that replacement housing will be as  good as or better than existing units. The 1:1 replacement of affordable housing units at Sunset  Terrace would include replacement of the existing affordable housing units within both the existing  Sunset Terrace Redevelopment Study Area and within the larger Sunset Area Planned Action Study  Area.  The EIS alternatives include market rate, affordable and public housing replacement units for  the redevelopment of Sunset Terrace.  The City’s existing zoning regulations includes incentives for  affordable housing.   Traffic Safety and Transportation Infrastructure Plans  Question/Comments:  Meeting participants expressed concerns about traffic safety in the Sunset  Area Planned Action study area.  They indicated that traffic has increased over the years and safety  has decreased.  Commenters indicated that they would like the Study Area to be safe for pedestrians,  calling out the corner of 12th Street and Harrington Avenue NE as particularly bad, with safety issues  exacerbated by large numbers of kids crossing the street at this location.  Others commented on cars  avoiding left turns because of traffic safety causing additional traffic issues.  Meeting participants  asked the City to comment on traffic safety and pedestrian improvements in the study area.  Response:  Responses provided at the meeting indicated that the EIS alternatives look at physical  improvements to transportation infrastructure in the study area.  Transportation infrastructure and  improvements, including both vehicular and pedestrian modes of transportation. In terms of  addressing left turns, Sunset Boulevard improvements included in the EIS alternatives will look at  access management options that address both local access as well as state highway design needs.  In  addition, the alternatives also address police and fire impacts.   Sunset Boulevard Improvements  Question/Comments:  Meeting participants provided comments on proposed Sunset Boulevard  improvements being considered in the EIS.  Interest was expressed in providing one or more  pedestrian bridges over Sunset Boulevard that would connect commercial areas and transit stops on  either side of the street.  In addition, residents complained that existing trees along Sunset  Boulevard were overgrown, break up the sidewalk and block stormwater catch‐basins.  Meeting  participants indicated that any new trees planted would need to be smaller tree species, and that a  commitment would be needed to maintain planted landscaping.  Meeting participants also indicated  an interest in providing easy pedestrian access between the Planned Action Study Area and Gene  Coulon Park located to the west along Lake Washington.  Response:  Within the Sunset Area Planned Action Study Area, pedestrian improvements are  planned along NE Sunset Boulevard as well as along other neighborhood roads.  Intersection  improvements are intended to respond to the need for better north‐south connections.  Sidewalk  and drainage improvements are also planned.  The City has plans for a pedestrian connection  between Renton Highlands Urban Center and the Downtown Urban Center North in the vicinity of  the Landing that is in proximity to Lake Washington and Gene Coulon Park.    Police Enforcement of Traffic on Sunset Boulevard  Question/Comment:  Meeting participants indicated an interest in seeing more police enforcement  of traffic on Sunset Boulevard.  City of Renton  Sunset Area Community EIS    Summary of the Scoping Process 5 November 2010 ICF 00593.10   Response:  A response provided at the meeting indicated that citizens can contact the Renton Police  Department directly to request targeted traffic enforcement for a specified location and time of day.    Funding Sources/Financial Analysis for Projects  Question/Comment:  A meeting participant asked if there is any analysis of funding sources such as  bonds, in the EIS.  Another meeting participant asked where the money would come from to  implement projects described in the EIS.  Response:  Responses were provided at the meeting indicated that projects included in the EIS are  designed to attract funding sources.  An analysis of funding sources is not part of the environmental  analysis process, though this type of analysis will occur separately in order to help achieve the City’s  vision for the study area.  King County Library Improvements  Question/Comment:  A meeting participant noted that Renton voters approved King County  Library annexation and the Highlands Branch of the public library will be rebuilt.  Response:  Alternatives studied in the EIS assume the Highlands Branch of the King County Library  System will be rebuilt and relocated, some in the neighborhood and some in the Potential Sunset  Terrace Redevelopment Subarea in particular.    Written Comments   In addition to comments received at the September 1, 2010 Open House, the City of Renton received  the following written comments during the August 13 to October 18, 2010 comment period:  King County Metro: Transit Service and Facilities  King County Metro staff commented via a September 30, 2010 email on transit service within the  study area:  The project area is served by Routes 240 and 909.  Route 909 serves two bus stops along  Harrington, and Route 240 operates along Sunset Blvd.  Route 240 provides frequent service  between Renton and Bellevue via the Renton Highlands, so, the redevelopment should be well  served by transit.  Other routes in the greater Renton Highlands area are the 105, 111 and 908.  The two bus stops on Harrington could use additional 10 ft. X 4 ft. ADA [Americans with  Disabilities Act] landing area at the back of the sidewalk.  Please contact LG Hahn, Transit  Planner, at 206‐684‐1725, lg.hahn@kingcounty.gov, to discuss.  The current Metro bus routes will be addressed in the EIS. The alternatives include transit and non‐ motorized improvements to NE Sunset Boulevard. Comments regarding bus stops on Harrington  Avenue NE will be considered.    United States Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA), Region 10  The US EPA provided a letter dated October 18, 2010 to the City, and these are summarized in  Table 1 together with responses.  A copy of the full letter is provided in Attachment C.  City of Renton  Sunset Area Community EIS    Summary of the Scoping Process 6 November 2010 ICF 00593.10   Table 1. USEPA Comments and Responses  Summary of Comment Response  The City’s website and particularly the scoping  document are particularly useful and exemplary of  an effective scoping approach.  The comment is noted.  Redevelopment of Sunset Terrace into a healthy,  livable, affordable, viable and green community  would be consistent with HUD‐DOT‐EPA  Interagency Partnership for Sustainable  Communities’ six livability principles:  z Provide more transportation choices;  z Promote equitable, affordable housing;  z Enhance economic competitiveness;  z Support existing communities;  z Coordinate and leverage federal policies  and investment; and,  z Value communities and neighborhoods.  The comment is noted.  The City and RHA intend to  apply for future federal funding to help revitalize  the Sunset Area Community.  Range of Alternatives: Environmental impacts  may be as much a function of planning concepts  (building height and massing, open space,  topography, connections/edges, circulation, land  use) as it is a function of the intensity and density  of redevelopment. Varying the location and type of  public investment as well as anticipating different  levels of private investment is a reasonable  approach for these complex issues.  The comment is noted.  The project description in  the EIS addresses the planning concepts and the  different levels of investment and private  redevelopment.  Phased Approach: Temporary impacts are  generally those occurring 5 years or less.   Consideration should be given to long‐term social,  economic, and environmental impacts including  mitigation.  In addition to reviewing the short‐term action of  the Sunset Terrace public housing community  redevelopment, a 20‐year look at redevelopment  in the neighborhood is also being considered in the  EIS.  Air Toxics: Discuss the cancer and non‐cancer  health effects associated with diesel exhaust  (mobile source air toxics or MSAT). Identify  sensitive receptors including parks, schools,  hospitals, day care centers, etc. Disclose locations  where emissions could increase near sensitive  receptors. Assess or account for (qualitative or  modeled depending on severity) factors that could  influence degree of adverse impacts to human  health. Hotspot analysis for receptor locations for  air toxics and particulate matter. Commit to air  quality construction mitigation measures.  The EIS will include an air quality analysis. Air  quality construction mitigation measures will be  addressed in the EIS.  The EIS will qualitatively describe the potential for  MSAT emissions and potential health effects.  The  study area is not near any major industrial  facilities that emit large amounts of toxic air  pollutants.   Existing traffic on N.E. Sunset  Boulevard includes only 2% heavy diesel vehicles,  which is typical of commercial arterials.    Indoor Air: Encourage Renton to integrate lessons  learned at High Point in Seattle regarding the  Breathe Easy Project.  The EIS will include an air quality analysis. The  City will explore measures to improve indoor air  quality.  Grant programs such as the Breath‐Easy  Homes program could provide funding to foster  construction methods that reduce dust, mold, and  air toxics concentrations in the homes.  City of Renton  Sunset Area Community EIS    Summary of the Scoping Process 7 November 2010 ICF 00593.10   Summary of Comment Response  Legacy Pollutants: Disclose the findings of any  relevant legacy pollutant studies; as appropriate,  conduct Phase I and Phase II environmental site  assessments.  The EIS will address environmental health based  on a records search for the Planned Action Study  Area.  In addition, a Phase I site assessment was  completed on one vacant property that is part of  the Potential Sunset Terrace Redevelopment  Subarea.   Based on criteria provided in the HUD Guidance,  and information collected to date, the Proposed  Sunset Terrace Redevelopment Area (i) is not  listed on an EPA Superfund National Priorities or  CERCLA List, or equivalent State list; (ii) is not  located within 3,000 feet of a toxic or solid waste  landfill site; (iii) does not have an underground  storage tank (which is not a residential fuel tank);  and (iv) is not known or suspected to be  contaminated by toxic chemicals or radioactive  materials.  Health Impact Assessment: Projects that have the  potential to substantially affect social, economic;  and/or environmental conditions within  communities may benefit from a Health Impact  Assessment (HIA), or, at least, elements of HIA.  The proposal includes elements intended to  improve the health of residents including  improved non‐motorized facilities, mixed use land  uses, open space, and other features. The EIS  addresses socioeconomics, transportation, and  public services. The City will consider whether  elements of a HIA, such as a policy level or  qualitative analysis would also be helpful to  decision‐makers and the public.  303(d) listed waters and total maximum daily  loads: Identify waterbodies likely to be impacted  by the project. If there are 303(d) listed water  bodies in the project area, the EIS must disclose  information regarding TMDL’s.  There should not  be degradation of where water quality standards  are being met.   The EIS will address water resources focusing on  downstream water bodies outside the study area,  as there are no water bodies inside the study area.   The status of water bodies in terms of 303(d)  listed waters and TMDL’s will be disclosed.  Predevelopment Hydrology: Designing for  predevelopment hydrology may be an effective  water quality management strategy for the project.  The EIS will address stormwater drainage. The  study area is highly developed and contains a  constructed drainage system. The EIS will address  alignment of future development with the City’s  stormwater code and the potential for green  infrastructure where feasible. It should be noted  that the City meets National Pollutant Discharge  Elimination System Phase II requirements.  Transportation: Integrating enhancements for  public transportation, bicycles and pedestrians as  well as capacity for vehicles is consistent with  quality urban design, increases clean and efficient  transportation options and promotes health living.   The City is interested in integrated and multi‐ modal strategies.  To assess/inform the  sustainability of transportation designs consider  performance metrics (e.g. CH2MHill’s Greenroads,  Multimodal transportation systems will be  addressed in the Transportation section of the EIS.   The City has adopted a complete streets ordinance,  and concepts will be addressed in the EIS.  City of Renton  Sunset Area Community EIS    Summary of the Scoping Process 8 November 2010 ICF 00593.10   Summary of Comment Response  and ICF’s “Scoring Smart Growth Streets Literature  Review – Findings” as well as others.)  Urban Forest Restoration: EIS should compare  how different redevelopment alternatives, design  guidelines, mitigation measures would impact  reaching goals for urban forest restoration.  Urban habitat conditions including tree canopy  will be addressed in the plants and animals section  of the EIS.  Threatened and Endangered Species: The EIS  should addressed endangered, threatened, and  candidate, plant and animal species under ESA  [Endangered Species Act].  If relevant, a biological  assessment and/or a description of the ESA Section  7 consultation with USFWS and NOAA fisheries  should be included.  The EIS will address plant and animal species  under ESA and under City critical area regulations.   As an urban area without presence of water  bodies, no effects within the study area are  anticipated. Analysis of receiving streams outside  the study area will be addressed in the EIS.  Invasive Species: Ground disturbing activities  create opportunity for establishment of non‐native  species. Encourage re‐vegetation with native  species.  There is no ruderal vegetation in the study area.  Nevertheless, discussion of invasive species will be  addressed.  Opportunities for native vegetation  such as on green street connections can be  addressed qualitatively.  Land Use/Urban Agriculture: Recommend that  the City consider urban agriculture and its  potential benefits in the EIS. Identify current and  future extent of urban agriculture, economic and  social contributions of urban agriculture, and an  urban agricultural plan.  The Sunset Terrace public housing development  creates opportunities for parks and open space  activities which may include community gardens.   The City will consider this activity in the  alternatives as appropriate.  The City Parks  Division is pursuing funding and researching  community garden sites for the neighborhood,  including in Sunset Terrace public housing  community.  Energy, Climate Change, and Greenhouse Gases:  Recommend that entities take voluntary action to  mitigate GHG emissions. Encourage efforts to  mitigate embodied, operational, and transportation  carbon impacts. In addition to use of the King  County GHG worksheet consider additional  guidance such as from the Council on  Environmental Quality’s October 6, 2010 guidance.  The EIS will address energy and greenhouse gas  emissions.   Environmental Justice: Actions should be taken to  conduct adequate public outreach and participation  to tribes, minority and low income populations.  Describe efforts taken to inform the community,  identify low income and minority communities,  disclose what was heard from the community  about the project during public participation  sessions, address whether impacts are likely to  occur and to whom, describe how public input is  incorporated into decisions about the project.  Propose mitigation measures.  The EIS will include a section on Environmental  Justice.  The City’s public participation plan and  City and RHA efforts, past and present, to inform  all members of the community will be described.   Mitigation measures to reduce impacts will be  described as appropriate.  Tribal Consultation: Government‐to‐government  consultation with federally recognized Indian tribal  governments is legally required. EPA recommends  that lead agencies consult with the potentially  Tribes were notified through the scoping notices  and also through the Section 106 consultation  process (e.g. letter regarding the area of potential  effect).  Tribes will be notified through the notice  City of Renton  Sunset Area Community EIS    Summary of the Scoping Process 9 November 2010 ICF 00593.10   Summary of Comment Response  affected tribes specific to their interests and  concerns.  of availability of the Draft EIS.  Cultural Resources: NEPA requires that effects on  cultural resources be considered in judging the  significance of environmental effects. Section 106  consultation is required prior to a FONSI or ROD.  The EIS will address cultural resources. Section  106 consultation is being conducted as part of the  environmental review process.      Summary of the Scoping Process  November 2010 ICF 00593.10   Attachment A  Scoping Notices and Scoping Document 57051 Federal Register /Vol. 75, No. 180/Friday, September 17, 2010/Notices DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY Federal Emergency Management Agency [Internal Agency Docket No. FEMA–1932– DR; Docket ID FEMA–2010–0002] Kansas; Amendment No. 2 to Notice of a Major Disaster Declaration AGENCY: Federal Emergency Management Agency, DHS. ACTION: Notice. SUMMARY: This notice amends the notice of a major disaster declaration for the State of Kansas (FEMA–1932–DR), dated August 10, 2010, and related determinations. DATES: Effective Date: September 7, 2010. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Peggy Miller, Office of Response and Recovery, Federal Emergency Management Agency, 500 C Street, SW., Washington, DC 20472, (202) 646–3886. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) hereby gives notice that pursuant to the authority vested in the Administrator, under Executive Order 12148, as amended, William J. Doran III, of FEMA is appointed to act as the Federal Coordinating Officer for this disaster. This action terminates the appointment of Michael R. Scott as Federal Coordinating Officer for this disaster. The following Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Numbers (CFDA) are to be used for reporting and drawing funds: 97.030, Community Disaster Loans; 97.031, Cora Brown Fund; 97.032, Crisis Counseling; 97.033, Disaster Legal Services; 97.034, Disaster Unemployment Assistance (DUA); 97.046, Fire Management Assistance Grant; 97.048, Disaster Housing Assistance to Individuals and Households in Presidentially Declared Disaster Areas; 97.049, Presidentially Declared Disaster Assistance— Disaster Housing Operations for Individuals and Households; 97.050, Presidentially Declared Disaster Assistance to Individuals and Households—Other Needs; 97.036, Disaster Grants—Public Assistance (Presidentially Declared Disasters); 97.039, Hazard Mitigation Grant. W. Craig Fugate, Administrator, Federal Emergency Management Agency. [FR Doc. 2010–23332 Filed 9–16–10; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 9111–23–P DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT [Docket No. FR–5443–N–01] Notice of Intent To Prepare a Draft Environmental Impact Statement for the Sunset Area Community, City of Renton, WA AGENCY: Office of the Assistant Secretary for Community Planning and Development, HUD. ACTION: Notice. SUMMARY: The Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) gives notice to the public, agencies, and Indian tribes that the City of Renton, WA, intends to prepare an Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) for the redevelopment of the Sunset Terrace public housing community and associated neighborhood revitalization. Pursuant to the authority granted by section 26 of the U.S. Housing Act of 1937 (42 U.S.C. 1437x) in connection with projects assisted under section 9 of that Act (42 U.S.C. 1437g), the City of Renton has assumed responsibility for compliance with the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) (42 U.S.C. 4321) in accordance with 24 CFR 58.1 and 58.4, and as the lead agency for compliance with the Washington State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA, RCW 43.21C), will perform the joint environmental review. This notice is in accordance with regulations of the Council on Environmental Quality at 40 CFR parts 1500–1508. All interested Federal, State, and local agencies, Indian tribes, groups, and the public are invited to comment on the scope of the EIS. If you are an agency with jurisdiction by law over natural or other public resources affected by the project, the City of Renton needs to know what environmental information germane to your statutory responsibilities should be included in the EIS. ADDRESSES: Comments relating to the scope of the EIS are requested and will be accepted by the contact person listed below until October 18, 2010. Any person or agency interested in receiving a notice and wishing to make comment on the Draft EIS should contact the persons listed below. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: The primary contact is Erika Conkling, AICP, Senior Planner, City of Renton Department of Community and Economic Development, 1055 S. Grady Way, Renton, WA 98057, 425–430–6578 (voice) 425–430–7300 (fax), or e-mail: econkling@rentonwa.gov. An alternative contact is Mark Santos-Johnson, Senior Economic Development Specialist, City of Renton Department of Community & Economic Development, 425–430–6584 (voice), msantosjohnson@rentonwa.gov, available at the same address and fax number listed above. Public Participation: The public will be invited to participate in the review of the Draft EIS. Release of the Draft EIS will be announced through public mailings as well as the local news media. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Project Name and Description The primary proposal is redevelopment of the Sunset Terrace public housing community, a Renton Housing Authority property of approximately 100 existing units in 50- year old, two story structures, located at the intersection of Sunset Boulevard and Harrington Avenue on approximately eight acres. The Renton Housing Authority also owns another approximately 3 acres of vacant land along Edmonds Avenue, NE., Glenwood Avenue, NE., and Sunset Lane, NE., and intends to purchase additional property adjacent to Sunset Terrace along Harrington Avenue NE. for housing and associated services. Sunset Terrace was developed in approximately 1960 though the rest of the neighborhood largely developed between the 1940s and 1970s. Conceptual plans propose redevelopment of Sunset Terrace and adjacent properties with mixed-income, mixed-use residential and commercial space and public amenities. It is expected that with the Sunset Terrace property and associated properties owned or purchased by Renton Housing Authority, that up to 200 additional new affordable housing units and potentially 300 new moderate income to market rate housing units could be created. There would be a 1-to-1 unit replacement for all 100 existing public housing units. Public amenities would be integrated with the residential development and may include the following: a community gathering space or ‘‘Third Place’’; a new recreation/ community center; a new library; a new park/open space; retail shopping and commercial space; and/or green infrastructure. As a result of the Sunset Terrace redevelopment, it is expected that private redevelopment in the neighborhood will be catalyzed. Supporting both Sunset Terrace and neighborhood redevelopment will be civic investments including: planned or anticipated upgrades to Sunset Boulevard (SR 900) and other local streets, stormwater drainage systems, parks and recreation facilities, VerDate Mar<15>2010 14:46 Sep 16, 2010 Jkt 220001 PO 00000 Frm 00073 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\17SEN1.SGM 17SEN1wwoods2 on DSK1DXX6B1PROD with NOTICES_PART 1 57052 Federal Register /Vol. 75, No. 180/Friday, September 17, 2010/Notices education facilities, and a new public library. The Sunset Area contains many public amenities and publicly-owned parcels creating significant opportunities for partnership and integration of civil infrastructure improvements. The City of Renton has already undertaken significant effort to prioritize strategies for public investment in the Sunset Area through the work of the recently approved Sunset Area Community Investment Strategy. Sunset Terrace’s redevelopment provides the opportunity to evaluate the neighborhood as a whole and determine what future land use redevelopment is possible and what public service and infrastructure improvements should be made in order to make this a more vibrant and attractive community for residents, businesses and property owners. The EIS will address the primary proposal of the Sunset Terrace area redevelopment as well as evaluate secondary proposals such as neighborhood redevelopment and supporting services and infrastructure improvements. The City of Renton is also proposing to adopt a Planned Action Ordinance pursuant to SEPA. A Planned Action Ordinance, if adopted, would not require future SEPA threshold determinations or EISs when future projects are consistent with EIS assumptions and mitigation measures. Alternatives to the Proposed Action: The alternatives to be considered by the lead agency will include the proposed action, a no action alternative, and a redevelopment alternative to the proposed action. The redevelopment alternative will be finalized after conclusion of the scoping comment period. It may address alternative land use mixes, infrastructure options, or other features. Probable Environmental Effects The lead agency has preliminarily identified the following areas for discussion in the EIS: aesthetics; air quality, including greenhouse gas emissions; earth; energy; environmental health; environmental justice; historic/ cultural resources; housing; land use; noise; parks and recreation; plants and animals; public services, including public education, safety, health, and social services; socioeconomics, including demographic, employment, and displacement; transportation; utilities, including wastewater, stormwater, water supply, telecommunication, natural gas, power, electrical; and water resources, including groundwater and surface water. Lead Agency This EIS will be a joint National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) and Washington State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA) document intended to satisfy requirements of federal and state environmental statutes. In accordance with specific statutory authority and HUD’s regulations at 24 CFR part 58, the City of Renton is authorized to assume responsibility for environmental review, decision-making, and action that would otherwise to apply HUD under NEPA, which includes NEPA lead agency responsibility. Questions may be directed to the individuals named in this notice under the heading ‘‘For Further Information Contact.’’ Dated: August 23, 2010. Mercedes Ma´rquez, Assistant Secretary for Community Planning and Development. [FR Doc. 2010–23181 Filed 9–16–10; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 4210–67–P DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT [Docket No. FR–5375–N–36] Federal Property Suitable as Facilities To Assist the Homeless AGENCY: Office of the Assistant Secretary for Community Planning and Development, HUD. ACTION: Notice. SUMMARY: This Notice identifies unutilized, underutilized, excess, and surplus Federal property reviewed by HUD for suitability for possible use to assist the homeless. DATES: Effective Date: September 17, 2010. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Kathy Ezzell, Department of Housing and Urban Development, 451 Seventh Street, SW., Room 7262, Washington, DC 20410; telephone (202) 708–1234; TTY number for the hearing- and speech-impaired (202) 708–2565, (these telephone numbers are not toll-free), or call the toll-free Title V information line at 800–927–7588. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: In accordance with the December 12, 1988 court order in National Coalition for the Homeless v. Veterans Administration, No. 88–2503–OG (D.D.C.), HUD publishes a Notice, on a weekly basis, identifying unutilized, underutilized, excess and surplus Federal buildings and real property that HUD has reviewed for suitability for use to assist the homeless. Today’s Notice is for the purpose of announcing that no additional properties have been determined suitable or unsuitable this week. Dated: September 9, 2010. Mark R. Johnston, Deputy Assistant Secretary for Special Needs. [FR Doc. 2010–22918 Filed 9–16–10; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 4210–67–P DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT [Docket No. FR–5442–N–01] Notice of Single Family Loan Sale (SFLS 2010) AGENCY: Office of the Assistant Secretary for Housing—Federal Housing Commissioner, HUD. ACTION: Notice of sale of mortgage loans. SUMMARY: This notice announces HUD’s intention to sell certain unsubsidized single family mortgage loans, without Federal Housing Administration (FHA) mortgage insurance, in a competitive, sealed bid sale (SFLS 2010). This notice also generally describes the bidding process for the sale and certain persons who are ineligible to bid. DATES: The Bidder’s Information Package (BIP) was made available to qualified bidders on August 31, 2010. Bids for the loans must be submitted on the bid date, which is currently scheduled for September 22, 2010. HUD anticipates that award(s) will be made on or about September 22, 2010 (Award Date). ADDRESSES: To become a qualified bidder and receive the BIP, prospective bidders must complete, execute, and submit a Confidentiality Agreement and a Qualification Statement acceptable to HUD. Both documents will be available on the HUD Web site at http:// www.hud.gov/offices/hsg/comp/asset/ sfam/sfls.cfm. Please mail and fax executed documents to HUD’s Asset Sales Office: Asset Sales Office, United States Department of Housing and Urban Development, 451 7th Street, SW., Room 3136, Washington, DC 20410, Attention: Single Family Sale Coordinator, Fax: 202–708–2771. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: John Lucey, Deputy Director, Asset Sales Office, Room 3136, Department of Housing and Urban Development, 451 Seventh Street, SW., Washington, DC 20410–8000; telephone 202–708–2625, extension 3927. Hearing- or speech- impaired individuals may call 202–708– 4594 (TTY). These are not toll-free numbers. VerDate Mar<15>2010 14:46 Sep 16, 2010 Jkt 220001 PO 00000 Frm 00074 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\17SEN1.SGM 17SEN1wwoods2 on DSK1DXX6B1PROD with NOTICES_PART 1   SUNSET PLANNED ACTION/ EIS   FILE NUMBER: LU10‐052          1  Sunset Area Community EIS Scoping Document  The City of Renton, in cooperation with the Renton Housing Authority, intends to issue an  Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) addressing future redevelopment of the Sunset Area Community.  This EIS will be a joint State Environmental Policy Act/ National Environmental Policy Act (SEPA/NEPA)  document, intended to satisfy requirements of state and federal environmental statutes.  Through  Federal legislative authorization, the City of Renton has assumed responsibility for compliance with  NEPA (40 CFR 1508.12) and the related Federal laws and authorities that would otherwise apply to the  US Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD).   Pursuant to SEPA, the City of Renton is the  lead agency for the redevelopment and infrastructure proposal detailed below.  The purpose of this document is to present background information and proposed environmental topics  to be included in the EIS under preparation for the Sunset Area Community.  This document presents  the proposal, a description of the EIS topics, and how the City intends to solicit comments.  A scoping  notice issued by the City of Renton on August 13, 2010 should be read in conjunction with this scoping  document.  Scoping Notices are available on the City of Renton website (www.rentonwa.gov) or by  contacting the Contact Person listed below.   Background  What is the Proposal?  The proposal is to redevelop the Sunset Terrace public housing community, encourage  neighborhood redevelopment, and implement public service and infrastructure improvements.  Proposed Sunset Terrace Redevelopment. The project  includes redevelopment of the Sunset  Terrace public housing community, a Renton Housing Authority property of approximately 100  existing units in 50‐year old, two story structures, located at the intersection of Sunset Boulevard  and Harrington Avenue NE on approximately eight acres.  The Renton Housing Authority also owns  another approximately three acres of vacant land along Edmonds Avenue NE, Glenwood Avenue NE,  and Sunset Lane NE and intends to purchase additional property adjacent to Sunset Terrace along  Harrington Avenue NE for housing and associated services. Conceptual plans propose  redevelopment of Sunset Terrace and adjacent properties with mixed‐income, mixed‐use residential  and commercial space and public amenities. It is expected that, with the Sunset Terrace property  and associated properties owned or purchased by Renton Housing Authority, up to 200 additional  new affordable housing units and potentially 300 new moderate income to market rate housing  units could be created. There would be a 1‐to‐1 unit replacement for all 100 existing public housing  units. Public amenities would be integrated with the residential development and may include the  following: a community gathering or “Third Place”; a new recreation/community center; a new  SUNSET PLANNED ACTION/ EIS   FILE NUMBER: LU10‐052          2    public library; a new park/open space; retail shopping and commercial space; and/or green  infrastructure.   Adjacent Area. As a result of the Sunset Terrace redevelopment, it is expected that private  redevelopment in the neighborhood will be catalyzed.  Supporting both Sunset Terrace and  neighborhood redevelopment will be civic investments including: planned or anticipated upgrades  to Sunset Boulevard (SR 900) and other local streets, stormwater drainage systems, parks and  recreation facilities, education facilities, and a new public library. Sunset Terrace’s redevelopment  provides the opportunity to evaluate the neighborhood as a whole and determine what future land  use redevelopment is possible and what public service and infrastructure improvements should be  made in order to make this a more vibrant and attractive community for residents, businesses and  property owners.  The EIS will address Sunset Terrace area redevelopment as well as neighborhood  redevelopment and supporting services and infrastructure improvements.  SEPA Planned Action. The City is also proposing to adopt a Planned Action Ordinance pursuant to  the State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA). A Planned Action Ordinance, if adopted, would not  require future SEPA threshold determinations or EISs when future projects are consistent with the  Sunset Area Community EIS assumptions and mitigation measures.    What is the study area?  Sunset Terrace is generally bounded by Sunset Lane NE and Glenwood Avenue NE on the north, NE  10th Street on the east, NE Sunset Boulevard on the south, and Edmonds Avenue NE on the west.  The proposed planned action neighborhood study area is generally bounded by NE 21st Street on the  north, Monroe Avenue NE on the east, NE 7th Street on the south, and Edmonds Avenue NE.   SUNSET PLANNED ACTION/ EIS   FILE NUMBER: LU10‐052          3      SUNSET PLANNED ACTION/ EIS   FILE NUMBER: LU10‐052          4    What is an Environmental Impact Statement (EIS)?  An EIS is an informational document intended to allow for citizen and agency comment and assist  agencies make informed choices about proposals.  An EIS contains descriptions and analysis of:  z The proposed action and alternative actions  z Existing conditions of the built and natural environment (i.e., the affected environment or  setting)  z Impacts to the built and natural environment that may occur if the proposed action or an  alternative action were implemented (direct, indirect, and cumulative)  z Mitigation measures to reduce or eliminate impacts of the proposed action, and  z Summaries of impacts found to be significant, unavoidable, and adverse (meaning residual  impacts of the proposed action despite mitigation measures).  What is a Planned Action?  The Planned Action designation by a jurisdiction reflects a decision that adequate environmental  review has been completed and further environmental review under SEPA, for each specific  development proposal or phase, will not be necessary if it is determined that each proposal or phase  is consistent with the development levels and mitigation measures specified in a Planned Action  Ordinance. Although future proposals that qualify as Planned Actions would not be subject to  additional SEPA review, they would be subject to application notification and permit process  requirements. Because a Planned Action is contemplated for the Sunset Area Community proposals,  public comment during the EIS process is encouraged.  What is scoping?  Scoping is a process intended to ensure that the EIS focuses on and addresses all relevant issues.  The City is required to notify agencies, tribes, and the public when an EIS is under preparation and to  solicit comments on the range of alternatives and impacts to be discussed in an EIS. Public comment  is being solicited in a scoping process through September 13, 2010.  See “How do I comment on the  EIS” below.  What will the EIS study?  Elements of the Environment to Be Addressed  The City of Renton has identified the following areas for discussion in the EIS: aesthetics; air quality,  including greenhouse gas emissions; earth; energy; environmental health; environmental justice;  historic/cultural resources; housing; land use; noise; parks and recreation; plants and animals; public  services, including public education, safety, health, and social services; socioeconomics, including  demographic, employment, and displacement; transportation; utilities, including wastewater,  stormwater, water supply, telecommunication, natural gas, power, electrical; and water resources,  including groundwater and surface water.  More information is described below under  “Environmental Topics.”  SUNSET PLANNED ACTION/ EIS   FILE NUMBER: LU10‐052          5    Conceptual Alternatives  The alternatives to be considered in the EIS will include the proposed action, a no action alternative,  and a redevelopment alternative to the proposed action.  The redevelopment alternative will be  finalized after the scoping meeting and conclusion of the comment period.  It may address  alternative land use mixes, infrastructure options, or other features.  How do I comment on the EIS?  Public comment is being solicited in a scoping process through September 13, 2010 including  written comments and a scoping meeting.   Send written comments to the contact person listed under “How can I get more information?”  A scoping meeting will be held on September 1, 2010 at 6:00 p.m. at the Highlands Neighborhood  Center, 800 Edmonds Ave NE, Renton, WA  98056.  Written and oral comments will be taken at this  meeting.    The public will also be invited to comment during the comment period on the Draft EIS after it is  published, and during a public hearing regarding the Planned Action.  Notifications about the Draft  EIS publication and public meetings and hearings will be made in accordance with adopted City  procedures. Interested parties who sign up on mailing lists or contact the City with a request to  receive notices will also receive notices. See “How can I get more information” below.  How can I get more information?  The City’s web site will have updated information on documents and public meetings – go to  Renton’s website at: sunsetarea.rentonwa.gov.  Check it often so you’ll know what’s happening. Or  email or call our contact person.  Contact Person  Erika Conkling, AICP  Senior Planner  City of Renton Department of Community and Economic Development  1055 S. Grady Way  Renton, WA 98057  (425)430‐6578 voice (425)430‐7300 fax  econkling@rentonwa.gov  Environmental Topics  Potential Environmentally Significant Issues  The following is a summary of the elements of the environment that have been identified as being  potentially impacted by the proposal, and therefore, will be addressed in the EIS.  Impacts, mitigation  measures, and impacts that cannot be mitigated will be identified in the EIS.    SUNSET PLANNED ACTION/ EIS   FILE NUMBER: LU10‐052          6    Topic Proposed Environmental Analysis Approach  Earth Describe the geologic setting and simplified geologic  character of the study area. Rely primarily on narrative  description using soils reports from recent constructed  projects – public and private.  Conduct a limited field  surface assessment of the Sunset Terrace site. Discuss the  degree and nature of potential soil/geotechnical impacts  encouraged by the proposal and alternatives.    Air   Prepare an analysis of air quality and greenhouse gas  emissions. Determine if the proposal and alternatives  would result in additional air pollutant emissions.  Summarize existing air quality conditions and compare  growth levels and potential Vehicle Miles Traveled (VMT)  based on the transportation model.   Prepare a focused review of greenhouse gas emissions  using the King County greenhouse gas emissions worksheet  to determine the potential for alternatives to reduce  greenhouse gas emissions compared with dispersed  development patterns.   Water   Assess current conditions and potential impacts regarding  groundwater and surface water. Describe change in  impervious surfaces and water quantity and quality taking  into account current surface water, drainage, and soils  conditions, proposed drainage master plan, and low impact  development techniques.  Plants and Animals Since the study area is largely developed the primary topics  to be addressed are water quality and runoff effects on  adjacent natural systems outside of the study area. Review  available information and conduct limited site  reconnaissance visits of the Sunset Terrace sites.  (No  habitat or wetland surveys or assessments will be  conducted.) Prepare a technical report that: describes the  existing conditions for wildlife habitat, habitat features,  and potential use by Federal or State listed threatened,  endangered, candidate, or priority species. Summarize  existing City and state inventories and contacts with  representatives from other agencies that may have wildlife  information relative to the study area. Describe application  of federal state, and local regulations that apply. Assess the  potential for proposed low impact development standards,  regional drainage systems, and other features to minimize  impacts. Document findings.  It is anticipated that the  conclusion for NEPA purposes will be a letter of no effect  regarding federal listed species.  SUNSET PLANNED ACTION/ EIS   FILE NUMBER: LU10‐052          7    Topic Proposed Environmental Analysis Approach  Energy and natural resources  Describe energy sources and consumption, changes in  demand for energy as a result of the proposal and  alternatives, and mitigation measures to reduce demand  such as energy code requirements, proximity to transit  services, etc.  Estimate Sunset Terrace site‐wide energy  usage by direct space heating, electricity usage, and vehicle  usage. Use the Energy Star Target Finder model to forecast  baseline energy usage, natural gas consumption, electricity  usage according to geographic area and facility type.   Calculate vehicle‐related energy consumption by  considering project‐specific VMT forecasts, which are  based on the facility’s mixed‐use land use goals. For a  neighborhood level analysis, use the King County GHG  spreadsheet to estimate energy usage and supplement it  with estimates of vehicle‐related fuel consumption.  Evaluate potential energy reductions achievable by using  more stringent energy codes and by adopting LEED energy‐ conservation design goals.  Environmental health hazards Assess potential soils contamination in the study area  based on contamination and cleanup data as available from  the City, state and other readily available sources. Based on  available information concerning historic land uses in the  study area, identify the risk of potential contamination in  the study area. Describe federal and state laws and specific  mitigating measures to address potential contamination if  found.    Environmental justice Describe the potential of the proposal and alternatives to  have a disproportionately high and adverse human health  or environmental effects on minority and low‐income  populations and provide appropriate mitigation.  Noise   Describe the overall noise character of the study area  based on existing uses, and for Sunset Terrace based on  noise monitoring. Conduct 48‐hour mid‐week noise  monitoring at one monitoring location (Sunset Terrace).  As  part of the noise monitoring conduct site visits to the  Sunset Terrace site to identify site‐specific noise sources  such major roads, commercial facilities, and airports  (addressing facilities within 15 miles).  Review the FAA Part 150 Noise Compatibility Study for  Renton Airport to evaluate how existing and future airport  noise levels will affect the Sunset Terrace and the planned  action area.   Determine future noise levels based on U.S. Department of  HUD Noise Assessment Guidelines and use of the traffic  SUNSET PLANNED ACTION/ EIS   FILE NUMBER: LU10‐052          8    Topic Proposed Environmental Analysis Approach  model volumes and other noise programs.   Describe existing ambient noise levels and potential  increases in noise levels due to increases in traffic. Describe  mitigation measures such as the energy code and other  noise abatement practices.  Land use Assess land use compatibility including the proposed  amount, types, scale and pattern of uses in comparison  with the existing land use pattern and adjacent  development.  Analyze conformance with applicable federal, state,  county, and local plans and regulations, such as the Renton  Comprehensive Plans and Zoning/Development  regulations.  Housing   Calculate the number of housing units that would be  provided and those potentially eliminated, with estimates  of housing type (attached, detached, etc.) and affordability  (extremely low, very low, low income, etc.). Describe plans  for replacement of current housing and relocation of the  occupants including whether replacement facilities or  housing units are available within the community or in  nearby neighborhoods and effect of the relocation of  families on these neighborhoods  Aesthetics and Light and glare   Use existing photos, maps, aerials, and text to describe the  overall aesthetic character of the study area.  Describe site  and neighborhood character in terms of visual quality and  coherence, character and design of existing buildings, and  building height, bulk and scale. Using conceptual plans  developed for the Sunset Terrace and other example  developments indicative of zoning allowances, describe the  degree and nature of changes due to the proposal and  alternatives and potential effects on surrounding visual  character, height and bulk, and shade/shadow.    Recreation   Address amount and type of designated and informal parks  and recreational program opportunities in the vicinity,  operators, and baseline of existing facility capacity and  programs. Describe proximity of parks and recreation  facilities to current and future residents. Determine who  currently uses the facilities (youth, adults, seniors) and who  may use the facilities in the future as a result of the  proposal.  Describe the demand for parks and recreation  services, types of facilities/amenities that may be needed.  Develop mitigation including opportunities to add parks  and recreation facilities, or to address inter‐agency  SUNSET PLANNED ACTION/ EIS   FILE NUMBER: LU10‐052          9    Topic Proposed Environmental Analysis Approach  agreements to optimize available facilities.   Historic and cultural preservation   Historic Resources: Conduct a literature search for the  study area and vicinity to identify the presence of any  known historic resources. Notify the Washington  Department of Archaeology and Historic Preservation  (DAHP) and affected tribes by letter about the project and  the pending cultural resources investigation, as necessary,  and invite them to participate and contribute information  to the project. Conduct a reconnaissance‐level historic  resources survey of built environment resources 45 years  of age or older on Sunset Terrace (approximately 31  buildings) and along SR 900 (one parcel deep,  approximately 18 buildings).  Inspect the integrity of these  resources to evaluate their potential eligibility for listing in  the National Register of Historic Places. Collect information  about their architectural character and physical integrity of  each resource, including photographs, and prepare a  Washington Historic Property Inventory form for each  resource surveyed.   Archaeological Resources: Conduct a literature search and  coordinate with agencies as described for historic  resources. Conduct an archaeological survey limited to  Sunset Terrace and SR 900 to identify previously recorded  and/or unrecorded archaeological resources where  ground‐disturbing activities are expected to take place.  Inspect the ground surface at Sunset Terrace to find  exposed ground surface, any exposed cultural materials,  and areas that have high probability for having buried  deposits that could contain cultural materials. In areas  where project‐related ground‐disturbance is expected,  excavate shovel test pits to reveal the nature of the  subsurface deposits and whether or not buried cultural  materials are present. If required, selected probes will be  made along SR 900 in readily accessible landscaped areas  to confirm the area’s disturbance and likely lack of  resources. All probes will be backfilled upon completion.  Any newly identified archaeological sites will be mapped,  photographed, and recorded on Washington State  Archeological Inventory forms.   Socioeconomics Address demographic character changes, present and  future employment and income patterns, and potential  displacement and relocation associated with the proposal  and alternatives.  Transportation   Perform traffic analysis to determine roadway design  SUNSET PLANNED ACTION/ EIS   FILE NUMBER: LU10‐052          10    Topic Proposed Environmental Analysis Approach  parameters and potential traffic related environmental  impacts. Prepare an operational analysis, and an  assessment of safety, transit, non‐motorized modes.    Public services   Address the following services:  z Public Safety (police, fire, and emergency medical  services)  z Educational Facilities (K‐12 schools, early childhood  education)  z Health Care (e.g. regular and emergency dental and  medical care)  z Social Services (e.g. family counseling centers, day care  centers; services for senior citizens and the  handicapped; nutrition centers, meals on wheels;  income maintenance and man power programs, etc.).  Prepare a demand analysis based on population, housing,  and employment estimates and service providers’ adopted  levels of service.  Utilities   Describe current conditions and potential need for  improved facilities as a result of growth and  redevelopment for the following services, wastewater,  stormwater, water supply, telecommunication, natural gas,  power, and electrical.    Inapplicable Environmental Topics  The following topics referenced on NEPA or SEPA checklists or guidance documents are considered  inapplicable to the Sunset Area Community:  z Agricultural Lands.  The study area is highly urbanized and is not used for agricultural purposes.  z Flooding.  The study area does not appear to contain any streams, and flood hazards have not  been mapped by the Federal Emergency Management Agency.  z Coastal and shoreline issues. The study area is not located along shorelines.  z Airport Runway Clear Zone or Clear Zone Disclosure.  The study area is not adjacent to the  Renton Airport.  z Exposure to hazards from stationary aboveground storage tanks that contain materials of an  explosive or flammable nature.  At this time, above ground storage tanks are not located in the  study area due to its residential and retail character.      Summary of the Scoping Process  November 2010 ICF 00593.10     Attachment B  Scoping Meeting Materials   Renton Sunset Area Community NEPA/SEPA  Environmental Impact Statement (EIS)  Scoping Meeting Comment Sheet  You are invited to comment on the scope of the EIS. You may comment on alternatives, mitigation  measures, probable significant adverse impacts, and licenses or other approvals that may be required.                                                You may turn comments in at the scoping meeting tonight, September 1, 2010.  Or you may submit  written comments on or before 5 p.m. September 13, 2010.  Send comments to:  Erika Conkling, AICP  Senior Planner  City of Renton Department of Community and Economic Development  1055 S. Grady Way  Renton, WA 98057  (425)430‐6578 voice (425)430‐7300 fax  econkling@rentonwa.gov  Welcome & AgendaƒWelcome and introductionsEIS t t d b k dƒEIS contents and backgroundƒProposals and alternativesƒHow to provide comments What is an EIS?ƒAn environmental impact statement (EIS) is:An informational document–An informational document – Allows residents, businesses, and other government agencies to comment ongovernment agencies to comment on proposals and alternativesƒThe Sunset Area Community PlannedThe Sunset Area Community Planned Action EIS is being prepared according to:–the National Environmental Policy Actthe National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA), and–the State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA)y( ) What does an EIS contain?ƒAn EIS contains descriptions and analysis of:The proposal and alternatives–The proposal and alternatives,– Existing conditions of the study area’s environment,environment,– Environmental impacts that may occur if the proposal or alternatives were implemented,– Mitigation measures to reduce or eliminate impacts, –Impacts found to be significant, unavoidable, and adverse despite mitigation. What is scoping?ƒA process intended to ensure that the EIS addresses all relevant issues– Occurs at the beginning of the EIS process to collect feedback on the proposed “scope” of the proposal/project–The City notifies agencies, tribes, and the public when an EIS is under preparation –City asks for comments on the range of ygalternatives and impacts to be discussed in an EIS – The Renton Sunset Area Community EIS iidllf tthhscoping period allows for comments through September 13, 2010 What is a planned action? ƒA planned action EIS:Is allowed by the State Environmental–Is allowed by the State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA)–Studies proposals in advancepp– Means future proposals would not need additional SEPA review when consistent ith th Pl d A ti EIS tiwith the Planned Action EIS assumptions and mitigation measuresCan help facilitate private and public–Can help facilitate private and public investment in the study area What are the proposals? ƒProposals are based on the Community Investment Strategy approved by the City in N b 2009November 2009ƒAddress high priority public investments–Potential Sunset Terrace Redevelopmentp– Sunset Boulevard Improvements– Drainage Master Plan–Additional recreational and educational–Additional recreational and educational investments – e.g. library, community services, parks and recreationƒWith investments additional private investmentƒWith investments, additional private investment and development is expected CIS Proposals Study Area What will the EIS study? Natural Environment Built EnvironmentAir Quality & Greenhouse Gas Emissions AestheticsEarthEnergyEarthEnergyPlants and AnimalsEnvironmental HealthWater Resources, groundwater & surface waterEnvironmental JusticeHi t i /C lt l RHistoric/Cultural ResourcesHousingLand UseNNoiseParks and RecreationPublic ServicesSocioeconomicsTransportationUtilities What are the potential alternatives?ƒThree conceptual alternatives– Alternative1: No ActionAlternative 2–Alternative 2– Alternative 3ƒVary location and type of public investment–Sunset Terrace Redevelopment–Sunset Terrace Redevelopment– Sunset Boulevard Transformation– Drainage Master Plan–Location of Libraryocat o o b a y– Additional parks and recreation opportunitiesƒAnticipate different levels of private investment–Low– Moderate–HighƒAlternatives 2 and 3 include approval of Planned Action OdiOrdinance Alternative Growth ComparisonNew Dwellings New Jobs Alternative 1: No ActionƒRequired to be studiedƒLimited public investment –leads to less pprivate investment– Sunset Terrace does not redevelop; only adjacent vacant parcels changeadjacent vacant parcels change– Sunset Boulevard not improved– Drainage Plan not implemented–Library moves to a new single-purpose site– No change to parks and recreationIncremental private development–Incremental private development• More single purpose uses and less mixed usesƒNo Planned Action Ordinance Alternative 2ƒModerate level of public investment – moderate private investment and growth per adopted zoningSunset Terrace: New mixed income housing mixed–Sunset Terrace: New mixed income housing, mixed uses, amenities • 250-350 new dwellings• 1:1 replacement for existing dwellings on site or in pggneighborhood– Sunset Boulevard: Improved largely in current ROW with attention to multiple modes and pedestriansDi Mt Pl N t di–Drainage Master Plan: New green storm drainage infrastructure where possible– Library included in Sunset Terrace Redevelopment Area but on single use sitebut on single use site– Additional active and passive recreation, coordination with School DistrictƒAssumes adoption of a Planned Action OrdinanceAssumes adoption of a Planned Action Ordinance Alternative 3ƒMost public investment – greater level of private investment and growth per adopted zoning–Sunset Terrace: New mixed income housing mixed uses–Sunset Terrace: New mixed income housing, mixed uses, amenities• Up to 500 new dwellings• 1:1 replacement for existing dwellings on site or in ihb h dneighborhood– Sunset Boulevard: Improve all forms of transportation; add design amenities; wider ROW allows for improvements at intersections, roundabouts, bike lanes and sidewalksintersections, roundabouts, bike lanes and sidewalks – Drainage Plan: More regional detention and green streets and other green infrastructure– Library: mixed use building in Sunset Terrace Rd lRedevelopment– Additional active and passive recreation, coordination with School DistrictƒAssumes adoption of a Planned Action OrdinanceƒAssumes adoption of a Planned Action Ordinance Preliminary Project Schedule How can the public provide comment?ƒScoping Period–Tonight–provide written or verbal commentsTonight provide written or verbal comments– Written comment period ends 9/13ƒDraft EIS– Anticipated December 2010– 45-day comment period– Public hearing anticipatedƒFinal EISA i i d M h 2011–Anticipated March 2011– Responses to public comments Questions & AnswersƒQuestions from Audience Bienvenida Y Orden del DíaƒBienvenida Y Presentaciones ƒContenido y ContextoƒPropuestas y AlternativasƒIndicaciones para ingresar sugerencias y comentarios Qué es la Declaracion de Impacto Ambiental?ƒLa declaración de Impacto Ambiental es: •Es undocumento informativo•Es un documento informativo• Que permite a los residentes, comerciantes y agencias gubernamentales a emitir comentarios sobre propuestas y alternativasƒLa Declaración de Impacto Ambiental y Plan dD lldlC idddS tde Desarrollo de la Comunidad de Sunset han sido preparadas de acuerdo a: •Reglamentación Nacional del Medio Ambiente•Reglamentación Nacional del Medio Ambiente (NEPA),y•Reglamentación Estatal del Medio Ambienteg(SEPA) Cuál es el contenido de la Declaración de Impacto Ambiental?ƒLa Declaración de Impacto Ambiental describe y analiza:describe y analiza: ƒPropuestas y AlternativasƒCondiciones existentes del Medio Ambiente del Área de EstudioƒImpacto al Medio Ambiente de propuestas alternativas en caso de que se lleven a caboalternativas en caso de que se lleven a cabo ,ƒMedidas para mitigar y reducir el Impacto Ambiental ƒListado de impacto de orden significativo, inevitable o que no se podrán mitigar Objetivos de la reunión de scopingƒUn proceso que intenta asegurar que todos los temas relevantes se hayan tenido en cuenta• Ocurre al principio de la Declaración de Impacto Ambiental y se encarga de recolectar comentarios sobre la propuesta/proyecto• La Ciudad notifica de la Declaración de Impacto Ambiental a las agencias gubernamentales, tribus, y el público en general pg• La Ciudad solicita comentarios sobre las alternativas que deben tenerse en consideración y deben ser discutidas en la Declaración del Impactodeben ser discutidas en la Declaración del Impacto Ambiental• Los comentarios sobre Renton Sunset Área acerca dlD l i dI tAbi tl ibiáde la Declaracion de Impacto Ambiental se recibirán hasta el 13 de Septiembre, 2010 Qué se entiende por Plan de Acción de la Declaración de Impacto Ambiental? ƒSe entiende por Plan de Acción en el ámbito de lD l iódI tAbi tlla Declaración de Impacto Ambiental:ƒEstán previstas en Reglamentación Estatal del Medio Ambiente(SEPA)Ambiente(SEPA) ƒEstudia las Propuestas para el Área con antelación ƒEsto significa que no se requerirán futuros estudios gq qSEPA si las acciones se enmarcan dentro de lo establecido previamente en la Planificación de Acciones de la Declaración de Impacto AmbientalAcciones de la Declaración de Impacto AmbientalƒFacilitaran y Agilizaran las inversiones privadas y públicas en el área de Sunset Cuáles son las propuestas? ƒLas propuestas están basadas en la Estrategia de Inversión aprobada por la Ciudad en N i b d 2009Noviembre de 2009ƒEstablece alta prioridad a las inversiones de carácter publico:carácter publico: 9Re-edificación potencial de Sunset Terrace 9Mejoras en la zona del Sunset Boulevard9PlGldDj9PlanGeneral de Drenaje9Inversiones adicionales en las aéreas de recreación y educación, por ejemplo: biblioteca, servicios a la id dtcomunidad, parques, etc. ƒDe llevarse a cabo estas inversiones, se prevé inversiones adicionales por parte del ámbito ppprivado Propuestas CIS Area de Estudio Qué se estudiara a través de la Declaracion de Impacto Ambiental?Impacto Ambiental? Natural Environment Built EnvironmentAir Quality & Greenhouse Gas Emissions AestheticsEarthEnergyEarthEnergyPlants and AnimalsEnvironmental HealthWater Resources, groundwater & surface waterEnvironmental JusticeHi t i /C lt l RHistoric/Cultural ResourcesHousingLand UseNNoiseParks and RecreationPublic ServicesSocioeconomicsTransportationUtilities Cuáles son las propuestas alternativas? ƒ3 Conceptos – 3 Alternativas9Alternative1: No Action9Alternative 29Alternative 3ƒTipo de Inversiones Públicas y Variedad de Emplazamientop9Re-edificación de Sunset Terrace 9Mejoras y Transformación en Sunset Boulevard9Plan General de Drenaje9Ubicación de la Biblioteca9Parques Adicionales y Oportunidades de Recreación ƒSe anticipa diferentes niveles de Inversión Privada9Baja9Media/Moderada9AltaAlt ti 2 d 3élili dƒAlternatives 2 and 3 prevéla inclusion de nuevalegislación y Plan de Acción Alternativas y Crecimiento ComparadoNew Dwellings New Jobs Alternative 1: No ActionƒEsta propuestas necesita ser previamente estudiada ƒInversión publica limitada –establece un mínimo de inversión privadaƒEl Área de Sunset Terrace no se renueva, solo los lotes d t d d ib difi ióadyacentes o desocupados reciben nueva edificación. ƒEl área de Sunset Boulevard no recibe mejorasƒEl Plan de Drenaje no se implementaƒLa Biblioteca se traslada a un lote de uso exclusivoƒLa Biblioteca se traslada a un lote de uso exclusivoƒNo se producen cambios en parques y otras áreas de recreaciónƒDesarrollo Privado Limitado9Mayor cantidad de lotes de uso exclusivo en lugar de lotes con múltiples usos o usos combinados (comercial y residencia)ƒNo se prevé nueva Legislación y Plan deNo se prevé nueva Legislación y Plan de Acción Alternative 2ƒInversión Publica de carácter medio dirigida a una inversión publica moderada y crecimiento de acuerdo a la zonificación vigenteƒSunset Terrace: Residencias de ingreso combinado de uso residencialƒSunset Terrace: Residencias de ingreso combinado, de uso residencial combinado y mixto, mixto vecinal/mixto urbano y servicios. 9Entre 250 y 350 viviendas nuevas9Proporción 1:1 reemplazo de viviendas existentes por lote o en el vecindario pppƒSunset Boulevard: el mejoramiento ocurriría mayormente en áreas donde existe derecho de paso/servidumbre, especialmente dedicado al uso múltiple y peatones ƒEl Plan de Drenaje: donde sea posible, se transformaría en un sistema de infraestructura y drenado “verde” ƒLa Biblioteca se incluiría en el Plan de Re-edificación de Sunset Terrace, ,en un lote de uso exclusivoƒActividades de Recreación pasiva y activa, se desarrollaría en conjunto con el Distrito EducativoƒSe prevé la adopción de nueva legislación y Plan de Acción Alternative 3ƒInversión Pública Alta dirigida a crear un nivel mayor de inversión y crecimiento Privado de acuerdo a zonificación adoptada en el Plan.zonificación adoptada en el Plan. ƒSunset Terrace: Nuevas unidades de viviendas, Residencias de uso mixto o combinado, mixto vecinal y mixto urbano y servicios.9Arriba de 500unidadesdeviviendas9Arriba de 500 unidadesde viviendas9Proporcion1:1 reemplazo de viviendas existentes por lote o en el vecindario ƒSunset Boulevard: Mejoramiento completoƒEl Plan de Drenaje: de carácter regional, calles e infraestructura “verde” ƒBiblioteca: Edificio de uso mixto como parte de la Re-edificación de Sunset Terraceedificación de Sunset TerraceƒActividades de Recreación pasiva y activa, se desarrollaría en conjunto con el Distrito EducativoƒSe prevé la adopción de nueva legislación y Plan de Acción Esquema y Calendario Preliminar del Proyecto11 Ud. puede ingresar sus comentariosƒUd. puede enviar sus comentarios del siguiente modoƒPeriodo de Comentarios: 9Esta noche: Aceptamos comentarios por escrito u orales9El periodo para comentarios escritos concluye el día 13 dSti bde SetiembreƒDocumento Borrador de la Declaración de Impacto Ambiental (EIS)9Anticipada para el mes de Diciembre de 20109Anticipada para el mes de Diciembre de 20109Con 45 días para recibir comentarios9Se prevé una Reunión PublicaƒDocumento Final de la Declaración de ImpactoƒDocumento Final de la Declaración de Impacto Ambiental (EIS)9Anticipado para el mes de Marzo de 20119Respuestas a los comentarios del publico9Respuestas a los comentarios del publico Espacio para Preguntas y RespuestasƒPreguntas? Scoping Meeting Sunset Area Planned Action EIS September 1, 2010 Alternative Development Matrix ALTERNATIVE 1:  No Action Land Use Form and Location Housing Employment Public Facilities, Services &  Infrastructure Development Pattern Supports  Interconnection/ Walkability Stand‐alone commercial: clustered  complexes Single Family Redevelopment Small Retail Redevelopment Library ‐ single purpose site No improvement Primarily residential: urban scale, stacked  flat and/or townhouses with structured  parking. Multiplex Redevelopment Retail Lot Consolidation Library ‐ integrated into mixed use  development Pedestrian‐oriented development: minimize  setbacks, promote public realm, structured  parking Horizontal Mixed use Vacant Infill Development Shopping Center Redevelopment New Centers: Community Center, Senior  Center Transit‐oriented development: density  supports, transit integrated Vertical Mixed Use Homeownership Opportunities Local serving retail & services New parkland to support increased  residential capacity. Urban Intensity Focused  Around Key  Nodes, e.g. Sunset Terrace, Institutions Rental Opportunities Regional serving retail & services Parks & Recreation: Integrated with Master  Planned Development Urban Intensity Focused Along Corridor:  Sunset Boulevard Market Rate Parks & Recreation: Optimize City/School  Facilities Affordable Parks & Recreation: Integration with  Regional Drainage Facilities Mixed Income Land Use Pattern Supports Low Impact  Development, Green Streets Sunset Terrace Redevelopment Education ‐ Spectrum of Ages Family Village Redevelopment Integrated Social Services ALTERNATIVE 2:  Mid‐Range Intensity Improvements Land Use Form and Location Housing Employment Public Facilities, Services &  Infrastructure Development Pattern Supports  Interconnection/ Walkability Stand‐alone commercial: clustered  complexes Single Family Redevelopment Small Retail Redevelopment Library ‐ single purpose site No improvement Primarily residential: urban scale, stacked  flat and/or townhouses with structured  parking. Multiplex Redevelopment Retail Lot Consolidation Library ‐ integrated into mixed use  development Pedestrian‐oriented development: minimize  setbacks, promote public realm, structured  parking Horizontal Mixed use Vacant Infill Development Shopping Center Redevelopment New Centers: Community Center, Senior  Center Transit‐oriented development: density  supports, transit integrated Vertical Mixed Use Homeownership Opportunities Local serving retail & services New parkland to support increased  residential capacity. Urban Intensity Focused  Around Key  Nodes, e.g. Sunset Terrace, Institutions Rental Opportunities Regional serving retail & services Parks & Recreation: Integrated with Master  Planned Development Urban Intensity Focused Along Corridor:  Sunset Boulevard Market Rate Parks & Recreation: Optimize City/School  Facilities Affordable Parks & Recreation: Integration with  Regional Drainage Facilities Mixed Income Land Use Pattern Supports Low Impact  Development, Green Streets Sunset Terrace Redevelopment Education ‐ Spectrum of Ages Family Village Redevelopment Integrated Social Services ALTERNATIVE 3:  High Intensity Improvements Land Use Form and Location Housing Employment Public Facilities, Services &  Infrastructure Development Pattern Supports  Interconnection/ Walkability Stand‐alone commercial: clustered  complexes Single Family Redevelopment Small Retail Redevelopment Library ‐ single purpose site No improvement Primarily residential: urban scale, stacked  flat and/or townhouses with structured  parking. Multiplex Redevelopment Retail Lot Consolidation Library ‐ integrated into mixed use  development Pedestrian‐oriented development: minimize  setbacks, promote public realm, structured  parking Horizontal Mixed use Vacant Infill Development Shopping Center Redevelopment New Centers: Community Center, Senior  Center Transit‐oriented development: density  supports, transit integrated Vertical Mixed Use Homeownership Opportunities Local serving retail & services New parkland to support increased  residential capacity. Urban Intensity Focused  Around Key  Nodes, e.g. Sunset Terrace, Institutions Rental Opportunities Regional serving retail & services Parks & Recreation: Integrated with Master  Planned Development Urban Intensity Focused Along Corridor:  Sunset Boulevard Market Rate Parks & Recreation: Optimize City/School  Facilities Affordable Parks & Recreation: Integration with  Regional Drainage Facilities Mixed Income Land Use Pattern Supports Low Impact  Development, Green Streets Sunset Terrace Redevelopment Education ‐ Spectrum of Ages Family Village Redevelopment Integrated Social Services Neighborhood Land Use Scoping Meeting Sunset Area Planned Action EIS September 1, 2010 Sunset Terrace Alternative Development Matrix ALTERNATIVE 1:  No Action Housing Development Urban Form Sunset Terrace Amenities Street Network,  Pedestrian Realm Non‐Residential Development Infill on vacant RHA properties No improvement No improvement No improvement None 1:1 Public Housing replacement (100 units) Focus density along Sunset Blvd New open space, e.g. active, garden, other Improved intersection and crossing at Sunset  Blvd and Harrington Neighborhood Retail New affordable and market rate units (250‐ 350) Focus density at Sunset Blvd/ Harrington  intersection and north on Harrington New rainwater park Green connection/ bioswale along Harrington New stand alone Highlands Library at Sunset  Terrace New affordable and market rate units (450‐ 550) Use townhomes to transition to residential  neighborhood Third Place Plaza with civic or community  building New hillside path on Sunset Blvd east of  Harrington New Mixed‐Use Highlands Library at Sunset  Terrace Neighborhood residential infill Disperse townhomes and apartments Third Place incorporated into new retail Close portion of Harrington as green  street/open space Office Build Sunset Terrace site to zoning capacity Flexible Community Services Center Transpo Hub: improved bus stops, carsharing,  and bike storage Community Center ALTERNATIVE 2:  Mid‐Range Intensity Improvements Housing Development Urban Form Sunset Terrace Amenities Street Network,  Pedestrian Realm Non‐Residential Development Infill on vacant RHA properties No improvement No improvement No improvement None 1:1 Public Housing replacement (100 units) Focus density along Sunset Blvd New open space, e.g. active, garden, other Improved intersection and crossing at Sunset  Blvd and Harrington Neighborhood Retail New affordable and market rate units (250‐ 350) Focus density at Sunset Blvd/ Harrington  intersection and north on Harrington New rainwater park Green connection/ bioswale along Harrington New stand alone Highlands Library at Sunset  Terrace New affordable and market rate units (450‐ 550) Use townhomes to transition to residential  neighborhood Third Place Plaza with civic or community  building New hillside path on Sunset Blvd east of  Harrington New Mixed‐Use Highlands Library at Sunset  Terrace Neighborhood residential infill Disperse townhomes and apartments Third Place incorporated into new retail Close portion of Harrington as green  street/open space Office Build Sunset Terrace site to zoning capacity Flexible Community Services Center Transpo Hub: improved bus stops, carsharing,  and bike storage Community Center ALTERNATIVE 3:  High Intensity Improvements Housing Development Urban Form Sunset Terrace Amenities Street Network,  Pedestrian Realm Non‐Residential Development Infill on vacant RHA properties No improvement No improvement No improvement None 1:1 Public Housing replacement (100 units) Focus density along Sunset Blvd New open space, e.g. active, garden, other Improved intersection and crossing at Sunset  Blvd and Harrington Neighborhood Retail New affordable and market rate units (250‐ 350) Focus density at Sunset Blvd/ Harrington  intersection and north on Harrington New rainwater park Green connection/ bioswale along Harrington New stand alone Highlands Library at Sunset  Terrace New affordable and market rate units (450‐ 550) Use townhomes to transition to residential  neighborhood Third Place Plaza with civic or community  building New hillside path on Sunset Blvd east of  Harrington New Mixed‐Use Highlands Library at Sunset  Terrace Neighborhood residential infill Disperse townhomes and apartments Third Place incorporated into new retail Close portion of Harrington as green  street/open space Office Build Sunset Terrace site to zoning capacity Flexible Community Services Center Transpo Hub: improved bus stops, carsharing,  and bike storage Community Center Scoping Meeting September 1, 2010 Sunset Boulevard NE ALTERNATIVE 1:  No Action Traffic Capacity and  Operations Improvements Pedestrian Walkability Community Based Design  Amenities Bikes Transit Enhancements Access Management  Measures No improvements No improvements No improvements No improvements No improvements No improvements Optimize traffic signal timing Pedestrian supportive signals  (countdown heads and audible signals)Preserve existing street trees Bike route signage New shelters Consolidate driveways Left turn storage lengthened to meet  design year LOS Improved side street sidewalk  connections to intersections Plant new street trees in landscape  strip along corridor Bike storage lockers Special design of transit zones  throughout the corridor including  paving, shelters, street furniture. Curbed median to restrict left turns  from driveways Traffic signal interconnection and  coordination Pedestrian refuges in median Use special paving for crosswalks Bicycle detection at signals Special concrete bus pad in roadway at  transit stops Landscaped medians Strategic capacity improvements at  intersections Narrow lanes and reduce crossing  distances Use special paving within intersections Narrow inside lanes, widen outside  lane to accommodate bikes Transit Signal Priority (TSP) Directional left‐turn pockets mid‐block Realignment of skewed intersections Bulb‐out curb returns at minor streets Way finding and signage Narrow lanes, stripe a bike lane  (requires WSDOT approval) New local transit service connecting  across SR900 to Community  Center/Library  Provide U‐turn accommodations Roundabout features at intersections Hillside walk paved path and planting Incorporate Art Provide multi‐use trail along the  corridor. Business Access Road EB from 10th  Street to Monroe Ave Widen to add Business Access/Transit  Lane Multi‐use trail along project corridor Garden / Art Trellis Widen Sunset Blvd to accommodate 5'  bike lanes Realign skewed intersections and  reduce crosswalk distances Benches, trash and recycling  receptacles Comfortable separation of pedestrians  from vehicle traffic (landscape buffer)Improve corridor roadway lighting Widen sidewalks to meet Complete  Streets minimums (8 ft sidewalks and 8  ft landscape strips) Special pedestrian scale lighting Surveillance cameras for increased  security and/or emergency response. ALTERNATIVE 2:  Mid‐Range Intensity Improvements Traffic Capacity and  Operations Improvements Pedestrian Walkability Community Based Design  Amenities Bikes Transit Enhancements Access Management  Measures No improvements No improvements No improvements No improvements No improvements No improvements Optimize traffic signal timing Pedestrian supportive signals  (countdown heads and audible signals)Preserve existing street trees Bike route signage New shelters Consolidate driveways Left turn storage lengthened to meet  design year LOS Improved side street sidewalk  connections to intersections Plant new street trees in landscape  strip along corridor Bike storage lockers Special design of transit zones  throughout the corridor including  paving, shelters, street furniture. Curbed median to restrict left turns  from driveways Traffic signal interconnection and  coordination Pedestrian refuges in median Use special paving for crosswalks Bicycle detection at signals Special concrete bus pad in roadway at  transit stops Landscaped medians Strategic capacity improvements at  intersections Narrow lanes and reduce crossing  distances Use special paving within intersections Narrow inside lanes, widen outside  lane to accommodate bikes Transit Signal Priority (TSP) Directional left‐turn pockets mid‐block Realignment of skewed intersections Bulb‐out curb returns at minor streets Way finding and signage Narrow lanes, stripe a bike lane  (requires WSDOT approval) New local transit service connecting  across SR900 to Community  Center/Library  Provide U‐turn accommodations Roundabout features at intersections Hillside walk paved path and planting Incorporate Art Provide multi‐use trail along the  corridor. Business Access Road EB from 10th  Street to Monroe Ave Widen to add Business Access/Transit  Lane Multi‐use trail along project corridor Garden / Art Trellis Widen Sunset Blvd to accommodate 5'  bike lanes Realign skewed intersections and  reduce crosswalk distances Benches, trash and recycling  receptacles Comfortable separation of pedestrians  from vehicle traffic (landscape buffer)Improve corridor roadway lighting Widen sidewalks to meet Complete  Streets minimums (8 ft sidewalks and 8  ft landscape strips) Special pedestrian scale lighting Surveillance cameras for increased  security and/or emergency response. ALTERNATIVE 3:  High Intensity Improvements Traffic Capacity and  Operations Improvements Pedestrian Walkability Community Based Design  Amenities Bikes Transit Enhancements Access Management  Measures No improvements No improvements No improvements No improvements No improvements No improvements Optimize traffic signal timing Pedestrian supportive signals  (countdown heads and audible signals)Preserve existing street trees Bike route signage New shelters Consolidate driveways Left turn storage lengthened to meet  design year LOS Improved side street sidewalk  connections to intersections Plant new street trees in landscape  strip along corridor Bike storage lockers Special design of transit zones  throughout the corridor including  paving, shelters, street furniture. Curbed median to restrict left turns  from driveways Traffic signal interconnection and  coordination Pedestrian refuges in median Use special paving for crosswalks Bicycle detection at signals Special concrete bus pad in roadway at  transit stops Landscaped medians Strategic capacity improvements at  intersections Narrow lanes and reduce crossing  distances Use special paving within intersections Narrow inside lanes, widen outside  lane to accommodate bikes Transit Signal Priority (TSP) Directional left‐turn pockets mid‐block Realignment of skewed intersections Bulb‐out curb returns at minor streets Way finding and signage Narrow lanes, stripe a bike lane  (requires WSDOT approval) New local transit service connecting  across SR900 to Community  Center/Library  Provide U‐turn accommodations Roundabout features at intersections Hillside walk paved path and planting Incorporate Art Provide multi‐use trail along the  corridor. Business Access Road EB from 10th  Street to Monroe Ave Widen to add Business Access/Transit  Lane Multi‐use trail along project corridor Garden / Art Trellis Widen Sunset Blvd to accommodate 5'  bike lanes Realign skewed intersections and  reduce crosswalk distances Benches, trash and recycling  receptacles Comfortable separation of pedestrians  from vehicle traffic (landscape buffer)Improve corridor roadway lighting Widen sidewalks to meet Complete  Streets minimums (8 ft sidewalks and 8  ft landscape strips) Special pedestrian scale lighting Surveillance cameras for increased  security and/or emergency response. Sunset Area Planned Action EIS Alternative Development Matrix Scoping Meeting September 1, 2010 Stormwater Management ALTERNATIVE 1:  No Action Parcel‐Based Stormwater  Requirements Sunset Terrace Stormwater  Techniques Conveyance Improvements  in ROW Flow Control BMPs in ROW Water Quality Treatment  BMPs in ROW Open Space/Sub‐regional  Facilities Meet Code Requirements On‐site Meet Code Requirements On‐site No improvements No improvements No improvements No improvements Incentivize Green Stormwater  Infrastructure Retrofits Downspout Disconnection Rebuild Curb & Gutter Permeable Pavement Sidewalks Media Filter Vaults Rainwater Parks (e.g. rain gardens) Require Green Stormwater  Infrastructure where Infiltration is  Feasible Pop‐up Emitter for Downspouts Grass‐Swale Conveyance Permeable Pavement in Parking Stalls Bioretention planters Regional Detention Ponds Require Green Stormwater  Infrastructure including non‐ infiltrating practices Raingardens for Residential Units Bioretention Swale/Planters with  Curb Openings Permeable pavement in Travelled  Way Rain Gardens in medians Underground Detention Require On‐site Green Stormwater  Infrastructrue for WQ Treatment Permeable Sidewalks Build/Rebuild Storm Drain Pipes Bioretention Swales Permeable Pavement Water Quality  Treatment Sportsfield/Playfield Detention  (detention during wet season only) Require On‐site Retention to  Performance Standard (e.g. 2‐year)Permeable Pavement Driveways Bioretention Planters with Detention Allow parcel stormwater treatment  within ROW New Rainwater Park at Sunset  Terrace Allow Zero Discharge of Runoff Off‐ Site Cisterns for Residential Units Rain Gardens in medians Rainwater Harvesting for Irrigation  Use Allow Fee In‐lieu of Providing On‐site  Detention Green Roofs Detention Swales Effective Impervious Area Caps Harrington Street Green Connection Underground Cisterns for Street  Irrigation Green Parking Lot Standards Rainwater Harvesting Develop narrow street standards to  reduce impervious coverage Detention Tanks/Vaults within ROW ALTERNATIVE 2:  Mid‐Range Intensity Improvements Parcel‐Based Stormwater  Requirements Sunset Terrace Stormwater  Techniques Conveyance Improvements  in ROW Flow Control BMPs in ROW Water Quality Treatment  BMPs in ROW Open Space/Sub‐regional  Facilities Meet Code Requirements On‐site Meet Code Requirements On‐site No improvements No improvements No improvements No improvements Incentivize Green Stormwater  Infrastructure Retrofits Downspout Disconnection Rebuild Curb & Gutter Permeable Pavement Sidewalks Media Filter Vaults Rainwater Parks (e.g. rain gardens) Require Green Stormwater  Infrastructure where Infiltration is  Feasible Pop‐up Emitter for Downspouts Grass‐Swale Conveyance Permeable Pavement in Parking Stalls Bioretention planters Regional Detention Ponds Require Green Stormwater  Infrastructure including non‐ infiltrating practices Raingardens for Residential Units Bioretention Swale/Planters with  Curb Openings Permeable pavement in Travelled  Way Rain Gardens in medians Underground Detention Require On‐site Green Stormwater  Infrastructrue for WQ Treatment Permeable Sidewalks Build/Rebuild Storm Drain Pipes Bioretention Swales Permeable Pavement Water Quality  Treatment Sportsfield/Playfield Detention  (detention during wet season only) Require On‐site Retention to  Performance Standard (e.g. 2‐year)Permeable Pavement Driveways Bioretention Planters with Detention Allow parcel stormwater treatment  within ROW New Rainwater Park at Sunset  Terrace Allow Zero Discharge of Runoff Off‐ Site Cisterns for Residential Units Rain Gardens in medians Rainwater Harvesting for Irrigation  Use Allow Fee In‐lieu of Providing On‐site  Detention Green Roofs Detention Swales Effective Impervious Area Caps Harrington Street Green Connection Underground Cisterns for Street  Irrigation Green Parking Lot Standards Rainwater Harvesting Develop narrow street standards to  reduce impervious coverage Detention Tanks/Vaults within ROW ALTERNATIVE 3:  High Intensity Improvements Parcel‐Based Stormwater  Requirements Sunset Terrace Stormwater  Techniques Conveyance Improvements  in ROW Flow Control BMPs in ROW Water Quality Treatment  BMPs in ROW Open Space/Sub‐regional  Facilities Meet Code Requirements On‐site Meet Code Requirements On‐site No improvements No improvements No improvements No improvements Incentivize Green Stormwater  Infrastructure Retrofits Downspout Disconnection Rebuild Curb & Gutter Permeable Pavement Sidewalks Media Filter Vaults Rainwater Parks (e.g. rain gardens) Require Green Stormwater  Infrastructure where Infiltration is  Feasible Pop‐up Emitter for Downspouts Grass‐Swale Conveyance Permeable Pavement in Parking Stalls Bioretention planters Regional Detention Ponds Require Green Stormwater  Infrastructure including non‐ infiltrating practices Raingardens for Residential Units Bioretention Swale/Planters with  Curb Openings Permeable pavement in Travelled  Way Rain Gardens in medians Underground Detention Require On‐site Green Stormwater  Infrastructrue for WQ Treatment Permeable Sidewalks Build/Rebuild Storm Drain Pipes Bioretention Swales Permeable Pavement Water Quality  Treatment Sportsfield/Playfield Detention  (detention during wet season only) Require On‐site Retention to  Performance Standard (e.g. 2‐year)Permeable Pavement Driveways Bioretention Planters with Detention Allow parcel stormwater treatment  within ROW New Rainwater Park at Sunset  Terrace Allow Zero Discharge of Runoff Off‐ Site Cisterns for Residential Units ` Rain Gardens in medians Rainwater Harvesting for Irrigation  Use Allow Fee In‐lieu of Providing On‐site  Detention Green Roofs Detention Swales Effective Impervious Area Caps Harrington Street Green Connection Underground Cisterns for Street  Irrigation Green Parking Lot Standards Rainwater Harvesting Develop narrow street standards to  reduce impervious coverage Detention Tanks/Vaults within ROW Sunset Area Planned Action EIS Alternative Development Matrix     Summary of the Scoping Process  November 2010 ICF 00593.10     Attachment C  USEPA Comment Letter    Appendix B Land Capacity Analysis     Sunset Area Community Planned Action  Environmental Impact Statement B‐1 December 2010 ICF 593.10     Appendix B. Land Capacity Analysis    Data and Assumptions  The purpose of the land capacity analysis is to document the calculation of growth numbers for  alternatives.  The methodology identifies possible development and redevelopment opportunities,  but ultimately the level of growth will be based on individual property owner decisions and market  forces within the framework of City zoning and other development regulations.  The methods rely on 2007 Buildable Lands spreadsheets provided by Michael Hubner of Suburban  Cities Association and address vacant and redevelopable lands within the Sunset Area Community  Planned Action Study Area.    King County parcel data as of 2010 was used to prepare draft maps and identify parcels within the  various zones that are categorized as vacant, redevelopable, and developed.  In addition, King  County data was used to eliminate other parcels from consideration in the buildable lands analysis,  such as religious institutions, government or institutional facilities similar to the 2007 Buildable  Lands analysis.  However, Renton Housing Authority (RHA) parcels were not excluded.  King County IMap and aerial photos were reviewed to verify status on parcels and to categorize  parcels that did not have enough information in King County’s data to assess a category.  King County parcel data (2010) was also used to provide existing development figures such as  dwelling units and commercial square footage, which were subtracted from redevelopable parcels.    Summary of Land Capacity Findings  Table 1 below provides a draft land capacity analysis broken into subareas.   See Draft EIS Figure 2‐1  for a map of the subareas and Draft EIS Figure 2‐3 for a zoning map.  The attached spreadsheet  provides a breakdown of capacity by zoning districts.  City of Renton Appendix B   Sunset Area Community Planned Action  Environmental Impact Statement B‐2 December 2010 ICF 593.10   Table 1. Summary of Land Capacity – Net Additional Growth above Existing  Subarea  Dwelling Units/Jobs  Alternative 1  Alternative 2 1 Alternative 3  Potential Sunset Terrace  Redevelopment   Dwelling units  168–175 2  310  479  Jobs 493 164 182  Sunset Mixed Use   Dwelling units  1,109  1,052  1,509  Jobs 410–652 1,728 2,875  Central, North and South   Dwelling units  206  296  518  Jobs 152–213 273 273  Total Study Area  Dwelling units 3  1,483–1,490  1,658  2,506  Population4  3,430‐3,442  3,830  5,789  Employment SF 251,700 844,351 1,310,113  Jobs6 611–9147 2,165 3,330  1  The Draft EIS technical analysis for transportation, water, and sewer models studied two more net  units in the Potential Sunset Terrace Redevelopment Subarea under Alternatives 1 and 3, and a slightly  different mix of dwellings and jobs in the Potential Sunset Terrace Redevelopment Subarea under  Alternative 2 (12 more dwellings and 38 fewer jobs). These differences are negligible and represent a  less than 2% difference across the Planned Action Study Area.  2  The lower range represents proposed concepts on RHA’s two vacant sites based on funding  applications currently in process. The upper range represents the results of a land capacity analysis.  3  The estimate is based on a 90%/10% housing/employment split between residential and service uses;  the housing/employment share based on example proposed developments prepared for RHA’s two  vacant sites in the Sunset Terrace subarea.  4  Includes 217 dwellings and approximately 8 jobs associated with Harrington Square constructed in  Summer 2010.  5 Applies an average household size of 2.31, an average of two census tracts 252 and 254.   6  Includes retail, service, and education jobs.  7  The lower figure shown is based on a commercial employment rate of 400 square feet per employee for  retail and service jobs. If applying a commercial employment rate of 250 square feet per employee, the  employment would equal the upper range. This latter figure is more similar to Renton Transportation  Zone assumptions.   Alternative 1 reflects existing assumptions in the 2007 King County Buildable Lands Report as  applied to the adopted zoning and Alternative 3 modifies some of the residential‐commercial mix  assumptions of the 2007 King County Buildable Lands Report and adds properties that could be  redeveloped.  These present the bookends.  Alternative 2 represents moderate growth within the  bookends, by refining Alternative 3 assumptions. The relationship of the land capacity assumptions  to the bookends is addressed later in this memo.   Alternative 1  Generally speaking, the existing buildable lands methodology developed by King County and the City  of Renton was applied to 2010 King County parcel data to produce Alternative 1 figures for dwelling  units and jobs.  The 2007 Buildable Lands included the following assumptions for relevant zones  listed in Table 2:  City of Renton Appendix B   Sunset Area Community Planned Action  Environmental Impact Statement B‐3 December 2010 ICF 593.10   Table 2. Alternative 1 Land Capacity Assumptions  Zone Assumed  Future  Residential  Densities  Assumed  Future FAR  (Non‐ Residential)  Mixed‐Use  Assumed  Future %  Residential‐%  Commercial  ROW % Public  Purpose %  Market  Factor (%) 1  R‐8  6.64  N/A  N/A  14.5%  11.5%  V = 10%,  R=15%  R‐10  8.44  N/A  N/A  14.5%  11.5%  V = 10%  R=15%  R‐14  12.34  N/A  N/A  5%  5%  V = 10%  R=15%  RM‐F  19.00  N/A  N/A  2%  1%  V = 10%  R=15%  CN  N/A  0.15  N/A  0%  0%  V = 10%  R=15%  CV  78.34  1.86  80%‐20%  0%  0%  V = 10%  R=15%  1 V= Vacant, properties with an improvement value of less than $5000  R=Redevelopable  Redevelopable – Single Family: Parcels with adequate acreage to accommodate future development  Redevelopable – Multifamily and Commercial: Properties with an improvement to land value of less than 0.5  The land capacity analysis applied the assumptions to eligible properties as follows:  z Vacant, redevelopable, and developed property classifications were generally consistent with  the 2007 Buildable Lands assumptions.  { Single‐family residential methods were used for R‐8 and R‐10 zones  { An assessment of improvement to land value of less than 0.5 was used for commercial and  multifamily zones.   { Parks, community centers, library, fire station, and churches were excluded from  calculations.  { The small parcels that make up the Walgreens site on Sunset Boulevard appeared as  “vacant.”  These were corrected to “developed” category.  { A handful of small access or associated parking parcels were also reclassified from “vacant”  to “developed” based upon a review of an aerial and information contained in King County  data.  z The Harrington Square project that is under construction is shown as a pipeline project with  217 dwelling units and 8 jobs (3,349 s.f. of commercial space divided by 400 s.f./employee  found in buildable lands).  Results were tabulated by subareas.  See Table 1 for a breakdown by subarea and the attachment for  a summary by zoning district.  City of Renton Appendix B   Sunset Area Community Planned Action  Environmental Impact Statement B‐4 December 2010 ICF 593.10   Alternative 3  For Alternative 3, the 2007 Buildable Lands methodology was adjusted to assume a greater level of  redevelopment along the NE Sunset Boulevard corridor on the Center Village (CV) zoned parcels  that were either categorized as redevelopable under Alternative 1 above, or newly categorized as  redevelopable using two methods: 1) a review of King County parcel data on age of structures (1990  or earlier) and review of aerial data in relation to existing assumed redevelopable parcels; and 2) a  draft methodology developed by the Suburban Cities Association that considers parcels with 25% of  the assumed future floor area ratio and a structure age older than 1995.    For purposes of Alternative 3, these parcels were called “CV2” and they were assumed to redevelop  with a 50% commercial‐50% residential mix in consideration of their orientation to Sunset  Boulevard.  A higher density redevelopment assumption was also applied in the R‐14 zoned “family village” area  identified in the Sunset Area Community Investment Strategy (CIS), and for the current Highlands  public library site recognizing possible density bonuses.  For these parcels alone, density was  assumed at 18 du/acre on the library site and 24 du/acre on the “family village” site. Also, the  market factor was removed to account for a complete transformation of these sites.   Additional detailed assumptions are described below.  Potential Sunset Terrace Redevelopment Subarea  For the Potential Sunset Terrace Redevelopment Subarea, the Bumgardner Architecture Concept  Master Plan (Draft EIS Figure 2‐10) was used to develop the total.    z The number of dwelling units was included from the new development summary shown on  Bumgardner’s Sunset Terrace Redevelopment:  Concept Master Plan.  z Commercial building square footages were taken from the Sunset Terrace Redevelopment:   Concept Master Plan and translated to jobs using the average of the City of Renton’s Buildable  Lands employees/square foot range of 250‐400.  The figure used for this calculation was  approximately 325 employees/square foot.  z Employment estimates using this process varies between 97 employees and 182 depending  upon whether or not the 27,500 s.f. of community space is considered in the employment mix.  North Subarea  The “family village” redevelopment concept would, if implemented, redevelop RHA property and  contiguous School District and City park properties located in the North Subarea (total of  approximately 15 acres).  Assumptions for this redevelopment included:  z Apply 24du/acre in R‐14 zone (considered a practical maximum for townhouse densities;  allowed with density bonus provisions for affordable housing),  z Eliminate the market factor for this redevelopment since it is assumed to occur on this single  parcel.  z Deduct approximately 3 acres of land as an estimate for education facility and park space in the  redevelopment.  City of Renton Appendix B   Sunset Area Community Planned Action  Environmental Impact Statement B‐5 December 2010 ICF 593.10   Central Subarea  The existing site of the Highlands Branch Public Library is expected to redevelop with housing once  the library is moved to the redeveloped Sunset Terrace site.  Assumptions for redevelopment of the  library site (approximately 1.4 acres, when excluding the associated alley extending north of the  library site) include:  z Apply maximum 18 du/acre allowed in R‐14 zone (allowed with density bonus provisions for  affordable housing and community facilities),  z Eliminate the market factor for this redevelopment since it is assumed to occur on this single  parcel.  Alternative 2 and the Bookends  Alternative 3 is considered to be an upper bookend for the analysis.  It provides a best‐case scenario  for employment and residential growth.  It captures a range of land use options included in the  Renton Sunset Area Community Investment Strategy such as the Sunset Terrace redevelopment and  the “family village” concept.  Alternative 1 is considered to be a lower bookend. It recognizes more  incremental infill redevelopment of vacant and selected properties that appear to have a  combination of land and improvement values that could result in redevelopment that takes  advantage of adopted zoning.  Alternative 2 is a mid‐range option that includes the following  assumptions:  z a similar amount of redevelopable acreage as Alternative 3, excluding the family village concept  and increasing the amount of acres that could be acquired for public parks and recreation  z a lower intensity Sunset Terrace redevelopment, and   z a reduced density and floor area ratio on remaining properties (e.g. .a density in the range of the  minimum and maximum 20‐80 du/ac respectively, and a FAR of less than 1.86 – specifically an  average density of approximately 69 dwellings per acre and an FAR of approximately 1.5).  Attachment – Land Capacity by Zone  Land capacity by zone is shown on the attached spreadsheets.  Land Capacity Results Alternative 1 Alternative 2 Alternative 3 A BCD A BCD A BCD Vacant Land Redevelo pable Land Total Vacant Land Redevelo pable Land Total Vacant Land Redevelo pable Land Total Single-Family Single-Family Single-Family R-10 10 0 11 R-10 10 0 10 R-10 10 0 10 R-14 6 27 33 R-14 3 96 99 R-14 3 318 321 Subtotal 16 27 43 Sunset Terrace R-14 n/a 0 Sunset Terrace R-14 66 Subtotal 13 96 109 Subtotal 13 324 338 Multifamily RM-F 20 5 26 Multifamily Multifamily Subtotal 20 5 26 RM-F 20 5 26 RM-F 20 5 26 Subtotal 20 5 26 Subtotal 20 5 26 Mixed-Use CV 265 938 1,203 Mixed-Use Mixed-Use Capacity in pipeline 217 217 CV 42 131 173 CV 65 314 379 Subtotal 265 1,155 1,420 CV2 14 808 821 CV2 18 1,054 1,072 Total 1,489 Sunset Terrace CV 0 312 312 Sunset Terrace CV 0 475 475 Capacity in pipeline 217 217 Capacity in pipeline 217 217 Subtotal 55 1,468 1,523 Subtotal 83 2,060 2,143 Vacant Land Redevelo pable Land Total Total 1,658 Total 2,507 Commercial CN 7310 Vacant Land Redevelo pable Land Total Vacant Land Redevelo pable Land Total Subtotal 7310 Commercial Commercial Mixed-Use CN 426 CN 426 CV 146 699 845 Subtotal 426 Subtotal 426 Capacity in pipeline 88 Subtotal 146 707 853 Mixed-Use Mixed-Use CV 27 50 76 CV 42 168 210 Total 153 710 863 CV2 29 1,729 1,759 CV2 46 2,726 2,772 Education 51 Sunset Terrace 0 164 164 Sunset Terrace 000 New total 914 Capacity in pipeline 88 Capacity in pipeline 88 Subtotal 56 1,951 2,007 Subtotal 89 2,902 2,990 Total 2,013 Total 3,178 Education 152 Education 152 New total 2,165 New total 3,330 Zoning Employment Capacity (Jobs) on: Zoning Employment Capacity (Jobs) on: Zoning Employment Capacity (Jobs) on: Zoning Housing Capacity (Units) on: Zoning Housing Capacity (Units) on: Zoning Housing Capacity (Units) on: Appendix C Draft Planned Action Ordinance   December 2010 - DRAFT Planned Action Ordinance - Sunset Area Planned Action EIS 1 ORDINANCE NO.________ AN ORDINANCE of the City Council of the City of Renton, Washington, establishing a Planned Action for the Sunset Area Community pursuant to the State Environmental Policy Act WHEREAS, the State Environmental Policy Act (“SEPA”) and implementing rules provide for the integration of environmental review with land use planning and project review through designation of “Planned Actions” by jurisdictions planning under the Growth Management Act, RCW 36.70A (“GMA”); and WHEREAS, the City has adopted a Comprehensive Plan complying with the GMA; and WHEREAS, the City has engaged in extensive subarea planning for the Sunset Area and has adopted a Community Investment Strategy to guide the area’s growth and redevelopment, and revitalization of the Sunset Area is desirable and in the best interest of the City; and WHEREAS, the City has adopted regulations and design guidelines for the Sunset Area; and WHEREAS, the Sunset Area includes the Sunset Terrace public housing project which will be proposed for redevelopment by the Renton Housing Authority; and WHEREAS, the Sunset Area Community Planned Action EIS identifies impacts and mitigation measures associated with planned development in the area; and WHEREAS, the City has adopted development regulations which will help protect the environment, and has adopted zoning regulations specific to the Sunset area which will guide the amount, location, form, and quality of desired development; and WHEREAS, designation of a Planned Action expedites the permitting process for subsequent, implementing projects whose impacts have been previously addressed in a Planned Action environmental impact statement (“EIS”), and thereby encourages desired growth and economic development; and WHEREAS, the Sunset Area Community is deemed to be appropriate for designation of a Planned Action. NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON, DOES HEREBY ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS: December 2010 - DRAFT Planned Action Ordinance - Sunset Area Planned Action EIS 2 SECTION 1. - Purpose. The City Council declares that the purposes of this ordinance are to: A. Combine analysis of environmental impacts with the City’s development of plans and regulations; B. Designate the Sunset Area Community as a Planned Action for purposes of environmental review and permitting of subsequent, implementing projects pursuant to the State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA), RCW 43.21C.031; C. Determine that the EIS prepared for the Sunset Area Community meets the requirements of a Planned Action EIS pursuant to SEPA; D. Establish criteria and procedures, consistent with state law, that will determine whether subsequent, implementing projects qualify as Planned Actions; E. Provide the public with information about Planned Actions and how the City will process applications for implementing projects; F. Streamline and expedite the land use review and approval process for qualifying projects by relying on the EIS completed for the Planned Action; and G. Apply the City’s development regulations together with the mitigation measures described in the EIS and this Ordinance to address the impacts of future development contemplated by the Planned Action. SECTION 2. – Findings. The City Council finds as follows: A. The City is subject to the requirements of the Growth Management Act (GMA, RCW 36.70A), and is located within an Urban Growth Area; B. The City has adopted a Comprehensive Plan complying with the GMA, and is amending the Comprehensive Plan to address transportation improvements and capital facilities specific to the Sunset Area C. The City has adopted a Community Investment Strategy, development regulations and design guidelines specific to the Sunset Area which will guide growth and revitalization of the area, including the Sunset Terrace public housing project; D. The City has prepared an EIS for the Sunset Area (“Sunset Area Community Planned Action EIS”), and finds that this EIS adequately addresses the probable significant environmental impacts associated with the type and amount of development planned to occur in the designated Planned Action area; E. The mitigation measures identified in the Planned Action EIS and attached to this ordinance as Exhibit B, together with adopted City development regulations, will December 2010 - DRAFT Planned Action Ordinance - Sunset Area Planned Action EIS 3 adequately mitigate significant impacts from development within the Planned Action area; F. The Comprehensive Plan and Planned Action EIS identify the location, type and amount of development that is contemplated by the Planned Action; G. Future projects that are implemented consistent with the Planned Action will protect the environment, benefit the public and enhance economic development; H. The City has provided numerous opportunities for meaningful public involvement in the proposed Planned Action, has considered all comments received, and, as appropriate, has modified the proposal or mitigation measures in response to comments; I. The Sunset Area Planned Action is not an essential public facility as defined by RCW 36.70A.200(1); J. The Planned Action area applies to a defined area that is smaller than the overall City boundaries; and K. Public services and facilities are adequate to serve the proposed Planned Action. SECTION 3. - Procedures and Criteria for Evaluating and Determining Projects as Planned Actions. A. Planned Action Area. The Planned Action designation shall apply to the area shown in Exhibit A. B. Environmental Document. A Planned Action determination for a site-specific implementing project application shall be based on the environmental analysis contained in the Draft EIS issued by the City on ________and the Final EIS published on _________. The Draft and Final EISs shall comprise the Planned Action EIS. The mitigation measures contained in Exhibit B are based upon the findings of the Planned Action EIS and shall, along with adopted City regulations, provide the framework that the City will use to impose appropriate conditions on qualifying Planned Action projects. C. Planned Action Designated. Land uses and activities described in the Planned Action EIS, subject to the thresholds described in subsection 3.D and the mitigation measures contained in Exhibit B, are designated Planned Actions or Planned Action Projects pursuant to RCW 43.21C.031. A development application for a site-specific Planned Action project located within the Sunset Area shall be designated a Planned Action if it meets the criteria set forth in subsection 3.D of this ordinance and applicable laws, codes, development regulations and standards of the City. December 2010 - DRAFT Planned Action Ordinance - Sunset Area Planned Action EIS 4 D. Planned Action Qualifications. The following thresholds shall be used to determine if a site-specific development proposed within the Sunset Area is contemplated by the Planned Action and has had its environmental impacts evaluated in the Planned Action EIS: (1) Land Use. (a) The following general categories/types of land uses, which are identified in RMC 4-2-060 as permitted or conditionally permitted in zoning districts applicable to the planned action area within the Sunset Area, are considered Planned Actions: Single family and multi-family residential; schools; parks; community and public facilities; office and conference; retail; entertainment and recreation; services; utilities; and mixed-use development incorporating more than one use category where permitted. (b) Individual land uses considered as Planned Actions shall include those uses specifically listed in RMC 4-2-060 as permitted or conditionally permitted in the zoning classifications applied to properties within the Planned Action area provided they are consistent with the general categories/types of land uses in (1)(a). (2) Development Thresholds. (a) The following amount of various new land uses are anticipated by the Planned Action: [blanks would be filled with land use estimates based on Land Use Development Amount Residential _________units Schools _________acres Parks _________acres Office/Service _________gross square feet Retail _________gross square feet Utilities Total Development (b) Shifting development amounts between categories of uses may be permitted so long as the total build-out does not exceed the aggregate amount of development and trip generation reviewed in the EIS, and so long as the impacts of that development have been identified in the Planned Action EIS and are mitigated consistent with Exhibit B. (c) If future development proposals in the Sunset Planned Action area exceed the development thresholds specified in this ordinance, further environmental review may be required pursuant to WAC 197-11-172. Further, if proposed development would alter the assumptions and analysis in the Planned Action EIS, further environmental review may be required. December 2010 - DRAFT Planned Action Ordinance - Sunset Area Planned Action EIS 5 (3) Building Height. Building height shall not exceed those permitted by the applicable zoning district, as permitted in the Renton Municipal Code. (4) Transportation. (a) Trip Ranges & Thresholds. The number of new PM Peak Hour Trips anticipated in the Planned Action Area and reviewed in the EIS are as follows: Total PM Peak Hour Trips Tbd Uses or activities that would exceed these maximum trip levels will require additional SEPA review. (b) Concurrency. The determination of transportation impacts shall be based on the City’s concurrency management program contained in RMC 4-6-070. (c) Off-Site Mitigation. As provided in the EIS and RMC 4-6-070, in order to mitigate transportation related impacts, all Planned Action Projects shall pay an environmental mitigation fee to participate in and pay a proportionate share of off-site improvements unless otherwise waived by the City Council. Off-site improvements are identified in Attachment B. (d) Director Discretion. The Director of Community and Economic Development or his/her designee shall have discretion to determine incremental and total trip generation, consistent with the Institute of Traffic Engineers (ITE) Trip Generation Manual (latest edition) or an alternative manual accepted by the Director at his sole discretion, for each project permit application proposed under this Planned Action. (5) Elements of the Environment and Degree of Impacts. A proposed project that would result in a significant change in the type or degree of impacts to any of the elements of the environment analyzed in the Planned Action EIS, shall not qualify as a Planned Action. (6) Changed Conditions. Should environmental conditions change significantly from those analyzed in the Planned Action EIS, the City’s SEPA Responsible Official may determine that the Planned Action designation is no longer applicable until supplemental environmental review is conducted. E. Planned Action Review Criteria. (1) The City’s Environmental Review Committee may designate as “planned actions”, pursuant to RCW 43.21C.030, applications that meet all of the following conditions: (a) the proposal is located within the Planned Action area identified in Exhibit A of this ordinance; December 2010 - DRAFT Planned Action Ordinance - Sunset Area Planned Action EIS 6 (b) the proposed uses and activities are consistent with those described in the Planned Action EIS and Section 3.D of this ordinance; (c) the proposal is within the Planned Action thresholds and other criteria of Section 3.D of this ordinance; (d) the proposal is consistent with the City of Renton Comprehensive Plan and applicable zoning regulations; (e) the proposal’s significant adverse environmental impacts have been identified in the Planned Action EIS; (f) the proposal’s significant impacts have been mitigated by application of the measures identified in Exhibit B, and other applicable city regulations, together with any modifications or variances or special permits that may be required; (g) the proposal complies with all applicable local, state and/or federal laws and regulations, and the Environmental Review Committee determines that these constitute adequate mitigation; and (h) the proposal is not an essential public facility as defined by RCW 36.70A.200(1). (2) The City shall base its decision on review of a SEPA checklist, or an alternative form approved by the Department of Ecology, and review of the application and supporting documentation. (3) A proposal that meets the criteria of this section shall be considered to qualify and be designated as a planned action, consistent with the requirements or RCW 43.21C.030, WAC 197-11-164 et seq, and this ordinance. F. Effect of Planned Action. (1) Designation as a planned action project means that a qualifying proposal has been reviewed in accordance with this ordinance and found to be consistent with its development parameters and thresholds, and with the environmental analysis contained in the Planned Action EIS. (2) Upon determination by the City’s Environmental Review Committee that the proposal meets the criteria of Section 3.D and qualifies as a planned action, the proposal shall not require a SEPA threshold determination, preparation of an EIS, or be subject to further review pursuant to SEPA. G. Planned Action Permit Process. Applications for planned actions shall be reviewed pursuant to the following process. (1) Development applications shall meet all applicable requirements of the Renton Municipal Code (RMC). Applications for planned actions shall be made on forms provided by the City and shall include a SEPA checklist, or an approved Planned Action checklist. December 2010 - DRAFT Planned Action Ordinance - Sunset Area Planned Action EIS 7 (2) The City’s Development Services Division shall determine whether the application is complete as provided in RMC 4-8-100. (3) If the application is for a project within the Planned Action Area defined in Exhibit A, the application will be reviewed to determine if it is consistent with the criteria of this ordinance and thereby qualifies as a Planned Action project. The Environmental Review Committee shall notify the applicant of its decision. If the project is determined to qualify as a Planned Action, it shall proceed in accordance with the applicable permit review procedures specified in RMC 4-8-080G and 4-9, except that no SEPA threshold determination, EIS or additional SEPA review shall be required. The decision of the Environmental Review Committee regarding qualification as a Planned Action shall be final. (4) Public notice and review for projects that qualify as Planned Actions shall be tied to the underlying permit. The review process for the underlying permit shall be as provided in RMC 4-8-080G and 4-9. If notice is otherwise required for the underlying permit, the notice shall state that the project has qualified as a Planned Action. If notice is not otherwise required for the underlying permit, no special notice is required by this ordinance. (5) Development Agreement. To provide additional certainty about applicable requirements, the City or an applicant may request consideration and execution of a development agreement for a Planned Action project. The development agreement may address review procedures applicable to a planned action project, permitted uses, mitigation measures, payment of impact fees or provision of improvements through other methods, design standards, phasing, vesting of development rights, and/or any other topic that may properly be considered in a development agreement consistent with RCW 36.70B.170 et seq. (6) If a project is determined to not qualify as a Planned Action, the Environmental Review Committee shall so notify the applicant and prescribe a SEPA review procedure consistent with the City’s SEPA regulations and the requirements of state law. The notice shall describe the elements of the application that result in failure to qualify as a Planned Action. (7) Projects that fail to qualify as Planned Actions may incorporate or otherwise use relevant elements of the Planned Action EIS, as well as other relevant SEPA documents, to meet their SEPA requirements. The Environmental Review Committee may limit the scope of SEPA review for the non-qualifying project to those issues and environmental impacts not previously addressed in the Planned Action EIS. SECTION 4. - Monitoring and Review. A. The City shall monitor the progress of development in the designated Planned Action area to ensure that it is consistent with the assumptions of this ordinance and the Planned Action EIS regarding the type and amount of development and associated December 2010 - DRAFT Planned Action Ordinance - Sunset Area Planned Action EIS 8 impacts, and with the mitigation measures and improvements planned for the Sunset Area. B. This Planned Action Ordinance shall be reviewed no later than five years from its effective date by the Environmental Review Committee to determine the continuing relevance of its assumptions and findings with respect to environmental conditions in the Planned Action area, the impacts of development, and required mitigation measures. Based upon this review, the City may propose amendments to this ordinance and/or may supplement or revise the Planned Action EIS. SECTION 5. - Conflict. In the event of a conflict between this Ordinance or any mitigation measure imposed thereto, and any ordinance or regulation of the City, the provisions of this ordinance shall control EXCEPT that the provision of any Uniform Code shall supersede. SECTION 6. - Severability. Should any section, subsection, paragraph, sentence, clause or phrase of this Ordinance or its application be declared to be unconstitutional or invalid by a court of competent jurisdiction, such decision shall not affect the constitutionality or validity of the remaining portions of this ordinance or its application to any other person or situation. SECTION 7. - Effective Date. This ordinance, being an exercise of a power specifically delegated to the City legislative body, is not subject to referendum, and shall take effect five (5) days after its passage, approval and publication as provided by law. December 2010 - DRAFT Planned Action Ordinance - Sunset Area Planned Action EIS 9 EXHIBIT A PLANNED ACTION AREA [Proposed as Figure 2-1, Planned Action Study Area] December 2010 - DRAFT Planned Action Ordinance - Sunset Area Planned Action EIS 10 EXHIBIT B PLANNED ACTION EIS MITIGATION MEASURES [Will be based on mitigation measures as summarized in Chapter 1] Appendix D Environmental Health: EDR Report   FORM-PRM-ARB ®kcehCoeG htiw tropeR ™paM suidaR RDE ehT metsyS ®kcehCdleiF RDE eht gnisu deraperP 440 Wheelers Farms Road Milford, CT 06461 Toll Free: 800.352.0050 www.edrnet.com Sunset Terrace Senior Housing Center Development Sunset Lane NE at NE 10th St Renton, WA 98056 Inquiry Number: 2826208.2s July 28, 2010 SECTION PAGE Executive Summary ES1 Overview Map 2 Detail Map 3 Map Findings Summary 4 Map Findings 7 Orphan Summary 109 Government Records Searched/Data Currency Tracking GR-1 GEOCHECK ADDENDUM Physical Setting Source Addendum A-1 Physical Setting Source Summary A-2 Physical Setting SSURGO Soil Map A-6 Physical Setting Source Map A-11 Physical Setting Source Map Findings A-13 Physical Setting Source Records Searched A-19 TC2826208.2s Page 1 Thank you for your business. Please contact EDR at 1-800-352-0050 with any questions or comments. Disclaimer - Copyright and Trademark Notice The EDR FieldCheck System enables EDR’s customers to make certain online modifications to the maps and text contained in® EDR Radius Map Reports. As a result, the maps and text contained in this Report may have been so modified. EDR has not taken any action to verify any such modifications, and this report and the findings set forth herein must be read in light of this fact. The EDR FieldCheck System accesses user-modified records from previously submitted reports. Any user-modified record from a previous report that is plotted outside the search radius of this report may not be included in this report. This Report contains certain information obtained from a variety of public and other sources reasonably available to Environmental Data Resources, Inc. It cannot be concluded from this Report that coverage information for the target and surrounding properties does not exist from other sources. NO WARRANTY EXPRESSED OR IMPLIED, IS MADE WHATSOEVER IN CONNECTION WITH THIS REPORT. ENVIRONMENTAL DATA RESOURCES, INC. SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIMS THE MAKING OF ANY SUCH WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR USE OR PURPOSE. ALL RISK IS ASSUMED BY THE USER. IN NO EVENT SHALL ENVIRONMENTAL DATA RESOURCES, INC. BE LIABLE TO ANYONE, WHETHER ARISING OUT OF ERRORS OR OMISSIONS, NEGLIGENCE, ACCIDENT OR ANY OTHER CAUSE, FOR ANY LOSS OF DAMAGE, INCLUDING, WITHOUT LIMITATION, SPECIAL, INCIDENTAL, CONSEQUENTIAL, OR EXEMPLARY DAMAGES. ANY LIABILITY ON THE PART OF ENVIRONMENTAL DATA RESOURCES, INC. IS STRICTLY LIMITED TO A REFUND OF THE AMOUNT PAID FOR THIS REPORT. Purchaser accepts this Report "AS IS". Any analyses, estimates, ratings, environmental risk levels or risk codes provided in this Report are provided for illustrative purposes only, and are not intended to provide, nor should they be interpreted as providing any facts regarding, or prediction or forecast of, any environmental risk for any property. Only a Phase I Environmental Site Assessment performed by an environmental professional can provide information regarding the environmental risk for any property. Additionally, the information provided in this Report is not to be construed as legal advice. Copyright 2010 by Environmental Data Resources, Inc. All rights reserved. Reproduction in any media or format, in whole or in part, of any report or map of Environmental Data Resources, Inc., or its affiliates, is prohibited without prior written permission. EDR and its logos (including Sanborn and Sanborn Map) are trademarks of Environmental Data Resources, Inc. or its affiliates. All other trademarks used herein are the property of their respective owners. TABLE OF CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY TC2826208.2s EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 1 A search of the environmental records was conducted by Environmental Data Resources, Inc. (EDR). CH2M HILL, INC. used the EDR FieldCheck System to review and/or revise the results of this search, based on independent data verification by CH2M HILL, INC.. The report was designed to assist parties seeking to meet the search requirements of EPA’s Standards and Practices for All Appropriate Inquiries (40 CFR Part 312), the ASTM Standard Practice for Environmental Site Assessments (E 1527-05) or custom requirements developed for the evaluation of environmental risk associated with a parcel of real estate. TARGET PROPERTY INFORMATION ADDRESS SUNSET LANE NE AT NE 10TH ST RENTON, WA 98056 COORDINATES 47.500700 - 47˚ 30’ 2.5’’Latitude (North): 122.181800 - 122˚ 10’ 54.5’’Longitude (West): Zone 10Universal Tranverse Mercator: 561622.4UTM X (Meters): 5260913.0UTM Y (Meters): 344 ft. above sea levelElevation: USGS TOPOGRAPHIC MAP ASSOCIATED WITH TARGET PROPERTY 47122-E2 MERCER ISLAND, WATarget Property Map: 1983Most Recent Revision: 47122-D2 RENTON, WASouth Map: 1994Most Recent Revision: AERIAL PHOTOGRAPHY IN THIS REPORT 2005, 2006Portions of Photo from: USDASource: TARGET PROPERTY SEARCH RESULTS The target property was not listed in any of the databases searched by EDR. DATABASES WITH NO MAPPED SITES No sites were identified in following databases. STANDARD ENVIRONMENTAL RECORDS Federal NPL site list Proposed NPL Proposed National Priority List Sites EXECUTIVE SUMMARY TC2826208.2s EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 2 NPL LIENS Federal Superfund Liens Federal Delisted NPL site list Delisted NPL National Priority List Deletions Federal CERCLIS list CERCLIS Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Information System FEDERAL FACILITY Federal Facility Site Information listing Federal CERCLIS NFRAP site List CERC-NFRAP CERCLIS No Further Remedial Action Planned Federal RCRA CORRACTS facilities list CORRACTS Corrective Action Report Federal RCRA non-CORRACTS TSD facilities list RCRA-TSDF RCRA - Treatment, Storage and Disposal Federal RCRA generators list RCRA-LQG RCRA - Large Quantity Generators Federal institutional controls / engineering controls registries US ENG CONTROLS Engineering Controls Sites List US INST CONTROL Sites with Institutional Controls Federal ERNS list ERNS Emergency Response Notification System State and tribal landfill and/or solid waste disposal site lists SWF/LF Solid Waste Facility Database State and tribal leaking storage tank lists LUST Leaking Underground Storage Tanks Site List INDIAN LUST Leaking Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land State and tribal registered storage tank lists AST Aboveground Storage Tank Locations INDIAN UST Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land FEMA UST Underground Storage Tank Listing State and tribal institutional control / engineering control registries INST CONTROL Institutional Control Site List State and tribal voluntary cleanup sites INDIAN VCP Voluntary Cleanup Priority Listing EXECUTIVE SUMMARY TC2826208.2s EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 3 State and tribal Brownfields sites BROWNFIELDS Brownfields Sites Listing ADDITIONAL ENVIRONMENTAL RECORDS Local Brownfield lists US BROWNFIELDS A Listing of Brownfields Sites Local Lists of Landfill / Solid Waste Disposal Sites ODI Open Dump Inventory DEBRIS REGION 9 Torres Martinez Reservation Illegal Dump Site Locations SWTIRE Solid Waste Tire Facilities INDIAN ODI Report on the Status of Open Dumps on Indian Lands Local Lists of Hazardous waste / Contaminated Sites US CDL Clandestine Drug Labs CDL Clandestine Drug Lab Contaminated Site List HIST CDL List of Sites Contaminated by Clandestine Drug Labs US HIST CDL National Clandestine Laboratory Register Local Land Records LIENS 2 CERCLA Lien Information LUCIS Land Use Control Information System Records of Emergency Release Reports HMIRS Hazardous Materials Information Reporting System SPILLS Reported Spills Other Ascertainable Records DOT OPS Incident and Accident Data DOD Department of Defense Sites FUDS Formerly Used Defense Sites CONSENT Superfund (CERCLA) Consent Decrees UMTRA Uranium Mill Tailings Sites MINES Mines Master Index File TRIS Toxic Chemical Release Inventory System TSCA Toxic Substances Control Act FTTS FIFRA/ TSCA Tracking System - FIFRA (Federal Insecticide, Fungicide, & Rodenticide Act)/TSCA (Toxic Substances Control Act) HIST FTTS FIFRA/TSCA Tracking System Administrative Case Listing SSTS Section 7 Tracking Systems ICIS Integrated Compliance Information System PADS PCB Activity Database System MLTS Material Licensing Tracking System RADINFO Radiation Information Database FINDS Facility Index System/Facility Registry System EXECUTIVE SUMMARY TC2826208.2s EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 4 RAATS RCRA Administrative Action Tracking System UIC Underground Injection Wells Listing DRYCLEANERS Drycleaner List NPDES Water Quality Permit System Data AIRS Washington Emissions Data System INDIAN RESERV Indian Reservations SCRD DRYCLEANERS State Coalition for Remediation of Drycleaners Listing COAL ASH Coal Ash Disposal Site Listing PCB TRANSFORMER PCB Transformer Registration Database COAL ASH EPA Coal Combustion Residues Surface Impoundments List COAL ASH DOE Sleam-Electric Plan Operation Data EDR PROPRIETARY RECORDS EDR Proprietary Records Manufactured Gas Plants EDR Proprietary Manufactured Gas Plants SURROUNDING SITES: SEARCH RESULTS Surrounding sites were identified in the following databases. Elevations have been determined from the USGS Digital Elevation Model and should be evaluated on a relative (not an absolute) basis. Relative elevation information between sites of close proximity should be field verified. Sites with an elevation equal to or higher than the target property have been differentiated below from sites with an elevation lower than the target property. Page numbers and map identification numbers refer to the EDR Radius Map report where detailed data on individual sites can be reviewed. Sites listed in bold italics are in multiple databases. Unmappable (orphan) sites are not considered in the foregoing analysis. STANDARD ENVIRONMENTAL RECORDS Federal NPL site list NPL: Also known as Superfund, the National Priority List database is a subset of CERCLIS and identifies over 1,200 sites for priority cleanup under the Superfund program. The source of this database is the U.S. EPA. An online review and analysis by CH2M HILL, INC. of the NPL list, as provided by EDR, and dated 03/31/2010 has revealed that there is 1 NPL site within approximately 1 mile of the target property. PageMap IDDirection / Distance Address Equal/Higher Elevation ____________________ ________ ___________________ _____ _____ PACIFIC CAR & FOUNDRY CO. 1400 NORTH 4TH STREET SW 1/2 - 1 (0.713 mi.) 0 7 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY TC2826208.2s EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 5 Federal RCRA generators list RCRA-SQG: RCRAInfo is EPA’s comprehensive information system, providing access to data supporting the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) of 1976 and the Hazardous and Solid Waste Amendments (HSWA) of 1984. The database includes selective information on sites which generate, transport, store, treat and/or dispose of hazardous waste as defined by the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA). Small quantity generators (SQGs) generate between 100 kg and 1,000 kg of hazardous waste per month. An online review and analysis by CH2M HILL, INC. of the RCRA-SQG list, as provided by EDR, and dated 02/17/2010 has revealed that there is 1 RCRA-SQG site within approximately 0.25 miles of the target property. PageMap IDDirection / Distance Address Lower Elevation ____________________ ________ ___________________ _____ _____ COLPETTS DEVELOPMENT 936 HARRINGTON AVE NE S 1/8 - 1/4 (0.213 mi.) D19 68 RCRA-CESQG: RCRAInfo is EPA’s comprehensive information system, providing access to data supporting the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) of 1976 and the Hazardous and Solid Waste Amendments (HSWA) of 1984. The database includes selective information on sites which generate, transport, store, treat and/or dispose of hazardous waste as defined by the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA). Conditionally exempt small quantity generators (CESQGs) generate less than 100 kg of hazardous waste, or less than 1 kg of acutely hazardous waste per month. An online review and analysis by CH2M HILL, INC. of the RCRA-CESQG list, as provided by EDR, and dated 02/17/2010 has revealed that there is 1 RCRA-CESQG site within approximately 0.25 miles of the target property. PageMap IDDirection / Distance Address Equal/Higher Elevation ____________________ ________ ___________________ _____ _____ RENTON HIGHLANDER CENTER INC 2806 NE 10TH SE 0 - 1/8 (0.077 mi.) B9 45 State- and tribal - equivalent NPL HSL: The Hazardous Sites List is a subset of the CSCSL Report. It includes sites which have been assessed and ranked using the Washington Ranking Method (WARM). An online review and analysis by CH2M HILL, INC. of the HSL list, as provided by EDR, and dated 02/17/2010 has revealed that there is 1 HSL site within approximately 1 mile of the target property. PageMap IDDirection / Distance Address Equal/Higher Elevation ____________________ ________ ___________________ _____ _____ PACIFIC CAR & FOUNDRY CO. 1400 NORTH 4TH STREET SW 1/2 - 1 (0.713 mi.) 0 7 Facility Type: Hazardous Sites List State- and tribal - equivalent CERCLIS CSCSL: The State Hazardous Waste Sites records are the states’ equivalent to CERCLIS. These sites may or may not already be listed on the federal CERCLIS list. Priority sites planned for cleanup using state funds (state equivalent of Superfund) are identified along with sites where cleanup will be paid for by EXECUTIVE SUMMARY TC2826208.2s EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 6 potentially responsible parties. The data come from the Department of Ecology’s Confirmed & Suspected Contaminated Sites List. An online review and analysis by CH2M HILL, INC. of the CSCSL list, as provided by EDR, and dated 04/26/2010 has revealed that there are 3 CSCSL sites within approximately 1 mile of the target property. PageMap IDDirection / Distance Address Equal/Higher Elevation ____________________ ________ ___________________ _____ _____ PACIFIC CAR & FOUNDRY CO. 1400 NORTH 4TH STREET SW 1/2 - 1 (0.713 mi.) 0 7 LEARNING CENTER 4101 NE SUNSET BLVD ENE 1/2 - 1 (0.937 mi.) 33 106 PageMap IDDirection / Distance Address Lower Elevation ____________________ ________ ___________________ _____ _____ RENTON HIGHLANDS LANDFILL NE 3RD ST / NE 4TH ST SSE 1/2 - 1 (0.860 mi.) 32 105 State and tribal registered storage tank lists UST: The Underground Storage Tank database contains registered USTs. USTs are regulated under Subtitle I of the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA). The data come from the Department of Ecology’s Statewide UST Site/Tank Report. An online review and analysis by CH2M HILL, INC. of the UST list, as provided by EDR, and dated 05/24/2010 has revealed that there are 4 UST sites within approximately 0.25 miles of the target property. PageMap IDDirection / Distance Address Equal/Higher Elevation ____________________ ________ ___________________ _____ _____ SUNSET BLVD SHELL 2800 NE SUNSET BLVD SE 0 - 1/8 (0.077 mi.) B3 32 JC MART 2801 NE SUNSET BLVD SE 0 - 1/8 (0.077 mi.) B5 37 MCKNIGHT MIDDLE SCHOOL 2600 NE 12TH ST NNW 1/8 - 1/4 (0.196 mi.) 15 52 PageMap IDDirection / Distance Address Lower Elevation ____________________ ________ ___________________ _____ _____ RENTON MARINE 900 HARRINGTON AVE NE S 1/8 - 1/4 (0.201 mi.) D16 53 State and tribal voluntary cleanup sites VCP: Sites that have entered either the Voluntary Cleanup Program or its predecessor Independent Remedial Action Program. An online review and analysis by CH2M HILL, INC. of the VCP list, as provided by EDR, and dated 04/22/2010 has revealed that there is 1 VCP site within approximately 0.5 miles of the target property. PageMap IDDirection / Distance Address Equal/Higher Elevation ____________________ ________ ___________________ _____ _____ JC MART 2801 NE SUNSET BLVD SE 0 - 1/8 (0.077 mi.) B5 37 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY TC2826208.2s EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 7 ICR: These are remedial action reports Ecology has received from either the owner or operator of the site. These actions have been conducted without department oversight or approval and are not under an order or decree. An online review and analysis by CH2M HILL, INC. of the ICR list, as provided by EDR, and dated 12/01/2002 has revealed that there are 3 ICR sites within approximately 0.5 miles of the target property. PageMap IDDirection / Distance Address Equal/Higher Elevation ____________________ ________ ___________________ _____ _____ JC MART 2801 NE SUNSET BLVD. SE 0 - 1/8 (0.077 mi.) B6 40 CONOCOPHILLIPS 2705509 3002 SUNSET BLVD NE NE 1/8 - 1/4 (0.203 mi.) E17 56 ARCO #4400 3123 NE SUNSET BLVD. NE 1/4 - 1/2 (0.315 mi.) F26 75 ADDITIONAL ENVIRONMENTAL RECORDS Local Lists of Hazardous waste / Contaminated Sites ALLSITES: Information on facilities and sites of interest to the Department of Ecology. An online review and analysis by CH2M HILL, INC. of the ALLSITES list, as provided by EDR, and dated 05/12/2010 has revealed that there are 19 ALLSITES sites within approximately 0.5 miles of the target property. PageMap IDDirection / Distance Address Equal/Higher Elevation ____________________ ________ ___________________ _____ _____ CLEANING SHOPPE 2830 SUNSET BLVD NE ESE 0 - 1/8 (0.076 mi.) A2 29 SUNSET BLVD SHELL 2800 NE SUNSET BLVD SE 0 - 1/8 (0.077 mi.) B3 32 JC MART 2801 NE SUNSET BLVD SE 0 - 1/8 (0.077 mi.) B5 37 HIGHLANDS ONE HOUR CLEANERS IN 2808 NE 10TH SE 0 - 1/8 (0.077 mi.) B8 41 RENTON HIGHLANDER CENTER INC 2806 NE 10TH SE 0 - 1/8 (0.077 mi.) B9 45 PLAID PANTRIES INC 2801 SUNSET BLVD NE SE 0 - 1/8 (0.078 mi.) A11 49 MCKNIGHT MIDDLE SCHOOL 2600 NE 12TH ST NNW 1/8 - 1/4 (0.196 mi.) 15 52 CONOCOPHILLIPS 2705509 3002 SUNSET BLVD NE NE 1/8 - 1/4 (0.203 mi.) E17 56 RITE AID STORE 5203 3116 NE SUNSET BLVD NE 1/4 - 1/2 (0.308 mi.) F24 73 ARCO STATION 4400 3123 NW SUNSET BLVD NE 1/4 - 1/2 (0.315 mi.) F25 74 DANIELS DRYCLEANERS SUNSET BLV 3155 NE SUNSET BLVD NE 1/4 - 1/2 (0.358 mi.) G28 77 BUSY BEE CLEANERS 3164 SUNSET BLVD NE NE 1/4 - 1/2 (0.372 mi.) G29 83 NORTH HIGHLANDS COMMUNITY CENT 3000 NE 16TH ST NNE 1/4 - 1/2 (0.442 mi.) 30 87 PageMap IDDirection / Distance Address Lower Elevation ____________________ ________ ___________________ _____ _____ RENTON MARINE 900 HARRINGTON AVE NE S 1/8 - 1/4 (0.201 mi.) D16 53 COLPETTS DEVELOPMENT 936 HARRINGTON AVE NE S 1/8 - 1/4 (0.213 mi.) D20 69 FRIENDLY FUELS INC RENTON 1190 SUNSET BLVD NE STE WNW 1/4 - 1/2 (0.264 mi.) 22 70 RENTON FIRE STATION 12 901 HARRINGTON AVE NE S 1/4 - 1/2 (0.270 mi.) 23 71 MIKE POTOSHNIK JR 1105 SUNSET BLVD NE W 1/4 - 1/2 (0.351 mi.) 27 76 KENWORTH TRUCK CO RENTON 1601 N. 8TH ST. SW 1/4 - 1/2 (0.446 mi.) 31 88 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY TC2826208.2s EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 8 CSCSL NFA: The data set contains information about sites previously on the Confirmed and Suspected Contaminated Sites list that have received a No Further Action (NFA) determination. Because it is necessary to maintain historical records of sites that have been investigated and cleaned up, sites are not deleted from the database when cleanup activities are completed. Instead a No Further Action code is entered based upon the type of NFA determination the site received. An online review and analysis by CH2M HILL, INC. of the CSCSL NFA list, as provided by EDR, and dated 04/26/2010 has revealed that there are 3 CSCSL NFA sites within approximately 0.5 miles of the target property. PageMap IDDirection / Distance Address Equal/Higher Elevation ____________________ ________ ___________________ _____ _____ JC MART 2801 NE SUNSET BLVD SE 0 - 1/8 (0.077 mi.) B5 37 CONOCOPHILLIPS 2705509 3002 SUNSET BLVD NE NE 1/8 - 1/4 (0.203 mi.) E17 56 ARCO STATION 4400 3123 NW SUNSET BLVD NE 1/4 - 1/2 (0.315 mi.) F25 74 Other Ascertainable Records RCRA-NonGen: RCRAInfo is EPA’s comprehensive information system, providing access to data supporting the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) of 1976 and the Hazardous and Solid Waste Amendments (HSWA) of 1984. The database includes selective information on sites which generate, transport, store, treat and/or dispose of hazardous waste as defined by the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA). Non-Generators do not presently generate hazardous waste. An online review and analysis by CH2M HILL, INC. of the RCRA-NonGen list, as provided by EDR, and dated 02/17/2010 has revealed that there are 5 RCRA-NonGen sites within approximately 0.25 miles of the target property. PageMap IDDirection / Distance Address Equal/Higher Elevation ____________________ ________ ___________________ _____ _____ CLEANING SHOPPE 2830 SUNSET BLVD NE ESE 0 - 1/8 (0.076 mi.) A2 29 HIGHLANDS ONE HOUR CLEANERS IN 2808 NE 10TH SE 0 - 1/8 (0.077 mi.) B8 41 PLAID PANTRIES INC 2801 SUNSET BLVD NE SE 0 - 1/8 (0.078 mi.) A11 49 CONOCOPHILLIPS 2705509 3002 SUNSET BLVD NE NE 1/8 - 1/4 (0.203 mi.) E17 56 PageMap IDDirection / Distance Address Lower Elevation ____________________ ________ ___________________ _____ _____ RENTON MARINE 900 HARRINGTON AVE NE S 1/8 - 1/4 (0.201 mi.) D16 53 ROD: Record of Decision. ROD documents mandate a permanent remedy at an NPL (Superfund) site containing technical and health information to aid the cleanup. An online review and analysis by CH2M HILL, INC. of the ROD list, as provided by EDR, and dated 04/29/2010 has revealed that there is 1 ROD site within approximately 1 mile of the target property. PageMap IDDirection / Distance Address Equal/Higher Elevation ____________________ ________ ___________________ _____ _____ PACIFIC CAR & FOUNDRY CO. 1400 NORTH 4TH STREET SW 1/2 - 1 (0.713 mi.) 0 7 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY TC2826208.2s EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 9 MANIFEST: Hazardous waste manifest information. An online review and analysis by CH2M HILL, INC. of the MANIFEST list, as provided by EDR, and dated 12/31/2009 has revealed that there is 1 MANIFEST site within approximately 0.25 miles of the target property. PageMap IDDirection / Distance Address Equal/Higher Elevation ____________________ ________ ___________________ _____ _____ CONOCOPHILLIPS 2705509 3002 SUNSET BLVD NE NE 1/8 - 1/4 (0.203 mi.) E17 56 Inactive Drycleaners: A listing of inactive drycleaner facility locations. An online review and analysis by CH2M HILL, INC. of the Inactive Drycleaners list, as provided by EDR, and dated 12/31/2009 has revealed that there are 3 Inactive Drycleaners sites within approximately 0.25 miles of the target property. PageMap IDDirection / Distance Address Equal/Higher Elevation ____________________ ________ ___________________ _____ _____ CLEANING SHOPPE 2830 SUNSET BLVD NE ESE 0 - 1/8 (0.076 mi.) A2 29 HIGHLANDS ONE HOUR CLEANERS IN 2808 NE 10TH SE 0 - 1/8 (0.077 mi.) B8 41 RENTON HIGHLANDER CENTER INC 2806 NE 10TH SE 0 - 1/8 (0.077 mi.) B9 45 EDR PROPRIETARY RECORDS EDR Proprietary Records EDR Historical Auto Stations: EDR has searched selected national collections of business directories and has collected listings of potential gas station/filling station/service station sites that were available to EDR researchers. EDR’s review was limited to those categories of sources that might, in EDR’s opinion, include gas station/filling station/service station establishments. The categories reviewed included, but were not limited to gas, gas station, gasoline station, filling station, auto, automobile repair, auto service station, service station, etc. An online review and analysis by CH2M HILL, INC. of the EDR Historical Auto Stations list, as provided by EDR, has revealed that there are 5 EDR Historical Auto Stations sites within approximately 0.25 miles of the target property. PageMap IDDirection / Distance Address Equal/Higher Elevation ____________________ ________ ___________________ _____ _____ GULL SERVICE STATION 2800 NE SUNSET BLVD SE 0 - 1/8 (0.077 mi.) B4 37 HIGHLANDS TEXACO 3005 NE SUNSET BLVD NE 1/8 - 1/4 (0.203 mi.) E18 67 PageMap IDDirection / Distance Address Lower Elevation ____________________ ________ ___________________ _____ _____ HIGHLAND AUTOMOTIVE MICHL SCH 2615 NE SUNSET BLVD SW 1/8 - 1/4 (0.145 mi.) 12 51 FARRELL S SERVICE SHOP 960 HARRINGTON AVE S 1/8 - 1/4 (0.178 mi.) C13 51 FARRELL S SERVICE SHOP 950 HARRINGTON AVE S 1/8 - 1/4 (0.193 mi.) C14 52 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY TC2826208.2s EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 10 EDR Historical Cleaners: EDR has searched selected national collections of business directories and has collected listings of potential dry cleaner sites that were available to EDR researchers. EDR’s review was limited to those categories of sources that might, in EDR’s opinion, include dry cleaning establishments. The categories reviewed included, but were not limited to dry cleaners, cleaners, laundry, laundromat, cleaning/laundry, wash & dry etc. An online review and analysis by CH2M HILL, INC. of the EDR Historical Cleaners list, as provided by EDR, has revealed that there are 4 EDR Historical Cleaners sites within approximately 0.25 miles of the target property. PageMap IDDirection / Distance Address Equal/Higher Elevation ____________________ ________ ___________________ _____ _____ CLEANING SHOPPE THE SUNG KANG 2830 NE SUNSET BLVD ESE 0 - 1/8 (0.076 mi.) A1 28 RENTON HIGHLANDER CENTER DONA 2806 NE 10TH ST SE 0 - 1/8 (0.077 mi.) B7 41 HIGHLANDS ONE HOUR MARTINIZING 2808 NE 10TH ST SE 0 - 1/8 (0.077 mi.) B10 49 PageMap IDDirection / Distance Address Lower Elevation ____________________ ________ ___________________ _____ _____ SPARKLE DRY CLEANING AND LAUND 927 HARRINGTON AVE NE S 1/8 - 1/4 (0.229 mi.) 21 69 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY TC2826208.2s EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 11 Due to poor or inadequate address information, the following sites were not mapped: Site Name Database(s)____________ ____________ WA DOT HAZEL ALLSITES WA DOT I405 I5 TO SR 169 ALLSITES WA DOT BRIDGE 90020 RCRA-NonGen, FINDS, ALLSITES RENTON SERVICE CENTER CSCSL, ALLSITES SUNSET MATERIALS INC RENTON ALLSITES, NPDES WA ECY SUNSET SPILL RCRA-NonGen, ALLSITES WASTE MOBILE COLLECTIONS SWF/LF MCMICKEN HEIGHTS SWF/LF RENTON JUNCTION (MONSTER ROAD) SWF/LF CORLISS ABANDONED LANDFILL SWF/LF BOW LAKE ABANDONED LANDFILL SWF/LF PUYALLUP/KIT CORNER ABANDONED LANDFILL SWF/LF NORTH BEND SWF/LF VASHON ISLAND SWF/LF REDONDO PIT SWF/LF RENTON HIGHLANDS SWF/LF SUNSET PARK SWF/LF ENUMCLAW SWF/LF TUKWILA SWF/LF PACIFIC CITY SWF/LF AUBURN (M & R STREET SITE) SWF/LF HOUGHTON SWF/LF CARTON & BORTH SWF/LF AUBURN (ROTARY PARK SITE) SWF/LF FACTORIA PIT (SUNSET RAVINE PARK) SWF/LF PUYALLUP/KIT CORNER SWF/LF BOW LAKE SWF/LF H.H. OLESON SWF/LF KENT ABANDONED LANDFILL (MILL CREEK CANYON PARK) SWF/LF CORLISS LANDFILL SWF/LF EASTGATE ABANDONED LANDFILL SWF/LF SKYKOMISH SWF/LF HOUGHTON ABANDONED LANDFILL SWF/LF FALL CITY ABANDONED LANDFILL SWF/LF MAPLE VALLEY BP UST SUNSET MATERIALS INC RENTON FINDS WA ECY SUNSET SPILL FINDS EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc. 230 kV230 kV 2 30 kV 2 30 kV 2 30 kV 230 kV 230 kV 230 kV 2 3 0 kV 2 3 0 kV 2 3 0 kV 2 30 kV230 kV 230 kV 230 kV 2 3 0 kV 2 3 0 kV 32 03 2 0 4 404404 00 20040404080 801201201601 602 0 0 200 2002 00240240240 2402802802 8 0 280280320320 32032036 0360360 360400 40 0 400 400 4 0 0 4004003604004003603603202802 8 0 2802802402002001601604080120 EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc. 230 kV 2 30 kV280320320 360280 MAP FINDINGS SUMMARY Search Target Distance Total Database Property (Miles) < 1/8 1/8 - 1/4 1/4 - 1/2 1/2 - 1 > 1 Plotted STANDARD ENVIRONMENTAL RECORDS Federal NPL site list 1 NR 1 0 0 0 1.000NPL 0 NR 0 0 0 0 1.000Proposed NPL 0 NR NR NR NR NR TPNPL LIENS Federal Delisted NPL site list 0 NR 0 0 0 0 1.000Delisted NPL Federal CERCLIS list 0 NR NR 0 0 0 0.500CERCLIS 0 NR 0 0 0 0 1.000FEDERAL FACILITY Federal CERCLIS NFRAP site List 0 NR NR 0 0 0 0.500CERC-NFRAP Federal RCRA CORRACTS facilities list 0 NR 0 0 0 0 1.000CORRACTS Federal RCRA non-CORRACTS TSD facilities list 0 NR NR 0 0 0 0.500RCRA-TSDF Federal RCRA generators list 0 NR NR NR 0 0 0.250RCRA-LQG 1 NR NR NR 1 0 0.250RCRA-SQG 1 NR NR NR 0 1 0.250RCRA-CESQG Federal institutional controls / engineering controls registries 0 NR NR 0 0 0 0.500US ENG CONTROLS 0 NR NR 0 0 0 0.500US INST CONTROL Federal ERNS list 0 NR NR NR NR NR TPERNS State- and tribal - equivalent NPL 1 NR 1 0 0 0 1.000HSL State- and tribal - equivalent CERCLIS 3 NR 3 0 0 0 1.000CSCSL State and tribal landfill and/or solid waste disposal site lists 0 NR NR 0 0 0 0.500SWF/LF State and tribal leaking storage tank lists 0 NR NR 0 0 0 0.500LUST 0 NR NR 0 0 0 0.500INDIAN LUST TC2826208.2s Page 4 MAP FINDINGS SUMMARY Search Target Distance Total Database Property (Miles) < 1/8 1/8 - 1/4 1/4 - 1/2 1/2 - 1 > 1 Plotted State and tribal registered storage tank lists 4 NR NR NR 2 2 0.250UST 0 NR NR NR 0 0 0.250AST 0 NR NR NR 0 0 0.250INDIAN UST 0 NR NR NR 0 0 0.250FEMA UST State and tribal institutional control / engineering control registries 0 NR NR 0 0 0 0.500INST CONTROL State and tribal voluntary cleanup sites 1 NR NR 0 0 1 0.500VCP 0 NR NR 0 0 0 0.500INDIAN VCP 3 NR NR 1 1 1 0.500ICR State and tribal Brownfields sites 0 NR NR 0 0 0 0.500BROWNFIELDS ADDITIONAL ENVIRONMENTAL RECORDS Local Brownfield lists 0 NR NR 0 0 0 0.500US BROWNFIELDS Local Lists of Landfill / Solid Waste Disposal Sites 0 NR NR 0 0 0 0.500ODI 0 NR NR 0 0 0 0.500DEBRIS REGION 9 0 NR NR 0 0 0 0.500SWTIRE 0 NR NR 0 0 0 0.500INDIAN ODI Local Lists of Hazardous waste / Contaminated Sites 0 NR NR NR NR NR TPUS CDL 19 NR NR 9 4 6 0.500ALLSITES 3 NR NR 1 1 1 0.500CSCSL NFA 0 NR NR NR NR NR TPCDL 0 NR NR NR NR NR TPHIST CDL 0 NR NR NR NR NR TPUS HIST CDL Local Land Records 0 NR NR NR NR NR TPLIENS 2 0 NR NR 0 0 0 0.500LUCIS Records of Emergency Release Reports 0 NR NR NR NR NR TPHMIRS 0 NR NR NR NR NR TPSPILLS Other Ascertainable Records 5 NR NR NR 2 3 0.250RCRA-NonGen TC2826208.2s Page 5 MAP FINDINGS SUMMARY Search Target Distance Total Database Property (Miles) < 1/8 1/8 - 1/4 1/4 - 1/2 1/2 - 1 > 1 Plotted 0 NR NR NR NR NR TPDOT OPS 0 NR 0 0 0 0 1.000DOD 0 NR 0 0 0 0 1.000FUDS 0 NR 0 0 0 0 1.000CONSENT 1 NR 1 0 0 0 1.000ROD 0 NR NR 0 0 0 0.500UMTRA 0 NR NR NR 0 0 0.250MINES 0 NR NR NR NR NR TPTRIS 0 NR NR NR NR NR TPTSCA 0 NR NR NR NR NR TPFTTS 0 NR NR NR NR NR TPHIST FTTS 0 NR NR NR NR NR TPSSTS 0 NR NR NR NR NR TPICIS 0 NR NR NR NR NR TPPADS 0 NR NR NR NR NR TPMLTS 0 NR NR NR NR NR TPRADINFO 0 NR NR NR NR NR TPFINDS 0 NR NR NR NR NR TPRAATS 0 NR NR NR NR NR TPUIC 1 NR NR NR 1 0 0.250MANIFEST 0 NR NR NR 0 0 0.250DRYCLEANERS 0 NR NR NR NR NR TPNPDES 0 NR NR NR NR NR TPAIRS 3 NR NR NR 0 3 0.250Inactive Drycleaners 0 NR 0 0 0 0 1.000INDIAN RESERV 0 NR NR 0 0 0 0.500SCRD DRYCLEANERS 0 NR NR 0 0 0 0.500COAL ASH 0 NR NR NR NR NR TPPCB TRANSFORMER 0 NR NR 0 0 0 0.500COAL ASH EPA 0 NR NR NR NR NR TPCOAL ASH DOE EDR PROPRIETARY RECORDS EDR Proprietary Records 0 NR 0 0 0 0 1.000Manufactured Gas Plants 5 NR NR NR 4 1 0.250EDR Historical Auto Stations 4 NR NR NR 1 3 0.250EDR Historical Cleaners NOTES: TP = Target Property NR = Not Requested at this Search Distance Sites may be listed in more than one database TC2826208.2s Page 6 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation Not reportedCAS #: BARIUM AND COMPOUNDSSubstance: A006Substance ID: Currently on the Final NPLNPL Status: 4Scoring: GROUND WATER PATHWAYPathway: Not reportedCAS #: ARSENIC AND COMPOUNDSSubstance: A005Substance ID: Currently on the Final NPLNPL Status: Not reportedScoring: Not reportedPathway: Not reportedCAS #: Not reportedSubstance: Not reportedSubstance ID: Currently on the Final NPLNPL Status: Substance Details: 02/21/90Date Finalized: Not reportedDate Deleted: 06/24/88Date Proposed: 10EPA Region: KINGSite County: NoFederal Site: WASite State: RENTONSite City: 98055Site Zip: FinalSite Status: PACIFIC CAR & FOUNDRY CO.Site Name: Site Details: 0Category Value: Distance To Nearest Population-0 Miles (On Site)Category Description: Currently on the Final NPLNPL Status: 75 FTBGSCategory Value: Depth To Aquifer-> 50 And <= 100 FeetCategory Description: Currently on the Final NPLNPL Status: Category Details: Not reportedFinal Date: NFederal: 10EPA Region: WAD009249210EPA ID: NPL: INST CONTROL MANIFEST ALLSITES HSL CSCSL 3763 ft.FINDS 1/2-1 ROD SW RCRA-NonGenRENTON, WA 98055 Region CERCLIS1400 NORTH 4TH STREET WAD009249210 NPL NPLPACIFIC CAR & FOUNDRY CO.1000251921 TC2826208.2s Page 7 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation NO PATHWAY INDICATEDPathway: Not reportedCAS #: IRON AND COMPOUNDSSubstance: C151Substance ID: Currently on the Final NPLNPL Status: 1Scoring: NO PATHWAY INDICATEDPathway: Not reportedCAS #: SILVER AND COMPOUNDSSubstance: A049Substance ID: Currently on the Final NPLNPL Status: 1Scoring: NO PATHWAY INDICATEDPathway: 1336-36-3CAS #: POLYCHLORINATED BIPHENYLSSubstance: A046Substance ID: Currently on the Final NPLNPL Status: 1Scoring: NO PATHWAY INDICATEDPathway: Not reportedCAS #: NICKEL AND COMPOUNDSSubstance: A038Substance ID: Currently on the Final NPLNPL Status: 3Scoring: SURFACE WATER PATHWAYPathway: Not reportedCAS #: CHROMIUM AND COMPOUNDSSubstance: A020Substance ID: Currently on the Final NPLNPL Status: 4Scoring: GROUND WATER PATHWAYPathway: Not reportedCAS #: CHROMIUM AND COMPOUNDSSubstance: A020Substance ID: Currently on the Final NPLNPL Status: 1Scoring: NO PATHWAY INDICATEDPathway: Not reportedCAS #: BERYLLIUM AND COMPOUNDSSubstance: A011Substance ID: Currently on the Final NPLNPL Status: 3Scoring: SURFACE WATER PATHWAYPathway: Not reportedCAS #: BARIUM AND COMPOUNDSSubstance: A006Substance ID: Currently on the Final NPLNPL Status: 3Scoring: GROUND WATER PATHWAYPathway: PACIFIC CAR & FOUNDRY CO. (Continued) 1000251921 TC2826208.2s Page 8 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation 3Scoring: SURFACE WATER PATHWAYPathway: 7440-43-9CAS #: CADMIUM (CD)Substance: D006Substance ID: Currently on the Final NPLNPL Status: 3Scoring: GROUND WATER PATHWAYPathway: 7440-43-9CAS #: CADMIUM (CD)Substance: D006Substance ID: Currently on the Final NPLNPL Status: 3Scoring: SURFACE WATER PATHWAYPathway: 7440-38-2CAS #: ARSENICSubstance: D004Substance ID: Currently on the Final NPLNPL Status: 1Scoring: NO PATHWAY INDICATEDPathway: 7439-97-6CAS #: MERCURYSubstance: C460Substance ID: Currently on the Final NPLNPL Status: 1Scoring: NO PATHWAY INDICATEDPathway: Not reportedCAS #: ZINC AND COMPOUNDSSubstance: C247Substance ID: Currently on the Final NPLNPL Status: 1Scoring: NO PATHWAY INDICATEDPathway: Not reportedCAS #: PHENOLS AND PHENOLIC COMPOUNDSSubstance: C212Substance ID: Currently on the Final NPLNPL Status: 1Scoring: NO PATHWAY INDICATEDPathway: Not reportedCAS #: COPPER AND COMPOUNDSSubstance: C178Substance ID: Currently on the Final NPLNPL Status: 1Scoring: NO PATHWAY INDICATEDPathway: Not reportedCAS #: ALUMINUM AND COMPOUNDSSubstance: C156Substance ID: Currently on the Final NPLNPL Status: 1Scoring: PACIFIC CAR & FOUNDRY CO. (Continued) 1000251921 TC2826208.2s Page 9 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation under a Consent Decree with the Washington Department of Ecology, PACCAR recreational activities. Status February 21, 1990): In August 1988, Washington, which is within 3 miles downstream of the site and is used for into the Cedar River and John s Creek. The Cedar River flows into Lake the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act. A ditch on the site drains transported it to a ha ardous waste facility regulated under Subtitle C of removed some contaminated soil containing hydrocarbons and lead and municipal wells within 3 miles of the site. In November 1987, PACCAR, Inc., contaminated aquifer. An estimated 37,200 people obtain drinking water from ground water. Renton has wells in an aquifer connected to the shallow lead, mercury, arsenic, cadmium, and chromium in on-site soil and in shallow cover the abandoned landfill. In February1986, PACCAR, Inc., detected been buried up to 7 feet below the surface. Sand and gravel have been used to a marshy area underlain by peat and clay. The wastes are estimated to have materials, including foundry sand, wood, metal, paints, solvents, and oils, in northwest quarter of the property. Until 1964, the facility deposited waste a division of PACCAR, Inc. An inactive company landfill occupies the facility operated during1907-24 and from 1934 to the present. The company is 97 acres in an industrial area of Renton, King County, Washington. The manufactures trucks, winches, military equipment, railroad cars, and anodes on Conditions at proposal June 24, 1988): Pacific Car Foundry Co. Summary Details: 1Scoring: NO PATHWAY INDICATEDPathway: 130498-29-2CAS #: POLYNUCLEAR AROMATIC HYDROCARBONSSubstance: W031Substance ID: Currently on the Final NPLNPL Status: 1Scoring: NO PATHWAY INDICATEDPathway: Not reportedCAS #: PESTICIDESSubstance: W012Substance ID: Currently on the Final NPLNPL Status: 1Scoring: NO PATHWAY INDICATEDPathway: Not reportedCAS #: VOLATILE ORGANICSSubstance: W002Substance ID: Currently on the Final NPLNPL Status: 3Scoring: SURFACE WATER PATHWAYPathway: 7439-92-1CAS #: LEAD (PB)Substance: D008Substance ID: Currently on the Final NPLNPL Status: 4Scoring: GROUND WATER PATHWAYPathway: 7439-92-1CAS #: LEAD (PB)Substance: D008Substance ID: Currently on the Final NPLNPL Status: PACIFIC CAR & FOUNDRY CO. (Continued) 1000251921 TC2826208.2s Page 10 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation Not reportedPriority Level: 04/02/87Date Completed: Not reportedDate Started: HAZARD RANKING SYSTEM PACKAGEAction: Higher priority for further assessmentPriority Level: 09/17/86Date Completed: 08/27/86Date Started: SITE INSPECTIONAction: Higher priority for further assessmentPriority Level: 04/24/85Date Completed: 12/05/84Date Started: PRELIMINARY ASSESSMENTAction: Not reportedPriority Level: 06/05/81Date Completed: Not reportedDate Started: DISCOVERYAction: CERCLIS Assessment History: Not reportedSite Description: RENTON, WA 98055 1400 N 4TH STAlias Address: PACIFIC CAR & FOUNDRY CO.Alias Name: Not reported Not reportedAlias Address: PACIFIC CAR & FOUNDRY COAlias Name: KING, WA Not reportedAlias Address: PACIFIC CAR & FOUNDRY COAlias Name: WA Not reportedAlias Address: PACCARAlias Name: CERCLIS Site Alias Name(s): Not reportedNon NPL Status: Currently on the Final NPLNPL Status: Not a Federal FacilityFederal Facility: 1000614Site ID: CERCLIS: WAState: RENTONCity: PACIFIC CAR & FOUNDRY CO.NPL Name: Narratives Details: Not reportedDeleted Date: 02/21/1990Final Date: 06/24/1988Proposed Date: FinalNPL Status: Site Status Details: action. The work is scheduled to be completed in early 1990. extent of contamination at the site and identify alternatives for remedial began a remedial investigation/feasibility study to determine the type and PACIFIC CAR & FOUNDRY CO. (Continued) 1000251921 TC2826208.2s Page 11 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation 11/08/91Date Started: REMEDIAL DESIGNAction: Not reportedPriority Level: 08/05/96Date Completed: 11/08/91Date Started: REMEDIAL ACTIONAction: Not reportedPriority Level: 12/02/92Date Completed: 12/02/92Date Started: REMOVAL ASSESSMENTAction: Not reportedPriority Level: 11/08/91Date Completed: Not reportedDate Started: STATE CONSENT DECREEAction: Not reportedPriority Level: 11/08/91Date Completed: 05/01/91Date Started: REMEDIAL DESIGN/REMEDIAL ACTION NEGOTIATIONSAction: Final Remedy Selected at SitePriority Level: 09/06/91Date Completed: Not reportedDate Started: RECORD OF DECISIONAction: Not reportedPriority Level: 09/06/91Date Completed: 08/19/88Date Started: COMBINED REMEDIAL INVESTIGATION/FEASIBILITY STUDYAction: Not reportedPriority Level: 09/11/90Date Completed: Not reportedDate Started: REMOVAL ASSESSMENTAction: Not reportedPriority Level: 02/21/90Date Completed: Not reportedDate Started: FINAL LISTING ON NATIONAL PRIORITIES LISTAction: Not reportedPriority Level: 11/07/88Date Completed: Not reportedDate Started: STATE CONSENT DECREEAction: Not reportedPriority Level: 11/07/88Date Completed: Not reportedDate Started: REMEDIAL INVESTIGATION/FEASIBILITY STUDY NEGOTIATIONSAction: Not reportedPriority Level: 06/24/88Date Completed: Not reportedDate Started: PROPOSAL TO NATIONAL PRIORITIES LISTAction: PACIFIC CAR & FOUNDRY CO. (Continued) 1000251921 TC2826208.2s Page 12 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation Commercial status unknownOff-site waste receiver: NoUsed oil transporter: NoUsed oil transfer facility: NoUsed oil Specification marketer: NoUsed oil fuel marketer to burner: NoUser oil refiner: NoUsed oil processor: NoUsed oil fuel burner: NoFurnace exemption: NoOn-site burner exemption: NoUnderground injection activity: NoTreater, storer or disposer of HW: NoTransporter of hazardous waste: NoRecycler of hazardous waste: NoMixed waste (haz. and radioactive): NoU.S. importer of hazardous waste: Handler Activities Summary: Not reportedOwner/Op end date: 12/31/2007Owner/Op start date: OperatorOwner/Operator Type: PrivateLegal status: Not reportedOwner/operator telephone: USOwner/operator country: BELLEVUE, WA 98009 PO BOX 1518Owner/operator address: PACCAR INCOwner/operator name: Owner/Operator Summary: Handler: Non-Generators do not presently generate hazardous wasteDescription: Non-GeneratorClassification: PrivateLand type: 10EPA Region: Not reportedContact email: (425)468-7055Contact telephone: USContact country: BELLEVUE, WA 98009-1518 PO BOX 1518Contact address: VICKI ZUMBRUNNENContact: BELLEVUE, WA 98009-1518 PO BOX 1518Mailing address: WAD009249210EPA ID: RENTON, WA 980551535 1400 N 4TH STFacility address: PACCAR INCFacility name: 02/22/2008Date form received by agency: RCRA-NonGen: Not reportedPriority Level: 08/05/96Date Completed: Not reportedDate Started: PRELIMINARY CLOSE-OUT REPORT PREPAREDAction: Not reportedPriority Level: 08/05/96Date Completed: PACIFIC CAR & FOUNDRY CO. (Continued) 1000251921 TC2826208.2s Page 13 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation NCDB (National Compliance Data Base) supports implementation of the Quality Programs. Quality, Dam Safety, Hazardous Waste, Toxics Cleanup, and Water facility/site that is currently, or has been, of interest to the Air Department of Ecology. This system contains key information for each means to query and display data maintained by the Washington Washington Facility / Site Identification System (WA-FSIS) provides a Environmental Interest/Information System 110002150038Registry ID: FINDS: Full-text of USEPA Record of Decision(s) is available from EDR. ROD: StateEvaluation lead agency: 08/28/1984Date achieved compliance: Generators - GeneralArea of violation: COMPLIANCE EVALUATION INSPECTION ON-SITEEvaluation: 04/17/1984Evaluation date: Evaluation Action Summary: Not reported Paid penalty amount: Not reported Final penalty amount: Not reported Proposed penalty amount: State Enforcement lead agency: Not reported Enf. disp. status date: Not reported Enf. disposition status: 07/08/1984 Enforcement action date: WRITTEN INFORMAL Enforcement action: StateViolation lead agency: 08/28/1984Date achieved compliance: 04/17/1984Date violation determined: Generators - GeneralArea of violation: Not reportedRegulation violated: Facility Has Received Notices of Violations: Large Quantity GeneratorClassification: PACIFIC CAR AND FOUNDRYSite name: PACCAR INCFacility name: 12/31/1990Date form received by agency: Not a generator, verifiedClassification: PACCAR INCFacility name: 12/31/2003Date form received by agency: Not a generator, verifiedClassification: PACCAR INCFacility name: 12/31/2005Date form received by agency: Not a generator, verifiedClassification: PACCAR INCFacility name: 12/31/2007Date form received by agency: Historical Generators: PACIFIC CAR & FOUNDRY CO. (Continued) 1000251921 TC2826208.2s Page 14 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation Not reportedUXO Code: Not reportedMTBE Code: Not reportedArsenic Code: NORTHWESTResponsible Unit: Not reportedAsbestos: Not reportedRadioactive Wastes: Not reportedCorrosive Wastes: Not reportedReactive Wastes: Not reportedPhenolic Compounds: Not reportedPetroleum Products: Not reportedPesticides: ConfirmedAffected Media Status: GroundwaterAffected Media: 1/1/0001Media Status Desc: 47 29 18.845 / -122 11 55.925Lat/Long (dms): 47.488568 / -122.198868Lat/Long: -122.198868Longitude: 47.488568Latitude: Not reportedAcres Remediated: Not reportedCleanup Standard: Not reportedDrinking Water Type: Not reportedClean Method: Not reportedPSI Status: 0Rank Status: 0Brownfield Status: 7/9/2008Updated Date: 3/1/1988Entered Date: 5Ecology Status Code: NorthwestRegion: Program PlanFacility Type: 2065Facility ID: CSCSL: and financial information. including an inventory of sites, planned and actual site activities, system contains information on all aspects of hazardous waste sites, to support management in all phases of the Superfund program. The Liability Information System) is the Superfund database that is used CERCLIS (Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and corrective action activities required under RCRA. program staff to track the notification, permit, compliance, and and treat, store, or dispose of hazardous waste. RCRAInfo allows RCRA events and activities related to facilities that generate, transport, Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) program through the tracking of RCRAInfo is a national information system that supports the Resource transported off-site. these facilities release directly to air, water, land, or that are from facilities on the amounts of over 300 listed toxic chemicals that US EPA TRIS (Toxics Release Inventory System) contains information and settlements. regions and states with cooperative agreements, enforcement actions, Toxic Substances Control Act (TSCA). The system tracks inspections in Federal Insecticide, Fungicide, and Rodenticide Act (FIFRA) and the PACIFIC CAR & FOUNDRY CO. (Continued) 1000251921 TC2826208.2s Page 15 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation ConfirmedConventional Contaminants, Inorganic: Not reportedConventional Contaminants, Organic: ConfirmedPolynuclear Aromatic Hydrocarbons (PAH): ConfirmedPolychlorinated biPhenyls (PCBs): ConfirmedMetals - Other non-priority pollutant medals: ConfirmedEPA Priority Pollutants - Metals and Cyanide: ConfirmedHalogenated Organic Compounds: Not reportedBase/Neutral/Acid Organics: ConfirmedNon-Halogenated Solvents: Not reportedDioxin: Not reportedUXO Code: Not reportedMTBE Code: Not reportedArsenic Code: NORTHWESTResponsible Unit: Not reportedAsbestos: Not reportedRadioactive Wastes: Not reportedCorrosive Wastes: Not reportedReactive Wastes: ConfirmedPhenolic Compounds: ConfirmedPetroleum Products: Not reportedPesticides: ConfirmedAffected Media Status: SoilAffected Media: 1/1/0001Media Status Desc: 47 29 18.845 / -122 11 55.925Lat/Long (dms): 47.488568 / -122.198868Lat/Long: -122.198868Longitude: 47.488568Latitude: Not reportedAcres Remediated: Not reportedCleanup Standard: Not reportedDrinking Water Type: Solidification/StabilizationClean Method: Not reportedPSI Status: 0Rank Status: 0Brownfield Status: 7/9/2008Updated Date: 3/1/1988Entered Date: 5Ecology Status Code: NorthwestRegion: Program PlanFacility Type: 2065Facility ID: Construction Completed, O & M UnderwayEcology Site Status (MTCA cleanup process): Not reportedOther Deleterious Substance Group: Not reportedWood Debris Contaminant Group: Not reportedBioassay/Benthic Failures Contaminant Group: Not reportedTibutyl Tin Contaminant Group: Not reportedConventional Contaminants, Inorganic: Not reportedConventional Contaminants, Organic: Not reportedPolynuclear Aromatic Hydrocarbons (PAH): Not reportedPolychlorinated biPhenyls (PCBs): Not reportedMetals - Other non-priority pollutant medals: ConfirmedEPA Priority Pollutants - Metals and Cyanide: ConfirmedHalogenated Organic Compounds: Not reportedBase/Neutral/Acid Organics: Not reportedNon-Halogenated Solvents: Not reportedDioxin: PACIFIC CAR & FOUNDRY CO. (Continued) 1000251921 TC2826208.2s Page 16 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation TRIInteraction (Aka Env Int) Type Code: 2065Geographic Location Identifier (Alias Facid): Not reportedInteraction End Date: 12/31/2009Interaction Start Date: WAD009249210Federal Program Indentifier: AInteraction Status: Hazardous Waste GeneratorInteraction (Aka Env Int) Description: HWGInteraction (Aka Env Int) Type Code: 2065Geographic Location Identifier (Alias Facid): Not reportedInteraction End Date: 9/15/1995Interaction Start Date: WAR002460Federal Program Indentifier: AInteraction Status: Construction SW GPInteraction (Aka Env Int) Description: CONSTGPInteraction (Aka Env Int) Type Code: 2065Geographic Location Identifier (Alias Facid): Not reportedInteraction End Date: 1/1/1900Interaction Start Date: WAD009249210Federal Program Indentifier: AInteraction Status: Federal (Superfund) Cleanup StInteraction (Aka Env Int) Description: FCSInteraction (Aka Env Int) Type Code: 2065Geographic Location Identifier (Alias Facid): Not reportedLocation Verified Code: 8Coordinate Point Geographic Position Code: 99Horizontal Accuracy Code: 99Coordinate Point Areal Extent Code: -122.198868Longitude Decimal Degrees: 47.488568000000001Latitude Decimal Degrees: PACIFIC CAR & FOUNDRY COFacility Name: 2065Geographic location identifier (alias facid): -122.198868Longitude: 47.488568000000001Latitude: 2065Facility Id: ALLSITES: NWRegion: 0Rank: 2065FSID Number: Construction Completed, O&M underwayFacility Status: Hazardous Sites ListFacility Type: Not reportededr_zip: KINGedr_fcnty: Not reportededr_fzip: WAedr_fstat: HSL: Construction Completed, O & M UnderwayEcology Site Status (MTCA cleanup process): Not reportedOther Deleterious Substance Group: Not reportedWood Debris Contaminant Group: Not reportedBioassay/Benthic Failures Contaminant Group: Not reportedTibutyl Tin Contaminant Group: PACIFIC CAR & FOUNDRY CO. (Continued) 1000251921 TC2826208.2s Page 17 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation 2065Facility Site ID Number: WA MANIFEST: 7/1/1988Interaction End Date: 6/30/1988Interaction Start Date: WAD009249210Federal Program Indentifier: IInteraction Status: Toxics Release InventoryInteraction (Aka Env Int) Description: TRIInteraction (Aka Env Int) Type Code: 2065Geographic Location Identifier (Alias Facid): 5/3/2000Interaction End Date: 1/29/1992Interaction Start Date: 6609Federal Program Indentifier: IInteraction Status: Underground Storage TankInteraction (Aka Env Int) Description: USTInteraction (Aka Env Int) Type Code: 2065Geographic Location Identifier (Alias Facid): 12/31/2009Interaction End Date: 12/31/2003Interaction Start Date: WAD009249210Federal Program Indentifier: IInteraction Status: Haz Waste Management ActivityInteraction (Aka Env Int) Description: HWOTHERInteraction (Aka Env Int) Type Code: 2065Geographic Location Identifier (Alias Facid): 5/3/2000Interaction End Date: 2/29/2000Interaction Start Date: Not reportedFederal Program Indentifier: IInteraction Status: Underground Storage TankInteraction (Aka Env Int) Description: USTInteraction (Aka Env Int) Type Code: 2065Geographic Location Identifier (Alias Facid): Not reportedInteraction End Date: 1/1/1989Interaction Start Date: WAD009249210Federal Program Indentifier: AInteraction Status: Emergency/Haz Chem Rpt TIER2Interaction (Aka Env Int) Description: TIER2Interaction (Aka Env Int) Type Code: 2065Geographic Location Identifier (Alias Facid): 2/2/2004Interaction End Date: 8/11/1980Interaction Start Date: WAD009249210Federal Program Indentifier: IInteraction Status: Hazardous Waste GeneratorInteraction (Aka Env Int) Description: HWGInteraction (Aka Env Int) Type Code: 2065Geographic Location Identifier (Alias Facid): 10/3/2002Interaction End Date: 1/1/1988Interaction Start Date: WAD009249210Federal Program Indentifier: IInteraction Status: Toxics Release InventoryInteraction (Aka Env Int) Description: PACIFIC CAR & FOUNDRY CO. (Continued) 1000251921 TC2826208.2s Page 18 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation Vicki ZumBrunnenLAND PERSON NAME: PrivateLAND ORG TYPE: PACCAR IncLAND ORG NAME: 2/6/1996LEGAL EFFECTIVE DATE: (425)468-7055LEGAL PHONE NBR: UNITED STATESLEGAL COUNTRY: BELLEVUE, WA 98009-1518LEGAL CITY,ST,ZIP: PO Box 1518LEGAL ADDR LINE1: PrivateLEGAL ORG TYPE: Paccar IncLEGAL ORG NAME: UNITED STATESMAIL COUNTRY: BELLEVUE, WA 98009-1518MAIL CITY,ST,ZIP: PO Box 1518MAIL ADDR LINE1: PACCAR IncMAIL NAME: Truck manufacturingBUSINESS TYPE: 331513NAICS CD: 177000505TAX REG NBR: Not reportedFacility Address 2: WAD009249210EPA ID: FalseOff-specification used oil burner - industrial furnace: FalseOff-specification used oil burner - industrial boiler: FalseOff-specification used oil burner - utility boiler: FalseDestination Facility for Universal Waste: FalseUniversal waste - lamps - accumulate: FalseUniversal waste - mercury - accumulate: FalseUniversal waste - thermostats - accumulate: FalseUniversal waste - batteries - accumulate: FalseUniversal waste - lamps - generate: FalseUniversal waste - mercury - generate: FalseUniversal waste - thermostats - generate: FalseUniversal waste - batteries - generate: FalseSmelter defferal: FalseIndustrial Furnace: FalseIndustry boiler burner: FalseUtility boiler burner: False"Other marketers (i.e., blender, distributor, etc.)": FalseGenerator marketing to burner: FalseGenerator of dangerous fuel waste: FalseTreatment/Storage/Disposal/Recycling Facility: FalseImmediate recycler: FalseImporter of hazardous waste: FalseMixed radioactive waste: FalseTreatment by Generator: FalsePermit by Rule: Not reportedData Year: generated during repairs or new construction. during repairs or new construction.d additional Dangerous Waste be number is kept open shouldadditional Dangerous Waste be generated up to 1997 from site remediation was reported under this number. The Hazardous (Dangerous) Waste generated after the plant shutdown in 1988 Renton covers PACCAR’s former Pacific Car & Foundry operation. under this number. The number is kept open shoulThe site address in plant shutdown in 1988 up to 1997 from site remediation was reported Foundry operation. Hazardous (Dangerous) Waste generated after the The site address in Renton cover PACCAR’s former Pacific Car andForm Comm: Not reportedFWC Desc: Not reportedSWC Desc: PACIFIC CAR & FOUNDRY CO. (Continued) 1000251921 TC2826208.2s Page 19 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation NoTreatment by Generator: NoPermit by Rule: Not reportedData Year: generated during repairs or new construction. during repairs or new construction.d additional Dangerous Waste be number is kept open shouldadditional Dangerous Waste be generated up to 1997 from site remediation was reported under this number. The Hazardous (Dangerous) Waste generated after the plant shutdown in 1988 Renton covers PACCAR’s former Pacific Car & Foundry operation. under this number. The number is kept open shoulThe site address in plant shutdown in 1988 up to 1997 from site remediation was reported Foundry operation. Hazardous (Dangerous) Waste generated after the The site address in Renton cover PACCAR’s former Pacific Car andForm Comm: Not reportedFWC Desc: Not reportedSWC Desc: 2065Facility Site ID Number: FalseUSED OIL FUEL MRKTR MEETS SPECS: FalseUSED OIL FUEL MRKTR DIRECTS SHPMNTS: FalseUSED OIL REREFINER: FalseUSED OIL PROCESSOR: FalseUSED OIL TRANSFER FACLTY: FalseUSED OIL TRANSPORTER: FalseUW BATTERY GEN: Not reportedOTHER EXEMPTION: FalseTRANSFER FACILITY: FalseRECYCLER ONSITE: FalseTRANSPORTS OTHRS WASTE: FalseTRANSPORTS OWN WASTE: FalseONE TIME GENERATION: FalseBATCH GENERATION: FalseMONTHLY GENERATION: XQGGEN STATUS CD: vicki.zumbrunnen@paccar.comFORM CONTACT EMAIL: (425) 468-7055FORM CONTACT PHONE NBR: UNITED STATESFORM CONTACT COUNTRY: BELLEVUE, WA 98009-1518FORM CONTACT CITY,ST,ZIP: PO BOX 1518FORM CONTACT ADDR LINE1: Vicki ZumBrunnenFORM CONTACT NAME: vicki.zumbrunnen@paccar.comSITE CONTACT EMAIL: (425) 468-7055SITE CONTACT PHONE NBR: UNITED STATESSITE CONTACT COUNTRY: BELLEVUE, WA 98009-1518SITE CONTACT ZIP: PO BOX 1518SITE CONTACT ADDR LINE1: Vicki ZumBrunnenSITE CONTACT NAME: Not reportedOPERATOR EFFECTIVE DATE: (425) 468-7400OPERATOR PHONE NBR: UNITED STATESOPERATOR COUNTRY: BELLEVUE, WA 98009OPERATOR CITY,ST,ZIP: PO Box 1518OPERATOR ADDR LINE1: PrivateOPERATOR ORG TYPE: PACCAR IncOPERATOR ORG NAME: (425)468-7055LAND PHONE NBR: UNITED STATESLAND COUNTRY: BELLEVUE, WA 98009-1518LAND CITY,ST,ZIP: 777 106th Ave NELAND ADDR LINE2: PO Box 1518LAND ADDR LINE1: PACIFIC CAR & FOUNDRY CO. (Continued) 1000251921 TC2826208.2s Page 20 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation BELLEVUE, WA 98009-1518SITE CONTACT ZIP: PO BOX 1518SITE CONTACT ADDR LINE1: Vicki ZumBrunnenSITE CONTACT NAME: Not reportedOPERATOR EFFECTIVE DATE: (425) 468-7400OPERATOR PHONE NBR: UNITED STATESOPERATOR COUNTRY: BELLEVUE, WA 98009OPERATOR CITY,ST,ZIP: PO Box 1518OPERATOR ADDR LINE1: PrivateOPERATOR ORG TYPE: PACCAR IncOPERATOR ORG NAME: (425)468-7055LAND PHONE NBR: UNITED STATESLAND COUNTRY: BELLEVUE, WA 98009-1518LAND CITY,ST,ZIP: 777 106th Ave NELAND ADDR LINE2: PO Box 1518LAND ADDR LINE1: Vicki ZumBrunnenLAND PERSON NAME: PrivateLAND ORG TYPE: PACCAR IncLAND ORG NAME: 2/6/1996LEGAL EFFECTIVE DATE: (425)468-7055LEGAL PHONE NBR: UNITED STATESLEGAL COUNTRY: BELLEVUE, WA 98009-1518LEGAL CITY,ST,ZIP: PO Box 1518LEGAL ADDR LINE1: PrivateLEGAL ORG TYPE: Paccar IncLEGAL ORG NAME: UNITED STATESMAIL COUNTRY: BELLEVUE, WA 98009-1518MAIL CITY,ST,ZIP: PO Box 1518MAIL ADDR LINE1: PACCAR IncMAIL NAME: Truck manufacturingBUSINESS TYPE: 331513NAICS CD: 177000505TAX REG NBR: Not reportedFacility Address 2: WAD009249210EPA ID: NoOff-specification used oil burner - industrial furnace: NoOff-specification used oil burner - industrial boiler: NoOff-specification used oil burner - utility boiler: NoDestination Facility for Universal Waste: NoUniversal waste - lamps - accumulate: NoUniversal waste - mercury - accumulate: NoUniversal waste - thermostats - accumulate: NoUniversal waste - batteries - accumulate: NoUniversal waste - lamps - generate: NoUniversal waste - mercury - generate: NoUniversal waste - thermostats - generate: NoUniversal waste - batteries - generate: NoSmelter defferal: NoIndustrial Furnace: NoIndustry boiler burner: NoUtility boiler burner: No"Other marketers (i.e., blender, distributor, etc.)": NoGenerator marketing to burner: NoGenerator of dangerous fuel waste: NoTreatment/Storage/Disposal/Recycling Facility: NoImmediate recycler: NoImporter of hazardous waste: NoMixed radioactive waste: PACIFIC CAR & FOUNDRY CO. (Continued) 1000251921 TC2826208.2s Page 21 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation FalseDestination Facility for Universal Waste: FalseUniversal waste - lamps - accumulate: FalseUniversal waste - mercury - accumulate: FalseUniversal waste - thermostats - accumulate: FalseUniversal waste - batteries - accumulate: FalseUniversal waste - lamps - generate: FalseUniversal waste - mercury - generate: FalseUniversal waste - thermostats - generate: FalseUniversal waste - batteries - generate: FalseSmelter defferal: FalseIndustrial Furnace: FalseIndustry boiler burner: FalseUtility boiler burner: False"Other marketers (i.e., blender, distributor, etc.)": FalseGenerator marketing to burner: FalseGenerator of dangerous fuel waste: FalseTreatment/Storage/Disposal/Recycling Facility: FalseImmediate recycler: FalseImporter of hazardous waste: FalseMixed radioactive waste: FalseTreatment by Generator: FalsePermit by Rule: 2009Data Year: be generated during repairs or new construction. this number. The number is kept open should additional Dangerous Waste shutdown in 1988 up to 1997 from site remediation was reported under operation. Hazardous (Dangerous) Waste generated after the plant The site address in Renton covers the former Pacific Car & FoundryForm Comm: D008 - LeadFWC Desc: Not reportedSWC Desc: 2065Facility Site ID Number: NoUSED OIL FUEL MRKTR MEETS SPECS: NoUSED OIL FUEL MRKTR DIRECTS SHPMNTS: NoUSED OIL REREFINER: NoUSED OIL PROCESSOR: NoUSED OIL TRANSFER FACLTY: NoUSED OIL TRANSPORTER: NoUW BATTERY GEN: Not reportedOTHER EXEMPTION: NoTRANSFER FACILITY: NoRECYCLER ONSITE: NoTRANSPORTS OTHRS WASTE: NoTRANSPORTS OWN WASTE: NoONE TIME GENERATION: NoBATCH GENERATION: NoMONTHLY GENERATION: XQGGEN STATUS CD: vicki.zumbrunnen@paccar.comFORM CONTACT EMAIL: (425) 468-7055FORM CONTACT PHONE NBR: UNITED STATESFORM CONTACT COUNTRY: BELLEVUE, WA 98009-1518FORM CONTACT CITY,ST,ZIP: PO BOX 1518FORM CONTACT ADDR LINE1: Vicki ZumBrunnenFORM CONTACT NAME: vicki.zumbrunnen@paccar.comSITE CONTACT EMAIL: (425) 468-7055SITE CONTACT PHONE NBR: UNITED STATESSITE CONTACT COUNTRY: PACIFIC CAR & FOUNDRY CO. (Continued) 1000251921 TC2826208.2s Page 22 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation FalseUSED OIL TRANSPORTER: FalseUW BATTERY GEN: Not reportedOTHER EXEMPTION: FalseTRANSFER FACILITY: FalseRECYCLER ONSITE: FalseTRANSPORTS OTHRS WASTE: FalseTRANSPORTS OWN WASTE: TrueONE TIME GENERATION: FalseBATCH GENERATION: FalseMONTHLY GENERATION: MQGGEN STATUS CD: vicki.zumbrunnen@paccar.comFORM CONTACT EMAIL: (425) 468-7055FORM CONTACT PHONE NBR: UNITED STATESFORM CONTACT COUNTRY: BELLEVUE, WA 98009-1518FORM CONTACT CITY,ST,ZIP: PO BOX 1518FORM CONTACT ADDR LINE1: Vicki ZumBrunnenFORM CONTACT NAME: vicki.zumbrunnen@paccar.comSITE CONTACT EMAIL: (425) 468-7055SITE CONTACT PHONE NBR: UNITED STATESSITE CONTACT COUNTRY: BELLEVUE, WA 98009-1518SITE CONTACT ZIP: PO BOX 1518SITE CONTACT ADDR LINE1: Vicki ZumBrunnenSITE CONTACT NAME: Not reportedOPERATOR EFFECTIVE DATE: (425) 468-7400OPERATOR PHONE NBR: UNITED STATESOPERATOR COUNTRY: BELLEVUE, WA 98009OPERATOR CITY,ST,ZIP: PO Box 1518OPERATOR ADDR LINE1: PrivateOPERATOR ORG TYPE: PACCAR IncOPERATOR ORG NAME: (425)468-7055LAND PHONE NBR: UNITED STATESLAND COUNTRY: BELLEVUE, WA 98009-1518LAND CITY,ST,ZIP: 777 106th Ave NELAND ADDR LINE2: PO Box 1518LAND ADDR LINE1: Vicki ZumBrunnenLAND PERSON NAME: PrivateLAND ORG TYPE: PACCAR IncLAND ORG NAME: 2/6/1996LEGAL EFFECTIVE DATE: (425)468-7055LEGAL PHONE NBR: UNITED STATESLEGAL COUNTRY: BELLEVUE, WA 98009-1518LEGAL CITY,ST,ZIP: PO Box 1518LEGAL ADDR LINE1: PrivateLEGAL ORG TYPE: Paccar IncLEGAL ORG NAME: UNITED STATESMAIL COUNTRY: BELLEVUE, WA 98009-1518MAIL CITY,ST,ZIP: PO Box 1518MAIL ADDR LINE1: PACCAR IncMAIL NAME: Truck manufacturingBUSINESS TYPE: 331513NAICS CD: 177000505TAX REG NBR: Not reportedFacility Address 2: WAD009249210EPA ID: FalseOff-specification used oil burner - industrial furnace: FalseOff-specification used oil burner - industrial boiler: FalseOff-specification used oil burner - utility boiler: PACIFIC CAR & FOUNDRY CO. (Continued) 1000251921 TC2826208.2s Page 23 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation PACCAR IncLAND ORG NAME: 2/6/1996LEGAL EFFECTIVE DATE: (425)468-7055LEGAL PHONE NBR: UNITED STATESLEGAL COUNTRY: BELLEVUE, WA 98009-1518LEGAL CITY,ST,ZIP: PO Box 1518LEGAL ADDR LINE1: PrivateLEGAL ORG TYPE: Paccar IncLEGAL ORG NAME: UNITED STATESMAIL COUNTRY: BELLEVUE, WA 98009-1518MAIL CITY,ST,ZIP: PO Box 1518MAIL ADDR LINE1: PACCAR IncMAIL NAME: Truck manufacturingBUSINESS TYPE: 331513NAICS CD: 177000505TAX REG NBR: Not reportedFacility Address 2: WAD009249210EPA ID: FalseOff-specification used oil burner - industrial furnace: FalseOff-specification used oil burner - industrial boiler: FalseOff-specification used oil burner - utility boiler: FalseDestination Facility for Universal Waste: FalseUniversal waste - lamps - accumulate: FalseUniversal waste - mercury - accumulate: FalseUniversal waste - thermostats - accumulate: FalseUniversal waste - batteries - accumulate: FalseUniversal waste - lamps - generate: FalseUniversal waste - mercury - generate: FalseUniversal waste - thermostats - generate: FalseUniversal waste - batteries - generate: FalseSmelter defferal: FalseIndustrial Furnace: FalseIndustry boiler burner: FalseUtility boiler burner: False"Other marketers (i.e., blender, distributor, etc.)": FalseGenerator marketing to burner: FalseGenerator of dangerous fuel waste: FalseTreatment/Storage/Disposal/Recycling Facility: FalseImmediate recycler: FalseImporter of hazardous waste: FalseMixed radioactive waste: FalseTreatment by Generator: FalsePermit by Rule: 2008Data Year: Waste be generated during repairs or new construction. under this number. The number is kept open should additional Dangerous plant shutdown in 1988 up to 1997 from site remediation was reported Foundry operation. Hazardous (Dangerous) Waste generated after the The site address in Renton cover PACCAR’s former Pacific Car andForm Comm: Not reportedFWC Desc: Not reportedSWC Desc: 2065Facility Site ID Number: FalseUSED OIL FUEL MRKTR MEETS SPECS: FalseUSED OIL FUEL MRKTR DIRECTS SHPMNTS: FalseUSED OIL REREFINER: FalseUSED OIL PROCESSOR: FalseUSED OIL TRANSFER FACLTY: PACIFIC CAR & FOUNDRY CO. (Continued) 1000251921 TC2826208.2s Page 24 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation Not reportedData Year: generated during repairs or new construction. during repairs or new construction.d additional Dangerous Waste be number is kept open shouldadditional Dangerous Waste be generated up to 1997 from site remediation was reported under this number. The Hazardous (Dangerous) Waste generated after the plant shutdown in 1988 Renton covers PACCAR’s former Pacific Car & Foundry operation. under this number. The number is kept open shoulThe site address in plant shutdown in 1988 up to 1997 from site remediation was reported Foundry operation. Hazardous (Dangerous) Waste generated after the The site address in Renton cover PACCAR’s former Pacific Car andForm Comm: Not reportedFWC Desc: Not reportedSWC Desc: 2065Facility Site ID Number: FalseUSED OIL FUEL MRKTR MEETS SPECS: FalseUSED OIL FUEL MRKTR DIRECTS SHPMNTS: FalseUSED OIL REREFINER: FalseUSED OIL PROCESSOR: FalseUSED OIL TRANSFER FACLTY: FalseUSED OIL TRANSPORTER: FalseUW BATTERY GEN: Not reportedOTHER EXEMPTION: FalseTRANSFER FACILITY: FalseRECYCLER ONSITE: FalseTRANSPORTS OTHRS WASTE: FalseTRANSPORTS OWN WASTE: FalseONE TIME GENERATION: FalseBATCH GENERATION: FalseMONTHLY GENERATION: XQGGEN STATUS CD: vicki.zumbrunnen@paccar.comFORM CONTACT EMAIL: (425) 468-7055FORM CONTACT PHONE NBR: UNITED STATESFORM CONTACT COUNTRY: BELLEVUE, WA 98009-1518FORM CONTACT CITY,ST,ZIP: PO BOX 1518FORM CONTACT ADDR LINE1: Vicki ZumBrunnenFORM CONTACT NAME: vicki.zumbrunnen@paccar.comSITE CONTACT EMAIL: (425) 468-7055SITE CONTACT PHONE NBR: UNITED STATESSITE CONTACT COUNTRY: BELLEVUE, WA 98009-1518SITE CONTACT ZIP: PO BOX 1518SITE CONTACT ADDR LINE1: Vicki ZumBrunnenSITE CONTACT NAME: Not reportedOPERATOR EFFECTIVE DATE: (425) 468-7400OPERATOR PHONE NBR: UNITED STATESOPERATOR COUNTRY: BELLEVUE, WA 98009OPERATOR CITY,ST,ZIP: PO Box 1518OPERATOR ADDR LINE1: PrivateOPERATOR ORG TYPE: PACCAR IncOPERATOR ORG NAME: (425)468-7055LAND PHONE NBR: UNITED STATESLAND COUNTRY: BELLEVUE, WA 98009-1518LAND CITY,ST,ZIP: 777 106th Ave NELAND ADDR LINE2: PO Box 1518LAND ADDR LINE1: Vicki ZumBrunnenLAND PERSON NAME: PrivateLAND ORG TYPE: PACIFIC CAR & FOUNDRY CO. (Continued) 1000251921 TC2826208.2s Page 25 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation Vicki ZumBrunnenSITE CONTACT NAME: Not reportedOPERATOR EFFECTIVE DATE: (425) 468-7400OPERATOR PHONE NBR: UNITED STATESOPERATOR COUNTRY: BELLEVUE, WA 98009OPERATOR CITY,ST,ZIP: PO Box 1518OPERATOR ADDR LINE1: PrivateOPERATOR ORG TYPE: PACCAR IncOPERATOR ORG NAME: (425)468-7055LAND PHONE NBR: UNITED STATESLAND COUNTRY: BELLEVUE, WA 98009-1518LAND CITY,ST,ZIP: 777 106th Ave NELAND ADDR LINE2: PO Box 1518LAND ADDR LINE1: Vicki ZumBrunnenLAND PERSON NAME: PrivateLAND ORG TYPE: PACCAR IncLAND ORG NAME: 2/6/1996LEGAL EFFECTIVE DATE: (425)468-7055LEGAL PHONE NBR: UNITED STATESLEGAL COUNTRY: BELLEVUE, WA 98009-1518LEGAL CITY,ST,ZIP: PO Box 1518LEGAL ADDR LINE1: PrivateLEGAL ORG TYPE: Paccar IncLEGAL ORG NAME: UNITED STATESMAIL COUNTRY: BELLEVUE, WA 98009-1518MAIL CITY,ST,ZIP: PO Box 1518MAIL ADDR LINE1: PACCAR IncMAIL NAME: Truck manufacturingBUSINESS TYPE: 331513NAICS CD: 177000505TAX REG NBR: Not reportedFacility Address 2: WAD009249210EPA ID: FALSEOff-specification used oil burner - industrial furnace: FALSEOff-specification used oil burner - industrial boiler: FALSEOff-specification used oil burner - utility boiler: FALSEDestination Facility for Universal Waste: FALSEUniversal waste - lamps - accumulate: FALSEUniversal waste - mercury - accumulate: FALSEUniversal waste - thermostats - accumulate: FALSEUniversal waste - batteries - accumulate: FALSEUniversal waste - lamps - generate: FALSEUniversal waste - mercury - generate: FALSEUniversal waste - thermostats - generate: FALSEUniversal waste - batteries - generate: FALSESmelter defferal: FALSEIndustrial Furnace: FALSEIndustry boiler burner: FALSEUtility boiler burner: FALSE"Other marketers (i.e., blender, distributor, etc.)": FALSEGenerator marketing to burner: FALSEGenerator of dangerous fuel waste: FALSETreatment/Storage/Disposal/Recycling Facility: FALSEImmediate recycler: FALSEImporter of hazardous waste: FALSEMixed radioactive waste: FALSETreatment by Generator: FALSEPermit by Rule: PACIFIC CAR & FOUNDRY CO. (Continued) 1000251921 TC2826208.2s Page 26 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation NoVessel Draft Restriction: NoSwimming Restriction: NoSurface Water Restriction: NoSoil Restriction: NoShellfish Harvesting Restrictions: NoRestrictive Signage: YesProperty Use Restriction: YesPhysical Measures: NoNo Wake Zone: NoNo Dredge Zone: NoMaintenance Requirements: YesGroundwater Restriction: NoFinfish Harvesting Restrictions: NoFinancial Assurance: NoEducation Programs: NoDrinking Water Restrictions: NoAnchorage Restrictions: Not reportedStatus Date: ActiveStatus: Not reportedFiling Date Of Individual IC Doc: 199111262431County Filing # For Individual IC Doc: Restrictive CovenantDocument Type: Consent Decree (CD)Decision Type: 2065Facility Site ID: INST CONTROL: additional WA MANIFEST: detail in the EDR Site Report. Click this hyperlink while viewing on your computer to access FALSEUSED OIL FUEL MRKTR MEETS SPECS: FALSEUSED OIL FUEL MRKTR DIRECTS SHPMNTS: FALSEUSED OIL REREFINER: FALSEUSED OIL PROCESSOR: FALSEUSED OIL TRANSFER FACLTY: FALSEUSED OIL TRANSPORTER: FALSEUW BATTERY GEN: Not reportedOTHER EXEMPTION: FALSETRANSFER FACILITY: FALSERECYCLER ONSITE: FALSETRANSPORTS OTHRS WASTE: FALSETRANSPORTS OWN WASTE: FALSEONE TIME GENERATION: FALSEBATCH GENERATION: FALSEMONTHLY GENERATION: XQGGEN STATUS CD: vicki.zumbrunnen@paccar.comFORM CONTACT EMAIL: (425) 468-7055FORM CONTACT PHONE NBR: UNITED STATESFORM CONTACT COUNTRY: BELLEVUE, WA 98009-1518FORM CONTACT CITY,ST,ZIP: PO BOX 1518FORM CONTACT ADDR LINE1: Vicki ZumBrunnenFORM CONTACT NAME: vicki.zumbrunnen@paccar.comSITE CONTACT EMAIL: (425) 468-7055SITE CONTACT PHONE NBR: UNITED STATESSITE CONTACT COUNTRY: BELLEVUE, WA 98009-1518SITE CONTACT ZIP: PO BOX 1518SITE CONTACT ADDR LINE1: PACIFIC CAR & FOUNDRY CO. (Continued) 1000251921 TC2826208.2s Page 27 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation NoVessel Draft Restriction: NoSwimming Restriction: NoSurface Water Restriction: NoSoil Restriction: NoShellfish Harvesting Restrictions: NoRestrictive Signage: YesProperty Use Restriction: YesPhysical Measures: NoNo Wake Zone: NoNo Dredge Zone: NoMaintenance Requirements: YesGroundwater Restriction: NoFinfish Harvesting Restrictions: NoFinancial Assurance: NoEducation Programs: NoDrinking Water Restrictions: NoAnchorage Restrictions: Not reportedStatus Date: ActiveStatus: Not reportedFiling Date Of Individual IC Doc: Not reportedCounty Filing # For Individual IC Doc: Restrictive CovenantDocument Type: Consent Decree (CD)Decision Type: 2065Facility Site ID: PACIFIC CAR & FOUNDRY CO. (Continued) 1000251921 Laundries - Self ServeType: 1991Year: CLEANING SHOPPE THE SUNG KANGName: Laundries Self ServeType: 1985Year: CLEANING SHOPPE THEName: Laundries Self ServeType: 1980Year: CLEANING SHOPPE THEName: Laundries Self ServeType: 1977Year: CLEANING SHOPPE THEName: EDR Historical Cleaners: 400 ft. Site 1 of 3 in cluster A 0.076 mi. Relative: Higher Actual: 350 ft. < 1/8 RENTON, WA ESE 2830 NE SUNSET BLVD N/A A1 EDR Historical CleanersCLEANING SHOPPE THE SUNG KANG 1009613069 TC2826208.2s Page 28 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation 110005339507Registry ID: FINDS: No violations foundViolation Status: Commercial status unknownOff-site waste receiver: NoUsed oil transporter: NoUsed oil transfer facility: NoUsed oil Specification marketer: NoUsed oil fuel marketer to burner: NoUser oil refiner: NoUsed oil processor: NoUsed oil fuel burner: NoFurnace exemption: NoOn-site burner exemption: NoUnderground injection activity: NoTreater, storer or disposer of HW: NoTransporter of hazardous waste: NoRecycler of hazardous waste: NoMixed waste (haz. and radioactive): NoU.S. importer of hazardous waste: Handler Activities Summary: Not reportedOwner/Op end date: 08/22/1986Owner/Op start date: OwnerOwner/Operator Type: PrivateLegal status: Not reportedOwner/operator telephone: USOwner/operator country: RENTON, WA 98056 2830 NE SUNSET BLVDOwner/operator address: CLEANING SHOPPEOwner/operator name: Owner/Operator Summary: Handler: Non-Generators do not presently generate hazardous wasteDescription: Non-GeneratorClassification: 10EPA Region: Not reportedContact email: (425)228-4653Contact telephone: USContact country: RENTON, WA 98056-3106 2830 NE SUNSET BLVDContact address: SUNG KANGContact: RENTON, WA 98056-3106 2830 NE SUNSET BLVDMailing address: WAD980986996EPA ID: RENTON, WA 98056 2830 SUNSET BLVD NEFacility address: CLEANING SHOPPEFacility name: 08/22/1986Date form received by agency: RCRA-NonGen: 400 ft. Site 2 of 3 in cluster A 0.076 mi.Inactive Drycleaners Relative: Higher Actual: 350 ft. < 1/8 ALLSITESRENTON, WA 98056 ESE FINDS2830 SUNSET BLVD NE WAD980986996 A2 RCRA-NonGenCLEANING SHOPPE 1000107853 TC2826208.2s Page 29 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation Not reportedLEGAL ZIP: Not reportedLEGAL STATE: Not reportedLEGAL CITY: Not reportedLEGAL LINE2: Not reportedLEGAL LINE1: Not reportedLEGAL PERSON LAST NAME: Not reportedLEGAL PERSON MIDDLE INIT: Not reportedLEGAL PERSON FIRST NAME: Not reportedLEGAL ORG NAME: Not reportedMAIL COUNTRY: Not reportedMAIL ZIP: Not reportedMAIL STATE: Not reportedMAIL CITY: Not reportedMAIL LINE2: Not reportedMAIL LINE1: Not reportedMAIL NAME: Not reportedBUSINESS TYPE: Not reportedTAX REG NBR: Not reportedState Waste Code Desc: Not reportedFed Waste Code Desc: 81232NAICS Code: WAD980986996Facility ID: 2617FS Id: WAD980986996EPA I: Inactive Drycleaners: 1/20/1987Interaction End Date: 8/22/1986Interaction Start Date: WAD980986996Federal Program Indentifier: IInteraction Status: Hazardous Waste GeneratorInteraction (Aka Env Int) Description: HWGInteraction (Aka Env Int) Type Code: 19537445Geographic Location Identifier (Alias Facid): NLocation Verified Code: 99Coordinate Point Geographic Position Code: 99Horizontal Accuracy Code: 99Coordinate Point Areal Extent Code: -122.1814Longitude Decimal Degrees: 47.500540000000001Latitude Decimal Degrees: Cleaning ShoppeFacility Name: 19537445Geographic location identifier (alias facid): -122.1814Longitude: 47.500540000000001Latitude: 19537445Facility Id: ALLSITES: corrective action activities required under RCRA. program staff to track the notification, permit, compliance, and and treat, store, or dispose of hazardous waste. RCRAInfo allows RCRA events and activities related to facilities that generate, transport, Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) program through the tracking of RCRAInfo is a national information system that supports the Resource Environmental Interest/Information System CLEANING SHOPPE (Continued)1000107853 TC2826208.2s Page 30 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation Not reportedTRANSPORTS OTHERS WASTE: Not reportedTRANSPORTS OWN WASTE: Not reportedONE TIME GENERATION: Not reportedBATCH GENERATION: Not reportedMONTHLY GENERATION: Not reportedGEN STATUS CD: Not reportedFORM CONTACT EMAIL: Not reportedFORM CONTACT PHONE NBR: Not reportedFORM CONTACT COUNTRY: Not reportedFORM CONTACT ZIP: Not reportedFORM CONTACT STATE: Not reportedFORM CONTACT CITY: Not reportedFORM CONTACT LINE2: Not reportedFORM CONTACT LINE1: Not reportedFORM CONTACT LAST NAME: Not reportedFORM CONTACT MIDDLE INIT: Not reportedFORM CONTACT FIRST NAME: Not reportedSITE CONTACT EMAIL: Not reportedSITE CONTACT PHONE NBR: Not reportedSITE CONTACT COUNTRY: Not reportedSITE CONTACT ZIP: Not reportedSITE CONTACT STATE: Not reportedSITE CONTACT CITY: Not reportedSITE CONTACT LINE2: Not reportedSITE CONTACT LINE1: Not reportedSITE CONTACT LAST NAME: Not reportedSITE CONTACT MIDDLE INIT: Not reportedSITE CONTACT FIRST NAME: Not reportedOPERATOR ORGANIZATION TYPE: Not reportedOPERATOR EFFECTIVE DATE: Not reportedOPERATOR PHONE NBR: Not reportedOPERATOR COUNTRY: Not reportedOPERATOR ZIP: Not reportedOPERATOR STATE: Not reportedOPERATOR CITY: Not reportedOPERATOR LINE2: Not reportedOPERATOR LINE1: Not reportedOPERATOR PERSON LAST NAME: Not reportedOPERATOR PERSON MIDDLE INIT: Not reportedOPERATOR PERSON FIRST NAME: Not reportedOPERATOR ORG NAME: Not reportedLAND ORGANIZATION TYPE: Not reportedLAND PHONE NBR: Not reportedLAND COUNTRY: Not reportedLAND ZIP: Not reportedLAND STATE: Not reportedLAND CITY: Not reportedLAND LINE2: Not reportedLAND LINE1: Not reportedLAND PERSON LAST NAME: Not reportedLAND PERSON MIDDLE INIT: Not reportedLAND PERSON FIRST NAME: Not reportedLAND ORG NAME: Not reportedLEGAL ORGANIZATION TYPE: Not reportedLEGAL EFFECTIVE DATE: Not reportedLEGAL PHONE NBR: Not reportedLEGAL COUNTRY: CLEANING SHOPPE (Continued)1000107853 TC2826208.2s Page 31 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation Not reportedComments: Not reportedUSED OIL FUEL MARKETER MEETS SPECS: Not reportedUSED OIL FUEL MARKETER DIR SHIPMENTS: Not reportedUSED OIL REREFINER: Not reportedUSED OIL PROCESSOR: Not reportedUSED OIL TRANSFER FACILITY: Not reportedUSED OIL TRANSPORTER: Not reportedOFF SPEC FURNACE: Not reportedOFF SPEC INDUSTRY BOILER: Not reportedOFF SPEC UTILITY BOILER: Not reportedUW DESTINATION FACILITY: Not reportedUW LAMPS ACCUM: Not reportedUW MERCURY ACCUM: Not reportedUW THERMOSTATS ACCUM: Not reportedUW BATTERY ACCUM: Not reportedUW LAMPS GEN: Not reportedUW MERCURY GEN: Not reportedUW THERMOSTATS GEN: Not reportedUW BATTERY GEN: Not reportedOTHER EXEMPTION: Not reportedSMALL QTY EXEMPTION: Not reportedSMELTER DEFERRAL: Not reportedFURNACE BURNER: Not reportedINDUSTRY BOILER BURNER: Not reportedUTILITY BOILER BURNER: Not reportedGEN OTHER MARKETERS: Not reportedGEN MARKET TO BURNER: Not reportedGEN DANG FUEL: Not reportedIMMEDIATE RECYCLER: Not reportedTSDR FACILITY: Not reportedIMPORTER: Not reportedMIXED RADIOACTIVE: Not reportedTBG: Not reportedPBR: Not reportedTRANSFER FACILITY: Not reportedRECYCLER ONSITE: CLEANING SHOPPE (Continued)1000107853 Underground Storage TankInteraction (Aka Env Int) Description: USTInteraction (Aka Env Int) Type Code: 93513387Geographic Location Identifier (Alias Facid): NLocation Verified Code: 5Coordinate Point Geographic Position Code: 6Horizontal Accuracy Code: 4Coordinate Point Areal Extent Code: -122.177902Longitude Decimal Degrees: 47.503402000000001Latitude Decimal Degrees: SUNSET BLVD SHELLFacility Name: 93513387Geographic location identifier (alias facid): -122.177902Longitude: 47.503402000000001Latitude: 93513387Facility Id: ALLSITES: 404 ft. Site 1 of 8 in cluster B 0.077 mi. Relative: Higher Actual: 345 ft. < 1/8 RENTON, WA 98056 SE UST2800 NE SUNSET BLVD N/A B3 ALLSITESSUNSET BLVD SHELL U000593777 TC2826208.2s Page 32 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation 1/1/0001Tank Closure Date: 1/1/0001Tank Permit Expiration Date: RemovedTank Status: 8/26/1996TankSystem Status Change Date: RemovedTankSystem Status: 1/1/0001Tank Upgrade Date: Not reportedCapacity: 12/31/1964Install Date: 5Tank Name: 33403Tank ID: A4370Tag Number: 8/6/1996Tank Actual Status Date: Not reportedPipe Tightness Test: Not reportedTank Second Release Detection: Not reportedTank Primary Release Detection: Not reportedPipe Corrosion Protection: Not reportedPipe Second Release Detection: Not reportedPipe Primary Release Detection: Not reportedPipe Construction: FiberglassPipe Material: Impressed CurrentTank Corrosion Protection: Not reportedTank Tightness Test: Single Wall TankTank Construction: SteelTank Material: Not reportedTank Overfill Prevention: Not reportedTank Spill Prevention: Not reportedTank Pumping System: 1/1/0001Tank Closure Date: 12/31/1998Tank Permit Expiration Date: RemovedTank Status: 8/26/1996TankSystem Status Change Date: RemovedTankSystem Status: 1/1/0001Tank Upgrade Date: Not reportedCapacity: 12/31/1964Install Date: 1Tank Name: 33359Tank ID: 4252270587Phone Number: 6019873830010001UBI: 40.4472000000112Long Sec: 10Long Min: -122Long Deg: 12.2472000000045Lat Sec: 30Lat Min: 47Lat Deg: 9559Site ID: 93513387Facility ID: UST: Not reportedInteraction End Date: 3/20/2000Interaction Start Date: 9559Federal Program Indentifier: AInteraction Status: SUNSET BLVD SHELL (Continued)U000593777 TC2826208.2s Page 33 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation 12/31/1998Tank Permit Expiration Date: RemovedTank Status: 8/26/1996TankSystem Status Change Date: RemovedTankSystem Status: 1/1/0001Tank Upgrade Date: Not reportedCapacity: 12/31/1964Install Date: 2Tank Name: 33519Tank ID: A4370Tag Number: 8/6/1996Tank Actual Status Date: Not reportedPipe Tightness Test: Not reportedTank Second Release Detection: Not reportedTank Primary Release Detection: Not reportedPipe Corrosion Protection: Not reportedPipe Second Release Detection: Not reportedPipe Primary Release Detection: Not reportedPipe Construction: FiberglassPipe Material: Impressed CurrentTank Corrosion Protection: Not reportedTank Tightness Test: Single Wall TankTank Construction: SteelTank Material: Not reportedTank Overfill Prevention: Not reportedTank Spill Prevention: Not reportedTank Pumping System: 1/1/0001Tank Closure Date: 1/1/0001Tank Permit Expiration Date: RemovedTank Status: 8/26/1996TankSystem Status Change Date: RemovedTankSystem Status: 1/1/0001Tank Upgrade Date: Not reportedCapacity: 12/31/1964Install Date: 3Tank Name: 33474Tank ID: A4370Tag Number: 8/6/1996Tank Actual Status Date: Not reportedPipe Tightness Test: Not reportedTank Second Release Detection: Not reportedTank Primary Release Detection: Not reportedPipe Corrosion Protection: Not reportedPipe Second Release Detection: Not reportedPipe Primary Release Detection: Not reportedPipe Construction: FiberglassPipe Material: Not reportedTank Corrosion Protection: Not reportedTank Tightness Test: Single Wall TankTank Construction: Fiberglass Reinforced PlasticTank Material: Not reportedTank Overfill Prevention: Not reportedTank Spill Prevention: Not reportedTank Pumping System: SUNSET BLVD SHELL (Continued)U000593777 TC2826208.2s Page 34 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation OperationalTank Status: 1/1/0001TankSystem Status Change Date: OperationalTankSystem Status: 10/15/1996Tank Upgrade Date: 10,000 to 19,999 GallonsCapacity: 10/15/1996Install Date: ATank Name: 412489Tank ID: A4370Tag Number: 8/6/1996Tank Actual Status Date: Not reportedPipe Tightness Test: Not reportedTank Second Release Detection: Not reportedTank Primary Release Detection: Not reportedPipe Corrosion Protection: Not reportedPipe Second Release Detection: Not reportedPipe Primary Release Detection: Not reportedPipe Construction: FiberglassPipe Material: Impressed CurrentTank Corrosion Protection: Not reportedTank Tightness Test: Single Wall TankTank Construction: SteelTank Material: Not reportedTank Overfill Prevention: Not reportedTank Spill Prevention: Not reportedTank Pumping System: 1/1/0001Tank Closure Date: 1/1/0001Tank Permit Expiration Date: RemovedTank Status: 8/26/1996TankSystem Status Change Date: RemovedTankSystem Status: 1/1/0001Tank Upgrade Date: Not reportedCapacity: 12/31/1964Install Date: 4Tank Name: 33630Tank ID: A4370Tag Number: 8/6/1996Tank Actual Status Date: Not reportedPipe Tightness Test: Not reportedTank Second Release Detection: Not reportedTank Primary Release Detection: Not reportedPipe Corrosion Protection: Not reportedPipe Second Release Detection: Not reportedPipe Primary Release Detection: Not reportedPipe Construction: FiberglassPipe Material: Impressed CurrentTank Corrosion Protection: Not reportedTank Tightness Test: Single Wall TankTank Construction: SteelTank Material: Not reportedTank Overfill Prevention: Not reportedTank Spill Prevention: Not reportedTank Pumping System: 1/1/0001Tank Closure Date: SUNSET BLVD SHELL (Continued)U000593777 TC2826208.2s Page 35 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation A4370Tag Number: 5/15/1997Tank Actual Status Date: AnnualPipe Tightness Test: Not reportedTank Second Release Detection: Automatic Tank GaugingTank Primary Release Detection: Corrosion ResistantPipe Corrosion Protection: Not reportedPipe Second Release Detection: Automatic Line Leak DetectionPipe Primary Release Detection: Double Wall PipePipe Construction: Flexible PipingPipe Material: Sacrificial AnodeTank Corrosion Protection: Not reportedTank Tightness Test: Double Wall TankTank Construction: Coated SteelTank Material: Ball Float Valve (vent line)Tank Overfill Prevention: Spill Bucket/Spill BoxTank Spill Prevention: Pressurized SystemTank Pumping System: 1/1/0001Tank Closure Date: 10/31/2010Tank Permit Expiration Date: OperationalTank Status: 1/1/0001TankSystem Status Change Date: OperationalTankSystem Status: 10/15/1996Tank Upgrade Date: 10,000 to 19,999 GallonsCapacity: 10/15/1996Install Date: BTank Name: 412490Tank ID: A4370Tag Number: 5/15/1997Tank Actual Status Date: AnnualPipe Tightness Test: Not reportedTank Second Release Detection: Automatic Tank GaugingTank Primary Release Detection: Corrosion ResistantPipe Corrosion Protection: Not reportedPipe Second Release Detection: Automatic Line Leak DetectionPipe Primary Release Detection: Double Wall PipePipe Construction: Flexible PipingPipe Material: Sacrificial AnodeTank Corrosion Protection: Not reportedTank Tightness Test: Double Wall TankTank Construction: Coated SteelTank Material: Ball Float Valve (vent line)Tank Overfill Prevention: Spill Bucket/Spill BoxTank Spill Prevention: Pressurized SystemTank Pumping System: 1/1/0001Tank Closure Date: 10/31/2010Tank Permit Expiration Date: SUNSET BLVD SHELL (Continued)U000593777 TC2826208.2s Page 36 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation Gasoline StationsType: 1985Year: GULL SERVICE STATIONName: Gasoline StationsType: 1980Year: HIGHLAND EXXON SERVName: Gasoline StationsType: 1977Year: HIGHLAND EXXON PRODUCTSName: EDR Historical Auto Stations: 404 ft. Site 2 of 8 in cluster B 0.077 mi. Relative: Higher Actual: 345 ft. < 1/8 RENTON, WA SE 2800 NE SUNSET BLVD N/A B4 EDR Historical Auto StationsGULL SERVICE STATION 1009615255 5/31/1997Interaction Start Date: 7021Federal Program Indentifier: IInteraction Status: LUST FacilityInteraction (Aka Env Int) Description: LUSTInteraction (Aka Env Int) Type Code: 79696523Geographic Location Identifier (Alias Facid): 4/10/2000Interaction End Date: 4/3/1998Interaction Start Date: 7021Federal Program Indentifier: IInteraction Status: Voluntary Cleanup SitesInteraction (Aka Env Int) Description: VOLCLNSTInteraction (Aka Env Int) Type Code: 79696523Geographic Location Identifier (Alias Facid): Not reportedInteraction End Date: 6/15/1987Interaction Start Date: 7021Federal Program Indentifier: AInteraction Status: Underground Storage TankInteraction (Aka Env Int) Description: USTInteraction (Aka Env Int) Type Code: 79696523Geographic Location Identifier (Alias Facid): NLocation Verified Code: 5Coordinate Point Geographic Position Code: 6Horizontal Accuracy Code: 4Coordinate Point Areal Extent Code: -122.177902Longitude Decimal Degrees: 47.503402000000001Latitude Decimal Degrees: JC MARTFacility Name: 79696523Geographic location identifier (alias facid): -122.177902Longitude: 47.503402000000001Latitude: 79696523Facility Id: ALLSITES: 404 ft. Site 3 of 8 in cluster B 0.077 mi.VCP Relative: Higher Actual: 345 ft. < 1/8 USTRENTON, WA 98056 SE CSCSL NFA2801 NE SUNSET BLVD N/A B5 ALLSITESJC MART U003027996 TC2826208.2s Page 37 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation 8/3/1998Tank Upgrade Date: 10,000 to 19,999 GallonsCapacity: 6/15/1987Install Date: 3Tank Name: 37398Tank ID: A3784Tag Number: 8/6/1996Tank Actual Status Date: AnnualPipe Tightness Test: Not reportedTank Second Release Detection: Automatic Tank GaugingTank Primary Release Detection: Corrosion ResistantPipe Corrosion Protection: Not reportedPipe Second Release Detection: Automatic Line Leak DetectionPipe Primary Release Detection: Double Wall PipePipe Construction: Flexible PipingPipe Material: Sacrificial AnodeTank Corrosion Protection: Not PerformedTank Tightness Test: Single Wall TankTank Construction: SteelTank Material: Automatic Shutoff (fill pipe)Tank Overfill Prevention: Spill Bucket/Spill BoxTank Spill Prevention: Pressurized SystemTank Pumping System: 1/1/0001Tank Closure Date: 10/31/2010Tank Permit Expiration Date: OperationalTank Status: 6/11/2001TankSystem Status Change Date: OperationalTankSystem Status: 8/3/1998Tank Upgrade Date: 10,000 to 19,999 GallonsCapacity: 6/15/1987Install Date: 2Tank Name: 37326Tank ID: 4252279340Phone Number: 6026634100010001UBI: 40.4472000000112Long Sec: 10Long Min: -122Long Deg: 12.2472000000045Lat Sec: 30Lat Min: 47Lat Deg: 7021Site ID: 79696523Facility ID: UST: YVCP: Not reportedRank: 4/10/2000NFA Date: NFA after assessment, IRAP, or VCPNFA Type: 79696523Facility/Site Id: CSCSL NFA: 4/10/2000Interaction End Date: JC MART (Continued)U003027996 TC2826208.2s Page 38 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation 98056-3105edr_zip: KINGedr_fcnty: 98056edr_fzip: WAedr_fstat: VCP: A3784Tag Number: 8/6/1996Tank Actual Status Date: AnnualPipe Tightness Test: Not reportedTank Second Release Detection: Automatic Tank GaugingTank Primary Release Detection: Corrosion ResistantPipe Corrosion Protection: Not reportedPipe Second Release Detection: Automatic Line Leak DetectionPipe Primary Release Detection: Double Wall PipePipe Construction: Flexible PipingPipe Material: Sacrificial AnodeTank Corrosion Protection: Not PerformedTank Tightness Test: Single Wall TankTank Construction: SteelTank Material: Automatic Shutoff (fill pipe)Tank Overfill Prevention: Spill Bucket/Spill BoxTank Spill Prevention: Pressurized SystemTank Pumping System: 1/1/0001Tank Closure Date: 10/31/2010Tank Permit Expiration Date: OperationalTank Status: 6/11/2001TankSystem Status Change Date: OperationalTankSystem Status: 8/3/1998Tank Upgrade Date: 10,000 to 19,999 GallonsCapacity: 6/15/1987Install Date: 1Tank Name: 37424Tank ID: A3784Tag Number: 8/6/1996Tank Actual Status Date: AnnualPipe Tightness Test: Not reportedTank Second Release Detection: Automatic Tank GaugingTank Primary Release Detection: Corrosion ResistantPipe Corrosion Protection: Not reportedPipe Second Release Detection: Automatic Line Leak DetectionPipe Primary Release Detection: Double Wall PipePipe Construction: Flexible PipingPipe Material: Sacrificial AnodeTank Corrosion Protection: Not PerformedTank Tightness Test: Single Wall TankTank Construction: SteelTank Material: Automatic Shutoff (fill pipe)Tank Overfill Prevention: Spill Bucket/Spill BoxTank Spill Prevention: Pressurized SystemTank Pumping System: 1/1/0001Tank Closure Date: 10/31/2010Tank Permit Expiration Date: OperationalTank Status: 6/11/2001TankSystem Status Change Date: OperationalTankSystem Status: JC MART (Continued)U003027996 TC2826208.2s Page 39 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation Not reportedRank: 4/10/2000Date NFA: NFA after assessment, IRAP, or VCPNFA Type: Not reportedEcology Status: YVCP: Not reportedVCP Status: 79696523Facility ID: JC MART (Continued)U003027996 Not reportedReport Title: Not reportedContact: 17County Code: 98-26Site Register Issue: Interim cleanup reportType of Report Ecology Received: North WesternRegion: TankWaste Management: SoilMedia Contaminated: Petroleum productsContaminants Found at Site: 08/30/99Date Ecology Received Report: Not reportedReport Title: Not reportedContact: 17County Code: 98-26Site Register Issue: Interim cleanup reportType of Report Ecology Received: North WesternRegion: TankWaste Management: SoilMedia Contaminated: Petroleum productsContaminants Found at Site: 10/21/99Date Ecology Received Report: Not reportedReport Title: Not reportedContact: 17County Code: 98-26Site Register Issue: Final cleanup reportType of Report Ecology Received: North WesternRegion: TankWaste Management: SoilMedia Contaminated: Petroleum productsContaminants Found at Site: 01/05/00Date Ecology Received Report: Not reportedReport Title: Not reportedContact: 17County Code: 95-18Site Register Issue: Interim cleanup reportType of Report Ecology Received: North WesternRegion: TankWaste Management: SoilMedia Contaminated: Petroleum productsContaminants Found at Site: 01/20/98Date Ecology Received Report: ICR: 404 ft. Site 4 of 8 in cluster B 0.077 mi. Relative: Higher Actual: 345 ft. < 1/8 NEWCASTLE, WA 98056 SE 2801 NE SUNSET BLVD. N/A B6 ICRJC MART S104873007 TC2826208.2s Page 40 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation Ground Water Sampling Report - First Quarter 1999Report Title: Not reportedContact: 17County Code: 98-31Site Register Issue: Interim cleanup reportType of Report Ecology Received: North WesternRegion: TankWaste Management: SoilMedia Contaminated: Petroleum productsContaminants Found at Site: 06/03/99Date Ecology Received Report: JC MART (Continued)S104873007 Laundries - Self ServeType: 1991Year: RENTON HIGHLANDER CENTER DONALD M MALONEName: Laundries Self ServeType: 1985Year: RENTON HIGHLANDER CENTERName: Laundries Self ServeType: 1980Year: RENTON HIGHLANDER CENTERName: Laundries Self ServeType: 1977Year: RENTON HIGHLANDER CENTERName: EDR Historical Cleaners: 409 ft. Site 5 of 8 in cluster B 0.077 mi. Relative: Higher Actual: 345 ft. < 1/8 RENTON, WA SE 2806 NE 10TH ST N/A B7 EDR Historical CleanersRENTON HIGHLANDER CENTER DONALD M MALONE 1009613062 Non-GeneratorClassification: 10EPA Region: Not reportedContact email: (206)762-1368Contact telephone: USContact country: SEATTLE, WA 98146-1304 10257 17TH AVE SWContact address: LEWIS YAYOIContact: SEATTLE, WA 98146-1304 10257 17TH AVE SWMailing address: WAD982654717EPA ID: RENTON, WA 98056 2808 NE 10THFacility address: HIGHLANDS ONE HOUR CLEANERS INFacility name: 01/04/1989Date form received by agency: RCRA-NonGen: 409 ft. Site 6 of 8 in cluster B 0.077 mi.Inactive Drycleaners Relative: Higher Actual: 345 ft. < 1/8 ALLSITESRENTON, WA 98056 SE FINDS2808 NE 10TH WAD982654717 B8 RCRA-NonGenHIGHLANDS ONE HOUR CLEANERS IN 1000242447 TC2826208.2s Page 41 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation 99Horizontal Accuracy Code: 99Coordinate Point Areal Extent Code: -122.18066Longitude Decimal Degrees: 47.499780000000001Latitude Decimal Degrees: Highlands One Hour Cleaners INFacility Name: 64311383Geographic location identifier (alias facid): -122.18066Longitude: 47.499780000000001Latitude: 64311383Facility Id: ALLSITES: corrective action activities required under RCRA. program staff to track the notification, permit, compliance, and and treat, store, or dispose of hazardous waste. RCRAInfo allows RCRA events and activities related to facilities that generate, transport, Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) program through the tracking of RCRAInfo is a national information system that supports the Resource Environmental Interest/Information System 110005346376Registry ID: FINDS: No violations foundViolation Status: Commercial status unknownOff-site waste receiver: NoUsed oil transporter: NoUsed oil transfer facility: NoUsed oil Specification marketer: NoUsed oil fuel marketer to burner: NoUser oil refiner: NoUsed oil processor: NoUsed oil fuel burner: NoFurnace exemption: NoOn-site burner exemption: NoUnderground injection activity: NoTreater, storer or disposer of HW: NoTransporter of hazardous waste: NoRecycler of hazardous waste: NoMixed waste (haz. and radioactive): NoU.S. importer of hazardous waste: Handler Activities Summary: Not reportedOwner/Op end date: 01/04/1989Owner/Op start date: OwnerOwner/Operator Type: PrivateLegal status: Not reportedOwner/operator telephone: USOwner/operator country: SEATTLE, WA 98146 10257 17TH AVE SWOwner/operator address: HIGHLANDS ONE HOUR CLEANERS INCOwner/operator name: Owner/Operator Summary: Handler: Non-Generators do not presently generate hazardous wasteDescription: HIGHLANDS ONE HOUR CLEANERS IN (Continued) 1000242447 TC2826208.2s Page 42 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation Not reportedOPERATOR PERSON LAST NAME: Not reportedOPERATOR PERSON MIDDLE INIT: Not reportedOPERATOR PERSON FIRST NAME: Not reportedOPERATOR ORG NAME: Not reportedLAND ORGANIZATION TYPE: Not reportedLAND PHONE NBR: Not reportedLAND COUNTRY: Not reportedLAND ZIP: Not reportedLAND STATE: Not reportedLAND CITY: Not reportedLAND LINE2: Not reportedLAND LINE1: Not reportedLAND PERSON LAST NAME: Not reportedLAND PERSON MIDDLE INIT: Not reportedLAND PERSON FIRST NAME: Not reportedLAND ORG NAME: Not reportedLEGAL ORGANIZATION TYPE: Not reportedLEGAL EFFECTIVE DATE: Not reportedLEGAL PHONE NBR: Not reportedLEGAL COUNTRY: Not reportedLEGAL ZIP: Not reportedLEGAL STATE: Not reportedLEGAL CITY: Not reportedLEGAL LINE2: Not reportedLEGAL LINE1: Not reportedLEGAL PERSON LAST NAME: Not reportedLEGAL PERSON MIDDLE INIT: Not reportedLEGAL PERSON FIRST NAME: Not reportedLEGAL ORG NAME: Not reportedMAIL COUNTRY: Not reportedMAIL ZIP: Not reportedMAIL STATE: Not reportedMAIL CITY: Not reportedMAIL LINE2: Not reportedMAIL LINE1: Not reportedMAIL NAME: Not reportedBUSINESS TYPE: Not reportedTAX REG NBR: Not reportedState Waste Code Desc: Not reportedFed Waste Code Desc: 81232NAICS Code: WAD982654717Facility ID: 7292FS Id: WAD982654717EPA I: Inactive Drycleaners: 9/23/1991Interaction End Date: 1/4/1989Interaction Start Date: WAD982654717Federal Program Indentifier: IInteraction Status: Hazardous Waste GeneratorInteraction (Aka Env Int) Description: HWGInteraction (Aka Env Int) Type Code: 64311383Geographic Location Identifier (Alias Facid): NLocation Verified Code: 99Coordinate Point Geographic Position Code: HIGHLANDS ONE HOUR CLEANERS IN (Continued) 1000242447 TC2826208.2s Page 43 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation Not reportedUW MERCURY GEN: Not reportedUW THERMOSTATS GEN: Not reportedUW BATTERY GEN: Not reportedOTHER EXEMPTION: Not reportedSMALL QTY EXEMPTION: Not reportedSMELTER DEFERRAL: Not reportedFURNACE BURNER: Not reportedINDUSTRY BOILER BURNER: Not reportedUTILITY BOILER BURNER: Not reportedGEN OTHER MARKETERS: Not reportedGEN MARKET TO BURNER: Not reportedGEN DANG FUEL: Not reportedIMMEDIATE RECYCLER: Not reportedTSDR FACILITY: Not reportedIMPORTER: Not reportedMIXED RADIOACTIVE: Not reportedTBG: Not reportedPBR: Not reportedTRANSFER FACILITY: Not reportedRECYCLER ONSITE: Not reportedTRANSPORTS OTHERS WASTE: Not reportedTRANSPORTS OWN WASTE: Not reportedONE TIME GENERATION: Not reportedBATCH GENERATION: Not reportedMONTHLY GENERATION: Not reportedGEN STATUS CD: Not reportedFORM CONTACT EMAIL: Not reportedFORM CONTACT PHONE NBR: Not reportedFORM CONTACT COUNTRY: Not reportedFORM CONTACT ZIP: Not reportedFORM CONTACT STATE: Not reportedFORM CONTACT CITY: Not reportedFORM CONTACT LINE2: Not reportedFORM CONTACT LINE1: Not reportedFORM CONTACT LAST NAME: Not reportedFORM CONTACT MIDDLE INIT: Not reportedFORM CONTACT FIRST NAME: Not reportedSITE CONTACT EMAIL: Not reportedSITE CONTACT PHONE NBR: Not reportedSITE CONTACT COUNTRY: Not reportedSITE CONTACT ZIP: Not reportedSITE CONTACT STATE: Not reportedSITE CONTACT CITY: Not reportedSITE CONTACT LINE2: Not reportedSITE CONTACT LINE1: Not reportedSITE CONTACT LAST NAME: Not reportedSITE CONTACT MIDDLE INIT: Not reportedSITE CONTACT FIRST NAME: Not reportedOPERATOR ORGANIZATION TYPE: Not reportedOPERATOR EFFECTIVE DATE: Not reportedOPERATOR PHONE NBR: Not reportedOPERATOR COUNTRY: Not reportedOPERATOR ZIP: Not reportedOPERATOR STATE: Not reportedOPERATOR CITY: Not reportedOPERATOR LINE2: Not reportedOPERATOR LINE1: HIGHLANDS ONE HOUR CLEANERS IN (Continued) 1000242447 TC2826208.2s Page 44 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation Not reportedComments: Not reportedUSED OIL FUEL MARKETER MEETS SPECS: Not reportedUSED OIL FUEL MARKETER DIR SHIPMENTS: Not reportedUSED OIL REREFINER: Not reportedUSED OIL PROCESSOR: Not reportedUSED OIL TRANSFER FACILITY: Not reportedUSED OIL TRANSPORTER: Not reportedOFF SPEC FURNACE: Not reportedOFF SPEC INDUSTRY BOILER: Not reportedOFF SPEC UTILITY BOILER: Not reportedUW DESTINATION FACILITY: Not reportedUW LAMPS ACCUM: Not reportedUW MERCURY ACCUM: Not reportedUW THERMOSTATS ACCUM: Not reportedUW BATTERY ACCUM: Not reportedUW LAMPS GEN: HIGHLANDS ONE HOUR CLEANERS IN (Continued) 1000242447 BLACK DIAMOND, WA 98010 PO BOX 390Owner/operator address: ROBERT MALONEOwner/operator name: Owner/Operator Summary: hazardous waste the cleanup of a spill, into or on any land or water, of acutely any residue or contaminated soil, waste or other debris resulting from time: 1 kg or less of acutely hazardous waste; or 100 kg or less of hazardous waste during any calendar month, and accumulates at any from the cleanup of a spill, into or on any land or water, of acutely of any residue or contaminated soil, waste or other debris resulting land or water, of acutely hazardous waste; or generates 100 kg or less other debris resulting from the cleanup of a spill, into or on any waste; or 100 kg or less of any residue or contaminated soil, waste or month, and accumulates at any time: 1 kg or less of acutely hazardous or generates 1 kg or less of acutely hazardous waste per calendar month, and accumulates 1000 kg or less of hazardous waste at any time; Handler: generates 100 kg or less of hazardous waste per calendarDescription: Conditionally Exempt Small Quantity GeneratorClassification: 10EPA Region: Not reportedContact email: (360)825-0449Contact telephone: USContact country: BLACK DIAMOND, WA 98010-0390 PO BOX 390Contact address: ROBERT L MALONEContact: BLACK DIAMOND, WA 98010-0390 PO BOX 390Mailing address: WAD980988117EPA ID: RENTON, WA 98056 2806 NE 10THFacility address: RENTON HIGHLANDER CENTER INCFacility name: 06/28/2004Date form received by agency: RCRA-CESQG: 409 ft. Site 7 of 8 in cluster B 0.077 mi.Inactive Drycleaners Relative: Higher Actual: 345 ft. < 1/8 ALLSITESRENTON, WA 98056 SE FINDS2806 NE 10TH WAD980988117 B9 RCRA-CESQGRENTON HIGHLANDER CENTER INC 1004793759 TC2826208.2s Page 45 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation -122.18068Longitude: 47.499780000000001Latitude: 73177425Facility Id: ALLSITES: corrective action activities required under RCRA. program staff to track the notification, permit, compliance, and and treat, store, or dispose of hazardous waste. RCRAInfo allows RCRA events and activities related to facilities that generate, transport, Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) program through the tracking of RCRAInfo is a national information system that supports the Resource Quality Programs. Quality, Dam Safety, Hazardous Waste, Toxics Cleanup, and Water facility/site that is currently, or has been, of interest to the Air Department of Ecology. This system contains key information for each means to query and display data maintained by the Washington Washington Facility / Site Identification System (WA-FSIS) provides a Environmental Interest/Information System 110005339883Registry ID: FINDS: No violations foundViolation Status: Not a generator, verifiedClassification: RENTON HIGHLANDER CENTER INCFacility name: 12/31/2003Date form received by agency: Historical Generators: Commercial status unknownOff-site waste receiver: NoUsed oil transporter: NoUsed oil transfer facility: NoUsed oil Specification marketer: NoUsed oil fuel marketer to burner: NoUser oil refiner: NoUsed oil processor: NoUsed oil fuel burner: NoFurnace exemption: NoOn-site burner exemption: NoUnderground injection activity: NoTreater, storer or disposer of HW: NoTransporter of hazardous waste: NoRecycler of hazardous waste: NoMixed waste (haz. and radioactive): NoU.S. importer of hazardous waste: Handler Activities Summary: Not reportedOwner/Op end date: 05/21/1996Owner/Op start date: OperatorOwner/Operator Type: PrivateLegal status: Not reportedOwner/operator telephone: USOwner/operator country: RENTON HIGHLANDER CENTER INC (Continued) 1004793759 TC2826208.2s Page 46 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation Not reportedLAND COUNTRY: Not reportedLAND ZIP: Not reportedLAND STATE: Not reportedLAND CITY: Not reportedLAND LINE2: Not reportedLAND LINE1: Not reportedLAND PERSON LAST NAME: Not reportedLAND PERSON MIDDLE INIT: Not reportedLAND PERSON FIRST NAME: Not reportedLAND ORG NAME: Not reportedLEGAL ORGANIZATION TYPE: Not reportedLEGAL EFFECTIVE DATE: Not reportedLEGAL PHONE NBR: Not reportedLEGAL COUNTRY: Not reportedLEGAL ZIP: Not reportedLEGAL STATE: Not reportedLEGAL CITY: Not reportedLEGAL LINE2: Not reportedLEGAL LINE1: Not reportedLEGAL PERSON LAST NAME: Not reportedLEGAL PERSON MIDDLE INIT: Not reportedLEGAL PERSON FIRST NAME: Not reportedLEGAL ORG NAME: Not reportedMAIL COUNTRY: Not reportedMAIL ZIP: Not reportedMAIL STATE: Not reportedMAIL CITY: Not reportedMAIL LINE2: Not reportedMAIL LINE1: Not reportedMAIL NAME: Not reportedBUSINESS TYPE: Not reportedTAX REG NBR: Not reportedState Waste Code Desc: Not reportedFed Waste Code Desc: 81232NAICS Code: WAD980988117Facility ID: 8202FS Id: WAD980988117EPA I: Inactive Drycleaners: 12/31/2003Interaction End Date: 9/22/1986Interaction Start Date: WAD980988117Federal Program Indentifier: IInteraction Status: Hazardous Waste GeneratorInteraction (Aka Env Int) Description: HWGInteraction (Aka Env Int) Type Code: 73177425Geographic Location Identifier (Alias Facid): NLocation Verified Code: 99Coordinate Point Geographic Position Code: 99Horizontal Accuracy Code: 99Coordinate Point Areal Extent Code: -122.18068Longitude Decimal Degrees: 47.499780000000001Latitude Decimal Degrees: Renton Highlander Center IncFacility Name: 73177425Geographic location identifier (alias facid): RENTON HIGHLANDER CENTER INC (Continued) 1004793759 TC2826208.2s Page 47 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation Not reportedFURNACE BURNER: Not reportedINDUSTRY BOILER BURNER: Not reportedUTILITY BOILER BURNER: Not reportedGEN OTHER MARKETERS: Not reportedGEN MARKET TO BURNER: Not reportedGEN DANG FUEL: Not reportedIMMEDIATE RECYCLER: Not reportedTSDR FACILITY: Not reportedIMPORTER: Not reportedMIXED RADIOACTIVE: Not reportedTBG: Not reportedPBR: Not reportedTRANSFER FACILITY: Not reportedRECYCLER ONSITE: Not reportedTRANSPORTS OTHERS WASTE: Not reportedTRANSPORTS OWN WASTE: Not reportedONE TIME GENERATION: Not reportedBATCH GENERATION: Not reportedMONTHLY GENERATION: Not reportedGEN STATUS CD: Not reportedFORM CONTACT EMAIL: Not reportedFORM CONTACT PHONE NBR: Not reportedFORM CONTACT COUNTRY: Not reportedFORM CONTACT ZIP: Not reportedFORM CONTACT STATE: Not reportedFORM CONTACT CITY: Not reportedFORM CONTACT LINE2: Not reportedFORM CONTACT LINE1: Not reportedFORM CONTACT LAST NAME: Not reportedFORM CONTACT MIDDLE INIT: Not reportedFORM CONTACT FIRST NAME: Not reportedSITE CONTACT EMAIL: Not reportedSITE CONTACT PHONE NBR: Not reportedSITE CONTACT COUNTRY: Not reportedSITE CONTACT ZIP: Not reportedSITE CONTACT STATE: Not reportedSITE CONTACT CITY: Not reportedSITE CONTACT LINE2: Not reportedSITE CONTACT LINE1: Not reportedSITE CONTACT LAST NAME: Not reportedSITE CONTACT MIDDLE INIT: Not reportedSITE CONTACT FIRST NAME: Not reportedOPERATOR ORGANIZATION TYPE: Not reportedOPERATOR EFFECTIVE DATE: Not reportedOPERATOR PHONE NBR: Not reportedOPERATOR COUNTRY: Not reportedOPERATOR ZIP: Not reportedOPERATOR STATE: Not reportedOPERATOR CITY: Not reportedOPERATOR LINE2: Not reportedOPERATOR LINE1: Not reportedOPERATOR PERSON LAST NAME: Not reportedOPERATOR PERSON MIDDLE INIT: Not reportedOPERATOR PERSON FIRST NAME: Not reportedOPERATOR ORG NAME: Not reportedLAND ORGANIZATION TYPE: Not reportedLAND PHONE NBR: RENTON HIGHLANDER CENTER INC (Continued) 1004793759 TC2826208.2s Page 48 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation Not reportedComments: Not reportedUSED OIL FUEL MARKETER MEETS SPECS: Not reportedUSED OIL FUEL MARKETER DIR SHIPMENTS: Not reportedUSED OIL REREFINER: Not reportedUSED OIL PROCESSOR: Not reportedUSED OIL TRANSFER FACILITY: Not reportedUSED OIL TRANSPORTER: Not reportedOFF SPEC FURNACE: Not reportedOFF SPEC INDUSTRY BOILER: Not reportedOFF SPEC UTILITY BOILER: Not reportedUW DESTINATION FACILITY: Not reportedUW LAMPS ACCUM: Not reportedUW MERCURY ACCUM: Not reportedUW THERMOSTATS ACCUM: Not reportedUW BATTERY ACCUM: Not reportedUW LAMPS GEN: Not reportedUW MERCURY GEN: Not reportedUW THERMOSTATS GEN: Not reportedUW BATTERY GEN: Not reportedOTHER EXEMPTION: Not reportedSMALL QTY EXEMPTION: Not reportedSMELTER DEFERRAL: RENTON HIGHLANDER CENTER INC (Continued) 1004793759 Cleaners And DyersType: 1991Year: HIGHLANDS ONE HOUR MARTINIZING ROLAND AND YAYOI LName: Cleaners And DyersType: 1985Year: HIGHLANDS ONE HOUR MARTINIZINGName: Cleaners And DyersType: 1980Year: HIGHLANDS ONE HOUR MARTINIZINGName: Cleaners And DyersType: 1977Year: HIGHLANDS ONE HOUR MARTINIZINGName: EDR Historical Cleaners: 409 ft. Site 8 of 8 in cluster B 0.077 mi. Relative: Higher Actual: 345 ft. < 1/8 RENTON, WA SE 2808 NE 10TH ST N/A B10 EDR Historical CleanersHIGHLANDS ONE HOUR MARTINIZING ROLAND AND YAYOI L 1009613064 RENTON, WA 98056 2801 SUNSET BLVD NEFacility address: PLAID PANTRIES INCFacility name: 04/01/1987Date form received by agency: RCRA-NonGen: 410 ft. Site 3 of 3 in cluster A 0.078 mi. Relative: Higher Actual: 347 ft. < 1/8 ALLSITESRENTON, WA 98056 SE FINDS2801 SUNSET BLVD NE WAD981764095 A11 RCRA-NonGenPLAID PANTRIES INC 1000247676 TC2826208.2s Page 49 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation corrective action activities required under RCRA. program staff to track the notification, permit, compliance, and and treat, store, or dispose of hazardous waste. RCRAInfo allows RCRA events and activities related to facilities that generate, transport, Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) program through the tracking of RCRAInfo is a national information system that supports the Resource Environmental Interest/Information System 110005341193Registry ID: FINDS: No violations foundViolation Status: Commercial status unknownOff-site waste receiver: NoUsed oil transporter: NoUsed oil transfer facility: NoUsed oil Specification marketer: NoUsed oil fuel marketer to burner: NoUser oil refiner: NoUsed oil processor: NoUsed oil fuel burner: NoFurnace exemption: NoOn-site burner exemption: NoUnderground injection activity: NoTreater, storer or disposer of HW: NoTransporter of hazardous waste: NoRecycler of hazardous waste: NoMixed waste (haz. and radioactive): NoU.S. importer of hazardous waste: Handler Activities Summary: Not reportedOwner/Op end date: 04/01/1987Owner/Op start date: OwnerOwner/Operator Type: PrivateLegal status: Not reportedOwner/operator telephone: USOwner/operator country: SEATTLE, WA 98109 601 VALLEY ST STE 309Owner/operator address: PLAID PANTRIES INCOwner/operator name: Owner/Operator Summary: Handler: Non-Generators do not presently generate hazardous wasteDescription: Non-GeneratorClassification: 10EPA Region: Not reportedContact email: (206)282-2734Contact telephone: USContact country: SEATTLE, WA 98109-4229 601 VALLEY ST STE 309Contact address: RICHARD PIACENTINIContact: SEATTLE, WA 98109-4229 601 VALLEY ST STE 309Mailing address: WAD981764095EPA ID: PLAID PANTRIES INC (Continued)1000247676 TC2826208.2s Page 50 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation 2/18/1988Interaction End Date: 4/1/1987Interaction Start Date: WAD981764095Federal Program Indentifier: IInteraction Status: Hazardous Waste GeneratorInteraction (Aka Env Int) Description: HWGInteraction (Aka Env Int) Type Code: 1542985Geographic Location Identifier (Alias Facid): NLocation Verified Code: 99Coordinate Point Geographic Position Code: 99Horizontal Accuracy Code: 99Coordinate Point Areal Extent Code: -122.18151Longitude Decimal Degrees: 47.500430000000001Latitude Decimal Degrees: Plaid Pantries IncFacility Name: 1542985Geographic location identifier (alias facid): -122.18151Longitude: 47.500430000000001Latitude: 1542985Facility Id: ALLSITES: PLAID PANTRIES INC (Continued)1000247676 Automobile RepairingType: 1991Year: HIGHLAND AUTOMOTIVE MICHL SCHIMMELName: Automobile RepairingType: 1985Year: HIGHLAND TIRE AND AUTOMOTIVEName: EDR Historical Auto Stations: 763 ft. 0.145 mi. Relative: Lower Actual: 310 ft. 1/8-1/4 RENTON, WA SW 2615 NE SUNSET BLVD N/A 12 EDR Historical Auto StationsHIGHLAND AUTOMOTIVE MICHL SCHIMMEL 1009615198 Automobile RepairingType: 1977Year: FARRELL S SERVICE SHOPName: EDR Historical Auto Stations: 941 ft. Site 1 of 2 in cluster C 0.178 mi. Relative: Lower Actual: 319 ft. 1/8-1/4 RENTON, WA South 960 HARRINGTON AVE N/A C13 EDR Historical Auto StationsFARRELL S SERVICE SHOP 1009616126 TC2826208.2s Page 51 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation Automobile RepairingType: 1980Year: FARRELL S SERVICE SHOPName: EDR Historical Auto Stations: 1017 ft. Site 2 of 2 in cluster C 0.193 mi. Relative: Lower Actual: 317 ft. 1/8-1/4 RENTON, WA South 950 HARRINGTON AVE N/A C14 EDR Historical Auto StationsFARRELL S SERVICE SHOP 1009616115 Closure in ProcessTank Status: 8/26/1996TankSystem Status Change Date: Closure in ProcessTankSystem Status: 1/1/0001Tank Upgrade Date: Not reportedCapacity: 12/31/1964Install Date: 1Tank Name: 14085Tank ID: 2062352326Phone Number: Not reportedUBI: 7.66320000000405Long Sec: 11Long Min: -122Long Deg: 9.54719999999156Lat Sec: 30Lat Min: 47Lat Deg: 102245Site ID: 61253889Facility ID: UST: 5/3/2000Interaction End Date: 3/14/1994Interaction Start Date: 102245Federal Program Indentifier: IInteraction Status: Underground Storage TankInteraction (Aka Env Int) Description: USTInteraction (Aka Env Int) Type Code: 61253889Geographic Location Identifier (Alias Facid): NLocation Verified Code: 5Coordinate Point Geographic Position Code: 6Horizontal Accuracy Code: 4Coordinate Point Areal Extent Code: -122.185462Longitude Decimal Degrees: 47.502651999999998Latitude Decimal Degrees: MCKNIGHT MIDDLE SCHOOLFacility Name: 61253889Geographic location identifier (alias facid): -122.185462Longitude: 47.502651999999998Latitude: 61253889Facility Id: ALLSITES: 1036 ft. 0.196 mi. Relative: Higher Actual: 349 ft. 1/8-1/4 RENTON, WA 98055 NNW UST2600 NE 12TH ST N/A 15 ALLSITESMCKNIGHT MIDDLE SCHOOL U001778202 TC2826208.2s Page 52 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation Not reportedTag Number: 8/6/1996Tank Actual Status Date: Not reportedPipe Tightness Test: Not reportedTank Second Release Detection: Not reportedTank Primary Release Detection: Not reportedPipe Corrosion Protection: Not reportedPipe Second Release Detection: Not reportedPipe Primary Release Detection: Not reportedPipe Construction: Not reportedPipe Material: Not reportedTank Corrosion Protection: Not reportedTank Tightness Test: Not reportedTank Construction: Not reportedTank Material: Not reportedTank Overfill Prevention: Not reportedTank Spill Prevention: Not reportedTank Pumping System: 1/1/0001Tank Closure Date: 1/1/0001Tank Permit Expiration Date: MCKNIGHT MIDDLE SCHOOL (Continued) U001778202 NoRecycler of hazardous waste: NoMixed waste (haz. and radioactive): NoU.S. importer of hazardous waste: Handler Activities Summary: Not reportedOwner/Op end date: 04/25/1986Owner/Op start date: OwnerOwner/Operator Type: PrivateLegal status: Not reportedOwner/operator telephone: USOwner/operator country: RENTON, WA 98056 900 HARRINGTON AVE NEOwner/operator address: RENTON MARINEOwner/operator name: Owner/Operator Summary: Handler: Non-Generators do not presently generate hazardous wasteDescription: Non-GeneratorClassification: 10EPA Region: Not reportedContact email: (425)226-1288Contact telephone: USContact country: RENTON, WA 98056-3012 900 HARRINGTON AVE NEContact address: DONALD BUSHOREContact: WAD980983134EPA ID: RENTON, WA 98056 900 HARRINGTON AVE NEFacility address: RENTON MARINEFacility name: 04/25/1986Date form received by agency: RCRA-NonGen: 1059 ft. Site 1 of 3 in cluster D 0.201 mi.UST Relative: Lower Actual: 317 ft. 1/8-1/4 ALLSITESRENTON, WA 98056 South FINDS900 HARRINGTON AVE NE WAD980983134 D16 RCRA-NonGenRENTON MARINE 1000417421 TC2826208.2s Page 53 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation 4/22/1989Interaction End Date: 4/25/1986Interaction Start Date: WAD980983134Federal Program Indentifier: IInteraction Status: Hazardous Waste GeneratorInteraction (Aka Env Int) Description: HWGInteraction (Aka Env Int) Type Code: 44562671Geographic Location Identifier (Alias Facid): NLocation Verified Code: 5Coordinate Point Geographic Position Code: 6Horizontal Accuracy Code: 4Coordinate Point Areal Extent Code: -122.182982Longitude Decimal Degrees: 47.497452000000003Latitude Decimal Degrees: Renton MarineFacility Name: 44562671Geographic location identifier (alias facid): -122.182982Longitude: 47.497452000000003Latitude: 44562671Facility Id: ALLSITES: corrective action activities required under RCRA. program staff to track the notification, permit, compliance, and and treat, store, or dispose of hazardous waste. RCRAInfo allows RCRA events and activities related to facilities that generate, transport, Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) program through the tracking of RCRAInfo is a national information system that supports the Resource Quality Programs. Quality, Dam Safety, Hazardous Waste, Toxics Cleanup, and Water facility/site that is currently, or has been, of interest to the Air Department of Ecology. This system contains key information for each means to query and display data maintained by the Washington Washington Facility / Site Identification System (WA-FSIS) provides a Environmental Interest/Information System 110005338045Registry ID: FINDS: No violations foundViolation Status: Commercial status unknownOff-site waste receiver: NoUsed oil transporter: NoUsed oil transfer facility: NoUsed oil Specification marketer: NoUsed oil fuel marketer to burner: NoUser oil refiner: NoUsed oil processor: NoUsed oil fuel burner: NoFurnace exemption: NoOn-site burner exemption: NoUnderground injection activity: NoTreater, storer or disposer of HW: NoTransporter of hazardous waste: RENTON MARINE (Continued)1000417421 TC2826208.2s Page 54 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation 8/26/1996TankSystem Status Change Date: Closed in PlaceTankSystem Status: 1/1/0001Tank Upgrade Date: Not reportedCapacity: 12/31/1964Install Date: 2Tank Name: 42277Tank ID: Not reportedTag Number: 8/6/1996Tank Actual Status Date: Not reportedPipe Tightness Test: Not reportedTank Second Release Detection: Not reportedTank Primary Release Detection: Not reportedPipe Corrosion Protection: Not reportedPipe Second Release Detection: Not reportedPipe Primary Release Detection: Not reportedPipe Construction: SteelPipe Material: Not reportedTank Corrosion Protection: Not reportedTank Tightness Test: Not reportedTank Construction: SteelTank Material: Not reportedTank Overfill Prevention: Not reportedTank Spill Prevention: Not reportedTank Pumping System: 1/1/0001Tank Closure Date: 1/1/0001Tank Permit Expiration Date: Closed in PlaceTank Status: 8/26/1996TankSystem Status Change Date: Closed in PlaceTankSystem Status: 1/1/0001Tank Upgrade Date: Not reportedCapacity: 12/31/1964Install Date: 1Tank Name: 42167Tank ID: 2062261288Phone Number: Not reportedUBI: 58.7351999999839Long Sec: 10Long Min: -122Long Deg: 50.8272000000096Lat Sec: 29Lat Min: 47Lat Deg: 9198Site ID: 44562671Facility ID: UST: 5/3/2000Interaction End Date: 2/29/2000Interaction Start Date: 9198Federal Program Indentifier: IInteraction Status: Underground Storage TankInteraction (Aka Env Int) Description: USTInteraction (Aka Env Int) Type Code: 44562671Geographic Location Identifier (Alias Facid): RENTON MARINE (Continued)1000417421 TC2826208.2s Page 55 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation Not reportedTag Number: 8/6/1996Tank Actual Status Date: Not reportedPipe Tightness Test: Not reportedTank Second Release Detection: Not reportedTank Primary Release Detection: Not reportedPipe Corrosion Protection: Not reportedPipe Second Release Detection: Not reportedPipe Primary Release Detection: Not reportedPipe Construction: SteelPipe Material: Not reportedTank Corrosion Protection: Not reportedTank Tightness Test: Not reportedTank Construction: SteelTank Material: Not reportedTank Overfill Prevention: Not reportedTank Spill Prevention: Not reportedTank Pumping System: 1/1/0001Tank Closure Date: 1/1/0001Tank Permit Expiration Date: Closed in PlaceTank Status: RENTON MARINE (Continued)1000417421 Not reportedOwner/Op end date: 03/14/1997Owner/Op start date: OperatorOwner/Operator Type: PrivateLegal status: Not reportedOwner/operator telephone: USOwner/operator country: HOUSTON, TX 77079 600 NORTH DAIRY ASHFORDOwner/operator address: KAYO OILOwner/operator name: Owner/Operator Summary: Handler: Non-Generators do not presently generate hazardous wasteDescription: Non-GeneratorClassification: PrivateLand type: 10EPA Region: Not reportedContact email: (510)245-5176Contact telephone: USContact country: HOUSTON, TX 77079 600 NORTH DAIRY ASHFORDContact address: TIANA ANDRIAMANARIVOContact: HOUSTON, TX 77079 600 NORTH DAIRY ASHFORDMailing address: WAD988487096EPA ID: RENTON, WA 98056 3002 SUNSET BLVD NEFacility address: CONOCOPHILLIPS 2705509Facility name: 02/06/2008Date form received by agency: RCRA-NonGen: 1073 ft.ICRSite 1 of 2 in cluster E 0.203 mi.MANIFEST Relative: Higher Actual: 364 ft. 1/8-1/4 CSCSL NFARENTON, WA 98056 NE ALLSITES3002 SUNSET BLVD NE WAD988487096 E17 RCRA-NonGenCONOCOPHILLIPS 2705509 1000659047 TC2826208.2s Page 56 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation Haz Waste Management ActivityInteraction (Aka Env Int) Description: HWOTHERInteraction (Aka Env Int) Type Code: 5448Geographic Location Identifier (Alias Facid): NLocation Verified Code: 8Coordinate Point Geographic Position Code: 13Horizontal Accuracy Code: 99Coordinate Point Areal Extent Code: -122.178291Longitude Decimal Degrees: 47.502662999999998Latitude Decimal Degrees: ConocoPhillips 2705509Facility Name: 5448Geographic location identifier (alias facid): -122.178291Longitude: 47.502662999999998Latitude: 5448Facility Id: ALLSITES: StateEvaluation lead agency: Not reportedDate achieved compliance: Not reportedArea of violation: COMPLIANCE ASSISTANCE VISITEvaluation: 07/15/1991Evaluation date: Evaluation Action Summary: No violations foundViolation Status: Not a generator, verifiedClassification: CONOCOPHILLIPS 2705509Facility name: 12/31/2003Date form received by agency: Not a generator, verifiedClassification: CONOCOPHILLIPS 2705509Facility name: 12/31/2005Date form received by agency: Not a generator, verifiedClassification: CONOCOPHILLIPS 2705509Facility name: 12/31/2007Date form received by agency: Historical Generators: Commercial status unknownOff-site waste receiver: NoUsed oil transporter: NoUsed oil transfer facility: NoUsed oil Specification marketer: NoUsed oil fuel marketer to burner: NoUser oil refiner: NoUsed oil processor: NoUsed oil fuel burner: NoFurnace exemption: NoOn-site burner exemption: NoUnderground injection activity: NoTreater, storer or disposer of HW: NoTransporter of hazardous waste: NoRecycler of hazardous waste: NoMixed waste (haz. and radioactive): NoU.S. importer of hazardous waste: Handler Activities Summary: CONOCOPHILLIPS 2705509 (Continued) 1000659047 TC2826208.2s Page 57 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation Not reportedInteraction End Date: 3/20/2000Interaction Start Date: 8684Federal Program Indentifier: AInteraction Status: Underground Storage TankInteraction (Aka Env Int) Description: USTInteraction (Aka Env Int) Type Code: 13912313Geographic Location Identifier (Alias Facid): 8/19/1996Interaction End Date: 11/1/1991Interaction Start Date: 8684Federal Program Indentifier: IInteraction Status: LUST FacilityInteraction (Aka Env Int) Description: LUSTInteraction (Aka Env Int) Type Code: 13912313Geographic Location Identifier (Alias Facid): Not reportedLocation Verified Code: 8Coordinate Point Geographic Position Code: 6Horizontal Accuracy Code: 4Coordinate Point Areal Extent Code: -122.17806702999999Longitude Decimal Degrees: 47.502839680000001Latitude Decimal Degrees: BP STORE 5509Facility Name: 13912313Geographic location identifier (alias facid): -122.178067035966Longitude: 47.5028396882688Latitude: 13912313Facility Id: 3/31/1997Interaction End Date: 3/30/1997Interaction Start Date: Not reportedFederal Program Indentifier: IInteraction Status: Independent Remedial Actn PrgInteraction (Aka Env Int) Description: IRAPInteraction (Aka Env Int) Type Code: 5448Geographic Location Identifier (Alias Facid): 7/4/1776Interaction End Date: 1/1/1988Interaction Start Date: WAD988487096Federal Program Indentifier: IInteraction Status: Emergency/Haz Chem Rpt TIER2Interaction (Aka Env Int) Description: TIER2Interaction (Aka Env Int) Type Code: 5448Geographic Location Identifier (Alias Facid): 12/31/2004Interaction End Date: 5/22/1991Interaction Start Date: WAD988487096Federal Program Indentifier: IInteraction Status: Hazardous Waste GeneratorInteraction (Aka Env Int) Description: HWGInteraction (Aka Env Int) Type Code: 5448Geographic Location Identifier (Alias Facid): 12/31/2008Interaction End Date: 12/31/2004Interaction Start Date: WAD988487096Federal Program Indentifier: IInteraction Status: CONOCOPHILLIPS 2705509 (Continued) 1000659047 TC2826208.2s Page 58 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation PrivateLAND ORG TYPE: ConocoPhillips CompanyLAND ORG NAME: 12/31/2003LEGAL EFFECTIVE DATE: 281-293-1000LEGAL PHONE NBR: UNITED STATESLEGAL COUNTRY: Houston, TX 77079LEGAL CITY,ST,ZIP: 600 North Dairy AshfordLEGAL ADDR LINE1: PrivateLEGAL ORG TYPE: ConocoPhillips CompanyLEGAL ORG NAME: UNITED STATESMAIL COUNTRY: Houston, TX 77079MAIL CITY,ST,ZIP: 600 North Dairy AshfordMAIL ADDR LINE1: ConocoPhillips CompanyMAIL NAME: Not reportedBUSINESS TYPE: 44719NAICS CD: 600115909TAX REG NBR: Not reportedFacility Address 2: WAD988487096EPA ID: FalseOff-specification used oil burner - industrial furnace: FalseOff-specification used oil burner - industrial boiler: FalseOff-specification used oil burner - utility boiler: FalseDestination Facility for Universal Waste: FalseUniversal waste - lamps - accumulate: FalseUniversal waste - mercury - accumulate: FalseUniversal waste - thermostats - accumulate: FalseUniversal waste - batteries - accumulate: FalseUniversal waste - lamps - generate: FalseUniversal waste - mercury - generate: FalseUniversal waste - thermostats - generate: FalseUniversal waste - batteries - generate: FalseSmelter defferal: FalseIndustrial Furnace: FalseIndustry boiler burner: FalseUtility boiler burner: False"Other marketers (i.e., blender, distributor, etc.)": FalseGenerator marketing to burner: FalseGenerator of dangerous fuel waste: FalseTreatment/Storage/Disposal/Recycling Facility: FalseImmediate recycler: FalseImporter of hazardous waste: FalseMixed radioactive waste: FalseTreatment by Generator: FalsePermit by Rule: Not reportedData Year: Not reportedForm Comm: Not reportedFWC Desc: Not reportedSWC Desc: 5448Facility Site ID Number: WA MANIFEST: Not reportedVCP: Not reportedRank: 8/19/1996NFA Date: NFA after assessment, IRAP, or VCPNFA Type: 5448Facility/Site Id: CSCSL NFA: CONOCOPHILLIPS 2705509 (Continued) 1000659047 TC2826208.2s Page 59 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation FALSEIndustry boiler burner: FALSEUtility boiler burner: FALSE"Other marketers (i.e., blender, distributor, etc.)": FALSEGenerator marketing to burner: FALSEGenerator of dangerous fuel waste: FALSETreatment/Storage/Disposal/Recycling Facility: FALSEImmediate recycler: FALSEImporter of hazardous waste: FALSEMixed radioactive waste: FALSETreatment by Generator: FALSEPermit by Rule: Not reportedData Year: Not reportedForm Comm: Not reportedFWC Desc: Not reportedSWC Desc: 5448Facility Site ID Number: FalseUSED OIL FUEL MRKTR MEETS SPECS: FalseUSED OIL FUEL MRKTR DIRECTS SHPMNTS: FalseUSED OIL REREFINER: FalseUSED OIL PROCESSOR: FalseUSED OIL TRANSFER FACLTY: FalseUSED OIL TRANSPORTER: FalseUW BATTERY GEN: Not reportedOTHER EXEMPTION: FalseTRANSFER FACILITY: FalseRECYCLER ONSITE: FalseTRANSPORTS OTHRS WASTE: FalseTRANSPORTS OWN WASTE: FalseONE TIME GENERATION: FalseBATCH GENERATION: FalseMONTHLY GENERATION: XQGGEN STATUS CD: thomas.r.border@conocophillips.comFORM CONTACT EMAIL: 281-293-4335FORM CONTACT PHONE NBR: UNITED STATESFORM CONTACT COUNTRY: Houston, TX 77079FORM CONTACT CITY,ST,ZIP: 600 North Dairy Ashford, TA1026BFORM CONTACT ADDR LINE1: Thomas R BorderFORM CONTACT NAME: Irene.I.Jimenez@ConocoPhillips.comSITE CONTACT EMAIL: 510-245-5176SITE CONTACT PHONE NBR: UNITED STATESSITE CONTACT COUNTRY: Rodeo, CA 94572SITE CONTACT ZIP: 1380 San Pablo AveSITE CONTACT ADDR LINE1: Tiana AndriamanarivoSITE CONTACT NAME: 03/14/97OPERATOR EFFECTIVE DATE: 510-245-5176OPERATOR PHONE NBR: UNITED STATESOPERATOR COUNTRY: Rodeo, CA 94572OPERATOR CITY,ST,ZIP: 1380 San Pablo AveOPERATOR ADDR LINE1: PrivateOPERATOR ORG TYPE: Kayo OilOPERATOR ORG NAME: 281-293-1000LAND PHONE NBR: UNITED STATESLAND COUNTRY: Houston, TX 77079LAND CITY,ST,ZIP: 600 North Dairy AshfordLAND ADDR LINE1: Not reportedLAND PERSON NAME: CONOCOPHILLIPS 2705509 (Continued) 1000659047 TC2826208.2s Page 60 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation XQGGEN STATUS CD: thomas.r.border@conocophillips.comFORM CONTACT EMAIL: 281-293-4335FORM CONTACT PHONE NBR: UNITED STATESFORM CONTACT COUNTRY: Houston, TX 77079FORM CONTACT CITY,ST,ZIP: 600 North Dairy Ashford, TA1026BFORM CONTACT ADDR LINE1: Thomas R BorderFORM CONTACT NAME: Irene.I.Jimenez@ConocoPhillips.comSITE CONTACT EMAIL: 510-245-5176SITE CONTACT PHONE NBR: UNITED STATESSITE CONTACT COUNTRY: Rodeo, CA 94572SITE CONTACT ZIP: 1380 San Pablo AveSITE CONTACT ADDR LINE1: Tiana AndriamanarivoSITE CONTACT NAME: 3/14/1997OPERATOR EFFECTIVE DATE: 510-245-5176OPERATOR PHONE NBR: UNITED STATESOPERATOR COUNTRY: Rodeo, CA 94572OPERATOR CITY,ST,ZIP: 1380 San Pablo AveOPERATOR ADDR LINE1: PrivateOPERATOR ORG TYPE: Kayo OilOPERATOR ORG NAME: 281-293-1000LAND PHONE NBR: UNITED STATESLAND COUNTRY: Houston, TX 77079LAND CITY,ST,ZIP: 600 North Dairy AshfordLAND ADDR LINE1: Not reportedLAND PERSON NAME: PrivateLAND ORG TYPE: ConocoPhillips CompanyLAND ORG NAME: 12/31/2003LEGAL EFFECTIVE DATE: 281-293-1000LEGAL PHONE NBR: UNITED STATESLEGAL COUNTRY: Houston, TX 77079LEGAL CITY,ST,ZIP: 600 North Dairy AshfordLEGAL ADDR LINE1: PrivateLEGAL ORG TYPE: ConocoPhillips CompanyLEGAL ORG NAME: UNITED STATESMAIL COUNTRY: Houston, TX 77079MAIL CITY,ST,ZIP: 600 North Dairy AshfordMAIL ADDR LINE1: ConocoPhillips CompanyMAIL NAME: Not reportedBUSINESS TYPE: 44719NAICS CD: 600115909TAX REG NBR: Not reportedFacility Address 2: WAD988487096EPA ID: FALSEOff-specification used oil burner - industrial furnace: FALSEOff-specification used oil burner - industrial boiler: FALSEOff-specification used oil burner - utility boiler: FALSEDestination Facility for Universal Waste: FALSEUniversal waste - lamps - accumulate: FALSEUniversal waste - mercury - accumulate: FALSEUniversal waste - thermostats - accumulate: FALSEUniversal waste - batteries - accumulate: FALSEUniversal waste - lamps - generate: FALSEUniversal waste - mercury - generate: FALSEUniversal waste - thermostats - generate: FALSEUniversal waste - batteries - generate: FALSESmelter defferal: FALSEIndustrial Furnace: CONOCOPHILLIPS 2705509 (Continued) 1000659047 TC2826208.2s Page 61 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation PrivateLEGAL ORG TYPE: ConocoPhillips CompanyLEGAL ORG NAME: UNITED STATESMAIL COUNTRY: Houston, TX 77079MAIL CITY,ST,ZIP: 600 North Dairy AshfordMAIL ADDR LINE1: ConocoPhillips CompanyMAIL NAME: Not reportedBUSINESS TYPE: 44719NAICS CD: 600115909TAX REG NBR: Not reportedFacility Address 2: WAD988487096EPA ID: NoOff-specification used oil burner - industrial furnace: NoOff-specification used oil burner - industrial boiler: NoOff-specification used oil burner - utility boiler: NoDestination Facility for Universal Waste: NoUniversal waste - lamps - accumulate: NoUniversal waste - mercury - accumulate: NoUniversal waste - thermostats - accumulate: NoUniversal waste - batteries - accumulate: NoUniversal waste - lamps - generate: NoUniversal waste - mercury - generate: NoUniversal waste - thermostats - generate: NoUniversal waste - batteries - generate: NoSmelter defferal: NoIndustrial Furnace: NoIndustry boiler burner: NoUtility boiler burner: No"Other marketers (i.e., blender, distributor, etc.)": NoGenerator marketing to burner: NoGenerator of dangerous fuel waste: NoTreatment/Storage/Disposal/Recycling Facility: NoImmediate recycler: NoImporter of hazardous waste: NoMixed radioactive waste: NoTreatment by Generator: NoPermit by Rule: Not reportedData Year: Not reportedForm Comm: Not reportedFWC Desc: Not reportedSWC Desc: 5448Facility Site ID Number: FALSEUSED OIL FUEL MRKTR MEETS SPECS: FALSEUSED OIL FUEL MRKTR DIRECTS SHPMNTS: FALSEUSED OIL REREFINER: FALSEUSED OIL PROCESSOR: FALSEUSED OIL TRANSFER FACLTY: FALSEUSED OIL TRANSPORTER: FALSEUW BATTERY GEN: Not reportedOTHER EXEMPTION: FALSETRANSFER FACILITY: FALSERECYCLER ONSITE: FALSETRANSPORTS OTHRS WASTE: FALSETRANSPORTS OWN WASTE: FALSEONE TIME GENERATION: FALSEBATCH GENERATION: FALSEMONTHLY GENERATION: CONOCOPHILLIPS 2705509 (Continued) 1000659047 TC2826208.2s Page 62 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation FalseImporter of hazardous waste: FalseMixed radioactive waste: FalseTreatment by Generator: FalsePermit by Rule: 2008Data Year: Site SoldForm Comm: Not reportedFWC Desc: Not reportedSWC Desc: 5448Facility Site ID Number: NoUSED OIL FUEL MRKTR MEETS SPECS: NoUSED OIL FUEL MRKTR DIRECTS SHPMNTS: NoUSED OIL REREFINER: NoUSED OIL PROCESSOR: NoUSED OIL TRANSFER FACLTY: NoUSED OIL TRANSPORTER: NoUW BATTERY GEN: Not reportedOTHER EXEMPTION: NoTRANSFER FACILITY: NoRECYCLER ONSITE: NoTRANSPORTS OTHRS WASTE: NoTRANSPORTS OWN WASTE: NoONE TIME GENERATION: NoBATCH GENERATION: YesMONTHLY GENERATION: XQGGEN STATUS CD: Marina.A.Tishkova@conocophillips.comFORM CONTACT EMAIL: 281-293-4335FORM CONTACT PHONE NBR: UNITED STATESFORM CONTACT COUNTRY: Houston, TX 77079FORM CONTACT CITY,ST,ZIP: 600 North Dairy Ashford TA1026BFORM CONTACT ADDR LINE1: Marina TishkovaFORM CONTACT NAME: Irene.I.Jimenez@ConocoPhillips.comSITE CONTACT EMAIL: 510-245-5176SITE CONTACT PHONE NBR: UNITED STATESSITE CONTACT COUNTRY: Rodeo, CA 94572SITE CONTACT ZIP: 1380 San Pablo AveSITE CONTACT ADDR LINE1: Tiana AndriamanarivoSITE CONTACT NAME: 3/14/1997OPERATOR EFFECTIVE DATE: 510-245-5176OPERATOR PHONE NBR: UNITED STATESOPERATOR COUNTRY: Rodeo, CA 94572OPERATOR CITY,ST,ZIP: 1380 San Pablo AveOPERATOR ADDR LINE1: PrivateOPERATOR ORG TYPE: ConocoPhillipsOPERATOR ORG NAME: 281-293-1000LAND PHONE NBR: UNITED STATESLAND COUNTRY: Houston, TX 77079LAND CITY,ST,ZIP: 600 North Dairy AshfordLAND ADDR LINE1: Not reportedLAND PERSON NAME: PrivateLAND ORG TYPE: ConocoPhillips CompanyLAND ORG NAME: 12/31/2003LEGAL EFFECTIVE DATE: 281-293-1000LEGAL PHONE NBR: UNITED STATESLEGAL COUNTRY: Houston, TX 77079LEGAL CITY,ST,ZIP: 600 North Dairy AshfordLEGAL ADDR LINE1: CONOCOPHILLIPS 2705509 (Continued) 1000659047 TC2826208.2s Page 63 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation Irene.I.Jimenez@ConocoPhillips.comSITE CONTACT EMAIL: 510-245-5176SITE CONTACT PHONE NBR: UNITED STATESSITE CONTACT COUNTRY: Rodeo, CA 94572SITE CONTACT ZIP: 1380 San Pablo AveSITE CONTACT ADDR LINE1: Tiana AndriamanarivoSITE CONTACT NAME: 3/14/1997OPERATOR EFFECTIVE DATE: 510-245-5176OPERATOR PHONE NBR: UNITED STATESOPERATOR COUNTRY: Rodeo, CA 94572OPERATOR CITY,ST,ZIP: 1380 San Pablo AveOPERATOR ADDR LINE1: PrivateOPERATOR ORG TYPE: Kayo OilOPERATOR ORG NAME: 281-293-1000LAND PHONE NBR: UNITED STATESLAND COUNTRY: Houston, TX 77079LAND CITY,ST,ZIP: 600 North Dairy AshfordLAND ADDR LINE1: Not reportedLAND PERSON NAME: PrivateLAND ORG TYPE: ConocoPhillips CompanyLAND ORG NAME: 12/31/2003LEGAL EFFECTIVE DATE: 281-293-1000LEGAL PHONE NBR: UNITED STATESLEGAL COUNTRY: Houston, TX 77079LEGAL CITY,ST,ZIP: 600 North Dairy AshfordLEGAL ADDR LINE1: PrivateLEGAL ORG TYPE: ConocoPhillips CompanyLEGAL ORG NAME: UNITED STATESMAIL COUNTRY: Houston, TX 77079MAIL CITY,ST,ZIP: 600 North Dairy AshfordMAIL ADDR LINE1: ConocoPhillips CompanyMAIL NAME: Not reportedBUSINESS TYPE: 44719NAICS CD: 600115909TAX REG NBR: Not reportedFacility Address 2: WAD988487096EPA ID: FalseOff-specification used oil burner - industrial furnace: FalseOff-specification used oil burner - industrial boiler: FalseOff-specification used oil burner - utility boiler: FalseDestination Facility for Universal Waste: FalseUniversal waste - lamps - accumulate: FalseUniversal waste - mercury - accumulate: FalseUniversal waste - thermostats - accumulate: FalseUniversal waste - batteries - accumulate: FalseUniversal waste - lamps - generate: FalseUniversal waste - mercury - generate: FalseUniversal waste - thermostats - generate: FalseUniversal waste - batteries - generate: FalseSmelter defferal: FalseIndustrial Furnace: FalseIndustry boiler burner: FalseUtility boiler burner: False"Other marketers (i.e., blender, distributor, etc.)": FalseGenerator marketing to burner: FalseGenerator of dangerous fuel waste: FalseTreatment/Storage/Disposal/Recycling Facility: FalseImmediate recycler: CONOCOPHILLIPS 2705509 (Continued) 1000659047 TC2826208.2s Page 64 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation Not reportedReport Title: Not reportedContact: 17County Code: 92-25Site Register Issue: Interim cleanup reportType of Report Ecology Received: North WesternRegion: TankWaste Management: SoilMedia Contaminated: Petroleum productsContaminants Found at Site: 05/21/92Date Ecology Received Report: Not reportedReport Title: Not reportedContact: 17County Code: 93-48Site Register Issue: Final cleanup reportType of Report Ecology Received: North WesternRegion: TankWaste Management: Groundwater, SoilMedia Contaminated: Petroleum productsContaminants Found at Site: / /Date Ecology Received Report: Not reportedReport Title: Not reportedContact: 17County Code: 93-09Site Register Issue: Interim cleanup reportType of Report Ecology Received: North WesternRegion: TankWaste Management: Groundwater, SoilMedia Contaminated: Petroleum productsContaminants Found at Site: / /Date Ecology Received Report: ICR: FalseUSED OIL FUEL MRKTR MEETS SPECS: FalseUSED OIL FUEL MRKTR DIRECTS SHPMNTS: FalseUSED OIL REREFINER: FalseUSED OIL PROCESSOR: FalseUSED OIL TRANSFER FACLTY: FalseUSED OIL TRANSPORTER: FalseUW BATTERY GEN: Not reportedOTHER EXEMPTION: FalseTRANSFER FACILITY: FalseRECYCLER ONSITE: FalseTRANSPORTS OTHRS WASTE: FalseTRANSPORTS OWN WASTE: FalseONE TIME GENERATION: FalseBATCH GENERATION: FalseMONTHLY GENERATION: XQGGEN STATUS CD: thomas.r.border@conocophillips.comFORM CONTACT EMAIL: 281-293-4335FORM CONTACT PHONE NBR: UNITED STATESFORM CONTACT COUNTRY: Houston, TX 77079FORM CONTACT CITY,ST,ZIP: 600 North Dairy Ashford, TA1026BFORM CONTACT ADDR LINE1: Thomas R BorderFORM CONTACT NAME: CONOCOPHILLIPS 2705509 (Continued) 1000659047 TC2826208.2s Page 65 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation Petroleum productsContaminants Found at Site: 02/23/95Date Ecology Received Report: Not reportedReport Title: Not reportedContact: 17County Code: 93-48Site Register Issue: Interim cleanup reportType of Report Ecology Received: North WesternRegion: TankWaste Management: Groundwater, SoilMedia Contaminated: Petroleum productsContaminants Found at Site: 12/07/94Date Ecology Received Report: Not reportedReport Title: Not reportedContact: 17County Code: 93-30Site Register Issue: Interim cleanup reportType of Report Ecology Received: North WesternRegion: TankWaste Management: Groundwater, SoilMedia Contaminated: Petroleum productsContaminants Found at Site: 06/09/94Date Ecology Received Report: Not reportedReport Title: Not reportedContact: 17County Code: 93-21Site Register Issue: Interim cleanup reportType of Report Ecology Received: North WesternRegion: TankWaste Management: Groundwater, SoilMedia Contaminated: Petroleum productsContaminants Found at Site: 02/18/94Date Ecology Received Report: Not reportedReport Title: Not reportedContact: 17County Code: 92-52Site Register Issue: Interim cleanup reportType of Report Ecology Received: North WesternRegion: TankWaste Management: GroundwaterMedia Contaminated: Petroleum productsContaminants Found at Site: 05/05/93Date Ecology Received Report: Not reportedReport Title: Not reportedContact: 17County Code: 92-52Site Register Issue: Interim cleanup reportType of Report Ecology Received: North WesternRegion: TankWaste Management: Groundwater, SoilMedia Contaminated: Petroleum productsContaminants Found at Site: 03/29/93Date Ecology Received Report: CONOCOPHILLIPS 2705509 (Continued) 1000659047 TC2826208.2s Page 66 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation Not reportedReport Title: Not reportedContact: 17County Code: 94-50Site Register Issue: Final cleanup reportType of Report Ecology Received: North WesternRegion: TankWaste Management: Groundwater, SoilMedia Contaminated: Petroleum productsContaminants Found at Site: 07/09/96Date Ecology Received Report: Not reportedReport Title: Not reportedContact: 17County Code: 92-11Site Register Issue: Interim cleanup reportType of Report Ecology Received: North WesternRegion: TankWaste Management: SoilMedia Contaminated: Petroleum productsContaminants Found at Site: 11/12/91Date Ecology Received Report: Not reportedReport Title: Not reportedContact: 17County Code: 94-15Site Register Issue: Final cleanup reportType of Report Ecology Received: North WesternRegion: TankWaste Management: Groundwater, SoilMedia Contaminated: Petroleum productsContaminants Found at Site: 04/12/95Date Ecology Received Report: Not reportedReport Title: Not reportedContact: 17County Code: 94-15Site Register Issue: Final cleanup reportType of Report Ecology Received: North WesternRegion: TankWaste Management: Groundwater, SoilMedia Contaminated: CONOCOPHILLIPS 2705509 (Continued) 1000659047 Gasoline StationsType: 1977Year: HIGHLANDS TEXACOName: EDR Historical Auto Stations: 1073 ft. Site 2 of 2 in cluster E 0.203 mi. Relative: Higher Actual: 364 ft. 1/8-1/4 RENTON, WA NE 3005 NE SUNSET BLVD N/A E18 EDR Historical Auto StationsHIGHLANDS TEXACO 1009615318 TC2826208.2s Page 67 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation No violations foundViolation Status: Commercial status unknownOff-site waste receiver: NoUsed oil transporter: NoUsed oil transfer facility: NoUsed oil Specification marketer: NoUsed oil fuel marketer to burner: NoUser oil refiner: NoUsed oil processor: NoUsed oil fuel burner: NoFurnace exemption: NoOn-site burner exemption: NoUnderground injection activity: NoTreater, storer or disposer of HW: NoTransporter of hazardous waste: NoRecycler of hazardous waste: NoMixed waste (haz. and radioactive): NoU.S. importer of hazardous waste: Handler Activities Summary: Not reportedOwner/Op end date: 12/31/2001Owner/Op start date: OperatorOwner/Operator Type: PrivateLegal status: Not reportedOwner/operator telephone: USOwner/operator country: SEATTLE, WA 98112 2256 38TH PLACE EOwner/operator address: RICHARD SENSENEYOwner/operator name: Owner/Operator Summary: hazardous waste at any time waste during any calendar month, and accumulates more than 1000 kg of hazardous waste at any time; or generates 100 kg or less of hazardous waste during any calendar month and accumulates less than 6000 kg of Handler: generates more than 100 and less than 1000 kg of hazardousDescription: Small Small Quantity GeneratorClassification: 10EPA Region: Not reportedContact email: (206)322-1381Contact telephone: USContact country: SEATTLE, WA 98112 2256 38TH PLACE EContact address: RICHARD SENSENEYContact: SEATTLE, WA 98112 2256 38TH PLACE EMailing address: WAH000031757EPA ID: RENTON, WA 98056 936 HARRINGTON AVE NEFacility address: COLPETTS DEVELOPMENTFacility name: 08/30/2007Date form received by agency: RCRA-SQG: 1127 ft. Site 2 of 3 in cluster D 0.213 mi. Relative: Lower Actual: 315 ft. 1/8-1/4 RENTON, WA 98056 South 936 HARRINGTON AVE NE WAH000031757 D19 RCRA-SQGCOLPETTS DEVELOPMENT 1010788379 TC2826208.2s Page 68 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation Not reportedInteraction End Date: 8/30/2007Interaction Start Date: WAH000031757Federal Program Indentifier: AInteraction Status: Hazardous Waste GeneratorInteraction (Aka Env Int) Description: HWGInteraction (Aka Env Int) Type Code: 9077381Geographic Location Identifier (Alias Facid): Not reportedLocation Verified Code: 8Coordinate Point Geographic Position Code: 99Horizontal Accuracy Code: 99Coordinate Point Areal Extent Code: -122.1788Longitude Decimal Degrees: 47.499429999999997Latitude Decimal Degrees: Colpetts DevelopmentFacility Name: 9077381Geographic location identifier (alias facid): -122.1788Longitude: 47.499429999999997Latitude: 9077381Facility Id: ALLSITES: corrective action activities required under RCRA. program staff to track the notification, permit, compliance, and and treat, store, or dispose of hazardous waste. RCRAInfo allows RCRA events and activities related to facilities that generate, transport, Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) program through the tracking of RCRAInfo is a national information system that supports the Resource Environmental Interest/Information System 110035443455Registry ID: FINDS: 1127 ft. Site 3 of 3 in cluster D 0.213 mi. Relative: Lower Actual: 315 ft. 1/8-1/4 RENTON, WA 98056 South ALLSITES936 HARRINGTON AVE NE N/A D20 FINDSCOLPETTS DEVELOPMENT 1011399816 Cleaners And DyersType: 1991Year: SPARKLE DRY CLEANING AND LAUNDROMAT BETTY ALTONName: EDR Historical Cleaners: 1212 ft. 0.229 mi. Relative: Lower Actual: 314 ft. 1/8-1/4 RENTON, WA South 927 HARRINGTON AVE NE N/A 21 EDR Historical CleanersSPARKLE DRY CLEANING AND LAUNDROMAT BETTY ALTON 1009613474 TC2826208.2s Page 69 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation Double Wall PipePipe Construction: Flexible PipingPipe Material: Corrosion ResistantTank Corrosion Protection: AnnualTank Tightness Test: Double Wall TankTank Construction: Steel Clad with Corrosion Resistant CompositeTank Material: Ball Float Valve (vent line)Tank Overfill Prevention: Spill Bucket/Spill BoxTank Spill Prevention: Pressurized SystemTank Pumping System: 1/1/0001Tank Closure Date: 4/30/2011Tank Permit Expiration Date: OperationalTank Status: 1/1/0001TankSystem Status Change Date: OperationalTankSystem Status: 6/15/1999Tank Upgrade Date: Not reportedCapacity: 6/15/1999Install Date: 1Tank Name: 503646Tank ID: 4252281825Phone Number: 6016199940010001UBI: 14.9964000000091Long Sec: 11Long Min: -122Long Deg: 2.02679999999873Lat Sec: 30Lat Min: 47Lat Deg: 503611Site ID: 43675956Facility ID: UST: Not reportedInteraction End Date: 6/15/1999Interaction Start Date: 503611Federal Program Indentifier: AInteraction Status: Underground Storage TankInteraction (Aka Env Int) Description: USTInteraction (Aka Env Int) Type Code: 43675956Geographic Location Identifier (Alias Facid): NLocation Verified Code: 5Coordinate Point Geographic Position Code: 6Horizontal Accuracy Code: 4Coordinate Point Areal Extent Code: -122.187499Longitude Decimal Degrees: 47.500563Latitude Decimal Degrees: FRIENDLY FUELS INC RENTONFacility Name: 43675956Geographic location identifier (alias facid): -122.187499Longitude: 47.500563Latitude: 43675956Facility Id: ALLSITES: 1396 ft. 0.264 mi. Relative: Lower Actual: 265 ft. 1/4-1/2 RENTON, WA 98056 WNW UST1190 SUNSET BLVD NE STE F N/A 22 ALLSITESFRIENDLY FUELS INC RENTON U003604980 TC2826208.2s Page 70 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation A4990Tag Number: 12/10/1999Tank Actual Status Date: Every 3 Years (suction tank check valve)Pipe Tightness Test: Not reportedTank Second Release Detection: Automatic Tank GaugingTank Primary Release Detection: Corrosion ResistantPipe Corrosion Protection: Not reportedPipe Second Release Detection: Automatic Line Leak DetectionPipe Primary Release Detection: Double Wall PipePipe Construction: Flexible PipingPipe Material: Corrosion ResistantTank Corrosion Protection: AnnualTank Tightness Test: Double Wall TankTank Construction: Steel Clad with Corrosion Resistant CompositeTank Material: Ball Float Valve (vent line)Tank Overfill Prevention: Spill Bucket/Spill BoxTank Spill Prevention: Pressurized SystemTank Pumping System: 1/1/0001Tank Closure Date: 4/30/2011Tank Permit Expiration Date: OperationalTank Status: 1/1/0001TankSystem Status Change Date: OperationalTankSystem Status: 6/15/1999Tank Upgrade Date: Not reportedCapacity: 6/15/1999Install Date: 2Tank Name: 503647Tank ID: A4990Tag Number: 12/10/1999Tank Actual Status Date: Every 3 Years (suction tank check valve)Pipe Tightness Test: Not reportedTank Second Release Detection: Automatic Tank GaugingTank Primary Release Detection: Corrosion ResistantPipe Corrosion Protection: Not reportedPipe Second Release Detection: Automatic Line Leak DetectionPipe Primary Release Detection: FRIENDLY FUELS INC RENTON (Continued) U003604980 27921777Geographic Location Identifier (Alias Facid): NLocation Verified Code: 5Coordinate Point Geographic Position Code: 6Horizontal Accuracy Code: 4Coordinate Point Areal Extent Code: -122.18297200000001Longitude Decimal Degrees: 47.497402000000001Latitude Decimal Degrees: RENTON FIRE STATION 12Facility Name: 27921777Geographic location identifier (alias facid): -122.18297200000001Longitude: 47.497402000000001Latitude: 27921777Facility Id: ALLSITES: 1423 ft. 0.270 mi. Relative: Lower Actual: 309 ft. 1/4-1/2 RENTON, WA 98056 South UST901 HARRINGTON AVE NE N/A 23 ALLSITESRENTON FIRE STATION 12 U004040801 TC2826208.2s Page 71 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation RemovedTank Status: 8/26/1996TankSystem Status Change Date: RemovedTankSystem Status: 1/1/0001Tank Upgrade Date: Not reportedCapacity: 12/31/1964Install Date: 2Tank Name: 21559Tank ID: Not reportedTag Number: 8/6/1996Tank Actual Status Date: Not reportedPipe Tightness Test: Not reportedTank Second Release Detection: Not reportedTank Primary Release Detection: Not reportedPipe Corrosion Protection: Not reportedPipe Second Release Detection: Not reportedPipe Primary Release Detection: Not reportedPipe Construction: SteelPipe Material: Not reportedTank Corrosion Protection: Not reportedTank Tightness Test: Single Wall TankTank Construction: SteelTank Material: Not reportedTank Overfill Prevention: Not reportedTank Spill Prevention: Not reportedTank Pumping System: 1/1/0001Tank Closure Date: 1/1/0001Tank Permit Expiration Date: RemovedTank Status: 8/26/1996TankSystem Status Change Date: RemovedTankSystem Status: 1/1/0001Tank Upgrade Date: Not reportedCapacity: 12/31/1964Install Date: 1Tank Name: 21414Tank ID: 2062352525Phone Number: Not reportedUBI: 58.6992000000237Long Sec: 10Long Min: -122Long Deg: 50.6472000000036Lat Sec: 29Lat Min: 47Lat Deg: 4790Site ID: 27921777Facility ID: UST: 5/3/2000Interaction End Date: 2/29/2000Interaction Start Date: 4790Federal Program Indentifier: IInteraction Status: Underground Storage TankInteraction (Aka Env Int) Description: USTInteraction (Aka Env Int) Type Code: RENTON FIRE STATION 12 (Continued) U004040801 TC2826208.2s Page 72 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation Not reportedTag Number: 8/6/1996Tank Actual Status Date: Not reportedPipe Tightness Test: Not reportedTank Second Release Detection: Not reportedTank Primary Release Detection: Not reportedPipe Corrosion Protection: Not reportedPipe Second Release Detection: Not reportedPipe Primary Release Detection: Not reportedPipe Construction: SteelPipe Material: Not reportedTank Corrosion Protection: Not reportedTank Tightness Test: Single Wall TankTank Construction: SteelTank Material: Not reportedTank Overfill Prevention: Not reportedTank Spill Prevention: Not reportedTank Pumping System: 1/1/0001Tank Closure Date: 1/1/0001Tank Permit Expiration Date: RENTON FIRE STATION 12 (Continued) U004040801 36.3936000000137Long Sec: 10Long Min: -122Long Deg: 16.3188000000076Lat Sec: 30Lat Min: 47Lat Deg: 511357Site ID: 3943952Facility ID: UST: 5/18/2000Interaction End Date: 9/8/1999Interaction Start Date: 511357Federal Program Indentifier: IInteraction Status: Underground Storage TankInteraction (Aka Env Int) Description: USTInteraction (Aka Env Int) Type Code: 3943952Geographic Location Identifier (Alias Facid): NLocation Verified Code: 5Coordinate Point Geographic Position Code: 6Horizontal Accuracy Code: 4Coordinate Point Areal Extent Code: -122.176776Longitude Decimal Degrees: 47.504533000000002Latitude Decimal Degrees: RITE AID STORE 5203Facility Name: 3943952Geographic location identifier (alias facid): -122.176776Longitude: 47.504533000000002Latitude: 3943952Facility Id: ALLSITES: 1625 ft. Site 1 of 3 in cluster F 0.308 mi. Relative: Higher Actual: 372 ft. 1/4-1/2 RENTON, WA 98056 NE UST3116 NE SUNSET BLVD N/A F24 ALLSITESRITE AID STORE 5203 U003665933 TC2826208.2s Page 73 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation Not reportedTag Number: 12/10/1999Tank Actual Status Date: Not reportedPipe Tightness Test: Not reportedTank Second Release Detection: Not reportedTank Primary Release Detection: Not reportedPipe Corrosion Protection: Not reportedPipe Second Release Detection: Not reportedPipe Primary Release Detection: Not reportedPipe Construction: Not reportedPipe Material: Not reportedTank Corrosion Protection: Not reportedTank Tightness Test: Not reportedTank Construction: Not reportedTank Material: Not reportedTank Overfill Prevention: Not reportedTank Spill Prevention: Not reportedTank Pumping System: 1/1/0001Tank Closure Date: 1/1/0001Tank Permit Expiration Date: RemovedTank Status: 9/17/1999TankSystem Status Change Date: RemovedTankSystem Status: 1/1/0001Tank Upgrade Date: Not reportedCapacity: 1/1/1900Install Date: UST#2Tank Name: 511359Tank ID: Not reportedPhone Number: Not reportedUBI: RITE AID STORE 5203 (Continued)U003665933 1/25/1996Interaction End Date: 12/15/1989Interaction Start Date: 8764Federal Program Indentifier: IInteraction Status: LUST FacilityInteraction (Aka Env Int) Description: LUSTInteraction (Aka Env Int) Type Code: 2559Geographic Location Identifier (Alias Facid): NLocation Verified Code: 5Coordinate Point Geographic Position Code: 6Horizontal Accuracy Code: 4Coordinate Point Areal Extent Code: -122.176682Longitude Decimal Degrees: 47.504491999999999Latitude Decimal Degrees: ARCO STATION 4400Facility Name: 2559Geographic location identifier (alias facid): -122.176682Longitude: 47.504491999999999Latitude: 2559Facility Id: ALLSITES: 1665 ft. Site 2 of 3 in cluster F 0.315 mi. Relative: Higher Actual: 373 ft. 1/4-1/2 RENTON, WA NE CSCSL NFA3123 NW SUNSET BLVD N/A F25 ALLSITESARCO STATION 4400 S104971552 TC2826208.2s Page 74 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation Not reportedVCP: Not reportedRank: 9/6/1995NFA Date: NFA after assessment, IRAP, or VCPNFA Type: 2559Facility/Site Id: CSCSL NFA: 9/6/1995Interaction End Date: 9/6/1995Interaction Start Date: Not reportedFederal Program Indentifier: IInteraction Status: Independent Remedial Actn PrgInteraction (Aka Env Int) Description: IRAPInteraction (Aka Env Int) Type Code: 2559Geographic Location Identifier (Alias Facid): 7/4/1776Interaction End Date: 1/1/1988Interaction Start Date: CRK000000680Federal Program Indentifier: IInteraction Status: Emergency/Haz Chem Rpt TIER2Interaction (Aka Env Int) Description: TIER2Interaction (Aka Env Int) Type Code: 2559Geographic Location Identifier (Alias Facid): Not reportedInteraction End Date: 3/20/2000Interaction Start Date: 8764Federal Program Indentifier: AInteraction Status: Underground Storage TankInteraction (Aka Env Int) Description: USTInteraction (Aka Env Int) Type Code: 2559Geographic Location Identifier (Alias Facid): ARCO STATION 4400 (Continued)S104971552 92-28Site Register Issue: Interim cleanup reportType of Report Ecology Received: North WesternRegion: TankWaste Management: SoilMedia Contaminated: Petroleum productsContaminants Found at Site: 07/06/92Date Ecology Received Report: Not reportedReport Title: Not reportedContact: 17County Code: 92-06Site Register Issue: Interim cleanup reportType of Report Ecology Received: North WesternRegion: TankWaste Management: SoilMedia Contaminated: Petroleum productsContaminants Found at Site: 09/05/91Date Ecology Received Report: ICR: 1665 ft. Site 3 of 3 in cluster F 0.315 mi. Relative: Higher Actual: 373 ft. 1/4-1/2 NEWCASTLE, WA 98056 NE 3123 NE SUNSET BLVD. N/A F26 ICRARCO #4400 S104873044 TC2826208.2s Page 75 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation Not reportedReport Title: Not reportedContact: 17County Code: 94-19Site Register Issue: Interim cleanup reportType of Report Ecology Received: North WesternRegion: TankWaste Management: SoilMedia Contaminated: Petroleum productsContaminants Found at Site: 03/22/95Date Ecology Received Report: Not reportedReport Title: Not reportedContact: 17County Code: ARCO #4400 (Continued)S104873044 5/3/2000Interaction End Date: 1/1/1973Interaction Start Date: 3033Federal Program Indentifier: IInteraction Status: Underground Storage TankInteraction (Aka Env Int) Description: USTInteraction (Aka Env Int) Type Code: 75569533Geographic Location Identifier (Alias Facid): NLocation Verified Code: 5Coordinate Point Geographic Position Code: 6Horizontal Accuracy Code: 4Coordinate Point Areal Extent Code: -122.188812Longitude Decimal Degrees: 47.501102000000003Latitude Decimal Degrees: MIKE POTOSHNIK JRFacility Name: 75569533Geographic location identifier (alias facid): -122.188812Longitude: 47.501102000000003Latitude: 75569533Facility Id: ALLSITES: Quality Programs. Quality, Dam Safety, Hazardous Waste, Toxics Cleanup, and Water facility/site that is currently, or has been, of interest to the Air Department of Ecology. This system contains key information for each means to query and display data maintained by the Washington Washington Facility / Site Identification System (WA-FSIS) provides a Environmental Interest/Information System 110015422194Registry ID: FINDS: 1853 ft. 0.351 mi. Relative: Lower Actual: 256 ft. 1/4-1/2 RENTON, WA 98056 West ALLSITES1105 SUNSET BLVD NE N/A 27 FINDSMIKE POTOSHNIK JR 1007065647 TC2826208.2s Page 76 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation NoUser oil refiner: NoUsed oil processor: NoUsed oil fuel burner: NoFurnace exemption: NoOn-site burner exemption: NoUnderground injection activity: NoTreater, storer or disposer of HW: NoTransporter of hazardous waste: NoRecycler of hazardous waste: NoMixed waste (haz. and radioactive): NoU.S. importer of hazardous waste: Handler Activities Summary: Not reportedOwner/Op end date: 02/18/1996Owner/Op start date: OperatorOwner/Operator Type: PrivateLegal status: Not reportedOwner/operator telephone: USOwner/operator country: REDMOND, WA 98053 10115 214TH AVE NEOwner/operator address: HELEN FERRELLIOwner/operator name: Owner/Operator Summary: 100 kg of that material at any time hazardous waste during any calendar month, and accumulates more than from the cleanup of a spill, into or on any land or water, of acutely of any residue or contaminated soil, waste or other debris resulting kg of acutely hazardous waste at any time; or generates 100 kg or less hazardous waste during any calendar month, and accumulates more than 1 waste during any calendar month; or generates 1 kg or less of acutely cleanup of a spill, into or on any land or water, of acutely hazardous residue or contaminated soil, waste or other debris resulting from the during any calendar month; or generates more than 100 kg of any calendar month; or generates more than 1 kg of acutely hazardous waste Handler: generates 1,000 kg or more of hazardous waste during anyDescription: Large Quantity GeneratorClassification: 10EPA Region: Not reportedContact email: (425)868-8528Contact telephone: USContact country: REDMOND, WA 98053 10115 214TH AVE NEContact address: HELEN FERRELLIContact: REDMOND, WA 98053 10115 214TH AVE NEMailing address: WAH000005173EPA ID: RENTON, WA 98056 3155 NE SUNSET BLVDFacility address: DANIELS DRYCLEANERS SUNSET BLVDFacility name: 03/15/2006Date form received by agency: RCRA-LQG: 1892 ft.Inactive DrycleanersSite 1 of 2 in cluster G 0.358 mi.MANIFEST Relative: Higher Actual: 382 ft. 1/4-1/2 ALLSITESRENTON, WA 98056 NE FINDS3155 NE SUNSET BLVD WAH000005173 G28 RCRA-LQGDANIELS DRYCLEANERS SUNSET BLVD 1001234105 TC2826208.2s Page 77 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation 12/31/2005Interaction End Date: 5/11/1998Interaction Start Date: WAH000005173Federal Program Indentifier: IInteraction Status: Hazardous Waste GeneratorInteraction (Aka Env Int) Description: HWGInteraction (Aka Env Int) Type Code: 99651338Geographic Location Identifier (Alias Facid): NLocation Verified Code: 8Coordinate Point Geographic Position Code: 99Horizontal Accuracy Code: 99Coordinate Point Areal Extent Code: -122.18473237000001Longitude Decimal Degrees: 47.499152240000001Latitude Decimal Degrees: Daniels Drycleaners Sunset BlvdFacility Name: 99651338Geographic location identifier (alias facid): -122.184732375514Longitude: 47.499152247015701Latitude: 99651338Facility Id: ALLSITES: corrective action activities required under RCRA. program staff to track the notification, permit, compliance, and and treat, store, or dispose of hazardous waste. RCRAInfo allows RCRA events and activities related to facilities that generate, transport, Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) program through the tracking of RCRAInfo is a national information system that supports the Resource Quality Programs. Quality, Dam Safety, Hazardous Waste, Toxics Cleanup, and Water facility/site that is currently, or has been, of interest to the Air Department of Ecology. This system contains key information for each means to query and display data maintained by the Washington Washington Facility / Site Identification System (WA-FSIS) provides a Environmental Interest/Information System 110005392743Registry ID: FINDS: No violations foundViolation Status: Small Quantity GeneratorClassification: DANIELS DRYCLEANERS SUNSET BLVDFacility name: 12/31/2003Date form received by agency: Large Quantity GeneratorClassification: DANIELS DRYCLEANERS SUNSET BLVDFacility name: 12/31/2005Date form received by agency: Historical Generators: Commercial status unknownOff-site waste receiver: NoUsed oil transporter: NoUsed oil transfer facility: NoUsed oil Specification marketer: NoUsed oil fuel marketer to burner: DANIELS DRYCLEANERS SUNSET BLVD (Continued) 1001234105 TC2826208.2s Page 78 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation 10115 214th Ave NELEGAL ADDR LINE1: PrivateLEGAL ORG TYPE: Not reportedLEGAL ORG NAME: UNITED STATESMAIL COUNTRY: Redmond, WA 98053MAIL CITY,ST,ZIP: 10115 214th Ave NEMAIL ADDR LINE1: Daniels DrycleanersMAIL NAME: drycleaningBUSINESS TYPE: 81232NAICS CD: 600550005TAX REG NBR: Not reportedFacility Address 2: WAH000005173EPA ID: NoOff-specification used oil burner - industrial furnace: NoOff-specification used oil burner - industrial boiler: NoOff-specification used oil burner - utility boiler: NoDestination Facility for Universal Waste: NoUniversal waste - lamps - accumulate: NoUniversal waste - mercury - accumulate: NoUniversal waste - thermostats - accumulate: NoUniversal waste - batteries - accumulate: NoUniversal waste - lamps - generate: NoUniversal waste - mercury - generate: NoUniversal waste - thermostats - generate: NoUniversal waste - batteries - generate: NoSmelter defferal: NoIndustrial Furnace: NoIndustry boiler burner: NoUtility boiler burner: No"Other marketers (i.e., blender, distributor, etc.)": NoGenerator marketing to burner: NoGenerator of dangerous fuel waste: NoTreatment/Storage/Disposal/Recycling Facility: NoImmediate recycler: NoImporter of hazardous waste: NoMixed radioactive waste: NoTreatment by Generator: NoPermit by Rule: Not reportedData Year: filters not usesd up. not sludge but clean chemical that was pumped out. And 270 lbs of chemical to be disposed. *Please Note* 2445lbs of perchlorethylene was fire. The bad new was the we had to pay thousands of dollars for the by a roofer. The good news was that all the chemicals surivived the On June 16th 2006 at 12:30PM our business burned down it was startedForm Comm: Not reportedFWC Desc: Not reportedSWC Desc: 99651338Facility Site ID Number: WA MANIFEST: 9/6/2006Interaction End Date: 1/1/2002Interaction Start Date: WAH000005173Federal Program Indentifier: IInteraction Status: Hazardous Waste PlannerInteraction (Aka Env Int) Description: HWPInteraction (Aka Env Int) Type Code: 99651338Geographic Location Identifier (Alias Facid): DANIELS DRYCLEANERS SUNSET BLVD (Continued) 1001234105 TC2826208.2s Page 79 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation Daniels DrycleanersMAIL NAME: drycleaningBUSINESS TYPE: 600550005TAX REG NBR: Not reportedState Waste Code Desc: Not reportedFed Waste Code Desc: 81232NAICS Code: WAH000005173Facility ID: 99651338FS Id: WAH000005173EPA I: Inactive Drycleaners: NoUSED OIL FUEL MRKTR MEETS SPECS: NoUSED OIL FUEL MRKTR DIRECTS SHPMNTS: NoUSED OIL REREFINER: NoUSED OIL PROCESSOR: NoUSED OIL TRANSFER FACLTY: NoUSED OIL TRANSPORTER: NoUW BATTERY GEN: Not reportedOTHER EXEMPTION: NoTRANSFER FACILITY: NoRECYCLER ONSITE: NoTRANSPORTS OTHRS WASTE: NoTRANSPORTS OWN WASTE: NoONE TIME GENERATION: NoBATCH GENERATION: YesMONTHLY GENERATION: LQGGEN STATUS CD: danieljandhelenj@comcast.netFORM CONTACT EMAIL: (425)868-8528FORM CONTACT PHONE NBR: UNITED STATESFORM CONTACT COUNTRY: Redmond, WA 98053FORM CONTACT CITY,ST,ZIP: 10115 214th Ave NEFORM CONTACT ADDR LINE1: Helen FerrelliFORM CONTACT NAME: danieljandhelenj@comcast.netSITE CONTACT EMAIL: (425)868-8528SITE CONTACT PHONE NBR: UNITED STATESSITE CONTACT COUNTRY: Redmond, WA 98053SITE CONTACT ZIP: 10115 214th Ave NESITE CONTACT ADDR LINE1: Helen FerrelliSITE CONTACT NAME: 2/18/1996OPERATOR EFFECTIVE DATE: (425)868-8528OPERATOR PHONE NBR: UNITED STATESOPERATOR COUNTRY: Redmond, WA 98053OPERATOR CITY,ST,ZIP: 10115 214th Ave NEOPERATOR ADDR LINE1: PrivateOPERATOR ORG TYPE: Not reportedOPERATOR ORG NAME: (425)868-8528LAND PHONE NBR: UNITED STATESLAND COUNTRY: REDMOND, WA 98053LAND CITY,ST,ZIP: 10115 214th Ave NELAND ADDR LINE1: Daniel & Helen FerrelliLAND PERSON NAME: PrivateLAND ORG TYPE: Not reportedLAND ORG NAME: 2/18/1986LEGAL EFFECTIVE DATE: (425)868-8528LEGAL PHONE NBR: UNITED STATESLEGAL COUNTRY: REDMOND, WA 98053LEGAL CITY,ST,ZIP: DANIELS DRYCLEANERS SUNSET BLVD (Continued) 1001234105 TC2826208.2s Page 80 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation Not reportedFORM CONTACT MIDDLE INIT: HelenFORM CONTACT FIRST NAME: danieljandhelenj@comcast.netSITE CONTACT EMAIL: (425)868-8528SITE CONTACT PHONE NBR: UNITED STATESSITE CONTACT COUNTRY: 98053SITE CONTACT ZIP: WASITE CONTACT STATE: RedmondSITE CONTACT CITY: Not reportedSITE CONTACT LINE2: 10115 214th Ave NESITE CONTACT LINE1: FerrelliSITE CONTACT LAST NAME: Not reportedSITE CONTACT MIDDLE INIT: HelenSITE CONTACT FIRST NAME: PrivateOPERATOR ORGANIZATION TYPE: 2/18/1996OPERATOR EFFECTIVE DATE: (425)868-8528OPERATOR PHONE NBR: UNITED STATESOPERATOR COUNTRY: 98053OPERATOR ZIP: WAOPERATOR STATE: RedmondOPERATOR CITY: Not reportedOPERATOR LINE2: 10115 214th Ave NEOPERATOR LINE1: FerrelliOPERATOR PERSON LAST NAME: Not reportedOPERATOR PERSON MIDDLE INIT: HelenOPERATOR PERSON FIRST NAME: Not reportedOPERATOR ORG NAME: PrivateLAND ORGANIZATION TYPE: (425)868-8528LAND PHONE NBR: UNITED STATESLAND COUNTRY: 98053LAND ZIP: WALAND STATE: REDMONDLAND CITY: Not reportedLAND LINE2: 10115 214th Ave NELAND LINE1: FerrelliLAND PERSON LAST NAME: Not reportedLAND PERSON MIDDLE INIT: Daniel &LAND PERSON FIRST NAME: Not reportedLAND ORG NAME: PrivateLEGAL ORGANIZATION TYPE: 2/18/1986LEGAL EFFECTIVE DATE: (425)868-8528LEGAL PHONE NBR: UNITED STATESLEGAL COUNTRY: 98053LEGAL ZIP: WALEGAL STATE: REDMONDLEGAL CITY: Not reportedLEGAL LINE2: 10115 214th Ave NELEGAL LINE1: FerrelliLEGAL PERSON LAST NAME: Not reportedLEGAL PERSON MIDDLE INIT: Daniel &LEGAL PERSON FIRST NAME: Not reportedLEGAL ORG NAME: UNITED STATESMAIL COUNTRY: 98053MAIL ZIP: WAMAIL STATE: RedmondMAIL CITY: Not reportedMAIL LINE2: 10115 214th Ave NEMAIL LINE1: DANIELS DRYCLEANERS SUNSET BLVD (Continued) 1001234105 TC2826208.2s Page 81 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation Not reportedComments: NoUSED OIL FUEL MARKETER MEETS SPECS: NoUSED OIL FUEL MARKETER DIR SHIPMENTS: NoUSED OIL REREFINER: NoUSED OIL PROCESSOR: Not reportedUSED OIL TRANSFER FACILITY: NoUSED OIL TRANSPORTER: NoOFF SPEC FURNACE: NoOFF SPEC INDUSTRY BOILER: NoOFF SPEC UTILITY BOILER: NoUW DESTINATION FACILITY: NoUW LAMPS ACCUM: NoUW MERCURY ACCUM: NoUW THERMOSTATS ACCUM: NoUW BATTERY ACCUM: NoUW LAMPS GEN: NoUW MERCURY GEN: NoUW THERMOSTATS GEN: NoUW BATTERY GEN: Not reportedOTHER EXEMPTION: Not reportedSMALL QTY EXEMPTION: NoSMELTER DEFERRAL: NoFURNACE BURNER: NoINDUSTRY BOILER BURNER: NoUTILITY BOILER BURNER: NoGEN OTHER MARKETERS: NoGEN MARKET TO BURNER: NoGEN DANG FUEL: NoIMMEDIATE RECYCLER: NoTSDR FACILITY: NoIMPORTER: NoMIXED RADIOACTIVE: NoTBG: NoPBR: NoTRANSFER FACILITY: NoRECYCLER ONSITE: NoTRANSPORTS OTHERS WASTE: NoTRANSPORTS OWN WASTE: NoONE TIME GENERATION: NoBATCH GENERATION: YesMONTHLY GENERATION: LQGGEN STATUS CD: danieljandhelenj@comcast.netFORM CONTACT EMAIL: (425)868-8528FORM CONTACT PHONE NBR: UNITED STATESFORM CONTACT COUNTRY: 98053FORM CONTACT ZIP: WAFORM CONTACT STATE: RedmondFORM CONTACT CITY: Not reportedFORM CONTACT LINE2: 10115 214th Ave NEFORM CONTACT LINE1: FerrelliFORM CONTACT LAST NAME: DANIELS DRYCLEANERS SUNSET BLVD (Continued) 1001234105 TC2826208.2s Page 82 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation NoUsed oil fuel burner: NoFurnace exemption: NoOn-site burner exemption: NoUnderground injection activity: NoTreater, storer or disposer of HW: NoTransporter of hazardous waste: NoRecycler of hazardous waste: NoMixed waste (haz. and radioactive): NoU.S. importer of hazardous waste: Handler Activities Summary: Not reportedOwner/Op end date: 02/23/1996Owner/Op start date: OperatorOwner/Operator Type: PrivateLegal status: Not reportedOwner/operator telephone: USOwner/operator country: RENTON, WA 98056 3164 NE SUNSET BLVDOwner/operator address: IL SUNG JUNOwner/operator name: Owner/Operator Summary: hazardous waste the cleanup of a spill, into or on any land or water, of acutely any residue or contaminated soil, waste or other debris resulting from time: 1 kg or less of acutely hazardous waste; or 100 kg or less of hazardous waste during any calendar month, and accumulates at any from the cleanup of a spill, into or on any land or water, of acutely of any residue or contaminated soil, waste or other debris resulting land or water, of acutely hazardous waste; or generates 100 kg or less other debris resulting from the cleanup of a spill, into or on any waste; or 100 kg or less of any residue or contaminated soil, waste or month, and accumulates at any time: 1 kg or less of acutely hazardous or generates 1 kg or less of acutely hazardous waste per calendar month, and accumulates 1000 kg or less of hazardous waste at any time; Handler: generates 100 kg or less of hazardous waste per calendarDescription: Conditionally Exempt Small Quantity GeneratorClassification: 10EPA Region: Not reportedContact email: (425)271-9380Contact telephone: USContact country: RENTON, WA 98056-3337 3164 NE SUNSET BLVDContact address: IL SUNG JUNContact: RENTON, WA 98056-3337 3164 NE SUNSET BLVDMailing address: WAD980984322EPA ID: RENTON, WA 98056 3164 SUNSET BLVD NEFacility address: BUSY BEE CLEANERSFacility name: 02/23/1996Date form received by agency: RCRA-CESQG: 1962 ft. Site 2 of 2 in cluster G 0.372 mi.Inactive Drycleaners Relative: Higher Actual: 383 ft. 1/4-1/2 ALLSITESRENTON, WA 98056 NE FINDS3164 SUNSET BLVD NE WAD980984322 G29 RCRA-CESQGBUSY BEE CLEANERS 1001490399 TC2826208.2s Page 83 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation 12/31/1994Interaction End Date: 7/11/1986Interaction Start Date: WAD980984322Federal Program Indentifier: IInteraction Status: Hazardous Waste GeneratorInteraction (Aka Env Int) Description: HWGInteraction (Aka Env Int) Type Code: 31853355Geographic Location Identifier (Alias Facid): NLocation Verified Code: 99Coordinate Point Geographic Position Code: 99Horizontal Accuracy Code: 99Coordinate Point Areal Extent Code: -122.17541Longitude Decimal Degrees: 47.504739999999998Latitude Decimal Degrees: Busy Bee CleanersFacility Name: 31853355Geographic location identifier (alias facid): -122.17541Longitude: 47.504739999999998Latitude: 31853355Facility Id: ALLSITES: corrective action activities required under RCRA. program staff to track the notification, permit, compliance, and and treat, store, or dispose of hazardous waste. RCRAInfo allows RCRA events and activities related to facilities that generate, transport, Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) program through the tracking of RCRAInfo is a national information system that supports the Resource Quality Programs. Quality, Dam Safety, Hazardous Waste, Toxics Cleanup, and Water facility/site that is currently, or has been, of interest to the Air Department of Ecology. This system contains key information for each means to query and display data maintained by the Washington Washington Facility / Site Identification System (WA-FSIS) provides a Environmental Interest/Information System 110005338508Registry ID: FINDS: No violations foundViolation Status: Large Quantity GeneratorClassification: BUSY BEE CLEANERSFacility name: 09/01/1993Date form received by agency: Historical Generators: Commercial status unknownOff-site waste receiver: NoUsed oil transporter: NoUsed oil transfer facility: NoUsed oil Specification marketer: NoUsed oil fuel marketer to burner: NoUser oil refiner: NoUsed oil processor: BUSY BEE CLEANERS (Continued)1001490399 TC2826208.2s Page 84 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation Not reportedSITE CONTACT LAST NAME: Not reportedSITE CONTACT MIDDLE INIT: Not reportedSITE CONTACT FIRST NAME: Not reportedOPERATOR ORGANIZATION TYPE: Not reportedOPERATOR EFFECTIVE DATE: Not reportedOPERATOR PHONE NBR: Not reportedOPERATOR COUNTRY: Not reportedOPERATOR ZIP: Not reportedOPERATOR STATE: Not reportedOPERATOR CITY: Not reportedOPERATOR LINE2: Not reportedOPERATOR LINE1: Not reportedOPERATOR PERSON LAST NAME: Not reportedOPERATOR PERSON MIDDLE INIT: Not reportedOPERATOR PERSON FIRST NAME: Not reportedOPERATOR ORG NAME: Not reportedLAND ORGANIZATION TYPE: Not reportedLAND PHONE NBR: Not reportedLAND COUNTRY: Not reportedLAND ZIP: Not reportedLAND STATE: Not reportedLAND CITY: Not reportedLAND LINE2: Not reportedLAND LINE1: Not reportedLAND PERSON LAST NAME: Not reportedLAND PERSON MIDDLE INIT: Not reportedLAND PERSON FIRST NAME: Not reportedLAND ORG NAME: Not reportedLEGAL ORGANIZATION TYPE: Not reportedLEGAL EFFECTIVE DATE: Not reportedLEGAL PHONE NBR: Not reportedLEGAL COUNTRY: Not reportedLEGAL ZIP: Not reportedLEGAL STATE: Not reportedLEGAL CITY: Not reportedLEGAL LINE2: Not reportedLEGAL LINE1: Not reportedLEGAL PERSON LAST NAME: Not reportedLEGAL PERSON MIDDLE INIT: Not reportedLEGAL PERSON FIRST NAME: Not reportedLEGAL ORG NAME: Not reportedMAIL COUNTRY: Not reportedMAIL ZIP: Not reportedMAIL STATE: Not reportedMAIL CITY: Not reportedMAIL LINE2: Not reportedMAIL LINE1: Not reportedMAIL NAME: Not reportedBUSINESS TYPE: Not reportedTAX REG NBR: Not reportedState Waste Code Desc: Not reportedFed Waste Code Desc: 81232NAICS Code: WAD980984322Facility ID: 14021FS Id: WAD980984322EPA I: Inactive Drycleaners: BUSY BEE CLEANERS (Continued)1001490399 TC2826208.2s Page 85 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation Not reportedUSED OIL PROCESSOR: Not reportedUSED OIL TRANSFER FACILITY: Not reportedUSED OIL TRANSPORTER: Not reportedOFF SPEC FURNACE: Not reportedOFF SPEC INDUSTRY BOILER: Not reportedOFF SPEC UTILITY BOILER: Not reportedUW DESTINATION FACILITY: Not reportedUW LAMPS ACCUM: Not reportedUW MERCURY ACCUM: Not reportedUW THERMOSTATS ACCUM: Not reportedUW BATTERY ACCUM: Not reportedUW LAMPS GEN: Not reportedUW MERCURY GEN: Not reportedUW THERMOSTATS GEN: Not reportedUW BATTERY GEN: Not reportedOTHER EXEMPTION: Not reportedSMALL QTY EXEMPTION: Not reportedSMELTER DEFERRAL: Not reportedFURNACE BURNER: Not reportedINDUSTRY BOILER BURNER: Not reportedUTILITY BOILER BURNER: Not reportedGEN OTHER MARKETERS: Not reportedGEN MARKET TO BURNER: Not reportedGEN DANG FUEL: Not reportedIMMEDIATE RECYCLER: Not reportedTSDR FACILITY: Not reportedIMPORTER: Not reportedMIXED RADIOACTIVE: Not reportedTBG: Not reportedPBR: Not reportedTRANSFER FACILITY: Not reportedRECYCLER ONSITE: Not reportedTRANSPORTS OTHERS WASTE: Not reportedTRANSPORTS OWN WASTE: Not reportedONE TIME GENERATION: Not reportedBATCH GENERATION: Not reportedMONTHLY GENERATION: Not reportedGEN STATUS CD: Not reportedFORM CONTACT EMAIL: Not reportedFORM CONTACT PHONE NBR: Not reportedFORM CONTACT COUNTRY: Not reportedFORM CONTACT ZIP: Not reportedFORM CONTACT STATE: Not reportedFORM CONTACT CITY: Not reportedFORM CONTACT LINE2: Not reportedFORM CONTACT LINE1: Not reportedFORM CONTACT LAST NAME: Not reportedFORM CONTACT MIDDLE INIT: Not reportedFORM CONTACT FIRST NAME: Not reportedSITE CONTACT EMAIL: Not reportedSITE CONTACT PHONE NBR: Not reportedSITE CONTACT COUNTRY: Not reportedSITE CONTACT ZIP: Not reportedSITE CONTACT STATE: Not reportedSITE CONTACT CITY: Not reportedSITE CONTACT LINE2: Not reportedSITE CONTACT LINE1: BUSY BEE CLEANERS (Continued)1001490399 TC2826208.2s Page 86 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation Not reportedComments: Not reportedUSED OIL FUEL MARKETER MEETS SPECS: Not reportedUSED OIL FUEL MARKETER DIR SHIPMENTS: Not reportedUSED OIL REREFINER: BUSY BEE CLEANERS (Continued)1001490399 Not reportedTank Overfill Prevention: Not reportedTank Spill Prevention: Not reportedTank Pumping System: 1/1/0001Tank Closure Date: 1/1/0001Tank Permit Expiration Date: ExemptTank Status: 8/26/1996TankSystem Status Change Date: ExemptTankSystem Status: 1/1/0001Tank Upgrade Date: 111 TO 1,100 GallonsCapacity: 12/31/1964Install Date: 1Tank Name: 13581Tank ID: 2062352513Phone Number: Not reportedUBI: 48.43919999999Long Sec: 10Long Min: -122Long Deg: 24.6311999999961Lat Sec: 30Lat Min: 47Lat Deg: 4787Site ID: 57537131Facility ID: UST: 5/3/2000Interaction End Date: 2/29/2000Interaction Start Date: 4787Federal Program Indentifier: IInteraction Status: Underground Storage TankInteraction (Aka Env Int) Description: USTInteraction (Aka Env Int) Type Code: 57537131Geographic Location Identifier (Alias Facid): NLocation Verified Code: 5Coordinate Point Geographic Position Code: 6Horizontal Accuracy Code: 4Coordinate Point Areal Extent Code: -122.180122Longitude Decimal Degrees: 47.506841999999999Latitude Decimal Degrees: NORTH HIGHLANDS COMMUNITY CENTERFacility Name: 57537131Geographic location identifier (alias facid): -122.180122Longitude: 47.506841999999999Latitude: 57537131Facility Id: ALLSITES: 2336 ft. 0.442 mi. Relative: Higher Actual: 379 ft. 1/4-1/2 RENTON, WA 98056 NNE UST3000 NE 16TH ST N/A 30 ALLSITESNORTH HIGHLANDS COMMUNITY CENTER U001123766 TC2826208.2s Page 87 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation Not reportedTag Number: 8/6/1996Tank Actual Status Date: Not reportedPipe Tightness Test: Not reportedTank Second Release Detection: Not reportedTank Primary Release Detection: Not reportedPipe Corrosion Protection: Not reportedPipe Second Release Detection: Not reportedPipe Primary Release Detection: Not reportedPipe Construction: Not reportedPipe Material: Not reportedTank Corrosion Protection: Not reportedTank Tightness Test: Not reportedTank Construction: SteelTank Material: NORTH HIGHLANDS COMMUNITY CENTER (Continued) U001123766 PrivateLegal status: Not reportedOwner/operator telephone: USOwner/operator country: RENTON, WA 98057 1601 N 8TH STOwner/operator address: KENWORTH TRUCK COMPANYOwner/operator name: Owner/Operator Summary: 100 kg of that material at any time hazardous waste during any calendar month, and accumulates more than from the cleanup of a spill, into or on any land or water, of acutely of any residue or contaminated soil, waste or other debris resulting kg of acutely hazardous waste at any time; or generates 100 kg or less hazardous waste during any calendar month, and accumulates more than 1 waste during any calendar month; or generates 1 kg or less of acutely cleanup of a spill, into or on any land or water, of acutely hazardous residue or contaminated soil, waste or other debris resulting from the during any calendar month; or generates more than 100 kg of any calendar month; or generates more than 1 kg of acutely hazardous waste Handler: generates 1,000 kg or more of hazardous waste during anyDescription: Large Quantity GeneratorClassification: PrivateLand type: 10EPA Region: Not reportedContact email: (425)227-5818Contact telephone: USContact country: RENTON, WA 98057-9001 1601 N 8TH STContact address: RICHARD A SKLARContact: WAD988517934EPA ID: RENTON, WA 98057 1601 N 8TH STFacility address: KENWORTH TRUCK CO RENTONFacility name: 02/11/2008Date form received by agency: RCRA-LQG: NPDES 2354 ft.MANIFEST 0.446 mi.ALLSITES Relative: Lower Actual: 248 ft. 1/4-1/2 FINDSRENTON, WA 98055 SW TRIS1601 N. 8TH ST.98055KNWRT16 31 RCRA-LQGKENWORTH TRUCK CO RENTON 1000838973 TC2826208.2s Page 88 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation Large Quantity GeneratorClassification: KENWORTH TRUCK COMPANYSite name: KENWORTH TRUCK CO RENTONFacility name: 03/31/1994Date form received by agency: Large Quantity GeneratorClassification: KENWORTH TRUCK COMPANY - RENTONSite name: KENWORTH TRUCK CO RENTONFacility name: 03/01/1996Date form received by agency: Large Quantity GeneratorClassification: KENWORTH TRUCK CO RENTONFacility name: 03/02/1998Date form received by agency: Large Quantity GeneratorClassification: KENWORTH TRUCK CO RENTONFacility name: 03/06/2000Date form received by agency: Large Quantity GeneratorClassification: KENWORTH TRUCK CO RENTONFacility name: 02/28/2002Date form received by agency: Large Quantity GeneratorClassification: KENWORTH TRUCK CO RENTONFacility name: 12/31/2003Date form received by agency: Large Quantity GeneratorClassification: KENWORTH TRUCK CO RENTONFacility name: 12/31/2005Date form received by agency: Large Quantity GeneratorClassification: KENWORTH TRUCK CO RENTONFacility name: 12/31/2007Date form received by agency: Historical Generators: Commercial status unknownOff-site waste receiver: NoUsed oil transporter: NoUsed oil transfer facility: NoUsed oil Specification marketer: NoUsed oil fuel marketer to burner: NoUser oil refiner: NoUsed oil processor: NoUsed oil fuel burner: NoFurnace exemption: NoOn-site burner exemption: NoUnderground injection activity: NoTreater, storer or disposer of HW: NoTransporter of hazardous waste: NoRecycler of hazardous waste: NoMixed waste (haz. and radioactive): NoU.S. importer of hazardous waste: Handler Activities Summary: Not reportedOwner/Op end date: 01/01/1993Owner/Op start date: OperatorOwner/Operator Type: KENWORTH TRUCK CO RENTON (Continued) 1000838973 TC2826208.2s Page 89 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation LISTED IN F001, F002, OR F004; AND STILL BOTTOMS FROM THE RECOVERY OF ONE OR MORE OF THE ABOVE NON-HALOGENATED SOLVENTS OR THOSE SOLVENTS CONTAINING, BEFORE USE, A TOTAL OF TEN PERCENT OR MORE (BY VOLUME) OF 2-ETHOXYETHANOL, AND 2-NITROPROPANE; ALL SPENT SOLVENT MIXTURES/BLENDS KETONE, CARBON DISULFIDE, ISOBUTANOL, PYRIDINE, BENZENE, THE FOLLOWING SPENT NON-HALOGENATED SOLVENTS: TOLUENE, METHYL ETHYLWaste name: F005Waste code: 105947Amount (Lbs): MIXTURES. BOTTOMS FROM THE RECOVERY OF THESE SPENT SOLVENTS AND SPENT SOLVENT MORE OF THOSE SOLVENTS LISTED IN F001, F002, F004, AND F005, AND STILL SOLVENTS, AND, A TOTAL OF TEN PERCENT OR MORE (BY VOLUME) OF ONE OR CONTAINING, BEFORE USE, ONE OR MORE OF THE ABOVE NON-HALOGENATED NON-HALOGENATED SOLVENTS; AND ALL SPENT SOLVENT MIXTURES/BLENDS MIXTURES/BLENDS CONTAINING, BEFORE USE, ONLY THE ABOVE SPENT ALCOHOL, CYCLOHEXANONE, AND METHANOL; ALL SPENT SOLVENT ACETATE, ETHYL BENZENE, ETHYL ETHER, METHYL ISOBUTYL KETONE, N-BUTYL THE FOLLOWING SPENT NON-HALOGENATED SOLVENTS: XYLENE, ACETONE, ETHYLWaste name: F003Waste code: 4146Amount (Lbs): SPENT SOLVENTS AND SPENT SOLVENT MIXTURES. IN F002, F004, AND F005, AND STILL BOTTOMS FROM THE RECOVERY OF THESE ONE OR MORE OF THE ABOVE HALOGENATED SOLVENTS OR THOSE SOLVENTS LISTED CONTAINING, BEFORE USE, A TOTAL OF TEN PERCENT OR MORE (BY VOLUME) OF FLUOROCARBONS; ALL SPENT SOLVENT MIXTURES/BLENDS USED IN DEGREASING 1,1,1-TRICHLOROETHANE, CARBON TETRACHLORIDE, AND CHLORINATED TETRACHLOROETHYLENE, TRICHLOROETHYLENE, METHYLENE CHLORIDE, THE FOLLOWING SPENT HALOGENATED SOLVENTS USED IN DEGREASING:Waste name: F001Waste code: 16135Amount (Lbs): METHYL ETHYL KETONEWaste name: D035Waste code: 11672Amount (Lbs): CHROMIUMWaste name: D007Waste code: 15284Amount (Lbs): CADMIUMWaste name: D006Waste code: 95266Amount (Lbs): WHICH WOULD BE CONSIDERED AS IGNITABLE HAZARDOUS WASTE. MATERIAL. LACQUER THINNER IS AN EXAMPLE OF A COMMONLY USED SOLVENT WHICH CAN BE OBTAINED FROM THE MANUFACTURER OR DISTRIBUTOR OF THE FLASH POINT OF A WASTE IS TO REVIEW THE MATERIAL SAFETY DATA SHEET, CLOSED CUP FLASH POINT TESTER. ANOTHER METHOD OF DETERMINING THE LESS THAN 140 DEGREES FAHRENHEIT AS DETERMINED BY A PENSKY-MARTENS IGNITABLE HAZARDOUS WASTES ARE THOSE WASTES WHICH HAVE A FLASHPOINT OFWaste name: D001Waste code: Annual Waste Handled: Last Biennial Reporting Year: 2009 Biennial Reports: KENWORTH TRUCK CO RENTON (Continued) 1000838973 TC2826208.2s Page 90 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation State Enforcement lead agency: Not reported Enf. disp. status date: Not reported Enf. disposition status: 12/27/2007 Enforcement action date: WRITTEN INFORMAL Enforcement action: StateViolation lead agency: 01/09/2008Date achieved compliance: 12/12/2007Date violation determined: Universal Waste - Small Quantity HandlersArea of violation: Not reportedRegulation violated: Not reported Paid penalty amount: Not reported Final penalty amount: Not reported Proposed penalty amount: State Enforcement lead agency: Not reported Enf. disp. status date: Not reported Enf. disposition status: 12/27/2007 Enforcement action date: WRITTEN INFORMAL Enforcement action: StateViolation lead agency: 01/11/2008Date achieved compliance: 12/12/2007Date violation determined: Universal Waste - Small Quantity HandlersArea of violation: Not reportedRegulation violated: Not reported Paid penalty amount: Not reported Final penalty amount: Not reported Proposed penalty amount: State Enforcement lead agency: Not reported Enf. disp. status date: Not reported Enf. disposition status: 12/27/2007 Enforcement action date: WRITTEN INFORMAL Enforcement action: StateViolation lead agency: 01/18/2008Date achieved compliance: 12/12/2007Date violation determined: Generators - Pre-transportArea of violation: Not reportedRegulation violated: Not reported Paid penalty amount: Not reported Final penalty amount: Not reported Proposed penalty amount: State Enforcement lead agency: Not reported Enf. disp. status date: Not reported Enf. disposition status: 12/27/2007 Enforcement action date: WRITTEN INFORMAL Enforcement action: StateViolation lead agency: 01/11/2008Date achieved compliance: 12/12/2007Date violation determined: Generators - Pre-transportArea of violation: Not reportedRegulation violated: Facility Has Received Notices of Violations: 25414Amount (Lbs): THESE SPENT SOLVENTS AND SPENT SOLVENT MIXTURES. KENWORTH TRUCK CO RENTON (Continued) 1000838973 TC2826208.2s Page 91 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation Not reported Proposed penalty amount: State Enforcement lead agency: Not reported Enf. disp. status date: Not reported Enf. disposition status: 08/30/2004 Enforcement action date: WRITTEN INFORMAL Enforcement action: StateViolation lead agency: 09/30/2004Date achieved compliance: 08/25/2004Date violation determined: Generators - GeneralArea of violation: SR - -573(10)Regulation violated: Not reported Paid penalty amount: Not reported Final penalty amount: Not reported Proposed penalty amount: State Enforcement lead agency: Not reported Enf. disp. status date: Not reported Enf. disposition status: 08/30/2004 Enforcement action date: WRITTEN INFORMAL Enforcement action: StateViolation lead agency: 09/03/2004Date achieved compliance: 08/25/2004Date violation determined: Generators - GeneralArea of violation: SR - -630(5)(a) / -200(1)(b)Regulation violated: Not reported Paid penalty amount: Not reported Final penalty amount: Not reported Proposed penalty amount: State Enforcement lead agency: Not reported Enf. disp. status date: Not reported Enf. disposition status: 08/30/2004 Enforcement action date: WRITTEN INFORMAL Enforcement action: StateViolation lead agency: 09/03/2004Date achieved compliance: 08/25/2004Date violation determined: Generators - GeneralArea of violation: SR - -515(6)Regulation violated: Not reported Paid penalty amount: Not reported Final penalty amount: Not reported Proposed penalty amount: State Enforcement lead agency: Not reported Enf. disp. status date: Not reported Enf. disposition status: 08/30/2004 Enforcement action date: WRITTEN INFORMAL Enforcement action: StateViolation lead agency: 11/02/2004Date achieved compliance: 08/25/2004Date violation determined: Generators - Records/ReportingArea of violation: SR - -330(2) / -200(1)(e)Regulation violated: Not reported Paid penalty amount: Not reported Final penalty amount: Not reported Proposed penalty amount: KENWORTH TRUCK CO RENTON (Continued) 1000838973 TC2826208.2s Page 92 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation Not reported Final penalty amount: Not reported Proposed penalty amount: State Enforcement lead agency: Not reported Enf. disp. status date: Not reported Enf. disposition status: 07/31/1996 Enforcement action date: WRITTEN INFORMAL Enforcement action: StateViolation lead agency: 08/01/1996Date achieved compliance: 07/31/1996Date violation determined: Generators - GeneralArea of violation: SR - 200(c)(d)Regulation violated: Not reported Paid penalty amount: Not reported Final penalty amount: Not reported Proposed penalty amount: State Enforcement lead agency: Not reported Enf. disp. status date: Not reported Enf. disposition status: 07/31/1996 Enforcement action date: WRITTEN INFORMAL Enforcement action: StateViolation lead agency: 08/12/1996Date achieved compliance: 07/31/1996Date violation determined: Generators - GeneralArea of violation: SR - 630(6)Regulation violated: Not reported Paid penalty amount: Not reported Final penalty amount: Not reported Proposed penalty amount: State Enforcement lead agency: Not reported Enf. disp. status date: Not reported Enf. disposition status: 05/29/2001 Enforcement action date: WRITTEN INFORMAL Enforcement action: StateViolation lead agency: 07/30/2001Date achieved compliance: 03/07/2001Date violation determined: Generators - GeneralArea of violation: SR - -170(1) / 070Regulation violated: Not reported Paid penalty amount: Not reported Final penalty amount: Not reported Proposed penalty amount: State Enforcement lead agency: Not reported Enf. disp. status date: Not reported Enf. disposition status: 05/29/2001 Enforcement action date: WRITTEN INFORMAL Enforcement action: StateViolation lead agency: 03/19/2001Date achieved compliance: 03/07/2001Date violation determined: Generators - GeneralArea of violation: SR - -200(2)Regulation violated: Not reported Paid penalty amount: Not reported Final penalty amount: KENWORTH TRUCK CO RENTON (Continued) 1000838973 TC2826208.2s Page 93 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation StateEvaluation lead agency: 07/30/2001Date achieved compliance: Generators - GeneralArea of violation: COMPLIANCE EVALUATION INSPECTION ON-SITEEvaluation: 03/07/2001Evaluation date: StateEvaluation lead agency: 09/03/2004Date achieved compliance: Generators - GeneralArea of violation: COMPLIANCE EVALUATION INSPECTION ON-SITEEvaluation: 08/25/2004Evaluation date: StateEvaluation lead agency: 11/02/2004Date achieved compliance: Generators - Records/ReportingArea of violation: COMPLIANCE EVALUATION INSPECTION ON-SITEEvaluation: 08/25/2004Evaluation date: StateEvaluation lead agency: 09/30/2004Date achieved compliance: Generators - GeneralArea of violation: COMPLIANCE EVALUATION INSPECTION ON-SITEEvaluation: 08/25/2004Evaluation date: StateEvaluation lead agency: 01/11/2008Date achieved compliance: Generators - Pre-transportArea of violation: COMPLIANCE EVALUATION INSPECTION ON-SITEEvaluation: 12/12/2007Evaluation date: StateEvaluation lead agency: 01/18/2008Date achieved compliance: Generators - Pre-transportArea of violation: COMPLIANCE EVALUATION INSPECTION ON-SITEEvaluation: 12/12/2007Evaluation date: StateEvaluation lead agency: 01/11/2008Date achieved compliance: Universal Waste - Small Quantity HandlersArea of violation: COMPLIANCE EVALUATION INSPECTION ON-SITEEvaluation: 12/12/2007Evaluation date: StateEvaluation lead agency: 01/09/2008Date achieved compliance: Universal Waste - Small Quantity HandlersArea of violation: COMPLIANCE EVALUATION INSPECTION ON-SITEEvaluation: 12/12/2007Evaluation date: StateEvaluation lead agency: Not reportedDate achieved compliance: Not reportedArea of violation: COMPLIANCE ASSISTANCE VISITEvaluation: 10/05/2009Evaluation date: Evaluation Action Summary: Not reported Paid penalty amount: KENWORTH TRUCK CO RENTON (Continued) 1000838973 TC2826208.2s Page 94 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation corrective action activities required under RCRA. program staff to track the notification, permit, compliance, and and treat, store, or dispose of hazardous waste. RCRAInfo allows RCRA events and activities related to facilities that generate, transport, Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) program through the tracking of RCRAInfo is a national information system that supports the Resource transported off-site. these facilities release directly to air, water, land, or that are from facilities on the amounts of over 300 listed toxic chemicals that US EPA TRIS (Toxics Release Inventory System) contains information their precursors, as well as hazardous air pollutants (HAPs). on stationary and mobile sources that emit criteria air pollutants and The NEI (National Emissions Inventory) database contains information of the Clean Air Act. redesign to support facility operating permits required under Title V estimation of total national emissions. AFS is undergoing a major to comply with regulatory programs and by EPA as an input for the AFS data are utilized by states to prepare State Implementation Plans used to track emissions and compliance data from industrial plants. information concerning airborne pollution in the United States. AFS is Aerometric Data (SAROAD). AIRS is the national repository for National Emission Data System (NEDS), and the Storage and Retrieval of Subsystem) replaces the former Compliance Data System (CDS), the AFS (Aerometric Information Retrieval System (AIRS) Facility Quality Programs. Quality, Dam Safety, Hazardous Waste, Toxics Cleanup, and Water facility/site that is currently, or has been, of interest to the Air Department of Ecology. This system contains key information for each means to query and display data maintained by the Washington Washington Facility / Site Identification System (WA-FSIS) provides a Environmental Interest/Information System 110000489301Registry ID: FINDS: StateEvaluation lead agency: 08/01/1996Date achieved compliance: Generators - GeneralArea of violation: COMPLIANCE EVALUATION INSPECTION ON-SITEEvaluation: 07/31/1996Evaluation date: StateEvaluation lead agency: 08/12/1996Date achieved compliance: Generators - GeneralArea of violation: COMPLIANCE EVALUATION INSPECTION ON-SITEEvaluation: 07/31/1996Evaluation date: StateEvaluation lead agency: 03/19/2001Date achieved compliance: Generators - GeneralArea of violation: COMPLIANCE EVALUATION INSPECTION ON-SITEEvaluation: 03/07/2001Evaluation date: KENWORTH TRUCK CO RENTON (Continued) 1000838973 TC2826208.2s Page 95 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation 1/1/1977Interaction Start Date: Not reportedFederal Program Indentifier: AInteraction Status: Air Qual Oper Permit SourceInteraction (Aka Env Int) Description: AQOPSInteraction (Aka Env Int) Type Code: 13289817Geographic Location Identifier (Alias Facid): Not reportedInteraction End Date: 3/12/1993Interaction Start Date: WAR000858Federal Program Indentifier: AInteraction Status: Industrial SW GPInteraction (Aka Env Int) Description: INDUSTGPInteraction (Aka Env Int) Type Code: 13289817Geographic Location Identifier (Alias Facid): Not reportedInteraction End Date: 1/1/1995Interaction Start Date: WAD988517934Federal Program Indentifier: AInteraction Status: Hazardous Waste PlannerInteraction (Aka Env Int) Description: HWPInteraction (Aka Env Int) Type Code: 13289817Geographic Location Identifier (Alias Facid): Not reportedInteraction End Date: 2/16/1993Interaction Start Date: WAD988517934Federal Program Indentifier: AInteraction Status: Hazardous Waste GeneratorInteraction (Aka Env Int) Description: HWGInteraction (Aka Env Int) Type Code: 13289817Geographic Location Identifier (Alias Facid): Not reportedInteraction End Date: 1/1/1993Interaction Start Date: WAD988517934Federal Program Indentifier: AInteraction Status: Toxics Release InventoryInteraction (Aka Env Int) Description: TRIInteraction (Aka Env Int) Type Code: 13289817Geographic Location Identifier (Alias Facid): NLocation Verified Code: 99Coordinate Point Geographic Position Code: 99Horizontal Accuracy Code: 99Coordinate Point Areal Extent Code: -122.191391Longitude Decimal Degrees: 47.491390000000003Latitude Decimal Degrees: KENWORTH TRUCK CO RENTONFacility Name: 13289817Geographic location identifier (alias facid): -122.191391Longitude: 47.491390000000003Latitude: 13289817Facility Id: ALLSITES: permit, compliance, and enforcement status of NPDES facilities. Elimination System (NPDES) permit holding facilities. PCS tracks the information system that contains data on National Pollutant Discharge PCS (Permit Compliance System) is a computerized management KENWORTH TRUCK CO RENTON (Continued) 1000838973 TC2826208.2s Page 96 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation (425)468-7400LEGAL PHONE NBR: UNITED STATESLEGAL COUNTRY: BELLEVUE, WA 98009-1518LEGAL CITY,ST,ZIP: PO Box 1518LEGAL ADDR LINE1: PrivateLEGAL ORG TYPE: Paccar IncLEGAL ORG NAME: UNITED STATESMAIL COUNTRY: RENTON, WA 98057-9001MAIL CITY,ST,ZIP: 1601 N 8th StMAIL ADDR LINE1: Kenworth Truck CoMAIL NAME: Heavy Duty Truck AssemblyBUSINESS TYPE: 33612NAICS CD: 177000505TAX REG NBR: Not reportedFacility Address 2: WAD988517934EPA ID: FalseOff-specification used oil burner - industrial furnace: FalseOff-specification used oil burner - industrial boiler: FalseOff-specification used oil burner - utility boiler: FalseDestination Facility for Universal Waste: FalseUniversal waste - lamps - accumulate: FalseUniversal waste - mercury - accumulate: FalseUniversal waste - thermostats - accumulate: FalseUniversal waste - batteries - accumulate: FalseUniversal waste - lamps - generate: FalseUniversal waste - mercury - generate: FalseUniversal waste - thermostats - generate: FalseUniversal waste - batteries - generate: FalseSmelter defferal: FalseIndustrial Furnace: FalseIndustry boiler burner: FalseUtility boiler burner: False"Other marketers (i.e., blender, distributor, etc.)": FalseGenerator marketing to burner: FalseGenerator of dangerous fuel waste: FalseTreatment/Storage/Disposal/Recycling Facility: FalseImmediate recycler: FalseImporter of hazardous waste: FalseMixed radioactive waste: FalseTreatment by Generator: FalsePermit by Rule: Not reportedData Year: Not reportedForm Comm: Not reportedFWC Desc: Not reportedSWC Desc: 13289817Facility Site ID Number: WA MANIFEST: Not reportedInteraction End Date: 1/1/1993Interaction Start Date: WAD988517934Federal Program Indentifier: AInteraction Status: Emergency/Haz Chem Rpt TIER2Interaction (Aka Env Int) Description: TIER2Interaction (Aka Env Int) Type Code: 13289817Geographic Location Identifier (Alias Facid): Not reportedInteraction End Date: KENWORTH TRUCK CO RENTON (Continued) 1000838973 TC2826208.2s Page 97 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation NoGenerator marketing to burner: NoGenerator of dangerous fuel waste: NoTreatment/Storage/Disposal/Recycling Facility: NoImmediate recycler: NoImporter of hazardous waste: NoMixed radioactive waste: NoTreatment by Generator: NoPermit by Rule: Not reportedData Year: Not reportedForm Comm: Not reportedFWC Desc: Not reportedSWC Desc: 13289817Facility Site ID Number: FalseUSED OIL FUEL MRKTR MEETS SPECS: FalseUSED OIL FUEL MRKTR DIRECTS SHPMNTS: FalseUSED OIL REREFINER: FalseUSED OIL PROCESSOR: FalseUSED OIL TRANSFER FACLTY: FalseUSED OIL TRANSPORTER: FalseUW BATTERY GEN: Not reportedOTHER EXEMPTION: FalseTRANSFER FACILITY: FalseRECYCLER ONSITE: FalseTRANSPORTS OTHRS WASTE: FalseTRANSPORTS OWN WASTE: FalseONE TIME GENERATION: FalseBATCH GENERATION: FalseMONTHLY GENERATION: LQGGEN STATUS CD: rich.sklar@paccar.comFORM CONTACT EMAIL: 425227-5818FORM CONTACT PHONE NBR: UNITED STATESFORM CONTACT COUNTRY: RENTON, WA 98057-9001FORM CONTACT CITY,ST,ZIP: 1601 N 8th STFORM CONTACT ADDR LINE1: Richard SklarFORM CONTACT NAME: rich.sklar@paccar.comSITE CONTACT EMAIL: 425227-5818SITE CONTACT PHONE NBR: UNITED STATESSITE CONTACT COUNTRY: RENTON, WA 98057-9001SITE CONTACT ZIP: 1601 N 8th STSITE CONTACT ADDR LINE1: Richard A SklarSITE CONTACT NAME: 01/01/93OPERATOR EFFECTIVE DATE: 425227-5818OPERATOR PHONE NBR: UNITED STATESOPERATOR COUNTRY: RENTON, WA 98057-9001OPERATOR CITY,ST,ZIP: 1601 N 8th StOPERATOR ADDR LINE1: PrivateOPERATOR ORG TYPE: KENWORTH TRUCK COMPANYOPERATOR ORG NAME: (425)468-7400LAND PHONE NBR: UNITED STATESLAND COUNTRY: BELLEVUE, WA 98009-1518LAND CITY,ST,ZIP: PO Box 1518LAND ADDR LINE1: Not reportedLAND PERSON NAME: PrivateLAND ORG TYPE: Paccar IncLAND ORG NAME: 1/1/1993LEGAL EFFECTIVE DATE: KENWORTH TRUCK CO RENTON (Continued) 1000838973 TC2826208.2s Page 98 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation UNITED STATESFORM CONTACT COUNTRY: RENTON, WA 98057-9001FORM CONTACT CITY,ST,ZIP: PO BOX 9001FORM CONTACT ADDR LINE1: Richard SklarFORM CONTACT NAME: rich.sklar@paccar.comSITE CONTACT EMAIL: 425227-5818SITE CONTACT PHONE NBR: UNITED STATESSITE CONTACT COUNTRY: RENTON, WA 98057-9001SITE CONTACT ZIP: PO BOX 9001SITE CONTACT ADDR LINE1: Richard A SklarSITE CONTACT NAME: 1/1/1993OPERATOR EFFECTIVE DATE: 425227-5818OPERATOR PHONE NBR: UNITED STATESOPERATOR COUNTRY: RENTON, WA 98057-9001OPERATOR CITY,ST,ZIP: PO BOX 9001OPERATOR ADDR LINE1: PrivateOPERATOR ORG TYPE: KENWORTH TRUCK COMPANYOPERATOR ORG NAME: (425)468-7400LAND PHONE NBR: UNITED STATESLAND COUNTRY: BELLEVUE, WA 98009-1518LAND CITY,ST,ZIP: PO Box 1518LAND ADDR LINE1: Not reportedLAND PERSON NAME: PrivateLAND ORG TYPE: Paccar IncLAND ORG NAME: 1/1/1993LEGAL EFFECTIVE DATE: (425)468-7400LEGAL PHONE NBR: UNITED STATESLEGAL COUNTRY: BELLEVUE, WA 98009-1518LEGAL CITY,ST,ZIP: PO Box 1518LEGAL ADDR LINE1: PrivateLEGAL ORG TYPE: Paccar IncLEGAL ORG NAME: UNITED STATESMAIL COUNTRY: RENTON, WA 98057-9001MAIL CITY,ST,ZIP: PO BOX 9001MAIL ADDR LINE1: Kenworth Truck CoMAIL NAME: Heavy Duty Truck AssemblyBUSINESS TYPE: 33612NAICS CD: 177000505TAX REG NBR: Not reportedFacility Address 2: WAD988517934EPA ID: NoOff-specification used oil burner - industrial furnace: NoOff-specification used oil burner - industrial boiler: NoOff-specification used oil burner - utility boiler: NoDestination Facility for Universal Waste: NoUniversal waste - lamps - accumulate: NoUniversal waste - mercury - accumulate: NoUniversal waste - thermostats - accumulate: NoUniversal waste - batteries - accumulate: NoUniversal waste - lamps - generate: NoUniversal waste - mercury - generate: NoUniversal waste - thermostats - generate: NoUniversal waste - batteries - generate: NoSmelter defferal: NoIndustrial Furnace: NoIndustry boiler burner: NoUtility boiler burner: No"Other marketers (i.e., blender, distributor, etc.)": KENWORTH TRUCK CO RENTON (Continued) 1000838973 TC2826208.2s Page 99 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation RENTON, WA 98057-9001MAIL CITY,ST,ZIP: P.O. Box 9001MAIL ADDR LINE1: Kenworth Truck CoMAIL NAME: Heavy Duty Truck AssemblyBUSINESS TYPE: 336120NAICS CD: 177000505TAX REG NBR: Not reportedFacility Address 2: WAD988517934EPA ID: FalseOff-specification used oil burner - industrial furnace: FalseOff-specification used oil burner - industrial boiler: FalseOff-specification used oil burner - utility boiler: FalseDestination Facility for Universal Waste: FalseUniversal waste - lamps - accumulate: FalseUniversal waste - mercury - accumulate: FalseUniversal waste - thermostats - accumulate: FalseUniversal waste - batteries - accumulate: FalseUniversal waste - lamps - generate: FalseUniversal waste - mercury - generate: FalseUniversal waste - thermostats - generate: FalseUniversal waste - batteries - generate: FalseSmelter defferal: FalseIndustrial Furnace: FalseIndustry boiler burner: FalseUtility boiler burner: False"Other marketers (i.e., blender, distributor, etc.)": FalseGenerator marketing to burner: FalseGenerator of dangerous fuel waste: FalseTreatment/Storage/Disposal/Recycling Facility: FalseImmediate recycler: FalseImporter of hazardous waste: FalseMixed radioactive waste: FalseTreatment by Generator: FalsePermit by Rule: 2009Data Year: Not reportedForm Comm: D001, D004, D005, D006, D007, D008, D010, D035, F003, F005FWC Desc: WT02, WP02SWC Desc: 13289817Facility Site ID Number: NoUSED OIL FUEL MRKTR MEETS SPECS: NoUSED OIL FUEL MRKTR DIRECTS SHPMNTS: NoUSED OIL REREFINER: NoUSED OIL PROCESSOR: NoUSED OIL TRANSFER FACLTY: NoUSED OIL TRANSPORTER: NoUW BATTERY GEN: Not reportedOTHER EXEMPTION: NoTRANSFER FACILITY: NoRECYCLER ONSITE: NoTRANSPORTS OTHRS WASTE: NoTRANSPORTS OWN WASTE: NoONE TIME GENERATION: NoBATCH GENERATION: YesMONTHLY GENERATION: LQGGEN STATUS CD: rich.sklar@paccar.comFORM CONTACT EMAIL: 425227-5818FORM CONTACT PHONE NBR: KENWORTH TRUCK CO RENTON (Continued) 1000838973 TC2826208.2s Page 100 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation FalsePermit by Rule: 2008Data Year: Not reportedForm Comm: Not reportedFWC Desc: Not reportedSWC Desc: 13289817Facility Site ID Number: FalseUSED OIL FUEL MRKTR MEETS SPECS: FalseUSED OIL FUEL MRKTR DIRECTS SHPMNTS: FalseUSED OIL REREFINER: FalseUSED OIL PROCESSOR: FalseUSED OIL TRANSFER FACLTY: FalseUSED OIL TRANSPORTER: FalseUW BATTERY GEN: Not reportedOTHER EXEMPTION: FalseTRANSFER FACILITY: FalseRECYCLER ONSITE: FalseTRANSPORTS OTHRS WASTE: FalseTRANSPORTS OWN WASTE: FalseONE TIME GENERATION: FalseBATCH GENERATION: TrueMONTHLY GENERATION: LQGGEN STATUS CD: rich.sklar@paccar.comFORM CONTACT EMAIL: (425) 227-5818FORM CONTACT PHONE NBR: UNITED STATESFORM CONTACT COUNTRY: RENTON, WA 98057-9001FORM CONTACT CITY,ST,ZIP: P.O. Box 9001FORM CONTACT ADDR LINE1: Richard A SklarFORM CONTACT NAME: rich.sklar@paccar.comSITE CONTACT EMAIL: (425) 227-5818SITE CONTACT PHONE NBR: UNITED STATESSITE CONTACT COUNTRY: RENTON, WA 98057-9001SITE CONTACT ZIP: P.O. Box 9001SITE CONTACT ADDR LINE1: Richard A SklarSITE CONTACT NAME: 1/1/1993OPERATOR EFFECTIVE DATE: (425) 227-5818OPERATOR PHONE NBR: UNITED STATESOPERATOR COUNTRY: RENTON, WA 98057-9001OPERATOR CITY,ST,ZIP: P.O. Box 9001OPERATOR ADDR LINE1: PrivateOPERATOR ORG TYPE: KENWORTH TRUCK COMPANYOPERATOR ORG NAME: (425)468-7400LAND PHONE NBR: UNITED STATESLAND COUNTRY: BELLEVUE, WA 98009-1518LAND CITY,ST,ZIP: PO Box 1518LAND ADDR LINE1: Not reportedLAND PERSON NAME: PrivateLAND ORG TYPE: Paccar IncLAND ORG NAME: 1/1/1993LEGAL EFFECTIVE DATE: (425)468-7400LEGAL PHONE NBR: UNITED STATESLEGAL COUNTRY: BELLEVUE, WA 98009-1518LEGAL CITY,ST,ZIP: PO Box 1518LEGAL ADDR LINE1: PrivateLEGAL ORG TYPE: Paccar IncLEGAL ORG NAME: UNITED STATESMAIL COUNTRY: KENWORTH TRUCK CO RENTON (Continued) 1000838973 TC2826208.2s Page 101 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation RENTON, WA 98057-9001SITE CONTACT ZIP: P.O. Box 9001SITE CONTACT ADDR LINE1: Richard A SklarSITE CONTACT NAME: 1/1/1993OPERATOR EFFECTIVE DATE: (425) 227-5818OPERATOR PHONE NBR: UNITED STATESOPERATOR COUNTRY: RENTON, WA 98057-9001OPERATOR CITY,ST,ZIP: P.O. Box 9001OPERATOR ADDR LINE1: PrivateOPERATOR ORG TYPE: KENWORTH TRUCK COMPANYOPERATOR ORG NAME: (425)468-7400LAND PHONE NBR: UNITED STATESLAND COUNTRY: BELLEVUE, WA 98009-1518LAND CITY,ST,ZIP: PO Box 1518LAND ADDR LINE1: Not reportedLAND PERSON NAME: PrivateLAND ORG TYPE: Paccar IncLAND ORG NAME: 1/1/1993LEGAL EFFECTIVE DATE: (425)468-7400LEGAL PHONE NBR: UNITED STATESLEGAL COUNTRY: BELLEVUE, WA 98009-1518LEGAL CITY,ST,ZIP: PO Box 1518LEGAL ADDR LINE1: PrivateLEGAL ORG TYPE: Paccar IncLEGAL ORG NAME: UNITED STATESMAIL COUNTRY: RENTON, WA 98057-9001MAIL CITY,ST,ZIP: P.O. Box 9001MAIL ADDR LINE1: Kenworth Truck CoMAIL NAME: Heavy Duty Truck AssemblyBUSINESS TYPE: 33612NAICS CD: 177000505TAX REG NBR: Not reportedFacility Address 2: WAD988517934EPA ID: FalseOff-specification used oil burner - industrial furnace: FalseOff-specification used oil burner - industrial boiler: FalseOff-specification used oil burner - utility boiler: FalseDestination Facility for Universal Waste: FalseUniversal waste - lamps - accumulate: FalseUniversal waste - mercury - accumulate: FalseUniversal waste - thermostats - accumulate: FalseUniversal waste - batteries - accumulate: FalseUniversal waste - lamps - generate: FalseUniversal waste - mercury - generate: FalseUniversal waste - thermostats - generate: FalseUniversal waste - batteries - generate: FalseSmelter defferal: FalseIndustrial Furnace: FalseIndustry boiler burner: FalseUtility boiler burner: False"Other marketers (i.e., blender, distributor, etc.)": FalseGenerator marketing to burner: FalseGenerator of dangerous fuel waste: FalseTreatment/Storage/Disposal/Recycling Facility: FalseImmediate recycler: FalseImporter of hazardous waste: FalseMixed radioactive waste: FalseTreatment by Generator: KENWORTH TRUCK CO RENTON (Continued) 1000838973 TC2826208.2s Page 102 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation WAD988517934EPA ID: FALSEOff-specification used oil burner - industrial furnace: FALSEOff-specification used oil burner - industrial boiler: FALSEOff-specification used oil burner - utility boiler: FALSEDestination Facility for Universal Waste: FALSEUniversal waste - lamps - accumulate: FALSEUniversal waste - mercury - accumulate: FALSEUniversal waste - thermostats - accumulate: FALSEUniversal waste - batteries - accumulate: FALSEUniversal waste - lamps - generate: FALSEUniversal waste - mercury - generate: FALSEUniversal waste - thermostats - generate: FALSEUniversal waste - batteries - generate: FALSESmelter defferal: FALSEIndustrial Furnace: FALSEIndustry boiler burner: FALSEUtility boiler burner: FALSE"Other marketers (i.e., blender, distributor, etc.)": FALSEGenerator marketing to burner: FALSEGenerator of dangerous fuel waste: FALSETreatment/Storage/Disposal/Recycling Facility: FALSEImmediate recycler: FALSEImporter of hazardous waste: FALSEMixed radioactive waste: FALSETreatment by Generator: FALSEPermit by Rule: Not reportedData Year: Not reportedForm Comm: Not reportedFWC Desc: Not reportedSWC Desc: 13289817Facility Site ID Number: FalseUSED OIL FUEL MRKTR MEETS SPECS: FalseUSED OIL FUEL MRKTR DIRECTS SHPMNTS: FalseUSED OIL REREFINER: FalseUSED OIL PROCESSOR: FalseUSED OIL TRANSFER FACLTY: FalseUSED OIL TRANSPORTER: FalseUW BATTERY GEN: Not reportedOTHER EXEMPTION: FalseTRANSFER FACILITY: FalseRECYCLER ONSITE: FalseTRANSPORTS OTHRS WASTE: FalseTRANSPORTS OWN WASTE: FalseONE TIME GENERATION: FalseBATCH GENERATION: TrueMONTHLY GENERATION: LQGGEN STATUS CD: rich.sklar@paccar.comFORM CONTACT EMAIL: (425) 227-5818FORM CONTACT PHONE NBR: UNITED STATESFORM CONTACT COUNTRY: RENTON, WA 98057-9001FORM CONTACT CITY,ST,ZIP: P.O. Box 9001FORM CONTACT ADDR LINE1: Richard SklarFORM CONTACT NAME: rich.sklar@paccar.comSITE CONTACT EMAIL: (425) 227-5818SITE CONTACT PHONE NBR: UNITED STATESSITE CONTACT COUNTRY: KENWORTH TRUCK CO RENTON (Continued) 1000838973 TC2826208.2s Page 103 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation FALSEUSED OIL FUEL MRKTR MEETS SPECS: FALSEUSED OIL FUEL MRKTR DIRECTS SHPMNTS: FALSEUSED OIL REREFINER: FALSEUSED OIL PROCESSOR: FALSEUSED OIL TRANSFER FACLTY: FALSEUSED OIL TRANSPORTER: FALSEUW BATTERY GEN: Not reportedOTHER EXEMPTION: FALSETRANSFER FACILITY: FALSERECYCLER ONSITE: FALSETRANSPORTS OTHRS WASTE: FALSETRANSPORTS OWN WASTE: FALSEONE TIME GENERATION: FALSEBATCH GENERATION: FALSEMONTHLY GENERATION: LQGGEN STATUS CD: rich.sklar@paccar.comFORM CONTACT EMAIL: 425227-5818FORM CONTACT PHONE NBR: UNITED STATESFORM CONTACT COUNTRY: RENTON, WA 98057-9001FORM CONTACT CITY,ST,ZIP: PO BOX 9001FORM CONTACT ADDR LINE1: Richard SklarFORM CONTACT NAME: rich.sklar@paccar.comSITE CONTACT EMAIL: 425227-5818SITE CONTACT PHONE NBR: UNITED STATESSITE CONTACT COUNTRY: RENTON, WA 98057-9001SITE CONTACT ZIP: PO BOX 9001SITE CONTACT ADDR LINE1: Richard A SklarSITE CONTACT NAME: 1/1/1993OPERATOR EFFECTIVE DATE: 425227-5818OPERATOR PHONE NBR: UNITED STATESOPERATOR COUNTRY: RENTON, WA 98057-9001OPERATOR CITY,ST,ZIP: PO BOX 9001OPERATOR ADDR LINE1: PrivateOPERATOR ORG TYPE: KENWORTH TRUCK COMPANYOPERATOR ORG NAME: (425)468-7400LAND PHONE NBR: UNITED STATESLAND COUNTRY: BELLEVUE, WA 98009-1518LAND CITY,ST,ZIP: PO Box 1518LAND ADDR LINE1: Not reportedLAND PERSON NAME: PrivateLAND ORG TYPE: Paccar IncLAND ORG NAME: 1/1/1993LEGAL EFFECTIVE DATE: (425)468-7400LEGAL PHONE NBR: UNITED STATESLEGAL COUNTRY: BELLEVUE, WA 98009-1518LEGAL CITY,ST,ZIP: PO Box 1518LEGAL ADDR LINE1: PrivateLEGAL ORG TYPE: Paccar IncLEGAL ORG NAME: UNITED STATESMAIL COUNTRY: RENTON, WA 98057-9001MAIL CITY,ST,ZIP: PO BOX 9001MAIL ADDR LINE1: Kenworth Truck CoMAIL NAME: Heavy Duty Truck AssemblyBUSINESS TYPE: 33612NAICS CD: 177000505TAX REG NBR: Not reportedFacility Address 2: KENWORTH TRUCK CO RENTON (Continued) 1000838973 TC2826208.2s Page 104 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation 1/1/2010Effective Date: 1/1/2015Permit Expiration Date: Cedar-SammamishWRIA: Jeff KilleleaEcology Contact: General PermitsFacility Size: 10/21/2009Permit Issue Date: WAR000858EPermit ID: 425.227.5818Contact Phone Number: Richard A. SklarContact Name: 122.18889Longitude: 47.496389999999998Latitude: Stormwater IndustrialFacility Type: NPDES: additional WA MANIFEST: detail in the EDR Site Report. Click this hyperlink while viewing on your computer to access KENWORTH TRUCK CO RENTON (Continued) 1000838973 Not reportedDioxin: Not reportedUXO Code: Not reportedMTBE Code: Not reportedArsenic Code: NORTHWESTResponsible Unit: Not reportedAsbestos: Not reportedRadioactive Wastes: Not reportedCorrosive Wastes: Not reportedReactive Wastes: Not reportedPhenolic Compounds: Not reportedPetroleum Products: Not reportedPesticides: SuspectedAffected Media Status: SoilAffected Media: 1/1/0001Media Status Desc: 47 29 10.698 / -122 10 50.696Lat/Long (dms): 47.486305 / -122.180749Lat/Long: -122.180749Longitude: 47.486305Latitude: Not reportedAcres Remediated: Not reportedCleanup Standard: Not reportedDrinking Water Type: Not reportedClean Method: Not reportedPSI Status: Not reportedRank Status: 0Brownfield Status: 6/23/2009Updated Date: 3/1/1988Entered Date: 1Ecology Status Code: NorthwestRegion: Not reportedFacility Type: 2128Facility ID: CSCSL: 4540 ft. 0.860 mi. Relative: Lower Actual: 315 ft. 1/2-1 RENTON, WA 98056 SSE ALLSITESNE 3RD ST / NE 4TH ST N/A 32 CSCSLRENTON HIGHLANDS LANDFILL S102258295 TC2826208.2s Page 105 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation Not reportedInteraction End Date: 1/1/1900Interaction Start Date: Not reportedFederal Program Indentifier: AInteraction Status: State Cleanup SiteInteraction (Aka Env Int) Description: SCSInteraction (Aka Env Int) Type Code: 2128Geographic Location Identifier (Alias Facid): NLocation Verified Code: 99Coordinate Point Geographic Position Code: 12Horizontal Accuracy Code: 99Coordinate Point Areal Extent Code: -122.18074900000001Longitude Decimal Degrees: 47.486305000000002Latitude Decimal Degrees: RENTON HIGHLANDS LANDFILLFacility Name: 2128Geographic location identifier (alias facid): -122.18074900000001Longitude: 47.486305000000002Latitude: 2128Facility Id: ALLSITES: Awaiting SHAEcology Site Status (MTCA cleanup process): Not reportedOther Deleterious Substance Group: Not reportedWood Debris Contaminant Group: Not reportedBioassay/Benthic Failures Contaminant Group: Not reportedTibutyl Tin Contaminant Group: SuspectedConventional Contaminants, Inorganic: SuspectedConventional Contaminants, Organic: Not reportedPolynuclear Aromatic Hydrocarbons (PAH): Not reportedPolychlorinated biPhenyls (PCBs): Not reportedMetals - Other non-priority pollutant medals: Not reportedEPA Priority Pollutants - Metals and Cyanide: Not reportedHalogenated Organic Compounds: Not reportedBase/Neutral/Acid Organics: Not reportedNon-Halogenated Solvents: RENTON HIGHLANDS LANDFILL (Continued) S102258295 Quality Programs. Quality, Dam Safety, Hazardous Waste, Toxics Cleanup, and Water facility/site that is currently, or has been, of interest to the Air Department of Ecology. This system contains key information for each means to query and display data maintained by the Washington Washington Facility / Site Identification System (WA-FSIS) provides a Environmental Interest/Information System 110015386893Registry ID: FINDS: 4950 ft. 0.937 mi.VCP Relative: Higher Actual: 400 ft. 1/2-1 ALLSITESRENTON, WA 98059 ENE CSCSL4101 NE SUNSET BLVD N/A 33 FINDSLEARNING CENTER 1007062156 TC2826208.2s Page 106 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation -122.165972Longitude Decimal Degrees: 47.503622Latitude Decimal Degrees: LEARNING CENTERFacility Name: 97265776Geographic location identifier (alias facid): -122.165972Longitude: 47.503622Latitude: 97265776Facility Id: ALLSITES: RA in ProgressEcology Site Status (MTCA cleanup process): Not reportedOther Deleterious Substance Group: Not reportedWood Debris Contaminant Group: Not reportedBioassay/Benthic Failures Contaminant Group: Not reportedTibutyl Tin Contaminant Group: Not reportedConventional Contaminants, Inorganic: Not reportedConventional Contaminants, Organic: Not reportedPolynuclear Aromatic Hydrocarbons (PAH): Not reportedPolychlorinated biPhenyls (PCBs): Not reportedMetals - Other non-priority pollutant medals: Below Cleanup LevelEPA Priority Pollutants - Metals and Cyanide: Not reportedHalogenated Organic Compounds: Not reportedBase/Neutral/Acid Organics: Not reportedNon-Halogenated Solvents: Not reportedDioxin: Not reportedUXO Code: Not reportedMTBE Code: Not reportedArsenic Code: NORTHWESTResponsible Unit: Not reportedAsbestos: Not reportedRadioactive Wastes: Not reportedCorrosive Wastes: Not reportedReactive Wastes: Not reportedPhenolic Compounds: ConfirmedPetroleum Products: Not reportedPesticides: ConfirmedAffected Media Status: SoilAffected Media: 1/1/0001Media Status Desc: 47 30 13.039 / -122 9 57.499Lat/Long (dms): 47.503622 / -122.165972Lat/Long: -122.165972Longitude: 47.503622Latitude: Not reportedAcres Remediated: Not reportedCleanup Standard: Not reportedDrinking Water Type: Not reportedClean Method: Not reportedPSI Status: Not reportedRank Status: 0Brownfield Status: 3/31/2010Updated Date: 7/12/2004Entered Date: 3Ecology Status Code: NorthwestRegion: VCPFacility Type: 97265776Facility ID: CSCSL: LEARNING CENTER (Continued)1007062156 TC2826208.2s Page 107 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation RA in ProgressRank: RA in ProgressDate NFA: RA in ProgressNFA Type: RA in ProgressEcology Status: Not reportedVCP: VCPVCP Status: 97265776Facility ID: 98059-4015edr_zip: KINGedr_fcnty: 98059-4015edr_fzip: WAedr_fstat: VCP: 8/20/2002Interaction End Date: 4/29/1998Interaction Start Date: 8481Federal Program Indentifier: IInteraction Status: LUST FacilityInteraction (Aka Env Int) Description: LUSTInteraction (Aka Env Int) Type Code: 97265776Geographic Location Identifier (Alias Facid): 1/29/1998Interaction End Date: 10/1/1967Interaction Start Date: 8481Federal Program Indentifier: IInteraction Status: Underground Storage TankInteraction (Aka Env Int) Description: USTInteraction (Aka Env Int) Type Code: 97265776Geographic Location Identifier (Alias Facid): Not reportedInteraction End Date: 7/12/2004Interaction Start Date: NW1292Federal Program Indentifier: AInteraction Status: Voluntary Cleanup SitesInteraction (Aka Env Int) Description: VOLCLNSTInteraction (Aka Env Int) Type Code: 97265776Geographic Location Identifier (Alias Facid): NLocation Verified Code: 5Coordinate Point Geographic Position Code: 6Horizontal Accuracy Code: 4Coordinate Point Areal Extent Code: LEARNING CENTER (Continued)1007062156 TC2826208.2s Page 108 TC2826208.2s Page 109RENTON1010337890WA ECY SUNSET SPILL2621 NE SUNSET AVE98056RCRA-NonGen, ALLSITESRENTON1007692374WA ECY SUNSET SPILL2621 NE SUNSET AVE98056FINDSRENTON1012277348SUNSET MATERIALS INC RENTON18011 RENTON ISSAQUAH RD SE98056FINDSRENTONS110037063SUNSET MATERIALS INC RENTON18011 RENTON ISSAQUAH RD SE98056ALLSITES, NPDESRENTONS110040834RENTON SERVICE CENTER915 S GRADY WAY COMPLEX98055CSCSL, ALLSITESRENTON1001600461WA DOT BRIDGE 90020SR 900 MP 10.72 TO MP 10.7598056RCRA-NonGen, FINDS, ALLSITESRENTONS109552832WA DOT I405 I5 TO SR 169I 405 I5 TO SR 169ALLSITESMAPLE VALLEYU000924330MAPLE VALLEY BP26821 MAPLE VALLEY HWY98665USTKING COUNTY COUNTYS105806019FALL CITY ABANDONED LANDFILLOLD DUMP RD. AT FIRST ROAD BENDSWF/LFKING COUNTY COUNTYS105806036HOUGHTON ABANDONED LANDFILLEAST OF I-405, IMMEDIATELY NORTH OF BRIDAL TRAILSSWF/LFKING COUNTY COUNTYS105806030SKYKOMISHNORTH OF THE STEPHEN’S PASS HIGHWAY JUST EAST OF SSWF/LFKING COUNTY COUNTYS105806016EASTGATE ABANDONED LANDFILLNORTHEAST OF 156TH AVE. S.E. AND I-90, NORTH END OSWF/LFKING COUNTY COUNTYS105806015CORLISS LANDFILLNORTHEAST OF CORLISS AVE. N. AND N. 163RD STREETSWF/LFPARK)KING COUNTY COUNTYS105806022KENT ABANDONED LANDFILL (MILL CREEK CANYONNORTHEAST OF MAPLE ST. AND TILDEN AVENUESWF/LFKING COUNTY COUNTYS105806020H.H. OLESONNORTHEAST OF N.E. 172ND ST. AND 152 PL. N.E.SWF/LFKING COUNTY COUNTYS105806013BOW LAKENORTHEAST OF S. 188TH ST. AND INTERSTATE-5SWF/LFKING COUNTY COUNTYS105806026PUYALLUP/KIT CORNERNORTHEAST OF S. 360TH ST. AND INTERSTATE-5SWF/LFKING COUNTY COUNTYS105806018FACTORIA PIT (SUNSET RAVINE PARK)NORTHWEST OF 135TH AVE S.E. AND S.E. 40TH STREETSWF/LFKING COUNTY COUNTYS105806012AUBURN (ROTARY PARK SITE)NORTHWEST OF 27TH STREET S.E. AND ALPINE ST. S.E.SWF/LFKING COUNTY COUNTYS105806014CARTON & BORTHNORTHWEST OF 71ST AVE. N.E. AND N.E. 186TH STREETSWF/LFKING COUNTY COUNTYS105806021HOUGHTONNORTHWEST OF N.E. 60TH ST. AND 120TH AVE. N.E.SWF/LFKING COUNTY COUNTYS105806011AUBURN (M & R STREET SITE)NORTHWEST OF R STREET AND 25TH STREET S.E.SWF/LFKING COUNTY COUNTYS105806025PACIFIC CITYSOUTH OF 3RD AVE. S.E. AT THE WHITE RIVERSWF/LFKING COUNTY COUNTYS105806032TUKWILASOUTH OF 62ND AVE. S. AND S. 151ST STREETSWF/LFKING COUNTY COUNTYS105806017ENUMCLAWSOUTHEAST OF 284TH AVE. S.E. AND S.E. 448TH STREETSWF/LFKING COUNTY COUNTYS105806031SUNSET PARKSOUTHWEST OF 18TH AVE. S. AND S. 136TH STREETSWF/LFKING COUNTY COUNTYS105806028RENTON HIGHLANDSSOUTHWEST OF N.E. 3RD ST. AND JEFFERSON AVENUE N.ESWF/LFKING COUNTY COUNTYS105806027REDONDO PITSOUTHWEST OF S. DASH POINT ROAD AND PACIFIC HIGHWASWF/LFKING COUNTY COUNTYS105806033VASHON ISLANDWEST OF 130TH AVE. S.W. ACROSS FROM THE PRESENT LASWF/LFKING COUNTY COUNTYS105806024NORTH BENDWEST OF THE MIDDLE FORK ROAD, ABOUT 1 MILE NORTH OSWF/LFKING COUNTY COUNTYS105806037PUYALLUP/KIT CORNER ABANDONED LANDFILLIMMEDIATELY EAST OF I-5 JUST SOUTH OF THE HIGHWAYSWF/LFKING COUNTY COUNTYS105806034BOW LAKE ABANDONED LANDFILLIMMEDIATELY EAST OF I-5, ACROSS FROM SOUTH 188TH SSWF/LFKING COUNTY COUNTYS105806035CORLISS ABANDONED LANDFILLIMMEDIATELY WEST OF I-5 BETWEEN NORTH 163RD PLACESWF/LFKING COUNTY COUNTYS105806029RENTON JUNCTION (MONSTER ROAD)BETWEEN MONSTER ROAD AND THE GREEN RIVERSWF/LFKING COUNTY COUNTYS105806023MCMICKEN HEIGHTSBETWEEN THE S. 175TH ST. DEAD-END AND INTERSTATE-5SWF/LFKING COUNTYS108107942WASTE MOBILE COLLECTIONSMOVES LOCATIONS (SEE COMMENT FIELD)SWF/LFHAZELS109556210WA DOT HAZELSR 530 MP 39.198241ALLSITESORPHAN SUMMARYCityEDR IDSite NameSite AddressZipDatabase(s) To maintain currency of the following federal and state databases, EDR contacts the appropriate governmental agency on a monthly or quarterly basis, as required. Number of Days to Update:Provides confirmation that EDR is reporting records that have been updated within 90 days from the date the government agency made the information available to the public. STANDARD ENVIRONMENTAL RECORDS Federal NPL site list NPL: National Priority List National Priorities List (Superfund). The NPL is a subset of CERCLIS and identifies over 1,200 sites for priority cleanup under the Superfund Program. NPL sites may encompass relatively large areas. As such, EDR provides polygon coverage for over 1,000 NPL site boundaries produced by EPA’s Environmental Photographic Interpretation Center (EPIC) and regional EPA offices. Date of Government Version: 03/31/2010 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 04/02/2010 Date Made Active in Reports: 04/12/2010 Number of Days to Update: 10 Source: EPA Telephone: N/A Last EDR Contact: 07/14/2010 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 10/25/2010 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly NPL Site Boundaries Sources: EPA’s Environmental Photographic Interpretation Center (EPIC) Telephone: 202-564-7333 EPA Region 1 EPA Region 6 Telephone 617-918-1143 Telephone: 214-655-6659 EPA Region 3 EPA Region 7 Telephone 215-814-5418 Telephone: 913-551-7247 EPA Region 4 EPA Region 8 Telephone 404-562-8033 Telephone: 303-312-6774 EPA Region 5 EPA Region 9 Telephone 312-886-6686 Telephone: 415-947-4246 EPA Region 10 Telephone 206-553-8665 Proposed NPL: Proposed National Priority List Sites A site that has been proposed for listing on the National Priorities List through the issuance of a proposed rule in the Federal Register. EPA then accepts public comments on the site, responds to the comments, and places on the NPL those sites that continue to meet the requirements for listing. Date of Government Version: 03/31/2010 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 04/02/2010 Date Made Active in Reports: 04/12/2010 Number of Days to Update: 10 Source: EPA Telephone: N/A Last EDR Contact: 07/14/2010 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 10/25/2010 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly NPL LIENS: Federal Superfund Liens Federal Superfund Liens. Under the authority granted the USEPA by CERCLA of 1980, the USEPA has the authority to file liens against real property in order to recover remedial action expenditures or when the property owner received notification of potential liability. USEPA compiles a listing of filed notices of Superfund Liens. Date of Government Version: 10/15/1991 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 02/02/1994 Date Made Active in Reports: 03/30/1994 Number of Days to Update: 56 Source: EPA Telephone: 202-564-4267 Last EDR Contact: 05/17/2010 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 08/30/2010 Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned TC2826208.2s Page GR-1 GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING Federal Delisted NPL site list DELISTED NPL: National Priority List Deletions The National Oil and Hazardous Substances Pollution Contingency Plan (NCP) establishes the criteria that the EPA uses to delete sites from the NPL. In accordance with 40 CFR 300.425.(e), sites may be deleted from the NPL where no further response is appropriate. Date of Government Version: 03/31/2010 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 04/02/2010 Date Made Active in Reports: 04/12/2010 Number of Days to Update: 10 Source: EPA Telephone: N/A Last EDR Contact: 07/14/2010 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 10/25/2010 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly Federal CERCLIS list CERCLIS: Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Information System CERCLIS contains data on potentially hazardous waste sites that have been reported to the USEPA by states, municipalities, private companies and private persons, pursuant to Section 103 of the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act (CERCLA). CERCLIS contains sites which are either proposed to or on the National Priorities List (NPL) and sites which are in the screening and assessment phase for possible inclusion on the NPL. Date of Government Version: 01/29/2010 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 02/09/2010 Date Made Active in Reports: 04/12/2010 Number of Days to Update: 62 Source: EPA Telephone: 703-412-9810 Last EDR Contact: 07/12/2010 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 10/11/2010 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly FEDERAL FACILITY: Federal Facility Site Information listing A listing of National Priority List (NPL) and Base Realignment and Closure (BRAC) sites found in the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liability Information System (CERCLIS) Database where EPAa??s Federal Facilities Restoration and Reuse Office is involved in cleanup activities. Date of Government Version: 06/23/2009 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 01/15/2010 Date Made Active in Reports: 02/10/2010 Number of Days to Update: 26 Source: Environmental Protection Agency Telephone: 703-603-8704 Last EDR Contact: 07/21/2010 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 10/25/2010 Data Release Frequency: Varies Federal CERCLIS NFRAP site List CERCLIS-NFRAP: CERCLIS No Further Remedial Action Planned Archived sites are sites that have been removed and archived from the inventory of CERCLIS sites. Archived status indicates that, to the best of EPA’s knowledge, assessment at a site has been completed and that EPA has determined no further steps will be taken to list this site on the National Priorities List (NPL), unless information indicates this decision was not appropriate or other considerations require a recommendation for listing at a later time. This decision does not necessarily mean that there is no hazard associated with a given site; it only means that, based upon available information, the location is not judged to be a potential NPL site. Date of Government Version: 06/23/2009 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 09/02/2009 Date Made Active in Reports: 09/21/2009 Number of Days to Update: 19 Source: EPA Telephone: 703-412-9810 Last EDR Contact: 07/12/2010 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 09/13/2010 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly Federal RCRA CORRACTS facilities list CORRACTS: Corrective Action Report CORRACTS identifies hazardous waste handlers with RCRA corrective action activity. TC2826208.2s Page GR-2 GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING Date of Government Version: 03/25/2010 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 03/31/2010 Date Made Active in Reports: 05/27/2010 Number of Days to Update: 57 Source: EPA Telephone: 800-424-9346 Last EDR Contact: 05/17/2010 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 08/30/2010 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly Federal RCRA non-CORRACTS TSD facilities list RCRA-TSDF: RCRA - Treatment, Storage and Disposal RCRAInfo is EPA’s comprehensive information system, providing access to data supporting the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) of 1976 and the Hazardous and Solid Waste Amendments (HSWA) of 1984. The database includes selective information on sites which generate, transport, store, treat and/or dispose of hazardous waste as defined by the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA). Transporters are individuals or entities that move hazardous waste from the generator offsite to a facility that can recycle, treat, store, or dispose of the waste. TSDFs treat, store, or dispose of the waste. Date of Government Version: 02/17/2010 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 02/19/2010 Date Made Active in Reports: 05/17/2010 Number of Days to Update: 87 Source: Environmental Protection Agency Telephone: (206) 553-1200 Last EDR Contact: 07/09/2010 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 10/18/2010 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly Federal RCRA generators list RCRA-LQG: RCRA - Large Quantity Generators RCRAInfo is EPA’s comprehensive information system, providing access to data supporting the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) of 1976 and the Hazardous and Solid Waste Amendments (HSWA) of 1984. The database includes selective information on sites which generate, transport, store, treat and/or dispose of hazardous waste as defined by the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA). Large quantity generators (LQGs) generate over 1,000 kilograms (kg) of hazardous waste, or over 1 kg of acutely hazardous waste per month. Date of Government Version: 02/17/2010 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 02/19/2010 Date Made Active in Reports: 05/17/2010 Number of Days to Update: 87 Source: Environmental Protection Agency Telephone: (206) 553-1200 Last EDR Contact: 07/09/2010 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 10/18/2010 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly RCRA-SQG: RCRA - Small Quantity Generators RCRAInfo is EPA’s comprehensive information system, providing access to data supporting the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) of 1976 and the Hazardous and Solid Waste Amendments (HSWA) of 1984. The database includes selective information on sites which generate, transport, store, treat and/or dispose of hazardous waste as defined by the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA). Small quantity generators (SQGs) generate between 100 kg and 1,000 kg of hazardous waste per month. Date of Government Version: 02/17/2010 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 02/19/2010 Date Made Active in Reports: 05/17/2010 Number of Days to Update: 87 Source: Environmental Protection Agency Telephone: (206) 553-1200 Last EDR Contact: 07/09/2010 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 10/18/2010 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly RCRA-CESQG: RCRA - Conditionally Exempt Small Quantity Generators RCRAInfo is EPA’s comprehensive information system, providing access to data supporting the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) of 1976 and the Hazardous and Solid Waste Amendments (HSWA) of 1984. The database includes selective information on sites which generate, transport, store, treat and/or dispose of hazardous waste as defined by the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA). Conditionally exempt small quantity generators (CESQGs) generate less than 100 kg of hazardous waste, or less than 1 kg of acutely hazardous waste per month. Date of Government Version: 02/17/2010 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 02/19/2010 Date Made Active in Reports: 05/17/2010 Number of Days to Update: 87 Source: Environmental Protection Agency Telephone: (206) 553-1200 Last EDR Contact: 07/09/2010 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 10/18/2010 Data Release Frequency: Varies TC2826208.2s Page GR-3 GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING Federal institutional controls / engineering controls registries US ENG CONTROLS: Engineering Controls Sites List A listing of sites with engineering controls in place. Engineering controls include various forms of caps, building foundations, liners, and treatment methods to create pathway elimination for regulated substances to enter environmental media or effect human health. Date of Government Version: 12/20/2009 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 01/20/2010 Date Made Active in Reports: 04/12/2010 Number of Days to Update: 82 Source: Environmental Protection Agency Telephone: 703-603-0695 Last EDR Contact: 06/14/2010 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 09/27/2010 Data Release Frequency: Varies US INST CONTROL: Sites with Institutional Controls A listing of sites with institutional controls in place. Institutional controls include administrative measures, such as groundwater use restrictions, construction restrictions, property use restrictions, and post remediation care requirements intended to prevent exposure to contaminants remaining on site. Deed restrictions are generally required as part of the institutional controls. Date of Government Version: 12/20/2009 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 01/20/2010 Date Made Active in Reports: 04/12/2010 Number of Days to Update: 82 Source: Environmental Protection Agency Telephone: 703-603-0695 Last EDR Contact: 06/14/2010 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 09/27/2010 Data Release Frequency: Varies Federal ERNS list ERNS: Emergency Response Notification System Emergency Response Notification System. ERNS records and stores information on reported releases of oil and hazardous substances. Date of Government Version: 12/31/2009 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 01/22/2010 Date Made Active in Reports: 02/11/2010 Number of Days to Update: 20 Source: National Response Center, United States Coast Guard Telephone: 202-267-2180 Last EDR Contact: 07/09/2010 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 10/18/2010 Data Release Frequency: Annually State- and tribal - equivalent NPL HSL: Hazardous Sites List The Hazardous Sites List is a subset of the CSCSL Report. It includes sites which have been assessed and ranked using the Washington Ranking Method (WARM). Date of Government Version: 02/17/2010 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 02/19/2010 Date Made Active in Reports: 02/24/2010 Number of Days to Update: 5 Source: Department of Ecology Telephone: 360-407-7200 Last EDR Contact: 05/18/2010 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 08/30/2010 Data Release Frequency: Semi-Annually State- and tribal - equivalent CERCLIS CSCSL: Confirmed and Suspected Contaminated Sites List State Hazardous Waste Sites. State hazardous waste site records are the states’ equivalent to CERCLIS. These sites may or may not already be listed on the federal CERCLIS list. Priority sites planned for cleanup using state funds (state equivalent of Superfund) are identified along with sites where cleanup will be paid for by potentially responsible parties. Available information varies by state. Date of Government Version: 04/26/2010 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 04/29/2010 Date Made Active in Reports: 05/19/2010 Number of Days to Update: 20 Source: Department of Ecology Telephone: 360-407-7200 Last EDR Contact: 07/28/2010 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 11/08/2010 Data Release Frequency: Semi-Annually TC2826208.2s Page GR-4 GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING State and tribal landfill and/or solid waste disposal site lists SWF/LF: Solid Waste Facility Database Solid Waste Facilities/Landfill Sites. SWF/LF type records typically contain an inventory of solid waste disposal facilities or landfills in a particular state. Depending on the state, these may be active or inactive facilities or open dumps that failed to meet RCRA Subtitle D Section 4004 criteria for solid waste landfills or disposal sites. Date of Government Version: 06/15/2010 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 06/16/2010 Date Made Active in Reports: 07/15/2010 Number of Days to Update: 29 Source: Department of Ecology Telephone: 360-407-6132 Last EDR Contact: 06/14/2010 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 09/27/2010 Data Release Frequency: Annually State and tribal leaking storage tank lists LUST: Leaking Underground Storage Tanks Site List Leaking Underground Storage Tank Incident Reports. LUST records contain an inventory of reported leaking underground storage tank incidents. Not all states maintain these records, and the information stored varies by state. Date of Government Version: 05/24/2010 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 05/26/2010 Date Made Active in Reports: 05/28/2010 Number of Days to Update: 2 Source: Department of Ecology Telephone: 360-407-7183 Last EDR Contact: 05/26/2010 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 09/06/2010 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly INDIAN LUST R9: Leaking Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land LUSTs on Indian land in Arizona, California, New Mexico and Nevada Date of Government Version: 02/01/2010 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 03/03/2010 Date Made Active in Reports: 04/12/2010 Number of Days to Update: 40 Source: Environmental Protection Agency Telephone: 415-972-3372 Last EDR Contact: 05/03/2010 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 08/16/2010 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly INDIAN LUST R4: Leaking Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land LUSTs on Indian land in Florida, Mississippi and North Carolina. Date of Government Version: 03/10/2010 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 03/16/2010 Date Made Active in Reports: 04/12/2010 Number of Days to Update: 27 Source: EPA Region 4 Telephone: 404-562-8677 Last EDR Contact: 05/03/2010 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 08/16/2010 Data Release Frequency: Semi-Annually INDIAN LUST R10: Leaking Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land LUSTs on Indian land in Alaska, Idaho, Oregon and Washington. Date of Government Version: 05/04/2010 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 05/05/2010 Date Made Active in Reports: 05/27/2010 Number of Days to Update: 22 Source: EPA Region 10 Telephone: 206-553-2857 Last EDR Contact: 05/03/2010 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 08/16/2010 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly INDIAN LUST R1: Leaking Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land A listing of leaking underground storage tank locations on Indian Land. Date of Government Version: 02/19/2009 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 02/19/2009 Date Made Active in Reports: 03/16/2009 Number of Days to Update: 25 Source: EPA Region 1 Telephone: 617-918-1313 Last EDR Contact: 05/03/2010 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 08/16/2010 Data Release Frequency: Varies TC2826208.2s Page GR-5 GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING INDIAN LUST R6: Leaking Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land LUSTs on Indian land in New Mexico and Oklahoma. Date of Government Version: 05/03/2010 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 05/05/2010 Date Made Active in Reports: 05/27/2010 Number of Days to Update: 22 Source: EPA Region 6 Telephone: 214-665-6597 Last EDR Contact: 05/03/2010 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 08/16/2010 Data Release Frequency: Varies INDIAN LUST R7: Leaking Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land LUSTs on Indian land in Iowa, Kansas, and Nebraska Date of Government Version: 11/04/2009 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 05/04/2010 Date Made Active in Reports: 07/07/2010 Number of Days to Update: 64 Source: EPA Region 7 Telephone: 913-551-7003 Last EDR Contact: 05/04/2010 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 08/16/2010 Data Release Frequency: Varies INDIAN LUST R8: Leaking Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land LUSTs on Indian land in Colorado, Montana, North Dakota, South Dakota, Utah and Wyoming. Date of Government Version: 02/25/2010 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 02/25/2010 Date Made Active in Reports: 04/12/2010 Number of Days to Update: 46 Source: EPA Region 8 Telephone: 303-312-6271 Last EDR Contact: 05/03/2010 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 08/16/2010 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly State and tribal registered storage tank lists UST: Underground Storage Tank Database Registered Underground Storage Tanks. UST’s are regulated under Subtitle I of the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) and must be registered with the state department responsible for administering the UST program. Available information varies by state program. Date of Government Version: 05/24/2010 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 05/26/2010 Date Made Active in Reports: 05/28/2010 Number of Days to Update: 2 Source: Department of Ecology Telephone: 360-407-7183 Last EDR Contact: 05/26/2010 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 09/06/2010 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly AST: Aboveground Storage Tank Locations A listing of aboveground storage tank locations regulated by the Department of Ecology’s Spill Prevention, Preparedness and Response Program. Date of Government Version: 05/27/2009 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 05/28/2009 Date Made Active in Reports: 06/19/2009 Number of Days to Update: 22 Source: Department of Ecology Telephone: 360-407-7562 Last EDR Contact: 05/10/2010 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 08/23/2010 Data Release Frequency: Varies INDIAN UST R4: Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land The Indian Underground Storage Tank (UST) database provides information about underground storage tanks on Indian land in EPA Region 4 (Alabama, Florida, Georgia, Kentucky, Mississippi, North Carolina, South Carolina, Tennessee and Tribal Nations) Date of Government Version: 03/10/2010 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 03/16/2010 Date Made Active in Reports: 04/12/2010 Number of Days to Update: 27 Source: EPA Region 4 Telephone: 404-562-9424 Last EDR Contact: 05/03/2010 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 08/16/2010 Data Release Frequency: Semi-Annually TC2826208.2s Page GR-6 GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING INDIAN UST R9: Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land The Indian Underground Storage Tank (UST) database provides information about underground storage tanks on Indian land in EPA Region 9 (Arizona, California, Hawaii, Nevada, the Pacific Islands, and Tribal Nations). Date of Government Version: 02/01/2010 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 03/03/2010 Date Made Active in Reports: 04/12/2010 Number of Days to Update: 40 Source: EPA Region 9 Telephone: 415-972-3368 Last EDR Contact: 05/03/2010 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 08/16/2010 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly INDIAN UST R8: Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land The Indian Underground Storage Tank (UST) database provides information about underground storage tanks on Indian land in EPA Region 8 (Colorado, Montana, North Dakota, South Dakota, Utah, Wyoming and 27 Tribal Nations). Date of Government Version: 02/25/2010 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 02/25/2010 Date Made Active in Reports: 04/12/2010 Number of Days to Update: 46 Source: EPA Region 8 Telephone: 303-312-6137 Last EDR Contact: 05/03/2010 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 08/16/2010 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly INDIAN UST R10: Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land The Indian Underground Storage Tank (UST) database provides information about underground storage tanks on Indian land in EPA Region 10 (Alaska, Idaho, Oregon, Washington, and Tribal Nations). Date of Government Version: 05/04/2010 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 05/05/2010 Date Made Active in Reports: 05/27/2010 Number of Days to Update: 22 Source: EPA Region 10 Telephone: 206-553-2857 Last EDR Contact: 05/03/2010 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 08/16/2010 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly INDIAN UST R1: Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land The Indian Underground Storage Tank (UST) database provides information about underground storage tanks on Indian land in EPA Region 1 (Connecticut, Maine, Massachusetts, New Hampshire, Rhode Island, Vermont and ten Tribal Nations). Date of Government Version: 02/19/2009 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 02/19/2009 Date Made Active in Reports: 03/16/2009 Number of Days to Update: 25 Source: EPA, Region 1 Telephone: 617-918-1313 Last EDR Contact: 05/03/2010 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 08/16/2010 Data Release Frequency: Varies INDIAN UST R5: Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land The Indian Underground Storage Tank (UST) database provides information about underground storage tanks on Indian land in EPA Region 5 (Michigan, Minnesota and Wisconsin and Tribal Nations). Date of Government Version: 02/11/2010 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 02/11/2010 Date Made Active in Reports: 04/12/2010 Number of Days to Update: 60 Source: EPA Region 5 Telephone: 312-886-6136 Last EDR Contact: 05/03/2010 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 08/16/2010 Data Release Frequency: Varies INDIAN UST R6: Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land The Indian Underground Storage Tank (UST) database provides information about underground storage tanks on Indian land in EPA Region 6 (Louisiana, Arkansas, Oklahoma, New Mexico, Texas and 65 Tribes). Date of Government Version: 05/03/2010 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 05/05/2010 Date Made Active in Reports: 05/27/2010 Number of Days to Update: 22 Source: EPA Region 6 Telephone: 214-665-7591 Last EDR Contact: 05/03/2010 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 08/16/2010 Data Release Frequency: Semi-Annually TC2826208.2s Page GR-7 GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING INDIAN UST R7: Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land The Indian Underground Storage Tank (UST) database provides information about underground storage tanks on Indian land in EPA Region 7 (Iowa, Kansas, Missouri, Nebraska, and 9 Tribal Nations). Date of Government Version: 04/01/2008 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 12/30/2008 Date Made Active in Reports: 03/16/2009 Number of Days to Update: 76 Source: EPA Region 7 Telephone: 913-551-7003 Last EDR Contact: 05/12/2010 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 08/16/2010 Data Release Frequency: Varies FEMA UST: Underground Storage Tank Listing A listing of all FEMA owned underground storage tanks. Date of Government Version: 01/01/2010 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 02/16/2010 Date Made Active in Reports: 04/12/2010 Number of Days to Update: 55 Source: FEMA Telephone: 202-646-5797 Last EDR Contact: 07/19/2010 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 11/01/2010 Data Release Frequency: Varies State and tribal institutional control / engineering control registries INST CONTROL: Institutional Control Site List Sites that have institutional controls. Date of Government Version: 05/18/2010 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 05/18/2010 Date Made Active in Reports: 05/28/2010 Number of Days to Update: 10 Source: Department of Ecology Telephone: 360-407-7170 Last EDR Contact: 05/18/2010 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 08/30/2010 Data Release Frequency: Varies State and tribal voluntary cleanup sites INDIAN VCP R1: Voluntary Cleanup Priority Listing A listing of voluntary cleanup priority sites located on Indian Land located in Region 1. Date of Government Version: 04/02/2008 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 04/22/2008 Date Made Active in Reports: 05/19/2008 Number of Days to Update: 27 Source: EPA, Region 1 Telephone: 617-918-1102 Last EDR Contact: 07/08/2010 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 10/18/2010 Data Release Frequency: Varies VCP: Voluntary Cleanup Program Sites Sites that have entered either the Voluntary Cleanup Program or its predecessor Independent Remedial Action Program. Date of Government Version: 04/22/2010 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 04/30/2010 Date Made Active in Reports: 05/19/2010 Number of Days to Update: 19 Source: Department of Ecology Telephone: 360-407-7200 Last EDR Contact: 07/27/2010 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 11/08/2010 Data Release Frequency: Varies INDIAN VCP R7: Voluntary Cleanup Priority Lisitng A listing of voluntary cleanup priority sites located on Indian Land located in Region 7. Date of Government Version: 03/20/2008 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 04/22/2008 Date Made Active in Reports: 05/19/2008 Number of Days to Update: 27 Source: EPA, Region 7 Telephone: 913-551-7365 Last EDR Contact: 04/20/2009 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 07/20/2009 Data Release Frequency: Varies TC2826208.2s Page GR-8 GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING ICR: Independent Cleanup Reports These are remedial action reports Ecology has received from either the owner or operator of the sites. These actions have been conducted without department oversight or approval and are not under an order or decree. This database is no longer updated by the Department of Ecology. Date of Government Version: 12/01/2002 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 01/03/2003 Date Made Active in Reports: 01/22/2003 Number of Days to Update: 19 Source: Department of Ecology Telephone: 360-407-7200 Last EDR Contact: 08/10/2009 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 11/09/2009 Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned State and tribal Brownfields sites BROWNFIELDS: Brownfields Sites Listing A listing of brownfields sites included in the Confirmed & Suspected Sites Listing. Brownfields are abandoned, idle or underused commercial or industrial properties, where the expansion or redevelopment is hindered by real or perceived contamination. Brownfields vary in size, location, age, and past use -- they can be anything from a five-hundred acre automobile assembly plant to a small, abandoned corner gas station. Date of Government Version: 04/26/2010 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 04/29/2010 Date Made Active in Reports: 05/19/2010 Number of Days to Update: 20 Source: Department of Ecology Telephone: 360-725-4030 Last EDR Contact: 07/28/2010 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 11/08/2010 Data Release Frequency: Varies ADDITIONAL ENVIRONMENTAL RECORDS Local Brownfield lists US BROWNFIELDS: A Listing of Brownfields Sites Included in the listing are brownfields properties addresses by Cooperative Agreement Recipients and brownfields properties addressed by Targeted Brownfields Assessments. Targeted Brownfields Assessments-EPA’s Targeted Brownfields Assessments (TBA) program is designed to help states, tribes, and municipalities--especially those without EPA Brownfields Assessment Demonstration Pilots--minimize the uncertainties of contamination often associated with brownfields. Under the TBA program, EPA provides funding and/or technical assistance for environmental assessments at brownfields sites throughout the country. Targeted Brownfields Assessments supplement and work with other efforts under EPA’s Brownfields Initiative to promote cleanup and redevelopment of brownfields. Cooperative Agreement Recipients-States, political subdivisions, territories, and Indian tribes become Brownfields Cleanup Revolving Loan Fund (BCRLF) cooperative agreement recipients when they enter into BCRLF cooperative agreements with the U.S. EPA. EPA selects BCRLF cooperative agreement recipients based on a proposal and application process. BCRLF cooperative agreement recipients must use EPA funds provided through BCRLF cooperative agreement for specified brownfields-related cleanup activities. Date of Government Version: 03/02/2010 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 03/23/2010 Date Made Active in Reports: 05/17/2010 Number of Days to Update: 55 Source: Environmental Protection Agency Telephone: 202-566-2777 Last EDR Contact: 06/25/2010 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 10/11/2010 Data Release Frequency: Semi-Annually Local Lists of Landfill / Solid Waste Disposal Sites DEBRIS REGION 9: Torres Martinez Reservation Illegal Dump Site Locations A listing of illegal dump sites location on the Torres Martinez Indian Reservation located in eastern Riverside County and northern Imperial County, California. Date of Government Version: 01/12/2009 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 05/07/2009 Date Made Active in Reports: 09/21/2009 Number of Days to Update: 137 Source: EPA, Region 9 Telephone: 415-947-4219 Last EDR Contact: 07/09/2010 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 09/20/2010 Data Release Frequency: Varies TC2826208.2s Page GR-9 GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING ODI: Open Dump Inventory An open dump is defined as a disposal facility that does not comply with one or more of the Part 257 or Part 258 Subtitle D Criteria. Date of Government Version: 06/30/1985 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 08/09/2004 Date Made Active in Reports: 09/17/2004 Number of Days to Update: 39 Source: Environmental Protection Agency Telephone: 800-424-9346 Last EDR Contact: 06/09/2004 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: N/A Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned SWTIRE: Solid Waste Tire Facilities This study identified sites statewide with unauthorized accumulations of scrap tires. Date of Government Version: 11/01/2005 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 03/16/2006 Date Made Active in Reports: 04/13/2006 Number of Days to Update: 28 Source: Department of Ecology Telephone: N/A Last EDR Contact: 06/17/2010 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 09/27/2010 Data Release Frequency: Varies INDIAN ODI: Report on the Status of Open Dumps on Indian Lands Location of open dumps on Indian land. Date of Government Version: 12/31/1998 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 12/03/2007 Date Made Active in Reports: 01/24/2008 Number of Days to Update: 52 Source: Environmental Protection Agency Telephone: 703-308-8245 Last EDR Contact: 06/08/2010 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 08/23/2010 Data Release Frequency: Varies Local Lists of Hazardous waste / Contaminated Sites US CDL: Clandestine Drug Labs A listing of clandestine drug lab locations. The U.S. Department of Justice ("the Department") provides this web site as a public service. It contains addresses of some locations where law enforcement agencies reported they found chemicals or other items that indicated the presence of either clandestine drug laboratories or dumpsites. In most cases, the source of the entries is not the Department, and the Department has not verified the entry and does not guarantee its accuracy. Members of the public must verify the accuracy of all entries by, for example, contacting local law enforcement and local health departments. Date of Government Version: 08/19/2009 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 12/29/2009 Date Made Active in Reports: 02/10/2010 Number of Days to Update: 43 Source: Drug Enforcement Administration Telephone: 202-307-1000 Last EDR Contact: 03/08/2010 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 09/20/2010 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly ALLSITES: Facility/Site Identification System Listing Information on facilities and sites of interest to the Department of Ecology. Date of Government Version: 05/12/2010 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 05/13/2010 Date Made Active in Reports: 05/19/2010 Number of Days to Update: 6 Source: Department of Ecology Telephone: 360-407-6423 Last EDR Contact: 05/12/2010 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 08/23/2010 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly CSCSL NFA: Confirmed and Contaminated Sites - No Further Action The data set contains information about sites previously on the Confirmed and Suspected Contaminated Sites list that have received a No Further Action (NFA) determination. Because it is necessary to maintain historical records of sites that have been investigated and cleaned up, sites are not deleted from the database when cleanup activities are completed. Instead, a No Further Action code is entered based upon the type of NFA determination the site received. TC2826208.2s Page GR-10 GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING Date of Government Version: 04/26/2010 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 04/29/2010 Date Made Active in Reports: 05/19/2010 Number of Days to Update: 20 Source: Department of Ecology Telephone: 360-407-7170 Last EDR Contact: 07/28/2010 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 11/08/2010 Data Release Frequency: Semi-Annually CDL: Clandestine Drug Lab Contaminated Site List Illegal methamphetamine labs use hazardous chemicals that create public health hazards. Chemicals and residues can cause burns, respiratory and neurological damage, and death. Biological hazards associated with intravenous needles, feces, and blood also pose health risks. Date of Government Version: 02/09/2009 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 03/18/2009 Date Made Active in Reports: 03/24/2009 Number of Days to Update: 6 Source: Department of Health Telephone: 360-236-3380 Last EDR Contact: 05/18/2010 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 08/30/2010 Data Release Frequency: Varies HIST CDL: List of Sites Contaminated by Clandestine Drug Labs This listing of contaminated sites by Clandestine Drug Labs includes non-remediated properties. The current CDL listing does not. This listing is no longer updated by the state agency. Date of Government Version: 02/08/2007 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 06/26/2007 Date Made Active in Reports: 07/19/2007 Number of Days to Update: 23 Source: Department of Health Telephone: 360-236-3381 Last EDR Contact: 06/02/2008 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 09/01/2008 Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned US HIST CDL: National Clandestine Laboratory Register A listing of clandestine drug lab locations. The U.S. Department of Justice ("the Department") provides this web site as a public service. It contains addresses of some locations where law enforcement agencies reported they found chemicals or other items that indicated the presence of either clandestine drug laboratories or dumpsites. In most cases, the source of the entries is not the Department, and the Department has not verified the entry and does not guarantee its accuracy. Members of the public must verify the accuracy of all entries by, for example, contacting local law enforcement and local health departments. Date of Government Version: 09/01/2007 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 11/19/2008 Date Made Active in Reports: 03/30/2009 Number of Days to Update: 131 Source: Drug Enforcement Administration Telephone: 202-307-1000 Last EDR Contact: 03/23/2009 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 06/22/2009 Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned Local Land Records LIENS 2: CERCLA Lien Information A Federal CERCLA (’Superfund’) lien can exist by operation of law at any site or property at which EPA has spent Superfund monies. These monies are spent to investigate and address releases and threatened releases of contamination. CERCLIS provides information as to the identity of these sites and properties. Date of Government Version: 02/05/2010 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 02/11/2010 Date Made Active in Reports: 04/12/2010 Number of Days to Update: 60 Source: Environmental Protection Agency Telephone: 202-564-6023 Last EDR Contact: 05/03/2010 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 08/16/2010 Data Release Frequency: Varies LUCIS: Land Use Control Information System LUCIS contains records of land use control information pertaining to the former Navy Base Realignment and Closure properties. Date of Government Version: 12/09/2005 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 12/11/2006 Date Made Active in Reports: 01/11/2007 Number of Days to Update: 31 Source: Department of the Navy Telephone: 843-820-7326 Last EDR Contact: 05/24/2010 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 09/06/2010 Data Release Frequency: Varies TC2826208.2s Page GR-11 GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING Records of Emergency Release Reports HMIRS: Hazardous Materials Information Reporting System Hazardous Materials Incident Report System. HMIRS contains hazardous material spill incidents reported to DOT. Date of Government Version: 04/06/2010 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 04/07/2010 Date Made Active in Reports: 05/27/2010 Number of Days to Update: 50 Source: U.S. Department of Transportation Telephone: 202-366-4555 Last EDR Contact: 07/09/2010 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 10/18/2010 Data Release Frequency: Annually SPILLS: Reported Spills Spills reported to the Spill Prevention, Preparedness and Response Division. Date of Government Version: 06/25/2010 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 06/25/2010 Date Made Active in Reports: 07/15/2010 Number of Days to Update: 20 Source: Department of Ecology Telephone: 360-407-6950 Last EDR Contact: 06/21/2010 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 09/27/2010 Data Release Frequency: Semi-Annually Other Ascertainable Records RCRA-NonGen: RCRA - Non Generators RCRAInfo is EPA’s comprehensive information system, providing access to data supporting the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) of 1976 and the Hazardous and Solid Waste Amendments (HSWA) of 1984. The database includes selective information on sites which generate, transport, store, treat and/or dispose of hazardous waste as defined by the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA). Non-Generators do not presently generate hazardous waste. Date of Government Version: 02/17/2010 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 02/19/2010 Date Made Active in Reports: 05/17/2010 Number of Days to Update: 87 Source: Environmental Protection Agency Telephone: (206) 553-1200 Last EDR Contact: 07/09/2010 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 10/18/2010 Data Release Frequency: Varies DOT OPS: Incident and Accident Data Department of Transporation, Office of Pipeline Safety Incident and Accident data. Date of Government Version: 01/12/2010 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 02/09/2010 Date Made Active in Reports: 04/12/2010 Number of Days to Update: 62 Source: Department of Transporation, Office of Pipeline Safety Telephone: 202-366-4595 Last EDR Contact: 05/12/2010 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 08/23/2010 Data Release Frequency: Varies DOD: Department of Defense Sites This data set consists of federally owned or administered lands, administered by the Department of Defense, that have any area equal to or greater than 640 acres of the United States, Puerto Rico, and the U.S. Virgin Islands. Date of Government Version: 12/31/2005 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 11/10/2006 Date Made Active in Reports: 01/11/2007 Number of Days to Update: 62 Source: USGS Telephone: 703-692-8801 Last EDR Contact: 07/22/2010 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 11/01/2010 Data Release Frequency: Semi-Annually FUDS: Formerly Used Defense Sites The listing includes locations of Formerly Used Defense Sites properties where the US Army Corps of Engineers is actively working or will take necessary cleanup actions. Date of Government Version: 12/31/2008 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 09/30/2009 Date Made Active in Reports: 12/01/2009 Number of Days to Update: 62 Source: U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Telephone: 202-528-4285 Last EDR Contact: 06/16/2010 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 09/27/2010 Data Release Frequency: Varies TC2826208.2s Page GR-12 GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING CONSENT: Superfund (CERCLA) Consent Decrees Major legal settlements that establish responsibility and standards for cleanup at NPL (Superfund) sites. Released periodically by United States District Courts after settlement by parties to litigation matters. Date of Government Version: 04/11/2010 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 04/19/2010 Date Made Active in Reports: 05/17/2010 Number of Days to Update: 28 Source: Department of Justice, Consent Decree Library Telephone: Varies Last EDR Contact: 07/08/2010 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 10/18/2010 Data Release Frequency: Varies ROD: Records Of Decision Record of Decision. ROD documents mandate a permanent remedy at an NPL (Superfund) site containing technical and health information to aid in the cleanup. Date of Government Version: 04/29/2010 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 05/07/2010 Date Made Active in Reports: 05/27/2010 Number of Days to Update: 20 Source: EPA Telephone: 703-416-0223 Last EDR Contact: 06/16/2010 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 09/27/2010 Data Release Frequency: Annually UMTRA: Uranium Mill Tailings Sites Uranium ore was mined by private companies for federal government use in national defense programs. When the mills shut down, large piles of the sand-like material (mill tailings) remain after uranium has been extracted from the ore. Levels of human exposure to radioactive materials from the piles are low; however, in some cases tailings were used as construction materials before the potential health hazards of the tailings were recognized. Date of Government Version: 01/05/2009 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 05/07/2009 Date Made Active in Reports: 05/08/2009 Number of Days to Update: 1 Source: Department of Energy Telephone: 505-845-0011 Last EDR Contact: 06/01/2010 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 09/13/2010 Data Release Frequency: Varies MINES: Mines Master Index File Contains all mine identification numbers issued for mines active or opened since 1971. The data also includes violation information. Date of Government Version: 02/12/2010 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 03/10/2010 Date Made Active in Reports: 05/17/2010 Number of Days to Update: 68 Source: Department of Labor, Mine Safety and Health Administration Telephone: 303-231-5959 Last EDR Contact: 06/09/2010 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 09/20/2010 Data Release Frequency: Semi-Annually TRIS: Toxic Chemical Release Inventory System Toxic Release Inventory System. TRIS identifies facilities which release toxic chemicals to the air, water and land in reportable quantities under SARA Title III Section 313. Date of Government Version: 12/31/2008 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 01/13/2010 Date Made Active in Reports: 02/18/2010 Number of Days to Update: 36 Source: EPA Telephone: 202-566-0250 Last EDR Contact: 06/04/2010 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 09/13/2010 Data Release Frequency: Annually TSCA: Toxic Substances Control Act Toxic Substances Control Act. TSCA identifies manufacturers and importers of chemical substances included on the TSCA Chemical Substance Inventory list. It includes data on the production volume of these substances by plant site. Date of Government Version: 12/31/2002 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 04/14/2006 Date Made Active in Reports: 05/30/2006 Number of Days to Update: 46 Source: EPA Telephone: 202-260-5521 Last EDR Contact: 07/07/2010 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 10/11/2010 Data Release Frequency: Every 4 Years TC2826208.2s Page GR-13 GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING FTTS: FIFRA/ TSCA Tracking System - FIFRA (Federal Insecticide, Fungicide, & Rodenticide Act)/TSCA (Toxic Substances Control Act) FTTS tracks administrative cases and pesticide enforcement actions and compliance activities related to FIFRA, TSCA and EPCRA (Emergency Planning and Community Right-to-Know Act). To maintain currency, EDR contacts the Agency on a quarterly basis. Date of Government Version: 04/09/2009 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 04/16/2009 Date Made Active in Reports: 05/11/2009 Number of Days to Update: 25 Source: EPA/Office of Prevention, Pesticides and Toxic Substances Telephone: 202-566-1667 Last EDR Contact: 06/01/2010 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 09/13/2010 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly FTTS INSP: FIFRA/ TSCA Tracking System - FIFRA (Federal Insecticide, Fungicide, & Rodenticide Act)/TSCA (Toxic Substances Control Act) A listing of FIFRA/TSCA Tracking System (FTTS) inspections and enforcements. Date of Government Version: 04/09/2009 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 04/16/2009 Date Made Active in Reports: 05/11/2009 Number of Days to Update: 25 Source: EPA Telephone: 202-566-1667 Last EDR Contact: 06/01/2010 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 09/13/2010 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly HIST FTTS: FIFRA/TSCA Tracking System Administrative Case Listing A complete administrative case listing from the FIFRA/TSCA Tracking System (FTTS) for all ten EPA regions. The information was obtained from the National Compliance Database (NCDB). NCDB supports the implementation of FIFRA (Federal Insecticide, Fungicide, and Rodenticide Act) and TSCA (Toxic Substances Control Act). Some EPA regions are now closing out records. Because of that, and the fact that some EPA regions are not providing EPA Headquarters with updated records, it was decided to create a HIST FTTS database. It included records that may not be included in the newer FTTS database updates. This database is no longer updated. Date of Government Version: 10/19/2006 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 03/01/2007 Date Made Active in Reports: 04/10/2007 Number of Days to Update: 40 Source: Environmental Protection Agency Telephone: 202-564-2501 Last EDR Contact: 12/17/2007 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 03/17/2008 Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned HIST FTTS INSP: FIFRA/TSCA Tracking System Inspection & Enforcement Case Listing A complete inspection and enforcement case listing from the FIFRA/TSCA Tracking System (FTTS) for all ten EPA regions. The information was obtained from the National Compliance Database (NCDB). NCDB supports the implementation of FIFRA (Federal Insecticide, Fungicide, and Rodenticide Act) and TSCA (Toxic Substances Control Act). Some EPA regions are now closing out records. Because of that, and the fact that some EPA regions are not providing EPA Headquarters with updated records, it was decided to create a HIST FTTS database. It included records that may not be included in the newer FTTS database updates. This database is no longer updated. Date of Government Version: 10/19/2006 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 03/01/2007 Date Made Active in Reports: 04/10/2007 Number of Days to Update: 40 Source: Environmental Protection Agency Telephone: 202-564-2501 Last EDR Contact: 12/17/2008 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 03/17/2008 Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned SSTS: Section 7 Tracking Systems Section 7 of the Federal Insecticide, Fungicide and Rodenticide Act, as amended (92 Stat. 829) requires all registered pesticide-producing establishments to submit a report to the Environmental Protection Agency by March 1st each year. Each establishment must report the types and amounts of pesticides, active ingredients and devices being produced, and those having been produced and sold or distributed in the past year. Date of Government Version: 12/31/2008 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 01/06/2010 Date Made Active in Reports: 02/10/2010 Number of Days to Update: 35 Source: EPA Telephone: 202-564-4203 Last EDR Contact: 05/03/2010 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 08/16/2010 Data Release Frequency: Annually TC2826208.2s Page GR-14 GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING ICIS: Integrated Compliance Information System The Integrated Compliance Information System (ICIS) supports the information needs of the national enforcement and compliance program as well as the unique needs of the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) program. Date of Government Version: 04/24/2010 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 04/29/2010 Date Made Active in Reports: 05/17/2010 Number of Days to Update: 18 Source: Environmental Protection Agency Telephone: 202-564-5088 Last EDR Contact: 06/25/2010 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 10/11/2010 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly PADS: PCB Activity Database System PCB Activity Database. PADS Identifies generators, transporters, commercial storers and/or brokers and disposers of PCB’s who are required to notify the EPA of such activities. Date of Government Version: 09/01/2009 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 10/21/2009 Date Made Active in Reports: 12/01/2009 Number of Days to Update: 41 Source: EPA Telephone: 202-566-0500 Last EDR Contact: 04/22/2010 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 08/02/2010 Data Release Frequency: Annually MLTS: Material Licensing Tracking System MLTS is maintained by the Nuclear Regulatory Commission and contains a list of approximately 8,100 sites which possess or use radioactive materials and which are subject to NRC licensing requirements. To maintain currency, EDR contacts the Agency on a quarterly basis. Date of Government Version: 03/18/2010 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 04/06/2010 Date Made Active in Reports: 05/27/2010 Number of Days to Update: 51 Source: Nuclear Regulatory Commission Telephone: 301-415-7169 Last EDR Contact: 06/14/2010 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 09/27/2010 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly RADINFO: Radiation Information Database The Radiation Information Database (RADINFO) contains information about facilities that are regulated by U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) regulations for radiation and radioactivity. Date of Government Version: 04/13/2010 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 04/14/2010 Date Made Active in Reports: 05/17/2010 Number of Days to Update: 33 Source: Environmental Protection Agency Telephone: 202-343-9775 Last EDR Contact: 07/14/2010 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 10/25/2010 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly FINDS: Facility Index System/Facility Registry System Facility Index System. FINDS contains both facility information and ’pointers’ to other sources that contain more detail. EDR includes the following FINDS databases in this report: PCS (Permit Compliance System), AIRS (Aerometric Information Retrieval System), DOCKET (Enforcement Docket used to manage and track information on civil judicial enforcement cases for all environmental statutes), FURS (Federal Underground Injection Control), C-DOCKET (Criminal Docket System used to track criminal enforcement actions for all environmental statutes), FFIS (Federal Facilities Information System), STATE (State Environmental Laws and Statutes), and PADS (PCB Activity Data System). Date of Government Version: 04/14/2010 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 04/16/2010 Date Made Active in Reports: 05/27/2010 Number of Days to Update: 41 Source: EPA Telephone: (206) 553-1200 Last EDR Contact: 07/07/2010 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 09/27/2010 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly RAATS: RCRA Administrative Action Tracking System RCRA Administration Action Tracking System. RAATS contains records based on enforcement actions issued under RCRA pertaining to major violators and includes administrative and civil actions brought by the EPA. For administration actions after September 30, 1995, data entry in the RAATS database was discontinued. EPA will retain a copy of the database for historical records. It was necessary to terminate RAATS because a decrease in agency resources made it impossible to continue to update the information contained in the database. TC2826208.2s Page GR-15 GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING Date of Government Version: 04/17/1995 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 07/03/1995 Date Made Active in Reports: 08/07/1995 Number of Days to Update: 35 Source: EPA Telephone: 202-564-4104 Last EDR Contact: 06/02/2008 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 09/01/2008 Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned BRS: Biennial Reporting System The Biennial Reporting System is a national system administered by the EPA that collects data on the generation and management of hazardous waste. BRS captures detailed data from two groups: Large Quantity Generators (LQG) and Treatment, Storage, and Disposal Facilities. Date of Government Version: 12/31/2007 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 02/25/2010 Date Made Active in Reports: 05/12/2010 Number of Days to Update: 76 Source: EPA/NTIS Telephone: 800-424-9346 Last EDR Contact: 05/25/2010 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 09/06/2010 Data Release Frequency: Biennially UIC: Underground Injection Wells Listing A listing of underground injection wells. Date of Government Version: 05/24/2010 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 05/27/2010 Date Made Active in Reports: 07/15/2010 Number of Days to Update: 49 Source: Department of Ecology Telephone: 360-407-6143 Last EDR Contact: 05/27/2010 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 09/06/2010 Data Release Frequency: Varies WA MANIFEST: Hazardous Waste Manifest Data Hazardous waste manifest information. Date of Government Version: 12/31/2009 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 05/13/2010 Date Made Active in Reports: 05/19/2010 Number of Days to Update: 6 Source: Department of Ecology Telephone: N/A Last EDR Contact: 07/26/2010 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 11/08/2010 Data Release Frequency: Annually DRYCLEANERS: Drycleaner List A listing of registered drycleaners who registered with the Department of Ecology (using the SIC code of 7215 and 7216) as hazardous waste generators. Date of Government Version: 12/31/2009 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 05/13/2010 Date Made Active in Reports: 05/19/2010 Number of Days to Update: 6 Source: Department of Ecology Telephone: 360-407-6732 Last EDR Contact: 07/26/2010 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 11/08/2010 Data Release Frequency: Varies NPDES: Water Quality Permit System Data A listing of permitted wastewater facilities. Date of Government Version: 04/19/2010 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 04/29/2010 Date Made Active in Reports: 05/19/2010 Number of Days to Update: 20 Source: Department of Ecology Telephone: 360-407-6073 Last EDR Contact: 07/27/2010 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 11/08/2010 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly AIRS (EMI): Washington Emissions Data System Emissions inventory data. Date of Government Version: 12/31/2008 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 01/05/2010 Date Made Active in Reports: 01/15/2010 Number of Days to Update: 10 Source: Department of Ecology Telephone: 360-407-6040 Last EDR Contact: 06/25/2010 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 10/11/2010 Data Release Frequency: Annually TC2826208.2s Page GR-16 GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING INACTIVE DRYCLEANERS: Inactive Drycleaners A listing of inactive drycleaner facility locations. Date of Government Version: 12/31/2009 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 05/13/2010 Date Made Active in Reports: 05/19/2010 Number of Days to Update: 6 Source: Department of Ecology Telephone: 360-407-6732 Last EDR Contact: 07/26/2010 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 11/08/2010 Data Release Frequency: Annually INDIAN RESERV: Indian Reservations This map layer portrays Indian administered lands of the United States that have any area equal to or greater than 640 acres. Date of Government Version: 12/31/2005 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 12/08/2006 Date Made Active in Reports: 01/11/2007 Number of Days to Update: 34 Source: USGS Telephone: 202-208-3710 Last EDR Contact: 07/22/2010 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 11/01/2010 Data Release Frequency: Semi-Annually SCRD DRYCLEANERS: State Coalition for Remediation of Drycleaners Listing The State Coalition for Remediation of Drycleaners was established in 1998, with support from the U.S. EPA Office of Superfund Remediation and Technology Innovation. It is comprised of representatives of states with established drycleaner remediation programs. Currently the member states are Alabama, Connecticut, Florida, Illinois, Kansas, Minnesota, Missouri, North Carolina, Oregon, South Carolina, Tennessee, Texas, and Wisconsin. Date of Government Version: 02/10/2010 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 02/11/2010 Date Made Active in Reports: 04/12/2010 Number of Days to Update: 60 Source: Environmental Protection Agency Telephone: 615-532-8599 Last EDR Contact: 07/26/2010 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 11/08/2010 Data Release Frequency: Varies COAL ASH: Coal Ash Disposal Site Listing A listing of coal ash disposal site locations. Date of Government Version: 06/29/2009 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 07/02/2009 Date Made Active in Reports: 07/08/2009 Number of Days to Update: 6 Source: Department of Ecology Telephone: 360-407-6933 Last EDR Contact: 06/21/2010 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 09/27/2010 Data Release Frequency: Varies COAL ASH DOE: Sleam-Electric Plan Operation Data A listing of power plants that store ash in surface ponds. Date of Government Version: 12/31/2005 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 08/07/2009 Date Made Active in Reports: 10/22/2009 Number of Days to Update: 76 Source: Department of Energy Telephone: 202-586-8719 Last EDR Contact: 07/21/2010 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 11/01/2010 Data Release Frequency: Varies COAL ASH EPA: Coal Combustion Residues Surface Impoundments List A listing of coal combustion residues surface impoundments with high hazard potential ratings. Date of Government Version: 11/09/2009 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 12/18/2009 Date Made Active in Reports: 02/10/2010 Number of Days to Update: 54 Source: Environmental Protection Agency Telephone: N/A Last EDR Contact: 06/14/2010 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 09/27/2010 Data Release Frequency: Varies PCB TRANSFORMER: PCB Transformer Registration Database The database of PCB transformer registrations that includes all PCB registration submittals. TC2826208.2s Page GR-17 GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING Date of Government Version: 01/01/2008 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 02/18/2009 Date Made Active in Reports: 05/29/2009 Number of Days to Update: 100 Source: Environmental Protection Agency Telephone: 202-566-0517 Last EDR Contact: 05/14/2010 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 08/16/2010 Data Release Frequency: Varies FEDLAND: Federal and Indian Lands Federally and Indian administrated lands of the United States. Lands included are administrated by: Army Corps of Engineers, Bureau of Reclamation, National Wild and Scenic River, National Wildlife Refuge, Public Domain Land, Wilderness, Wilderness Study Area, Wildlife Management Area, Bureau of Indian Affairs, Bureau of Land Management, Department of Justice, Forest Service, Fish and Wildlife Service, National Park Service. Date of Government Version: 12/31/2005 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 02/06/2006 Date Made Active in Reports: 01/11/2007 Number of Days to Update: 339 Source: U.S. Geological Survey Telephone: 888-275-8747 Last EDR Contact: 07/22/2010 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 11/01/2010 Data Release Frequency: N/A EDR PROPRIETARY RECORDS EDR Proprietary Records Manufactured Gas Plants: EDR Proprietary Manufactured Gas Plants The EDR Proprietary Manufactured Gas Plant Database includes records of coal gas plants (manufactured gas plants) compiled by EDR’s researchers. Manufactured gas sites were used in the United States from the 1800’s to 1950’s to produce a gas that could be distributed and used as fuel. These plants used whale oil, rosin, coal, or a mixture of coal, oil, and water that also produced a significant amount of waste. Many of the byproducts of the gas production, such as coal tar (oily waste containing volatile and non-volatile chemicals), sludges, oils and other compounds are potentially hazardous to human health and the environment. The byproduct from this process was frequently disposed of directly at the plant site and can remain or spread slowly, serving as a continuous source of soil and groundwater contamination. Date of Government Version: N/A Date Data Arrived at EDR: N/A Date Made Active in Reports: N/A Number of Days to Update: N/A Source: EDR, Inc. Telephone: N/A Last EDR Contact: N/A Next Scheduled EDR Contact: N/A Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned EDR Historical Auto Stations: EDR Proprietary Historic Gas Stations EDR has searched selected national collections of business directories and has collected listings of potential gas station/filling station/service station sites that were available to EDR researchers. EDR’s review was limited to those categories of sources that might, in EDR’s opinion, include gas station/filling station/service station establishments. The categories reviewed included, but were not limited to gas, gas station, gasoline station, filling station, auto, automobile repair, auto service station, service station, etc. Date of Government Version: N/A Date Data Arrived at EDR: N/A Date Made Active in Reports: N/A Number of Days to Update: N/A Source: EDR, Inc. Telephone: N/A Last EDR Contact: N/A Next Scheduled EDR Contact: N/A Data Release Frequency: Varies EDR Historical Cleaners: EDR Proprietary Historic Dry Cleaners EDR has searched selected national collections of business directories and has collected listings of potential dry cleaner sites that were available to EDR researchers. EDR’s review was limited to those categories of sources that might, in EDR’s opinion, include dry cleaning establishments. The categories reviewed included, but were not limited to dry cleaners, cleaners, laundry, laundromat, cleaning/laundry, wash & dry etc. Date of Government Version: N/A Date Data Arrived at EDR: N/A Date Made Active in Reports: N/A Number of Days to Update: N/A Source: EDR, Inc. Telephone: N/A Last EDR Contact: N/A Next Scheduled EDR Contact: N/A Data Release Frequency: Varies TC2826208.2s Page GR-18 GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING COUNTY RECORDS KING COUNTY: Abandoned Landfill Study in King County The King County Abandoned Landfill Survey was conducted from October through December 1984 by the Health Department’s Environmental Health Division at the request of the King County Council. The primary objective of the survey was to determine if any public health problems existed at the predetermined 24 sites. Date of Government Version: 04/30/1985 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 11/07/1994 Date Made Active in Reports: N/A Number of Days to Update: 0 Source: Seattle-King County Department of Public Health Telephone: 206-296-4785 Last EDR Contact: 10/21/1994 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: N/A Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned SEATTLE COUNTY: Abandoned Landfill Study in the City of Seattle The Seattle Abandoned Landfill Survey was conducted in June and July of 1984 by the Health Department’s Environmental Health Division at the request of the Mayor’s Office. The primary objective of the survey was to determine if any public health problems existed at the predetermined 12 sites. Date of Government Version: 07/30/1984 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 11/07/1994 Date Made Active in Reports: N/A Number of Days to Update: 0 Source: Seattle - King County Department of Public Health Telephone: 206-296-4785 Last EDR Contact: 10/21/1994 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: N/A Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned SEATTLE/KING COUNTY: Seattle - King County Abandoned Landfill Toxicity / Hazard Assessment Project This report presents the Seattle-King County Health Department’s follow-up investigation of two city owned and four county owned abandoned landfills which was conducted from February to December 1986. Date of Government Version: 12/31/1986 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 08/18/1995 Date Made Active in Reports: 09/20/1995 Number of Days to Update: 33 Source: Department of Public Health Telephone: 206-296-4785 Last EDR Contact: 08/14/1995 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: N/A Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned SNOHOMISH COUNTY: Solid Waste Sites of Record at Snohomish Health District Solid waste disposal and/or utilization sites in Snohomish County. Date of Government Version: 10/01/2008 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 01/30/2009 Date Made Active in Reports: 03/24/2009 Number of Days to Update: 53 Source: Snohomish Health District Telephone: 206-339-5250 Last EDR Contact: 07/09/2010 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 10/11/2010 Data Release Frequency: Semi-Annually TACOMA/PIERCE COUNTY: Closed Landfill Survey Following numerous requests for information about closed dumpsites and landfills in Pierce County, the Tacoma-Pierce County Health Department decided to conduct a study on the matter. The aim of the study was to evaluate public health risks associated with the closed dumpsites and landfills, and to determine the need, if any, for further investigations of a more detailed nature. The sites represent all of the known dumpsites and landfills closed after 1950. TC2826208.2s Page GR-19 GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING Date of Government Version: 09/01/2002 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 03/24/2003 Date Made Active in Reports: 05/14/2003 Number of Days to Update: 51 Source: Tacoma-Pierce County Health Department Telephone: 206-591-6500 Last EDR Contact: 03/19/2003 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: N/A Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned OTHER DATABASE(S) Depending on the geographic area covered by this report, the data provided in these specialty databases may or may not be complete. For example, the existence of wetlands information data in a specific report does not mean that all wetlands in the area covered by the report are included. Moreover, the absence of any reported wetlands information does not necessarily mean that wetlands do not exist in the area covered by the report. CT MANIFEST: Hazardous Waste Manifest Data Facility and manifest data. Manifest is a document that lists and tracks hazardous waste from the generator through transporters to a tsd facility. Date of Government Version: 12/31/2007 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 08/26/2009 Date Made Active in Reports: 09/11/2009 Number of Days to Update: 16 Source: Department of Environmental Protection Telephone: 860-424-3375 Last EDR Contact: 06/04/2010 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 09/06/2010 Data Release Frequency: Annually NY MANIFEST: Facility and Manifest Data Manifest is a document that lists and tracks hazardous waste from the generator through transporters to a TSD facility. Date of Government Version: 04/30/2010 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 05/13/2010 Date Made Active in Reports: 06/21/2010 Number of Days to Update: 39 Source: Department of Environmental Conservation Telephone: 518-402-8651 Last EDR Contact: 05/13/2010 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 08/23/2010 Data Release Frequency: Annually PA MANIFEST: Manifest Information Hazardous waste manifest information. Date of Government Version: 12/31/2008 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 12/01/2009 Date Made Active in Reports: 12/14/2009 Number of Days to Update: 13 Source: Department of Environmental Protection Telephone: 717-783-8990 Last EDR Contact: 05/24/2010 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 09/06/2010 Data Release Frequency: Annually WI MANIFEST: Manifest Information Hazardous waste manifest information. Date of Government Version: 12/31/2009 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 07/06/2010 Date Made Active in Reports: 07/26/2010 Number of Days to Update: 20 Source: Department of Natural Resources Telephone: N/A Last EDR Contact: 06/21/2010 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 10/04/2010 Data Release Frequency: Annually Oil/Gas Pipelines: This data was obtained by EDR from the USGS in 1994. It is referred to by USGS as GeoData Digital Line Graphs from 1:100,000-Scale Maps. It was extracted from the transportation category including some oil, but primarily gas pipelines. Electric Power Transmission Line Data Source: Rextag Strategies Corp. Telephone: (281) 769-2247 U.S. Electric Transmission and Power Plants Systems Digital GIS Data Sensitive Receptors: There are individuals deemed sensitive receptors due to their fragile immune systems and special sensitivity to environmental discharges. These sensitive receptors typically include the elderly, the sick, and children. While the location of all sensitive receptors cannot be determined, EDR indicates those buildings and facilities - schools, daycares, hospitals, medical centers, and nursing homes - where individuals who are sensitive receptors are likely to be located. TC2826208.2s Page GR-20 GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING AHA Hospitals: Source: American Hospital Association, Inc. Telephone: 312-280-5991 The database includes a listing of hospitals based on the American Hospital Association’s annual survey of hospitals. Medical Centers: Provider of Services Listing Source: Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services Telephone: 410-786-3000 A listing of hospitals with Medicare provider number, produced by Centers of Medicare & Medicaid Services, a federal agency within the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. Nursing Homes Source: National Institutes of Health Telephone: 301-594-6248 Information on Medicare and Medicaid certified nursing homes in the United States. Public Schools Source: National Center for Education Statistics Telephone: 202-502-7300 The National Center for Education Statistics’ primary database on elementary and secondary public education in the United States. It is a comprehensive, annual, national statistical database of all public elementary and secondary schools and school districts, which contains data that are comparable across all states. Private Schools Source: National Center for Education Statistics Telephone: 202-502-7300 The National Center for Education Statistics’ primary database on private school locations in the United States. Daycare Centers: Daycare Center Listing Source: Department of Social & Health Services Telephone: 253-383-1735 Flood Zone Data: This data, available in select counties across the country, was obtained by EDR in 2003 & 2009 from the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA). Data depicts 100-year and 500-year flood zones as defined by FEMA. NWI: National Wetlands Inventory. This data, available in select counties across the country, was obtained by EDR in 2002 and 2005 from the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. Scanned Digital USGS 7.5’ Topographic Map (DRG) Source: United States Geologic Survey A digital raster graphic (DRG) is a scanned image of a U.S. Geological Survey topographic map. The map images are made by scanning published paper maps on high-resolution scanners. The raster image is georeferenced and fit to the Universal Transverse Mercator (UTM) projection. STREET AND ADDRESS INFORMATION © 2010 Tele Atlas North America, Inc. All rights reserved. This material is proprietary and the subject of copyright protection and other intellectual property rights owned by or licensed to Tele Atlas North America, Inc. The use of this material is subject to the terms of a license agreement. You will be held liable for any unauthorized copying or disclosure of this material. TC2826208.2s Page GR-21 GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING TC2826208.2s Page A-1 geologic strata. of the soil, and nearby wells. Groundwater flow velocity is generally impacted by the nature of the Groundwater flow direction may be impacted by surface topography, hydrology, hydrogeology, characteristics 2. Groundwater flow velocity. 1. Groundwater flow direction, and Assessment of the impact of contaminant migration generally has two principle investigative components: forming an opinion about the impact of potential contaminant migration. EDR’s GeoCheck Physical Setting Source Addendum is provided to assist the environmental professional in 1994Most Recent Revision: 47122-D2 RENTON, WASouth Map: 1983Most Recent Revision: 47122-E2 MERCER ISLAND, WATarget Property Map: USGS TOPOGRAPHIC MAP 344 ft. above sea levelElevation: 5260913.0UTM Y (Meters): 561622.4UTM X (Meters): Zone 10Universal Tranverse Mercator: 122.1818 - 122˚ 10’ 54.5’’Longitude (West): 47.50070 - 47˚ 30’ 2.5’’Latitude (North): TARGET PROPERTY COORDINATES RENTON, WA 98056 SUNSET LANE NE AT NE 10TH ST SUNSET TERRACE SENIOR HOUSING CENTER DEVELOPMENT TARGET PROPERTY ADDRESS GEOCHECK - PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE ADDENDUM® TC2826208.2s Page A-2 should be field verified. on a relative (not an absolute) basis. Relative elevation information between sites of close proximity Source: Topography has been determined from the USGS 7.5’ Digital Elevation Model and should be evaluated SURROUNDING TOPOGRAPHY: ELEVATION PROFILES Elevation (ft)Elevation (ft)TP TP 0 1/2 1 Miles✩Target Property Elevation: 344 ft. North South West East306278278296298298306317332344349357364367372379380367333343498192214251267279333344356380392426430430432430416General WSWGeneral Topographic Gradient: TARGET PROPERTY TOPOGRAPHY should contamination exist on the target property, what downgradient sites might be impacted. assist the environmental professional in forming an opinion about the impact of nearby contaminated properties or, Surface topography may be indicative of the direction of surficial groundwater flow. This information can be used to TOPOGRAPHIC INFORMATION collected on nearby properties, and regional groundwater flow information (from deep aquifers). sources of information, such as surface topographic information, hydrologic information, hydrogeologic data using site-specific well data. If such data is not reasonably ascertainable, it may be necessary to rely on other Groundwater flow direction for a particular site is best determined by a qualified environmental professional GROUNDWATER FLOW DIRECTION INFORMATION GEOCHECK - PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE SUMMARY® TC2826208.2s Page A-3 GENERAL DIRECTIONLOCATION GROUNDWATER FLOWFROM TPMAP ID hydrogeologically, and the depth to water table. authorities at select sites and has extracted the date of the report, groundwater flow direction as determined flow at specific points. EDR has reviewed reports submitted by environmental professionals to regulatory EDR has developed the AQUIFLOW Information System to provide data on the general direction of groundwater AQUIFLOW® Search Radius: 1.000 Mile. * ©1996 Site-specific hydrogeological data gathered by CERCLIS Alerts, Inc., Bainbridge Island, WA. All rights reserved. All of the information and opinions presented are those of the cited EPA report(s), which were completed under a Comprehensive Environmental Response Compensation and Liability Information System (CERCLIS) investigation. Information is inferred in the CERCLIS investigation report(s) Data Quality: No information about a sole source aquifer is available Sole Source Aquifer: and gravel. The uppermost aquifer is located in a glacial drift composed of sand Hydraulic Connection: 18 feet Inferred Depth to Water: NOT AVAILABLE Groundwater Flow Direction: WAD980639314 Site EPA ID Number: KING CO SOLID WASTE DIV RENTON TRANS STA Site Name: 1/2 - 1 Mile SSE Location Relative to TP: 1.25 miles Search Radius: Site-Specific Hydrogeological Data*: * ©1996 Site-specific hydrogeological data gathered by CERCLIS Alerts, Inc., Bainbridge Island, WA. All rights reserved. All of the information and opinions presented are those of the cited EPA report(s), which were completed under a Comprehensive Environmental Response Compensation and Liability Information System (CERCLIS) investigation. contamination exist on the target property, what downgradient sites might be impacted. environmental professional in forming an opinion about the impact of nearby contaminated properties or, should of groundwater flow direction in the immediate area. Such hydrogeologic information can be used to assist the Hydrogeologic information obtained by installation of wells on a specific site can often be an indicator HYDROGEOLOGIC INFORMATION YES - refer to the Overview Map and Detail MapMERCER ISLAND NATIONAL WETLAND INVENTORY NWI Electronic Data CoverageNWI Quad at Target Property 53033C0977F - FEMA Q3 Flood data 53033C0981F - FEMA Q3 Flood data 53033C0664F - FEMA Q3 Flood dataAdditional Panels in search area: 53033C0668F - FEMA Q3 Flood dataFlood Plain Panel at Target Property: YES - refer to the Overview Map and Detail MapKING, WA FEMA FLOOD ZONE FEMA Flood Electronic DataTarget Property County and bodies of water). Refer to the Physical Setting Source Map following this summary for hydrologic information (major waterways contamination exist on the target property, what downgradient sites might be impacted. the environmental professional in forming an opinion about the impact of nearby contaminated properties or, should Surface water can act as a hydrologic barrier to groundwater flow. Such hydrologic information can be used to assist HYDROLOGIC INFORMATION GEOCHECK - PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE SUMMARY® TC2826208.2s Page A-4 For additional site information, refer to Physical Setting Source Map Findings. Not Reported1/2 - 1 Mile ENE7 NNE1/4 - 1/2 Mile NE5 GENERAL DIRECTIONLOCATION GROUNDWATER FLOWFROM TPMAP ID GEOCHECK - PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE SUMMARY® TC2826208.2s Page A-5 Map, USGS Digital Data Series DDS - 11 (1994). of the Conterminous U.S. at 1:2,500,000 Scale - a digital representation of the 1974 P.B. King and H.M. Beikman Geologic Age and Rock Stratigraphic Unit Source: P.G. Schruben, R.E. Arndt and W.J. Bawiec, Geology ROCK STRATIGRAPHIC UNIT GEOLOGIC AGE IDENTIFICATION Volcanic RocksCategory:CenozoicEra: TertiarySystem: Lower Tertiary andesiteSeries: lTaCode: (decoded above as Era, System & Series) at which contaminant migration may be occurring. Geologic information can be used by the environmental professional in forming an opinion about the relative speed GEOLOGIC INFORMATION IN GENERAL AREA OF TARGET PROPERTY move more quickly through sandy-gravelly types of soils than silty-clayey types of soils. characteristics data collected on nearby properties and regional soil information. In general, contaminant plumes to rely on other sources of information, including geologic age identification, rock stratigraphic unit and soil using site specific geologic and soil strata data. If such data are not reasonably ascertainable, it may be necessary Groundwater flow velocity information for a particular site is best determined by a qualified environmental professional GROUNDWATER FLOW VELOCITY INFORMATION GEOCHECK - PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE SUMMARY® EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc. 1 2 4 2 3 3 0 1/16 1/8 1/4 Miles TC2826208.2s Page A-7 5.1 Max: 6 Min: Min: 0.01 Max: 0.42 Gravel fines, Silty Gravels with SOILS, Gravels, COARSE-GRAINED Sand. Gravel and Fragments, 200), Stone passing No. pct. or less materials (35 Granular sandy loam very gravelly59 inches25 inches 2 5.1 Max: 6 Min: Min: 0.01 Max: 0.42 Gravel fines, Silty Gravels with SOILS, Gravels, COARSE-GRAINED Sand. Gravel and Fragments, 200), Stone passing No. pct. or less materials (35 Granular loam gravelly sandy25 inches 0 inches 1 Soil Layer Information Boundary Classification Saturated hydraulic conductivity micro m/sec Layer Upper Lower Soil Texture Class AASHTO Group Unified Soil Soil Reaction (pH) > 84 inchesDepth to Watertable Min: > 0 inchesDepth to Bedrock Min: ModerateCorrosion Potential - Uncoated Steel: Hydric Status: Not hydric Moderately well drainedSoil Drainage Class: movement of water, or soils with moderately fine or fine textures. Class C - Slow infiltration rates. Soils with layers impeding downwardHydrologic Group: gravelly sandy loamSoil Surface Texture: ArentsSoil Component Name: Soil Map ID: 1 in a landscape. The following information is based on Soil Conservation Service SSURGO data. for privately owned lands in the United States. A soil map in a soil survey is a representation of soil patterns Survey (NCSS) and is responsible for collecting, storing, maintaining and distributing soil survey information The U.S. Department of Agriculture’s (USDA) Soil Conservation Service (SCS) leads the National Cooperative Soil DOMINANT SOIL COMPOSITION IN GENERAL AREA OF TARGET PROPERTY GEOCHECK - PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE SUMMARY® TC2826208.2s Page A-8 Min: 5.6 Max: 7.3 Min: 42 Max: 141 Silty Sand. Sands with fines, SOILS, Sands, COARSE-GRAINED sand. Poorly graded Clean Sands, SOILS, Sands, COARSE-GRAINED Soils. 200), Silty passing No. than 35 pct. Materials (more Silt-Clayfine sandy loam 3 inches 0 inches 1 Soil Layer Information Boundary Classification Saturated hydraulic conductivity micro m/sec Layer Upper Lower Soil Texture Class AASHTO Group Unified Soil Soil Reaction (pH) > 0 inchesDepth to Watertable Min: > 0 inchesDepth to Bedrock Min: ModerateCorrosion Potential - Uncoated Steel: Hydric Status: Not hydric Well drainedSoil Drainage Class: textures. moderately well and well drained soils with moderately coarse Class B - Moderate infiltration rates. Deep and moderately deep,Hydrologic Group: fine sandy loamSoil Surface Texture: RagnarSoil Component Name: Soil Map ID: 3 No Layer Information available. > 0 inchesDepth to Watertable Min: > 0 inchesDepth to Bedrock Min: Not ReportedCorrosion Potential - Uncoated Steel: Hydric Status: Not hydric Soil Drainage Class: water table, or are shallow to an impervious layer. Class D - Very slow infiltration rates. Soils are clayey, have a highHydrologic Group: gravelly sandy loamSoil Surface Texture: Urban landSoil Component Name: Soil Map ID: 2 GEOCHECK - PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE SUMMARY® TC2826208.2s Page A-9 > 0 inchesDepth to Watertable Min: > 0 inchesDepth to Bedrock Min: ModerateCorrosion Potential - Uncoated Steel: Hydric Status: Not hydric Somewhat excessively drainedSoil Drainage Class: excessively drained sands and gravels. Class A - High infiltration rates. Soils are deep, well drained toHydrologic Group: loamy fine sandSoil Surface Texture: IndianolaSoil Component Name: Soil Map ID: 4 Min: 5.6 Max: 7.3 Min: 42 Max: 141 Silty Sand. Sands with fines, SOILS, Sands, COARSE-GRAINED sand. Poorly graded Clean Sands, SOILS, Sands, COARSE-GRAINED Soils. 200), Silty passing No. than 35 pct. Materials (more Silt-Clayloamy sand59 inches26 inches 3 Min: 5.6 Max: 7.3 Min: 42 Max: 141 Silty Sand. Sands with fines, SOILS, Sands, COARSE-GRAINED sand. Poorly graded Clean Sands, SOILS, Sands, COARSE-GRAINED Soils. 200), Silty passing No. than 35 pct. Materials (more Silt-Clayfine sandy loam26 inches 3 inches 2 Soil Layer Information Boundary Classification Saturated hydraulic conductivity micro m/sec Layer Upper Lower Soil Texture Class AASHTO Group Unified Soil Soil Reaction (pH) GEOCHECK - PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE SUMMARY® TC2826208.2s Page A-10 1/8 - 1/4 Mile SEUSGS3276529 A2 1/8 - 1/4 Mile SEUSGS3276534 A1 FEDERAL USGS WELL INFORMATION LOCATION FROM TPWELL IDMAP ID 1.000State Database Nearest PWS within 1 mileFederal FRDS PWS 1.000Federal USGS WELL SEARCH DISTANCE INFORMATION SEARCH DISTANCE (miles)DATABASE opinion about the impact of contaminant migration on nearby drinking water wells. professional in assessing sources that may impact ground water flow direction, and in forming an EDR Local/Regional Water Agency records provide water well information to assist the environmental LOCAL / REGIONAL WATER AGENCY RECORDS Min: 6.1 Max: 6.5 Min: 141 Max: 705 Silty Sand. Sands with fines, SOILS, Sands, COARSE-GRAINED and Sand. Clayey Gravel 200), Silty, or passing No. pct. or less materials (35 Granularsand59 inches29 inches 3 Min: 6.1 Max: 6.5 Min: 141 Max: 705 Silty Sand. Sands with fines, SOILS, Sands, COARSE-GRAINED and Sand. Clayey Gravel 200), Silty, or passing No. pct. or less materials (35 Granularloamy fine sand29 inches 5 inches 2 Min: 6.1 Max: 6.5 Min: 141 Max: 705 Silty Sand. Sands with fines, SOILS, Sands, COARSE-GRAINED and Sand. Clayey Gravel 200), Silty, or passing No. pct. or less materials (35 Granularloamy fine sand 5 inches 0 inches 1 Soil Layer Information Boundary Classification Saturated hydraulic conductivity micro m/sec Layer Upper Lower Soil Texture Class AASHTO Group Unified Soil Soil Reaction (pH) GEOCHECK - PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE SUMMARY® TC2826208.2s Page A-11 1/4 - 1/2 Mile NEWA6000000012779 6 STATE DATABASE WELL INFORMATION LOCATION FROM TPWELL IDMAP ID Note: PWS System location is not always the same as well location. No PWS System Found FEDERAL FRDS PUBLIC WATER SUPPLY SYSTEM INFORMATION LOCATION FROM TPWELL IDMAP ID 1/2 - 1 Mile WSWUSGS3276505 8 1/4 - 1/2 Mile SouthUSGS3276507 4 1/4 - 1/2 Mile NEUSGS3281028 3 FEDERAL USGS WELL INFORMATION LOCATION FROM TPWELL IDMAP ID GEOCHECK - PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE SUMMARY® EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc. 2 3203 20 3 2 0 4404404802 00 4 0 0 3 60 3 2 0 3 2 0 4040408 080 801 2 0 1 201201201601601601 1601 602002 002 0 0 2 0 0 2 0 0 200 2002 40240 2402 4 0 2 4 0 240240 240280 280 2 80 28028028 0280 2 802 8032 0 320 3 20320 3203203 6 360 36 0360360 3604 0 0 4 0 0 400 400 400 4 0 0 4004003 60 4004004 00 400 3204404004004003603603603203 202802 8 0 280280240 240240 2 0020020016016016 040408080 1 20120 WA TC2826208.2s Page A-13 A2 SE 1/8 - 1/4 Mile Higher USGS3276529FED USGS Note: The site was being pumped. 1958-10-01 55 Date Feet below Surface Feet to Sealevel ------------------------------------------------- Ground-water levels, Number of Measurements: 1 1Ground water data count: 1958-10-01Ground water data end date:Ground water data begin date: 1958-10-01 0Water quality data count:0000-00-00Water quality data end date: 0000-00-00Water quality data begin date:0Peak flow data count: 0000-00-00Peak flow data end date:0000-00-00Peak flow data begin date: 0Daily flow data count:0000-00-00Daily flow data end date: 0000-00-00Daily flow data begin date:0Real time data flag: Not ReportedProject number: drillerSource of depth data: Not ReportedHole depth:200Well depth: Not ReportedAquifer: Not ReportedAquifer Type: Single well, other than collector or Ranney typeType of ground water site: YLocal standard time flag: PSTMean greenwich time offset:Not ReportedDate inventoried: 19010101Date construction:Ground-water other than SpringSite type: Not ReportedTopographic: Lake Washington. Washington. Area = 619 sq.mi.Hydrologic: National Geodetic Vertical Datum of 1929Altitude datum: 3Altitude accuracy: Interpolated from topographic mapAltitude method: 400Altitude: 24000Map scale:RENTONLocation map: NE NW S09 T23N R05E WLand net:USCountry: 033County:53State: 53District:NAD83Dec latlong datum: NAD27Latlong datum:SCoor accr: MCoor meth:-122.17845448Dec lon: 47.49871119Dec lat:1221038Longitude: USGS3276534EDR Site id:472956Latitude: 23N/05E-09C02Site name: 472956122103801Site no:USGSAgency cd: A1 SE 1/8 - 1/4 Mile Higher USGS3276534FED USGS Map ID Direction Distance Elevation EDR ID NumberDatabase GEOCHECK - PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE MAP FINDINGS® TC2826208.2s Page A-14 PSTMean greenwich time offset:Not ReportedDate inventoried: 19010101Date construction:Ground-water other than SpringSite type: Not ReportedTopographic: Lake Washington. Washington. Area = 619 sq.mi.Hydrologic: National Geodetic Vertical Datum of 1929Altitude datum: 2Altitude accuracy: Interpolated from topographic mapAltitude method: 300Altitude: 24000Map scale:MERCER ISLANDLocation map: SE SW S04 T23N R05E WLand net:USCountry: 033County:53State: 53District:NAD83Dec latlong datum: NAD27Latlong datum:SCoor accr: MCoor meth:-122.17845455Dec lon: 47.50398894Dec lat:1221038Longitude: USGS3281028EDR Site id:473015Latitude: 23N/05E-04P01Site name: 474846122103801Site no:USGSAgency cd: 3 NE 1/4 - 1/2 Mile Higher USGS3281028FED USGS 1948-03-01 72 Date Feet below Surface Feet to Sealevel ------------------------------------------------- Ground-water levels, Number of Measurements: 1 1Ground water data count: 1948-03-01Ground water data end date:Ground water data begin date: 1948-03-01 0Water quality data count:0000-00-00Water quality data end date: 0000-00-00Water quality data begin date:0Peak flow data count: 0000-00-00Peak flow data end date:0000-00-00Peak flow data begin date: 0Daily flow data count:0000-00-00Daily flow data end date: 0000-00-00Daily flow data begin date:0Real time data flag: Not ReportedProject number: drillerSource of depth data: Not ReportedHole depth:175Well depth: Not ReportedAquifer: Not ReportedAquifer Type: Single well, other than collector or Ranney typeType of ground water site: YLocal standard time flag: PSTMean greenwich time offset:Not ReportedDate inventoried: 19480301Date construction:Ground-water other than SpringSite type: Not ReportedTopographic: Lake Washington. Washington. Area = 619 sq.mi.Hydrologic: National Geodetic Vertical Datum of 1929Altitude datum: 3Altitude accuracy: Interpolated from topographic mapAltitude method: 350Altitude: 24000Map scale:RENTONLocation map: NE NW S09 T23N R05E WLand net:USCountry: 033County:53State: 53District:NAD83Dec latlong datum: NAD27Latlong datum:SCoor accr: MCoor meth:-122.17817669Dec lon: 47.49843342Dec lat:1221037Longitude: USGS3276529EDR Site id:472955Latitude: 23N/05E-09C01Site name: 472955122103701Site no:USGSAgency cd: GEOCHECK - PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE MAP FINDINGS® TC2826208.2s Page A-15 1Ground water data count: 1943-09-05Ground water data end date:Ground water data begin date: 1943-09-05 1Water quality data count:1951-06-04Water quality data end date: 1951-06-04Water quality data begin date:0Peak flow data count: 0000-00-00Peak flow data end date:0000-00-00Peak flow data begin date: 0Daily flow data count:0000-00-00Daily flow data end date: 0000-00-00Daily flow data begin date:0Real time data flag: Not ReportedProject number: otherSource of depth data: Not ReportedHole depth:424Well depth: Not ReportedAquifer: Not ReportedAquifer Type: Single well, other than collector or Ranney typeType of ground water site: YLocal standard time flag: PSTMean greenwich time offset:Not ReportedDate inventoried: 19430905Date construction:Ground-water other than SpringSite type: Not ReportedTopographic: Lake Washington. Washington. Area = 619 sq.mi.Hydrologic: National Geodetic Vertical Datum of 1929Altitude datum: 3Altitude accuracy: Interpolated from topographic mapAltitude method: 285Altitude: 24000Map scale:RENTONLocation map: SW NW S09 T23N R05E WLand net:USCountry: 033County:53State: 53District:NAD83Dec latlong datum: NAD27Latlong datum:SCoor accr: MCoor meth:-122.18178784Dec lon: 47.49648895Dec lat:1221050Longitude: USGS3276507EDR Site id:472948Latitude: 23N/05E-09E01Site name: 472948122105001Site no:USGSAgency cd: 4 South 1/4 - 1/2 Mile Lower USGS3276507FED USGS 1972-08-10 8 Date Feet below Surface Feet to Sealevel ------------------------------------------------- Ground-water levels, Number of Measurements: 1 1Ground water data count: 1972-08-10Ground water data end date:Ground water data begin date: 1972-08-10 0Water quality data count:0000-00-00Water quality data end date: 0000-00-00Water quality data begin date:0Peak flow data count: 0000-00-00Peak flow data end date:0000-00-00Peak flow data begin date: 0Daily flow data count:0000-00-00Daily flow data end date: 0000-00-00Daily flow data begin date:0Real time data flag: Not ReportedProject number: drillerSource of depth data: Not ReportedHole depth:120Well depth: Not ReportedAquifer: Not ReportedAquifer Type: Single well, other than collector or Ranney typeType of ground water site: YLocal standard time flag: GEOCHECK - PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE MAP FINDINGS® TC2826208.2s Page A-16 24000Map scale:RENTONLocation map: SE NW S08 T23N R05E WLand net:USCountry: 033County:53State: 53District:NAD83Dec latlong datum: NAD27Latlong datum:SCoor accr: MCoor meth:-122.19817703Dec lon: 47.49621103Dec lat:1221149Longitude: USGS3276505EDR Site id:472947Latitude: 23N/05E-08F01Site name: 472947122114901Site no:USGSAgency cd: 8 WSW 1/2 - 1 Mile Lower USGS3276505FED USGS Date: 02/29/1996 Average Water Table Depth: Not Reported Deepest Water Table Depth: 18.47 Shallowest Water Table Depth: 7.75 Groundwater Flow: Not Reported Site ID: 27097 ENE 1/2 - 1 Mile Higher 61241AQUIFLOW WA6000000012779Site id:rsled@ci.renton.wa.usEmailaddr: 98056Zip:WAState: RENTONCity:3555 NE 2ND STAddr2: Not ReportedAddr1:(425) 430-7400Dayphone: Not RatedSrcsuscept:Quarter Quarter SectionLocmethod: 47.50492Latitude: -122.177Longitude: EmergencySrcuse: Ground Water - WellSrctype:WELL #4Srcname: KINGCounty:NorthwestRegion: CommSystemtype:ASystemgrp: RENTON, CITY OFSystemname:06Srcnum: 71850Pwsid:16725Oid : 7185006Pwssrcid:12379Objectid: 6 NE 1/4 - 1/2 Mile Higher WA6000000012779WA WELLS Date: 01/15/1998 Average Water Table Depth: 55 Deepest Water Table Depth: Not Reported Shallowest Water Table Depth: Not Reported Groundwater Flow: NNE Site ID: 4150015 NE 1/4 - 1/2 Mile Higher 61029AQUIFLOW 1943-09-05 85 Date Feet below Surface Feet to Sealevel ------------------------------------------------- Ground-water levels, Number of Measurements: 1 GEOCHECK - PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE MAP FINDINGS® TC2826208.2s Page A-17 1962-01-01 9 Date Feet below Surface Feet to Sealevel ------------------------------------------------- Ground-water levels, Number of Measurements: 1 1Ground water data count: 1962-01-01Ground water data end date:Ground water data begin date: 1962-01-01 0Water quality data count:0000-00-00Water quality data end date: 0000-00-00Water quality data begin date:0Peak flow data count: 0000-00-00Peak flow data end date:0000-00-00Peak flow data begin date: 0Daily flow data count:0000-00-00Daily flow data end date: 0000-00-00Daily flow data begin date:0Real time data flag: Not ReportedProject number: drillerSource of depth data: Not ReportedHole depth:131Well depth: Not ReportedAquifer: Not ReportedAquifer Type: Single well, other than collector or Ranney typeType of ground water site: YLocal standard time flag: PSTMean greenwich time offset:Not ReportedDate inventoried: 19620101Date construction:Ground-water other than SpringSite type: Not ReportedTopographic: Lake Washington. Washington. Area = 619 sq.mi.Hydrologic: National Geodetic Vertical Datum of 1929Altitude datum: 3Altitude accuracy: Interpolated from topographic mapAltitude method: 34Altitude: GEOCHECK - PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE MAP FINDINGS® TC2826208.2s Page A-18 0%0%100%0.600 pCi/LBasement Not ReportedNot ReportedNot ReportedNot ReportedLiving Area - 2nd Floor 0%0%100%0.800 pCi/LLiving Area - 1st Floor % >20 pCi/L% 4-20 pCi/L% <4 pCi/LAverage ActivityArea Number of sites tested: 2 Federal Area Radon Information for Zip Code: 98056 : Zone 3 indoor average level < 2 pCi/L. : Zone 2 indoor average level >= 2 pCi/L and <= 4 pCi/L. Note: Zone 1 indoor average level > 4 pCi/L. Federal EPA Radon Zone for KING County: 3 AREA RADON INFORMATION GEOCHECK - PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE MAP FINDINGS RADON ® TOPOGRAPHIC INFORMATION USGS 7.5’ Digital Elevation Model (DEM) Source: United States Geologic Survey EDR acquired the USGS 7.5’ Digital Elevation Model in 2002 and updated it in 2006. The 7.5 minute DEM corresponds to the USGS 1:24,000- and 1:25,000-scale topographic quadrangle maps. The DEM provides elevation data with consistent elevation units and projection. Scanned Digital USGS 7.5’ Topographic Map (DRG) Source: United States Geologic Survey A digital raster graphic (DRG) is a scanned image of a U.S. Geological Survey topographic map. The map images are made by scanning published paper maps on high-resolution scanners. The raster image is georeferenced and fit to the Universal Transverse Mercator (UTM) projection. HYDROLOGIC INFORMATION Flood Zone Data: This data, available in select counties across the country, was obtained by EDR in 2003 & 2009 from the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA). Data depicts 100-year and 500-year flood zones as defined by FEMA. NWI: National Wetlands Inventory. This data, available in select counties across the country, was obtained by EDR in 2002 and 2005 from the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. HYDROGEOLOGIC INFORMATION AQUIFLOW Information SystemR Source: EDR proprietary database of groundwater flow information EDR has developed the AQUIFLOW Information System (AIS) to provide data on the general direction of groundwater flow at specific points. EDR has reviewed reports submitted to regulatory authorities at select sites and has extracted the date of the report, hydrogeologically determined groundwater flow direction and depth to water table information. GEOLOGIC INFORMATION Geologic Age and Rock Stratigraphic Unit Source: P.G. Schruben, R.E. Arndt and W.J. Bawiec, Geology of the Conterminous U.S. at 1:2,500,000 Scale - A digital representation of the 1974 P.B. King and H.M. Beikman Map, USGS Digital Data Series DDS - 11 (1994). STATSGO: State Soil Geographic Database Source: Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Services The U.S. Department of Agriculture’s (USDA) Natural Resources Conservation Service (NRCS) leads the national Conservation Soil Survey (NCSS) and is responsible for collecting, storing, maintaining and distributing soil survey information for privately owned lands in the United States. A soil map in a soil survey is a representation of soil patterns in a landscape. Soil maps for STATSGO are compiled by generalizing more detailed (SSURGO) soil survey maps. SSURGO: Soil Survey Geographic Database Source: Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Services (NRCS) Telephone: 800-672-5559 SSURGO is the most detailed level of mapping done by the Natural Resources Conservation Services, mapping scales generally range from 1:12,000 to 1:63,360. Field mapping methods using national standards are used to construct the soil maps in the Soil Survey Geographic (SSURGO) database. SSURGO digitizing duplicates the original soil survey maps. This level of mapping is designed for use by landowners, townships and county natural resource planning and management. TC2826208.2s Page A-19 PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE RECORDS SEARCHED LOCAL / REGIONAL WATER AGENCY RECORDS FEDERAL WATER WELLS PWS: Public Water Systems Source: EPA/Office of Drinking Water Telephone: 202-564-3750 Public Water System data from the Federal Reporting Data System. A PWS is any water system which provides water to at least 25 people for at least 60 days annually. PWSs provide water from wells, rivers and other sources. PWS ENF: Public Water Systems Violation and Enforcement Data Source: EPA/Office of Drinking Water Telephone: 202-564-3750 Violation and Enforcement data for Public Water Systems from the Safe Drinking Water Information System (SDWIS) after August 1995. Prior to August 1995, the data came from the Federal Reporting Data System (FRDS). USGS Water Wells: USGS National Water Inventory System (NWIS) This database contains descriptive information on sites where the USGS collects or has collected data on surface water and/or groundwater. The groundwater data includes information on wells, springs, and other sources of groundwater. STATE RECORDS Water Wells Source: Department of Health Telephone: 360-236-3148 Group A and B well locations. Water Well Listing Source: Public Utility District Telephone: 206-779-7656 A listing of water well locations in Kitsap County. OTHER STATE DATABASE INFORMATION RADON Area Radon Information Source: USGS Telephone: 703-356-4020 The National Radon Database has been developed by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA) and is a compilation of the EPA/State Residential Radon Survey and the National Residential Radon Survey. The study covers the years 1986 - 1992. Where necessary data has been supplemented by information collected at private sources such as universities and research institutions. EPA Radon Zones Source: EPA Telephone: 703-356-4020 Sections 307 & 309 of IRAA directed EPA to list and identify areas of U.S. with the potential for elevated indoor radon levels. OTHER Airport Landing Facilities: Private and public use landing facilities Source: Federal Aviation Administration, 800-457-6656 Epicenters: World earthquake epicenters, Richter 5 or greater Source: Department of Commerce, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration TC2826208.2s Page A-20 PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE RECORDS SEARCHED STREET AND ADDRESS INFORMATION © 2010 Tele Atlas North America, Inc. All rights reserved. This material is proprietary and the subject of copyright protection and other intellectual property rights owned by or licensed to Tele Atlas North America, Inc. The use of this material is subject to the terms of a license agreement. You will be held liable for any unauthorized copying or disclosure of this material. TC2826208.2s Page A-21 PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE RECORDS SEARCHED   Appendix E Comprehensive Plan Goals, Objectives, and Policies   Sunset Area Community Planned Action  Draft NEPA/SEPA Environmental Impact Statement E‐1 December 2010 ICF 593.10   Appendix E  City of Renton Comprehensive Plan Goals,   Objectives, and Policies  This appendix lists the goals, objectives, and policies of the City’s Comprehensive Plan as they apply  to the following sections of the EIS:   z Land Use  z Aesthetics   z Transportation  z Public Services  Within each section the list is broken down by the Comprehensive Plan element from which it is  excerpted.  City of Renton  Appendix E   Sunset Area Community Planned Action  Draft NEPA/SEPA Environmental Impact Statement E‐2 December 2010 ICF 593.10   Land Use  This section includes goals, objectives, and policies relevant to land use from the Land Use, Housing,  Transportation, Capital Facilities, and Economic Development elements of the City’s Comprehensive  Plan.    Land Use Element    Policy LU­145. Multi‐family unit types are encouraged as part of mixed‐use developments in the Urban  Center, Center Village, Commercial/Office/Residential, and the Commercial Corridor Land Use  designations.  Policy LU­149. Discourage creation of socio‐economic enclaves, especially where lower income units  would be segregated within a development.  Objective LU­MM: Encourage the development of infill parcels with quality projects in existing multi‐ family districts.  Centers  Objective LU­NN: Encourage a wide range and combination of uses, developed at sufficient intensity to  maximize efficient use of land, support transit use, and create a viable district.   Policy LU­183. Promote the innovative site planning and clustering of Center uses and discourage the  development of strip commercial areas.  Policy LU­184. Phase implementation of development within Centers to support economically feasible  development in the short term but also provide a transition to achieve new development consistent with  long term land use objectives.  Policy LU­189. Support new office and commercial development that is more intensive than the older  office and commercial development in existing Centers in order to create more compact and efficient  Centers over time.  Policy LU­190. Allow stand‐alone residential development of various types and urban densities in  portions of Centers not conducive to commercial development…   Policy LU­191. Allow residential uses throughout Centers as part of mixed‐use developments. Consider  bonus incentives for housing types compatible with commercial uses or lower density residential that is  adjacent to Centers.  Policy LU­192. Include uses that are compatible with each other within mixed‐use developments; for  example, office and certain retail uses with residential, office, and retail.  Objective LU­XX: Develop Center Villages, characterized by intense urban development supported by site  planning and infrastructure that provide a pedestrian scale environment.  Policy LU­237. Zone property as Center Village in areas served by transit that are characterized by  existing commercial and multi‐family development that are envisioned to become mixed use, pedestrian  oriented, community centers and serve as a community focal point.  Policy LU­238. Zone property R‐14 within the Center Village land use designation in areas where a  compact mix of housing types (including small lot single family, semi‐attached, and attached housing) is  desired. Ideally, R‐14 areas provide a transition between higher intensity zones within the Center Village  designation and the surrounding land uses.  Policy LU­239. Zone property for Residential Multi‐Family (RMF)…development where existing multi‐ family development exists at the intensity suggested by the zone, or where additional multi‐family  development is desired and can be buffered from lower intensity land uses by the R‐14 zone.  City of Renton  Appendix E   Sunset Area Community Planned Action  Draft NEPA/SEPA Environmental Impact Statement E‐3 December 2010 ICF 593.10   Policy LU­240. Allow residential density ranging from a minimum of 10 to a maximum of 80 dwelling  units per acre in the Center Village designation.  Policy LU­241. Encourage mixed‐use structures and projects.  Policy LU­242. Encourage shared parking to use urban land efficiency.  Policy LU­243. Encourage uses in Center Villages that serve a sub‐regional or citywide market as well as  the surrounding neighborhoods.  Policy LU­244. Encourage more urban style design and intensity of development (e.g. building height,  bulk, landscaping, parking) within Center Villages than with land uses outside the Centers.  Policy LU­245. Promote the clustering of community commercial uses and discourage the development of  strip commercial areas.  Policy LU­246. Residential development within Center Villages is intended to be urban scale, stacked, flat  and/or townhouse development with structured parking.  Policy LU­248. Provide community scale office and service uses.  Housing Element  Objective H­D: Encourage the private sector to provide market rate housing for the widest potential  range of income groups including middle‐ and moderate‐income households.   Objective H­E: Increase housing opportunities for low and very low‐income Renton residents and provide  a fair share of low‐income housing in the future.   Policy H­29. Support proposals for low‐income housing for households earning less than 60 percent of  area median income based on the following criteria:  1) Dispersion of low‐income housing throughout the City.  2) Convenient access to transit for low‐income households.  3) A range of unit types including family housing.  4) Ownership housing when possible.  5) Long‐term affordability.  Policy H­35. Support the housing programs of social service organizations, including the Renton Housing  Authority, that provide opportunities for special needs populations.  Objective H­G. Allow the construction of a variety of housing types affordable to low, moderate, and  middle‐income households when site plans and subdivisions address maintaining the quality of  neighborhoods.  Objective H­M: Develop location designated residential living environments in mixed‐use developments,  as defined in the Land Use Element.   Transportation Element   Goals  1.  Contribute to a balanced multi‐modal transportation system through reasonable, planned,  economically feasible arterial improvements that enhance HOV and transit operations, support  adopted land use plans, protect or improve business access, and protect Renton's neighborhoods.  2.  Maximize the use of transit in Renton by providing step‐by‐step transit improvements to produce  regionally linked and locally oriented transit services and facilities needed to serve travel demand  generated by Renton residents and businesses.   City of Renton  Appendix E   Sunset Area Community Planned Action  Draft NEPA/SEPA Environmental Impact Statement E‐4 December 2010 ICF 593.10   3.  Increase the person‐carrying capacity of the Renton arterial system by the construction of  improvements and the implementation of actions that facilitate the flow of HOVs into, out of, and  through Renton.   4.  Maintain, enhance, and increase pedestrian and bicycle travel by providing both safe and convenient  routes and storage for the commuting and recreating public.  5.  Encourage and facilitate the reduction of commute and other trips made via single occupant vehicles.  8.  Develop a funding and implementation program for needed transportation improvements supporting  adopted land use policies, that distributes transportation costs equitably between public agencies and  private development.   Capital Facilities Element  Policy CFP­2. Level of service standards should be maintained at the current or at a greater level of  service for existing facilities within the City of Renton, which the City has control over.  Policy CFP­3. Adequate public capital facilities should be in place concurrent with development.  Concurrent with development shall mean the existence of adequate facilities, strategies, or services when  development occurs or the existence of a financial commitment to provide adequate facilities, strategies,  or services within six years of when development occurs.  Policy CFP­4. No deterioration of existing levels of service that the City of Renton has control over should  occur due to growth, consistent with Policy CFP‐3.  Economic Development Element  Objective ED­A: Use public resources efficiently to leverage economic development.  Policy ED­1. Fund infrastructure improvements in targeted areas to encourage development and  redevelopment.  Objective ED­B: Expand the retail and office base within the City.  City of Renton  Appendix E   Sunset Area Community Planned Action  Draft NEPA/SEPA Environmental Impact Statement E‐5 December 2010 ICF 593.10   Aesthetics  This section includes objectives and policies relevant to aesthetics from the Community Design  Element of the City’s Comprehensive Plan.    Objective CD­C: Promote reinvestment in and upgrade of existing residential neighborhoods through  redevelopment of small, underutilized parcels with infill development, modification and alteration of older  housing stock, and improvements to streets and sidewalks to increase property values.  Policy CD­11. Support modification of existing commercial and residential structures and site  improvements that implement the current land use policies as reinvestment occurs in neighborhoods.  Such modifications may consist of parking lot design, landscaping renovation, new coordinated signage,  and site plan/building alterations that update structures to contemporary standards.   Policy CD­12. Sidewalks or walking paths should be provided along streets in established neighborhoods,  where sidewalks have not been previously constructed. Sidewalk width should be ample to safely and  comfortably accommodate pedestrian traffic and, where practical, match existing sidewalks.  Policy CD­14. Infill development, defined as new short plats of nine or fewer lots, should be encouraged in  order to add variety, update housing stock, and increase vitality of neighborhoods.  Policy CD­15. Infill development should be reflective of the existing character of established  neighborhoods even when designed using different architectural styles, and /or responding to more urban  setbacks, height or lot requirements. Infill development should draw on elements of existing development  such as placement of structures, vegetation, and location of entries and walkways, to reflect the site  planning and scale of existing areas.  Policy CD­18. Architecture of new structures in established areas should be visually compatible with  other structures on the site and with adjacent development.  Visual compatibility should be evaluated using the following criteria:  a) Where there are differences in height (e.g., new two‐story development adjacent to single‐story  structures), the architecture of the new structure should include details and elements of design  such as window treatment, roof type, entries, or porches that reduce the visual mass of the  structure.  b) Garages, whether attached or detached, should be constructed using the same pattern of  development established in the vicinity.  c) Structures should have entries, windows, and doors located to maintain privacy in neighboring  yards and buildings.  Objective CD­E: New development and infill patterns should be consistent with a high quality urban form.  Policy CD­34. Support project site planning in Residential land use designations that incorporates the  following, or similar elements, in order to meet the intent of the objective:  1) Buildings oriented toward public streets,  2) Private open space for ground‐related units,  3) Common open or green space in sufficient amount to be useful,  4) Preferably underground parking or structured parking located under the residential building,  5) Surface parking, if necessary, to be located to the side or rear of the residential building(s),  6) Landscaping of all pervious areas of the property, and  7) Landscaping, consisting of groundcover and street trees (at a minimum), of all setbacks and  rights‐of way abutting the property.   Policy CD­35. Support commercial and industrial development plans incorporating the following features:  City of Renton  Appendix E   Sunset Area Community Planned Action  Draft NEPA/SEPA Environmental Impact Statement E‐6 December 2010 ICF 593.10   1) Shared access points and fewer curb cuts;  2) More than one use into a single development;  3) Properties in more than one ownership;  4) Internal circulation among adjacent parcels;  5) Buildings that front on the street with service and parking areas located behind the building  and/or screen from front views;  6) Shared facilities for parking, transit, recreation, and amenities;  7) Allowance for future transition to structured parking facilities;  8) Centralized signage;  9) Unified development concepts; and  10) Landscaping and streetscape that softens visual impacts.  Policy CD­36. Developments within Commercial and Centers land use designations should have a  combination of internal and external site design features, such as:  1) Public plazas;  2) Prominent architectural features;  3) Public access to natural features or views;  4) Distinctive focal features;  5) Indication of the function as a gateway, if appropriate;  6) Structured parking; and  7) Other features meeting the spirit and intent of the land use designation.  Policy CD­40. Use design regulations to provide direction on site design, building design, landscape  treatments, and parking and circulation.  Policy CD­42. Site design should address the effects of light, glare, noise, vegetation removal, and traffic in  residential areas. Overall development densities may be reduced within the allowed density range to  mitigate potential adverse impacts.  Objective CD­I: Protect and enhance public views of distinctive features from public streets and other  focal points within the City and the surrounding area.  Policy CD­64. Scenic views and view corridors along roadways in the City should be identified and  preserved through application of development standards.  Policy CD­65. Access from public roadways to views of features of distinction should be enhanced  through the development of public viewpoints where appropriate.  Policy CD­66. Neighborhood identity should be established by featuring views, highlighting landmarks, or  creating focal points of distinction.  Policy CD­67. Focal points should have a combination of public areas, such as parks or plazas;  architectural features, such as towers, outstanding building design, transit stops, or outdoor eating areas;  and landscaped areas. These features should be connected to pedestrian pathways.  Objective CD­J: Architecture should be distinctive and contribute to the community aesthetic.   Policy CD­68. Structures should be designed (e.g. building height, orientation, materials, color and bulk)  to mitigate potential adverse impacts, such as glare or shadows on adjacent less intense land uses and  transportation corridors.   Policy CD­69. Rooftops that can be seen from higher elevations, taller buildings, and public streets, parks,  or open space should be designed to hide mechanical equipment and to incorporate high‐quality roofing  materials.   City of Renton  Appendix E   Sunset Area Community Planned Action  Draft NEPA/SEPA Environmental Impact Statement E‐7 December 2010 ICF 593.10   Policy CD­70. Design characteristics in larger, new developments or individual building complexes should  contribute to neighborhood and/or district identity.  Objective CD­L: New commercial and industrial buildings should be architecturally compatible with their  surroundings in terms of their bulk and scale, exterior materials, and color when existing development is  consistent with the adopted land use vision and Purpose Statements for each Commercial, Center  Designation, and Employment Area in the Comprehensive Plan Land Use Element, Center and Commercial  Policies.  Policy CD­75. A variety of architectural design and detailing should be encouraged and innovative use of  building materials and finishes should be promoted.  Policy CD­76. Development should provide appropriate landscaping and façade treatment when located  along designated City arterials or adjacent to less intense developments in order to mitigate potentially  adverse visual or other impacts.  Policy CD­78. Encourage a variety of architectural treatments and styles to create an urban environment.   Objective CD­O: Promote development of attractive, walkable neighborhoods and shopping areas by  ensuring that streets are safe, convenient, and pleasant for pedestrians.  Policy CD­96. Aesthetic improvements along street frontages should be provided, especially for  properties abutting major streets and boulevards. Incentives should be provided for the inclusion of  streetscape amenities including: landscaping, public art, street furniture, paving, signs, and planting strips  in developing and redeveloping areas.   Policy CD­97. Require significant pedestrian element in internal site circulation plans.  Policy CD­99. Commercial Corridor intersections frequented by pedestrians, due to the nature of nearby  uses or transit stops, should feature sidewalk pavement increased to form pedestrian corners and include  pedestrian amenities, signage, and special design treatment that would make them identifiable as activity  areas for the larger corridor.   Policy CD­101: Criteria should be developed to locate pedestrian and bicycle connections in the City.  Criteria should consider:    Linking residential areas with employment and commercial areas;  a) Providing access along arterials;  b) Providing access within residential areas;  c) Filling gaps in the existing sidewalk system where appropriate; and  d) Providing access through open spaces and building entries to shorten walking distances.  Policy CD­103. Landscaped parking strips should be considered for use as a safety buffer between  pedestrians and moving vehicles along arterials and collector streets.  Policy CD­104. Intersections should be designed to minimize pedestrian crossing distance and increase  safety for disabled pedestrians.  Policy CD­108. To visually improve the streetscape, increase the safety of perimeter sidewalks, and  facilitate off‐street parking, construction of alleys providing rear access to service entries and garages  should be encouraged. Alleys are preferred in small‐lot subdivisions to provide higher quality site  planning that allows garage access from the rear and reduces curb cuts and building mass on narrow lots.  Policy CD­109. Sidewalks or walking paths should be provided along residential streets. Sidewalk width  should be ample to safely and comfortably accommodate pedestrian traffic.  Policy CD­110. Street trees should be used to reinforce visual corridors along major boulevards and  streets.   Policy CD­112. Appearance of parking lots should be improved by screening through appropriate  combinations of landscaping, fencing, and berms.   City of Renton  Appendix E   Sunset Area Community Planned Action  Draft NEPA/SEPA Environmental Impact Statement E‐8 December 2010 ICF 593.10   Objective CD­R: Lighting systems in public rights‐of‐way should be provided to improve safety, aid in  direction finding, and provide information for commercial and other business purposes. Excess lighting  beyond what is necessary should be avoided.  Policy CD­123. All exterior lighting should be focused and directed away from adjacent properties and  wildlife habitat to prevent spillover or glare.  Policy CD­125. Lighting fixtures should be attractively designed to complement the architecture of a  development, the site, and adjacent buildings.  Policy CD­126. Lighting within commercial and public areas should be located and designed to enhance  security and encourage nighttime use by pedestrians.  City of Renton  Appendix E   Sunset Area Community Planned Action  Draft NEPA/SEPA Environmental Impact Statement E‐9 December 2010 ICF 593.10   Transportation  This section includes goals relevant to transportation from the Transportation Element of the City’s  Comprehensive Plan.  Transportation Element  Goals  1.  Contribute to a balanced multi‐modal transportation system through reasonable, planned,  economically feasible arterial improvements that enhance HOV and transit operations,  support adopted land use plans, protect or improve business access, and protect Renton's  neighborhoods.  2.  Maximize the use of transit in Renton by providing step‐by‐step transit improvements to  produce regionally linked and locally oriented transit services and facilities needed to serve  travel demand generated by Renton residents and businesses.    4.  Maintain, enhance, and increase pedestrian and bicycle travel by providing both safe and  convenient routes and storage for the commuting and recreating public.  9.  Develop a transportation system that contributes to the attainment and maintenance of  regional air and water quality standards within the City of Renton, and complies with  regional, state, and Federal air water quality standards, and preserves/protects natural  resources.      City of Renton  Appendix E   Sunset Area Community Planned Action  Draft NEPA/SEPA Environmental Impact Statement E‐10 December 2010 ICF 593.10   Public Services   This section includes objectives and policies relevant to public services from the Land Use and  Capital Facilities elements of the City’s Comprehensive Plan.    Land Use Element  Public Facilities  Objective LU­R: Locate and plan for public facilities in ways that benefit a broad range of potential public  uses.  Policy LU­83. Support incorporation of public facilities such as schools, museums, medical offices, and  government offices into redevelopment efforts by developing a public/private partnership with  developers and other Renton stakeholders such as the school district, technical college, and hospital  district.  Objective LU­S: Site and design municipal facilities to provide the most efficient and convenient service  for people while minimizing adverse impacts on surrounding uses.  Policy LU­89. Future fire stations should be sited central to their service area with as few barriers as  possible in order to achieve best possible response times.  Policy LU­90. Land for future fire stations should be acquired in advance in areas where the greatest  amount of development is anticipated.  Policy LU­91. Site and building design of police facilities providing direct service to the general public  should be easily accessible.  Policy LU­92. Major functions of the police should be centralized in or near the Urban Center.  Policy LU­93. Satellite police facilities may be located outside of the Urban Center.   Policy LU­98. When branch libraries are developed, they should be located to provide convenient access  to a majority of their users.  Policy LU­99. Future branch libraries and other satellite services may be located in mixed‐use  developments to serve concentrations of users in those areas.  Policy LU­103. The City and the school district should jointly develop multiple‐use facilities (e.g.  playgrounds, sports fields) whenever practical.  Policy LU­104. Community use of school sites and facilities for non‐school activities should be  encouraged.  Policy LU­105. School facilities that are planned for closure, should be considered for potential public use  before being sold for private development.  Objective LU­W: Assure that adequate land and infrastructure are available for the development and  expansion of facilities to serve the health care needs of the area.  Capital Facilities Element  Policy CFP­1. The Capital Facilities Plan should be updated on a regular basis as part of the city's budget  process, and such update may include adjustments to growth projections for the ensuing six years, to level  of service standards, to the list of needed facilities, or to anticipated funding sources. For the purpose of  capital facilities planning, plan for forecast growth at the high end of the projected range and targeted  growth as a minimum.  Policy CFP­2. Level of service standards should be maintained at the current or at a greater level of  service for existing facilities within the City of Renton, which the City has control over.  City of Renton  Appendix E   Sunset Area Community Planned Action  Draft NEPA/SEPA Environmental Impact Statement E‐11 December 2010 ICF 593.10   Policy CFP­3. Adequate public capital facilities should be in place concurrent with development.  Concurrent with development shall mean the existence of adequate facilities, strategies, or services when  development occurs or the existence of a financial commitment to provide adequate facilities, strategies,  or services within six years of when development occurs.  Policy CFP­4. No deterioration of existing levels of service that the City of Renton has control over should  occur due to growth, consistent with Policy CFP‐3.  Policy CFP­5. Funding for new, improved, or expanded public facilities or services should come from a  mix of sources in order to distribute the cost of such facilities or services according to use, need, and  adopted goals and policies.  Policy CFP­6. Evaluate levying impact fees on development for municipal services and/or school district  services upon the request of each school district within the City limits, if a compelling need is established  through means such as presentation of an adopted Capital Facilities Plan and demonstration that such  facilities are needed to accommodate projected growth and equitably distributed throughout the district.  Policy CFP­9. Adopt by reference the most current Renton School District #403 Capital Facilities Plan and  adopt an implementing ordinance establishing a school impact fee consistent with the District’s adopted  Capital Facilities Plan.  Policy CFP­10. Support private/public partnerships to plan and finance infrastructure development,  public uses, structured parking and community amenities to stimulate additional private investment and  produce a more urban environment.      Appendix  F  Transportation Data and Analysis        Greenroads Sustainability Performance MetricALTERNATIVE 2No. Title PointsPR-1 Environmental Review Process Req IncludedXNot Included TBI TBDPR-2 Lufe Cycle Cost Analysis (LCCA) Req Included Not Included TBI TBDXPR-3 Life Cycle Inventory (LCI) Req Included Not Included TBI TBDXPR-4 Quality Control Plan Req Included Not Included TBIXTBDPR-5 Noise Mitigation Plan Req Included Not Included TBIXTBDPR-6 Waste Management Plan Req Included Not Included TBI TBDXPR-7 Pollution Prevention Plan Req Included Not Included TBIXTBDPR-8 Low-Impact Development (LID) Req Included Not Included TBIXTBDPR-9 Pavement Management System Req Included Not Included TBI TBDXPR 10Site Maintenance PlanReqIncludedNot IncludedTBITBDXImprovementsProject Requirements (PR)PR-10Site Maintenance PlanReqIncludedNot IncludedTBITBDXPR-11 Educational Outreach Req IncludedXNot Included TBI TBDEW-1 Environmental Management System 2 Included Not Included TBI TBDEW-2 Runoff Flow Control 3 IncludedXNot Included TBI TBDEW-3 Runoff Quality 3 IncludedXNot Included TBI TBDEW-4 Stormwater Cost Analysis 1 Included Not Included TBIXTBDEW-5 Site Vegetation 3 IncludedXNot Included TBI TBDEW-6 Habit Restoration 3 Included Not IncludedXTBI TBDEW-7 Ecological Connectivity 3 Included Not Included TBI TBDXEW-8 Light Pollution 3 Included Not Included TBI TBDXEW Subtotal: 21 916Environment & Water (EW) No. Title PointsImprovementsAE-1 Safety Audit 2 IncludedXNot Included TBI TBDAE-2 Intelligent Transportation Systems (ITS) 5 IncludedXNot Included TBI TBDAE-3 Context Sensititve Planning 5 IncludedXNot Included TBI TBDAE-4 Traffic Emissions Reduction 5 Included Not IncludedXTBI TBDAE-5 Pedestrian Access 2 IncludedXNot Included TBI TBDAE-6 Bicycle Access 2 IncludedXNot Included TBI TBDAE-7 Transit/HOV Access 5 IncludedXNot Included TBI TBDAE-8 Scenic Views 2 Included Not IncludedXTBI TBDAE-9 Cultural Warranty 2 IncludedXNot Included TBI TBDAE Subtotal: 30 23CA-1 Quality Management System 2 Included Not Included TBI TBDXCA-2 Environmental Training 1 Included Not Included TBI TBDXCA-3 Site Recycle Plan 1 Included Not Included TBI TBDXCA-4 Fossil Fuel Use Reduction 2 Included Not Included TBI TBDXAccess & Equity (AE)Construction Activities (CA)CA-5 Equipment Emission Reduction 2 Included Not Included TBI TBDXCA-6 Paver Emission Reduction 1 Included Not Included TBI TBDXCA-7 Water Use Tracking 2 Included Not Included TBI TBDXCA-8 Contractor Warranty 3 Included Not Included TBI TBDXCA Subtotal: 1414MR-1 Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) 2 Included Not Included TBI TBDXMR-2 Pavement Reuse 5 Included Not Included TBI TBDXMR-3 Earthwork Balance 1 Included Not Included TBI TBDXMR-4 Recycled Materials 5 Included Not Included TBI TBDXMR-5 Regional Materials 5 Included Not Included TBI TBDXMR-6 Energy Efficiency 5 Included Not Included TBI TBDXMaterials & Resources (MR) No. Title PointsImprovementsMR Subtotal: 2323PT-1 Long-Life Pavement 5 Included Not Included TBI TBDXPT-2 Permeable Pavement 3 Included Not Included TBI TBDXPT-3 Warm Mix Asphalt (WMA) 3 Included Not Included TBI TBDXPT-4 Cool Pavement 5 Included Not Included TBI TBDXPT-5 Quiet Pavement 3 Included Not Included TBI TBDXPT-6 Pavement Performance Tracking 1 Included Not IncludedXTBI TBDPT Total: 2019CC-1 Custom Credits 10 Included Not Included TBI TBDXCC Subtotal: 1010Greenroads Total: 118 33 included or TBI and 66 TBDCustom Credits (CC)Pavemnet Technologies (PT) Greenroads Sustainability Performance MetricALTERNATIVE 3No. Title PointsPR-1 Environmental Review Process Req IncludedXNot Included TBI TBDPR-2 Lufe Cycle Cost Analysis (LCCA) Req Included Not Included TBI TBDXPR-3 Life Cycle Inventory (LCI) Req Included Not Included TBI TBDXPR-4 Quality Control Plan Req Included Not Included TBIXTBDPR-5 Noise Mitigation Plan Req Included Not Included TBIXTBDPR-6 Waste Management Plan Req Included Not Included TBI TBDXPR-7 Pollution Prevention Plan Req Included Not Included TBIXTBDPR-8 Low-Impact Development (LID) Req Included Not Included TBIXTBDPR-9 Pavement Management System Req Included Not Included TBI TBDXPR 10Site Maintenance PlanReqIncludedNot IncludedTBITBDXImprovementsProject Requirements (PR)PR-10Site Maintenance PlanReqIncludedNot IncludedTBITBDXPR-11 Educational Outreach Req IncludedXNot Included TBI TBDEW-1 Environmental Management System 2 Included Not Included TBI TBDEW-2 Runoff Flow Control 3 IncludedXNot Included TBI TBDEW-3 Runoff Quality 3 IncludedXNot Included TBI TBDEW-4 Stormwater Cost Analysis 1 Included Not Included TBIXTBDEW-5 Site Vegetation 3 IncludedXNot Included TBI TBDEW-6 Habit Restoration 3 Included Not IncludedXTBI TBDEW-7 Ecological Connectivity 3 Included Not Included TBI TBDXEW-8 Light Pollution 3 Included Not Included TBI TBDXEW Subtotal: 21 916Environment & Water (EW) No. Title PointsImprovementsAE-1 Safety Audit 2 IncludedXNot Included TBI TBDAE-2 Intelligent Transportation Systems (ITS) 5 IncludedXNot Included TBI TBDAE-3 Context Sensititve Planning 5 IncludedXNot Included TBI TBDAE-4 Traffic Emissions Reduction 5 Included Not IncludedXTBI TBDAE-5 Pedestrian Access 2 IncludedXNot Included TBI TBDAE-6 Bicycle Access 2 IncludedXNot Included TBI TBDAE-7 Transit/HOV Access 5 IncludedXNot Included TBI TBDAE-8 Scenic Views 2 Included Not IncludedXTBI TBDAE-9 Cultural Warranty 2 IncludedXNot Included TBI TBDAE Subtotal: 30 23CA-1 Quality Management System 2 Included Not Included TBI TBDXCA-2 Environmental Training 1 Included Not Included TBI TBDXCA-3 Site Recycle Plan 1 Included Not Included TBI TBDXCA-4 Fossil Fuel Use Reduction 2 Included Not Included TBI TBDXAccess & Equity (AE)Construction Activities (CA)CA-5 Equipment Emission Reduction 2 Included Not Included TBI TBDXCA-6 Paver Emission Reduction 1 Included Not Included TBI TBDXCA-7 Water Use Tracking 2 Included Not Included TBI TBDXCA-8 Contractor Warranty 3 Included Not Included TBI TBDXCA Subtotal: 1414MR-1 Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) 2 Included Not Included TBI TBDXMR-2 Pavement Reuse 5 Included Not Included TBI TBDXMR-3 Earthwork Balance 1 Included Not Included TBI TBDXMR-4 Recycled Materials 5 Included Not Included TBI TBDXMR-5 Regional Materials 5 Included Not Included TBI TBDXMR-6 Energy Efficiency 5 Included Not Included TBI TBDXMaterials & Resources (MR) No. Title PointsImprovementsMR Subtotal: 2323PT-1 Long-Life Pavement 5 Included Not Included TBI TBDXPT-2 Permeable Pavement 3 Included Not Included TBI TBDXPT-3 Warm Mix Asphalt (WMA) 3 Included Not Included TBI TBDXPT-4 Cool Pavement 5 Included Not Included TBI TBDXPT-5 Quiet Pavement 3 Included Not Included TBI TBDXPT-6 Pavement Performance Tracking 1 Included Not IncludedXTBI TBDPT Total: 2019CC-1 Custom Credits 10 Included Not Included TBI TBDXCC Subtotal: 1010Greenroads Total: 118 33 included or TBI and 66 TBDPavemnet Technologies (PT)Custom Credits (CC) HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 1: NE Sunset Blvd./NE Park & NE Sunset Blvd.10/16/2010 No Action PM (2015)Synchro 7 - Report Sunset Area Planned EIS Page 1 Movement EBT EBR WBL WBT NBL NBR Lane Configurations Volume (vph) 1485 84 167 994 57 223 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Total Lost time (s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 Lane Util. Factor 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 Frt 0.99 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.85 Flt Protected 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 Satd. Flow (prot) 3506 1770 3539 1770 1583 Flt Permitted 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 Satd. Flow (perm) 3506 1770 3539 1770 1583 Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.99 0.83 0.81 0.95 0.78 0.85 Adj. Flow (vph) 1500 101 206 1046 73 262 RTOR Reduction (vph)50000231 Lane Group Flow (vph) 1596 0 206 1046 73 31 Turn Type Prot Prot Protected Phases 2 1644 Permitted Phases Actuated Green, G (s) 44.5 14.0 62.5 8.5 8.5 Effective Green, g (s) 46.5 15.0 64.5 9.5 9.5 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.58 0.19 0.81 0.12 0.12 Clearance Time (s) 5.0 4.0 5.0 4.0 4.0 Vehicle Extension (s) 5.0 3.0 5.0 3.0 3.0 Lane Grp Cap (vph) 2038 332 2853 210 188 v/s Ratio Prot c0.46 c0.12 0.30 c0.04 0.02 v/s Ratio Perm v/c Ratio 0.78 0.62 0.37 0.35 0.17 Uniform Delay, d1 12.9 29.9 2.1 32.4 31.7 Progression Factor 0.38 0.68 0.06 1.00 1.00 Incremental Delay, d2 2.6 3.2 0.3 1.0 0.4 Delay (s) 7.5 23.4 0.5 33.4 32.1 Level of Service A C A C C Approach Delay (s) 7.5 4.2 32.4 Approach LOS A A C Intersection Summary HCM Average Control Delay 8.8 HCM Level of Service A HCM Volume to Capacity ratio 0.69 Actuated Cycle Length (s) 80.0 Sum of lost time (s) 9.0 Intersection Capacity Utilization 67.1% ICU Level of Service C Analysis Period (min) 15 c Critical Lane Group HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 2: NE Sunset Blvd & Edmonds AV NE 10/16/2010 No Action PM (2015)Synchro 7 - Report Sunset Area Planned EIS Page 2 Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations Volume (vph) 140 1357 92 44 914 8 54 26 30 6 42 119 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Lane Width 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 11 12 12 11 12 Total Lost time (s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 Lane Util. Factor 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Frt 1.00 0.99 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.93 1.00 0.90 Flt Protected 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 Satd. Flow (prot) 1770 3495 1770 3532 1770 1677 1770 1614 Flt Permitted 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.33 1.00 0.66 1.00 Satd. Flow (perm) 1770 3495 1770 3532 618 1677 1230 1614 Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.85 0.95 0.71 0.86 0.89 0.58 0.84 0.52 0.72 0.63 0.66 0.84 Adj. Flow (vph) 165 1428 130 51 1027 14 64 50 42 10 64 142 RTOR Reduction (vph)050010036001200 Lane Group Flow (vph) 165 1553 0 51 1040 0 64 56 0 10 86 0 Turn Type Prot Prot Perm Perm Protected Phases 1 6 5 2 4 4 Permitted Phases 4 4 Actuated Green, G (s) 15.6 50.4 5.4 40.2 11.2 11.2 11.2 11.2 Effective Green, g (s) 16.6 52.4 6.4 42.2 12.2 12.2 12.2 12.2 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.21 0.65 0.08 0.53 0.15 0.15 0.15 0.15 Clearance Time (s) 4.0 5.0 4.0 5.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 Vehicle Extension (s) 4.0 6.0 4.0 6.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 Lane Grp Cap (vph) 367 2289 142 1863 94 256 188 246 v/s Ratio Prot 0.09 c0.44 0.03 c0.29 0.03 0.05 v/s Ratio Perm c0.10 0.01 v/c Ratio 0.45 0.68 0.36 0.56 0.68 0.22 0.05 0.35 Uniform Delay, d1 27.7 8.6 34.9 12.7 32.1 29.7 29.0 30.3 Progression Factor 0.89 0.69 1.14 0.53 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Incremental Delay, d2 0.8 1.1 2.0 1.1 19.8 0.6 0.2 1.2 Delay (s) 25.5 7.0 41.6 7.8 51.9 30.3 29.1 31.5 Level of Service C A D A D C C C Approach Delay (s) 8.8 9.4 39.2 31.4 Approach LOS A A D C Intersection Summary HCM Average Control Delay 12.0 HCM Level of Service B HCM Volume to Capacity ratio 0.67 Actuated Cycle Length (s) 80.0 Sum of lost time (s) 9.0 Intersection Capacity Utilization 70.0% ICU Level of Service C Analysis Period (min) 15 c Critical Lane Group HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 3: NE Sunset Blvd & Harrington AV NE 10/16/2010 No Action PM (2015)Synchro 7 - Report Sunset Area Planned EIS Page 3 Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations Volume (vph) 24 1300 49 75 1041 3 41 9 76 9 18 22 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Total Lost time (s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 Lane Util. Factor 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 Frt 1.00 0.99 1.00 1.00 0.92 0.94 Flt Protected 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.99 0.99 Satd. Flow (prot) 1770 3515 1770 3535 1685 1736 Flt Permitted 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.90 0.92 Satd. Flow (perm) 1770 3515 1770 3535 1545 1615 Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.75 0.90 0.72 0.86 0.92 0.38 0.90 0.50 0.75 0.67 0.57 0.59 Adj. Flow (vph) 32 1444 68 87 1132 8 46 18 101 13 32 37 RTOR Reduction (vph)03000008700320 Lane Group Flow (vph) 32 1509 0 87 1140 0 0 78 0 0 50 0 Turn Type Prot Prot Perm Perm Protected Phases 1 6 5 2 4 4 Permitted Phases 4 4 Actuated Green, G (s) 2.4 49.9 7.2 54.7 9.9 9.9 Effective Green, g (s) 3.4 51.9 8.2 56.7 10.9 10.9 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.04 0.65 0.10 0.71 0.14 0.14 Clearance Time (s) 4.0 5.0 4.0 5.0 4.0 4.0 Vehicle Extension (s) 4.0 6.0 4.0 6.0 4.0 4.0 Lane Grp Cap (vph) 75 2280 181 2505 211 220 v/s Ratio Prot 0.02 c0.43 c0.05 c0.32 v/s Ratio Perm c0.05 0.03 v/c Ratio 0.43 0.66 0.48 0.45 0.37 0.23 Uniform Delay, d1 37.3 8.6 33.9 5.0 31.4 30.8 Progression Factor 0.72 0.25 0.64 0.70 1.00 1.00 Incremental Delay, d2 4.2 1.2 2.3 0.5 1.5 0.7 Delay (s) 30.9 3.4 23.8 4.0 32.9 31.5 Level of Service C A C A C C Approach Delay (s) 3.9 5.4 32.9 31.5 Approach LOS A A C C Intersection Summary HCM Average Control Delay 6.9 HCM Level of Service A HCM Volume to Capacity ratio 0.58 Actuated Cycle Length (s) 80.0 Sum of lost time (s) 6.0 Intersection Capacity Utilization 64.4% ICU Level of Service C Analysis Period (min) 15 c Critical Lane Group HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 4: NE 10th St & NE Sunset Blvd 10/16/2010 No Action PM (2015)Synchro 7 - Report Sunset Area Planned EIS Page 4 Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations Volume (vph) 15 50 26 117 39 38 44 1129 155 69 1006 8 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Total Lost time (s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 Lane Util. Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 Frt 0.96 0.97 1.00 0.98 1.00 1.00 Flt Protected 0.99 0.97 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 Satd. Flow (prot) 1778 1756 1770 3462 1770 3535 Flt Permitted 0.92 0.75 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 Satd. Flow (perm) 1654 1349 1770 3462 1770 3535 Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.65 0.92 0.96 0.67 0.77 0.63 0.68 0.96 0.77 0.83 0.94 0.88 Adj. Flow (vph) 23 54 27 175 51 60 65 1176 201 83 1070 9 RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 17 0 0 12 0 0 15 0000 Lane Group Flow (vph) 0 87 0 0 274 0 65 1362 0 83 1079 0 Turn Type Perm Perm Prot Prot Protected Phases 4 4 1 6 5 2 Permitted Phases 4 4 4 Actuated Green, G (s) 20.6 20.6 4.8 39.1 7.3 41.6 Effective Green, g (s) 21.6 21.6 5.8 41.1 8.3 43.6 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.27 0.27 0.07 0.51 0.10 0.55 Clearance Time (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 5.0 4.0 5.0 Vehicle Extension (s) 5.0 5.0 4.0 5.0 4.0 5.0 Lane Grp Cap (vph) 447 364 128 1779 184 1927 v/s Ratio Prot 0.04 c0.39 0.05 c0.31 v/s Ratio Perm 0.05 c0.20 v/c Ratio 0.20 0.75 0.51 0.77 0.45 0.56 Uniform Delay, d1 22.5 26.7 35.7 15.6 33.7 11.9 Progression Factor 0.99 1.00 0.60 0.30 1.32 0.79 Incremental Delay, d2 0.4 10.0 3.4 2.6 2.1 1.0 Delay (s) 22.7 36.8 25.0 7.3 46.7 10.5 Level of Service C D C A D B Approach Delay (s) 22.7 36.8 8.1 13.1 Approach LOS C D A B Intersection Summary HCM Average Control Delay 13.3 HCM Level of Service B HCM Volume to Capacity ratio 0.74 Actuated Cycle Length (s) 80.0 Sum of lost time (s) 9.0 Intersection Capacity Utilization 67.5% ICU Level of Service C Analysis Period (min) 15 c Critical Lane Group HCM Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 5: NE Sunset Blvd & Kirkland Ave NE 10/16/2010 No Action PM (2015)Synchro 7 - Report Sunset Area Planned EIS Page 5 Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations Volume (veh/h) 65 1118 7 21 849 3 10 3 28 0 3 86 Sign Control Free Free Stop Stop Grade 0% 0% 0% 0% Peak Hour Factor 0.79 0.90 0.50 0.50 0.90 0.25 0.75 0.25 0.33 0.90 0.25 0.63 Hourly flow rate (vph) 82 1242 14 42 943 12 13 12 85 0 12 137 Pedestrians Lane Width (ft) Walking Speed (ft/s) Percent Blockage Right turn flare (veh) Median type None None Median storage veh) Upstream signal (ft) 1086 344 pX, platoon unblocked 0.79 0.76 0.86 0.86 0.76 0.86 0.86 0.79 vC, conflicting volume 955 1256 2112 2453 628 1910 2454 478 vC1, stage 1 conf vol vC2, stage 2 conf vol vCu, unblocked vol 418 705 887 1282 0 653 1283 0 tC, single (s) 4.1 4.1 7.5 6.5 6.9 7.5 6.5 6.9 tC, 2 stage (s) tF (s) 2.2 2.2 3.5 4.0 3.3 3.5 4.0 3.3 p0 queue free % 91 94 91 90 90 100 90 84 cM capacity (veh/h) 901 675 142 121 824 224 121 859 Direction, Lane # EB 1 EB 2 EB 3 WB 1 WB 2 WB 3 NB 1 SB 1 Volume Total 82 828 428 42 629 326 110 149 Volume Left 82 0 0 42 0 0 13 0 Volume Right 0 0 14 0 0 12 85 137 cSH 901 1700 1700 675 1700 1700 372 574 Volume to Capacity 0.09 0.49 0.25 0.06 0.37 0.19 0.30 0.26 Queue Length 95th (ft)8005003026 Control Delay (s) 9.4 0.0 0.0 10.7 0.0 0.0 18.7 13.4 Lane LOS A B C B Approach Delay (s) 0.6 0.4 18.7 13.4 Approach LOS C B Intersection Summary Average Delay 2.0 Intersection Capacity Utilization 53.6% ICU Level of Service A Analysis Period (min) 15 HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 6: NE 12th St & NE Sunset Blvd 10/16/2010 No Action PM (2015)Synchro 7 - Report Sunset Area Planned EIS Page 6 Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations Volume (vph) 186 157 11 88 85 49 29 1002 115 77 773 143 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Lane Width 12 11 12 12 11 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 Total Lost time (s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 Lane Util. Factor 0.95 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 Frt 0.99 0.96 1.00 0.98 1.00 0.97 Flt Protected 0.98 0.98 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 Satd. Flow (prot) 3318 3222 1770 3480 1770 3449 Flt Permitted 0.98 0.98 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 Satd. Flow (perm) 3318 3222 1770 3480 1770 3449 Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.92 0.82 0.63 0.77 0.84 0.63 0.78 0.94 0.86 0.76 0.91 0.82 Adj. Flow (vph) 202 191 17 114 101 78 37 1066 134 101 849 174 RTOR Reduction (vph)040050001100180 Lane Group Flow (vph) 0 406 0 0 243 0 37 1189 0 101 1005 0 Turn Type Split Split Prot Prot Protected Phases 4 4 3 3 1 6 5 2 Permitted Phases Actuated Green, G (s) 15.0 11.1 4.4 31.3 5.6 32.5 Effective Green, g (s) 16.0 12.1 5.4 33.3 6.6 34.5 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.20 0.15 0.07 0.42 0.08 0.43 Clearance Time (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 5.0 4.0 5.0 Vehicle Extension (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 Lane Grp Cap (vph) 664 487 119 1449 146 1487 v/s Ratio Prot c0.12 c0.08 0.02 c0.34 0.06 c0.29 v/s Ratio Perm v/c Ratio 0.61 0.50 0.31 0.82 0.69 0.68 Uniform Delay, d1 29.2 31.2 35.5 20.7 35.7 18.3 Progression Factor 1.00 1.00 1.18 0.43 1.00 1.00 Incremental Delay, d2 1.9 1.1 1.5 4.1 14.2 2.5 Delay (s) 31.1 32.3 43.4 12.9 49.9 20.7 Level of Service C C D B D C Approach Delay (s) 31.1 32.3 13.9 23.4 Approach LOS C C B C Intersection Summary HCM Average Control Delay 21.4 HCM Level of Service C HCM Volume to Capacity ratio 0.69 Actuated Cycle Length (s) 80.0 Sum of lost time (s) 9.0 Intersection Capacity Utilization 65.7% ICU Level of Service C Analysis Period (min) 15 c Critical Lane Group HCM Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 7: NE Sunset Blvd & Monroe Ave NE 10/16/2010 No Action PM (2015)Synchro 7 - Report Sunset Area Planned EIS Page 7 Movement EBT EBR WBL WBT NBL NBR Lane Configurations Volume (veh/h) 1224 14 3 993 0 17 Sign Control Free Free Stop Grade 0% 0% 0% Peak Hour Factor 0.90 0.50 0.25 0.90 0.90 0.63 Hourly flow rate (vph) 1360 28 12 1103 0 27 Pedestrians Lane Width (ft) Walking Speed (ft/s) Percent Blockage Right turn flare (veh) 2 Median type None None Median storage veh) Upstream signal (ft) 1166 pX, platoon unblocked 0.74 0.74 0.74 vC, conflicting volume 1388 1950 694 vC1, stage 1 conf vol vC2, stage 2 conf vol vCu, unblocked vol 814 1576 0 tC, single (s) 4.1 6.8 6.9 tC, 2 stage (s) tF (s) 2.2 3.5 3.3 p0 queue free % 98 100 97 cM capacity (veh/h) 596 73 800 Direction, Lane # EB 1 EB 2 WB 1 WB 2 WB 3 NB 1 Volume Total 907 481 12 552 552 27 Volume Left 0 0 12 0 0 0 Volume Right 0 28 0 0 0 27 cSH 1700 1700 596 1700 1700 400 Volume to Capacity 0.53 0.28 0.02 0.32 0.32 0.07 Queue Length 95th (ft)002005 Control Delay (s) 0.0 0.0 11.2 0.0 0.0 14.7 Lane LOS B B Approach Delay (s) 0.0 0.1 14.7 Approach LOS B Intersection Summary Average Delay 0.2 Intersection Capacity Utilization 44.3% ICU Level of Service A Analysis Period (min) 15 HCM Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 8: NE 12th St & Edmonds AV NE 10/16/2010 No Action PM (2015)Synchro 7 - Report Sunset Area Planned EIS Page 8 Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations Sign Control Stop Stop Stop Stop Volume (vph) 3 45 6 44 53 239 14 153 56 373 118 8 Peak Hour Factor 0.82 0.82 0.82 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.91 0.91 0.91 Hourly flow rate (vph) 4 55 7 47 57 257 15 163 60 410 130 9 Direction, Lane # EB 1 WB 1 NB 1 NB 2 SB 1 Volume Total (vph) 66 361 178 60 548 Volume Left (vph) 4 47 15 0 410 Volume Right (vph) 7 257 0 60 9 Hadj (s) -0.06 -0.40 0.04 -0.70 0.14 Departure Headway (s) 7.2 6.0 6.9 6.1 6.0 Degree Utilization, x 0.13 0.60 0.34 0.10 0.91 Capacity (veh/h) 455 575 497 551 592 Control Delay (s) 11.2 17.6 12.2 8.6 43.1 Approach Delay (s) 11.2 17.6 11.3 43.1 Approach LOS B C B E Intersection Summary Delay 27.6 HCM Level of Service D Intersection Capacity Utilization 72.8% ICU Level of Service C Analysis Period (min) 15 HCM Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 9: NE 12th St & Harrington AV NE 10/16/2010 No Action PM (2015)Synchro 7 - Report Sunset Area Planned EIS Page 9 Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations Sign Control Stop Stop Stop Stop Volume (vph) 34 306 10 17 296 69 17 17 14 48 17 3 Peak Hour Factor 0.63 0.74 0.38 0.63 0.80 1.00 0.63 0.42 0.33 0.39 0.42 0.25 Hourly flow rate (vph) 54 414 26 27 370 69 27 40 42 123 40 12 Direction, Lane # EB 1 WB 1 NB 1 SB 1 Volume Total (vph) 494 466 110 176 Volume Left (vph) 54 27 27 123 Volume Right (vph) 26 69 42 12 Hadj (s) 0.02 -0.04 -0.15 0.13 Departure Headway (s) 5.8 5.8 7.1 7.1 Degree Utilization, x 0.80 0.75 0.22 0.34 Capacity (veh/h) 603 598 439 454 Control Delay (s) 27.7 24.1 12.0 13.7 Approach Delay (s) 27.7 24.1 12.0 13.7 Approach LOS D C B B Intersection Summary Delay 23.0 HCM Level of Service C Intersection Capacity Utilization 43.2% ICU Level of Service A Analysis Period (min) 15 HCM Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 10: NE 12th St & Kirkland Ave NE 10/16/2010 No Action PM (2015)Synchro 7 - Report Sunset Area Planned EIS Page 10 Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations Sign Control Stop Stop Stop Stop Volume (vph) 17 310 14 7 227 34 24 45 3 69 34 14 Peak Hour Factor 0.42 0.87 0.33 0.50 0.87 0.50 0.58 0.65 0.25 0.71 0.42 0.50 Hourly flow rate (vph) 40 356 42 14 261 68 41 69 12 97 81 28 Direction, Lane # EB 1 EB 2 WB 1 WB 2 NB 1 SB 1 Volume Total (vph) 219 221 144 198 123 206 Volume Left (vph) 40 0 14 0 41 97 Volume Right (vph) 0 42 0 68 12 28 Hadj (s) 0.13 -0.10 0.08 -0.21 0.04 0.05 Departure Headway (s) 6.2 6.0 6.3 6.0 6.3 6.1 Degree Utilization, x 0.38 0.37 0.25 0.33 0.22 0.35 Capacity (veh/h) 552 576 539 567 504 542 Control Delay (s) 11.7 11.2 10.2 10.7 11.0 12.4 Approach Delay (s) 11.5 10.5 11.0 12.4 Approach LOS B B B B Intersection Summary Delay 11.3 HCM Level of Service B Intersection Capacity Utilization 38.3% ICU Level of Service A Analysis Period (min) 15 HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 1: NE Sunset Blvd./NE Park & NE Sunset Blvd.10/16/2010 No Action PM (2030)Synchro 7 - Report Sunset Area Planned EIS Page 1 Movement EBT EBR WBL WBT NBL NBR Lane Configurations Volume (vph) 1555 88 175 1041 60 233 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Total Lost time (s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 Lane Util. Factor 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 Frt 0.99 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.85 Flt Protected 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 Satd. Flow (prot) 3506 1770 3539 1770 1583 Flt Permitted 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 Satd. Flow (perm) 3506 1770 3539 1770 1583 Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.99 0.83 0.81 0.95 0.78 0.85 Adj. Flow (vph) 1571 106 216 1096 77 274 RTOR Reduction (vph)50000241 Lane Group Flow (vph) 1672 0 216 1096 77 33 Turn Type Prot Prot Protected Phases 2 1644 Permitted Phases Actuated Green, G (s) 44.3 14.0 62.3 8.7 8.7 Effective Green, g (s) 46.3 15.0 64.3 9.7 9.7 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.58 0.19 0.80 0.12 0.12 Clearance Time (s) 5.0 4.0 5.0 4.0 4.0 Vehicle Extension (s) 5.0 3.0 5.0 3.0 3.0 Lane Grp Cap (vph) 2029 332 2844 215 192 v/s Ratio Prot c0.48 c0.12 0.31 c0.04 0.02 v/s Ratio Perm v/c Ratio 0.82 0.65 0.39 0.36 0.17 Uniform Delay, d1 13.6 30.1 2.2 32.3 31.5 Progression Factor 0.37 0.67 0.06 1.00 1.00 Incremental Delay, d2 3.4 3.9 0.3 1.0 0.4 Delay (s) 8.5 24.0 0.5 33.3 32.0 Level of Service A C A C C Approach Delay (s) 8.5 4.4 32.3 Approach LOS A A C Intersection Summary HCM Average Control Delay 9.4 HCM Level of Service A HCM Volume to Capacity ratio 0.72 Actuated Cycle Length (s) 80.0 Sum of lost time (s) 9.0 Intersection Capacity Utilization 69.6% ICU Level of Service C Analysis Period (min) 15 c Critical Lane Group HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 2: NE Sunset Blvd & Edmonds AV NE 10/16/2010 No Action PM (2030)Synchro 7 - Report Sunset Area Planned EIS Page 2 Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations Volume (vph) 147 1421 96 46 957 8 56 28 31 6 44 125 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Lane Width 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 11 12 12 11 12 Total Lost time (s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 Lane Util. Factor 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Frt 1.00 0.99 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.93 1.00 0.90 Flt Protected 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 Satd. Flow (prot) 1770 3495 1770 3532 1770 1681 1770 1614 Flt Permitted 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.32 1.00 0.65 1.00 Satd. Flow (perm) 1770 3495 1770 3532 596 1681 1206 1614 Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.85 0.95 0.71 0.86 0.89 0.58 0.84 0.52 0.72 0.63 0.66 0.84 Adj. Flow (vph) 173 1496 135 53 1075 14 67 54 43 10 67 149 RTOR Reduction (vph)050010036001260 Lane Group Flow (vph) 173 1626 0 53 1088 0 67 61 0 10 90 0 Turn Type Prot Prot Perm Perm Protected Phases 1 6 5 2 4 4 Permitted Phases 4 4 Actuated Green, G (s) 15.6 50.0 5.5 39.9 11.5 11.5 11.5 11.5 Effective Green, g (s) 16.6 52.0 6.5 41.9 12.5 12.5 12.5 12.5 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.21 0.65 0.08 0.52 0.16 0.16 0.16 0.16 Clearance Time (s) 4.0 5.0 4.0 5.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 Vehicle Extension (s) 4.0 6.0 4.0 6.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 Lane Grp Cap (vph) 367 2272 144 1850 93 263 188 252 v/s Ratio Prot 0.10 c0.47 0.03 c0.31 0.04 0.06 v/s Ratio Perm c0.11 0.01 v/c Ratio 0.47 0.72 0.37 0.59 0.72 0.23 0.05 0.36 Uniform Delay, d1 27.8 9.2 34.8 13.1 32.1 29.5 28.7 30.2 Progression Factor 0.89 0.70 1.13 0.54 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Incremental Delay, d2 0.8 1.2 2.0 1.3 25.3 0.6 0.2 1.2 Delay (s) 25.7 7.7 41.1 8.3 57.3 30.2 28.9 31.4 Level of Service C A D A E C C C Approach Delay (s) 9.4 9.8 41.3 31.2 Approach LOS A A D C Intersection Summary HCM Average Control Delay 12.6 HCM Level of Service B HCM Volume to Capacity ratio 0.71 Actuated Cycle Length (s) 80.0 Sum of lost time (s) 9.0 Intersection Capacity Utilization 72.3% ICU Level of Service C Analysis Period (min) 15 c Critical Lane Group HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 3: NE Sunset Blvd & Harrington AV NE 10/16/2010 No Action PM (2030)Synchro 7 - Report Sunset Area Planned EIS Page 3 Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations Volume (vph) 25 1361 52 78 1091 4 43 10 79 10 19 23 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Total Lost time (s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 Lane Util. Factor 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 Frt 1.00 0.99 1.00 1.00 0.92 0.94 Flt Protected 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.99 0.99 Satd. Flow (prot) 1770 3515 1770 3534 1687 1735 Flt Permitted 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.90 0.91 Satd. Flow (perm) 1770 3515 1770 3534 1538 1594 Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.75 0.90 0.72 0.86 0.92 0.38 0.90 0.50 0.75 0.67 0.57 0.59 Adj. Flow (vph) 33 1512 72 91 1186 11 48 20 105 15 33 39 RTOR Reduction (vph)03001008700330 Lane Group Flow (vph) 33 1581 0 91 1196 0 0 86 0 0 54 0 Turn Type Prot Prot Perm Perm Protected Phases 1 6 5 2 4 4 Permitted Phases 4 4 Actuated Green, G (s) 2.4 49.5 7.2 54.3 10.3 10.3 Effective Green, g (s) 3.4 51.5 8.2 56.3 11.3 11.3 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.04 0.64 0.10 0.70 0.14 0.14 Clearance Time (s) 4.0 5.0 4.0 5.0 4.0 4.0 Vehicle Extension (s) 4.0 6.0 4.0 6.0 4.0 4.0 Lane Grp Cap (vph) 75 2263 181 2487 217 225 v/s Ratio Prot 0.02 c0.45 c0.05 c0.34 v/s Ratio Perm c0.06 0.03 v/c Ratio 0.44 0.70 0.50 0.48 0.40 0.24 Uniform Delay, d1 37.4 9.2 34.0 5.3 31.3 30.5 Progression Factor 0.70 0.29 0.63 0.67 1.00 1.00 Incremental Delay, d2 4.2 1.4 2.4 0.5 1.6 0.7 Delay (s) 30.5 4.0 23.9 4.1 32.9 31.3 Level of Service C A C A C C Approach Delay (s) 4.6 5.5 32.9 31.3 Approach LOS A A C C Intersection Summary HCM Average Control Delay 7.2 HCM Level of Service A HCM Volume to Capacity ratio 0.61 Actuated Cycle Length (s) 80.0 Sum of lost time (s) 6.0 Intersection Capacity Utilization 66.6% ICU Level of Service C Analysis Period (min) 15 c Critical Lane Group HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 4: NE 10th St & NE Sunset Blvd 10/16/2010 No Action PM (2030)Synchro 7 - Report Sunset Area Planned EIS Page 4 Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations Volume (vph) 16 53 28 123 41 40 46 1182 162 72 1053 8 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Total Lost time (s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 Lane Util. Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 Frt 0.97 0.97 1.00 0.98 1.00 1.00 Flt Protected 0.99 0.97 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 Satd. Flow (prot) 1778 1756 1770 3462 1770 3535 Flt Permitted 0.92 0.74 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 Satd. Flow (perm) 1646 1331 1770 3462 1770 3535 Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.65 0.92 0.96 0.67 0.77 0.63 0.68 0.96 0.77 0.83 0.94 0.88 Adj. Flow (vph) 25 58 29 184 53 63 68 1231 210 87 1120 9 RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 17 0 0 12 0 0 15 0000 Lane Group Flow (vph) 0 95 0 0 288 0 68 1426 0 87 1129 0 Turn Type Perm Perm Prot Prot Protected Phases 4 4 1 6 5 2 Permitted Phases 4 4 4 Actuated Green, G (s) 21.3 21.3 4.9 38.4 7.3 40.8 Effective Green, g (s) 22.3 22.3 5.9 40.4 8.3 42.8 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.28 0.28 0.07 0.50 0.10 0.53 Clearance Time (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 5.0 4.0 5.0 Vehicle Extension (s) 5.0 5.0 4.0 5.0 4.0 5.0 Lane Grp Cap (vph) 459 371 131 1748 184 1891 v/s Ratio Prot 0.04 c0.41 0.05 c0.32 v/s Ratio Perm 0.06 c0.22 v/c Ratio 0.21 0.78 0.52 0.82 0.47 0.60 Uniform Delay, d1 22.1 26.5 35.7 16.7 33.8 12.7 Progression Factor 0.98 1.00 0.60 0.33 1.31 0.79 Incremental Delay, d2 0.5 11.3 3.5 3.4 2.3 1.2 Delay (s) 22.1 37.9 25.1 8.9 46.6 11.3 Level of Service C D C A D B Approach Delay (s) 22.1 37.9 9.6 13.8 Approach LOS C D A B Intersection Summary HCM Average Control Delay 14.4 HCM Level of Service B HCM Volume to Capacity ratio 0.78 Actuated Cycle Length (s) 80.0 Sum of lost time (s) 9.0 Intersection Capacity Utilization 69.9% ICU Level of Service C Analysis Period (min) 15 c Critical Lane Group HCM Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 5: NE Sunset Blvd & Kirkland Ave NE 10/16/2010 No Action PM (2030)Synchro 7 - Report Sunset Area Planned EIS Page 5 Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations Volume (veh/h) 68 1171 7 22 889 4 11 4 29 0 4 90 Sign Control Free Free Stop Stop Grade 0% 0% 0% 0% Peak Hour Factor 0.79 0.90 0.50 0.50 0.90 0.25 0.75 0.25 0.33 0.90 0.25 0.63 Hourly flow rate (vph) 86 1301 14 44 988 16 15 16 88 0 16 143 Pedestrians Lane Width (ft) Walking Speed (ft/s) Percent Blockage Right turn flare (veh) Median type None None Median storage veh) Upstream signal (ft) 1086 344 pX, platoon unblocked 0.77 0.72 0.84 0.84 0.72 0.84 0.84 0.77 vC, conflicting volume 1004 1315 2213 2572 658 2002 2571 502 vC1, stage 1 conf vol vC2, stage 2 conf vol vCu, unblocked vol 415 668 834 1263 0 582 1262 0 tC, single (s) 4.1 4.1 7.5 6.5 6.9 7.5 6.5 6.9 tC, 2 stage (s) tF (s) 2.2 2.2 3.5 4.0 3.3 3.5 4.0 3.3 p0 queue free % 90 93 90 87 89 100 87 83 cM capacity (veh/h) 881 663 143 119 783 233 119 837 Direction, Lane # EB 1 EB 2 EB 3 WB 1 WB 2 WB 3 NB 1 SB 1 Volume Total 86 867 448 44 659 345 119 159 Volume Left 86 0 0 44 0 0 15 0 Volume Right 0 0 14 0 0 16 88 143 cSH 881 1700 1700 663 1700 1700 339 520 Volume to Capacity 0.10 0.51 0.26 0.07 0.39 0.20 0.35 0.31 Queue Length 95th (ft)8005003832 Control Delay (s) 9.5 0.0 0.0 10.8 0.0 0.0 21.2 14.9 Lane LOS A B C B Approach Delay (s) 0.6 0.5 21.2 14.9 Approach LOS C B Intersection Summary Average Delay 2.3 Intersection Capacity Utilization 55.2% ICU Level of Service B Analysis Period (min) 15 HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 6: NE 12th St & NE Sunset Blvd 10/16/2010 No Action PM (2030)Synchro 7 - Report Sunset Area Planned EIS Page 6 Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations Volume (vph) 195 165 12 92 89 52 30 1050 120 80 809 150 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Lane Width 12 11 12 12 11 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 Total Lost time (s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 Lane Util. Factor 0.95 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 Frt 0.99 0.96 1.00 0.98 1.00 0.97 Flt Protected 0.98 0.98 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 Satd. Flow (prot) 3317 3221 1770 3480 1770 3449 Flt Permitted 0.98 0.98 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 Satd. Flow (perm) 3317 3221 1770 3480 1770 3449 Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.92 0.82 0.63 0.77 0.84 0.63 0.78 0.94 0.86 0.76 0.91 0.82 Adj. Flow (vph) 212 201 19 119 106 83 38 1117 140 105 889 183 RTOR Reduction (vph)040051001100190 Lane Group Flow (vph) 0 428 0 0 257 0 38 1246 0 105 1053 0 Turn Type Split Split Prot Prot Protected Phases 4 4 3 3 1 6 5 2 Permitted Phases Actuated Green, G (s) 15.3 11.4 4.2 30.7 5.6 32.1 Effective Green, g (s) 16.3 12.4 5.2 32.7 6.6 34.1 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.20 0.16 0.07 0.41 0.08 0.43 Clearance Time (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 5.0 4.0 5.0 Vehicle Extension (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 Lane Grp Cap (vph) 676 499 115 1422 146 1470 v/s Ratio Prot c0.13 c0.08 0.02 c0.36 0.06 c0.31 v/s Ratio Perm v/c Ratio 0.63 0.52 0.33 0.88 0.72 0.72 Uniform Delay, d1 29.1 31.0 35.7 21.8 35.8 19.0 Progression Factor 1.00 1.00 1.18 0.42 1.00 1.00 Incremental Delay, d2 2.2 1.2 1.6 5.8 16.6 3.0 Delay (s) 31.3 32.2 43.9 15.0 52.4 22.0 Level of Service C C D B D C Approach Delay (s) 31.3 32.2 15.9 24.7 Approach LOS C C B C Intersection Summary HCM Average Control Delay 22.8 HCM Level of Service C HCM Volume to Capacity ratio 0.73 Actuated Cycle Length (s) 80.0 Sum of lost time (s) 9.0 Intersection Capacity Utilization 68.2% ICU Level of Service C Analysis Period (min) 15 c Critical Lane Group HCM Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 7: NE Sunset Blvd & Monroe Ave NE 10/16/2010 No Action PM (2030)Synchro 7 - Report Sunset Area Planned EIS Page 7 Movement EBT EBR WBL WBT NBL NBR Lane Configurations Volume (veh/h) 1281 14 4 1040 0 18 Sign Control Free Free Stop Grade 0% 0% 0% Peak Hour Factor 0.90 0.50 0.25 0.90 0.90 0.63 Hourly flow rate (vph) 1423 28 16 1156 0 29 Pedestrians Lane Width (ft) Walking Speed (ft/s) Percent Blockage Right turn flare (veh) 2 Median type None None Median storage veh) Upstream signal (ft) 1166 pX, platoon unblocked 0.71 0.71 0.71 vC, conflicting volume 1451 2047 726 vC1, stage 1 conf vol vC2, stage 2 conf vol vCu, unblocked vol 815 1655 0 tC, single (s) 4.1 6.8 6.9 tC, 2 stage (s) tF (s) 2.2 3.5 3.3 p0 queue free % 97 100 96 cM capacity (veh/h) 573 61 768 Direction, Lane # EB 1 EB 2 WB 1 WB 2 WB 3 NB 1 Volume Total 949 502 16 578 578 29 Volume Left 0 0 16 0 0 0 Volume Right 0 28 0 0 0 29 cSH 1700 1700 573 1700 1700 384 Volume to Capacity 0.56 0.30 0.03 0.34 0.34 0.07 Queue Length 95th (ft)002006 Control Delay (s) 0.0 0.0 11.5 0.0 0.0 15.1 Lane LOS B C Approach Delay (s) 0.0 0.2 15.1 Approach LOS C Intersection Summary Average Delay 0.2 Intersection Capacity Utilization 45.9% ICU Level of Service A Analysis Period (min) 15 HCM Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 8: NE 12th St & Edmonds AV NE 10/16/2010 No Action PM (2030)Synchro 7 - Report Sunset Area Planned EIS Page 8 Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations Sign Control Stop Stop Stop Stop Volume (vph) 4 47 6 46 55 250 14 160 59 390 124 8 Peak Hour Factor 0.82 0.82 0.82 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.91 0.91 0.91 Hourly flow rate (vph) 5 57 7 49 59 269 15 170 63 429 136 9 Direction, Lane # EB 1 WB 1 NB 1 NB 2 SB 1 Volume Total (vph) 70 377 185 63 574 Volume Left (vph) 5 49 15 0 429 Volume Right (vph) 7 269 0 63 9 Hadj (s) -0.05 -0.40 0.04 -0.70 0.14 Departure Headway (s) 7.5 6.2 7.1 6.4 6.2 Degree Utilization, x 0.14 0.65 0.37 0.11 0.98 Capacity (veh/h) 438 571 490 542 573 Control Delay (s) 11.7 19.7 13.0 8.9 57.3 Approach Delay (s) 11.7 19.7 11.9 57.3 Approach LOS B C B F Intersection Summary Delay 34.8 HCM Level of Service D Intersection Capacity Utilization 75.3% ICU Level of Service D Analysis Period (min) 15 HCM Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 9: NE 12th St & Harrington AV NE 10/16/2010 No Action PM (2030)Synchro 7 - Report Sunset Area Planned EIS Page 9 Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations Sign Control Stop Stop Stop Stop Volume (vph) 36 321 11 18 310 72 18 18 14 50 18 4 Peak Hour Factor 0.63 0.74 0.38 0.63 0.80 1.00 0.63 0.42 0.33 0.39 0.42 0.25 Hourly flow rate (vph) 57 434 29 29 388 72 29 43 42 128 43 16 Direction, Lane # EB 1 WB 1 NB 1 SB 1 Volume Total (vph) 520 488 114 187 Volume Left (vph) 57 29 29 128 Volume Right (vph) 29 72 42 16 Hadj (s) 0.02 -0.04 -0.14 0.12 Departure Headway (s) 6.0 6.0 7.4 7.3 Degree Utilization, x 0.87 0.81 0.23 0.38 Capacity (veh/h) 587 581 432 452 Control Delay (s) 35.7 29.8 12.6 14.7 Approach Delay (s) 35.7 29.8 12.6 14.7 Approach LOS E D B B Intersection Summary Delay 28.5 HCM Level of Service D Intersection Capacity Utilization 45.0% ICU Level of Service A Analysis Period (min) 15 HCM Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 10: NE 12th St & Kirkland Ave NE 10/16/2010 No Action PM (2030)Synchro 7 - Report Sunset Area Planned EIS Page 10 Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations Sign Control Stop Stop Stop Stop Volume (vph) 18 324 14 7 238 36 25 47 4 72 36 14 Peak Hour Factor 0.42 0.87 0.33 0.50 0.87 0.50 0.58 0.65 0.25 0.71 0.42 0.50 Hourly flow rate (vph) 43 372 42 14 274 72 43 72 16 101 86 28 Direction, Lane # EB 1 EB 2 WB 1 WB 2 NB 1 SB 1 Volume Total (vph) 229 229 151 209 131 215 Volume Left (vph) 43 0 14 0 43 101 Volume Right (vph) 0 42 0 72 16 28 Hadj (s) 0.13 -0.10 0.08 -0.21 0.03 0.05 Departure Headway (s) 6.3 6.1 6.4 6.1 6.4 6.2 Degree Utilization, x 0.40 0.39 0.27 0.36 0.24 0.37 Capacity (veh/h) 541 564 529 555 494 530 Control Delay (s) 12.3 11.7 10.6 11.3 11.4 12.9 Approach Delay (s) 12.0 11.0 11.4 12.9 Approach LOS B B B B Intersection Summary Delay 11.8 HCM Level of Service B Intersection Capacity Utilization 39.6% ICU Level of Service A Analysis Period (min) 15 HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 1: NE Sunset Blvd./NE Park & NE Sunset Blvd.10/16/2010 Alternative 2 PM (2015)Synchro 7 - Report Sunset Area Planned EIS Page 1 Movement EBT EBR WBL WBT NBL NBR Lane Configurations Volume (vph) 1522 86 172 1019 59 228 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Total Lost time (s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 Lane Util. Factor 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 Frt 0.99 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.85 Flt Protected 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 Satd. Flow (prot) 3506 1770 3539 1770 1583 Flt Permitted 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 Satd. Flow (perm) 3506 1770 3539 1770 1583 Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.99 0.83 0.81 0.95 0.78 0.85 Adj. Flow (vph) 1537 104 212 1073 76 268 RTOR Reduction (vph)50000236 Lane Group Flow (vph) 1636 0 212 1073 76 32 Turn Type Prot Prot Protected Phases 2 1644 Permitted Phases Actuated Green, G (s) 44.3 14.0 62.3 8.7 8.7 Effective Green, g (s) 46.3 15.0 64.3 9.7 9.7 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.58 0.19 0.80 0.12 0.12 Clearance Time (s) 5.0 4.0 5.0 4.0 4.0 Vehicle Extension (s) 5.0 3.0 5.0 3.0 3.0 Lane Grp Cap (vph) 2029 332 2844 215 192 v/s Ratio Prot c0.47 c0.12 0.30 c0.04 0.02 v/s Ratio Perm v/c Ratio 0.81 0.64 0.38 0.35 0.17 Uniform Delay, d1 13.3 30.0 2.2 32.3 31.5 Progression Factor 0.37 0.68 0.06 1.00 1.00 Incremental Delay, d2 3.0 3.5 0.3 1.0 0.4 Delay (s) 8.0 23.8 0.5 33.3 32.0 Level of Service A C A C C Approach Delay (s) 8.0 4.3 32.2 Approach LOS A A C Intersection Summary HCM Average Control Delay 9.1 HCM Level of Service A HCM Volume to Capacity ratio 0.71 Actuated Cycle Length (s) 80.0 Sum of lost time (s) 9.0 Intersection Capacity Utilization 68.5% ICU Level of Service C Analysis Period (min) 15 c Critical Lane Group HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 2: NE Sunset Blvd & Edmonds AV NE 10/16/2010 Alternative 2 PM (2015)Synchro 7 - Report Sunset Area Planned EIS Page 2 Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations Volume (vph) 143 1390 94 45 936 8 55 27 31 6 43 122 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Lane Width 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 11 12 12 11 12 Total Lost time (s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 Lane Util. Factor 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Frt 1.00 0.99 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.93 1.00 0.90 Flt Protected 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 Satd. Flow (prot) 1770 3495 1770 3532 1770 1678 1770 1614 Flt Permitted 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.33 1.00 0.65 1.00 Satd. Flow (perm) 1770 3495 1770 3532 606 1678 1214 1614 Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.85 0.95 0.71 0.86 0.89 0.58 0.84 0.52 0.72 0.63 0.66 0.84 Adj. Flow (vph) 168 1463 132 52 1052 14 65 52 43 10 65 145 RTOR Reduction (vph)050010036001230 Lane Group Flow (vph) 168 1590 0 52 1065 0 65 59 0 10 87 0 Turn Type Prot Prot Perm Perm Protected Phases 1 6 5 2 4 4 Permitted Phases 4 4 Actuated Green, G (s) 15.5 50.3 5.4 40.2 11.3 11.3 11.3 11.3 Effective Green, g (s) 16.5 52.3 6.4 42.2 12.3 12.3 12.3 12.3 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.21 0.65 0.08 0.53 0.15 0.15 0.15 0.15 Clearance Time (s) 4.0 5.0 4.0 5.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 Vehicle Extension (s) 4.0 6.0 4.0 6.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 Lane Grp Cap (vph) 365 2285 142 1863 93 258 187 248 v/s Ratio Prot 0.09 c0.45 0.03 c0.30 0.03 0.05 v/s Ratio Perm c0.11 0.01 v/c Ratio 0.46 0.70 0.37 0.57 0.70 0.23 0.05 0.35 Uniform Delay, d1 27.8 8.8 34.9 12.8 32.1 29.7 28.9 30.3 Progression Factor 0.89 0.69 1.11 0.55 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Incremental Delay, d2 0.8 1.1 2.0 1.2 21.9 0.6 0.2 1.2 Delay (s) 25.6 7.2 40.8 8.2 54.0 30.3 29.0 31.5 Level of Service C A D A D C C C Approach Delay (s) 9.0 9.7 39.9 31.4 Approach LOS A A D C Intersection Summary HCM Average Control Delay 12.3 HCM Level of Service B HCM Volume to Capacity ratio 0.69 Actuated Cycle Length (s) 80.0 Sum of lost time (s) 9.0 Intersection Capacity Utilization 71.2% ICU Level of Service C Analysis Period (min) 15 c Critical Lane Group HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 3: NE Sunset Blvd & Harrington AV NE 10/16/2010 Alternative 2 PM (2015)Synchro 7 - Report Sunset Area Planned EIS Page 3 Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations Volume (vph) 25 1331 51 76 1067 4 42 9 78 9 19 22 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Total Lost time (s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 Lane Util. Factor 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 Frt 1.00 0.99 1.00 1.00 0.92 0.94 Flt Protected 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.99 0.99 Satd. Flow (prot) 1770 3515 1770 3534 1685 1737 Flt Permitted 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.90 0.92 Satd. Flow (perm) 1770 3515 1770 3534 1541 1615 Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.75 0.90 0.72 0.86 0.92 0.38 0.90 0.50 0.75 0.67 0.57 0.59 Adj. Flow (vph) 33 1479 71 88 1160 11 47 18 104 13 33 37 RTOR Reduction (vph)03001009000320 Lane Group Flow (vph) 33 1547 0 88 1170 0 0 79 0 0 51 0 Turn Type Prot Prot Perm Perm Protected Phases 1 6 5 2 4 4 Permitted Phases 4 4 Actuated Green, G (s) 2.4 49.8 7.2 54.6 10.0 10.0 Effective Green, g (s) 3.4 51.8 8.2 56.6 11.0 11.0 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.04 0.65 0.10 0.71 0.14 0.14 Clearance Time (s) 4.0 5.0 4.0 5.0 4.0 4.0 Vehicle Extension (s) 4.0 6.0 4.0 6.0 4.0 4.0 Lane Grp Cap (vph) 75 2276 181 2500 212 222 v/s Ratio Prot 0.02 c0.44 c0.05 c0.33 v/s Ratio Perm c0.05 0.03 v/c Ratio 0.44 0.68 0.49 0.47 0.37 0.23 Uniform Delay, d1 37.4 8.9 33.9 5.1 31.4 30.7 Progression Factor 0.72 0.26 0.64 0.69 1.00 1.00 Incremental Delay, d2 4.3 1.3 2.3 0.5 1.5 0.7 Delay (s) 31.1 3.6 23.8 4.1 32.9 31.5 Level of Service C A C A C C Approach Delay (s) 4.1 5.5 32.9 31.5 Approach LOS A A C C Intersection Summary HCM Average Control Delay 7.0 HCM Level of Service A HCM Volume to Capacity ratio 0.60 Actuated Cycle Length (s) 80.0 Sum of lost time (s) 6.0 Intersection Capacity Utilization 65.8% ICU Level of Service C Analysis Period (min) 15 c Critical Lane Group HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 4: NE 10th St & NE Sunset Blvd 10/16/2010 Alternative 2 PM (2015)Synchro 7 - Report Sunset Area Planned EIS Page 4 Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations Volume (vph) 15 52 27 131 40 39 45 1156 159 81 1019 8 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Total Lost time (s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 Lane Util. Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 Frt 0.96 0.97 1.00 0.98 1.00 1.00 Flt Protected 0.99 0.97 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 Satd. Flow (prot) 1779 1757 1770 3462 1770 3535 Flt Permitted 0.92 0.74 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 Satd. Flow (perm) 1654 1334 1770 3462 1770 3535 Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.65 0.92 0.96 0.67 0.77 0.63 0.68 0.96 0.77 0.83 0.94 0.88 Adj. Flow (vph) 23 57 28 196 52 62 66 1204 206 98 1084 9 RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 16 0 0 11 0 0 15 0000 Lane Group Flow (vph) 0 92 0 0 299 0 66 1395 0 98 1093 0 Turn Type Perm Perm Prot Prot Protected Phases 4 4 1 6 5 2 Permitted Phases 4 4 4 Actuated Green, G (s) 21.7 21.7 4.8 38.1 7.2 40.5 Effective Green, g (s) 22.7 22.7 5.8 40.1 8.2 42.5 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.28 0.28 0.07 0.50 0.10 0.53 Clearance Time (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 5.0 4.0 5.0 Vehicle Extension (s) 5.0 5.0 4.0 5.0 4.0 5.0 Lane Grp Cap (vph) 469 379 128 1735 181 1878 v/s Ratio Prot 0.04 c0.40 0.06 c0.31 v/s Ratio Perm 0.06 c0.22 v/c Ratio 0.20 0.79 0.52 0.80 0.54 0.58 Uniform Delay, d1 21.7 26.4 35.7 16.7 34.1 12.7 Progression Factor 0.97 1.00 0.61 0.33 1.31 0.78 Incremental Delay, d2 0.4 11.9 3.6 3.2 3.6 1.1 Delay (s) 21.6 38.3 25.3 8.8 48.3 11.0 Level of Service C D C A D B Approach Delay (s) 21.6 38.3 9.5 14.1 Approach LOS C D A B Intersection Summary HCM Average Control Delay 14.6 HCM Level of Service B HCM Volume to Capacity ratio 0.78 Actuated Cycle Length (s) 80.0 Sum of lost time (s) 9.0 Intersection Capacity Utilization 69.9% ICU Level of Service C Analysis Period (min) 15 c Critical Lane Group HCM Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 5: NE Sunset Blvd & Kirkland Ave NE 10/16/2010 Alternative 2 PM (2015)Synchro 7 - Report Sunset Area Planned EIS Page 5 Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations Volume (veh/h) 67 1146 7 0 880 4 0 0 32 0 0 88 Sign Control Free Free Stop Stop Grade 0% 0% 0% 0% Peak Hour Factor 0.79 0.90 0.50 0.50 0.90 0.25 0.75 0.25 0.33 0.90 0.25 0.63 Hourly flow rate (vph) 85 1273 14 0 978 16 0 0 97 0 0 140 Pedestrians Lane Width (ft) Walking Speed (ft/s) Percent Blockage Right turn flare (veh) Median type None None Median storage veh) Upstream signal (ft) 1086 344 pX, platoon unblocked 0.78 0.74 0.85 0.85 0.74 0.85 0.85 0.78 vC, conflicting volume 994 1287 2079 2444 644 1889 2443 497 vC1, stage 1 conf vol vC2, stage 2 conf vol vCu, unblocked vol 424 671 734 1166 0 510 1165 0 tC, single (s) 4.1 4.1 7.5 6.5 6.9 7.5 6.5 6.9 tC, 2 stage (s) tF (s) 2.2 2.2 3.5 4.0 3.3 3.5 4.0 3.3 p0 queue free % 90 100 100 100 88 100 100 83 cM capacity (veh/h) 881 673 201 147 798 307 148 844 Direction, Lane # EB 1 EB 2 EB 3 WB 1 WB 2 NB 1 SB 1 Volume Total 85 849 438 652 342 97 140 Volume Left 85 000000 Volume Right 0 0 14 0 16 97 140 cSH 881 1700 1700 1700 1700 798 844 Volume to Capacity 0.10 0.50 0.26 0.38 0.20 0.12 0.17 Queue Length 95th (ft)800001015 Control Delay (s) 9.5 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 10.1 10.1 Lane LOS A B B Approach Delay (s) 0.6 0.0 10.1 10.1 Approach LOS B B Intersection Summary Average Delay 1.2 Intersection Capacity Utilization 41.9% ICU Level of Service A Analysis Period (min) 15 HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 6: NE 12th St & NE Sunset Blvd 10/16/2010 Alternative 2 PM (2015)Synchro 7 - Report Sunset Area Planned EIS Page 6 Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations Volume (vph) 190 165 12 90 87 51 33 1027 118 90 781 147 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Lane Width 12 11 12 12 11 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 Total Lost time (s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 Lane Util. Factor 0.95 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 Frt 0.99 0.96 1.00 0.98 1.00 0.97 Flt Protected 0.98 0.98 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 Satd. Flow (prot) 3318 3221 1770 3480 1770 3448 Flt Permitted 0.98 0.98 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 Satd. Flow (perm) 3318 3221 1770 3480 1770 3448 Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.92 0.82 0.63 0.77 0.84 0.63 0.78 0.94 0.86 0.76 0.91 0.82 Adj. Flow (vph) 207 201 19 117 104 81 42 1093 137 118 858 179 RTOR Reduction (vph)040050001100190 Lane Group Flow (vph) 0 423 0 0 252 0 42 1219 0 118 1018 0 Turn Type Split Split Prot Prot Protected Phases 4 4 3 3 1 6 5 2 Permitted Phases Actuated Green, G (s) 15.2 11.3 4.3 28.9 7.6 32.2 Effective Green, g (s) 16.2 12.3 5.3 30.9 8.6 34.2 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.20 0.15 0.07 0.39 0.11 0.43 Clearance Time (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 5.0 4.0 5.0 Vehicle Extension (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 Lane Grp Cap (vph) 672 495 117 1344 190 1474 v/s Ratio Prot c0.13 c0.08 0.02 c0.35 0.07 c0.30 v/s Ratio Perm v/c Ratio 0.63 0.51 0.36 0.91 0.62 0.69 Uniform Delay, d1 29.2 31.1 35.7 23.2 34.1 18.6 Progression Factor 1.00 1.00 1.19 0.41 1.00 1.00 Incremental Delay, d2 2.1 1.1 1.9 8.0 7.0 2.7 Delay (s) 31.3 32.2 44.2 17.6 41.1 21.3 Level of Service C C D B D C Approach Delay (s) 31.3 32.2 18.4 23.3 Approach LOS C C B C Intersection Summary HCM Average Control Delay 23.3 HCM Level of Service C HCM Volume to Capacity ratio 0.73 Actuated Cycle Length (s) 80.0 Sum of lost time (s) 9.0 Intersection Capacity Utilization 67.6% ICU Level of Service C Analysis Period (min) 15 c Critical Lane Group HCM Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 7: NE Sunset Blvd & Monroe Ave NE 10/16/2010 Alternative 2 PM (2015)Synchro 7 - Report Sunset Area Planned EIS Page 7 Movement EBT EBR WBL WBT NBL NBR Lane Configurations Volume (veh/h) 1254 14 4 1018 0 18 Sign Control Free Free Stop Grade 0% 0% 0% Peak Hour Factor 0.90 0.50 0.25 0.90 0.90 0.63 Hourly flow rate (vph) 1393 28 16 1131 0 29 Pedestrians Lane Width (ft) Walking Speed (ft/s) Percent Blockage Right turn flare (veh) 2 Median type None None Median storage veh) Upstream signal (ft) 1166 pX, platoon unblocked 0.72 0.72 0.72 vC, conflicting volume 1421 2005 711 vC1, stage 1 conf vol vC2, stage 2 conf vol vCu, unblocked vol 808 1618 0 tC, single (s) 4.1 6.8 6.9 tC, 2 stage (s) tF (s) 2.2 3.5 3.3 p0 queue free % 97 100 96 cM capacity (veh/h) 586 66 781 Direction, Lane # EB 1 EB 2 WB 1 WB 2 WB 3 NB 1 Volume Total 929 492 16 566 566 29 Volume Left 0 0 16 0 0 0 Volume Right 0 28 0 0 0 29 cSH 1700 1700 586 1700 1700 390 Volume to Capacity 0.55 0.29 0.03 0.33 0.33 0.07 Queue Length 95th (ft)002006 Control Delay (s) 0.0 0.0 11.3 0.0 0.0 14.9 Lane LOS B B Approach Delay (s) 0.0 0.2 14.9 Approach LOS B Intersection Summary Average Delay 0.2 Intersection Capacity Utilization 45.1% ICU Level of Service A Analysis Period (min) 15 HCM Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 8: NE 12th St & Edmonds AV NE 10/16/2010 Alternative 2 PM (2015)Synchro 7 - Report Sunset Area Planned EIS Page 8 Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations Sign Control Stop Stop Stop Stop Volume (vph) 4 46 6 45 54 244 14 156 58 382 121 8 Peak Hour Factor 0.82 0.82 0.82 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.91 0.91 0.91 Hourly flow rate (vph) 5 56 7 48 58 262 15 166 62 420 133 9 Direction, Lane # EB 1 WB 1 NB 1 NB 2 SB 1 Volume Total (vph) 68 369 181 62 562 Volume Left (vph) 5 48 15 0 420 Volume Right (vph) 7 262 0 62 9 Hadj (s) -0.05 -0.40 0.04 -0.70 0.14 Departure Headway (s) 7.3 6.1 7.0 6.3 6.1 Degree Utilization, x 0.14 0.62 0.35 0.11 0.95 Capacity (veh/h) 452 572 493 546 577 Control Delay (s) 11.5 18.5 12.6 8.8 49.8 Approach Delay (s) 11.5 18.5 11.6 49.8 Approach LOS B C B E Intersection Summary Delay 31.0 HCM Level of Service D Intersection Capacity Utilization 74.0% ICU Level of Service D Analysis Period (min) 15 HCM Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 9: NE 12th St & Harrington AV NE 10/16/2010 Alternative 2 PM (2015)Synchro 7 - Report Sunset Area Planned EIS Page 9 Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations Sign Control Stop Stop Stop Stop Volume (vph) 35 314 11 18 303 71 18 18 14 49 18 4 Peak Hour Factor 0.63 0.74 0.38 0.63 0.80 1.00 0.63 0.42 0.33 0.39 0.42 0.25 Hourly flow rate (vph) 56 424 29 29 379 71 29 43 42 126 43 16 Direction, Lane # EB 1 WB 1 NB 1 SB 1 Volume Total (vph) 509 478 114 184 Volume Left (vph) 56 29 29 126 Volume Right (vph) 29 71 42 16 Hadj (s) 0.02 -0.04 -0.14 0.12 Departure Headway (s) 5.9 5.9 7.3 7.2 Degree Utilization, x 0.84 0.79 0.23 0.37 Capacity (veh/h) 593 585 434 450 Control Delay (s) 32.3 27.4 12.4 14.4 Approach Delay (s) 32.3 27.4 12.4 14.4 Approach LOS D D B B Intersection Summary Delay 26.1 HCM Level of Service D Intersection Capacity Utilization 44.0% ICU Level of Service A Analysis Period (min) 15 HCM Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 10: NE 12th St & Kirkland Ave NE 10/16/2010 Alternative 2 PM (2015)Synchro 7 - Report Sunset Area Planned EIS Page 10 Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations Sign Control Stop Stop Stop Stop Volume (vph) 18 321 10 7 237 35 21 46 4 71 35 14 Peak Hour Factor 0.42 0.87 0.33 0.50 0.87 0.50 0.58 0.65 0.25 0.71 0.42 0.50 Hourly flow rate (vph) 43 369 30 14 272 70 36 71 16 100 83 28 Direction, Lane # EB 1 EB 2 WB 1 WB 2 NB 1 SB 1 Volume Total (vph) 227 215 150 206 123 211 Volume Left (vph) 43 0 14 0 36 100 Volume Right (vph) 0 30 0 70 16 28 Hadj (s) 0.13 -0.06 0.08 -0.20 0.01 0.05 Departure Headway (s) 6.3 6.1 6.3 6.0 6.4 6.2 Degree Utilization, x 0.40 0.36 0.26 0.35 0.22 0.36 Capacity (veh/h) 548 567 536 564 500 538 Control Delay (s) 12.1 11.3 10.4 11.0 11.1 12.6 Approach Delay (s) 11.7 10.8 11.1 12.6 Approach LOS B B B B Intersection Summary Delay 11.5 HCM Level of Service B Intersection Capacity Utilization 40.0% ICU Level of Service A Analysis Period (min) 15 HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 1: NE Sunset Blvd./NE Park & NE Sunset Blvd.10/16/2010 Alternative 2 PM (2030)Synchro 7 - Report Sunset Area Planned EIS Page 1 Movement EBT EBR WBL WBT NBL NBR Lane Configurations Volume (vph) 1621 91 183 1085 63 243 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Total Lost time (s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 Lane Util. Factor 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 Frt 0.99 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.85 Flt Protected 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 Satd. Flow (prot) 3506 1770 3539 1770 1583 Flt Permitted 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 Satd. Flow (perm) 3506 1770 3539 1770 1583 Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.99 0.83 0.81 0.95 0.78 0.85 Adj. Flow (vph) 1637 110 226 1142 81 286 RTOR Reduction (vph)50000251 Lane Group Flow (vph) 1742 0 226 1142 81 35 Turn Type Prot Prot Protected Phases 2 1644 Permitted Phases Actuated Green, G (s) 44.1 14.0 62.1 8.9 8.9 Effective Green, g (s) 46.1 15.0 64.1 9.9 9.9 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.58 0.19 0.80 0.12 0.12 Clearance Time (s) 5.0 4.0 5.0 4.0 4.0 Vehicle Extension (s) 5.0 3.0 5.0 3.0 3.0 Lane Grp Cap (vph) 2020 332 2836 219 196 v/s Ratio Prot c0.50 c0.13 0.32 c0.05 0.02 v/s Ratio Perm v/c Ratio 0.86 0.68 0.40 0.37 0.18 Uniform Delay, d1 14.3 30.3 2.3 32.2 31.4 Progression Factor 0.38 0.67 0.06 1.00 1.00 Incremental Delay, d2 4.6 4.8 0.4 1.1 0.4 Delay (s) 10.0 25.0 0.5 33.2 31.9 Level of Service B C A C C Approach Delay (s) 10.0 4.5 32.2 Approach LOS B A C Intersection Summary HCM Average Control Delay 10.2 HCM Level of Service B HCM Volume to Capacity ratio 0.76 Actuated Cycle Length (s) 80.0 Sum of lost time (s) 9.0 Intersection Capacity Utilization 72.0% ICU Level of Service C Analysis Period (min) 15 c Critical Lane Group HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 2: NE Sunset Blvd & Edmonds AV NE 10/16/2010 Alternative 2 PM (2030)Synchro 7 - Report Sunset Area Planned EIS Page 2 Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations Volume (vph) 153 1481 100 48 998 9 59 29 33 6 46 130 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Lane Width 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 11 12 12 11 12 Total Lost time (s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 Lane Util. Factor 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Frt 1.00 0.99 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.93 1.00 0.90 Flt Protected 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 Satd. Flow (prot) 1770 3495 1770 3532 1770 1679 1770 1615 Flt Permitted 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.31 1.00 0.64 1.00 Satd. Flow (perm) 1770 3495 1770 3532 573 1679 1186 1615 Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.85 0.95 0.71 0.86 0.89 0.58 0.84 0.52 0.72 0.63 0.66 0.84 Adj. Flow (vph) 180 1559 141 56 1121 16 70 56 46 10 70 155 RTOR Reduction (vph)050010039001300 Lane Group Flow (vph) 180 1695 0 56 1136 0 70 63 0 10 95 0 Turn Type Prot Prot Perm Perm Protected Phases 1 6 5 2 4 4 Permitted Phases 4 4 Actuated Green, G (s) 15.6 49.4 5.6 39.4 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 Effective Green, g (s) 16.6 51.4 6.6 41.4 13.0 13.0 13.0 13.0 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.21 0.64 0.08 0.52 0.16 0.16 0.16 0.16 Clearance Time (s) 4.0 5.0 4.0 5.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 Vehicle Extension (s) 4.0 6.0 4.0 6.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 Lane Grp Cap (vph) 367 2246 146 1828 93 273 193 262 v/s Ratio Prot 0.10 c0.48 0.03 c0.32 0.04 0.06 v/s Ratio Perm c0.12 0.01 v/c Ratio 0.49 0.75 0.38 0.62 0.75 0.23 0.05 0.36 Uniform Delay, d1 28.0 9.9 34.8 13.7 32.0 29.2 28.3 29.8 Progression Factor 0.90 0.73 1.06 0.50 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Incremental Delay, d2 0.8 1.4 2.0 1.4 30.1 0.6 0.2 1.2 Delay (s) 25.8 8.6 39.1 8.3 62.1 29.8 28.4 31.0 Level of Service C A D A E C C C Approach Delay (s) 10.3 9.8 42.9 30.9 Approach LOS B A D C Intersection Summary HCM Average Control Delay 13.1 HCM Level of Service B HCM Volume to Capacity ratio 0.75 Actuated Cycle Length (s) 80.0 Sum of lost time (s) 9.0 Intersection Capacity Utilization 74.5% ICU Level of Service D Analysis Period (min) 15 c Critical Lane Group HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 3: NE Sunset Blvd & Harrington AV NE 10/16/2010 Alternative 2 PM (2030)Synchro 7 - Report Sunset Area Planned EIS Page 3 Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations Volume (vph) 26 1419 54 81 1137 4 45 10 83 10 20 24 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Total Lost time (s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 Lane Util. Factor 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 Frt 1.00 0.99 1.00 1.00 0.92 0.94 Flt Protected 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.99 0.99 Satd. Flow (prot) 1770 3515 1770 3535 1685 1735 Flt Permitted 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.89 0.91 Satd. Flow (perm) 1770 3515 1770 3535 1528 1596 Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.75 0.90 0.72 0.86 0.92 0.38 0.90 0.50 0.75 0.67 0.57 0.59 Adj. Flow (vph) 35 1577 75 94 1236 11 50 20 111 15 35 41 RTOR Reduction (vph)03000008900350 Lane Group Flow (vph) 35 1649 0 94 1247 0 0 92 0 0 56 0 Turn Type Prot Prot Perm Perm Protected Phases 1 6 5 2 4 4 Permitted Phases 4 4 Actuated Green, G (s) 3.6 50.0 6.4 52.8 10.6 10.6 Effective Green, g (s) 4.6 52.0 7.4 54.8 11.6 11.6 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.06 0.65 0.09 0.68 0.14 0.14 Clearance Time (s) 4.0 5.0 4.0 5.0 4.0 4.0 Vehicle Extension (s) 4.0 6.0 4.0 6.0 4.0 4.0 Lane Grp Cap (vph) 102 2285 164 2421 222 231 v/s Ratio Prot 0.02 c0.47 c0.05 0.35 v/s Ratio Perm c0.06 0.04 v/c Ratio 0.34 0.72 0.57 0.51 0.41 0.24 Uniform Delay, d1 36.2 9.2 34.8 6.1 31.1 30.3 Progression Factor 0.68 0.37 0.64 0.77 1.00 1.00 Incremental Delay, d2 2.0 1.5 4.4 0.6 1.7 0.7 Delay (s) 26.7 4.9 26.6 5.3 32.8 31.1 Level of Service C A C A C C Approach Delay (s) 5.3 6.8 32.8 31.1 Approach LOS A A C C Intersection Summary HCM Average Control Delay 8.1 HCM Level of Service A HCM Volume to Capacity ratio 0.66 Actuated Cycle Length (s) 80.0 Sum of lost time (s) 9.0 Intersection Capacity Utilization 69.3% ICU Level of Service C Analysis Period (min) 15 c Critical Lane Group HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 4: NE 10th St & NE Sunset Blvd 10/16/2010 Alternative 2 PM (2030)Synchro 7 - Report Sunset Area Planned EIS Page 4 Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations Volume (vph) 16 55 29 139 43 41 48 1232 169 87 1087 9 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Total Lost time (s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 Lane Util. Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 Frt 0.96 0.97 1.00 0.98 1.00 1.00 Flt Protected 0.99 0.97 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 Satd. Flow (prot) 1778 1757 1770 3462 1770 3535 Flt Permitted 0.91 0.73 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 Satd. Flow (perm) 1643 1320 1770 3462 1770 3535 Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.65 0.92 0.96 0.67 0.77 0.63 0.68 0.96 0.77 0.83 0.94 0.88 Adj. Flow (vph) 25 60 30 207 56 65 71 1283 219 105 1156 10 RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 16 0 0 11 0 0 16 0000 Lane Group Flow (vph) 0 99 0 0 317 0 71 1486 0 105 1166 0 Turn Type Perm Perm Prot Prot Protected Phases 4 4 1 6 5 2 Permitted Phases 4 4 4 Actuated Green, G (s) 22.2 22.2 4.8 37.5 7.3 40.0 Effective Green, g (s) 23.2 23.2 5.8 39.5 8.3 42.0 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.29 0.29 0.07 0.49 0.10 0.52 Clearance Time (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 5.0 4.0 5.0 Vehicle Extension (s) 5.0 5.0 4.0 5.0 4.0 5.0 Lane Grp Cap (vph) 476 383 128 1709 184 1856 v/s Ratio Prot 0.04 c0.43 0.06 c0.33 v/s Ratio Perm 0.06 c0.24 v/c Ratio 0.21 0.83 0.55 0.87 0.57 0.63 Uniform Delay, d1 21.5 26.5 35.9 18.0 34.2 13.5 Progression Factor 0.98 1.00 0.61 0.36 1.30 0.81 Incremental Delay, d2 0.5 15.1 4.6 4.8 4.2 1.4 Delay (s) 21.4 41.6 26.4 11.2 48.6 12.2 Level of Service C D C B D B Approach Delay (s) 21.4 41.6 11.9 15.3 Approach LOS C D B B Intersection Summary HCM Average Control Delay 16.5 HCM Level of Service B HCM Volume to Capacity ratio 0.83 Actuated Cycle Length (s) 80.0 Sum of lost time (s) 9.0 Intersection Capacity Utilization 73.4% ICU Level of Service D Analysis Period (min) 15 c Critical Lane Group HCM Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 5: NE Sunset Blvd & Kirkland Ave NE 10/16/2010 Alternative 2 PM (2030)Synchro 7 - Report Sunset Area Planned EIS Page 5 Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations Volume (veh/h) 71 1221 8 0 938 4 0 0 34 0 0 94 Sign Control Free Free Stop Stop Grade 0% 0% 0% 0% Peak Hour Factor 0.79 0.90 0.50 0.50 0.90 0.25 0.75 0.25 0.33 0.90 0.25 0.63 Hourly flow rate (vph) 90 1357 16 0 1042 16 0 0 103 0 0 149 Pedestrians Lane Width (ft) Walking Speed (ft/s) Percent Blockage Right turn flare (veh) Median type None None Median storage veh) Upstream signal (ft) 1086 344 pX, platoon unblocked 0.75 0.68 0.81 0.81 0.68 0.81 0.81 0.75 vC, conflicting volume 1058 1373 2215 2603 686 2011 2603 529 vC1, stage 1 conf vol vC2, stage 2 conf vol vCu, unblocked vol 411 616 635 1115 0 383 1115 0 tC, single (s) 4.1 4.1 7.5 6.5 6.9 7.5 6.5 6.9 tC, 2 stage (s) tF (s) 2.2 2.2 3.5 4.0 3.3 3.5 4.0 3.3 p0 queue free % 90 100 100 100 86 100 100 82 cM capacity (veh/h) 858 655 220 149 740 352 149 813 Direction, Lane # EB 1 EB 2 EB 3 WB 1 WB 2 NB 1 SB 1 Volume Total 90 904 468 695 363 103 149 Volume Left 90 000000 Volume Right 0 0 16 0 16 103 149 cSH 858 1700 1700 1700 1700 740 813 Volume to Capacity 0.10 0.53 0.28 0.41 0.21 0.14 0.18 Queue Length 95th (ft)900001217 Control Delay (s) 9.7 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 10.6 10.4 Lane LOS A B B Approach Delay (s) 0.6 0.0 10.6 10.4 Approach LOS B B Intersection Summary Average Delay 1.3 Intersection Capacity Utilization 44.0% ICU Level of Service A Analysis Period (min) 15 HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 6: NE 12th St & NE Sunset Blvd 10/16/2010 Alternative 2 PM (2030)Synchro 7 - Report Sunset Area Planned EIS Page 6 Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations Volume (vph) 203 176 13 96 93 54 35 1094 125 95 833 157 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Lane Width 12 11 12 12 11 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 Total Lost time (s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 Lane Util. Factor 0.95 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 Frt 0.99 0.96 1.00 0.98 1.00 0.97 Flt Protected 0.98 0.98 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 Satd. Flow (prot) 3317 3222 1770 3480 1770 3448 Flt Permitted 0.98 0.98 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 Satd. Flow (perm) 3317 3222 1770 3480 1770 3448 Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.92 0.82 0.63 0.77 0.84 0.63 0.78 0.94 0.86 0.76 0.91 0.82 Adj. Flow (vph) 221 215 21 125 111 86 45 1164 145 125 915 191 RTOR Reduction (vph)040050001100190 Lane Group Flow (vph) 0 453 0 0 272 0 45 1298 0 125 1087 0 Turn Type Split Split Prot Prot Protected Phases 4 4 3 3 1 6 5 2 Permitted Phases Actuated Green, G (s) 15.6 11.8 4.1 28.0 7.6 31.5 Effective Green, g (s) 16.6 12.8 5.1 30.0 8.6 33.5 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.21 0.16 0.06 0.38 0.11 0.42 Clearance Time (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 5.0 4.0 5.0 Vehicle Extension (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 Lane Grp Cap (vph) 688 516 113 1305 190 1444 v/s Ratio Prot c0.14 c0.08 0.03 c0.37 0.07 c0.32 v/s Ratio Perm v/c Ratio 0.66 0.53 0.40 0.99 0.66 0.75 Uniform Delay, d1 29.1 30.8 36.0 24.9 34.3 19.7 Progression Factor 1.00 1.00 1.18 0.44 1.00 1.00 Incremental Delay, d2 2.5 1.3 2.1 19.0 8.8 3.7 Delay (s) 31.6 32.1 44.6 30.1 43.1 23.4 Level of Service C C D C D C Approach Delay (s) 31.6 32.1 30.5 25.4 Approach LOS CCCC Intersection Summary HCM Average Control Delay 29.0 HCM Level of Service C HCM Volume to Capacity ratio 0.79 Actuated Cycle Length (s) 80.0 Sum of lost time (s) 9.0 Intersection Capacity Utilization 71.2% ICU Level of Service C Analysis Period (min) 15 c Critical Lane Group HCM Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 7: NE Sunset Blvd & Monroe Ave NE 10/16/2010 Alternative 2 PM (2030)Synchro 7 - Report Sunset Area Planned EIS Page 7 Movement EBT EBR WBL WBT NBL NBR Lane Configurations Volume (veh/h) 1336 15 4 1084 0 19 Sign Control Free Free Stop Grade 0% 0% 0% Peak Hour Factor 0.90 0.50 0.25 0.90 0.90 0.63 Hourly flow rate (vph) 1484 30 16 1204 0 30 Pedestrians Lane Width (ft) Walking Speed (ft/s) Percent Blockage Right turn flare (veh) 2 Median type None None Median storage veh) Upstream signal (ft) 1166 pX, platoon unblocked 0.70 0.70 0.70 vC, conflicting volume 1514 2134 757 vC1, stage 1 conf vol vC2, stage 2 conf vol vCu, unblocked vol 875 1761 0 tC, single (s) 4.1 6.8 6.9 tC, 2 stage (s) tF (s) 2.2 3.5 3.3 p0 queue free % 97 100 96 cM capacity (veh/h) 536 51 758 Direction, Lane # EB 1 EB 2 WB 1 WB 2 WB 3 NB 1 Volume Total 990 525 16 602 602 30 Volume Left 0 0 16 0 0 0 Volume Right 0 30 0 0 0 30 cSH 1700 1700 536 1700 1700 379 Volume to Capacity 0.58 0.31 0.03 0.35 0.35 0.08 Queue Length 95th (ft)002006 Control Delay (s) 0.0 0.0 11.9 0.0 0.0 15.3 Lane LOS B C Approach Delay (s) 0.0 0.2 15.3 Approach LOS C Intersection Summary Average Delay 0.2 Intersection Capacity Utilization 47.4% ICU Level of Service A Analysis Period (min) 15 HCM Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 8: NE 12th St & Edmonds AV NE 10/16/2010 Alternative 2 PM (2030)Synchro 7 - Report Sunset Area Planned EIS Page 8 Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations Sign Control Stop Stop Stop Stop Volume (vph) 4 49 6 48 58 260 15 167 61 407 129 9 Peak Hour Factor 0.82 0.82 0.82 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.91 0.91 0.91 Hourly flow rate (vph) 5 60 7 52 62 280 16 178 65 447 142 10 Direction, Lane # EB 1 WB 1 NB 1 NB 2 SB 1 Volume Total (vph) 72 394 194 65 599 Volume Left (vph) 5 52 16 0 447 Volume Right (vph) 7 280 0 65 10 Hadj (s) -0.05 -0.40 0.04 -0.70 0.14 Departure Headway (s) 7.5 6.2 7.1 6.4 6.3 Degree Utilization, x 0.15 0.68 0.38 0.12 1.04 Capacity (veh/h) 430 568 474 534 565 Control Delay (s) 11.8 21.1 13.3 9.0 74.2 Approach Delay (s) 11.8 21.1 12.2 74.2 Approach LOS B C B F Intersection Summary Delay 42.9 HCM Level of Service E Intersection Capacity Utilization 77.9% ICU Level of Service D Analysis Period (min) 15 HCM Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 9: NE 12th St & Harrington AV NE 10/16/2010 Alternative 2 PM (2030)Synchro 7 - Report Sunset Area Planned EIS Page 9 Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations Sign Control Stop Stop Stop Stop Volume (vph) 38 334 11 19 323 75 19 19 15 53 19 4 Peak Hour Factor 0.63 0.74 0.38 0.63 0.80 1.00 0.63 0.42 0.33 0.39 0.42 0.25 Hourly flow rate (vph) 60 451 29 30 404 75 30 45 45 136 45 16 Direction, Lane # EB 1 WB 1 NB 1 SB 1 Volume Total (vph) 541 509 121 197 Volume Left (vph) 60 30 30 136 Volume Right (vph) 29 75 45 16 Hadj (s) 0.02 -0.04 -0.14 0.12 Departure Headway (s) 6.2 6.2 7.7 7.6 Degree Utilization, x 0.94 0.88 0.26 0.42 Capacity (veh/h) 561 566 436 448 Control Delay (s) 48.3 39.1 13.4 16.0 Approach Delay (s) 48.3 39.1 13.4 16.0 Approach LOS E E B C Intersection Summary Delay 37.2 HCM Level of Service E Intersection Capacity Utilization 46.8% ICU Level of Service A Analysis Period (min) 15 HCM Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 10: NE 12th St & Kirkland Ave NE 10/16/2010 Alternative 2 PM (2030)Synchro 7 - Report Sunset Area Planned EIS Page 10 Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations Sign Control Stop Stop Stop Stop Volume (vph) 19 342 11 8 252 38 22 49 4 75 38 15 Peak Hour Factor 0.42 0.87 0.33 0.50 0.87 0.50 0.58 0.65 0.25 0.71 0.42 0.50 Hourly flow rate (vph) 45 393 33 16 290 76 38 75 16 106 90 30 Direction, Lane # EB 1 EB 2 WB 1 WB 2 NB 1 SB 1 Volume Total (vph) 242 230 161 221 129 226 Volume Left (vph) 45 0 16 0 38 106 Volume Right (vph) 0 33 0 76 16 30 Hadj (s) 0.13 -0.07 0.08 -0.21 0.02 0.05 Departure Headway (s) 6.4 6.2 6.5 6.2 6.6 6.3 Degree Utilization, x 0.43 0.40 0.29 0.38 0.24 0.40 Capacity (veh/h) 534 553 522 548 483 523 Control Delay (s) 13.0 12.1 11.0 11.8 11.6 13.5 Approach Delay (s) 12.6 11.5 11.6 13.5 Approach LOS B B B B Intersection Summary Delay 12.3 HCM Level of Service B Intersection Capacity Utilization 42.0% ICU Level of Service A Analysis Period (min) 15 HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 1: NE Sunset Blvd./NE Park & NE Sunset Blvd.10/16/2010 Alternative 3 PM (2015)Synchro 7 - Report Sunset Area Planned EIS Page 1 Movement EBT EBR WBL WBT NBL NBR Lane Configurations Volume (vph) 1549 87 175 1037 60 232 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Total Lost time (s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 Lane Util. Factor 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 Frt 0.99 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.85 Flt Protected 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 Satd. Flow (prot) 3506 1770 3539 1770 1583 Flt Permitted 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 Satd. Flow (perm) 3506 1770 3539 1770 1583 Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.99 0.83 0.81 0.95 0.78 0.85 Adj. Flow (vph) 1565 105 216 1092 77 273 RTOR Reduction (vph)50000240 Lane Group Flow (vph) 1665 0 216 1092 77 33 Turn Type Prot Prot Protected Phases 2 1644 Permitted Phases Actuated Green, G (s) 44.3 14.0 62.3 8.7 8.7 Effective Green, g (s) 46.3 15.0 64.3 9.7 9.7 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.58 0.19 0.80 0.12 0.12 Clearance Time (s) 5.0 4.0 5.0 4.0 4.0 Vehicle Extension (s) 5.0 3.0 5.0 3.0 3.0 Lane Grp Cap (vph) 2029 332 2844 215 192 v/s Ratio Prot c0.48 c0.12 0.31 c0.04 0.02 v/s Ratio Perm v/c Ratio 0.82 0.65 0.38 0.36 0.17 Uniform Delay, d1 13.5 30.1 2.2 32.3 31.5 Progression Factor 0.37 0.67 0.06 1.00 1.00 Incremental Delay, d2 3.3 3.9 0.3 1.0 0.4 Delay (s) 8.4 24.0 0.5 33.3 32.0 Level of Service A C A C C Approach Delay (s) 8.4 4.4 32.3 Approach LOS A A C Intersection Summary HCM Average Control Delay 9.3 HCM Level of Service A HCM Volume to Capacity ratio 0.72 Actuated Cycle Length (s) 80.0 Sum of lost time (s) 9.0 Intersection Capacity Utilization 69.4% ICU Level of Service C Analysis Period (min) 15 c Critical Lane Group HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 2: NE Sunset Blvd & Edmonds AV NE 10/16/2010 Alternative 3 PM (2015)Synchro 7 - Report Sunset Area Planned EIS Page 2 Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations Volume (vph) 146 1415 96 45 953 8 56 28 31 6 44 124 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Lane Width 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 11 12 12 11 12 Total Lost time (s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 Lane Util. Factor 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Frt 1.00 0.99 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.93 1.00 0.90 Flt Protected 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 Satd. Flow (prot) 1770 3495 1770 3532 1770 1681 1770 1615 Flt Permitted 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.32 1.00 0.65 1.00 Satd. Flow (perm) 1770 3495 1770 3532 596 1681 1206 1615 Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.85 0.95 0.71 0.86 0.89 0.58 0.84 0.52 0.72 0.63 0.66 0.84 Adj. Flow (vph) 172 1489 135 52 1071 14 67 54 43 10 67 148 RTOR Reduction (vph)050010036001250 Lane Group Flow (vph) 172 1619 0 52 1084 0 67 61 0 10 90 0 Turn Type Prot Prot Perm Perm Protected Phases 1 6 5 2 4 4 Permitted Phases 4 4 Actuated Green, G (s) 15.6 50.1 5.4 39.9 11.5 11.5 11.5 11.5 Effective Green, g (s) 16.6 52.1 6.4 41.9 12.5 12.5 12.5 12.5 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.21 0.65 0.08 0.52 0.16 0.16 0.16 0.16 Clearance Time (s) 4.0 5.0 4.0 5.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 Vehicle Extension (s) 4.0 6.0 4.0 6.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 Lane Grp Cap (vph) 367 2276 142 1850 93 263 188 252 v/s Ratio Prot 0.10 c0.46 0.03 c0.31 0.04 0.06 v/s Ratio Perm c0.11 0.01 v/c Ratio 0.47 0.71 0.37 0.59 0.72 0.23 0.05 0.36 Uniform Delay, d1 27.8 9.1 34.9 13.1 32.1 29.5 28.7 30.2 Progression Factor 0.89 0.70 1.09 0.52 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Incremental Delay, d2 0.8 1.2 2.0 1.2 25.3 0.6 0.2 1.2 Delay (s) 25.7 7.5 40.1 8.0 57.3 30.2 28.9 31.4 Level of Service C A D A E C C C Approach Delay (s) 9.3 9.5 41.3 31.2 Approach LOS A A D C Intersection Summary HCM Average Control Delay 12.4 HCM Level of Service B HCM Volume to Capacity ratio 0.71 Actuated Cycle Length (s) 80.0 Sum of lost time (s) 9.0 Intersection Capacity Utilization 72.1% ICU Level of Service C Analysis Period (min) 15 c Critical Lane Group HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 3: NE Sunset Blvd & Harrington AV NE 10/16/2010 Alternative 3 PM (2015)Synchro 7 - Report Sunset Area Planned EIS Page 3 Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations Volume (vph) 25 1355 51 86 1106 4 43 10 79 2 3 3 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Total Lost time (s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 Lane Util. Factor 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 Frt 1.00 0.99 1.00 1.00 0.92 0.95 Flt Protected 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.99 0.99 Satd. Flow (prot) 1770 3515 1770 3534 1687 1746 Flt Permitted 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.91 0.95 Satd. Flow (perm) 1770 3515 1770 3534 1559 1675 Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.75 0.90 0.72 0.86 0.92 0.38 0.90 0.50 0.75 0.67 0.57 0.59 Adj. Flow (vph) 33 1506 71 100 1202 11 48 20 105 3 5 5 RTOR Reduction (vph)0300100870040 Lane Group Flow (vph) 33 1574 0 100 1212 0 0 86 0090 Turn Type Prot Prot Perm Perm Protected Phases 1 6 5 2 4 4 Permitted Phases 4 4 Actuated Green, G (s) 2.4 49.6 7.2 54.4 10.2 10.2 Effective Green, g (s) 3.4 51.6 8.2 56.4 11.2 11.2 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.04 0.65 0.10 0.70 0.14 0.14 Clearance Time (s) 4.0 5.0 4.0 5.0 4.0 4.0 Vehicle Extension (s) 4.0 6.0 4.0 6.0 4.0 4.0 Lane Grp Cap (vph) 75 2267 181 2491 218 235 v/s Ratio Prot 0.02 c0.45 c0.06 c0.34 v/s Ratio Perm c0.06 0.01 v/c Ratio 0.44 0.69 0.55 0.49 0.40 0.04 Uniform Delay, d1 37.4 9.1 34.2 5.3 31.3 29.7 Progression Factor 0.71 0.28 0.66 0.68 1.00 1.00 Incremental Delay, d2 4.2 1.4 3.5 0.5 1.6 0.1 Delay (s) 30.6 3.9 26.0 4.1 32.9 29.8 Level of Service C A C A C C Approach Delay (s) 4.4 5.8 32.9 29.8 Approach LOS A A C C Intersection Summary HCM Average Control Delay 6.7 HCM Level of Service A HCM Volume to Capacity ratio 0.62 Actuated Cycle Length (s) 80.0 Sum of lost time (s) 6.0 Intersection Capacity Utilization 65.3% ICU Level of Service C Analysis Period (min) 15 c Critical Lane Group HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 4: NE 10th St & NE Sunset Blvd 10/16/2010 Alternative 3 PM (2015)Synchro 7 - Report Sunset Area Planned EIS Page 4 Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations Volume (vph) 24 61 56 133 41 39 45 1169 161 83 1038 8 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Total Lost time (s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 Lane Util. Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 Frt 0.95 0.97 1.00 0.98 1.00 1.00 Flt Protected 0.99 0.97 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 Satd. Flow (prot) 1752 1757 1770 3461 1770 3535 Flt Permitted 0.90 0.67 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 Satd. Flow (perm) 1593 1212 1770 3461 1770 3535 Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.65 0.92 0.96 0.67 0.77 0.63 0.68 0.96 0.77 0.83 0.94 0.88 Adj. Flow (vph) 37 66 58 199 53 62 66 1218 209 100 1104 9 RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 26 0 0 11 0 0 16 0000 Lane Group Flow (vph) 0 135 0 0 303 0 66 1411 0 100 1113 0 Turn Type Perm Perm Prot Prot Protected Phases 4 4 1 6 5 2 Permitted Phases 4 4 4 Actuated Green, G (s) 22.5 22.5 4.8 37.3 7.2 39.7 Effective Green, g (s) 23.5 23.5 5.8 39.3 8.2 41.7 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.29 0.29 0.07 0.49 0.10 0.52 Clearance Time (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 5.0 4.0 5.0 Vehicle Extension (s) 5.0 5.0 4.0 5.0 4.0 5.0 Lane Grp Cap (vph) 468 356 128 1700 181 1843 v/s Ratio Prot 0.04 c0.41 0.06 c0.31 v/s Ratio Perm 0.08 c0.25 v/c Ratio 0.29 0.85 0.52 0.83 0.55 0.60 Uniform Delay, d1 21.8 26.6 35.7 17.5 34.2 13.4 Progression Factor 0.98 1.00 0.60 0.35 1.29 0.79 Incremental Delay, d2 0.7 18.8 3.5 3.8 3.8 1.3 Delay (s) 22.1 45.4 25.0 9.9 48.0 11.8 Level of Service C D C A D B Approach Delay (s) 22.1 45.4 10.5 14.8 Approach LOS C D B B Intersection Summary HCM Average Control Delay 16.2 HCM Level of Service B HCM Volume to Capacity ratio 0.81 Actuated Cycle Length (s) 80.0 Sum of lost time (s) 9.0 Intersection Capacity Utilization 70.6% ICU Level of Service C Analysis Period (min) 15 c Critical Lane Group HCM Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 5: NE Sunset Blvd & Kirkland Ave NE 10/16/2010 Alternative 3 PM (2015)Synchro 7 - Report Sunset Area Planned EIS Page 5 Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations Volume (veh/h) 68 1166 7 0 896 4 0 0 33 0 0 90 Sign Control Free Free Stop Stop Grade 0% 0% 0% 0% Peak Hour Factor 0.79 0.90 0.50 0.50 0.90 0.25 0.75 0.25 0.33 0.90 0.25 0.63 Hourly flow rate (vph) 86 1296 14 0 996 16 0 0 100 0 0 143 Pedestrians Lane Width (ft) Walking Speed (ft/s) Percent Blockage Right turn flare (veh) Median type None None Median storage veh) Upstream signal (ft) 1086 344 pX, platoon unblocked 0.77 0.72 0.83 0.83 0.72 0.83 0.83 0.77 vC, conflicting volume 1012 1310 2115 2486 655 1923 2485 506 vC1, stage 1 conf vol vC2, stage 2 conf vol vCu, unblocked vol 420 651 703 1147 0 473 1146 0 tC, single (s) 4.1 4.1 7.5 6.5 6.9 7.5 6.5 6.9 tC, 2 stage (s) tF (s) 2.2 2.2 3.5 4.0 3.3 3.5 4.0 3.3 p0 queue free % 90 100 100 100 87 100 100 83 cM capacity (veh/h) 875 670 208 149 780 319 149 836 Direction, Lane # EB 1 EB 2 EB 3 WB 1 WB 2 NB 1 SB 1 Volume Total 86 864 446 664 348 100 143 Volume Left 86 000000 Volume Right 0 0 14 0 16 100 143 cSH 875 1700 1700 1700 1700 780 836 Volume to Capacity 0.10 0.51 0.26 0.39 0.20 0.13 0.17 Queue Length 95th (ft)800001115 Control Delay (s) 9.6 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 10.3 10.2 Lane LOS A B B Approach Delay (s) 0.6 0.0 10.3 10.2 Approach LOS B B Intersection Summary Average Delay 1.2 Intersection Capacity Utilization 42.5% ICU Level of Service A Analysis Period (min) 15 HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 6: NE 12th St & NE Sunset Blvd 10/16/2010 Alternative 3 PM (2015)Synchro 7 - Report Sunset Area Planned EIS Page 6 Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations Volume (vph) 194 168 12 92 89 51 34 1045 120 91 795 150 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Lane Width 12 11 12 12 11 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 Total Lost time (s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 Lane Util. Factor 0.95 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 Frt 0.99 0.96 1.00 0.98 1.00 0.97 Flt Protected 0.98 0.98 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 Satd. Flow (prot) 3318 3223 1770 3480 1770 3447 Flt Permitted 0.98 0.98 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 Satd. Flow (perm) 3318 3223 1770 3480 1770 3447 Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.92 0.82 0.63 0.77 0.84 0.63 0.78 0.94 0.86 0.76 0.91 0.82 Adj. Flow (vph) 211 205 19 119 106 81 44 1112 140 120 874 183 RTOR Reduction (vph)040049001100190 Lane Group Flow (vph) 0 431 0 0 257 0 44 1241 0 120 1038 0 Turn Type Split Split Prot Prot Protected Phases 4 4 3 3 1 6 5 2 Permitted Phases Actuated Green, G (s) 15.3 11.4 4.3 28.7 7.6 32.0 Effective Green, g (s) 16.3 12.4 5.3 30.7 8.6 34.0 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.20 0.16 0.07 0.38 0.11 0.42 Clearance Time (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 5.0 4.0 5.0 Vehicle Extension (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 Lane Grp Cap (vph) 676 500 117 1335 190 1465 v/s Ratio Prot c0.13 c0.08 0.02 c0.36 0.07 c0.30 v/s Ratio Perm v/c Ratio 0.64 0.51 0.38 0.93 0.63 0.71 Uniform Delay, d1 29.1 31.0 35.8 23.6 34.2 18.9 Progression Factor 1.00 1.00 1.20 0.42 1.00 1.00 Incremental Delay, d2 2.2 1.2 1.9 9.6 7.5 2.9 Delay (s) 31.4 32.2 44.7 19.5 41.7 21.8 Level of Service C C D B D C Approach Delay (s) 31.4 32.2 20.3 23.9 Approach LOS CCCC Intersection Summary HCM Average Control Delay 24.3 HCM Level of Service C HCM Volume to Capacity ratio 0.75 Actuated Cycle Length (s) 80.0 Sum of lost time (s) 9.0 Intersection Capacity Utilization 68.6% ICU Level of Service C Analysis Period (min) 15 c Critical Lane Group HCM Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 7: NE Sunset Blvd & Monroe Ave NE 10/16/2010 Alternative 3 PM (2015)Synchro 7 - Report Sunset Area Planned EIS Page 7 Movement EBT EBR WBL WBT NBL NBR Lane Configurations Volume (veh/h) 1276 14 4 1036 0 18 Sign Control Free Free Stop Grade 0% 0% 0% Peak Hour Factor 0.90 0.50 0.25 0.90 0.90 0.63 Hourly flow rate (vph) 1418 28 16 1151 0 29 Pedestrians Lane Width (ft) Walking Speed (ft/s) Percent Blockage Right turn flare (veh) 2 Median type None None Median storage veh) Upstream signal (ft) 1166 pX, platoon unblocked 0.71 0.71 0.71 vC, conflicting volume 1446 2039 723 vC1, stage 1 conf vol vC2, stage 2 conf vol vCu, unblocked vol 826 1656 0 tC, single (s) 4.1 6.8 6.9 tC, 2 stage (s) tF (s) 2.2 3.5 3.3 p0 queue free % 97 100 96 cM capacity (veh/h) 572 62 775 Direction, Lane # EB 1 EB 2 WB 1 WB 2 WB 3 NB 1 Volume Total 945 501 16 576 576 29 Volume Left 0 0 16 0 0 0 Volume Right 0 28 0 0 0 29 cSH 1700 1700 572 1700 1700 388 Volume to Capacity 0.56 0.29 0.03 0.34 0.34 0.07 Queue Length 95th (ft)002006 Control Delay (s) 0.0 0.0 11.5 0.0 0.0 15.0 Lane LOS B C Approach Delay (s) 0.0 0.2 15.0 Approach LOS C Intersection Summary Average Delay 0.2 Intersection Capacity Utilization 45.7% ICU Level of Service A Analysis Period (min) 15 HCM Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 8: NE 12th St & Edmonds AV NE 10/16/2010 Alternative 3 PM (2015)Synchro 7 - Report Sunset Area Planned EIS Page 8 Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations Sign Control Stop Stop Stop Stop Volume (vph) 4 47 6 45 55 249 14 159 59 389 123 8 Peak Hour Factor 0.82 0.82 0.82 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.91 0.91 0.91 Hourly flow rate (vph) 5 57 7 48 59 268 15 169 63 427 135 9 Direction, Lane # EB 1 WB 1 NB 1 NB 2 SB 1 Volume Total (vph) 70 375 184 63 571 Volume Left (vph) 5 48 15 0 427 Volume Right (vph) 7 268 0 63 9 Hadj (s) -0.05 -0.40 0.04 -0.70 0.14 Departure Headway (s) 7.4 6.1 7.1 6.3 6.1 Degree Utilization, x 0.14 0.64 0.36 0.11 0.98 Capacity (veh/h) 438 571 491 543 574 Control Delay (s) 11.7 19.4 12.9 8.9 55.8 Approach Delay (s) 11.7 19.4 11.9 55.8 Approach LOS B C B F Intersection Summary Delay 34.0 HCM Level of Service D Intersection Capacity Utilization 75.0% ICU Level of Service D Analysis Period (min) 15 HCM Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 9: NE 12th St & Harrington AV NE 10/16/2010 Alternative 3 PM (2015)Synchro 7 - Report Sunset Area Planned EIS Page 9 Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations Sign Control Stop Stop Stop Stop Volume (vph) 36 319 11 18 309 72 18 18 14 50 18 4 Peak Hour Factor 0.63 0.74 0.38 0.63 0.80 1.00 0.63 0.42 0.33 0.39 0.42 0.25 Hourly flow rate (vph) 57 431 29 29 386 72 29 43 42 128 43 16 Direction, Lane # EB 1 WB 1 NB 1 SB 1 Volume Total (vph) 517 487 114 187 Volume Left (vph) 57 29 29 128 Volume Right (vph) 29 72 42 16 Hadj (s) 0.02 -0.04 -0.14 0.12 Departure Headway (s) 6.0 6.0 7.3 7.3 Degree Utilization, x 0.86 0.81 0.23 0.38 Capacity (veh/h) 587 582 432 451 Control Delay (s) 35.0 29.4 12.6 14.7 Approach Delay (s) 35.0 29.4 12.6 14.7 Approach LOS E D B B Intersection Summary Delay 28.0 HCM Level of Service D Intersection Capacity Utilization 44.9% ICU Level of Service A Analysis Period (min) 15 HCM Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 10: NE 12th St & Kirkland Ave NE 10/16/2010 Alternative 3 PM (2015)Synchro 7 - Report Sunset Area Planned EIS Page 10 Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations Sign Control Stop Stop Stop Stop Volume (vph) 18 327 10 7 241 36 21 47 4 72 36 14 Peak Hour Factor 0.42 0.87 0.33 0.50 0.87 0.50 0.58 0.65 0.25 0.71 0.42 0.50 Hourly flow rate (vph) 43 376 30 14 277 72 36 72 16 101 86 28 Direction, Lane # EB 1 EB 2 WB 1 WB 2 NB 1 SB 1 Volume Total (vph) 231 218 153 211 125 215 Volume Left (vph) 43 0 14 0 36 101 Volume Right (vph) 0 30 0 72 16 28 Hadj (s) 0.13 -0.06 0.08 -0.21 0.02 0.05 Departure Headway (s) 6.3 6.1 6.4 6.1 6.4 6.2 Degree Utilization, x 0.40 0.37 0.27 0.36 0.22 0.37 Capacity (veh/h) 544 563 533 560 495 533 Control Delay (s) 12.3 11.5 10.5 11.2 11.2 12.8 Approach Delay (s) 11.9 10.9 11.2 12.8 Approach LOS B B B B Intersection Summary Delay 11.7 HCM Level of Service B Intersection Capacity Utilization 40.7% ICU Level of Service A Analysis Period (min) 15 HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 1: NE Sunset Blvd./NE Park & NE Sunset Blvd.10/16/2010 Alternative 3 PM (2030)Synchro 7 - Report Sunset Area Planned EIS Page 1 Movement EBT EBR WBL WBT NBL NBR Lane Configurations Volume (vph) 1708 96 193 1144 66 256 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Total Lost time (s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 Lane Util. Factor 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 Frt 0.99 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.85 Flt Protected 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 Satd. Flow (prot) 3506 1770 3539 1770 1583 Flt Permitted 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 Satd. Flow (perm) 3506 1770 3539 1770 1583 Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.99 0.83 0.81 0.95 0.78 0.85 Adj. Flow (vph) 1725 116 238 1204 85 301 RTOR Reduction (vph)50000263 Lane Group Flow (vph) 1836 0 238 1204 85 38 Turn Type Prot Prot Protected Phases 2 1644 Permitted Phases Actuated Green, G (s) 43.9 14.0 61.9 9.1 9.1 Effective Green, g (s) 45.9 15.0 63.9 10.1 10.1 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.57 0.19 0.80 0.13 0.13 Clearance Time (s) 5.0 4.0 5.0 4.0 4.0 Vehicle Extension (s) 5.0 3.0 5.0 3.0 3.0 Lane Grp Cap (vph) 2012 332 2827 223 200 v/s Ratio Prot c0.52 c0.13 0.34 c0.05 0.02 v/s Ratio Perm v/c Ratio 0.91 0.72 0.43 0.38 0.19 Uniform Delay, d1 15.3 30.5 2.5 32.1 31.3 Progression Factor 0.41 0.63 0.06 1.00 1.00 Incremental Delay, d2 7.1 5.9 0.4 1.1 0.5 Delay (s) 13.4 25.2 0.5 33.2 31.8 Level of Service B C A C C Approach Delay (s) 13.4 4.6 32.1 Approach LOS B A C Intersection Summary HCM Average Control Delay 11.9 HCM Level of Service B HCM Volume to Capacity ratio 0.80 Actuated Cycle Length (s) 80.0 Sum of lost time (s) 9.0 Intersection Capacity Utilization 75.1% ICU Level of Service D Analysis Period (min) 15 c Critical Lane Group HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 2: NE Sunset Blvd & Edmonds AV NE 10/16/2010 Alternative 3 PM (2030)Synchro 7 - Report Sunset Area Planned EIS Page 2 Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations Volume (vph) 161 1560 106 50 1051 9 62 30 34 7 49 137 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Lane Width 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 11 12 12 11 12 Total Lost time (s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 Lane Util. Factor 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Frt 1.00 0.99 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.93 1.00 0.90 Flt Protected 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 Satd. Flow (prot) 1770 3495 1770 3532 1770 1680 1770 1615 Flt Permitted 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.30 1.00 0.63 1.00 Satd. Flow (perm) 1770 3495 1770 3532 552 1680 1180 1615 Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.85 0.95 0.71 0.86 0.89 0.58 0.84 0.52 0.72 0.63 0.66 0.84 Adj. Flow (vph) 189 1642 149 58 1181 16 74 58 47 11 74 163 RTOR Reduction (vph)050010039001280 Lane Group Flow (vph) 189 1786 0 58 1196 0 74 66 0 11 109 0 Turn Type Prot Prot Perm Perm Protected Phases 1 6 5 2 4 4 Permitted Phases 4 4 Actuated Green, G (s) 15.5 48.7 5.6 38.8 12.7 12.7 12.7 12.7 Effective Green, g (s) 16.5 50.7 6.6 40.8 13.7 13.7 13.7 13.7 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.21 0.63 0.08 0.51 0.17 0.17 0.17 0.17 Clearance Time (s) 4.0 5.0 4.0 5.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 Vehicle Extension (s) 4.0 6.0 4.0 6.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 Lane Grp Cap (vph) 365 2215 146 1801 95 288 202 277 v/s Ratio Prot 0.11 c0.51 0.03 c0.34 0.04 0.07 v/s Ratio Perm c0.13 0.01 v/c Ratio 0.52 0.81 0.40 0.66 0.78 0.23 0.05 0.39 Uniform Delay, d1 28.2 11.0 34.8 14.5 31.7 28.6 27.7 29.4 Progression Factor 0.89 0.73 1.03 0.48 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Incremental Delay, d2 0.8 1.7 2.1 1.7 33.8 0.6 0.2 1.3 Delay (s) 25.9 9.7 37.9 8.6 65.5 29.2 27.9 30.7 Level of Service C A D A E C C C Approach Delay (s) 11.3 10.0 44.2 30.6 Approach LOS B A D C Intersection Summary HCM Average Control Delay 13.7 HCM Level of Service B HCM Volume to Capacity ratio 0.79 Actuated Cycle Length (s) 80.0 Sum of lost time (s) 9.0 Intersection Capacity Utilization 77.6% ICU Level of Service D Analysis Period (min) 15 c Critical Lane Group HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 3: NE Sunset Blvd & Harrington AV NE 10/16/2010 Alternative 3 PM (2030)Synchro 7 - Report Sunset Area Planned EIS Page 3 Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations Volume (vph) 28 1494 57 93 1218 4 47 11 87 2 4 5 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Total Lost time (s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 Lane Util. Factor 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 Frt 1.00 0.99 1.00 1.00 0.92 0.94 Flt Protected 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.99 0.99 Satd. Flow (prot) 1770 3515 1770 3535 1686 1737 Flt Permitted 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.91 0.96 Satd. Flow (perm) 1770 3515 1770 3535 1558 1684 Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.75 0.90 0.72 0.86 0.92 0.38 0.90 0.50 0.75 0.67 0.57 0.59 Adj. Flow (vph) 37 1660 79 108 1324 11 52 22 116 3 7 8 RTOR Reduction (vph)0300000880070 Lane Group Flow (vph) 37 1736 0 108 1335 0 0 102 0 0 11 0 Turn Type Prot Prot Perm Perm Protected Phases 1 6 5 2 4 4 Permitted Phases 4 4 Actuated Green, G (s) 3.6 49.6 6.4 52.4 11.0 11.0 Effective Green, g (s) 4.6 51.6 7.4 54.4 12.0 12.0 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.06 0.65 0.09 0.68 0.15 0.15 Clearance Time (s) 4.0 5.0 4.0 5.0 4.0 4.0 Vehicle Extension (s) 4.0 6.0 4.0 6.0 4.0 4.0 Lane Grp Cap (vph) 102 2267 164 2404 234 253 v/s Ratio Prot 0.02 c0.49 c0.06 0.38 v/s Ratio Perm c0.07 0.01 v/c Ratio 0.36 0.77 0.66 0.56 0.44 0.04 Uniform Delay, d1 36.3 10.0 35.1 6.6 30.9 29.1 Progression Factor 0.65 0.42 0.65 0.73 1.00 1.00 Incremental Delay, d2 2.0 1.7 7.3 0.7 1.8 0.1 Delay (s) 25.6 5.9 30.2 5.5 32.7 29.2 Level of Service C A C A C C Approach Delay (s) 6.3 7.3 32.7 29.2 Approach LOS A A C C Intersection Summary HCM Average Control Delay 8.3 HCM Level of Service A HCM Volume to Capacity ratio 0.70 Actuated Cycle Length (s) 80.0 Sum of lost time (s) 9.0 Intersection Capacity Utilization 72.9% ICU Level of Service C Analysis Period (min) 15 c Critical Lane Group HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 4: NE 10th St & NE Sunset Blvd 10/16/2010 Alternative 3 PM (2030)Synchro 7 - Report Sunset Area Planned EIS Page 4 Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations Volume (vph) 26 68 57 147 45 44 50 1289 178 91 1145 9 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Total Lost time (s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 Lane Util. Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 Frt 0.95 0.97 1.00 0.98 1.00 1.00 Flt Protected 0.99 0.97 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 Satd. Flow (prot) 1757 1757 1770 3461 1770 3535 Flt Permitted 0.89 0.66 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 Satd. Flow (perm) 1584 1196 1770 3461 1770 3535 Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.65 0.92 0.96 0.67 0.77 0.63 0.68 0.96 0.77 0.83 0.94 0.88 Adj. Flow (vph) 40 74 59 219 58 70 74 1343 231 110 1218 10 RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 24 0 0 12 0 0 17 0000 Lane Group Flow (vph) 0 149 0 0 335 0 74 1557 0 110 1228 0 Turn Type Perm Perm Prot Prot Protected Phases 4 4 1 6 5 2 Permitted Phases 4 4 4 Actuated Green, G (s) 23.5 23.5 4.8 36.3 7.2 38.7 Effective Green, g (s) 24.5 24.5 5.8 38.3 8.2 40.7 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.31 0.31 0.07 0.48 0.10 0.51 Clearance Time (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 5.0 4.0 5.0 Vehicle Extension (s) 5.0 5.0 4.0 5.0 4.0 5.0 Lane Grp Cap (vph) 485 366 128 1657 181 1798 v/s Ratio Prot 0.04 c0.45 0.06 c0.35 v/s Ratio Perm 0.09 c0.28 v/c Ratio 0.31 0.92 0.58 0.94 0.61 0.68 Uniform Delay, d1 21.3 26.8 35.9 19.8 34.4 14.8 Progression Factor 0.99 1.00 0.60 0.37 1.28 0.82 Incremental Delay, d2 0.8 28.0 5.1 8.8 5.3 1.7 Delay (s) 21.7 54.8 26.8 16.1 49.3 13.8 Level of Service C D C B D B Approach Delay (s) 21.7 54.8 16.5 16.7 Approach LOS C D B B Intersection Summary HCM Average Control Delay 20.6 HCM Level of Service C HCM Volume to Capacity ratio 0.91 Actuated Cycle Length (s) 80.0 Sum of lost time (s) 9.0 Intersection Capacity Utilization 81.4% ICU Level of Service D Analysis Period (min) 15 c Critical Lane Group HCM Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 5: NE Sunset Blvd & Kirkland Ave NE 10/16/2010 Alternative 3 PM (2030)Synchro 7 - Report Sunset Area Planned EIS Page 5 Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations Volume (veh/h) 75 1286 8 0 988 4 0 0 36 0 0 99 Sign Control Free Free Stop Stop Grade 0% 0% 0% 0% Peak Hour Factor 0.79 0.90 0.50 0.50 0.90 0.25 0.75 0.25 0.33 0.90 0.25 0.63 Hourly flow rate (vph) 95 1429 16 0 1098 16 0 0 109 0 0 157 Pedestrians Lane Width (ft) Walking Speed (ft/s) Percent Blockage Right turn flare (veh) Median type None None Median storage veh) Upstream signal (ft) 1086 344 pX, platoon unblocked 0.72 0.65 0.79 0.79 0.65 0.79 0.79 0.72 vC, conflicting volume 1114 1445 2333 2741 722 2119 2741 557 vC1, stage 1 conf vol vC2, stage 2 conf vol vCu, unblocked vol 394 602 572 1091 0 301 1091 0 tC, single (s) 4.1 4.1 7.5 6.5 6.9 7.5 6.5 6.9 tC, 2 stage (s) tF (s) 2.2 2.2 3.5 4.0 3.3 3.5 4.0 3.3 p0 queue free % 89 100 100 100 84 100 100 80 cM capacity (veh/h) 840 630 231 149 703 382 149 785 Direction, Lane # EB 1 EB 2 EB 3 WB 1 WB 2 NB 1 SB 1 Volume Total 95 953 492 732 382 109 157 Volume Left 95 000000 Volume Right 0 0 16 0 16 109 157 cSH 840 1700 1700 1700 1700 703 785 Volume to Capacity 0.11 0.56 0.29 0.43 0.22 0.16 0.20 Queue Length 95th (ft) 10 00001419 Control Delay (s) 9.8 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 11.1 10.7 Lane LOS A B B Approach Delay (s) 0.6 0.0 11.1 10.7 Approach LOS B B Intersection Summary Average Delay 1.3 Intersection Capacity Utilization 45.8% ICU Level of Service A Analysis Period (min) 15 HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 6: NE 12th St & NE Sunset Blvd 10/16/2010 Alternative 3 PM (2030)Synchro 7 - Report Sunset Area Planned EIS Page 6 Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations Volume (vph) 214 185 13 102 98 57 37 1153 132 100 877 165 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Lane Width 12 11 12 12 11 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 Total Lost time (s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 Lane Util. Factor 0.95 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 Frt 0.99 0.96 1.00 0.98 1.00 0.97 Flt Protected 0.98 0.98 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 Satd. Flow (prot) 3318 3222 1770 3480 1770 3448 Flt Permitted 0.98 0.98 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 Satd. Flow (perm) 3318 3222 1770 3480 1770 3448 Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.92 0.82 0.63 0.77 0.84 0.63 0.78 0.94 0.86 0.76 0.91 0.82 Adj. Flow (vph) 233 226 21 132 117 90 47 1227 153 132 964 201 RTOR Reduction (vph)040048001100190 Lane Group Flow (vph) 0 476 0 0 291 0 47 1369 0 132 1146 0 Turn Type Split Split Prot Prot Protected Phases 4 4 3 3 1 6 5 2 Permitted Phases Actuated Green, G (s) 15.8 12.2 4.0 27.4 7.6 31.0 Effective Green, g (s) 16.8 13.2 5.0 29.4 8.6 33.0 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.21 0.16 0.06 0.37 0.11 0.41 Clearance Time (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 5.0 4.0 5.0 Vehicle Extension (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 Lane Grp Cap (vph) 697 532 111 1279 190 1422 v/s Ratio Prot c0.14 c0.09 0.03 c0.39 0.07 c0.33 v/s Ratio Perm v/c Ratio 0.68 0.55 0.42 1.07 0.69 0.81 Uniform Delay, d1 29.1 30.7 36.1 25.3 34.4 20.7 Progression Factor 1.00 1.00 1.18 0.47 1.00 1.00 Incremental Delay, d2 3.0 1.4 2.1 41.1 11.3 5.0 Delay (s) 32.2 32.1 44.6 53.0 45.7 25.6 Level of Service C C D D D C Approach Delay (s) 32.2 32.1 52.7 27.7 Approach LOS CCDC Intersection Summary HCM Average Control Delay 38.8 HCM Level of Service D HCM Volume to Capacity ratio 0.83 Actuated Cycle Length (s) 80.0 Sum of lost time (s) 9.0 Intersection Capacity Utilization 74.3% ICU Level of Service D Analysis Period (min) 15 c Critical Lane Group HCM Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 7: NE Sunset Blvd & Monroe Ave NE 10/16/2010 Alternative 3 PM (2030)Synchro 7 - Report Sunset Area Planned EIS Page 7 Movement EBT EBR WBL WBT NBL NBR Lane Configurations Volume (veh/h) 1407 16 4 1142 0 20 Sign Control Free Free Stop Grade 0% 0% 0% Peak Hour Factor 0.90 0.50 0.25 0.90 0.90 0.63 Hourly flow rate (vph) 1563 32 16 1269 0 32 Pedestrians Lane Width (ft) Walking Speed (ft/s) Percent Blockage Right turn flare (veh) 2 Median type None None Median storage veh) Upstream signal (ft) 1166 pX, platoon unblocked 0.68 0.68 0.68 vC, conflicting volume 1595 2246 798 vC1, stage 1 conf vol vC2, stage 2 conf vol vCu, unblocked vol 947 1898 0 tC, single (s) 4.1 6.8 6.9 tC, 2 stage (s) tF (s) 2.2 3.5 3.3 p0 queue free % 97 100 96 cM capacity (veh/h) 493 40 742 Direction, Lane # EB 1 EB 2 WB 1 WB 2 WB 3 NB 1 Volume Total 1042 553 16 634 634 32 Volume Left 0 0 16 0 0 0 Volume Right 0 32 0 0 0 32 cSH 1700 1700 493 1700 1700 371 Volume to Capacity 0.61 0.33 0.03 0.37 0.37 0.09 Queue Length 95th (ft)003007 Control Delay (s) 0.0 0.0 12.5 0.0 0.0 15.6 Lane LOS B C Approach Delay (s) 0.0 0.2 15.6 Approach LOS C Intersection Summary Average Delay 0.2 Intersection Capacity Utilization 49.4% ICU Level of Service A Analysis Period (min) 15 HCM Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 8: NE 12th St & Edmonds AV NE 10/16/2010 Alternative 3 PM (2030)Synchro 7 - Report Sunset Area Planned EIS Page 8 Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations Sign Control Stop Stop Stop Stop Volume (vph) 4 51 7 50 61 274 16 175 65 429 136 9 Peak Hour Factor 0.82 0.82 0.82 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.91 0.91 0.91 Hourly flow rate (vph) 5 62 9 54 66 295 17 186 69 471 149 10 Direction, Lane # EB 1 WB 1 NB 1 NB 2 SB 1 Volume Total (vph) 76 414 203 69 631 Volume Left (vph) 5 54 17 0 471 Volume Right (vph) 9 295 0 69 10 Hadj (s) -0.05 -0.40 0.04 -0.70 0.14 Departure Headway (s) 7.6 6.2 7.2 6.5 6.4 Degree Utilization, x 0.16 0.72 0.41 0.12 1.12 Capacity (veh/h) 421 564 467 524 554 Control Delay (s) 12.0 23.3 14.0 9.2 99.6 Approach Delay (s) 12.0 23.3 12.8 99.6 Approach LOS B C B F Intersection Summary Delay 55.2 HCM Level of Service F Intersection Capacity Utilization 81.1% ICU Level of Service D Analysis Period (min) 15 HCM Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 9: NE 12th St & Harrington AV NE 10/16/2010 Alternative 3 PM (2030)Synchro 7 - Report Sunset Area Planned EIS Page 9 Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations Sign Control Stop Stop Stop Stop Volume (vph) 40 352 12 20 340 79 20 20 16 55 20 4 Peak Hour Factor 0.63 0.74 0.38 0.63 0.80 1.00 0.63 0.42 0.33 0.39 0.42 0.25 Hourly flow rate (vph) 63 476 32 32 425 79 32 48 48 141 48 16 Direction, Lane # EB 1 WB 1 NB 1 SB 1 Volume Total (vph) 571 536 128 205 Volume Left (vph) 63 32 32 141 Volume Right (vph) 32 79 48 16 Hadj (s) 0.02 -0.04 -0.14 0.12 Departure Headway (s) 6.4 6.3 7.9 7.7 Degree Utilization, x 1.02 0.94 0.28 0.44 Capacity (veh/h) 546 554 433 445 Control Delay (s) 68.9 50.3 13.9 16.7 Approach Delay (s) 68.9 50.3 13.9 16.7 Approach LOS F F B C Intersection Summary Delay 49.7 HCM Level of Service E Intersection Capacity Utilization 48.9% ICU Level of Service A Analysis Period (min) 15 HCM Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 10: NE 12th St & Kirkland Ave NE 10/16/2010 Alternative 3 PM (2030)Synchro 7 - Report Sunset Area Planned EIS Page 10 Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations Sign Control Stop Stop Stop Stop Volume (vph) 20 360 12 8 265 40 24 51 4 79 40 16 Peak Hour Factor 0.42 0.87 0.33 0.50 0.87 0.50 0.58 0.65 0.25 0.71 0.42 0.50 Hourly flow rate (vph) 48 414 36 16 305 80 41 78 16 111 95 32 Direction, Lane # EB 1 EB 2 WB 1 WB 2 NB 1 SB 1 Volume Total (vph) 255 243 168 232 136 239 Volume Left (vph) 48 0 16 0 41 111 Volume Right (vph) 0 36 0 80 16 32 Hadj (s) 0.13 -0.07 0.08 -0.21 0.02 0.05 Departure Headway (s) 6.6 6.4 6.7 6.4 6.8 6.5 Degree Utilization, x 0.47 0.43 0.31 0.41 0.26 0.43 Capacity (veh/h) 523 541 510 535 469 512 Control Delay (s) 14.1 13.0 11.5 12.7 12.1 14.4 Approach Delay (s) 13.5 12.2 12.1 14.4 Approach LOS B B B B Intersection Summary Delay 13.1 HCM Level of Service B Intersection Capacity Utilization 43.4% ICU Level of Service A Analysis Period (min) 15 Appendix G Parks and Recreation Level of Service Calculations   Appendix G ‐ Parks and Recreation Level of Service CalculationsLOS StandardsHighlands Park LOSExisting: 10.4 acresPark LOS Recreation Facilities LOSType: Community ParkNeighborhood Park Baseball/softball fieldsOutside0.5 mile study area 1 field/2,250 personsStudy Area inside Study Area,1.2 acres/1,000 personsService Area inside Football/soccer fieldsService Community Park1 field/3,000 personsArea1‐2 mile study area (1 mile used for report)2.5 acres/1,000 personsTennis Courts1 court/2,500 personsAlternative Population*Dwellings JobsExisting**29781289 1306Walking/hiking trailsAlternative 164172778 2220 .2 miles/1,000 personsAlternative 268082947 3471Alternative 387683796 4636Swimming pools (not evaluated in report) Study area 11,675,946*Basis for LOS analysis. ** Jobs 2006 TAZ data; Other 2010 data 1 pool/40,000 persons Study area clip (blue area) 11,675,946Percent area 100%Service area population outside study areaTotal service area populationNorth Highlands Park LOS2010 population 2978 2006 population 16664 19642Existing: 2.64 acresAlt 1 population 6417 Alt 1 population 24885 31302Type: Neighborhood ParkAlt 2 population 6808 Alt 2 population 24837 31645Alt 3 population 8768 Alt 3 population 25254 34022Study Area inside Outside Study area,Service Area inside Service Area LOS in Study Area LOS in Service AreaLOS Suplus/Deficiency LOS Surplus/DeficiencyLOS 2010 7.45 2.96 49.11‐38.71LOS Alt 1 16.04‐5.64 78.26‐67.86LOS Alt 2 17.02‐6.62 79.11‐68.71LOS Alt 3 21.92‐11.52 85.06‐74.66Sunset Court Park LOSExisting: 0.5 acresType: Neighborhood ParkStudy area 11,675,946Study area clip 8,328,915 (blue area)Study Area inside Service Area Outside Study Area, inside Service AreaServiceareaPlanned Action Study Area TotalPercent area 71%Service area population outside study areaTotal service area population2010 population 2124 2006 population 2369 4493Alt 1 population 4578 Alt 1 population 3381 7959Alt 2 population 4856 Alt 2 population 3275 8131Alt 3 population 6255 Alt 3 population 3574 9829LOS in Study Area LOS in Service AreaLOSSuplus / Deficiency LOSSurplus / DeficiencyLOS 2010 2.55 0.09 5.39‐2.75LOS Alt 1 5.49‐2.85 9.55‐6.91LOS Alt 2 5.83‐3.19 9.76‐7.12 Study area 11,675,946LOS Alt 3 7.51‐4.87 11.79‐9.15 Study area clip (blue area) 11,086,172Percent area 95%Service area population outside study areaTotal service area populationRecreation Facilities LOS2010 population 2828 2006 population 2801 5629Count (w/schools)Count (w/o schools) Existing LOS Alt 1 LOS Alt 2 LOS Alt 3 LOS Alt 1 population 6093 Alt 1 population 4210 10303Baseball/softball fields 6 1 1.32 2.85 3.03 3.90 Alt 2 population 6464 Alt 2 population 4215 10679Football/soccer fields 4 1 0.99 2.14 2.27 2.92 Alt 3 population 8325 Alt 3 population 4512 12837Tennis courts 6 3 1.19 2.57 2.72 3.51Walking/hiking trails 0.35 0.35 0.60 1.28 1.36 1.75LOS in Study Area LOS in Service AreaLOS Suplus/Deficiency LOS Surplus/DeficiencyWith Schools Without Schools LOS 2010 3.39‐2.89 6.75‐6.25Existing Deficiency/ SurplusAlt 1 Deficiency/SurplusAlt 2 Deficiency/ SurplusAlt 3 Deficiency/SurplusExisting Deficiency/ SurplusAlt 1 Deficiency/SurplusAlt 2 Deficiency/ SurplusAlt 3 Deficiency/Surplus LOS Alt 1 7.31‐6.81 12.36‐11.86Baseball/softball fields 4.68 3.15 2.97 2.10‐0.32‐1.85‐2.03‐2.90 LOS Alt 2 7.76‐7.26 12.81‐12.31Football/soccer fields 3.01 1.86 1.73 1.08 0.01‐1.14‐1.27‐1.92 LOS Alt 3 9.99‐9.49 15.40‐14.90Tennis courts 4.81 3.43 3.28 2.49 1.81 0.43 0.28‐0.51Walking/hiking trails‐0.25‐0.93‐1.01‐1.40‐0.25‐0.93‐1.01‐1.40   Appendix H Greenhouse Gas Calculations   City of Renton Sunset Planned ActionGHG Emission SummaryAlt 1 Alt 2 Alt 3 Alt 1 Alt 2 Alt 3Plannced Action AreaStudy Area 1,230,712 1,753,597 2,745,967 20,512 29,227 45,766Regional Growth Outside Study Area 1,765,176 1,138,640 0 29,420 18,977 0Total Emissions Increase for Study Area Plus Regional Growth2,995,888 2,892,237 2,745,967 49,931 48,204 45,766Net Emission Reduction (Alternatives Minus No Action)- 103,651 249,921 - 1,728 4,165Sunset Terrace SubareaSubarea 144,696 266,333 396,724 2,412 4,439 6,612Regional Growth Outside Subarea 280,020 144,877 0 4,667 2,415 0Total Emissions Increase for Subarea Plus Regional Growth424,717 411,210 396,724 7,079 6,854 6,612Net Emission Reduction (Alternatives Minus No Action)- 13,506 27,992 - 225 467GHG Emission Estimates60-Year Life Cycle GHG Emissions (metric tons CO2-equivalent)Average Annual GHG Emissions During 60-Year Project Lifetime (metric tons CO2-equivalent per year) City of Renton Sunset Planned ActionLand Use18% 10%Type (Residential) or Principal Activity (Commercial) # UnitsSquare Feet (in thousands of square feet) # UnitsSquare Feet (in thousands of square feet) # UnitsSquare Feet (in thousands of square feet) # UnitsSquare Feet (in thousands of square feet) # UnitsSquare Feet (in thousands of square feet) # UnitsSquare Feet (in thousands of square feet)Single-Family Home..................................... 11 11 0 0 0 0Multi-Family Unit in Large Building (≥ 5).......1446 168 1,107 171 723 304Multi-Family Unit in Small Building (1-4)...... 33 29 0 4 295 0Mobile Home............................................... 0 0 0 0 0Education ................................................... 30.6 30.6 0.0 0 26.4 0Food Sales ................................................. 0 0 0 0 0Food Service .............................................. 0 0 0 0 0Health Care Inpatient .................................. 0 0 0 0 0Health Care Outpatient ............................... 0 0 0 0 0Lodging ...................................................... 0 0 0 0 0Retail (Other Than Mall)............................... 90.7 0.0 90.7 0385.6 31.5Office .......................................................... 0 0 0 0 0Public Assembly ......................................... 0 0 0 0 0Public Order and Safety .............................. 0 0 0 0 0Religious Worship ....................................... 0 0 0 0 0Service .......................................................130.4 0.0 110.8 19.6 646.4 7.9Warehouse and Storage ............................. 0 0 0 0 0Other .......................................................... 0 0 0 0 0Vacant ........................................................ 0 0 0 0 0Population...................................................3,440                 913                    2,181                 345                    2,351 702 TOD MitigationSunset Mixed UseRest of Planned Action Sunset Mixed UseRest of Planned ActionSunset TerraceSunset Terrace2030 Alt 1 (No Action) Increase from Existing2030 Alt 2 Increase from ExistingRegional Growth Outside Planned ActionRegional Growth Outside Sunset TerraceRegional Growth Outside Planned ActionRegional Growth Outside Sunset TerraceTotal Planned ActionTotal Planned ActionType (Residential) or Principal Activity (Commercial) # UnitsSquare Feet (in thousands of square feet) # UnitsSquare Feet (in thousands of square feet) # UnitsSquare Feet (in thousands of square feet) # UnitsSquare Feet (in thousands of square feet) # UnitsSquare Feet (in thousands of square feet) # UnitsSquare Feet (in thousands of square feet)Single-Family Home..................................... 10 10 0 0 0 0Multi-Family Unit in Large Building (≥ 5).......1549 29 1,211 309 620 166Multi-Family Unit in Small Building (1-4)...... 99 98 0 1 228 3Mobile Home............................................... 0 0 0 0 0Education ................................................... 57.0 57.0 0.0 0.0 0 0Food Sales ................................................. 0 0 0.0 0 0Food Service .............................................. 0 0 0.0 0 0Health Care Inpatient .................................. 0 0 0.0 0 0Health Care Outpatient ............................... 0 0 0.0 0 0Lodging ...................................................... 0 0 0.0 0 0Retail (Other Than Mall)...............................300.2 0.0 286.7 13.5 176.1 18.0Office .......................................................... 0 0 0.0 0 0Public Assembly ......................................... 0 0 0.0 0 0Public Order and Safety .............................. 0 0 0.0 0 0Religious Worship ....................................... 0 0 0.0 0 0Service .......................................................487.1 0.0 448.6 38.5 289.7 -11.0Warehouse and Storage ............................. 0 0 0.0 0 0Other .......................................................... 0 0 0.0 0 0Vacant ........................................................ 0 0 0.0 0 03,830                 608                    2,565                 657                    1,960 390 Net population increase for the Sunset Terrace Subarea within this table uses the 2.31 persons per household rate assumed for the Planned Action Study Area and applies it to net increase in dwelling units within the Sunset Terrace Subarea. Although net increases and total amounts of dwelling units are consistent throughout, in some instances, a small variation in net population numbers within the Sunset Terrace Subarea occur since a higher person per household rate of 2.85was used to estimate existing conditions population within the Sunset Terrace Subarea only. The higher persons per household figure was used for existing conditions to account for existing demographic information within the Subarea. City of Renton Sunset Planned ActionLand UseType (Residential) or Principal Activity (Commercial) # UnitsSquare Feet (in thousands of square feet) # UnitsSquare Feet (in thousands of square feet) # UnitsSquare Feet (in thousands of square feet) # UnitsSquare Feet (in thousands of square feet) # UnitsSquare Feet (in thousands of square feet) # UnitsSquare Feet (in thousands of square feet)Single-Family Home..................................... 10 10 0 0 0 0Multi-Family Unit in Large Building (≥ 5).......2169 26 1,668 475 0 0Multi-Family Unit in Small Building (1-4)...... 327 323 0 4 0 0Mobile Home............................................... 0 0 0 0 0Education ................................................... 57.0 57.0 0.0 0.0 0 0Food Sales ................................................. 0 0 0.0 0 0Food Service .............................................. 0 0 0.0 0 0Health Care Inpatient .................................. 0 0 0.0 0 0Health Care Outpatient ............................... 0 0 0.0 0 0Lodging ...................................................... 0 0 0.0 0 0Retail (Other Than Mall)...............................476.3 0.0 444.8 31.5 0 0Office .......................................................... 0 0 0.0 0 0Public Assembly ......................................... 0 0 0.0 0 0Public Order and Safety .............................. 0 0 0.0 0 0Religious Worship ....................................... 0 0 0.0 0 0Service .......................................................776.8 0.0 749.3 27.5 0 0Warehouse and Storage ............................. 0 0 0.0 0 0Other .......................................................... 0 0 0.0 0 0Vacant ........................................................ 0 0 0.0 0 05,791                 1,097                 3,646                 1,047                 00Net population increase for the Sunset Terrace Subarea within this table uses the 2.31 persons per household rate assumed for the Planned Action Study Area and applies it to net increase in dwelling units within the Sunset Terrace Subarea. Although net increases and total amounts of dwelling units are consistent throughout, in some instances, a small variation in net population numbers within the Sunset Terrace Subarea occur since a higher person per household rate of 2.85was used to estimate existing conditions population within the Sunset Terrace Subarea only. The higher persons per household figure was used for existing conditions to account for existing demographic information within the Subarea. Sunset TerracePlanned Action2030 Alt 3Total Planned Action Sunset Mixed Use Sunset TerraceExisting Land useSunset TerracePlanned ActionSunset TerracePlanned ActionPlanned Action Sunset TerraceRegional Growth Outside Planned Action2030 Alt 1 (No Action) 2030 Alt 2Regional Growth Outside Sunset TerraceRest of Planned Action2030 Alt 3 Increase from ExistingType (Residential) or Principal Activity (Commercial) # UnitsSquare Feet (in thousands of square feet) # UnitsSquare Feet (in thousands of square feet) # UnitsSquare Feet (in thousands of square feet) # UnitsSquare Feet (in thousands of square feet) # UnitsSquare Feet (in thousands of square feet) # UnitsSquare Feet (in thousands of square feet) # UnitsSquare Feet (in thousands of square feet) # UnitsSquare Feet (in thousands of square feet)Single-Family Home..................................... 117 0 128 0 127 0 127 0Multi-Family Unit in Large Building (≥ 5)....... 783 100 2,229 271 2,332 409 2,952 575Multi-Family Unit in Small Building (1-4)...... 389 10 422 14 488 11 716 14Mobile Home............................................... 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0Education ...................................................223.6 0.0 254.2 0.0 280.6 0.0 280.6 0.0Food Sales ................................................. 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0Food Service .............................................. 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0Health Care Inpatient .................................. 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0Health Care Outpatient ............................... 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0Lodging ...................................................... 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0Retail (Other Than Mall)...............................352.3 0.0 443.0 0.0 652.5 13.5 828.6 31.5Office .......................................................... 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0Public Assembly ......................................... 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0Public Order and Safety .............................. 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0Religious Worship ....................................... 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0Service .......................................................226.3 0.0 356.7 19.6 713.4 38.5 1,003.1 27.5Warehouse and Storage ............................. 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0Other .......................................................... 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0Vacant ........................................................ 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0Population...................................................6,808                                     970                                    8,768                                 1,361                                 2,978                                 314                                     6,417                                 658                                    TOD Mitigation Levels for Sunset Mixed Use AreaCity of Renton Sunset Planned ActionSacramento AQMD, "Recommended Guidance for Land Use Emission Reductions", August 2007Mitigation Number DescriptionMaximum Achievable ReductionConsiderations for Assigning Mitigation Values for Proposed ActionAssigned Mitigation4 Bicycle paths within 1/2 mile, with connection to bike paths1% The Proposed Action will incorporate pedestrian and bicycle paths in the development. 1%7 Bus shelters at transit stops 1% This is a California-style mitigation. In reality, most commuters in Washington expect bus kiosks.0%15 High mixed use density close to transit 2% Future bus transit with frequency headway.2%16 Project is focused on existing transit, bicycle and pedestrian corridor.1% The Proposed Action is focused on street frontage and pedestrian access.1%18 Residential density 12% The Proposed Action is focused on high density Multi-Family development.10%19 Street Grid. Multiple and direct street routing using grid system1% Presumably the Proposed Action will use pedestrian-friendly street layout. 1%23 Suburban Mixed Use. Mix of residential, office, park, open space, and office within 1/4 mile3% The Proposed Action will incorporate mixed use. 3%33 Transportation Management Association membership5% No indication that a TMA is proposed. 0%18%Total Assigned MitigationG:\Seattle\PNWProjects\Renton, City of\00593_10_Sunset_Planned_Action_EIS\03_Reports-Analyses\Air\[Renton Sunset GHG & Energy_10-18-2010.xls]Energy TOD Mitigation Levels for Sunset Terrace SubareaCity of Renton Sunset Planned ActionSacramento AQMD, "Recommended Guidance for Land Use Emission Reductions", August 2007Mitigation Number DescriptionMaximum Achievable ReductionConsiderations for Assigning Mitigation Values for Proposed ActionAssigned Mitigation4 Bicycle paths within 1/2 mile, with connection to bike paths1% The Proposed Action will incorporate pedestrian and bicycle paths in the development. 1%7 Bus shelters at transit stops 1% This is a California-style mitigation. In reality, most commuters in Washington expect bus kiosks.0%15 High mixed use density close to transit 2% Future bus transit with frequency headway.1%16 Project is focused on existing transit, bicycle and pedestrian corridor.1% The Proposed Action is focused on street frontage and pedestrian access.1%18 Residential density 12% The Proposed Action is focused on high density Multi-Family development.6%19 Street Grid. Multiple and direct street routing using grid system1% Presumably the Proposed Action will use pedestrian-friendly street layout. 1%23 Suburban Mixed Use. Mix of residential, office, park, open space, and office within 1/4 mile3% The Proposed Action will incorporate mixed use. 0%33 Transportation Management Association membership5% No indication that a TMA is proposed. 0%10%Total Assigned MitigationG:\Seattle\PNWProjects\Renton, City of\00593_10_Sunset_Planned_Action_EIS\03_Reports-Analyses\Air\[Renton Sunset GHG & Energy_10-18-2010.xls]Energy Alt 1 Regional GHG Emissions Outside Planned Action Area (City of Renton Sunset Planned Action)Section I: Buildings (Includes CAFÉ Adjustment)SMAQMD TOD Reduction0%Type (Residential) or Principal Activity (Commercial) # UnitsSquare Feet (in thousands of square feet) Embodied EnergyCAFÉ TransportationUn-Mitig BAU Lifespan Emissions (MTCO2e)Mitigated Lifespan Emissions (MTCO2e)Un-Mitig BAU Annualized (MTCO2e)Mitigated Annualized (MTCO2e)Single-Family Home............................. 0 98 672 4470000Multi-Family Unit in Large Building ...... 723 33 357 432594,586594,5867,3827,382Multi-Family Unit in Small Building ...... 295 54 681 432343,782343,7824,2684,268Mobile Home........................................ 0 41 475 4000000Education ............................................26 39 646 20423,45623,456375375Food Sales ..........................................0 39 1,541 1590000Food Service .......................................0 39 1,994 3160000Health Care Inpatient ...........................0 39 1,938 3280000Health Care Outpatient ........................0 39 737 3220000Lodging ...............................................0 39 777 660000Retail (Other Than Mall).......................386 39 577 139291,218291,2184,6564,656Office ...................................................0 39 723 3320000 Public Assembly ..................................0 39 733 850000Public Order and Safety ......................0 39 899 2110000Religious Worship ...............................0 39 339 730000Service ................................................646 39 599 150509,488509,4888,1468,146Warehouse and Storage ......................0 39 352 1020000Other ...................................................0 39 1,278 1450000Vacant .................................................0 39 162 2600001,058.4Section II: Pavement..........................Pavement............................................. 52.922,6462,6464444Total Project Emissions: 1,765,1761,765,17624,87124,871G:\Seattle\PNWProjects\Renton, City of\00593_10_Sunset_Planned_Action_EIS\03_Reports-Analyses\Air\[Renton Sunset GHG & Energy_10-18-2010.xls]EnergyEmissions Per Unit or Per Thousand Square Feet (MTCO2e)10/19/2010, 8:13 PM Alt 2 Regional GHG Emissions Outside Planned Action Area (City of Renton Sunset Planned Action)Section I: Buildings (Includes CAFÉ Adjustment)SMAQMD TOD Reduction0%Type (Residential) or Principal Activity (Commercial) # UnitsSquare Feet (in thousands of square feet) Embodied EnergyCAFÉ TransportationUn-Mitig BAU Lifespan Emissions (MTCO2e)Mitigated Lifespan Emissions (MTCO2e)Un-Mitig BAU Annualized (MTCO2e)Mitigated Annualized (MTCO2e)Single-Family Home............................. 0 98 672 4470000Multi-Family Unit in Large Building ...... 620 33 357 432510,082510,0826,3336,333Multi-Family Unit in Small Building ...... 228 54 681 432266,087266,0873,3033,303Mobile Home........................................ 0 41 475 4000000Education ............................................0 39 646 2040000Food Sales ..........................................0 39 1,541 1590000Food Service .......................................0 39 1,994 3160000Health Care Inpatient ...........................0 39 1,938 3280000Health Care Outpatient ........................0 39 737 3220000Lodging ...............................................0 39 777 660000Retail (Other Than Mall).......................176 39 577 139132,974132,9742,1262,126Office ...................................................0 39 723 3320000 Public Assembly ..................................0 39 733 850000Public Order and Safety ......................0 39 899 2110000Religious Worship ...............................0 39 339 730000Service ................................................290 39 599 150228,333228,3333,6513,651Warehouse and Storage ......................0 39 352 1020000Other ...................................................0 39 1,278 1450000Vacant .................................................0 39 162 260000465.8Section II: Pavement..........................Pavement............................................. 23.291,1641,1641919Total Project Emissions: 1,138,6401,138,64015,43215,432G:\Seattle\PNWProjects\Renton, City of\00593_10_Sunset_Planned_Action_EIS\03_Reports-Analyses\Air\[Renton Sunset GHG & Energy_10-18-2010.xls]EnergyEmissions Per Unit or Per Thousand Square Feet (MTCO2e)10/19/2010, 8:13 PM Alt 3 Regional GHG Emissions Outside Planned Action Area (City of Renton Sunset Planned Action)Section I: Buildings (Includes CAFÉ Adjustment)SMAQMD TOD Reduction0%Type (Residential) or Principal Activity (Commercial) # UnitsSquare Feet (in thousands of square feet) Embodied EnergyCAFÉ TransportationUn-Mitig BAU Lifespan Emissions (MTCO2e)Mitigated Lifespan Emissions (MTCO2e)Un-Mitig BAU Annualized (MTCO2e)Mitigated Annualized (MTCO2e)Single-Family Home............................. 0 98 672 4470000Multi-Family Unit in Large Building ...... 0 33 357 4320000Multi-Family Unit in Small Building ...... 0 54 681 4320000Mobile Home........................................ 0 41 475 4000000Education ............................................0 39 646 2040000Food Sales ..........................................0 39 1,541 1590000Food Service .......................................0 39 1,994 3160000Health Care Inpatient ...........................0 39 1,938 3280000Health Care Outpatient ........................0 39 737 3220000Lodging ...............................................0 39 777 660000Retail (Other Than Mall).......................0 39 577 1390000Office ...................................................0 39 723 3320000 Public Assembly ..................................0 39 733 850000Public Order and Safety ......................0 39 899 2110000Religious Worship ...............................0 39 339 730000Service ................................................0 39 599 1500000Warehouse and Storage ......................0 39 352 1020000Other ...................................................0 39 1,278 1450000Vacant .................................................0 39 162 2600000.0Section II: Pavement..........................Pavement............................................. 0.000000Total Project Emissions: 0000G:\Seattle\PNWProjects\Renton, City of\00593_10_Sunset_Planned_Action_EIS\03_Reports-Analyses\Air\[Renton Sunset GHG & Energy_10-18-2010.xls]EnergyEmissions Per Unit or Per Thousand Square Feet (MTCO2e)10/19/2010, 8:13 PM Alt 1 Rest of Planned Action Area GHG Emissions (City of Renton Sunset Planned Action)Section I: Buildings (Includes CAFÉ Adjustment)SMAQMD TOD Reduction0%Type (Residential) or Principal Activity (Commercial) # UnitsSquare Feet (in thousands of square feet) Embodied EnergyCAFÉ TransportationUn-Mitig BAU Lifespan Emissions (MTCO2e)Mitigated Lifespan Emissions (MTCO2e)Un-Mitig BAU Annualized (MTCO2e)Mitigated Annualized (MTCO2e)Single-Family Home............................. 11 98 672 44712,84012,840222222Multi-Family Unit in Large Building ...... 168 33 357 432137,892137,8921,7121,712Multi-Family Unit in Small Building ...... 29 54 681 43233,48733,487416416Mobile Home........................................ 0 41 475 4000000Education ............................................31 39 646 20427,17327,173434434Food Sales ..........................................0 39 1,541 1590000Food Service .......................................0 39 1,994 3160000Health Care Inpatient ...........................0 39 1,938 3280000Health Care Outpatient ........................0 39 737 3220000Lodging ...............................................0 39 777 660000Retail (Other Than Mall).......................0 39 577 1390000Office ...................................................0 39 723 3320000 Public Assembly ..................................0 39 733 850000Public Order and Safety ......................0 39 899 2110000Religious Worship ...............................0 39 339 730000Service ................................................0 39 599 1500000Warehouse and Storage ......................0 39 352 1020000Other ...................................................0 39 1,278 1450000Vacant .................................................0 39 162 26000030.6Section II: Pavement..........................Pavement............................................. 1.53767611Total Project Emissions: 211,469211,4692,7852,785G:\Seattle\PNWProjects\Renton, City of\00593_10_Sunset_Planned_Action_EIS\03_Reports-Analyses\Air\[Renton Sunset GHG & Energy_10-18-2010.xls]EnergyEmissions Per Unit or Per Thousand Square Feet (MTCO2e)10/19/2010, 8:13 PM Alt 2 Rest of Planned Action Area GHG Emissions (City of Renton Sunset Planned Action)Section I: Buildings (Includes CAFÉ Adjustment)SMAQMD TOD Reduction0%Type (Residential) or Principal Activity (Commercial) # UnitsSquare Feet (in thousands of square feet) Embodied EnergyCAFÉ TransportationUn-Mitig BAU Lifespan Emissions (MTCO2e)Mitigated Lifespan Emissions (MTCO2e)Un-Mitig BAU Annualized (MTCO2e)Mitigated Annualized (MTCO2e)Single-Family Home............................. 10 98 672 44712,65812,658219219Multi-Family Unit in Large Building ...... 29 33 357 43223,44223,442291291Multi-Family Unit in Small Building ...... 98 54 681 432114,682114,6821,4241,424Mobile Home........................................ 0 41 475 4000000Education ............................................57 39 646 20450,63050,630809809Food Sales ..........................................0 39 1,541 1590000Food Service .......................................0 39 1,994 3160000Health Care Inpatient ...........................0 39 1,938 3280000Health Care Outpatient ........................0 39 737 3220000Lodging ...............................................0 39 777 660000Retail (Other Than Mall).......................0 39 577 1390000Office ...................................................0 39 723 3320000 Public Assembly ..................................0 39 733 850000Public Order and Safety ......................0 39 899 2110000Religious Worship ...............................0 39 339 730000Service ................................................0 39 599 1500000Warehouse and Storage ......................0 39 352 1020000Other ...................................................0 39 1,278 1450000Vacant .................................................0 39 162 26000057.0Section II: Pavement..........................Pavement............................................. 2.8514314322Total Project Emissions: 201,554201,5542,7452,745G:\Seattle\PNWProjects\Renton, City of\00593_10_Sunset_Planned_Action_EIS\03_Reports-Analyses\Air\[Renton Sunset GHG & Energy_10-18-2010.xls]EnergyEmissions Per Unit or Per Thousand Square Feet (MTCO2e)10/19/2010, 8:13 PM Alt 3 Rest of Planned Action Area GHG Emissions (City of Renton Sunset Planned Action)Section I: Buildings (Includes CAFÉ Adjustment)SMAQMD TOD Reduction0%Type (Residential) or Principal Activity (Commercial) # UnitsSquare Feet (in thousands of square feet) Embodied EnergyCAFÉ TransportationUn-Mitig BAU Lifespan Emissions (MTCO2e)Mitigated Lifespan Emissions (MTCO2e)Un-Mitig BAU Annualized (MTCO2e)Mitigated Annualized (MTCO2e)Single-Family Home............................. 10 98 672 44712,65812,658219219Multi-Family Unit in Large Building ...... 26 33 357 43221,33921,339265265Multi-Family Unit in Small Building ...... 323 54 681 432377,269377,2694,6844,684Mobile Home........................................ 0 41 475 4000000Education ............................................57 39 646 20450,63050,630809809Food Sales ..........................................0 39 1,541 1590000Food Service .......................................0 39 1,994 3160000Health Care Inpatient ...........................0 39 1,938 3280000Health Care Outpatient ........................0 39 737 3220000Lodging ...............................................0 39 777 660000Retail (Other Than Mall).......................0 39 577 1390000Office ...................................................0 39 723 3320000 Public Assembly ..................................0 39 733 850000Public Order and Safety ......................0 39 899 2110000Religious Worship ...............................0 39 339 730000Service ................................................0 39 599 1500000Warehouse and Storage ......................0 39 352 1020000Other ...................................................0 39 1,278 1450000Vacant .................................................0 39 162 26000057.0Section II: Pavement..........................Pavement............................................. 2.8514314322Total Project Emissions: 462,039462,0395,9795,979G:\Seattle\PNWProjects\Renton, City of\00593_10_Sunset_Planned_Action_EIS\03_Reports-Analyses\Air\[Renton Sunset GHG & Energy_10-18-2010.xls]EnergyEmissions Per Unit or Per Thousand Square Feet (MTCO2e)10/19/2010, 8:13 PM Alt 1 Sunset Mixed Use Area GHG Emissions (City of Renton Sunset Planned Action)Section I: Buildings (Includes CAFÉ Adjustment)SMAQMD TOD Reduction18%Type (Residential) or Principal Activity (Commercial) # UnitsSquare Feet (in thousands of square feet) Embodied EnergyCAFÉ TransportationUn-Mitig BAU Lifespan Emissions (MTCO2e)Mitigated Lifespan Emissions (MTCO2e)Un-Mitig BAU Annualized (MTCO2e)Mitigated Annualized (MTCO2e)Single-Family Home............................. 0 98 672 4470000Multi-Family Unit in Large Building ...... 1107 33 357 432910,093746,27611,2999,265Multi-Family Unit in Small Building ...... 0 54 681 4320000Mobile Home........................................ 0 41 475 4000000Education ............................................0 39 646 2040000Food Sales ..........................................0 39 1,541 1590000Food Service .......................................0 39 1,994 3160000Health Care Inpatient ...........................0 39 1,938 3280000Health Care Outpatient ........................0 39 737 3220000Lodging ...............................................0 39 777 660000Retail (Other Than Mall).......................91 39 577 13968,49656,1671,095898Office ...................................................0 39 723 3320000 Public Assembly ..................................0 39 733 850000Public Order and Safety ......................0 39 899 2110000Religious Worship ...............................0 39 339 730000Service ................................................111 39 599 15087,31771,6001,3961,145Warehouse and Storage ......................0 39 352 1020000Other ...................................................0 39 1,278 1450000Vacant .................................................0 39 162 260000201.5Section II: Pavement..........................Pavement............................................. 10.0750450488Total Project Emissions: 1,066,409874,54613,79811,316G:\Seattle\PNWProjects\Renton, City of\00593_10_Sunset_Planned_Action_EIS\03_Reports-Analyses\Air\[Renton Sunset GHG & Energy_10-18-2010.xls]EnergyEmissions Per Unit or Per Thousand Square Feet (MTCO2e)10/19/2010, 8:13 PM Alt 2 Sunset Mixed Use Area GHG Emissions (City of Renton Sunset Planned Action)Section I: Buildings (Includes CAFÉ Adjustment)SMAQMD TOD Reduction18%Type (Residential) or Principal Activity (Commercial) # UnitsSquare Feet (in thousands of square feet) Embodied EnergyCAFÉ TransportationUn-Mitig BAU Lifespan Emissions (MTCO2e)Mitigated Lifespan Emissions (MTCO2e)Un-Mitig BAU Annualized (MTCO2e)Mitigated Annualized (MTCO2e)Single-Family Home............................. 0 98 672 4470000Multi-Family Unit in Large Building ...... 1211 33 357 432995,594816,38712,36010,136Multi-Family Unit in Small Building ...... 0 54 681 4320000Mobile Home........................................ 0 41 475 4000000Education ............................................0 39 646 2040000Food Sales ..........................................0 39 1,541 1590000Food Service .......................................0 39 1,994 3160000Health Care Inpatient ...........................0 39 1,938 3280000Health Care Outpatient ........................0 39 737 3220000Lodging ...............................................0 39 777 660000Retail (Other Than Mall).......................287 39 577 139216,544177,5663,4622,839Office ...................................................0 39 723 3320000 Public Assembly ..................................0 39 733 850000Public Order and Safety ......................0 39 899 2110000Religious Worship ...............................0 39 339 730000Service ................................................449 39 599 150353,559289,9185,6534,635Warehouse and Storage ......................0 39 352 1020000Other ...................................................0 39 1,278 1450000Vacant .................................................0 39 162 260000735.3Section II: Pavement..........................Pavement............................................. 36.761,8381,8383131Total Project Emissions: 1,567,5351,285,70921,50617,640G:\Seattle\PNWProjects\Renton, City of\00593_10_Sunset_Planned_Action_EIS\03_Reports-Analyses\Air\[Renton Sunset GHG & Energy_10-18-2010.xls]EnergyEmissions Per Unit or Per Thousand Square Feet (MTCO2e)10/19/2010, 8:13 PM Alt 3 Sunset Mixed Use Area GHG Emissions (City of Renton Sunset Planned Action)Section I: Buildings (Includes CAFÉ Adjustment)SMAQMD TOD Reduction18%Type (Residential) or Principal Activity (Commercial) # UnitsSquare Feet (in thousands of square feet) Embodied EnergyCAFÉ TransportationUn-Mitig BAU Lifespan Emissions (MTCO2e)Mitigated Lifespan Emissions (MTCO2e)Un-Mitig BAU Annualized (MTCO2e)Mitigated Annualized (MTCO2e)Single-Family Home............................. 0 98 672 4470000Multi-Family Unit in Large Building ...... 1668 33 357 4321,371,3051,124,47017,02513,960Multi-Family Unit in Small Building ...... 0 54 681 4320000Mobile Home........................................ 0 41 475 4000000Education ............................................0 39 646 2040000Food Sales ..........................................0 39 1,541 1590000Food Service .......................................0 39 1,994 3160000Health Care Inpatient ...........................0 39 1,938 3280000Health Care Outpatient ........................0 39 737 3220000Lodging ...............................................0 39 777 660000Retail (Other Than Mall).......................445 39 577 139335,924275,4575,3714,404Office ...................................................0 39 723 3320000 Public Assembly ..................................0 39 733 850000Public Order and Safety ......................0 39 899 2110000Religious Worship ...............................0 39 339 730000Service ................................................749 39 599 150590,599484,2919,4437,743Warehouse and Storage ......................0 39 352 1020000Other ...................................................0 39 1,278 1450000Vacant .................................................0 39 162 2600001,194.1Section II: Pavement..........................Pavement............................................. 59.712,9852,9855050Total Project Emissions: 2,300,8131,887,20431,88826,157G:\Seattle\PNWProjects\Renton, City of\00593_10_Sunset_Planned_Action_EIS\03_Reports-Analyses\Air\[Renton Sunset GHG & Energy_10-18-2010.xls]EnergyEmissions Per Unit or Per Thousand Square Feet (MTCO2e)10/19/2010, 8:13 PM Alt 1 Sunset Terrace Subarea GHG Emissions (City of Renton Sunset Planned Action)Section I: Buildings (Includes CAFÉ Adjustment)SMAQMD TOD Reduction10%Type (Residential) or Principal Activity (Commercial) # UnitsSquare Feet (in thousands of square feet) Embodied EnergyCAFÉ TransportationUn-Mitig BAU Lifespan Emissions (MTCO2e)Mitigated Lifespan Emissions (MTCO2e)Un-Mitig BAU Annualized (MTCO2e)Mitigated Annualized (MTCO2e)Single-Family Home............................. 0 98 672 4470000Multi-Family Unit in Large Building ...... 171 33 357 432140,583126,5251,7451,571Multi-Family Unit in Small Building ...... 4 54 681 4324,6664,2005852Mobile Home........................................ 0 41 475 4000000Education ............................................0 39 646 2040000Food Sales ..........................................0 39 1,541 1590000Food Service .......................................0 39 1,994 3160000Health Care Inpatient ...........................0 39 1,938 3280000Health Care Outpatient ........................0 39 737 3220000Lodging ...............................................0 39 777 660000Retail (Other Than Mall).......................0 39 577 1390000Office ...................................................0 39 723 3320000 Public Assembly ..................................0 39 733 850000Public Order and Safety ......................0 39 899 2110000Religious Worship ...............................0 39 339 730000Service ................................................20 39 599 15015,46913,922247223Warehouse and Storage ......................0 39 352 1020000Other ...................................................0 39 1,278 1450000Vacant .................................................0 39 162 26000019.6Section II: Pavement..........................Pavement............................................. 0.98494911Total Project Emissions: 160,768144,6962,0511,846G:\Seattle\PNWProjects\Renton, City of\00593_10_Sunset_Planned_Action_EIS\03_Reports-Analyses\Air\[Renton Sunset GHG & Energy_10-18-2010.xls]EnergyEmissions Per Unit or Per Thousand Square Feet (MTCO2e)10/19/2010, 8:13 PM Alt 1 Regional GHG Emissions Outside Sunset Terrace Subarea (City of Renton Sunset Planned Action)Section I: Buildings (Includes CAFÉ Adjustment)SMAQMD TOD Reduction0%Type (Residential) or Principal Activity (Commercial) # UnitsSquare Feet (in thousands of square feet) Embodied EnergyCAFÉ TransportationUn-Mitig BAU Lifespan Emissions (MTCO2e)Mitigated Lifespan Emissions (MTCO2e)Un-Mitig BAU Annualized (MTCO2e)Mitigated Annualized (MTCO2e)Single-Family Home............................. 0 98 672 4470000Multi-Family Unit in Large Building ...... 304 33 357 432249,926249,9263,1033,103Multi-Family Unit in Small Building ...... 0 54 681 4320000Mobile Home........................................ 0 41 475 4000000Education ............................................0 39 646 2040000Food Sales ..........................................0 39 1,541 1590000Food Service .......................................0 39 1,994 3160000Health Care Inpatient ...........................0 39 1,938 3280000Health Care Outpatient ........................0 39 737 3220000Lodging ...............................................0 39 777 660000Retail (Other Than Mall).......................32 39 577 13923,79023,790380380Office ...................................................0 39 723 3320000 Public Assembly ..................................0 39 733 850000Public Order and Safety ......................0 39 899 2110000Religious Worship ...............................0 39 339 730000Service ................................................8 39 599 1506,2066,2069999Warehouse and Storage ......................0 39 352 1020000Other ...................................................0 39 1,278 1450000Vacant .................................................0 39 162 26000039.4Section II: Pavement..........................Pavement............................................. 1.97989822Total Project Emissions: 280,020280,0203,5843,584G:\Seattle\PNWProjects\Renton, City of\00593_10_Sunset_Planned_Action_EIS\03_Reports-Analyses\Air\[Renton Sunset GHG & Energy_10-18-2010.xls]EnergyEmissions Per Unit or Per Thousand Square Feet (MTCO2e)10/19/2010, 8:13 PM Alt 2 Regional GHG Emissions Outside Sunset Terrace Subarea (City of Renton Sunset Planned Action)Section I: Buildings (Includes CAFÉ Adjustment)SMAQMD TOD Reduction0%Type (Residential) or Principal Activity (Commercial) # UnitsSquare Feet (in thousands of square feet) Embodied EnergyCAFÉ TransportationUn-Mitig BAU Lifespan Emissions (MTCO2e)Mitigated Lifespan Emissions (MTCO2e)Un-Mitig BAU Annualized (MTCO2e)Mitigated Annualized (MTCO2e)Single-Family Home............................. 0 98 672 4470000Multi-Family Unit in Large Building ...... 166 33 357 432136,473136,4731,6941,694Multi-Family Unit in Small Building ...... 3 54 681 4323,5003,5004343Mobile Home........................................ 0 41 475 4000000Education ............................................0 39 646 2040000Food Sales ..........................................0 39 1,541 1590000Food Service .......................................0 39 1,994 3160000Health Care Inpatient ...........................0 39 1,938 3280000Health Care Outpatient ........................0 39 737 3220000Lodging ...............................................0 39 777 660000Retail (Other Than Mall).......................18 39 577 13913,59413,594217217Office ...................................................0 39 723 3320000 Public Assembly ..................................0 39 733 850000Public Order and Safety ......................0 39 899 2110000Religious Worship ...............................0 39 339 730000Service ................................................-11 39 599 150-8,707-8,707-139-139Warehouse and Storage ......................0 39 352 1020000Other ...................................................0 39 1,278 1450000Vacant .................................................0 39 162 2600007.0Section II: Pavement..........................Pavement............................................. 0.35171700Total Project Emissions: 144,877144,8771,8161,816G:\Seattle\PNWProjects\Renton, City of\00593_10_Sunset_Planned_Action_EIS\03_Reports-Analyses\Air\[Renton Sunset GHG & Energy_10-18-2010.xls]EnergyEmissions Per Unit or Per Thousand Square Feet (MTCO2e)10/19/2010, 8:13 PM Alt 3 Regional GHG Emissions Outside Sunset Terrace Subarea (City of Renton Sunset Planned Action)Section I: Buildings (Includes CAFÉ Adjustment)SMAQMD TOD Reduction0%Type (Residential) or Principal Activity (Commercial) # UnitsSquare Feet (in thousands of square feet) Embodied EnergyCAFÉ TransportationUn-Mitig BAU Lifespan Emissions (MTCO2e)Mitigated Lifespan Emissions (MTCO2e)Un-Mitig BAU Annualized (MTCO2e)Mitigated Annualized (MTCO2e)Single-Family Home............................. 0 98 672 4470000Multi-Family Unit in Large Building ...... 0 33 357 4320000Multi-Family Unit in Small Building ...... 0 54 681 4320000Mobile Home........................................ 0 41 475 4000000Education ............................................0 39 646 2040000Food Sales ..........................................0 39 1,541 1590000Food Service .......................................0 39 1,994 3160000Health Care Inpatient ...........................0 39 1,938 3280000Health Care Outpatient ........................0 39 737 3220000Lodging ...............................................0 39 777 660000Retail (Other Than Mall).......................0 39 577 1390000Office ...................................................0 39 723 3320000 Public Assembly ..................................0 39 733 850000Public Order and Safety ......................0 39 899 2110000Religious Worship ...............................0 39 339 730000Service ................................................0 39 599 1500000Warehouse and Storage ......................0 39 352 1020000Other ...................................................0 39 1,278 1450000Vacant .................................................0 39 162 2600000.0Section II: Pavement..........................Pavement............................................. 0.000000Total Project Emissions: 0000G:\Seattle\PNWProjects\Renton, City of\00593_10_Sunset_Planned_Action_EIS\03_Reports-Analyses\Air\[Renton Sunset GHG & Energy_10-18-2010.xls]EnergyEmissions Per Unit or Per Thousand Square Feet (MTCO2e)10/19/2010, 8:13 PM Alt 2 Sunset Terrace Subarea GHG Emissions (City of Renton Sunset Planned Action)Section I: Buildings (Includes CAFÉ Adjustment)SMAQMD TOD Reduction10%Type (Residential) or Principal Activity (Commercial) # UnitsSquare Feet (in thousands of square feet) Embodied EnergyCAFÉ TransportationUn-Mitig BAU Lifespan Emissions (MTCO2e)Mitigated Lifespan Emissions (MTCO2e)Un-Mitig BAU Annualized (MTCO2e)Mitigated Annualized (MTCO2e)Single-Family Home............................. 0 98 672 4470000Multi-Family Unit in Large Building ...... 309 33 357 432254,037228,6333,1542,839Multi-Family Unit in Small Building ...... 1 54 681 4321,1671,0501413Mobile Home........................................ 0 41 475 4000000Education ............................................0 39 646 2040000Food Sales ..........................................0 39 1,541 1590000Food Service .......................................0 39 1,994 3160000Health Care Inpatient ...........................0 39 1,938 3280000Health Care Outpatient ........................0 39 737 3220000Lodging ...............................................0 39 777 660000Retail (Other Than Mall).......................14 39 577 13910,1969,176163147Office ...................................................0 39 723 3320000 Public Assembly ..................................0 39 733 850000Public Order and Safety ......................0 39 899 2110000Religious Worship ...............................0 39 339 730000Service ................................................39 39 599 15030,38327,344486437Warehouse and Storage ......................0 39 352 1020000Other ...................................................0 39 1,278 1450000Vacant .................................................0 39 162 26000052.0Section II: Pavement..........................Pavement............................................. 2.6013013022Total Project Emissions: 295,912266,3333,8193,438G:\Seattle\PNWProjects\Renton, City of\00593_10_Sunset_Planned_Action_EIS\03_Reports-Analyses\Air\[Renton Sunset GHG & Energy_10-18-2010.xls]EnergyEmissions Per Unit or Per Thousand Square Feet (MTCO2e)10/19/2010, 8:13 PM Alt 3 Sunset Terrace Subarea GHG Emissions (City of Renton Sunset Planned Action)Section I: Buildings (Includes CAFÉ Adjustment)SMAQMD TOD Reduction10%Type (Residential) or Principal Activity (Commercial) # UnitsSquare Feet (in thousands of square feet) Embodied EnergyCAFÉ TransportationUn-Mitig BAU Lifespan Emissions (MTCO2e)Mitigated Lifespan Emissions (MTCO2e)Un-Mitig BAU Annualized (MTCO2e)Mitigated Annualized (MTCO2e)Single-Family Home............................. 0 98 672 4470000Multi-Family Unit in Large Building ...... 475 33 357 432390,510351,4594,8484,363Multi-Family Unit in Small Building ...... 4 54 681 4324,6664,2005852Mobile Home........................................ 0 41 475 4000000Education ............................................0 39 646 2040000Food Sales ..........................................0 39 1,541 1590000Food Service .......................................0 39 1,994 3160000Health Care Inpatient ...........................0 39 1,938 3280000Health Care Outpatient ........................0 39 737 3220000Lodging ...............................................0 39 777 660000Retail (Other Than Mall).......................32 39 577 13923,79021,411380342Office ...................................................0 39 723 3320000 Public Assembly ..................................0 39 733 850000Public Order and Safety ......................0 39 899 2110000Religious Worship ...............................0 39 339 730000Service ................................................28 39 599 15021,67519,508347312Warehouse and Storage ......................0 39 352 1020000Other ...................................................0 39 1,278 1450000Vacant .................................................0 39 162 26000059.0Section II: Pavement..........................Pavement............................................. 2.9514814822Total Project Emissions: 440,789396,7245,6365,072G:\Seattle\PNWProjects\Renton, City of\00593_10_Sunset_Planned_Action_EIS\03_Reports-Analyses\Air\[Renton Sunset GHG & Energy_10-18-2010.xls]EnergyEmissions Per Unit or Per Thousand Square Feet (MTCO2e)10/19/2010, 8:13 PM Appendix  I  Public Health in Land Use Planning & Community Design  Sunset Area Community Planned Action    NACCHO and the Tri-County Health Department in Colorado developed this checklist to assist local public health agencies (LPHAs) in their review of applications for new development or redevelopment plans in their communities. The checklist provides a method to ensure long term protection of public health and consistency in comments submitted for development plans, and broadens the health issues commented on by LPHAs during the planning process. It can also be used to identify potential health impacts and provide a screening process for improving the quality of decision-making. The checklist addresses not only those issues that LPHAs have regulatory authority over, but also the many public health issues that may arise during development and require policy change or other interventions. LPHAs can also incorporate issues that are specific to their jurisdictions. LPHAs should share the checklist with their local planning departments, elected officials, and the public, both to increase awareness of public health issues associated with land use planning and community design, and to encourage appropriate referral of applications to LPHAs for review and comment. 9 9 Checklist Water Quality What is the source of water for the project? A public system or individual well(s)? If public, does the agency have any regulatory responsibility for quality assurance? If private, are wellhead protection procedures proposed? Are the well(s) completed in an area of the aquifer that is free from identified or potential sources of contamination? In rural areas where gas or oil exploration is occurring, are domestic wells planned with ad- equate setbacks from gas or oil wells? Does the project adequately address stormwater? What is the drainage pattern on the site? Are there indications of drainage problems, such as erosion, steep topography, wetlands, boggy areas, etc.? Are there adjacent or nearby bodies of water (lakes, reservoirs, ditches, streams, etc.) that receive drainage from the site? If an erosion control plan has been provided, are effective erosion control methods proposed during construction? Post-construction? Does the plan include effective project-specific or regional stormwater quality measures? Both engineered and non-engineered? Does the proposed use warrant specific best management or pollution prevention practices? (e.g., proper use of pesticides on golf courses) Does the project include unnecessarily large expanses of paved areas? Is the property in a floodplain or a groundwater (aquifer) recharge area? Does the proposed use have the potential to release hazardous products or wastes into the surface or Public Health in Land Use Planning & Community Design groundwater? (e.g., AST/USTs; chemicals, including agricultural chemicals such as pesticides and herbicides; asbestos) For more information, visit: www.epa.gov/water/yearofcleanwater/docs/ growthwater.pdf http://ohioline.osu.edu/ws-fact/0003.html www.ire.ubc.ca/ecoresearch/publica3.html www.fhwa.dot.gov/environment/wtrshd96.htm www.cdc.gov/healthyplaces/about.htm Wastewater Is the proposed wastewater treatment system adequate and effective? Centralized service If new central service is proposed, does the proposed facility have an approved utility plan? If new central service is not proposed, is the proposed project within the service area of an existing munici- pal utility or wastewater treatment district, based on its approved utility plan? Does the existing or proposed service provider have the capacity to serve the development in compliance with regulatory requirements? Is the proposed system fiscally sound? Individual sewage disposal systems (ISDS) What type of systems do the soils warrant? Are there site features or areas that should be avoided as ISDS locations? What are appropriate setbacks? Should certain site uses be prohibited from discharg- ing into the ISDS? Are provisions in place to segregate and collect these discharges? For more information, visit: www.asu.edu/caed/proceedings01/HOOVER/hoover.htm Water Quantity Is there a sustainable water supply for the proposed use? Has the permitting agency (e.g., State Engineer’s Office) provided written confirmation that the applicant owns sufficient water rights for the proposed development? Does the landscaping plan include appropriate water conservation measures? Are there opportunities for recycling or reuse of water and wastewater generated by the project? For more information, visit: www.epa.gov/ost/stormwater/usw_a.pdf www.epa.gov/ordntrnt/ORD/WebPubs/runoff.pdf www.epa.gov/owow/nps/lidnatl.pdf www.epa.gov/livability/pdf/growthwater.pdf Air Quality From an air quality perspective, is the proposed use compatible with adjacent uses? Will the proposed use emit air pollutants? Does it require an emissions permit? Are fugitive dust emissions a potential problem? During construction? Post-construction? What mitigation measures should be taken? Will the project be served by paved roads? If not, is paving recommended? Does the proposed use generate odors? If the project will emit air pollutants or odors, what measures should be employed to eliminate or mitigate the emissions? As the project develops, will there be adequate transpor- tation infrastructure in place to absorb the volume of traffic generated by the project without degrading air quality? Is the project designed to reduce vehicle emissions? E.g. grid layout or non-circuitous street system, internal and external connectivity, mixed uses Is the project designed to offer and encourage the use of travel choices in addition to the automobile? E.g., Transit-friendly design, bike/pedestrian trails, etc. Is the project in close proximity to cell towers, power lines or other uses that emit potentially harmful electro- magnetic radiation? For more information, visit: www.epa.gov/otaq/transp/trancont/r01001.pdf www.fhwa.dot.gov/environment/air_abs.htm 9 9 9 9 Page 2 Public Health in Land Use Planning & Community Design Checklist Opportunities for Physical Fitness Are open spaces and trails included to provide regular opportunity for physical activit ies such as walking and biking? Are communities built with mixed-use commercial and residential purposes, and with sidewalks so that people can walk to movies, restaurants, and so on? Are schools built within communities so that young people can walk to school? Are sidewalks wide enough for mulitiple uses (e.g., bikes and walkers)? Is lighting placed along trails and sidewalks to increase the comfort level of those using them? Is there park space and equipment for children to play with? For more information, visit: www.surgeongeneral.gov/topics/obesity/ www.sprawlwatch.org/health.pdf www.nga.org/common/issueBriefDetailPrint/ 1,1434,2473,00.html www.vtpi.org/walkability.pdf Transportation and Injury Prevention If the proposed use involves significant truck traffic, does the site plan provide adequate room for truck turnarounds and safe truck access and egress, relative to neighboring developments? Does the proposed project include safe routes to school with a minimum of street crossings and high visibility for children walking to school? Does the proposed plan include pedestrian signals and mid-street islands on busy streets, and presence of bicycle lanes and trails? Does the project include traffic quieting road designs in both subdivisions and shopping districts? Does the project provide adequate neighborhood access to public transportation? Does the proposed project include ramps, depressed curbs or periodic breaks in curbs that act as ramps for people with disabilities? Does the proposed project include voice/audio or visual clues provided at crosswalks and transit stops? Does the project comply with ADA requirements for design of curb ramps, cross slopes and detectible warnings for new construction or retrofit projects? 9 9 9 9 9 Page 3 PUBLIC HEALTH IN LAND USE PLANNING & COMMUNITY DESIGN Public Health in Land Use Planning & Community Design Checklist 9 For more information, visit: www.transact.org/Reports/driven/ www-cta.ornl.gov/npts/1995/doc/NPTS_Booklet.pdf www.aaafoundation.org/resources/index.cfm? button=agdrtext www-nrd.nhtsa.dot.gov/pdf/nrd-30/NCSA/TSf2001/ 2001pedestrian.pdf Noise Is the proposed project compatible with neighboring uses from a noise perspective? Is the proposed project subject to nuisance noises from nearby uses such as airports, high volume roadways, industrial uses? Is the proposed project likely to generate noises that will create a nuisance to neighboring uses? Are there engineered or non-engineered measures that can be employed to mitigate nuisance noises, such as setbacks, sound walls, vegetative barriers, opera- tional practices, and so on? For more information, visit: www.culturechange.org/issue19/vehicle_noise.htm www.noiseways.org/ Natural and Manmade Hazards Is the site in a flood or landslide prone area? Is the proposed use appropriate for the site, given the potential hazard(s)? Does the proposed use present the potential for releases or spills of toxic materials? (E.g., above or underground storage tanks, drum storage, pool chemi- cals, etc.) What measures (e.g., engineering controls, design features or buffering) should be employed to eliminate or mitigate the hazard(s)? Solid and Hazardous Waste Disposal Is the geology and hydrology of the site suitable for the proposed waste handling or disposal activity? Is the proposed waste handling or disposal activity compatible with adjacent existing or zoned uses? What design, operational or pollution prevention practices should be employed to reduce the likelihood of releases or to mitigate potential impacts from the proposed waste handling or disposal activity? Are plans in place to prevent release of hazardous materials into the environment in the event of an on- site fire? For more information, visit: www.plannersweb.com/sprawl/solutions_regional.html www.epa.gov/compliance/resources/publications/ej/ reducing_risk_com_vol1.pdf Past Site Uses Is there historic evidence of solid or hazardous waste disposal or releases on or adjacent to the site? If so, is there potential for exposure or risk due to contamina- tion or explosive gases? What additional information, monitoring, or mitigation measures of these sites are necessary? Are new industrial facilities planned? Have the potential impacts on health been assessed? For more information, visit: www.sustainable.doe.gov/landuse/brownf.shtml www.brownfield.org/Action/Landuse/BAP%20land.pdf Bulk Storage Facilities (e.g., chemicals, fertilizers, etc.) What design, operational or pollution prevention practices should be employed to reduce the likelihood of releases or to mitigate potential impacts in the event of a release? Are adequate secondary containment measures proposed? Does the facility have an adequate proposal for or an approved spill prevention control and countermeasures (SPCC) plan? Is the facility near vulnerable resources that may require contingency planning for protection in the event of an on-site fire? For more information, visit: www.epa.gov/nerlesd1/land-sci/pdf/335leb99.pdf Zoonosis Is the site on or adjacent to an area that might involve the risk of zoonotic disease transmission such as West Nile virus? If so, have measures been taken to prevent spread of zoonotic diseases such as filling in pools of water or open ditches that may provide breeding grounds for mosquitos or vermin? 9 Public Health in Land Use Planning & Community Design Checklist National Association of County and City Health Officials (NACCHO) Environmental Health Program Staff 1100 17th Street, NW • 2nd Floor • Washington, DC 20036 Phone (202) 783-5550 • Fax (202) 783-1583 • www.naccho.org Have abatement/vector control measures been considered? If lethal control is proposed, is the appli- cant aware of regulatory standards for controlled use of pesticides? Health Equity Are disadvantaged populations at greater risk of expo- sure to environmental hazards? How are potential hazards distributed across the community among different population groups? Are affected residents involved in the planning process? Have they been involved in providing data about their neighborhoods? Does the proposed project present unsafe conditions or deter access and free mobility for the physically handicapped? Are there information barriers preventing people with disabilities from participating in the planning process? What is the overall picture of environmental hazards among all of the categories listed in the checklist, particularly for low-income communities? What zoning decisions under consideration would alleviate or exacerbate the potential for creating environmental exposures to contaminants? What health data exist for the community that indicate leading causes of mortality and morbidity? How might they be important for expected redevelopment? For more information, visit: www.sprawlwatch.org/health.pdf www.ejrc.cau.edu/natsmartgrwthinit.htm 9 9 Additional Resources www.nrdc.org/cities/smartGrowth/solve/solveinx.asp www.biodiversityproject.org/messagekit.htm Case Studies www.plannersweb.com/sprawl/solutions_regional.html www.nga.org/common/issueBriefDetailPrint/ 1,1434,2488,00.html   Sunset Area Community Planned Action  Environmental Impact Statement  I‐1 December 2010 ICF 593.1    Public Health in Land Use Planning & Community Design  Sunset Area Community Planned Action  Introduction  The purpose of this analysis is to provide a qualitative review of the proposed Sunset Area  Community Planned Action including the Potential Sunset Terrace Redevelopment Subarea in terms  of the proposals’ alignment with principles of healthy communities as well as how the proposals  may be modified to improve alignment with principles of healthy communities.  A broad checklist  developed by National Association of County and City Health Officials (NACCHO) and the Tri‐County  Health Department in Colorado is used as a screening tool to address public health topics in relation  to proposed redevelopment plans.  For each topic on the checklist a brief review is provided, and  where appropriate, reference is made to the Draft Environmental Impact Statement (Draft EIS)  chapter and section where more information can be found. Unless otherwise stated, the conclusions  apply to the entire Planned Action Study Area including the Potential Sunset Terrace  Redevelopment Subarea.  Water Quality  The City of Renton provides a water utility and has regulatory authority for quality assurance.  See  EIS Sections 3.17 and 4.17 for a discussion of the City’s water utility.  The City of Renton has a stormwater utility and a constructed stormwater system as described in  EIS Sections 3.17 and 4.17.  Each of the alternatives would result in a slight increase in the effective  impervious area of the Planned Action Study Area.  However, untreated pollutant generating  surfaces would decrease.  With Alternatives 2 and 3 there would be much greater emphasis on green  infrastructure including Green Connections.1  A Drainage Master Plan would be adopted. Planned  Action Study Area redevelopment would likely result in an improvement of runoff and recharge  water quality. In addition, the net change in effective impervious area can be adequately mitigated  through the self‐mitigating features of the action alternatives and through implementation of the  stormwater code.  The Planned Action Study Area overlies an aquifer.  Most of the study area is in residential and  institutional use, and this pattern will continue to predominate in the future.  Commercial and mixed  uses lie along NE Sunset Boulevard, and some existing uses use underground storage tanks, e.g. gas  stations. New construction and commercial uses that have the potential for hazardous materials  must comply with the City of Renton’s aquifer protection regulations at RMC 4‐3‐050.   In addition,  state and federal requirements apply to uses that may use hazardous materials as described in  Sections 3.7 and 4.7 of the EIS.                                                                    1 Green Connections refers to public stormwater facility development serving desired new private development as  well as public facilities and rights of way.  City of Renton    Appendix I   Sunset Area Community Planned Action  Environmental Impact Statement  I‐2 December 2010 ICF 593.1    Wastewater  The proposed wastewater collection system is maintained by the City of Renton. Wastewater  treatment is provided by King County. The collection system requires replacement of antiquated  lines and this is accounted in proposed City plans and alternatives.  See EIS Sections 3.17 and 4.17.  Water Quantity  The City’s water supply is principally from aquifers and associated wells, and there is adequate  water supply for the Planned Action Study Area.  The City has regulations to protect the aquifer at  RMC 4‐3‐050. See EIS Sections 3.17 and 4.17 for a discussion of the City’s water utility.  Air Quality  Although population and vehicle travel would increase in the study area, the increase in tailpipe  emissions would be very small relative to the overall regional tailpipe emissions within the Puget  Sound air basin. Based on Puget Sound Regional Council (PSRC) air quality conformity analysis,  forecasted regional emissions for its 2030 planning year are far below the allowable budgets.  Temporary, localized dust and odor impacts could occur during the construction activities.  Mitigation measures in EIS Section 4.2 would require air quality control plans for construction  activities in the Planned Action Study Area.  Transit Oriented Development (TOD) is promoted in City plans and codes, and is expected to reduce  greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions compared to traditional development by reducing vehicle trips and  fuel usage. Alternatives 2 and 3 provide for greater GHG emissions reductions than Alternative 1 due  to a greater amount of TOD.  Opportunities for Physical Fitness  Additional growth will create a demand for parks and recreation resources. Alternatives provide  additional parks and recreation opportunities such as at Sunset Terrace.  Opportunities for shared  City and School District facilities, and locations where additional parks and recreation could be  added, are proposed in the Planned Action Study Area. See mitigation measures in EIS Section 4.15  for additional opportunities.  Mixed use development is proposed under each Alternative.  Alternatives 2 and 3 propose complete  streets containing improved non‐motorized connections, as well as improved transit stops and  urban design features.  See Chapter 2 for more discussion of features, particularly Table 2‐4.  City of Renton    Appendix I   Sunset Area Community Planned Action  Environmental Impact Statement  I‐3 December 2010 ICF 593.1    Transportation and Injury Prevention  City transportation plans and Alternatives 2 and 3 promote a range of pedestrian walkability,  bicycle, and transit enhancements to improve safety and connectivity. See Chapter 2 for more  discussion of features, particularly Table 2‐4.  See also the green streets analysis in EIS Section 4.14.  Noise  Sensitive uses such as residences are found along NE Sunset Boulevard. Traffic volumes along NE  Sunset Boulevard currently result in noise conditions that are above 65 dBA. This is normally  unacceptable for noise sensitive uses.  Section 4.6 of the EIS addresses measures that can be  employed to mitigate current and future traffic noise, such as site design and construction  standards.  Natural and Manmade Hazards  The Planned Action Study Area is relatively free of hazards. There are no floodplains. There are  relatively few areas with steep slopes or landslide hazards. See Section 3.1 of the EIS.  Most of the study area is in residential and institutional use, and this pattern will continue to  predominate in the future.  Commercial and mixed uses lie along NE Sunset Boulevard, and some  existing uses use underground storage tanks, e.g. gas stations. New construction and commercial  uses that have the potential for hazardous materials must comply with the City of Renton’s aquifer  protection regulations at RMC 4‐3‐050.   In addition, state and federal requirements apply to uses  that may use hazardous materials as described in Sections 3.7 and 4.7 of the EIS.  Solid and Hazardous Waste Disposal  Solid waste disposal is handled by franchise haulers in accordance with County and State  regulations per Sections 3.16 and 4.16 of the EIS. Regarding use hazardous materials, please see  “Natural and Manmade Hazards.”  Given the nature of the study area for residential, commercial  retail, and school/park/public service uses, no hazardous waste disposal is anticipated.  Past Site Uses  Much of the Planned Action Study Area is intact since the 1940s when the area largely developed.   Past site uses include single family, multifamily, commercial, and mixed uses as well as schools,  parks, fire station, and other institutional uses.  No landfills are located in the Planned Action Study Area. No industrial uses are located within or  planned for the Study Area.  City of Renton    Appendix I   Sunset Area Community Planned Action  Environmental Impact Statement  I‐4 December 2010 ICF 593.1    Bulk Storage Facilities (e.g., chemicals, fertilizers, etc.)  No bulk storage facilities are proposed.  Zoonosis  The study area is part of the Renton Highlands and is does not contain water bodies or ditches.  Health Equity  The City of Renton and Renton Housing Authority have involved the community in the planning of  the study area; see Section 2.5.2 of the EIS.    As noted in Sections 3.11 and 4.11 of the EIS, Alternatives 2 and 3 would result in primarily  beneficial impacts associated with new dwelling units, new civic facilities and parks, improvements  in non‐motorized transportation, and new employment opportunities in the surrounding area.  During construction and in the short‐term residents would be subject to construction activities and  the tenants Sunset Terrace complex would be required to relocate during demolition and  construction. However, construction mitigation and relocation assistance mitigation measures  would minimize impacts.  See also Water Quality, Air Quality, Noise, and Natural and Manmade Hazards above.  Water quality  would improve particularly as a result of the planned green infrastructure and compliance with City  codes. Air quality emissions would not be adverse and mixed use development would decrease GHG  emissions. Noise along one major route, NE Sunset Boulevard, currently exceeds noise thresholds  for sensitive uses, but there are site plan and construction techniques that can reduce impacts.  The  neighborhood contains typical residential, institutional, and commercial retail and service uses; city  standards for aquifer protection and state and federal requirements for the use of hazardous  materials are expected to minimize impacts.  Appendix J Sunset Terrace Redevelopment Subarea and NE Sunset Boulevard Cultural Resources Survey Report   CULTURAL RESOURCES REPORT COVER SHEET Author: J. Tait Elder, MA, Melissa Cascella, MA, and Christopher Hetzel, MA Title of Report: Cultural Resources Survey Report—Potential Sunset Terrace Redevelopment Subarea and NE Sunset Boulevard Date of Report: October 2010 County(ies): King Section: 9 Township: 23 Range: 5E Quad: Mercer Island 47122-E2 and Renton 47122-D2 Acres: Approximately 13 acres PDF of report submitted (REQUIRED) Yes Historic Property Export Files submitted? Yes No Archaeological Site(s)/Isolate(s) Found or Amended? Yes No TCP(s) found? Yes No Replace a draft? Yes No Satisfy a DAHP Archaeological Excavation Permit requirement? Yes # No DAHP Archaeological Site #:     C ULTURAL RESOURCES SURVEY REPORT  POTENTIAL  SUNSET TERRACE REDEVELOPMENT  SUBAREA AND NE SUNSET BOULEVARD  P REPARED FOR:  City of Renton  NEPA Responsible Entity and SEPA Lead Agency  Department of Community and Economic Development  1055 S. Grady Way  Renton, WA 98057    In partnership with  Renton Housing Authority  2900 Northeast 10th Street  Renton, Washington 98056  P REPARED BY:  J. Tait Elder, MA, Melissa Cascella, MA, and Christopher Hetzel, MA  ICF International  710 Second Avenue, Suite 550  Seattle, WA 98104  Contact: Christopher Hetzel  206.801.2817  October 2010      J. Tait Elder, MA, Melissa Cascella, MA, and Christopher Hetzel, MA. 2010.  Cultural Resources Survey Report—Potential Sunset Terrace  Redevelopment Subarea and NE Sunset Boulevard. October. (ICF 593.10)  Seattle, WA. Prepared for City of Renton, in partnership with Renton  Housing Authority, Renton, WA.  Cultural Resources Survey Report—Potential Sunset Terrace  Redevelopment Subarea and NE Sunset Boulevard i October 2010 ICF 00593.10   Contents  Chapter 1 Introduction ...................................................................................................................... 1‐1  Project Description ................................................................................................................. 1‐1  Project Background ................................................................................................................ 1‐2  Personnel ................................................................................................................... 1‐2  Location ..................................................................................................................... 1‐2  Area of Potential Effects ............................................................................................ 1‐2  Regulatory Context .................................................................................................... 1‐5  Chapter 2 Environmental and Cultural Setting ................................................................................... 2‐1  Environmental Setting ............................................................................................................ 2‐1  Geologic Background ................................................................................................. 2‐1  Flora and Fauna ......................................................................................................... 2‐1  Cultural Setting ....................................................................................................................... 2‐2  Precontact ................................................................................................................. 2‐2  Ethnographic and Ethnohistoric ................................................................................ 2‐2  Historic Context ......................................................................................................... 2‐3  Chapter 3 Literature Review and Consultation .................................................................................. 3‐1  Existing Data and Background Data ....................................................................................... 3‐1  Records Research ...................................................................................................... 3‐1  Chapter 4 Research Design ................................................................................................................ 4‐1  Objectives and Expectations .................................................................................................. 4‐1  Research Methods .................................................................................................................. 4‐1  Archaeological Investigations .................................................................................... 4‐1  Historical Resources Survey ...................................................................................... 4‐2  Chapter 5 Results .............................................................................................................................. 5‐1  Archaeological Investigations ................................................................................................. 5‐1  NE Sunset Boulevard Right‐of‐Way ........................................................................... 5‐1  Edmonds‐Glenwood Lot ............................................................................................ 5‐1  Harrington Lot ........................................................................................................... 5‐1  Sunset Terrace Public Housing Complex ................................................................... 5‐1  Summary of Shovel Tests .......................................................................................... 5‐2  Historic Resources Survey ...................................................................................................... 5‐6  Chapter 6 Analysis and National Register of Historic PlacesEvaluation .............................................. 6‐1  Environmental Analysis .......................................................................................................... 6‐1  National Register of Historic PlacesEvaluation ...................................................................... 6‐2  City of Renton  Contents     Cultural Resources Survey Report—Potential Sunset Terrace  Redevelopment Subarea and NE Sunset Boulevard ii October 2010 ICF 00593.10   Chapter 7 Conclusions and Recommendations .................................................................................. 7‐1  Conclusions ............................................................................................................................. 7‐1  Recommendations ................................................................................................................. 7‐1  Chapter 8 References ........................................................................................................................ 8‐1    Appendix A. Correspondence  Appendix B. Historic Property Inventory Forms  Appendix C. Unanticipated Discovery Plan    Tables  Table 1. Cultural Resources Surveys within 1 Mile of the Area of Potential Effects ................................ 3‐1  Table 2. Shovel Test Data ................................................................................................................................................. 5‐4  Table 3. Properties in Area of Potential Effects Identified as 45 Years of Age or Older ......................... 5‐7  Table 4. Properties in Area of Potential Effects Identified as Less than 45 Years Old ............................ 5‐8    Figures    Figure 1. Project Location ................................................................................................................................................ 1‐3  Figure 2. Area of Potential Effects ................................................................................................................................ 1‐4  Figure 3. Shovel Test Locations and Historic Resources Survey Results ..................................................... 5‐3    City of Renton  Contents     Cultural Resources Survey Report—Potential Sunset Terrace  Redevelopment Subarea and NE Sunset Boulevard iii October 2010 ICF 00593.10   Acronyms and Abbreviations    APE  Area of Potential Effects  APN  Assessor Parcel Number  BP  before present  CFR  Code of Federal Regulations  City  City of Renton  cm  centimeter  DAHP  Washington State Department of Archaeology and Historic Preservation  FHA  Federal Housing Administration  GPS  global positioning system  HUD  U. S. Department of Housing and Urban Development  NEPA  National Environmental Policy Act  NHPA  National Historic Preservation Act  NRHP  National Register of Historic Places  RHA  Renton Housing Authority  SEPA  Washington State Environmental Policy Act  USC  United States Code  WHR  Washington Heritage Register  WISAARD  Washington Information System for Architectural and Archaeological Records  Database      Cultural Resources Survey Report—Potential Sunset Terrace  Redevelopment Subarea and NE Sunset Boulevard 1‐1 October 2010 ICF 00593.10   Chapter 1  Introduction  Project Description  The City of Renton (City) and the Renton Housing Authority (RHA) are proposing a series of  activities to revitalize an area known as the Sunset Area Community, located in the vicinity of NE  Sunset Boulevard (SR 900) east of Interstate 405 in the city of Renton, Washington. The activities  would include redevelopment of the Sunset Terrace public housing complex at 970 Harrington NE  and its vicinity, including improvements to NE Sunset Boulevard. The Sunset Terrace public housing  complex redevelopment receives federal funding from the U. S. Department of Housing and Urban  Development (HUD); future improvements to NE Sunset Boulevard are also likely to receive federal  funding in the future. HUD is the lead federal agency responsible for compliance with Section 106 of  the National Historic Preservation Act (NHPA) (16 USC 470 et seq.). In accordance with specific  statutory authority and HUD’s regulations at Section 24 Part 58 of the Code of Federal Regulations  (CFR), the City is completing the necessary environmental review under the National Environmental  Policy Act (NEPA) (42 United States Code [USC] 4321‐4347) and Section 106 of the NHPA. ICF  International (ICF) conducted a cultural resources study for the project to assist the City in fulfilling  these requirements. The study comprised an archaeological investigation and a historic resources  survey.  The proposed Sunset Terrace Redevelopment Project, hereafter referred to as the undertaking, will  occur on approximately 8 acres of RHA‐owned property occupied by existing public housing units,  known as Sunset Terrace, located at the intersection of NE Sunset Boulevard and Harrington Avenue  NE; 3 acres of vacant land along Edmonds Avenue NE, Glenwood Avenue NE, and Sunset Lane NE;  and additional property adjacent to Sunset Terrace along Harrington Avenue NE that RHA intends to  purchase for housing and associated services. Conceptual plans propose redevelopment of Sunset  Terrace and the adjacent properties with mixed‐income, mixed‐use residential and commercial  space and public amenities. Existing public housing units on the property would be removed and  replaced with new construction. The new construction would include a 1‐to‐1 unit replacement for  all 100 existing public housing units and integrated public amenities, such as a new  recreation/community center, a new public library, a new park/open space, retail shopping and  commercial space, and/or green infrastructure.   Proposed improvements along NE Sunset Boulevard would include widening of the right‐of‐way to  allow for intersection improvements and the construction of roundabouts, planted medians, bike  lanes, crosswalks, and sidewalks. New natural stormwater infrastructure would be integrated into  the new development and the streets improvements.  City of Renton  Introduction   Cultural Resources Survey Report—Potential Sunset Terrace  Redevelopment Subarea and NE Sunset Boulevard 1‐2 October 2010 ICF 00593.10   Project Background  Personnel  Christopher Hetzel, MA, architectural historian, served as cultural lead for this project and Principal  Investigator for the consideration of built environment resources. J. Tait Elder, MA, archaeologist,  was Principal Investigator for archaeology and led the field crew during the archaeological  investigations. Melissa Cascella, MA, assisted the principal investigators in drafting this cultural  resources survey report, and Patrick Reed assisted with the field investigation and literature search.  Location  The undertaking is located in the city of Renton, King County, Washington, in the Northwest Quarter  of Section 9, Township 23, Range 5 East (Figure 1). It is in an area known as the Sunset Area  Community, situated in the vicinity of NE Sunset Boulevard east of Interstate 405 in the city of  Renton, Washington. The project activities would include redevelopment of the following  properties:  z The Sunset Terrace public housing complex at 970 Harrington NE (Assessor Parcel Numbers  [APNs]: 7227801085, 7227801055, 7227801400).  z Vacant lots known as the Harrington Lot (APN: 7227801785) and the Edmonds‐Glenwood Lot  (APNs: 0923059080 and 7227801375).  z Residential lots at 1139 Glenwood Avenue NE (APN: 7227801380), 1060 Glenwood Avenue NE  (APN: 7227801310), 1052 Glenwood Avenue NE (APN: 7227801305), 1067 Harrington Avenue  NE (APN: 7227801300), and 1073 Harrington Avenue NE (APN: 7227801295).  z A segment of NE Sunset Boulevard between approximately Monroe Avenue NE on the east and  Edmonds Avenue NE on the west.  Area of Potential Effects  The Area of Potential Effects (APE) is defined as the geographic area or areas within which the  project may directly or indirectly cause change of character or use of historic properties  (i.e., archaeological sites, traditional cultural properties, and/or built environment resources). It  includes the horizontal and vertical extents of the proposed project activities on parcels in and  adjacent to Sunset Terrace considered for redevelopment, and all parcels that abut NE Sunset  Boulevard between about Edmonds Avenue NE and Monroe Avenue NE (Figure 2). This area would  encompass all the areas of proposed ground disturbance and potential effects to neighboring  properties posed by road and infrastructure improvements along NE Sunset Boulevard. The areas of  ground disturbance would be limited to parcels comprising the Sunset Terrace public housing  complex; the Harrington (RHA’s Piha site) and Edmonds‐Glenwood lots; the residential parcels at  1139 Glenwood Avenue NE, 1060 Glenwood Avenue NE, 1052 Glenwood Avenue NE, 1067  Harrington Avenue NE, and 1073 Harrington Avenue NE; and the existing highway right‐of‐way  along NE Sunset Boulevard. The depth of the anticipated ground disturbance will vary, depending on  the design the proposed development and street improvements. The horizontal APE has also been  expanded to include parcels adjacent to NE Sunset Boulevard.  Figure 1 Project Location Cultural Resources Survey Report00593.10/GIS - Revised: 10/25/2010Area of Potential Effects 0 1,500 3,000750 Feet State of Washington Project Location 0 500 1,000250 Meters ±1:24,000 Source: Mercer Island 47122-E2 and Renton 47122-D2 (7.5' Quadrangle Maps), USGS Figure 2 Area of Potential Effects Cultural Resources Survey Report00593.10/GIS - Revised: 10/13/2010Area of Potential Effects 0 250 500125 Feet 0 100 20050 Meters ±1:6,000 Source: King County NAIP (2009), USDA City of Renton  Introduction   Cultural Resources Survey Report—Potential Sunset Terrace  Redevelopment Subarea and NE Sunset Boulevard 1‐5 October 2010 ICF 00593.10   The City initiated consultation with DAHP and the Muckleshoot Indian Tribe under Section 106 of  the NHPA with letters sent on September 1, 2010 requesting comments on the APE and input on the  proposed undertaking. Copies of the notification letters are provided in Appendix A.  Regulatory Context  Federal, state, and local regulations recognize the public’s interest in cultural resources and the  public benefit of preserving them. These laws and regulations require analysts to consider how a  project might affect cultural resources and to take steps to avoid or reduce potential damage to  them. A cultural resource can be considered as any property valued (e.g., monetarily, aesthetically,  religiously) by a group of people. Valued properties can be historical in character or date to the  prehistoric past (i.e., the time prior to written records).  The undertaking requires federal funding and must satisfy the requirements established under the  NEPA and Section 106 of the NHPA. The NHPA is the primary mandate governing projects under  federal jurisdiction that might affect cultural resources. The purpose of this report is to identify and  evaluate cultural resources in the project area, fulfilling the requirements of NEPA and Section 106  of the NHPA, and to assess the potential effects of the build alternatives on cultural resources.  Federal  National Environmental Policy Act  NEPA requires the federal government to carry out its plans and programs in such a way as to  preserve important historic, cultural, and natural aspects of our national heritage by considering,  among other things, unique characteristics of the geographic area such as proximity to historic or  cultural resources (40 CFR 1508.27(b)(3)) and the degree to which the action may adversely affect  districts, sites, highways, structures, or objects listed in or eligible for listing in the National Register  of Historic Places (NRHP) (40 CFR 1508.27(b)(8)). Although NEPA does not define standards  specific to cultural resource impact analyses, the implementing regulations of NEPA (40 CFR  1502.25) state that, to the fullest extent possible, “agencies shall prepare draft environmental  impact statements concurrently with and integrated with environmental impact analyses and  related surveys and studies required by…the National Historic Preservation Act of 1966 (16 USC  470 et seq.).”   Although NEPA statutes and implementing regulations do not contain detailed information  concerning cultural resource impact analyses, Section 106 of the NHPA, with which NEPA must be  coordinated, details standards and processes for such analyses. The implementing regulations of  Section 106 states, “Agency officials should ensure that preparation of an environmental assessment  (EA) and finding of no significant impact (FONSI) or an EIS and record of decision (ROD) includes  appropriate scoping, identification of historic properties, assessment of effects upon them, and  consultation leading to resolution of any adverse effects” (36 CFR 800.8[a][3]). Section 106,  therefore, typically forms the crux of federal agencies’ NEPA cultural resources impact analyses and  the identification, consultation, evaluation, affects assessment and, mitigation required for both  NEPA; and Section 106 compliance should be coordinated and completed simultaneously. This  practice is followed in the present analysis.  City of Renton  Introduction   Cultural Resources Survey Report—Potential Sunset Terrace  Redevelopment Subarea and NE Sunset Boulevard 1‐6 October 2010 ICF 00593.10   Section 106 of the National Historic Preservation Act  Section 106 of the NHPA requires federal agencies to consider the effects of funded or approved  undertakings that have the potential to impact any district, site, building, structure, or object that is  listed in or eligible for listing in the National Register of Historic Places (NRHP), and the State  Historic Preservation Officer, affected tribes, and other stakeholders an opportunity to comment.  Although compliance with Section 106 is the responsibility of the lead federal agency, others can  undertake the work necessary to comply. Pursuant to the HUD’s regulations at 24 CFR 58, the City is  authorized to assume responsibility for environmental review, decision‐making, and action that  would otherwise to apply HUD under NEPA, which includes NEPA lead agency responsibility. The  Section 106 process is codified in 36 CFR 800 and consists of five basic steps:  1. Initiate process by coordinating with other environmental reviews, consulting with the State  Historic Preservation Officer (SHPO), identifying and consulting with interested parties, and  identifying points in the process to seek input from the public and to notify the public of  proposed actions.  2. Identify cultural resources and evaluate them for NRHP eligibility (the process for which is  explained below), resulting in the identification of historic properties.  3. Assess effects of the project on historic properties.  4. Consult with the SHPO and interested parties regarding any adverse effects on historic  properties; and, if necessary, develop an agreement that addresses the treatment of these  properties (e.g., a Memorandum of Agreement [MOA]).  5. Proceed in accordance with the project MOA, if an MOA is developed.  An adverse effect on a historic property is found when an activity may alter, directly or indirectly,  any of the characteristics of the historic property that render it eligible for inclusion in the NRHP.  The alteration of characteristics is considered an adverse effect if it may diminish the integrity of the  historic property’s location, design, setting, materials, workmanship, feeling, or association. The  assessment of effects to historic properties is conducted in accordance with the guidelines set forth  in 36 CFR 800.5.  National Register of Historic Places  First authorized by the Historic Sites Act of 1935, the NRHP was established by the NHPA as “an  authoritative guide to be used by federal, state, and local governments; private groups; and citizens  to identify the nation’s cultural resources and to indicate what properties should be considered for  protection from destruction or impairment.” The NRHP recognizes properties that are significant at  the national, state, and local levels. According to NRHP guidelines, the quality of significance in  American history, architecture, archaeology, engineering, and culture is present in districts, sites,  buildings, structures, and objects that possess integrity of location, design, setting, materials,  workmanship, feeling, and association, and that meet any of the following criteria:  Criterion A. A property is associated with events that have made a significant contribution to the  broad patterns of our history.  Criterion B. A property is associated with the lives of persons significant in our past.  Criterion C. A property embodies the distinctive characteristics of a type, period, or method of  construction, or that represent the work of a master, or that possess high artistic values, or that  City of Renton  Introduction   Cultural Resources Survey Report—Potential Sunset Terrace  Redevelopment Subarea and NE Sunset Boulevard 1‐7 October 2010 ICF 00593.10   represent a significant and distinguishable entity whose components may lack individual  distinction.  Criterion D. A property yields, or may be likely to yield, information important in prehistory or  history.  Ordinarily, birthplaces, cemeteries, or graves of historical figures; properties owned by religious  institutions or used for religious purposes; structures that have been moved from their original  locations; reconstructed historic buildings; properties primarily commemorative in nature; and  properties that have achieved significance within the past 50 years are not considered eligible for  the NRHP, unless they satisfy certain conditions.  The NRHP requires that a resource not only meet one of these criteria, but must also possess  integrity. Integrity is the ability of a property to convey historical significance. The evaluation of a  resource’s integrity must be grounded in an understanding of that resource’s physical  characteristics and how those characteristics relate to its significance. The NRHP recognizes seven  aspects or qualities that, in various combinations, define the integrity of a property, including:  location, design, setting, materials, workmanship, feeling, and association.   An adverse effect on a historic property is found when an activity may alter, directly or indirectly,  any of the characteristics of the historic property that render it eligible for inclusion in the NRHP.  The alteration of characteristics is considered an adverse effect if it may diminish the integrity of the  historic property’s location, design, setting, materials, workmanship, feeling, or association. The  assessment of effects on historic properties is conducted in accordance with the guidelines set forth  in 36 CFR 800.5.  State  Washington State Environmental Policy Act  The Washington State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA) requires that all major actions sponsored,  funded, permitted, or approved by state and/or local agencies be planned so that environmental  considerations—such as impacts on cultural resources—are considered when state‐agency‐enabled  projects affect properties of historical, archaeological, scientific, or cultural importance (Washington  Administrative Code 197‐11‐960). These regulations closely resemble NEPA.   Under SEPA, the Washington State Department of Archaeology and Historic Preservation (DAHP) is  the specified agency with the technical expertise to consider the effects of a proposed action on  cultural resources and to provide formal recommendations to local governments and other state  agencies for appropriate treatments or actions. DAHP does not regulate the treatment of cultural  resources found to be significant. A local governing authority may choose to uphold the DAHP  recommendations and may require mitigation of adverse effects on significant cultural resources.  For the purposes of this analysis, the degree to which the alternatives adversely affect districts, sites,  buildings, structures, and objects listed or eligible for listing in the NRHP is the primary criterion for  determining significant impacts under SEPA. Secondary criteria include whether an alternative has  the potential to affect districts, sites, buildings, structures, and objects listed in or eligible for listing  in the Washington Heritage Register (WHR), the state equivalent of the NRHP.  City of Renton  Introduction   Cultural Resources Survey Report—Potential Sunset Terrace  Redevelopment Subarea and NE Sunset Boulevard 1‐8 October 2010 ICF 00593.10   Washington Heritage Register  The WHR is an official listing of historically significant sites and properties found throughout the  state. The list is maintained by DAHP and includes districts, sites, buildings, structures, and objects  that have been identified and documented as being significant in local or state history, architecture,  archaeology, engineering or culture. To qualify for placement on the WHR, the resource must meet  the following criteria.  z A building, site, structure or object must be at least 50 years old. If newer, the resource should  have documented exceptional significance.  z The resource should have a high to medium level of integrity (i.e., it should retain important  character‐defining features from its historic period of construction).  z The resource should have documented historical significance at the local, state, or federal level.  Sites listed on the NRHP are automatically added to the WHR and hence a separate nomination form  does not need to be completed.   Governor’s Executive Order 05‐05  Washington State Executive Order 05‐05—which requires state agencies with capital improvement  projects to integrate DAHP, the Governor’s Office of Indian Affairs, and concerned tribes into their  capital project planning process—was signed into action by Governor Chris Gregoire in November  2005. All state agency capital construction projects or land acquisitions, not otherwise reviewed  under federal law, must comply with this Executive Order, if the projects or acquisitions have the  potential to affect cultural resources. Agencies with projects or acquisitions subject to review under  the Executive Order must consult with DAHP and concerned tribes and invite their participation in  project planning. If cultural resources are present, then reasonable steps to avoid, minimize, or  mitigate potential effects must be taken.  Local  The City currently does not have a local historic preservation ordinance.    Cultural Resources Survey Report—Potential Sunset Terrace  Redevelopment Subarea and NE Sunset Boulevard 2‐1 October 2010 ICF 00593.10   Chapter 2  Environmental and Cultural Setting  Environmental Setting  Geologic Background  The APE is located within the Puget Lowland, a structural and topographic basin that lies between  the Cascade Range and Olympic Mountains. The modern topography of the Puget Lowland is  primarily the result of surface scouring and moraine formation caused by the most recent glacial  advance, known as the Vashon stade of the Fraser glaciation, which took place between 14,000 and  20,000 years before present (BP) (Booth et al. 2009; Easterbrook 2003). As a result of this glacial  activity, the APE is characterized as a moderately glacial drift upland, composed of glacial till  (Mullineaux 1965). In the modern era, the surface of the APE has been modified to accommodate for  development. Geotechnical borings from a previous project, excavated along NE Sunset Boulevard  within the APE, revealed four to seven feet of fill along the roadway (Golder Associates 1996, 2003).  It is not known whether fill to this depth extends away from the roadway. Similar testing completed  prior to construction of the Sunset Terrace public housing complex in 1958–1959 also indicate that  limited surface grading occured on‐site during the complex’s construction (George W. Stoddard‐ Huggard & Associates 1958).  Flora and Fauna  The project APE is located in the Puget Sound area subtype western hemlock (Tsuga heterophylla)  vegetation zone. Softwoods such as Douglas fir (Pseudotsuga menzesii), western hemlock, and  western red cedar (Thuja plicata) are the dominant tree species in the region, while hardwoods such  as red alder (Alnus rubra) and bigleaf maple (Acer macrophyllum) are generally subordinate and  found near water courses or riparian habitats. Garry oak (Quercus garryana) groves are found at  lower elevations. In some areas, stands of pines (Pinus spp.) are major forest constituents, along  with Douglas fir (Franklin and Dyrness 1988:72). Understory shrubs with potential food and  resource value in the western hemlock zone include, but are not limited to, swordfern (Polystichum  muritum), bracken fern (Pteridium aquilinum), Oregon grape (Mahonia aquifolium), vine maple (Acer  circinatum), huckleberry (Vaccinium spp.), blackberry (Rubus spp.), ocean spray (Holodiscu discolor),  salal (Gaultheria shallon), blueberries and huckleberries (Vaccinium sp.), wapato (Sagittaria  latifolia) and red elderberry (Sambucus racemosa).   Terrestrial faunal resources in the region include, but are not limited to, mule deer (Odocoileus  hemionus), elk (Cervus elaphus), cougar (Puma concolor), wolf (Canis lupus), coyote (Canis latrans),  black bear (Ursus americanus), squirrels (Scirius sp.), muskrat (Ondatra sp.), and raccoon (Procyon  lotor) (Dalquest 1948).   City of Renton  Environmental and Cultural Setting   Cultural Resources Survey Report—Potential Sunset Terrace  Redevelopment Subarea and NE Sunset Boulevard 2‐2 October 2010 ICF 00593.10   Cultural Setting  Precontact  Cultural developments in the Puget Sound area have been summarized by a number of reviewers  (Kidd 1964; Greengo and Houston 1970; Nelson 1990; Larson and Lewarch 1995; Ames and  Maschner 1999; Blukis Onat et al. 2001; Forsman and Lewarch 2001), and most recently by Kopperl  (2004). The archaeological record and cultural histories of the prehistory of Puget Sound and  surrounding areas generally divide the prehistoric cultural sequence into multiple phases or periods  from about 13,000 BP to AD 1700. These phases are academic in nature and do not necessarily  reflect tribal viewpoints. A summary of the phases is provided below, based on the periods proposed  by Kopperl (2004):  z Paleo‐Indian Period (11,000 to 8000 BP). Generalized resource development in a post‐glacial  environment. Site contents consist of large lithic bifaces and bone technology.  z Early Period (8,000 to 5,000 BP). Inland sites with lithic artifacts, rarely found with associated  plant or animal remains, or hearth structures.  z Middle Period (5,000 BP to 2,500 BP). Increase socioeconomic complexity, exploitation of a wider  range o f environments, and utilization of marine resources.  z Late Period (2,500 BP to European contact). The establishment of large semi‐sedentary  populations, increased diversity of hunting, fishing, plant processing, and woodworking tools,  followed by European contact.  Ethnographic and Ethnohistoric  Ethnographic information recorded during the early part of the twentieth century indicates that the  Planned Action Study Area is located within the territory of a Native American group traditionally  known as the Duwamish. The Duwamish people traditonally spoke the Southern Lushootseed  language, which is one of two Coast Salish languages spoken in the Puget Sound (Suttles and Lane  1990:486). They inhabited areas that encompassed Salmon Bay, Lake Union, Portage Bay, Union  Bay, Lake Washington, and their tributary streams (Blukis Onat and Kiers 2007:6).   The Duwamish people hunted deer, elk, bear, ducks, geese, and other game animals and waterfowl,  when available. Inland of the Puget Sound, they fished for salmon when available (Duwamish Tribe  2010). Plant foods such as sprouts, roots, bulbs, berries, and nuts were collected as well (Suttles and  Lane 1990:489) Although ethnographic village locations and place names are documented south of  the Planned Action Study Area along the Cedar River, no ethnographically documented villages or  place names are known to exist within the the study area (Hilbert et al. 2001)  European American settlement of the Puget Sound area in the 1850s severely disrupted the  Duwamish way of life. Early contact between the Duwamish and European Americans was cordial,  and the Duwamish were essential to the survival of many early settlers. As the city of Seattle and the  surrounding towns grew, natural resources on which the Duwamish relied became increasingly  scarce and other traditional areas became inaccessible as a result of development. Further urban  expansion, combined with the banning of native urban residence in 1865, resulted in many of the  Lake Duwamish people moving away from, or being forced out of, the Seattle area. Many of the  Duwamish people went to reservations where they had relatives, including the Muckleshoot,  City of Renton  Environmental and Cultural Setting   Cultural Resources Survey Report—Potential Sunset Terrace  Redevelopment Subarea and NE Sunset Boulevard 2‐3 October 2010 ICF 00593.10   Suquamish, Tulalip, Lummi, or Snoqualmie reservations (Blukis Onat et al. 2005). Today, some of  the descendents of the Duwamish people are now members of several federally recognized tribes in  including the Muckleshoot Indian Tribe, Suquamish, Tulalip Tribe of Indians, and Snoqualmie Tribe,  while others remain enrolled with the Duwamish tribe, although it is not a federally recognized tribe  (Duwamish Tribe 2010).  Historic Context  Early Beginnings  The first European American settler in the Renton area was Henry Tobin, who arrived in 1853 and  established a 320‐acre claim on the Black River, along with his family (Buerge 1989:22–24; City of  Renton 1989:4). Tobin, together with three partners, subsequently established the Duwamish Coal  Company and built the area’s first sawmill to obtain the lumber necessary for the mining tunnels.  The sawmill was in operation by 1854, but conflicts with Native American groups in the region soon  caused an end to this early business venture (Buerge 1989:22).  Over the few short years of European American settlement in the Puget Sound area, Native  Americans had witnessed important areas of their traditional lifeways occupied and altered by the  new settlers (Thrush 2007:79–80). After establishment of the Washington Territory in 1853, the  new territorial governor began drafting agreements that required the removal of the area’s  remaining Native American populations, to make the land available for further European American.  Enacted in two councils called the Medicine Creek Treaty and the Point Elliott Treaty, the  agreements called for lands to be handed over to the state in exchange for rights to traditional  gathering areas, money and the relocation of native peoples to designated reservations (Buchanan  1859; Buerge 1989:22–23; Peirce 1855; Slauson 2006:3).  After signing the Point Elliot Treaty, local tribal chief Keokuck returned to the Black River area to  find his people deeply divided between feelings of friendship to settlers they knew in the area, and  feelings of resentment and betrayal for being forced to surrender their traditional homelands.  Several regional tribes, including the Yakama and Wenatchee, united together to confront  encroaching settlers, resulting in the conflict referred to as the Yakima Indian War of 1855. Crossing  the mountains, warriors raided settlements and even launched an attack on the city of Seattle itself.  After the Treaty of Point Elliott was ratified by Congress in 1859, the remaining Duwamish living  along the Black River were forced from their land and relocated to reservations (Buerge 1989:23).  The Birth of Renton  After the signing of the Treaty of Point Elliott and the forced removal of the native Duwamish, an  increasing number of settlers entered the area (Buerge 1989:23). In 1856, Erasmus M. Smithers  acquired Tobin’s earlier claim by marrying his widow, and purchased an additional 160 acres in  1857 (Buerge 1989:24; City of Renton 1989:4; Slauson 2006:2). Smithers’ substantial land holdings  eventually became the center of a burgeoning community that would eventually form the city of  Renton. During the 1860s, several additional families settled in the area, and schools and a post  office were established.  Rich deposits of coal found in the mountains surrounding the small community in the 1860s and  1870s furthered its prosperity. Wealthy entrepreneurs, such as Captain William Renton, who had  built an enormous and prosperous sawmill on Bainbridge Island, invested heavily in the area’s coal  City of Renton  Environmental and Cultural Setting   Cultural Resources Survey Report—Potential Sunset Terrace  Redevelopment Subarea and NE Sunset Boulevard 2‐4 October 2010 ICF 00593.10   and transportation industries, allowing the fledgling community’s economy to boom (Buerge  1989:24–27; Slauson 2006:6).  In 1875, Smithers and two partners filed the town plat for the new community and named it Renton  in honor of the investor’s financial backing (The Boeing Company et al. 2001:5; Buerge 1989:27; City  of Renton 1989:4; Slauson 2006:7). The coal‐mining and logging industries continued to draw new  residents to the area (Buerge 1989:30–32; City of Renton 1989:4–5). In 1875, less than 50 people  lived in Renton, but by 1900, 1,176 people called it home (City of Renton 1989:4). Renton was fully  incorporated on September 6, 1901 (The Boeing Company et al. 2001:5; Buerge 1989:37).  Industrial Development  At the turn of the twentieth century, the area’s coal‐mining industry began to decline in importance,  soon to be replaced by a new set of industries. The discovery of superior quality clay deposits at the  south end of Lake Washington led to the establishment of the Renton Clay Works in 1902. By 1917,  this company was the largest brick manufacturing plant in the world (The Boeing Company et al.  2001:5; City of Renton 1989:5). Addressing the growing needs of the railroad, logging, and later  military, during the two World Wars, the Pacific Car & Foundry was first established during this  period, supplying steel, pig iron, and other equipment for the production of railroad boxcars, tanks,  and later, wing spans for aircraft. The company acquired Kenworth Motor Trucks in 1945 and  Peterbilt Motors in 1958, merging them into one company called PACCAR in 1972 (City of Renton  1989:5).  One of the greatest influences on the development of Renton occurred during World War II with the  establishment of the Boeing Company aircraft manufacturing plant at the south end of Lake  Washington (City of Renton 1989:6). Built in 1940, the Renton Boeing plant manufactured B‐29  Superfortress bombers; the plant exponentially increased in size through the course of the war (The  Boeing Company et al. 2001:12). At its height in 1942, the plant employed 44,754 people and  produced approximately 90 planes each month, with a total of 6,981 planes completed before the  war’s end (Slauson 2006:126).   Development in Renton boomed with the flood of jobs and new residents brought by Boeing and  other manufacturers. After the war, Boeing continued to employ as many as 35,000 workers and  PACCAR was the city’s second largest employer (Buerge 1989:82). Dubbed the “Hub City of  Enterprise,” Renton was one of the most important manufacturing centers in the state at this time  (Buerge 1989:82). In the postwar era, new housing, retail shops, schools, churches, and civic  services were established to provide for the new masses, and the federal government provided  nearly $4 million in funds for the construction of new housing alone (Buerge 1989:75–79).  Boeing continued to play a prominent role in Renton’s economy through the rest of the twentieth  century, producing commercial airplanes including the 737, 747, 757, and 767 and employing as  many 25,000 (City of Renton 1989:6). Today, Renton’s economy is shifting towards a greater  economic diversification with technology firms, microbreweries, and the Wizards of the Coast, a  game and card company (The Boeing Company et al. 2001:19; Buerge 1989:88).  Renton Highlands  Despite Renton’s rapid growth in the early twentieth century, the area encompassing in the APE  remained largely undeveloped until the 1940s. The area was logged starting in 1883 (Slauson  2006:42) and Primary State Highway 2 (PSH 2), later known as the Sunset Highway or SR 900, was  City of Renton  Environmental and Cultural Setting   Cultural Resources Survey Report—Potential Sunset Terrace  Redevelopment Subarea and NE Sunset Boulevard 2‐5 October 2010 ICF 00593.10   established through the APE from 1909 through 1910. The route was first paved in 1920, becoming  the principal highway between Seattle and Snoqualmie Pass prior to the construction of the Lake  Washington Floating Bridge in 1940 (Buerge 1989:67; Morning Olympian 1909:3).  Although development in Renton’s downtown grew with the arrival of the highway, the area in the  vicinity of the APE remained primarily rural. With the arrival of the Renton Boeing plant and its tens  of thousands of workers in the 1940s, however, housing development exploded in the area with  many of its existing residential neighborhoods first established during World War II. In order to  accommodate the enormous work force, the federal government embarked on a series of housing  projects in the area (Buerge 1989:75). Known as the “Highlands” south of the highway and as the  “North Highlands” north of the highway, the development of these two neighborhoods relied heavily  on federally loans, grants, and other programs (City of Renton 1989:34). During this early  development, the Highlands emerged as the center of housing project development while the North  Highlands evolved with the construction of mixed commercial and multi‐use family housing along  the highway (City of Renton 1989:34–35).  Overnight, retail and social services emerged to serve the bustling new community. The Highlands  area received its own post office and fire station in the fall of 1943 (Slauson 2006:45, 85), and a  large recreational complex complete with tennis courts, ball fields, and a small gymnasium was  completed in 1949 (Slauson 2006:81). Later improvements included the move of a prominent  Methodist church from downtown Renton to the Highlands area in 1958 and construction of a new  branch of the library in 1979 (Slauson 2006:62, 97). By 1975, the area was almost fully developed  (City of Renton 1989:34–35; Renton History Museum 1975).  Postwar Housing Development and Design  During World War II, population migrations to urban centers combined with the rapid development  of wartime industries caused increasing demand for housing that was much greater than in prior  decades (Madison 1971:i‐ii). Although a series of housing reforms were enacted during the 1930s  Depression era, including establishing the Federal Housing Administration, it was not until the  postwar era that the federal government enacted “the most significant housing legislation ever  passed” to meet this need (Lord 1977:10). In the Housing Act of 1949, a goal was set by the federal  government to provide “a decent home and suitable living environment for every American family”  (Lord 1977:10). The Act outlined an ambitious goal, authorizing the construction of 810,000 new  homes over the next six years (Lord 1977:10).  The result of this legislation was the funding of new homes and housing projects in cities throughout  the nation. Large multifamily housing projects, in particular, were strongly influenced by the tenants  of the Garden City movement. The concept of the Garden City was promulgated in 1902 by Ebenezer  Howard. Howard critically examined the life of urban city dwellers and determined that they  suffered from insufficient access to space and nature. In response, Howard envisioned the Garden  City, a plan for smaller and denser, publically owned communities that could provide the long‐term  planning necessary assure ample access to “fresh air, sunlight, breathing room and playing room”  required for a successful, pleasant and ideal lifestyle (Howard 1902:113; Chambers 1902).  Beginning in the 1940s, the Federal Housing Administration (FHA) adopted many of the ideas and  methods championed by Howard. Addressing the high demands for housing, the FHA turned from  single‐family dwellings to larger apartment complexes suitable for the Garden City ideal (Hanchett  2000:167–168; Rabinowitz 2004:23). Known as garden style apartments, these housing projects  began to increasingly serve a lower‐class population and federal housing began to assume an  City of Renton  Environmental and Cultural Setting   Cultural Resources Survey Report—Potential Sunset Terrace  Redevelopment Subarea and NE Sunset Boulevard 2‐6 October 2010 ICF 00593.10   additional role of redefining “the working‐class community along middle class lines” (Karolak  2000:67). Thus, federal housing embarked on a new campaign to elevate the poor within society by  exposing them to environments which conformed to designs and ideals practiced by the middle  class: garden‐city ideal (Karolak 2000:67–70). These federal housing projects used the principals  developed by Howard, requiring open space and holistic planning of communities, as government  architects tailored “the kitchens, bathrooms, and living rooms…of American workers to encourage  loyalty, hard work, thrift, and other middle‐class values” (Karolak 2000:76).  Sunset Terrace Public Housing Complex  In Renton Highlands, federal funding during the postwar period included significant investment in  affordable housing. Central to this effort was construction of the Sunset Terrace public housing  complex along the north side of Primary State Highway 2 (NE Sunset Boulevard) in 1958–1959,  comprising most of the Potential Sunset Terrace Redevelopment Subarea. Authorized on June 28,  1958, and completed in 1959, Sunset Terrace consisted of a complex of 100 low‐income housing  units consisting of both one‐ and two‐story structures arranged along curvilinear streets  (Associated Press 1958:1; King County Department of Assessments 2010; The Seattle Times  1959:44). It was constructed by Seattle‐based Dahlgren Construction Company and designed by  George W. Stoddard‐Huggard & Associates (George W. Stoddard‐Huggard & Associates 1958; The  Seattle Times 1959:44). George W. Stoddard, a prominent Seattle architect and principal of the firm, is credited with the  design of many well known public, private, and civic structures in the Seattle area. Stoddard  graduated from the University of Illinois in 1917. After serving in World War I, he joined his father’s  architectural firm in Seattle and later went on to create his own firm, George W. Stoddard &  Associates (The Seattle Times 1960:32; The Seattle Times 1967:16). In 1955, Stoddard brought on  partner Francis E. Huggard and renamed the firm George W. Stoddard‐Huggard & Associates,  Architect and Engineers (The Seattle Times 1967:16). Stoddard built such noted structures as the  High School Memorial Stadium, the Green Lake Aqua Theater, and the Yesler Terrace Defense  Housing Project (Elenga 2007:48, 230; Ochsner 1998:208, 352; The Seattle Times 1967:16).  Stoddard retired in 1960, and the Sunset Terrace public housing complex is believed to have been  one of his last commissions (The Seattle Times 1960:32).  Stoddard’s design for Sunset Terrace appears to have been strongly influenced by the Garden City  movement and exhibits features and characteristics of garden style apartments. All 27 buildings  were arranged along curvilinear streets in locations to best take advantage of the original  topography and create open, pleasing landscapes for residents. Throughout Sunset Terrace, each  building is separated by open courtyard areas with outdoor space dedicated to each housing unit. At  the rear of each unit, this space was originally identified by unit‐specific metal revolving  clotheslines. Additional design features included minimal ornamentation, aluminum windows, and  varied exterior wall cladding of horizontal rustic cedar siding, vertical rough cedar channel siding, or  resawn split cedar shake with some brick veneer.  RHA completed a comprehensive rehabilitation of Sunset Terrace in the 1970s, which resulted in the  removal and replacement of many of these features. The original windows were replaced with new  metal windows, unit doors were replaced, the revolving clotheslines were removed, and the original  cedar wall claddings were replaced with vinyl siding. Subsequent changes occurred in the early  1990s, when the single‐level, ground‐related units in the complex were upgraded for ADA  City of Renton  Environmental and Cultural Setting   Cultural Resources Survey Report—Potential Sunset Terrace  Redevelopment Subarea and NE Sunset Boulevard 2‐7 October 2010 ICF 00593.10   accessibility. Kitchens and bathrooms in the individual housing units were also substantially  renovated at this time.      Cultural Resources Survey Report—Potential Sunset Terrace  Redevelopment Subarea and NE Sunset Boulevard 3‐1 October 2010 ICF 00593.10   Chapter 3  Literature Review and Consultation  Existing Data and Background Data  Records Research  A record search was conducted using the Washington Information System for Architectural and  Archaeological Records Database (WISAARD) to identify previously documented archaeological,  ethnographic, and historic resources within 1 mile of the APE. WISAARD contains all records and  reports on file with DAHP recorded since 1995. No previously completed cultural resources studies  and no previously documented archaeological sites are located in the APE. Only one historic  resource, the building at 2615 NE Sunset Boulevard, was previously recorded in the APE. However,  the building’s NRHP eligibility was not previously evaluated. Ten previously completed cultural  resources surveys and one archaeological site were identified outside the APE, but within a 1‐mile  radius of its boundary. A summary of these cultural resources studies and the archaeological site is  provided in Table 1.  Table 1. Cultural Resources Surveys within 1 Mile of the Area of Potential Effects  NADB #  Authors/Year  Report Title  Description  Cultural Resources  1339887  Juell 2001  Cultural  Resources  Inventory of the  proposed  Washington Light  Lanes Project  Literature search  and windshield  survey of I‐405  corridor.  None  1352447  Bundy 2008  Interstate 405  Corridor Survey:  Phase I Interstate  5 to State Route  169  Improvements  Project  Survey of I‐405  corridor and  shovel testing.  None  1351994  Goetz 2008  Archaeological  Assessment,  Dayton Avenue  NE/NE 22nd  Street  Stormwater  System Project  Excavated a total  of six shovel  probes.  None  1353126  Chatters 2009  Recovery of Two  Early 20th  Century Graves  from Renton, WA  Exhumed remains  of young male and  older probable  female from  residential area.  Site 45KI686; NRHP  eligible, but site  completely  removed through  excavation  1348842  Hodges 2007a  Cultural  Resources  Monitoring of 20,  4 inch bore holes  None  City of Renton  Literature Review and Consultation   Cultural Resources Survey Report—Potential Sunset Terrace  Redevelopment Subarea and NE Sunset Boulevard 3‐2 October 2010 ICF 00593.10   NADB #  Authors/Year  Report Title  Description  Cultural Resources  Assessment for  the Proposed  Lowe’s of Renton  through fill. 1349666  Stipe 2007  Verizon Wireless  SEA Renton Voc‐ Tech Cellular  Tower Cultural  Resources Review  Records search  and pedestrian  archaeological  survey  None  1349929  Miss 2007  Archaeological  Monitoring for  the South Lake  Washington  Roadway  Improvement  Project  Monitoring of  excavated  trenches.  None  1349789  Hodges 2007b  Archaeological  Resource  Assessment for  the South Lake  Washington  Roadway  Improvement  Project  29 backhoe  trenches  excavated through  fill.  None  1340681  Cooper 2001  Antennas on an  Existing  Transmission  Tower 12612  Southeast 96th  Street  Survey around  footprint of  transmission  tower and one  shovel test.  None  NADB = National Archaeological Database  There is one known archaeological site within a 1‐mile radius of the APE. Site 45KI686, known as  the Henry Moses Aquatic Center Site, contains two Hunter‐fisher‐gatherer hearth features likely  short‐term campsites. These features were inadvertently discovered while constructing the aquatic  center; the site was fully excavated in June of 2003 by Larson Anthropological Archaeological  Services Limited. Feature 1 was a shallow basin hearth that contained charred wood, burned earth,  and fragments of hazelnut shell. Charcoal samples taken from feature 1 came back with a corrected  date of 291BP. The presence of Hazelnut shells suggests a fall use for Feature 1. Feature 2, had been  almost completely removed by the excavation of a swimming pool prior to data recovery. Twenty‐ two pieces of FMR were recovered from feature 2, however there was insufficient charcoal for a  radiocarbon sample and no mammal bone, fish bone, or other plant remains were identified.  (Kaehler 2004)    Cultural Resources Survey Report—Potential Sunset Terrace  Redevelopment Subarea and NE Sunset Boulevard 4‐1 October 2010 ICF 00593.10   Chapter 4  Research Design  Objectives and Expectations  Review of existing archaeological records within 1 mile of the Planned Action Study Area reveals  that all known archaeological sites are located in areas for which the geomorphology indicates a  high probability for containing pre contact archaeological sites (e.g., floodplains and lake margins).  In contrast, the APE itself is located on a glacial till plain, which has a low probability for pre contact  archaeological sites. Precontact archaeological sites on upland terraces tend to be very old relative  to valley floor sites, and contain lithic artifacts, with rare instances of bone or plant remains.  Analysis of previous geologic research within the project APE reveals that sediments deposited  during the Pleistocene epoch should be encountered at or near the modern ground surface in areas  that have not been modified in the historic or modern period. Since there is only evidence for human  occupation in the Puget Sound area during the Holocene epoch, all cultural materials should be  encountered on or just below ground surface in areas that have not been modified during the  historic or modern period, or at the fill/naturally deposited sediment interface in areas that have  been filled during the historic and modern period.   Given the examination of the existing archaeological and geologic information, the likelihood for  encountering prehistoric archaeological sites was considered very low. It was expected that any  precontact archaeological sites encountered during archaeological investigations would be surface  lithic scatters. If topsoil has been removed, then it was also expected that no archaeological  materials would be encountered.  Research Methods  Archaeological Investigations  ICF archaeologists conducted a cultural resources survey of the APE, using standard DAHP‐accepted  methods appropriate for finding and recording cultural resources. The field survey included walking  transects across the APE and excavating shovel tests to find exposed and buried archaeological  deposits and historic features. The purpose of this survey was to identify any visible archaeological  materials and to characterize the vertical extent of the APE. Shovel test pits (50 centimeter [cm]  diameter) were excavated in areas not covered in asphalt, concrete, buildings, or other features. The  pits were excavated to the depth of Pleistocene sediments or dense gravel deposits of obstructing  rocks, when encountered. In some shovel tests, excavations exceeded the depth of Pleistocene  sediments. These units were excavated to confirm that Pleistocene sediments had not been  redeposited over younger Holocene aged sediments. All shovel tests were excavated by hand and  sediments screened through 6‐millimeter (0.25‐inch) mesh hardware cloth. Upon completion of  excavation, shovel tests were photographed using a digital camera and backfilled.   Representative photographs are presented at the end of this document. Shovel tests were mapped  using a Trimble GeoXH global positioning system (GPS) unit.   City of Renton  Research Design   Cultural Resources Survey Report—Potential Sunset Terrace  Redevelopment Subarea and NE Sunset Boulevard 4‐2 October 2010 ICF 00593.10   Historical Resources Survey  The historic resources survey involved examining and photographing buildings and structures in  the APE determined to be 45 years of age or older. ICF senior architectural historian, Christopher  Hetzel, MA, conducted the survey and reviewed all properties in the APE to determine their  eligibility for listing in the NRHP. Construction dates were established using data from the King  County Tax Assessor, original construction drawings for the Renton Sunset public housing project,  and based on visual inspection. Properties built before 1965 were identified and information was  collected about their physical characteristics. The data collected included one or more photographs  of each property from the public right‐of‐way, the architectural style of each resource (if  identifiable), the type and materials of significant features, and the existence of alterations and  overall physical integrity.   Properties identified as 45 years of age or older were evaluated to determine their eligibility for  listing in the NRHP and recorded in the Washington State Historic Property Inventory Database, per  DAHP reporting standards. Printed record forms for each property are provided in Appendix B of  this report.       Cultural Resources Survey Report—Potential Sunset Terrace  Redevelopment Subarea and NE Sunset Boulevard 5‐1 October 2010 ICF 00593.10   Chapter 5  Results  Archaeological Investigations  On October 7, 2010, ICF archaeologists J. Tait Elder, MA, and Patrick Reed conducted an  archaeological investigation of the APE. The investigation included a pedestrian survey across the  entire APE and 12 shovel tests in areas that were not obscured by concrete or asphalt, or where  buried utilities were present (Figure 3).  NE Sunset Boulevard Right‐of‐Way  A windshield survey was conducted in the commercially developed areas along NE Sunset  Boulevard, within the APE. The survey indicated that much of the ground surface had been paved for  use as roadways, sidewalks, or parking lots.   No shovel tests were conducted in this area, because concrete and asphalt paving covered nearly all  the ground surface or buried utility lines were present.  Edmonds‐Glenwood Lot  A pedestrian survey was performed in this area, although ground visibility was obscured by  extensive surface vegetation consisting of grasses and blackberry.   Shovel tests excavated at the Edmonds‐Glenwood Lot revealed gravelly silty sand, ranging from  loose to moderate compaction that increased with depth. A weakly developed A‐horizon is present  in the first 20 cm, which shows indications of disturbance. Modern refuse, as well as a single historic  artifact, were encountered in disturbed sedimentary context. These objects included flat glass, safety  glass, one vessel glass fragment, wire nails and one cut (square) nail.   Harrington Lot  A pedestrian survey was performed in this area, although ground visibility was obscured by surface  vegetation consisting of grasses.   Shovel tests excavated at the Harrington lot revealed deposits of gravely silty sand that had been  overlain by imported gravelly sandy fill, which had developed multiple A‐horizons from between  filling events. Amber and clear glass fragments were observed in the imported sand fill. ST#8  encountered sandy fill usually associated with buried utilities, and was terminated at 45 cm below  surface.  Sunset Terrace Public Housing Complex  A pedestrian survey was performed in this area, although ground visibility was obscured by  extensive surface vegetation consisting of grasses and constructed components consisting of  sidewalks and buildings.  City of Renton  Results   Cultural Resources Survey Report—Potential Sunset Terrace  Redevelopment Subarea and NE Sunset Boulevard 5‐2 October 2010 ICF 00593.10   Shovel tests excavated at the Sunset Terrace complex revealed no historic or modern cultural  materials. ST#11 contained gravelly silty sand underlain by sterile laminated sands below 52 cm.  Weathered glacial till was encountered at 24 cm below surface in ST#12. No other shovel tests  contained sediments that were identified as glacial till.   Summary of Shovel Tests  A total of 12 shovel tests were excavated in the APE, specifically within the Edmonds‐Glenwood Lot  (five tests), the Harrington Lot (five tests), and Sunset Terrace public housing complex (two tests)  (Figure 3). Table 2 below provides a summary of these 12 test pits, including their location and  results.  Figure 3 Shovel Test Locations and Historic Resources Survey Results Cultural Resources Survey Report00593.10/GIS - Revised: 10/25/2010Shovel TestNRHP EligibleNot NRHP EligibleEdmonds-Glennwood LotHarrington LotSunset Terrace Public Housing ComplexArea of Potential Effects 0 250 500125 Feet 0 100 20050 Meters 1:5,500 Source: King County NAIP (2009), USDA City of Renton  Results   Cultural Resources Survey Report—Potential Sunset Terrace  Redevelopment Subarea and NE Sunset Boulevard 5‐4 October 2010 ICF 00593.10    Table 2. Shovel Test Data  ST  Depth  Width  Soil Description   Comments  Location  1  45  100  0–17 cm: Brown gravelly silty  sand, loose compaction, few  small roots.   17–65 cm: Reddish brown  gravelly silty sand, loose  compaction moderately loose  compaction, less silt than  above.   65–100 cm: Olive brown  gravelly silty sand, loose  compaction  0–17 cm: A‐horizon formed in  recessional glacial outwash,  disturbed, developed weakly  partial removal from  grubbing, contained flat glass,  safety glass, vessel glass,  square nail  17–65 cm: B‐horizon in  recessional glacial outwash   65–100 cm: recessional  outwash  Edmond‐ Glenwood  Lot  2  45  115  0–21 cm: Brown gravelly silty  sand, loose compaction, few  small roots.  21–62 cm: Red sediment,  mixed and mottled w/  abundant burned wood  62–115 cm: Olive grey gravelly  silty sand  0–21 cm: A‐horizon,  disturbed  21–62 cm: B‐horizon,  disturbed, abundant burned  wood  62–115 cm: Recessional  outwash  Edmond‐ Glenwood  Lot  3  42  64  0–14 cm: Mixed and disturbed  silty gravelly sand  14–64 cm: Reddish brown silty  gravelly sand, increasing  gravels with depth  64–68 cm: Olive grey gravelly  silty sand  0–14 mixed A and B horizons  in outwash    Edmond‐ Glenwood  Lot  4  43  58  0–18 cm: Brown gravely silty  sand   18–43 cm: Reddish brown silty  gravelly sand loose to  moderate compaction  543–58 cm: Olive grey to  brown gravelly silty sand  0–18 cm: A‐horizon in  outwash  18–43 cm: B‐horizon in  outwash  43–58 cm: outwash  Edmond‐ Glenwood  Lot  5  42  56  0–30 cm: Mixed and disturbed  reddish brown silty gravelly  sand loose compaction  30–52 cm: Intact reddish  brown gravelly silty sand,  moderate  compaction  52–58 cm: Olive grey gravelly  silty sand  0–30 cm: Brick and concrete  fragments  30–52 cm: B‐horizon in  recessional outwash  52–58 cm: Recessional  outwash  Edmond‐ Glenwood  Lot  City of Renton  Results   Cultural Resources Survey Report—Potential Sunset Terrace  Redevelopment Subarea and NE Sunset Boulevard 5‐5 October 2010 ICF 00593.10   ST  Depth  Width  Soil Description   Comments  Location  6  43  82  0–23 cm: Gravelly sand fill,  dense compaction  23–51 cm: Reddish brown fine  sand w/ occ. Rounded  granules  51–82 cm: Olive grey gravelly  silty sand  0–23 cm: Occ. brown and  clear bottle glass  23–51 cm: B‐horizon in  outwash  51–82 cm: Intact glacial  outwash   Harrington  Lot  7  42  109  0–13 cm: Brown sand, loose  compaction  13–88 cm: Reddish brown fine  to moderate pebbly sand, loose  compaction  88–109 cm: Olive grey gravelly  silty sand  0–13 cm: A‐horizon  36–60 cm: black sooty sand  lenses w/rootlets, root burn  88–109 cm: outwash  Harrington  Lot  8  42  45  0–40 cm: Mixed reddish brown  imported gravelly sandy silt  40–45 cm: Medium varigated  sand  0–40 cm: Fill, plastic and  glass fragments  40–45 cm: Utility line fill  Harrington  Lot  9  43  119  0–14 cm: Brown gravelly sand  14–20 cm: Mixed tanish brown  and reddish brown sand  20–30 cm: Brown gravelly  sand  30–56 cm: Reddish brown  gravelly sand, loose to  moderate compaction   56–79 cm: Grayish brown  sand, few pebbles  79–94 cm: Moderate  compacted brown sand with  few charcoal flecks,   94–119 cm: Loose to  moderately compacted reddish  brown sand  0–14 cm: A‐horizon  20–30 cm: Buried A horizon,  plastic, glass   30–56 cm: Imported fill   79–94 cm: Buried A‐horizon  94–119 cm: B‐horizon in  outwash  Harrington  Lot  10  45  120  0–25 cm: Mixed reddish brown  gravelly sand  25–30 cm: Very dark brown  silty sand  30–84 cm: Reddish brown silty  sand  84–87 cm: Dark brown silty  fine sand  87–120 cm: Reddish brown  silty fin sand  0–25 cm: Imported fill, plastic  and glass fragments  25–30 cm: A‐horizon in fill  30–84 cm: fill  84–87 cm: A‐horizon in  outwash  87–120 cm: B‐horizon in  outwash  Harrington  Lot  11  41  88  0–19 cm: Brown Gravelly silty  sand  19–52 cm: Gravelly silty sand  52–88 cm: Grey laminated  sands  0–19 cm: A‐horizon with  clear contact possible cut and  fill,  19–52 cm: B‐horizon with  graded contact  52–88 cm: Sterile   Sunset  Terrace  complex  City of Renton  Results   Cultural Resources Survey Report—Potential Sunset Terrace  Redevelopment Subarea and NE Sunset Boulevard 5‐6 October 2010 ICF 00593.10   ST  Depth  Width  Soil Description   Comments  Location  12  43  25  0–25 cm: Brown gravelly silty  sand, few rootlets  25+ cm: Compacted weathered  till  0–25 cm: A‐horizon  25+ cm: Weathered glacial till  Sunset  Terrace  complex  ST = shovel test  Historic Resources Survey  The reconnaissance‐level historic resources survey revealed the presence of 70 developed  properties in the APE. Fifty‐one of these properties contain resources that are 45 years of age or  older (Table 3; Figure 3). One of these properties, the building at 2615 NE Sunset Boulevard, was  previously recorded in the Washington Historic Property Inventory Database. However, the  building’s NRHP eligibility was not previously evaluated. All of the other properties in the APE  contain buildings and/or structures that are less than 45 years old (Table 4).   All 51 properties identified as 45 years of age or older were evaluated to determine their eligibility  for listing in the NRHP. Based on NRHP criteria for evaluation (36 CFR 60.4), only one of the  identified properties in the APE appears to be eligible for listing in the NRHP. The building at 2825  NE Sunset Boulevard was identified during the historic resources survey as possibly eligible for the  NRHP.  City of Renton  Results   Cultural Resources Survey Report—Potential Sunset Terrace  Redevelopment Subarea and NE Sunset Boulevard 5‐7 October 2010 ICF 00593.10   Table 3. Properties in Area of Potential Effects Identified as 45 Years of Age or Older  Address  Tax Parcel #  Year Built  NRHP Evaluation  2707 NE 10th St  7227801085  1959  Not Eligible  2715 NE 10th St  7227801085  1959  Not Eligible  2624 NE 9th Pl  7227500530  1959  Not Eligible  2630 NE 9th Pl  7227500540  1959  Not Eligible  1012 Edmonds Ave NE  0923059119  1948  Not Eligible  1024 Edmonds Ave NE  0923059086  1954  Not Eligible  1100–1110 Edmonds   Ave NE  923059161  1964  Not Eligible  1007 Glenwood Ave NE  7227801400  1959  Not Eligible  1011 Glenwood Ave NE  7227801400  1959  Not Eligible  1052 Glenwood Ave NE  7227801305  1943  Not Eligible  1060 Glenwood Ave NE  7227801310  1943  Not Eligible  1139 Glenwood Ave NE  7227801380  1943  Not Eligible  965 Harrington Ave NE  7227801055  1959  Not Eligible  966 Harrington Ave NE  7227801055  1959  Not Eligible  970 Harrington Ave NE  7227801085  1959  Not Eligible  975 Harrington Ave NE  7227801400  1959  Not Eligible  984 Harrington Ave NE  7227801085  1959  Not Eligible  1067 Harrington Ave NE  7227801300  1943  Not Eligible  1073 Harrington Ave NE  7227801295  1943  Not Eligible  1409 Monroe Ave NE  423059104  1942  Not Eligible  1417 Monroe Ave NE  423059104  1935  Not Eligible  2502 NE Sunset Blvd  923059058  1943  Not Eligible  2615 NE Sunset Blvd  7227500550  1958  Not Eligible  2621 NE Sunset Blvd  7227500550  1959  Not Eligible  2725 NE Sunset Blvd  7227801026  1964  Not Eligible  2800 NE Sunset Blvd  7227801201  1959  Not Eligible  2808–2832 NE Sunset Blvd  7227801205  1962  Not Eligible  2809 NE Sunset Blvd  7227900091  1959  Not Eligible 2825 NE Sunset Blvd  7227900094  1964  Eligible 2832–2844 NE Sunset Blvd  7227801205  1958  Not Eligible  2902 NE Sunset Blvd  7227801205  1958  Not Eligible  3309 NE Sunset Blvd  423059104  1933  Not Eligible 11905 NE Sunset Blvd  0823059111  1964  Not Eligible  2601 Sunset Ln NE  7227801400  1959  Not Eligible 2605 Sunset Ln NE  7227801055  1959  Not Eligible 2606 Sunset Ln NE  7227801055  1959  Not Eligible 2611 Sunset Ln NE  7227801055  1959  Not Eligible 2612 Sunset Ln NE  7227801055  1959  Not Eligible 2617 Sunset Ln NE  7227801055  1959  Not Eligible 2620 Sunset Ln NE  7227801055  1959  Not Eligible City of Renton  Results   Cultural Resources Survey Report—Potential Sunset Terrace  Redevelopment Subarea and NE Sunset Boulevard 5‐8 October 2010 ICF 00593.10   Address  Tax Parcel #  Year Built  NRHP Evaluation  2623 Sunset Ln NE  7227801055  1959  Not Eligible 2629 Sunset Ln NE  7227801055  1959  Not Eligible 2630 Sunset Ln NE  7227801055  1959  Not Eligible 2635 Sunset Ln NE  7227801055  1959  Not Eligible 2641 Sunset Ln NE  7227801055  1959  Not Eligible 2644 Sunset Ln NE  7227801055  1959  Not Eligible 2647 Sunset Ln NE  7227801055  1959  Not Eligible 2711 Sunset Ln NE  7227801055  1959  Not Eligible 2717 Sunset Ln NE  7227801055  1959  Not Eligible 2720 Sunset Ln NE  7227801055  1959  Not Eligible 2723 Sunset Ln NE  7227801085  1959  Not Eligible Table 4. Properties in Area of Potential Effects Identified as Less than 45 Years Old  Address  Tax Parcel #  Year Built  NRHP Evaluation  1170 NE Sunset Blvd  0823059203  1966  Less than 45 years  2705 NE Sunset Blvd  7227801025  1976  Less than 45 years  2801 NE Sunset Blvd  7227900090  1987  Less than 45 years  2806 NE Sunset Blvd  7227801205  1982  Less than 45 years  2809 NE Sunset Blvd  89000010  1971  Less than 45 years  2813 NE Sunset Blvd  7227900096  1970  Less than 45 years  2833 NE Sunset Blvd  7227900095  1981  Less than 45 years  2950 NE Sunset Blvd  7227801206  1972  Less than 45 years  3000 NE Sunset Blvd  7227900020, 7227900015,  7227900019, 7227900018,  7227900021  2003  Less than 45 years  3002 NE Sunset Blvd  7227800285  1992  Less than 45 years  3005 NE Sunset Blvd  7227900016  1979  Less than 45 years  3116 NE Sunset Blvd  423059095  2000  Less than 45 years  3123 NE Sunset Blvd  423059155  2000  Less than 45 years  3155 NE Sunset Blvd  423059096  1982  Less than 45 years  3160 NE Sunset Blvd  423059080  1977  Less than 45 years  3208 NE Sunset Blvd  423059153  1978  Less than 45 years  3213 NE Sunset Blvd  423059317  1977  Less than 45 years  3217 NE Sunset Blvd  423059127  1980  Less than 45 years  3241 NE Sunset Blvd  423059145  1983  Less than 45 years    Cultural Resources Survey Report—Potential Sunset Terrace  Redevelopment Subarea and NE Sunset Boulevard 6‐1 October 2010 ICF 00593.10   Chapter 6  Analysis and National Register of Historic  PlacesEvaluation  Environmental Analysis  The shape and composition of the landforms within the project APE is largely the result of  depositional events that occurred during the Pleistocene epoch, as well as modern land  modifications. During the late Pleistocene (14,000 and 11,000 BP), advancing and retreating  continental glacial ice deposited and compacted unsorted sediments, known as glacial till, in their  wake. As glaciers retreated, large volumes of meltwater deposited massive and laminated silty sands  with occasional gravels on the surface. Other than surface removal and filling associated with the  construction of the existing Sunset Terrace public housing complex and other modern development,  no sedimentary depositional or removal events has occurred within the project APE since the end of  the Pleistocene epoch.   Once sediment deposition within the project APE ceased, soil formation occurred within the APE.  This formation is a weathering process that acts upon sediments exposed at the ground surface.  Identification of soil development indicators is an important tool for identifying buried surfaces,  understanding landscape modification over time, and determining the potential depth of  bioturbation. The process of soil formation typically results in the creation of several distinctive  zones, or “soil horizons.” The topmost of these zones is commonly known as topsoil, or “A” horizon.  The underlying soils may vary depending on climatic and sedimentary factors, but is commonly a  “B” horizon in the Pacific Northwest. A “B” horizon is characterized by the presence of an underlying  parent sediment mixed with an accumulation of leached minerals from the overlying “A” horizon.  The mixture of these sediments tends to give the “B” horizon a color that differs from the  unweathered parent material.  Archaeological excavations at the Edmonds‐Glenwood Lot revealed that the majority of the surface  within the parcel has been modified through mixture and removal of the native “A” horizon. The  western half of the lot had been recently scraped, which was indicated by the total absence of  vegetation and an “A” horizon at the surface in some areas, and heavily mixed “A” and “B” horizons  in others. While a well developed “A” horizon has formed on the eastern half of the lot, modern  debris (plastic, safety glass, nails) were identified throughout, likely indicating both sediment  disturbance, and bioturbation. Throughout the parcel, an intact “B” horizon was identified below  surface. The sediments in which the “B” horizon formed consist of moderately compacted gravelly  silty sand, indicating its likely origin as glacial outwash rather than glacial till. Since the sediments  within which soil formation occurred were deposited during the Pleistocene epoch, a period for  which there is no record of human occupation in the Puget Sound, excavations were terminated  once an intact “B” horizon was encountered. Because all visible surface within the lot have been  modified, archaeological excavations revealed mixed or absent “A” horizon, and there are  Pleistocene age sediments just below ground surface, the likelihood of discovering intact cultural  resources at the Edmonds‐Glenwood Lot is considered very low, and even then only on or just below  the surface.  City of Renton   Analysis and National Register of Historic  PlacesEvaluation   Cultural Resources Survey Report—Potential Sunset Terrace  Redevelopment Subarea and NE Sunset Boulevard 6‐2 October 2010 ICF 00593.10   Archaeological excavations at the Harrington Lot revealed that two discrete modern fill events have  occurred on the property. The most recent fill event ranged in depth from 13 to 40 cm below surface  and consisted of brown gravelly sandy silt with occasional glass and metal fragments. An older fill  event, which was composed of silty sand with occasional gravels, had been exposed long enough  prior to having additional fill deposited on top of it that a weak “A” and “B” horizon had formed. A  buried naturally deposited surface was encountered between 84 and 94 cm below surface.  Underlying this surface, the sediment composition was similar to that of the undisturbed glacial  outwash identified at the Edmonds‐Glenwood Lot. Since there is a buried native surface that would  have been exposed during the Holocene epoch located within the Harrington lot, it is possible that  ground disturbing activities could encounter sediments that have the potential to contain  archaeological deposits.  The surface upon which the existing Sunset Terrace public housing complex was constructed has  been heavily disturbed. Archaeological excavations revealed a sharp contrast between the  composition of the “A” horizon and the underlying sediments. The “A” horizon was composed of  moderately compacted brown gravelly sandy silt, while underlying sediments were composed of  either moderately compacted gravelly silty sand. This sharp contrast indicates that the “A” horizon  is an imported topsoil, and that the native “A” horizon was previously removed. Examination of  grading and utilities plans from original construction drawings for the Sunset Terrace public  housing complex indicates extensive ground disturbance during the complex’s construction (George  W. Stoddard‐Huggard & Associates 1958). Given the level and extent of known disturbance, the  absence of a native “A” horizon, and the presence of Pleistocene age sediments just below ground  surface, there is no potential for buried archaeological sites within the area of the Sunset Terrace  Public housing complex. Extensive concrete and asphalt, as well as buried utilities, prevented  archaeological excavations along NE Sunset Boulevard.  National Register of Historic PlacesEvaluation  Only one potentially NHRP eligible property was identified in the APE, consisting of the existing  building at 2825 NE Sunset Boulevard. No other significant cultural resources were identified in the  APE. The building at 2825 NE Sunset Boulevard, constructed in 1964, is an excellent example of a  1960s era supermarket designed in the Modern style, has good integrity, and is likely the design of a  master architect. It is considered eligible for the NRHP under criterion C at the local level of  significance because it embodies the distinctive characteristics of a type and style of construction  and may represent the work of a master.  None of the other identified resources in the APE are considered NRHP eligible. The Sunset Terrace  public housing complex resulted from federal investment in public housing during the postwar  period and is associated with a well‐known Seattle architect. However, it is a late example of its  architectural type and its individual elements were substantially altered by rehabilitations in the  1970s and 1990s, such that they no longer appear to retain sufficient integrity to convey their  historical significance. The other individual buildings and residences in the APE do not appear to  embody characteristics or a method of construction that would warrant special recognition and are  not known to be associated with known event or person of particular significance.    Cultural Resources Survey Report—Potential Sunset Terrace  Redevelopment Subarea and NE Sunset Boulevard 7‐1 October 2010 ICF 00593.10   Chapter 7  Conclusions and Recommendations  Conclusions  Only one significant cultural resource was identified within the APE. The building at 2825 NE Sunset  Boulevard is recommended as NRHP eligible under criterion C at the local level of significance. No  other significant historic resources were identified.  No archaeological sites were identified during the archaeological survey of the APE. Archaeological  excavations revealed mixed, imported, or absent sediments or soils that would have the potential to  contain archaeological resources at the Edmonds‐Glenwood Lot and throughout the Sunset Terrace  public housing complex. Concrete and asphalt also covered much of the ground surface along NE  Sunset Boulevard. At the Harrington Lot buried native “A” horizon sediment was identified between  84 and 94 cm below the surface. This sediment is considered a buried native surface, which would  have been exposed during the Holocene epoch. Because it is located within the APE at this location,  ground disturbing activities could potentially encounter sediments containing archaeological  deposits when excavations occur on the parcel. The potential for the discovery of archaeological  deposits in the rest of the APE is considered very low.  Based on the cultural resources investigations, the proposed undertaking would not impact any  known NRHP‐eligible archaeological or historic resources in the APE, and the likelihood of  impacting unknown cultural resources is considered low. The potentially NRHP‐eligible building at  2825 NE Sunset Boulevard would not be affected by the undertaking. Due to the physical separation  of the property from NE Sunset Boulevard and the public right‐of‐way, the undertaking would have  no direct changes on the building and the property’s physical setting likely would be minimal.  Recommendations  Since no native “A” horizon was identified at the Edmonds‐Glenwood Lot and throughout the Sunset  Terrace public housing complex, no further archaeological investigations are recommended for  these areas. Although a buried, native “A” horizon was identified on the Harrington lot, the potential  for an archaeological discovery is very low. Therefore, it is recommended that the project proceed  with no further archaeological investigations. If archaeological materials are discovered during  ground disturbing excavations, it is recommended that the contractor halts excavations in the  vicinity of the find and contact DAHP. For DAHP contact information, see Unanticipated Discovery  Plan in Appendix C.   If human skeletal remains are discovered, the King County Sheriff and DAHP should be notified  immediately. If during excavation archaeological materials are uncovered, the proponent shall  immediately stop work and notify the City, DAHP, and affected Indian tribes, as outlined in the  Unanticipated Discovery Plan provided in Appendix C.          Cultural Resources Survey Report—Potential Sunset Terrace  Redevelopment Subarea and NE Sunset Boulevard 8‐1 October 2010 ICF 00593.10   Chapter 8  References  Ames, K. M. and D. G. Maschner  1999  Peoples of the Northwest Coast: Their Archaeology and Prehistory. London: Thames &  Hudson.  Associated Press  1958  Tacoma Gets Housing Blues; To Renton It’s Not News. The Seattle Times. June 29. Seattle,  Washington.  Blukis Onat, A. R., M. E. Morgenstein, P. D. LeTourneau, R. P. Stone, J. Kosta, and P. Johnson  2001  Archaeological Investigations at stuwe'yuqw—Site 45KI464—Tolt River, King County,  Washington. BOAS, Inc., Seattle, WA.  Blukis Onat, A. R., R. A. Kiers, and P. D. LeTourneau  2005 Preliminary Ethnographic and Geoarchaeological Study of the SR 520 Bridge Replacement  and HOV Project. Report on file at Washington State Department of Transportation, Seattle,  WA.  Blukis Onat, A. R. and R. A. Kiers  2007 Ethnohistoric and Geoarchaeological Study of the SR 520 Corridor and Archaeological  Field Investigations in the SR 520 Bridge Replacement and HOV Project including the Pacific  Interchange and Second Montlake Bridge Option, King County, Washington. Report on file at  Washington State Department of Transportation, Seattle, WA.  The Boeing Company, Renton Reporter, and City of Renton  2001 Renton: The First Hundred Years, 1901–2001. King County Journal Newspaper, Kent,  Washington.  Booth, D. B., K. G. Troost, and S. A. Schimel  2009  Geologic Map of Northeastern Seattle (Part of the Seattle North 7.5’x15’ Quadrangle),  King County, Washington. U.S. Department of the Interior, U.S. Geological Survey, Reston,  Virginia.  Buchanan, James  1859  Treaty between the United States and the Duwamish, Suquamish, and Other Allied and  Subordinate Tribes of Indians in Washington Territory: January 22, 1855, ratified April 11,  1859. Available:  <http://content.lib.washington.edu/cdm4/document.php?CISOROOT=/lctext&CISOPTR=15 92&REC=16>. Accessed October 12, 2010.  Buerge, David M.  1989 Renton: Where the Water Took Wing. Chatsworth, California: Windsor Publications, Inc.  Bundy, Barbara E.  2008   Interstate 405 Corridor Survey: Phase I Interstate 5 to State Route 169 Improvements  Project. Report No. 08‐23, Cultural Resources Program. Seattle, WA. Prepared by  Washington State Department of Transportation, Environmental Services Office.  City of Renton  References   Cultural Resources Survey Report—Potential Sunset Terrace  Redevelopment Subarea and NE Sunset Boulevard 8‐2 October 2010 ICF 00593.10     Chambers, Sir Theodore  1902  Forward. In Garden Cities of Tomorrow. Ebenezer Howard. N.p. London: Swan  Sonnenschein & Co., Ltd.  Chatters, James  2009 Recovery of Two Early 20th Century Graves from Renton, Washington. AMEC Project No.  8‐915‐16415‐0. Bothell, WA. Prepared for James H. Jacques Construction by AMEC Earth &  Environmental, Inc.  City of Renton Department of Community Development, Long Range Planning Section  1989 Community Profile. Renton Department of Community Development, Renton,  Washington.  Cooper, Jason  2001 Antennas on an Existing Transmission Tower 12612 Southeast 96th Street. SE54XC005A.  Bellevue, WA. Prepared by Jones & Stokes Associates, Inc.  Dalquest, W.W.   1948 The Mammals of Washington. Lawrence, KS: University of Kansas Press.  Duwamish Tribe  2010   “Culture and History.”Available: <http://www.duwamishtribe.org/index.html>.  Accessed: October 18, 2010  Easterbrook, D. J.   2003  Cordilleran Ice Sheet Glaciation of the Puget Lowland and Columbia Plateau and Alpine  Glaciation of the North Cascade range, Washington. Pages 137–157 in T.W. Swanson (ed.),  Western Cordillera and Adjacent Areas. Boulder, CO: The Geological Society of America.  Elenga, Maureen R.  2007 Seattle Architecture: A Walking Guide to Downtown. Seattle, WA: Seattle Architecture  Foundation.  Forsman, L. and D. Lewarch  2001  Archaeology of the White River. White River Journal: A Newsletter of the White River  Valley Museum. April. Available: <http://www. wrvmuseum.org/journal/journal_  0401.htm>. Accessed: July 25, 2006.  Franklin, J. F. and C. T. Dyrness  1988 Natural Vegetation of Oregon and Washington. Corvallis, OR: Oregon State University  Press.   George W. Stoddard–Huggard & Associates  1958  Housing Authority of the City of Renton: Project Washington II‐I, Renton Highlands,  Renton, Washington. Construction Plans. George W. Stoddard‐Huggard & Associates  Architects & Engineers, Seattle, WA. On file with Renton Housing Authority, Renton, WA.  Goetz, Linda Naoi, Kara M. Kanaby, Douglas F. Tingwall, and Thomas C. Rust  2008  Dayton Avenue NE/NE 22nd Street Stormwater System Project, Renton, Washington.  Seattle, WA. Prepared by Landau Associates for BHC Consultants.  City of Renton  References   Cultural Resources Survey Report—Potential Sunset Terrace  Redevelopment Subarea and NE Sunset Boulevard 8‐3 October 2010 ICF 00593.10   Golder Associates  1996 Geotechnical Engineering Study N.E. Sunset Boulevard Harrington Avenue N.E. to Union  Avenue N.E. Sewer Interceptor Project, Renton, Washington. May 7. Prepared for the City of  Renton, WA.  2003 Final Report on Preliminary Geotechnical Investigation Renton Sunset Interceptor Phase  II, Renton, Washington. September 2. Prepared for HDR Engineering, Inc.  Greengo, R. E. and R. Houston  1970  Archaeological Excavations at Marymoor Farm. Department of Anthropology,       University of Washington, Seattle.  Hanchett, Thomas W.  2000  The Other “Subsidized Housing”: Federal Aid to Suburbanization, 1940–1960s. Pp. 163– 179 in John F. Bauman, Roger Biles, Kristin M. Szylvian (eds.), From Tenements to the Taylor  Homes; In Search of an Urban Housing Policy in Twentieth­Century American. University Park,  PA: Pennsylvania State University.  Hilbert et al.   2001 Ways of the Lushootseed People Ceremonies & Traditions of North Puget Sound First  People, Third Edition. Seattle, WA: Lushootseed Press.  Hodges, Charles M.  2007a Cultural Resources Assessment for the Proposed Lowe’s of Renton Project, Renton, King  County, Washington. NWAA Report Number WA 07‐014. Seattle, WA. Prepared for PacLand  by Northwest Archaeological Associates, Inc.  2007b Archaeological Resource Assessment for the South Lake Washington Roadway  Improvement Project, City of Renton, King County, Washington. NWAA Report Number WA06‐ 055. Seattle, WA. Prepared for the City of Renton by Northwest Archaeological Associates,  Inc.  Howard, Ebenezer  1902 Garden Cities of Tomorrow. London: Swan Sonnenschein & Co., Ltd.  Juell, Ken  2001 Cultural Resources Inventory of the Proposed Washington Light Rails Project. NWAA  Report WA01‐6. Seattle, WA. Prepared by Northwest Archaeological Associates, Inc.  Kaehler, Gretchen A., et. al.  2004  Data Recovery Excavations at the Henry Moses Aquatic Center Site (45KI686), Renton,  King County, Washington. LAAS Technical Report #2003‐09. Prepared for Community  Services, City of Renton, by Larson Anthropological Archaeological Services Limited. Gig  Harbor, WA.  Karolak, Eric J.  2000  No Idea of Doing Anything Wonderful: The Labor‐Crisis Origins of National Housing  Policy and the Reconstruction of the Working‐Class Community, 1917–1919. Pages 60–80 in  John F. Bauman, Roger Biles, Kristin M. Szylvian (eds.), From Tenemants to the Taylor Homes;  In Search of an Urban Housing Policy in Twentieth­Century American. University Park, PA:  Pennsylvania State University.  City of Renton  References   Cultural Resources Survey Report—Potential Sunset Terrace  Redevelopment Subarea and NE Sunset Boulevard 8‐4 October 2010 ICF 00593.10   Kidd, R. S.  1964 A Synthesis of Western Washington Prehistory from the Prospective of Three Occupational  Sites. Unpublished A.A. thesis. Department of Anthropology. Seattle, WA: University of  Washington.  King County Department of Assessments  2010  Assessment Records for parcels 7227801055, 7227801400, and 7227801085. Available:  <http://info.kingcounty.gov/Assessor/eRealProperty/default.aspx>. Accessed: October 13,  2010.  Kopperl, R. E.  2004 Cultural Resources Clearance Survey, SR5 HOV Lane Construction, 48th Street to Pacific  Avenue, Tacoma, Pierce County. Northwest Archaeological Associates and the Environmental  History Company. On file at the Washington State Department of Archaeology and Historic  Preservation.  Larson, L. L., and D. E. Lewarch  1995 The Archaeology of West Point, Seattle, Washington: 4,000 Years of Hunter­Fisher­ Gatherer Land Use in Southern Puget Sound. Prepared by Larson  Anthropological/Archaeological Services, Seattle, WA.  Lord, Tom Forrester  1977 Decent Housing: A Promise to Keep. Federal Housing Policy and its Impact on the City.  Cambridge, MA: Schenkman Publishing Company, Inc.  Madison, Charles A.  1971  Preface. In How the Other Half Lives. Jacob A. Riis. New York, NY: Dover Publications, Inc.  Miss, Christian J.  2007  Archaeological Monitoring for the South Lake Washington Roadway Improvement  Project, City of Renton, King County, Washington. Seattle, WA. Prepared for the City of  Renton by Northwest Archaeological Associates, Inc.  Morning Olympian  1909  Survey New Renton Seattle Highway. 30 October:3. Olympia, Washington.  Mullineaux, D. R.  1965  Geologic map of the Renton Quadrangle, King County, Washington. U.S. Department of  the Interior, U.S. Geological Survey  Nelson, C. M.  1990  Prehistory of the Puget Sound Region. Pages 481–484 in Handbook of North     American Indians, Vol. 7 (Northwest Coast). Washington, D.C.: Smithsonian Institution  Ochsner, Jeffery Karl, ed.  1998 Shaping Seattle Architecture: A Historical Guide to the Architects. Seattle, WA: University  of Washington Press.  City of Renton  References   Cultural Resources Survey Report—Potential Sunset Terrace  Redevelopment Subarea and NE Sunset Boulevard 8‐5 October 2010 ICF 00593.10   Pierce, Franklin  1855  Treaty Between the United States and the Nisqually and Other Bands of Indians.  Available:  <http://content.lib.washington.edu/cdm4/document.php?CISOROOT=/lctext&CISOPTR=15 74&REC=14>. Accessed: October 12, 2010.  Rabinowitz, Alan  2004 Urban Economics and Land Use in America: The Transformation of Cities in the Twentieth  Century. M.E. Sharpe, Inc., Armonk, New York.  Renton History Museum  1975  Renton Highlands, aerial view looking west, Renton, ca. 1975. Avaialble:  <http://content.lib.washington.edu/cdm4/item_viewer.php?CISOROOT=/imlsrenton&CISO PTR=240>. Accessed: October 13, 2010.  The Seattle Times  1959  Seattle Firm Supported for Housing Job. 18 March:44. Seattle, WA.  1960  G. W. Stoddard, Architect Since 1920, to Retire. 27 March:32. Seattle, WA.  1967  Obituaries: George W. Stoddard. 29 September:16. Seattle, WA.  Slauson, Morda C.  2006 Renton From Coal to Jets. Renton Historical Society, Renton, WA.  Stipe, Frank T.  2007 Verizon Wireless SEA Renton Voc­Tech Cellular Tower Cultural Resources Review. Bothell,  WA. Prepared for Verizon Wireless by Tetra Tech Divisions, Inc.  Suttles, Wayne, and Barbara Lane  1990  "South Coast Salish". in Sturtevant, William C.. Handbook of North American Indians. 7.  Northwest coast. Washington, DC: Smithsonian Institution.  Thrush, Coll  2007 Native Seattle: Histories From the Crossing­Over Place. University of Washington Press,  Seattle, WA.              Appendix A  Correspondence      STATE OF WASHINGTON DEPARTMENT OF ARCHAEOLOGY & HISTORIC PRESERVATION 1063 S. Capitol Way, Suite 106 Olympia, Washington 98501 Mailing address: PO Box 48343 Olympia, Washington 98504-8343 (360) 586-3065 Fax Number (360) 586-3067 Website: www.dahp.wa.gov November 18, 2010 Ms. Ericka Conkling City of Renton 1055 S Grady Way Renton, WA 98057 In future correspondence please refer to: Log: 091010-31-HUD-CDBG Property: Sunset Terrace Redevelopment Subarea Re: Determined Eligible Dear Ms. Conkling: Thank you for contacting our office. I have reviewed the materials you provided to our office and we concur with your professional consultant’s opinion that the Saint Vincent De Paul Superstore is eligible to the National Register of Historic Places. We also concur that the remaining 47 historic-era properties are not eligible. I look forward to further consultation regarding your determination of effect. I would appreciate receiving any correspondence or comments from concerned tribes or other parties that you receive as you consult under the requirements of 36CFR800.4(a)(4) and the survey report when it is available. These comments are based on the information available at the time of this review and on behalf of the State Historic Preservation Officer pursuant to Section 106 of the National Historic Preservation Act and its implementing regulations 36CFR800. Thank you for the opportunity to review and comment. If you have any questions, please contact me. Sincerely, Russell Holter Project Compliance Reviewer (360) 586-3533 russell.holter@dahp.wa.gov     Appendix B  Historic Property Inventory Forms      Historic Inventory Report Thursday, October 28, 2010 Page 1 of 5 Identification Hetzel, Christopher Survey Name:Date Recorded: Field Recorder: Owner's Name:Brickshire Apts LLC 10/06/2010 City: Classification:Building Resource Status:Comments: State:Zip: Within a District?No Contributing?No National Register: Local District: National Register District/Thematic Nomination Name: Owner Address: Survey/Inventory Not Eligible Eligibility Status: Determination Date: Determination Comments: Not Determined - SHPO 1/1/0001 Sunset Terrace Redevelopment Subarea 2624 NE 9th Pl , Renton, WA 98056 Location Field Site No.DAHP No. Historic Name: Common Name:Brickshire Manor Apartments Property Address: Comments: King County T23R05E 09 Township/Range/EW Section 1/4 Sec 1/4 1/4 Sec RENTON Quadrangle Tax No./Parcel No.7227500530 Plat/Block/Lot Acreage Supplemental Map(s) Coordinate Reference Projection: Datum: Easting: Northing: HARN (feet) Washington State Plane South 1224173 794218 Historic Inventory Report Thursday, October 28, 2010 Page 2 of 5 Description Narrative Historic Use:Domestic - Multiple Family House Current Use:Domestic - Multiple Family House Plan:L-Shape Stories:2 Structural System:Platform Frame Changes to Plan:Intact Changes to Interior:Unknown Changes to Original Cladding:Intact Changes to Windows:Extensive Changes to Other:Not Applicable Other (specify): Style: Form/Type: Cladding: Foundation: Roof Type:Roof Material: Architecture/Landscape Architecture Study Unit Other Date of Construction: Architect: Engineer: Property appears to meet criteria for the National Register of Historic Places:No Property is located in a potential historic district (National and/or local):No Property potentially contributes to a historic district (National and/or local):No Builder: BrickColonial - Colonial Revival Gable Asphalt / Composition - Shingle Concrete - Poured Multi-Family 1959 Built Date The property was evaluated at a reconnaissance level in a cultural resources survey completed for the proposed Sunset Terrace Redevelopment Subarea in the City of Renton, King County, Washington. It was constructed in 1959, according to the King Count tax assessor, and is known as the Brickshire Manor Apartments. The original owner is unknown, as are the original architect and builder. Changes have been made to the building’s fenestration. The residence’s original windows and doors were replaced with new paneled doors and non-original metal sliding windows. Because of these alterations, the building’s integrity is considered fair. The property has been evaluated according to the eligibility criteria for listing in the National Register of Historic Places (NRHP). The reconnaissance-level survey revealed no evidence to suggest the building is historically significant due to associations with an important event or person. The building is representative of a late 1950s apartment building constructed in the Colonial Revival style. However, it does not appear to embody characteristics or a method of construction that would warrant special recognition, and it is not located in a cohesive neighborhood or grouping. Based on our review, the property has fair integrity and does not appear eligible for listing in the NRHP individually or as a contributor to a potential historic district. Statement of Significance: Historic Inventory Report Thursday, October 28, 2010 Page 3 of 5 City of Renton, Department of Community Development. "Community Profile." Renton, WA: Renton Department of Community Development, 1989. Slauson, Morda C. Renton From Coal to Jets. Renton, WA: Renton Historical Society, 2006. King County Tax Assessor Online Records. The Boeing Company, Renton Reporter, and City of Renton. Renton: The First Hundred Years, 1901-2001. Kent, WA: King County Journal Newspaper, 2001. Buerge, David M. Renton: Where the Water Took Wing. Chatsworth, CA: Windsor Publications, Inc., 1989. Major Bibliographic References: The property contains a one- to two-story multiple-family apartment building with an L-shaped plan and platform frame wood construction on a poured concrete foundation. The north portion of the building’s L -shaped plan is one story high, while its east portion is two stories high. It has a southeast-northwest orientation and faces south toward 2624 NE 9th Place at an angle. The building was originally designed in the Colonial Revival style. It has a medium pitch gable roof with composition asphalt shingles and overhanging eaves at the front and rear elevations. The exterior walls are clad with brick with wood clapboard siding in the gable ends. The primary facades face southeast and southwest, consisting of regularly spaced door and window openings for each housing unit. Each unit has a single door opening flanked by a wide, tripartite picture window and a slightly smaller window opening. All of the original doors and windows have been replaced with non-original paneled doors and metal frame sliding windows. The building’s two-story section is further characterized by a two-story balcony on the southwest elevation supported by slender metal posts and featuring a modern style metal. A wood deck extends the length of the section’s rear elevation, and a tall brick chimney prominently stands at the building’s southeast elevation. A landscaped length of lawn fronts the building’s one-story housing units and a large paved parking area stands adjacent. Description of Physical Appearance: Historic Inventory Report Thursday, October 28, 2010 Page 4 of 5 2010 Southwest Elevation, Looking North Southeast Elevation, Looking Northwest 2010 Photos 2010 Southeast Elevation, Looking Northwest Southeast Elevation, Looking Northwest 2010 Historic Inventory Report Thursday, October 28, 2010 Page 5 of 5 2010 Northeast Elevation, Looking West 2010 Southwest Elevation (Detail), Looking Northeast   Historic Inventory Report Thursday, October 28, 2010 Page 1 of 4 Identification Hetzel, Christopher Survey Name:Date Recorded: Field Recorder: Owner's Name:Fields, Tommy M. and Brenna M. 10/06/2010 City: Classification:Building Resource Status:Comments: State:Zip: Within a District?No Contributing?No National Register: Local District: National Register District/Thematic Nomination Name: Owner Address: Survey/Inventory Not Eligible Eligibility Status: Determination Date: Determination Comments: Not Determined - SHPO 1/1/0001 Sunset Terrace Redevelopment Subarea 2630 NE 9th Pl , Renton, WA 98056 Location Field Site No.DAHP No. Historic Name: Common Name:2630 NE 9th Pl Property Address: Comments: King County T23R05E 09 Township/Range/EW Section 1/4 Sec 1/4 1/4 Sec RENTON Quadrangle Tax No./Parcel No.7227500540 Plat/Block/Lot Acreage Supplemental Map(s) Coordinate Reference Projection: Datum: Easting: Northing: HARN (feet) Washington State Plane South 1224244 794148 Historic Inventory Report Thursday, October 28, 2010 Page 2 of 4 Description Narrative Historic Use:Domestic - Single Family House Current Use:Domestic - Single Family House Plan:Irregular Stories:2 Structural System:Platform Frame Changes to Plan:Moderate Changes to Interior:Unknown Changes to Original Cladding:Extensive Changes to Windows:Slight Changes to Other:Not Applicable Other (specify): Style: Form/Type: Cladding: Foundation: Roof Type:Roof Material: Architecture/Landscape Architecture Study Unit Other Date of Construction: Architect: Engineer: Property appears to meet criteria for the National Register of Historic Places:No Property is located in a potential historic district (National and/or local):No Property potentially contributes to a historic district (National and/or local):No Builder: Veneer - Vinyl SidingModern Gable - Side Gable Asphalt / Composition - Shingle Concrete - Poured Single Family 1959 Built Date The property was evaluated at a reconnaissance level in a cultural resources survey completed for the proposed Sunset Terrace Redevelopment Subarea in the City of Renton, King County, Washington. It was constructed in 1959, according to the King Count tax assessor. The original owner is unknown, as are the original architect and builder. Changes have been made to the building’s exterior wall cladding, which was replaced with non-original vinyl siding. Because of this alteration, the residence’s integrity is considered fair. The property has been evaluated according to the eligibility criteria for listing in the National Register of Historic Places (NRHP). The reconnaissance-level survey revealed no evidence to suggest the residence is historically significant due to associations with an important event or person. The residence exhibits Modern style elements. However, it does not appear to embody characteristics or a method of construction that would warrant special recognition, and it is not located in a cohesive neighborhood or grouping. Based on our review, the property has fair integrity and does not appear eligible for listing in the NRHP individually or as a contributor to a potential historic district. Statement of Significance: Historic Inventory Report Thursday, October 28, 2010 Page 3 of 4 City of Renton, Department of Community Development. "Community Profile." Renton, WA: Renton Department of Community Development, 1989. Slauson, Morda C. Renton From Coal to Jets. Renton, WA: Renton Historical Society, 2006. King County Tax Assessor Online Records. The Boeing Company, Renton Reporter, and City of Renton. Renton: The First Hundred Years, 1901-2001. Kent, WA: King County Journal Newspaper, 2001. Buerge, David M. Renton: Where the Water Took Wing. Chatsworth, CA: Windsor Publications, Inc., 1989. Major Bibliographic References: The property contains a two-story single-family residence with an irregular rectangular plan and platform frame wood construction on a poured concrete foundation. It has a southeast-northwest orientation and faces south toward 2624 NE 9th Place at an angle. The residence was originally designed in the Modern style. It has a low-pitch side gable roof with composition asphalt shingles and overhanging eaves and wide fascia. The exterior walls are clad with non-original vinyl siding. The primary facade is asymmetrically divided and about four bays wide. On the first story, the facade contains the residence’s front entrance flanked by two large window openings in the center and westernmost bays. A wide automobile garage characterizes the easternmost bay. The facade’s second story is characterized by a a nearly full-length, cantilevered balcony, which wraps around to the southwest and rear elevations. It features a modern style balustrade, constructed of wide metal panels alternated between metal posts and affixed to metal rails. The balcony sheltered by the wide overhanging eaves, which also sheltered a series of varied shaped windows. Large sliding glass doors and picture windows characterize the residence’s secondary and rear elevations. The fenestration primarily consists of original metal fixed and sliding windows, although some appear to have been replaced. Description of Physical Appearance: Historic Inventory Report Thursday, October 28, 2010 Page 4 of 4 2010 Southwest Elevation, Looking Northeast Photos 2010 Southeast Elevation, Looking Northwest Historic Inventory Report Thursday, October 28, 2010 Page 1 of 6 Identification Hetzel, Christopher PO BOX 2316 Survey Name:Date Recorded: Field Recorder: Owner's Name:Renton Housing Authority 10/06/2010 City:Renton Classification:Building Resource Status:Comments: State:WA Zip:98056-0316 Within a District?No Contributing?No National Register: Local District: National Register District/Thematic Nomination Name: Owner Address: Survey/Inventory Not Eligible Eligibility Status: Determination Date: Determination Comments: Not Determined - SHPO 1/1/0001 Sunset Terrace Redevelopment Subarea Sunset Terrace Public Housing Complex 2707 NE 10th St , Renton, WA 98056 Location Field Site No.DAHP No. Historic Name: Common Name:2707 NE 10th St Property Address: Comments: King County T23R05E 09 Township/Range/EW Section 1/4 Sec 1/4 1/4 Sec MERCER ISLAND Quadrangle Tax No./Parcel No.7227801085 Plat/Block/Lot Acreage Supplemental Map(s) Coordinate Reference Projection: Datum: Easting: Northing: HARN (feet) Washington State Plane South 1224627 794691 Historic Inventory Report Thursday, October 28, 2010 Page 2 of 6 Description Narrative Historic Use:Domestic - Multiple Family House Current Use:Domestic - Multiple Family House Plan:Rectangle Stories:2 Structural System:Platform Frame Changes to Plan:Intact Changes to Interior:Unknown Changes to Original Cladding:Extensive Changes to Windows:Extensive Changes to Other:Not Applicable Other (specify): Style: Form/Type: Cladding: Foundation: Roof Type:Roof Material: Architecture/Landscape Architecture Study Unit Other Date of Construction: Architect:George W. Stoddard-Huggard & Associates Engineer: Property appears to meet criteria for the National Register of Historic Places:No Property is located in a potential historic district (National and/or local):No Property potentially contributes to a historic district (National and/or local):No Builder:Dahlgren Construction Company Veneer - Vinyl SidingModern Gable - Side Gable Asphalt / Composition Concrete - Poured Multi-Family 1977 Remodel 1959 Built Date Historic Inventory Report Thursday, October 28, 2010 Page 3 of 6 The property has been evaluated according to the eligibility criteria for listing in the National Register of Historic Places (NRHP). Due to the many alterations, the integrity of the individual buildings and the complex as a whole is considered poor. The Sunset Terrace public housing complex resulted from federal investment in public housing during the postwar period and is associated with a well-known Seattle architect. However, it is a late example of its architectural type and its individual elements were substantially altered by rehabilitations in the 1970s and 1990s, such that they no longer appear to retain sufficient integrity to convey their historical significance. Based on our review, the property has poor integrity and does not appear eligible for listing in the NRHP individually or as a potential historic district. Stoddard’s design for Sunset Terrace appears to have been strongly influenced by the Garden City movement and exhibits features and characteristics of garden style apartments. All 27 buildings were arranged along curvilinear streets in locations to best take advantage of the original topography and create open, pleasing landscapes for residents. Throughout Sunset Terrace, each building is separated by open courtyard areas with outdoor space dedicated to individual housing units. At the rear of each unit, this space was originally identified by unit-specific metal revolving clotheslines. Additional design features included minimal ornamentation, aluminum windows, and varied exterior wall cladding of horizontal rustic cedar siding, vertical rough cedar channel siding, or resawn split cedar shake siding with some brick veneer. The Renton Housing Authority completed a comprehensive rehabilitation of Sunset Terrace in the 1970s, which resulted in the removal and replacement of many of these features. The original windows were replaced with new metal windows, unit doors were replaced, the revolving clotheslines were removed, and the original cedar wall claddings were replaced with vinyl siding. Subsequent changes occurred in the early 1990s when buildings in the complex were upgraded for ADA accessibility. Kitchens and bathrooms in the individual housing units were also substantially renovated at this time. The property was evaluated at a reconnaissance level in a cultural resources survey completed for the proposed Sunset Terrace Redevelopment Subarea in the City of Renton, King County, Washington. It is one of 27 buildings constructed by the Housing Authority of the City of Renton as part of the Sunset Terrace public housing complex authorized on June 28, 1958 and completed in 1959. Sunset Terrace consisted of a complex of 100 low-income housing units comprising both one- and two-story structures arranged along curvilinear streets. The complex was constructed by Seattle-based Dahlgren Construction Company according to designs by George W. Stoddard-Huggard & Associates. George W. Stoddard, a prominent Seattle architect and principal of the firm, is credited with the design of many well known public, private, and civic structures in the Seattle area, including such noted properties as the High School Memorial Stadium, the Green Lake Aqua Theater, and the Yesler Terrace Defense Housing Project. Stoddard retired in 1960, and the Sunset Terrace public housing complex is believed to have been one of his last commissions. Statement of Significance: Historic Inventory Report Thursday, October 28, 2010 Page 4 of 6 The property contains a two-story four unit apartment building constructed as part of the Sunset Terrace public housing complex in 1958-1959. Buildings in the complex were designed in one of six standard design types, each exhibiting Modern style elements. This building was constructed as a type “E” building. The building has a long rectangular plan and consists of platform frame wood construction on a poured concrete foundation. It has a very low pitch side gable roof clad with composition asphalt shingles and featuring slightly overhanging eaves with a wide fascia. Four small cylindrical, metal roof vents stand equally spaced along the roof ridge line. The exterior walls are clad with non-original horizontally applied vinyl siding. This siding replaced the building’s original vertically applied, rough cedar channel siding during rehabilitation of the building in the 1970s. The building has a northeast-southwest orientation and its primary (north) facade fronts NE 10th Street. The primary facade is symmetrically divided and consists of four nearly identical sections, each comprising a single housing unit. On the first story, each section consists of a single door opening fit with a non-original paneled door, flanked by a wide tripartite picture window. Two cantilevered shed roofs extend between the sections sheltering each pair of door openings. The doors open onto poured concrete stoops connected to poured concrete sidewalks that lead to the street. On the second story, each section is punctuated by a slightly shorter, tripartite picture window. The building’s rear elevation is similarly divided, each section containing a single door opening flanked by two small windows on the first story, and featuring a wide tripartite picture window and another small window on the second story. The two center sections on the second story projects from the elevation, cantilevered over the first story. The building’s side elevations are unadorned. All of the building’s original windows were replaced with non-original metal windows in the 1970s. Other alterations to the building include the removal of original metal revolving clothes lines outside the rear entrance of each unit, and complete renovations of the building’s bathrooms and kitchens and ADA accessibility improvements in the early 1990s. Description of Physical Appearance: Historic Inventory Report Thursday, October 28, 2010 Page 5 of 6 Ochsner, Jeffery Karl, ed. Shaping Seattle Architecture: A Historical Guide to the Architects. Seattle, WA: University of Washington Press, 1998. Lord, Tom Forrester. Decent Housing: A Promise to Keep. Federal Housing Policy and its Impact on the City. Cambridge, MA: Schenkman Publishing Company, Inc., 1977. Madison, Charles A. Preface. In How the Other Half Lives. Jacob A. Riis. New York, NY: Dover Publications, Inc., 1971. __________. "Obituaries: George W. Stoddard." 29 September 1967:16. Seattle, WA. Rabinowitz, Alan. Urban Economics and Land Use in America: The Transformation of Cities in the Twentieth Century. Armonk, NY: M.E. Sharpe, Inc., 2004. The Seattle Times. "Seattle Firm Supported for Housing Job." 18 March 1959:44. Seattle, WA. Elenga, Maureen R. Seattle Architecture: A Walking Guide to Downtown. Seattle, WA: Seattle Architecture Foundation, 2007. Associated Press. "Tacoma Gets Housing Blues; To Renton It’s Not News." The Seattle Times. Seattle, WA, 29 June 1958. George W. Stoddard-Huggard & Associates. "Housing Authority of the City of Renton: Project Washington II-I, Renton Highlands, Renton, Washington." Construction Plans. Seattle, WA: George W. Stoddard- Huggard & Associates Architects & Engineers, 1958. On file with Renton Housing Authority, Renton, WA. Karolak, Eric J. "No Idea of Doing Anything Wonderful: The Labor-Crisis Origins of National Housing Policy and the Reconstruction of the Working-Class Community, 1917-1919." In From Tenemants to the Taylor Homes; In Search of an Urban Housing Policy in Twentieth-Century American. John F. Bauman, Roger Biles, Kristin M. Szylvian, eds. pp. 60-80. University Park, PA: Pennsylvania State University, 2000. Hanchett, Thomas W. "The Other 'Subsidized Housing': Federal Aid to Suburbanization, 1940-1960s." In From Tenements to the Taylor Homes; In Search of an Urban Housing Policy in Twentieth-Century American. John F. Bauman, Roger Biles, Kristin M. Szylvian, eds. Pp. 163-179. University Park, PA: Pennsylvania State University, 2000. Howard, Ebenezer. Garden Cities of Tomorrow. London: Swan Sonnenschein & Co., Ltd., 1902. Major Bibliographic References: Historic Inventory Report Thursday, October 28, 2010 Page 6 of 6 2010 West and South Elevations, Looking Northeast Photos 2010 West and North Elevations, Looking Southeast Historic Inventory Report Thursday, October 28, 2010 Page 1 of 6 Identification Hetzel, Christopher PO BOX 2316 Survey Name:Date Recorded: Field Recorder: Owner's Name:Renton Housing Authority 10/06/2010 City:Renton Classification:Building Resource Status:Comments: State:WA Zip:98056-0316 Within a District?No Contributing?No National Register: Local District: National Register District/Thematic Nomination Name: Owner Address: Survey/Inventory Not Eligible Eligibility Status: Determination Date: Determination Comments: Not Determined - SHPO 1/1/0001 Sunset Terrace Redevelopment Subarea Sunset Terrace Public Housing Complex 2715 NE 10th St , Renton, WA 98056 Location Field Site No.DAHP No. Historic Name: Common Name:2715 NE 10th St Property Address: Comments: King County T23R05E 09 Township/Range/EW Section 1/4 Sec 1/4 1/4 Sec MERCER ISLAND Quadrangle Tax No./Parcel No.7227801085 Plat/Block/Lot Acreage Supplemental Map(s) Coordinate Reference Projection: Datum: Easting: Northing: HARN (feet) Washington State Plane South 1224729 794634 Historic Inventory Report Thursday, October 28, 2010 Page 2 of 6 Description Narrative Historic Use:Domestic - Multiple Family House Current Use:Domestic - Multiple Family House Plan:Rectangle Stories:2 Structural System:Platform Frame Changes to Plan:Intact Changes to Interior:Unknown Changes to Original Cladding:Extensive Changes to Windows:Extensive Changes to Other:Not Applicable Other (specify): Style: Form/Type: Cladding: Foundation: Roof Type:Roof Material: Architecture/Landscape Architecture Study Unit Other Date of Construction: Architect:George W. Stoddard-Huggard & Associates Engineer: Property appears to meet criteria for the National Register of Historic Places:No Property is located in a potential historic district (National and/or local):No Property potentially contributes to a historic district (National and/or local):No Builder:Dahlgren Construction Company Veneer - Vinyl SidingModern Gable - Side Gable Asphalt / Composition - Shingle Concrete - Poured Multi-Family 1977 Remodel 1959 Built Date Historic Inventory Report Thursday, October 28, 2010 Page 3 of 6 The property has been evaluated according to the eligibility criteria for listing in the National Register of Historic Places (NRHP). Due to the many alterations, the integrity of the individual buildings and the complex as a whole is considered poor. The Sunset Terrace public housing complex resulted from federal investment in public housing during the postwar period and is associated with a well-known Seattle architect. However, it is a late example of its architectural type and its individual elements were substantially altered by rehabilitations in the 1970s and 1990s, such that they no longer appear to retain sufficient integrity to convey their historical significance. Based on our review, the property has poor integrity and does not appear eligible for listing in the NRHP individually or as a potential historic district. Stoddard’s design for Sunset Terrace appears to have been strongly influenced by the Garden City movement and exhibits features and characteristics of garden style apartments. All 27 buildings were arranged along curvilinear streets in locations to best take advantage of the original topography and create open, pleasing landscapes for residents. Throughout Sunset Terrace, each building is separated by open courtyard areas with outdoor space dedicated to individual housing units. At the rear of each unit, this space was originally identified by unit-specific metal revolving clotheslines. Additional design features included minimal ornamentation, aluminum windows, and varied exterior wall cladding of horizontal rustic cedar siding, vertical rough cedar channel siding, or resawn split cedar shake siding with some brick veneer. The Renton Housing Authority completed a comprehensive rehabilitation of Sunset Terrace in the 1970s, which resulted in the removal and replacement of many of these features. The original windows were replaced with new metal windows, unit doors were replaced, the revolving clotheslines were removed, and the original cedar wall claddings were replaced with vinyl siding. Subsequent changes occurred in the early 1990s when buildings in the complex were upgraded for ADA accessibility. Kitchens and bathrooms in the individual housing units were also substantially renovated at this time. The property was evaluated at a reconnaissance level in a cultural resources survey completed for the proposed Sunset Terrace Redevelopment Subarea in the City of Renton, King County, Washington. It is one of 27 buildings constructed by the Housing Authority of the City of Renton as part of the Sunset Terrace public housing complex authorized on June 28, 1958 and completed in 1959. Sunset Terrace consisted of a complex of 100 low-income housing units comprising both one- and two-story structures arranged along curvilinear streets. The complex was constructed by Seattle-based Dahlgren Construction Company according to designs by George W. Stoddard-Huggard & Associates. George W. Stoddard, a prominent Seattle architect and principal of the firm, is credited with the design of many well known public, private, and civic structures in the Seattle area, including such noted properties as the High School Memorial Stadium, the Green Lake Aqua Theater, and the Yesler Terrace Defense Housing Project. Stoddard retired in 1960, and the Sunset Terrace public housing complex is believed to have been one of his last commissions. Statement of Significance: Historic Inventory Report Thursday, October 28, 2010 Page 4 of 6 The property contains a two-story four unit apartment building constructed as part of the Sunset Terrace public housing complex in 1958-1959. Buildings in the complex were designed in one of six standard design types, each exhibiting Modern style elements. This building was constructed as a type “F” building. The building has a long rectangular plan and consists of platform frame wood construction on a poured concrete foundation. It has a very low pitch side gable roof clad with composition asphalt shingles and featuring slightly overhanging eaves with a wide fascia. Four small cylindrical, metal roof vents stand equally spaced along the roof ridge line. The exterior walls are clad with non-original horizontally applied vinyl siding. This siding replaced the building’s original horizontally applied, rustic cedar beveled siding during rehabilitation of the building in the 1970s. The building has a northeast-southwest orientation and its primary (north) facade fronts NE 10th Street. The primary facade is symmetrically divided and consists of four nearly identical sections, each comprising a single housing unit. On the first story, each section consists of a single door opening fit with a non-original paneled door, flanked by a wide tripartite picture window. Two cantilevered shed roofs extend between the sections sheltering each pair of door openings. The doors open onto poured concrete stoops connected to poured concrete sidewalks that lead to the street. On the second story, each section is punctuated by two slightly shorter, tripartite picture windows. The building’s rear elevation is similarly divided, each section containing a single door opening flanked by small metal-sliding windows on the first story, and featuring a wide tripartite picture window and a small metal-sliding window on the second story. The entire second story projects from the elevation, and the rear entrances are sheltered by cantilevered shed roofs. The building’s side elevations are clad with brick, but are otherwise unadorned. All of the building’s original windows were replaced with non-original metal windows in the 1970s. Other alterations to the building include the removal of original metal revolving clothes lines outside the rear entrance of each unit, and complete renovations of the building’s bathrooms and kitchens and ADA accessibility improvements in the early 1990s. Description of Physical Appearance: Historic Inventory Report Thursday, October 28, 2010 Page 5 of 6 Ochsner, Jeffery Karl, ed. Shaping Seattle Architecture: A Historical Guide to the Architects. Seattle, WA: University of Washington Press, 1998. Lord, Tom Forrester. Decent Housing: A Promise to Keep. Federal Housing Policy and its Impact on the City. Cambridge, MA: Schenkman Publishing Company, Inc., 1977. Madison, Charles A. Preface. In How the Other Half Lives. Jacob A. Riis. New York, NY: Dover Publications, Inc., 1971. __________. "Obituaries: George W. Stoddard." 29 September 1967:16. Seattle, WA. Rabinowitz, Alan. Urban Economics and Land Use in America: The Transformation of Cities in the Twentieth Century. Armonk, NY: M.E. Sharpe, Inc., 2004. The Seattle Times. "Seattle Firm Supported for Housing Job." 18 March 1959:44. Seattle, WA. Elenga, Maureen R. Seattle Architecture: A Walking Guide to Downtown. Seattle, WA: Seattle Architecture Foundation, 2007. Associated Press. "Tacoma Gets Housing Blues; To Renton It’s Not News." The Seattle Times. Seattle, WA, 29 June 1958. George W. Stoddard-Huggard & Associates. "Housing Authority of the City of Renton: Project Washington II-I, Renton Highlands, Renton, Washington." Construction Plans. Seattle, WA: George W. Stoddard- Huggard & Associates Architects & Engineers, 1958. On file with Renton Housing Authority, Renton, WA. Karolak, Eric J. "No Idea of Doing Anything Wonderful: The Labor-Crisis Origins of National Housing Policy and the Reconstruction of the Working-Class Community, 1917-1919." In From Tenemants to the Taylor Homes; In Search of an Urban Housing Policy in Twentieth-Century American. John F. Bauman, Roger Biles, Kristin M. Szylvian, eds. pp. 60-80. University Park, PA: Pennsylvania State University, 2000. Hanchett, Thomas W. "The Other 'Subsidized Housing': Federal Aid to Suburbanization, 1940-1960s." In From Tenements to the Taylor Homes; In Search of an Urban Housing Policy in Twentieth-Century American. John F. Bauman, Roger Biles, Kristin M. Szylvian, eds. Pp. 163-179. University Park, PA: Pennsylvania State University, 2000. Howard, Ebenezer. Garden Cities of Tomorrow. London: Swan Sonnenschein & Co., Ltd., 1902. Major Bibliographic References: Historic Inventory Report Thursday, October 28, 2010 Page 6 of 6 2010 Northeast Elevation, Looking South Photos Southeast and Northeast Elevations, Looking West 2010 Northeast Elevation, Looking West 2010 Historic Inventory Report Thursday, October 28, 2010 Page 1 of 4 Identification Hetzel, Christopher Survey Name:Date Recorded: Field Recorder: Owner's Name:HSIEH Investments 10/06/2010 City: Classification:Building Resource Status:Comments: State:Zip: Within a District?No Contributing?No National Register: Local District: National Register District/Thematic Nomination Name: Owner Address: Survey/Inventory Not Eligible Eligibility Status: Determination Date: Determination Comments: Not Determined - SHPO 1/1/0001 Sunset Terrace Redevelopment Subarea 1100-1110 Edmonds Ave NE, Renton, WA 98056 Location Field Site No.DAHP No. Historic Name: Common Name:1100-1110 Edmonds Ave NE Property Address: Comments: King County T23R05E 09 Township/Range/EW Section 1/4 Sec 1/4 1/4 Sec MERCER ISLAND Quadrangle Tax No./Parcel No.0923059161 Plat/Block/Lot Acreage Supplemental Map(s) Coordinate Reference Projection: Datum: Easting: Northing: HARN (feet) Washington State Plane South 1223977 795003 Historic Inventory Report Thursday, October 28, 2010 Page 2 of 4 Description Narrative Historic Use:Commerce/Trade - Organizational Current Use:Commerce/Trade - Professional Plan:T-Shape Stories:2-3 Structural System:Concrete - Block Changes to Plan:Slight Changes to Interior:Unknown Changes to Original Cladding:Intact Changes to Windows:Extensive Changes to Other:Not Applicable Other (specify): Style: Form/Type: Cladding: Foundation: Roof Type:Roof Material: Architecture/Landscape Architecture Study Unit Other Date of Construction: Architect: Engineer: Property appears to meet criteria for the National Register of Historic Places:No Property is located in a potential historic district (National and/or local):No Property potentially contributes to a historic district (National and/or local):No Builder: Wood - Clapboard Concrete - BlockModern Flat with Parapet Unknown Concrete - Poured Commercial 1964 Built Date The property was evaluated at a reconnaissance level in a cultural resources survey completed for the proposed Sunset Terrace Redevelopment Subarea in the City of Renton, King County, Washington. It was constructed in 1964, according to the King Count tax assessor, and is presently occupied by the Hwazan Buddhist Foundation. The original owner is unknown, as are the original architect and builder. Changes appear to have been made to the building’s fenestration, but it otherwise seems to retain good integrity. The property has been evaluated according to the eligibility criteria for listing in the National Register of Historic Places (NRHP). The reconnaissance-level survey revealed no evidence to suggest the building is historically significant due to associations with an important event or person. The building exhibits elements of the Modern style. However, it does not appear to embody characteristics or a method of construction that would warrant special recognition, and it is not located in a cohesive neighborhood or grouping. Based on our review, the property has good integrity, but does not appear eligible for listing in the NRHP individually or as a contributor to a potential historic district. Statement of Significance: Historic Inventory Report Thursday, October 28, 2010 Page 3 of 4 King County Tax Assessor Online Records. Slauson, Morda C. Renton From Coal to Jets. Renton, WA: Renton Historical Society, 2006. The Boeing Company, Renton Reporter, and City of Renton. Renton: The First Hundred Years, 1901-2001. Kent, WA: King County Journal Newspaper, 2001. Buerge, David M. Renton: Where the Water Took Wing. Chatsworth, CA: Windsor Publications, Inc., 1989. City of Renton, Department of Community Development. "Community Profile." Renton, WA: Renton Department of Community Development, 1989. Major Bibliographic References: The property contains a two- to three-story commercial office that stands on top of a hill above NE Sunset Boulevard. It has a southwest-northeast orientation, facing southwest, and is accessed from Edmonds Avenue NE by a long paved drive. The building has a T-shaped plan and a combination of poured concrete, masonry, and steel frame construction. The building was originally designed in the Modern style. It has a flat roof with a metal capped parapet. The exterior walls primarily consist of wide panels of finished concrete block, interspersed by horizontal wood siding above and below window and door openings. The primary (southwest) facade is nearly symmetrically divided and eight bays wide. It is three stories tall and characterized by regularly spaced windows openings on each level. The large window openings are vertically aligned in paired columns that extend the elevations full height, in between wide panels of unadorned concrete block. Door openings are present in each elevation, including a second-story entrance accessed by a long, elevated ramp along the southeast elevation. The ramp is supported by a series of square concrete structural columns and has a metal railing. Description of Physical Appearance: Historic Inventory Report Thursday, October 28, 2010 Page 4 of 4 2010 West and South Elevations, Looking Northeast Photos Southeast Elevation, Looking North 2010 West Elevation, Looking Northwest 2010 Historic Inventory Report Monday, December 06, 2010 Page 1 of 4 Identification Hetzel, Christopher Survey Name:Date Recorded: Field Recorder: Owner's Name:Tran, Timothy 10/06/2010 City: Classification:Building Resource Status:Comments: State:Zip: Within a District?No Contributing?No National Register: Local District: National Register District/Thematic Nomination Name: Owner Address: Survey/Inventory Eligibility Status: Determination Date: Determination Comments: Not Determined - SHPO 1/1/0001 Renton Sunset-Temp 1012 Edmonds Ave NE, Renton, WA 98056 Location Field Site No.DAHP No. Historic Name: Common Name:1012 Edmonds Ave NE Property Address: Comments: King County T23R05E 09 Township/Range/EW Section 1/4 Sec 1/4 1/4 Sec RENTON Quadrangle Tax No./Parcel No.0923059119 Plat/Block/Lot Acreage Supplemental Map(s) Coordinate Reference Projection: Datum: Easting: Northing: HARN (feet) Washington State Plane South 1223985 794435 Historic Inventory Report Monday, December 06, 2010 Page 2 of 4 Description Narrative Historic Use:Domestic - Single Family House Current Use:Domestic - Single Family House Plan:Rectangle Stories:1.5 Structural System:Platform Frame Changes to Plan:Intact Changes to Interior:Unknown Changes to Original Cladding:Extensive Changes to Windows:Extensive Changes to Other:Not Applicable Other (specify): Style: Form/Type: Cladding: Foundation: Roof Type:Roof Material: Architecture/Landscape Architecture Study Unit Other Date of Construction: Architect: Engineer: Property appears to meet criteria for the National Register of Historic Places:No Property is located in a potential historic district (National and/or local):No Property potentially contributes to a historic district (National and/or local):No Builder: Shingle - Concrete/Asbestos Vernacular Gable - Front Gable Asphalt / Composition - Shingle Concrete - Poured Single Family 1948 Built Date The property was evaluated at a reconnaissance level in a cultural resources survey completed for the proposed Sunset Terrace Redevelopment Subarea in the City of Renton, King County, Washington. It was constructed in 1948, according to the King Count tax assessor. The original owner is unknown, as are the original architect and builder. Changes have been made to the house, including the removal and replacement of its original windows, the installation of non-original asbestos siding on the exterior walls, and the enclosure of the basement level garage. Because of these alterations, the residence’s integrity is considered poor. The property has been evaluated according to the eligibility criteria for listing in the National Register of Historic Places (NRHP). The reconnaissance-level survey revealed no evidence to suggest the building is historically significant due to associations with an important event or person. The house exhibits elements of the a vernacular style. However, it has lost integrity and does not appear to otherwise embody characteristics or a method of construction that would warrant special recognition, and it is not located in a cohesive neighborhood or grouping. Based on our review, the property has poor integrity and does not appear eligible for listing in the NRHP individually or as a contributor to a potential historic district. Statement of Significance: Historic Inventory Report Monday, December 06, 2010 Page 3 of 4 City of Renton, Department of Community Development. "Community Profile." Renton, WA: Renton Department of Community Development, 1989. Slauson, Morda C. Renton From Coal to Jets. Renton, WA: Renton Historical Society, 2006. King County Tax Assessor Online Records. The Boeing Company, Renton Reporter, and City of Renton. Renton: The First Hundred Years, 1901-2001. Kent, WA: King County Journal Newspaper, 2001. Buerge, David M. Renton: Where the Water Took Wing. Chatsworth, CA: Windsor Publications, Inc., 1989. Major Bibliographic References: The property contains a one and a half-story single-family residence with a rectangular plan and platform frame wood construction on a raised, poured concrete foundation, exposing a full basement level. It has an east-west orientation, facing west towards Edmonds Avenue NE. The residence was originally designed with vernacular style elements. It has a steeply pitched front-gable roof with composition asphalt shingles and no overhanging eaves. The exterior walls are clad with non-original asbestos shingle siding. The primary facade is symmetrically divided and three bays wide. The first story is characterized by a full- width projecting front porch. The porch has a hip roof supported by slender wood support posts and a wood balustrade. The porch shelters the residence’s front door opening, which is located in the center bay, and a single window opening in each of the out two bays. The original windows have been replaced with non-original sliding windows. The fenestration consists of non-original metal windows windows throughout the residence. A single, altered window opening punctuates the half story. At ground level, a single door opening and window opening provide access to the basement. Regularly spaced window openings characterize the house’s side elevations. The front yard is landscaped with a poured concrete retaining wall, a concrete sidewalk leading to the front porch, and a paved parking area before the basement-level entrance. Description of Physical Appearance: Historic Inventory Report Monday, December 06, 2010 Page 4 of 4 Photos 2010 West Elevation, Looking Northeast Historic Inventory Report Monday, December 06, 2010 Page 1 of 4 Identification Hetzel, Christopher Survey Name:Date Recorded: Field Recorder: Owner's Name:Calvary Baptist Church 10/06/2010 City: Classification:Building Resource Status:Comments: State:Zip: Within a District?No Contributing?No National Register: Local District: National Register District/Thematic Nomination Name: Owner Address: Survey/Inventory Eligibility Status: Determination Date: Determination Comments: Not Determined - SHPO 1/1/0001 Renton Sunset-Temp 1024 Edmonds Ave NE, Renton, WA 98056 Location Field Site No.DAHP No. Historic Name: Common Name:Calvary Baptist Church Property Address: Comments: King County T23R05E 09 Township/Range/EW Section 1/4 Sec 1/4 1/4 Sec MERCER ISLAND Quadrangle Tax No./Parcel No.0923059086 Plat/Block/Lot Acreage Supplemental Map(s) Coordinate Reference Projection: Datum: Easting: Northing: HARN (feet) Washington State Plane South 1223858 794619 Historic Inventory Report Monday, December 06, 2010 Page 2 of 4 Description Narrative Historic Use:Religion - Religious Facility Current Use:Religion - Religious Facility Plan:Irregular Stories:2 Structural System:Platform Frame Changes to Plan:Moderate Changes to Interior:Unknown Changes to Original Cladding:Intact Changes to Windows:Intact Changes to Other: Other (specify): Style: Form/Type: Cladding: Foundation: Roof Type:Roof Material: Architecture/Landscape Architecture Study Unit Other Date of Construction: Architect: Engineer: Property appears to meet criteria for the National Register of Historic Places:No Property is located in a potential historic district (National and/or local):No Property potentially contributes to a historic district (National and/or local):No Builder: Brick Veneer - StuccoModern Gable Hip Asphalt / Composition - Shingle Concrete - Poured Church 1954 Built Date The property was evaluated at a reconnaissance level in a cultural resources survey completed for the proposed Sunset Terrace Redevelopment Subarea in the City of Renton, King County, Washington. Erected as a church, it was constructed in 1954, according to the King Count tax assessor. The original owner is unknown, as are the original architect and builder. Changes have been made to the building, including the construction of a large addition on the south elevation. Because of these alterations, the building’s integrity is considered fair. The property has been evaluated according to the eligibility criteria for listing in the National Register of Historic Places (NRHP). The reconnaissance-level survey revealed no evidence to suggest the building is historically significant due to associations with an important event or person. The church exhibits elements of the Modern style. However, it does not appear to embody characteristics or a method of construction that would warrant special recognition, and it is not located in a cohesive neighborhood or grouping. Based on our review, the property has fair integrity and does not appear eligible for listing in the NRHP individually or as a contributor to a potential historic district. Statement of Significance: Historic Inventory Report Monday, December 06, 2010 Page 3 of 4 City of Renton, Department of Community Development. Community Profile. Renton, WA: Renton Department of Community Development, 1989. Slauson, Morda C. Renton From Coal to Jets. Renton, WA: Renton Historical Society, 2006. King County Tax Assessor Online Records. The Boeing Company, Renton Reporter, and City of Renton. Renton: The First Hundred Years, 1901-2001. Kent, WA: King County Journal Newspaper, 2001. Buerge, David M. Renton: Where the Water Took Wing. Chatsworth, CA: Windsor Publications, Inc., 1989. Major Bibliographic References: The property contains a two-story church building with a irregular plan and platform frame wood construction on a poured concrete foundation. It has an east west orientation, with the front facing west towards Edmonds Avenue NE. The building was originally designed in the Modern style, consisting of two sections forming a T-shaped plan with a cross-gable roof. This plan was disrupted by the construction of large addition in 1979 on the building’s south elevation. Within the original building, the section containing the sanctuary has a steeply pitched gable roof clad with composition asphalt shingles It is adorned with a center section of brick veneer flanked by stucco on the west elevation, and features a large decorative Christian cross. The section’s side elevations are clad with brick and a series of large plate glass windows. The building’s main entrance is situated on the north elevation. It is sheltered by wide overhanging eaves and accessed by a poured concrete sidewalk and wheelchair ramp. The sanctuary section abuts a two-story office and classroom section on the east. This section has a medium-pitch gable roof clad with composition asphalt shingles and no overhanging eaves. Its exterior walls are clad with brick and feature regularly spaced double-hung sash windows on each elevation. The 1979 addition attaches to the original building at its southeast corner. It is three-stories high and features a low-pitch hip roof clad with composition asphalt shingles and has slightly overhanging eaves. The fenestration consists of banks of metal-frame fixed windows with operable lower sashes. Description of Physical Appearance: Historic Inventory Report Monday, December 06, 2010 Page 4 of 4 2010 West Elevation (Showing Addition), Looking Southeast Photos 2010 North and West Elevations, Looking Southeast Historic Inventory Report Thursday, October 28, 2010 Page 1 of 6 Identification Hetzel, Christopher PO BOX 2316 Survey Name:Date Recorded: Field Recorder: Owner's Name:Renton Housing Authority 10/06/2010 City:Renton Classification:Building Resource Status:Comments: State:WA Zip:98056-0316 Within a District?No Contributing?No National Register: Local District: National Register District/Thematic Nomination Name: Owner Address: Survey/Inventory Not Eligible Eligibility Status: Determination Date: Determination Comments: Not Determined - SHPO 1/1/0001 Sunset Terrace Redevelopment Subarea Sunset Terrace Public Housing Complex 1007 Glennwood Ave NE, Renton, WA 98056 Location Field Site No.DAHP No. Historic Name: Common Name:1007 Glennwood Ave NE Property Address: Comments: King County T23R05E 09 Township/Range/EW Section 1/4 Sec 1/4 1/4 Sec MERCER ISLAND Quadrangle Tax No./Parcel No.7227801400 Plat/Block/Lot Acreage Supplemental Map(s) Coordinate Reference Projection: Datum: Easting: Northing: HARN (feet) Washington State Plane South 1224331 794661 Historic Inventory Report Thursday, October 28, 2010 Page 2 of 6 Description Narrative Historic Use:Domestic - Multiple Family House Current Use:Domestic - Multiple Family House Plan:Rectangle Stories:2 Structural System:Platform Frame Changes to Plan:Intact Changes to Interior:Unknown Changes to Original Cladding:Extensive Changes to Windows:Extensive Changes to Other:Not Applicable Other (specify): Style: Form/Type: Cladding: Foundation: Roof Type:Roof Material: Architecture/Landscape Architecture Study Unit Other Date of Construction: Architect:George W. Stoddard-Huggard & Associates Engineer: Property appears to meet criteria for the National Register of Historic Places:No Property is located in a potential historic district (National and/or local):No Property potentially contributes to a historic district (National and/or local):No Builder:Dahlgren Construction Company Veneer - Vinyl SidingModern Gable - Side Gable Asphalt / Composition - Shingle Concrete - Poured Multi-Family 1977 Remodel 1959 Built Date Historic Inventory Report Thursday, October 28, 2010 Page 3 of 6 The property has been evaluated according to the eligibility criteria for listing in the National Register of Historic Places (NRHP). Due to the many alterations, the integrity of the individual buildings and the complex as a whole is considered poor. The Sunset Terrace public housing complex resulted from federal investment in public housing during the postwar period and is associated with a well-known Seattle architect. However, it is a late example of its architectural type and its individual elements were substantially altered by rehabilitations in the 1970s and 1990s, such that they no longer appear to retain sufficient integrity to convey their historical significance. Based on our review, the property has poor integrity and does not appear eligible for listing in the NRHP individually or as a potential historic district. Stoddard’s design for Sunset Terrace appears to have been strongly influenced by the Garden City movement and exhibits features and characteristics of garden style apartments. All 27 buildings were arranged along curvilinear streets in locations to best take advantage of the original topography and create open, pleasing landscapes for residents. Throughout Sunset Terrace, each building is separated by open courtyard areas with outdoor space dedicated to individual housing units. At the rear of each unit, this space was originally identified by unit-specific metal revolving clotheslines. Additional design features included minimal ornamentation, aluminum windows, and varied exterior wall cladding of horizontal rustic cedar siding, vertical rough cedar channel siding, or resawn split cedar shake siding with some brick veneer. The Renton Housing Authority completed a comprehensive rehabilitation of Sunset Terrace in the 1970s, which resulted in the removal and replacement of many of these features. The original windows were replaced with new metal windows, unit doors were replaced, the revolving clotheslines were removed, and the original cedar wall claddings were replaced with vinyl siding. Subsequent changes occurred in the early 1990s when buildings in the complex were upgraded for ADA accessibility. Kitchens and bathrooms in the individual housing units were also substantially renovated at this time. The property was evaluated at a reconnaissance level in a cultural resources survey completed for the proposed Sunset Terrace Redevelopment Subarea in the City of Renton, King County, Washington. It is one of 27 buildings constructed by the Housing Authority of the City of Renton as part of the Sunset Terrace public housing complex authorized on June 28, 1958 and completed in 1959. Sunset Terrace consisted of a complex of 100 low-income housing units comprising both one- and two-story structures arranged along curvilinear streets. The complex was constructed by Seattle-based Dahlgren Construction Company according to designs by George W. Stoddard-Huggard & Associates. George W. Stoddard, a prominent Seattle architect and principal of the firm, is credited with the design of many well known public, private, and civic structures in the Seattle area, including such noted properties as the High School Memorial Stadium, the Green Lake Aqua Theater, and the Yesler Terrace Defense Housing Project. Stoddard retired in 1960, and the Sunset Terrace public housing complex is believed to have been one of his last commissions. Statement of Significance: Historic Inventory Report Thursday, October 28, 2010 Page 4 of 6 The property contains a one to two-story four unit apartment building constructed as part of the Sunset Terrace public housing complex in 1958-1959. Buildings in the complex were designed in one of six standard design types, each exhibiting Modern style elements. This building was constructed as a type “D” building. The building has a long rectangular plan and consists of platform frame wood construction on a poured concrete foundation. It has a very low pitch side gable roof clad with composition asphalt shingles and featuring slightly overhanging eaves with a wide fascia. Four small cylindrical, metal roof vents stand equally spaced along the roof ridge line. The exterior walls are clad with non-original horizontally applied vinyl siding. This siding replaced the building’s original resawn split cedar shake siding on the first story and vertically applied, rough cedar channel siding on the second story during rehabilitation of the building in the 1970s. The building has a northeast-southwest orientation and its primary (north) facade fronts Glennwood Avenue NE. The primary facade is symmetrically divided and consists of four sections, each comprising a single housing unit. The two center sections are two stories tall and the two outer sections are one story tall. On the first story, each section consists of a single door opening fit with a non-original paneled door, flanked by a wide tripartite picture window. The doors open onto poured concrete stoops connected to poured concrete sidewalks that lead to the street. On the second story, each center section is punctuated by a single, slightly shorter, tripartite picture window. The building’s rear elevation is similarly divided, each section containing a single door opening flanked by a small metal-sliding window and a tripartite picture window on the first story, and featuring a wide tripartite picture window and a small metal-sliding window on the second story. The building’s side elevations are unadorned. All of the building’s original windows were replaced with non-original metal windows in the 1970s. Other alterations to the building include the removal of original metal revolving clothes lines outside the rear entrance of each unit, and complete renovations of the building’s bathrooms and kitchens and ADA accessibility improvements in the early 1990s. Description of Physical Appearance: Historic Inventory Report Thursday, October 28, 2010 Page 5 of 6 Ochsner, Jeffery Karl, ed. Shaping Seattle Architecture: A Historical Guide to the Architects. Seattle, WA: University of Washington Press, 1998. Lord, Tom Forrester. Decent Housing: A Promise to Keep. Federal Housing Policy and its Impact on the City. Cambridge, MA: Schenkman Publishing Company, Inc., 1977. Madison, Charles A. Preface. In How the Other Half Lives. Jacob A. Riis. New York, NY: Dover Publications, Inc., 1971. __________. "Obituaries: George W. Stoddard." 29 September 1967:16. Seattle, WA. Rabinowitz, Alan. Urban Economics and Land Use in America: The Transformation of Cities in the Twentieth Century. Armonk, NY: M.E. Sharpe, Inc., 2004. The Seattle Times. "Seattle Firm Supported for Housing Job." 18 March 1959:44. Seattle, WA. Elenga, Maureen R. Seattle Architecture: A Walking Guide to Downtown. Seattle, WA: Seattle Architecture Foundation, 2007. Associated Press. "Tacoma Gets Housing Blues; To Renton It’s Not News." The Seattle Times. Seattle, WA, 29 June 1958. George W. Stoddard-Huggard & Associates. "Housing Authority of the City of Renton: Project Washington II-I, Renton Highlands, Renton, Washington." Construction Plans. Seattle, WA: George W. Stoddard- Huggard & Associates Architects & Engineers, 1958. On file with Renton Housing Authority, Renton, WA. Karolak, Eric J. "No Idea of Doing Anything Wonderful: The Labor-Crisis Origins of National Housing Policy and the Reconstruction of the Working-Class Community, 1917-1919." In From Tenemants to the Taylor Homes; In Search of an Urban Housing Policy in Twentieth-Century American. John F. Bauman, Roger Biles, Kristin M. Szylvian, eds. pp. 60-80. University Park, PA: Pennsylvania State University, 2000. Hanchett, Thomas W. "The Other 'Subsidized Housing': Federal Aid to Suburbanization, 1940-1960s." In From Tenements to the Taylor Homes; In Search of an Urban Housing Policy in Twentieth-Century American. John F. Bauman, Roger Biles, Kristin M. Szylvian, eds. Pp. 163-179. University Park, PA: Pennsylvania State University, 2000. Howard, Ebenezer. Garden Cities of Tomorrow. London: Swan Sonnenschein & Co., Ltd., 1902. Major Bibliographic References: Historic Inventory Report Thursday, October 28, 2010 Page 6 of 6 2010 North Elevation, Looking Southwest Photos North Elevation Detail, Looking South 2010 North and West Elevations, Looking Southeast 2010 Historic Inventory Report Thursday, October 28, 2010 Page 1 of 6 Identification Hetzel, Christopher PO Box 2316 Survey Name:Date Recorded: Field Recorder: Owner's Name:Renton Housing Authority 10/06/2010 City:Renton Classification:Building Resource Status:Comments: State:WA Zip:98056-0316 Within a District?No Contributing?No National Register: Local District: National Register District/Thematic Nomination Name: Owner Address: Survey/Inventory Not Eligible Eligibility Status: Determination Date: Determination Comments: Not Determined - SHPO 1/1/0001 Sunset Terrace Redevelopment Subarea Sunset Terrace Public Housing Complex 1052 Glennwood Ave NE, Renton, WA 98056 Location Field Site No.DAHP No. Historic Name: Common Name:1011 Glennwood Ave NE Property Address: Comments: King County T23R05E 09 Township/Range/EW Section 1/4 Sec 1/4 1/4 Sec MERCER ISLAND Quadrangle Tax No./Parcel No.7227801400 Plat/Block/Lot Acreage Supplemental Map(s) Coordinate Reference Projection: Datum: Easting: Northing: HARN (feet) Washington State Plane South 1224429 794611 Historic Inventory Report Thursday, October 28, 2010 Page 2 of 6 Description Narrative Historic Use:Domestic - Multiple Family House Current Use:Domestic - Multiple Family House Plan:Rectangle Stories:2 Structural System:Platform Frame Changes to Plan:Intact Changes to Interior:Unknown Changes to Original Cladding:Extensive Changes to Windows:Extensive Changes to Other:Not Applicable Other (specify): Style: Form/Type: Cladding: Foundation: Roof Type:Roof Material: Architecture/Landscape Architecture Study Unit Other Date of Construction: Architect:George W. Stoddard-Huggard & Associates Engineer: Property appears to meet criteria for the National Register of Historic Places:No Property is located in a potential historic district (National and/or local):No Property potentially contributes to a historic district (National and/or local):No Builder:Dahlgren Construction Company Veneer - Vinyl SidingModern Gable - Side Gable Asphalt / Composition - Shingle Concrete - Poured Multi-Family 1977 Remodel 1959 Built Date Historic Inventory Report Thursday, October 28, 2010 Page 3 of 6 The property has been evaluated according to the eligibility criteria for listing in the National Register of Historic Places (NRHP). Due to the many alterations, the integrity of the individual buildings and the complex as a whole is considered poor. The Sunset Terrace public housing complex resulted from federal investment in public housing during the postwar period and is associated with a well-known Seattle architect. However, it is a late example of its architectural type and its individual elements were substantially altered by rehabilitations in the 1970s and 1990s, such that they no longer appear to retain sufficient integrity to convey their historical significance. Based on our review, the property has poor integrity and does not appear eligible for listing in the NRHP individually or as a potential historic district. Stoddard’s design for Sunset Terrace appears to have been strongly influenced by the Garden City movement and exhibits features and characteristics of garden style apartments. All 27 buildings were arranged along curvilinear streets in locations to best take advantage of the original topography and create open, pleasing landscapes for residents. Throughout Sunset Terrace, each building is separated by open courtyard areas with outdoor space dedicated to individual housing units. At the rear of each unit, this space was originally identified by unit-specific metal revolving clotheslines. Additional design features included minimal ornamentation, aluminum windows, and varied exterior wall cladding of horizontal rustic cedar siding, vertical rough cedar channel siding, or resawn split cedar shake siding with some brick veneer. The Renton Housing Authority completed a comprehensive rehabilitation of Sunset Terrace in the 1970s, which resulted in the removal and replacement of many of these features. The original windows were replaced with new metal windows, unit doors were replaced, the revolving clotheslines were removed, and the original cedar wall claddings were replaced with vinyl siding. Subsequent changes occurred in the early 1990s when buildings in the complex were upgraded for ADA accessibility. Kitchens and bathrooms in the individual housing units were also substantially renovated at this time. The property was evaluated at a reconnaissance level in a cultural resources survey completed for the proposed Sunset Terrace Redevelopment Subarea in the City of Renton, King County, Washington. It is one of 27 buildings constructed by the Housing Authority of the City of Renton as part of the Sunset Terrace public housing complex authorized on June 28, 1958 and completed in 1959. Sunset Terrace consisted of a complex of 100 low-income housing units comprising both one- and two-story structures arranged along curvilinear streets. The complex was constructed by Seattle-based Dahlgren Construction Company according to designs by George W. Stoddard-Huggard & Associates. George W. Stoddard, a prominent Seattle architect and principal of the firm, is credited with the design of many well known public, private, and civic structures in the Seattle area, including such noted properties as the High School Memorial Stadium, the Green Lake Aqua Theater, and the Yesler Terrace Defense Housing Project. Stoddard retired in 1960, and the Sunset Terrace public housing complex is believed to have been one of his last commissions. Statement of Significance: Historic Inventory Report Thursday, October 28, 2010 Page 4 of 6 The property contains a one to two-story four unit apartment building constructed as part of the Sunset Terrace public housing complex in 1958-1959. Buildings in the complex were designed in one of six standard design types, each exhibiting Modern style elements. This building was constructed as a type “D” building. The building has a long rectangular plan and consists of platform frame wood construction on a poured concrete foundation. It has a very low pitch side gable roof clad with composition asphalt shingles and featuring slightly overhanging eaves with a wide fascia. Four small cylindrical, metal roof vents stand equally spaced along the roof ridge line. The exterior walls are clad with non-original horizontally applied vinyl siding. This siding replaced the building’s original vertically applied, rough cedar channel siding during rehabilitation of the building in the 1970s. The building has a northeast-southwest orientation and its primary (north) facade fronts Glennwood Avenue NE. The primary facade is symmetrically divided and consists of four sections, each comprising a single housing unit. The two center sections are two stories tall and the two outer sections are one story tall. On the first story, each section consists of a single door opening fit with a non-original paneled door, flanked by a wide tripartite picture window. The doors open onto poured concrete stoops connected to poured concrete sidewalks that lead to the street. On the second story, each center section is punctuated by a single, slightly shorter, tripartite picture window. The building’s rear elevation is similarly divided, each section containing a single door opening flanked by a small metal-sliding window and a tripartite picture window on the first story, and featuring a wide tripartite picture window and a small metal-sliding window on the second story. The building’s side elevations are unadorned. All of the building’s original windows were replaced with non-original metal windows in the 1970s. Other alterations to the building include the removal of original metal revolving clothes lines outside the rear entrance of each unit, and complete renovations of the building’s bathrooms and kitchens and ADA accessibility improvements in the early 1990s. Description of Physical Appearance: Historic Inventory Report Thursday, October 28, 2010 Page 5 of 6 Ochsner, Jeffery Karl, ed. Shaping Seattle Architecture: A Historical Guide to the Architects. Seattle, WA: University of Washington Press, 1998. Lord, Tom Forrester. Decent Housing: A Promise to Keep. Federal Housing Policy and its Impact on the City. Cambridge, MA: Schenkman Publishing Company, Inc., 1977. Madison, Charles A. Preface. In How the Other Half Lives. Jacob A. Riis. New York, NY: Dover Publications, Inc., 1971. __________. "Obituaries: George W. Stoddard." 29 September 1967:16. Seattle, WA. Rabinowitz, Alan. Urban Economics and Land Use in America: The Transformation of Cities in the Twentieth Century. Armonk, NY: M.E. Sharpe, Inc., 2004. The Seattle Times. "Seattle Firm Supported for Housing Job." 18 March 1959:44. Seattle, WA. Elenga, Maureen R. Seattle Architecture: A Walking Guide to Downtown. Seattle, WA: Seattle Architecture Foundation, 2007. Associated Press. "Tacoma Gets Housing Blues; To Renton It’s Not News." The Seattle Times. Seattle, WA, 29 June 1958. George W. Stoddard-Huggard & Associates. "Housing Authority of the City of Renton: Project Washington II-I, Renton Highlands, Renton, Washington." Construction Plans. Seattle, WA: George W. Stoddard- Huggard & Associates Architects & Engineers, 1958. On file with Renton Housing Authority, Renton, WA. Karolak, Eric J. "No Idea of Doing Anything Wonderful: The Labor-Crisis Origins of National Housing Policy and the Reconstruction of the Working-Class Community, 1917-1919." In From Tenemants to the Taylor Homes; In Search of an Urban Housing Policy in Twentieth-Century American. John F. Bauman, Roger Biles, Kristin M. Szylvian, eds. pp. 60-80. University Park, PA: Pennsylvania State University, 2000. Hanchett, Thomas W. "The Other 'Subsidized Housing': Federal Aid to Suburbanization, 1940-1960s." In From Tenements to the Taylor Homes; In Search of an Urban Housing Policy in Twentieth-Century American. John F. Bauman, Roger Biles, Kristin M. Szylvian, eds. Pp. 163-179. University Park, PA: Pennsylvania State University, 2000. Howard, Ebenezer. Garden Cities of Tomorrow. London: Swan Sonnenschein & Co., Ltd., 1902. Major Bibliographic References: Historic Inventory Report Thursday, October 28, 2010 Page 6 of 6 2010 North and West Elevations, Looking Southeast Photos East Elevation, Looking West 2010 East and North Elevations, Looking Southwest 2010 Historic Inventory Report Thursday, October 28, 2010 Page 1 of 4 Identification Hetzel, Christopher Survey Name:Date Recorded: Field Recorder: Owner's Name:Cole, Letty 10/06/2010 City: Classification:Building Resource Status:Comments: State:Zip: Within a District?No Contributing?No National Register: Local District: National Register District/Thematic Nomination Name: Owner Address: Survey/Inventory Not Eligible Eligibility Status: Determination Date: Determination Comments: Not Determined - SHPO 1/1/0001 Sunset Terrace Redevelopment Subarea 1052 Glennwood Ave NE, Renton, WA 98056 Location Field Site No.DAHP No. Historic Name: Common Name:1052 Glennwood Ave NE Property Address: Comments: King County T23R05E 09 Township/Range/EW Section 1/4 Sec 1/4 1/4 Sec MERCER ISLAND Quadrangle Tax No./Parcel No.7227801305 Plat/Block/Lot Acreage Supplemental Map(s) Coordinate Reference Projection: Datum: Easting: Northing: HARN (feet) Washington State Plane South 1224371 794787 Historic Inventory Report Thursday, October 28, 2010 Page 2 of 4 Description Narrative Historic Use:Domestic - Multiple Family House Current Use:Domestic - Multiple Family House Plan:Rectangle Stories:1 Structural System:Platform Frame Changes to Plan:Intact Changes to Interior:Unknown Changes to Original Cladding:Extensive Changes to Windows:Extensive Changes to Other:Not Applicable Other (specify): Style: Form/Type: Cladding: Foundation: Roof Type:Roof Material: Architecture/Landscape Architecture Study Unit Other Date of Construction: Architect: Engineer: Property appears to meet criteria for the National Register of Historic Places:No Property is located in a potential historic district (National and/or local):No Property potentially contributes to a historic district (National and/or local):No Builder: Metal - Aluminum SidingModern - Minimal Traditional Gable - Side Gable Asphalt / Composition - Shingle Concrete - Poured Multi-Family - Duplex 1943 Built Date The property was evaluated at a reconnaissance level in a cultural resources survey completed for the proposed Sunset Terrace Redevelopment Subarea in the City of Renton, King County, Washington. It was constructed in 1943, according to the King Count tax assessor. The original owner is unknown, as are the original architect and builder. Substantial changes have been made to the building’s fenestration and exterior wall cladding. The residence’s original windows were replaced with non-original metal windows and non-original metal siding was installed on the exterior walls. Because of these alterations, the residence’s integrity is considered poor. The property has been evaluated according to the eligibility criteria for listing in the National Register of Historic Places (NRHP). The reconnaissance-level survey revealed no evidence to suggest the building is historically significant due to associations with an important event or person. The building exhibits elements of the Modern style. However, it does not appear to embody characteristics or a method of construction that would warrant special recognition, and it is not located in a cohesive neighborhood or grouping. Based on our review, the property has poor integrity and does not appear eligible for listing in the NRHP individually or as a contributor to a potential historic district. Statement of Significance: Historic Inventory Report Thursday, October 28, 2010 Page 3 of 4 City of Renton, Department of Community Development. Community Profile. Renton, WA: Renton Department of Community Development, 1989. Slauson, Morda C. Renton From Coal to Jets. Renton, WA: Renton Historical Society, 2006. King County Tax Assessor Online Records. The Boeing Company, Renton Reporter, and City of Renton. Renton: The First Hundred Years, 1901-2001. Kent, WA: King County Journal Newspaper, 2001. Buerge, David M. Renton: Where the Water Took Wing. Chatsworth, CA: Windsor Publications, Inc., 1989. Major Bibliographic References: The property contains a one-story residential duplex with a rectangular plan and platform frame wood construction on a poured concrete foundation. The residence has a northwest-southeast orientation and fronts Glennwood Avenue NE on the southwest. The duplex was originally designed with elements of the Minimal Traditional style. It has a medium pitch side-gable roof with composition asphalt shingles and slightly overhanging eaves at the front and rear elevations. The exterior walls are clad with non-original metal siding. The primary facade is nearly symmetrically divided and four bays wide. Each bay is characterized by a large window opening fit with a non-original metal-frame picture window. One housing unit entrance is located at the facade’s northernmost bay. It is accessed by a small, raised wood porch. The entrance to the other housing unit entrance punctuates the building’s southeast elevation. It features a small porch with a raised wood-frame floor and sheltered by a projecting gable roof supported by wood posts. The fenestration consists of non-original metal fixed and sliding windows throughout the residence. Description of Physical Appearance: Historic Inventory Report Thursday, October 28, 2010 Page 4 of 4 2010 Northwest and Southwest Elevations, Looking Southeast Photos 2010 Southwest and Southeast Elevations, Looking Northeast Historic Inventory Report Thursday, October 28, 2010 Page 1 of 4 Identification Hetzel, Christopher Survey Name:Date Recorded: Field Recorder: Owner's Name:Chan NY 10/06/2010 City: Classification:Building Resource Status:Comments: State:Zip: Within a District?No Contributing?No National Register: Local District: National Register District/Thematic Nomination Name: Owner Address: Survey/Inventory Not Eligible Eligibility Status: Determination Date: Determination Comments: Not Determined - SHPO 1/1/0001 Sunset Terrace Redevelopment Subarea 1060 Glennwood Ave NE, Renton, WA 98056 Location Field Site No.DAHP No. Historic Name: Common Name:1060 Glennwood Ave NE Property Address: Comments: King County T23R05E 09 Township/Range/EW Section 1/4 Sec 1/4 1/4 Sec MERCER ISLAND Quadrangle Tax No./Parcel No.7227801310 Plat/Block/Lot Acreage Supplemental Map(s) Coordinate Reference Projection: Datum: Easting: Northing: HARN (feet) Washington State Plane South 1224315 794868 Historic Inventory Report Thursday, October 28, 2010 Page 2 of 4 Description Narrative Historic Use:Domestic - Multiple Family House Current Use:Domestic - Multiple Family House Plan:Rectangle Stories:1 Structural System:Platform Frame Changes to Plan:Intact Changes to Interior:Unknown Changes to Original Cladding:Extensive Changes to Windows:Moderate Changes to Other:Not Applicable Other (specify): Style: Form/Type: Cladding: Foundation: Roof Type:Roof Material: Architecture/Landscape Architecture Study Unit Other Date of Construction: Architect: Engineer: Property appears to meet criteria for the National Register of Historic Places:No Property is located in a potential historic district (National and/or local):No Property potentially contributes to a historic district (National and/or local):No Builder: Shingle - CoursedModern - Minimal Traditional Gable - Side Gable Asphalt / Composition - Shingle Concrete - Poured Multi-Family - Duplex 1943 Built Date The property was evaluated at a reconnaissance level in a cultural resources survey completed for the proposed Sunset Terrace Redevelopment Subarea in the City of Renton, King County, Washington. It was constructed in 1943, according to the King Count tax assessor. The original owner is unknown, as are the original architect and builder. Substantial changes have been made to the building’s fenestration and exterior wall cladding. Many of the residence’s original windows were replaced with non-original metal fixed and sliding windows and non-original coursed wood shingles replaced the original clapboard and vertical wood siding. Because of these alterations, the residence’s integrity is considered poor. The property has been evaluated according to the eligibility criteria for listing in the National Register of Historic Places (NRHP). The reconnaissance-level survey revealed no evidence to suggest the building is historically significant due to associations with an important event or person. The building exhibits elements of the Modern style. However, it does not appear to embody characteristics or a method of construction that would warrant special recognition, and it is not located in a cohesive neighborhood or grouping. Based on our review, the property has poor integrity and does not appear eligible for listing in the NRHP individually or as a contributor to a potential historic district. Statement of Significance: Historic Inventory Report Thursday, October 28, 2010 Page 3 of 4 City of Renton, Department of Community Development. Community Profile. Renton, WA: Renton Department of Community Development, 1989. Slauson, Morda C. Renton From Coal to Jets. Renton, WA: Renton Historical Society, 2006. King County Tax Assessor Online Records. The Boeing Company, Renton Reporter, and City of Renton. Renton: The First Hundred Years, 1901-2001. Kent, WA: King County Journal Newspaper, 2001. Buerge, David M. Renton: Where the Water Took Wing. Chatsworth, CA: Windsor Publications, Inc., 1989. Major Bibliographic References: The property contains a one-story residential duplex with a rectangular plan and platform frame wood construction on a poured concrete foundation. The residence has a northwest-southeast orientation and fronts Glennwood Avenue NE on the southwest. The duplex was originally designed with elements of the Minimal Traditional style. It has a medium pitch side-gable roof with composition asphalt shingles and slightly overhanging eaves at the front and rear elevations. The exterior walls are clad with non-original coursed wood shingles. The primary facade is nearly symmetrically divided and four bays wide. Each bay is characterized by a large window opening, which appears to original have contained a pair of double-hung sash windows. Only one pair of windows remains intact. All of the other windows have been replaced. One housing unit entrance is located at the facade’s northernmost bay. It is accessed by a small, raised wood porch. The entrance to the other housing unit entrance punctuates the building’s southeast elevation. The fenestration consists of a mixture of non-original fixed and metal sliding windows, with only a few original wood windows remaining. Description of Physical Appearance: Historic Inventory Report Thursday, October 28, 2010 Page 4 of 4 2010 West Elevation (North Half), Looking East Photos North Elevation (South Half), Looking East 2010 North and West Elevations, Looking Southeast 2010 Historic Inventory Report Thursday, October 28, 2010 Page 1 of 4 Identification Hetzel, Christopher PO Box 2316 Survey Name:Date Recorded: Field Recorder: Owner's Name:Renton Housing Authority 10/06/2010 City:Renton Classification:Building Resource Status:Comments: State:WA Zip:98056-0316 Within a District?No Contributing?No National Register: Local District: National Register District/Thematic Nomination Name: Owner Address: Survey/Inventory Not Eligible Eligibility Status: Determination Date: Determination Comments: Not Determined - SHPO 1/1/0001 Sunset Terrace Redevelopment Subarea 1139 Glennwood Ave NE, Renton, WA 98056 Location Field Site No.DAHP No. Historic Name: Common Name:1139 Glennwood Ave NE Property Address: Comments: King County T23R05E 09 Township/Range/EW Section 1/4 Sec 1/4 1/4 Sec MERCER ISLAND Quadrangle Tax No./Parcel No.7227801380 Plat/Block/Lot Acreage Supplemental Map(s) Coordinate Reference Projection: Datum: Easting: Northing: HARN (feet) Washington State Plane South 1224203 795198 Historic Inventory Report Thursday, October 28, 2010 Page 2 of 4 Description Narrative Historic Use:Domestic - Multiple Family House Current Use:Domestic - Multiple Family House Plan:Rectangle Stories:1 Structural System:Platform Frame Changes to Plan:Intact Changes to Interior:Unknown Changes to Original Cladding:Slight Changes to Windows:Extensive Changes to Other:Not Applicable Other (specify): Style: Form/Type: Cladding: Foundation: Roof Type:Roof Material: Architecture/Landscape Architecture Study Unit Other Date of Construction: Architect: Engineer: Property appears to meet criteria for the National Register of Historic Places:No Property is located in a potential historic district (National and/or local):No Property potentially contributes to a historic district (National and/or local):No Builder: Wood - Vertical Wood - ClapboardModern - Minimal Traditional Gable - Side Gable Asphalt / Composition - Shingle Concrete - Poured Multi-Family - Duplex 1943 Built Date The property was evaluated at a reconnaissance level in a cultural resources survey completed for the proposed Sunset Terrace Redevelopment Subarea in the City of Renton, King County, Washington. It was constructed in 1943, according to the King Count tax assessor. The original owner is unknown, as are the original architect and builder. Substantial changes have been made to the building’s fenestration and porches. The residence’s original windows were replaced with non-original metal sliding windows and non -original porches constructed at the entrances. Because of these alterations, the residence’s integrity is considered fair. The property has been evaluated according to the eligibility criteria for listing in the National Register of Historic Places (NRHP). The reconnaissance-level survey revealed no evidence to suggest the building is historically significant due to associations with an important event or person. The building exhibits elements of the Modern style. However, it does not appear to embody characteristics or a method of construction that would warrant special recognition, and it is not located in a cohesive neighborhood or grouping. Based on our review, the property has fair integrity and does not appear eligible for listing in the NRHP individually or as a contributor to a potential historic district. Statement of Significance: Historic Inventory Report Thursday, October 28, 2010 Page 3 of 4 City of Renton, Department of Community Development. Community Profile. Renton, WA: Renton Department of Community Development, 1989. Slauson, Morda C. Renton From Coal to Jets. Renton, WA: Renton Historical Society, 2006. King County Tax Assessor Online Records. The Boeing Company, Renton Reporter, and City of Renton. Renton: The First Hundred Years, 1901-2001. Kent, WA: King County Journal Newspaper, 2001. Buerge, David M. Renton: Where the Water Took Wing. Chatsworth, CA: Windsor Publications, Inc., 1989. Major Bibliographic References: The property contains a one-story residential duplex with a rectangular plan and platform frame wood construction on a poured concrete foundation. The residence has a north-south orientation and fronts Glennwood Avenue NE on the east. The duplex was originally designed with elements of the Minimal Traditional style. It has a medium pitch side-gable roof with composition asphalt shingles and slightly overhanging eaves at the front and rear elevations. The exterior walls are clad with a band of original vertical wood siding below a course of original, horizontal clapboard with the division occurring at the lower sills of the residence’s windows. The primary facade is nearly symmetrically divided and four bays wide. Each bay is characterized by a large window opening. The openings are each fit with a non-original metal sliding window. One housing unit entrance is located at the facade’s northernmost bay. It is accessed by a non-original, raised wood porch. The entrance to the other housing unit entrance punctuates the building’s south elevation. The fenestration consists of a non-original metal sliding windows throughout the residence. Description of Physical Appearance: Historic Inventory Report Thursday, October 28, 2010 Page 4 of 4 2010 East Elevation, Looking Northwest Photos 2010 East Elevation, Looking Southwest Historic Inventory Report Thursday, October 28, 2010 Page 1 of 7 Identification Hetzel, Christopher PO Box 2316 Survey Name:Date Recorded: Field Recorder: Owner's Name:Renton Housing Authority 10/06/2010 City:Renton Classification:Building Resource Status:Comments: State:WA Zip:98056-0316 Within a District?No Contributing?No National Register: Local District: National Register District/Thematic Nomination Name: Owner Address: Survey/Inventory Not Eligible Eligibility Status: Determination Date: Determination Comments: Not Determined - SHPO 1/1/0001 Sunset Terrace Redevelopment Subarea Sunset Terrace Public Housing Complex 965 Harrington Ave NE, Renton, WA 98056 Location Field Site No.DAHP No. Historic Name: Common Name:965 Harrington Ave NE Property Address: Comments: King County T23R05E 09 Township/Range/EW Section 1/4 Sec 1/4 1/4 Sec RENTON Quadrangle Tax No./Parcel No.7227801055 Plat/Block/Lot Acreage Supplemental Map(s) Coordinate Reference Projection: Datum: Easting: Northing: HARN (feet) Washington State Plane South 1224549 794260 Historic Inventory Report Thursday, October 28, 2010 Page 2 of 7 Description Narrative Historic Use:Domestic - Multiple Family House Current Use:Domestic - Multiple Family House Plan:Rectangle Stories:2 Structural System:Platform Frame Changes to Plan:Intact Changes to Interior:Unknown Changes to Original Cladding:Extensive Changes to Windows:Extensive Changes to Other:Not Applicable Other (specify): Style: Form/Type: Cladding: Foundation: Roof Type:Roof Material: Architecture/Landscape Architecture Study Unit Other Date of Construction: Architect:George W. Stoddard-Huggard & Associates Engineer: Property appears to meet criteria for the National Register of Historic Places:No Property is located in a potential historic district (National and/or local):No Property potentially contributes to a historic district (National and/or local):No Builder:Dahlgren Construction Company Veneer - Vinyl SidingModern Gable - Side Gable Asphalt / Composition - Shingle Concrete - Poured Multi-Family 1977 Remodel 1959 Built Date Historic Inventory Report Thursday, October 28, 2010 Page 3 of 7 The property has been evaluated according to the eligibility criteria for listing in the National Register of Historic Places (NRHP). Due to the many alterations, the integrity of the individual buildings and the complex as a whole is considered poor. The Sunset Terrace public housing complex resulted from federal investment in public housing during the postwar period and is associated with a well-known Seattle architect. However, it is a late example of its architectural type and its individual elements were substantially altered by rehabilitations in the 1970s and 1990s, such that they no longer appear to retain sufficient integrity to convey their historical significance. Based on our review, the property has poor integrity and does not appear eligible for listing in the NRHP individually or as a potential historic district. Stoddard’s design for Sunset Terrace appears to have been strongly influenced by the Garden City movement and exhibits features and characteristics of garden style apartments. All 27 buildings were arranged along curvilinear streets in locations to best take advantage of the original topography and create open, pleasing landscapes for residents. Throughout Sunset Terrace, each building is separated by open courtyard areas with outdoor space dedicated to individual housing units. At the rear of each unit, this space was originally identified by unit-specific metal revolving clotheslines. Additional design features included minimal ornamentation, aluminum windows, and varied exterior wall cladding of horizontal rustic cedar siding, vertical rough cedar channel siding, or resawn split cedar shake siding with some brick veneer. The Renton Housing Authority completed a comprehensive rehabilitation of Sunset Terrace in the 1970s, which resulted in the removal and replacement of many of these features. The original windows were replaced with new metal windows, unit doors were replaced, the revolving clotheslines were removed, and the original cedar wall claddings were replaced with vinyl siding. Subsequent changes occurred in the early 1990s when buildings in the complex were upgraded for ADA accessibility. Kitchens and bathrooms in the individual housing units were also substantially renovated at this time. The property was evaluated at a reconnaissance level in a cultural resources survey completed for the proposed Sunset Terrace Redevelopment Subarea in the City of Renton, King County, Washington. It is one of 27 buildings constructed by the Housing Authority of the City of Renton as part of the Sunset Terrace public housing complex authorized on June 28, 1958 and completed in 1959. Sunset Terrace consisted of a complex of 100 low-income housing units comprising both one- and two-story structures arranged along curvilinear streets. The complex was constructed by Seattle-based Dahlgren Construction Company according to designs by George W. Stoddard-Huggard & Associates. George W. Stoddard, a prominent Seattle architect and principal of the firm, is credited with the design of many well known public, private, and civic structures in the Seattle area, including such noted properties as the High School Memorial Stadium, the Green Lake Aqua Theater, and the Yesler Terrace Defense Housing Project. Stoddard retired in 1960, and the Sunset Terrace public housing complex is believed to have been one of his last commissions. Statement of Significance: Historic Inventory Report Thursday, October 28, 2010 Page 4 of 7 The property contains a two-story four unit apartment building constructed as part of the Sunset Terrace public housing complex in 1958-1959. Buildings in the complex were designed in one of six standard design types, each exhibiting Modern style elements. This building was constructed as a type “E” building. The building has a long rectangular plan and consists of platform frame wood construction on a poured concrete foundation. It has a very low pitch side gable roof clad with composition asphalt shingles and featuring slightly overhanging eaves with a wide fascia. Four small cylindrical, metal roof vents stand equally spaced along the roof ridge line. The exterior walls are clad with non-original horizontally applied vinyl siding. This siding replaced the building’s original resawn split cedar shake siding on the first story and vertically applied, rough cedar channel siding during rehabilitation of the building in the 1970s. The building has a east-west orientation and its primary (east) facade fronts Harrington Avenue NE. The primary facade is symmetrically divided and consists of four nearly identical sections, each comprising a single housing unit. On the first story, each section consists of a single door opening fit with a non-original paneled door, flanked by a wide tripartite picture window. Two cantilevered shed roofs extend between the sections sheltering each pair of door openings. The doors open onto poured concrete stoops connected to poured concrete sidewalks that lead to the street. On the second story, each section is punctuated by a slightly shorter, tripartite picture window. The building’s rear elevation is similarly divided, each section containing a single door opening flanked by two small windows on the first story, and featuring a wide tripartite picture window and another small window on the second story. The two center sections on the second story projects from the elevation, cantilevered over the first story. The building’s side elevations are unadorned. All of the building’s original windows were replaced with non- original metal windows in the 1970s. Other alterations to the building include the removal of original metal revolving clothes lines outside the rear entrance of each unit, and complete renovations of the building’s bathrooms and kitchens and ADA accessibility improvements in the early 1990s. Description of Physical Appearance: Historic Inventory Report Thursday, October 28, 2010 Page 5 of 7 - Ochsner, Jeffery Karl, ed. Shaping Seattle Architecture: A Historical Guide to the Architects. Seattle, WA: University of Washington Press, 1998. - Lord, Tom Forrester. Decent Housing: A Promise to Keep. Federal Housing Policy and its Impact on the City. Cambridge, MA: Schenkman Publishing Company, Inc., 1977. - Madison, Charles A. Preface. In How the Other Half Lives. Jacob A. Riis. New York, NY: Dover Publications, Inc., 1971. - __________. Obituaries: George W. Stoddard. 29 September 1967:16. Seattle, WA. Rabinowitz, Alan. Urban Economics and Land Use in America: The Transformation of Cities in the Twentieth Century. Armonk, NY: M.E. Sharpe, Inc., 2004. - The Seattle Times. Seattle Firm Supported for Housing Job. 18 March 1959:44. Seattle, WA. - Elenga, Maureen R. Seattle Architecture: A Walking Guide to Downtown. Seattle, WA: Seattle Architecture Foundation, 2007. - Associated Press. Tacoma Gets Housing Blues; To Renton It’s Not News. The Seattle Times. Seattle, WA, 29 June 1958. - George W. Stoddard-Huggard & Associates. Housing Authority of the City of Renton: Project Washington II -I, Renton Highlands, Renton, Washington. Construction Plans. Seattle, WA: George W. Stoddard-Huggard & Associates Architects & Engineers, 1958. On file with Renton Housing Authority, Renton, WA. - Karolak, Eric J. No Idea of Doing Anything Wonderful: The Labor-Crisis Origins of National Housing Policy and the Reconstruction of the Working-Class Community, 1917-1919. In From Tenemants to the Taylor Homes; In Search of an Urban Housing Policy in Twentieth-Century American. John F. Bauman, Roger Biles, Kristin M. Szylvian, eds. pp. 60-80. University Park, PA: Pennsylvania State University, 2000. - Hanchett, Thomas W. The Other 'Subsidized Housing': Federal Aid to Suburbanization, 1940-1960s. In From Tenements to the Taylor Homes; In Search of an Urban Housing Policy in Twentieth-Century American. John F. Bauman, Roger Biles, Kristin M. Szylvian, eds. Pp. 163-179. University Park, PA: Pennsylvania State University, 2000. - Howard, Ebenezer. Garden Cities of Tomorrow. London: Swan Sonnenschein & Co., Ltd., 1902. Major Bibliographic References: Historic Inventory Report Thursday, October 28, 2010 Page 6 of 7 2010 West Elevation, Looking Southeast East Elevation, Looking Northwest 2010 Photos 2010 North Elevation, Looking South East Elevation, Looking Southwest 2010 Historic Inventory Report Thursday, October 28, 2010 Page 7 of 7 2010 East Elevation (Detail), Looking West 2010 South and East Elevations, Looking Northwest   Historic Inventory Report Thursday, October 28, 2010 Page 1 of 6 Identification Hetzel, Christopher PO Box 2316 Survey Name:Date Recorded: Field Recorder: Owner's Name:Renton Housing Authority 10/06/2010 City:Renton Classification:Building Resource Status:Comments: State:WA Zip:98056-0316 Within a District?No Contributing?No National Register: Local District: National Register District/Thematic Nomination Name: Owner Address: Survey/Inventory Not Eligible Eligibility Status: Determination Date: Determination Comments: Not Determined - SHPO 1/1/0001 Sunset Terrace Redevelopment Subarea Sunset Terrace Public Housing Complex 966 Harrington Ave NE, Renton, WA 98056 Location Field Site No.DAHP No. Historic Name: Common Name:966 Harrington Ave NE Property Address: Comments: King County T23R05E 09 Township/Range/EW Section 1/4 Sec 1/4 1/4 Sec RENTON Quadrangle Tax No./Parcel No.7227801055 Plat/Block/Lot Acreage Supplemental Map(s) Coordinate Reference Projection: Datum: Easting: Northing: HARN (feet) Washington State Plane South 1224676 794318 Historic Inventory Report Thursday, October 28, 2010 Page 2 of 6 Description Narrative Historic Use:Domestic - Multiple Family House Current Use:Domestic - Multiple Family House Plan:Rectangle Stories:2 Structural System:Platform Frame Changes to Plan:Intact Changes to Interior:Unknown Changes to Original Cladding:Extensive Changes to Windows:Extensive Changes to Other:Not Applicable Other (specify): Style: Form/Type: Cladding: Foundation: Roof Type:Roof Material: Architecture/Landscape Architecture Study Unit Other Date of Construction: Architect:George W. Stoddard-Huggard & Associates Engineer: Property appears to meet criteria for the National Register of Historic Places:No Property is located in a potential historic district (National and/or local):No Property potentially contributes to a historic district (National and/or local):No Builder:Dahlgren Construction Company Veneer - Vinyl SidingModern Gable - Side Gable Asphalt / Composition - Shingle Concrete - Poured Multi-Family 1977 Remodel 1959 Built Date Historic Inventory Report Thursday, October 28, 2010 Page 3 of 6 The property has been evaluated according to the eligibility criteria for listing in the National Register of Historic Places (NRHP). Due to the many alterations, the integrity of the individual buildings and the complex as a whole is considered poor. The Sunset Terrace public housing complex resulted from federal investment in public housing during the postwar period and is associated with a well-known Seattle architect. However, it is a late example of its architectural type and its individual elements were substantially altered by rehabilitations in the 1970s and 1990s, such that they no longer appear to retain sufficient integrity to convey their historical significance. Based on our review, the property has poor integrity and does not appear eligible for listing in the NRHP individually or as a potential historic district. Stoddard’s design for Sunset Terrace appears to have been strongly influenced by the Garden City movement and exhibits features and characteristics of garden style apartments. All 27 buildings were arranged along curvilinear streets in locations to best take advantage of the original topography and create open, pleasing landscapes for residents. Throughout Sunset Terrace, each building is separated by open courtyard areas with outdoor space dedicated to individual housing units. At the rear of each unit, this space was originally identified by unit-specific metal revolving clotheslines. Additional design features included minimal ornamentation, aluminum windows, and varied exterior wall cladding of horizontal rustic cedar siding, vertical rough cedar channel siding, or resawn split cedar shake siding with some brick veneer. The Renton Housing Authority completed a comprehensive rehabilitation of Sunset Terrace in the 1970s, which resulted in the removal and replacement of many of these features. The original windows were replaced with new metal windows, unit doors were replaced, the revolving clotheslines were removed, and the original cedar wall claddings were replaced with vinyl siding. Subsequent changes occurred in the early 1990s when buildings in the complex were upgraded for ADA accessibility. Kitchens and bathrooms in the individual housing units were also substantially renovated at this time. The property was evaluated at a reconnaissance level in a cultural resources survey completed for the proposed Sunset Terrace Redevelopment Subarea in the City of Renton, King County, Washington. It is one of 27 buildings constructed by the Housing Authority of the City of Renton as part of the Sunset Terrace public housing complex authorized on June 28, 1958 and completed in 1959. Sunset Terrace consisted of a complex of 100 low-income housing units comprising both one- and two-story structures arranged along curvilinear streets. The complex was constructed by Seattle-based Dahlgren Construction Company according to designs by George W. Stoddard-Huggard & Associates. George W. Stoddard, a prominent Seattle architect and principal of the firm, is credited with the design of many well known public, private, and civic structures in the Seattle area, including such noted properties as the High School Memorial Stadium, the Green Lake Aqua Theater, and the Yesler Terrace Defense Housing Project. Stoddard retired in 1960, and the Sunset Terrace public housing complex is believed to have been one of his last commissions. Statement of Significance: Historic Inventory Report Thursday, October 28, 2010 Page 4 of 6 The property contains a two-story four unit apartment building constructed as part of the Sunset Terrace public housing complex in 1958-1959. Buildings in the complex were designed in one of six standard design types, each exhibiting Modern style elements. This building was constructed as a type “E” building. The building has a long rectangular plan and consists of platform frame wood construction on a poured concrete foundation. It has a very low pitch side gable roof clad with composition asphalt shingles and featuring slightly overhanging eaves with a wide fascia. Four small cylindrical, metal roof vents stand equally spaced along the roof ridge line. The exterior walls are clad with non-original horizontally applied vinyl siding. This siding replaced the building’s original resawn split cedar shakes on the first story and vertically applied, rough cedar channel siding on the second story during rehabilitation of the building in the 1970s. The building has a west-east orientation and its primary (west) facade fronts Harrington Avenue NE. The primary facade is symmetrically divided and consists of four nearly identical sections, each comprising a single housing unit. On the first story, each section consists of a single door opening fit with a non-original paneled door, flanked by a wide tripartite picture window. Two cantilevered shed roofs extend between the sections sheltering each pair of door openings. The doors open onto poured concrete stoops connected to poured concrete sidewalks that lead to the street. On the second story, each section is punctuated by a slightly shorter, tripartite picture window. The building’s rear elevation is similarly divided, each section containing a single door opening flanked by two small windows on the first story, and featuring a wide tripartite picture window and another small window on the second story. The two center sections on the second story projects from the elevation, cantilevered over the first story. The building’s side elevations are unadorned. All of the building’s original windows were replaced with non- original metal windows in the 1970s. Other alterations to the building include the removal of original metal revolving clothes lines outside the rear entrance of each unit, and complete renovations of the building’s bathrooms and kitchens and ADA accessibility improvements in the early 1990s. Description of Physical Appearance: Historic Inventory Report Thursday, October 28, 2010 Page 5 of 6 Ochsner, Jeffery Karl, ed. Shaping Seattle Architecture: A Historical Guide to the Architects. Seattle, WA: University of Washington Press, 1998. Lord, Tom Forrester. Decent Housing: A Promise to Keep. Federal Housing Policy and its Impact on the City. Cambridge, MA: Schenkman Publishing Company, Inc., 1977. Madison, Charles A. Preface. In How the Other Half Lives. Jacob A. Riis. New York, NY: Dover Publications, Inc., 1971. __________. "Obituaries: George W. Stoddard." 29 September 1967:16. Seattle, WA. Rabinowitz, Alan. Urban Economics and Land Use in America: The Transformation of Cities in the Twentieth Century. Armonk, NY: M.E. Sharpe, Inc., 2004. The Seattle Times. "Seattle Firm Supported for Housing Job." 18 March 1959:44. Seattle, WA. Elenga, Maureen R. Seattle Architecture: A Walking Guide to Downtown. Seattle, WA: Seattle Architecture Foundation, 2007. Associated Press. "Tacoma Gets Housing Blues; To Renton It’s Not News." The Seattle Times. Seattle, WA, 29 June 1958. George W. Stoddard-Huggard & Associates. "Housing Authority of the City of Renton: Project Washington II-I, Renton Highlands, Renton, Washington." Construction Plans. Seattle, WA: George W. Stoddard- Huggard & Associates Architects & Engineers, 1958. On file with Renton Housing Authority, Renton, WA. Karolak, Eric J. "No Idea of Doing Anything Wonderful: The Labor-Crisis Origins of National Housing Policy and the Reconstruction of the Working-Class Community, 1917-1919." In From Tenemants to the Taylor Homes; In Search of an Urban Housing Policy in Twentieth-Century American. John F. Bauman, Roger Biles, Kristin M. Szylvian, eds. pp. 60-80. University Park, PA: Pennsylvania State University, 2000. Hanchett, Thomas W. "The Other 'Subsidized Housing': Federal Aid to Suburbanization, 1940-1960s." In From Tenements to the Taylor Homes; In Search of an Urban Housing Policy in Twentieth-Century American. John F. Bauman, Roger Biles, Kristin M. Szylvian, eds. Pp. 163-179. University Park, PA: Pennsylvania State University, 2000. Howard, Ebenezer. Garden Cities of Tomorrow. London: Swan Sonnenschein & Co., Ltd., 1902. Major Bibliographic References: Historic Inventory Report Thursday, October 28, 2010 Page 6 of 6 South and West Elevations, Looking East 2010 North and West Elevations, Looking Southeast 2010 Photos East Elevation, Looking Southwest 2010 West Elevation, Looking Northeast 2010 Historic Inventory Report Thursday, October 28, 2010 Page 1 of 7 Identification Hetzel, Christopher PO Box 2316 Survey Name:Date Recorded: Field Recorder: Owner's Name:Renton Housing Authority 10/06/2010 City:Renton Classification:Building Resource Status:Comments: State:WA Zip:98056-0316 Within a District?No Contributing?No National Register: Local District: National Register District/Thematic Nomination Name: Owner Address: Survey/Inventory Not Eligible Eligibility Status: Determination Date: Determination Comments: Not Determined - SHPO 1/1/0001 Sunset Terrace Redevelopment Subarea Sunset Terrace Public Housing Complex 970 Harrington Ave NE, Renton, WA 98056 Location Field Site No.DAHP No. Historic Name: Common Name:970 Harrington Ave NE Property Address: Comments: King County T23R05E 09 Township/Range/EW Section 1/4 Sec 1/4 1/4 Sec RENTON Quadrangle Tax No./Parcel No.7227801085 Plat/Block/Lot Acreage Supplemental Map(s) Coordinate Reference Projection: Datum: Easting: Northing: HARN (feet) Washington State Plane South 1224611 794495 Historic Inventory Report Thursday, October 28, 2010 Page 2 of 7 Description Narrative Historic Use:Social - Clubhouse Current Use:Social - Clubhouse Plan:Rectangle Stories:2 Structural System:Platform Frame Changes to Plan:Moderate Changes to Interior:Unknown Changes to Original Cladding:Extensive Changes to Windows:Extensive Changes to Other:Extensive Other (specify):2nd story addit Style: Form/Type: Cladding: Foundation: Roof Type:Roof Material: Architecture/Landscape Architecture Study Unit Other Date of Construction: Architect:George W. Stoddard-Huggard & Associates Engineer: Property appears to meet criteria for the National Register of Historic Places:No Property is located in a potential historic district (National and/or local):No Property potentially contributes to a historic district (National and/or local):No Builder:Dahlgren Construction Company Veneer - Vinyl Siding BrickModern Gable - Side Gable Asphalt / Composition - Shingle Concrete - Poured Other 1977 Remodel 1959 Built Date Historic Inventory Report Thursday, October 28, 2010 Page 3 of 7 The property has been evaluated according to the eligibility criteria for listing in the National Register of Historic Places (NRHP). Due to the many alterations, the integrity of the individual buildings and the complex as a whole is considered poor. The Sunset Terrace public housing complex resulted from federal investment in public housing during the postwar period and is associated with a well-known Seattle architect. However, it is a late example of its architectural type and its individual elements were substantially altered by rehabilitations in the 1970s and 1990s, such that they no longer appear to retain sufficient integrity to convey their historical significance. Based on our review, the property has poor integrity and does not appear eligible for listing in the NRHP individually or as a potential historic district. Stoddard’s design for Sunset Terrace appears to have been strongly influenced by the Garden City movement and exhibits features and characteristics of garden style apartments. All 27 buildings were arranged along curvilinear streets in locations to best take advantage of the original topography and create open, pleasing landscapes for residents. Throughout Sunset Terrace, each building is separated by open courtyard areas with outdoor space dedicated to individual housing units. At the rear of each unit, this space was originally identified by unit-specific metal revolving clotheslines. Additional design features included minimal ornamentation, aluminum windows, and varied exterior wall cladding of horizontal rustic cedar siding, vertical rough cedar channel siding, or resawn split cedar shake siding with some brick veneer. The Renton Housing Authority completed a comprehensive rehabilitation of Sunset Terrace in the 1970s, which resulted in the removal and replacement of many of these features. The original windows were replaced with new metal windows, unit doors were replaced, the revolving clotheslines were removed, and the original cedar wall claddings were replaced with vinyl siding. Subsequent changes occurred in the early 1990s when buildings in the complex were upgraded for ADA accessibility. Kitchens and bathrooms in the individual housing units were also substantially renovated at this time. In addition to these changes, the community building was also expanded with the construction of a second story addition and its length extended the the addition of an additional bay on the north elevation. The property was evaluated at a reconnaissance level in a cultural resources survey completed for the proposed Sunset Terrace Redevelopment Subarea in the City of Renton, King County, Washington. It is one of 27 buildings constructed by the Housing Authority of the City of Renton as part of the Sunset Terrace public housing complex authorized on June 28, 1958 and completed in 1959. Sunset Terrace consisted of a complex of 100 low-income housing units comprising both one- and two-story structures arranged along curvilinear streets. This building was constructed to serve as the complex's community center or social hall. The complex was constructed by Seattle-based Dahlgren Construction Company according to designs by George W. Stoddard-Huggard & Associates. George W. Stoddard, a prominent Seattle architect and principal of the firm, is credited with the design of many well known public, private, and civic structures in the Seattle area, including such noted properties as the High School Memorial Stadium, the Green Lake Aqua Theater, and the Yesler Terrace Defense Housing Project. Stoddard retired in 1960, and the Sunset Terrace public housing complex is believed to have been one of his last commissions. Statement of Significance: Historic Inventory Report Thursday, October 28, 2010 Page 4 of 7 The property contains a one to two-story administration and community building constructed as part of the Sunset Terrace public housing complex in 1958-1959. This building is the only structure in the complex not designed in one of six standard design types. However, it exhibits many of the same Modern style elements. The building was originally constructed as a one-story building, but was substantially rehabilitated in the late 1970s. The building was lengthened and the existing second story was added at this time. It has a long rectangular plan and consists of platform frame wood construction on a poured concrete foundation. Both the first and second stories have low pitch side gable roofs clad with composition asphalt shingles and featuring slightly overhanging eaves with a wide fascia. On the first story, the exterior walls are clad with a brick veneer. Non-original vinyl siding clads the second story. This siding replaced the building’s original cedar siding during the late 1970s rehabilitation. The building has a west-east orientation and its primary (west) facade fronts Harrington Avenue NE. The primary (west) facade is asymmetrically divided and eight bays wide. The bays are evenly divided into to discernible sections. The southernmost section is one-story tall and is characterized by a series of original, full height window openings. The windows, which were replaced during the late 1970s rehabilitation, consist of large, metal-frame, two-over-two, fixed windows with a lower slider. The northern section is two-stories tall and is characterized by three garage door openings and a pedestrian door on the first story and three large, non-original, one-over-three light picture windows on the second story. The building’s original one- story roof forms a project eave between first and second stories, and the northernmost bay was added during the late 1970s rehabilitation. A large, wraparound, covered patio area is located on the building’s south and rear elevation. Paved parking areas exist at both the front and rear elevations. Description of Physical Appearance: Historic Inventory Report Thursday, October 28, 2010 Page 5 of 7 Ochsner, Jeffery Karl, ed. Shaping Seattle Architecture: A Historical Guide to the Architects. Seattle, WA: University of Washington Press, 1998. Lord, Tom Forrester. Decent Housing: A Promise to Keep. Federal Housing Policy and its Impact on the City. Cambridge, MA: Schenkman Publishing Company, Inc., 1977. Madison, Charles A. Preface. In How the Other Half Lives. Jacob A. Riis. New York, NY: Dover Publications, Inc., 1971. __________. Obituaries: George W. Stoddard. 29 September 1967:16. Seattle, WA. Rabinowitz, Alan. Urban Economics and Land Use in America: The Transformation of Cities in the Twentieth Century. Armonk, NY: M.E. Sharpe, Inc., 2004. The Seattle Times. Seattle Firm Supported for Housing Job. 18 March 1959:44. Seattle, WA. Elenga, Maureen R. Seattle Architecture: A Walking Guide to Downtown. Seattle, WA: Seattle Architecture Foundation, 2007. Associated Press. Tacoma Gets Housing Blues; To Renton It’s Not News. The Seattle Times. Seattle, WA, 29 June 1958. George W. Stoddard-Huggard & Associates. Housing Authority of the City of Renton: Project Washington II -I, Renton Highlands, Renton, Washington. Construction Plans. Seattle, WA: George W. Stoddard-Huggard & Associates Architects & Engineers, 1958. On file with Renton Housing Authority, Renton, WA. Karolak, Eric J. No Idea of Doing Anything Wonderful: The Labor-Crisis Origins of National Housing Policy and the Reconstruction of the Working-Class Community, 1917-1919. In From Tenemants to the Taylor Homes; In Search of an Urban Housing Policy in Twentieth-Century American. John F. Bauman, Roger Biles, Kristin M. Szylvian, eds. pp. 60-80. University Park, PA: Pennsylvania State University, 2000. Hanchett, Thomas W. The Other 'Subsidized Housing': Federal Aid to Suburbanization, 1940-1960s. In From Tenements to the Taylor Homes; In Search of an Urban Housing Policy in Twentieth-Century American. John F. Bauman, Roger Biles, Kristin M. Szylvian, eds. Pp. 163-179. University Park, PA: Pennsylvania State University, 2000. Howard, Ebenezer. Garden Cities of Tomorrow. London: Swan Sonnenschein & Co., Ltd., 1902. Major Bibliographic References: Historic Inventory Report Thursday, October 28, 2010 Page 6 of 7 2010 South and East Elevations, Looking Northwest South Elevation, Looking Northeast 2010 Photos 2010 2010 South Elevation, Looking North Historic Inventory Report Thursday, October 28, 2010 Page 7 of 7 2010 West Elevation (Detail), Looking East West Elevation, Looking Southeast 2010 South and East Elevations, Looking Northwest 2010   Historic Inventory Report Thursday, October 28, 2010 Page 1 of 6 Identification Hetzel, Christopher PO Box 2316 Survey Name:Date Recorded: Field Recorder: Owner's Name:Renton Housing Authority 10/06/2010 City:Renton Classification:Building Resource Status:Comments: State:WA Zip:98056-0316 Within a District?No Contributing?No National Register: Local District: National Register District/Thematic Nomination Name: Owner Address: Survey/Inventory Not Eligible Eligibility Status: Determination Date: Determination Comments: Not Determined - SHPO 1/1/0001 Sunset Terrace Redevelopment Subarea Sunset Terrace Public Housing Complex 975 Harrington Ave NE, Renton, WA 98056 Location Field Site No.DAHP No. Historic Name: Common Name:975 Harrington Ave NE Property Address: Comments: King County T23R05E 09 Township/Range/EW Section 1/4 Sec 1/4 1/4 Sec MERCER ISLAND Quadrangle Tax No./Parcel No.7227801400 Plat/Block/Lot Acreage Supplemental Map(s) Coordinate Reference Projection: Datum: Easting: Northing: HARN (feet) Washington State Plane South 1224472 794512 Historic Inventory Report Thursday, October 28, 2010 Page 2 of 6 Description Narrative Historic Use:Domestic - Multiple Family House Current Use:Domestic - Multiple Family House Plan:Rectangle Stories:2 Structural System:Platform Frame Changes to Plan:Intact Changes to Interior:Unknown Changes to Original Cladding:Extensive Changes to Windows:Extensive Changes to Other:Not Applicable Other (specify): Style: Form/Type: Cladding: Foundation: Roof Type:Roof Material: Architecture/Landscape Architecture Study Unit Other Date of Construction: Architect:George W. Stoddard-Huggard & Associates Engineer: Property appears to meet criteria for the National Register of Historic Places:No Property is located in a potential historic district (National and/or local):No Property potentially contributes to a historic district (National and/or local):No Builder:Dahlgren Construction Company Brick Veneer - Vinyl SidingModern Gable - Side Gable Asphalt / Composition - Shingle Concrete - Poured Multi-Family 1977 Remodel 1959 Built Date Historic Inventory Report Thursday, October 28, 2010 Page 3 of 6 The property has been evaluated according to the eligibility criteria for listing in the National Register of Historic Places (NRHP). Due to the many alterations, the integrity of the individual buildings and the complex as a whole is considered poor. The Sunset Terrace public housing complex resulted from federal investment in public housing during the postwar period and is associated with a well-known Seattle architect. However, it is a late example of its architectural type and its individual elements were substantially altered by rehabilitations in the 1970s and 1990s, such that they no longer appear to retain sufficient integrity to convey their historical significance. Based on our review, the property has poor integrity and does not appear eligible for listing in the NRHP individually or as a potential historic district. Stoddard’s design for Sunset Terrace appears to have been strongly influenced by the Garden City movement and exhibits features and characteristics of garden style apartments. All 27 buildings were arranged along curvilinear streets in locations to best take advantage of the original topography and create open, pleasing landscapes for residents. Throughout Sunset Terrace, each building is separated by open courtyard areas with outdoor space dedicated to individual housing units. At the rear of each unit, this space was originally identified by unit-specific metal revolving clotheslines. Additional design features included minimal ornamentation, aluminum windows, and varied exterior wall cladding of horizontal rustic cedar siding, vertical rough cedar channel siding, or resawn split cedar shake siding with some brick veneer. The Renton Housing Authority completed a comprehensive rehabilitation of Sunset Terrace in the 1970s, which resulted in the removal and replacement of many of these features. The original windows were replaced with new metal windows, unit doors were replaced, the revolving clotheslines were removed, and the original cedar wall claddings were replaced with vinyl siding. Subsequent changes occurred in the early 1990s when buildings in the complex were upgraded for ADA accessibility. Kitchens and bathrooms in the individual housing units were also substantially renovated at this time. The property was evaluated at a reconnaissance level in a cultural resources survey completed for the proposed Sunset Terrace Redevelopment Subarea in the City of Renton, King County, Washington. It is one of 27 buildings constructed by the Housing Authority of the City of Renton as part of the Sunset Terrace public housing complex authorized on June 28, 1958 and completed in 1959. Sunset Terrace consisted of a complex of 100 low-income housing units comprising both one- and two-story structures arranged along curvilinear streets. The complex was constructed by Seattle-based Dahlgren Construction Company according to designs by George W. Stoddard-Huggard & Associates. George W. Stoddard, a prominent Seattle architect and principal of the firm, is credited with the design of many well known public, private, and civic structures in the Seattle area, including such noted properties as the High School Memorial Stadium, the Green Lake Aqua Theater, and the Yesler Terrace Defense Housing Project. Stoddard retired in 1960, and the Sunset Terrace public housing complex is believed to have been one of his last commissions. Statement of Significance: Historic Inventory Report Thursday, October 28, 2010 Page 4 of 6 The property contains a two-story four unit apartment building constructed as part of the Sunset Terrace public housing complex in 1958-1959. Buildings in the complex were designed in one of six standard design types, each exhibiting Modern style elements. This building was constructed as a type “F” building. The building has a long rectangular plan and consists of platform frame wood construction on a poured concrete foundation. It has a very low pitch side gable roof clad with composition asphalt shingles and featuring slightly overhanging eaves with a wide fascia. Four small cylindrical, metal roof vents stand equally spaced along the roof ridge line. The exterior walls are clad with non-original horizontally applied vinyl siding. This siding replaced the building’s original horizontally applied, rustic cedar beveled siding during rehabilitation of the building in the 1970s. The building has a east-west orientation and its primary (east) facade fronts Harrington Avenue NE. The primary facade is symmetrically divided and consists of four nearly identical sections, each comprising a single housing unit. On the first story, each section consists of a single door opening fit with a non-original paneled door, flanked by a wide tripartite picture window. Two cantilevered shed roofs extend between the sections sheltering each pair of door openings. The doors open onto poured concrete stoops connected to poured concrete sidewalks that lead to the street. On the second story, each section is punctuated by two slightly shorter, tripartite picture windows. The building’s rear elevation is similarly divided, each section containing a single door opening flanked by small metal-sliding windows on the first story, and featuring a wide tripartite picture window and a small metal-sliding window on the second story. The entire second story projects from the elevation, and the rear entrances are sheltered by cantilevered shed roofs. The building’s side elevations are clad with brick, but are otherwise unadorned. All of the building’s original windows were replaced with non-original metal windows in the 1970s. Other alterations to the building include the removal of original metal revolving clothes lines outside the rear entrance of each unit, and complete renovations of the building’s bathrooms and kitchens and ADA accessibility improvements in the early 1990s. Description of Physical Appearance: Historic Inventory Report Thursday, October 28, 2010 Page 5 of 6 Ochsner, Jeffery Karl, ed. Shaping Seattle Architecture: A Historical Guide to the Architects. Seattle, WA: University of Washington Press, 1998. Lord, Tom Forrester. Decent Housing: A Promise to Keep. Federal Housing Policy and its Impact on the City. Cambridge, MA: Schenkman Publishing Company, Inc., 1977. Madison, Charles A. Preface. In How the Other Half Lives. Jacob A. Riis. New York, NY: Dover Publications, Inc., 1971. __________. "Obituaries: George W. Stoddard." 29 September 1967:16. Seattle, WA. Rabinowitz, Alan. Urban Economics and Land Use in America: The Transformation of Cities in the Twentieth Century. Armonk, NY: M.E. Sharpe, Inc., 2004. The Seattle Times. "Seattle Firm Supported for Housing Job." 18 March 1959:44. Seattle, WA. Elenga, Maureen R. Seattle Architecture: A Walking Guide to Downtown. Seattle, WA: Seattle Architecture Foundation, 2007. Associated Press. "Tacoma Gets Housing Blues; To Renton It’s Not News." The Seattle Times. Seattle, WA, 29 June 1958. George W. Stoddard-Huggard & Associates. "Housing Authority of the City of Renton: Project Washington II-I, Renton Highlands, Renton, Washington." Construction Plans. Seattle, WA: George W. Stoddard- Huggard & Associates Architects & Engineers, 1958. On file with Renton Housing Authority, Renton, WA. Karolak, Eric J. "No Idea of Doing Anything Wonderful: The Labor-Crisis Origins of National Housing Policy and the Reconstruction of the Working-Class Community, 1917-1919." In From Tenemants to the Taylor Homes; In Search of an Urban Housing Policy in Twentieth-Century American. John F. Bauman, Roger Biles, Kristin M. Szylvian, eds. pp. 60-80. University Park, PA: Pennsylvania State University, 2000. Hanchett, Thomas W. "The Other 'Subsidized Housing': Federal Aid to Suburbanization, 1940-1960s." In From Tenements to the Taylor Homes; In Search of an Urban Housing Policy in Twentieth-Century American. John F. Bauman, Roger Biles, Kristin M. Szylvian, eds. Pp. 163-179. University Park, PA: Pennsylvania State University, 2000. Howard, Ebenezer. Garden Cities of Tomorrow. London: Swan Sonnenschein & Co., Ltd., 1902. Major Bibliographic References: Historic Inventory Report Thursday, October 28, 2010 Page 6 of 6 975 Harrington Avenue NE is in the center. West Elevation, Looking Northeast 2010 East Elevation, Looking Northwest 2010 Photos East Elevation, Looking West 2010 North and East Elevations, Looking Southwest 2010 Historic Inventory Report Thursday, October 28, 2010 Page 1 of 6 Identification Hetzel, Christopher PO Box 2316 Survey Name:Date Recorded: Field Recorder: Owner's Name:Renton Housing Authority 10/06/2010 City:Renton Classification:Building Resource Status:Comments: State:WA Zip:98056-0316 Within a District?No Contributing?No National Register: Local District: National Register District/Thematic Nomination Name: Owner Address: Survey/Inventory Not Eligible Eligibility Status: Determination Date: Determination Comments: Not Determined - SHPO 1/1/0001 Sunset Terrace Redevelopment Subarea Sunset Terrace Public Housing Complex 984 Harrington Ave NE, Renton, WA 98056 Location Field Site No.DAHP No. Historic Name: Common Name:984 Harrington Ave NE Property Address: Comments: King County T23R05E 09 Township/Range/EW Section 1/4 Sec 1/4 1/4 Sec MERCER ISLAND Quadrangle Tax No./Parcel No.7227801085 Plat/Block/Lot Acreage Supplemental Map(s) Coordinate Reference Projection: Datum: Easting: Northing: HARN (feet) Washington State Plane South 1224597 794599 Historic Inventory Report Thursday, October 28, 2010 Page 2 of 6 Description Narrative Historic Use:Domestic - Multiple Family House Current Use:Domestic - Multiple Family House Plan:Rectangle Stories:1 Structural System:Platform Frame Changes to Plan:Intact Changes to Interior:Unknown Changes to Original Cladding:Extensive Changes to Windows:Extensive Changes to Other:Not Applicable Other (specify): Style: Form/Type: Cladding: Foundation: Roof Type:Roof Material: Architecture/Landscape Architecture Study Unit Other Date of Construction: Architect:George W. Stoddard-Huggard & Associates Engineer: Property appears to meet criteria for the National Register of Historic Places:No Property is located in a potential historic district (National and/or local):No Property potentially contributes to a historic district (National and/or local):No Builder:Dahlgren Construction Company Veneer - Vinyl SidingModern Gable - Side Gable Asphalt / Composition - Shingle Concrete - Poured Multi-Family 1977 Remodel 1959 Built Date Historic Inventory Report Thursday, October 28, 2010 Page 3 of 6 The property has been evaluated according to the eligibility criteria for listing in the National Register of Historic Places (NRHP). Due to the many alterations, the integrity of the individual buildings and the complex as a whole is considered poor. The Sunset Terrace public housing complex resulted from federal investment in public housing during the postwar period and is associated with a well-known Seattle architect. However, it is a late example of its architectural type and its individual elements were substantially altered by rehabilitations in the 1970s and 1990s, such that they no longer appear to retain sufficient integrity to convey their historical significance. Based on our review, the property has poor integrity and does not appear eligible for listing in the NRHP individually or as a potential historic district. Stoddard’s design for Sunset Terrace appears to have been strongly influenced by the Garden City movement and exhibits features and characteristics of garden style apartments. All 27 buildings were arranged along curvilinear streets in locations to best take advantage of the original topography and create open, pleasing landscapes for residents. Throughout Sunset Terrace, each building is separated by open courtyard areas with outdoor space dedicated to individual housing units. At the rear of each unit, this space was originally identified by unit-specific metal revolving clotheslines. Additional design features included minimal ornamentation, aluminum windows, and varied exterior wall cladding of horizontal rustic cedar siding, vertical rough cedar channel siding, or resawn split cedar shake siding with some brick veneer. The Renton Housing Authority completed a comprehensive rehabilitation of Sunset Terrace in the 1970s, which resulted in the removal and replacement of many of these features. The original windows were replaced with new metal windows, unit doors were replaced, the revolving clotheslines were removed, and the original cedar wall claddings were replaced with vinyl siding. Subsequent changes occurred in the early 1990s when buildings in the complex were upgraded for ADA accessibility. Kitchens and bathrooms in the individual housing units were also substantially renovated at this time. The property was evaluated at a reconnaissance level in a cultural resources survey completed for the proposed Sunset Terrace Redevelopment Subarea in the City of Renton, King County, Washington. It is one of 27 buildings constructed by the Housing Authority of the City of Renton as part of the Sunset Terrace public housing complex authorized on June 28, 1958 and completed in 1959. Sunset Terrace consisted of a complex of 100 low-income housing units comprising both one- and two-story structures arranged along curvilinear streets. The complex was constructed by Seattle-based Dahlgren Construction Company according to designs by George W. Stoddard-Huggard & Associates. George W. Stoddard, a prominent Seattle architect and principal of the firm, is credited with the design of many well known public, private, and civic structures in the Seattle area, including such noted properties as the High School Memorial Stadium, the Green Lake Aqua Theater, and the Yesler Terrace Defense Housing Project. Stoddard retired in 1960, and the Sunset Terrace public housing complex is believed to have been one of his last commissions. Statement of Significance: Historic Inventory Report Thursday, October 28, 2010 Page 4 of 6 The property contains a one-story four unit apartment building constructed as part of the Sunset Terrace public housing complex in 1958-1959. Buildings in the complex were designed in one of six standard design types, each exhibiting Modern style elements. This building was constructed as a type “A” building. The building has a long rectangular plan and consists of platform frame wood construction on a poured concrete foundation. It has a very low pitch side gable roof clad with composition asphalt shingles and featuring slightly overhanging eaves with a wide fascia. The exterior walls are clad with non-original horizontally applied vinyl siding. This siding replaced the building’s original horizontally applied, resawn split cedar shake siding siding during rehabilitation of the building in the 1970s. The building has a west- east orientation and its primary (west) facade fronts Harrington Avenue NE. The primary facade is symmetrically divided and consists of four nearly identical sections, each comprising a single housing unit. Each section consists of a single door opening fit with a non-original paneled door, flanked by a wide tripartite picture window and a small metal-sliding window. The doors open onto poured concrete stoops connected to poured concrete sidewalks that lead to the street. The building’s rear elevation is similarly divided, each section containing a single door opening flanked by slightly smaller tripartite picture window and another small sliding window. The building’s side elevations are unadorned. All of the building’s original windows were replaced with non-original metal windows in the 1970s. Other alterations to the building include the removal of original metal revolving clothes lines outside the rear entrance of each unit, and complete renovations of the building’s bathrooms and kitchens and ADA accessibility improvements in the early 1990s. Description of Physical Appearance: Historic Inventory Report Thursday, October 28, 2010 Page 5 of 6 Ochsner, Jeffery Karl, ed. Shaping Seattle Architecture: A Historical Guide to the Architects. Seattle, WA: University of Washington Press, 1998. Lord, Tom Forrester. Decent Housing: A Promise to Keep. Federal Housing Policy and its Impact on the City. Cambridge, MA: Schenkman Publishing Company, Inc., 1977. Madison, Charles A. Preface. In How the Other Half Lives. Jacob A. Riis. New York, NY: Dover Publications, Inc., 1971. __________. "Obituaries: George W. Stoddard." 29 September 1967:16. Seattle, WA. Rabinowitz, Alan. Urban Economics and Land Use in America: The Transformation of Cities in the Twentieth Century. Armonk, NY: M.E. Sharpe, Inc., 2004. The Seattle Times. "Seattle Firm Supported for Housing Job." 18 March 1959:44. Seattle, WA. Elenga, Maureen R. Seattle Architecture: A Walking Guide to Downtown. Seattle, WA: Seattle Architecture Foundation, 2007. Associated Press. "Tacoma Gets Housing Blues; To Renton It’s Not News." The Seattle Times. Seattle, WA, 29 June 1958. George W. Stoddard-Huggard & Associates. "Housing Authority of the City of Renton: Project Washington II-I, Renton Highlands, Renton, Washington." Construction Plans. Seattle, WA: George W. Stoddard- Huggard & Associates Architects & Engineers, 1958. On file with Renton Housing Authority, Renton, WA. Karolak, Eric J. "No Idea of Doing Anything Wonderful: The Labor-Crisis Origins of National Housing Policy and the Reconstruction of the Working-Class Community, 1917-1919." In From Tenemants to the Taylor Homes; In Search of an Urban Housing Policy in Twentieth-Century American. John F. Bauman, Roger Biles, Kristin M. Szylvian, eds. pp. 60-80. University Park, PA: Pennsylvania State University, 2000. Hanchett, Thomas W. "The Other 'Subsidized Housing': Federal Aid to Suburbanization, 1940-1960s." In From Tenements to the Taylor Homes; In Search of an Urban Housing Policy in Twentieth-Century American. John F. Bauman, Roger Biles, Kristin M. Szylvian, eds. Pp. 163-179. University Park, PA: Pennsylvania State University, 2000. Howard, Ebenezer. Garden Cities of Tomorrow. London: Swan Sonnenschein & Co., Ltd., 1902. Major Bibliographic References: Historic Inventory Report Thursday, October 28, 2010 Page 6 of 6 2010 West Elevation, Looking East Photos East Elevation, Looking Southwest 2010 South and West Elevations, Looking Northeast 2010 Historic Inventory Report Thursday, October 28, 2010 Page 1 of 4 Identification Hetzel, Christopher Survey Name:Date Recorded: Field Recorder: Owner's Name:Salavea, Malu and Bernadette 10/06/2010 City: Classification:Building Resource Status:Comments: State:Zip: Within a District?No Contributing?No National Register: Local District: National Register District/Thematic Nomination Name: Owner Address: Survey/Inventory Not Eligible Eligibility Status: Determination Date: Determination Comments: Not Determined - SHPO 1/1/0001 Sunset Terrace Redevelopment Subarea 1067 Harrington Ave NE, Renton, WA 98056 Location Field Site No.DAHP No. Historic Name: Common Name:1067 Harrington Ave NE Property Address: Comments: King County T23R05E 09 Township/Range/EW Section 1/4 Sec 1/4 1/4 Sec MERCER ISLAND Quadrangle Tax No./Parcel No.7227801300 Plat/Block/Lot Acreage Supplemental Map(s) Coordinate Reference Projection: Datum: Easting: Northing: HARN (feet) Washington State Plane South 1224473 794744 Historic Inventory Report Thursday, October 28, 2010 Page 2 of 4 Description Narrative Historic Use:Domestic - Multiple Family House Current Use:Domestic - Multiple Family House Plan:Rectangle Stories:1 Structural System:Platform Frame Changes to Plan:Intact Changes to Interior:Unknown Changes to Original Cladding:Extensive Changes to Windows:Extensive Changes to Other:Not Applicable Other (specify): Style: Form/Type: Cladding: Foundation: Roof Type:Roof Material: Architecture/Landscape Architecture Study Unit Other Date of Construction: Architect: Engineer: Property appears to meet criteria for the National Register of Historic Places:No Property is located in a potential historic district (National and/or local):No Property potentially contributes to a historic district (National and/or local):No Builder: Wood - T 1-11 Wood - ClapboardModern - Minimal Traditional Gable - Side Gable Asphalt / Composition - Shingle Concrete - Poured Multi-Family - Duplex 1943 Built Date The property was evaluated at a reconnaissance level in a cultural resources survey completed for the proposed Sunset Terrace Redevelopment Subarea in the City of Renton, King County, Washington. It was constructed in 1943, according to the King Count tax assessor. The original owner is unknown, as are the original architect and builder. Substantial changes have been made to the building’s fenestration and wall cladding. The residence’s original windows were replaced with non-original metal sliding windows and the original clapboard and vertical board siding were replaced with non-original T1-11 siding. Because of these alterations, the residence’s integrity is considered poor. The property has been evaluated according to the eligibility criteria for listing in the National Register of Historic Places (NRHP). The reconnaissance- level survey revealed no evidence to suggest the building is historically significant due to associations with an important event or person. The building exhibits elements of the Modern style. However, it does not appear to embody characteristics or a method of construction that would warrant special recognition, and it is not located in a cohesive neighborhood or grouping. Based on our review, the property has poor integrity and does not appear eligible for listing in the NRHP individually or as a contributor to a potential historic district. Statement of Significance: Historic Inventory Report Thursday, October 28, 2010 Page 3 of 4 City of Renton, Department of Community Development. Community Profile. Renton, WA: Renton Department of Community Development, 1989. Slauson, Morda C. Renton From Coal to Jets. Renton, WA: Renton Historical Society, 2006. King County Tax Assessor Online Records. The Boeing Company, Renton Reporter, and City of Renton. Renton: The First Hundred Years, 1901-2001. Kent, WA: King County Journal Newspaper, 2001. Buerge, David M. Renton: Where the Water Took Wing. Chatsworth, CA: Windsor Publications, Inc., 1989. Major Bibliographic References: The property contains a one-story residential duplex with a rectangular plan and platform frame wood construction on a poured concrete foundation. The residence has a north-south orientation and fronts Glennwood Avenue NE on the east. The duplex was originally designed with elements of the Minimal Traditional style. It has a medium pitch side-gable roof with composition asphalt shingles and slightly overhanging eaves at the front and rear elevations. Two brick chimneys extend from the roof ridgeline. The exterior walls are clad with non-original T1-11 wood siding with horizontal clapboard in the gable ends. The primary facade is nearly symmetrically divided and four bays wide. Each bay is characterized by a single window opening. The northernmost bay contains a non-original vinyl tripartite window, while the other windows consists of non-original vinyl sliding windows. One housing unit entrance is located at the facade’s southernmost bay. It is accessed by a non-original, raised wood porch. The entrance to the other housing unit entrance punctuates the building’s north elevation. It is characterized by a small entry porch with a raised wood floor, sheltered by a projecting shed roof supported by wood columns. The fenestration consists of non-original vinyl sliding windows throughout the residence. Description of Physical Appearance: Historic Inventory Report Thursday, October 28, 2010 Page 4 of 4 South and West Elevations, Looking Northeast 2010 East Elevation, Looking West 2010 Photos South and East Elevations, Looking Northwest 2010 East Elevation, Looking Southwest 2010 Historic Inventory Report Thursday, October 28, 2010 Page 1 of 4 Identification Hetzel, Christopher Survey Name:Date Recorded: Field Recorder: Owner's Name:Cole, Letty 10/06/2010 City: Classification:Building Resource Status:Comments: State:Zip: Within a District?No Contributing?No National Register: Local District: National Register District/Thematic Nomination Name: Owner Address: Survey/Inventory Not Eligible Eligibility Status: Determination Date: Determination Comments: Not Determined - SHPO 1/1/0001 Sunset Terrace Redevelopment Subarea 1073 Harrington Ave NE, Renton, WA 98056 Location Field Site No.DAHP No. Historic Name: Common Name:1073 Harrington Ave NE Property Address: Comments: King County T23R05E 09 Township/Range/EW Section 1/4 Sec 1/4 1/4 Sec MERCER ISLAND Quadrangle Tax No./Parcel No.7227801295 Plat/Block/Lot Acreage Supplemental Map(s) Coordinate Reference Projection: Datum: Easting: Northing: HARN (feet) Washington State Plane South 1224473 794854 Historic Inventory Report Thursday, October 28, 2010 Page 2 of 4 Description Narrative Historic Use:Domestic - Multiple Family House Current Use:Domestic - Multiple Family House Plan:Rectangle Stories:1 Structural System:Platform Frame Changes to Plan:Intact Changes to Interior:Unknown Changes to Original Cladding:Extensive Changes to Windows:Slight Changes to Other:Not Applicable Other (specify): Style: Form/Type: Cladding: Foundation: Roof Type:Roof Material: Architecture/Landscape Architecture Study Unit Other Date of Construction: Architect: Engineer: Property appears to meet criteria for the National Register of Historic Places:No Property is located in a potential historic district (National and/or local):No Property potentially contributes to a historic district (National and/or local):No Builder: Shingle - Coursed Wood - ClapboardModern - Minimal Traditional Gable - Side Gable Asphalt / Composition - Shingle Unknown Multi-Family - Duplex 1943 Built Date The property was evaluated at a reconnaissance level in a cultural resources survey completed for the proposed Sunset Terrace Redevelopment Subarea in the City of Renton, King County, Washington. It was constructed in 1943, according to the King Count tax assessor. The original owner is unknown, as are the original architect and builder. Changes have been made to the building’s wall cladding. The residence’s original clapboard and vertical board siding was replaced with non-original coursed wood shingles. Because of this alteration, the residence’s integrity is considered fair. The property has been evaluated according to the eligibility criteria for listing in the National Register of Historic Places (NRHP). The reconnaissance-level survey revealed no evidence to suggest the building is historically significant due to associations with an important event or person. The building exhibits elements of the Minimal Traditional style. However, it does not appear to embody characteristics or a method of construction that would warrant special recognition, and it is not located in a cohesive neighborhood or grouping. Based on our review, the property has fair integrity and does not appear eligible for listing in the NRHP individually or as a contributor to a potential historic district. Statement of Significance: Historic Inventory Report Thursday, October 28, 2010 Page 3 of 4 City of Renton, Department of Community Development. "Community Profile." Renton, WA: Renton Department of Community Development, 1989. Slauson, Morda C. Renton From Coal to Jets. Renton, WA: Renton Historical Society, 2006. King County Tax Assessor Online Records. The Boeing Company, Renton Reporter, and City of Renton. Renton: The First Hundred Years, 1901-2001. Kent, WA: King County Journal Newspaper, 2001. Buerge, David M. Renton: Where the Water Took Wing. Chatsworth, CA: Windsor Publications, Inc., 1989. Major Bibliographic References: The property contains a one-story residential duplex with a rectangular plan and platform frame wood construction on a poured concrete foundation. The residence has a north-south orientation and fronts Harrington Avenue NE on the east. The duplex was originally designed with elements of the Minimal Traditional style. It has a medium pitch side-gable roof with composition asphalt shingles and slightly overhanging eaves at the front and rear elevations. The exterior walls are clad with non-original coursed wood shingle siding with horizontal clapboard in the gable ends. Portions of the exposed foundation are clad with a cultured stone veneer. The primary facade is nearly symmetrically divided and seven bays wide. The three center bays each contain a pair of original, one-over-one, double-hung wood sash windows in wood frames. The outer bays each contain an single door opening flanked by other pairs of original double-hung wood sash windows. The doors, which are the entrances to each housing unit, are accessed by poured concrete stoops with metal railings. A one-story addition is present at the southern portion of the residence’s rear elevation. Description of Physical Appearance: Historic Inventory Report Thursday, October 28, 2010 Page 4 of 4 2010 East and North Elevations, Looking Southwest Photos South and East Elevations, Looking Northwest 2010 South and East Elevations, Looking Northwest 2010 Historic Inventory Report Thursday, October 28, 2010 Page 1 of 4 Identification Hetzel, Christopher Survey Name:Date Recorded: Field Recorder: Owner's Name:Dalpay, James W., Jr. and Jullie A. 10/06/2010 City: Classification:Building Resource Status:Comments: State:Zip: Within a District?No Contributing?No National Register: Local District: National Register District/Thematic Nomination Name: Owner Address: Survey/Inventory Not Eligible Eligibility Status: Determination Date: Determination Comments: Not Determined - SHPO 1/1/0001 Sunset Terrace Redevelopment Subarea 1409 Monroe NE, Renton, WA 98056 Location Field Site No.DAHP No. Historic Name: Common Name:1409 Monroe Ave NE Property Address: Comments: King CountyTownship/Range/EW Section 1/4 Sec 1/4 1/4 Sec MERCER ISLAND Quadrangle Tax No./Parcel No.423059104 Plat/Block/Lot Acreage Supplemental Map(s) Coordinate Reference Projection: Datum: Easting: Northing: HARN (feet) Washington State Plane South 1226469 796335 Historic Inventory Report Thursday, October 28, 2010 Page 2 of 4 Description Narrative Historic Use:Domestic - Single Family House Current Use:Domestic - Single Family House Plan:Rectangle Stories:1 Structural System:Platform Frame Changes to Plan:Intact Changes to Interior:Unknown Changes to Original Cladding:Intact Changes to Windows:Extensive Changes to Other:Not Applicable Other (specify): Style: Form/Type: Cladding: Foundation: Roof Type:Roof Material: Architecture/Landscape Architecture Study Unit Other Date of Construction: Architect: Engineer: Property appears to meet criteria for the National Register of Historic Places:No Property is located in a potential historic district (National and/or local):No Property potentially contributes to a historic district (National and/or local):No Builder: Wood - ClapboardModern - Minimal Traditional Hip Asphalt / Composition - Shingle Concrete - Block Single Family 1942 Built Date The property was evaluated at a reconnaissance level in a cultural resources survey completed for the proposed Sunset Terrace Redevelopment Subarea in the City of Renton, King County, Washington. It was constructed in 1942, according to the King Count tax assessor. The original owner is unknown, as are the original architect and builder. Changes have been made to the building’s fenestration. The residence’s original wood windows were replaced with non-original vinyl windows. Because of this alteration, the residence’s integrity is considered fair. The property has been evaluated according to the eligibility criteria for listing in the National Register of Historic Places (NRHP). The reconnaissance-level survey revealed no evidence to suggest the building is historically significant due to associations with an important event or person. The residence exhibits the Minimal Traditional style. However, it does not appear to embody characteristics or a method of construction that would warrant special recognition, and it is not located in a cohesive neighborhood or grouping. Based on our review, the property has fair integrity and does not appear eligible for listing in the NRHP individually or as a contributor to a potential historic district. Statement of Significance: Historic Inventory Report Thursday, October 28, 2010 Page 3 of 4 City of Renton, Department of Community Development. "Community Profile." Renton, WA: Renton Department of Community Development, 1989. Slauson, Morda C. Renton From Coal to Jets. Renton, WA: Renton Historical Society, 2006. King County Tax Assessor Online Records. The Boeing Company, Renton Reporter, and City of Renton. Renton: The First Hundred Years, 1901-2001. Kent, WA: King County Journal Newspaper, 2001. Buerge, David M. Renton: Where the Water Took Wing. Chatsworth, CA: Windsor Publications, Inc., 1989. Major Bibliographic References: The property contains a one-story single-family residence with a rectangular plan and platform frame wood construction on a concrete block foundation. It has an east-west orientation and faces east towards Monroe Avenue NE. The residence was originally designed in the Minimal Traditional style. It has a medium pitch hip roof with composition asphalt shingles and no overhanging eaves. The exterior walls are clad with original wood clapboard siding. The primary (east) facade is asymmetrically divided and four bays wide. The residence’s front door opening is located in one of the center bays, accessed by a raised poured concrete stoop. It is sheltered by a projecting, front-gable hood and features a wood door and metal storm door. The facade’s southernmost bay contains a large window opening fit with a non-original vinyl picture window with lower sliding sashes. The facade’s two northernmost bays are punctuated by single window openings, each characterized by original faux wood shutters. Similar windows are located on the side and rear elevations. The fenestration consists of non-original vinyl windows throughout the residence. A one-story attached automobile garage projects southward from the residence’s southwest corner. It has a garage door opening in the east elevation, fit with an original overhead garage door. The garage is accessed from the street by a paved driveway along the residence’s south elevation. Description of Physical Appearance: Historic Inventory Report Thursday, October 28, 2010 Page 4 of 4 2010 East and North Elevations, Looking Southwest Photos 2010 East Elevation, Looking West Historic Inventory Report Thursday, October 28, 2010 Page 1 of 4 Identification Hetzel, Christopher Survey Name:Date Recorded: Field Recorder: Owner's Name: 10/06/2010 City: Classification:Building Resource Status:Comments: State:Zip: Within a District?No Contributing?No National Register: Local District: National Register District/Thematic Nomination Name: Owner Address: Survey/Inventory Not Eligible Eligibility Status: Determination Date: Determination Comments: Not Determined - SHPO 1/1/0001 Sunset Terrace Redevelopment Subarea 1417 Monroe Ave NE, Renton, WA 98056 Location Field Site No.DAHP No. Historic Name: Common Name:1417 Monroe Ave NE Property Address: Comments: King County T23R05E 04 Township/Range/EW Section 1/4 Sec 1/4 1/4 Sec MERCER ISLAND Quadrangle Tax No./Parcel No.423059104 Plat/Block/Lot Acreage Supplemental Map(s) Coordinate Reference Projection: Datum: Easting: Northing: HARN (feet) Washington State Plane South 1226444 796408 Historic Inventory Report Thursday, October 28, 2010 Page 2 of 4 Description Narrative Historic Use:Domestic - Single Family House Current Use:Domestic - Single Family House Plan:Rectangle Stories:1 Structural System:Platform Frame Changes to Plan:Intact Changes to Interior:Unknown Changes to Original Cladding:Extensive Changes to Windows:Extensive Changes to Other:Extensive Other (specify):Porch Style: Form/Type: Cladding: Foundation: Roof Type:Roof Material: Architecture/Landscape Architecture Study Unit Other Date of Construction: Architect: Engineer: Property appears to meet criteria for the National Register of Historic Places:No Property is located in a potential historic district (National and/or local):No Property potentially contributes to a historic district (National and/or local):No Builder: Shingle - CoursedColonial - Colonial Revival Gable - Clipped Gable/Jerkinhead Asphalt / Composition - Shingle Concrete - Poured Single Family 1935 Built Date The property was evaluated at a reconnaissance level in a cultural resources survey completed for the proposed Sunset Terrace Redevelopment Subarea in the City of Renton, King County, Washington. It was constructed in 1935, according to the King Count tax assessor. The original owner is unknown, as are the original architect and builder. Changes have been made to the building’s fenestration, porch, and wall cladding. The residence’s original wood windows were replaced with non-original vinyl windows, the porch enclosed, and the original wall cladding replaced with non-original coursed wood shingles. Because of these alterations, the residence’s integrity is considered poor. The property has been evaluated according to the eligibility criteria for listing in the National Register of Historic Places (NRHP). The reconnaissance-level survey revealed no evidence to suggest the residence is historically significant due to associations with an important event or person. The residence exhibits elements of the Colonial Revival style. However, it no longer retains sufficient integrity to convey significance, does not otherwise appear to embody characteristics or a method of construction that would warrant special recognition, and it is not located in a cohesive neighborhood or grouping. Based on our review, the property has poor integrity and does not appear eligible for listing in the NRHP individually or as a contributor to a potential historic district. Statement of Significance: Historic Inventory Report Thursday, October 28, 2010 Page 3 of 4 City of Renton, Department of Community Development. "Community Profile." Renton, WA: Renton Department of Community Development, 1989. Slauson, Morda C. Renton From Coal to Jets. Renton, WA: Renton Historical Society, 2006. King County Tax Assessor Online Records. The Boeing Company, Renton Reporter, and City of Renton. Renton: The First Hundred Years, 1901-2001. Kent, WA: King County Journal Newspaper, 2001. Buerge, David M. Renton: Where the Water Took Wing. Chatsworth, CA: Windsor Publications, Inc., 1989. Major Bibliographic References: The property contains a one-story single-family residence with a rectangular plan and platform frame wood construction. It has a northeast-southwest orientation and faces east at an angle toward Monroe Avenue, behind a deep setback. The residence was originally designed with Colonial Revival style elements. It has a steeply pitched hip-on-side gable roof with composition asphalt shingles and no overhanging eaves. The exterior walls are clad with non-original coursed wood shingles. The primary facade is asymmetrically divided and three bays wide. The facade’s easternmost bay is characterized by an enclosed, projecting front porch. The porch has a shed roof and contains the residence’s front door opening, which is flanked by full-height sidelight windows. A small window punctuates the facades center bay and a pair of windows are located in the residence’s northeast elevation. The fenestration consists of non-original vinyl windows set in original wood frames windows throughout the residence. A large wood decks characterizes the residence’s rear elevation. Description of Physical Appearance: Historic Inventory Report Thursday, October 28, 2010 Page 4 of 4 2010 East and North Elevations, Looking Southwest Photos 2010 East and North Elevations, Looking West Historic Inventory Report Thursday, October 28, 2010 Page 1 of 4 Identification Hetzel, Christopher Survey Name:Date Recorded: Field Recorder: Owner's Name: 10/06/2010 City: Classification:Building Resource Status:Comments: State:Zip: Within a District?No Contributing?No National Register: Local District: National Register District/Thematic Nomination Name: Owner Address: Survey/Inventory Not Eligible Eligibility Status: Determination Date: Determination Comments: Not Determined - SHPO 1/1/0001 Sunset Terrace Redevelopment Subarea 2502 NE Sunset Blvd , Renton, WA 98056 Location Field Site No.DAHP No. Historic Name: Common Name:2502 NE Sunset Blvd Property Address: Comments: King County T23R05E 09 Township/Range/EW Section 1/4 Sec 1/4 1/4 Sec MERCER ISLAND Quadrangle Tax No./Parcel No.923059058 Plat/Block/Lot Acreage Supplemental Map(s) Coordinate Reference Projection: Datum: Easting: Northing: HARN (feet) Washington State Plane South 1224007 794825 Historic Inventory Report Thursday, October 28, 2010 Page 2 of 4 Description Narrative Historic Use:Domestic - Single Family House Current Use:Domestic - Single Family House Plan:Irregular Stories:1 Structural System:Platform Frame Changes to Plan:Extensive Changes to Interior:Unknown Changes to Original Cladding:Extensive Changes to Windows:Extensive Changes to Other:Not Applicable Other (specify): Style: Form/Type: Cladding: Foundation: Roof Type:Roof Material: Architecture/Landscape Architecture Study Unit Other Date of Construction: Architect: Engineer: Property appears to meet criteria for the National Register of Historic Places:No Property is located in a potential historic district (National and/or local):No Property potentially contributes to a historic district (National and/or local):No Builder: Shingle - Concrete/Asbestos Colonial - Colonial Revival Gable - Cross Gable Asphalt / Composition - Shingle Concrete - Poured Single Family 1943 Built Date The property was evaluated at a reconnaissance level in a cultural resources survey completed for the proposed Sunset Terrace Redevelopment Subarea in the City of Renton, King County, Washington. It was constructed in 1943, according to the King Count tax assessor. The original owner is unknown, as are the original architect and builder. Changes have been made to the building’s fenestration and wall cladding, and multiple additions have been constructed. The residence’s original wood windows were replaced with non-original metal windows and the original wall cladding replaced with non-original asbestos shingle siding. Because of these alterations, the residence’s integrity is considered poor. The property has been evaluated according to the eligibility criteria for listing in the National Register of Historic Places (NRHP). The reconnaissance-level survey revealed no evidence to suggest the residence is historically significant due to associations with an important event or person. The residence exhibits elements of the Colonial Revival style. However, it no longer retains sufficient integrity to convey significance, does not otherwise appear to embody characteristics or a method of construction that would warrant special recognition, and it is not located in a cohesive neighborhood or grouping. Based on our review, the property has poor integrity and does not appear eligible for listing in the NRHP individually or as a contributor to a potential historic district. Statement of Significance: Historic Inventory Report Thursday, October 28, 2010 Page 3 of 4 City of Renton, Department of Community Development. "Community Profile." Renton, WA: Renton Department of Community Development, 1989. Slauson, Morda C. Renton From Coal to Jets. Renton, WA: Renton Historical Society, 2006. King County Tax Assessor Online Records. The Boeing Company, Renton Reporter, and City of Renton. Renton: The First Hundred Years, 1901-2001. Kent, WA: King County Journal Newspaper, 2001. Buerge, David M. Renton: Where the Water Took Wing. Chatsworth, CA: Windsor Publications, Inc., 1989. Major Bibliographic References: The property contains a one-story single-family residence with an irregular plan and platform frame wood construction. The residence faces southwest on a large parcel with a deep setback from Sunset Boulevard, facing southwest over a slight hill. It was originally designed with elements of the Colonial Revival style. It has a medium pitch cross gable roof with composition asphalt shingles and slightly overhanging eaves. The exterior walls are clad with non-original asbestos shingle siding. The primary (southwest) facade is asymmetrically divided and five bays wide. The facade’s two westernmost bays comprise a one-story addition on the northwest elevation. A projecting front porch characterizes the center of the facade’s three easternmost bays. It features a front gable roof and shelters the residence’s front entrance. The porch is flanked by tall window openings, each fit with non-original fixed metal windows with casement transom lights. Similar windows punctuate the side and rear elevations. The fenestration consists of non- original metal windows throughout the residence, some with altered openings. Another one-story addition was constructed on the rear elevation and a one-story, detached automobile garage stands behind the residence. The garage has a gable roof and a garage door opening on the southeast elevation with an overhead garage door. Description of Physical Appearance: Historic Inventory Report Thursday, October 28, 2010 Page 4 of 4 2010 South and East Elevations, Looking North Photos 2010 South and East Elevations, Looking Northwest Historic Inventory Report Thursday, October 28, 2010 Page 1 of 4 Identification Hetzel, Christopher Survey Name:Date Recorded: Field Recorder: Owner's Name:Ruffalo, Sam and Hazel 10/06/2010 City: Classification:Building Resource Status:Comments: State:Zip: Within a District?No Contributing?No National Register: Local District: National Register District/Thematic Nomination Name: Owner Address: Survey/Inventory Not Eligible Eligibility Status: Determination Date: Determination Comments: Not Determined - SHPO 1/1/0001 Sunset Terrace Redevelopment Subarea 2615 NE Sunset Blvd , Renton, WA 98056 Location Field Site No.DAHP No. Historic Name: Common Name:Apex Auto Repair Property Address: Comments: King County T23R05E 09 Township/Range/EW Section 1/4 Sec 1/4 1/4 Sec RENTON Quadrangle Tax No./Parcel No.7227500550 Plat/Block/Lot Acreage Supplemental Map(s) Coordinate Reference Projection: Datum: Easting: Northing: HARN (feet) Washington State Plane South 1224416 794079 Historic Inventory Report Thursday, October 28, 2010 Page 2 of 4 Description Narrative Historic Use:Transportation - Road-Related (vehicular)Current Use:Transportation - Road-Related (vehicular) Plan:Rectangle Stories:1 Structural System:Unreinforced Masonry Changes to Plan:Intact Changes to Interior:Unknown Changes to Original Cladding:Slight Changes to Windows:Slight Changes to Other:Not Applicable Other (specify): Style: Form/Type: Cladding: Foundation: Roof Type:Roof Material: Architecture/Landscape Architecture Study Unit Other Date of Construction: Architect: Engineer: Property appears to meet criteria for the National Register of Historic Places:No Property is located in a potential historic district (National and/or local):No Property potentially contributes to a historic district (National and/or local):No Builder: Veneer - StuccoModern Flat with Parapet Unknown Concrete - Poured Commercial 1958 Built Date The property was evaluated at a reconnaissance level in a cultural resources survey completed for the proposed Sunset Terrace Redevelopment Subarea in the City of Renton, King County, Washington. It was constructed in 1958, according to the King Count tax assessor. It was originally constructed as an automobile service station and retains this use. It is currently occupied by Apex Auto Repair. The original owner is unknown, as are the original architect and builder. The building has experienced only minor changes and its original integrity appears to be essentially intact. The property has been evaluated according to the eligibility criteria for listing in the National Register of Historic Places (NRHP). The reconnaissance-level survey revealed no evidence to suggest the building is historically significant due to associations with an important event or person. The building is representative of an automobile service station from the late 1950s in a Modern style. However, it does not appear to embody characteristics or a method of construction that would warrant special recognition, and it is not located in a cohesive neighborhood or grouping. Based on our review, the property has good integrity, but does not appear eligible for listing in the NRHP individually or as a contributor to a potential historic district. Statement of Significance: Historic Inventory Report Thursday, October 28, 2010 Page 3 of 4 City of Renton, Department of Community Development. "Community Profile." Renton, WA: Renton Department of Community Development, 1989. Slauson, Morda C. Renton From Coal to Jets. Renton, WA: Renton Historical Society, 2006. King County Tax Assessor Online Records. The Boeing Company, Renton Reporter, and City of Renton. Renton: The First Hundred Years, 1901-2001. Kent, WA: King County Journal Newspaper, 2001. Buerge, David M. Renton: Where the Water Took Wing. Chatsworth, CA: Windsor Publications, Inc., 1989. Major Bibliographic References: The property contains a one-story automotive service station. It has a north-south orientation and is surrounded by a paved parking area on all sides. The building has an rectangular plan and consists of a masonry construction. It a flat roof with a metal capped parapet above a projecting cornice that extends along the front and side elevations. The exterior walls are clad with textured stucco. The primary (north) facade is asymmetrical divided and three bays wide. The two easternmost bays each contain large vehicle bay doors, which open to an interior auto repair garage. The doors are fit with roll-up garage doors. The facade’s eastern bay consists of an original wood-frame storefront. The storefront has a single-light wood door below a fixed transom light in the center, flanked by two large, plate glass windows with single-light transoms. The plate glass windows set on low knee walls. Two similar windows punctuate the building’s east elevation, along with another door opening. The storefront windows and doors define the building’s office space. A large multiple-light industrial window characterizes the building’s west elevation. Description of Physical Appearance: Historic Inventory Report Thursday, October 28, 2010 Page 4 of 4 2010 North and East Elevations, Looking West Photos 2010 North and East Elevations, Looking Southwest Historic Inventory Report Thursday, October 28, 2010 Page 1 of 4 Identification Hetzel, Christopher Survey Name:Date Recorded: Field Recorder: Owner's Name:Ruffalo, Sam and Hazel 10/06/2010 City: Classification:Building Resource Status:Comments: State:Zip: Within a District?No Contributing?No National Register: Local District: National Register District/Thematic Nomination Name: Owner Address: Survey/Inventory Not Eligible Eligibility Status: Determination Date: Determination Comments: Not Determined - SHPO 1/1/0001 Sunset Terrace Redevelopment Subarea 2621 NE Sunset Blvd , Renton, WA 98056 Location Field Site No.DAHP No. Historic Name: Common Name:Katie J's Bar & Grill Property Address: Comments: King County T23R05E 09 Township/Range/EW Section 1/4 Sec 1/4 1/4 Sec RENTON Quadrangle Tax No./Parcel No.7227500550 Plat/Block/Lot Acreage Supplemental Map(s) Coordinate Reference Projection: Datum: Easting: Northing: HARN (feet) Washington State Plane South 1224537 794040 Historic Inventory Report Thursday, October 28, 2010 Page 2 of 4 Description Narrative Historic Use:Commerce/Trade - Restaurant Current Use:Commerce/Trade - Restaurant Plan:Rectangle Stories:1 Structural System:Platform Frame Changes to Plan:Slight Changes to Interior:Unknown Changes to Original Cladding:Intact Changes to Windows:Extensive Changes to Other:Not Applicable Other (specify): Style: Form/Type: Cladding: Foundation: Roof Type:Roof Material: Architecture/Landscape Architecture Study Unit Other Date of Construction: Architect: Engineer: Property appears to meet criteria for the National Register of Historic Places:No Property is located in a potential historic district (National and/or local):No Property potentially contributes to a historic district (National and/or local):No Builder: Veneer - Permastone Veneer - Stucco Concrete - BlockModern Flat with Eaves Asphalt / Composition Concrete - Poured Commercial 1959 Built Date The property was evaluated at a reconnaissance level in a cultural resources survey completed for the proposed Sunset Terrace Redevelopment Subarea in the City of Renton, King County, Washington. It was constructed in 1959, according to the King Count tax assessor. It appears to have been originally constructed as a commercial restaurant and retains this use. It is currently occupied by Katie J’s Bar & Grill. The original owner is unknown, as are the original architect and builder. Substantial changes have been made to the building’s fenestration, including the partial enclosure and replacement of its original windows. Because of these alterations, the building’s integrity is considered poor. The property has been evaluated according to the eligibility criteria for listing in the National Register of Historic Places (NRHP). The reconnaissance-level survey revealed no evidence to suggest the building is historically significant due to associations with an important event or person. The building is representative of an late 1950s restaurant building. However, it does not appear to embody characteristics or a method of construction that would warrant special recognition, and it is not located in a cohesive neighborhood or grouping. Based on our review, the property has poor integrity and does not appear eligible for listing in the NRHP individually or as a contributor to a potential historic district. Statement of Significance: Historic Inventory Report Thursday, October 28, 2010 Page 3 of 4 City of Renton, Department of Community Development. "Community Profile." Renton, WA: Renton Department of Community Development, 1989. Slauson, Morda C. Renton From Coal to Jets. Renton, WA: Renton Historical Society, 2006. King County Tax Assessor Online Records. The Boeing Company, Renton Reporter, and City of Renton. Renton: The First Hundred Years, 1901-2001. Kent, WA: King County Journal Newspaper, 2001. Buerge, David M. Renton: Where the Water Took Wing. Chatsworth, CA: Windsor Publications, Inc., 1989. Major Bibliographic References: The property contains a one-story commercial building that functions as a restaurant. The building has a west-east orientation and is surrounded by a large paved parking area. It sets back from NE Sunset Boulevard, which is to the north. The building has a rectangular plan and consists of concrete block construction. It has a nearly flat shed roof that angles from the front to the back and is clad with composition roofing. The roof has wide overhanging eaves at the primary (west) facade with exposed wood structural beams in the eaves. The exterior walls consist of a cultured stone veneer cladding at the front elevation and painted concrete block at the side and rear elevations. The primary facade is asymmetrically divided and eight bays wide. It is characterized by a series of large window openings, which have been partially enclosed by stuccoed panels at the top and have stone sills. The openings’ lower portions are fit with wide, non-original, fixed, metal-frame windows. Three of the windows are single-light picture windows, while the others contain multiple sashes. Two pedestrian doors punctuate the facade as well. They open to a concrete sidewalk that extends the length of the elevation. An outdoor patio area has been constructed at the building’s north elevation, and a metal frame roof sign stands atop the roof adjacent to various heating and cooling equipment. The buildings side and rear elevations are unadorned. Description of Physical Appearance: Historic Inventory Report Thursday, October 28, 2010 Page 4 of 4 2010 East and North Elevations, Looking Southwest Photos East Elevation, Looking West 2010 West Elevation, Looking Southeast 2010 Historic Inventory Report Thursday, October 28, 2010 Page 1 of 4 Identification Hetzel, Christopher Survey Name:Date Recorded: Field Recorder: Owner's Name:Safeway Inc., Store 0366 10/06/2010 City: Classification:Building Resource Status:Comments: State:Zip: Within a District?No Contributing?No National Register: Local District: National Register District/Thematic Nomination Name: Owner Address: Survey/Inventory Not Eligible Eligibility Status: Determination Date: Determination Comments: Not Determined - SHPO 1/1/0001 Sunset Terrace Redevelopment Subarea 2725 NE Sunset Blvd , Renton, WA 98056 Location Field Site No.DAHP No. Historic Name: Common Name:Safeway Property Address: Comments: King County T23R05E 09 Township/Range/EW Section 1/4 Sec 1/4 1/4 Sec RENTON Quadrangle Tax No./Parcel No.7227801026 Plat/Block/Lot Acreage Supplemental Map(s) Coordinate Reference Projection: Datum: Easting: Northing: HARN (feet) Washington State Plane South 1225103 794231 Historic Inventory Report Thursday, October 28, 2010 Page 2 of 4 Description Narrative Historic Use:Commerce/Trade - Business Current Use:Commerce/Trade - Business Plan:Rectangle Stories:1 Structural System:Unreinforced Masonry Changes to Plan:Intact Changes to Interior:Unknown Changes to Original Cladding:Moderate Changes to Windows:Extensive Changes to Other:Extensive Other (specify):Facade Style: Form/Type: Cladding: Foundation: Roof Type:Roof Material: Architecture/Landscape Architecture Study Unit Other Date of Construction: Architect: Engineer: Property appears to meet criteria for the National Register of Historic Places:No Property is located in a potential historic district (National and/or local):No Property potentially contributes to a historic district (National and/or local):No Builder: Veneer - Permastone Veneer - Stucco Concrete - BlockModern Flat with Parapet Unknown Concrete - Poured Commercial 1959 Built Date The property was evaluated at a reconnaissance level in a cultural resources survey completed for the proposed Sunset Terrace Redevelopment Subarea in the City of Renton, King County, Washington. It was constructed in 1964, according to the King Count tax assessor. It appears to have been originally constructed as a commercial supermarket and continues to retain this use. It is currently occupied by a Safeway supermarket. The original owner is unknown, as are the original architect and builder. Substantial changes have been made to the building’s facade, including its wall cladding and fenestration. Because of these alterations, the building’s integrity is considered poor. The property has been evaluated according to the eligibility criteria for listing in the National Register of Historic Places (NRHP). The reconnaissance-level survey revealed no evidence to suggest the building is historically significant due to associations with an important event or person. The building is representative of a 1960s supermarket building. However, it has lost integrity and does not otherwise appear to embody characteristics or a method of construction that would warrant special recognition, and it is not located in a cohesive neighborhood or grouping. Based on our review, the property has poor integrity and does not appear eligible for listing in the NRHP individually or as a contributor to a potential historic district. Statement of Significance: Historic Inventory Report Thursday, October 28, 2010 Page 3 of 4 City of Renton, Department of Community Development. "Community Profile." Renton, WA: Renton Department of Community Development, 1989. Slauson, Morda C. Renton From Coal to Jets. Renton, WA: Renton Historical Society, 2006. King County Tax Assessor Online Records. The Boeing Company, Renton Reporter, and City of Renton. Renton: The First Hundred Years, 1901-2001. Kent, WA: King County Journal Newspaper, 2001. Buerge, David M. Renton: Where the Water Took Wing. Chatsworth, CA: Windsor Publications, Inc., 1989. Major Bibliographic References: The property contains a one-story commercial supermarket building on a large parcel, setback at an angle from NE Sunset Boulevard. The building has a west-east orientation and is surrounded on the west, north, and south by a paved parking lot. It has a rectangular plan and a combination of platform frame and masonry construction. The building was originally designed in the elements of the Modern style, but has been substantially altered with subsequent rehabilitation. It has a flat roof with a tall parapet at the front elevation. The exterior walls are clad with a combination of stucco and a cultured stone veneer along the building’s primary (west) facade. The side and rear elevations are finished with painted concrete block. painted brick. The primary facade is asymmetrically divided and is characterized by a wide bank of non- original, metal-frame, plate glass ribbon windows. The windows are flanked by storefront entrances on either side and are adorned with fixed metal awnings. The northernmost entrance is characterized by a projecting tower feature, which shelters the entry. The tower has a molded cornice, which extends along the elevation’s parapet and decorative, lattice architectural elements hanging from its north and south elevations. A loading dock and truck ramp extend the length of the building’s north elevation. Description of Physical Appearance: Historic Inventory Report Thursday, October 28, 2010 Page 4 of 4 North and West Elevations, Looking Southeast 2010 West Elevation, Looking Northeast 2010 Photos West and South Elevations, Looking Northeast 2010 West Elevation, Looking East 2010 Historic Inventory Report Thursday, October 28, 2010 Page 1 of 5 Identification Hetzel, Christopher Survey Name:Date Recorded: Field Recorder: Owner's Name:Yadav & Gill LLC 10/06/2010 City: Classification:Building Resource Status:Comments: State:Zip: Within a District?No Contributing?No National Register: Local District: National Register District/Thematic Nomination Name: Owner Address: Survey/Inventory Not Eligible Eligibility Status: Determination Date: Determination Comments: Not Determined - SHPO 1/1/0001 Sunset Terrace Redevelopment Subarea 2800 NE Sunset Blvd , Renton, WA 98056 Location Field Site No.DAHP No. Historic Name: Common Name:2800 NE Sunset Blvd Property Address: Comments: King County T23R05E 09 Township/Range/EW Section 1/4 Sec 1/4 1/4 Sec MERCER ISLAND Quadrangle Tax No./Parcel No.7227801201 Plat/Block/Lot Acreage Supplemental Map(s) Coordinate Reference Projection: Datum: Easting: Northing: HARN (feet) Washington State Plane South 1224944 794689 Historic Inventory Report Thursday, October 28, 2010 Page 2 of 5 Description Narrative Historic Use:Transportation - Road-Related (vehicular)Current Use:Transportation - Road-Related (vehicular) Plan:Rectangle Stories:1 Structural System:Platform Frame Changes to Plan:Intact Changes to Interior:Unknown Changes to Original Cladding:Slight Changes to Windows:Extensive Changes to Other:Extensive Other (specify):Storefronts and Style: Form/Type: Cladding: Foundation: Roof Type:Roof Material: Architecture/Landscape Architecture Study Unit Other Date of Construction: Architect: Engineer: Property appears to meet criteria for the National Register of Historic Places:No Property is located in a potential historic district (National and/or local):No Property potentially contributes to a historic district (National and/or local):No Builder: Concrete - Poured Concrete - Block BrickModern Gable Mansard Concrete - Tile Concrete - Poured Commercial 1959 Built Date The property was evaluated at a reconnaissance level in a cultural resources survey completed for the proposed Sunset Terrace Redevelopment Subarea in the City of Renton, King County, Washington. It was constructed in 1959, according to the King Count tax assessor. It was originally constructed as an automobile service station, but was substantially altered when it was converted for use as a gas station and convenience store. It is currently occupied by Shell Oil. The original owner is unknown, as are the original architect and builder. Substantial changes have been made to the building’s facade and interior spaces, including the removal, replacement, and reconfiguration of its door and window openings and the removal of its auto service bays. Because of these alterations, the building’s integrity is considered poor. The property has been evaluated according to the eligibility criteria for listing in the National Register of Historic Places (NRHP). The reconnaissance-level survey revealed no evidence to suggest the building is historically significant due to associations with an important event or person. The building is representative of an automobile service station from the late 1950s in a Modern style. However, it has lost integrity and does not appear to otherwise embody characteristics or a method of construction that would warrant special recognition, and it is not located in a cohesive neighborhood or grouping. Based on our review, the property has poor integrity and does not appear eligible for listing in the NRHP individually or as a contributor to a potential historic district. Statement of Significance: Historic Inventory Report Thursday, October 28, 2010 Page 3 of 5 City of Renton, Department of Community Development. "Community Profile." Renton, WA: Renton Department of Community Development, 1989. Slauson, Morda C. Renton From Coal to Jets. Renton, WA: Renton Historical Society, 2006. King County Tax Assessor Online Records. The Boeing Company, Renton Reporter, and City of Renton. Renton: The First Hundred Years, 1901-2001. Kent, WA: King County Journal Newspaper, 2001. Buerge, David M. Renton: Where the Water Took Wing. Chatsworth, CA: Windsor Publications, Inc., 1989. Major Bibliographic References: The property contains a one-story automotive service station, which has been converted for use as a gas station and convenience store. It has a south-north orientation with a tall, non-original gas pump canopy to the south and is surrounded by a paved parking area on all sides. The building has an rectangular plan and consists of a combination of platform frame and masonry construction. It has a mansard roof clad with wood shingles and low pitch gables at the side elevations. The exterior walls are finished with painted brick on the front and side elevations and concrete block at the rear elevation. The primary (south) facade is asymmetrical and divided into two sections. It was substantially altered when the building was converted for use as a convenience store. The easternmost section was altered by the removal of the original fenestration and the installation of non-original, full-height, metal frame storefront windows. Original openings on the building’s east elevation were also enclosed with concrete block and new, smaller fixed windows installed. The facade’s western section was similarly altered with the removal of original storefront doors and windows and the installation of the existing, non-original, metal frame windows and door. Original vehicle bays in the building’s west elevation were likewise enclosed during conversion of the interior space. Description of Physical Appearance: Historic Inventory Report Thursday, October 28, 2010 Page 4 of 5 2010 Northeast and Northwest Elevations, Looking Southwest Southeast Elevation, Looking Northwest 2010 Photos 2010 Northeast and Southeast Elevations, Looking West 2010 Historic Inventory Report Thursday, October 28, 2010 Page 5 of 5 2010 Southwest and Southeast Elevations, Looking North Southwest Elevation, Looking Northeast 2010 Northwest and Southeast Elevations, Looking East 2010   Historic Inventory Report Thursday, October 28, 2010 Page 1 of 5 Identification Hetzel, Christopher Survey Name:Date Recorded: Field Recorder: Owner's Name:Greter Highlands Ltd Prtshp 10/06/2010 City: Classification:Building Resource Status:Comments: State:Zip: Within a District?No Contributing?No National Register: Local District: National Register District/Thematic Nomination Name: Owner Address: Survey/Inventory Not Eligible Eligibility Status: Determination Date: Determination Comments: Not Determined - SHPO 1/1/0001 Sunset Terrace Redevelopment Subarea 2808-2832 NE Sunset Blvd , Renton, WA 98056 Location Field Site No.DAHP No. Historic Name: Common Name:2808-2832 NE Sunset Blvd Property Address: Comments: King County T23R05E 09 Township/Range/EW Section 1/4 Sec 1/4 1/4 Sec MERCER ISLAND Quadrangle Tax No./Parcel No.7227801205 Plat/Block/Lot Acreage Supplemental Map(s) Coordinate Reference Projection: Datum: Easting: Northing: HARN (feet) Washington State Plane South 1225015 794963 Historic Inventory Report Thursday, October 28, 2010 Page 2 of 5 Description Narrative Historic Use:Commerce/Trade - Business Current Use:Commerce/Trade - Business Plan:Rectangle Stories:1 Structural System:Unreinforced Masonry Changes to Plan:Intact Changes to Interior:Unknown Changes to Original Cladding:Moderate Changes to Windows:Moderate Changes to Other:Extensive Other (specify):Facade Style: Form/Type: Cladding: Foundation: Roof Type:Roof Material: Architecture/Landscape Architecture Study Unit Other Date of Construction: Architect: Engineer: Property appears to meet criteria for the National Register of Historic Places:No Property is located in a potential historic district (National and/or local):No Property potentially contributes to a historic district (National and/or local):No Builder: Concrete - Block Veneer - StuccoModern Flat with Parapet Asphalt / Composition Concrete - Poured Commercial - Strip Commercial 1962 Built Date The property was evaluated at a reconnaissance level in a cultural resources survey completed for the proposed Sunset Terrace Redevelopment Subarea in the City of Renton, King County, Washington. It was constructed in 1962, according to the King Count tax assessor. It was originally constructed as commercial shopping center building and continues to retain this use as the “Greater Hi-Lands” shopping center. It is currently occupied by many small retail stores, including the Viet-Wah Asian Food Market, which is a major anchor. The original owner is unknown, as are the original architect and builder. Changes appear to have been made to the building’s facade to update the complex’s appearance, and some of the original storefronts have been replaced or modified. Because of these alterations, the building’s integrity is considered poor. The property has been evaluated according to the eligibility criteria for listing in the National Register of Historic Places (NRHP). The reconnaissance-level survey revealed no evidence to suggest the building is historically significant due to associations with an important event or person. The building is representative of a commercial shopping center from the early 1960s, constructed in a Modern style. However, it has lost integrity and does not appear to otherwise embody characteristics or a method of construction that would warrant special recognition, and it is not located in a cohesive neighborhood or grouping. Based on our review, the property has poor integrity and does not appear eligible for listing in the NRHP individually or as a contributor to a potential historic district. Statement of Significance: Historic Inventory Report Thursday, October 28, 2010 Page 3 of 5 City of Renton, Department of Community Development. "Community Profile." Renton, WA: Renton Department of Community Development, 1989. Slauson, Morda C. Renton From Coal to Jets. Renton, WA: Renton Historical Society, 2006. King County Tax Assessor Online Records. The Boeing Company, Renton Reporter, and City of Renton. Renton: The First Hundred Years, 1901-2001. Kent, WA: King County Journal Newspaper, 2001. Buerge, David M. Renton: Where the Water Took Wing. Chatsworth, CA: Windsor Publications, Inc., 1989. Major Bibliographic References: The property contains a large, one-story commercial shopping center building, which is part of a larger complex of three buildings. The building has a south-north orientation and is setback from NE Sunset Boulevard behind a broad, paved parking lot. Comprised of one long structure, it consists a series of commercial retail storefronts that share a common facade. The building has an irregularly shaped rectangular plan and a combination of platform frame and masonry construction. It has a flat roof with a decorative parapet at the front elevation. The exterior walls are finished with stucco at the front and side elevations and painted concrete block at the rear elevation. The primary (south) facade is characterized by a tall entablature, supported by simple square columns, that appears to have been modified from its original design during renovations to update the complex’s appearance. It has a simple design and contains a series of decorative inset panels. The panels serve as spaces for signs. Below the entablature, the storefront openings are setback from the elevation. The projecting overhang shelters a poured concrete walk that extends the length of the building and provides access to the individual stores. Several original storefronts remain intact, while others have been replaced or modified. Original storefronts are characterized by metal-frame glass doors with transoms, flanked by full-height plate glass windows. The building is connected to another building to the north by a narrow arch anchored at its southeast corner. Description of Physical Appearance: Historic Inventory Report Thursday, October 28, 2010 Page 4 of 5 East Elevation, Looking Northwest 2010 East Elevation, Looking Southwest 2010 Photos 2010 East Elevation, Looking Northwest East Elevation, Looking Southwest 2010 Historic Inventory Report Thursday, October 28, 2010 Page 5 of 5 2010 East Elevation, Looking Northwest   Historic Inventory Report Thursday, October 28, 2010 Page 1 of 4 Identification Hetzel, Christopher Survey Name:Date Recorded: Field Recorder: Owner's Name:Wong D & C 1 LLC 10/06/2010 City: Classification:Building Resource Status:Comments: State:Zip: Within a District?No Contributing?No National Register: Local District: National Register District/Thematic Nomination Name: Owner Address: Survey/Inventory Not Eligible Eligibility Status: Determination Date: Determination Comments: Not Determined - SHPO 1/1/0001 Sunset Terrace Redevelopment Subarea 2809 NE Sunset Blvd , Renton, WA 98056 Location Field Site No.DAHP No. Historic Name: Common Name:Hillcrest Bowl Property Address: Comments: King County T23R05E 09 Township/Range/EW Section 1/4 Sec 1/4 1/4 Sec MERCER ISLAND Quadrangle Tax No./Parcel No.7227900091 Plat/Block/Lot Acreage Supplemental Map(s) Coordinate Reference Projection: Datum: Easting: Northing: HARN (feet) Washington State Plane South 1225331 794720 Historic Inventory Report Thursday, October 28, 2010 Page 2 of 4 Description Narrative Historic Use:Commerce/Trade - Business Current Use:Commerce/Trade - Business Plan:Rectangle Stories:1 Structural System:Unreinforced Masonry Changes to Plan:Intact Changes to Interior:Unknown Changes to Original Cladding:Moderate Changes to Windows:Moderate Changes to Other:Moderate Other (specify):Entrances Style: Form/Type: Cladding: Foundation: Roof Type:Roof Material: Architecture/Landscape Architecture Study Unit Other Date of Construction: Architect: Engineer: Property appears to meet criteria for the National Register of Historic Places:No Property is located in a potential historic district (National and/or local):No Property potentially contributes to a historic district (National and/or local):No Builder: Concrete - Block Veneer - StuccoModern Flat with Parapet Unknown Concrete - Poured Commercial 1959 Built Date The property was evaluated at a reconnaissance level in a cultural resources survey completed for the proposed Sunset Terrace Redevelopment Subarea in the City of Renton, King County, Washington. It was constructed in 1959, according to the King Count tax assessor. It was originally constructed as bowling alley and continues to retain this use as the “Hillcrest Bowl.” The original owner is unknown, as are the original architect and builder. According to the tax assessment, substantial changes were made to the building in 1979. On the exterior, these changes appear to have been made to the building’s entrances. Because of these alterations, the building’s integrity is considered fair. The property has been evaluated according to the eligibility criteria for listing in the National Register of Historic Places (NRHP). The reconnaissance-level survey revealed no evidence to suggest the building is historically significant due to associations with an important event or person. The building is representative of a bowling alley building from the late 1950s. However, it does not appear to embody characteristics or a method of construction that would warrant special recognition, and it is not located in a cohesive neighborhood or grouping. Based on our review, the property has fair integrity and does not appear eligible for listing in the NRHP individually or as a contributor to a potential historic district. Statement of Significance: Historic Inventory Report Thursday, October 28, 2010 Page 3 of 4 City of Renton, Department of Community Development. "Community Profile." Renton, WA: Renton Department of Community Development, 1989. Slauson, Morda C. Renton From Coal to Jets. Renton, WA: Renton Historical Society, 2006. King County Tax Assessor Online Records. The Boeing Company, Renton Reporter, and City of Renton. Renton: The First Hundred Years, 1901-2001. Kent, WA: King County Journal Newspaper, 2001. Buerge, David M. Renton: Where the Water Took Wing. Chatsworth, CA: Windsor Publications, Inc., 1989. Major Bibliographic References: The property contains a one-story bowling alley building that is located on the front side of a large parcel, and surrounding by paved parking areas at the sides and rear. It has a north-south orientation and faces north toward NE Sunset Boulevard. The building has a rectangular plan and consists of masonry construction. It has a flat roof with a simple parapet. The exterior walls are finished with stucco and painted concrete block, with areas of brick surrounding the front and side entrances. Except for the entrances, the building has no fenestration and engaged pilasters offer the only division of the elevations. The building was original designed with Modern style elements, but appears to have been substantially altered by changes to the design of the entrances. The building has three inset entrances, one in the center of the primary (north) facade and two the northern portions of the side elevations. All three entrances feature pairs of metal-frame glass doors, flanked by wide metal-frame fixed windows, and are sheltered by projecting canopies that extend from the parapet. On the north and west elevations the canopies have arched roofs. All three are labeled with the name “Hillcrest Bowl.” Description of Physical Appearance: Historic Inventory Report Thursday, October 28, 2010 Page 4 of 4 Photos 2010 North Elevation, Looking Southeast Historic Inventory Report Thursday, October 28, 2010 Page 1 of 6 Identification Hetzel, Christopher Survey Name:Date Recorded: Field Recorder: Owner's Name:Alison Oakland LLC 10/06/2010 City: Classification:Building Resource Status:Comments: State:Zip: Within a District?No Contributing?No National Register: Local District: National Register District/Thematic Nomination Name: Owner Address: Survey/Inventory Eligible Eligibility Status: Determination Date: Determination Comments: Not Determined - SHPO 1/1/0001 Sunset Terrace Redevelopment Subarea Safeway 2825 NE Sunset Blvd , Renton, WA 98056 Location Field Site No.DAHP No. Historic Name: Common Name:St. Vincent de Paul Super Store Property Address: Comments: King County T23R05E 09 Township/Range/EW Section 1/4 Sec 1/4 1/4 Sec MERCER ISLAND Quadrangle Tax No./Parcel No.7227900094 Plat/Block/Lot Acreage Supplemental Map(s) Coordinate Reference Projection: Datum: Easting: Northing: HARN (feet) Washington State Plane South 1225657 795078 Historic Inventory Report Thursday, October 28, 2010 Page 2 of 6 Description Narrative Historic Use:Commerce/Trade - Business Current Use:Commerce/Trade - Business Plan:Rectangle Stories:1 Structural System:Unreinforced Masonry Changes to Plan:Intact Changes to Interior:Unknown Changes to Original Cladding:Intact Changes to Windows:Intact Changes to Other:Not Applicable Other (specify): Style: Form/Type: Cladding: Foundation: Roof Type:Roof Material: Architecture/Landscape Architecture Study Unit Other Date of Construction: Architect: Engineer: Property appears to meet criteria for the National Register of Historic Places:Yes Property is located in a potential historic district (National and/or local):No Property potentially contributes to a historic district (National and/or local):No Builder: Wood - Vertical Concrete - Block GlassModern Barrel Vault Asphalt / Composition Concrete - Poured Commercial 1964 Built Date Historic Inventory Report Thursday, October 28, 2010 Page 3 of 6 The property contains a one-story commercial supermarket building on a large parcel, setback at an angle from NE Sunset Boulevard. The building has a west-east orientation and is surrounded on the west, north, and south by a paved parking lot. It has a rectangular plan and a combination of platform frame and masonry construction. The building was originally designed in a Modern style, commonly known as the Safeway “Marina style.” The characteristic feature of this style is the building’s distinctive barrel-vault roof, which forms a sweeping canopy at the front elevation, supported by series of slender iron columns. The canopy extends nearly the full width of the elevation and shelters a poured concrete walk that provides access to the building’s primary entrances. There are two entrances on the elevation, each consisting of a pair of original, metal-frame, glass storefront doors. The entrances are embedded in a two- story expanse of original, metal-frame plate glass storefront windows that from the roof line to a low knee wall and are another defining characteristic of the Marina style. At the upper course of windows, the lower band of the glazing is painted across the center bays, and the outer bays are fully enclosed. Flanking the windows the outer sections of the front elevation are clad with narrow vertical wood siding. The building’s side and rear elevations are comprised of painted concrete block. Description of Physical Appearance: The property has been evaluated according to the eligibility criteria for listing in the National Register of Historic Places (NRHP). The former supermarket building appears to be associated with the Safeway Company and its role in the development of the Renton Highlands during the 1960s, and it is a highly recognizable example of the company’s Marina style design type for supermarket buildings. It embodies the characteristics of this style and is a distinctive modern architectural resource in the community. Based on our review, the property has good integrity and appears eligible for listing in the NRHP under criterion C at the local level of significance for its architectural style and type. The Safeway supermarket chain was first established in 1914 in Southern California. It quickly grew as a major supermarket chain, eventually becoming the world’s largest chain of retail food, with many stores in Washington State. In the late 1950s, the company developed standardized prototypical designs, known as the “Marina Plan,” for the construction of their stores. The “Marina Plan” outlined a design scheme that called for stores to have a main central arch, a high beamed ceiling, and a glass façade. In 1959, San Francisco's Marina Boulevard Safeway supermarket was the first building constructed according to this design plan. Afterwards, the Marina Plan became the design standard by which all Safeway stores were constructed through the 1960s. The building at 2825 NE Sunset Boulevard is a highly intact example of this architectural style. The property was evaluated at a reconnaissance level in a cultural resources survey completed for the proposed Sunset Terrace Redevelopment Subarea in the City of Renton, King County, Washington. It was constructed in 1964, according to the King Count tax assessor, and is believed to have been originally constructed by the Safeway Company as a supermarket. The original architect and builder are unknown. However, the building retains the distinctive characteristics of the Safeway Company’s “Marina style,” which was based on a prototype design used to design Safeway stores across the country. Statement of Significance: Historic Inventory Report Thursday, October 28, 2010 Page 4 of 6 City of Renton, Department of Community Development. Community Profile. Renton, WA: Renton Department of Community Development, 1989. Slauson, Morda C. Renton From Coal to Jets. Renton, WA: Renton Historical Society, 2006. King County Tax Assessor Online Records. The Boeing Company, Renton Reporter, and City of Renton. Renton: The First Hundred Years, 1901-2001. Kent, WA: King County Journal Newspaper, 2001. Buerge, David M. Renton: Where the Water Took Wing. Chatsworth, CA: Windsor Publications, Inc., 1989. Major Bibliographic References: Historic Inventory Report Thursday, October 28, 2010 Page 5 of 6 2010 North Elevation, Looking South West and South Elevations, Looking Northeast 2010 Photos 2010 North and West Elevations, Looking South West Elevation, Looking Northeast 2010 Historic Inventory Report Thursday, October 28, 2010 Page 6 of 6 2010 West Elevation (Detail), Looking Northwest 2010 West Elevation Detail, Looking East Historic Inventory Report Thursday, October 28, 2010 Page 1 of 4 Identification Hetzel, Christopher Greter Highlands Ltd Prtshp Survey Name:Date Recorded: Field Recorder: Owner's Name: 10/06/2010 City: Classification:Building Resource Status:Comments: State:Zip: Within a District?No Contributing?No National Register: Local District: National Register District/Thematic Nomination Name: Owner Address: Survey/Inventory Not Eligible Eligibility Status: Determination Date: Determination Comments: Not Determined - SHPO 1/1/0001 Sunset Terrace Redevelopment Subarea 2832 NE Sunset Blvd , Renton, WA 98056 Location Field Site No.DAHP No. Historic Name: Common Name:2832-2844 NE Sunset Blvd Property Address: Comments: King County T23R05E 09 Township/Range/EW Section 1/4 Sec 1/4 1/4 Sec MERCER ISLAND Quadrangle Tax No./Parcel No.7227801205 Plat/Block/Lot Acreage Supplemental Map(s) Coordinate Reference Projection: Datum: Easting: Northing: HARN (feet) Washington State Plane South 1225173 795210 Historic Inventory Report Thursday, October 28, 2010 Page 2 of 4 Description Narrative Historic Use:Commerce/Trade - Business Current Use:Commerce/Trade - Business Plan:Rectangle Stories:1 Structural System:Unreinforced Masonry Changes to Plan:Intact Changes to Interior:Unknown Changes to Original Cladding:Moderate Changes to Windows:Moderate Changes to Other:Extensive Other (specify):Facade Style: Form/Type: Cladding: Foundation: Roof Type:Roof Material: Architecture/Landscape Architecture Study Unit Other Date of Construction: Architect: Engineer: Property appears to meet criteria for the National Register of Historic Places:No Property is located in a potential historic district (National and/or local):No Property potentially contributes to a historic district (National and/or local):No Builder: Concrete - Block Veneer - StuccoModern Flat with Parapet Unknown Concrete - Poured Commercial - Strip Commercial 1958 Built Date The property was evaluated at a reconnaissance level in a cultural resources survey completed for the proposed Sunset Terrace Redevelopment Subarea in the City of Renton, King County, Washington. It was constructed in 1958, according to the King Count tax assessor. It was originally constructed as commercial shopping center building and continues to retain this use as the “Greater Hi-Lands” shopping center. It is currently occupied by many small retail stores. The original owner is unknown, as are the original architect and builder. Changes appear to have been made to the building’s facade to update the complex’s appearance, and some of the original storefronts have been replaced or modified. Because of these alterations, the building’s integrity is considered poor. The property has been evaluated according to the eligibility criteria for listing in the National Register of Historic Places (NRHP). The reconnaissance- level survey revealed no evidence to suggest the building is historically significant due to associations with an important event or person. The building is representative of a commercial shopping center from the late 1950s, constructed in a Modern style. However, it has lost integrity and does not appear to otherwise embody characteristics or a method of construction that would warrant special recognition, and it is not located in a cohesive neighborhood or grouping. Based on our review, the property has poor integrity and does not appear eligible for listing in the NRHP individually or as a contributor to a potential historic district. Statement of Significance: Historic Inventory Report Thursday, October 28, 2010 Page 3 of 4 City of Renton, Department of Community Development. Community Profile. Renton, WA: Renton Department of Community Development, 1989. Slauson, Morda C. Renton From Coal to Jets. Renton, WA: Renton Historical Society, 2006. King County Tax Assessor Online Records. The Boeing Company, Renton Reporter, and City of Renton. Renton: The First Hundred Years, 1901-2001. Kent, WA: King County Journal Newspaper, 2001. Buerge, David M. Renton: Where the Water Took Wing. Chatsworth, CA: Windsor Publications, Inc., 1989. Major Bibliographic References: The property contains a one-story commercial shopping center building, which is part of a larger complex of three buildings. The building has a south-north orientation and is setback from NE Sunset Boulevard behind a broad, paved parking lot. Comprised of one long structure, it consists a series of commercial retail storefronts that share a common facade. The building has an irregularly shaped rectangular plan and a combination of platform frame and masonry construction. It has a flat roof with a decorative parapet at the front elevation. The exterior walls are finished with stucco at the front and side elevations and painted concrete block at the rear elevation. The primary (south) facade is characterized by a tall entablature, supported by simple square columns, that appears to have been modified from its original design during renovations to update the complex’s appearance. It has a simple design and contains a series of decorative inset panels. The panels serve as spaces for signs. Below the entablature, the storefront openings are setback from the elevation. The projecting overhang shelters a poured concrete walk that extends the length of the building and provides access to the individual stores. Several original storefronts remain intact, while others have been replaced or modified. Original storefronts are characterized by metal-frame glass doors with transoms, flanked by full-height plate glass windows. The building is connected to another building to the south by a narrow arch anchored at its southwest corner. Description of Physical Appearance: Historic Inventory Report Thursday, October 28, 2010 Page 4 of 4 2010 Southeast Elevation, Looking Northwest Photos Southeast Elevation, Looking North 2010 Southeast Elevation, Looking West 2010 Historic Inventory Report Thursday, October 28, 2010 Page 1 of 4 Identification Hetzel, Christopher Survey Name:Date Recorded: Field Recorder: Owner's Name:Greter Highlands Ltd Prtshp 10/06/2010 City: Classification:Building Resource Status:Comments: State:Zip: Within a District?No Contributing?No National Register: Local District: National Register District/Thematic Nomination Name: Owner Address: Survey/Inventory Not Eligible Eligibility Status: Determination Date: Determination Comments: Not Determined - SHPO 1/1/0001 Sunset Terrace Redevelopment Subarea 2902 NE Sunset Blvd , Renton, WA 98056 Location Field Site No.DAHP No. Historic Name: Common Name:Dollar Tree Property Address: Comments: King County T23R05E 09 Township/Range/EW Section 1/4 Sec 1/4 1/4 Sec MERCER ISLAND Quadrangle Tax No./Parcel No.7227801205 Plat/Block/Lot Acreage Supplemental Map(s) Coordinate Reference Projection: Datum: Easting: Northing: HARN (feet) Washington State Plane South 1225251 795359 Historic Inventory Report Thursday, October 28, 2010 Page 2 of 4 Description Narrative Historic Use:Commerce/Trade - Department Store Current Use:Commerce/Trade - Department Store Plan:Rectangle Stories:1 Structural System:Unreinforced Masonry Changes to Plan:Intact Changes to Interior:Unknown Changes to Original Cladding:Moderate Changes to Windows:Moderate Changes to Other:Moderate Other (specify):Facade Style: Form/Type: Cladding: Foundation: Roof Type:Roof Material: Architecture/Landscape Architecture Study Unit Other Date of Construction: Architect: Engineer: Property appears to meet criteria for the National Register of Historic Places:No Property is located in a potential historic district (National and/or local):No Property potentially contributes to a historic district (National and/or local):No Builder: Brick Wood Veneer - Stucco Concrete - Block Modern Flat with Parapet Unknown Concrete - Poured Commercial 1958 Built Date The property was evaluated at a reconnaissance level in a cultural resources survey completed for the proposed Sunset Terrace Redevelopment Subarea in the City of Renton, King County, Washington. It was constructed in 1958, according to the King Count tax assessor. It appears to have been original constructed as a supermarket with a large shopping complex, but has since been converted for retail use. It is currently occupied by a Dollar Tree discount store. The original owner is unknown, as are the original architect and builder. Changes appear to have been made to the building’s facade and several of the original storefront windows have been enclosed. Because of these alterations, the building’s integrity is considered fair. The property has been evaluated according to the eligibility criteria for listing in the National Register of Historic Places (NRHP). The reconnaissance-level survey revealed no evidence to suggest the building is historically significant due to associations with an important event or person. The building is representative of a commercial supermarket or retail building from the late 1950s, constructed in a Modern style. However, it has lost integrity and does not appear to otherwise embody characteristics or a method of construction that would warrant special recognition, and it is not located in a cohesive neighborhood or grouping. Based on our review, the property has fair integrity and does not appear eligible for listing in the NRHP individually or as a contributor to a potential historic district. Statement of Significance: Historic Inventory Report Thursday, October 28, 2010 Page 3 of 4 City of Renton, Department of Community Development. Community Profile. Renton, WA: Renton Department of Community Development, 1989. Slauson, Morda C. Renton From Coal to Jets. Renton, WA: Renton Historical Society, 2006. King County Tax Assessor Online Records. The Boeing Company, Renton Reporter, and City of Renton. Renton: The First Hundred Years, 1901-2001. Kent, WA: King County Journal Newspaper, 2001. Buerge, David M. Renton: Where the Water Took Wing. Chatsworth, CA: Windsor Publications, Inc., 1989. Major Bibliographic References: The property contains a one-story commercial retail building, constructed as part of a larger complex of three buildings. The building has a south-north orientation and is setback from NE Sunset Boulevard behind a broad, paved parking lot. The building has a rectangular plan and a combination of platform frame and masonry construction. It has a flat roof with a pitched roof at the front elevation. The pitched roof is clad with composition asphalt shingles. The exterior walls are finished with stucco at the front and side elevations and painted concrete block at the rear elevation. The primary (south) facade is symmetrically. It is characterized by the pitched roof, which projects from the elevation and extends its full width. The roof features a wide dormer that centers the elevation with an open panel. The panel contains space for a large sign, which reads “DOLLAR TREE”. Identical tower features define each end of the pitched roof. They are have diagonal wood siding and both flat and pitched roof sections. The pitched roof is supported by a series of slender columns and shelters a wide poured concrete walk. The walk provides access to the building’s front entrance, which centers the elevation. The entrance consists of a central pair of metal-frame, automatic, sliding glass doors flanked by large plate glass storefront windows on either side. To either side of the entrance, the facade’s outer bays consist of panels of additional storefront windows that have been enclosed. Description of Physical Appearance: Historic Inventory Report Thursday, October 28, 2010 Page 4 of 4 Northeast and Northwest Elevations, Looking South 2010 Southeast Elevation, Looking West 2010 Photos 2010 Southeast Elevation, Looking Northwest 2010 Historic Inventory Report Thursday, October 28, 2010 Page 1 of 4 Identification Hetzel, Christopher Survey Name:Date Recorded: Field Recorder: Owner's Name:Dalpay, James W., Jr. and Jullie A. 10/06/2010 City: Classification:Building Resource Status:Comments: State:Zip: Within a District?No Contributing?No National Register: Local District: National Register District/Thematic Nomination Name: Owner Address: Survey/Inventory Not Eligible Eligibility Status: Determination Date: Determination Comments: Not Determined - SHPO 1/1/0001 Sunset Terrace Redevelopment Subarea 3309 NE Sunset Blvd , Renton, WA 98056 Location Field Site No.DAHP No. Historic Name: Common Name:3309 NE Sunset Blvd Property Address: Comments: King County T23R05E 04 Township/Range/EW Section 1/4 Sec 1/4 1/4 Sec MERCER ISLAND Quadrangle Tax No./Parcel No.423059104 Plat/Block/Lot Acreage Supplemental Map(s) Coordinate Reference Projection: Datum: Easting: Northing: HARN (feet) Washington State Plane South 1226327 796282 Historic Inventory Report Thursday, October 28, 2010 Page 2 of 4 Description Narrative Historic Use:Domestic - Single Family House Current Use:Domestic - Single Family House Plan:Rectangle Stories:1 Structural System:Platform Frame Changes to Plan:Intact Changes to Interior:Unknown Changes to Original Cladding:Slight Changes to Windows:Moderate Changes to Other:Not Applicable Other (specify): Style: Form/Type: Cladding: Foundation: Roof Type:Roof Material: Architecture/Landscape Architecture Study Unit Other Date of Construction: Architect: Engineer: Property appears to meet criteria for the National Register of Historic Places:No Property is located in a potential historic district (National and/or local):No Property potentially contributes to a historic district (National and/or local):No Builder: Wood - ClapboardArts & Crafts - Craftsman Gable - Front Gable Asphalt / Composition - Shingle Unknown Single Family 1933 Built Date The property was evaluated at a reconnaissance level in a cultural resources survey completed for the proposed Sunset Terrace Redevelopment Subarea in the City of Renton, King County, Washington. It was constructed in 1933, according to the King Count tax assessor. The original owner is unknown, as are the original architect and builder. Changes have been made to the building’s front porch and some windows, including full enclosure of the porch. Because of these alterations, the residence’s integrity is considered fair. The property has been evaluated according to the eligibility criteria for listing in the National Register of Historic Places (NRHP). The reconnaissance-level survey revealed no evidence to suggest the building is historically significant due to associations with an important event or person. The building exhibits elements of the Craftsman style. However, it does not appear to embody characteristics or a method of construction that would warrant special recognition, and it is not located in a cohesive neighborhood or grouping. Based on our review, the property has fair integrity and does not appear eligible for listing in the NRHP individually or as a contributor to a potential historic district. Statement of Significance: Historic Inventory Report Thursday, October 28, 2010 Page 3 of 4 City of Renton, Department of Community Development. "Community Profile." Renton, WA: Renton Department of Community Development, 1989. Slauson, Morda C. Renton From Coal to Jets. Renton, WA: Renton Historical Society, 2006. King County Tax Assessor Online Records. The Boeing Company, Renton Reporter, and City of Renton. Renton: The First Hundred Years, 1901-2001. Kent, WA: King County Journal Newspaper, 2001. Buerge, David M. Renton: Where the Water Took Wing. Chatsworth, CA: Windsor Publications, Inc., 1989. Major Bibliographic References: The property contains a one-story single family residence with a rectangular plan and platform frame wood construction. The residence has a northeast-southwest orientation and fronts NE Sunset Boulevard at an angle. It was originally designed with elements of the Craftsman style, but has been altered with changes to its front porch and fenestration. The residence has a front gable roof clad with composition asphalt shingles, slightly overhanging eaves, and wide fascia in the gable ends. The exterior walls are clad with horizontal wood clapboard siding. The primary (northeast) elevation is two bays wide and asymmetrically divided. A projecting front porch characterizes the eastern bay. The porch has a front gable roof and has been fully enclosed. It contains a single door opening and a non-original window. A non-original sliding window punctuates the facade’s western bay and a small, original fixed wood window is contained in the gable end. The fenestration consists of a mixture of original and non-original windows throughout the residence. Description of Physical Appearance: Historic Inventory Report Thursday, October 28, 2010 Page 4 of 4 Photos 2010 Northeast Elevation, Looking South Historic Inventory Report Monday, December 06, 2010 Page 1 of 4 Identification Hetzel, Christopher Survey Name:Date Recorded: Field Recorder: Owner's Name:Friendly Fuels, Inc. 10/06/2010 City: Classification:Building Resource Status:Comments: State:Zip: Within a District?No Contributing?No National Register: Local District: National Register District/Thematic Nomination Name: Owner Address: Survey/Inventory Eligibility Status: Determination Date: Determination Comments: Not Determined - SHPO 1/1/0001 Renton Sunset-Temp 11905 NE Sunset Blvd , Renton, WA 98056 Location Field Site No.DAHP No. Historic Name: Common Name:11905 NE Sunset Blvd Property Address: Comments: King County T23R05E 08 Township/Range/EW Section 1/4 Sec 1/4 1/4 Sec MERCER ISLAND Quadrangle Tax No./Parcel No.0823059111 Plat/Block/Lot Acreage Supplemental Map(s) Coordinate Reference Projection: Datum: Easting: Northing: HARN (feet) Washington State Plane South 1223642 794856 Historic Inventory Report Monday, December 06, 2010 Page 2 of 4 Description Narrative Historic Use:Transportation - Road-Related (vehicular)Current Use:Transportation - Road-Related (vehicular) Plan:Rectangle Stories:1 Structural System:Platform Frame Changes to Plan:Intact Changes to Interior:Unknown Changes to Original Cladding:Slight Changes to Windows:Extensive Changes to Other:Not Applicable Other (specify): Style: Form/Type: Cladding: Foundation: Roof Type:Roof Material: Architecture/Landscape Architecture Study Unit Other Date of Construction: Architect: Engineer: Property appears to meet criteria for the National Register of Historic Places:No Property is located in a potential historic district (National and/or local):No Property potentially contributes to a historic district (National and/or local):No Builder: Veneer - StuccoModern Flat with Parapet Unknown Concrete - Poured Gas Station - Convenience Store w/Canopy 1964 Built Date The property was evaluated at a reconnaissance level in a cultural resources survey completed for the proposed Sunset Terrace Redevelopment Subarea in the City of Renton, King County, Washington. It was constructed in 1964, according to the King Count tax assessor. The original owner is unknown, as are the original architect and builder. Changes have been made to the building, including the replacement of the building’s fenestration and the erection of a modern gas pump canopy. Because of these alterations, the building’s integrity is considered fair. The property has been evaluated according to the eligibility criteria for listing in the National Register of Historic Places (NRHP). The reconnaissance-level survey revealed no evidence to suggest the building is historically significant due to associations with an important event or person. The building exhibits elements of the Modern style. However, it does not appear to embody characteristics or a method of construction that would warrant special recognition, and it is not located in a cohesive neighborhood or grouping. Based on our review, the property has fair integrity and does not appear eligible for listing in the NRHP individually or as a contributor to a potential historic district. Statement of Significance: Historic Inventory Report Monday, December 06, 2010 Page 3 of 4 City of Renton, Department of Community Development. "Community Profile." Renton, WA: Renton Department of Community Development, 1989. Slauson, Morda C. Renton From Coal to Jets. Renton, WA: Renton Historical Society, 2006. King County Tax Assessor Online Records. The Boeing Company, Renton Reporter, and City of Renton. Renton: The First Hundred Years, 1901-2001. Kent, WA: King County Journal Newspaper, 2001. Buerge, David M. Renton: Where the Water Took Wing. Chatsworth, CA: Windsor Publications, Inc., 1989. Major Bibliographic References: The property contains a one-story building that serves as both an automotive gas station and a commercial retail building. It has an east-west orientation, facing north towards NE Sunset Boulevard, and consists of a wide one-story building on the south and a detached gas pump canopy to the north. The building and canopy are surrounded by a paved parking area on all sides. The building has an rectangular plan and consists of platform frame construction. It has a flat roof with a simple capped parapet. The exterior walls are finished with stucco. The primary (north) facade is asymmetrical and several bays wide. It consists of multiple storefronts, each containing plate glass metal-frame door and window openings. They are sheltered by a continuous fabric awning that extends across the front elevation. The gas pump canopy appears to be of recent construction, comprised of flat roofed canopy supported by four slender columns. The canopy shelters two islands containing four, double-sided gas pumps. Description of Physical Appearance: Historic Inventory Report Monday, December 06, 2010 Page 4 of 4 Photos 2010 North Elevation, Looking South Historic Inventory Report Thursday, October 28, 2010 Page 1 of 6 Identification Hetzel, Christopher PO Box 2316 Survey Name:Date Recorded: Field Recorder: Owner's Name:Renton Housing Authority 10/06/2010 City:Renton Classification:Building Resource Status:Comments: State:WA Zip:98056-0316 Within a District?No Contributing?No National Register: Local District: National Register District/Thematic Nomination Name: Owner Address: Survey/Inventory Not Eligible Eligibility Status: Determination Date: Determination Comments: Not Determined - SHPO 1/1/0001 Sunset Terrace Redevelopment Subarea Sunset Terrace Public Housing Complex 2601 Sunset Ln NE, Renton, WA 98056 Location Field Site No.DAHP No. Historic Name: Common Name:2601 Sunset Ln NE Property Address: Comments: King County T23R05E 04 Township/Range/EW Section 1/4 Sec 1/4 1/4 Sec MERCER ISLAND Quadrangle Tax No./Parcel No.7227801400 Plat/Block/Lot Acreage Supplemental Map(s) Coordinate Reference Projection: Datum: Easting: Northing: HARN (feet) Washington State Plane South 1224178 794811 Historic Inventory Report Thursday, October 28, 2010 Page 2 of 6 Description Narrative Historic Use:Domestic - Multiple Family House Current Use:Domestic - Multiple Family House Plan:Rectangle Stories:1 Structural System:Platform Frame Changes to Plan:Intact Changes to Interior:Unknown Changes to Original Cladding:Extensive Changes to Windows:Extensive Changes to Other:Not Applicable Other (specify): Style: Form/Type: Cladding: Foundation: Roof Type:Roof Material: Architecture/Landscape Architecture Study Unit Other Date of Construction: Architect:George W. Stoddard-Huggard & Associates Engineer: Property appears to meet criteria for the National Register of Historic Places:No Property is located in a potential historic district (National and/or local):No Property potentially contributes to a historic district (National and/or local):No Builder:Dahlgren Construction Company Veneer - Vinyl SidingModern Gable - Side Gable Asphalt / Composition - Shingle Concrete - Poured Multi-Family 1977 Remodel 1959 Built Date Historic Inventory Report Thursday, October 28, 2010 Page 3 of 6 The property has been evaluated according to the eligibility criteria for listing in the National Register of Historic Places (NRHP). Due to the many alterations, the integrity of the individual buildings and the complex as a whole is considered poor. The Sunset Terrace public housing complex resulted from federal investment in public housing during the postwar period and is associated with a well-known Seattle architect. However, it is a late example of its architectural type and its individual elements were substantially altered by rehabilitations in the 1970s and 1990s, such that they no longer appear to retain sufficient integrity to convey their historical significance. Based on our review, the property has poor integrity and does not appear eligible for listing in the NRHP individually or as a potential historic district. Stoddard’s design for Sunset Terrace appears to have been strongly influenced by the Garden City movement and exhibits features and characteristics of garden style apartments. All 27 buildings were arranged along curvilinear streets in locations to best take advantage of the original topography and create open, pleasing landscapes for residents. Throughout Sunset Terrace, each building is separated by open courtyard areas with outdoor space dedicated to individual housing units. At the rear of each unit, this space was originally identified by unit-specific metal revolving clotheslines. Additional design features included minimal ornamentation, aluminum windows, and varied exterior wall cladding of horizontal rustic cedar siding, vertical rough cedar channel siding, or resawn split cedar shake siding with some brick veneer. The Renton Housing Authority completed a comprehensive rehabilitation of Sunset Terrace in the 1970s, which resulted in the removal and replacement of many of these features. The original windows were replaced with new metal windows, unit doors were replaced, the revolving clotheslines were removed, and the original cedar wall claddings were replaced with vinyl siding. Subsequent changes occurred in the early 1990s when buildings in the complex were upgraded for ADA accessibility. Kitchens and bathrooms in the individual housing units were also substantially renovated at this time. The property was evaluated at a reconnaissance level in a cultural resources survey completed for the proposed Sunset Terrace Redevelopment Subarea in the City of Renton, King County, Washington. It is one of 27 buildings constructed by the Housing Authority of the City of Renton as part of the Sunset Terrace public housing complex authorized on June 28, 1958 and completed in 1959. Sunset Terrace consisted of a complex of 100 low-income housing units comprising both one- and two-story structures arranged along curvilinear streets. The complex was constructed by Seattle-based Dahlgren Construction Company according to designs by George W. Stoddard-Huggard & Associates. George W. Stoddard, a prominent Seattle architect and principal of the firm, is credited with the design of many well known public, private, and civic structures in the Seattle area, including such noted properties as the High School Memorial Stadium, the Green Lake Aqua Theater, and the Yesler Terrace Defense Housing Project. Stoddard retired in 1960, and the Sunset Terrace public housing complex is believed to have been one of his last commissions. Statement of Significance: Historic Inventory Report Thursday, October 28, 2010 Page 4 of 6 The property contains a one-story four unit apartment building constructed as part of the Sunset Terrace public housing complex in 1958-1959. Buildings in the complex were designed in one of six standard design types, each exhibiting Modern style elements. This building was constructed as a type “A” building. The building has a long rectangular plan and consists of platform frame wood construction on a poured concrete foundation. It has a very low pitch side gable roof clad with composition asphalt shingles and featuring slightly overhanging eaves with a wide fascia. The exterior walls are clad with non-original horizontally applied vinyl siding. This siding replaced the building’s original horizontally applied, resawn split cedar shake siding siding during rehabilitation of the building in the 1970s. The building has a south- north orientation and its primary (south) facade fronts Harrington Avenue NE. The primary facade is symmetrically divided and consists of four nearly identical sections, each comprising a single housing unit. Each section consists of a single door opening fit with a non-original paneled door, flanked by a wide tripartite picture window and a small metal-sliding window. The doors open onto poured concrete stoops connected to poured concrete sidewalks that lead to the street. The building’s rear elevation is similarly divided, each section containing a single door opening flanked by slightly smaller tripartite picture window and another small sliding window. The building’s side elevations are unadorned. All of the building’s original windows were replaced with non-original metal windows in the 1970s. Other alterations to the building include the removal of original metal revolving clothes lines outside the rear entrance of each unit, and complete renovations of the building’s bathrooms and kitchens and ADA accessibility improvements in the early 1990s. Description of Physical Appearance: Historic Inventory Report Thursday, October 28, 2010 Page 5 of 6 Ochsner, Jeffery Karl, ed. Shaping Seattle Architecture: A Historical Guide to the Architects. Seattle, WA: University of Washington Press, 1998. Lord, Tom Forrester. Decent Housing: A Promise to Keep. Federal Housing Policy and its Impact on the City. Cambridge, MA: Schenkman Publishing Company, Inc., 1977. Madison, Charles A. Preface. In How the Other Half Lives. Jacob A. Riis. New York, NY: Dover Publications, Inc., 1971. __________. "Obituaries: George W. Stoddard." 29 September 1967:16. Seattle, WA. Rabinowitz, Alan. Urban Economics and Land Use in America: The Transformation of Cities in the Twentieth Century. Armonk, NY: M.E. Sharpe, Inc., 2004. The Seattle Times. "Seattle Firm Supported for Housing Job." 18 March 1959:44. Seattle, WA. Elenga, Maureen R. Seattle Architecture: A Walking Guide to Downtown. Seattle, WA: Seattle Architecture Foundation, 2007. Associated Press. "Tacoma Gets Housing Blues; To Renton It’s Not News." The Seattle Times. Seattle, WA, 29 June 1958. George W. Stoddard-Huggard & Associates. "Housing Authority of the City of Renton: Project Washington II-I, Renton Highlands, Renton, Washington." Construction Plans. Seattle, WA: George W. Stoddard- Huggard & Associates Architects & Engineers, 1958. On file with Renton Housing Authority, Renton, WA. Karolak, Eric J. "No Idea of Doing Anything Wonderful: The Labor-Crisis Origins of National Housing Policy and the Reconstruction of the Working-Class Community, 1917-1919." In From Tenemants to the Taylor Homes; In Search of an Urban Housing Policy in Twentieth-Century American. John F. Bauman, Roger Biles, Kristin M. Szylvian, eds. pp. 60-80. University Park, PA: Pennsylvania State University, 2000. Hanchett, Thomas W. "The Other 'Subsidized Housing': Federal Aid to Suburbanization, 1940-1960s." In From Tenements to the Taylor Homes; In Search of an Urban Housing Policy in Twentieth-Century American. John F. Bauman, Roger Biles, Kristin M. Szylvian, eds. Pp. 163-179. University Park, PA: Pennsylvania State University, 2000. Howard, Ebenezer. Garden Cities of Tomorrow. London: Swan Sonnenschein & Co., Ltd., 1902. Major Bibliographic References: Historic Inventory Report Thursday, October 28, 2010 Page 6 of 6 2010 South and East Elevations, Looking West Photos South Elevation, Looking West 2010 South Elevation, Looking West 2010 Historic Inventory Report Thursday, October 28, 2010 Page 1 of 6 Identification Hetzel, Christopher PO Box 2316 Survey Name:Date Recorded: Field Recorder: Owner's Name:Renton Housing Authority 10/06/2010 City:Renton Classification:Building Resource Status:Comments: State:WA Zip:98056-0316 Within a District?No Contributing?No National Register: Local District: National Register District/Thematic Nomination Name: Owner Address: Survey/Inventory Not Eligible Eligibility Status: Determination Date: Determination Comments: Not Determined - SHPO 1/1/0001 Sunset Terrace Redevelopment Subarea Sunset Terrace Public Housing Complex 2605 Sunset Ln NE, Renton, WA 98056 Location Field Site No.DAHP No. Historic Name: Common Name:2605 Sunset Ln NE Property Address: Comments: King County T23R05E 04 Township/Range/EW Section 1/4 Sec 1/4 1/4 Sec MERCER ISLAND Quadrangle Tax No./Parcel No.7227801055 Plat/Block/Lot Acreage Supplemental Map(s) Coordinate Reference Projection: Datum: Easting: Northing: HARN (feet) Washington State Plane South 1224147 794734 Historic Inventory Report Thursday, October 28, 2010 Page 2 of 6 Description Narrative Historic Use:Domestic - Multiple Family House Current Use:Domestic - Multiple Family House Plan:Rectangle Stories:1 Structural System:Platform Frame Changes to Plan:Intact Changes to Interior:Unknown Changes to Original Cladding:Extensive Changes to Windows:Extensive Changes to Other:Not Applicable Other (specify): Style: Form/Type: Cladding: Foundation: Roof Type:Roof Material: Architecture/Landscape Architecture Study Unit Other Date of Construction: Architect:George W. Stoddard-Huggard & Associates Engineer: Property appears to meet criteria for the National Register of Historic Places:No Property is located in a potential historic district (National and/or local):No Property potentially contributes to a historic district (National and/or local):No Builder:Dahlgren Construction Company Veneer - Vinyl SidingModern Gable - Side Gable Asphalt / Composition - Shingle Concrete - Poured Multi-Family 1977 Remodel 1959 Built Date Historic Inventory Report Thursday, October 28, 2010 Page 3 of 6 The property has been evaluated according to the eligibility criteria for listing in the National Register of Historic Places (NRHP). Due to the many alterations, the integrity of the individual buildings and the complex as a whole is considered poor. The Sunset Terrace public housing complex resulted from federal investment in public housing during the postwar period and is associated with a well-known Seattle architect. However, it is a late example of its architectural type and its individual elements were substantially altered by rehabilitations in the 1970s and 1990s, such that they no longer appear to retain sufficient integrity to convey their historical significance. Based on our review, the property has poor integrity and does not appear eligible for listing in the NRHP individually or as a potential historic district. Stoddard’s design for Sunset Terrace appears to have been strongly influenced by the Garden City movement and exhibits features and characteristics of garden style apartments. All 27 buildings were arranged along curvilinear streets in locations to best take advantage of the original topography and create open, pleasing landscapes for residents. Throughout Sunset Terrace, each building is separated by open courtyard areas with outdoor space dedicated to individual housing units. At the rear of each unit, this space was originally identified by unit-specific metal revolving clotheslines. Additional design features included minimal ornamentation, aluminum windows, and varied exterior wall cladding of horizontal rustic cedar siding, vertical rough cedar channel siding, or resawn split cedar shake siding with some brick veneer. The Renton Housing Authority completed a comprehensive rehabilitation of Sunset Terrace in the 1970s, which resulted in the removal and replacement of many of these features. The original windows were replaced with new metal windows, unit doors were replaced, the revolving clotheslines were removed, and the original cedar wall claddings were replaced with vinyl siding. Subsequent changes occurred in the early 1990s when buildings in the complex were upgraded for ADA accessibility. Kitchens and bathrooms in the individual housing units were also substantially renovated at this time. The property was evaluated at a reconnaissance level in a cultural resources survey completed for the proposed Sunset Terrace Redevelopment Subarea in the City of Renton, King County, Washington. It is one of 27 buildings constructed by the Housing Authority of the City of Renton as part of the Sunset Terrace public housing complex authorized on June 28, 1958 and completed in 1959. Sunset Terrace consisted of a complex of 100 low-income housing units comprising both one- and two-story structures arranged along curvilinear streets. The complex was constructed by Seattle-based Dahlgren Construction Company according to designs by George W. Stoddard-Huggard & Associates. George W. Stoddard, a prominent Seattle architect and principal of the firm, is credited with the design of many well known public, private, and civic structures in the Seattle area, including such noted properties as the High School Memorial Stadium, the Green Lake Aqua Theater, and the Yesler Terrace Defense Housing Project. Stoddard retired in 1960, and the Sunset Terrace public housing complex is believed to have been one of his last commissions. Statement of Significance: Historic Inventory Report Thursday, October 28, 2010 Page 4 of 6 The property contains a one-story two unit apartment building constructed as part of the Sunset Terrace public housing complex in 1958-1959. Buildings in the complex were designed in one of six standard design types, each exhibiting Modern style elements. This building was constructed as a type “B” building. The building has a long rectangular plan and consists of platform frame wood construction on a poured concrete foundation. It has a very low pitch side gable roof clad with composition asphalt shingles and featuring slightly overhanging eaves with a wide fascia. The exterior walls are clad with non-original horizontally applied vinyl siding. This siding replaced the building’s original horizontally applied, resawn split cedar shake siding during rehabilitation of the building in the 1970s. The building has a east-west orientation and its primary (east) facade fronts Sunset Lane NE. The primary facade is symmetrically divided and consists of four nearly identical sections, each comprising a single housing unit. Each section consists of a single door opening fit with a non-original paneled door, flanked by a wide tripartite picture window and a small metal-sliding window. The doors open onto poured concrete stoops connected to poured concrete sidewalks and steps that lead to the street. The building’s rear elevation is similarly divided, each section containing a single door opening flanked by slightly smaller tripartite picture window and another small sliding window. The building’s side elevations are unadorned. All of the building’s original windows were replaced with non-original metal windows in the 1970s. Other alterations to the building include the removal of original metal revolving clothes lines outside the rear entrance of each unit, and complete renovations of the building’s bathrooms and kitchens and ADA accessibility improvements in the early 1990s. Description of Physical Appearance: Historic Inventory Report Thursday, October 28, 2010 Page 5 of 6 Ochsner, Jeffery Karl, ed. Shaping Seattle Architecture: A Historical Guide to the Architects. Seattle, WA: University of Washington Press, 1998. Lord, Tom Forrester. Decent Housing: A Promise to Keep. Federal Housing Policy and its Impact on the City. Cambridge, MA: Schenkman Publishing Company, Inc., 1977. Madison, Charles A. Preface. In How the Other Half Lives. Jacob A. Riis. New York, NY: Dover Publications, Inc., 1971. __________. "Obituaries: George W. Stoddard." 29 September 1967:16. Seattle, WA. Rabinowitz, Alan. Urban Economics and Land Use in America: The Transformation of Cities in the Twentieth Century. Armonk, NY: M.E. Sharpe, Inc., 2004. The Seattle Times. "Seattle Firm Supported for Housing Job." 18 March 1959:44. Seattle, WA. Elenga, Maureen R. Seattle Architecture: A Walking Guide to Downtown. Seattle, WA: Seattle Architecture Foundation, 2007. Associated Press. "Tacoma Gets Housing Blues; To Renton It’s Not News." The Seattle Times. Seattle, WA, 29 June 1958. George W. Stoddard-Huggard & Associates. "Housing Authority of the City of Renton: Project Washington II-I, Renton Highlands, Renton, Washington." Construction Plans. Seattle, WA: George W. Stoddard- Huggard & Associates Architects & Engineers, 1958. On file with Renton Housing Authority, Renton, WA. Karolak, Eric J. "No Idea of Doing Anything Wonderful: The Labor-Crisis Origins of National Housing Policy and the Reconstruction of the Working-Class Community, 1917-1919." In From Tenemants to the Taylor Homes; In Search of an Urban Housing Policy in Twentieth-Century American. John F. Bauman, Roger Biles, Kristin M. Szylvian, eds. pp. 60-80. University Park, PA: Pennsylvania State University, 2000. Hanchett, Thomas W. "The Other 'Subsidized Housing': Federal Aid to Suburbanization, 1940-1960s." In From Tenements to the Taylor Homes; In Search of an Urban Housing Policy in Twentieth-Century American. John F. Bauman, Roger Biles, Kristin M. Szylvian, eds. Pp. 163-179. University Park, PA: Pennsylvania State University, 2000. Howard, Ebenezer. Garden Cities of Tomorrow. London: Swan Sonnenschein & Co., Ltd., 1902. Major Bibliographic References: Historic Inventory Report Thursday, October 28, 2010 Page 6 of 6 South Elevation, Looking Northwest 2010 East and North Elevations, Looking Southwest 2010 Photos East Elevation, Looking West 2010 South and East Elevation, Looking Northwest 2010 Historic Inventory Report Thursday, October 28, 2010 Page 1 of 6 Identification Hetzel, Christopher PO Box 2316 Survey Name:Date Recorded: Field Recorder: Owner's Name:Renton Housing Authority 10/06/2010 City:Renton Classification:Building Resource Status:Comments: State:WA Zip:98056-0316 Within a District?No Contributing?No National Register: Local District: National Register District/Thematic Nomination Name: Owner Address: Survey/Inventory Not Eligible Eligibility Status: Determination Date: Determination Comments: Not Determined - SHPO 1/1/0001 Sunset Terrace Redevelopment Subarea Sunset Terrace Public Housing Complex 2606 Sunset Ln NE, Renton, WA 98056 Location Field Site No.DAHP No. Historic Name: Common Name:2606 Sunset Ln NE Property Address: Comments: King County T23R05E 09 Township/Range/EW Section 1/4 Sec 1/4 1/4 Sec MERCER ISLAND Quadrangle Tax No./Parcel No.7227801055 Plat/Block/Lot Acreage Supplemental Map(s) Coordinate Reference Projection: Datum: Easting: Northing: HARN (feet) Washington State Plane South 1224251 794706 Historic Inventory Report Thursday, October 28, 2010 Page 2 of 6 Description Narrative Historic Use:Domestic - Multiple Family House Current Use:Domestic - Multiple Family House Plan:Rectangle Stories:1 Structural System:Platform Frame Changes to Plan:Intact Changes to Interior:Unknown Changes to Original Cladding:Extensive Changes to Windows:Extensive Changes to Other:Not Applicable Other (specify): Style: Form/Type: Cladding: Foundation: Roof Type:Roof Material: Architecture/Landscape Architecture Study Unit Other Date of Construction: Architect:George W. Stoddard-Huggard & Associates Engineer: Property appears to meet criteria for the National Register of Historic Places:No Property is located in a potential historic district (National and/or local):No Property potentially contributes to a historic district (National and/or local):No Builder:Dahlgren Construction Company Veneer - Vinyl SidingModern Gable - Side Gable Asphalt / Composition - Shingle Concrete - Poured Multi-Family 1977 Remodel 1959 Built Date Historic Inventory Report Thursday, October 28, 2010 Page 3 of 6 The property has been evaluated according to the eligibility criteria for listing in the National Register of Historic Places (NRHP). Due to the many alterations, the integrity of the individual buildings and the complex as a whole is considered poor. The Sunset Terrace public housing complex resulted from federal investment in public housing during the postwar period and is associated with a well-known Seattle architect. However, it is a late example of its architectural type and its individual elements were substantially altered by rehabilitations in the 1970s and 1990s, such that they no longer appear to retain sufficient integrity to convey their historical significance. Based on our review, the property has poor integrity and does not appear eligible for listing in the NRHP individually or as a potential historic district. Stoddard’s design for Sunset Terrace appears to have been strongly influenced by the Garden City movement and exhibits features and characteristics of garden style apartments. All 27 buildings were arranged along curvilinear streets in locations to best take advantage of the original topography and create open, pleasing landscapes for residents. Throughout Sunset Terrace, each building is separated by open courtyard areas with outdoor space dedicated to individual housing units. At the rear of each unit, this space was originally identified by unit-specific metal revolving clotheslines. Additional design features included minimal ornamentation, aluminum windows, and varied exterior wall cladding of horizontal rustic cedar siding, vertical rough cedar channel siding, or resawn split cedar shake siding with some brick veneer. The Renton Housing Authority completed a comprehensive rehabilitation of Sunset Terrace in the 1970s, which resulted in the removal and replacement of many of these features. The original windows were replaced with new metal windows, unit doors were replaced, the revolving clotheslines were removed, and the original cedar wall claddings were replaced with vinyl siding. Subsequent changes occurred in the early 1990s when buildings in the complex were upgraded for ADA accessibility. Kitchens and bathrooms in the individual housing units were also substantially renovated at this time. The property was evaluated at a reconnaissance level in a cultural resources survey completed for the proposed Sunset Terrace Redevelopment Subarea in the City of Renton, King County, Washington. It is one of 27 buildings constructed by the Housing Authority of the City of Renton as part of the Sunset Terrace public housing complex authorized on June 28, 1958 and completed in 1959. Sunset Terrace consisted of a complex of 100 low-income housing units comprising both one- and two-story structures arranged along curvilinear streets. The complex was constructed by Seattle-based Dahlgren Construction Company according to designs by George W. Stoddard-Huggard & Associates. George W. Stoddard, a prominent Seattle architect and principal of the firm, is credited with the design of many well known public, private, and civic structures in the Seattle area, including such noted properties as the High School Memorial Stadium, the Green Lake Aqua Theater, and the Yesler Terrace Defense Housing Project. Stoddard retired in 1960, and the Sunset Terrace public housing complex is believed to have been one of his last commissions. Statement of Significance: Historic Inventory Report Thursday, October 28, 2010 Page 4 of 6 The property contains a one-story two unit apartment building constructed as part of the Sunset Terrace public housing complex in 1958-1959. Buildings in the complex were designed in one of six standard design types, each exhibiting Modern style elements. This building was constructed as a type “B” building. The building has a long rectangular plan and consists of platform frame wood construction on a poured concrete foundation. It has a very low pitch side gable roof clad with composition asphalt shingles and featuring slightly overhanging eaves with a wide fascia. The exterior walls are clad with non-original horizontally applied vinyl siding. This siding replaced the building’s original horizontally applied, rustic cedar beveled siding during rehabilitation of the building in the 1970s. The building has a north-south orientation and its primary (north) facade fronts Sunset Lane NE. The primary facade is symmetrically divided and consists of four nearly identical sections, each comprising a single housing unit. Each section consists of a single door opening fit with a non-original paneled door, flanked by a wide tripartite picture window and a small metal-sliding window. The doors open onto poured concrete stoops connected to poured concrete sidewalks that lead to the street. The building’s rear elevation is similarly divided, each section containing a single door opening flanked by slightly smaller tripartite picture window and another small sliding window. The building’s side elevations are unadorned. All of the building’s original windows were replaced with non-original metal windows in the 1970s. Other alterations to the building include the removal of original metal revolving clothes lines outside the rear entrance of each unit, and complete renovations of the building’s bathrooms and kitchens and ADA accessibility improvements in the early 1990s. Description of Physical Appearance: Historic Inventory Report Thursday, October 28, 2010 Page 5 of 6 Ochsner, Jeffery Karl, ed. Shaping Seattle Architecture: A Historical Guide to the Architects. Seattle, WA: University of Washington Press, 1998. Lord, Tom Forrester. Decent Housing: A Promise to Keep. Federal Housing Policy and its Impact on the City. Cambridge, MA: Schenkman Publishing Company, Inc., 1977. Madison, Charles A. Preface. In How the Other Half Lives. Jacob A. Riis. New York, NY: Dover Publications, Inc., 1971. __________. "Obituaries: George W. Stoddard." 29 September 1967:16. Seattle, WA. Rabinowitz, Alan. Urban Economics and Land Use in America: The Transformation of Cities in the Twentieth Century. Armonk, NY: M.E. Sharpe, Inc., 2004. The Seattle Times. "Seattle Firm Supported for Housing Job." 18 March 1959:44. Seattle, WA. Elenga, Maureen R. Seattle Architecture: A Walking Guide to Downtown. Seattle, WA: Seattle Architecture Foundation, 2007. Associated Press. "Tacoma Gets Housing Blues; To Renton It’s Not News." The Seattle Times. Seattle, WA, 29 June 1958. George W. Stoddard-Huggard & Associates. "Housing Authority of the City of Renton: Project Washington II-I, Renton Highlands, Renton, Washington." Construction Plans. Seattle, WA: George W. Stoddard- Huggard & Associates Architects & Engineers, 1958. On file with Renton Housing Authority, Renton, WA. Karolak, Eric J. "No Idea of Doing Anything Wonderful: The Labor-Crisis Origins of National Housing Policy and the Reconstruction of the Working-Class Community, 1917-1919." In From Tenemants to the Taylor Homes; In Search of an Urban Housing Policy in Twentieth-Century American. John F. Bauman, Roger Biles, Kristin M. Szylvian, eds. pp. 60-80. University Park, PA: Pennsylvania State University, 2000. Hanchett, Thomas W. "The Other 'Subsidized Housing': Federal Aid to Suburbanization, 1940-1960s." In From Tenements to the Taylor Homes; In Search of an Urban Housing Policy in Twentieth-Century American. John F. Bauman, Roger Biles, Kristin M. Szylvian, eds. Pp. 163-179. University Park, PA: Pennsylvania State University, 2000. Howard, Ebenezer. Garden Cities of Tomorrow. London: Swan Sonnenschein & Co., Ltd., 1902. Major Bibliographic References: Historic Inventory Report Thursday, October 28, 2010 Page 6 of 6 2010 Northwest Elevation, Looking Southeast Photos Northwest and Northeast Elevations, Looking South 2010 Southwest and Northwest Elevations, Looking East 2010 Historic Inventory Report Thursday, October 28, 2010 Page 1 of 6 Identification Hetzel, Christopher PO Box 2316 Survey Name:Date Recorded: Field Recorder: Owner's Name:Renton Housing Authority 10/06/2010 City:Renton Classification:Building Resource Status:Comments: State:WA Zip:98056-0316 Within a District?No Contributing?No National Register: Local District: National Register District/Thematic Nomination Name: Owner Address: Survey/Inventory Not Eligible Eligibility Status: Determination Date: Determination Comments: Not Determined - SHPO 1/1/0001 Sunset Terrace Redevelopment Subarea Sunset Terrace Public Housing Complex 2611 Sunset Ln NE, Renton, WA 98056 Location Field Site No.DAHP No. Historic Name: Common Name:2611 Sunset Ln NE Property Address: Comments: King County T23R05E 09 Township/Range/EW Section 1/4 Sec 1/4 1/4 Sec MERCER ISLAND Quadrangle Tax No./Parcel No.7227801055 Plat/Block/Lot Acreage Supplemental Map(s) Coordinate Reference Projection: Datum: Easting: Northing: HARN (feet) Washington State Plane South 1224140 794642 Historic Inventory Report Thursday, October 28, 2010 Page 2 of 6 Description Narrative Historic Use:Domestic - Multiple Family House Current Use:Domestic - Multiple Family House Plan:Rectangle Stories:2 Structural System:Platform Frame Changes to Plan:Intact Changes to Interior:Unknown Changes to Original Cladding:Extensive Changes to Windows:Extensive Changes to Other:Not Applicable Other (specify): Style: Form/Type: Cladding: Foundation: Roof Type:Roof Material: Architecture/Landscape Architecture Study Unit Other Date of Construction: Architect:George W. Stoddard-Huggard & Associates Engineer: Property appears to meet criteria for the National Register of Historic Places:No Property is located in a potential historic district (National and/or local):No Property potentially contributes to a historic district (National and/or local):No Builder:Dahlgren Construction Company Veneer - Vinyl SidingModern Gable - Side Gable Asphalt / Composition - Shingle Concrete - Poured Multi-Family 1977 Remodel 1959 Built Date Historic Inventory Report Thursday, October 28, 2010 Page 3 of 6 The property has been evaluated according to the eligibility criteria for listing in the National Register of Historic Places (NRHP). Due to the many alterations, the integrity of the individual buildings and the complex as a whole is considered poor. The Sunset Terrace public housing complex resulted from federal investment in public housing during the postwar period and is associated with a well-known Seattle architect. However, it is a late example of its architectural type and its individual elements were substantially altered by rehabilitations in the 1970s and 1990s, such that they no longer appear to retain sufficient integrity to convey their historical significance. Based on our review, the property has poor integrity and does not appear eligible for listing in the NRHP individually or as a potential historic district. Stoddard’s design for Sunset Terrace appears to have been strongly influenced by the Garden City movement and exhibits features and characteristics of garden style apartments. All 27 buildings were arranged along curvilinear streets in locations to best take advantage of the original topography and create open, pleasing landscapes for residents. Throughout Sunset Terrace, each building is separated by open courtyard areas with outdoor space dedicated to individual housing units. At the rear of each unit, this space was originally identified by unit-specific metal revolving clotheslines. Additional design features included minimal ornamentation, aluminum windows, and varied exterior wall cladding of horizontal rustic cedar siding, vertical rough cedar channel siding, or resawn split cedar shake siding with some brick veneer. The Renton Housing Authority completed a comprehensive rehabilitation of Sunset Terrace in the 1970s, which resulted in the removal and replacement of many of these features. The original windows were replaced with new metal windows, unit doors were replaced, the revolving clotheslines were removed, and the original cedar wall claddings were replaced with vinyl siding. Subsequent changes occurred in the early 1990s when buildings in the complex were upgraded for ADA accessibility. Kitchens and bathrooms in the individual housing units were also substantially renovated at this time. The property was evaluated at a reconnaissance level in a cultural resources survey completed for the proposed Sunset Terrace Redevelopment Subarea in the City of Renton, King County, Washington. It is one of 27 buildings constructed by the Housing Authority of the City of Renton as part of the Sunset Terrace public housing complex authorized on June 28, 1958 and completed in 1959. Sunset Terrace consisted of a complex of 100 low-income housing units comprising both one- and two-story structures arranged along curvilinear streets. The complex was constructed by Seattle-based Dahlgren Construction Company according to designs by George W. Stoddard-Huggard & Associates. George W. Stoddard, a prominent Seattle architect and principal of the firm, is credited with the design of many well known public, private, and civic structures in the Seattle area, including such noted properties as the High School Memorial Stadium, the Green Lake Aqua Theater, and the Yesler Terrace Defense Housing Project. Stoddard retired in 1960, and the Sunset Terrace public housing complex is believed to have been one of his last commissions. Statement of Significance: Historic Inventory Report Thursday, October 28, 2010 Page 4 of 6 The property contains a two-story four unit apartment building constructed as part of the Sunset Terrace public housing complex in 1958-1959. Buildings in the complex were designed in one of six standard design types, each exhibiting Modern style elements. This building was constructed as a type “C” building. The building has a long rectangular plan and consists of platform frame wood construction on a poured concrete foundation. It has a very low pitch side gable roof clad with composition asphalt shingles and featuring slightly overhanging eaves with a wide fascia. Four small cylindrical, metal roof vents stand equally spaced along the roof ridge line. The exterior walls are clad with non-original horizontally applied vinyl siding. This siding replaced the building’s original, horizontally applied, rustic cedar beveled siding during rehabilitation of the building in the 1970s. The building has a east-west orientation and its primary (east) facade fronts Sunset Lane NE. The primary facade is symmetrically divided and consists of four nearly identical sections, each comprising a single housing unit. On the first story, each section consists of a single door opening fit with a non-original paneled door, flanked by a wide tripartite picture window. Two cantilevered shed roofs extend between the sections sheltering each pair of door openings. The doors open onto poured concrete stoops connected to poured concrete sidewalks that lead to the street. On the second story, the two outer sections are punctuated by a slightly shorter, tripartite picture window and by two tripartite picture windows in the center sections. The building’s rear elevation is similarly divided, each section containing a single door opening flanked by a wide tripartite picture window on the first story, and featuring a wide tripartite picture window and a small metal sliding window in the outer bays and two tripartite picture windows and a small sliding window in the center bays on the second story. The two center sections on the second story projects from the elevation, cantilevered over the first story. The building’s side elevations are unadorned. All of the building’s original windows were replaced with non-original metal windows in the 1970s. Other alterations to the building include the removal of original metal revolving clothes lines outside the rear entrance of each unit, and complete renovations of the building’s bathrooms and kitchens and ADA accessibility improvements in the early 1990s. Description of Physical Appearance: Historic Inventory Report Thursday, October 28, 2010 Page 5 of 6 Ochsner, Jeffery Karl, ed. Shaping Seattle Architecture: A Historical Guide to the Architects. Seattle, WA: University of Washington Press, 1998. Lord, Tom Forrester. Decent Housing: A Promise to Keep. Federal Housing Policy and its Impact on the City. Cambridge, MA: Schenkman Publishing Company, Inc., 1977. Madison, Charles A. Preface. In How the Other Half Lives. Jacob A. Riis. New York, NY: Dover Publications, Inc., 1971. __________. "Obituaries: George W. Stoddard." 29 September 1967:16. Seattle, WA. Rabinowitz, Alan. Urban Economics and Land Use in America: The Transformation of Cities in the Twentieth Century. Armonk, NY: M.E. Sharpe, Inc., 2004. The Seattle Times. "Seattle Firm Supported for Housing Job." 18 March 1959:44. Seattle, WA. Elenga, Maureen R. Seattle Architecture: A Walking Guide to Downtown. Seattle, WA: Seattle Architecture Foundation, 2007. Associated Press. "Tacoma Gets Housing Blues; To Renton It’s Not News." The Seattle Times. Seattle, WA, 29 June 1958. George W. Stoddard-Huggard & Associates. "Housing Authority of the City of Renton: Project Washington II-I, Renton Highlands, Renton, Washington." Construction Plans. Seattle, WA: George W. Stoddard- Huggard & Associates Architects & Engineers, 1958. On file with Renton Housing Authority, Renton, WA. Karolak, Eric J. "No Idea of Doing Anything Wonderful: The Labor-Crisis Origins of National Housing Policy and the Reconstruction of the Working-Class Community, 1917-1919." In From Tenemants to the Taylor Homes; In Search of an Urban Housing Policy in Twentieth-Century American. John F. Bauman, Roger Biles, Kristin M. Szylvian, eds. pp. 60-80. University Park, PA: Pennsylvania State University, 2000. Hanchett, Thomas W. "The Other 'Subsidized Housing': Federal Aid to Suburbanization, 1940-1960s." In From Tenements to the Taylor Homes; In Search of an Urban Housing Policy in Twentieth-Century American. John F. Bauman, Roger Biles, Kristin M. Szylvian, eds. Pp. 163-179. University Park, PA: Pennsylvania State University, 2000. Howard, Ebenezer. Garden Cities of Tomorrow. London: Swan Sonnenschein & Co., Ltd., 1902. Major Bibliographic References: Historic Inventory Report Thursday, October 28, 2010 Page 6 of 6 2010 East Elevation, Looking Southwest Photos 2010 South and East Elevations, Looking West Historic Inventory Report Thursday, October 28, 2010 Page 1 of 6 Identification Hetzel, Christopher PO Box 2316 Survey Name:Date Recorded: Field Recorder: Owner's Name:Renton Housing Authority 10/06/2010 City:Renton Classification:Building Resource Status:Comments: State:WA Zip:98056-0316 Within a District?No Contributing?No National Register: Local District: National Register District/Thematic Nomination Name: Owner Address: Survey/Inventory Not Eligible Eligibility Status: Determination Date: Determination Comments: Not Determined - SHPO 1/1/0001 Sunset Terrace Redevelopment Subarea Sunset Terrace Public Housing Complex 2612 Sunset Ln NE, Renton, WA 98056 Location Field Site No.DAHP No. Historic Name: Common Name:2612 Sunset Ln NE Property Address: Comments: King County T23R05E 09 Township/Range/EW Section 1/4 Sec 1/4 1/4 Sec MERCER ISLAND Quadrangle Tax No./Parcel No.7227801055 Plat/Block/Lot Acreage Supplemental Map(s) Coordinate Reference Projection: Datum: Easting: Northing: HARN (feet) Washington State Plane South 1224264 794614 Historic Inventory Report Thursday, October 28, 2010 Page 2 of 6 Description Narrative Historic Use:Domestic - Multiple Family House Current Use:Domestic - Multiple Family House Plan:Rectangle Stories:2 Structural System:Platform Frame Changes to Plan:Intact Changes to Interior:Unknown Changes to Original Cladding:Extensive Changes to Windows:Extensive Changes to Other:Not Applicable Other (specify): Style: Form/Type: Cladding: Foundation: Roof Type:Roof Material: Architecture/Landscape Architecture Study Unit Other Date of Construction: Architect:George W. Stoddard-Huggard & Associates Engineer: Property appears to meet criteria for the National Register of Historic Places:No Property is located in a potential historic district (National and/or local):No Property potentially contributes to a historic district (National and/or local):No Builder:Dahlgren Construction Company Veneer - Vinyl SidingModern Gable - Side Gable Asphalt / Composition - Shingle Concrete - Poured Multi-Family 1977 Remodel 1959 Built Date Historic Inventory Report Thursday, October 28, 2010 Page 3 of 6 The property has been evaluated according to the eligibility criteria for listing in the National Register of Historic Places (NRHP). Due to the many alterations, the integrity of the individual buildings and the complex as a whole is considered poor. The Sunset Terrace public housing complex resulted from federal investment in public housing during the postwar period and is associated with a well-known Seattle architect. However, it is a late example of its architectural type and its individual elements were substantially altered by rehabilitations in the 1970s and 1990s, such that they no longer appear to retain sufficient integrity to convey their historical significance. Based on our review, the property has poor integrity and does not appear eligible for listing in the NRHP individually or as a potential historic district. Stoddard’s design for Sunset Terrace appears to have been strongly influenced by the Garden City movement and exhibits features and characteristics of garden style apartments. All 27 buildings were arranged along curvilinear streets in locations to best take advantage of the original topography and create open, pleasing landscapes for residents. Throughout Sunset Terrace, each building is separated by open courtyard areas with outdoor space dedicated to individual housing units. At the rear of each unit, this space was originally identified by unit-specific metal revolving clotheslines. Additional design features included minimal ornamentation, aluminum windows, and varied exterior wall cladding of horizontal rustic cedar siding, vertical rough cedar channel siding, or resawn split cedar shake siding with some brick veneer. The Renton Housing Authority completed a comprehensive rehabilitation of Sunset Terrace in the 1970s, which resulted in the removal and replacement of many of these features. The original windows were replaced with new metal windows, unit doors were replaced, the revolving clotheslines were removed, and the original cedar wall claddings were replaced with vinyl siding. Subsequent changes occurred in the early 1990s when buildings in the complex were upgraded for ADA accessibility. Kitchens and bathrooms in the individual housing units were also substantially renovated at this time. The property was evaluated at a reconnaissance level in a cultural resources survey completed for the proposed Sunset Terrace Redevelopment Subarea in the City of Renton, King County, Washington. It is one of 27 buildings constructed by the Housing Authority of the City of Renton as part of the Sunset Terrace public housing complex authorized on June 28, 1958 and completed in 1959. Sunset Terrace consisted of a complex of 100 low-income housing units comprising both one- and two-story structures arranged along curvilinear streets. The complex was constructed by Seattle-based Dahlgren Construction Company according to designs by George W. Stoddard-Huggard & Associates. George W. Stoddard, a prominent Seattle architect and principal of the firm, is credited with the design of many well known public, private, and civic structures in the Seattle area, including such noted properties as the High School Memorial Stadium, the Green Lake Aqua Theater, and the Yesler Terrace Defense Housing Project. Stoddard retired in 1960, and the Sunset Terrace public housing complex is believed to have been one of his last commissions. Statement of Significance: Historic Inventory Report Thursday, October 28, 2010 Page 4 of 6 The property contains a one to two-story four unit apartment building constructed as part of the Sunset Terrace public housing complex in 1958-1959. Buildings in the complex were designed in one of six standard design types, each exhibiting Modern style elements. This building was constructed as a type “D” building. The building has a long rectangular plan and consists of platform frame wood construction on a poured concrete foundation. It has a very low pitch side gable roof clad with composition asphalt shingles and featuring slightly overhanging eaves with a wide fascia. Four small cylindrical, metal roof vents stand equally spaced along the roof ridge line. The exterior walls are clad with non-original horizontally applied vinyl siding. This siding replaced the building’s original resawn split cedar shake siding on the first story and rustic cedar beveled siding on the second story during rehabilitation of the building in the 1970s. The building has a west-east orientation and its primary (west) facade fronts Sunset Lane NE. The primary facade is symmetrically divided and consists of four sections, each comprising a single housing unit. The two center sections are two stories tall and the two outer sections are one story tall. On the first story, each section consists of a single door opening fit with a non-original paneled door, flanked by a wide tripartite picture window. The doors open onto poured concrete stoops connected to poured concrete sidewalks that lead to the street. On the second story, each center section is punctuated by a single, slightly shorter, tripartite picture window. The building’s rear elevation is similarly divided, each section containing a single door opening flanked by a small metal-sliding window and a tripartite picture window on the first story, and featuring a wide tripartite picture window and a small metal-sliding window on the second story. The building’s side elevations are unadorned. All of the building’s original windows were replaced with non-original metal windows in the 1970s. Other alterations to the building include the removal of original metal revolving clothes lines outside the rear entrance of each unit, and complete renovations of the building’s bathrooms and kitchens and ADA accessibility improvements in the early 1990s. Description of Physical Appearance: Historic Inventory Report Thursday, October 28, 2010 Page 5 of 6 Ochsner, Jeffery Karl, ed. Shaping Seattle Architecture: A Historical Guide to the Architects. Seattle, WA: University of Washington Press, 1998. Lord, Tom Forrester. Decent Housing: A Promise to Keep. Federal Housing Policy and its Impact on the City. Cambridge, MA: Schenkman Publishing Company, Inc., 1977. Madison, Charles A. Preface. In How the Other Half Lives. Jacob A. Riis. New York, NY: Dover Publications, Inc., 1971. __________. "Obituaries: George W. Stoddard." 29 September 1967:16. Seattle, WA. Rabinowitz, Alan. Urban Economics and Land Use in America: The Transformation of Cities in the Twentieth Century. Armonk, NY: M.E. Sharpe, Inc., 2004. The Seattle Times. "Seattle Firm Supported for Housing Job." 18 March 1959:44. Seattle, WA. Elenga, Maureen R. Seattle Architecture: A Walking Guide to Downtown. Seattle, WA: Seattle Architecture Foundation, 2007. Associated Press. "Tacoma Gets Housing Blues; To Renton It’s Not News." The Seattle Times. Seattle, WA, 29 June 1958. George W. Stoddard-Huggard & Associates. "Housing Authority of the City of Renton: Project Washington II-I, Renton Highlands, Renton, Washington." Construction Plans. Seattle, WA: George W. Stoddard- Huggard & Associates Architects & Engineers, 1958. On file with Renton Housing Authority, Renton, WA. Karolak, Eric J. "No Idea of Doing Anything Wonderful: The Labor-Crisis Origins of National Housing Policy and the Reconstruction of the Working-Class Community, 1917-1919." In From Tenemants to the Taylor Homes; In Search of an Urban Housing Policy in Twentieth-Century American. John F. Bauman, Roger Biles, Kristin M. Szylvian, eds. pp. 60-80. University Park, PA: Pennsylvania State University, 2000. Hanchett, Thomas W. "The Other 'Subsidized Housing': Federal Aid to Suburbanization, 1940-1960s." In From Tenements to the Taylor Homes; In Search of an Urban Housing Policy in Twentieth-Century American. John F. Bauman, Roger Biles, Kristin M. Szylvian, eds. Pp. 163-179. University Park, PA: Pennsylvania State University, 2000. Howard, Ebenezer. Garden Cities of Tomorrow. London: Swan Sonnenschein & Co., Ltd., 1902. Major Bibliographic References: Historic Inventory Report Thursday, October 28, 2010 Page 6 of 6 2010 North and West Elevations, Looking Southeast Photos 2612 Sunset Lane NE is in the center. East Elevation, Looking Southwest 2010 East and South Elevations, Looking North 2010 Historic Inventory Report Thursday, October 28, 2010 Page 1 of 6 Identification Hetzel, Christopher PO Box 2316 Survey Name:Date Recorded: Field Recorder: Owner's Name:Renton Housing Authority 10/06/2010 City:Renton Classification:Building Resource Status:Comments: State:WA Zip:98056-0316 Within a District?No Contributing?No National Register: Local District: National Register District/Thematic Nomination Name: Owner Address: Survey/Inventory Not Eligible Eligibility Status: Determination Date: Determination Comments: Not Determined - SHPO 1/1/0001 Sunset Terrace Redevelopment Subarea Sunset Terrace Public Housing Complex 2617 Sunset Ln NE, Renton, WA 98056 Location Field Site No.DAHP No. Historic Name: Common Name:2617 Sunset Ln NE Property Address: Comments: King County T23R05E 09 Township/Range/EW Section 1/4 Sec 1/4 1/4 Sec MERCER ISLAND Quadrangle Tax No./Parcel No.7227801055 Plat/Block/Lot Acreage Supplemental Map(s) Coordinate Reference Projection: Datum: Easting: Northing: HARN (feet) Washington State Plane South 1224177 794545 Historic Inventory Report Thursday, October 28, 2010 Page 2 of 6 Description Narrative Historic Use:Domestic - Multiple Family House Current Use:Domestic - Multiple Family House Plan:Rectangle Stories:2 Structural System:Platform Frame Changes to Plan:Intact Changes to Interior:Unknown Changes to Original Cladding:Extensive Changes to Windows:Extensive Changes to Other:Not Applicable Other (specify): Style: Form/Type: Cladding: Foundation: Roof Type:Roof Material: Architecture/Landscape Architecture Study Unit Other Date of Construction: Architect:George W. Stoddard-Huggard & Associates Engineer: Property appears to meet criteria for the National Register of Historic Places:No Property is located in a potential historic district (National and/or local):No Property potentially contributes to a historic district (National and/or local):No Builder:Dahlgren Construction Company Veneer - Vinyl SidingModern Gable - Side Gable Asphalt / Composition - Shingle Concrete - Poured Multi-Family 1977 Remodel 1959 Built Date Historic Inventory Report Thursday, October 28, 2010 Page 3 of 6 The property has been evaluated according to the eligibility criteria for listing in the National Register of Historic Places (NRHP). Due to the many alterations, the integrity of the individual buildings and the complex as a whole is considered poor. The Sunset Terrace public housing complex resulted from federal investment in public housing during the postwar period and is associated with a well-known Seattle architect. However, it is a late example of its architectural type and its individual elements were substantially altered by rehabilitations in the 1970s and 1990s, such that they no longer appear to retain sufficient integrity to convey their historical significance. Based on our review, the property has poor integrity and does not appear eligible for listing in the NRHP individually or as a potential historic district. Stoddard’s design for Sunset Terrace appears to have been strongly influenced by the Garden City movement and exhibits features and characteristics of garden style apartments. All 27 buildings were arranged along curvilinear streets in locations to best take advantage of the original topography and create open, pleasing landscapes for residents. Throughout Sunset Terrace, each building is separated by open courtyard areas with outdoor space dedicated to individual housing units. At the rear of each unit, this space was originally identified by unit-specific metal revolving clotheslines. Additional design features included minimal ornamentation, aluminum windows, and varied exterior wall cladding of horizontal rustic cedar siding, vertical rough cedar channel siding, or resawn split cedar shake siding with some brick veneer. The Renton Housing Authority completed a comprehensive rehabilitation of Sunset Terrace in the 1970s, which resulted in the removal and replacement of many of these features. The original windows were replaced with new metal windows, unit doors were replaced, the revolving clotheslines were removed, and the original cedar wall claddings were replaced with vinyl siding. Subsequent changes occurred in the early 1990s when buildings in the complex were upgraded for ADA accessibility. Kitchens and bathrooms in the individual housing units were also substantially renovated at this time. The property was evaluated at a reconnaissance level in a cultural resources survey completed for the proposed Sunset Terrace Redevelopment Subarea in the City of Renton, King County, Washington. It is one of 27 buildings constructed by the Housing Authority of the City of Renton as part of the Sunset Terrace public housing complex authorized on June 28, 1958 and completed in 1959. Sunset Terrace consisted of a complex of 100 low-income housing units comprising both one- and two-story structures arranged along curvilinear streets. The complex was constructed by Seattle-based Dahlgren Construction Company according to designs by George W. Stoddard-Huggard & Associates. George W. Stoddard, a prominent Seattle architect and principal of the firm, is credited with the design of many well known public, private, and civic structures in the Seattle area, including such noted properties as the High School Memorial Stadium, the Green Lake Aqua Theater, and the Yesler Terrace Defense Housing Project. Stoddard retired in 1960, and the Sunset Terrace public housing complex is believed to have been one of his last commissions. Statement of Significance: Historic Inventory Report Thursday, October 28, 2010 Page 4 of 6 The property contains a two-story four unit apartment building constructed as part of the Sunset Terrace public housing complex in 1958-1959. Buildings in the complex were designed in one of six standard design types, each exhibiting Modern style elements. This building was constructed as a type “E” building. The building has a long rectangular plan and consists of platform frame wood construction on a poured concrete foundation. It has a very low pitch side gable roof clad with composition asphalt shingles and featuring slightly overhanging eaves with a wide fascia. Four small cylindrical, metal roof vents stand equally spaced along the roof ridge line. The exterior walls are clad with non-original horizontally applied vinyl siding. This siding replaced the building’s original vertically applied, rough cedar channel siding during rehabilitation of the building in the 1970s. The building has a east-west orientation and its primary (east) facade fronts Sunset Lane NE. The primary facade is symmetrically divided and consists of four nearly identical sections, each comprising a single housing unit. On the first story, each section consists of a single door opening fit with a non-original paneled door, flanked by a wide tripartite picture window. Two cantilevered shed roofs extend between the sections sheltering each pair of door openings. The doors open onto poured concrete stoops connected to poured concrete sidewalks that lead to the street. On the second story, each section is punctuated by a slightly shorter, tripartite picture window. The building’s rear elevation is similarly divided, each section containing a single door opening flanked by two small windows on the first story, and featuring a wide tripartite picture window and another small window on the second story. The two center sections on the second story projects from the elevation, cantilevered over the first story. The building’s side elevations are unadorned. All of the building’s original windows were replaced with non-original metal windows in the 1970s. Other alterations to the building include the removal of original metal revolving clothes lines outside the rear entrance of each unit, and complete renovations of the building’s bathrooms and kitchens and ADA accessibility improvements in the early 1990s. Description of Physical Appearance: Historic Inventory Report Thursday, October 28, 2010 Page 5 of 6 Ochsner, Jeffery Karl, ed. Shaping Seattle Architecture: A Historical Guide to the Architects. Seattle, WA: University of Washington Press, 1998. Lord, Tom Forrester. Decent Housing: A Promise to Keep. Federal Housing Policy and its Impact on the City. Cambridge, MA: Schenkman Publishing Company, Inc., 1977. Madison, Charles A. Preface. In How the Other Half Lives. Jacob A. Riis. New York, NY: Dover Publications, Inc., 1971. __________. "Obituaries: George W. Stoddard." 29 September 1967:16. Seattle, WA. Rabinowitz, Alan. Urban Economics and Land Use in America: The Transformation of Cities in the Twentieth Century. Armonk, NY: M.E. Sharpe, Inc., 2004. The Seattle Times. "Seattle Firm Supported for Housing Job." 18 March 1959:44. Seattle, WA. Elenga, Maureen R. Seattle Architecture: A Walking Guide to Downtown. Seattle, WA: Seattle Architecture Foundation, 2007. Associated Press. "Tacoma Gets Housing Blues; To Renton It’s Not News." The Seattle Times. Seattle, WA, 29 June 1958. George W. Stoddard-Huggard & Associates. "Housing Authority of the City of Renton: Project Washington II-I, Renton Highlands, Renton, Washington." Construction Plans. Seattle, WA: George W. Stoddard- Huggard & Associates Architects & Engineers, 1958. On file with Renton Housing Authority, Renton, WA. Karolak, Eric J. "No Idea of Doing Anything Wonderful: The Labor-Crisis Origins of National Housing Policy and the Reconstruction of the Working-Class Community, 1917-1919." In From Tenemants to the Taylor Homes; In Search of an Urban Housing Policy in Twentieth-Century American. John F. Bauman, Roger Biles, Kristin M. Szylvian, eds. pp. 60-80. University Park, PA: Pennsylvania State University, 2000. Hanchett, Thomas W. "The Other 'Subsidized Housing': Federal Aid to Suburbanization, 1940-1960s." In From Tenements to the Taylor Homes; In Search of an Urban Housing Policy in Twentieth-Century American. John F. Bauman, Roger Biles, Kristin M. Szylvian, eds. Pp. 163-179. University Park, PA: Pennsylvania State University, 2000. Howard, Ebenezer. Garden Cities of Tomorrow. London: Swan Sonnenschein & Co., Ltd., 1902. Major Bibliographic References: Historic Inventory Report Thursday, October 28, 2010 Page 6 of 6 2010 Northeast Elevation, Looking Southwest Photos 2010 Southeast and Northeast Elevations, Looking West Historic Inventory Report Thursday, October 28, 2010 Page 1 of 6 Identification Hetzel, Christopher PO Box 2316 Survey Name:Date Recorded: Field Recorder: Owner's Name:Renton Housing Authority 10/06/2010 City:Renton Classification:Building Resource Status:Comments: State:WA Zip:98056-0316 Within a District?No Contributing?No National Register: Local District: National Register District/Thematic Nomination Name: Owner Address: Survey/Inventory Not Eligible Eligibility Status: Determination Date: Determination Comments: Not Determined - SHPO 1/1/0001 Sunset Terrace Redevelopment Subarea Sunset Terrace Public Housing Complex 2620 Sunset Ln NE, Renton, WA 98056 Location Field Site No.DAHP No. Historic Name: Common Name:2620 Sunset Ln NE Property Address: Comments: King County T23R05E 09 Township/Range/EW Section 1/4 Sec 1/4 1/4 Sec RENTON Quadrangle Tax No./Parcel No.7227801055 Plat/Block/Lot Acreage Supplemental Map(s) Coordinate Reference Projection: Datum: Easting: Northing: HARN (feet) Washington State Plane South 1224337 794552 Historic Inventory Report Thursday, October 28, 2010 Page 2 of 6 Description Narrative Historic Use:Domestic - Multiple Family House Current Use:Domestic - Multiple Family House Plan:Rectangle Stories:2 Structural System:Platform Frame Changes to Plan:Intact Changes to Interior:Unknown Changes to Original Cladding:Extensive Changes to Windows:Extensive Changes to Other:Not Applicable Other (specify): Style: Form/Type: Cladding: Foundation: Roof Type:Roof Material: Architecture/Landscape Architecture Study Unit Other Date of Construction: Architect:George W. Stoddard-Huggard & Associates Engineer: Property appears to meet criteria for the National Register of Historic Places:No Property is located in a potential historic district (National and/or local):No Property potentially contributes to a historic district (National and/or local):No Builder:Dahlgren Construction Company Veneer - Brick Veneer - Vinyl SidingModern Gable - Side Gable Asphalt / Composition - Shingle Concrete - Poured Multi-Family 1977 Remodel 1959 Built Date Historic Inventory Report Thursday, October 28, 2010 Page 3 of 6 The property has been evaluated according to the eligibility criteria for listing in the National Register of Historic Places (NRHP). Due to the many alterations, the integrity of the individual buildings and the complex as a whole is considered poor. The Sunset Terrace public housing complex resulted from federal investment in public housing during the postwar period and is associated with a well-known Seattle architect. However, it is a late example of its architectural type and its individual elements were substantially altered by rehabilitations in the 1970s and 1990s, such that they no longer appear to retain sufficient integrity to convey their historical significance. Based on our review, the property has poor integrity and does not appear eligible for listing in the NRHP individually or as a potential historic district. Stoddard’s design for Sunset Terrace appears to have been strongly influenced by the Garden City movement and exhibits features and characteristics of garden style apartments. All 27 buildings were arranged along curvilinear streets in locations to best take advantage of the original topography and create open, pleasing landscapes for residents. Throughout Sunset Terrace, each building is separated by open courtyard areas with outdoor space dedicated to individual housing units. At the rear of each unit, this space was originally identified by unit-specific metal revolving clotheslines. Additional design features included minimal ornamentation, aluminum windows, and varied exterior wall cladding of horizontal rustic cedar siding, vertical rough cedar channel siding, or resawn split cedar shake siding with some brick veneer. The Renton Housing Authority completed a comprehensive rehabilitation of Sunset Terrace in the 1970s, which resulted in the removal and replacement of many of these features. The original windows were replaced with new metal windows, unit doors were replaced, the revolving clotheslines were removed, and the original cedar wall claddings were replaced with vinyl siding. Subsequent changes occurred in the early 1990s when buildings in the complex were upgraded for ADA accessibility. Kitchens and bathrooms in the individual housing units were also substantially renovated at this time. The property was evaluated at a reconnaissance level in a cultural resources survey completed for the proposed Sunset Terrace Redevelopment Subarea in the City of Renton, King County, Washington. It is one of 27 buildings constructed by the Housing Authority of the City of Renton as part of the Sunset Terrace public housing complex authorized on June 28, 1958 and completed in 1959. Sunset Terrace consisted of a complex of 100 low-income housing units comprising both one- and two-story structures arranged along curvilinear streets. The complex was constructed by Seattle-based Dahlgren Construction Company according to designs by George W. Stoddard-Huggard & Associates. George W. Stoddard, a prominent Seattle architect and principal of the firm, is credited with the design of many well known public, private, and civic structures in the Seattle area, including such noted properties as the High School Memorial Stadium, the Green Lake Aqua Theater, and the Yesler Terrace Defense Housing Project. Stoddard retired in 1960, and the Sunset Terrace public housing complex is believed to have been one of his last commissions. Statement of Significance: Historic Inventory Report Thursday, October 28, 2010 Page 4 of 6 The property contains a two-story four unit apartment building constructed as part of the Sunset Terrace public housing complex in 1958-1959. Buildings in the complex were designed in one of six standard design types, each exhibiting Modern style elements. This building was constructed as a type “F” building. The building has a long rectangular plan and consists of platform frame wood construction on a poured concrete foundation. It has a very low pitch side gable roof clad with composition asphalt shingles and featuring slightly overhanging eaves with a wide fascia. Four small cylindrical, metal roof vents stand equally spaced along the roof ridge line. The exterior walls are clad with non-original horizontally applied vinyl siding. This siding replaced the building’s original vertically applied rough cedar channel siding on the first story and resawn split shake siding on the second story during rehabilitation of the building in the 1970s. The building has a southeast-northwest orientation and its primary (southeast) facade forms a landscaped courtyard between another building to the southeast. The primary facade is symmetrically divided and consists of four nearly identical sections, each comprising a single housing unit. On the first story, each section consists of a single door opening fit with a non-original paneled door, flanked by a wide tripartite picture window. Two cantilevered shed roofs extend between the sections sheltering each pair of door openings. The doors open onto poured concrete stoops connected to poured concrete sidewalks that lead to the street. On the second story, each section is punctuated by two slightly shorter, tripartite picture windows. The building’s rear elevation is similarly divided, each section containing a single door opening flanked by small metal-sliding windows on the first story, and featuring a wide tripartite picture window and a small metal-sliding window on the second story. The entire second story projects from the elevation, and the rear entrances are sheltered by cantilevered shed roofs. The building’s side elevations are clad with brick, but are otherwise unadorned. All of the building’s original windows were replaced with non-original metal windows in the 1970s. Other alterations to the building include the removal of original metal revolving clothes lines outside the rear entrance of each unit, and complete renovations of the building’s bathrooms and kitchens and ADA accessibility improvements in the early 1990s. Description of Physical Appearance: Historic Inventory Report Thursday, October 28, 2010 Page 5 of 6 Ochsner, Jeffery Karl, ed. Shaping Seattle Architecture: A Historical Guide to the Architects. Seattle, WA: University of Washington Press, 1998. Lord, Tom Forrester. Decent Housing: A Promise to Keep. Federal Housing Policy and its Impact on the City. Cambridge, MA: Schenkman Publishing Company, Inc., 1977. Madison, Charles A. Preface. In How the Other Half Lives. Jacob A. Riis. New York, NY: Dover Publications, Inc., 1971. __________. "Obituaries: George W. Stoddard." 29 September 1967:16. Seattle, WA. Rabinowitz, Alan. Urban Economics and Land Use in America: The Transformation of Cities in the Twentieth Century. Armonk, NY: M.E. Sharpe, Inc., 2004. The Seattle Times. "Seattle Firm Supported for Housing Job." 18 March 1959:44. Seattle, WA. Elenga, Maureen R. Seattle Architecture: A Walking Guide to Downtown. Seattle, WA: Seattle Architecture Foundation, 2007. Associated Press. "Tacoma Gets Housing Blues; To Renton It’s Not News." The Seattle Times. Seattle, WA, 29 June 1958. George W. Stoddard-Huggard & Associates. "Housing Authority of the City of Renton: Project Washington II-I, Renton Highlands, Renton, Washington." Construction Plans. Seattle, WA: George W. Stoddard- Huggard & Associates Architects & Engineers, 1958. On file with Renton Housing Authority, Renton, WA. Karolak, Eric J. "No Idea of Doing Anything Wonderful: The Labor-Crisis Origins of National Housing Policy and the Reconstruction of the Working-Class Community, 1917-1919." In From Tenemants to the Taylor Homes; In Search of an Urban Housing Policy in Twentieth-Century American. John F. Bauman, Roger Biles, Kristin M. Szylvian, eds. pp. 60-80. University Park, PA: Pennsylvania State University, 2000. Hanchett, Thomas W. "The Other 'Subsidized Housing': Federal Aid to Suburbanization, 1940-1960s." In From Tenements to the Taylor Homes; In Search of an Urban Housing Policy in Twentieth-Century American. John F. Bauman, Roger Biles, Kristin M. Szylvian, eds. Pp. 163-179. University Park, PA: Pennsylvania State University, 2000. Howard, Ebenezer. Garden Cities of Tomorrow. London: Swan Sonnenschein & Co., Ltd., 1902. Major Bibliographic References: Historic Inventory Report Thursday, October 28, 2010 Page 6 of 6 2620 Sunset Lane NE is in the center. East and South Elevations, Looking West 2010 North Elevation, Looking East 2010 Photos West and South Elevations, Looking North 2010 South Elevation, Looking North 2010 Historic Inventory Report Thursday, October 28, 2010 Page 1 of 6 Identification Hetzel, Christopher PO Box 2316 Survey Name:Date Recorded: Field Recorder: Owner's Name:Renton Housing Authority 10/06/2010 City:Renton Classification:Building Resource Status:Comments: State:WA Zip:98056-0316 Within a District?No Contributing?No National Register: Local District: National Register District/Thematic Nomination Name: Owner Address: Survey/Inventory Not Eligible Eligibility Status: Determination Date: Determination Comments: Not Determined - SHPO 1/1/0001 Sunset Terrace Redevelopment Subarea Sunset Terrace Public Housing Complex 2623 Sunset Ln NE, Renton, WA 98056 Location Field Site No.DAHP No. Historic Name: Common Name:2623 Sunset Ln NE Property Address: Comments: King County T23R05E 09 Township/Range/EW Section 1/4 Sec 1/4 1/4 Sec RENTON Quadrangle Tax No./Parcel No.7227801055 Plat/Block/Lot Acreage Supplemental Map(s) Coordinate Reference Projection: Datum: Easting: Northing: HARN (feet) Washington State Plane South 1224232 794448 Historic Inventory Report Thursday, October 28, 2010 Page 2 of 6 Description Narrative Historic Use:Domestic - Multiple Family House Current Use:Domestic - Multiple Family House Plan:Rectangle Stories:2 Structural System:Platform Frame Changes to Plan:Intact Changes to Interior:Unknown Changes to Original Cladding:Extensive Changes to Windows:Extensive Changes to Other:Not Applicable Other (specify): Style: Form/Type: Cladding: Foundation: Roof Type:Roof Material: Architecture/Landscape Architecture Study Unit Other Date of Construction: Architect:George W. Stoddard-Huggard & Associates Engineer: Property appears to meet criteria for the National Register of Historic Places:No Property is located in a potential historic district (National and/or local):No Property potentially contributes to a historic district (National and/or local):No Builder:Dahlgren Construction Company Veneer - Vinyl SidingModern Gable - Side Gable Asphalt / Composition - Shingle Concrete - Poured Multi-Family 1977 Remodel 1959 Built Date Historic Inventory Report Thursday, October 28, 2010 Page 3 of 6 The property has been evaluated according to the eligibility criteria for listing in the National Register of Historic Places (NRHP). Due to the many alterations, the integrity of the individual buildings and the complex as a whole is considered poor. The Sunset Terrace public housing complex resulted from federal investment in public housing during the postwar period and is associated with a well-known Seattle architect. However, it is a late example of its architectural type and its individual elements were substantially altered by rehabilitations in the 1970s and 1990s, such that they no longer appear to retain sufficient integrity to convey their historical significance. Based on our review, the property has poor integrity and does not appear eligible for listing in the NRHP individually or as a potential historic district. Stoddard’s design for Sunset Terrace appears to have been strongly influenced by the Garden City movement and exhibits features and characteristics of garden style apartments. All 27 buildings were arranged along curvilinear streets in locations to best take advantage of the original topography and create open, pleasing landscapes for residents. Throughout Sunset Terrace, each building is separated by open courtyard areas with outdoor space dedicated to individual housing units. At the rear of each unit, this space was originally identified by unit-specific metal revolving clotheslines. Additional design features included minimal ornamentation, aluminum windows, and varied exterior wall cladding of horizontal rustic cedar siding, vertical rough cedar channel siding, or resawn split cedar shake siding with some brick veneer. The Renton Housing Authority completed a comprehensive rehabilitation of Sunset Terrace in the 1970s, which resulted in the removal and replacement of many of these features. The original windows were replaced with new metal windows, unit doors were replaced, the revolving clotheslines were removed, and the original cedar wall claddings were replaced with vinyl siding. Subsequent changes occurred in the early 1990s when buildings in the complex were upgraded for ADA accessibility. Kitchens and bathrooms in the individual housing units were also substantially renovated at this time. The property was evaluated at a reconnaissance level in a cultural resources survey completed for the proposed Sunset Terrace Redevelopment Subarea in the City of Renton, King County, Washington. It is one of 27 buildings constructed by the Housing Authority of the City of Renton as part of the Sunset Terrace public housing complex authorized on June 28, 1958 and completed in 1959. Sunset Terrace consisted of a complex of 100 low-income housing units comprising both one- and two-story structures arranged along curvilinear streets. The complex was constructed by Seattle-based Dahlgren Construction Company according to designs by George W. Stoddard-Huggard & Associates. George W. Stoddard, a prominent Seattle architect and principal of the firm, is credited with the design of many well known public, private, and civic structures in the Seattle area, including such noted properties as the High School Memorial Stadium, the Green Lake Aqua Theater, and the Yesler Terrace Defense Housing Project. Stoddard retired in 1960, and the Sunset Terrace public housing complex is believed to have been one of his last commissions. Statement of Significance: Historic Inventory Report Thursday, October 28, 2010 Page 4 of 6 The property contains a two-story four unit apartment building constructed as part of the Sunset Terrace public housing complex in 1958-1959. Buildings in the complex were designed in one of six standard design types, each exhibiting Modern style elements. This building was constructed as a type “E” building. The building has a long rectangular plan and consists of platform frame wood construction on a poured concrete foundation. It has a very low pitch side gable roof clad with composition asphalt shingles and featuring slightly overhanging eaves with a wide fascia. Four small cylindrical, metal roof vents stand equally spaced along the roof ridge line. The exterior walls are clad with non-original horizontally applied vinyl siding. This siding replaced the building’s original horizontally applied, rustic cedar beveled siding during rehabilitation of the building in the 1970s. The building has a east-west orientation and its primary (east) facade fronts Sunset Lane NE. The primary facade is symmetrically divided and consists of four nearly identical sections, each comprising a single housing unit. On the first story, each section consists of a single door opening fit with a non-original paneled door, flanked by a wide tripartite picture window. Two cantilevered shed roofs extend between the sections sheltering each pair of door openings. The doors open onto poured concrete stoops connected to poured concrete sidewalks that lead to the street. On the second story, each section is punctuated by a slightly shorter, tripartite picture window. The building’s rear elevation is similarly divided, each section containing a single door opening flanked by two small windows on the first story, and featuring a wide tripartite picture window and another small window on the second story. The two center sections on the second story projects from the elevation, cantilevered over the first story. The building’s side elevations are unadorned. All of the building’s original windows were replaced with non-original metal windows in the 1970s. Other alterations to the building include the removal of original metal revolving clothes lines outside the rear entrance of each unit, and complete renovations of the building’s bathrooms and kitchens and ADA accessibility improvements in the early 1990s. Description of Physical Appearance: Historic Inventory Report Thursday, October 28, 2010 Page 5 of 6 Ochsner, Jeffery Karl, ed. Shaping Seattle Architecture: A Historical Guide to the Architects. Seattle, WA: University of Washington Press, 1998. Lord, Tom Forrester. Decent Housing: A Promise to Keep. Federal Housing Policy and its Impact on the City. Cambridge, MA: Schenkman Publishing Company, Inc., 1977. Madison, Charles A. Preface. In How the Other Half Lives. Jacob A. Riis. New York, NY: Dover Publications, Inc., 1971. __________. "Obituaries: George W. Stoddard." 29 September 1967:16. Seattle, WA. Rabinowitz, Alan. Urban Economics and Land Use in America: The Transformation of Cities in the Twentieth Century. Armonk, NY: M.E. Sharpe, Inc., 2004. The Seattle Times. "Seattle Firm Supported for Housing Job." 18 March 1959:44. Seattle, WA. Elenga, Maureen R. Seattle Architecture: A Walking Guide to Downtown. Seattle, WA: Seattle Architecture Foundation, 2007. Associated Press. "Tacoma Gets Housing Blues; To Renton It’s Not News." The Seattle Times. Seattle, WA, 29 June 1958. George W. Stoddard-Huggard & Associates. "Housing Authority of the City of Renton: Project Washington II-I, Renton Highlands, Renton, Washington." Construction Plans. Seattle, WA: George W. Stoddard- Huggard & Associates Architects & Engineers, 1958. On file with Renton Housing Authority, Renton, WA. Karolak, Eric J. "No Idea of Doing Anything Wonderful: The Labor-Crisis Origins of National Housing Policy and the Reconstruction of the Working-Class Community, 1917-1919." In From Tenemants to the Taylor Homes; In Search of an Urban Housing Policy in Twentieth-Century American. John F. Bauman, Roger Biles, Kristin M. Szylvian, eds. pp. 60-80. University Park, PA: Pennsylvania State University, 2000. Hanchett, Thomas W. "The Other 'Subsidized Housing': Federal Aid to Suburbanization, 1940-1960s." In From Tenements to the Taylor Homes; In Search of an Urban Housing Policy in Twentieth-Century American. John F. Bauman, Roger Biles, Kristin M. Szylvian, eds. Pp. 163-179. University Park, PA: Pennsylvania State University, 2000. Howard, Ebenezer. Garden Cities of Tomorrow. London: Swan Sonnenschein & Co., Ltd., 1902. Major Bibliographic References: Historic Inventory Report Thursday, October 28, 2010 Page 6 of 6 2010 South and East Elevations, Looking Northwest Photos 2010 East Elevation, Looking West Historic Inventory Report Thursday, October 28, 2010 Page 1 of 6 Identification Hetzel, Christopher PO Box 2316 Survey Name:Date Recorded: Field Recorder: Owner's Name:Renton Housing Authority 10/06/2010 City:Renton Classification:Building Resource Status:Comments: State:WA Zip:98056-0316 Within a District?No Contributing?No National Register: Local District: National Register District/Thematic Nomination Name: Owner Address: Survey/Inventory Not Eligible Eligibility Status: Determination Date: Determination Comments: Not Determined - SHPO 1/1/0001 Sunset Terrace Redevelopment Subarea Sunset Terrace Public Housing Complex 2629 Sunset Ln NE, Renton, WA 98056 Location Field Site No.DAHP No. Historic Name: Common Name:2629 Sunset Ln NE Property Address: Comments: King County T23R05E 09 Township/Range/EW Section 1/4 Sec 1/4 1/4 Sec RENTON Quadrangle Tax No./Parcel No.7227801055 Plat/Block/Lot Acreage Supplemental Map(s) Coordinate Reference Projection: Datum: Easting: Northing: HARN (feet) Washington State Plane South 1224261 794361 Historic Inventory Report Thursday, October 28, 2010 Page 2 of 6 Description Narrative Historic Use:Domestic - Multiple Family House Current Use:Domestic - Multiple Family House Plan:Rectangle Stories:2 Structural System:Platform Frame Changes to Plan:Intact Changes to Interior:Unknown Changes to Original Cladding:Extensive Changes to Windows:Extensive Changes to Other:Not Applicable Other (specify): Style: Form/Type: Cladding: Foundation: Roof Type:Roof Material: Architecture/Landscape Architecture Study Unit Other Date of Construction: Architect:George W. Stoddard-Huggard & Associates Engineer: Property appears to meet criteria for the National Register of Historic Places:No Property is located in a potential historic district (National and/or local):No Property potentially contributes to a historic district (National and/or local):No Builder:Dahlgren Construction Company Veneer - Vinyl SidingModern Gable - Side Gable Asphalt / Composition - Shingle Concrete - Poured Multi-Family 1977 Remodel 1959 Built Date Historic Inventory Report Thursday, October 28, 2010 Page 3 of 6 The property has been evaluated according to the eligibility criteria for listing in the National Register of Historic Places (NRHP). Due to the many alterations, the integrity of the individual buildings and the complex as a whole is considered poor. The Sunset Terrace public housing complex resulted from federal investment in public housing during the postwar period and is associated with a well-known Seattle architect. However, it is a late example of its architectural type and its individual elements were substantially altered by rehabilitations in the 1970s and 1990s, such that they no longer appear to retain sufficient integrity to convey their historical significance. Based on our review, the property has poor integrity and does not appear eligible for listing in the NRHP individually or as a potential historic district. Stoddard’s design for Sunset Terrace appears to have been strongly influenced by the Garden City movement and exhibits features and characteristics of garden style apartments. All 27 buildings were arranged along curvilinear streets in locations to best take advantage of the original topography and create open, pleasing landscapes for residents. Throughout Sunset Terrace, each building is separated by open courtyard areas with outdoor space dedicated to individual housing units. At the rear of each unit, this space was originally identified by unit-specific metal revolving clotheslines. Additional design features included minimal ornamentation, aluminum windows, and varied exterior wall cladding of horizontal rustic cedar siding, vertical rough cedar channel siding, or resawn split cedar shake siding with some brick veneer. The Renton Housing Authority completed a comprehensive rehabilitation of Sunset Terrace in the 1970s, which resulted in the removal and replacement of many of these features. The original windows were replaced with new metal windows, unit doors were replaced, the revolving clotheslines were removed, and the original cedar wall claddings were replaced with vinyl siding. Subsequent changes occurred in the early 1990s when buildings in the complex were upgraded for ADA accessibility. Kitchens and bathrooms in the individual housing units were also substantially renovated at this time. The property was evaluated at a reconnaissance level in a cultural resources survey completed for the proposed Sunset Terrace Redevelopment Subarea in the City of Renton, King County, Washington. It is one of 27 buildings constructed by the Housing Authority of the City of Renton as part of the Sunset Terrace public housing complex authorized on June 28, 1958 and completed in 1959. Sunset Terrace consisted of a complex of 100 low-income housing units comprising both one- and two-story structures arranged along curvilinear streets. The complex was constructed by Seattle-based Dahlgren Construction Company according to designs by George W. Stoddard-Huggard & Associates. George W. Stoddard, a prominent Seattle architect and principal of the firm, is credited with the design of many well known public, private, and civic structures in the Seattle area, including such noted properties as the High School Memorial Stadium, the Green Lake Aqua Theater, and the Yesler Terrace Defense Housing Project. Stoddard retired in 1960, and the Sunset Terrace public housing complex is believed to have been one of his last commissions. Statement of Significance: Historic Inventory Report Thursday, October 28, 2010 Page 4 of 6 The property contains a two-story four unit apartment building constructed as part of the Sunset Terrace public housing complex in 1958-1959. Buildings in the complex were designed in one of six standard design types, each exhibiting Modern style elements. This building was constructed as a type “E” building. The building has a long rectangular plan and consists of platform frame wood construction on a poured concrete foundation. It has a very low pitch side gable roof clad with composition asphalt shingles and featuring slightly overhanging eaves with a wide fascia. Four small cylindrical, metal roof vents stand equally spaced along the roof ridge line. The exterior walls are clad with non-original horizontally applied vinyl siding. This siding replaced the building’s original resawn split cedar shake siding on the first story and vertically applied rough cedar channel siding on the second story during rehabilitation of the building in the 1970s. The building has a southeast-northwest orientation and its primary (southeast) facade forms a landscaped courtyard between another building to the southeast. The primary facade is symmetrically divided and consists of four nearly identical sections, each comprising a single housing unit. On the first story, each section consists of a single door opening fit with a non-original paneled door, flanked by a wide tripartite picture window. Two cantilevered shed roofs extend between the sections sheltering each pair of door openings. The doors open onto poured concrete stoops connected to poured concrete sidewalks that lead to the street. On the second story, each section is punctuated by a slightly shorter, tripartite picture window. The building’s rear elevation is similarly divided, each section containing a single door opening flanked by two small windows on the first story, and featuring a wide tripartite picture window and another small window on the second story. The two center sections on the second story projects from the elevation, cantilevered over the first story. The building’s side elevations are unadorned. All of the building’s original windows were replaced with non-original metal windows in the 1970s. Other alterations to the building include the removal of original metal revolving clothes lines outside the rear entrance of each unit, and complete renovations of the building’s bathrooms and kitchens and ADA accessibility improvements in the early 1990s. Description of Physical Appearance: Historic Inventory Report Thursday, October 28, 2010 Page 5 of 6 Ochsner, Jeffery Karl, ed. Shaping Seattle Architecture: A Historical Guide to the Architects. Seattle, WA: University of Washington Press, 1998. Lord, Tom Forrester. Decent Housing: A Promise to Keep. Federal Housing Policy and its Impact on the City. Cambridge, MA: Schenkman Publishing Company, Inc., 1977. Madison, Charles A. Preface. In How the Other Half Lives. Jacob A. Riis. New York, NY: Dover Publications, Inc., 1971. __________. "Obituaries: George W. Stoddard." 29 September 1967:16. Seattle, WA. Rabinowitz, Alan. Urban Economics and Land Use in America: The Transformation of Cities in the Twentieth Century. Armonk, NY: M.E. Sharpe, Inc., 2004. The Seattle Times. "Seattle Firm Supported for Housing Job." 18 March 1959:44. Seattle, WA. Elenga, Maureen R. Seattle Architecture: A Walking Guide to Downtown. Seattle, WA: Seattle Architecture Foundation, 2007. Associated Press. "Tacoma Gets Housing Blues; To Renton It’s Not News." The Seattle Times. Seattle, WA, 29 June 1958. George W. Stoddard-Huggard & Associates. "Housing Authority of the City of Renton: Project Washington II-I, Renton Highlands, Renton, Washington." Construction Plans. Seattle, WA: George W. Stoddard- Huggard & Associates Architects & Engineers, 1958. On file with Renton Housing Authority, Renton, WA. Karolak, Eric J. "No Idea of Doing Anything Wonderful: The Labor-Crisis Origins of National Housing Policy and the Reconstruction of the Working-Class Community, 1917-1919." In From Tenemants to the Taylor Homes; In Search of an Urban Housing Policy in Twentieth-Century American. John F. Bauman, Roger Biles, Kristin M. Szylvian, eds. pp. 60-80. University Park, PA: Pennsylvania State University, 2000. Hanchett, Thomas W. "The Other 'Subsidized Housing': Federal Aid to Suburbanization, 1940-1960s." In From Tenements to the Taylor Homes; In Search of an Urban Housing Policy in Twentieth-Century American. John F. Bauman, Roger Biles, Kristin M. Szylvian, eds. Pp. 163-179. University Park, PA: Pennsylvania State University, 2000. Howard, Ebenezer. Garden Cities of Tomorrow. London: Swan Sonnenschein & Co., Ltd., 1902. Major Bibliographic References: Historic Inventory Report Thursday, October 28, 2010 Page 6 of 6 2010 North and East Elevations, Looking Southwest Photos East Elevation, Looking West 2010 South and Easat Elevations, Looking Northwest 2010 Historic Inventory Report Thursday, October 28, 2010 Page 1 of 6 Identification Hetzel, Christopher PO Box 2316 Survey Name:Date Recorded: Field Recorder: Owner's Name:Renton Housing Authority 10/06/2010 City:Renton Classification:Building Resource Status:Comments: State:WA Zip:98056-0316 Within a District?No Contributing?No National Register: Local District: National Register District/Thematic Nomination Name: Owner Address: Survey/Inventory Not Eligible Eligibility Status: Determination Date: Determination Comments: Not Determined - SHPO 1/1/0001 Sunset Terrace Redevelopment Subarea Sunset Terrace Public Housing Complex 2630 Sunset Ln NE, Renton, WA 98056 Location Field Site No.DAHP No. Historic Name: Common Name:2630 Sunset Ln NE Property Address: Comments: King County T23R05E 09 Township/Range/EW Section 1/4 Sec 1/4 1/4 Sec RENTON Quadrangle Tax No./Parcel No.7227801055 Plat/Block/Lot Acreage Supplemental Map(s) Coordinate Reference Projection: Datum: Easting: Northing: HARN (feet) Washington State Plane South 1224379 794481 Historic Inventory Report Thursday, October 28, 2010 Page 2 of 6 Description Narrative Historic Use:Domestic - Multiple Family House Current Use:Domestic - Multiple Family House Plan:Rectangle Stories:2 Structural System:Platform Frame Changes to Plan:Intact Changes to Interior:Unknown Changes to Original Cladding:Extensive Changes to Windows:Extensive Changes to Other:Not Applicable Other (specify): Style: Form/Type: Cladding: Foundation: Roof Type:Roof Material: Architecture/Landscape Architecture Study Unit Other Date of Construction: Architect:George W. Stoddard-Huggard & Associates Engineer: Property appears to meet criteria for the National Register of Historic Places:No Property is located in a potential historic district (National and/or local):No Property potentially contributes to a historic district (National and/or local):No Builder:Dahlgren Construction Company Veneer - Vinyl Siding Veneer - BrickModern Gable - Side Gable Asphalt / Composition - Shingle Concrete - Poured Multi-Family 1977 Remodel 1959 Built Date Historic Inventory Report Thursday, October 28, 2010 Page 3 of 6 The property has been evaluated according to the eligibility criteria for listing in the National Register of Historic Places (NRHP). Due to the many alterations, the integrity of the individual buildings and the complex as a whole is considered poor. The Sunset Terrace public housing complex resulted from federal investment in public housing during the postwar period and is associated with a well-known Seattle architect. However, it is a late example of its architectural type and its individual elements were substantially altered by rehabilitations in the 1970s and 1990s, such that they no longer appear to retain sufficient integrity to convey their historical significance. Based on our review, the property has poor integrity and does not appear eligible for listing in the NRHP individually or as a potential historic district. Stoddard’s design for Sunset Terrace appears to have been strongly influenced by the Garden City movement and exhibits features and characteristics of garden style apartments. All 27 buildings were arranged along curvilinear streets in locations to best take advantage of the original topography and create open, pleasing landscapes for residents. Throughout Sunset Terrace, each building is separated by open courtyard areas with outdoor space dedicated to individual housing units. At the rear of each unit, this space was originally identified by unit-specific metal revolving clotheslines. Additional design features included minimal ornamentation, aluminum windows, and varied exterior wall cladding of horizontal rustic cedar siding, vertical rough cedar channel siding, or resawn split cedar shake siding with some brick veneer. The Renton Housing Authority completed a comprehensive rehabilitation of Sunset Terrace in the 1970s, which resulted in the removal and replacement of many of these features. The original windows were replaced with new metal windows, unit doors were replaced, the revolving clotheslines were removed, and the original cedar wall claddings were replaced with vinyl siding. Subsequent changes occurred in the early 1990s when buildings in the complex were upgraded for ADA accessibility. Kitchens and bathrooms in the individual housing units were also substantially renovated at this time. The property was evaluated at a reconnaissance level in a cultural resources survey completed for the proposed Sunset Terrace Redevelopment Subarea in the City of Renton, King County, Washington. It is one of 27 buildings constructed by the Housing Authority of the City of Renton as part of the Sunset Terrace public housing complex authorized on June 28, 1958 and completed in 1959. Sunset Terrace consisted of a complex of 100 low-income housing units comprising both one- and two-story structures arranged along curvilinear streets. The complex was constructed by Seattle-based Dahlgren Construction Company according to designs by George W. Stoddard-Huggard & Associates. George W. Stoddard, a prominent Seattle architect and principal of the firm, is credited with the design of many well known public, private, and civic structures in the Seattle area, including such noted properties as the High School Memorial Stadium, the Green Lake Aqua Theater, and the Yesler Terrace Defense Housing Project. Stoddard retired in 1960, and the Sunset Terrace public housing complex is believed to have been one of his last commissions. Statement of Significance: Historic Inventory Report Thursday, October 28, 2010 Page 4 of 6 The property contains a two-story four unit apartment building constructed as part of the Sunset Terrace public housing complex in 1958-1959. Buildings in the complex were designed in one of six standard design types, each exhibiting Modern style elements. This building was constructed as a type “F” building. The building has a long rectangular plan and consists of platform frame wood construction on a poured concrete foundation. It has a very low pitch side gable roof clad with composition asphalt shingles and featuring slightly overhanging eaves with a wide fascia. Four small cylindrical, metal roof vents stand equally spaced along the roof ridge line. The exterior walls are clad with non-original horizontally applied vinyl siding. This siding replaced the building’s original vertically applied rough cedar channel siding on the first story and resawn split shake siding on the second story during rehabilitation of the building in the 1970s. The building has a northwest-southeast orientation and its primary (northwest) facade forms a landscaped courtyard between another building to the north. The primary facade is symmetrically divided and consists of four nearly identical sections, each comprising a single housing unit. On the first story, each section consists of a single door opening fit with a non-original paneled door, flanked by a wide tripartite picture window. Two cantilevered shed roofs extend between the sections sheltering each pair of door openings. The doors open onto poured concrete stoops connected to poured concrete sidewalks that lead to the street. On the second story, each section is punctuated by two slightly shorter, tripartite picture windows. The building’s rear elevation is similarly divided, each section containing a single door opening flanked by small metal-sliding windows on the first story, and featuring a wide tripartite picture window and a small metal-sliding window on the second story. The entire second story projects from the elevation, and the rear entrances are sheltered by cantilevered shed roofs. The building’s side elevations are clad with brick, but are otherwise unadorned. All of the building’s original windows were replaced with non-original metal windows in the 1970s. Other alterations to the building include the removal of original metal revolving clothes lines outside the rear entrance of each unit, and complete renovations of the building’s bathrooms and kitchens and ADA accessibility improvements in the early 1990s. Description of Physical Appearance: Historic Inventory Report Thursday, October 28, 2010 Page 5 of 6 Ochsner, Jeffery Karl, ed. Shaping Seattle Architecture: A Historical Guide to the Architects. Seattle, WA: University of Washington Press, 1998. Lord, Tom Forrester. Decent Housing: A Promise to Keep. Federal Housing Policy and its Impact on the City. Cambridge, MA: Schenkman Publishing Company, Inc., 1977. Madison, Charles A. Preface. In How the Other Half Lives. Jacob A. Riis. New York, NY: Dover Publications, Inc., 1971. __________. "Obituaries: George W. Stoddard." 29 September 1967:16. Seattle, WA. Rabinowitz, Alan. Urban Economics and Land Use in America: The Transformation of Cities in the Twentieth Century. Armonk, NY: M.E. Sharpe, Inc., 2004. The Seattle Times. "Seattle Firm Supported for Housing Job." 18 March 1959:44. Seattle, WA. Elenga, Maureen R. Seattle Architecture: A Walking Guide to Downtown. Seattle, WA: Seattle Architecture Foundation, 2007. Associated Press. "Tacoma Gets Housing Blues; To Renton It’s Not News." The Seattle Times. Seattle, WA, 29 June 1958. George W. Stoddard-Huggard & Associates. "Housing Authority of the City of Renton: Project Washington II-I, Renton Highlands, Renton, Washington." Construction Plans. Seattle, WA: George W. Stoddard- Huggard & Associates Architects & Engineers, 1958. On file with Renton Housing Authority, Renton, WA. Karolak, Eric J. "No Idea of Doing Anything Wonderful: The Labor-Crisis Origins of National Housing Policy and the Reconstruction of the Working-Class Community, 1917-1919." In From Tenemants to the Taylor Homes; In Search of an Urban Housing Policy in Twentieth-Century American. John F. Bauman, Roger Biles, Kristin M. Szylvian, eds. pp. 60-80. University Park, PA: Pennsylvania State University, 2000. Hanchett, Thomas W. "The Other 'Subsidized Housing': Federal Aid to Suburbanization, 1940-1960s." In From Tenements to the Taylor Homes; In Search of an Urban Housing Policy in Twentieth-Century American. John F. Bauman, Roger Biles, Kristin M. Szylvian, eds. Pp. 163-179. University Park, PA: Pennsylvania State University, 2000. Howard, Ebenezer. Garden Cities of Tomorrow. London: Swan Sonnenschein & Co., Ltd., 1902. Major Bibliographic References: Historic Inventory Report Thursday, October 28, 2010 Page 6 of 6 2010 South Elevation, Looking Northeast Photos West Elevation, Looking Northeast 2010 North Elevation, Looking Southeast 2010 Historic Inventory Report Thursday, October 28, 2010 Page 1 of 6 Identification Hetzel, Christopher PO Box 2316 Survey Name:Date Recorded: Field Recorder: Owner's Name:Renton Housing Authority 10/06/2010 City:Renton Classification:Building Resource Status:Comments: State:WA Zip:98056-0316 Within a District?No Contributing?No National Register: Local District: National Register District/Thematic Nomination Name: Owner Address: Survey/Inventory Not Eligible Eligibility Status: Determination Date: Determination Comments: Not Determined - SHPO 1/1/0001 Sunset Terrace Redevelopment Subarea Sunset Terrace Public Housing Project 2635 Sunset Ln NE, Renton, WA 98056 Location Field Site No.DAHP No. Historic Name: Common Name:2635 Sunset Ln NE Property Address: Comments: King County T23R05E 09 Township/Range/EW Section 1/4 Sec 1/4 1/4 Sec RENTON Quadrangle Tax No./Parcel No.7227801055 Plat/Block/Lot Acreage Supplemental Map(s) Coordinate Reference Projection: Datum: Easting: Northing: HARN (feet) Washington State Plane South 1224325 794307 Historic Inventory Report Thursday, October 28, 2010 Page 2 of 6 Description Narrative Historic Use:Domestic - Multiple Family House Current Use:Domestic - Multiple Family House Plan:Rectangle Stories:2 Structural System:Platform Frame Changes to Plan:Intact Changes to Interior:Unknown Changes to Original Cladding:Extensive Changes to Windows:Extensive Changes to Other:Not Applicable Other (specify): Style: Form/Type: Cladding: Foundation: Roof Type:Roof Material: Architecture/Landscape Architecture Study Unit Other Date of Construction: Architect:George W. Stoddard-Huggard & Associates Engineer: Property appears to meet criteria for the National Register of Historic Places:No Property is located in a potential historic district (National and/or local):No Property potentially contributes to a historic district (National and/or local):No Builder:Dahlgren Construction Company Veneer - Vinyl SidingModern Gable - Side Gable Asphalt / Composition - Shingle Concrete - Poured Multi-Family 1977 Remodel 1959 Built Date Historic Inventory Report Thursday, October 28, 2010 Page 3 of 6 The property has been evaluated according to the eligibility criteria for listing in the National Register of Historic Places (NRHP). Due to the many alterations, the integrity of the individual buildings and the complex as a whole is considered poor. The Sunset Terrace public housing complex resulted from federal investment in public housing during the postwar period and is associated with a well-known Seattle architect. However, it is a late example of its architectural type and its individual elements were substantially altered by rehabilitations in the 1970s and 1990s, such that they no longer appear to retain sufficient integrity to convey their historical significance. Based on our review, the property has poor integrity and does not appear eligible for listing in the NRHP individually or as a potential historic district. Stoddard’s design for Sunset Terrace appears to have been strongly influenced by the Garden City movement and exhibits features and characteristics of garden style apartments. All 27 buildings were arranged along curvilinear streets in locations to best take advantage of the original topography and create open, pleasing landscapes for residents. Throughout Sunset Terrace, each building is separated by open courtyard areas with outdoor space dedicated to individual housing units. At the rear of each unit, this space was originally identified by unit-specific metal revolving clotheslines. Additional design features included minimal ornamentation, aluminum windows, and varied exterior wall cladding of horizontal rustic cedar siding, vertical rough cedar channel siding, or resawn split cedar shake siding with some brick veneer. The Renton Housing Authority completed a comprehensive rehabilitation of Sunset Terrace in the 1970s, which resulted in the removal and replacement of many of these features. The original windows were replaced with new metal windows, unit doors were replaced, the revolving clotheslines were removed, and the original cedar wall claddings were replaced with vinyl siding. Subsequent changes occurred in the early 1990s when buildings in the complex were upgraded for ADA accessibility. Kitchens and bathrooms in the individual housing units were also substantially renovated at this time. The property was evaluated at a reconnaissance level in a cultural resources survey completed for the proposed Sunset Terrace Redevelopment Subarea in the City of Renton, King County, Washington. It is one of 27 buildings constructed by the Housing Authority of the City of Renton as part of the Sunset Terrace public housing complex authorized on June 28, 1958 and completed in 1959. Sunset Terrace consisted of a complex of 100 low-income housing units comprising both one- and two-story structures arranged along curvilinear streets. The complex was constructed by Seattle-based Dahlgren Construction Company according to designs by George W. Stoddard-Huggard & Associates. George W. Stoddard, a prominent Seattle architect and principal of the firm, is credited with the design of many well known public, private, and civic structures in the Seattle area, including such noted properties as the High School Memorial Stadium, the Green Lake Aqua Theater, and the Yesler Terrace Defense Housing Project. Stoddard retired in 1960, and the Sunset Terrace public housing complex is believed to have been one of his last commissions. Statement of Significance: Historic Inventory Report Thursday, October 28, 2010 Page 4 of 6 The property contains a two-story four unit apartment building constructed as part of the Sunset Terrace public housing complex in 1958-1959. Buildings in the complex were designed in one of six standard design types, each exhibiting Modern style elements. This building was constructed as a type “E” building. The building has a long rectangular plan and consists of platform frame wood construction on a poured concrete foundation. It has a very low pitch side gable roof clad with composition asphalt shingles and featuring slightly overhanging eaves with a wide fascia. Four small cylindrical, metal roof vents stand equally spaced along the roof ridge line. The exterior walls are clad with non-original horizontally applied vinyl siding. This siding replaced the building’s original resawn split cedar shake siding during rehabilitation of the building in the 1970s. The building has a northwest-southeast orientation and its primary (northwest) facade forms a landscaped courtyard between another building to the northwest. The primary facade is symmetrically divided and consists of four nearly identical sections, each comprising a single housing unit. On the first story, each section consists of a single door opening fit with a non- original paneled door, flanked by a wide tripartite picture window. Two cantilevered shed roofs extend between the sections sheltering each pair of door openings. The doors open onto poured concrete stoops connected to poured concrete sidewalks that lead to the street. On the second story, each section is punctuated by a slightly shorter, tripartite picture window. The building’s rear elevation is similarly divided, each section containing a single door opening flanked by two small windows on the first story, and featuring a wide tripartite picture window and another small window on the second story. The two center sections on the second story projects from the elevation, cantilevered over the first story. The building’s side elevations are unadorned. All of the building’s original windows were replaced with non- original metal windows in the 1970s. Other alterations to the building include the removal of original metal revolving clothes lines outside the rear entrance of each unit, and complete renovations of the building’s bathrooms and kitchens and ADA accessibility improvements in the early 1990s. Description of Physical Appearance: Historic Inventory Report Thursday, October 28, 2010 Page 5 of 6 Ochsner, Jeffery Karl, ed. Shaping Seattle Architecture: A Historical Guide to the Architects. Seattle, WA: University of Washington Press, 1998. Lord, Tom Forrester. Decent Housing: A Promise to Keep. Federal Housing Policy and its Impact on the City. Cambridge, MA: Schenkman Publishing Company, Inc., 1977. Madison, Charles A. Preface. In How the Other Half Lives. Jacob A. Riis. New York, NY: Dover Publications, Inc., 1971. __________. "Obituaries: George W. Stoddard." 29 September 1967:16. Seattle, WA. Rabinowitz, Alan. Urban Economics and Land Use in America: The Transformation of Cities in the Twentieth Century. Armonk, NY: M.E. Sharpe, Inc., 2004. The Seattle Times. "Seattle Firm Supported for Housing Job." 18 March 1959:44. Seattle, WA. Elenga, Maureen R. Seattle Architecture: A Walking Guide to Downtown. Seattle, WA: Seattle Architecture Foundation, 2007. Associated Press. "Tacoma Gets Housing Blues; To Renton It’s Not News." The Seattle Times. Seattle, WA, 29 June 1958. George W. Stoddard-Huggard & Associates. "Housing Authority of the City of Renton: Project Washington II-I, Renton Highlands, Renton, Washington." Construction Plans. Seattle, WA: George W. Stoddard- Huggard & Associates Architects & Engineers, 1958. On file with Renton Housing Authority, Renton, WA. Karolak, Eric J. "No Idea of Doing Anything Wonderful: The Labor-Crisis Origins of National Housing Policy and the Reconstruction of the Working-Class Community, 1917-1919." In From Tenemants to the Taylor Homes; In Search of an Urban Housing Policy in Twentieth-Century American. John F. Bauman, Roger Biles, Kristin M. Szylvian, eds. pp. 60-80. University Park, PA: Pennsylvania State University, 2000. Hanchett, Thomas W. "The Other 'Subsidized Housing': Federal Aid to Suburbanization, 1940-1960s." In From Tenements to the Taylor Homes; In Search of an Urban Housing Policy in Twentieth-Century American. John F. Bauman, Roger Biles, Kristin M. Szylvian, eds. Pp. 163-179. University Park, PA: Pennsylvania State University, 2000. Howard, Ebenezer. Garden Cities of Tomorrow. London: Swan Sonnenschein & Co., Ltd., 1902. Major Bibliographic References: Historic Inventory Report Thursday, October 28, 2010 Page 6 of 6 2010 Southeast and Northeast, Looking West Photos Northeast Elevation, Looking West 2010 Northwest and Northeast Elevations, Looking South 2010 Historic Inventory Report Thursday, October 28, 2010 Page 1 of 6 Identification Hetzel, Christopher PO Box 2316 Survey Name:Date Recorded: Field Recorder: Owner's Name:Renton Housing Authority 10/06/2010 City:Renton Classification:Building Resource Status:Comments: State:WA Zip:98056-0316 Within a District?No Contributing?No National Register: Local District: National Register District/Thematic Nomination Name: Owner Address: Survey/Inventory Not Eligible Eligibility Status: Determination Date: Determination Comments: Not Determined - SHPO 1/1/0001 Sunset Terrace Redevelopment Subarea Sunset Terrace Public Housing Project 2641 Sunset Ln NE, Renton, WA 98056 Location Field Site No.DAHP No. Historic Name: Common Name:2641 Sunset Ln NE Property Address: Comments: King County T23R05E 09 Township/Range/EW Section 1/4 Sec 1/4 1/4 Sec RENTON Quadrangle Tax No./Parcel No.7227801055 Plat/Block/Lot Acreage Supplemental Map(s) Coordinate Reference Projection: Datum: Easting: Northing: HARN (feet) Washington State Plane South 1224396 794273 Historic Inventory Report Thursday, October 28, 2010 Page 2 of 6 Description Narrative Historic Use:Domestic - Multiple Family House Current Use:Domestic - Multiple Family House Plan:Rectangle Stories:2 Structural System:Platform Frame Changes to Plan:Intact Changes to Interior:Unknown Changes to Original Cladding:Extensive Changes to Windows:Extensive Changes to Other:Not Applicable Other (specify): Style: Form/Type: Cladding: Foundation: Roof Type:Roof Material: Architecture/Landscape Architecture Study Unit Other Date of Construction: Architect:George W. Stoddard-Huggard & Associates Engineer: Property appears to meet criteria for the National Register of Historic Places:No Property is located in a potential historic district (National and/or local):No Property potentially contributes to a historic district (National and/or local):No Builder:Dahlgren Construction Company Veneer - Vinyl SidingModern Gable - Side Gable Asphalt / Composition - Shingle Concrete - Poured Multi-Family 1977 Remodel 1959 Built Date Historic Inventory Report Thursday, October 28, 2010 Page 3 of 6 The property has been evaluated according to the eligibility criteria for listing in the National Register of Historic Places (NRHP). Due to the many alterations, the integrity of the individual buildings and the complex as a whole is considered poor. The Sunset Terrace public housing complex resulted from federal investment in public housing during the postwar period and is associated with a well-known Seattle architect. However, it is a late example of its architectural type and its individual elements were substantially altered by rehabilitations in the 1970s and 1990s, such that they no longer appear to retain sufficient integrity to convey their historical significance. Based on our review, the property has poor integrity and does not appear eligible for listing in the NRHP individually or as a potential historic district. Stoddard’s design for Sunset Terrace appears to have been strongly influenced by the Garden City movement and exhibits features and characteristics of garden style apartments. All 27 buildings were arranged along curvilinear streets in locations to best take advantage of the original topography and create open, pleasing landscapes for residents. Throughout Sunset Terrace, each building is separated by open courtyard areas with outdoor space dedicated to individual housing units. At the rear of each unit, this space was originally identified by unit-specific metal revolving clotheslines. Additional design features included minimal ornamentation, aluminum windows, and varied exterior wall cladding of horizontal rustic cedar siding, vertical rough cedar channel siding, or resawn split cedar shake siding with some brick veneer. The Renton Housing Authority completed a comprehensive rehabilitation of Sunset Terrace in the 1970s, which resulted in the removal and replacement of many of these features. The original windows were replaced with new metal windows, unit doors were replaced, the revolving clotheslines were removed, and the original cedar wall claddings were replaced with vinyl siding. Subsequent changes occurred in the early 1990s when buildings in the complex were upgraded for ADA accessibility. Kitchens and bathrooms in the individual housing units were also substantially renovated at this time. The property was evaluated at a reconnaissance level in a cultural resources survey completed for the proposed Sunset Terrace Redevelopment Subarea in the City of Renton, King County, Washington. It is one of 27 buildings constructed by the Housing Authority of the City of Renton as part of the Sunset Terrace public housing complex authorized on June 28, 1958 and completed in 1959. Sunset Terrace consisted of a complex of 100 low-income housing units comprising both one- and two-story structures arranged along curvilinear streets. The complex was constructed by Seattle-based Dahlgren Construction Company according to designs by George W. Stoddard-Huggard & Associates. George W. Stoddard, a prominent Seattle architect and principal of the firm, is credited with the design of many well known public, private, and civic structures in the Seattle area, including such noted properties as the High School Memorial Stadium, the Green Lake Aqua Theater, and the Yesler Terrace Defense Housing Project. Stoddard retired in 1960, and the Sunset Terrace public housing complex is believed to have been one of his last commissions. Statement of Significance: Historic Inventory Report Thursday, October 28, 2010 Page 4 of 6 The property contains a two-story four unit apartment building constructed as part of the Sunset Terrace public housing complex in 1958-1959. Buildings in the complex were designed in one of six standard design types, each exhibiting Modern style elements. This building was constructed as a type “E” building. The building has a long rectangular plan and consists of platform frame wood construction on a poured concrete foundation. It has a very low pitch side gable roof clad with composition asphalt shingles and featuring slightly overhanging eaves with a wide fascia. Four small cylindrical, metal roof vents stand equally spaced along the roof ridge line. The exterior walls are clad with non-original horizontally applied vinyl siding. This siding replaced the building’s original horizontally applied rustic cedar beveled siding during rehabilitation of the building in the 1970s. The building has a southeast-northwest orientation and its primary (southeast) facade forms a landscaped courtyard between another building to the southeast. The primary facade is symmetrically divided and consists of four nearly identical sections, each comprising a single housing unit. On the first story, each section consists of a single door opening fit with a non- original paneled door, flanked by a wide tripartite picture window. Two cantilevered shed roofs extend between the sections sheltering each pair of door openings. The doors open onto poured concrete stoops connected to poured concrete sidewalks that lead to the street. On the second story, each section is punctuated by a slightly shorter, tripartite picture window. The building’s rear elevation is similarly divided, each section containing a single door opening flanked by two small windows on the first story, and featuring a wide tripartite picture window and another small window on the second story. The two center sections on the second story projects from the elevation, cantilevered over the first story. The building’s side elevations are unadorned. All of the building’s original windows were replaced with non- original metal windows in the 1970s. Other alterations to the building include the removal of original metal revolving clothes lines outside the rear entrance of each unit, and complete renovations of the building’s bathrooms and kitchens and ADA accessibility improvements in the early 1990s. Description of Physical Appearance: Historic Inventory Report Thursday, October 28, 2010 Page 5 of 6 Ochsner, Jeffery Karl, ed. Shaping Seattle Architecture: A Historical Guide to the Architects. Seattle, WA: University of Washington Press, 1998. Lord, Tom Forrester. Decent Housing: A Promise to Keep. Federal Housing Policy and its Impact on the City. Cambridge, MA: Schenkman Publishing Company, Inc., 1977. Madison, Charles A. Preface. In How the Other Half Lives. Jacob A. Riis. New York, NY: Dover Publications, Inc., 1971. __________. "Obituaries: George W. Stoddard." 29 September 1967:16. Seattle, WA. Rabinowitz, Alan. Urban Economics and Land Use in America: The Transformation of Cities in the Twentieth Century. Armonk, NY: M.E. Sharpe, Inc., 2004. The Seattle Times. "Seattle Firm Supported for Housing Job." 18 March 1959:44. Seattle, WA. Elenga, Maureen R. Seattle Architecture: A Walking Guide to Downtown. Seattle, WA: Seattle Architecture Foundation, 2007. Associated Press. "Tacoma Gets Housing Blues; To Renton It’s Not News." The Seattle Times. Seattle, WA, 29 June 1958. George W. Stoddard-Huggard & Associates. "Housing Authority of the City of Renton: Project Washington II-I, Renton Highlands, Renton, Washington." Construction Plans. Seattle, WA: George W. Stoddard- Huggard & Associates Architects & Engineers, 1958. On file with Renton Housing Authority, Renton, WA. Karolak, Eric J. "No Idea of Doing Anything Wonderful: The Labor-Crisis Origins of National Housing Policy and the Reconstruction of the Working-Class Community, 1917-1919." In From Tenemants to the Taylor Homes; In Search of an Urban Housing Policy in Twentieth-Century American. John F. Bauman, Roger Biles, Kristin M. Szylvian, eds. pp. 60-80. University Park, PA: Pennsylvania State University, 2000. Hanchett, Thomas W. "The Other 'Subsidized Housing': Federal Aid to Suburbanization, 1940-1960s." In From Tenements to the Taylor Homes; In Search of an Urban Housing Policy in Twentieth-Century American. John F. Bauman, Roger Biles, Kristin M. Szylvian, eds. Pp. 163-179. University Park, PA: Pennsylvania State University, 2000. Howard, Ebenezer. Garden Cities of Tomorrow. London: Swan Sonnenschein & Co., Ltd., 1902. Major Bibliographic References: Historic Inventory Report Thursday, October 28, 2010 Page 6 of 6 2010 North and West Elevation, Looking Southeast Photos East and North Elevations, Looking Southwest 2010 East and North Elevations, Looking Southwest 2010 Historic Inventory Report Thursday, October 28, 2010 Page 1 of 6 Identification Hetzel, Christopher PO Box 2316 Survey Name:Date Recorded: Field Recorder: Owner's Name:Renton Housing Authority 10/06/2010 City:Renton Classification:Building Resource Status:Comments: State:WA Zip:98056-0316 Within a District?No Contributing?No National Register: Local District: National Register District/Thematic Nomination Name: Owner Address: Survey/Inventory Not Eligible Eligibility Status: Determination Date: Determination Comments: Not Determined - SHPO 1/1/0001 Sunset Terrace Redevelopment Subarea Sunset Terrace Public Housing Complex 2644 Sunset Ln NE, Renton, WA 98056 Location Field Site No.DAHP No. Historic Name: Common Name:2644 Sunset Ln NE Property Address: Comments: King County T23R05E 09 Township/Range/EW Section 1/4 Sec 1/4 1/4 Sec RENTON Quadrangle Tax No./Parcel No.7227801055 Plat/Block/Lot Acreage Supplemental Map(s) Coordinate Reference Projection: Datum: Easting: Northing: HARN (feet) Washington State Plane South 1224456 794408 Historic Inventory Report Thursday, October 28, 2010 Page 2 of 6 Description Narrative Historic Use:Domestic - Multiple Family House Current Use:Domestic - Multiple Family House Plan:Rectangle Stories:2 Structural System:Platform Frame Changes to Plan:Intact Changes to Interior:Unknown Changes to Original Cladding:Extensive Changes to Windows:Extensive Changes to Other:Not Applicable Other (specify): Style: Form/Type: Cladding: Foundation: Roof Type:Roof Material: Architecture/Landscape Architecture Study Unit Other Date of Construction: Architect:George W. Stoddard-Huggard & Associates Engineer: Property appears to meet criteria for the National Register of Historic Places:No Property is located in a potential historic district (National and/or local):No Property potentially contributes to a historic district (National and/or local):No Builder:Dahlgren Construction Company Veneer - Vinyl SidingModern Gable - Side Gable Asphalt / Composition - Shingle Concrete - Poured Multi-Family 1977 Remodel 1959 Built Date Historic Inventory Report Thursday, October 28, 2010 Page 3 of 6 The property has been evaluated according to the eligibility criteria for listing in the National Register of Historic Places (NRHP). Due to the many alterations, the integrity of the individual buildings and the complex as a whole is considered poor. The Sunset Terrace public housing complex resulted from federal investment in public housing during the postwar period and is associated with a well-known Seattle architect. However, it is a late example of its architectural type and its individual elements were substantially altered by rehabilitations in the 1970s and 1990s, such that they no longer appear to retain sufficient integrity to convey their historical significance. Based on our review, the property has poor integrity and does not appear eligible for listing in the NRHP individually or as a potential historic district. Stoddard’s design for Sunset Terrace appears to have been strongly influenced by the Garden City movement and exhibits features and characteristics of garden style apartments. All 27 buildings were arranged along curvilinear streets in locations to best take advantage of the original topography and create open, pleasing landscapes for residents. Throughout Sunset Terrace, each building is separated by open courtyard areas with outdoor space dedicated to individual housing units. At the rear of each unit, this space was originally identified by unit-specific metal revolving clotheslines. Additional design features included minimal ornamentation, aluminum windows, and varied exterior wall cladding of horizontal rustic cedar siding, vertical rough cedar channel siding, or resawn split cedar shake siding with some brick veneer. The Renton Housing Authority completed a comprehensive rehabilitation of Sunset Terrace in the 1970s, which resulted in the removal and replacement of many of these features. The original windows were replaced with new metal windows, unit doors were replaced, the revolving clotheslines were removed, and the original cedar wall claddings were replaced with vinyl siding. Subsequent changes occurred in the early 1990s when buildings in the complex were upgraded for ADA accessibility. Kitchens and bathrooms in the individual housing units were also substantially renovated at this time. The property was evaluated at a reconnaissance level in a cultural resources survey completed for the proposed Sunset Terrace Redevelopment Subarea in the City of Renton, King County, Washington. It is one of 27 buildings constructed by the Housing Authority of the City of Renton as part of the Sunset Terrace public housing complex authorized on June 28, 1958 and completed in 1959. Sunset Terrace consisted of a complex of 100 low-income housing units comprising both one- and two-story structures arranged along curvilinear streets. The complex was constructed by Seattle-based Dahlgren Construction Company according to designs by George W. Stoddard-Huggard & Associates. George W. Stoddard, a prominent Seattle architect and principal of the firm, is credited with the design of many well known public, private, and civic structures in the Seattle area, including such noted properties as the High School Memorial Stadium, the Green Lake Aqua Theater, and the Yesler Terrace Defense Housing Project. Stoddard retired in 1960, and the Sunset Terrace public housing complex is believed to have been one of his last commissions. Statement of Significance: Historic Inventory Report Thursday, October 28, 2010 Page 4 of 6 The property contains a two-story four unit apartment building constructed as part of the Sunset Terrace public housing complex in 1958-1959. Buildings in the complex were designed in one of six standard design types, each exhibiting Modern style elements. This building was constructed as a type “C” building. The building has a long rectangular plan and consists of platform frame wood construction on a poured concrete foundation. It has a very low pitch side gable roof clad with composition asphalt shingles and featuring slightly overhanging eaves with a wide fascia. Four small cylindrical, metal roof vents stand equally spaced along the roof ridge line. The exterior walls are clad with non-original horizontally applied vinyl siding. This siding replaced the building’s original, vertically applied, rough cedar channel siding during rehabilitation of the building in the 1970s. The building has a south-north orientation and its primary (south) facade fronts Sunset Lane NE. The primary facade is symmetrically divided and consists of four nearly identical sections, each comprising a single housing unit. On the first story, each section consists of a single door opening fit with a non-original paneled door, flanked by a wide tripartite picture window. Two cantilevered shed roofs extend between the sections sheltering each pair of door openings. The doors open onto poured concrete stoops connected to poured concrete sidewalks that lead to the street. On the second story, the two outer sections are punctuated by a slightly shorter, tripartite picture window and by two tripartite picture windows in the center sections. The building’s rear elevation is similarly divided, each section containing a single door opening flanked by a wide tripartite picture window on the first story, and featuring a wide tripartite picture window and a small metal sliding window in the outer bays and two tripartite picture windows and a small sliding window in the center bays on the second story. The two center sections on the second story projects from the elevation, cantilevered over the first story. The building’s side elevations are unadorned. All of the building’s original windows were replaced with non-original metal windows in the 1970s. Other alterations to the building include the removal of original metal revolving clothes lines outside the rear entrance of each unit, and complete renovations of the building’s bathrooms and kitchens and ADA accessibility improvements in the early 1990s. Description of Physical Appearance: Historic Inventory Report Thursday, October 28, 2010 Page 5 of 6 Ochsner, Jeffery Karl, ed. Shaping Seattle Architecture: A Historical Guide to the Architects. Seattle, WA: University of Washington Press, 1998. Lord, Tom Forrester. Decent Housing: A Promise to Keep. Federal Housing Policy and its Impact on the City. Cambridge, MA: Schenkman Publishing Company, Inc., 1977. Madison, Charles A. Preface. In How the Other Half Lives. Jacob A. Riis. New York, NY: Dover Publications, Inc., 1971. __________. "Obituaries: George W. Stoddard." 29 September 1967:16. Seattle, WA. Rabinowitz, Alan. Urban Economics and Land Use in America: The Transformation of Cities in the Twentieth Century. Armonk, NY: M.E. Sharpe, Inc., 2004. The Seattle Times. "Seattle Firm Supported for Housing Job." 18 March 1959:44. Seattle, WA. Elenga, Maureen R. Seattle Architecture: A Walking Guide to Downtown. Seattle, WA: Seattle Architecture Foundation, 2007. Associated Press. "Tacoma Gets Housing Blues; To Renton It’s Not News." The Seattle Times. Seattle, WA, 29 June 1958. George W. Stoddard-Huggard & Associates. "Housing Authority of the City of Renton: Project Washington II-I, Renton Highlands, Renton, Washington." Construction Plans. Seattle, WA: George W. Stoddard- Huggard & Associates Architects & Engineers, 1958. On file with Renton Housing Authority, Renton, WA. Karolak, Eric J. "No Idea of Doing Anything Wonderful: The Labor-Crisis Origins of National Housing Policy and the Reconstruction of the Working-Class Community, 1917-1919." In From Tenemants to the Taylor Homes; In Search of an Urban Housing Policy in Twentieth-Century American. John F. Bauman, Roger Biles, Kristin M. Szylvian, eds. pp. 60-80. University Park, PA: Pennsylvania State University, 2000. Hanchett, Thomas W. "The Other 'Subsidized Housing': Federal Aid to Suburbanization, 1940-1960s." In From Tenements to the Taylor Homes; In Search of an Urban Housing Policy in Twentieth-Century American. John F. Bauman, Roger Biles, Kristin M. Szylvian, eds. Pp. 163-179. University Park, PA: Pennsylvania State University, 2000. Howard, Ebenezer. Garden Cities of Tomorrow. London: Swan Sonnenschein & Co., Ltd., 1902. Major Bibliographic References: Historic Inventory Report Thursday, October 28, 2010 Page 6 of 6 East and North Elevations, Looking Southwest 2010 South and East Elevation, Looking Northwest 2010 Photos West and South Elevations, Looking Northeast 2010 South Elevation, Looking North 2010 Historic Inventory Report Thursday, October 28, 2010 Page 1 of 6 Identification Hetzel, Christopher PO Box 2316 Survey Name:Date Recorded: Field Recorder: Owner's Name:Renton Housing Authority 10/06/2010 City:Renton Classification:Building Resource Status:Comments: State:WA Zip:98056-0316 Within a District?No Contributing?No National Register: Local District: National Register District/Thematic Nomination Name: Owner Address: Survey/Inventory Not Eligible Eligibility Status: Determination Date: Determination Comments: Not Determined - SHPO 1/1/0001 Sunset Terrace Redevelopment Subarea Sunset Terrace Public Housing Complex 2647 Sunset Ln NE, Renton, WA 98056 Location Field Site No.DAHP No. Historic Name: Common Name:2647 Sunset Ln NE Property Address: Comments: King County T23R05E 09 Township/Range/EW Section 1/4 Sec 1/4 1/4 Sec RENTON Quadrangle Tax No./Parcel No.7227801055 Plat/Block/Lot Acreage Supplemental Map(s) Coordinate Reference Projection: Datum: Easting: Northing: HARN (feet) Washington State Plane South 1224472 794257 Historic Inventory Report Thursday, October 28, 2010 Page 2 of 6 Description Narrative Historic Use:Domestic - Multiple Family House Current Use:Domestic - Multiple Family House Plan:Rectangle Stories:2 Structural System:Balloon Frame Changes to Plan:Intact Changes to Interior:Unknown Changes to Original Cladding:Extensive Changes to Windows:Extensive Changes to Other:Not Applicable Other (specify): Style: Form/Type: Cladding: Foundation: Roof Type:Roof Material: Architecture/Landscape Architecture Study Unit Other Date of Construction: Architect:George W. Stoddard-Huggard & Associates Engineer: Property appears to meet criteria for the National Register of Historic Places:No Property is located in a potential historic district (National and/or local):No Property potentially contributes to a historic district (National and/or local):No Builder:Dahlgren Construction Company Veneer - Vinyl SidingModern Gable - Side Gable Asphalt / Composition - Shingle Concrete - Poured Multi-Family 1977 Remodel 1959 Built Date Historic Inventory Report Thursday, October 28, 2010 Page 3 of 6 The property has been evaluated according to the eligibility criteria for listing in the National Register of Historic Places (NRHP). Due to the many alterations, the integrity of the individual buildings and the complex as a whole is considered poor. The Sunset Terrace public housing complex resulted from federal investment in public housing during the postwar period and is associated with a well-known Seattle architect. However, it is a late example of its architectural type and its individual elements were substantially altered by rehabilitations in the 1970s and 1990s, such that they no longer appear to retain sufficient integrity to convey their historical significance. Based on our review, the property has poor integrity and does not appear eligible for listing in the NRHP individually or as a potential historic district. Stoddard’s design for Sunset Terrace appears to have been strongly influenced by the Garden City movement and exhibits features and characteristics of garden style apartments. All 27 buildings were arranged along curvilinear streets in locations to best take advantage of the original topography and create open, pleasing landscapes for residents. Throughout Sunset Terrace, each building is separated by open courtyard areas with outdoor space dedicated to individual housing units. At the rear of each unit, this space was originally identified by unit-specific metal revolving clotheslines. Additional design features included minimal ornamentation, aluminum windows, and varied exterior wall cladding of horizontal rustic cedar siding, vertical rough cedar channel siding, or resawn split cedar shake siding with some brick veneer. The Renton Housing Authority completed a comprehensive rehabilitation of Sunset Terrace in the 1970s, which resulted in the removal and replacement of many of these features. The original windows were replaced with new metal windows, unit doors were replaced, the revolving clotheslines were removed, and the original cedar wall claddings were replaced with vinyl siding. Subsequent changes occurred in the early 1990s when buildings in the complex were upgraded for ADA accessibility. Kitchens and bathrooms in the individual housing units were also substantially renovated at this time. The property was evaluated at a reconnaissance level in a cultural resources survey completed for the proposed Sunset Terrace Redevelopment Subarea in the City of Renton, King County, Washington. It is one of 27 buildings constructed by the Housing Authority of the City of Renton as part of the Sunset Terrace public housing complex authorized on June 28, 1958 and completed in 1959. Sunset Terrace consisted of a complex of 100 low-income housing units comprising both one- and two-story structures arranged along curvilinear streets. The complex was constructed by Seattle-based Dahlgren Construction Company according to designs by George W. Stoddard-Huggard & Associates. George W. Stoddard, a prominent Seattle architect and principal of the firm, is credited with the design of many well known public, private, and civic structures in the Seattle area, including such noted properties as the High School Memorial Stadium, the Green Lake Aqua Theater, and the Yesler Terrace Defense Housing Project. Stoddard retired in 1960, and the Sunset Terrace public housing complex is believed to have been one of his last commissions. Statement of Significance: Historic Inventory Report Thursday, October 28, 2010 Page 4 of 6 The property contains a two-story four unit apartment building constructed as part of the Sunset Terrace public housing complex in 1958-1959. Buildings in the complex were designed in one of six standard design types, each exhibiting Modern style elements. This building was constructed as a type “E” building. The building has a long rectangular plan and consists of platform frame wood construction on a poured concrete foundation. It has a very low pitch side gable roof clad with composition asphalt shingles and featuring slightly overhanging eaves with a wide fascia. Four small cylindrical, metal roof vents stand equally spaced along the roof ridge line. The exterior walls are clad with non-original horizontally applied vinyl siding. This siding replaced the building’s original horizontally applied rustic cedar beveled siding during rehabilitation of the building in the 1970s. The building has a west-east orientation and its primary (west) facade forms a landscaped courtyard between another building to the west. The primary facade is symmetrically divided and consists of four nearly identical sections, each comprising a single housing unit. On the first story, each section consists of a single door opening fit with a non-original paneled door, flanked by a wide tripartite picture window. Two cantilevered shed roofs extend between the sections sheltering each pair of door openings. The doors open onto poured concrete stoops connected to poured concrete sidewalks that lead to the street. On the second story, each section is punctuated by a slightly shorter, tripartite picture window. The building’s rear elevation is similarly divided, each section containing a single door opening flanked by two small windows on the first story, and featuring a wide tripartite picture window and another small window on the second story. The two center sections on the second story projects from the elevation, cantilevered over the first story. The building’s side elevations are unadorned. All of the building’s original windows were replaced with non-original metal windows in the 1970s. Other alterations to the building include the removal of original metal revolving clothes lines outside the rear entrance of each unit, and complete renovations of the building’s bathrooms and kitchens and ADA accessibility improvements in the early 1990s. Description of Physical Appearance: Historic Inventory Report Thursday, October 28, 2010 Page 5 of 6 Ochsner, Jeffery Karl, ed. Shaping Seattle Architecture: A Historical Guide to the Architects. Seattle, WA: University of Washington Press, 1998. Lord, Tom Forrester. Decent Housing: A Promise to Keep. Federal Housing Policy and its Impact on the City. Cambridge, MA: Schenkman Publishing Company, Inc., 1977. Madison, Charles A. Preface. In How the Other Half Lives. Jacob A. Riis. New York, NY: Dover Publications, Inc., 1971. __________. "Obituaries: George W. Stoddard." 29 September 1967:16. Seattle, WA. Rabinowitz, Alan. Urban Economics and Land Use in America: The Transformation of Cities in the Twentieth Century. Armonk, NY: M.E. Sharpe, Inc., 2004. The Seattle Times. "Seattle Firm Supported for Housing Job." 18 March 1959:44. Seattle, WA. Elenga, Maureen R. Seattle Architecture: A Walking Guide to Downtown. Seattle, WA: Seattle Architecture Foundation, 2007. Associated Press. "Tacoma Gets Housing Blues; To Renton It’s Not News." The Seattle Times. Seattle, WA, 29 June 1958. George W. Stoddard-Huggard & Associates. "Housing Authority of the City of Renton: Project Washington II-I, Renton Highlands, Renton, Washington." Construction Plans. Seattle, WA: George W. Stoddard- Huggard & Associates Architects & Engineers, 1958. On file with Renton Housing Authority, Renton, WA. Karolak, Eric J. "No Idea of Doing Anything Wonderful: The Labor-Crisis Origins of National Housing Policy and the Reconstruction of the Working-Class Community, 1917-1919." In From Tenemants to the Taylor Homes; In Search of an Urban Housing Policy in Twentieth-Century American. John F. Bauman, Roger Biles, Kristin M. Szylvian, eds. pp. 60-80. University Park, PA: Pennsylvania State University, 2000. Hanchett, Thomas W. "The Other 'Subsidized Housing': Federal Aid to Suburbanization, 1940-1960s." In From Tenements to the Taylor Homes; In Search of an Urban Housing Policy in Twentieth-Century American. John F. Bauman, Roger Biles, Kristin M. Szylvian, eds. Pp. 163-179. University Park, PA: Pennsylvania State University, 2000. Howard, Ebenezer. Garden Cities of Tomorrow. London: Swan Sonnenschein & Co., Ltd., 1902. Major Bibliographic References: Historic Inventory Report Thursday, October 28, 2010 Page 6 of 6 2010 East Elevation, Looking Southwest Photos North Elevation, Looking South 2010 North and West Elevations, Looking Southeast 2010 Historic Inventory Report Thursday, October 28, 2010 Page 1 of 6 Identification Hetzel, Christopher PO Box 2316 Survey Name:Date Recorded: Field Recorder: Owner's Name:Renton Housing Authority 10/06/2010 City:Renton Classification:Building Resource Status:Comments: State:WA Zip:98056-0316 Within a District?No Contributing?No National Register: Local District: National Register District/Thematic Nomination Name: Owner Address: Survey/Inventory Not Eligible Eligibility Status: Determination Date: Determination Comments: Not Determined - SHPO 1/1/0001 Sunset Terrace Redevelopment Subarea Sunset Terrace Public Housing Complex 2711 Sunset Ln NE, Renton, WA 98056 Location Field Site No.DAHP No. Historic Name: Common Name:2711 Sunset Ln NE Property Address: Comments: King County T23R05E 09 Township/Range/EW Section 1/4 Sec 1/4 1/4 Sec RENTON Quadrangle Tax No./Parcel No.7227801055 Plat/Block/Lot Acreage Supplemental Map(s) Coordinate Reference Projection: Datum: Easting: Northing: HARN (feet) Washington State Plane South 1224741 794366 Historic Inventory Report Thursday, October 28, 2010 Page 2 of 6 Description Narrative Historic Use:Domestic - Multiple Family House Current Use:Domestic - Multiple Family House Plan:Rectangle Stories:2 Structural System:Platform Frame Changes to Plan:Intact Changes to Interior:Unknown Changes to Original Cladding:Extensive Changes to Windows:Extensive Changes to Other:Not Applicable Other (specify): Style: Form/Type: Cladding: Foundation: Roof Type:Roof Material: Architecture/Landscape Architecture Study Unit Other Date of Construction: Architect:George W. Stoddard-Huggard & Associates Engineer: Property appears to meet criteria for the National Register of Historic Places:No Property is located in a potential historic district (National and/or local):No Property potentially contributes to a historic district (National and/or local):No Builder:Dahlgren Construction Company Veneer - Vinyl SidingModern Gable - Side Gable Asphalt / Composition - Shingle Concrete - Poured Multi-Family 1977 Remodel 1959 Built Date Historic Inventory Report Thursday, October 28, 2010 Page 3 of 6 The property has been evaluated according to the eligibility criteria for listing in the National Register of Historic Places (NRHP). Due to the many alterations, the integrity of the individual buildings and the complex as a whole is considered poor. The Sunset Terrace public housing complex resulted from federal investment in public housing during the postwar period and is associated with a well-known Seattle architect. However, it is a late example of its architectural type and its individual elements were substantially altered by rehabilitations in the 1970s and 1990s, such that they no longer appear to retain sufficient integrity to convey their historical significance. Based on our review, the property has poor integrity and does not appear eligible for listing in the NRHP individually or as a potential historic district. Stoddard’s design for Sunset Terrace appears to have been strongly influenced by the Garden City movement and exhibits features and characteristics of garden style apartments. All 27 buildings were arranged along curvilinear streets in locations to best take advantage of the original topography and create open, pleasing landscapes for residents. Throughout Sunset Terrace, each building is separated by open courtyard areas with outdoor space dedicated to individual housing units. At the rear of each unit, this space was originally identified by unit-specific metal revolving clotheslines. Additional design features included minimal ornamentation, aluminum windows, and varied exterior wall cladding of horizontal rustic cedar siding, vertical rough cedar channel siding, or resawn split cedar shake siding with some brick veneer. The Renton Housing Authority completed a comprehensive rehabilitation of Sunset Terrace in the 1970s, which resulted in the removal and replacement of many of these features. The original windows were replaced with new metal windows, unit doors were replaced, the revolving clotheslines were removed, and the original cedar wall claddings were replaced with vinyl siding. Subsequent changes occurred in the early 1990s when buildings in the complex were upgraded for ADA accessibility. Kitchens and bathrooms in the individual housing units were also substantially renovated at this time. The property was evaluated at a reconnaissance level in a cultural resources survey completed for the proposed Sunset Terrace Redevelopment Subarea in the City of Renton, King County, Washington. It is one of 27 buildings constructed by the Housing Authority of the City of Renton as part of the Sunset Terrace public housing complex authorized on June 28, 1958 and completed in 1959. Sunset Terrace consisted of a complex of 100 low-income housing units comprising both one- and two-story structures arranged along curvilinear streets. The complex was constructed by Seattle-based Dahlgren Construction Company according to designs by George W. Stoddard-Huggard & Associates. George W. Stoddard, a prominent Seattle architect and principal of the firm, is credited with the design of many well known public, private, and civic structures in the Seattle area, including such noted properties as the High School Memorial Stadium, the Green Lake Aqua Theater, and the Yesler Terrace Defense Housing Project. Stoddard retired in 1960, and the Sunset Terrace public housing complex is believed to have been one of his last commissions. Statement of Significance: Historic Inventory Report Thursday, October 28, 2010 Page 4 of 6 The property contains a two-story four unit apartment building constructed as part of the Sunset Terrace public housing complex in 1958-1959. Buildings in the complex were designed in one of six standard design types, each exhibiting Modern style elements. This building was constructed as a type “C” building. The building has a long rectangular plan and consists of platform frame wood construction on a poured concrete foundation. It has a very low pitch side gable roof clad with composition asphalt shingles and featuring slightly overhanging eaves with a wide fascia. Four small cylindrical, metal roof vents stand equally spaced along the roof ridge line. The exterior walls are clad with non-original horizontally applied vinyl siding. This siding replaced the building’s original, vertically applied, rough cedar channel siding during rehabilitation of the building in the 1970s. The building has a northeast-southwest orientation and its primary (northeast) facade forms a landscaped courtyard with another building to the northeast. The primary facade is symmetrically divided and consists of four nearly identical sections, each comprising a single housing unit. On the first story, each section consists of a single door opening fit with a non-original paneled door, flanked by a wide tripartite picture window. Two cantilevered shed roofs extend between the sections sheltering each pair of door openings. The doors open onto poured concrete stoops connected to poured concrete sidewalks that lead to the street. On the second story, the two outer sections are punctuated by a slightly shorter, tripartite picture window and by two tripartite picture windows in the center sections. The building’s rear elevation is similarly divided, each section containing a single door opening flanked by a wide tripartite picture window on the first story, and featuring a wide tripartite picture window and a small metal sliding window in the outer bays and two tripartite picture windows and a small sliding window in the center bays on the second story. The two center sections on the second story projects from the elevation, cantilevered over the first story. The building’s side elevations are unadorned. All of the building’s original windows were replaced with non-original metal windows in the 1970s. Other alterations to the building include the removal of original metal revolving clothes lines outside the rear entrance of each unit, and complete renovations of the building’s bathrooms and kitchens and ADA accessibility improvements in the early 1990s. Description of Physical Appearance: Historic Inventory Report Thursday, October 28, 2010 Page 5 of 6 Ochsner, Jeffery Karl, ed. Shaping Seattle Architecture: A Historical Guide to the Architects. Seattle, WA: University of Washington Press, 1998. Lord, Tom Forrester. Decent Housing: A Promise to Keep. Federal Housing Policy and its Impact on the City. Cambridge, MA: Schenkman Publishing Company, Inc., 1977. Madison, Charles A. Preface. In How the Other Half Lives. Jacob A. Riis. New York, NY: Dover Publications, Inc., 1971. __________. "Obituaries: George W. Stoddard." 29 September 1967:16. Seattle, WA. Rabinowitz, Alan. Urban Economics and Land Use in America: The Transformation of Cities in the Twentieth Century. Armonk, NY: M.E. Sharpe, Inc., 2004. The Seattle Times. "Seattle Firm Supported for Housing Job." 18 March 1959:44. Seattle, WA. Elenga, Maureen R. Seattle Architecture: A Walking Guide to Downtown. Seattle, WA: Seattle Architecture Foundation, 2007. Associated Press. "Tacoma Gets Housing Blues; To Renton It’s Not News." The Seattle Times. Seattle, WA, 29 June 1958. George W. Stoddard-Huggard & Associates. "Housing Authority of the City of Renton: Project Washington II-I, Renton Highlands, Renton, Washington." Construction Plans. Seattle, WA: George W. Stoddard- Huggard & Associates Architects & Engineers, 1958. On file with Renton Housing Authority, Renton, WA. Karolak, Eric J. "No Idea of Doing Anything Wonderful: The Labor-Crisis Origins of National Housing Policy and the Reconstruction of the Working-Class Community, 1917-1919." In From Tenemants to the Taylor Homes; In Search of an Urban Housing Policy in Twentieth-Century American. John F. Bauman, Roger Biles, Kristin M. Szylvian, eds. pp. 60-80. University Park, PA: Pennsylvania State University, 2000. Hanchett, Thomas W. "The Other 'Subsidized Housing': Federal Aid to Suburbanization, 1940-1960s." In From Tenements to the Taylor Homes; In Search of an Urban Housing Policy in Twentieth-Century American. John F. Bauman, Roger Biles, Kristin M. Szylvian, eds. Pp. 163-179. University Park, PA: Pennsylvania State University, 2000. Howard, Ebenezer. Garden Cities of Tomorrow. London: Swan Sonnenschein & Co., Ltd., 1902. Major Bibliographic References: Historic Inventory Report Thursday, October 28, 2010 Page 6 of 6 2010 Southwest Elevation, Looking East Photos 2010 Northeast Elevation, Looking Southwest Historic Inventory Report Thursday, October 28, 2010 Page 1 of 6 Identification Hetzel, Christopher PO Box 2316 Survey Name:Date Recorded: Field Recorder: Owner's Name:Renton Housing Authority 10/06/2010 City:Renton Classification:Building Resource Status:Comments: State:WA Zip:98056-0316 Within a District?No Contributing?No National Register: Local District: National Register District/Thematic Nomination Name: Owner Address: Survey/Inventory Not Eligible Eligibility Status: Determination Date: Determination Comments: Not Determined - SHPO 1/1/0001 Sunset Terrace Redevelopment Subarea Sunset Terrace Public Housing Complex 2717 Sunset Ln NE, Renton, WA 98056 Location Field Site No.DAHP No. Historic Name: Common Name:2717 Sunset Ln NE Property Address: Comments: King County T23R05E 09 Township/Range/EW Section 1/4 Sec 1/4 1/4 Sec RENTON Quadrangle Tax No./Parcel No.7227801055 Plat/Block/Lot Acreage Supplemental Map(s) Coordinate Reference Projection: Datum: Easting: Northing: HARN (feet) Washington State Plane South 1224789 794430 Historic Inventory Report Thursday, October 28, 2010 Page 2 of 6 Description Narrative Historic Use:Domestic - Multiple Family House Current Use:Domestic - Multiple Family House Plan:Rectangle Stories:2 Structural System:Platform Frame Changes to Plan:Intact Changes to Interior:Unknown Changes to Original Cladding:Extensive Changes to Windows:Extensive Changes to Other:Not Applicable Other (specify): Style: Form/Type: Cladding: Foundation: Roof Type:Roof Material: Architecture/Landscape Architecture Study Unit Other Date of Construction: Architect:George W. Stoddard-Huggard & Associates Engineer: Property appears to meet criteria for the National Register of Historic Places:No Property is located in a potential historic district (National and/or local):No Property potentially contributes to a historic district (National and/or local):No Builder:Dahlgren Construction Company Veneer - Vinyl SidingModern Gable - Side Gable Asphalt / Composition - Shingle Concrete - Poured Multi-Family 1977 Remodel 1959 Built Date Historic Inventory Report Thursday, October 28, 2010 Page 3 of 6 The property has been evaluated according to the eligibility criteria for listing in the National Register of Historic Places (NRHP). Due to the many alterations, the integrity of the individual buildings and the complex as a whole is considered poor. The Sunset Terrace public housing complex resulted from federal investment in public housing during the postwar period and is associated with a well-known Seattle architect. However, it is a late example of its architectural type and its individual elements were substantially altered by rehabilitations in the 1970s and 1990s, such that they no longer appear to retain sufficient integrity to convey their historical significance. Based on our review, the property has poor integrity and does not appear eligible for listing in the NRHP individually or as a potential historic district. Stoddard’s design for Sunset Terrace appears to have been strongly influenced by the Garden City movement and exhibits features and characteristics of garden style apartments. All 27 buildings were arranged along curvilinear streets in locations to best take advantage of the original topography and create open, pleasing landscapes for residents. Throughout Sunset Terrace, each building is separated by open courtyard areas with outdoor space dedicated to individual housing units. At the rear of each unit, this space was originally identified by unit-specific metal revolving clotheslines. Additional design features included minimal ornamentation, aluminum windows, and varied exterior wall cladding of horizontal rustic cedar siding, vertical rough cedar channel siding, or resawn split cedar shake siding with some brick veneer. The Renton Housing Authority completed a comprehensive rehabilitation of Sunset Terrace in the 1970s, which resulted in the removal and replacement of many of these features. The original windows were replaced with new metal windows, unit doors were replaced, the revolving clotheslines were removed, and the original cedar wall claddings were replaced with vinyl siding. Subsequent changes occurred in the early 1990s when buildings in the complex were upgraded for ADA accessibility. Kitchens and bathrooms in the individual housing units were also substantially renovated at this time. The property was evaluated at a reconnaissance level in a cultural resources survey completed for the proposed Sunset Terrace Redevelopment Subarea in the City of Renton, King County, Washington. It is one of 27 buildings constructed by the Housing Authority of the City of Renton as part of the Sunset Terrace public housing complex authorized on June 28, 1958 and completed in 1959. Sunset Terrace consisted of a complex of 100 low-income housing units comprising both one- and two-story structures arranged along curvilinear streets. The complex was constructed by Seattle-based Dahlgren Construction Company according to designs by George W. Stoddard-Huggard & Associates. George W. Stoddard, a prominent Seattle architect and principal of the firm, is credited with the design of many well known public, private, and civic structures in the Seattle area, including such noted properties as the High School Memorial Stadium, the Green Lake Aqua Theater, and the Yesler Terrace Defense Housing Project. Stoddard retired in 1960, and the Sunset Terrace public housing complex is believed to have been one of his last commissions. Statement of Significance: Historic Inventory Report Thursday, October 28, 2010 Page 4 of 6 The property contains a two-story four unit apartment building constructed as part of the Sunset Terrace public housing complex in 1958-1959. Buildings in the complex were designed in one of six standard design types, each exhibiting Modern style elements. This building was constructed as a type “C” building. The building has a long rectangular plan and consists of platform frame wood construction on a poured concrete foundation. It has a very low pitch side gable roof clad with composition asphalt shingles and featuring slightly overhanging eaves with a wide fascia. Four small cylindrical, metal roof vents stand equally spaced along the roof ridge line. The exterior walls are clad with non-original horizontally applied vinyl siding. This siding replaced the building’s original, vertically applied, rough cedar channel siding during rehabilitation of the building in the 1970s. The building has a southwest-northeast orientation and its primary (southwest) facade forms a landscaped courtyard with another building to the southwest. The primary facade is symmetrically divided and consists of four nearly identical sections, each comprising a single housing unit. On the first story, each section consists of a single door opening fit with a non-original paneled door, flanked by a wide tripartite picture window. Two cantilevered shed roofs extend between the sections sheltering each pair of door openings. The doors open onto poured concrete stoops connected to poured concrete sidewalks that lead to the street. On the second story, the two outer sections are punctuated by a slightly shorter, tripartite picture window and by two tripartite picture windows in the center sections. The building’s rear elevation is similarly divided, each section containing a single door opening flanked by a wide tripartite picture window on the first story, and featuring a wide tripartite picture window and a small metal sliding window in the outer bays and two tripartite picture windows and a small sliding window in the center bays on the second story. The two center sections on the second story projects from the elevation, cantilevered over the first story. The building’s side elevations are unadorned. All of the building’s original windows were replaced with non-original metal windows in the 1970s. Other alterations to the building include the removal of original metal revolving clothes lines outside the rear entrance of each unit, and complete renovations of the building’s bathrooms and kitchens and ADA accessibility improvements in the early 1990s. Description of Physical Appearance: Historic Inventory Report Thursday, October 28, 2010 Page 5 of 6 Ochsner, Jeffery Karl, ed. Shaping Seattle Architecture: A Historical Guide to the Architects. Seattle, WA: University of Washington Press, 1998. Lord, Tom Forrester. Decent Housing: A Promise to Keep. Federal Housing Policy and its Impact on the City. Cambridge, MA: Schenkman Publishing Company, Inc., 1977. Madison, Charles A. Preface. In How the Other Half Lives. Jacob A. Riis. New York, NY: Dover Publications, Inc., 1971. __________. "Obituaries: George W. Stoddard." 29 September 1967:16. Seattle, WA. Rabinowitz, Alan. Urban Economics and Land Use in America: The Transformation of Cities in the Twentieth Century. Armonk, NY: M.E. Sharpe, Inc., 2004. The Seattle Times. "Seattle Firm Supported for Housing Job." 18 March 1959:44. Seattle, WA. Elenga, Maureen R. Seattle Architecture: A Walking Guide to Downtown. Seattle, WA: Seattle Architecture Foundation, 2007. Associated Press. "Tacoma Gets Housing Blues; To Renton It’s Not News." The Seattle Times. Seattle, WA, 29 June 1958. George W. Stoddard-Huggard & Associates. "Housing Authority of the City of Renton: Project Washington II-I, Renton Highlands, Renton, Washington." Construction Plans. Seattle, WA: George W. Stoddard- Huggard & Associates Architects & Engineers, 1958. On file with Renton Housing Authority, Renton, WA. Karolak, Eric J. "No Idea of Doing Anything Wonderful: The Labor-Crisis Origins of National Housing Policy and the Reconstruction of the Working-Class Community, 1917-1919." In From Tenemants to the Taylor Homes; In Search of an Urban Housing Policy in Twentieth-Century American. John F. Bauman, Roger Biles, Kristin M. Szylvian, eds. pp. 60-80. University Park, PA: Pennsylvania State University, 2000. Hanchett, Thomas W. "The Other 'Subsidized Housing': Federal Aid to Suburbanization, 1940-1960s." In From Tenements to the Taylor Homes; In Search of an Urban Housing Policy in Twentieth-Century American. John F. Bauman, Roger Biles, Kristin M. Szylvian, eds. Pp. 163-179. University Park, PA: Pennsylvania State University, 2000. Howard, Ebenezer. Garden Cities of Tomorrow. London: Swan Sonnenschein & Co., Ltd., 1902. Major Bibliographic References: Historic Inventory Report Thursday, October 28, 2010 Page 6 of 6 2010 Northeast Elevation, Looking South Photos 2010 Southwest Elevation, Looking East Historic Inventory Report Thursday, October 28, 2010 Page 1 of 6 Identification Hetzel, Christopher PO Box 2316 Survey Name:Date Recorded: Field Recorder: Owner's Name:Renton Housing Authority 10/06/2010 City:Renton Classification:Building Resource Status:Comments: State:WA Zip:98056-0316 Within a District?No Contributing?No National Register: Local District: National Register District/Thematic Nomination Name: Owner Address: Survey/Inventory Not Eligible Eligibility Status: Determination Date: Determination Comments: Not Determined - SHPO 1/1/0001 Sunset Terrace Redevelopment Subarea Sunset Terrace Public Housing Complex 2720 Sunset Ln NE, Renton, WA 98056 Location Field Site No.DAHP No. Historic Name: Common Name:2720 Sunset Ln NE Property Address: Comments: King County T23R05E 09 Township/Range/EW Section 1/4 Sec 1/4 1/4 Sec RENTON Quadrangle Tax No./Parcel No.7227801055 Plat/Block/Lot Acreage Supplemental Map(s) Coordinate Reference Projection: Datum: Easting: Northing: HARN (feet) Washington State Plane South 1224691 794541 Historic Inventory Report Thursday, October 28, 2010 Page 2 of 6 Description Narrative Historic Use:Domestic - Multiple Family House Current Use:Domestic - Multiple Family House Plan:Rectangle Stories:2 Structural System:Platform Frame Changes to Plan:Intact Changes to Interior:Unknown Changes to Original Cladding:Extensive Changes to Windows:Extensive Changes to Other:Not Applicable Other (specify): Style: Form/Type: Cladding: Foundation: Roof Type:Roof Material: Architecture/Landscape Architecture Study Unit Other Date of Construction: Architect:George W. Stoddard-Huggard & Associates Engineer: Property appears to meet criteria for the National Register of Historic Places:No Property is located in a potential historic district (National and/or local):No Property potentially contributes to a historic district (National and/or local):No Builder:Dahlgren Construction Company Veneer - Vinyl SidingModern Gable - Side Gable Asphalt / Composition - Shingle Concrete - Poured Multi-Family 1977 Remodel 1959 Built Date Historic Inventory Report Thursday, October 28, 2010 Page 3 of 6 The property has been evaluated according to the eligibility criteria for listing in the National Register of Historic Places (NRHP). Due to the many alterations, the integrity of the individual buildings and the complex as a whole is considered poor. The Sunset Terrace public housing complex resulted from federal investment in public housing during the postwar period and is associated with a well-known Seattle architect. However, it is a late example of its architectural type and its individual elements were substantially altered by rehabilitations in the 1970s and 1990s, such that they no longer appear to retain sufficient integrity to convey their historical significance. Based on our review, the property has poor integrity and does not appear eligible for listing in the NRHP individually or as a potential historic district. Stoddard’s design for Sunset Terrace appears to have been strongly influenced by the Garden City movement and exhibits features and characteristics of garden style apartments. All 27 buildings were arranged along curvilinear streets in locations to best take advantage of the original topography and create open, pleasing landscapes for residents. Throughout Sunset Terrace, each building is separated by open courtyard areas with outdoor space dedicated to individual housing units. At the rear of each unit, this space was originally identified by unit-specific metal revolving clotheslines. Additional design features included minimal ornamentation, aluminum windows, and varied exterior wall cladding of horizontal rustic cedar siding, vertical rough cedar channel siding, or resawn split cedar shake siding with some brick veneer. The Renton Housing Authority completed a comprehensive rehabilitation of Sunset Terrace in the 1970s, which resulted in the removal and replacement of many of these features. The original windows were replaced with new metal windows, unit doors were replaced, the revolving clotheslines were removed, and the original cedar wall claddings were replaced with vinyl siding. Subsequent changes occurred in the early 1990s when buildings in the complex were upgraded for ADA accessibility. Kitchens and bathrooms in the individual housing units were also substantially renovated at this time. The property was evaluated at a reconnaissance level in a cultural resources survey completed for the proposed Sunset Terrace Redevelopment Subarea in the City of Renton, King County, Washington. It is one of 27 buildings constructed by the Housing Authority of the City of Renton as part of the Sunset Terrace public housing complex authorized on June 28, 1958 and completed in 1959. Sunset Terrace consisted of a complex of 100 low-income housing units comprising both one- and two-story structures arranged along curvilinear streets. The complex was constructed by Seattle-based Dahlgren Construction Company according to designs by George W. Stoddard-Huggard & Associates. George W. Stoddard, a prominent Seattle architect and principal of the firm, is credited with the design of many well known public, private, and civic structures in the Seattle area, including such noted properties as the High School Memorial Stadium, the Green Lake Aqua Theater, and the Yesler Terrace Defense Housing Project. Stoddard retired in 1960, and the Sunset Terrace public housing complex is believed to have been one of his last commissions. Statement of Significance: Historic Inventory Report Thursday, October 28, 2010 Page 4 of 6 The property contains a one to two-story four unit apartment building constructed as part of the Sunset Terrace public housing complex in 1958-1959. Buildings in the complex were designed in one of six standard design types, each exhibiting Modern style elements. This building was constructed as a type “D” building. The building has a long rectangular plan and consists of platform frame wood construction on a poured concrete foundation. It has a very low pitch side gable roof clad with composition asphalt shingles and featuring slightly overhanging eaves with a wide fascia. Four small cylindrical, metal roof vents stand equally spaced along the roof ridge line. The exterior walls are clad with non-original horizontally applied vinyl siding. This siding replaced the building’s original resawn split cedar shake siding during rehabilitation of the building in the 1970s. The building has a southeast-northwest orientation and its primary (southeast) facade fronts Sunset Lane NE. The primary facade is symmetrically divided and consists of four sections, each comprising a single housing unit. The two center sections are two stories tall and the two outer sections are one story tall. On the first story, each section consists of a single door opening fit with a non-original paneled door, flanked by a wide tripartite picture window. The doors open onto poured concrete stoops connected to poured concrete sidewalks that lead to the street. On the second story, each center section is punctuated by a single, slightly shorter, tripartite picture window. The building’s rear elevation is similarly divided, each section containing a single door opening flanked by a small metal-sliding window and a tripartite picture window on the first story, and featuring a wide tripartite picture window and a small metal-sliding window on the second story. The building’s side elevations are unadorned. All of the building’s original windows were replaced with non-original metal windows in the 1970s. Other alterations to the building include the removal of original metal revolving clothes lines outside the rear entrance of each unit, and complete renovations of the building’s bathrooms and kitchens and ADA accessibility improvements in the early 1990s. Description of Physical Appearance: Historic Inventory Report Thursday, October 28, 2010 Page 5 of 6 Ochsner, Jeffery Karl, ed. Shaping Seattle Architecture: A Historical Guide to the Architects. Seattle, WA: University of Washington Press, 1998. Lord, Tom Forrester. Decent Housing: A Promise to Keep. Federal Housing Policy and its Impact on the City. Cambridge, MA: Schenkman Publishing Company, Inc., 1977. Madison, Charles A. Preface. In How the Other Half Lives. Jacob A. Riis. New York, NY: Dover Publications, Inc., 1971. __________. "Obituaries: George W. Stoddard." 29 September 1967:16. Seattle, WA. Rabinowitz, Alan. Urban Economics and Land Use in America: The Transformation of Cities in the Twentieth Century. Armonk, NY: M.E. Sharpe, Inc., 2004. The Seattle Times. "Seattle Firm Supported for Housing Job." 18 March 1959:44. Seattle, WA. Elenga, Maureen R. Seattle Architecture: A Walking Guide to Downtown. Seattle, WA: Seattle Architecture Foundation, 2007. Associated Press. "Tacoma Gets Housing Blues; To Renton It’s Not News." The Seattle Times. Seattle, WA, 29 June 1958. George W. Stoddard-Huggard & Associates. "Housing Authority of the City of Renton: Project Washington II-I, Renton Highlands, Renton, Washington." Construction Plans. Seattle, WA: George W. Stoddard- Huggard & Associates Architects & Engineers, 1958. On file with Renton Housing Authority, Renton, WA. Karolak, Eric J. "No Idea of Doing Anything Wonderful: The Labor-Crisis Origins of National Housing Policy and the Reconstruction of the Working-Class Community, 1917-1919." In From Tenemants to the Taylor Homes; In Search of an Urban Housing Policy in Twentieth-Century American. John F. Bauman, Roger Biles, Kristin M. Szylvian, eds. pp. 60-80. University Park, PA: Pennsylvania State University, 2000. Hanchett, Thomas W. "The Other 'Subsidized Housing': Federal Aid to Suburbanization, 1940-1960s." In From Tenements to the Taylor Homes; In Search of an Urban Housing Policy in Twentieth-Century American. John F. Bauman, Roger Biles, Kristin M. Szylvian, eds. Pp. 163-179. University Park, PA: Pennsylvania State University, 2000. Howard, Ebenezer. Garden Cities of Tomorrow. London: Swan Sonnenschein & Co., Ltd., 1902. Major Bibliographic References: Historic Inventory Report Thursday, October 28, 2010 Page 6 of 6 2010 West and South Elevations, Looking Northeast Photos South Elevation, Looking North 2010 South Elevation, Looking Northwest 2010 Historic Inventory Report Thursday, October 28, 2010 Page 1 of 6 Identification Hetzel, Christopher PO Box 2316 Survey Name:Date Recorded: Field Recorder: Owner's Name:Renton Housing Authority 10/06/2010 City:Renton Classification:Building Resource Status:Comments: State:WA Zip:98056-0316 Within a District?No Contributing?No National Register: Local District: National Register District/Thematic Nomination Name: Owner Address: Survey/Inventory Not Eligible Eligibility Status: Determination Date: Determination Comments: Not Determined - SHPO 1/1/0001 Sunset Terrace Redevelopment Subarea Sunset Terrace Public Housing Complex 2723 Sunset Ln NE, Renton, WA 98056 Location Field Site No.DAHP No. Historic Name: Common Name:2723 Sunset Ln NE Property Address: Comments: King County T23R05E 09 Township/Range/EW Section 1/4 Sec 1/4 1/4 Sec RENTON Quadrangle Tax No./Parcel No.7227801085 Plat/Block/Lot Acreage Supplemental Map(s) Coordinate Reference Projection: Datum: Easting: Northing: HARN (feet) Washington State Plane South 1224825 794519 Historic Inventory Report Thursday, October 28, 2010 Page 2 of 6 Description Narrative Historic Use:Domestic - Multiple Family House Current Use:Domestic - Multiple Family House Plan:Rectangle Stories:2 Structural System:Platform Frame Changes to Plan:Intact Changes to Interior:Unknown Changes to Original Cladding:Extensive Changes to Windows:Extensive Changes to Other:Not Applicable Other (specify): Style: Form/Type: Cladding: Foundation: Roof Type:Roof Material: Architecture/Landscape Architecture Study Unit Other Date of Construction: Architect:George W. Stoddard-Huggard & Associates Engineer: Property appears to meet criteria for the National Register of Historic Places:No Property is located in a potential historic district (National and/or local):No Property potentially contributes to a historic district (National and/or local):No Builder:Dahlgren Construction Company Veneer - Vinyl SidingModern Gable - Side Gable Asphalt / Composition - Shingle Concrete - Poured Multi-Family 1977 Remodel 1959 Built Date Historic Inventory Report Thursday, October 28, 2010 Page 3 of 6 The property has been evaluated according to the eligibility criteria for listing in the National Register of Historic Places (NRHP). Due to the many alterations, the integrity of the individual buildings and the complex as a whole is considered poor. The Sunset Terrace public housing complex resulted from federal investment in public housing during the postwar period and is associated with a well-known Seattle architect. However, it is a late example of its architectural type and its individual elements were substantially altered by rehabilitations in the 1970s and 1990s, such that they no longer appear to retain sufficient integrity to convey their historical significance. Based on our review, the property has poor integrity and does not appear eligible for listing in the NRHP individually or as a potential historic district. Stoddard’s design for Sunset Terrace appears to have been strongly influenced by the Garden City movement and exhibits features and characteristics of garden style apartments. All 27 buildings were arranged along curvilinear streets in locations to best take advantage of the original topography and create open, pleasing landscapes for residents. Throughout Sunset Terrace, each building is separated by open courtyard areas with outdoor space dedicated to individual housing units. At the rear of each unit, this space was originally identified by unit-specific metal revolving clotheslines. Additional design features included minimal ornamentation, aluminum windows, and varied exterior wall cladding of horizontal rustic cedar siding, vertical rough cedar channel siding, or resawn split cedar shake siding with some brick veneer. The Renton Housing Authority completed a comprehensive rehabilitation of Sunset Terrace in the 1970s, which resulted in the removal and replacement of many of these features. The original windows were replaced with new metal windows, unit doors were replaced, the revolving clotheslines were removed, and the original cedar wall claddings were replaced with vinyl siding. Subsequent changes occurred in the early 1990s when buildings in the complex were upgraded for ADA accessibility. Kitchens and bathrooms in the individual housing units were also substantially renovated at this time. The property was evaluated at a reconnaissance level in a cultural resources survey completed for the proposed Sunset Terrace Redevelopment Subarea in the City of Renton, King County, Washington. It is one of 27 buildings constructed by the Housing Authority of the City of Renton as part of the Sunset Terrace public housing complex authorized on June 28, 1958 and completed in 1959. Sunset Terrace consisted of a complex of 100 low-income housing units comprising both one- and two-story structures arranged along curvilinear streets. The complex was constructed by Seattle-based Dahlgren Construction Company according to designs by George W. Stoddard-Huggard & Associates. George W. Stoddard, a prominent Seattle architect and principal of the firm, is credited with the design of many well known public, private, and civic structures in the Seattle area, including such noted properties as the High School Memorial Stadium, the Green Lake Aqua Theater, and the Yesler Terrace Defense Housing Project. Stoddard retired in 1960, and the Sunset Terrace public housing complex is believed to have been one of his last commissions. Statement of Significance: Historic Inventory Report Thursday, October 28, 2010 Page 4 of 6 The property contains a two-story four unit apartment building constructed as part of the Sunset Terrace public housing complex in 1958-1959. Buildings in the complex were designed in one of six standard design types, each exhibiting Modern style elements. This building was constructed as a type “E” building. The building has a long rectangular plan and consists of platform frame wood construction on a poured concrete foundation. It has a very low pitch side gable roof clad with composition asphalt shingles and featuring slightly overhanging eaves with a wide fascia. Four small cylindrical, metal roof vents stand equally spaced along the roof ridge line. The exterior walls are clad with non-original horizontally applied vinyl siding. This siding replaced the building’s original horizontally applied rustic cedar beveled siding during rehabilitation of the building in the 1970s. The building has a northwest-southeast orientation and its primary (northwest) facade fronts Sunset Lane NE. The primary facade is symmetrically divided and consists of four nearly identical sections, each comprising a single housing unit. On the first story, each section consists of a single door opening fit with a non-original paneled door, flanked by a wide tripartite picture window. Two cantilevered shed roofs extend between the sections sheltering each pair of door openings. The doors open onto poured concrete stoops connected to poured concrete sidewalks that lead to the street. On the second story, each section is punctuated by a slightly shorter, tripartite picture window. The building’s rear elevation is similarly divided, each section containing a single door opening flanked by two small windows on the first story, and featuring a wide tripartite picture window and another small window on the second story. The two center sections on the second story projects from the elevation, cantilevered over the first story. The building’s side elevations are unadorned. All of the building’s original windows were replaced with non-original metal windows in the 1970s. Other alterations to the building include the removal of original metal revolving clothes lines outside the rear entrance of each unit, and complete renovations of the building’s bathrooms and kitchens and ADA accessibility improvements in the early 1990s. Description of Physical Appearance: Historic Inventory Report Thursday, October 28, 2010 Page 5 of 6 Ochsner, Jeffery Karl, ed. Shaping Seattle Architecture: A Historical Guide to the Architects. Seattle, WA: University of Washington Press, 1998. Lord, Tom Forrester. Decent Housing: A Promise to Keep. Federal Housing Policy and its Impact on the City. Cambridge, MA: Schenkman Publishing Company, Inc., 1977. Madison, Charles A. Preface. In How the Other Half Lives. Jacob A. Riis. New York, NY: Dover Publications, Inc., 1971. __________. "Obituaries: George W. Stoddard." 29 September 1967:16. Seattle, WA. Rabinowitz, Alan. Urban Economics and Land Use in America: The Transformation of Cities in the Twentieth Century. Armonk, NY: M.E. Sharpe, Inc., 2004. The Seattle Times. "Seattle Firm Supported for Housing Job." 18 March 1959:44. Seattle, WA. Elenga, Maureen R. Seattle Architecture: A Walking Guide to Downtown. Seattle, WA: Seattle Architecture Foundation, 2007. Associated Press. "Tacoma Gets Housing Blues; To Renton It’s Not News." The Seattle Times. Seattle, WA, 29 June 1958. George W. Stoddard-Huggard & Associates. "Housing Authority of the City of Renton: Project Washington II-I, Renton Highlands, Renton, Washington." Construction Plans. Seattle, WA: George W. Stoddard- Huggard & Associates Architects & Engineers, 1958. On file with Renton Housing Authority, Renton, WA. Karolak, Eric J. "No Idea of Doing Anything Wonderful: The Labor-Crisis Origins of National Housing Policy and the Reconstruction of the Working-Class Community, 1917-1919." In From Tenemants to the Taylor Homes; In Search of an Urban Housing Policy in Twentieth-Century American. John F. Bauman, Roger Biles, Kristin M. Szylvian, eds. pp. 60-80. University Park, PA: Pennsylvania State University, 2000. Hanchett, Thomas W. "The Other 'Subsidized Housing': Federal Aid to Suburbanization, 1940-1960s." In From Tenements to the Taylor Homes; In Search of an Urban Housing Policy in Twentieth-Century American. John F. Bauman, Roger Biles, Kristin M. Szylvian, eds. Pp. 163-179. University Park, PA: Pennsylvania State University, 2000. Howard, Ebenezer. Garden Cities of Tomorrow. London: Swan Sonnenschein & Co., Ltd., 1902. Major Bibliographic References: Historic Inventory Report Thursday, October 28, 2010 Page 6 of 6 2010 Southwest and Southeast Elevations, Looking North Photos 2010 Northeast and Northwest Elevations, Looking South     Appendix C  Unanticipated Discovery Plan        Cultural Resources Survey Report—Potential Sunset Terrace  Redevelopment Subarea and NE Sunset Boulevard C‐1 October 2010 ICF 00593.10   Plan and Procedures for Dealing with the Unanticipated Discovery of Human  Skeletal Remains or Cultural Resources during Redevelopment of the Edmonds‐ Glenwood Lot, Harrington Lot, and Sunset Terrace Public Housing Complex in  Renton, Washington      Any human skeletal remains that are discovered during this project will be treated with dignity and  respect.  A. If any City of Renton employee or any of the contractors or subcontractors believes that he or  she has made an unanticipated discovery of human skeletal remains or cultural resources, all  work adjacent to the discovery shall cease. The area of work stoppage will be adequate to  provide for the security, protection, and integrity of the human skeletal remains, in accordance  with Washington State Law. The City of Renton project manager will be contacted.  B. The City of Renton project manager or the City of Renton representative will be responsible for  taking appropriate steps to protect the discovery. At a minimum, the immediate area will be  secured to a distance of thirty (30) feet from the discovery. Vehicles, equipment, and  unauthorized personnel will not be permitted to traverse the discovery site.  C. If skeletal remains are discovered, the City of Renton will immediately call the King County  Sheriff’s office and a cultural resource specialist or consultant qualified to identify human  skeletal remains. The Sheriff’s office may arrange for a representative of the county coroner’s  office to examine the discovery. The remains should be protected in place until the cultural  resource specialist has examined the find.   D. If the human skeletal remains are determined to be Native American, the City of Renton will  notify the Washington State Department of Archaeology and Historic Preservation and the  Muckleshoot Indian Tribes.  E. If cultural resources are uncovered, such as stone tools or flakes, fire‐cracked rocks from a  hearth feature, butchered animal bones, or historic‐era objects (e.g., patent medicine bottles,  milk tins, clay pipes, building foundations), the City of Renton will arrange for a qualified  professional archaeologist to evaluate the find. Again, the cultural resources will be protected in  place until the archaeologist has examined the find.   F. If the cultural resources find is determined to be significant, the City of Renton cultural resource  specialist/archaeologist or consulting archaeologist will immediately contact the Washington  State Department of Archaeology and Historic Preservation and the Muckleshoot Indian Tribes  to seek consultation regarding the eligibility of any further discovery for inclusion in the  National Register of Historic Places.   City of Renton  Appendix C   Cultural Resources Survey Report—Potential Sunset Terrace  Redevelopment Subarea and NE Sunset Boulevard C‐2 October 2010 ICF 00593.10   CONTACT INFORMATION    Erika Conkling, AICP, Senior Planner  City of Renton Department of Community and Economic Development  Renton City Hall  1055 South Grady Way  Renton, WA 98057     Phone: (425) 430‐6578    Stephanie Kramer  Assistant State Archaeologist  Department of Archaeology and Historic Preservation  PO Box 48343  1063 Capitol Way South  Olympia, WA 98504‐8343  Phone: (360) 586‐3083    King County Sheriff’s Office Headquarters  516 Third Avenue, Room W‐150  Seattle, WA 98104‐2312   Phone: (206) 296‐4155 (non‐emergency)    Laura Murphy  Muckleshoot Tribe Cultural Resources  39015 172nd Avenue SE  Auburn, WA 98092  Phone: (253) 876‐3272